Talk:Section 31 (Star Trek)

message: The information regarding Section 31's inclusion in ENT, specifically:
"Reportedly Section 31 will be involved in an upcoming two-part story involving the Klingons and detailing why their visual appearance changes. The NX-01's security officer, Malcolm Reed, is also somehow involved (though the details have not yet been revealed)."
What is the source of this information, and how has it been affected by the cancellation? THOR 19:45, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enterprise? 

message: I personally would find it very handy if there was a list of episodes dealing with Section 31, similar to how many frequent recurring characters (such as Dukat, Nog, and Liquidator Brunt) have lists of episodes in which they appeared. Althai 10:53, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Althai 18:37, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episodes dealing with Section 31 

message: : From the template: "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to its deletion for any reason." As I indicated in the revert, this particular aspect of Trek encompasses multiple episodes, all of which have individual articles on Wikipedia, but do not completely document this organization of the Trek world. This article is the central repository and center of information regarding this part of Trek and is necessary (and notable) for the impact it has had on the Trek universe in general, in addition to having spawned many books. VigilancePrime 01:54, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD/deletion thought 

message: Who are Barrett and Barrett and why is it so important that we care wat they think about Star Trek. I'm sorry, I don't mean to sound aggressive, but who are they and why should their opinions matter more than others? I'm just curious. (Bobbo9000 (talk) 05:57, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears to reference this book: "Barrett, Michèle, and Duncan Barrett. (2001) Star Trek The Human Frontier. Cambridge: Polity Press."  I'm going through and properly footnoting it.--Aervanath (talk) 21:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barrett and Barrett  

message: In Star Trek Into Darkness they treat Section 31 as an open secret.  This is also how they're treating it in Discovery.  Isn't this a distinctive break from Deep Space 9 and Enterprise?  It's as if Abrams and Kurtzman are basically just referring back at their own prior work and not the rest of the series. -Reticuli 2605:A000:1301:A37F:353F:BEAF:FDF:E00C (talk) 21:13, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have JJ Abrams and Alex Kurtzman ever claimed they're familiar with the prior series canon? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Section 2 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 11:16, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: Is there an out-of-universe reason for why "31" was chosen? Jimw338 (talk) 17:49, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I skimmed Memory Alpha but didn't see anything regarding that. It could be random. DonIago (talk) 04:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out-of-universe reason for "31"?