Talk:Scott Thomas Beauchamp controversy/Archive 8

message: Trying to get this back on track, Matt Drudge is not by any stretch of the imagination a reliable source (I'm still waiting for Bill Clinton's black baby). The memos would be citable within the article once they get picked up by a reliable news organization, and if the story really is All That, it'll come to that point before too long. At this point, the best strategy is probably to keep them in mind, table it for now, and revisit in a week or so. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 12:27, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah... great to hear from the voice of reason.  Crockspot, should I provide links to some of your more "colorful" statements you've made in the past?  Do you really wish to re-open that can of worms?  Let me know.  (By the way, how's the RFCU on TheDeciderDecides coming?) --Eleemosynary 06:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *WTF? What does my already admitted questionable behavior in the distant past (which never was bad enough to warrant a block) have to do with your behavior right now? We should learn from our mistakes, and grow. You seem to be stuck in the same mode. I'm not sure what you mean about TDD either. He was determined to be the sockpuppet of your good buddy Bmedly Sutler, who was himself a puppet of FAAFA, who used your name and set you up in order to attack me. - Crockspot 16:18, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's relevant because you're in no position to lecture anyone on civility.  (And the "distant past" ruse can be easily dispelled.)  I bring up TDD because, back when you or your cronies were planting off-site statements attributed to my name in order to salvage your adminship application, you also accused me of being the TDD sock.  Let me know if you want the diff, and I'll post it on your Talk page.  I don't want to take up any more space here with this issue.  --Eleemosynary 07:44, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

text: *I kinda figured that last part went without saying, but just in case: I agree with Crockspot that referring to Sanchez in that way is inappropriate. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 13:56, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I only used the nickname b/c Sanchez went by it during his porn career.  If Johnny "Wadd" Holmes followed his porn vocation with a career as a lickspittle for the Democrats (as Sanchez is for the GOP), something tells me we'd being seeing Holmes referred to by that nickname on Talk pages.  But in the spirit of comity, I'll stop using his nickname. --Eleemosynary 06:11, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good, thank you. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 14:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I'll assume for now (and hope) that this promise is kept and that the gratuitous maligning of Sanchez stops.  Also, if there is any evidence that that was a nickname he used, please share it with us.  According to the article on him — which Eleemosynary insisted I should read — he didn't even use "Sanchez" in porn.  I believe that the slur was given to him by those opposed to his "right-wing" activities in the hope that it would reduce him in the eyes of others. Calbaer 18:29, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Only Sanchez has only reduced himself "in the eyes of others."  I thought we moved pass this, but if you insist, I never told you the Sanchez article -- which Sanchez has vandalized/scrubbed several times -- said anything about his prior nickname.  You can Google the related terms if you want to find out more about when he used it. --Eleemosynary 07:28, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back on track 

message: Do any of you want to explain to User:Steven Andrew Miller why his constant insertion of these these links, as well as these need to be reverted?  Or is an RFC in order? --Eleemosynary 05:44, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Smear links

message: The article lists this claim, made in the Cross memorandum.
"That the incident of blatant disrespect for a disfigured woman in the FOB Falcon DFAC is a tale completely fabricated by Private Beauchamp."
But above it says that TNR already corrected the record and that the incident was in Kuwait, not Iraq, where FOB Falcon is.  I'm adding a mention of the above info. John Duncan 13:51, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disfigured woman incident