Talk:Carcharodontosauridae

message: Apparently it's an actual thing: German Wikipedia article. Maybe we can fix it? Subterrane 08:33, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

message: This article doesn't include anything about this, which is very important. 122.109.250.74 (talk) 06:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What makes a Carcharodontosaurid? 

message: For some reason the temporal range of Carcharodontosauridae extinction was changed from 70mya to 91mya. Despite the fact there were appropriate sources stating Campanian-Maastrichtian records of this family. I think someone has a problem with updated information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.50.48.2 (talk) 01:29, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem..... 

message: "However, past the Turonian (lol), there seem to be no signs of the presence of these animals anywhere on the world."
Notice the 'lol', but sccoriding to the history it has been removed. But it hasnt. So i decided to, one problem. When i edit the page the'lol' aint there. ??????? Spinodontosaurus (talk) 16:40, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see the problem too.  It's probably a lag in page cache somewhere along the line.  So, I edited that section to clear out the cobwebs (merged the two paragraphs; no problem with reversing this, as it was a test mostly), and it looks like it's gone now. J. Spencer (talk) 16:49, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  umm 

message: I have prove that they defiantly survived till 67mya
* http://carnivoraforum.com/topic/9703198/5/#new
* http://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/rbg/login
* http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195667112001176
* http://dml.cmnh.org/2012Jul/msg00120.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.105.47 (talk) 08:05, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Campanian–Maastrichtian is by definition 70 Ma ago, not 67. This can be added with a valid citation of the paper. MMartyniuk (talk) 11:54, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maastrichtian Carcharodontosaurids 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Carcharodontosauridae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222053906/http://rbg.sbgeo.org.br/index.php/rbg/article/view/1622 to http://rbg.sbgeo.org.br/index.php/rbg/article/view/1622
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I noticed earlier that you undid an edit by an IP user on the etymology in the article lede. The etymology in the first place seems a bit unnecessary, however, as the name Carcharodontosauridae derives from Carcharodontosaurus, the archetypal genus, and a complete etymology is shown on that page. Hence, I think it would be possible to just axe the etymology portion in the title. Hdjensofjfnen (tap) 18:36, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems reasonable. Nick Levine (talk) 18:45, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology in the article lede 

message: Giganotosaurus, Mapusaurus, Carcharodontosaurus, and Tyrannotitan all rivaled or exceeded Tyrannosaurus in size. <-- Isn't the weight for the largest T-Rex specimens estimated at 8-9 tons? And Tyrannotitan is not as large as the others from what I've read.HammerFilmFan (talk) 03:27, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  size statement in the lede 

message: Pete Makovicky papers:
Meraxes gigas - https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/958071
Siats meekerorum - https://news.ncsu.edu/2013/11/dinosaur-discovery/ 
HammerFilmFan (talk) 13:54, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  updates for N.America