lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Autofellatio

message: Risk factors are primarily related to muscle strain. In a Men's Health publication, sex counselor Eric Garrison says pulled muscles aren't uncommon. Another sex counselor, Cam Fraser, in an ABC report: "The only things that I could think of that could potentially go wrong could be if you're not limbered up enough, maybe pulling a muscle and hurting your back." Both men remark that STIs, such as herpes, can be transferred from the mouth to penis, and vice versa. Additionally, Garrison has encountered a few cases of men accidentally biting themselves.
--62.166.252.25 (talk) 19:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --62.166.252.25 (talk) 17:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Health risks
Talk:Warrington, England

message: The best way to approach this is to list the civil parishes forming the Borough.
The central part of Warrington is "unparished" but the ward (electoral districts) could be used here.
Cadishead is not in Warrington! Some of the other villages I haven't heard of though I live in Warrington.
==
no, Cadishead is Manchester, I suppose the boundry is the river/brook I think runs near glazebrook station? Or are Glazebrook and Holins green not counted as warrington - Glazebrook is in the GMPTE ticket zone. What about Warburton? Paul Weaver 22:12, 16 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warrington - villages
Talk:Jainism

message: There is a debate going on here that will affect this article. Greenhighwayconstruction (talk) 21:06, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox debate 
Talk:Shawn Mullins

message: I removed the factual dispute after verifying the information at various online stores that sell his CD's. The self-titled "Shawn Eric Mullins" album was apparently an indie cassette made by Shawn himself, of which about 500 copies are believed to exist. It was never released under an official record label, so I removed it from his discography. I am unsure what kinds of albums should go in a discography. For example, there are about 35 albums that Shawn Mullins appears on (compilations, live albums, etc), but I don't think they all belong in his discography in wikipedia. --HN Tue Jun  3 18:17:30 EDT 2003
Agree 71.80.36.167 22:45, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Kinks

message: Infobox says 1996. Article says 1997. Only two people have membership in the band ending in 1997. Others have it ending in 1996.
This needs clarity. 73.25.226.14 (talk) 19:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is debatable. There was no formal announcement. Here is a bit from Doug Hinman (2004, p. 342):  Tkbrett (✉) 20:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did they break up in 1996 or 1997? 

message: I've been making a few careful copyedits to this article, which I hope have improved a few things. I notice that the footnote style is very erratic and could do with sorting out. I can do that if there are no objections, but I wanted to bring it up on the Talk page first as it's quite a big alteration to the article. I'm talking about using the sfn template for pulling in all the repeated source citations, e.g. Doug Hinman's book is cited a massive 66 times (!) with full citation details, where a brief sfn link down to the cited book in the Sources section would suffice. The article currently contains only two short format links (Rogan 2015 refs. 34 and 93), whereas the Rogan 1998 refs (40, 56, etc.) are bare footnotes. There is no consistency and I'd really like to get it sorted! Incidentally, I'm fairly sure this issue could lead to a FAR notice. Regards, Rodney Baggins (talk) 12:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought about converting the mess to sfn myself, but it seemed like quite an undertaking. If you are willing to do it, that would be fantastic. We could also split the work, if you'd like. Tkbrett (✉) 12:11, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm more than willing to do it myself, just wanted to check it was OK with others. It wouldn't take too long once I got started.  Rodney Baggins (talk) 13:51, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you – also, I do not expect to hear from many other editors here, as the main author of this page () has been inactive for the last decade. Tkbrett (✉) 14:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've completed the sfn conversion apart from one that I can't track down. Any idea what Rogan, Johnny (2004) is referring to in refs. 10, 83, 138, 146 and 149? The only 2004 book I can find is his Van Morrison biography. Cheers, Rodney Baggins (talk) 08:20, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short format notes 

message: I was removing some genres from the infobox I found unnecessary due to the encompassing nature of the "rock" and "pop" listings, but I accidentally got rid of the lead image and do not know how to return it. I'm really sorry Ded Meem (talk) 04:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry
Talk:Gloria Swanson

message: She started as a walk-on, which is NOT the same thing as an extra. 79.79.156.110 (talk) 19:47, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walk-on 

message: She natrated the 1973 Post-Newsweek Productions documentary film The Age of Ballyhoo. FloridaArmy (talk) 06:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Narrator
Talk:Ethel Merman

message: There appears to be a fairly even split on whether she was born in 1908 or 1909 -- Someone else 01:24 4 Jun 2003 (UTC)
:On the 1910 census, taken in Aprilm she was 2. On the 1920 censusm taken Jan 1, she was 11. That makes 1908 the better choice.Questors 19:43, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In order for this person to remain in :Category:Gay icons, the article needs to mention this "fact" in the body and cite reliable sources to support it.  --Rob 17:59, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Gay icons]]

message: The bane of Wikipedia is articles wtitten by fans, who have to plug their idols.  The article is supposed to be neutral, not about how great Ethel Merman was.  I removed POV and weasel words and peacock terms.  Let the facts speak for themselves.
The reference to Merman's non-Jewish parentage and her Episcopalian baptism is a real eye-opener (I think most folks assume she was way Jewish), with a good source.  Gershwin's advice is another great entry, but it needs to be sourced.
This could be a great article, with proper sourcing and neutral POV. J M Rice (talk) 18:10, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a fan site 

message: I remember she was on "Evening at Pops"  on PBS television --- with the Boston Pops Orchestra conducted by Arthur Fiedler in the mid-1970s.  She sang her famous songs such as "Everything's Coming Up Roses" and "There's No Business Like Show Business", and "They Say That Falling in Love is Wonderful--and also "Embraceable You".  I remember those four well.  I am no great fan of hers, being primarily a classical musician, but it was a fine performance and still stays in my mind all these years later.   Of course she used no amplification---unlike all the other popular type singers who appeared with the "Pops".   
Sorry, I have no source or date for this show, but this appearance really ought to be included in this article. The programme was repeated at least once. So, if someone knows how to look this up and find when she performed at Symphony Hall in Boston for the television show "Evening At Pop's"   I think it would be a nice addition to the article.  Thanks!
-r
69.166.30.216 (talk) 18:52, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  television 

message: I removed a short item about her marriage to Ernest Borgnine. The source is a website and the story seems more apocryphal than genuine. I did the same thing to the Ernest Borgnine Wikipedia article seven years ago, without objection from editors. I would suggest this short marriage should be treated the same as the previous ones.Catherinejarvis (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal life 
Talk:Orange/Newark Tornadoes

message: Is this really Toradoes, why talk now when kentucy has 600 feet of snow! -- Zoe
:Tornadoes. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 6 July 2005 16:16 (UTC)
I removed 
" The Tornadoes' players and place in the league were given to George Preston Marshall, who founded the Boston Braves."
First the Tornadoes last played in 1930 and the Braves began in 1932, so the players would not have gone to the Braves, they would have had to find different teams for 1931. although it is very possible the Newark franchise  was sold to Marshall there is no actual proof that it was (according to the pro football researchers association). Also the NFL begans the Redskins history in 1932. This may be similar to Frankford=Philadelphia or Boston Yanks= Indianapolis Colts, There is also a theory that the Pottsville Maroons are now the Redskins based on the fact that they relocated to Boston and for years the NFL in its record book refer to G P Marshall reactiving in 1932 the old Boston team (which would be the PM/Boston Bulldogs). Smith03 03:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are there any connections between the NFL Tornadoes and the Orange/Newark Tornadoes-Newark Bears-Akron Bears of the American Association? 147.70.242.40 (talk) 02:29, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any relation/connection... 

message: I've been searching news sources for the time of the Newark Bears returning in 1963, and can't find any direct relation to the Bears of the 1940s. I'll keep digging but unless evidence can be found to support the idea that there is an actual connection between the franchises, I'm going to split that section into its own article. cholmes75 (chit chat) 14:43, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ACFL/CFL Newark Bears 

message: Why are the Newark Bears included in this article when they don't seem to be connected? It makes the topic more confusing and they should be separate topics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Armorbeast (talk • contribs) 02:02, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newark Bears
Talk:Jeeves and Wooster

message: "Bertie Wooster's car is an early 1930's Aston Martin. Chuffy Chufnell drives a Lagonda in series 2."
What about the Widgeon 2-seater? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by IanW (talk • contribs) 23:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wooster's Car 

message: Are the episodes dramatisations of the original stories, or were the stories created specifically for the series? If the former, how faithful are they to the Wodehouse? 165.91.64.170 (talk) 23:39, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They are adaptations of the stories/novels, with many changes to fit the TV format - generally, combining multiple stories into one. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 00:12, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

text: There's an element of Bowdlerisation too - we never see Bertie giving money to Jeeves while in the books the fiver on the mantlepiece is often apparent.Keith-264 (talk) 08:59, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: adaptations, or originals?

message: The article used to state that the theme is an adaptation of Irving Berlin's "Puttin on the Ritz" but I think anyone who's heard both tunes would say that this is clearly not true.  I think the confusion might stem from the fact that the song "Puttin on the Ritz" is featured in an episode of the show.  I went ahead and changed this, stating that the theme is an original piece written by Anne Dudley. Foscolo (talk) 05:23, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I sincerely disagree. The tune in Arthur is not "virtually identical" to the J&W theme. – Hattrem (talk) 01:42, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

text: Calling these two the same tune is a bit of a stretch. – Hattrem (talk) 23:15, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: theme song

message: Surely Clovelly, in North Devon, was where many if not all exterior shots depicting Chufnell Regis were filmed? --93.197.162.2 (talk) 20:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Chufnell Regis

message: I didn't want to edit such an important element without opening it up for discussion here first... but surely Wodehouse's Jeeves and Bertie stories, and these faithful adaptations, fall squarely in the category of "comedy," no? I am very familiar with both the books and these programs, and have never detected anything I'd call "serious content." Jcejhay (talk) 15:11, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "comedy-drama"? 

message: I've removed the locations section on the article.  This section had been around for years, tagged since 2015, and has no sources, and appears to be original research. Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long Term Unsourced Locations
Talk:Twenty-Four Histories

message: This article is pretty high up my startlingly long list of important China-related articles that need a lot of help. It seems like this article should probably be classified as a list, and another article should be created about the concept of Chinese dynastic histories itself—I was floored to realize this wasn't already the case, really. — Remsense聊 17:33, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  List?
Talk:Reuptake

message: (Sorry if that sounds snide or rude, but I have no idea of how to make this request any other way.)
The problem I have with this article -- & all of the related articles where this word appears (not all of which link back here, FWIW) -- is that after reading it I am left with only a vague & hazy idea of just WTF it describes. Undoubtedly the use of precise language makes this article accurate, yet at the expense of leaving non-experts at a loss for what it has described. In this case, what I think is happening in the process known as "reuptake" is that one nerve cell generates a given chemical compound (which I think includes serotonin, dopamine, norepinephrine, & so forth), which is transported to an adjacent nerve cell, performs some kind of chemical interaction there, then returns to the originating cell where it is reabsorbed. Adding an inhibitor (such as an SSRI, SNRI & the other articles which led me here) to this environment keeps the compound from being reabsorbed -- but I am unclear just how this is a good thing. Is keeping the specific chemical compound levels in the originating cell elevated a good thing? Or is it desirable to lower these levels, & force the compound to be absorbed by the target cell? 
And telling perplexed readers like me "you are not expected to understand this" is a cop-out. Experts in science find ways to explain technical problems like this to students, middle management, & lay persons all of the time. Sometimes the expert needs to sacrifice a bit of accuracy, or rely on analogies, to succeed in explaining this to them. Otherwise, what we have here is a piece of technical writing created by a specialist to be read by other specialists. -- llywrch (talk) 19:41, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I read the intro 2 paragraphs which seemed fine.  Then, after reading user:Llywrch's comment, I returned to the article, and immediately, was struck by the excessive length of the subsequent paragraphs.  Just breaking them into smaller sections would be a good improvement, to start.  And in the process,  the ideas would probably become clearer as well.--NinetyNineFennelSeeds (talk) 21:27, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

text: The primary function of reuptake is to reduce the level of neurotransmitter IN THE SYNAPSE, so that the post-synaptic neuron or muscle is not continuously stimulated by it. The secondary function is to take it back to the originating neuron for repackaging into vesicles for reuse when another signal is to be conveyed. UnderEducatedGeezer (talk)   —Preceding undated comment added 11:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A request for an English translation
Talk:Oxford

message: I saw that this page did not have a 'Governance' section. As such sections are fairly normal, being encouraged at WP:UKCITIES, I drafted one and added it this morning. However, my edit has been reverted without explanation by @MrDemeanour. I'd be grateful if the reason for its removal could be provided please - as far as I can see it was reasonably informative, uncontroversial and had adequate sourcing. I'm aware that there's a fuller article at Oxford City Council, which I signposted, but I still think there's value in having a short summary on the Oxford page too. From a quick sample of other English cities with similar local government structures, I see that Cambridge, Norwich, Worcester and Exeter all have governance sections on the page for the city as well as separate pages for their city councils. I'd like to reinstate a governance section for Oxford, but given that my previous attempt was reverted I would like to check here that there isn't consensus as to why such a section might be inappropriate for Oxford.
Many thanks Stortford (talk) 17:28, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Stortford That would be a cock-up, sorry. I was trying to revert something else. MrDemeanour (talk) 10:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for confirming - and I see someone else has already reverted the section. Stortford (talk) 12:06, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Governance 

message: There's an unreffed claim that High Street is normally referred to as 'The High'. While this was common usage within the University in times past, it's rarely employed today - I don't think I've ever heard an actual Oxford resident use it in the 35 years I've been living there. It has connotations of Bertie Wooster and Brideshead Revisited. If the claim is going to stay in the article it needs a specific ref. Ef80 (talk) 09:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's easy enough to find references showing it has been referred to as The High for a considerable time such as this from 1898 and  this from 1988, but referencing whether that's still the case now, or conversely that the term has since fallen out of use, would be much harder. WaggersTALK 10:36, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly, when I was a graduate student in the late 70s the term was already seen as archaic and was little used even in the University. I suspect it's just obsolete public school / undergraduate slang, but as you say, finding good refs to support this is difficult. --Ef80 (talk) 10:51, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "The High" is still fairly commonly used within the University, and survives in names such as "Honey's Of The High". Other similar names are definitely disappearing: "The Broad" is getting rare, and "The Turl" is almost unheard of these days. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 12:33, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The High
Talk:Battle of Dunkirk

message: The article appears to make no mention whatsoever of a key defensive action by the Allies. As it became clear that German forces would be attacking Dunkirk, the sluice gates that controlled the water levels on the low lying ground that virtually surrounds the port city were opened. Within a few days, the open fields were covered with water, leaving only elevated roads as the only route in for attackers. The Allied defensive positions were on the higher ground.
Not only did this confirm the wisdom of the "halt order" for German armour, but it substantially reduced the proportion of the defensive perimeter that could be meaningfully attacked.
A source that explains this well is Dünkirchen 1940 by Robert Kershaw, publ 2022, ISBN 978 1 4728 5437 7. This may be because the account is from the German point of view and it was the Germans who had to deal with attacking across a flooded landscape. There are other useful snippets in this source, such as the removal of many German units (to prepare for action south of the Somme) before Dunkirk had actually fallen. Also there is the huge under-estimate, in the final 24 hours, of the number of remaining French troops made by the French commanderthe result being that the mass of non-combatant troops who had been hiding for much of the battle suddenly appeared for the last evacuation of French troops. The result being that many French combat troops never got out. R Kershaw explains how important it was to the British to extract the experienced front line troops as they were the "seed corn" of the expanded British Army that fought the rest of the war. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 21:28, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flooding: an astounding omission
Talk:Body modification

message: I have split this article between itself and List of body modifications, as the list was overwhelming the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Notcharizard (talk • contribs) 01:35, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: I just came to this page to read about body modification in general, and because of this copy-paste job, there are three paragraphs about body modification in general, followed by thirty-nine paragraphs about various forms of genital modification, with nothing about non-genital modification.
The result of this is that this article reads extremely strangely now, with an obsessive focus on genitalia modification to the exclusion of everything else. This seems, at best, an unencyclopedic choice. Also, I don't see why we need the exact same content appearing on two separate articles. --FPTI (talk) 01:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article [[Genital modification and mutilation]] was copy-pasted here.
Talk:Gustave Ador

message: Does someone know, why he resigned so early?
Patrice Neff 16:17 4 Jun 2003 (UTC)
:Age? (see 1). -- User:Docu
Also found him in the Servet-i Funun. I wonder what other historical photos there are of him in old publications https://archives.saltresearch.org/bitstream/123456789/129372/68/PFSIF9180124A416.jpg WhisperToMe (talk) 01:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Northern Europe

message: Just wanted to point out that under Classifications > EuroVoc, there is a map of countries coloured depending on their status. Whilst Denmark is listed as part of Northern Europe, it is coloured green, which represents Western Europe in this map. I don't know how to change this but thought it should be pointed out. Ollie HF (talk) 19:15, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the map as it was WP:OR, it had been created by a Wikipedia editor with no referencing to EuroVoc itself. TylerBurden (talk) 21:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: legend Ollie HF (talk) 22:42, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mapping Error
Talk:La Géométrie

message: Is it correct to call it a book? My understanding was that La Géométrie was an appendix to a philosophical work of Descartes'. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BRG (talk • contribs) 18:03, 4 June 2003  (UTC)
:This is also suggested by Bertrand Russell's History of Western Philosophy, and supported by , so I changed it. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 21:21, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Hormone therapy

message: How do you get hrs hormones for mtf Chelsey41 (talk) 03:47, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malcolm/Chelsey vineyard 

message: This looks like a list of therapies with any involvement of any hormone. Better to change it to a disambiguation page ? - Rod57 (talk) 16:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better as a disambiguation page