Talk:Management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

message: I would like to know if the different medications are prescribed based on the three different types of ADHD. These types are: Primarily Inattentive, Primarily Hyperactive/Impulsive, and Combined Type. I am diagnosed with Primarily Inattentive [commonly referred to as ADD] and have been prescribed Concerta, then Adderall XR, and now Daytrana; none of these have produced any effect whatsoever. If anyone has any information on a) if different types of meds are prescribed for the different types of ADHD and b) information on treatment of ADHD/preferrably treatment of Primarily Inattentive/ADD type. And c) any explanation as to why the medication does not work? I have an idea that I am willing to go into depth about if you ask. I have read about people claiming the medications are simply placebos in the sense that the meth/amphetamines do not affect concentration. Is there truth to these statements? MattTheMan 01:39, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered on talk page Sifaka talk 20:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ADHD Types and Treatments 

message: I think that maybe the descriptions of the different kinds of extended release drugs should be in a table off to the right next to all the FDA medications, but I don't know how to do this or which templete to use so please help!!! ThanksEdward Bower 05:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended release drugs 

message: This page needs a lot of work per WP:MOS, and the title should be adjusted to Treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, Management of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder or Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder treatment.  Unless there is disagreement, I'd like to put the article  and do extensive cleanup of the formatting and other problems with WP:MSH and other WP:MOS issues (I already made the fixes per WP:FN, but there's more to do).  Wikilinking also needs attention, per WP:MOS and WP:CONTEXT; common terms should not be linked, while the first occurrence of important terms should be. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:19, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since DavidRuben started on the cleanup, I went ahead and did it.  Wikilinking still needs attention, and references need cleanup.  All sources should identify a publisher, author and date when available, and websources should indicate a last access date.  See WP:CITE/ES.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 13:40, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the article name changingEdward Bower 15:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just picked a name, not really knowing what to call it. I picked Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder treatments because it was shorter than Treatments for Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder or such. Change away. I am not particularly familiar with naming conventions for these kinds of articles. Just for refs I like the first and third one you suggested, User:SandyGeorgia. I see if I can do any cleanup. I just kind of forked it and left it without doing anything because I didn't have the time to flesh it out much. Sifaka talk 22:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manual of style 

message: I have just removed two dismally wrong and outdated pieces of information relating to Tourette syndrome, tics and tic disorders, so I am concerned about the sources used in this article.  One of the incorrect pieces of info was from Arnold, which is used extensively in this article, and doesn't appear to be up to date. See Treatment of Tourette syndrome.  I'm continuing on the ref cleanup; PMIDs need to be added. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found another error sourced to Arnold; depression is not a personality disorder.  There are too many errors, so I'm adding a disputed tag until they are sorted out.  I'm also concerned that I don't see any of the names of the most recognized researchers in ADHD.  Where are Wilens, Biederman, Spencer et al among the sources ??  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:34, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for fixing all my mistakes and misinformation. If you want to make one of those list things about fixing this articles, you seem to be a very good editor so you'd probably know how to make a nice list about that.Edward Bower 15:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're going to take out any sources that you aren't sure what I meant by the statements and know that it's not flat out wrong (this would not include the error about Tourrette Syndrome and Depression), it'd be helpful if you could list them somewhere on this talk page after you take them out, so I could try to explain their importance. ThanksEdward Bower 15:42, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will do that when the content is salvageable, but those examples weren't.  They were just completely, irreparably, wrong.  New information from new sources needs to be added.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:08, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ya sorry that they were wrong, I didn't know they were but I now that it's been said I trust that those were wrongEdward Bower 16:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

text: On second thought, since the article structure makes little sense and the TS info didn't fit into either, I moved it to its own section at the bottom.  Since a very high percentage of clinically-referred patients with ADHD also have tic disorders, it might as well have its own section.  And by the way, so should bipolar.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:51, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea about having it's own section on the buttom, I think that maybe the format should be "Endorsed by the APA", then "Comorbid Disorders" and in the comorbid disorders it should first say somethign about how, as you said spectrum disorders are treated usually treated off-label.. (and more information too), and in the "Comorbid Disorder" section there should be subsections for Tic Disorders, BiPolar(maybe anxiety). And then after that it should talk about the "treatment not endorsed by the APA"(orwhatever the correct type of title ya'll decided on). Edward Bower 16:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So I moved it because I don't know how often you're checking the talk page and I didn't want us to be working on two different versions of the same article, but if you feel that it should be below, then maybe it should. And also I obviously did this very quickly so the main part of comorbid disorder section had very little time dedicated to making it (like 1 minute), so any help there would be appreciated alsoEdward Bower 17:03, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done about all I can do for now; this should give you some good directions for continued work on the article and indications of the work still needed.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 17:23, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources used 

message: The article doesn't use the most reliable up to date sources, isn't comprehensive, doesn't cover the topic thoroughly, and gives undue weight to unproven treatments, without presenting balance regarding the unproven treatments.  It needs extensive work to correct these deficiencies.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:14, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which unproven treatments?Edward Bower 15:39, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A lot of the content in the "Not endorsed" section is unbalanced and doesn't present NPOV info; that is, info that disputes some of those treatments.  SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't author anything in the not endorsed section so I can't defend any of thatEdward Bower 16:13, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I authored that section when I originally forked it and honestly I don't know much about the disputes. I just separated the treatments into on label and off label. I didn't mean to show any kind of bias for or against them, I was just trying to categorize the information that was in the section. I suppose I can add a sentence to the top of the off label section that since these are not approved by the FDA, any supposed benefits in treating ADHD have not been rigorously proven. Sifaka talk 23:03, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not comprehensive, and not balanced 

message: This section had a copy edit on it and its title line was benefits. I think this section is not particularily relevant to the article because it isn't strictly related to ADHD. A better home for most of this would probably be in the various articles on the drugs being described. A better section might be how these specific benefits improve ADHD symptoms which seems to be rather lacking in this article. I am removing it because it kind of stuck out. Discuss here or on my talk page. Sifaka talk 00:03, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  paragraph on benefits of  dextrothreomethylphenidate, dextroamphetamine 

message: I have been doing some cleaning up in the article. There are a few concerns/ to do list things I have. 
*First is that we are missing a paragraph on the non-stimulant medications like Staterra. That would be and incredibly valuable paragraph to have because it is not listed and such medications are wisely used. 
*Someone explain what the osmosis method is under the controlled drug release section.
*Some info in this article sounds like medical advice. I cut down on that as much as I could but I don't know what to say. 
*I also replaced as many brand names with substance names when possible except in drug comparisons. I think this prevents an advertising like feel to it.
*I deleted some stuff about high IQ patients benefiting from some kinds of drugs versus low IQ patients. It sounded kind of POV.
*I think we need some more references coming from different sources, confirming some of these claims. I am not an expert, but I think this article needs attention from one.
* I changed the medical paragraph name and moved it to the bottom after co morbid disorders have been discussed so it makes sense. I also changed the title.
If anyone has concerns, would like to work on anything I suggested go for it. Sifaka talk 00:35, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up, Staterra, and medical advice 

message: I removed this paragraph as well because it seemed to be a rather listy lists of random data paragraph. All the information in this could be moved to sections where the individual drugs, types of medications versus one another, and comorbid disorders (some not yet created or discussed) are/will be. I am putting it here where the bits and pieces can be added to their appropriate places as the article improves. This is the last of the major changes I will be making for a while, so it may take me a while (like a couple hours or a day) to get back to my talk page and this article. Put concerns there anyway. Sifaka talk 01:01, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medication selection based on patient psychiatry 

message: Specific stuff that could use some improvement (some from above) Sifaka talk 01:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement Drive. Stuff to work on.

message: I believe I accurately explained how Concerta uses osmosis but I don't know where these ingredients fit into Concerta, if anyone does please add them into the osmosis section: butylated hydroxytoluene, phosphoric acid, poloxamer, sodium chloride, stearic acid, succinic acid, synthetic iron oxides, titanium dioxideEdward Bower 21:26, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Osmosis

message: ADHD doesn't only affect Americans, I don't think the article should be so blatantly based around how the FDA classifies the drugs. Instead how about "recognized medications" or something more neutral... for instance methamphetamine isn't approved for use in Australia so methamphetamine is approved for use in some countries such as the US.
cyclosarin 02:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FDA

message: I've removed the article tag as I don't see it being necessary.  If I am wrong, go ahead and comment and make the change back.JohnsonRon 17:06, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Tag

message: what about neurofeedback? i've heard that is pretty good for ADHD. also read somewhere that statins (cholestorol medicine) can even reverse certain learning conditions including ADHD. editors please look this up. it would be nice to have ALL possible treatments/cures listed on here so people can try everything and see what works for them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.190.38.106 (talk • contribs) 14:22, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, listing all possible treatments/cures isn't really the role of Wikipedia. Additions here must be attributable to reliable sources (that is, they must have been published somewhere reliable before—we only report on findings). Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  neurofeedback and statins? 

message: I have removed the generic globalization tag from this article.  If you think the tag is deserved, please feel free to restore it -- but please also add a clear explanation right here on this talk page.  Your actual concerns are much more likely to be adequately addressed if you identify them.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Globalization tag

message: I believe info from ADHD controversy article should be moved to this article. Please have a look at that article and make suggestions. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder controversies here in talk. I believe the whole concerns about medication section could be moved to this article. It may require editing, edit on that page or make suggestions here in talk.
Thanks...--scuro (talk) 15:39, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible transfer from Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder controversies

message: Hello all... 
An image used in the article, specifically :Image:Adderallrx.jpg, has a little bit of a licensing issue.  The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive.  It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard.  As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article.  If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.
You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 01:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image needs replacement 

message: Wondering if we should change the name of the article to ADHD management from treatment.  Management implies a persistent disorder well treatment indicates an acute disorder. ie. you treat pneumonia you manage diabetes. 
Doc James (talk) 14:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: JMH - you may want to wait for feedback before making such a considerable change.  You have allowed what, all of one hour?  --Vannin (talk) 15:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It called being BOLD.  It is easy to change it back if people disagree.--Doc James (talk) 16:07, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the name change. There are few if any that claim that there is a bona-fide 'cure' for ADHD, other than waiting it out. Certainly stimulants are all about 'suppressing core symptoms' which does not constitute a 'cure'. Unomi (talk) 04:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change name 

message: Lie N (November 1998). "[Central stimulants in adults with AD/HD. Do they help?]" (in Norwegian). Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen. 118 (27): 4223–7. .
The Medline translation of the abstract is
This article is a review of five controlled studies of the efficacy of methylphenidate in adults with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD). All five had a placebo cross-over design. In one of the studies, patients noted from the side-effects whether they were taking methylphenidate or placebo, and it is, in fact, unlikely that any of the studies were blind. The diagnostic criteria used in two of the studies were not appropriate according to present knowledge, leaving three samples of subjects meeting the present criteria for AD/HD. In one study, the patient material was extremely selective: 74% of subjects belonged to social class 1 and 2, and only 35% of those who came for treatment were eligible. Only one study has an acceptable (though not perfect) design. In this study of patients in a psychiatric clinic, no difference was found between methylphenidate and placebo. In two studies, subjects who improved on methylphenidate were followed up. Of the total of 24 subjects in these two samples, only four continued with methylphenidate after 3-12 months; two of them suffered from narcolepsy and one was a substance abuser. Thus, the efficacy of methylphenidate on AD/HD in adults has not been demonstrated. Present research is more against than in favour of its existence.
How does "efficacy of methylphenidate on AD/HD in adults has not been demonstrated" become htom (talk) 19:33, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current reference 31 use 

message: The tag has been on the article well over one year. Most articles need improvement; I don't think this one needs it any more than most scientific articles. If there is no objection in a week or two, I think the tag needs to go. Cresix (talk) 01:43, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert tag 

message: This is very US centric. Would be like dividing into Health Canada verses none Health Canada approved.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:11, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The division in FDA verses non FDA

message: I think that Neurofeedback should be actualized. One meta-analysis called Efficacy of Neurofeedback Treatment in ADHD: the Effects on Inattention, Impulsivity and Hyperactivity: a Meta-Analysis  (from 2009 incl. 15 studies and 1194 people) draws the conclusion "Therefore, in line with the AAPB and ISNR guidelines for rating clinical efficacy, we conclude that neurofeedback treatment for ADHD can be considered “Efficacious and Specific” (Level 5) with a large ES for inattention and impulsivity and a medium ES for hyperactivity.". The full analysis is available here:PDF.  Regards --Cyrus Grisham (talk) 14:36, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neurofeedback 

message: The article should have a section about improving sleep. Children who don't sleep long enough (link) or who snore (or have other breathing difficulties during sleep) (link) are more likely to be hyperactive - and getting more or better sleep improves the condition. --New Thought (talk) 09:38, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I do so agree with you.  Children with circadian rhythm sleep disorders (CRSD) are also sleep deprived.  There have been cases where the ADHD diagnosis disappeared when the child was diagnosed with (and treated for) sleep apnea or CRSDs.  --Hordaland (talk) 03:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sleep 

message: I've tagged this as it's a sprawling mess. Many of the problems are those present in another article and detailed by SandyGeorgia in her comment here. Please see the wikilinks in her comment especially WP:MEDRS.
There's reliance on out-of-date material as well as random selection of primary studies, laypress or other primary sources being used to source content throughout. For such a well-studied topic where high quality reliable sources exist these should be used to develop an article without undue weight or other problems. --92.6.211.228 (talk) 15:24, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed all of these tags - WP:DRIVEBYTAGGING Seppi333 (talk) 02:05, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Mess

message: Could the tagger please give some details of what is wanted and why. If the tagger intends to make the changes soon then we don't need many details. If it is to be left to someone else then a lot more information would be required. Op47 (talk) 20:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move tag 

message: This article is frankly terrible.  I feel like the whole article reads like someone is trying to convince me not to take ADHD medicines, warning of the CRAZY dangers of stimulants in the treatment of ADHD.  I'm sure some of the statements are true, but others are un-backed and rather alarming bits of mis-information.
The largest case of which is the repeated statement of "there is no research showing long term effectiveness of psychostimulants".  This is blatantly false.  I found two articles today (read 26 and 27) demonstrating that usage of psychostimulants of many different types was marked by increases through neural plasticity of dendritic spinal density and connectivity in key regions of the brain (such as the PFC and nucleus accumbens, two regions with abnormally low development in people with ADHD).
Also, I find the section on antipsychotic medications particularly alarming, due to the fact the same article referred to global decreases in dendritic density in the prefrontal cortex after useage of these SPECIFIC drugs.  Uses this by name.  And granted, the review is fairly new (2012) but some of the studies it references date all the way back to 1988.  
This article seems to be written more as a witch-hunt against medication as a cure for ADHD, and while some of these concerns are well-founded, the sad truth is many of these statements are not founded in the hard scientific literature.
((see references 26 and 27 in the main body text))
 Nott All Who Wander 16:18, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone?? 

message: I have blanked the section below in the article and moved it here: the fact that one drug or another are restricted or not in a country or another is of no relevance whatsoever for an article on the treatment on ADHD. This does not mean that it is not a relevant fact to have in the articles on the drugs, but not here... I doubt that the article on cancer therapy says which of the cancer treatments are restricted (I hope most) and which can be bought in the local pharmacy since it is of little use for the patient (as once the doctor gives him the treatment he is going to be able to buy it).
In summary: great info to have on the article on stimulants, not really relevant here. IMO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.113.19.53 (talk) 20:50, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Blanked section

message: Reasoning for this section it seems to be as follows: treatment for ADHD is with stimulants. Many people now misuse stimulats, therefore it fits in the ADHD treament article. However this is a non sequitur: the fact that many people misuse stimulants is irrelevant for the treatment of ADHD either with stimulants or non pharma treatments. Moreover, non of the refs (from a fast view) relate this problem to the management of ADHD. The section however would make absoulte sense in the stimulant article. Copied below in case anybody can change it into something usable for this or specially other articles.--87.113.19.53 (talk) 20:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Another blanked section

message: For background context, D1-type and D2-type dopamine receptors differentially regulate cognitive processes and, in the striatum where the mesolimbic pathway and nigrostriatal pathway (2 of the 4 primary dopamine pathways) terminate, are mostly localized in different populations of neurons which activity-dependently modulate opposite effects on cognitive processes (primarily reward perception and motor function).  In the prefrontal cortex, D1-type (primarily D1) receptors activation-dependently modulate working memory (a metric for attention span) and inhibitory control (the cognitive process required for terminating procrastination behavior, among others).  These are the 2 primary aspects of cognitive control that are impaired in ADHD - the indirect activation of these receptors is also the mechanism of action in dopamine neurons by which psychostimulants improve a range of ADHD symptoms associated with these cognitive processes.
All of this is explicitly stated and cited in several sentences under ADHD#Pathophysiology (covers cognitive control in ADHD, DA/NE-dependent regulation of these processes, and the associated pathways) + Amphetamine#Medical (some overlap in topical coverage as ADHD pathophysiology) and Amphetamine#Enhancing performance (covers the dopamine and norepinephrine receptors in the PFC that mediate improvements in these cognitive processes by psychostimulants). 
Based upon a cursory read of the cited reviews in the antipsychotics section, the antipsychotics with treatment efficacy for ADHD are D2-type antagonists, where their clinical effects are believed to arise through inhibiting these receptors in the mesolimbic dopamine pathway (linked above) in the striatum, specifically in the subpopulation of neurons that express D2-type receptors.  To quote one of the cited antipsychotic review:
.
The current section is a gross oversimplification of what I've stated above. D1-type antagonist antipsychotics exacerbate ADHD symptoms, so this is a pretty significant issue. I'll fix this issue sometime tomorrow after I read through the cited reviews and copyedit and import the content that I mentoned from the ADHD and amphetamine sections. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 19:56, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit: nevermind, I ended up fixing this problem using the refs already cited since their findings reflect what I described above.  These refs indicate that: antipsychotics have efficacy for treatment of ADHD+behavioral disorders, antipsychotics have established efficacy and are approved for certain behavioral disorders without comorbidity, and there is no evidence of treatment efficacy using any antipsychotic drug for ADHD without comorbid disorders.  I edited the section to reflect this, so it's no longer necessary to import the content I mentioned. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 23:32, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antipsychotics & stimulants 

message: I might have missed something, but I can't see any mention of tranquillisers being used to treat those with ADHD. I'm not a doctor, but had tranquillisers prescribed for mine and I'm sure I can't be the only one. I'm well aware of the reasons amphetamines are prescribed, but it does make sense to give tranquillisers to children who are hyperactive (ignoring the attention deficit side of the condition). 166.175.59.150 (talk) 09:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tranquillisers 

message: Since lack of ability to focus is the hallmark of ADHD, it occurred to me that Yoga would be intuitively a good therapy and exercise in developing mindfulness and ability to focus and to calm.  I found this article most interesting:
* Kids Yoga May Help Relieve ADHD (Huffington Post, 2013-11-20)
This includes several links to original research on the potential benefits of Yoga as a therapy to treat ADHD, including:
*Peer-Mediated Multimodal Intervention Program for the Treatment of Children with ADHD in India: One-Year Followup (ISRN Pediatr. 2012)
*The effects of yoga on the attention and behavior of boys with Attention-Deficit/hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (University of Sydney, 2014)
*The effectiveness of body-oriented methods of therapy in the treatment of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): results of a controlled pilot study (Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2006)
I'm neither an expert in ADHD, nor a medical expert, but I am sure others here would be interested and qualified to explore this intriguing, non-drug approach to managing and treating ADHD.  At least, I think the article would benefit from a balanaced and critical examination of this approach.
Enquire (talk) 02:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoga as treatment for ADHD? 

message: Below link is removed for broken , ads relate,relate reason. 
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.225.99.194 (talk) 12:29, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just removed the URL fields, which is all that needed to be done. Graham87 11:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ads and broken 

message: Does anyone think there should be more information regarding the mechanisms of extended release and instant release stimulants?
Also there is data that shows that continued use of amphetamines lowers response, or creates a tolerance to the drug
Rhowensd (talk) 22:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A rat study from 1984 is not good evidence, it's terrible evidence. We should maybe talk about the release mechanisms a bit more, but I don't see it as a major priority, as there are a plethora of release mechanisms used and getting information about each drug's release mechanism can be difficult. I included some minimal information on the format of each methylphenidate-based med in both this article (under the methylphenidate subsection) and in the methylphenidate article. I believe that if we focus too much on this we may end up falling out of scope, so perhaps you should focus on improving the various wiki pages on time-delayed release mechanisms instead? Garzfoth (talk) 22:33, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended Release and Tolerance Data 

message: I've temporarily reverted your addition to this table. I intend to add this back tomorrow in this and other articles that include a table of amphetamine pharmaceuticals, but I need to add a few rowspans to the cells in the vyvanse, ProCentra, and Zenzedi row entries to better format the table when I add their other dosage forms.  
I'd do this right now if I weren't editing from my cell phone (it'd be a pain in the ass to do on a phone since I'd need to add "rowspan=2" to like a dozen cells and update the vyvanse reference to the current drug label in 3 or 4 articles).  FWIW, I think that covering the other dosage forms is a good idea. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 02:11, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine with me, I'll just leave the amphetamine table alone for now and let you handle the changes. Garzfoth (talk) 04:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: amphetamine pharmaceutical table

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090815091925/http://www.hta.ac.uk/execsumm/summ1023.htm to http://www.hta.ac.uk/execsumm/summ1023.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:33, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The table on page 2-3 of this ref might be useful for the table in this article: .  Adding this here for later. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 22:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref for table 

message: Aripiprazol is not on the list even though it can be very effective. 
https://watermark.silverchair.com/11-3-439.pdf?token=AQECAHi208BE49Ooan9kkhW_Ercy7Dm3ZL_9Cf3qfKAc485ysgAAAkYwggJCBgkqhkiG9w0BBwagggIzMIICLwIBADCCAigGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAeBglghkgBZQMEAS4wEQQMeb7rsz5QwVZCgABqAgEQgIIB-eHI4Gk3FRPSaEZvkBwcXwxlt-FXwmnx7mU85129Q__Bb55dIwW1cONIpdHAZb1P9OiwxaXOX-byqxlwMlXIED6Q0KRIp0o0HaxwKdMbUbBNZc4AWI1RbEzFoU4mksXWjDvTe-IEZYqNMOmKPkujdh9FCT_jgiuZPcamnvJVpAuyh9Oc7jATqU2NOI9tQdcu0afnKBs9kFIMIoSTn7Jb4JN_hGFjZhToB7Be_1U_QxFZb8JzVMqcZX9gh3u6Vg1cxf6CaDJK2XFEdR0cgCifyhkLNn5zkcnor73NOKM7SGSHaC7SF5bBIMwF7YMkexnu5j8rC-Vb_L_aH-jz-X2-5j4Mzb7MR9w8MKbSmpj4AviHYHTZ7N3AoO9-aBFqSbu4INt0D-P9cXP3Tbr4EWgg6sfCTiBcj2-pFQ45wCXGWLyJfyTcKMobFGLcBypGXbeS6h7sjshh2zcNOq77j1IgzJDSbkObArKwPzjb_gSw78NE41s4cuOK9HUDPhd45h5UXmPxvS5xdsw6LAgKOnyox8zz7d5-8KVWUolRLJ5-DgkbbUi618OZfoIy7TC1-ogFG0hEu7N6jfeBkjIYUyVk4yTibkp2LKwQfD3M462Kw1ciOMgscwTB_5R0qOj9vS8-ookYzghtL3ZnnNkDHSY38tud2e3R4cH1F-I  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A03F:4E9F:CD00:B433:F5FA:EAB0:FC42 (talk) 20:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aripiprazol 

message: — Assignment last updated by Cament1 (talk) 15:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Technical and Scientific Communication

message: Hello, I am a college student and one of my projects is to edit this page based upon a Literature Review I completed. This page did not mention autism as a common comorbidity with ADHD. It is actually the most common and I think there is room for future research on this topic. I did not see this listed anywhere on the talk page so I though I would go ahead and mention it.  Smummert1 (talk) 20:54, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right about the comorbidity. If you know of something notable regarding this that affects ADHD management, please add it to the page.Transient-understanding (talk) 06:22, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autism