Category talk:American films

message: This category is really very unpopulated. I suppose 1/10 of the American films on Wikipedia is here. This should be populated like :Category:American actors. - Darwinek 13:39, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume you're counting all the subcats as well?  Doesn't matter much to me - I'm just going through removing very outdated popcat tags.  I'll leave this alone...  —Wknight94 (talk) 14:57, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Perhaps, then, there should be more subcategories? (There is only one at this time). Marasmusine 21:33, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is it that makes a film an "American film"? Does it have American actors, American writers, an American director, is it filmed in America, or is it a combination of the above? As it stands, this category is ill-defined. Martin 09:00, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: An American film?

message: What about Category:American films by genre? --Ezzex (talk) 15:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:American films

message: Why doesn't this category exist? —Codrdan (talk) 05:28, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:American Western films]]

message: Is there some good reason why an American film article should state both parent and sub-categories to which that film belongs? The particular manifestation is Schindler's List, which is listed in 'American biographical films', 'American epic films' and 'American war films', so there is no possibility of the reader not realising that this is part of:Category:American films. Text at the head of the category page says 'For convenience, all American films are included in this category. This includes all American films that can also be found in the subcategories.' Is the same thing as the parent category must be SHOWN on ALL American film articles, or is this listing achieved in the background?
A discussion has taken place on my talk page here:. Clarification would be helpful, I've tried checking Wikipedia:FAQ/Categorization and elsewhere but nothing seems to answer the question. It is in order to prevent 'categorization bloat', and because the parent category in this instance is so huge as to be unhelpful to the reader, that I ask the question. Hoping that someone is watching this page. Pincrete (talk) 12:25, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: My question has been answered elsewhere, YES films should be in both parent and sub.Pincrete (talk) 08:14, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

text: *  Then what is the answer? Marcocapelle (talk) 17:55, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  apparently, the answer is 'yes', even if already listed as an American Epic/thriller etc. (or any other sub), the film must be listed as 'US film'. I forget the exact logic behind this ruling, but it MAY have been partly because 'US biographical' (or some others that start 'US') are actually subs of 'biographical',(logical ruling). I forget the rest of the logic, which seemed a bit bizarre to me. Pincrete (talk) 19:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

text: I would also suggest pinging  - he and I have had a number of discussions over the years regarding a variety of film categories. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 23:46, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

text: This parent category has the template "For convenience, all American films should be included in this category. This includes all films that can also be found in the subcategories."  American biographical films is a sub-cat of American films by genre and Biographical films by country, so not directly in the category of American films. WP:FILMCAT has been used for at least as long as I've been on WP (14 years+), and has this regarding the top-level county categories. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:13, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Interesting.  I was not aware of this.  Thanks for explaining.  — Mudwater (Talk) 01:25, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:14, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should an American film article be listed in both parent and sub-categories ?  

message: Please see here where consensus determined it was not needed after all to redundantly categorize films here, and that the basis for doing so like we did for many years was not sound. Consensus has changed and it's been determined we probably should not have done this to begin with. If anything should remain here and does not seem suitable for any subcategories, that can be determined on a case-by-case basis. In the meantime I will tag this as a WP:CONTAINER, barring any objections. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 15:27, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, someone already did it. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 15:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category now (mostly) empty