lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:God Part II

message: I've long tried to figure out just what this song is getting at.   Is it written from the POV of John Lennon, pointing out some contradictions and hypocricy in the process?  Or is it written from Bono's POV?  Or is it something else entirely?
--208.204.155.241 22:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song meaning? 
Talk:The Atheism Tapes

message: As you can probably see from the article, I've separated out the people into their own section and am going through them to add basic summaries of the episodes, one by one.
Any help would be vastly appreciated :) -UK-Logician-2006 00:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding episode summaries

message: Hi, this article is tagged to be copyedited but it looks like you haven't finished writing yet. I'm going to pull the tag off for the moment - go ahead and put one back on when the article is finished and ready to have grammar, punctuation and links checked before going to a proofreader.
Good luck!
~ Otterpops 15:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Er, who is "you"?  I found the article, saw that it was full of stylistic and other errors, and tagged it.  If I get the chance, I'll copy-edit it myself — but pleased don't remove the termplate until the work's done. --Mel Etitis  (Talk) 15:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's OK — not to worry. --Mel Etitis  (Talk) 22:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Apologies for completely forgetting about this article! I've finished a first draft of Dennett's episode, and will look into doing some of the others in the fairly near future :) -UK-Logician-2006 15:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Ready for Copy Editing
Talk:Goin' Down Slow

message: I have removed this article from Wikipedia:WikiProject Led Zeppelin because the song was only covered by them partially in concert. So the relationship is just too distant for management under that project, but Zep's partial live cover is still worth listing in the article. Others can disagree with me if they so choose, and can add the article back to the project by re-inserting the "WP Led Zeppelin" tag (within brackets) to this talk page. Doomsdayer520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:27, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Led Zeppelin Project
Talk:Going Underground

message: I'm sad to see that the analysis section was removed. It didn't seem like a particularly controvertial interpretation of the lyrics, so don't think a lack of citations was a sufficient reason to remove it (I do understand the importance of citations). The style of writing was a bit different to what I'd personally use, but I think the solution in that case is to improve the style rather than delete the content entirely. 
Criticising and destroying others' work is easy (the original wasn't mine, by the way!), whereas creating good writing is hard. I'm not a regular Wikipedia contributor and don't understand the editing process. However, this kind of thing discourages me from contributing, and I don't think I want to write something only for it to be deleted.
131.111.184.7 (talk) 00:12, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Analysis Section - why?? 

message: covered in 1986 2A02:8109:D80:2FA4:E46B:5E0A:C25E:26A6 (talk) 13:39, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manfred Mann
Talk:Golden Touch (song)

message: I have heard that Razorlight wrote the song 'Golden Touch'.
 
This seems strange since I watched it performed at Woodstock in 1969.
 
A number of films have been made about the Woodstock festival and one of them was shown on BBC in England a couple of years ago. This featured the song (Golden Touch) being played (not on stage but in front of a caravan by the side of the stage). 
So unless one of the members of Razorlight (or The Cure if we are to believe the Wiki article) has a time machine.......
Newton1600 (talk) 23:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Golden Touch NOT a Razorlight song - just a cover
Talk:Gonna Fly Now

message: I'm pretty sure Gonna Fly Now is NOT the theme of Rocky. The song played at the beginning of Rocky is called "Fanfare for Rocky". Gonna Fly Now is the most famous song from the movie, but it is not the theme. Consider changing please.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.65.87 (talk) 00:21, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is! Let's compare.
**Gonna Fly Now: 1, 2, 3, 5 (I Think), Balboa
**Fanfare: 1, 2, 3, 5
So It Is. And for the record "Eye Of A Tiger" is the most famous 24.56.20.41 (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not The Theme Song 

message: There's a claim that the lyrics are only 30 words long, and that's what appeared in the movie, but there are other lyrics, starting "Rocky's ready to make a move, yeah". Was this a ploy like Gene Roddenberry's, writing unused words to the Trek theme song to be able to claim royalties on it? Or were they just tagged on later, or dropped earlier? What's the history here? --184.153.150.57 (talk) 18:12, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: Does anyone else think like me that the fanfare at the beginning of this song played by brassy trumpets was inspired by the first bars of the symphony called “Wellington’s Victory” by Ludwig van Beethoven ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clio XIX-XX (talk • contribs) 12:32, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was it inspired by Beethoven ? 

message: I have reverted the addition of multiple song samples.  There is no sourced commentary to support these nonfree song samples so they do not meet WP:NFCC#8.  And multiple versions of them collectively fail to adhere to WP:NFCC#3a. -- Whpq (talk) 15:34, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, removal is the correct action. Binksternet (talk) 15:45, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple song samples
Talk:Gonna Make You Sweat (Everybody Dance Now)

message: We need more! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.198.48.71 (talk) 21:59, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't There be Some Links?? 

message: Question. How the haven is this still a Stub Class? Would someone from one or either WikiProjects please review the article? it looks at least Start Class to me in the sources department! MIVP - (Can I Help? ◕‿◕) (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 13:10, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is seriously Stub Class? 
Talk:Names for the human species

message: Categories_for_deletion/Log/2006_August_5#Category:Names_for_Human conversion from category to list. Suryadas 20:48, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Why does Zoon politikon redirect here if the page does not even mention Zoon politikon once? It just does not make any sense. Obviously, Zoon politikon should be included and if for some reason that cannot be done then Zoon politikon simply should not redirect to this page. 139.133.36.23 (talk) 11:26, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Zoon politikon

message: What about the homo compensator? 08:34, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To compensate the same

message: I removed Homo sacer from the list.  While it fits in with the rest in form, it is actually a Roman legal term used to refer to individuals, not the human species.
Also, Homo ludens should perhaps be on the list, since it is often used in contrast with Homo faber (already on the list).  I didn't add it because there's no existing page for Homo ludens, and it's not a topic I'm knowledgeable about. Aidan 18:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: non sucker

message: Hi, I came across this during a passage for comprehension in a management exam in addition to Homo economicus and Homo faber. Perhaps this term needs to be included, if genuine. AshLin (talk) 14:50, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: now added (they meant ignorans but were ignorant of Latin). --dab (𒁳) 12:25, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Homo ignorantis

message: list of terms and references taken from  --dab (𒁳) 11:28, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I've never seen this, but as far as I know, humans are the only animals who wear clothing.  We're finding that other animals use tools, build things, even communicate verbally; but I haven't heard of any animals who wear clothes.Baruch60610 (talk) 20:44, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: homo vestitus -- apparenty, Thomas of Aquinas thought of it and thought it was absurd.Contra Gent 2.84. Thomas is saying that if you take away the clothes, the naked man is still a man. But of course the argument that "alone among primates, man has the tendency to wear clothes" is different, and outside of the scope of Thomas' point. It's still interesting that the term is considered and rejected as  a "species" name by Thomas back in the 13th century. --dab (𒁳) 12:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Clothes Wearing

message: The term is often attributed to Joseph Soloveitchik's 1965 essay, "The Lonely Man of Faith." Some also attribute it to H. O. Pappe's 1961 article "On philosophical anthropology." I have been unable to find the term in either work. The only source I've found is Luigi Romeo's "Ecco Home: A Lexicon of Man." Romeo attributes the term to H. O. Pappe, but I have been unable to find the source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlsonloggie (talk • contribs) 21:03, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Homo Absconditus
Talk:Good (Better Than Ezra song)

message: This was NOT a good album--189.148.129.4 (talk) 05:30, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please use the talk page to discuss the article, not the relative musical merits of its subject. - Dravecky (talk) 06:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning 
Talk:Good Times (Chic song)

message: "Rapper's Delight" outperformed "Good Times" in the charts and popularised the bassline and the song, and it became one of the most sampled tracks (and hence one of the most distinctive basslines) in the history of recorded music. Having agreed on a commercial structure for the use of their song in "Rappers Delight", Edwards and Rodgers agreed to later uses in other songs, subject to their strict criteria.
As Good Times reached number one on the Billboard Hot 100 and Rapper's Delight 36 this is not at all true and I suggested it is removed. - Phildav76 (talk) 20:20, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factually wrong 

message: This section should probably distinguish inspired songs from directly sampled songs. Some of the songs on that list share very little, and the likeness could be little more than coincidence. 24.255.213.12 (talk) 08:42, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sampling and motifs: inspired vs. sampled 

message: Maybe ... "Let's Get It On" by Snow (Murder Love, 1995). Do you agree? --Kraschnaut (talk) 23:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sampling and motifs:  "Let's Get It On" by Snow (Murder Love, 1995)? 
Talk:Good Vibrations (Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch song)

message: Man, I was so excited when I saw what might be a hip-hop cover of (the original) Good Vibrations. I had no idea what it would sound like, but I was damn sure it'd be awesome. Oh well. :-/ --MQDuck (talk) 06:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Beach Boys
Talk:Goodbye Girl (Squeeze song)

message: Move to Goodbye Girl (Squeeze song). Parsecboy (talk) 01:16, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: * I will move it on the 30th if no more further objections. unless someone else wants to do it earlier. Oldag07 (talk) 00:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Goodbye, Dolly Gray

message: I've removed the link to "don't cry dolly grey" as this is a different song with a different tune by different writers!
Don't cry dolly grey is by Bryan/Paley, not Cobb/barnes.
-Anomynous:
It also seem this song was used in a new game on the "Xbox LIVE Arcade" named "Toy Soldiers".
It is used as a main menu tune. I am not a usual person here, so I don't want to disturb the page by editing it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.13.54.161 (talk) 14:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Goodnite, Sweetheart, Goodnite

message: The above comment by 71.198.250.137 is correct. There's a 1931 song of this title written by Irving King (Campbell & Connelly) with Ray Noble. It needs to be added, but this isn't my field, and I don't know if it's a different song  or an earlier version of the same one. Gordonofcartoon 00:04, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed accuracy

message: The song mentioned above is completely different, but with a similar title. It is not an earlier version of the Spaniels' song, as even the most casual of comparative listens would reveal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Domino27 (talk • contribs) 11:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Different Songs

message: "This song has the sub-title "it's time to go" with the now famous doo-wop bass line intro. This bass line was however not included in the McGuire Sisters cover version, made to sell to white audiences."
No source given for that. The McGuire Sisters version did include the part, but it was not sung doo-wop style for the obvious reason that they were not doo-wop singers. In the Spaniels version, the "doo-wop bass line intro" was some "do-do" syllables sung by a male vocalist in the bass register. On the McGuire Sisters version, a saxophone played the notes of the part. The McGuire Sisters were a close harmony group and did not have a bass vocalist who could sing the part. 
It is obvious from the nature of the McGuire Sisters style that the fact that the part was done instrumentally instead of vocally didn't have anything to do with whether or not their version was "made to sell to white audiences". Anyway, many doo-wop groups also had white audiences. If the implication is that white audiences did not like doo-wop music, that is demonstrably not true. Jim C. (talk) 14:15, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "doo-wop bass line intro"
Talk:Catherine Baker Knoll

message: ...Rocks, the daughter of a successful grocer who later served as burgess of McKees Rocks...
What exactly does it mean that she was "burgess of McKees Rocks? (Alphaboi867 20:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burgess? 

message: This article states that Catherine Baker Knoll's predeccessor as State Treasurer was Budd Dwyer, but according to his article, he committed suicide in January. 1987, two years before Baker Knoll became State Treasurer in 1989. Was the office simply left vacant for those two years or was another person appointed to fill the vacancy? --TommyBoy 12:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: State Treasurer Predeccessor
Talk:Goody Goody

message: Showaddywaddy links to this article. As I have never heard their "Goody goody" I leave it to experts to valuate that link. 18:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Showaddywaddy
Talk:Gossip Folks

message: There is a Turkish porn series called Istanbul Life featuring Ṣahin K, who may remind many of the American Ron Jeremy.  In one scene in one film he is flirting with a woman in a record store.  In the background "Gossip Folks" is playing.  Though no sex occurs in the scene, it sure did seem like this song could be deemed as being part of a soundtrack for this porn film.  I wonder if Missy Elliott or Timbaland know about this film or have considered suing.  Perhaps "there is no such thing as bad publicity!"  jcm 3/27/9  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.228.129.9 (talk) 14:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song Usage in Porn Movie 

message: I removed the line "The entire video takes place at a school where everyone wears red Adidas sweatsuits as uniforms." from the article.  Maybe the first few seconds are like that and they appear from time to time but whoever added that must have missed the shirts and ties the guys were mostly wearing.  --172.72.47.40 (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniforms
Talk:Got Ur Self a Gun

message: Was he dissing Limp and Kid Rock with that line mentioning them or what?--Woop-Woop That's the sound of da Police 19:10, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it. https://genius.com/657456. Firezzasd (talk) 02:19, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Mentions
Talk:Granada (song)

message: The 'Some Recorded Versions' section is a mess.  It starts out as a dated list and then lapses into a uncoordinated list in no particular order.  If I had time I'd redo it, but not at this time.86.16.153.234 (talk) 11:58, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Recorded Versions
Talk:Devon Corporation

message: I propose that the page not be deleted. Reason being, it plays an important role in the games, allowing the player to recieve certain important items and revive fossils into Pokémon. It is the Hoenn equivilant to Silph Co.. I think it plays an important role in the games, and thus should not be deleted. By the way, yes I was the one who created the page, but this is not me taking offence, it's me really believing this is an important article. --ARSNL 20:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia isn't a game guide.  This level of detail belongs on some game site, not in Wikipedia.  --John Nagle 22:12, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nevertheless, the information is useful to those that would view the page on a regular basis. And besides, the Anime info would not be on any game website. Also, don't forget, this page talks about the fictional company, not the building itself. It it were a page on just the building itself, then I would agree with you. ARSNL 01:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

text: The Devon Corp. plays a major role in both the game and the anime.  It is used in both of them to introduce the main antagonists in the storyline.  It also produces all of the items necessary for the trainers in both the game and the anime to take the long journeys they take on foot.  It also produces the Pokénav and gives it to the trainers in both of them, therefore they have a map and are able to complete the journey.  Also, in the game, without the Devon Corp's ability to revive fossils the player would not be able to complete the Pokédex, and therefore, the game.  The Devon Corp. may not be at the forefront of the game or the anime, but it is a major plot device in both of them.--Hybrid 08:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How sad! Peter Shearan 13:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Please, Shearan, that's not contributing to the discussion. Do you even follow Pokémon? If not, how can you commment? --ARSNL 14:11, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete?
Talk:Green Eyes (Aquellos Ojos Verdes)

message: the english part is not synchronised with the spanish part...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.159.233.63 (talk) 10:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  lyrics problem
Talk:Fort Brown

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 11:46, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Adventurer

message: Didn't there used to be an order to the entries of Historical & Fictional adventurers? The Bearded One 03:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disorder 

message: I've removed Harry Potter because "A schoolboy who has an interesting life, however full of "adventures" is not an adventurer."  --Tony Sidaway 15:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Harry Potter

message: It has been almost one year since I noted that the order of entries has become more and more random.  Therefore, unless I am dissuaded by the community, I will impose such order as I see fit in the next week or so.  Comments welcome and appreciated. The Bearded One (talk) 20:47, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ordering of Entries

message: If a particular adventurer is not notable enough to have a Wikipedia article of their own, then they are likely not notable enough to appear on this page.  Until there is a page for Brandon Reynolds, he should be absent from the listings here. The Bearded One (talk) 06:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed a few non-notable entries on the lists.  Please refrain from overcrowding this page. The Bearded One (talk) 22:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:N|Notability]]

message: "Adventurer" is one of many similarly negative terms referring to males (some of which can be found at Rake (character) but which also include eg blackguard), "adventuress" appears to be the only such term applied to women. Are there any others? Jackiespeel (talk) 18:18, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Gold-digger? Vixen? --GRuban (talk) 01:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology

message: At time of writing, Robin Hood is listed under "Historical adventurers" - is there much evidence for his being a historical character, at least as described?  (The description appears to me to reference the classical "steal from the rich to give to the poor, Maid Marion and Merry Men version".) (edit: My apologies, I forgot to sign. ^^; ) --41.246.23.103 (talk) 22:41, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robin Hood - Historical Adventurer? 

message: I think both articles would benefit  - not sure how long the proposal has been up but will go ahead if no objections by the end of July Thruxton (talk) 07:23, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Adventure
Talk:Gypsy (Fleetwood Mac song)

message: There could be more on the specific content of the video.  There are sepia-toned sequences where the band members are working-class people ca. 1920, black-and-white sequences where they're more upper class people ca. 1940, and color sequences where Stevie Nicks is reflecting about the past, or dancing with little girls in a kind of quasi-fairyland... AnonMoos (talk) 01:46, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Music video
Talk:Sebring, Florida

message: Anyone know the correct pronunciation of the name (seb-ring or see-bring)?  It seems that car is named after the track, which is named after the town, but none of the topics have the pronunciation. Leejc 20:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: I went and removed a raft of external links for radio stations not in Sebring (including an internet-based radio station), a youth-wrestling group, and the Tampa Tribune, which is available through the wikilink in the Media section. I left the two Sebring papers (Highlands Today and the News-Sun), the Chamber of Commerce, the library, and Sebring High School. I considered removing the High School, but left it in for now because there is no education section discussing the schools in the city. When the article gets expanded (and it will get expanded), the school link will not be necessary any longer. Let's not let the external links for a smallish city occupy a significant chunk of the entire article. Horologium t-c 18:00, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: I have begun a major expansion on this article. I started with an infobox and a minimal history section (which desparately needs to be beefed up.) I will be adding government, education, economy, transportion, and sites of interest sections this weekend, and would appreciate any suggestions for filling out this article. I was a bit surprised to see how many historic areas have stubs written up; it looks like one of the Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places editors went through and added all of them, which is a good thing. There's nine in all, which will make a nice section for the sites of interest section. Horologium t-c 20:21, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 
Talk:Guruvayur Keshavan

message: Wow the first paragraph of this reads like a PETA protest outside a zoo...Khallus Maximus (talk) 15:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  First paragraph
Talk:Mathews–Powell House

message: Stub/Low Bhaktivinode 12:34, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Texas
Talk:Half-Breed (song)

message: The article states that the song did not chart in Germany, yet there is a charting for Germany in the table.  Could someone please reference this charting and remove the mention in the text, or remove the charting?  Thanks, Abrazame (talk) 00:50, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Germany 

message: Is there a reason that the songwriters' names are omitted from the body of the article?  I'm not sure I've ever seen that on a song page here before.  Since the article criticizes them for their ignorance of the subject matter, omitting their names seems sort of self-defeating.  (And they did write a number one song, after all.)Ajericn (talk) 11:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Songwriters