lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Francis Edward Peters

message: I have noticed there are pages throughout this site which spell out Peters’ middle name as Edwards instead of Edward. Can somebody possibly confirm whichever is correct, and correct the erroneous instances? Pandeist (talk) 17:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edward, or Edwards?
Talk:Central Illinois Railroad

message: This article needs an infobox. --Anthony5429 12:22, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, added! NatFee (talk) 17:03, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mornington railway station

message: This article and Mornington Tourist railway station, Melbourne contain essentially identical information, so it would seem logical to merge them into one article (which would basically just involve making the paragraph about the tourist station into a separate section here and moving the infobox from that article into the new section). Any objection? Deor (talk) 17:15, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion

message: All of mornington tourist has been erased.
Vandalism?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.149.99.17 (talk) 22:35, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible vandalism?
Talk:Galveston Railroad

message: I added the GWI sale information after researching the history of GVSR 301, which became RLIX 1005, an SW1001 leased to Tesoro's refinery in Salt Lake City, Utah. More information is here: Tesoro's locomotive roster Don Strack (talk) 14:17, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Richmond railway station, Melbourne

message: It would be awesome to update the image in the infobox for the station. The current one was taken in 2008, and the station no longer looks anything like this. Also the current image in the infobox is low quality, it would be good to get high resolution one. --Neb (talk) 11:39, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image for infobox
Talk:Finger Lakes Railway

message: This page contains some newsy material that is really more appropriate for a railfan page or for the company web site than for the encyclopedic style of Wikipedia. See WP:DATED
User 74.79.80.60 has contributed lots to this page. Perhaps it's time to get a login! Phytism (talk) 13:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keeping it encyclopedic
Talk:Flemington Bridge railway station

message: Someone changed the station's location in this article from its original (and correct) location of North Melbourne, Victoria, to say that this station is in Flemington, Victoria. Despite the name, it is in North Melbourne, as clearly shown by the metlink site that this article links to, and the Melway street directory. Asa01 02:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The station is in [[North Melbourne, Victoria]]
Talk:Livonia, Avon and Lakeville Railroad

message: Why is this article in the present tense? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.137.168.129 (talk • contribs) .
:Why wouldn't it be? --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 18:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a nice article. It is assessed as C-class because, though it has some citations, not all of the material is cited (B1=no). Otherwise, it would be B-class. Djmaschek (talk) 01:36, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment as C-Class
Talk:Glen Iris railway station

message: Recently, I have been working on this article to improve it to Good Article status. To achieve this status, I have followed this guide. Upon completion, I have nominated this article for Good Article status on 8/1/2023.  HoHo3143 (talk) 10:55, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article nomination
Talk:Bairnsdale V/Line rail service

message: Isn't this line called the Orbost Line, not the Bairnsdale Line? The latter, as far as I was aware is the name of the operational line - and as such the line diagram should be on that page. Is this the case? JRG 23:35, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well we currently have 3 overlapping articles, this one, the Gippsland railway line, Victoria and the Orbost railway line, Victoria. I think we need to crop it back to 2 only. Personally, even though the Gippsland article says it encompasses the whole region of lines, I think that should focus on the line to Orbost and the Orbost stub be incorporated into that. The Bairnsdale article can focus on the current VLine service. Nomadtales 01:25, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Gippsland railway line article is supposed to be about all the lines in the gippsland area main line and any branch lines, then after that each seperate line has an article on it, so the gippsland line page gives a breif history on each line then with a link to the full article, bairnsdale and orbost are two seperate lines in gippsland so each should have their own article then be covered in the main gippsland article, does this make more sense? --Dan027 11:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see your point but this is not what Rail transport in Victoria#Gippsland line is implying and this links to Gippsland railway line, Victoria. There is a separate section on there for the South Gippsland line. Also that article should be renamed Gippsland railway lines (plural). Nomadtales 01:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orbost Line 

message: There is no railway called the "Gippsland Railway" or a line called the "Gippsland Railway line". The writing style of this article is bad and it is riddled with errors (i.e: RFR upgrades won't be completed until 2005) and does not fit in with the others railways in Victoria pages (see: List of regional railway stations in Victoria) which are categorised by line, not area. All the information on this page is confusing as it talks about multiple unrelated lines as being all linked to eachother. I vote it should be deleted.
Somebody in the WWW 23:28, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: From [[Talk:Gippsland railway line, Victoria]]

message: Would anybody oppose merging Traralgon railway line, Victoria with Bairnsdale railway line, Victoria, or both into the Orbost railway line, Victoria article? The one railway line doesn't need five articles (including the Pakenham and Dandenong triplification ones), and the Traralgon/Bairnsdale articles are just a basic list of stations which passenger services run to and some basic details. --Somebody in the WWW (talk) 09:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Seymour railway line, Victoria which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 10:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Gardiner railway station

message: It's probably not notable - but would it not be at least as notable as the mention of the metcard vending machines?  It's a permanent wood structure just outside platform 1 (about 2 metres from the entrance), not something that a vendor wheels in every day to sell papers.
Jwoodger (talk) 00:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You make a good point - I've deleted the detail on the metcard vending machines as I agree it is similarly non-notable minutiae.  I'm familiar with the news-stand; in my view it's simply not something of note at the railway station; permanent news-stands are a familiar site across the suburban network and I'd suggest this example is no more noteworthy.  Murtoa (talk) 04:32, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Agreed Jwoodger (talk) 05:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  News-stand Building 

message: I found a pic labelled  M-class steam locomotive No.226 at Gardiner Station.  This pic doesnt really look like Gardiner station, but does anyone think it is at all possible (since I cannot find any other suburb or train station by the name of Gardiner)?  It ALMOST looks like the Burke Street intersection in the distance and the train is travelling towards the city on what would be Platform 2... Jwoodger (talk) 00:44, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I reckon it is Gardiner station (and I agree there were no other Gardiner stations) but I reckon it's heading away from the city with the photo taken near Burke Rd. Murtoa (talk) 10:01, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I agree with the direction too (had a quick look this morning) and landscape looks very similar - of course without the footbridge or other buildings/carpark in the distance. Jwoodger (talk) 23:46, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any other Gardiner stations? 

message: Recently, I have been working on this article to improve it to Good Article status. To achieve this status, I have followed this guide. Upon completion, I have nominated this article for Good Article status on 6/1/2023.  HoHo3143 (talk) 10:55, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article nomination
Talk:Mentone railway station

message: There have been various updates and reverts in this article about the station temporarily closure from 26 March 2020 until mid July, in the Infobox but no details of this in the article itself. Today I found a valid reference  about the proposed closure which I included in the article. However a look at the timetable for the Frankston line and then Mentone station, I found an alert at  although it shows date of late 2018 in the URL, lists planned changes until 2021. It mentions some changes at Mentone station but no mentions of any closure of the station this year. So has the temporary closure actually taken place?Fleet Lists (talk) 05:10, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station closure March 2020
Talk:Craigieburn railway station

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* Write here
Should be -37° 36' 10.23", +144° 56' 34.54" as viewed on google maps. See 
Boydy80 (talk) 17:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:Seymour, Victoria

message: sad to see no mention of the 2 lawn bowling clubs, Seymour bowling club located in Talkarook street, and the Seymour VRI bowling club located on Anzac avenue....worthwhile updating methinks. Cheers Ian Eichfuss 120.21.12.167 (talk) 16:39, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia content must be cited to reliable sources. If you can find such material, please feel free to add content. HiLo48 (talk) 07:32, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  no mention of historic n successful lawn bowls clubd
Talk:Algore

message: "Algore" is Rush Limbaugh's purile and derogatory nickname for the former vice-president, and should not have its own page, currently a simple redirect to Al Gore. There is no purpose for this page other than as a insult against the man.
Perhaps it should redirect to Jargon of The Rush Limbaugh Show instead. --Nerd42 (talk) 02:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

message: "Algore" is Rush Limbaugh's purile and derogatory nickname for the former vice-president, and should not have its own page, currently a simple redirect to Al Gore. There is no purpose for this page other than as a insult against the man. It is not a misspelling, and no similer redirect exists for "Billclinton" or "Georgebush." Kitteneatkitten 03:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Algore]] → [[Al Gore]]
Talk:The New Inventors

message: Hi there I was just wondering if a list could be added with people that have apeared on the show going on to be sucessfull in there invention that they proposed to the show. --MattyC3350 12:38, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Sucessfull Inventions 

message: Production #	Episode #	Season Episode#	Episode Name	Inventions Shown	Original Air Date
001         	         	               	            	                	
Would appreciate some assistance from other New Inventors fans to help populate the list.
-- S13dg3 (talk) 09:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Season #: YYYY-YYYY

message: cool  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.254.104.182 (talk) 06:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  omg
Talk:2005 in baseball

message: "August 31 - ...who lose 10-5 to the St. Louis Cardinals at Dolphins Stadium..."
At the time, it was Pro Players Stadium, so I think that the article should say Pro Players Stadium. --Chitomcgee 03:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: August 31

message: The whole situation is about the final standings and how it's presented. However another contradiction is the size of the article. Articles should be 32 KBs or less. It's not like the standings are completely erased. The 2005 standings is a new article. Until we can have an article 32 KBs or less with the standings, it should stay the way it is. Kingjeff 22:54, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The only way the articles are going to end up under 32K is if you break up events into month-by-month articles, which would render the pages nearly useless (once you go month-by-month, contributors are going to start adding endless details on every game, and then we'll be heading toward day-by-day articles). Again, the Wikipedia guidelines on article size clearly state that even at 50K, articles might not need splitting up. I think we can get the pages down to under 50K, but 32K for a well-covered year is going to be virtually impossible. I'll add that a majority of featured articles are over 40K, and about a quarter of them are over 50K (Microsoft, featured last week, is 88K), so there seems to be a widely accepted view among contributors that articles of that size are not necessarily too long. MisfitToys 20:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction of other years in baseball articles
Talk:FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives, 1970s

message: From what I have found out Edward Bunker was on the Ten Most Wanted Fugitives list in the 70s. Does anyone know when? I couldn't figure it out... cKaL (talk) 18:42, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edward Bunker
Talk:FBI Ten Most Wanted Fugitives, 1950s

message: "Eight Nazi agents who had planned sabotage operations against American targets were arrested. " in the 50s? Who whay what wherer whwn.  Rich Farmbrough, 13:42 13  October 2006 (GMT).
JUSTIN WAS HERE :) <:^)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.203.23.51 (talk) 13:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nazi?
Talk:Simmons SDS-V

message: This article has a few issues to be resolved. This article has great detail about the SDS-V, but starts to stray from the specific topic. It goes on to talk about other makes and models of Simmons kits and the company's closure. I believe whoever created this article didn't know that there was already one that discussed the rest of the company's history, etc. I think that we should either merge this article into the main article, or we could eliminate the sections that stray away from the topic at hand.
Thanks,
Destin 00:32, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This instrument (as the first of its kind) and the company are each sufficiently notable for an article of their own. There is no merger banner on the company now, and I am removing the merger banner from here. - Fayenatic (talk) 19:30, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:April Matson

message: Removed half the paragraph related to kyle XY.  It was inaccurate and poorly written.
--bettse@onid.orst.edu
Removed use of "OMFG" referring to date of birthday being close to date of Kyle XY premiere.
:Sorry, but I'm removing characters. What does this have to do with Matson? After all, it is unencyclopedic. --Chat?|~-$*Kimberly*$-~|Contribs 20:14, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Primary market

message: Hi Please can you give me examples of primary and secondary markets  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 800323tm (talk • contribs) 19:04, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary and secondary market 

message: plz give me ur valuable views  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.164.54.45 (talk) 10:14, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: primary market deals with ipo , right issues, preferential issues and private placement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.164.119.167 (talk) 10:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  primary market recession or boom
Talk:Gastr del Sol

message: Am I the only one who has even seen this page and finds it totally NPOV? It also reads like it's a copyrighted, pasted, review. --Kultur 04:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll strip it down now.  The fact that it's such a huge chunk of text makes it hard to think of where to start but I'll try.  Jellypuzzle | Talk 15:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tuxedo, New York

message: The article makes it seem like the hospital vanished in the first half of the century, but it closed in... the 1980s? (I guess it was a _really slow_ decline.) Can anyone shed any light on this? (My father was an anesthesiologist that worked there [and at Nyack, who shared anesthesia services with Tuxedo].) -HiFiGuy 04:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slow decline... "hospital"
File talk:A diagram representing a convex mirror, which shows its focal point, focal length, center of curvature, and the principal axis.png

message: This figure is flawed. Firstly, it doesn't show the direction from which the light comes. This is important, because it is this (and only this) which determines whether the mirror is "convex" or "concave". (In general, the non-reflective surface can be transparent. One can have a "rear-surface" curved mirror.)
Secondly, the focal length, as shown, is incorrect. The distance to the focus and center of curvature are measured from the reflective surface, of course!--Srleffler 04:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The figure was later revised to fix those flaws.--Srleffler (talk) 05:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Khellendros

message: I think this article ought be moved back to Khellendros, as it is his current title. DoomsDay349 04:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I somewhat agree. "Khellendros" Dragonlance gets more hits than "Skie" Dragonlance at Google. It is a matter of whether Skie was more famous as overlord or as Kitiara's mount. -- ReyBrujo 18:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But we have redirected Khellendros to Skie anyway, so they'll still come to this page. ddcc 03:55, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If Khellendros is the correct name, Skie should be a redirect to Khellendros, not the other way around. --66.227.166.54 22:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The naming convention is to create the article in the most common name. Thus, we would create an article for Sleet at Sleet (dragon) or Sleet (Dragonlance), not Terrisleetix. The question, now, is which one is the most common name. -- ReyBrujo 22:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it counts for anything, the dlnexus lists it as Khellendros. DoomsDay349 18:46, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK...this just kinda died off.  Can we get back to figuring it out?  As for common name, the only one who calls him Skie is Kitiara I believe.  DoomsDay349 21:31, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to put my two cents in here. MW and TH have used both forms in their books, but the most common one in the 5th Age was Khellendros, Skie is more of the 4th Age name for him. He is now commonly referred to as Khellendros or the Storm over Krynn.--Kranar drogin 02:40, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, the topic has died.  I don't know the policy for moving to an existing page, but we really ought to get this going.  Khellendros is the most common name, that we agree on.  So let's get this moving then, eh? DoomsDay349 17:15, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Accoriding to meta, it should be able to be moved back if the original was a redirect, which it is, however, apparently the pages are messed up now.ddcc 00:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NVM. It was just my outdated cache. ddcc 00:53, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks for moving it!  I'm glad we finally got that out of the way. DoomsDay349 04:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Khelldros Compared to Skie
Talk:USS General Pike

message: Zebulon Pike was killed at the Battle of Sacketts Harbor. Was the ship already named for him before he was killed? He was already world famous, but he was still alive. Is this the only battle in which a soldier was killed in action during an engagement involving a ship already named after him?
Also, I haven't found any record that he was a general before 1813.M dorothy 04:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: General Zebulon Pike
Talk:Perrey Reeves

message: As for Reeves age:
peoplefinders.com lists: 
*The subject's purported date of birth has been removed. Please reference Biographies of living persons [] and WP:V . The peoplefinders.com database is considered a primary source and may be cited only if you are legally certain you have identified the correct person and the database citation is used in support of a secondary source. Neither requirement has been satisfied in your edit. Also, please sign your entries here. Thanks. Chai Walla 20:39, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text here seems very close to the IMDB biography. -- Beardo 02:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMDB text
Talk:Marc Brown (author)

message: This article could use some attention. It's a bit wishy-washy feel good and, in places, rather juvenile. For instance, I doubt Encarta, et al. are calling Arthur "the most popular aardvark in the whole world".
Mdbrownmsw 15:26, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. There seem to be no citations for the quotes and other information presented as fact. --Markzero 05:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: Someone should make an article regarding the books of Arthur. It'd be interesting to see the difference between the books and TV and information about the book series in general  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.142.78.67 (talk) 13:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arthur Books

message: I redid some of the formatting on these and as I own some of these titles I'll see if I can check to make sure they're where and how they should be as soon as I get home. I'm not a hundred percent sure these are written by Marc Brown though, I thought they were based on teleplays from episodes of the TV show written by others...--207.75.32.83 (talk) 21:52, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arthur Chapter Books 

message: The suggestion to merge the Arthur's Teacher Trouble article into here is not a good idea, and IMHO should be removed. Can I remove it? Connectionfailure (talk) 01:50, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove merge suggestion
Talk:Great Bear (roller coaster)

message: , can you please provide the sources which you know to exist which indicate notability for this topic? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:17, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: , I noticed you are challenging the notability of several coasters. WikiProject Amusement Parks typically supports having articles for roller coasters that have a unique design and received coverage in secondary sources. These generally meet WP:GNG. However, cookie-cutter designs that see multiple installations around the world are not really noteworthy. Also, coasters that may be unique but came and went with only basic coverage in press releases shouldn't have a standalone article either. In those cases, it is preferred to have a redirect and merge the content of the article into the park's main article. Great Bear and SooperDooperLooper are probably okay as standalone articles. Toboggan is definitely more questionable. Consider bringing this up at WT:WikiProject Amusement Parks for more visibility and participation. --GoneIn60 (talk) 17:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for weighing in @GoneIn60. In response to Horse Eye's Back: the Great Bear article does not consist merely of "local coverage", as was alleged in this edit summary. For example, the Morning Call (Allentown, PA) and the York Dispatch are not considered "local" - Allentown is as far from Hershey as it is from NYC. There is a feature length article about the Great Bear in the Lancaster New Era, which also isn't exactly a local newspaper. The coaster is also covered in a New Jersey newspaper. I did not include the travel reviews that I found, but these can also be used to describe critical reception. – Epicgenius (talk) 18:32, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability