Talk:HTTP pipelining

message: Hi, all modern browsers are listed. But what is with Safari? -- cu AssetBurned (talk) 15:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safari and popelining? 

message: A quick search of RFC 2068 for pipeline finds no hits. Plugwash 01:44, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: sorry my mistake the copy of the RFC I was looking at was split into sections causing my search to not find stuff that was in fact in the RFC. Plugwash  —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 01:47, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is this actually defined?

message: Is it just me, or saying that Konqueror supports it but needs to be "enabled" is like saying that firefox supports tor and just needs to be enabled?
The "trick" listed in the page () makes you use an external software (a proxy) that implements pipelining...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flameeyes (talk • contribs) 16:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  That pipeline "support" involves using a 3rd party web proxy (Polipo), clearly that's not the same thing as the browser actually having in-built support for pipelining.  I'd edit it myself but I don't have any references to whether Konqueror actually supports pipelining or not.  Maybe if someone actually has a reference they can do the edit.. PUnkX22 (talk) 17:10, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Konqueror support can be "enabled"? 

message: I don't see any indication that lftp supports HTTP pipelining; the man page only mentions FTP pipelining. Pimlottc (talk) 13:43, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LFTP support 

message: Link for Firefox FAQ rotted! Pls halp! Kingsocarso (talk) 16:57, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Rot! 

message: This is incredibly outdated, please include all modern browsers. Leica0000 (talk) 09:11, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Internet Explorer 9 & 10 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on HTTP pipelining. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091222054207/http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.6/qnetworkrequest.html to http://doc.qt.nokia.com/4.6/qnetworkrequest.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120627181619/http://curl.haxx.se/dev/readme-pipelining.html to http://curl.haxx.se/dev/readme-pipelining.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello. The image in the article clearly is incorrect. The pipelining in HTTP/1.1 only allows the second request after the first request is finished. Initiating multiple requests at once can either be done through multiple (TCP) connections, through HTTP/2 multiplexing (with HOL-blocking), or through HTTP/3 multiplexing (over QUIC). As "HTTP pipelining" as it is described in the article is barely if at all used anymore, and "HTTP multiplexing" is now with QUIC used even more, I think this article should be renamed to HTTP pipelining. Then we can properly seperate:
* multiple (TCP) connections (multiplexing)
* HTTP/1.1 pipelining (pipelining)
* HTTP/2 multiplexing (multiplexing)
* HTTP/3 over QUIC (multiplexing)
--BlauerBaum (talk) 22:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  pipelining vs multiplexing