lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dilbert

message: This really should have Ratbert in the characters list, because he is a major character in Dilbert. 56KPK (talk) 11:27, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - added. Ckruschke (talk) 18:06, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

text: Not only Ratbert but Catbert.  The eminent web-site  dilbert.com maintains a full list of seventeen Fishing Publication (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Fishing Publication, both Ratbert and Catbert are listed in the article. Schazjmd (talk) 19:14, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why doesn't this have Ratbert? 

message: The Poll That Did in Dilbert Creator Scott Adams Is Even Dumber Than You Can Imagine Doug Weller talk 19:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Really Slate news circular-referencing New York Times namecalling is the best they have against this poll ?   I've heard the argument that It's okay to be white is a dogwhistle or invalid because it apparently originated on 4chan, if this is true, I really am not sure that the man on the Clapham omnibus would be familiar with this esoteric internet lore (and respond to poll questions in accordance) ...   this is like when people on the Right talk about the coroner's report which described George Floyd  if I remember correctly as having traces of fentanyl, methamphetamine and so on at the time of his death --  you can cast aspersions about technical subjects but the principle is the same, the issue is there (police brutality, anti-White hatred) and we should talk openly and honestly about it -- my two cents. If you're looking for support to include this in the article, I don't oppose it, we should also include anything from Rasmussen if they've issued a statement (from what I understand the poll has been widely discussed)  or an opposing perspective Fishing Publication (talk) 13:02, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  That poll 

message: Looks like dilbert.com is no longer found as a DNS entry (A, AAAA and CNAME records are blank), though it is still shown by whois as registered domain. 84.198.244.196 (talk) 06:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dilbert.com missing from DNS
Talk:Dartmouth

message: Yes, most American's ignorance of British place names is a government inspired plan to reduce cultural dependence on the former colonial power. Not to mention to make for better crossword puzzles. --MichaelTinkler
:Indeed.  Perhaps, while we're at it, we should redirect Boston to Boston, Lincolnshire so to correct the injustice done this town of a bit more than 27,000.  After all, being the first to be named, it's surely "altogether more significant" than the other Bostons around the world.  Oh, and who would think about "marathon" as the name of a sport?  The whole world wants to know every last detail about the 8,488 people who call Marathon, Greece home.  Hey, let's get rid of disambiguation pages altogether!  After all, it's Wikipedia's job to educate people on the proper cultural norms eminating from Europe, as nothing notable has been produced in the past 500 years -- particularly not from the uncouth savages of the New World.
:London is calling.  It would be "cultural imperialism" to fail to heed her call. -- SwissCelt 01:54, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

message: If someone can add a bit about DSM-5-TR, while being mindful of the APA's copyright, here are a couple of articles that will help:
Appelbaum PS, Leibenluft E, Kendler KS. Iterative Revision of the DSM: An Interim Report From the DSM-5 Steering Committee. Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Nov 1;72(11):1348-1349. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202100013. Epub 2021 Apr 22. PMID: 33882702.
First MB, Yousif LH, Clarke DE, Wang PS, Gogtay N, Appelbaum PS. DSM-5-TR: overview of what's new and what's changed. World Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;21(2):218-219. doi: 10.1002/wps.20989. PMID: 35524596; PMCID: PMC9077590.
Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) [he/him] 04:13, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had a go expanding the DSM-5-TR section. Thanks for the references :) Darcyisverycute (talk) 05:54, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  DSM-5-TR 

message: I'm HAVEING ALOT OF issues mental health and behavioral health and RITE before my drs husband show very uncommon professional conduct an took it on his self to take away all 12 mental health meds that I ONCES had been on an TAKEING ATLEAST I was getting thru even my really bad times and it all were controlled then it's not even doing me no differant now days like it ONCES WAS working now if I was to get all of my meds back I do know that I won't be HAVEING all of my day to day issues near as badly as I'm HAVEING to try to make it daily cold turkey without no help 50.96.164.89 (talk) 08:13, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well said I agree 49.197.107.32 (talk) 13:53, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I know at the moment I've do got ATLEAST 12 mental health issues maybe more. And I've been without a Dr. Mental health conditions now almost a yr now 

message: — Assignment last updated by Docscharn (talk) 21:59, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing 101-The Archive

message: Hi all! Hope you are well. I'm messaging here because I'll likely be making some edits over the next two months on this page as a part of a class assignment. Particularly, I plan to add to or clarify text from the Critique subsections "Obscuring the Root Causes of Psychological Distress" & "Overdiagnosis." I'll be mainly staying out of the way of the larger stuff, so I hope I can contribute to the knowledge base in smaller, more subtle ways. I want to thank you in advance for your suggestions... I appreciate your patience while I figure out Wikipedia :) Klrgmclass (talk) 02:42, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing This Page For a Class! 

message: — Assignment last updated by Liliput000 (talk) 00:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Race, Gender, and Medicine
Talk:Decibel

message: In the page it is stated that 1 dBd equals 2.15 dBi. Unfortunately, this is only true in free space. At ground levels, depending on the antenna height, this can be 6-7 dBi. 5.168.129.245 (talk) 16:49, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  dBd vs dBi for antennas 

message: :The article has not qualified for B-class since tagged "citation needed" in 2008 (also February 2021). There is also a "clarification needed" tag dated March 2018. This is a technical article with a lot of formulas that need sourcing. Reassess to C-class.  --  Otr500 (talk) 00:53, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Article issues and classification

message: In radio receivers, dBμ is commonly used dB relative to 1μV at the specified impedance. (75 or 300 ohms for TV and FM, 50 ohms for some other radios.)  I don't even know if μ is allowed in article titles. This page could discuss it, and other voltage relative units (with a known impedance). Gah4 (talk) 21:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Good observation. It raises the following issue: if dBm implicitly refers to milliwatt and dBμ to microvolt, would it not be more reasonable to adopt the convention of explicitly writing the unit, as in dBmW and dBμV? Then one can also write dBmV and dBμW without ambiguity. All these suffixes to dB are nonstandard anyway, so one might as well do it cleany. Boute (talk) 14:41, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  dBμ
Talk:Tao Te Ching

message: Re 
:2.5 Themes	Edit
The text concerns itself with the Dao (or "Way"), and how it is expressed... This section should make up 60-80% of the article. Let us expand it. Zezen (talk) 05:50, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content too short 

message: * .
This is a pretty thorough treatment of the TTC's treatment in French, which has been influential on its reception in English and across Europe. In particular, it's obviously hilariously misguided but nonetheless important and worth mentioning that the Jesuits and other Christian sinologists got reaaaaaaaaaally hung upas in for centurieson a passage that talks about 1→2→3 and the myriad things coming from the three + another with the three characters 夷希微 (Yíxīwēi) taken to be a transcription of the tetragrammaton YHWH. We shouldn't gloss it as anything remotely accurate, but it's still worth mentioning in the article, given its influence on the Jesuit & al.'s handling of the classic, bumping it up several notches in importance vs the Chinese opinion at the time, which thought it was fine and all but it wasn't on the test so... maybe something to read in retirement. — LlywelynII 04:48, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion

message: The content of the book (manuscript) must be described in the article. Jestmoon(talk) 18:12, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content
Talk:Stab-in-the-back myth

message: I've added a section on various assessments of the actual military situation in November 1918. I think it is important to provide context to claims made by e.g., Ludendorff as to what the situation actually was. Please review and amend it as appropriate.
In a number of articles we have on this period the claim that the German frontier had not been crossed by Allied forces is made. This is clearly incorrect based on the map of the western front produced by West Point (who presumably are a reliable source for this) showing that the German frontier of 1914 had been crossed in at least 3 places by 11 November. If what is meant is that the frontier of 1869 had not been crossed, well, the relevance of this is not clear - Alsace Lorraine was the German frontier in 1914 and is surely the relevant reference point. I've struck this claim out - the German frontier was crossed, albeit only in a few places and in relatively shallow penetrations. FOARP (talk) 13:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Does it really matter whether the frontier was crossed? See this section on the German economy during World War I. Food shortages throughout the war, widespread severe malnutrition, widespread typhus, shortages of coal, imports cut off by the British blockade, shortages in civilian clothing, shortages of soap, shortages of hot water, reduction of public transportation and street lighting, overcrowded housing in the industrial cities, and little or no recreation due to the closing down of theaters and cabarets. The deterioration of living conditions would result in further deaths and further discontent, regardless of what happened on the battlefield. Dimadick (talk) 02:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  - It matters if the claim is being made, in the voice of Wikipedia, that this was the case, when it was in fact not the case. But more specifically I think the idea is that Germany did not "lose" because of this "fact". Otherwise I largely agree with what you've written - reviewing the lead section we possibly under-play the degree to which historians, whilst agreeing that the stab-in-the-back is a myth, do agree that the economic collapse and collapse in morale on the home front was a cause of the German defeat. FOARP (talk) 08:46, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added section on military situation, plus claim that German frontier was not crossed
Talk:Deism

message: Here is a cite: Williams, George H. “Socinianism and Deism: From Eschatological Elitism To Universal Immortality?” Historical Reflections / Réflexions Historiques, vol. 2, no. 2, 1976, pp. 265–290. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/41298669. Accessed 18 Apr. 2021. Hyperbolick (talk) 02:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add [[Socinianism]]
Talk:DJ

message: I have changed this article from a disambiguation page back to a redirect because almost all of the existing 160 links refer to disc jockey. I have created the alternate DJ (disambiguation). RedWolf 07:44, Apr 16, 2004 (UTC)
: Yeah. Someone had reverted it without explanation inbetween and didn't even bother to fix the double redirect; I reverted that change now. --Shallot 10:57, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change from disambiguation back to redirect
Talk:Diamond

message: Wow, is this a bad article. The lead states:"Because the arrangement of atoms in diamond is extremely rigid, few types of impurity can contaminate it (two exceptions are boron and nitrogen)." This is absolute rubbish. It isn't its "rigidity" that gives bulk diamond its impermeability (if that's what is meant by contamination). It is easy to "contaminate" a diamond CVD film with you name it. How big is the difference between contaminating a 1 inch cube (say) of pure iron vs. pure diamond? Not much. Ion implantation into (the near surface of) a diamond is also trivial. If the editors meant that NATURAL diamonds (on Earth) are typically quite pure, then SAY THAT! I suspect, but just an ignorant suspicion, that diamond must transition between impure high-carbon 'stuff' to the pure allotrope. I expect that at some point there's LOTS of contaminants in the nascent diamond. Aren't most natural diamonds black? What's that?? (the preceding is a digression, I'm ignorant on their natural occurrence.) There are so many FALSE statements in this article that it needs a total rewrite. There are many other bloopers but I don't have the patience to list them all. (For instance, did you know that hydrogen will leave an ash when burnt? No? Well, just read this article. When a diamond burns (in O2), any contaminants are left as ash. Ridiculous. (as is the assumption of complete combustion of the carbon) Another false claim is that diamond contains the most atoms per unit volume. (aside: at first, I thought the editor meant per unit cell volume!, not sure why s/he used the word "unit" since it doesn't add clarity (but it is not wrong)). Estimates of hydrogen density in the sun's core is ~10,000 kg/m^3, and without qualifying pressure and temperature the claim is likely false. I could go on...)40.142.183.146 (talk) 20:59, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't forget that vinyl will wear down a diamond!! 203.221.187.176 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 21:17, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Diamond (side view).png, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 30, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-12-30. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 13:32, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD 

message: Please advise employees to confirm w office before removing landscaping. Thx 74.134.14.7 (talk) 18:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diamonds landscaping
Talk:Doubravka of Bohemia

message: Shouldn't this article be moved to Dubravka? Dubrawka may be a Polish or German spelling but since she was Bohemian, I suppose we should use Czech spelling which I guess is Dubravka (there is no W in the Czech language except in words of foreign origin). --Kpalion 12:03, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubrawka or Dubravka?

message: Is the information about a "golden loincloth" reliable? In the Polish version there is a "golden head band". It seems much more plausible.
--Jidu Boite (talk) 13:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Golden loincloth? 

message: suggest to remove the paragraph which briefly flags the controversy over Doubravka's role in introduction of Christianity in the Mieszko's state. It is definitely worth mentioning, but in a specific sub-section of the narrative (perhaps Historiographic reception???). In the lead it seems to be out of place. The lead is supposed to provide brief and introductory information, not to dive into historiographic disputes. Regards, --89.76.22.216 (talk) 00:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: baptism issue in the lead
Talk:Determinant

message: The Example about "In a triangular matrix, the product of the main diagonal is the determinant"
There are many triangular matrices which can be derived. Unless you state more constraints (e.g. Hermite Normal Form or alike), you cannot simply postulate that the diagonal product is the determinant. 
For example, if I produce some (remember - it is not unique) upper triangular matrix with row operations, instead of column operations, I cannot reproduce the findings in the example. 
So, either constraints or insights are clearly missing.
2003:E5:2709:8B91:29A5:FE96:3F33:E513 (talk) 07:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, in any upper or lower triangular matrix, the determinant is the product of the main diagonal:  all the terms in the expansion of the determinant along any column are 0 except for the term involving the cofactor determined by the matrix entry at the intersection of the column and the main diagonal -- and by induction the determinant of that cofactor is the product of its main diagonal (which is the rest of the diagonal of the full matrix). The explanation following the example tacitly assumes that the matrix is nonsingular, but the claim remains true for singular triangular matrices as well. -- Elphion (talk) 14:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article wrong by many omissions?
Talk:Deuterium

message: Hello, 
Are there any other ways of producing/extracting deuterium besides electrolytis?  The product should be of high concentration because it is meant for fusion energy.
Thank you for your help Maurice Herp. (talk) 20:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deuterium 

message: The article could make mention of the 327-MHz deuterium hyperfine transition, particularly in an astronomy context (Cf. hydrogen line). Thanks. Praemonitus (talk) 22:24, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperfine transition 

message: Would it make more sense for File:Deuterium discharage tube.jpg to be used as the lead image instead, or maybe along with, the isotope highlighted on the table of nuclides? After all, we don't just put images of elements highlighted on the periodic table for their lede sections. ✨ΩmegaMantis✨blather 18:30, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: does not seem to prescribe any standard for the image. Might be useful to ask Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements to coordinate this across the many such articles. DMacks (talk) 19:35, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Deuterium glow tube be used for lede image? 

message: IUPAC recommends that the chemical symbol for deuterium should be H, rather than D. I strongly agree with that recommendation, for multiple reasons. This article should follow IUPAC's recommendation; for instance, writing HO rather than DO (see "Heavy water"). Solomonfromfinland (talk) 22:02, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symbol
Talk:Digital subscriber line

message: I see that the titles Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line, Integrated Services Digital Network, Asynchronous Transfer Mode, Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line, and Digital Subscriber Line
are all capitalized.  These articles tend to have lots of incorrectly capitalized letters in the body of the article, and that makes me suspect that someone may have written them as capitals under the incorrect impression that the Wikipedia convention is to capitalize words in article titles?  What is going on?  Michael Hardy 21:23, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Caps

message: The first paragraph on the DSL page makes some claims that I haven't heard elsewhere.  Some sources are needed for it(news reports, historical studies, etc.).  It's good writing, and interesting, but it needs to be sourced. 
The paragraph:
"Its origin dates back to 1988, when an engineer at Bell research lab deviced a way to carry digital signal over the unused frequency spectrum. This allows ordinary phone line to provide digital communication without blocking access to voice services. Bells management however were not enthusiastic about it as it was not as profitable as renting out a second line for those consumers who prefered to still have acess to the phone when dialing out. This however changed in the late 90s when cable companies started marketing broadband internet access. Realising that most consumers would prefer broadband over a second dial out line, Bell companies rushed out the DSL technology that they had been sitting on for the past decade as an attempt to slow broadband internet access uptake." - diff
(Also posted on User talk:Wk muriithi)
JesseW 19:48, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: wk muriithi replied on my talk page saying he got it from "Crafting and Executing strategy 14th edition by Arthur A. Thompson Jr.".  If someone who has a copy could verify this, and add it as a footnote(use Wikipedia:Footnote3 style) that would be great.  Thanks for replying, Wk! JesseW 05:34, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  DSL history - sources?
Talk:David A. Huffman

message: I have a photo that David gave me years ago. I think he would like it to be the one on his Wikipedia entry: http://www.thunder-monkey.com/david_huffman-lg.jpg
I have no idea how to put it into the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.36.249.35 (talk) 23:35, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: The History section on the Huffman Coding page contradicts what is given here (and seems to be correct). --weemadarthur 198.152.14.67 (talk) 10:04, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "History" 

message: Some of this article is copied from . Snippet search on google confirms that other text is copied from . (See ) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:23, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I reported the issue to Moonriddengirl. I'm working on a rewrite, not finished yet. See Talk:David A. Huffman/Temp. -- SchreyP  (messages) 21:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

text: Current temp version good enough to be merged with old article. For more details and potential new copyvio, see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 July 5. -- SchreyP  (messages) 21:52, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Decipherment

message: This page is clearly not a disambiguation article, so where should a link to Decipher, Inc. go? --IanWatson 23:44, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decipher, Inc. 

message: http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:7jmYpJoTv3EJ:www.bluhorizonlines.org/icon/icon6.html+decipherment+-wikipedia+mathemathical+theory&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nasz (talk • contribs) 11:18, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  statistics 

message: Wow, this page doesn't get much traffic. 
Anyway, I linked the orphan Combinatorial method (linguistics) here. Not advocating it, but it could probably use some fresh air. kwami (talk) 05:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to orphan 

message: Onceinawhile (talk) 14:22, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving text here that relates to other topics - this is not a disambiguation page
Talk:DrinkOrDie

message: I think this article could do with a bit of word-smithing; however, it's right on the money.  The form of the "also-charged" list seems a tad bland though.  Additionally, a few of the links have "moved with no forwarding address", and could probably stand to be alphabetised (given that dating died about two links in to the effort).  What to do to make it better... Orethrius 05:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite?