lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ixcateopan de Cuauhtémoc (municipality)

message: Good for a stub. Addition of more information in any of the most relevant subjects, including demographic data, landmarks, historical events, government, and notable residents could easily be included as well. John Carter (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Jocotitlán

message: Not bad for what there is. Additional information regarding demographics, history, government, any points of interest and economy could be added. John Carter (talk) 20:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Tatara (furnace)

message: ...3 meters (12 feet)...
3 meters is ten feet, so either metric or imperial should  be modified. - Leonard G. (talk) 01:21, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hardly an expert, but they both seem over-long for any tatara I've seen. However that might just be because I've only seen modern "craft" tatara for sword making, and older ones were bigger. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  metric conversion (Tatara expert needed)
Talk:Candle clock

message: Strictly speaking a clock, by definition, rings a bell or 'clocca'. And there were no clocks before the 12th or 13th century AD. Candle 'clocks' existed before then, so presumably they must have been called something else. A 'hours-candle' perhaps?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.5.22.58 (talk) 17:02, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a clock - but a timepiece of sorts 
Talk:Boca del Cielo

message: Article could stand expansion in all areas. Population, economic, governmental, and historical information, as well as any information on notable landmarks and residents, could all easily be added. John Carter (talk) 21:03, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Slovak Catholic Eparchy of Košice

message: :Ukrainian Catholic Eparchy of Košice → :Eparchy of Košice
*This seems, to an outsider, something that should be done anyway; whether or not the affiliation is correct, we should use the simplest name. Are there objections? If not, this can simply be moved. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Timestream

message: Throughout this article, the word "alternate" is used (as an adjective) where the intended meaning is in fact the adjective "alternative".
But even this substitution does not make sense in the article. If something is in this universe at one moment, then at a later moment must it not be in the same universe? 
What would characterize its being in a different universe at a later moment? If two events in some sort of space-time continuum can be connected by a continuous path within that continuum (even if this space-time is very different from our current conception of our own) ... does that not mean the two events lie in the same universe?  Of course it does!50.205.142.50 (talk) 07:57, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misuse of "alternate"
Talk:Helm (Forgotten Realms)

message: do we care about plagiarism here? Because this is practically a word-for-word transcription of the entry in the Faiths and Pantheons sourcebook... 71.201.53.93 (talk) 21:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If so, I'll tag it as such.  I'm examining the F&P sourcebook as we speak. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 21:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The texts do not match.  Please read what plagiarism is first; this looks more like a summarization. -Jéské (Blah v^_^v) 21:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:15-Crown-5

message: Extensive Google search yielded some improvements. MrBell (talk) 20:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Work has begun
Talk:Wall-clock time

message: The article should incorporate the information that it is possible for wall clock time to be less than CPU time, namely when doing parallel computation on more than one CPU. Eriatarka (talk) 14:09, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CPU time in parallel computing 

message: Should this artical also explain the time differences in a data processing context? A distinction is sometimes made between the time when the processing is actually performed (the Wall clock time ) versus when it should be done. 
Example: Each day a report must be made about orders completed the previous day. Due to a technical problem this was not done for several days. Later the the missing reports need to be generated. At that time the report generation will run as if it was a few days earlier - whereas the actual (wall clock time) time will be later.
In particular, this applies to testing setups of such jobs. 193.191.180.231 (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data processing & time differences 

message: I often see wall time used to describe an entire business process, not just the computer part. As such it also includes delays incurred by the users themselves. The current article talks about programmed delays, and contrary to the variation described which excludes programmed delay, my experience includes user-delays. E.g.
* 8 hour business time/day vs 24 hour wall clock time/day
* user breaks
* waits because the user-operator needs to obtain information from others.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.23.192.33 (talk) 21:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delay extension
Talk:2006 Maine gubernatorial election

message: The county results map is wrong.  Baldacci carried Kennebec County, the sothernmost red county, and Woodcock carried Piscataquis County, the roughly rectangular blue just east of the more easterly of the western two red counties, so the colors of those two counties should be reversed, Kennebec from red to blue and Piscataquis from blue to red.  See http://www.maine.gov/sos/cec/elec/2006g/gen06gv.html . Kevin Lamoreau (talk) 21:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Error on county map
Talk:List of Everton F.C. players

message: There appears to errors in the data provided i've spotted a few which are players from the 80's. Babydoll9799 (talk) 16:18, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Discrepancies
Talk:HMS Donegal (1798)

message: Hi,
I found an engraving of Henry L'Evêque, representing the disembarkation of the troops of Sir Arthur Wellesley in the first days of August, 1808. In this engraving there are a very good representation of the Donegal, as the author reports in his explication of the picture (in the first page of the book): http://purl.pt/13957/1/P37.html
As I don't no to upload images, I hope that someone will see this and do it.
Pardon my english.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.15.72.127 (talk) 20:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a good representation of the disembarking of troops, albeit somewhat stylised. But the only vessel shown in any detail, the one on the far right of the picture, cannot be HMS Donegal. She has only two masts and is altogether far smaller than HMS Donegal. She is almost certainly one of the small transport craft used to land Wellesley's army in Spain. Though the plate is dedicated to Malcolm, it doesn't mean his ship is one of those pictured. Insofar as Donegal features in the print, it is probably as one of the larger ships glimpsed in the left background, riding in deeper water. Benea (talk) 19:42, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good point. Thanks for the correction.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.25.249.223 (talk) 23:31, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Okhotsimsky Dmitrii Evgenievich

message: Dear Cenarium, you made a mistake yourself with regards to the asteroid. Below is the line from the Web page you referred to as "here" in your comments. 
8062 Okhotsymskij 	1977 EZ 	March 13, 1977 	Nauchnij 	N. S. Chernykh
The same information appears in the page of Chernykh if you take time to go there
I am willing to add more verification but I don't clearly understand what can I add for a scientist on top of references to papers, memoirs, prizes and other similar material. 
Please let me know what exactly seems inappropriate in the text. This is my first experience in Wikipedia so I am quite open to learning. Do you happen to have official status in Wikipedia which gives you rights to delete articles?
:Yes, I've already corrected myself, first sign your posts with 4 tildes on a talk page. For the article, some online references would be useful because we can't easily check the sources in the article. I see that a research on Okhotsimsky give some results, so I suppose that it's not a hoax in fact. Cenarium (talk) 21:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We can talk on you talk page. Cenarium (talk) 21:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Brig (disambiguation)

message: The second entry states, "A (chiefly US) term for a naval military prison or jail on a ship or navy base." - but gives no indication of what the non-US term would be. At any rate, I believe this to be inaccurate, since I've found other sources that say it's a chiefly British term, and I can't find any sources at all that give any name other than "brig" for this type of room, no matter what the nationality.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.45.133.142 (talk) 14:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the non-US word for brig?
Talk:IRadio

message: There hasn't been any news about the subject for almost 2 years, and current iRadio website says: 
iRadio has not been commercially released and we have not announced any ship date. No further information is available.
That can be interpreted as an announcement that the project is pretty much dead. I added the article to the vaporware category. Blackboxxx (talk) 21:38, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Nuremberg principles

message: Nato pledged to enforce the principles in order to protect civilians from harm. Specifically, NATO demonstrated a willingness to summarily execute any head of state suspected of failing to protect a civilian from harm. More could be written about NATO and the Nuremberg principles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.112.29.9 (talk) 08:55, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NATO 
Talk:Poliovirus receptor-related 3

message: I propose merging Nectin-3 into Poliovirus receptor-related 3. I think the content in Nectin-3 can easily be explained in the context of Poliovirus receptor-related 3, and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in Bar.GlenTheYid (talk) 23:09, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . Gene Wiki articles generally are about both the gene, and the protein encoded by that gene, so it does make sense to merge these two articles. However I merged it in the other direction since Nectin-3 is the recommended UniProt protein name. Cheers. Boghog (talk) 08:19, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Kent Ninomiya

message: *Historically Significant Kent Ninomiya was the first Asian American male to be a primary news anchor at a US TV station.  That is a significant issue in the journalism and Asian American communities.  It is well known that there are many high profile Asian American women on TV but very few Asian American men.  Just because Markusbradley is on some crusade to remove the wikipedia page doesn't diminish the accomplishment.  That's like saying Jackie Robinson isn't important because you don't like black people.  It is racist to say an issue isn't important just because you personally don't care about it.  There are many people who do care about the Asian male anchor issue.  A discussion on the topic is not complete without mentioning Kent Ninomiya.  Markusbradley also sites false internet rumors about a sex scandal.  If you look at the facts you will see that Kent Ninomiya was never arrested or charged with any crime and left that station months before the woman's trial for reasons not associated with her drunk driving.  [User:Markusbradley|Markusbradley]] has done nothing on wikipedia in more than a year other than try to get the Kent Ninomiya wikipedia page removed.  Ask yourself why he has this agenda and why it means so much to him to have this page removed.  Georgiamonet (talk) 21:59, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Trench boot

message: The boot worn in the picture looks to be a US Model 1904 Garrison Shoe or 1912 Russet Marching Shoe. This can be identified by the toe cap and the different design of the quarters. 76.133.159.235 (talk) 15:54, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boot worn by the soldier in the picture is not a "trench boot"
Talk:Chebyshev linkage

message: [It says " converts rotational motion to approximate straight-line motion" but] I can't see any rotational motion in the animation. Biscuittin (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The blue bar is rotating around the red point. 121.91.115.139 (talk) 03:32, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: More likely the relevant rotation is of one of the green links about their lower pivot as with Hoekens linkage but since neither link does a full rotation the linkage might be said to constrain linear motion (as with the Watts linkage) rather than convert rotary motion. - Rod57 (talk) 12:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is the rotational motion

message: What year was it invented or first published ? - Rod57 (talk) 12:13, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: When invented

message: I've recently been reading through the articles for the straight line mechanisms, and I noticed that the level luffing crane (specifically horse-head jib) more closely resembles a Roberts linkage rather than a Chebyshev linkage. Main reason I have is because the Chebyshev has the point resting on the midpoint of a link, and the longer links are crossed when it travels along the approximate straight portion, however the Roberts linkage already has one of its points displaced to the side and forms an existing triangle, along with the longer links not crossed when performing the straight line movement.
Does anyone have any specific links which explains why the Chebyshev would be more closely related to the luffing crane than the Roberts? Thanks.
As a sidenote, should we give the linkage used in horse-head jib cranes a spot on the list of approximate straight line linkages in the main article? It probably won't need a unique article of its own (similar to the grasshopper linkage which is just merged with the grasshopper beam engine article), but the shape in my opinion is unique enough that it could be a distinct linkage of itself.
--Arglin Kampling (talk) 16:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chebyshev, Roberts, and the Luffing Crane
Talk:Reconsideration of a motion

message: Why are you wanting to transwiki this? Sarsaparilla (talk) 22:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008-02-4 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: I propose to merge Reconsider and enter on the minutes into Reconsider.  They are two forms of the same motion and I do not think they require separate articles.  Right now, the Reconsider article mentions the other form at least three times.  I also think some of the material in Reconsider and enter on the minutes needs to be cut down, so hopefully the combined article would not end up being too long.  Neutron (talk) 18:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would recommend against that. There is substantial room for expansion of both articles, to encompass the philosophy, history, uses, controversy, etc. surrounding these motions. The two motions are also used for quite different purposes, so it is best to keep them in separate articles to avoid confusion. 129.174.91.116 (talk) 18:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I strongly favor the merger . The parliamentary procedure pages are so disperse/broken-up that they begin to lose their value in providing information. Combining a few pages might be beneficial and editors could then concentrate on providing real value in the Parliamentary Procedure category.  Quantity of pages may not be in the best interest of Wikipedia users at the moment.  Let's combine as many pages where ever it makes a little sense and concentrate on quality.  I believe the category will grow faster if we have a good nucleus of quality articles. Instead of creating a new page for every tidbit in RONR, let's get a better game plan. I know that RONR is tops in the US, but this category is Parliamentary Procedure not Robert's Procedure.  The motion "Reconsider and Enter on the Minutes" is of almost no use or value in the real world - although I think it was a creative effort by Robert and I understand why he invented it. Someday, I hope to actually use it. Oops...time to get off the soapbox. Parlirules (talk) 03:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I saw no further objections and completed the merge... 8 years later. Ronruser (talk) 03:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Rothes

message: we dont care more about you your or the wikipedia editors and administrators. We care about the credibility and image of resources. As we got offical review on wikipedia that wikipedia is not more accepted as academic resource on many universities and has image of no credibility and is know for harrassement or as we say mobbing on new edit - the great proof is that on the page rothes are a few words, wikipedia ask for expanding, but wiki administrators delete every word and informations which is written in many publications about the village and special about the famous rothes burn. So sorry for such behavours.
We really dont care about your opinion and researches. What is important for us if wikipedia has credibility by academic resources and university and official said "no".
So we said it for a good image and credibility for us - not to help you expanding anything in wiki.
We will exactly delete in a hour the text . Because we would shame if wiki administrators would accept some new edit. So you dont mean anything to us and honest to say we will also not more use wikipedia as resource due to know the official academic opinion on wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dornochclub (talk • contribs) 22:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Warsaw National Philharmonic Orchestra

message: Hello. Here are some good reliable sources we can use to help expand the article:
*
*
*
*
Hope these help. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources to use 

message: I am considering a possible push for GA status. Here's what we need to do:
*Create a history section with its background up through the 2010s.
*Create a possible Recordings and films section.
*Add other sources from books and research papers.
All are welcome to assist in this process, and if anyone has other suggestions, please let me know here. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:13, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA? 

message: The articles on Victor Young mentions a Julius Wertheim being director of the Warsaw Philharmonic and this is referenced to an article from the Jewish Daily Chronicle from 1920 but all the articles on the Internet seem to be traceable to this Wikipedia article. If I cannot find any more info about Wertheim, I weill delete this from the article but not before I have given others a chance to respond. Mike Hayes (talk) 00:50, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay I figured out that Julius Werheim is Juliusz Wertheim. So let's take it from there. Mike Hayes (talk) 01:06, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Julius Wertheim
Talk:Franz Bischoff

message: I am not researching this individual - however, I was asked to help a person who is.  I found this entry interesting in that it gives his place of birth as "Bomen, Austria." The same was listed at: http://www.franzbischoff.com/ 
I suspect that this is in fact a reference to the Kingdom of Böhmen, or Bohemia, that was part of the Austrian Empire that is traditionally the region around Prague in the Czech Republic.  Here is what is noted in two other on-line biographies I found via Google:
http://www.tfaoi.com/distingu/fb.htm 
http://www.irvinemuseum.org/artist2.html
Finally, here are the references to the U.S. Census that I found him and his wife Bertha and family in:
BISCHOFF, FRANZ   (1900 U.S. Census) 
MICHIGAN , WAYNE, DEARBORN TWP
Age: 35, Male, Race: WHITE, Born: GERM
Series: T623 Roll: 754 Page: 42
BISCHOFF, FRANZ   (1920 U.S. Census) 
CALIFORNIA , LOS ANGELES, SOUTH PASADENA
Age: 56, Male, Race: WHITE, Born: AUST
Series: T625 Roll: 119 Page: 239
Thought I would post this information here in hopes it helps someone.
--RodFleck (talk) 22:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Letter.posted.in.1894.arp.jpg

message: you should post the rest of the letter   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.79.66.51 (talk) 03:08, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

message: It clearly reads Pingstons rather than Pingstone. The grammar confirms this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ultegra (talk • contribs) 16:17, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pingstons

message: Dulverton was and is in Somerset not Devon (see description) 90.242.102.64 (talk) 22:32, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somerset 

message: I think it may be "custome" instead. I'm not sure as to the meaning in this case- it might just mean that he went to his daily business in order that he could visit St. Peter's Church.
192.17.182.233 (talk) 16:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Customers? 

message: Isn't there a better example of a cursive letter that doesn't include a massive run-on sentence?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.57.79.178 (talk) 19:02, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Run-on Sentence 

message: This letter is referenced in the article on Cursive but there is no mention of the cursive style in which it is written. Does anybody know? The uploader? It looks to be quite similar to Spencerian. Any further info appreciated, and would be great to add to the caption.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavinb (talk • contribs) 13:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cursive Style
Portal talk:Spaceflight/On This Day

message: I propose optionally highlighting with a yellow background "On this day" entries which appear in the Wikipedia list of events for the given day. For example, Luna 9's landing appears at February 3, so I have highlighted it in Portal:Spaceflight/On This Day/3 February. Presumably these are the "important" events of the day. (If an important spaceflight event doesn't appear in the Wikipedia list, we should add it there!) Comments? (sdsds - talk) 22:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highlighting
Talk:Ashoka (2008 film)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved per request.  Favonian (talk) 22:31, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ashoka (film) →  – There is a 2006 film of the same name. DareshMohan (talk) 22:28, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 December 2021
Talk:Differential geometry of surfaces

message: The following sentence : 
== Taking a coordinate change from normal coordinates at p to normal coordinates at a nearby point q, yields the Sturm-Liouville equation satisfied by H(r,θ) = G(r,θ)½, discovered by Gauss and later generalised by Jacobi,
Hrr = – K H. The Jacobian of this coordinate change at q is equal to Hr ==
is not clear. 
What is the link between a normal coordinate changes at p to q, and the equation Hrr = – K H. ? Why Hr is the Jacobian of this coordinate change ? 
Thank you for your explanations.
139.124.7.126 (talk) 17:06, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This classical computation is discussed for example in Berger's book. I'll give you a detailed explanation myslef, if I have time.  Mathsci (talk) 13:50, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  normal coordinates change ?