lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Railway lines in the West Midlands

message: R-B-S in the commuter line section?
It is part of the WCML so should be mainline surely?
Worley-d 00:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree so change it. Simply south 00:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added the original operating name of this railway to the disused section - the old Midland Railway route from Wolverhampton to Walsall via Wednesfield as confusingly it was known when open as the Walsall - Wolverhampton Line.  Unfortunately it's a different animal to the current line of that name, so it doesn't match all the other lines in name. Hope that's OK with everyone! Fingerpuppet 17:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wolverhampton and Walsall Railway

message: Editors may be interested in the debate currently ongoing at Template talk:Railway lines in South-East England over the layout, classification and geographical scope of these templates. Pickle 16:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout and standards of these templates

message: test (minus cats) Pickle 17:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me. My only concern about v-d-e is that it contravenes Wikipedia:Avoid self-references, but the practice is wide-spread so I don't think it should be a problem. – Tivedshambo (talk) 17:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good point, I'm not sure if there is a way around it, or whether it falls within the exceptions at Wikipedia:Avoid self-references or if its a good case for WP:IAR. I like v-d-e, as you can get at them to edit them and you can "hide" it if you don't want it in the way. Pickle 19:07, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see the previous template had an "edit" facility anyway, so you haven't made it worse. Incidentally, I prefer it centre-justified, but that's just my personal view. – Tivedshambo (talk) 19:13, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ohh right, on that, i think the "v-d-e" or "edit" are vital to make Wikipedia editable by anyone, the whole purpose of this site. On the alignment, I'm somewhat undecided as to what works, but it was left align before so I'm trying not to rock the boat too much. Pickle 23:22, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work - I like the new version.  I would say that I prefer the left-aligned version, though. Fingerpuppet 08:52, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  v-d-e version
Talk:Herbert Benjamin Edwardes

message: Hello, have carried out some minor edits and also added further proper refs and citations. If its ok, please, am now also removing the template reg more refs on the article. This is a bit of an ongoing work and look forward to returning to it, and others like this. Thanks, regs, 
Khani100 (talk) 21:24, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor edits etc 

message: If anyone can help adding the sources to the edits properly,thanks.  Added sources are in the references. 2A02:C7C:2C9B:8D00:F8BE:68E4:228E:AF7E (talk) 16:52, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing from reference
Talk:Se Cathedral

message: I made an error in the edit summary when deleting a pic. I should have written: It's São Caetano. Amandajm (talk) 11:24, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Catherine/São Caetano 

message: "is the largest church in India..." but according to Basilica of Our Lady of Dolours basilica is the biggest and tallest church in Asia. Aotearoa (talk) 20:37, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  is the largest church in India... 

message: * The name of the article should be Se Cathedral. This is the name by which the cathedral is known (even though it is meaningless because it combines a Portuguese and an English word). Search for 'cathedral of Goa' in Google, and 90% of the results will give this name. WP:TITLES states plainly Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources.
* The name in Portuguese is Sé Catedral de Santa Catarina. See pt:Sé Catedral de Santa Catarina.
* The name in English is 'Cathedral of St. Catherine'. See [this usage on the official website
* The title 'Sé Cathedral of Santa Catarina' is inappropriate because it is two Portuguese nouns connected by an English conjunction.
* Take for example Sagrada Familia. The official name of the basilica in the local language, Catalan is Basílica i Temple Expiatori de la Sagrada Família, but this is not used and also note that the accented i is not used in the title.
* The official name of Se Cathedral would be the Konkani name because Konkani is the local language, the official language of the state and the official language of the archdiocese. I'm not sure what the correct spelling is, I will look it up, but for now I'm going to use Sant Katerinachi Katedral.
The Discoverer (talk) 14:26, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the article
Talk:George Hirst

message: I suppose Record breaking season means 1906 yet it's 2nd paragraph deals with 1907-8. Perhaps that could be headed 1907-1908.
I put in links to the seasons (3) but Sarastro1 reverted them (& 3 others that I have restored). I think the season wikilinks provide context & links within them to the stats. They could be easily applied to the other seasons in other paragraphs. Any consensus on this? DadaNeem (talk) 00:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've no problem with the links, but I think we must then link ALL the seasons. My preference is to link none, but I'm not strongly attached to either way. If you want to do so, go for it (I haven't the patience for it!) but for consistency we can't have just one section. I've renamed the section; it's better not to lead with a number in a title section which it says somewhere in the MoS. Sarastro1 (talk) 17:24, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Record breaking season''' section & other observations
Talk:SafeCatch

message: I read about this in the news and couldn't find too much information about it. Please help by adding more information that would be helpful. Chinese3126 00:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand the Article

message: The notability tag was added without any contextual information or comment here on talk. The article has three unique sources from notable publications; perhaps the tagger could provide more specific guidance as to what exactly is missing? Anchoress 23:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a Google search which reported "about 61 hits". Then I did another one which got 1400+ hits. Now I just did one again which is returning "67 for Safecatch". I don't quite understand what's going on with that. Ewlyahoocom 01:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, that's weird. But either way, we don't use raw google numbers to establish or discount notability. Anchoress 04:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's why the tag reads "...please expand or rewrite the article to establish its notability." Ewlyahoocom 07:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you please be a bit more specific? Could you identify what's missing? Thanks for reiterating the content of the tag, but that doesn't really answer my question. Thanks a lot! Anchoress 07:53, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the external links is dead but a Google news search lists a single article at http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/valleyindependent/teenscene/s_530174.html So how long has it been since this... concept? program? (I'm not actually sure what it is) was developed? 1 year according to Wikipedia, but 2 years according to that Google news article -- are there any studies documenting its results (besides Carr's self-reported results)? It's says it's a Washington State program -- does it have an official website? (One other thing -- is it "Safecatch" or "SafeCatch" with an uppercase C)? Ewlyahoocom 08:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability tag?

message: Why is the article titled "SafeCatch"? None of the references have a medial capital C. Languagehat (talk) 16:24, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Credit Union Management article uses it. I'm not sure which is correct, though. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:41, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Bill Bowes

message: I'd be happy to help but Bowes was a shocking coach and somewhere Don Mosey wrote about it in respect of D Pickles. He wrote well but was insufficiently analytical of the Yorkshire pantomime and traded in received wisdom. Express Deliveries is, along with Fowler and PM Walker, by miles the best player autobiography - in my view.
:OK, see your talk page. Have to go now. 109.157.252.60 (talk) 10:07, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. IPs can be very misleading. I see my current IP geolocates to Lancashire (gulp!) and even if it manages to hit Yorkshire it is usually Wakefield, a good 75 minutes drive away. Sometimes it is Leeds which at least is on a direct railway route! Jack | talk page 12:56, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  happy 

message: Bowes in his autobiography gives next to no info about his family, other than a bit about his dad being a railwayman. Does anyone know anything about his wife and kids, like their names for example?? Thanks. Jack | talk page 18:22, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Bowes' wife was called Esme. Named here. There's a pic of her and him, with a son, in the YP picture archives. Johnlp (talk) 21:12, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's some OR for you. Mrs Bowes was Kathleen Esme May Staines, she was born in Harrow and they married in NW London in 1933; non-OR note above suggests she was known as Esme. Two children William Anthony J Bowes, born 1935, generally known as Tony Bowes, second eleven cricket for Yorkshire in Minor Counties/Second eleven competition in 1959, long-time player for Lidget Green in Bradford League and organiser of Bradford school cricket competitions. Daughter Vera A E Bowes born 1939. You should be able to "back-research" at least Tony Bowes: there are Bradford and Ilkley newspaper cuttings on t'internet that identify him as Bill Bowes' son. Johnlp (talk) 23:44, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Brilliant. Thanks very much, John. I had figured that this chap might be Bill's son, given surname and Yorkshire connection plus the compatible date range, but as you can see CA provide very little info on him. Esme was a niece of the Beaumont family whom Bill lived with in Pinner during his MCC ground staff years; the Beaumonts were friends of his parents. I found this wedding day photo.Jack | talk page 04:46, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal details
Talk:Hermann Goldschmidt

message: Hi, I am confused as to the date of his death:
* This article states August 30, 1860  and his obituary here states as well 
* This website states September 17  and the Jewish Encylopedia 
* Main article currently states April 26? (no ref)
Therefore I have changed to August 30.
Thanks --Golan's mom (talk) 12:53, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death unclear (different dates on different sources)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronics/Assessment

message: The log section says it cannot be transcluded because of its extreme size.  In fact, it is an empty page!  Wikiproject electronics is not that big, and the assesment changes over 30 days are minuscule (in this case non-existent) so that is a pretty silly statement to have on the page.  Does anyone know what bot is responsible for this by the way?  There should be a link to it in case it(s owner) needs to be contacted. SpinningSpark 16:53, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Log section 

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection before December 2008, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 16:15, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Electronic 

message: I have found an article to which the stub rating does not apply. Hybrid coupler is an extended redirect to Power dividers and directional couplers. The goal of writing it as an extended redirect instead of a standard redirect seems to be to provide citations that prove that hybrid couplers really are a form of directional coupler. I suggest a new step on the quality scale be created.
Option 1: a specific step for this situation. "ERD" is an extended redirect or disambiguation page, which provides references to other pages together with citations proving the relevance of the destination pages.
Option 2: a more general grade. "S" is a satisfactory article which, due to the unusual nature of the article, is naturally short.
--Jc3s5h (talk) 15:23, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stubs
Talk:Hermano Pule

message: I'm attempting a rewrite of this article.  Much of the original information was highly biased and contained factual errors. Viriditas (talk) 12:26, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Many refer to Hermano Pule as Hermano Puli. What is the real and official one? Vekou (talk) 03:49, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it "Pule" or "Puli"? 
Talk:Kansas v. Colorado

message: I have temporarily restored the copyright problem template placed here and removed here, pending clarification. It may be that this material is public domain, and not Duke Law's own summary of the case, but I have not yet been able to verify that. Since there was no explanation for the removal tag, I do not know if copying is not a concern for some other reason and have requested feedback. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:17, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright concerns

message: This article is miscategorized as Internal territorial disputes of the United States. This dispute does not involve a territorial dispute, but it does concern riparian rights and water usage. Someone correctly identified this earliers as Water case law.
Rustbelt Maps (talk) 15:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Category problem

message: In the 1943 section, bullet points 2 and 3 seem amiss. Is it something that needs to be fixed? If so, how? Dgndenver (talk) 13:29, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does this mean?
Talk:World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson

message: What major errors or weaknesses does it have.  It's been tagged this way for over four years but no one has stepped up to the plate and said why, so should the template be removed?  75.252.174.236 (talk) 20:29, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I am removing the banner. It's now been 11 years of nothing, and I see no glaring problems. Paisarepa (talk) 02:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this article need expert attention?
Talk:Hezekiah Spruill

message: Could this be Joseph Spruill?   Joseph is the only soldier that I could find in J.D. Lewis's database of Rev War Veterans with this rank. Tyrrell County Regiment
05:35, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Military Service
Talk:Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States

message: The above discussion seems to indicate that the current name is probably not the appropriate name for this article. What should it be changed to, though? I suppose the options are Mormon Church v. United States or Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States, or perhaps even Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints v. United States . Or am I misreading things? Good Ol’factory (talk) 21:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name revisited

message: Per the discussion above, I'm proposing that this page be moved to Mormon Church v. United States. To summarize, this name would reflect the most commonly-used name for this Supreme Court case and the name that the court itself has used to refer to it. An alternate option would be Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United States, which would at least reflect how the full name of the case was written in the law reports. I would also note that the article was originally at Mormon Church v. United States before it was moved to the current name. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you read the discussion above? That's where the rationale for "Mormon Church v. United States" is explained, and it has nothing really to do with the fact that's that where it was at. Good Ol’factory (talk) 01:32, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Ken Barrington

message: He was a talented and significant cricketer, but 16,000 words seems to rank as TL:DR.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.113.183.55 (talk) 14:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I will have a go at hacking it back. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

text: I have cut 3,000+ words. It is still too long, but it will have to do for now.   Gog the Mild (talk) 23:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much information
Talk:Lake Washington Boulevard

message: I seriously doubt either that "Lake Washington Boulevard was a favorite hang-out of Kurt Cobain" or   that the anniversary of his death is marked by flowers being left "on the bench he would sit on". After Nirvana's success, Cobain bought a house on Lake Washington Boulevard (but, other than his own house, I don't think it was ever a "hang-out": insofar as he "hung out", it tended to be nearer the center of town. The bench in question is presumably one in Viretta Park, immediately south of what was the Cobain/Love property. Again, I doubt Cobain spent much time on the park bench. - Jmabel | Talk 00:22, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cobain
Talk:Hiram Page

message: The last sentence of the fourth paragraph in this article says:
"Later, the stone was ground to powder and the revelations purportedly received through it were burned."
According to John P. Walker, in Dale Morgan on Early Mormonism, on page 13, while Dale was at the RLDS library in 1947, he and RLDS library research assistant S.A. Burgess, "examined the Hiram Page seerstone"
So maybe the stone was not destroyed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:2548:B200:FD8A:7930:4D6B:E66D (talk) 17:50, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

message: This page is in the category "People excommunicated by the Church of Christ (Latter Day Saints)" but there appears to be no evidence that Page was actually excommunicated. At the time of the revelation/seerstone kerfuffle, he agreed to cease his revelations and was not otherwise disciplined. When he left the church in 1838, no action seems to have been taken against him. There is no mention of it on the Joseph Smith Papers biographical entry for him. And in the thesis "Hiram Page: An Historical and Sociological Analysis of an Early Mormon Prototype" the author states explicitly that there is no such evidence (p. 57).
--RockRockOn (talk) 01:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there any evidence that Page was excommunicated?
Talk:Peter May (cricketer)

message: It seems that May applied for entry to Balliol, but was rejected because he was a public schoolboy and good at games, both of which categories the Master AD (Lord) Lindsay found objectionable. Can anyone provide a source reference? Seadowns (talk) 13:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rejection for Balliol College 

message: This picture
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Peter_May.jpg
is captioned
Peter May cracks another on-drive . . .
but it looks like no on-drive I have seen or can imagine.
86.135.129.55 (talk) 23:11, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shot selection
Talk:Hiram Walker

message: Doesn't the distillery, which still operates, deserve its own article? - TheMightyQuill (talk) 02:04, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article for the distillery 

message: I just adjusted all the footnotes to follow punctuation, abiding Chicago style. --Kek926 (talk) 07:14, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnotes 

message: I have combined duplicate footnotes it has bought the number down from 138 to 85 removing (53 duplicates) and removing 16k of duplicated citation text. -- PBS (talk) 08:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combined duplicate footnotes
Talk:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney – Trials and Tribulations

message: A move request discussion involving this page is currently taking place here. Axem Titanium (talk) 18:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Hong Tianguifu

message: This article states in the sidebar that he died in 1864 at age 14 but the main text says he died in 1984 at age 16. Nothingbutthegirls (talk) 14:52, 16 January 2012‎ </span> Comment moved from Hong Tianguifu prefix:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/, jonkerz ♠talk 14:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved comment 

message: How could this be the picture of Hong Tianguifu? Look at his hat! That was not seen then. Besides, cameras were rarely heard of then, too！Request sources to prove the picture's  veracity.--Aronlee90 (talk) 01:54, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious Picture
Talk:Author (disambiguation)

message: I've removed deletion message after rewriting the page to be more of a disambiguation page than a dictionary definition. Here's what I did:
* Some purely definitional info was removed.
* Literary related info were moved to author. 
* The remaining info now links to yet to be created specific topic pages.
Hope this now meets the requirements for a disambiguation page better. It now requires people with specialised knowledge to create the specific topic pages. honeydew 00:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hooker Jim

message: I have a few questions regarding his name: 1. On the photograph included in the article, his name is spelled "Hooka", not "Hooker", which one is correct? 2. Is it not known who gave him that name and why? And if it is known, why isn't it mentioned in the article? And 3. What about his real (Indian) name? Is that unknown? Billy7 (talk) 02:07, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name