Talk:History of the Turkish people

message: == It is wrong ==
7th century BC is a wrong date for the first appereance of the Turkish tribes. At least 40 centuries of Turkish history is known today(actually ancestors of the first Turkish tribes possibly lived 10,000 years before). With respect, Deliogul 10:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, it is 2nd century BC that Turkish people appear as a part of Hun coalition under Teoman. But Turkic people has an older history. Ati7 10:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, the last post by 58.164.101.210 is loaded with nonsense, in my opinion. I think 82.83.158.97 has made some good points.DaMatriX (talk) 16:26, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  82.83.158.97, you are partially wrong. The Turkic people who were ancestor of Turkish people are probably like Turkmens and not like, for example, Mongols. Kavas (talk) 22:18, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

text: How could this even happen? Turkish people have not only settled around Turkey in history. They have migrated. So the history of the Turkish people should not only be covered by history of Turkey. It has a wider meaning, don't you think so? --Stultiwikiatext me 22:55, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: 7th century BC is a wrong date for the first appereance of the Turkish tribes. At least 40 centuries of Turkish history is known today(actually ancestors of the first Turkish tribes possibly lived 10,000 years before). With respect, Deliogul 10:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, it is 2nd century BC that Turkish people appear as a part of Hun coalition under Teoman. But Turkic people has an older history. Ati7 10:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, the last post by 58.164.101.210 is loaded with nonsense, in my opinion. I think 82.83.158.97 has made some good points.DaMatriX (talk) 16:26, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  82.83.158.97, you are partially wrong. The Turkic people who were ancestor of Turkish people are probably like Turkmens and not like, for example, Mongols. Kavas (talk) 22:18, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is wrong 

message: Tonyukuk was not a khan. He was a yabgu of Bilge. (I didn't change it) Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:33, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tonyukuk 

message: Are there political intentions to have a dispute about the word TURKISH 
but no dispute about whats written about the Armenian Genocide ???
88.246.134.75 (talk) 22:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute of the name Turkish 

message: I suggest we should redirect History of the Turkish people to History of Turkey, actually they have the same meaning. Only materials that cannot be moved from this page to History of Turkey are this long DNA section and origin of Turkish people section. But, most of this material can be moved to Turkish people article. Kavas (talk) 22:20, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: How could this even happen? Turkish people have not only settled around Turkey in history. They have migrated. So the history of the Turkish people should not only be covered by history of Turkey. It has a wider meaning, don't you think so? --Stultiwikiatext me 22:55, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect the page