lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chinese Farm (board game)

message: Rindis - thanks.  I'll fill in the article over the course of the next couple of weeks.  It would be good to hear from someone if doing these sort of extensive write-ups is worth the time.  I kind of enjoy them since they really force me to disect the game, but they're also a lot of work.
:Well, that is a difficult thing to judge. ^_^ I will say that this is the type of thing I'd like to see done for... well... everything. I personally wouldn't start here, but big deal. It might help me judge how well you're doing if you could write-up Bar-Lev as that's the only game on the subject I've actually played. ^_^;
:I do think the "Simulation Value" section is a good idea for any historical wargame. It's one of the reasons wargames exist (not the only one, but one that is pretty much unique to wargames). In fact, you're starting to explore just what a basic wargame article should look like. Right now, the main well developed wargame articles are Advanced Squad Leader, Squad Leader and Star Fleet Battles, all of which tend to focus on the the development and evolution of the game over time, not generally a concern with the singular releases you are discussing. PanzerBlitz is probably at about the level of article you are working on, but isn't all that well balanced or developed yet either.
:So, we have 'what the game is like', 'how the game represents history', and for long publication history games, its own history, as the main themes so far. An optional one is talking about any expansions to the original (I don't believe in giving expansions separate articles unless the game is deserving of a fairly beefy article on its own.) I'll try to think on this further, and see if I can come up with coherent thoughts about your efforts thus far. --Rindis 22:15, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James Steinberg

message: Why is the pages moved to Jim Steinberg? Clearly he is known as James Steinberg--Other dictionaries are better (talk) 21:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 05:46, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Model yachting

message: This stub page might fit in this article. --Kkmurray 14:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[Footy (model yacht)]]

message: The Model Yachting article is a generic article about model yachting.
The Footy (model yacht) article is about a specific class of model yacht. 
Including the Footy (model yacht) article in the  Model_yachting  article would necessitate all model yacht classes be included in the  Model_yachting  article for the purpose of completeness. Not a good ideas as there have been hundreds of model yacht classes over the past 100+ years.
Separate article for each model yacht class is best.
Synriga 00:39, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sentiment is toward no merge. Footy (model yacht) has expanded and no longer a stub. Merge flag removed.  --Kkmurray 03:07, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Do not merge [[Footy (model yacht)]] with this article.
Talk:Little Barrier Island

message: It provides just a little more than the bare basic information in order for this to be a stub. This should be Start-Class and the stub template on the article page removed. –MuZemike 07:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Avenue (talk) 10:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not really a stub 

message: Is this page the subject of any controversy? It came up on the Community Portal for improvement, so I tinkered with it a bit. deb (talk) 04:57, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New changes - minor 
Talk:Emma McCune

message: Hello I am from South Sudan living in America. I am reporting this article about Emma Teny. Riek Machar my Vice president was described as a "guerrilla leader" I find that very offensive and would like it rewritten or deleted. South Sudan has it's struggles like any other country that been freed. He is not a monster nore is he a "guerrilla leader" or "any type of animal" he his "Naath Nuer (Human being) Not an "Animal" Please take this down!! 2604:2D80:5393:3400:31BC:D7D9:4103:2129 (talk) 11:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrimination of South Sudan Vice president
Talk:Jane E. Norton

message: Is she related to another Colorado politician, Gale Norton? Wandering Courier (talk) 23:16, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gale Norton 
Talk:Janet Nguyen

message: There is absolutely zero discussion on her campaign finance disaster and the bad laywer advice.  This is hardly neutral, but reads more like a promotional piece that ended right after she won the election. hbdragon88 (talk) 06:04, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to add additional information on her after winning the election. DHN (talk) 06:06, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Elisha Standiford

message: This article was started using public domain information from the Biographical Directory of the United States Congress. LarryQ 15:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:France 5

message: I would dispute that la chaîne de la connaissance et du savoir translates as "the knowledge and science network". Connaissance and savoir both mean "knowledge" but different kinds of knowledge - through recognition and through learning. I would recommend it be changed. Dmccormac 15:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

message: The list of documentaries begins with six English titles, which are the only ones linked. At least two of those pages -- The Blue Planet and Naked Science -- make no mention of France, and there is no evidence that these programs have anything to do with this network.
--Thnidu (talk) 20:45, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Naked Science was broadcast by the channel (in a French version, of course) as "Superscience". It's likely the others were too. Whether they should be listed here like this is a different question. Probably not. Mcewan (talk) 00:39, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  dubious listing of documentaries 

message: If It's Not Wrong, Don't Fix It. There Is A Minor Error In The Youth Programmes,
Here's The Error:
Youth Program[edit]
Ben and Holly's Little Kingdom
Bob the Builder
Caillou
Dinosaur Train
Kate and Mim Mim
Little Charmers
Loopdidoo
Louie
Mofy
Mouk
The Mr. Men Show
Noddy, Toyland Detective
Peppa Pig
Peter Rabbit
Petz Club
PJ Masks
Sid the Science Kid
Space Racers
Tilly and Friends
Trucktown
Here's The Correction:
Youth Program[edit]
Ben and Holly's Little Kingdom
Bob the Builder
Caillou
Dinosaur Train
Kate and Mim Mim
Little Charmers
Loopdidoo
Louie
Mofy
Mouk
The Mr. Men Show
Noddy, Toyland Detective
Peppa Pig
Peter Rabbit
Petz Club
The PJ Masks
Sid the Science Kid
Space Racers
Tilly and Friends
Trucktown
Here It Is Again, This Time With The Correction In Bold
Youth Program[edit]
Ben and Holly's Little Kingdom
Bob the Builder
Caillou
Dinosaur Train
Kate and Mim Mim
Little Charmers
Loopdidoo
Louie
Mofy
Mouk
The Mr. Men Show
Noddy, Toyland Detective
Peppa Pig
Peter Rabbit
Petz Club
The PJ Masks
Sid the Science Kid
Space Racers
Tilly and Friends
Trucktown
If It's Wrong, Fix It, Otherwise Leave It The Same
--94.4.121.9 (talk) 17:32, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Error
Talk:Prilep, Kosovo

message: If the Ottomans only invaded the region in 1389, how does it come to have a 12th century mosque? Balkantropolis 15:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The village is older than the 1485 defter I referenced but the summary of the Dečani cyphers I found it in are constructed in a way that makes it seem that the entirety of Kosovo was purely inhabited by Serbs because of the names the tax payers had (which is pseudo-historical since many Albanians had Serbian names because they followed the patriarchate of Peć). Now what I’m wondering is: the name Prilep is only found in Bulgaria and North Macedonia, could the settlement have been established during Bulgarian rule? Agrotqr (talk) 14:12, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Prilep is a botanical name (прилеп) in Bulgarian-east South Slavic. You will find Prilepac in eastern Serbia and Prilep in Macedonia because those who founded them were east South Slavic/Bulgarian-speakers. The equivalent west South Slavic term evolved from Prilijepac, hence there is a Prilipac in central Serbia. Albanian Përlep and Aromanian Parleap evolved in contact with east South Slavic Prilep in the 8th-11th century, hence the positional change. Check how Albanian has come in contact with the name Prilep, Macedonia twice, hence two toponyms one early (Përlep), one late (Prilep).--Maleschreiber (talk) 00:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village origins?
Talk:Protected geographical indications in the European Union

message: First off, I should declare an interest in this as I've written/rewritten a couple of relevant pages. There are three related areas of EU legislation: Protected designation of origin (PDO), protected geographical indication (PGI) and Traditional Speciality Guaranteed (TSG) - the last one redirects to PDO, which, despite its being more info-rich, I suggest we do with PGI as it's probably best understood as related to (arguably) more important of the three designations. Wine is a huge part of this btw and there is another article, Quality Wines PSR which goes into more detail after which there are pages for the various European appellation-type designations. I suggest it takes the form of PDO (including PGI and TSG), then if any one part of this (like QWPSR and national appellation pages) is big enough, it can have its own page - mikaultalk 15:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I sometimes edit articles on foods and wines that come under this umbrella. I think the best approach is probably to merge them all and then, when the article is good enough, let it shatter into its components. —Ian Spackman 16:21, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Support merge. I would suggest this article as the target, since this term is the most comprehensive. All other names would redirect to this article (possibly to sections). The PGI disambiguation page needs modifying, too. --Boson 12:31, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Weak keep. These are three distinct labels; albeit in the same area. I would prefer different articles with one top article directing to the three. However, the articles need to be extended for this structure.  Arnoutf 11:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Maltepoo

message: Maltipoos,Maltapoos,Maltepoos ...well...we are here to discuss them .
I have found in my years of breeding that  Maltipoos are the best of the crossbreeds .By 'best " I mean they are happy ,carefree ,loving and people friendly .Most others are but for some reason the Maltipoo caught my attention right off the bat !
This is the general rule for maltipoos or at least for those I breed .
I would be more than happy to discuss things that pertain to the maltipoo .
So ,talk to me ! And add your photos of the Maltipoos here !Maltese-Poodle 23:00, 9 July 2007 (UT
ABOUT THIS SITE 
You need to remove any breeder from the links (refrences ) if you do not intend to put all breeders on ,considered an unfair evaluation of information .Most of what is said was copied from other sites ,so that would be an issue for other breeders that were online with similar info first but are redoing their sites at this time or have removed it to book form so it can no longer be copied ..
Just my thoughts but I am sure breeders that have been on the net longer ,giving out valauable information will take umbrage to it .
That should have been investagated first ,how long they have breed ,where they got their info before it was put on .
All the links you have are external links .You are an information center leading to other sites .
And nothing more .
All Links on these sites should be under EXTERNAL LINKS .
Thanks
I trust that my previous comment, pasted below, were removed on accident and not intentionally.
Removed the following link as it requires an external application to view:
You can also read the book about Maltipoos ,Meet the Maltipoo Book Series at ( http://www.flipviewer.com/fven/?opf=http://members2.myflipbooks.com/children123/meetthemaltipoo2.opf&ver=FlipAlbum )
This book is free to read.
Also removed the following link as it appears to primarily contain information about sales :
http://poos4u.net
See WP:LINKS for more information about appropriate external links. Maralia 01:24, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Published documents can be cited as references; organizations and people cannot be cited directly. Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources for further information on what constitutes a reliable source - you can't cite a person or an organization as a source, although you may cite their published statements. The key thing to remember is that I - or any other reader - should be able to see where your statements are coming from by looking at your sources, perhaps with the help of a good library. Zetawoof(ζ) 01:17, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Comments on renaming this to "Maltipoo" instead of "Maltepoo"?  I'm no expert, but working with a lot of veterinary clinics I almost never see the spelling "Maltepoo", while the spelling "Maltipoo" (and the mildly amusing "Multipoo") are everywhere...  Tomertalk 23:40, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  name
Talk:Thomas Bell (novelist)

message: Besides Out of This Furnace, were Bell's books widely published? I ask because I am having a hard time finding the other books written by Bell. Rickington (talk) 14:05, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: At the time that Bell's parents emigrated, there was no Slovak Republic - the village would have been in Autro-Hungary. Irish Melkite (talk) 00:59, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Slovak Republic
Talk:Hen and Chicken Islands

message: From google maps, Lady Alice Island (in the middle of the chicks) is at: -35.890281,174.734445
Taranga Island (Hen) is at: -35.962127,174.719839.  I don't know how to add it to the Article however.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.33.111.74 (talk) 21:25, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates

message: The islands have two sets of Māori names, one being those of Taranga and her sons:
Taranga: (The Hen)
Māui Mua: Motu Muka
Māui Pae: Huarewa
Māui Roto: Whatupuke
Māui Taha: Motu Wairaka and Tawatawa
Māui-Tikitiki-a-Taranga: Araara
Does anyone know why, or which set has priority? --Hugh7 (talk) 23:59, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Māori names

message: Is the formal name of the group really "Hen and Chicken Islands", with the chicken in the singular?  Is it not the "Hen and Chickens Islands"?  Richard New Forest (talk) 11:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural chickens?
Talk:Brent Glass

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:53, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Brian C. Mitchell

message: The article is notably silent on Mitchell's tenure at Bucknell.  Is there any stated reason for his departure? Racepacket (talk) 07:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Annan Bryce

message: The Brackenbury scholarships at Balliol ( there was always more than one) are ENTRANCE awards, so to mention Bryce's after mentioning his graduation from Jowett's Balliol is a trifle misleading.  See Wikipedia on Hannah Brackenbury, who endowed them. As MP for Inverness he opposed women's suffrage, a position not supported by many of his female constituents81.153.173.95 (talk) 20:14, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [untitled]
Talk:Brian Massumi

message: What is with the jargon in the lead "His work focuses on perception, affect and the virtual." I've commented it out until it can be explained. Actually, I'm just going to delete it. —Zujine|talk 20:24, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Burton J. Hendrick

message: There is no page for it. SoSivr (talk) 13:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The Yale Courant

message: Probably refers to Andrew W.Mellon. If this is so there should be a link to that page SoSivr (talk) 13:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Andrew Mellon
Category talk:Nandi Awards

message: In my brief look over a number of the pages in this category, including Nandi Awards it seems that none have references or citations (see WP:CITE for why they need these).  While I recognise that these awards exist, I am concerned for a number of reasons
# As I mentioned, there are no citations, to either the homepage for the awards, or to newspaper articles about them
# A number of the articles are incomplete (e.g. Nandi_Award_for_Best_Director) or empty (e.g. Nandi Award for Best Female Dubbing Artist and Nandi Award for Best Special Effects).  
# None of the 'awards' articles have a description of what the award is given for.
As such, I'm suggesting the following, 
# The homepage for the awards (if it exists) and links to newspapers are given on the main page Nandi Awards.  
# Minor award pages are deleted and rolled into the main page
# Major award pages are given a description, appropriately cited
# Examination of similar award categories (such as Golden_Globe so as to reuse design features and ideas 
As I am not familiar with these awards at all, nor in fact with this sort of article and category, I won't be taking part in this revamp.  
~AFA ʢűčķ¿Ю 15:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for bringing this topic and agree it needs rethinking. The citations for last few years exist from some online news papers, but for many years it is difficult to get them. I am okay to bring them into one page, but problem with that aproach is they will be too many lines(40 per category and there are around 30 catagories). I have lot of other entries I need to fill in, when I get time. Government of A.P. gives these awards every year. mlpkr 21:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If there is a homepage for the Awards it would be easy to verify the information would it not?  Except I can't find a homepage ...  Here is an idea, for the awards you do have information for, could you simply have the years that you have?  And then add the lines as you get the information ...  Anyway, I'll leave it up to you to decide. ~AFA ʢűčķ¿Ю 16:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements
Talk:Caleb Thomas Winchester

message: Can we find a reliable source confirming that Caleb Thomas Winchester is the "Professor Winchester" that Mark Twain meant when he said this: "I don't believe any of you have ever read Paradise Lost, and you don't want to. That's something that you just want to take on trust. It's a classic, just as Professor Winchester says, and it meets his definition of a classic -- something that everybody wants to have read and nobody wants to read."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.161.67.209 (talk) 18:15, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of a "classic"
Talk:Calvin M. Woodward

message: I put the notability tag on this page. I'm unsure what makes Mr. Woodward notable. Was it the training method? The article does not make this clear, so it just reads like a person who made non-notable contributions to society. tedder (talk) 06:27, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the notability tag.  Notability is really about availability of information from non-primary sources, and this fellow has biographies in Appletons' and the Dictionary of American Biography, which I think are sufficient on that score.  I copied a lead from Wikisource, and Appletons' talks him up a bit, and between those the contribution which led to his notability is clearer I think. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability tag
Talk:Camilla Stivers

message: ekh 02:59, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

message: Content
The lead section is evident, the overview is useful however should include a formatting that is similar to the most bibliographies which include a concise overview of the profession the individual, the date of birth and significance, the information provide doesn't give a date of birth of death(if necessary. 
The key points/sub-points are some what unclear
The contribution need more information about her personal life howeever this is only a draft so its a respectable amount of information
The points that are presented in this text are well supported
Thesis and analytic focus
The focus of the topic is clear
The information seems appropriate to the case
Representativeness
 The contribution could use more perspective on other scholars views on her and her work
The tone is appropriate however for the information given
Sourcing details
Claims aren't cited with references and doesn't really have many sources
Neutrality
The article has some non-neutral tones without supporting citations.
No, The article sometimes states opinions as facts
Yes
The Coverage is very balanced just could use more elements and content to the paper 
Readability
A.
The paper is very well written
Sentences are carefully crafted to be grammatically correct
Yes
Yes
Yes
B.
Yes
Yes
Yes
C.
No
D.
No there should be pictures however \
'''
Open Ended Questions'''
Question One
The topic its self seems interesting and she seems like an important scholar in academia
Question Two
More Content 
Pictures  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.26.251.150 (talk) 00:36, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review:
Talk:John C. Goodman

message: This is one of the most transparently adulatory Wikipedia bios I’ve ever read. After reading it you would not be aware of Goodman’s long stint as head of the National Center for Policy Analysis and his firing by the board for a reported office romance and mismanagement. 
https://www.dmagazine.com/business-economy/2017/07/how-hubris-and-mismanagement-brought-down-dallas-national-center-for-policy-analysis/ Nicmart (talk) 12:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, it's bad. I added a COI tag in February 2019 and it doesn't look like much of anything has changed. Marquardtika (talk) 13:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosy scenario
Talk:Carl Elliott (philosopher)

message: This guy is really interesting and this entry doesn't tell much about it. For a beginning source, I would recommend the biographical background in this article (although it's behind a paywall): 
http://www.sciencemag.org/content/344/6186/793.full
Science 23 May 2014:
Vol. 344 no. 6186 pp. 793-797
DOI: 10.1126/science.344.6186.793
A lonely crusade
Jennifer Couzin-Frankel
I would also recommend moving that long CV out of the introduction and into a separate section below, if it belongs at all. There are Wikipedia guidelines against writing biographies as if they were resumes, although I'm not going to look them up and cite them now. --Nbauman (talk) 04:35, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really early stub-class