Talk:Pastoral pipes

message: I think it's a bit absurd to have two different articles entitled Pastoral Pipes and Pastoral pipes (note capitalization!). I'm proposing merging them, but I'm not doing it right away in case anyone would like to suggest a different name for one article or the other and keep them separate. --Craig Stuntz 13:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite agree - I reckon here is the better place as there is no particuar reason for the capitilisation. Calum 17:52, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Restoration of former article by unsigned edit and restoration of cited sources removed by unsigned editor. The sources for the removal of the footjoint are cited, credible and come from a source in Cambridge university so they stay. Celtic Harper (talk) 23:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsigned Edit

message: There is no real evidence that the Pastoral form of the instrument, i.e. the "New Bagpipe", was referred to as the Union Pipes.  There is however good evidence that the name "Union Bagpipes" was applied to the foot-joint-less instrument prior to 1800.  The name "uilleann" has not been documented prior to Grattan Flood's (now-discredited) assertion (c1903) that uilleann was the previous name of the instrument.
The consensus among scholars of the latter instrument is that "Union Pipes" and "Irish Pipes" were the names in circulation prior to Flood.
It is indeed thought, nowadays (though dissenting views exist) that the Pastoral instrument evolved into the "Union" instrument, which underwent further change during the late 19th and early 20th centuries; however the name change to "uilleann" seems to be only that - a name change - thus "Union" and "Uilleann" pipes are the same.  There is a convention to refer to pre-20th-century union/uilleann instruments by the former name ("union" pipes) and "modern" instruments by the latter, but this is merely a convention.
Thus photos of and references to "Union Pipes" should be moved to the Uilleann Pipes Wikipedia article, and reference to their presumed origin in the Pastoral Pipes should be retained in this article.  The current arrangement wrongly implies that pastoral and union pipes are the same instrument (e.g. "other names" in the RHS box), and uilleann pipes are something different..  A similar, but lesser, problem exists on the uilleann pipes page where the pastoral pipes are referred to as an "early form of the uilleann pipes".
I should point out that these origins are, while oft-repeated, still hypothetical and speculative - I have never encountered a contemporary account of removal of the foot-joint.  Unfortunately much of the published material on these instruments is based on thin scholarship and a number of the views in this article are controversial - a reader of the article in its current form would not get any indication of this.
best regards,
Bill Haneman
86.42.95.228 (talk) 00:49, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Union pipe material belongs with Uilleann Pipes article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Pastoral pipes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928073634/http://www.bemccandless.net/pdfs/PastoralUnion_McCandless.pdf to http://www.bemccandless.net/pdfs/PastoralUnion_McCandless.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:41, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Pastoral pipes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928073634/http://www.bemccandless.net/pdfs/PastoralUnion_McCandless.pdf to http://www.bemccandless.net/pdfs/PastoralUnion_McCandless.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Pastoral pipes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206034027/http://www.bagpipeworld.co.uk/British%20Isles/Union.htm to http://www.bagpipeworld.co.uk/British%20Isles/Union.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070527162555/http://www.music.ed.ac.uk/euchmi/ubl/ublg.html to http://www.music.ed.ac.uk/euchmi/ubl/ublg.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110527065817/http://www.rsai.ie/index.cfm?action=obj.display&obj_id=84 to http://www.rsai.ie/index.cfm?action=obj.display&obj_id=84
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206034027/http://www.bagpipeworld.co.uk/British%20Isles/Union.htm to http://www.bagpipeworld.co.uk/British%20Isles/Union.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206212242/http://www.bagpipeworld.co.uk/British%20Isles/Pastoral.htm to http://www.bagpipeworld.co.uk/British%20Isles/Pastoral.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060530204343/http://www.greylarsen.com/store/samples/essguide_chap1-2.pdf to http://www.greylarsen.com/store/samples/essguide_chap1-2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified