Talk:Sheela Lambert

message: It's nice to se that you have been continuing to get info for this page, however having left it in limbo with too much non-relevent as well as duplicate info has put it in danger of being removed.  See comments in this discussion here . 
If your current schedule precludes you from having the time to complete it please tell someone so that it can be fixed by someone else prior to the mods removing it.  Thanks CyntWorkStuff 21:47, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Updating with more current info. RahadyanS 12:24, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't doubt that Westheimer and Browne made those assertions, but I added citations needed since none were included initially. I'll look for online and/or print citations this weekend. RahadyanS 14:07, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old comments 

message: I hadn't known until today that Bialogue had been formed in 2005 from the merger of BiPac (founded 1989) and Coalition for Unity and Inclusion (founded 2000). RahadyanS 04:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, thanks for the explanation. That will get sorted out in subsequent revisions. RahadyanS 04:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Self-education while copy editing

message: :The following comments were made on a peer review page for some reason - there was no actual peer review. I've copied them here for keeping. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 17:26, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied from another page 

message: This is someone's chatty CV, not the proper subject of a wikipedia article. What's next?  Shall we expect to see flattering entries for Ladies Active in Garden Clubs in the Midlands lauded here?  -- chas —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.146.75.231 (talk) 16:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This looks like a well documented article but most of the items are all self-referential giving the strong appearance of someone trying to make themselves seem more important than they are.  It is also suggested that an examination be made of the articles about other bi activists with unimpeachable notability like Loraine Hutchins, Lani Ka'ahumanu and Robyn Ochs and this article and if kept it be brought more in to line with those. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.146.75.231 (talk) 19:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cites from New York Blade, Washington Blade, and the Naomi Tucker book are enough to pass WP:N.  I'm removing the Notability tag. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 00:39, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. RahadyanS 00:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Sadly, she does not meet wp notability standards. 2603:7000:2143:8500:CFF:8358:51D1:5EED (talk) 02:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|Notability?]] 

message: see here: List of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community centers to find the New York one and I put in redirects too ~~ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BiAndBi (talk • contribs) 18:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: sorry put in the tilda things wrong will get the hang of this someday BiAndBi — Preceding undated comment added 19:07, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  there was already a listing for the LGBT Center 

message: the correct name is New York Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, & Transgender Film Festival BiAndBi — Preceding undated comment added 9:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  there is a listing for [[NewFest]] 

message: Schrandit, you had the temerity to demand a citation FOR A CITATION.  If you revert again, I won't edit war, I'll simply report you.  Try me.  Spotfixer (talk) 06:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Where did I do that chief? - Schrandit (talk) 07:13, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Spotfixer is referring to this edit in which a fact tag was added to the title of a published report listed in the bibliography section.  -- Banjeboi 09:46, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

text: That report was not a citation.  It was listed as an accomplishment and it is one that should be referenced. - Schrandit (talk) 18:05, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't be absurd: a report name is its own citation. Spotfixer (talk) 18:55, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Show me where it say that. - Schrandit (talk) 19:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, let's look at the big picture here. On this subject, your efforts seem to have been focussed solely on adding voluminous cite tags. On a limited basis, and on items likely to be seen as contested, cite tags can be quite helpful so that editors looking to improve an article have something to focus on if they need help prioritizing. At this point this article is in much better shape than most and I've found nothing to suggest that any deception, false claims or unsourced negative information is lurking. In general, items in bibliographies are not sourced, at all, in any way. I believe most if not all readers/editors accept these in good faith based on the rest of the article and utilizing their WP:Brain. Having gone over the article I have little doubt that everything there is actually accurate. The article embodies much of what one would expect to see in a veteran bisexual activist in NYC who specializes in writing and editing. Her only downfall is not having her own publicist to ensure her name appears in print more often and that her public events are well documented. This lead me to believe there is a lot more we don't know about. As a friendly suggestion, please using fact tags more judiciously and consider attending to articles you are actively editing by adding sourcing rather than filling them up with fact tags for others to research.  -- Banjeboi 21:26, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fake citation requests 

message: This was removed but I believe tenditiously, it was also accompanied by a few more random fact tags. The above statement hardly seems exceptional or controversial so I personally don't see the need to delete it but as it has been contested I wanted to not the removal here for future efforts if someone can cite it.  -- Banjeboi 16:45, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed 

message: In looking for another cite I found a reasonable interview with Lambert that could help beef up the early history section:
*  Bi activist Sheela Lambert is interviewed by GLAAD for Celebrate Bisexuality Day
 -- Banjeboi 16:45, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Interview

message: Does anyone know why Examiner.com is a blacklisted site link? I tried to add a link to Lambert's column on Examiner.com and was told that all Examiner.com links are blacklisted. 
108.1.116.245 (talk) 20:42, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Because Examiner usually fails WP:RS and has a history of spamming. Niteshift36 (talk) 18:47, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is Examiner.com a blacklisted link? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Sheela Lambert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928030506/http://www.washingtonblade.com/2006/10-6/news/national/bi.cfm to http://www.washingtonblade.com/2006/10-6/news/national/bi.cfm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080604135905/http://www.sovo.com:80/2005/11-4/view/actionalert/actionalert.cfm to http://www.sovo.com/2005/11-4/view/actionalert/actionalert.cfm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Sheela Lambert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100620140721/http://thetaskforce.org/TF_in_news/07_0328/stories/southernvoice_bihealthreport.pdf to http://www.thetaskforce.org/TF_in_news/07_0328/stories/southernvoice_bihealthreport.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050503201607/http://www.planetout.com:80/people/columns/szymanski/archive/20010702.html to http://www.planetout.com/people/columns/szymanski/archive/20010702.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:14, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Sheela Lambert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060827023936/http://www.bimagazine.org/nonfict/pages/feature8.html to http://www.bimagazine.org/nonfict/pages/feature8.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sheela Lambert. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090123230906/http://nwsa.org/cfps/journalcfps.php to http://www.nwsa.org/cfps/journalcfps.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726102420/http://www.gibbin.org/biwelcome.html to http://www.gibbin.org/biwelcome.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Much of this article is unsourced - and all of that material is self-laudatory. Unless this is fixed, quickly, it should be deleted. --2603:7000:2143:8500:CFF:8358:51D1:5EED (talk) 09:24, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *You're not wrong. This is a barely notable writer and it sounds like a big puff piece. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:26, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work. I'm still not sure that this is notable by wp standards. You think it is .. barely? --2603:7000:2143:8500:80F9:819E:BE0C:4247 (talk) 19:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *I was being generous. I was the one who stuck the notability tag on it in 2012. If it were nominated, I'd likely vote delete. Niteshift36 (talk) 17:04, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced