Talk:Star Fox

message: Recently, A Link to the Past redirect the Nova bomb article to the Arwing article. I was thinking of reverting his changes. The nova bomb article has a lot of info in it and it has info about the Wolfen's and Landmaster's bomb use, not just the Arwing. Thoughts? Thunderbrand 15:31, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I merged it. Thunderbrand 21:44, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I couldn't respond quickly, but that's probably the best idea anyway. Robert 00:08, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nova bomb 

message: Per WP:EL, we should generally avoid too many fansite links. One or two is OK, though. Thunderbrand 16:19, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, though trouble arose on forums over which external links should be used, leading to fights over whether Arwing Landing was greater than Starfox Database, and vica versa, so I changed it from having one or the other to both. --Blinkstale 18:37, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Really, it has merely been hinted at.  There are no confirmations of development whatsoever.  A minor note saying that Miyamoto has expressed interest in a Wii title would be fine, but to put it under the official list of games in the series is a bit ridiculous. 199.126.137.209 05:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not "ridiculous". It came straight from him. Thunderbrand 14:18, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with "199.126.137.209", Miyamoto only suggested that the Wii-mote would be good for the next Star Fox game, he neither confirmed nor denied actual development of such a game; it's SPOnG who made the assessment that a Wii version is likely, which is an editorial comment, not proof. I think it should be mentioned, but doesn't deserve it's own entry in the list; perhaps a category for future games (confirmed and hinted) should be added. -- VederJuda 15:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, that is true. It has not been officially announced. I guess I'll make a small section about it. Thunderbrand 17:38, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think "rumoured" is a bit misleading as well.  Who says it's a "rumour"?  It just sounds like a possibility.  I'm not sure Wikipedia is really even supposed to deal with rumours like this, considering that as far as I know, no websites have actually reported it as a rumour (and even if they have, it still might not be noteworthy).  Maybe a headline of something like "series' future" would be more apt. 199.126.137.209 00:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Star Fox (Wii)

message: spong also says "a DS version of the SNES and N64 classic." that could be worth mentioning.
:Whoever you are, sign your posts. We already know this game to be Star Fox Command. dogman15 (talk) 19:40, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ds version of star fox and star fox 64 

message: :Image:N64 Star Fox 64.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:N64 Star Fox 64.jpg

message: I'm a bit confused as to why this is called "Star Fox (series)".  This makes someone think of a TV series.  Wouldn't "Star Fox (franchise)" or "Star Fox (video game)" or "Star Fox (video game franchise)" make more sense? Unschool (talk) 03:49, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would, but this is something that concerns all video game "series" articles; Star Fox is just following the usual trend. You might want to address the issue on the WikiProject Video Games talk page for a global change. Kariteh (talk) 08:35, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Well gosh, one of those won't work. Want to take a wild guess as to where "Star Fox (video game)" leads? dogman15 (talk) 08:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible move 

message: wasnt a star fox game planned for the xbox???--24.109.218.172 (talk) 21:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: All I remember was rampant speculation on what was going to happen to Star Fox Adventures after Microsoft bought Rare - ultimately Rare finished SFA for GameCube anyway (and they've also done GBA/DS games since). I seriously doubt Nintendo would have let SF games to be produced on any other platform, after all, it's their property, not Rare's.  --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 18:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Star Fox copyrights always belonged to Nintendo. Therefore, no matter how much had Microsoft taken out of Rare, they had absolutely no rights to release any game series which originally belonged to Nintendo. Besides, in a court rule, Rare decided to keep all the original characters they had originally created for their Nintendo 64 and GameCube games: Banjo-Kazooie, Conker, etc. whilst they sold all their original Kongs, plus the Dinosaur Planet characters to Nintendo since those characters now belong to the Donkey Kong and Star Fox universes respectively. Hope(N Forever) (talk) 16:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  star fox xbox 

message: From what I'm seeing, the title of the game is "StarFox" in Wiki. Why? Syphe D. Mar (talk) 23:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: From the looks of the logo, it should be StarFox. -- Stormwatch (talk) 04:15, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nintendo's site uses "Star Fox" consistently, so I assume that's official.--187.58.84.131 (talk) 22:34, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Fox vs. StarFox 

message: Hey! It showed Fox, Falco and WOLF in that picture of them in SSBB! I suggest it be removed, as Wolf is supposed to be a secret charcater!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.70.124.170 (talk) 18:54, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See Wikipedia:Content disclaimer and Wikipedia:Spoiler. Pagrashtak 19:28, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers? 

message: Reference Number 7 is broken.
THIS ONE: http://www.gamesradar.com/gb/wii/game/news/article.jsp?releaseId=20070125154649578007&articleId=20070125154649578007§ionId=1006
It's the interview with Takaya Imamura.
May I suggest replacing it with the offical web site?
http://www.nintendo.co.uk/NOE/en_GB/news/2007/interview_star_fox_command.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MrShowtime (talk • contribs) 14:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link 

message: The image :Image:N64starfox2.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:Image:Star Fox Adventures GCN Screenshot.jpg
*:Image:Scr 049.jpg
*:Image:SauriaSFA.jpg
*:      Image:SNES Star Fox.png
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:58, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:N64starfox2.jpg

message: Yes, believe it or not, the Arwing was used in Ocarina of Time to test the game's Z-Targeting feature, and the code for it remains in the game. It can only be accessed with a Gameshark or other game altering device though. Should we mention this?
Heres a video of the Arwing if you need proof/a source.
[]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.87.69.48 (talk) 04:15, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure this belongs in the Star Fox page, plus YouTube is not a considered reliable source. -sesuPRIME 15:42, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of the Arwing in Ocarina of Time? 

message: Well, is it? -sesuPRIME 15:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha... no. But no one cared to change it. It has been C worthy since about late 2007. I think it could be B class with a few more sources and images. RP9 (talk) 16:16, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this really start-class? 

message: http://sickr.wordpress.com/2009/08/26/nintendo-wii-star-fox-wii-set-to-be-unveiled-in-nintendo-power/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Devanwolf (talk • contribs) 18:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be awesome, but it is only rumour right now. RP9 (talk) 20:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  new star fox game 

message: I mean really, chairs? Someone obviously spent way too much time formulating that wiki markup just to blank this page and made it about bogus chairs. They also turned Jigglypuff into a country (?!?) dogman15 (talk) 20:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chairs? 

message: Reading on System16, i saw on the Namco Triforce hardware it mentioned Star Fox as having an arcade game ported to it. (http://www.system16.com/hardware.php?id=545)
Silrox9 (talk) 11:44, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: UPDATE: Arcording to the MAME source it was planned but not released.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silrox9 (talk • contribs) 16:33, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arcade Game? 

message: In the games' timeline on the right, editor with IP 76.69.170.236 removed Dinosaur Planet and added "based on the cancelled Dinosaur Planet" to Star Fox Adventures. However, I have the feeling that only "bas" can be seen on most computer monitors. My screen in 1024x768, and using Internet Explorer 8's zoom tool (at 75% and 50%), I think other screen resolutions fail to show the entire text as well. Is there a way this can be remedied? dogman15 (talk) 03:41, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical issues in article 

message: It currently leads to a 404 page. I believe it may need to be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.209.103.52 (talk) 22:05, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Citation numbers change often as other cites are added or removed. Which one is it? dogman15 (talk) 20:54, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference [13] 

message: Is it really verifiable for it to be released in 2011, it could be a launch title possibly for if the 3DS launches later this year. So should it really be on there at this time?
71.143.239.160 (talk) 02:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Fox 64 3D's Spot on the Timeline 

message: The only confirmed upcoming game is Star Fox 64 3D. I removed a sentence claiming three different games were in the works, all of which are rumors that have been debunked.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.112.255.97 (talk) 23:49, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming Games 

message: Think I got this one figured out. Yes, the Japanese title is ever so slightly different... and consistently so! Pretty much all Japanese material just slaps down a "STARFOX" (while pretty much any American material uses "Star Fox" instead). The problem is that I don't know whether or not it would be reasonable to use "StarFox" as nodded to in American branding and the eventual Japanese branding; personally, I think so.
Either way, at least we've got typographical consistency in multiple regions here, not like with the mess known as OutRun. That they chose to change it is a concern, but I get the feeling that "Star Fox" was a forced change that NoA stuck with anyway. Despatche (talk) 07:33, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Japanese title 

message: Hi. On March 5th 2016, I made an edit to this page in the "Star Fox 64" section in which I removed the statement that a player can unlock an option to play the multiplayer fighting mode on foot; I hastily removed said statement, having never experienced the mode myself, and I put this for the edit summary: "(→‎Star Fox 64: Very doubtful - please do not revert without giving a citation)". I don't know what mood I was in that day, but despite my edit being Good Faith, it was very hasty and foolish to be that BOLD like I did. I have since read in more than one place (including the Star Fox 64 article on Star Fox Wiki on Wikia--that wouldn't be a reliable source so I can't use that I don't think) that there is such a mode as that. I'm very sorry I said "very doubtful - please do not revert without giving a citation" as that was in haste and not thinking through things. Could we add the statement back in since there is in fact an on foot multiplayer mode? I don't know if there's a source we could use but if possible that would be helpful too. Thanks/Sorry, 63.248.183.82 (talk) 20:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiplayer on foot 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Star Fox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://egm.1up.com/do/feature?pager.offset=3&cId=3147448
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080419052418/http://www.next-gen.biz/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3313&Itemid=2 to http://www.next-gen.biz/features/ten-greatest-years-gaming
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120404113940/http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/786/786938p1.html to http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/786/786938p1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bacoon. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 18:31, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bacoon" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Zoness. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 23:19, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Zoness" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Honestly, why do we even still have this filed under "Canceled games"? There's no actual real proof of its existence and it comes from Lara Kate Dale, an insider with a very sketchy track record (she got literally every single thing wrong regarding the Switch's software lineup: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cxs0XohXcAQypsX.jpg).
It just feels weird and misleading to have what was at best a vague rumor listed with Star Fox VB and Star Fox arcade, games that we actually knew existed at one point only to get canceled. We may as well have "Star Fox Grand Prix" listed here as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.34.178.3 (talk) 11:11, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Star Fox Warriors"