lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Four Pillars of Transnistria

message: "State sovereignty of PMR under international law" (pdf)
: I disagree with this link: if it were by a Transnistrian official source, I wouldn't mind, but since we know what ICDISS is... bogdan 13:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, but remember: The criticism of ICDISS was always about its externals. There was never any substantial or documented criticism about the actual contents of the report(s). - Mauco 14:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  But it would be interesting to find out if anyone in Transnistria picked it up and republished it as an official source (as Edward Lucas thinks, it could have been an "official production" all along). - Mauco 14:02, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Seems to me that this may be a POV fork of Transnistria. Perhaps it should be merged into that article. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 00:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:42, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Operation Ezra and Nehemiah

message: "This astounding Zionist accomplishment, known as Operation Ezra and Nehemiah (aka Operation Ali Baba), gave a final glorious curtain call to the ancient Babylonian exile~" Hello ? NPOV anyone ? Nobel prize 4 peace 13:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In this, I agree with you. -- Avi 19:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article currently tells only the propaganda side of the story. Much of the balancing info (often from the same underlying sources already in this article, just selectively used) is already at Jewish_exodus_from_Arab_and_Muslim_countries#Iraq. Oncenawhile (talk) 23:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 
Talk:Bell 207 Sioux Scout

message: Some decent information about history of the development available here (first flight, etc.):  --Born2flie 08:43, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:40, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: Present are unapplicable. Aren't they ? --EH101 (talk) 09:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  It's a Bell 47/H-13, not a Bell 207. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:40, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

text: machin-gun sentences sorted, just needs specifications for the Model 207 (not those of a Bell-H-13) to be re-instated.Petebutt (talk) 00:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three view drawings 

message: If someone fiinds the specification s for the 207 please add missing using Template:Aircraft specsPetebutt (talk) 00:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifiations 

message: User:BilCat you reverted my deletion:  of the links to Bell D-255 which takes readers to the Bell AH-1 Cobra page saying "Reverted deletion of useful links - it links to a section where the D-255 is covered". Firstly it doesn't link to the Background section of the AH-1 page and then even when you read the Background section it just mirrors the wording of the Design and Development section of this page, so what is the point in linking it? Mztourist (talk) 02:59, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Bell D-255
Talk:Victor Farías

message: This person's name is Víctor Farías, not Victor Farias. (with í’s not i’s)203.194.54.36 14:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:George Boyd (footballer)

message: I don't know anything about football, but how come the article says that he is both currently playing for a club, and that he will join them in a week or so? J Milburn 14:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, thanks, I thought that would be it, but I didn't want to touch it. J Milburn 14:31, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: This section seems to be too long compared to some articles of top players such as Carlos Tevez and Virgil van Dijk who are more famous worldwide than George Boyd. Some of this content in the section was added after this became a good article 10 years ago. This article needs a review to see what should stay and what should be removed or located elsewhere as I would not think this would pass as a good article in this day and age. Thanks, Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:28, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: you've made a very valid point with this. I would say that we should remove the final paragraph altogether. It's a bit meaningless and with his professional career seemingly over soon, at aged 35, I don't think we need to include info about parts of his game that Boyd thinks he needs to improve on. I'd also remove everything from the penultimate paragraph after the sentence "This resulted in Boyd being described as the Premier League's "most industrious" player, as well as being praised for his high fitness levels." Rupert1904 (talk) 02:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've removed what I suggested to do so. Please remove more as well. Rupert1904 (talk) 02:29, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, decent points made above. Although I don't know where I sit with the idea that "top players" should have more detail than, say, a Football League player just because they are "more famous". But as you both say, in this instance it was far too long and also very outdated. I have given the whole article a trim and then a revamp too. The infamous style of play section too. SBFCEdit (talk) 22:44, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style of Play section
Talk:WightFibre

message: Despite the granduous ideas of the new management of Wightfibre the business has just been sold off!!A1consultancy (talk) 16:53, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

message: Just out of interest how can one company be two companies at the same time? i only ask because it looks as though Smallworld is connected to wightcable but there isnt any mention of Smallworld apart from in the links section, should this not be mentioned in the main body of text in a lot more detail than it is now. --AJFurnell 15:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Companies ?

message: (Removed Negative Original Research) At the end of the day its always about the money.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.63.27.41 (talk) 21:08, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You cannot use WP to complain about a company. It the same all over the UK - you only get the service you pay for. If you want fast speeds, it will cost you. I get as fast as I want, but I pay £23 pm for it.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:12, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

text: It's still not allowed - it's original reasearch, only proper verifiable data from reliable sources is permitted on Wikipedia - especially so if there is any negative aspects to the content.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:00, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2003-2011 speed/latency 

message: I not sure what wikipedia stands for here but as a 10 year.I will happy inform the public that 2mb speeds in peak hours isnt fast and isnt the fastest provider in cowes and newport. Its all misleading infomation.
Business lines and residential are the same thing with wightcable.
And btw, This is the isle of wight we only have 4 providers. Two of them being bt (02), others wightcable and talk talk. So no you dont get what you pay for over here. Bt dont care much so that leavs talk talk.
You can delete my comment but than you might as well quite your day job unless you wont to conform to the corporate lies and deceit (backwards evolution).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.63.28.143 (talk) 12:54, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  truth or deception? 

message: I've just had a look at the homepage link and it would seem that they have changed their name to WightFibre. If anyone can confirm this please update and move the article. Alphathon  (talk) 21:24, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WightFibre?
Talk:Biak Archipelago

message: Since the comments above this article is now clearly about the Indonesian Schouten Islands. Does anyone have any views/information on whether Schouten Islands or Biak Islands is most commonly used for this group in English? Certainly the official name appears to be Kepulauan Biak. Just a thought... Istanbuljohnm (talk) 06:29, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  shouldn't this article be renamed Biak Islands? 
Talk:List of Fate/stay night episodes

message: I've nominated this article for WP:FL status. Please improve it in any fashion possible. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 04:10, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FLC
Talk:Vyshhorod

message: Vyshhorod or Vyshgorod?? Smallbones (talk) 22:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Vyshhorod (Вишгород) is in Ukrainian, and Vyshgorod (Вышгород) is Russian. The spelling difference (in English) is because of the different usage of the Cyrillic leter г between Ukrainian and Russian. Ukrainian has letters г (which will transliterate as h) and and ґ (which transliterates as g), while Russian only has the letter г (g).. —dima/talk/ 00:10, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of name 

message: Not my field, so I merely tagged the article. Maybe somebody will edit it sometime - or at least add a ref, so that we know, where it is copied from. Ajnem (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags
Talk:Royal Netherlands East Indies Army

message: very basic article. still too much to do. i might return to it at a later stage. --KARL RAN (talk) 18:35, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article Jan Verveer is highly relevant as to how the Dutch raised soldiers for the unit in the early days of its existence. However the agreement between the Dutch and the King of the Ashanti caused considerable disquiet in British diplomatic circles as it was regarded as undermining attempts to suppress the Slave Trade. In a letter from Sir E.C. Disbrowe, the British Ambassador to the Netherlands, to Lord Palmerston, dated 18 September 1840, he states:
Your Lordship is probably aware that a Treaty exists, by which the King of Ashantee furnishes a thousand recruits annually for the Netherlands regiments in Java, these recruits only receiving manumission at Elmina.
Correspondence with the British Commissioners, at Sierra Leone, the Havana, Rio de Janeiro, and Surinam: From May 11th, to December 31st, 1840, inclusive p.242
There are further mentions about Verveer and the agreement in the aforementioned volume.
Bohun (talk) 13:30, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jan Verveer and recruitment from the Ashanti 

message: a. All the references given in this footnote are missing (Manuhutu (1987); Steylen (1996: 33–63); van Amersfoort (1982: 101–8); Wittermans (1991).
Perhaps the person who inserted them could complete the task?
Thanks a lot!
Gerry1998 (talk) 05:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 
Talk:List of stars in Cancer

message: Etymologies listed here don't fit into the table, so please add them in respective star articles with sources.--JyriL talk 14:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymologies
Talk:New Holland (Australia)

message: Compare
::The American author Edgar Allan Poe used ...
with
::In 1854, Henry David Thoreau - an American author, poet, abolitionist, naturalist, tax resister, development critic, surveyor, historian, philosopher and leading transcendentalist - mentioned ...
While a Thoreau fan might think every mention of him should be accompanied by 'glow', I think this is massively overblown here. Shenme (talk) 02:18, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and have fixed the problem.  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 02:47, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blovium 
Talk:Martin Briley

message: Good amount of content here but needs formatting (sections etc) and maybe a picture would be good. Might have a go later KZF 14:46, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have formatted the article now and arranged it into sections but i have only worked with the info that was already here (which incidentally was copied from his website) - so if anyone could flesh out this article a bit, add some extra info about him, that would be great! KZF 21:42, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement ideas
Talk:The Minus 5

message: It's really ugly, whether it appears in the infobox, in the article proper, or the template at the bottom of the page. If it's necissary to catalog every person that has ever played with this group I'm recommending it all get moved to a list of it's own. List of Minus 5 members maybe.  Zytsef (talk) 01:14, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed it. On taking a second look at the context in which the monster list was used I'm thinking the new list page might need to be moved. We'll see how I feel about it later. In the mean time, please move or edit the new list as you see fit. I'm sure someone who actually knows anything about this group could do some good. Zytsef (talk) 00:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List of members
Talk:Yokujō Climax

message: I'm wondering which is most clear to readers when talking about Shoei Jinnai/The Prince: his real name or his nickname? In the manga he's almost always referred to as The Prince. But maybe this is unclear for wikipedia readers? Any thoughts? Ninja neko 19:39, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shoei versus Prince 

message: Here the French coverage i found: 
         
Find someone else to translate and make summary of it because i won't do it :p --KrebMarkt 19:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Right ho. BTW, for whoever comes along for translation purposes, I did a search for German reviews, but found none -- I suspect because volume 1 had just been published. I'll try to remember to make another search in a month or two. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  French coverage 

message: Given the Japanese cover includes the English text "Desire Climax" (as well as "欲情(C)MAX" and furigana for the reading "Yokujou Climax") I think it's safe to say that's the official English name of the series, and that this should be moved back to Desire Climax. Any objections? —Quasirandom (talk) 20:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also of note, Manga News calls out Desire Climax as the US title of the series. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:Auxiliary ship

message: These ships did not carry out research unless you count one officer on each ship who was there to provide cover, they were intelligence collection platforms administered by the Naval Security Group on behalf of the National Security Agency and it probably should be stated here instead of the often repeated cover story.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.151.63 (talk) 23:05, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: The AGTR and AGER

message: Dear wikipedians: this seems to be an important naval term, but is totally unsourced. I noticed that there is a "Category:Auxiliary ships" and another very similar "Category:Service vessels". I tried to find online a definition to ascertain which one is correct, the other can be merged into it, but the only "encyclopedic definition" I found was this one in Wikipedia. Can anyone please help resolving this by providing a verifiable source for this definition? Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 02:06, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source needed - this seems to be a key naval term 

message: The grammar/wording in this article;
* , random capitalisation  
The lack of citations;
* The entire "Support" section. The first paragraph of harbor.
Worldwide view
* eg.  - Those are entirely American designations. 
None of these issues have been fixed so the tags remain. A general excise of the American designations would also be worthwhile and a link to Hull classification symbol would be more appropriate to cut down on the laser focus of this article on US naval designations.Llammakey (talk) 15:32, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple issues
Talk:Scott Moore (rugby league)

message: Can someone disambiguate from the american sports player
:Done. Julius Sahara 19:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: WP:UNITS requires that for UK related articles "the primary units for personal height and weight are feet​/inches and stones/​pounds". I propose to change this article to observe that requirement unless a good reason not follow the guideline can be given.
That a certain source uses certain units is not a valid reason as the guideline recommends using the "flip" option in such circumstances: "Where the article's primary units differ from the units given in the source, the  template's |order=flip flag can be used; this causes the original unit to be shown as secondary in the article, and the converted unit to be shown as primary". Speccy4Eyes (talk) 19:44, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As the majority of rugby profiles are metric first, and as rugby teams give their information in metric units it would be more sensible to leave the order of units as they are. Of course, if you felt that this was not satisfactory you could take up this issue with MOSNUM. Michael Glass (talk) 12:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary units 

message: Scott Morre's profiles can be found on the Tigers website but Superleague put him with the Wildcats.  I don't know where he belongs. Perhaps someone else knows. Michael Glass (talk) 02:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claimed by two teams?
Talk:Walloon Region (federal region)

message: So I see that after not accepting the agreement we have reach on WikiFR, Stéphane Dohet is now exporting his little war on WikiEN.  This is becoming really pathetic!  I start thinking that you missed your goal when you have put José Fontaine under discussion.  I am convinced that most of the trouble came in fact from Mr. Dohet. I hope his friends will manage to convince him that he better stops this and fairly applies the existing agreement. --Lebob-BE 15:14, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference Wallonia and Walloon Region 

message: Why does the Walloon Region not constitute a nation? The mythologies, flag, language, the way people there identify themselves -- these are clear characteristics of a nation. 75.181.132.234 22:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I beg to differ 

message: I have made a few changes, as an outsider and a native English-speaker, that I hope are clarifications. But I have not addressed the apparent conflict between saying that the "national" day is 27 September and the decree of 23 July 2008, which states: "Article 1er. La fête de la Région wallonne est célébrée chaque année le troisième dimanche du mois de septembre. (The Walloon Regional Holiday shall take place each year on the third Sunday in September)."  Obviously, the third Sunday will not always be the 27th, the French Community Holiday. How is this resolved in practice? Wikiain (talk) 01:34, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "National" day 

message: Both articles are on same subject. There is no difference between the Walloon Region and Wallonia like there is not difference between Belgium and the Kingdom of Belgium. Both articles should be merged together.--Wester (talk) 14:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. While the article "Wallonia" may describe the region both as an institutional Region and as a cultural area, the current article "Walloon Region (federal region)" does not add any value, it just provides information that is mostly already present on "Wallonia". It is a much shorter article and it is linked from only few other pages; most pages link to Wallonia directly even when the federal region is meant. In short, I see no value in keeping this (duplicate) article. Thanks for bringing this up, I have wanted to make this a redirect before but then I would've needed to start a discussion first :) SPQRobin (talk) 17:34, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion should be at Talk:Wallonia. I've moved your comment SPQRobin. Oreo Priest talk 15:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walloon Region (federal region) and Wallonia (again)
Talk:Legalize Crime

message: This still needs a lot of work, perhaps someone more knowledgeable than me can help, or just someone with more motivation! Foolish Child 15:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zothique

message: They were also featured in Conan the Adventurer and Conan the Savage, which both adapted many Clark Ashton Smith stories. 
00:36, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Zothique and Poseidonis

message: The setting of the videogame Necropolis by Harebrained Studios is heavily influenced by Smith's works. The continent in which the game takes place is named Zothique, and - although not as part of the gameplay - many other locations are named after Zothique's places, such as Zul Bhasir.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyracul (talk • contribs) 07:59, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zothique in videogames
Talk:Bob Mellors

message: Bob is mentioned in a few places and on the basis of many references to his work in "No Bath but Plenty of Bubbles" certainly should have a small bio on wiki. I have created a mini, mini bio and will try to get time to come back to expand it.-- Ashley VH 15:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation 

message: I've removed the stub tags as the bio is in much better shape. Luckily I tracked down the Gay Times article from May 1996 as a useful alternative source.-- Ashley VH 10:30, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Starwood/Proposed decision

message: I edited this article so I'm not going to undo my inactive state.  FloNight 15:50, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FloNight recuse

message: I ask that the Arbitrators please see the details I've added to my statement today, under Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Starwood#Semi-Statement by Kathryn NicDhàna at the bottom: "Update, 3-19-07".  I've also dropped a note about this on Fred's talk page.  Thank you. - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 23:39, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please also look at my comment concerning these "added details", which I have placed right after them. Rosencomet 19:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosencomet's recent activity - Concerns 

message: As long as Kathryn has mentioned the most recent info on Rosencomet's actions around the Starwood article, I might as well remind folks of my last update on 2/28/07 to my evidence statement: Beyond the Valley of the Concluding remarks and as a diff . Also of note is Rosencomet's comment/response within my evidence statement.  This is somewhat old news and, considering this arbitration is all but closed, perhaps not entirely relevent but I wanted to make sure it wasn't overlooked. The reason I added the info to my evidence rather than the workshop area is because the workshop had become very difficult to navigate. Thanks. --Pigmandialogue 06:16, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My last update 

message: ** Please also read my response to these "details", which I have placed below them. Rosencomet 20:33, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment moved