lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ibritumomab tiuxetan

message: I have now fixed the grammar mistakes and cleaned this article. I have also put it in the correct category. (72.136.49.4 00:22, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean! 

message: I think it is pronounced EYE-bri-TOOM-oh-mab, not IH-bri-TOOM-oh-mab. Regards, Blake3522 11:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Hi. I've removed the link to ibritumomab, which merely redirects back to this very page. The pronunciation is from an AOL site, I hope that's okay. I asssume they have (or had) the money to do it right, all else about AOL aside. Kenmcl2 15:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Circular Link

message: Hi.
In-111 Zevalin and Y-90 Zevalin are two different drugs. The terms "Zevalin" or "Ibritumomab tiuxetan" by themselves do not precisely refer to RIT. They are the cold antibody without the radioactive molecule attached.
Since yttrium emits pure beta radiation, it cannot be used to get a picture with a gamma camera. So the indium version is used instead for the pretreatment image (taken about one week before the tx day). Indium emits some gamma along with beta. 
The image is taken to make sure that the drug will go to where it should, and not go to where it shouldn't (e.g., excess amounts to marrow, liver, etc)
Kenmcl2 15:47, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: same point, so the formula C6382H9830N1672O1979S5499Y111In is wrong, its either Y-90 or In-111 so the MW is also probably wrong.--128.231.88.4 (talk) 21:36, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  two different drugs 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Zevalin® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#Zevalin® until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  BD2412 T 05:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Zevalin®" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Hella (band)

message: this song is on their myspace, anybody have any info on it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.0.193 (talk) 22:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: its from here grass roots Zopwx2 (talk) 17:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Friday the 13th

message: Question: is it good or bad that I keep completely rewriting this article? For what it's worth, the way it's organized now should allow it to be expanded on more easily than before. Blogbourri 18:43, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewriting

message: Out of curiosity, does anyone know why Dan and Jonathan left the group? Was it their decision? Zach/Spencer's? Mutual? Blogbourri 05:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dan and Jonathan's departure

message: I just started creating the hella discog. I'm going to add more info soon. Let me know if I fuck up and something is not right. Zopwx2 21:12, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Finished mostlyZopwx2 08:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the album The Devil Isn't Red needs to be fixed.  The correct title, as you can see on the album art should be "The Devil" Isn't Red, with distinct quotation marks around The Devil.--Jkdeadite 00:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography

message: This band article included album covers in its discography. These have had to be removed. Please see #1 under "unaccepable images" and WP:Albums#Discography. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images in discographies 

message: The stub for this album was redirected to the band's page about three months ago. The redirect was undone but I really don't see how the album is notable enough for a stand alone article. Prior to just reverting it back as a redirect, is there anything there worth merging into the band's page? Ifnord (talk) 14:20, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of There's No 666 in Outer Space into Hella (band)
Talk:U.S. Route 400

message: Approved by AASHTO November 11, 1994 - along US 166 from I-44 south of Joplin west to Baxter Springs, north on US 69 Alternate to Galena, north on US 69 to Pittsburg, west on US 160 to west of Parsons, west and northwest on new road to northwest of Fredonia, west on K-96 to south of El Dorado, west on US 54 to west of Greensburg, west and northwest on K-154 to Dodge City, north on US 56/US 283 to north of Dodge City, west and south on US 50 Business to west of Dodge City, west on US 50 to US 83 in Garden City (definitely some typos here)
Extension approved April 19, 1996 - from US 83 west on US 50 to US 385 in Granada
Relocation approved May 14, 2004 around Parsons
Does anyone know why the numbering violation?  What's special about the number 400 to folks in Kansas? dr-t 22:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

message: An IP user has been adding some new information about proposed additions to the intersections.  They've been bringing out a few table layout glitches, but I've managed to put those right (without, I hope, misplacing any of the data).  But the changes raise a couple of questions:
*Where is this information coming from;
*And probably more importantly, can someone explain that proposed end of freeway?  If that really is proposed as the end, what's to become of the portion that now comes after it?
Uporządnicki (talk) 16:16, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The latest edits--sources and an explanation
Talk:Small business software

message: Hardly anything general about Small business software after the initial pargraph, but lots of praise for Mr. Ellison, information about Intuit that is already in the companies article, the usual uncritical SaaS rhetoric, etc. --S.K. 04:07, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. --Sleepyhead 11:29, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation for <nowiki>{{npov}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{cleanup}}</nowiki> 

message: Please don't add large sections of unsourced content to this article. Flat Out let's discuss it 12:53, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced POV
Talk:Potboiler

message: Which term did Frank Marcuso term? Tentpole or potboiler? I just think that as both are terms you should clarify.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blazer410 (talk • contribs) 12:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which term? 

message: I would like to see better reference for this claim, please. Maikel (talk) 08:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A Christmas Carol, a potboiler?

message: Novels deemed to be potboilers may also be called pulp fiction or "page-turners"
English isn't my first language, but the term page turner has found its way into the German language and is used frequently in German book reviews. I'm a bit surprised to learn that the term has a negative connotation in the English language – at least that's how I understand the above cited sentence. I've only known the term as a synonym for a book that is so thrilling that you just can't put it down. The English Wictionary doesn't suggest an association between a page turner and a work of low quality, either (a written work, usually a novel, which is sufficiently interesting or suspenseful to keep the reader 'turning the pages'). Can someone clarify? 62.152.162.240 (talk) 07:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. Being a page-turner means the book is unputdownable, not that it's a pot-boiler, or that it's of poor quality. I took the liberty of removing the reference. Kwinkunks (talk) 14:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page turner? 

message: This item needs to be clearer: 
:In an early-1980s Time review of a book by Andrew Greeley, the author called his novel Thy Brother's Wife a "...putrid, puerile, prurient, pulpy potboiler".
''
Grammatically, "the author" appears to refer to Andrew Greeley rather than to the book reviewer, the implication is that Greeley reviewed his own book.
Perhaps better to say: The authors of a 1982 book review in Time magazine referred to Andrew Greeley's novel, Thy Brother's Wife, as a "...putrid, puerile, prurient, pulpy potboiler".
John Sinclair (talk) 14:44, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical usages 
Talk:G0-T0

message: Nigh Impossible to verify, but I suspect that the droid's name is a reference to the programming command 'GOTO'.  The command itself has often been derided by 'advanced' programmers, the thought being that GOTO shouldn't be used unless no other option is available.  Over-use is often considered a sign that the programmer is a novice.  The fact that the droid has a dark-side alignment leads me to wonder if there was maybe an in-joke that 'GOTO is Evil!' or something similar going on.  -Graptor
:/me nods. That makes sense, "goto considered harmful" and all that jive. Perhaps a mention should be added- I think I saw a similar theory on the Obsidian forums. --Maru (talk) 04:46, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name etymology
Talk:International School Manila

message: Whoever is doing it, I'd say that student council data doesn't belong. Procedures and the various councils maybe, but poor grammar in explaining how you can be elected doesn't. 147AM 05:26, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is in regard to the posting about International School Manila and the section marked "Controversies". What I am concerned about is the lack of balance displayed here - not so much in the content itself, but in the proportion of space devoted to this matter. 
This is a school with a 92 year old history and yet the biggest section by far in the Wikipedia entry refers to events that unfolded in three days. The cause of the controversy,a "rogue" Board of Trustees, was expelled by the community and the school has completely moved on. What draws the eye, though, in the entire entry is the "Controversy" piece, and I think that is unbalanced and unfair. It's as though you were writing a history of Britain and the biggest contribution was about the "Gunpowder Plot".
Where I come from there is a saying that "Today's front page news is tomorrow's fish and chip paper." Wikipedia clearly has a different view. You've taken the front page news from six years ago and are giving it undue and permanent prominence instead of letting it take its appropriate place within the history of the school.
People who read this entry will be given the mistaken impression that ISM is a school with a turbulent and controversial atmosphere and reputation, yet nothing could be further from the truth.
DToze (talk) 02:30, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   Controversies 

message: I think it is pertinent to create a notable alumni section (as is common with other intermediate/highschools). I'll begin to work on this. Please let me know if you know of any relevant people. Col99100 (talk) 20:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Went ahead and added in notable alumni. When I have time, will find more. Col99100 (talk) 19:26, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni
Talk:Manuel Lujan Jr.

message: *I've written an entry on Lujan based on contemporary press accounts that I think presents a balanced portrait of his career.  I posted it as the most current entry, which is basically a redo of the entire article since most of what preceeded it was either very brief or plagiarized from the NNBD article.
*Although I'm a Democrat, I still have to call it like I see it.  Unfortunately, the incidents presented here are not a complete biography, but only a series of gaffes not presented in context. Even though Lujan frequently made an ass of himself, information presented in this manner is not useful to a casual reader. Sorry.  207.195.255.228
:I deleted all of the text in question. It was plagiarized. Quatloo 23:41, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a discrepancy here- this article claims that Lujan was one of five inaugural members of the CHC in 1978.  However, the CHC's article does not include him among the five and places the year of organization in 1976.  The CHC web link also gives 1976 as the start date.The Original Historygeek (talk) 09:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Congressional Hispanic Caucus

message: I have removed mentions of Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham being his niece because according to the recent press release issued by the Governor's office regarding his death, Governor Lujan Grisham explicitly states that she was not his niece.--TommyBoy (talk) 21:50, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Following up on my previous comments, here is a link to the press release from the Governor's office.--TommyBoy (talk) 22:08, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham
Talk:Christian Death/Archive 2

message: Article is far too skewed in favor of Valor Kand's version by completely ignoring the fact (within the history section) that Williams' involvement did not end in 1985, but was renewed after losing a legal battle with Kand, forcing him to call his version "Christian Death featuring Rozz Williams" -- the current version of this article, as indicated in the body of the article, suggests that Williams ended his involvement in 1985, without further clarification. This is only mentioned in passing within the section regarding Valor Kand and blatantly skewed toward his version of events. Not a very neutral or encyclopedic way of approaching things. Laval (talk) 07:00, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Christian Death featuring Rozz Williams
Talk:Little Mac (disambiguation)

message: Page moved per request Ryan Norton T | @ | C 02:03, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:U.S. Route 301

message: A lot of the road was 4-laned, often with a median, in the late 1950s, making it the premier road for north-south traffic in the southeast U.S. While it was not limited in access, it often provided a bypass of cities and had relatively few stoplights. Would be nice to insert this with a citation. Student7 (talk) 23:50, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Should I create a branch for Georgia?--Ncchild (talk) 00:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If you don't, either I will, or someone else will. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  18:03, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have already thought of converting all the U.S. highway redirects for Georgia into full articles. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 18:40, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is further proof of my point. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  21:25, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: UPDATE After a year and a half, I finally made it. I'm sure it needs a few adjustments, and if anyone living near the road knows more than I do (which I'm sure they do), throw it in. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  20:44, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Georgia??
Talk:U.S. Route 501

message: Per WP:USRD/3STATE, an article should only have state-detail articles if the main article would be difficult to maintain due to length.  The entire length of US 501 is 355 miles, so length should not really be a factor. –Fredddie™ 23:27, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment - Do you plan to merge back North and South Carolina into the main article? Keep in mind the sordid past of US 501 in NC being originally together with US 15 and the desire of other editors wanting to break-out states because... reasons... Assuming you'll be doing the merging, what safeguards will be to make sure another editor doesn't show-up a few years down the road and break it out again or re-merge with US 15 (I had to fight a couple of editors on that in the past). --WashuOtaku (talk) 00:02, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I would merge all three state-detail articles to here.  I'm coming up with a gameplan.  I wouldn't half-ass it. –Fredddie™ 00:15, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

text: Support Needforspeed888 (talk) 06:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

text: Oppose -- There are too many details, primarily in Virginia. The other states can and should be expanded. -------User:DanTD (talk)  04:28, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 20:02, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If we were following the rules, the merge proposal would have failed months ago; not wait over a year later to getting a second person to agree then suddenly make it happen. Amused how it was not integrated in the merging, it's basically three articles slapped together. --WashuOtaku (talk) 20:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have cleaned up the merged article by combining the junction lists and infoboxes together along with cleaning up the route description a bit. Dough4872 00:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[U.S. Route 501 in South Carolina]]
Talk:U.S. Route 601

message: On WikiProject:US Roads, you said that if an American road only goes through two states, there will not be separate pages.  Since US 601 is a long route, I guess this may be an exception. 174.98.21.222 (talk) 00:13, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no WP:SPLIT reason to split this article. Per Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Notability, the 2 sections need to be independently notable. I can see no evidence that the sections are independently notable. Given the length of time that the split tag has been there, I am removing it. I will happily set up an RfC if that is not acceptable. Op47 (talk) 18:38, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting with your own rules
Talk:The Bodysnatchers (band)

message: Maybe this should be a disambiguation page, linking to body-snatching as well? --64.142.79.223 06:26, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree, and we might want to nominate this page for deletion, as the band is not really notable (and is mentioned in the Belle Stars article). ProhibitOnions 14:07, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article should be deleted. They weren't that Popular!
:Actually, they were ;o) --Nagasheus (talk) 09:03, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They were an important part of the 2 Tone movement, and are still discussed frequently on fan websites, so the article should stay. Pollythewasp (talk) 16:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete it! 
Talk:Cucamonga Peak

message: Sierra Club gives the height as 8859 ft - is 8599 a typo? - PKM 03:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Height

message: It seems strange but the benchmark on the summit of this peak is name Telegraph Peak. Telegraph Peak is located to the north of Cucamonga Peak.
Still National Geodetic Survey data are considered among most accurate available.
:I'm not sure I understand - are you referring to the physical brass marker or to something on a map, or...?  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 04:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Telegraph Peak
Talk:U.S. Route 3

message: I made a small contribution to this article by beginning to format it in accordance with the project.  The article is still needs work, specifically the table that now resides in the NH section could be re-homed or incorporated in another way...  JordanSealy 13:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rewritten the table in the New Hampshire termini section as prose, but I did so with no actual knowledge of the history (randomly stumbled on this page).  I don't know, for instance, why the highway shrank in 1939 back to its original northern terminus.  Hopefully someone who knows will explain that, and maybe spruce up the text with more information.  --ScottAlanHill 03:56, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: I've added the route description for the central part of NH.  It may be missing some towns whose villages or centers it doesn't cross, as well as junctions and joinings with other numbered routes other than I-93 in Franconia Notch.  It's also short on geographical commentary (notable river crossings, proximity to the mountains, etc). Magicpiano (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NH route description

message: The article here makes two conflicting claims; that US 3 starts and MA 3 ends at either the Longfellow Bridge or the Harvard Bridge.  There's also a claim that AASHTO states that US 3 begins at the Boston University Bridge.  So, which bridge is it?  Does anyone have an actual good source for this routing?  --Jayron32 11:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which bridge is it? 

message: This article contradicts itself.  In one place, it says that the southern terminus is on the Longfellow Bridge, presumably at Charles Circle.  Another place says that the southern terminus is on Memorial Drive, at its interchange with MA 2A (Mass Ave / Harvard Bridge).  Which is correct?  It used to be ambiguous as to whether its southern terminus was on Memorial Drive, at its interchange with the BU Bridge (MA 2), or if US 3 and MA 3 split and US 3 overlapped MA 2 across the BU Bridge and ended at Commonwealth Ave (US 20).  So it seems that there are 4 different possible locations for the southern terminus of US 3:
Longfellow Bridge at Charles Circle (Boston)
Memorial Drive at MA 2A (Mass Ave / Harvard Bridge) interchange (Cambridge)
Memorial Drive at BU Bridge interchange (Cambridge)
BU Bridge at Commonwealth Ave (US 20) (Boston / Brookline border)
Mitsguy2001 (talk) 16:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern Terminus
Talk:South Australian Museum

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect South Australian Institute. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:45, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The result of the discussion was </noinclude>Withdrawn</div><noinclude>. by nominator. (non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian (talk) 12:26, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "South Australian Institute" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:20 minutos

message: Daily of general information and free distribution with local editions in different Spanish cities.
The business:
Multiprensa & Mas S.L.  Founded in Madrid in 1999, it is a pioneer in publishing quality free daily newspapers in Spain.  Its majority stockholder is 20 Min Holding, leader in the market of quality free daily newspapers in Switzerland, France and Spain.  The majority stockholder of 20 Min Holding is Schibsted, a communication group of Norwegian origin which was founded in 1839, is listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange and has a strong presence in Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Switzerland, Estonia, Finland, France and Spain, where it is the owner of paid and free newspapers, television stations, radio stations, multimedia, etc.
The directors:
Sverre Munck.  President of Multiprensa Holding.  Norwegian, 51 years old, economist, Ph.D. from Stanford and Yale Universities, Munck is the president of Multiprensa Holding, owner of the publisher of 20 Minutes in Spain, Multiprensa & Mas.  Besides, he is the president of the 20 Min Holding group and vice president of Schibsted, the leading communication group of Norway and majority stockholder of 20 Min Holding.  He is also delegate advisor of 20 Minutes France and 20 Minutes Switzerland.
--Metropolitan90 07:06, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation
Talk:Bayreuth Festspielhaus

message: The Bayreuth Festspielhaus was not designed by Gottfried Semper. It was designed by Otto Brueckwald, an architect from Leipzig. Richard Wagners Ideas based on the discussion with Semper during his swiss exile. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.150.70.60 (talk) 07:30, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Semper

message: Please keep information pertinent to the Bayreuth Festival (such as performance schedules, ticket information, history, etc etc) on the Festival's article page.  This article should be devoted to the structural, architectural innovations of the Festspielhaus, not general info on the festival itself. Dottore So 10:22, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Festival

message: It appears that the original design was much more ambitious, as the current appearence is modest, and relatively free of the typical ornamentation of the period. I placed the designs in the gallery but they are not consistent with the actual building when you compare the pictures.Ekem 03:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Design

message: Though the inside is described in some detail, there are no pictures of the inside. These would be greatly helpful.RSido (talk) 03:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insides? 