Talk:List of Punisher titles

message: --Telecart 20:53, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New volume

message: I think the this entry and Punisher Bibliography can be easily merged to form one really solid entry. Thoughts? (Emperor 15:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be removed. All infos are duplicated in The Punisher War Journal and The Punisher War Zone.  And Punisher Bibliography lists all the series, linking there. Anyway this current article is useless now and should be removed Jakilcz 23:11, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah but if you check both the The Punisher War Zone and The Punisher War Journal they have both been flagged to be merged in here. I don't really object to either really although the "List of..." naming format fits with various others like List of steampunk works, List of magazines of anomalous phenomena, List of current Dark Horse Comics publications, List of current Image Comics publications, List of Star Wars comic books, etc. so if we are not going to merge and instead delete one entry then I'd suggest the information in Punisher Bibliography be moved here. (Emperor 00:36, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, You are right, it would be better to move Punisher Bibliography here and remove it. The Punisher War Journal and The Punisher War Zone should be left as they are now. List of The Punisher comics will list series, and The Punisher War Journal etc will list all albums of this series (maybe with descriptions some day). Putting it all on one page would make no sense, such arrangement is optimal. (btw i will try to clean it yet a bit in following days cause there is still some chaos, like with category) But anyway You can remove this article and place bibliography here Jakilcz 14:10, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK cool sounds like a plan. I have dropped a note in to Jamdav86 who proposed the other merges so they can have their say in the matter but that solution does help reduce replication/redundancy of information which is the important thing. The War Zomne/Journal entries do need expanding to include details of the series (not just lists of issues) just to flesh things out. (Emperor 17:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, i started cleaning. I moved V6 to The Punisher v4 and v4 to newly created The Punisher: Purgatory as that's the real name of this series. The Punisher v5 should be removed, there is no useful info there, and in old meaning someone called like that 2 series: Wolverine/Punisher (Marvel Knights) #1-5 and Daredevil vs. The Punisher: Means and Ends (Marvel Knights) #1-6. As they are listed below, marvel knights has own article and it would break numeration  The Punisher v5 definitely should be removed not to cause additional chaos. Jakilcz 22:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds reasonable - we will need to put a redirect in place - should it point here? (Emperor 14:44, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If we can't remove it at all (as it's absolutely useless and nothing links there) yes, make it point here (or better to "list of..." where we agreed on moving this page to). Jakilcz 15:32, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If nothing a redirect will stop someone from trying to make a new entry there. (Emperor 00:56, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Jesus, what for? List of all punisher issues would create one of wikipedia's biggest article. Adding description for them would be going for a record of wikipedia's biggest article. What is wrong with the current solution that each series has it's page? Jakilcz 20:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: can somebody rename the Punisher War Journal to Punisher War Journal v1? because there will be a new war journal volume 2 in relationship to the marvel civil war, by matt fraction frbarba 00:29, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: nevermind -Bloodpack 13:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punisher War Journal v2 

message: i wonder why the The Punisher Summer Special #1-4 (1991-1994), The Punisher: Back to School Special #1-3 (1992-1994) and The Punisher Holiday Special #1-3 (1993-1995) falls under The Punisher (1987 series)? Arent they special titles which has nothing to do with the ongoing events that took place in the The Punisher (1987 series)? and besides, they have their own publication years  †Bloodpack†   argh!  06:49, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. They're annuals, and so listed in chronological continuity with the main title(s) just like any other annual. --Tenebrae 16:31, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just took a look. The way you've them now makes them seem like regular ongong series rather than annuals. No biggie, but I'd like to open up thoughts on this to the rest of the Punisher editors.--Tenebrae 16:36, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: well i guess, but the The Punisher (1987 series) already have its corresponding annual and a regular comic book series have its corresponding annuals, maybe they should be in the special titles, i mean, theyre spinoff titles right?  †Bloodpack†   argh!  15:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see it that way, as an annual series, like a bimonthly or a quarterly. I'm cool with it. Good working wit'cha!--Tenebrae 18:53, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks =] but i can still be wrong, anybody?  †Bloodpack†   argh!  21:03, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Punisher (1987 series) 

message: Like most Wikipedia editors, I have strived to make the articles I edit as accurate as possible. Unfortunately, one editor has apparently claimed ownership of this article, because they refuse to accept any edits they do not agree with, even when they correspond to the manner of style for this type of article. This has resulted in an edit war, and I have tried to politely bring this to their attention, but they have resorted to personal attacks, both in their edit summaries, and on their talk page. Please help! Fortdj33 (talk) 00:33, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format of article 

message: When i first started collecting Punisher Comics. I came to this page thinking the information was true. I went to a comic book store thinking i had the right information. Not only did i get into a fight with the store owner but looked like a fool @ the same time. That just about discouraged me from collecting comics all together. So i studied got the entire collection of punisher comics came back to this site with the right information in hand. Now some guy has to come on this site playing the victim. Acting like he knows it all when he him self does not have the entire collection of punisher comics. Has no idea the damage to this page hes making, I HAVE DONE MY BEST TO MAKE THIS PAGE AS SPOT ON AS POSSIBLE. SO NO ONE PERSON HAS TO WALK INTO A COMIC BOOK STORE AND FEEL STUPID DUE TO THE WRONG INFORMATION. To encourage would be collectors. After all no one knew "Marvel Preview #2: Featuring the Punisher (1975)(B&W Magazine) was the 1st appearance of Origin & Family Killed by Mob" Till i myself put it there and i have the copies to prove it. Which by the way the victim still has yet to prove he has any comic book of the punisher.    
People i need your help to keep the wrong information getting on our page.   
Punisher forever.   
Pun_Fan —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pun Fan (talk • contribs) 01:05, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Punisher Comics List, 

message: I think who ever made the "Solo miniseries" was a great idea! I mean back when it was mixed in with the series. Made it seem like i had to buy a lot of comics. But! with the "Solo miniseries" its so much easier on the eyes. Great Job.   
Pun_Fan--Pun Fan (talk) 04:39, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solo miniseries 

message: Just an FYI...An unregistered user reorganized the table for the Collected Editions. In doing so, this person also modified most of the ISBN numbers, which made them incorrect. There are two formats for ISBN numbers: a 10-digit format, and a 13-digit format, with the prefix "978-" and a different set of 10-digits. 
I double checked all the ISBN numbers in the table, and all the links now correspond with each entry on the Online Databases page. If anyone plans on adding or editing any more collections, please check the ISBN number to make sure it is correct, before adding it to the table. Fortdj33 (talk) 02:40, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISBN Numbers 

message: The info after the Marvel Edge series is very confusing, and there aren't clear statements on wether all series conform mainstream continuity or not. As in the initial series, maybe the spin-offs and correlative comics should appear as a unique family group. Ipsumesse (talk) 13:09, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messy info 

message: As far as I'm aware, Fortdj33 and I are in agreement regarding how The Punisher (1998 series) should be listed, thanks to dispute resolution. I plan to check back on this page when it is unlocked and, if necessary, make one edit. If Fortdj33 finds a need to make further edits, in regards to heading titles or layout or so forth, or has already made an edit, I won't object to them as long as they're in agreement with the (1998 series) article as of Fortdj33's last revision. Fortdj33, if you have any issue with that, please discuss it here. I'll be civil this time. I've left a similar message on the (1998 series) talk page. Much of my missteps were due to inexperience and lack of knowledge, and for that I apologize. They were also due to me not having the calmest temperament in the world, and for that I suppose I apologize too.
The point is, I think we're good here, but I don't want to misrepresent you so let me know if we're not. I'd also thought that it might make sense to organize the list the way the template is currently organized. Just a thought, though; ignore it if there's a reason why it isn't already that way. Snakebyte42 (talk) 01:02, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consensus 

message: i edited this article to write Main ongoing series under 'Main Universe' and alternate titles like MAX under 'MAX' heading and did same for limited and one-shots but all my changes have been reverted can u tell me why ??? because that was a good way to structure to this article. Now i have again refined the article in following form plz let me know what is the problem with this structure of publication view??
:I reverted your edits, because the current format was come to by consensus, after a content dispute on this article. While everyone is welcome to contribute to the improvement of this article, please do not just revert it back to your version, without discussing it on the talk page first. And copying the entire article to the talk page, in order to present your POV, make it hard for other editors to understand what you are trying to discuss. Fortdj33 (talk) 12:47, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll second that. I'm quite happy with the article in its present form, and my agreement to the current consensus still stands. Snakebyte42 (talk) 12:17, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Refining Publication portion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Punisher titles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080220085119/http://www.thepunisher.nl/index.html to http://www.thepunisher.nl/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Do all of these series really need separate pages? It seems to me that they could be fit in one article without too much trouble. The Avengers (comic book) is an example of this. Namenamenamenamename (talk) 23:57, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: What?★Trekker (talk) 00:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary topic splits