lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hassan Cissé

message: This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot.  I have performed a web search with the contents of :Shaykh hassan cisse, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://tijani.org/shaykh-hassan-cisse.  For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists.  If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 23:44, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Shaykh hassan cisse]]
Talk:Indianapolis Public Library

message: Does anyone have any photos of the central library before a large portion was torn down to build the expansion?  It was still under construction when I moved away (2003), so I have a lot of fond memories of that version.  I was only in the expansion once, the day after my mother's memorial.--Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 23:03, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Before the expansion
Talk:Athletics at the 1988 Summer Olympics – Men's hammer throw

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 19:05, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Honey Island Swamp monster

message: I'm not sure what the source is for what the local Cajuns call the Honey Island swamp monster, but I live in St. Tammany parish and I happen to be Cajun, I can tell you most of the people of Cajun descent in St. Tammany parish are like me, transplants from other parts of the state. St. Tammany is not part of the Acadian Triangle and has never been considered "Cajun Country". The article seems to suggest there is a long history of this supposed creature in local Cajun lore. I can assure you there is no local Cajun lore in St. Tammany.  Perhaps the editor was referring to similar stories from other parts of the state? --Kjrjr (talk) 23:30, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that 'local Cajuns' is vague. It would be helpful to have some solid sources for the origins of the term 'Tainted Keitre.' Likewise, the term 'Letiche' is attributed casually across the Web to Native Americans, but details are lacking. Joe Nickel wrote that 'Letiche' was part of Cajun foklore. See: "Tracking the Swamp Monsters" Alan G. Archer (talk) 09:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local Cajuns?
Talk:Van Gend & Loos

message: I can't believe that this page doesn't mention (except for the link on the top, which one easily misses) the landmark European Court of Justice ruling of 1963 which was triggered by an action brought by van Gend and laid the foundations for what is now the European Union. Shouldn't it be added to the body of the article? 163.1.51.71 (talk) 18:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ECJ ruling

message: I tried to find out what a "diligence company" is, and discovered that Wikipedia's disambiguation page on diligence refers to Dutch windmills, which is obviously not what it means on this page.  That's as far as I got.  What is it?  Does anybody know?  Unfree (talk) 06:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Diligence
Talk:Order of battle of the Battle of Long Island

message: Don't we typically title OrBat articles "(Battle) order of battle?" It seems to me that "Battle of Long Island order of Battle" would be less of a mouthful. —Ed!(talk) 06:35, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fairly certain the subject of naming order of battle articles has been discussed at WT:MILHIST, without reaching consensus. I'm mostly agnostic on the subject. Magic♪piano 13:28, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming convention
Talk:Expo 2012

message: As the Expo is currently being held, it would be useful for any inaccuracies to be corrected by those who have attended. Maybe it is best written in the past tense.--Soulparadox 04:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. Really, it's a blatant advertisement, and as the event is due to end just a week from this writing, I've tagged for update. Perhaps an objective account in the past tense after the event is over would be notable enough. I've removed the copy edit tag as it's not worth doing it for an article that needs a complete rewrite. --Stfg (talk) 16:17, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I found one cite to support the text based on a third party. Geraldshields11 (talk) 19:16, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy 
Talk:Conference for the Reduction and Limitation of Armaments

message: Isn't this a duplicate of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Disarmament_Conference?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.165.186.228 (talk) 09:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate article 

message: "As Gibson had observed not long after the London Conference..." Who exactly is "Gibson"? No first name is given, nor clarification as to who he is. No wikilink, assuming this (historian, journalist?) has a Wiki article, is attached to his name. Anybody already familiar with this particular Geneva Conference likely already knows who 'Gibson' is, and probably would have a reduced need to read this article, which merely summarizes the subject. But the simpletons like myself are completely oblivious to the significance of this guy.My request which would benefit others is that this 'Gibson' guy can 'grow' a first name (which he surely must have been given on the day he was born), a wikilink if he has an article, and perhaps a couple words to give context (is he a historian?). Thank you, 70.196.194.159 (talk) 09:55, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Mr.'Gibson' have a first name? 
Talk:Henry Byng, 4th Earl of Strafford

message: Was he related to either of the following Byngs?
* Admiral John Byng (1704–1757), a British admiral, shot by sentence of a court martial.
* Admiral George Byng, 1st Viscount Torrington,(1668 - 1733]]) the first of several Viscounts Torrington.--DThomsen8 (talk) 15:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relatives?
Talk:Passive margin

message: This page is a group project of an undergraduate geoscience course at UTexas at Dallas, GEOS 4320 Geophysics and geochemistry. Seven students did this instead of a term paper. Guidance by professors Ferguson and Stern was also provided.  feel free to comment, there will be more such contributions from UTD Geosciences, ideas welcome ~~zyzzy2
:Great, it's nice to see this article being expanded so well from its old stub status :).  While I'm not familiar enough with the subject to offer feedback or anything, you may want to look at Wikipedia:School and university projects for some info.  There you can add your project to the list of ongoing projects as well.  Thanks for your edits! Havocrazy 08:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page was identified as including a disambiguation error based on the term "Accommodation".
In order to resolve this problem I have removed the wikilink from the term as I am unable to determine, from the context, what the term is referring to.  If you wish to restore the link please ensure that the term and the link are fully resolved so that no further disambiguation occurs. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 05:25, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Accommodation" Disambiguation 

message: The Classification section contradicts itself, saying four perspectives in the first paragraph, which lists the four, and then says three in the second paragraph. - Dough34 (talk) 01:24, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three or four perspectives?
Talk:Bertilo Wennergren

message: A tag had been placed on this article requesting its speedy deletion from Wikipedia under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion (because of apparent failure to indicate how or why the subject was notable, i.e., why an article about that subject should be included.) I suggest that Bertilo Wennergren is notable not just because he is the subject of articles in the Esperanto and Swedish Wikipedias, but because he meets at least three criteria suggested for notability:
# The person has been the subject of a credible independent biography (Gramatikisto, rokisto aŭ perversulo?, by Sonja Kisa).
# The person has received significant recognized awards or honors (Esperantist of the Year for 2006)
# The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field (author of a 700-page scholarly reference grammar of Esperanto, Plena Manlibro de Esperanta Gramatiko -- a book which he is making freely available for download on the Internet) Objectivesea 00:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability of "Bertilo Wennergren" article
Talk:José Moura Gonçalves

message: I cleaned up the references posted with the wikipedia citation templates; however, they do not seem to be valid references for the scope of this article. Correct citations and referencing would be appreciated, but I will not mark this article as unreferenced for now. --Xentreos 00:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:National Radio and Television Administration

message: * Chinese: http://www.sarft.gov.cn/articles/2007/02/16/20070913144431120333.html
* English: http://en.cnci.gov.cn/Law/LawDetails.aspx?ID=6117
* Also in PDF format (Chinese and English) from WIPO: http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=6474
WhisperToMe (talk) 05:53, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie administration law

message: Someone should find out whether this government agency's name is officially translated to "State..." or "General..." The current situation with a link to "General..." in the introduction, which only leads back to this article, doesn't make much sense. As the agency's Chinese name starts with 国家, I think it should be translated to "State...", but Google hits say something different. 87.77.27.9 (talk) 02:04, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: On the agency's Web site, "State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television of the People's Republic of China" is written in English at the top. A recent Reuters story used the name "State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television". The name was recently changed following a merger of two agencies; the name that was chosen differs from the one that had been announced. I had updated the English name without updating the Chinese text or anything else. I've removed the circular link; thanks for finding that. —rybec 02:16, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of SAPPRFT / GAPPRFT
Talk:Jay Friedman

message: Sounds like someone who could possibly be notable. Placed the hangon on top of someone elses DB in order to give Kurt a chance to add more. AvruchTalk 00:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article was AfD'd some time ago (I have no idea why the link is not here). Since then, it has not been improved in any way. Rather than immediately AfD it again, I am going to ask what, if anything, people intend to do to improve this article (ie put in some reliable sources or other demonstrations of notability). --Cheeser1 (talk) 08:56, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: (1) Reliable sources are already present; (2) Notability is irrelevant; (3) The prior AfD wasn't a "no-consensus, defaults to keep" but a CLEAR consensus keep, so what the hell would make you think anything has changed? (4) That you think an article needs "improvement" is no reason to threaten to delete it--we're not on a deadline.  When--and if--I get around to it I might work on it, or others might come along in the future and do it themselves.  Why are you so eager to delete it?  Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 16:44, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Kurt, your incivility is intolerable. I will not engage in this discussion if you will not do so in good faith. Good day, sir. --Cheeser1 (talk) 16:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please show me this supposed "incivility".  Kurt Weber (Go Colts!) 17:06, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you deny it, I will ignore it and address your points: (1) No reliable independent sources given. One unreliable one, one non-independent one, neither of which constitutes significant coverage. (2) Notability is irrelevant? Since when? (3) The prior AfD was a "keep" on the basis and provision of future expansion. I'm not demolishing the house while it's being built. I'm asking you to take this stray 2 by 4 back to the store until such time as someone can build a house out with it. (4) I'm not even going to dignify this item with a response. --Cheeser1 (talk) 18:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, I would support the deletion of this article. Its a short one liner and in my opinion would fall under WP:BIO. Dustitalk to me 16:51, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Sheet

message: I haven't bothered to look at any of these entries closely yet, but at a glance none of them appear to be reasonable targets on a search for "sheet", per WP:Disambiguation#Lists. In other words, for example, if I'm looking for an article about spreadsheets I wouldn't navigate to "Sheet", I'd navigate to "Spreadsheet." My inclination (again, pending a closer look to make sure I'm not overlooking some things here that are actually referred to as just "sheet") is to cut out everything but the names. Propaniac 01:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is how it looked when I first saw it in August. — Athaenara  ✉  03:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Are any of these entries valid?
Category talk:Companies established in 1863

message: I'm looking for a furniture company by the name of Frank & Son INC, the address was 470 Park Ave. South New York City. The timeline was from 1863 to 1963. Can you be of assistance ? I have a rocking chair made by them with original tags still on it, with this information on them.
Selected Entity Name: FRANK & SON, INC.
Selected Entity Status Information
Current Entity Name:	FRANK & SON, INC.
DOS ID #:	21602
Initial DOS Filing Date:	DECEMBER 11, 1925
County:	NEW YORK
Jurisdiction:	NEW YORK
Entity Type:	DOMESTIC BUSINESS CORPORATION
Current Entity Status:	ACTIVE
Selected Entity Address Information
DOS Process (Address to which DOS will mail process if accepted on behalf of the entity)
FRANK & SON, INC.
180 SANDERSON DRIVE
CONWAY, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29526
Chief Executive Officer
GEORGE E SANDERSON
PO BOX 1252
CONWAY, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29526
Principal Executive Office
FRANK & SON, INC.
180 SANDERSON DR
CONWAY, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29526
Originally begun as Frank & Danziger in 1888, Frank & Son was incorporated in 1926.   From that time forward, Frank & Son, Inc has produced and sold furniture.  From 1926 until the late 1970's, we made furniture for sale to the retail furniture industry.  In the early 1980's, we began to focus on the Hospitality Industry, and produce a variety of furniture for this purpose.
Today, Frank & Sons Inc. serves the hospitality industry as well as college dorms, healthcare facilities, and other types of environments where guestrooms and public area hospitality furnishings are called for.  We have done work all over the continental US, as well as South America and the Caribbean Islands.
Our furnishings are designed with World Class standards in mind.  With fashion and elegance as our main focus, the furnishings are also designed to be strong and sturdy to hold up in hospitality environments.
 
We maintain good relationships with outstanding producers of carpet,wall textures, artwork, housewares and other vendors of furnishings to allow us to completely furnish new guestrooms and public areas, and to renovate and furnish hospitality settings as well.
Our design staff operates at a very high level to produce hospitality environments that invite guests to feel comfortable, secure, and within inviting surroundings while at the resort.  The goals are:
Outstanding Design
Comfort and Functionality
Durability and Timelessness
These elements will be custom designed to your color palette that will impress even the most discriminating vacationer.  The delivery and installation team will go the extra mile to make sure that your furnishings are correctly installed. http://www.frankandsoninc.com/AboutUs/tabid/81/Default.aspx
67.185.10.68 (talk) 23:22, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Daniel Flynn

message: ----
I've turned this into a redirect page after finding a whole tangle of "Dan/Daniel Flynn" links leading to the wrong Dan/Daniel Flynn. Not sure whether Dan Flynn should redirect or not; it's being incorrectly linked from pages on Daniel J. Flynn's books, but I'll fix the links and leave the page as is for now. - AdelaMae (t - c - wpn) 01:51, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:E. Bruce Heilman

message: He recently finished writing and autobiogrophy/memoirs of his life in three sections: Growing up in Kentucky, Military experience in the Marine Corps, and Higher Education. The book is due out in early 2008.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.143.186.64 (talk) 21:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memoirs
Talk:List of New Zealand state highways

message: Good to see this split out. Might be about time to start articles for SHs 2 to 8 soon... Grutness...wha? 01:16, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You might want to consider a sortable table like List of United States Numbered Highways. --NE2 04:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split - and individual articles?

message: This article seems to have inherited the unreferenced categories, and these are clearly not applicable. Does anyone know how to remove them? 
I guess it would be petty to bung a mergeto template on this page, but I do think this info belongs back in the original article.
dramatic (talk) 22:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you talking about? There's a citation needed tag in the notes for 1B. --NE2 04:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops - well we'll soon fix that - I searched but couldn't find a source for that statement so I've removed it. dramatic (talk) 21:24, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced Category 

message: Does anyone know if they are still yet to be de-established paper highways? Are there any sources relating to these? Ajf773 (talk) 10:14, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I gather by looking through various resources I can assume both these highways are no longer under state administration. Both stopped appearing in NZTA traffic volume resource booklets a couple of years ago. The only reference of any of them is SH 1D still appears on GoogleMaps (although that can be out of date). Neither highway appears on the more up-to-date NZTA official maps. If there are no objections within a week I'll move them off this page and into the former spurs section of New Zealand State Highway 1. Ajf773 (talk) 00:15, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  SH 1D and 1G 

message: I previously removed 1D and 1G (which are now mentioned on New Zealand State Highway 1).
Do we want to include other paper only highways (ie 1K, 20C) on this list article, in the individual state highway articles, or both? Ajf773 (talk) 05:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsigned highways 

message: Shields should be used because they look better and communicate information better. Similar articles use them e.g. List of road routes in Queensland
Life200BC (talk) 10:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shields
Talk:Imitation of sounds in shamanism

message: The original title of this article was “Imitation of natural sounds related to various shamanistic beliefs or practice”. The new title, “Onomatopoeia in Shamanism” is shorter, but the capital in “Shamanism” may be misleading. Several experts say shamanism is not religion (at least, not in the familiar sense), and anyway, there is no “one”, “the” shamanism, on the contrary, even the mere term is debated sometimes: there are many different, diverse cultures, and by some resemblances, some techniques and beliefs can be discussed together.
I propose
* to un-capitalize “Shamanism” in the title of the article
* maybe we could try to use the old-new term “shamanhood” (at least in the title), the term proposed by Juha Pentikäinen and some other researchers in shamanism (e.g. Hoppál) for emphasizing the considerations described above. For more details, arguments  and references, see Talk:Shamanistic remnants in Hungarian folklore#Shamanhood.
Physis 01:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The title became even more convoluted, so I changed it to "imitation of sounds in shamanism" as that parallels what the similar articles mentioned are called.  Wikipedia always uses the most commonly used words for things in the title. Sticky Parkin 03:30, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 
Talk:Electric Wizard/Our Haunted Kingdom

message: Both artists on this split - Electric Wizard and Our Haunted Kingdom (who changed there name to Orange Goblin) are notable and have articles of their own. This is the debut release by both bands. Both bands also have separate pages for their albums and EPs, in the case of Electric Wizard, their entire catalog has pages. I thought it was a logical step to finish that discography and get Orange Goblin's discography one step closer. ollïegrïnd 12:19, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion

message: I was under the impression that this was the debut release by both bands. The release date was recently changed to 1996 but I checked the record and the copyright on it is 1995. Can anyone confirm if this was released before or after Electric Wizard? BeastmasterGeneral 01:36, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah there seems to be some confusion about this. I recently checked the discography on Rise Above Records official site, and it confirms that this was released after Electric Wizard. But there is no mention of dates. So I checked Encyclopaedia Metallum and Rockdetector, which both say 1996. I think we should keep all the dates on Wikipedia at 1996 unless we find hard proof otherwise. ...Superfopp (talk) 17:01, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are right about the chronology, this is RISE11 and the s/t LP is RISE9. For the release date, I own this record and the date printed on the record inner label is 1995. I don't know if this is hard proof or not. It is possible that the there was a delay in release and it was supposed to be released at the end of 1995 but didn't actually get released until early 1996. I don't know how we would figure that out at this point. BeastmasterGeneral 01:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chrono