Talk:Judeopolonia

message: Is this concept really notable? Perhaps it should be merged to żydokomuna...? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  20:39, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be merged to "Zydokomuna" (separate short section ?)--Jacurek (talk) 22:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Or into one of the first paragraphs, as it is a concept that predates and likely facilitated the development of żydokomuna... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:10, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ya, I think so..--Jacurek (talk) 18:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?

message: Should we mention that this has roots in anti-Semitism/Judeophobia? Also, I want to add a link to History of Jews in Poland. Shikku27316 (talk) 02:31, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judeopolonia 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Judeopolonia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090524054231/http://naszawitryna.pl/ksiazki_47.html to http://www.naszawitryna.pl/ksiazki_47.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've reverted this, since we generally describe conspiracy sources, described as such by academic sources, as conspiracy theories and not as an "idea positing future Jewish domination of Poland" (continuing with a description of the basis of this "idea"). Icewhiz (talk) 13:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: Shadows the the protocols, this [] says it ws not in fact published till 1911.Slatersteven (talk) 15:23, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   Julian Ursyn Niemcewicz, 

message: I don't think "sassy" is likely to be the correct translation in the phrase "informers and spies for the tsar, tightfisted hyenas and arrogant sassy people who oppress the Polish people". If there are any Polish-speakers passing through who can do better, it might be worth changing it. Boynamedsue (talk) 13:31, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, this translation is quote from the book (where it was translated). We don't edit quotes. I doubt anybody willing to read and translate Szcześniak . One of the meaning "sassy" is "impudent, disrespectful".  I don't think anybody reading this piece with think "bold" or "cheeky" :-) Lembit Staan (talk) 20:07, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: "impudent" or "disrespectful" would be perfect! "sassy" seems too informal a word for the context. Apart from the register, it is generally used positively when referring to a personal characteristic (e.g. "She's a sassy, streetwise lawyer.") the negative use is normally restricted to specific contexts (e.g. "Don't get sassy with me!"). If the original is badly translated, you are right, there is not much we can do. Boynamedsue (talk) 07:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, yesterday I was lazy. Today I looked into the source and I see that in  fact the source does not cite/translate Szcześniak: the quote is of the ref cited, therefore I simply replaced the quote with rephrasing, with attribution. Lembit Staan (talk) 18:08, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, leaving it out solves the problem nicely, without losing anything from the message (which, of course, is probably a shame, given the nature of the message). I've put the hyena bit in quotes, as it's not an actual thing he's accusing them of, just simple racist rhetoric. Boynamedsue (talk) 21:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sassy?