lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Organ (music)/Archive 2

message: Given the size of its repertory, the rich history of the instrument, and its powerful social and ideological function in christendom, the article is way too short. It's poorly written and structured. The picture at the top is of poor quality (scanned?). 
It needs a lot of work.
Tony 07:47, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article is '''seriously''' bad
Talk:Korangi Sector 33

message: Someone shall surely come forward to add few more words to the stub. Thanks. --Bhadani 15:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Keamari (locality)

message: Someone shall surely come forward to add few more words to the stub. Thanks. --Bhadani 15:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Korangi

message: Someone shall surely come forward to add few more words to the stub. Thanks. --Bhadani 15:23, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rehri

message: plz expand. --Bhadani 15:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  TreyGeek (talk) 15:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Landhi

message: plz expand. --Bhadani 15:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Landhi Colony

message: plz expand. --Bhadani 15:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lyari

message: plz expand. --Bhadani 15:25, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

message: This is one of the biggest slums in the world with over 1,000,000 inhabitants, yet there is so little information available on it in English. Thanks for your attention. 75.95.245.49 (talk) 07:26, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for expansion 

message: abdn 103.18.12.158 (talk) 14:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  lyari
Talk:Machar Colony

message: Please add few more paragraphs, and at least a picture shall be a fine addition. --Bhadani 15:26, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Madina Colony, Orangi Town

message: Please add few more paragraphs, and at least a picture shall be a fine addition. --Bhadani 15:26, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mahmudabad, Karachi

message: Please add few more paragraphs, and at least a picture shall be a fine addition. --Bhadani 15:26, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  The article was created by a serial copyright violator who has used, among other accounts, User:Siddiqui and User:AlphaGamma1991. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 01:32, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: saptami class ka 7 144.48.133.150 (talk) 15:15, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 0311 7451940 144.48.133.150 (talk) 15:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urdu
Talk:Manora, Karachi

message: Shri Varun Dev Mandir on Manora beach
----
Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Manzoor Colony

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hemolytic disease of the newborn

message: Rh disease is specific for anti D haemolytic disease of the newborn.
Hemolytic disease of the newborn is genernal and could be Rd D C c E e Kell Kid Duffy or ABO incomplatability.
Hemolytic disease of the newborn should link to erythroblastosis fetalis I think.It would be even better if erythroblastosis fetalis was renamed haemolytic disease of the newborn as this is in english and easier for most people to understand.
Please include english and USA spellings.
Snowman 15:28, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  (null header) 

message: Derek Morgan Bush has no notability other than his blood disease issue at birth.  I propose merging that article as a brief blurb into this article. Safiel (talk) 19:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Derek Morgan Bush]] 

message: The brits call this Blue Baby Syndromehttp://www.bbc.co.uk/health/physical_health/pregnancy/pregnancy_rhesus.shtml.
There should at least be a differentiator from the existing Blue Baby Syndrome article, and a mention somewhere at the start of this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.185.136 (talk) 20:18, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  aka Blue Baby
Talk:Maripur

message: I am eagerly awaiting further expansion. --Bhadani 15:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maymarabad

message: I am eagerly awaiting further expansion. --Bhadani 15:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Ragiwara

message: I am eagerly awaiting further expansion. --Bhadani 15:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Millat Nagar

message: I am eagerly awaiting further expansion. --Bhadani 15:31, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mithadar

message: I am eagerly awaiting further expansion. --Bhadani 15:31, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Model Colony, Karachi

message: I am eagerly awaiting further expansion. --Bhadani 15:31, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Moria Khan Goth

message: Good stub with potential for adding further contents. --Bhadani 15:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mohammad Nagar

message: Good stub with potential for adding further contents. --Bhadani 15:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Miguel Littin

message: "He directed the important and influential documentary THE BATTLE OF CHILE"
*I have removed this text from the article; IMDB doesn't list it as one of his movies, unless it's the English name of "Acta General de Chile".
**Update: "The Battle of Chile" was actually directed by Patricio Guzmán.  - Mike Rosoft 15:32, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mominabad

message: Good stub with potential for adding further contents. --Bhadani 15:33, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Muhajir Camp

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:34, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mujahid Colony

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:34, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Text contributed by serial copyright infringer User:Siddiqui, who has also edited as User:AlphaGamma1991, has been removed. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:11, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Mujahidabad

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:34, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Murad Memon Goth

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:34, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:34, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Mustafa Taj Colony

message: something more plz. --Bhadani 15:35, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Muslimabad

message: something more plz. --Bhadani 15:35, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Muslim Mujahid Colony

message: something more plz. --Bhadani 15:36, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Main Page alternatives/(Classic 2006)

message: Is the lack of a header (the "From Wikipedia..." bit) on this page intentional? I ask only because the classic main page always had a header, and it doesn't quite look right without -- Gurch 15:36, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a bug on the horrible hack used by the redesigned Main Page; I've reported it at MediaWiki talk:Monobook.js#Main Page. --cesarb 05:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No header?

message: This page should probably be moved under Wikipedia:Main Page, for example to Wikipedia:Main Page/Classic 2006, because it's currently counted as an article here, yet it's clearly not an article. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 00:35, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's the traditional location for all the alternate Main Pages; see the list at Wikipedia:Main Page alternates for more of them. --cesarb 05:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Only since January 31 2006 ;) . It's not too late for a move if anyone still feels the need to nominate it. --Quiddity 05:19, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

text: See also this rename vote, which complicates things for both. --Quiddity 05:27, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
Talk:Muzafarabad, Karachi

message: Someone shall surely come forward to add few more words to the stub. Thanks. --Bhadani 15:37, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nai Abadi

message: Someone shall surely come forward to add few more words to the stub. Thanks. --Bhadani 15:37, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nanak Wara

message: Someone shall surely come forward to add few more words to the stub. Thanks. --Bhadani 15:37, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Naseerabad, Karachi

message: Someone shall surely come forward to add few more words to the stub. Thanks. --Bhadani 15:37, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nazimabad

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nasir Colony

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Natha Khan Goth

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nawabad

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:North Nazimabad

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Orangi

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs to be updated. Many cited articles are decades old too. 182.185.224.11 (talk) 03:39, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated Content
Talk:HDN

message: All links about haemolytic disease of the newborn should go to its own page which is currently named erythroblastosis fetalis.  Erthroblastosis fetalis is a correct alternative name for HND, but it is in latin and it would be better understood if it was called Heamolytic disease of the newborn.  English and USA spellings to be accounted for.  I think that this confusion is preventing further development in this area of the wiki.  Links and redirects are currently confusing and need attention.Snowman 15:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:P.E.C.H.S Block 2

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:42, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:P.E.C.H.S Block 6

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:42, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As I have already pointed out. Discuss.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.20.29.214 (talk) 18:57, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is not about PECHS, it's about PECHS Block II 
Talk:Pahar Ganj, Karachi

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:42, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Paposh Nagar

message: Please give some more information – a picture shall be an added advantage. --Bhadani 15:43, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbasi_Shaheed. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  TreyGeek (talk) 03:32, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Qaidabad

message: Nice stub – adding a picture shall be fine! --Bhadani 15:45, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NASCAR RaceDay

message: I am not an expert on NASCAR, however, this article has an extreme POV that seems like it came from a website. - Enzo Aquarius 15:46, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Point of view
Talk:Eric IX of Sweden

message: How come the article is named Eric IX of Sweden? Im no expert, but was he really called "IX" during his lifetime? Theres no way that there could have been eight kings named Eric before him, så why the number nine?
According to the namin policy, the name that the person is most known as should be used. In sweden that is "Erik den Helige", but what is it in the rest of the world? I dont know, usually I read swedish history in swedish...
Someone who knows anything about this?
--Screensaver 11:05, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first Eric to use a serial number was Eric XIV. For the rest before him, they were invented later. Eric IX was earlier known just as king Eric. --Drieakko 11:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Note that Eric is not an offical Catholic saint, so calling him saint internationally is somewhat questionable. --Drieakko 11:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The numbering scheme is due to Johannes Magnus, who counted Jordanes' Berig as Eric I. He invented a bunch of kings in his history of Sweden. According the the article Eric in Nordisk Familjebok, he assigned the number IX to Eric the Saint, as is done here too. This scheme was adopted by Eric XIV of Sweden and is still used by Carl XVI Gustav of Sweden. However, for the earlier Erics, enwp is out of step with Johannes Magnus. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: Eric does not fall into category of saints as defined in the respective Saint article in Wikipedia. So I removed the Saint categories from him. --Drieakko 14:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is however regarded as a saint, and the inclusion of that category is the way that the Saints project can keep track of the article. The project has recently expanded its scope to include all those who are commemorated in liturgical calendars, and the article makes it clear that this individual is so commemorated. I have on that basis restored a saints category. The article in question is however being worked on, and I may try to change the category to another later. John Carter 19:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Drieakko: You're dead wrong. Saint Eric of Sweden has an entry in the Roman Martyrology of the Catholic Church, and has an entry in several authoritative collections of Catholic saints' lives, for instance Butler's Lives of the Saints, which is quasi-official. DominvsVobiscvm (talk) 08:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Saint links
Talk:European Union Contest for Young Scientists

message: Is this an EU only competition or Europe-wide? It doesn't seem very clear being called the "European Union Contest for Young Scientists" but has had venues in places outside of the EU (suggesting they also enter). Can someone clear this up? - RHeodt 16:04, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: EU only?

message: This is a big competition, but I would not really feel the winners rate a wikipedia page all for themselves, just for this - but each name is referenced for a page (mostly incorrectly to people of the same name)
Skihatboatbike (talk) 13:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do the winners rate a Wikipedia page?
Talk:Strange Company

message: Yep, the article isn't too long, but I thought it's better to have a quasi-stub than no article at all... Most of the content is reworded from the content of their own website, with lots of the information there excluded... The thing is, I know of the company by internet word-of-mouth and I know it's a really important one, a pioneer in the field... It was kind of a shame for them to be the only ones linked to from the machinima article with no article to call their own...
I hope someone who's more informed, or hopefully one of them, adds to this and expands it - I did all I could trust myself to do for the time being. BunnyDee 16:09, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll see what I can do, but don't hold your breath.--Drat (Talk) 23:29, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know if anybody is still monitoring this page (Drat? TKD?), but I'm happy to expand this page with relevant information  as well as correcting some incorrect and out-of-date info currently on the page. The only thing holding me back is that I actually work for Strange Company (I'm the Head Of Beverage Acquisition And Caffeine Replenishment - see my user page). I would normally assume that this would disqualify me from making any contributions to this page, but since BunnyDee invited us to edit the page, I'm making the offer. I've been watching the page for the past few months in the hope that someone else would step up to the plate, but no cigar. I do have a full disclosure of bias on my user page, which I'm happy to leave there. I'm also happy to write Hugh Hancock if there are plans to expand it to a full page rather than a redirect, although the same bias must obviously apply. He is my boss, after all. I Hate Sheep 17:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So long as you write unbiased, in the third person, and can reference reliable, verifiable sources, there shouldn't be too many problems.--Drat (Talk) 05:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mary Harrison McKee

message: Simply too short.
The Ronin 16:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:System of a Down albums

message: The list may not contains enough elements to be pertinent. Also, the main article System of a Down provides enough information about discography. According to me, this list is not important. Maybe we could create an article about the whole discography of the band who provides more complete information than the band article Frédérick Lacasse 16:16, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Deer Park Monastery

message: This was proposed, and I agree. I believe that the Monastery in WI is more accurately named "Deer Park Buddhist Center and Monastery", so that would be the correct name for their page. I'll try to work on that in the next day or so. It would be great is someone from each of those areas could add more info to each article - they seem like interesting places! Nightngle 02:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've already done it. Just wanted to see if there were objections first :-) A Ramachandran 02:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting page, one for each monastery