lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Naked Gun 33 1/3: The Final Insult

message: "The opening scene in the train station was inspired by The Untouchables (1987 film)" -
I havent seen The Untouchables, but i think it was rather from The Battleship Potemkin, can someone confirm?
As the DVD commentary remarked, setting the scene on a train station steps refers to The Untouchables (1987 film), which itself referred to The Battleship Potemkin in the setting of a gun battle on stairs and the baby in a pram in peril. 119.11.19.206 (talk) 11:09, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inspirations?

message: I don't think the international titles section is noteable. Lots42 (talk) 18:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's certainly not important, so I've removed it.--Drat (Talk) 09:09, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles

message: In the spirit of fairness, I'll give everyone time to respond to this before I edit the article. The bomb was not placed in the "Best Actress" envelope, that was just the top envelope on the stack that Jane was pilfering through. The bomb was, in fact, in the "Best Picture" envelope. Deimos1313 (talk) 02:03, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bomb envelope

message: How is it that the Box Office section mentions this is the lowest grossing film in the series when it grossed $122 million while the second one only grossed $86 million?  That should be fixed. PokeHomsar (talk) 23:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the second one did not only gross $86 million. It grossed $86 million in the United States and Canada. Other countries in the world exist. Websites like Box Office Mojo and The Numbers don't have worldwide grosses for most films prior to the late 1990s.Sudiani (talk) 18:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Lowest grossing in the series”? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Page moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Judekkan (talk) 18:33, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Naked Gun 33⅓: The Final Insult →  – According to  on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Mathematics/Archive 4#Accessibility of precomposed fraction characters and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility#Text, ⅓ is not safe for screen readers. Digesting MOS:FRAC, the logical solution would be to move this article to Naked Gun 33 1/3: The Final Insult and use the following to make the title appear as "Naked Gun 33 1/3", without changing the copy-paste value: 
 
(I tested this on Draft:Ranma 1/2.)
-- Beland (talk) 06:07, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 July 2022 

message: Watchers here may be interested in the discussion at Template talk:Fraction#Unwanted plus sign. -- Beland (talk) 18:29, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  + in links to this article
Talk:Surf Ninjas

message: I removed the section on "Impact." Just because some kids tagged Surf Ninjas all over there school doesnt mean it needs a mention on Wikipedia. ShigityShank 12:28, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Impact" 

message: Excellent work on a film I'd never heard of. And yes Erik, the negative reaction section is ok, pov-wise. Alientraveller 20:47, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much; just wish there was some more background information for the film. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA pass
Talk:2001: A Space Travesty

message: :Image:2001 soace travesty.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:39, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:2001 soace travesty.jpg

message: Have you noticed that the First Line that Dix says was referencing Osama bin Laden, even though the movie was made in 2000 (before 9/11)?! 
I've just watched it for the first time, so I find it kinda weird! 
"It was one of those days you never forget. I'd arrested Osmond Bin Laden at a Lakers-Knicks game. 
Now I was back in D. C. on the QT making my way asap to the HQ when I heard the APB: 
-All available units to big joes, hostage situation, armed terrorists." 
And Of course the "Arab Terrorists" order a "plane" afterwards!! 
"I'm ordering one car and one plane. 
-One plain what? 
-One plain plane. With pilot." 
The movie is called "2001".. (9-11-2001) !! --Mando Salama (talk) 23:41, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bin Laden
Talk:The Pagemaster

message: the trivia section mentions Robert Picardo as a member of the cast, however he isn't mentioned anywhere else. Can someone add him/ remove him from either section? Jonomacdrones 19:34, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. Do you happen to have the book, so you could give a small overview of it? - Redmess 21:05, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Or words to that effect where used in ...something. I recall hearing or possibly reading it, and at the time thinking "Yeah, unless you count Wish Kid!" but nothing I could find on-line turned up the line, or something very similar to it.  Am I just imagining the line, or was it used in some of the marketing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.254.80.115 (talk) 04:49, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Macaulay Culkin Like You've Never Seen Him Before!" 

message: It's a surprisingly irrelevant bit of trivia that somehow a great number of the cast also have done something, sometime, for something Star Trek—and a couple for Transformers too! Is this so unusual to The Pagemaster that it warrants mention? Perhaps the next movie I look up will mention that "All cast members have appeared as suspects of victims on some series of Law & Order." Anyway, I'm looking forward to seeing that.
50.50.94.250 (talk) 00:36, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Trek Trivia What? 

message: This section is, in my opinion, very poorly written (as if it were from someone who has English as a second language.)  In addition, there are no references for that section.98.162.209.39 (talk) 14:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted/Extended Scenes section 

message: I tagged the article as being contradictory. Exactly as this section says on the tin. Well? Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this based on a book or not? 

message: I apparently noticed in the film's article that Hanna-Barbera is listed as one of its production companies per an AFI source. This is apparently false, as Turner Feature Animation was actually responsible for handling the animated portions of the film. Additionally, the production section also deliberately states that TFA was actually spun-off from HB, further contradicting what the source and the opening paragraph say. Are there any other sources that properly credit Turner as one of the companies involved? IceWalrus236 (talk) 05:52, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hanna-Barbera's involvement
Talk:Richie Rich (film)

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
*Support as nom. Kafziel Talk 17:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Would anyone know where the surname Pazinski comes from? The end credits only say "Gloria" and "Diana". Were the surnames referenced within the film? I had thought Gloria to be Gloria Glad, for example.
Does Diane give her full name to Cadbury at some point? If so, even if she were named Pazinski, I don't think her being Gloria's mother would necessarily mean that Gloria shares her surname, as children may have the surname of the father (perhaps a Mr. Glad) meaning that she may not be Gloria Pazinski.
Would like to know the source, if anyone happens to have a clip of the name being said (or referenced outside the film?) or if they could name the time within the film the surname Pazinski is used. Ranze (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Surnames of females
Talk:Beethoven's 4th (film)

message: It is unbelievable that Beethoven 4 redirects here and not to Beethoven's 4th symphony. Seriously, which is the more likely and relevant hit? mcoverdale (talk) 01:16, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer
Talk:Beethoven's 2nd (film)

message: I've re-added the box office figure that was removed. This is backed up by the IMDB link and provides the reader with a better understanding of the reception of the movie other than just saying the movie had a mixed response. 92.10.153.130 (talk) 05:05, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: For the past few years, numerous edits have been made stating that Regina and Floyd had been arrested at the end, but they were last seen bobbing in a raging river and never mentioned being arrested at all. These speculative edits must desist. DawgDeputy (talk) 04:53, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation edits... 

message: ...have become rampant this past week. One user has made edits that were biased and completely immaterial to the film's plot. This must be put to a halt, lest another edit war occur. DawgDeputy (talk) 18:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore, according to the edit history, the summary of this article has been without the name of the business associate who owned the lakefront house for over 11 years, and no one did anything, because they knew it was unnecessary. DawgDeputy (talk) 19:10, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on your remarks at WP:ANI, it seems that you are concerned about a fictional person being referred by their surname but not their first name. According to the Manual of Style, "After the initial mention, a person should generally be referred to by surname only". The shortcut is MOS:SURNAME. So, it seems that the other editor was correct on that point. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 20:48, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite. According to that same article, at the end of "Subsequent Use", it says: "For fictional entities, use common names." Since Taylor Devereaux was more commonly referred to as Taylor in the film, it only makes sense. DawgDeputy (talk) 23:23, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps that is what consensus will end up being. But there are definitely two sides to the story. What is certain is that this is not a matter that belongs at WP:ANI before talk page discussion, which is one of the last resorts in dispute resolution, not the first step. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 00:29, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic edits... 

message: Problematic edits by IP addresses have become rampant on this page. Requesting long-term (semi-)protection of this page to curtail this issue. DawgDeputy (talk) 12:44, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection needed
Talk:S. Sriraman

message: Late S.Sriraman, was born in OSUR VILLAGE(NEAR WANDAVASHI) TAMILNADU & NOT IN HOSUR as stated. 
From: R.Srinivasaraaghavan
*Thank you. I deleted it from the article. Shall update it as soon as I can check my source again. Tintin Talk 02:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment by  59.92.40.10
Talk:Big Momma's House

message: A portion of a sentence reads, “where he's assigned to trap a brutal bank robber and a recent prison escapee (Howard)”.  Has the FBI agent been assigned to trap a robber AND Howard, (who is an escapee), or is the character played by Howard BOTH a robber and an escapee.  
I assume that it is the latter.  In that case, the sentence portion should read, “where he's assigned to trap a brutal bank robber and recent prison escapee (Howard)”, eliminating the second “a”.  If you've seen the film, please clairfy.  Cynrin 02:32, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it's been nearly two years, with no response. Inkeeping with WP:BOLD, I'm gonna fix this now, and if people disagree they can change it back. Another day, another dollar. Scanna (talk) 03:21, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis not clear

message: I removed the preceeding section. The section is speculative, it guesses the film was "intended" for more mature audiences, and it claims the rating should not be PG-13. The section is unsual, film articles do not normally included information about Content or Ratings unless it is shown to be particularly notable. There are no sources (e.g. reviews from critics) discussing the rating, or how the rating is lower than it should be based on the content of the film. Some film articles do mention ratings but there needs to be proper references before this is added back to the article. -- 109.76.235.193 (talk) 16:00, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Content
Talk:Indian pop

message: Is there any reason this article's content doesn't match it's title? Why are we talking about Indian artists in the West, when the subject is Indian Pop, and NOT "Artists of Indian descent". I am going to start cleaning this article up starting tomorrow.
Sfacets 10:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: According to my sources, Indian techno/fusion began with Monsoon (featuring Sheila Chandra) in 1981 and the formation of Indipop Records by the band's producer, Steve Coe, shortly afterward. Sources are hard to find, one is here. -Stillwaterising (talk) 00:35, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Indipop Records

message: I am a native speaker of Hindi, and I am yet to read a single written or spoken Hindi refrenece to "Indian Pop music" as "हिन्दुस्तानी पॉप मोसीक़ी", as the article claims. For all I know, "मोसीक़ी" isn't even a Hindi word. A more accurate translation would be "हिन्दुस्तानी पॉप संगीत". I am changing ot on this account. Please post here if there are reasons not ot do so. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.41.123.44 (talk) 06:56, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious Hindi translation

message: Dheere dheere 103.127.3.157 (talk) 08:43, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dheere dheere 

message: — Assignment last updated by Devangjhabakh (talk) 21:23, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: India in Global Studies
Talk:The Final Conflict (film)

message: The title cards at the end of the film read:
"Behold the Lion of Judah! The Messiah, who came first as a child, but returns not as a child, but now as King of Kings, to rule in power and glory for ever."
This does not match any translation that I could find. It appears to be a conflation of several different passages.
"And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away."
This is a quotation of Revelation 21:4 (KJV).
I have noted the article accordingly. Ellsworth (talk) 14:10, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final title cards 

message: The title card and the promotional poster call it "The Final Conflict" alone; it's not "sometimes" called that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Parmadil (talk • contribs) 04:50, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT Omen III 

message: From the article: "Damien brutally rapes Kate Reynolds. But Damien is not deterred" 
I don't follow, and I don't think anyone else does, either. tharsaile (talk) 15:17, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot section needs help 

message: When did filming began and when did it end?31.54.250.172 (talk) 18:12, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filming
Talk:Omen IV: The Awakening

message: This film is incredibly poor quality and does not sit sequentially with the omen trilogy.  It is not considered canon with The Omen series. --Brideshead 23:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

message: "Omen IV: The Awakening is a 1991 TV-movie, straight-to-home video release..."  Seems to me that a movie can be either a TV-movie or straight-to-home video; it can't be both.  Which was it?  Fitfatfighter 05:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format of initial release 

message: i think fan is enough said, i mean i'm a fan and i think that this is a good idea.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.78.45.40 (talk) 23:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fanatics 

message: Can someone who has actually seen this film recently try to clean up the article.  It's very poorly written, and difficult to follow.  I'd do it, but I can't force myself to watch this horrible movie again!  170.145.0.100 (talk) 02:23, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary
Talk:List of conservative parties in Canada

message: For clarity, I believe that this page should be titled "Canadian right-wing political parties." My reasons are:
#"Conservative" is associated with the federal party of the same name.  Confusing!
#"Right-wing" is more widely defined.  Some will say you cannot be conservative AND socially liberal, for example.
:I'd like to go ahead with the change, but I'll wait to see if there are any suggestions!--Colle 02:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to disagree, but I think that this is the more likely name for people to look for when they are looking for the "conservative movement".  Moreover, the old PC Party, especially when being described by its Red Tory members, did not feel that right wing was a good description for their party.  - Jord 03:07, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

message: This page was just marked for updating, probably because the info on the current federal cpc stops at 2006.  It seems to me that this page is currently more of an article than a list, and there is much overlap/redundancy with the "predecessors" section in the article on the [Conservative Party of Canada]] that is rightly updated to include all the newer details absent from here, and with the specific pages of those parties/events.  I wonder if this list page should actually be updated in its current fashion, or if the "The federal conservative movement" section should be reduced to a blurb here that could precede a list of historic parties followed by the current ones.  I see the value in having an article on the history of the conservative movement in canada, but this one:Conservatism in Canada covers that pretty well, (and it also has a good party list in it). I think the party history in this list page is better left to the specific articles on the parties mentioned and this list should be more listy (Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists). Thoughts? - Slapmaster3000 (talk) 06:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That is what I expected to see when I first clicked on this page. I would like to see a small blurb about conservatism in Canada and then a list of the parties. Karl 334 Talk--Contribs 13:58, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: List?
Talk:Joe's Apartment

message: Wow this article is short, I might work on it a little, I have the DVD behind me, might pop it in and add some stuff.--Azslande 02:46, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short! 

message: I have removed the article's trivia section, because many of the facts aren't actually trivia. I have merged that material into the main article. The other trivia point removed wasn't cited, so shouldn't be there anyway. - Ta bu shi da yu 08:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been reverted. Can the one doing the revert please explain why? - Ta bu shi da yu 08:54, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section removed
Talk:Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas

message: I've heard this score, and it's quite remarkable. It sounds different coming from Harry Gregson-Williams. Should they add a section about this score in the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Surten (talk • contribs) 03:20, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Score 

message: Some idiot added useless pieces of information of the actors and actresses' roles in other movies. Is that even necessary?? 
I cleaned it up.
I mean, this article is about the movie, not people's old jobs. Serpentine17ice 08:21, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast Thing

message: Should this film be considered a sequel to the Sinbad: Beyond the Veil of Mists? The similarities are obvious. Pictureuploader (talk) 10:01, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sequel 

message: I agree. This can be expanded even more than this...
I had a short with my DVD (Cyclop's Island).
Yingpingu (talk) 17:23, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean Up 

message: How did it loose $125 million, if it only cost 80 million to make?  Dream Focus 19:49, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That would mean they spent over $100 million on marketing, which is almost twice the movie's production budget. This would be an insane amount today and even more so in 2003, so I get the feeling that something is not right with these numbers. Compare that to The Road to El Dorado, which had a budget of $95 million and grossed only $76 million, so performed even worse than Sinbad: Legend of the Seven Seas and yet it isn't even in the List of biggest box-office bombs. (Lord Gøn (talk) 16:31, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  a $125 million loss on the film, that had an 80 million dollar budget 

message: Why wasn't this film the third from Dreamworks Animation if this is one of the first films he had in mind when Dreamworks was founded? Did he have to wait until the completion of the Road to El Dorado? When that movie flopped, he decided to instead of making a seven film franchise about Sinbad to make one film. 
--71.212.110.117 (talk) 04:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  production