lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Was mir behagt, ist nur die muntre Jagd, BWV 208

message: There really must be a public domain version of this in Bach's arrangement performed by a good ensemble and singers?  The present file is misleading as it completely reinterprets the intrumentation at the whim of the arranger (without telling unsuspecting listener this fact).  --Jubilee♫clipman 01:05, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sheep may safely graze

message: See . Awaiting appreciation of that proposal. --Francis Schonken (talk) 06:45, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead and infobox in case of merge

message: In the melee of the attempts to merge Was mir behagt, ist nur die muntre Jagd, BWV 208a into this one against current consensus, we ended up with two circular redirects in this article: BWV 208.3  had redirected back to this one . Ditto BWV 208.2 . Both of them should actually redirect to Was mir behagt, ist nur die muntre Jagd, BWV 208a. I've fixed them  ,  But perhaps those more familiar with these articles should double-check that this is now OK. Voceditenore (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This is ok, Voce, thank you. I wonder how much work we will have to do, going over the quick and undiscussed introduction of the new (and yes a bit more systematic) BWV numbers pretending the ones we had before (beginning in 1850) were "former" of "previous". No, they are still valid, and dont blong in brackets. All Bach Digital sources have them on the same level. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:58, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double Redirects
Talk:Wo soll ich fliehen hin, BWV 5

message: I've just listened to "Ergieße dich reichlich, du göttliche Quelle" and I can't help thinking that I've heard a pop song or TV theme tune very similar. I know this isn't very on topic, trivia at most, but does anyone think the same? ML5 (talk) 13:10, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "Ergieße dich reichlich, du göttliche Quelle" similar to a pop song?
Talk:Wär Gott nicht mit uns diese Zeit, BWV 14

message: * Taking this step by step: can we re-introduce the Neuendorf source (per #3 above)? And if not, why not? --Francis Schonken (talk) 07:07, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Added, please use it.--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:13, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Step by step
Talk:Connotations (Copland)

message: I've perused the article as requested, and corrected a few typos. A few remaining queries about words:
*shrifing – not a word I know, but if it is a typo I can't think what it ought to be
*frentic – either frantic or frenetic, I assume, but not knowing which of the two it should be I have left it alone
* absorbtion – as it is in a quote I didn't like to amend it; perhaps Copland spelled it thus.
*"The Fall Hamlet" – seems curiously bilingual, with an English definite article and a German noun.
It's a fine article, and I found it very instructive as well as enjoyable. Tim riley (talk) 12:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of text 

message: The article refers to a correspondence between Copland and "composer" Cesar Chavez, with a link to the article on the latter.  However, on the surface this seems unlikely.  More likely he wrote to Carlos Chavez, who was actually a composer with whom Copland was acquainted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.54.49 (talk) 12:05, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chavez
Talk:Lincoln Portrait

message: - within article are footnote indicators...all linked to external sites.  where are normal source-citation footnotes at bottom of article wherein sources are linked?  
- and shouldn't the last entry (tom hanks) mention that the lincoln memorial event was part of the obama/biden inaugural weekend?
--98.116.115.220 (talk) 03:12, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  footnotes and comment on recent entry 

message: Coretta Scott King narrated it twice, once with Copland himself conducting. I'd add it myself but I cannot nail down the dates.  The Sanity Inspector (talk) 03:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Narrators suggested addition
Talk:Symphony No. 3 (Copland)

message: Aaron Copeland's Symphony No.3 was performed on grand opening night, January 26, 2011, by the New World Symphony at New World Center in Miami.  The New World Center is the design of Architect Frank Gehry.  The conductor was Michael Tilson Thomas.  The New World Symphony is America's orchestral academy where less than 3 per cent of of the student applicants are given three year fellowships.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rikwrybac (talk • contribs) 02:11, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

message: There are words and phrases sprinkled through this article that don't seem neutral or verifiable, such as "we are quickly snapped out of the reverie", "dashing, boisterous", "glory", "dazzling", "The overall tone of the work is one of heroism and dignity, and it leaves an appropriately stirring impression".  Much of it reads more like a musical review (which is nice) than an encyclopedia entry (which it's supposed to be). Nasch (talk) 20:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral? 

message: Is the discography section intended to be exhaustive?  If so, there is a new superaudio recording released 10-02-2015 on Pentatone with Carlos Kalmar and the Oregon Symphony  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.63.232.6 (talk) 22:55, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography
Talk:German auxiliary cruiser Michel

message: It looks like someone started this page but didn’t finish
I don’t know how much more detail is necessary for an encyclopaedia article; the link given and the books cited for reference are good for a blow by blow account for any who wish that.Xyl 54 08:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First Raider Voyage

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 12:26, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Could someone clarify the chronology and meaning of the following passage:
:Michel sailed on 20 March 1942 under the command of FK (later KzS) Helmuth von Ruckteschell ...
:Michel grounded at the attempt to run through the Channel and had to return but managed to reach the Atlantic on 20 March after a second try. Thereby on 14/15 March the cruiser and the escorts were repeatedly attacked by British forces, without success.
Drutt (talk) 09:22, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: I’ve reworded this </br>
"Some sources incorrectly credit the Michel with the sinking of the freighter Reynolds on November 2 1942. This 5,113-ton British ship was in fact sunk on October 31 1942 - by the U-504 (Korvettenkapitän Fritz Poske)" </br>
The sources given here (Muggenthaler, Schmalenbach) which say Reynolds was sunk by Michel are reliable, so if some other source says different, it should (at best) be recorded in a  “some say.. but others say�? format; there’s no “incorrectly�? or “in fact�? about it. Xyl 54 (talk) 01:58, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sinking of ''Reynolds''
Talk:Schließe mir die Augen beide

message: Alternate translation
Close both my eyes
with those dear hands of yours,
as everything I suffer
comes to rest beneath your hand.
And as pain wave upon wave
gently goes to sleep,
as the last beat stirs,
you fill my whole heart.2003:C9:7BCA:E901:7D23:4665:C15A:F380 (talk) 14:38, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The poem quoted is "Schließe mir der Augen beide", which is probably what Storm wrote, and what would eeven in today's orthography be correct. "Schliesse" looks wrong. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:13, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm very certain that the poem's title is indeed "Schließe mir die Augen beide", and Universal's score of Berg's 1900 version at IMSLP shows that too. The 1925 doesn't show that because there's a syllable separator on "schlies – se". This article ought to be moved accordingly to Schließe mir die Augen beide. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:46, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Mysterium (Scriabin)

message: The term "Fortean aggregate" appears only in this article, is not explained anywhere on Wikipedia, and a Google search only yields results from copies of the same text or paragraph. It is also not self-explanatory and sounds bogus to me. Even if it isn't, the reference is useless unless explained/wikilinked/sourced.
178.115.251.178 (talk) 21:24, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fortean aggregate"? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jmares3218 (talk) 03:41, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 19th Century Concert Life
Talk:Prometheus: The Poem of Fire

message: Just a note to say that I renamed this page from "Prometheus: Poem of Fire" to "Prometheus: The Poem of Fire" - my reason being that the new title is a more usual title for the piece than the old one.  Hope no-one objects. M.J.E. 04:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dunno if you're still watching this...but anyway. Doing a bit of net research, it really seems to be either or. Arkivmusic.com and Chandos.net both use it without the 'the', Classicstoday.com consistently uses simply "Prometheus", except once where they use 'The'. My Naxos CD uses 'The' as does the webpage on said CD. Bis (both CD and webpage) seem to use the odd construction "Prometheus (The Poem of Fire)". I guess 'The' is a bit more prominent, but there's no standard. I believe Russian doesn't have a definite article, which is probably why variations exist. ♫ Melodia Chaconne ♫ (talk) 13:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renamed page. 
Talk:Protocol converter

message: This is a rather dubious article. gives no context.--Boscobiscotti 05:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Symphony No. 2 (Scriabin)

message: "When Vassily Safonoff, conductor of the New York Philharmonic from 1903 to 1919..."
Really? Safonoff died in 1918. And I thought that the ill-fated Josef Stransky was a conductor with NYP for part of those years.Pinikadia 16:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates for Safonoff's NYP Tenure
Talk:The Poem of Ecstasy

message: Ummm... who says it's a symphony??  -- megA (talk) 22:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's mentioned as an example on the page about Symphonic Poems, which I think is correct. Scriabin wrote 3 pieces he called "Symphony" (the last one with the title "The Divine Poem"), as well as "The Poem of Extasy" and "Prometheus", which I think are classified as "symphonic poems". -- megA (talk) 20:43, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'll be bold. -- megA (talk) 09:11, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Symphony? 

message: Whilst it is well documented that Messiaen did indeed have synaesthesia, there is no evidence Scriabin did too. It is even considered doubtful; for the artificial coloration between Newton's Optics and his own musical colourings shed grave doubts indeed. Besides- somebody who likes to think of notes as corresponding to colours does not need a genetic condition to do so, and to make such an assumption is indeed rather dangerous.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:1257:3400:CC7:B5D3:3100:E8B8 (talk) 23:18, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synaesthesia
Talk:Lyric Symphony

message: Universal Edition, the work's publishers have an online ad which describes this work as leaning more towards the symphonic than Mahler's Das Lied von der Erde, on which they believe it to have been based.  Zemlinsky wrote at least two acknowledged and performed symphonies in the 1890s.  He also taught Alma Schindler, who became Mahler's wife. Both works use translations of Oriental poetry as texts, though from very different societies and centuries.  In what way does Zemlinsky enable us to hear this "Symphony" symphonically?Delahays (talk) 14:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:China International Aviation & Aerospace Exhibition

message: very big aerospatial and aviation exhit,but lack the english references.Hope someone to find.--Ksyrie 05:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Serenade for Strings (Dvořák)

message: I added some supplementary material to the Composition and Premiere section and to the Form section. I also fixed the capitalization of some of the titles which were previously improper. Information in the Scherzo/Vivace section and the Finale section was re-worded to be more analytically based. I also added a Quotes & Interpretation section, and a Notes section. Finally, I added two links to the External Links section. I hope this is all okay. If anyone wants to take on a challenge, I recommend finding information about the grant Dvorak won around this time and find out how it was related to this piece.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pstrongw (talk • contribs) 06:05, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: I own a recording of this on CD, where the second movement is simply listed as a Menuetto: Allegro con moto - Trio. The sleeve notes refer to it as "The Minuet (actually far more a waltz in feeling)...". Does anyone know where the Tempo di Valse comes from and which is more correct?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.177.168.226 (talk) 11:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tempo di Valse
Talk:Songs My Mother Taught Me (Dvořák)

message: I suggest to include the audio at right.Anythingyouwant (talk) 17:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More music 

message: Rather than a set of singable lyrics (not to mention lyrics in German -- I'm sure we could get them perfectly well at German Wikipedia!), why not include a literal translation from the original Czech?
Nuttyskin (talk) 21:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics
Talk:Prototype Fast Reactor

message: The Prototype Fast Reactor at Dounreay is most often called just PFR, but there's another article at this title. But both Prototype Fast Reactor and PFR are names of this specific reactor, as distinct from prototype fast reactor (uncapitalised) which could mean any FBR prototype I guess. Andrewa 05:25, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: redir target
Talk:The Water Goblin

message: This articles says that Dvorák composed six symphonic poems. But six? Not five? 1. The Water Goblin. 2. The Noon Witch. 3. The Golden Spinning Wheel. 4. The Wild Dove. 5. A Hero's Song. ???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.47.8.65 (talk) 16:39, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Six symphonic poems?
Talk:Silent Woods (Dvořák)

message: I’d very much like to see this under the title Silent Woods, or Silent Woods (Dvořák).  That’s what it’s known as in the anglosphere, and this is English WP.  
It’s shown under its Czech and English titles, but not Waldesruhe, at both:
* List of compositions by Antonín Dvořák and 
* List of compositions by Antonín Dvořák by Burghauser number.  
It’s under Silent Woods only at Cello concerto and Hanuš Wihan (its dedicatee and first performer).  
This article even starts out with the words "Silent Woods". 
It does get Waldesruhe (Silent Woods) at List of compositions for cello and orchestra.  And it does get Waldesruhe alone at List of compositions for piano duo.  
So, if the English title is good enough for the more important places where it’s mentioned, that seems to suggest the German title it had on original publication is not well known and effectively unimportant.  We can refer to "Waldesruhe" in the text (as we already do), and easily set up a redirect from Waldesruhe.  --  JackofOz (talk) 18:55, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Further (and much later), the disambiguator "(Dvořák)" seems unnecessary. The article should be moved to Silent Woods, which has 2 incoming links. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:13, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Piano Concerto (Khachaturian)

message: I noticed two independent sources that claim the actual premiere of this piece was on July 5, 1937 in Leningrad: http://www.classical-composers.org/comp/khachatu as well as the annotations edited by grammy-winning Rory Guy on the LP version of Leonard Pennario and Felix Slatkin's EMI recording with the Concert Arts Orchestra.
However, this article claims the premiere was July 12, 1937 in Moscow, and cites it source: http://home.wanadoo.nl/ovar/kachcata.htm . I as well found another source that agrees with this online: http://www.khachaturian.am/eng/works/koncert.htm
I checked scholarly databases (Grove Music and JSTOR) and they don't seem to have an opinion.
Methegreat (talk) 01:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Premiere was possibly earlier 

message: According to Boosey & Hawkes' miniature score edition (copyright of 1946) the first movement has just "Allegro maestoso", not "Allegro ma non troppo e maestoso" as written in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.1.31.206 (talk) 07:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tempo of first movement 
Talk:Twelve concerti grossi, Op. 6 (Corelli)

message: Nitpick: it would have been good if the recent page move had observed WP:OPUS and used a space between "Op." and "6". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:10, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Page name

message: Continuo is not mentioned. If it is not in the score, it might be mentioned as usually inserted in practice.--Wetman (talk) 19:57, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuo
Talk:Die glückliche Hand

message: When I first heard this music, around seventy years ago, I remember the broadcast introduction taking great care to explain exactly what the German expression "Gluckliche Hand" actually meant.  Nothing like the "Hand of Fate" was even hinted at, and even the various online instant translationa available don't use those words - or ideas - either.  Where on earth does this rendering come from?   If I can make sense of what actually appears to be the meaning it seems to be this - the "Gluckliche Hand" is innate natural ability - in art, in love or anything you set your mind, or hand, to.   Whether or not you have it is a matter of chance and luck. You can't learn it- it's not a trick or an acquirable skill.   Schoenberg's "Mann" has it all right, but not in what matters most to him.  The title therefore is ironic and the English equivalent proposed here doesn't show "eine gluckliche Hand" at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delahays (talk • contribs) 17:32, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Witwatersrand Basin

message: Since this is an unashamedly geological subject, I believe more detail about the basin's geology and its origins need to be spelled out in some detail. I have just rewritten the the geology of the Witwatersrand, and its geological origin, much of which would be appropriate here. I will edit what I have written in the Witwatersrand article, and copy it into here. There will be a fair degree of duplication, but if that is acknowledged in both articles, it is an acceptable Wikipedia practice. If I could contact the original author of this article I would have liked to discuss it with that author. 
If no one responds to these comments, I will make the changes; which can always be undone if they prove to be unacceptable, or inappropriate, or improvable.Oggmus (talk) 14:09, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Geology and Geological History of the Witwatersrand Basin needed

message: As indicated above I have re-written the article to include much needed information about the structure of the basin, its geological origins etc. I have moved the table of Gold Earning up to 1910 to the History section of the Witwatersrand article, from which I copied and pasted a fair amount text (suitably edited) into this article. So there is a considerable degree of overlap between these two articles, but hopefully not to the degree that anyone would get bored reading the two (I hope!) The overlap is inevitable as the geology and geological history of the part (Witwatersrand) is the same as that of the whole (the Witwatersrand Basin).
If this revision was premature, or ill-conceived, or inaccurate, then it is easy to revert to the previous version, or introduce a new set of revisions.Oggmus (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Article re-written

message: There seems to be considerable overlap between the articles. It's hard to see why there is a need for a copy-paste and two nearly identical articles.13:22, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger with Witwatersrand
Talk:Piano Concerto (Schoenberg)

message: 16th? Schoenberg.at gives 6th. Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:29, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no contradicting source offered, so I changed it. Thanks for calling attention to this mistake.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 21:42, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Premiere

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.ca/books?id=PbEkCwAAQBAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&pg=PA198. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:28 Days Later: The Soundtrack Album

message: The article seems to refer to two separate songs.  "In the House - In a Heartbeat" is an instrumental track from 28 Days Later, while the guitar tablature and "28 Days Later theme" refer to a song by Godspeed You! Black Emperor called "East Hastings".
71.48.7.165 08:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments transferred from [[In the House - In a Heartbeat]]

message: I think that Gounod's "ave maria" is played in the movie, but I'm not sure about it...Could someone verify this, since I don't possess the DVD i can't verify it myself ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.182.157.192 (talk) 15:07, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gounod's Ave Maria 

message: Would it be worth mentioning that 'in the house-in a heartbeat' is used as backing music for a lot of tv (in the uk at least)? Abergabe (talk) 17:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This would lead to one of the dreaded "In popular culture" sections. In fact, a whole load of this stuff was removed a while back, because it was unsourced cruft and added little to the article. Here is what was axed.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 18:58, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hehe, no worries :) i was just thinking a generalised note rather than a list of specific examples but your right, probably a bad move :P Abergabe (talk) 19:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Arguably the best place where "In the House - In a Heartbeat" appears other than this film is the Uruguayan short Ataque de Pánico!. This caused a sensation on YouTube in late 2009, and it makes excellent use of the whole piece. It has also been used in umpteen TV trailers etc, but this is not really notable enough for a Wikipedia article.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 20:03, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Use in TV

message: I suggest to reorder this part as a verbatim list of the soundtrack and a separate Used as section.
Theking2 (talk) 17:40, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorder