Talk:Marc Faber

message: One of the most noteworthy (inflammatory if you're an Obama supporter) comments Marc recently stated was that "Obama made Bush look like a genius", re: economic policies and deficit spending.  For better or worse, this would be a good idea to include IMO. Saigafreak (talk) 19:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  of coure he is notable. 10 times more then is needed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adniim- (talk • contribs) 03:23, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article reads like it could've been written by Faber himself. 75.76.213.161 (talk) 18:03, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Shockingly, I've removed a couple paragraphs that word-for-word duplicate parts of his site.  I have addressed this, and will remove the tag.  --j⚛e deckertalk 19:43, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.dailyreckoning.com.au/investment-booms/2007/03/08/
*:Triggered by \bdailyreckoning\.(?:com|org|co\.uk)\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: If anyone wants to be truly responsible, they could flesh out his predictions and warnings section to show the hundreds, not exaggerating, times Faber has been wrong. 
It's easy to take credit for calling a top when you make that call over and over and over again.  But this wiki is very lopsided (like many of the wiki entries for these guys who were eventually right and that's all anyone remembers).
Also missing from this wiki, as it's probably just completely opaque are any of his performance results.  He had a prominent position in a firm that collapsed after 12 years.  Kudos.  Then he 'started his own company'.  And that's it?  If nothing else, we truly need more information on why this person should even have a wiki entry, and how if at all, his role in markets is even relevant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.103.173.229 (talk) 21:03, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constantly Bearish, always calling for recessions, corrections, and market tops, and almost always wrong. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Marc Faber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121003023540/http://new.gloomboomdoom.com:80/public/pSTD.cfm?pageSPS_ID=6000 to http://new.gloomboomdoom.com/public/pSTD.cfm?pageSPS_ID=6000
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071026081010/http://www.gloomboomdoom.com:80/public/pSTD.cfm?pageSPS_ID=6000 to http://www.gloomboomdoom.com/public/pSTD.cfm?pageSPS_ID=6000
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090925213040/http://www.gloomboomdoom.com:80/public/pSTD.cfm?pageSPS_ID=5200 to http://www.gloomboomdoom.com/public/pSTD.cfm?pageSPS_ID=5200
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:43, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Two IP users have blanked an entire section of the article. I've reverted the second one. Both IP addresses have only edited this article, and a geolocation search says that both originate in Thailand (the same country in which Faber is now based, according to the article). Both edits seem to suggest that they were restoring, not blanking, information, but blanked they did. One claimed to be a "world authority" (on what?) and accused editors of being "wikipedia idiots." Suspicious. Anyway, please only make constructive edits to Wikipedia. If you think that something should be removed, please discuss it here and give reasons.50.191.21.222 (talk) 16:52, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't blank sections 

message: Ready to erupt.  --Wikipietime (talk) 22:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The development has now been separately added to three different sections of the article. Mannymanny1 (talk) 01:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, it doesn't need to be stated 3 times. I'll take it out of 'Investment Views'. Not sure whether it belongs in 'Writings' or 'Controversies', though. I'll let someone else decide :) --Marjaliisa (talk) 03:54, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I removed my contribution from the 'Writings' section in favor of the 'Controversies' section. Mannymanny1 (talk) 14:42, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wall Street’s Faber says U.S. wouldn’t have made as much ‘progress’ if colonized by blacks 

message: , the quote  is NOT an admission of racism. Particularly since he states in the same interview  Now, you and I may think he’s a racist. But, our opinions are not relevant. The article must be phrased in a neutral point of view. O3000 (talk) 21:25, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Where did I say that? Of course I think he made racist remarks. But, you keep saying that he "admitted" that he was a racist. His non sequitur is not an admission. O3000 (talk) 21:40, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contentious heading 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Marc Faber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=avgZDYM6mTFA
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121004072425/http://www.financial-gurus.com/gurus/2134/Marc-Faber to http://www.financial-gurus.com/gurus/2134/Marc-Faber/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified