lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:American Canadian Underwater Certifications

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 09:15, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Alberta Union of Provincial Employees

message: This article reads like a propaganda piece. I suspect a natural result of only using official union documents.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.72.160.143 (talk) 18:03, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The person above is CUPE.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shimo1989 (talk • contribs) 03:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

message: There should be an ongoing separate news article about the strike!173.179.169.167 (talk) 15:48, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 2013 Wildcat strike

message: Hi, I'm new to editing Wiki, just writing a note here to say I tried to make some improvements to address some of the identified issues with this article. Please feel free to suggest/make changes if needed. For example, I wasn't sure if the Membership section should come after History, or if it is ok to be before, since that info was moved from the lead section, or if there is a rule that History must come first (I've just noticed this seems to be a norm on other pages). Thanks! MorgenMuffelMädchen (talk) 07:04, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Membership section and edits
Talk:Europa Universalis: Rome

message: This article is too short. It is stub, someone needs to expand it... MR.CRO95 (talk) 09:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TOO SHORT 

message: That claim about Vae Victis linking all Paradox games together is almost certainly a joke. Can't find any info on it anywhere and it doesn't even make sense mechanically. I've added the  template to it for now, but I think it might as well be removed altogether. --Daniel Klein (talk) 22:24, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vae Victis
Talk:Galgo

message: I was looking for the Spanish Galgo (or Spanish Greyhound) page and just entered Galgo and came here.  A little confusing.  Can we have a note at the top saying "If you are looking for the dog breed known as Spanish Galgo, please see Galgo Español --24.72.59.197 (talk) 03:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tenenet

message: I question whether this is a genuine article or a spoof, the only refferences to tenenit on Google are at Wikipedia shodow sites. If someone can supply some more info then please do so.
Lumos3 20:55, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a reference on this site which claims a copyright date of 1994/5 and doesn't appear to be taking material from Wikipedia.--  ALargeElk | Talk 09:35, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this a spoof?

message: Proposing merge with Tjenenyet. The same subject. Duplicate articles. --Vachovec1 (talk) 00:39, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. An obvious move, and I'm chagrined to say I never noticed that there were two articles about this goddess. A. Parrot (talk) 01:17, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Sleep apnea/Archive 1

message: : Rather than deleting questions, can you clarify who is the "owner" of the vibration and/or the sensors? Jclerman 06:12, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  For lack of verifiable source(s) to ascertain whether "our" was either a vendor's self-reference or a typo for "your", "four", or "or", the statement has been temporarily deleted.Jclerman 18:10, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  our vibration sensors ??? 

message: While the "obstructive" and "central" types are both established terms, I can't find good references for "Training apnea". Is this a widely recognized category? If not, perhaps it should be deleted from the article. --Arcadian 15:48, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the following section for now, until or unless it can be validated.  "(Training Apnea; informal suggestion for identification) Noted amongst a minority of active free-divers, this is the case of subjects performing apnea while sleeping, generally coincident with a related dream. Some cases have been determined to last until the point at which diaphramatic contractions occur, and are estimated to be greater than one minute in length." --Arcadian 14:08, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Training apnea"?

message: Dear 12.73.194-201.x: As a bit of friendly advice, you may want to take a look at Wikipedia:Why create an account?. --Arcadian 17:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent reversions

message: Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 03:45, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  3RR warning
Talk:ETP-1

message: I know Test Card F was used on ITV in the early/mid 70s but I'm not sure it's correct to say that ETP-1 "replaced" F on ITV.  I watched the Thames TV startup a lot of times as a nipper in the late 70s - before ETP-1 was unveiled in '79, Thames generally broadcast colour bars in the mornings.  These were shown with a deep tone and then a few minutes before opening time, the bottom half of the screen went all red and the the low pitched tone abruptly became a high pitched tone.  When ETP-1 was introduced, it was paired with thee same low pitched tone which would switch to the colour bars with red bottom half and high pitched tone for the final few minutes before the startup.  When I visited the Westward TV area on summer hols in 1980 aged 6, they just had colour bars until the startup aired (although ETP-1 was up and running most elswhere.)  So all in all, it looks to me like ETP-1 actually replaced the colour bars and Test Card F had already disappeared from ITV some years previously say about '75/'76.  ETP-1 didn't directly replace F - it replaced colour bars which had already replaced F a few years earlier 81.158.209.230 (talk) 01:58, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...Replacing Test Card F"
Talk:Monoscope

message: Why couldnt three (Red, Green, Blue) monoscopes have been used ? 213.40.114.230 (talk) 22:00, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Inability to produce colour
Talk:Urgent Care Association

message: I nominate this page for deletion. This article is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person and is not an acceptable as an article acording to Wikipedia guidelines.
-- 71.43.215.143 (talk) 21:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've cleaned it up significantly.  While the article was unacceptably promotional I think a large membership association for medical facilities is inherently notable and it would be better for wikipedia if we could keep a non-promotional article on them.  Unfortunately it seems that UCAOA are editing the article themselves and making it read like a brochure written by their PR department.  Hopefully if they are notified that this is not acceptable practice here they will stop. -- SiobhanHansa 17:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion ? 

message: This article really needs some independent sources.  At the moment the only sources of information are UCAOA's own website and a PR release from a partner organization.  If editors know of any independent newspaper or magazine articles they might make very useful resources to help develop the article.
This article also appears to have been edited by staff of UCAOA.  Given the style of changes and the username, I believe these edits were made by Lou Ellen Howritz UCAOA's executive director.  Any staff of UCAOA or related organizations should take a look at our guidelines on editing with a conflict of interest as well as our policy on not being a platform for promotion and our guidelines adding external links to sites you are connected to. -- SiobhanHansa 17:24, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current issues
Talk:List of BBC test cards

message: Hi, just making a suggestion about this page, and about some of the other testcard articles. As it is small fragments of information are scattered across the articles and alot of non-free images are used to show these cards. It might be an idea to move the contents of these seperate articles into this one, or to merge some of the articvles around. One example may be to merge TC F and J together, as they are essentially the same without minor technological changes. Also, although images are good, there may be too many. You may want to consider thinning them down. Regards. Rafmarham (talk) 14:08, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: Apparently there was some trouble with non-free images on this page that was "taken care of" by their removal.  That's fine, but there should be a replacement image for each image removed with all fair use claims resolved, or at the very least mentions of these now non-existent images should be removed from the article.  Ndm13 (talk) 01:07, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing images 
Talk:Test Card H

message: I propose that Test Card H be merged into List of BBC test cards. The length of the former article is pathetically tiny, no issues with it exist besides being a stub, except for a lack of citations, and all of its content could fit perfectly well in the latter article. I mean, the latter article is relatively short, but not necessarily a stub. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 22:31, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal with List of BBC test cards
Talk:Canadian Union of Operating Engineers

message: Since the CUOE became part of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada and there are few WP:RS available to support the CUOE article, I propose it be moved to a section within the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada article. 1292simon (talk) 22:46, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:Test Card W

message: removed massive set of instructions on how to view this image. wp is not a how to manual.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:37, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  howto 

message: Removed the following content:-
: The last occasion that Test Card W was broadcast on BBC One and BBC Two was Friday 9 January 2004. The times before that were for a few minutes on 3 December 2003 on BBC Two during the 2003 tests; seen for around 20 minutes during Pages from Ceefax time from about 02.20 on 22 June 2003; a brief appearance in the early in the morning of 14 August 2001 in a programme gap; on BBC One between 03.00 and 04.00 on 27 July 2001 (while BBC Two was on reduced power); and during the August 2000 BBC rebroadcast test. Test Card W flashed up briefly on BBC One early in the morning of Tuesday 3 November 2009 during the opening credits to BBC Breakfast.
The reason is that the opening bit "The last occasion that Test Card W was broadcast..." was originally written in 2004 (), and may be massively and meaninglessly out of date by now! I could have added "As of 2004" to make this less misleading, but it still wouldn't have been useful almost ten years down the line. If it hasn't been broadcast since then, it should be updated and clearly referenced.
Which brings me to the other reason it was deleted- no references for those alleged sightings, and no indication as to whether it was a complete list (omitting that may give a misleading impression of the frequency of transmission). Wikipedia isn't the place for arbitrary mentions of transmissions for trainspotterish reasons(!) Ubcule (talk) 20:42, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sightings" section removed
Talk:Henry Kamen

message: kamen ought to be capitalized as Kamen.-- ProudPapa5 (talk) 21:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Is this section appropriate to an encyclopedia?  Move to talk. RJFJR (talk) 14:46, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Selected reviews

message: The following well-documented sentence, put in by me, was deleted by @Symmachus1 as “libelous”. According to U.S. law an indictment is by definition not libelous. Of course it’s not a conviction, but almost all of these cases (98% or so) end in a guilty plea as part of a plea bargain. deisenbe (talk) 14:49, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A notice of an indictment, published by the Justice Department, is not libelous. Fishlandia (talk) 20:47, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indictment for child porn
Template talk:Domestic dog

message: I created this navigation box because that is what I do. I am not a dog expert. Please add/change/delete as appropriate.---- Old Hoss (talk) 22:02, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New 

message: Should we add the gray wolf in this template?--4444hhhh (talk) 22:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The template is for the domestic dog, not the wild kin. Hafwyn (talk) 22:00, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gray Wolf

message: Put all of the dog sports together and directed to the List of dog sports--Hafwyn (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human-dog Interaction 

message: Keep: I believe the :Category:Dog equipment ( diff ) section added to the template is important, contains relevant information and should remain in the template. Thank you. ChanziP (talk) 10:33, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello , I see that in March it will have been four years since you last edited this navbox. As I have said in my previous edit summaries, this template is already big enough with far too great a weight placed on western aspects of dogs and dog ownership hence I oppose the introduction of this content to this navbox. Further, please stop trying to edit war you undiscussed additions into the navbox, over the years you have received more blocks for edit warring than I can be bothered counting up, you should understand our policies by now. Cavalryman (talk) 02:21, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello , please do not revert the template until a consensus is decided upon. Thank you! ChanziP (talk) 10:30, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template - [[:Category:Dog equipment]] entry 

message: I am considering adding a link to a dog-specific disease (Rage syndrome) to the Health section but am divided on whether it improves the template. For example, it might fit better in a separate template about illnesses in dogs, or a template about dog aggression and training, neither of which exist currently. But I don't want to make a new template if that would be unhelpful - I've heard some complaints about unnecessary templates. SkrikerandTrash (talk) 07:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly rather than a new template about illnesses in dogs, a new section in the Domestic_dog template could be added for illnesses in dogs? SkrikerandTrash (talk) 21:32, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding dog-specific diseases
Talk:Egyptian Arabic/Archive 3

message: What exactly is meant by this?  I don't understand the point of listing those words. --Maha Odeh 06:55, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this actually meant to be a serious question? Egyegy  12:09, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characteristic words and sentences in Egyptian Arabic 

message: User:Skatewalk has been indefinitely blocked for being a sockpuppet of User:Serenesoulnyc. However, some good discussions have come out of the recent chaos and acrimony. I will go ahead and make the suggested changes to the lead. If you have other suggestions, please continue the discussion here. — Zerida 20:25, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consensus
Talk:Elizabeth and Middleton Reefs Marine National Park Reserve

message: Whilst these reefs are closely located and are often referenced together the reefs have a number of different features. The protection provided to each reef differs under the heritage act. Obviously the geographic position of each reef is diffent and this impacts the ability to link the article into geo browsers such as google earth. I was considering an article for each reef.
Thoughts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ejboyd1 (talk • contribs) 23:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split into two articles? 
Talk:Kevin Murphy (swimmer)

message: I am not sure Kevin is the current King of the Channel or not. Per the Channel Swimming Association website the current King of the Channel is Michael Read with 33 Crossings. However I am not sure this page is up to date. -- Anotheruserhere (talk) 22:12, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WWFG

message: The file :File:WWFG logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free former logo being used in a :WP:DECORATIVE manner in :WWFG#Previous logo which fails :WP:NFCC#8. Non-free former logos can be used as long as their use complies with :WP:NFC#cite_note-4 and this almost always means the logo itself about the logo and the associated change in brandling that led to its replacement is the subject of sourced critical commentary. Simply adding the logo to "show" what it looks like is not considered sufficient to satisfy :WP:NFC#CS, except in cases where the logo is being used for primary identification purposes at the top of or in the main infobox of an article about the organization the logo represents.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on .
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:44, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:WWFG logo.jpg]]
Talk:Barry Bonds perjury case

message: I'll be nice enough not to put a tag for a cleanup, but it seems very irritating to read, it needs to be reviewed and broken up. --Chinese3126 (talk) 02:57, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:Forbidden Love: The Unashamed Stories of Lesbian Lives

message: Heya. Kewl that you created this. I have this video at home. It has a few mentions in some papers, so I can bring it to at least a start class article. Have you seen it? --Moni3 (talk) 02:15, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I've never seen it. Never even heard of it until I was reading your (fantastic) Ann Bannon article. Just thought I'd try & make a red link blue! Looks interesting though. A couple of links in case I don't get around to them...
* New York Times review
* Google book search
--BelovedFreak 12:45, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Can we unstub it now? You should totally get this movie, even if you have to buy it. I had to. The dramatic sequences are cringeworthy and hot at the same time and I don't know how that can be, but there you are... --Moni3 (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and destubbed it, per my edit summary. Restore if you disagree. Thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:19, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweet
Talk:Sergei Storchak

message: Could someone be having a laugh with that sentence about Storchak's comrades losing THE GAME? --Frenkmelk talk 07:23, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Losing THE GAME? 
Talk:Paul Morris (producer)

message: Please cite the sources for this information. If a source cannot be cited, this information should be removed.
I've added a fuller description of Paul's academic paper, although I may create a separate article from it and transfer the text to that instead (might be sensible).
Alibi 17:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Morris Biography 

message: Nothing in here that verifies article content. --NeilN talk to me 04:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of text in lead 

message: Bbrts has been one of the largest bareback websites for years on the internet, should be notable. 138.84.45.21 (talk) 12:47, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  barebackrt.com
Talk:List of Yu-Gi-Oh! media

message: Can someone provide evidence for the World Championship 2009 under the Nintendo Wii section?  Otherwise, I don't think it needs to be there, since there doesn't seem to be anything about it online that I've been able to find.--208.104.166.216 (talk) 17:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: World Championship 2009

message: ok why is the Xbox game not listed on the page?--"I am an oktau and a baka at times but deny proven facts and you got a fight" comment added by Dragonmaster88 (talk • contribs) 04:57, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Yu-gi-oh! game for Xbox

message: Should Joel Douek releasing most of the English OST for Yu-i-Oh! be mentioned? It can be found through his YouTube channel otmny and his website listed on that channel. I don't want to post the link just in case but I thought it was worth mention. ggctuk (2005) (talk) 09:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joel Douek released most of English soundtrack
Talk:New York State Route 20N

message: WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination.  It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please.  The survey will end on April 30.
* Would you like any additional feedback on the writing style in this article?
* If you write a lot outside of Wikipedia, what kind of writing do you do?
* Is your writing style influenced by any particular WikiProject or other group on Wikipedia? 
At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style.  Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 04:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey 

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div>
Just a minor prose issue, which does not prevent me from awarding GA status. Congrats! —Rob (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review