lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Parallel mesh generation

message: In my opinion, this article is oriented in such a way as to reference mostly articles from Nikos Chrisochoides whose contribution to the subject is, in my opinion, very limited, especially when compared to the quantity of similar if not identical self-referencing papers that he has produced on the subject. I would not be surprised at all if the author of this page was himself or one his PhD student. 2A02:A020:42:269A:1:0:FFB0:688C (talk) 15:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subjectivity of this page
Talk:Our Lady of Lourdes School, Arnos Grove

message: Below is an interesting piece of information I have saved from the article. Unfortunately, I can not find any reliable sources for it. If anybody else can find a source, please feel free to put the sentence back into the article, along with the source.
Although always thought to provide a very happy educational and working environment, 6 members of staff left their various teaching and supporting posts in the summer of 2007.
(6 is a significant proportion of the staff at the school). Dark-Fire 16:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Staff leaving

message: Head Girl: Courtney Daniella Boateng Smith
Head Boy: Albert Collyer  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.215.211.44 (talk) 10:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, such information is not particularly useful, will go out of date quickly, and will be virtually impossible to find an appropriate source for. I think that information about when and why such positions were introduced, and how they are decided upon, would be more appropriate. Dark-Fire (talk) 11:17, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Head Girl and Head Boy
Talk:Galich, Russia

message: Usually in history also the name of the "Knjaz" is given. Or is he not known in Russian history? Or was he a half brother only, born by a Meri (Merja) woman. In the case of this ancient Meri settlement even this seems possible.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.187.107 (talk) 17:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Knjaz name was Константин Ярославич (Konstantin Yaroslavich). He's mentioned here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaroslav_II_of_Russia#Marriages_and_children --89.113.78.48 (talk) 08:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Who was the younger brother of Aleksandr Nevski?
Talk:Document Editor

message: "Document Editor" was not (and could not be) a brand or a proper product name. Xerox documentation seems to have referred to the document-editing component of integrated systems of the Alto and Star era as the "document editor". If it really is something that I couldn't find, it might deserve a sentence of two in some history of Alto, Star, Xerox, or Xerox PARC, but doesn't seem to merit a stub, especially with a generic name like "Document Editor". DCDuring 17:13, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The earliest WYSIWYG document editors were developed at Xerox PARC, and were called Bravo and Gypsy. The designation document editor is clearly generic, like window manager, as in this retrospective on the Xerox Star. I've redirected the page to Word processor.  --Lambiam 21:04, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This looks like a mistake
Talk:Rail transport in Iceland

message: Does anyone have a photograph of the Kárahnjúkar Light Railway? It is very recent history, so there must be pictures out there somewhere. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 21:08, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Further Photo

message: 1435mm gauge rail networks is proposed for Iceland.
Details of mainline railway networks in Iceland:
*Track gauge:  standard gauge
*Minimum radius: 150m
*Loading gauge: small (slightly smaller than British W6a)
*Routes:
:#Reykjavík - Borgarnes - Blönduós - Akureyri - Egilsstaðir - Höfn - Selfoss - Reykjavík
:#Reykjavík - Keflavík
*Maximum speed: 100-120km/h
*Right-/left hand running: Left-hand running
121.102.122.122 (talk) 10:29, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Nathan Hamilton

message: To closing admin: . This is likely the cause of the meatpuppetry/sockpuppetry on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Evil Spartan (talk • contribs)   
:These instances of sock/meat puppetry extend over a number of articles and have continued for at least four months. An investigation is underway. -Jmh123 19:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please post details of this 'investigation' thank you Dooor-Matt (talk) 20:41, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meatpuppetry confirmed
Talk:Gemmotherapy

message: The "npov" tag currently reads "The neutrality of this article is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (September 2011)" There is no such discussion on this talk page, and according to "View history" there never has been any such discussion here. I'm removing the tag for now; if whoever originally tagged the article wishes to return and discuss the basis for disputing the article's neutrality, please feel free to do so. --Shadow (talk) 22:04, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: After a quick look just now, I wouldn’t say neutrality is too much of an issue in the article’s current state, but still, it’s a very low quality, unbalanced alt med article. It could use some solid info from scientific sources. — TheHerbalGerbil(TALK|STALK), 20:41, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality disputed? 

message: "Gemmotherapy, like many other alternative therapies, lacks an evidential basis and is not accepted as an efficacious treatment by the scientific community.[1]" I am removing this citation as it appears to refer to a paper on gem therapy/crystal healing, which is completely unrelated to gemmotherapy. If there is an appropriate alternative citation, could someone please add it. Nick Churchill (talk) 11:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion with gem therapy
Talk:Global Gaming Expo

message: Recommend adding G2E as an article to jump to this one. ---Ransom (--71.4.51.150 17:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  G2E 

message: The word gaming is linked to the article gambling. Is this on purpose? The term 'gaming' is ambiguous. It could mean a number of different things (basketball, Monopoly, hide & seek, Dungeons and Dragons, tiddlywinks, marbles, hunting preserve upkeep, etc.). While the gambling industry may wish to use the term gaming to describe itself, we should probably use it only in specific names (such as 'Global Gaming Expo') and use the more specific term (gambling) when referring to the industry and the trade show's content. This applies to the American Gaming Association article too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.155.221.10 (talk) 23:02, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaming/Gambling: less ambiguous term should be preferred.
Talk:Ukrainian National Army

message: A military unit infobox may be used to summarize information about an individual military unit or formation, such as a regiment or division..
taken from 
UNA was an army not a unit or a division!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.249.84.140 (talk) 08:26, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: An army is a military unit. --Bogdan що? 09:15, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  to solve the problem :
Talk:Sam & Max Beyond Time and Space

message: Removed some speculation with no citation. --208.106.40.170 17:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Starting with episode 2 of this season, the game exe appears to be built with a new compiler or setting that imports (but does not use) a function call that is available only in the WinXP kernel and later. The forum post by the user Dachannien explains the issue succinctly. Another forum poster offered a patch that fixes this, but it was taken down by Telltale. Telltale is, however, offering refunds for this problem. The game does not list Win2k as a supported OS, but the first episode of this season and the entire Season One works just fine in Win2k. Thus this could be a surprise for some users. Ham Pastrami (talk) 23:20, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Win2k incompatible 

message: I don't know why the merger tags keep getting removed and then marked as vandalism. Sam and Max Season 1 was multiple articles, but it was decided that all the episode articles be merged into the main season article (as the individual episode articles were nothing more than trivia and plot summaries). As there is precedent and all the season 2 episode articles are nothing more than trivia and extended plot summaries, there should be a discussion in terms of doing the same for Season 2, hence the tags. Yet, for some reason, whenever the tags are added they are deleted and marked as vandalism.
And yes, as there are 5 episodes, there should be 5 tags. It's not vandalism because there are so many tags. It's an indication of the merging of 5 articles, some of which may prove notable that they don't need to be merged.
Unless someone can give a good reason why the tags should not be added, (and hence the discussion of merging not take place). I am going to put (at least some of) them back, and people marking legitimate Wiki tags and discussion as vandalism will be reported to an admin if they are removed without discussion. 24.190.34.219 (talk) 20:31, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The proposed mergal tags
Talk:Cantonalism

message: I think there should be a seperate article on Cantonalism
Cantonalism was basically an ultra-federalist ideology based on the division of a country in semi-independent democratic municipalities established by revolution. Thought it was a lower bourgeoisie movement, it found worker's support.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rcduggan (talk • contribs) 21:35, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Miller Park (North Omaha)

message: Not only does this article display blatant POV, but its description of the park is very far from reality.  Miller Park is notorious for drug and gang-related crime in the area. 24.252.50.236 07:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Citations, citations. Show us evidence that isn't simply your assertion, and then feel free to make appropriate contributions to the article. The only POV in the article is that which is written with citations, which makes it as valid a contribution as any other... • Freechild'sup? 08:22, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Emma Crosby

message: Due to the increasing number of people who are changing the date of birth of this person, I have inserted a note regarding changes. The only reference to a date of birth comes from imdb, which only gives a year, and these can sometimes be unreliable (though it's all there is for now). Please do not make changes unless there si a reliable third party source to back them up. Thank you TheRetroGuy (talk) 16:33, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 
Talk:Horticultural therapy

message: WHAT IS THE APPROXIMATION OF HOW MANY TIME HAS THIS ACTIVITY OCCURRED?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.100.193 (talk) 23:23, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article, especially the "Programs" section does not cite many sources. It all seems a bit biased to me. Lena08041993 (talk) 09:36, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality of sources

message: Artyplantz and 183.82.19.72, who I am assuming are one and the same, please stop adding promotional information to the Credentials section (which would be the incorrect section even if your content was permitted). Also, without proper citations your added content is unverifiable. If you'd like to find a neutral way to add developments to the therapy, please discuss here.
DeniedClub❯❯❯ talk? 09:15, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional Information in credentials section 

message: This article overall is very well written and organized. The thing that stood out to me the most as a strength of the article would be the organization and categorization of the information over horticultural therapy, that made for an easy to read and understand informational article. Tmb211 (talk) 18:29, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation of article: What are the article's strengths? 

message: "How to become a horitcultural therapist" section is just straight up AHTA criteria, and oftentimes throughout AHTA are the only people referred to. Undoubtedly they are experts on Horticultural Therapy, however what other organisations if any may oversee/implement it outside of AHTA (especially outside of the US, for instance, in the UK, Canada, Australia, etc.), or is horticultural therapy unique to the US/AHTA? 
This page is about horticultural therapy, not AHTA, so making it less AHTA-centric may be ideal (and the "how to become a horticultural therapist" section may be better to be heavily reworded or removed, wikipedia is not an instruction manual or AHTA training page!) 2A01:388:505:150:0:0:1:37 (talk) 22:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the section. It looks like this article has been primarily put together by students for assignments, so that explains part of the poor organization of the article. The whole thing really needs a rework. KoA (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very AHTA-centric 

message: I removed the following:
An extensive systematic review with meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of horticultural therapy. A significant positive association with gardening was observed for a wide range of health outcomes, such as reductions in depression and anxiety symptoms, stress, mood disturbance, and BMI, as well as increases in quality of life, sense of community, physical activity levels, and cognitive function.
It is a review of studies about gardening in general; not specifically about Horticultural Therapy. So to present it as evidence of HTs efficacy is misleading at best. Polygnotus (talk) 07:40, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gardening
Talk:Rohit Khare

message: Str6nge:
Musical Artist Str6nges (talk) 07:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

message: "Strange"
Ady:Yunus
Doglan yyly:2007
Doglan yeri:Mary Welayat(Shaher)
Yashayan yeri:Mary Welayat(shaher)
Durmushda:Sambo sporty,design
Gysgaca:"Senem ussat boljakmy onno yoluna dowam et seni gozlerinde bashda kicelderler sonundan gelerler aylanyp shonun ucin hem Ussatlyk Yashda Dal Bashdadyr"...!!! Str6nges (talk) 07:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Str6nge
Talk:Red Bull Technology

message: I would like to add a lot of information to this page as most of its content is about a controversy rather than the company itself. I think it should include more information about what goes on at Red Bull Technology, who works there, and why it was founded. I could use some feed back to see what else should be included.````  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.165.42.195 (talk) 21:21, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Cadena temporal

message: Seeing as Cardena Perpetua does not have its own Wikipedia page, I have added a redirect from Cardena Perpetua --> Cardena Temporal. if cardena perpetua does prove important enough to have its own page then the redirect can be removed. Captain Cookie 20:39, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cardena Perpetua 

message: While the "perpetua" part is technically correct, it misses the point:
The punishment is perpetual, everlasting, neverending. Cf. e.g the phrase "perpetuum mobile" or the etymology of perpetual (http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=perpetual). Continuous, at least in modern standard use is
unlikely to be the meaning implied by "perpetua".
94.220.251.231 (talk) 22:46, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Coffee World

message: This article needs more verifiable sources to substantiate notability. - CobaltBlueTony 18:07, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Afonso I of Kongo

message: I'm not sure if the new image is in fact Afonso I.  Can we get some background.  I'm more inclinded to believe this is King Garcia II since he bears a crown.  The manikongo weren't wearing crowns until Garcia II's reign.  Holla back.Scott Free 18:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Image

message: I've deleted the line concerning Afonso's prior names.  His Kikongo name is not documented before 1545, which is actually after his death, and then as Mozinga Ancuu, which reflects the sixteenth century pronounciation of his name, when the first syllable was "Mu-" which has become shortened in the mid-17th century to a nasal, "N-" which is what there is today.
Afonso took his Christian name undoubtedly upon his baptism in 1491, and given his convictions is likely to have borne it as his primary name throughout the rest of his life, though like the Kongolese who followed him, he surely also retained his Kikongo name.  Beepsie  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.237.238 (talk) 01:28, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prior Names 

message: In describing the miracle, the article says
"The story, first recounted in a letter that was not survived by Afonso himself..."
This implies that the letter died after Afonso, thus he did not "survive" the letter. But letters do not die. I suppose it could also mean that the letter killed Afonso (using the other meaning of "survive") but that is not correct either. 
What is this actually supposed to mean? I cannot access the reference, so before I can fix the sentence to be more readable I will need someone who knows more about Afonso to lend a hand...
Logical options are
1. "The story, first recounted in a now-lost letter by Afonso himself" (if "was" is a typo meant to be "has")
2. "The story, first recounted in a letter written after Afonso's death" (the letter may or may not be lost in this case)
3. "The story, first recounted in a letter which Afonso did not live...past...?"
***The WikiHunter*** (talk) 19:03, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible typo? 

message: There's a paragraph enclosed in quotation marks in Afonso I of Kongo#Rise to power without any attribution or citation. Does anyone here know what it is?  I'm tempted to delete it if no one knows its origin. Justin Kunimune (talk) 16:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for the quote in § Rise to power?
Talk:Syriac Infancy Gospel

message: Why is this categorised as a "lost work"?  texts survive, do they not? Johnbod (talk) 15:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost? 

message: In "Dating and Disbursment" is says_
WAccording to some critical scholarship, its presence in the Qu'ran may be due to the influence the Gospel had amongst the Arabs. It is not known for certain that the Gospel was present in the Hejaz, but it can be seen as likely.[3] However, Islamic Scholars claim that the Gospel was translated into Arabic in the post-Islamic period due the difficulty that 16th century Europeans would have in translating early Arabic's defective script into Latin as well as the extreme rarity of written texts in Pre-Islamic Arabia.[4]W
→ I have trouble understanding the logic of this. "Islamic scholars claim...". Everybody claims that, including Henricus Sike, who first edited the Arabic version. The second part is a non-sequitur. The Gospel (the Syriac one, that is) would have been translated into Arabic in the early Islamic centuries. These people obviously read Arabic in any way. 16th century (why 16th?) Europeans, just as all those who did translations from Spain to Russia do not exhibit such problems. This is a rather absurd assertion which really has no place in an encyclopedia (unless qualified). The extreme rarity of written texts in Pre-Islamic Arabia is also an unwarrented assertion. There is plenty of epigraphic material and as to other texts, lack of evidence, isn't evidence of lack. At any rate, maybe someone can explain what the above section is supposed to say. Thank you.
Simha (talk) 17:58, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dating 

message: The categorisation as "Low importance" seems unhelpful. For certain times and regions, this Gospel had an enormous influence. It is, together with other apokryphal texts, still the source of much of Christmas iconography etc.
Scholars would have different views of this but why would Wikipedia even come up with such an, mostly unapplicable, controversial category?
Simha (talk) 18:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance
Talk:Taiwan/Archive 9

message: I have reviewed this article according to the GA criteria and have quick-failed it at this time. The article has ten "citation needed" tags that all need to be addressed before nominating again. The rest of the article would also benefit from more sourcing as some sections do not have any citations at all. The rest of the article does have a good start on sourcing, is broad in coverage, and has plenty of images. Once you have addressed the sourcing issues and have looked over the rest of the GA criteria, consider renominating the article again. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. Keep up the good work and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 19:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: May I also suggest that you submit this article to peer review before renomination, and try to ask fellow experienced editors to help out. The last peer review was a joke. Good luck! -- Reaper  X 21:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA nomination quick-failed

message: There is a line here that makes it sound like the current administration still insists that it runs mainland China when in fact it is due to the inability to change the constitution. In fact Taiwan's constitution still lists Nanjing as the current capital. This is largely due to the Legislative Yuan's unwillingness to let the constitution be changed.
So is there a way we could rephrase it so it could reflect that the claim is hardwired into the constitution and that its hard to change the constitution right now without causing all sorts of controversy from China and the US.
The problem line is here:
"Although the administration of pro-independence President Chen Shui-bian does not actively claim jurisdiction over all of China, the national boundaries of the ROC have not been redrawn and its outstanding territorial claims from the late 1940s have not been revised.[citation needed] Thus, the claimed area of the ROC continue to include Mainland China, several off-shore islands, Taiwan, Outer Mongolia, northern Myanmar, and Tuva (now Russian territory).
--ShrimpCrackers 02:07, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial line 

message: Why is not "Chinese" written on the "Demonym" row in the country infobox? Of course, the term "Taiwanese" is more used practically, but I think "Chinese" is still remained as the only official (or co-official) demonym of the nation because the official state name is the "Republic of China". ― 韓斌/Yes0song (談笑 筆跡 다지모) 07:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, because the way infobox was coded, it auto links what ever we put there. For example, putting "Taiwanese" will link to the Taiwanese article but putting "Taiwanese and Chinese" will create no link. I tried to add "Chinese" but found it too much trouble to change infobox. --Will74205 21:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demonym 