lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Boa (genus)

message: This page should be merged with or redirected to boa
Answer: 
----
: Not a very good idea because Boa is a genus and Boidae is a family; it will mess up the whole scheme of things CMonkey111 22:38, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request from  82.35.56.181

message: Here is a link to a page with a picture of a snake eating a pig: http://www.kinshi.com.ar/posteos/cerdo_serpiente.html . Can someone tell me what happens to the bones? (posted to article by 138.25.2.22, later moved here)
:In a healthy boa, the hydrochloric acid in the snake's stomach should dissolve everything, including the bones. Disease can affect HCl levels, which means a sick boa may vomit up the undigestable bits, or pass bone fragments in its stool. -- Hadal 05:51, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Question from 138.25.2.22

message: As I was fixing links I noticed this one. It properly redirects to Dominica and not Dominican Republic per this site. Just a note. Dekimasu 10:58, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to "Dominican"

message: At the top of the article, it says that ; this means that there are at least one other extant species. On the other hand, the article says that ; this means that, to the best of scientific knowledge, there were never any other members of this genus. Which is correct? עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 06:43, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: From 2008 to 2014 the article included the Sanzinia and Acrantophis species in Boa. Monotypic genus does not mean that were NEVER any other members of the genus. I'm not sure why the qualifier "extant" is included though. I'm not finding any versions of the article that included extinct species. Plantdrew (talk) 16:11, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other species? 

message: Boa Constrictor Imperator has recently been elevated to species status, with Sabogae and Longicauda as subspecies. That leaves the Amarali, Constrictor, Nebulosa, Occidentalis, and Orpheus as subspecies of the Boa Constrictor.
These things aren't absolute sciences, but splitting Boa Constrictor into BC and BI does seem to be universally accepted. Subspecies of these may be a different matter.
"There is interesting information for boa constrictor keepers! They are in family Boinae and subspecies of boa constrictor B. c. imperator are now species Boa imperator." http://arborealmonsters.blogspot.com/2014/10/boas-classification.html
"Boa imperator was formerly one of six recognized subspecies of the large constricting snake B. constrictor, but has been elevated to species status as B. imperator, occurring west of the Andes Mountains from Ecuador in northwestern South America northwards to Mexico in North America, and including the two subspecies B. c. longicauda and B. c. sabogae (although this recent change has not been universally accepted)." https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/112730
In short. The Boa genus should include two species. Constrictor and Imperator.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.253.73.146 (talk) 10:41, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boa Constrictor and Boa Imperator
Talk:Edward Jellico

message: Ronny Cox(Edward Jellico)was a brilliant addition to the Star Trek universe. I really enjoyed his confrontational, "I'm not Mr. Nice Guy" style, which was a refreshing contrast to the touchy-feely atmosphere of Picard's feminized Enterprise.  And just in case no one else "gets it," the name Jellico is famous in naval history: the commander of the British fleet at the battle of Jutland, in 1916, was John Jellicoe. dubeaux, June 3, 2006.
"Some parts of Starfleet began to maintain a four watch system after finding that it helped reduce fatigue and fatigue-related accident" Where's this from? pomegranate 02:04, Sep 12, 2004 (UTC)
* who played him on TV? (80.109.255.5 17:36, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I seem to recall an episode of Deep Space Nine where they mention that the Starship Cairo was destroyed by Dominion forces while patrolling the Romulan Neutral Zone.  Does anybody else remember this? --Raguleader 21:54, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's mentioned in In the Pale Moonlight -- but, it's under someone else's command. --EEMeltonIV 22:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starship Cairo's fate? 

message: Edward Jellico was not the "acting captain" of the Enterprise-D, nor was his assignment presented as "temporary" in any way. He was ordered by Starfleet to assume command of the ship, and Picard was reassigned to new duties. No limited term was mentioned for either of these changes; they were permanent. A formal transfer-of-command ceremony took place. Afterward, Jellico was fully and permanently the captain of the ship, as much as Picard had been. The fact that these changes were later reversed does not make them in any way "temporary", or indicate that Jellico was only "acting" as captain.
Starfleet's rationale for all of this was quite clear: Picard was being sent on a covert mission from which he quite probably would not return, and war with the Cardassians was imminent. It was necessary to detach Picard from the Enterprise in a way that left no doubt as to who was in command. Therefore, command of the ship was officially transferred to a new captain, leaving Picard free for reassignment. Had Picard not returned, Jellico would simply have remained as captain.
In a dramatic sense, Jellico's presence on the bridge was a temporary thing. But it's not correct to say that he was "given temporary command". Pat Berry 15:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not "acting" or "temporary"
Talk:Insurable risk

message: *merge and redirect  This content repeats what's in insurability.--Nowa (talk) 15:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[insurability]]
Talk:James Ling

message: * Most of this really belongs in a history of Ling-Temco-Vought. -Joseph 02:43, 2004 Sep 12 (UTC)
:Done. -Joseph 03:40, 2004 Sep 12 (UTC)
* The second paragraph appears to be lifted in its entirety (with adding "US" before "Navy" being the only difference) from the Handbook of Texas Online. Or maybe they copied this article wholesale. Either way, something seems to be not quite right here. 66.245.84.235 05:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vought

message: Vought history seems pretty striaghtforward until the LTV acquisition.  After that, it was split into numerous divisions, reorganized in different reincarnations, and finally emerged as it is today.  I'm just wondering if anyone has any input on how this should be handled.  Obviously the two articles (Vought and LTV) shouldn't overlap too much, but it seems like LTV was a part of Vought's history just as much as Vought played a critical role in LTV's history.  From what I gather, Vought Aeuronautics was a separate division under LTV Aerospace, and there was a separate Vought missiles or something group.  But afterward there were reorganizations and name changes.  I'm somewhat of a newbie at this and not too sure how this is handled.  Thanks.  Joshdboz 01:28, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: I have never heard the name spoken. Is it "vort" or "vowt" or "vow" or something else? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 07:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In an American accent it's pronounced the same as the words ought, thought, fought, etc. Joshdboz (talk) 09:10, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounced 

message: Does anyone know about what is going on with the merger? I just got offered a job there and was wondering if anyone from Vought out here knew if they were restructuring or laying off? I know they have been cutting off assemblers in Grand Prarie. The merger is official in July 2010 ... just wanted to see if anyone heard any rumors or news? Crowdaddy13 5/26/10  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.32.236.20 (talk) 08:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's interesting that you should mention Grand Prairie, the location of the plant.  The article says the company's headquarters are in Dallas, but are they really in Grand Prairie, which is a little southwest of Dallas, about halfway between Dallas and Fort Worth? — QuicksilverT @ 03:51, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triumph merger?
Category talk:Tsarinas of Russia

message: I'm dubious about this article title.  None of these women held the title "Tsarina" as their primary title.  They were all Empress of All Russia...I'm willing to tolerate the lists being at the Tsar article, but this just seems like it's encouraging technical incorrectness. john k 04:05, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: --71.236.0.127 (talk) 20:17, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marta Skavronskaya
Talk:Comparison of web browsers

message: Since Basilisk has been bought by a new development team & released 3 versions, is it time to remove its discontinued label & update its developer name, the latest version, & date? Basilisk's link leads to Pale Moon's article. There, Basilisk has a section & it's website is under External links. 2600:1702:3790:1520:54F4:2D4F:FE0D:1857 (talk) 22:14, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Even though Basilisk is no longer discontinued, it is only in beta, maybe for a long time or permanently.  Its website says "Basilisk is development software. This means that it should be considered more or less "beta" at all times". 99.7.207.171 (talk) 17:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basilisk arisen 

message: Midori's Engine should be updated to show the currently listed WebKit was used until 2019 or 2020 & Electron used afterwards. Edge & Firefox list 2 engines for 2 different periods. 2600:1702:3790:1520:3C02:35B0:6110:AC7D (talk) 05:41, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Midori Engine Update 

message: The Browser Engines on iOS should be WebKit I think. I dont know what would make up a good source for this though. Tedzards509 (talk) 22:50, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Browser engines on iOS 

message: The DuckDuckGo browser is available for Mac, Windows, iOS, and Android.
https://duckduckgo.com/windows
https://duckduckgo.com/duckduckgo-help-pages/get-duckduckgo/get-duckduckgo-browser-on-windows/
https://spreadprivacy.com/windows-browser-open-beta/
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3700768/duckduckgo-launches-privacy-first-windows-browser-in-beta.html 98.97.153.199 (talk) 05:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  DuckDuckGo Browser
Talk:Karl Dönitz/Archive 1

message: The reasoning behind why Hitler chose Doenitz as his successor is a matter of considerable doubt. Certainly, he mistrusted Himmler and Goering at that point and had stripped both of their positions prior to his death. But there are also reports that Hitler chose his naval chief because he felt that of all the German armed forces, only the Kriegsmarine had served him faithfully to the end, and therefore, he chose its leader. There's also speculation that Hitler knew the German armies would have to surrender, and that the Allies would not treat with someone known to have committed criminal acts. Doenitz certainly did not want to be the next Fuehrer, but he was able to negotiate a surrender that saved a lot of Germans from the Red Army.
We'll never know since Hitler is long since dead, but I think there's more to it than the article suggests.  John
----
and many historians would agree that Dönitz did not participate in and had no knowledge of the Holocaust.
:I would like to have some proof for the second part of the statement ("no knowledge") - I will remove it by now.
:--zeno 15:09, 22 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Generation Z

message: Gen z 1997-2009 2600:8800:4002:71D0:948:DAEB:C336:D6FD (talk) 05:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Jamedeus (talk) 06:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 May 2024 

message: According to the link below, the oldest generation z people were born in 1990. So, should we say that the early 1990s are starting birth years.:
https://www.businessinsider.com/zillennial-lives-with-parents-spends-on-luxury-goods-2023-1 Evope (talk) 03:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about the cusp generation Zillennials, not Generation Z. Dan Bloch (talk) 04:50, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: But I always thought it was the same thing, ok, lemme do it:  and  aren't synonyms. 177.105.94.73 (talk) 15:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest generation z people.
Category talk:Major League Baseball players by team

message: In my humble opinion, ALL the team categories need to be changed from singular to plural—for example, "Chicago Cub players" should be "Chicago Cubs players".
Generally, if a baseball fan uses the phrase "TEAM player", he or she will almost always use "Cubs player", "Mets player", "Yankees player", or the like—NOT the singular team name. Dale Arnett 05:58, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural nicknames 

message: I'm curious as to why some AA clubs are listed in this category and not others. For example, Cincinnati Kelly's Killers has a category here for players, but Richmond Virginians do not, yet both were members of the American Association. Is it some nuance I'm missing, or should I create categories here for the missing team(s)? Kathy A. 21:14, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: American Association clubs
Talk:Paul Zindel

message: What is The Fatty? I can't find anything about it on google. 72.229.246.198 (talk) 01:21, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Fatty? 

message: For The Pigman & Me, a novel, we give 1990 in the book article and 1992 here. YALSA gives 1993 in the 2002 Edwards Award citation. See also Talk:The Pigman & Me
What is the convention for dating plays? --copyright date if known? --world premiere? --some other premiere (commercial, Broadway, ...)? --or publication date? See Talk:The Effect of Gamma Rays on Man-in-the-Moon Marigolds regarding our and YALSA use of 1964, 1970, and 1971 for that play.
--P64 (talk) 18:48, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Works dates
Talk:Depression (mood)

message: Please note that this is the Wikipedia article that covers depressed mood as an everyday emotion, a subject in normal psychology.  It is not an article about the psychiatric disorder known as major depressive disorder, or "clinical depression" or sometimes simply "depression". Please add content specific to that or any other psychiatric syndrome (such as dysthymia, bipolar disorder, etc) to its respective article. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 04:34, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: An emotion is short-term, and a mood is long-term, so I'm not sure what you mean by your first sentence. Furthermore, the article mentions that depression is classified as a disorder medically (second sentence), but possibly the article's intent has drifted since you wrote your message. To me it seems like both articles (Depression (mood), Major depressive disorder) are both about the same topic, but from different perspectives; respectively layman and medical. I don't really see another difference. Yodo9000 (talk) 22:12, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Depression is a normal part of everyday life, but MDD is characterized by changes in mood that last about two weeks, and occur cyclically. Depression normally passes, but the cyclical nature of MDD can be life long. All mood disorders, as far as I'm aware, are cyclical in nature and tend to be very difficult to treat. Mood, while long-term, doesn't typically last more than two weeks, or recur. Lofenyy (talk) 08:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Notice'''

message: The first words in "addison's disease" and "cushing's syndrome" should be capitalized. 93.72.49.123 (talk) 00:24, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , thanks PlanetJuice (talk • contribs) 00:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 July 2023 

message: Hi. Link to the German article is missing. Cheers. 185.143.182.181 (talk) 23:03, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey there! If you could be so nice, where is it missing from? - MountainKemono (talk) 10:05, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Link 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kiki6789 (talk) 02:31, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 202 - Thu

message: — Assignment last updated by ProfHobbit (talk) 17:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing 10 - Both Classes
Talk:Edgar Quinet

message: It would be useful for someone with subject knowledge to tackle this passage:
"He was dismissed in 1846 by the Collège de France due to his adamant attacks on the Roman Catholic Church, exaltation of the revolution, and support for the oppressed nationalities of France and for supporting the theory that religion is a determining force in societies.[7]"
That last bit is unclear and even seems out of context for a 21st century reader, inconsistent with the rest of the sentence. What did he mean that "religion is a determining force in societies" and why was that part of the objection to him by established institutions? Random noter (talk) 00:33, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quinet's views
Talk:Moor macaque

message: I have posted a long comment in the Talk section of the main Macaque genus article, about the renaming of all the macaque species articles to "[Name] Macaque" (e.g. "Barbary Macaque") from their traditionally names (e.g. Barbary Ape).
Would you please take a look at that here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Macaque#Killer_Dolphins
And then correct this individual species article as necessary — I'm not sure which macaque species may have actually been called "[Name] Macaque" traditionally.
(And I hope you can see that the fact that I don't know that, after reading a Wikipedia article about the species, is why rewriting reality in Wikipedia is a problem.)
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.30.135 (talk) 12:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Killer Dolphins 

message: — Assignment last updated by Floudghi (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: GEOG 479 Primate Behaviour, Ecology and Conservation
Talk:Independent Filmmakers Cooperative of Ottawa

message: The organization described here doesn't seem to have the same name as the title of the page, and the one inbound link refers to a New York, not Ottawa, group. Hmmm. --rbrwrˆ 10:14, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: The organization

message: Added to User:DoubleBlue/Desk (Canada). -- Beland 20:26, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Taskforce log 

message: I recently joined the group and there have been some changes since this was written that I will update. 216.191.40.149 19:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating 
Talk:Nawab

message: Kalabagh was a Jagir, or noble estate and never a Prinvely State of the Indian Empire. It was not counted amongst the Pakistani Princely states either. Thus I am deleting Kalabagh from the list ruling Indian Nawabs.
This page is about the Title "Nawab".Not about the "Princely states of Former British India".There were many ancient states such as Kalabagh etc.Who did not comply fully with the british rules and so were not made into the so called"Princely states".But that does not change their place in history nor their rulers ancestral Titles.So restoring the title. Yoohooyoo (talk) 11:28, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Kalabagh

message: wuwt?  should redirect to Spiro Agnew or Patrick Buchanan
Am I the only one who finds the first sentence in the second paragraph incomprehensible?
"Since most of the Muslim rulers of the subcontinent had (like most otheriwse titled Hindu (maha)radjas and other princely states) accepted the authority of the Mughals at the height of this empire the term Nawab is often, but technically imprecise, as it was awarded to others and was not applied to every Muslim ruler, used to refer to any Muslim ruler in the subcontinent."
Can't somebody fix this?
*I'll have a go, but it IS confusingly complex Fastifex 14:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  nattering nabobs of negativism should not redirect here 

message: This section is complete nonsense. And should be removed. Kwenchin (talk) 00:59, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nawab of Indooroopilly 

message: Does anyone know why this article has a military unit infobox? It doesn't seem relevant, and other, similar pages (Duke, Khedive, Sultan, King) don't need one. The Royalty template should be sufficient. If there are no objections, I suggest it be deleted. Moonraker12 (talk) 14:37, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: "Nawab" units were all "ceremonial deputies" of the "Great Mogul (emperor)", this was their initial hierarchy in the antiquity of Asia.
10:13, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ceremonial deputy
Category talk:Humour

message: To be consistent with the Wikipedia article humour, would not a move to Category:Humour be appropriate. Mintguy (T)
: Perhaps better would be to switch the humour article back to humor, where the article started (it was changed, in violation of WP guidelines, some time ago). --Cultural Freedom talk 2007-08-28 21:01 21:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible move

message: I think we should, it's disambiguating, and it is humor. It's just a link. Go to image and there's a link to Wikipedia:image. Let's just put it in; it's not a paper encyclopedia, so there's no space requirement, and after all, it's just a link. --HereToHelp (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Include link to [[:Category:Wikipedia humor]] or not?
Talk:Identical twin

message: I've assimilated the information from this article into twin.  I'm hoping to build as complete a possible single article and don't think that identical twin warrants its own article any more.  I'll turn this into a redirect unless someone has any objections. violet/riga (t) 12:21, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Now done. violet/riga (t) 11:58, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged with [[Twin]]
Talk:Pakora

message: In Glasgow, Pakora is popular after an evening visit to the pub; similar to buying fish and chips or a kebab. Is this the same in other UK cities, or is it unique to Glasgow? Edward 12:40, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The most popular pakoras are. Palak Pakora - Delicious and healthy pakora made of spinach. Paneer Pakora - Cottage Cheese fried in gram flour. Pyaz Pakora - Onion pakora most commanly eaten."
Most popular? Where? It's 1. Onion, 2. Chicken, 3. Mushroom, 4. Fish, around here (West Central Scotland). Could you be more specific about where your information relates to, and your sources?
potatoscone 09:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most popular 

message: I was under the impression that pakoras are traditionally made from chick pea flour (besan flour) and are a sort of deep fried dumpling rather than a battered item. Perhaps in the UK and particularly in Scotland where they batter and deep fry pizza slices, pies and even kebabs, "pakora" has taken on a new meaning. Here in Australia, pakoras are generally only found in Hare Krishna restaurants, where they are a dumpling accompaniment. --MichaelGG 10:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gram Flour? 

message: It should be pakodi, can someone please change?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.120.240.17 (talk) 03:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I created the two redirects Pakodi and Pakōḍī. But see talk there. Done? -- B.S. Lawrence (talk) 16:46, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Pakora is known by several names across India namely, pakodi, bhajji, phulki, phulauri, etc. Same words may be used in different regions for slightly different thing. Panipuri in Awadh region is known as Paani ka batasa and Gol-gap'pe in Western India and Gup-chup in Bihari languages.--Sayed Mohammad Faiz Haidertcs 04:58, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change