Talk:Sunrise (Australian TV program)

message: Found this page looking for information about Sunrise on Sky News. Added the standard link at the top to make it easier to distinguish between the two. --UkNews 23:35, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunrise (UK) 

message: I notice some to-and-fro'ing in the edit history regarding article name.  User:Reflex Reaction has (more than once) moved the article to Sunrise (TV series), at the same time linking to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television) which states "For all other programs use (TV program) or (TV programme)" for non episodic television.  If there are no arguments I'll move the article to Sunrise (TV program) -- Chuq 09:04, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  I've fixed double redirects, but I'll wait for any arguments or counter-pagemoves before changing all the rest. -- Chuq 07:19, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

text: *I've fixed all the other page links so they now all point to (TV program) as against (TV series). -TonyW 23:08, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks Tony.  Unfortunately, someone else (this time User:TKLM) has decided to go and move the page to Sunrise (Australia) without any discussion at all. (I've now reverted it).  -- Chuq 04:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Added by User:70.69.9.186
:"Recently, a guest made a joke that he want his girlfriend to "get the fuck out". The hosts were shocked by the audience gave a heavy applause."
I removed this because the incident mentioned was actually a segment of satirical program The Chasers War on Everything, and was not part of the actual Sunrise program. The following is from The Advertiser:
: "A SEGMENT on satirical news program The Chaser's War on Everything featuring two prominent Channel 7 personalities was planned, pre-recorded and done with the network's knowledge, a spokeswoman said yesterday.
:The segment, which aired on ABC-TV, featured Sunrise hosts David Koch and Melissa Doyle.
:During it, a member of the Chaser team seemed to swear violently at his girlfriend via the camera, "shocking" the much-beloved breakfast duo. The segment has since found new life on the internet.
:A spokeswoman for Channel 7 said the interview was "a mock-up". "Mel, Kochie and the Chaser boys are all friends," she said. " 
If I get time I'll re-add the correct information. Tntnnbltn 06:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chasers 

message: who evers putting words in "quotation" marks really needs to source the quotes or else ill remove the POV ones.--Whywhywhy 09:16, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "" 

message: Someone suggested merging the Sunrise traffic reports with the main Sunrise article. I don't think this should be done as it is not actually part of the Sunrise program, because it is just shown in ad breaks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brad F 89 (talk • contribs) 11:16, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They arent prominent enough for their own page. They should be merged. - Mike Beckham 11:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

text: The whole page is just a gratuitous list of 'celebrities', which certainly doesn't deserve it's own article - to the normal viewer they are part of the program (or at least they are to me). There are other aspects of Sunrise/parts of this article that are more deserving of attention. timg231 02:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traffic Reports 

message: I'd like to know why Sunrise has the BIGGEST news scrolling bar (in height). It's almost double the text in it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.120.20 (talk) 08:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that way the text won't get chopped off by some TV screen's overscan. The box is high because the scrolling text needs to fit into the 'Title safe' area. timg231 02:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large Scrolling News Text? 

message: The coloured bars are pretty garish, and don't really match Wikipedia style.  I have left a note on User talk:59.101.106.7 (the IP who introduced the changes). -- Chuq (talk) 
09:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. They don't add much to the article. Recurring dreams 09:53, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coloured bars 

message: Kylie Gillies is hosting until a new host is found - please do not change again. Lisa is not coming back on Sunrise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.132.70.26 (talk) 02:30, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weekend Sunrise Changes 

message: It looks like there is quite a lot of emphasis on the positives of the show and very little about it's critisisms and other bad stuff so i believe that this article has been heavily edited by channel seven — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.31.204.33 (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a "Controversy" section. Also if you believe the article is not written from a neutral point of view, you are welcome to change it for the better. Recurring dreams 00:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did channel seven pay some to right this 

message: :Image:Sunrise, Australia.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:22, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Sunrise, Australia.jpg

message: :Image:Sunrise intro.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Sunrise intro.jpg

message: Do you think i should add Andrew Daddo and johanna griggs to the presenters template becuase of their 3 weeks as anchors of 'Olympic Sunrise" ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.220.79.178 (talk) 04:14, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olympic Sunrise 

message: Is this really a controversy? It was infact proven that ACA are in the wrong, and got the double slap with ACMA rewarding them with a notice saying that they've gotten their facts wrong numerous times. Mel and Kochie being ambushed on air by a number of idiots from the "A Current Affair" fan club for talking about National Bingo Night isn't really a controversy - they did nothing wrong and actually turned out in the end to do their best to help the viewers. Although remember that the rules, as pointed out by Today Tonight later in that evening, showed that the viewers are in the wrong, and that if the episode doesn't air, then the contestants don't get the money.
What do you guys think? Sunrise weren't arguing, disagreeing or agreeing with them. They infact didn't interact with them at all. And finally after all, how has Kochie got anything to do with handing out payments for National Bingo Night? Alltrainzfan (talk) 00:49, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy: Sunrise vs A Current Affair 

message: Is Jessica Rowe really the new sunrise weather presenter?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Me myself & er (talk • contribs) 06:36, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Weather Presenter 

message: i enjoy the sunrise weekend program but would like too see it on till at least 11am or even till 12 midday kids gwt enough tv by watching abc 1 2 3 do more for the disabled adults 
regards shirley brown
disabled adult  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.187.14.110 (talk) 00:20, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  sunrise weekend program 

message: "Misterkillboy" has reverted the removal of his poorly-written reference to the Justin Bieber concert despite the absence of any discussion here. This paragraph included numerous errors, including:
Incorrect spelling of "criticised", 
"5AM", 
Absence of comma in causal clause "To placate fans Bieber...". 
The whole paragraph was written in a way that suggested the blame should rest with "Sunrise", even though the events actually indicated that the misbehaviour of the crowd was the only reason. Some of it was downright wrong, such as:
"...they could not foresee the sheer number of fans that would turn up." 
Besides that, The reference to the parents' comments is irrelevant hearsay and shouldn't be included, especially if the parents are wrong, such as where it says
"Parents claimed the event was poorly organised with non-existent crowd control measures". 
Nonsense like this would certainly give false impressions to anyone who reads the article, particularly since the truth is not written. Channel 7 did have an idea of the crowd size beforehand and went to great lengths to organise it. They even hired the same people who deal with the Big Day Out, which is much more significant than this concert. The whole paragraph was clearly an attempt to criticise Sunrise through the publication of hearsay and picking and choosing sources based solely on their opinions. Such activity is a detriment to the encyclopaedia and must not take place, especially not without any discussion. (Huey45 (talk) 14:07, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive reverting by user "Misterkillboy" 

message: Such as:
* International versions of Wheel of Fortune
--222.64.212.26 (talk) 00:21, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info about the topic of [[Nightfall television]] 

message: Removed the additional citations needed banner. It was added back in 2010, and there are more than 10 references listed on this article. --RichardMills65 (talk) 06:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  additional citations 

message: It would be a surprise to Richie Benaud for him to be described as a fast bowler. 120.20.101.13 (talk) 21:51, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports News