lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Brown (Australian politician)

message: ::And former Tourism Minister John Brown sparked a national outcry by branding koalas (OK, so they're not bears but many Americans think they are!) as "flea-ridden, piddling, stinking, scratching, rotten little things". http://www.theage.com.au/national/house-on-the-hill-20080618-2sxa.html
:wasn't this because he was "scratched and peed on by a koala he was cuddling for the cameras"? http://www.collectorsweekly.com/stories/66970-oz-koala-cartoon--jim-russell-c-1985
so maybe it is understandable, if the context is provided.  Also note such complaints are not isolated:
::"Having a koala urinate on you isn't pleasant -- especially if it puts you at risk of getting chlamydia."  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/23/koala-chlamydia-one-direction_n_1447490.html 
--SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:40, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "flea-ridden, piddling, stinking, scratching, rotten little things" 
Talk:1968 Chicago White Sox season

message: Nine games in Milwaukee, and 58 remaining home games? they weren't forced to play on the road any extra games, baseball-reference.com shows them playing 81 games each. I think that should be 72 remaining home (Chicago) games, but I'm not changing it because it could have been a mistake in the number of games in Milwaukee instead. however, I'm pretty sure there were 72 games in Chicago and 9 in Milwaukee.108.192.86.137 (talk) 15:01, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many home vs. Milwaukee games?
Talk:FC Minsk

message: FC Minsk is generally seen in Belorusian football community as new team and not as successor of Torpedo. Despite the fact that the team was announced in early 2006 by Minsk major as a merger of Minsk clubs Torpedo-SKA and Smena, it has a new name, new owner and new squad (only two players from 2005 squad of Torpedo). The only other things remained from Torpedo are the stadium and training facilities. I suggest creating the separate page for Torpedo. --NineInchRuiner (talk) 11:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Torpedo Minsk
Talk:Keefe, Bruyette & Woods

message: why this short article is of questionable neutrality?
Lamro (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keefe, Bruyette & Woods 

message: The only content under the controversy section was from 1999--twenty+ years ago. The only source for the section was a permanently dead link. The controversy was also apparently inconsequential: it said the firm paid $75,000 to resolve it, which is a really small sum of money for these firms. Two sentences isn't enough to justify an entire subsection, and the particular event isn't notable enough to be included in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ImVeryAwesome (talk • contribs) 01:49, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Controversy Section
Talk:FC Santboià

message: Quisiera comprar el uniforme como lo compró?? 188.77.184.185 (talk) 10:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Como compró el uniforme??
Talk:Ultraman Mebius & Ultraman Brothers

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: move Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:41, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
*:No it doesn't. For whatever reason Tsuburaya had had the English titles different from the literal translations. See Superior Ultraman 8 Brothers and Mega Monster Battle: Ultra Galaxy.—Ryulong (琉竜) 18:26, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 
Talk:Sheepdog (song)

message: A redirect of the song to the article does not imply that the two things are the same. Being a single is by itself not a reason to have a separate article. As this single is uncharted and there aren't any sources, I'll merge for the time being the content per WP:Music#Songs. This does not exclude fleshing it out to a full article in case some good sources can be added or the single gets crated at a later time. --Tikiwont 08:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chilean battleship Almirante Latorre

message: Under general characteristics the article says twelve 6 inch guns. The included diagram and one other site says that the actual count is sixteen. The count on actual pictures  also seems to be 16.
Mike Potter ; pottermd@bell.net
--65.93.46.81 (talk) 21:26, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice catch—thanks very much! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 21:30, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  6 inch guns Almirante Latorre ( HMS Canada) 

message: Nothing so far on the design. Looks like the Iron Duke class but a full discussion would be good. Rcbutcher (talk) 10:30, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs design background

message: Can you expand on your rationale for adding :File:The Royal Navy on the Home Front, 1914-1918 Q18972.jpg to this article? I couldn't access either of the URLs you put in this edit summary, and beyond that I'm not sure the image is relevant enough to this article's subject. The rifles tell us very little about the ship, the people never crewed this battleship, and you can barely see the rifles in any case. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:37, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:The Royal Navy on the Home Front, 1914-1918 Q18972.jpg]]
Talk:Man on the Corner

message: Whoever's doing it, stop changing it back. It is not a CR-78 - it is a TR-808. Yes, Phil and the band often used the CR-78. But that's not what they're using here. The little pitter-pat pattern at the start of the song is quite distinctively the 808.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.73.221 (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drum machine
Talk:Four Corner Hustlers

message: wild 100s 4s  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.29.78.20 (talk) 22:12, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is black diamond 2600:1700:B666:CC10:AD76:6833:4B1A:9E65 (talk) 02:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foebaby_bryson
Talk:Khoo Kheng-Hor

message: This looks suspiciously like a vanity article...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.63.197.246 (talk) 20:31, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hime cut

message: Isn't this just a mullet?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.55.176.90 (talk) 01:22, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mullet?
Talk:Eleanor of Scotland

message: Article statistics prior to copyedit:
* File size: 61 kB
* Prose size (including all HTML code): 2756 B
* References (including all HTML code): 0 B
* Prose size (text only): 1834 B (308 words) "readable prose size"
* References (text only): 0 B
--Mikemoral♪♫ 17:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:GOCE]]
Talk:Manama Club (football)

message: I noticed that the content used for this topic was actually posted verbatim word for word from my website: http://club-soccer.com. You can use the article but please put a reference to the website if you want to copy and paste information from the article. If not, then please delete the article and write the article yourself. Otherwise, its just plain plagiarism of copy and paste variety. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Klubber000 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content use 

message: the info in this article isnt about this club - is about Al-Arabi SC (Kuwait)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.236.73.90 (talk) 19:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info !!
Talk:Altrincham Interchange

message: This statement: 'Like most stations on the Mid-Cheshire line passenger numbers have risen over recent years. However, surprisingly Altrincham has lower rail passenger numbers than the nearby town of Knutsford, despite many leaving the National Rail Network at Altrincham to change to the Manchester Metrolink.' requires verification. I doubt that anyone already on a train to Manchester will get off at Altrincham to continue on to Manchester via Metrolink. And I can't imagine passengers from Cheshire would have much use for the intermediate stations that Metrolink serves.  Maybe if someone could provide some figures?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.171.129.75 (talk) 15:04, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mid Cheshire line

message: Redrose64 : You are stating that my comment about car drop offs is unsourced. If you go on Google Earth you can actually see 3 parking places that are marked up as "Kiss and Ride" on the side of the station adjacent to Platform 4 Altfish (talk) 21:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Doing so would fail WP:NOR. As advised at Talk:Navigation Road station#Park & Ride, what is acceptable is to find an item in the Manchester Evening News, or the Sale & Altrincham Messenger, which describes car parking problems. Then, you can add the item with a reference. Please see also WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:NOTTIMETABLE - I sincerely doubt that the number of car drop-off points is encyclopedic. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:52, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no car parking problem at Altrincham Station, the parking problem was at Navigation Road. Why would there be a story in the MEN or SAM saying, "Parking is ok at Altrincham Station"? It is a fact that they are there and a useful fact to know if you are a passenger. Altfish (talk) 16:46, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, so the word "problems" is out of context; but if there is ongoing improvement work at the station, the local press will surely have written something about what intending passengers can expect to be faced with during the works (besides the changes they may find upon completion). It may be useful: but it is also a fact that Wikipedia is not a travel guide. --Redrose64 (talk) 23:50, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Car drop offs
Talk:A Fire in the Sun

message: The Dylan lyric provenance of the title is obvious, not speculation, when you know the title of the previous novel in the series ("When Gravity Fails") references another Dylan song lyric ("Just Like Tom Thumb Blues"). I'm not removing the "citation needed" tag but some established Wikipedant probably should.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.26.64.192 (talk) 18:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Cornbrook tram stop

message: Trams to MediaCityUK go directly from Manchester city centre, so has the shuttle idea been abandoned?--J3Mrs (talk) 13:17, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Cornbrook turnback siding hasnt been commisioned yet due to the delays with signalling. WatcherZero (talk) 15:41, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you--J3Mrs (talk) 16:01, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trams to MediaCityUK 

message: I believe it was named after Cornbrook Junction on the CLC line, and not after Cornbrook Road. 80.229.129.45 (talk) 14:42, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, belief fails the policy on verifiability, and unless you are careful, the policy on original research, also. We would need some reliable source to support any such claim. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:54, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 
Talk:Deansgate-Castlefield tram stop

message: Hello, Can somebody please edit the wikipedia page to include the recent service change that has seen the trafford line extend to deansgate. I would do this myself but I am sadly not skilled enough in editing to do so. Thanks for the help! JamesOnWiki101 (talk) 20:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trafford Line extention to Deansgate
Talk:Navigation Road station

message: I added the comment about it being full after 0730 because personal experience tells me it is! I have no reference for this (Doubt there is any) but it is useful information for people wishing to use this facilityAltfish (talk) 18:29, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Personal experience is very much original research, and also fails verifiability. Warning people to get there early is not a neutral point of view. What is acceptable is to find an item in the Manchester Evening News, or the Sale & Altrincham Messenger, which describes car parking problems. Then, you can add the item with a reference.  --Redrose64 (talk) 19:37, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK it stays as it is. Altfish (talk) 20:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Park & Ride

message: I do not believe this station was anything to do with the MSJ&AR as it had ceased to exist; by Grouping in 1923 the LMR were responsible for the line, although the LNER had some rights over it. The social club in the car park built at the same time as the station was known as the LMRCA Club (London Midland Railway Clubs Association; so I strongly suspect the station was opened by the LMR, along with Dane Road and Warwick Road. I shall search for a reference for this. Altfish (talk) 20:33, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The MSJ&AR continued to exist after Grouping; it is explicitly listed in the Transport Act 1947, third schedule (about halfway down page 145) under the heading "Bodies whose Undertakings are Transferred to Commission". This is not unusual - quite a lot of other joint railways are listed, in contrast to the Railways Act 1921, which named only one joint railway, the Portpatrick and Wigtownshire Joint Railway. In 1923, several joint railways did become wholly owned by the London, Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS), or by the LNER, etc. by virtue of their previous owners having all been placed in the same group in the 1921 Act; but joint railways whose owners were placed in different groups remained joint, albeit with new owners. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:48, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, you are correct, I thought it had become the MSJ&A Committee rather than railway, the Committee being run jointly by the LMR and LNER. Altfish (talk) 11:55, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Piccadilly Gardens tram stop

message: Needs a new post upgrade image showing the canopy. WatcherZero (talk) 13:20, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I don't have access to my books at this moment in time, but have changed the opening date in this article from 20 July 1992 to 27 April 1992 - I understand this to be the correct opening date. Please change (and reference) if I've got this mixed up. --Jza84 |  Talk   16:49, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The curious thing is that Butt (1995) shows 20 March 1992; a date shown against just one other Metrolink stop - St Peter's Square. Unfortunately, I couldn't check whether Piccadilly or Victoria also "opened 20 March 1992", because Butt doesn't give Metrolink opening dates for those two - I assume that it's because he treats the Metrolink platforms as part of the main stations, which of course never closed. By contrast, Sale etc. are shown as closed 25 December 1991, reopened 15 June 1992. --Redrose64 (talk) 10:52, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening date 

message: A proposal has been made to rename this article to Piccadilly Gardens tram stop. A discussion is being held at Talk:Manchester Metrolink#Metrolink station renaming proposal.. Est8286 (talk) 01:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed renaming
Talk:Shudehill Interchange

message: Since the current official document don't mention the line going this far, should this be shown? If it is, I believe the line should be reversed so it runs Manchester – Rochdale, and coloured purple; for consistency with the rest of the network. Andrew (talk) 01:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rochdale-Manchester line 

message: , , 
As it was reported at WT:UKRAIL, there appears to be some dispute about what should be included. For what it's worth, I would include all of what G-13114 added, apart from the details about past bus services. But clearly having a mention of the stop's history, and where one can get trains to, is relevant. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:36, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war
Talk:List of cities in Vietnam

message: I copies the list of cities in Vietnam from Vietnamese Wikipedia. Some “cities” previously listed are only townships (thị xã), so they've been removed in this list. -✉ Hello World! 09:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Coonen Cross Oath

message: Coonan Cross Oathcan be merged to Coonen Cross Oath
Tinucherian 09:19, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

message: There are two articles created Coonan Cross Oath and Coonen Cross Oath both looks same. Inviting a third opinion on which one should keep. Thanks. --Avinesh Jose   T   09:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Work done, redirected per your suggestion. Thanks. --Avinesh Jose   T   04:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge issues
Talk:2008 in American television

message: Okay, this has been removed twice. I have stated that Yu-Gi-Oh! GX 's network change from Cartoon Network to 4Kids TV was a change in network affiliation, but it has been removed twice because "it wasn't new episodes", when it WAS new episodes. "Return of the Sacred Beasts", episode 126, was the last new episode to air on Cartoon Network, November 10, 2007 . The show was then pulled from Cartoon Network's lineup, but it was airing in reruns on 4Kids TV. Then, on January 19, 2008, "Breaking the Sacred Seal", episode 127, aired on 4Kids TV , and the show continued airing new episodes there. Therefore, it was a change in network affiliation, and not just reruns. So please stop removing GX from the "Changes in Network Affiliation" section. Matty-chan (talk) 03:28, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yu-Gi-Oh! GX 

message: I just noticed none of the statements in this article have sources listed (except the one I just put up). Someone is being anal about sources in the 2009 in television article, this one should have the same rules.TomCat4680 (talk) 06:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources missing 

message: Can the television movie Knight Rider (2008 film) be added?  Allen (talk) 22:28, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knight Rider (2008 film) 
Talk:Heart of Stone Tour

message: On Friday August 17th 1990 Cher played the L.B. Day Amphitheater in Salem Oregon, during the HEART OF STONE TOUR. I still have the original ticket stub from that show. It seems to be left off the list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.229.133.73 (talk) 03:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Concert Date
Talk:1997 in American television

message: Like the previous Disney television shows The Mickey Mouse Club, Disneyland and Zorro in the 1950s, Hercules and the Tapestry of Fate was never aired on ABC in Fall 1997.
Walt Disney Television Animation did never produced Hercules: The Animated Series until August 31, 1998.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.18.244 (talk) 16:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Hercules and the Tapestry of Fate'' (Disney animated television special)
Talk:1996 in American television

message: in the events it says the Dallas movie aired Dec 15, however under TV movies Nov 15th.  Which is it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7080:5706:59A:22D1:420B:F5B8:E98 (talk) 03:37, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Talk:1993 in American television

message: Some debuts are also in events, should that be like that? it makes the 'Events' table a bit broader than just events. IMHO Omar (talk) 00:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Overlap

message: Some items on the events list honestly do not seem that important, or have no historical relevance. For example, the episode of rugrats where Angelica breaks her leg? I mean, yeah there’s the meme with Stu making the pudding , but that’s not mentioned. Deadmallsanita (talk) 12:52, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance?
Talk:The Physician

message: The plot is quite unaccurate, I believe it should be rewritten totally. I'll try to do it myself.--190.234.142.196 (talk) 17:14, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot needs rewriting 

message: This article has no proper references. Could someone add them or at least add the proper template? I'm sorry, I don't know how to do that.--190.234.142.196 (talk) 17:16, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No inline citations and only one reference 

message: The page reads like a puff-piece and ignores the novel's problems with historical accuracy. The characters' names and depictions of 1020s London are preposterous. This was pre-Norman Conquest, reign of Cnut Sveinsson, yet the characters have names more redolent of Victorian (or modern American) fiction, and the idea of a Guild of Carpenters & c belongs more to the later Middle Ages. My "willing suspension of disbelief" barely outlasted the first page. If a novelist can't even be bothered to give his characters in-period, culturally appropriate names, why read on? Silverwhistle (talk) 22:15, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical accuracy?
Talk:1977 in American television

message: I liked the page better when It wasn't subcategorized by network, and was primarily chronological(debuts & list of shows).  Maybe its just me, but its easier for me to follow a chronological flow, rather than organizing everything by Network. The subcategories become a little ridiculous- the cable networks/Cube have one entry each- is this really necessary?  While the network a show is on is important, creating all these subcategories breaks up the linear progression of the page.  For example, Its now much harder to see which shows were running the longest because you have to jump back and forth between all the different network sections.  Sorry if I'm not explaining this as clearly as possible, but this is one vote for going back to the old way and putting the network the show is on to the right of the show...
Tominrochester (talk) 02:41, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I hear you, and maybe one of these days I (or someone else) will do a sortable wikitable, that can be sorted by year or network. --Musdan77 (talk) 04:01, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Organization of page
Talk:1968 in television

message: So when were the Emmys broadcast...?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  05:47, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: And the winner is...?
Talk:1966 in television

message: Tagged for no apparent reason.71.222.116.50 (talk) 06:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalise 
Talk:1964 in television

message: The first "NBC Week" was in 1965, not in 1964, as mentioned in the Castleman/Podrazik book "Watching TV".192.220.136.82 (talk) 19:39, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to wise guys 

message: What network broadcast the '64 Olympics...?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  23:49, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Going for bronze
Talk:1958 in television

message: Gary Oldman is an English actor. He is not American. 59.184.171.238 (talk) 14:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gary Oldman is English, not American 
Talk:Komatsu LAV

message: Needs a full description of the vehicle to be considered fully complete.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:59, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Talk:1956 in television

message: Seems to only include US and UK series. Is there any particular reason why 1956 Australian television debuts like The Isador Goodman Show, Sydney Tonight, The Judy Jack Show and Picture Page among others aren't listed? Are they not considered notable enough? Suddenly There Is a Valley (talk) 09:08, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I'll add some of them myself Suddenly There Is a Valley (talk) 23:31, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: List of television series
Talk:1949 in television

message: So what network broadcast “The Lone Ranger”?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  17:50, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was on ABC. (I realize that this reply is almost seven years late, but I just saw your question a few minutes ago.) Eddie Blick (talk) 01:43, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where'o Silver?