lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kingdom of Lithuania (1918)

message: Despite the fact that it is not a strict requirement (see WP:FNNR), I'd suggest we follow the following convention: "Notes" for the explanatory material and "Citations" for the citations. A good practice in Wikipedia is that sections should not bear confusingly similar titles: my rationale is that 'footnotes' and 'notes' are confusingly similar to each other. I would like to stress that my proposal is not about exercising any kind of misplaced consistency. It's a proposal towards less confusing conventions in a specific series of articles. --Omnipaedista (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Appendix titles

message: Pinging all involved users: User:Sabbatino, User:Лобачев Владимир, User:Samhanin. The flag that Samhanin adds is perfectly justified - in the article, there is the photo of the Vilnius Conference in 1917, where the flag is used. The Wiki article also has the same photo but larger that also includes the flag, which Samhanin made into a rather good-looking SVG file. As for the colours, they are the ones that have always been used. I suggest we keep the flag.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 14:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the flag
Talk:List of The Howard Stern Show staff

message: In studio personnel ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:87F0:1CC0:3D30:521E:4600:BC60 (talk) 06:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

message: The claim that Sal Governale worked in a boiler room operation is not sourced and is potentially libelous.  This description of his securities career should be removed unless there are credible sources to back it up. 2601:2C6:4300:6090:9DD5:90D6:D97:44B0 (talk) 20:58, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sal entry
Talk:Arbor Mist

message: this stuff is great! Spic98 17:55, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Random comments
Talk:My Own Worst Enemy (song)

message: I'm fairly sure it's a breach of copyright rules to have the lyrics to this song on the page. As such I've deleted them, but feel free to put them back. Matt.smart 20:27, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  lyrics 

message: In March 2023, Lit released a mashup of "My Own Worst Enemy" and "Anti-Hero" by Taylor Swift. It's officially under the band's name on streaming services, including Spotify and Apple Music. Should there be a section for this version of the song on the main page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.195.27.161 (talk) 23:51, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, it probably should be discussed with some brevity at the very least. I'll get around to it eventually. dannymusiceditor  oops  01:36, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "My Own Worst Anti-Hero"
Talk:VoteToImpeach

message: Could someone please explain how this organisation is affiliated with the WWP? The source provided only presents a disparaging text about that party and calls VoteToImpeach a front without presenting any evidence of that. Eggandbacon 17:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

message: This page is currently under attack, having been nominated for deletion.  I suggest that those who see this 6 year old Wikipedia article as a part of real history should add additional solid references and details to it to fend off the attempt by an avowed conservative to censor it permanently. See the notification at the top of the main article for futher details.  Jusdafax (talk) 19:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Under Attack, Proposed for Deletion

message: Thanks to User:TomCat4680 for adding this article to your project. Jusdafax (talk) 07:39, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome [[Wikipedia: Article Rescue Squadron]]
Talk:Nunhead Cemetery

message: In the gallery I have placed two pictures of the base of the Scottish Martyrs Monument. I presume the request is for the obelisk above it. My personal view is that the base is much more interesting. Next time I visit (this will be in 2011) I will take a photograph (if neccessary of course). JHvW (talk) 17:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Obelisk

message: Article currently states that he is buried here. Seems highly unlikely as he died as an outlawed exile in France (see Thomas Muir article, which doesn't currently state where he was buried). Yes, there's a monument to the Scottish Political Martyrs in this cemetery and yes, it has Muir's name on it - could it be that the original wiki editor mistook it for a gravestone? 81.151.230.24 (talk) 18:15, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agreed, and removed it. – Fayenatic London 12:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas Muir 

message: There's a new press story on the Leysdown Tragedy - worth a Wikipedia article in its own right? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:01, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leysdown Tragedy 

message: I'm removing this source as it doesn't support the cited point, and as a personal blog is not WP:RS. Nevertheless the links at the end might be worth looking up: http://www.worldofbadger.co.uk/2008/05/14/i-see-dead-people-a-visit-to-nunhead-cemetery/ – Fayenatic London 12:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blogs
Talk:List of Judge John Deed episodes

message: Looks very impressive, (I assume) WindsorFan. Much neater and better laid out than the old summaries.82.3.78.201 02:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it's now just a matter of people tweaking the summaries. I'll get around to making the ratings references inline citations at some point. WindsorFan 08:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice work! 

message: Please add some clue about the meaning of the Series 5, Episode 1 title "Hard-Gating". Does this make more sense to British viewers? Is it a play on InvestiGating?-71.174.185.30 (talk) 02:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hard-Gating 

message: After a single initial broadcast, the last two episodes of Series 5 (505 and 506) were officially withdrawn by BBC from ever being available by broadcast or DVD etc.
( www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/54268/judge-john-deed-season-5/ )
This is problematic both with regards to the primary content of those episodes, and confusing viewers who want to understand the longer story arcs of the personal relationships of the characters.
The official BBC episode list does still in 2017 acknowledge the withdrawn episodes, and summarize them (but does not mention in any way the controversy etc about the episodes).
( www.bbc.co.uk/drama/judge/episodes/judge_episodes_2006_feature.shtml )
* gfnewman.com/video/
: THE BANNED EPISODES
: "The following are links to two episodes of Judge John Deed, which were banned by the BBC for their content. We have received many requests from fans wanting to know how to view these missing episodes, so here they are."
The series writer G.F. Newman is adamant about continuing to provide access to the missing episodes, and links to online copies on his website.-71.174.175.199 (talk) 02:32, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  MMR vaccine controversy
Talk:While She Was Out

message: Since not all of the reviews for this film reached the same conclusion (positive or negative), i believe the article should include represenative examples of reviews that praise it, and some that criticize it.  For objectivity, independent review summaries with a numerical score--such as rotten tomatoes and imdb--should be included. Naturallyblind (talk) 17:04, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Allknowing, it is customary for Wikipedia articles to quote short excerpts from published reviews, and to include citations to them, as an indication of how the film was received and for the sake of verifiability.  Selecting only the comments that agree with your POV is not acceptable.  If you find specific "attacks" (on the movie, the actors, the director, yourself, whatever) in the article, by all means delete them, but please explain the problem with them here, so they can be discussed. Naturallyblind (talk) 01:43, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews
Talk:National Archives of Scotland

message: * http://www.publictechnology.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=21448&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0
* "The Scottish Government and the National Archives of Scotland (NAS) are releasing the documents early as part of International Right to Know Day.", STV
* Secret government files to be opened to public, The Scotsman
* Archives reveal ‘difficulties’ of oil-rich Scotland, The Times
* North Sea oil gave Scotland 'massive' budget surplus, say Government records, The Telegraph
* Documents reveal what oil could have meant to an independent Scotland, STV
* Files reveal RBS takeover fears, BBC News online
* Files reveal tension over Pope’s visit, The Herald
* Sectarianism, sword and security – the truth behind Pope's visit, The Scotsman
--Mais oui! (talk) 07:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scottish Government unlocks files closed to public for 30 years 

message: '...Scotland ... her role...'? Would 'the Fatherland' be 'his role'? 80.254.147.68 (talk) 16:02, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Gender roles

message: As the body changed its name, should the intro not be in the present tense? Jackiespeel (talk) 16:13, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Present tense
Talk:The Tiger in the Smoke

message: Characters: Jack Havoc
The British Army unit in which Jack Havoc served with other characters is not named. Though they were used for a commando-type raid on German-occupied France in early 1944, it is not accurate to call him a Commando. Maybe "Special Forces member" would be better?
The Lawless One (talk) 14:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Valkyries

message: Paulo Coelho novels aren't notable? Nateji77 (talk) 08:09, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: This article has just said that the novel is about exorcism of one's personal demons, but, having just finished the novel myself today (22 November 2009), I would have thought it is more  to with one's angels. One thing I did wonder - this is hinted at in the book - was whether Paulo Coelho's marriage was going through a pretty troubled time when he wrote this book. I do not have any reliable sources,but that does seem to be implied by the book. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 22:44, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Angels
Talk:Magnetic Hill (disambiguation)

message: I've redirected this page to gravity hill because this page lists articles about gravity hills-- which is the exact scope of the gravity hill article. The one exception being the song by the Candadian rock band. In cases like these, a disambiguation link is more appropriate than an entire disambig page. The  template was created for purposes exactly like these. Please read WP:D#Disambiguation links for further information. 高 04:50, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig page not needed

message: Migrated and cropped from irrelevancy
I was assuming you thought the disambiguation page was a list of gravity/magnetic hills, instead of a list of articles called Magnetic Hill, but your recent creation of List of magnetic hills does appear somewhat pointy, given that the article's called Gravity hill and the category's called Category:Gravity hills, so the list should be called List of gravity hills.
Regarding your constant revertions to Magnetic Hill (disambiguation), why would someone searching for Magnetic Hill (Canada) find it helpful to be directed to a page listing hundreds of gravity hills? Disambiguation pages help readers find the article they are looking for, just because the disambiguation page contains articles that also happen to be gravity hills doesn't mean it should be redirected to the article about gravity hills. It would show some good faith on your part if you moved the list of magnetic hills back to the main article and tried bringing it up on the talk page, editors respond more favorably to major changes when they are discussed first (and WP:BOLD isn't an excuse here for not discussing first, because your changes were clearly going to be controversial considering your other recent edits). Masaruemoto 06:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The creation of the List of magnetic hills article was not pointy. One should be more careful when assuming bad faith, especially when one hasn't attempted to discuss the issue. The list, admittly too long at the moment, doesn't belong in the gravity hill article. That article is about the illusion of gravity hills, not their locations. As for my reasoning on the redirecte, you can see my edit summaries. Feel free to specifically address them here. Although please don't dwindle on your previous misunderstandings for the purpose of derision. 高 23:07, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Belated step three attempt
Talk:Chilion Jones

message: I deleted the line "he was known to some as a thief and going against the law to get his way" because it looks like it needs some kind of reference or footnote to support it; otherwise it looks like smearing or something. What do you think? Correct me if I'm wrong to delete this -- I'm not 100% sure of the WP protocol for this. Thanks! Smobri 18:19, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chilion Jones: thief?
Talk:Pentachlorophenol

message: The unsourced content that the article was replaced with on April 24, 2007 has the appearance of having been cut and pasted from elsewhere.  It is therefore a potential copyright violation.  A brief websearch doesn't turn up anything, so I'm leaving it in for now (with some of the older deleted content added back in too).  --Ed (Edgar181) 00:40, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential copyright violation 

message: From someone who worked in the telephone industry decades ago, where they regularly use chemical treatments on wood utility poles, I heard the term "penta" being used, short —for "pentachlorophenol".  Although telephone companies and other utilities tend to buy their poles from specialist suppliers, they often find a need to treat other wood components, such as cross-arms, locally.  This may be done by immersing or painting with a mix of Diesel oil and "penta". — QuicksilverT @ 19:09, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname
Talk:Lorentzian relativity

message: For some reason, this page was redirecting to Tom Van Flandern, who I do not believe is a Lorentzian.  Therefore, I have changed it to redirect to Lorentz transformation.  I considered redirecting to Special relativity, but ultimately decided that Lorentzian relativity should redirect to something having to do with Lorentz.  Unfortunately, the article Hendrik Lorentz itself seemed somehow inappropriate.
It is my hope, however, that this will become an actual page.  There is precious little information available about Lorentzian and neo-Lorentzian interpretations of Special Relativity.
Postmodern Beatnik 18:21, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Files for deletion/2007 March 30

message: The following images nominated for deletion are yet to have been resolved:
*Image:Kanuga.jpg
*Image:Schwa IPA symbol.png
*Image:IMG_0352.JPG
[o9o98  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.195.86.72 (talk) 09:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UNRESOLVED
Talk:Newminster Abbey

message: Links related to improvement: Clan Dunbar DNA, Descendants of Gospatric, ..., Juliana who married de Merlay has lots of descendants, too. jmswtlk (talk) 13:55, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: 1863 story of grandson of Juliana (historic fiction but can give some notion of the times to Americans of remote descent). Available, too, at Google. And, the Magna Carta theme will be very much present in 2015. jmswtlk (talk) 14:05, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dunbar link
Talk:Abd Allah ibn Abi Bakr

message: So I admittedly don't know much about Islam, so I don't know how to fix this but the link associated with the term "waiting period" at the end of this section does not go to a related article as much as I can tell. It goes to an article about the Saho People in Ethiopia and Eritrea. This doesn't make much sense given the context of the original link, it needs to be directed to something actually relevant to Islamic marriage customs I imagine. Or if there is no appropriate article or subsection to explain this concept, the link should be removed or the phrasing adjusted  Rs180216 (talk) 02:42, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage Section Waiting Period Link
Talk:Abd al-Rahman ibn Muljam

message: This article is really hard to understand, and is written like a religious tract.  Is it possible for someone to rewrite in a clearer and more modern style?  Many thanks!
The religious tone is so obvious that it is not even necessary to point it out. Of course, this is not an encyclopedia article, but it's still better than nothing.Giordaano (talk) 16:43, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I will try and fix it. Unflavoured (talk) 07:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have tried to cleanup the article. But having read similar articles before, I heavily suspect that the majority of the "Plot" and "Assassination" section are copy/pasted from somewhere on the web, even after cleanup. Unflavoured (talk) 07:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

text: Got a reliable source for that ?! Unflavoured (talk) 01:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

text: The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. RM by blocked account (non-admin closure) Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 22:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Ibn Muljim →  – Ibn Muljam is correct and more common in WP:RS. Ibn Muljam is used in the works of Wilferd Madelung, G. R. Hawting etc. Google Scholars shows 489 results for Ibn Muljam and 64 results for Ibn Muljim. Ngrams show far more results for Ibn Muljam than Ibn Muljim, same with Brill publishers for Ibn Muljam than Ibn Muljim and with JSTOR for Ibn Muljam than Ibn Muljim This is just a few examples, I can go on with thousands Azezlvi (talk) 18:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unintelligibility

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. RM by blocked account (non-admin closure) Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 22:44, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ibn Muljim →  – Ibn Muljam is correct and more common in WP:RS. Ibn Muljam is used in the works of Wilferd Madelung, G. R. Hawting etc. Google Scholars shows 489 results for Ibn Muljam and 64 results for Ibn Muljim. Ngrams show far more results for Ibn Muljam than Ibn Muljim, same with Brill publishers for Ibn Muljam than Ibn Muljim and with JSTOR for Ibn Muljam than Ibn Muljim This is just a few examples, I can go on with thousands Azezlvi (talk) 18:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 December 2022
Talk:University of New York, Tirana

message: I did some drastic chopping, but this is not supposed to be a brochure.Gilded Lily 18:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The homepage states that it is Elias Foutsis, the Infobox states that it's Agim Kukeli, while the wiki page states that it is Barbara Adams?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sefina (talk • contribs) 20:57, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is the rector of this Uni? 

message: this article still reads like a commercial for the university. it has not got a lot of important information and instead sounds like they are trying to convince us to attend the college. 188.172.109.140 (talk) 13:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an Advert
Talk:Engineering plastic

message: --Lebkuchenteile 18:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

message: (HDPE) - is not an engineering thermoplastic.
YSchary (talk) 13:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed High Density Polyethylene plastic HDPE from list 

message: The article is rather disappointing. One would expect a specific discussion of the characteristics that make a plastic to be "engineering", with some numbers rather than vague words like "more" or "very". Also the list of plastics should be sorted according to their special properties (e.g. "High-strength plastics", "Heat-resistant plastics", etc. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 02:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorting by properties, quantitative info 
Talk:Abdullah al-Harari

message: NPOV is obvious. User "Aicp1" (abbreviation for "Association of Islamic Charitable Projects", have a look at al-habash), as a loyal and faithful follower of Shaykh al-Harari, has written an enconium. "He is the great 'alim", "the prious worshipper"  
"He memorized by heart", "his intelligence and wonderful memory" etc. ... does not look encyclopedic at all. --89.56.175.238 23:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just took your username into account. It seemed obvious, to assume you and 66.240.41.13 to be the same person. Please accept my apology, if I were wrong. But I think your removal of NPOV-message to be revealing. You did not change the article to correct the problem and your argument "just relays the biography" doesn't help, as long as you don't give us any reliable references. --89.56.135.178 15:10, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: The others editors are right that this IS, in fact, written like an advertisement as well as quoting from AICP's own web-site and other sources. McKhan 13:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I, exactly, know what I am talking about. This is Wikipedia NOT Al-Azhar. Though, your claim being "approved" by Al-Azhar has been disputed. You have provided NO NEUTRAL / IMPARTIAL / ACADEMIC / INDEPENDENT references, quotes and research, as per Wikipedia guidelines to substantiate your "claims" in that article. Consequently, I will request you to NOT to remove those tags. Thanks. McKhan 13:07, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is an advertisement mostly quoting from AICP's own web-sit and sources. It is NOT NPOV 

message: Please, don't remove the tags. McKhan 13:01, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please, don't remove the tags. Thanks 

message: Should the article contain information about the grave visitation by a member of an organization? The following would be added: In 2009 Nuril Huda, chairman of Nahdlatul Ulama's dawah division visited his grave. 180.241.163.119 (talk) 23:50, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC about the Grave Visitation in the article 
Talk:Abdallah Somekh

message: I am studying about Haron where is it located  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.55.153.31 (talk) 15:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[''Haron in Genisis the place Abram left '']] 
Talk:Abdol-Ali Mirza Farman Farmaian

message: An editor has reinserted -- without following wp policy by adding inline directly supporting RS citations -- material that was challenged and deleted for lack of RS citations.  
That clearly violates wp policy. See wp:verifiability.
I have raised it with him here, and asked him to follow policy, but so far he has not. Discussion is here. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Sapphorain#Your_insertion_of_unreferenced_material_in_text 
--2604:2000:E010:1100:64FC:4B20:C241:B249 (talk) 08:30, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reinsertion of material challenged and deleted for lack of RS citations
Talk:Birmingham Town Hall

message: Re "It was illuminated again on 22 June 1911 for the coronation of King George V and Queen Elizabeth" this is either the wrong date or the wrong monarch. This section is not referenced, so I have assumed the wrong monarch and changed it to George V.--Shantavira|feed me 06:51, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illumination 