lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Polish coats of arms

message: Partial picture and some interesting info found at . --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 09:46, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staryko&#324; or Stary Ko&#324; 

message: Should this be added to the list?  --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 00:07, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: W zasadzie wszystkie herby, ale ich jest tysiace... Staralem sie wstawic narazie najwazniejsze.--Emax 00:50, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boduła herb? 

message: I guess they should have a separate category and list. Any ides for naming? I guess gallery could go to commons or just be at :Category:Polish cities coat of arms images, with a :Category:Polish cities coats of arms category (based on current :Category:Polish coat of arms images and :Category:Polish coats of arms)?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 06:00, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cities coats of arms
Talk:Electron gun

message: What would happen if one were to cut open a CR or Röntgen tube, turn on the electron beam at normal power, and then point it at various objects?  Could, say, a TV be turned into a weapon?  This concerns working the tube in and out air, as after letting the air through a large hole in the tube first or cutting only picoscopic holes in the tube to let electrons through but not molecules. lysdexia 10:57, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: the electron gun idea is not dead yet,
each pixel is constituted by (usually) 3 subpixels: a.reb, b.green. c.blue.
The quantum electron gun pixel, controls the flow of electrons of the three subpixels,
each electron has a different speed according to the light beam is purposed to generate while crushing on phosphorus atoms.
pixel electron guns cannot accelerate electrons sufficiently yet except if the pixels become very large.
That technology can work for huge monitors - but consumes more energy than other options.
The goal is to make that technology quantum, but that's what LED does already!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.84.216.225 (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  quantum Electron gun pixel monitor
Wikipedia talk:Village pump (miscellaneous)

message: Hi, I’m trying to find my help to a forum to apologise for editing mistakes. Thanks for help. Ema--or (talk) 17:34, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request

message: This is existential and needs to be fixed ASAP. And to be clear this is not solely an issue of link rot, though it largely is, it's fundamental to the legitimacy of the project, handwaving notwithstanding 🙏 Iluvlawyering (talk) 02:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:OFFLINE. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Is this serious? 0xDeadbeef 06:36, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks more like an attempt to stir up controversy. —Kusma (talk) 15:08, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Much as I dislike ad hominem arguments, the clue may be in the account name.  On a practical note, most internet sources which go offline are available on archive sites. Certes (talk) 17:58, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No more footnotes with no link and when link go inactive auto-delete claims.
Talk:Tamasheq languages/to do

message: # Add references.
# Create map.
# Mention the fact that these language cluster is very often called Tuareg (or Touareg) (Leupen 1978, Chaker 1988, Heath in prep., Prasse & Alojaly & Mohamed 2003, Cortade 1969, Prasse 1969, etc.).
# Main article should cover common features of Tuareg; reader should be referred to the individual languages for more details.
Last updated: Mark Dingemanse (talk) 12:04, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Dark Peak

message: I'm surprised to see this listed as a Yorkshire stub (only) - a broad enough definition to the Aire gap (?) might justify this on area grounds, but all the 'interesting territory' (Kinder, Bleaklow, Black Hill) is (since the Cheshire boundary was redrawn) firmly in Derbyshire (OK Black Hill is shared). Linuxlad
*Don't forget that the north eastern Upper Derwent Valley is in South Yorkshire, and the Dark Peak includes the area around Margery Hill, the highest point in S Yorks.  But I agree that there should also be a Derbyshire geo stub note. Warofdreams 11:30, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Yorkshire Stub
Template talk:Infobox German district

message: In case something like :meta:Extended template syntax (see Bugzilla #364) is implemented this template should be merged with Template:Infobox German district noregbez. The variables regierungsbezirk (and additionally region) then should be optional. Some districts also use former regierungsbezirk in case the Regierungsbezirk was recently dissolved. As long as no such feature exists changes in the infobox design need to be made to both templates. andy 11:44, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: The captions to the map image (Map of  highlighting the district ) are not working.  Can somebody fix this?  Gene Nygaard 16:18, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Map captions

message: Is it possible to add a parameter for the coats of arms of the Landkreise ? Dэя-Бøяg - 18:43, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Coats of arms

message: Since there is now a parameter for the coat of arms we might also want to have an opportunity to display the appropriate flag alongside the shield. If nobody objects, I'm going to enable the |image_flag parameter from Infobox settlement for this template. De728631 (talk) 16:21, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag

message: Is it possible to enable the Leader, Leader party and Leadertitle options from the info box settlement? That would allow to mention the Landrat or the Regionalverbandsdirektor (Saarbrücken)--Micge (talk) 10:40, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually a parameter  is already enabled in the template but it hasn't been added to the blank code in the documentation. The automated default title for this position is 'District admin.' which doesn't need to be changed imo. I'm now going to add the 'leader_party' parameter. De728631 (talk) 12:37, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added two alternative parameters that are now also listed in the documentation:  and . 12:57, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the quick fix. --Micge (talk) 14:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leader
Talk:John B. Keane

message: Here's a good source for anyone who wants to do more on the article. Filiocht 12:33, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)
"His son John is a journalist with the Kilkenny People"
"his son, Billy regularly writes a column for the Irish Independent"
Wow!
I hope I'm not breaching any rules here....but you'd think such a relatively important Irish person would have a vastly better article! 
Sarah777 (talk) 19:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:List of reunifications

message: I split up the section on completed reunifications into one section on complete reunifications of divided nation-states and put the other entires on the "unification" processes of Italy and Bulgaria into a section on unification processes. There are significant differences - politcally, historically, and legally between the reunification of countries that once formed a united entity but were eventually divided (post WW2-Germany, Yemen, Vietnam) and the formation or gradual amaligamation of various states to form a new nation (Italy, Imperial Germany, Bulgaria, etc.). After all there is a reason why the (re-) prefix is added to form reunification. I reccomend the current form be maintainted unless somebody has arguments to the contrary. 
--Westee 14:51, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, I was only suspicious of possible vandalism since Poland was initially removed. Sorry for my gut reaction, I'm fine with the distinction. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 12:47, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  unification and reunification! there is a difference. 

message: * Armenian unification (joining Armenia, Nagorno-Karabakh, and Western Armenia)
* Azeri unification (joining Azerbaijan and South Azerbaijan)
If anyone's got any sources on that, I'd be highly interested. —Nightstallion (?) 20:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am the vandal you speak of there is no political motavation for the British Isles to reunite no political party advocates this--Barrytalk 23:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange additions

message: I've given it another go to add this as I feel it is an important potential reunification that was missing. It may be very unlikely, at least in the short to medium term, but it is one reunification I would dearly love to see and I can't be the only one that feels that way. It is a hypothetical reunification so it should be included. YourPTR! (talk) 15:36, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I reworded it due to the fact that ireland is and never was in anyway 'British'. P.S. you are in a minority favouring a reunification of Ireland and Britain, as a proud irishman i hope your vision doesnt come true but i would love to see a United Ireland, but anyway this is a discussion page about improving articles so lets keep it like that. Pathfinder2006 (talk) 00:48, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Reunification
Talk:21 Singles

message: :Image:21 singles.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:21 singles.jpg

message: I added details to the tracklisting, stating which songs are from which albums in this singles collection, using the information I could find on other wikipedia pages. I stuck to the original formatting, though in hindsight it might be better presented as a table. I'll leave that decision to others. --Pipedreambomb (talk) 21:53, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "from <album>" details added
Talk:Ivan Frederick

message: I think Wikipedia should have an article for the concept of pleading guilty. Since this often involves some bargain, so the prosecutor won't ask for a higher sentence. A Wikipedia user outside of the US may be mistaken into believing that the convicted person actually partook in a crime, such as a conspiracy, while this might not have been the case. As here there was no criminal conspiracy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GigaGerard (talk • contribs) 19:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pleaded guilty 

message: *I've removed the lead photo for the time being. from MOS:IMAGELEAD -  Lead images should be natural and appropriate representations of the topic; they should not only illustrate the topic specifically, but also be the type of image used for similar purposes in high-quality reference works, and therefore what our readers will expect to see. Lead images are not required, and not having a lead image may be the best solution if there is no easy representation of the topic. wumbolo ^^^ 16:28, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep image?
Talk:List of U.S. states by highest point

message: *Just created this. It should likely be merged with List of tallest mountains of U.S. states at some point. Radagast 14:44, Oct 22, 2004 (UTC)
*I'll merge it into either that list or List of U.S. states by elevation. Phoenix2 17:51, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
*Done -Ravedave 02:41, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Pedophilia/Archive 1

message: This article is pretty biased towards the point of view of society at large. The point of view of the pedophiles themselves is not represented; some of it is outlined in childlover. Someone should fix this :)
:May I ask you if you think that the article about child abuse should be written from the point of view of abusers? Get-back-world-respect 22:04, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is about pedophilia and not CSA. Anyways both views should be represented. --Moon light shadow 09:35, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Since society represents a better consensus than a webpage the main focus should be on the majority's view. Get-back-world-respect 01:08, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Links that relate to abuse recovery and the sexual victimisation of children do not belong on this page. Pedophilia by itself does not imply any action on the sexual attraction at all. Whether it is a paraphilia or not, pedophilia is not an action in and of itself; therefore it does not have any victims. I am removing once again the links that are already appropriately placed on the child sexual abuse page. Zanthalon 23:30, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The links do not only relate to abuse recovery and sexual victimisation of children. Just read. One focusses on helping pedophiles - about which this article is - to deal with their paraphilia, so this is exactly the right article to have it. Also note that many who were once "loved" by a "childlover" have severe problems with that experience later, so the other link is equally appropriate. Get-back-world-respect 23:43, 11 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The links should be listed only once in the most suitable article. Only links that deal specifically with the therapy of pedophiles are appropriate here. The therapy of victims does not depend on whether the offender was a pedophile or not but on what happend and on the victims' problems. --Moon light shadow 09:43, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The links should be listed where they are helpful. One focusses on helping pedophiles - about which this article is - to deal with their paraphilia, so this is exactly the right article to have it. Get-back-world-respect 01:07, 13 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Bullshit. These articles are not intended to help pedophiles, they are intended to make a good encyclopedia. If you want to help pedophiles, join some community organisation that does it, don't waste your time vandalising Wikipedia articles. Paranoid 16:53, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia policy Wikipedia:No personal attacks, your language is unacceptable. Articles generally have external links helpful in understanding the topic comprehensively. The offer of therapeutical treatment to pedophiles who agree they are in danger to harm themselves as well as others meets that criteria a lot more than links to "childlovers". Get-back-world-respect 17:33, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Difference Between Pedophilia and Child Sexual Abuse
Talk:Fort Worth, Texas

message: Sorry for not being specific at first. While making a map, I realized that Fort Worth was due to the  Southwest of Dallas, and closer to San Antonio, than it was to Dallas, where as Fort Worth is due West of Dallas. The coordinates are fixed now. Thanks!
—68.43.189.205 (talk) 15:09, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The coordinates in this article appear to have been incorrect for some time. I've emended them. Deor (talk) 17:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: I was looking at the climate data and recognized that it’s from 2009. The data has been updated since then. I don’t have time to update it right now, but if someone else wants to update it, the data is available here: https://w2.weather.gov/climate/xmacis.php?wfo=fwd  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:32A0:1FA0:DD74:2A76:8BA5:B9EF (talk) 21:36, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old climate data 

message: Is there any way that someone can edit the map outlined so that it shows all the enclaved cities within Fort Worth? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 01:31, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enclaved municipalities
Talk:Boeing X-37

message: Supposed X-37B uses TUFROC (=Toughened Unipiece Fibrous Oxidation Resistant Ceramic), but is that for the leading edges or the underside generally ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:16, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More about the thermal protection system please 

message: It states that the vehicle is "120% of the X-40". Meanwhile, the X-40 page says that it is a "80% scale model of the X-37"
 While both of these statements may be technically true, in combination, they form a loop.
Should this be fixed? 174.93.14.130 (talk) 20:29, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing frame 

message: The line "It was reported to weigh 48,000 lb (21.6 t), and be 29 feet (8.8 m) long" in the paragraph about the Chinese reusable spaceplane comes from a source which is clearly describing a different spacecraft entirely, a manned capsule as opposed to an unmanned spaceplane. I'd also appreciate some clarification about just which 'knowledgeable commentators' are arguing that the X-37 inspired the nebulously-described Chinese project. 64.50.95.2 (talk) 18:44, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese Reusable Spacecraft 

message: https://spacenews.com/chinas-mystery-reusable-spaceplane-lands-after-276-days-in-orbit/ 69.14.161.85 (talk) 09:26, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  China's spaceplane (X-37b like) 

message: The photo caption says "The sixth X-37B".  Presumably this is in prep for the sixth launch, which I guess would make it vehicle #1 (?)  Someone who knows should clarify.   Odd that these things don't have some more formal designation besides just 1 and 2. Gjxj (talk) 18:18, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, more like 6th launch. The description on the image page lists OTV-6, so 6th mission overall. Thanks, -Fnlayson (talk) 19:23, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  just two? 

message: Is there an explanation somewhere that explains why the engine to not centered but shifted toward the starboard side? Daleshell (talk) 15:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  X-37B engine not centered?
Talk:Riverside (house)

message: "at the time it was considered the grandest and most ambitious house ever built on the island of Manhattan" The fact is, Riverside was the grandest and most ambitious house ever built on the island of Manhattan. If this assessment were in error, all the weaselling inserted would not save the sentence. A neutral point-of-view is never achieved by inserting "considered to be" into a flawed statement. --Wetman 15:56, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Fact?

message: Any available? 76.22.32.86 (talk) 21:18, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Availability is the question.  Other Web sites show photos of the house but if they are still under copyright we need permission.  Jim.henderson (talk) 13:26, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Lolita Lebrón

message: I am not sure this is an accurate description of Lolita Lebrón and the article does not offer any evidence that she considered herself either a socialist or feminist. Margaret Power 21:26, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Look here. --The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 23:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characterizing Lolita Lebrón as a feminist and socialist
Talk:Barenaked for the Holidays

message: A DJ last Christmas played this, and said it was recorded impromptu backstage at the Palace of Auburn Hills in Michigan (which would explain why Sarah cuts off at the end.) Sounds true, does anyone know?
Bouncehoper 02:24, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about Sarah McLachlan song
Talk:Gorni Kramer

message: As explained in the Gorni Kramer main article, this is an odd case of pseudonym: this Italian bandleader was born Kramer (first name) Gorni (family name), then adopted Gorni (first) Kramer (second name) as his stage name. Ary29 17:03, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nemo dat quod non habet

message: Oftentimes Catholic seminarians are mistaken for priests and asked to bless objects.  If he is unable to convince his interlocutor that he is not able to bless things, there has been a longstanding practice among some seminarians to recite "Nemo dat quod non habet, in nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti" over the item, to the great rapture of well-meaning pious persons and the great amusement of those who speak Latin.  I don't know if it's worth incorporating into the article, but it may be worth mentioning if it can be properly sourced. PeterMottola (talk) 12:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Use in the Catholic Church

message: I came across an article with some good information in it: Rethinking the Laws of Good Faith Purchase. It mentions the history of the "open market" rule, how it was not received into American law and its abolition in English law in 1994.
Also see  and  for more information on the "good faith" rule. Count Truthstein (talk) 14:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for expanding this article
Talk:List of organic reactions

message: I have deleted the following link because the name reactions are not provided anymore:
* http://themerckindex.cambridgesoft.com/TheMerckIndex/NameReactions/
I get a 403 Forbidden error when trying to access the following link. For this reason, I have deleted it:
* http://fachschaft.cup.uni-muenchen.de/~schleifi/reaktion/reaction/
-------------
If the links on this page are to be of any use in foreseeable future, I would suggest the authors limit themselves to more general reactions/denominations (such as redox, neutralization, etc...) unless of course they are seriously planning to write all those articles, in which case I bow to their boldness. --Phils 17:09, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should this page also have name reagents? Like Adams Catalsyst PtO2 whicb is on the list now! ChristianB 09:00, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reagents

message: I have a public area where children play in the water. It's reservoir, when filled up, holds 1250gals of water. The water goes through fountains and back to the reservoir so is always recycling.  It's chlorine level needs to stay in between 2 and 3.       What I need to know is..., with this amount of chlorine in it..., would adding 1/2 cup of rubbing alcohol daily, cause any kind of bad effect..., say, irritation to the childrens skin or eyes at all?  
Thank you soooo much!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.175.142.188 (talk) 22:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help... 

message: Look at the articles about name reactions in Chinese Wikipedia. Why don't they translate the names into Chinese? --128.232.251.242 (talk) 10:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name reactions in Chinese Wikipedia

message: The above-mentioned hyperlink leads to "phenols" article, which doesn't have any content regarding the said reaction. Viv73 (talk) 09:09, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dienone phenol rearrangement