lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Battle of Mogadishu (November 2007)

message: according to our article, an insurgent is one who takes part in an uprising against established authority. Since Somalia has no government this is impossible. The linked news articles do nothing to clarify whose side the militia is on, or whether the people who dragged the ethiopian soldiers through the streets are associated with any organization or militia.
Wouldn't the Ethiopians be fighting the militia either way? Whose side is anyone on? Are citizens simply shooting Ethiopian soldiers by popular consensus? (That would not be an insurgency.) How do these clearly civilian casualties imply a battle has occurred?
My limited understanding of Somalia is that the most powerful organizations there are fundamentalist Islamic, anathema to neighboring powers and the Somalian public. So the interests of Ethiopia are best served by preventing anyone from organizing at all. Killing any civilian who seems likely to obtain power isn't really a battle or a war or an occupation... maybe it's just an oppression? Potatoswatter 18:30, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[insurgent]]?

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:32, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Bersih

message: Anybody that wants to help me write this article is more than encouraged to do so. I am new on Wikipedia so there is lots I don't know how to do and lots I don't know that I am supposed to do. For instance I don't know how I am expected to reference my articles. I never was any good at referencing my essays, even when I was a student. The other thing with which I CLEARLY need help is translating the names of Organizations from BM to English. I have tried the best I can but I know I am miles from the mark with some of them. Ryan Albrey 18:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oude Maas

message: Is 'Old Meuse' an acknowledged name for this river in the English language or not?
The article is called 'Oude Maas' (the Dutch name), which suggests there is no official (or informally acknowledged) English name for the river, and suggests that the translation 'old Meuse' in the body of the article is given purely as an informative translation. However in the info block on the right, 'Old Meuse' is listed as 'other name'. I would suggest clarifying that the phrase 'old Meuse' in the info block on the right is nót an other name, but purely a translation of the name. Maybe by putting it in quotes or cursive text? Greetings RagingR2 (talk) 09:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is 'Old Meuse' an acknowledged name for this river?
Talk:Afgedamde Maas

message: The wording of some of this is misleading or just plain wrong.  There are also major omissions that totally change the meaning of things.  First, there is no talk about that fact that the Afgedamde Maas was not only damned off at its southern end, but that it's seperated/controlled from the Waal/Boven Merwede by the Wilhelminasluis in Andel.  Secondly, while there is mention made of the damming off of the river from the Maas immediately less of Well, there is no mention of the construction of the river being connected back to the Maas/Bergse Maas via the Heusden Canal, nor is there mention of the Kromme Nolkering flood lock to prevent high water on the river.  In that same vein, that makes the part about the Afgedamde Maas receiving no water from the Maas a bit debatable.  Maybe it should be reversed to say that the Afgedamde Maas flows into the Maas instead or in addition to?  
Because as the article is currently written, it makes it sound like the Afgedamde Maas 1. Flows directly into the Waal/Boven Merwede without any opposition, when it's clearly damned to keep it seperate from that river, and 2. makes it sound like the Afgedamde Maas is completely seperate of the Maas/Bergse Maas since it doesn't mention the Heusdan Canal connection.  Thoughts? --Criticalthinker (talk) 07:34, 25 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistencies
Talk:Cheerleader Nation

message: I think there's an error in the article. -- 132.203.54.41 (talk) 01:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can someone have a GPA higher than 4.0??? 
Talk:Mostefa Ben Boulaïd

message: Dear Wikid 77, It seems we were both editing this page at the same time. When I went to save, and there was an edit conflict, I thought I had done something wrong (because I had been doing a lot of previewing back and forth) and had just hit a snag so I copied and pasted my version. I want to apologise and to say please revert to your version if you would like to. Again, most sorry, Myrtle. (I left this message at your talk as well) Myrtlegroggins (talk) 10:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit conflict

message: Hi everyone. I'm going to put this article in order. And, so that the details don't get bogged down in edit summaries, I'm going to detail my work here:
* ✅ Correcting layout flaws.
* ✅ One of the links seemed to be a fairly reliable source, albeit in French, so I moved it from external links to references.
* ✅ I removed the unsupported allegation of election fraud (cit. needed since 2012), replacing it with a more neutral one I found in one of the sources.
* ✅ I erased the remaining external links because they were broken or too indirectly related to the subject of the article.
* ✅ I've left my own cit. needed tag where I couldn't find RS except for one that unfortunately looks like it was based on this wiki page itself.
* ✅ I finally removed the verification tag.
 Colaheed777 (talk) 14:53, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification
Talk:Pekka-Eric Auvinen

message: This article should be kept instead of being merged into the main article. Other school shooters that killed less than him have articles. it really stinks, though. Kitia'' 18:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a valid reason for spinning this off to its own page. Merge tagged. - Ageekgal 19:06, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

text: This article is a useless copy-paste mess (with even cite errors) and Auvinen and his writings are not notable outside the Jokela school shooting connection. There is not so much information about Auvinen on the main article that it would need to be moved here, neither is there so much information about Auvinen available anywhere that we could have a proper biography on him. And when you move content or duplicate it like this you make the reader have to browse through two articles instead of one, which is a Bad Thing. There is also a copyright (GFDL) problem, since you just copy-pasted other people's work without attribution. If you want to suggest a separate article, you should do so at Talk:Jokela school shooting. Prolog 19:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Everything what is worth writing about him is related to the shooting. There is not enough information to write an own article (without copypasting..). And all that information is needed in the main article. You received resistance, but you still had to create this article? Seung-Hui Cho is very different, it has broad psychological examinations and silly trivia information about everything, such as the writings. Thus, that information can't be fitted to Virginia Tech massacre.  --Pudeo⺮ 22:00, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Okay, maybe him. But what about Charles Carl Roberts IV or Duane Morrison? Kitia'' 22:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They seem useless too. Anyway, other articles shouldn't be taken into consideration unless it's Wikipedia policy. I already explained my revert in the edit summary. Keep your eye on Talk:Jokela school shooting#The gunman's article. If people think creating this article is necessary, then let's do it. Also, beware of WP:3RR, you have reverted the article three times during 24 hours. --Pudeo⺮ 00:21, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Okay, I'll change it tomorrow. Anyway, I am a strict follower of Wikipedia:Ignore all rules. Beside, I don't much care because many other peple who didn't do it in school but killed less than 9 people. Oh, and Cho's article is waaaaaaay too long, because I'm sure this guy had mental problems. It just isn't reported. Cho's case was only reported because he killed 32 people. Kitia'' 00:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And by the way, why do most of the Columbine victims get their own articles? Kitia'' 00:31, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Finnish officials deal these very differently. Even the names of the victims won't be published (except principal because widely known). Don't except to get anything new to write about Pekka-Eric Auvinen. --Pudeo⺮ 00:59, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Trust me, we will. Kitia'' 02:00, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Discussion (Reopened)
Template talk:England-actor-stub

message: Add a border to the flag? 212.84.100.97 (talk) 08:34, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag border 

message: Subsitute current code with the following for a flag image that includes a boreder.

mk:Шаблон:Англија-глумец-никулец
ro:Format:Ciot-actor-Anglia

212.84.96.92 (talk) 06:32, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Although, the border is rather feint. --Stickee (talk) 06:39, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 212.84.96.92, 4 August 2010
Talk:CRY1

message: Hello. The link named CRY1 near the top of this article (in the box) doesn't work. Does anyone plan on fixing this?--Mumia-w-18 19:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks AndrewGNF for fixing the link, but I still wonder how long it will be before anyone responds on this talk page. Are any humans watching this bot-created article?--Mumia-w-18 19:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  yes. AndrewGNF 19:51, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Great, so the system seems to work.--Mumia-w-18 20:27, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link
Talk:Infant mental health

message: I plan to discuss important tenets of infant mental health work, as they are presented by Zero to Three.
A problem of discussing IMH is that readers tend to think this means "crazy babies"-- i.e., "mental health" really means "mental illness". In fact, the focus is on how to encourage good development. Any suggestions about ways to clarify this will be welcome. Jean Mercer 19:01, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plan
Talk:Maria Aurora von Königsmarck

message: Just a note: In Sweden, she is known as Aurora Königsmarck, not Maria Aurora of Königsmarck. I don't know if this new title of correct. But perhaps the "of" is better in English, i dont know the rules about that. I just thought i should mention it!--85.226.235.164 19:02, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles name should be changed to Aurora of Königsmarck. She only used the name Aurora in real life, she did not use Maria; at least, she is commonly known in Swedish history only by the name Aurora.--85.226.44.201 (talk) 11:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Marion Parker (version 2)

message: * Agree, merge with E Hickman.Paste 19:03, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this page looks like it was copied and pasted from Marian Parker, I've merged the changes here back into that article and redirected. None of the sources explain the spelling discrepancy, so I've guessed. The other article has a longer edit history, and that was my primary reason for putting the redirect here. I don't think it should be switched unless an authoritative source is found for the correct spelling. – jaksmata 13:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

text: After researching, I've concluded that the correct spelling is Marion.  It's on her grave, and in most of the newspapers of the time. The songs and some newspapers seem to have it misspelled. – jaksmata 19:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Bakwana Kgosidintsi Kgari

message: This website says he died in 1977.. --Milowent • talkblp-r 15:57, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't find anything more official, but ruler.org is reliable. Added it to the article. --Banana (talk) 06:50, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still alive?
Talk:Gastric chief cell

message: these cells produce pepsins, which is essential for the digestion of proteins in our stomach
parietal cell is not make gastrin, but G-cell producing it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.204.75.23 (talk) 04:58, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure gastric chief cells produce chymosin? In humans or in ruminants?--Miguelferig (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but when it is expressed needs to be cleared up as you described.   Gsibbel 22:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I study zymogenic cells, gastric metaplasia, and a few other things related to this system so I plan on fixing up this and other articles.  I'm currently writing a review and will be applying that information and future discoveries to the pages in the next few weeks/months/years. Gsibbel talk 22:37, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fogging (censorship)

message: Tokyu-meguro-sta-platform.jpg|Image currently used in article. Editing (never mind censorship) is barely visible at the width used in the article, 300 px.
Naked in the streets - American censured.jpg|Censored nudity. Censorship is visible at the width used in the article.
Jimmy Savile 2006 (cropped).jpg|Image with background face censored. Demonstrates a practical use of this technique.
Abu Ghraib 70.jpg|Nude image with face censored. Demonstrates how invasive images released in the public interest can be censored to protect privacy.
מפקדי המ"מ.jpg|Image where censorship is prominent even in very small thumbnails.
 The image you added (the first image in the gallery) is not a good demonstration of the subject, because in the thumbnail, you can barely tell that the image has been edited at all. The second image in the gallery is one I happened to be looking at before coming here. The remaining images provide good demonstrations of image censorship in a variety of situations. There are also many other good images to choose from. Brianjd (talk) 10:57, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought about it a bit more, and realised that image 2 is probably censored to protect the viewer, while the other four images are censored to protect the subjects. Image 4 could also have the breasts (or at least nipples) censored, and would then be censored to protect both the subject and the viewer. This distinction is not clearly explained in the article. Brianjd (talk) 11:20, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I was about to suggest this article for Wikipedia:WikiProject Journalism, but on closer inspection, this article has a clear (and unexplained) focus on filmmaking. Brianjd (talk) 11:25, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image thumbnail: Censorship is not visible
Category talk:East Sussex geography stubs

message: There are fast approaching 200 stubs, just for geography in East Sussex! Many of these are wasteful, since they should be included in an article on the civil parish, of which they are a part; or they are all those written about the Hastings town wards. The Wiki article here is a very useful tool, since it makes clear what could be included. I am beginning a project to reduce them. Peter Shearan (talk) 15:36, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its down to 118 and I apologise for recently creating a load more stubs. It was probably under 100 for a while. MortimerCat (talk) 21:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Far too many!!
Talk:2007 Warwickshire warehouse fire

message: This article should not be called 'Atherstone fire' Atherstone is a town in North Warwickshire, fire crews from which attended the blaze. Atherstone on Stour is a Hamlet which is south Warwickshire. Therfore for the article to be accurate it needs to be called Atherstone on Stour fire. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.128.123 (talk • contribs) 14:10, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The article indicates that they appeared at Wolverhampton Crown Court, though that is not mentioned in the reference. The BBC article indicates that the case is proceeding in Stafford Crown Court. Can anyone clarify if Wolverhampton was for an initial appearance then the rest was at Stafford or is Wolverhampton incorrect? Keith D (talk) 16:35, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: My fault sorry, i thought it said Wolverhampton yesterday, i'll change it now. Gavbadger (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Court
Talk:The Hardmans' House

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 14:48, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:A34 Road Bridge

message: I personally think this needs renaming and reclassification - there must be dozens of road bridges over the A34, so this article would be better integrated into another article, say Oxford or Oxford Ring Road. Oxfordmale (talk) 18:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Mojavemyinae

message: After poking around a bit, I can find no evidence that this grouping has ever been used as a family.  Korth and Chaney (1999) named it as a subfamily of uncertain familial assignment (either Heteromyidae or Geomyidae), and the paper has barely been cited since.  The one citation I can find, , refers Mojavemys to Geomyidae without even a subfamily assignment. I'm happy to move the page to Mojavemyinae, but I wanted to give a bit of warning first and also raise the possibility of removing the group from the rodent template. Helioseus (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll concur with the move.  What family will it be in then?  Geomyidae?  Incertae sedis? --Aranae (talk) 22:50, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Geomyidae looks like the best option, maybe "?Geomyidae".  McKenna and Bell had both genera (Mojavemys and Phelosaccomys) in Geomyidae, and adding in the Feranec et al article, the recent consensus favors it.  I'll make the move and add an explanation of the issue to the text. Helioseus (talk) 23:24, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  --Aranae (talk) 23:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a full family
Talk:Ab Kettleby

message: I have removed the following section:
Near the village pond, surrounded by orange-coloured ironstone cottages indicative of the area. Traditionally, it provided a good supply and never ran dry. After the construction of new houses nearby in 1992 the well dried up, but by 2001 was flowing copiously again. Unfortunately in 2001 a metal grating was fitted that blocks all access to the water. The present well structure is a truncated pyramid just over a yard high and surmounted by what at first glance appears to be an upturned font but was probably a previous basin for the well.
...Which appears to be a direct copy and paste from the following website, with no references/citations or any form of attribution  http://www.megalithic.co.uk/article.php?sid=10223
Rushton2010 (talk) 11:46, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation? 
Talk:Abberton, Worcestershire

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:16, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: - is not a city. City  project  removed. Worcs project added.--Kudpung (talk) 13:10, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Abberton
Talk:Abbess End

message: The article now has a commons category and an image, but although the image shows the environs of Abbess End, it does not show the main buildings in the hamlet itself. Therefore I have not removed the reqphoto template. Storye book (talk) 17:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Hi. When checking this page, i could not find any significant mentions anywhere. The current article is based upon a map (not enough to establish gng as per recent discussion), plus a historic england listing for Rookwood Hall which doesn't mention Abbess End (just Abbess Roding) and a BHO extract from s book on Essex with no mention of Abbess End, again just Roding. I cannot find any document online showing it is a legally recognised place as per WP:GEOLAND, and even a search on the local district council does not pick up End, just roding. A further search via books on google and a general search picks up zilch (other than usual listing fir businesses nearby). The only detail we have is a wikidata page about a roman road at Abbess Road, which itself states is not listed on the map (and I could not find any mention online). I propose to move the article to a section on Abbess Roding and redirect this page to there, as it does not meet GEOLAND Legally recognised place nor does it meet GNG. Davidstewartharvey (talk) 14:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I think we could merge with Abbess Roding, its pretty much part of the village of Abbess Roding and until that parish was abolished it was part of it. Its only legally recognized in the sense of being an OS settlement which may not pass GEOLAND. Normally we merge to parish but given it seems to be somewhat part of Abbess Roding village and was part of that parish it may be better to merge there. Crouch, Swale (talk)  19:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Abbess Roding and redirect
Talk:Abbess Roding

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 02:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled