lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jayanta Hazarika

message: please kindly lock this page from vandalism.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.245.46.58 (talk) 20:41, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  lock this page 

message: Since it was difficult to find a PD portrait image of Jayanta Hazarika, I have uploaded a painting by myself. But, there may be a question of identifiability, as I have found many times that sometimes others fail to find the similarity. So, if other editors who have seen Jayanta Hazarika's photograph find this not representative, then it should be removed. With thanks.উদ্দীপতালুকদাৰ (talk) 16:31, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good resemblance, Uddip.  I approve this portrait and deeply appreciate your effort. Chaipau (talk) 16:49, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  image of Jayanta Hazarika 

message: The article has been re-written from scratch. Can the fanPOV tag can be removed?- উদ্দীপতালুকদাৰ (talk) 11:57, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV fan tag
Talk:Cosmo Warrior Zero

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:01, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters
Talk:Ed Mirvish Theatre

message: This article is a word-for-word transcription of the description of the theatre in Mirvish's program (as of Jun/07) I am not a registered user how do I report a copyright violation?
:Does it sound to anyone else like the last three paragraphs of the "Rebirth" section were taken from a corporate press release? Mika182 (talk) 21:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Adriatic Charter

message: http://www.state.gov/p/eur/rls/fs/64297.htm
There are the specifics, it would be nice if a little more information were included.
By the way, what does this article have to do with the cold war? Contralya 11:49, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Removed WikiProject Cold War.--Patrick «» 17:09, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info 
Talk:Aktuelle Kamera

message: I completely miss the point of the ”Opening line” section. What is so extraordinarily specific in having the anchor greeting the viewers, mentioning the programme’s name and announcing the headline? 83.199.3.134 (talk) 15:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If the opening line is read exactly the same for forty years, it becomes something of a tradition. --Ericdn (talk) 18:24, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening line 

message: If West German TV only accounted for 10-15% of viewership in East Germany, how is it more popular than East German television?  Wouldn't that mean that 85-90% of television viewership was of East German television?  Seems to me the assertion is a little unsupported, and considering it is uncited to begin with I figure it should probably be changed.  Any thoughts? MattW93 (talk) 17:35, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popularity
Talk:Cosmode

message: I have seen 2015-2017 editions and now just saw 2018 Jan edition. This information that the 2014 issue was final has been wrong for years. I took a photo. Please see the link https://www.instagram.com/p/BchQi1TlHMJ/ Athiril (talk) 11:16, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cosmode is not discontinued 

message: Out of the four listed "official websites", three have been bought up and now contain other content that has nothing to do with the magazine. --2003:C4:DBDC:1ACD:2080:BAEA:A873:9413 (talk) 23:01, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link clean-up?
Talk:Vivre (Noa song)

message: Is there a reason that "For the One I Love" is enclosed in parentheses?  I'm staring at my US copy of All the Way right now, and the song's title is written simply as "Live for the One I Love".  Were the parentheses added for the single release, or for the album release in a different country/region, or are they not supposed to be there at all? - Charity 21:45, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The parentheses were added for the single release. Look at the cover. Max24 17:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If that's the case, then "For" should be capitalized. --Wolfer68 (talk) 06:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Parentheses
Talk:Allied Commission

message: Just to clarify a few points: 
# "Rumania" - all those comments are probably a remnant from some prior revert war and are no longer needed. "Romania" is modern usage and thus should be used throughout, but the contents of cited quotes cannot be modified.
# History of Romania during and after WWII can be found in the appropriate article or three.
# Blindly reverting spelling and style corrections is a Bad Thing. --Illythr (talk) 21:59, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romania 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Control Commission for Germany - British Element. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Hildeoc (talk) 17:53, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Control Commission for Germany - British Element listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Goodbye's (The Saddest Word)

message: is this the right word or typo?GinAndChronically (talk) 04:12, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  sp "accient" 
Talk:List of car crash songs

message: Why is this the page that users are sent to when they search for "Death disc" rather than Teenage tragedy song? This seems to be a subordinate concept to that broader article, but apparently others have already tried and failed to get rid of this article altogether. I just think that it makes more sense to redirect the phrase “death disc” to the more broadly defined article. giso6150 (talk) 18:58, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I'm going to go ahead and change it. If anyone feel strongly they can revert.Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:56, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death disc redirection 

message: Is this meant to be "songs about a car crash" or "songs in which a car crash happens"? Weird Al's inclusion would indicate the latter, because if that song's about a car crash then Poltergeist is about TV. Sensei Le Roof (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify 

message: Steven Wilson HOLY DRINKER . AggressiveAtheist (talk) 02:31, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add
Talk:Matchbox (window manager)

message: Matchbox is also used on the OpenMoko Neo1973, The IRex Illiad and the Vernier Labquest device
Why the heck does wikipedia randomly delete information ? this is silly!
KEEP THIS ARTICLE! even a single word is more than nothing...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.17.214.1 (talk) 15:37, August 29, 2007 (UTC) 
maybe they plan to make a print edition, idk  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.110.223 (talk) 17:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Altoona and Beech Creek Railroad

message: Can a map be found? - On looking at previous GA railroad articles they have maps of the railroad route.
Also check Wikipedia:Guide to layout for the ordering of the last sections of the article. Kind regards SriMesh | talk 01:02, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've included a section of a topographic map which shows the length of the railroad. The problem with a more conventional map is that I don't have one showing all the intermediate stations; I know where Juniata, Wopsononock, Highland Park, and Dougherty are, but that's it. Any suggestions? Choess (talk) 19:40, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've added a map, although the map may still require sprucing up. Choess (talk) 01:54, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Map?
Talk:Goodrich Quality Theaters

message: The new theater at Hamilton Crossing is in NOBLESVILLE, not Indianapolis. As the article points out how Goodrich theaters are usually in smaller cities, it seems only appropriate to place the theater in the actual city it resides in, rather than the nearest large city.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.51.100.102 (talk) 04:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamilton Crossing 

message: There have been a number of edits describing Goodrich's 3-strike termination policy. Most edits have portrayed the policy as harsh and unforgiving, indicating that they've probably been made by bitter ex-employees. I've reverted all these edits, due to the fact that a company's internal policies are not relevant to an encyclopedia entry (unless the policies are exceptional, which a 3-strike policy is not). If any disagrees, please make your case known... until then, I will continue to revert these changes.
Bet4a 23:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goodrich termination policies 

message: Added AL and PA theaters but failed to update the total number of screens because I do not know the number.  If you know these added or total numbers, please fix.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rsubasic (talk • contribs) 19:17, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Alabama and Pennsylvania Theaters
Talk:Tout l'or des hommes

message: It was 6 years since I've heard this song last time. I can't thank Wikipedia enough for helping me finding it. 194.187.59.90 (talk) 13:59, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Faith (Celine Dion song)

message: Canadian promotional CD single 
#"Faith" (Original 3 remix) – 3:38
#"Faith" (album version) – 3:43
--Bdx (talk) 12:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Formats and track listings
Talk:Cold War Recognition Certificate

message: The link provided at the end of the article does not provide information on the Cold War certificate, it goes to https://www.hrc.army.mil/site/index-flash.aspx which is the Army Human Resources Command homepage.  There is no information or search box available on that page to find the information.
I would edit the article myself but am not familiar enough with Wikipedia to do this.
J Kulacz, AT1 USN (ret)
24.117.91.92 (talk) 03:56, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad link for Certificate info 

message: Those who want to campaign for a Cold War service medal should set up their own site; we are not here to host one. In particular, This is the only certificate offered by the U.S. Department of Defense for service during a war begs the question; the Cold War was not a war - although it contained at least two. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 13:33, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Polemic
Talk:Counterterrorist Intelligence Center

message: Why is this article considered to be part of the Cold War history WikiProject?  According to Priest's article the first CTICs were established in the late 1990s.  Ketone16 (talk) 22:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - it shouldn't be, and I've replaced the template with a more appropriate one. Robofish (talk) 15:45, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cold War?
Talk:Schuylkill Branch

message: The statement "The line remains intact from Gibraltar, Pennsylvania at Gibraltar Road/PA Route 724 to Birdsboro, Pennsylvania. " is incorrect. The rail line that is in place there on the west bank of the Schuylkill is the ex-Reading line, it is a continuation of the former branch line from Reading to Wilmington, DE, which is now abandoned south of Birdsboro.  The PRR Schuylkill Branch is abandoned between Gibraltar and Birdsboro and part of it has been made part of the Schuykill River trail.
Also in addition to the intact segments listed, there is a piece of track still in place in Pottstown, PA.Chipkraft (talk) 17:37, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

message: No sources cited for what is written.  Can't find any verification of intent to reactivate the Schuylkill Branch past Ivy Ridge for a Philadelphia-Reading commuter service.  Can someone provide sources, or can we put that down to rail buff rumor/pipedream fantasy?
71.241.70.24 (talk) 02:24, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What is written is that SVM "would have used the ex-PRR/Penn Central tracks from 52nd Street to Ivy Ridge," not what you said above.  seems to be the best website to source SVM-related material at present. Choess (talk) 02:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That source is dead. What we need is a station list. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  11:55, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Schuylkill Valley Metro "facts"?

message: Strictly speaking, the Schuylkill Secondary and Schuylkill Branch are separated but related lines. A PRR document from 1964 defines the former as Norristown–Hazleton and the latter as Norristown–Wynnefield (Valley, junction with Main Line). This division is reflected in the 1976 Conrail conveyance, although the division point has shifted east from Norristown to Manayunk. Near as I can tell, Conrail sells the Schuylkill Branch to SEPTA in 1979 under the 900-day option, retaining trackage rights and the Schuylkill Secondary, eventually redesignated the Phoenixville Branch/Secondary. Most of that is abandoned by 1982. Mackensen (talk) 16:29, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a relatively late distinction; I don't think the PRR started designating some of its branches as "secondary tracks" until the 1950s or 1960s (the term is not in the 1951 rule book) and the 1945 C.T. 1000 designates the entire line from Valley to Hazleton as the "Schuylkill Branch". Given that the junction point between the two shifted over time (presumably to reflect the end of passenger service?) I think it makes sense for this article to take on the broader scope of the term. Choess (talk) 19:53, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fair. My concern is simply that as written the article sort of implies that the line is fully abandoned, which isn't accurate. I'll tweak the language. Mackensen (talk) 00:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line names
Talk:Crazy Ivan

message: I'm familiar with the song in question and I can see how one could make that mistake, but can one really substantiate an assertion that this is "often" misheard?
--Phoenix9 20:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrical Misinterpretation 

message: In the movie the Hunt for the Red October, the term Crazy Ivan was used to describe Russian submarine captains who would clear their baffles to make sure they weren't being followed. The term was never used in the film to describe rogue Russians at large. Why is this article unclear on that consistency between both the movie and book? It is a plot point in both. 65.112.8.3 (talk) 03:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no mention of the movie in the article. The article says the novel uses the first version. It doesn't say the novel uses the second version. What is unclear? -- Pemilligan (talk) 20:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie Red October usage 

message: I was talking recently to a former US navy person, who used this term in the context of Soviet submarines trying to scare enemy submarines from following by doing a chicken-run like ramming maneuver... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:36, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Baffles?
Talk:Wawa and Concordville Railroad

message: It's hard to be sure, given the lack of footnotes or bibliography, but much of this article seems to be taken from some other source that is quite out of date.  Other portions appear to be either plagiarized or original research, neither of which is consistent with Wikipedia's standards.  The Facebook page linked from this page is, by and large, copied from this page. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 16:01, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: . Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Mackensen (talk) 22:07, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency

message: Ignore everything I wrote previously. I got the 1961 & 1962 dates mixed up because I'm also editing his bio article. No more multi-tasking for me! Anyway, I'll be bold to cite Cabell's retirement here. (sheepish grimace) Rob Rosenberger (talk) 03:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cabell's retirement 

message: Voices in head family members voices 107.134.128.140 (talk) 20:59, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voices in head
Talk:Immensité

message: I don't think "lesbian" writer should be included. I'm going to remove it. Iggy Ax (talk) 12:53, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
Template talk:Periodontology

message: About pathogenesis: Bacteroides forsythus should be renamed Tannerella forsythensis as per  Quite a few places (templates, pages) that should be changed Grasshoppa (talk) 08:10, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

message: The below message was copied from my talk page. --Arcadian (talk) 06:46, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As noted in the edit history, part of content in this template was moved to Template:Mouth anatomy and Template:Oral pathology. This was done for consistency with standards across systems, and to better group together related articles. --Arcadian (talk) 06:46, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Periodontology template
Talk:Essentials of Post–Cold War Deterrence

message: "some elements may appear to be potentially 'out of control' can be beneficial to creating and reinforcing fears and doubts in the minds of an adversary's decision makers" - sounds like a prophecy/call for the coming president Trump. 94.21.63.118 (talk) 08:42, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  chicken game revisited
Talk:Euro-Atlantic Partnership Council

message: Seems map is outdated. Both Serbia and Bosnia-Herzegovina are now member states.--83.183.53.80 (talk) 19:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: Is it a sort of "pledge status" for nations such as Georgia? 76.237.239.102 (talk) 03:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Prelim Status

message: The article Partnership for Peace mentions "". This failure is not evident or explained in this article. What happened to the NACC? What is the Partnership for Peace article talking about? I'd prefer answers to these questions in the form of edits to the article rather than discussion on this talk page. Daask (talk) 23:05, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NACC failure
Talk:Nils Ferlin

message: Who translated "döddansare" to "zombie"? Weird indeed. "Döddansare" means, according the the dictionary or Nationalencyklopedin, very boring person, esp. about someone ruled by hard religions or moral principles. This definition jibes will with how it is used in the poem "På källaren Fimmelstången", about Lasse Lucidor. Anyone who sees this post and the article unchanged a week from now should change it.
Generally, I disencourage home made translations of titles. It usually ends up with weird things, like this one. // 213.89.235.236 23:59, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See the edit button on top of the page? It actually lets you edit pages... (yes, I've removed the translation now) EditorInTheRye 00:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Flexible response

message: There definitely ought to be some citations in this article.  It shouldn't be hard to do - if I had time I'd use John Lewis Gaddis' Strategies of Containment to fill in the citations gap.
140.180.27.33 (talk) 04:17, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: This article refers to Flexible Response as the Kennedy Doctrine, but Flexible Response is not clearly mentioned in the Kennedy Doctrine article. Meanwhile, the Spanish Wikipedia refers to Flexible Response as the McNamara Doctrine . Please also consider updating List of eponymous doctrines RichardVeryard (talk) 19:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whose doctrine is this?
Talk:Foreign Broadcast Information Service

message: This article is the FB information service, I'm proposing that the FB intelligence service article be merged into this article on the information service.  The intelligence service lasted a year before it was replaced by the information service.  Right now it is a stub article.  I propose they be merged.TeeTylerToe (talk) 22:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 17:35, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with Foreign Broadcast Information Service 
Talk:Green Gang

message: Removed unsourced material inserted here and in Du Yusheng by someone who seems to think that gongfu was the main item of discussion. DOR (HK) (talk) 07:15, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And, a second time. Might have to learn how to request intervention if this continues. DOR (HK) (talk) 08:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This organization claims to be the direct continuation of the Green Gang: [www.allfamily168.org] (Chinese).  Yel D'ohan (talk) 04:49, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The website states the group was established in 2011. Where does the claim that they are "a direct continuation of the Green Gang" appear on the website? Rgr09 (talk) 07:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  You're right that they are not explicitly saying that, but that's the case they are making. When they talk about their history they basically describe the Green Gang. They call themselves 清. They sell self-published books about the history of the Green Gang. As for that 2011, it's only the year when they formally registered as a legal entity.  Yel D'ohan (talk) 21:59, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still active as an NGO in Taiwan?