Talk:Cofidis (cycling team)

message: :Image:Equipe cofidis pub.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Equipe cofidis pub.gif

message: This is in reference to the sentence: "Armstrong was released from the team because of his cancer diagnosis." The word released does imply that Armstrong strongly wished for his $2.5 million Cofidis sponsorship to be ended, and the kind people at Cofidis 'released' him of such funding. In reality, as his autobiography reveals, all of his other sponsors kindly stood by him and maintained their original deals, except for Cofidis, which sent executives to visit him in hospital during his chemotherapy and threaten to make him take a physical exam, which seems more like being 'dropped' to put it most diplomatically, certainly not released. I know its just one word, but it really does change the meaning entirely, and puts Cofidis in an undeservedly good light. Tell me what you think.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.43.106 (talk) 18:54, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The symbol is to the left of the "1". J.delanoygabsadds 21:13, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Released' or 'Dropped'?

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Oppose.  The argument in favor of the proposed name is not supported by WP policy, guidelines or conventions.  The argument in opposition to the proposed move is consistent with WP policy, guidelines and conventions, as follows.  The most commonly used name for this team is Cofidis, and that is also the most easily recognized name. The cycling team information in parenthesis is the standard WP method for adding precision per disambiguation rules.  The current name is a model for others to follow.   --Born2cycle (talk) 04:46, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Cofidis (cycling team). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080314025734/http://sports.yahoo.com:80/sc/news to http://sports.yahoo.com/sc/news;_ylt=Al08HqTE2q4Lygrrlu3_mRw5nYcB?slug=ap-tourdefrance&prov=ap&type=lgns
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:03, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified