Template talk:Importance section

message: I merged in Template:Relevance (which really should have been Template:Relevance-sect which now also redirects here), since it served the same purpose, used the wrong message box type, was poorly worded, was undocumented, etc., etc. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 23:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, Template:Relevance-sect should redirect here and  Template:Relevance should redirect to  Template:Importance. Please see my proposal at Template talk:Relevance --Waldir talk 15:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: :(This discussion has been copied from Template_talk:Importance-s, now that Importance-s redirects to Importance-sect --Ronz (talk) 17:03, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've learned that it's this way for historical reasons and that it needs updating to be in line with current policies and guidelines.  NOR, SOURCE, and WEIGHT seem to apply.  NOT as well.  Others? --Ronz 23:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: But isn't importance completely difference than WP:N?

message: I'd like to thank the editors who have helped improve this template. I created it to fill a void and with your contributions it now both looks solid and slick. Miqademus 14:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks 

message: I changed the wording from
This section may contain information of unclear or questionable importance or relevance to the article's subject matter.
to
This section contains information which may be of unclear or questionable importance or relevance to the article's subject matter.
Moving the 'may' reads better to me, as the section certainly does contain information - it's the importance that's debatable. ~ mazca talk 12:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slight re-word 

message: This template, along with its documentation should be moved over the redirect Template:Importance-section, so that this template's name is consistent with the other X-section templates (e.g. , , etc.). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blooper4912 (talk • contribs) 
:I have deleted all but one revision of Template:Importance-section so you can make the move yourself. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! I have moved the page. --Blooper (Talk) 17:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to {{tl|Importance-section}} 

message: Could it be possible to make this template into a smaller size, or at least allow for a "small" option, similar to for example ? These templates are often just to big to be used in small sections. Thanks, 05:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I tried to change this template to use the smaller ambox in the past, but gave up because I wasn't able to condense the text enough. Also, I think that it should always be small, not optional. --Blooper (Talk) 21:38, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small option? 

message: Change to redirected, anchoring is valid. --5.43.73.144 (talk) 19:12, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: pseudo-redirected | correcting and detailing proposal for fixing issue

message: It is used in article Diluent.  doesn't contain it in order for displaying text of reason stated for disputing relevance of section. --5.43.73.144 (talk) 19:16, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Parameter 1 for reason