Talk:Martin McGartland

message: Some more references, not yet used.  
Tyrenius 06:42, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Which came first. Was he in the IRA and then agreed to inform, or did he agree to inform and then join the IRA (which some texts indicate, by saying he "infiltrated" the IRA)?  Tyrenius 07:10, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is called an informer by secondary sources. O Fenian (talk) 11:29, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

text: You have been warned enough times about adding unsourced commentary. Also agent implies some sort of legitimacy, rather than a traitor who sold out for money. With 55 results for "IRA agent" versus 556 results for "IRA informer", it is obvious which is the term generally used. O Fenian (talk) 18:05, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

text: It tells us what he is described as by a factor of ten. Please stop edit warring against consensus on multiple articles, you are being disruptive and gaming the system. O Fenian (talk) 13:20, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Here are the first 2 lines of the article: "Martin McGartland, born in 1970, is a former Provisional Irish Republican Army informer[1] who joined the organisation in order to pass information to British security forces. When he was exposed as an informer in 1991..." The word informer or information appears three times. Once would do especially as 'informer' is a pejorative term and McGartland is notoriously litigious.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fynire (talk • contribs) 21:53, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The word informer appears twice, not three times. The second time is necessary as "was exposed in 1991" makes little sense. Informer is a neutral term for someone who informs, which is what he did. It does not take a trained legal expert to tell you any litigation being brought over being called an informer (which is what reliable sources call him) would be laughed out of court. Or do you think he would complain to newspapers about Wikipedia? O Fenian (talk) 23:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  You know as well as I do O Fenian that the term informer is not neutral in Ireland but my first objection is to the overuse of the word in just two lines, be it informer (twice) or passing information (same effect). Once will do. Being 'exposed' is entirely understandable in the context.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fynire (talk • contribs) 14:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So you object to this tout being called an informer despite him being called that by hundreds of reliable sourcess, yet you insist on calling Eamon Broy an informer with zero reliable sources? I can see what is going on here.. O Fenian (talk) 15:26, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  You don't need any more sources to tell you that both Broy and McGartland were in the business of passing information to their supposed enemies so both were informers or double agents. It is just a fact. Live with it.--Fynire (talk) 20:26, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia does not work that way. O Fenian (talk) 09:43, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  You do not need to source that Broy was an informer, it follows from the description of his actions. And Wikipedia does not work through pejorative over statement. One 'inform'Fynire (talk) 10:58, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes you do need to source that, it is how Wikipedia works. O Fenian (talk) 11:03, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Pejorative in Ireland you say? And McGartland's self-aggrandising novel defines informer as "A person who passes information to the police", which he did! No evidence of it being pejorative, except the word of someone who believes the BBC are not neutral and can therefore be ignored as lacking any semblance of neutrality. O Fenian (talk) 17:37, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree, that an editor believes that the BBC are not a neutral is without doubt pushing some kind of agenda. BigDunc 17:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

text: I know it is a pejorative term. The tag team you belong to know it is a pejorative term. Think of Liam O'Flaherty's novel. O Fenian calls him a tout so he is parti pris with a giant agenda.  By the way the BBC is not by definition neutral and often isn't. My concern is your ramming your bias home with three uses in a few lines. 
The deal is one use in the opening paragraph.--Fynire (talk) 21:35, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I for one am also of the opinion that not everything printed/reported by the BBC is neutral but here on wikipedia it is a verifiable, reliable source and thats all that counts here. BigDunc 21:39, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: So you "know", despite Sean O'Callaghan using it to describe himself and McGartland giving a simple definition for it? I simply choose words that I would use in everyday language, and the word "tout" is not exclusive to republicans either. Your own dislike of factual non-pejorative terms  is no reason to insist on poor English. As said before, simply "exposed" is unclear wording, and I see no reason why it should be changed to suit your bias. Obviously you need to actually introduce him as an informer prior to that, so the first one is also needed. Feel free to suggest a rewording of the part about passing information if the third use offends you so much, I am all ears. However your deal demand is not acceptable. O Fenian (talk) 21:45, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree OF, this has been explained, again and again.--Domer48'fenian' 16:10, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Adding multiple lengthy quotes about the film don't really belong on a biographical article, and also I don't see the need for these lengthy self-serving quote from the book either, when he's written two books what's the significance of that quote?--Domer48'fenian' 16:20, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This POV bullshit is really getting on my tits. McGartland specifically infiltrated the Provisional IRA to feed back information to the RUC therefore he is an AGENT, not an informer as that would have applied to him only had he been turned whilst inside the organisation as in the case of Sean O'Callaghan and numerous others. Let's keep our idealogies out of this and just attempt to write an accurate encyclopedia for the sake of the readers, shall we?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Volunteer and informer or agent

message: I have once again removed highly point-of-view and unsourced changes. To document one of the most egregious examples, "Martin McGartland was a special Agent and was not and never was a member of the IRA". Really? Exactly what contract was he under? He makes no such claim in his book, he was a standard paid informer. As for him never being a member of the IRA, completely contradicted by his book. The word "agent" is also misleading, since its meaning in English varies substantially according to location. He was an informer, say RTÉ, the Guardian, the Independent, the Belfast Telegraph, the BBC, the Irish Independent, 4NI and countless more, including senior Special Branch officer Ian Phoenix who describes McGartland as an informer in McGartland's own book! This article is not being written in the way McGartland would like himself to be described, not when all those use the wholly accurate label of informer. The lead notes his motiviation for joining the IRA, so the wholly incorrect "was not and never was a member of the IRA" is not necessary. If the rest needs to be discussed, so be it, but I have already demonstrated how deep the problems with the edit run. O Fenian (talk) 10:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent changes

message: Is there any evidence the website is actually official? Any webmaster can add the word official to a page, it doesn't make it so. Is there any verifiable connection between the third-party webmaster and Martin McGartland? 2 lines of K303 10:32, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Website?

message: Hi, first of all I find the article very readable and informative. One problem I have is eg " He occasionally drove IRA punishment squads around and overheard them boast about the beatings they had meted out to their victims, many of whom were innocent people who had somehow incurred the wrath of a member of the IRA." The reference here is his book. Would it not be more accurate to say "He says..."
This applies to a lot of the content that is presented as fact when it is his story. I'm not doubting anything, just that its presented as verified and it isn't, not by the references anyway. I'm not suggesting heavy editing out of things, but maybe a reframing in certain parts for accuracy. Thoughts? Cjwilky (talk) 06:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: His book is not self-published so it qualifies as a reliable source.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:51, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

text: Have to agree. It is in effect a primary source and should be treated with considerable circumspection. RashersTierney (talk) 10:21, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

text: .I changed the above sentence to read "He recounted in his book that he occasionally drove IRA punishment squad....".--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 17:47, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Reads better :) I think a problem here is that by the nature of what he was involved in, detailed reports are thin on the ground outside of his personal recollections. So I think its valid to use those recollections if they are stated as such. To do that wholesale through the article would be the correct thing to do, although there's a balance to be struck with readability. Cjwilky (talk) 20:46, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It already mentions in the lead that he is the author of two books about his life as an agent. Each statement is sourced to the page number. And Liam Clarke's article verifies most of the statements.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 07:08, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of reference 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Martin McGartland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.martinmcgartland.co.uk/about-me.php
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.irishecho.com/search/searchstory.cfm?id=3519&issueid=84
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://archives.tcm.ie/irishexaminer/1999/06/18/ihead.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://w02.timeout.com/film/features/show-feature/7273/is-fifty-dead-men-walking-really-based-on-truth.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Martin McGartland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071006133552/http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.com/pa/cm199899/cmstand/nirelg/st990624/90624s01.htm to http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.com/pa/cm199899/cmstand/nirelg/st990624/90624s01.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140307183039/http://www.sharedtroubles.net/storydetail.php?story_id=1108 to http://www.sharedtroubles.net/storydetail.php?story_id=1108
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:31, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Martin McGartland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304083848/http://isbndb.com/d/book/fifty_dead_men_walking.html to http://isbndb.com/d/book/fifty_dead_men_walking.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)