lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Inferior Five

message: Have these characters ever been named in a comic book, or is the name of the group something fans created on the internet, or only given by Gail Simone in some internet interview?? I can find no comic book where they are called the Superior Five!76.189.112.51 (talk) 19:47, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Superior Five

message: Should we add her marriage to Ambush bug?129.139.1.68 (talk) 19:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dumb Bunny
Talk:Angel and the Ape

message: How is there a talking gorilla in a detective agency, anyway? Anything in the series to say? 2601:647:5800:3B60:4462:E45D:493C:359 (talk) 05:39, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin

message: The below was inserted in the article by user 72.165.85.178 on Feb 9 2009, it belongs in the discussion page. Fitfatfighter (talk) 05:28, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved from article
Talk:Challengers of the Unknown

message: This article could be a lot more clear. The publication history could use merging with the fictional character biography. The individual characters could use highlighting, they have had unique moments. Like when Rocky went on a self-smartening trip in the Tim Sale series just to use one of many examples. Lots42 (talk) 09:52, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clear? 

message: I suggest a picture showcasing the Challengers more then some crazy space aliens. Lots42 (talk) 10:31, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current 'feature' picture 

message: There is really no need for Challengers of the Unknown (alternate series). That article has sufficiently short content that it can be incorporated here, particularly once all the redundancies with the team’s fictional and publication histories are removed (read this start to finish and you will come across identical information repeatedly). ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:54, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and restructure
Talk:Ross Dependency

message: This user supports New Zealand Sovereignty over Ross Dependency	
:I really question whether this template is appropriate for the talk page of an article. John Carter 18:26, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right. I did it William M. Connolley 14:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template (for those who supports New Zealand's juristiction over the territory)

message: I am not aware that a capital has ever been designated for an Antarctic territory, yet according to this entry, Scott Base is the capital of Ross Dependency.  If there are no objections, I will delete this factually unsupported entry. --Mike Beidler 12:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right. I did it William M. Connolley 14:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ross Dependency Has a Capital?

message: This may be tricky. I don't know of any published reports of the flag, but a friend of mine who worked at Scott Base for a season did take a flag down to the Big Ice with him and said that he flew it. It certainly has no official status and AFAIK has never been officially flown there. Grutness...wha? 00:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation for flag

message: No piece of Antarctica belongs to any country. Like all the other Antarctic territorial claims, this entry should state in the introductory language that it is a claim. The language should be in line with the British Antarctic Territory or the Argentine Antarctica.  Esquierman (talk) 15:52, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article should reflect reliable sources, not your personal point of view. However, I've reworded it to mention the effect of the Antarctic Treaty on NZ's claim. Our articles on various Antarctic territorial claims do not all treat this the same way, so arguing from example doesn't necessarily lead anywhere; see Adélie Land, for instance. --Avenue (talk) 23:05, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  The new wording is better. I agree that "belongs to" was wrong William M. Connolley (talk) 08:07, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  No problem either from my perspective. Justin talk 09:12, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Belongs to New Zealand"? 
Talk:Design and Technology

message: ==== Written Coursework For GCSE: ====
*1.   Design Brief
*2    Task Analysis
*3.   Function
*4.   Market Research
*5.   Specifications
*6.   New Order Specification (in order of importance)
*7.   Ideas (10 ideas)
*8.   Evaluation Of Ideas
*9.   Development Of Idea (including construction points, e.g., joints)
*10.  Plan Of Manufacture
*11.  Progress Diary
*12.  Evaluation Of Product
Not encyclopedic in my view. Inner Earth 11:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from main article 

message: *1.   Design Brief
*2    Task Analysis
*3.   Function
*4.   Market Research
*5.   Specifications
*6.   New Order Specification (in order of importance)
*7.   Ideas (10 ideas)
*8.   Evaluation Of Ideas
*9.   Development Of Idea (including construction points, e.g., joints)
*10.  Plan Of Manufacture
*11.  Progress Diary
*12.  Evaluation Of Product
Not encyclopedic in my view. Inner Earth 11:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written Coursework For GCSE: 

message: 1.Image board
 2.Definition
 3.General Analysis
 4.Problem Situations
 5.Design Brief
 6.Further Analysis
 7.Design Specification
 8.Exploration of Ideas
 9.Detailed Development
 10.Manufacturing Plan
Hove 12:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written coursework for GCE O level 

message: I propose we merge Design_technology into this article's IBDT section. -Wizzard2k 22:52, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Technology 197.188.51.105 (talk) 18:28, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Design and Technology
Talk:Special Court for Sierra Leone

message: A low res. version of the court's logo can be found in the press releases on www.sc-sl.org. – Ilse@ 21:46, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: The article needs to be updated. For example, the section on Charles Taylor says that the defense is scheduled to start in June 2009. It is almost January 2011, so that section is almost 1 1/2 years outdated. 74.34.5.38 (talk) 16:02, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles Taylor 

message: Sentence that was typed about Koroma's alleged death did not state the claim was confirmed, but that people believed it was true.  This sentence has merit and should be included, because they could eventually either find his body or drop him as a fugitive if they find enough to be convinced he was murdered.  The prosecution have been trying Charles Taylor for this alleged murder too.JoetheMoe25 (talk) 14:55, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Johnny Paul Koroma

message: This removes content from IP editors as per the edit summary. Academic and RS reactions are notable (which was TWICE removed by the IP because he doesnt seem to like the outcome per IDONTLIKEIT) on the basis that "There is no consensus that the Western World has unduely persued "justice" through the Taylor case. Hence, I have removed the comment n=making this claim - attributed to Christine Cheng (Dr Howard SCOTT" however this was cited AS the op-ed not fact and not sure what "howard SCOTT" means? + the flag for the judges is based on the SCSL page that lists Teresa as being from northern island. The edit summary "NI not sovereign UK is sovereign and UN member" clearly explains the editor dint bother to read the source + words were added by the IP that were not in the quote, again showing he dint bother to read the source to add his own words.(Lihaas (talk) 23:46, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: IP removals
Talk:Luckey, Ohio

message: Photographs would add some character.  Few have actually seen Luckey, Ohio, although many who have traveled along I-75 have seen the sign at the State Route 582 exit that says "Luckey 8 miles."  The other claim to fame is that the town was once the home of the Goodyear tire plant; this prompted the name of the town bar, "The Blimphanger."
````  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clmatyi1 (talk • contribs) 15:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Julie Miller

message: Should probably be mentioned somewhere that she was a Contemporary Christian artist for a large portion of her career, especially during the Nineties. I think going into country/folk music has been a fairly recent thing for her.
:Please sign with the four tildes ~~~~ your comments and if you know what to say - be bold and make the changes. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:40, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Don't conform! Never bow at the alter of the four tildes! Until Wikipedia creates a real identity checking system... what does it matter?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.161.131.76 (talk • contribs).
The Demo tape that is listed in this article was my copy and the notes (Synth pop version, etc) are my own. The tape was 11 songs long, not 8, 3 of them were unlisted. I still have MP3's of this demo tape if there is question as to what was or wasn't on it. Sign me Wayne "JulieMillerFan" Shuman --- largest dealer of Christian Music on Ebay for 9 straight years (1999 - 2008). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.12.193.99 (talk) 14:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Paraburdoo, Western Australia

message: I have added a photo taken from the air - it is quite poor but may fall into the category "better than none". Feel free to replace it. IanBailey (talk) 09:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Its not so much the quality - it has no text with it - what direction from- would be better than blank in the article SatuSuro 07:45, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

text: No worries. Arranging images is difficult when there's not much text. You just can't win. If you want them arranged differently, let me know and I'll have a go. Hesperian 05:24, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The photos look fine, unless we get more, and then I'd opt for a gallery.  I have a friend who was born in Paraburdoo just over thirty years ago.  Her parents, a mining engineer and nurse, met and married there.  They all live in Tasmania now and I'll see if any of them want to add to this article.KeresH 05:34, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:AMC (TV channel)

message: AMC has changed his YouTube channel to "The Walking Dead". This is an important piece of information.--89.246.121.48 (talk) 0bjb0:16, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Walking Dead 

message: Will there be a page on AMC+ soon? Lonniemitchell22 (talk) 18:50, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMC+ 

message: This is a notice that there is a draft for Pantheon (TV series) at Draft:Pantheon (TV series) until such a time that it is ready for inclusion in the mainspace. All are welcome to come help nurture the article's development there. — YoungForever(talk)  17:11, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft article for Pantheon (TV series) 

message: mir colah 45.116.232.36 (talk) 18:31, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mir aslam 

message: m 45.116.232.36 (talk) 18:31, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mir aslam 

message: Why do you insist on not playing movies in the order for instants karate kid karate kid two and someone know you play karate kid two then the karate kid.   Back to the future three back to the future then back to the future part two why can’t you play them in order 2600:6C54:4600:6602:8483:15E7:3430:5E9 (talk) 01:07, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movies and the sequels
Talk:Equivariant cohomology

message: Why is this page in the symplectic topology category? Dave Rosoff 22:40, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. (That was silly of me.) Dave Rosoff 00:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

text: The right way to think about it is really dependent on what you are using it for. I prefer the "twisted de Rham operator" view for my research, you prefer the G-CW-complexes view, and other people prefer the view here. Right way or not, this is the way it is introduced in most textbooks/lecture notes. Bredon is mostly talking about finite groups anyway in this lecture notes.131.211.241.54 (talk) 13:34, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Trassenheide

message: What about the camp here? Stumbled upon that in the Peenemunde article. 46.138.82.223 (talk) 07:05, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concentration camp in WWII 
Talk:Watersheds of Illinois

message: I suppose this is none of my concern, but is there any way that you two could work this list completeness/incompleteness issue out on the talk page instead of reverting each other numerous times? See also WP:3RR. I would think that you both could list your arguments for complete/incomplete here and possibly come to an agreement or some kind of understanding. I would ask, what is the source material that indicates that the list is complete? If the list is incomplete, is there an example of what is missing? How much more detail does the list need beyond the current list?  --Dual Freq 20:45, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose the list appears to be complete based upon the criteria of the Major watershed map cited on the front page. Is it incomplete because it doesn't list smaller rivers and streams in each major watershed? --Dual Freq 20:56, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

text: If you want this to be a list of "official watersheds" then you need to label this as such and provide an authority for it. To claim that it is complete while it is only a sub-set of the List of Illinois rivers is not correct. See the second half of List of Michigan rivers for an example of a "complete" list (at least to the level of named river). Rmhermen 01:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you proposing a merger with List of Illinois rivers? List of Minnesota rivers is similar to Michigan's list not stating watershed, but sorting By Basin and Tributary. --Dual Freq 02:00, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Completeness of list

message: I think that you ought to consider gleaning watershed facts from each Illinois waterbody article you've hyperlinked and put those facts on this page. The Ohio River article, for example, has a discussion of watersheds in its geology section, as well as a whole drainage basin section which could be absorbed into your article or a sub-article. You can create text discussing each watershed and sub-watershed from the perspective of them being drainage basins, with all of the associated pollution issues, etc, that go along with them. It would seem Wikilogical to minimize the details of watersheds and drainage basins in waterbody articles and maximize it in watershed articles, if we're going to have watershed and basin articles, that is. (And I think we should) There's no use having the latter if we don't add some new dimension to them over the current waterbody articles.
See if you get some ideas from Lake Erie Watershed (Pennsylvania) and Lake Erie Basin, which I put together fairly recently. They are still in the early stages and much remains to be done, but you can get the idea of how unique watershed information (and photographs) can be distinguished from information belonging to waterbody articles. Note in particular the discussion of Erie International Airport's de-icing mitigation requirements in order to operate near Lake Erie. Information such as that rarely makes it into waterbody articles. --Pat (talk) 12:43, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinctiveness of watershed article vs waterbody article
Talk:Charm

message: "Charm, a number of socially desirable characteristics, from courtesy and wit to sexiness and charisma" is just not good enough. There needs to be a specific page on charm as a personality characteristic. This would also include "superficial charm". Very unpleasant people such as psychopaths can have charm.--Penbat 19:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Charm hit the heights of popularity in America following World War II. American soldiers returned home with memento charms from the cities they had liberated which were designed by Native craftsmen out of tiny bits of metal into little replicas of items common to the locale. Jewelers in the states soon added charms of various alloys, variations, and events to their lines.
In lots of families, it grew to become customary for young female to be presented a beginner bracelet as she neared age of 13. She would certainly then be periodically given additional charms to recognize significant occasions, celebrations and interests all through their life. Today you can find an endless selection of styles of tiny replicas of various items and many representatives of different factors of life from Zodiac signs to pets and hobbies. You can even personalize your charms to really make it personalized. This excellent assortment allows you to record your personal life journey in addition to don a fashionable piece of jewelry.
Contemporary classic charms are usually collected as souvenirs of different interests and important incidents in our lives as well as of precious pals and members of the family. They are usually accumulated with time and put together with a link charm bracelet to be a contemporary yet personalized jewelry. Charm bracelets bring an heartwarming significance in it as the charms accumulate through the years and passes through family generations. It can tell the story of a person and occasionally of the whole family simply by presenting different members of the family, family festivities and special moments for example births and weddings.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krisalyn (talk • contribs) 19:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charms for Charm Bracelets 

message: The town in which the Sons of Anarchy TV show is based.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.137.85 (talk) 07:23, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "Charming, California" redirect here? 

message: Windows 8 also has Charms. Why isn't it here? Sky6t (talk) 08:54, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: What about Charms on Windows 8?

message: Another CHARM in science stands for "comprehensive high-throughput arrays for relative methylation" and is described as "a highly sensitive and specific approach to measure DNA methylation across the genome" . It's apparently an emerging technique made possible by very recent technology, allowing scientists to analyze more than a specific loci at a time. Hozelda (talk) 17:19, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Another missing CHARM in science: comprehensive high-throughput arrays for relative methylation
Talk:Attalus I

message: The article has overreliance on ancient sources, which are not high-quality RS. (t · c) buidhe 01:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition, the ancient sources are taken at face value, whereas scholarship has focused far more on their reliance on Attalid PR. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 07:31, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  after a quick skim, it seems like the issues you raised last year were not addressed and the article still uses a lot of inline citations to primary sources. Are you interested in bringing this to FAR? Z1720 (talk) 18:27, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , I mean it's definitely not FA standard, but I don't really have the time or energy to fix it right now. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:50, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you be willing to nominate it at WP:FAR? This could bring the attention to other editors that this needs to be fixed. I would do it myself, but FAR has a 5-article-per-editor limit, and I'm at my limit. Z1720 (talk) 20:43, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020|FA sweeps]] 

message: "Soter" is not a surname in any sense but a epithet of many given to kings in the hellenistic age. Others include "Euergetes" or, in association with Alexander, "Megas" (the Great). The current wording is simply misleading. MeAmME (talk) 19:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Setting aside surname vs. epithet...  I did change the later edit of "epithet" back to "name".  The lede has to be written to be the most accessible to the widest audience, especially while it's on the front page, so maybe best to use "took the name Soter" at the very least.  An "epithet" is, strictly speaking, a "name", too, and for readers unfamiliar with the Hellenistic era who already see a blizzard of unfamiliar terms, we can use one simple word here to make things a tad easier.  SnowFire (talk) 19:44, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

text: As for "surname", please consider this Google search. Paul August ☎ 00:12, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  (sur)name or epithet
Talk:Saline River (Illinois)

message: The history section starts off with this: 
From 1807 to 1818 Illinois paid the United States Treasury $28,160.25. During the same time Ohio paid $240 and Indiana, Kentucky and Missouri paid nothing. 
These states paid the treasury for what??  This reeks of having been cut and pasted from some textbook or other such source by someone whose native language might use the same alphabet as English, but has little else in common.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.193.171.69 (talk) 19:56, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: And in the following sentence it says revenue. I corrected some minor errors. 216.85.175.4 (talk) 03:38, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writers needed
Talk:Vermilion River (Illinois River tributary)

message: As the article itself makes clear, there is another Vermillion River arising from very close to where this one originates.  It would really be a great service if someone could find a map to add to this article, just as the other river's article has a map.  Better yet, would that someone could create a map that showed both of these rivers which once upon a time were thought to be a single river. Unschool 02:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Map needed
Talk:Madidi National Park

message: Thanks for the great info. I noticed the Ecotourism section doesn't have a neutral point of view and reads like an advertisement. It'd be great if it could be edited accordingly. (David.xia 2018-10-03).  —Preceding undated comment added 18:59, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral Point of View of Ecotourism Section 

message: Leo1pard (talk) 16:32, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page views 

message: From simply reading the article, the park boundaries might take up a large portion of the shown map. Will (Talk - contribs) 05:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The page needs a map showing the park boundaries rather than simply the park location.
Talk:Reversible reaction

message: The DNA fact needs a citation.
:Yeah I was going to say it looks conceivably false, then I noticed I copied it in from another WP article somewhere, but I don't know where now. So I'm just removing it until it can be verified. I'm not an expert enough in the subject to support it myself. Here is the removed bit: "Metabolic pathways are a series of biochemical reactions which are, as a whole, irreversible. If the biochemical reactions involved in this process were reversible, we would convert our own DNA back to food molecules if we stop eating even for a short period of time." - Taxman Talk 00:37, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps 'entropically driven' as opposed to 'thermodynamically driven' could use a reference, too (since I've not a clue what it means). Geologist 23:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

message: The concentrations of reactants and products in an equilibrium mixture are determined by the analytical concentrations of the reagents (A and B or C and D) and the equilibrium constant, K.
What is the difference between analytical concentration and concentration? This sentence treats them as somehow distinct, but both links go to the same page. 89.217.14.255 (talk) 11:47, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analytical concentration vs. concentration 

message: Not a reaction pliz 77.246.52.173 (talk) 04:15, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revesable reaction l want adefination