lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:ProjectExplorer

message: Reposting the page after a significant rewrite. This film series has several unique segments, and has garnered international attention in several publications. As such, the focus is on the content provided, as in a television series or radio program, instead of the company itself.
In particular, the cultural and artistic aspects of the series provides information and performances that are not publicly available in other places. For example, ProjectExplorer captured a lesiba player on film, which was a key reference to that wiki article. The instrument and music segment filmed in South Africa records historical instruments and performances that are vital to the country's living history.
Further content and detail will be added to enhance the article as additional information is published. 
Edwardcampbell (talk) 02:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Newport West (UK Parliament constituency)

message: A by-election is expected in Newport West, but has not been called and may not happen (a new general election could supersede it). A number of candidates were selected by parties in advance of Flynn's death to be their candidates at the next election, be it a by-election or a general election. One party, since Flynn's death, have announced their intention to stand someone in the expected by-election. Given the by-election hasn't been called, no-one has actually been nominated as a candidate. It is possible that any or all of those parties will, by then, choose to nominate someone else or not nominate anyone at all. Other parties will probably stand.
A results table for the by-election has been added, deleted (by me), re-added and re-deleted. We obviously are some way from results. Given the uncertainties described above, per WP:CRYSTAL, I think it's inappropriate to start putting a partial and possibly wrong list of candidates in a results box with no results. Wait until we have results, or at least until people are actually formally nominated and accepted. Bondegezou (talk) 18:14, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Fully agree. Nothing yet needs to be added. Whatever was added might well be misleading. It might even be seen as being politically biased. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:29, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  By-election
Talk:Newton (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I've  showing Lancashire from the infobox. This is because none of the Newton constituency fell within the area highlighted in red, i.e. post-1974 Lancashire. Most of the former constituency now lies in Greater Manchester (Wigan M.B.), some in Merseyside (St Helens M.B.), and some in post-1974 Cheshire - the present Warrington U.A. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:55, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Wenhu line

message: Why does the route look so inefficient between Zhongshan Junior High and Songshan Airport? – Kaihsu (talk) 22:30, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah: zh:松山機場站#.E8.B7.AF.E8.BB.8C.E7.89.B9.E8.89.B2 – Kaihsu (talk) 15:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  strange route
Talk:North Dorset (UK Parliament constituency)

message: UKIP and Green Party results were wrong way round. Have corrected.
83.67.41.128 (talk) 18:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Lib Dems are the first political party to announce their candidate in North Dorset (Gary Jackson). There's also a guy called Ash Leaning who is showing up on an obscure Reform UK page as running for them in 2024/5, but this hasn't received any media coverage. Do we wait for all candidates to be announced, or do we put the candidates in as they arrive? POLARIS183 (talk) 16:44, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally if you have reliable secondary sources, you're good to go. doktorb wordsdeeds 17:33, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  2024/5 general election - first candidates announced
Talk:Daan District, Taipei

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Early closure as an uncontroversial technical move request. (closed by non-admin page mover)  feminist (talk) 03:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Daan District, Taipei City →  – Propose move to match title with other districts in Taipei such as Zhongshan District, Taipei, also following naming convention. Twoggo (talk) 21:48, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 July 2020
Talk:Harry Wilson (actor)

message: Sorry (also sorry for my english), 
where do you know from that Wilson had this disease. It's not an often disease and people who had this, mostly don't work. They also mostly died young, while Wilson was over the clearly avarage for mans in 1977 with his 80 years. --Clibenfoart (talk) 16:26, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Talk:International Year of Languages

message: This page is about an International Year, declared by the United Nations General Assembly in May 2007. It is a stub and needs further information, but has basic references and information to get it going.--A12n (talk) 02:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Just noticing this section, which seems to belong to another article and not this one. I think a list of IYL initiatives around the world (including in Europe), with outlinks would be a positive feature. However, unless there are objections, I'll try find a more appropriate page to move this section to - possibly European Commissioner for Multilingualism, Languages of the European Union, or something else (ideas welcome) - and link to that page. --98.169.138.38 (talk) 20:14, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved this section to SOCRATES programme. Its content is important, but it is not topically appropriate for this article. Perhaps a link back to it would be appropriate. --A12n (talk) 12:24, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  European Union Funded Language Projects 
Talk:North West Norfolk (UK Parliament constituency)

message: An afd debate for Manish Sood concluded that the article should be merged with United Kingdom general election, 2010. However, the content of the stub article seems too trivial to be added to the main UK election article and is likely to be removed the moment it is added. The normal alternative for cases like this is to move the sourced content to the constituency article, namely here. Are there any objections? Road Wizard (talk) 00:48, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that the closing conclusion was correct since two people suggested merging it here, one to the general election page and one person to either page. Regardless of that, this is where any info belongs. Valenciano (talk) 05:37, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Manish Sood
Talk:Internet Initiative Japan

message: The significance is that it is that they provide the internet tunnel from Japan to the States. Without this company the U.S. would not have direct access to Japanese websites. It's only a stub right now because I don't know that much about them besides the one point but I wasn't just going to put that. It's meant as a starter for an article. Also, even if it wasn't that important in the States it still doesn't mean it doesn't belong on Wikipedia Zephalis (talk) 02:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Significance

message: I followed a link here from Lapsiporno.info, this service was brought up because many of its websites are being censored by Finnish ISPs in response to a police blacklist which cited it as a child pornography site. This is flawed because the sites blocked were for things like tea sets and hobbies, they were not even sexual at all apparently. Has there been any response in the news to this censorship from Finland that could be noted here? I am not sure if the issue is big enough to link back there. Tyciol (talk) 19:37, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability increase

message: Since links to NASDAQ and Tokyo Stock Exchange are present, the company is deemed to exist. I am therefore removing the template seeking citation for verifiability. If need be, users are welcome to add other tags that to refer to other specific concerns. --Bxj (talk) 03:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deemed verifiable

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Internet_Initiative_Japan&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  lovkal (talk) 13:02, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mother Superior (disambiguation)

message: The term 'mother superior' should not be capitalized any more than 'plumber', 'professor', 'priest', 'king' or 'president' should be, except when used as an honorific. It's a job description, not a title, except when used as a title. This is a very common error on Wikipedia pages. Could someone please redirect the capitalized version to a non-capitalized one, rather than vice versa? Thanks. Alpheus (talk) 02:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization

message: Does anyone object to redirecting this page to abbess, and locating the disambiguation page at Mother Superior (disambiguation) (currently a redirect to this page)?  The majority of links to this page appear to refer to the term in reference to an abbess, making it seem to be the primary topic. -- Natalya 16:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to [[abbess]]

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 04:11, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Mother Superior →  – Although there are minor variations in the office title, the clear primary topic is the office, not the defunct band or the songs or the like. Move this page and redirect the current title to Abbess. BD2412 T 04:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 February 2022
Talk:UTC+11:00

message: We must change the name of that section to "As Standard Time" since it would be more confusing if one would read it. If you don't want to remove it you may do this: As Standard (Non-DST) Time". -Pika ten10 (talk) 02:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Change name of section As Non-[[Daylight Saving Time|DST]] Time
Talk:Gnits standards

message: The Gnits Standards look to be obsolete and unmaintained.  Do we really need this article on them?
74.237.230.9 (talk) 03:03, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an article on Windows 3.1, so why not? Being obsolete doesn't mean it doesn't need an article. 190.188.178.151 (talk) 21:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

message: This article was PRODed, and perhaps rightly so given the lack of third-party references in the article, but I'm pretty sure there must be some out there.  Gnits conformance can, IIRC, be invoked via a command-line option to the various GNU Autotools and therefore must be documented in various books and articles on same.  If I'm wrong, I have no problem with the article being deleted. —Psychonaut (talk) 11:56, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As I said in the prod, that's the extent of the notability. That single line can be added to the GNU Build System article and we don't lose anything. That's probably what I'll end up doing. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 12:24, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  If the standards are documented in third-party manuals, then that should satisfy the notability requirements.  If the article is to be deleted, I suggest it go through the normal process to give others a chance to come forward with the references, if they exist. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The GNU Coding Standards contain much of what was in gnits, but gnits as a document has not bene updated for a long time. See preface on the Wayback machine, which states, "The Gnits (non-)standards are moribund. We leave this online purely for historical purposes; they have not been updated in many years and we have no plans to do so. So cross-references may be broken, etc. These days, the Gnulib, Autoconf, and Automake manuals, cover many of the topics written about here, and are actually maintained."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.94.156.210 (talk) 23:13, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion
Talk:Jacques-Cartier National Park

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the pages at this time, per the discussion below. If hatnotes are unable to solve any ongoing issues here, individual move requests away from ambiguous titles may still be warranted. Dekimasuよ! 00:51, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
*Comment I've requested that Jacques Cartier Provincial Park be renamed, see talk:Jacques Cartier Provincial Park -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 07:05, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 December 2014 
Talk:Le ménage moderne du Madame Butterfly

message: This article has aroused my curiosity (and only my curiosity, thankyou very much) such that I'd quite like to watch the film. I assume that as a 1920 film it's now out of copyright; is it likely to be available online anywhere? 81.187.153.189 (talk) 23:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you can find it online if you google things like "vintage French porn", "1920s French porn", etc. It's usually included in compilations. Jean-Jacques Georges (talk) 07:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Available online anywhere? 

message: The film is titled Le ménage moderne du Madame Butterfly.  That is not correct, if we followed French spelling rules (as the Waugh quote points out).  But that is the title of the film, and should be the title of this article.  The page move is horribly inappropriate. - Tim1965 (talk) 14:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of the film, title of the article 

message: The title exists with a "de"; every single french source uses this form or the condensed "Madame Butterfly", and IMDb also uses it now. I don't know where the "du" came from but it is in all probability a transcription error that has been propagated uncritically, since it is only found in english texts. French wiki has changed the title to "de" , IMDb has changed to "de", I think it's high time this article was renamed "Le ménage moderne de Madame Butterfly" - there's no reason to think that the "du" form is the correct one (if there ever was one), so favoring the original language usage, and the grammatically correct sentence, seems like the sensible thing to do. DommageCritique (talk) 09:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title, 2024 edition
Talk:UTC+06:00

message: What areas in Russia use UTC+6 time? Please put it in the article. -Pika ten10 (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Be specific
Talk:Mont-Tremblant National Park

message: Which is it? It looks like it is managed by a provincial agency, but it is called a national park. Does the province or the national government administer it? Mang (talk) 20:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the provicial agency, but the parks in Quebec are labeled national park since 2001, so we use this term. Before 2001, it was named Mont-Tremblant Recreation Park. --Fralambert (talk) 01:13, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  national park or provincial park? 
Talk:David Wolfe (actor)

message: I have removed the statement that he was the romantic partner of Tommy Tune, as this is the wrong David Wolfe. The confusion stems from not only the identical names, but the fact that both men died in 1994. Tune's partner was choreographer David Steiger Wolfe, who was born in 1954 and was only 40 when he died according to published obituaries, while this David Wolfe was born in 1915 and was 79 years old at his death..Lilipo25 (talk) 02:14, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Tommy Tune's Romantic Partner 

message: This page was about the actor David Wolfe. Tommy Tune's article mistakenly linked to it as the David Wolfe who was engaged to Tune and died of AIDS; that was actually choreographer David Steiger Wolfe. I corrected the error in July of 2019 (above). Another user, , subsequently removed most of the information from this page and made it about David Steiger Wolfe instead, although it still says (Actor) in the title, and DSW was not an actor at all. In addition, the actor DW's IMDB page is still linked.
You cannot simply blank the content of a WP:BLP and make the page about someone else with the same name you would prefer it to be about. I have reverted the page to being about the actor David Wolfe. If anyone would like to create a page on choreographer David Steiger Wolfe, they are welcome to do so. Lilipo25 (talk) 04:09, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest deleting the current 'David Wolfe (actor)' page as it is about the person known at some point in his career as David Bauer and is available on the wiki. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Bauer_(actor) Rigg (talk) 03:06, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I redirected it instead of deleting. * Pppery * it has begun... 13:45, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Serious problems with this article
Talk:Northampton North (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Does anyone have a turnout figure for the 2005 election? Lstanley1979 (talk) 12:29, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Turnout
Talk:Northavon (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Who is Thomas Beacham? BillMasen (talk) 00:04, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the independent 
Talk:Norwich (UK Parliament constituency)

message: If the MP elected in 1852 is Edward Warner (1818-1875) - the source I have to hand is F. Boase, Modern English Biography (1892-1921) - then what reference is there to support him being Sir E. W.? Dsp13 (talk) 01:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edward Warner
Talk:Norwich North (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Watching BBC election coverage, due to boundary changes, it would have been classified as a Conservative hold, rather than a conservative gain. I'm not familiar with how these things are worked out on Wikipedia, but in any case, leaving it here.Park3r (talk) 03:29, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 1983 election
Talk:Nottingham (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Francis Pierrepont is listed on here twice, forty-odd years apart. The article is definitely on the 2nd entry, but what should the first entry be changed to, redlink Francis Pierrepont (...)? Unsure what to put in the brackets. Boleyn (talk) 19:34, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Francis Pierrepont
Talk:Nottingham East (UK Parliament constituency)

message: This article lacks results for this period. The article needs improving in layout and content. KlickingKarl (talk) 23:53, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 1955 - 1974
Talk:Nottingham North (UK Parliament constituency)

message: He's standing!--86.29.142.96 (talk) 10:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The word is "Candidates", and get a source. The election has not been called and unlike local elections it costs money to stand in the general, once the deposit is down then the candidates can be added. Darrenhusted (talk) 11:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candadates. 

message: The reference used for the table, http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/guide/seat-profiles/nottinghamnorth, differ quite a bit from the figures used on the BBC website = http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/election2010/results/constituency/d40.stm. I'm going to change it to those as many other constituency pages on wikipedia use this as a reliable source. KlickingKarl (talk) 15:10, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 results 
Talk:Nottingham South (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I am currently working to improve this article as per Wikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies/Style. I will do my best to avoid making a mess. --86.129.34.241 (talk) 12:48, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Boise State Broncos

message: I know it's not confirmed yet, which is why I'm not putting it on the main page, but this link says that Boise State will be moving from the WAC to the MWC. Any other confirmation out there? Trvsdrlng (talk) 17:11, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible conference move?

message: I have had to research this myself recently and I believe I can add a lot more cited info to the section about the fight song, including previous incarnations (from BJC days, etc). Also, if the legal end of it permits, sheet music MIGHT be able to be added. Such info might also include authors, the student contest involving the fight-song after the post-BSU move. Would the info be worth including in this article? OrangeJacketGuy (talk) 00:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding Fight Song Section
Talk:1208 (band)

message: I have just wrote the article about 1208's hiatus and also removed the possibility about a new album. Right now their guitarist Neshawn Hubbard is playing in The Viewing Era and 1208 do not have any plans for a new album because they're on hiatus and there has never been any official news about a new album, even when their official website went down.  RaNcIdPuNkS 03:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hiatus 