lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bankra

message: Unless (as might be the case in India) there are very many persons who count as neither male nor female, the average literacy rate cannot be higher than both the male and female percentages--SilasW 15:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted. I think that was a problem with the calculations and wording used by a bot while creating the article or while adding demographic data. My understanding is that sexwise literacy numbers were calculated as #<male/female>literates/#total literates and by mistake of wording, it was claimed to be like 'x% of males are literate and (100-x)% of females are literate'; rather it should have been 'x% of literates are male and (100-x)% of literates are female'. Alternatively, other formulae should have been used. I have access to the data. So, I am putting it in correct words using %of literates among male/female. Thanks. --GDibyendu (talk) 12:07, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No matter how the figures were derived they are manifest nonsense. A) 57 is less than 59.5 and B) if the population is roughly 50/50 M/F then the mean of 61 and 53 is 55 not 57. This arithmetical inconsistency can be found in other Indian town articles.Pls talk if you need to about the matter but not about my observing.--SilasW (talk) 11:24, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics disputed 

message: Please answer. 202.142.73.246 (talk) 11:26, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's ward no of Bankra?
Talk:The Dark Side of the Sun (film)

message: The page (as well as the Brad Pitt page) says filming was interrupted in 1988 by the Yugoslavian Civil War, but this did not start until 1991.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.253.44.148 (talk) 11:53, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Delays due to Yugoslavian Civil War
Talk:Maksimilijan Vanka

message: could you reconsider the NPOV template you added back in 2016? The current text doesn't strike me as particularly problematic in this aspect. If you feel it is still applicable, please state your concerns here. GregorB (talk) 18:34, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Jeet (1996 film)

message: This article isn't much more than a list of dates and actors\crewmem. When behind Jeet, "(1996 film)" wasn't put, nobody could have even possible known it was a movie! -The Bold Guy- 13:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Malcolm Campbell

message: Most of the Campbell images are now listed for deletion at Commons, see :Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Images from the Florida Photographic Collection Andy Dingley (talk) 23:34, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulk image deletion 

message: What did happen to the site "racingcampbells.com"? Is there any possibility to replace the linked articles? ----130.83.23.163 (talk) 15:19, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: archive.org will probably have it  Andy Dingley (talk) 17:05, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "racingcampbells.com" 

message: Are there any opinions regarding records indicating an earlier world speed record by Sir Campbell at Beach of the Danish Wadden Sea island Fanø (Fano), reaching an average speed of 219 km/h in his 18-liter 350 HP, Sunbeam racing car "Bluebird"?
Featured in:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hG2BUHlm5kY
Brgds
Bent Overgaard  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.27.44.3 (talk) 12:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: He had already exceeded the existing record when he drove  216 km/h near Saltburn in 1922. Unfortunately the time was measured with a handheld stopwatch and the AIACR did not recognize the record. ----130.83.23.163 (talk) 17:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible earlier, 1923, world speed record by Sir Campbell 
Talk:Malcolm Champion

message: The article says Malcolm's birthdate is 12 Nov 1883 and that he was born in Auckland. There is no birth entry for Malcolm in the New Zealand Births, Deaths and Marriages registry. There is one in the Norfolk Island Births, Deaths and Marriages registry however. I have a scan of the relevant entry here. It lists the birth date as 10 Nov 1882. I'm not sure how to cite that in the article though.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doublecnz (talk • contribs) 23:57, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Date and Location Incorrect
Talk:Malcolm Knowles

message: It's interesting to see a biography of an educator -- we have very few -- but somehow I felt at the end a bit dissatisfied. Education, degrees, positions, dates... Yes, yes, but what did he actually do that made him noteworthy?  Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:16, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What did he do? 
Talk:Malcolm Muir (publisher)

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Malcolm Muir was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 16:32, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Mamie Smith

message: The image :File:Mamie Smith-Complete Works Vol 1.png which I originally uploaded, used on this page, will be deleted if a fair use rationale is not added to justify its use in this article. I'm not interested in writing one right now so please add one if you want to keep it. Dcoetzee 22:00, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't think we can really justify using a non-free image of an album cover in this context. We have a free image of the subject, and the album cover is not discussed at all in the article.--BelovedFreak 22:17, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image requiring fair use rationale 
Talk:Manès Sperber

message: Please see: LibraryThing Manès Sperber (1905–1984) and follow the picture link(s). Regards ‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 20:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture
Talk:Manfred von Ardenne

message: A book about V2 rockets and some German nuclear research suggested that by using his centrifuge to seperate Uranium isotopes, Von Ardenne and Germany became the first nuclear power. This meant that the Germans beat the Americans to seperating Uranium by about two months.
A later reprinting of the same book included a denial from Von Ardenne to the affect that the centrifuge had been unused for the duration of WW2. The Americans still remain the first nuclear power
Another TV account suggested that Von Ardenne proved of little real use to the Russians as being a "dabbler" in many fields rather than the "in depth" physicists that the Russians really required.AT Kunene (talk) 09:41, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  centrifuges 
Talk:Manierre Dawson

message: This page on a very significant American painter needs more illustration of his work. Almost all the examples of his work are in the United States, and very few are in Europe. WP would do a service by getting more illustrations of his work. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:06, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: need for papers & critics too: see this. --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 11:21, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as the account doesn't illustrate the work, it takes us no further forward (in a WP sense). Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:40, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for illustration 
Talk:Manly Wade Wellman

message: I have read all the "John" stories, and Wellman never refered to the character as "Silver John".  This was a label dreamed up by his later publishers, after most of the "John" stories had already been written and published.  I changed the intro to reflect this.
: Also, a "Silver John" story appears in the December 1951 issue of F&SF, available on Internet Archive. So putting him in the 1960s section is inaccurate. 100.15.127.199 (talk) 02:03, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Silver" John 
Talk:Manning Coles

message: I am starting to expand this article and add refs.  I believe Manning Coles influence in the development of the 20th century spy novel has been considerably underestimated.  I will be working step-by-step, rather than sand-boxing the whole article until done so please feel free to add to the Article or Talk pages.  Please notify me on my talk page if you have major issues.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by D A Patriarche (talk • contribs) 04:35, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: I appreciate the information about Cyril, but I would like to know more about the other half of the partnership 2600:1702:2340:67A0:A97F:E21D:FFEA:14D7 (talk) 22:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Adelaide?
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Nueva Segovia

message: Speedy criteria '3 No content whatsoever. Any article consisting only of links elsewhere (including hyperlinks, category tags and "see also" sections), a rephrasing of the title, and/or attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title. This does not include disambiguation pages.'
is not met. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 15:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The version that was tagged for speedy deletion was . The only thing that couldn't be made up from the title alone is "in the Philippines". As such, this is no context or no content. SalaSkan 15:40, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You should indeed improve your logical thinking, before anymore such taggings that disturb Wikipedia content creation. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 17:05, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Article definitely lacks context? What is Archdiocese? Where (or what) is Nueva Segovia? Cant I even read the first line without drifting off to a hunting mission? --soum talk 17:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Eugene, this is still on the edge.  We all feel in our hearts that it's a significant place/organizational center, but that feeling has to be borne out in our page.  I do not know anything about Eugene Onegin, but I feel sure that there is a lot to say.  Having an article that says, "This is a major work of literature" really wouldn't be acceptable to retain, nor would it represent work that would need to be preserved under GFDL.  It would be, instead, a placeholder -- reserving a spot and marking it without the benefit of any real writing.  It is in fact because we should honor our authors that we shouldn't preserve predicate nominatives as if they were writing.  They're not.  Geogre 16:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Lito Mayo

message: User:Mo Billings who instigated this template has been removed and blocked indefinitely due to abuse - sockpuppet of World's Lamest Critic. Michael (talk) 00:50, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  appeal to remove COI template
Talk:Mantovani

message: This doesn't read like an encyclopedia; there also seems to be a link in the middle of the section - I think that external sites should be listed at the end of the article. If there's no objections, I'll tone it down in a few days time.
Apepper (talk) 15:55, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 2009 concert reads like an advert 

message: https://www.vintagemusic.fm/artist/mantovani/ appears to be an unattributed copy of this article, some time around January 2012. WP:Mirrors and forks#Non-compliance process indicates that only people who hold part of the copyright on an article can take action about this, so I'm posting it here, in case anybody who does is moved to take action. --ColinFine (talk) 15:08, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unattributed copy 

message: Shouldn't his son (and well-known composer/conductor) born 1974 - Bruno Mantovani also be mentioned as one of his children?
Invulgo (talk) 18:44, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no known connection, but; Bruno is definitely *not* his son. 71.112.242.12 (talk) 14:21, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bruno Mantovani 

message: In the last paragraph of the section entitled, 'Music style and influences', the editor states that "Mantovani did not always get respect from his fellow musicians".  In an attempt to prove this somewhat broad assertion, the editor merely cited a reference wherein Paul McCartney stated his preference that a proposed addition of strings to one of his compositions, as suggested by George Martin, should not sound "like Mantovani".  One would be well advised not to read anything into such a harmless statement.  In other words, simply because McCartney didn't wish his composition to be altered to include the styling characteristics of Mantovani does not in any way imply a lack of respect for him, musically or otherwise.  The entire paragraph should either be expanded to definitively prove that McCartney actually lacked respect for Mantovani, or, it should be removed. 71.112.242.12 (talk) 14:06, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requesting removal of speculative, presumptive and likely, erroneous, conclusion  

message: The Mantovani Orchestra continued to perform after Mantovani's death, but I don't know under whose leadership or when it broke up.
The link to the official Mantovani website is dead.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.215.49.69 (talk) 02:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Posthumous Performances
Talk:Sonchus sinuatus

message: Is this the same as D. micrantha? Mark Hurd (talk) 01:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: as can be seen by the photos in the World Conservation Monitoring Centre 1998 links. Mark Hurd (talk) 08:44, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same? 
Talk:Ben Belitt

message: Discussion page created ReadQT 15:20, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The second external link is currently one which has gone bad (domain no longer in use.)  
Third ext link is to a page no longer on that server at that URL.
I will take on this page if no one else claims it.  I at least know his Neruda translations.
G. Robert Shiplett 13:52, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken link 
Talk:Sonchus micranthus

message: Is this the same as D. macrantha? Mark Hurd (talk) 01:16, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: as can be seen by the photos in the World Conservation Monitoring Centre 1998 links. Mark Hurd (talk) 08:44, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same? 
Talk:Sonchus neriifolius

message: Dendroseris Neriifolia: 103.192.116.29 (talk) 16:11, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dendroseris Neriifolia:
Talk:Manuel Ponce

message: Why the :Category:Musical hoaxes?  There's nothing in the article to support that. --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 11:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Hoax?

message: Isn't Manuel María Ponce more usual? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:28, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Manuel María Ponce
Talk:Marc Aaronson

message: Is it really necessary to mention the nomination for a Darwin Award? So far as I know, anyone can nominate anyone for a Darwin Award, and, from what I know of the circumstances of Aaronson's death, I'd say this was a nomination that should have been rejected out of hand. Astronomical observatories are inherently dangerous places, with all the heavy and high-voltage equipment, and Aaronson's mistake was understandable if tragic. I don't see a need to impugn his intelligence this way. 128.165.87.144 (talk) 20:02, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.—RJH (talk) 21:20, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darwin Award
Talk:Frontalis muscle

message: This page identifies itself as synonymous with Occipitofrontalis muscle, which exists as a separate page. The two pages have slightly different descriptions and rather different pictures, and I don't know the subject material well enough to figure out which is correct.
:Hi. The two are not synonymous. The occipitofrontalis is composed of both the frontalis muscle and the occipitalis muscle. Both reading the text it does not state this clearly. I will take a look on the three articles and try to sort it out... maybe first tomorrow. Good call by the way. JakobSteenberg (talk) 21:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I gave the three articles a overhaul. Would you mind taking a look at them to see if this clears things up? JakobSteenberg (talk) 14:51, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with 'Occipitofrontalis muscle'? 

message: The frontalis muscle (from Latin 'frontal muscle') is a muscle which covers parts of the forehead of the skull. Some sources consider the frontalis muscle to be a distinct muscle. However, Terminologia Anatomica currently classifies it as part of the occipitofrontalis muscle along with the occipitalis muscle.[2] 73.44.84.215 (talk) 16:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cc 

message: You 73.44.84.215 (talk) 16:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The frontalis muscle (from Latin 'frontal muscle') is a muscle which covers parts of the forehead of the skull. Some sources consider the frontalis muscle to be a distinct muscle. However, Terminologia Anatomica currently classifies it as part of the occipitofrontalis muscle along with the occipitalis muscle.[2]
Talk:Russian War Relief

message: A little support material, no idea how to include it (http://kerryon.blogspot.com/2005/02/passion-of-bloodlust.html):
If it's religion they want, give them instead Mahalia Jackson, performing with the Duke Ellington Orchestra in the Duke's original suite "Black, Beige and Brown", a concert at Carnegie Hall in 1943 to uplift and benefit the Russian War relief fund, to help in the fight against the crushing invasion by Nazi Germany. Imagine, in an era of segregation, a negro orchestra encouraging a godless country to keep up the fight against Hitler, with Mahalia Jackson's spirited, woeful voice singing about slaves who seek strength, and who cherish their Sunday day of rest so that they can replenish their spirit to keep on: 
And it all went to help fund global militant atheism, unbelievable! TMLutas 02:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carnegie Hall Concert
Talk:Levator palpebrae superioris muscle

message: "It broadens and becomes the levator aponeurosis. This portion inserts on the skin of the upper eyelid, as well as the superior tarsal plate."
Am I right that in some people of East Asian origin it only inserts on the superior tarsal plate, not the skin? And should we add that to the article? --Thathánka Íyotake (talk) 20:53, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: East Asian eyelids
Talk:Marcel J. E. Golay

message: Editors might find the following link helpful:
Biography of Gourlay written by his son ticket:2017070610010362 --S Philbrick(Talk) 15:45, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly useful information 

message: The Van Deemter equation applies to packed column chromatography. The patent on capillary column technique expired in 1975, and capillary analysis is wide spread. Golay was the inventor of capillary GC columns.Golay made his discovery by his fundamental HETP equation. WalterSpeaksma (talk) 10:56, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Golay HETP equation
Talk:Haurvatat

message: About Haurvatât and the constellation GEMINI:
remember this is only possible when referring to the MODERN calendar.
This modern interpretation could lead to a misconception.
I'm working on a different interpretation (based on comparative religion)
in which the modern calendar and the original one DO NOT MATCH !.. JamiEric (talk) 18:16, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Iris sphincter muscle

message: A better diagram would be helpful to demonstrate the orientation of the muscles. 86.139.29.95 (talk) 14:03, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagram

message: Should be named pupillary sphincter, or sphincter pupillae. Too general at present.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.194.13.102 (talk) 05:30, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 
Talk:Marco Reginelli

message: *This page is the result of the extensive research that I have done concerning the individual described.   This information has never been published.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.165.132 (talk) 01:38, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He did like chicken muggest 2601:981:C07F:9F20:D07D:2BAA:B23:8C11 (talk) 18:51, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poop
Talk:Orbicularis oculi muscle

message: I think we should add something that says humans have very little control over this muscle, and that it shows our true emotions before we can edit them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.142.116.84 (talk) 02:10, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This isn't a contradiction per se, but there seems to be an inconsistency between orbicularis oculi muscle, which says (in the infobox) that the orbicularis oculi is innervated by 2 branches of the facial nerve (temporal and zygomatic), and the list of muscles of the human body which only mentions 1 branch (zygomatic).
Should the list of muscles page include the temporal branch? Or is the orbicularis oculi page wrong to include it? Hopefully someone can get this straightened out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.96.112.194 (talk) 10:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency 

message: Will wikipedia accept the following link: Facial and Eyelid Anatomy? תיל"ם (talk) 16:09, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link
Talk:Pirlo (aperitivo)

message: the Italian page has more information. Don't speak it and the google translation isn't good enough. MDSNYDER 15:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Inferior oblique muscle

message: Under "Additional images" the images for
 
Eye movement of inferior rectus muscle, superior view
Eye movement of superior rectus muscle, superior view
Eye movement of superior oblique muscle, superior view
Eye movement of inferior oblique muscle, superior view
all have arrows that are optical illusions.  Each arrow can be seen as rotating clockwise OR counterclockwise. Each of the four images is, therefore, confusing and should be revised.  There are ways of showing such arrows as unambiguously rotating clockwise or unambiguously rotating counterclockwise; and such arrows should be substituted in, or other images with unambiguous arrows should be substituted for, the existing four images by whoever placed the images on this page.  --Wikifan2744 (talk) 23:42, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The arrows are behind the silver bar. Don't see the issue. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 00:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: In other than print sizes somewhat larger than Wikipedia standard, it is not clear that the arrows are passing behind the silver bars.  Not everyone has 20/20 vision and we shouldn't demand that they do.  Further, Wikipedia should be usable to a wide audience, not merely to cognoscenti.  A possibly simple fix would be to widen the silver bars.  --Wikifan2744 (talk) 03:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four arrows are optical illusions
Talk:Marcus Jastrow

message: It is written in the article: "In the preface to this work, Jastrow sharply criticized those linguistic and etymological scholars who claimed that obscure terms in Talmudic literature are primarily derived from Greek. Jastrow held that Greek influence on Talmudic Aramaic was minimal, and that most obscure terms could be much more simply be traced to Hebrew origins"
Does anyone who has utilized "The Jastrow" find this ironic, as the vast majority of his dictionary's  entries contain Greek. I'm serious; is this something that merits inclusion in the article? [[User:Valley2city|Valley</span-2city 05:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek is minimal? 

message: Jastrow's dictionary in 2 volumes is here:  https://archive.org/details/dictionaryoftarg01jastuoft
https://archive.org/details/dictionaryoftarg02jastuoft
96.255.124.231 (talk) 22:56, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  availability 
Talk:Marek Hłasko

message: Marek Hłasko looks the oldest-looking 35 year-old known to science outside those rare ageing diseases. He was obviously doing something amazingly wrong - hence not only dying when he did but also looking like he did when he did.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.29.26.52 (talk) 01:59, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marek Hłasko looks the oldest-looking 35 year-old known to science