Talk:.32 ACP

message: I added a reference to a USA Today story which offsets the Hitler/WWI stories a bit I think. :-) --BillyTFried 20:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  USA Today 

message: The Guns section is starting to get out of control. Is it really helpful to list every single gun everywhere the was chambered in a particular cartridge? Arthurrh 19:50, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guns list 

message: I think there is something wrong with the Specifications template. On the article page the bullet diameter is shown as .984 in (25.0 mm) which is the same figure given for overall length. When I click on edit the template shows the diameter as .309, which I assume is correct.
There are similar problems with (at least) the .380 ACP, .38 Special, .357 Magnum, .44 Magnum, and .50 Action_Express articles. I don't know how to fix this but maybe someone could take a look?--Boreas 21:56, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is fixed now. Thanks to whoever did so. --Boreas 17:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifications template 

message: The purpose of the "See also" section is to link readers to other articles that may be related to the topic but weren't covered directly. In this case, having links to the list of handguns cartridges does that, as well as the link to the specific cartridges in the same diameter (IE the 7 mm caliber page). The list is short enough as it stands I don't think it's in desperate need of trimming. Arthurrh 02:28, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also section 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencingand appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 11:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: the article describes that the round was developed for the FN Herstal M1910 by Browning.
And where the pistol's origin is "Belgium" the round's origin is "United States"
To me that doesn't make sense, Browning was in Belgium, working for FN Herstal. He wasn't in the US, or am i missing something here?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.118.140.11 (talk) 18:51, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin US or Belgium 

message: There are far more "7.65mm" cartridges than the .32 ACP and this redirect is not appropriate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.152.206 (talk) 10:12, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  7.65mm redirects here why? 

message: The .32 ACP and the .32 Auto are two different cartridges, but in your article you refer to the .32 Auto as a synonym for the .32 ACP. Have you personally ever held a .32ACP next to a .32 Auto? They are extremely different and one can see this by simply holding them next to each other or by measuring rim thickness or any other case dimension of there choosing. You should do more research and re-edit your article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.229.44.105 (talk) 03:05, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Both major specification standards groups list them as synonymous. Now, I've read reports that European-made and US-made ammo might have slightly different tolerances, but they're still both within the standards. oknazevad (talk) 18:48, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  .32 ACP NOT the same as a .32 Auto 

message: I think the infobox is wrong. Indeed, we can read "Bullet diameter .3125 in (7.94 mm)" on it... 7.94 mm? How is that? shouldn't this be 7.65 mm? Kintaro (talk) 08:43, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  7.94 mm ?