Talk:Chytridiomycosis

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: The page had an  tag, but I don't see any explanation on what was the reason or what is needed. If needed, please provide some info. --Ljvillanueva (talk) 06:42, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert tag 

message: "global warming in the region accelerates evaporation, thus raising the air's capacity to hold water. The increased water vapor capacity subsequently enhances the cloud cover over the region, which influences surface temperatures" Is this saying that increases in temperature cause increased cloud cover which in turn cause decrease in temperature? I am not an expert on the subject, but from a layman point of view this argument is flawed. Matushorvath (talk) 09:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global Warming 

message: If the cloud cover that is supposed to protect us from global warming is supposed to be good, how come it's causing a disease to become worse and killing all these amphibians in countries that used to be able to support them? GVnayR (talk) 04:17, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cloud cover 

message: The article states that this frog is immune to infection, and later that this frog was cured. Incompatible statements...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.45.61.51 (talk) 04:27, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archey's Frog 

message: Please see discussion at Talk:Batrachochytrium.   Animalparty (talk) 04:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge/incorporate sections from [[Batrachochytrium]] into this one. 

message: I reverted recent additions that were factually correct and important information, but that need substantial improvements in tone (neutrality, encyclopedic rather than essay-like), formatting (italics, wikilinks), and referencing. The reverted version can be found here. Again, the information is crucially important, but it is not yet ready for Wikipedia standards. Assistance would be welcome. --Animalparty-- (talk) 17:53, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I have revised and restored much of the above information, feeling more content is better than less, but there is still room for additional cleanup, revision, and expansions.--Animalparty-- (talk) 05:44, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent contributions needing improvement 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chytridiomycosis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090118233452/http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2006/8051/abstract.html to http://www.ehponline.org/docs/2006/8051/abstract.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:38, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello  This doesn't look redudant to me. There is no other mention of either hypha or zoospore morphology in the lede. In fact there is no other morphological information in the lede. Invasive Spices (talk) 9 February 2022 (UTC)
The sentence appeared to be an artifact from before the identification of the second species, hence the the lack of pluralization and second wiki link to fungus. A chytrid is a type of zoosporic non-hyphal fungus, so it's redundant to call them both. XeCyranium (talk) 01:29, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description