Talk:Walt Disney Classics

message: The 1989 photos of Dumbo and The Sword in the Stone are in the 1990 section. TobytheTramEngine 16:34, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darn it! 

message: Someone replaced the Bambi image with an original Pinocchio poster image! TobytheTramEngine 05:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oh no! 

message: Since most photos keep getting deleted, can I remove all of them? TobytheTramEngine 17:22, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Covers 

message: I reverted it because I felt it's not constructive. I tried to warn the IP but I was mixed up because of the templates' names. Or is it shall I carefully read them? TobytheTramEngine 18:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney Previews 

message: :Image:Fantasiafront.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:41, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Fantasiafront.jpg

message: :Image:PeterPan1990cover.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:PeterPan1990cover.PNG

message: I can't undo the edit about phony releases to Dumbo, The Sword in the Stone and Alice in Wonderland because I'm afraid a vandal will undo it. TobytheTramEngine (talk) 15:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "nothing ever happens Wednesday." FYI, the current norm of Tuesday video and CD releases didn't begin until the mid-late 90s. Prior to that, Wednesday was the industry standard, which was set early in the mid-1990s. And before that, it was anybody's game. I've been in the video biz since 1986; back then, and until the Wednesday shift, a week could see five major video releases, one on every day of the week.PacificBoy 02:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry 

message: No more phony releases like Dumbo released on September 20, 1991, The Sword in the Stone released on December 24, 1991 and Alice in Wonderland released on July 19, 1991, as I would call them The Phony King of England. TobytheTramEngine 21:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your behavior is unacceptable. That is not the conduct of a Wikipedian. TobytheTramEngine 04:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop! 

message: I have a feeling that all of the discussions should be moved to a fourth archive of this article. How do I do it? TobytheTramEngine 18:41, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Help:Archiving a talk page. I created and moved some older discussions to archive 4 Garion96 (talk) 22:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archive 4 

message: Sorry if I have to say this, but the images really did fail NFCC. TobytheTramEngine (talk) 21:28, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They really do. This is just decorative use. Garion96 (talk) 22:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see. Mind if I remove them for that reason? I now realized that fair use images can't be used just to decorate an article. TobytheTramEngine (talk) 05:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do. Garion96 (talk) 07:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just did. If anyone else reverts the edit, I'll let you know. TobytheTramEngine (talk) 22:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: I thought about changing the date for the 1991 VHS of "Dumbo to October 22, 1991 because according to the article about 1991, this date is Tuesday and everything always happens on Tuesday, and plus, it's one day before the film's 50th anniversary, as defined on the article about Dumbo. Same thing for "Alice in Wonderland", I'm listing that as July 23, 1991 because according to that article, it is Tuesday and six days before the film's 40th anniversary, as defined on the article about Alice in Wonderland 18:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, no. Sorry, definitely not. TobytheTramEngine (talk) 00:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry, do not add it, even if it is reverted. Please go here. TobytheTramEngine (talk) 05:19, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Still, no. TobytheTramEngine (talk) 21:13, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Still, no. Also, I don't think Answers.com is a reliable source. TobytheTramEngine (talk) 22:06, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Answers.com is a mirror of Wikipedia; information there was here first. Master of Puppets Care to share? 02:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops! TobytheTramEngine (talk) 14:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Your edit has been reverted. Please go here. TobytheTramEngine (talk) 05:06, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry, permanently no. TobytheTramEngine (talk) 01:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

text: No personal attacks like that, ok? Please be civil. Discuss it with other editors. Master of Puppets Care to share? 02:07, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IMITATING SOMEONE WHO HAS BEEN WORKING IN THE VIDEO INDUSTRY FOR THE LAST 23 YEARS: Are you aware that from the late 1980s until about 1996-7, EVERYTHING WAS RELEASED ON A 'WEDNESDAY'? The industry-wide shift to Tuesday release dates didn't happen until the mid-1990s. And pinpointing exact dates based on days of the week is virtually impossible prior to about 1991, because there was no industry standard until then. Trust me, I've been doing this for damn near a quarter century, and I was on the scene when much of this went down.PacificBoy 02:07, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey! 

message: This is not a Black Diamond title, it was part of the Walt Disney Masterpiece Collection line.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.198.171 (talk) 02:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about ''The Lion King'' (1994)? 

message: Hello! I will be working on this article over the next few weeks as part of a Technical Editing class at Texas A&M University. I wanted to share what I am looking at working on and introducing myself before making any major edits.
===Things to consider===
* Needs to be copy edited
* The table of contents looks overwhelming
* "Prehistory" title could be changed
* The organization of the sub-subcategories under "North American release history" can have a different format to differentiate it from the timeline sub titles
* Some sections need a more informative title
* Has tags at the top of page
===Plans===
* copy edit
* edit titles 
* reformat sub-subcategories
* reorganize table of contents
Please respond if you feel that there is anything else I should consider before beginning. Thank you!
==Adding a table==
Hello everyone! I think it would be beneficial to add a table of all the Walt Disney Classics films and their release dates. There will also be a section for "notes" for additional information. I think this will improve the page in order to consolidate a lot of information and streamlining the look of the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skmatth (talk • contribs) 19:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Plans for Improvement

message: Hello everyone! I think it would be beneficial to add a table of all the Walt Disney Classics films and their release dates. There will also be a section for "notes" for additional information. I think this will improve the page in order to consolidate a lot of information and streamlining the look of the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skmatth (talk • contribs) 19:57, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding a table

message: Not all films released in this collection made it into the Walt Disney Masterpiece Collection. The seven exceptions are Pinocchio, The Rescuers Down Under, Fantasia, The Great Mouse Detective, Beauty and the Beast, Aladdin, and the Fox and the Hound.
--Evope (talk) 07:26, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walt Disney Masterpiece Collection 

message: Should we add that Fantasia is the only package film in the Walt Disney Classics lineup?
--Evope (talk) 21:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  package film 

message: The success of old Walt Disney animated films Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, Pinocchio, Fantasia, Bambi, Cinderella, Alice in Wonderland, Peter Pan, Lady and the Tramp, Sleeping Beauty, 101 Dalmatians, The Sword in the Stone, The Jungle Book, The Aristocats, Robin Hood and The Rescuers were re-released in theatres in the 1980s, along with new Walt Disney animated films The Fox and the Hound, The Black Cauldron, The Great Mouse Detective, Oliver & Company and The Little Mermaid were released in theatres in the 1980s, Hercules was never released in theatres in 1989. Dumbo, The Three Caballeros, Fun and Fancy Free and The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh were released on VHS in 1981 (For Sale Only, Not Intended for Rental), because Saludos Amigos, Make Mine Music, Melody Time, The Adventures of Ichabod & Mr. Toad and The Aristocats were never released on VHS in 1981.
Hercules came out in theatres in 1997, and it came out on VHS and Laserdisc in 1998 as part of the Walt Disney Masterpiece Collection line from 1994-1999. Hercules is just look like Fantasia, The Three Caballeros, Saludos Amigos, Make Mine Music, Melody Time, Fun and Fancy Free, The Adventures of Ichabod & Mr. Toad and The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh.
The last traditional cel animated film produced by Walt Disney Feature Animation to be first theatrical release in the 1980s was The Little Mermaid and Fantasia was first released on VHS and Laserdisc in late 1991 as part of the Walt Disney Classics line from 1984-1994, because The Three Caballeros, Saludos Amigos, Make Mine Music, Melody Time, Fun and Fancy Free, The Adventures of Ichabod & Mr. Toad and The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh were never made in the Walt Disney Classics line.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.147.18.244 (talk) 16:04, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Hercules'' (1989 Walt Disney Feature Animation traditional cel animated film) 

message: The table here is a victim to vandalism. The dates are clearly wrong. Would someone please correct them? 2600:1702:2C60:A60:7841:D7B3:1211:E326 (talk) 20:45, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Potentially 7,000,000 copies of The Rescuers were sold. My problem is that the only readable source for me is a blog, the other is from Newspaperarchive.com which requires you to sign in. The newspaper im looking for is here: . - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 14:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Rescuers