Talk:Nginx

message: I didn't find any mentioning of nginx in that YouTube-architecture video
Indeyets (talk) 15:46, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Poato 2409:40C1:1008:296B:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 15:21, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: YouTube video

message: Re: "As with lighttpd, nginx is a fork of Apache 1.3 with the prefork MPM removed and an event-loop in its place."
This is obvious from even a cursory look at the code. Many major architectural aspects of nginx are obviously derived from Apache httpd, including the use of pools, the module structure, and other code directly lifted from the 1.3 source. The fact that it does not abide by the Apache License in such usages is another matter entirely.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimjag (talk • contribs) 13:56, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The copyright is 2000-2009 Igor Sysoev. I would suggest you find a citation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpash (talk • contribs) 13:53, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Fork

message: What is it with the "I currently have?" This isn't someones autobiography. I clicked on the link provided and it references lighthttpd. Something cited also from 3 years ago probably isn't accurate for today.Woods01 (talk) 04:31, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. --213.17.13.124 (talk) 22:05, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: First person

message: I see this page mentions that Nginx is now fourth in total domains hosted but I think this is incorrect. If you look at the Netcraft survey you see that qq.com is third but if you check qq.com you will see that they are serving with Nginx. So in fact their total should likely be added into Nginx. I don't know if there is some other hidden factor but this appears true from checking the Response Headers for their home page (which is Chinese).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.9.189.8 (talk) 16:40, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ranking

message: This page looks to me more like an advert than an encyclopaedia entry. I think some of this content needs deleting. Ordishj (talk) 14:44, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree. A list of companies that use it doesn't tell me anything about it. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:48, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

text: Yeah this page tells me a veritable cornucopia of... nothing. It should be expanded since I see this piece of software all over but with actual useful information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.28.140.7 (talk) 22:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

text: The article makes no claims to superiority to other webservers. It's just the facts. Would the random anonymous commenters like to cite reasons this article reads like an advertisement? MarshallKe (talk) 16:52, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement

message: According to the official nginx web site, nginx.org, the current stable version is not 1.1.0 but 1.0.5. 1.1.0 is only the current development version. Yeysus (talk) 13:12, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version 

message: According to wiki.nginx.org/faq the pronunciation is "engine-ex"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by XBytez (talk • contribs) 13:24, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: I think nginx is no longer part of openBSD base. http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20140827065755
Impossible to know why. 
14:11, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you want the article to explain why, with references, or do you want to know for yourself? Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:20, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update on openBSD 

message: The documentation at  indicates that the location_country parameter is for the "current country of the company's headquarters". That's not an office in San Francisco, or any other satellite office, or secondary locations, or regional head offices, but the head office. There is usually only one head office. With that said, we should be adding a location_city parameter as well. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox company: location_country 

message: A word about that would be nice. There are rulesets wich appear to work out of the box, but does it apply to all of them ?--Psycho Chicken (talk) 07:35, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: typo corrected. Psycho Chicken (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  htaccess compatibility 

message: Nginx-rtmp-module has been tagged with Template:Merge to for nearly three years now. One could also question the notability of nginx-rtmp-module (WP:NOTE). Besides the nginx-rtmp-modules article, it also has no references besides external links to primary source (WP:NOCITE). Two sensible choices here seem to be to either delete the nginx-rtmp-module article, or merge into nginx. 80.221.159.67 (talk) 13:18, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have nominated it for deletion. Feel free to mention it here. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:09, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal: Nginx-rtmp-module 

message: I can't possibly judge whether this is a problem with nginx or with its users, but wouldn't this page benefit from some mention of how often sites using this software are broken?
502 Bad Gateway
nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)
If it is badly configured sites, it's curious as the error is common enough on serious sites. This latest experience of mine is on clicking from choice.com.au to their forum site choice.community, (and entering the address directly gets the same result, so it is apparently the forum site that has the problem).
--Alkhowarizmi (talk) 11:14, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken? 

message: Please help expand this stub section. NGINX Unit is new and in need of elucidation. Kizerkizer (talk) 02:30, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  nginx Unit