lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1925 NFL Championship controversy

message: Apparently this link () is  broken.
--Ahabvader (talk) 01:02, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Citation has been modified to link to the copy on archive.org. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:56, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken link

message: So the Green Bay Packers finished 8-5-1, the Yellow Jackets finished 13-8, and the other records remains a secret?-- Matthead  Discuß   13:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What records? 

message: Is there anyone still alive that watched this season in person?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.23.129.201 (talk) 23:54, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does that matter?--108.16.230.212 (talk) 07:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  OMG! 
Talk:List of action heroes/Archive 1

message: He's a genetically enhanced super-human, which goes against the article's description of an Action Hero. Should he really be there?
:I don't know anything about this charater, "Master Chief", but if he really is genetically engineered then no, he should not be in the article. On the other hand, why isn't Batman included? The only things that qualify him for "superhero" status are his custome and his apperance in DC Comics publications. Everything else says action hero, as he has no supernatural powers whatsoever. --Peter Knutsen 01:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Master Chief?''' 

message: Buffy the Vampire Slayer movie Resident Evil Apocalypse are listed. According to the article's own definition, they do not quality. Buffy gains supernatural powers such ncreased durabillity and healing, also sensing vampires. In RE, the heroine has been genetically altered to give her abillities faaaaar and above Olympic level fighters. Lots42 22:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Female Action Heros 

message: This article is unsourced. The definition of an "action hero" in the introduction is not supported by external sources and should be removed unless sources are added. Also, this page is really a list and should be moved to the title, "List of action heroes." -Classicfilms 15:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I rewrote the introduction, removing all information which was unsourced. Restore if sources are provided. -Classicfilms 17:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Since this is a list rather than an article, I moved it to "List of action heroes." -Classicfilms 19:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes needed

message: This information from the introduction is unsubstantiated by references. Please do not restore until it is sourced. -Classicfilms 05:29, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I should clarify that I have never come across a definition of "action hero" that defines it in the manner below. Scholarship often uses the term interchangeably with "superhero." "Martial arts" films frequently verge on the fantastic, and films such as "Harry Potter" or "Lord of the Rings" often involve action. Before restoring, we would need to justify the below with scholarship of some kind. -Classicfilms 05:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced
Talk:Imperatritsa Mariya-class battleship

message: The text mentions that turrets of the Imperatritsa Mariya were salvaged and two of the guns were used in Battery 30 (fort Maxim Gorky 1) in Sevastopol. I don't know about the guns themselves -- and why the original guns of the fort should have been replaced -- but what is captioned as a photo of the said guns here and in the article on the fort itself clearly shows that the turret was not the Imperatritsa Mariya's angular 3-barrel turret but the standard round 2-barrel turret used in fortress emplacements. Though the turret is badly destroyed, the cutouts for high-angle fire are clearly visible in the sloped roof. Naval turrets did not have such cutouts and the roof was straight.--Death Bredon (talk) 21:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't say that the turrets were used in Battery 30; the guns were removed from the ship's turrets after they were salvaged and used in the Battery while I presume that the turrets were ultimately scrapped.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:22, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not say you did, I just noted that the turret is not the same. But the question remains, why would the Russians have replaced the guns of one fortress turret (out of two) with the Impreratritsa Maria's guns? The original fortress turret guns had not seen any actual battle use during WW1 and would not have been worn out at that stage. One might also note that while the original two-gun turrets of Maxim Gorky were destroyed during the German siege in WW2, the fortress has since been reconstructed with three-gun naval turrets.--Death Bredon (talk) 20:27, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maxim Gorky 1 guns
Talk:Europe first

message: As always its the Forgotten Army! Where is the mention of the limitation on the resources allocated to the Burma campaign (even lower down the pecking order than the Pacific theatres, in particular the cancellation of amphibious operations? -- PBS (talk) 13:56, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Forgotten Army 
Template talk:Virgin Group

message: Just wondering, since Virgin Group has 20% stakes in AirAsia X, should the link of AirAsia X be included in the template? --Zack2007 06:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure all the companies on this page have Virgin Group holding the controlling stock, so no, I don't think AirAsia X should be included. NcSchu(Talk) 13:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually, I was wrong, so I've gone ahead and added it. NcSchu(Talk) 13:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was about to say that Virgin Group's share in Virgin Blue is only 25%. I am not for or against AirAsia X's presence in the template, just curious on whats the criteria to be put in the box. I guess 20% shares are substantial shares, even though its not called "Virgin", as some of the companies under Virgin Group do not have the word Virgin either. --Zack2007  —Preceding comment was added at 13:52, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that's why I agreed that it should be added.  It's on the Virgin Group page and even though it doesn't have the Virgin name and 20 or 25% isn't a majority holding we've kept companies on the list that have been completely sold off from Virgin so there was really no reason to not include it. NcSchu(Talk) 14:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AirAsia X in Virgin Group

message: Since mid-last year, two of the Virgin-branded radio stations in Thailand, owned by BEC Tero Radio, Virgin Hitz 95.5 and Virgin Star, now rebranded as Hitz955 and Star FM, removing any Virgin branding from the station. Should this be updated?
Source (in Thai): http://becteroradio.com/news/9/34930/
 --2403:6200:89A6:1DC4:59F0:D64B:5E4B:12 (talk) 08:51, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thai radio stations
Talk:One M&T Plaza

message: This should be combined with  as they are both about the same building. -  Sir Isto (talk) 14:22, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate Articles 
Talk:Electric Tower

message: Hi, I'd like to offer a photo of an old postcard, possibly from 1898 (on the back of the postcard) of the Electric Tower. 
Would someone be willing to add it to this article?
Thank you,
Debra Lorenzo
Debram8556@yahoo.com Debram8556 (talk) 18:18, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a postcard of the Electric Tower from 1898 possibly
Talk:Jon Costas

message: Some of the text on this page was later used elsewhere, including in campaign literature.  The original article and many of the revisions are original text written for wikipedia in complicance with wikipedia's guidelines to be neutral and encyclopedic.  Please do not delete any substantial portions of text because of copyright concerns without first discussing it here.  ЗдРиАн джонс (talk) 11:08, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of text on this page

message: Just a notice, there are a goodly number of dead links in the footnotes. I've no time to chase them down. TMLutas (talk) 06:44, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead links 

message: I believe the last section, including language "pimp out," could be improved in terms of neutrality.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.9.106.37 (talk) 03:07, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Dispute 
Talk:Diesel Electric railmotor (VR)

message: If anyone has access to the citations used in the article (or other sources too), do they refer to this particular type of railmotor as “Diesel Electric Rail Motor”, “Diesel Electric Railmotor”, or its current name or something else? Also, as per the other Victorian Railways train articles, shouldn’t VR be fully expanded and/or put at the front of the article title? Fork99 (talk) 06:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Also consider the name of DRC railcar which is another VR train regarding its abbreviation/capitalisation. Fork99 (talk) 06:34, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I also don’t believe that the names without the disambiguator “(VR)” are taken by any other article. Fork99 (talk) 06:36, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Fork99, This one should be "Petrol/Diesel Electric Rail Motor". Originally built as a Petrol Electric Rail Motor (PERM), later converted to a Diesel Electric Rail Motor (DERM). They are commonly know in Victoria by the term DERM's. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 06:52, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The other one is a Diesel Rail Car (DRC). Commonly know in Victoria as just DRC's. -- ThylacineHunter (talk) 06:55, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Dubai Marriott Harbour Hotel & Suites

message: I beleive that the name "Emirates Marina Serviced Apartments & Spa" is incorrect.  According to the official website, the name is "Emirates Marina Hotel and Residence."  I would like to change the name of the article, but first I would like to inform people of this change.  --Leitmanp 19:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the name.  I hope that there was no opposition.  If you believe that it should have remained as "Emirates Marina Hotel and Residence," please add a response.  Thank you.  --Leitmanp 07:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Here is the source:   Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 06:45, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 
Talk:Twentieth Century Motor Car Corporation

message: what does this have to do with the article? We don't say in Microsoft that Bill Gates is 5'4" and 110lb (He probably isn't but just an example). So I've removed this. Also what does her being a transsexual person have to do with anything. WP:BLP anyone? (yeah she has died but in 2004 making her recently died.) —Alison (Crazytales) (talk) 19:23, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Because she used her changed identity to keep on scamming people and not being recognized? --93.221.208.131 (talk) 22:21, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carmichael's height and weight 

message: Per WP:COMMONNAME this article should really be under the title "Dale (automobile)" rather than "Twentieth Century Motor Car Corporation". The Dale automobile is far better known than the shell corporation behind it. Marshall Stax (talk) 22:55, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of article
Talk:The Solid Mandala

message: Started review of this page, going to be working on it in the next couple of weeks. Any other help by anyone is also appreciated. Simpy (talk) 16:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Novel

message: Austlit lists the first two editions of this novel as follows:
1. New York (City), New York (State), United States of America (USA) : Viking, 1966.  
Extent: 309p. 
Reprinted: 1973 
Notes: Published February 1966. 
 
2. London, England : Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1966.  
Extent: 317p. 
Notes: Published 12 May 1966 
The current infobox lists the second of these are the first edition.  Looks like some investigation might be required. --Perry Middlemiss (talk) 22:03, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First edition
Talk:Haumea (mythology)

message: Pele and Pere were listed as two different daughters, so I deleted Pere and fact tagged the whole thing. kwami (talk) 04:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pele vs. Pere 

message: In Talk:Haumea (dwarf planet)#Pronounciation is an ongoing discussion about the pronounciation. A user who is learning Hawaiian language and culture suggests that /haʊˈmeːə/ or /haʊˈmeːa/ would be closest to the true Hawaiian pronounciation while /eia/ or /eja/ is only used by English-speaking people who for some reason won't or couldn't pronounce /ea/. He says that Hawaiian is fairly phonetic, i.e. the latin letters used for transcription closely reproduce the phonetic transcription (as it is often the case for German). Therefore there is no reason for the "j". However, in case of the dwarf planet Haumea the (English/American-dominated) astronomical society prefers the more English-like pronounciation with the additional diphtonge. Any other opinions?--SiriusB (talk) 12:17, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In wiki-en, all pronunciations are English unless stated otherwise. The name of a DP should be English, though possibly with the original afterwards. As for Hawaiian, there is an automatic epenthetic [j] between front vowels (i, e) and non-front vowels (a, o, u). It's just not written. Yes, Hawaiian is fairly phonetic, but not truly phonetic. It is, however, truly phonemic, AFAIK, and the phonemic transcription would be , not *. (Not unless we've misspelled the name and it's really Haumēa.) Check out Hawaiian phonology. kwami (talk) 18:36, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation?
Talk:Silanol

message: I suggest that this article would be far more useful to readers if it focused on the silanol functional group.  According to a search of "silanol" in Chemical Abstracts (reviews only, 1980-), all the main hits are to silanols in chromatography or surface science.  According to a major review (Advances in Inorganic Chemistry Volume 42, 1995, Pages 147–262   "The Synthesis and Structure of Organosilanols" Paul D. Lickiss), the compounds SiH4-x(OH)x are "far too unstable towards condensation reactions to be isolated and structurally characterized"  We all appreciate articles on theoretically interesting species, but in this case, the great majority of readers are probably not seeking insights into H3Si(OH), but into the functional group.  In the proposed revision, we could have a section on the parent silanols SiH4-x(OH)x, giving their CAS#.  Suggestions and critiques welcome!--Smokefoot (talk) 15:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Smokefoot and support this change, someone searching for "silanol" is much more likely looking for silanol functional groups than for specifically H3SiOH.  So long as the compound is mentioned (and it is), devoting most of the article to the FG is eminently sensible.  Thanks for making the change.  EdChem (talk) 15:12, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Should we add the Gold Book definitions somewhere? --Leyo 00:26, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Recommend move to functional group

message: The article currently includes the following: "For Et3SiOH, the pKa is estimated at 13.6 vs. 19 for tert-butyl alcohol."  This sentence is offered in support of the assertion that silanols are generally more acidic than their related alcohols.  The problem is that the silanol related to tert-butanol is trimethylsilanol and not triethylsilanol.  I suggest either the pKa for 3-ethyl-3-pentanol (Et3COH) be provided instead of that for tert-butanol or the silanol be changed to trimethylsilanol, so that a direct comparison is not complicated by differences in the carbon skeleton.  Thoughts?  EdChem (talk) 15:09, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triethylsilanol
Talk:KMRO

message: Generally, stations which do nothing more than rebroadcast the flagship station (like KMRO) do not warrent their own articles unless there is significant notable information present about history, ownership changes, etc.  KSDO, KGZO, KEZY, KEYQ and KLTX should me merged into KMRO.--Rtphokie (talk) 00:46, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Creatinine clearance

message: So, if creatitine clearance is above 1, is that good or bad? If it is below 1, is that good or bad?
Creatinine clearance (CrCl) is measured in mL/min.  The number you are referring to is serum creatinine (SCr).  If your SCr is <1 this is generally good (at least as a reflection of your kidney function).  If you plug that into the formula for calculating CrCl you will get a number that usually ranges from 0 - 100+.
Your kidneys are usually considered to be working well so long as your CrCl is >60ml/min.  Once you start getting below this threshold you will probably be referred to as having moderate renal dysfunction, but this doesn't really translate into much of a day to day problem. Until your CrCl gets below 20-30.  Once you start getting below 20, dialysis may not be far away.
However, there are many parameters which can cause your SCr to be falsely elevated (body builders with lots of muscle and dehydration to name a few.
Regardless of this, if your SCr startes getting above 1.5 or even higher this can mean trouble for your kidneys.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.153.57.100 (talk) 23:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bushy-tailed woodrat

message: The article doesn't even speculate on the critters behavioural quirks utility if any. Do we know why it will drum its hind feet, and do we know why it collects shiny objects? Do the woodrats with the most "bling" attract woodrats of the opposing gender, or will a really really hungry woodrat find something shiny and go to a woodrat with food? Or is there some shiny mineral that is beneficial in maintaining its nest chemically?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.181.254.50 (talk) 10:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we know? 

message: :  (Merged rejected)
The articles for Bushy-tailed Woodrat and Pack rat appear to describe the same animal, and have significant overlap in information. I have added a suggested merge tag. Chimpex 12:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Strong oppose: Pack rat is an introduction to the whole Neotoma genus, whereas the article here is about the species Neotoma cinerea as opposed to the twenty-odd other species (the infobox of the target article is clear about that). That's why the article here says that it is the "original pack rat", and that's why some overlapping is to be expected. — Komusou talk @ 18:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Strong oppose per arguments of Komusou.  --Aranae (talk) 18:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  20 days and no sign of the originator, I closed the proposal and removed the merge tags from the two articles. (Note that people who propose merges are *supposed* to watch them and close them...) — Komusou talk @ 20:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merge 

message: Are they legal in Portland Oregon 2601:1C2:5200:F8E0:C08A:BFFD:205C:D149 (talk) 04:32, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bushy Tail Woodrats
Talk:Danzhu

message: See  and . Badagnani (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Robert Frodeman

message: This page was made by professor Frodeman himself, making it not NPOV and autobiographical. Also, there's nothing establishing his significance. Smeggysmeg 07:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: --Malcolmxl5 08:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I think this thing is supposed to go here instead of the main page
Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. Robert Frodeman (talk) 14:15, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protectionor whatever 

message: Is Frodeman actually WP:Notable? -Roxy  the grumpy dog. wooF 14:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: His former position would indicate he is. However, other than material written BY him, there's no evidence his career was noticed by anyone else. Cabayi (talk) 13:13, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

text: There are plenty of articles on Jstor which he authored himself, but beyond that I've never heard of the gentleman personally. Wolf-013 (talk) 21:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced since 2007.
Talk:Kongbap

message: It's quite true that kongbap is usually not found on the menus of Korean restaurants, either in South Korea or overseas. North Korea I'm not sure about. Badagnani (talk) 04:35, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Restaurants
File talk:Wow-psp-cover.jpg

message: First of all, this image is not a redundant copy of :Image:Worms - Open Warfare Coverart.jpg, anyone can see it's not the same image.
Reason given by Salavat: (reverting cover change, original and better format (PNG), non-cryptic title)
First: Both images are JPG, why Salavat thinks it's PNG I don't know. Neither is it more original than this one. Second: The title has nothing to do with it whatsoever, since the image is only intended for use in one single article and thus don't have to be "user-firendly". Third: The other image is unnecessarily large, this one is much more effectively compressed with practically no loss in quality and higher resolution, which gives more detail for less bytes. --MrStalker talk 13:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion contested
Talk:Sayed Mustafa Kazemi

message: Here is all the spellings I found for his name:
* Sayd Mustafa Kazemi
* Sayed Mustafa Kazemi
* Sayeed Mustafa Kazemi
* Sayyed Mustafa Kazemi
* Seyed Mustafa Kazemi
* Seyed Mustafa Kazemi
* Seyyed Mustafa Kazemi
* Syed Mustafa Kazemi
in published sources. Some redirects might be in order. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 10:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of topic name
Talk:Julia Evangeline Brooks

message: I think there has been a typo perpetuated in some of the source material, but don't have the book you have used. Sources conflict as to whether her later career (as assistant principal) was at Dunbar High School in Washington, DC or Danbury High School (the only Danbury I know is in CT).  The material also says that she was active in the Washington, DC chapter of AKA, which suggests she stayed there all her life, as does her involvement in her nephews' and nieces' lives. I vote for most of her career at Dunbar High School, a prestigious historically black school in the public school system.--Parkwells (talk) 18:23, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunbar or Danbury High School?
Talk:Louis Lasagna

message: Just curious, is his last named pronounced lasagna, like the Italian dish?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.169.223.135 (talk) 21:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1995 UEFA Cup Winners' Cup final

message: The player positions give Arsenal's tactic to be 5-3-2, whereas the football pitch model renders a 4-4-2 formation. Which one is correct? Geschichte (talk) 21:32, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arsenal tactics?