lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Black marlin

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 02:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: The top speed by that study is severely understated. Years of research have I spent on black marlin and have constructed special turbine tags to measure accurately the speed of the water passing the marlin, essentially giving me the marlins speed. I have found most specimens to be able to go over 47km/h (21/24 marlin I tagged) and some able to go over 60km/h during deep dives.
I'm the smaller, younger specimens, almost full retraction of the pectoral fins along the body of the marlin has been witnessed. In larger specimens, using video from cameras on teasers both from my research and readily available videos on YouTube, the pectoral fins of large, adult black marlin can be retracted largely for reduced drag. Guyjacobsenmarine (talk) 18:15, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top speed and pectoral fins
Talk:Shortbill spearfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:31, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Striped marlin

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 00:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: — Assignment last updated by DentistToBe (talk) 01:50, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Aquatic Ecology
Talk:Julia Lynch Olin

message: This article seems to have a rather large hole in it by not listing any reason for the subject's expulsion from the Bahai Faith..anybody care to expand on it?
:it seems to have been.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasons for expulsion

message: I don't know the answer to the above question, but I do have more information that should go under "Works": She wrote another book other than those listed on the main page. I own a copy of this book which is called: "His Messengers Went Forth" by Julie Chanler. copyright 1948. Illustrated by Olin Dows. Published by Coward-McCann, inc. New York. I wasn't quite sure if I should just put this information on the page, or ask for permission, etc. I also didn't quite know what format StephenW 05:17, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The title has been added. For anyone reading this now, please note that if you have a book in hand, from a legitimate publisher, by the subject of an article, by all means add it. lists of works are de rigeur here, esp. if you cite publisher and year of publication.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Works
Talk:Kurtus

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Brooder. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 11#Brooder until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Plantdrew (talk) 00:36, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Brooder" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Blue knifefish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Blue maomao

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Grey knifefish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Girella cyanea

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 22:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Silver sweep

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 06:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cunner

message: Sometimes these Cunner are called Bigall fish.
69.121.68.125 01:44, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bergall
Talk:Thalassoma bifasciatum

message: Hi there, I see you’ve expanded this article significantly. There are a few edits that I made to your wiki article. I hyperlinked the scientific terms that may be hard for the lay reader to understand, and I added more headings to your article to break up large chunks of texts. Note that once you hit three headings a table of contents is generated. Also, I have not come around to doing this, but you should make sure you have the appropriate in-line citations for your article. It seems that you have plenty of references, but it is still hard to figure out which reference article refers to which segment you have written. I think that your grammar and neutral style are very reflective of the kind of encyclopedic content Wikipedia strives to have.  GenesBrainsBehaviorNeuroscienceKL (talk) 08:06, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review
Talk:Crimson cleaner fish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Girdled wrasse

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:59, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Quadram Institute Bioscience

message: I hope what I have done so far is OK.  I didn't want to write too much as I have connections to the institute and may not have NPOV.
Questions left: How is the Institute financed, how much influence has food industy on the results of the research?
Substantion: We remember the BSE-Tragedy. Millions of cattle and sheep were killed, the knowledge of BSE caused a loss billions in Food-Industry.
What happens, if research shows, that the increase of allergies are caused by modern basic materials and food processing? 
For instance the extensive use of (cheap) whey protein in (childrens) food. 
Might such results be suppressed to keep the the business growing?
Our future life and our health depends on the reliability of such research - please append trustworthy informations about the financial sources of the Institute of Food Research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.223.91.109 (talk) 10:04, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Inscribed wrasse

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 20:40, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Hogfish

message: Calling this fish a "dick" is not vandalism.  See Halichoeres Mbac (talk) 01:20, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism concerns 
Talk:Humphead wrasse

message: I have a problem with the picture labeled "female humphead wrasse at the surface".  These fish do not have sexual dimorphism, therefore you could only infer this from the size, which may be incorrect as there have been mid-sized males reported.-- Ochotona (talk) 21:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: content

message: What does their diet consist of? I don't see any info on that. 67.86.206.168 (talk) 02:50, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diet 

message: https://www.them.us/story/british-library-fish-sex-pride-tweet
©Geni (talk) 02:39, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible source for a culture section if this passes WP:RS

message: The fish is studied for over a hundred and fifty years, so there is no way the subject was not analysed. However, there is no information about within a quick search, the only thing results indicate is that scientists suggest the reason for the hump, but not about what is inside it and why it id inedible. 91.223.75.168 (talk) 08:04, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NO information on the hump’s content?
Talk:Huddersfield railway station

message: I've replaced the image into the infobox.  The  is a standard template designed to be put on all UK railway station articles, and is meant to include an image.  I chose what I thought was the most appropriate image from those already on the page.
On a related subject, this article (and others about nearby stations on the Penistone Line) contains some very nice, but rather large images.  What these articles need is more text (history, service descriptions, etc.) rather than just some nice photographs (and the photos could do with being made a bit smaller).  --RFBailey 17:49, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: I very much agree that we shouldn't include the Grand Union Railway service in the article until the service is more than simply a proposal. Adambro 17:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be given a brief mention but there is detailed information elsewhere on the web. Workbyagraduate 13:02, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future services 
Talk:Long green wrasse

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:25, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Spotty (fish)

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 00:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed