lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Christopher Pettiet

message: I added additional biographical material as well as proper citations/references.  I added a link to a touching Open Letter written by his manager, as well as included some its text in-article.
I also removed the "no references" tag from the article.
I also removed the table toward the end of the article listing his one Young Artist Award and two nominations.  As this is not a very well known award (not surprising given the flood of awards that have washed over US TV in the last 20-25 years), I listed his one "win" in the articles texts.  The two "nominations" I do not consider as having been significant enough to be mentioned.  It would be one thing if they'd been Emmy nominations...
PainMan (talk) 05:54, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added cites & additional bio material...
Talk:Morphotectonics

message: Could stand to be a bit clearer for the lay person... Kathy A. 20:14, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article needs citations. I was able to find that the first two sentences of the first paragraph are directly copy-pasted from Geomatics Technique on Morpho-Tectonic study around MalaiMahadeshwara hill range of Northern Granulite Terrain, South India, and the last two sentences of the first paragraph and almost all of the last paragraph are copy-pasted from Remote Sensing Based Assessment of Neotectonics and Morpho-Structures of Krishna Sub-Basin: A Preliminary Probe for Oil and Gas Occurences[sic]. The article needs to be revised to paraphrase instead of directly copy, and sources need to be cited.
MJHeas (talk) 00:42, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding Current Citations (or Lack Thereof) 

message: I found these potential sources to try build back up the page with. Any recommendations? Thank you!
Scheidegger, Adrian E. (2004). Morphotectonics. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. ISBN 978-3-642-18745-2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18745-2
Burbank, Douglas W.; Anderson, Robert S. (2012). Tectonic Geomorphology: Second Edition. Chichester, United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1444338874. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444345063
Doornkamp, J. C. (1986). "Geomorphological approaches to the study of neotectonics". Journal of the Geological Society, London. 143 (2): 335-342. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsjgs.143.2.0335 
Summerfield, M.A. (1987). "Neotectonics and landform genesis". Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment. 11 (3):384-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913338701100305
Gutiérrez, Francisco; Gutiérrez, Mateo (2016). Landforms of the Earth. Basel, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. ISBN 978-3-319-26947-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26947-4
MJHeas (talk) 08:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Citations for Article
Talk:Leonard Read

message: Deleted the word "radically" from the first sentence of the fourth paragraph. The word "radically" seemed to be used in a pejorative sense. The elimination of the word does not alter the intention of the sentence that Mr. Read was becoming progressively more libertarian. 
The URL's found when clicking on Leonard Read at the bottom of the page are no longer valid. Hence it is not possible to verify the data in the article against the data that may have been found in the URL's.Tgp2065 (talk) 02:34, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit On October 20th 
Talk:Assyrians in Armenia

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.aina.org/news/20100421193134.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dana boomer (talk) 15:13, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Lugduname

message: I realize this page isn't exactly up to par yet... please anyone who can contribute while I'm away, do so.  I intend to eventually figure out how to make good images for chemical structures and post one, as well as posting a synthetic scheme for Lugduname.  As a side, anyone who can help me figure out how to do these last 2 things feel free to send it to my profile
--Finnigan awake 20:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

message: what does it taste like?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.122.94 (talk) 23:57, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  any updates on human use?
Talk:George Ticknor

message: Certainly he died, and the date is in the infobox, but a mention of the time and place and circumstances would be a good idea. J S Ayer (talk) 19:55, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did he die? 

message: Mark Dimunation, rare books librarian at the Library of Congress, in his lecture at the Rare Books School in Virginia, states Thomas Jefferson, after selling his 6000+ library to re-establish the Library of Congress, proceeds to ask a young George Ticknor, to buy books for him, as Ticknor journeys to Europe in 1815. 2601:280:CA80:8970:D079:22E7:C96F:FF20 (talk) 10:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buying books for Thomas Jefferson in 1815
Talk:Los Angeles bid for the 2016 Summer Olympics

message: Is that O.K that i put the sports section of L.A.?--Redspork02 18:42, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPORTS 

message: I don't see why the cleanup tag is needed, and I have removed it.--Desmond Hobson 23:35, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No reason for cleanup

message: I've added the unreferenced tag. The biggest problem is that much of it currently looks like Original research and speculation. There is also a Chicago Tribune quote, but you need to do a full reference (preferably using the  template). BlankVerse 12:04, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced

message: * THat visit took place last week and all of the above people are mentioned in the article. Please dont remove.--Redspork02 14:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Screw it. Still, I know Chicago won't get the games either. Oh well... there's always 2020.-- bulletproof 3:16 21:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Supporters
Template talk:System of a Down

message: Was Metro / The Metro ever released as a single ? -- Beardo 20:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I thought that it would be better to remove airplay only singles (radios play what song they want to be honest, you can't really know if it's a single or not, it's not an official single). What do you think?  gracz54 (talk) 07:18, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove airplay only singles?
Talk:Claudius Rich

message: The current main image :File:Rich claudius.jpg is poorly sourced as the website it came from does not explain where they got the image from. It appears to be scanned from an out of copyright book and in turn a photograph of a oil painting. Perhaps someone has an idea of which work this might have come from? Fæ (talk) 11:30, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information on portrait 
Category talk:Christian mystics

message: There are quite a  lot of names which need adding to this list, for example:
Francois Fenelon; - Please elucidate justification
Ignatius of Loyola; - Done
Theresa of Lisieux; - Done
Jan Ruysbroeck; - Done
Walter Hilton; - Done
Richard Rolle; - Done
The author of "The Cloud of the Unknowing". 
If any one can check whether these people have entries in Wikipedia, I really think that at least some of the above should go on the list. ACEO 20:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't attempted even a half-way study of the list, but some of the entries are so manifestly erroneous as to raise serious suspicions that contributors have no clear idea of what mysticism (in the Christian context) is:  for example, Richard Jefferies is on no footing a Christian mystic, and the article on him doesn't mention that he is a Christian of any kind (it alludes to his being a "nature mystic").  This seriously impairs the credibility of the set.  I will add that receipt of apparitions is not, of itself, proof of mysticism.  Thus, St. Bernadette was not a mystic: Laurentin - one of her leading biographers - says that after the apparitions she "returned to the normal state of faith in her daily life" ("St. Bernadette of Lourdes", Darton Longman and Todd, 1979 pbk, p.192). Ridiculus mus (talk) 10:33, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Berlin Görlitzer Bahnhof

message: The essential data is missing. Where are the dimensions? Long of the shed, width, height, number of platforms, number of tracks...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.230.93.31 (talk) 01:15, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James Meadows Rendel (engineer)

message: I removed the dead links from these.   For Colchester and Arundel navigation I suspect the DNB combined two separate items given that Colchester is in Essex and Arundel in West Sussex.   Arundel may refer to the Portsmouth and Arundel Canal and related items while Colchester might refer to some plans for the River Colne, Essex.    The Montrose Suspension Bridge might refer to the Montrose Chain Suspension Bridge originally built by Samuel Brown (called the South Esk Bridge in his article).  --Erp (talk) 04:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colchester and Arundel navigation  and Montrose Suspension Bridge
Talk:Duke Nukem 3D/Archive 1

message: There was a sepearate page, Monsters from Duke Nukem 3D which listed all sort of monsters. I did not understand most of it, but anyway: That page was listed for deletion, the debate is at
Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Monsters from Duke Nukem 3D.
The result was merge with this article. It is now done.
Sjakkalle 14:10, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vfd-note 

message: I don't know of a cameo appearance of Star Wars in the game but one of Star Trek (a hidden room which looks like the bridge of Enterprise), so I replaced Star Wars with Star Trek. 193.171.121.30 18:45, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the levels is apparently a giant model of the Enterprise when viewed from a sufficiently large distance.Sockatume 21:45, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Wars/Star Trek 

message: The sentence goes "More controversy in a similar vein would later show up with Take-Two Interactive (who teamed up with 3D Realms as a distributor) and their Grand Theft Auto series."
The first time I read it I got the impression that Take-Two and 3D Realms had teamed up to distribute GTA, which I'm pretty sure is not true. The sentence needs to be clarified and either moved to its own paragraph or removed altogether. Comments? Qutezuce 17:48, July 26, 2005 (UTC)
:Fair point.  I've edited the sentence since someone else put it in, but I don't know anything about it (though I'm sure you're correct re: 3D Realms not distributing GTA).  So edit away I reckon.  --Plumbago 21:49, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments about Take-Two and 3D Realms 

message: I wasn't about to add it in myself, but I thought it was interesting to note that Bruce Campbell dislikes the Duke Nukem games for blatantly copying popular culture references of the era.--Vercalos 23:37, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Like you I am not sure something about this should be added. If you ask me Campbell was simply somewhat misinformed about the subject. I remember reading he was angry because Duke Nukem was only quoting the Evil Dead films, but that isn't true. Some of his quotes (quoting being something you can do freely) were from the film, but only a few. I suspect that if he knew that, he wouldn't even have commented on the games. (Also he was advertising a game he did the voice for in one fell swoop, so maybe that's why he said it the way he did at the time.) Retodon8 01:02, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Bruce Campbell
Talk:East Coast FM

message: This article was edited by User:83.70.134.177, an IP adress assigned to user "EASTCOASTRADIO" at Eircom. --Kiand 20:46, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Said user is repeatedly removing any information that might be seen as "harmful", such as actual facts (lowest market share of any non-Dublin ILR, second-lowest reach of any non-Dublin ILR). Both of those statements can be verified by the exact same PDF used to verify the 56% figure. --Kiand 11:45, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Turn Around, Look at Me

message: The article here indicates that "Turn Around, Look At Me" was not the most popular side of the record by The Lettermen and that the B side "Julie" was bigger.  This is untrue.  "Julie" just missed making the US Top 40. The big hit was:  "Turn Around, Look At Me". 
70.135.170.160 (talk) 01:40, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Lettermen's Version of Turn Around, Look At Me 

message: I've just watched a recording of a 1977 concert by Campbell at the Royal Festival Hall (London) where he claimed he co-wrote this song.
95.150.40.189 (talk) 19:57, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glen Campbell as co-writer? 

message: There's a person on youtube who says it was actually his grandfather who wrote it, and sold it for $500. Comments here:   ;) AMCKen (talk) 06:55, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer
Talk:Horace Darwin

message: I was surprised to see that the article began by describing Horace Darwin as a "civil engineer".  I believe that 100 years ago this just meant "non-military engineer", which would be a fair description.  Today "civil engineer" indicates more specialism, and I think we would, given his founding of and contributions to the Cambridge Scientific Instrument Co., describe him as a mechanical electrical and general engineer.  So I propose updating the article to define him simply as an engineer.  Any comments?
Ambrose H. Field (talk) 14:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  General engineer, rather than "civil engineer"
Talk:Duke Nukem 3D/Archive 2

message: What about mentioning the "chew gum" line, that one stands in my head the most from playing years ago.  Maybe another article with quotes would be good?
:You could always try Wikiquote.  Other videogames are quite well represented there.  Cheers, --Plumbago 13:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: humor

message: I've just removed some formatting re: the article's infoboxes.  My feeling is that sandwiching article text between two infoboxes (the table of contents and the infobox proper) isn't a good idea.  My suggestion is to reduce the number of entries that appear in the table of contents.  The most straightforward way of doing this is to remove subsections, and replace the subsection headings with larger or bold text.  That keeps the appearance of subsections but removes unnecessary entries in the TOC.  If this sounds like a plan, I'll do it.  Cheers, --Plumbago 17:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm in favour of leaving the subsections as they are. I don't think the TOC is too big or cluttered. Isn't the use of subsections in this article exactly the intended use of subsections? Qutezuce 20:52, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh the use of subsections is fine.  I was just thinking that the TOC's possibly got too many of them.  The section on "Successors" has got a lot of little subsections in it that might be combined somewhat (or handled as I suggest above).  Anyway, as there appears to be an ongoing war in this particular section re: ports of DN3D, I'll wait a bit before changing anything.  --Plumbago 09:47, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infoboxes 

message: Does copyright prevent the distribution of screenshots or demos made from particular games of Duke Nukem?  They are images from the game, but do not contain any of the code that generated them.  (I.e. could I record a complete game of Duke Nukem and distribute it as a walkthrough?) oneismany 17:12, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In theory yes for the screenshots. The problem is not the code but the copy of the artworks, under any form. It seems to be tolerated for screenshots though, as screenshots are not commercially exploitable from what I have read on Wiki, so don't worry :-) For demos I would say there is no copyright on it as there are no artworks in a demo and because you are the original creator of the demo. Makes sense? 132.203.107.212 14:23, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Demos & Screenshots
Talk:Francis Darwin

message: I am looking for her whereabouts: interred/cremated, but there appears to be no record anywhere!
Any answers/assistance here please or on the Talk Page of Sir Francis Darwin; Martin Packer
2.30.188.43 (talk) 13:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Martin.  You've been working on this for some time, while not making much progress.  Let's review what we know.  We know she died on August 29 1903, and we know from death records (via http://www.findmypast.co.uk) that she died in Cambridge.  We know from burial records (same source) that she was buried in Girton.  The best bet therefore would be St Andrew's Church in Girton, or any cemetery in Girton.  If you want to find out more about her, then you'll probably have to do some research in the library (both uni and council) looking at the University/college records, her husband's private papers, local newspapers, etc. Barney the barney barney (talk) 23:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

text: Remember too that she is likely to be listed as "Ellen Darwin" or even "Mrs Francis Darwin" rather than under her maiden name. Barney the barney barney (talk) 23:43, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ellen Wordsworth Darwin, nee Crofts : the second wife of Sir [[Francis Darwin]] 

message: Sir Francis Darwin was elected as a Fellow of the Linnean Society on the 2nd of December 1875. This was published as follows: "1875. Dec. 2. Darwin, Francis, M.B. Down, Beckenham, Kent." in: The Linnean Society of London: List of the Linnean Society of London, 1876. [London:] Printed by Taylor and Francis, Red Lion Court, Fleet Street. p.10.
2.30.195.251 (talk) 10:30, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Linnean Society
Talk:Alan Barlow

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 17:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Wladek Zbyszko

message: An anonymous editor created a redirect to Władek Zbyszko and requested that article (with that spelling) on WP:AFC, in order to conform to Polish orthography. This could be handled with a page move (leaving a redirect here), but not knowing whether Zbyszko used the Polish spelling with the "ł" for his first name, I am going to leave it to someone more familiar with the subject to carry out such a page move. --Metropolitan90 20:57, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mark Twain Middle School (Virginia)

message: There should be info about the MT middle school in New York.--70.107.178.77 20:59, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Which state

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. Christopher Parham (talk) 20:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: The main text of the article says 956 students, but the table says 1058. Which one is right? 72.196.226.14 00:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll get the info as soon as possible. --71.163.132.234 21:14, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Only problem is, that's from last year. The charts for this year are not in yet. --71.126.155.85 16:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article contradicts itself...
Talk:Nederland, Colorado

message: Is the population actually 1337? It seems like a reference to l33t speak, but it could just be a coincidence. Flashcry (talk) 06:30, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the sign as you enter town, it's more like 1,900, but I don't have any other source for that figure. Jedikaiti (talk) 22:08, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

message: In keeping with WP:TRIVIA, I have removed the trivia section, but am listing the contents below, in case anyone cares to dig up some sources and integrate them into the article at a later date. Jedikaiti (talk) 22:10, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 
Talk:Duke Nukem 3D/Archive 3

message: The Atomic Edition needed an explanation, as did EDuke (which appeared to have sprung up in 2003 rather than 2000).  I tried to order the various sections in levels of importance, giving PC-related matters preference over console ports, official and commercial products placement over mods, and ports of the game precedence over unreleased or unofficial "successors."
I recommend adding Serious Sam as a successor, even if the enemies are more Doom-like, the physics and commentary are more Duke-like.
Hope you find the additions/cleanup satisfactory.
--Aesire 01:19, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looks great. I would change "Official Addons" title by "Main releases" (then state that Atomic had an add-on), and add 1.3d before Atomic. (order is 1.3d / 1.4 / 1.5 / eDuke32). Ask TX for more. I don't think Serious Sam is too of interest, or just add like one short line about it. 132.203.107.212 04:31, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization 

message: There exists a speedrun of duke3d recorded using the popular jonof port. Should it be mentioned in the article? Just wondering because for instance quake article mentions quake speedrunning and it even has its own article. 83.102.70.100 17:41, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure! Someone posted it a long time ago, then some maniac removed it all instead of improving the article. See log to figure out. Please note Speedrun can only be officialy accepted when done with the original game. That's why the jonof speedrun was rejected by official speedrun web site http://speeddemosarchive.com This is because port may alter the original gameplay. ==> To see if the original gameplay is altered, simply play an original duke dos demo (*.dmo) on the port - not a recorded demo you have just done of course. If it doesn't play correctly or doesn't play at all, then it means the original gameplay was broken in the port. The rational behind this is that the *.dmo records the keypresses only. So for a given sequence of keypresses under the original dos duke3d of the *.dmo file, the port should be able to behave exactly the same way and reproduce the *relative* movements ordered by the *.dmo file. If it does then the old demo will play fine. If the port changed a behavior of the physics, even slightly, then the demo will go like crazy or wrong. 132.203.32.206 21:14, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedrun of Duke Nukem 3D