Talk:Technical diving

message: I understand it as diving with a change of breathing gas (excluding O2 during deco), but cannot quickly find a reference to support this. Anyone agree? Finavon 07:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: Dive College Mexico is a close copy of this article, but which way? I suspect it was lifted from wiki, without acknowledgement and cannot be cited as a source. Unless this can be confirmed, then presumably the wiki article is infringing the stated copyright and should be removed. Finavon 22:27, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy 

message: After a fairly vigorous discussion on a message board, I decided to put in some of the areas of disagreement about the definition and borders of what constitutes "technical diving".  I know this had edit dispute written all over it, but I have tried to keep in neutrel and cite sources. --Legis (talk - contribs) 22:10, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Parameters

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Technical diving. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090829200712/http://www.bluebeyond.com.au:80/modx/bluebeyond-dive-deep-air-is-stupidity.html to http://www.bluebeyond.com.au/modx/bluebeyond-dive-deep-air-is-stupidity.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Our present text states , sourced to Simon Mitchell's 2004 paper on Technical Diving. However Mitchell does not suggest that depths greater than 55 metres expose the air diver to a "high" risk of acute oxygen toxicity. The nearest he comes to that is the following on page 59: 
Considering that it is on the same page as the NOAA oxygen exposure tables, which indicate a limit of 45 minutes for a single exposure to 1.6 bar PO2, there can be little doubt that Mitchell considers that "much above" 1.6 bar PO2 is where the risk starts to rise rapidly. This is in accord with Professor Donald's experiments during WWII which led to a limit of 2.0 bar PO2 being recommended for many years post-war until the current more conservative limits were introduced comparatively recently. As an oxygen partial pressure of 1.6 bar occurs at 66 metres when breathing air, I don't think we can justify the present text in our article. I would suggest that "A diver breathing normal air (with 21% oxygen) will be exposed to increasing risk of central nervous system oxygen toxicity at depths greater than about ". From a statistical point of view, there are just too few incidents of CNS OxTox reliably attributable to PO2 of 1.6 or below for anyone to suggest that there is a "high risk" at such partial pressures. --RexxS (talk) 17:51, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite agree. Will change to comply. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 19:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 19:10, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixtures to reduce oxygen toxicity 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Technical diving. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090827054512/http://www.liquidtravel.org:80/transitioning-to-technical-diving.html to http://www.liquidtravel.org/transitioning-to-technical-diving.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited. Any format of inline citation is acceptable: the use of <ref> tags and citation templates such as  is optional.Some more references needed Still need a few, but I'm going to call this good enough 
The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. It contains a large proportion of the material necessary for , although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing.Looks OK 
The article has a defined structure. Content should be organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind.Looks OK 
The article is reasonably well-written. The prose contains no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly, but it does not need to be "brilliant". The Manual of Style does not need to be followed rigorously.Looks OK 
The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required. Diagrams and an infobox etc. should be included where they are relevant and useful to the content.Looks OK 
More citations needed. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 16:03, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Good enough for B-class • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 15:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-Class review 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Technical diving. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.padi.com/english/common/courses/rec/continue/deepdiver.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160531063908/http://www.alertdiver.com/nitrox to http://www.alertdiver.com/nitrox
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090221012251/http://diversalertnetwork.org/medical/articles/article.asp?articleid=29 to http://www.diversalertnetwork.org/medical/articles/article.asp?articleid=29
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified