lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Circumferential Highway (Nashua)

message: I just expanded the article some more.  Found a great reference:
*Circumferential Highway "White Pages", Nasua Regional Planning Commission, September 17, 2003
However, some newspaper references perhaps would help too.  Nashua Telegraph only allows subscribers to access their archives.  Does anyone know of a good news-archive site that might allows access to some of these articles?  There looks like a LOT of good articles that might help here.
Also, we need to create a map for the road.  Optimally, this should include:
*The current section highlighted
*The proposed "full build" routing for the future highway
*The proposed alternative routings given in the above references
Any ideas?
--Jayron32 16:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found great reference, expanded the article, still needs map & more references 

message: The building of the bridge between Merrimack and Litchfield has started.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.91.239.99 (talk) 08:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? Where?  Your RSA link doesn't provide new info. And I assume you're not talking about the new airport connector. --Ken Gallager (talk) 12:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridge between Merrimack and Litchfield 

message: The Sagamore Bridge project was completed in stages during the 1990s.  I'm working mostly from memory, and I am sure that old copies of The Telegraph would cover it, but I'm fairly certain that the bridge was doubled by 1992 (when I got my driver's licence) and not much before that.  The original Sagamore bridge terminated at both ends with a simple stoplight at the river side of both roads (DW Highway and Lowell Road), and was a two-lane bridge.  The second span was installed probably around 1991-1992, but the termini didn't change configuration much.  On the Nashua side, at the same time as the second span was added, there was a split installed towards the end of the bridge that divided southbound and northbound DW Highway traffic.  DW highway-bound traffic used the same stoplight as before, (essentially directly under where the overpass is now) but they added an onramp from northbound DW highway to the Sagamore bridge where the current on/off ramps are to the south of the overpass.  The current configuration didn't open until probably 1998 or 1999 (I'm pretty sure I had graduated college by then) if not later, as was part of the massive US 3 rebuild that added the third lane to US3 and built the Exit 2/Exit 1A ramps and rebuilt the approaches to Exit 1 (Spit Brook Road).  The Hudson side configuration was changed at around the same time that Lowell Road was widened in that area, which coincided with the opening of Sam's Club and Walmart, probably around 1993-1994, when they rearranged the road to allow for the Circumferential Highway to continue on straight, which of course, they never have.  --Jayron32 13:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Answering Ken's edit summary question...
Talk:Tirsuli

message: I created an article for Tirsuli West (or "Trishuli West") instead of keeping it here. They are both similarly independent peaks (e.g. they have similar prominences, according to my map) so I don't think it makes sense to imply that one is a subpeak of the other, as I think the previous organization did. If these peaks should be grouped together, then I would say that the whole Hardeol-Tirsuli-Tirsuli West massif should be one article. -- Spireguy 03:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split off Trishuli (Tirsuli) West 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 14:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition
Talk:2-Bromo-1-chloropropane

message: I need to know if "2-Bromo-1-Chloropropane" is the same as "Dibromochloropropane".
Randreed 18:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope.  Dibromochloropropane has two bromine atoms and one chlorine atom.  2-Bromo-1-chloropropane has one of each.  --Ed (Edgar181) 18:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dibromochloropropane?
Talk:Owen Sound Greys

message: Regarding changes to Owen Sound Greys; here is the precedent set forth for season-by-season results.
# All seasons should be in chronological order, regardless or team's nickname.
# Colour-coded backgrounds denote a change in the team name only.
# The league change is denoted in the standing column. For example, 5th League X, 7th League Y. etc.
# When possible, link the season to the article for that season.
# Bold first place finishes.
In summary, the results should be put back into chronological order, the backgrounds colour-coded, and a legend inserted at the top. Flibirigit 23:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jason, I know you've spent a long time working on that system... but I really think we should consider changing the colour coding to league changes, not nickname changes... teams outside of the CHL bounce from league to league like they are in a pinball machine... that's all.  DMighton 04:43, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Season-by-season results

message: Regarding the changes to the franchise history inside Template:Hockey team; the precedent set forth is to keep everything in chronological order, even it means repeating "Owen Sound Greys" three times. Also, the dates are overlapping now. It would appear that more than one franchise existed at the same time. Flibirigit 03:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll see about tweaking that. DMighton 04:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Franchise history
Talk:Bumble Ball

message: Um.  Why would anybody want to link to "Bumble Ball"?  The existence of this thing is basically irrelevant to the universe.  Can we just accept that some articles won't be referenced by other articles, and remove that banner? JDS2005 08:02, 7 January, 2007 (UTC)
:Of course other articles would link to it: things like List of toys, List of Ertl products, Katamari Damacy, etc. --Damian Yerrick (☎) 17:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned?
Talk:Top 14

message: This article can be merged to article Top 14.--Wakowako (talk) 12:30, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Absolutly no. Top 14 is a general article. This page is an article asbout an edition of the french champiosnhip.
Its like to merge this page:
2011 Rugby World Cup
with :
Rugby World Cup
--Carcamagnu (talk) 12:59, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to [[Top 14]]
Talk:Hady Mirza

message: this is obviously not written encyclo style. Chensiyuan 03:05, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tharsis

message: The article dates Olympus Mons in the Noachian - however this paper suggests early amazonian epoch? sbandrews (t) 21:00, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled section

message: I'm in the process of adding a section that covers Borgia and Murray's (2010) notion that the Tharsis bulge is actually a giant volcano. Right now the section is too long, so I'm trying to edit it down. I realize I'm running the risk here of placing undue emphasis on a single controversial theory. However, I think it's worth the space to discuss here because I think the idea reflects a paradigm shift that is happening in volcanology. Feedback is welcome. Schaffman (talk) 18:14, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tharsis as giant volcano?

message: Could someone correct the figs for these at List of tallest mountains in the Solar System? In order to compare peaks on different worlds, we need base-to-peak heights, and those aren't necessarily easy to come by. (At Tharsis Montes, for example, we compare 18.2 km for Ascraeus vs. 9 km for Mauna Loa, but those measurements are not comparable.) Thanks. — kwami (talk) 21:51, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  base-to-peak height
Talk:List of surface features of Mars visited by Spirit and Opportunity

message: List of surface features of Mars imaged by Spirit and List of surface features of Mars imaged by Opportunity → List of surface features of Mars visited by Spirit and Opportunity – it would probably make more sense to have these two otherwise short articles consolidated into one, and renamed "" rather than "", as the purpose of these missions obviously weren't to just take pictures of things. WikiProject Astronomy and WikiProject Spaceflight have been notified of this discussion through their respective talk pages. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 05:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  But they're locations visited by the same Mars Exploration Rovers mission, and both articles are practically stubs that would be better consolidated into a list-icle about all locations visited by the Mars Exploration Rovers. Not sure why we'd need two stub lists for something that absolutely can be a single list. – PhilipTerryGraham (talk · articles · reviews) 10:24, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:North Polar Basin (Mars)

message: : The North Polar Basin, or Borealis basin, is a large basin in the northern hemisphere of Mars that covers 40% of the planet.
Martian dichotomy says the lowlands cover one-third of Mars.  Does the polar basin include all of the lowlands (and then some)?  Other theories see two or three basins in the north.
: Chryse Planitia, the landing site of the Viking 1 lander, is a bay which empties into this basin.
There must be way to put this that does not imply flowing water.  I'll change empties to opens. —Tamfang (talk) 16:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  contradiction; implication 

message: Hello everyone!
Apologies, but I meant to post this a few days ago to give the community a chance to respond. As part of a writing class, I am contributing to this page, and will start making modifications tonight. All my drafted changes can be found in my  sandbox.
Happy editing! Maa0519 (talk) 02:23, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New changes
Talk:Syrtis Major Planum

message: : Syrtis Major Planum is ... was then known as Syrtis Major Planitia.
Wait, it's called Syrtis Major Planum but was formerly known as Syrtis Major Planum?—RJH (talk) 15:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planum 

message: Wasn't the Syrtis Major originally given this name "The Great Bog" because it was originally thought to be either marshland or some sort of wetland?AT Kunene (talk) 09:32, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syrtis Major
Talk:Utopia Planitia

message: The Wikipedia icon for this article is showing up on Google Earth at these coordinates - on earth (in this case, in southeast Russia). Is there anyway to keep this from coming up, or to make clear these are non-earth coordinates? Otebig (talk) 10:15, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The coordinates are already set to go to Mars. I don't know when that happened over the past 4 years, but it's currently correct. Modest Genius talk 13:48, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Google Earth
Talk:Endurance (crater)

message: Opportunity may have discovered liquid, possibly water, in the crater.    Also, what is the latitude of Endurance crater?  --zandperl 02:04, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's complete bollocks. Here's the processed version of the image and here's some context. Looks like sand to me. Also, the rover was on a π/9 slope when the picture was taken. MER-C 04:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water discovery?
Talk:Tycho Brahe (Martian crater)

message: Perhaps it should be worth noting that Arthur C. Clarke used Tycho Brahe as a moonbase in Earthlight. KickTheDonkey 02:18, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional Note 

message: The article says "Tycho Brahe is a crater on Mars named after its discoverer, the Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe." I have heard that Tycho was an exceptional observer, but to have managed to observe a crater on Mars without a telescope, which was not invented until after Tycho's death, is beyond extraordinary. 24.36.74.15 (talk) 04:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are You Sure? 

message: Why is this article marked as top importance? What makes it so special? --Oefe (talk) 15:41, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this was rated top-importance for WikiProject Mars, not for the solar system project.  This is a major feature of the martian surface, so this may qualify.  However, I think "high" importance may be more realistic. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 18:28, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't think that being a "major feature of the martian surface" qualifies it as top importance. (BTW, does a crater which is only slightly above 100 km diameter already count as "major feature"?). Many craters on mars are larger than Tycho Brahe, but most of them are marked as low importance, or don't even have an article at all. Those craters that are marked mid or high importance have outstanding features (e.g traces of water) or are research targets (e.g. landing sites).  There are only two other mars craters marked top importance, namely Victoria (crater) and Erebus (crater), both of which have been visited and extensively researched by the Opportunity rover. As far as I know, there is nothing which makes Tycho Brahe special, so I think "low importance" would be more appropriate. --Oefe (talk) 14:30, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good points.  be bold and feel free to change it. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 17:52, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top-Importance?
Talk:McCool Hill

message: : The hill was to be Spirit rover's next target. She was expect significant north-facing slopes on the hill in mid-April 2006, and spend her second winter on Mars there.
(This was written almost four years ago!)  I assume she was expected to «verb» the slopes; reach them? climb them? fall off them? see them? —Tamfang (talk) 02:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  old gibberish
Talk:Tirsuli West

message: See the Trishuli talk page for why I split this off. -- Spireguy 03:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split from [[Trishuli]] 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 14:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Columbia Hills (Mars)

message: Why no Challenger Hills?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.67.35.112 (talk) 19:34, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenger Hills? 

message: Which one is it and what is it's approx elev, anyone? Pomona17 (talk) 13:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tallest hill 

message: The correct name is anhydrIte.Eudialytos (talk) 17:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  No such mineral as "anhydrate"
Talk:Lowell High School (Lowell, Indiana)

message: would like to see a list of all titles lowell has won in all sports. maybe a picture of LMS when it was the high school. a picture of the old school design & the new upgrades. picture of new logo. M8gen
* I took a picture of LHS, and added it to the article. I also completed the wikification, by adding some categories, and cleaning up the article. Please note that the sports list on the page is not complete. Thanks! :) Tvaughn05e (Talk)(Contribs) 14:46, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 
Talk:Alba Mons

message: I have some references that might be helpful. I'll add them. Schaffman (talk) 10:02, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: I'm uncertain whether it's a shield volcano in the sense that Olympus Mons is. It's more like a pancake in profile--a kind of volcano unique to Mars. Schaffman (talk) 10:30, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Shield Volcano

message: I'd like to begin expanding this into short article. Any comments are welcome. Schaffman (talk) 10:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding stub 

message: I'm about to write the geology section. Before that though, I'm going through the Ivanov and Head (2006) paper to update the figures on the volcano's dimensions and elevations from those previously published (pre-MOLA). These changes will be entered as minor edits, but numbers will be changed. Schaffman (talk) 12:54, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up sections before Geology section. 

message: I've largely finished the article except for general editing. Any comments are welcome. Schaffman (talk) 15:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finished Article
Talk:Charles II: The Power and the Passion

message: Given the big differences between the versions shown in the UK and the US, I felt the more important of differences should be noted.
I also decided to lay out some of the differences between the reality and the mini-series.
PainMan 03:38, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for expansion 

message: Overall this is a fantastic film on Charles, but it sort of portrays James negatively as the few times he is on screen he is throwing a hissy fit. Is there any way we can mention in the article that is might be an unfair view of James? - Yorkshirian (talk) 19:39, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unfair portrail of James
Talk:Ascraeus Mons

message: This article contradicts the article on Olympus Mons.  This article says "This arrangement suggests that [the Tharsis Montes volcanoes] were formed by a crustal plate moving over a hot spot" but the Olympus Mons explains that volcano's enormous height by saying that "Mars does not have tectonic plates". Dricherby (talk) 20:10, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with Olympus Mons article 

message: The photo in the descrition box is a nice oblique view of the volcano's caldera wall, but it really doesn't show the whole structure. I think we need a better picture. Schaffman (talk) 14:33, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo in Box 

message: The geologic evidence is that the whole edifice formed over a very long period of Mars history, even though some relatively recent flows may be present. The wording implies that the volcano itself is young, which is probably not true. Schaffman (talk) 15:50, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   [Volcano] was formed from relatively recent liquid lava flows.
Talk:John Player & Sons

message: JPS (John Player Specials) are still available in Canada and at a Duty Free shop I was at in at the Oregon Airport.  Could someone please write about them and post photos.  JPS's are not my forte sorry!
--Mrtobacco 14:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Player Specials 

message: This page lists the price in Ireland as €7.45, John Player Blue are €7.40 not .45 just wanted to clear that up86.42.72.239 (talk) 15:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish Price 

message: Why can't we buy JPS in stores in SA, We being told it's not made anymore, I smoke JPS for almost a lifetime and don't find a other cigarette close to it, I sort of have a big problem here in South Africa. Please let me know what I can do to get JPS again.
Thanks
Lindie Greyling (lindiel@xnets.co.za)
41.0.30.162 (talk) 09:23, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  JPS king size 

message: The list of available Player's brands here is a bit of a mess. Some are available in some countries only, others have different names in different countries and some I cannot find record of. I will tidy this when I get time, but it cannot be fully comprehensive and it might have to go. Scotchegg (talk) 10:55, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brands 
Talk:List of extraterrestrial volcanoes

message: I am suggesting that Volcanically active worlds should be merged into this article. The other article has serious deficiencies as a stand-alone. However, if properly sourced and edited a bit, its contents could serve as the basis for a useful introduction to this article. --Orlady (talk) 00:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That article has been deleted. I'll remove the tag here. -- Avenue (talk) 11:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Volcanically active worlds

message: It would be better to develop the article not as a list, but as an overview of volcanism in Solar system, including Earth, and to rename it accordingly to such content. Making the "list of extraterrestrial volcanoes" is evidently impossible: they are countless, often indistinct, and majority of them - nameless. Stas (talk) 16:18, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name and content 

message: The article currently describes the plumes on Triton as "noncryovolcanic geysers". I'm not sure what that means or what the source for that statement is. In the scientific literature, I'm used to those plumes being described as evidence of cryovolcanism. (And, by the way, they and the plumes on Enceladus are not geysers. That term refers to a specific, subsurface process and implies occasional, eruptive events rather than more continuous venting. There's no evidence to support calling these plumes "geysers.") Fcrary (talk) 03:30, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "noncryovolcanic geysers" on Triton? 

message: Doesn't the sun have eruptions, too? Isn't the sun more active than Io in terms of eruptions per surface area, given that the former is the only solar system object with a substantially hot interior. It has gysers of superhot plasma. 74.135.194.87 (talk) 16:30, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sun
Talk:Arcadia Planitia

message: The shallow and fairly abundant supplies of water ice for making methalox rocket propellants, and lower latitudes for more acceptabloe thermal environment for initial Mars flights, seem to be attracting a lot of SpaceX interest for their Starship / Super Heavy interplanetary flights pursuing their Mars expedition architecture.  Most (or all?) of their current potential landing sites are in/on Arcadia Planitia.  Looking for better and secondary sources. N2e (talk) 04:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  SpaceX is apparently researching several Arcadia Planitia landing sites
Talk:Vastitas Borealis

message: The recent news reports about the presumed meteor that reshaped Mars  - isn't this about the origins of Vastitas Borealis? Although I didn't see an explicit mention of "Vastitas Borealis" ... if my presumption is correct, doesn't this merit mention in this entry in Wikipedia? TomS TDotO (talk) 12:41, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Meteoric cause?
Talk:Terra Sirenum

message: What are the origins of the name, and what does it mean? Who named the region? Ry (talk) 02:44, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of the name Sirenum? 

message: Isn't this the site where Mars 2 landed back in the 70's?  No word on whether they found debris of any kind? Jalanp2 (talk) 18:19, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviet Mars 2 landing site
Talk:Margaritifer Terra

message: Shouldn't it be Margaritifera Terra?
Does deriving the name of a terra (Mars) from a sinus (Mars) not change the gender?
--Error (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Margaritifera 

message: has ""Using orbital images, we identified clay-bearing sediments within northern Ladon Valles, southern Ladon basin, and the southwestern highlands around Ladon basin," - Rod57 (talk) 17:07, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clays found in Ladon valles/basin
Talk:Congressional Page sex scandal

message: This article WAS the article on the 1983 Congressional page sex scandal until it was moved a few days ago.  It stands to reason that people visiting this would be looking for that page.  In fact, a number of links for the 1983 scandal still point to this namespace.  It also stands to reason that people would not be looking for the Mark Foley scandal, which can not fairly be characterized as a sex scandal.  I think there is no reason to make this a disambugation page and it should remain a redirect to its original article.--Bibliophylax 15:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Making this a disambig page