lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Neal Doughty

message: It's not gossip that Neil is credited for 1 of 10 songs on the new record.  It's also not gossip that this has led some fans, myself included, to wonder what's up.  And then moving away?  Interesting. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.208.189.150 (talk) 18:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jail for gossip? 

message: Neal has said online that he was not enthusiastic about making a new record or the long commute to the studio. And he moved to be near his girlfriend. This is all taken from his own remarks on a chat page. Let's wait and see if he is touring next year before starting to worry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.161.188.155 (talk) 21:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bruce also moved. 

message: Sure would like a way to drop Neal a note - I saw his interview on the SoundStage DVD which I bought recently.  Anyone have an e-mail address?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.20.9.66 (talk) 18:03, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contact Neal?
Talk:Maybe Baby (film)

message: IMHO, Maybe Baby should either point to the 1958 Crickets' song, from which the film takes its title, or a disambiguation page. Linuxlad (talk) 10:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Which comes first?

message: #I removed an ugly placeholder template from main article space diff.
#Ugly placeholder template was added back by , diff.
#I asked  for a way please for the first time the coding is added to a page in main article space, for it to be commented-out, and not display the ugly placeholder text to readers. That way, the first time the bot edits the page, it will show useful info, instead of having a placeholder sit there for over one week, or more.  has not responded yet to this idea. 
#Until such time as this placeholder text can be commented-out and still work for the bot, I don't think it should be in main article space, as it serves no purpose for our readers.
Thank you, 
— Cirt (talk) 21:20, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ugly placeholder template 

message: My above discussion section was immediately closed down by , which effectively modified my talk page comments without my permission diff. 
This is inappropriate.
My comments were unaddressed, still are unaddressed, and I have not been asked nor given permission for anyone to modify my comments.
Thank you,
— Cirt (talk) 21:31, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: *I won't revert your edit more than once. However I maintain it is inappropriate to unilaterally collapse someone else's comments on a talk page. You are the only other party to this argument. Therefore you are biased. Therefore you should not collapse my comments. It is blatantly biased and inappropriate. But I won't uncollapse my comments again. — Cirt (talk) 21:38, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: *Obviously it seems most unfortunately that the above user will collapse talk page discussions himself if he finds their contents disagreeable to him. So I will chose to disengage from this article page and its discussion page. I emphasize again it is inappropriate to collapse discussion sections of other users, especially those one is in disagreement with at the exact moment of the disagreement! Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 22:21, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatted discussion without permission
Talk:Gonagas

message: I added it, just a fun thing to know if youre interested about norsemen :). --DerMeister 16:13, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kuningaz 

message: This article is tiny, receives 3 visitors daily, and has not been edited since 2013. I suggest that it be merged into Noaidi - Sami shaman. William Harris • (talk) • 22:44, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noaidi merge
Talk:Edmund Blacket

message: just tying the names with an ad showing Windsor district, Blackett and Mort Dave Rave (talk) 20:34, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  More works
Talk:Perivale tube station

message: I can't make any sense of this:
The station also featured in the BBC TV show The Fast Show during a "Fat Sweaty Coppers" sketch, during which the two policemen give chase to a criminal, and after briefly getting stuck in the barriers, "commandeer" a vehicle which turns out to be a fast food van, which they simply open up to order food.
Shouldn't it be:
:The station also featured in the BBC TV show The Fast Show during a "Fat Sweaty Coppers" sketch, during which the two policemen give chase to a criminal, and after briefly getting stuck in the     barriers. "commandeer" 'is a vehicle which turns out to be a fast food van, which they simply open up to order food.
Wetter88 (talk) 10:46, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Commandeer is a verb (see wikt:commandeer) so you can read it as 'two policemen ... forcefully take a vehicle". --Redrose64 (talk) 15:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''TV appearances'' section
Talk:The Sword and the Sorcerer

message: The text in the first paragraph of the article and the text in the Reception section are not consistent with each other and need editing and referencing 72.89.117.28 (talk) 01:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: (tsk tsk, actually Xusia jumped off the cliff to escape his for sure death)
wtf is that commentary doing in there? Cowicide (talk) 11:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  delete this? 

message: Seeing how he was a teenage prince when he had to flee for his live, he didn't have to "discover" is royal heritage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.35.35.35 (talk) 17:25, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate
Talk:Capturing race

message: The example says it's a "5 Dan" difficulty level. Given the fact that someone with that level of skill is unlikely to ever care to visit a Wikipedia page to get more info on it, wouldn't it be a good idea to replace it with something that would be easier for a lower ranking player (or a total starter, in this case) to understand? --lucid 16:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example 

message: The link for chosei goes to article about city by that name.
198.144.192.45 (talk) 17:02, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chosei link bad
Talk:4-Androstene-3,6,17-trione

message: Isn't this banned in the U.S. just like Androstenedione. Quadzilla99 17:17, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ,No because it is an aromatase inhibitor and not a prohormone. --Bk0 (Talk) 22:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Banned

message: There's some new research on 6-OXO, check it out: http://www.jissn.com/content/4/1/13
I'm not sure if anyone's actively watching this article, but I thought I'd see if someone responds, otherwise I'll go about and rewrite the article. Jack Daw 14:00, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting research. Please feel free to add it into the article text. --Bk0 (Talk) 22:17, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New research 
Talk:Dong Fang Hong 2

message: hi, everyone, 
I suggest to change the title of this article to "Dong Fang Hong 2" instead of "Dong Fang Hong 02", because as a satellite family, there are also "Dong Fang Hong 3" (communication satellite family) and "Dong Fang Hong 4". 
Plus, in Chinese, not one use "Dong Fang Hong 02". Please kindly consider thange it. 
I am trying to update the "Dong Fang Hong (disambiguation)" page as well to reflect that.
Thanks,
Clark  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarkchen900 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I noticed that the articles for these first two satellites are "Dong Fang Hong I" (that is, Roman numbering) and "Dong Fang Hong 2" (Arabic numbering). Would it be possible to change one of them so that they're both Roman or Arabic? Ron Stoppable (talk) 06:20, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Omallystwin

message: I completely concur with Jayron32's view, except for the suggest to attempt to integrate the JKR information.  I've certainly given Omallystwin the benefit of the doubt: I first moved his the JKR stuff to an "In popular culture" section, then let him slide (by not reporting a 3RR), then offered my reluctant view that there 'may' be a possibility that it's notable enough, but then finally decided that there was sufficient consensus to keep the JKR information off the page.
BigFatDave's edit, which he admitted lacked notability, attempted to integrate the information into the "In popular culture" section, but that was reverted as well (and appropriately so, IMHO).
He's obviously frustrated (see his "stuff the consensus, ill keep reposting it" comment), because he sees JKR and FredTheMonkey as notable, but the consensus is against it.  
I'm continuing to assume good faith, and am looking for a reasonable way to resolve this. Travisl 16:25, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was never a fan of "in popular culture" sections in the first place. I really don't think they're encyclopedic, and they raise the question "what is popular?" The payoff isn't worth it. A lot of the time (as in this case), they're used for fans of a less popular entity to leech onto the article of a more popular entity. – flamurai (t) 17:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  In assuming good faith, I also assumed that Omallystwin's first post-RFC edit was made because, perhaps, he wasn't aware of the RFC.  That assumption is being tested, however, with yet another edit today. I've left a note on his talk page reminding to leave his response here. Travisl 01:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  He hasn't made any edits in about two months. I think this is now a moot point.  What needs to be done next to wrapt this up? Travisl 00:00, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Theophilus ben Ananus

message: "Archeological evidence confirms the existence of Theophilus the High Priest as an ossuary has been discovered bearing the inscription, Johanna granddaughter of Theophilus, the High Priest. The details of this ossuary have been published in the Israel Exploration Journal. Therefore Theophilus had at least one other son named Jonathan, father to Johanna."
I do not follow the reasoning of this statement in the article.  How do you figure Theophilus had another son named Jonathan who was the father of Johanna from an inscription that reads: Johanna granddaughter of Theophilus the High Priest? Eupolis 16:26, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theophilus's son Jonathan 

message: Is "Theophilus" really his name, or is it a translation into Greek of a Hebrew name that means "God-lover" or the like? --Jfruh (talk) 01:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek name?
Talk:Workgroup Support Systems

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! This article can most likely be merged with Groupware. JubalHarshaw 16:28, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

message: The example looks like advertisement. I think it should be removed. Van der Hoorn (talk) 23:29, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example
Talk:Pacific-class patrol boat

message: *http://www.defence.gov.au/adc/docs/Publications2013/Linda%20McCann%20-%20Shedden%20Paper%20(final).pdf - Defence, Shedden Papers
*http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/defence-calls-to-scrap-pacific-patrol-vessels/2008/09/29/1222650989577.html - Sydney Morning Herald  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.10.51.1 (talk) 03:13, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential sources

message: Only dates in yyyy-mm-dd format sort properly.  There is no point having a sortable table, with columns devoted to dates, if those dates are written in a form that doesn't sort properly.  So I restored yyyy-mm-dd format.
Please don't change it back, without first explaining why the table should not be sortable.  Geo Swan (talk) 02:24, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: table dates
Talk:Bio of a Space Tyrant

message: It's been some years since I've read the series(and I don't have ready access to the books right now), but I could swear Book 5 was originally titled Exile, rather than Statesman. ~~Will~~  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.91.234.16 (talk) 16:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasn't Statesman Originially Titled Exile? 

message: Neither 944 Hidalgo nor 2060 Chiron is in the asteroid belt ... —Tamfang (talk) 03:12, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  places in their proper places in space
Talk:Police bicycle

message: This section would be much more interesting if it talked about the special characteristics that police bikes have.  At the moment it mainly says they have lights, which is a legal requirement in most countries, and a rack, which most non-police bikes do. Rich257 12:45, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bicycle characteristics 

message: The recently-added information on noseless saddles seems a bit excessive to me.  I'd like to pare it down to one or two sentences, with a wikilink to another article that covers the matter in more detail.  Police bikes were chosen as very good candidates for the study on noseless saddles because officers spend so much time in the saddle.  However, the results of the study address the larger cycling community, not just bike cops.  Thoughts?  Ebikeguy (talk) 17:34, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't that really belong in the bicycle article or one on bike saddles?  Just because it included police use does not mean that it is needed here.  Vegaswikian (talk) 17:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a very brief mention of it may be warranted in this article, but the main language should be in the Bicycle saddle article.  Ebikeguy (talk) 18:14, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Much Info on Noseless Saddles?
Talk:Police watercraft

message: I took out this section. It was just a random list of mostly police departments, with some other random agencies thrown in, and it didn't link to articles about police watercraft - just the departments themselves. It served no useful purpose and was unsourced anyway (except for one source about the Chicago PD). If there were several articles that were specifically about the police watercraft of particular agencies (such as, New York City Police Department watercraft or something like that), then I could see such a section being useful. JimKaatFan (talk) 17:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Agencies with Police boats"
Talk:Knowledge environment

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 16:38, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Conspiracy theories

message: This category should only be for conspiracy theories, not conspiracy people (actors, authors/writers, filmmakers, etc), documentaries, TV shows, films/movies, etc. Subcategories for those other things can be created which, including this category, can all be then categorized under a :category:conspiracy. -Eep² 23:28, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Altissimo

message: At least half of this article reads just like a guidebook, which is exactly what Wikipedia is not. Should these parts simply be removed or is somebody planning to rewrite this? — Mütze 16:44, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:NOT

message: I am almost completely certain that Lenny Pickett uses his teeth (i.e. bites) on the reed to get the highest altissimo notes  This should be noted in the article.  Badagnani 04:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teeth 

message: On woodwinds, altissimo seems to mean the third or higher attainable harmonic (5th and higher on clarinet due to lack of even harmonics).  But what is the marking point for brass instruments, and is it different for trumpets/trombones/tubas than it is for horns?
I would imagine that the 9th and higher harmonics would be considered altissimo on brass other than the horn, while the horn altissimo could be defined as starting either at the 13th or 17th depending on your reckoning.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Comrade Sephiroth (talk • contribs) 09:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of brass altissimo? 

message: Since there is no Altissimo section in the Saxophone article, I am removing the link to that supposed section.
John Link (talk) 09:18, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Altissimo section in Saxophone article
Talk:SWAT vehicle

message: Is Nashville the only city in the world to have SWAT teams? Then why is their link here? Replacing the link to the SWAT article.-Uagehry456talk 08:56, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

message: The entire 'Popular Culture' part seems to be a copy paste from a specs website. Especially with this "available to qualified end users Small, Medium and Large Wheel Base versions available for 10 to 16 passengers, and custom applications and versions can be designed for specific needs and missions Additional options available by request" can we fix this?  Knippschild 15:52, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy / Paste?
Talk:Dallas Winston

message: Dally is the dangerous member of the group who only cares about a few things (johhny being one of them). He is cold and hard but only from prison (according to the book). He cannot handle johnny's death because johnny was one of his only friends.
72.193.40.246 22:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In analogy to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ponyboy Curtis and given the already merged content, I've now redirected this character once emore. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:15, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

message: An editor has un-redirected and started a new article. Since The Outsiders also falls under TV (and a current ArbCom injunction), I only edited it just to get it off the cleanup lists. I suggest restoring the redirect. • Gene93k (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feb. 2008 un-redirect
Talk:Watchman camera

message: Judging by http://www.watchmanltd.co.uk/Watchman_Handbook-2.pdf this scheme is those black signs which flash the speed limit at you (not your actual speed) if you're going too fast. The current article implies that drivers opt in to the scheme, which I'm pretty sure is incorrect. I'll edit accordingly. Fish-Face 00:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ARWEN 37

message: Maybe ARWEN ACE should be merged with this page?
Enquire (talk) 17:50, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with ARWEN ACE
Talk:ARWEN ACE

message: Maybe ARWEN 37 should be merged with this page?
Enquire (talk) 17:52, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with ARWEN 37 

message: It's made clear in the article that ARWEN is an initialism, but if "ace" is not then it should not be written in all caps.  There instead should be a note that it's styled that way by the manufacturer. ~TPW 14:28, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ace
Talk:Black Swan Green

message: In changing it I noticed the creator of the article included the note  and whilst I appreciate he did so, and have left all other references by him towards this speech disorder as stammering, I have opted to change the first instance of stammering to stuttering, as the article reads with more fluidity--avoiding an anachronistic term--and links to the article 'suttering' directly instead of the 'stammering' page which is just a redirect to stuttering. BaSH PR0MPT (talk) 02:07, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed stammering to stuttering. 
Talk:Association rule learning

message: This page really needs good, simple definitions of frequent set, support, confidence, and lift.  Right now it's all jargon.  dfrankow 16:58, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The Association rule mining page seems very similar to this page.  I think it should be merged.  In fact, I'm going to do it now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnnnnn (talk • contribs) 10:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The merge was performed, this issue is resolved. WilliamKF (talk) 17:07, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: One-attribute-rule is an orphan and is very stubby. I propose that it should be merged to here.NHSavage (talk) 07:19, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: merger complete. Also added section on apriori algorithm.--NHSavage (talk) 08:53, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge One-attribute-rule to here 

message: Incomplete info on how to implement the method in practice, or which software can do it. Added link to statistica, but perhaps other software like SPSS can do this too? Mango bush (talk) 07:09, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implementations 

message: I made an small gramatical fix here to the article, but it could have been fixed in another sense, so could an expect please review this and ensure we have the correct meaning now? 
Current:
:Looking for techniques that can model what the user has known (and using these models as interestingness measures) is currently an active research trend under the name of "Subjective Interestingness."
Alternate:
:Looking for techniques that can model what the user has known (and using this model as an interestingness measure) is currently an active research trend under the name of "Subjective Interestingness."
Thanks for checking. WilliamKF (talk) 17:05, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review grammar edit 

message: I was reading this through and with a rapid glance it seems that the definition of lift may have an error. Shouldn't the lift have an intersection instead of the union of the events in the numerator. Or is it just another definition of lift? Anyone who has time and expertise, please review that formula and modify it if needed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.238.110.230 (talk) 19:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error
Talk:Mar-a-Lago

message: Under the section The Mar-a-Lago Club, in the last paragraph, the incorrect newspaper name is used in the text. It should be Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. This can be confirmed if you look at the foot notes for this paragraph. The name given is not a valid Pittsburgh newspaper.  Si Guy 57 (talk) 14:51, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . Thanks for finding that error. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 18:19, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect newspaper name 

message: The section on the origin of the name states that "Mar-a-Lago means "sea-to-lake" in Spanish, referring to the fact that the resort extends the entire width of Palm Beach, from the Atlantic Ocean to Lake Worth Lagoon", but then the section on Trump's acquiring the property states that he reduced the price by "purchas[ing] the land between Mar-a-Lago and the ocean from Jack C. Massey, the former owner of KFC, for $2 million, stating he intended to build a home that would block Mar-a-Lago's beach view." This seems contradictory? 2A02:C7C:364D:A400:130:F18C:6B93:9686 (talk) 2A02:C7C:364D:A400:130:F18C:6B93:9686 (talk) 21:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction?
Talk:Oskar Vogt

message: Why not just get rid of this article altogether. What's the process for getting a page deleted? This one seems like a worthwhile candidate, the individual is not notable and there is so little information in the public domain about him. Bubuntu 21:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I definitely disagree! He was a very notable scientist at his time and he did a lot for neuroscience! I'm working on the article now.static shakedown 18:31, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: superfluous

message: This page needs to be cleaned up and almost entirely rewritten.  It also needs to split into two separate articles, one for Cecile Vogt-Mugnier (that page redirects here) and one for Oskar Vogt (currently that page redirects here also).  Named as it is, it violates dozens of Wikipedia naming conventions.  It also shouldn't use top-level sections, i.e. =Big Title=.  Top-level sections should never be used (the fact that the Wiki software allows it is another issue).  The top-most sections should always be second order, e.g. ==Smaller title==.  I'll try to address some of these issues myself, but since I'm not an expert on the subject matter, it may take a while. — Frecklefoot | Talk 17:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I took a stab at it, but since I am so unfamiliar with the subject, it still looks (and reads) very poorly.  It needs someone with a good understanding of the subject matter to whack it into shape. — Frecklefoot | Talk 17:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleaned up and referenced. FeatherPluma (talk) 14:47, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup