lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Transcarpathia (disambiguation)

message: Hope you don't mind that I've removed everything nonessential.  Disambiguation pages shouldn't include any encyclopedic content, but only enough information to let the reader identify the correct link to an article as quickly as possible.  Ideally, there would be no links pointing to disambiguation pages at all.
Does Carpatho-Ukraine belong here too?  —Michael Z. 2005-12-1 01:14 Z
:I find a little info at dab pages useful, but if the community sees it differently, so be it. I am not sure whether Carpatho-Ukraine belongs here. Probalbly it doesn't since it is never referred to as simply Transcarpathia. --Irpen 01:17, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Windows Vista/to do

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day.  See footnote
*Per WP:WIAFA, Images should have concise captions.See footnote
*Per WP:MOSNUM, please spell out source units of measurements in text; for example, "the Moon is 380,000 kilometres (240,000 mi) from Earth.See footnote
*Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:BTW, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006, but do not link January 2006.See footnote
*Please alphabetize the interlanguage links.See footnote
* article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail. 
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**While additive terms like “also”, “in addition”, “additionally”, “moreover”, and “furthermore” may sometimes be useful, overusing them when they aren't necessary can instead detract from the brilliancy of the article. This article has 47 additive terms, a bit too much.
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space inbetween. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a. See footnote
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, AZ t 18:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Banner

message: === Support ===
* Support. I started this merge proposal. :-) The item is not notable enough to have its own article. --Unforgettableid | Talk to me 01:34, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: * Support. I started this merge proposal. :-) The item is not notable enough to have its own article. --Unforgettableid | Talk to me 01:34, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Support 

message: * There is now another option which wasn't available when this merge was first proposed. Llanview now has it's own article so this should be merged with that.Dippit 13:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Option
Talk:List of web service protocols

message: How are these "markup languages"? I'd call them "protocols". —AdamAtlas 01:35, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

message: isn't gRPC missing in the list?
141.90.9.35 (talk) 08:57, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  gRPC
Talk:Ute Mountain

message: I prepared an article under this title offline, then found the article had been started in the meantime. I have taken a somewhat different approach to the subject. How can I propose my different approach and include the existing information? Shall I include my article in this discussion page? I can't find out how to contact the author.
Chris Foran 14:29, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Texas State Highway Beltway 8

message: I think it would be nice if a detailed article specifically about the Sam Houston Tollway was also created.  (Dustimagic 01:36, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sam Houston Tollway

message: ;Counterclockwise
*Beltway 8 begins on the main lanes at Jacinto Port Boulevard, just south of I-10 (East Freeway)  and follows them to the end; exits on I-10 for both the frontage roads and main lanes are signed as Beltway 8  
*Beltway 8 rejoins the main lanes where they begin before US 59 (Eastex Freeway)   
*Beltway 8 exits at Ella Boulevard (just past I-45) ; at I-45 the main lanes are signed as Beltway 8 CW and the tollway CCW 
*SH 249: only the frontage roads are Beltway 8
*US 290 (Northwest Freeway): only the frontage roads are Beltway 8
*I-10 (Katy Freeway): only the frontage roads are Beltway 8
*The exit just before US 59 (Southwest Freeway) is signed Beltway 8, probably just because that's the frontage road there 
*US 59 (Southwest Freeway): only the frontage roads are Beltway 8
*I-45 (Gulf Freeway): only the frontage roads are Beltway 8  
;Clockwise
Presumably enters the main lanes just before Ella Boulevard, and uses the main lanes to east of US 59 and again to past I-10; the rest is on the frontage roads
Presumably at US 290, the US 290 frontage roads are used for a bit. --NE2 02:49, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Exactly how does Beltway 8 go?

message: From what I can tell, this is the only State-maintained loop road in Texas that is called a Beltway.  Why is that?  It would be interesting to have that naming history in the article. Lbbzman (talk) 22:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Beltway and not Loop? 

message: I've fixed the old statement in the paragraph for "free sections" so that it no longer mentions the "current end of the freeway."  
I can't update the section on lane counts to account for the new section because I don't know what the lane count over there is, but someone needs to do that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LoveCowboy2024 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating page for new section 

message: 65mp/h = 107 km/h ??!?!!?!?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.249.37.133 (talk) 09:34, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  65mph are? 

message: Does Beltway 8 and other toll roads in TX have reciprical agreements with Fast Pass of FL? Can I pay my tolls with my Fast Pass tag?
Aconsr (talk) 01:26, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not yet. There have been discussions that may eventually lead to interoperability. -- Gridlock Joe (talk) 13:05, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reciprical Agreements
Talk:Logan Heights, San Diego

message: It makes sense to me to merge Barrio Logan, San Diego, California and Logan Heights, San Diego, California. They appear to be two names for the same place. A redirect would be sufficient. -Willmcw 23:48, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: sounds good.  I'll do it when I get home from work--Rockero 00:11, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Allied Gardens, San Diego, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 23:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Penleigh and Essendon Grammar School

message: Are we that hard up for alumni that we need to include David Tweed? He shouldn't even rate a mention - take him off the list.Walterswithin (talk) 08:21, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable alumni

message: Administrators, this page should be semi-protected because of persistent vandalism toward the 'notable alumni' section by students of this school. FenderTele 03:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the last month there have only been nine edits to the article and only two of those were vandalism. S-protecting under those circumstances would be preemptive and is not allowed under the protection policy. I have reblocked  for a month for his/her comments regarding Mr Jongen and I've warned and will block if necessary. That's about all we can do administratively at the moment. Sarah 06:30, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Okay, thanks for that. I'm going to extend the block on the school's IP and make it an anon only/account creation disabled block, so you guys can still edit with your accounts but they won't be able to edit anonymously anymore. I'll try to keep an eye on Tomsipro but feel free to let me know on my talk page if there's any problems. Sarah 12:21, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection

message: The article is no different than an advertisement for the school, "weasel words", emotive language etc... Very far off from being a reliable source of information.--Theworld2 08:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's probably because some of it is a copyright violation. I've just deleted two paragraphs I found had been copied from the school's website and we're going to have to go through and check the rest of the article. For whoever added that material, Wikipedia cannot accept material you have not written yourself. Please don't add material you've copied and pasted from other websites, books, articles, etc. Sarah 12:35, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wasn't Me!!- FenderTele
As a former student of the school, I can verify that the history of school section is mostly COPIED VERBATIM from a sheet often handed out to parents of students or prospective students. It is essentially an advertisement for the school. Should it be deleted? 124.150.105.81 (talk) 10:03, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Michael Tucker

message: I moved Michael Tucker to Michael Tucker (baseball player), since the actor is at least as well-known. This added move will avoid the bad redirect. MisfitToys 01:55, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Michael Tucker page now redirects to the dab, so it's not so bad. I still support the move, but it's not a big deal. Tedernst 07:29, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Separable state

message: Could someone write a better introduction for this article?  The current version is meaningless to a reader who lacks prior expertise in the subject. Durova 01:56, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Is the separability problem in quantum mechanics identical to the Grobner basis problem in algebraic geometry?  The idea is that the subspaces of the Segre embedding are linear subspaces, and Buchberger's algorithm is used to find those subspaces. Right? Or maybe I'm crazy. linas 21:32, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: linas, i think you might be referring application of projective algebraic geometry to find subspaces that are not completely entangled. i believe the result is that any subspace of a certain dimension would fail to be completely entangled. this is related to the range criterion. it is a necessary condition for separability, not sufficient. a problem that is equivalent to the separability problem is the classification of positive maps.  Mct mht 02:02, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serparability problem 

message: If a state is separable, does that mean than it can be written as a finite sum of projectors onto product states, or is it that this sum need not be finite as long as it converges?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.97.127.183 (talk) 21:37, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finite Sum 

message: I removed the following text, because it makes no sense (to me):
:A standard example of an (un-normalized) entangled state is
::
|\psi\rangle = \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} \in H \otimes H
:where H is the Hilbert space of dimension 2. 
Maybe there's something there, but its wildly out-of-context, and thus non-sensical. User:Linas (talk) 20:11, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: The article mentions this problem is NP-hard, but if I understand the concept of separability, a state can be shown separable by "factoring" it into a tensor product of simpler states and writing down the factors.  That would mean separability is in NP, so should the article say NP-complete instead of NP-hard?  I won't make the edit myself since I might be misunderstanding something. 173.228.123.121 (talk) 09:04, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  separability problem 

message: I meant to add some more information to this page, but then realised there's already plenty in Quantum entanglement. If there a specific reason why these are separate pages? How can we possibly talk about separability without talking about entanglement, and vice versa? Luca (talk) 09:28, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't this page be merged with "Quantum entanglement"
Template talk:Dates2

message: Don't you think this is a little anglo-centric? "Offence"? A Google Fight search proves that "Offense" is more commonly used, but that doesn't mean it's correct here. How about half the template is in commonwealth English, and the other half is in American English? -Mysekurity
This is not good for anon users how it mentions preferences, I don't believe not logged-in people have preference options. --WikiSlasher 11:17, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

message: :"If the article is about an American topic, use mm/dd/yy. If it is a British topic, use dd/mm/yy."
People throughout the world are bound to read about both American topics and British topics on Wikipedia, and should not be confused by these foreign date formats.  Besides, the format normally used here is neither of these, but to write them as e.g. 24 September 1979, which automatically adjusts to user preferences.
Ambiguous date formats don't belong anywhere on the WWW, except perhaps in instances where the reader has configured the website to use a particular format.  There may be instances where writing dates long-hand would take up more space than desired, but that doesn't alter the fact that you should use an unambiguous format such as 24 Sep 1979 or the international standard 1979-09-24. -- Smjg 15:17, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, I fell for the confusion somebody created by using "dd/mm/yy" and "mm/dd/yy" to mean formats that are neither.  I've now changed it to something that makes more sense. -- Smjg 15:26, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I disagree
Talk:Alex Cintrón

message: i need the biography of Ivan Cintron
who's ivan cinron?? Derrty2033 00:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In his infobox, shouldn't the Cubs be listed?  He may be a minor leaguer right now, but he's still a part of the Cubs organization. - Cubs Fan (talk) 15:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Journey Through the Past

message: Someone knowledgeable should just write the article themself. Even the plagerised article is not encyclopedic and needs a lot of tidying.
In contrast to the statement that no CD has ever been released of this record, I just got a CD  via Amazon. It is a paper booklet issued by lostdiamonds.com. It seems to be authentic, but I am not sure about that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eehmke (talk • contribs) 19:44, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Sumiyoshi-kai

message: What does "recieved the control of power" mean? 893 02:22, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: * Stop, Thief! Thank You. Why so little looting in Japan? It's not just about honesty., slate.com, March 16, 2011.--87.145.5.114 (talk) 12:07, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relief support after the latest Earthquake
Talk:Snide

message: Isn't Snide a weasel? I was always under the impression he was. That nose looks too big to be a fox's, at least. Agent CH 02:26, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Add Snide from Wikitionary.  99.181.135.177 (talk) 06:38, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already there.  Look around.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 13:44, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add [[wikt:Snide|Snide]] from [[Wikitionary]].
Talk:Steward

message: Data Steward should be recognized as well.
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmusky22 (talk • contribs) 20:47, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data Stewards 

message: I feel like the "crowd control" description might be a confusion with "usher." Is there an example of stewards performing crowd control? 99.145.186.17 (talk) 18:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that I'm aware of, and not in any dictionary definition or mentioned in the linked article, so I've removed it (as well as an unlinked entry). Clarityfiend (talk) 15:58, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crowd control?
Talk:Coins of the Newfoundland dollar

message: Considering the fact that Newfoundland is an island in the political entity of Newfoundland and Labrador , a better title for the article would probably be Coins of Newfoundland and Labrador. This page should probably be moved there. --Gurubrahma 16:20, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, we'll see about it. THNX :)  Joe I 22:53, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Oppose Yes it was 142 and that is the name on the coins, and that is what the name should be. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 02:19, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better title? 

message: Would there be any serious objection to converting this article into a list, with the intention of trying to get it to Feature List status? I propose this because I believe I can provide a complete type set of better than average images.--Godot13 (talk) 02:21, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conversion to list? 

message: Shouldn't the title be "Coins of Newfoundland"? This article also deals with pre-decimal tokens.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxime Laterreur (talk • contribs) 18:21, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Pseudoxanthoma elasticum

message: I have identified  and  as useful recent clinical reviews of PXE. The article could be greatly expanded with these recent papers. JFW | T@lk 22:17, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for improvement 

message: ABCC6 Heterozygotes can still get ocular and cardiac complications: http://archderm.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/full/144/3/301 JFW | T@lk 20:23, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uh oh 

message: There are new clinical trials showing good results, and hopefully these new treatments should be added since new treatment methodology is finding its way into types of genetic disorders like PXE.
Chmyr (talk) 20:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless the trials have been completed and the results reported, how can this information be verifiable? JFW | T@lk 20:24, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

text: The onus is on you to demonstrate that these new treatments have been published in peer-reviewed journals and supported by secondary sources. Just ramming boxes onto the article page is not a reasonable alternative. Please try to be reasonable. I have spent quite a lot of time on this article, and am quite happy to include novel approaches provided they have been sufficiently tested. Let me know when the results have been published, and I'm sure we can reach an agreement. JFW | T@lk 23:09, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

text: I spend about 100 hours a week working on PXE, for the past 13 years, including many peer reviewed papers.   I am PI or co-PI on 15 research projects on PXE.  Some of what is written under treatment is grossly wrong - PXE has no relation to diabetic retinopathy.  It is inappropriate to write unsubstantiated information about diseases - I will just have to hope that people visit PXE International as the authoritative source and do not depend on Wikipedia.  I gave up long ago trying to correct this entry. There are many inaccurate statements in it.  I wish I had never created this article.  Sharon F. Terry, founding Executive Director, PXE InternationalSfterry (talk) 02:38, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Treatment of PXE

message: This article was categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM. kilbad (talk) 05:36, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: An editor is trying to add information about this group, which has an amateuristic website at http://pxenape.org/ (content not updated since 2013). It has been removed a number of times because it does not seem to be an active organisation but I am happy to be persuaded to the contrary (with evidence of course). JFW | T@lk 15:31, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The National Association for Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum
Talk:Cerros

message: The present article (which it seems was created in a single text dump by an anon user) looks to me to be a likely copyvio - phrases such as "The mask on the bottom right contains hieroglyphics for yax" (when there is no corresponding img) seem a dead giveaway. I'm presently unable to locate the original source, however. Anyone else agree?--cjllw | TALK 00:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I looks like a text dump to me too. However in fairness, the phrase "the mask on the bottom right" can refer the bottom right side of the temple, rather than the location of a missing illustration. I left a message on the user talk page, though they seem not to have been active since November. I think at least a full rewrite of the article would be prudent. -- Infrogmation 01:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I"ve revised this text sufficiently enough, I think, to remove the concern about copyvio.  I reworded the previous text while incorporating info from Sharer (1994). -- Oaxaca dan 19:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible/likely copyvio
Talk:Circular Quay

message: Stong don't merge - I don't know who proposed this - you don't give me much time - I'm making a template for all the ferry wharves in Sydney (commuter ones anyway) to have a good record of entries of ferry wharves in Sydney. If this is merged it will stuff up all my formatting. This page will have all the ferry information which doesn't belong in the geographical area article, which can incorporate a lot more (stuff like the Toaster, Opera House, Overseas Passenger Terminal, the MCA, Customs House, etc.) Please don't merge. (JROBBO 14:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a week - and no one has even written a merge proposal. I'm removing this tag and leaving this article. (JROBBO 13:07, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: So, i just went in and removed most of the offending material. diffs Seems to be a vanity write up by a non-notable architect. The controversial East Circular development was indeed a significant period in the history, and I'm not saying that my new pared-back description is ideal (far from it), but it's better than the NPOV, poorly referenced, self promotional material. --Merbabu (talk) 00:12, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: Interseting pic of west circular quay with old Commissariat building before the MSB/MCA building. Free to upload and use on wikipedia if anyone has the time: https://archives.cityofsydney.nsw.gov.au/nodes/view/713793 --Merbabu (talk) 10:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures