lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Armless flounder

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 09:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Crested flounder

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 07:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Witch (lefteye flounder)

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Flatfish

message: The researchers concluded that "the change happened gradually, in a way consistent with evolution via natural selection—not suddenly, as researchers once had little choice but to believe." Reference
Here's what it says in the article it's from:
CT scans of 50-million-year-old fossils have revealed an intermediate species between primitive flatfishes (with eyes on both sides of their heads) and the modern, lopsided versions, which include sole, flounder, and halibut. 
So the change happened gradually, in a way consistent with evolution via natural selection—not suddenly, as researchers once had little choice but to believe, the authors of the new study say. 
The longstanding gap in the flatfish fossil record has long been explained by a "hopeful monster"—scientific jargon for an unknown animal blessed with a severe but helpful mutation that was passed down to its descendants. 
It does not use direct quotation marks, so is it actually a direct quote? Who exactly said it? Can we find the original published study and then see what they say in that? --Harizotoh9 (talk) 00:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amphistium quote: 
Talk:Banded-fin flounder

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 20:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Black flounder

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 02:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Verbs (rapper)

message: A link plus Mathmo Talk 10:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: god is good  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.96.113 (talk) 19:26, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  i love the lord 
Talk:Greenback flounder

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:New Zealand sand flounder

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 23:50, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:New Zealand sole

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 00:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:New Zealand turbot

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 00:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Crazy Joe

message: I removed the part about him falling to his death, as I'm not sure if this really was the case. --MrEquator 10:14, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death? 

message: I have been reverting the redirection of this page to the one for Crazy Joe Davola.  All of the pages that link to "Crazy Joe" are not related to the seinfeld character.  Check out the "What links here" before creating a redirect to the davola page, please. --Duke33 (talk) 21:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't blank the page, if there are multiple meanings of the term, create a disambiguation page. --Closedmouth (talk) 02:05, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection
Talk:Southern lemon sole

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 19:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Tonguefish

message: The BBC recently ran an article on a very interesting species of tonguefish. Beowulph 00:14, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: One that lives near molton sulphur

message: The article doesn't explain why these fish are called tonguefish (what is remarkable about its tongue?), and the article should. —Lowellian (reply) 05:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why called tonguefish?
Talk:Palmares (quilombo)

message: Don't merge. These topics are distinct enough to be separate. —Sesel 16:15, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: First of all, if anyone reads this before editing, change this bit, as it needs a space:
Palmares was home to not only escaped slaves, but also to mulattos, caboclos, Indians and poor whites,especially portugese soldiers trying to excape forced military service.
Secondly, the above statement is contradicted further on in the text, in the 2nd paragraph of Palmares to Angola Janga:
An independent, self-sustaining republic, Palmares was vast and at its height hosted a population of over 30,000 free African men, women and children.
from my knowledge, the first statement is the correct one, so the second one needs to get changed, maybe to "over 30,000 free, mainly African, men, women and children"? - ChrisWar666 17:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling / conflicts 

message: I'm not sure if "miscegnation" is the best term to describe inter-racial marriages - for me it has racist overtones. Solri (talk) 17:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Miscegnation"

message: The section about whether the term "quilombo" is correct doesn't seem to be very worthwhile.  The only objection seems to be that it wasn't used in contemporary documents.  But really so what?--Jack Upland (talk) 02:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quilombo 
Talk:Turbot

message: Family Scophthalmidae is linked to Genus Psetta maxima. This is not correct since family is not genus. The linking must be corrected.
ICE77 -- 84.223.77.125 22:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong/bad linking 

message: The copyrighted web page at http://www.pacseafood.com/products/flounder.html has much useful information about nomenclature and its misuse in the marketplace.  It might be good to add it as an external reference. peter (talk) 00:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Link 

message: Now it is related to Scophthalmus, see: Bailly N., Chanet B. (2010) Scophthalmus Rafinesque, 1810: The valid generic name for the turbot, S. maximus (Linnaeus, 1758) [Pleuronectiformes: Scophthalmidae]. Cybium, 34(3): 257-261.
Also FishBase --Ykvach (talk) 12:31, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Current taxonomic status
Talk:Yellowbelly flounder

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:43, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Bichir

message: Whilst I enjoy speculative evolution as much as the next man, I'm curious as to the specific source(s) from which the information concerning the evolution of polypterids over the next 600 million years was derived. I find it remarkably hard to believe evolution to be so predictable that, even with modern science, anyone could say with absolute confidence how any organism will evolve over the next million, let alone 600 million years. Whilst I can't say the section is necessarily incorrect, or even really doubt its plausibility with relative confidence, Carl Sagan's aphorism "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." comes to mind.Aquakeeper14 (talk) 00:52, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: The Section Entitled "Future"
Talk:Polypterus senegalus

message: I am curious if the "behavior" information is from a personal account or if there is a resource to cite?JCWBryan (talk) 01:36, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: someone did a new study involving these things
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nature13708.html
should we include this?KendoSnowman (talk) 12:29, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Study
Talk:I Need Mine

message: On the Houston radio station 97.9 The Box, on December 16, Lil Flip was in the studio and stated that the album will be realesed sometime in March —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.116.75.190 (talk) 00:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  due date 

message: Moved from the article: "A rumor is that he might release his album on his birthday." JPX7 03:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rumors on the Internets

message: The cover here is for the DVD.  The other cover isn't posted. Killfire72 18:43, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Cover
Talk:Charles Horton Cooley

message: Cooley is one of the most influential sociologists!  I can hardly believe there isn't more information about him.  I'll work on updating this, but any help from someone who knows more about sociology would be greatly appreciated.  --Zagsa 21:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: About "No free image": isn't any picture of Cooley in the public domain by now since he died more than 70 years ago?
Algotr 11:36, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Isn't all pictures of Cooley in the public domain by now?

message: "Ben Mann was born in Ann Arbor, Michigan in November 11th, 1986."
- Is Ben Mann Cooley's initial name ?
- Which is real birth year ?
--Ft93110 (talk) 11:06, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First sentence & birth date

message: Can we please have more consensus about recent edits? It's getting a bit silly. Yes, the new material is a bit 'raw' and needs proper referencing, but that should not be sufficient reason to delete it all every other day, surely? The editor clearly needs some help in that area. Why not post all the new stuff here for folks to mull over and suggest refs for and say how to reference new stuff properly? Some of the new material is very interesting. It's not fair to just keep deleting it all. I am asure that is also very discouraging for a new editor who might get scared away by such behaviour. Can we please have a more peaceful and collaborative path to take? thank you Peter morrell 12:36, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  edit war over recent edits 

message: "Obstetative elimination" in the absence of a 19th century medical dictionary may be presumed to be the same as obstipation or severe constipation.  In other words, he was an "anal" character or an obsessive neurotic.  His philosophy may be compared with that of other budding sociologists, such as Baldwin and Ross, in "quest of community" and opposed to the Spencerian individualism, if not Social Darwinism of the latter 19th century, as well as, other social and political movements, such as Progressivism, Legal Realism, pragmatism, etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.241.26.8 (talk) 04:27, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "obstetative elimination" 

message: Charles Cooley ki samajik ekta 103.160.135.83 (talk) 01:54, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samaj me javik ekta  

message: Cooley was hugely influential on Philip Rieff, to the point where Rieff should probably be listed under those influenced by him. I’d do it myself but I don’t quite get how all this stuff works. 2601:152:A01:9480:CD14:3070:38AE:24C (talk) 19:58, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philip Rieff
Talk:Massena, New York

message: Could we have a map! A thousand words or a simple picture, Duh.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.246.208 (talk) 21:38, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Map added. --JBC3 (talk) 13:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map? 