lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Melbourne International Arts Festival

message: I have cleaned up, wikified and referenced the article. There is still much work that needs to be done. Capitalistroadster 11:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An IP user (202.130.195.90) who has recently edited this article, has removed the following contents a second time without edit summary. If there is no good reason for deleting this material, I will restore it. Political interference into the programing integrity of a public arts festival seems like a notable aspect to me. The section in question is:
:In 2003, Andrew Olexander, the Victorian Opposition Arts Spokesman criticised the Festival for selecting a show called I Am Blood. Mary Delahunty, the Minister for the Arts, stated that the Festival should select material without political interference. [3]
This statement was referenced with:
:[3] Govt should not veto arts festival, Minister says ABC MacquarieNet 2003 (online edition) Accessed 28 June 2006
Cheers -Enki H. (talk) 01:01, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent removal of 2003 controversy 

message: The page name of this article should be changed to Melbourne Festival. As of 2003, the Festival is no longer referred to as Melbourne International Arts Festival. Davidgeoffreyh (talk) 00:36, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change page name 

message: : I've reverted your cut and paste move (WP:RM is the correct way if pagemove won't work. That said, I'm also reverting the change of name in the absence of official / reliably sourced evidence that such a name change has occurred. The primary problem is that the official site and its press releases still use "Melbourne Festival" and the MF logo for 2018 -- see https://www.festival.melbourne/. If you have such current evidence that it is actually changing from MF back to MIAF, please add it, but the MWF is not sufficient (people continue to call all sorts of things by old names) -- and indeed I can't see that that the MWF page provides any evidence of such a change. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 08:20, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming / move
Talk:Tibthorpe

message: "TIBTHORPE township contains 2,885 acres of land lying along the eastern acclivity of the Wolds. The surface is generally elevated, and the soil of a lighter quality than that in the rest of the parish. The township is valued for rating purposes at £2,882, and had at the last enumeration 278 inhabitants. The Earl of Londesborough, who is also lord of the manor; Sir Tatton Sykes, Bart., D.L.; Mr. A. Botterill, Garton-on-the-Wolds; Mr. R. Harrison, Driffield; Simpson Staveley Esq., Tibthorpe; Mr. W. Harrison, Tibthorpe; D. Dent Esq., Rispin Mr. J. Loadman, Helmsley; and Mr. J. Harrison, Tibthorpe, are the principal landowners. The village is situated about one mile west of Kirkburn, and five miles south-west of Driffield."
(I removed the above section from the article. --RobthTalk 11:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Extract from Bulmer's History and Directory of East Yorkshire (1892)
Talk:István Széchenyi

message: Can someone look at the sentence "In particular, he won the Leipzig Battle for Field-Marshal Schwarzenberg and led the Swedish Crown-Prince in the war against Napoleon." please? Perhaps, the author meant that Szechenyi participated in the Battle of Leipzig, but the second part is even less clear (since Charles XIV John of Sweden was very active in forming a coalition against Napoleon without any persuasion). Tankred 11:46, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one did it, I changed this previouslyunclear sentence.. Tankred 15:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Dear Editors! I have started to re-edit this article. It is very rough and lacks a comprehensive structure. I will continue the work step by step and I kindly ask all, who are interested to write feedbacks or objections. Thanks. kuko 17:31, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major edit 

message: My note: His book, entitled VILAG means WORLD, not light. Vilag also means "feny" as in the English word "Moon-Light". It is best doubtful that after returning from England and seeing the country's needs he would write the Credit, The "Feny" and the Stadium.
The original full title of his work is "Világ vagyis felvilágosító töredékek némi hiba s előitélet eligazítására". It doesn't mean WORLD (világ), but világ(osság). "light", "enlightenment", "german: Klarheit, Aufklärung". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ResetGomb (talk • contribs) 10:01, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Világ 
Talk:Single rider

message: This article is lacking proper references and I'm flagging it as such: at present there is only one and it's a primary source. Ogre lawless (talk) 20:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is anyone opposed to removing the list of attractions that has a single-rider line? I don't foresee a reliable source being available for this information.FirstDrop87 (talk) 02:40, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Does this article need to exist in its current form?  All amusement parks -- not just Disney's -- have (or had) some sort of single rider policy, including special lines for them.  This article is too Disney-centric for something that is an industry practice. SpikeJones 11:50, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not so much that it's an extremely Disney-centric article when other parks also have single rider lines, but that this article doesn't seem... well, encylopedic... to me.   Is this page really necessary at all? SpikeJones 04:02, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Feel free,  I created the page based off what I knew in Disney Parks.  LordBleen 03:55, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Industry-wide, not just Disney
Talk:Kentaro Miura

message: Source:  KyuuA4 (Talk:キュウ) 03:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death on May 6 

message: Kentaro Miura passed away on 20th May 2021. 94.79.209.35 (talk) 15:18, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:20, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Not done: According to every source on the matter (ANN, Hakusensha, Oricon News, etc), he died on May 6. It just wasn't reported on until May 20. What source says he died on the 20th? Link20XX (talk) 15:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 May 2021 

message: Honestly with all the improvements and expansion this article has seen over the past 24 hours, with a bit more cleanup it could probably be made into a GA. Link20XX (talk) 02:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA? 

message: He died 20 of May 2021 not 6 I think you made a typo but I'm not sure 2A02:1388:409C:8864:0:0:1B86:5B04 (talk) 10:15, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Check the sources. It was announced on May 20 that he died on May 6. - Xexerss (talk) 10:59, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 May 2021 

message: I unfortunately cannot quickly grab a picture of him, but the present one on his page is one of the performer and former youtuber Joji (Filthy Frank) and since there is a (slight) resemblance, I can see why this might be a source of article abuse. But please, if any one can fix it that would be appreciated Weabooo (talk) 16:19, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. I have fixed it. Link20XX (talk) 17:53, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much Weabooo (talk) 17:54, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abuse edit of his picture
Talk:Include guard

message: I don't think any data that is there on wikipedia should be 'moved' to 'Wikibook', instead it could be copied to wikibook or both can refer to same page but no 'MOVING'. 
Not all people (including me) like to read books and I found wikipedia to be a very good reference site, if some pages is moved to wikibooks then one will not be able to find a summary information about the same on wikipedia and searching the page on wikibook is a big constraint (its the search result is similar to Google search and then one have to open all links and see which one have better summary and thus defeats the main attaraction of wikipedia)
XWraithanX: Another reason why this shouldn't be moved to the 'Wikibook' is due to the fact that other languages besides C need to have include guards also.
It doesn't belong in the C programming Wikibook because it is not a topic isolated only to C.  Other languages implement #include guards (or similar). Cinder6 23:47, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm not convinced that this quote from the article is true.
Section 17.4.3.1.2 "Global names", of the C++ standard reads,
where the 165 footnote reads
I'm not an expert programmer so I could be wrong here. I'm not 100% sure what the standard is saying here but it appears that article statement is either too strong or too weak but not correct as presently worded. It's possible that the wording of the standard implies that an underscore followed by a capital letter is not allowed for tokens but I don't see it. Jason Quinn (talk) 22:58, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allowed names for #ifndef tokens 

message: 12:51, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article belongs in a tutorial, not in an encyclopedia 

message: I don't think, the reference in the first § to a file being idempotent helps. I know what is meant but it is formally simple not meaningful. How can a file be idempotent? What is the algebraic structure? And what's more, the file could include different things depending on the context (programming language are highly "non-commutative"...)
Xlae (talk) 06:05, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "idempotence" of a file
Talk:German Communist Party

message: Just interested in knowing what this party's stance on the Red Army Faction during the Cold War was.If anyone knows could they add it.Dermo69
:No idea what the official stance of the DKP on RAF terrorism was. In general, the DKP has always participated in elections and argued in favour of coalitions with non-communist leftist parties, as was the general course of Moscow-backed communist parties in the West. I don't know if this is really relevant for the article. Can't cite any sources anyway. --84.58.216.182 00:46, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Red Army Faction
Talk:Paisius of Hilendar

message: I have included the full text of Paisius' history. Unfortunately I could not find it in English. I apologise to any Bulgarian friend if there are mistakes. Since I do not speak Bulgarian, I also asked a Bulgarian academic to highlight any text that could be seen as referring to the culturally and religiously Greek environment from within which Paisius was identifying a specific Bulgarian trend. By 'Greek', I do not mean ethnicity. I hope Bulgarians or Slavicists may be able to expand the main article and explain in more detail the importance of this 'father of modern Bulgaria'. Politis 12:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Content has been moved to wikisource. --Kslotte (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Understanding Paisius

message: The introduction of "Slavono-Bulgarian history", quoted currently in the article, is wrong. It should be in singular person as it is addressed personally to Eugenios Voulgaris, not to all Bulgarians. In modern times, the appeal is indeed interpreted like being addressed to all Bulgarians, but this is just an interpretation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.0.101.43 (talk) 17:35, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong translation of the introduction to "Slavono-Bulgarian history"
Talk:Agostino Barbarigo

message: If Agostino Barbarigo died in 1501, how could he have fought at Lepanto in 1571? 202.175.228.65 12:21, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That´s a good question. There is the same mistake on the italian pages it:Battaglia_di_Lepanto,_ordine_di_battaglia#Ala_sinistra. It seems it has been an other Agostino. -- 87.162.177.230 11:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This portrait is not mentioned in the Cambridge Guide to Giovanni Bellini and does not look to me like his work. More information is needed to support this or it should be removed.
Waysider1925 (talk) 12:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Further investigation indicates that this portrait (at Budapest) is now attributed to Marco Basaiti, but still as a portrait of Doge Agostino Barbarigo. I am looking for more information before amending the caption.
Waysider1925 (talk) 15:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: After looking at all the books on Giovanni Bellini which I could find there was not one which included this portrait as his work.  Bernard Berenson attributed it to Marco Basaiti but I cannot find that the Fine Arts Museum in Budapest now accepts that attribution. I have altered the caption.
Waysider1925 (talk) 16:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait attributed to Giovanni Bellini
Template talk:IBM

message: I made some changes to the template to improve its validity, brevity, and utility, including reorganizing the rows, replacing the individual names of all CEOs with link to List of IBM CEOs, and removing links to several defunct products, since they are still accessible via WP:CAT. If anyone feels any important links were removed, please feel free to restore, but would request they be added into the new rows instead of reverting all together. Thank you. 2600:1700:1BD0:3FF0:7910:2566:F9D0:B397 (talk) 14:57, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Just now reverted. The massive amount of consolidation understates the breadth of the company's reach, makes for a bunch of inaccuracies (half of those "spinoffs" aren't actually spinoffs in the legal sense) and results in unsightly WP:SEAOFBLUE lists. IBM is a Big company; it's fine if it has a Big (but not too Big, which I don't think it currently is) navbox. DigitalIceAge (talk) 19:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Template update
Talk:Dutch comics

message: This article needs some images. Shinobu (talk) 16:47, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image request

message: What does the term "oblong books" refer to? Pamphlets with a strip per page, akin to Chick tracts? 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 01:20, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Oblong books
Talk:Air traffic flow management

message: Good article.BaseTurnComplete 12:27, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Would "Collaborative Decision Making" add too much detail? Quarkzone 20:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest creating a seperate article for CDM. Adding it here might just confuse or overwhelm someone who has little knowledge of aviation. -- Rpvdk 12:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaborative Decision Making 
Talk:Battle of Lemnos (1913)

message: I think crushing victory is a little overstated.  In fact, no Turkish ship was sunk, and while they did not sortie again in that war, a crushing victory in my view would require a majority of ships to be disabled if not captured or sunk.  Accordingly, unless someone disagrees, I will revert the last edit tomorrow.Argos'Dad 17:53, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Crushing vs. decisive victory

message: Wasn't Barbarossa a privateer rather than a pirate? He sailed under the Turkish equivalent of a letter of marque, rather than plundering indescriminately as a pirate would. Antidespotic 18:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barbarossa 

message: The turkish casualties as in the table are fewer than the ones mentioned in the text if added. (190 in the table and 320 in the text)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xristar (talk • contribs) 20:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkish casualties 

message: *"Naval Battle of Lemnos" -Llc 8
*"Battle of Lemnos" -Naval 22
*1913 "Battle of Lemnos" -Llc 13
Other battles of Lemnos:
*73 BC "Battle of Lemnos"
*"Battle of Lemnos": The Byzantine Navy crushed the power of Moslem pirate Leo of Tripoli.
*Dmitry Senyavin's "Battle of Lemnos" (Battle of Athos)
Takabeg (talk) 06:22, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: This Naval engagement assured Greek domination of the Aegean sea during the war, it has been noted that the actions of the Greek fleet were a decisive factor to the success of the Balkan league, by cutting off essential Ottoman supplies and 200,000+ reinforcements who ended up being stuck in Asia 
I will change it if there are no objections SJCAmerican (talk) 16:17, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This should be a decisive victory
Talk:Battle of Elli

message: The photograph shown needs a source. Never mind copyright, how do we know that this is indeed a ship that took part in the battle?   Andreas   (T) 16:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The painting is the "Battle of Elli" (1913) by Vassileios Chatzis, from the Naval Museum of Greece, in Piraeus. Chatzis died in 1915, and the painting is in public display in a museum, hence in the public domain. I am adding the relevant information to the image summary. Cplakidas 16:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for sourcing it! It is a nice painting reflecting the battle.Argos'Dad 20:56, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of image 

message: Wanting to distinguish between "battleship", "pre-draughtnaught battleship" and "ironclad" (also called "ironclad battleship") as these differences matter. There's quite a difference between a turret ship built in 1870, a battleship built in 1890, and the 'USS Iowa, and using the same term doesn't help the reader visualize what we're dealing with here.
  
At the Battle of Lemnos, the Turks had (according to that article) 3 capital ships:
*Ottoman battleship Barbaros Hayreddin, a pre-dreadnaught
*Ottoman battleship Turgut Reis, a pre-dreadnaught
*Ottoman ironclad Mesudiye, an ironclad, or ironclad batteship if you prefer  
 
At this article (Battle of Elli), the infobox says 3 "battleships" and 1 "ironclad", thus one additional capital ship. They are:
*Barbaros Hayreddin
*Turgut Reis]
*Mesudiye
*????
What's the fourth ship? Are the infobox's three battlships the Barbaros Hayreddin, Turgut Reis, and Mesudiye, with a forth ship being the "ironclad"? Or are two of the battleships being Barbaros Hayreddin and Turgut Reis, the Mesudiye being the ironclad, and the Turks having an additional pre-dreadnaught battleship? I can't correct the infobox until I find this out. Herostratus (talk) 18:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkish order of battle
Talk:Battle of Sarantaporo

message: Are the dates Gregorian or Julian?  This page shows Montenegro declaring war on September 25, but elsewhere in Wikipedia, it's October 8th.  On the First Balkan War page, the list of battles shows Battle of Sarantaporo occurring on October 22, not October 9 -10.  Jtyroler (talk) 01:22, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: Battle of Sarantaporo isn't Commom use in English language.
*Battle of Sarandaporon
**Walter Harrington Crawfurd Price, The Balkan Cockpit - The Political and Military Story of the Balkan Wars in Macedonia, Read Books, 2008, , p. 58.
**Demetrius John Cassavetti, Hellas and the Balkan wars, T. F. Unwin, 1914, p. 96, 164.
*Battle of Sarantaporon
**William Miller, Essays on the Latin Orient, AMS Press, 1983, , p. 270.
**Lowell Clucas, The Byzantine legacy in Eastern Europe, East European Monographs, 1988, , p. 267.
*Battle of Sarantaporo
**Ioannis Metaxas: the formative years 1871-1922, Bibliopolis, 2000,.,. p. 77, 95.
Takabeg (talk) 10:39, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: For heaven's sake, these are just different ways to transliterate the same name, Σαραντάπορο(ν). You are raising noise for a pedantic non-issue here. Constantine   ✍  14:09, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle of Sarantaporo isn't Commom use
Talk:Battle of Yenidje

message: *Battle of Yenije 3 hits
*Battle of Yenice 2 hits
*Battle of Yenidze 1 hit
*Battle of Giannitsa 2 hits (7-4-1)
Takabeg (talk) 05:17, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: B class. Please fix the following. Thanks. In the last paragraph under Prelude, there is a clause that I can't understand: "while the circumvented the city further to west 6th Division". Djmaschek (talk) 22:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: B class review

message: Hello. Despite no sources have been shown for the claim of Greeks being the majority within the city, when Ottoman censuses have clearly shown the city was very multiethnic with Jews as a plurality, not to mention a source I have provided with links on the website directing to claims accurately displaying the data from the Ottoman census of 1912. Any reason for the reversion of my edit?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.187.228.70 (talk) 14:11, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics of Thessaloniki
Talk:Battle of Kirk Kilisse

message: I would like to point out that this article is incomplete because no sources or references to the second battle of kirk kilisse (see wikipedia Italian all'omonima voice), which was, at least in my opinion, much more decisive in the first and it seems to me just write something about this battle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.11.106.46 (talk) 17:47, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 2nd Battle of Kirk Kilisse 

message: *Battle of Kirk Kilisse 90 hits
*Battle of Lozengrad 8 hits
*Battle of Kirkkilise 1 hit
*Battle of Kırklareli 1 hit
Takabeg (talk) 16:42, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming
Talk:List of Alabama railroads

message: The following railroads have operated in the State of Alabama.
Yes, the past perfect tense describes things of the past that extend into the present.
Using the present tense does not cover the antique railroads that operated in Alabama many years ago, and those are listed here, too.98.67.166.209 (talk) 21:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The following railroads have operated in the State of Alabama. 

message: AMTRAK in all capitals has always been the official name of that company and its registered trademark. Whoever wrote "Amtrak" the first time in the Wikipedia made a BIG mistake that needs to be stamped out. Yes, there is precident for this in the names and trademarks of companies like AT&T, FRISCO, and IBM. All you needed to do was to look at all of the railroad box cars with FRISCO painted on their outsides. 98.67.166.209 (talk) 21:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official names and trademarks 
Talk:Columnist

message: how much do advice columnist get payed?
*This is not a forum for this type of question. It is also a difficult question to answer. Alan Liefting 23:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: When did text start being formatted in columns?  Who did it and what was their motivation?
Crasshopper 14:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  invention of columns as a text format 

message: The current page for Columnist is more a list than anything else; it might be more appropriate to move it to "List of columnists" or a similar title. --Aarktica 14:49, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally concur with this sentiment. HuskyHuskie (talk) 17:24, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree somewhat; move the list of notable columnists to "List of notable columnists", and leave the article with a stub-tag in my opinion. I think there's a decent article on this subject waiting to be written. I DO agree that the list of columnists taking up most of the space is kind of silly. CredoFromStart  talk 17:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a reasonable compromise. After you, M. Foi. HuskyHuskie (talk) 19:03, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - CredoFromStart  talk 13:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-article 