Talk:Ontario's Drive Clean

message: If I wanted to read an editorial, I would have gone elsewhere.  This article debases what Wiki is about.  
 
When I read this page, I can hear a giant axe grinding.  I've since edited it to leave it a little less one-sided, and to include other pertinent information. --—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ivandenisovitch (talk • contribs) 
Obviously the status-quo with Drive Clean is not working.  Only by pointing out the flaws in this program can we effect positive change.  Drive Clean is a politically-motivated revenue-generating program, and is clearly not fulfilling the goals of Ontario with respect to reducing air pollution.  It is also unfair to operators of older vehicles. --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.112.51.10 (talk • contribs) 
While you may be right, that discussion has NO PLACE on the Wikipedia. Please state ONLY the facts, and cite your sources. This article is ridiculously POV, and needs quite a bit of revision. --74.115.11.144 15:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

message: When I look at this article I see a one sided argument that has no place on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a place for personal opinion it is a place for information. Some of the information about the flaws is still important but a sentence like the program gives people a false sense of security is completely unnecessary as it is a personal opinion. Instead of vandalizing Wikipedia improvements need to be made. Xtreme racer 03:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is horrible

message: When I looked further at this article it is clear that the article isn't written in a neutral tone for Wikipedia or a tone appropriate for Wikipedia. It needs to be improved so any bias and problems with tone are fixed, especially the sentence "Diverting Provincial funds towards existing public transit networks would have easily prevented damaging fare increases seen in Toronto from the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) in recent years." This sentence and most of the article suffer from this problem. I am hoping that some responsible, and unbiased editors will improve this article so the personal opinions of users will be eliminated from this article so it will finally be up to standards. Xtreme racer 00:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:42, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV template without ongoing discussion per [[Template:POV]] instructions