Talk:October 1992 Turkish attack on Hakurk Camp

message: == Casualties ==
I see a Turkish source talking about casualties. Well that should be pointed out who declared them, as they could be work of propaganda (usual phenomenon in military conflicts). See example box in 2006 Lebanon War about Hezb Allah victims --TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But they have multiple contradicting sources there. As long as there is no dispute on numbers, I don't think we should show it as if there were disputes. What you did was adding OR, imo. Also a government's statement is quite reliable in real life and here (politician's opinion not necessarily), but it might a primary source, so we might need to be careful. We have too many "Turkey announced"s, as well. DenizTC 13:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: as long as only one side gives such info on the other, it should be noted for NPOV's sake. Well, the Turkish losses are self-disclosed they don't need such notification. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: NPOV does not dictate us to create opposing views. If something is not opposed, then it is not opposed. Also, like I said before, "Turkey announced"s are used excessively. DenizTC 16:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I see a Turkish source talking about casualties. Well that should be pointed out who declared them, as they could be work of propaganda (usual phenomenon in military conflicts). See example box in 2006 Lebanon War about Hezb Allah victims --TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:42, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But they have multiple contradicting sources there. As long as there is no dispute on numbers, I don't think we should show it as if there were disputes. What you did was adding OR, imo. Also a government's statement is quite reliable in real life and here (politician's opinion not necessarily), but it might a primary source, so we might need to be careful. We have too many "Turkey announced"s, as well. DenizTC 13:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: as long as only one side gives such info on the other, it should be noted for NPOV's sake. Well, the Turkish losses are self-disclosed they don't need such notification. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 20:02, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: NPOV does not dictate us to create opposing views. If something is not opposed, then it is not opposed. Also, like I said before, "Turkey announced"s are used excessively. DenizTC 16:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties 

message: An image used in this article, File:Tak Flag.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Tak Flag.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:11, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Tak Flag.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion