Talk:Woody Jenkins

message: ==Untitled==
I undid the change regarding the influx of African American voters.  The article may need some editing in this respect but removing the reference all together is not a good solution.  It is not un-factual that there was a very large influx of African American voters in Baton Rouge after Katrina.  The voter demographics continue to change and will be in flux for a number of years as candidates try to figure the new constituency.  Anothersliceofhistory (talk) 01:05, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem seems to be that there is irrelevant material here.  What do his colonial origins have to do with anything?  Much of this could be cut because of irrelevance.  It reads as the most glamorous biography, in the worst of southern romantic styles. Baronplantagenet 02:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

text: It's been added, removed, added, removed, added, rewriten, digested through a yak's bowel, and removed again. I'm personally somewhat neutral on it because I don't know enough about it to deem it's noteworthyness... perhaps I'll figure it out andaddit at some point. I once met David Duke... wonder what he would've done if I told him I was Jewish.--Dr who1975 (talk) 00:35, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

text: The story itself is old news, but I can understand why Jenkins wouldn't want his connection to David Duke becoming public knowledge. Simuliar to how he keeps his Amway business under wraps.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.80.65.3 (talk) 16:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Or his pro-David Duke days back at LSU for that matter. Has anyone ever checked out old copies of "The Reveille?" He wrote some stuff back then that would kill his career if it ever came out to public knowledge.
Does anyone know why when one searches for Woody Jenkins in the search bar, the incredibly biased old revision pops up? Hasn't that been fixed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.80.65.3 (talk) 22:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I undid the change regarding the influx of African American voters.  The article may need some editing in this respect but removing the reference all together is not a good solution.  It is not un-factual that there was a very large influx of African American voters in Baton Rouge after Katrina.  The voter demographics continue to change and will be in flux for a number of years as candidates try to figure the new constituency.  Anothersliceofhistory (talk) 01:05, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem seems to be that there is irrelevant material here.  What do his colonial origins have to do with anything?  Much of this could be cut because of irrelevance.  It reads as the most glamorous biography, in the worst of southern romantic styles. Baronplantagenet 02:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

text: It's been added, removed, added, removed, added, rewriten, digested through a yak's bowel, and removed again. I'm personally somewhat neutral on it because I don't know enough about it to deem it's noteworthyness... perhaps I'll figure it out andaddit at some point. I once met David Duke... wonder what he would've done if I told him I was Jewish.--Dr who1975 (talk) 00:35, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

text: The story itself is old news, but I can understand why Jenkins wouldn't want his connection to David Duke becoming public knowledge. Simuliar to how he keeps his Amway business under wraps.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.80.65.3 (talk) 16:51, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Or his pro-David Duke days back at LSU for that matter. Has anyone ever checked out old copies of "The Reveille?" He wrote some stuff back then that would kill his career if it ever came out to public knowledge.
Does anyone know why when one searches for Woody Jenkins in the search bar, the incredibly biased old revision pops up? Hasn't that been fixed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.80.65.3 (talk) 22:36, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Woody Jenkins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5hLUNchJy?url=http://www.legis.state.la.us/members/h1880-2008.pdf to http://www.legis.state.la.us/members/h1880-2008.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:28, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified