Talk:I Am Cuba

message: Whew! I did my best to clean this up - I'm kind of interested in the film now however! - Ta bu shi da yu 12:36, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I am sorry Tabu, I forgot to pass it throught the officce spell checker, as I usualy do. I know my written english is worthless... --Alexandre 18:13, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No, not at all! This is an excellent article and the beauty of Wikipedia is that an expert can dump all their knowledge onto the wiki, then lots of people can assist with copyediting. Please, keep up the good work. Only one thing: could I ask where you got your sources of information from? We'll then add this to a references section. See Cite your sources for the sort of information we need. - Ta bu shi da yu 03:03, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: Well most of the things I got from watching the film. The rest from random pieces of information (an article in a local newspaper, small blogs, talking) wich cannot be cited.. Thanks, but something I am not is an expert. I am very glad to see how the article grew up a bit. I suggest you to see it, you'll probably love it...
--Alexandre Van de Sande 21:59, 16 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Typically verbs, even short verbs such as "am," are capitalized in titles, so this article should probably be called I Am Cuba. However, if the film or its promotional materials specifically uses this capitalization, then it is still acceptable. Is this the case? Derrick Coetzee 04:18, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know! I didn't realise this, and moved the article beforehand as Cuba had not been capitalised... anyone else know? - Ta bu shi da yu 09:58, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and fixed this. I'll move it back upon any reasonable protest. Derrick Coetzee 16:08, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization of title 

message: It said that the camera was passed from person to person, but this would have been imposible for the last pard where it leaves the window and continues through mid air. Prehaps wires were used?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Prof. Finn (talk • contribs) 12:17, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: @Prof. Finn Absolutely. The idea with the vest doesn't make sense at two points in the shot: 1. when the camera first is hovering over the street and in the process of retraction is pulled through a fence; 2. at the end of the scene when the camera goes out again over the street, far out. There's  a better explanation in the German version of this article,  describing a special camera rig. Prozentzwanzig (talk) 14:01, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coffin tracking shot 

message: The copyright to this movie was restored to Rigma America Corporation, under the GATT treaty. http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/1998/63fr5141.html (see under title "Ya--Kuba") 69.110.235.152 (talk) 06:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighted status 

message: There is no sentences about scenes that was shot on the infrared film. Why? Soy Cuba is partially IR movie. 87.236.41.183 (talk) 09:09, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IR scenes 

message: I watched it today and the language was mostly Spanish with some English in the cabaret scenes of the first story.
When is Russian spoken?
--Error (talk) 02:05, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: What does this article mean that the american presence cannot somehow be described as anti-american. They are represented as the epitome of capitalist excess and vice, a degradation of the country. When the narrator continues to speak of Cuba as a land of tears and anguish it is directly insinuated that this is a result of actions in the narrative, implicating directly American's, American companies, American modernity, or the global political elite (dominated by American). Besides it isn't cited... I'll come back to this... Adrianturcato (talk) 17:34, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: American Presence