lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wynyard Park, Sydney

message: Article was overwritten by User:Source123 with what looked like commercial priorities (and spelling errors) to be about a UK business park called Wynyard Park. It was originally a well-written stub about a park in Sydney, Australia. I have reverted to the Australian place. Source123, if you want to create a proper article about Wynyard Park UK, I believe you need to create a new article and add a disambiguation note to this article "For the UK business park, see (your article)". It is inappropriate to overwrite an existing article with a completely different topic.
Tale 03:44, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: I have just become aware of Wynyard Park, County Durham, former seat of the Marquesses of Londonderry. I came to this page hoping to find the connection: why was Sydney's Wynyard Park so named? Can anybody help?
Also, I read recently that the military force which overthrew Bligh as Governor set out from what is now Wynyard Park. If true, this is an interesting part of the Park's history, and worth a mention  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.149.10 (talk) 22:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming History?
Talk:Chamsuri-class patrol boat

message: Speed: 37 knots (69 km/h; 43 mph)
Range:  7 knots (13 km/h; 8.1 mph)
170t displacement and 2 Diesel Engines... patrol boats need to be fast, at least 35 knots, this one is maybe older, modern patrol boats can do 50 knots, but such speed is only used for a short period to catch up vessels. 7 knots has to be an error... also there is not writen at which speed, at 37 knots I guess, with 20 knots it would be over 15 knots and with 14 knots it would be maybe 25... range below 250km is useless, there is a pursuit and right in it the ship stops because the fuel is empty^^ Kilon22 (talk) 22:53, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 Diesel Engines and such a range? 
Talk:Thenewno2

message: To all Wikipedia editors, and especially American ones: please, stop using "national" (or other words that refer to some country) without specifying which country you're actually talking about. Some Americans may be narcissistic enough to relate any mention of "national" to their own country, but to the rest of the world, this is terribly unclear. /rant Arno Sluismans (talk) 19:48, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "National"
Talk:Naza Sutera

message: I disagree! It does NOT use a Daihatsu engine.
:Hafei Lobo/Naza Sutera use Mitsubishi 4A31 Engine that was also used in the Proton Juara (rebadged Mitsubishi Town Box Wide). - 202.247.176.38 15:56, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Engine

message: Naza Forza
sources
* http://chinacarforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=851 (English)
* http://www.motortrader.com.my/NUS/articles/article_1205/page_m.asp (English -- That page said the Forza is a renamed Sutera.)
* http://manager.co.th/Motoring/ViewNews.aspx?NewsID=9510000034027 (Thai language news)
202.28.27.6 (talk) 04:37, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: another name
Talk:Brian Jungen

message: Why was the title of Cetology changed to Shapeshifter?! -NeoThe1 04:07, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wongaksa Pagoda

message: since there seems to be no established english name, & Wongaksajisipcheungseoktap looks like kittens playing on the keyboard, how about Wongaksa Pagoda? Appleby 00:37, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I came across a reference in a Korean art book today, the copy right which was 1962 I believe, where it was referred to as Wongak-sa Pagoda so I guess I'm leaning towards that or Wongaksa Pagoda or Wonggak-sa Tap?  Tortfeasor 23:45, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

text: So Wongaksa Tap or Wongaksa Pagoda.  I would prefer the latter but there is precedent with Seokgatap and Dabotap.  Although, those are two very famous pagodas.  Tortfeasor 03:27, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

text: sounds good.  do we need other people for a consensus on this insignificant issue?  Tortfeasor 06:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:MFA Program for Poets & Writers

message: OK.  I am still editing the page.  But I think this program deserves a spot.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Writersblock2222 (talk • contribs) .
The faculty include some of the most successful writers and poets in America.  Sabina Murray won the PEN/Faulkner award and has written screenplays starring Nick Nolte; James Tate is arguably the greatest living American poet and has won BOTH the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize!  The program hosts literary events that draw national audiences, like the Juniper Festival and Juniper Institute.
Thanks.  I'll try to keep working on the page 'til it's satisfactory.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nsevs (talk • contribs) .
I think if the Iowa Writers Workshop merits its own page, then so too does this one. It may seem like blatant advertisement, but that is why the content must be pared down to relevant and factual information that does not focus on the program with an overall "awed and flawed" perspective. Icarus of old 07:06, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Unlike the Iowa Writers' Workshop, countless MFA programs have a title that is identical or at least similar to this one. This page should not be about one particular school, but about MFA programs for writers in general. -Cyberscribe 15:54, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Many Universities Have A Program With A Similar Name
Talk:Fire (1996 film)

message: Agreed but what about the others? Is there a balanced POV?
202.156.6.54 07:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As there are no other reviews cited in this article, I'm not sure what precisely you're referring to. Rebecca 07:03, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for Balance

message: I find this plot summary to be particularly focused on the masculine aspects of the plot. I find this pretty insulting considering this is a movie about a relationship between two women. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by FelixFortuna (talk • contribs).
:If you can see changes that need to be made, feel free to make them. --Belovedfreak 14:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased Plot Summary

message: Hi there! I'll be editing this page over the next few days for a class project for a college class. I'll be addressing events that surrounding the screening of the film in India, as well as well as the public dialogue around it, and linking it up to related topics. Lokchi (talk) 20:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  editing this page for class project 
Talk:Manasseh

message: So I am Damir. I can not fine how do contact with you?
I have a materials about Manashe or Manas. In our tradions and customs have more close things betweem Jews people. so many things. please write to this address [redacted email] or [redacted email] ok I hope you will write back. God bless you!
with blessing Damir. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.29.25.28 (talk) 10:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  letter from Damir KYRGYZSTAN
Category talk:Russian people

message: Let's clarify the scope of this category. There are two possible interpretations of "Russian people": citizens of Russia () and ethnic Russians (). I'm quite sure that this category should be restricted to the first meaning. It is, after all, a subcategory of :Category:People by nationality. If anyone needs to emphasize the ethnicity, there are categories like :Category:Russian-Americans.
A trickier question is whether Soviet people should be categorized here. My opinion is that they shouldn't; USSR and Russia are different countries, and :Category:Soviet people should be used for those who lived most of their life in the Soviet Union.
What do people think? Conscious 04:41, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Btw, I also think that if we decide not to put Soviet people in this category, we should neither put them into the categories of other Soviet republics. Conscious 04:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ethnicity is out of question. The whole cathegory is about nationality. A technical question: What about those born before / died after 1922 and born before / died after 1992? Shouldn't they be cathegorized as both Russian and Soviet people? I am a bit puzzled about which part of life should be considered most. Should we decide this arithmetically? Alexei Kouprianov 07:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's easy. If a person has done something significant in their area during the time period, they should be in the corresponding category. Kasparov, for example, is a Soviet and Russian chess player, but I see no need to categorize Detsl (born in 1983) as Soviet rapper :) Conscious 09:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I personally think that this category and the likes (American people, Irish people...) should be deleted. When you read an article about some Russian scientist, for example, it already says in the article that he is Russian. I don't really see any sense in having such categories. KNewman 08:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I, for one, find "occupations by nationality" categories very useful. One can see, for example, the coverage of Russian poets on Wikipedia. Where else would one find it? Conscious 09:40, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

text: "The Peoples of Russia" (or formerly, "The Peoples of the Soviet Union") would indicate multiple ethnicities within the Russian territory (realizing of course that the territories of Russia and the Soviet Union are not the same, it's only that citing the Soviet Union makes the "Peoples of" a bit clearer). "The Russian People" on the other hand refers to a mono-ethnic nation/culture without regard to specific borders. If the vote is is for the former meaning, then perhaps a slight renaming would clarify it for all. Pēters J. Vecrumba 02:11, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The scope of this category
Category talk:Traditional Chinese medicine

message: I think that Dan tien (sp?) deserves an article, considering its significance with respect to human anatomy within TCM systems. Personally, I do not consider myself at all qualified to write such an article, but if need be I may draft something to get it started. Shaggorama 04:42, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good find. I've been looking for this article for ages! --Salix alba (talk) 07:25, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article request
Talk:Queens Giant

message: Can we get a photo of this tree in the spring or summer? It looks dead in the picture.
:I agree.  It would also be helpful if the picture included some frame of reference so that we could comprehend the size of the tree.  For instance, a person standing at the base of the tree would give us a sense of scale.  --Wechselstrom (talk) 23:07, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spring, Summer?
Talk:Duncan

message: I have added a "see also" section. I think that it is suitable, especially as it contains Iain Duncan Smith, as he is relatively famous (a few people might come to the page looking for him). It is possible that another disambiguation page for those people could be created, and then a link to that page could replace the links in the current see also section (for all I know, such a page could already exist (if so, could someone please take care of this)). RedvBlue 11:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Duncan#See also|See also]] section
Talk:Progressive Party (United States, 1924–1934)

message: Do we need to split off the La Follette Progressives information into a new article with the above name? --Orange Mike 03:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are many dozens of articles on Wisconsin Progressives where the old link will take readers to this article instead of the new one, I fear. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 17:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started working on that a bit - if you come across any let's re-direct --Wintersdoor (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progressive Party of Wisconsin 

message: The article should be moved to 'Progressive Party (United States 1924-1946). GoodDay (talk) 18:04, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 20:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name
Talk:Mangrove monitor

message: Much too brief and needs more scientific information on the animal and more elevated language and grammar. - Patman2648 05:02, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Close to unencyclopediac tone and poorly sorted information SatuSuro 05:27, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's getting there.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 19:44, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Still needed
Talk:Mount Baden-Powell

message: San_Gabriel_Mountains#Major_peaks 96.251.114.56 (talk) 16:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fourth or Fifth Highest Peak? 

message: In my perception, it is the only mountain in the world called 'Mount Baden-Powell', so why does it need an extra '(California)' designation in the title? I propose that this article be moved to simply Mount Baden-Powell. Wim van Dorst (Talk) 21:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: agree-I did remove the parenthesis per WP:MoS, but if there is not another, "California" should be removed entirely. Chris 22:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I was just going to bring this up.  Did a bit of search and cannot find any other Mount Baden-Powell.  --Gadget850 ( Ed) 22:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article called .... (California)...? 

message: I'm afraid I don't have anything to contribute to this page, except the observation that if the quoted dedication speech was given on the summit of Mt Baden-Powell, as it seems to have been, in 1931, the first ascent could not have been by Weldon Heald in 1933.  Weldon Heald is remembered for becoming the first person to ascend one hundred Southern California mountain summits of more than 5,000' elevation.  Perhaps his first ascent of Baden-Powell was in 1933.  In any case, the San Gabriel Mountains were crawling with weekend explorers from the late nineteenth century. Wikisimonov (talk) 16:05, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First ascent 

message: # I changed the elevation from NGVD 29 to NAVD 88 and provided a citation.
# Cleanup a number of other technical details.
# Quotations usually should not include links. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Quotations. Somebody needs to look a this. I didn't change anything.
# The quoted material might be still copyrighted. See Public domain#Expiration. There needs to be a citation showing that they are public domain.
# I changed the caption for the map in the gallery. I removed "Park service". I doubt the trail is maintained by the National Park Service. It could be part of the Pacific Crest Trail. Someone needs to check that out and it should be referred to in the section of the article that talks about the trail.
--DRoll (talk) 02:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical stuff 

message: This article was listed on the copyright problems board on Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2008 December 4 due to the extensive quotations incorporated. Unless material is public domain or licensed compatibly with the GFDL, Wikipedia is bound by the non-free content guidelines which limit the purpose and extensiveness of quoted material. As that document notes, "Extensive quotation of copyrighted text is prohibited." This material has been removed and should not be restored in its entirety unless it is demonstrably public domain or released for use here. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:55, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Extensive quotation
Talk:Echo Mountain

message: this is the first I've heard of hydrogen at Echo Mountain. I don't know that it's wrong, but I just got back from a hike up there, and the signs at the location described a tank for gasoline that was piped up to run the generators, but nothing I noticed about hydrogen. I'll take a look at some of my Altadena history books, but unless there were blimps or something I can't think of what craziness would lead to piping hydrogen around.
Montyy0 04:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that I see in the photo of Echo Mountain the remains of the Caltech T on the side of the mountain. This extends vertically about 400 feet and  was created by a brush-clearing expedition of the students of Throop Polytechnic Institute on a special school holiday on Christmas, 1916 IIRC. Another expedition of students  to Long Beach, CA immediately reported that the T was legible at that distance.  A few years later Throop Polytechnic was renamed California Institute of Technology and retained the T monogram.  The T has remained clearly visible on the school's Pasadena campus for most of the years since it appeared. 76.115.186.134 (talk) 00:36, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  hydrogen gas? 
Talk:Bell of King Seongdeok

message: Tortfeasor asked me about what to title this article, so here are the results of my cursory research:
* The Gyeongju Museum's English website and the Korean National Heritage website both use Seongdeokdaewangsinjong. This orthography, however, only returns 15 Google results. According to Korea Land Portal and one or two other ROK government sites, the official name is "Bell of King Seongdeok the Great."
* In November 1996 there was an "International Conference on the Divine Bell of King Songdok" in Seoul, whose proceedings were published in the Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. "Bell of King Seongdeok" is also used by Arts Council Korea. So I did a Google query of "Bell of King Seongdeok" OR "Bell of King Songdok" OR "Bell of King Song-dok" OR "Bell of King Sungduk" OR "Bell of King Sung-duk" to cover the various romanizations (Google treats hyphens as spaces), returning 792 results. Around a third of those take the specific form "Divine Bell of King [...]"
* Reversing the word order, there were 685 results on "King Seongdeok bell" OR "King Songdok bell" OR "King Song-dok bell" OR "King Sungduk bell" OR "King Sung-duk bell".
* All Yonhap references I found say it is "more commonly called Emille Bell." A Google query on "Emille bell" OR "Emilae bell" returns 659 results.
Google tests are of course a very imprecise measure of use, but it seems the current name is uncommon among English speakers. A title which indicates at least that the object is a bell will be more useful to English readers; a shorter name would also be easier to spell and link. IMHO then, I would make the title of the article Bell of King Seongdeok, since "Emille bell" is merely a nickname and not overwhelmingly more popular. We can then note all of these names in the introduction and create any needed redirects.-choster 14:55, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Choster:  Thanks for the response.  So I guess Bell of King Seongdeok or Divine Bell of King Seongdeok would probably be best?  Tortfeasor 23:17, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Brevity is good.  I'd support "Bell of King Seongdeok." I would have thought that "Emille Bell" was more common -- but not so, apparently.  -- Visviva 12:03, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should I make a new page?  Is that the propert way to do it?  With the new page being Bell of King Seongdeok based on the consensus and brevity with redirects for the other names?  Tortfeasor 05:31, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please move the article rather than creating a new page. See :meta:Help:Moving a page on wheels! for help. --Kusunose 06:33, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the help.  Tortfeasor 06:38, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Is it ever rung? Badagnani 02:32, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Korean article says it was rung on and off between 1992 and 2003. The Korean article says it's forbidden now. --Kjoonlee 12:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rung?
Talk:Pangkor Island

message: Hi! How can i create a smaller version of the image? Thanks Reinhard Kroisenbrunner
: use (number)px in the thumb format of the image. Chongkian (talk) 06:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitles

message: I've added an islands infobox, and moved much of the advert material such as promotional language and images to the Wikivoyage page. Speciific tourism information can go there. PaintedCarpet (talk) 18:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy Edit
Talk:Cardrona Bra Fence

message: The article does not flow very well, at the start it says "The fence is on farm property..." later on it says "...on council property..." so what is it, private, or council? Brian | (Talk) 05:09, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Btw I do remember hearing on One News, the other day that the council; had ordered it to be removed Brian | (Talk) 05:12, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was recently advised that the fence was re-erected within the private property adjacent the road reserve, and that the decoration has proceeded again. Can anyone validate this ? Is it now beyond reach of officialdom ?Viferpilot 02:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cardrona Bra Fence rumour 

message: mental_floss (reasonably popular American "edutainment" type magazine) mentioned this in one of their most recent print edition's issues (well, most recent as of the time of this post, at any rate). I believe it was in their "Golden Lobe Awards" issue, but it could have been the one before that. It was almost certainly one published in the latter half of 2007 or in early January, 2008, I know that much. It wasn't a very big article, but it was definitely in there, and it even covers a few small details this WP article leaves out, like the supposed motivations of some of the women (yes, women) who left bras on the fence. Properly cited and carefully inserted, it might be a nice thing to add as a reference, at least once we figure out exactly which issue it was and what page it was on. :) 4.235.45.147 (talk) 23:25, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: mental_floss article

message: Any articles out there discussing how environmentally unsound this is? Kingturtle (talk) 19:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  environment 
Talk:Lexa Pierce

message: The content needs to be improved, maybe some of the information from the Mutant X (TV series) would be appropriate.
John (Jwy) 05:10, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: cleanup
Talk:Ric Grech

message: Looks like this page is suffering from neglect.  I'm collecting sources to bring it up to snuff.  If anyone has information they think needs to be included, feel free to post links here.
Valis55 (talk) 02:42, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time for a rewrite 

message: How did he spell his first name?  I only remember seeing it spelled with the k, which makes me think that's how he was credited on Blind Faith.  I'd like to see some evidence that he spelled his name that way to support the move from Rick Grech to Ric Grech.  Google finds 33,400 pages for "Rick Grech" (and 72 within Wikipedia) vs 25,400 (32 in WP) for "Ric Grech."  To me, the counts are close enough to be inconclusive.  Sources supporting either spelling would be useful.  Alcuin 05:11, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's listed as "Rick Grech" on the cover of Welcome to the Canteen—you can clearly see it even in the low-res scan here on Wikipedia.  I've never seen it spelled "Ric" before now.  But perhaps I live in the wrong country to have a strong opinion on the matter.  I think both names should be considered acceptable, and possibly even "Ric" should redirect to "Rick" (rather than vice versa), but as long as both work, I don't think it's a big deal.  Xtifr tälk 22:15, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, we have the same problem with the likes of Reebop Kwaku Baah and alternate spelling Rebop Kwaku Baah, and Rosko Gee with alternate spelling Rosco Gee. They're actually spelled in different ways on different albums... strange...--HisSpaceResearch 08:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added an infobox.--HisSpaceResearch 10:13, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ric or Rick? 

message: Just to note when he died his date of Birth was given as 1 November 1945 not 1946. But it is only as reliable as the person who registered the death. MilborneOne (talk) 21:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth