lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Order of the Redeemer

message: Most of the recent changes have been helpful, but I don't really like the changes made to the insignia section, made in December but which I only noticed today.  First of all, the original small caps used to quote the capitalized Greek on the badge look neater and don't overwhelm the lower-case text like the current caps do.  Second, the translation is too informal-sounding.  This is Septuagint Greek which would sound very formal and archaizing to a modern Greek spaker, and I think it deserves the archaizing KJV English translation to reflect this.  If the medal sai «Το χέρι σου...» etc. it would be a different story. Thirdly, someone deleted the chapter and verse, which make it easier for the reader to look up the passage quoted if he so chooses. I'm restoring the section to the way it was.  --Jpbrenna 05:50, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note on the cross: we were both technically incorrect. If you go to the official webpage and look at images of the medal, and then consult the cross article it is clear the shape of cross used is not a Greek cross, nor a Maltese.  Rather, it is a Cross pattée - a common form for military medals.  A Greek cross has arms of perfectly equal length with no flaring, and the Maltese is indented at the end. --Jpbrenna 05:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I've put in some links to the religious concepts and tidied up the English in a few spots.  I also looked at the official website again, and while it uses the modernist translation quoted, I think that's rather bad form, and I'm writing to the webmaster to tell him so.  The original Greek is in the nominative, but this modernist translation begins with a prepositional phrase, so it fails on technical grounds.  Stylistically, it really sounds way too casual, entirely losing the gravitas of the Greek (and, I would presume, the Hebrew).  You would never hear a Bible verse way in an Orthodox church in America, even one that has switched entirely to English for its liturgy. So, let's keep the KJV translation, and hopefully we can get them to change the website. --Jpbrenna 06:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: British officers were appointed as Grand Cross/Grand Commander/Commander/Officer/Chevalier but the last two are not mentioned. Anybody know if Officer and Chevalier are the English terms for the "Gold Cross" and "Silver Cross" and if so should it be mentioned in the text, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 17:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Officer of the Order of the Redeemer

message: I was working on a page of someone who had received this award when I realized this is one of the awards without a corresponding category page. Would it be fine for me to make a category page for this rather than list it out here? Bgrus22 (talk) 22:19, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should a category of recipients be established?
Talk:Old Order Mennonite

message: This article could benefit a lot from the content in Stephen Scott's 1995 survey of 'old fashioned' Mennonite groups.  He shows the distinct Old Order groups in detail, explains their historical roots, and distinguishes them from other Conservative Mennonite Movement groups that have Amish roots.  It is also an interesting book that makes these people come alive with pictures which might be valuable here too. Anacapa 05:55, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Old Order and Conservative Mennonite Groups''

message: Well, there is a dispute tag on this article, but nothing on the talk page.  Any reason why this shouldn't be promptly removed? Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 19:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it.  If there is some that is disputed, please put it back on and post on the talk page. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 18:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute tag 

message: The lede says Although the term strictly refers to one particular group but then totally fails to define that group. Who are the OOM, where do they live, how many are there, and how do they differ from other horse and buggy Mennonites and Amish? Is there any theological belief they hold that is different than other M groups? Sorry to be such a nag but this article is pretty vague. Nitpyck (talk) 16:57, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  not very helpful 

message: I don't know how much of this article is copied from sources - without any citation either - but I found a large section in Beliefs and practices that is just copied from http://www.gutenberg.us/articles/eng/Old_Order_Mennonites 
I will paraphrase that content in my edit and add the citation. However, I may not finish all of that this morning. AND there may be many other areas of this article that are copied from various sources. Peter K Burian (talk) 14:24, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism is not allowed
Talk:.204 Ruger

message: In the 'characteristics' section, the article states that "only the European 5.6x50mm is larger" when referencing the 204 Rugers history and development from the .222 Rem Mag
This is problematic on several levels, because not only does a rimmed version of the 5.6x50 exist, but the case capacity for both is listed at 34gr H20 while the old .22 Savage Hi Power has a nominal volume of 35gr H20.
So there are actually at least 3 .22 center fire factory rounds that have larger case capacities than the .222 Remington, NOT one as the article states. mr.trooper 173.161.127.214 (talk) 01:30, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomenclature

message: The WPMILHIST tag has been removed due to this article not being military related.--Oldwildbill 13:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Again. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 06:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST
Talk:National Foundation Day (Korea)

message: Origin  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nccmyheart (talk • contribs) 07:21, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 17:45, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Gaecheonjeol →  – Nearly certain "National Foundation Day" is the WP:COMMONNAME. Based on a crude Google Books search, "gaecheonjeol" gets 527 hits and "national foundation day"+"korea" gets 3,490.
It's also the name in English that the South Korean government seems to consistently use.
Think the main undesirable thing is the name overlap with the Japanese article for their respective holiday, but I think not a big deal. Btw, choosing "Korea" for the disambig because NK kinda celebrates it too on the same day, although not officially. toobigtokale (talk) 16:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 October 2023
Talk:Food fight

message: I took a stab at adding categories, both highbrow and lowbrow. Not an ideal selection probably, but it's a start. Katr67 15:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories

message: We've all seen food fights in fiction, but is the actually any information on how common food fight in real life. I certainly don't remember any in my high school cafeteria.
perfectblue 18:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Real life

message: The Ivrea Carnival didn't start as a food fight. It refers to a event in Ivrea history where the knights of the local feudal land owner were stoned out of the town when sent to abduct a local beauty on her wedding night. The organges represent the cobble stones used as ammunition by the peasants. The teams who throw oranges from the ground represent the peasants, and the horse-drawn teams represent the knights. There are many other symbolic features of the Carnival that refer to the story, such as the wooden posts burned on the last night representing the castle sent up in flames by the local population to show what they thought of the Duke. It is true, of course, that the modern form of this insurrection is unusual in that the ammunition is edible, which is very welcome on a hot day. Mercenario1991 (talk) 14:28, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ivrea Carnival 

message: Needs a mention and/or reference to the Bugsy Malone Splurge Gun, and a disabiguation page to distinguish this page from the british tv campaign "The Great British Food Fight" by celebrity chefs Hugh Fernley Whittingstall, Jamie Oliver and Gordon Ramsay.
See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugh_Fearnley-Whittingstall#Chicken_Out.21_campaign, and Jamie's Fowl Dinners.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.239.100 (talk) 19:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biger Issues 
Talk:Gargoyle gecko

message: Per WP:COMMONNAME, shouldn't the article be titled Gargoyle Gecko?  "New Caledonian bumpy gecko" is a relatively rare way of referring to this species, from what I can tell.  And the article even states it's more commonly known as a "Gargoyle Gecko."   Mbinebri  talk ← 15:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename? 

message: Following a general trend I now see is basically on all wikipedia pages about nocturnal gecko species kept in captivity - a person or group of persons has edited these pages to say that the species is crepuscular instead of nocturnal. This has occurred on the leopard gecko page, the african fat tailed gecko page, the crested gecko page, and the leachianus gecko page. In every instance I have uncovered so far, the sources cited on the page say the species is nocturnal, but the editor(s) have changed the page to say the species is crepuscular, leaving the citation stating it is nocturnal in place, so it appears their position has a citation when it does not. Interestingly, species of the same genera that are not kept as pets in captivity appear to all be listed as nocturnal without any interference, so these changes appear to be related to pet keepers. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Common_leopard_gecko#Discussion:_Nocturnal_vs._Crepuscular_vs._Cathemeral for a more extensive representative discussion.
In the case of the gargoyle gecko page, there are no contradictory citations, but there are also no citations in support of the assertion this species is crepuscular. IUCN states it is "basically nocturnal" though it may sometimes rest exposed during the day. I have marked the assertion on this page as "citation needed" and mention it here as it appears to be part of a larger systemic problem. If there are reliable sources stating this species is crepuscular, please locate and cite those sources. If there is no comment here I will be changing this page to assert the species is nocturnal as stated by IUCN. Connorlong90 (talk) 19:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the article to state this species is nocturnal and added three sources to support said assertion. Connorlong90 (talk) 04:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emergence (Nocturnal v crepuscular v cathemeral)
Talk:Ithaca Commons

message: Given that Sweden Solar System and Somerset Space Walk have their own articles, and given that the Sagan Space Walk has just been expanded to include Alpha Centauri on Hawaii (http://www.centauri-dreams.org/?p=24757), making it perhaps the largest exhibit on earth, I think it could merit an article of its own. I looked at the Wikipedia:Articles for creation article but, honestly, I don't have time to make sense of all that, so thought I'd just drop a note. -98.69.172.180 (talk) 20:41, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sagan Planet Walk article
Talk:Elizabethtown, Kentucky

message: I recently started a stub for this town near E-town, but I don't know enough about it to write an article.  Could somebody in the E-town area take a look at it?  Thanks! — Stevie is the man! Talk | Work 06:14, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Glendale, Kentucky]] article needs work
Talk:Rhacodactylus leachianus

message: Seeing as NC and NZ were once linked, might this gecko be related to Kawekaweau (Hoplodactylus delcourti), or Delcourt's giant gecko, an extinct gecko of NZ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:3462:7700:6D17:2021:3A99:1BFE (talk) 06:59, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  related to Kawekaweau (Hoplodactylus delcourti), or Delcourt's giant gecko of NZ 

message: Following a general trend I now see is basically on all wikipedia pages about nocturnal gecko species kept in captivity - a person or group of persons has edited these pages to say that the species is crepuscular instead of nocturnal. This has occurred on the leopard gecko page, the african fat tailed gecko page, the crested gecko page, and the leachianus gecko page (the page currently asserts leachies are crepuscular, then cites a source that states "Although nocturnal, the geckos sometimes bask in the morning sun.")
In every instance I have uncovered so far, the sources cited on the page say the species is nocturnal, but the editor(s) have changed the page to say the species is crepuscular, leaving the citation stating it is nocturnal in place, so it appears their position has a citation when it does not. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Common_leopard_gecko#Discussion:_Nocturnal_vs._Crepuscular_vs._Cathemeral for a more extensive discussion. 
I will be changing this back to nocturnal - if there are reliable sources stating this species is crepuscular, please locate and cite those sources instead of changing the article without providing a citation and leaving contradictory citations in place.  Connorlong90 (talk) 07:49, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I see this had been changed to crepuscular again, now using "the life of giant geckos" as a citation - the entire first chapter of this book discusses the authors' method of finding these geckos - going into the jungle with spotlights after sunset, which is inconsistent with the assertion of crepuscularity. The book specifically states "finding giant geckos during the day is nearly impossible. The primary method for spotting giant geckos... is to enter [the forest] at night with a powerful flashlight and run the beam up and down along tree trunks and branches" (pV). Unfounded assertions of crepuscularity and cathemerality have been a problem on other articles about species popular in herpetoculture. The fact that pet owners on Facebook have strong feelings about this topic does not mean it should be changed on an encyclopedia page with conflicting citations surreptitiously listed as supporting evidence. I have reverted back to nocturnal, please do not change it back without both reliable sources and discussion on the talk page. Connor Long (talk) 00:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emergence (Nocturnal v crepuscular v cathemeral) 

message: — Assignment last updated by JesseMorgan11 (talk) 03:02, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Developmental and Molecular Biology Spring 2023
Talk:Tirumular

message: Not correct, he is mentioned in Suntharar' Thiruthondar Thokai (7.35.5) of 8 CE, and his work & how he composed it is mentioned in Thiruthondar Thiruvanthathi (11.33.36) of 10 CE. Further the name Thirumoolar gave his work is not Thirumanthiram, the correct name is Thirumanthiramalai. Thirumanthiram the shorter form developed later.
Further it is not correct that Thirumanthiram refers to works of the Mover Muthaliyar, it is the other way around.
Please refer to this research by Vellaivaranam of Annamalai University, TN.
http://www.thevaaram.org/thirumurai_1/nayanmar_view.php?nayan_idField=14  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.43.44.5 (talk) 09:45, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is interesting. If you are sure that you are right, you may insert this information in the article by yourself. Unfortunately, I don't understand Tamil language and can't use your reference. — Cattani (talk) 02:21, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  His time 

message: We say that legend has it Tirumular was a travelling saint and scholar. Was he really a living saint? - Sitush (talk) 16:59, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saint
Talk:Diapsid

message: I think the description here should be a little clearer.  It repeatedly refers to diapsids being characterised by having two openings on either side of the skull, and yet every picture shows a skull with four openings.  I assume this means in addition to an eye and a nostril, but as it's written now that's far from clear.  While in scientific literature one could assume the reader understands this, in an encyclopaedia I think it should be explained.   76.118.92.242 (talk) 18:37, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Two holes"? 

message: Hi everyone, do you think we should merge Neodiapsida into this article? The only consistent difference between the two taxa is that Neodiapsida excludes Araeoscelidia. But recent studies (  ) have found that the araeoscelidians, if they were even reptiles at all, likely evolved their diapsid skulls independently of neodiapsids.
Therefore all undisputed diapsids are also neodiapsids, making the two taxa basically synonymous. Currently both the Diapsida and Neodiapsida articles are kinda short, and won't require much effort to merge. But should we? —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 12:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge with Neodiapsida
Talk:Archosauromorpha

message: Dinosaurs heleosaurus not able to be found. Please Give me site to get info. Animilia notresponding.
:There's no dinosaur by that name, can you double check the spelling? Are you maybe thinking of Heliocanthus, which is another name for Rioarribasuchus, an aetosaur? Dinoguy2 (talk) 21:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he is referring to the Heleosaurus that appear with a question mark in the archosauromorpha phylogeny. It was recently shown that it wasn't a diapsid at all but a varanopsid (pelycosaur) . ArthurWeasley (talk) 02:03, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help 

message: If nobody replies to this, then I may just remove it from the Archosauromorpha cladogram.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.73.93.182 (talk) 00:27, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it ain't sadly :( Golden Wraith Terror (talk) 23:19, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

text: Because Protorosauria is polyphyletic. Patachonica (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Studies which discuss Aenigmastropheus so far are by paleontologists who consider Protorosauria to not be monophyletic, so they don't use the term. Don't remove it from the Archosauromorpha cladogram because that would be misrepresenting the study which is cited. Fanboyphilosopher (talk) 03:15, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't Aenigmastropheus placed in Protorosauria?
Talk:Prolacertiformes

message: Did Prolacertiformes really exist 299 million years ago?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.175.50.105 (talk) 05:48, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I have corrected the fossil range according to PaleoBio database. MMartyniuk (talk) 12:29, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporal Range
Talk:Never Been Kissed

message: There is a discussion taking place at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Films#References_in_Popular_Culture_Project about such sections, to which you are all invited to contribute. The JPS 12:28, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Never Been Kissed

message: This movie may have been the inspiration for the Columbine High School Massacre, as it is not definite whether the initials "NBK" (used by the killers as a code for their mission) referred to Natural Born Killers (as it is often thought), or to this.
Really? Are we sure they weren't referring to the National Bank of Kuwait? Pumpkingrrl 07:07, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Columbine? 

message: The film was based on a real-life reporter's undercover exposé.  I just found this out in my journalism class, as my teacher knows the woman that Drew Barrymore's character is based on, Shann Nix.  I've added a citation.  Yeshuamyking7 22:00, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Premise

message: ref Is there a particular reason why the movie's rating in one country deserves its own section? :-) 156.34.209.205 (talk) 02:40, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating section. 

message: some of the language in this article is colloquial rather than encyclopedic, e.g. in the character profile for Anita "no strings attached". Please make the article just a tiny bit more boring, then everybody will be happy. Otherwise it is likely to be ruthless hacked around by somebody "edited mercilessly". David Woodward (talk) 01:27, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  non encylopedic language
Talk:Adolph Rickenbacker

message: Not a lot of information on the WWW on Mr Rickenbacher that I can see, perhaps I'm doing the wrong searches. Lots and lots of hits, but no biographies, and no date of death. I assume he's no longer alive (he'd be about 1,200 years old).
Several sites mention the renaming of the company to make it less German-sounding, some say at the time of the First World War (which can't be true, the company didn't exist) and some the Second, and one says both. No mention of Mr Rickenbacher changing his own name as well, although some sort of assume he did by referring to him by the ck spelling. This may be pure carelessness of course. Andrewa 06:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vice Versa (novel)

message: I'm taking out the part about the band. Not only can I not find a mention of this band in a Google search, but it is not properly formatted, lacks any official website or cite, and does not include a discography of any kind. If I am wrong and this band does require a mention on Wikipedia, then please, by all means, make an article at 'Vice Versa (band)'. IceKeyHunter 01:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 

message: Not really enough here to consider a split - perhaps after there is more to novel and film sections. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:26, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. TOM 14:47, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: split?

message: The Bleiler reference lists the Appleton (NY) edition as the first.  It is also the only edition listed on www.isfdb.org.  I can find both the Appleton edition and a Smith, Elder and Co. (London) edition for sale on www.abeboooks.com. Both are described as first editions from 1882.  
I'll cite the Bleiler reference as a footnote.  Alas, the Donald Tuck, The Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and Fantasy merely refers to the Bleier and the Clute/Grant The Encyclopedia of Fantasy doesn't give bibliographic details.--Rtrace 13:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Where Published?

message: When one enters "vice versa" in the search bar, one is taken to the page of latin phrases, and can only reach this page, it seems, through a Google search.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.7.247.107 (talk) 11:14, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difficulty in reaching
Talk:Gautam Gambhir

message: on the eve of 26 Jan 19 , Announcement  made by Govt of India to give him Padmshri award. He will receive this award by president of India in a ceremonial function. Gaurang kapoor (talk) 08:44, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 January 2019 

message: The news sources are there with the proof that this man has some sort of controversies after entering into politics. So I think that these should be reflect in his wiki, so that whole world can know and judge him better for any sort of things. Himpat14 (talk) 14:06, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies 

message: Add the category: Category:Indian sportsperson-politicians FollyAllAgain (talk) 10:56, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done While the account now is banned I see no problems with this edit and have implemented it accordingly --Trialpears (talk) 21:23, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 August 2019 

message: Hating our players 42.105.216.82 (talk) 16:25, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  U r the top of world cup 2011 but u r the worst player  