Talk:Hops

message: Gspurzem added the content below, among other changes, which I reverted for the reasons given. Value of the edits is up for discussion as needed. --Zefr (talk) 15:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Chemical composition

message: In the history section, the earliest use in brewing should be changed. A historical work of Jewish law, known as the "Talmud Bavli" or Babylonian Talmud, written/compiled early 3rd to early 6th century ("Talmud and Midrash (Judaism):: The making of the Talmuds: 3rd-6th century" encyclopedia Britannica. encyclopedia Britannica online. 2008. Retrieved 28, October 2013) mentions the use of hops in regards to the brewing of beer Schottenstien Babylonian Talmud English full size [#41] Vol. 1. Page 43B Ed. Rabbi Hersh Goldwurm. Brooklyn: Artscroll Mesorah Publicatons, 1993. Print. Being that the Talmud was compiled prior to the quoted earliest mention someone should change it.
Shaikster (talk) 18:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section should be revised 

message: U.S. production reportedly ranks No. 1 due to poor crop in Germany in 2015. Sca (talk) 16:24, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Production chart

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hops. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120315195032/http://jongriffin.com/articles/understanding-beer/ to http://jongriffin.com/articles/understanding-beer/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110713020710/http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx to http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.btinternet.com/~hunny.pot/homepage/hopping.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:34, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hops. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929072147/http://www.hops.co.uk/sectionone/Worcester.htm to http://www.hops.co.uk/sectionone/Worcester.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120310182625/http://www.agroatlas.ru/cultural/Humulus_lupulus_K_en.htm to http://www.agroatlas.ru/cultural/Humulus_lupulus_K_en.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140725154905/http://www.britishhops.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Asia-Pacific-Final-Paper.pdf to http://www.britishhops.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Asia-Pacific-Final-Paper.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141207113939/http://www.horsecollaborative.com/beer-breakthrough-hops-may-prevent-pasture-associated-laminitis/ to http://www.horsecollaborative.com/beer-breakthrough-hops-may-prevent-pasture-associated-laminitis/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Just curious. In the English Wikipedia, why two topics on this plant? One topic under the common name (Hops) and the other under the scientific name (Humulus lupulus)? I would think just one topic Humulus lupulus, and redirection from Hops to Humulus lupulus. I came here (Hops) looking for the Spanish name, but the Spanish topic (and other languages) are labeled by the scientific name, so no link from Hops to the Spanish Humulus lupulus which is linked to the English Humulus lupulus. Merely curious. --Catrachos (talk) 02:51, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why two topics with different titles regarding this plant in Enlish  

message: The history section remains a mess, because it is relying on sources that are themselves inaccurate and confused. The claim in HS Corran's book that hops are mentioned being used in beer in 1079 is supposedly from something written by Hildegard of Bingen - but Hildegard wasn't born until 1098. She died in 1179. See my book Beer: The Story of the Pint, p281. The claim by Unger that 'hops were condemned as late as 1519 as a "wicked and pernicious weed"' is nonsense and should be deleted: no such condemnation is to be found. This is all, of course, my original research, but you can find my debunking of Unger's story here Zythophile (talk) 03:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The history section is still a mess 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Bale Breaker Brewing Company. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 9#Bale Breaker Brewing Company until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 15:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bale Breaker Brewing Company" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: 2 pages for the same object : someone should merge them. 185.215.65.24 (talk) 15:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Your suggestion to merge hops has been actioned. Go to the Discussion on the Merge template to make a case. Ex nihil (talk) 16:18, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humulus_lupulus