lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Coyote

message: Given that grey wolves and coyotes only spit around 50000 years ago, and according to some studies, North American grey wolves are more related to coyotes than they are to Eurasian grey wolves, should the coyote just be considered a subspecies of grey wolf? 2001:1970:4885:CC00:0:0:0:F1E0 (talk) 01:39, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grey wolf subspecies? 

message: Should there be a subcategory for the coyote's relationship with the American badger given the frequent relationship between the two animals when hunting prey? Traptor12 (talk) 23:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with the American badger 

message: Coyote is spelled the same in English and Spanish. It is derived from Nahuatl (Aztec). My question is why is the first syllable in English pronounced "Ki" and not "Co" as in the Spanish. Is "Co" frequently pronounced "Ki" in English? -- GreenC 04:08, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation  

message: I removed this sentence (which does not have a citation):
: The earliest written reference to the species comes from the naturalist Francisco Hernández's Plantas y Animales de la Nueva España (1651), where it is described as a "Spanish fox" or "jackal". 
Coyotes are described a century earlier in the Florentine Codex (see ), and possibly earlier than that. Jcitawy (talk) 10:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earliest written reference 

message: All of the range maps have Vancouver Island as part of the range of coyotes. There are no coyotes on Vancouver Island. 
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/sports-recreation-arts-and-culture/outdoor-recreation/fishing-and-hunting/hunting/trapping/coyote.pdf 2001:569:519E:EF00:F16F:72C4:E01D:9FF4 (talk) 00:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No coyotes on Vancouver Island
Talk:Marv Goldberg

message: I've reverted the latest changes made by the avowed subject of this page, because most of them turn good into bad grammar. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 19:21, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: I've moved this template from the article: . It's new, and so far only appears on this page.  I find it objectionable in general, and in any case inappropriate for an article (rather than a Talk page).  Wikipedia explicitly (Wikipedia:No original research) denies that personal experience or knowledge be relied upon, much less that they trump other editing. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 10:17, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced this newly-minted template with  which is rather more weathered (and hopefully more NPOV). HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 14:26, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that template works better. JeremyMcCracken 16:43, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia notice
Talk:Thaliacea

message: If tunicates are chordates, do they belong in the invertebrate stub category? (eg, what do we consider to constitute an invertebrate: the lack of a notocord, or the lack of a proper spine?) Collabi 01:22, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not all chordates are vertebrates.  These are an example. Jimp 04:47, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Genus "Brooksia" links to the Brooksia fungal genus, there is no page currently for the salp. 12.12.204.194 (talk) 10:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy section error
Talk:Digital reference

message: I am not certain of the notability of some of these applications; I think it would be a good practice to try to write defensible WP articles on individual ones, and only include those. It should be possible, for the professional magazines tend to have articles on the important ones. DGG 07:39, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: commercial applications

message: Note that I [ reduced] the number of tags from many to two.  With the number of tags, the article did not even appear (for me) until I scrolled down [ (diff)].  I do agree that the article needs to be expanded and have a few more sources (and thus left those tags), but I do not agree that (among other things) it is confusing, needs copyediting, is a dead-end, needs more links, etc (and thus removed those tags).  Hopefully that is agreeable?  If not, we can decide what needs to be done - and then possible do it!  :-)  --Iamunknown 22:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles tags 
Talk:Jimmy Brown

message: From WP:RfD:
* Jimmy Brown → James Brown. Jimmy Brown was an Irish terrorist, former head of the Irish People's Liberation Organisation. Since he is known as Jimmy and not James, it seems more reasonable that the page for Jimmy Brown be deleted. He can then be added to the redirect list along with the Godfather of Soul. A similar case can be found with Jim Brown, the football player. --Omphaloscope 00:44, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:A Delicate Balance (play)

message: Edited "a respectable four months" to "ran for four months," as respectable is opinion. Liontamarin 02:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

message: There may be a chronological mistake in the plot description (I haven't seen or read the play). It states that in Act one the couple learns Julia is coming home, and then Harry and Edna arrive and ask if they can stay. The Act two description begins by stating that Agnes and Julia are discussing the fact that Harry and Edna are occupying Julia’s old bedroom. Did they really know Julia was coming before Harry and Edna asked, still give them her room, and then realize it was a problem?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.166.173 (talk) 15:30, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Chronological Mistake in the Plot Description
Talk:Sigint (Metal Gear)

message: The article mentions that Sigint being the DARPA chief "can be debunked because ARPAnet deals with computer communication and DARPA is for military technology". The thing is, didn't the ARPA agency eventually become DARPA? If he was a memeber of the ARPA, I don't know why it can't be assumed that he was also part of DARPA. I don't really know if he is the same character in MGS, but that isn't enough proof to disprove it.
::ARPA cahnged its name to DARPA, simple as that! They did this as part of an international treaty they signed which said all research into weapons etc had to be in the aim of defence and not offence! The comment this relates to is one of many which should be conducted on the talk page as it is speculation and concept and is not informative. --The Pain 17:06, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ARPA/DARPA

message: This article requires a serious amount of rewriting as it has become a discussion rather than an informative article! Must be rewritten and any discussion regarding Sigints name must be carried out here! --The Pain 02:54, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Tidying and Discussion

message: Is his codename "Mr. Sigint" or just plain "Sigint"? I know the name Mr. Sigint was used on the "leaked" document, but he's only introduced as "Mr. Sigint" once in the actual game (presumably as a formality) and every subsequent instance after that, it's just Sigint. I know Naked Snake's full codename is only used once, but unlike the adjective Naked, the title Mister can be easily attached to any name (not to mention I haven't seen any other written source that attaches the Mr. to Sigint's name). So do I move the page to Mr. Sigint or not?
:It's actually SIGINT, as his codename is an acronym and referential to his occupation.  This is discribed in a radio transmission between Snake and SIGINT, though I do not remember where it is.  Idealy in a later revision it should have a link to SIGINT. --FDIS 10:10, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Mr? Sigint
Talk:Nguyễn Thị Bình

message: The link "Who was Nguyen Thi Dinh?" is about another vietnamese woman revolutionary. This article in wikipaedia is about Madame Nguyen Thi "Binh", not "Dinh" ( notes: The only difference in their names is one letter).
I keep the link as it is relevant to the topics of vietnamese women revolutionary.
Thx for pointing that out.  I can't fix it now, maybe not even till Sunday. Falphin 22:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ernesto Corripio y Ahumada

message: This namespace should be a redirect to the more complete article and more correctly entitled Ernesto Cardinal Corripio y Ahumada. --Gerald Farinas 20:48, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On April 20, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep and redirect.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ernesto Corripio Ahumada for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:56, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD
Talk:Confusion Is Sex

message: Is it possible to expand?  What more is there to say that isn't said on the Sonic Youth article?  I'm sure there's plenty of room on the Sonic Youth article for all the information in this one. Why can't this page just be redirected to that article in case someone looks it up instead of the band?  --Chammy Koala 21:02, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should be moved to Confusion is Sex. Rothorpe (talk) 17:25, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:By Any Other Name

message: The article says this is  I know it's WP:Original research and so on, but I've seen every episode of the series and all of them were much longer, like an hour (counting commercials). I don't see how Capt. Kirk would have time to fall in love with even one beautiful alien in twenty seconds, much less travel to another galaxy and back. EEng 10:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, this kind of nonsense doesn't belong on an article talk page. This section should be deleted. StarHOG (Talk) 00:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Strongly agree.  I answered the poster, though I doubted his sincerity, by assuming perhaps English was not his native language, but after reading his response I believe he is simply pulling our legs.  Delete it all.  Sir Rhosis (talk) 02:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you check my user page like I suggested? Also, given your user name I'm surprised you didn't jump at my offer of drinks, Sir Rhosis. EEng 02:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

text: We at Wikipedia have no sense of humor we are aware of. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:46, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twenty-second episode?
Talk:The Main Ingredient

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 May 2022
Talk:Galactic Barrier (Star Trek)

message: What Ever Happened To the Kelvan Empire? Have the Borg ever passed thruogh the barrier? And in Star Trek V The Final Fronter what was the creature at the end? 
Reply: omegaprimejoe2@earthlink.net Use the topic Answer W. thanks
The obvious question is, if its a band, meaning it only encircles the galaxy, why not...oh say...go over it? As Spock once said, "He shows signs of... two-dimensional thinking."  Xyzzyva 04:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: thats being snarky :p. unless it continues infinitely in either direction, making it a cylinder, it is possible to go over it. the article says encircles, not envelops. the idea of the galactic barrier seems...flawed. Carterhawk
In the Star Trek Starcharts book, they discuss the Barriers and the illustration shows it encompassing the whole galaxy in a saucer shape. Trek books aren't considered canon to the series however. Cyberia23 22:13, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Hey, over at Memory-Alpha, they call the pink band at the edge of the galaxy the Galactic Barrier and the blue one in the center the Great Barrier.  This seems to be based on a number of tiny canon references.  Does anyone want to look into this?  
(See Also: ; ) 
--BCSWowbagger 05:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the article to "Galactic Barrier" instead. Cyberia23 22:09, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  --BCSWowbagger 22:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Great vs. Galactic Barrier

message: Doesn't Chekov comment that no ship has ever returned from entering the Great Barrier in Star Trek V? If so, then it's not just fear that keeps ships out, as the article suggests. David 20:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Great Barrier
Talk:1820s (Mormonism)

message: This page has recently been moved from '1820s (Mormonism)' to '1820s in Mormonism'. I think we should keep it as '1820s (Mormonism)'. This marks it as shared between LDS and CoC and other denominations based on Joseph Smith. Also, note that we have '1950s (LDS)' to distinguish the timeline of that era in the LDS church with that of other churches. Should we rename that '1950s in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints'? I don't think that is a good idea. Jgardner 22:00, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "1820s (Mormonism)" or "1820s in Mormonism"
Talk:PH indicator

message: The table has two different entries for Methyl Red. The first line states that Methyl Red turns from red to yellow over the range of 4.4 to 6.2. The second line states that Methyl Red turns from red to green over the range 4.5 to 5.2. This does not make sense. Only one of these can be right. Ileanadu (talk) 18:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Methyl Red - Confusing 

message: There's ambiguity between electrolytes and "protolytes". The latter are usually "aqueous substances which can donate or receive protons", but I'm still not sure if that's an accurate definition of "protolytes". Since acids and bases are usually electrolytes unless specified otherwise, I changed "protolytes" to "electrolytes". In some other case, I also changed "pKa" to "pKa or pKb" to avoid ambiguity. I hope consensus will be made. Thank you ;) —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 10:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''[[Electrolyte]]s vs "Protolytes"''' 

message: I am about the to revert this by a blocked user.  The information is discussed at Talk:Phenolphthalein#Forms. --Taweetham (talk) 10:09, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you please again explain why you removed information about Phenolphthalein and Thymolphthalein from the wikitable? I had added some information about them earlier and hope that correct parts of the edits will be restored as per WP:REVRESTORE. —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 19:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color at low pH - edits by blocked user
Talk:Xian Great Mosque

message: Unfortunately, this stub is a straight life of the first paragraph from the site quoted. All I know of the Xi'An great mosque is that it was the first muslim mosque set up in imperial China, in the country's capital at the time... 22:04, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *email confirmation from www.islamicarchitecture.org recieved, Thanks NEWUSER,  --Duk 22:23, 13 May 2005 (UTC)

text: * Thank you Duk & Hajor. Yes I’m new (I've been new for a little over a decade) … I’m working on a (list of Mosques world wide) and (projects by Frank Lloyd Wright) which you can view here, I will add these to Wikipedia pages as I go along --NEWUSER 22:42, 13 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright infringement
Talk:Walter P. Kellenberg

message: Can one say this?  He was servile tool of the Diocese of Brooklyn.  Exactly the empty suit (or cassock) they wanted.  I heard this from several people in power at the time.
He held his cards so close to his vest that the "Long Island Catholic", as faithful an organ as there ever was (more so that Pravda), couldn't even get an interview with him.
68.196.10.68 (talk) 04:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: = Cold Nobody, a Coward, never stepped out
Talk:John Sutherland (author)

message: This is my first attempt to add fairly major changes to an article.
Unfortunately, I don't actually know a lot about the man beyond
one series of his books and his Guardian columns. Contributions,
corrections, etc, gratefully received.
Apparently I am supposed to cite my sources. I took the names
and ISBNs and publishers of the books off the backs of my copies
of them. They are different from the ISBNs on Amazon. I don't
know why. So I left mine in and ignored Amazon's. I took the (minimal, I know) details on his career from an issue of 
UCL News which covered his retirement and from the URLs listed
in "External References". If they should be in the talk section, or the
URL above in the main article, please rearrange to taste. 
Telsa 22:32, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was a reference to literary theory in the version I edited.
It fell out. Feel free to restore it. I don't know anything about
literary theory. 
Telsa 22:32, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Literary theory

message: "Beep. It's from Hamlet. 2B? NT2B?=???", from Reuters, on Nov. 16th, available at  was my source. I doubt that link will last long, and I don't know how to cite it.--Prosfilaes 20:36, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Text messaging

message: "He is especially noteworthy for being the only author published by the significant imprint of Oxford University Press, Oxford World's Classics during his own lifespan."
"Henry V, War Criminal? and Other Shakespeare Puzzles" by Sutherland, published in that series, was co-authored by Cedric Watts. I haven't done an exhaustive search, but it strikes me unlikely that's the only exception.--Prosfilaes 03:41, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxford World's Classics 

message: Just created/edited the controversy section. Here are some links:
Guardian Article: 
YouTube video by ZenArcher: 
YouTube video by Pipistrello: —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.109.117.236 (talk • contribs).
*Removing per WP:BLP. Abusive attack video contains the likes of "Die! You asshole!" -- plus it is hardly notable enough for an encyclopedia entry. -- Stbalbach 21:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy

message: The Talk page for the film version of the John Fowles novel “The Magus” needs your help. There is confusion whether Peter Sellers (quoted by William Goldman) or Woody Allen (quoted by John Sutherland) when asked whether he would make changes in his life if he had the opportunity to do it all over again, joked, "I would do everything exactly the same except I wouldn't see The Magus. See Talk:The Magus (film).
If you have a copy of the relevant book and can confirm or not the quote, please update The Magus (film) talk page. Thanks.Masato.harada (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Need Help with "Lives of the Novelists: A History of Fiction in 294 Lives"
Talk:Country Club Park, Los Angeles

message: I'm considering moving all of this to a Mid-City district-level entry and demoting Country Club Park to the level of a subdistrict/neighborhood.  L.A. natives with whom I've spoken always mention Los Angeles High School (which is right about at the center of the geographic area listed here as "Country Club Park") as being in Mid-City.  Of course, the city of Los Angeles doesn't exactly help clarify matters, what with its having posted Mid-City signs as far east as Hoover...
--Slightlyslack 22:39, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mid city 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bunker Hill, Los Angeles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Interested editors can also comment at Talk:Los Angeles Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 03:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Age-adjusted life expectancy

message: "For example, a population that has a raw life expectancy of 75 years may have an age-adjusted expectancy of 60 more years for a 25 year old person (surpassing the average), but only a 40-year future expectancy for a newborn"
Is that right?  Isn't the expectany for a newborn the same as the raw life expectancy?  Everybody lives to be 0, so everybody is included in the average. --Tango 23:25, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the expected age for a 25 year old should be more than the raw expectancy, but the expectancy for a newborn should be exactly the raw expectancy, by definition. It shouldn't be less. In your example, a newborn baby expects to live to 55, not lower. --Tango 16:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ==
Talk:Will Wheaton

message: For an April 2005 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Will Wheaton Junior
----
I nominated this for deletion.  I do not think this is real, and if it is it doesn't seem notable. protohiro 23:13, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article says that Will Wheaton is a jazz singer. Is this true? Where is the proof? Dick Clark says that he has "a signature voice that puts you in the mood for romance." But is he a jazz singer? His second album is called Old School Soul. To me he will always be Wesley Crusher, which is about as square as you can get, Daddy-o.–Vmavanti (talk) 00:57, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jazz singer
Talk:Bruno Faidutti

message: Please note that "Millenium" (and not Millennium) is the correct spelling for the company that published the second French edition of "Citadelles"/"Citadels". --Millsdavid 23:17, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Athletics at the 1988 Summer Olympics

message: The results need to be given in the original form (metric in this case) conversions should be given in parenthesis. Also from WP:MOS
*Use standard abbreviations when using symbols. For example, metre is m, kilogram is kg, inch is in (not " or ″), foot is ft (not ' or ′).
the conversions should read 55 ft not 55'.
Discordance 17:37, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: I have looked up the original metric results elsewhere and entered them as metres in the results table. Normally I would not remove the previous units, but as the US/Imperial units were approximate conversions, I felt that they served no real purpose and only made the page look more cluttered and complicated. Also, as this article is about results, it is the figures that matter, not the reader's ability to comprehend the scale of the measurements. Let me know if anyone has a problem with this.
Centuriono 15:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup completed
Template talk:Kosova

message: As a response to Ilir pz's edit war, I have requested protection for this page. I am also considering listing it for deletion as it uses acontroversia; Albanian name not common in English to refer to the Serbian province of Kosovo, currently under transitory United Nations administration. Regards, Asterion 16:03, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No need for deletion, it should just reflect the UNMIK documents which state that Kosovo is an entity under UN administration. Greetz, Ilir pz 09:09, 4 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Thanks SPUI for your redirect to the Kosovo template. The point is that the Kosova template should not have been created in the first place. I am for listing it for deletion if it reappears and then permanently fix the redirect (if possible). The current state of the Template:Kosovo fulfils Wikipedia NPOV policy and it's true to the facts. The territory is a province of Serbia under United Nations administration, in the Resolution 1244 (1999), adopted by the United Nations Security Council on 10 June 1999, the UN reafirm its commitment to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (and its sucessor state, the Union of Serbia and Montenegro, after the country changed its name). Regards, Asterion 06:23, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template redirection