lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Oliver Law

message: In serious looking statements in the Comments section of the online edition (September 2, 2009)  of The Jewish Daily Foreward (September 11, 2009) the old story about Law's incompetence and subsquent murder by his own people is repeated.  statement by Alan, Sept. 7, 2009. Either way, the Grover Furr statements in the Comments are really stupid or worse.--Radh (talk) 10:37, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Serious Questions about Law's Death

message: Texas is a large place; 678,051 Km². In fact, Texas is 135% the size of Spain (504,030 Km²). There are tens of thousands of named communities in Texas. For an “encyclopedia” to state in passing that Oliver Law was from Texas suggests that this very un-encyclopedic entry leaves a considerable amount to be desired. Can’t the contributor do better than narrowing Law’s birthplace down to 678,051 Km² ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.79.62.19 (talk) 06:44, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace? 

message: How does one join the Army in 1919 and serve in WWI?
I removed WWI -- A1000 (talk) 19:12, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWI service
Talk:Tui na

message: Greetings. I'm glad that there is finally an article for this term! I am trained in tui na, and I've never had to have a course in Western physical therapy or kinesiology. I've worked with many Western therapists over the years, and what they teach is different enough from the tui na that I was taught to make their theories useless to my application of acupressure and acupoint manipulative therapy. My and my colleagues' interactions with that community have almost always involved our educating them as to what we do and why, not the other way around. That is why I edited the article the way I did. Fire Star 14:57, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Tui na should refer specifically to Chinese acupressure as a branch of traditional Chinese medicine. Other countries have their own, shiatsu, for example, which is also acupressure but not tui na. --Fire Star 火星 12:09, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am mostly concerned with the introduction, which currently assumes that it tui na is an effective treatment (e.g. "to bring the body to balance", not "to attempt to bring..." or "which practitioners claim can bring...") and the objective existence of some mystical concepts like "balance" and chi. I am not personally familiar enough with the topic to feel comfortable making the necessary edits, but I wanted to flag the issues for some more topically-authoritative writer to handle. 71.233.11.177 (talk) 13:06, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Language 

message: Only one example and it looks like an advertisement.
No given references here.173.176.120.156 (talk) 14:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it. If anybody has any better sources, that could be helpful... bobrayner (talk) 22:30, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples of medications 

message: What is the history of tuina?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.81.161.226 (talk) 15:04, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Daniel Cohn-Bendit

message: Hey, having a conversation with Schlacke, re: the May 68' uprising. CB was in fact pushed into the position by GL. I would like to hear from who was there at that time. Thanks for your time
Eithne Brennan
etnarage03@yahoo.co.uk 86.20.68.10 (talk) 22:04, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danny Cohen Bendit with Gustave (Gunthard)Lamche 

message: I'm not even going to remove it. Like the vandalism's kinda funny. ᗞᗴᖇᑭᗅᒪᗴᖇᎢ (talk) 04:14, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whoever added "pedophile" as one of his occupations 

message: This article was in exceptionally poor shape: unsourced and about a living person. I've removed the unsourced content, but you should feel free to restore it as long as you can provide a reliable, secondary source. The only sourced content was about controversies political and sexual, creating an issue of due/disproportionate weight. The political controversies re: Václav Klaus and Viktor Orbán read as trivia. They are not even mentioned in the German article, which covers many other Cohn-Bendit controveries. Similarly its coverage of his comments about child–adult sexuality is also more even. For the sake of due weight, I am removing the copious detail from this section. Again, feel free, when the rest of the biography is built out to balance the controversies, to re-expand the sourced section. czar 16:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  TNT
Talk:Subtitle (disambiguation)

message: Shouldn't this article be split into two seperate articles?
I think it would be best to split into subtitle and subtitles (with disambiguating hatnotes at the top of both) as one is almost exclusively used in the singular and one in the plural.
The alternative is splitting it into subtitle (film) (or subtitle (movie) or something) and subtitle (work)/subtitle (book)/subtitle (title).  This I find this less satisfactory as both sorts of subtitles can apply to films and TV series.
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 14:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as the article starts as it does, i.e. by briefly explaining the two different meanings, I don't think there is a need to split it, even if the article grows. The film and TV meaning of the expression may grow a lot, but I don't think there is much more to add to the "title/subtitle" part (unless people start adding hundrededs of meaningless examples in the all too common Wikipedia list mania).Thomas Blomberg 15:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Nobody seems to have very strong feelings bout the suggested split, so I'll remove the tag, as it's been there for a month and a half. Thomas Blomberg 20:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As this dialog seems to be hanging for a lot of time (half a year?), and I'm strongly supporting splitting and DBA page, I've done it. Please look for the results and tell your opinions. --GreyCat 19:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article split
Talk:Sociocybernetics

message: For a September 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Sociocybernetics
----
* As an actual article, although unencyclopedic original "research", I think this is more of a VFD candidate than a speed delete. -- Infrogmation 15:51, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vote for deletion sept 2004 

message: For sometime now, there has been a "neutrality" tag on the article, with the notation "The neutrality of this article is disputed. Please see discussion on talk page." Looking at this page, I could see no discussion, just the above notation by NCriss that a section (that no longer exists) needs reworking. I've removed the neutrality tag (and the one that said that the article was a "personal essay." I've left the clean-up tag, but for goodness sakes let's not just see how many tags we can add to an article, let's fix it! Sunray (talk) 15:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: "Other challenges faced by sociocyberneticians are those that stem from Bookchin's work "The Ecology of Freedom and the emergence and decline of Hierarchy".
Bookchin's argument is that what has often been described as "primitive" societies are best thought of as "organic" societies. People within them have differentiated roles as do the cells of a body, but this differentiation is largely reversible. Coordination between the cells is not organized by some "center" but through a network of feedback (cybernetic) processes. Particularly important are organisms' ability to evolve as well as reproduce. But simply saying that the process is "autopoietic" is to evade the task of identifying the multiple and mutually reinforcing cybernetic processes that are at work.
Yet Bookchin's claim is that the evolution of organic societies into our current, vastly destructive, hierarchical societies - over millennia - has also taken place through some ... (almost cancerous?) ... unstoppable autopoietic process. If we are to halt this process ... which is about to destroy us as a species, probably carrying the planet as we know it with us, it will be necessary to map and find ways of intervening in the sociocybernetic processes involved. No centralised system-wide, command-and-control oriented, change will suffice. Systems intervention requires complex systems-oriented intervention targeted at nodes in the system, not system-wide change based on "common sense"
I have not read the book, and I am not seeing documentation: neither in regards to the argument's existence, nor any supporting its claims.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.15.99.233 (talk) 21:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I deleted this:
Talk:Shirley Temple Bar

message: From VfD:
I'm sure she's a wonderful entertainer, but is the winner of a drag beauty pageant sufficiently notable? Geogre 16:00, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have redirect to Declan Buckley, as this is more common at present. It was just a mirror page under a different title. Murry1975 (talk) 16:33, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected
Talk:The Higher They Climb

message: Wikipedia has some kind of pathetic nerve begging for money from people, especially after the ROTTEN way many people are treated by the moderators while trying to correct information on their OWN Wikipedia pages! They get accused of lying about THEMSELVES. Not to mention, the way you come across in the process of begging for money is just plain rude in and of itself. If you don't want to volunteer to be a jerk moderator, we certainly aren't going to pay you to be a jerk moderator. We will continue to read on for FREE and Wikipedia will continue on with VOLUNTEERS. Maybe if you were nicer people, you wouldn't have to beg for money from us to begin with. Just a thought. Now get over yourselves already because you just come off sounding like control freaks with no sort of real or at all happy lives.....carry on. 173.16.4.15 (talk) 14:07, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop Begging For Money
Talk:Naftali Zvi Yehuda Berlin

message: Thank you, RK, for noticing that there is an article on the Netziv. I protest your added reference, which I duly removed. A reference is something that is referred to in the article body, not just slapped under an article to show that someone has written something about this great man. The title of the article you quote also sounds rather alarmist and/or partisan. JFW | T@lk 16:27, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :He was born into a family of Jewish scholars renowned for its scholarship. His father Jacob, while not being a rabbi, was a Talmudic scholar, and his mother was directly descended from Although initially a weak student, legend has it that he applied himself to his studies after overhearing his parents debating whether he should pursue a trade.
The sentence fragment highlighted is unfinished. His mother was directly descended from whom?? It just merges into the next sentence. Any help? The JE article has nothing helpful. --FeanorStar7 10:53, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was inadvertedly deleted. I've restored it with material from old revisions. JFW | T@lk 19:39, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem

message: I've added in the notion that the secular studies may have been more due to "Rusification" than Haskalah per se (or some combination of the two); this would also explain why the Volozhin yeshiva was singled out for this requirement.  This can be heard on Rabbi Rakefet's lectures.  (I assume that these lectures were the source for whomever added the "internal turmoil" reasoning?  Yeyasher kochacha!)
Should we reference Rabbi JJ Schechter's article on the contraversy regarding the closing of the Yeshiva?  Or is that going too partisan?
:JJ Schechter is indeed quite partisan, but if he provides the sources for whatever you wanted to insert in the article then I see no reason why it should be kept out. I suppose Rabbi Rafeket bases himself on primary sources - could you identify these? JFW | T@lk 23:39, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Russification

message: Any Information on why he left the chovivei tzion? Influence on his son Rav Berlin,(later Bar Ilan). The article in many areas lacks sources Endabusenow 18:35, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: chovivei tzion
Talk:-stan

message: The article is a very long list already. 
*Some tables had duplications and omissions. 
*They are difficult to maintain. 
*They create trouble for viewing on mobile devices, very popular now.
*They contain redundant geographical information, unnecessary in linguistic articles.
*Flagicons are not recommended in places like this. I 
Even after I collapse the tables, the list is still very long, but we cannot do anything about that.
I agree that the names of countries in foreign languages may be of interest and give an insight on the proliferation of the suffix.Lembit Staan (talk) 18:28, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables in the article
Talk:Athletics at the 2004 Summer Olympics – Men's marathon

message: Was this marathon the current set distance (26.2 mi) as perscribed by the IOC or was it reverted so that the athletes could run the original course from Marathon to Athens? → JARED (t)  22:17, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance? 

message: Just do it!  No need to get comments for something this simple.  Andrwsc 02:13, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but please don't do copy-paste moves, and please do get the new name correct.  "Men's marathon" rather than "Men's Marathon". -- Jonel | Speak 02:01, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that, I should have known better...   Andrwsc 00:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Ernie Eves

message: The August 28 changes made by an anonymous editor were strongly partisan, e.g., "McGuinty ran a magnificent campaign".  Wikipeida is not a forum for partisan political comments - the editor will soon learn that partisan commentary doesn't last long on Wikipedia. Kevintoronto 19:02, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems that Ernie hosts occasional discussions on Toronto AM640 radio. The link attached says he will be hosting june 25 to 28, 2013 but I have seen this before a few months ago and it appears to be a regular occasional host now. Quote from the article linked: "“Ernie Eves is no stranger to Talk Radio AM640,” said Gord Harris, Program Director, Talk Radio AM640. “For the past few years, the former Ontario Premier has been a regular contributor to The Econoclash Panel on The John Oakley Show and we are excited to have him join us in the hot seat as host for four programs providing audiences with informed and engaging talk radio.”" - http://www.640toronto.com/HostsandShows/ErnieEves/Main.aspx
Perhaps for a section on "after politics" or "personal life"
hopefully when the time comes this can be added to the article 
24.36.155.70 (talk) 21:02, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oakdale, Louisiana

message: I originally uploaded the map for Oberlin instead of Oakdale, labeled as Oakdale. I've noticed a lag between the time I upload an image update, and when I'm able to see the updated version, rather than the original. I don't know if this is true for others, but I'll be watching this to see if the correct version displays soon. Catbar (Brian Rock) 19:28, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Johann Kaspar Zeuss

message: I think this article should be titled Johann Kaspar Zeuss rather than Johann Kaspar Zeuß.  The citation for the Catholic encyclopedia uses Zeuss, as does most English citations.  His own works are published under the name Zeuss.  The bibliographic citation by the German National Library in our article uses Zeuss, for pete's sake.  Erudy (talk) 17:25, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Title
Talk:Tooth decay

message: It is effective in reducing mutans streptococci.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4232036/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.186.130.106 (talk) 12:24, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a single mention of Xylitol? 

message: In its current form, this section is mostly unsupported by references – and also is confusing: on the one hand it talks about caries being a singular noun (which it is!) taking singular verb inflections (e.g., caries is caused, not caries are caused), but on the other hand it talks about it being a plurale tantum word (which I don't believe it is). Are there any good references (ideally open and not hidden behind a paywall) that would resolve this and could be easily referenced in the section? cherkash (talk) 11:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing "Etymology and usage" section 

message: I think asthma should be added to the risk factors, as having asthma decreases saliva production and therefore contributes to tooth decay. Anonymous Gnostic (talk) 21:52, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Risk Factors 

message: such an essential topic shout get more attention. there are many contradictions in the article. also the order is quite horrendous. please please if you know anything about this subject try to contribute to make something half normalBentzion T. (talk) 07:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written
Talk:Criticism of Prem Rawat/Archive 1

message: I have made several edits. Mostly presenting the POV of the supporters. I have not removed anything you have added, unless it was completely erroneous. For example the allegations of secual misconduct. I used the text on the main article that is factually accurate. In the future, if you want to edit or add to this page, it will be good if you can avoid presenting your POV )or the POV of the ex-followers) as a fact. --jossi 22:55, 19 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andries, before you complain, read. 

message: Eventually the Criticism of Prem Rawat article should be merged into Prem Rawat. I have the language skills to do this myself, but not the time. 
We all need to agree on a plan for what a merged article would look like. What I myself would like to see is some early biography about the man, an outline of his rise to prominence, a section about his teachings (summary or detailed doesn't matter to me), a section about disgreements with his teachings, and a section on general reactions to his career/movement. The 'reactions' section could have gushing testimonies about how wonderful his devotees' lives have become, as well as bitter denunciations by ex-followers about how much time they wasted, how they were duped, etc. And if anyone has the stomach for it, a list of charges (like he seduced my daughter in an Indian ashram in 1987) and official rebuttals (like no way, man I was in Canada the whole year!). --Uncle Ed 18:07, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That could work. Now, who is going to do this? maybe Zappaz has time? --4.60.12.136 18:34, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree we need a plan. My concern with your proposal to merge is that the main article is already too big. This, by the look of it, is a pretty small NRM with a very polarized situation. Giving it more weight than Scientology, for example, is just not right. The Scientology article is much smaller (and probably because of that it managed to stabilize itself). So far we have had pressure from a small group of ex-followers to expand on their POV, mainly those responsible for the ex-premie website. Wait until a group of followers join the discussion to push their POV (so far I have only seen one of them active in the discussions) and we will end up in an escalating and never ending situation. My counter proposal is as follows. Reduce the fluff on the current article and reduce the criticism as well to at least 25% of current size.  Both pro and con have their own websites, so what is the point of repeating the points made on these? A couple of references to these sites will suffice. Proposed structure: 1. Short Intro; 2. History of movement (1971 to present day); 3. Practices and Beliefs; 4. Controversy and Critics; 5. Testimonials ( a few testimonials from current followers, and a few from ex-followers, Short one paragraph each); 6. External links; 7. References. I'm willing to give it a try, but I don't want to waste my time unless there is concensus on this proposed treatment. Comments? (copying this to main article discussion as well)--Zappaz 21:15, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Lions Gate Bridge

message: Do we need this section? It doesn't seem to add any worthwhile information (just uncited trivia). Why not just call it a landmark in the opening sentence and cut this section? Moisejp (talk) 11:09, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landmark 

message: An IP editor,  provided the following feedback:
:This bridge was not expanded to 3 lanes by repainting the lines. The deck was replaced and in doing so the sidewalks were moved to the outside of the suspension cables. On the non-suspended portion, a wider deck was installed to mate to the suspended portion.
Due to an issue with the feedback, it must be hidden, to avoid loosing the potentially useful feedback when it is hidden I am copying the above non problematic portion of the feedback here. I can't vouch for the accuracy, but it certainly deserves consideration. Monty845 21:30, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bridge Widening 
Talk:Belvedere House and Gardens

message: This has the Where. But, Who When Why. What style? Why famous? Who built it? Who was it built for? Why is the Jelous Wall spelt that way? Wetman 21:21, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/User:Guanaco versus User:Lir

message: Shouldn't the remedy #3 be removed? #1 covers it and was more strongly supported than #3. Guanaco 21:37, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Guanaco, I'd suggest (and it's only my perspective) that both remain, since if it is established (as some suggested) that the community would reject the AC's decision to demand reference on the grounds that "the AC can't make policy and that's making policy", the 1st remedy would be rendered null and void.  So in that case Remedy #3 would stand.  I have no idea if that was intended, but it makes sense to me. Jwrosenzweig 22:49, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Siemens SX1

message: Actually, you can remove the card whilst the phone is on. This is done by entering the phone's card management menu, and selecting "Swap memory card". This then turns off all open programs, allowing you to safely eject the card while the phone is still on. This is in contrast to most other phones incorporating MMCs, where you actually have to turn the phone off before you can remove the MMC. What's more, the data loss message is merely a disclaimer. So long as you close all open programs which use the MMC before you eject it (check by holding down the menu key for a few seconds), you can safely eject the card every time without using the phone's card control menu, ignore the warning message, and never have any problems. Impi 21:59, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)