Talk:Sacrifice (video game)

message: The article has no mention of a boon from that mission, but as I played it through, I did get it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.78.150.81 (talk • contribs) 10:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misc 

message: This article reads like a game guide. This is one of the things that Wikipedia is not.--Drat (Talk) 12:27, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How is this like a game guide? It doesn't even cover an actual play-through.  I'm removing the tag... put it back if you have a more specific critique.Oxryly 20:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article lists all spells and all NPCs, which is the kind of content appropriate for a game guide. I'm reinserting the tag. If there is no significant clean-up made to these sections (meaning perhaps that there is no encyclopedic content there that could be properly integrated into the article), then I might cut the whole sections. --Cheeser1 (talk) 08:14, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: :Image:SacrificeBox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 10:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:SacrificeBox.jpg

message: In the next several days, I am going to rewrite the article to conform to Manual of Style, guide for layout, and WikiProject Video games's guidelines, using reliable sources to provide verification for the information.
Basically, this will solve the tags that have been placed at the top of the article, as well as several other violations of policies and guidelines.  The end product will be an article that talks of the game in real-world terms, to both gamers and non-gamers.  Information about the game's development and reception will play an equal or more substantial part than the gameplay (which should give layman a good general idea of how the game is played) and single-player story.
The aim is to get this article to Good article status or even better, to be a Featured article.  For samples of my past video game articles that are FA or GA, refer to Giants: Citizen Kabuto and Freelancer (video game).  Jappalang (talk) 21:14, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  rewritten.  Trying a new approach, so there are no tables of scores; such lists seem practically useless and come across as a bunch of statistics that does not really give objective treatments to the fun or design of the game.  If one reviewer is especially notable (like Siskel and Ebert for movies), then there might be some recognition with their rating.  Next step is to go for peer reviews and assessment.  Jappalang (talk) 03:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009 Rewrite

message: I'll support this article's A-class status. User:Krator (t c) 19:03, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reduced the "highest level" and "regeneration" to simpler terms (though at the expense of more words).  As for manahoars and sac doctors, I am uncertain what is the issue since the third paragraph has described their functions (non-combatants who help to recharge mana, and who convert souls and sacrifices respectively).  Can you clarify what is lacking or suggest what can be done?  As stated in their FURs, the creatures image is to illustrate their artistic design, while the tornado image is to help readers understand the perspective and graphical quality of the spell effect.  It is unlikely to capture both into a single image that is of low enough resolution to clearly depict them.  I have hopes that they would pass muster at FAC.  Jappalang (talk) 14:23, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, I'll reconsider the point on manahoars and sac doctors, it's not really that big of a deal. The image is neither - I think it's good, just warning you it might not fly in FAC. I'll support A-class then. Get someone else to do that and you've got it. User:Krator (t c) 00:08, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Support - after looking over the article and the comments here I'm cool with everything.  I'm not a big fan of not having Template:VG reviews, but it's not totally necessary, and it's still well written. --Teancum (talk) 16:51, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: With two people supporting A-class, I will give Sacrifice the rating. GamerPro64 (talk) 22:29, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A-class review 

message: Could the minimum/recommended system requirements be added? Also, what language was the game written in?Smallman12q (talk) 00:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No reliable sources have given information on what language the game was written in, so I am afraid that request cannot be fulfilled.  As for the minimum system requirements, I have to look for a reliable source for this so it might take a while.  Jappalang (talk) 01:22, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Specs added  Jappalang (talk) 01:32, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Info 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sacrifice (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/68Eil7lYR?url=http://www.ugo.com/games/strategy-games-top-50?page=4 to http://www.ugo.com/games/strategy-games-top-50/?cur=sacrifice&morepics=33
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified