lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Schaumburg High School

message: I think the Athletics section is getting out of hand; They are starting to list less than spectacular achievements, such as regional wins and sectional wins. --205.237.164.127 19:11, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Athletics

message: "Schaumburg High has not got the stuff
We move, we fight, we're not really tough
With victory not as our battle cry!
We'll go, we'll fight, we'll  die
Cheer the red, hail the gold
Come on, Saxons, let's blow!"
Someone has really good words.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.53.146.32 (talk) 04:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fight Song

message: I propose we include a section on The Christensen Program, as I recall reading a number of articles in the Daily Herald over the last few months.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twentysomethingteen (talk • contribs) 22:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Christensen Program 

message: I happen to know from personal knowledge that this page is often subject to vandalism. Perhaps low level protection should be considered.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjc979 (talk • contribs) 02:54, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Rock music in Puerto Rico

message: :Who rates these articles? All of the Puerto Rican articles I've seen, have been rated on "Low Importance", that is obviously false.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Garc1993 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Importance" 

message: This is a horrible example of translation drafting. This article is biased, inaccurate and irrelevant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.245.38.109 (talk) 00:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ==

message: I've added a Cleanup tag due to numerous links which should point to bands but instead point to unrelated articles.  I fixed some, but there appear to be quite a few. Nick Number (talk) 23:57, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  bad links
Talk:Rotylenchulus reniformis

message: The classification of Rotylenchulus reniformis adopted in the Taxobox, is from Koon-Hui Wang, University of Florida IFAS Extension and Geraert, Etienne (2006) Functional and detailed morphology of the Tylenchida (Nematoda) Brill, Leiden, .  An alternative classification is still within suborder Tylenchina, but instead of superfamily Tylenchoidea, places the Rotylenchulidae in the superfamily Hoplolaimoidea as a family.  The families in Tylenchoidea would be: Tylenchidae, Ecphyadophoridae, Atylenchidae, and Tylodoridae.  The families in Hoplolaimoidea would be: Hoplolaimidae, Rotylenchulidae, Nacobbidae, Meloidogynidae, and Heteroderidae. This version is at Australian Faunal Directory.--Bejnar 06:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification
Talk:Box Office Poison

message: The "Media Referenced in Box Office Poison" section might be interesting, but it's a bit unproffesional.  The last thing I want to do is start a flame war about the relevence of trivia on a page that probably doesn't get seen that often.  Can we at least move this section to the edit page?  That way, people who think this stuff is relevant can be happy with the fact that the info is there if people dig for it, but we would still be keeping the generally accepted opinion of what a Wiki page should look like in the article section.
Jmgariepy (talk) 09:50, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media Referenced in Box Office Poison 
Talk:Romance Dawn

message: The number of images in the article is starting to get a tad bit excessive in places. We should try eliminating several of them from the article. Additionally, several images are of poor quality, or could be reduced / cropped and still provide the same function:
*The shanks/grandfather scene comparison is nice, but the image could use a little work to have just those two segments and far less black space at the bottom (the caption is also needlessly long). Even better would be if someone went the extra mile and scanned in images directly from the manga, rather than using scanlations.
*The image of Spiel is huge, and showcases a name interpretation that appears to have come from the Chinese version. This one could be salvaged by cropping to just a head-and-shoulders shot.
*The title of Romance Dawn v.2 is from the Chinese version. This isn't necessarily a problem, but a shot from the original would be ideal if this images is to be kept.
--Julian Grybowski 06:43, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:List of impact structures in Australia

message: Is there any clever editor out there who could make a map showing all these locations?  I am interested to see their locations and distribution.81.159.88.183 (talk) 16:29, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: The issue with this list as given is relative to criteria that an outside of Australian authority gives to evidence - the Darwin crater - if the article is checked - is established and proved within the citeria of what constitues an impact crater - from the glass and the surveying done to date SatuSuro 07:08, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Claim to authority

message: In April 2013 I discovered the World's largest impact crater. The centre of, is in the middle of Australia (near Alice Springs) and the outside rim being the Pacific Rim. 
I have videos on YouTube showing prominent features of the discovery, and a blog on blogger with gps coordinates, descriptions,  theories and conclusions to many more features related to the event that caused the crater.
One day this will be common knowledge.  
All comments are welcome,
Cheers Steven Jeffs.  Steven Jeffs (talk) 06:59, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The World's largest impact crater.
Talk:List of impact structures in Europe

message: It would be nice if one could sort the table after increasing/decreasing age. Currently this is not possible--Jocme (talk) 09:51, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Todo: Allow sorting with respect to age 

message: The Zerelia craters and the Almiros craters are the same craters. Furthermore, the 250 m diameter is the size of the lake, not the size of the largest crater, according to this source: "The enigmatic Zerelia twin-lakes(Thessaly, Central Greece): two potential meteorite impact Craters by V. J. Dietrich1, E. Lagios2, E. Reusser1, V. Sakkas2, E. Gartzos3, and K. Kyriakopoulos4" and they are certainly "unconfirmed impact craters", so I removed the "Almiros" entry.
2.104.74.130 (talk) 09:59, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double entry? 
Talk:List of impact structures in North America

message: I just moved a bunch of craters back to the unconfirmed section.  An editor apparently was satisfied with them and decided they were confirmed.  But please note that the criteria stated on this page is that  "confirmed" is decided by the Earth Impact Database, not just any Wikipedia editor's whim.  Don't get impatient or hold your breath for them to accept any craters any time soon. 03:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Confirmed" is decided by [[Earth Impact Database]]

message: The current external link goes to an otherwise-empty page noting that the dB has moved to a new site, and has been RENAMED. The new site has a large global map of all confirmed & suspected impacts in JPG format, XLS, & GoogleEarth KMZ, all free to download. http://impacts.rajmon.cz/ Steve8394 (talk) 19:43, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earth Impact Database has moved 

message: Since when is an Indian burial mound considered an impact crater?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:6D44:C000:81E5:8A66:86E0:E567 (talk) 04:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serpent Mound in Ohio 
Talk:The Avengers

message: Suggest moving Avengers (comics) to Avengers and The Avengers (TV series) to The Avengers (and this dab page to Avengers (disambiguation)). -- JHunterJ (talk) 16:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary topics 

message: Re this edit: WP:MOSDAB: "In many cases, the title of the article alone will be sufficient and no additional description is necessary."
Re this edit: The movie's alternate title is ambiguous with "The Avengers". Ambiguous entries are disambiguated in the main list; they are not listed in "See also". See MOS:DABSY. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:40, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I consider myself to be fairly laid back and open to criticism. But with all due respect, there is no point in being such a Nazi, with disambiguation pages that I have edited, considering that we share the goal of trying to improve them...In the future, I would appreciate a little more tact, by explaining how my good faith edits are incorrect, rather than providing links on talk pages to discourage someone, just because my editing style does not match your personal criteria. Fortdj33 (talk) 18:34, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition to the personal attack, you have mistaken the guidelines for my personal criteria. I would also appreciate a lot more tact. -- JHunterJ (talk) 20:32, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I apologize for the misunderstanding. The above reply was just an elaborate way of me asking you to lighten up, but I took it personally, because you decided to specifically point out edits of mine on the talk page. It was not my intention to offend anyone, and I have no excuse for doing the same thing that I was accusing you of doing. I hope that in the future, we can both comment on the article's content, without referring to any contributors in an insulting or disparaging way. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:47, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

text: I realize that someone might type in "The Avengers" and actually be looking  for The Day Will Dawn, but the redirected link just conceals the actual title of the linked article, which defeats the purpose of listing it on a disambiguation page. And as a rule, piping or redirects should not be used in disambiguation pages, in order to make it clear to the reader which article is being suggested. I understand that there are exceptions, but with all due respect, I think that you are bordering on ownership of this article, by insisting that the link be displayed the way that you like it. Fortdj33 (talk) 03:23, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Others as well. Please read WP:MOSDAB#Where redirecting may be appropriate, which says "Linking to a redirect can also be helpful when the redirect contains the disambiguated term and could serve as an alternative name for the target article". -- JHunterJ (talk) 10:34, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, wouldn't it be more WP:OWN for you to insist that the link be displayed the way that only you like it? I'd include the diffs, but that may seem tactless. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:14, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Styling
File talk:Mission Street (San Francisco Mission District).JPG

message: This photo is not Mission Street.  My best guess is that it is 24th st (at Lucky).  I removed it from the Mission District page due to this inaccuracy. Will.law 07:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was taken at 24th and Lucky area; you are correct. I mislabeled it. —User:Christopher Mann McKay 08:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Mission Street
Template talk:Road infrastructure in Sydney

message: The Sydney Orbital Network has been operational since March 2007 - It should have a seperate section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.168.57.62 (talk • contribs) 07:30, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Section

message: Where is Metroad 8? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 58.168.57.62 (talk) 07:31, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no Metroad 8 - it was reserved for the Westlink M7, but when that got built it replaced Metroad 7 instead. However, when the system becomes alphanumeric, Metroad 10 will become route A8. JRG 22:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metroad 8
Talk:Kiss 105-108

message: We here your great tunes each day on the school run and im still tuned in whilst doing the boring chores about the house .your presenters are fab they always cheer me up in the cold winter mornings thankyou kind regards tracy riley.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.236.136 (talk) 00:08, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:   great sounds
Talk:Campeche

message: I have removed the claim that Campeche has a border with Belize.  I have seen a few maps (usually of low resolution and rather sloppily made) which seem to depict this, but maps in good detailed atlases confirm that the north/south borderline of Campeche and Q.R. is somewhat west of the n/s borderline of Belize & Guatemala.  Quintana Roo is the only Mexican state with a border to Belize. -- Infrogmation (talk) 19:42, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest looking at this INEGI map of Campeche, which shows the boundary with Belize clearly.  You could also consult Google Maps; or, look at the INEGI page giving basic data on Campeche. Spacepotato (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hm. If that's so, then the border between Campeche and Q.R. has been changed since the 1970s. Interesting.  It would be good to know when and how it was moved. -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  A quick search turned up Ongoing Borderline Disputes in Southeast Mexico, 2006 article on land and boundary is disputed by the states! -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

text:  Already mentioned (without details) at List of territorial disputes. I've come across some other online articles mentioning this (which has generated a good deal of friction in some of the towns in the disputed area) but no additional substantial details not in the above external link. -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :There is no official state flag, according to the state constitution, chapter 2, art. 5.. Spacepotato (talk) 20:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag

message: Should this article have a flag inside the infobox? There is a discussion about it at WikiProject Mexico, where you can join and discuss it. (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox flag RFC
Talk:John Moore Robinson

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 12:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment

message: I started this article to help flesh out some of the Okanagan articles, but despite the gaps in the article, I think I've exhausted the internet as a source of info on Mr Robinson, although if he was an MLA I'm sure there's more about him elsewhere. So, if anyone has access to published info on his early life and death, etc, that would be great. It probably won't be me though. Pics would be great too. --Yahoo!Sirius 19:09, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still to do 
Talk:Historical reenactment in Australia

message: Its an article on Living history in Australia, and details the various groups and time periods that living history in Australia covers.
This is an activity that 100's of people in Australia are active in, and is also involved in Anzac day activities.
There is a already a general living history Page, this one is Australia specific. There is no producst or service being spammed or advertised. Deathlibrarian 07:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: can you please add our site to your site. New England Colonial Living History Group. Armidale. NSW Australia. http://woodsrunnersdiary.blogspot.com regards, 122.129.34.21 (talk) 08:41, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  living history page 

message: I think the article needs a lot more references, and aspects of it read like an add, particularly for the events. Would be good to see references for the starting years for some of the groups too. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:37, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs more References
Talk:5-12

message: Why is this page a virtual rip-off of the page "Karachi Riots" listed at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karachi_Riots?  That page was created before this one, and it seems that for some bizarre reason, the author of this article has plagiarised substantial amounts of content from one to the other. Mohsin.Siddiqui 07:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Your World with Neil Cavuto

message: I've decided to add to the POV tag, I do not think the critism section is very fair. Some of is unsourced, some of it seems very opionated and irrevelent. How does that fact that one guest sells an expensive news letter make his credentials 'questionable', who thinks the companies he recommends are 'questionable', and who thinks  that some of the guests on the show are 'questionable'. Also, some of the things, such as having 'experts' in quotation marks seems slightly biased, i'd rather the section was changed to something like 'reception' with both postive comments and negative comments about the show. I don't think Newshounds is a good source for infomation, as it's sole purpose is to critise Fox News. --IvanKnight69 07:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Terms such as 'questionable' conflict with WP:WTA and WP:AWW Antonrojo 16:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Tag 

message: The gate issue about it being opened by border agent vs Tx Gd is probably due to it being PRIVATE property. 66.68.126.197 (talk) 20:25, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  News story re border gate opening
Talk:College of Business Administration (Saudi Arabia)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to College of Business Administration (Saudi Arabia). Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 21:18, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: College of Business Administration (CBA) →  – Not convinced this needs a disambiguation. If it does need one, then the correct disambiguation is College of Business Administration (Saudi Arabia) * Pppery * it has begun... 02:05, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 November 2022
Talk:The Winnipeg Tribune

message: Added a reference to the documentary, "The Trib: The Story of an Underdog Newspaper". Jimj wpg (talk) 20:06, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  'The Trib' Documentary (2012) 

message: ISSNs were first introduced in 1975. I guess Southam Newspapers didn't apply for an ISSN number for The Tribune, because doing an ISSN search (https://portal.issn.org/advancedsearch?search_id=2723566) comes up with nothing. Jimj wpg (talk) 00:52, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: ISSN
Talk:List of islands of Estonia

message: Prangli is 23 km2, but it's not in that list. Pelmeen10 (talk) 15:36, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Most sources still say Prangli's area to be somwhere around 6.4 km², which seems to be pretty logical if you watch the map for example. Flying Saucer (talk) 12:03, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest islands
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Neuroscience/Contributors

message: Lets all start doing some work on project neuroscience!!!!! Countryroad 08:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently there are two categories, 'Expert Status' and 'PhD Student'. Are these the only people allowed to list themselves as contributors? Is there a category for laymen who are neither expert (not sure how you get that status, lol) or a PhD student? Mostly in terms of minor contributions, link updating, sorting, designing and stuff. I notice you were not listed Countryroad and if you are working you should totally get listed :) Tyciol (talk) 04:36, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contributors

message: The way the page is set up, as mentioned by Tyciol, doesn't encourage membership by those who aren't experts or PHD students.  I'm removing that setup and switching to a more simple one.  I'll also remove those categories so that others will feel more welcome to contribute. Chupper (talk) 17:21, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reformatting page

message: In an attempt to make this page more useful, I have gone through the list of editors and removed those who both (a) signed up more than a year ago, and (b) haven't edited a neuroscience-related article in the past two years; or (c) no longer have Wikipedia accounts.  If you feel that a particular entry should not have been removed, don't bother to argue about it, please -- just re-add it. Looie496 (talk) 18:15, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up
Talk:International Islamic Fiqh Academy

message: I have gone in and added some information about the institutional fatwas issued by the IIFA. It might make sense to reorganize this page and structure by all of the institutional fatwas in order (64 is about bioethics, 65 is about pediatrics ethics, etc.)(source?), but I have done it here by topic matter.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurenekirk (talk • contribs) 02:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions About Medical Ethics 

message: IIFA is not a Saudi educational institute. It is rather an OIC subsidiary organ similar to UN agencies, which works as an international Fiqh council under the OIC's auspices and has 57 Member states. This new edition is based on reliable and various sources added in the reference list. Its content is not copy-pasted text; it was written to enrich the Wikipedia content. Let's cooperate!
The correct title of the IIFA should not include Jeddah because it is not part of its official name. The title of this article will be edited by removing ", Jeddah" at the end. 
The resolutions of the Academy do not deal predominantly with medical topics. Those who can read Arabic or can download the English version can clearly see that they are diverse topics. Any claim needs to quote the source. This is why I added a link to the resolutions of the Academy.
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Lardjane (talk • contribs) 14:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Correction of IIFA status and name
Talk:Bomberman Live

message: Can someone post the multiplayer gameplay description? JAF1970 16:29, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's Bomberman... the muliplayer is blowing each other up. Besides that, Bomberman Live has no single player mode, so the multiplayer gameplay is all that's being described. The closest to single player you get is playing with computers. --Phred Levi (talk) 22:22, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiplayer

message: According to this interview with the games' developer, the two games are identical (except for the number of players). I suggest merging the two articles and renaming the resulting article to something like Bomberman Live/Ultra. Obviously, as Bomberman Live currently has the most information, it would be that article that would be kept and altered. Opinions? ChimpanzeeUK - User | Talk | Contribs 13:12, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Bomberman Ultra]] 
Talk:Joe Kennaway

message: According to Douglas Lamming's Scottish Soccer Internationalists Who's Who book, Kennaway represented 3 counties internationally. He states Kennaway also played for the USA, vs Canada in 1930, although I've not seen this claim anywhere else. Can anyone confirm if he did this and if he is unique as a triple international? Caledonian Place 08:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:San Luis Potosí

message: Should this article have a flag inside the infobox? There is a discussion about it at WikiProject Mexico, where you can join and discuss it. (CC) Tbhotch™ 20:37, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox flag RFC