lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Association football

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. WP:SNOW and contradicts WP:NCSP. (closed by non-admin page mover) CLYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 01:12, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 June 2023 

message: A chance to be aggressively British (and informative and truthful).
I think the IFAB vs FIFA relationship has been poorly defined. In effect (My interpretation) football is not governed by FIFA, but by IFAB. FIFA is the executive and judicial branch, with the asterix that the Swiss courts and the international Court of Arbitration for Sports also has something to do with it. But the legislative branch is clearly the IFAB, although then 50% of the IFAB votes are with FIFA. IS this interesting, relevant in the context of this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.70.212.10 (talk) 03:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIFA vs IFAB 

message: Add Futbol boots to equipement 70.25.127.82 (talk) 14:12, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 12:18, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 September 2023 

message: Change "The word soccer arrived at its final form in 1895" to "The word soccer arrived at its current form in 1895". We do not know that language will not continue to evolve so "final" does not seem right. All we know is the current form is soccer. 2604:3D09:A481:FE00:49A0:AE2C:8F44:F58D (talk) 14:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: WanderingMorpheme 01:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2023 

message: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Football_club_(association_football)
first word using "clubs" in titled section, must be linked to upper page (created last year!?) 93.140.44.36 (talk) 18:49, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intl. competitions 

message: — Assignment last updated by ADeng102 (talk) 18:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English 102 Section 5

message: A reader coming in with no knowledge of football will have no idea what goalposts or crossbars are, or which person in the photo is the goalkeeper—and the current caption makes no attempt to explain any of that (or in the case of crossbars, even show it). On the other hand, I would imagine most people already know what a net is, which will help them understand the ultimate purpose of the game. 2603:8001:4542:28FB:A51C:FA7A:6445:53B1 (talk) 23:15, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: DrowssapSMM 19:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2024
Talk:St. Helena AVA

message: Some of these deserve their own articles:--Kharker 21:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wineries in St. Helena AVA
Talk:Mass spectrometry imaging

message: The definition seems to exclude SIMS imaging, which is mass spectrometry imaging, but not limited to biomolecules. --Kkmurray 03:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: Hi! I added 2 MALDI images to the commons and on the MALDI imaging article. Feel free to take a look and see about maybe adding them to the article.
Tmyers14 (talk) 14:27, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mas.20124/full  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbirni1 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You can use this tool -  - to turn DOIs into citations. --Kkmurray (talk) 03:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: As someone new to this subject, I'm slightly confused about the terminology. At the top of the article, the abbreviation used is MSI, but later on there are references to IMS. Are these two terms interchangeable? Is one used more often than the other? Does the I in IMS stand for imaging, or ion? If the two terms are synonymous, it would be really helpful to have something along the lines of "also referred to as..." in the first sentence; on the other hand, if there are differences in usage I think it would be good to explain this. Thanks! (Edit - I found this note in Mass Spectrometry: A Textbook by J. Gross (p. 544), which explains the source of my confusion: "The term imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) is correlated to the same acronym as ion mobility spectrometry..., thus one must be aware of the context in which IMS is being used.") 130.159.177.98 (talk) 11:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:First inaugural address of Ronald Reagan

message: Just a quick note: The bot's message is inaccurate. Happyme22 03:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: October 2007

message: Why is this article here? How is this inaugural address especially noteworthy? 
JasonCNJ (talk) 01:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Reagan introduced what he planned to accomplish during his administration in this speech. And, like his Berlin Wall speech, the Inaugural address of John F. Kennedy, and all of FDR's inaugural addresses, they are renowned in American history (and with the Berlin wall one, world renowned). Happyme22 (talk) 01:04, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I disagree that Reagan's first inaugural address is "renowned in American history."  Certainly, it is not close to the other speeches mentioned, or frankly to a number of other more famous Reagan addresses.  These articles which are basically the full text of a speech (including the JFK entry) should be moved to wikisource.  JCO312 (talk) 15:09, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Happyme22, I'm eager to hear your thoughts on this so I can get try to get a consensus before taking any action. Would you oppose moving this article to wikisource? JasonCNJ (talk) 23:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No I'm not opposed and now feel that it is the best thing to do, however I would only move the text of the speech itself and keep this page which I am now going to expand so it includes notable excerpts, history of it, etc. If you are willing to move it, please be my guest. Happyme22 (talk) 00:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with Happyme22, the text of the speech should be at wikisource but this speech is historically significant. Some people forget the monumental felling of change that Mr. Reagan brought when he was elected in 1980. This was before Iran-Contra or other problems that would later beset Mr. Reagan's presidency. The mood of the nation was grim in 1980 and his election was, too many, an invigorating spirit. This address (like that of JFK in 1960) was very inspiring to those who heard it then and to many who read it now.  --Ian Struan (talk) 04:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. In fact, the text of the speech is already on Wikisource so I'm going to pick out a few notbale passages and delete the full thing in the upcoming days. Happyme22 (talk) 04:17, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article
Talk:O'Donoghue of the Glens

message: What you have added this time is beautifully written! Thank you for coming through. It is not at all contentious. Now that you have the traditional story there I see nothing wrong with the addition of your alternative theory in a section of moderate size at the bottom. Simply concede that it is new and one possible but popular interpretation of the Y-DNA results. I don't want the other lineages to be extinct either and hope to see a paper on the possibilities some day.
I still hope to see O'Donoghue Mor appear because I might have a little to contribute. DinDraithou (talk) 16:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beautiful!
Talk:Catalyst Game Labs

message: So apparently Loren L. Coleman embezzeled three quarters of a billion dollars and they've now lost publication rights for Cthulhutech and Eclipse Phase. Anyone doing a write-up for this? 75.173.87.166 (talk) 02:22, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not planning on it, since there's no proof, just some allegations. I mean, what would you cite? A forum post? --Scaletail (talk) 14:16, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The loss of the rights to Eclipse Phase has been announced on the Eclipse Phase Blog as well as the catalyst games website.  174.126.32.82 (talk) 20:13, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Embezzlement
Talk:Federated Commonwealth

message: I think this goes against Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction. On the page it says "When an article is created, the subject's real-world notability should be established according to the general notability guideline by including independent reliable secondary sources—this will also ensure that there is enough source material for the article to be comprehensive and factually accurate."
This article doesn't do that. DaffyBridge (talk) 20:45, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Universe
Talk:Shaun Gallagher

message: …associated with Prof Gallagher, and therefore non-independent?  The vast tracts of unsourced material regarding occupational history, appointments, awards, etc., and the dedication of these contributors to the same subjects as Gallagher—e.g., note coincident material and appearance of Interaction Theory article, and of sections in this bio—and the lack of critical perspective, makes one wonder if this article is merely an extension of the Professor's university webpage material.  71.239.87.100 (talk) 12:43, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I have no connection to Gallagher, but I have followed his work and I did live in the same city as him. I have no connection to User:Prenoetic. My edits involved adding him to the categories University of Memphis faculty, phenomenologists, and schizophrenia researchers.--Beneficii (talk) 16:57, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are Prenoetic and Beneficii
Talk:Stags Leap District AVA

message: Some of these deserve their own articles:--Kharker 21:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wineries in Stags Leap District AVA
Talk:Kiwiburger

message: Boiled egg?, I thought the egg was fried. Trumpy 04:07, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Captain Michalis

message: The 'Captain Michalis' book was actually never translated into Russian, and both the book cover published on this page and the information about 'Captan Michalis' printed in USSR are clearly in Ukrainian. Also, I own this book in the edition mentioned. --Kostyantyn Fedorenko, 10:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Language

message: I temporarily remove the wikify tag, as there is really not much to wikify. I however add the expert|portal-literature tag, to recruit editors who are more familiar with this topic. 
I checked and there are no links to the U.S. or British translated title --Gerogia 04:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikify tag 

message: ..is 'Captain Michael (Freedom or Death)', something like having 'Captain Michael' as the main title and Freedom or Death as a sub-title found in the second page. fs 23:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IIRC the title in the Greek version I have.. 
Talk:Mendocino AVA

message: I can't help wondering if the author of this article has confused Mendocino County with the Mendocino AVA.  My reading of the CFR indicates that the AVA is significantly smaller than the county.
Stepheng3 (talk) 18:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Both Mendocino AVA and Mendocino County are acceptable wine appellations of origin.  This article should focus on Mendocino AVA, but there's no reason we couldn't also have a Mendocino County wine article (similar to the Sonoma County wine and Napa County wine articles) as well.--Kharker (talk) 23:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  confusion? 
Talk:Yunqi Zhuhong

message: Name is often written with the charcter 袾 instead of 祩 (for example 総合仏教大辞典 法蔵館 2005, page 665). The pronunciation should be correspondingly Zhū Hóng for 袾宏.　see also 日本大百科全書（ニッポニカ）: 袾宏 岩波 世界人名大辞典: 雲棲袾宏 世界大百科事典: 雲棲袾宏
This article is ongoing. Be patient. --Iwanafish 04:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have made a number of updates to this article to attempt to provide a more balanced view of Yunqi Zhuhong (including his name).  The existing article had an overtly pro-Catholic tone without exploring any of Zhuhong's contributions to the Pure Land tradition, in addition to "weasel words", etc.
* Name changed from "Zhu Hong" to "Yunqi Zhuhong" to more closely match how he is specified in Chinese-language sources.
* I broke out his writings into to preserve the Catholic opposition (of which I have no source of information), and his Pure Land Buddhist writings based on a newer book on Chinese Buddhism by Charles B. Jones titled Chinese Pure Land Buddhism: Understanding a Tradition of Practice.
* I changed "Anti-Catholic" to "Catholic Opposition" to avoid potential weasel words.
This article still needs more updates and more sources, due to the importance of Zhuhong to Ming-Dynasty religious discourse, but this is a start.
--Ph0kin (talk) 22:00, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates to Article

message: The article in earlier drafts tended to fixate on Yunqi Zhuhong's rebuttal of Catholicism, but the language was inflammatory and lacked an inline citations.  I tried to find any citations, but it turns out that Zhuhong wrote comparatively little about Catholicism and Matto Ricci.  Given the quality of the text, I decided to rewrite the content to something that sounded more neutral and tried to cite what Catholic sources I could.  The back-and-forth between the Jesuits and Chinese Buddhists at the time is historically important, but I felt the article as written gave undue weight to Zhuhong while making some uncited correlations to other, more staunchly anti-Catholic figures at the time.  So, this section has almost been entirely rewritten and intended to balance out Zhuhong's other writings and work.  I take the blame for any flaws contained therein. --Ph0kin (talk) 17:52, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Tried...
Talk:Catholic Media Network

message: Add tone tag. The profile sounds like marketing material from the radio station. Therefore, I have some doubt about its neutrality. --Gerogia 04:21, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone Tag
Talk:Joseph Bailey (author)

message: ----
This is a published author of numerous books, all available through major brick and mortar and online booksellers.   Because it is a specialized area, online reviews appear not to have caught up with print sources, still being researched.  I don't think this one qualifies for immediate deletion on grounds of notability.Bsteph1 04:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Atlantic Coast Line Depot

message: Unaware of this article, I created Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Depot as a disambiguation page for the several NRHP-listed places with that name, or very close to it.  DanTD directs my attention here, suggesting the new one should be merged into this list, "Atlantic Coast Line Depot".  Actually, I think this article looks like a list-article attempting to list all stations of the Atlantic Coast Line Depot.  This article seems not to be a disambiguation page, currently, or it is badly out of format per guidelines for disambiguation pages (mostly covered in wp:MOSDAB ).  I think it would be best to remove the claims that this is a dab page, and develop it as a list-article instead.  Note, it includes numerous places that are not named approximately "Atlantic Coast Line Depot", and it includes numerous items that are not currently separate articles and are not likely to become separate articles.  Disambig pages are to help readers navigate among current (and sometimes future) wikipedia articles.  If it is desired that this be kept as a disambiguation page, then it would be appropriate to delete almost all of it.
So, I think we should rename this as "List of Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Stations" or similar, and keep/expand the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Depot disambiguation page (and reference this list-article from there).  Comments? doncram (talk) 03:11, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I can support a merger in either direction. I know the article looks more like a list than a dab, but there are so many stations that have similar and identical names that I thought the dab category was more appropriate. ----DanTD (talk) 14:55, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: List-article or dab or what

message: This article, as it existed in July 2019 contained the  template but was not a disambiguation page. The list includes many (all?) stations or depots on the ACL. A disambiguation page would list only stations called "Atlantic Coast Line Depot". There is now a disambiguation page at Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Depot; Atlantic Coast Line Depot (disambiguation) redirects there, and a hatnote on this page includes the redirect link. The current list article is, no doubt, in need of additional clean up, but rail stations are not an area of my expertise. Cnilep (talk) 07:38, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a DAB
Talk:Seaboard Air Line Depot

message: This article does not conform to the criteria for a disambiguation page. Should it be a set index article? Should it be a list article, similar to List of Old Colony Railroad stations? - Donald Albury 18:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a list of train stations to me. Some don't have Seaboard Air Line Depot in the name so it doesn't seem to be a set index article. CMD (talk) 00:30, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: What kind of article should this be?
Talk:Balador

message: I believe this should be merged into Beastlands, with that article being seriously cleaned up. This page would serve as a redirect to the specific section discussion Balador's domain. Balador deserves a seperate entry in a D&D specific wiki (maybe Planescape or what not), but I think it is too out of context to have a seperat entry on wikipedia. Turlo Lomon 10:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Discussion
Talk:Complete Mage

message: Do we really need this article?  I like Complete Mage and all, but there is not enough here.  Maybe merge to D&D 3.5 Sourcebooks or something like that? Web Warlock (talk) 16:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the article needs work, not merging. -Drilnoth (talk) 14:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. :) –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:20, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ???
Talk:Faiths and Pantheons

message: This article seems to hold less information than the externally linked advertisement page about it form the publisher. Someone with this book should add more content if this article is really that important and not something that should be merged to a list where many of the supplemental books would serve as a larger article to show how extensive the number of books are. shadzar-talk 18:45, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  clean up?
Talk:Meter Made

message: In the scene where Francine talks to her sister on the phone, the cobversation is in a way that makes fun of how her sister suddenly crops up. But although they apparently make fun of "plot hooks" and new characters appearing sudedenly in soaps, Francine's sister IS actually mentioned before: in season2 epiosde 4, where Stan wants to set up the (gay) news anchors with Francine's sister Gwen.
78.51.74.65 23:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, if I'm remembering correctly, the joke is as much about how artificial and forced the telephone dialog is because of the need to let the audience know who Francine is talking to, like referring to her sister as "sis" even though they both know they're sisters. I believe the line was "clunky and expositional". Stan later has a similar phone conversion with his never-before-seen step-brother, that is, if I am remembering correctly.172.191.0.170 (talk) 04:57, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

message: I think I saw her in the group of people horrified after the internal affairs guy leaves. Can anyone verify this? C. Pineda (クリス) 04:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Meg from Family Guy

message: Why?Superbowlbound 18:25, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know...and yet they have a page for every second-rate simpsons episode. Smarkflea (talk) 02:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

text: The information you added was unsourced. You need information from a reliable source to establish that Turlington is an -intentional- parody. Also, wikilinks aren't considered sources. Doniago (talk) 13:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Are DVD commentaries considered reliable sources?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.191.0.170 (talk) 04:59, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Ghostwalk

message: Someone brought up an in this article at the Ghostwalk forum at The Piazza. The first sentence in the "Contents" section of the article said: "The central locale for the Ghostwalk setting is a city called Manifest, a mausoleum city built atop a geological feature known as the Well of Souls which leads the spirits of the departed on to the True Afterlife."
Pages 9, 12 and 113 confirm that the feature is known as the "Veil of Souls", although page 111 mentions a different feature, within the True Afterlife, called the "Well of Souls". I'm going to change this to "Veil of Souls". Big Mac (talk) 08:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! 73.168.15.161 (talk) 04:20, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's "Veil of Souls" not "Well of Souls" (although there is a "Well of Souls" on the other side of the True Afterlife 

message: There have been at least two occasions when anonymous editors have thought that "Puddnhead" was a mistake and have changed it to "Puddinghead". Puddinghead is a band and has no connection to the artist who worked on this and other WotC products.
I can not find a Puddnhead article, so I've put the name back without a Wikilink. I can confirm the name from page 2 of the book. I've also found the artist mentioned as an artist for other WotC products, but didn't find enough to start up an article. Big Mac (talk) 09:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please do not keep changing "Puddnhead" to "Puddinghead" - "Puddnhead" *is* correct 
Talk:Gods, Demi-Gods & Heroes

message: On 2 March 2020, the Gods, Demi-Gods & Heroes page and its complete edit history has been exported from here and imported at RPG Museum, a growing wiki on Fandom that intends to be a resource for all tabletop RPGs. RPG Museum is using this content under the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. -- Supermorff (talk) 20:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page exported to the RPG Museum
Talk:Germknödel

message: "filled with SPICY plum jam" IMO, though technically correct, this might be slightly misleading. I love to eat them and they really are SWEET.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/spicy also lists "having an agreeably pungent taste" but my first association of the word "spicy" is either being hot, like a "hot salsa" or "seasoned with or containing spice", which both are not the case for one of my favorite foods :-)
My suggestion would be "sweet plum jam", but I am not good with semantics and to me it fells like a pleonasm - so sorry for not being bold :-)
If anyone bolder is going to change that, please don't forget the main ingredients list on the right side
Stevemiller (talk) 02:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. I see that the main body is changed to use the word "spiced" instead of "spicy" which I think is much better. The ingredient list in the recipe infobox had not been updated, so I went ahead and did that. Very Fantastic Dude (talk) 20:17, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spicy? 

message: This article is in a category "Jewish cuisine" but the text makes no mention of any Jewish connection.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.215.197.42 (talk) 13:56, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish cuisine?