Talk:Maria Sharapova

message: Who she dated?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.240.150.123 (talk) 00:45, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Με τον άντρα ονοματι "Hakobian Lev"' 2A02:85F:F535:1500:29DD:670:B142:91DC (talk) 14:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No personal life section 

message: This article was too detailed, and I and others trimmed it down. Tennis expert objected, so I created the Career history fork from a prior version of the article to keep him placated. The fork was deleted and reinstated. Not understanding why it was reinstated (albeit as a redirect), I started rewriting the Career history into bullet form (so as to avoid duplication with style and content of main article) when Chidel re-established the redirect while I was working on it. Would anyone care to start a discussion on what should be 'merged' back?  Ohconfucius (talk) 15:52, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What to do with the Career history fork content?

message: What's the point of the "Early life" sub section? there are no other sub-sections, so I think it should be removeded. Agreed? Thanks Kvsh5 (talk) 07:11, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I do not agree - leave that section alone. Naki (talk) 20:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography - Early life

message: A 6'2" tall, large framed and physically well developed woman cannot possibly weigh a mere 130 pounds.  According to a modeling web site I visited recently Maria Sharapova weighs 68.5 kg.  That sounds about right, and that is why I edited her page, which stated her weight at 59kg.  However I cannot now find the website for verification.  So, we will just have to rely on common sense! Victoroyer (talk) 19:51, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Maria Sharapova's current weight

message: I'm not going to revert another edit, but the 'pro-NUN' should not be on the page. Only an idiot could think that the word 'Sharapova' was English and WP:PRON states clearly that IPA should be used, and as the sole transcription, for pronunciation of foreign, viz Russian words. Don't add the 'pro-NUN' just because you as a user don't understand the IPA; learn it!
Also, if you're going to ignore guidelines, do it properly. 79.67.246.166 (talk) 20:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct English pronunciation has the stress on the second syllable.  We should give the correct pronunciation in a way people can understand.  Otherwise readers who don't know IPA will not see the difference from the erroneous pronunciation used by TV announcers. --Trovatore (talk) 22:07, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: IPA is too elitist. There's no way most people could learn the well over 100 symbols in IPA. There should be a pronunciation in English alphabet too. QuentinUK (talk) 17:23, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't resist the opportunity to point you to , where she is Sharapôva in English, though more like Sharápova in Russian. Rothorpe (talk) 17:45, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

text: Sharapova speaks American English like a native (which she almost is). I doubt she goes around saying: "Well, actually my name is pronounced like this..." Rothorpe (talk) 18:09, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation ('pro-NUN') 

message: Change Los Angeles Lakers to New Jersey Nets, for Sasha Vujacic 
69.59.78.162 (talk) 23:35, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, sort of.  I see Sharapova's fiance Vujacic has moved from the LA Lakers to the New York Nets.  But "New York Nets guard" is kind of cryptic for an international encyclopedia, so I've instead changed it to "NBA basketball player".  Thanks, Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 15:08, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 69.59.78.162, 16 December 2010 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Media without a source as of 30 June 2011 
;What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Sharapova-waving.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Someone remove that horrid picture that was obviously put up by a troll. Dreadful.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.188.205.66 (talk) 03:25, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Not sure if it's just me but I can only view 2012 section when I am logged in?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OgiBear (talk • contribs) 14:47, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2012? 

message: I guess winning the career grand slam is not a significant achievement because it is certainly missing from the introduction. We need to add it in and link it to the section of the article on the Grand Slam page! This is the second best crème de la crème in the game, just short of doing it in a calendar year. She is also the first woman in the open era to get a Career Grand Slam from four Grand Slam wins (also the second person to do so in the open era and the fourth person ever to do so).HotHat (talk) 03:47, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead meets the criteria imho. Regards.--GoPTCN 12:35, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: I counted 16, pretty much one for ever sub-section of the article. I know she's a beautiful lady, but is that a little much?
216.185.77.30 (talk) 12:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as they do not stack each other or are violating the image policy, I don't see why not. Note that she is a tennis player, but only occasionally a model. Regards.--GoPTCN 12:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Excessive Images?

message: Nothing on Sugarpova yet in the article? Fixer23 (talk) 09:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sugarpova? 

message: There is an individual article with title Sugarpova. Suggest to merge the topic with this article as the subject Sugarpova has no scope as a separate topic. --atnair (talk) 16:26, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What is wiki policy on companies? I assume that most businesses are not notable on their own? Wilbur Chocolate Company and The Hershey Company are stand-alone articles for multiple reasons, but it seems that Sugarpova has only one reason... Maria Sharapova. A merge might be best here. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Agreed; the company is essentially a vanity project for its founder. Absurdist1968 (talk) 07:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sugarpova merge suggest 

message: According to the article "BELARUSIAN ROOTS of Maria Sharapova" her parents are both Belarusian, this should be cited more explicitly than just saying her parents came from Belarus, no?Historian932 (talk) 18:03, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The article says "Her parents, Yuri and Elena, are from Gomel, Belarus. Concerned about the regional effects of the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear accident, they left their homeland shortly before Sharapova was born." There is also a source link to a Russian article if you want more info (and you can read Russian). Since this is an encyclopaedic article/summary on Maria and not her parents, this seems like enough to me. What more pre-birth roots info would you like to include? Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:42, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belarusian not really "Russian"? 

message: 59kg? Really? That sounded light for someone who is 6ft 2in so I used a National Health Service BMI checker (http://www.nhs.uk/Tools/Pages/Healthyweightcalculator.aspx) which worked her out as dangerously underweight. My brother is a guy, is 5ft 10in and weighs about that and he is skinny guy. I don't understand why there is such reliance on one source, even if it is from the WTA website. If it said she was 200kg would you accept that? I am not removing the weight purely because it says not to unless you have a valid source to say otherwise. However I do think this sounds incredibly wrong Cls14 (talk) 18:44, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is wrong. Tennis and celebrity sites say she is closer to 6'4" and 75kg. I think the WTA only weighs a person once in their careers so she was probably that height and weight when she turned pro. Trouble is we have seen no other reliable source to change those infobox figures. If you can find a good one (not a blog) let us know. Women tend not to talk much about their weight. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Common sense dictates then that it is wrong. But we have no sources to say how much she does weigh. Rather than leaving wrong information on should we perhaps not remove the weight bit completely? Cls14 (talk) 21:41, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Or perhaps put a qualifier that says "59kg (in 2003)", her first full year in the pros, and when the WTA would have done the weigh-in. Fyunck(click) (talk) 23:13, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: But is there a source for that parenthetical, or are you just taking an educated assumption that it is a 2003 figure? Personally, I'd just get rid of the field; weight changes often enough that any source will soon be out-of-date, and unlike the combat sports or rowing, "weight" has no actual bearing on competition for a tennis player. (Yes, weight matters in tennis, but only in a athleticism/fitness standpoint, not in weight classes or a lightweight boat competition.) Courcelles 03:53, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The WTA usually does that your first full year on the circuit, and I think that was her first year. But I have no problem with it being removed. We know it's not correct today. Fyunck(click) (talk) 07:36, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

text: Ok, I am going to be bold and get rid of the category completely as we all agree it's wrong and we can only assume (although it's likely) that it is her 2003 weight Cls14 (talk) 09:48, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight 

message: I have made some clean-ups and now think that this article is near GA-status. Do you think it is ready to be nominated there? Regards.--Tomcat (7) 11:00, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely worth nominating, although peer review might have been a better first step, would you agree? I'd also consider doing individual season articles for her like they have with Serena and Azarenka but I realise these take an awful lot of work. Spiderone 10:16, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This is nowhere near ready, not in the last few sections, though it could be with a sprint of hard work.  (Like thre reviewer in GA5, I see the same thing, the further down you go, the less good it becomes, but the work can be done.) Courcelles 14:43, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA? 

message: I have taken the WP:BOLD step of removing all unsourced material from the article.  This should make it more compliant with WP:BLP as these are not simple facts like "sky is blue" or "Paris is in France."  This information is problematic to remain given the BLP issues. :(  Beyond that, it is hard to assess copyright issues when you do not know the sources of information.  I ask that unsourced information not be added back to the article. --LauraHale (talk) 11:01, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: BLP states "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be explicitly attributed to a reliable, published source, which is usually done with an inline citation." You can not just remove content that you feel is not supported by the references. I already explained that the official site contains a record of all stats and games.--Tomcat (7) 11:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is probably a little overboard to remove all unsourced material because of its quality. Please come comment at Wikipedia_talk:Good_article_nominations#Review_shopping. I have tagged the page with .--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  22:24, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

text:  I have added a tag there.  I have CHALLENGED this material.  Please pick one option: Tags for all unsourced information, removal of unsourced information, adding a tag at the top that informs people there is a need to fully source this.  Because right now, you have had two different editors challenge the lack of sourcing.  Given that a B article is supposed to be fully sourced and you RE-INSERTED large chunks of unsourced challenged material, I am dinging the assessment back to a C.  This article is nowhere near meeting a B criteria with 19000 KB of unsourced material. --LauraHale (talk) 22:25, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I got ECed By User:LauraHale else who tagged it before me.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  22:27, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Same problem when commenting.  Either solution works.  I do not care which option Tomcat wants, but there needs either be a clear indication material is not sourced by tagging in some way (I prefer fact tags as research has shown they are more likely to get cleaned then the bg one a tthe top) or removal of the information. Tomcat cannot have the option of neither, especially since they think the article is GA ready when it does not even meet the criteria for B class, which is pretty much fully sourced. (This does not even get into the issue of unsourced material that talked about her emotional state.  How can you do a thorough copyright check when the thing is not sourced?) --LauraHale (talk) 22:34, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to link me everytime you mention me and there is no reason to put a banner if I am working on the article. Stop pretending me to improve the article. Thanks.--Tomcat (7) 11:34, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: Hello Im a big fan of maria sharapova but her current ranking is not number 3 its number 4 please may you change it because its incorrect and people may get confused and other people that will find this out will say wikipedia doesn't have the correct information so please may you change it 
Ploop311 (talk) 21:43, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 December 2013 

message: The world ranking on no3 is not accurate.  Sharapova is currently no 4 in the world following a shoulder injury she obtained in 2013 and not participation in wta events during the last 5 months of 2013
82.3.92.31 (talk) 23:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 December 2013 

message: hi again maria is no 3 again an li na 4 change it because it annoies people 
Ploop311 (talk) 20:58, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: however the request was more annoying than the ranking. Be more polite in your requests. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:00, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 January 2014 

message: Besdelnik1 (talk) 17:22, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The IPA stress symbol comes before the stressed syllable. As you've written it here, that would place the stress on the second A in the name. As written in the article, it's correctly on the PO. See Help:IPA for English#Key. --ElHef (Meep?) 20:40, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 January 2014 

message: I think the article's main picture for a tennis player should show the player playing tennis.
I mean I guess instead of the current one (upper body purple dress) Sharapova's boyfriend could also take a picture of her in the bed and upload it to Wikipedia, but would it be the most appropriate picture?
I hope my point is understood.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.244.15.218 (talk) 16:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored the longtime infobox picture we put in by consensus many years ago. --Mareklug talk 22:54, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Every year has the yearly main article,so did it need so many details in every year summary? I think it can combine to four main parts： Early Year, 2004~2008,2009~2010,2011~present, they're different professional life of Sharapova.--Shiouloo (talk) 00:49, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, but then you can say that pretty much with every tennis bio. I don't feel she's any more detailed than Serena or Li or Nadal or Djokovic. Fyunck(click) (talk) 02:59, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  too many details 

message: The last sentence in the third paragraph of the introduction reads:
"Also, by winning her second French Open title at the 2014 French Open, she became only the 12th women in the Open Era to win 5 or more grand slam singles titles, and she is now tied with Martina Hingis with 5 grand slam singles titles in the Open Era."
Tied for what?  This needs to be filled in by someone who is knowledgeable.  (E.g., "tied for the fourth-most grand slam titles earned by a woman in the Open Era" or something like that.)Daqu (talk) 19:10, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tied for '''what''' ? 

message: Maria sharapova is the one who doesn't know who Sachin Tendulkar is....
Dmitri001 (talk) 22:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Good for her. Wikipedia is the encyclopaedia that doesn't fill articles with trivia. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:49, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've blocked Dmitri001 as a blatant block-evading sock of Tinaiyer1976 per WP:DUCK. Bishonen | talk 10:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 July 2014 

message: I was surprised to see the lack of recent images of Sharapova in this well-written article. According to WP:GACR, good articles should be illustrated when possible. I'd like to add these images. Any thoughts? Bede735 (talk) 21:27, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: All those images? No. There's already eleven images in the article. I'm not opposed to replacing images or adding a few more but each image should show something somewhat unique. --NeilN talk to me 21:39, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Is eleven a lot? Is there some MOS guidance on the appropriate number of images for an article? I would think that the appropriate number of images for an article is a function of the length of an article and the quality images available to illustrate that article. Bede735 (talk) 21:46, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a function of length. Usually 2 or 3 images is enough. This isn't a glamor magazine or photo exhibit on a tennis player. It's an encyclopaedic summary of Sharapova's career. The only pic that has value imho is "Sharapova at the US Open, August 2011." That's a good shot and could replace a different article image. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:33, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

text: No guidance on number but WP:IRELEV has "Adding multiple images with very similar content is less useful. For example, three formal portraits of a general wearing his military uniform may be excessive; substituting two of the portraits with a map of a battle and a picture of its aftermath may provide more information to readers. You should always be watchful not to overwhelm an article with images by adding more just because you can." We have closeups of Sharapova on the court. If more are to be added they should show something unique. --NeilN talk to me 21:59, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with WP:IRELEV and your caution on overwhelming an article with images. In this case, however, each of the images above illustrates her in competition during important matches addressed in the relevant section of the article. What's unique about these images is that they illustrate her in competition during specific milestones in her career—not simply replicating images of her hitting a tennis ball, preparing to hit a tennis ball, or commenting on her failure to hit a tennis ball with sufficient accuracy. Tennis is a visual activity; the article should reflect that. Bede735 (talk) 22:15, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objection to one image being added to each one of the currently imageless sections of the article. --NeilN talk to me 22:24, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Big objection to simply adding more of the same. Per Tennis project consensus we try to keep it to 10 or less. It's not etched in stone but I believe it's part of the guidelines. the photos must convey some extra information too. No most tennis articles are about tennis and most players have 2-5 pics. Sharapova is massively popular and has two extra pics on her cannon powershot commercials and her candyline. We don't count the infobox pic, but even the shots in there now start to get repetitious and ordinary in nature. If you find a truly great new public domain photo, by all means be bold and replace another pic and see if it sticks. try to space them nicely and on different side of the article. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:26, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Both sound like reasonable approaches. I'll add a few (above) and remove a few to better illustrate the article. Feel free to remove any with which you disagree. Regards, Bede735 (talk) 22:48, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  As long as the added images show different aspects and are not repetitious to the ones already published they could be added provided the total number stays reasonable and relative to the article size. The current images show most of her shots but an image of a backhand shot is still missing. FYI the shot labelled "Sharapova at the US Open, August 2011" is NOT from the 2011 US Open but from the 2011 Cincinnati Open (final).--Wolbo (talk) 13:16, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually there was a backhand pic in 2004 but it was recently replaced so I put it back. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:03, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: I request you to give me the permission to edit the page "Maria Sharapova'.
Skipper Roberts (talk) 11:04, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 May 2015 

message: Dear Wikipedia,
I, Skipper Roberts, request you to give me the permission to edit the page "Maria Sharapova". I promise I won't make any copyright violation. Kindly grant me the permission to edit this page.
Yours Sincerely,
Skipper Roberts
Skipper Roberts (talk) 08:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: According to the page's protection level and your user rights, you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. But please don't add content such as these to the article. - NQ (talk) 08:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 May 2015 

message: Dear wikipedia, 
I, Collin Fluffles, seek your permission to edit the page Maria Sharapova. I promise I won't violate the page. Kindly grant me the permission to do so.
Regards,
Collin Fluffles
Collin Fluffles (talk) 14:53, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Collin Fluffles, please see See WP:AUTOCONFIRM. Your user account must be more than four days old and have made at least 10 edits before you can edit the article. --NeilN talk to me 15:02, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2015 

message: Dear Wikipedia,
I, Kukkucupcake18, seek the permission to edit semi-protected pages , such as Maria Sharapova. Kindly give me the permission to do so.
Yours sincerely,
Kukkucupcake18
Kukkucupcake18 (talk) 11:50, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. —C.Fred (talk) 12:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 July 2015 

message: Maria Sharapova is currently ranked No.4 in the WTA Ranking, not No. 3.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.155.34.14 (talk) 12:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ranking information is incorrect 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Maria Sharapova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130810072751/http://www.wtachampionships.com/page/Scores/0,,12910,00.html to http://www.wtachampionships.com/page/Scores/0,,12910,00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130108004447/http://press.tiffany.com:80/News/NewsItem.aspx?id=130 to http://press.tiffany.com/News/NewsItem.aspx?id=130
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Maria Sharapova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100413075534/http://www.usta.com:80/Global/Pro_Tennis/Pro_Tennis/Wire/2010/04/09/Serena_Williams_Sharapova_withdraw_from_Family_Circle_Cup.aspx to http://www.usta.com/Global/Pro_Tennis/Pro_Tennis/Wire/2010/04/09/Serena_Williams_Sharapova_withdraw_from_Family_Circle_Cup.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091026222846/http://www.tennis.com/features/general/features.aspx?id=108430 to http://www.tennis.com/features/general/features.aspx?id=108430
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080714023402/http://nbcsports.msnbc.com:80/id/25396610/ to http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/25396610/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080607055611/http://nbcsports.msnbc.com:80/id/22856899/ to http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/22856899/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081022085350/http://www.princetennis.com:80/tennis/files/teamPrincePlayer.aspx?plyid=89 to http://princetennis.com/tennis/files/teamPrincePlayer.aspx?plyid=89
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Maria Sharapova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140606225531/http://origin-www.wtatennis.com/page/OffCourtNews/Read/0,,12781~2239156,00.html to http://origin-www.wtatennis.com/page/OffCourtNews/Read/0,,12781~2239156,00.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140427014408/http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jkWBQLZ15wdEi6m7Hpp14Jg8J8mg?docId=CNG.697f089e0b767f4cfb209463a0122c94.61 to http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jkWBQLZ15wdEi6m7Hpp14Jg8J8mg?docId=CNG.697f089e0b767f4cfb209463a0122c94.61
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130904213624/http://www.sportal.com.au/tennis-opinion-display/maria-not-ready-for-veterans-list-158083 to http://www.sportal.com.au/tennis-opinion-display/maria-not-ready-for-veterans-list-158083
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've just deleted a lot of this from the Sugarpova section.  The Endorsements section is full of it, if someone has a few minutes or more to spare... Boscaswell talk 06:55, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Masses of trivia 

message: I request you the permission to edit the page 'Maria Sharapova'. I won't do unneccesary edits.
Joliekukku (talk) 08:14, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself.  B E C K Y  S A Y L E S  08:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2016 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Maria Sharapova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130423171125/http://graph.document.kremlin.ru/page.aspx?1623257 to http://graph.document.kremlin.ru/page.aspx?1623257
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:36, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Maria Sharapova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110626054231/http://www.wtatennis.com/SEWTATour-Archive/Rankings_Stats/Millionaires.pdf to http://www.wtatennis.com/SEWTATour-Archive/Rankings_Stats/Millionaires.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.sonyericssonwtatour.com/SEWTATour-Archive/Rankings_Stats/Singles_Numeric_2003.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130517115202/http://www.wtatennis.com/scontent/article/3010014/title/wta-awards to http://www.wtatennis.com/scontent/article/3010014/title/wta-awards
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221231212/http://ajw.asahi.com/article/sports/topics/AJ2011093012822 to http://ajw.asahi.com/article/sports/topics/AJ2011093012822
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130421031247/http://www.wtatennis.com/scontent/article/3010014/title/wta-awards to http://www.wtatennis.com/scontent/article/3010014/title/wta-awards
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Maria Sharapova. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120925202148/http://www.chinapost.com.tw/sports/tennis/2010/05/24/257792/Sharapova-wins.htm to http://www.chinapost.com.tw/sports/tennis/2010/05/24/257792/Sharapova-wins.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:27, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion