Talk:Civil service of the People's Republic of China

message: This article is clearly a mainland China-specific topic, but User:Huaiwei and User:SchmuckyTheCat has continuously removing it from :category:Mainland China.    — Instantnood June 30, 2005 11:28 (UTC)
:Your attempts to populate a disputed category is certainly a cayse for concern. Fresh out of an arbitration too. I suppose it bores you when people dont argue with you in wikipedia?--Huaiwei 30 June 2005 11:57 (UTC)
::Would you mind elaborating why this article should not be categorised to category:Mainland China, apart from your opinion that this category is disputed? Thanks in advance. — Instantnood June 30, 2005 15:00 (UTC)
:::Because the category of Mainland China is clearly disputed. Enough said.--Huaiwei 6 July 2005 09:59 (UTC)
::::Apart from your opinion that it is "clearly disputed", is there any other reason? — Instantnood July 6, 2005 10:29 (UTC)
:::::The page title says the PRC. You want more reasons?--Huaiwei 6 July 2005 10:59 (UTC)
::::::It is the civil service of the PRC, but it is only related to mainland China except the top ranks. Yes I'd love to know your rationale. — Instantnood July 6, 2005 11:13 (UTC)
::Note to other readers: Please note that I categorised the article because it is clearly mainland China-related. I did not do it intentionally to populate any category. It has nothing to do with any agenda, nor is there any agenda. — Instantnood June 30, 2005 15:02 (UTC)
:::This is a difficult sentence to read. How is it possible for someone to "populate a category" without "intentionally" doing so? You cant be in a state of unconsciousness, could you?--Huaiwei 6 July 2005 11:03 (UTC)
::::That was not done for the sake of populate any category. — Instantnood July 6, 2005 11:13 (UTC)
This article is outdated, China is now using 27 ranks, see corresponding article Chinese wiki. Shenhemu (talk) 09:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mainland China category

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Civil Service of the People's Republic of China. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150210181703/http://www.dangjian.cn/syjj/mtjj/201202/t20120223_518141_4.shtml to http://www.dangjian.cn/syjj/mtjj/201202/t20120223_518141_4.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:16, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have a question: In the table under "Levels and ranking system", it states that "Provincial-Ministerial level (省部级)" includes ranks 7-8. This seems to be based on a table inside the reference "China's Attempt to Professionalize Its Civil Service " (PDF). However in zh.wikipedia, and in "公务员职务与级别管理规定", it says this level includes rank 8-4. I think the latter is correct.36.227.111.44 (talk) 09:46, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Levels and ranks 

message: Please provide romanizations of level names, so that the terms be searchable in English-language sources. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:33, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Level names 

message: Hi all--I've been working on Draft:Cadre System of the Communist Party of China for a little while now, but I'm still struggling with how it relates to this article, and even if it should be a separate one at all. The civil service and cadre system overlap heavily, but clearly civil servant 公务员 and cadre 干部 are considered distinct in China. Broadly, the civil service positions are those usually filled by cadres, but cadres as an institution have existed since before the establishment of the PRC (being immensely important in revolutionary work and guerrilla command). Any insight or thoughts on whether or not I should just try to work the cadre stuff into the existing civil service article would be greatly appreciated. WhinyTheYounger (talk) 14:56, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil service v. cadre system