lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Saint Tail characters

message: I question the need to have the "Character dub names" listed for languages besides English. This is the English Wikipedia, and I think continually adding information for other languages defeats the purpose of having multiple language versions of Wikipedia. I think all of these others should go on the respective language versions of this page. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't think of a need to list dub names other than when the names themselves give weight to the article. I can think of an instance where noting names in other languages is applicable. On List of characters from Ojamajo Doremi the Italian names are mentioned. Each of the girls' names in Italian are also musical terms and music is an important attribute of that series. --Squilibob 04:37, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: List the Italian names under a trivia heading on the main article.  We talk about the Japanese names because this is a work from Japan, and the English dub names because this is the English wikipedia. This... is just insane... it makes my head hurt.. I removed it.. the voices don't stop.. -- Ned Scott 05:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I forgot to notice before you removed it, but if there were any characters listed in the table that were not on the page, I think we should still list them on this page (just not with 10 different language formats). ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:26, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm the one who put most of it on the page.  I have no problem with it being removed. --Lesoria 04:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Multi-language

message: I've been reading the anime/manga project's article assessment section, and it says "Name this page List of characters in (series) if it is just a list, or Characters in (series) if it contains actual information on the characters."  Anyone against me moving List of characters in Saint Tail to Characters in Saint Tail to comply? --Lesoria 04:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move to "Characters in Saint Tail"?
Talk:Dark Water (2002 film)

message: I've restored the full plot detail removed by another editor with the justification that it would spoil the end for those viewing the 2005 remake. This article does not exist to serve as a promotion for the as-yet-unreleased 2005 remake, therefore it is inappropriate to remove critical plot details. Those who do not wish to have the ending spoilt should take heed of the prominently displayed plot spoiler warning, as with any of our other film and literature articles. --Centauri 00:41, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it does not, but while that is not the case, I have yet to see a single article using a SPOILER warning where the entire plot of the film was given away.  I honestly think it would be best for the section to be removed at least until the release of the movie.--Mitsukai 01:58, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The entire plot description is given using names like "the woman" and "the child".  Do these characters not have names?  If so, I think this should be noted somewhere.  Otherwise, it would be nice if names were added to the description. 67.166.242.232 01:34, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names? 

message: I used the cast information from IMDB, let me know if it's not a reliable source. Nidamaya (talk) 20:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft/Archive 4

message: Could we remove the word "characteristics" from the first subheading?  If it's not necessary for "Performance," then it's not needed for "General." ✈ James C. 06:06, 2005 May 1 (UTC)
(sorry if this is wrong talk page for this sort of thing... i'm a bit confused by the WikiProject Aircraft pages)
:I think it's more the fact that you'll talk about, say, a plane's performance - and that word means something pretty widely understood. You don't really hear someone talk about a plane's general, though. If anything was to be removed, it actually ought to be the 'general'. But overall, I think it's fine, unless, of course, you were talking about removing the 'general' in the first place and I misunderstood. -eric ✈ 06:11, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  aero-stats inline specs 

message: Hi all, I've been working on the Edwards Air Force Base article with the goal of it eventually becoming a FAC. Its almost there now so I'm getting ready to submit it to peer review. Before I do that, I thought I'd solicit the input of the aircraft and airport wikiprojects, as these both probably have a vested interest in the shape of this article. I'd appreciate any help with the article proper, but if you don't have time and notice something missing, I've created a todo list on the talk page as well. Thanks, -Lommer | talk 18:38, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edwards Air Force Base
Talk:DeviantArt/Archive 1

message: :"In late 2004, advertisements were introduced on the userpages of non-subscribing members."
This is not really accurate - the ads are only visible to non-subscribers, and non-subs have always had ads...so all that can really be said is "another ad was introduced". --disastrophe 18:42, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: I hate to say this, but this page is a mess. While I did contribute several POV parts to this article earlier on, I'm seeing some form of hissy fit now happening between those who are pro- and anti-deviantart in the history page and to be frank, it's getting ridiculous. Once it would be all from the POV of users who are upset with deviantart policies; then everything would be removed and rewritten from the POV of someone who supports it. I think the most obvious I've seen is under the topic deviantART as a corporation - I was just editing the part about the search function being removed, and found that it was rewritten in such a way that it lost the meaning of the original line, and now makes absolutely no sense why it was ever pointed out. There's also one huge chunk in "Ethical Concerns" which, if viewed from an outsider's POV, doesn't seem to bear relevance to anything unless you read the history pages (someone else has previously written an angry point on deviantart's banning policy). 
This just looks like some back-and-forth online fighting with people rewriting over others' points, and that is just making the article less about deviantart but more about the online fanfight it causes. Personally I don't think I'm going to do the cleanup because I was responsible for some POV stuff, but I suggest you all calm down and clear this article up. --Grumpyhan 17:26, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup Required

message: I just noticed this section had been added. I don't get it. Most online communities out there can ban members for breaking policy. What makes deviantART so special? If no one replies, I am going to remove that addition. Ambush Commander 20:59, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
: I checked the history and it turns out that the user Dxd is replacing huge chunks of text with the "banishment from the community" paragraph, which is exactly the kind of behaviour I'm talking about when I mention how this whole page is a mess because people keep making things nonsensical and unnecessary because it doesn't fit their POV (you are supposed to rectify errors within the information, not completely eradicate the whole thing and deny its existence!). There is no good reasoning behind the removal of "Ethical and Legal concerns", and while it may be generally confusing it should be reworded rather than replaced with how deviantart bans people - to which I agree with Ambush Commander has no reason to be in this article. (Dxd, I don't know if you read this part of wikipedia but your edits are very close to becoming vandalism. Can you please try not to remove huge paragraphs, or at least practise some restrain to not write DA-positive POV parts?) -Grumpyhan 05:12, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banishment from the Community
Talk:2005 Boston Red Sox season

message: There is no need to delete/modify the game log.  I will be working on it. jj137Talk 21:38, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Really?  Cause - uh, doesn't look so hot.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GambitMG (talk • contribs) 02:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game log
Talk:Class of 9/11

message: May 28, 2005 article - http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050528/ap_on_re_us/west_point_graduation
Dead link: Yahoo news isn't kept.
The NYPD class which started in the Academy on July 3, 2001 is also referred to as the Class of 9/11
Sphyrna 01:10, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If “Class of 9/11” refers to the graduating classes of 2005 and 2002, then why is Emily Perez, who graduated in 2001, known as the first member of the class to pass away? MhcL947 (talk) 08:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emily Perez?
Talk:Saharan rock art

message: i get the impression this article was not originally in english - i think it needs proofreading. pauli 01:05, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bergmann

message: "Isn't the name "Bergmann" Jewish and not Swedish?  That's what I have always heard."
Well, my name is Bergman, and im from sweden, and im not jewish (and no relatives for atleast a couple of generations back)     //Emil Bergman
Translating it directly from Swedish to English "Bergman" means "mountain man" not "man of the mountain". if you say "man of the mountain" you would directly mean man of one certain mountain (that he owns, possess, inhabits or whatever)and Bergman doesnt mean that.
I've known Jewish and non-Jewish Bergmanns and Bergmans. Most of the Jewish Bergmanns I have met are of German-Jewish ancestry.--Andrewmb 02:40, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The spelling of man is man is "man" and "mann" in Swedish and German, respectively. Autharitus (talk) 16:44, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

text: It's not a jewish name. Of course there might be jews with this last name but it is not a jewish last name. It is a German last name. And i rare cases may be swedish in origin. It is much more likely that Swedes named Bergman/Bergmann are of partial German origin due to immigration. Interestingly the Germans migrating to sweden during the ages often were miners, so basically Bergmänner. 178.24.247.88 (talk) 06:22, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Metallurgical Laboratory

message: Wasn't the reactor at Columbia College, south of Chicago? I had heard that it was a full melt-down. It should have reached the center of the Earth, by now; eating its way through matter.216.215.40.65 (talk) 01:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Columbia College 

message: This article mentions the Metallurgical Project five times but never explains it. What is it? --2600:380:5557:1883:8875:A0E6:CEAF:F4C0 (talk) 22:06, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Added an explanation. Hawkeye7 (talk) 01:22, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the Metallurgical Project 

message: :I have a couple of issues, things wondered about, so maybe someone can enlighten me. I ran across the "featured article" Chicago Pile-1 so decided to check out Chicago Pile-2. This dumped me back (redirected) to Chicago Pile-1#Later operation. I checked out Chicago Pile-3 (stub-class), that led to Experimental Breeder Reactor I (Chicago Pile-4), and Chicago Pile-5 through the "See also" section. It seems a better connection could be established.
:This featured article gave me a few pauses. When I read it I first noticed some confusion. It went from the "Reactor development" section and the subsections of Chicago Pile-1, Pile-2, and Pile-3, before getting into the "Production piles" subsection. That seems strange as it would appear this would be at the beginning since it discusses elements regarding the building of the "Piles". Maybe I am just not getting it but I would think construction concepts (say, homogeneous versus heterogeneous) would be placed ahead of construction details of "Piles". 
:I suppose my main concern is a disconnect between these initial "Piles" and the tying in of related articles. It seems this article is the "parent article", at least concerning the elements that sprung from it, as presented by "main article" in the "Chicago" subsection of Manhattan Project.    
:The sixth paragraph of Nuclear reactor touches on Chicago Pile-1 then the seventh paragraph drops in the Manhattan Project which can also be found in the Nuclear fission history subsection.
:Anyway, from a readers point of view (not an "expert") it could be a little better presented. Otr500 (talk) 14:47, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what your question is about the -5 piles.  But -1/2 and -3 were designed/built by the Met Lab, while -4 and -5, by Argonne National Laboratory.  Although there is considerable overlap between the two: the Met Lab was a UChicago laboratory that did government contract work, Argonne is the primary successor to the Met Lab but it is a government lab, generally run by UChicago.  At any rate  did the work on this article perhaps he can help you.  Alanscottwalker (talk) 18:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions
Talk:Election stock market

message: The Iowa Election Market has been active since at least the mid 80's. Yes, it's at least 20 years old and to my knowledge significantly older than any other prediction market out there. However, to put this in context, UK bookies have been in business probably for the past three or four centuries and outcomes of elections probably have been long part of their business. - KarlHallowell 01:33, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Damn Yankees (band)

message: The term "American" to refer to United States citizens is colloquial. Since 1507, when German geographer Martin Waldseemüller coined the word "America", it has been the name of the whole continent, from Canada to Argentina. No official US government or UN documents refer to the USA as simply "America". "American band" might as well refer to Brazilian or Mexican bands. The use of colloquial terms should be discouraged in a serious encyclopedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.47.183.193 (talk) 03:28, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colloquial Vocabulary 

message: As of January 17, 2011, the RIAA Gold and Platinum Searchable Database shows that Don't Treat has only been certified Gold, so I fixed the inaccuracy on the Damn Yankees page which said it was certified Platinum.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.64.108.239 (talk) 19:25, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't Tread 

message: Damn Yankees was a classic rock band, never glam metal, end of the world!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MATHEUS HS (talk • contribs) 17:06, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please stay calm. We are talking about music, but we are talking about it on Wikipedia. You are not taking this into consideration. If you want to talk about feelings and emotions, I'm sorry but this is the wrong place. Wikipedia is not about feelings. Read its policies. Coming to your source, I'm not sure it is reliable, but even if it is the most reliable source on the internet, it does not indicate that allmusic is unreliable. Therefore, allmusic remains a valid source and glam metal will be included as a genre. You have now been reverting lots of times, and still you have not provided a valid reason for removing glam metal from the genres. You should stop doing this, it has gone too far. Keep in mind you are already in a dispute regarding Giant. Either you show in a clear way they were NOT glam metal, or allmusic prevails since it is a source. FateForger (talk) 17:54, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Again, as above. Merely driving by the article as an IP and reverting the changes will not stand as an alternative to reliable sources and consensus, and will probably lead to this article being protected. Please continue this discussion, Matheus, and abide by consensus. Dayewalker (talk) 02:51, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Damn Yankees Glam?

message: Under history, referring to "Dont' Tread", it states "Although the second release was not as successful as the first album, it contained a few minor hits...". How are we defining "minor hits"? Seems like a biased word. The singles "Don't Tread", "Mister Please", and "Where You Goin' Now" were 3, 3, and 6 on the Mainstream Rock Tracks (see Don't Tread's wikipage). So, does a song have to be a 1 or a 2 to be a major hit? Most bands would kill to have a top 10 hit.
Therefore, removing the biased language. FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 18:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Hits ?
Talk:Unit prefix

message: The citation for this is a personal website that claims it without giving a source. I can't find evidence of it. Does anyone have a RS (ideally BIPM) for this? 128.12.245.10 (talk) 08:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The CGPM has decided to extend this z–y backwards through the alphabet" 

message: In this page i came across this: The initial letters were changed because s and h, from previously proposed ascending hepta and descending septo, were already used as SI units and prefixes (in German, septo would be pronounced as English zepto), and because the o of octa/octo could be confused with zero. I checked the SI prefixes and none have the letter S as their symbol. Also the article clearly states: or if letters such as S and T, which are already in use as SI units or prefixes, will again be skipped. Are there any SI prefixes using the letter S as their symbol? Could someone tell me about this? Thanks! 24.150.136.68 (talk) 00:45, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: S, s, and H are SI units, while hour is an accepted non-SI unit. Adding them as prefixes would create confusion. Jeblad (talk) 19:54, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  S used as an SI prefix? 

message: Although these old speculations are now about to be overtaken, the x and v prefixes did make it into Greg Egan's Schild's Ladder with its "vendeks" and "xennobes". Shame about the w, though. :) Double sharp (talk) 20:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  x, w, v prefixes 

message: The redirect Una (prefix) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Una (prefix)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:DoS

message: * DoS with a lowercase 'o' should not be redirected to DOS (disambig)! Denial of Service is the only thing that uses to be written with a lowercase 'o'.
::I had made it clear in DOS (disambiguation) which things are called DOS and which things are called DoS but this got removed, so I reinserted that. Denial of Service is not the only thing called DoS. The point of having disambiguation for DOS, DoS and dos in one place is that people who might not know the exact capitalisation for the word they are trying to find, would still be able to find if they reach that disambig page. BTW I'm not sure everyone in the community tolerates using "four-letter words" in the edit summary, so it'd be better if you kept a bit cooler. Thanks! -- Paddu 20:28, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alaska Airlines

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Alaska Airlines picketing incident and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 2#Alaska Airlines picketing incident until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:15, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Alaska Airlines picketing incident" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: That image has always struck me as being out-of-place, like an old advertisement that somebody forgot to take down, like a Pepsi machine featuring The Phantom Menace. Does its presence really enhance this page? BOTTO (T•C) 21:08, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to WP:BOLDly remove it if you think it doesn't enhance the page (I've no strong opinion either way), but I'll note that the image itself is in the public domain because it's below the threshold of originality, so the image doesn't seem to be problematic from an WP:NFCC standpoint. Mz7 (talk) 20:12, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alaska Air Mileage Plan image 

message: What do we think about changing Eskimo to Inuit here? Vitalen1 (talk) 01:37, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Vitalen1, I would not recommend it.  The Iñupiat of Alaska are not Inuit speakers, speaking the Iñupiaq language instead.  Name Omitted (talk) 03:08, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Alaska Airlines’ quasi-official name for the logo is “the Eskimo” so it would feel strange to not use the name at least once. Beyond that, if repeated use doesn’t feel right, might I recommend the more generic Alaska Native. RickyCourtney (talk) 04:23, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage of the Word Eskimo 

message: These need to be split into three sections because of Alaska mainline Alaska horizon and Alaska SkyWest. Lucthedog2 (talk) 01:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alaska Destination Tables
Talk:Virginia State Route 236

message: There is an article on Wikipedia titled Little River Turnpike which covers this information, as well as the history of this road. I believe the two articles should be merged.
Oh, the above was written by me, BTW -- I forgot my login had timed out. -- SterlingNorth 02:46, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Each article contains information that is absent from the other article.  Whoever merges the articles, please take care that no pertinent information is lost.  Thanks.  216.214.103.34 16:25, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:I Will Always Love You

message: https://www.npr.org/2021/08/02/1023889920/dolly-parton-invested-royalties-from-a-whitney-houston-cover-in-a-black-communit
There are several sources like that one. KimYunmi (talk) 22:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add section or part? Dolly Parton donated her share of the royalties from Whitney Huston's cover to the Black community quietly. 

message: Per WP:NCOVER, WP:TOOLONG, and Without You (Mariah Carey recording), perhaps the Whitney Houston cover recording should be split into I Will Always Love You (Whitney Houston recording). George Ho (talk) 11:20, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal
Talk:Little River Turnpike

message: There is an article in Wikipedia titled Virginia State Highway 236 which also covers this information, though there is less information in that article. I believe the information in this article should merge into that one.
Oh, the above was written by me, BTW -- I forgot my login had timed out. -- SterlingNorth 02:46, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Each article contains information that is absent from the other article.  Whoever merges the articles, please take care that no pertinent information is lost.  Thanks.  216.214.103.34 16:24, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:List of American houses

message: What criterion is being used to add something to this list?
Courtland 02:48, 2005 May 29 (UTC)
I suppose it's a matter of personal opinion--so the larger question is the criterion for what to remove, as probably there will be interest in promoting certain places, particularly if envisioned as vistor destinations.
Phmalo 16:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please add more houses.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6001:E790:5800:11C:52E5:2265:8F39 (talk) 05:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add American Gothic House 

message: Please join us on 13 December 2020, 12:00-14:00 EST, as we update and improve articles in Wikipedia related to housing in the United States of America. Sign up here. -- M2545 (talk) 11:22, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invitation to [[Wikipedia:Meetup/US_housing/December_2020|US Housing Edit-a-thon]]