Talk:Pola Uddin, Baroness Uddin

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 22:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Looks like Uddin is one of six individuals that are going to be charged with fraud, I'll update the entry when the DPP announces it, the Daily Telegraph already have the details and are getting ready to go to print atm, supposedly any Lord will now be stripped of their peerage if guilty under the new government specifically post-dated to the 2009 'mp expenses' scandal as exposed by the TelegraphTwobells (talk) 22:42, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prosecution 

message: This woman has apparently returned to the House of Lords today (14/11/2011) despite repaying a single penny of the £125,000 she stole from UK taxpayers  [<http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2061006/Shamed-peer-allowed-House-Lords-despite-failing-repay-penny-125-000-false-expenses.html>]. Worse still, she will be entitled to £300 A DAY for doing so.  She claims she is too poor to repay anything, despite owning 3 properties.  A ruling by the committee for privileges and conduct in the Lords says that it would be illegal to make her return conditional on the repayment of the money, and appears to have warned that such an arrangement would amount to a permanent ban, which would infringe her right as a peer to be called to the House by the Queen at the start of a parliament.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.70.225.110 (talk) 01:44, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've refactored this post so that it doesn't run afoul of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons.  I cannot tell if the balance of the message is an edit request or commentary on British parliamentary shortcomings. Tiderolls 07:20, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

text: Strictly speaking, article talk pages are not a forum for discussion or comment on the article subject.  The talk page is for discussion on article improvement.  I usually don't concern myself with the odd, stray post unless the message violates a policy (as the original message did), or the post is overly rant-ish.  However, another editor may see the situation differently and remove posts that do not adhere to Wikipedia's guideline on talk page use (found at Talk page guidelines).  Regards Tiderolls 04:56, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Uddin Returns to the House of Lords 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Pola Uddin, Baroness Uddin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090522165220/http://www.womeninpubliclifeawards.co.uk:80/shortlist.html to http://www.womeninpubliclifeawards.co.uk/shortlist.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:26, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pola Uddin, Baroness Uddin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707212808/http://www.baronessuddin.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=14&Itemid=198 to http://www.baronessuddin.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=14&Itemid=198
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The claim "first Muslim and second asian woman to sit in parliament" has had "citation required" against it for 18 months.  Is it time to remove the claim?  Busabalc (talk) 20:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As no-one has dissented, I'll edit out the claim without a citation and clarify political allegiance which has a citation in the body of the article. Busabalc (talk) 16:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First whatever