Talk:Persian carpet

message: "Rug" sounds very odd in this context. Doesn't everyone use "carpet"? Isn't a "rug" like a schmata for the floor?  Something you roll up and truck about, like a prayer rug. Perhaps "carpet" in middle-class American usage now only denotes a fitted broadloom. --Wetman 21:34, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rug or carpet? 

message: I'm not particularly interested in helping, but someone should try to put accurate links on that list where it's 98% red (nonfuntional) links.
How Wikipedian of you. Of course the reason the links for the classifications of Persian carpets don't work is because no one has written articles on them yet.  They are at this point only  "potential information." But I'm sure you knew that - you just decided to state the obvious, and make no effort to be part of the solution despite your handle. Thanks!! Astragal 16:31, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: All the nonfuntioning links

message: There are two categories relating to rugs: 
1. :Category:Rugs which is a sub-category of :Category:Textile arts which is a sub category of  the Categories: Artistic techniques | Art media | Textiles | Crafts | Arts and crafts
and 
2. :Category:Rugs and carpets which is a sub-category of :Category:Textiles
I propose to merge Category:Rugs into Category:Rugs and carpets.  Please see discussion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion#Category:Rugs_to_Category:Rugs_and_carpets  --A  Y  Arktos 21:37, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of categories 

message: Hi everyone,
I have a web site about Handmade Persian Rugs and there I have two documentary movies which were produced by us (Sobhe Trading Co.) I thought it might be an interesting thing to be added to the Persian Rug page of wikipedia.org. The movies can be find at www.rugidea.com/movies
I tried adding it to this page acouple of times but each time, for some reason, it was found as an advertisement for my web site. Please let me know if there is a proper way of adding an external link to wikipedia.org. You may also contact me if you have any questions.
ashkan@drsobhe.com
Many thanks,
Ashkan
:Wikipedia doesn't generally support external links to commercial websites - see Wikipedia:External links and Wikipedia:spam for more advice. -- Solipsist 12:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My link 

message: Should Damascus Rug from Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Hot/D/Dab-Dar redirect here?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus  talk  19:03, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Damascus Rug]]

message: In the history section there is a sentence-
:A number of rugs believed to have been woven by the famous Daddeh family were recently discovered and then auctioned in Agra, India, fetching some of the highest prices ever observed in the rug market.
I moved it from the end of the paragraph that talks about the age of the rug making art since their was no obvious connection.  It's still not clear to me why this is here.  I presume these are important rugs.  It would be great to have a bit more information in the article on why they're important and what the significance of the find is. --Siobhan Hansa 13:40, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This paragraph was added recently - it seems likely to be true, but it would help to have a reference and some more background. (Still better than many of the edits we get here). -- Solipsist 14:36, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daddeh family rugs 

message: Would like to propose external link to article about Persian rugs. It is located at the following url: http://www.oldandsold.com/articles02/article1030.shtml Smithville 00:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just responded to a similar post from you on another article I'm interested in - and the response is the same.  These articles are really not very good.  This one in particular seems like a POV, essay on how to buy a rug.  In fairly poor English (which isn't the worst thing in the world, but it doesn't help).  The adding of the link doesn't seem to serve our readers well.  --Siobhan Hansa 04:37, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propsosal for external link 

message: It seems to me that the whole category of tribal rugs is missing from this section. I'm just learning about Persian rugs, but have found the distinctions made at oldcarpet.com useful. Is there any reason not to arrange this section along similar lines? --Philbarker 18:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of carpets 

message: ===Persian Carpets (not Rug)===
Persian carpets is the correct term which has been in use for centuries. Encyclopaedia Iranica also recognises the "Persian Carpet" as the scholarly and correct term than "Rug". Persian rug is a subdivision of Persian Carpets. 
Google search provides:
:354,000 entries for Persian Rug (which mainly are commercial websites)
:428,000 entries for Persian Carpet (almost half scholarly and research websites)
:190.000 entries for Persian Carpets (most of them scholarly and research websites) 
I believe People promote to keep "Persian Rug page" have commercial interests, rather educational. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk)  05:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: PS. The previous article "Persian rug", was POVs, and poorly written with no academic citations to support the entries. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk)  11:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree that this page should not be permanently deleted. I tagged it for history-merge, not permanent deletion (its location can be determined by WP:BRD or by talk-page consensus among people who know about the subject (I don't know much). See your talk page for more information. --ais523 12:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of the Persian Carpet is Contested

message: Persian carpets is the correct term which has been in use for centuries. Encyclopaedia Iranica also recognises the "Persian Carpet" as the scholarly and correct term than "Rug". Persian rug is a subdivision of Persian Carpets. 
Google search provides:
:354,000 entries for Persian Rug (which mainly are commercial websites)
:428,000 entries for Persian Carpet (almost half scholarly and research websites)
:190.000 entries for Persian Carpets (most of them scholarly and research websites) 
I believe People promote to keep "Persian Rug page" have commercial interests, rather educational. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk)  05:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: PS. The previous article "Persian rug", was POVs, and poorly written with no academic citations to support the entries. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk)  11:50, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree that this page should not be permanently deleted. I tagged it for history-merge, not permanent deletion (its location can be determined by WP:BRD or by talk-page consensus among people who know about the subject (I don't know much). See your talk page for more information. --ais523 12:02, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Persian Carpets (not Rug)

message: Dear Contributors: Please refrain yourself from adding commercial links to the article. Many of the commercial sites are not literate or educated enough to provide accurate info, which subsequently would undermines the integrity of this article. In addition, it is against Wikipedia policy WP:LINKS. ← ← Parthian Shot (Talk)  06:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External Link (Spam)

message: This may be of help to your article. You may use it if you find it useful:
Rugs are flat (pileless), un-knotted hand-woven textiles used as floor and wall coverings, bags and tent trappings. 
Unlike carpets, rugs are woven on a loom using vertical warps and horizontal wefts to weave the threads together much as any handmade fabric is woven. Usually the warp (the length of kilim) is made of wool and the weft (the width of kilim) of wool or cotton. The couloured threads are completely woven into the kilim like a basket, making it reversible. Although the face may be distinguished from the reverse, the difference is so slight that either side may be used.
“Kilim”, simply is a flat woven carpet or a kind of rug without any pile or knotted fluff: a coarse, thin hand made carpet. The terms used to describe flatweaves are indeed as varied as the trival weaving groups themselves. Some of the names used to describe flatwoven rugs are “hanbel” in North Africa,  in Turkey and Afghanistan it is called “Kilim”, in Ukraine “Palas”, in Caucasia “Liat”, In Syria and Lebanon it is called “Chilim” and in Iran “Gelim”. Today the term ‘KILIM’ has become the known term for a flatwoven rug of any origin, raw materilakm method of construction and pattering. 1
sourde: 1) Kilim – the Compete guide” by Alastair Hull and Jose Luczyk Wyhoweska, page 22
1993 Thaames & Hudson Ltd., London, reprinted 2005
In the past, kilim weaving had an important role in women’s life and it was the major part of their dowry and also a source of income. So brides had to learn this craft; of course, it must be considered, that weaving has only been allocated to woven and yet it is one of their routine tasks of tribe women.
Kilims have greatly changed during centuries, i.e., more marriages among different tribes, make different styles mixed together. By the end of 19th century, kilim weaving was damaged by undesired chemical dyes imported form European Countries.
It is obvious, that the reasons of kilim weaving have been vastly changed, in recent years; cultural motives and personal usage of weaving gave its place to benefits of trading. A glance at various kilims of different regions, either old or new, shows that the original kilims have their own special place, as before. --Krisbi2210 (talk) 10:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flat-woven carpets 

message: Here are some useful links for profound information:
http://witcombe.sbc.edu/ARTHislamic.html#Islamic
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Carpets with explanation of difference between carpets and rugs
and for fragments:
http://www.clemusart.com/explore/department.asp?deptgroup=3&display=list&recNo=125
for history:
http://www.lacma.org/islamic_art/emp.htm = Islamic Art at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art
best regards from Germany
--Krisbi2210 (talk) 08:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islamic period 

message: This chapter was copied word by word from without a reference to this page. Because I am a new member I don't know how you cope with this matter.
--Krisbi2210 (talk) 12:26, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traditional Centers of carpet production in Iran 

message: The statement, "Persian carpets are the finest in the world," must be a subjective statement as presented here, as it does not present evaluative or comparative evidence. It should be changed to demonstrate how an why Persian rugs are the finest in the world, or removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.13.47.4 (talk) 16:59, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finest In the World? 

message: Most of the carpets are not woven, they are knotted. Carpet maker(s) would be a more appropriate term.
One famous Persian carpet is not listed here. The Bijar carpet is known as the "Iron Carpet", because it is made from unusually tough wool. It can stand a lot of heavy traffic and will outlast any owner. I have numerous Persian carpets, my Bijar is right inside the front door. The Bijar is made with 2 wefts, and the pile is very dense so it stands at 90 degrees and does not flatten with usage. Classically, the 2 wefts are of different sizes, the first is very thick with a high twist and applied wet. The second is thinner. Some old Bijar carpets have 3 wefts. Bijar is in the Kurdish region of Persia (Iran), and they speak an unusual Kurdish dialect.Historygypsy (talk) 16:18, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Weavers?

message: Isn't there usually an intentional mistake to show it's not perfect (since only Allah is meant to be perfect)? Malick78 (talk) 23:30, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The That is certainly the case in the more "grander" designs. Hence the saying "the Persian carpet is perfectly imperfect, precisely imprecise." That, and the term for God in Farsi is "Khoda," as opposed to "Allah," which is the Arabic. The Scythian 23:13, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Intentional mistake?

message: Section: Zoroastrian period; penultimate paragraph. Although The Romanised version of the capital city's name "Ctesiphon" has been once mentioned in this section, the final sentence in the paragraph also refers to it as "Tuspawn". Instead of altering it to "Ctesiphon" or "Tisfoon", the common Persian pronunciation, I'm respecting the original for now and am querying the source for this pronunciation, "Tuspawn".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SBader (talk • contribs) 22:35, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sassanian Capital 

message: Persian carpets are not just more expensive than machine woven carpets because they are "an artistic presentation" but because it requires MORE TIME to produce them by hand than by machine. This holds true for any commodity in the world, value or price of a commodity has very little to do with colours, patterns, and styles because machines can do all of these things in less time and using less resources (i.e. machines dont need food, water, and shelter, nor do they call in sick for work). It is perfectly possible to produce high quality carpets using machinery that also have artistic styles, designs and patterns if not better than the ones weavers produce. 
The introduction states that "1.2 million weavers" are found in Iran but in another section it states that "nearly five million workers are engaged in the Iranian carpet industry." This needs further clarification, by "industry" who are you referring to? Industrialists? Company owners? Transporters? Retailers? Workers? All of them?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.68.252 (talk) 07:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Period 

message: The article states "However, it is believed that the carpet from Pazyryk is not likely a nomadic product, but a product of the Achaemenid period.[17]", with the reference "Lerner J., Some Achaemenid Objects from Pazyryk,Source, vol. X, no. 4:8-15 (1991), p. 12.". Unfortunately, the real title of the reference is actually "Some So-called Achaemenid Objects from Pazyryk". Willful misrepresentation or sloppy copy-paste might be to blame. The origins of the Pazyryk carpet are less certain than the statement, based on references including the cited one, although some Achaemenid influence is generally agreed upon. Article will be amended to reflect this. Enozkan (talk) 01:27, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of the Pazyryk carpet: Achaemenid or nomadic? 

message: The article contains a lot of valuable information (including modern carpet production), but I believe it could be re-arranged, more detailed information might be added, and, overall, the article might benefit from better references. I've added a "see also" to Oriental rugs for comparison. Any opinions?HajjiBaba (talk) 09:57, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: go to it! Johnbod (talk) 14:05, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2015 - Have another go at editing? 

message: This section contains essentially incorrect information. The asymmetrical "Persian" knot is not woven around one single warp, but around one warp, and halfway around the adjacent (see images in "knots"). Spanish, and some koptic rugs, use single-warp knots. The error probably comes from confusing the technique of knotting with the technique of "depressed warps" (see image in "knots"). When depressed warps are used in a carpet, only one half of the knot is visible from the backside of a rug. The entire knot still goes around two wefts, though.
Turkish carpets (esp. village and nomadic ones) are often more coarsely woven than Persian carpets. However, what is termed a "slightly more block like image" in the section discussed here (probably alluding to rectilinear design and stylization?) results from a different design tradition, and represents an active decision made by the weaver. As exemplified, e.g., by Persian Senneh or Tabriz carpets, very fine rugs can be woven with symmetric knots.
Hope this explains why I've deleted the section. It's certainly not meant to be "vandalism".  HajjiBaba (talk) 12:22, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section deleted: Anatolian and Persian carpets 

message: The section on "Designs, motifs, and patterns" contains only material from unverified sources ("research by the Iranian carpet company"). It appears that the section provides an unsystematic list of various design patterns. I am unclear about terms such as "intertwined fish patterns", "derivative patterns", "interconnected patterns", which, IMO, are useless to the average reader without any further explanation.
The most important, and distinguishing, patterns have been dealt with in a new section, using "rug book" terminology, substantiated by verified sources, and illustrated by images from WM Commons. If, by deleting this section, I have involuntarily deleted relevant information, I'd like to suggest that anyone who has more information about specific patterns may want to add this to the new section on "Design".HajjiBaba (talk) 09:58, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of section "Designs, motifs, and patterns" 

message: According to Speicherstadt:
: As of 2005, the companies in the Speicherstadt handled one-third of the world's carpet production, 
--Error (talk) 23:18, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speicherstadt 

message: "Materials" ([26]Edwards wrong)
""'Camel wool is occasionally used in Persian nomadic rugs. It is often dyed in black, or used in its natural colour. More often, wool said to be camel's wool turns out to be dyed sheep wool.[26]""" - - -
ACTUALLY: http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/baluchistan-v
"""Camel hair is sometimes woven into the niches (meḥrāb) of Baluch prayer carpets. These rugs are less somber, even occasionally light in ground color. The idea that this material is actually wool dyed with walnut husks (Edwards, p. l86) is incorrect; it is undyed camel hair.""
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:581:4300:4A74:3467:EBB9:DE06:F240 (talk) 01:23, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsigned comment 2018 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:41, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:25, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: It seems someone just copied the "qali-ye farsi" for the second entry "qali-ye irani", which I'm certain should have a different pronunciation written 2601:240:CD05:59DB:C0B7:3BE6:7E1B:B22C (talk) 22:50, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation in first paragraph 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:52, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion