lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/FeloniousMonk

message: Feloniousmonk
* Does not understand policy (he did not understand the foundation issues at our last interaction). 
* Is incapable of resolving disputes on his own. 
*:He has one or more old standing disputes open at this point in time, which he typically spams widely across talkpages. 
Feloniousmonk therefore fails my basic admin criteria. Further:
* Feloniousmonk considers rules first, encyclopedia second.
* Feloniousmonk has been known to "bite the newbies". 
* Together with others he caused such a huge mess in disrupting the last arbcom elections, that Jimbo is seriously considering never holding another arbcom election again.
These are some of the reasons why I oppose.
Kim Bruning 12:07, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Kim? You know I respect you, but I have to ask: WHY THE HELL did you make a new subsection for your feelings?--Tznkai 15:24, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Erm... that's not ok? *kerblink* Kim Bruning 15:34, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not so much not ok as a bit over the top. Why not just put it under your own vote?--Tznkai 15:49, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Dunno, that's a lot of lines to put under a vote. Feel free to do it if you like, though. Kim Bruning 15:56, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: reasons for opposition
Wikipedia talk:Wiki-Acquired Psychological Syndrome

message: no speedy deletion please
i think this might grow to a better article. It makes some sense. Effeietsanders 21:32, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides, speedy deletion would be rather ironic, no?  On a serious note, anyone care if I disambig WAPS, which currently redirects here?  WAPS is also a radio station in Akron, Ohio; somehow, I think more people would want information on that radio station than on this "syndrome". -- SwissCelt 16:49, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Disambiguation pages are mostly for the article namespace. There's no point having one to point only to a non-existent page and a page in the Wikipedia namespace. Angela. 15:05, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:C. K. Nayudu

message: This revert seems to have undone some valid grammar fixes made by ; I suggest sorting through and reinstating the undoubtedly useful part of the edits and discussing any oher parts that may have been contentious. Jayen466 23:48, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: We do not include information about many/all of a person's descendants.  That is not related to their biography.  Furthermore, none of that information was sourced, so it cannot remain in the article even if people think it's relevant.  Please do not re-add without a source and without justifying what it has to do with this article. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:46, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information about descendants removed 
Talk:Advanced Stream Redirector

message: I think this article should be renamed "Windows Media Metafile", as described in this MS article. Microsoft seem to refer to it more widely as this now, encorporating some other file extensions (.wmx, .wvx, .wax). --Jeffthejiff | Talk 18:43, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows Media Metafile 

message: It's a long time since I encountered this format (1997-ish). Is it still relevant, or has it been entirely replaced by others? Andy Dingley (talk) 17:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How relevant is this format in 2008? 

message: When this format was first announced, it (and also CDF) was "XML-like" but not entirely compatible with well-formed XML syntax. In particular it was insensitive to case of element names, but was sensitive to the attribute delimiter character (") but not (') AFAIR. Does anyone remember more, did they ever fix this with later versions, and does anyone have WP:RS to support this? Thanks. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:26, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  XML compatibility
Talk:PEM

message: PEM is also used to refer to the encoding format used by Privacy Enhanced Mail and defined in RFC 1421. This format is also used for representing keys and signatures in openssl (and possibly in other contexts).
I don't know if there should be a separate line for "PEM format" or the existing line for "Privacy-Enhanced Electronic Mail" should be changed to read "Privacy Enhanced (Electronic) Mail and the data encoding format it uses"
(Incidentally, RFC 1421 uses "PEM" as an acronym for "Privacy Enhanced Mail" not "Privacy-enhanced Electonic Mail".)
:I have gone ahead and restored the dab page, splitting off this article under its proper name, "Parallel Economic Model". It evidently was dumped into the dab page by a newbie, who didn't know what they were doing. The new article is completely unreferenced, so I have flagged it as such, and also flagged it as a stub. I will leave the article to fend for itself, but it is a candidate for deletion if it is not improved. Reify-tech (talk) 15:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled (proposed restoration of disambiguation page)
Talk:BS 7799

message: I removed the link to a standards purchase site, standardsdirect.org. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#StandardsDirect.org for more about this site. As I see it, Wikipedia is not a directory and we're not here to help people sell things. Most of these standardsdirect.org links have been added by single purpose accounts who likely have a conflict of interest. See:
*Conflict of Interest Guideline
*What Wikipedia is Not Policy
*External Links Guideline
*Spam Guideline
If an established, high-volume editor wants to add it back to the article, by all means go ahead. Otherwise, it stays out pending resolution at the spam discussion link above. --A. B. (talk •  contribs)  00:42, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: StandardsDirect.org

message: I deprodded it because the rationale was that "BS 7799" was no longer a valid standard, it had been withdrawn. As Ancient Egypt no longer exists either, but we have an article about it, means that current standards are not the only thing covered on Wikipedia. 76.66.194.212 (talk) 06:26, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: PROD

message: not sure whether it actually needs a separate article or should just link to the history of ISO/IEC 27000-series or ISO/IEC 27001
BS7799 is important in many ways in developing the modern practice of Information Security and as the forerunner to ISO 17799 and subsequently the ISO 27000 series, its development is also quite interesting, as it came out of a UK government Code of Practice, and subsequently developed a theory around why that should be adopted.https://www.bcs.org/content-hub/the-importance-of-bs7799/
BS7799 Part 1 became Became ISO 17799 then ISO27002:2007, Part 2 became ISO27001 and part 3 became ISO 27005:2018https://www.pc-history.org/17799.htm 208.127.199.21 (talk) 14:51, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for article
Talk:Christopher Parker

message: "In a matter of weeks Parker confessed his homosexuality to the papers"
I don't remember this happening. As far as I remember, he never confirmed the rumours, and still insisted he was heterosexual. ~~~~ ( ! | ? | * ) 22:00, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been able to find a number of sites that said "it was well known in entertainment circles that he was gay", which seems to imply that it's now well-known everywhere - that he's confirmed he's gay. However, I am unable to find any articles which contain any information on him actually coming out. --Sanguinus 18:26, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Earth (American band)

message: I thought this was a live song and not a demo? Legend has it that Cobain slept through the whole live session except for that song --Nosmo 09:32, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Divine and Bright

message: I don't want to delete it immediately, but I'm not sure they're completely legit. Someone should check that out. Thanks. BTC 02:21, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The two most recent edits from that anonymous user.
Talk:Volkshalle

message: I changed the link in the first paragraph from "Nordic" > "Northern Europe" to < "Nordic Theory" because Hitler did not mean Skandinavia when referring to nordic but the "Nordic Race" in the way it is explained on the Wikipedia page "Nordic Theory". 87.187.41.218 (talk) 15:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nordic Theory

message: Was it to hold theatre or musical performances? Political or military rallies? Was it to be a museum dedicated to the Nazi movement and the war? What actual practical purpose was this great structure to serve in the Berlin of Yester-Tomorrow?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by D Boland (talk • contribs) 06:05, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was it actually for? 

message: A popular meme in the community around the Hearts of Iron IV mod "The New Order" is to spam the phrase "big building in Neu Berlin", a reference to the Volkshalle. However, typing in "big building in Neu Berlin" into google turns this article as a result. How? I don't see a mention of "Big building in Neu Berlin" in the article. ERBuermann (talk) 01:09, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article shows up when looking up a TNO meme. Why?
Category talk:House styles

message: I created this because Category:House types was serving two purposes, and it was getting convoluted.  House Types was originally (and is again) articles about the general types of houses, such as cottages, mansions, huts, etc.  This category is for the specific architectural styles of residential, single-family homes.  --W.marsh 22:18, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Black coral

message: Does anyone have any information on the cultural/historical uses of black coral? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.36.132.191 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cultural use

message: http://www.ansa.it/site/notizie/awnplus/english/news/2009-03-19_119350685.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.25.193.213 (talk) 10:03, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest forest found in Calabria

message: Reference 3 no longer exists and should be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darktangent (talk • contribs) 14:58, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Alternate (to the Graczyk AP news-article) Cesiumfrog (talk) 23:52, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 3 

message: In the Family section, the genus Aphanipathes should be classified in the section Family Aphanipathidae and not in the section Family Antipathidae. This can be confirm from information obtained from these two websites:
The Global Biodiversity Information Facility: GBIF Backbone Taxonomy, 2013-07-01. Accessed via http://www.gbif.org/species/2258118 on 2015-03-27
I recommend making this change and I will make the change unless someone objects.  MauriGirl14 (talk) 22:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the genus Aphanipathes to the section Family Aphanipathidae. However, I have noticed that there are some disagreement in the correct taxonomic classification of this genus. I will leave the genus Aphanipathes in the section Family Aphanipathidae though because the taxonomic information available at the two websites that I provided in my previous comment above are the most recently updated information that I was able to find. MauriGirl14 (talk) 22:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modification in Section Family 

message: I think that this article has gone past start-class. Hopefully, if it gets re-reviewed, it can go up to c-class. How do I nominate it to be re-reviewed?
Thanks! Aven Az13 (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Aven Az13, anyone (including you) can reassess the article by rating it compared to the criteria listed at WP:ASSESS. Additionally, some individual projects may have further requirements (eg. an image or infobox) at certain levels. I do agree with you that the article is certainly above a "start" level, perhaps even a B. 'Cheers, Loopy30 (talk) 21:05, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do I get this re-reviewed for status? 

message: I have rated the article as being C-class on all wikiprojects. Though it may be comprehensive enough and well-enough witten to warrant it being a B-class, I'm going to wait until we have more sources that are more reliable. Thanks, Loopy30. Aven 00:30, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reassessment of the article
Talk:Molten-salt reactor

message: currently redirects to this page but not to any section or anchor. I think we should do better than that. There is a little information at TerraPower, whose design this is, but that page needs updating too.
See 
* https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/southern-company-and-terrapower-prep-testing-molten-salt-reactor a secondary source
* https://www.terrapower.com/our-work/molten-chloride-fast-reactor-technology/ for the TerraPower page on the MCFR, it has been archived on the Wayback Machine but the graphics and relevant text seem to have been lost there somehow
It's an interesting design, maybe not so promising as their Natrium reactor but probably more so than their Traveling Wave Reactor. Andrewa (talk) 15:30, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Both MCFR and Natrium are fast neutron reactors. I see no advantage of molten sodium over molten salt, and one clear disadvantage - the flammability of sodium.  So I am favoring the MCFR, but I can't get any info from Terrapower for our article in Citizendium.  I think Terrapower may be following an under-the-radar strategy on public relations: We got our funding. Let's get our demo up and running before the anti-nukers take notice. David MacQuigg 14:25, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Molten Chloride Fast Reactor or MCFR
Talk:Poland/Archive 2

message: I think this part should be removed. Almost all of the links are to Polish-language sites and it is hardly beneficial to anyone without knowledge of Polish. Frequently, the links are poluted with spam.
Poszwa 01:35, 5 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The most popular Polish web-portals

message: Saying that between 1945 and 1989 was single-party state is just not true. It was tri-party system (pl:PZPR, pl:SD, pl:ZSL) in which PZPR had the main power. Three is certinly not one.
There were even more "satellite" parties (pl:PAX). Practically, it didn't matter since PZPR had guaranteed majority in Sejm. Moreover, Central Comittee of PZPR was de facto ruling the country regardless of constitutional institutions. On paper, pre-1989 Poland was a democratic country. In practice, it was an oligarchy ruled by the Central Comittee of PZPR.Poszwa 01:56, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  single-party state 

message: The economy section is partially plagiarised from the CIA factbook description of the polish economy. Don't know if that matters or anything. It can be found here https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/pl.html#Econ
: Tnx. We will definetly rewrite it ASAP. Copyvios are not allowed on Wiki. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 09:00, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The Factbook is in the public domain. -- Naive cynic 07:07, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economy
Talk:Peek's law

message: User:Light current added a different version.  I think it is for a wire inside a cylinder, though:
Ec/d =31.53 +9.63/sqr(dr)
where:
E is inception field strength for corona in kV/cm,
r in dia of inner conductor in cm
d is the relative air density defined by:
d=p*293/760(273+t) =0.386p/(273+t)
where p is pressure and t is temperature
it's actually the same thing with slightly different contants and 31.53*0.301~9.63  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dvd7587 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Another version?

message: The article is ambiguous in two ways which hamper its usefulness.  I found these when trying to work out a simple example.  I have three suggestions:
1) Say what the units of "r" are.  Not important in the logarithm ratio, but in the factor of r before it matters.
2) Clarify what is meant by "S".  Is this the separation of the nearest surfaces, or the separation of the centers of the wires from each other (or from the center of the geometry?)  Note that as the value of S/r falls through "1", the breakdown voltage becomes negative, which suggests to me that S is really 1/2 the distance between the wire centers, such that S=r corresponds to the wires just touching, giving a breakdown voltage of 0.
3) Work out a simple example.  A basic rule of thumb I have heard forever is 10 kV / inch for arc breakdown.  I'm surprised to see 30 kV / cm as the baseline for corona.  But 30 kV / cm would work if the units of r are cm; then a VDG with a 1 m diameter sphere upper electrode would be expected to corona at 30 kV / cm * 50 cm = 1.5 MV, which is about right.
Pqmos (talk) 20:26, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguities
Talk:Ælfgifu of Northampton

message: This really needs to be split into two pages, one for the wife of Ethelred and one for the mistress of Canute, since they were different and each the mother of an English King.  http://www.earlybritishkingdoms.com/adversaries/bios/aethelredunred.html suggests the first was the daughter of the Earl of Northumbria.  --Henrygb 23:29, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I tried editing this once, but I'll try here too.  First, though, I agree that there should be a separate page or entry for the principle women named Aelfgifu: Edwi's "wife", Edmund's wife, Aelfgifu of Northhampton, and Emma/Aelfgifu, wife of Aethelred and Cnute.
Second, the name Aelfgifu does NOT NOT NOT mean "noble gift."  It is a compound of "aelf", elf, and gifu, "gift", Elf Gift, not to be confused with another popular name of the period, Aethelgifu, which would be "noble gift."
:Emma of Normandy has a page.  But the distinction I see is between the 1st wife of Aethelred and the mistress of Canute. --Henrygb 22:32, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Does it matter at this point in the 11th century what her name actually means? I mean, my name means "man of red earth" or whatever in Hebrew but that's not really relevant now. Did they really think she was a gift from the elves? Adam Bishop 07:09, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Meaning 

message: The page devoted to Aelgifu contains references on it to Ael-F-gifu.  In other versions there appears to be Elgifu and Elfgifu.  Is the 'f' optional?  I know name spellings are hard to pin down from this period but it would seem to alter the meaning of the name if the 'f' is missed.  Would some scholar enlighten me, please? Tom Kirby 12:04, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of female names 

message: The image known as Stowe 944, does not depict Ælfgifu of Northampton. Instead, it depicts Emma of Normandy, who was also known as "Ælfgifu"; see Cross and Culture in Anglo-Norman England: Theology, Imagery, Devotion by John Munns (https://books.google.com/books?id=TicbDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA32&lpg=PA32&dq=winchester+cross+presented+to+%22new+minster%22&source=bl&ots=5SZBa3In-P&sig=kuRvqi9b08MJowxmBzsqPXbitxU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi8qcCytJ3VAhVCLSYKHchzBioQ6AEIVTAJ#v=onepage&q=winchester%20cross%20presented%20to%20%22new%20minster%22&f=false)
The British Library's catalogue (http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/onlineex/illmanus/stowmanucoll/c/011sto000000944u00006000.html) indicates that the Liber Vitae of New Minster (Winchester) begins with this image, dating it to 1031, when Ælfgifu of Northampton would have been overseas. 
I intend to move this illustration to the "Emma of Normandy" article (and of course, remove it from this page) during or after October 2017, unless there is a strong objection with proof that proves BL and Munns are wrong.
--LibertyHiller (talk) 17:45, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, good eye. The first plate of Timothy Bolton's 2017 Cnut the Great identifies the woman as Emma. So no objection from me.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 00:36, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration does not belong here
Talk:Ben Stack

message: the map is not in scotland
:I don't understand the question, re-type please!
::Possibly the OP did not realise that there is a link only to OS in general and not to the OS Landranger 9 which certainly covers Ben Stack. -- Klaus with K 19:10, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  ...and for a choice of on-line maps click the NC269423 link.  --Cavrdg 08:43, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I suspect the original poster was referring to this revision, which has a map of Britain, with a yellow dot to represent the Ben. Except the dot was in completely the wrong place, I'm not sure why. Vclaw 17:56, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pine barrens

message: Are these communities limited to North America?  Why aren't there any in Europe or Asia? --EncycloPetey 21:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know why not.  Maybe there weren't any, such as due to all the wood being harvested.  Maybe there they haven't been identified as being different from forest, or maybe they've been lost as most of the :Pre-Columbian savannas of North America have been lost.  If they're not burned every few years, in decades they become forest, and after two generations people forget they were there.  Or they've been converted to farmland.  If they exist they might be listed in :Tropical and subtropical grasslands, savannas, and shrublands.  -- SEWilco (talk) 03:11, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are indeed pine barrens in Europe, see http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moskog . Most of Finland consists of pine barrens. However, the species composition is naturally somewhat different.62.20.108.18 (talk) 09:40, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Extent
Talk:Transavia

message: Why not?
----
Transavia destinations is integrated in Transavia Airlines. BramvR 10:19, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Could someone confirm the current bases for Transavia aircraft?
A recent update from an anonymous user states "Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Brussels, Berlin, Copenhagen and lots of other bases." in the destinations section, the infobox merely states Amsterdam and Eindhoven and the seperate destinations article states Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Copenhagen and Paris-Orly. So what is it? The Transavia website is not clear about it. BabyNuke (talk) 22:00, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bases 

message: This article doesn't include the destinations of this company.197.0.154.142 (talk) 18:13, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transavia destinations 
Category talk:Rathfarnham

message: Is this category really necessary? None of the other places in the Towns and suburbs in Dublin have their own category. Tearlach 23:53, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly seems odd to have a category for Rathfarnham and not for any other Dublin suburbs.  No offence to readers from the 'nham, but it gives a misleading impression as to the importance of the suburb.  Unless we're proposing to do the same for all other Dublin villages and suburbs, I would favour deleting this category. --Ryano 12:22, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this category necessary?