Talk:Downtown Santa Ana

message: I propose merging Downtown National Register District into this article, Downtown Santa Ana Historic Districts.  This article name is the National Register of Historic Places' official name and it is more descriptive.  There seem to be 3 or more local historic districts included in the NRHP nomination.  The local name may well be "Downtown National Register District" but that is not a suitable article name.  Only one article is needed to cover the NRHP listing and the possibly multiple local listings for overlapping districts, i think. --doncram (talk) 17:44, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: merger

message: You are correct in stating that the National Register of Historic Places lists Downtown Santa Ana into more than one district. I see only two districts listed in the National Register as it pertains to the Downtown. These are North which is described as Governmental and / or Institutional, and South which is the retail section. I understand that French Park is listed as a historic district there too, is French Park to be included or thought of as part of the Downtown also? The National Register describes the Downtown as being roughly bounded by Civic Center Dr., First, Ross, and Spurgeon Sts. French Park is north of Civic Center but if you want to think of French Park as being synonymous with the Downtown, I'm okay with that. That makes sense because of the many historic homes there. 
Also, because of the roughly bounded tag, we may consider including the Chiarini building on 3rd and Olive streets as part of the Downtown.
I'll make changes to my article to remove any unnecessary info and then you may do a full merger. O. Ian Ávalos (talk) 10:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: repsonse

message: An image used in this article, File:Howe-Waffle House 02.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Howe-Waffle House 02.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:54, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Howe-Waffle House 02.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Content from Downtown National Register District now merged into this article.
Former talk page is at Talk:Downtown National Register District
14GTR (talk) 12:02, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: merger completed

message: I have removed the unreferenced lists of eating establishments none of them had their own articles so are not deemed notable by Wikipedia standards. Theroadislong (talk) 17:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive lists of non notable restaurants etc 

message: The short description is indeed "roughly bounded", but the full description says "Boundaries are based upon remaining integrity as discussed in the text, and are shown on attached Legal Boundary Plan. The drawings leave nothing to the imagination.  I'll make the necessary corrections. Generic1139 (talk) 20:40, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roughly bounded