Talk:Bliss (image)

message: Hello.  Sonoma is in Sonoma County not Napa County.  Napa Valley is located in Napa County. Check your article to correct. thx!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.25.207.27 (talk) 23:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Nothing to do. Article makes no such claim. Photographers are free to wander away from their original goal, location-wise and subject-wise. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 23:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: A user on Flickr took an updated picture seen here, and says the 2006 picture on Wikipedia "was taken from the wrong location, approximately 350' farther Northeast, it is of the correct hill, but it is shot in the wrong direction." -- GreenC 17:00, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 picture 

message: There is the story around that the photographer had to deliver the photo in person because its value was too high so that fedex et. al. refused to transport is. Does anyone know the real price?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.61.9.75 (talk) 11:34, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the interview (and now in the article) he cannot disclose the exact amount since he signed a confidentiality agreement. Another paper reported that it was in "the low six figures", and I've got that in there now, too. Daniel Case (talk) 17:55, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  price 

message: Apparently, someone have not seen the word "not" in WP:NOTLINKFARM. This article has too many links, sources and off-topic contents for so little actual contents.
Maybe it is best to merge this article instead of padding it with external links and redundant citations. Fleet Command (talk) 22:29, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with that characterization, and the deletion of links, including the entire External Links section. I won't edit war over it but will start an RfC to bring in outside opinion. As for "merging this article" that would have little support from me for one. -- GreenC 01:57, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you might want to say in your RFC that I don't think I deleted anything. Google Maps link appear at the top right of the article. (Only it is more neutral: There are more services.) The Flickr link appears in citations already. The YouTube equivalent appears in every one of the citations. (Well, not every one; a lot.) I just cleaned up the messy repetition. Fleet Command (talk) 02:06, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You can say it yourself. The external links sections are not the same as geocoords, it's a courtesy to users who may not know about or use the geocoords feature. And the YouTube link is not anywhere else in the article .. the same content is in some of the citations but most readers will never click through and read citations, again the EL is a courtesy to users to highlight significant content. Same with the Flickr image, it is discussed in the article and is the sort of thing one would expect to be inlined and not buried in a citation, the template is a courtesy to users to highlight certain images, that's why the template exists. -- GreenC 02:21, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: "I won't edit war over it". Well, I am at a loss as to what this is. (Not really; I am pretty sure it is edit warring.) Fleet Command (talk) 21:43, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive linking 

message: This RfC is flawed. The nominator failed to mention that these link are already part of the citations: The Google Map link appears at the top of the article; the YouTube Video and the Flickr image virtually appear in 50% of citations. It tricks people who want the content but not the grotesque look of the article to answer "yes". This RFC is basically a ballot that conflicts with WP:ELLAYOUT. Policies and guidelines represent the consensus of the majority and polling does not override a consensus. 188.245.53.140 (talk) 08:18, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Flawed RfC

message: *  1. Yes - The  template lists three criteria for inclusion, which this picture meets. #3 says "readers will expect this type of media in the article" since the picture is discussed directly in the article.2. Yes - Providing external links is a courtesy to readers and even if some of the content is duplicated in reference sources, which not all of it is. Two links is hardly a "link farm". -- GreenC 06:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Fleet Command (talk) 12:42, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The "See also" section was created to hold the portal bar but since there are no See also links it creates a lot of white space so I moved the portal bar down and moved one of the images up to collapse the whitespace until someone adds see also links. -- GreenC 15:29, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: And now you've made the problem vertical instead of horizontal; template collides with references, making a scene of it. Why don't you move it way up? Why noy move the whole section under history? Fleet Command (talk) 23:00, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: How is it now? Restored the 'see also' section and used Template:Clear to force the section header underneath everything before it. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:46, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Remains no different from the screenshot that I posted. The correct response to a problem is solving it, not haggling about it. Fleet Command (talk) 11:04, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout problem 

message: choosing Fuji film for its brilliant colors.
I think the photographer wanted to note that he used Fujifilm's Velvia, because it is a landscape film and boosts some colours to a level above reality, which is known among us photographers. And sometimes it's just called "the Fuji". But now it sounds like an ad for Fujifilm, which states that they offer film with brilliant (= good) colours and others don't. Like if he was paid for it. --92.76.140.58 (talk) 14:43, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info. I made some changes based on your recommendation and what it says in Velvia. -- GreenC 15:04, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fujifilm's brilliant colours 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bliss (image). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111201181845/http://www.hanne-mugaas.com/artblog/2007/04/paris_was_yesterday.html to http://www.hanne-mugaas.com/artblog/2007/04/paris_was_yesterday.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120623084314/http://www.300m3.com/sidor/sidor_2008/2008_8.html to http://www.300m3.com/sidor/sidor_2008/2008_8.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have seen examples of Bliss in popular culture such as in Paper Toss, two of the levels contain this as a desktop picture. YuriGagrin12 (talk) 17:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we add a In popular culture section? 

message: Hey!  Sorry if this is the wrong place to put this. I don't edit Wikipedia but someone who does can do something with it.  There's a reddit page that has another similar picture of higher quality than the ones up. https://www.reddit.com/r/mildlyinteresting/comments/5eiyjp/i_took_a_photo_in_the_same_spot_where_the_windows/
: We need the picture to be freely licensed for reuse and modification; creative commons attribution or attribution share-alike are the most common licenses. --GRuban (talk) 03:00, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture in same spot 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:07, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: I propose to add this page to Bahasa Melayu Azran457 (talk) 13:07, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add new language: Bahasa Melayu