lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Orley Farm (novel)

message: Trollope's unflattering Jewish characters, both here and in other novels (e.g. Emilius in The Eustace Diamonds), do show a marked anti-semitism on his part, typical of his time. However, the portrayal of barristers as unscrupulous hardly constitutes strong evidence. Clarityfiend 04:15, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-semitism

message: "The house in the book became a school, which was originally supposed to be the feeder school to Harrow School. It is called Orley Farm School, which Trollope allowed to be named after his book.
This passage from the school website reads: In 1851 the school transferred to a house called "Sunnyside" in Sudbury Hill and began taking boarders, then in the late 1850s, Edward Hastings purchased an additional house, "Julians". Unbeknown to him, this property had previously belonged to the family of Anthony Trollope, and when that author faithfully described it in his famous novel of 1862, "Orley Farm", Hastings recognised the description and sought – and gained – the author's permission to change the name of his school to Orley Farm."
NOne of this is referenced and imo is not the stuff that leads should be made of. Too much information about something that does not  pertain  to the novel really. perhaps it should go somewhere but not in the lead. thats my opinion. If I'm wrong, sorry, and it can easy be put back. Sayerslle (talk) 22:26, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead material
Talk:WildStorm

message: The article says 1999, but I started getting paid by DC in October of 1998. I worked at Wildstorm from 1992 to late 1999. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tighelander (talk • contribs) 06:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official start of DC's ownership of Wildstorm? 

message: Are Wildstorm characters/comics creator owned? Just wondering.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.134.162.57 (talk) 22:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creator owned? 

message: These sources might be useful for creating the article or demonstrating notability:
* http://www.bleedingcool.com/2010/09/21/how-dc-comics-killed-wildstorm/
* http://comicsalliance.com/wildstorm-history-jim-lee/
--Odie5533 (talk) 16:15, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Wild Times: An Oral History of Wildstorm Studios is an apparently self-published book by one Joseph Hedges. I don't have a copy yet, but I'd hazard a guess that it could provide a source for some or all of the un-sourced claims in this article. I know self-published works don't usually pass muster at Wikipedia, but fan press is often one of the few sources for information for comic books. It seems to me it might be adequate for citing non-contentious claims. Klintron23 (talk) 04:34, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Wild Times: An Oral History of Wildstorm Studios a reliable source for purposes of this article?
Talk:Final Fantasy XI: Treasures of Aht Urhgan

message: This is bull. I was the one who originally created this page.
Should this really have its own Wikipedia page?  Look at how short the article is... couldn't someone just merge it with the Final Fantasy XI article? Just a thought... 199.1.40.18 23:49, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

message: Same deal here as with the main article.  I am adding this now to help stave off the invasion any second now of excited fans updating the news.  I will add a link to the playonline website about the job as soon as it's available. -RaCha'ar 04:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Puppetmaster

message: Same deal here as with the COP article.  No sources have been added and the person who added the sections to this and the COP article has not responded to a message left on his talk page.  I will be removing the entire Reception section as POV and original research very soon if this is left untouched. -RaCha'ar 05:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article's Reception section has some serious problems.  I strongly disagree with some of the statements, but that's just my POV.  The statements are quite obviously another person's POV.  It seriously needs re-writing without POV.  I agree that the entire section is worthy of removal if it can't be re-written better; I've made an attempt to fix it up, but the vast majority of it is really POV and I'm not sure how to fix it without offending via weaselwords.  Feel free to modify more if you see fit.  ＾＾； 24.131.120.80 15:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated this some.  It still contains POV, and it still contains weasel words.  However, it no longer states opinions as facts, and I think that that's at least a step in the right direction, though there's still more to do.  It's a tough one to fix, because the idea of a Reception section seems to be highly geared towards stating opinions (as opinions of course).  What it really needs are verifiable sources of statistics that show these opinions - reputable marketing surveys, etc.  The best I can do personally is cite anecdotal evidence in this case.  But, again, at least it's no longer stating opinions as facts.  24.131.120.80 16:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it's pretty much a hopeless section, I removed it. Sometimes the best thing for wikipedia is removal, not addition -- febtalk  17:58, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reception
Talk:Erik Larsen

message: According to Erik Larsen, Highbrow never operated as a true studio in the way Wildstorm, Top Cow and the rest did.  Highbrow was nothing more than a glorified publishing imprint that only lasted a few years (from about 1995 to 1997), and it was just a label for Image books Erik Larsen was responsible for, so I think it makes more sense for Highbrow to just be covered in Larsen's page.  I should note that by comparison, Todd McFarlane Productions operates as full-blown studio, yet it doesn't have its own Wikipedia page.JFP (talk) 21:26, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highbrow Entertainment should be merged into this page 
Talk:AC Comics

message: When a comic is published sparadically, and is owned, written and drawn by the guy that owns the publishing company, can it really be properly labeled as "cancelled"?
*Well, it's the best I could think of, to be honest. I mean, you are right, we are operating in the grey area here. Maybe "suspended until further notice" would work better? I dunno. --Strannik 16:56, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Femforce

message: I have tried to engage  in a consensus-building discussion to end the edit-warring over redirecting this page at User_talk:Queenofcakes#Tara_Freemont Vexations (talk) 22:16, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  consensus building effort about redirecting this page
Talk:Rail transport in Belgium

message: In 1870 the Belgian state owned 863 km, while the private enterprises owned 2,231 km. From 1870 to 1882 the railways were gradually nationalised. In 1912, 786 km were state property compared to 275 km private linesand full nationalisation was considered,
<< these are some very strange numbers, someone has to look this up!
From over 3000 km to only 1000km within 12 years.
Correced it, in 1912 5,000 km of railway line was state owned  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.197.224.40 (talk) 21:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't a boemeltrein simply a local train (a 'slow train')? I don't think it's at all specific to Belgium. And the fact it has fewer carriages is normal, and not notable, surely?
In the given example, the stopping train is an 'IR' train on the timetables, rather than the faster 'IC'. (In other places the stopping trains are designated 'L' or 'CR'.) --David Edgar (talk) 15:16, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, a boemeltrein is in fact an L train or local train that should stop at every station along the way. IC trains connect te bigger cities, IR trains connect the major cities with smaller stops. P trains are rushhour trains, they only drive during rushhour while all the rest runs the entire day. CR stands for City Rail, CR is intended as a service around Brussels and will later be changed to GEN once all the works for the GEN are completed. 88.197.190.84 (talk) 11:47, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boemeltrein 

message: Request to redirect Belgian railways to Belgian Railways instead of to this page. There's a small disambiguation page now. Wakari07 (talk) 16:38, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this, I'll make the change. —fudoreaper (talk) 15:51, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to redirect
Talk:GMail Drive

message: Most of this article is fine, but it's obviously POV with the sentence "Gmail Drive is easy to use". I know it's a tiny thing but an encyclopaedia is not there to to give opinions on things, only to give facts. Could someone please change it to something a little less opinionated? -- Ukdragon37 21:18, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: easy enough.  I removed the sentence (you can do that, too).  I also altered the article to 3rd person.  — Lomn | Talk / RfC 21:24, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What's with the section labeled "Warning"? It doesn't seem particularly encyclopedic.--Frenchman113 19:38, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: This is incorrect, I think:
:Hence, a GMail Drive-user will be sharing his/her GMail account details with this third party.
Who is the third party?  The software is provided by a third party but the GMail a/c details are not communicated to any third party.  Paul Beardsell 21:39, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this for a fact. Your login information is in no way tranmitted to this "third party". The sentence was removed.--Eddie 20:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect warning 

message: There's a sentence "...but does not give an actual drive letter, such as C:, preventing its use in all DOS applications, and some older Windows applications" ; wouldn't using the DOS command subst nicely fix that "problem"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.28.110.81 (talk) 23:08, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SUBST? 

message: Yes, Google does not say 'GMail Drive' is banned, nor even 'file storage'. But it does say this:
5.3	You agree not to access (or attempt to access) any of the Services by any means other than through the interface that is provided by Google, unless you have been specifically allowed to do so in a separate agreement with Google. You specifically agree not to access (or attempt to access) any of the Services through any automated means (including use of scripts or web crawlers) and shall ensure that you comply with the instructions set out in any robots.txt file present on the Services.
GMail Drive DOES violate the Terms of Use, and the article should reflect this. --Jimmetry (talk) 13:45, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define 'explicitly' 
Talk:Dobra

message: The values of coins and bills are what I've found on several websites, but I'm confused about the range.  The smallest bill is 250 times the value of the largest coin?  It would seem that even the largest coin would be almost worthless, while the smallest bill would be rather inconveniently-sized for a minimum value.  Are the coins, in fact, honored for more than face value, say, 100 times?  Or are they in the midst of a 100:1 revaluing or what?  Does anyone here know? Nik42 22:34, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Krone

message: On 21:44, 25 March 2007, Juro deleted a big chunk of text, but left the edit summary blank.  I'm not sure why; it may even have been accidental.  That was followed by some plain old vandalism (by someone else), which did get reverted.  I've reverted to the version before the text delete, pending an explanation of what's going on.  If it was just a mistake, presumably this is the last we'll hear of it.  :)  —DragonHawk (talk) 04:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it's because the deleted currencies are repeated in the nav box below, and since they are not spelled "krone" exactly, there's no need to emphasize them? --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 09:54, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Juro explained that "they have been moved to Crown", so it's all good.  :)  —DragonHawk (talk) 11:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulk delete on 25 March 2007
Talk:Saint Joan (play)

message: I don't like to delete other people's posts from a discussion page. But what does the above mean?  JohnClarknew 21:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That 20 October 2005 post (archived on past versions if anyone really wants to see it) was vandalism; it's gone. DJRafe (talk) 07:36, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What does that mean?

message: I deleted this paragraph from the Criticism section, User:Beyond My Ken restored it, apparently finding the motivation in my edit summary to be unclear. So I'll elaborate. 
"More general interpretation of Joan's character is to describe her as a rebel against general institutional authority, such as that of the Catholic Church and to the feudal system.  Contemporary comments have noted her particularly strong form of religious belief and how it borders on religious fanaticism."
The problem here is the following. This passage is clearly trying to criticize Shaw for portraying Joan as a rebel against church authority, basing its criticism on the fact that Joan was known to be very religious. However:
1. There is no contradiction between being very religious and rebelling against church authority. (In case this is not self-evident - Martin Luther and numerous others have rebelled against their contemporary religious authorities, while considering themselves to be, if anything, more religious than the authorities they were rebelling against.) 
2. Even if there really were a contradiction, that would still be original research, because this criticism of Shaw is not attributed to anyone. The juxtaposition of Shaw's story and the historical accounts was obviously done by a wiki editor. --91.148.130.233 (talk) 18:59, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested paragraph
Talk:David P. Sartor

message: Some of this needs cutting. The "Honors" section repeats a good deal of stuff found earlier in the article. As it is, this article reads a little like a puff piece or vita reciting the composer's literal "dozens" of awards. Some of the biographical stuff is a bit much as well. Frankly, I'm not convinced that the average reader truly needs or wants to know all the details of Mr. Sartor's elementary school (!) and high school years. As for me, MEGO (My Eyes Glazed Over).
NicholasNotabene (talk) 08:49, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs cutting for redundancy 
Talk:Mirage Studios

message: Does Mirage hold the rights for the TMNT:TF character Aska?
Aska has only appeared in the videogame, so I'm assuming that Konami holds the rights. --Ninjakid 09:41, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal rights on Aska 

message: I own a few issues of this series, and I'm certain that it was never published under Mirage.  I'll have to dig up the issues to verify this. --Ninjakid 09:42, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gutwallow 

message: I seem to recall that they went out of business or bankrupt and that's why TMNT Volume 2 ended and Volume 3 was done by Image.  Any further info on what happened would be appreciated. Evan1975 02:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bankruptcy?

message: The purchase of the TMNT by Viacom took all rights and ownership away from Mirage, except for the ability to publish 18 comics per year. This would include the domain name ninjaturtles.com, which now has an ad on it about the upcoming show from Nickelodeon. Should the link to this site be removed from the Mirage Studios page? --Iwriteforme (talk) 22:48, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TMNT owned by Viacom now
Talk:Centavo

message: editors, attention. Please place this resource-http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/centavo#Portuguese- under the heading "resources." When you're done, just type "resource placing done" to let other editors  know you're done.
thank you --polpoluu~ 19:16, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Fils (currency)

message: Originally, fils is singular and fulus is the plural, but today, fils is also used as plural when we are speaking about the currency. For the Bahraini dinar, 1 BHD = 1000 fils (not fulus). Fulus (Arabic for money) is used to refer to money in general.MK (talk) 19:47, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Peter Laird

message: I got the changes I made to this article from an interview at www.projectfanboy.com with Peter Laird found here. I did not include this reference because of the controversy some editors seem to have with posting references to the site. If someone wishes to review the interview and include it as a reference it would be appreciated.143.79.143.10 (talk) 14:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't add material without adding the reference. I've never heard of this site, and I don't know of any controversy surrounding it. If the interview is legit, then I see nothing wrong with the site, aside from the fact that they're using my photograph of Laird without properly attributing it. Feel free to add the reference. Nightscream (talk) 14:56, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Will do. Thanks 143.79.143.10 (talk) 15:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  15:01, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: Does anyone think it it might be word mentioning Venus and his apparent hatred of the character and attempt to remove her from previously canon adventures from the website? Tyciol (talk) 13:19, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Venus
Talk:Anna-Louise Plowman

message: When did she become an American? --CocoaZen 21:38, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Citizenship

message: For IMDB she is born in 1975, here 1971. I do not know who is right. Macaldo (talk) 13:40, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The figure of 1971 came from an anon editor who said they went to school together. They also gave a figure of 1972 in a different edit. 1975 appears to be more reliable.-gadfium 21:03, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

text: At present the birth date of 1975, the graduation date of 1989 and the graduation age of 18 are mutually inconsistent. A birth date of 1971 (or 1970) would resolve this. The graduation date is correct and she would have been expected to graduate at 18. Neurotip (talk) 13:07, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth

message: I'm not an expert here, but I don't think using the picture of her as Osiris on Stargate is covered under fair use. I thought we were only supposed to use screen caps on pages that were in relation to the show they were taken from, as opposed to on the actor's pages.
Should it be taken down?
75.199.232.82 (talk) 00:02, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ”Fair use” doesn’t require the source not be from a show. It doesn’t matter either way: if the source is copyrighted, it’s copyrighted. Doesn’t matter if that’s by an individual photographer or MGM. Fair use is fair use.2601:1C2:5000:1472:A862:493D:ADA0:7987 (talk) 10:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Current Image 

message: It’s the 12th of May, 2022 as I write this, and the age (which is supposed to be automatically calculated) still says 49.
I mean, she may not LOOK like she ages, but...2601:1C2:5000:1472:A862:493D:ADA0:7987 (talk) 10:07, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the date broken?
Talk:Barquentine

message: Added another earlier example of the class
Fenton Robb 21:39, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Transylvanian Mountains

message: I think that I've fixed most of the errors in the article. However, I was unable to find the correct spelling of one of the passes. It is misspelled in both online versions of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica. "In the Transylvanian Mountains the principal passes are: the Rodna, the Borgo, the Tolgyes and the B()kas." -- Kjkolb 21:39, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't waste too much time on this article. It's very outdated, and uses all kinds of Latin, German and Hungarian names for places in present Romania. The term "Transylvanian Mountains" is not very useful either, since the "outer" half of the mountains is in Moldavia and Wallachia. See Divisions of the Carpathians for the modern division. BTW your B()kas is Bicaz (Bekás in Hungarian). Markussep 12:26, 24 October 2005 (UTC)

text: No it's not, it just dates from 1911, when Transylvania was part of Hungary. The useful parts of the article should probably be merged with Carpathian Mountains, maybe some of the details can be used in articles about the various sections of the Carpathians. Markussep Talk 07:26, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors
Talk:Right Hand of Doom

message: Right Hand of Doom into Hellboy, as proposed by Jessemonroy650
===Survey===
Merge it.  Even though these are unusual circumstances, the concept of having a separate article for a character's right arm is utterly ridiculous. -Toptomcat 23:34, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Merge it.  Even though these are unusual circumstances, the concept of having a separate article for a character's right arm is utterly ridiculous. -Toptomcat 23:34, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Emily

message: Was the name Emily a stereotype in the late 60s/70s? 
There are 3 songs i know which are about some Emily:
The bear - Not A Rose For Emily, 
Pink Floyd - See Emily Play, 
Simon & Garfunkel - For Emily, Whenever I May Find Her
The Designers - Emily Shalant is a tasty treat  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.167.131.26 (talk) 19:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stereotype? 

message: It says "Emily: also meaning industrious." It is also written: "Amelia" is an unrelated germanic name meaning "work" This needs some clarification, that is, if anybody ever visits this page. --Monkeyfoetus 09:18, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning 

message: it might be better to put 'Female Political Activists'
at the moment it says 'Suffragists' with a Suffragette listed underneath it.
they are two very different things and movements,
so i thought i'd just mention it.
82.43.141.45 17:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I should have noticed that when I cleaned the page yesterday. Pontificake 17:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suffragists 

message: Just to clarify, I thought it should be transwikied because there is content about the name Emily in this article that is not already in the Wiktionary article.  My intention was to remove the alternate spellings, translations, etymology, and popularity sections after the transwiki.  Pan Dan 22:31, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|Copy to Wiktionary}} 

message: I haven't yet taken the action suggested by my dialogue above with Uncle G, because what I'd really like to do is convert this page to a proper Wikipedia:Disambiguation page, which it purports to be but is not.  We should remove, for example, the list of people whose first name is Emily.  Any objections?  Pan Dan 16:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation