lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Da kine

message: doesnt da kine mean the best in hawaii?
:Nope. Kukini 23:05, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A better answer would be "Yes" sometimes ;-)
I think it would great to have some examples of usage, but I will leave that to native speakers.  An audio recording wouldn't be a bad idea either. CyborgTosser (Only half the battle) 07:18, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

text: It's one syllable.  People who say kee-nay are exhibiting hyperforeignism.  Dont feel bad though, I was doing it too until about ten minutes ago.  <FONT COLOR="#800000"><B>Haplolology</B></FONT> Talk/Contributions 15:05, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  huh? 

message: These Germans would ask for things with specificity asking for "das eine" or "the one" or "that one": This does not make much sense. "that one" translates to "das da" ("that there") in German, not "das eine" (it is usually not a good idea to translate words individually and then string them together ). And while I find the cliche of Germans being particularly "specific" about things quite amusing, I am not sure what the author is implying. Maybe that if you need -say- a knife and you are not German, you can only ask for a tool, or for a "thing" (and repeat your request ad nauseam until by chance or process of elimination you finally get what you want )?! 75.35.113.217 (talk)==  —Preceding comment was added at 06:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 209.168.243.108 10:14, May 7, 2010 
Right, there was a small group of Germans brought in to Kauai, see Paul Isenberg for example. I removed it. Much more likely from the fact that neither Hawaiian nor most Asian languages have the English "th" sound, and do not end syllables with consonants.
W Nowicki (talk) 20:54, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: German?

message: There are two references to Da Kine Bail Bonds in a single section. THis needs to be cleaned up. 72.77.119.43 (talk) 10:52, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dog The Bounty Hunter 

message: "It also happens to be one of the most frustratingly difficult aspects of Pidgin for non-native speakers to understand. While reports that native speakers of Pidgin can be unforgiving of amateurs may be exaggerated, some Hawaiians get a certain pleasure from using the word to non-native speakers."  Although I think this falls under WP:OR and should be removed. Jhunt47 (talk) 01:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research
Talk:Michael Myers (Pennsylvania politician)

message: Who was expelled in 1861? Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 07:25, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Three representatives, Henry Cornelius Burnett, John Bullock Clark, and John William Reid, were expelled in 1861, all for serving in the Confederate army. (Apparently, the rules forbid treason. This is why you should read all the fine print before you sign anything.) TypoBoy (talk) 02:31, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Added some conviction info and a new reference. There are still other holes to be filled. The information that is not sourced will eventually be challenged and removed. CircuitChild (talk) 08:37, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Added citation
Talk:Christopher Skase

message: I was led to believe that skase went to Huntingdale technical school(in the early sixties). All this talk of a rich upbringing does not ring true to me. Have you any references. Could this be an invented life? Quite willing to be disabused. Eric A. Warbuton 07:26, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See this page. Ambi 07:39, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: skase early life and education

message: I'm rather certain that Christopher Skase did NOT go to Knox Grammar. First of all, look at the edit history of the user that added this to the article - they're a common vandal and spreader of misinformation, partly focused on Knox Grammar. I very much doubt their edit to this page was genuine. Secondly, searching for references about Christopher Skase having gone to Knox turns up no results other than the ones that have stemmed from this edit. - James Foster 12:19, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christopher Skase did not go to Knox 

message: Is the year of death 2001 or 2002? The article cites events after his death? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.189.250.153 (talk) 03:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He died in 2001. I've fixed that. Graham87 10:37, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of death? 

message: "According to a 1998 report..., Skase had begun obtaining and moving money into foreign bank accounts in July 1989."
Is this something worth noting in the Psychic article? V-Man737 06:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wow, really?

message: I removed these two sentences in the first paragraph of the entry as they did not make sense: 
“On 23 March 2018, he terminated at Etihad Stadium, then subsequently went on a casino and mg adventure. There is speculation to his whereabouts, but ultimately his mail has been witheld.” Blvtzpk (talk) 11:09, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks; that was vandalism. I've just reverted it properly. Graham87 15:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to second and third sentences in the entry.
Talk:Western Highway (Victoria)

message: The Western Highway in Australia is far more better known then that of the Western Highway in Belize. – AxSkov (☏)
----
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support. As per above. – AxSkov (☏) 07:51, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add any additional comments
===Decision===
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. (move request was to Western Highway) Ryan Norton T | @ | C 00:17, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. (move request was to Western Highway) Ryan Norton T | @ | C 00:17, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Decision

message: Is the Ballarat duplication including the realignment of the highway between Kenny Street and Clarks Road? Jordf32123 (talk) 03:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ballarat ambiguity
Talk:Hall, Australian Capital Territory

message: In the edit field nixie asked whether Hall was a suburb. 
On the canberra Spatial Plan it is marked as an 'urnab' area, as opposed to a 'rural vilage'. On the 'Canberra by Suburbs' website though it appears niether in Belconner nor in Gungahlin and appears to be a district of its own. This doesn't answer the question of whether it is a suburb or not. I would argue that it doesn't have the local character of a suburb, but rather that of a village. I will do some more research and ask some friends who work in the releavant Gov't Dept. Adz 07:52, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think I did read somewhere that its technically a village. Some people think its a suburb though: |Google search: "suburb of hall" canberra gets a few results. Astrokey44 06:25, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Hall a suburb?
Talk:Great Mell Fell

message: I'm not sure we need a pronunciation on something like this where all the words are (or might as well be) in English. And even if the locals do pronounce it with a glottal stop, the 't' should probably have been included. --Stemonitis 07:55, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Now comes the tricky part — how to translate "Great Mell Fell" and other similar things. In Welsh, there are two words "moel", one an adjective and one a noun. The noun means "hill", tending to be used for rounded hills, and the adjective means "bare". "Moel" does not, therefore, mean "bare hill", as is often stated; "Moel Foel" (which I'm sure is a real hill somewhere) is 'bare hill'. I assume that the same holds true for Gaelic. And that leads me to the next point: how do we know that the "mell" in "Great Mell Fell" is from Scottish Gaelic? It seems much more likely that it would come from Cumbric, which was spoken in the area only a thousand years ago. I would suggest "Great"=large (English), "Mell"=rounded hill (Cumbric), "Fell"=hill (Norse). --Stemonitis 07:55, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: This probably isn't the place to propose this, but I'm guessing that both Mark and Stem are watching this page at th moment, and it is relevant to the above comments. How about we cahnge the MTNbox UK so that it only has grid ref and listing in it, and move the "name" (translation, language, pronunciation) to the Pronunciation box. These are only relevant for some hill, (e.g not Great Mell Fell, but yes for the Scottish or Welsh ones) and could then be left off. The above discussion about where the name might have come from could be reformatted to actually appear in the article, which would be better than a simple line in the infobox. Grinner 11:06, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. That would get rid of a lot of "n/a" and "???" entries on English hills with easy names. Propose it somewhere. I'll be incommunicado for the next week, but you can proxy for me on this one, if needs be. --Stemonitis 12:45, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Just a thought
Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Terri Schiavo/archive2

message: Here you say:
I do not think that re-nominating the article so soon was the right thing to do. Editing an archived nomination is also very uncommon, to say the least. Discussion about a nomination is to be done on the talk page of the FAC nomination, not within the nomination itself. Lupo 07:59, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
I have questions about this:
* First what is a "meta-comment" (diff) (hist) . . N Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates/Terri Schiavo; 07:59 . . Lupo (Talk) (Meta-comment) 
* Second, I address re-nomination: I fixed the past problems --also Schiavo was suggested as a Featured Article in the Last Two peer reviews. It improved since then, and then more with recent edits. The "Edit war" is temporary," and does not reflect on quality.
* You say: "Discussion about a nomination is to be done on the talk page of the FAC nomination, not within the nomination itself." What is the difference between the two? I discussed it on the nomination talk page -what other pages are there?
Thx.--GordonWattsDotCom 20:08, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 Questions: Meta, Re-nom, and which-page-is-which?
Talk:Roads in Victoria

message: It was proposed below that List of Melbourne freeways be renamed and moved to List of freeways in Victoria. There was no consensus, instead it was moved to Freeways in Victoria--Henrygb 16:09, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support. As per above. – AxSkov (☏) 08:08, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments
Cassowary's right that this is more of a proper article rather than a list, so I would also support a move to Freeways in Victoria. I prefer 'Freeways in Victoria' rather than 'Victorian freeways'. – AxSkov (☏) 05:39, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add any additional comments
Cassowary's right that this is more of a proper article rather than a list, so I would also support a move to Freeways in Victoria. I prefer 'Freeways in Victoria' rather than 'Victorian freeways'. – AxSkov (☏) 05:39, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Currently the Pakenham By-pass which links the Princess Freeway in Berwick to the Princess Freeway in Nar Nar Goon.  This free way will by-pass Beaconsfield, Officer and Pakenham.  Scheduled completion date is 2007/8.  I will try to find out where the on/off ramps will be located.
--Blaab 08:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition to Under Construction
Talk:Forensic ballistics

message: I don't think ballistics is used outside the field of forensic science, so I suggest we merge forensic ballistics to the more commonly used and shorter ballistics to get rid of the unneeded "forensic". - Mgm|(talk) 09:23, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
:Maybe it's just me jumping to conclusions (just about my only form of excercise), but the statement "In the field of forensic science, forensic ballistics is the science of analyzing firearm usage in crimes" added to the statement "I don't think ballistics is used outside the field of forensic science" seems to disreguard the entire body of non-criminal firearms use.  A few articles worth reading are:  handloading, wildcat cartridge, shooting sports, defensive weapon, hunting, military and self defense applications of wound ballistics, sabot, light gas gun, flechette, SCIMTR, .40 S&W, and .45 GAP.  Also see my additional comments at Talk:Ballistics. scot 12:40, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:SESAC

message: I think the article should be under SESAC and not Society of European Authors & Composers as it no longer means that It's only there for historical explanation. Many acronyms have lost their meanings and we don't call them by that and I don't think SESAC should be an exception. --Shimonnyman 09:24, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Location of Article

message: I recently edited this page and got this in my email inbox {edits and comments in curly braces like these}:
Subject: SESAC
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:26:54 -0500
Message-ID: <E62350D4111FD34081903F43AE2AA15302D10667@EXCHANGE1.sesac.com>
Thread-Topic: SESAC
Thread-Index: AcfIsNC+w08C9TV2RdCmYo0dA+Tekg==
From: "{***}" <{***}@SESAC.com>
To: <{my email address from }>
Hi Toby!
Don't know who you are but would appreciate it if you would quit editing
the SESAC / Wikipedia profile.  Your information is incorrect and
editing that page is not really the responsibility of anyone outside of
a SESAC employee.
Thanks!
If you do not wish to receive future commercial e-mail messages from SESAC,
you may send an e-mail message from this address to optout@sesac.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  {bogus, and cut}
I don't know
* if this is a rogue SESAC employee,
* if SESAC is really trying to intimidate people,
* if the people at SESAC just don't understand how Wikipedia works, or
* if this is email is a fake from somebody trying to make SESAC (or this individual) look bad.
But in any case, I know that it's complete garbage.
Note to other editors:
If you get a message like this, you should feel absolutely free to ignore it!
—Toby Bartels 21:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep editing!
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philosophy/COTM

message: This hasn't been updated in forever. Hazillow (talk) 18:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Do we no longer do this?

message: I just noticed that I had set this whole page up in it's own discussion page, rather than on the template page. As a result, there was no page to discuss changes... Damn, now I will need to re-work the links. Banno 20:28, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to correct page

message: Two of the changed rules refer to midnight - Who's midnight? Bet mine comes before yours! We simply don;t need that level of regulation, since there are only a few votes cast each month. Banno 21:07, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Midnight 

message: See rule 4. Setting the philosophy portal as default when no article wins is pointless, since by definition there will not be sufficient people interested to work on it. Banno 20:50, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Default 

message: The voters aren't pledging to work on whichever project wins?
Why not?
Go for it! 07:29, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? And how could you possible enforce it? And why would I want to work on Innate idea  if it possibly won? If folk want to work on a collaboration, they will; if they don;t they won;t, and that's just how Wiki works. Banno 20:25, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaboration of the month 

message: For efficiency and convenience, maybe we should combine our voting areas, such as the collaboration voting page and the Star of Sophia voting page.  We could name the new voting area the Town Hall.  Combining would encourage more participation in the Star of Sophia program, and give it greater visibility at the same time.  And if we came up with any other voting programs, we would have a centralized place to add them.  Go for it! 03:26, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Combine all voting areas into one?

message: I added a tie-breaker policy to the instructions, but there may be better ways of breaking a tie.  Any ideas?  Go for it! 21:10, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Tie breaker

message: Is it not time to declare a winner for January? If we merge the two last nominations, Baudrillard is after all one philosophical biography, this merged suggestion is a clear winner. But this seems to me to be a fairly large undertaking, should we give ourselves February as well for the completion of this task? --Thorsen 13:51, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see no reason that a topic cannot be re-nominated, even if it has already been a collaboration. So if someone wanted to, they could re-nominate the biographies for February, or [[Ethics} or Philosophy. Banno 19:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The candidate collaborations for February and/or March
Talk:Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue

message: That's correct. Merge it. The two are the same.
Actually an analog could be an agonist or an antagonist. It just means the peptide is structured similarly to the original or derived from it. Thus we cannot just "merge" it as identical subjects, but it could be combined.
Considerations:
# A brief analog article leading to separate agonist and antagonist articles.
# A larger comprehensive article incorporating analog, agonist, and antagonist. 
Ekem 23:52, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Section
Talk:TUNE! FM

message: Here are some more old logos that could be used in the article if it gets long enough.
- Gimboid13 18:04, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: More logos

message: Per request, I have merged the history of 2UNE-FM with this page. Ian13/talk 10:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page merge 

message: It's been a long time since I've contributed to this article, but I've done a bit of a tidy up to get it relevant. Anyone still about? --Biggles (talk) 16:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Tidy Up
Talk:Stoughton, Wisconsin

message: I'm not sure that I'd call Stoughton a suburb of Madison.  My view of suburb is that it be more or less directly contiguous to the city's boudaries (like Middleton or Fitchburg are with relationship to Madison).  Stoughton is actually substantially disconnected from Madison, being 30 minutes away and with farmland between the two.
Perhaps hair-splitting, but perhaps not....
Cori.schlegel 10:17, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Suburb?

message: Certainly Per Lysne is certified to be a notable resident by his mention under rosemaling and in his own Wiki page.
Ken L (talk) 23:03, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds reasonable. Go for it. Dmp348 (talk) 23:33, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Famous Residents

message: Pending the writing of the articles about Russ Hellickson and Andy Rein-The United States Olympics team-some sort of citations is needed in the notable persons section of the Stoughton, Wisconsin article. I never heard of these gentlemen before but I am accepting the fact that they are notable.Some sort of citation for the Rein\Hellickson entries is needed pending the writing of the articles.The citations can always be removed once the articles are written.Thank you-RFD (talk) 14:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable persons
Talk:Double-track railway

message: It is known that not all countries have the same set of rules for which side traffic goes for highway and railway. For example, highway traffic moves on the right but railway traffic on the left in China (both Mainland and Taiwan). Can anyone write about which rail to go if there is more than one track?
As regards left/right running in Europe, see here .
:In the U.S., I believe almost all double-track lines are dual-signaled so that there is really no "wrong-way" operation. However, I believe locomotives usually if not always have their control stand on the right side, which would create a preference for right-hand running, since it allows the operator (called "engineer," not "driver," in North America) to more easily see the trackside signs and signals. 76.21.8.213 (talk) 06:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which rail if double track? 

message: This section should mention at the very least which stretch of railway it is talking about, and probably name the companies involved. JPD 12:03, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split ownership 

message: I'm not knowledgeable enough to edit this article myself. But the Amtrak Northeast Corridor line is certainly quadruple track or greater along much of its length. StevenJ81 (talk) 19:40, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There's an article Quadruple track. G-13114 (talk) 20:42, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. But that's probably the single most important example in the US; it's the busiest line in the country by a fair amount. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quadruple Track 
Talk:Turning

message: :The tool's axes of movement may be literally a straight line, or they may be along some set of curves or angles, but they are essentially linear (in the non mathematical sense).
What does this mean? What is the non-mathematical sense of linear? What is the author trying to say? Maybe it could be reworded to be clearer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.138.14.33 (talk) 11:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  non-mathematical sense of linear? 

message: Od turning tool kese kam karta hai 49.14.123.33 (talk) 05:54, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Od turning tool kese kam Karta hai 

message: Not convinced that this definition is entirely clear.  Perhaps the focus  should first be on turning as the process which removes material from a  workpiece as it rotates on a lathe? Derek J Moore (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify further “ remove unneeded material” Derek J Moore (talk) 15:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:32-bit disk access

message: Anyone want me to add a stub on what 32bda really is? Liam Proven 10:35, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  9 Septmeber 2005 

message: Could someone please clarrify the distiction between this and 32-bit Disk Access? The articles as writen do not make this distiction clearly and as result appear redundant. Phatom87 15:40, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed 

message: I have a vague memory that 32 bit disk access was restricted to the swapfile only?  Is that correct?  If so then it is something that this article should certainly mention. CrispMuncher (talk) 21:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swap file only? 

message: We should rename the article to FastDisk since it is more Windows-centric than global like the concept of 32bda. -- TheSola10 (The Mailbox) 09:24, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change
Talk:Laurelhurst, Seattle

message: Why the mention of one visit for a fundraiser by presidential candidate Hillary Clinton? I'd have to guess that most comparably wealthy neighborhoods have received one such visit from some candidate at some time. - Jmabel | Talk 23:49, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clinton