lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Polish tribes

message: The list includes a number of tribes, which were or are not Polish. Despite that, the entry to that effect keeps getting removed 
sample: a number of tribes from Silesia, a territory, that was conquered by Poles by the year 1000 AD.
also the Pomeranian group
Pomeranians 
Kashubians 
Slovincians 
Kociewiacy 
Borowiacy 
:They spoke the same language and they had fortifications around them, but not between themselves, who were they if not Polish? Space Cadet 15:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Languages? This article about tribes, not languages. Mr. IP is right. Different tribes in article be exchanged (not only polish). Pomeranians and Silesian tribes (polish: plemiona śląskie) is not polish tribes. LUCPOL (talk) 19:37, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: LUCPOL's attempts to promote the concept of Silesian Tribes has been deleted on Polish Wikipedia by a vote of many neutral users and admins as Original Research. He himself is now banned for several months, among the reasons are highly POV edits in Silesia related articles. --Molobo (talk) 21:00, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Molobo also was banned in pl.wikipedia . My banned concerned personal attacks, not OR. So as always Molobo manipulates with facts. In pl.wikipedia was created article but this was OR, was created new article (new version + sources) but Wulfstan removed this article because need discussion. However this is en.wikipedia and this is important. LUCPOL (talk) 21:33, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List shows Polish tribes only, not other people
Talk:Comité Colbert

message: *Remove all the EL. Create list of companies associated with Comité Colbert and wikilink to articles (if possible) Done with the notable companies. spryde | talk
*SOURCES
*Less advert, more encyclopedia.
All of the above will take time so please don't prod or AFD this quickly :) spryde | talk 03:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential Crap Cleanup
Talk:Eastern chimpanzee

message: This article claims to be about the Eastern Chimpanzee, a subspecies of the common chimpanzee. but nearly all the content is about the common chimpanzee. It makes no mention of the eastern chimpanzee's range, or of any features that would distinguish one from subspecies of common chimpanzee. Could somebody please add that. —MiguelMunoz (talk) 05:17, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastern Chimp or Common Chimp
Talk:Evelyn Cheesman

message: Just wanted to flag up this significant article from Kew Science (Feb 2014) on the discovery of a herbarium specimen of a species of Dendrobium orchid which someone with more time than me might wish to incorporate into Evelyn Cheesman's article.  Parkywiki (talk) 01:38, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evelyn Cheesman's Blue Orchid discovery. 

message: This statement...
"The tree frog is interesting in that the herpetologist who described it, has used the masculine genitive ending 'i' instead of the feminine 'ae', showing an assumption that the collector must have been a man."
...might well be correct, but it seems to be speculation by the writer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.220.131 (talk) 03:53, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research ?
Talk:Naval fleet

message: could help. 24.155.222.25 (talk) 18:14, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe add a surname of fleet captain example? 

message: Things such as an average fleet size by amount of ships would be helpful, and then fleet size by country. Biglulu (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics 

message: Maybe a line or so about how it stems from latin "flottis" for the roman navy might give historical context to the development of understanding of this term? --176.199.184.48 (talk) 22:03, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology?
Talk:Flurbereinigung

message: Currently this article appears to imply that Flurbereinigung applies specifically to vineyards. The German article, however, indicates that the term is much more general and can be applied to similar types of arraignments in other agricultural settings.Ekem (talk) 01:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh. Unfortunately my sources (wine books and website) only deal with the vineyard aspect of the term and its influence on the German wine industry. If you have access to German language or other resources that talk about in the broader context, then by all means feel free to include it. :) AgneCheese/Wine 23:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I defined the term following the points as espoused in the German website,- as a beginning. Of course, later additions as Flurbereinigung affects other agricultural settings can be added to the article, but I do not enough about it to tackle this.Ekem (talk) 00:37, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: It does not only apply to vineyards
Talk:2008 NASCAR Sprint All-Star Race

message: Ok I have a problem with using Roman numerals to identify the all-star race, I don't see NASCAR doing this or any other site so why is Wikipedia doing it? Also the fact that the title of the page says "2008 Sprint All-Star Race" but the first sentence begins with "Sprint All-Star Race XXIV" just seems wrong.  Anyways...I think it would be better to refer to them by the year, unless this is officially how they are naming them now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by KaseyKahneFan (talk • contribs) 18:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Apparently its the Super Bowl now?
Talk:Audi S8

message: There appears to be no information from EuroNCAP about the sfaety rating of this car.
However, i have found this :http://autos.msn.com/research/vip/Reliability.aspx?year=2007&make=Audi&model=S8&trimid=103976
5 reviews only but all rate on average 9.8 and it got 5 stars in every area for reliability.
Thats's remarkable even for just a small amount of reviews from owners.
Thanks Jenova20 10:48, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Safety Equipment/Ratings

message: Production is stated as ending in 2002 for the S8 and there is no 2003 listed but I own a titled 2003 S8. There is also several other documented 2003 MY S8s. Can the year be changed to 2003?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.15.47.94 (talk) 04:00, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Model Year Problems
Talk:18-inch Mark 30 torpedo

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Bensci54 (talk) 18:00, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: 18" Mark 30 torpedo →  – Most similar articles appear to use "-inch". This one is using a quote mark, which is not the proper symbol for an inch. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 17:42, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Agree, current article naming is contrary to the Manual of Style and there's no good reason for an exception. GraemeLeggett (talk) 19:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 December 2023
Talk:Wawaset Park, Wilmington, Delaware

message: The Neighborhood external link doesn't provide any specific information and seems mostly commercial. Are people expected to search the site once there? Seems worth deleting but I defer to those Wikipedians more closely associated with Wilmington. Also, I have an ancestor whose Jan 1929 marriage notice refers to her post marriage residence as being in Wawaset, not Wawaset Park. Is Wawaset Park the preservation district name and not the original neighborhood name? Or just shorthand. I will be researching that further myself but I point it out here as food for thought. Pnoble805 (talk) 15:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neighborhood Link
Talk:Warsaw Citadel

message: :Category:Forts in Poland is itself a category within :Category:Buildings and structures in Warsaw. — Robert Greer (talk) 22:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Buildings and structures in Warsaw]] vs. [[:Category:Forts in Poland]] 

message: The list of Poles imprisoned and/or executed there up through World War I reads like a Who's Who of notable patriots and revolutionaries.
This is not really in wiki style... --K0zka (talk) 13:33, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who's Who of notable patriots
File talk:Navistar DT engine.jpg

message: Replaceability=No. There are very limited opportunities to create free images of this engine, especially fully exposed as in this image, as opposed to installed in a truck, as photos of this engine removed or not installed in a truck are rare. Also, this image provides much more clarity and detail than any photograph made of the engine in a truck or bus, where the engine would be obscured by hoses, tubes, wires, and vehicle structures, would be. Finally, a photo of the engine in a truck or bus would show significant dirt and weathering, further obscuring the technical and mechanical details.
This image is from the same source as images in International Durastar The company states in its FAQs http://www.internationaldelivers.com/site_layout/absolutefm/afmviewfaq.asp?faqid=7 that images may be used in a manner that is not detrimental to the company.--Lpimlott 04:16, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Halo: Combat Evolved/Archive 4

message: The following is the last line in the article: "Furthermore, Marvel Comics is scheduled to produce a limited-run Halo monthly comic starting in July, 2007."  It is September, so someone should confirm or deny this and update the article as such, shouldn't (s)he? Hydrokinetics12 22:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Article 

message: There are two instances of Publishers Weekly being spelled incorrectly here. There should not be an apostrophe.
KConWiki 23:18, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected. (Response to  request.) ●DanMS • Talk 06:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: PW apostrophe

message: See Wikipedia's disambig article Needle re:
</br>
"The Needler", a weapon used by the Covenant in Bungie's Halo: Combat Evolved</br>
Should there be a mention of The Needler in Halo: Combat Evolved?--User:Brenont 01:00, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We generally don't mention individual weapons in games, to avoid straying too close to game guide material. — TKD::Talk 02:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needler weapon 

message: I know Halo was not released in 2003 because I first played it in 2002, and I'm quite sure it was out months before I played it. Hayden120 06:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah me too. I bought an xbox with Halo in September 2002. Halo was not a new game when I bought it. I played it much earlier (March maybe?). James086Talk | Email 07:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. Research suggests that Halo was clearly a launch-day title in Australia on March 14, 2002. See, for example, . — TKD::Talk 15:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian Release Date 

message: Inside the upper part it contains "Game magazines have ranked Halo among the best[10] and most important[11] games of all time. For example, Edge gave Halo a full score of ten out of ten, only the fourth such designation in the magazine's 12-year history;[12] Nevertheless, Halo has its critics, and the game was tenth on GameSpy's "Top 25 Most Overrated Games of All Time"; one reviewer stated that the game "recycled the same areas over and over until you were bored to tears."[13]" I think that this should be moved down to it's own criticism section like other articles have?  Businessman332211 18:18, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Valid point. The lead should be more general. I'll try to see what I can do tonight (UTC-4), if no one beats me to it. — TKD::Talk 10:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. The lead should be in general terms, although I left the citations in for "best" and "important", since those are claims that are like to be (and have been) challenged. — TKD::Talk 05:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure Change
Talk:Albu Parish

message: Coordinates are incorrect (placed in Ukraine), and I don't know how to modify it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.95.123.148 (talk) 21:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Now they're fine. (50°=>59°) Flying Saucer (talk) 09:46, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:List of Major League Baseball doubles records

message: The citation  does not mention Gavvy Cravath hitting four doubles for the Philadelphia Phillies on June 23, 1919 against the Boston Braves. The correct page to source would be the box score , which says that Cravath had only one hit in the game; Baseball Reference agrees with this. I have therefore removed Cravath from this section and added Billy Werber instead, per Baseball Reference. --Jameboy (talk) 18:38, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Four Doubles by an Individual in One Game
Talk:Vic Fedeli

message: This was a legitimate article, created in June of 2006, about a legitimately encyclopedic politician. More recently, somebody from North Bay overwrote the existing article with a copy-paste from the city website. As the AFD discussion makes clear, the primary reason for deeming it delete-worthy was that it was a copyvio — the discussion contains no evidence that anybody noticed the fact there was actually a legitimate article sitting in the edit history. Bad followup edits to a previously valid article should be dealt with by reverting to the previous version, not by deleting the article entirely.
And neither did anybody ever add it to the Canada-related deletions page, which was supposed to be done to notify potentially interested parties that the article was under discussion.
At any rate, what I've restored here is the original, non-copyvio version of the article, and as the AFD was based primarily on a copyvio claim that is not applicable to the older version that I restored, this does not constitute a reposting of deleted material. Bearcat 04:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, OK, that must have been a misunderstanding. I've removed the tag. On second thoughts this person does seem to be a notable figure after all, actually.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 04:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it should go through with a proper AfD though explaining the circumstances? The last AfD didn't seem to get much attention.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 04:43, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that sounds like a good idea. Bearcat 06:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CSD

message: Fedeli (as of now) is still Leader of the Opposition. Ford can't hold that position without a seat. Ford MAY appoint someone else from his party to lead within the legislature, but since he hasn't done that yet, Fedeli still holds that title. RoyalObserver (talk) 03:18, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Leader of the Opposition & Doug Ford
Talk:6th Communication Battalion

message: Michael Grimm is included as a notable member of the unit. The Michael Grimm Wikipedia article states that he was a member of the unit with inclusion of a reference. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 11:39, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is noted that he has stated that he was a Marine, but what has come under scrutiny, especially Marines from the battalion, including myself, is that there is no record of him being in 6th Communications battalion. I have more than +10 years in the battalion and granted he came before me, no one, even those who have been in the battalion going on +20 years or have retired, don't even have a memory of him, not even on their rosters which they have investigated amongst themselves. This isn't just an isolated incident, the investigations that have been taken place conclude that he has issues with many of his claims, not only his Marine Corps times. I mean guessing by your name, you must be a fellow Marine, you don't have a problem of his dates of rank? How many times did he get busted down? And if so after so many times you will be processed out. Jonorza (talk) 12:57, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Michael Grimm (politician)|Michael Grimm]]
Talk:Sonicare

message: This is why I NEVER trust wiki articles. If you actually read the study in the "clinical research" section most of them is crap.
take reference 7.
The experiment is fundamentally flawed. The Oral B brush is clearly designed NOT to be effective if used in a traditional brushing back-and forth motion (ie.bass method) because of it's brush head shape, but to be with rotational-oscillation and hovering over each surface of the teeth. That's why when used in the off mode, it produced extremely low plaque removal scores, and when turned on, it worked as it was designed to, producing a statistically significant change. On the other hand, since the sonicare brush head is so similar to traditional brush head, the small n used in this study would not have the power to produce a statistically different result even if there were one. this article is clearly just a ploy by Proctor and Gamble, who owns Oral B, to attack sonicare.
I'm going to delete that sentence cause the research is ridiculously flawed. 
- student DDS
174.6.129.27 (talk) 22:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: critical appraisal - there lack of

message: Many users to cite the expense of brush heads. Before reverting my edits, Urban rose, please give a reason for the reverts. Otherwise you look like a wiki-nanny.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.140.22.70 (talk) 20:01, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Urban Roses reverts

message: I am hoping we can create an analysis of the various models of Sonicare, I mean Norelco Sonicare, toothbrushes as I would find this comparison helpful. I believe that while there are a variety of models offered the major difference is in the brushing program--the computer controlled brushing pattern.
--TMH (talk) 19:20, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Model Analysis 

message: The article should explain what is "sonic" about the toothbrush. DavidFarmbrough (talk) 01:04, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name/Sonic component 

message: If you look at just about any kind of computer component you will have an endless historical list.  This would be helpful to those that are trying to figure out a number of things including whether they are looking at a counterfeit product etc. 108.223.5.124 (talk) 03:34, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Since Wikipedia is not a directory, such a list would only be appropriate for this article if independent reliable sources cover each of these models individually. — Newslinger talk 10:20, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Model List
Talk:Codorus Navigation

message: I've been working on the whole system of Pennsylvania canals, of which the Codorus Canal is one of the smaller parts. I created a Pennsylvania Canal page a week or so ago; it has a complete list of the public and private canals in the state. My long-range goal is to write articles for each of the missing pieces. Some of the bigger pieces such as the Main Line of Public Works and the Pennsylvania Canal (Delaware Division) were already done by others, and I've done a couple of the missing bigger pieces like the Beaver and Erie Canal. The remaining pieces are admittedly smaller, but they are intended to complete the larger picture. I'm being careful to cite sources for any data that I include in these articles. Please add more details if you have reliable sources. Finetooth 04:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Page rationale
Talk:Economy of Virginia

message: bbffh♥  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.207.126.156 (talk) 23:54, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

message: It seems that some of the information in this article needs to be updated or removed. For example, the Gdp of Virginia and michegan are compared ursing numbers from the 2000s, which may not accurately represent the present situation MinimumViablePerson (talk) 18:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated information
Template talk:Saturn

message: I've trimmed the moon list, because that's why we have . I've reduced the list to be more like . So now, only the moons discovered without photographic aid are listed.
Question is, should Hyperion be removed, so as to make the list only large spheroidal moons? 132.205.44.5 05:01, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: moons
Talk:American Idol Parody Clip Show

message: Anybody got one? I saw Scrappy Doo on there but that's about it. I'm not recording anything to VHS or DVD so I don't have any immediate access. --Iwriteu 05:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here you go: an old man collapsing in his walker, Annie, The Hero Shield, Wooldoor's aborted fetus, Frog God, Larry the Tomato, Foxxy's smashed stereo, Super Nanny, Goofy, Pluto, the blonde woman Clara strangled, the dead trucker, the twelve-year-old girl and donkey, Thirsty the dog, Magneto, Spanky's son (whom he grinds up for sausage), stock footage of a rider being shot off his horse, the little boy Hero took away earlier in the episode, the squirrel Hero shot, Denzel Washington, the man Toot immolates, Live Action Cow, the old man from the farmhouse, Scrappy-Doo, Charlotte the babysitter, Colonel Sanders, and the old man from the nursing home.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondluxuryacht (talk • contribs) 02:47, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Dead Characters

message: It may be somewhat official. A link has been added to the main page, but go here for a post from the primary studio behind the Drawn Together production. --Iwriteu 05:23, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you see the date on that post? It's from March; it's old news. The network later decided to hold off on a decision.Raymondluxuryacht 05:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find a better one, be my guest. I Google'd a bit, but found no direct remarks from Silverstein on the show's future. --Iwriteu 05:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cancelled
Talk:Foote Field

message: Why does this article need to be "Wikified"? It seems to be properly formatted, and contains both internal and external links.  Greg Salter 05:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You have a good point, and I agree with you that this article seems wikified already.  I'll check with the WikiProject that is in charge of wikification and see if I can get either an answer as to why the tag is still here or approval to remove it.  Stay tuned... TFCforever (talk) 04:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the guidelines at WP:WWF, and this article has already been properly wikified.  Based on that, I removed the Wikify tag.TFCforever (talk) 04:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify?
Talk:Grand Duke Alexei Mikhailovich of Russia

message: The source cited says he's the only Russian Grand Duke to bear the name and patronymic of a Tsar, but even at the time of his birth, wouldn't Grand Duke Alexander Alexandrovich have already claimed this title, even with his own early death? Baby Alexander died before his father became Tsar, but both of them shared the name and patronymic of Alexander Alexandrovich. Bit confused by this claim. Piratesswoop (talk) 07:44, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "only Grand Duke to bear the name and patronymic of a Tsar" claim