Talk:Hanoi Hannah

message: Were all of her broadcasts recorded, or were they live? Where was she active in Vietnam? Captain Jackson 07:16, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know for sure that some of her broadcasts were live, but I'm not sure if some of them were recorded or all were live. I think it is very unlikely that all of her broadcasts were live. During the war, she lived and worked in Hanoi. Now she retired, I just know that she live in either Hanoi or Ho Chi Minh City. I think the latter, but I'm not sure.
And in the end she was right... ironic
"The broadcasts were widely derided by the troops," 
this has to be sourced
"and there is no evidence that the propaganda had any effect."
That sentence is irelevant since the effectiveness of information or persuation cannot be measured.84.167.195.157 (talk) 12:56, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recorded or Live

message: How could she have lived in Ho Chi Minh City during the war.
Saigon is Ho Chi. Maybe after 1975 she lived in Ho Chi but I doubt she was brodcasting live communist propaganda with Allied forces stationed right outside the door. It makes no sense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TJ13090 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: The top of the article lists October 2nd as her date of death, and the bottom lists September 30th?  I'm not in a position at the moment to research the correct date, just bringing it to light.  Lonadar (talk) 11:58, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Actual date of death?

message: Per WP:COMMONNAME the vast majority of English language sources refer to Hanoi Hannah - this is currently reflected both by the sources used in the article, and those found elsewhere. 'BLP violation' is a ridiculous argument for two reasons 1. She is dead, so the risk of offense is minimal even given her recent death. 2. No evidence the name was derogatory. If a move is requested, WP:RM is the place to do so. Only in death does duty end (talk) 09:43, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: has deleted and moved pages related to this subject. Kindly revert the deletions and moves and set up a discussion of the proposed deletion/move with reasons and allow discussion before such significant action is taken. This action needs to be discussed as there are other perspectives to consider. MurielMary (talk) 10:06, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No deletion has taken place, page already existed at Hanoi Hannah. Once a page move has been contested (usually by reversion of the move) either a discussion on the article talkpage or at WP:RM is required in order to gain consensus to move it. Feel free to do either of the above. Only in death does duty end (talk) 10:13, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article deletion must be discussed before action taken 

message: Would an uninvolved administrator please consider the discussion above under the heading "Recent moves"—including as reference the discussion at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates (latest version seen here) to that Drmies referred to as the determining consensus in originally moving the article—and either move the article back based on a determination on consensus here or rule on the necessity for a Requested Moves discussion on moving it back? Yngvadottir (talk) 15:55, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Since not everyone is agreeing, and a simple discussion on just this page is not going to get lot of attention, then why not use Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Requesting_a_single_page_move. The more public listing is likely to attract more editors to the discussion. You have all been talking about it for a month, one more week won't hurt. Then you get a nice final result. Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:14, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question for administrator