lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Philip the Bold

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
Philip II, Duke of Burgundy → Philip the Bold – The current title is rarely, if ever used; the replacement, however, is the most common name used. Michael  Sanders 22:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *But nonetheless, "Philip the Bold" is his most common English name. Philip III of France is far less frequently known as such. Michael  Sanders 13:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The primary meaning of "Philip the Bold" is the subject of this article, so there is no reason for this article not to occupy that location. I have therefore disregarded Srnec's opposition, with the proviso that a dablink be placed on this article linking to Philip III of France. Bad translating practice is also no argument for or against a title, while common usage is. This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 17:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" or other opinion in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support as nominator Michael  Sanders 22:00, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *But nonetheless, "Philip the Bold" is his most common English name. Philip III of France is far less frequently known as such. Michael  Sanders 13:52, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
The primary meaning of "Philip the Bold" is the subject of this article, so there is no reason for this article not to occupy that location. I have therefore disregarded Srnec's opposition, with the proviso that a dablink be placed on this article linking to Philip III of France. Bad translating practice is also no argument for or against a title, while common usage is. This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 17:47, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey 

message: "It was restored in the first half of the 19th century, and is today at the Musée des Écoles d'art de Dijon in the Palace of the Dukes of Burgundy."
This is an error. No such museum exists (as a quick google will show). It should be Musée des Beaux-Arts de Dijon.
David
82.224.103.123 (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected - it was right at Champmol in any case. Johnbod (talk) 00:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musée des Écoles d'art de Dijon
Talk:Piero di Cosimo de' Medici

message: The portrait by Bronzino attached to this entry is a portrait of the grandson of Piero the Gouty, not of the Piero who is th subject of this entry. 141.161.133.222 (talk) 18:08, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The National Gallery in London, where the painting is, seems to disagree - see this. DeCausa (talk) 19:18, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  portrait by Bronzino
Talk:WTOU

message: WQLR (AM) → WQLR — WQLR is the official callsign of the station, and the disambig currently consists only of the current WQLR and the former WQLR -- this can be accomplised by the use of the For template at the top of the main article. JPG-GR 03:17, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. --Stemonitis 13:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Arthur Conley

message: All is fake  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.39.122.122 (talk) 15:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What are the odds that Arthur Conley was born after November 27 1952?? I have a feeling he was.PLease someone look his birth records up for me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jason69535554 (talk • contribs) 02:53, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have some reason to doubt reliable sources such as Find-a-Grave?  The other five language wikipedias also give January 4,1946.  —EncMstr (talk) 03:32, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 
Talk:Arthur Dake

message: What's the source for him being listed under :Category:Jewish chess players?  I've seen anecdotal evidence that he was Christian in religious practice, although that doesn't rule out the possibility of Jewish ethnicity. -- Bill-on-the-Hill (talk) 17:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewish?

message: *https://oregonencyclopedia.org/articles/dake_arthur_1910_2000_/#.WT9GSxiZNo4 ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:56, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 
Talk:Arthur Davis (animator)

message: We find this opening the final paragraph:
:Thirteen years later [after his own unit was shut down], Davis directed a cartoon for Warners again when Freleng was busy with other projects. This cartoon was Quackodile Tears....
It is impossible to interpret this sentence as describing anything but a single, isolated incident, which is far from the truth. In fact not only Freleng's unit but Chuck Jones' as well put out a handful of cartoons without the head man's name on them. Gerry Chiniquy directed Dumb Patrol, Abe Levitow helmed a Pepé Le Pew short, and two of Chuck's animators shared the directorial credit in the last cartoon in the brief "Wolf and Sheepdog" series, to name three I know of off the top of my head; there are definitely others. Yet, no animation source that I know of acknowledges this situation, let alone explains just why it happened (whatever it was, Robert McKimson was apparently immune, as there are no such releases from his unit). In fact, Leonard Maltin's Of Mice and Magic credits most if not all of these shorts to Friz or Chuck themselves, per whichever unit produced them. Even if we can't get any documentation as to just what the situation was, this statement—unsourced, BTW—needs to come out as it is misleading. So I am doing that. --Tbrittreid (talk) 20:25, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Director of ''Quackodile Tears''
Talk:Grace Christian School (Alaska)

message: unacceptable article, but does not seem to fit speedy--schools can not be speedied as non-notable. DGG (talk) 04:22, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can it be speedied as a vanity magnet? David D. (Talk) 05:02, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

message: There are legitimate changes being made to this page, via request of the Stanly Moderation and Completion Association, stop changing this page.  The next person to delete this declares their IQ at 17, and also declare the fact they have never had, or will have female relations.  All of your work will also be deleted... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.17.189.153 (talk • contribs) 
:Why don't you address the real issues of why your work is being deleted?  Your current additions are non encyclopedic.  In fact, they would be better suited on a blog if you wish to edit with such a chatty style. Verfiability is also important, while you may have the truth that is useless if not verifiable. Read WP:FIRST and WP:Verifiable to get yourself on the right track. Making edits in retribution to my deletions here will cause you to fall foul of WP:POINT and certainly get you blocked for disrupting wikipedia.  However, more mature discussion and attempts by you to make this article more encylcopedic will be welcomed and help your work remain in wikipedia. David D. (Talk) 18:54, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just itemized the various sentences in the study hall section explaining why they are inappropriate. I'll go through the other sections too if you like, or you can make them more encyclopedic yourself. David D. (Talk) 19:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just when through the PhaseIII section and removed all the non encyclopedic material. Someone else feel free to go through the Bible section that needs significant editing too.  David D. (Talk) 22:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Constant Changing

message: ....be a good article if you used sourced material. Why all the trash talking instead?  You know full well it will be reverted immediately.  Why are you wasting your time? David D. (Talk) 03:26, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This could....
Talk:Qara Yusuf

message: Added a book reference and information to the article. Atabek 19:49, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The 23:07, 19 October 2007 Chapultepec version of this article is translated in to Chinese Wikipedia.--Philopp 13:36, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation into Chinese Wikipedia
Talk:Raimondo Orsini del Balzo

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 00:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Raimondo Orsini del Balzo, Prince of Taranto →  – His name is quite sufficient to identify him. We do not have Joe Biden, President of the United States after all. Unambiguous personal names do not need an appositive disambiguation. Surtsicna (talk) 00:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 December 2023
Talk:Stanisław Konarski

message: The Latin phrase sapere auso is similar to the one used by Horace in his Epistulae 1,2: Sapere aude- Dare to know, or more properly: Dare to be wise, sapere being an infinitiveof sapio, and aude second person singular imperative of audeo. Horace is a source for this without any doubt. But the version sapere auso means rather for the one who dared to think [or one must dare try in order to be wise], as auso is a singular dative from ausus, the one who dared to know. 
I believe a better English translation is very possible, but the current article version is very misleading. Kameal (talk) 11:15, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sapere auso is translated incorrectly 

message: The article has no info about the fundamental Konarskis's work, O skutecznym rad sposobie or  On the efficient way of organizing the Sejm assemblies [the literal translation: On the efficient way of [making] the councils. It is a progressive tract on basic issues in the Polish internal affairs (mainly the liberum veto) as well as a masterpiece of rhetorical style. 
Theo other works of Konarski are also worthy of an mention. Kameal (talk) 11:14, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fundamental work is missing
Talk:Richard Scrope (bishop)

message: Created subpage at Talk:Richard le Scrope/Temp which is free of copyright violations. Ealdgyth - Talk 19:47, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much for your speed in addressing this! It's a bit unusual, but seems a very valid use of WP:IAR to go ahead and put this publishable article in place. In case permission for the other can be verified or other contributors want to salvage references or facts from it, I have moved it to Talk:Richard le Scrope/deleted revisions but not yet deleted it. It's listed at today's WP:CP. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:51, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: Maydestone is clear that Richard was doctor utriusque juris Cantabrigiae, which is to say a doctor both of canon and of civil law.  Was he wrong?
Mjhrynick (talk) 21:26, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  utriusque juris 

message: Hi Ealdgyth,
There was an edit conflict just now, and I may have inadvertently deleted your recent changes as I had added considerable new material to the article and cited a number of sources, and didn't know what you have changed, so I simply pasted my new material in again and saved it. Please go ahead and add back in whatever it was you'd changed during the edit conflict. NinaGreen (talk) 16:58, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re citations with links 

message: Hi SchreiberBike,
I notice you linked Scrope's appointment as warden of a free chapel to the Wikipedia article on the position of churchwarden. I'm wondering whether they're actually the same thing. I don't know the answer to that question, but I have the impression that the former is a clerical benefice, while the latter seems to be an elected position among the lay members of the congregation. NinaGreen (talk) 14:50, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right, he was a Rector (ecclesiastical) before he was a "warden" which makes it nearly impossible for him to have been a lay person and hence a churchwarden. Thanks for noting the problem. I've unlinked "warden" in the article. If you are able to write an article about a "warden of a free chapel," Wikipedia would be better for it. Thanks, SchreiberBike (talk) 21:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll see what I can find. It could be a useful addition. NinaGreen (talk) 01:27, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warden of free chapel vs churchwarden 

message: Hi User 89.81.153.56,
I see you've changed Stephen Scrope, 2nd Baron Scrope of Masham to Stephen Scrope, 3rd Baron Scrope of Masham. I'm wondering whether you've had a look at the Wikipedia article on Baron Scrope of Masham at , which states that Stephen Scrope was the 2nd Baron? In that article the first three barons are listed as:
:Henry Scrope, 1st Baron Scrope of Masham (1312–1391)
:Stephen Scrope, 2nd Baron Scrope of Masham (c. 1345–1406)  
:Henry Scrope, 3rd Baron Scrope of Masham (c. 1373–1415) (forfeit 1415)
Your comments would be appreciated. NinaGreen (talk) 17:51, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stephen Scrope, 2nd Baron or 3rd Baron?
Talk:Richard of Cirencester

message: I'm not going to say the current list is inaccurate. Works may have been lost or attributions changed by modern scholarship, but Giles (1847) lists
* Historia ab Hengisto ad Ann. 1348 in 2 parts, the first preserved in the public library at the University of Cambridge (Ff. i. 28.) and the second probably in a MS. in the library of the Royal Society Britonum Anglorum et Saxonum Historia (p. 137)
* Epitome Chronic. Ric. Cor. West. Lib. I at the library of Corpus Christi Coll. at Cambridge
* Other works at Lambeth Library
* Other works at Oxford's library
* Tractatus super Symbolum Majus et Minus at the Peterborough Library 
* Liber de Officiis Ecclesiasticis at the Peterborough Library
in addition to the spurious De Situ... and we should explain what happened to those extra ones. — LlywelynII 08:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography
Talk:Arthur Lithgow

message: In the article about arthur lithgow, it says he was a director of the Antioch Shakespeare Festival located in ANTIOCH, OHIO.  That is not right.
The Antioch Shakespeare Festival, actually the Antioch-Toledo Shakespeare Festival was located at Antioch College in Yellow Springs, Ohio.  The company did productions of Shakespeare in both locations, but it was only in Yellow Springs that ALL Shakespeare's plays were presented for the first time in the United States.  All the sonnets were also all read from the stage, sometimes during intermission and sometimes as a costumed thing before or after the production.
The stage was a replica of the Globe stage and was erected each summer in front of the main Administration Building on the Antioch Campus.
I'm very sure about this because in the Fifties, I was an aspiring actor from Springfield, Ohio, a town about ten miles north of Yellow Springs and I worked on the Festival backstage and had a few walk-ons as a spear chucker.
I still remember vividly a performance of MACBETH where Lithgow did the Macbeth part and one night during the performance, there was a storm and the lightning and wind and all the elements happened almost on cue.
But, it all happened in Yellow Springs, Ohio, not Antioch, Ohio.  I know because I was there.
thanks Honeybunny123 (talk) 20:59, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  arthur lithgow 
Talk:Arthur Lyman

message: Was his grandfather Rufus Anderson Lyman perchance? Just published an article on him, with many notable descendants. W Nowicki (talk) 23:18, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry? 

message: Was he born on Kauai (as mentioned in the infobox), or on Oahu (as stated in the plain text)? Guidje (talk) 19:51, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: Should Ritual_of_the_Savage be here?
:Was he listed in the credits?The lorax (talk) 22:04, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: ROTS
Talk:Robert Brackenbury

message: Does anyone have the blazon, or (better yet) an image of Brackenbury's arms?  Avalon 07:02, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arms

message: There's a section at the end discussing Brackenbury's conduct at Bosworth that should be better integrated into the rest of the article. It needs citations, but actually, since it argues completely from primary sources it smacks of being 'original research'. It would be better to simply cite and summarize secondary sources that discuss the matter.
Loren Rosen 04:48, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conduct at Bosworth 

message: It's the murder of the princes that is not proven. But Brackenbury is known to have given the keys to Richard's envoy. Valetude (talk) 19:53, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Other than Thomas More, an unreliable narrator in this case, what sources prove Brackenbury gave the keys to Richard III's envoy? Tx much. 2600:6C5D:17E:D0E8:480F:650D:A72B:D468 (talk) 16:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Princes in the Tower
Talk:Robert Harling (knight)

message: WP:Biography can add the following attributes: |military-work-group=yes |military-priority=low |politician-work-group=yes |politician-priority=Low - While the |auto=inherit can be removed as it serves no purpose. For WP:MILHIST Banner, the following can be added: |Biography=yes |British=yes |Medieval=yes ... The British and Medieval are updated versions of the longer versions listed above. Two WikiProjects can be added the WikiProject United Kingdom and WikiProject Politics. All in a WikiProjectBannerShell. Adamdaley (talk) 09:43, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:The Arsenal of Freedom

message: In the episode notes, it said about Crusher "The implication in this scene, expounded on in further episodes, is that she has a provocative history beyond her officially known one, but it is never explained exactly what this is." When was it ever hinted at that she had a provocative history? TwistedRed 02:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some people just work too hard to come up with trivia, when we don't even want any on wiki. Deleting it as it not noteworthy trivia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 03:38, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Also some other stuff, like the stardate mention, if you read thru the stardate article, it explains that it is unclear how exactly it works as it sometimes decreases and sometimes increases (30620.1 is before 23859.7 for instance).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 03:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provocative History? 

message: How did the producers film the Enterprise-D when the ship seperates?--BigMac1212 (talk) 02:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Memory Alpha claims it was re-used footage from Encounter at Farpoint. Miyagawa (talk) 11:48, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Shooting the seperated Enterprise

message: Ernie Anderson usually does the voice over of the previews of Season 1 episodes.  But not this episode:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dw2CD0eZPb8
Is that Don LaFontaine?--BigMac1212 (talk) 02:45, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Different announcer
Talk:Robert Wingfield

message: I believe his mother was Elizabeth Goushill rather than Elizabeth Russell. This information is cited in many sources and family trees.
The Peerage - Page 3358
Order of the Crown of Charlemagne - Page 42
Tudor Place - Wingfield Family Page
What are the sources of the name Elizabeth Russell?  
comment added by Mellie107 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother's Name
Template talk:DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Future

message: Please add CC-BY-SA version 3 to the list of versions. --Roger Chrisman 00:31, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is this page locked?  I also concur the call to add version 3 to this template.  It does say "all future versions".  It could use some images as well... (see User:Ericg/experimental/cc-by-sa.  PaulC/T+ 04:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: change made. CMummert · talk 20:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  version 3 

message: I've added an optional parameter (logo=yes) to add logos to this template:
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          	Multi-licensed with all versions of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License	
I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under the GFDL and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0, version 2.0, version 2.5, version 3.0, and all future versions of the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.	                                                                                        	
 
Can someone please implement this change? ~ PaulT+/C 07:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So changed. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:09, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  logo 

message: Please replace the text under the GFDL in this template with under Wikipedia's copyright terms, per meta:Licensing update/Result. Thanks. Anomie⚔ 20:30, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikimedia licensing update 

message: I request that this template be moved to :Category:Wikipedia copyright templates. It doesn't belong in :Category:Copyright user templates it should only be for userboxes. Catfurball (talk) 17:36, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: See Template_talk:TextLicenseFreeUse#Protected_edit_request_on_26_July_2021. — xaosflux Talk 18:54, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 26 July 2021 

message: Please change "version 3.0, and all future versions" to "version 3.0, version 4.0, and all future versions", as the default license has changed per the new Terms of Use. Thanks! Frostly (talk) 15:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please also add the category :Category:Wikipedians contributing under CC BY-SA 3.0. Thank you! Frostly (talk) 03:22, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:   * Pppery * it has begun... 01:54, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 7 June 2023
Talk:Blood and Fire (Star Trek: The Next Generation)

message: Now that I've watched the episode, the use of the term "dry humping" doesn't seem appropriate. I'm inclined to replace it with something more neutral.--Dvd-junkie (talk) 10:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "dry humping" remark 

message: I've added and clarified some details based on an interview that David Gerrold recently did in which he discusses the episode.  I'm very new to this whole editing thing, so I welcome feedback from more experienced folks.  this name is also in use 18:11, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gerrold interview