lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Richard Allen (bishop)

message: I need to know how richard allen INFLUENCED OTHER PEOPLE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:He was a religious leader? — LlywelynII 02:10, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Need

message: The African Methodist Episcopal Church article indicates the AME Church was founded in 1793. This Wiki piece gives a date of 1816 as the founding date. The confusion needs to be addressed by someone more knowledgeable than I --Dumarest 12:59, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Second Great Awakening section on African Americans suggests that the group existed prior to that and just became formally independent of the Methodists' white bishops in 1816. If that's in error and the organization didn't exist at all, it probably needs correcting as well. — LlywelynII 02:56, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Founding  of the AME church

message: he was a great man
:Not to knock him, but Harry Hosier seems to have been a bigger draw and had a better memory and Absalom Jones got canonized. — LlywelynII 02:56, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Great
Talk:Jim Keith

message: Is he of Scottish Heritage? We have the same Last Name. Please Don't Remove This... it could lead to more Information for the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.18.45.100 (talk) 06:46, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Clan Keith Affiliation

message: Hi , many thanks for your .  In particular, thank you for finding the 1995 RGJ article.  I was wondering if you would consider removing the Tributes section as they are not WP:RS sources and do not appear to be authored by anyone notable. Perhaps we could have the findagrave link in an External links section and use Template:Find a Grave, though perhaps the link should be removed, see WP:FINDAGRAVE-EL.  Under "Interviews and Appearances" there are multiple links to the same Internet Archive video, perhaps these could be combined to just one link.  Cxbrx (talk) 15:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the review and recommendations.  I've removed the Find A Grave link, since I agree on second-look that it doesn't add anything new or noteworthy.  Combined all the A/V materials to External Links, and also shifted all "tribute" sites to the same section. Johnsonmt01 (talk) 17:08, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tributes 
Talk:BTDTGTTS

message: This page redirects to List of internet slang following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:54, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Which itself tells people to look at a Wiktionary appendix... which doesn't contain BTDTGTTS at all, so is completely useless! 86.132.141.139 (talk) 21:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Useless redirect IMO, though wiktionary has an article here. Maybe replace it? Sorry if my message seemed a bit harsh. ⌬ CH₃mificαtion! ⌬ 03:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless redirect IMO
Talk:Smith Island, Maryland

message: Seems like their ought to be some discussion of how Smith Island is split between Maryland and Virginia (see Smith Island, Virginia).  --J Clear (talk) 13:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maryland - Virginia 
Talk:Open-end fund

message: This page might as well be merged with the collective investment page.  Simon West 09:03, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Its been 3 years and no-one has objected, or got around to a merge with Collective investment scheme yet. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

text: One big reason for a merge is that this doesn't mention the current fashion in open-end funds, the exchange-traded fund. This article is clearly not being maintained.  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:02, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A merger would only work if closed-ended fund was also merged - and that page is much better. The preference would be to improve this page instead, if anyone is willing...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Westmorlandia (talk • contribs) 15:53, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Considering that searching for 'open ended' leads to this page, it really needs to mention the disambiguation page at Open-ended. --68.184.56.57 01:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: I've just savaged the intro, but I think to good effect - in particular, it had lots of material not specific to open-ended funds; not all open-ended funds offer to the public; shares, bonds etc are not "vehicles"; and investors emphatically do not have any equity interest in the underlying securities - even "effectively".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Westmorlandia (talk • contribs) 15:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to intro
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Odle Middle School

message: ** This disagreement is limited to a small subset of Wikipedia contributors.  I would imagine most editors do not participate on AFD and the vast majority haven't the slightest idea what happens here.  If we could agree to keep schools small and large, just as we do cities, a lot of wasted effort could be refocused on improving other areas of Wikipedia.  Silensor 06:35, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *I'd just like to say that I've always really enjoyed the "we could stop all these arguments if the people who disagreed with me would just shut up" argument. Lord Bob 07:06, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

text: ** When 300 deletion nominations, I repeat *three hundred nominations* all fail (hoaxes excluded), there comes a time when enough is enough.  Every 3 days one hundred new school articles are created, and 99% of all school deletion attempts fail.  There is no excuse for this any longer.   Silensor 07:25, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

text: ***I do think I understand what you're saying, but I just disagree that the best way to deal with what is at least a sizeable minority of AfD voters is to tell them to just give up. Lord Bob 07:41, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:The Mad Scientists' Club

message: From an original copy of The Big Kerplop, printed by McRae Smith Company in 1974,  —  The title on the jacket is rendered thus:  The BIG KERPLOP   An Adventure of the Mad Scientists' Club; and on the title page thus:  The BIG KERPLOP   A Mad Scientists' Club Adventure.  The Library of Congress title on the reverse of the title page is: The big kerplop; a Mad Scientists' Club adventure., which is consistent with the book's title page.  In any case, there's no exclamation point in the title, nor mention of "original adventure".  I think the title in the Wikipedia article should follow the Library of Congress pattern. Quicksilver 09:09, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The Big Kerplop
Wikipedia talk:Japanese Surname Policy/Proposal

message: Wikipedia already has an entry on Japanese names in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles) --DannyWilde 09:14, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please express your opinions, whether for one system or another or simply for or against systematization, at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles). Thanks Fg2 20:40, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I favor Surname, Given name order for all periods. Presently the Manual of Style has this form for all historical persons, and for modern persons, there is room for decision. My preference is Surname, Given name for all Japanese people. Fg2 08:38, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Yosef Avni

message: Since the KDH bombing is a terrorist act, and since Yosef Avni took part, I have put the article in this category. —Ashley Y 09:28, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The KDH was the British military headquarters; are attacks on military targets "terrorism"? Jayjg (talk) 22:14, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It was also the civil government headquarters, so yes. —Ashley Y 00:40, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The classification of the Irgun itself as a terrorist organization is debated, and certainly not a consensus. See the Irgun article for more information. In fact, the KDH bombing is widely considered to have been a legitimate military operation. Regardless, Category:Terrorists is unwarranted. --DLandTALK 22:11, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Terrorists]] 
Talk:Overton-on-Dee

message: Preserved, traditional, administrative... I muddle them all up, so anyone watching this article is strongly encouraged to check for and fix any errors and to fill in the bits I missed! --Telsa 09:31, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Overton is a town, albeit small and rural. It had market and borough rights, for one thing, and was a contributory borough to Flintshire. E. Davies (place names of Flintshire) describes it as a "town and parish in Maelor Saesneg". There was a market hall and market until the late 19th century. Svejk74 (talk) 11:09, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Counties
Talk:Proto-Dravidian language

message: http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Coimbatore/asko-parpola-flags-tamils-links-with-indus-valley-script/article482859.ece  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.188.183.89 (talk) 14:47, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tamil Link with the Indus valley script

message: there are no references cited whatsoever. Especially the relationship claims are useless without attribution. dab (ᛏ) 16:27, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:CITE

message: This artcile repeats the same things as those said in that article. Why not move this contents only to one page?--Imz 15:54, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article on Proto-Dravidian should specify the reconstructed grammar and lexicon. That's too specific for the Dravidian languages article, which should be a general overview and list. I propose we keep both, differentiating their contents better. CRCulver 16:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I strongly disagree, Proto 0f something is different from what it is today RaveenS 18:33, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Proto Dravidian is the name given to the language from which the present Dravidian languages developed.  So the very focus of the two articles is different - atleast, should be different.  Merging is not appropriate here.  Sarvagnya 17:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Dravidian languages]] 

message: Wiki Raja 10:55, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Dravidian civilizations

message: the palatal approximant is written as a *y in the reconstruction chart. In terms of IPA, this should be a *j. Is this an error?
Forrest<()> (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:12, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The notation of the rest of the chart is not IPA either. It's rather based on the usual transcription practices in languages of India and surrounds, comparable to the IAST. 4pq1injbok (talk) 12:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  palatal approximant in the reconstruction chart 

message: there is currently a tag for 'see also: Elamo-Dravidian' at the beginning of the History section.  The Elamo-Dravidian family is a single conjecture that has only fringe support in linguistics literature.  Elamo-Dravidian should have a place in the 'see also' section (which it currently does), I don't think it warrants a place at the lead of the History section, as it has only fringe implications on the broader discussion of Dravidian history. 24.104.240.230 (talk) 22:45, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  see also: Elamo-Dravidian
Talk:Ohmu

message: I removed Ohmu is the Japanese word for worm. The Japanes word for worm or bug is "mushi". If I remember correctly, Ohmu is written with the kanji big + bug.
--imars 09:59, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't the picture show a full-grown Ohmu, rather than a juvenile one? This picture misrepresents their size. Amaurea 16:26, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: "This article or section may contain original research or unverified claims."
I think it needs a reference page stating each of the sources of information (film, manga, etc). If you use literary sources, include the page # if possible. JAF1970 01:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unresearched claims

message: This page should be deleted or merged into the Nausicaä main page. There's no real reasoning behind it, and it is about a fictional creature. I don't think it's that noteworthy of a subject, and it having it's own article, while the characters don't is pretty stupid. Moocowsrule (talk) 06:09, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think that this page should be deleted
Talk:David (Bernini)

message: Avery and Finn in their book Bernini call his David  "a radical interpretation of his subject" while Wittkower, in his book on Bernini points out that in his  Pluto Abducting Proserpina  [Bernini's last work prior to doing this David] that Bernini, "rid his style of the last vestiges of Mannerism."  Post, in his two volume history of sculpture, also points to the David,and writes that it [ and the concurrent Apollo and Daphne ] "exhibits a technical dexterity rarely, if ever. equaled, in the world's history."  This all seems to support the claim made in the article that the piece was "revolutionary"  and so I am removing the "neutrality disputed" tag.  Carptrash 17:35, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had athe time of this posting added sources to back up this statment.  Someone has since removed them.  So..  i'm about to add them back as  sources rather then additional reading. Carptrash 15:26, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm removing a NEUTRALITY DISPUTED tag because 

message: I don't understand the use of the word "bribed" here.  If you pay an artist to produce work, why is it a bribe?  It certainly needs to be explained, or perhaps just removed.  Smallbones(smalltalk) 19:04, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "bribed"? 

message: what is the dazzling and who is Bernini 2001:4455:2D6:6500:1083:138E:6295:485B (talk) 13:15, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mapeh
Talk:Sheikh Khalifa City

message: Sheikh Khalifa is not Morag, and it is certainly not a former Israeli settlement. Morag has been demolished. It appears Sheikh Khalifa is a future project, is this true?--Doron 10:45, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't answer your question, but still going to create a normal article on Morag, Gaza, in place of that shameful POV redirect. If all old places were redirected to new places, then almost all the 'destroyed Arab villages in 1948' articles would point to Israeli localities. -- Ynhockey 13:57, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:The 7.30 Report

message: I had removed the older logo, but as rightly pointed out by Evolver of Borg who put it back, I failed to justify my decision. My rationale is that it's redundant: the logo is not significantly different from the current logo, it adds nothing to the article (the different logo has no significance to the program), and—especially at the article's current length—it needlessly clutters up the page. So I don't think it's necessary or desirable. If anyone has a good reason to keep it, make a note here; otherwise I'll remove it again. -- Guybrush 10:46, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I tend to agree, the article's too short for 2 pictures, although if the history section is expanded significantly then putting the old logo back into that section seems logical. Agnte 10:49, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree. If the image was of a really old logo, with some historic significance, then it should stay. But the two logos currently in the article are not that different from each other. I say the article's better off without the older logo. Cnwb 11:02, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For my case, I think we should keep the logo for historical purposes. Merging the two images into one however might be a better solution (the newer logo is a bit big as it is) as opposed to just removing it. I say we make a single image for the page. Evolver of Borg 22:08, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I dont see how having one image with both logos is any different to just having both logos. And if you're going to claim 'historical purposes' you might as well create History of the 7.30 Report Logo and put all the images in there :) .  As it stands having two near-identical logos on this small page is a tad redundant. Agnte 11:22, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two logos? 

message: I don't know enough about The 7.30 Report's history to really make an edit myself, but I recall that until about 1997 or so, The 7.30 Report here (Perth) was locally produced and hosted by Alan Carpenter, who is now a senior Minister in the WA Government. After 1997 or so, we got the national 7.30 Report broadcast, with Kerry O'Brien. - Mark 16:11, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  State editions 

message: Added an info-box. Cyril Washbrook 11:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: This is true!  Watch the 7:30 report and you can see that people in the labor party ar not interupted when they are being interviewed.  when someone who is part of the librial party is interviewed they are interupted constantly.  Im not being a vandal by saying this in the article how do you know that he is not doing it.  If you had watched an interview that kerry did with julia gillard she was not interupted once.  See a librial being interviewed he intrupts them non stop.  This means he is being too one sided.Pattav2 (talk) 08:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  controversy 

message: when is Chris Uhlman going to present the seven thirty report?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.176.49.163 (talk) 09:34, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Uhlman and The Seven Thirty Report
Talk:Benjie Paras

message: Hi Wikipedian c, I have returned the information regarding Benjie's acting career.  It is his current career and it is best to mention first before his basketball career.  Please don't remove it.  Thanks! and Happy Wiki-ing! :) --Jojit fb 10:55, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Any basis for being in Paris Hilton's phonebook? --Migs 10:21, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paris Hilton 
Talk:Delta-sigma modulation

message: At the bottom of the article in the Naming section, there is a claim supported only by WP:PRIMARY sources that the technique was invented in Japan in 1961 by Yasuhiko Yasuda and team. Can someone help VERIFY this? ~Kvng (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I found one secondary source in the EL section that verifies this. I have promoted this to a reference. ~Kvng (talk) 20:26, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invention 

message: Kvng - I made the revisions to correct the impression given that all of fig.1 was devoted to modulation when it is only the closed loop that is needed for that. I've no intention of repeating the correction, I leave you stuck with the incomprehension illustrated by your reversion and your tolerance of the error for the previous many months. As I originated the diagrams Fig 1,a,b.c and the relevant  discussion I feel you might have had more respect for my opinion. Fig 1b and 1c are mutilated by careless editing and try as I might I cannot clear the errors.Puffingbilly (talk) 00:28, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You have left us before.  If you'd stay and try to collaborate, we might get somewhere better.  Respect for your opinions will increase if you can explain them.  If there are errors, explain to us so we can try to go along with you.  Your recent edits were not convincing, nor very interpretable. Dicklyon (talk) 02:22, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

text: If that's directed at me, I'm pretty sure you're wrong.  I've had a pretty successful career involving all those things, including a recent invention involving adaptive sigma-delta conversion in a MEMS microphone.  Dicklyon (talk) 02:19, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest revision as of 14:18, 29 December 2020 (edit) (undo) (thank)
Talk:Gulfstream American GA-7 Cougar

message: Hi,
I made some changes to the speeds, reference was the pilot operating handbook,
to be found in the web under www.88thservices.com/pdf/cougarflightmanual.pdf.
E.g. for the VMCA I used indicated airspeed, which was replaced by calibrated airspeed.
My suggestion: To avoid such confusions one should clarify in the template, which speeds
shall be used, e.g. for cruise speeds KTAS (knots true airspeed), for stall speeds KCAS
(knots calibrated airspeed). And for the stall speed it should be clear which configuration
is meant, the value entered now is calibrated dirty (full flaps), I entered indicated speed
clean (no flaps).
I noticed, that for the speeds except the VNE the conversion to km/h does not work,
something to be done to that?
Best Regards,
Peterl70 (talk) 11:36, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for posting that link to the POH! That is a great help. I have corrected the specs from the POH for the Vmca. In the new-style specifications format the conversions are done automatically and they seem to be working right at the present! - Ahunt (talk) 15:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just double checked and you are quite right the template is not converting to km/h correctly. Let me see if I can get that fixed. The indication about whether speeds are IAS, TAS or CAS can be added in the "notes" section under each parameter, as I have done for minimum control airspeed. The notes are there to allow this sort of qualification to be included. - Ahunt (talk) 15:28, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All the uses of this template where kts are primary have a problem. Just to let you know we are working on it and it should be fixed at a template level, meaning that it won't require changes to this page. I'll drop a note here when it is fixed. - Ahunt (talk) 15:38, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for pointing out that template problem it has now been fixed! - Ahunt (talk) 12:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speeds