Talk:Heartbeat City

message: i could SWEAR i hear mutt lange on backing vocals on this album, though i don't remember seeing him mentioned in the credits.
Gringo300 14:22, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

message: What is the car on the cover? I think it may be a Plymouth Duster. --unsigned comment by 67.188.172.165 22:11, July 15 2006 (UTC)
:It is a 1970 or 1971 Plymouth Duster 340. --Fantailfan 04:39, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Cover

message: Please do not change the article again without discussing it on the album discussion page. The standard format should be used unless there is a compelling reason to change it. Since nothing has been added to the discussion page to justify the deviation, I am reverting this edit. --Fantailfan 14:09, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead vocal credit in track listing section 

message: You have again changed the article without discussing it on the album discussion page. The standard format should be used unless there is a compelling reason to change it. Since nothing has been added to the discussion page to justify the deviation, I am reverting this edit again and requesting semi-protection. --Fantailfan 20:15, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead vocal credit in track listing section 

message: On the page it says that due to this, Mutt was unable to work on the Hysteria album, yet on the Mutt Lange page and the page for Hysteria it says he produced it.
Probably around the time of Ric Allen's accident - perhaps some clarification?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.28.240.250 (talk) 20:17, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mutt Lange confusion 

message: I'm about to remove the following statement:
The album was a return to form for the band, coming after their darker albums Panorama and Shake It Up.
I'll agree that Panorama is delightfully dark, with its dissonance, antisocial lyrics, mechanical arrangements, and the challenging polyrhythm of "Touch and Go" . . .  but Shake It Up is about as dark as a bowl of Lucky Charms.  I'd love to talk to the person who wrote that.  What were you thinking?  In what way is this album "dark"?  The background of the album cover?  Hell, if you think SIU is dark, what must you think of the first album?  
Anyway, since I can't figure out how to remove SIU and have the sentence still make sense (Panorama came first, then SIU, then Heartbeat City), I'm gonna have to delete it.  Sorry.
Then, I guess I better head on over to the Shake It Up article.  
--63.25.23.231 (talk) 07:39, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The reviews by Rolling Stone  and Robert Christgau  both note the darkness of Shake It Up as a whole  but not the title track, which may be in part the attribution you're seeking. I'm not familiar with the album itself, so have no opinion on the matter, but it seems to be opinion. I have changed the comment you used when hiding the text to make it more neutral for future editors. Cheers!   Salamurai (talk) 20:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dark" Shake It Up? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Heartbeat City. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930232023/http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/thecars/albums/album/93183/review/5942470/heartbeat_city to http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/thecars/albums/album/93183/review/5942470/heartbeat_city
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090525171645/http://www.peterphillips.com:80/75a.htm to http://www.peterphillips.com/75a.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Don't have time to attack it at the moment, but this page is a real mess. Horrible syntax flow and wording, weird info placement (the "background" section consists of nothing of the sort). and just too much general sloppy vagueness. Will try to fix it sometime soon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.74.80 (talk) 07:37, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ugh