Talk:Yoda/Archive 1

message: For the final time, Yoda is not a whill. Someone please change it.
YODA IS A WHILL STOP CHANGING IT TO "UNKNOWN" George lucas said so himself. George Lucas: "The Whill home world of Grentarik will be featured in the upcoming films. Yoda's species type is the Whill. It is safe to assume that several of Yoda's relatives will be seen." http://www.supershadow.com/starwars/lucas/ Friday, September 28, 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.85.165.195 (talk) 09:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Whill

message: I remember reading something about when yoda turned dark for a short while and someone said if he had confronted palpatine he would have annihalated him. Can anyone confirm im not imagining this, id like to get hold of the book, thanks.
Ah...I forget the title. But it was actually kinda funny. 68.192.117.112 13:10, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark Yoda 

message: (sorry , don't know where to add this , but here)
I really don't think Palpatine and Yoda are evenly matched. Yoda is definitely stronger because Palpatine was standing inside the Senate Pod while Yoda was standing near the edge of the Senate Pod with nothing to stop him from falling. Both sides of the Force repelled each master, but Palpatine was repelled with a somersault from the inside of the Senate Pod (the chair inside the Senate Pod should counteract some of the repelled Force) and Yoda was just repelled with a smaller distance. One can verify this by watching the DVD frame by frame. Yoda had to leave because of his location but not his skill with the Force.
I am hoping that author  can incorporate this fact into the article.
:Sorry, but that should not be incorporated into the article. It oozes POV. You, I, and everyone else, including Sith fanboys, know that Yoda is arguably more powerful than Sidious. The Sith Master is seen obviously trying to outduel the great Jedi, and takes an extremely risky gamble. But the fact of the matter is Yoda lost, albeit it to luck. Go to the Palpatine talk page, I believe there is a debate on the subject there.
The fact of the matter is Yoda was on the defensive most of the time, although neither opponent could gain a definitive edge over the other in terms of saber combat. Once Sidious realized this and took the high ground, he began to dominate over Yoda though, keeping the Jedi Master on the ropes. I shall quote the official entry for Yoda from the Star Wars databank: "Inside the spacious interior of the Galactic Senate chambers, Yoda challenged the Emperor. The two entered into a spectacular duel -- a contest between the most powerful practitioners of the Force's light and dark sides. The Emperor proved too powerful to defeat. Though Yoda held his own for much of the duel, in the end, the Sith bested him. He realized that directly confronting the Sith would be doomed to failure. Defeated, Yoda slinked away into the shadows of the Senate chamber's cavernous depths, leaping into a waiting getaway speeder piloted by Bail Organa." I know some people debate the validity of the databank entries, and that's ok. Nevertheless, unlike the Mace vs. Palpatine duel the situation is far less ambiguous. Take from this what you may, but for now lets try to keep the article as NPOV as possible. --Exor 19:19, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoda vs Palpatine   

message: IMHO Yoda speaks English (Galactic Basic) using the, perhaps more-traditionally (in the Star Wars Universe, anyway) German syntax and conventions. That arranged can be.
:IMO this isn't true - eg. "Agree with you the council does. Your apprentice Skywalker will be." - if you keep the word order it sounds as awkward in German. The problem here is rather the focus, normally we put the 'most important' thing at the beginning (for example to us 'the council' is more important, but Yoda shifts focus to the agreement). (as a side note a professor here used Yoda quotes to illustrate non-standard grammar in an English grammar lecture at university here, hehe)  (--clem 11:03, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yodatsch 

message: The "sardinian" thing is patently ridicolous, not encyclopedical at all and somewhat offensive.
I think articles dealing with Star Wars characters such as this one should focus primarily on the roles they have in the six movies, the symbolism around them and the inspiration for them, and the cultural significance they have, and only secondarily on the nuances of the Star Wars "continuity" and "expanded universe". There should be something in this article about how Yoda is a science fiction interpretation of a archetype of eccentric Taoist and Zen Buddhist holy men. Stuff like that instead of boring useless facts invented by mediocre novels.   --Anon. 17:44 05/19/05
:If you can do that while remaining rigorous and NPOV, you are entirely welcome to it; this is Wikipedia after all!  But I caution you, no Original Research. --maru 00:47, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article improvement 

message: I think it would be interesting to see Yoda's height among the rest of his stats... --Anonymous
:Is there now. --maru 00:47, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 

message: Someone made the full name Yoda D'Kana. As Hadal correctly pointed out, most of the sources that list this name also call him "the Whill", which this article claims as incorrect. Perhaps someone in the know could explain where the D'Kana bit comes from, and why it's incorrect (or correct). --W(t) 06:45, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
:Supershadow. Need I say more?  --Lord Patrick 10:06, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  D'kana 

message: In the Episode III novelization when Yoda says "A very great Jedi Master you have become, Qui-Gon Jinn. A very great Jedi Master you always were, but too blind I was to see it.", does this mean that Qui-Gon Jinn is considered an equal to Yoda or that he is slightly superior in his knowledge of the Force and as a Jedi? --82.92.119.11 5 November 2005 12:34 (UTC)
:The above comment was made by User:60.234.211.140, not me. . This user seems to have a history of signing with different account names. 82.92.119.11 21:43, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It does not necessarily imply either interpretation- Qui-Gon could well be a great Jedi Master, but not greater than Yoda. --Maru  (talk) Contribs 04:16, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Conversation between Yoda and Qui-Gon Jinn 

message: I don't know,this may sound weird, but I think yoda is a human from earth and of Serbian-American descent. --Anon.
:Wow. --Nufy8 01:31, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. --Maru  (talk) Contribs 03:04, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Right you are. Nufy8 02:48, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoda's species 

message: The aritcle has a section which stated Yoda mastered all seven form of lightsaber combat.
This is unbelieveable! I don't think there is any source proving that! It was always said Yoda mastered Form IV, never mention any other. Should we remove it? Darth Kevinmhk 04:17, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead. Nufy8 04:23, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey Nufy8, fans from Wookieepedia just informed that indeed Power of the Jedi RPG Source book confirm Yoda mastering all forms. Maybe we should put it back in.  Darth Kevinmhk 16:26, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Nufy8 18:38, 22 January 2006 (UTC)

text: You may be thinking of Vaapad, the second, perhaps more mature, variation of Form VII.  Juyo (the earlier version) has been mastered by many Jedi and Sith before, including Palpatine and apparently Yoda.  -- Solberg 03:20, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoda mastered all saber form? 

message: There should be a warning at the top of the talk page warning against the weird things in this page. ^^
Bibliomaniac15 02:21, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning 

message: Ummm, I think i read somewhere that Yoda was "...the grand master of the Jedi Order...a first among equals..." I really remember seeing that somewhere but I'm not sure if that's real, or simply some crazed fan trying to elevate Yoda higher than he already is.
:I vote for the latter. --maru  (talk) contribs 03:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As do I. The Wookieepedian 04:11, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, it is c-canon, see below, thanks. Darth Kevinmhk 10:24, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status 

message: The screenshot of a CG Yoda sitting in his Council chair claims to be from The Phantom Menace, but I'm not so sure. This article itself states that only two CG shots were taken of Yoda, and that they were distant shots. Although I don't have a copy of TPM with me to verify this, I personally do not remember seeing a close-up like that of a CG Yoda until Attack of the Clones. I bring this to the talk page because it seems to have been disputed through various reversions (and one I just did because it messed up the image tag), and the image's page states in several places that it is from TPM, which I'm doubting. Comments? Nufy8 01:29, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, at the ROTS DVD press conference, Rob Coleman was specifically asked if the puppet Yoda had been replaced in TPM, and he confirmed it, saying they had already completed that as a test for ROTS. I added that image here as a screencap from the clip of it on the ROTS bonus disc. The Wookieepedian 03:05, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see. I must have skipped the last paragraph of the "Animating Yoda" section. Thanks. Nufy8 04:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the image from TPM. The changed Yoda back to CG in Attack of the Clones. The image in the article that claims to be TPM is the look from Attack of the Clones. I have the most recent DVDs released for all six films (that includes the original three films that come in both Special Edition and Theatrical Cut), and Yoda did not look like what this article claims, in the Phantom Menace, he looked like the image I just provided in the link. In Attack of the Clones they changed him to CG, and made him look more like his ESB and ROTJ appearance. What you are claiming as fair use is a supposed image for a future DVD, that has not been released. There is no citation with this information, just the assumption that it will come out in 2007, at some point. The words of the article are " This edition will most likely be part of a 2007 DVD release of the Star Wars saga." That's some major crystal balling there. No citation, and can it be proven that the featurette wasn't using some later footage from the next two installments? Does is explicitely stat that it plans to release a new rendition of Yoda for Episode I, so that it looks like the next two episodes? From the wording, it appears that there is a lot of assumptions going on.   BIGNOLE    (Question?)  (What I do)  19:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CG Yoda screenshot 

message: *Well, i believe we should add the fact that Yoda being the Grand Master of the Jedi Order (Jedi Grand Master)/ Supreme Jedi Master. Sources: Yoda: Dark Rendezvous, ROTS Novel, The Swarm War. Reference: http://starwars.wikicities.com/wiki/Grand_Master Darth Kevinmhk 10:23, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Master of the Jedi Order 

message: I'm a (much later) graduate of USC, but I bought a copy of the Alumni Directory (a phonebook-size tome).  For fun I looked up some of the more famous alums, including Lucas.  When I looked at his graduting class from the film school, there was someone who actually had Yoda as a name.  I'm almost certain of this. but it was a while back and I need to check.  I will have to go find the book which is somewhere in my folks place to 100% confirm (unless someone here knows someone with the directory...).  "Inspiration, it may be".  Bobak 21:39, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible inspiration for the name "Yoda" 

message: If I have done this wrong...please excuse me and edit it out...In Sean Stuart's book "Yoda: Dark Rendezvous"...After haggling on a starship price, Yoda states " Not Interested in fair  am I...Interested in results."  Doesn't this sound like it should be totally the opposite for a Jedi?..It sounds like a Sith Mantra! --Evan
::I find it amazing how quick to point out that someone can be considered a Dark Sider because of one isolated incident involving something that could in some way be considered a dark side action. As far as I'm concerned, there's no debate whether Yoda has any dark side tendencies, all the good he did would outweigh it all anyway. --Deskana (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps my comment was too general then. I can see it happening to be honest. Everyone has emotions, even Jedi. Besides, you've taken the comment too out of context for me to give my honest opinion. Besides, according to Star Wars canon, whether we agree with it or not, Yoda did actually say that. --Deskana (talk) 14:44, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

text: S-canon? I was pretty sure Shatterpoint was C-canon. --maru   (talk)  contribs 20:19, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I left the comment about Yoda in Dark Rendezvous in there, but there's a problem: it says that he battled Dooku 8 years after the Battle of Geonosis, but Dooku died 3 years after that very battle. Anyone have the correct date? Nufy8 17:31, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark Side 

message: I'm helping a group of Star Wars fans to get a new internationally recognised 'Talk Like Yoda Day' organised.  The world already has 'Talk Like A Pirate Day' (wikipedia has an excellent article about it) and if 'Talk Like Yoda Day' is advertised enough, it could take off very well, just another fun parodic holiday.  The date decided for Talk Like Yoda Day is May 22nd, which is the day after the anniversary of when the world first saw Yoda on its screens (the release date of Empire Strikes Back).  There are links on the TLYD homepage to the Yoda-speak generator I've been working on (http://www.yodaspeak.co.uk/) to help prospective Yoda-talkers. :)
To help spread the word, we'd like it if the Yoda article contained a mention of Talk Like Yoda Day and its date, as well as a link to the Talk Like Yoda day homepage.  Perhaps in the External Links list.  So for now I'm testing the water to see what people think of the Yoda article containing this data.
By the way our website is http://www.talklikeyodaday.tk --Recurring 13:18, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Come back when it is as notable as TLAP day. A plan isn't notable. --maru   (talk)  contribs 01:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of information about Talk Like Yoda Day 

message: An IP editor is randomly adding Dagobyte into the article. It started with him trying to convince me that we should change Yoda's race to Dagobyte, but since I was unconvinced, he has been replacing random words with Dagobyte and won't stop. I suggest that any user which adds the word Dagobyte into the article inappropriately be given a  on their talk page, since it seems obvious to me that its all the same person. That sound good? Dagobyte. --Darth Revert (AKA Deskana) (talk) 19:43, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dagobyte Dagobyte Dagobyte Dagobyte Dagobyte Dagobyte Dagobyte Dagobyte Dagobyte Dagobyte Dagobyte Dagobyte 

message: Is there any proof of this? Like a interview with the creators of KH or something? I'm gonna remove it. Manhatten Project 2000 01:26, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kingdom Heart's fighting style a homage to Yoda? 

message: What is the "Yoda was the only person to die benevolent" section supposed to mean? Wouldn't other Jedi qualify too? Bibliomaniac15 22:09, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  benevolent 

message: I think it's has good information and has a lot of good pictures. The information is accurate. Videogamefan1992 15:21, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Yoda]]

message: The deletion of the etymology section is highly unacceptable and the reasoning given was entirely inaccurate.  If one were to read the information presented in my contributions to the article, it should be clear that for those interested in the etymological origins of the word Yoda, this section offers useful information/insight.  The argument of saying that the section is unecessary being that the information is already given in the introduction is based on false pretences, i.e., the summary had not even mentioned the entire concept of "Jota"/"Joda"/"Juda".  Moreover, even if that were not the case, the very idea of this argument is erroneous, as the very purpose of any section is to elaborate on the concise summary given in the introduction.  There is a significant difference between mentioning something and explaining it.  Conclusively, I hope that upon reconsidering all of the preceding, it is clear to you that the previous reversion of my contribution was in error.  sloth_monkey 04:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then if the "Jota" nomenclature is to have any creedence, then someone needs to include sources much better than those provided. Note that the info regarding "Jota" is from a second-hand source: an interview with a historian in a film. Moreover, there is no reference to an actual Masonic text. Therefore, this is an unverified claim. I'm also deleting footnote number 5 because it's not citing a specific source. Frankly, it's a dubious claim put forward by a crack-pot "occult researcher" and doesn't belong in a wikipedia article about a Star Wars character. Alcarillo 18:36, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  In further support of my assertions that this has no place here, please see this discussion on deleting an article about Jota. In light of this, I recommend the Etymology section be deleted. Alcarillo 18:45, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

text:  I removed much of the info from Maxwell because of WP:OR. No actual Masonic sources are referenced, therefore Maxwell's assertion is speculation. I also removed non-relevant info re: Maxwell's opinion of the origin of the work "British". Alcarillo 15:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of November 30, 2006, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: The article is mostly well-written.  The prose could be tightened up, and there are a handful of awkward constructions (such as "A typical example of Yoda's speech pattern is from Return of the Jedi: 'When 900 years old you reach, look as good you will not.'"), but for the most part these are not serious.  There is some redundancy; for instance, the section about Yoda's personality mentions the speech pattern twice in nonconsecutive paragraphs.  There are a few other instances where re-organization of the prose might benefit the flow of the article.  The lead is too short, and too much of it deals with the etymology issue -- it should go into a little more depth about who Yoda is and why he's important, giving a sort of overview of the article.
:2. Factually accurate?: Borderline.  The article lists references, but, with only a few exceptions, it does not utilize inline citation to "back up" its claims.  The lack of citations is probably the greatest impediment to this article reaching GA status.  The article contains marked unsourced statements.
:3. Broad in coverage?: The article is thorough.  The "Animating Yoda" section could possibly use some further expansion, but the character and his role in the films are treated in depth.  I do not see this as an issue.
:4. Neutral point of view?: There are a few statements that might be construed as POV, lacking sources.  One particularly egregious example is "Yoda, having mastered all seven forms of lightsaber combat, is considered the best duelist in the Jedi Order of his day."  These statements should be removed or their sources cited.
:5. Article stability? Discounting vandalism and reverts, the article appears to be stable.  No issues.
:6. Images?: The images are nice, and the layout is reasonable, but I think using nine movie screenshots begins to strain the rationale for fair use.  I would recommend trimming to perhaps three or four screenshots.  The fountain is licensed under Creative Commons and probably fine.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration.  Thanks for your work so far. 
--Shimeru 21:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would add that the Etymology section is speculative at the moment, and lacking credible sources. Overall, references are lacking and often don't follow Wikipedia formats for citations. An article about such an exalted SW character deserves better. Alcarillo 18:50, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination

message: "and is also a worldly diplomat comparable to Windu. "
Djarcas 18:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which world would that be then? 

message: who ever said that Yoda was 900 exactly? i thought it was closer to 921 or 926. Where is the citation for this? Mace Windu 00:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age again 

message: This article (Yoda) has been vandalised by some idiot. Please remove the stupid remarks they added.
172.181.109.8 15:46, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, the edit you refer to seems to have been reverted.  Just to check, you do know that all articles are created using a wiki?  Thanks, GChriss <always listening><c> 18:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vadalised 

message: There are over 12,000 questions about Yoda worldwide, but none perplex SW fans more than this: Does Yoda have a tail? I think he does. I mean, did you see his weird little feet?! How else could he keep balance? - Rabid Yoda
Is there any proof for this...any at all? Mace Windu 00:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tail?

message: "These skills, in particular, show a far more profound knowledge of the Force than most Jedi Masters or Sith Lords of his time possess."
I read this statement three times and something just doesn't read right... Any better suggestions? --Gleezus 21:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads funny... 

message: Is it just me, or does Yoda bear a ressemblance to the founder of Shotokan Karate, Master Gichin Funakoshi?  Look at pictures of Yoda.  Then look at pictures of Gichin Funakoshi.  I think they look similar.  Even creepier, is that like Yoda, Master Funakoshi was diminiutive, but a very powerful martial artist.  By "powerful" I mean his techniques were so perfect it was pretty much impossible to hit him, and he was so skillful in Karate he could adapt it to any situation.  Also, like Yoda, he never got into many confrontations, and in the same way Yoda is respected by Jedi, Master Funakoshi is respected and revered by Karateka the world over.
I think the parallels are both creepy, and funny.  You know, with the "Jedi" being represented by Karate people, and so on.  I could be wrong though.  Anyone else's opinion is most welcome regarding this.  Also, please, when you compare pictures of Yoda and Master Funakoshi, out of respect for Master Funakoshi (who is actually a real, historic figure), please, try your hardest not to laugh.
Thank you. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 206.63.78.98 (talk) 23:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoda and Shotokan Karate 

message: Yeah i would like to know the answer, he has all of these powers, all of this swordmanship yet that old dude defeat him.--HalaTruth(ሐላቃህ) 00:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yoda was not defeated by Palpatine, but instead retreated because of the even match of their powers.  The Emperor had spent many years of his life concentrating on the dark side of the force, and was such a master that he was capable of hiding his presence from the Jedi Council while still orchestrating a war where each side did not know that he was an agent for the other.  The Emperor's control of the dark side was (In my humble opinion) equal to that of Yoda's control of the light side.  24.163.35.169 07:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: If yoda is so great how he got defeated by the sith

message: I believe that the opening paragraph - "Yoda (voiced by Frank Oz)..." - should be edited to remove "(voiced by Frank Oz)". This seems to indicate that the Yoda character exists only in the mediums where Frank Oz provides the voice. It negates everything regarding Yoda outside of the five films he appears in. The inclusion of Frank Oz as the voice provider for the films should be mention later. --Bentonia School 16:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph & Frank Oz 

message: A Tai-Chi teacher of many many years ago claimed that his teacher's teacher (may have been Cheng Man-Ch'ing) was a consultant for George Lucas and actually provided inspiration for the Yoda character.  This seems unlikely, but... Mr. Lucas might have had some contact with Chinese Tai-Chi/Qi-Gong master, or at least read about such, and may have incorporated some characteristics. The idea of the 'force' in the original three movies very much complies with the more legendary concepts of 氣, "qi" or "chi."  If anyone has information about this, I think it would be very enlightening. Cuvtixo 18:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration for Yoda 

message: It seems out of place and should be omitted. Its not revelent to the character or development. It seems it would be better left for a fansite.
I understand that Yoda's species is unknown. However, it may be of more use to the reader to put 'unknown tridactyl' under spiecies rather then unknown. That's what Wookiepedia does. It's jsut an idea. Wikiisawesome 16:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the point of the "Easter Egg" image from ROTS? 

message: I've changed the image in the infobox to one I got from another website. I changed it because, while the previous image was good, Yoda in it was kinda small, and there was a little too much white space. Here Yoda takes up the whole frame, and there's less white space. Before you change it back, please discuss it here.--Dark Kubrick 22:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of images 

message: I love yoda so much! I named my cat after him. I have a question, how come George Lucas has never answered the questions as to where Yoda comes from. Yoda317 22:39, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cool 

message: I can't remember for the life of me where, but I read somewhere a year or two ago that George Lucas was throwing ideas around to make a movie solely based on Yoda and his exploits becoming a Jedi, also possibly expanding on his origins a bit, too. Anyone know of any projects like that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.199.77.215 (talk) 01:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Movie? 

message: Yes you heard me right. Both him and Darth Vader are to appear in the forth installment to the Soul-series. Source # one & # two. FaithLehaneTheVampireSlayer 00:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: More official news from  star wars.com and a trailer from Namco. FaithLehaneTheVampireSlayer 02:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides your belated post script that you appended after my reversion, nothing in your comments indicated that you were trying to improve the article, or introduce said content. I usually WP:AGF with everyone, but it came off as 1.)Fanboyish 2.)Gossip and 3.)Promotional. That's why I reverted you. No harm done. Wisdom89 (talk) 04:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok thank you. Now I have a question since Yoda does seem to appear in another form of media. Should there be some kind of other appearances section? FaithLehaneTheVampireSlayer 04:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: At one time there was one, I don't remember clearly what happened to it - I believe it only mentioned Yoda's appearance as CGI animation at the MTV movie awards, and parody songs by weird al. It was removed because it was scant and kinda look like misc/trivia. I'd have to say though if more non-trivial examples could be found, it should definitely be reinserted into the article. Looks like you've already taken the first step. Wisdom89 (talk) 04:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I hardly see it as anything like that. I mean that stuff happens a lot. This is a kinda big event among gamers. It's combining a popular game franchise and a popular film franchise. Also there is evidence from more then one party, two of which are from namco and lucas arts. FaithLehaneTheVampireSlayer 04:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To be a playable character in [[Soulcalibur IV]]?  

message: where are his yoda swamp house  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 436873B4 (talk • contribs) 22:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  where 

message: does the section titled Parodies have any thing to do with yoda the jedi master? if not then shouldn't it be moved? - Derob ecnirp (talk) 17:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parodies