lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Constitution of Puerto Rico

message: Renowned law professor Antonio Fernós, the son of PR Constitutional Convention chairman Antonio Fernos Isern admitted in an El Nuevo Dia artcle today that Gov. Luis Muñoz Marin chose July 25 as the date to proclaim the Constitution as a ploy to overshadow the prior reason for celebrating a holiday on that day, the arrival of US military troops to PR n Guánica on July 25, 1898.  Following is the relevant text:
Exactamente 54 años antes, el 25 de julio de 1898, las tropas de Estados Unidos invadieron Puerto Rico en el marco de la Guerra Hispano-Americana y conquistaron el País que hasta entonces era colonia española, si bien apenas comenzaba a obtener un tímido grado de autonomía bajo la Carta Autonómica de 1897.
Muñoz Marín habría escogido esa fecha como “una forma disimulada de quitarle al 25 de julio el toque militar de celebración de la invasión y en un sentido reclamar que izábamos la bandera nuestra”, sostiene el profesor de Derecho Antonio Fernós López-Cepero. El profesor escuchó la versión de boca de su padre, el doctor Antonio Fernós Isern, presidente de la Convención Constituyente.
En la década del 30, el gobernador Blanton Winship, comenzó a conmemorar la invasión con un desfile militar “como muestra del poder americano frente al nacionalismo albizuista”, explicó Fernós. Luego de 1952 se celebraba el ELA y no la invasión, agregó.''
Secretary of State Kenneth McClintock and Constitution Day keynote speaker and former Gov. Carlos Romero Barcelo highlighted this admission today as an important historical fact long suspected but never previously confirmed.  I have included a reference in the article. Pr4ever (talk) 23:42, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why July 25? 

message: The Congress, in approving the Constitution, required that it be amended to exclude certain texts.  That significant fact is not addressed by the article.  It should. Pr4ever (talk) 19:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed Endercase (talk) 22:58, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Do you have any sources that cover this? -- 16:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excluded text 

message: We really shouldn't have the whole text listed here, that is what Wikisource is for (which is linked at the bottom of the article). The article should be reduced to briefly summarize the text based on reliable sources coverage on the material to maintain notability standards. Having more sources and less "non-notable" information would be very helpful in improving the quality of this article. --Endercase (talk) 16:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Depth of coverage

message: This article says that the original title was in Spanish. Is the whole text in Spanish ? Or in both Spanish and English ? -- Beardo (talk) 23:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language
Talk:Forest kingfisher

message: I think that there is a "Forest Kingfisher" image dump on the "Collared Kingfisher" page, but it is difficult because of the variety of the "Collared Kingfisher". Can anyone confirm the species in this image :Image:Collaredkingfisher seq.jpg? Snowman (talk) 17:11, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi Snowman, definitely a Collared, from Wynnum Mangrove Boardwalk near Brisbane Airport (Forest doesn't usually show green colouration in their plumage - normally a royal-blue) Aviceda  talk 18:09, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image id
Talk:Red-backed kingfisher

message: Hi Cas, just noticed you seem to have the wrong bird under Taxonomy.....as you are currently working on the page, I'll leave the edit to you.... Aviceda  talk 02:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: oops. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:26, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In related news, apparently I fail at editing today -- point is, no snark intended on the edit history. Melchoir (talk) 00:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Forest? Kingfisher
Talk:Fortean

message: Charles Fort is the primary topic for this term.  All of the other entries on the page are derived from his work, and they are also all partial title matches which would not be referred to as simply "Fortean".  Does anyone have any objections to changing this dab to redirect to Charles Fort? Nick Number (talk) 19:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles Fort is the primary topic
Talk:Madagascar hoopoe

message: "U. marginata" "U. e. marginata" The problem should be evident. I know we have to stay neutral, but we clearly have both views in the taxobox. Pick one, remove the synonyms section, and leave it to the text to go over.Capra walie (talk) 14:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic Taxobox
Talk:Long-tailed ground roller

message: "It is also threatened by both hunting and egg-collecting." Egg-collecting? What does it mean? Collecting of eggs by indigenous people for food or  collecting of eggs by oologists? I'm not sure that second possibility is right. Hunu (talk) 19:00, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservation 

message: Recently I have been working on Madagascar articles, especially rivers and bridges, and getting the talk pages updated by quality and importance. I added  to this article talk page, but I am curious why FA talk pages are not examined for needed WikiProject entries. Madagascar is very much needed for this article.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 20:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk page update
Talk:Windhaven

message: I wanted to note that this novel was originally published by the Timescape Books imprint of Simon and Schuster, but my edit was reverted. I believe this is a highly notable fact, as timescape was an important publishing force at that time. its being an imprint not an independent publisher should not be of concern i believe. As a good wikipedian, i am assuming good faith, and will not revert again without discussion.(my edit was done not logged in)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:12, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Publication history
Talk:Shehecheyanu

message: "Melech Haolam" should be translated to "King of the world"--Nitsansh (talk) 18:35, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily. While in Modern Hebrew "olam" means "world", in the Jewish liturgy "universe" may be more appropriate. "Olam" fairly clearly refers to the universe as it is now, as opposed to "olam habah", the messianic "world to come". Mo-Al (talk) 23:57, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in translation 

message: The transliteration of the last two lines seems a bit off to me:
: שֶׁהֶחֱיָנוּ וְקִיְּמָנוּ וְהִגִּיעָנוּ לַזְּמַן הַזֶּה׃
: she-ecḥeyanu ve'qi'eh'manu va'higiy'anu laz'man hazeh.
Most of those apostrophes, one h and one y appear out of place.  A literal (albeit archaic) rendering is shehechĕyānū vǝ-qiyyǝmānū vǝ-higî‘ānū lazzǝman hazzeh.  Likely someone can improve on that. —Tamfang (talk) 05:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  transliteration
Talk:Lesser yellow-headed vulture

message: I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of October 21, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: The article is well written, personal pet peeve of mine may be too much use of "it" as opposed to naming out the species in each new paragraph.  Ideas flowed and the prose was engaging and kept me interested.
:2. Factually accurate?: The article is accurate and factual based on the sources and my own knowledge of raptors.
:3. Broad in coverage?: The article is thorough enough under the Good Article Guidelines.  I feel it could go higher.
:4. Neutral point of view?: The article adheres to NPOV.
:5. Article stability? The article is stable with no vandalism or edit warring.
:6. Images?: The images are great and really illustrate the subject matter.  From drawings of the animal to maps of its range.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations. 
— Mike Searson 03:51, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Successful [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] nomination
Talk:Av HaRachamim

message: The title says:"Av HaRachamim", the body text: "Av Harachamim". Why the difference? DTBone (talk) 22:42, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistency?
Talk:Ein Keloheinu

message: source:  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.245.218 (talk) 20:01, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: שלום! And thanks for bringing this to someone's attention. I'll admit my Hebrew is very rusty, but I have changed to text as best I can to reflect the original piece. קשה להיות יהודי --Avicennasis 04:39, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

text: You are confusing two words, moshiach (with a chet) which means "anointed", and moshia (with an ayin) which means "savior". "You are our savior" is the correct translation of "ata hu moshieinu".  Zargulon (talk) 11:00, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where did it came from? When was this song written/the approximate date it emerged?--Baruch ben Alexander - ☠☢☣ 12:13, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hirtory
Talk:2007 Wests Tigers season

message: What is the point of this page? All the information can be found on the Wests Tigers page itself and the rest is located on the National Rugby League season 2007. A season summary is all that is required, in my opinion. Florrie 00:39, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication
Talk:Kedushah (prayer)

message: What about the actual translation of "Kedusha", meaning "holiness"? I think it would also help to add some kabbalistic commentary of kedusha. for instance when is the terminology used biblically? why is it used? how does it relate to G-d's other relationships with the world (IE Shechina}
Ao far all we're talking about is the "kedusha" section of the amida. I think more is needed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Summguy1 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about the translation 

message: Why is the title of this article spelt with a final silent "h" instead of the more usual "Kedusha"? --Redaktor (talk) 11:45, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Reasons for the failure of British Caledonian

message: Have now completed reorganising this sub-article - incl. the linked main article - a bit over the recent Bank Holiday week-end. Hope the result makes for better reading. Another way to reduce the complete article's size is to use the same referencing system as in the Air Europe article as well as to "tighten" it a bit further or, alternatively, to subsume it into a newly created, separate sub-article for the period when thinks at BCal began going downhill (ie sections entitled Unexpected reversal of fortunes to British Airways wins the day - to be found in the sub-article entitled British Caledonian in the 1980s). Maybe, other Wikipedians with an interest in aviation articles could help with this. This sub-article (and the linked main article as well) contain[s] a lot of detailed information that I personally consider very informative and therefore valuable. So, someone who knows how to tighten it further without simply deleting all that info, without changing the meaning completely (by leaving just a few disjointed sentences) and without making spelling or grammatical mistakes should preferably do this. Aviator369 (talk) 20:55, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganising the article
Talk:Monoglyceride

message: aren't 1-monoglycerides and 3-monoglyerides technically different species due to the stereochemistry around the sn-2 alcohol (R?)?  i think i've often seen them referred to in the literature as 1/3-monoglycerol because it's difficult to resolve them using standard techniques. Roadnottaken 00:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1/3-monoglycerides?

message: I have undone yesterdays change by 174.102.132.7 as the 'unnatural' comments are both unreferenced and directly contradict the previous paragraph stating that they "are formed biochemically via release of a fatty acid from diacylglycerol by diacylglycerol lipase". Also, it is factually incorrect that 'unnatural' glycerides are equivalent to trans fat. While trans fats are typically unnatural, it is not their unnaturalness that makes them 'trans'. 'Trans fat' simply means that the double bonds in 1 or more of the fatty acids in the glyceride are arranged in the trans formation rather than the cis formation. 
Harperska (talk) 02:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Undoing unreferenced change
Talk:Kiddicraft

message: (Luna Kid (talk) 10:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tyco

message: see  http://news.lugnet.com/general/?n=54084
I have asked the author to consider helping make this article better. If he declines... The material in that posting appears to be well sourced (references are given at the bottom) and the sources could be tracked down and used to improve this article although the text in that case should not be used. ++Lar: t/c 00:46, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a photo of a "Kiddicraft" brick (white) with some modern Lego bricks (grey), for comparison:  ErkDemon (talk) 21:33, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: *  http://www.brightontoymuseum.co.uk/wiki/File:Kiddicraft_and_Lego_bricks.jpg
I assume "Lego eventually required the rights to Kiddiecraft" should read "Lego eventually acquired the rights to Kiddicraft". –Screwtop (talk) 02:55, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Although they also realized that they required it... 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 23:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section at Hilary Fisher Page#Kiddicraft largely contains the same content here. I think we're better off de-duplicating, and I think we can simply redirect this page to there. Alsee (talk) 20:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps redirect/merge
File talk:EverQuest Coverart.png

message: Is the original EverQuest (1999) front cover box art a painting by Larry Elmore as claimed here? Link to Keith Parkinson getting credit for it: http://www.asfa-art.org/chesley/2000/product/parkinson.html and http://eqplayers.station.sony.com/images/in_memory/EQposter_1152x496.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.84.85.204 (talk • contribs) 20:42, 24 July 2007
:This looks like an error, it originally said Parkinson but was changed in this edit. I've changed it back. --Mrwojo (talk) 09:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Subdivisions of Prince Edward Island

message: Why does St. Louis lead to this article about a highway? Highway 156 (Prince Edward Island) Dincher 00:50, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question.  I've changed it to a redlink.  — Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 01:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: St. Louis

message: Sorry for the ignorant American here, folks, but what exactly is a "royalty"? The term isn't linked on any of the articles, and the DAB and wiktionary for "royalty" don't mention anything about towns or lands of any type. So enlighten me, what makes a township a "royalty"? VanIsaacWS Vexcontribs 09:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royalty?
Talk:Philippe Lardy

message: My reasoning for tagging the article for having too many examples is evident in this sentence:
Draws for the New York Times, Newsweek, Time Magazine, Rolling Stone, The New Yorker, The Atlantic Monthly, The Village Voice, Town & Country, Men's journal, Esquire, Vanity Fair, The Boston Globe and the following companies: The World Bank, Pepsi, Levi's, AT&T, MTV, Saatchi & Saatchi, Arista Records, Bluenote Records, Simon & Shuster, Penguin, Random House, Grove Press, Citibank, Houghton Mifflin, Bloomingdale's, Disney and more.
That's quite a mouthful. The other tags speak for themselves.
Lardy's illustrations, while not to my taste, are rather interesting and I hope that someone with more knowledge of the subject can make this into a better article. —Travistalk 00:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your attention to the article. I can tell when something is wrong, but I have absolutely no doubt that I'm not qualified to write art criticism. That subject is certainly best left to someone more expert than I. Cheers! —Travistalk 03:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Shadowban

message: * Keep - Does anyone contest the existence of the "shadowban"?  It's a veritable phenomenon, popularized mostly by disgruntled users of Fark.com, especially those who owned a paid subscription.  Shadowbans are, simply put, when forum administration chooses to "hide" comments made by certain users unbeknownst to the shadowbanned user.  Shadowban-ees are free to post comments at will, except that no one else (besides the moderation/admin staff) will actually see them.  This method is particularly frowned upon by the Internet community mostly because of its disenguousness.  Also, this method gained particular notoriety on Fark.com because paid members ("Totalfarkers") were unwittingly paying to post comments that no one else could see.
There is no reason not to include this very real phenomenon, save for special interests.
* Keep if you want Wikipedia to have integrity: It's been 7 years since the original discussion. Shadowbanning is a common enough practice now to warrant an entry in Wikipedia. Reddit is the #1 news site in the world according to Alexa , and it shadowbans. Another popular site that shadowbans is Tumblr. A Google search of "shadowban" returns 30,700 results.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.222.89.125 (talk) 05:35, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Antipornography Civil Rights Ordinance

message: There's basically almost no discussion as to the reasons for strong opposition by civil libertarians to this "civil rights" approach to pornography regulation and the nullification of this law by the courts on First Amendment grounds. Many people consider this approach to be as much (if not greater) a form of censorship as traditional obscenity law. Nadine Strossen, Wendy Kaminer, and Nat Hentoff are all notable authors who have have critiqued this proposed law and their views should be included if this article is to be considered at all balanced. Peter G Werner 04:44, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV tag

message: The section on definition of pornography is hinged on a reference to it being about women. The section should be redone to represent both genders as both men and women are represented in pornography. Any objections? —Zujine|talk 21:16, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I must strongly object to the proposed edit. The definition presented here is explicitly cited as being a legal definition created by Dworkin, et al specifically. While you might disagree with that definition (as I do), removing it from here would result in the article being factually incorrect and hinder the study of the philosophical basis for the Antipornography Civil Rights Ordinance. Jaydubya93 (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of pornography 
Talk:Custody suite

message: This page strikes me as very UK specific. Indeed, it mentions PACE which clearly only applies in the UK. I think that either some information from other countries should be included, or the title should be altered to make it clear that this article only discusses UK Custody Suites. I appreciate that 'Custody Suite' may (or may not?) be a UK only term, but there are still certainly equivalents that could and should be referenced. --199.4.27.122 (talk) 10:56, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: UK Specific Information
Talk:Zoosexuality/Archive 1

message: From the article: "Bestiality means simply, the sexual act of a human having sex with a (non-human) animal."
This definition sounds rather strange to me and the sentence doesn't flow too well in my opinion. The dictionary definition (bestiality: "Sexual relations between a human and an animal") I also find dodgy. In my eyes, bestiality means: "a person performing sexual acts with or on an animal." BabyNuke 20:24, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A good point. Is this any better? Zetawoof(ζ) 20:50, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That sounds more like it BabyNuke 09:53, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Technically that would have to be "A sexual act", as it refers to the act not the person. FT2 (Talk) 10:54, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of bestiality
Talk:Kent, Illinois

message: 79 people. 48 dogs. I am absolutely overcome with the hilarity of that sign. It is something I failed to notice when shooting the photo. : ) IvoShandor 15:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha, I have heard about the sign, but didn't finally get to see it until I saw your picture. So should that be a total population of 127? haha.--Kranar drogin 22:44, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dogs
Talk:Operation Avalanche (child pornography investigation)

message: Thanks for the heads-up on Jim Bates.  I've added a bit more and another reference. Pkeets (talk) 22:17, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further developments 

message: So Thomas could have gotten 5 years in prison, but because he faught charges, he got 1,335?! I'm no law expert, but that sounds way beyond belief. I've never even heard of murders, or even serial killers getting more then a few hundred years or so. This has to be vandalism, right? 97.114.135.219 (talk) 04:36, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1,335 years?!
Talk:Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections

message: A couple of comments. I realize that this article is somewhat of a stub but really does not address the historical significance of the treatise (in fact it spends more time discussing the history of its Western discovery than it does discussing its significance as a mathematical work). Also, there is ongoing debate regarding the extent to which Chinese mathematics was influenced by discoveries in the Mediterranean and India (apart from any direct evidence some scholars argue that since much of what this and other Chinese texts contain was known in the Med more than a millennium earlier there had to be some transfer of knowledge which influenced the text). These things should be discussed in the article to be more complete.
--Mcorazao (talk) 18:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical significance 
Talk:ThinkUKnow

message: ThinkUKnow was just a program of the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Command. Today's sources mentioning ThinkUKnow refer to a similar program in Australia. Shouldn't we should merge this page ThinkUKnow into the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Command? Finersinger (talk) 02:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Child Exploitation and Online Protection Command
Talk:Travis Kauffman

message: It is highly offensive to describe the statutory rape as "consensual."  The victim was only twelve. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.81.114.162 (talk) 01:39, 25 July 2007‎ (UTC)
:I also noticed several sentences mentioning criminal activity. Since the entire section had no reliable source I have removed it. -- John of Reading (talk) 06:21, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Industrial loan company

message: The article says that, under the Morris Plan, borrowers agreed to repay loans through "purchase of Installment Thrift Certificates in weekly installments equal to the face value of the loan, less origination and investigative fees."  It seems impossible that borrowers would agree to make weekly payments nearly equal to the amount they borrowed.  If they could do that, why borrow in the first place?  
Jdcrutch (talk) 20:05, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: While rather poorly worded, it's correct, but it could be stated more clearly by rephrasing to mention that the sum of all of the weekly installments is equal to the face value of the loan.  Basically, your emphasis slightly changes the meaning of equal to from "all of which are equal to" to "each of which are equal to".68.54.0.181 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 12:06, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Description of Morris Plan? 