lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sonia (singer)

message: Should this really be under Sonia Evans - since she was only ever known as "Sonia"?--Tuzapicabit (talk) 01:37, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to ask the same thing. If she is "better known as just Sonia", why the title is Sonia Evans? Bisbis (talk) 21:28, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the article yesterday (as no one contested it). Bisbis (talk) 05:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: This article still needs additional reliable, 3rd-party sources. IMDB is not considered a true reliable source for information. "hem.passagen.se" seems to be a fansite, and the remainder are sources affiliated w/ the subject. --AbsolutDan (talk) 11:52, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Not sure if this is 100% true but my work colleague has just informed me that Ms Evans the 80's starlett will soon be parading hit after hit at Croydons very own Tiger sometime in May 2009!! LOVE IT!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.172.213.165 (talk) 15:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  TIGER TIGER, CROYDON
Talk:Sheathbill

message: reverted last edit becuase it uninentially made things worse than before. jimfbleak 16:17, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Kelp links here with "Kelp pigeon".  Is this a common name for the bird? FireWorks 19:15, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kelp
Talk:Daniel E. Barbey

message: What exactly was Barbey's role at Balikpapan and the other operations in the Borneo campaign of 1945? I'd always been led to believe they were primarily Australian ops, with some US support in the form of LCs.Grant65 (Talk) 16:32, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
*He commanded VII Phib. While the majority of land forces were Australian, most of the naval forces participating were American. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:21, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Palladas

message: It does need to be cleaned up though.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 16:40, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: The Google translate version of "A Question of Gender" was very inaccurate, so I deleted it. For future reference, Google translate can NOT translate Ancient Greek, it can only translate modern Greek. If you want to see alternate translations that aren't in published books, or want to know the grammar or vocabulary of a specific work, I recommend asking people online who know Ancient Greek. For instance, on r/ancientgreek or TextKit. Korkarim1923 (talk) 14:01, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google translate
Talk:Josephite marriage

message: here is a reference from googling this phrase:  Spiritual Marriage: Sexual Abstinence in Medieval Wedlock by Elliot, D., published by Princeton University Press  --Unfocused 21:47, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference for content research 

message: Although the name may come from Joseph and Mary, most protestants would regard that as a misnomer. (see the biblical references to Jesus's brothers and sisters - some take this literally, others want to believe that Mary remained a Virgin and so reinterpret these references).
-- Beardo 04:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Josephite 

message: Should be more info about the history of early Christianity, when the Gnostics were even more ascetic than the orthodox Christians. AnonMoos 17:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: Does the FLDS section belong here? They used the term "spiritual marriage" to mean polygamy (with sex). That's very different than the commonly accepted definition of the term, which refers to chaste marriages (without sexual activity), and which is what the main article seems to be about. The two concepts don't really have any relation to each other apart from name. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 07:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: FLDS section

message: "comes from the original divine law that marriage should be the union between soulmates who are attracted to each other by divine magnetism and not by the animal magnetism of sexual activity. " Could anyone back up this statement? From what I remember from Bible study, Adam and Eve (the first married couple, defined as "one-flesh") were explicitly commanded to fill the earth, and if that was done asexually it would be nice to have a cited reference how it was done.
AnonymousBrother201 (talk) 14:55, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 2015
Talk:Rosanna Arquette

message: Should have something about her role in outing Harvey Weinstein.Conscientia (talk) 21:09, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed! I just got it started. Folks, please do not move this crucial career information into the Personal life section. — Kimbia-kimbia (talk) 17:43, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Harvey Weinstein

message: Changed "Searching For Debra Winger" year to 2002 per Google. I am not sure if this is correct, but it's probably better than two contradicting dates (which were added, btw, in a single edit ). --Asqueella 16:47, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Searching For Debra Winger 

message: There's nothing here on her relationship with Paul McCartney.  Then again, I only hear about it in the tabloids.  I think I saw her on the Grammys.  She may have been filling in for him because he had to go to court the next day back home.  We'll just wait nad ssee where this goes before we add it here.Sposato (talk) 19:40, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Paul McCartney

message: No one put in that her birthname was Lisa.  Alexis said it himself in his recent documentary that he, Rosanna, and Richmond were born Robert, Lisa, and Mitchell respectively.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.162.52.32 (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth Name

message: "Her father was a convert to Islam and a descendant of explorer Meriwether Lewis.[3][4][5]"-Lewis died unmarried and with no children.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CFPeterson (talk • contribs) 20:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Meriwether Lewis

message: I removed "Personal" section as there are no references to support any of the text. --BweeB (talk) 20:17, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "Personal" section
Talk:Debunk

message: For a May 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Debunk
----
Can't we speedy this one, as it's already on wiktionary and is obviously a dictionary entry?Chiacomo 16:52, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Withdrawn, article is taking shape... --Chiacomo 21:56, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:C. C. Catch

message: Now that C.C.Catch is just a redirect, shouldn't it rather be redirected to Carline Müller and not Muller? Other articles have Umlauts in their titles when it is their name (Hermann Göring et al).
BigBen212 16:54, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: True, but not with proper names, as many examples show. Usually, the english version of names do exist as a redirect to the proper spelling. I would change it myself, but don't want to start any conflict here. BigBen212 23:05, 16 May 2005 (UTC)

text: Alright, I am not an expert here, and I don't care about Caroline Müller a single bit. I don't even want to look up any rules or regulations on this. Let's just not worry about it. BigBen212 15:39, 18 May 2005 (UTC)

text: )))Vorash 18:07, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Consider Wikipedia:Naming conventions (technical restrictions) which says what titles are possible and which aren't, meaning that German Umlauts would be allowed, but the cyrillic character set is not ... at least not in the english wikipedia. BigBen212 19:17, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ...that she never seems to have released any records (or if she did, they never charted) in the Netherlands...? 91.85.189.32 (talk) 09:14, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: When she was 14, she moved to Germany, she speaks German fluently, her music carreer started definitely in Germany. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvhiTruRKa8 (E-Kartoffel (talk) 16:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting
Talk:List of symbiotic relationships

message: This article purports to be about types of relationship, but is currently a list of specific relationships between species, mainly of undefined type (!) and uncited. It would be in order to remove all the uncited material, and all the entries which do not concern types of relationship, which would leave a very few paragraphs. Perhaps this is what should be done - it would amount to a nearly total rewrite.
The list should presumably contain a section on each of the following topics: mutualistic symbiosis; endosymbiosis; parasitism; commensalism; cleaning symbiosis; and perhaps a few others. Any other opinions? Like to help? If not, I'll give it a try. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:22, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  An article gone astray? 
Talk:N3 road (Ireland)

message: I have started a section on junctions in line with other topics. It's very patchy, hopefully somebody can improve on it. Etchy (talk) 19:43, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Junctions

message: I'm taking out the stub marker. It's only a road, so how much more do we need before it becomes an article? If anybody disagrees, feel free to put it back in. jlang 12:34, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The article doesn't/didn't argue against the need to have a motorway, and I think it's unnecessary that it provides arguments in favour. This is specifically about the *route* chosen, i.e. through and not around the valley. zoney  ♣ talk 22:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not sure what point you're making. Should the pros and cons be deleted? Signor Eclectic 22:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub?

message: Now that the M3 upgrade has been completed, I wonder if we still need to Time Line part of the article. It is overly long and too detailed.  None of other Motorway article have this.  If there is no objection I will remove this Bigar (talk) 19:07, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Time Line section 
Talk:Elsie Tanner

message: Isn't it a given that if it's a character on a soap opera, that it's going to be fictional? 65.0.142.22 17:07, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Obviously fictional

message: I've tagged this for lack of verification rather than fact tagging each line because the issue is not specific lines are not verified, the issue is that there is no verification or sources provided whatsoever.  I'm not familiar with Coronation Street, other than the fact that it is a UK TV show, so I'm not sure where to begin with sourcing, but a good start would be to link the website for the show...--Isotope23 20:11, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag

message: Was the character of Elsie Tanner ever actually killed off? Tripod86 22:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not officially, no. 88.104.23.174 (talk) 04:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Death?

message: Pat Phoenix was not diagnosed as having lung cancer before she left the Street. In 1983, the actress had a breast cancer scare - but this proved to be groundless. This was recorded in the tabloid newspapers of the time. Her lung cancer diagnosis came in March 1986.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Solidsandie (talk • contribs) 12:48, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pat Phoenix - Cancer Diagnosis 

message: I removed the unreferenced 'née Grimshaw' (and supposed parents' names) as the origin is non-canon novel 'Coronation Street: The War Years' by Daran Little. The only references to this are from the novel and quotes of this wikipedia article. Fanx (talk) 06:53, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: née Grimshaw?

message: Although it was mentioned in last night's episode of Coronation Street by Dennis that Elsie had died 6/7 years ago in a car crash with her lover Bill Gregory,this is not exactly true...Because in the 1987 video special entitled 'The lives and loves of Elsie Tanner is was very much hinted at,in fact almost made clear that she had died around that time.Correct me if I'm wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.78.131.191 (talk) 01:45, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that it was left unclear - Linda never saidn outright - plus surely Emily or Mike would have said if she had passed. Plus you can't accuse Coronation Street itself as being wrong - only they can decide after all.Rain the 1 BAM 02:27, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And? I've also watched this episode you mentioned. She could have had a break down, life threatening acident, a seperation etc... If a source is found from a coronation street source explaining she died back then, then it will be okay.Rain the 1 BAM 21:36, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death ref 2
Talk:Elizabeth Manley

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 19:29, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Antimagic square

message: A magick Square of order three goes like thus:
9,8,7
2,1,6
3,4,5
Jaynus _Izanagi 17:25, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not an anti-magic square by definition. The sums are all different, but do not form a sequence of consecutive numbers. An antimagic square of order three is impossible, it just hasn't been mathematically proven yet. Pure Pandemonium 23:38, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: By which you mean it has been mathematically proven, but not elegantly.  See proof by exhaustion. 23:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

text: You have exhibited a heterosquare, not an antimagic square 23:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order Three 

message: Hi.  I've added some discussion of the sparse generalization.  But perhaps this should have a page of its own.    Comments anyone?  Robinh (talk) 21:11, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sparse antimagic squares

message: If there have to be numbers from 1 to 9 in 3x3 square, we can test all 362880 squares. It can be done using computer. Can it be proof of non-existense of 3x3 magic square?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.20.141.208 (talk) 14:53, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: open problem
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ohio Womens Methodist Seminary

message: *Isn't it entirely possible and believable Ohio Womens Methodist Seminary either co-existed with Ohio Wesleyan Female College or was an original or alternate name name of OWFC? (For anyone else wondering about the Wesleyan/Methodist distinction, Ohio Wesleyan University, per its article Patnaik was the last to edit, was founded by Methodists in 1841; the Wesleyan Methodist church formally split from the Methodists in 1843.) Comparing a rural 19th century women's college to a "secret society" because Google provides no hits overstates and assumes bad faith. It's certainly verifiable one way or the other with hard copy sources, and we should assume good faith on the part of the creator. The article doesn't mention any man, so it doesn't seem "glorify" Stude62's great+grandfather as the nominator charges. In Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Monnett Weekend, it was not deleted for the reasons Patnaik alleges. And an article about a college is not a "POV fork" of an article about a patron of the college. Samaritan 17:31, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Mary Monnett Bain

message: See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mary Monnett Bain for an archived discussion regarding this page. Andrewa 18:24, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: It is Wikipedia practice to place articles in the most appropriate categories or subcategories.  Bain was a fine Methodist woman, and therefore belongs in the Category:Methodists.  That category, in turn, is a subcategory of Category:Methodism.  Unless there's some grand rationale, Wikipedia practice is that an article does not belong in both a subcategory and its "mother" category; that's redundant.  An exception in the case of Methodism could be Francis Asbury (for example).  Clearly, he belongs in "Methodists".  But he was so crucial to the development of American Methodism, he should probably be listed there also.  Bain did great things for Methodism, but clearly belongs in one category and not the other.  To put her in "Methodists" is not to say she's "just a Methodist"...far from it!  As a Methodist, I rejoice that this woman is a part of my family!  But let's adhere to Wikipedia policy and practice.  Thanks...KHM03 21:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See here for the policies in question...thanks.  KHM03 21:57, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories
Talk:Cleopatra (disambiguation)

message: I propose a merge with Cleopatra (film). It would look like this. Any thoughts? AndyJones 10:38, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: What's causes social media  accounts to be hacked and can I gain back my access to them 66.220.183.1 (talk) 14:08, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past literature
Talk:William D. Ford

message: Was he a relative of Henry Ford?
No, he wasn't related to the Fords of Ford Motor Co. mp2dtw (talk) 01:59, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If anyone out there knows why, it'd be a good addition to the article to indicate why the federal direct student loan program is name for him. Presumably he had something to do with it during his time in congress, but I don't know. oknazevad (talk) 20:51, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Student loans
Talk:Variadic macro in the C preprocessor

message: It should be said how the user (= body of the function) accesses to (possibly existing) extra arguments and their number. — MFH: Talk 19:07, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  There may be compiler extensions, but there is no way for the macro itself to find out.  Note this has nothing to do with stacks; you may be getting confused with variadic functions --Akihabara 22:49, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnamed section 

message: What happens if you use dprintf("Hello, world", "another string", foo, i);? That is: using a variadic macro with a different number of variables. That's what the variadic macros are good for, right? I don't see how this is supposed to work. --Abdull 09:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The stdarg.h article describes how it works. . --Abdull 09:36, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  more arguments 

message: The article says an ellipsis is used to declare a variadic macro. This is wrong. A variadic macro is declared with three dots ("...", or "\u002E\u002E\u002E"), not with an ellipsis ("…" or "\u2026").  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.151.76.100 (talk) 08:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an ellipsis 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 01:05, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Variadic macro →  – Countless other languages have variadic macros, but do not seem to fit into the article (on one hand due to its organization, on the other hand due to systems that don't work on text substitution). Artoria2e5 🌉 08:05, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 April 2021 

message: @Artoria2e5: You may want to edit the article to remove references to non-C preprocessors.  I will leave it up to you on deciding what to do with the newly created redirect , whether it be leaving it alone, converting it to an article, or nominating it for WP:RfD.  ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 01:17, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-closure cleanup
Talk:Maurycy Gottlieb

message: I love this picture like mad, but there's no room for it on the page. It's on the Commons, and I hope that someone who knows about painting will expand it to the point where I can again include it. (I think it may be his most famous work.) Good starting points are  and . grendel|khan 19:16, 2005 May 12 (UTC)
There's a stash of a few high-quality scans at . Still, I thought he was supposed to be madly prolific? grendel|khan 15:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "a Jewish painter, of Polish-speaking Galician Jews"
Why do you divide people? This statement is racist. He was a POLISH painter of Jewish race / faith. You don't describe Polish Tatar by saying "a Muslim painter, of Polish-speaking Masovian Tatars"... Gottlieb was a POLISH painter regardless of his race or faith.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.65.227.150 (talk) 23:01, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 
Talk:Piero Gemelli

message: from User:213.140.6.112
:(from the /temp page on 6May05), REFFERING TO COPYRIGHTES PROBLEM, the biography infos about PIERO GEMELLI that appears on this WIKIPEDIA page are the official authorized PGEMELLI bio-infos and it's under copyrithes of ©PIERO GEMELLI /AFORISMA srl ITALY publish those infos on the Wikipedia pages is autorized by myself PIERO GEMELLI for images or other infos about PIERO GEMELLI is it possible to go to google/images and type " piero gemelli". signed by  PieroGemelli
:(from the article page on 12May05), REFFERING TO the NOTE BY " Silversmith 11:18, 4 May 2005" "Piero Gemelli A lot of info added in one - the first - edit. Looks like it's all taken from [235](http://www.luciavietri.com/en/gemelli/biografia.html)--Silversmith 11:18, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Permission notices
Wikipedia talk:Template standardisation/Sizes

message: *Sounds like a good idea. Especially the extreme minimalist one :). I do think we should decide on one standard template and stick with that. Radiant_* 19:37, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
:"One size, and make it a large" you mean? Thats just not going to work - the process bias tendency for bloat is too strong. Better to offer a simple choice - the larger might be appropriate for the first hour or so, and after that nobody wants to see it - use the smaller one. Whats wrong with choice? -05:16, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it should not - It should be at Wikipedia talk:Template standardisation. We really have a problem with consolidated talk issues. -SV|t 05:16, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:WebTV Networks

message: This article should be titled WebTV.  Microsoft TV grew out of the WebTV business some time after it was acquired by Microsoft, and it has a distictly different target market and product line.
As Microsoft employee formerly in the WebTV (MSNTV) organization, I agree 100% with this. Microsoft TV is completely different -- it's related to Microsoft's cable provider foundation software product. Ameltzer 02:35, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Dare Wright

message: Is Julian Schnabel still set to direct the movie?  It was once on the IMDB, but I see that it is removed.  This leads me to think the movie is canceled.  Syosset 01:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie?

message: I found this article  showing a difficult relationship with her mother, possible to be considered abuse. Is it trustworthy? Should it be mentioned in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maladiq (talk • contribs) 18:56, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abusive relationship with her mother?
Talk:False statement

message: Is there a reason "The terrorists win" redirects to this article?  Near as I can tell it would be more appropriate to classify it as a thought-terminating cliche or a logical fallacy of some kind.  199.20.68.40 (talk) 14:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree.  If anything, "The Terrorists win" should re-direct to the terrorists have won.  Can somebody please fix? GreaseballNYC (talk) 22:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "The terrorists win"