lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sime Darby

message: The article's tone contains a level of conjecture and information not based entirely on facts. Examples include:
* "Whilst this will make it one of the global leaders in palm oil origination" - this is more a forecast than a fact.
* Same goes for "Pulling from a combined experience of 400 years of three great legacies, Sime Darby is poised with the potential for more in the future". This statement is also somewhat judgemental.
Overall, the articles style, while informative, is more narrative than factual.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.139.57.29 (talk) 09:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have attempted to cut out all the colourful narrative so that the article is now factual. Note that the article had (incorrectly) stated that Harrision and Crossfield had changed its name to Golden Hope Plantations Berhad. The truth is that Harrison and Crossfield sold the plantations to Malaysian concerns and then renamed itself Elementis.  Dormskirk (talk) 20:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Comments 

message: While the "Sime Darby" brand and much of the physical property traces back to Sime, Darby and Co. Limited (based in London), this article is very confusing because it conflates that company with the modern Sime Darby Berhad created in 2007. I intend to reorganize this article accordingly. Brian Z (talk) 16:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sime Darby Berhad (2007) is not Sime, Darby and Co. Limited (1910)

message: I just removed the following from Golden Hope. It may be worth updating and incorporating some of this content here.
"In biodiesel industry, Golden Hope’s first biodiesel plant at Teluk Panglima Garang, Banting which is operated by its wholly owned subsidiary Rubiatec Sdn Bhd, has begun its maiden commercial production on June 24, 2006. Its second plant is located at East Estate, Carey Island has started operations in May 2007. This plant is a joint venture between Golden Hope and the Malaysian Palm Oil Board in which it uses MPOB’s technology. Golden Hope will build two other biodiesel plants, one in Bintulu, Sarawak and another at Unimills in The Netherlands. When all four plants are operational by early 2008, Golden Hope will be producing a total of 390,000 tonnes of biodiesel a year, all of which will be exported." Brian Z (talk) 17:21, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biofuel investment

message: I just removed the following from the "Controversies" section. While this information would be appropriate to include somewhere, that's not where it belongs (at least not without further explanation of their role in the controversy.
"Former Deputy Prime Minister of Malaysia, Tun Musa Hitam and former Chief Secretary of the Malaysian government Tan Sri Samsudin Osman, used to sit on its board. The CEO of Malaysian Palm Oil Council (MPOC), Tan Sri Datuk Dr Yusof Basiron, used to sit on the board of Sime Darby.
Helena Varkkey, The Haze Problem in Southeast Asia (Abingdon: Routledge, 2015), p. 82/83" --Dowcet (talk) 23:38, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individuals mentioned under "Controversies"
Talk:Simclar Group

message: While there is clear evidence for their asset stripping activities in Scotland, there are no citations to support the claims they did the same in the USA, or even that they had operations there.  The text of the paragraph is expressing an opinion rather than just stating the historical facts, so needs to be re-worded or removed. Jonbryce (talk) 11:03, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Activities
Talk:Energy drift

message: I'm not an MD person but this artefact seems thematically related to the flying ice cube problem in MD. Both are artefacts of numerical integration - one appears to violate conservation of energy and the other equipartition of energy. Would it be helpful to place each in the correspoding 'see also' section of the other page or would this just confuse matters? Eutactic (talk) 06:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't put it in the 'see also' but I might mention it in the text.  Updating now... 7daysahead (talk) 15:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this article make reference to the flying ice cube problem in MD?

message: I'm not sure if I understand why the time step should be three-fold smaller than the shortest period, rather than two-fold, which I get by analogy with parametric resonance.  Does anyone have any insights to help me understand this intuitively? Willow 16:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Factor of three vs. two?

message: I'm not quite convinced if the energy should be growing. I know from my experience that useually it falls down and drift is something like -0.00sth. 
See this article:
http://scitation.aip.org/getpdf/servlet/GetPDFServlet?filetype=pdf&id=JCPSA6000126000004046101000001&idtype=cvips&prog=normal
On 2nd page there is a nice plot of drifts.
Greetings
kassiel  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.10.60.55 (talk) 23:46, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is the energy actually growing?

message: I get what symplectic methods claim to do, but in practice they don't. The above claim simply isn't true. For context: Forward Euler method is a "1st-order symplectic method", Verlet method is "2nd-order symplectic method", etc. If you could take it to infinite order, then symplectic methods would actually conserve energy, but then forward Euler would also conserve energy if we take dt->0. 74.140.199.156 (talk) 06:50, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: "Energy drift is substantial for numerical integration schemes that are not symplectic"
Talk:Siltronic

message: Please note that the English text on Siltronic AG is outdated and does not represent a translation of the German text on Siltronic AG which is up-to-date. Could you please revise?
Thanks you.
Petra Müller
Head of IR & Communications
Siltronic AG
193.18.240.18 (talk) 10:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit 

message: Please note that Siltronic was 100% owned by Wacker Chemie AG. Siltronic is stock-listed since June 2015 and the majority of 58% is held by Wacker Chemie AG. 
Petra Müller
Director Investor Relations & Communications
Siltronic AG
(talk)
193.18.240.18 (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit 

message: * It is not known what changes are requested to be made. Please state your desired changes in the form of "Change x to y using z". 
 
	A verbatim description of the old text to be removed from the article (if any)
	A verbatim description of the new text to be added to the article (if any)
	A reference which verifies the requested change
Please change:
*The Sun's diameter is 25 miles.
to read as:
*The Sun's diameter is 864,337 miles.
using as a reference:
* 
Kindly open a new edit request at your earliest convenience when ready to proceed. 
Regards,  Spintendo  05:06, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 06-JUN-2019
Talk:Silicon Integrated Systems

message: what about their Vortex86 CPU branch they later sold to DM&P?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.52.139.169 (talk) 16:30, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vortex86 

message: There is also no mention of the SiS Xabre series  82.46.49.45 (talk) 15:45, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xabre 

message: These chips had a master VLB (ISA) bus which ran PCI bus as a low speed slave. Headache when "plug and play" standard requires PCI bus to be master and ISA (VLB) slave. AT&T used them in their short lived Globalyst brand. Worked OK with non-PnP OS like Windows 3.1 or OS2. Crashes Windows 95 or Linux. Shjacks45 (talk) 23:48, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  496/497 headaches 

message: Much like List of VIA chipsets and List of Intel chipsets, would it be a wise idea to split off the SiS chipsets into List of SiS chipsets? --danikayser84 ★ 22:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with splitting off the chipset lists into their own article. -- 23.24.255.177 (talk) 22:32, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split chipset list into own article?
Talk:Signature Records

message: I suspect we have more than two companies with the name "Signature Records", possibly 4? We need more info and to have this straightened out.  Was ownership of the name bought out by a larger label? Certainly the historic mid century label is an important topic, and should not be unilaterally removed as an anon has done. -- Infrogmation 23:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was able to reference the label up to 1960. I can't find confirmation of the marriages or the 2007 revival as of this date. DJLon (talk) 05:51, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I also added a 45 RPM label picture to the article; it's the smallest I could make it with my scanning software. If it's still too large could someone please make it the necessary size? DJLon (talk) 06:17, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Signal/One

message: If someone knows how to un-link this Talk page with Signal, please have at it. I can't fix it.  - LuckyLouie (talk) 23:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: More or less resolved. Apparently the use and placement of "/" in the title makes the wiki think this Talk page is a sub-page of Signal. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:22, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Signal]]
Talk:SigmaTel

message: This page is inconsistent with itself - it says that there is a SigmaTel chip in the iPod Shuffle at the top, but later claims that there is not a SigmaTel chip in the Shuffle.  Which is it?  208.66.211.217 04:26, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: SigmaTel chips are used in the Transcend T.sonic series as well.
--Rsrikanth05 16:47, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transcend T.sonic 

message: If anyone has knowledge of where one might obtain technical information, let us know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.78.42.15 (talk) 07:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone know where to get technical information on their products?
Talk:Siemens Communications

message: Would this article be better merged to Siemens Enterprise Communications? --DanielRigal (talk) 12:53, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Siel

message: There was also a model PX.  I have one in my possession which I am giving away today.  It was purchased second hand, so unfortunately I have absolutely no information about when it was made.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.100.71.178 (talk) 18:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Model PX 

message: Removed the link to that synclub page, as it bears no Siel content. 84.163.149.202 (talk) 18:58, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Telephone numbers in Serbia

message: As it is obvious that recent edits were made my sockpuppet, i would raise the question here is any user with real account should comment anything about it. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 14:57, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits by sockpuppet 

message: Informations on Kosovo are wrong. See ITU bulletin Dec. 2016 https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/opb/sp/T-SP-OB.1114-2016-OAS-PDF-E.pdf and and EU Statement Dec. 2016 https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/17303/eu-facilitated-belgrade-pristina-dialogue-implementation-arrangement-telecommunication_en
As long as there is not more reliable source proving me ITU or EU wrong, I`ll update this section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanaparts (talk • contribs) 19:31, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: What the heck is the problem here? First, you keep on inserting  and completely inappropriate  in an article devoted to telephone numbers. Per wikipedia:Summary style, the main article where this should be debated is Telephone numbers in Kosovo, and only summarized here very briefly, rather than forked in its entirety. I don't think that having the entire history in this article is appropriate. As for having the Albanian town names here as well, I can accept that, but we're edit-warring in an all-or nothing manner. No such user (talk) 09:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: We should not have both Albanian and Serbian, but only article names, as par guideline. No need for something like that in article about telephone, for Christ sake! --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 13:22, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually the guideline do not exclude having both names. See cities in switzerland. The point is that the cities have both names and for the sake of accuracy it should be stated like this. As for the history: OK, I made a mistake. However, the summary is wrong and does not include ITU bulletin statement or EU statement. Its just made up based on one sided sources. See ITU bulletin Dec. 2016 https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/opb/sp/T-SP-OB.1114-2016-OAS-PDF-E.pdf and and EU Statement Dec. 2016 https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/17303/eu-facilitated-belgrade-pristina-dialogue-implementation-arrangement-telecommunication_en
Amanaparts (talk) 19:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  KOSOVO
Talk:Siddeley-Deasy

message: I have corrected the name to "The Siddeley-Deasy Motor Car Company Limited".
This is the exact wording used in the minutes of the Extraordinary General Meetings
on 7 November and 2 December 1912 which appear on pages 245 and 243 of the company
minute book and believed to be the first written occurence of the name.
There is no such word as Motorcar.
Also I have removed H.H.P. Deasy's name from the key people in the infobox.
Captain Deasy was elected Chairman of the original Deasy company on 12 March 1906.
He resigned the Chair in May 1907 and as a director in the following March.
There are no further references to his name in the minute book hence no involvement
with the Siddeley-Deasy Company.
He is believed to have emigrated to Canada in 1912.
Peter Barnes
Librarian
Coventry Branch
Rolls-Royce Heritage Trust
Pmbarnes (talk) 08:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Company Name
Talk:Shubb

message: Might consider renaming this and moving it to Shubb capo. There's more about the capos produced by the company than about the company itself. --Djembayz (talk) 11:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible rename 
Talk:Shout! Studios

message: What happened to the Scream Factory Wikipedia page that used to be linked to this one? I miss seeing the list of Scream Factory releases over the years by the company. Said list is difficult to find online elsewhere. Mzimmerle (talk) 21:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey there, I too miss that list, luckily I managed to copy it and post it on my user page sandbox, I've also been updating it too, here is a link to it, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TVWolf/List_of_Scream_Factory_Releases , hope this helps TVWolf (talk) 01:38, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scream Factory  

message: Most recently, Shout! Factory has officially rebranded as Shout! Studios to celebrate it's 20th anniversary. I'm now suggest to changed the name as it was inteded. VernardoLau (talk) 08:23, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shout! Factory has renamed it's company name
Talk:Dépeçage

message: In Federalist systems, such as the United States or Australia, dépeçage is necessary when arbitrating or adjudicating tort cases which might be governed by multiple jurisdictions, and the choice of one's jurisdiction does not necessarily decide the applicable law.  For example, in 2018 the Stormy Daniels v Donald Trump case involved a choice between Texas law and New York law.  See also Tobinick v. Novella, 108 F. Supp. 3d 1299 (S.D.F.L. 2015).  A larger descripton of the process is available from Marc Randazza, civil rights lawyer and Presient of 1st Amendment Association, https://web.archive.org/web/20181211060608/https://www.popehat.com/2018/04/30/randazza-stormy-v-trump-anti-slapp-thru-depecage-motherfucker/
--38.145.144.111 (talk) 01:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference of Law in Federalist Systems
Talk:Shoprite (South Africa)

message: Did Raw ambush SmackDown live?  Emmanueledits404 (talk) 20:26, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWE 

message: It seems to me that too many of the references in the article are from Shoprite's own websites. I think they should be removed, and hopefully better sources found.Wayne Jayes (talk) 04:55, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self published sources 

message: P.C Engelbrecht recently announced the building of the additional 132 ShopRite stores across Africa from 2019. Snoiled (talk) 05:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional branches
Talk:Shop 'n Save (Pittsburgh)

message: Cookies Jackbanes (talk) 00:51, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Food
Talk:Shoe Carnival

message: I am a professional shoe retailer and thus in the loosest sense imaginable a competitor of Shoe Carnival. There are no Shoe Carnival stores in my region of the country (Pacific Northwest) nor do we consider their online presence to be measurable in our area of the country. I will be scrupulously fair in my coverage of this company, working from sources. Please contact me if you have any concerns. —Tim Davenport, Corvallis, OR  /// Carrite (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Pro forma COI declaration
Talk:Sho-Bud

message: Not a reliable source per Wikipedia's guidelines, but the following has a plethora of information. This can be used as a guide from which to then utilize searches in reliable sources to expand the article.
* The Steel Guitar Forum. Thread: the Steel Guitar Network - Field Guide to Sho-Bud Pedal Steel Guitars
– North America1000 11:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information
Talk:Tracing (law)

message: What style should this article be written in? Who should be the target readers? Should it be a general article on the law of tracing, or should it go a bit deeper than scratching the surface? According to reference #10, one of the editors seems to have abandoned explaining the distinction between tracing, claiming and following, as he/she deems it too technical. However, I am concerned that the coverage of this article is so superficial that it will not be helpful to anyone: laymen will not get any idea after reading it (in the very unlikely event that they actually bother to find out about the law); law students will not find it helpful either. Craddocktm (talk) 15:23, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Style
Talk:Intangible property

message: Removed from article: 
:[addedon20101027 by colbert2422: Libling, D. F. 1978: *The Concept of Property: Property in Intangibles,* The Law Quarterly Review, v. 94, Jan 1978, pp. 103–119. Cited for its applicability to copyright materials. With respect to copyright, he states: *Any expenditure of mental or physical effort, as a result of which there is created an entity, whether tangible or intangible, vests in the person who brought the entity into being, a proprietary right to the commercial exploitation of that entity, which right is separate and independent from the ownership of that entity.* Since the present work is derivative [  17 U.S.C. § 101 (1982)], there is a commitment to share payments among the originators of the source works. [  There are over 1,000 sources for the material in this volume - WHC]. See Plant 1934 for a comment on embodiments of ideas. California has a law on this relating to artistic works. See Section 14.1 of the model ordinance at the beginning of this volume PQOLVOL1 for a proposed application of this concept. nb the Alaska Permanent Fund creates a right to certain state revenues for every man,woman and child in that state. Is it tangible or not???]
-Stevertigo (t | c) 03:38, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed
Talk:Periodic boundary conditions

message: Way too specific. periodic boundary conditions are way more general than the specific applications of molecular dynamics simulations. Most of the text is irrelevant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.101.142.157 (talk) 19:18, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For something like MD, when looping through each particle, conventional wisdom is that any "if" statement is slow.  I don't know if this is still true on modern CPUs and with good compilers.  But, if you want to avoid an "if" statement, then here's an old trick:
"if" statement version:
  (loop over particles)
   if (x <  -xsize/2.0) x=x+xsize
   if (x >=  xsize/2.0) x=x-xsize
  (end loop)
version without "if" statements:
  (loop over particles)
   BC = xsize * f( x / xSize );
   x -= BC
  (end loop)
where f is a function defined such that f(x) = 1 if x > 1/2, f(x) = 0 if -1/2 < x < 1/2, and f(x) = -1 if x < -1/2 (with the assumption that the particle is never more than one box-length away).
Of course, if "f" is defined using an "if" statement, then there's no benefit, but if you have a clever implementation of f, using, e.g. bit-shifts, or a bit-mask, etc., then the code can see a real speed improvement. Lavaka (talk) 16:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  implementation trick 
Talk:Sharps Pixley

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20120221014631/http://www.sharpspixley.com/history/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: And also, more recently, from https://www.metalsdaily.com/about/. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed