lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yahya Rahim Safavi

message: So was he born in Isfahan or was he a mohajer from the Caucasus like so many Iranians? The Russian Wiki claims that he was born in the Armenian SSR prior to the Nagorno-Karabakh War, which is totally possible. However, we need sourcing for that. The currently added sources stand behind sentences that claim that he was born in Isfahan to an Iranian Azeri family, but I can't access them through google books. Perhaps someone knows more about all this? Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 20:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born in Isfahan or Armenia 
Template talk:Israel North District

message: Why are regional councils, such as Jezreel Valley Regional Council, not part of this template?
:Because no one has added them yet; feel free to do so. Also, please sign your name. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 16:57, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: oops forgot to sign.  OK I will try to add them.  I was just intimidated because I never edited templates before. nadav 22:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regional Councils
Talk:Mania (satrap)

message: The whole article is based on a simple mistake - the woman in question is not Tania, but Mania, and her story is given in full by Xenophon, Hellenica 3.1.10ff. She has nothing to do with the Middle East, and her family were almost certainly Greek. Since an article for Mania does not exist, an alternative to deletion would be to rename the article after the actual historical figure. Ajcee7 (talk) 14:38, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you referring to Mavia (queen), who is also called Mania? Because she has a separate article. I'll double check Polynaeus regarding Tania and see what I can add. Asarelah (talk) 17:48, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checked it. Apparently her name really is Mania. I'll change it at once. Asarelah (talk) 17:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion?

message: 100% of the information about Mania on this Wikipedia page comes from a couple of nice and easy-to-read pages in Xenophon’s Hellenica (III, 2). Quoting a few sentences from this author would have been smarter than trying a summary of his text and confusing readers with later and partial sources that do not add anything to what Xenophon writes. Shehekan (talk) 20:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unique source
File talk:Snake eating mouse.jpg

message: This snake is eating a rat, not a "mouse". ;-)
It's easily distinguishable because mice have a thin tail and small feet. :-)
:I came here thinking the same thing. It would stand to reason that, since the image title was devised by library staff and not a taxonomist, veterinarian, or other expert, it would be a likely error. I'm changing it to "rat", though I'm no expert either. Matt Gies 20:41, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Brethren: Inside the Supreme Court

message: This book was written by bob woodward and scott armstrong, also why is there no information on scott armstrong on the site at all? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.220.208.236 (talk) 00:43, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  September 2006 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved.  Favonian (talk) 17:08, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The Brethren (Woodward and Armstrong book) →  – Including the subtitle of the book would allow us to replace the current parenthetical disambiguation with natural disambiguation. This move would also be a marginal improvement along WP:CONCISE, reducing the length of the page title by four characters. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 16:44, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 July 2022
Talk:Super Robot Wars Alpha Gaiden

message: Alpha Gaiden also included the final (for now) appearance of the Masoukishin Banpresto Originals other then the Cybuster, Granzon, Neo Granzon, Valcione and Valcione R. This may have been due to the lawsuit that followed the release of the game, where the company Winkisoft (sic) tried to sue Banpresto for using the Masoukishin characters. Following the lawsuit, none of the characters who first appeared in Winkisoft games have ever been used.
Can someone please confirm this with an actual source?  It sounds like conjecture or rumor and not truth. Maikeru 00:48, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuit...? 

message: Aeon genesis have released an unoficial translation which covers everything but the ingame mech and pilot database. Maybe we should include this information in the main article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.49.196.25 (talk) 02:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and added a line about it and linked to the AGTP website. If anyone disagrees with it in any way, they are welcome to edit it, relocate it, or remove it, but please comment here why you did or I might reverse the change if I don't agree. -75.182.24.129 (talk) 04:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: Removing the pictures in the article for now, they are badly placed and make the article longer than necessary.
right|thumb|Ginga Senpuu Braiger, making its debut here in Banpresto`s Super Robot Wars Alpha Gaiden game on the Playstation console. 
right|thumb|Dan-kuu-koga-ken, Dancouga`s finisher or "Hissatsu" move, (screenshot) taken from one of the chapters in Banpresto's Super Robot Taisen Alpha Gaiden game. 
right|thumb|Getter Robo, one of the three famous franchises that is the foundation of a typical Super Robot Taisen game. The other two are Gundam (Amuro Ray) and Mazinger Z (Kouji Kabuto).
Kraker2k (talk) 18:49, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the pictures
Talk:The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II: The Rise of the Witch-king

message: It seems that there will be an eighth faction as well. If you look closely in the "Shade of the wolf" Image in this article, the swordsmen and archers seem to have different style armor than that of the men of the west or the elves. It looks similar to the last alliance. I wouldn't be surprised... the sprites already exist from the intro to the first BFME, and if this is a thousand or so years in the past, then they would fit into the cannon. (Despite being far removed from the second age
Also, the games from EA have traditionally had two different campaigns... if there is an Evil one. Thus, there would likely be a good campaign as well.
According to Tolken lore, (and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witch-king_of_Angmar) the witch king was defeated by a joint effort by men end elves. Perhaps this new camping will have a "Full cycle" storyline, instead of the two separate timelines seen in the previous BFME games.
AFAIK this "eighth faction" is Arnor, but only available as an opponent in the bad campaign. Arnor is an "older MotW".
:How about using a colon rather than a little dash? Uthanc 08:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2006

message: I don't think this article should be categorized as Computer and video games with limited editions since there is no existing Collector's Edition, Limited Edition, or Special Edition related to it. The main game (The Lord of the Rings: The Battle for Middle-earth II) has a Collector's Edition, but it does not imply that this expansion pack has also its own Collector's Edition. Darth Narutorious 15:29, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computer and video games with limited editions 

message: I dropped a tag because gameplay needs to be in a prose format, the missions should not have that many subsections, and characters should probably go.--Clyde (talk) 20:19, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: Anyone want to write about the original stuff this game has (probably 90% of it)? Uthanc 17:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Tolkien-derived stuff 

message: The first sentence under gameplay changes is false. EA are probably not going to patch this game again, and are definitely not adding a new faction.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.137.199.97 (talk) 22:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  arnor in 2.02 

message: Is the information in the sub section for Karsh really necessary? I don't see how describing how his performance on a -95% handicap and his leveling speed is contributing to the article.Alexander Le Fey (talk) 21:47, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karsh 

message: The redirect The rise fo the witch king has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  1234qwer1234qwer4 21:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:The rise fo the witch king]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:1987 Oceania Club Championship

message: This page was created to fill in the main gap in the Oceania Club Championships template. Credit must go to Markus Kobler and Andre Zlotkowski, with additional info from Andrew Howe, who originally amassed the information on this site. Blackmissionary 00:52, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes and Credit

message: I've re-added the qualifying tournament into this page. My reasoning for this is twofold. The first reason is that it is only speculated that these matches never took place, and the source seems to stem from an internet forum. Subsequently, my second reason is that the OFC's own websites lists the third and fourth placed teams, and these both build the case that these matches did take place, as their website mirrors the original text from the RSSSF's page, prior to their edit (which was only editted due to someone linking them to the forum where the lack of information was speculated to mean this never took place).
I do believe that the OFC is a far more trustworthy source, seeing as it is their own website's word, against the speculative word of people on an internet forum. J man708 (talk) 05:31, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Any link to that forum? -Koppapa (talk) 21:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qualifying Tournament 

message: I just found a full video of the second half of the final on youtube. There are some hints maybe:
At 34:58 - "wellington themselves were involved in a final on friday night which was quite a bruising affair in fact patterson their coach couldn't name their team until just before the kickoff because they flew here on saturday with a few injuries from that friday night encounter final incidentally they won by three goals to nil"
Comment : So Wellington played two days before the final some match (not in Australia) and won 3-0. This could not have been the semi-final which is mentioned here. With the timeframe of 6-15 March it's strange, how the semi-final would have fit in.
At 50:17: "adelaide city team the team who last year became the australian champions and their second trophy now within seven days they won the import cup on wednesday night here in adelaide beat in adelaide hellish 2-1"
Comment : So Adelaide played a week before some other final. Strange, but maybe possible. -Koppapa (talk) 21:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: decoding the commentary, they played Adelaide Hellas in the Ampol Cup, which was a state-based knockout cup. Hack (talk) 14:13, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was this more than the final?
Talk:Azuma Kagami

message: The source (a journal called Sino-Japanese Studies) seems legit, but the topic of the article seems to be a minor footnote to history, not (as this article currently claims) "a valuable introduction to Japan and its culture". At the moment a full section of this article is devoted to the discussion of an obscure Chinese work from the 19th century that gets no GBooks or GScholar hits. I think at most this should get a sentence's mention and that's it.
Another significant problem is that the article's only source appears to be the article by Feng and Wang. There's nothing wrong with it (again, it seems legit), but that article is primarily discussing an obscure, non-notable aspect of the text's history and so seems inappropriate. If we remove the Japanese Wikipedia source (and I plan to in a moment) and Nussbaum (I won't, because in this case he is only being used for the uncontroversial statement that the Azuma Kagami is a historical chronicle), we're left with four references to the National Archives and fourteen references to Feng and Wang.
Any ideas?
Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 01:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Weng Guangping story notable?
Talk:Fūma Kotarō

message: Death and Later Life...
I noticed it only ends where he killed Hanzo. Why?
*Historically, He and the entire Fuuma clan died during the siege of Odawara with their employers, the Hojo. The bit of him killing Hanzo is fictitious legend. Both men never even knew one another.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.0.103.17 (talk) 12:01, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I have only ever seen this name as Kazama in Japanese texts. Does anyone know why is it Fuma here? Is there a source for this reading? I'm thinking of moving this page to Kazama Kotarō, which as far as I can ascertain is the correct reading. Is there any compelling reason not to do so? Spventi 06:27, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuma or Kazama
Talk:List of political parties in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but the procedure outlined at WP:RM#How to request a page move did not appear to be followed, and consensus could not be determined. Please request a move again with proper procedure if there is still a desire for the page to be moved. Thank you for your time! -- tariqabjotu 01:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move Request 
Talk:Yahoel

message: Is this another spelling of Yahoel of the "Apocalypse of Abraham"? AnonMoos 01:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm assuming at the time this article was under the name "Jehoel". I'm finding this in dictionaries of angels, so far not in RS's, but it does appear to be a variant, along with the trivial Jahoel. It would be good if we could verify. — kwami (talk) 00:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Controlled-Demolition Theory (9/11 Conspiracy Theory)

message: In what way is this a PoV fork? This is not a POV fork; this is an attempt to make the initial article smaller. I have no issue with the editing of the main page; people claiming POV fork need to go look. This is exactly what was in the main article, with some minor editing to make it read better. The reason for the subarticle is that the initial article was far too long. I was being bold and making a subarticle page in order to make that article far smaller. Look at what is actually written before accusing someone of POV forking.
As for the claims that 9/11 conspiracy theories is too large - it is. But it is extremely well sourced and is quite relevant; according to polls more people disbelieve the official account of 9/11 than Evolution. How many pages does Creationism get? This should be treated the same way. It can be cut down a bit, but after looking at it a lot of it is important (in as far as it is a view held by a large number of people) and should remain - it is, after all, a page about conspiracy theories, not about what actually happened. Given people have written numerous books and documentaries on the subject, it is relevant. It is digital space, it is relevant, and there's nothing wrong with having five articles about various 9/11 conspiracy theories if they warrant the space - in fact, I suspect you'll end up with no more than 4-5 of them. If you want to try and cut down 9/11 conspiracy theories, please find a way to do so. I think this is the best way of making that page more concise without losing information. Titanium Dragon 05:51, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Another analogy: suppose the controversy over the "unofficial" Bond-film Never Say Never Again grew to fill most of the article on James Bond, with all arguments and counter-arguments listed. Surely this material would be moved the article on the film (which already exists)? This would not be a POV fork (since all the views would be transferred in the move) but simply a way of keeping the Bond article tidy. In the case of the WTC, there are so many competing ideas within the CT community that the basic idea is pretty much lost. Moreover, the WTC issue is not central to all CTs, and very little depends on all the details (about which most CT'ers remain open minded).--Thomas Basboll 10:00, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV Fork
Talk:This Is Love

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but the procedure outlined at WP:RM#How to request a page move did not appear to be followed, and consensus could not be determined. Please request a move again with proper procedure if there is still a desire for the page to be moved. Thank you for your time! -- tariqabjotu 01:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move Request
Talk:Video modulation

message: Content is OK - i just tended to a little grammar.Gustav Rheinholdt 01:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I expanded this to an article.  Now it needs some polishing and sources.  This should not be any more complex than it already is.  Deeper information, like what "NTSC" is, and what "frequency spectrum" is, should be other articles.  Links to these other articles, wherever they are, are needed. Ohgddfp (talk) 02:19, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded to an article - Needs polishing 

message: "The picture above can more directly explain how the shape is changed"? What picture above? There are no images in the article. Was there an image that got removed or was this taken from a source that had a reference image to go along with it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.46.198.207 (talk) 03:40, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing image
Talk:End of the Line

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but the procedure outlined at WP:RM#How to request a page move did not appear to be followed, and consensus could not be determined. Please request a move again with proper procedure if there is still a desire for the page to be moved. Thank you for your time! -- tariqabjotu 01:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move Request
Talk:Head-Royce School

message: Why are some sports called "boys'/girls'" and others called "Men's/Women's"? Mipchunk 01:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: High school-only sports are Men's/Women's and Middle school sports are boys/girls. --Yarnalgo 23:16, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Athletics

message: The only images on this page are graphics of the mascot and the logo. If anyone has or can take photographs of the school, please add them to the article. — Emiellaiendiay 22:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Might swing by the school some time next week. Where should it go? bluemonq 00:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Taking photos of children at school should be fun to explain to the Oakland police - good luck with that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.77.197.162 (talk) 23:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Last time I checked, there weren't any issues of taking a photograph of buildings. bluemonq (talk) 02:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I work for the architect of the MasterPlan buildings, so I've taken quite a few images. I added a couple, but let me know if there's anything else you'd all like to see here  Nomadic.intelligentsia (talk) 18:38, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs photos
Talk:Central Bucks High School South

message: I think that a list of school actives are warranted because CB South has many clubs that are unique to it, and also the school plays are notable public events for the local community. Also Central Bucks High School East aslo has a list of school activities. 
Tommyhetrick (talk) 18:21, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: School Activities

message: who ever wrote that article has not even gotten the name of the school correct.
:Cite specific cases in which former East students got in fights with former West students. I'm also pretty sure that no Elementary schools were broken up over the change, or even middle schools for that matter. --LastDropOfSanity 17:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?
Talk:Zonians

message: The dates used in this article are wrong.  
The Panama Canal Zone was abolished in 1979 (two years after the signing of the 1977 Panama Canal Treaties).  
For the next 20 years (1979-1999), the territories of the former Canal Zone became officialy known as "Reverted Areas of the Panama Canal".
So, the official dates of the Panama Canal Zone would be 1903-1979.
----
The changeover was gradual, however, and while the Panama Canal Zone proper shrank in size - geographically and in terms of resources - every year, the Zone itself continued to exist as a legal entity until the time of the final handover ceremony in 1999.
I have reverted the section.
Mark Shaw 16:46, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pamela Bjorkman

message: I support the proposed merge. Jlittlet 01:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- HornandsoccerTalk 23:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 March 21#Category:Missing middle or first names, :Category:Missing middle or first names has been added to this talk page.—DomBot / ChiDom talk 09:12, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add maintenance category
Talk:Confederate Memorial State Historic Site

message: This is the only image of the site I could find on Commons. As the most (in)famous interment he probably deserves a mention. I visited last year and took some pictures of the lion sculpture and chapel, but apparently forgot to upload them and they’ve since misplaced. I will keep looking. Grey Wanderer (talk) 18:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: - I've manually changed back your change in the inscription of "IN MEMORIAM -- OUR CONFEDERATE DEAD" to one with an endash back to the two hypens version.  The cited source uses two hyphens, so source-text integrity is probably a bigger priority than MOS:DASH here. Hog Farm  Talk 15:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two hypens vs endash in the monument inscription
Talk:County Trunk Highways (Wisconsin)

message: The article gives an example where County P and County W run concurrently and would be referred to as County PW.  I believe that's incorrect, and both colloquially and from a signage standpoint, one would refer to the highway as either or mention both separately. Mercer5089 (talk) 19:42, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concurrencies
Talk:Second Avenue station

message: Anybody have an idea why on Google Maps it shows up as Second Ave - Lower East Side - 2nd Ave? As the current name now for the station is just Second Ave.--iGeMiNix/What's up?/My Stuff 03:30, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Acps110 has sent a complaint to Google but hasn't been fixed yet. —Gfoley4 | Wanna chat? 16:51, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Earth/Maps 