Talk:Nonsuch Palace

message: Paragraph one states "Nonsuch Palace (SNIP) was completed in 1538." But paragraph five states "Construction had been substantially carried out by 1541, but it took several more years to complete." I lack the expert knowledge to correct it myself.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by JMBryant (talk • contribs) 14:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Date error needs correction

message: In its article Sir Thomas Pride, Wikipedia states that he purchased Nonsuch Palace.  His tenure does not appear in Wikipedia information about ownership of the palace, set out under the heading "Through the Ages".  Given his place in significant events of the time, his ownership adds to the story of the palace.  Something to be updated ? [User: John Pride] 23 February 2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.7.237.56 (talk) 08:22, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Ownership of Nonsuch Palace

message: Barbara, Countess of Castlemaine. She had it demolished from 1682 onwards. -- Is this supported? Why would she demolish a palace? It is thought the palace burnt down, why is this not mentioned? Tubusy 18:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Barbara Villiers dismantled the palace and sold the masonry to pay off her enormous gambling debts  Keith Hazell 21:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

text: John Dent, a borough librarian of Epsom and Ewell, wrote a book, The Quest for Nonsuch, first published in 1962 [2nd ed Hutchinson 1970, ], that provides a great deal of information on the palace and the excavation, including this.  Maybe there was a fire first then sold, can't remember but will try and get the book Keith Hazell 19:45, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The fall of Nonsuch

message: It's a strange name.  The article doesn't say where the name came from.  Might be worth mentioning if anyone knows the etymology.  --Qef (talk) 21:31, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of name

message: Should any reference to this TV series be here? It's just a historical romp with no claim to accuracy. --Ef80 (talk) 19:10, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree.  Removed.Lord Mauleverer (talk) 10:09, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The Tudors'' 

message: Is calling the remains of the palace "ruins" somewhat overstating what can still be seen? There is nothing there except markers placed by recent archeological investigators. I think "ruins" suggests at least some walls or foundations visible to people the public.31.53.188.245 (talk) 20:58, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I'm going to change to "site". GrindtXX (talk) 21:34, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruins 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nonsuch Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20090331024136/http://www.britishlocalhistory.co.uk/community/local-history-wiki-article-KING-HENRYS-LOST-PALACE.aspx to http://www.britishlocalhistory.co.uk/community/local-history-wiki-article-KING-HENRYS-LOST-PALACE.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:53, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified