Talk:Karaim language

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:45, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Flicker- Karaim language in Arabic script near Menorah (Hanukkah) - Trakai Island Castle - Lithuania1.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Dear User:Yoshiah_ap after extensive search I could find no reference to back up your insertion except sites which quoted directly your insertion in this article. I found a quote directly to the contrary, but it says Karaits not Karaims. However Libor Valko seems to equate Russian Karaits with Karaims, so I inserted the references even though this seems wrong. But do you have any evidence to the contrary which might show that Karaims and Russian Karaits are indeed two completely distinct people? If so please feel free to revert my edit. YuHuw (talk) 10:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Russian Karaits vs Karaims

message: I have just finished an initial clean-up of the article and notice a cibtradiction between whether the crimean dialect is endangered or extinct. If anyone has more info on this please comment or add refs. Thanks! YuHuw (talk) 13:11, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Endangered or extinct

message: "no thanks" is not an appropriate response to a request for discussion. Consensus means something we can all agree on besides something which is RS or good grammar which are things which must stay regardless. So I am asking you and your Tag-team to re-consider the group tactics you are currently employing (harassment and bullying). Instead, let's all engage in constructive discussion to improve these frankly horribly messy articles which your unfathomable protectiveness has gotten me extremely curious about. YuHuw (talk) 07:58, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no tag-team.  There is a consensus.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Consensus is something that everyone agrees on. We are clearly not there yet. YuHuw (talk) 12:24, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia:Consensus says "Consensus on Wikipedia does not mean unanimity".-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct but it does say about unanimity that "although an ideal result, is not always achievable); nor is it the result of a vote. Decision-making involves an effort to incorporate all editors' legitimate concerns, while respecting Wikipedia's policies and guidelines." Let's see if we can work together on trying to reach that ideal and discuss in detail the issues which might bring an obstacle to that ideal. YuHuw (talk) 21:17, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

text: OK I see, so your response to a request for you to engage in discussion to establish a concensus on the sources is to "attack" me with a sock-puppet investigation instead. That seems very bad faith of you. Making a fake case to prevent their own editing being examined. I will have to mention this of course. Everyone familiar with the history of this case will realize that your claim is not relevant to sock puppetry. I just want to ping someone here to see the chronology of events if you have time user:wbm1058. YuHuw (talk) 12:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

text: So that  is your only response. I see. YuHuw (talk) 20:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The only thing you have discussed in this section, is that you perceive yourself as a victim.  Nobody else shares your perception.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:46, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Rather than calling me a victim, would you care to comment on the sources issue please? This is the 5th time in this section that I have asked. YuHuw (talk) 05:24, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: I hope I am not Talking to myself

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Karaim language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071228105622/http://www.turkiye.net/sota/karalit.html to http://www.turkiye.net/sota/karalit.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071126131635/http://www.turkiye.net/sota/karaim.html to http://www.turkiye.net/sota/karaim.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:25, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: as stated by the title, there is no o /l/ in consonant table but L's in the various scripts and as part of the linguistic examples in morphological transcription  --- simply forgotten to add it in?
188.192.37.76 (talk) 09:05, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The apparent omission is still there. On https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karaïm the /l/ is mentioned, but not the /w/. There are a few other differences as well.Redav (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No /l/ in consonant table, but in the examples 

message: — Assignment last updated by IntrepidError (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Study of Language

message: In the sub-section of language ecology, Distribution of Karaim speakers. I added a citation to Crimea, Lithuania, and Poland to show that there are Karaim speakers in that country according to the 8th reference being Csato. IntrepidError (talk) 20:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karaim speakers' citation added 

message: 16:15, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on the peer reviewer's suggestions, I intend on adding more citations and hyperlinks to the missing parts of the article (each section is missing at least one), specifically "Hebrew" and "Crimea." I already added a few, but I plan on adding more. I will also look into the possibility of adding specific examples about phonology, morphology, and syntax and some images about the language, which may be a little challenging but I will look into it. Also, the article could use less wordy sentences in order to be more clear and concise, I plan on reading through the article again and using the peer reviewer's examples of wordy sentences to see if I can shorten or clean them up a little. Additionally, finding information that is up to date about how many individuals are left speaking the language could be added in order to improve accuracy. Present sources that I have found are not peer-reviewed and/or are out of date. If I am unable to find available sources stating the current number of language speakers, then unfortunately, I may not be able to revise this suggestion. Overall, the need for citations, updating citations that are in the "further reading" section, adding missing or updating incomplete ideas into the article, and being more concise are main themes in the peer reviews that I hope and aim to improve the article with.   Frenchsilkpie (talk) 17:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

text: The changes that I plan to make based on the peers' suggestion as well as overall would be to add citations. Since the article is missing citations in different sections of the article. As well, adding examples for the syntax, morphology section. Also making sure to re-read the article and making sure is concise and not to wordy for other people that is reading the article. Sduran2 (talk) 02:38, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

text: Looking at the peer review suggestions that have been noted would be that the entire section could use a lot more citations to certain areas such as morphology, syntax, or phonology. Other things that could be added to the article would be a few images as the lack of them kind of makes the article a bit bland to look at. For changes to be made on the article it would be best to make some sections seem a lot less wordy to read. IntrepidError (talk) 19:16, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiEd Students: Respond to Feedback 

message: In the subsection "Language Contact", I added a citation to the term code-copying that was from a textbook. Ak24000 (talk) 20:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karaim Language Citation Added 

message: Found a reading about the Trakai Island Castle and how Karaim is being used. Added the source to Further reading and added some sort of citation to the end of the section found in the intro. IntrepidError (talk) 20:54, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trakai Island Castle Further Reading