Talk:Melton railway line

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Melton railway line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050101032821/http://www.metlinkmelbourne.com.au/transport_maps/melb_train_map.php to http://www.metlinkmelbourne.com.au/transport_maps/melb_train_map.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090915123315/http://www4.transport.vic.gov.au/vtp/projects/melton.html to http://www4.transport.vic.gov.au/vtp/projects/melton.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:19, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: I have removed all content and requested the page to be deleted as per the consensus of a merge discussion. HoHo3143 (talk) 03:22, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Should redirect to Ballarat V/Line rail service NOT Serviceton railway line
*A "Melton" physical line only existed for 1 year, 11 months, 30 days (in 1884-1886) while the line was built from both ends simultaneously between Sunshine and Gordon (which already continued on to Ballarat).
*A Melton service existed for many years as a metropolitan service operated by a regional operator (metropolitan zone 2 ticket was able to be used instead of a regional ticket), this warranted the original Melton line page. With the introduction of Myki ticketing system (extending zone 2 to be able to be used in regional areas), the Melton service was merged by the operator (V/Line) in to the Ballarat service, and although it was still appearing on some metropolitan maps, there is no longer official references to a seperate Melton service.
-- ThylacineHunter (talk) 13:47, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Prior to it being redirected, the article was primarily about a physical railway line with a mention of the services that operated on it. Thus it is correct that it be redirected to Serviceton railway line, being a section of that line. If it was an article primarily about a service, as Ballarat V/Line rail service is, it would have been named Melton V/Line rail service. Most of the incorrect links have now been fixed, it is only a few lingering in the services section of infoboxes that now need to be merged. Keindunk (talk) 23:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The name would have been "Melton V/Line rail service" if the line was purely a regional service (as in Ballarat V/Line rail service, Bendigo V/Line rail service, etc.), but as it was a metropolitan service the was operated by the regional operator (because the track was not electrified) it was named as the other metropolitan services are (Sunbury railway line, Pakenham railway line, etc.). -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 01:15, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This page should have been renamed to something like "Melton Metro rail service" just before it was redirected to the "Ballarat V/Line rail service". It wasn't done as this would have been an unnecessary renaming. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 02:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect note