Talk:Infill

message: These topics cover pretty much the same thing, and it seems an article on suburban infill should be part of one on the broader topic of infill. Signed - Joshua Davis (articnomad) 20:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We would then use loose the "building technique" (wattle and daub) sense. At least one of the "what links here" links is to this meaning. --Old Moonraker 18:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suburban Infill/Infill Merger

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: The urban consolidation article seems to describe the idea of infill development, but using United Kingdom terms and perspective.  Maybe that article should be merged into this one? Michael Patrick (talk) 21:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems sensible, but may I repeat my request (absent-minded typo now corrected) that the fate of the "building technique wattle and daub" be considered in disambiguation? It obviously doesn't belong.  --Old Moonraker (talk) 06:08, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  It doesn't look that is happening, so I added "Urban consolidation" as a "see also" reference, and removed "Infiltrate" as a "see also" reference, since nothing there currently pertains. Kortoso (talk) 17:58, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Urban consolidation]] 

message: I am working on this site as part of the public policy initiative and could use some help making the language wikipedia-appropriate.  I would appreciate any editing help! Irishmeadow (talk) 17:06, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: At the first use, put something like <ref name= Farris2001> instead of <ref>. For subsequent uses just write . Official version here. --Old Moonraker (talk) 20:14, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Thank you! Irishmeadow (talk) 04:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New User  

message: Examples that illustrate the concept are useful.  However, this article seems to have attracted a couple of adverts posing as examples.  The key element being that the sources cited are promotional and do not really discuss infill.  Please, if you are going to provide examples please only cite ones that have discussion in reliable secondary sources.  Citing blog postings, real estate promotional web cites and the like is not appropriate.  See :Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources.  On this basis, I have removed the examples of Chatham Square, in Alexandria, Virginia, added by IP editor 35.14.209.162 on 29 March 2012 and the Village of Ponderosa, West Des Moines, Iowa, added to the original Suburban infill article by UrbanMaster on 27 January 2007 (which was UrbanMaster's sole addition to Wikipedia).  There should be plenty of examples in published non-promotional reviews of infill projects that could be used. --Bejnar (talk) 19:18, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples: avoid advertising and promotion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Infill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320023034/http://www.sedev.org/downloads/GreenInfrastructureHandbook.pdf to http://www.sedev.org/downloads/GreenInfrastructureHandbook.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:57, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified