Wikipedia talk:WikiProject California/Santa Barbara County task force

message: Some articles covered by this WikiProject lack photographs. As part of a subcategorization of the requested photos category, there is now a category for California articles needing photos - to use it, just add  to the article's talk page. I have only added a few articles to the category so far, but it would be an easy way to make an extensive list California-related articles lacking photos. I hope you find it useful! TheGrappler 05:19, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in California]]

message: There's a discussion here about how best to (further) split up the .  Ideally, we'd do this by generally-recognised regions consisting of a readily-identifiable list of whole counties, such that there's at least 60 existing stubs in each (but not so many as to mean we're likely to be doing the same thing again before too long).  Comments welcome.  Alai 00:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  CA-geo-stub sub-types proposed 

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.   B2T2 18:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.  Badbilltucker 22:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: There is curently a proposal for a WikiProject California Award. I proposed expanding it to include this WP. Check out the link and feel free to comment. --evrik (talk) 21:52, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is currently a final vote being held on a WikiProject Award for all California related projects. You may wish to give your input here. Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 19:31, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Award

message: I'm back to editing some of the SB related articles. I'm going to start working on the one about the school district (SBSD)first. A lot of things have been happening with teacher salaries and it's a pretty big district. --hello, i'm a member | talk to me! 02:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hello

message: One of this Project's Good Articles, Presidio of Santa Barbara has been nominated for Good Article review.  Everyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Drewcifer3000 19:42, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review 

message: Greetings:  I am reposting a request that I originally posted at :Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Environment last week, in hopes of attracting another collaborator:
I've just made a rather shocking and very dismaying discovery: There's no article about the 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill. In fact, on all of Wikipedia, there are no more than a handful of passing references to this event. It's not even mentioned in the :List of oil spills. Yikes! How on earth is this possible??? This is mind-boggling. In all seriousness, this is undoubtedly the most glaring omission I have ever found on Wikipedia (and, believe me, I've found more than a few). We are talking about the single event that was most directly responsible for launching the modern environmental movement on a mass scale. It's no mere coincidence that Earth Day 1970 took place just months later. 
Especially with two oil spill eco-disasters currently under way, I hope I'm not alone in feeling that creation of this article should be a very high priority for this Project. I am in the middle of some very time-consuming things elsewhere on Wikipedia right now, but I promise that I will join in on a collaboration to write this article. Please reply here, and leave a note on my talk page, if you are interested -- especially if you've got good sourcing material. Regards, -- Cgingold (talk) 22:05, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw your comments and I appreciate your suggestion to make an article on this oil spill accident. Most likely, I will start an article on this on coming Wednesday. OhanaUnitedTalk page 13:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santa Barbara oil spill 

message: Please see :Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Santa Barbara County, California. GregManninLB (talk) 23:22, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New photo request category

message: I am looking into starting Wikimedia California. Anyone interested? Geoff Plourde (talk) 03:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikimedia California? 

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection before December 2008, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 16:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Santa Barbara County 

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:29, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: Based on the general project activity level, number of participants, and the overlap in scope with WP:WikiProject California, I feel this project should be changed to a task force of WikiProject California. Right now this would involve replacing all instances of  withz . :Category:Unassessed Santa Barbara County articles only has 16 articles at the moment, so there isn't really a huge amount of issues caused by unassessed santa barbara articles overlapping with california, but I don't really see a need for a lot of the overlapping bureaucratic overhead caused having two similar projects. Any thoughts, objections, etc? -Optigan13 (talk) 04:04, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Swapping the article templates should still retain :Category:Santa Barbara County articles by quality. Santa Barbara County would share whatever assessment is in the WP CAL banner, but would still have an independent importance rating. Right now as part of the update to WP CAL there is also a bot-assisted assessment of all unassessed california articles. I'm not really interested in wiping out the participant lists or trying to force anything on this project aside from losing the separate talkpage template. -Optigan13 (talk) 05:02, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Sounds like a good idea to me. John Carter (talk) 15:28, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing this project to a task force of WikiProject California 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:52, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Santa Barbara County articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:34, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santa Barbara County articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Pride! 
* What? Wiki Loves Pride, a campaign to document and photograph LGBT culture and history, including pride events
* When? June 2015
* How can you help? 
*: 1.) Create or improve LGBT-related articles and showcase the results of your work here
*: 2.) Upload photographs or other media related to LGBT culture and history, including pride events, and add images to relevant Wikipedia articles; feel free to create a subpage with a gallery of your images (see examples from last year)
*: 3.) Contribute to an LGBT-related task force at another Wikimedia project (Wikidata, Wikimedia Commons, Wikivoyage, etc.)
Or, view or update the current list of Tasks. This campaign is supported by the Wikimedia LGBT+ User Group, an officially recognized affiliate of the Wikimedia Foundation. Visit the group's page at Meta-Wiki for more information, or follow Wikimedia LGBT+ on Facebook. Remember, Wiki Loves Pride is about creating and improving LGBT-related content at Wikimedia projects, and content should have a neutral point of view. One does not need to identify as LGBT or any other gender or sexual minority to participate. This campaign is about adding accurate, reliable information to Wikipedia, plain and simple, and all are welcome! 
If you have any questions, please leave a message on the campaign's main talk page.
Thanks, and happy editing!
User:Another Believer and User:OR drohowa
(timestamp may not be accurate) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Another Believer (talk • contribs) 15:13, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Pride 2015|Wiki Loves Pride]]! 

message: Come on, we need to get going again, there are some articles I'm interested in upgrading to B and GA ratings. Evancahill (talk) 22:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Raise Santa Barbara County Task Force Activity

message: I'm having a role call for all active members. Evancahill (talk) 00:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Here! Evancahill (talk) 00:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

text: Here! Note: I'm going to be inactive for a while. Lightningmist (talk) 00:17, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: This role call is now over. If you would like to report to the task force, add your own section saying this: Hi, I'm (user name). I'd like to (join or become active with) the Santa Barbara County task force. (Sign using the four "~"s.). Evancahill (talk) 23:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Evancahill (talk) 23:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Role Call #1: 1/12/16

message: https://wikiconference.org/wiki/Submissions--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 00:40, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please See - Submissions 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool