Talk:Chaim Dov Keller

message: User:PinchasC is asserting that Rabbi's Keller's wrtings do not reflect Agudah's views. He fails to see that since Rabbi Keller is on Presidium of Agudah and writes essentially official articles for them, his wrtings therefore reflect the Agudah position. Does that need "proof" or a "citation" if the Keller's own writings say what he means and mean what he says? IZAK 22:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The following statements are unsourced:
* Rabbi Keller and his co-dean have become two of the most prominent rabbis in Chicago and in most of Illinois.
* Rabbi Keller then became one of Agudath Israel of America's "official voices.
* Rabbi Keller has become one of the strongest and most authoritative voices of non-Hasidic Lithuanian style Haredi Judaism.
* Agudath Israel's official magazine, The Jewish Observer, conveys the official stand of the organization particularly so when a member of its official governing Presidium, such as Rabbi Keller is the writer. (Also take a look at the previous sentence stating "Rabbi Keller became a member of its "Nesius" ("Presidium"), a lesser yet still prestigious appointment.")
* Thus Rabbi Keller's article: "God Centered or Rebbe/Messiah - Centered" in the June 1997 can be viewed as as serious attack on Chabad by Agudath Israel as a whole.
--PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 22:17, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This (original research) still does not make him and his co-dean the 2 most prominent rabbis. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which part is "original research"? At any rate, who do you think are the two best known yeshiva deans in Illinois? IZAK 23:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article writes Rabbis not Yeshivah deans, and what I or you think doesn't matter, it is reliable sources that do. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are yeshiva deans not rabbis? This is getting silly! And the Agudah publications are reliable sources as far as the Haredi world is concerned. IZAK 09:44, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

text: "In the top echelon" (defining this in the way that you are doing also being original research) does not make him an official voice of the group. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you saying? You are making NO sense. Do you know anything about Agudah? Would you dispute that an organization's Board of Directors, for example, is "not" it's leadership? The rabbis lead Agudah. You are stonewalling. IZAK 23:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A member of a board of directors (which this is not the case here) is not an official voice. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is on Agudah's Nesius. The Nesius and the Moetzes work together. Very few members of the Nesius or the Moetzes (choose to) go on record, and when one of them does so, like Rabbi Keller who often does do so, and speaks for them, often in writing in Agudah publications, it's an official position. It can't get more official than that as far as the Agudah movement is concerned. Aside from Lubavitch, Haredim hate propaganda and any form of publicity and they stay away from the general media as if from the devil, so that if they have one established magazine (that often becomes the basis for ArtScroll books) and a couple of newspapers that write for their own people, it's pretty significant when a prominent Agudah rabbi (like Rabbi Keller) writes articles in them, when even that is a great rarity in those publications.IZAK 09:44, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

text: This is still your original research. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't you get a little more specific. Which fact that I have stated is "original research'? IZAK 23:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no reliable sources saying that he "become one of the strongest and most authoritative voices of non-Hasidic Lithuanian style Haredi Judaism" --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: PinchasC: If Rabbi Keller IS speaking in Agudah's publications so often then he is one of their strongest voices. That is like 1+1=2. Why can't you grasp that? Rules are not just a substitute for logic and fact. IZAK 09:44, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

text: This is still your original research. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Blah, blah, blah, please explain yourself, you are being exasperating. Get off your perch and talk FACTS please and stop hurling accusations of OR against me. IZAK 23:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Blah, blah, blah,"? --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Blah, blah, blah, means you are not using arguments and each time a statement is made you just robotically utter "original research, original research, original research" when you should be responding to the argument/s and not just quoting "rules" which any robot can do. Wikipedia articles are based on its rules and all the skills of human reason and writing style. One does not exclude the other. Otherwise each sentence and paragraph on any article can be plastered with "" (as you are almost doing here, and it could even be harrasment) and even if sources are "cited" they may be lies, distortions and manipulations as you well know, so that our human brains must always be in play no matter how many or how few rules are or are not being applied. You should know this by now. It is a fine balance that every editor and certainly every admin needs to follow. IZAK 09:44, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

text: This is still your original research. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Blah, blah, blah again. Even your responses to me are cut-and-paste, why can't you discuss specific points? Do we need a third party to help us? IZAK 23:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Blah, blah, blah,"? --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Meaning, you are are still using robotic responses (in this case cutting and pasting away to your heart's delight) without facing the facts of the article that does cite sources and references. IZAK 09:44, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rabbis Keller's views

message: Chaim Dov Keller is not, to my knowledge, recognized as a halachic authority of any kind, and certainly not as a major decisor. I propose removal of the title posek from the beginning of this article. Winchester2313 (talk) 07:47, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keller a [[posek]] ? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Chaim Dov Keller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927215228/http://chareidi.shemayisrael.com/archives5760/vayeshev/aguda77.htm to http://chareidi.shemayisrael.com/archives5760/vayeshev/aguda77.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927215351/http://chareidi.shemayisrael.com/archives5763/vayigash/aguda.htm to http://chareidi.shemayisrael.com/archives5763/vayigash/aguda.htm
*Added  tag to http://jewishhistory.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2238
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926224824/http://www.tzemachdovid.org/gedolim/jo/tworld/rsorotzkin.html to http://www.tzemachdovid.org/gedolim/jo/tworld/rsorotzkin.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:55, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chaim Dov Keller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605072712/http://www.tzemachdovid.org/gedolim/jo/tworld/rbloch.html to http://www.tzemachdovid.org/gedolim/jo/tworld/rbloch.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chaim Dov Keller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930032418/http://chareidi.shemayisrael.com/archives5766/chayeisoroh/agudahchs66.htm to http://chareidi.shemayisrael.com/archives5766/chayeisoroh/agudahchs66.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified