Talk:Kikuko Inoue

message: Is it worth wikilinking to the characters themselves (i.e. Belldandy) if they have pages of their own? Just a thought. --Yar Kramer 19:52, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they should be linked to justify notability, but just the first instance of it in a series. -AngusWOOF (talk) 17:30, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikilinks to characters

message: Don't worry about how the article looks right now. It will be all cleaned up and expanded in a couple days. (^_^) --nihon 04:55, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I made an edit but though you wouldnt mind. :) --Cool CatTalk|@ 19:20, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the edit. Hope you don't mind. (^_^) --nihon 00:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I actualy do mind. Delete crazed people will now target the image your edit orphaned. --Cool CatTalk|@ 05:32, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major edit

message: How about adding her trademark? --Cool CatTalk|@ 18:41, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. It's down with the external links. --日本穣 19:59, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kikuko Inoue's trademark

message: I removed two of the fair use images because they are not acceptable use under the current fair use policy (which specifically disallows images of living people which could resonably be replaced with a free image). I then moved the Sakura Taisen image to the top as it is acceptable fair use because it is not repeatable (see fair use rationale on image page). It's likely the trademark fish image will be removed at some point as well. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 08:08, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the current picture is a good example of her style.  MythSearchertalk 08:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use images removed

message: While this is not particularly taking the mickey on her, but it seems that she's the first one to refer her age as "17 years old + N days". (A section in the ja version explains that). Should we expand a section referring to this? (There's at least a source, but in other languages)--Blackhawk charlie2003 (talk) 12:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are now two references that explain this quirk. As for whether it's section-worthy, well, some formatting of that block of arbitrary facts would be nice. -moritheilTalk 17:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  17 yr old meme 

message: The article was vandalized by an IP by sneaking a false entry in the article.  I then realized the poor status of the article right now.  It got a very long lead, but no article body, and huge lengthy list of what she played but not much sources and is prone to vandalism like this particular one.  I propose a reorganization of the article by creating an actual body(that will be easy, move the current lead down as a body and write a short intro as the lead) and figure out a way to shorten the list to only notable verifiable titles,(thanks for SpecB's correcting me) preferably with at least one secondary source and one primary source for each entry. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearchertalk  02:49, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Define "notable title". My personal opinion is that - basically - every role of any actor, voice actor, etc. is notable. An objective listing contains even the most minor items. Otherwise, the idea is good, and I'll try to help however I can - for example, trying to look for references of the listed roles. SpecB (talk) 20:59, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, you are right, it is reasonable to include all titles, I might have termed it wrong.  I was thinking about if the title is correct, then it would be easy to find a primary source in her profile and a secondary source in the title's own cast list. (I can accept having only the latter)  I guess I should use the word verifiable instead of notable. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearchertalk  01:12, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, yes, "verifiable" sounds okay. :D SpecB (talk) 09:50, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we need to refer to the entries on her profile page, or is it enough if we read through it and match them with the corresponding titles/roles in this article? Same with the titles' own cast list. SpecB (talk) 19:35, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

text: Do we consider any kind of major site that is referred to in an anime's Wiki article, but is not officially related to it (eg. Anime News Network) a legit source of verification? SpecB (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

text: This page lists at least two magazines with info about her. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 20:11, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, those have article lists from the 1995/07 issue of Animage, Onee-chan's name appears in the title of an article about Osakana Pengin CD. SpecB (talk) 13:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

text: I just thought about something. There could a third, reliable source when it comes to verifying these roles, that being the ending sequence of the animes themselves. I mean, even if the anime role isn't listed on her profile page, nor there is a cast listing on the anime's website (if it even has one), the ending sequence will still contain her name - see the case of DearS as an example. I propose this as a reliable source of information. Any ideas? SpecB (talk) 13:53, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the ending sequence sounds reliable and could be reasonably used here. However, it might be a good idea to also list episode number to make sure it is easy to verify. (Avoiding possible vandalism faking a source by giving some really long anime that is hard to verify each episode's ED.) —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearchertalk  02:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That can work. But where would the episode numbers be listed? It would look silly in the listing itself, especially if the anime is fairly long, and she only appears irregurarly. How about starting a table here on the talk page at least for the ones that can only be verified by the endings, listing one or two episode numbers where the sequence contains her name. SpecB (talk) 11:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

text: Mmmkay, I now have tried to verify all TV Anime, OVA and Movie roles. A handful of TV animes, approx. half of the listed OVAs and - this might change - three movies are without any kind of verification. I'll make a table for them here today or tomorrow. SpecB (talk) 22:25, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry that I do not have any copies in hand so I cannot do the verification.  —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearchertalk  02:55, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganize? 

message: Yup, "Onē-chan" is indeed a good solution, but is that Hepburn romanization, or what? Just curious. Also, something else that puzzles me: "Looking at the Onegai Teacher link, I think One should be closer transliteration than Onee." What correlation did you find between "Onē-chan" and the Onegai Teacher link? SpecB (talk) 10:41, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, that is probably my fault then, when I made a mistake but forgot to come back and correct it.  I forgot the Japanese term does have the E in it and mistakenly thought it as the same as Onegai at the time, thus the edit comment.  However, the later edit from One to Onē is a Hepburn romanization and should be correct even with the mistake I made.(and that is pretty much why Onegai does not have the ē but only a e) Sorry for not clarifying this earlier. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearchertalk  01:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

text: The most common romanization is "Oneechan" (or "Onee-chan"). In fact, WP:MOS-JA indicates that's the correct romanization. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:11, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Onē-chan 

message: How about using  instead of , in order to be able to separate footnotes from references, as explained here? It would be needed for my idea of marking non-verified roles - the explanation would look out-of-place among references. SpecB (talk) 11:28, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there were no objections (well, so far), I made the proposed changes. SpecB (talk) 01:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You can use  to do that, too. For example, . See the template documentation if you have any questions. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, yes, I see. I was looking for something like that, I guess I must have missed it or something. SpecB (talk) 10:22, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't know about it until I looked to see if something like it was available when I suggested it here. We all learn something new every day. :) ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 10:57, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References and Notes 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kikuko Inoue. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070629103407/http://manbow.ponycanyon.co.jp/profile/index.html to http://manbow.ponycanyon.co.jp/profile/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified