Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines/Assessment

message: The Philippine Oriole seems to have enough information by far to qualify for being a start-class article. Please help improve it to ensure quality in the important part of Philippine History... Thank you! --Hoverflew0909 (talk) 11:32, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please re-rate this page...

message: Did you know that you can run your own JavaScripts to enhance your Wikipedia experience? There are tons of scripts available, such as adding a [0] tab at the top to edit just section 0 (so you can edit introductory paragraphs without loading the whole article into the edit box).
There is one very useful script for assessment tagging: The article assessment script initially created by User:Outriggr.
Installation. Just copy the following code to this page Special:Mypage/monobook.js (if you're using the Monobook skin, which is the default):
 // 
 importScript('User:Seav/+assessment.js'); // Tambayan copy via the GFDL from [[User:Outriggr]]
 assessmentMyTemplateCode = ["{{WPPhilippines|class=|importance=}}"];
 assessmentDefaultProject = "WPPhilippines";
 // 
The code is preloaded with the WPPhilippines template (you can add other WikiProjects if you want). Then save the page and do a browser force-reload to clear the cache (usually Shift-refresh or Ctrl-refresh).
Usage. Browse to any article page (not article talk page) and you will see drop down boxes at the top of the article. Select the desired importance level (or leave it unchanged) from the right drop-down box, then click on the desired quality value. This will bring you to the edit page of the article's talk page. Check the preview, ignore the "session is lost" warning, then save. Ta-da! You have successfully tagged an article just by using a mouse! :-)
--seav 23:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Easier tagging via Monobook.js

message: Anyone feel free to fix stuff. I'm absolutely clueless with this stuff though. I do believe that if we get this going, we could jump-start more wikiaction with the members of the tambayan who don't really have any specific interests in mind and just want to latch onto stuff that needs fixing. Shrumster 18:06, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Help needed

message: So, top 500 right? The absolutely must-have for a paperbound PI edition. And Boracay is one of those? Its a tiny island thats rather dingy with a horrible infrastructure. It's importance is only in the way the government pushes it for tourism and that it, amazingly, got on a yahoo and AskMen top 10 list once upon a time. As far as the rest of the PI goes, its pretty decent. But compared to any other resort areas in the tropics, its quite a dump. The entire island still looses power. And this is a 'must-have'? Just asking.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.5.75.10 (talk) 07:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because you don't think Boracay is all that interesting to you doesn't justify that the article is given a Low rating on the importance scale. Boracay is one of the top tourist destinations in the country and the fact that the Department of Tourism has dubbed it "the prime destination in the Philippines and it is positioned as a sun-beach and holiday destination" means that the island is important despite any misgivings you have about the crass commercialism that pervades the place. The fact that the government think it's important and that numerous travel websites have referenced it (e.g. Yahoo!) clearly shows that there is enough interest in the subject of the article to give it importance as well in Wikipedia. At the very least it should be at the High importance rating, but you marking it for the Low rating just shows your own personal opinion. --seav (talk) 11:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Boracay

message: Hi. I checked the list of articles with no importance category, and noticed most of them are either OPM albums (I dispatched those right quick and classified them Low), and LGUs from Masbate. How do we importance-classify LGUs again? Alternativity 06:56, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ergh-hem. Following up my Question po... are there particular rules for Regions Provinces Cities Towns and Commercial centers unless they have some additional cause for interest (Boracay, for example?) Alternativity (talk) 05:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's my rule of thumb basing on the 500-top, 2000-high, 10000-mid article counts: all current regions, about a third of provinces, and selected cities are top; the rest of the provinces, several more cities (especially those created before 2000), and some towns (like Puerto Galera) are high, the rest of the cities and towns are mid; barangays are low. --seav (talk) 06:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Didn't we decide that the encyclopedicness (what a word) of Barangays is in question? So I suppose if we have an article on a barangay at all it would probably be there not as a barangay but as a notable place of its own and therefore outside the traditional rule of thumb? Barangay Ayala Alabang for example? (Just clarifying... not looking for an argument. Hehe.)Alternativity (talk) 08:53, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unassessed Importance 

message: I made a script to collect a whole bunch of potentially unassessed Philippine-related articles. I did this by checking out which articles categorized under categories within 10 levels of :Category:Philippines (ignoring the obviously non-Philippine-related categories like :Category:World War II) are still unassessed. I got a total of about 6,800 still unassessed articles. Interestingly, I found out that there are about 9,100 possibly Philippine-related articles currently existing. (My estimate was about 5,000. Hehehe.) The worklist is transcluded below. Hopefully we can finish this worklist by November end. Enjoy tagging and assessing! --seav 06:34, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment department worklist 

message: I took this article from Stub to C Class, but have added a lot since then. I wish to request another assessment. I have a 1964 photo of Fertig to upload but I have never done that and haven't really studied the instructions yet.  Thomas R. Fasulo (talk) 02:19, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wendell Fertig 

message: Could this article be independently assessed to see if it matches GA standards please?  Gubernatoria (talk) 00:39, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think it meets the GA criteria, you should ask as WP:GAC. But personally, the article is in need of major re-organization. The laundry list of eruptive activity doesn't seem appropriate. --seav (talk) 02:26, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mayon Volcano

message: I promoted this article from Start to B class, if that's alright with everyone. I believe the article is well-written, provides comprehensive information, and follows good citation. Needsmorehotsauce (talk) 01:06, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh wait, I just noticed that this assessment thing appears to have been inactive for quite some time now. =/ Needsmorehotsauce (talk) 03:21, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Antonio Trillanes IV

message: I would like to request for a reassessment of the article Progressive Party (Philippines). The article has been significantly revised since its last assessment. The Mask (talk) 13:24, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for reassessment

message: The article about Olongapo has been significantly improved and updated.
The current rating is Start-Class and Mid-importance Thank you! --War1addict (talk) 09:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please re-assess Olongapo City's article 

message: Request for assessment for The Voice of the Philippines and The Voice of the Philippines (season 1). Thanks!-- 19:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for assessment for ''The Voice of the Philippines''

message: Please protect the wiki page of Legazpi City as so many important details have been deleted over and over again, despite being supported by citations and references. Thank you.103.14.62.233 (talk) 03:07, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legazpi City's page under vandalism. 

message: Dear editors, the Naga, Camarines Sur page is under persistent vandalism and must be helped out. Important data are being deleted even with sources and references. Please help the page to become sustainable, balanced, and free of will. 
Thank You  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.14.63.241 (talk) 01:05, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naga City's page under vandalism 

message: Requesting reassessment of Teresa Magbanua. I have made substantial improvements to the article and added appropriate sources. If anyone knows of any tagalog-language sources that could be used in the article, please add them; the article could also use a photo of her. PaintedCarpet (talk) 18:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teresa Magbanua 

message: Dear Editors, please reassess the quality scale of the article Science and technology in the Philippines since it has been improved over the last few days. Thank you. GreenPH (talk) 13:14, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reassessment of Science and technology in the Philippines 

message: Request for reassessment of the quality scale of Zamboanga International Airport. It has already been improved and may be relisted from its current quality scale of Start Class. Thank you. GreenPH (talk) 06:06, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reassessment of Zamboanga International Airport 

message: I disagree with articles John Ensign and John Ensign scandal being tagged for the Philippine project, and especially being given "Mid-importance". Yes, he was a US Senator claiming his 1/8 Filipino ancestry. But, he never met his paternal Filipino-German grandfather, his father abandoned him and his mother when he was 4, and he did not grow up in a family culture of Filipino or Asian-American influence. He didn't learn about this ancestry until he was about 40, and used it on the campaign trail. At the same time, in 2008 he voted against increasing federal benefits to Filipino veterans in the Philippines who had fought with the US during WWII. No one tagged this for an Italian-American project, but that was his mother's ancestry and she raised him.Parkwells (talk) 17:59, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Object to Tagging and assessment of articles related to US Senator John Ensign

message: Hi. I'd like to request a re-assessment of Laguna (province). I've tried to expand on the article as much as I could, and while I think there are so many things that still need to be improved, I feel that a re-assessment could help bring other people in to help. Much appreciated, guys. NyanThousand (talk) 13:05, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laguna (province) 

message: Hi, I would like to have an article assessed: Museo de Intramuros. I would also like to have a re-assessment on University of the Philippines Manila, which I have been working on lately. By re-assessing the article, I feel that it will help on improving it. Much appreciated, and thank you in advance. PH 0447 (talk) 18:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museo de Intramuros and University of the Philippines Manila 

message: Hi, I'd like to ask for a re-evaluation of the Isabelo de los Reyes page. I have a book about him and I added what I could based on it, and I sorted out the page since it was kind of hard to follow at the time. Much appreciated if somebody could give pointers on how to further improve the page. Thanks! NyanThousand (talk) 07:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isabelo de los Reyes 

message: Hello! I am new to contributing to Wikipedia (12 days). I was wondering why the article I created Eugenio Daza was assessed as Low-importance? When the example Tambayan Philippines provides for Mid-Level importance is Korina Sanchez a leading journalist. In contrast, Eugenio Daza was the commander during the  Balangiga Encounter, has a provincial holiday as a war hero recognized by 5 presidents, helped establish peace in Samar postwar, was a member of the First Philippine Legislature and has aNHCP Historical Marker Historical Marker for being a "Filipino Hero". SanLeone (talk) 04:33, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Reassessment Eugenio Daza

message: The Baybayin page has experienced a great amount of improvements the past 2 months, in structure, depth, quality of sources and reliability. I would like to request a reassessment. Glennznl (talk) 15:09, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reassessment of [[Baybayin]] 

message: Hello, I'd like to ask for an assessment of Fidel Agcaoili. Not a lot of sources readily available about his life aside from tributes, but I think I managed a fair shake. Would like help on how to improve the article too. Thanks. NyanThousand (talk) 04:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment of Fidel Agcaoili 

message: I have created a wikipedia article for Trisha Bonoan-David. WikiCentral24Talk 02:18, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Trisha Bonoan-David]] 

message: Request reassessment for 1990 Mindanao revolt, significantly expanded since last assessment in 2022 Borgenland (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1990 Mindanao revolt 

message: Request reassessment for Justiniano Montano, significantly expanded a few days ago  from a stub since last assessment in 2010. Borgenland (talk) 16:17, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justiniano Montano 

message: Request reassessment for Melecio Arranz, significantly expanded last month from a stub since last assessment in April 2023. Borgenland (talk) 09:52, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melecio Arranz 

message: Request assessment for Amando Doronila. Newly-created article about a veteran Filipino journalist. Borgenland (talk) 12:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amando Doronila 

message: Request reassessment of God Save the Queen Plot. I have serious reservations that the Start-class label does not accurately reflect the work and information that editors, including yours truly, have made in creating and expanding this article. Borgenland (talk) 14:34, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reassess God Save the Queen Plot 

message: Request reassessment for Hotel Delfino siege. Added some more info since last assessment in April. Borgenland (talk) 14:51, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hotel Delfino Siege 

message: Request reassessment for Mohammad Ali Dimaporo. Added additional info since last assessment in June. Borgenland (talk) 14:55, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ali Dimaporo 

message: Can an article creator designate their articles as part of the Tambayan tag in the talk page or does it have to be marked by other editors? Borgenland (talk) 13:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I would usually put the tag but with the Class and Importance fields blank so other editors may scrutinize it. Ganmatthew (talk • contribs) 14:01, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Will start finding relevant articles too. Borgenland (talk) 02:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessments 

message: Request reassessment for Cherry Hills subdivision landslide. Added additional info since last assessment in 2009. Borgenland (talk) 02:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cherry Hills landslide 

message: Sorry for flooding again but I'd like a reassessment of Miguel Purugganan which has been significantly expanded since last assessment in 2019, Leonardo B. Perez and Hadji Butu, which were newly added to the project. Borgenland (talk) 03:39, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographies 

message: Please rate the Philippines, BongBong Marcos and Durterte.            Ned1a Wanna talk?  17:26, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. Those articles are already assessed and their current assessment looks justifiable. Sanglahi86 (talk) 08:29, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles needed to be rated