lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Prohibited airspace

message: Hi fellow wikipedians. Is there any reason why Area 51 is excluded here? I thought no one is allowed to fly over it. TravelAroundOz (talk) 11:50, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Area 51 is technically not a prohibited airspace.  It's depicted on current sectional charts as underlying R-4808 N, which is a restricted area.  Of course, this particular restricted airspace is from surface to unlimited and active continuously, so it is effectively an airspace where civilian air traffic is prohibited.  But it is not actually a "Prohibited Airspace", as defined by the aviation laws and standards. 72.48.42.90 (talk) 18:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area 51 not restricted?
Talk:Relative wind

message: Relative wind is a simple idea requiring really only a definition.  Skydiving technique is off-topic.  It should be in a skydiving article which links to a definition page when it uses "relative wind" as jargon.
It is important and frequently-used aeronautical jargon that shouldn't have to be re-defined in all the aero articles.  So it should be defined somehow within wikipedia in a way that can be linked to.  I think there is a category of "article" that is a simple definition (or something like that).  I'll look into it and make that change when I figure out how, unless someone else wants to ...  :-)
-- Gummer85 (talk) 22:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability problem here? Skydiving off topic?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/HisSpaceResearch

message: Some of my edits in the past have not been perfect, although I feel that the vast majority of my edits are strong evidence that I am a good editor and a valuable member of the community. My userpage states that I "reserve the right to screw up my edits", meaning that assuming good faith is vital, although with a good understanding of most of the processes of Wikipedia, I promise that I can adhere to high standards of admin conduct. Do you think I should remove that userbox from my userpage if I become an admin, to show that I am competent and will not screw up my edits at any time?--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 18:45, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something I'd like to add 

message: It should be noted that the main reason I made this account was to create the Morris Pert article, and since he is a family relative of mine, I felt at the time that I wanted to use another account to create the article about him. However, since then I have dropped all concerns about this.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 19:17, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:Sproglet777 

message: If you see User:HisSpaceResearch/Archive_2#history - I use a wireless connection, and I'd been telling my flatmate about Wikipedia for a while, and how great it was. He vandalised it when he got back home when he was drunk one night, on his laptop which has the same IP address as my computer, and I got up the next day and found that I was unable to edit. I told him not to do that again, and he hasn't done it since.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 19:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My IP was blocked just once - and I'll tell you why
Talk:Run and break

message: File:Not your everyday run in and break. (5251510429).jpg
File:Three French Navy Atlantiques run in and break to land at Garons Naval Base (4729248955).jpg
--Flominator (talk) 19:31, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential images 

message: The procedure isn't totally accurate, and will vary with aircraft type, military branch, and possibly even by squadron. A typical fighter-jet overhead pattern is something like 350-360kts at 1,500ft AGL with a 3-4G turn to downwind. External tanks are fitted to fighters for most missions and with that kind of external load "Hi-G" maneuvers (greater than 5-6G) are prohibited. (180.59.215.134 (talk) 06:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Procedure
Talk:Gustav (name)

message: Can we add people who has Gustav as one of their multiple first names? Like Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi and Johann Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet. 2A01:799:119E:BE00:A4D6:6188:28F0:9E3D (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who can be added?
Talk:Trailing edge

message: The phrase "trailing edge" is also used in electronics to describe the down-going part of a signal. 192.249.47.180 (talk) 21:12, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can cite a reference for that we can add it! - Ahunt (talk) 01:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Electronics 

message: Re: This beginning paragraph needs attention:
“ The trailing edge of an aerodynamic surface such as a wing is its rear edge, where the airflow separated by the leading edge rejoins.”
I’m not an aeronautical engineer, but there’s much evidence to suggest that the air at the ‘trailing edge‘ is not the same air molecules from the leading edge, thus it doesn’t ‘rejoin’.
Many aeronautical scholars, as well as NASA’s aerodynamic page instruct that the fluid dynamics prove that the same air molecules do not ‘Meetup’ at the trailing edge; as the air above the wing is moving faster than under the wing. This has been proven and shown in wind tunnel testing using smoke.
If anyone who’s an aeronautical or aerodynamic engineer can please add a notation or further explain this in reference to this article would be greatly appreciated.
I’d do it, but I’m not that advanced to get into the particulars. I only have a fundamental understanding of wing dynamics and forces.
Best Regards,
Dave - gto3deuces@gmail.com GTO3DEUCES (talk) 01:57, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite true, . - Ahunt (talk) 02:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional notation/explanation warranted in 1st paragraph
Talk:Wing tip

message: Which one is correct: Wing tip or Wingtip?--Arado (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We seem to be going with Wing tip, although Wingtip redirects to the same article. - Ahunt (talk) 22:01, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wing tip or Wingtip?
Talk:National Association of Chicana and Chicano Studies

message: The name of the organization which is the title of the page is wrong. It is "For" rather than "of".  This error has been like this for many years. But now that it was reach Facebook, I feel that the name needs to be corrected. Title should read: National Association for Chicana and Chicano Studies Kblackmer (talk) 16:18, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Juan Gómez-Quiñones

message: The content may have some legitimacy. Here is a reliable source:
* http://articles.latimes.com/1991-01-09/local/me-7191_1_chicano-studies/2
Brangifer (talk) 23:33, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I removed it due to the sourcing situation in the article. With a reliable source, we will have to consider whether this is important enough for inclusion; and if so, present it in a neutral manner, including Gomez-Quinones's view of the situation. Based on the one source you provided, I can't immediately see that this is something that should be included, but I don't have any definitive position, as I don't know the wider story and context. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 23:42, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree on all points. I have no particular burden about this matter, but people who make legal threats over actual events documented in RS not only irk me, their threats should be shown to be ineffectual and counterproductive. The Streisand effect can be pretty powerful! Wikipedia will not be threatened into silence or self-censorship. -- Brangifer (talk) 03:30, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted criticism section
Talk:Karamoja

message: Hello. I would like to suggest some changes to the language table to improve accuracy.  I believe the changes I am suggesting follow the common spelling usage in currency in Karamoja.
1.  At the top of the table, the English spelling of the word for the language of Karamoja should be "Karamojong" or "Karimojong" cf. the word "mojong" meaning "old".
2.  Using "Ejoka" (which is properly a question) as "hello" is surely more ngaTurkana than ngaKarimojong (though perhaps used in Moroto town rather than the richer language of the villages). In south Karamoja (Karimojong) one hears more often "ie-ia?" (lit. "are you there?") sometimes with "ijoka?" added - thus: "ie-ia ijoka?" and in Kotido (naJie) almost exclusiveley "ie-ia?" or "ie-ba?".  The reply to "ie-ia?" is "ee, ie iyong dang-a?" (pronounced "ie iyodanga?")Lit. "yes, are you there also?"  If you insist on using "ejok" ("good"), then the initiation would be "ejoka?" and the response would be "ejok" or "ejok-nooi".
3.  Perhaps add "kanyaritae ayong (apaLomita)"  "I am called (Nick)"
4.  the word for yes is commonly spelled "Ee", I believe.
5.  surely good bye should be "ikianyun" "see you" - without the "i" it would just mean "see".
6.  Isn't "water" "ngakipi" in Kotido and "akipi" in Moroto? (presumably it became shortened for some reason as most traditionally known liquids are feminine plural).
7.  "goat" is commonly "akine" (no "h")
8.  properly "ngae?" rather than "ngai"
9.  some mention of the pronunciation of "ng" as in "singer" would be sensible.
Despite what it may appear, my knowledge is pretty basic.  Anyone want to work on a language article? - "Karimojong" and "Karamojong" are currently red-linked.
I propose to make these changes within 2 weeks if there are no objections and will happily discuss if others wish.
Peace
Apalomita (talk) 18:10, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Bentley Turbo R

message: Given that this is a British car, could we get the prices in pounds pse? --kingboyk 18:23, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prices 

message: I recently read a 'retrospective'-style article about a late-production Bentley Turbo R.  It made the claim in an offhand manner that Rolls-Royce had found itself seriously outclassed under the bonnet both in output and cylinder count by the mid-50s, and the failure of Packard (last full year of production was '57, with a partial model year in '58) allowed them to buy the rights to a solid modern V-8 design reasonably.  Thus, all pushrod Rolls-Royce and Bentley V-8s were derivative designs from Packard's OHV engine.  This seems reasonable on the surface, as the first model year for the V-8 in the Silver Cloud II was '59.  Can anyone substantiate this?  --Darwinianphysicist (talk) 00:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Packard origin for Rolls-Royce - Bentley pushrod V-8? 

message: I believe that Bentley Turbo RT should be merged here, as it is simply a more powerful model of the "cooking" Turbo R. I also feel that a lot of visitors are likely to miss out on the Turbo RT entirely, with it being hidden in a separate page. Disclaimer: Favoring this merger will not be interpreted as support for merging all RR Silver Spirit variants.  Mr.choppers | ✎  01:59, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge RT
Talk:Taghachar

message: He submitted to Ghazan but killed soon in Anatolia.--Enerelt (talk) 04:47, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the addition.  Which book did you see this in? --Elonka 06:19, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Could you please doublecheck the year?  The version of the Encyclopedia that I have uses a different one.  Or are we using different books entirely? What is the ISBN of the one that you are using? --Elonka 15:38, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghazan 

message: Page 379 of vol. 5 of the Cambridge History of Iran states only that Taghachar abandoned Baidu, with nothing of his subsequent fate. It is explained on page 381 along the lines I have just put in the article. The Cambridge History does not state that Taghachar was a Governor of Rum, just that he was sent there, nor does it give the year 1297 (only "shortly afterwards" in relation to November 1295). Sam Blacketer (talk) 17:34, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the Cambridge History mentioned incompletely. --Enerelt (talk) 02:34, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the index as well, which showed all mentions of Taghachar between pages 370 and 381. I also looked for mentions in other books but came up with a blank (and the only copy of Rachid al-Din's works that I could find was in Persian). Sam Blacketer (talk) 08:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cambridge History of Iran
Talk:American Association of Christian Schools

message: Our Christian School Students  should be prepared to contribute and have a presence in the Market place. Like Harvard University was founded on and  lost. 2600:1009:B05F:38B8:0:4D:E9F4:2E01 (talk) 17:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Get in the aAmerican Market Place
Talk:Articulation (education)

message: --Many US departmetns of education are signing articulation agreements so that high school students can get dual credit.68.114.136.179 (talk) 00:37, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

message: The word "whilst" and most words ending in "-st" that could have an "e" ending instead, sound foolish to the American ear. Please try to avoid.Student7 (talk) 12:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Whilst
Talk:Air launch

message: Air Launch project remains priority for Polyot company. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 13:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITAR/TASS report 
Talk:Cuautitlán Izcalli

message: Municipal status: If "Cuautitlán Izcalli municipality was created in the 1970s, carved mostly out of Cuautitlán de Romero Rubio", it seems that 1861 for municipal status is an error. This appears to be a mere copy from the article for Cuautitlán. Jim (talk) 17:43, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

message: Content added by  has been removed from this article for copyright reasons. In spite of warning, the individual using this IP has persisted in copying content from copyrighted sources without compatible licensing to Wikipedia. Please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source, whether the one cited or another (issues have been detected from other sources than those named). Based on the editing pattern of this person, we cannot make the assumption that the content is usable. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline. See Wikipedia:Copy-paste and Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/67.184.212.160. Thank you. --💵Money💵emoji💵💸 14:37, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright cleanup
Talk:Airport reference temperature

message: The name as well as the definition in this article deviates from the definition given by ICAO (Convention on International Civil Aviation, Annex 14, Vol. I, 2.4.1): Recommendation.— The aerodrome reference temperature should be the monthly mean of the daily maximum temperatures for the hottest month of the year (the hottest month being that which has the highest monthly mean temperature). This temperature should be averaged over a period of years.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.83.137.158 (talk) 14:18, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:Climb (aeronautics)

message: Does anyone know what the following part of the article is based on.
During long climbs the angle or rate of climb is often reduced. This slows the speed of ascent but increases the speed of forward progress towards the destination, often saving time when taken over the entire journey.
As far as I know a normal climb is always done with a fixed IAS or mach number. Fysics may decrease the rate of climb but this is not caused by an intentional increase of the forward speed.83.81.45.179 (talk) 14:49, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  climb profile

message: The Aerodynamics of a climb as explained in this article is incorrect. A climb is a product of having excess thrust beyond that required for level flight; lift does not cause an airplane to climb.
*why does a climb always has to be the product of extra thrust? I can also climb perfectly well whitout this extra thrust, all i have to do is trade in some speed.Vlieger (talk) 22:41, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if you don't have any extra thrust beyond that required for level flight, you'll stall if you attempt to climb. So I guess one could say climbing "is the product" of having extra thrust... just like one could say accelerating an automobile "is the product of having fuel in it"; however, that's not necessarily the best description. Climbing may be the product of having extra thrust, but that's not what it is. --LjL (talk) 22:46, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A climb can be as small as 10ft and there can be plenty of speed tradable for altitude without approaching stall speed. excess off thrust seems a poor explenation of a climb to me.  I think the only good climb discription is an excess of lift compared to weight. A secondary effect is that the extra lift brings some extra drag requiring extra thrust to maintain speed.83.81.47.12 (talk) 10:19, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: article incorrect

message: When I discovered this article it contained nonsense suggesting a climb is achieved by increasing the lift on the wings! It was all unsourced. This shows the danger of writing new material without having the benefit of reliable published sources.
I erased at least some of the offending material. I will return shortly to do more repair work and supply some citable sources. Dolphin (t) 12:20, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up
Talk:Controller–pilot data link communications

message: *Added interwiki for Portuguese BR Gabrielresendev (talk) 17:54, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwikis 

message: The acronym appears without an expansion as to what it stands for.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.133.22.41 (talk) 18:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  UAC 
Talk:Aircraft deicing fluid

message: Freezing point.  I removed some defective information from this paragraph.  Freezing points increase not decrease with dilution.  As a result, the information provided (undiluted -30 C, diluted -55 C) could not be correct.  Rklawton (talk) 17:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The source you added CLEARLY states that adding anti-freeze reduces the freezing point.  This article, on the other hand, clearly and incorrectly stated that adding WATER reduces the freezing point.  It doesn't.  Rklawton (talk) 22:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

text: My bad.  Thanks for clarifying that.  Rklawton (talk) 02:42, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Freezing point

message: Can I just ask where the abbreviation ADF comes from? I've never seen it other than where it means Automatic Direction Finder.
212.183.128.33 (talk) 15:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ADF

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 21:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Deicing fluid →  – Per WP:PRECISION. The current page name is inadequately precise, as the topic could be confused with fluids used for non-aviation purposes or with in-flight fluid deicing systems. Carguychris (talk) 14:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 March 2021
Talk:Direct flight

message: flying a direct flight can be more troublsome than a connecting flight since people are often unaware of the difference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.29.214.107 (talk) 16:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

message: Hi!  There is a minor dispute on whether Delta's asian flights that pass through Narita and share a flight number with an onward US flight qualifies as a direct flight.  Currently, consensus is leaning against doing so despite this article defining a direct flight as having 1 or more legs under a single flight number.  The reason for why they are against is that flight numbers are periodically re-shuffled among asian destinations.  For example, DL280 goes from Manila to Narita and continues on to Atlanta however on 1 June, the Manila-Narita route will be assigned flight DL617 which continues on to New York's JFK Airport.  Let us clarify this case on whether Delta flights involving Narita are direct flights as far as this article is concerned for consistency. --112.201.32.153 (talk) 12:58, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Destination listing criteria in WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT has no bearing on the definitions of a "direct flight". Their basic criteria are to list nonstop and certain types of direct destinations. Clarifying this article provides no guidance to airport articles. HkCaGu (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delta Flights through NRT 

message: Mr coetzee is taking a direct flight from london to king shaka international airport. 
Explain in the concept direct flight 41.246.30.174 (talk) 14:38, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourism
Talk:Informal education

message: I have tagged this article as lacking a neutral point of view. The benefits and shortcomings of informal education are a controversial topic. This article lists 'Benefits' and 'Advantages' (which is really quite gratuituous praise) without making any mention of criticisms or limitations. I do not wish to disagree that informal education may have benefits. I do not even  wish to disagree that those benefits may outweigh shortcomings. But as Wikipedians, it is our job to maintain the Neutral Point of View.
EditorPerson53 (talk) 01:58, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Neutrality 
Talk:Idaho State Highway 3

message: I added a KML File for this route. Thewombatguru (talk) 10:18, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  KML File added 
Talk:Ferry flying

message: What about delivering the aircraft to its new owner? Isn't this often done by third-party pilots? I'm pretty certian many aircraft in WW2 were delivered to the UK this way. - BilCat (talk) 22:23, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think "flights to move an aircraft from one base of operations to another" would cover that, but that definition is the only one I have been able to source, if you have another ref that adds to this then by all means add it! - Ahunt (talk) 23:15, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the definition of a ferry flight is to deliver an aircraft to wherever it is needed, as opposed to an operational flight. So it would be better to make that clear in the opening line, that it is essentially a delivery flight, of either a new or repaired aircraft to its operator or customer, or of an aircraft from an operator to a maintenance centre for maintenance or repairs. The point is that it is essentially just a movement of the aircraft from one location to another, as opposed to a flight where it is being used for its particular intended purpose.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.253.254 (talk) 11:45, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point! I have added some wording to that effect - see if that is an improvement! - Ahunt (talk) 14:49, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! - that's fine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.254.24 (talk) 17:53, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition in Lead
Talk:Steve Holt (Canadian musician)

message: This discussion page has been created subsequent to the creation of a new article, "Steve Holt (Musician).--Innermusic 18:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is my opinion that getting nominated for a Juno does not qualify you to be added to the sum total of human knowledge.  This person is not famous in any way and this page should be removed from Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Takin23 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is frivolous and should be removed