Talk:Ian Kerner

message: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-yvonne-k-fulbright/the-need-to-question-supp_b_860378.html Tgeorgescu (talk) 10:25, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a reliable source? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ian Kerner. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170424175932/http://jettandjahn.com/2013/04/cosmopolitan-magazine-how-modern-feminism-controls-men/ to http://jettandjahn.com/2013/04/cosmopolitan-magazine-how-modern-feminism-controls-men/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I added Template:Advert for now. Especially the "Career" section reads biased and not written in a neutral manner (WP:NPOV) with recent edits. --Phiarc (talk) 19:33, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Phiarc, as you may have seen, Bishonen and Rich Farmbrough cleaned up some of the article. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 18:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parts of the article are written like an advertisment 

message: Ian Kerner has spoken in favour of cuckoldry. Should this information be present in the article? --2001:8003:5448:9700:21A9:7151:A1A1:F211 (talk) 02:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: yes. --1.136.105.177 (talk) 07:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's absurdly undue, and adding it in a separate section is especially ridiculous. If it's re-added I'll semiprotect the article. Bishonen | talk 07:57, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add it to the career section since it doesn't deserve its own section. --1.136.105.177 (talk) 10:02, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It remains absurdly undue, and certainly ridiculous where you put it too; the "own section" wasn't my main point. Semiprotected. Bishonen | talk 10:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Please use colons to indent. Due and relevant as Kerner's only single specific opinion mentioned in the article, tagged on to a three-andf-a-half-line concise summary of his career, is it? 1.136.105.177, 1.136.104.173, etc, do you realize that if you had created an account, instead of using dynamic IPs, you'd be blocked for disruptive editing and edit warring by now? Oh, wait, I guess you do realize it. Carry on. Bishonen | talk 12:38, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Do you think if 2604:2000:EF16:9100:78F5:84A9:EFB1:73BC and 2604:2000:EF16:9100:C1CF:878F:8FE4:8947 and so on would be banned for vandalism if they had made an account? Carry on. --1.136.105.164 (talk) 21:09, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

text: I agree with Bishonen. We might need to take this to the WP:BLP noticeboard. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 21:32, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ian Kerner and cuckoldry 

message: I don't think this is notable enough, we don't need an article about a random person. Allaoii talk 22:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we really need this?