lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Harry Carey (actor)

message: Is it appropriate to have "American lawyer" as a category?  It's says Harry was the son of a lawyer; was he actually an attorney himself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kyle UNC Law (talk • contribs) 21:58, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, i have remove it. Petrusbarbygere 03:44, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawyer 

message: For the record, I would have objected to the renaming of the father's article as Harry Carey (actor), since both father and son were actors and the son acted in many films without using the Jr. appellation.  However, I happened to miss the brief window for discussion, presumably because this disambiguation page is not on my watchlist.  Bummer.Monkeyzpop (talk) 01:15, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be that his son was often in the credits without Jr. appendix, but all web documents used in his article, including his own website, the website of his production company, and his IMDb entry, call him "Harry Carey Jr.". I'm not an expert in this area, but it seemed logical to me that the majority would refer to him as Jr. to distinguish him from his father, another well known actor. In hindsight, I could have posted a short notice of my proposal at WP:BIOG or WP:FILMS. I did post one at Talk:B movie#Harry_Carey, but no one seemed to care, so I went ahead and moved the page anyway. Cheers, theFace 07:07, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title changed 

message: Slightly off-topic here but, is this the actor (Harry Carey) that Will Ferrel does a parody of on SNL? Or is it his son? Or someone else entirely? The reason I am asking IS related to knowledge though; Whenever I see a parody of something on a show, such as SNL, or Family Guy, etc, I want to know about the original (in this case, Harry Carey).
Maximus23623 (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That was not Harry Carey, but Harry Caray, a baseball commentator and interviewer. Cheers, theFace 18:26, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, thank you =) Maximus23623 (talk) 00:33, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a question... 

message: His role in mr. Smith is actually the vice president as president of the senate. 2600:1014:B1E2:74CA:BCCA:2225:6368:690D (talk) 05:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Smith.
Talk:Hungerford Bridge and Golden Jubilee Bridges

message: Why is it named the 'Hungerford' Bridge??
The first bridge at this location was a suspension bridge, designed by IK Brunel. At the north end it landed on the site of Hungerford market, and so the bridge was called Hungerford bridge. The market was named after the Earl of Hungerford, who owned the land.
:I had always thought that it was called Hungerford Bridge because the chains used in the original pedestrian suspension bridge came from a suspension bridge at Hungerford, Berkshire. This makes the chains at Clifton third-hand (!) I have to say I am not confident enough to add this bit of history to the main article - I will go away and check my facts. Rickedmo 21:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See relevant volume of the Survey of London  The article probably needs some mention of the former Hungerford Market.--Lang rabbie 22:06, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the title needs to be changed to the Golden Jubilee Bridges. Its former name can then be mentioned in the article.
:Only the two pedestrian bridges are called the Golden Jubilee Bridges. MRSC 20:11, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Title 
Talk:Anthony Tudor

message: Antony Tudor is spelled without an "h" in the first name. I corrected body of page, but was not able to edit the heading. How do I do that?
: There is a page for "Antony Tudor", so we have 2 separate pages with different content and different spelling of his surname.  They need to be merged (or whatever the technical term is).   JackofOz 01:19, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Antony seems to be the correct spelling judging by other websites. The content of this article is already present in the new one, the only thing missing was the image which I just added. Should I go ahead and make this a redirect to Antony Tudor? --Perkmashin 01:39, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NGC 6397

message: Was it parallax or what? All I can find is that it's from the HST. Lehasa (talk) 17:51, 25 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How exactly was the distance to NGC 6397 measured?
Talk:The Southern Review

message: The Southern Review was started in 1935, with the first issue being published in July of that year.  It continued publication until 1942, after 28 issues, and started again in 1965.
More critical reception is available and will be referenced.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by There Is No Me (talk • contribs) 17:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Appletons' article on Stephen Elliott reports the naturalist Stephen Elliott and the writer William Elliot respectively editing and publishing in a journal called the Southern Review in the 19th century. See  Bob Burkhardt (talk) 17:44, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: An earlier ''Southern Review''?

message: I noticed a few errors/dead links on the Southern Review page but didn't want to edit myself as I'm a member of staff at its sister institution, LSU Press.
1. The 4th citation under "References" include dead links. Suggested replacement for citation #4 is the CELJ awards page, as the LSU press release page is no longer active.
2. The 2005 date for the CELJ Award is incorrect and should be 2006.
3. The 5th citation under "References" is a link that is no longer active. Suggested replacement is the updated Southern Review "About" page.
2620:105:B003:6100:3D59:E346:782A:6593 (talk) 18:28, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Fortunately, there was a copy of citation #4 in the Internet Archive, so simply changed the link to the archived version. The CELJ Award date has been corrected. As for citation #5, we want to verify the claim that Adams and Faust became co-editors, which isn't mentioned on the suggested replacement page. Therefore, I have flagged the original citation as a dead link. Altamel (talk) 22:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request of July 27 
Talk:Hardcore dancing

message: I've done a complete re-write, I've still left the unreferenced tag on, because it is incredibly difficult to find references for this!  I've included an opposition section to try and get it in a more neutral point of view.  I've tried my best and will continue looking for citation, any help would be much appreciated.  Asics talk Editor review! 23:13, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write 

message: The first paragraph of the Criticism section is not neutral. Jasontheperson (talk) 10:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: I think this page should be semi-protected because of constant vandalism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by NewYorkStyledCheesecakes (talk • contribs) 21:00, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, this is Wikipedia, not YouTube, so its not the place for scenesters and metalheads to be battling it out, but I couldn't resist this one, what do you think is so hard and skillful about jumping around and swinging your arms like a little spastic monkey?--Metalhead94 (talk) 22:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lock
Talk:Plouto (mother of Tantalus)

message: The article says that "Her parents were Oceanus and Tethys (thus making Plouto one of the 3000 Oceanids) or Himas". Should I interpret the parents of Plouto to be either Oceanus and Tethys or Oceanus and Himas or Himas alone? It's not quite clear.
ICE77 (talk) 04:56, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. 82.11.175.22 (talk) 19:33, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed "Her parents were Oceanus and Tethys (thus making Plouto one of the 3000 Oceanids)" from the article. The Oceanid (Plouto (Oceanid)) is different from this Plouto. Paul August ☎ 11:07, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parentage
Talk:Feline infectious peritonitis

message: Could someone please supply a chart showing relative titer counts to severity of the infection?  Fifteen years ago my cat Bobby was exposed to a Kitten with FIP that later died.  At that point Bobby's titer was 1600.  He never developed the disease although it was five or six months before his titer was bacK in normal range.  Our vet advised re-vaccinating him immediately and then having his blood checKed for the next six months which we did.Risssa (talk) 22:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titer/titre 

message: The article states, without citation, that the wet form is more common, but that's contradicted by the Vetinfo.com source cited at note 2.
Anyone knowledgeable here? --Tbanderson (talk) 16:15, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: When my kitten had it and I was researching the condition, everything I ran across said wet form was more common, but I was mostly looking at the "Dr. Schmoo the veterinarian with info about cats with FIP" sites, and- um- wikipedia - so I haven't gone over the peer-reviewed literature. I'd be interested in what the research says.  Unfortunately, I have other rodeos (and horse races) that I'm spending my wiki-time on, so I must be the other animals and let The Little Red Hen do the work here... wherever she is... Montanabw(talk) 17:19, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wet or dry more common? 

message: I found a good study on the condition and it's prevalence by breed type but I'm not sure where would be appropriate to include (if appropriate at all). 
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1098612X12441875 Traumnovelle (talk) 03:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where to list risk factors/prevalence in breeds?
Talk:Kenny Dykstra

message: * (Discuss) – :Kenny Dykstra →  – [This page should revert back to its original name.]City of Tragedy (talk) 23:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Ford Focus RS WRC

message: I think this page should be moved to Ford Focus WRC. -- Andy29 23:34, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the page. NSR (talk) 23:39, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I've cleaned it up a bit too. Andy29 00:07, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: It has been suggested by User:OSX that this article be merged into Ford Focus (first generation) and Ford Focus (second generation, Europe). Prolog (talk) 07:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *The article doesn't include the results table yet (see Lancia 037). That will be long and at least 20KB, and Ford Focus (first generation) is already over 70KB. Readers shouldn't have to hop between two articles to see the results either. Prolog (talk) 10:18, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *Well some trimming may well be necessary then, is it always necessary for about 2 pages of engine sizes or trim levels? The size is a guide not an absolute rule, it's quality over quantity so i still support a merge. Thanks Jenova20 10:32, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Neste Oil Rally 2010 - Jari-Matti Latvala in shakedown.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 25, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-03-25. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 19:37, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Neste Oil Rally 2010 - Jari-Matti Latvala in shakedown.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: The wheelbase data (1800mm) in the article seems way too short; it is rather about 2500mm.--89.132.88.168 (talk) 22:04, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wheelbase error?
Template talk:Linux

message: I think that it would be good to have a link to DistroWatch in the template because it is useful and viable, unlike some things which are currently in the template. Just sayin'... 159.83.54.2 (talk) 03:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: . Thanks for bringing that up! - Ahunt (talk) 13:05, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 20 December 2017: Please add to Media section: website 'DistroWatch' 

message: request for editing 2402:1980:81C4:6648:3D87:9832:2302:D12 (talk) 23:56, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: As the template says "This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y"."  You need to state exactly what you think should be changed so other editors can assess it and see if it should be changed or not. - Ahunt (talk) 00:39, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 August 2018 

message: Could the "Phoronix" entry be removed here, since the article was deemed non-notable? --213.216.211.142 (talk) 16:52, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it is a legitimate link to an actual article. Your edit history seems to show you are on some sort of vendetta against this subject. You should probably read WP:AXE. - Ahunt (talk) 17:08, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 July 2021
Talk:Maues

message: Maues calls himself "Great King of Kings", and this is in fact a rather megalomanic version of the traditional Persian title ( by this time, this was too early to call it a traditional Parthian title), and anyway the Parthians took the title from the Seleucids who took it from the Achaemenids.
--Sponsianus 23:47, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eric Bibb

message: He deserves a page of his own as he is one of the great unsung blues singer/songwriters. I haven't got the time to do it myelf. Hopefully someone else will. Algrif 12:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the speedy tag, a search around google provides plenty of evidence of notabillity. NSR (talk) 23:58, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been suggested (see edit history of main article) that there might be a copyvio from the artist's web site. The reality is that the information on the web site was taken directly from this article (in an earlier incarnation). As this article predates the web site information, there is no copyvio. -- ALGRIF talk 12:56, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:The gospel

message: This article is missing its an important attribute. That is an explanation of what the original Koine Greek word says in Koine Greek. The article tells us how it is translated which is definitely not the same as telling us what the Koine Greek meant. Here are two relevant examples of what is missing:
:Pentecost (Ancient Greek: πεντηκοστή [ἡμέρα], pentekostē [hēmera], "the fiftieth day") 
:
:The term "Pentateuch" (Πεντάτευχος, literally "five cases") is a Greek word used to refer to the "Five Books of Moses." The first known use of this term dates to circa 150-175 CE, and it is used by Origen, Athanasius, and Tertullian, among others.
Nick Beeson (talk) 10:32, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning and Origin of Greek

message: Leaving aside the mess from having forked this in the first place and then moving it to such a bad/misformatted title, currently "Evangel" redirects here. Evangel can be the Evangelium, but more often it's the specific separate gospels or, still more often, the saints who wrote them. — LlywelynII 12:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Evangel
Talk:At Home with Their Greatest Hits

message: Shouldn't Gelbwaks also be listed under Fictional personnel, since he was their original "drummer" ? Varlaam (talk) 02:17, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gelbwaks
Talk:Pulaski (tool)

message: I did a hunt on Google for a gov't picture but had no luck.--Knife Knut 00:43, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a NPS photo that I can put up but it's not that good.  I'll see if I can dig up a good photo and post it. Kaibabsquirrel 02:58, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

text: that would be an adze i think Clinchfield (talk) 01:57, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free picture 

message: The image shows dangerous use -- at least unpaid volunteers are not allowed to utilize the tool in any way that has the tool over one's head. It's trivial, but it also does not show a good example of the tool so if anyone has a replacement, I would vote to have the existing photograph swapped out with something else. Damotclese (talk) 01:36, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made a note of this in the caption. Feezo (Talk) 23:25, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a start. }:-} When fire crews are utilizing them, they're usually grubbing out a fire line close to the ground, wearing gloves, helmets, goggles, all that PPE that are required. Actully looking at the Wiki entry it looks like the whole article could use some additional examples of how the tool is used in the real world. Forest Service trail workers (paid employees or volunteers) utilize the tool a lot, of course. Maybe I should add some field usage text referenced to Forest Service web pages. Damotclese (talk) 15:34, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image — dangerous use 

message: Is adze really an accurate description of the hoe end?  My understanding is that an adze is specifically designed for shaving layers of wood, while the hoe end of a pulaski is designed for... hoeing.
The article used to use the word mattock, which is very similar to a pulaski, and it's wiki page also says the hoe end is an adze, which i also disagree with.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newellshk (talk • contribs) 21:03, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adze vs hoe vs mattock 

message: Zackmann08, I merely read the cited sources logically, and reworded the info with grammar; no OP. The only PROMO I am supporting is fact and readable grammar. 7&6=thirteen made a bit of a mess with his good but sloppy contributions, and what he left was nearly unintelligible, and what was understandable was factually incorrect. But if you prefer the nonsense that now lies there, I guess that is your prerogative. Sadsaque (talk) 14:27, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Copy edited.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

text: Sadsaque (talk) I did not get to see the proposed changes that you made, would you please post them in Talk:: here so that I can see them? If there are factually incorrect things in this page, I would like to have them corrected. If Zackmann08 reverted legitimate corrections, let's step through them and adopt those with suitable references and citations, please. Thanks! Damotclese (talk) 16:05, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The changes are the last 2 in history. The cites were existing. Sadsaque (talk) 17:53, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum exhibits - 1 or 2?
Talk:Multimedia Fusion

message: I really like this program, but is there a mac version? Can anyone help? Thanks.
:K&P had a Mac version, but that'd be somewhat primitive. No other klik products to date have had Mac versions, but IIRC MMF2 (due soonish) will have the ability to build Mac applications. I doubt there'll be a Mac version of the editor. Radix 11:32, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  For Mac? 

message: I'm thinking about making a fangame this summer.  Do I need Multimedia Fusion to provide enough resources for a Sonic-themed game, or could I get the Games Factory instead?
*You only need The Games Factory, but I'd get Multimedia Fusion because it's much more stable and powerful. Rapidflash 04:58, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Side Scrollers? 

message: Notice emphasis on "no script whatsoever".  This comes across to me as sounding more of a marketing speak than accurate encyclopaedic fact.
* Seconded. This article was clearly written by an 'MMF' enthusiast, to provide advertising as opposed to factual information. RW.
* I've made an attempt to change it. Quite a large section of the article had a similar tone. - DXN
* But the fact is that there IS no scripting in it at all. It is all an event-based point-and-click affair. - suspchaos
* Another MMF user reporting in. There is no scripting. MMF applications are created in an event editor. All point and click amazingly. Go look for yourself. It's not even possible to write any code.
* I agree. Volunteers are trying to implement a scripting extension, but original MMF and all other "Klik" versions are not based on any scripts at all. - Imp
* Most people would agree that not having scripting is a bad thing.  I don't see how acknowledging the lack of scripting is a form of advertising. 72.150.79.216 23:35, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: What's better for making Sonic and Mario games?  I plan on starting my own series of each and I need to know.
*MMF is definately better for making mario or sonic games, there is even a website that has many tutorials and examples of a sonic game in MMF, also MMF is a much better game creator(in my opinion).
*What's the web address of that site?  I could really use some help starting with my games.
*Sonic Fangames HQ for Sonic-themed games and Mario Fan Games Galaxy for Mario-themed games. - suspchaos
::I've seen good Sonic engines done in both. I do feel that MMF is generally superior, but it's a good idea to try both and see which you prefer. Radix 05:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MMF or Gamemaker
Talk:List of current MLB players

message: * List of current MLB players is out of date. Players have moved around or changed uniform numbers. Some teams are using the same uniform number more than once (Ex. Baltimore Orioles using #8 twice). Teams assign one uniform number per player. The trading deadline is approaching, so many MLB team rosters and player uniform numbers could change again. There is also no uniform way of ordering players on each team roster. Win777 15:19, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:List of albinos

message: I'm not sure we can classify albinos as having disabilities per se..  --Hooperbloob 00:49, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. To avoid the problem altogether, why not turn this list into purely a category? It's an interesting idea, but the main value of lists over categories is to deal with controversial or complicated concepts by allowing us to list information on each entry in the list. I don't believe that is necessary in this case. Plus the list is so short that we can just list the most noteworthy people here in albinism, can't we? -Silence 21:28, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Statistics Canada

message: Why don't we have a photo of the StatsCan HQ at Tunney's Pasture?  I'm asking this because I notice that in the Wikipedia article about the Australian Bureau of Statistics, they have a photo of the HQ building in Canb'ra.
--Atikokan (talk) 02:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Most likely, nobody has a picture readily available under a license that's Wiki-friendly. You're welcome to see if you can find something, of course. The the public domain image resources guide may be helpful. --Xanzzibar (talk) 09:33, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo, Tunney's Pasture 

message: Looks like the United States is starting to take action: Talk:United_States_Congress#In_the_news Ottawahitech (talk) 17:49, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will Canada also act to stop insider trading? 

message: In the census section a paragraph incorrectly states that the most recent census took place in 2016. The most recent census took place in 2021. Sink Cat (talk) 15:33, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Census