Talk:TrackIR

message: Links to alternative solutions have been repeatedly removed.  
 
This is clearly against Wikipedia  policy; pages should not be deliberately censored to create a bias in the interests of commercial promotion.  There are many other pages that have links to alternative solutions, notably the Microsoft Windows page has  a section on free open source alternatives, Microsoft Office links to the free Open Office and AutoCAD links to numerous  competitors, just to mention a few.
Kestrel7e7 (talk) 16:23, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: FreeTrack controversy

message: These external images were placed on the page. Maybe someone can upload it to WP.
This one was at the top:
Image:http://www.naturalpoint.com/trackir/02-products/0-resources-products/TRACKIR4-photo.jpg
This one was under the History section:
(TrackIR 1, 2, and 3) http://www.naturalpoint.com/trackir/02-products/0-resources-products/trackir-3pro-front-whiteBG.jpg
Leedeth 06:43, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Can anyone explain this part's second paragraph (as of ), and maybe clarify it? It seems to say that OptiTrack will do 6DOF for all NaturalPoint cameras, then contradicts itself by saying that it won't do 6DOF at all and won't work with some NatualPoint cameras (TIR 3+). 24.76.178.14 (talk) 21:22, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Supporting TrackIR" 

message: A category should be made and the list should be eliminated. Cky2250 (talk) 17:25, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supported games 

message: As a forker and committer of ftnoir, I request that you add information that we support *all* games that TIR5 supports.
Also, could you add opentrack, the fork? Got COI here. 2001:470:600D:DEAD:BEAE:C5FF:FEE1:4407 (talk) 11:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No action needed. This is unrelated to this article.Cky2250 (talk) 13:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  opentrack/facetracknoir 

message: This article is NOT updated.
I tried to update it but a user systematically delete my comments !!!
Comments refer to a review published in 2008 and do not list improvements done in 2013 and 2014 !!
Why to mention a criticism in the article ? It is not its place.
Personally I use the ClipPro in Falcon 4 BMS 4.32 update 7 and its work perfectly, even for X, Y and Z axis.
I recommend it and many users of the Benmchmarksims.org forum do as well in 2014.
I updated the article with an updated link. Hope the comment will remain.
Last check :
The user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Solarra delete my comments. Bravo !!:-(
Solarra is not an objective user, it is realy a pity, all the more she claim that her info is relevant.
She only forget it is obsolete and has not been updated !
She does not merit to be a so called moderator for wikipedia. She is rather a censor !!
In these conditions, I do no more cooperate anymore on this page if her opinion prevails on objectivity.
I think that your attitude will be bring to the attention of Natural Point sale team and of Benchmark sims forum.
Solarra, you should read again the quality objectives defined by Wikipedia....
I just had a contact with Natural Point. The responsible of the sale team confirmed that a few people from wikipedia are "controlling" this article, and that it is impossible to any external writer to add any objective comment related to TrackIR products.
When a senior moderator from Wikipedia will correct this problem ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.99.17.170 (talk) 19:22, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  TrackIR ClipPro 

message: I chopped large portions of this article, as well as statements without sources and items tagged CN. In one case the CN tag was for 2009! I removed about five or six sources that were non-RS, as they were user forums. It still sounds like an advertisement, but it is improved. Head tags updated. I think what this article really needs is to be nominated for deletion.104.163.150.250 (talk) 01:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Article trim and cleanup