Talk:Jesus/Archive 66

message: Ok. I was just going to say that though there is a lot to go into this page, obviously, some minor details are being overlooked because of all this foolish obsessing over the larger. A large basis for faith is the firm belief in what one cannot confirm, but clearly the several accounts of Jesus, the Four Gospels of Canon, are in agreeance for the most part regarding His life and ministry, so it is certainly right to site that the sources for much of this page ARE drawn from Christian Tradition. However, as for the small things, several pages capitalise "He" in reference to God, and Christ as well in certain articles. Either this needs to be 'fixed' or the main article on the Man needs to be altered to match. Also, Jesus was risen, by modern standards, TWO days after He was interred; three was reference to the Jewish calender at the time. Also, as far as pictures go, they are completely unnecessary, but if you must have them, make sure they all display a variety of perspectives, especially considering none of us know what Jesus looked like, nor will we (or ... at least, i don't think we will). [MrLigit was responsible for this section. I wasn't signed in at the time this was created]
===Interred===
Buried means squashed under layers of earth or least permanently placed underground.
Interred means placed in a crypt or tomb.Certainly the corpse was interred (placed in THE tomb) on a TEMPORARY BASIS ONLY.  Please fix.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.233.107.29 (talk • contribs) .
Oh, sorry for my poor grammar! You see, it was pretty late, i believe, when i wrote this. I don't know as if i would necessarily say that "buried" has but a singular definition and is incorrect to use here, but for the sake of killing an insignificant conflict, i will change it. [MrLigit]
:Buried also can have a sub-definition meaning "interred". We had an extensive debate over this issue. Homestarmy 05:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we can verify a great deal about the subject through external writing (and signed sponsorship deals) through authors and publications that do meet our notability criterea. Ronabop 04:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I have a funny feeling that this "notability concern" is nothing but horseapples on purpose. To say that Jesus is not notable cannot be said without qualificiation. For anything remotely like it, it would have to be more of a statement of someone or some groups interpretation of Jesus. :-) אמר Steve Caruso (desk/poll) 12:46, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, and think the 'notability concern' can be taken with a grain of salt. Wesley 16:43, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments about the Current Article

message: Buried means squashed under layers of earth or least permanently placed underground.
Interred means placed in a crypt or tomb.Certainly the corpse was interred (placed in THE tomb) on a TEMPORARY BASIS ONLY.  Please fix.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.233.107.29 (talk • contribs) .
Oh, sorry for my poor grammar! You see, it was pretty late, i believe, when i wrote this. I don't know as if i would necessarily say that "buried" has but a singular definition and is incorrect to use here, but for the sake of killing an insignificant conflict, i will change it. [MrLigit]
:Buried also can have a sub-definition meaning "interred". We had an extensive debate over this issue. Homestarmy 05:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Interred

message: Jesus Christ is not in my opinion notable enough to have his own wikipage. hes never written a book or signed a sponsorship deal. Thats why I suggest merging this article with one on faith healers.
:Well, we can verify a great deal about the subject through external writing (and signed sponsorship deals) through authors and publications that do meet our notability criterea. Ronabop 04:51, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a funny feeling that this "notability concern" is nothing but horseapples on purpose. To say that Jesus is not notable cannot be said without qualificiation. For anything remotely like it, it would have to be more of a statement of someone or some groups interpretation of Jesus. :-) אמר Steve Caruso (desk/poll) 12:46, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, and think the 'notability concern' can be taken with a grain of salt. Wesley 16:43, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability concern