lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eamonn Coleman

message: I have classified this as a stub although it is a borderline start. It needs a photo. Capitalistroadster 09:25, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification

message: I have classified this article as a start due to its level of detail. There is room for further expansion and a picture would be good. Capitalistroadster 23:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start

message: There was also an article on Eamon Coleman and I have seen references to him in the media. Which is the correct spelling? Capitalistroadster 23:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eamonn Coleman
Talk:Charmeuse

message: Does anyone know when charmeuse was first produced? I am comparing some of my vintage, satiny items with a contemporary charmeuse blouse and it appears that my old things are satin, rather than charmeuse. It's not easy to distinguish between the two with complete certainty, however. The vintage garments are heavier, though this may be due to the fact that synthetic fibres were still relatively new at the time the garments were made--perhaps it was difficult to make very fine rayon threads? Xanthippe 09:25, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

message: In the lede, it says "the warp threads cross over four or more of the backing (weft) threads."
I don't know what is meant by "backing" in the context of weaving, but this language implies that the weft is somehow 'static', and the warp does the crossing. I've not come across charmeuse before, but weaving is weaving, and it is the warp that is static (as explained in Warp and weft). 
That remark in the lede is not taken from some cited remark in the main body, as is normal procedure; and the remark in the lede is itself not cited. I therefore propose to remove it. MrDemeanour (talk) 13:35, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the remark. It seems to be at odds with the description at linked Satin weave, which is slightly more complete, and slightly less confusing. MrDemeanour (talk) 10:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warp and Weft
Talk:John Lachs

message: Opened up the John Lachs page.  Lachs has been a mover in American pragmatism for decades, and is a prolific writer and speaker.  It's going to take a while to gather up all the source materials, and I believe I will need some help filtering for the best representative links.  All help is appreciated. --Domhail 09:40, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ARX (operating system)

message: I undid the move, primarily because 'Acorn' was misspelt. I'm not convinced in any case that the current title is too "vague" and that any modification is needed, unless there's another operating system called ARX? Anyway, the name of this OS is not "Acorn ARX" (or "Acron ARX"), so I would have thought ARX (Acorn operating system), or similar, would be more appropriate if a move is necessary. -- Springy Waterbuffalo 09:40, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Arcon ARX (operating system)]] [sic] 

message: --trevj (talk) 20:03, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject RISC&nbsp;OS 

message: I'm reverting from Mach-like to Unix-like. This is because:
*Mach-like is not an article in its own right
* states  As the current parameter refers to a kernel, it should be replaced by the family instead. 
--Trevj (talk) 10:38, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  OS family
Talk:Municipalities of East Timor

message: This  was only a provisional result, the final results can be found here: . I  will edit here the table, more has to be done by someone else, cause I have to change all German articles. --J. Patrick Fischer 09:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Subdistricts" are called "Postos Administrativo" since 2014 and "districts" are now "municípios". , . Greetings, --J. Patrick Fischer (talk) 05:47, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New names 
Talk:Republican Party of Arkansas

message: I am removing a quote from the party chair in Arkansas.  It isn't relevant to a small article on the organization itself.  If Mr. Milligan's comments are worthy of being published in this manner, he should have his own page, as he is notable.  I am not arguing for notability.  Furthermore, the article, as it stands with this quote, is not written from a neutral point of view, IMO, and should be edited.  I will edit but would encourage discussion here if anyone has disagreements with this edit.  Many thanks, CorpITGuy (talk) 20:51, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing quote 

message: Is there a functioning Republican Party in AR?  I can't seem to find much evidence that there is one.  Why isn't there even a GOP candidate for the Senate in 2008?  The article should address this. Bry9000 (talk) 22:11, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two-party system in Arkansas or not? 

message: I will be removing the 'position' infobox. It is unsourced as well as includes very generalized, not agreed-upon, and cursory overview of the party. In addition, the main articles for the Republican and Democratic parties purposely do not include this infobox in order to limit POV pushing. Norge17maii (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Position' Infobox
Talk:Lists of American films

message: Are there any guidelines in place specifying which actors (and more importantly, how many actors) should be included under the "Cast" category for the film lists?
Killjoy966 02:25, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: late response but this list looks like its ripped of from imdb.com, and we all know how acurrate imdb is. I think Afi.com would be better start. 31.209.152.222 (talk) 01:37, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Talk:When It's Love

message: The text reads as if it was taken from some ad targeted at a low IQ audience. The chart posistions, as stated, are either wrong (see subject) or stretching grammar beyond its limits. --217.226.78.92 (talk) 11:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I corrected the name of the chart. As for the rest of the writing, you're welcome to edit it. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 14:09, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can a single hit the album charts? 

message: Power ballad is not a genre musical, please! is a format of single!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.95.113.94 (talk) 14:23, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The well-referenced article for it would disagree. Doctorhawkes (talk) 14:25, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the point was that while "power ballad" is a definable term, like say "drum solo", it is not a musical genre. I'm not saying I agree, but it is a debatable point. And as long as it is agreeable that "When It's Love" is a power ballad, I don't know why it's worth quibbling about. Redrkr (talk) 16:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Power ballad
Talk:Global Agenda

message: Silly ClueBot, stop protecting the vandalism! Xjph (talk) 09:06, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ClueBot

message: Someone put this page up for deletion, it is obviously a mock page and serves no purpose on Wikipedia. I don't personally know how to put up a speedy delete requestKilikman (talk) 13:41, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: I can't find anything saying that Global Agenda is published by Microsoft Game Studios. In fact, it's on steam and is using steam as its primary method of distribution. If it was published by Microsoft, I feel that they would use Games for Windows Live: Microsoft's competing service. This game isn't even offered on Microsoft's service. --Louis C. (talk) 03:15, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft Game Studios? 

message: A lot of users have been adding codes to this section. Wikipedia is, first of all, not a guide, and second of all, not a place to promote yourself. Apparently, getting people to use these codes grants the people who added them items ingame, so, it's basically players trying to spam the article. Remove any revisions that look like this. Eik Corell (talk) 11:56, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subscription information section 

message: Would it be a good idea to rewrite all statements from present to past tense? Meaning is → was. Sincerely, •ː• 3ICE •ː• 14:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead game, when was it shut down?
Talk:Hibbertia scandens

message: While it is correct that the preceding citation does not specifically describe the odor as resembling that of naphtha, I have personally observed that characteristic.  I have tried to find a suitable reference to that effect, but have not yet been successful.  Nevertheless, I have restored that comment.  Please do not delete the text, as I am trying to legitimately add to the knowledge base here.  I have no other agenda.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deceglie (talk • contribs) 14:26, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't detected this odour myself in cultivated plants in Melbourne, but there are many reports of it from various sources. Perhaps it varies  with plants, conditions, regions or people's perceptions. However, we need to stick with reliable sources and avoid original research. Melburnian (talk) 00:46, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Every citation provided for this claim has proved a dead link. I can find no current online source supoorting it. At some point it will have to be removed if no further sources can be found. Darorcilmir (talk) 22:43, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: The Matter of the Unpleasant Odour
Talk:A/k/a Tommy Chong

message: All the data in this section and everything under it except for the reference section is already covered in the gray sidebar.  It's unnecessary to incorporate this stuff into the article proper.
RecentlyAnon (talk) 01:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Production Credits etc.

message: I found an article about the raid where copies of this DVD were seized on the website of the local news station. I'd insert the reference myself, but i'm not very good at editing wikipedia, but i thought i could provide the link if someone wanted to include it or use it to expand the article.  Sir Isto (talk) 00:41, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your link has gone bad, but I found another one from Chong's bio page and used it to create a section. Ghostofnemo (talk) 03:20, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The archive of the Sir Isto's link is here.  It's not a great article, and gets the title of the movie wrong.  Oh well. --Lexein (talk) 03:23, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Raid

message: Second paragraph of synopsis is an incomplete sentence and doesn't make sense.  Don't know what it was meant to say and really don't care.  Just pointing this out for someone who does know and care.  —Nonenmac (talk) 15:32, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis

message: * a/k/a Tommy Chong Film Credits at Film.com -- Dead link - tried both archive.org and Webcitation, no luck.
--Lexein (talk) 03:16, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  EL dead, moved here 
Talk:2002–03 Middlesbrough F.C. season

message: Was there anything particularly notable about season 2002-03? I'm not sure it's worth going back and creating separate articles for every season. 2003-04 we won a cup so makes sense to have one on that, and the next two were in Europe. 2006-07 was written as it went along. I'm just not too sure it's a great idea to go too far back writing articles about every season. --Simmo676 11:12, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:V. K. Samaranayake

message: Article in the process of being created.  Wait till is done and then decide.
:'Please Sign your posts - Agreeed -- Rehnn83 Talk 11:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't intend to be disrespectful.  That being said, someone being the father of IT in Sri Lanka leaves me feeling entirely underwhelmed.--User:RandomHumanoid(talk) 03:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm satisfied about his notability; looks like the article has been cleaned up considerably since you tagged it. -David Schaich Talk/Cont 19:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability?
Talk:Alphanumericals

message: "There are either 36 (single case) or 62 (case-sensitive) alphanumeric characters." 
Shouldn't it be 72? --80.129.12.123 11:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 22:49, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

text: No it shouldn't 36 is a number of letters plus digits. When you add up another 26 of Upper Case for letters you are getting 62. Digits are not case sensitive.202.92.40.4 03:46, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Count

message: What about accented characters, ñ, ç, to avoid speaking of ideograms, arabic, etc.?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.69.29.49 (talk) 18:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  L10n and I18n? 

message: "Alphanumeric data can be stored even more compactly in computer systems if the storage medium is calculated in base 36, where each numerical position represents a character. Storing characters in base 36 and base 64 (6 bits per character) is more memory efficient for storing text-only data than base 2 ASCII (using 8 or 7 bits for each character)."
This makes no sense.  True, characters CAN be stored in 6 bits (only 62 characters possible, and 64 values available in 6 bits).  And true, this is more memory efficient than storing in ASCII (7 or 8 bits per character).
However, that has NOTHING to do with anything "base 36" or "base 64".  Bits are by their very nature base 2.  If it is stored in bits, it is a base 2 representation of something.  "6 bits" are base 2.  ASCII is stored in base 2.  A sequence of bits can represent a base 36 value or a base 10 value or an ASCII value, but it is still stored in base 2.  Whomever wrote this entry seems to have no idea what these terms actually mean.  I'm a little surprised that this has stayed on the page for so long.
This paragraph is factually wrong and contributes nothing that isn't explained better in the paragraph that precedes it.  Removed.
(Additionally, I'm re-adding the content lost in the February vandalism.  Please UNDO vandalism, don't just delete it) 146.187.130.125 (talk) 01:40, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Base 36? Base 64? 

message: Somebody suggested that alphanumeric code be merged with this article. That sounds like a good idea to me; it could go under "Computing" in a subsection.     — SkyLined (talk) 23:24, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge alphanumeric code
Talk:List of American films of 1964

message: - [ See 1950 format: Talk:List of American films of 1950. -Wikid77 (talk) 04:34, 7 October 2008]
The Night of the Iguana - Cast: Richard Burton; Ava Gardner; Deborah Kerr  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.114.189.106 (talk) 10:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Format
Talk:SS Cawarra

message: This article has been automatically assessed for WP:SHIPS as stub-class because there is a stub template on the article page. HausTalk 22:47, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Upgraded to Start class Mjroots (talk) 23:06, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Włodzimierz Kołos

message: It has been suggested that the page for the page for the Kołos Medal should be merged with with that for Włodzimierz Kołos. I don't think that's a good idea. It would be like merging the pages for the Nobel Prize and for Alfred Nobel. Naming a prize after someone honours them, but the prize develops a life of its own. It is better to keep separate pages that lik to each other. Dch0jmh 11:53, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose  — The article about the Kołos Medal lists the winners of the award. New names will continue to be added. On the other hand, the article about Włodzimierz Kołos lists the awards and medals that he had received. It would be confusing to put new names in Kołos biography if the Kołos Medal recipients were listed within Kołos article. — CZmarlin (talk) 05:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jean Saint Malo

message: I think that an 18th century slave brave enough to lead other slaves in an organised runaway, who paid for it with his life, and who has a still existant town named for him already for two centuries, amply deserves to have a Wikipedia page. It is of obvious interest to people interested in the history of slavery and in early American history, also in the history of Spanish colonilaism (since it was a Spanish colony then). I am a little bit surprised that there is even a need to argue about whether or not it is of interest. I have taken the information avaiable in the Saint Malo, Louisiana page and made of it a stub, it contians the basic facts of his life and death and I think this is quite enough to make a resepctable stub (I saw quite a few stubs in Wikipedia with far less information, which were NOT deleted). When I have time I intend to search for more information about him and extend the page. Andreas Kaganov 11:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why this page should not be deleted
Talk:Watertable control

message: The classification needs substantiation to be able to help improving it and otain a higher importance score. R.J.Oosterbaan (talk) 18:26, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Month later. Substantiation absent. The template should look like hereunder. R.J.Oosterbaan (talk) 14:29, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification

message: I had a warning when I linked something to land drainage, which turns out to be a dab-page.  What I was looking for related to the drainage of the fens and other marshes in Britain.  I feel sure there must be an article on this, but so far the nearest that I can find is this one, but it is concenred with something on a much smaller scale than I meant.  Any suggestions?  Or is this article missing something? Peterkingiron (talk) 21:40, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Fen drainage
Talk:Groundwater model

message: This article was made on 11:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: I'm sure there are some nice visual representations from one computer model or another that could be included. -- Beland (talk) 17:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Two figures were added to accommodate Beland´s request, but perhaps nicer visual representations could be included. R.J.Oosterbaan (talk) 18:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustration request
Talk:Gretsch 6128

message: I think this article needs a photograpy to ilustrare the text  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.245.39 (talk) 19:35, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gretsch image 

message: Shouldn't this be named Gretsch Duo-Jet per WP:COMMONNAME? The model number is not nearly as commonly used. oknazevad (talk) 17:44, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 1948 was called The Fred 60 Broadway 6128 this would be a museum piece 173.184.146.254 (talk) 01:56, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retitle?
Talk:Well drainage

message: This article was first made on 11:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:The Bluebell Collision

message: Currently the Bluebell disambiguation page, and several other pages, imply the ferry named bluebell, involved in a collision in Australia in the 1930s, was formerly the ferry named Bluebell launched in Toronto in 1906, for the Toronto Ferry Company.
This is extremely unlikely, on its face, as the Toronto Bluebell had an extremely shallow draft, which would have made it a difficult tow.  
Further, this 1957 photo shows she continued to serve in Toronto, until she was turned into a scow.  Geo Swan (talk) 20:04, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  dubious assertions
Category talk:Birds of Southeast Asia

message: Is New Guinea (western part = Indonesia) included in this category ? --Stavenn 12:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: This category is poaching from South Asia project - (currently inactive) - suggest - to remove South Asia countries - unless someone can come up with a convincing argument that WP South Asia ecozone is inextricably linked with WP Southeast Asia as far as birds are concerned  SatuSuro 05:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem
Talk:Musunuri Kapaya Nayaka

message: Hi! Please add credible sources, either online or reference books, to support the facts added. Thank You. --AltruismTo talk 12:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: , You are turning this page into hagiography, which is all that the Andhra historians do. If Kapaya Nayaka was such a great "patriot", as these sources claim, and threw off the "foreign yoke" by leading confederation of 75 chieftains and all that, he wouldn't have been finished off by another fellow chieftain prematurely. You can't keep pushing these birdy-eyed adulations when other neutral sources exist that provide critical analysis. And, by the way, Malik Maqbul whom Kapaya Nayaka deposed was a perfectly local Warangal man, not a "foreigner". -- Kautilya3 (talk) 06:38, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have reverted the changes for now. Andhra historians have quite a reputation for this sort of thing. I'm afraid that this and related articles have frequently seen the Nayak pudding overegged by sockfarms, so the likes of myself and Kautilya3 have seen these sources time and again. - Sitush (talk) 06:50, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

text: For example, your use of Richard Eaton was fine but it was a minor point, whereas you used Durga Prasad more extensively (including linking to what appears to be a copyright-violating hosting of the book) and there have been concerns expressed in the past that Prasad simply isn't reliable. - Sitush (talk) 07:20, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avoid [[hagiography]]
Talk:Rowallan Castle

message: There is a dispute over content that keeps getting added and removed from the 'owners' section, regarding an $800 fine for threatening or abusive behavior. One issue is that the user doing most of the deletion is user:Campbellkate, who may have a conflict of interest (the name of the person with the $800 fine is Niall Campbell, their wife's first name is Catriona, according to their Wikipedia Page). I originally thought the deletions were vandalism, but it appears to be an issue of potential conflict of interest. Additionally, many of the edit summaries appear to be intentionally misleading (e.g., removing the sentences referring to the fine, but stating that they were just fixing a typo).
More immediately important however is the question of whether or not this information is actually relevant to this page? My opinion is that the information does not belong here, regardless of whether it is factual and properly cited, simply based on it's tangential-at-best relation to the castle. I would like to see the information regarding the fine moved to the Niall Campbell page directly, if it is relevant there, but removed from this page. Any thoughts? Thanks. Paisarepa (talk) 01:49, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Would page protection help? - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 19:37, 15 July 2019 (UTC)

text: OK, looking over this in more detail, I see/recall now I'm one of the people who warned  for removing sources. If that user does it again, they're getting blocked. But we now have IPs doing similar edits, so I think semi-protecting the page is probably best. I'll look at the logs and protect it for a period of time to give established users some time to sort this, source it, and fix the POV issues. - CorbieV ☊ ☼ 19:54, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owners
Talk:Cloud Gate Dance Theater

message: I would like to start a new article for Cloud Gate 2.  What do you think? M4xl1n888 (talk) 22:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Article for Cloud Gate 2 

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheKuygerian (talk • contribs) 00:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Domestic Tour