Talk:RSS (disambiguation)

message: I don't see how RSS can possibly mean "Atom." That's like saying that Windows might mean Macintosh. Jsnell 00:36, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The link to Atom was originally included in a break-down of the different file formats referred to as "RSS". I personally think that break-down should be reinstated, so as not to "disambiguate" to just another disambiguation list, but in the meantime I've fixed the reference to Atom to make sense in the current context. - IMSoP 12:53, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atom 

message: I have changed the refence from "an extreme right wing..." to "a right wing...", because the earlier statement was POV. --Andy123 11:51, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2831337.stm 
Evox777 (talk) 17:56, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh 

message: I've suggested a couple of times that there should be an entry to the networking interpretation of RSS. RSS is important to disambiguate because a simple Google search result in more than 2 billion hits. 
RSS is a new technology buzzword in high performance networking. The best and most concise explanation of network RSS I know is on the Microsoft site (they standardized the process). A Wikipedia article on the subject would be basically saying the same thing, (though could add more detail such as history, but I don't know it), hence, I posted a link. It's just as important as many of the 802.3 minor standards.
Drdr6 (talk) 18:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Receive Side Scaling 

message: This is not an official start of a primary topic discussion, but perhaps in lieu of one I thought I'd share the page view comparison of RSS and Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, which is actually quite interesting: . The political party has been quite steady in the 50k to 100k monthly range for years, with a  uptick in recent months. RSS has sometimes been in that same range, but for the past year was consistently above 500k, and then a couple months ago suddenly plummeted 90% to 50k. Seems really hard to predict where those are going to go. My 2 cents: a solid argument could be made for there being no primary topic, but I think there's virtually no chance of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh becoming primary, even with long-term significance taken into account. -- Fyrael (talk) 15:26, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree there is no primary topic - the maths one also gets high views. I don't agree your analysis, btw, the Indian paramilitary group (not a party) sees huge spikes when they are in the news at the daily/weekly level. RSS should be moved, & the plain term go here. The RSS graph is certainly rather odd.  Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh is btw, as one might expect, almost invariably referred to just as "RSS" in the Indian media, as "NATO" is in the West.  Johnbod (talk) 16:27, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

text: I agree that there is no longer a clear primary topic – the popularity of and support for RSS web feeds has declined enormously since the page was created in 2002, as RSS#Current_usage details. I'd suggest moving RSS (disambiguation) to RSS, and RSS to RSS (web feed). The former would require an admin, I think. Qwfp (talk) 19:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, ok, I wasn't really providing analysis so much as just describing what's on the graph in case someone else came along and didn't bother to click the link. At any rate, I would probably be WP:BOLD and move the DAB page to the base name, but I think there will be technical restrictions so I have to make a request, which will likely result in a move discussion anyway. I guess we'll see. -- Fyrael (talk) 19:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

text: Oops, I hadn't noticed Qwfp's response before mine. -- Fyrael (talk) 19:35, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Also the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, as part father-movement to the BJP, has no doubt got much higher views since Modi came to power. Johnbod (talk) 20:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary topic