Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment

message: Well, I've now moved all of the FA discussions to their own subpages, accessible through Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment/. That cut the amount of text on the page from 129 KB to 72. I've also modified  to make the process much more automatic; when an assessment discussion is archived, the template looks for the existence of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Tropical cyclones/Assessment/ page. If it finds it, then the template points directly to the archive (see for example, Talk:Hurricane Mitch. If the page does not exist, then it checks whether the assessed parameter was passed, as the template worked before. 
As for archiving other non-FA discussions: feel free to do so, just don't archive anything too recent. I just did the FAs as a first pass. Titoxd(?!?) 05:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pruning knife 

message: Due to the significant number of articles that have moved from B to GA in the last couple weeks, I'd like to see the following articles reassessed to see if they can go to A or even onto FAC. There is a very low number of A-class articles and a high number of GA-class articles due to a lot of recent additions (and several more awaiting).
The list is as follows, in chronological order:
*Hurricane Audrey (1957)
*Hurricane Linda (1997)
*Hurricane Alberto (2000)
*Hurricane Karen (2001)
*Hurricane Gustav (2002)
*Hurricane Danny (2003)
*Hurricane Kate (2003)
*Subtropical Storm Nicole (2004)
*Hurricane Maria (2005)
*Hurricane Ophelia (2005)
*Tropical Storm Debby (2006)
Any thoughts on them? CrazyC83 02:09, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right off the bat, I remember leaving assessment comments in the talk pages for Karen and Danny. I haven't had the time to review the rest... Titoxd(?!?) 02:16, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

text: (Regarding Alberto) What's the GOES one? Do you mean "once" instead of "one"? I'm sort of confused. RaNdOm26 09:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: GOES is a program of NASA satellites, see Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite. – Chacor 10:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I already know GOES is a satellite. So, what is the GOES pic? RaNdOm26 11:08, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This one. – Chacor 11:12, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recently added GA-class articles

message: *Cyclone Gamede
*Cyclone Inigo
*Hurricane Karen (2001)
*Subtropical Storm Andrea (2007)
*Tropical Storm Marco (1990)
These five articles are GA's of mine, and I personally believe that are A-class worthy. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:16, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The ones that pops out at me the most are Alberto and Florence 1988, and maybe Daniel. Danny is pretty short on information other than storm history, so I'd prfer to see that stay at GA. And Florence 2006 is really close, but one or two of the references aren't in  form. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 15:29, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For Florence, I fixed the lone ref not in cite web. For Danny, length is not an issue for A-class articles (look at TS Ana from the same year). If it's comprehensive, and it meets the other criteria, shouldn't it be promoted? ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:00, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, Florence 2006 is good now, and I guess Danny is A-class worthy, but I'd still like to see more information for an A-class article. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 19:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: About Danny, while more info would be great, it's pretty much maxed out, since it never affected land! ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current GA-articles proposed as A-class articles 

message: Hi! We at WP:INDIA are debating the introduction of C-class articles for our assessment. As this is one of the successful projects that use C-class, could someone involved in assessment please weigh in on Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics#C class articles? We need to know:
# If the implementation of C-class has been effective in general?
# Does C-class articles involve more red tape?
# Are the lines of distinction between Start and C, and Start and B classes blurred?
# Does C-class complicate the assessment process?
Eagerly awaiting feedback. Thanks, =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  C-class articles for WP INDIA 

message: If anyone is still here, should we re-activate this page? YE  Pacific Hurricane 21:17, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone?