Talk:Islamic Bill of Rights for Women in the Mosque

message: The bulk of this page seems to be a direct copy of the Bill of Rights written by Asra Nomani and published in 'Standing Alone in Mecca'. There isn't even any commentary which could suggest a fair use defence. I don't think it can stay in the article. - Eron Talk 18:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you're right.  Jkelly 00:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The copyvio portion has been edited out now. - Eron Talk 23:04, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As an outsider coming in much later in the discussion, I don't think I agree.  First of all, the Bill of Rights is a very small portion of the book.  Second, the "work" amounts to a very small list on its own, that would be one sentence or paragraph at best, if the "women have an Islamic right to..." repetitions were removed.  Its use is no weightier than quoting a politician or a crime witness in the newspaper.  Third, I strongly believe that the author would call inclusion in Wikipedia fair use, rather than assert her "copyright" against it.  A fair use "defence" is not needed when there's nothing to defend against.  Therefore, I shall return the list to the article, and let this statement be my "fair use rationale".  See, for example: Articles of Faith (Latter Day Saints) Reswobslc (talk) 22:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: I've tagged this article as needing information about its impact. I wouldn't try to delete it, but it really doesn't contain any assertion of notability. Laudable though these goals may be, there's no indication that this "bill of rights" has done anything. Maybe some of the references labeled as external links can help, but without footnotes, it's hard to tell. --BDD (talk) 20:46, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Missing information" tag 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Islamic Bill of Rights for Women in the Mosque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070109173924/http://www.asranomani.com/freedom/archives/2005/02/about_the_daugh.php to http://www.asranomani.com/freedom/archives/2005/02/about_the_daugh.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930035238/http://www.wnyc.org/shows/lopate/episodes/2005/03/15 to http://www.wnyc.org/shows/lopate/episodes/2005/03/15
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604164440/http://english.aljazeera.net/news/archive/archive?ArchiveId=10514 to http://english.aljazeera.net/news/archive/archive?ArchiveId=10514
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080611185042/http://www.newsline.com.pk/NewsApr2005/bookapr.htm to http://www.newsline.com.pk/NewsApr2005/bookapr.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311025125/http://www.brandeis.edu/investigate/events/AsraNomanifullpage.html to http://www.brandeis.edu/investigate/events/AsraNomanifullpage.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Following is a work of fiction by Michael Muhammad Knight covers some aspects of activism. Idk deserves mention through a Section In popular culture? As of now just noting down for record.  Bookku    (talk) 08:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture?