lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nami juji jime

message: The graphics link appears to be broken.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.174.29.196 (talk) 03:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken graphics link 

message: The image. Is this Nami juji jime or Kata juji jime? I think the possibility of Kata juji jime is somewhat higher.--Hiroshi takahashi (talk) 06:37, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, good question I noticed this possible discrepancy too.  In the image Galvao's visible hand is palm down facing toward his opponent.  This conflicts with the description of this technique in the article which currently states that "The technique is called 'normal' because the backs of both hands  of the person applying the choke are facing the person who is applying the choke." 2607:FEA8:BEA0:A38:79DF:58EC:B1F7:12DE (talk) 03:16, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nami or Kata?
Talk:Gyaku Jūji-jime

message: I think the correct character for "jime" or "shime" in this context (meaning choke) must be 締, not 絞.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.26.32.203 (talk) 20:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In modern Japan, 絞 is more common. The same is true for the Kodokan.--Hiroshi takahashi (talk) 10:32, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Proper Naming
Talk:List of early Lithuanian dukes

message: Is "duke" necessarily the best term to describe these people?  Presumably that is not what they were called in Lithuanian.  In England and Scotland the title "duke" was a relatively late important during the middle ages.  Are they now mainly known from Latin records? PatGallacher (talk) 18:37, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, (West/Latin) European terminology for these regions is fairly confusing, especially because in diplomatic correspondence, titles of rulers of these regions would sometimes be translated to Latin or to the vernacular. That means that even today, the English language has trouble translating titles like these, because its translations have a different historical background. I think, quite similar to Russian knjaz', which is also often translated as duke, the Lithuanian kunigaikštis is best translated as prince (as in Fürst/ruler). 'Grand duke' would be great prince, as the 'primus inter pares' (see?) of Lithuanian princes. 2001:1C02:1901:ED00:8835:389:2C05:D8AD (talk) 10:30, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ude hishigi ashi gatame

message: Ive noticed a lot of the articles on canonical Judo techniques only describe the techniques in the most basic form, and lack images. Its not really useful as an article if its not possible for someone to learn what technique is being referred to 184.88.148.166 (talk) 12:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images?
Talk:Ude hishigi sankaku gatame

message: The two articles Ude hishigi sankaku gatame and Ao muke gata ude hishigi, describe the same technique under different names. According to The Canon of Judo book this armlock is known as the former, while the Kodokan refer to it as the latter. I think this is grounds for a merger, especially since the Ude hishigi sankaku gatame article covers the other name for the technique; also this is my rational for merging into this article rather than vice versa.— Jdcollins13 (talk) 11:24, April 30, 2012
:There have been no objections so I am going ahead with the merger. — Jdcollins13 (talk) 14:32, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal
Talk:Deral Boykin

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 15:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Knee-on-stomach

message: This is almost if not already B class just needs a copy edit in my option. --Nate1481(talk/contribs) 09:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bulgarian Action Committees

message: The article is totally disconnected with reality.
:The Yugoslav rule was changed with German, after that with Bulgarian.
AKA Yugoslavia was occupied by Germany and Bulgaria.
:The Serbs in most places had run away, not be­ing afraid not as much of the Germans, but of the revenge of the local Bulgarian population.
Revenge for what?
:Only the Serbian authorities in Skopje and Bitola did not escape.
Escape from what?
:It was logical the Bulgarians to make an attempt to lake control and to avoid anarchy.
Says who?
:The establishment of that rule continued long after the arrival of the Bulgarian army because the organization of the administrative authorities in the re­gion and its transformation in inseparable unity with Bulgaria was long-lasting process.
Unseparable unity got separated four years later. Nikola 15:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it's inseparable ;). I'll try answering some of the questions, but for more info, we should get to the author who is not the most talkative of users in Wikipedia. 1st point 'The Yugoslav rule was changed with German, after that with Bulgarian.' I think it's worth mentioning the fact that the German rule came before the Bulgarian - the other way round is omitting this fact. 2nd - 'Revenge for what?' - the Macedonian issue. The whole reason Bulgaria participated in World War I was the fact that a huge part of the capital's population was in fact from Macedonia. This feelings were pretty much alive 20 years later. 3rd - I don't get it. The upper sentence says about this revenge, so it would be logic to assume that this is what they're running from (I'm sure for this part though). 4th I don't get it either. 5th It sounds a little unencyclopedic - ok a lot unencyclopedic. It's not part of the facts - I imagine he meant to put something about the desire of Bulgarians to unite. --Laveol 18:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 1) I'm not well versed in history of these areas, but I'll just say that I'm not so certain about that. 2) While would Serbian peasants be reponsible for the Macedonian issue? I also never heard about Sofia's population being mostly from Macedonia. Nikola 19:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

text:  I'm totally confident only over the last issue you mentioned - yes, Sofia's population consisted a huge number of immigrants from Macedonia. They formed a great public pressure on the Tsar and government. For the first issue I'm not sure about it - but as it was what the article imposed I thought it was worth mentioning as something fairly important. And about the peasants - I don't know if he meant peasants. It would make sense if government officials and so on ran way --Laveol 05:30, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Roads inspector (Jersey)

message: I wonder why this page is so incomplete? If "Richard Colgate" really wanted to provide a useful reference for Jersey Wikipedia users, he would have listed the Roads inspectors for every parish. It is clear, if one reads his other work on Wikipedia and has some background knowledge of the local political scene, that "Colgate" is an inside member of the Progress Jersey clique, as are some of St. Helier's Roads Inspectors. As they are the only ones getting a mention on the page, it rather looks as if this is just a little plug for them, contrary to Wikipedia policies. One for deletion?
Daverotherham 15:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Compression lock

message: the picture of this page doesnt show any kind of compression lock, which may confuse people researching it  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.103.97.25 (talk) 17:42, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Edeko

message: Besides being a stub, would someone with the appropriate skills translate this into English. Please. Io 15:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am sorry, I know I did'nt wrote it in very good Inglish. I will try it again with the little help of a dictionary--Anneboer 17:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try and help. Is this what you had in mind:
Edeko was for some time the chief of the Skirs. He was the father of Odoacer, who became magister militum in the Roman Army and king of Italy.
In the middle of the fitfh century the Skirs were a Germanic Tribe, vassals of the Huns and Edeko was a famous person at the court of Attila, in the same way Ardarik was, the king of the Gepids. According to written sources he kept Attila (under attack for the rest of his life?) (or protected Attila with his life?). In the battle of Chalons Edeko fought at the side of the Huns.
PS: The question marks are due to the fact that I can only read very simple texts in Dutch, and if Dutch is translated into nearly incomprehensible English, most must give up.
I hope this has helped. Don't let my criticism bother you. We all have to face them now and then. Alles Gute (yes I know, but it the closest I can get to Dutch). Io 18:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

text: PS Anneboer, you might consider setting up a User Page, so that discussions can take place there. Cheers Io 18:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Language

message: I suggest that the article Edeco (which was created recently) be merged into this article, Edeko, as this is the older article and they seem to be about the same subject. Patr2016 (talk) 03:29, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 12:49, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge
Talk:Claire Kincaid

message: The statements regarding whether Hennessy or Waterston were aware of the relationship, and the claim Hennessy declined to return need to be sourced or removed. I'm pretty certain the second statement is wrong as I recall Hennessy stating her desire to return to L&O for a guest appearance and her dismay that they killed Claire off. Doesn't sound like someone who wanted to never return.  68.146.8.46 15:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statements need sources 
Talk:Inland skimboarding

message: This should be merged with the more general "flatland" skimboarding article because it's the more generalized name for the sport.  Flatland skimboarding is often practiced on coastal waters at creek outlets.  Infamouse (talk) 00:20, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging this article with [[Flatland skimboarding]]
Talk:Zaar

message: I think this article probably is notable, but I can't find any references for it online so I won't remove the prod as it could be a hoax or mistake. If it gets deleted, the content is small enough that it could be added again later. However, if somebody could add to it now with references and statements of notability, that would be great. Rigadoun  (talk) 16:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I will redirect the article to :Zār. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 13:28, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod
Talk:Dead clade walking

message: Hi. A non-biologist here. Just wondering if this article should be linked to the extinction debt article via a see also section? Will let someone else decide, but the concepts seem related to me. Stuart mcmillen (talk) 05:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. I've added it. Danger High voltage! 09:55, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extinction Debt 

message: Just noting, in case enough other references exist to make it a viable section, that this theory's featured in tonight's episode of "Elementary" as a possible motive for murder.
Will come back to this later. :-)  JamesG5 (talk) 03:46, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Since someone else had the same thought I went ahead & added a cite.JamesG5 (talk) 04:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  pop culture 

message: Is this just another term for extinction debt? Is there a real distinction to make? If so, let's get it in this article. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:02, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonym for extinction debt
Talk:Busch Light Pole Award

message: "Affixing the decal to the car was optional, and was not specifically required on the respective the entry blank for the race. " Enigmamsg 17:03, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing sentence
Category talk:Potawatomi

message: In the Anishinaabe subproject of the Indigenous Peoples of North America project, we are currently re-organizing the entire Anishinaabe-related categories and articles.  We are asking for :Category:Potawatomi tribe be deleted, and in its place replace with this category, :Category:Potawatomi people and whole other subcategories of the :Category:Anishinaabe peoples.  The term "tribe" is not a favoured term since in Canada, the preferred term is "First Nation" and the Potawatomi are on both sides of that international boundary. CJLippert 16:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hang on
Talk:Bildschirmtext

message: Can someone add in a bit on the Chaos Computer Club's BTX hack? Orville Eastland (talk) 03:36, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: CCC's BTX hack?

message: Hi I was living in Germany "Pre-Internet" we had access to BBSes or Compuserve (good) and BTX.
BTX seemed to me to be diabolically frustrating to use and very difficult to access any useful information. I used  xBTX on my PC to access it (XBtx wass an X11 implementation of the CEPT videotext protocol terminal. It has been tested against the German Telekom's BTX version of the CEPT videotext service).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zzapper (talk • contribs) 09:44, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ease of Use 

message: The embedded image "Bildschirmtext logo.gif" should be scaled to the correct aspect ratio! (characters have to be higher then wide even if the native pixels haven't been squarish, i would try to pull the whole image to something like 4:3 ratio)...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.246.192.251 (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  corect scaling of logo
Talk:Comfort (fabric softener)

message: Phrases like "extra luxurious softness", "brought to life using the magic of..." are (IMNSHO) not NPOV nor phrased like an encyclopædia. In addition, I not sure that the long section on the "Clothworld" ad campaign is justified; such a high level of detail about a recent campaign is rather odd, particularly with no mention of previous campaigns. The section is also unreferenced. Stannered 16:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reading like an advertisement
Talk:Istaby Runestone

message: http://www.antalya-ws.com/futhark/FUTHP5E.HTM There is a different notion here. --78.181.12.243 (talk) 06:57, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: The word runestone is a composite of two words: rune and stone.  This article explains the runes, but says nothing about the stone.  What are the dimensions of the stone?  What type of stone is it made of?  (The type of stone probably mattered to the makers, so should certainly be included information.)  What does it weigh?  Where was it mined, on site or nearby or far away?  Without these things you should change the title of the article to Istaby Runes.  I have tried to find the information myself, but have been unsuccessful.  The museum's search function is currently broken and all other Internet articles about the stone seem to regurgitate the same information about the runes and say nothing of the stone.  FatBear1 (talk) 03:34, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  But what about the stone?
Talk:BrooWaha

message: The current BrooWaha site looks mostly or entirely made up of SEO spam content, and no real local news, which is the content focus described in the article. This article should be updated to reflect that the site is not what it once was, but I don't see any RS sources that cover the change.Dialectric (talk) 16:23, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Status (2021)
Talk:Brooks Pharmacy

message: There is no state or market called New England, so no need to treat the article as if there is one.  Each state is separate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.26.152 (talk) 22:38, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New England? 
Talk:List of Macalester College people

message: There were getting to be an awful lot of people on the Macalester College page so I created this to help divert that. This article, to be complete, needs to include descriptions and research of some of these people, and if anyone knows the class years of the alums and the time spent by faculty members at Mac, that would be fantastic. Cwilli201 16:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chery A5

message: I note with interest no mention of safety features or crashworthiness ratings (to go alongside the euro-4 emissions)....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.63.174.10 (talk) 11:32, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  hmm 
Talk:Maple Marindo

message: The car looks like older Mercedes sedans from the side.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.78.209.25 (talk) 10:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:BroadVoice

message: I tagged this as failed verification. I was looking for a web copy to ref tag the second paragraph, and I've found test section of the the listed issue of wired online here. I may be messing something up, but it doesn't appear to mention this company. If anyone knows the site well, a double-check would be good, since I've never worked with wired.com before. I checked the November section (here), and don't see any mention there. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 06:09, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot find anything claiming this Ernestvoice (talk) 15:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to remove that then. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 18:35, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wired citation
Talk:Bridie Gallagher

message: Just wondering if there is a more encyclopedic way of expressing this?  165.228.112.251 (talk) 01:44, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shot to fame?
Talk:Bridgewater High School, Warrington

message: The article was looking untidy and had several pieces of out of date or false information. Added new sub-headings, citation requirements and an example timetable. Removed yearbook info as no longer published. Updated staff numbers from 120+ to 220+ and removed several sports the school no longer competes in competitively. Added athletics as a competitive sport. NeilA92 (talk) 21:22, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes and general tidy up
Talk:Bridge House School

message: more? pics? Victuallers 17:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: stuff

message: I've just deleted a massive amount of unsourced WP:SCHOOLCRUFT.  This article read like a brochure for the school.  Please add material with reliable, third-party sources for citations.  Toddst1 (talk) 14:29, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:SCHOOLCRUFT]]
Talk:Cape white-eye

message: Hi Paul
I noticed you have been adding some nice images. Please note three minor points.
# The taxobox should always be in the top right hand corner
# Scientific names should be italicised
# Heading should follow this sequence, ie ==heading== is top level
Thanks
jimfbleak 16:53, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo v. taxobox

message: (No) Seeing that no-one has started a talk on the proposed split (Cape versus Orange River White-eyes), but just added the template to the article, I will add a comment on the issue. As noted in the article, the two groups interbreed where they come into contact. Unless someone can provide evidence for why we should split them, I will say no. • Rabo³ • 18:50, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article split
Talk:The Tenth City

message: I've removed some material that sounds very much like a blurb from the jacket flap of the novel, and actually contained no information, just excited phrases about exciting things that apparently happen in this novel.  I've looked at the publisher's site and it doesn't seem as if it was copyrighted, on first glance, but it certainly sounded "blurb-y".  It seems as though the publisher or the writer or someone connected with them is providing this information; I removed a big whack of copyrighted........ material from the base page of this trilogy.  Accounting4Taste 16:56, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:York County, Ontario

message: Just my opinion but I think it was premature to separate this article from York Region as this is just the history part of that article and I don't think it would be too much to simply include the history there. I just think it might be simpler to develop them together, at least until length really does justify a separate article. JosephIWMolto (talk) 09:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. York Region is a small part of what was once York County, and I think the two should remain separate. The history of York Region should focus on the region after the creation of the regional municipality (1971), with appropriate links to this (and other) articles for the period before that. (After all, York Region is what was left over once other jurisdictions were split off from it from the early 1800s to 1971. The fact that it retained the name York is irrelevant, I think. ) Mindmatrix 15:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The only reason you give against this is factually incorrect.  You say that York Region is only a small part of the former County of York, this is not true. York Region includes ALL of York County as it existed from 1954-1971, before 1954, like almost all Ontario Regions the County of York's boundaries changed several times.  York Region IS the Regional Municipality of York County raised in status (wasn't the City of Etobicoke the same as the Township of Etobicoke raised several levels of importance?).  If this is the argument then one article would have to be York County pre 1954 and another York County (post 1954) and York Region. JosephIWMolto (talk) 17:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

text: I just thought I should add that I'm not really concinvced it is a good idea to combine the articles, I just though it should be put out there.  What I was concerned about was that the articles should be clearly linked to each other (it took me a little while to find the link to this article) because York County and York Region ARE the same place, thats why I felt what was argued above was problematic. JosephIWMolto (talk) 18:06, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the articles should link to each other, and yes, I confused the dates for York County and York Region. However, I still think that including York County's history into the York Region article may not be appropriate, since it would thus require incorporating the history of Toronto, Peel, Halton, et el into the article for York Region, and I don't think that's the best choice here. If you limit the discussion to post-1954, then it's a more palatable consideration, but York County's history is far more expansive than that, and I don't think we should lose that by merging various bits of history about it to the articles about each new jurisdiction it spawned. Mindmatrix 14:23, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of York Region