lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Alderney pound

message: The page Banknote of Alderney should be merged into this article. It has been only one sentence long since its creation over 5 years ago, and as it is about a single rare bank note I cant see there ever being enough information on the subject to warrant an article of it's own. Sarahj2107 (talk) 16:33, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge complete. xlynx (talk) 11:52, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: This currency is listed as 'Defunct' in the 'Currencies named pound or similar' template - presumably it isn't? --87.254.86.112 (talk) 13:34, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I just noticed that as well. True, it isn't in general circulation, but as commemorative coins are issued, it can't be called defunct. I'm going to change the template. Jellyman (talk) 14:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct?
Talk:Mach principle

message: "...eleven distinct statements which can be called Mach principles, labelled by Mach0 through Mach10". Then the article goes on to list twelve principles, labelled Mach0 to Mach11. Which is correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.104.156 (talk) 18:07, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counting error
Talk:William J. Sewell

message: Regarding the move of this page, William J. Sewell (42%), W. J. Sewell (24%), William Sewell (23%), and William Joyce Sewell (6%) are the only iterations of Sewell's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com in New Jersey. Star Garnet (talk) 05:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Talk:David S. Stanley

message: ... since the name is quite common. There is at least one more WP-worthy manof this name, David J. Stanley, scholar - see http://www.jstor.org/stable/1291732?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Arminden (talk) 20:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "David Stanley" needs a disambiguation page
Talk:10538 Overture

message: Sorry, but saying that this is cello rock just based on the instrument is wrong - when you look at the article dedicated to cello rock here on Wikipedia, you will see that this definition is related to solely metal music. Please remove it. 93.80.71.208 (talk) 15:28, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cello Rock?
Talk:Abby Mallard

message: "(She) has a secret crush on Chicken Little."  Mmm, possibly; this is not stated openly in the film.  However, Chicken Little does have a secret crush for her, and reveals this at the end of the anagnorisis scene, just before the action climax of the film.  Thus, I removed it, preserving it here.  --BlueNight 07:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sweet Talkin' Woman

message: Well, which one is it? Stonemason89 (talk) 23:38, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: #17 or #18 in US

message: If charts from Denmark, Ireland and New Zealand are notable, then the U.S. is entitled to have up to 50 charts listed, as each of those nations are smaller than metro Chicago and most U.S. states.  America has one-third of a billion people, so it is not over the top to have four or five listed.-JGabbard (talk) 16:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart inclusion 
Talk:Tennessee in the American Civil War

message: The opening portion reports "Tennessee would furnish more troops for the Union than every other Confederate state, combined." I live near Gettysburg and visit the NMP frequently. I was fascinated when I saw a diorama in the "new" visitors center detailing how many northerners joined southern regiments and vice versa. It would be fascinating to read more about this. Maybe I'll have to do the research!!! PurpleChez (talk) 17:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  northern regiments 

message: The old lede didn't summarise the main article, and there was nowhere in the article to re-insert the cites which I deleted because I don't think cites belong in the lede. I have supplied a new lede which I believe summarises the story, and it is the main article that I feel now needs attention. Valetude (talk) 18:28, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New lede 3/8/19 

message: "On January 1, 1863, Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation freed slaves in states still in rebellion against the United States. Tennessee, although a seceded state, did not fall under the provisions of the proclamation. Tennessee was under Union control, and Andrew Johnson was serving as Military Governor." This quotation is linked to in Emancipation Proclamation, footnote 6. But I don't see it mentioned in the present article. When did Tennessee come under Union control? Maurice Magnus (talk) 12:03, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tennessee under Union control 

message: The map is labeled "Map of the Confederate States." The most glaring problem is the map includes Missouri and Kentucky, which never joined the Confederacy, they wereBorder states that remained loyal to the Union. Second, the map includes Arizona Territory and Indian Territory (modern day Oklahoma), which weren't states at the time, and would be more accurately described as territories claimed by the Confederacy. 99.111.255.214 (talk) 99.111.255.214 (talk) 18:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map in the infobox is wrong.
Talk:Turn to Stone (Electric Light Orchestra song)

message: If charts from Denmark, Ireland and New Zealand are notable, then the U.S. is entitled to have up to 50 charts listed, as each of those nations are smaller than metro Chicago and most U.S. states.  America has one-third of a billion people, so it is not over the top to have four or five charts listed.-JGabbard (talk) 16:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess you're referring to the Radio & Records thing. This is probably worth a wider discussion. If the basis for inclusion is purely charts per capita, then yes, it's silly that Belgium gets two (both Flemish, even) and the U.S. gets limited to three. Having said that, I don't think that Radio & Records is as notable as the other three. Yes, it was used on Casey Kasem's show but that's because Westwood One owned R&R, not because R&R was independently awesome. But in the end, I really don't see the encyclopedic value of having multiple charts per country in the first place; what deep insight am I to gain from learning that this got up to 9 on R&R but got to 11 on Cash Box? I wish that there were just one per country, because what I really want to know is how popular a song was in a given country without having to involve myself in the vagaries of each publication's ranking criteria. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 19:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Radio & Records charts are non notable in any way and the Billboard, Cash Box and Record World charts (which were all published by notable/official music magazines) are enough to show this song (as well as other Electric Light Orchestra songs) were successful in the US. Synthwave.94 (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart inclusion
Talk:We Were There (manga)

message: Does anybody have any concrete evidence of the episode count? Posts on 2ch don't even mention an episode count. Once I get enough writeup done to flesh out this entry, I'll post it up there and change the episode count to reflect an unknown end.
This manga is so far 10 volumes long and still running so I strongly doubt the 13 ep count to be true. They're going at one manga chapter an ep right now, so 13 eps would probably put us at manga volume 5 (episode 8 finished up manga volume 3). I'm looking forward to this page becoming very informative since this series apparently isn't very popular (yet!).Nekotsukimi 04:52, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Count 

message: Was copied entirely from the ANN entry, so I removed it per WP:CP. Can anyone who has seen/read this series write a new plot summary? Ninja neko 17:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: The plot contains too much spoilers.  Especially the part about Yamamoto and Yano's past and them having sex. Not ure if that's an issue.
: It's self-evidently that the plot section is going to discuss the plot. Hence it's only natural that it contains spoilers. Ninja neko 10:48, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers 

message: Given the manga came first and the anime was adapted from it, the article should give the manga plot first, in detail, then discuss how the anime differs from it. —Quasirandom 22:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of plots 

message: I have carelessly tried to add citations to the article without actually reading how to, and while I somehow successfully added two, one of them is unneeded. I don't want to touch the article any more, so if someone would please remove the citation at the end of Nanami's description I'd appreciate it. Sorry! --85.250.37.254 (talk) 15:48, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry! 

message: CWR vol. 11 Mania.com vol. 8 --KrebMarkt (talk) 06:47, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s) 

message: I think it would be better to discuss the plot and the major characters separately, what do you think? I would be willing to take care of that.Eva Mitocondriala (talk) 23:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary
Talk:Do Ya (The Move song)

message: Needs a cite. Good thing they didn't go with it or you wouldn't hear it now. --Fantailfan 15:04, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Look Out Baby, There's a Plane a-Coming"? 

message: The article claimed that "Do Ya" is one of the few ELO songs to contain a profanity. I have removed this claim, as "Oh No Not Susan" on an earlier album, On the Third Day, contains a much worse profanity. Ringbark 12:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do Ya 

message: Todd Rundgren’s Utopia speelt het nummer op het album Another Live uit 1975. 62.195.127.19 (talk) 08:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed! I've added it now. JezGrove (talk) 16:31, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do Ya
Talk:Rockaria!

message: The article states: Featuring the operatic voice of Mary Thomas during the introduction, she flubbed the first take by starting the vocals too early. However, Jeff Lynne elected to use the take (complete with her interjection, "Oops!") anyway.
It is clearly there, although it could just be ooh rather than oops  - never knew it was a mistake, always assumed it was a deliberate bit of business.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.193.198.230 (talk) 09:33, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operatic "oops" 

message: I can't be the only one who believes the entirety of the introduction looks like it was plagiarised from somewhere. Can anybody identify the source? The section is going to need quite a rewrite. I am the 0dd1. (talk) 21:20, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism?
Talk:William Paul Jarrett

message: Wonder if William Jarrett (1814-1880) is related? Sailed on Charles Wilkes' voyage and clerked for Robert Crichton Wyllie.
* 
I found William H. Jarrett died January 25, 1903 born something like 1854, was this one's father. Could be missing link. I did find from Bergin's book on Parker ranch: Emma Stevens father was whaler Captain Charles Stevens, and mother was Kealiiwahamana (Hawaiian). William Jarrett had a brother known as Paul Lapaula Jarrett who managed Parker Ranch in 1888.
W Nowicki (talk) 23:41, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Related?
Talk:Loudon, Tennessee

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Loudoun, Tennesse. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  ComplexRational (talk) 17:05, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Loudoun, Tennesse" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Lenoir City, Tennessee

message: Would it be appropriate to add something about the woman that spent time in jail due to the messy yard ordinance? See Woman Jailed Over Messy Yard | LibertyNEWS.com. Sam Tomato (talk) 21:40, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really.  Would violate WP:NOTNEWS.  Bms4880 (talk) 19:28, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messy yard 

message: Would it be appropriate to note that for some time (1953-2012), Yale was headquartered here? 
KJ4IPS (talk) 19:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Yale

message: Town creek parkway now terminates into Harrison Rd./Ave. I assume that the paragraph regarding that should be updated, but I am unsure what sources should be given, or if any are necessary. Suggestions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KJ4IPS (talk • contribs) 18:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town Creek Parkway Completion 
Talk:Lincoln L. McCandless

message: Remove Find a Grave as a reference. I would have placed it in an external links section but the link was not proper. Consensus has determined that Find a Grave is an unreliable source by one or more of the following;
*1)-WP:SOURCES; Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy.
*2)- WP:NOTRELIABLE; Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or with no editorial oversight.
*3)- WP:SELFPUBLISH; Find a Grave is user edited and uses anonymous or pseudonymous editors.
*4)- WP:SPS; This includes any website whose content is largely user-generated, including the Internet Movie Database, Cracked.com, CBDB.com, and so forth, with the exception of material on such sites that is labeled as originating from credentialed members of the sites' editorial staff, rather than users. Find a Grave is not currently specifically named as is IMBd but falls under "and so forth". Rational dictates that Find a Grave, while not specifically listed by name in WP:SPS, certainly falls under the criteria. Otr500 (talk) 21:09, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Townsend, Tennessee

message: I rewrote the intro, with a better description of Tuckaleechee Cove and its relation to the city of Townsend.  Other changes:
1.  Removed the statement regarding Cartwright's.  I couldn't find a source, and without a published source, the statement could be considered libelous.
2.  Added a more extensive history section detailing the town's Cherokee history and its history as a logging camp.
3.  Added a more detailed description of US-321 as it passes through Townsend.
The article also needs a better source for the two THC marker citations.
Bms4880 18:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to article  4/21/2007 

message: The text gives "These windows form when erosional forces carry away the older rocks (mostly sandstone), exposing the younger rock below (i.e., limestone)." This is counter-intuitive.  There's probably a need to explain why the older layers are on top of the younger layers. Bill 01:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Geology
Talk:Seymour, Tennessee

message: I question the statement that the CDP is in the Knoxville MSA. It is centered in Sevier County, which is not part of the MSA (but is part of the CSA). Is there a good source of info on this?--orlady 14:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed mention of how long it takes to get to the GSMNP from Seymour, as it will vary widely according to traffic on the Parkway.  On Black Friday, it may take an hour to get through Pigeon Forge alone.  I've also touched up the part about Newell's Station.  The confusion over whether or not it was the capital of the State of Franklin (it wasn't) is probably due to a misreading of the historical marker in the photo.  Bms4880 (talk) 00:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Knoxville MSA?

message: According to the Sevier County Schools website (http://www.sevier.org/schools.html), there are 3,035 students in the 4 Seymour schools and another 559 at Boyds Creek.  The census information says there are 8,850 residents with 24.3% under the age of 18.  That's 2,150 kids. 2,150 is not close to 3,035 or what most people in the area would argue is more accurate of 3,594 (including BCE). That still doesn't include all the kids in Blount County or private schools, or for that matter, any children too young to be in school.  Now, I know that the census is the more encyclopedic way to go about this, and that the information from the Chamber of Commerce does not meet Wikipedia's standards.  At the same time, I don't want people to be misled to truly believe that there are less than 9,000 people in Seymour when it is much more logical to follow the Chamber's number of about 13,500 people in 2000 (http://www.seymourtennessee.org/info.html).  There are probably much closer to 20,000 people that would consider themselves to live in Seymour.  When we're dealing with an unincorporated community, does self-identification not offer a more accurate representation than census information or administrators from Ohio?
Rhodesgomer (talk) 19:00, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: IMHO, the issue is not "what is the population?", but "what is Seymour?" People who live there have one idea about this and the Census has another. CDPs are statistical constructs. They are supposed to correspond to reality, but like any other federal government invention they are likely to be imperfect.  The population of the Seymour CDP in 2000 is a verified fact that needs to be reported as such. However, the place that currently is regarded as "Seymour" by people in the area is an unincorporated community that apparently covers a larger area than the CDP. For example, it appears to me from the map that the CDP does not include Boyds Creek. Also, population may have increased since 2000, both in the CDP and the larger area. Accordingly, I think it is reasonable to point out that the Chamber of Commerce contends that the "real" population (of a larger area that the Chamber considers to be "Seymour") is larger than the CDP population. This should not in any way detract from the census data. --Orlady (talk) 23:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Population
Talk:Samuel Wilder King

message: Public domain image needed for his later life, a more age appropriate image. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 10:47, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Maryville, Tennessee

message: I'm not seeing how it goes into the city limits. Does anyone know for sure? 67.168.160.168 09:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't reach Maryville's city limits, but it's a very important road for Maryvillians and Knoxvillians trying to reach Maryville.  It connects the north end of Alcoa with West Knoxville.  Bms4880 22:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I-140

message: Something needs to be here about the attempt at downtown renewal (70s-80s) and the building of the skywalk system, which was a very ambitious undertaking, albeit with little noticeable success.  75.200.37.120 (talk) 01:04, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Downtown renewal / Shywalks 
Talk:Norris, Tennessee

message: My apologies if this has already been mentioned, but isn't this question decided by the boundary as given in the "Location" column?  It's described as "City of Norris on U.S. Route 441".  No references to "Bounded by" or "Roughly along" or specific street names or addresses.  It seems to me that this proves that the HD boundaries and the city limits are identical.  Nyttend (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Your pointing to that earlier might have been helpful, but in this case there was evidence, to start, that the Norris District was very different from Norris the town.  The mention of City of Norris in the NRIS database does not "prove" anything, although it is a strong suggestion.  The NRHP.COM source for the evidence of difference was the same source that had been used by some merger participants here in merger proposals elsewhere, and it was regarded as an accurate source.  Without that, I agree (as I have stated elsewhere) that an NRHP HD which is described as being roughly or exactly a town should be merged with the town article.  Or at least that should be the default, with deference to anyone who actually does the work to develop the article(s) and who might choose to separately discuss the HD (for any of various reasons: to cover the HD in more detail than is appropriate in a town article, or to get away from unsourced material and controversy in a town article, etc.). doncram (talk) 21:34, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: We need a section break
Talk:Elizabeth P. Farrington

message: The two citations for this article have confliting data.
The rep history website states that she first took office on August 4, 1954, while the directory of the united states website states she took on July 31, 1954. I hope someone with more knowledge of this subject can determine which is correct. 
--Jamo58 (talk) 02:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  two citations conflict
Talk:Rocky Top, Tennessee

message: I removed a discussion of this topic from the article. MADDOG3200 said "The Duggar family from TLC's "18 Kids and Counting" are residents." 74.246.214.3 added "The Duggar family are NOT residents of Lake City, TN.  Their friends, the Bates family, live there." I (Orlady) have heard that they are from northern/eastern Anderson County, but I don't know where. They might be worth mentioning in the article, but let's sort out the situation here rather than arguing on the article page. --Orlady (talk) 16:00, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Duggar family website at http://www.duggarfamily.com/ says they live in Arkansas. --Orlady (talk) 16:06, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Duggar family
Talk:Clinton, Tennessee

message: In an edit summary, orlady noted that this paragraph:
Violent confrontations, and Clinton High School was bombed in 1958 (Tennessee Historical Quarterly, Vol LVI, p 294-307).  Although Clinton officials often claim racial violence was the result of "outsider" interference, research shows that the actual source of the conflict was the result of a threat to "well-defined and familiar patterns of social interaction" (such as racial superiority, referenced in Tennessee Historical Quarterly, Volume LVI, pp. 294-309).  Instead of being external, these problems were "internal and contextual: threats to racial hierarchy" (Tennessee Historical Quarterly, Volume LVI, p. 307).
is POV.  I agree, so I'm moving it here to the talk page.  The citations are admirable, but to be NPOV the paragraph needs to be reworded to show who holds the cited opinions.  All this will take is looking up the citation, but perhaps the person who wrote this paragraph can add the names and save someone a trip to the library?  --Allen 21:39, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the sources cited in Clinton High School, namely http://tennesseeencyclopedia.net/imagegallery.php?EntryID=C111 and http://www.knoxnews.com/kns/local_news/article/0,1406,KNS_347_4497096,00.html , are appropriately factual. --orlady 22:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV desegregation paragraph 

message: I made several changes, including expanding or rewording several sections to make them more specific and complete.  Two issues remain:
1.  I can't make sense of the sentence, "which eased after the Treaty of Tellico in 1798 (including an origination point for the land to be relinquished from the Cherokee being the Tellico Blockhouse) allowed for greater ease in settling the area."  Are you trying to say the treaty moved the U.S.-Cherokee boundary south to Tellico Blockhouse?
2.  The statement, "the current vice mayor of Clinton and Clinton High student at the time, admitted he was not for integration but would abide by the law" is badly in need of a citation.  It's potentially libelous without one.  The vice-mayor's name should also be included, since vice mayors often rotate in and out of office.
Bms4880 (talk) 22:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes, 2/21/2008

message: Pearls 2600:1702:4850:18D0:ADA1:BB61:AD4C:1E4 (talk) 04:21, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fresh water pearls 

message: Greetings! Regarding this revert, I was simply mirroring the content at Clinton High School (Clinton, Tennessee)#Integration. Do you know if that material is supported by the documentary cited in the next paragraph? -- Beland (talk) 03:38, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reopening in 1960