lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John school

message: I've tagged the article as NPOV for its basic advocacy of this approach toward men caught soliciting prostitutes and its failure to include perspectives critical of that approach, which are numerous. I've changed some of the more egregiously NPOV statements, like "educating men about the realities of prostitution". At some point, I (or some other editor) will expand this article to draw on more sources and report the issue more neutrally, but in the meantime, the tag should stay up. -Iamcuriousblue 21:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article now includes perspectives critical of the approach, so I think 12 years after this tag was put up, there has been enough improvement to this article that it is pretty neutral and we can remove the tag.  Aroundthewayboy (talk) 00:15, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree. I've also changed the class from stub to start in view of how much the article has expanded. --John B123 (talk) 17:31, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV tag

message: "courts may sentence men to attend a john school": does this mean that only people who belong to this gender can be sentenced to attend these schools? Apokrif (talk) 16:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gender
Talk:Evangelical Free Church of Canada

message: The Evangelical Free Church of Canada is the denomination behind Trinity Western University. Although it is the Canadian chapter of the Evangelical Free Church of America, it operates independently enough to warrant an entry of its own. This is why I feel it should be listed. Blanchardb 21:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You may wish to familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia guidelines before proceeding.  Articles in Wikipedia must be about notable subjects and the notability of those subjects must be verifiable.  It is not enough for an organization merely to exist -- it must have somehow distinguished itself from its peers and become notable, and that notability must be corroborated by independent third-party arm's-length sources (such as magazine articles, etc.).  If I can help further, leave a note on my talk page.  Accounting4Taste 21:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

text: The Board of Directors of TWU includes members appointed by the EFCA and the EFCC.  Also, the EFCC is a separate organization - I believe it was "planted" by the EFCA, but is independent.  --Philosopher Let us reason together. 02:46, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:(You're My) Soul and Inspiration

message: I'd say this is almost a  Good Article. --NormalAsylum (t) 05:17, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No where near current criteria. Fails WP:LEAD, WP:V etc. It's even marked with a stub template! Regards, SunCreator (talk) 19:19, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: First off, that's a few years old, so I'm sure there's no need to reply as he probably won't see it.  Second, this was my first article, so I have a nice little spot for it in my wikiheart.  I'm pretty busy with school stuff right now, but if you'll please not rip it a new one (please!), I'll get on here over the next month or so and make some needed changes, like a charts section, a stand alone lead, and more citation.  And more encyclopedic tone.  I mean, obviously you don't have to, but I would really really appreciate it.  Thank you.  :) --Leodmacleod (talk) 21:17, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Your welcome.  Wikipedia is work in progress so small improvements here and there and eventually it adds up to something decent. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 21:35, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk:What Is This Thing Called Science?

message: A nice outline and summary of Chalmers is available online: What is This Thing Called Science. I could not find any author listed, or whether or not there is a copyright issues with just copying the outline. Someone with more time and knowledge of the book could provide a service by putting a suitably abbreviated version of the outline into the very brief and unsatisfactory current article. Asaduzaman (talk) 01:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice Summary Available 

message: Books on Demand and self-publishing books generally are not considered a WP:reliable source. But the author is cited in other WP articles, while the volume has an OCLC master code added by a certain number of university libraries.
Hence, it seems to be an authoritative source. Furthermore, it gives two points of weakness, just to avoid to have online an advertising WP article. The source has been published in 2011 with concerns to a reference work whose first edition dates back to 1975. So, the judgement can be got as definitive and with a very low likelihood to be overcome by new reviewed editions. Kind regards, Philosopher81sp (talk) 23:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Bewal

message: The PTCL provides the main network of landline telephone with minority shares of other operators. All major mobile phone companies operating in Pakistan provide service in Bewal. Pakistan's Broadband revolution has had a significant impact on telecommunications in Bewal. DSL internet also has a major coverage in the city with PTCL the main stakeholders. Recently a high speed 3G Network, EVO Nitro, was also set up by PTCL with maximum speeds of 9.3 Mbit/s to add up to the already established EVO 3G Network. Though localized, it is the first instance in the history of telecommunication that EVDO RevB technology was commercially launched.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.154.152.110 (talk) 17:57, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telecommunication 
Talk:Turnaround (music)

message: I don't understand this:
: Turnarounds are based off of the Plagal Cadence in which a musical phrase ends in a dominant chord, usually a Major Fifth.
Plagal cadences don't end in dominant chords, and a "Major Fifth" doesn't quite describe a chord either. Pre10s 21:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagal cadence

message: This entire section looks like the conclusion of a magazine article on "the magic of turnarounds." The one citation doesn't support the rest of the information given. I'm putting the tags in, please refer to talk here. Thanks.BassHistory (talk) 11:19, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Creative potential" section: NPOV? OR? 

message: I have proposed at Talk:Tadd_Dameron_turnaround that the page Tadd Dameron turnaround be merged into this page.BassHistory (talk) 08:31, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No reason given, no support. Discussion closed with no merge. Hyacinth (talk) 00:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Tadd Dameron turnaround]] proposed merger
Talk:They Also Ran

message: A: This page is two years old and has no info. B: There are several books with this title. Delete. --Arperry 21:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: Why do we have references to this book as a novel? It is a non-fiction work, albeit written in a more casual style than most biographies or histories. KConWiki (talk) 18:20, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Novel?
Talk:Wunü Mountain

message: please provide the Korean name of this Wu Nu Shan. Goguryeo history is a history that occured in the lands of modern-day countries of China, North Korea, and South Korea. It is quite necessary to include this information.
This Wu Nu Shan is probably Jolbon. Jolbon was the first capital of Goguryeo. The capital of Goguryeo was changed to Guknae Seong during the reign of Goguryeo's second ruler, King Yuri.--74.232.227.167 20:00, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In Korean, Wǔ Nǚ Shān is 오녀산 Ohnyeosan. Jolbon is a region which includes the small mountains Wǔ Nǚ Shān and Gungnae, which both became mountain-fortresses or city fortresses. André de StCoeur (talk) 23:36, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

message: In Samguk Sagi, it mentions Jumong settled next to the river and lived in the thatched house as he didn't have enough assets to build palace when he arrived. The city or fortress may have been built later. I will provide more information as I find more. Kadrun (talk) 03:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  For the objection part in the article
Talk:Captain Mike Across America

message: It sure sounds like the same movie to me, I think Moore just edited it down, should the article be merged?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.187.154.49 (talk) 03:59, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is This Movie "Slacker Uprising"?

message: From CNN's Larry King:
KING: That will come out during the convention?
MOORE: I'm going to get it out in a very mass produced way through --
KING: What are you calling it?
MOORE: "We were This Close." I want people to remember that we had these arenas every night; 15,000 people would show up. It was incredible. You actually could see the early beginnings of this massive movement now that's behind Obama. It's only going to continue to get bigger. I think that's a very positive thing for the country.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0804/30/lkl.01.html
Should this article be renamed/moved?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.123.160.3 (talk) 20:43, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: We Were This Close
File talk:Destruction of Buddhas March 21 2001.jpg

message: Given the recent events on another Buddha statue within Afghanistan, the removal of this image on Sept 17th 2007 which in the next few days might be a tad premature? - Casual reader of Wikipedia
This shot claims to be the only picture of the event, why remove it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.118.224 (talk) 08:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Base conditions

message: 1) I don't think this article gives enough context. 2) There must be other areas, besides flow measurement, in which Base conditions are used. Biscuittin 21:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Choreoathetosis

message: Most of this page appears to be copied verbatim from the wemove.org page, which specifically says its content is copyrighted. The offending paragraphs will now be removed. 
EDIT: To be fair, I should add that very tiny changes were made compared to the original, but changing the order of two parts of a sentence or replacing a few words with synonyms does not strike me as avoiding the fundamental problem that the text was stolen almost verbatim from the aforementioned page. digfarenough (talk) 21:44, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyvio 
Talk:Spanish battleship España

message: Article says : "In 1920 she joined the celebration of Chile's centennary"
Chile independence was in 1810... ¿Centenary in 1920?
--Takashi kurita (talk) 11:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake

message: 1st says :
"In January 1924 she grounded in Chilean waters on the return to Spain, being refloated with some difficulty"
Then says :
"During these operations, she went aground at Cape Tres Forcas, Morocco, near Melilla, in fog on 26 August 1923"
España was lost in 1923... impossible she ground on the return to Spain in 1924. And ¿4 years in Chile? 
thx
--Takashi kurita (talk) 13:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All ok now... thanks--Takashi kurita (talk) 04:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More

message: The spanish naval jack, is official sice 11 December 1945 (see in www.mde.es official web ministery of defese... previously, spain use spanish flag like jack
sorry for my short english
--Takashi kurita (talk) 15:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish Naval Jack
Talk:Acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy

message: There are various articles to be found in Google Scholar,
e.g. .  --Coppertwig 21:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevant articles

message: The page had multiple errors that was fixed:
AMPPE is not an infectious disease, it is an inflammatory chorioretinopathy. The disease is generally considered a self-limited disease and thats why no therapy is needed. Neurologic complications are rare. I removed the external links too because they were not really useful links. Treatment and diagnosis sections were added.Kiatdd (talk) 06:15, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: AMPPE
Talk:The Teenagers

message: This article has exactly one citation, which is to a wayback machine copy of a blog repost of an obituary. Nearly all of the content here can be ripped out, unless someone comes up with citations. MrDemeanour (talk) 08:17, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Tsiigehtchic

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it only contains the basic information on the topic, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 22:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Firearms/Assessment

message: I tried to use the "deferred" assessment on Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. The project box is a nested box, and the other projects show their rating when nested, like "WikiProject FOO (Rated B-class)", but once I switched to defered, their is no rating on the firearms projectbox. Maybe it should say "(Rated deferred)" Arthurrh 21:58, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the proper value was "def", but I changed the banner template to include "deferred" as a possible value.  As well, I fixed the issue you described.  —Thernlund (Talk | Contribs) 22:25, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deferred rating 

message: According to the rating criteria, it would be "Top" priority b/c more than ten percent of military/civilian guns had a flash pan at some point in history. Suggestions? --Laber□T 13:16, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to rate [[Flash pan]]?
Talk:Centerville Senior High School

message: This post only includes athletic information. Please help expand this article by adding educational information as well.
Stisul 21:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Emerald Isle (Northwest Territories)

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it only contains the basic information on the topic, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 22:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Wekweètì

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it only contains the basic information on the topic, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 22:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ulukhaktok, Northwest Territories which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 01:16, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Ruthlane Uy Asmundson

message: Davis is a sufficiently large city that the mayor is quite possibly notable--and certainly asserting that someone is the mayor of a city is enough of an assertion to pass speedy. I wonder at the tagging. 
However, the article should be checked for copyvio.DGG (talk) 22:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Blatant puff piece, needs rewriting in neutral tone with secondary, reliable sources. --Stfg (talk) 12:36, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Talk:The Capris

message: This article needs a radical re-write; both to reduce the promotional fancruft, and to insert some citations.
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 19:41, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

message: Just got started by cleaning up the Lead section. Soon, the article will be at least 90% smaller, and the above (long standing) complaints/issues will be addressed and resolved.  Tapered (talk) 00:47, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Very nearly finished. Will contact editor responsible for 'boxes.' Tapered (talk) 06:01, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops! Need to explain vast deletions. This was a one-hit wonder group that had a sort of resurgence when their de facto leader, Nick Santo wrote another great song. Before my edit, the article was chock full of undocumented minutiae, which had nothing to do with their notoriety, and everything to do with people who hadn't done anything important wanting their names and scribings in Wikipedia. That trash has been taken out. Tapered (talk) 07:15, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, I loved "There's a Moon Out Tonight," and jumped up and danced around when I heard "Morse Code of Love." I'm from the same part of the world and similar background to the Capris. Tapered (talk) 07:17, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Large Rewrite
Talk:Kakisa

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it only contains the basic information on the topic, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 22:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Norman Wells

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it only contains the basic information on the topic, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 22:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Fort Good Hope, Northwest Territories which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 01:15, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Form 4473

message: Coloseum Software ( http://www.coloseumsoftware.com/ ) also provides an e4473 application that is approved by the ATF, although there is some controversy regarding intellectual property issues regarding the ATF software.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.150.194.249 (talk) 22:58, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  e4473
Talk:Nate Schierholtz

message: I was curious about what company Vai Schierholtz was sponsored by so I did an internet search. I didn't find anything. If anyone knows what company he skates for, please add it to the article. If he was professional at one time and not sponsored now, the article should be updated. Truthfully, I would be surprised if a 50 year old man would be skateboarding professionally, though I would love to be shown that I am wrong!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by PMsfo (talk • contribs) 02:59, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Nate Schierholtz's father, Vai, really a professional skateboarder? 
Talk:The Chiffons

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 11:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: The author claims that The Chiffons sued George Harrison.  There is no record of The Chiffons having ever claimed copyright ownership of the song "He's So Fine".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.191.102.30 (talk) 15:07, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: He's So Fine
Talk:RKBA

message: I recommend deletions based on WP:NOTE- it's not notable, WP:DICT - this looks like just a definition. Arthurrh 22:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick Google search under RKBA seems to indicate that it is a widely used acronym. Citations can be added to improve the article. --mervyn 17:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Changaa

message: The article claims: "The alcoholic content is sometimes increased by adding substances like jet fuel, embalming fluid or battery acid, which has the effect of giving the beverage more 'kick'." This makes little sense as none of those substances contain ethanol or any other alcohol to my knowledge. Attys (talk) 01:50, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious claims 
Talk:List of Dacian chiefs

message: These Dacian chiefs are hard to check; Zoltes has a Romanian Wikipedia reference but the article that links to it doesn't seem to break Dacian kings and Dacian chiefs into separate lists but rather seems to have some larger list.
My Web Browser wouldn't display this article's reference (www.dacia.nemuritoare.go.ro); it seemed to be a referrer to http://www.gk.ro/sarmizegetusa/ (which failed with HTTP status 503: Service Unavailable.)
Some related information is visible in the Google Cache there.
A Web search also finds this related Yahoo group: tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/dacologika/ in Romanian. Nearly Human 22:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Larks

message: no mention of tarheel slims recordings with dan pickett from the early 40s?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnleepimp (talk • contribs) 16:32, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no mention of Tarheel Slim's recordings for the Gotham label in 1949, which is an omission which should be rectified (somehow - actually, I think he should probably have his own article), but were they actually with Pickett (who also lacks an article)?  This discography implies that the two were packaged together on the same album, but not necessarily recorded together.  User:StefanWirz would know as it's his discography!  Ghmyrtle (talk) 20:27, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither mention of Tarheel Slim / Dan Pickett recordings in Robert M.W. Dixon & John Godrich: Blues & Gospel Records 1902 - 1943, 3rd ed. 1982 ("early" 1940s) nor in Les Fancourt & Bob McGrath: The Blues Discography 1943 - 1970.- Vancouver 2006 --- those are the sources I usually do consult --- any additional info (from reliable source, not from hearsay ;-) appreciated !!! StefanWirz (talk) 16:24, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tarheel Slim and Dan Pickett
Talk:Henry (Obotrite prince)

message: Currently, the article only got three inline citations. Both "Herrmann, Joachim (1970). Die Slawen in Deutschland (in German and Latin)" and "Thompson, James Westfall (1928). Feudal Germany, Volume II." has clearly been used to write the article. Perhaps even bordering meaningless changes to the original text close enough to be considered plagiarism. Someone needs to find the necessary information in these two works and cite them properly in the text.
To give you a head start, here are the link to James Westfall Thompson's work archived on archive.org. I believe it's the foundation for much of the information in this article and it's easy to search for specific information with the search tool.
Please write if you have any need of assistance. Voy178 (talk) 00:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for more Inline citations February 2024
Talk:Old Port of Marseille

message: This article is simply appalling. What grew from the hellenic settlement in the Panier was always the old part of the town. Everything is properly explained in the article on Marseille. This article is written in franglais and is uninformative and unencyclopedic. It does not properly cite its sources. It makes no reference to the
original article on Marseille. A careful english translation of the corresponding french article would be a good idea, but not this kind of shoddy scribbling. Unless
a proper english version of the corresponding french WP article is produced, I will recommend this article for deletion. --Mathsci 22:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now retranslated the French wikipedia page on the Vieux-Port, also including some of the previous material by Franchute and some details from the main page on Marseille. The list of monuments and churches next to the Vieux-Port is still incomplete, but needs to be properly sourced (names of churches, etc): this can all be found on the French WP portail for Marseille (I think). The museums of the old (Greek and) Roman docks could also be mentioned. A previous summary I put on the history page of the article has negatives in the wrong place because it was dispatched prematurely owing to a glitch on my computer. I meant to write "appalling inaccuracies" and "written in franglais". The spirit of the article, however, was correct and I apologize if I slightly over-reacted. Nevertheless, it was an incomplete translation of the French WP page, marred by inaccuracies both in translation and in some historical facts. I hope that my translation is OK. --Mathsci 10:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy of this article