lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:First Intifada

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved   (t · c) buidhe 06:55, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: First Intifada →  – Rename per WP:CONCISE there have been multiple events named Intifada in the Arab World over the past century. Specifically, the first events named Intifada were the 1952 Egyptian revolution and parallel Iraqi Intifada (1952). Later those were followed by Bahraini March Intifada in 1960s, the Sahrawi Zemla Intifada in 1970s, LEbanese February 6 Intifada in early 1980s (all being essentially "First Intifada"s) and only later in 1987 was the first Palestinian Intifada. Some sources which utilize the term "First Intifada" deal specifically with the Israeli-Palestinian event in retrospective and hence drop "Palestinian" from the term, while during the event itself it was rather branded "the Palestinian Intifada", the the "87 Intifada" - same as sources dealing with World War I referred to it as "the World War". It is certainly not the "First Intifada", but rather only in the Palestinian context. GreyShark (dibra) 09:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 May 2021 

message: Please change "The impact on the Israeli services sector, including the important Israeli tourist industry, was notably negative." to "While filled with suffering and terror, the First Intifada became beneficial to the Palestinians. It solidified a clear and focused national consciousness for Palestine and the peoples need for statehood. The First Intifada brought a negative light to Israel on the world stage as many witnessed the horrors the Israeli Forces were capable of in trying to maintain their political legitimacy. The conflict also cost Israel hundreds of millions of dollars in lost tourism and imports."
 
Pierpaoli, Paul G., Jr. "Intifada, First." The Encyclopedia of the Arab-Israeli Conflict: A 
Political, Social, and Military History, edited by Spencer C. Tucker and Priscilla Roberts, vol. 2, ABC-CLIO, 2008, pp. 472-474. Gale eBooks. Accessed 2022.
 Stitch2016 (talk) 04:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: This language seems to violate WP:NPOV. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:25, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 December 2022 

message: In the introduction it is written "an Israeli Defense Forces' (IDF) truck collided with a civilian car, killing four Palestinian workers", but I don't see any reference that says that the truck was indeed one of the IDF. If it was an IDF's truck indeed, a reference saying so is, in my opinion, much needed. Otherwise, it would be good to edit this part out. Thank you Nausicaasbel (talk) 14:03, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to Israeli truck driver per sources. Selfstudier (talk) 11:27, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casus belli
Talk:Road traffic safety

message: Significations of road safety 106.211.111.131 (talk) 06:22, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Road safety 

message: The role of citizens in preventing the road accidents 103.149.16.186 (talk) 14:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social 

message: The use of deaths per billion vehicle kilometers as an indicator is not the usual -worldwide- indicator, WHO (World Health Organization) publishes the data in relation to 100.000 persons see Global status report on road safety 2018. 
it is suggested to move the article to the common -worldwide- indicator. Milton (talk) 09:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indicators
Talk:List of Chinese Americans

message: The entry for An Rong Xu recently added is not well sourced. There is no Wikipedia page for Xu, the sources seem to be a pointer to article which has a photo bylined by Xu, and to a page of his photographs. However a little searching persuades me that Xu might be a notable Chinese-American worthy of a Wikipedia page. So maybe, instead of flagging that entry, somebody can work on creating such a page?  would this be something you would work on? M.boli (talk) 21:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, if one looks carefully (deep) within the non-New York Times source cited, there is an indication of Xu being Chinese American. The New York Times source quotes Xu as the photographer, which in itself lends an element of notability. I believe Xu is highly notable for photography work as a Chinese American, and I agree with you that it is a shame that there is not yet a separate Wikipedia article for Xu. Unfortunately, I do not have the time to put a notable article together yet at the moment. But if someone could just start a stub article for now, that would be helpful. Best, Castncoot (talk) 15:46, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  An Rong Xu recently added 

message: Can we get some photos? Alexysun (talk) 05:45, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we get some photos?
Talk:Jewry Wall

message: at Leicester the History section skims past Roman Leicester. I am adding this text there, but a brief synopsis of what has been recovered from Roman Leicester might make a good paragraph there. Wetman 23:07, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm about to revert the undiscussed merger by Rushton2010 of Jewry Wall with Jewry Wall Museum. The two entities are quite distinct, and deserve separate articles. The museum is far more than a "museum of the ruin": it's a museum of Leicester's pre-modern archaeology (prehistoric to medieval), which happens to be located next to the ruin, and is an important cultural institution in its own right. It's a shame that no-one has yet done much work to expand the museum article beyond stub status, but that's only a matter of time: the material is there. GrindtXX (talk) 12:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with Jewry Wall Museum 
Talk:Property tax

message: Given that there are so many people arguing against property tax (and claiming that it de facto means you can't actually own property), would it be worth including sections on the philosophical and political arguments for and against property taxes, and on how the taxes are enforced and defaulters punished?  (Most of the arguments against it here and elsewhere seem to presume that there is no mitigation for low incomes, and that failing to pay the tax results in the government confiscating the property.  I'm pretty sure that in the UK the former is untrue, and the latter only in the most extreme circumstances.  See e.g. https://www.rushmoor.gov.uk/article/3224/What-happens-if-you-dont-pay-your-council-tax 
Iapetus (talk) 13:26, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philosophy and enforcement 

message: Re: By the of the 19th century could that be By the end of the 19th century or By the start of the 19th century? ϢereSpielChequers 16:51, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Query

message: The article currently says "During the 1170s, William the Conqueror established an early form of land taxation"
William the Conqueror died in 1087, so something is wrong with this sentence, but I can't tell whether it's the year or the person.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:87A0:F0F:C431:E59C:A099:E350 (talk) 01:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: William the Conqueror?
Talk:Dead tree

message: I see 'dead tree format' as the equivalent of saying 'snail mail'. It's not a green or (heaven forbid) politcially correct thing. It's just techie. Secretlondon 23:26, Nov 20, 2003 (UTC)
*Fixed. Andy Mabbett 23:48, 20 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:American Dream

message: — Assignment last updated by DAgatep1 (talk) 05:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Fall 2023 HIST 401

message: This section "In America, you can tell who has achieved the American Dream if you can see how wealthy they are. Someone's status in America is shown through their wealth." seems very informal, and makes the article seem biased and unreputable. MGJohn-117 (talk) 06:55, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Informality decreasing objectivity 

message: In section See also there is the entry (the last) "new dream" this seems to be a random NGO that is not related to the article and is probably just there for SEO and credibility. I would suggest removing them for a more object and non commercial pov. Scarlett Samantha Verheul (talk) 05:52, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Question: Which NGO? ABG  (Talk/Report any mistakes here)  05:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ABG  (Talk/Report any mistakes here)  11:30, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 May 2024
Talk:Geta (emperor)

message: There appears to be a conflict between this page and that for Caracalla over whether Caracalla ordered a damnatio memoriae against Geta.  I have attempted to reconcile the two by citing the apparently-conflicting accounts, but it would be helpful if someone with access to the sources could determine whether each actually does make the representations other editors have ascribed to them. HavelockWilltravel (talk) 13:24, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Damnatio Memoriae

message: There seems to be 2 accepted birth places for Geta (Rome and Milan) (google).  Does anyone have a definitive source reagrding this?
:No. No one knows where Geta was born. The Historia Augusta is our source for both. In Geta 3.1 Milan is given, in Sev. 4.2 Rome. The discrepancy is about 1500 years old. — Bill 23:14, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace

message: "Spartianus, Caracalla, 2" is in fact a roundabout reference to the Historia Augusta; it appears to mean Chapter 2 of the Life of Caracalla, but is an old-fashioned way of referring to the Life of Geta, which has been viewed as a sort of appendage (a "chapter 2" if you will) to Caracalla. Spartianus, of course, is one of the pseudonyms of the author of the Historia Augusta. (So in fact I haven't deleted the reference at all.) — Bill 23:14, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted "reference"

message: Who the hell deified Geta?  Caracalla surely didn't. Ribbet32 (talk) 18:15, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deified emperor category 

message: I strongly oppose the convention here of numbering the Roman emperors in the manner of the presidents of the United States of America.
In our era we consider Augustus the first emperor, but for other periods (including the Roman era itself) the first of the Caesares was the dictator C. Iulius Caesar.
It should also be pointed out that the internal order of Augusti is not always obvious. On what grounds is Pupienus designated the 30th emperor and Balbinus the 31st? They were named emperors at the same time.
Moreover, to determine which individuals were real emperors becomes increasingly difficult for the emp
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.232.156.16 (talk • contribs) 12:46, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Philistines

message: We could use a revised version of the map showing Philistine cities. The names are illigible. NorieNC (talk) 21:14, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of Philistine Cities too Hard to Read 

message: This article undermines the true significance of the Philistines. From their mass trading with the Phoenecians and Egyptians to their control of the Via Maris trade route. Not only that, but their significance was very influential that the name Palestine for the region is derived from them. They were an advanced and sophisticated peoples, known for their complex naval systems like the Phoenecians. They also wer eome of the first civilizations to invent a monetary system.Nickal06 (talk) 02:31, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Via Maris and Significance 

message: I'd love to see Philistine material culture as an independent article. Temerarius (talk) 00:58, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philistine material culture
Talk:Documentary hypothesis/Archive 1

message: I am new to Wikipedia, and I'm therefore fairly unfamiliar with Wikipedia procedures, so feel free to advise me if I should be posting this comment differently.
I added a link to this article, to add the later book by Richard Elliott Friedman, which I think is a significant book for this topic. 
I have also added several sentences to the section of the article talking about modern attributions to the 4 authors, summarizing Friedman's theories regarding same, as stated in both books now included among the links. 
I was careful not to state Friedman's opinions as facts, and I also corrected the stated chronology of what he wrote and what Bloom wrote. 
I heartily commend Friedman's books to those of you who haven't read them. Even if you disagree with his conclusions, he seems to be a very careful scholar, who cites all his evidence with great specificity.
----
Friedman and Baruch Halpern are among the most accessible of Frank Cross's Harvard students. I certainly recommend Friedman myself. I've added a bit of Blenkinsopp's speculation about the reason for the redaction in this article. It has to be regarded as speculation, but it's very tempting stuff, and so much so I think it adds value to the article.
When I first touched on this article, there was a tendency to see the documentary hypothesis as sterile and barren intellectual ground from Wellhausen on. That, I knew from my reading, is the opposite of the actual situation. It will be hard to suggest the ongoing intellectual fertility without discussing some of the spectrum of ideas that surround this topic. Hopefully the new Blenkinsopp material can help accomplish that. Dwmyers 14:52, 17 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've added a link to a book and have otherwise made a relatively minor addition
Talk:Vauxhall Motors

message: why does the article says this is an English company, should it not say an American (although perhaps now French?) company's factory in England.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.79.239 (talk) 15:48, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The subject of this article is General Motors UK Limited, an English registered company</u> that trades as Vauxhall Motors. The company may be owned by a US or French company, but that doesn't change it's own nationality. -- de Facto (talk). 21:18, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Intro, second sentence: "It is a subsidiary of the German company Opel Automobile GmbH". The next sentence, first of second para, is "In March 2017 GM agreed to sell its interests". Nothing was said about GM before that, you sort of have to think through Opel to GM. Or go down farther. I am US, though, not UK. Sammy D III (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

text: No, just because a parent company is from a different country, it does not make the brand in question that nationality. 2A00:23C5:2F2F:9401:B486:36C7:C933:2928 (talk) 20:47, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about nationality

message: I propose it would be worth having a separate section for the history of the company/brand, given the number of different owners of Vauxhall over the years. This would be separate from the existing "History" section which is about the actual vehicles produced.
95.150.59.185 (talk) 11:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Glossary of climbing terms

message: I am pretty sure that "Egyptian" is the least common term for this important climbing technique (and not very appropriate), but I am not sure between Drop Knee and Knee Drop as to the most WP:COMMONNAME.  Before I change this, any views (or editors who can quantitavely assess this with google search tools)? 78.18.245.165 (talk) 18:32, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. I've never heard anyone call this move "Egyptian" or even "Knee drop", just "drop knee". Maybe it's regional or dated? Although I watch plenty of climbing content from the US and Europe and haven't heard of it before this list. I also don't think the included picture is particularly enlightening, it shows a very minor drop knee. Maybe I'll see if I can get a better picture next time I'm at the gym. RassGroots (talk) 16:20, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egyptian vs. Drop Knee vs. Knee Drop
Talk:List of biomolecules

message: I think this article needs a different title or some kind of statement of purpose. The list of all biomolecules could be taken to include every gene product of every genome, every transcript from which they derive, every intron that was spliced out, etc. I assume we don't want all that. 168... 04:58, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: As it says in the first sentence (with emphasis added): "This page aims to list articles on Wikipedia that describe particular biomolecules or types of biomolecules." If you to add an article for every gene product, sure, go ahead and list them :-/ Stewart Adcock 05:23, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page List of compounds has grown very large (64kB or so) and unwieldy, so the suggestion was made to split the page.  I have been working on this.  The initial proposal was for list of inorganic compounds and list of organic compounds, and these pages have been created, with heavy pruning of non-existent or obscure compounds, as well as generic terms like "carbohydrates".  However the organic list is still very large and likely to grow- one way to bring it down a lot would be to remove things such as large proteins and enzymes (that are not simple organic molecules) and place them here (if they're not here already).  Thus compounds like glucose and pinene would remain on both lists, but things like α-amylase and Corticotropin-releasing_hormone would only be found here. Of course there are grey areas- alanine belongs on both, but I would like just to place dipeptides here does this seem reasonable?  I'm an organic chemist but I'm pretty weak on biochemistry, so please tell me if I'm going wrong, before I spend a lot of time on this. 
The ultimate goal would be to make List of compounds into an elaborate redirect page, sending people here, or to List of organic compounds or to List of inorganic compounds.  Walkerma 00:02, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Break up of [[List of compounds]] 

message: To help visualization of these names I suggest to view through chemicalize.org, see this example Alex Allardyce (talk) 09:42, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To help visualization I suggest to view through chemicalize.org
Talk:First Things First 1964 manifesto

message: From Votes for deletion:
 consists only of the text of the manifesto. -- Khym Chanur 02:36, Nov 16, 2003 (UTC)
** Delete, source text. -- Mattworld 03:26, 16 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Nonary

message: A nonary number is divisible by six, if it is divisible by three and by two.
Well, this is true, but then it is true for any number base... ;) Morwen 09:27, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)

message: i was thinking apart from you guys and I thought that the name "nonal" would be better  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.185.0.100 (talk) 01:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NONAL! 

message: just wondering, due to Tetraphobia, can we say that East Asians use base 9 in some cases? (since 4 is omitted, so 10 is actually 9)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.246.68.208 (talk) 02:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  East Asians use Nonary?
Talk:Portfolio

message: interwiki please ! :(why there is a need for portfolio analysis for a market of abc.company?
----
Dear Daniel,
Could you provide any evidence that the link to ePortfolio is an advert? ePortfolio is not more an advert than elearning or ecommerce...
i m portfolio
The definition of a political portfolio looks silly. If it means the content of a minister's job, then what is a minister without portfolio supposed to do? --Vladko 07:01, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would like to have a sound framework (possibly including checklists) for building a product plan (so going from portfolio analysis to a new product road map for the future). Is there any good tool free available somewhere?
== Personal feelings ==
I hate this stupid word. why should we do this
Because this isn't your personal feelings. Wikipedia is designed to provide information for everyone. Just because you don't like a word, doesn't mean we shouldn't do this. McBenjamin (talk) 00:29, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  product plan framework =

message: I hate this stupid word. why should we do this
Because this isn't your personal feelings. Wikipedia is designed to provide information for everyone. Just because you don't like a word, doesn't mean we shouldn't do this. McBenjamin (talk) 00:29, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal feelings 

message: With all of these definitions, none is suitable for describing a model's portfolio of their images.  Either Artist's portfolio should be expanded to include modeling, or a separate article made for it, nicht wahr / n'est pas? --Eliyahu S Talk 05:58, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing definition - Modeling portfolio 

message: This entry uses the word "portfolio" in defining what an IT Portfolio is. Chafe66 (talk) 20:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular Definition: IT Portfolio 

message: Dee Doyle has written the word portfolio wrong. She has written the letter a on the end of the word.Angel2022fly (talk) 17:35, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dee Doyle has written the word portfolio wrong.
Talk:Social network analysis

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Networks in Political Science and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 22:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Networks in Political Science" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Death camp

message: Extermination camp unprotected by ? ; Death camp unprotected by Infrogmation 20:57, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  from Wikipedia:protected page 

message: (originally)
protected at Lir's request, "move war" with Wik. Hey, I thought we were going to discuss this first? --Uncle Ed 16:50, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, our policy on precision does suggest precision where necessary to disambiguate from some other meaning. Perhaps, Wik, you could list some death camps that were not extermination camps? Martin 23:20, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: It can be used for anything, see for example . It is a term that belongs in a dictionary at best, for any camp where people are killed. --Wik 23:28, Nov 21, 2003 (UTC)
I don't like either name: they both give me the creeps. But what I dislike even more is a "fight to the death" over camps where innocent people were slaughtered like sheep. So let's leave it alone for a couple days... --Uncle Ed 18:35, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  from talk:Extermination camp 

message: ::Death camps (also known as extermination camps or death factories; de: Vernichtungslager) were a kind of concentration camp used up by Nazi Germany, during World War II, for the killing of Jews (and other groups) which were considered undesirable by the ruling government. This was part of the Holocaust; the systematic murder of all Jews was termed the "final solution" (Endlösung) in Germany. 
The above was written by Lir when he moved the article. It is a slight rewriting of the introduction. Preserving here as Lir is unable to access deleted pages. Martin 22:55, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lir's introduction 

message: I'm protecting this page. Wik, please stop reverting.
From now on, everyone propose your changes in "talk", and when a consensus is reached -- or even a fairly good idea emerges -- a sysop will make the change. --Uncle Ed 22:43, 24 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit War