Talk:Danzy Senna

message: :Image:Caucasia.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Caucasia.jpg

message: :Image:Caucasia.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Caucasia.jpg

message: I am working on Danzy Senna's article for a class project. These are some possible sources I may use:
 
 
  (must have an authenticated log in or be a member of a registered institution to unveil full text)
Laur denis (talk) 19:41, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography for Possible Information  

message: Again, I am working on Danzy Senna's article for a class project. Below is a possible way to improve the article's lead section. Aside from adding information, I also hope to help the organization of the article. I am most worried about plagiarism and not citing things correctly. If anyone sees a mistake, please fix it and let me know what the problem was! Thanks! 
Danzy Senna was born in Boston, MA on January 1, 1970 to civil rights activists, Carl Senna and Fanny Howe . She is an American fiction novelist who frequently writes about the issues and struggles of multiracial and multicultural people. Senna's first work, Caucasia (1998), which has been translated into eight languages, put her on the map as a contemporary author as it has won multiple awards, was listed as a Los Angeles Times Best Book of the Year, and was a finalist for the International IMPAC Dublin Literacy Award . Furthermore, Senna won the Whiting Writers Award and has continued being published. On May 3, 2011, Senna published a collection of stories entitled You Are Free. 
Laur denis (talk) 21:08, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Section  

message: I edited and incorporated the original lead section into the new one. There was an error regarding the Orange Prize for Fiction. Senna's "Caucasia" did not win that award, though it was nominated. Most of the lead section is just more information incorporated with the few original sentences.  
Laur denis (talk) 02:59, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live Lead Section  

message: The same IP user (107.184) consistently (since October 2016) removes a lot of sourced content added by other editors from the article (1; 2; 3). I made an attempt to restore some removed content, and also added more. Absolutely all of it was based on the sources in accordance with their content. This has been removed as well, first by the same IP user, and a little later by a newly registered User:Simonecarmichael. 
In the summary of this edit, the user mentioned two points of disagreement (although immeasurably more content was removed). I wanna emphasize that all added content was strictly based on sources:
1. The user said that the piece "about her writing about the pain of looking white" is not in the article cited. It is totally misleading statement as that article clearly says:"...But, in truth, it seems her grandmother did hit her right where it hurt most, as elsewhere in her fiction and autobiographical writings Senna acknowledges the pain of not looking black, and, what is worse, of actually looking white." (p. 133).
2. The user said that the part about 'Caucasian' being inspired by author's life is inaccurate. But this unsubstantiated statement also goes against the source, which says: "The daughter of a white mother and a black father herself, Senna drew Birdie's character from her own childhood struggle with what she called the experience of looking white and identifying as black."
I also have to admit that the sentence about "the pain of not looking black" needs to be put back into the right context to fit the source which makes it clear that it does not mean the pain (of not looking black/of looking white) of every person, but only of a person identifying himself/herself as black. In the right context, such a thesis illustrates the general outline of Senna's work but the wording needs improvement.5.167.161.237 (talk) 20:19, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content dispute 

message: Hello:
The statement below is included in the Caucasia section of the article, but doesn’t seem relevant to the book. I’m wondering if it is relevant to the article overall? It seems a bit like a random piece of information. If it doesn’t seem relevant, can it be removed?
When Senna published Caucasia, her father called to demand a loan.[7]
In the Where Did You Sleep Last Night section, there is this statement:
In 2010, Danzy's father, Carl Senna, sued Senna for "libel, privacy invasion, fraud, and misappropriation of his name and likeness" in the book and claimed she had misled him in telling him what the book was about in order to get information from him for the work.[16]
I’m wondering if this qualifies as balanced content given the lawsuit filing was covered in the press, but the final judgment, with Carl dismissing the entire action in January of 2011 was not. Given only one side of the situation is covered in the article about Danzy Senna, I’m wondering if without the final determination, it may qualify as contentious content? If so, can it be removed? Thank you for your time and attention to these requests.
Thank you and best, LeepKendall (talk) 17:14, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi User:LEvalyn: It looks like may be on a Wiki break. You were so generous with your time on the previously proposed edits, I wanted to ask you about this latest round. When you are back and have time, I'd be grateful for your review. Best, LeepKendall (talk) 18:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , I have indeed been dialling back my wiki editing for a bit, and I've also been mulling this over a little. I understand why Senna would would want these statements removed, so I have been thinking about what makes for the best, most informative article. The sourcing is very solid for both lines, since the cited sources are not the only news articles that mention them. I think the first item, about the loan, makes sense to keep largely because of its relationship to the later lawsuit. And the lawsuit was the sole topic of independent coverage, sometimes overshadowing the book itself, and therefore I think needs at least a mention. For both statements, I'm not aware that either has been challenged as unfactual and there are multiple sources for each, so I wouldn't consider them contentious. And the current information seems sufficiently brief and to-the-point that they don't feel WP:UNDUE. So I think it does not make sense to simply remove them. If you'd like to add more information about the outcome of the case, that information can be added through citations to primary sources if any are available (eg court filings). You're also welcome to propose other kinds of edits (eg rewording or adding other context) and to see if other editors have a different opinion. ~ L 🌸 (talk) 00:27, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you so much for your thoughtful feedback User:LEvalyn. I see exactly what you are saying and shared with Danzy that this was likely to be the outcome. Given that the two statements aren't related to the content of the book sections they are in, per se, what would you think of moving them to another section, like maybe personal life? She wasn't keen on having a personal life section, but I told her it is part of the standard template for BLP pages, and an editor may add it at some point. I'd appreciate your thoughts on that type of edit for these statements. As always, thank you! LeepKendall (talk) 20:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI Request - Relevant Article Content