lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hurricane Barry (1983)

message: Too little information outside of the storm history. While the storm history is nice, it has to have more information that a stub outside of the storm history to remain an article. This storm isn't that notable, and it wasn't a Cape-Verde type hurricane, as inaccurately stated in the intro. Big yes for a merge. Anyone disagree? Hurricanehink 19:51, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, unless the impact section can be expanded.  (BTW I'm responsible for the "Cape Verde-type storm" terminology; it seemed a simple copyedit of the text that was already there.) Jdorje 20:10, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checked NHC. There is some more information in the NHC report, but the storm was so minor that there would be no point. Hurricanehink 20:35, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone still opposed? Hurricanehink 21:42, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not I. Merge it. -- Hurricane Eric archive -- my dropsonde 04:48, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Not bad. Needs a minor copyedit for B-class. --Coredesat 20:35, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: WP:Good article usage is a survey of the language and style of Wikipedia editors in articles being reviewed for Good article nomination.  It will help make the experience of writing Good Articles as non-threatening and satisfying as possible if all the participating editors would take a moment to answer a few questions for us, in this section please.  The survey will end on April 30.
* Would you like any additional feedback on the writing style in this article?
* If you write a lot outside of Wikipedia, what kind of writing do you do?
* Is your writing style influenced by any particular WikiProject or other group on Wikipedia? 
At any point during this review, let us know if we recommend any edits, including markup, punctuation and language, that you feel don't fit with your writing style.  Thanks for your time. - Dan Dank55 (talk)(mistakes) 04:15, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survey 

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#:: 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#:: 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#It is stable.
#:No edit wars etc.: 
#:: 
#It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
#:a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass/Fail: 
#:: </div> There are many issues with the article, and at the current time it does not pass the GA criteria. Thus, I've put the article on-hold for seven days for the improvments to be made. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:47, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review
Talk:Hurricane Doria (1967)

message: Too little effects, too little info outside of the storm history. The intro should not be in a point of view; "One of the most erratic storms ever observed". Anyone disagree for a merge? Hurricanehink 19:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, unless the impact section can be expanded. Jdorje 20:09, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on what is already there, it is unlikely there is much else for an impact section. Hurricanehink 20:15, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, merging now. -- Hurricane Eric archive -- my dropsonde 04:29, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:1934 Central America hurricane

message: Needs more info on the disaster. Jdorje 07:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: This page says that the storm was a Cat3: http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/hurdat/ushurrlist18512007.txt Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 03:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update intensity
Talk:30-degree rule

message: Removed as non-NPOV.
Today this rule is outdated. It's perfectly possible to cut from medium to close without a 30 degree movement. Only with cuts between for example two medium shots of the same subject, is the 30 degree rule a necessity to avoid jump cuts.
I replaced it with the weaselly "Some consider this rule outdated." If anyone want to cite some sources describing it as outdated, it would be great. FreplySpang (talk) 19:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And because the statement is weasel-ly, I'm removing it altogether.  We need a source to claim it is outdated.  SixFourThree (talk) 15:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove
Talk:Spruce Grove

message: what cleanup is required? -19:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alberta which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 00:35, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: There is a section on notable residents of Spruce Grove, but it doesn't note one notable individual who was a resident of Spruce Grove at the time he began to be noticed, even though he moved out later.
It is John Byrne of which I speak. Quadibloc (talk) 19:26, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The John Byrne article does not mention he past residency in Spruce Grove. We'll need a reference from a reliable source to confirm his past residency before adding him to the list, either on his article or on this article when added to the list. Hwy43 (talk) 06:25, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former residents 
Talk:Big Sandy Expedition

message: Who or what is the "bi-speckled newspaperman from Knoxville"?
GreatWhiteNortherner (talk) 11:54, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A belated response. The description refers to Confederate Brig. Gen. Felix Zollicoffer who was a newspaper editor and was quite near-sighted. This article needs some editing, maybe even a few corrections. Donner60 (talk) 07:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  bi-speckled newspaperman 

message: The data in the Casualties and Losses section seem to be reversed.
GreatWhiteNortherner (talk) 11:54, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties and Losses
Talk:Martin Hollis (video game designer)

message: The content of this article was previously copied directly from the Zoonami website. I've cited that as a source (and a couple of others, for the date when he left Rare), reworded much of it and trimmed some of the non-NPOV things. -- 20:02, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/Progress

message: Contact me if you are interested in the spreadsheet that I use to maintain this page. --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 20:06, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

message: I am wandering why these encyclopedias are not being linked in the table. They are: Encarta, Encyclopedia Britannica 2004, Hutchinson, Encyclopedia of Modern Jewish Culture and Weisstein Science Encylopedia. Does this mean these encyclopedia within Wikipedia has no Wikiproject pages? --Siva1979Talk to me 19:24, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the late reply back.  I don't edit nearly as much as I used/would like to.  The above listed projects were direct copies of the index of another encyclopedia which is a violation of copyright.  To remove any risk all the encyclopedias were compiled into a "Hotlist" which still now exists.  The original project pages with the copyrighted lists were deleted.  There was a great deal of work verifying the links in each of the encyclopedias including Encarta, which was about 90% done before it was consolidated into the hotlist.  I kept the projects there for posterity and to boost the number of links removed.  It does not need to be there now.  --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 16:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no link?
Talk:$25 Million Dollar Hoax

message: I have listed the article as a stub because of the short length and as low importance because there is little to distinguish it from other series.--Opark 77 22:05, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment score

message: Why would it be called $25 mil hoax if she had to convince people she'd only won $5 mil? is this a typo? TheHYPO (talk) 18:39, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it was a typo by the person who created this article copy-pasted from somewhere else that was also in error. I fixed it. — WylieCoyote 16:58, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo?
Talk:Covellite

message: :This article was expanded by Jacquelyn for the University of Houston course GEOL 3370 introduction to Mineralogy, Prof. Jonathan Snow, Instructor.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlhurry (talk • contribs) 08:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Crystal structure refinement of covellite HT Evans, JA Konnert - American Mineralogist, 1976 http://www.minsocam.org/ammin/AM61/AM61_996.pdf
* Potter, Robert W.; Evans, Howard T.  "Definitive x-ray powder data for covellite, anilite, djurleite, and chalcocite" 
* Solid State Sciences Volume 9, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 95-99  Synthesis of covellite (CuS) from the elements  Keitaro Tezukaa, William C. Sheetsb, Ryoko Kuriharaa, Yue Jin Shana, Hideo Imotoa, Tobin J. Marksb and Kenneth R. Poeppelmeier
*Covellite formation in low temperature aqueous solutions 
Zeitschrift Mineralium Deposita Heft Volume 7, Number 2 / Juni 1972  180-188 --Stone (talk) 21:45, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The abstract of the reference given states: "never observed before on natural materials" - don't have access to the full article. So it seems supported. However, as Hg was known to be superconducting since 1911 -- it would seem a clarification of exactly what was "never observed before", superconductivity in a solid mineral phase as opposed to liquid mercury? Feel free to edit and correct the article especially if you have access to the source. Vsmith (talk) 17:55, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Hi all, in the first lines it is written that the mineral is "rare", but the next sentence states it is "ubiquitous". I take it is present in small quantities when compared to the bulk but it is actually commonly found?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.132.228.33 (talk) 02:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rare and ubiquitous
Talk:Kristin Linklater

message: Did some wikification. There needs to be a little bit of fact-check, though.  1) Is there a Guthrie Theatre in Stratford, Ontario, or is this the Shakespeare Festival in Stratford where Tyrone Guthrie first began working with the thrust stage he had built at the Guthrie Theater in Minneapolis?  2) There seem to be some websites by and about Ms. Linklater, but I haven't had time to track them down.  Perhaps some enterprising person can do this?  3) I'm lousy at categorization.  Someone want to take this on?  --KJPurscell 20:10, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Her official site suggests that it's the Theater in Minneapolis, but isn't entirely unambiguous so I've removed the location reference. --Whouk (talk) 11:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Category talk:Soap opera actors

message: Category needs to be sorted. I made :Category:Soap opera actors by nationality. --User:Carie
:I've been skittish about creating categories for daytime shows...since an actor can feasibly have starred in five or six soaps, it may be overload on some pages. I did start :Category:Another World actors, though, since it's a finite number of people possible (the show has ended). Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 08:13, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up
Talk:Johnson's criteria

message: I would appreciate if any expert could transform the values for thermal vision, with number of pixels required for DRI. E.g. detection = 2px, recognition = 8px and identifcation = 12px. However there are several pixel counts given on the internet. Therefore I don't want to add it to the article, because I'm not an expert--Optimike (talk) 08:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thermal vision 

message: I'm unable to find an online version of Johnson's 1958 paper.  If you know one, the article would be greatly improved by it's addition. RSaunders 20:27, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johnson's paper online 

message: The link provided for the Harney reference does not go to the paper. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.5.217.3 (talk) 03:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harney reference  

message: I request that the article be renamed "Johnson's criteria", with lowercase "criteria" as per Wikipedia's naming conventions for articles.  --KYN (talk) 11:33, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I verified that it's typically lowercase in books, and moved it.  I agree that the non-possessive form is also about equally common in books; I didn't change that, but wouldn't object.  Dicklyon (talk) 05:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to "Johnson's criteria" (lowercase) 

message: I don't believe, that this is a good example, because even at bright daylight and short distance I sometimes have problems to distinguish for an unknown person, whether it's a man or a woman.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michilans (talk • contribs) 12:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  a woman versus a man 
Talk:Robert Shapiro (lawyer)

message: Article says "Shapiro was born to an Italian family'
Sure about that?
tharsaile (talk) 00:19, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian Family? 

message: There is another Robert Shapiro, who is professor ermitus at NYU. He is involved with chemistry and exobiology. I wont write the article, because I have no idea about the style rules and because I am a poor writer, but would appriciate, if someone would do. Here are two links to start with: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/bios/shapiro.html http://chemistry.fas.nyu.edu/object/robertshapiro.html
:I'd suggest at least creating a user account here and then writing something in your user area to start. Someone can proof-read and copyedit from there if you want. From the links you provided, I'm not even sure he's noteworthy enough - but I'm not an expert on such questions. --wknight94 20:55, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If he had an article, you could put a proper italicized "see also" link at the top. It's not customary to put a reference at the bottom of a bio page referring to someone who doesn't have an article - therefore, I'm going to revert the latest edit for now. If an article is created, feel free to put a notice up at the top. —Wknight94 (talk) 00:07, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I created the article, and then the notice. --Christofurio 20:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A disambiguation page may be in order; there are a number of links within Wikipedia to this page, expecting that the former Warner Brothers bigwig/artichoke Robert Shapiro is covered. Abb3w 13:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Robert Shapiros
Talk:Submerged (2005 film)

message: The body is almost totally the same text as used on the IMDb "full summary". DiverScout (talk) 21:21, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 

message: As noted by the editor above over a year ago, it was a copy and paste found on multiple websites.  Millahnna (talk) 20:10, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed plot for copyvio
Talk:Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media

message: My name is Tom Scheinfeldt.  I am the assistant director of the Center for History and New Media.  CHNM has copyright to the material previously posted in the article in question and is happy to have it reproduced there.  I have posted a revised and expanded version of this text at Center for History and New Media/Temp
:I have moved this text to the article page. It is released under the GFDL by the copyright holder. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 20:20, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Including material directly from CHNM is okay, given that copyright issues are worked out.  However, much of the text here sounded a bit more like a sales pitch, and not in compliance with WP:NPOV.  This happens when one writes about oneself, their organization, employer, etc.  I've listened to Dan Cohen on the radio, so with what I now know about the center, I have started to copyedit the article, format the article, etc., to help bring the article into compliance with Wikipedia policies.  Another Wikipedia policy yet to be addressed properly is citing sources.  There is a specific way to format references, and this still needs to be done.  I can come back later and work on it. -Aude (talk | contribs) 20:28, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of all the (very interesting) projects listed in the article, which ones are most signficant and notable?  why?  While there are many interesting projects from the CHNM, I think it would be better not to list everything and maybe discuss some of the most key projects in some more depth.  I'd immediately think of the September 11 Digital Archive, which appeals to the broader public, as does the Hurricane Digital Memory Bank.  I also think of the digital preservation (this article needs work too) research and work at the CHNM. -Aude (talk | contribs) 20:39, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: I changed the name of the CHNM for Roy Rosenzweig CHNM, as it's named from April 15 2011. --Historiaabierta (talk) 14:08, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The article's subject doesn't seem to be notable by itself and could easily be merged. FallingGravity 03:28, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[History News Network]] 

message: Hi everyone,
I checked the references inserted after  template and I consider the issues has been addressed adequately, so I remove it. However I would like to be sure if  is agree due he was who added it and he is still active in the project. If anyone is not agree, you feel free to add it again and please, indicate me where you consider necessary additional references. I am interested in translate to Spanish but first I would like to solve it.
Regards, Ivanhercaz (Talk) 04:44, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:   Done! Thank you very much for your answer. Ivanhercaz (Talk) 16:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third-party warning
Talk:Crimean Tatars in Romania

message: : In the 1930s, the Fascist Iron Guard terrorised the Tatars and Turks, and 37,000 Tatars left the region for Turkey in the late 1930s. In 1938, 22,141 Tatars remained in Dobruja.
do you have any source for this? Anonimu 20:38, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Christmas controversies/Archive 2

message: * The phenomenon of the "secularization of Christmas" may be too vague to describe beyond individual perceptions of propriety. It will be easier to discuss the more specific "War on Christmas" in an encyclopedic manner as it is framed by verifiable sources. The problem we're having with everyone's little anecdotal contributions to War on Christmas isn't that they're off-topic, but that to put them there without attributing their significance constitutes original research. Making a separate article of the larger topic invites original research and ultimately constitutes an unsupportable POV. Without verifiable sources, this is nothing more than a dictionary definition with a POV attached. --Dystopos 20:41, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about merging it with the Happy Holidays article (stub)? That term seems to be a common thread. keith 21:15, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Happy Holidays seems like a perfectly comprehensive little article and it would be a shame to pollute it with this op-ed. --Dystopos 17:23, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for this article

message: The POV question centers around whether there is anything verifiable to say about this, beyond defining the idea, that isn't already covered by War on Christmas. If there is anything, then it would have to be sourced, and not original research. You can't just have two articles referring to each other without anything to say. Is there, in fact, a secularization of Christmas? Who's doing it? Who says so?  --Dystopos 19:30, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Virginia, Minnesota

message: I removed the zero-content link to Paul Metsa.  If you can find a better link than to a blank wiki page, feel free to re-add it.
Re-removed empty link to Paul Metsa.  If an editor feels this empty link is important, they can discuss here. --EpochFail (talk) 21:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Paul Metsa

message: I am removing the Crime section due to lack of reliable sources for the statements about the city rank given in Wikipedia's voice. The first reference is the FBI site that provides the crime data. The FBI site not only does not do rankings (see the Minnesota page) but says not to use the data for rankings. The FBI site for 2019 prominently links to the FBI's two page "Caution Against Ranking" document explaining why the their Uniform Crime Reporting data is not appropriate for comparisons. To quote the FBI document: "Data users should not rank locales because there are many factors that cause the nature and type of crime to vary from place to place. UCR statistics include only jurisdictional population figures along with reported crime, clearance, or arrest data. Rankings ignore the uniqueness of each locale." A bulleted list of 13 reasons follows. 
The other two references are from two websites of dubious reliability, RoadSnacks and www.neighborhoodscout.com, which used the data to create rankings anyway. They assume that every victim of a reported crime is a permanent resident of the cities where the crimes are reported and divide the number of crimes by the population of the city. The second reference, RoadSnacks, ranks Bemidji, a Minnesota tourist area and regional commercial center of an area with thousands of summer residents as the worst place in Minnesota using this assumption, saying "Folks in Bemidji had a 1 in 13 chance of being the victim of a property crime over 2019." It treats Virginia in the same way. Virginia is the commercial and entertainment hub of an industrialized mining area encompassing a string of smaller mining towns and a lake area with many summer residents and tourists. Crimes are reported by both residents and visitors. The third source, www.neighborhoodscout.com, calculates the crime rate per 1000 residents, then says misleadingly "One's chance of becoming a victim of either violent or property crime here is one in 24." StarryGrandma (talk) 18:17, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the Crime section 

message: If Virginia is a suburb of Duluth then Rochester, Eau Claire, St Cloud, Mankato, and La Crosse are suburbs of the Twin Cities. It makes more sense, after all the Twin Cities are much bigger and there's much more in between them and those places. 75.27.37.89 (talk) 11:28, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suburb of Duluth
Talk:Hip (disambiguation)

message: Given that Hip (anatomy) is most common usage, and that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia (it would be expected that the body part be an article) I propose that Hip redirects to Hip (anatomy) and that this disambiguation page gets moved to Hip (disambiguation).
*Propose and Support--Commander Keane 20:45, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I've done the move and redirect. I don't know anything about HIP though.--Commander Keane 12:39, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move and redirect proposal
Talk:Crowthorne

message: --Rustikal (talk) 21:57, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Add if you think needed, with reference. Bmcln1 (talk) 22:28, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there no link and short description of the [[Transport Research Laboratory]], TRL?