lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nagarathar

message: I'm afraid that, on review, the OTRS ticket referenced above is not usable for text on Wikipedia because the correspondent deliberately withheld the right to modificawtion: "Yes i do allow, without changing the version or defacing and removing my name". This is not compatible with the license. Any content remaining from the original will need to be removed, accordingly. I'm hoping that there isn't any, but will see what I can find. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:47, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Fortunately, it is indeed all gone: , . --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:58, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: OTRS permission problem

message: Wikipedia requires that cited sources are reliable. There is a long-standing consensus that sources affiliated with castes are not reliable, and indeed often turn out also to be self-published. This is why I have been removing some content.
Equally, if something is said in a reliable source and it is relevant to the article subject then we should show it. In the event that there are several reliable sources and they say different things about a particular issue, our policy regarding neutrality means that we should show all of those opinions. It is for this reason that I have reinstated some words removed today but sourced to Pamela G. Price, who is an reliable academic. - Sitush (talk) 12:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 

message: most of the content added to this article is deleted stating the reliability without any details . person who are interested in deleting the content should try to add content with own research. without any research sitush is deleting content for long time. article deserve content which are not available in internet. offline sources must be valuated before deleting  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.65.45.255 (talk) 12:37, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I am unsure what relevance this may have to improvement of the article but please note that we cannot base our statements on things that you have heard. Please read WP:V. - Sitush (talk) 03:18, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article should contain many sources 

message: I remove this  image. Although the picture file's name is "Nagarathar-colombo-chetty.jpg", the Colombo Chetties are according to this source ;
:
Xenani (talk) 23:41, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing image 

message: The ugly thruth and possibilities 188.150.78.232 (talk) 12:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychological facts
Talk:Eames Lounge Chair

message: Anyone know why this chair is so important it is found in museums and is a highly sought after collectors piece? I'd love to know more about the history of it! Fxer 06:12, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Part of the reason there is still so much hype around it is related to the fact that it's still considered a 'modern classic' after 50 years. This year is actually the 50th year anniversary. Also, you don't always find comfort paired with innovative design. Check out www.hermanmiller.com for more information/history on the Eames Lounge and Ottoman. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bnj2377 (talk • contribs) 20:05, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is it so notable? 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support See Google Ngram (note that this includes usage in titles and section headings). Jojalozzo 19:52, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not seeing that:  .  Please say more.  Dicklyon (talk) 04:58, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: See here.  As I would have expected, most cases of all-three-capitalized "Eames Lounge Chair" are in headings which (WP notwithstanding) are almost always written in title case. The product is the Eames Chair, model number 670.  It has some variants that include the word chair, like "Eames Lounge Chair Wood", but this article isn't about them in particular. "Chair" is a disambiguator that some sources are adding, and we don't seem to have a reason to capitalize it.  I would otherwise, but too many sources indicate it is not actually a part of the formal name of the product/design.  Similarly, my MacPro is a MacPro computer, not a MacPro Computer, despite the fact that I can find some sources that refer to it with such over-capitalization.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  11:33, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Heim ins Reich

message: I am not sure who put the "contradiction" tag on, can the author explain? It also seems that the last sentence (about "not being a cause for WWII") belongs on the talk page. Then maybe the contested statement could be changed.Eugen Ivan 06:13, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Both the last sentence "not being a cause for WWII" and the first sentence "was LARGELY responsible for the outbreak of WWII" have been removed. Who wrote this who thinks they have the sociological authority to designate this one concept THE MOST IMPORTANT factor leading to WWII. That's just absurd. Hvatum 17:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Missing the deaths of the Polish original inhabitants, their reactions, including mass kiling of these settlers (e.g. in the Cieszyn village near Lublin: 160 murdered by the AK partisans), post WW2 fates etc. Zezen (talk) 12:56, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much too short 

message: In re this edit: ,  Marc Rikmenspoel is a Waffen-SS apologist; he's included in this section: Waffen-SS_in_popular_culture#Popular_history. Eddy de Bruyne is an author of unknown credentials; the only thing I see about him is that he had contacts with the Walloon legion troopers  & collects wartime photos of Leon Degrelle & the legion's personnel: . I should not have used "trivia" in the edit summary, but these authors are not reliable sources for the topic of this article. -- K.e.coffman (talk) 12:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: please see above. --K.e.coffman (talk) 17:49, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the delay: I've restored your deletion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eddy de Bruyne & Marc Rikmenspoel
Talk:Keramat Habib Noh

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:08, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: I will be improving this article. Adding some sources here so that it can be easily looked up later.
* Historic hilltop shrine for renowned Muslim saint set for upgrade - FEB 12, 2015 (Straits Times)
--Lemongirl942 (talk) 01:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I have actually moved the page, but apparently, someone moved it back and said "that it must come under discussion". Seems like there are so call "rules", even in Wikipedia.
In addition to the Makam, there is also the Haji Md Salleh mosque adjacent to the makam. Both institutions are under the same administrationhjmuhdsalleh.org.sg, with the mosque's management overseeing the upkeeping of Makam Habib Noh. It makes perfect sense to move the page to "Masjid Haji Muhammad Salleh & Makam Habib Noh".32cravenfan (talk) 09:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving the Page to Masjid Haji Muhammad Salleh & Makam Habib Noh 
Talk:The Godfather Saga

message: Fan of The Godfather may wish to participate in the AfD debate concerning whether the article The Godfather films in popular culture, which was spun off from this article to keep it from being too unwieldy, should be deleted.  That debate can be found here.  The article in question provides a place for people to note instances which illustrate the continuing influence of The Godfather and its sequels on films, TV shows and other popular culture media. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ed Fitzgerald (talk • contribs) 00:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of "The Godfather films in popular culture" under consideration 

message: This article says "It originally aired on NBC over four consecutive nights (one three-hour segment and three two-hour segments)". But it also says the running time is only a little over 7 hours. That maths doesn't add up! --StrexcorpEmployee (talk) 12:40, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The 7 hour running time doesn't account for the 2 hours of commercials SonnyGFunk (talk) 22:52, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length?
Talk:Great Dangaioh

message: If anybody it's interested, this things should be noticed about this series: 
01) Originality is surely not her mark: the three Dangaioh pilots remember a milder version of the   three pilots of the Evangelions, from the eponym 1995 anime3 series. Also, the whole structure of   the organization and of the base Agwaruda remembers a watered version (with a lot less "demons")   of Evangelion's Nerv, with an almot one to one relation between the cast of the two series.     Also, although if the very concept of the series seems to be a reprise of old mecha anime motifs,   the fact that the overall series plot seems pretty much that of Mazinger Z (with, also, the    "shake-hands" between Mazinger Z/Dangaioh and Great Mazinger/Great Dangaioh at the end of episode    13) doesn't help very much.
02) The article on Dangaioh (OVA) seems to imply that the series was cancelled, due to poor reviews   and ratings. The plot, in effects, seems to be somewhat inachieved and the Mecha that gives the    name to the series appears at the very end of episode 13- the last one. But this is not    "Waiting for Godot". A "rule of thumb" of storytelling is that a story may be divided in four    qurters, the fist dedicated to cast and background presentation, the two central quarters to the   "action" and the last one to the resolution of all the narrative loose ends  (Will Eisner,    Comics and Sequential art). Great dangaioh stops dead on its trail, at the peak of the "action".
03) Characters design is an average professional one, but somewhat it fell short on one prioritary goal: to allow an easy recognition of the cast. In some occasions, it becomes difficult to    ascertain who you are actually watching... also, the fact that the cast is quite wide and almost an entirely femininine one as his weight on this.  00:58, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Félix Candela

message: This section of the article is fairly incomprehensible.  Does anyone have access to the cited book or understand the intent of what's being said? Djfgregory (talk) 21:15, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casino de la Selva section 
Talk:Providence (1977 film)

message: The final credits of Providence read:
Claude Langham: Dirk Bogarde - Francous Perier
Kevin Woodford: David Warner - Gerard Depardieu
Sonia Langham: Ellen Burstyn - Nelly Borgeaud
Clive Langham: John Gielgud - Claude Dauphin
What does this mean? Is there an alternate French version of this film with Gerard Depardieu in the David Warner part and Claude Dauphine in the John Gielgud part? I see no record anywhere of such a thing
What on earth is the story behind the final credits of this film?
Noahveil (talk) 01:58, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The French Names in the credits refer to the actors who  did the voice-overs for the French version of the film. 2603:8001:9502:4605:41E6:25DC:ABC7:2AF5 (talk) 17:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Final Credits 
Talk:Mrs. Miniver

message: I saw this excellent movie for the first time the other night on TCM.  However, I was startled by the similarity of the "flower show" subplot to a subplot in the recent PBS/BBC Masterpiece Theater production of "Downton Abbey."FLAHAM (talk) 00:19, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "And loses her daughter-in-law as a casualty" is a spoiler, since it happens very near the end of the film. I think someone should either remove it or change it to say something else. Lionboy-Renae (talk) 04:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The general guideline is that articles do not omit information on that ground. See WP:SPOILER. "It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot." William Avery (talk) 06:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler in the introductory paragraph 

message: The statement in the lead section that the film is "based on" the book of the same name by Jan Struther is misleading. The book, to explain to anyone who has not read it, is a series of anecdotal essays which reads like a diary, full of lively interactions between family and friends, and reflections on how life was for them all at that time, the year before the outbreak of World War II. According to the information on the back cover, the book is a compendium of the series of essays published as a column by "Mrs Miniver" in The Times before the War. Yes, in the book there is shown the shadows of danger, mild experience of shortages, and gas masks, the word JEWS significant on a newspaper board, but the reality of the air-raids and the fighter planes and Dunkirk and personal loss, none of that had arrived and does not appear in the book. However, Valerie Grove, in her introduction to Mrs Miniver explains that Jan Struther, when she was in America, did help in the film. The screenplay does not follow any narrative in the book: it (almost) the same family, the screenplay rather continues as a sequel to where the book ended. A small change to the lead section will correct the impression it gives, and I shall try to think of something unless someone else can. Thank you. P0mbal (talk) 22:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much is the film based on the book by Jan Struther? 
Talk:Out of This World (American TV series)

message: I have a quibble with this trivia item:
:Troy never physically appeared on the show except in the final episode as a shimmering outline of light. Only his voice was heard for most of the series. 
He appears in the theme song of every episode--though his face is never shown.  Also, I distinctly remember an episode where Evie travels back in time and, because of some kind of mishap, is forced to arrange her parents' first meeting a la Back to the Future.  There again we saw Troy as a faceless silhouette at the end of that episode. 24.239.167.213 08:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I have a question for The JPS.  I do not mean to question your decision about the theme song.  I certainly know very little about copyright law and things of that nature, so I'll defer to your wisdom.  My question, though, is why use of the theme song to illustrate THIS article would not qualify as a fair use? Thanks for any information you have and keep up the great work.--Evadb 06:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. It's not 'illustrating' the article, though, really. And the article isn't even about the song. There are many detailed articles dedicated to songs, and even there we cannot use their lyrics. Sorry. The JPS 11:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  I was not aware that lyrics couldn't be used in song articles (not a subject that I've ever edited). It all makes sense.  Thanks very much.--Evadb 12:58, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme Song 

message: I have made a major update to this article including much more detail about the characters, adding a guest appearances section, and writing a section about the cube. I have also completely re-structured the article to eliminate the “trivia” section, in line with Wikipedia’s policy of not having trivia sections. Please note that I have not deleted anything — everything was moved to some other section, or re-worded. If anyone has any isse with anything I added, please discuss it here. I love this show! Many thanks. Grand Dizzy (talk) 23:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAJOR update to this article 

message: The opening sequence uses a segment of stock footage of two Starfighters from Buck_Rogers_in_the_25th_Century_(TV_series)Bizzybody (talk) 08:32, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ... okay.  Are you proposing to include this information in the article?  If so, do you have a reliable source that corroborates it?  Powers T 13:33, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening sequence 

message: Whoever wrote this article probably just watched it on an NBC affiliate that picked up the syndication.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.226.99.120 (talk) 20:03, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This wasn't on NBC, it was syndicated
Talk:The World Academy of Sciences

message: this is good idea the academy of sciences for the developing world
does any one want to got identify such as third world member , I think it might be change next time , that is not better to have organization with such name ,we never accept that we are third world ,who had give this name ?of course we are thoroughly equal . 
my nation never belive that they are third word.....akbar mohammadzade--78.38.28.3 (talk) 07:05, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: giving identify card
Talk:Per Degaton

message: The credits page states the book collects issue #'s 66-75, and it collects segments of #66 & #67 that have Degaton-related pages as a 'Prologue,' but despite the fact that they weren't the 'main' story in those issues, they were in fact there, so it's appropriate to include their numbers in the story arc count, even if the entire issues weren't devoted to the arc; issue 75 had Degaton's appearance at Atom-Smasher's 'death' to gloat about it to Stargirl, while 73 & 74 had the elements that led to it and formed the basis of Degaton's prediction and so, part of the arc.  Thanks.  Starmiter 05:05, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I changed it without reading this first, so apologies, but 73 & 74 don't really count. He appears in 75, but 73 & 74 don't really pertain to him at all. 75 just has him showing up again. I don't disagree about 66 & 67, but it's about appearances, and Degaton didn't appear in 73 or 74, and had nothing to do with that arc beyond his appearance at the end. Kusonaga 07:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Black Vengeance Trade

message: The Chronal Duplicate section is far too detailed and needs to edited. But from the plot summary in the previous section, I'm confused how the Duplicate was able to do anything if he was in the time machine with Zee and then killed immediately after his arrival in the 1987. That needs to be cleared up (the paragraph about Grayson's diary adds to the confusion, as it's not clear how that storyline fits with the Infity, Inc. storyline or when the retcon was put in place.) Thanks, Aristophanes68 (talk) 19:55, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up needed, June 2012
Talk:Contortion

message: Is that really a robust study? 78.86.6.227 (talk) 00:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample size of 5 re study on risks 

message: This section does not look good: it lacks the introduction that should have explained the reasons for selection of particular performers(cf. MOS:LISTINTRO), has potentially nearly unlimited size (cf. :Category:Contortionists that has almost 40 articles of notable contortionists and out list of 18 people plus two red links). IMHO the section shall be rewritten using some source with the list of most know contortionists or deleted altogether. Викидим (talk) 06:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "List of notable contortionists"
Talk:Jim Perrin

message: Is it perhaps worth creating a short separate section on this, as part of the main body of the article? Currently there is only one external link to the website Jac's Sisters, which has substantial material on Perrin, but I haven't been able to locate any corroborating sources yet. I am also a little concerned that a user who appears to be Perrin at one point even removed the link (described in the edit log as "correcting malicious interpolated falsehoods.")
Franciscrot (talk) 15:01, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticisms and Controversy

message: It seems overzealous to have tagged this. Perrin's status is self-documenting from the references given. Go to Amazon and check the books eg on Don Whillans exist; go to the Guardian and check that his recent obit of Brede Arkless exists. I shall remove this tag by noon today. Linuxlad 07:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All articles should WP:CITE reliable sources, no exceptions.  See also WP:V and WP:RS. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 07:30, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this way madness lies! The article cites two books and a major British newspaper. Do you want those explicitly put in a bibliography? Do you think the the guy is made up? (*) I shall certainly untag on the basis of what you've written so far. Bob Linuxlad 07:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added two references. Thanks for paying attention, Can't sleep. Bob, you might want to look around a little on other (preferably featured) articles on how claims are properly sourced. Looking over Can't sleep's links helps too. Good luck editing. ~ trialsanderrors 03:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: unreferenced tag
Talk:Dali Kingdom

message: The name of the Kingdom on the map is wrong: "Nanzhao" instead of "Dali". How revert to the old version of the map (with the right name)? Polybe 17:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: The Duan Kings of Dali claimed their ancestors were Han Chinese from Wuwei in Gansu. 武威段氏
:[Link spamming commented out below:]
: — LlywelynII 05:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Kings of Dali claimed Han Chinese origin, not Bai 

message: OED has enfeoff as a synonym under the entry for enfief, but no entry for enfeoff. Readers will be more familiar with fief, as in fiefdom, etc. Mathyeti (talk) 22:33, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "enfeoffed" 

message: Famed for its high quality marble, Dali (dàlǐ 大理) literally means "marble" in Chinese.
no, 大理石 (Dali stone) is marble.  no one removes the word stone when speaking of marble.
119.236.47.178 (talk) 01:29, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone please fix this
Talk:Joyce Meyer

message: add a picture please 209.0.112.16 (talk) 15:51, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: Wikipedia only uses free licensed images. I have placed a  on the talkpage. If you have an image, please re-open the request with the image. Regards,  DRAGON BOOSTER  ★ 16:46, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2018 

message: "... After her divorce, Meyer frequented local bars before meeting Dave Meyer, ..." what is this supposed to mean? She worked at pubs in that town every day until she met someone? Or did she not go to work anymore and instead sat in the pubs for 8 hours every day? Or did she go to the pub daily to desparately find a substitute man for herself, which seems illogical? Or what is this supposed to mean? Should she have gone shopping instead every day? Stay in movie theaters every day? Or, alas, go to the workplace as anyone else? Everyone goes to the pub after their 8 hours of work for a beer and a chat as part of social life in Western societies. After her divorce, she met that Meyer after some time. Nothing more, nothing less.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C0:DF17:E900:41E6:E277:2A60:DF8 (talk) 17:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It means what the Reliable Source states - nothing more, nothing less.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.41.243 (talk) 11:36, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrational