lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:H. Stuart Hughes

message: Please give me a chance to reference this fully.  Much of it was covered in a Havard Magazine article; let me get that and some other sources to verify the memoirs into this before tearing it up too much; but if you have good references and, especially, ISBN's on the books, please feel very free to put them in there.  Hughes was too important not to have an article in Wikipedia when I see so many less notable persons who have an extensive one.Rlquall 02:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is about as far as I'm going to take this article for now; of course I'll improve it if something comes along that I learn and feel needs to be included.  I hope that other editors will continue to improve this article with more references, more details, and more verifiable information.  Prof. Hughes deserves a major article; he will remain influential in history and historiography well after most current video games, and Star Trek sequel episodes, have ceased to seem important.  Rlquall 15:13, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This is as far as I'm going, please improve
Talk:A Claymation Christmas Celebration

message: *I still don't understand why this would be classified as WikiProject:Films.  It was a Christmas special, on TV.  It didn't contain ANY characters from film or movies.  You provided Star Wars Holiday Special as an example, but that is clearly a Film-related television special.  This is not.  -Seinfreak37 15:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See "television movie".  Just because it was first aired on TV does not mean that it's not a film... also see "television special" - where you'll notice that they are described as "films". Esn 16:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair 'nough.  Cheers.  -Seinfreak37 16:49, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject: Films?

message: The description lists them as "beboping" but watching the segment on YouTube, their style appears more similar to doo-wop singers. Can a music-inclined Wikipedian weigh in? Cybertooth85 (talk) 21:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camels in "Three Kings" 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: A Claymation Christmas Celebration →  – actual title E-Kartoffel (talk) 11:24, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 October 2022
Talk:Golden pheasant

message: Golden pheasants seems to duplicate some of the content of this article but is less complete and is not well written. It does contain a more complete description of the bird albeit with numerous typographical errors and errors of punctuation and grammar. It may violate the copywrite of the external link. If no one objects, I'm inclined to replace the content with a redirect to this article. Walter Siegmund (talk) 02:54, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely go for the merge. --Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 20:40, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Support merge. Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:31, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, may need cleaning, jimfbleak 12:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundancy, etc.

message: first it says 'They feed on the ground on grain, leaves and invertebrates' then in the very next paragraph it says 'They tend to eat berries, grubs, seeds and other types of vegetation.' Could/should those be combined in one paragraph to grain, invertebrates, berries, and other types of vegatation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xiahou (talk • contribs) 04:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feeding 

message: The Golden Pheasant was the subject of BBC's Best of Natural History, 2013-04-28. Maybe it can be used as a source. Download URL (audio, 21 min 59 secs, MP3, 10.1 MB). The annotation to the radio broadcast/podcast is:
: "One of Britain's scarcest birds is also one of its most beautiful. The flame-coloured golden pheasant is a riot of red, orange and bronze and is native to Chinese forests. The birds are popular around the world as ornamental species and over the years have been introduced on country estates. Brett Westwood joins Paul Stancliffe of the British Trust for Ornithology in search of wild golden pheasants in the conifer woods of Norfolk. Here, in spite of their bright colours, they are very elusive and behave much as they do in their native China, skulking in dense undergrowth and glimpsed only as they dash across rides. As numbers in China are in decline, do our UK pheasants have an international importance? They prefer to run rather than fly and call loudly at dusk in spring, so this visit is the best chance that Paul and Brett have to see one - a bird that's one of the toughest challenges that the countryside can offer."
--Mortense (talk) 19:34, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 

message: Can you tell any editors that there are any high quality images of the bird's full body? Esagurton (talk) 07:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request for the main image 

message: I came across an article about the Golden Pheasant being classed as 'functionally extinct' in the UK (does the wiki need updating?) and mentioned how it became a naturalised bird in the UK but no reason as to why? Is it because it's  a game bird? I need to know 2A00:23C7:95AD:9701:25DA:8A40:2697:165C (talk) 12:36, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  introduction into other countries
Talk:Amesha Spenta

message: How is it possible that there are two pages, Amesha Spenta and Armaiti, which contain the same text? I am not talking about a redirect here; the two pages have separate addresses, yet they show the same article on Amesha Spenta. The text about Armaiti seems to have been replaced with that concerning Amesha Spenta. And there's no explanation of this in the discussion pages of the two articles!--93.40.112.36 (talk) 13:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Two different pages with the same content?

message: Armaiti was the only Amesha Spenta without a specific article, it redirected here. I started a page, and moved some Armaiti-specific text there. -- Jake (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Spenta Armaiti]]
Talk:Nudie film

message: Is a nudie film the same as a nudie-cutie? The [IMDd] glossary explains neither, and only has a keyword for nudie-cutie Fastifex 06:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

message: *Don't Merge - this article would be a good side topic it the many films in this genre.Ghosts&empties 03:07, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into Nudity in film?
Talk:Walter Lentaigne

message: This article was in terrible shape.  The article ended up being more about Wingate and Slim than it was about the man himself. There was also way too much in the way of attacks from the Tulloch/Calvert camp. I tried to remove the worst of the POV. I want to add the full story of his service in Burma in 1942 but I've run out of time for now. The timeline should also eventually be done away with in favor of something better. 152.163.100.7 03:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Daniel Baker College

message: Was their mascot really the hillbilly?  Can we get another source that confirms that? -- Bovineone 03:12, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mascot
Talk:Dirección de Inteligencia

message: This article has none!  As if all of this were general knowledge ??! — MikeG (talk) 03:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References?! 
Talk:Karl Sanders

message: He was born in Southern California, and now lives in Greenville, South Carolina.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 
75.137.117.177 (talk) 04:12, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio 

message: There were, to the best of my knowledge (and the best of the knowledge of Metal Archives and the official Nile website) no singles released for any albums prior to Ithyphallic. Some videos may have been made, but that is not the same thing at all. I removed them from the discography, but they have been restored. Is there some justification for this? Blackmetalbaz (talk) 16:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Singles

message: I'm sick of seeing these immature anonymous users vandalizing this page saying that Karl Sanders' guitar work is sloppy. It's happened three times since March 7. What is up with that? I'm going to request that this page be protected. BTC 19:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They tend to want to see a lot of vandalism before they'll semiprotect the page.  Best thing for now is to keep an eye on it for now--I will, too, now that you've mentioned it's a problem. Darkspots (talk) 22:46, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously, what the heck is with these anonymous users saying that Karl Sanders' guitar work is sloppy? 

message: I read somewhere that Sanders said something on MySpace or their official forum about writing a few songs on the Prince of Persia: Sands of Time Soundtrack. Obviously these aren't reliable sources but it could be enough to verify it as real until we get an actual source in there. FireCrystal (talk) 01:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Props for you doing that research. Thanks. Hopefully a reliable source can be found for that claim. BTC 02:14, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince of Persia Soundtrack 
Talk:Lowry Avenue Bridge

message: Looking at a few external sites, including http://www.steelconstruction.info/Tied-arch_bridges, it would suggest that this is a thrust arch bridge rather than a ties arch bridge - the forces in this bridge are carried by the foundations.  The deck is just suspended from the arch, it's not under tension.  Any objections to me making a change to the bridge type? 82.10.224.23 (talk) 06:56, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a [[Tied arch bridge]] or a [[thrust arch bridge]]?
Talk:Twilight of the Superheroes

message: The article itself refers to "The Death of Superman" which was published first in Dec 1992. It makes no sense that the article is from 1987.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.203.224.200 (talk) 14:43, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: 1987 Timing doesn't make sense

message: Dear God, this article is almost one long quote. Thanos6 03:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but when you're quoting Alan Moore, that's pretty much all you need. Insomniac By Choice 18:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But this doesn't even come close to Fair Use. MK2 12:04, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Something needs to be done about it though. Way too long.  RobJ1981 01:32, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

text: It was longer but trimmed down because it bordering on copyright violation  Obviously there is room for it to be expanded back up - the sources are there just keep it brief. (Emperor 23:41, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Length

message: Why is this even an article?  There is nothing worth reporting on a story that never saw print.JoeyFNK 21:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Twilight proposal made significant waves among internet fandom when it surfaced in the 90s.  I think it's as deserving of an article as many other internet phenomenons.  In addition, this is a significant "lost work"  from a man who is perhaps THE most important living writer in American comics.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.221.152 (talk) 02:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Also, some story elements that have their origins here were used in mainstream DC some time later.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.7.228.224 (talk) 10:54, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason?
Talk:Ian Copeland

message: I have added a reference and turned it from a bio-stub into a musical bio-stub. Capitalistroadster 03:19, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ponerosteus

message: Ponerosteus may be either a bird or a pterosaur (Fejfar et. al. 2005). Given the difficulties in telling isolated pterosaur long bones apart from the long bones of Mesozoic birds, the exact systematic position of Ponerosteus in Ornithodira is uncertain at best until histological analysis is performed on the holotype.
Fejfar, O., Košťák, M., Kvaček, J., Mazuch, M., and Moučka, M. 2005. First Cenomanian dinosaur from Central Europe (Czech Republic). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 50 (2): 295–300. 68.4.28.33 (talk) 15:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ponerosteus a pterosaur?
Talk:Lightstorm (strain)

message: Strain of what? Is it a bird, is it a bee, is it superman? 
Where is the general interduction of what you are taling about int the first place? NothingMuch 03:22, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Based on my google search, the following line is a reference to the picture author, which I removed. 
Lightstorm is an "Overgrow strain" developed by Gotpurplebud? , a project to be shared with the community.
--Voidvector 10:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gotpurplebud 

message: Copy-edited today, as requested. Tag now removed. thisisace 20:41, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy-edit
Talk:Something Green and Leafy This Way Comes

message: It's a STUB... for an album... by a band... why would that equare to a Speedy deletion? Xinit 03:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cobell v. Salazar

message: This article needs updating.... AnonMoos 03:29, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The proposed settlement of Dec 8, 2009 has allocated $2 billion dollars for dealing with fractionation issues. Studerby (talk) 20:30, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Studerby. Fractionation is at the heart of the Cobell litigation. I'm hoping to work on updating and providing citations for this article soon...KTRuppel 19:43, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Update needed

message: It seems to me that a lot of the information in this article would better go in the article Dawes Act (General Allotment Act) -- it actually gives a more detailed discussion of the implementation & problems of the Act than the stuff already in that article. Then a briefer background, with a "Main article at" wikilink to the Dawes Act, could be provided. Of course, references/citations would be really helpful too -- this article's General Allotment Act discussion is sorely lacking them.
Thoughts? --Yksin 23:00, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dawes Act

message: I noticed that "Contempt Trials" and "Historical Accounting Trial" are empty sections and were introduced. Does anybody know the purpose of these? I'm personally inclined to remove them as they have no content, but I'm unfamiliar with the playing field. Thanks Hasteur (talk) 20:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. 67.101.6.33 (talk) 19:34, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Empty Sections?
Talk:Charrrmed!

message: User:PikDig recently attempted to correct the title of this page, it should have an "!" . Unfortunately, he or she tried to copy/paste the article to the new title instead of using the move function. I redirected the new article back here until the move can be completed properly. Please don't change the redirect until this is sorted out. Thanks. —MiraLuka 03:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note on Recent Attempted Move

message: Charrrmed (Charmed episode) → Charrrmed! (Charmed episode) –  A user discovered that the correct article title contains an exclamation point (see , but s/he attempted to fix this by copy/pasting the article to the new name and redirecting the old article to the new one. I am now asking that the old article be moved to the new location to preserve the edit history. … Please share your opinion at Talk:Charrrmed (Charmed episode). —MiraLuka 03:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support as the nominator. —MiraLuka 03:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 08:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support as the nominator. —MiraLuka 03:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 08:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:The Thin Man

message: Maikel (talk) 13:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to The Thin Man (film) it was "the lead suspect" but this is not correct.  It's a while since I've seen the film, but the "thin man" was the murder victim.   I can't remember exactly what happened but a body was found and was assumed to be the missing man but the clothing on the body was too large, and the missing man was "thin".  Something like that, I can't remember exactly.   The name became associated with William Powell who played Nick Charles, and who was quite tall and thin, and hence the movie sequels all used the term.   Rossrs (talk) 13:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: So, who is the Thin Man?

message: I think some editor is getting the movie and the book mixed up. The book is much less comical, and Charles is drawn into the case because he is shot by Morelli and otherwise harassed by various people, not because he is looking for fun. Megalophias (talk) 21:30, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixed up with the movie?

message: At one point, Mimi strikes Dorothy, and Nick comments that next time, Mimi should bring some 'little white whips'. This seems to be a specific reference to something, but what? The article would be improved by finding out, and giving a reference. 4.16.41.83 (talk) 23:42, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Little White Whips

message: Is it really "germ" or "gem"
In the 'A change in direction' section — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhi M Balakrishnan (talk • contribs) 
:It's germ. See dictionary.com DonQuixote (talk) 22:37, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The germ of the novel was a 1930 draft
Talk:Volvo C70

message: All Volvos have been manufactured by the Ford Motor Company since Ford's acquisition of Volvo in 1998. This is simply fact. So what is the dispute here? And furthermore, why is this dispute taking place on the C70 page specifically? Also, Pininfarina was a designer of the C70, not its manufacturer. Jagvar 03:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See the Pininfarina Sverige part of the Pininfarina article. --Dahlis 16:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ford Motor Company

message: A 2.3L high pressure turbo is in a model known as a "cabriolte". A 2.4L low pressure turbo is a "cabrolet". Where is this differance of information hiding? 71.114.216.32 14:03, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cabriolte 

message: Basically please don't because they would be considered biased and can't be included in the article.
It would even be better to add unsourced material than that from an Owners club since someone else can confirm it from another source and improve the article with it.
Thanks Jenova20 10:37, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising of Owners Clubs

message: I understand that the C70 was the 780's successor and I tried to add that but my edit isn't showing up. I would like for someone else to help me with that.--Kevjgav (talk) 00:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I need help with the chronology 

message: I hope all of you understand that my intentions are good. I added the chronology to make this article consistent with Volvo 780 and Volvo 262C, but if my edit is reverted, I understand.--Kevjgav (talk) 00:59, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added chronology-consistent with "Volvo 780" and "Volvo 262C" 
Talk:Zlata Filipović

message: For some reason, this small discussion was slapped into the main article.  I'm including it here, where it belongs, so it can be dealt with and not clutter the article with people talking to each other. Rebochan 04:02, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Knowledge gap hypothesis

message: hello. This hypothesis isn't economics or finance-related article. It's about sociology and media studies. The template which relates this article to economics articles isn't appropriate.--Sa.vakilian 04:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. I removed it.--Communicator1 09:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: knowledge gap hypothesis

message: Is it about Inferential distance (lesswrong.com link) ? --Nashev (talk) 21:41, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inferential distance 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jenct93 (talk) 07:29, 3 December 2023 
I learned how Wikipedia is structured and how the articles can be edited and reviewed by experts.  Wikipedia did provide easy to follow training modules and the video clips help me understand the concepts.   I approached critiquing the selected article with an open mind and after researching the topic of knowledge gap, I approached it with a critical eye and made sure the content was correct and timely for the article. 
  Since my topic: Knowledge gap is still a hypothesis and not a fully recognized theory, I struggled to understand if and how it would become a verified theory. I selected pieces of content from different sources for example text books and peer-reviewed journal articles.
(UTC)The article does deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps: lower socioeconomic status.   It should address the topics related to historically underrepresented populations but I was not sure how to convey it in the article.  I wanted to use the following statement from the book, The Knowledge Gap: the hidden cause of America's broken education system, author Natalie Wexler states, that an education historian, Diane Ravitch argues there's nothing wrong with the American education system as a whole.  Our more affluent students are doing fine; it's only the schools serving poor kids that need help - an insertion that has been challenged.  But even assuming she is right, there's still the question of what kind of help to provide.  Rather than focusing on the knowledge gap, she says that " poverty is a bigger problem than curriculum."  And that standardized tests "reflect family income, not knowledge or learning." (Wexler, 116)  GS2325 (talk) 06:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: COMM 500 Theory and Literature of Communication
Talk:Half-Life 2: Episode Three

message: There are recent reviews about half Life 3 having a deaf character apparently . Hervegirod (talk) 10:48, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Very intriguing. However, it's probably not enough to warrant Episode 3 getting it's article back. --Thejadefalcon (talk) 11:07, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New deaf character
Talk:Jim Trimble

message: I have added section headings and a copy of his obituary. Capitalistroadster 04:26, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kaena: The Prophecy

message: This is the second work by Xilam to be aimed at adults, after Stupid Invaders, in addition to being the first adult animated film to be produced by it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:18D:4700:7640:5D0F:7311:AE57:2249 (talk) 22:33, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: First adult animated film by Xilam

message: Infobox added Garand70 21:55, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled