Talk:Eye tracking

message: saccade? --Abdull 14:42, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Why not? Tony 14:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So is a merger possible? It would be relatively simple, but I don't know how to do it technically. Does anyone object? Tony 23:46, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Use the  and  templates. (documentation at Template:Mergeto and Template:Mergefrom.) Post them for a while (a couple of weeks, maybe) & see what people think. If nobody objects or has other better ideas, then go for it. (I'd do it but not quite sure what you have in mind, in terms of from/to, and inclusion of content.) --lquilter 00:30, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with "[[Eye tracker]]"? 

message: Eye Tracking Technology Breakthroughs 11-05-2015
Zoopid Ideas  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biomedicus (talk • contribs) 18:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline text 

message: Could this section be updated? At the moment it feels like a commercial for a certain product, surely the liberal use of trademarks is not necessary?Protiek 00:55, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * I've now taken out the unnecessary ™ symbols. See Wikipedia_talk:Trademark_notices for some earlier discussion of this topic and why these notices are not necessary; see also Fair use (US trademark law). I didn't remove the images themselves at this point. I still think there are issues in terms of appearing to promote particular companies but until there are substitutes available I thought they were better than nothing. --lquilter 00:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial technology

message: In a few days' time, unless someone thinks of a good reason not to. Tony 08:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intention to merge the article "Eye tracker" into this one 

message: "Huey built what might be the first eye tracker," ???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.69.112 (talk) 04:45, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is "Huey" introduced in second section? 

message: I am wondering if mention of "poor man's eye tracking" would be appropriate in this article http://www.stcsig.org/sn/PDF/Cooke_mouse_eye_tracker.pdf --Bcjordan (talk) 07:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor man's eye tracking 

message: Please write something about diagnosing ASD with eye-tracking equipment. It is a widely known fact that people who have this disorders do not concentrate their sight on eyes but rather on mouth, or not on faces altogether. This is not always readily visible by simply looking at eyeball of that person because he may learn that it is rude to avoid eye contact so is looking very close to interlocutor's eyes but his eye movement doesn't follow the patter exhibited by normal people. pwjbbb (talk) 21:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  eye tracking and diagnosis of autism/asperger? 

message: Dr. Innocenti has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Innocenti has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Alessandro Innocenti & Alessandra Rufa & Jacopo Semmoloni, 2009. "Overconfident Behavior In Informational Cascades: An Eye-Tracking Study," Department of Economic Policy, Finance and Development (DEPFID) University of Siena 1109, Department of Economic Policy, Finance and Development (DEPFID), University of Siena.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 18:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Innocenti's comment on this article 

message: This article is rather heterogeneous. Eye tracking research and technology advanced a lot in recent years. I'll add information our current knowledge in little packages over the next weeks.  peterkonig 3 June 2017  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterKonig (talk • contribs) 13:23, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Eye tracking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927004541/http://www.newcarnet.co.uk/Lexus_news.html?id=5787 to http://www.newcarnet.co.uk/Lexus_news.html?id=5787
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907093047/http://ged.insead.edu/fichiersti/inseadwp2001/2001-19.pdf to http://ged.insead.edu/fichiersti/inseadwp2001/2001-19.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061011024317/http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/newDriverDistraction.html to http://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/departments/nrd-13/newDriverDistraction.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717051418/http://www.thomasrecording.com/en/cms/front_content.php?idcatart=63&lang=1&client=1 to http://www.thomasrecording.com/en/cms/front_content.php?idcatart=63&lang=1&client=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It occurred to me that the image used to describe the convolutional neural network is wrong: the dimensions of the net cannot change when passing from a convolutional layer to a maxpooling or an activation layer Maccarismos (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the convolutional neural network image