Talk:Super League

message: Please add www.rugbyleaguetoday.co.uk as another link on Super League (EUROPE) as it is the a great rugby league community website on the internet. Thankyou Webmaster.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rugbyleaguetoday (talk • contribs) 01:04, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link

message: The template should include St Helens RFC - instead of linking to St Helens disambiguation page.  Please can someone change this?  I can't work out how to do it myself.  CarolGray 18:40, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: Since the 2006 and 2007 seasons have their own articles, shall we merge the content about them on this article into those, and just keep this one about the Super League organisation/competition itself?--Jeff79 18:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds like a good suggestion.GordyB 18:54, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season Summaries 

message: If Super League directs you to this article (and rightly so), why do we still have the "(Europe)" in its name? Was making this article the primary topic for Super League discussed and voted on? Or is someone likely to come along and try to change it to the disambiguation page?--Jeff79 (talk) 07:11, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the most commonly thought of meaning of the term. In Australia and New Zealand it is often described as the English Super League or British Super League due to the Super League War down under around a decade ago. The product is known as Super League with often the title sponsor Engage in front of it. I guess with teams from Wales and France it is a European Super League, but officially Super League is the name. Maybe a move to that with a link to the disambiguation page at the top.Londo06 09:41, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I still don't know why this article is named Super League (Europe) when Super League directs to it anyway. The "(Europe)" disambiguator is not needed right? There's a link to Super League (disambiguation) at the top. Has this not been discussed already elsewhere? Surely it has.--Jeff79 (talk) 10:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Would it be possible to correct the geographic location of Crusaders Rugby League club who are still incorrectly shown on the maps in the Super League and Super League XV articles as based in Bridgend as opposed to Wrexham where they are now based (although of course the present map can be retained for posterity in the Super League XIV article)?Wrh1973 (talk) 18:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Position of Crusaders RLFC on map 

message: Interesting document I came across on me travels:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmselect/cmcumeds/99/99ap06.htm
I think sections from this would be good to incorporate into the history of prehistory of the development of Super League. Reasons why the League decided to make these radcial changes seem very important and I can't see them mentioned.
On a similar subject, in my opinion the opening statement of the History section needs to be changed. It is obviously someone's original research and opinion, and uses no sources to back it up. It may be fair to say those things but it needs proof to back it up, or it needs changing. I looked and those statements have been there since the formation of this page with no evidence. I'm no fan of Murdoch but it reads with a very biased tone of voice. I believe looking at the Super League war page may be a good starting point, although this is obviously more about Australia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaleeyed (talk • contribs) 16:33, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development of Super League 

message: The chart with the team names, colors, stadia etc. has the Broncos' unchanged from the Quins'. I am not sure how to, but the little box should probably be sky and black now. 119.149.12.118 (talk) 13:08, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Club Colors 

message: When the super league started, many of the clubs adopted nicknames into their official names e.g. Leeds Rinos, Halifax Blue Sox. Is it known why this happened? and if to do with the super league, can it be included in the article. Thankyou. Op47 (talk) 19:28, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicknames 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:51, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: For the highest attendance part of the infobox on the individual seasons page, I think we should exclude the Grand Final / Magic Weekend as they are special cases and will always attract higher attendances that the regular season matchs.
Thoughts? Mn1548 (talk) 10:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highest Attendance 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :European super league. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 22#European super league until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Robofish (talk) 22:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "European super league" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Is there any reason why this is at 200? Is there a special prize for this amount of games managed? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 18:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coaches to have coached at least 200 Super League games 

message: Can we get an up to date version of the Super League logo for the info box. Current one is the old logo Northern Wonder (talk) 09:05, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super League logo 

message: St Helens and Bradford were declared champions as they were league leaders in the absence of a Grand Final. THEY WERE STILL LEAGUE LEADERS!!! Don't removed this information from the "champions table" as it is correct and factaul. Further, don't replace it with "N/A". "N/A" means not applicable, the league leader for Super League I and II is applicable as there was a league. "N/A" is used correctly in the score column as there was no Grand Final for there to be a score for, which is all explained in the note. Having "N/A" in the league leaders column is misleading, false, contradicts the note in the score column about how the champions were determined for the first two season, and prevents the display of the league leaders of those two seasons. Mn1548 (talk) 15:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I’d argue that the League Leaders column is irrelevant for SL I and II as the first past the post system meant the team finishing top were Champions. The league leaders column is only relevant when a Grand Final was played Northern Wonder (talk) 20:47, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thing is that teams finishing first in SL I and II were Champions AS WELL AS League Leaders. I'd understand it if we extended the "N/A" to 2002, due to the fact the shield wasn't awarded until 2003, but if we are including seasons prior to this it should go all the way back to 1996. At the end of the day the teams that were achieved this in season I and II ACHIEVED BOTH, they just happened to be the same thing at the time. Regarding relevance, league leaders in seasons I and II are as relevant as in all seasons until 2002 as neither of those teams got trophies. And Regardless of all this, saying a league leader is not applicable for I and II implies there was not a league to be a leader of, which is factually incorrect. Mn1548 (talk) 19:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The list should be those awarded the specific trophy only. Anything else is WP:OR. Same applies to League Leaders' Shield. Koncorde (talk) 10:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Rant: Super League I and II