lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lockheed LC-130

message: how does the plane land on normal airstrips if it﻿ only has giant ice skates?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.140.22.251 (talk) 06:13, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Look closely at the picture of the nosewheel ski; you will see the wheels are still there, protruding thru the flexible ski structure. Raymondwinn (talk) 11:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: landing

message: You removed an edit I made this afternoon (I wasn’t logged in at the time) from the LC-130 page. The plane is there, it is visible in satellite images of the airport, and I can send you a picture of it taken this afternoon if needed. It’s the only LC-130 on display and I’d like to get that info back on the page. Atd413 (talk) 04:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Atd413, and thank you for your interest in this topic. I am very sympathetic to your edit. However, unfortunately there is no WP:RELIABLE on which to base it. If you live nearby, taking a picture of the aircraft would be a good way to include it in the article. BTW, the Pima Air & Space Museum has a ski-equipped C-130D on display. This could be mentioned in the article. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 16:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have pictures from yesterday. So if pictures are added can the “aircraft on display” section be restored? That’s one of the first things I look for on most aircraft pages and it has proven very helpful. Also I have been to the Pima museum and don’t recall seeing a ski equipped C-130, it may be a recent addition or it may be stored at the boneyard adjacent to the museum at Davis Monthan AFB. I’m not sure if that info would belong on a page specific to the LC-130 or not.  Atd413 (talk) 22:18, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Atd413, I provided you with the  to the Pima A&S Museum ski-equipped C-130D link, above. That link can be the basis for listing said aircraft with a reference. You would still need a link to list the aircraft in question in text, but if you include a photograph, you can just state the pertinent facts in the caption. HopsonRoad (talk) 23:43, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  LC-130
Talk:June Singer

message: I have added a link to this article from the William Blake article.--WickerGuy (talk) 23:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added a link 

message: The section titled Biography was not a biography.  I have retitled it "Bibliography."  I hope that is correct.  If not, please change it to something more appropriate.
I hope to find some bio info and to recreate the "Biography."  Will check thru the history to confirm that such info has not been deleted.  Rags (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  not bio 

message: Probably the two most important interpreters of Jung in the USA are June Singer and Edward Edinger. I'm surprised there is not an article on the latter.--WickerGuy (talk) 02:26, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should also have article on Edward Edinger
Talk:Wessex Regiment

message: Hello, I am a former member of the 2nd Bn The Wessex Regiment (1982-1990). I am in touch with many other former member of the Unit, some of whom have a solid historical personal knowledge of the Wessex Regiment (including key Regimental personalities, where to find additional resources, and dates/locations of key events). I believe this could be a significant positive addition to the page, but would not want to proceed without permission from the originator. Please contact me at alberthead62@gmail.com to discuss. Many thanks.
--Anglo-Saxon5936 (talk) 15:12, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for stepping forward. No permissions are needed at Wikipedia – if you have suitable written/online sources, please go ahead. --Wire723 (talk) 09:39, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volunteering to help improve the page with additional and more complete information.
Talk:ADSL loop extender

message: The chart doesn't explain what the numbers on the bottom stand for......????Rvannatta (talk) 04:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: "Ask the commissioner in your state" - what if I don't live in a state ? WarKosign (talk) 09:16, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too USA-specific 
Talk:Dowisetrepla

message: * Should the article include what Dowisetrepla is an abbreviation for? I've been deleting it every time someone adds it back because it ruins the final punch line of the episode, but some people clearly think it belongs in the article because they keep adding it back. So, are we completely accurate at the expense of a joke, or do we leave something for readers to learn from watching the episode? Sailor Psychic (talk) 04:39, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What Dowisetrepla means

message: Does the new appartment's floor seem slanted in this episode, a fact that Marshal and Lily discover in No Tomorrow ?
FiP Что вы думаете? 08:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Slanted floor

message: Robin doesn't claim Mt. Waddington to be the tallest mountain, she just says that it is "like" the tallest mountain. Most of the extremely tall mountains are up in the Yukon and aren't exactly fit for ski resorts. Not really an error, because of the word "like." For example, "Oh, it's like, the best restaurant in the city!" "You're WRONG! A look at critical reviews and surveys taken over the last twenty years will reveal that..." See my point, it was a generalized statement, not a fact. Remove.
You're wrong, she didn't say that it is "like" the tallest moutain, she just say that it is the tallest mountain in Canada, then she says that it's "like" 4,000 meters high.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.216.16.191 (talk) 14:21, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors
Talk:Zeitgeist: The Movie

message: I came here a little while back after seeing the film and was astounded (then) at the ideas made up about the film on this page. I came back today and was even more astounded given the vast range of POV and extremely biased sourcing. How do any of you people rationalize the constant vandalism ( which is what it really is ) of this page, knowing that Joseph's film has nothing to do with "New World Order", is entirely not anti-semetic no matter the uber fringe claims and at no time does anything in the film that says "bankers manipulate world events". Can any of you editors here, not referencing right wing hate press full of pure POV, actually defend any of these ideas as sourced in the film itself? Seriously, please show me in the film where any of this stuff is stated. The script is here: http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/Zeitgeist,%20The%20Movie-%20Companion%20Guide%20PDF.pdf
Also, what is the story with the constant "conspiracy" theory references in the opening, which, again, is pure POV. Zeitgeist The Movie reports historical events as per the view of the author. Putting the "conspiracy label" only insults.  Also, the term "conspiracy theorist" is now common known as a pejorative. It is just like a racist term today. I hope other more mindful people can help bring some honestly here as this is likely the worst, most misrepresented article on Wikipedia. SweetGirlLove (talk) 10:39, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Any opinions of the film should be expressed in the Reception section - not the opening. I have clean it up as the POV was absurd SweetGirlLove (talk) 09:53, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is going on with this page? POV, False Claims, Biased sourcing... 

message: I have started a discussion at the reliable sources noticeboard concerning The Third Estate and News One.--The Devil's Advocate tlk. cntrb. 17:25, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  RSN discussion
Wikipedia talk:Featured articles in other languages/Italian

message: San Galgano exists as Galgano Guidotti--T. Anthony (talk) 04:51, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Nunzio Ortolano and Caligero Palermo are actually stubs on the Italian Wikipedia, see it:Nunzio Ortolano and it:Caligero Palermo </br>
Questa voce sugli argomenti... è solo un abbozzo. means This article about ... is a stub Zidanie5 (talk) 18:57, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stubs
Talk:Land Forces of the National People's Army

message: :de:Liste_der_Technik_und_Bewaffnung_der_NVAXx236 (talk) 11:37, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Equipment

message: Reference [5] (tank-net) is bad link. Have not removed as not familiar with wiki edit procedures. 51.7.196.130 (talk) 08:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference for NVA false flag unit bad
Talk:Bassaricyon

message: The May 2011 issue of National Geographic had some information on Olingos and their relationship with Ochroma trees. If I get around to doing it I'll add a mention to the info, but someone else could probably do a better job. The2crowrox (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Geographic 

message: Please see Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mammals#Olingos_and_Olinguito for upcoming changes to this article. UtherSRG (talk) 04:32, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming changes 

message: Olinguito article is separate. I guess this page should be for the Olingo only, with a redirect from Bassaricyon?  Fluorescences (talk) 14:32, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, as per WP:COMMONNAME. What are some counter-arguments for that change? If there are none, this page title should eventually be moved to Olingo. CodemWiki (talk) 22:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:FAUNA also agrees. CodemWiki (talk) 14:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is for the genus. There are 4 articles for the 4 species. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:54, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change page title? 
Talk:Valentyn Rechmedin

message: *...that Valentyn Rechmedin, a Ukrainian journalist and writer, received the Order of the Red Star after the World War II? - article by ; nom by --Riurik(discuss) 04:59, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it for next update by now, although if you think something should be included, don't hesitate to make the change yourself and make a note of it on the talk page.  I try to keep the dyk's fairly short to increase the chances of selection, but one word would not have hurt.--Riurik(discuss) 03:57, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested for dyk 
Talk:Candyman (slasher)

message: Please do not remove "Speedy" tags until an admin has reviewed the article.  If you wish to dispute the tag, the process is described on the tag itself.  If you have any questions, please come to my talk page. Bielle (talk) 05:14, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

message: The tag shows you how to challenge the "Speedy Delete" using the template "hangon". That is a better option than continually reverting the tag, which may be construed as vandalism. Bielle (talk) 05:38, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute process
Talk:Charles II, Count of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen

message: There is a bit more information on the German page. I was unsure how to translate, and if that information would be relevant. Also, I decided to put him under his Anglicized name, instead of the German "Karl." Naming conventions are a bit vague. Redirect him to something else that would be more appropriate. 
Also, I've listed him as both Prince and Count. Again, I'm not sure which is correct, and so I leave it up to those who know better than I.
Trjumpet (talk) 05:29, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comment
Talk:Donald C. Wurster

message: I'm pulling the "Second Korean War" entry on LT.Gen. Wurster's bio.  Why? 1. The designation of KW2 as a war is disputed (by me and others); 2. No other general officer bio'ed in Wikipedia has KW2 listed on the bio (exception -- Bonesteel, who's article I already cleaned up.) 3.  No official bio of ANY general officer has such a listing. 4.  While Wurster was a pilot in ROK when the ax murder incident occurred, there is no indication that I can find which puts him in combat, much less on a combat air patrol, when the events unfolded. 5. These four reasons should be enough justification.--S. Rich 14:12, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: second korean war deletion
Talk:McDonald's Premium line

message: I saw the HTML tag, but the article was created 3 weeks ago and wikipedia shouldn't be a placeholder forever; I don't see why you didn't just wait until you had something to put in it to create it with one sentence. The construction template would be more appropriate than an HTML template as well, as it let's the public know the article isn't just junk without having to edit the article. Thanks TheHYPO (talk) 05:50, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Status?

message: You really have it out for this article don't you? --- Jeremy (talk) 17:24, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod
Talk:Crotalus intermedius

message: Does anyone know who Johann Wilhelm Müller was?  It was in his scientific publication that Troschel's original description of Crotalus intermedius appeared.
Was Johann Wilhelm the son of German herpetologist Johannes Peter Müller (1801-1858)?  Or was he related to Swiss herpetologist Fritz Müller (1834-1895), or to German herpetologist Lorenz Müller (1868-1953)?  Or was he not related to any of them?
Would he merit his own WP article?  Was there a Müller herpetological dynasty which could be another WP article?
96.236.213.217 (talk) 18:46, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  JOHANN WILHELM Müller ???
Talk:Crotalus oreganus abyssus

message: The mention of north-central Arizona appears to be correct.  Found one that was roadkill on Arizona SR-88 (renumbered as 188 since) and it had the gray background, same color as the chip seal the highway department had laid on the road some months before.  The markings were closer to the 'diamonds' of the western diamondback but unlike those were more disjunct from each other.  This sighting was in August 1968 about 1/2 mile northwest from the town of Roosevelt as it existed then (what is known as Roosevelt now did not exist then).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:506:5901:BDCF:B8F6:B540:4F2F (talk) 02:29, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

message: Can someone discuss the potency of the venom?  Jokem (talk) 04:15, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venom
Talk:Crotalus cerberus

message: The picture on the article itself, while not showing the snake very prominently, does show the color accurately of darker Arizona Black Rattlesnakes.  
In 1971 near Roosevelt and Roosevelt Dam, Arizona, we came across a green with yellow one which may have been a lighter one, yet without a picture of lighter snakes I can't tell if that one was an Arizona Black or not.  A week later one was killed on SR 88 (now 188) at 'Stewart's Cove', halfway between Roosevelt and the SRP housing area,  by a car after it came to warm itself on the pavement.  That one was not melanistic, although the area around the diamonds was gray, so it may have been one of this species as well.  
We killed one in the Roosevelt Dam Salt River Project housing camp by the second house from the SE on the bottom row of houses (visible in Google Maps) shortly thereafter, and this one was as black as they get.  That one had also come out to get warmth from the pavement.
One was killed at a summer camp for the disabled on Mingus Mountain that same year, I was there when camp personnel came across the snake.  This one was as dark as the one at the SRP housing camp.  This gives credence to the 'type location' for these snakes, although my description of the area I've seen them in was southeast of that by some distance.
      
None of these had the 'coontail' markings we saw on other brownish/tan snakes in the area, came across a pale rose-colored snake with that tail marking several miles west of the dam, so this may have been a significant concentration of the black ones at the time that we saw several from.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.57.84.205 (talk) 04:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be a nice addition to this article to comment on the venom.   Jokem (talk) 04:16, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venom
Talk:Dansyl chloride

message: I'd like to move this page to Dansyl and include the dansyl chloride, dansyl amide, dansyl cadaverin, etc.  neffk (talk) 16:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we could have both a dansyl article on the group, and this article on what I think is the most common derivative. Tim Vickers (talk) 16:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

text: It seems to me that there would be a lot of overlap between these two derivatives---mainly because they have such similar photophysics.  Perhaps, instead of trying to keep multiple copies of the information accurate and up-to-date, we could have one article with a section for each derivative.  And the appropriate re-directs could be made from dansyl amide and dansyl chloride pages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neffk (talk • contribs) 14:30, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Redundancy isn't really a problem, as we aren't short of space. You could put the general information that applies to all these compounds in the dansyl article, and then have sub-articles on each compound, with the standard table of physical properties, ID numbers etc. Tim Vickers (talk) 15:07, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I'm not concerned about space.  I'm concerned about keeping multiple copies in sync.  But the solution you outlined above would be fine with me. neffk (talk) 17:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I don't think that will be a problem in practice, as there is very little editing of these articles - in fact you're the first person to make any significant changes since I created the dansyl chloride article back in 2007! Tim Vickers (talk) 17:30, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Derivatives

message: I could also add the UV/Vis spectra for some derivatives, along with extinction coefficients.  I have spent some time looking for this type of information on the web and couldn't find it---at least, not easily.    neffk (talk) 16:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spectra
Talk:Crotalus concolor

message: I have never ever seen this species called "yellow rattlesnake" anywhere. This species is universally known as the midget faded rattlesnake in herpetological circles, including textbooks, journals and fieldguides. That includes the SSAR's standard list of English and Scientific names of North American reptiles. https://ssarherps.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/HC_39_7thEd.pdf
I would challenge anyone to find a publication that calls this the yellow rattlesnake.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Caissaca (talk • contribs) 22:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictitious common name
Talk:Crotalus helleri

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 21:44, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Crotalus helleri →  – Reflects actual scientific name listed on ITIS. – The current agreed upon scientific name for this species is Crotalus oreganus helleri, not Crotalus helleri. This is listed on the Integrated Taxonomic Information System: https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=683065#null. ITIS reports the use of Crotalus helleri to be invalid: https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=209542#null. This accurately reflects that it is a subspecies. This name is also used by major government groups like FWS: https://www.fws.gov/species/southern-pacific-rattlesnake-crotalus-oreganus-helleri as well as field guides. Crotalus helleri should instead redirect to Crotalus oreganus helleri rather than the other way around. Hotdogsyrup (talk) 20:52, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 May 2023
Talk:Current diagnostic criteria for bipolar disorder

message: These diagnostic criteria would be more useful in the articles on the respective episodes/disorders than in an article of its own.  Steve CarlsonTalk 06:37, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split/Merge

message: The American Psychiatric Association has not released its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders into public domain, but claims copyright. The Wikimedia Foundation has received a letter of complaint (Ticket:2010030910040817, for those with access) about the use of their diagnostic criteria in this and a number of other articles. Currently, this content is blanked pending investigation, which will last approximately one week. Please feel free to provide input at the copyright problems board listing during that time. Individuals with access to the books would be particularly welcome in helping to conduct the investigation. Assistance developing a plan to prevent misuse of the APA's material on Wikipedia projects would also be welcome. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:53, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reviewed other articles that are part of this complaint, and have fixed the problems that I found, but this one is beyond repair: as far as I can seel, almost all of this article's content is taken from the DSM. If I had seen this article before this process started, I would have tagged it for speedy deletion as a copyright violation. I don't know if I can tag it now that this other process has started, so I'll just leave this comment here. Eubulides (talk) 20:30, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your work here! Since we're waiting for further word from our legal counsel, it doesn't hurt to keep it until that resolves. (I should note, though, that I agree that this one is particularly extensive.) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:31, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Mike Godwin suggests handling through typical processes pending further action. Given the extensiveness of this issue, I have deleted and created a redirect pending production of new clean. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problems with diagnostic criteria
Category talk:Agriculture in New Zealand

message: If we put all the general articles in the categories for every country, then every general article ("agriculture") will be in a thousand categories. Let's keep this to articles exlusive to New Zealand, please. If you want to look at all the agriculture articles, check out the Agriculture Category. OptimistBen (talk) 07:36, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed all the articles that were not relevant. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 14:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles Exclusive to New Zealand
Talk:Berkeley Hundred

message: "Berkeley Plantation" soon therafter became the traditional home of the Harrisons.
Mark in Historic Triangle of Virginia (talk) 07:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification

message: Is there any evidence that it was named for the person rather than the place (or indeed the original hundred) in Gloucestershire?  It would be odd to name it for just one of the founders, rather than the place or area where most of them came from.Mhockey (talk) 19:44, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name 

message: Berkeley Plantation and Berkeley Hundred both currently state that they are two names for the same property. The following link on page 642 appears to suggest that the Berkeley Plantation was part of the Berkeley Hundred:
:
-Location (talk) 05:09, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: For future reference

message: Is there any truth to the statement that there were hereditary white slaves there? (Most Slaves In America Were White – Political Vel Craft) 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:45F6:4D03:37DF:C696 (talk) 16:32, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  White slaves