Talk:Shared lane marking

message: A page is now created for shared lane markings (so Sharrow would be spared any more extraneous content). As initially created it's very "bare-bones", so feel free to add and embellish, but please ensure that any added content is consistent with good technical guidance and accepted practice for this marking and bicycle transportation engineering in general. RCMoeur 13:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If "bare-bones" means stub, we could mark the page with . I marked this talk page with , which might slightly increase the odds of attracting quality edits to . The ultimate goal of WikiProject Cycling is to get all cycling-related articles up to at least a good article rating. Most likely that will take a long time. --Teratornis 01:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial page status 

message: Is sharrow at portmanteau of share and arrow? or shared lane and arrow? or something else completely? 74.61.6.82 (talk) 23:41, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of Sharrow 

message: Over 50 locations are listed in the US, with citations for almost 20. When will we have enough places using shared use arrows that we can delete the list and just say "used in many cities across the country?" --Triskele Jim 19:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. The list, as it stands, is incomplete, and trying to update it would be an endless task. Besides, there's the problem of citations. I know for a fact, from personal observation, my own city (Columbia, MO), has them and if I really dug, I possibly could find a cite somewhere, but why bother?  I would question the use of the word "many" in your proposed wording. A more neutral phrase, such as "a number" may be more suitable. 173.202.242.209 (talk) 19:44, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of cities 

message: The study "Comparing the effects of infrastructure on bicycling injury at intersections and non-intersections using a case–crossover design",  reached conclusions wildly contradicting other studies and is inconsistent with itself. Example: while more than half of injury-causing crashes it reported did not involve a motor vehicle, this study reported a 2000% reduction in risk where motor vehicles were excluded. See responses to the report on the study in the journal which published it. Jsallen1 (talk) 18:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviewing cited research 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Shared lane marking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070225035026/http://www.dot.ca.gov:80/hq/traffops/signtech/newtech/minutes/textMin081204.txt to http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/traffops/signtech/newtech/minutes/textMin081204.txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Bicycles May Use Full Lane and Shared lane marking seem to be overlapping subjects, and could be incorporated into one article. Sauer202 (talk) 17:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge [[Bicycles May Use Full Lane]] into [[Shared lane marking]]