lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Jelly Jam (album)

message: Album is from a notable band, but isn't independently notable (in my check for coverage, it seemed like Profit is the only album that might be justified in having a stand-alone article). Redirecting per WP:NALBUM. Skeletor3000 (talk) 01:12, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirecting to artist's main page
Talk:The King of Rock and Roll

message: Album seems to be named King of Rock and Roll, without the "The"... Caro7200 (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Secrets Keep You Sick

message: *...is the sophomore of..."  What does this mean in English, please?  I thought it was something to do with education. Deb 19:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lithuanian European Commissioner

message: Redirect form an article to Category seems dubious, can anyone comment on this?--Lokyz 19:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please create a stub or prod the article to see if there are no objections to delete this redirect (consider WP:RFD too).-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  19:59, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Twin (EP)

message: Yes, The Twin released some singles and some promo Eps. 
But not with that tracklisting. Somebody took probably the idea from the site cyberchameleon.com in the Lyrically Speaking section. The tracks that were not on Yum Yum were placed separately with a picture. 
Someone may think it is a record but it is not !
Most of the songs remain unreleased, even if they are well-shared between fans.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.122.2.82 (talk) 03:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This record simply DOES NOT EXIST !
Talk:The Very Best of Diana Krall

message: Although the liner notes indicate that Track 13 -- Heart of Saturday Night is from the '"The Girl in the Other Room" sessions,' it is NOT from the album -- check the link and it's not on the album.  Later down, it's listed as a "promotional single" not tied to an album. BlueIris2 (talk) 18:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track 13 -- Heart of Saturday Night
Talk:Karel Pavlík

message: The article, and many other internet sources, claim Pavlik and his soldiers fought the Germans on 14 March 1939. However, works on the occupation of Czechoslovakia, including on Wikipedia, state German troops entered the country on 15 March. What is correct here? 72.74.109.230 (talk) 23:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with dates
Talk:Jackson Free Press

message: JFP using its own wiki as source within its Wikipedia article is not within policy of Wikipedia. --  ALLSTAR  ECHO 05:31, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And good job finding a 3rd party source for Mississippi Free Press/Hazel Brannon Smith. --  ALLSTAR  ECHO 05:53, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Circulation figures should be in the Editor & Publisher International Year Book (Part 2). --Orange Mike  | Talk 16:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source work
Talk:Greater Armenia (state)

message: «Բարիքի Արքայություն»                                                                        Թագավորական  Արվեսի Գիտությունը'  "Թ9" Թագը, Համամարդկային  Գիտակցության   Գագաթնակետն է ԳԱԳ !!!!!!!!! GAGIK MATEVOSI MATEVOSYAN ARM EMPIRE ®
Джрвеж относится к тем местам, где сюрпризы преподносит не только гений человека, но и природа. Закавказье - один из центров происхождения культурных растений, и в горах вокруг Джрвежа до сих пор встречаются дикорастущие предки культурной пшеницы. Среди густой травы, окаймляющей древние крепостные стены, срываем несколько неприметных колосков - это та самая пшеница-прародительница (Triticum vulgaris), которая дала начало сотням сортов, возделываемых ныне. В этих местах работал академик Н. И. Вавилов, собирая свою знаменитую коллекцию культурных растений, хранящуюся в Институте растениеводства в Санкт-Петербурге.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.193.152.224 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I have removed this image from the page: . The description "Boundaries of the Greater Armenia as referred in 1919 by Armenian nationalists" is both misleading and POV, as well as being off-topic for this article. The map is actually titled "United Armenia" and there is no reference or reasoning given to attribute it to "Armenian nationalists". I doubt the validity of placing such images in what is a disambiguation page, especially since the same image is not in the Greater Armenia (political concept) article it purports to represent. Meowy 01:49, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: The usage of  is under discussion, see talk:Kingdom of Armenia (antiquity) -- 70.24.244.51 (talk) 07:48, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|Greater Armenia}}"

message: @NmWTfs85lXusaybq: what are you doing? Why "A455bcd9 isn't eligible for closing the merge proposal themselves"? WP:MERGECLOSE:  @P Aculeius recommended I merge.
And why did you write "which is clear against consensus" when there are 2 opposes (Avrand6 & KhndzorUtogh: who did not dare to answer or provide more details for their non sensical answer) vs 4 supports (P Aculeius, Caeciliusinhorto, Rager7 [changed their mind after discussion] + me)?! a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 08:45, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Even in the case that you consider that I cannot close, then reopen instead of closing with  Non-sense. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 08:47, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

text: OK, let's reopen it for further discussion. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 08:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why did you do this then? Why these disruptive edits? And isn't there a consensus already? a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 09:02, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Antisemitic Propaganda: an annotated bibliography and research guide

message: :A speeedy editor did not give me a chance to make my comment. I've written an extensive defense of the  herein, but it was not saved, and was wiped out when the mistake  was removed by him/her. I'll have to write a defense a bit later - as I have to go now ... Ludvikus 20:07, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to place Singerman numbers on the antisemitic items we have articles on. --Ludvikus 20:36, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I've substantially edited/improved the above. --Ludvikus 12:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Book]]s and [[Bibliography|Anotated bibliographies]] 

message: It is intended to list the Singerman items, by their number, on the article, in the appropriate spot, including the title, but not the copyrighted commentary. Ludvikus 06:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not delete the items in the list. This (article) is going to be just that: a List. --Ludvikus 00:35, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Singerman list]] 

message: The above is the place to go if you oppose deletion of the Singerman list. Robert Singerman, in his useful guide to the study of antisemitism, Antisemitic Propaganda, identified, by assigning a unique 4-digit number, all the important antisemitic tracts which had a significant impact on late modern Jewish history. In fact, practically every variation of "The Protocols" (not just 1st editions) is uniquely identified, and a paragraph-long anotation is given. So please give you support this important article on antisemitism. Ludvikus 04:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singerman list]] 

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 17:26, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC
Talk:Useless Trinkets: B-Sides, Soundtracks, Rarities and Unreleased 1996–2006

message: As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I have removed this link from professional reviews section. If any interested editor would like to examine the contents of the review I have linked to, and finds that it is beneficial to this Wikipedia page, please reinstate the link. Thank you. *Crawdaddy! (favorable) 2007Asst. Editor, Crawdaddy! FenderRhodesScholar | Talk 22:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Thanks. -Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:12, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review suggestion
Talk:Any Old Iron (song)

message: I recall this song being used in the late 60s, as a jingle for Brook Bond Dividend Tea emphasising the stamps. Una Stubbs was one of those featured. I particularly remember because she was listing a few of the gifts, including a pair of tights. At that point, she lifted her very long leg to show what they looked like. Quite interesting for a 13 yo boy, at the time. Anyone else recall that? surfingus (talk) 11:10, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Versions

message: Any Old Iron Lyrics:
Note that the line
"You look sexy from your head to your feet"
is wrong. The correct line is:
"You look dapper from your napper to your feet"
Napper is cockney slang for head.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.169.59.34 (talk) 07:46, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct - I've just changed it. Sexy? LOL 'Arry Boy (talk) 23:00, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics

message: Whoops, misdid the edit. Ignore that. Meant to revert to 82.28.234.117's version. Did it the long way, ignore my first edit. 68.41.145.24 (talk) 17:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  lyrics vandalism
Talk:We Sing of Only Blood or Love

message: Can anyone expand this article? It feels like a stub, even though it has an overly glowing and not very cited description of Dax. Anything about the critical or commercial reception, especially critical, would be appreciated. Thanks wikipeeps.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.92.244.192 (talk) 22:32, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Central apparatus room

message: Why should there be a GPS system in a CAR?
141.31.182.246 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 10:30, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: GPS receivers like the ones Leitch makes are housed in CARs to provide accurate, stable station time code, time of day etc and at times additional reference syncs are connected to it to avoid drift, providing time code to station clocks, playout media servers, and broadcast automation systems etc.
—IncidentFlux (talk) 16:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:HMS Bronington (M1115)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.nationalhistoricships.org.uk/register/130/hms-bronington. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Nigel Ish (talk) 05:17, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Is the expression "wooden walls" actually applied to these small minesweepers?  I only heard of it in relation major warships of the age of sail (eg HMS Victory), as "Britain's best bulwarks are her wooden walls." (Henry Green, 1773) Davidships (talk) 22:54, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Only colloquially, and not commonly. However, the vessels were constructed of wood and there are now none in service with the Royal Navy. 85.255.232.225 (talk) 06:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. So if only colloquially we should not use it here, unless attributed directly to a WP:RS? Davidships (talk) 00:26, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wooden walls
Talk:IPoE

message: Hi.  I don't think this page has sufficient context that it can be salvaged.  It seems to be comparing  something to PPP over Ethernet.  Perhaps it's talking about sending IP packets over ethernet the way you would on a LAN or in a corporation to PPP over Ethernet as a service model.  If so, enough context needs to be added that a reader can understand what is going on.  Even as someone quite familiar with IP and ethernet, I cannot follow.  Similarly, I don't understand how things like video on demand or IPTV interact with this at all; no context is provided.  I acknowledge that this may not be sufficiently clear for speedy deletion; if so, then something else needs to be done to the article.
--SamHartman 19:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Speedy Deletion

message: I can see the rationale, but not the need for, the redirect/merge.  Unfortunately, nobody bothered to merge any mention, reference or explanation of IPoE into the OSI page.  So I recreated this IPoE page, with one reference.  I would expect reasonable editors with more knowlege than I to expand this page rather than stupidly undo my work. 124.148.65.123 (talk) 06:20, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added more information, mainly to clarify that this does NOT refer to the general concept of transporting IP over Ethernet, which long antedates home broadband Internet access, but specifically refers to using that general mechanism, plus DHCP, to provide IP to subscribers in an access network, rather than inserting PPPoE in between IP and Ethernet in the protocol stack. Guy Harris (talk) 21:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yayyy!!!!  124.148.89.144 (talk) 10:45, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undoing the Redirect
Talk:Framycetin

message: Framycetin is an antibiotic useful primarily in infections involving aerobic bacteria. It is not active against fungi, viruses and most kinds of anaerobic bacteria. The drug affects enteric bacteria and other eubacteria. It is used as skin ointment and eye drops and ointment. The ophthalmic product finds major use for the prophylaxis of ocular infections following foreign body removal and is also used in treatment of bacterial blepharitis, bacterial conjunctivitis, corneal injuries, corneal ulcers and meibomianitis. A notable brand name is Soframycin and Soframycin Ophthalmic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.203.117 (talk) 10:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ascall mac Ragnaill

message: I'm puzzled by the following opposite characterisations of the Irish Annals as "objective" and contrasted with the "unreliable writings of Giraldus Cambrensis". In what sense and who made the judgement that the former is objective? Why is the latter dismissed as unreliable?
:Mojowiha (talk) 07:03, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair point. The annalistic records are much more likely to be correct than Geralds flowery account IMO, but as long as we haven't got secondary scholarly sources backing this those words are better left out. Finn Rindahl (talk) 07:49, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objectivity and bias in the sources 

message: I'm uncertain about the transcription of Ascall's name given below the manuscript image: the name is given as "Hasculphus", but from what I can see the image actually shows "Haschulfus"—I'm not a mediaeval palaeographer, so I may be missing a reason why it's transcribed that way? Gabrielbodard (talk) 07:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transcription of MS image
Talk:Joseph Carl Breil

message: ==Untitled==
The wording of that part of the article is wrong.  That's like saying Beethoven wrote for the Huntley-Brinkley Report on NBC-TV.  Breil didn't write for the radio show - the company simply used his music.  -- kosboot (talk) 12:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "wrote" for Amos and Andy? 

message: The wording of that part of the article is wrong.  That's like saying Beethoven wrote for the Huntley-Brinkley Report on NBC-TV.  Breil didn't write for the radio show - the company simply used his music.  -- kosboot (talk) 12:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Little Eaton

message: On the granite pillar at the park are you sure the name is "William Brown"? Chevin (talk) 09:27, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you'll find it is William Bland. My great uncle Chevin (talk) 09:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Great Hucklow

message: What is the meaning of this sentence from the first paragraph:
:" It has a population of about 100, including Foolow , Grindlow plus Little Hucklow and being measured at 427 in the 2011 Census."
Just what is the population of the parish of Great Hucklow? Has it absorbed any of the other parishes listed? If so when did the parish borders change?
--Oldontarian (talk) 14:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of Great Hucklow
Talk:List of fictional princesses

message: What precisely is the point of this article? -- Y not? 20:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To keep this list from overwhelming the original Princess article, supposedly, see that talk page.204.52.215.107 14:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I shall clean this article up, theres no real talk on the talk page so I'll take that as a sign to go ahead and begin the task. Ncboy2010 (talk) 17:14, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've actually decided to start over from scratch, choosing only 1-2 examples per medium to set an example for a better article. Ncboy2010 (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: There are some inclusions in the list of people from a (fictional) royal family that never received that title. I think we should refrain from including them. Each monarchy has different rules as to who can receive the princely title: in some cases it's only the crown heirs, in others is restricted to blood relatives, and some others are much more flexible in its use. For this reason, characters that no source identifies as princesses such as Eowyn (niece of a king), Neytiri (daughter of a tribal chieftain) or Nala (girlfriend of a king) should be excluded.--RR (talk) 13:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  N0-Princesses 

message: Some of these are duplications. For example, peach and princess toadstool are the same character. --User:26zhangi (talk) 20:18, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplications 

message: Only fictional princesses with their own Wikipedia articles should be included in this list. Thoughts? Wes sideman (talk) 14:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As no one has raised any objections to this in 3 weeks, I'll go ahead and start trimming. Wes sideman (talk) 14:33, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I immediately suggest we should undo the trimming. Any of the characters should NOT be trimmed out of the list. Reese3196 (talk) 17:11, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  You're not offering any rationale for this. Based on Wikipedia policy, I must observe that according to WP:NOT, we shouldn't have an indiscriminate list of fictional princesses. There needs to be a qualifier for inclusion. Wes sideman (talk) 15:39, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Shall I restore few of the princess characters that have been trimmed? Reese3196 (talk) 15:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, absolutely not. Most of the list is still a violation of WP:NOT. Wes sideman (talk) 15:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to keep list relevant
Talk:Naharin

message: Hi there, The Naharin article should be preserved. It contains a direct link to the kingdom of Mitanni that is easily accessible. Secondly, anyone who reads it would know right away that it is the Egyptian term for Mitanni. Other Near Eastern pages have disambigulation pages for the same subject: see Hittite. There should be at least one for Mitanni too. Thank You, Leoboudv 20:23, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A lot of people are under the impression that Mitanni and Naharin are precisely corrolated. They aren't. One is a state, the other is a geographical area with history independant of Mitanni. It doesn't deserve a delete, nor a redirect. As I have said before, I say again: this would be like deleting Anatolia because we have Turkey. They are not quite the same thing. Thanatosimii 04:20, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article makes the terms seem synonymous - "the Ancient Egyptian term for the kingdom of Mitanni". If Naharin means something else, that needs to be specified in the article. IansAwesomePizza (talk) 04:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Function of this page
Talk:Beyond Shadowgate

message: A sequel with the same name is coming out soon. We need disambiguation from this page for the main Shadowgate page to link to both. www.kickstarter.com/projects/zojoi/beyond-shadowgate 2600:1015:B104:B438:0:C:4DF:9801 (talk) 07:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation with upcoming sequel with same name
Category talk:British people of the Second Opium War

message: This category should be moved to British people of the Second Opium War. The name of the WP article - and the most widely known name for this war - is The Second Opium War. And, of course, France was a particpant in the war, so "Anglo-Chinese" is misleading and inaccurate. Pinkville 20:27, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category name
Category talk:People of the Second Opium War

message: This category should be moved to People of the Second Opium War. The name of the WP article - and the most widely known name for this war - is The Second Opium War. And, of course, France was a participant in the war, so "Anglo-Chinese" is misleading and inaccurate. Pinkville 20:28, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category name
Talk:List of radio stations in Nevada

message: KQLL 102.3 owned by Summit as well as KJUL 104.7  Dangnad (talk) 19:33, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Licensees shown in the list for both stations match what's on record with the FCC. List reflects licensees, not specifically owners. Mlaffs (talk) 17:54, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Not up to date
Talk:Frank Crowninshield

message: ; Description : The focus of the project would be articles relating to the Algonquin Round Table, including its members and their literary works. 
; Interested Wikipedians (please add your name)
# Otto4711 17:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algonquin Round Table proposal at [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals]], please vote!
Talk:Timeline of piracy

message: The reason why i added the years from 1620-1680 to the list is because the first half of the 17th  Century is the flowering time of the Barbary Pirates even if there is only one entry now (written by me) this should attract people that have some knowledge of Barbary Pirates.--Jóhann Heiðar Árnason (talk) 03:15, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Is it really necessary to have this many empty pages about dates? - Most of these articles are either red links or have 3 or 4 events within them that could easily be merged into one article. At the very least we should merge the articles into decades to make it more organised. I think I'll merge all the decades with red links into decades. If anyone has a very very important reason why we need individual years then please explain why here. Overall I think we should just merge everything into the piracy but I don't want to delete some potentially useful information so I'll leave it as is for now. -855376764 (talk) 12:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge everything into a list?