lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Telephony Application Programming Interface

message: It talks in this section how TAPI 3.x is COM based with the intention of making it accessible in managed code envionments. However this isn't true - COM has nothing to do with managed code. Further to that TAPI 3 cannot be used in managed code and have any guarantees about it's execution. There's an MS knowledge base article on it somewhere.
I'd rather an expert on TAPI rewrote the section if someone is watching, otherwise I'll do it myself at some point.--Notorious Biggles 21:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note to all: this work has been completed--Socnet (talk) 09:37, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  TAPI 2 vs TAPI 3 section is misleading 

message: IMHO, removing the column was a bad idea. Now it looks like there's a bug of PBXs that don't support TAPI, and that's pejorative. The PBXs do have perfectly good TAPI drivers, but just not from the manufacturer. That's not always a bad thing. 
By way of example only, the Allworx TAPI driver is "first party only" which is quite restricting, but there are "third party TAPI drivers" also available.  (That's "third party" in the TAPI sense, as well as meaning make by someone else).
This information is sadly lost. I for one used it for reference. There's nowhere else on the internet with this information. 
The "suppliers" of such tech may not have been "notable" in some senses of the work, but in TAPI circles, Mondago and Estos are the powerhouses keeping the technology alive.Socnet (talk) 06:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate Suppliers Column 

message: Thank you for tidying up the page, but I have to wonder why you described TAPI in such historic terms. It is true that it is an interface for "PBXs" rather than, say, hosted, multi-tenant telephony, but the article already says that. And TAPI remains the current and only method of integrating CTI to many of these PBXs. 
SIP and the older H323 protocols are good, but they are not an equivalent, not even on hosted PBXs. They are primarily used to carry voice, whereas TAPI provides full call control. 
You also left in several hosted PBXs in the list, and some PBXs that don't even support TAPI. I've removed these and left the list of PBXs current.
Finally, there is undoubtedly a shift towards hosted telephony, but PBX systems still outsell hosted telephony in all major countries.
(talk) 22:36, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading entry by DmitryKo
Talk:Shambhala Publications

message: It's hard to get information on significant publishers once they become imprints of larger publishers, and harder still when they are not a web presence like so many modern businesses; for anyone not familiar with this publisher, rest assured, they have a permanent place in the pantheon of religious/spiritual book publishers. if Pokemon can have 8,000 articles devoted to each whisker on each creature, then this publisher must stay. I WILL try to flesh it out some more: (note that I am not the creator of this article) I really hope we can move towards acknowledging the role of publishers like this. if you do a search for shambhala publications, or shambhala, youll probably find, i would guess, at least a few hundred links to REFERENCES in WP (hey, I nailed it: I just did the search and 419 incidents found!). I think every publisher whose books are used significantly as reference material on WP should have at least a stub. I know the books themselves are the most critical to have articles on, but publishers like this are not just businesses, but collectors of knowledge. so please, please please dont delete this. I already had a stub article on sierra club books deleted (merged), which I will try to recreate when I have more refs: without these publishers, wikipedia would absolutely not exist!Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article needs keeping in if posible.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 23:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please don't delete this article
Talk:Livery of seisin

message: I've merged the text from T&T to here (bottom half of article).  I'll put the merge notice on the T&T page, but it seems so obvious that these two articles are about the same thing that I'll put the redirect from there to here rather soon, unless anybody objects.  Smallbones (talk) 02:03, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged text from [[Turf and twig]]
Talk:SGIO (Western Australia)

message: """This was shown in its company magazine Insurance Lines, which was established in 1917, where the pages began to be dominated by information regarding life insurance instead of its previous main focus which was worker's compensation insurance. By the 1970s life insurance began to be SGIO's main achievement and focal point. Because of this expansion into different areas of insurance, SGIO became a main competitor in all areas of insurance. In the 1970s the Queensland office formed the SGIO Building Society, after a series of other Queensland building societies were united together, and with this, they began to incorporate a strategy that would help begin their privatisation. This strategy included acquiring the Permanent Finance Corporation and becoming a major shareholder in the Bank of Queensland""" this is relivant to suncorp (formerly SGIO-QUEENSLAND)
Pga1965 (talk) 11:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  INCORRECT PAGE FOR INFORMATION
Talk:Seven sisters (studios)

message: I've been following the entertainment industry for over a decade and I've never heard of this term. There are only a handful of obscure references online and on Google Books.  It looks like a few people were trying to use the term in the 1990s but it never really took off and was not universally adopted in the industry. --Coolcaesar (talk) 06:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think this article needs to be deleted as non-notable 

message: This topic should be mentioned within the history of major film studios. It does not appear relevant as its own article, as it only makes sense within that historical context. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 00:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Major film studio]]
Talk:Esko Laine

message: This article incorporate material of  and , that by means of autorización  allowed  used the content and to publicized under permissionGFDL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cada2 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I have removed the notability tag. While this article needs a lot of work, the subject is notable, and the article asserts that notability. He has won multiple awards, including the ARD International Music Competition. A quick Google search indicates that he is a very prominent double-bass player. Areas of improvement for this article still include references and some input by an expert on the subject. —BradV 22:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a plan. I had left the tag because I thought he seemed notable but I didn't find *any* English language sources to flesh it out. It's in better shape then it was. TRAVELLINGCARIMy storyTell me yours 00:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Sequah Medicine Company

message: An advertisement was placed in The Independent newspaper (Hawaii) on June 15th., 1895 on the newspaper's last print before merging with another newspaper. Another interesting link that will be of note to the medically curious is at PubMed Central where the intriguing story extends to many pages. Happy reading!..MZionC (talk) 21:18, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequah Speaks 

message: Article fails to note that this company started by him, and grew into a company later.
http://thequackdoctor.com/index.php/sequah-a-victorian-celebrity-quack/CrocodilesAreForWimps (talk) 15:57, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I had the same thought. But based on the current references on the article I was able to confirm that Hartley founded the company and edited it to clarify that fact. DatraxMada (talk) 07:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Henry Hartley
Talk:Sepura

message: This article looks like it was written entirely by Sepura PR. Treat with caution.
I used to work for Sepura and some of the content is very inaccurate. The STP8000 was designed for the specific needs of the German police, it had nothing to do with climate change! And the better water proofing was a simple result of many SRP and SRH radios failing in the field due to being full of water when it was raining. Connector Protector does guard against salt water conditions it is true, but the requirement for it had absolutely nothing to do with the London Olympics. Devon and Cornwall Police were significant drivers of that requirement amongst other uses, but the Olympics were never mentioned. The article also misses out the SRG2000, SRG3500 and a number of other products.
----
Sepura made dummy radios for TV producers by simply gluing some spare plastic bodies and displays together. These cost next to nothing, and had no working electronics at all. SpareHeadOne 20:58, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sephadex

message: The material on this page has been copied directly from  page. A more personal review of the article by an expert may improve its explanatory quality. Although the page I mentioned uses the word "gelfiltration," I think term should be modified to the less daedal "gel filtration" for laymen. 
Thanks all.
Elsweyn (talk) 05:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Seoul Semiconductor

message: See the Google profile for the correct name. I will move the article (again) and place redirects. Lester 03:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name is Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd 

message: What is DOE? - Dominant Over Everyone or John Doe - is it a country? What is COB - corn on the cob? The article appears to be just a gross cut & paste from here: 
http://www.acriche.com/en/product/prd/acrich2.asp
and here
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/10/prweb8884852.htm
"Previously using LED light sources has required the help of various converters" - and so why are these LEDs different - what's changed? This phrase "lighting manufactures [sic] can be directly pluged [sic] into the wall without considering any electrical conditions." Does that mean it doesn't need wires?
This phrase "allowing manufacturers to bypass the chip connection process before use" - what does it mean?
Sorry for being so critical - the article sounds like an advertisement - a lot has been lost in the translation from Korean to English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.191.112.66 (talk) 23:21, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs work
Talk:The Best of Leonard Cohen

message: I don’t think it makes sense to consider the 1975 and 2009 compilations the same: The titles are different, and, as per the article, 14 tracks are different between them.Ulmanor (talk) 02:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split page request 

message: On the back of the cd there is an image of a prostrate man and an upright woman with some cuneiform or hieroglyphs - anybody come across any research explaining what they mean ? — ⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht Talk/Stalk 18:02, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  hieroglyphs/cuneiform/ feminine divine image
Talk:Senator Lines

message: According to this article, Hanjin Shipping acquired full control of Senator in 1997 and Senator was renamed "Senator Lines" in 2000. But, then the article jumps to "By combining its container fleet with Hanjin, the newly created Hanjin-Senator..." When did that happen? How was Hanjin-Senator structured and what was its relationship with Senator, Hanjin Shipping, and Hanjin?
According to Hanjin-Senator (which also doesn't give a founded date), the parents of Hanjin-Senator were Hanjin Shipping and Senator Lines. This makes it sound like Hanjin-Senator was almost a joint venture of the two with both being direct subsidiaries of Hanjin? But, in this article, it was Hanjin Shipping (subsidiary of Hanjin) that acquired Senator. So, was Hanjin-Senator a joint venture between Senator Lines and its parent Hanjin Shipping?
Also, oddly, this article says Hanjin-Senator ceased operations in 2009 but Hanjin-Senator says Senator Lines ceased operations in 2009. Seems like those statements should be clarified on both: "Senator Lines ceased operations in 2009 causing Hanjin Shipping to shut down Hanjin-Senator as well. Hanjin Shipping continued operations until 2017." Or whatever the reality is. That's my understanding from this article, Hanjin-Senator, and Hanjin Shipping (which unhelpfully has no mention of Senator Lines or Hanjin-Senator) but I haven't yet been able to find a reliable source that lays this out clearly.
Any help clarifying would be appreciated. DatraxMada (talk) 07:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was the specific relationship with Hanjin-Senator?
Talk:Parenchyma

message: I would like to point out that when talking about tissues in an animal's body, it is correct to point to parenchyme rather than parenchyma. (Brusca, R. C., Brusca, G. J. 2003. Invertebrates.) Also, the given textbook including some older ones from Oxford univ. press do not use the term parenchyme in such context as in the article (regarding zoology). Rather, parenchyme is used as a specific sub-unit of mesenchyme. I would suggest being critical towards the context of the term "parenchyma" used in this article and if possible, expert verification would be highly appreciated..--Osmoregulator (talk) 22:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: There is a section on the page ground tissue called 'parenchyma' which contains more information than the one here. Is there some way of reconciling these two? For now I will add the text from the ground tissue page to this page, but leave the current text intact.Famedog (talk) 13:12, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made some changes, which you might like to have a look at, concerning in particular the question of regarding epidermis as parenchyma. I suggest that that idea is obsolete at best, mistaken in its day, and does WP no credit. I included refs. Reactions, anyone? JonRichfield (talk) 16:31, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plant parenchyma and the 'ground tissue' page 

message: I see absolutely no point in simply repeating the bulk of what is at the more appropriate article for plant parenchyma, namely Ground tissue#Parenchyma, which is what this article previously did. I have added there the only two points previously made here which were not there, and reduced the section here to a very brief statement and a "main" link.
The zoological material needs to be re-written to explain that this is a historical term, not used today in relation to animals. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Has parenchyma in relation to animals really become "a historical term, not used today"? For example, the use of the term in connection with fish over the last 10 years seems quite extensive in Google scholar. --Epipelagic (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future of the article 
Talk:Slavery at common law

message: Joseph Knight's case happened under the Scottish legal system, which is generally civil law rather than common law. LukeSurl t c 09:43, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joseph Knight's case 

message: I have reverted the deletion of the comment about Cartwright's slave possibly being African.  I think it is generally acknowledged that we don't now know with any certain what ethnicity the slave had.  However, given that many of the common law cases later focussed upon the "infidel" rationale on the basis that slaves were black, I don't think it is inapt to comment on the possibility that Cartwright's slave may also have been black.  Conversely, I can't see any reason for commenting on the possibility (whilst acknowledging that it is certainly not a probability - the first serious wave of African slaves did not arrive until the 1700s). --Legis (talk - contribs) 17:17, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not really Wikipedia's place to comment on that possibility, unless other sources have already commented on that possibility. I'm not ruling out the Cartwright's slave might have been black (I was aware of Pushkin's ancestor previously), but it does seem a bit WP:SYNTHESIS-y to introduce that with a source. The preceding sentence isn't really sourced either, maybe we just shouldn't say anything about the slave's ethnicity? 106.69.250.123 (talk) 04:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, that is fair enough. Sorry, I had thought you had simply deleted without thinking. --Legis (talk - contribs) 14:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Cartwright's case - ethnicity of slave

message: The "African slave trade and the common law" section is not quite a verbatim copy-paste from John Baker's book, but is very close to it - for example:
I've added the appropriate template to the article. Tevildo (talk) 23:56, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the meaning of "lie" in the first sentence of both versions? I'd also like to know what those sentences mean. 2602:306:BC65:53A9:34D1:2453:D594:6131 (talk) 13:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borderline [[WP:COPYVIO]]
Talk:SEMATECH

message: SEMATECH seems to in Albany, NY. 
Why is there Austin and Texas here?  --Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.141.27.167 (talk) 14:12, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Because we list the location of the organization's headquarters and not branch offices.  Austin was selected for SEMATECH's location when the consortium was founded, and is still listed as by SEMATECH as being their official headquarters.  Albany is only the location of SEMATECH-North. --Allen3 talk 14:42, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Texas or Austin 

message: It seems a little odd that Austin is only mentioned once briefly in the article, since Sematech played a fairly pivotal role in catalyzing Austin's rise as a center of high-tech stuff... AnonMoos (talk) 16:13, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 2021
Talk:Selsun Blue

message: Pricing of consumer products varies to such an extent that it is inappropriate to discuss price comparisons in an encyclopedia article.  
83.78.55.252 (talk) 05:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree. Prices vary from store to store. The price data in this article is clearly original research -- i.e. someone comparing prices in their personal drug store and figuring out the "per ounce" cost themselves. This wasn't some consumer group's research. I'll delete it. ask123 (talk) 19:54, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Price Comparison 

message: The selenium type is a treatment for an active fungal infection
Zinc is a treatment for overgrowth or buildup of skin= pure dandruff,
and preventative of fungal infection
zinc would be best for  treatment of itches , so that the patient does not scratch , which prevents further insults.
122.111.25.65 (talk) 22:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  selenium vs zinc 

message: How many people have large mood swings due to skin contact with selsun's selenium product  ?
Is there a connection between improper handling of lead (eg washing hands with leaded petrol, or use of lead solder in jewelry, for example), and   selsun blue (with selenium)?
Did exposure to lead have to occur before sensitivity to selenium occurs  ?
I suggest using the zinc anti-dandruff unless an actual fungal infecton is detected or most likely .
122.111.25.65 (talk) 22:36, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  selenium sensitivity 

message: Product description
 
on Chattem's official site
seems to be no longer valid  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.247.131.12 (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken link 

message: I find this shampoo extremely effective in treating dandruff and other scalp conditions
I'm getting mines cheap at http://www.selsunshampoo.com
What's your experience guys?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.69.247.77 (talk) 22:45, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selsun Shampoo 

message: If the active ingredient changes, the product may carry the same brand and name but it is a different product. Both should have an entry and make very clear which one is the historical formulation and which one is the present commercial brand formulation. Each seems to be effective treatment for its own set of conditions, not both for the same set of conditions (types of dandruff, skin fungus). The therapeutic relation of each should be clarified.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.30.56.204 (talk) 03:14, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should distinguish between historical formula and current presentation
Talk:Fritz Schäffer

message: Says who? It isn't mentioned elsewhere in the article and I've never heard about it before, nor does Schäffer seem to have been attacked by the later GDR for anti-Semitism (and they would have if they could have). --131.159.76.228 (talk) 18:16, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction, it is mentioned, though in the context it would be interesting to know precisely how anti-Semitic these speeches were, and where the source for that is. (German sources by the way usually only mention a less than eager attitude towards denazification, which in itself could well have been enough for Eisenhower. And, again, even the GDR does not seem to have thundered against Schäffer for anti-Semitism.)--131.159.76.228 (talk) 18:20, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: when his anti-Semitic past became known?
Talk:Select Medical

message: Why isn't there any information regarding activities other than basic promo-material?  For example, the many different historical and local-community issues surrounding the buy-renovate-at-will demands made by SEM to city governments.  Case-in-point, the historic St. Joseph Hospital of Mount Clemens, MI.  The building is operated as Select Specialty Hospital.  SEM demolished the historic, block-long, pillared porch in August 2010, and has fought every attempt by the local historic commission at listing the building under a historic provision.  When the City Commission was considering labeling the building as a historic district, representatives from Select Specialty Hospital opposed the action and 'reminded' the commissioners that SEM pays $150,000 in taxes.  The City Commission, in part for fear that SEM might close up shop if any attempts were made to protect local concerns over SEM agenda.
The situation that continues to play out in Mount Clemens is not an isolated case regarding local insterests in properties purchased by SEM.  
My understanding is that this type of information - the actions made by the corporation regarding local issues - must be included in the article to keep it POV (otherwise, the whole page might have to be removed). Tesseract501 (talk) 21:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The page seems to be company promotion

message: I removed the tag stating the page relied too much on primary sources after replacing almost all of the primary sources with third party sources. GroundFloor (talk) 14:17, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary Source Tag