lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories/Archive 1

message: According to this page, CoM isn't out in Australia. But I know it is, as for my birthday in May I bought it at an EB Games (in Australia. Not ordered).
I fixed it up now, so no worries. Just, stop saying it isn't out in Aus. It is. 220.237.189.218 07:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: It ''is'' out in Australia

message: What is the music from the official website called???
--Zeldamaster3 11:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's called "Dearly Beloved". First track on the OST, I believe. Axem Titanium 14:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music
Talk:Stonewall National Museum and Archives

message: The person who conceptualized, founded and nurtured The Stonewall Library And Archives was Mark Neil Silber, one of the earliest and most accomplished pioneers and activists in the South Florida L/G/B/T community. Silber was born on June 3, 1954 in Queens, New York. At a very early age, Silber's family moved to Hollywood, Florida.
Involvement in "the Gay Liberation movement" began in 1972 when Silber was a senior in Nova High School in Fort Lauderdale: within a few years he not only founded the Stonewall Library, was a co-founder of Broward Gay Community Services, Congregation Etz Chaim: Metropolitan Community Synogogue of Greater Miami; founder and first President of the Gay Academic Union of Florida Atlantic University (Boca Raton), was a founder and an officer in the Broward County Coalition for Human Rights, Inc. Mark N. Silber graduated with a bachelor's degree from Florida Atlantic University in 1977. 
After graduating college, Silber "flirted" (his own words) with Democratic Party Politics. For a few years from the late '70's until the early '80's he was on the Executive Committee of the Broward County Democratic Party. In 1980 Silber was a delegate at the National Democratic Convention in New York City.
Today Mark N. Silber lives in Philadelphia, PA, where he was quoted as saying he will continue to "dedicate and devote my life to the cause of Gay and Lesbian Liberation."76.124.107.18 (talk) 03:26, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Silber now mentioned, with citation, in the article as the founder of the museum. John Nagle (talk) 04:50, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founder of the Stonewall Library & Archives 
Talk:KQV

message: Per THIS filing with the Federal Communications Commission under exhibits that states that KQV suspended broadcasting on Dcember 31, 2017 NOT January 1, 2018. YborCityJohn (talk) 03:09, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's official KQV ceased operations on 12/31/2017 

message: I don't think so. From what i heard, whoever owns the station currently, is renewing their licenses every year since they've "ceased operations". So they're still around, basically. 71.206.223.109 (talk) 04:38, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kqv ceasing operations?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League/NFL Draft pages format

message: I've suggested some proposed style outlines for the NFL Draft series of pages. These are based primarily on the 2000 Series of Draft pages used to clean up the style of the entire series by several users over the past few months..
There is some consistancy accross the series, but the sub sections are ofen organized differently. 
Below is my original statement on Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League/NFL Draft pages format page.
 The current series of pages have all been closly formated to be similar. 
 Wikilink First occurance only, Tables sortable, Use of Full Team Names, 
 Use of Positions names not abbreviations, use of Short acceptable names of 
 Colleges. <ref>'s are a bit overboard in the most recent 
 draft pages (2000 and newer). 1936 - 1999 are very similar in style accross the 
 series. Obviously the later 200X Drafts have been Featured or A Class Articles. 
 Many of the early era articles are in need of much help in the Openings and expansion 
 of the Draft data (which is common through the 90's as well) This should be in the TODO list
Slysplace | talk 01:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal for Style guide for NFL Draft Pages

message: I don't know if this was kosher or not, but I have added separate Hall of Fame coloring for a few years (while updating the list to include missing rounds), using the style from the NBA draft page: 
 |-
 | style="background-color:#CCFFCC; border:1px solid #aaaaaa; width:2em;" | 
 | = Hall of Fame
It is nice to see HoF status at a glance within the table & I hadn't noticed the "compensatory selection" anywhere. Let me know if this is a problem.--Diogenes00 (talk) 01:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hall of Fame 

message: This style guide documents a page layout that has been superseded by a new format which uses a series of templates.  This new format simplifies page maintenance and allows editors to make layout changes (to the templates) which will automatically apply to ALL the pages.  A good model for this new style is the 2003 NFL Draft article.  This style guide should be updated to reflect this new page format.— DeeJayK (talk) 02:16, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Style Guide is outdated
File talk:Aly & AJ - Into the Rush.jpg

message: This image is the original image for the Into the Rush CD.  This was uploaded before the other image in question (:Image:IntoTheRush.jpg) by myself (doodoobutter), despite the title "Into the rush cover 2".  The reason for it saying "cover 2" is because I have two versions of the picture in my files: a high-resoultion version and a low-resolution version (the ladder having the title "cover 2").  I re-uploaded this image.  This original image is of low-resoultion (as opposed to the copy image :Image:IntoTheRush.jpg) and has a full explanation as to why it is of fair use and thus should not be deleted. Doodoobutter 01:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This image is the original
Talk:May West

message: I added several informations about this cake that come from the family of René Brousseau, the inventor of the May West (called Mae West at the time). While I am still looking to find other sources to corroborate these information, I would like for the information to be left on the page. Mr. Brousseau is still alive today, but he is in fact quite sick and may not be long for this world. Out of respect for the man, and in recognition of his contribution to the Junk Food heritage of Quebec, I request that the info be kept until I can find other sources (and possibly more information).Archiesteel 01:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: There are problems with the dating found in the cited sources (Vachon web site, Brousseau obituary).
*First about the date of invention. René Brousseau's version says he invented the Mae West during the Second World War. A plausible date would be 1942, but not 1932 (as quoted by Vachon). A WW2-era date seems more likely from a cultural point of view: the influence of the Mae West life-preserver, and the lesser likelihood of such a product being introduced at the nadir of the Great Depression.
*Second problem is about the change in spelling. There exist newspaper advertisements from the 1970s with photographs of the Stuart box with the May West spelling.
A further difficulty stems from the corporate history. Vaillancourt was purchased by Vachon in 1972. Stuart was purchased by Weston at some point, then sold by Weston to Vachon in 1979. It seems plausible that Montreal-based Stuart may have made the cakes under license in the Montreal area, while Quebec-based Vaillancourt distributed them around Quebec City. In any case Vachon would have been involved with them prior to the Stuart acquisition.
Since Wikipedia is not a place for original research, and moreover the research is incomplete, we are left with an unsatisfactory story awaiting further work. — Justinbb (talk) 05:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unresolved inconsistencies 

message: Advertisements for the radio program Nazaire et Barnabé published in the newspaper L'avenir du Nord in August 1939 (available at banq.qc.ca) make reference to the May West by Stuart. So it was already around in the 1930s after all. Was the Stuart version the same as the Vaillancourt version, or are these two separate snacks that later became confused or merged? — Justinbb (talk) 03:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New information 
Talk:Nôm reading

message: I've redirected this page to the Nom article, for the following reasons: 
#so far this article is only a copy-and-paste from the Nom article: let the content stay comfortably in the Nom article, when nothing new has been, or can be, added. 
#both onyomi and kunyomi are redirected to the Kanji article.
#the existence of the Chinese version, I think, cannot justify that of an English version. The 喃音 article should indeed be incorporated into the 喃字 article.--K.C. Tang 01:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of most expensive divorces

message: The divorce settlement is sealed but most sources put it at $50 million. Some say $35-$50 million. It was a lot because he had to sell off Pixar to keep going. JettaMann (talk) 16:23, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: George Lucas

message: Hey, Wikipedians, this is a dynamic list; let's keep it up-to-date and accurate.  Thank you.  ProfessorPaul 01:59, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep this list going

message: The London Times on-line has a top 20 list of the most expensive divorces in history (linked here ).  Problem is, their list is denominated in the British Pound (rather than the American dollar).  If this list can be properly converted, taking the year of the divorce (and the THEN-exchange rate for the Pound to the Dollar), it could be useful.  God save the Queen.  ProfessorPaul 02:38, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Another source

message: Wow!  A $750 million divorce!  Take care.  ProfessorPaul (talk) 04:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated for August 2010

message: Rupert Murdoch's divorce from Anna Mann was formerly listed here as costing him $1.7bn, sourced only to a newspaper column listing it as one of the 'ten most expensive divorces'. An article I just came across questions this valuation, saying he only(!) had to pay around $100m, and specifically claims that our list is inaccurate: Based on that, I've moved it down the list, until we have some better sources that can clear this one up one way or the other. Robofish (talk) 23:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rupert Murdoch 

message: Does not look like a reliable source to me but is used to support four entries in the list. Philafrenzy (talk) 12:35, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: EveryList.xyz

message: Those ought to be numbered, like a league-table. Valetude (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to tabelize it, but numbered ranking is not a good idea, as there is no uniform methodology.--Jklamo (talk) 08:42, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering needed 

message: Any thoughts on the sources warning? It looks like the sources have been pruned if disreputable sources. Any objections to removing that warning? UVemNJvA (talk) 19:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  about sources warning 

message: Agree with previous discussion about no natural sort order. Does anyone agree that a roughly descending ordering might help guide the reader to the information of interest expeditiously? UVemNJvA (talk) 18:27, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  descending order?
Talk:1999 Stanley Cup Finals

message: It appears that, when talking about the own goal, there are two paragraphs that pretty muck explain the exact same thing. Which one should be removed? 24.87.43.151 (talk) 02:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetitive? 

message: At the start of the third paragraph, it is said that "Stars forward Brett Hull scored with his skate in the crease". It is ambiguous whether he scored with his skate, while it was in the crease, or if he scored [with his stick] while his skate was in the crease (the latter being the correct one). It is pretty significant because it can change the controversy from scoring with one's skate to the actual one about the rules in place at the time about the players not being allowed to put a skate in the goaltender's half-circle.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FA49:D83A:AB00:9A41:B0A2:E44:39D7 (talk) 13:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity
Talk:1996 Stanley Cup Finals

message: Regarding this edit: please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Archive66#Removal of quotes sections from Stanley Cup Final articles, and the previous discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Archive64#Quotation sections. Based on strength of arguments, there is at present a consensus not to have a separate section for quotes. Please join the discussion at the WikiProject Ice Hockey talk page to discuss the matter further. isaacl (talk) 15:05, 30 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotes section 

message: I have started a discussion at the WikiProject Ice Hockey talk page regarding aftermath sections. Any feedback is welcome. isaacl (talk) 22:00, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  aftermath section
Talk:1993 Stanley Cup Finals

message: :merge from 1993 Stanley Cup Riot
Yup, I agree and intended to merge the information like was done for the riot this year. -Djsasso (talk) 19:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: As the current contents of this section is not directly related to the outcome of the 1993 Stanley Cup Finals, I'm struggling to justify its inclusion in this article. I can see the relevant parts possibly being included in the team history articles, but it seems too far afield to be considered as aftermath. I suggest deleting the section, pending someone providing content that is directly relevant to what happened immediately after the Finals. isaacl (talk) 06:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is also unreferenced, although there is little to dispute. Are there other cup final articles with similar sections? Hwy43 (talk) 09:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

text: Yeah I would probably remove it. -DJSasso (talk) 12:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There are aftermath sections in the articles for 1992, 1995, 2003, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2010. There may be more as I only went back to 1980. Hwy43 (talk) 06:57, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Are they reflective of the aftermath of the finals, such as "Savard was not re-signed by the Canadiens"? Covering the actual consequences of the finals is reasonable, but I don't think such a section should be a catchall for anything that happens to any of the participants at any time in the future. (In this case, also something that didn't happen to a general category of teams to which one of the participants belongs.) isaacl (talk) 13:48, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aftermath section 

message: The section currently states:
:"Fans poured out of the Montreal Forum and began to commit acts of vandalism and violence while their team was celebrating inside." 
Surely not every rioter/vandal was a fan that attended the game, and surely not every rioter/vandal was genuinely a fan of the Habs. I suggest it be reworded as follows:
:"People poured into the streets of the city and some began to commit acts of vandalism and violence while the Canadiens were celebrating inside the Montreal Forum."
Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 09:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I could go either way. It isn't untrue that fans poured out of the Forum. And it doesn't really claim that everyone was a fan. But I can see trying to tone it down. -DJSasso (talk) 12:52, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it is more accurate to clarify that the rioting was not necessarily originated by fans exiting the Forum. (There's a good chance the 1993 riot was primarily initiated by fans, but quite possibly from bars as well as other viewing locales.) isaacl (talk) 13:15, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reworded it as proposed above. Hwy43 (talk) 06:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riot section
Talk:1989 Stanley Cup Finals

message: I thought the Rangers defeated the Maroons at the Montreal Forum, for the 1928 Stanley Cup. GoodDay (talk) 18:57, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup.  I think the statement was intended to refer to the Canadiens only, but I have clarified. Resolute 23:42, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rangers & Maroons in 1928 

message: I believe this was the first Finals in which the finalist wore these patches. GoodDay (talk) 03:00, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stanley Cup Finalists Patch
Talk:Warlocks Motorcycle Club (Florida)

message: I reverted the change in category from Motorcycle Club to Motorcycle Gang.  The Warlocks are, in fact, a motorcycle club.  The term motorcycle gang has no concensus definition.  Mmoyer 02:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gang vs. Club 

message: Having a single page to describe two distinctly separate 1% clubs, simply based on the fact they share a name, doesn't make a lot of sense.  
The New York Giants football team and the San Francisco Giants baseball team might as well share a page since they're both called the "Giants." ChargersFan (talk) 20:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't enough solid research in this to justify one article, let alone two.  Almost everything here is based on self-published web sites, broken links to missing YouTube videos, and original research.  Or hoaxes.  Going and creating another article based on any of this is a terrible idea; better to delete all save what can be verified with good sources.--Dbratland (talk) 20:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, the article should be deleted altogether.  Both clubs should not be crammed into the same page simply for having the same name, especially in an article with so little supporting/verifiable information. ChargersFan (talk) 15:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs to be split into two different articles 

message: "Gudkneckt escaped and in a very un-biker moment, went straight to the police to report the crime."[3]
This is incorrect information on this event. Craig was still handcuffed when he escaped, and was picked up by the Police while attempting to get back home.
Big Ear Bunny (talk) 00:01, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Information 

message: I'm looking for my sons godfather who not only rides for you guys but he also carries his name, I'm looking for Boo Dan as his god son David-Lee has been asking about him. I think he is going to pop the question to his long time girlfriend but wants Boo Dan to be in the bachelor party. Anyway if any one has seen Boo Dan let him know "Quake" is looking to see him. Thanks and ride on !!,! P.S. He can catch me at theedjquake@gmail.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.182.108.162 (talk) 11:17, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: These problems appear occasionally in Wikipedia, but this is not the place for them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.48.194.160 (talk) 15:18, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for my sons godfather 

message: This page in particular seems to suffer frequent vandalism, I would suggest locking the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.81.199.193 (talk) 17:17, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frequent vandalism 

message: There are two Warlocks Motorcycle Clubs, this one in Florida, and a different one in Pennsylvania. They have different origin stories. Consequently, I have replaced the WikiProject Pennsylvania banner with one for WikiProject Florida. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 05:10, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Florida, not Pennsylvania
Talk:Louisiana statistical areas

message: Population data from the United States Census Bureau may be updated either:
:(1)  Every ten years with data from the decennial United States Census, or
:(2)  Annually with data from the decennial United States Census and annual population estimates from the United States Census Bureau.
The following table shows when population data is available:
United States Census Bureau Population Data
Source:         	Decennial Census                 	Population Estimates
Date:           	April 1 of years divisible by ten	July 1 of years not divisible by ten
Region:         	date population data available   	date population data available
nation          	December                         	December 1
state           	December                         	December 1
statistical area	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
county          	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
places          	February-March of next year      	June 1 of next year
Please contact me if you have any questions.  Yours aye,  Buaidh  21:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population updates 
Talk:Zhao Yingcheng

message: Are the "scrolls" mentioned in the text Torah scrolls? If so, it might be a good idea to state that explicitly. Thanks for an interesting article. LordAmeth 06:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Youtai: Presence and Perception of Jews and Judaism in China By Peter Kupfer
http://books.google.com/books?id=hCJNQPszu5sC&pg=PA39#v=onepage&q&f=false
Dictionary of Ming Biography, 1368-1644: [Mingdai Mingren Zhuan] By Association for Asian Studies. Ming Biographical History Project Committee, Luther Carrington Goodrich, 房兆楹
http://books.google.com/books?id=067On0JgItAC&pg=PA123#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 05:17, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another source for the article 
Talk:Row vector

message: As I have read the convention to write collumn vector elements separated by commas, then the row vector:
:\mathbf x = \big[ x_1, x_2, \dots, x_n \big].
is indeed a column vector. 
Another mistake is the transposed column vector (used commas), which is called column vector, but it appears to be row vector.
I don't change the main text, just I am puzzled. I have never seen this comma/space notation, usually I think that the comma idea is "ugly", because it can slip from one's attention, exacly as is the case with the current Wikipedia entry. The same error is also made on the column vector entry.
Danko Georgiev MD 02:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there's a convention according to which elements separated by commas indicate a column vector. If there is, it is highly questionable, and conflicts with a non-standard notation for row vectors (see article). I edited the text to solve the problem. Alternative notations for column vectors should not be given here, but in the column vector article (see also Talk:Column vector). Paolo.dL (talk) 11:40, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable alternative notation 

message: Row vectors and Column vectors are rank 2 tensors.  Simple vectors would be rank 1 tensors.  And yet the discussion of row [and column] vectors doesn't even hint at this distinction -- wikipedia does not seem to have any discussion of the topic anywhere?  (We have "coordinate vectors" but no basic discussion of the underlying concept of "vector" as a mathematical concept as distinct from the conventions of physics.)
Where does this discussion belong?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.54.131.7 (talk) 15:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should simple vectors be distinguished? 

message: Observations on matrix concatenation when applied to inputs of the row or column nature result in preference for row input. This substantial matter is under discussion at Talk:Shear mapping. Comments are invited on either of these discussion sites.Rgdboer (talk) 21:49, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preference over column vectors