Talk:Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service

message: Given that the UK Conservative Party has announced that it will scrap CAFCASS if it gets into power, the various contoversies surround CAFCASS, the recent resignation of it entire board, nd the delaythat use of CAFCASS itself introdes itothpoces of resolving child residence disputes, etc., it might be worth spicing this article up bit. (It's worth looking at its history pages in this regard). One comment that I thought well reflected the systemic problem of CAFCASS's role (which was made by Tony Coe of the Equal Parenting Coalition) was that CAFCASS can be likened to a fire brigade that upon arrival at a fire sits and makes a report about it. Obviously the conclusion of each report is that [[the building has burnt down. If CAFCASS was not merely a court reporting device then it could be instrumental in helping to resolve problems rather than merely watching them get worse. Matt Stan 11:59, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Role of CAFCASS

message: I have removed various parts of this section and renamed it Criticism of CAFCASS.  Given the nature of the statements they should be referenced in order to be verifiable.  Some look just plain inaccurate. Referencing and verifiability of such material is a key part of making Wikipedia an effective encyclopedia. Paulleake 16:53, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Controversy" 

message: Please provide some sources for some of your claims of what CAFCASS is doing wrong. The reason the page has been semi-protected is you do not give any verfiable sources at all and a lot of the the things there are personal opinions and and facts. Sasquatch  t|c 18:05, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  To the Anon 

message: The Criticism section is very outdated. There is more current information here and here. I'm also not sure the name of the section is appropriate - is it meant for all commentary on Cafcass or only for the negative? The reason I ask is that the recent national Ofsted is more positive, and it also points out an upward trend in the local reports Best wishes to all, DBaK (talk) 12:20, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section 

message: I agree with the editor who was of the view that this is an article with some issues and I'm aiming to work on it in the next few days to improve it.  Does anyone wish to help?  If not, I'll just go ahead and make some edits.  Thanks. 
Sharonbott (talk) 16:22, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamp, tidy up, rewrite? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131102025004/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/217343/family-justice-review-final-report.pdf to https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/217343/family-justice-review-final-report.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:01, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified