lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Monoclinic crystal system

message: I would like to rename this and other articles so that all of the articles describing the seven crystal systems are named the same way. For example, I would like to rename this article Monoclinic crystal system. That way it woun't be confued with the general gemetric shape. Any objections? O. Prytz 17:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See my response at Talk:Orthorhombic, ditto for here. Vsmith 00:03, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change?

message: It must be possible to write an intro using a more readable language, even if less precise. For instance:
"The monoclinic crystal system is a way of packing atoms or molecules in a regular lattice, such that the unit cell of repetition has edges of unequal length, and where in each corner, one of the edges meet each of the other two at right angles, while the other two edges meet each other at some oblique angle."
What do you think?
Cacadril (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make the introduction intelligible to ordinary readers 

message: On the table in the "Crystal Classes" section, there are 3 examples of minerals in the monoclinic class, one of which is Hilgardite. I don't know whether this page is incorrect or if the Hilgardite Wikipedia page is incorrect, but the Hilgardite page lists it as Triclinic.
Acorneater (talk) 20:52, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example "Hilgardite" is listed as Triclinic, rather than Monoclinic in the Hilgardite Wikipedia page
Talk:Youth development

message: As I just added, 'youth development' is almost always used to talk about interventions to promote 'positive youth development'.  Child development, adolescent development, or early adult development are different topics.  There are other posts on this topic, and we are currently adding a long piece on 'adolescent development' that will disambiguate from this one.
The last section of the article refers to things normally discussed under 'youth development'.  The current article is misleading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nancydarling (talk • contribs) 16:11, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article combines two different topics
Talk:Orthorhombic crystal system

message: When we describe a base centered orthorhombic system, how is the base defined? I think that part needs to be added.
Because there are 3 different lattice parameters, how to decide the base? 
Not only that, each page on each Bravais Lattices doesnt contain enough of the properties, of the crystal, like
1)No of atoms contained.
2)Co-ordination number.
3)Packing fraction.
------
The # of atoms contained and the packing fraction depend on the actual molecule in the crystal; they are not properties of the lattice structure itself.
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.219.49.9 (talk) 14:09, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some doubts arise. 

message: I've been looking all over and I can't figure out what the orthorhombic system has to do with a rhombus, as all the faces are rectangles.  The article could do well to contain such origin information.Nicknicknickandnick (talk) 19:59, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not widely known, but there is another setting for the orthorhombic that uses a unit cell of a right rhombic prism. This is the reason why it's orthorhombic. Ortho=rectangle. Rhombic=rhombus. Both have the same symmetry which is why this crystal system has two possible axes.--Officer781 (talk) 03:20, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of term orthorhombic?  Where is there any rhombus? 

message: Could the figure showing the primitive lattice be changes so it doesn't look so much like a cube?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.156.157.1 (talk) 16:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve Figure 

message: It seems that three-dimensional pictures of cells are incorrect. In the “Right rhombic prism unit cell” row, the first picture and the second one seems to be misplaced, so does the third one and the fourth one. I can’t confirm, though. --Ný(rönn)-Holtredéþch-Deskrúð / NyholtredehnDiscussion! 12:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Pictures in “Bravais lattices” Section
Talk:Digital magnetofluidics

message: I have just made a few changes to this article, mainly adding wikilinks.  The one big thing that I changed was The consequent bipolar interactions among the particles form chain-like clusters, which originally was di-polar.  Di-polar is a red link and I've never heard of it before.  Additionally the Bi-polar page doesn't have anything on bi-polar in this context (note to self check all links before clicking save).  If someone who knows a bit more about these things could check this for me I'd appreciate it. RicDod 17:40, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. The original statement referred to magnetic dipoles. What this article really needs is someone to check the existing references and expand the list (as magnetically sensitive fluids have been written about for decades now), but I'm not in a position to do this at present. --Christopher Thomas 02:13, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Di-polar
Talk:Steven Vikash Chand

message: what was his religion per conversion?
: Unconfirmed,  but I heard it was Hinduism. --Omnicog 22:24, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous discussion without header

message: Much reporting on this topic is handicapped by a Canadian-wide publication ban, although I'll quote the judge who issued the 2006 ban that "The ban does not apply to information obtained outside the court". Any information I put on these pages is footnoted to its legitimate source, and nothing comes from any personal knowledge, discussions or attendance at legal hearings. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead)  03:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Publication Ban

message: This source was used in the article and i have substituted it with a {cn} tag because it does not meet basic requirements of WP:RS. It is not clear: Who is the author? Does the author and publisher have a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy? Who is the publisher? Who owns the website?... IQinn (talk) 02:53, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable source [http://thefacesbehind.net/ "thefacesbehind.net"]
Talk:Irish showband

message: The article needs a NPOV-rewrite. It is an interesting read, but a more neutral approach would suit Wikipedia better. 90.18.44.89 (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: This article is written in the style of a parody of meandering Irish country bumpkinese. Amusing though it may be, up to a point, the whole thing needs to be torn out from its foundations and rebuilt from scratch.
97.124.210.152 (talk) 01:29, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the worse examples of prose have been cut out - it was certainly very POV and made several assertions without providing references. Irish Wikipedians' notice board has also been notified, so someone more familiar may be able to improve it further.Autarch (talk) 18:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Destroy and rebuild. 

message: How did they handle licensing for public performances of contemporary pop songs?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.138.223.87 (talk) 21:50, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ASCP, BMI, and  SESAC
Talk:Fluent (disambiguation)

message: I do not see any evidence that this subject is notable. Anyway, since this is a disambiguation page, it should only have entries for subjects we have an article about. Tizio 12:14, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fluent (artist)

message: There's no article on this yet in Wikipedia (Fluent interface has to do with programming), so I provided an external link as the main one and then linked Microsoft Office to its article. There's currently no mention of the Fluent interface on the Office article, so if anyone wants to create a full article for it or add something to the Office one, feel free to update the links here accordingly. --SSTwinrova 04:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MS Office 2007 Fluent interface
Talk:Sciara

message: I'm listing this page for a speedy not just because it consists because of a single fragment of a sentence, but also because a google search for Sciara, Italy, shows that Sciara is somewhere between Abruzzo and Marche, rather than Sicily, as the article claims. Gershwinrb 18:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy
Talk:San Isabel National Forest

message: Please add a map showing the boundaries of San Isabel National Forest.  The map with the red pin on it gives no sense whatsoever of its size and precise location. 2601:281:D47E:1920:CD47:7A14:E3D6:444E (talk) 20:53, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add a map showing boundaries
Talk:Somerville High School (Massachusetts)

message: The entire article is taken from Somerville High School's website, word for word.  130.64.102.105 (talk) 13:48, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism?

message: Changed the title so that it would work w/ the redirect page SHS06 18:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are the Sturniolo triplets really notable enough to be on here? They do not have a Wikipedia page, and there are plenty of teenagers with large tik tok followings. There seems to be a minor edit war adding and removing their names since at least December 2022. Can we come to a concensus on weather they should be included? TIMOTHEVS 03:42, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni
Talk:1998–99 UEFA Champions League

message: This article has serious neutrality problems; the article has a blatant Manchester United bias - "Why do it the easy way? Indeed, the Red Devils appeared to have the class and confidence to deal with any situation", and "But then a miracle happened". The article only seems to mention Manchester United - fair enoguh if the article was about the final - but it is the whole tournament. Manchester United is repeatedly emboldened, many stories of other teams can be included here instead.
Narsamson 18:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Monica Abbott

message: I've reverted a picture based edit, but it seems the prev is no good either, not knowing what to do i'll have to let you guys decide, sorry -Benbread 18:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The way the page has evolved has produced a page which is pretty clunky. There's three tags on the page - one of which has been there for over 10 years!
Monica Abbott has obviously achieved a lot, but I'm going to try and present the accomplishments in a better way, add more sources, update it, etc
MaskedSinger (talk) 15:28, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: After three weeks of research and then drafting up changes, implemented them today. I'm toast. Going to lie down for a while. MaskedSinger (talk) 13:33, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamp Page
Category talk:Fictional pigs

message: If I'm correct, Rocksteady is in fact not a pig, but rather a anthropomorphic animal of what is presumably the rhino family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.233.193.178 (talk • contribs) 6 June 2006
:You are correct. However, Bebop is an anthropomorphic warthog, and they share an article, so Bebop and Rocksteady is in both :Category:Fictional pigs and :Category:Fictional rhinos. --Paul A 09:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Ruin (poem)

message: I've reverted the addition made by anon user as copyvio. Although I am unable to find the source directly, the indirect evidence is:
#The prose is professional and polished, written by an experienced expert scholar.
#The entry is full of typo's and spelling errors. Someone obviously manually typed this in from another source. One doesn't write high-quality material full of hasty typos.
#There is missing text, for example this line:
::Again we can identify the ubi sunt motif
:Again? This is the first time it is mentioned. Obviously there is additional material where the ubi sunt motif was mentioned that was not copied in.
If the anon user could please log in with a userID and identify themselves and where this material came from it can be restored. 
--Stbalbach 18:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: revert

message: I have no idea why someone (User:Ghirlandajo) saw fit to wipe this page and replace it with a disambiguation page for two articles, one of them brand new and some obscure reference to Ukranian history.  This is an English encyclopedia and this poem is historically significant to the English language.
At any rate, two articles is no reason for a disambiguation page.  The new and less significant use of the term is sufficiently covered by an OtherUses4 tag at the top.  Please do not wipe articles without discussion.  I have undone this, added the otheruses tag, and made the The Ruin (poem) article redirect back to this.  Fourdee 02:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article wiping, disambig
Talk:Israeli folk dance

message: This sentence seems, how should I put it, quite politically charged? I can't really tell what it's trying to say about folk dance, but it does seem to convey a certain ideology, which seems in contradiction with WP:NPOV. —ajf (talk) 14:11, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  “the dancing associated with the normal activities of a nation in its own country ceased”
Talk:Corporate branding

message: Could someone please develop a little bit more what makes a family branding and what makes a corporate branding? Is corporate branding simply a type of family branding that uses the trade name of a company? Could we have some examples of what is clear corporate branding? For what I understood, Coca-Cola and Nokia are good examples of corporate branding, because they always associate their products with the parent company. However, GlaxoSmithKline is an example of a company that uses family branding but not corporate branding in particular because their major consumer brands such as Aquafresh, Lucozade and Horlicks has no emphasis in the association with the parent company (GlaxoSithKline).
Did I get it right? Can we develop on this a little bit? I am saying "can we" because I am currently studying for a marketing exam and I am more willing to learn than to contribute in this case ;). Thank you! --Pinnecco 18:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What differentiates Corporate Branding from family branding?
Talk:The Mug House

message: this is perfectly acceptable article and is very relevant. It also does not meet the speedy deletion criteria as it is still in the early stages of development. Furthermore this is the only pub in the UK which is situated in a graveyard and therefore has hightened notability.
:Ok.  I just wanted to see some evidence that it's unique in some way (I imagine there are many pubs in the UK!). Supadawg - Talk 18:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: May I draw your attention to articles such as that of The Bear which is a public house in Oxford? That is also a very short article about a public house and a similar argument could be used there. I do hope to expand the article soon and add photographs. --Newton2 18:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and I have tagged the article and will leave a note on the editor's page. I look forward to continued improvement of this article. RadioKirk talk to me 19:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your patience and I hope to build this article up over time --Newton2 19:05, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Sources differ between whether this is the only Pub in the UK in a churchyard, or, is one out of two British pubs in a churchyard. If the latter is true, I cannot find the other pub mentioned. Ollieisanerd (talk) 16:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only British pub in a churchyard?
Talk:Thomas Berthold

message: Caps and goal figures in the article likely contain European cup/Domestic cup data in addition to Domestic League data (this is very certain based on this user's previous edits containing similar information . Please correct this issue and leave a note here, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Alfmaster#Footballers.27_European_goals, to warn this person about putting improper information on Wikipedia. --Palffy 21:10, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They seem to be league only according to this:  ArtVandelay13 00:35, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious Information
Talk:Diplomatic bag

message: Updated dead link. --Ddrager 18:43, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! — Matt Crypto 19:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: badly written 160.39.213.109 17:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a wiki. You can improve it. — Matt Crypto 17:18, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor 

message: please?76.105.211.236 (talk) 03:42, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Of what? It doesn't have to be an actual bag. It can be a shipping container or anything to hold stuff. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we get a pic? 

message: It wasn't entirely clear to me whether shipping, say, cigars or guns in a diplomatic container itself violates the Vienna Convention. There's a big old discussion of limiting the contents of diplomatic bags at The Straight Dope. Right now I've retitled the section "Unusual shipments," but if anyone has a better name (clearly these things violate the spirit of the pouch, whether every single incident is a violation of the treaty or not) or better information do correct.24.6.1.56 (talk) 23:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Violations" => "Unusual shipments" 

message: The following sentences have been in the article from its creation in 2004 and marked "citation needed" for ten years, since early 2008.
:An illustration is the strenuous protest made by German diplomats in Poland in the late 1920s when a cypher machine being shipped to the German Embassy in Warsaw – a commercial version of the famous Enigma machine – was mistakenly not marked as protected baggage and was opened, under protest, by Polish Customs. It was released to them, supposedly without many apologies (and with still more protest), but had perhaps been subjected to inspection by Polish cryptography personnel.
Many unsourced repetitions or paraphrases can now be found online but their use as references here would risk being WP:CIRCULAR. Fortunately the article will be fine without this particular story as an example. I'll remove it. I'll also mark the previous text in the Cryptography section as needing citation; arguably, the 2008 tag applied to those sentences too, but that may not have been obvious. 92.19.28.93 (talk) 14:08, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enigma
Talk:Stephen Macht

message: The source of the allegation that producer Jon Macht is a cousin of Stephen Macht is not reliable documentation and is actually wrong. This matter may be viewed as a he said she said dispute, but absent reliable sourcing it is better in this instance not to post a fact that cannot be confirmed. Actually, I have communicated directly with Stephen Macht and he says he is not related to Jon Macht. I know that such "independent research" is not acceptable as such in Wikipedia, but the bottom line here is that the disputed fact should not be included. Myron (talk) 17:03, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cousin of Jon Macht? 
Talk:Vestigiality/Archive 01

message: "Because vestigial organs can be used as supporting evidence for evolution, some creationists oppose the idea."
This, I think, is vague.  Does this mean that some creationists deny the existence of the appendix?
--cuiusquemodi 21:35, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: From article

message: (moved by endy from talk page)
What do you mean by "this belongs to an encyclopaedic article" on the Vestigial Organ article?  The content of the article clearly states that it relates to evolution (not creationism).
* Well, this is actually neither about evolution nor about creationism - it's about a Vestigial Organ. It is absolutely NPOV to write that this argument is used in the evolution vs. creationism debate. Note that I do NOT mess with your belief, but this is an ongoing debate with opposing views. You should not simply ignore evolutionist arguments by deleting them, as this is not fair the other way round. It is absolutely legitimate to keep this sentence in the article, so if you have another view, you can add a sentence why this argument is doubted by creationists.
Be Blessed,
Endymi0n 08:02, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of evolutionist evidence sentence by unknown user

message: "Many people maintain that the coccyx is a remnant of a lost tail." Not only do many people maintain this, but it is actually true. During embryotic development, humans have a tail for a short period of time. As a matter of fact, all mammals have a tail at one point in their development (this is a trait, like hair, that is shared by all mammals). This is a fact, check out any biology or anatomy & physiology book and this will most likely be in there. I'll try to find an appropriate reference for this, but for the time being, I'm leaving the article alone.
"Because vestigial organs can be used as supporting evidence for evolution, some creationists oppose the idea." A reference for this would be nice. I'm sure its true, but how exactly do they "oppose" the idea? I think this could be rephrased "Because vestigial organs are often used as supporting evidence for evolution, some creationists oppose the validity of the theory/idea." (Not sure if it would be more correctly called a theory.) Fuzzform 17:52, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding vestigial tails
Talk:Islamic Courts militia

message: The merger would be a good thing in my view as the Courts Union article has references unless you want to have one article on the party and one on its militia. Capitalistroadster 18:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've gone ahead and merged this article into Islamic Court Union.  A check to make sure that all relevant info has gone over and there are no redundancies would be appreciated.  Thanks, BT 19:14, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Computer vision

message: Currently this paragraph throws both technics "image processing" and "image analysis" together because they are both processing 2d images. But the rest of the chapter does describe them both as transforming images and producing images as output, not text.
This is wrong. It does not fit for "image analysis". Image analysis is explicitly meant to figure out the content of the image and describe it. 77.179.161.248 (talk) 07:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related fields, Distinction, image processing and image analysis: Wrong description.
Talk:Palais de Justice, Paris

message: Should there truly be semicolons at the end of the entries of the bulleted list? Isn't the idea of non-cohesivity brought about by the fact that it is a bulleted list? Doug L. 22:49, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulleted list 

message: I didn't see any discussion on the talk page of the removal of a large part of the content of the article, which was moved to the article on the Palais de la Cité.  While I'm glad to more content in that article, the Palais de Justice has its own points of interest and its own history, which has been completely removed.   There should be at least some illustrations and descriptions of the Palais de Justice in the article on that topic, at the risk of having some duplication with the Palais de la Cité article.   
I welcome your thoughts and comments on this.  Cordially,  SiefkinDR (talk) 14:01, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of discussion on removal of content 

message: The article on the Palace of Justice needs a history section, like all the other articles on monuments.  It is not simply a sub-article of the Palais de la Cité.Cordially, SiefkinDR (talk) 12:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section - adding comment