lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Radiation

message: In the article Radiation, § X-ray, first line "(greater than 3x10^17 Hz and 1,240 eV)" should be 124 eV Afnylund (talk) 13:39, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: Please provide a reliable source that supports changing this definition.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 16:28, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 September 2017 

message: Possible damage to Health and Environment from certain tipes of radiation
See also: :Electromagnetic radiation and health
Ionizing radiation in certain conditions can cause damage to living organizms, can cause cancer, genetic damage[4].
Non-ionizing radiation in certain conditions also can cause damage to living organizms, such as burns. In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) from the World Health Organization (WHO) released a statement adding radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (including microwave and millimeter waves) to their list of things which are possibly carcinogenic to humans.[10]
The site: "EMF-Portal" of the RWTH Aachen University, present one of the bigests database about the effects of Electromagnetic radiation. As of 12 July 2019 it have "28,547 publications and 6,369 summaries of individual scientific studies on the effects of electromagnetic fields"[11].
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.170.196.53 (talk) 12:26, July 30, 2019 (UTC)
:I fixed the typos and did a bit of copy editing.  I'm not sure the material is totally appropriate or appropriately presented, but that's a harder question. Jordan Brown (talk) 17:22, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many typos in last section "Possible damage to Health and Environment from certain tipes [sic] of radiation" 

message: Numerous research sources show alpha particles to be entirely unable to penetrate paper but there are also sources showing some can and will penetrate a sheet of paper. For this, check out the "The Thought Emporium" Video with the title "Negative Ion/Anti-5g Products are actually radioactive" (video section "Alpha Particles")
This should be noted under the graph until clear research is found and confirmed. Chaos.mindsp4ce (talk) 14:50, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alpha Radiation penetration
Talk:43rd Annual Grammy Awards

message: I would like the page to present the Awards Show (itself) Live Performances. This particular show was a keeper. My memory at this moment brings to mind Paul Simon (maybe thats a waste of angles I dont know) Dolly Parton and Brad Paisley (make it home safe) Elton John and Eminem (oh no / crash) Shelby Lynn ( ). The above I transported to a personal CD. Anyway I'll have to check around for the vhs tape and see if I can pull all the correct info together. Douglas Spotted Eagle, I remember, but not sure if that was tape or live.Greg0658 (talk) 21:53, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Awards Telecast - Live Performances 
Talk:Francesco Algarotti

message: Taksen (talk) 19:35, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If I wait for you, I'll sleep. Krenakarore TK 19:51, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

text: Hi Taksen ( this name sounds great ), it would've been good to work together, but I see that you have other ideas !! You have a careless way of editing Tasken. Learning from others is sth good ! Things like  are highly discouraging you know. Besides, How to become a renowned writer: Francesco Algarotti (1712--1764) and the uses of networking in eighteenth-century is the title of a book and so should be italicized as you already know, nonetheless you insist in doing it any other way. You can do whatever Tasken, once you are free to edit as I am. All the best that life can offer you Tasken. Krenakarore TK 20:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Please, wait till I'm done or sleep
Talk:Curvature

message: If (signed) curvature of a plane curve is the first derivative of tangent angle with respect to arc length, is there a common word for the next derivative, i.e. the first derivative of curvature? —Tamfang (talk) 19:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Torsion of a curve? –jacobolus (t) 20:59, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I now bolded the thing you may have missed. —Tamfang (talk) 21:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  The next-derivative analog of curvature (a naturally bivector-valued quantity) is torsion (a naturally trivector-valued quantity). In the plane of course torsion vanishes (any wedge product of 3 coplanar vectors is 0). You can come up with various other planar concepts involving higher derivatives, but IMO they aren’t really natural analogs of curvature. –jacobolus (t) 03:00, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

text: Raph Levien's thesis has a lot of analysis about changes in curvature with respect to arclength, but I am not sure if there are any specific names like what you are looking for.  –jacobolus (t) 03:08, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Heh, reading Levien's work prompted the question. —Tamfang (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Next time I see him, I’ll try to remember to ask if there’s a name for this. No promises though. –jacobolus (t) 02:34, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  the next derivative
Talk:Han dynasty

message: This is a brilliantly written article, though I have found a problem. Many images in the History section violate WP:SANDWICH. If there is a good soul who is knowledgable about the Han dynasty and could fix this that would be highly appreciated. Cheers! Wretchskull (talk) 10:12, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image problems 

message: May I ask how were the sources compiled after Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution? A lot of ancient Chinese history was destroyed! 190.218.30.203 (talk) 03:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: China had a lot of history to start off with so what remained was still substantial. Senorangel (talk) 20:56, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources problem 

message: Why isn't Taiwan shown as coming under control of the Han dynasty in the map? Ubikwit 連絡 見学/迷惑 15:12, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I also have the same question, it is at least a consensus in the Chinese historical community that Taiwan belongs to the control of the Han Dynasty. Fibre of paramecium (talk) 15:39, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it really? Our article History of Taiwan claims the first possible contact was during the Sui dynasty, while the first outposts date only to the Yuan dynasty. Baidu's article on Taiwan mentions a possibility of contact during the Three Kingdoms period, but nowhere is there any claim that Han dynasty China was even aware of Taiwan, much less in control of it. Are there new archaeological discoveries that all these articles have missed? What are your sources for this reputed consensus in the Chinese historical community? Folly Mox (talk) 10:36, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan
Talk:Gil Scott-Heron

message: On findagrave.com it states Heron was cremated and his ashes given to a family relative or friend.  Can anyone confirm he is bored at the said cemetery by taking a photo and uploading it? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:f00a:bc00:28ed:feb:eb9:c382 (talk) 22:37, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial 

message: Problem is no mention of gsh and the classic rap tune, "The Bottle." Why? Unacceptable gap hiatus. Gil re-recorded the song as disco with Salsoul in 1978. Have a copy. Salsoul is never mentioned either in any bio. Why? The tune was also a 1974 hit in Canada. Huh? What is wrong with wiki and this incomplete aspect of the bio? Please check and correct. The song was social activism and alcoholism in the black community. Significant omission, imo. Very sorry. Needs attention. JS. 2601:145:8003:2930:84EE:9B76:6194:8CD7 (talk) 06:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gil Scott Heron on Salsoul records 

message: Categories include being an alum of this school, but it's not verifiable per current article. Is there a source so we can mention in body? BobFromBrockley (talk) 10:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ethical Culture School]]
Talk:Ulysses (novel)

message: The description of this episode’s style is accurate enough but the ascribed authorial motive, i.e., to [reflect] the nervous exhaustion and confusion of the two protagonists,” is of secondary importance to Joyce’s obvious intention of parodying the late-nineteenth century style of popular fiction, amateurishly intrusive and familiar, that Bloom himself would have admired and emulated. Orthotox (talk) 22:31, 12 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eumaeus: "rambling and laboured style of the narrative" 

message: There's still a week left to address the issues at Wikipedia_talk:Selected_anniversaries/June_16#What,_no_mention_of_Bloomsday? and rescue Bloomsday for the main page. Sparafucil (talk) 22:09, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: On this (Blooms)day
Talk:Molly Bloom's soliloquy

message: Is there any reason why this information couldn't be merged with the Ulysses (novel) article?
I'm hard pressed to think of other examples where a portion of the novel is so significant that it deserves a separate article.  The only one I can think of is The Grand Inquisitor section of the Brothers Karamazov, but that section is so significant it's even been published as a stand-alone work.  I realize that Molly's soliloquy is probably the most quoted section of Ulysses, but even so, what makes this section more important than, say, the windmill episode of Don Quixote, Dante's journey to the ninth circle of hell, Captain Ahab meeting Moby Dick, or other famous sections of novels for which no articles exist? --Rsl12 (talk) 17:23, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the page, along with all your comments (some of which still sound very helpful and potentially fruitful) to the Molly Bloom page proper. If this is still a big issue, feel free to message me. --Artimaean (talk) 22:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be deleted?
Talk:Canberra

message: Something's wrong with the Openstreet map. It shows the Atlantic ocean instead of the city.PAper GOL (talk) 15:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  OpenStreet Map 

message: Why not use proper census data and revert back to 2021. The population is woefully underestimated. 1.157.21.148 (talk) 12:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population completely wrong 

message: Going through the random orphaned pages link, I found an article about an artist from Canberra. I've also noticed that several articles about towns or cities often have sections about notable people whom were born or lived there. The article about Canberra doesn't, and even if it did, I would not be able to edit it seen as it is a semi-protected page and I have not made enough edits to contribute to semi-protected pages yet. Could someone fix this? Bradicalguy (talk) 03:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This article does not have a list of notable people and it would be deleted if anybody tried to create it in order to preserve its FA rating. Even it existed, thousands of people would qualify ahead of Chris Walrus Dalzell. The Dalzell article was lucky to survive a deletion nomination.--Grahame (talk) 07:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned page about an artist from Canberra
Talk:List of tunnels in the Netherlands

message: This list is basically a directory of tunnels, without regard to sources or notability. I would suggest it be trimmed back to tunnels already having WP articles, and that someone fascinated by the subject could add back tunnels, without redlinks, but with sources showing that they at least exist.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:47, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability issues
Talk:Poverty in the United States

message: — Assignment last updated by Roach619 (talk) 05:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Sustainable Futures

message: — Assignment last updated by MayaLis1 (talk) 18:33, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Global Poverty and Practice
Talk:Oud

message: Naming the oud from the Arabic language, and the oud: every wood, minute or thick, and wet or dry. Is not perisan or sanskrit word. Sarazxs123 (talk) 18:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name oud 

message: Ho sin hosinzadh 5.123.177.78 (talk) 17:18, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hosin
Talk:Panguingue

message: According to this website,it said Panguingue origin is mid 1800s.
Panguingue (pronounced "pan-ginn'-gay"), often called Pan for short, was a staple of the gambling halls during the Californian gold rush in the mid-1800's, and this Rummy variation remains popular in many regions, particularly in the western United States and Southern Florida. It's an unusual game, and has its own unique lingo (see Panguingue glossary).
http://www.rummy-games.com/rules/panguingue.html
Is this mid 1800s card game mention here is really Panguingue or is it the ancestor of Panguingue  and all rummy card games which is Conquian.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShanghaiWu (talk • contribs) 14:52, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Panguingue date origin

message: Pretty poor explanation of rules in general, but not explaining how you can add cards to melds is a big oversight. 2601:282:2180:28D0:BDE7:32D9:5655:EFD (talk) 20:09, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing about adding cards to already formed melds?
Talk:Cardia

message: This article needs to be diverged into "lower esophageal sphincter" and "cardia". There is no controversy, the gastric cardia is now clearly considered to be part of the stomach. Because of its generality, it does however overlap with the LES. By definition however it does not contain the LES. The previous citations are erraneous and point to random labs and patient education articles, which should not be used as primary sources. In the medical and surgical community there is no debate about this issue. I have done my best to update the article but I don't have time at the moment to create the separate article LES.UberMD (talk) 04:04, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: I'm not sure where this article was madse, but in the States, we refer to this junction as the gastro-esophageal junction or the cardio-esophageal junction. Cardia means hert. The cardiac region of the stomach is the most proximal region, closest to the heart, hence the name. I think this should be renawed to the brain.
There are 4 regions of the stomach: The cardia, fundus, antrum and pylorus.
:I tried a search in yahoo and find cardia like similar to LES ( Low Esophagical Sphincter) :?
I am now more confused than ever. In reading various sources, there seems to be no agreement as to whether the cardia is part of the stomach, part of the intestine, or a little bit of both. Histologically, it is part of the stomach, meaning that its mucosal cells are stomach cells, not esophageal cells. Here are 2 diagrams that explain the ambiguity.
statkit1 10:50 Mar 17, 2003 (UTC)
This page should have a link allowing people to redirect to :  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardia_%28Thrace%29  --->  I had to do a google search to find the wikipedia article.
Joey 17:37, 4 March 2006 (UTC
In modern anatomical and physiological terms he cardia is the superior portion of the stomach.  The LES is a "physiologic sphincter" - anatomicaly it is not a discrete thing - its made of of muscles from the stomach and esophagus.  Therefore - LES should be its own entry and cardia should be merged with stomach--128.125.97.65 21:45, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old

message: Several types of medicines affect the sphincter, leading to their contraindication in cases of gastric reflux, could we add them to the article? 79.145.199.212 (talk) 11:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If documented in reliable sources.  WLU (talk) 12:22, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Medicines

message: Please read this famous pathologists theory of the cardia and how more pathologists are supporting his theories.  http://chandrasoma.com/page.php?id=6
I believe the information in his recent papers are relevant for this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.43.212.236 (talk) 02:37, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  cardia controversial 

message: Should "crus of the diaphragm" link to Crus of diaphragm?
Teknikal224 (talk) 19:25, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to [[Crus of diaphragm]]?
Talk:List of human anatomical features

message: I suggest include Gray´s public domain anatomy images ( at least, the more general ones).
----
This page badly needs a visual representation of the different systems in relation to where they exist in the human body. In addition, the page title should probably be "List of human anatomical systems", since the page talks about "systems" and not "features". Roedelius 19:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this page is essentially a copy of this page: http://tripatlas.com/List_of_human_anatomical_features
It isn't even credited
122.2.86.194 (talk) 03:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  plagiarism
Talk:Grammy Awards

message: This announcement has just been issued by The Recording Academy. I'm at a loss as to where add this or to not mention this at all Lord Clayton7 (talk) 03:37, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where to add the latest change in the nomination process, where 'secret committees' were dissolved? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: 
* http://customerservice.recordingacademy.com/support/solutions/articles/63000268321-grammy-official-awards-rules-guidelines
* https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/who-votes-for-the-grammys-how-academy-voting-process-nominations-winners-a8182621.html
Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Zzyzx11 (talk) 08:14, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: A discussion is currently taking place regarding the suitability of The Grammys for regular posting on the main page under the section "In the News." Interested editors are encouraged to join the discussion here. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: The Grammys on the Main Page
Talk:Lebanon War

message: This page is a disambiguation page and should not be confused with List of wars involving Lebanon, which needs to be created and might include also "non-wars" like conflicts and operations, but putting them here is just creating a confusion. Per WP:GF i will be happy to help create such a list.Greyshark09 (talk) 20:26, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Try the list, could be good. FunkMonk (talk) 01:43, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Check this out List of wars involving Lebanon, you are welcome to modify, edit and add info. I just want to draw your attention that we need to merge War of the hotels into Battle of the Hotels, and that 1860 conflict couldn't involve Lebanon (state), as Lebanon certainly didn't exist at the time as a state (it was Eylayet of Sidon and Eylayet of Damascus, part of Ottoman Empire).Greyshark09 (talk) 07:04, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig page
Draft talk:List of songs whose title appears more than twenty times in the lyrics

message: Does "Alice in Chains" really have a song "Again"? If so, they could join Lenny Kravitz in the list of sets of unrelated songs with identical titles or whatever it's called. Wiwaxia 04:01, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: They do (did). It's on the 1995 self-titled album. -- 80.171.119.217 23:41, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Alice in Chains: "Again"

message: Does anyone else think the formatting of this article makes the entries unnecessarily and excessively spaced, and its layout could use some condensing? I don't want to change it  if I'm alone on this, but it does seem like it could be condensed without losing any information whatsoever. -R. fiend 06:10, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting

message: Do extended versions of songs count on this list if their titles exceed a count of 20 times in the lyrics while the original length versions were under 20 count of? this does not include the extention of the title in brackets.  Here is what I mean, "Burn Rubber" counts 1, however, "Burn Rubber" counts 1 in "Burn Rubber (extended mix)" as well. --SuperDude 03:37, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended versions 

message: ====List of songs whose title appears more than twenty times in the lyrics====
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs whose title appears more than twenty times in the lyrics
Ditto. Ordinary deletionism is bad enough, but disappointing all those contributors who have made a total of 514 (!) edits to this article is more than I can stomach. You can't be serious. I just can't believe that List of songs deemed inappropriate by Clear Channel following the September 11, 2001 attacks is allowed to survive while this article has to go. Who gives a damn about Clear Channel? What is Clear Channel? <KF> 01:43, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: from [[Wikipedia:Deletion review]] ([[October 31]], [[2005]])

message: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs whose title appears more than twenty times in the lyrics
Ditto. Ordinary deletionism is bad enough, but disappointing all those contributors who have made a total of 514 (!) edits to this article is more than I can stomach. You can't be serious. I just can't believe that List of songs deemed inappropriate by Clear Channel following the September 11, 2001 attacks is allowed to survive while this article has to go. Who gives a damn about Clear Channel? What is Clear Channel? <KF> 01:43, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[List of songs whose title appears more than twenty times in the lyrics]]
Talk:Heller myotomy

message: Does "myotomy" refer only to this procedure, or (as the name suggests) to any procedure in which muscle is cut? If so, this page should be moved to Heller myotomy. - Montréalais 
     
This is what Richard had done.  User:69.22.126.93
--The above discussion is several years old. Everything seems to be in the right place now.Sssuuuzzzaaannn 03:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chiropractic

message: The section "History" could use an update if sources are available.
Looks like the most recent info in that section is from 10+ years ago.
- 189.122.84.88 (talk) 18:49, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The section "History" could use an update 

message: Remove "based of pseudoscientific ides" as chiropractic is evidence based. 
The anti vaccine remark is unnecessary. There is no link between chiropractic and anti vaccine sentiment. 70.21.191.175 (talk) 06:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: . No sources given, no prior consensus for change. Bon courage (talk) 06:25, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 February 2024