lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jeb Bush

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Guac merchant. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 6#Guac merchant until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm  Talk 04:18, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Guac merchant" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The reference to T. William Fair should be to T. Willard Fair. Tkoco (talk) 14:59, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: RudolfRed (talk) 19:40, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 October 2022 

message: ...licked clean, controlled, barely any mention of Jeb Bush´s deeply unethical "business" behaviors including lying abouot it (Miguel Recarey Medicare fraud scandal)- or rather covered up with miles of irrelevant text. Wuerzele (talk) 20:47, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio seems biased 

message: 2600:100E:B06E:DF32:5946:2955:7426:AAE8 (talk) 23:06, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Says who? Do you have reliable, secondary sources to support such a claim? --Hammersoft (talk) 23:13, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 December 2023
Talk:Alert dialog box

message: "Generically, an alert dialog is a notice to the user that the program cannot properly continue a function due to an error or incomplete requirements.
In its most common intended use, such an alert is presented to the user when the user has entered invalid information for one of the values in an input form. Some example of user input errors that might trigger an alert dialog are: entering a date that does not exist (e.g. "February 30"), using letters in a field that should represent a quantity (number), not providing a required value, or providing a value that is outside the range of the program's capabilities (such as from arithmetic overflow).
The typical alert dialog provides only one option; to close the window. Closing an alert dialog will provide access to the original screen, where the user can make changes to the input values to alleviate the dialog's warnings."''
This passage needs a rewrite, since it reflects poor program design practice. Presenting an alert to castigate the user for entering bad form data is a method of last resort; the fact that thousands of apps do it should not be presented as the right way to do it. I agree that alerts are to be used when an exception arises that means that normal operation cannot continue. But that isn't necessarily their primary purpose. They should be used to warn the user that the NEXT thing that's about to happen could be dangerous, and to give them a chance to back out. That to me is their primary purpose. Apart from exceptions, all other uses should be listed under abuses. Graham 23:33, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Colin Chapman/to do

message: *Add information from these pages  about Chapman's chairs, coffins, and boats, and (especially) the Lotus Microlight aircraft he designed with Burt Rutan.
*Organize page into sections
I think organization is hard because Chapman wore many hats (when he wasn't flinging them in the air--that personal trademark should be in the article too!) simutaneously and never ceased any of them.  So, it would seem chronological is out as an organizing framework.  Maybe something roughly like the following would work:
   * Biographical information
      * Engineer for Bristol Aeroplane
   * Early trials cars and kit cars
   * Chapman as automobile manufacturer
      * Sports cars
      * Luxury specialty cars
   * Chapman as automobile racing director/designer/engineer
      * Sports cars and single-seater formula cars
      * Formula One
   * Chapman as industrial designer/engineer
Someone with skill would then have to weave in how Chapman used racing to improve his road cars (and sometimes vice-versa).  I haven't read up on it, but I can imagine that the design philosophy of a Chapman coffin would mean that it was fully capable of navigating The 2g corner.  
I could see having a 1950s narrative, a 1960s narrative, etc. to put in perspective all that he was simultaneously accomplishing, but I think something like the above with perhaps a bit of interweaving, would be less repetitious and more Encyclopedic.Fotoguzzi 19:31, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Echion (mythology)

message: Article composed of several sourses, all of which appear to be directly quoted from
pantheon.org.  see examples gigantes and argonauts.  It appears that the content is protected as that the page says "© 1995-2004 Encyclopedia Mythica. All rights reserved.".  I am therefore lableing as a speedy delete. Cavebear42 23:56, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Yixuan, Prince Chun

message: Seeing this was among the oldest articles in the Copy Editors queue I have started working on it.
I see that his name changed with time to reflect his status so in the first part "Birth and early life" I opted to go with "Yixuan".  The very first mention is spelled out "Yi Xuan (奕譞)" so people with little or no knowledge of Chinese language can connect the name with it's associated spelling. He will be named "Prince Chun" later so that next name is already where it belongs.  I won't worry about whether he had a childhood name because the historical record doesn't appear to place any importance in whether one existed or it's spelling and pronunciation.  If somebody gets lucky and finds one, by all means put it in before you forget it too. :)
Having no information on his childhood other than his birth I had to settle for cleaning up the description of his mother's status because it is all that can establish his position in the court as a child.  I don't expect there will be much to add unless a family member happens to stop by and contribute something directly because nobody else is likely to have anything but official records of him after he was given his first real job.
I see a need for further editing for grammmar and fluency so I'll concentrate on that as I go through to the bottom but may find other ways to clean things up as I proceed.  If you see any way to improve the article please discuss it here as you work or I might get confused and stumble over your work, accidentally making a mess of it.  Aaron Walkhouse (talk) 16:29, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements in progress 

message: I understand that the intent of this article's naming convention was to reflect the pedantic wishes of British editors obsessing over the article names of their beloved peers. I do not think this convention should apply here. The cardinal number (1st, 2nd, etc.) is used in neither English nor Chinese literature. I would suggest renaming this Yixuan, Prince Chun, and his son Zaifeng, Prince Chun. If there are no objections I will ask an admin to do this in the next few days. Colipon+(Talk) 21:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: Weird! Reliable sources claim that his name is actually "I-huan" (WG), "Ihuan" (Pinyin): Hummel Eminent Chinese of the Ch'ing Period Vol 1 pp. 384-387; Rhoads, Manchus and Han pp. 22, 55, 79, 131, 298; Library of Congress Portraits of I-huan, Prince Ch'un, and views of his palace at Peking, which also gives "Yixuan."
The references for this article are a little weak, and I don't have the 清史稿 here at home. The Chinese Wikipedia article has 奕譞 (Ixuan) but "i Huan" (sic), in romanization with no characters. 
Does anyone know what's up? ch (talk) 23:45, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he actually "Yihuan"?
Talk:Leyland cypress

message: What is the most effective Herbicide to kill unwanted Leylandii, prior to selective felling. I am looking for a Systemic ground application that will not risk other plants by spraying. Comments and advice will be welcome.88.144.47.28 17:48, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Herbicide to kill them?

message: If they're all sterile, how are new leylands grown?  Must they always cross the Monterrey with the Alaskan to make more, or is there another way to grow a new leyland from an existing leyland without cross pollinating? 98.221.141.21 (talk) 22:20, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: By cuttings.  Imc (talk) 00:19, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Growing New Ones

message: I put the history section at the beginning, as this isn't a naturally-occurring tree, and how it came into existence should be mentioned first.  The way it was, after the intro, the article started discussing the taxonomic status of the Nootka cypress, without any mention of why the Nootka cypress is relevant.  This is an encyclopedia, and I don't think it should jump to a topic before it's  explained.  By putting the history first, it will be clear how the Nootka cypress pertains to the Leyland cypress.   98.221.141.21 (talk) 13:05, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved History to beginning
Talk:Imamate in Shia doctrine

message: Shouldn't we have a list that covers all Imams and branches from Ali to people accepted by present-day communities as Imam (like the Aga Khans. Something like the table below from my suggestion at Talk:Caliph:
PLEASE: I know the facts below are not yet right; these are placeholders.
(1) Ali ibn Abu Talib 	(1) Ali ibn Abu Talib	(1) Ali ibn Abu Talib	      	
(2) Hasan ibn Ali     	(2) Hasan ibn Ali    	(2) Hasan ibn Ali    	      	
(3) Husayn ibn Ali    	(3) Husayn ibn Ali   	(3) Husayn ibn Ali   	      	
(4) Ali ibn Husayn    	(4) Ali ibn Husayn   	(4) Ali ibn Husayn   	      	
Twelver               	Zaidi                	Ismaili              	Others	
(5) Muhammad al-Baqir 	                     	                     	      	
(6) Jafar al-Sadiq    	                     	                     	      	
(7) Musa al-Kazim     	                     	                     	      	
(8) Ali al-Rida       	                     	                     	      	
(9) Muhammad al-Taqi  	                     	                     	      	
(10) Ali al-Hadi      	                     	                     	      	
(11) Hasan al-Askari  	                     	                     	      	
(12) Muhammad al-Mahdi	                     	                     	      	
----
I removed the claim that the Prophet Muhammad had always insisted that Ali was his sucessor and changed it to a more neutral claim that Shias believe that he listed Ali as his sucessor due to the incident at Ghadhir Khom.  I believe whoever edited it before was a Shia, and including such information removes neutrality from the article, in my mind at least. 
DigiBullet 20:11, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  List/Table 

message: Greetings and felicitations.  Among other things, I just consolidated two of the reference sections.  If you have comments or concerns, please let me know. —DocWatson42 (talk) 04:29, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consolidation of reference sections
Talk:Day school

message: I don't have time to wokr onthis now, but it seems a bit POV - "day schools are better than boarding schools", is pretty much what it says... ugen64 01:22, Sep 28, 2004 (UTC)
Everything i deleted was essentially opinion as mentioned above.  I think the sentence is enough explanation and no opinion need be involved, but if you can rewrite it so it sounds less defensive, be my guest. 216.207.246.230 02:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: for instance "the pervasive importance of day schools in community-building and in societies in fact makes day schools significantly more important and fruitful than any other form of educational institution."  can you really pretend that is neutral language?  that assertion would require an external source 216.207.246.230 02:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Abu Bakr

message: The redirect Brigades of Abu Bakr Al-Sidiq has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 15:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Brigades of Abu Bakr Al-Sidiq]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Source needs to be cited on claim he was monotheistic before converting. All known historical claims have been that he worshipped idols and then converted to Islam. 47.155.249.154 (talk) 03:52, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abu Bakr was not monotheistic  

message: Change “Muslim view” subheading within the Assessments and Legacy section to “Sunni view”. 162.154.227.115 (talk) 02:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: — Urro[talk][edits] 14:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2024 

message: The name 'Abu Fuhayra' is not appropriate in the list of eight freed slaves by Hazrat Abu Bakr (Ra.). It should be 'Amir ibn Fuhayra' instead of 'Abu Fuhayra'. Arabic names should be handled and written correctly to prevent any confusion.
Thanks. Farhan Akter Arnab (talk) 15:04, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Charliehdb (talk) 10:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2024
Category talk:Pantheists

message: It looks like Paul Vogel snuck in his version of the cosmotheism article here, and no one noticed. Shouldn't what is below be removed? I don't think that this is appropriate for "Category Talk:Pantheism" --Nat 02:23, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Vogel is hard-banned, so yeah, anything he writes may be removed by anyone. —No-One Jones 02:24, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: I tagged the category with  and  as requiring inclusion criteria. The article Pantheism does not really help when deciding whether a person is a member or not, because it appears to cover a range from atheism to theism. What might be usable improvements for this category?
* inclusion criteria to require a reliable source stating that subject X is a naturalistic pantheist?
* split category into three (each with stated criteria as above): Classical pantheists, Biblical pantheists and Naturalistic pantheists?
* abandon category as being too difficult to reliably assign members, and/or merge to List of pantheists where each member's beliefs can be sourced and qualified?
I have posted short notices at Talk:List of pantheists and Talk:Pantheism. Does anyone have better ideas? -84user (talk) 15:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The above issue no longer applies as the article - which previously was highly inaccurate, sabotaged with OR and POV - has now been radically edited for accuracy and neutrality. A Pantheist is someone for whom the Universe is the only "God" - this is clearly the case for Hawking (see below) and Einstein (who accepted "Spinoza's God". --Naturalistic (talk) 23:54, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Classifying people as pantheists even if they did not/do not use the term is very similar to classifying people as pacifists, socialists etc who did not use those terms. A Pantheist is someone with Pantheistic beliefs, which means the Universe/Nature is their only God or "God." Such people existed before 1710, when "pantheistic" was first defined. Such people existed and exist after that word was invented, even though they did not/do not use the term. Naturalistic ✉ 19:20, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for inclusion
Talk:Jeffersonville, Indiana

message: A couple grade schools are missing from my list (such as Bridgepoint Elementary) as I'm unsure about their status. Not listed on the GCCS website, even though I know it still exists at the moment. Anyone have a status on whether this school is closing soon or not? CivilianArthur (talk) 14:59, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeffersonville Schools
Talk:Adenolisianthus

message: While some of this page was a copyright violation, some of it was not. We should salvage what we can instead of wholesale deletion. Danny 02:18, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Nearly all of the text that was here originally was pretty clearly copied. When the original page is a wholesale copyright violation, wholesale deletion is the correct response. In order to salvage things by rewriting them, please use a temp page as the copyvio notice instructs. --Michael Snow 17:06, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Mines

message: I do not belive this category should exist. The Claymore "mine" is not a mine, and the depth charge is not a mine. That leaves just two articles in the category. Unless someone is proposing to write many articles on individual mines, there doesn't seem to be much point to this category. Securiger 02:18, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  comment from 2004
Talk:Dodge Mirada

message: I'm not sure this is correct about the relationship to the Magnum.  My recollection is that car sat on the intermediate platform used by the earlier Satellite and Charger coupes.  The Mirada instead used the compact Volare/Aspen chassis.  I think they were quite different.  (The Cordoba occupied both at different times, however.)  RivGuySC 02:44, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Henryk Zygalski

message: All :Category:Polish cryptographers are :Category:Cryptographers, and the same for mathematicians, so only the most specific categories should remain.  See Wikipedia:Categorization#Creating subcategories. TOO 03:46, Sep 28, 2004 (UTC)
:ok :)--Emax 12:06, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: How does one edit the "Template:Cipher Bureau"?  It needs editing, or scrapping.  logologist 15:11, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One way is to click on the Template:Cipher Bureau link that you just made, and then click "edit this page" as usual. To make things quicker, though, I've added an edit link to the box. — Matt Crypto 16:05, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cipher Bureau template 

message: The article doesn't say when he left Poland (presumably for the UK), and what he did during the war. Was he allowed to work at Bletchley? -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 15:29, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A gap - WW2
Talk:Cornish Rex

message: This article states that the Devon Rex has (short) guard hairs, while the Devon Rex article states that Devons have no guard hairs. Presumably, one of the articles is incorrect.
The edit 23:13, 15 Sep 2004 194.177.166.194 introduced copyright material from [www.petnet.com.au/cat/C107.html petnet] without attribution.  As this is a significant copyright violation I have used the miracle of paraphrase to make the para copyright compliant under Australian law.Fifelfoo 04:32, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Anyone know?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.229.73.48 (talk) 14:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do Cornish Rex have webbed toes? 

message: I think it's worth noting its average lifespan, health, all that. The poor things look sort of sickly. 74.248.63.109 (talk) 18:00, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: @74.248.63.109 There is an issue with HCM in the breed, which I think is important to note, as all kittens should be screened for it. Otherwise they are regarded as a very healthy breed, which contrasts with their strong/unique looks. So I agree with you, just being more specific. The breed is generally very healthy beyond HCM (in contrast to Devons and Sphynxes) Kiwi hell (talk) 21:00, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have a WP:MEDRS then please add the claim to the article under a new health section. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lifespan? 

message: I want wiki to 72.136.90.119 (talk) 01:58, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  are they cute?
Talk:Larisa Trimbobler

message: Her surname is misspelled. The incorrect form probably comes from Hebrew press that mangled rare Yiddish family name by writing it with two letters 'bet' in succession instead of 'beys'+'komets-alef'+'tsvey vovn' ; TV announcers trying to read already incorrect Hebrew spelling and careless journalists mimicking this double mistake. Not everybody was careless - you can check with Google.
The correct form should be Trembovler.
It comes from the Yiddish word 'trembovler' meaning the inhabitant of Trembowla (Polish spelling) or Трембовля (former Cyrillic spelling, now this town is called Теребовля in Ukrainian). I suggest this page should be either renamed or deleted.
*I inserted your spelling version as well. Articles are not "deleted" because of variances in spelling non-English words (which is common). Often, a few versions of a name can be given, see Ivan Chernyakhovsky (Ivan Danilovich Chernyakhovsky, (Cherniakhovsky)). By the way, could you explain to the audience what "tsvey vovn" are...:-) Also why dont you sign your NAME, like so ~~~~ Zai mir gezunt (Which means "Be well" in Yiddish for those of you who may not know :-)!IZAK 04:50, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Caution (Spelling)
Talk:D.N.Angel

message: Kamikaze Kaito Jeanne is a similar story about a female thief. Is there any evidence that one of these stories inspired the other? Should we mention it in the article? JRSpriggs (talk) 12:48, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Now without a reliable source. —Farix (t | c) 14:34, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar story
Talk:Bowers, Delaware

message: Is this really a town?  It's not listed at . john k 05:06, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:You Shall Know Our Velocity

message: A second edition of the hardback edition was published in 2003 in which the extra section is marked in red.  This second edition was given a different name (Sacrament) and was published by McSweeney's in limited quantities, each autographed by the author.
--Brooks 05:27, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't that be reflected in the name of the article? Xsxex 19:54, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point Amazon seems to imply that the actual title of the book does not exlude it. If you can find a more authoritative source, I say move it! -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 21:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there not an (!) Exclamaiton at the end of the book's title?? 

message: I've updated the infobox to reflect the first edition details, as is standard practice for book infoboxes.  It still needs a picture of the first edition book to replace the picture of a reprint copy that's still there.
Also, it is probably worth noting that the first edition was unusual in that it had no dustcover or title page and contents, as the story started on the front board and contined inside. H. Carver 04:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: I have a trade paperback (with exclamation mark in the title) published July 2003 by Vintage, and it states "Previously Retitled as Sacrament", as well as "Note: This paperback edition includes significant changes and additions".
But... the extra segment narrated by Hand is nowhere to be found here. Apparently not all of the paperback editions, contrary to the article.
76.28.255.53 (talk) 08:59, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra content editions