Talk:Demosaicing

message: In the first paragraph, I replaced color-filtered by color-filtered because the Bayer isn't the only color filter. I hope somebody will start Color filter Array if ther is enough demand.--Marc Lacoste 11:35, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color filter array 

message: I think Bayer filter#An illustrated explanation of color image reconstruction is more interesting here, Bayer Filters are less generic. --Marc Lacoste 23:41, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed merged 

message: I'm adding the following here, rather than the article, because I can't write it authoritatively. Hopefully someone else can re-word. The basic problem with digital cameras is that they are actually pretty hopeless! Consider viewing the output of an 8 Mpixel camera on an LCD monitor, enlarged to "1 pixel per pixel", i.e. 1 px of the image maps to 1 px on the display. The result ought to be perfect at this scale, but it is invariable poor, with either severe blurring, or very obvious colour fringing. Essentially, one ought to take the quoted Megapixel resolution of the camera and divide by 9 to obtain a resonable "truthful" resolution.  (Actually, 16 would really be necessary, but image-processing can help a bit. Nevertheless, image processing cannot recover the really hight frequency spatial data which has already been lost.)
:The authoritative fact is that you have been misled if you believe that a digital camera picture should appear "perfect" when displayed "1 pixel per pixel".  The article does explain why, I think, but your factors of 9 and 16 are just made up exaggerations of the problem. Just stick to the reality instead of the exaggeration. Dicklyon 07:11, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explains why digital cameras are less good than they ought to be 

message: Here's a way to explain colour fringing - it really needs a diagram. Imagine photographing a test object where the top-half is white, and the bottom-half is black. Then, the horizontal dividing line will lie over the mosaic in some way, dividing the sub-pixels. In the worst case, you will get an image with the top-half white, then a row of blue+green = turquoise, then a row of red + green = yellow, then the bottom half black. This is most unpleasant! It's even worse with purple fringes.
:It's a good thing that people who develop demosaicing algorithms don't just go with the first simple thing that occurs to them, huh?  Still, some problems are inevitable, since information is missing and needs to be "made up". Dicklyon 07:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simple explanation of colour fringing 

message: Some of the figures that were used in the article were deleted from commons, apparently for lacking a category.  Then the refs to them were removed from the article, leaving extra blank lines.  We can probably do fine with the images we have, with editing to patch it up. Dicklyon 21:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figures missing 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Demosaicing. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://sisl.seas.harvard.edu/files/pub/HirakawaWolfe2007.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:06, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Demosaicing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120422035609/http://scien.stanford.edu:80/pages/labsite/1999/psych221/projects/99/tingchen/main.htm to http://scien.stanford.edu/pages/labsite/1999/psych221/projects/99/tingchen/main.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060827234925/http://pixel.cs.vt.edu/courses/5814/p3b.html to http://pixel.cs.vt.edu/courses/5814/p3b.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720195627/http://sisl.seas.harvard.edu/files/pub/HirakawaWolfe2007.pdf to http://sisl.seas.harvard.edu/files/pub/HirakawaWolfe2007.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The sentence in the lead about the neat feature that cameras can store images as RAW files is pretty much irrelevant to the topic at hand and should be deleted. If your camera has a Bayer sensor, it can only take Bayered images, and that's not gonna change if you'll simply store your Bayered information inside a RAW file. It's like filling one tiny teaspoon of flour into a 1-gallon bag. Still, that sentence makes it sound as if the image would somehow not be Bayered in the first place if the camera only stores it as RAW. The only way to take a non-Bayered image is to either spend tens of thousands of Dollars at least on a DSLR with a non-Bayer sensor, or this weird new feature where a camera takes several photos by having the sensor jump around inside the camera and then automatically stitch the photos together into a single image. But none of that has anything to do with simply saving your Bayer information inside a RAW file. --79.242.203.134 (talk) 21:18, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  RAW format 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Demosaicing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091229063407/http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home5/CHAN0069/JEI013003.pdf to http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home5/CHAN0069/JEI013003.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091229063407/http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home5/CHAN0069/JEI013003.pdf to http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home5/CHAN0069/JEI013003.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://scien.stanford.edu/pages/labsite/1999/psych221/projects/99/tingchen/main.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100617081150/http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~huangyz/cvpr08_Huang.pdf to http://pages.cs.wisc.edu/~huangyz/cvpr08_Huang.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091229063407/http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home5/CHAN0069/JEI013003.pdf to http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home5/CHAN0069/JEI013003.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100108045355/http://www.csee.wvu.edu/~xinl/papers/demosaicing_survey.pdf to http://www.csee.wvu.edu/~xinl/papers/demosaicing_survey.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081030224717/http://www.ece.gatech.edu/research/labs/MCCL/pubs/dwnlds/p5.pdf to http://www.ece.gatech.edu/research/labs/MCCL/pubs/dwnlds/p5.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303221338/http://dcmc.ee.ncku.edu.tw/~hwt94d/ to http://dcmc.ee.ncku.edu.tw/~hwt94d/
*Added  tag to http://www.ceremade.dauphine.fr/~sira/Demosaicking.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:05, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified