Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Erie

message: I'm planning on going to the Boom on the Bay and taking photographs, but seriously, we need to write some articles on festivals. Celebrate Erie is a big one. At the minimum, we need to create List of Festivals in Erie, PA.--trey 20:41, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Boom, Bay, Festivals

message: I saw the wikiproject banner template at WP:FBI and liked it so I made an WP:ERIE version.  I wouldn't mind some other opinions on it or if you could try my version out and see if there are any bugs in design. Use this code →. It should work just like the current banner. ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 17:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks fine.—treyomg he's back 22:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its been implemented. ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 23:27, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banner change proposal 

message: What shall our next project/article to improve be? Also, I'd like to see an article on the Bayfront Connector.—treyomg he's back 22:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to see a Bayfront Connector article or even a Boston Store article, personally I'm trying to get Presque Isle State Park to GA status. ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 22:46, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I am going to start Portal:Erie—treyomg he's back 00:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just let us make sure that it won't end up like Portal:Lancaster, Pennsylvania, out-dated and abandoned. Also, if you don't mind, I'm going to move it to Portal:Erie, Pennsylvania. ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 00:49, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Me likes Portal:Erie better. I dont think it will ever end up like Portal Lancaster, Pennsyvania, unless we both die or something. —treyomg he's back 02:35, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully not. Do you think there is a record for the time it took to create a portal? Because I think it's been broken. ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 02:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: lol. Next stop WP:FP. :P —treyomg he's back 02:42, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Next Stop?

message: Wanted to see if anyone else feels Furhman's is notable enough for an article, and whether anyone wants to collaborate on writing one. This may be just a bout of recentism though. --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​​talk•contribs 17:21, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cider Mill 

message: Presque Isle State Park in Erie County is the most visited state park in Pennsylvania, and is a Featured Article Candidate. It is labeled with the WikiProject Erie tag. If you want to weigh in on the nomination, it is here Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Presque Isle State Park. Thanks for any feedback! Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 14:05, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured Article Candidate 

message: The way that the Erie Phil and Erie Playhouse articles are laid out, there isn't much opportunity to mention the fact that Henry B. Vincent got the Playhouse running before WWI and resurrected the Phil in 1920. Someone might want to write an article about him. Here's the text of the brief bio on Vincent contained in the 1993 "Erie Philharmonic 80th Anniversary" souvenir program, in case someone wants to run with it.
"Henry B. Vincent (1920-1926) Member of a prominent Erie family, he graduated from Oberlin Conservatory and continued his musical studies abroad. For 20 years he served as organist at the Chautauqua Institution. Among his composing credits were an oratorio, opera and operetta. Locally Vincent established the Erie Playhouse, formed and conducted the Erie Choral Society, and directed the Community Opera Company. He helped revive the Symphony in 1920 and was its conductor for six years."  
The brochure contains photos and brief biographies of each conductor in a two-page spread called Podium Profiles. The brochure also outlines the history of the Phil in a three-page article called Celebrating the Past. I bought the brochure at a local used book store and will try to update the history, but the bios are too brief to permit individual bio articles in Wiki with their limited details. Maybe someone else could take on the conductor bios for the earliest ones, probably starting with Vincent? --Pat (talk) 04:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If Vincent is not currently living maybe the library would have his obiturary on record (that might provide some more info). ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 03:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I found the obituary. Have you read it? I could send you send you a copy? ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 02:06, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry B. Vincent 

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 22:57, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Erie 

message: Anyone want to write an article explaining why North East, Pennsylvania is in northwest Pennsylvania?  Pustelnik (talk) 01:21, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll check a book that I know has an answer at the library tomorrow. ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 02:00, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've placed the name origin into the article but, alas, it is not as interesting as I had hoped. ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 18:16, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: North East, Pennsylvania

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:22, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: I have a request of the project. Right now, the highways in Pennsylvania (under project WP:Pennsylvania Roads), and well, it is almost dead. We need help expanding over 350 stubs, and it would be very helpful, as some of the more important stuff needs help too. If you could possibly give input, ping me on my talk, or post here. Thanks.3 1/2 years of Mitch32 10:21, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  PA Roads needs help 

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:16, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Erie articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 22:25, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erie articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: I have started a conversation here about the possibility of combining some of the United States related WikiProject Banners into . If you have any comments, questions or suggestions please take a moment and let me know. --Kumioko (talk) 19:45, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A consideration for cross project consolidation of talk page templates

message: Casliber recently posted a suggestion on the talk page for WikiProject United States about getting the US Wikipedians Collaboration page going again in an effort to build up articles for GA through FA class. See Wikipedia:U.S. Wikipedians' notice board/USCOTM. After several days of work from him the page is up and ready for action. A few candidates have already been added for you to vote on or you can submit one using the directions provided. If you are looking for inspiration here is a link to the most commonly viewed articles currently under the scope of Wikiproject United States. There are tons of good articles in the various US related projects as well so feel free to submit any article relating to US topics (not just those under the scope of WPUS). This noticeboard is intended for ‘’’All’’’ editors working on US subjects, not just those under WPUS.
The next item I intend to start updating is Portal:United States if anyone is interested in helping. Again this is not specific to WPUS and any help would be greatly appreciated to maximize visibility of US topics. The foundation has already been established its just a matter of updating the content with some new images, biographies and articles. Please let leave a comment on the Portals talk page or let me know if you have any questions or ideas. --Kumioko (talk) 19:08, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: US Collaboration reactivated & [[Portal:United States]] starting next

message: Please reassess.  Currently rated as "start" when I think it rates a GA.  But as its primary author, not for me to say.  Substantially rewritten, sourced, linked (internal and external) restructured since last assessment.   7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I reassessed to B, to obtain GA you'd have to nominate the article at WP:GAN. By the way, there is a somewhat confusing statement in your article (or at least to me it is). You should clarify where US 19 is called Perry Highway, because in Erie County PA 505 and a short segment of PA 97 are called Perry Highway (and US 19 is Peach Street). ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 18:11, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Oliver Hazard Perry]]

message: Why do you find it necessary to cut out large sections of this article?  This is for magicians that want to look up articles of other famous magicians.  Kellar was very famous and needs to have a large section intact for posterity.  If there is a reason to make a change, then stated it so it can be discussed, but everything in this article was researched and verified in magic books so I don't understand why it is taken out.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.104.60.57 (talk) 17:30, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Harry Kellar

message: I would love to participate on this! Is there any formal application, per-sey? I have added the "badge" to my Talk page, but want to make sure that I am not just some 'poser' :)
Thank you!
Idoitfor (talk) 14:45, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I have started 2 Erie-related articles. Erie Business Center (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Erie_Business_Center), Marquette Savings (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marquette_Savings_Bank) (APPROVED), and St. Vincent's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_Vincent_Health_System
EBC's page is nearing completion (although having a hard time to get past the approval phase), and Marquette is a work in progress. I invite you all to take a look, and contribute what you can!
Regards,
Idoitfor (talk) 21:29, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Creation

message: Template:Infobox PAhistoric has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. CrazyPaco (talk) 15:30, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|Nomination for deletion]] of [[Template:Infobox PAhistoric]] 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject United States - 50,000 Challenge 

message: The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.
Portals are being redesigned.
The new design features are being applied to existing portals.
At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template .
The discussion about this can be found here.
Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass.  Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.
=== Background ===
On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject collaboration notice from the [[WP:WPPORT|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace.  On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.
There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.
So far, 84 editors have joined.
If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.
If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.
Thank you.     — The Transhumanist    07:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out! 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources