Talk:Tactic (method)

message: I have submitted this article for deletion, as it is wholly worthless and should be rewritten by someone who can both write coherently and understands the topic. 67.72.98.93 11:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: That was me (I forgot to sign in when I nominated).  Articles like this will push some of us into Wiki-agnosticism; if one doesn't have faith in the Fundamental Theorem of Wikipedia, that is, that any moron with an Internet connection is entitled to have an opinion on any topic, then it's hard to keep orthodox.  I say this wholly without heat, by the way.  I like Wikipedia fine.  Not deleting articles this poor, though, shows that Wikipedia erroneously believes "freedom" to be synonymous with "absence of any kind of intellectual standards."  Don't be too mad at me; I don't believe in democracy either, as it happens. Dave1898 12:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  My deletion nomination 

message: I'm no scholar, so I haven't followed the recent usages closely, but I believe my copy edit preserves the intent of the editor who added the reference. Unless someone objects in the next few days, I'll remove the rewrite tag. BusterD 20:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The same is true in search and rescue and Incident Command System.  --Una Smith (talk) 16:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've attempted a re-write which does justice to the subject 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Tactic (method). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150812034306/http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict to http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/doddict/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:46, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: <<determined by the absence of a proper locus>> - what does this mean?
<<The space of a tactic is the space of the other>> - what does this mean (did it mean "tactic is IN the space of the other", if so what does that mean?), or does it mean something that can be expressed more simply? Without meaning I can't even tell if it's true.
<<A tactic is deployed “on and with a terrain imposed on it ...>> terrain literally (in which case it's wrong), or metaphorically, in which case it's just saying a tactic has constraints on it, which is to state the bleedin' obvious.
<<...and organized by the law of a foreign power.”>> - literally, then no as that just a special case, or metaphorically then it's just another way of saying constraints exist.
I could go on, but I think this is pompous crap that should be nuked from orbit. Opinions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.41.16.25 (talk) 12:14, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No opposition so I'm removing it. 80.41.23.233 (talk) 16:18, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  quote from Michel de Certeau makes little sense to me 

message: Response to third opinion request:
I removed this entry because the dispute is between more than two editors. Consider opening a thread at WP:DRN. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 14:12, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: WTF are you talking about? The dispute above is clearly between only two editors - Ilias48rus and MrOllie - to which I responded as a third party. Honestly, bloody desk jockeys on here are a joke... — Marcus(talk) 03:56, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion