Talk:London Bridge station

message: The article currently states that the station opened in 1838, then goes on in the chronology to detail the two stations dating from 1836 and 1839. If the chronology is correct (citation???) then the summary above it is wrong. Does someone have access to some reliable (and citable) information? StephenDawson 14:31, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some good data at kent rail, never had a chance to amke full use of the excellent site across wikipedia. Pickle 19:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1836, 1838 or 1839? 

message: "London Bridge is one of three rail termini in London not to have either a direct connection to, or within easy walking distance of, the Circle Line, the others being Marylebone and Waterloo."
You come out of the station, you're at the southern end of the bridge, you cross the bridge, you're at the north end of the bridge, you're at Monument, voila, circle line.  From an admittedly rough squint at Multimap, it's maybe 7-800m.  From memory, maybe 5-6 minutes.  Do we really live in an age where 700m is considered too far to be easy walking distance!?
Now, before anyone jumps in... I realise it's not going to be so easy, and you don't cover 700m in 6min, if you're of low mobility (eldery, disabled, wearing stupid shoes, etc).
Which I suppose brings me to my point that this phrase is sufficiently subjective to be arguably meaningless in an encyclopaedic context.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.7.47 (talk) 19:24, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "easy walking distance" seems like a very debatable phrase 

message: My understanding is that the station was originally called Tooley Street. Also Deptford is, or was, outside London. Chevin (talk) 09:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the old problem of the use of the word 'London' being anachronistic. I have reworded this so that it does not create the misunderstandig. 79.75.17.137 (talk) 17:10, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions of 5th.December 2008

message: I have changed the comments about not stopping after 2011 as they are complete rubbish.  I know that this is what is stated on the Thameslink Programme website but the website is wrong.  After lots of emails to both FCC and Networkrail I believe have established that the true situation.  Nothing will change prior to October 2012. No final decision has been made as to whether Thameslink will serve London Bridge in the off-peak between 2012 and 2015.  This is consistent with Network Rail's RUS for South London.
FCC did subsequently correct the website but only in one place.  I pointed out the other reference but they have not changed it.--Pedantic of Purley (talk) 04:17, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Thameslink serving at London Bridge after 2011

message: The train services provided are definitely out-of-date and inconsistent with the list for Charing Cross station which appears to be more up-to-date.  I know for a lamentable fact that the 2 tph to Smitham have been withdrawn but am not sufficiently knowledgeable to update the list.  Ideally it should be correct.  Failing that we should state that this was prior to 14 December 2008 or just remove it.--Pedantic of Purley (talk) 19:04, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: National Rail - Train services

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on London Bridge station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140410040141/http://www.networkrail.co.uk/managed-stations/ to http://www.networkrail.co.uk/managed-stations/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:53, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Does anyone have any further details or a better source for this incident in November 1954? Mjroots (talk) 07:03, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Car no. 10943 of unit 4102 was "damaged, London Bridge, 12.54 and repaired". --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:10, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you be so kind as to add the incident to this and the 4 SUB articles please|#? Mjroots (talk) 13:08, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That's all there is... --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:38, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: November 1954 incident