lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Columbia Road Flower Market

message: *Previous deletion debate
"The shops along Columbia road have opening times entirely aligned with market hours: Sunday morning only. Only the Royal Oak, pictured below, the chemist and the local Londis are open at other times"
Is this true? I was drinking in a place called The Fleapit on Columbia Road a few weeks ago, and that definitely wasn't on a Sunday morning. There were other pubs and cafes open too. Also, it sound unlikely that any business in London could survive only being open a few hours a week, or that it would be particularly desirable to have a street completely almost all of the time.86.0.203.120
I think it's a bit exaggerated. There certainly used to be some like that - it's essentially a small residential neighbourhood when the market isn't on - so, without the market a lot of shops would find it difficult to make money anyway. There are some 'yards' in local streets that are workshops during the week, and only open to the public at weekends. I haven't been there for sometime. I wrote bits of the history of the market, but left the modern market to people with more contemporary experience. The bohemian Saturday Broadway market, nearby has attracted shops that are open through the week, but it's very quiet 'off-market'. They do open - so I think it would be much the same. I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't open Mondays - after working on Sunday, but as I say, it needs someone with more specific local knowledge to rephrase it. Kbthompson 08:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:White Sands National Park

message: While White Sands National Monument is a part of White Sands Missile Range, the Trinity test site is not a part of the Monument. Why is it listed on the WSNM page? (Last sentence of "Description" section.) 71.234.215.133 (talk) 03:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trinity: Range not Monument 

message: * Evidence of humans in North America during the Last Glacial Maximum (2021) Viriditas (talk) 20:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 22:23, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed
Talk:Wanadoo

message: There should maybe be a separate article on Freeserve, explaining how it was the first company to introduce flat-rate internet connections in the UK. Lee M 01:39, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: tens of millions of subscribers
:Well how many are they?--Jerryseinfeld 04:40, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What does "TP" stand for? --Jamesedmo 15:52, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Customers 

message: Should thre be a little more info on Freeserve? Freeserve sparked a lot of excitement when it was launched as the first Pay-as-you-go internet access provider and spawned a whole new method of paying for net access in the uk - this doesn't get a mention here Thefamousgeoff 17:00, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There should really be a separate article on Freeserve, as Lee M already suggested above. It just needs someone who knows enough about it and feels like writing it up. --Zundark 17:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freeserve 

message: Please see the discussion on the Orange SA article. --KenBailey 20:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orange 

message: The Article says that orange is the "largest ISP in Europe", with over 10 million customers. On the T-Online-Page it says that t-online has 13,4 million customers. From these numbers i would conclude that t-online is in fact the largest ISP in Europe...Is there any source to back up that orange is the biggest (or probably it's changing so fast that any source would be outdated...)? 84.57.90.164 20:04, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest ISP in Europe?
Talk:Ingénue (album)

message: On the k.d. lang page in Wikipedia, tehre are several albums listed before this album. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.82.171.186 (talk) 02:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: second album?
Template talk:History of France infobox

message: I was thinking of ways to distinguish the revolution articles from the general history articles in a way that doesn't involve the bullet points, which are a bit ugly and take too much space, and came up with the below design (meant to resemble the Tricolore). Does anyone have any opinions on it? Is too fancy? If no one objects, I'll implement it in a few days (right-aligned, of course). -Didactohedron 02:02, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)
History of Franceseries
Gaul
Franks
Middle Ages
Ancien Régime
French Revolution
Causes
Estates-General
National Assembly
Storming of the Bastille
National ConstituentAssembly (1, 2, 3)
Legislative Assemblyand fall of the monarchy
National Conventionand Reign of Terror
Directory
Consulate
Related: Glossary,Timeline, Wars,List of people
First Empire
Restoration
Second Republic
Second Empire
Third Republic
Modern France
This ought to go under Talk:History of France, for better exposure (IMHO) Ashibaka tlk 02:03, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Good thinking. I added a note to Talk:French Revolution. -Didactohedron 02:11, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)
I think it's fine. It might be tough to edit, but it's not like it should ever need much editing. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:27, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)
runescape is the best else420 is my name  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.213.108.217 (talk) 17:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal

message: I'm currently working on an updated version of this following discussions on the French Revolution article. Basically, as there is already a Template:History of France box on the right, we wanted to create one to go at the bottom of the article.
New project => Do have a look and comment! Thanks. Hrcolyer (talk) 16:21, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Version
Talk:Balanced Rock

message: In my opinion this image is of higher quality, although the balanced rock is not in the center of the image. On the other hand this shows more context. Crop it, leave it or toss it?
I took the image during a visit at the park in April'04 during sunset, hence the vivid colors.
--Dschwen 02:09, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The 3000x2000 pic was bigger alright, but it was very blurry (quality just didn't justify the size). I replaced it with this one from the discussion page since I think it is sharper and gives a better sense of proportions. --Dschwen 11:36, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: What is "the size of three school buses"? Is there a source somewhere that gives the size in some actual units? Ntsimp (talk) 03:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of the rock 

message: This article and another called Balancing Rocks refer to specific geologic formations. However, there are at least several dozen such formations around the world that go by similar names. I propose we have a single article under the title of "Balancing Rocks" that describes the geological, cultural and historical nature of these formations in general and lists all of the formations in a single article. Unless someone objects or has a better idea, I'll create an initial version of this new format soon. Lexaxis7 (talk) 20:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: This article is rather redundant, it states that it's "the size of three school buses" twice in the article. Maybe change it and give it in feet and meters? NovaSilisko (talk) 19:42, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundancy

message: This citation literally references this selfsame page... What? Adeeta (talk) 21:28, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation [1]
Talk:Moses Znaimer

message: I removed: "City's format was also unique in that its programming schedule, in the beginning, consisted of news, movies, and music, and nothing else." How much music was there to broadcast on television in 1972? I think this point is probably a bit overstated. Samaritan 02:27, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: News, Movies and Music

message: In several places, the surname is spelt "Znamier" instead of "Znaimer". Is this a mistake, or did Moses change his name somewhere along the way? Nothing seems to be said about that in the article; so I suspect that it's the former. If so, I (or somebody else) can change it. Kelisi (talk) 21:11, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  >Spelling
Talk:Drag (k.d. lang album)

message: Removing this from the first paragraph because it's wrong and original research.  "Drag" also means to take an inhale from a cigarette, as well. 12.162.122.6 (talk) 19:08, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "The cover is only a visual pun;"
Talk:Coronation Chair

message: Wasn't the Stone of Scone returned to Scotland a couple of years ago???
<P>
TA
:Yes, this is correct: see Stone of Scone. It is to be brought to Westminster for a coronation, but otherwise remains in Edinburgh Castle. AlexG 15:30, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Stone

message: "The chair was named after England's only canonized king, Edward the Confessor..."  What about Edward the Martyr??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_the_Martyr
Carlos_X 20:49, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Saint?

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Coronation chair and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 01:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Coronation chair" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:List of ships on stamps

message: In response to the last edit summary, this list's format was inherited from the list of people on stamps, which I've just redesigned. I'm not sure if the list here would ultimately be so long as to need multiple sublists;  mentions a handbook with 3,500 named vessels as of 1990, longish by WP standards but not outlandish. Stan 04:01, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004 post
Talk:The Ugly Duckling

message: The best film version of this story hands down is Hallmark's Timeless Tales musical from 1990 narrated by Olivia Newton John and animated by Hanna-Barbera. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 144.126.217.152 (talk) 06:36, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the ugly duckling on film

message: The English Wikipedia, alone among all other Wikipedias, says:
:The Ugly Duckling is a fairy tale written in 1872
The other Wikipedias usually say the story was first published on 11 November 1843 which is verified by http://www.andersen.sdu.dk/vaerk/register/info_e.html?vid=66. I believe the error occurred because of the number "1872" appearing in the very poor translation which was given in the article. I have removed that link and replaced it with a link to a proper translation and changed the date of publication. Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:49, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1872 or 11 November 1843 ? 

message: There is a section in Disney's "Fantasia" in which the situation is completely reversed, with a duckling somehow falling in with a mother swan and her brood of cygnets.  Oddly, despite being rejected by his would-be adoptive family, he rises to their defense when one of the cygnets is captured by a hawk.  After rescuing the cygnet, the duckling is welcomed into the family with open . . . wings.
70.184.178.196 (talk) 18:40, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Tables Turned 

message: Don't see this as a fairy tale. Ducks and swans aren't mythical or fantastical.
Surely it's just a children's fable. Grumpygary (talk) 17:13, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fable, not fairy tale
Talk:Flavigny-sur-Ozerain

message: Please do not claim that the SSPX is "schismatic". This is incorrect. Even the Vatican does not claim that.
Elaineseery (talk) 10:03, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is a bit much to describe the SSPX as "a traditionalist wing of the Roman Catholic Church" - it has no canonical status within the Church as referenced on the main SSPX page Mark.hamid (talk) 14:15, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Present canonical status of the SSPX
Talk:Herbert Wechsler

message: Please delete the original as a copyright violation and replace with the temporary stub that has been created.
:Done. Thue | talk 14:30, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article contained this comment, which belongs on the talk page and not in the body:
"THE SENTENCE I DELETED FROM THIS PARAGRAPH IS INCORRECT - WECHSLER DID NOT ARGUE THE KOREMATSU CASE IN THE SUPREME COURT OR IN ANY OTHER COURT. THE U.S. GOVERNMENT WAS REPRESENTED AT THE SUPREME COURT ARGUMENT BY CHARLES FAHY, THE U.S. SOLICITOR GENERAL AT THE TIME. SEE https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/323/214.html. THE REMAINING SENTENCE INTHIS PARAGRAPH CORRECTLY NOTES THAT WECHSLER WAS IN CHARGE OF THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT'S WAR DIVISION - THE WAR DIVISION'S RESPONSIBILITIES DID NOT INCLUDE ARGUING CASES IN COURT. BY CONTRAST, IT WAS (AND STILL IS) THE SOLICITOR GENERAL'S JOB TO ARGUE SUPREME COURT CASES. WECHSLER'S NAME MAY HAVE APPEARED ON THE BRIEF AS ONE OF THE DOJ ATTORNEYS WHO PARTICIPATED IN ITS PREPARATION, BUT HE DID NOT ARGUE THE CASE. FURTHERMORE, I WAS IN A CLASS AT COLUMBIA LAW SCHOOL TAUGHT BY WECHSLER IN 1980 OR 1981 IN WHICH WECHSLER DESCRIBED THE INTERNAL DISCUSSIONS THAT LED TO ROOSEVELT'S DECISION TO INTERN JAPANESE-AMERICANS, AND HE WAS QUITE CLEAR THAT HE HAD OPPOSED THE DECISION."
I have moved it here for posterity.-Ich (talk) 20:21, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed comment
Talk:New Jersey's congressional districts

message: To Do: 
Hunterdon County is not entirely in District 12 but rather partially in District 7 and 12. - will list the towns in each district when I get around to it in the future.
--Quotison 05:05, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Millburn is listed as being partly in the eleventh congressional district. However, no other district claims the remaining portion of millburn. I seem to remember that millburn is totally in the eleventh district. This needs to be confirmed and updated.
:The League of Women Voters: 2006 New Jersey Citizen's Guide to Government (p. 60) says its split between 10 and 11. I'll check the 10th district article. Alansohn 00:01, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Every split district was corrected based on the LWV NJ guide. For each district that is split the text (part; also in ##) was added to indicate the other district (or districts) that the municipality is covered by. All other districts not specified as split in the LWV guide had the (part) text removed. Alansohn 01:40, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Millburn

message: Someone needs to provide the redistricting based on the 2010 Census. --DThomsen8 (talk) 14:02, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redistricting based on 2010 Census 
Talk:This Is Wonderland

message: Is this show still on? I haven't seen it at all this year...it's still on the CBC website, but it has no spot in the schedule. Adam Bishop 06:00, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: As of my posting this, the second season is playing every week (until it's no longer playing). Excellent show. 24.76.141.132 05:58, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.76.141.132 (talk • contribs) 04:39, 23 March 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: List this under Dramadie?

message: Shouldn't cancelled shows be reffered to in the past tense? --99.225.231.76 (talk) 23:10, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the policy is that the show still exists in some (recorded) form.  PKT(alk) 03:05, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: past tense?
Talk:Barak

message: It isn't clear that the semetic words for "lightning" and "blessed" are themselves unrelated.  There are lots of plausible bases for linking the two (notion of someone being fortunate and hit by lightning as acts of selection by G_d).  In the absence of a citation to the contrary, the fact that the name of the biblical Barak was intended to mean lightning (itself uncited) and the contemporary Barack Obama was intended to mean blessing (also uncited), should not be presented as supporting an inference that the names do not have common origin.  (also, this would by Synth)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.108.139.170 (talk) 17:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Blessed" and "Lightning"

message: One or more of the sign/s:  placed on this page without any discussion, explanation or reasoning have been removed pending further discussion. (The category :Category:Bible stories is now up for a vote for deletion at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Bible stories) Thank you. IZAK 10:56, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The {} sign/s 

message: How is an Arabic translation different from the Greek or Latin translation?  The text is not Arabic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.48.87.118 (talk) 13:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the reason that the name is in Arabic but not Greek or Latin
Talk:Ventura Boulevard

message: Um.. this needs better song quoting:
"Ventura Boulevard is also mentioned in Tom Petty's song "Free Fallin'" ("All the vampires walkin' through the valley, Move west down Ventura Boulevard..."), although there is no freeway through Reseda."
The relevent lyric is "It's a long day living in Reseda.  There's a freeway running through the yard.".
Eric 06:50, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: true... had got me confused for a moment there.. made the edit. joseph 15:55, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Venutra Blvd. is not a freeway. It is just placed when US 101 begun constructions in the 1960s and when the Ventura Freeway is completed US 101 is removed from Ventura Blvd. and signed as BUS 101. --Freewayguy Ask? +000s 02:14, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing header

message: Ventura Business District, Los Angeles has no independence nor any sources. GeorgeLouis (talk) 02:35, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Ventura Business District to here.
Talk:Mount Song

message: Could we be told the names of the other four sacred mountains please? --Wetman 06:56, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A free image is available on :zh:Image:少林寺.jpg. --Ghirla-трёп- 21:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: This section is quite poorly written, with statements that are highly opinionated (like the assertion that Mao would have been overthrown for carrying out the Cultural Revolution if he hadn't died). It also doesn't seem relevant at all to the development of Mount Song, but instead goes into a lot of detail about Maoist politics and non-mountain related policies. Does anyone else agree that this section should be cut down significantly? F1anders (talk) 22:45, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Setbacks under Mao
Talk:The Tortilla Curtain

message: I changed a fair amount of stuff.  Most notably, perhaps, I specified the "big city" as Los Angeles, since that's pretty clearly what it is.  Boyle even specifies the Topanga Canyon area, in the hills northeast of Santa Monica and Malibu.
Nightsky 07:01, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)
----
Does anybody know a site where i can find the content of every chapter? Anonymous 16:20, May 16, 2005 (ECT)
Try the library.  Nightsky 16:54, May 17, 2005 (UTC)
Yeah!  I heard they have a book just like that...I believe it's called The Tortilla Curtain
Here's what you're looking for: http://home.arcor.de/tortillacurtain/summaries.htm 
Also, isn't this statement untrue? "The Tortilla Curtain is the story of two couples who have nothing whatsoever in common except the fact that they live in the same area." The whole point of the novel is that they have a lot in common, thats why their stories are paralleled.
DA723 01:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should a mention of the controversy about this book being in school reading lists be mentioned?
See http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20100127/ARTICLES/100129471/1350?Title=School-board-votes-to-keep-disputed-book
Kevink707 (talk) 15:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the news
Talk:Book of Daniel

message: There is nothing Christophobic about the 2nd century dating. Many pious Christians embrace it. E.g. Bart Ehrman's professors: it was the default view at his divinity school, see https://ehrmanblog.org/charges-and-anti-supernatural-biases-readers-mailbag-august-6-2017/ "Taking such a view is not anti-supernaturalist.   It is simply taking a historical approach to the task of interpretation, instead of a non-critical one." tgeorgescu (talk)  12:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In any case, the pseudo-prophecies of the Book of Daniel are hardly essential to Christianity. Dimadick (talk) 19:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christophobic 

message: Your interpretation worked okay for many centuries. Luther and Calvin cannot be blamed for believing in it. But it came to a grinding halt with the Millerites. Nowadays, most Protestant churches don't endorse your interpretation, and Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy didn't historically endorse it, anyway. Protestants overwhelmingly abandoned it since the 1850s, so it's WP:FRINGE according to the historical method, and it's WP:FRINGE theologically. So, both academic fields which cover this article say your edits are completely fringe. Your POV was seen as credible theological dogma, but only before the 1850s. Its prediction of the Second Coming of Christ is a failure, and, strictly speaking, its prediction of the First Coming is also a failure.
As argued above, taking the historical method seriously should not be conflated with anti-supernaturalism: the Princeton Theological Seminary is by and large not anti-supernaturalist, but it teaches the circa 165 BCE dating as fact. Historians cannot posit miracles as objective historical facts, but there is no requirement that historians deny the existence of miracles. tgeorgescu (talk)  09:31, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV issues 

message: See all the posts above. Tell me one of the top 100 universities from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2024 which agrees with the IP. tgeorgescu (talk)  16:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Tgeorgescu: The University of Liverpool agrees with the IP. Potatín5 (talk) 20:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Millard is not unaware of the scholarly consensus: "almost all commentators deduce that the book could only have been composed in the second century BC." That is, he is dismissing apologists out of hand. So, don't blame me for doing that, either. tgeorgescu (talk)  08:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war 

message: Can someone please explain this excessive citing here:
This is looks like Wikipedia:Citation overkill to me. Is this really that controversial or something?CycoMa1 (talk) 04:55, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Now I see the discussion above. But still, this excessive citing looks terrible.CycoMa1 (talk) 04:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive citing
Talk:Politics of Belize

message: In reply to the edit comment on why we don't have a picci of the prime minister, Said Musa, that was because I couldn't find one on Wikipedia to add when I added Queen Elizabeth II. I agree the article would be better with one of him (as well as the Queen). If anyone has a free use picci of him, please add it. jguk 07:22, 18 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: top

message: The template for Politics of Belize has been vandalised. Can someone kindly fix it?--206.27.244.160 19:48, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 