lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Phạm Văn Đồng

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ngô Bảo Châu which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:30, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: I have removed the following paragraph from the "1954 to 1987" section: "He is also known who signed paper to donate the Islands Hoang Sa(Paracel) and Truong Sa (Spratly) Islands to China."
First of all, this sentence isn't quite accurate – the islands weren't 'donated'. What happened was that in 1958 the government of PRC issued a statement proclaiming the limit of their territorial waters to be 12 nautical miles from the coast, which included Paracel and Spratley islands. Pham Van Dong, being head of the government of North Vietnam, sent a formal note to the government of PRC recognizing these territorial claims. North Vietnam had to do this because their war efforts against South Vietnam were for the most part financed by PRC at the time. Soon after the fall of Saigon and the reunification of the country, Vietnam started claiming these territories as part of their country, with Pham Van Dong still in office.
Secondly, the content of the removed sentence (even if it were accurate) cannot be compared in importance with the rest of the information in the section. 95.129.170.53 (talk) 08:26, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate (and irrelevant) information concerning the islands dispute
Talk:Edmund Rubbra

message: (Which is the proper article, by the way- avoid redirects!)
Removed a polemical sentence. There are works - mostly in his shelf drawer to my knowledge, including the discarded piano concerto opus 30 I think? - in which Rubbra approached and/or used the twelve-tone technique in one way or another; and he was one of many composers who "refused to use it".  How this fit in with Glock's tenure at the BBC, with whom it was or was not fashionable, and other matters- indeed, calling it fashionable is something that requires considerable explanation and should not be done at the beginning of an encyclopedia at -all-, it's rather an in-joke; fashionable among composers perhaps (I like many works composed written using the technique, and am at most an ex-composer) but not (yet?) the general public (some works by Schoenberg, Webern and Berg work very well, and I will say because of good use of the technique- I am not making a polemical anti-serial case here, I am saying that claiming it was fashionable immediately announces "I'm talking to my own audience, because it certainly wasn't fashionable among people you knew, was it?" to most readers... which is rather anti-Wikipedia right there...) - (edit to finish the sentence *g*) ... how that fits in with Glock, composer culture in the 20th century, ...- much too large a topic.
Getting back to Rubbra: he did not refuse to be diverted apparently- he tried the method, and decided not to use it later. That's a diversion and a decision. A small difference and not worthy of an opening paragiraffe distinction; instead, I think, worthy of opening paragraph -omission-, making Rubbra someone who cannot be brought in into the Stubborn Won't Even Taste the Green Eggs and Ham Army... - hence, my deletion. Schissel | Sound the Note! 20:00, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Twelve-tone technique]]

message: Can someone please upload a suitable photo of this important (but shamefully neglected) composer?  John Hamilton (talk) 15:08, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Philip Stone

message: Philip's wife was my cousin and her maiden name was Margaret PICKARD , not Pickford 49.224.85.5 (talk) 23:11, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philip's wife 

message: His role as Father Leopoldo in Monsignor Quixote is not listed. 2607:FEA8:BCDD:BD00:292B:CDB0:2A63:34BC (talk) 22:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing entry in filmography
Talk:Phyllis Gates

message: This article presumes that the marriage was a deception.  That is not accepted fact - quite the reverse. There is no evidence it was not a genuine marriage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnC (talk • contribs) 06:20, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: She privately admitted she was a lesbian who knew Hudson was gay from the very beginning.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.178.202.51 (talk) 10:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage deception

message: Was she really born in 1925, the same year as Rock Hudson? According to this, she was four years younger than him. https://latimesblogs.latimes.com/thedailymirror/2007/10/rock-hudsons-we.html 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:544F:E012:2320:EFE4 (talk) 22:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year
Talk:Pierre Moerlen

message: 1978 - Thin Lizzy - Live & Dangerous ??? where did you get this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.188.206.231 (talk) 23:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It was not in Moscow. Sessions from April till June 2002 in St.Petersburg, Russia 92.62.53.16 (talk) 14:34, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Last studio works
Talk:Ploutis Servas

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Pops Staples

message: We need to find sources that talk up his fantastic Telecaster playing, and also his role as Creon (with Telecaster) in the Goodman Theatre's production of the musical "Gospel at Colonus".  (When I find time, I'll look.) Acwilson9 (talk) 17:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electric guitarist
Talk:Murder of Erica Green

message: The current picture on this page is not Erica Green.  The media at first thought this pic was her.  But later another pic of the real Erica Green showed up.  Here is the real pic of Erica Green from CNN.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/US/05/05/precious.doe/
Delariean 15:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Picture 
Talk:Carl Bernadotte

message: I take issue with a section like Issue in this article. If WP is not a forum for genealogy at large how are all those names relevant to his bio? Some of these kids were born after his death and never even met Carl. Are they a part of his life story in any relevant way? SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entire roster of decendants relevant? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 23:49, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Prince Carl Bernadotte →  – A recent discussion on the page Prince Oscar Bernadotte resulted in the move to simply Oscar Bernadotte leaving this page the only one dedicated to a disinherited scion of the Bernadotte dynasty having the title of prince as a prefix in the title. The editors in that discussion favored consistency as the main rationale but it's doubtful if these titles were ever used correctly on Wikipedia and in the media. Prince Bernadotte seems to be a title that's supposed to be used after the personal name and not in a way that adds a princely prefix before the personal name. There was another Carl Bernadotte but this is sufficiently disambiguated as the other one was known as Carl Johan. Killuminator (talk) 21:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Support per nom. None of the other Princes Bernadotte include their princely prefix as of now. I agree with the nominator that there is already enough disambiguation between Carl Bernadotte and Carl Johan Bernadotte. A hatnote already exists to solve any confusion. estar8806 (talk) ★ 22:49, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 September 2023
Talk:Lennart Bernadotte

message: The marriage of a son that is scheduled to take place next year has already been added to this article. According to WP:Crystal ball that is not to be done. I am cordiallly asking the editor who reverses this to stop it. SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:03, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, no problem, I will stop. Should I revert this edit too? Greets, Trijnstel (talk) 17:28, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not familiar with that issue. If you just respect the removal of that marriage next year; I'm Ok with this. SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP does not predict 

message: Bernadotte's wives names and amount of his offspring should be mentioned in the article text. The whole section on "Marriages and issue" looks to me like a poor excuse to name-drop a large amount of totally non-encyclopedic people who shouldn't be mentioned anywhere at all, but whom anyone who wants to know about his wives will see. Can someone please redo this? - I don't know how. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Tried to fix this myself, hoping I didn't screw things up. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sly name-dropping?

message: I rolled bach edits where well-referenced facts about his titles had been removed without dicsussion. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:23, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Talk:Prince Bernadotte. /Elzo 90 (talk) 14:45, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Rolled back removal of referenced facts
Talk:Sigvard Bernadotte

message: Why is this in the category "Industrial Designers"? -mrbartjens 09:55, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: English Wikipedia is not a genealogy site. I am removing non-notable relatives (again). --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of non-notable grand-children & great-grandchildren

message: Is there any available source for this section? 2angelgoats (talk) 16:33, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Marriages" section 

message: "His cousin Lennart Bernadotte, who two years earlier had experienced the same thing (as the first Swede in history),"
I think this is claiming that Lennart was the "first Swede in history" to have married unequally and lost his title? If that's what it's saying, it's untrue. Prince Oscar Bernadotte, Lennart's great uncle, married a commoner in 1888 and was created Prince Bernadotte. 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:544F:E012:2320:EFE4 (talk) 02:02, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles  
Talk:Prince Tomislav of Yugoslavia

message: The article refers to prince Tomislav's children and grandchildren as "princes" and "princesses". This is blatantly untrue. 
None of Prince Tomislav's children have a right to princely status, because the status needed to be confirmed in the National Assembly of Yugoslavia and signed by the ruling monarch and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia did not exist when they were born, or ever since. Prince Tomislav, on the other hand, had this right because his status had been confirmed by the constituion in force when he was born.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.245.37.238 (talk) 21:29, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  None of Prince Tomislav's children have a right to princely status 

message: Why is it that the daughter is the only one actually linked to an article? When you hover over the sons' names, they all say "was" as if they're dead. When you click on their names, it just goes back to their father's article. If there's no article for them, then why the link? Also, why is there a blurb and why does it say "was" when you hover over their names? 76.202.192.102 (talk) 03:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children's articles/status
Talk:Princess Shruti of Nepal

message: "However many Nepalese suspect that Gyanendra was the mastermind behind the royal palace massacre on 1 June 2001." Ah... who?  This person or organization is not mentioned any where in the article. --Knulclunk 02:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is this mastermind? 

message: I think it's time to correct this article to reflect the fact that the investigative team concluded that Prince Dipendra did the shooting.  As it stands now, NINE years later, the article reflects a biased point of view, as if the author doesn't want to admit that the prince did it. Caeruleancentaur (talk) 13:45, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whodunit? 
Talk:David Robinson (horticulturist)

message: Some nice new data has been added around the above topic, but does not belong in the biography of the second last owner; rather than lose it, I suggest a new article on the house and gardens be made.  Any volunteers?SeoR (talk) 21:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split out Earlscliffe (house and gardens) to new article
Talk:Battle of Albelda (851)

message: What is correct? Here it says that Battle of Albelda was a battle between christians and muslims. In García I of Pamplona article, it says that it was a battle between Vikings and christinas. Here's the phrase: Ordoño I of Asturias and García triumphed over the new Scandinavian invaders in the Battle of Albelda that year. What's true? Who was the enemy? sr:Корисник:Maduixa--62.57.41.162 14:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Al-Azraq Treaty of 1245

message: The translation was copyright its author... thereore you can't quote the whole thing without a significant amount of commentary on the subject.  It's fine to link to the source... or incorporate parts of it... but, having 95% of the article as the text can't be construed as fair use.  If you get some other sources and integrate relevant parts of the text that would be fine... or if you can find an older translation (or the original Arabic / Spanish for wikisource) then you can paste that as long as it's in the public domain.  However, that webpage says "COPYRIGHT 2000 Phi Alpha Theta, History Honor Society, Inc." gren グレン 01:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not so , the article may be copyrighted but the actual treaty is in the public domain and is not copyrighted. There is no hard and fast rule in copyright law to determine if literal translation is copyrightable so you have no ground to support you assertion about copyvio.--Aesed 03:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Translations can be copyrighted... many Bible and Qur'an translations are copyrighted... and... literal is pretty ambiguous.  If you can show that it't not copyrighted then please do.  But... under U.S. law translations can be copyrighted... since... many of them are? gren グレン 04:21, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thank you for including the actual text of the documents, but the purpose of Wikipedia is not simply to present documents, but rather to relate their purpose, their significance and importance, etc. Please expand upon the background events which led to the signing of this treaty, a summary of its key provisions, its consequences and overall historical significance. LordAmeth 21:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment

message: specially about the number 2 of the section " Influences on the Treaty " about the planned marriage between the count of Toulouse and the heiress of the province Beatriu ! Which province ? which Beatriu ? I'd just modified: the name of the " province " is " county of Provence ", And Beatriu was the daughter of the catalan count Ramon-Beranger, cousin of James I Christofol (talk) 22:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources , please !
Talk:McNary Dam

message: Free photos from the US Government of the McNary Lock and Dam, located on the Columbia River between Oregon and Washington and built in 1953 are located at www.nww.usace.army.milBroken link. -- Suntag ☼ 15:52, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced the gallery with a link to commons. Left the one picture that hasn't been uploaded to commons. Bobjgalindo (talk) 21:06, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Free photos

message: The lock apparently is the highest single-lift lock in the world, with a lift of 75 feet. See
https://www.nww.usace.army.mil/Locations/District-Locks-and-Dams/McNary-Lock-and-Dam/
Shouldn't this be noted?  I happened upon this information while researching the history of the region. The Peterborough Lock #21 in Ontario with a lift of 65 feet, has a well established cheering section on the Web for the title, though its Wikipedia page uses the past tense. I don't know a lock from a hole in the ground...somebody who does should look into this. Cpacker666 (talk) 22:30, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lock may have world's highest lift
Talk:Rachel Whitear

message: Didn't one of the autopsies find that she was placed in the foetal position after she had died, to make it look like an overdose?  This would tie up with the toxicology  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.103.163.11 (talk) 16:26, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foetal position 

message: I'm a little confused -- the page talks about the toxicology result finding heroin in her bloodstream, but looking for heroin, specifically, is very unusual in a toxicology lab.  Every lab I've ever heard of will search for morphine and/or 6-monoacetylmorphine.  I've never even heard of a lab that tests postmortem blood for heroin.
Also, I question the number (0.15 micrograms/Liter) given as a fatal blood concentration.  As far as I've ever seen (and according to Baselt), there is no such thing as an established fatal concentration of heroin.  It is also very difficult to establish a fatal concentration of morphine, as individual tolerance can play an enormous part -- a concentration that would be ten times the fatal level for one individual may be a steady-state concentration for a hardcore user.
Thirdly, if the result given in this article is for morphine (and not heroin), then it is important to distinguish whether the concentration is for unbound morphine, or whether the result includes morphine-glucoronide as well (total morphine).  Concentrations of the latter can be more than an order of magnitude higher than the concentration of unbound morphine alone. 206.194.127.112 (talk) 22:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 206.194.127.112 uses "0.15 micrograms/Liter". This might be a mistake for "milliliter".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.194.200 (talk) 13:35, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toxicology
Talk:Grey triggerfish

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Pez ballesta_(Balistes_capriscus),_Parque_natural_de_la_Arrábida,_Portugal,_2020-07-23,_DD_24.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for November 19, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-11-19. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 13:51, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Raful Neal

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/raful-neal-mn0000329095/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 20:59, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Ralph Burns

message: More images could be uploaded from here if desired. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:01, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Free images available

message: 20 sources for the first sentence, one at the end, and none in between!
The main text needs more citations. EddieHugh (talk) 16:34, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: The "Filmography" is not a filmography as it lists work that Burns did for Broadway productions which were not filmed.  The sections should be separated to reflect the different areas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.125.185 (talk) 14:55, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Filmography"
Talk:Butcher knife

message: No photo of a typical butcher knife (or cleaver)? Drsruli (talk) 23:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo?
Talk:Ralph Shapey

message: This reads like a press release: surely someone can write something more objective/scholarly.
67.176.185.112 (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:New Jersey Route 68

message: More details, please.Mitch/HC32 00:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Honest to say, I cannot find much more about this planned freeway. Dough4872 (talk) 00:28, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route 68 Freeway 

message: The major junctions table appears to leave out the junction with CR 670 mentioned in the first paragraph of the RD. Also, I'd argue that CR 537 should be removed from the infobox, unless it's a major freeway or something. --LJ (talk) 16:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For a route of this length, it is standard to include junctions with 500-series county routes. By the way, 537 is a long route that crosses the east-west length of New Jersey. Dough4872 (talk) 02:17, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I didn't see the separate standards at the NJSCR page before. --LJ (talk) 07:45, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I actually wanna put in that LJ is right. CR 670 is notable enough, as it is a former 500s CR spur (Spur CR 528) in Burlington.Mitch32(The Password is... See here!) 10:18, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  intersecting routes 
Talk:Ramón Arellano Félix

message: Luis Fernando Sánchez Arellano is son of Ramon Arellano Felix's sister ENEDINA not Alicia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2803:D100:EBC0:BBA:D1E1:F2B2:9067:4006 (talk) 17:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

message: Big time player. 2A01:4C8:484:B2A3:D8E0:4C3B:65B0:31BD (talk) 22:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top man
Talk:New Jersey Route 79

message: Route 79 North ends just at Route 34 , I thik Route 516 is a mile west of Route 516 --24.228.70.72 (talk) 21:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 