lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Blue (1993 film)

message: "The film's final moments consist of a set of names, being repeated. "John. Daniel. Howard. Graham. Terry. Paul". These names are all former lovers and friends of Jarman who had died of AIDS."
The film does not end as described above in the Wikipedia article, instead it ens with the words, "And our lives will run like sparks through the stubble. I place a delphinium, Blue, upon your grave." 
The words mentioned above are in fact spoken near the beginning of the film, about 6 minutes in... 2A00:23C7:608E:A401:1BA:1DA9:4FE0:E6F3 (talk) 10:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The film's final moments consist of a set of names, being repeated..."
Talk:Edison's Black Maria

message: Lots of light because of the very short exposure times with Dickson´s Kinetograph. Read about the frame rate of around 46 a second and narrow shutter angle in: The Life And Inventions of Thomas Alva Edison by Dickson; Chatto & Windus, New York and London, 1894. --80.219.134.186 13:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Moved to here the following: "*Edison's Black Maria studio is used in Hans-Jürgen Syberberg's movie ¨Hitler: ein Film aus Deutschland¨ in which it appears as a décor for some scenes. It also appears contained in a glass paper weight filled with snow as a representation of the Grail." Does it appear in the film in a paperweight or as a full sized model? Unclear. Is there a reference to substantiate these claimns, besides the film itself? Edison (talk) 18:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Found ref for this and will add it back to the article. Edison (talk) 18:50, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced popular culture
Talk:Communism in Colombia

message: Please be sure to include reasons for majors changes. This page could benefit from more citations and inclusion of Fidel Castro's reported experiences during the Bogotazo.
Mrtony77 (talk) 19:19, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions

message: The article needs to be cleaned up, notably because several of its sections are written in an informal and/or exceedingly argumentative tone, to the point of its adherence to NPOV being in question as a result. Juancarlos2004 02:52, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: JEG was hardly a communist. A left-leaning populist, progressive liberal, social democrat possibly. But not a communist per se. --Soman 10:16, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And it should also be noted that he wasn't on good terms with the Communist Party at the time either, to say the least. Juancarlos2004 17:30, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gaitan

message: The content of this article has nothing to do with the subject. It is a political history of the colombian left at best. It is in no way a history of communism in colombia. 70.234.229.38 (talk) 03:24, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This article has no value
Talk:Central Station (film)

message: I removed a statement that the older brothers realize the father is dead, because there is absolutely nothing in the film to indicate this. I rewatched this portion of the film a few times to confirm this. He has only been gone six months; Isaías and Josué are adamant that they think he will return; and even Moisés, who doesn't think he will return, and says so repeatedly, doesn't give any indication that he thinks he is dead.cswpride (talk) 07:51, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Father's Death
Talk:Cinema Novo

message: Give some examples!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.98.159.158 (talk) 19:09, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has recently been edited by students as part of their course work for a university course.  As part of the quality metrics for the education program, we would like to determine what level of burden is placed on Wikipedia's editors by student coursework.
If you are an editor of this article who spent time correcting edits to it made by the students, please tell us how much time you spent on cleaning up the article.  Please note that we are asking you to estimate only the negative effects of the students' work.  If the students added good material but you spent time formatting it or making it conform to the manual of style, or copyediting it, then the material added was still a net benefit, and the work you did improved it further.  If on the other hand the students added material that had to be removed, or removed good material which you had to replace, please let us know how much time you had to spend making those corrections. This includes time you may have spent posting to the students' talk pages, or to Wikipedia noticeboards, or working with them on IRC, or any other time you spent which was required to fix problems created by the students' edits. Any work you did as a Wikipedia Ambassador for that student's class should not be counted.
Please rate the amount of time spent as follows:
* 0 -No unproductive work to clean up
* 1 - A few minutes of work needed
* 2 - Between a few minutes and half an hour of work needed
* 3 - Half an hour to an hour of work needed
* 4 - More than an hour of work needed
Please also add any comments you feel may be helpful. We welcome ratings from multiple editors on the same article. Add your input here. Thanks! -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Impact of recent student edits
Talk:London After Midnight (film)

message: Whether or not the rumor linked by Ain't it Cool News is true or a hoax, it is citable and was picked up by a legitimate news source. It is worth mentioning on the page -- maybe even moreso than the still uncited claim about the collector having a copy.--68.35.11.25 (talk) 02:38, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumor of found print 

message: I removed the reference to a surviving 9 second film clip which then linked to a YouTube posting.  On another YouTube post, it is made clear that the "surviving" clip is a hoax.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpoB-VOM1TI — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.155.101 (talk • contribs) 01:17, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The 2009 hoax clip is at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFk36pizlcM, with YouTube commenters seeming unimpressed and calling it out as a stop motion sequence made with a Sideshow Collectibles figure of the character. Someone tried to add it to Commons but it's up for deletion. --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:14, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Surviving" 9 second film clip 

message: Does anyone know anything about this short story the film is based on, "The Hypnotist"? I can't seem to find any information about it except that the film is based on it. It would be an awfully strange coincidence if both the film and the short story were lost. Is it in print?
BrokenEye3 (talk) 11:25, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Hypnotist" 

message: The page was recently updated to claim the film has been found as of June 2, 2022. No source for this is provided making the claim dubious. 73.158.29.217 (talk) 18:23, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source missing for claim that the film has been found 

message: The article contains the words, “…exhumes Roger Balfour's tomb to find it empty.” I don’t think that this makes sense, as you don’t exhume a tomb, you exhume a body. One might “attempt to exhume (the body of) Roger Balfour, but find the tomb empty”, or “…open Roger Balfour’s tomb and find it empty”, but you certainly don’t have an exhumation if there isn’t a body. Jock123A (talk) 12:49, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing statement… 

message: The novel Antkind by Charlie Kaufmann directly references this film in Chapter 77, and a lot of the plot bears a relation—-the protagonist is being hypnotized trying to recall a film that was destroyed in a fire. 70.108.19.121 (talk) 05:37, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antkind
Talk:Mark of the Vampire

message: Count Mora sports a bullet wound to the head (by make up artist William J. Tuttle) which is not explained in the cut version of the film. Rumor is it had something to do with the incest subplot. Naaman Brown (talk) 14:12, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  cut scenes 

message: The 1957 film "The Vampire" was released for TV viewing as "Mark of the Vampire" --Naaman Brown (talk) 00:28, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  title reused 

message: The first section of the article mentions that this film is a remake of the now-lost silent film London After Midnight "with some characters' names and some circumstances changed. Does anyone know the specifics of those changes? I just saw the film, and I'm trying to mentally reconstruct what London After Midnight might have been like. BrokenEye3 (talk) 04:33, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  What "characters' names and some circumstances"?
Talk:Of Mice and Men (1939 film)

message: "The cinematic release of the film ran 111 minutes, while later video and DVD versions ran 106 minutes due to the different frame rates between film and video."
Sound film runs at 24fps, North American video at 30fps (60 fields per second, interlaced). A system called "2:3 pulldown" allows the rates to be matched by repeating some of the video fields between frames. The film and the home video should have exactly the same running times.
Now, if the writer was referring to a transfer at the European-standard video rate of 25 fps... Such a transfer is (too-)often made by simply running the film at 25fps (4% faster). This would produce the timings given. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 01:40, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Differing frame rates?

message: Steinbeck himself wrote  the stage version of his novel. Here, the producers of said play are listed as though they were writers. I think this should be fixed. 24.148.26.74 (talk) 17:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Writing credits?
Talk:Representation of the People Act 1884

message: An actual estimate of the adult male population in 1884 would be helpful. I have failed to find one. The quoted statistic, from Britannica 1911, suggests a total population for the UK (1884), which suggests adult male population of about 10 million, depending on demographics; but can anyone get a more precise figure?Septentrionalis 03:01, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This suggests 28.5% of adults, so presumably ~57% of adult males, so an electorate of 5.5m means about 10,000,000 population. It looks like a decent guess. Shimgray | talk | 12:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This link to WikiSource in section "See also" doesn't work. There is no page in WikiSource with this name. Searching somebody to fix this -- T.seppelt (talk) 17:35, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to WikiSource
Talk:Tuvalu (film)

message: Currently there's a gushing review of this movie from some site that's apparently used with permission.  Even so, I think maybe we shouldn't use the review at all since the review is rather far from neutral about the movie.  --Mr. Billion 01:57, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Film review

message: Bookmarking 3 positive reviews, 2 mildly negative.
* Leonard Maltin, 151 Best Movies You've Never Seen, HarperCollins, 2010. Part 137.
* Kevin Thomas, Movie Review; Offbeat 'Tuvalu' Casts Its Own Quirky Spell. Los Angeles Times - February 1, 2002.
* Stephen Holden, Tuvalu (1999) review. New York Times, December 7, 2001.
* Patrick Z. McGavin Nearly wordless `Tuvalu' is too repetitive. Chicago Tribune, February 1, 2002. P. 4. "French actor Denis Lavant -- the star of Leos Carax's early films and, more recently, Claire Denis' "Beau Travail," and a man who bears a striking resemblance to Buster Keaton -- plays Anton, a young dreamer whose blind father runs the bathhouse. Through a series of deceptive practices, Anton has convinced his father that the bathhouse is filled with customers. Anton's brother Gregor (Terrence Gillespie) is a ruthless industrialist who wants desperately to destroy the building and erect a futuristic city in its place. But that struggle is soon replaced by the movie's dominant story line, Anton's falling in love with a beautiful 18-year-old girl, Eva (Chuplan Hamatova)." "A fascinating work that never quite coalesces, Tuvalu finally becomes oppressively repetitive."
*Mick LaSalle Tuvalu. San Francisco Chronicle. December 14, 2001. "An extended attempt to make a film of this kind, is a disappointment, a precious and grotesque exercise reminiscent of Jean-Pierre Jeunet's "Delicatessen," only less amusing."
--Lexein (talk) 10:01, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s)
Talk:The Mark of Zorro (1920 film)

message: The version of "The Mark of Zorro" that Bruce Wayne saw as a boy was 1940 version, starring Tyrone Power.  This is clearly stated in "The Dark Knight Returns" and other Batman comics.  I'm moving this section to the entry about the 1940 movie.(72.144.183.207 23:49, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting Batman connection section 

message: Given that this was originally a silent film, does anyone know the history of the various musical scores added to various editions?  The version linked to at the Internet Archive has a (rather mangled) orchestral score with some recognizable classical themes, but no info that I could find on its origins.  The DVD version from Kino (http://www.amazon.com/Mark-Zorro-Don-Son/dp/B000067IYE/) has a piano score, and I think possibly some history to go along with it, but I don't have access to the DVD to check that at the moment.  John lindgren (talk) 18:01, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical scores? 

message: I've tagged this as dubious - the linked website makes no reference to Zorro and the connection between these two productions appears very weak. - Peripitus (Talk) 01:40, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen of Swords connection
Talk:Aelita

message: This article has a lot of original research. Someone fix it. I'm lazy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.233.126.121 (talk) 04:32, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are no English subtitles even when English is selected through the Russian menu. Certain other languages also fail.
However, French and Spanish both work. Varlaam (talk) 07:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defective Ruscico DVD 

message: This article is way too short and should be expanded in more detail.--Paleface Jack (talk) 22:03, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:The Man in the Iron Mask (film)

message: Someone has posted a tag about splitting into a disambig page...makes sense to me, this is already the way things are with The Count of Monte Cristo (film). Akradecki 02:04, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've changed the page into a disambiguation page. -- Grandpafootsoldier 20:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig?
Talk:The Great Waltz (musical)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:44, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 March 2022
Talk:Edmore, Michigan

message: I moved the following chunk of text here from the article. It looks like much of this might ba able to be used. It needs to be wikified, and of course, some sort of verifiable source cited. older ≠ wiser 03:05, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Rogue Song

message: It should be notable for the article that this film was not made in the legendary three-color Technicolor of 1932 onwards (which wasn't even used at least in part in a feature film until 1934, and not for an entire feature up until 1935). It was made in Technicolor system 3, an early, experimental two-color process that only recorded red and green color. Sources: , . --2003:EF:13C1:CE26:6901:1B33:FF4A:F368 (talk) 23:09, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technicolor
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lee Hotti

message: KEEP IT!!!! The LeeHottie topic on Sherdog.com has reached global proportions. The fact that a simple thread turned out over 1,000,000 (1 million) views in less than a week is historic by any measure. Add to the fact that the thread has been linked from various web-sites around the world and you truly have something that is of legendary status. This will be one for the ages and is sure to be a part of the American folk lore/legends. Dkd4 03:19, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Babes in Toyland (1934 film)

message: This article was missing spoiler tags. Please include them for the benefit of viewers who have not seen the films. (64.12.116.196 16:47, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers 

message: I have a good publicity still from this film, and I am trying to find out if this film is in the public domain, for copyright reasons. I found the publicity still in a thrift store in the Los Angeles area; it is different from the other pictures already in this article, and it would add to this article. It looks like it was tossed out by a theatre operator. How do I find out if the copyright for this film - or any film, for that matter - has lapsed and fallen into the public domain?
Thanks. JGKlein (talk) 20:16, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked . It wasn't very enlightening i'm afraid. Szzuk (talk) 19:07, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be a simple question to ask of the people who provide copyright:  The Copyright Office: http://www.copyright.gov/ -- kosboot (talk) 14:38, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a publicity still from this film, and I am trying to find out if this film is in the public domain, for copyright reasons. 

message: This article is missing important information on the film's production. This needs to be added to the article so that it completely covers it's information and meets Wikipiedia's standards of a well developed article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 20:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Production section 
Talk:The Big Noise (1944 film)

message: Please can you create this page in italian? Because also in Italy we like Laurel & Hardy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.53.240.108 (talk) 13:58, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: To create this page in italian
Talk:Atoll K

message: Contradictory statements are made concerning availability of the French version.  is followed immediately by: . How can it be "not available for public viewing" when a DVD is available?  JGHowes   talk 12:57, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: The section on the production of the film is word-for-word the same as the "Troubled Production" section of the film's entry at the TV Tropes website here. Since the information here is actually source-cited, I'm going to assume it's the TV Tropes contributor that copied the text, but I thought I'd call attention to this in case someone with a TV Tropes account can reword that version, or someone who has the desire can reword the version here so they aren't identical. 23skidoo (talk) 22:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyvio by somebody 

message: Hi, It was first released in UK, so the UK law should be used, and it is not in the public domain there. Also copyright in USA may be renewed because of URAA. So I removed the category :Category:Films in the public domain. Yann (talk) 17:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status
Talk:The Great Santini

message: I see no justification is categorizing this film as such. Alcarillo 18:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  American propaganda film category 

message: Was there really an animated series, or is that information a mistake? I cannot find any info related to a cartoon, and the info is unsourced. LizardJr8 (talk) 09:09, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't look verifiable to me. It's from an IP who has made a LOT of similar questionable "animated series" additions to some other articles, and as you can see from the recent spat on the article history, there's at least one other person who had this concern. Tagged for now. - Vianello (Talk) 09:28, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animated Series 

message: The "References" section, in its present form, is confusing. It should be titled "In Popular Culture" and "References" should be populated only with reflink material.  I will correct this presently. Xela Zeugirdor (talk) 21:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical Changes 

message: Resolved confusion in "References" section, and created a new section: "Crossover into popular culture." Xela Zeugirdor (talk) 21:48, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Great Clarification
Talk:Electronic Labyrinth: THX 1138 4EB

message: Anyone know where the credit for Mark O'Donnell came from? Other than things that reference this page, I can find nothing that links him to this film, or the full length version, and he is not credited in the film either.
I will remove the reference until someone else can provide a citation. --Doconeill (talk) 01:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Credits

message: As far as I can tell, in EL:THX11384EB and in the theatrical film, people are either roommates or they are not. No references to marriage exist in either film. However, I will not change the entry, as it is possible that Lucas has stated that the two were married in an interview or something that I'm not aware of. 75.79.56.202 (talk) 09:05, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wife? Husband?

message: Is this the Version with Robert Duval and Donald Pleasance? 
Is the original with Dan Nachtsheim available for viewing/purchasing? K E Melton (talk) 16:30, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1971 Reworked Version
Category talk:Administrative law

message: Because this section refers to branches of government, I have qualified it by adding a reference to the United States. I am an American attorney and I am therefore familiar primarily with U.S. law; presumably many other countries do not have three separate "branches" of government (legislative, executive, judicial). Perhaps this section should be amended and broadened by someone with familiarity with the "administrative" law of other countries. Famspear 03:11, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand to include other countries?
Talk:Hair (film)

message: The "Horn" included as a reference is not properly cited. There's no book title! Was it taken from a larger article?
I removed Ruhlmann's (allmusic.com) criticism of the film, which is taken from his review of the soundtrack, because it appears to have been written years later and therefore not indicative of the reaction the film received in its own time.
Zip-x (talk) 12:53, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I deleted the "Time Out" review. 
First, Time Out is a bird cage wrapper, one of those advertising distribution schemes rather than any sort of actual publication with credibility. Second, the review is by "AC", which you can verify here :
http://www.timeout.com/london/film/hair-1979
Who the hell is "AC" ? Somebody's mom ? A disgruntled octogenarian ? The secretary of the local John Birch Society ? What are this person's credentials as a movie reviewer ? We don't know and can't tell. As such, this is definitely not a reputable, verifiable source. The co-called "review" is incompetent, irrelevant, and immaterial. As such, I removed it, Your Honor. 210.22.142.82 (talk) 11:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Time Out" removal 

message: By 1977 and 1979, Hippies were long gone, with Punk, Disco, etc. being en vogue. Why took it so long to make a movie from a musical? The Woodstock (film) was out in 1970 already, and quite successful. Matthead  Discuß   13:52, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Best guess: financing. Second guess: copyright negotiations, possibly related to financing. DOR (HK) (talk) 00:13, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why so late?