lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rum Rebellion

message: Early versions of this article seem to be taken from http://www.eurekatimes.net/1808-rum_rebellion.htm but wihout acknowledgement :-( --A  Y  Arktos 01:55, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ive got a live recording I made in Sydney by an Australian Bush/Punk/Folk/Rock band Skew-Whiff in a Rocks hotel back in the 80's. Sometime I might dig it out of storage and describe it here. What are the laws on sound bites and lyrics? how small does it have to be to be fit for purpose intended. There is almost zero google presence (they were popular in 1985) but i have a card with logo and possibly some video as well. moza 05:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a bit more hunting, it turns out the name is Skewiff and theres a pic at   http://www.kmc.nsw.gov.au/images/Picture_0541.jpg article about them playin at Australia Day 2006 here and about Alex Cronin here and a contact for the past performance at bushdance@scog.asn.au 'Now in its 13th year, this year’s Mardi Gras BushDance will feature live band Skewiff'. So whatever, maybe they are available to contribute something to this article. 'Dave Kennedy's band ‘Skewiff’' performed, webpage 
here or pdf here. enjoy.moza 12:36, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rum Rebellion Musical performance recording 

message: This article was vandalised on 27 September 2006 and footnotes were deleted and they were not restored until 2 February 2007.--Grahamec 03:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: *With anniversary coming up - there are a few articles in the press appearing eg
**http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/coup-paved-the-way/2008/01/22/1200764260583.html
--Matilda talk 00:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  200th anniversary coming up 

message: Hi,
reading this it's apparent that while recent works by Dufffy et al are being included some very old and outdated references are being cited, especially from the 1920s. Also, no mention is made of the derivation of the term 'rum rebellion'. I havent got time to start changes but flagging that I think these are necessary. 
(Scott E Hill (talk) 02:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  revising content and references 

message: I'm removed the sentence:
 "However, imprisoning people and threatening to do the same to the court when they failed to rule in favor of said authority was extremely legally problematic, and the rulings in the subsequent trials clearly prove that the contemporary British legal authorities disagreed with the assessment that MacArthur's complaints were unreasonable based on the clemency granted and their explicit characterization of his behavior in office." 
Apart from being expressed obscurely, it had no verification and appeared to be a mere statement of the contributor's opinion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sir rupert orangepeel (talk • contribs) 23:13, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Causes
Talk:Scott Raynor

message: take a look at this you godamn idiots http://www.absolutepunk.net/showthread.php?t=32568
this has all the TRUE info you need and not some false made up bullshit you'll see on blink's website   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antoccc (talk • contribs) 00:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: morons

message: should he be credited with the drums when travis barker re-recorded the songs for the CD
RE: yes, since he wrote the part along with the others. 24.17.48.11 (talk) 16:03, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: 
well the quote is whom, you can't change a quote, that is why it is a quote...and the sic is just to show it wasn't a typing error, that it is, in fact, grammatically incorrect from the quote...
=== Bio ===
His bio greatly contradicts many of the other pages related to Blink-182, such as the bands page. Most other sources say that Mark and Tom had been playing before they brought on Scott, but this page disagrees. Perhaps sources for either of them could be added?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.195.209.17 (talk) 04:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blink Greatest Hits 

message: His bio greatly contradicts many of the other pages related to Blink-182, such as the bands page. Most other sources say that Mark and Tom had been playing before they brought on Scott, but this page disagrees. Perhaps sources for either of them could be added?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.195.209.17 (talk) 04:05, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio
Talk:Rosenheim

message: The attack on 18 April 1945 cannot have involved "around 200 to 1300 aircraft". The number must be known with greater precision. Given the size of the town I would guess it would be approximately 200 aircraft only.203.80.61.102 (talk) 03:30, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: *I have corrected my translation from German. I must have misread Bomben when I did the translation years ago. The German translates to something like 'around 200 aircraft dropped around 1300 bombs...'Lkingscott (talk) 15:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  18 April 1945 air attack
Talk:Courtney Walsh

message: They look so much alike that they could be twins! 72.152.135.75 (talk) 00:32, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is that Spike Lee in the image? 

message: We all know that he’s Jamaican, and probably Afro-Jamaican, but does he have any Chinese origins? I’m asking simply because his brother is a famous Jamaican-American DJ, Walshy Fire, and he considered as a Chinese-Jamaican, (or how we say in Jamaica: Chiney). But I haven’t found any information that Courtney Walsh is a Chinese-Jamaican, which is complicated to me. Do they share only one parent? But if they do, then why it’s not written anywhere that Walshy Fire is half Afro-Jamaican, half Chinese-Jamaican? 
Though it’s all complicated, I think that theory about different parents is the most transparent, cause Walshy Fire looks black, but I’ll repeat: it’s not written anywhere that Walshy Fire has any African heritage, neither it’s written anywhere that Courtney Walsh has any Asian heritage.
 
What do you guys think about it? Do y’all know something about it? Write it down if you do, cause I’m really curious about that stuff. 2.133.213.47 (talk) 20:38, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Courtney Walsh of Chinese heritage?
Talk:Rahul Dravid

message: A lot of content missing citation and that's why I tagged it. THE NEW ImmortalWizard(chat) 22:30, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 

message: Rahul Dravid's height is wrong. He is much taller than 1.70 m.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.113.159.78 (talk) 14:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 

message: Rahul Dravid is taller than 1.70 m Zahidtaniv2017 (talk) 14:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:03, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2019 

message: Rahul Dravid and his wife Vijeta Pendharkar both are Karhade Brahmins and not the Deshastha Brahmins as mentioned 122.171.237.104 (talk) 05:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 06:05, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 November 2021 

message: Both Rahul Dravid and his wife Vijeta Pendharkar are Karhade brahmins and not Deshastha brahmins as mentioned on the page Varsha318 (talk) 06:05, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karhade and not Deshastha
Talk:Bat

message: It says: "Insectivorous bats may eat over 120 percent of their body weight, while frugivorous bats may eat over twice their weight.". 
It stands to reason that a bat must have eaten at least 100% of its body-weight over the course of its lifetime. But this statistic is meaningless without saying what the timescale is. I presume it's per day, but I don't have access to the cited source.
Can someone with access to the source fix it?
MrDemeanour (talk) 14:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much they eat 

message: Change "Most of the oldest known bat fossils were already very similar to modern microbats, such as Archaeopteropus (32 million years ago)." to "Most of the oldest known bat fossils were already very similar to modern microbats, such as Archaeopteropus (32 million years ago). The oldest known bat fossil is the Icaronycteris gunnelli (52 million years ago). The two sets of fossils were discovered in Wyoming." AAAAAA14 (talk) 13:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Actualcpscm (talk) 14:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

text: done Ktkvtsh (talk) 01:49, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Ktkvtsh (talk) 01:56, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 June 2023 

message: The Thermoregulation subheading specifically cites Nowack, J.; Stawski, C.; Geiser, F. (2017)  in the first sentence as the source for information about the differential nature of heterothermy between bats. Whilst this citation is useful in the general context it doesn't specifically address this question at all, instead focusing on broadening our concept of the reasons for torpor instead!
A more appropriate source would instead be Stawski, Willis, & Geiser, 2014  which has a table (Table 1) that summarises thermal physiology of bats by family. Skeletorfw (talk) 11:52, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: ; added the source you suggested. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potentially incorrect citation about heterothermy.
Talk:Sancho I of Portugal

message: Is Sanctius the English translation of Sancho? - Gameiro 02:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never ever encountered Sancho rendered as Sanctius. I've never encountered anyone named Sanctius, or even heard of the (presumably) Latin word sanctius, which is very close to sanctus ("holy"). It has the ring of the bogus about it. Unless references can be provided of the Portuguese name "Sancho" being rendered "Sanctius" in English, I will delete the article reference to Sanctius altogether. --Iacobus (talk) 03:28, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted.--Iacobus (talk) 00:08, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sancho equals Sanctius? 

message: According to the main page of Afonso Henriques, Sancho is listed as being the second (legitimate) son of Afonso Henriques (the first being Henrique in 1147), although he is the fifth natural son if you include the three illegitimate sons born before Henrique. LeeAlanWright 06:43, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Sancho the third or second legitimate son of Afonso Henriques? 

message: Acording to this site this is true... I wonder if there is anyone here whom has knowledge about this. Acidburn24m 21:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Sancho I of Portugal a decadent of prophet Muhammad
Talk:Naomi Klein

message: Hi. Small point that doesn't require all the following explanation, but here goes anyway. According to the guidelines at WP:RSPRIMARY you can cite another encyclopedia. But also according to MOS:LEAD the lead can be free of citations for non-controversial facts, especially ones that are supported by citations in the body. So it all comes down to WHY the IP editor wants the citation. They mentioned Klein's date of birth. I assume that is supported in the body, but haven't verified that yet. A previous editor had removed the middle initial "A" which was not supported by the encyclopedia citation that you removed. So I currently support your removal of the citation, but disagree with your reason, and should an editor want to use it to support some fact I would support that. I hope this makes sense. Cheers.DolyaIskrina (talk) 15:36, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Citing Encyclopedias

message: NOTE: See also Naomi Wolf talk.
The "Not to be Confused with Naomi Wolf" hatnote is a joke, and does not belong in this article. Sure, some people allegedly confused the two on Twitter (the premise of Klein's 2023 book), but that does not justify the inclusion of that tag: it's mentioned in the section discussing the book, and that's sufficient. Shankar Sivarajan (talk) 22:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. The only reason not to provide clarification and disambiguation is if it is somehow tendentious. Like if you were to say "John Doe" is not to be confused with "Party Clown". You are implying that John is a clown. Here however there is no pejorative I can think of. Klein certainly doesn't seem to have a problem with the association being called out. Until Klein's book came out, I myself had confused them. DolyaIskrina (talk) 02:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objections to mentioning this confusion in the lede. I only heard of either of these people because of this supposed confusability. Shankar Sivarajan (talk) 03:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

text: I support including the note. I have confused them myself, and Klein has written extensively about the confusion. cagliost (talk) 12:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Not to be Confused with …" hatnote is a joke
Talk:Cambridge, New Zealand

message: This needs more information.
:Molinari
I know right it's not gd a all  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.238.122.192 (talk) 21:22, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Cambridge School issue is pretty controiversial in the region - but this article presents just one side of the case. It needs a more objective view. Grutness 09:53, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  School issue 

message: Removed and revised reference to Catherine as a Princess.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keenas99 (talk • contribs) 07:39, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Sport

message: Is there a reason for having so little about Leamington (Cambridge West)? If I change that, would it go better here as a sub heading of History, as a separate article, or what? Johnragla (talk) 20:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leamington
Talk:Robert Merle

message: "Recreating the French 16th and 17th century..." isn't good English.  Does he recreate the French of this period, or the France?
: Molinari
Erm yes - you're right - I think I culled a sentence relating to the language (he writes the box in period French) and got it confused... Off to correct it :D
MarkBoydell
: Quote: "he went so far as to write it in the period's French making it virtually untranslatable"
: Says who?  Does that mean other works from the 16th and 17th century like Shakespeare and Molière are "virtually untranslatable"?  --Stéphane Charette (talk) 04:45, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a distinct recollection of a British edition of "The Day of the Dolphin" (It must have been around the time of the film) which managed to omit all quote-marks, yet was full of direct speech by characters. Maybe he just suffered from bad translators?Zhochaka (talk) 22:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This poem is marked as published at 1952, but according to Great Soviet Encyclopedia it was published at 1953. What date is right? 13:33, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  La mort est mon métier (Death is my Trade) 

message: That is not true. I read the Fortune de France series in Hungarian, it is popular in Hungary and I don't think that is a unique case. Maybe a french author is not marketable in English, and it is easier to say that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.132.185.3 (talk) 09:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...making it virtually untranslatable... 

message: http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/aug/16/historical-epic-by-frances-hilary-mantel-crosses-the-channel-robert-merle  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delira (talk • contribs) 07:58, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finally published in English. 
Talk:Invader Zim

message: Draft:Dark Harvest (Invader Zim) is now in drafts 92.236.253.249 (talk) (talk) 23:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark harvest   

message: === "Moosey fate" listed at Redirects for discussion ===
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Moosey fate and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 28#Moosey fate until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: October 28 RFDs

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Moosey fate and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 28#Moosey fate until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Moosey fate" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Seargeant Slab Rankle and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 28#Seargeant Slab Rankle until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:13, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Seargeant Slab Rankle" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Swollen eyeball and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 28#Swollen eyeball until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:26, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Swollen eyeball" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Swolen eyeball and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 28#Swolen eyeball until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 14:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Swolen eyeball" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Vortian prisoner 777 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 28#Vortian prisoner 777 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 16:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Vortian prisoner 777" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:SpongeBob SquarePants (character)

message: Should the Spongebob character article should begin with "SpongeRobert "Spongebob" Squarepants". I don't think the name SpongeRobert is as common as other characters' full names. I think I have seen other characters articles without their full names at the start. NatwonTSG2 (talk) 23:21, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  SpongeRobert 

message: Why was the image of SpongeBob in the infobox changed? The previous image had a non-free use rationale, yet one editor claimed it wasn't licensed. TarantulaTM (speak with me) (my legacy) 05:47, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Non-free use rationales are for unlicensed files. They can be used, per WP:NFCC, only when there is no available free replacement. Nickelodeon released some clips from SpongeBob under a CC-BY license on YouTube, and screenshots from these clips can be used for the character, so such an image must be used and there is no rationale under WP:NFCC for the use of an unlicensed image. (This picture is from a montage of characters shown in the clip, but there are other frames you could use too.) D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 00:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a terrible idea. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 08:08, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I want to read the discussion you linked but now it's long gone. Neocorelight (Talk) 05:38, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  SpongeBob image in infobox 

message: Occupation: Fast food worker Morpeko-peko (talk) 22:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Rehsarb (talk) 23:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 January 2024 

message: I know it's a really small detail, and pretty much insignificant, but still, I think it's worth asking. Should, under "Role in SpongeBob SquarePants", it be spelt naive or naïve? SonOfYoutubers (talk) 01:26, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naive or naïve?
Talk:New College, Toronto

message: U of T?  Shouldn't University of Toronto be spelled out? RickK 03:14 26 Jun 2003 (UTC)
:: Fixed. =)
:: On another note, the article reads a bit like a brochure: "Recently, with the newly finished New College Residence Hall garnering design awards for its red-bricked nod to chic "new urbanism", the College is an attractive home to university life in the campus' west-end.".... Leaf of Silver 01:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article says refers to the newly constructed New College residence building as  "New College Residence Hall", but its actual name is "45 Willcocks Residence" or "New College New Building" or just "New Building" (colloquially). "New College Residence Hall" could mean any of the three residence buildings that comprise New College. AgentEm84 (talk) 12:55, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  name of new residence
Talk:Waikato River

message: *1994 - RMA, Waikato River Plan, concerns of Maori
*warming of water by the Huntly Power Station
*water source for Auckland and the assoc controversy
*Conservation accord important for Waikato-Tainui
*Should the Waikato River Trails, under construction along the river, be mentioned? Schwede66 23:24, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs expansion

message: "The present course of the river was largely formed by the large volcanic eruption from the Lake Taupo volcanic complex 1800 years ago. The large outflow of volcanic debris blocked the old channel ...". Contradicted by http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/waikato-region/2. Nurg (talk) 01:48, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause/timing of diversion from Firth of Thames 

message: Does such a river exist, or should Template:Waikato show the Mangatangi Stream instead? The stream/river is about 40km long, which is a fair length for a river. The 1:50,000 map shows it as a Stream, but LAWA calls it a River, as does Regional Council in documents on swimming and flow, but not in the catchment management plan. Other references to River are on Te Awa, RNZ, District Council, National Library, the local historical group and a Ratification Information Booklet. Are there precedents elsewhere on Wikipedia where the sources seem divided on the name of a waterway? Johnragla (talk) 02:50, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mangatangi River