lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yorkville, Toronto

message: "Rents on the upscale Bloor Street West between Yonge Street and Avenue Road have doubled in the last 4 years, ranking as the 22nd most expensive retail location in the world in 2006, up two spots from 2005. Nationally, Vancouver's upscale Robson Street tied with Bloor Street West as the most expensive street in Canada, with an annual average rental price of $208 per square foot. Only four years ago, rents on Bloor Street were almost half that price at $110 per square foot. " 
This is an excerpt from the article I had o remove, because it lacked a verifiable source.  It included a link to the Toronto Star, butthe link was inactive, and no date/article was providedTallrichard2 13:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is a mess. It really needs some editing and cleaning up... I've done some around the 'Transition into high-end shopping district' section, (which I think needs to be retitled), but there's still a lot more. Help please! LOctopus 02:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing 
Talk:Primary texts of Kabbalah

message: Newly created page. Text moved from Kabbalah, with a link/link para from and to that page. Abafied 13:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

message: ::::"...at a later date, create a new texts section for the Kabbalah article." The Kabbalah page doesn't need it; there is a perfectly good intro. to texts on that page and a link to this page. The material on this page was moved out of the main Kab. page last year precisely because that article was too long, was due for splitting and this made a good stand-alone article (which could also be developed in time). It would help to know the history of the move. abafied (talk) 15:32, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal back to Kabbalah page

message: :::On your first factor, Hanina, the opposite holds. Precisely because, in their works, Torah is often quoted chapter and verse by kabbalists, it is obvious that they are using it as a primary source. That is why there should be an explanation on this page. 
:::On the second, the same applies; kabbalists use particular texts/verses of the Torah; they do not "broadly" allude to the Torah. (I refer you to, as just one example, Gikatilla's Sha'arei Orah.) Many did that precisely because they did not want to be seen to drift away from scripture, needing its authority particularly because they were dealing with sod rather than exoteric interpretation.
:::I still say that all this section needs is to be rewritten to make it more relevant, and not translated back to the Kabbalah page. 
:::Even if the current section were to go back to the Kabbalah page (and there is no logical reason why it should) a rewritten section is still needed here.abafied (talk) 10:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Some discussion of Oral Torah should probably be added, perhaps at the top of the article. It the Torah section stays, it should be first, not last. It might be good to have more mention of Oral Torah in the Kabbalah article also. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 12:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Torah
Template talk:UsernameAllowed

message: I have seen this line confuse users more than once:
"However, if you ever wish to do so, it is possible for you to keep your present contributions history under a new name: simply request a new name here following the guidelines on that page, rather than creating a whole new account."
Which I read as "Your name is fine, this is how you change it". By the time a user gets this template they should have already gotten the discussion template which explains how to change your name. I am going to remove this as I see no point in giving instructions that the user does not want to follow and should not have to(if they wanted to change their name they would have done so when they got the discussion or concern template). HighInBC(Need help? Ask me) 13:26, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contrary 

message: The link to the page history did not work for users with spaces in their names (see here for an example). Therefore, I have rewritten the template to link to the RFCN archive instead. Is he back? 15:57, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to page history
Talk:Issachar

message: This article by presenting as if it were fact the idea that a "conquest of Canaan" occurred, with Joshua in command of the Israelite forces, a little after 1200 BC. The scholarly consensus is that no such thing happened. So I am moving the fringe position here to the talk page and I'll make the article reflect the consensus position in the lead. Here's the bit I'm taking out: << after about 1200 BCE,Kitchen, Kenneth A. (2003), On the Reliability of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids, Michigan. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company)()>>. Alephb (talk) 05:24, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The "Tiberian" transcription Yiśśāśḵār with a third <ś> is wrong: the lack of any vowel sign or shva with the second shin is an indication that that second shin is not to be pronounced; as a rule in Tiberian Hebrew letters that are not to be pronounced have no niqqud. Here is the statement from the Academy of the Hebrew language (from its Facebook page 
טוב לדעת כי השם יששכר מופיע במקרא ארבעים ושלוש פעמים. בכולן הוא כתוב בשתי שי"נים, ואולם ניקודו הוא יִשָּׂשכָר – השי"ן השנייה בלא ניקוד כלל. ניקוד זה בא לומר שאין להגות את השי"ן השנייה, כאילו כתוב יִשָּׂכָר בשי"ן אחת וזו ההגייה התקנית.
‍
מקובל לומר שהכתיב בשי"ן כפולה רומז למקור השם: יֵשׁ שָׂכָר, על פי דברי לאה "נָתַן אֱלֹהִים שְׂכָרִי אֲשֶׁר נָתַתִּי שִׁפְחָתִי לְאִישִׁי" (בראשית ל, יח). לקריאה בשׂי"ן אחת ניתנו כמה הסברים – ההסבר הדקדוקי קשור להתלכדות העיצורים הדומים.
‍
השם יששכר מקובל בישראל במיוחד מימי הביניים המאוחרים, ולצד הכתיב המסורתי יש שנהגו לכתוב אותו בשי"ן אחת, ישכר, ובהם דמויות ידועות בעולם הרבני.
(Jan. 22, 2020, at https://www.facebook.com/AcademyOfTheHebrewLanguage/?__tn__=kC-R&eid=ARCsYRULfzezaaWDyEqXh3aUKR1OvJ_-rSTnNIP2AuVKou-g_ruYTVzz1YtMKvdhZ2XN8oAm3iLftYow&hc_ref=ARSjzoXFnN-_p9q4aNr9zsGiP52cdJs5P6hm5Q9-bH0HKJSdMX8aGilgb1Bw4Yd5b5E&fref=nf&__xts__[0]=68.ARBVMvuxFGYmVSmeL_IqdZ7AHsV24pT0zyoTnAJQcqSPuIXFF4Oin-td-ZWTZscQUrqjDJG9opZ2tRn4IUyZxZRTqbsfZUGYC0yQxmSDeAz9gtHKXxmmKALYOSXQJ2HlXYFRbs7oSNSG5_KWe6c83h1JjsH_7J2nP__uGUc_n46hEdwf6yCB45PpXkyAfg6mEADMNKdPWz8bi7Su39B9Gr4fpsHMjCxLaSEIDSsJglq_q6r6GoY9BTXRIP7c-vfFLEd2Kad_1iggcn7suEypZEfmsxEHorcX2k_v0fFtjHewhFEdeffdCDCZl-EnhaEoib9I4qLo-8q_BYxWfW925NQvSA)
Linguistatlunch (talk) 18:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name 

message: In The Song of Deborah it is written “And the princes of Issachar were with Deborah”. It means that Issachar was a name of the place or town.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.192.133.41 (talk) 04:27, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issachar is the place
Talk:1234 (Ronnie Wood album)

message: :Image:1234 (Album).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:46, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:1234 (Album).jpg

message: These latest additions to the article are ridiculously unbiased. I'm reverting straight away.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.254.204.26 (talk) 15:03, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Latest Revisions
Talk:Book of Life

message: Should mention the common Rosh Hashana greeting or blessing... AnonMoos 10:26, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Is there a reason for this section? It seems to me that such a list is completely irrelevant to the article. The words to express my confusion escape me at this time. 24.254.163.150 (talk) 21:25, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Noted Listees" section 

message: I was confused by ספר החיים.  I am very much a beginner at Hebrew, so I may just be confused, but I didn't find ספר החיים in the Hebrew Bible and I didn't find the phrase "Book of Life" in the 3 English translations of the Hebrew Bible that I searched. 
Can anyone help me find these references?  Where is this phrase used in Jewish texts?Jonathan.robie (talk) 22:05, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ספר החיים in the Hebrew Bible? 

message: Perhaps an editor could remove or move the references to the Book of Revelation and Daniel because those books are considered by both Catholics and Protestants as canonical (i.e. non-apocryphal). Perhaps the title/author to this section incorrectly conflates "apocrypha" (non-canonical) with "apocalyptic" (describing catastrophic events). Both the Book of Revelation and Daniel are clearly apocalyptic but not apocryphal. TrueBlueLou (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In apocrypha" section
Talk:Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina/Archive 2

message: I move to merge this article with the article Occupation of Bessarabia by the Soviet Union, since they describe the same events. Some background and other info from this article is not in that article, and could be easily added. The vague suggestion to merge was put forward by someone else (not me) on the other article's talk page. Another editor suggested to cross-reference the two, and he even did that. So, what does it seem more logical to you?:
# to merge this article into that one, and to add there all the info from here that is not present there (and then continue editting that article)
# to keep two articles, but then to say exactly what should go where, how do know a priori whether something belongs here or there
Cast your choice within, let's say, a month (is it too quick?). Thank you.:Dc76 20:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I second the merging of the two articles -- with this one absorbed into the larger one.  I just did some edits on both, and noticed the quite subtantial overlap.  While at it, more references are needed, and further tightening of the exposition (I gave it a shot, but much remains to be done).  Finally, it would be good to have some photographs. Anything available?  Turgidson 01:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging ?
Talk:Another Workout

message: There's a major problem regarding the chronology of Mobley's albums - the infoboxes don't coincide with the discography on Mobley's article. I don't have access to any reliable source for a discography - anyone? Am copying and pasting this on his other album talk pages in the hope that someone gets to see it :) Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 22:25, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology issues
Talk:Van der Capellen Scholengemeenschap

message: Good start page. Wiki does not have a good page in English about a dutch high school. Could this be it? Needs infobox, pics and more topics (the one concerning controversy is good). Talk to me if you need help Victuallers 13:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: assess

message: I have assessed this article down to Stub/Low. The page has nearly no content, and does not qualify for start in my opinion. TheAuthor22  [Talk] 16:32, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2011 Assessment
Talk:Fadl ibn Muhammad

message: El-Fadhl , Rawadidlere  baskin yapmak amaciyla Aras Nehri üzerinde bir köprü inşa etti ve 1030civarinda Hazaralara karşı bir sefer düzenledi. Hazaraların 10000 askerini öldürdüğü bildirildi 188.57.8.55 (talk) 16:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campaign of Fadl ibn Muhammad against the Khazars (1030)
Talk:California Hard

message: Was "Round Midnight" on the original LP?  Don't think so. --ND 01:41, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have the LP but it's not in a very accessible place at the moment.  But I am pretty sure "Round Midnight" wasn't on it. --ND 02:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Qui tam

message: Bearian 17:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Please note:  the correct cite for Vt. Agency of Natural Res. v. United States ex rel. Stevens,  is 529 U.S. 765  NOT 529 U.S. 756 (minor transposition of the page cite).
This law seems not to exist anywhere outside of the United States, yet corruption exists everywhere else if not more so.  I find this hard to accept since laws -- particularly successful ones -- are often copied into other countries.  Can anyone find an explanation? Goatchurch 16:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any way to track the number of hits on a Wikipedia page? I want to see how much attention this article gets in response to the 2-SEP-2009 Pfizer ruling. ShelbyBell (talk) 18:42, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Hit Tracking 

message: I propose that what is accurate about private attorney general be merged here into qui tam, and, possibly, another article be created about the  "Private Attorney General" (usually capitalized) concept used by Sovereign Citizens (also usually capitalized).  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 16:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that no support for the proposal over 2.5 years, I've removed the templates, closing the proposal. Klbrain (talk) 18:29, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private attorney general 
Talk:Diamantina Cocktail

message: Following a discussion here, I am proposing that the band's albums be merged into the article. Either that, or into an article called something like Little River Band Discography. Does anyone have a view on this? TheRetroGuy (talk) 21:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I found reviews of some of these albums on the AllMusicGuide. Given that, and the lack of response to this, I've decided to play safe and keep the articles as they are. I've added links to the reviews on the relevant pages. TheRetroGuy (talk) 18:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merging of albums 
Talk:List of soul musicians

message: Where's Donny Hathaway?
=== Chronological List? ===
IMO, a chronological list will be much more interesting for everyone. A decade wise breakdown of the artists in accordance to their first official release would serve all the purpose of this alphabetic list is serving and more. Any takers?-Unsigned
*I disagree. It's better to have it alphabetical, because it removes the chance of errors and opinions, and it makes it easier for people to find specific names.Spylab (talk) 23:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: IMO, a chronological list will be much more interesting for everyone. A decade wise breakdown of the artists in accordance to their first official release would serve all the purpose of this alphabetic list is serving and more. Any takers?-Unsigned
*I disagree. It's better to have it alphabetical, because it removes the chance of errors and opinions, and it makes it easier for people to find specific names.Spylab (talk) 23:22, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronological List?
Talk:Dippin'

message: There's a major problem regarding the chronology of Mobley's albums - the infoboxes don't coincide with the discography on Mobley's article. I don't have access to any reliable source for a discography - anyone? Am copying and pasting this on his other album talk pages in the hope that someone gets to see it :) Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 22:24, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology issues
Talk:Naftali Herz Imber

message: Imber - an Austrian poet? That's how far political correctness has come? I'm sure he'd get an Austrian passport today, but does that make him an "Austrian poet"? Btw, he'd also easily get a Polish, Ukrainian, Russian, or of course an Israeli one. Not sure if he had a US passport already, that might be a bit more tricky if he didn't. So back to square one: Austrian, really? Arminden (talk) 00:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  LOL 
Talk:Lumen Field

message: So it says this was the first NFL stadium to use fieldturf artificial surface. Ford Field (Detroit Lions) has also always used Fieldturf and it opened the same year in 2002.
Now maybe Lumen Field technically opened a few weeks earlier so it still was first but as written, it is confusing. 2600:1700:BF32:8ED0:B90A:EE96:9DD0:6AF4 (talk) 21:59, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fieldturf in nfl 

message: I noticed that the stadium bonds were supposed to be retired in 2021, but there seems to be no sources for it when it occurred besides an opinion piece in The Seattle Times by the Public Stadium Authority chair and the Seahawks vice chair. Would the opinion piece be acceptable to use since it was co-written by the PSA chair, or is that off-limits? In any case, only the date (January 1, 2021) would be used from the source itself. SmartAn01 (talk) 07:08, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of bond payment completion 

message: Regarding recent attempts to replace the main infobox photo: while I understand that the current photo may be a bit too outdated and low-resolution for some people's liking, the reality of the situation is that it is still the best "free" image in terms of showcasing the interior of the whole stadium. That said, I think the photo's description is inaccurate as to when it was taken; the main issue is that the tower has the "Seahawks Stadium" signage instead of the "Qwest Field" signage, which was already installed (as seen on September 11, 2004, via Getty Images) by the time this photo was supposedly taken (April 2005). On Flickr, I also found an exact copy posted by the same uploader with an earlier date (February 2005), but still later than the photo on Getty Images, so I think the description should be corrected with this in mind.
Still, considering the low resolution of the photo, I think a new, higher-resolution version of it is needed. The "free" photo I could find on Flickr that most closely matches the panorama-like view of it is this one by , but I feel that too much of the field below is cut off to be a suitable replacement. I would like to coordinate on some potential guidelines for a replacement photo in case anyone here has the opportunity to capture one if they visit the stadium in the near future. SmartAn01 (talk) 00:15, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction to, potential replacement of main infobox photo 

message: For future article development, a source re: public art:
*https://stadium.org/public-benefits/public-art/
---Another Believer (Talk) 00:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source re: public art
Talk:From Here to Infinity

message: I rated this album, and I must comment about it. Kudos to anyone who's been working on this article. It's pretty good in my opinion. If you simply add in a personnel section, I can reassess the article to a C class and also run through the criteria for B class. If anyone wants to do so, send me a message on my talk page. Citybuild122 (talk) 22:48, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding the album project rating
Talk:Carmindy

message: It would be nice to include her real name, and perhaps how she made up her stage name.
:What the hell is her last name? --HollywoodHeart 02:31, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article seems biased toward selling her book (or promoting her career).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.200.177.10 (talk) 17:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: Picture added 2009-09-01 Researchcreative (talk) 06:00, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Did she lose her studio? In the newer episodes of What Not To Wear, she does her makeup in a Sephora store, rather than in a makeup studio. It looks really bad. Sailorknightwing (talk) 17:50, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Studio? 
Talk:Heroin chic

message: They seem to be poor choices. E.g. Denise Richards does not seem to have any darkness under her eyes. Am I just a dumb guy who can't tell? Feel like there are better examples ----  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.39.190 (talk) 19:34, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: There was a claim with refrence that heroin's purity grew and this caused easier insufflation.  This claim is persistant, however; a review of the sources reveals that:
a) there is no evidence other than parroted claims that literaly form a circular chain of refrences that occasionaly deadend to someon ewho said such without citation, and
b) that it makes no sense since heroin bioavailability is similar via insufflation and IV injection and area under the curve and peak plasma levels (corrected for morphine production) are also similar.
The metrics for IV vs insufflation are so similar it defies logic to claim that purity had anything to do with the drug's administration prefrence.  http://books.google.com/books?id=AUTWJwn8uOwC&pg=PA337&lpg=PA337&dq=insufflated+heroin+bioavailability&source=web&ots=PR-qR5UAwQ&sig=hunwsXKn0wMA6inGEcXZkrQgpuE&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=4&ct=result
Anyways, the source cited previously, as usual, gave no citation to any evidence, experimental, testimonial, analytical, nothing, demonstrating its accuracy or source.  I removed that claim and replaced it with the well-documented claim that heroin became more potent and that more people began snorting it.
Personally I think its clear that as heroin grew in popularity more people began using it.  Since most people don't like injecting htemselves for no reason, and the internet grew, people realized there was not a great deal of reasons to inject and instead insufflated.  Additionaly, the rise of powdery dry heroin made snorting easier then with tar forms which generally require disolution and snorting of the supernatent liquid.  I don't have sources for these guesses so I simply ignored them, but I wanted to explain the change and provide evidence the authority cited's claim is senseless and reveal that investigation demonstrates the snorting related to purity trend was entirely made up.  Just a case of correleation leading to improved causation and nothing more.  Dea reports of "OMG teens are using heroin and snorting it... and its different cuz its more pure now!!!11" probably facilitated this.--24.29.234.88 (talk) 05:53, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heroin insufflation and purity
Talk:I've Got My Own Album to Do

message: The Jagger/Richards composition "Sure the One You Need" is believed to be the only song from a Stones solo album performed by the Rolling Stones in concert (at least twice, once in 1975-06-08 County Stadium, Milwaukee, WI, US). My source for this trivia is highly unreliable, so I'm leaving it here. If better sourcing can be found, this could also be worth a mention in the Jagger/Richards article. / edg ☺ ☭ 14:39, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sure the One You Need"
Talk:Hair wax

message: Would it be possible to add an image to this article of either the hair wax product itself or a person who has had their hair styled with hair wax?  I've never actually seen the product itself or (knowingly) seen a person who has had their hair styled with hair wax, but I've always been curious.—Mears man 05:34, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a small pot of wax image to the article. └and-rew┘┌talk┐ 03:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I edited this article to state that you should use a double boiler rather than a "metal apparatus", simply because it is damn dangerous to heat wax over an open flame just in a normal pot, if someone wants to edit this to be more generic go ahead, i just don't want anyone doing anything stupid because "wiki told them to" --UltraMagnus (talk) 08:37, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  double boiler