Talk:Violin Concerto (Beethoven)

message: :"The solo violin's entrance, after the original statement of the first theme, is considered to be the most tricky to pull off out of all concerti."
Excluding the Mendelssohn, Mozart #5 and countless more modern works. Changing to "one of the most". --Lambyuk 17:34, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I restored the trivia section that was removed last May.  I don't see why it should be removed.  User:Alexandergreenb, 18 June, 2009, 15:37 EST.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandergreenb (talk • contribs) 19:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Why is there a redirect from Beethoven's Piano Concerto No. 6? Surely anyone looking for a page on piano concerto no. 6 would not mistake it for the violin concerto.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.31.82.80 (talk) 13:20, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Beethoven arranged this work for piano and orchestra with a different cadenza which got published as Op. 61a.  For a bit there was a separate stub for that work to which No. 6 redirected.  That stub was merged into this article and the redirect went along with it.  I don't think this is a big deal.DavidRF (talk) 13:57, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?

message: Does anyone if the cadenza used by Isaac Stern was written by someone else or was it his own creation?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.164.76.2 (talk) 05:30, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Stern's Cadenza

message: I have the idea that this was Beethoven's only violin concerto.  Is that so?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.5.185.213 (talk) 20:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beethoven's Only Violin Concerto? 

message: The book currently cited in the article is from 1998. Somehow I got into a Google Books 1994 book in which there was a chapter starting on p. 198 by Robert Philip, "Traditional Habits of Performance in Early Twentieth Century Recordings of Beethoven." I did not find in that chapter anything I wanted to cite. To add to my confusion, it now turns out that the 1998 book is a Google Book. In that, I did not find "Robert Philip" or "early twentieth century".  So for now, I'm leaving the Stowell reference as it had been, with him as sole author. Marlindale (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah-ha! Yes, sound like different books. But thank you for your attention to detail. :) The Land (talk) 18:06, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stowell book(s) 

message: Looking at the articles french horn and natural horn, it seems that in 1806 the natural horn was more likely to have been used, so
I plan to revise accordingly. If someone finds more definite information it would be appreciated. Marlindale (talk) 03:08, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural or French horn? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Violin Concerto (Beethoven). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20151124191004/http://www.warnerclassics.com/shop/381582,0825646433636/alexandre-da-costa-violin-concerto-symphony-no-7 to http://www.warnerclassics.com/shop/381582,0825646433636/alexandre-da-costa-violin-concerto-symphony-no-7
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified