lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nevile Henderson

message: ::Copied from WP:RD/H for further processing. --Ghirla-трёп- 14:23, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: i added an infobox, i didnt kno how to make one, so i just lifted it from the neville chamberlain article and modifed the headings to mak them apply to nevile henderson  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123465421jhytwretpo98721654 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work. The dating ot the ending of the commission as ambassador seems a bit strange, though. At least it ought to be mentioned in the text if/that he was recalled by the foreign office at the outbreak of the war and held his position from London up until 10 May 1940. The succession would have to be clarified as well. As I see it in other texts, the successor was installed only in 1949.--Paracel63 (talk) 20:49, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox 

message: The last edit I think is vandalism but I won’t edit anything because I am not sure AngelGamesW (talk) 22:42, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Mikhail Yangel

message: One could say "cigarettes saved his life." :) -xwingsx- (talk) 04:13, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm. 
Talk:Miklós Radnóti

message: I swapped two categories. The one I took out is being deleted. The other seems more appropriate. I hope this works for everyone.--Abie the Fish Peddler (talk) 04:52, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 
Talk:Miklós Szabados

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 22:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Miles Benjamin McSweeney

message: Article probably needs to explain to non-native South Carolinians and others not-well versed in the history of the state that this was a scheme to distribute lawfully alcoholic beverages.  73.88.162.151 (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Dispensary" 
Talk:Jacques-Cartier River

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as it provides a fair amount of detail and organization, but lacks in-line citations and proper referencing.  I have assessed this as low importance, as I do not feel that many people outside of Canada would be familiar with the topic of the article although, if it actually became a heritage site, it might be worth it to bump it up to mid-importance. Cheers, CP 05:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Jacques-Cartier—Lasalle

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, and of low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 05:32, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to stub class today.  The article has a bunch of data (election results) but only 3 sentences.  A description of the riding's boundaries and/or characteristics would be helpful.  PKT(alk) 12:49, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:History of the Big Dig

message: * The article states that Parts of the planned I-695 right of way remain unused and under consideration for future mass transit projects.  Question:  What parts?  I know that there are marshes north of the city that were included in right-of-way that never were developed, but that wasn't the inner belt.  Same with the nature reservation at the I-93/I-95 interchange southwest of the city.  But the beltway was heavily developed anyway.  What parts of the inner beltway ROW remain undeveloped?   My guess: none. --Drtillberg 16:03, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I-695 Right of Way

message: This article needs a map. It is hard to understand the descriptions if unfamiliar with the city/conurbation. Artlondon (talk) 20:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  map needed
Talk:Millard Mitchell

message: In the Infobox it states that Mitchell had 2 children; yet in the article it states that Mitchell and his wife only had one child. Which is it? 2600:8800:785:2A00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 01:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of children
Talk:Millicent Hearst

message: '...and the twins, Randolph Apperson Hearst and David Whitmire (née Elbert Willson) Hearst, born on December 2, 1915.'
:Rather an odd entry. It sounds as though David changed his own name? Could we have some enlightenment? Valetude (talk) 13:09, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of name?
Talk:Milo Hastings

message: I tagged this article for checking as a possible hoax.  (If it is, it's a damned good one.)  The link to the supposed Supreme Court case is broken.  A google search for "Weeniwinks" brings forth only Wikipedia mirrors, and an about.com page  that seems to depict a test tube full of corn kernels.  The pictures are cute. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:14, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the tag; at least the patent page checks out, and he does seem to be an author listed on amazon.com.  I still have doubts, though. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:20, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Fixed the broken link - D. C. Plunkett 03:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Hoax?  Hardly.  All the works of Hastings cited and articles about Hastings cited are available for verification.  Not cited are a death certificate from Westchester County NY, grave marker at Pardee Cemetery KS, United States census entries, college transcript from Kansas State University, a multitude of newspaper clippings about Hastings, and a multitude of magazine articles by Hastings. It is dismaying that a broken link (now fixed) to a fully-cited Supreme Court decision caused an article to be tagged as a hoax.  --RogerTaft 00:11, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax? 
Talk:Milos Milos

message: This article needs verifiable, specific references in the English language. Rstandefer 16:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:VERIFY#Sources_in_languages_other_than_English. Rstandefer 18:25, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in this article
Talk:Teratohyla midas

message: — Assignment last updated by CalJS (talk) 01:21, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried focusing on editing the writing of the paper in order to make it flow better. There were also small typos I fixed (such as half of a date written in the intro section). I also added sub-headers formatted to mimic the outline given to our class, such as changing “Camouflage Properties of T. Midas” to “Physiology” and making “Camouflage Properties” a sub-header. Furthermore, I rearranged the order of these sections to make the sections transition into one another better. I also think there are a few places where the citation is needed (as stated in the brackets), which should be either updated or that information should be deleted. Carolinaalisio (talk) 02:33, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022

message: The main changes I made to this article was going though and fixing many grammar and spelling mistakes. I also reworded and rephrased many parts to make them flow better. I also changed the name of the “Description” section to “Characteristics” because this section only focused on the physical attributes of the frog, and not any other sort of description.  Also, later in the article they start referring tot he frog as a “glass frog”, but the term or species “glass frog” was never mentioned or introduced in the article. I added a bit of information about how th Teratohyla midas is part of the family Centrolenidae, which are also known as glass frogs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C40:200:1E1:D486:741B:DC06:9826 (talk) 01:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Behavioral Ecology Peer Review
Talk:Giant Wheel (Hersheypark)

message: Anyone know why the Giant Wheel was removed - was it just to build the coaster? This was one of Hershey's "trademark" rides and I was shocked to find it gone when I visited the park a couple years ago. HanokOdbrook 16:07, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The lack of available parts was the major reason for removal.  They had been looking into removing it for several years before the coaster concept came into fruition - and then promptly collapsed.  --Son (talk) 04:19, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: , can you please provide the sources which you know to exist which indicate notability for this topic? Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:15, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Mina P. Shaughnessy

message: This article has some major problems. It was contributed essentially at onetime by a single editor, and is apparently based closely on a single book, Jane Maher, "Mina P. Shaughnessy: Her Life and Work",This needs checking to see the degree to which this is close paraphrase or even a copyvio. In any case, the tone is more like an essay than an encyclopedia  article, drawing conclusions rather than reporting information, not presenting any critical analysis of her work, and there is greatly excessive emphasis on her private life.  If a copyvio, it must be stubbified or rewritten; in any case, considerable editing is needed. As she is highly notable, the bio can not be left in this state; if nobody responds, I shall deal with it.    DGG ( talk ) 09:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: problems
Talk:LPMud

message: I've made some userboxes for LPC coders and LPmud admins. Chaos5023 16:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ... and have recently updated them to be considerably more appealing. —chaos5023 (talk) 04:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Userboxes

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :NannyMUD. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 22#NannyMUD until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  czar 07:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "NannyMUD" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Minnie Marx

message: There is a foto of the Marx family in the article of Minnie Marx; could someone specify who is who in that picture? I can not identify Groucho, probably because he was so young there. 2A02:8388:1604:CA80:0:0:0:5 (talk) 23:10, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foto
Talk:Minnie Paterson

message: The article title has a double 'tt' but the article content has a single 't'.  Which is it?   Eno Lirpa (talk) 16:00, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just moved the article to single t as the refs support this. Tacyarg (talk) 20:38, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Patt/terson ?
Talk:Mireille Hartuch

message: This page could do with a lot of improvement -a listing of her most famous songs would be a good start --Tumadoireacht (talk) 18:29, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Miriam Leslie

message: I was looking through recent edits, and IP:69.121.165.149 says that she was born 1836, not 1828.  Is this true? 
:O—— The Unknown Hitchhiker 15:27, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A woman of the century (see references) gives her birthdate as 1851!  Find a grave gives the 1836 date.  The 1828 date comes from NIE (1915).  Appletons' (1900) doesn't even hazard a guess. I think I will change it to 1836. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 21:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Birth
Talk:Powdered glass frog

message: There must be an error in authorship and date (Wilhelm Peters,1873). It is more likely that the author was James A. Peters, 1973. The latter studied amphibians of Ecuador unlike Wilhelm, who was never there.
--Polinizador (talk) 14:25, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, according to the Amphibian Species of the World 6.0 the original reference is "Peters, W. C. H. 1873. Über eine neue Schildrötenart, Cinosternon Effeldtii und einige andere neue oder weniger bekannte Amphibien. Monatsberichte der Königlichen Preussische Akademie des Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1873: 603–618". Micromesistius (talk) 21:16, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Marine transgression

message: This article says that transgression is the opposite of regression, yet there is no article on that.  Sumbuddy should write a stub on regression (geology) and link it at regression (which is where I found this article).   Randall Bart    Talk   18:28, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree with merge. A marine transgression is caused by sea level rise (generally isostatic) but it is not the same thing as sea level rise. It implies an advancing coastline,  and an advancing series of depositional environments, which is not the same as the water just getting deeper, though obviously it is a consequence of this. The sea level rise article is and should be about causes and short-run effects of sea level rise, global warming, human impact etc. This article should be about the geological record left by marine transgressions. Ditto the matching article about regression. If you want to cut down the number of articles, merge the two geology ones, not the general one on sea level.Pterre (talk) 23:50, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oops - of course I mean a retreating coastline - coastal erosion etc. Pterre (talk) 12:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Diasgree. Transgressions often occur in the geological record due to local tectonic effects, e.g. as areas subside during rifting, and these have nothing to do necessarily with global sea level changes. Mikenorton (talk) 16:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mergeto Sea level rise
Talk:Aksa (company)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 19:46, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Aksa (company) →  – It took me a while to realise there was an article about this company. The mosque is spelt differently in English. Chidgk1 (talk) 13:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Turkey and WikiProject Companies have been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 13:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 April 2024
Talk:Suhitpangphaa

message: Isn't this page too long and unmodified? Same with the page of Lakshmi Singha which provides exceptional details. The use of Primary sources is also excessive starting from the page of Kamaleswar Singha, same can be noticed in the page of Pramatta Singha and many more multiple pages. Is it fine to let it sit down there or something should be done? ComparingQuantities (talk) 03:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging two most active editors on Assam related history pages, @Chaipau and @Safe haven123 ComparingQuantities (talk) 13:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too long
Talk:Mirza Hadi Ruswa

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.ca/books?id=9e5LeQa3b5sC. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:12, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Mischa Mischakoff

message: No doubt he was very fine, but starting off an encyclopedia article with "...was an outstanding violinist" sounds more like a fan remembrance than a neutral article. It should be replaced with simply "violinist" or if you must have an adjective, "well-known," or something of that sort. 2601:643:8D00:970:B94E:E0CF:7AE1:3F6F (talk) 01:38, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  An "outstanding" violinist?
Talk:Mitrofan Belyayev

message: In my view one could use publications by Alexander Ossovsky as reliable biography sources. He was a renowned musicologist and a friend of Belyaev. Semimartingale (talk) 01:16, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  About sources for Mitrofan Belyayev biography 
Talk:Brditschka HB-3

message: I object mightily companies hi-jacking aircraft that they never produced: a classic is the"boeing F-4 phantomII" complete drivel!!!
I am going to revert this to Brditschks HB-3Petebutt (talk) 06:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: * Article says "has two seats in tandem" but photograph seems to show side-by-side seating. Is photograph deceptive?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.20.120 (talk) 19:02, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: HB-3 tandem, later marques side by side!--Petebutt (talk) 13:20, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tandem
Talk:Moe Dalitz

message: I think it's not good for an encyclopedia to have listed as bootlegger and racketeer his occupations. Those need to be corrected and other factual information should be presented as well. 
--Lobbynoise (talk) 17:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected in what way? Dalitz, himself, admitted he was a bootlegger to the Kefauver Committee. Not including this information is censorship. Removing "bad" factual information but leaving "good" factual information is taking sides. How does one decides what is good or bad; what to include and what to leave out if one does not take a particular side? Whatever your opinion of a person, Wikipedia articles should be neutral and present the bad along side the good. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 04:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupation 

message: Dalitz's history of criminal activity in the 20s-40s as part of US organized crime, as documented by the article prior to my recent edit, defines him as a gangster, conviction(s) or not. Further, his own daughter describes him as such in a 2014 self-penned article. Nuff said--Dalitz was, at least in early to mid-life, a gangster. Tapered (talk) 11:32, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gangster 

message: Is there some special reason why Dalitz' affiliation with the Purple Gang has been excluded from this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C50:6180:3342:187E:B36A:F833:3370 (talk) 02:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reliable source for that information? - Cameron Dewe (talk) 04:13, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purple Gang
Talk:Mohamed Amin

message: I just stumbled over this article, and this section seems to be written in a highly un-encyclopedic stile; I am not even sure what it means to say. Maybe someone who is knowledgeable about the topic and experienced in editing can improve that, I am neither.
95.89.205.170 (talk) 21:35, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section "Black September" 
Talk:Moishe Oysher

message: This article states that Oysher's name is spelled משה אוישר in Yiddish, however, the Yiddish Wikipedia spells his name משה אוישער. Which is correct? Kaldari (talk) 00:35, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yiddish spelling 

message: I notice a lot of the text of this article is similar to passages in the book Bridge of Light: Yiddish Film Between Two Worlds By J. Hoberman. It's possibly someone had this book open while writing an earlier version of this article, and yet it is not cited. I can only see snippets of it through Google books but if I manage to see a print copy in a library I will try to properly cite the sources of the statements. --Dan Carkner (talk) 17:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly plagiarism in earlier draft of this article
Talk:4.5-inch Mark 8 naval gun

message: First paragraph
I really find that paragraph totally confusing. The gun was standard since 1938, but designed in 1960 later in the page. WTF  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.237.81.195 (talk) 02:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The 4.5 gun as a specific calibre originated in 1938. There are many different versions of any gun. This article is about the Mark 8 version of the gun, which originates from the 1960s. Rcbutcher (talk) 20:45, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The reference from Janes Ammunition Handbook 1999-2000 :
 Rcbutcher (talk) 20:52, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The actual bore is 4.45 inches (113 mm) : read this 

message: Article needs to say something about ammunition, eg was it a totally new round, could it fire the ammo used in the older guns, obviously it had an electrical primer.  IIRC the prox fze was N97 but subsequently L116 and perhaps now L166 or something.  Were DA fuzes available (eg Vickers L32?).  Was fuze setting done at the breach or below - or was N97 simple VT not CVT?  If it was VT then there may have been a gun mod for L116 and its FSE (and perhaps another for new induction fuzes), unless the AA role of the gun has been totally abandoned.Nfe (talk) 04:15, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ammunition

message: In which elevations can the gun been trained?--109.91.78.75 (talk) 01:20, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elevation 

message: There's update beyond the line on traisl to begin in 2009. Perhaps this 155mm version has been cancelled?Cibwins2885 (talk) 20:12, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  155mm variant 

message: What is the parabolic antenna posed over some of the Mk 8 turret guns? Was it a FCS radar? 62.11.0.22 (talk) 14:40, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: About the mount

message: https://des.mod.uk/mk-8-navy-gun-trials/?portfolioCats=69%2C735%2C290%2C734%2C726
Sammartinlai (talk) 04:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sustainment
Talk:Mollie Monroe

message: This article does not discuss her involvement in any actual war. Why is she in warfare categories?
Getting into fights and occasional dalliances with the military do not seem enough in my mind to count her as a woman in warfare  or a wartime crossdresser.--ZayZayEM (talk) 02:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Category removed.  – S. Rich (talk) 23:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  War?