lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Glans penis

message: Hi. I have recently learned that the ventral surface is the front of the body, and dorsal surface is the back of the body.
So, why is the dorsal surface of the penis the surface of the penis that is in front of the body?
And why is the ventral surface of the penis the surface of the penis that is facing at the back of the body? Jas9777 (talk) 16:08, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That's actually funny. It depends on whether the penis is erect or not, right? But I suppose the scientific terminology already has some accommodation for these possible variations. I assume it considers organs to be in repose. The same issue could be said about the arm, you can raise it in a way that the front is turned backwards. Somebody who is familiar with how the medical profession defines these terms in Anatomy should be able to clarify.
--85.240.181.243 (talk) 10:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dorsal and Ventral Surface 

message: Prcc27, Piccco has a point about this. The exceptions are covered by the word "typically". The words "except in those who have been circumcised" can be removed. That's what I did when I added back the information. The foreskin should have a proper mention in the lead, and then a little detail lower in the page. GBFEE (talk) 20:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, “except in those who have been circumcised” is problematic and a WP:OR problem. The word “typically” did not help fix the issue I had with that part still included in the sentence. As long as it fits in the body, and is not UNDUE, your alternative for the lead would work. Prcc27 (talk) 21:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with GBFEE on the foreskin having a mention in the lead. Prcc27, It was not my intention to vandalize the page and I tried to make clear the reason behind my edit. For example, some people are bald, that would not make the sentence "typically hair grows on the head" incorrect. I hope you understand what I want to say. In any case, I'll respect your desire not to iclude the sentence as it was. Maybe the sentence "Typically, the glans is completely or partially covered by the foreskin in humans, with some exceptions, including circumcision" would be more appropriate? Or just the first part without including the exceptions at all? You can make your own suggestions that you think would fit better on the lead. Piccco (talk) 14:00, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

text: *Your alternative wording would work as well. Prcc27 (talk) 17:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The foreskin and exceptions
Talk:NWA

message: The reason why I censored the rap group's name on this page is that the term "NWA", among other things, also disambiguates into "Northwest Arkansas", perhaps the most politically conservative region of that state; the expletive in the rap group's name would offend many people in that region (even though there are few African-Americans there).  The best way to prevent "drive-by" (no pun intended) exposure to the expletive is to censor the name here, but refer interested persons to the main article (where their name is, and must remain, uncensored).  --RBBrittain 06:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Dance 360

message: This show is on TV, check out UPN. It's syndicated.
----
I deleted the following odd edit.  If this was incorrect, I apologize.  John Barleycorn 07:08, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
:The show is whacky at times with the father of Jake Lampenfeld on the show, better known as White Chocolate.
I know what he's talking about I think.  White Chocolate was this older dude with "crazy fly" dance movements.  Because he was older than thirty he stood out and was a bit of a crowd favourite.  But uh... probably not important to the entry on D360.  I could also be talking out of my ass, this is from memory and I haven't seen the show in two years.
Does anyone know if I can get this show on DVD or VHS? I would be willing to pay 200 dollars.
Greatest. Show. Ever. 24.86.164.96 (talk) 05:54, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Talk:9K34 Strela-3

message: I can find plenty of references discussing 9M36 and 9M36-1 missiles for the 9K36:
* fas.org
* aiaa.org
* ci.uw.edu.pl
* assegaitrading.co.za
* designation-systems.net
* Jane's Defence Weekly
What I can't find is any clear indication of any differences there might be between the two. Does anyone have some information on what the different designations might mean? One of the references suggests that 9M36-1 is the export version of the 9M36.
Nvinen 01:06, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Strela-3 is redirecting here which seems to be a model of military communications satellite. Secretlondon (talk) 04:28, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comsat
Talk:Royal International Air Tattoo

message: This article reads a little too much like a commercial flyer or advertisement.
194.47.144.18 01:35, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: Please dont move - I have added more about the history and other information to the article, it it encylopedic as the largest air display in the world. But I think we can get rid of some (or most) of the pictures (particular the same subject duplicates) MilborneOne 20:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now I have tided up the text then I think the pictures should be moved to commons MilborneOne 14:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I have removed the images, the page has more than enough links to image pages for anybody interested. MilborneOne 22:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I have also removed the expand flag as this article has been expanded and corrected since it was flagged last year. MilborneOne 22:14, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: Just justifying a recent revision - Noticed someone's addition regarding this weekend's cancellation had been reverted by a bot because a banned link had also been added alongside some quite reasonable text (youtube). I've undone the bot edit, reinstating that user's addition, but minus the offending link. Hope this doesnt cause any problems. VWOzone (Talk) 20:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot edit

message: The Air Tattoo was actually based at RAF Alconbury for a number of years in the 80’s and into the 90’s. 2A00:23C7:C600:A001:E80A:A478:82A7:5800 (talk) 13:12, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RAF Alconbury Air Tattoo
Talk:Maxwell relations

message: Failed to parse(unknown function '\begin')  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:7:F00:CF0:9942:D5E4:777:C5F9 (talk) 18:41, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article doesn't define what G, F, U, and H are in the mnemonic device.  --Doradus 15:13, August 5, 2005 (UTC)
This is not a mnemonic device for the Maxwell relations. Its a mnemonic device for something
else, perhaps in the Thermodynamic potentials article. Please read the article before 
inserting this. Be sure it coincides with what is written in the article. PAR 02:33, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are G, F, U, and H? 

message: I love the mnemonic device.  Notice that the top derivative (dP/dV at const S) is the sound speed.  I believe sound speed should be incorporated into the bigger picture, making it just as important as thermal expansion, compressibility, and the heat capacities.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.221.224.7 (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound Speed
Talk:Brazilian porcupine

message: What animal is this referring to?  Coendu prehensilis?  Something else?  Would someone mind adding the scientific name so that others can edit the article?  Also, isn't Brazilian spelled with one L? --Aranae 01:46, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)
:If this really is Coendu prehensilis, it should probably be moved to "Prehensile-tailed Porcupine", a more recognzable common name.  I'm still not convinced C. prehensilis was the author's intent.  Mostly I'm unsure what that intent was. --Aranae 08:08, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What species?
Talk:Henry Ford II

message: The "mercurial management style" paragraph could use some work.  The instances cited are not illustrative enough.  My library is a shambles but I'll look for some things... Pmeisel 02:52, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 23:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: He was arrested for drunk driving, if it's of any relevance to the article:
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=mugNAAAAIBAJ&sjid=qnkDAAAAIBAJ&pg=7392,1258216&hl=en
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=MrMtAAAAIBAJ&sjid=PNoFAAAAIBAJ&pg=3558,5309574&hl=en
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=UQ4oAAAAIBAJ&sjid=9QQGAAAAIBAJ&pg=1902,4945463&hl=en
24.23.73.72 (talk) 18:55, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drunk driving 

message: Does the final paragraph of the career section, on his management style, need some work? RJFJR (talk) 20:57, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyediting

message: I was surprised by the lack of inline cites. Wanted to bring it up here as opposed to putting 'citation needed' in several places where they would be welcome. This article is rather low priority for me at this time. Perhaps another editor would be willing to do some of the work. THX1136 (talk) 19:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inadequate inline cites 

message: Henry Ford II was not chair but chairMAN because that time the woke bullshit hasn't existed yet.--145.236.38.30 (talk) 12:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unwoking
Talk:Dakota Fanning

message: Hello.
My edit concerning Ms. Fanning's family history was reverted, and I was advised to discuss it on her talk page first, so that is what I'm doing now. The editor apparently wasn't sure that it was relevant...
As a genealogist, I think that it is relevant to discuss all aspects of a person on her page. True, we shouldn't add information on what she had for breakfast this morning, but this is not the same thing. Certain families in America, especially New English and Southern planter ones, usually set great store in genealogical research. If the Fannings didn't care about such research, why would there be footage of Elle Fanning talking about how excited she was about a new revelation concerning her ancestry?
Beyond just this, I would also point out that there are precedents. On Jane Fonda's page, for example, we're told that she's descended from Queen Jane Seymour of England, whom she is even named after. Emilia Clarke's page likewise talks about Ms. Clarke's descent from an Indian. Why, then, would Ms. Fanning's case be different? 
O.ominirabluejack (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: FTR, I don't think this is notable enough to include in the article. But I am withdrawing my objection to its addition right now, as nobody else has objected to it. However, if another editor objects and/or removes this from the article, then I think it should stay out until a consensus for its inclusion is demonstrated. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 15:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

text: FTR, I generally agree with what All Hallow's Wraith said on their Talk on the subject – they largely support my original comments. I would say that currently, there isn't consensus support for the inclusion of this in the article... (Note, also: WP:DAILYMAIL1 – these days the Daily Mail is considered WP:NOTRS, esp. for bio info at WP:BLPs.) --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:32, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say 350-400 years ago would be a good limit, at minimum, barring obvious exceptions like Queen Elizabeth II where her direct line of descent going back centuries and centuries is notable. All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 15:30, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

text: Thank you for weighing in, . So three hundred and fifty to four hundred years is the rough limit that you propose as far as the notability of ancestry goes, ? Fair enough. That would cover Knowles-Carter and Clarke, and Fonda as well I suppose, but not Ritchie. Anyway, I'll leave this matter as it is for the time being... Although I would advise against being so blasè about ancient ancestry more generally moving forward. Both my fellow Africans and a number of other non-Western ethnicities - such as the Maoris - derive their senses of being and places in society from genealogical antecedents that are even older than the ones being discussed here.
O.ominirabluejack (talk) 18:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dakota Fanning ancestry 

message: Her feature in the twilight saga. 109.158.147.65 (talk) 20:28, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Films and Characters
Talk:Comparison of file transfer protocols

message: On the Talk:File Transfer Protocol page is this, which is relevant here:
:So why FTP?
:Reading this article, I had one goal in mind: to figure out what advantages FTP has over HTTP. I didn't see any. Perhaps these could be added? —Simetrical (talk) 02:17, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Perhaps file transfer would be an even better place to discuss the benefits and drawbacks of various ways of moving files from one place to another. --75.37.227.177 20:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary and comparisons 

message: The individual messages transferred by the Network News Transfer Protocol could be considered "files".
Is NNTP a kind of file transfer protocol?
If not, what kind of protocol is it?
Many people sent files as email attachments.
Should we include NNTP and SMTP as a kind of "file protocol"?
If there is some other article (named what?)
that lists these other kinds of protocols, perhaps
we should just say "files are also often sent using protocols listed on the ___ list".
--75.37.227.177 20:37, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usenet news 

message: should we add gopher for that? ok, its old and not really used today, but for historical reasons... mabdul 0=* 13:58, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  gopher 

message: How about this? Or other P2P protocols? they are created for transfering data. (especially the zentralized (server)protocols...)?!? mabdul 0=* 16:53, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Bittorrent (protocol)]] 

message: FTAM is listed under heading "Primarily used with TCP/IP". That isn't really accurate. FTAM can be used over TCP/IP (via RFC1006), but in practice it was much more commonly used over X.25 instead.101.164.1.138 (talk) 21:37, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  FTAM
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Charles Darwin-Lincoln dispute

message: (William M. Connolley 09:38, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments from WMC 

message: I did at one point block Vp15 for violating 3RR, but this was taken off after he contacted his mediator. Dunc|☺ 11:00, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction: I was unblocked by McGiverMagic who is not my mediator. MGM remained neutral throughout the debate, and you'll notice that he was first to freeze the page, with the factoid off. Vincent 23:59, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments from Dunc 

message: I would like to ask the ArbCom to try and expedite this case as quickly as possible, since it is clear that Charles Darwin will remain protected until this case is resolved. Maybe some temporary injunctions? I am not up to speed with Arbitration rules...
--Nasrallah 20:39, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nasrallah comments 

message: I only saw this WP:RFAr because I was browsing WP:LAME and I thought this was patently ridiculous. I call for decisive action on the part of ArbCom. --JuntungWu 09:44, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:LAME 

message: This is a joke- literally, I linked here from comedic wiki Encyclopedia Dramatica! In fact, I feel embarrassed just to put my name into this bureaucratic clusterfuck. Srsly, people, let's just leave the fucking factoid be, and stop having such emotional problems. Wikipedia's content is 30% bureaucracy- as in, only 70% of WP is in the articles, etc. namespace. Jesus, I'm just adding to the problem!
Awesimo 04:15, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This whole debacle is an embarrasment to everything Wikipedia stands for.
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Rienzo

message: 148.136.141.172 is a computer belonging to the local administration in Linköping, Sweden (whois). It has been claimed that this is a public computer at a public library. The IP-number has created a lot of extra work for the administrators at Swedish Wikipedia because of slandering, insults etc.
In November, user LouiseR was nominated for administrator at the Swedish Wikipedia. In the following discussion, he/she was accused of using sock puppets. On November 15, he/she admitted to using the sock puppets CrystalFrame, Råsopen, Mässerschmidtt and Melde and also having registered at the English Wikipedia as User:Rienzo (in Swedish). From mid-november until mid-january he/she hardly made any edits at the Swedish wikipedia and I notice that the same is true for Rienzo.
LouiseR is a respected contributor of articles about clothing but just like Rienzo he/she has also edited articles dealing with christianity, Rome and the holy see.
Thuresson 04:17, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your comments.  I have copied them to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Rienzo/Evidence -- sannse (talk) 20:14, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: The en: Sockpuppets of this user have been banned from the en: Wikipedia for vandalism and extreme personal attacks for the duration of 3 months by the en: arbitration comittee - .''
However, some users on sv: sincerely believes this message 1) not to be written by someone from the english ArbCom, 2) has nothing to do with LouiseR, since this user is not mentioned in the message.
Hence this message has been removed from the user (talk) page of :sv:användare:LouiseR, and people are pretty annoyed (see e.g. :sv:Användardiskussion:Rudolf 1922 (in Swedish)). If this message is genuine and sanctioned by ArbCom, could someone please make an "official" confirmation of it on sv:? 
\Mikez 10:33, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Lost 116 pages

message: The article makes a claim. The arcane references is almost unintelligible/intelligible. I tried to fix this, but it was reverted. Can someone make heads or tails of the reference, and put it into plain English? because as it stands it looks like someone being tricky, to keep the claim of a deathbed confession in the article. It is a single reference given that apparently makes this claim, if someone could get the actual quotation so that we can make sure it does? and also rewrite the reference in plain language? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lost_116_pages&oldid=prev&diff=1076279422 Misty MH (talk) 07:37, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I would posit that the way this section is phrased is appropriate. As Doug Weller said in his edit summary, using "claim" here runs into WP:NPOV issues. I don't see any reason that the statement would be unreliable. Writing this in another way might get clunky: "Eldin Ricks said that Martin Harris said..." etc. This section however could probably use rewriting. Any thoughts on how it could be phrased? Rollidan (talk) 09:29, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the quotation's too long and the source from which it's taken too suspect. I've put the statement in a footnote so that the conclusion of the article doesn't appear so biased. John Foxe (talk) 00:45, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arcane reference used to make a claim in the article 

message: It will not be clear to many a reader (and is not clear to this reader) what "interpreters" means under section "The manuscript disappears". It apparently is not the "seer stones", and perhaps not the "spectacles", which at some point some article says was eventually used almost-interchangeably with "seer stones". What "interpreters" were taken away and then returned, according to a story in the article? Misty MH (talk) 04:33, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This article appears to equate the spectacles with interpreters: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urim_and_Thummim_(Latter_Day_Saints) Misty MH (talk) 05:12, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "interpreters"
Talk:Angular misalignment loss

message: * For example, a 30 degree source-to-waveguide misalignment would cause a loss proportional to some trig expression . 
* Think of a photon as a spinning top that changes orientation as it travels down the waveguide (eg: thru reflection). It is the axis of rotation that is compared.
Waveguy 04:32, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: some stuff to consider
Talk:Bankruptcy in the United States

message: This could use more discussion of recapitalization / valuation issues.--Nrdly101 (talk) 00:28, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recapitalization / valuation 

message: — Assignment last updated by ImagineWorldPeace (talk) 18:33, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Political Sociology
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-01-24/Veja

message: This newsstory was actually published in Veja's print version, edition number 1889, cover date 26 January 2005, page 92. It is made available in the magazine's website to their subscribers or to people who bought the print version, by using an access code. JoaoRicardo 05:47, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Tamil language/to do

message: Expand this area to see the To-do list
Feel free to add to this lists.
High priority
*Help add input for Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Indic) --Dangerous-Boy 04:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My suggestion too was similar. Get some audio samples of pronunciation, and if possible, samples of different dialects - the Kongu dialect, Madurai, Iyer tamil, Tirunelveli and more. An audio sample will take the difference to more people. --Chandrachoodan Gopalakrishnan
** Vadakkan has added a tongue twister audio file. Someone shall add aathichuudi. -- Sundar 05:58, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
*We should add a Tamil literature section. -- Sundar 15:10, Feb 17, 2005 (UTC)
*Get a map of Tamil-speaking regions. -- Sundar 05:58, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
**  Nichalp has created a map (pictured right) on our request. Let us thank him and suggest improvements if any are required. -- Sundar 03:52, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)
***The map must be modified to make the Indo-Pak border around Kashmir more NPOV. -- Paddu 16:00, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:CKUA Radio Network

message: "CKUA is one of the world's best and most unique radio services" is hardly NPOV.  This article also reads like a copyvio, though I can't find it.  RickK 06:06, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC)
I rewrote this article to the best of my ability. --Zippanova 02:11, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: There are a number of edits possible for this page. There is certainly more history that can be added, including the transitions from the U of A broadcaster through to present as a donor-supported station. In particular, the history of going off the air in 1997 is particularly interesting as a historical event. Robertwmartin (talk) 05:25, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plans for future edits
Talk:Roger Montgomery

message: Move comment from article page to here. RickK 06:50, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC):
I am writing this in my own words.  This is not a violation.  This is entirely original material.  Thank you for advising me on how best to proceed.  
-Peter Montgomery  , peter_mont@yahoo.com  ,  www.petermontgomery.com & www.rogermontgomery.info
Make sure to keep a NPOV here. A few parts dont seem completely neutral, so I will maybe touch some up. You may also have too much information about this person's history, try to keep timelines brief and concise. Chequers 04:48, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
Just a note on Roger - it is remarkable that he was professor and dean and so well-respected academically yet his highest degree was a Master's. - Lissa Montgomery 70.95.190.195 (talk) 19:38, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled