Talk:Emory University/Archive 1

message: Chicken Soda - a while back, I attempted to ask you what are your references for the inserts you keep doing for Emory University, such as:
>>Emory has an unusual student culture in that by most >>measures, the administration is far more progressive than the student body.
>>Emory's student culture is very conservative.
I didn't ever find a reply. Please note that I am at and have been with Emory for several years now in different capacities, and I find your statement a dubious opinion at best... no doubt what you write may apply to some of Emory's students, but not the majority and certainly not the entire student culture. If you have a verifiable source, then it could be considered. Wiki4fun 00:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, Chickensoda -- are you angry much? If you read the heading of this topic, it says BOTH sides need to be fair and balanced. Then if you check the history of the Emory University article, I removed not only your comments, but equally comments that went to far as promotional, pro-Emory advertising. Dude, calm down, and recognize that when I ask you to be balanced, I'm also asking the other side to be balanced too. Check my edits, you'll see I removed their pieces too. Wiki4fun 16:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Again, see above Chickensoda. Paranoid much? Why would I also remove pro-Emory advertising if I was with an Emory office? To answer you: I'm not. I work full-time with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and am a current part-time PhD student at Emory who previously attended as a college student. I live 5 minutes from Emory's campus at the moment and divide my time between CDC and Emory equally. Feel better? Wiki4fun 16:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm combatting people who try to distort this article to be either anti-Emory or pro-Emory either way. It's an encyclopedia after all. It should be balanced and fair on BOTH sides (again, see the header here) and you've clearly gone off the deep end. I was there as an undegrad from 1996-2000, and I knew several motivated and altruistic individuals. You must just have never connected with them. There was Alpha Phi Omega, the co-ed service group, which numbered about 120 active members at any given time, and then there was Volunteer Emory which included another 150 members. Maybe you're a bit self-obsessed with your view of Emory as being the only reality out there. Chill man. Let your axe go. Wiki4fun 16:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Here's where I agree with you... and if you'll see the edits under Wiki4fun, they're striving not to be pro- or anti- anything, just the facts. Wiki4fun 16:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Chicken -- I've been at Emory from 1996-2000. Then again as a PhD student in the last two years. I know its culture and I'm not saying that your perceptions aren't among some of the students there, but they are *not* representative of the student body as a whole and because you pick isolated bits of info and present them without a broader context, they're not proper for an encyclopedia article. Emory does have an active group of students who do volunteer and work with the community... about 300-400 odd members. I also did not come from a rich family (blue collar background) and was only able to attend Emory because of financial aid + scholarship. I recommend that if you have such an axe to grind against Emory, create a blog and you can *freely* write whatever you want on it. This is Wikipedia -- the Free Encyclopedia. Which means verifiable facts, not perceptions of reality. Understand the difference? Wiki4fun 16:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The importance of being fair and balanced on BOTH sides 

message: entire website only serves as a guide for people working within Emory on how to properly use Emory's symbols in publications. Because we have a valid fair-use tag for the images already, I think it may be best if we remove the added text which is a little confusing unless you have been given permission. Respond to me on either my talk page or here before any changes are made. Again, thanks for helping out with the article so much. Nrbelex (talk) 16:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideas for Additions or Improvements 

message: Is this logo copyrighted? -- Zoe
:Probably. But it probably also is being used under fair use. --mav
Would anyone else like to see this article conform to the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Universities proposal for formatting?  Right now, this article is well-written with good info, but it's tough to navigate. Formatting would require some major editing and moving paragraphs around, but I think it would be worth it.
--User:Sayeth May 9, 2004
:It's now using this template 68.211.149.176 15:00, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting 

message: According to this page, the seal listed here is not the Emory seal. In fact, it is explicitly stated that it is the President's seal and "was designed specifically for use by the Office of the President and appears only on documents and ceremonial materials produced by that office." Unfortunately, the correct one on that site is of low quality. Any suggestions? Nrbelex (talk) 07:10, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and uploaded it. It doesn't look very good but it is the right seal. Nrbelex (talk) 22:32, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emory Seal 

message: During Dooley’s Week, if Dooley (a skeleton character that serves as Emory’s other mascot) and his entourage come into your class and spray your teacher with a water gun, that class is dismissed.
:While this is true, when I attended 10+ years ago, this practice was somewhat contested. Some classes, particularly the intensive science courses like Organic Chem, did not want to be dismissed - especially when exams or in-class tests were approaching. I believe that "Dooley" now checks with professors ahead of time before dismissing their class. 209.214.230.142 18:08, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dooley's Week 

message: In the past few days I've seen a number of changes to the Emory picture in the infobox. It started as :Image:Emory.jpeg, became :Image:Emory Crest.gif and is now :Image:Emory Shield.gif. If you follow the WikiProject Universities template, a "seal" with the school's motto and year of creation should be displayed. This can be seen at the University of Michigan page which is featured. However Emory lacks this type of seal and the closest thing to is :Image:Emory Crest.gif. This type of image can be seen at places like Harvard University and Duke University. I think before the picture is changed again, we should come to a consensus here as to what should be displayed. Nrbelex (talk) 17:43, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To whomever changed the image again... please stop. :Image:Emory Crest.gif is the most similar to all the other school's symbols in their infoboxes as it includes the school's latin phrase and the school's "coat of arms". Nrbelex (talk) 02:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nrbelex, I completely agree with you.  You thought I changed it from the crest back to the shield, but in fact, I was replacing the shield with the crest.  The reason people are not allowing the crest to be used, even though it is quite akin to what other schools use and is Emory's official university crest, is that it violates Emory's web identity rules (found at http://identity.emory.edu).  Again, I think the crest should be used (it looks much cooler and has the latin motto), and have tried replacing the shield with it, but somebody with an Emory IP keeps replacing it (repeatedly) ... so I have just given up. 170.140.70.254
On second thought, :Image:Emory Seal.gif is the most appropriate for the infobox but given our current copy's quality, I think we're better off with what there is now. Can any of the contributors (especially those on the campus - I know there are some of you) think of a way to get Emory to release a higher resolution image of the seal for use here? If given permission and a higher quality image, we could post it with Template:withpermission combined with a fair use rationale. Perhaps somebody could inform the Emory Identity staff that most of Emory's competitors have higher quality images on their pages compared with Emory's...? Nrbelex (talk) 00:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

text: The problem is, there is a blanket statement on use of the seal and similar items: "The President's seal (A) was designed specifially for use by the Office of the President and appears only on documents and ceremonial materials produced by that office. The University crest (C) is used for special commemorative applications only. The use of these two graphics, as well as the University seal (B) is restricted and must be approved by the Secretary of the University or the Office of the President." The way I read it, I don't even think we can claim fair use on the crest, especially since there is a preferred identifying logo that Emory would rather have on the article. —C.Fred (talk) 04:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Also, I have to concur with those who oppose using the crest. Despite being an inmate here for 7 years, I've never seen it... anywhere except on the identity project website. Every official publication and website is marked with the shield logo. —ptk✰fgs 02:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image for infobox 

message: I recently reverted a user's edits on this page  because I had believed they were vandalous edits. In retrospect, I now see these edits as unverifiable and without reliable sources (as well as unexplained content removals). If someone can provide the correct information that shows that I was wrong in reverting the edits, then by all means add the information back. However, the statement about the alcohol poisoning and the "top party school" feels unencyclopedic and not necessary for inclusion in the article (as it is merely a single incident relating to the paragraph). Ryūlóng 04:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I apologize for my edit. I reverted because of vandalism made to this page, and I checked the user's contributions in the article. I will reintroduce the information. Ryūlóng 05:24, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Per my recent edit 

message: I'm not sure if there are any clear criteria as to what defines "notable" for either faculty or alumni. There does seem to be some back-and-forth about folks being added or removed. I think if folks decide to remove, they should post their reasons why. If folks decide to add someone, the reason should be clear either in the general news, via Google, via their Wikipedia entry, or via some URL that the contributor provides to make this contribution self-evident. 
Thoughts? My primary concern is not having vandalism of this page, while at the same time avoid vanity additions as well. Wiki4fun 03:40, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not particularly committed to keeping or removing any one entry in the list. I would say, however, that the lists are getting quite long. I think we should either pare them down, or do as you suggested and move them to a new article. —ptk✰fgs 16:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I concur with ptk and 170.140.134.126. I like the middle-ground solution. I'm sure we don't have all the famous Emory faculty and alumni here, only those who either (1) historians put them on, (2) they put themselves on, (3) friends put them on (or enemies took them off). I think Harvard has the right approach to separate the Emory University entry from the Emory faculty + alumni entry. Who wants to move them? I'm not a Wikipedia expert but could (ptk seems more skilled...) Wiki4fun 16:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defining Notable Faculty and Alumni 

message: Simply that, any suggestions on a rule for "clearing out" old discussions? I'm wondering if some of the early discussions are still relevant, yet I don't want to incur vandalism flames if I delete them. Thoughts anyone? Wiki4fun 04:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We archive old discussions. I have archived the old discussions. —ptk✰fgs 03:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you ptk, merci beaucoup! Wiki4fun 03:03, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you for archiving the old threads out. Yesterday, the threads were deleted but not archived, and that's why I restored them. Since there is now an archive page for them, they can be deleted from this page. —C.Fred (talk) 01:15, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This talk page is getting long, what's the rule for "clearing out" old discussions? 

message: Do we need this yet? While I would say the Wheel normally meets WP:RS, in this case they're citing an anonymous source. —ptk✰fgs 16:08, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this better? Nrbelex (talk) 17:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Much better. —ptk✰fgs 18:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salman Rushdie 

message: Can someone help out by adding high quality photographs of the campus to this article? Photographs pertaining to Emory history would be useful as well. Thanks.  Majoreditor 11:57, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All of my Emory photos on Flickr are under an Attribution-ShareAlike license so they are usable... but most aren't really appropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think any will work, send me a message and I'll upload them. Nrbelex (talk) 05:42, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Needs More Photographs

message: :Image:Emory Eagle.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Emory Eagle.gif

message: Disavian tagged the athletics section as a possible spinnoff to a new article. Your thoughts?
IMO, it's a worthwhile goal. However, I don't think there's currently enough material to justify creation of a new article. If, however, someone want to expand the section then I would consider supporting a spinoff.  Majoreditor 21:10, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not enough to make an article of any real value, imho... Nrbelex (talk) 18:52, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Not enough to support an article. Not for the forseeable decade, even. —ptk✰fgs 10:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of new article on Emory Eagles (athletics) 

message: It's been suggested that the article doesn't need an entire section for the Emory Alumni Association. 
A quick check of other university articles reveals that most don't have a section on alumni orgnizations. 
The current section is of questionable encyclopedic value. I'd suggest deleting it.  Thoughts/comments? Majoreditor 01:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm strongly in favor of its complete deletion. Nrbelex (talk) 02:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Boosterism isn't appropriate. Majoreditor (talk) 15:41, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Emory Alumni Association section

message: I sought a third opinion on whether to include the Sigma Nu championship . The editor agrees that it doesn't belong in the article. The material is un-encyclopedic boosterism and trivia. Majoreditor (talk) 13:58, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Related along the same lines, the Notable faculty referenced with Emory -- some make perfect sense to include there, whereas other perhaps should be moved to List of persons associated with Emory University, thoughts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.219.74.36 (talk) 02:52, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Boosterism

message: Why isn't there any separate article on Dooley?  There are so many things about him, so many rumors. Lskatz (talk) 17:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You answered half the question: if a lot of it is rumours, then there isn't much left to build a factual article on. —C.Fred (talk) 17:25, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Somebody could do us a great favor by creating an article on Dooley. Majoreditor (talk) 01:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dooley 

message: Why was the section on the Valdosta Junior College campus deleted? It is historically factual and interesting.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.99.69.204 (talk) 06:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Valdosta Junior College Deleted?

message: 4/26/09 Responding to query regarding reference for Eliza T. Dresang in Notable Alumni section. There are now two references for this.  One from the Florida State University website where she taught and conducted research for several years, and the other from an ALA article on the award given to Dresang.  Thesea references are now included in the wiki article on Dresang that is under construction. --JourneyWomanSLP (talk) 15:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that Dresang is not nearly of the notability level of the notable faculty. She should not be on the shortlist of notable persons mentioned in this article. However, once her article is created, I don't see a problem listing her at List of persons associated with Emory University. —C.Fred (talk) 16:56, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable alumni and Eliza Dresang

message: Jag Sheth appears to be the only one in the "notable faculty" shortlist here for whom there is no assertion of notability independent of his activity as a professor. This list is going to grow very, very long again if we set the bar at "one of the most notable professors in field XYZ". In the absence of an independent claim of notability, we should leave him for the longer list. —ptk✰fgs 22:30, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the article needn't be junked up with lengthy lists. I just now stumbled across the link you mentioned, which is at the bottom of the article. I'd suggest promoting the link the way  Washington University does. Also, one would expect to find Nobel winner Wole Soyinka on the Emory faculty list. I suppose I shall add him. Majoreditor 00:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's right there at the top of the "Notable faculty" section here. That's what the manual of style recommends. —ptk✰fgs 00:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jag Sheth 

message: I would like to update the Athletics portion of the page in order to:
# Expand on intramurals and draw a better distinction between them and club sports (which are also very popular at Emory)
# Add more updated information pertaining to recent victories at the varsity level
# Dedicate a sub-section to “sports and scholarship,” which would illustrate the intersection between academics and athletics at Emory and show how the University puts emphasis on both – for example, Emory has the second-highest NCAA Postgraduate Scholarship winners since 2000 of any school in the U.S. 
I’m open to suggestions on this and would appreciate any feedback that other editors could provide before I make these changes. Akvwiki (talk) 14:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits to be made to Athletics section

message: Emory University was not chartered until 1915. Almost all of the current 'history' section is occupied with the period before the college's move. The 'history' section should reflect the more recent period of the universities existence after its founding in Druid Hills(with a brief introduction to the college's earlier history). The more expansive discussions now under this topic should transferred to a section specifically concerned with the history of Emory College. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RrML (talk • contribs) 02:45, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emory History Section? 

message: In some other editing, I came across this org and went ahead and made a stub for them. I'm not sure where to link it from the main Emory article, though: Lillian Carter Center for International Nursing. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 19:54, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Emory-related article 

message: Most other college mascots have articles; perhaps Dooley (mascot) should as well? —Disavian (talk/contribs) 00:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I may get around to writing an article on Dooley sometime in the next year. Majoreditor (talk) 03:00, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good enough :) —Disavian (talk/contribs) 15:28, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dooley 

message: Does anyone know if Swoops Revenge is a real secret society at Emory?  I noticed an IP address added to the article.  --Jerm  (Talk/ Contrib) 18:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds dubious.  If it's real then it's new. Majoreditor 21:02, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I find the last 3 secret societies dubious (Ducemus, Speculum, and the Order of Ammon).  The link given does not list specific secret societies.  I can't edit it though, because I'm an Emory student and our incredulity about the existence of some of these (specifically speculum) is kind of common here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iank125 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Secret Societies

message: I removed the addition of the score scandal and another editor reverted me. Let's talk. 
While I completely agree that this is a notable event and is very clearly covered by secondary reliable sources, I feel to make it a fourth of the entire lede would give the event undue weight. I'm open to a compromise that has a shorter description in the first few paragraphs, but the amount currently inserted is too much. --Lord Roem ~ (talk) 22:33, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't belong in the lead as it's not essential to helping a reader understand the university. ElKevbo (talk) 22:48, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I have removed it from the lead per WP:LEAD and WP:UNDUE and because it seems like a flash in the pan event. However, I've kept information about the scandal in the appropriate section in the body of the article.  Majoreditor (talk) 01:25, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scores scandal 

message: Did I miss it, or was there no listing for Ely R. Callaway. Jr. in the Notable Alumni? How could you omit Mr. Callaway, if he is, in fact, an Emory alumnus?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allred E. Gnuthat (talk • contribs) 02:48, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Look here. It is a list of notable alumni/faculty of Emory University. He is listed under the "Business" section, which is where I linked. CorkythehornetfanTalk 07:52, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Ely Callaway in the Notable Alumni section? 

message: I am an alumni who with other students have attempted to make the emory university page more presetable and organized. SOme people keep reverts to an older and unorganized version, with some of the reasoning being from accdoing to editing summaries, rascist implications. Please stop reverting to the older template and if you wish toad or update information please feel free to do so without messing with the current template.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superdude112 (talk • contribs) 05:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emory University Page Issues 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Emory University's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "nris":
From Louisburg College: 
From Oklahoma City University: 
From Syracuse University: 
From National Register of Historic Places: 
From Boston College:  Reference#: 90000109
From Southern Bell Telephone Company Building: 
From Randolph–Macon College: 
From Briarcliff (mansion): 
From Rhodes-Haverty Building: 
From Herndon Home: 
From Flatiron Building (Atlanta): 
From Atlanta City Hall: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:24, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Emory University]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Emory University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091216212534/http://www.gbhem.org:80/site/c.lsKSL3POLvF/b.5392245/k.60B4/Schools_by_Jurisdiction.htm to http://www.gbhem.org/site/c.lsKSL3POLvF/b.5392245/k.60B4/Schools_by_Jurisdiction.htm#S.Eastern
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140215010040/http://communications.emory.edu:80/brand_licensing/IdentityGuidelines/IdentityColor.html to http://communications.emory.edu/brand_licensing/IdentityGuidelines/IdentityColor.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111125052439/http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/MapItDrawServlet?geo_id=16000US1324264&_bucket_id=50&tree_id=420&context=saff&_lang=en&_sse=on to http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/MapItDrawServlet?geo_id=16000US1324264&_bucket_id=50&tree_id=420&context=saff&_lang=en&_sse=on
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131030174205/http://emoryhistory.emory.edu/history/index.html to http://emoryhistory.emory.edu/history/index.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110826065630/http://college.emory.edu:80/home/academic/program/major/engineering.html to http://college.emory.edu/home/academic/program/major/engineering.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150109171548/http://www.nursing.emory.edu/academics/index.html to http://www.nursing.emory.edu/academics/index.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110710191242/http://emorywheel.com/detail.php?n=26298 to http://emorywheel.com/detail.php?n=26298
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100727194639/http://creativity.emory.edu:80/student-art-groups.shtml to http://www.creativity.emory.edu/student-art-groups.shtml
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100610081757/http://www.creativity.emory.edu/creativity-conversations-index.shtml to http://creativity.emory.edu/creativity-conversations-index.shtml
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110709193437/http://www.emory.edu:80/home/life/athletics/scholar-athletes.html to http://www.emory.edu/home/life/athletics/scholar-athletes.html
*Added archive //web.archive.org/web/20120119194001/http://emorywheel.com/detail.php?n=26552 to http://emorywheel.com/detail.php?n=26552
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111029040933/http://www.alumni.emory.edu:80/volunteer-and-give/emory-cares.html to http://www.alumni.emory.edu/volunteer-and-give/emory-cares.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110711053816/http://www.rec.emory.edu:80/rec/intramurals/ to http://www.rec.emory.edu/rec/intramurals/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110718173952/http://www.students.emory.edu/OEO/ to http://www.students.emory.edu/OEO/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090508103008/http://www.students.emory.edu:80/SGA/sga/ to http://www.students.emory.edu/SGA/sga/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150804015135/http://www.aas.emory.edu:80/core/mccall.html to http://www.aas.emory.edu/core/mccall.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: A recent update about safe spaces at Emory by another user was reverted for being "unsourced and non-encyclopedic". Obviously unsourced is an issue but what does "non-encyclopedic" mean in the context of safe spaces? I am a new user; are safe spaces considered non-encyclopedic across university pages on Wikipedia? CTKE15 (talk) 02:04, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safe Spaces Non-encyclopedic 

message: The 15:16, 5 October 2016‎ Contributor321 version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to expand an existing article.--Wing (talk) 16:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  translation into Chinese Wikipedia 

message: /.../  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4107:9B00:FD1D:4570:446D:E240 (talk) 12:07, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  add pronunciation characters /.../ 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Emory University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141204023637/http://www.emory.edu/home/about/factsfigures/index.html to http://www.emory.edu/home/about/factsfigures/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141204023637/http://www.emory.edu/home/about/factsfigures/index.html to http://www.emory.edu/home/about/factsfigures/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151109231238/http://www.naicu.edu/member_center/members.asp to http://www.naicu.edu/member_center/members.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110521210513/http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities to http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141204023637/http://www.emory.edu/home/about/factsfigures/index.html to http://www.emory.edu/home/about/factsfigures/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141204023637/http://www.emory.edu/home/about/factsfigures/index.html to http://www.emory.edu/home/about/factsfigures/index.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://emorywheel.com/detail.php?n=26552
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Emory University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150227101242/http://www.asm.gtorg.gatech.edu/event/emory-vaccine-dinner-club-2/ to http://www.asm.gtorg.gatech.edu/event/emory-vaccine-dinner-club-2/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There seems to be an edit war going on at the moment on a claim in the article's lead. I propose that we discuss it here on the talk page.
Cheers, Majoreditor (talk) 22:44, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This is going on across several pages (see UC Berkeley, Columbia, etc.), by the same user (ip). I've reported the user here, please add your comments. UCaetano (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

text: Setting aside the persistent sockpuppetry and edit warring, the material is WP:OR so it has been removed until editors can find sources that explicitly support it.  Collecting together a handful of different rankings to make an argument is textbook synthesis; moreover, if it's so important that it needs to be included in this article and indeed in the lede then surely an editor can find reliable sources that directly state it. ElKevbo (talk) 18:40, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Prestigious University

message: An anon editor took offense to an incorrect statement he added to the article. Emory is not located in "the city of Atlanta." This isn't a subjective matter; Emory's campus is located east of the city limits. The term metropolitan area includes both urban and suburban environments. Some sources refer to Emory as urban; others, such as Emory Clinic, U.S. News and World Report and Emory's Office of Athletics, refer to it as suburban. I'm indifferent to the term as long as the article doesn't make a factual error. I've changed the phrase to "metropolitan Atlanta"; hopefully that will satisfy all.  Majoreditor 14:32, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Location of Emory

message: :: NOTE: This is an outdated section as Emory has been annexed into Atlanta effective January 1, 2018 WhisperToMe (talk) 06:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur with WhisperToMe. Majoreditor (talk) 00:59, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

text: The postal address does not always have anything to do with the location of the destination. (For point of reference, I once had a Falls Church, VA address even though I lived in Fairfax County.) Likewise, while the post office serving Emory calls itself Atlanta, Emory is located in unincorporated DeKalb County. It is not in the portion of Atlanta located in DeKalb. —C.Fred (talk) 12:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: C.Fred is correct. Emory's campus is not within the city limits of Atlanta. Majoreditor (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

text: As a note, the "Druid Hills" referenced in this article is an unincorporated area that is not in the City of Atlanta at all. WhisperToMe (talk) 19:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am getting my information from other Wikipedia articles and maps - but it would appear to me that a section of Atlanta bleeds into DeKalb County, and besides, Druid Hills appears to be a neighborhood of Atlanta much like Midtown or Buckhead. --haha169 (talk) 06:21, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Emory is not within the city of Atlanta; in contrast, Buckhead and Midtown are within the Atlanta city limits. The fact that a small part of Atlanta is in DeKalb county doesn't matter. It can said that Emory is in located in DeKalb County or that it is located in the Greater Atlanta metropolitan area. It is incorrect to state that Emory is located in the city of Atlanta. Majoreditor (talk) 02:47, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: DeKalb

message: * Malakoff D (2019) Emory ousts two Chinese-American researchers after investigation into foreign ties ; May. 23, 
* Jon Cohen (2019) Terminated Emory researcher disputes university’s allegations about China ties, May, 24
--Lamiot (talk) 17:51, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recently in Science magazine 

message: See https://gis.atlantaga.gov/docs/council/councilall.pdf which now shows the university
http://emorywheel.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/Complaint-2.pdf is a document of a related lawsuit
WhisperToMe (talk) 05:19, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emory annexation