lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:To Love (Faye Wong album)

message: Please join the diiscussion at Wikipedia talk:No original research/Archive 56#Translations into English of album and song titles. - Fayenatic (talk) 14:09, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Following that discussion, I removed unverifiable comments about the implications of song titles. If someone can find WP:RS then these can be restored, e.g. for MV meaning My Valentine as opposed to (e.g.) Music Video. - Fayenatic (talk) 15:39, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Translations into English of album and song titles

message: Is there some issue with the Rights from Sony?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.209.144.234 (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this album seemingly internationally unavailable for purchase
Talk:Immortalis (album)

message: ggggggrrrrrrrrrrrrraaaaaagggggggghhhhhhhhhhhh!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.234.109.177 (talk) 18:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ... Dan 15:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Londinium (album)

message: On my copy of the album, the name of fourth song "Headspace" is marked with an asterisk. A corresponding asterisk is at the end of track listing, followed by "Remix of Ubiquitous Wife". There is no evidence that let me doubt that this is a common footnote-reference/actual-footnote linking structure, as described under Asterisk#Typography’s first bullet point. In addition, the booklet contains lyrics, laid out spanning 7 pages. The lyrics of "Headspace" (also stated following an asterisk) are on second page – the very same page that’s got "* Remix of Ubiquitous Wife" at its bottom, but far away from the last page dealing with the last songs. There is also no counter-evidence that this is a footnote-reference/actual-footnote structure that links together the tokens "Headspace" and "Remix of Ubiquitous Wife".
Therefore I’ll edit this article accordingly. -- Pemu (talk) 18:59, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ubiquitous Wife Remix
Talk:The One-T ODC

message: removed patent nonsensical wording. article still lacks proper citations and expansion. ProfPolySci45 (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  changes 

message: I removed the reference to the berlin wall, doesnt make sense for an album released in 2003...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.204.65.212 (talk) 20:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Berlin Wall reference
Talk:Ptooff!

message: The quote "When the mode of the music changes, the walls of the city shake" is originally by Plato (from Plato's Republic), not Tuli Kupferberg.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.147.20.59 (talk) 18:11, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plato, not Tuli
Talk:Never Never Land (Pink Fairies album)

message: The text about Twink "working a deal" to gain exclusive songwriting copyright (and therefore royalties) is contentious and confusing. If the full band are the proper legal songwriters for all songs, why does the "Track listing" section include credits for Twink under his real name (John) Alder?
Phil Champ (talk) 15:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Bartine Burkett

message: Bartine said in her Tonight Show interview in November 1979 that she worked with Babe Hardy and that he was her "very best friend" and that "he looked after me".  Yet he is not in the list of "costars and friends" in this article. 74.98.11.80 (talk) 15:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Babe Hardy
Talk:Positive Touch

message: A reputable source? Is this a professional reviewer (ie someone who gets paid to write) or just a random punter with a website? Judging from the writing on the site, which is barely better than you get on Amazon's customer reviews, it looks like the latter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.126.81 (talk) 13:11, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: www.markprindle.com
Talk:Soft Targets

message: Does anyone know if Ricc Sheridan played drums in any part of the recording of this album? Sources indicate that original drummer Christopher Bear left the group either just before or just after the album was recorded. I can't figure out when exactly Ricc joined the band. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 19:15, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Drummer
Talk:The Shaming of the True

message: I've always interpreted the end of SOTT (train whistle, etc.) to signify that Johnny either dies or kills himself, which is eerily similar to Kevin's fate. Could be wrong, but that's what I sense Kevin is saying "at the END of a long day's night." Lending further support, SOTT's last song is called "Johnny's Last Song." Seems pretty final to me. I miss Kevin.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.31.192.100 (talk • contribs) 13:32, April 29, 2009 
:Funny (well, not) -- I was just listening to SoTT on the way to work this morning, and yes, the last ambience sounds to me like a shower, just running on.
:I'd like to think Johnny moves on, sadder but wiser, but that wouldn't seem to match the darkness of the rest of the album.  But this, of course, is all OR.  Unless there's some place we can cite, that explains what the ending was intended to be, there should be no interpretation in the article. (PS: the "~~~~" goes in the text, not in the summary...) --NapoliRoma (talk) 21:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: An Alternative Interpretation
Talk:¡Viva la Cobra!

message: Has the album leaked yet?
-S-Cum.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.99.27 (talk) 07:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I fixed the track listing as it was wrong and way out of order.
And please use headings in the discussion page in future.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebastien290194 (talk • contribs) 21:56, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Track listing

message: ok so why is this article on viva la cobra just... nothing?!! someone who is good at editing should probably make it worth something quickly. THIS ALBUM MATTERS TO THE UNIVERSE and deserves it. yeah. also, is there any confimation of the scandalous being the next single?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.229.77.245 (talk) 21:28, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: this whole thing!
Talk:Ordinary Level

message: There are people today who believe the General Certificate of Education was abolished, not thinking that it was only the lower half of the GCE that was abolished, thats because we don't refer to A levels as GCE A levels, but people at one time did call their O' Levels "GCEs". Some people would be my way of saying people in general, maybe a bad way to say it, but this is wikipedia and if there is a better way to mention this then be my guest, it's an open encyclopedia afterall. Though your correct, this is actually original research made by myself, which actually will not have any references at the moment, but I am hoping to find something.Amlder20 13:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's original research by yourself, then by definition it shouldn't be on Wikipedia at all per WP:OR. I understand what you're trying to say here, but you can't cite either yourself (unless you've been published) or "some people" as a source —  iridescent (talk to me!) 14:01, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been removed because  could not back it up. Amlder20 16:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

text: The things is that with the Advanced Level, an A is a pass and an E, the truth is that in the GCE article, no one really knows what the D and E really stood for and seems rather vague if anyone knows whether that is true or not. Anyway, I have included that in the article to prevent any future edit-wars. Amlder20 13:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion - Some people 

message: Some reference needs to be made in the introduction regarding when during a student's academic career this takes place. My assumption is that it's during secondary education, which is what is only implied in the section about the GCSE. Unimath (talk) 07:24, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  When? 

message: This article may be useful to people who already know what O-levels are.  There's a lot about the history of them and countries where they are used, however, the article doesn't explain what they are.  These tests are applicable to which age groups?  What subjects are covered?  How are the tests administered?  Can any analogies be drawn between these tests and those in the US?  
There is mention of grades but these do not seem to corelate to what we call grades in the US, which are the years a child attends school, i.e. kindergarten through 12th, so this causes confusion.  (Originally O-level passes were at Grades 1 through 6, with grades 7 through 9 being a fail)  It sounds like you mean that the O-levels are graded 1 through 9 with grades 1 through 6 being passing grades and 7 through 9 being failing grades.
This article could be made a lot more informative for people in foreign countries.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prettycow (talk • contribs) 19:16, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what are they really?
Talk:Jen Chapin

message: Restored after DRV: See here. Includes a lengthy list of media references. JJL 13:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, if you check her website, she's gotten great reviews from a bunch of notable newspaers, and NPR, just for starters. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 18:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: DRV
Talk:Peter Watchorn

message: There was a note about a previous version that had been deleted, apparently for being a straight copy of some web page. This is written from scratch. Tony 13:54, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some of Watchorn's harpsichord recordings use the so-called Bach-Lehman tuning (look at larips.com for more about this than you want to know).  I have listened to some of them and they have an interesting sound.  It might be worth mentioning the tuning in the article.  See  for specific recordings.  173.228.123.207 (talk) 23:46, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harpsichord tuning
Talk:Balloch, New Hampshire

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If you would like some advice on how to work this article, go on my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 01:36, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could somebody add a note about how this name is pronounced in New England. I am tipping on /'bɑ:lək/, but clarification would be good. (See the helpful division according to pronunciation at the disambig page Balloch.) --Doric Loon (talk) 11:46, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Control of the centre

message: Can anyone give a better explanation of why control of the centre is considered so important? In particular it's not clear why controlling (i.e. attacking) the centre squares is apparently more important than pieces being on the centre, given that it's pieces on the centre that have most mobility. (Or is controlling the centre a first stage in attempting to put pieces on the centre from where they can control more of the board?) Ben Finn 14:03, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pieces in the center are normally excellent if they can't be forced to move. If they can be forced away by the opponent then the advantage is only temporary. ChessCreator (talk) 16:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you control the center, you most likely have quick and easy access to all sides of the board, giving you a maneuverability that is coveted in a game of chess.  GrandMattster 15:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

message: This article should not be merged with chess, which is a comprehensive overview.  If it is to be merged, chess strategy would be better.  Bubba73 (talk), 01:20, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Although be aware of link from Chess_opening#Common_aims_in_opening_play. SunCreator (talk) 00:24, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

text: This subject is sufficiently important to give it its own page.  Don't merge.  GrandMattster 21:47, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, okay.  Sounds alright to me.  Nobody seems to actually want to do the work and merge them, though... GrandMattster 15:19, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I merged it.  Chess strategy still needs a lot of work, though.  Bubba73 (You talkin' to me?), 16:32, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, thanks for doing that.  I'm too lazy.  =) GrandMattster 20:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Computational problem

message: That has already been suggested on that article's talk page in 2004 with no objections. Pcap ping 15:43, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since we have separate pages on Decision problem, Search problem, Counting problem (complexity) and Optimization problem, might as well let this one be a separate page too? --Robin (talk) 15:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  By analogy it's probably reasonable, especially since I found source for the contents of function problem (albeit not for the exact title terminology). In any case, the notion should be mentioned here (not just as "see also"). I'm not convinced that either function problem or the other similarly stubby articles like counting problem (complexity) or promise problem should exist as separate articles, rater than redirects here, give that this page does/should overview them. Separate articles do give those pages way more google juice than redirects, but that's technically not a valid criteria at WP:STUB... If nobody else has an opinion on it (besides us and the 2004 comment) in a few days, feel free to remove the merge tag. Pcap ping 17:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[function problem]] here
Talk:Iron rod

message: The correct terminology used for Iron rod in construction engineering (and marketing) is not clear for me. Please help! Sohale 14:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I doubt iron rod is really made out of wrought iron as it is no longer commercially produced. If it used to be please note that and add sources. Also, can this be merged with another article because there isn't enough information here to warrant it's own article. Otherwise this needs to be expanded. --Wizard191 (talk) 14:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What's going on here

message: the iron rod also has a meaning in mormonism; do we knead to have some other links or a disambiguation?
* [Passage of an Iron Rod through the Head.]
* [Iron Rods in Mormonism]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Iron Rod (talk • contribs) 13:19, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You would need to start a new article as that topic does not pertain to the topic of this article. Note that the new article cannot be a list of external links per WP:NOTLINK. Wizard191 (talk) 14:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  other meaning of iron rod 

message: This page should be merged mainly into Tree of life vision, but also into Reinforced concrete--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 15:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging the content seems to be a good idea, as long as this page turns into a disambiguation page for this very different usage of the same two words. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 17:39, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, a disambiguation page would be good.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 18:29, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 13:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Angliss International Hotel School

message: I have reverted the page back to this . Currently, the website says this is the name of the school and has this logo. User:Mrschesh changed the name before. If someone has a reference saying that the name is the "Australian International Hotel School", I would appreciate it. Otherwise, the name should stay as is. Elisfkc (talk) 16:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Australian International Hotel School no longer has website. Their old domain (www.aihs.edu.au) was bought by the new and unrelated Angliss International Hotel School. This page needs to be renamed the Australian International Hotel School.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superchannel101 (talk • contribs) 01:18, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian International Hotel School no longer has website 

message: So there's some name confusion. Looking at the accreditation info there are two separate entities: http://www.teqsa.gov.au/national-register/provider/prv12099 and http://www.teqsa.gov.au/national-register/provider/prv12153  Ideally the article needs to be split in two, with a hat note disambiguating them, but I don't have time right now. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:49, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name confusion 

message: All information in this article refers to the Australian International Hotel School. The Angliss International Hotel School, part of the William Angliss Institute of TAFE, started in 2015. The Australian International Hotel School no longer exists. The title name needs to be changed, and all reference to Angliss International Hotel School removed. 
http://www.premier.vic.gov.au/labor-boosts-william-angliss-institute-to-support-jobs/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superchannel101 (talk • contribs) 02:43, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  All information refers to Australian International Hotel School
Talk:Long-snouted pipefish

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 14:32, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Longsnout pipefish

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 14:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Zhao Zhongxiang

message: Could we have some more details please? The Chinese version of the article mentions him holding a position within the China Wildlife Conservation Association; does anyone know more about this topic?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hackers on steroids (talk • contribs) 17:22, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zhao's environmentalist efforts 
Talk:Das Kapital, Volume III

message: As absurd as it is to have to state it there is no copyright on this work. Also the part titles are from the listed reference not the website, not that it would make a difference. For Volume I the entire TOC is listed. Lycurgus 14:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communism and [[Common Sense]] 

message: The text currently in the External Links § appears to be incomplete relative to the print version I quoted (ISBN 0-7178-0490-9 1967) so I was somewhat off base is saying there was no difference. 72.228.150.44 (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  i.e the linked text, the text at Marxists.org. 72.228.150.44 (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completeness of Online Texts 
Talk:Breather surface

message: By setting a as a time parameter and observing the function's behavior, I've found the function's domain to be inversely proportional to it. However, it's not a classic proportion. It seems to be exponential. If anyone can find or figure an equation relating the two, I'd appreciate it.Plynch22 15:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  a vs. domain
Talk:Against the Grain (Rory Gallagher album)

message: I'm going to do some editing of this page. I've got all the standard sources for Rory: his site, Allmusic, the book Rory Gallagher His Life and Times, but thought I would post here in case anyone is watching and has some other additional sources I should check out for this album in particular or for Rory in general. I'm especially interested are there really good fan sites? I would like to say about Against the Grain something like "although it was favorably reviewed many of his fans don't list it among their favorites" but the only evidence I have for that right now is my personal opinion and the very small number of Rory Gallagher fans I've known over the years so that's obviously not enough. Don't get me wrong, I like it, there are no bad Rory albums IMO but there are many other Rory albums I like more and it seems to me that Against the Grain is often rated higher than those by many critics. But unless I can find some justification for that such musings will remain in the Talk pages. Mdebellis (talk) 21:37, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good sources? Critics and Fans Opinions on Against the Grain? 
Talk:Melodia (album)

message: the album is actually called Melodia, not Brain dead, as stated here. How do I change that? Or do I have to create a whole different page for it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MisplacedKeys (talk • contribs) 02:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong title 
Talk:The All-Time Greatest Hits of Roy Orbison

message: The DCC/Steve Hoffman claim of using the original two-track analog tape sources has been disproven, per the two Sony mastering engineers (who would have made the anslog tape copies for DCC) and Sony vault services technicians who supplied the original sources to Battery Studios at 321 W 44th St. 2milgroove (talk) 14:43, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The main reason I'm reverting you is because your insertions don't make sense in the actual sentence. If you can make them make sense I will leave it unless someone else reverts. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute over original two-track analog tape sources.
Talk:Louis Armstrong and Duke Ellington: The Great Summit/Complete Sessions

message: This article covers the same ground as the article on the single disc album.  Why not merge the articles? Bts.smith (talk) 04:00, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger