lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Colors of the day in Thailand

message: Can someone help me expand this article? I think it is a good topic for wikipedia.
I don't know the first thing about this topic, but the chart's colors do not match the info in the links. 69.244.44.135 (talk) 20:46, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page should be moved to Thailand Color of the day. Other Suggestion/Comments welcome. --Anbu121 (talk me) 16:05, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Move 

message: http://horoscope.mthai.com/horoscope-highlight/9017.html --โจ : แฟนท่าเรือ : เกรียนที่หน้าตาไม่ดีแห่งไร้สาระนุกรม : พูดคุยกับควายตัวนี้ได้ที่นี่ 08:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  source
Talk:Group homomorphism

message: Let me know how I can tweak this picture so it fits with the article's style--Cronholm144 09:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess ver.2 being in the article proves that it fits the style. ^^ -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 11:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: There's a slight divergence of the definition of isomorphism between this article and group isomorphism. That article defines a g. isom. as "a bijective group homomorphism". Therefore it would seem that there's no need for one to "show that its inverse is also a group homomorphism", as this article mentions in its "Types of homomorphic maps" section. -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 11:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship between bijection and isomorphism

message: It would be useful to define the relation "H is homorphic to G" and say whether this means that there is a homomorphism from H to G or whether it means there is a homomorphism from G to H.
Tashiro (talk) 07:44, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I never heard such a term. Can you cite some source? --Shiyu Ji (talk) 20:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Define "H is homomorphic to G"

message: It seems like a lot of the content on this page is similar too, or duplicated from, the generic wiki page on Homomorphism. Should we merge them? Make this a section on the Homomorphism page?
At the very least we should probably link to the main Homomorphism article *somewhere* on this page.
Crazy2be (talk) 01:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I would not merge the two articles, homomorphisms are just morphisms in some category. Group homomorphisms are so much more special. But linking the articles is a good idea, go ahead! Jakob.scholbach (talk) 15:05, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Homomorphism]]? 

message: It looks strange to me that in the section Image and kernel, the multiplication on G is denoted as \circ, which usually denotes composition.
The other sections all use * to denote multiplication on G. --Shiyu Ji (talk) 20:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section Image and kernel: on the notation of multiplication in the group ''G''
Talk:UNSW Sunswift

message: Can one include information about green car races ?. --Nopetro 06:32, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? --Falcadore (talk) 04:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green car races 

message: Regarding my recent edit[], I am a former member of Sunswift and my role included publicity. If I have inadevertently breached WP:NPOV, then please let me know in reply to this post. -danjel (talk to me) 11:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclosure 

message: Up until march 4, the article stated 323 kg, but then someone changed it to 25% of an average car. What is the reason for changing a very recise figure to a very imprecise figure?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.191.185.114 (talk) 00:35, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the weight of the car secret? 

message: According to the Guinnes World Records websitehttp://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/fastest-solar-powered-vehicle the UNSW Sunswift no longer holds the world record for fastest solar powered vehicle sinds august 12th 2014. As for the FIA Land Speed Record: the provided source states that the "record attempt is subject to verification by the Fédération Internationale de l'Automobile (FIA)" https://www.cams.com.au/media/news/latest-news/australian-motor-sport-team-creates-electric-world-first According to the list of world records on the FIA website the record is now official.https://www.cams.com.au/media/news/latest-news/australian-motor-sport-team-creates-electric-world-first It's found in the 'List of records - Category A' (under category A group VIII Electrical engine, 500 km).
Maartenhagg (talk) 19:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated world record statement 
Talk:Continental Championship Wrestling

message: "Continental Championship Wrestling was a professional wrestling promotion based out of Knoxville, Tennessee from 1974 until 1988 and Dothan, Alabama from 1978 to 1990, managed by Ron Fuller. When Fuller sold the promotion to David Woods, it changed name to the Continental Wrestling Federation. The territory had also promoted under the previous name of Southeastern Championship Wrestling prior to 1985. Promoters Leroy McGuirk, Roy Welch, and Buddy Fuller had runs operating the territory until Lee Fields reformed it into Gulf Coast Championship Wrestling in the 1960s and 1970s."
I feel like something is either wrong or missing. Is the 1974 date correct or is the "reformed it into Gulf Coast Championship Wrestling in the 1960s and 1970s" wrong?  OR, did the original author mean that McGuirk, Welch, and Fuller ran Gulf Coast CW  AND THEN ran CCW? (To show background experience?) I'm not complaining, I am just curious about the timeline. Thanks!  Jackbox1971 (talk) 17:20, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing opening paragraph:  Timeline 
Talk:Optimates and Populares

message: The optimates and populares were the two main opposing factions in the late Roman republic. If these articles are kept separate, if they increase in size to include descriptions of the struggles between the two factions, there is bound to be duplication. To avoid this, most of the text should be taken out of the Optimates and Populares articles and put in the "Optimates and Populares" article. The two individual Optimates and Populares articles should just contain definitions of the terms and lists of prominent members, etc. There should be good links between articles. 
AWhiteC 10:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the unnecessary article here is this one, Optimates and Populares. We have an article on the Democratic Party (United States) and the Republican Party (United States), but we have no article Democrats and Republicans (United States), nor should we. The individual articles should discuss the parties in depth, and coverage of the struggles between the two factions should be discussed where it's appropriate, e.g. Roman Republic#History. —Angr 13:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I disagree.  I created this article as part of WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles; it was listed because Encyclopedia Britannica has an article by this title.  I realize that doesn't mean we need to have an article by the same title, so I did some research and discovered that the two factions are discussed together in every scholarly work I found.  Therefore, I deduce that readers may search or browse the phrase "Optimates and Populares" and it is at least useful as a stub. Spike Wilbury ♫ talk 14:46, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Then how about a redirect to Roman Republic#Evolution of Republican government? —Angr 15:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds good! --Spike Wilbury ♫ talk 15:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I also disagree. The idealogical/political struggle betweeen Optimates and Populares was the big issue of the late Roman republic. If it is not documented here, where is it to be documented? Roman Republic#Evolution of Republican government is not specific enough, in my opinion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by AWhiteC (talk • contribs) 21:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It can be documented at Roman Republic#History, and if that section gets too long, a new article History of the Roman Republic (currently a redirect) can be started. It's better to keep these things in context. —Angr 06:42, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening shot
Talk:Satellite 5

message: I want to correct the first paragraph of this, but I'm not sure what the original editor intended.  The line: "Satellite 5 though is not a satellite, but more of a long orbiting space station..." doesn't make sense to me.
A satellite is merely something that is in orbit around something else.  Satellite 5 is a space station that orbits the Earth, therefore -- in my view -- it qualifies as a satellite.
From the wikipedia page on Satellites: "In the context of spaceflight, satellites are objects which have been placed into orbit by human endeavor. They are sometimes called artificial satellites to distinguish them from natural satellites such as the Moon."
Did the original author mean to say: "Satellite 5 though is not just a communications satellite..." or is there some confusion as to what the term "satellite" refers to?
amccaf1 05:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Campaignbox Iraq War terrorism

message: Or we should remove the numbers and give every bombing a name in the box, or we should put the numbers in brackets if other names exist. Now it is just a mess: giving numbers to certain bombings while bombings in the same city are mentioned without a number. Sijo Ripa 10:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: very complicated situation, I don't know how to rename a string of bombings, example 18 April 2007 Baghdad bombings. For the things to be worse, there were hundreds of bombings in Baghdad, so 10th Baghdad is pretty inaccurate. Maybe to put the dates with places? --TheFEARgod (Ч) 10:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree that there were many more and that the numbering is becoming absurd. A date would be better, but I fear that the names in the box will become quite long. Sijo Ripa 11:07, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Box names

message: I have boldly converted the template to  style since there are FAR too many attacks for the Campaignbox style to be useful. Even with  it occupies a good 3 lines (of links). It used to be 13 lines (of links). -- Cat chi? 11:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We can now better format this. Probably by year. Any objections to separate the list (with 's or ----'s) by year? -- Cat chi? 11:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking the same about the size of the campbox. Divide it as you wish we can later experiment with other. --TheFEARgod (Ч) 13:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that a change was necessary, but I think that the layout of the current version could be improved.Sijo Ripa 20:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. I am open to suggestions. I would recommend an extensive discussion here before making changes to the template itself. -- Cat chi? 15:24, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I prefer the current layout over the earlier "br"-divided one. I also like the idea of having the dates in a left collumn. (Good job!) But it is necessary to have everything on a blueish background? I think it looks prettier when the attacks themselves are on a white background, but I need to see it before I can be sure.Sijo Ripa 16:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I like the design, keep it, but still I would like to see the template on the left (see Vietnam War, size doesn't matter) --TheFEARgod (Ч) 00:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformat 

message: This box's design is quite interesting and caught my eye immediately. However, I feel it is a bit difficult to read and should be ordered by location, thereby reducing the number of times a city's name must be repeated. --86.209.190.178 (talk) 08:50, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordered by location? 

message: the war is said to be formally concluded on Aug. 31  -- bombings wont stop. so time time to change the title of the template box?Lihaas (talk) 07:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "during Iraq War"
Talk:Greater coucal

message: The Bird in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.110.149.233 (talk) 23:48, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I saw, on two consecutive days, a bird fly to the approximate centre of my pond, hover briefly then swoop to the water, touching and breaking the surface, before flying away.
The bird fits the description of a greater coucal, but I cannot find an example of this behaviour anywhere. So what are these birds doing, and are they greater coucals?
The pond is approximately 20m x 40m and was stocked with a few hundred tilapia fingerlings a week ago. There is as yet not much vegetative cover and the centre is completely devoid of cover. There are several adult frogs and some water insects. AdamNealis (talk) 09:29, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greater Coucal behaviour over water
Talk:Richard Mulcahy

message: I have inserted Mulcahy's name in Irish, however I am unsure if that is the correct spelling. Much obliged to anyone who can verify if its the correct spelling. Cliste 00:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ainm as Gaeilge?

message: User:BrownHairedGirl changed the succession boxes as an example for a previous discussion. This discussion was inconclusive and no other TD's succession boxes were changed to this format, so I have changed it back to the conventional usage per all other TDs. Snappy (talk) 19:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: So you agree that the edit summary "added template" is misleading, and in no way explained your edit? --Domer48'fenian' 16:18, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I did add a template, I was adding the same template to everyone in it, on adding it to this article, I took the opportunity to tidy up the successions boxes, to bring back into line with the current standard for all other TDs, I neglected to mention this part in my edit summary, it was not intentionally misleading. Snappy (talk) 18:14, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I did no say it was intentionally misleading, only that it did not reflect the edit that was made. This is supported by both you first and second post. Thanks, --Domer48'fenian' 13:59, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succession boxes
Category talk:Lymphology

message: I disagree with the decision to close the discussion on this category. There was only a single "keep" vote opposing my nomination for deletion, so it is not fair to say that a consensus has been reached. There is still not even a Wikipedia page on Lymphology, so it seems silly to have a category for it (which still only contains one page). I disagree with the commenter that pages should be moved out of  and into this esoteric category, and I do not think this category should be populated before a consensus on its meaning and scope are reached. -RustavoTalk/Contribs 21:54, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lymphology - Nomination for discussion
Talk:Cyrano de Bergerac (Alfano)

message: The original title of the opera/play is Cyrano De Bergerac!!! :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.58.117.220 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 15 February 2009
:No it's Cyrano de Bergerac as you can see from both the English Wikipedia article: Cyrano de Bergerac (play) and the French one: Cyrano de Bergerac (Rostand). The "d" of "de" (of) is not capitalised in French. Voceditenore (talk) 17:58, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 29, 2007

message: Will somebody please replace the interval-hyphens (-) with ndashes (–)? Thanks in advance. --Ysangkok 11:35, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I've replaced them with Unicodified en dashes (–), which look the same in the edit box in by browser but view differently, rather than the HTML entity. --ais523 08:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:New Milton

message: I made the change based on this: http://www.newforest.gov.uk/media/adobe/9/r/2011_Census_ward_population_summary.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wildman2012 (talk • contribs) 17:04, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: A similar water tower appears very briefly in The New Avengers episode "Cat Amongst the Pigeons".  At approximately 34 minutes Gambits car pulls up outside and a few seconds later Gambit looks up towards the top of the tower as a train passes by.  I've been unable to find the location of this tower.  A larger version of similar design is in Southall. K9ine (talk) 23:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water Tower 
Talk:Beatle boot

message: Aren't fictional wearers the crew of the Enterprise NCC 1701 in Star Trek classic (TOS)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.123.90.94 (talk) 05:20, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

message: From what I have gathered over the years, reading innumerable interviews, books and articles and from televised interviews with the various Beatles, it just seems more likely that the very dapper and style-conscious Brian Epstein would have outfitted his "boys" with footwear like that.  Also he is likely to be the only one in their organization that could finance four pairs of custom-made boots.  In 1961 I can't imagine any of the four Beatles having that kind of money, or being willing to part with on a style so effeminate compared to their rowdy, leather rocker image they gravitated to on their own.  In any case, it wasn't until some time after the group accepted Epstein's management offer in 1962 that he was able to impose on them any semblance of a dress code. 1961 seems a very unlikely date both for matters of taste in clothes and finances.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.89.159.105 (talk) 00:33, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Likely Epstein 
Talk:Arabia Through the Looking Glass

message: I have added a synopsis for this book.  11:57, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the source and relevant external links for this article Ivankinsman 09:13, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 29 April 2007

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.fantasticfiction.co.uk/r/jonathan-raban/arabia.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Yoenit (talk) 11:49, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note that the rest of the plot summary does not appear to be a copy vio but a review of the book, which is inappropiate given our WP:NPOV policy. I have therefore removed it as well. Yoenit (talk) 11:49, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Helen Menken

message: I have removed John Swanson's name from the "Spouse" line in this article's infobox for three reasons. 1) He is not mentioned in the "Personal life" section. 2) No citation is given to show a source for the marriage and divorce information. 3) This article, published in a 1935 newspaper, says, "She has been twice married, first to Humphrey Bogart .... A few years ago, she married Henry Templeton Smith ..." If she had been married to Swanson for four years, the journalist probably would have included that information in the article.
If someone has a reliable source to support the marriage to Swanson, it can, of course, be restored to the article. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:33, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of John Swanson from "Spouse" line in infobox
Talk:City of Geraldton

message: I would like to suggest that you add the current government: The city of greater geraldton, so it is easier to find.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.157.154 (talk) 10:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Talk:RAF Balloon Command

message: I have been told that the First Squadron of the RAF (then part of the Army) was created in WW I exclusively for balloons.  I have not yet found corroboration. - Kittybrewster  (talk) 12:09, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Squadron 1

message: The Balloon Command insignia used on this page is clearly a poor photoshop, and is taken directly from an unofficial website which would appear to have created it: www.rafweb.org/Cmd_H3.htm. It may resemble the original insignia, but I can find no corroboration, and I highly doubt the RAF would have used an image of a Montgolfier balloon in this way. As a result, I intend to remove the insignia pending further references. - the1james  16:36, 28 Mary 2014 (UTC)
:Although not an official website rafweb is a well regarded site and unlikely to make a mistake like show the wrong badge. A quick google search indicates that others think this is the correct badge for Balloon Command, including the RAF at http://www.raf.mod.uk/rafcms/mediafiles/0000CE89_1143_EC82_2EEE74A84008C4B4.pdf perhaps you should consider putting it back. MilborneOne (talk) 17:51, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I also hold rafweb in high regard. I have restored the badge until there is a consensus to replace it with something else. Dormskirk (talk) 21:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Insignia
Talk:The Soul of a New Machine

message: The book cover mentions a forthcoming 'movie' - what became of that, or was it just hype ?
MikeW
: They were talking about it for a while. I remember because I was in seventh grade (I'm Tom West's daughter) and the idea of having someone play your dad in a MOVIE was an amazing thing to think about, but for one reason or another the project was shelved. Jessamyn (talk) 15:43, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: movie?

message: Removed this:
One side effect of the book was to popularize throughout the computer world the term canard, which had been in-house slang at Data General, with the meaning "mistaken and confused belief".
In fact, canard is an English word dating to the mid-19th century. It comes from the French 'canard' meaning hoax. Saagpaneer (talk) 16:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's got a computer slang meaning as well which is cited in the book and appropriate. I'll add a page number cite for it. Jessamyn (talk) 18:17, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: canard

message: We spent a fair amount of time on this book during my MBA.  Though I found the read fascinating on its own merits (hats off to your dad, Jess), perhaps the most poignant subtext was how the story is used both as a "how-to-motivate-employees" leadership tutorial **AND** as "beware-of-coercive-management" cautionary material for labor-unions.  Maybe we could work some of this double-sided interpretation, which (I would say from my read) is emphasized within the text? Sskoog (talk) 17:59, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: exploitation?

message: Wasn't this about the compromises made for backward compatibility, not "having it completed more quickly"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:5B70:26C0:0:0:0:18 (talk) 04:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bag on the side...