lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Last Waltz (soundtrack)

message: This is a fairly iconic album that appears on several "Best of" lists, especially for live recordings. NME listed it at #33 of their "50 Greatest Live Albums of All Time" in 2003(http://www.nme.com/photos/the-50-greatest-live-albums-of-all-time/207806/1/1#18), and Paul Gambaccini listed it at #96 in his 1987 book "100 Greatest Albums" (http://www.timepieces.nl/Top100%27s/1987PaulGambaccini.html). I think Q listed it at #2 in their 2006 list of "20 Greatest Live Albums" but I haven't found the cite yet. The movie usually gets into one of the top spots of the best concert films of all time (http://www.rollingstone.com/music/photos/readers-poll-the-best-concert-movies-of-all-time-20120314/1-the-last-waltz-0367401), but that's probably better left to the concert article. 
I'm gonna try to shore up the references and ratings and add a section for it. Comments/suggestions welcome. Jrdeardorff (talk) 18:49, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accolades 

message: The Last Waltz (2002 album) should be merged into this. That article is largely a track listing and personnel, which overlaps here, and many sources treat these as different releases of the same album (e.g. Discogs and Musicbrainz). There isn't enough material in terms of the albums themselves nor from reliable sources to consider these separate releases, just different versions of the same album.
] ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:02, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: there are multiple paragraphs in the lead but not so much to take up too much space in the other article, and that's even assuming all of that's keepable since none of it appears to be sourced aside from one fansite at the end of the third paragraph. QuietHere (talk) 05:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Stage Fright (album)

message: I think the line about The Band being a "Canadian" group needs rewording. Levon Helm is from the USA. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 22:10, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian group?
Talk:Arbogast (magister militum)

message: It's perhaps just me but this section seems like a cut and paste from something else. The style is all wrong. There isn't the right sort of neutrality. Take this sentence, " With defeat getting near, Theodosius and his armies retreated towards the protection of the Justinian Alps where Theodosius prayed to God asking him for help against his enemies.", as an example. It strikes me that there is too much speculative assertion and not enough distance. 
Panama1958 (talk) 09:00, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: To me the whole article seems suitable for a first-year student essay but not really for an encyclopedia. Plenty of good sources are quoted, and the facts are given with due attention to NPOV. It's just the florid style, and that seems to go back to one user who did a lot of good work, greatly expanded the article and added the references. It needs serious abbreviation. Thanks to the editor who did so much work on it. Richard Keatinge (talk) 09:23, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle Of Frigidus 

message: How he got that germanic name?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.113.181.175 (talk) 18:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why he has germanic name?
Talk:Lightface analytic game

message: Certainly somewhere there need to be pages explaining what lightface means, and the lightface equivalent of analytic set, and what a game is, but I have some doubts whether they need to be unified in one page.  On the other hand it is a convenient link from 0#.  Anyway it was hanging around as requested for more than two years, and wasn't hard to define, so I went ahead and drew up the page. --Trovatore 02:04, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this page exist?
Talk:Shugakuin Imperial Villa

message: I don't quite follow why this is not capitalised. Buckingham Palace is also not written with a small "p". Gryffindor 23:02, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. From Shugaku-in imperial villa to Shugaku-in Imperial Villa. No objections in three weeks.  –Hajor 02:21, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move request

message: I have serious thought to putting this at "Shūgaku-in", not "Shugaku-in", but I decided not to because the vast majority of English-language books which talk about it do not use the macron. As to why I went with "imperial villa", see Talk:Katsura imperial villa. Noel (talk) 02:20, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Bible (disambiguation)

message: I'm going to remove the Bible translations here. These are different versions of the same Bible spoken of in the main article; they aren't different meanings or uses of the word "bible". -Branddobbe 19:53, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Translations) 

message: Islam needs to be added to the Religions that consider it sacred texts
74.221.10.203 (talk) 01:16, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: -- Diannaa (talk) 01:23, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islam needs to be added
Talk:Fear and Desire

message: changed "rise of DVD-Rs" to just "rise of DVDs" since the PHYSICAL file-sharing medium is privy to more than just one format of DVDs (DVD+R, DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD+RW, etc).
-grey  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.54.167.102 (talk) 18:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I have rewritten the article, adding references and detailed production history. I believe this provides a greater depth to the article and to the appreciation of the subject. Ecoleetage (talk) 23:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite of article 

message: @User:Youcandobetter Please can we discuss our dispute here? I don't understand your reasoning, and what sources u were referring to? The BBFC for example says it came out in 1953: https://www.bbfc.co.uk/release/fear-and-desire-q29sbgvjdglvbjpwwc0ynjy1mdc (this should be added as a source for the runtime in the infobox), the only bit of the article which says it's a 1952 film is the lead sentence whilst the search description and external links all say '53, and generally that sentence is the only place I have ever seen saying this is not a '52 film - on or off Wikipedia Stephanie921 (talk) 17:58, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: https://www.labiennale.org/en/news/stanley-kubrick%E2%80%99s-first-film-fear-and-desire-1952-venice-film-festival YouCanDoBetter (talk) 19:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I still don't get ur point. This is just when it was at the festival, which usually never counts as the release date. Usually the premiere before the release date counts, which was in 53. Festivals are just unreleased special screenings @User:Youcandobetter Stephanie921 (talk) 19:13, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not the case. Festival dates count all throughout Wikipedia, they just aren't always in the infobox because a lot of films don't get festival screenings. The cases when festival appearances don't count are at private screenings for investors, or invite-only private festivals. This appears to be a public screening. YouCanDoBetter (talk) 19:20, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Year
Talk:Killer's Kiss

message: I re-built the article today.  As such, I deleted the following which had no sources:
* Kubrick began to shoot the film with sound recorded on location, as was common practice in Hollywood. However, frustrated by the intrusion of the microphone into his lighting scheme, Kubrick fired his soundman and decided to post-dub the entire film as he had with his first film.
* It was Kubrick's second feature, and the earliest still available (he removed his first film Fear and Desire from circulation over his displeasure for it). Kubrick was 26 years old when he directed this movie, and had to borrow $40,000 from his uncle, who owned a drug store in New York. (found source)
* Silvera had worked with Kubrick on his previous feature, Fear and Desire. Most of the film's locations were minutes away from Kubrick's apartment, a trend which would continue even after moving to England, preferring to work as close to home as possible.
All good stuff but, if not incorporated into a well written introduction, they all belong in BACKGROUND section.  So, please let's find some good sources so we can add them back in!  Thanks -- Luigibob (talk) 23:00, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted EDITS, that need sources
Talk:The Killing (film)

message: This article doesn't seem a very good target for redirecting "Killing". The article on the mathematician Wilhelm Killing would seem a more appropriate target, but a disambiguation page between him, things named for him, this film and other works of the same title would seem in order.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.247.2 (talk) 20:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate redirect/disambiguation 

message: The film performed poorly at the box office and was in general not critically acclaimed.The reference given doesn't confirm nor undermine that assumption. totoeoe (talk) 18:39, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  reception 

message: In the 'production' section there lives the line...
 At Kubrick's suggestion they hired film noir novelist Jim Thompson to write the script.
I would like to change this to 'hardboiled fiction novelist', as there can't really be any such thing as a 'film noir novel', as 'film noir' applies to, well, film. Any objections to my changing this?203.220.186.11 (talk) 22:43, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  slight contradiction in terms... 

message: Aside from Hayden, with whom he had been impressed while shooting The Asphalt Jungle, Kubrick cast actors from film noirs he had liked
This line makes little sense, as Kubrick had nothing to do with the 'shooting' of The Asphalt Jungle.203.220.186.11 (talk) 22:48, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  strange line 

message: Criterion put up an interview with the producer: youtu.be/jQwRW7E2-Mk --91.5.109.82 (talk) 07:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interview with the Producer
Talk:Robert Kanigher

message: The Comics Index at the end of Lepore (revised, 2015) may be better than GCD as it relies on a variety of sources to attempt to compile a more accurate list of her appearances with authors up to 1948. Kanigher first appears with the comic book Wonder Woman with some of the stories in issue 30 (July-August 1948), though his work is found in some WW stories in the occasional issue of Sensation Comics and Comics Cavalcade as early as 1945 (and 1948 again respectively). ELSchissel (talk) 00:08, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kanigher on Wonder Woman 

message: I have heard a number of people pronounce the middle part of his name like "nigh," which is not the pronunciation shown here, which is unsourced.  It could be that they're simply worried that it might sound like they're using an offensive word, but I don't know. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 06:13, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Category talk:Formula One circuits

message: Would it  be worth splitting this into to sub-categories for current circuits and former circuits? Dunarc (talk) 22:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have advertised this discussion at the Formula One WikiProject, as I suspect not too many editors are watching this category. DH85868993 (talk) 07:44, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub category
Category talk:Formula One constructors

message: Hi. I am wondering wether the name of this category is entirely applicable to many of the teams represented within it. While there are some undoubted "constructors" listed, there are also quite a few teams who ran customer cars built by other manufacturers. These teams (e.g. Ecurie Francorchamps) would be better described as "F1 Teams", "F1 Customer teams" or similar. This would also allow the inclusion of teams currently simply listed as "Auto Racing Teams" (e.g. Ecurie Ecosse) thouh they did run in F1. Any opinions on this please? Pyrope 08:24, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change/Subpage?

message: I question the inclusion of the "Indy 500 only" constructors (Kurtis-Kraft, Kuzma, etc) in this category. Because they didn't construct Formula One cars. "World (Drivers) Championship" constructors? Sure. "Indycar" (in its broadest sense) constructors? Absolutely. But "Formula One" constructors? No. DH85868993 12:35, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, this is just another symptom of the fact that every Wikipedia article related to the World Drivers and Constructors Championships has the words "Formula One" in the title, even when it's not strictly accurate - consider that the article describing the 1952 WDC is entitled 1952 Formula One season even though none of the races in the Championship was run to Formula 1 rules.... DH85868993 16:55, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Following discussion on the WP:F1 discussion page, concensus is that we will retain the existing name for categories such as this one (even if they're not stricly 100% accurate) and add explanatory notes. DH85868993 11:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of "Indy 500 only" constructors
Talk:Kevin Nash

message: An ip user removed an unnecessary edit here:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kevin_Nash&diff=924089612&oldid=922972138, he did have a career with the basketball team in his early days. If someone can restore this back that would be good. As shown here: "American professional wrestler, actor and former basketball player". 2600:1000:B00F:9AAD:CD9E:2079:FD4D:C7DF (talk) 04:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done —KuyaBriBriTalk 14:59, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2019
Talk:Women in heraldry

message: "She refers to abstractions personified as feminine, and also for the soul, a city, a country, an army, the Church, and others" (Emphasis added). So the answer to your question is yes.
:Um, no. That is a linguistic convention, and has no bearing on heraldic reality. → ROUX ₪ 10:39, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  To be fair, language and heraldry are both conventional symbolic systems, equally connected to and equally detached from 'reality'.  But they are distinct symbolic systems, so the conventions of one need not tell us anything about the other. —Tamfang (talk) 16:12, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Borredà a woman?

message: So far the article has been about woman armigers, but I think it would be useful to also discuss woman heralds such as Claire Boudreau. Arlo James Barnes 23:37, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  scope
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Benjamin Cory Elementary School

message: #Articles would be too big.
#*Rather than more hot air all around, how about we try ang get short and sweet answeres to these questions:
#**How big is the average school article right now?
#**How many schools per town/county/district/state do we have now?
#**What's the "growth rate" for school articles?
#**How big can they actually get while remaining encyclopedic?
#*With this information we can easily determine if there is anything inherently wrong with the idea of merging school articles based upon article size.
#*Please provide links/diffs to support any claim that is made.
#* For actual arguments against merging, see other sections above this one.  To my knowledge, nobody else has argued against merging on the grounds that it would make articles too big.  A wildly inaccurate attempt to summarise arguments is worse than useless. --Tony SidawayTalk 23:41, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Current arguments against merging

message: *I've taken my sigs off the above.  It's meant to be an NPOV summary. brenneman(t)(c) 00:24, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Grandfather's House

message: There seems to be some versions of the song refering to the house as Grandmother's and some as Grandfather's. I'll try to track down some book versions of this song; hopefully I can find a more authoritative source. It's very possible that Grandmother is the correct word since the author was an abolitionist, though little known in her time. In the interim, I'll write a quick note on the article. Janet13 03:28, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry... I found some reference to that online, didn't really think it through. I removed it. Added net and book sources on each version (used Amazon's "search inside the book" function, since I can't get to a library right now). Janet13 03:55, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

text: If the poem was published in 1844 surely it shouldn't be that hard to track down the version that was first published, should it? Either way, the first reference should be the same as the article title and the second should be the other one. --Angr/ 05:53, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's from the 1844 Flowers for Children, volume 2. Which does not seem to be exceedingly rare but not easy to get an original copy of. I've had my library take the 1854 reprint edition out of the depository for me and I'll probably look into it by tomorrow. --Fastfission 12:33, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

text: And for the record, the "Grandfather's house" poem in the external link section looks a lot more reputable (even has a citation) than the other one, which looks like the later "song" version. But I haven't double-checked all of this yet. --Fastfission 15:51, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grandmother versus Grandfather
Talk:Ottoman (furniture)

message: There is only one hit for C. Frederick Ottoman, 1st Viscount of Ottoman, in a google search -- the text of which appears to be cut-and-pasted here. It is doubted that the ottoman was in invented in this manner.
I love that the picture caption states that the ottoman is "In its natural habitat."141.152.11.118 01:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I made a blog post recently about the term humpty which is what we call an Ottoman in New Zealand, and whilst writing it discovered that the term is also used in Newfoundland. I tried to edit this page to add links to those, but the system warned that blog posts aren't usually accepted as references, so I didn't post it. I can't find any other references explaining it though, so just including them here for anyone who may find them useful or wants to include them in the article anyway.
https://missingtherock.blogspot.com/2007/11/newfoundland-word-of-day.html
https://random.hellyer.kiwi/humpties/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryanhellyer27 (talk • contribs) 09:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humpty 

message: It seems that the term ottoman as applied to furniture is offensive to some.  See  and .  Seems it might be worth a mention.  --24.39.216.237 06:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why Ottoman should be offensive to anyone, except possibly Armenians. It's not a racial epithet.Gymnophoria (talk) 11:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offensive? 

message: In the UK we'd call this a pouffe - an Ottoman is a kind of backless sofa with either one or two ends for leaning on. They derive from the Roman dining couch and this is the authentic meaning. Not sure how silly Americans turned this into a footstool.Gymnophoria (talk) 11:49, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an Ottoman in the UK 

message: Please could explicit mention be made of whether it is an “Ottoman” or an “ottoman”? JDAWiseman (talk) 13:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation
Talk:Lawn Dogs

message: This article needs extensive cleanup. It reads like a high school essay and is badly organized and relatively uninformative as to the contents of the film itself, its box office performance, etc. Vintagejonny 04:28, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: BBQ		the market
beer		art
board		power
burp		love
childhood	the primal
child play	actions driven by primal urges
conception	integration of ideologies to form something new
dad's gun	anger / aggression
dog		peace / stability / social order
driving		progress through time
flag		patriotism
glasses		charity / welfare programs / social assistance
heart		way of thinking
heart defect	emotional/intuitive thought over logic/reason
high diving	striking
light posts	resources (environmental and/or economic)
money		respect / prestige 
river		the land
sex		political alliance
suburbia	capitalist society
turtle		solidarity display
woods		community  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.105.222.166 (talk) 01:39, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete List of Symbols
Talk:Lisa McCune

message: Can any readers of New Idea or Women's Weekly fill in how many children Ms. MsCune has? --Robert Merkel 03:39, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That was a bit facetious, but the point remains that given the number of times she features on the covers of those magazines they might actually know. --Robert Merkel 10:30, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Yes, way back in July 2009 McCunes entire marriage related text was deleted! diff.
;Deleted text
== Personal Life ==
McCune is married to Tim Disney, a film technician who was once part of the Blue Heelers crew. They began dating in 1996, and married on 18 February 2000. They have three children: sons Archer James (born 31 May 2001) and Oliver Timothy (born early October 2003), and daughter Remy Elise (born 15 June 2005).
 ''
Which is unsourced, but appears accurate. Here current married life seem a bit 'turbulent' though:
;Potential sources
* https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/entertainment/a/24740343/lisa-mccunes-colourful-past/
* http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2773183/Are-Lisa-McCune-Teddy-Tahu-Rhodes-guessing-share-stroll-sunshine-reported-public-lover-s-tiff.html (Daily Mail? a bit 'tabloidy'!)
* http://www.ninemsn.com.au/article/8517540?site=womansday
* http://www.nzwomansweekly.co.nz/front-page-top-stories/kiwi-opera-singer-steals-actress-lisa-mccunes-heart/
--220 of Borg 05:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Personal life' deleted