Talk:Mark of the Christian

message: User:Anthony.bradbury - can you give me some specifics please so that I may correct the article so that it can stay in Wikipedia. I look forward to your suggestions, comments, and/or questions :-)  --Awinger48 22:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see that as an issue.  It could use more material about the book and more citations to the secondary literature upon the text.  I deprodded while coming along on prod patrol.  Maybe their are issues with tone, but I don't see them.  GRBerry 00:58, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: GRBerry Thank you Sir. Your suggestions are much appreciated, and if you want to participate in the editing (read your User page), you are most welcome :-) --Awinger48 11:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reads Like a Sermon

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.ccel.us/schaeffer.html
*:Triggered by \bccel\.us\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:19, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Thanks for all who have contributed to this article. As Schaeffer's final new disciple at Swiss L'Abri before he died, I carry on his development of his "final apologetic." The specific Mark of the Christian is purely intra-ecclesial love within the church for other Christians. That is Schaeffer's focus in this book. He mentions love to all humans as a concession to show that love is not restricted only within the Church, but that does not change the topic of love within the Church (the "mark" of the Christian). 
There is more than one love command (cf., e.g., Augustine's ordo amoris, the ordering of different loves). C. S. Lewis points out the problems caused by disordered loves. Jesus taught some loves as more important than others. And the title and main topic of Schaeffer's book is the one love command dealing particularly with that of Christians for one another. Thus it is a categorical confusion to say, as does the article, that this mark-of-the-Christian love deals with those outside the Church.
Schaeffer's book observes this distinction, and this article inaccurately presents otherwise. "So, when Jesus gives the special command to love our Christian brothers ["The Mark of the Christian"], it does not negate the other command. The two are not antithetical. We are not to choose between loving all men as ourselves and loving the Christian in a special way. The two commands reinforce each other" (http://www.ccel.us/schaeffer.html). 
I suggest our revising the text of the 1st line of the 3rd paragraph in order to preserve Schaeffer's nuance between the specially intra-ecclesial love that is the topic of the book and any other loves that he must mention in order to prevent accusations that he is trying to limit love. Perhaps something like ". . . that, while this particular category of love is just for other Christians alone, Christians are also to love all men as well." Olorin3k (talk) 13:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflates Two Different Love Commands