lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gaudiya Vaishnavism

message: As it stands, this entry does not contain adequate traditional or academic source material, and indeed many of the references are questionable, subpar or biased to one particular Gaudiya group, i.e. the Hare Krishna Movement. Vyasashuka (talk) 20:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Deleted "and Hare Krishna" at the beginning of the entry because this is too biased to the "Hare Krishna Movement," which seems the implied, but not stated, reference. Vyasashuka (talk) 21:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terms and Translations 

message: From the preface, this book looks to be a good, unbiased, secondary source that someone can quote from. There is a section titled "Chaitanya" on pages 260 to 262, where the last paragraph talks about the sect and its followers at that time.
* 
Jroberson108 (talk) 15:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source: Hindu Mythology, Vedic and Puranic 

message: There have been some recent edits that remove and revert the usage of "Bengali Vaishnavism" as an alias name. In reviewing the reference, I found that the cited page 703 doesn't exist on the ref's linked page, so I added the "Failed verification" template. I did find in the preface that it says "Bengal Vaisnavism is not co-extensive with the religious system associated with the name of Caitanya and his adherents". Further discussion can be had here to avoid an edit war. Jroberson108 (talk) 16:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You are wright. There are the other branches of Vaishnavism, but Gaudiya branch commonly considered as the most characteristic form of Vaishnavism in Bengal, that is why often colled the Bengali. I shell add some in the lead. DayakSibiriak (talk) 01:16, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bengali Vaishnavism 

message: Paramadvaiti Sat Depravananta Godasa 179.58.93.55 (talk) 18:47, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bhakti Aloka
Talk:Inclusionary zoning

message: The following are link farm that was dumped in the article. Removed them per WP:EL. parking them here for reference to editors. Graywalls (talk) 07:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  link farm from article space parked
Talk:Eaton Centre

message: * I reverted the changes made by 64.229.24.114 to the last version by SimonP.  Removing all the information from this article, and creating new articles for each of the malls (each containing one or two sentences)  -- without adding any new information -- does not help the reader.  One simply ends up having to read 7 articles instead of 1 to get the same information.  Skeezix1000 22:26, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question.  It might not need it. I was the culprit, and I can't for the life of me remember why.  There's the Eaton Center office building in Cleveland, but I don't imagine there's much risk of confusion between the two articles.  --Skeezix1000 11:30, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Let me try to explain it, then - you couldn't edit Eaton Centre, since it was a redirect to Toronto Eaton Centre; not being an admin, you couldn't delete the redirect to re-create the page, so you picked a new title, and then changed the redirect page to point to your new page. And now, here we are... I'll fix'er up right now. Mindmatrix 02:05, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It probably wasn't that well thought out.  Unless the Eaton Centre article was protected, I could have simply edited it to remove the redirect and create a new page.  I was new to Wikipedia, so I suspect the decision had a lot more to do with inexperience than logic.  In any event, Bearcat's suggestion is a good one -- thanks for implementing it.  --Skeezix1000 11:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily. It's not easy to get to a redirect in order to edit it, since the normal processes will bypass the redirect itself and bounce you to the target article; you have to know how to get directly to a redirect page. I'm sure you know how to do that now; you probably didn't know how to do it then. So, yeah, inexperience, sure...but Mindmatrix is probably right too. Bearcat 23:05, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I bet that's exactly it.  --Skeezix1000 10:13, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: November 2005
Talk:Medicinal tea

message: There's so little verified information in this article, and the topic is redundant with other Wikipedia articles, that I think it may be better if this was redirected and merged into Herbalism, a more developed article on a similar topic. No offense to those that worked on this, but the article is currently full of original research which is prohibited. Or it could be rewritten with good research, but Wikipedia needs to focus on the core policies of WP:NOR and Wikipedia:Verifiability in order to have any impact. - Taxman Talk 22:29, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I've decided to be bold and redirect the article to herbalism. If someone wants to do some actual research on tea as a specific form of herbalism, they can turn the redirect into an actual article. What was here, was useless. - Taxman Talk 15:27, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems
Talk:Roman festivals

message: this site needs to show the Roman deity Festivals for the specific god. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.81.82.114 (talk • contribs).
The battle of Lake Trasimene was on June 24, not June 23. And (please note I know nothing on the subject) why would they not remember the battle of Cannae?
145.53.132.133 21:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm very unfamiliar with Republican history. Wikipedia's Battle of Lake Trasimene page gives the date as June 24. The Oxford Classical Dictionary gives June 21. Ovid (Fasti 6.768) says the "date of the disaster" was "the tenth day from the end of the month" ("quintus ab extremo mense bis ille dies"), which the Loeb and Penguin both interpret as June 22, apparently counting ten days inclusively from July 1. We need someone better informed than I am to sort this out. EALacey 22:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Royal Cache

message: This article neglects to credit Charles Wilbour's important contribution in finding/securing the tomb. It was Wilbour who identified the villains after numerous attempts to get them to 'come clean.' Good thing too, because soon after the clearing of the tomb, major parts of it collapsed (because of the friability of the rock, it is always at risk of further collapse). The standard Egyptology narration, in variance with the facts, always over-credits Maspero, denigrates Brughsch, apologizes for the Rasuls (even credits them; after all the cave is now named after them!) and completely ignores Wilbour. Curious considering this find is as important, if not more important than the tomb of Tut. I guess Egyptology is still, to this day, a messy and political endeavour. Some fully credentialed Egyptologists actually cite the movie, "The Night of Counting the Years" (an avowed piece of fiction) as a source. For shame!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.99.33.53 (talk) 21:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Charles Wilbour

message: Citations in the text are there, but they are not yet hyperlinked. I moved them from Bibliography to References. Y-barton (talk) 04:18, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: The addition of photographs does not enhance the article imo. In my own culture it is considered by many people as gross desecration. Surely the article can be read without such images? Anyone who wants to see them can be directed to the media section of wikipedia. Would anyone object to their removal?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.199.3.206 (talk) 17:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As no objections raised I have made the change. Thank you. 92.40.194.39 (talk) 14:36, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  You already tried at least twice on Ahmose-Nefertari. Once again, Wikipedia is not censored. Your complaints are no more valid than those of those who do not want to see depictions of Muhammad on his page. Just give up. Lone-078 (talk) 16:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Respect for the dead
Talk:Molecular term symbol

message: I think Ώ can not take negative value since it is defined as the absolute value of ML+MSLiuxunchen (talk) 06:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: mistake

message: This seems to overlook more general molecular term symbols where the main symbol is the irreducible representation symmetry of the particular state of interest.  This is significantly more interesting and general than diatomic molecular term symbols.
=== Changing the format ===
I would like to re-structure the article a bit. I would like to make clear that there are three different systems for labelling molecular states; the first is the one discussed in the present form of the article and is used ONLY for diatomic molecules (uses the projection of the angular momentum along the axis etc). The second system uses the group representation labels. The third system just gives empirical labels X, A, B, C..., a, b, c... L0rents (talk) 17:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I would like to re-structure the article a bit. I would like to make clear that there are three different systems for labelling molecular states; the first is the one discussed in the present form of the article and is used ONLY for diatomic molecules (uses the projection of the angular momentum along the axis etc). The second system uses the group representation labels. The third system just gives empirical labels X, A, B, C..., a, b, c... L0rents (talk) 17:20, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing the format
Talk:One from the Heart

message: I'm surprised that this movie doesn't have an article yet, considering it's from such a major director, and is, from what I gather, one of his more important movies, behind a handful of rather obvious ones.  I haven't actually seen the film before, so I don't know how much more I can contribute. Thebogusman 23:03, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not that TG ca 1982 isn't pleasant to look at, but the need for seeing her nude photo to illustrate "cast" just doesn't rise to the "fair use" criterion of "critical comment or illustration." DavidOaks (talk) 21:52, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted Teri Garr Image
Talk:Gage Blackwood

message: If it wouldn't be violating copyright, it'd be nice if we could get some of Gage's vital statistics- I believe there a lot of them in his personnel file in the biochip in Journeyman Project 2.
It'd be really nice if we were to put it in a box.
: I added everything on his background in 'early life' and his hobbies in the trivia sections if that's what you meant. StargateX1 06:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, that is the sort of thing I meant. Thanks for all the pictures too! Thanks also to everyone who improved this article, including fixing my spelling errors!--ElephantForgets 22:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gage's Vital Statistics 

message: As requested, I categorized this article properly. It was oddly difficult to find a proper category! But then it turned out that the category was obvious and I had known of it before! Oh well.
--ElephantForgets 15:55, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization 

message: It was also made by several other people, including User:ShadowMan1od and User:Anamanfan. Thanks to them too.--ElephantForgets 19:21, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Others Who Made JP Franchise Template
Talk:Jan Scruggs

message: Gleaned most of this from lecture companies; still a bit below potential. If anyone wants a crack at it, please do so. Thought someone so key to one of the most visited memorials in Washington would have a bit more said about him than a mere sentence. --Impaciente 21:37, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: "Scruggs' parents divorced when he was 14 years old. His mother moved away, and his father remarried when Scruggs was in his senior year in high school. The summer after he graduated from Bowie High School, he turned 19 years old. With his parents unable to afford college and feeling awkward at home around his newly married father and step-mother, he decided to leave home. He enlisted in the U.S. Army in August 1968, having given little thought to the fact that the Vietnam War was raging."
1) he turned 19 on March 11, 1969, NOT the summer after high school. For one thing, March is in the Spring.
2) this paragraph also implies he joined the army after he turned 19, which can't be true if the Aug 1968 date is correct
3) remove "The summer after he graduated from Bowie High School, he turned 19 years old." and this paragraph would make a lot more sense. 
:70.161.8.90 (talk)
70.161.8.90 (talk) 20:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph all wrong
Talk:Billinge, Merseyside

message: Only Billinge Chapel End uses 01744, Billinge Higher End uses 01695. - Man2
:Actually, one side of the road, in Billinge Higher End uses the 01695 dialling code and the other side uses the 01942 dialling code. Billinge itself has a telephone exchange just off Main Street and it is linked to the 01744 dialling code. 80.192.242.187 23:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Telephone area codes

message: Is there any information as regards Greenfield Orphanage.
I was there as a boy till 1953.
It was also a Nunnery and the Orphanage was run by the Sisters.
I believe that overall supervision was by the Childrens Department in Wigan.
I was fostered to a family in Hindley and had regular visits from a member of the Childrens Department.
Orphanboy.
Orphanjohn (talk) 21:12, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greenfield Orphanage Billinge. 
Talk:Weblogs, Inc.

message: Page has been cleared of resolved merge discussion to allow for new merge discussion Hackaday 22:25, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Archived instead.  --Interiot 22:41, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page cleared 
Talk:Sporophyll

message: I modified the page to add more detail and emphasize homology of structure across vascular plants.  In the earlier version there was also one error--in Ophioglossum the sporangia are born on a specialized portion of a single leaf, rather than on specialized sporophylls.  In this case the sporangium-bearing part of the leaf is usually called a sporophore and the vegetative portion a trophophore, with the whole leaf being a sporophyll, but this is unnecessary detail for current purposes... Paalexan 00:01, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Safe (1995 film)

message: the film is full of the most insane pseudo science, eg the wrenwood head says AIDS and other immune disorders are in your mind
just crazy nonsense
I think the film takes thus utter garbage seriously, which is just scary  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.245.17.105 (talk) 16:06, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: insane pseudo science

message: Cas 2600:8801:8C1D:C700:CC3C:D750:EA51:F41B (talk) 05:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast list should include Ronnie Farer as Barbara!
Talk:Nizamabad, Telangana

message: Hello, I noticed that the city population is highly inflated needlessly. Census of India explicitly says the population is 310,467 as per this source . Therefore I corrected it in this edit here.
Also, the infobox says Rural and Urban. Frankly, how can there be rural in a city? Also, the population of Nizamabad (Urban) and Nizamabad (Rural) legislative constituencies is simply added to get the city population. This is totally incorrect as legislative constituency is not the same as the city. Therefore I removed them in the same edit.
Please cite WP:RS before changing the city population.
Ab207 (talk) 17:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated the city population based on this source, you can review my edit here -Ab207 (talk) 11:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population  

message: I believe you are mixing up official name and other name. Not used by any government body merely means that the name is not official anymore. That does not change the fact the city is referred as Indur in other contexts. One of the sources  in the article make it abundantly clear that the city is also called Indur. Ab207 (talk) 04:12, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indur 

message: Telangana state was formed in the year 2014 120.88.178.46 (talk) 11:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: We know that - which is why the opening paragraph states "Nizamabad became a part of the newly formed state of Telangana by the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014" - Arjayay (talk) 11:36, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telangana state was formed in the year 2014
Talk:Gävleborg County

message: I think that county and län are not the same thing. A län is a administrativ region, which nowadays mainly has the main task of providing health care. In swedish "landsting".
--R@zor 00:12, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not understand your point, please clarify. You are saying that län = landsting? Fred-Chess 01:33, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Is 'For the list of governors see main article' an accidental duplication (as a link to the list of governors is provided later in the same paragraph) or meant to link to a different page entirely? Jackiespeel (talk) 10:49, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Administration
Talk:Pedot

message: I can't find a source for this, so I'm moving it here. Any ideas where it's from?
"The album is thematically loosely based on continuing the themes about the manifestation of evil from their previous record Aion, but apart from the previous record's spiritual themes Pedot is more concentrated on human beings and their problems about dealing with the evil found in the world." Jafeluv (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme 
Talk:Permeability (materials science)

message: This doesn't tell enough about the oxygen of the rocks.
:what do you mean by that; the chemistry of the aquifer material?  In most cases aquifers (not sure about oil reservoirs) are considered inert and non-reactive --kris 16:13, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could I suggest moving this article to Permeability (hydrology)?
# It is a property used by geologists, hydrologist ... hell, even geographers and engineers.
# It kind of implies this is a phenomena exclusive to rocks, when is false, and can be measured/applied in peat, landfills, etc.
# It would make it more in-line with related processes, such as Infiltration (hydrology)
# Consider the basic simple definitions:
#*Hydrology is the study of the flow of water through the earth.
#*Geology is the study of rocks, and the history of earth.
Please post comments below. Mwtoews 16:45, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the article to Permeability (earth sciences). A lot of folks were linking here from articles about physiology and biology (and paint). --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 19:35, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This should be Permeability (Materials science). Moved. My very best wishes (talk) 03:04, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Article naming

message: In the USA, we are economically exploiting hydrocarbon reservoirs with permeabilities 1/10 to 1/1000th less than 100 mD suggested here.  This is an everyday occurance.  One of the largest natural gas plays in the USA, The Barnett Shale, has reservoir permeabilities in the micro darcy range.  (0.001 mD).  These wells produce on average over 1/2 mmcf/d, with initial production rates often more than 3 to 5 Mcf/d.
One might argue however that these reservoirs require stimulatin to be economic, but I think the blanket statement that 100 mD is a minimum is rediculus.  An Oil reservoir with 10 mD is easilly exploitable with just a little knowledge. 
Also, fluid permeability is not just a function of consolidated rock media.  Darcy's law was derived from flow through sand beds used to purify water in Paris, France.
Dallas 75205 19:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exploitable Hydrocarbon Reservoir are well below 100mD 

message: There is a misleading statement; "The tensor is positive definite as the component of the flow parallel to the pressure drop is always in the same direction as the pressure drop". This is not always true; if the author means pressure gradient when using "pressure drop", this statement is only true when considering the principal directions as obtained from solving the eigenproblem. I suggest changing it to "The tensor is positive definite because the energy being expended (the inner product of fluid flow and pressure gradient) is always positive". Backwatering (talk) 12:18, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anisotropic permeability
Talk:Tabon Man

message: This article has no sources cited. It is important to cite sources so that other editors can check the article's validity - especially when quotes are involved. -- Greaser 00:52, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs referencing 

message: A follow up to your note in Talk:Ethnic_groups_in_the_Philippines#Tabon_man_was_not_Negrito: The only source here for the statement that the Tabon man is not Negrito is Scott (1984), citing craniometric evidence. Have you come across more recent literature about it? Craniometry always leaves a certain margin of error when assigning skeletal remains to ancient populations, and I have seen quite a number of cases where aDNA-methods have shown that earlier craniometric studies were off the mark. Moderns studies which I have found leave the question open, e.g. Matsumura et al. (2018):
Or they remain speculative, e.g. Omoto et al. (2020):
The idea that the Tabon specimens belonged to a population that is ancestral to the modern-day Negritos is also not at odds with Larena et al. (2021), who date the entry of early Negrito populations at around 
around 47kya (Note however that Tabon man is not mentioned in Larena et al. (2021), so this is WP:synthesis which we cannot do in article space).
I suggest to remove the final statement about Tabon man not being Negrito, and replace it with the more careful assessment by Matsumura et al. –Austronesier (talk) 11:30, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tabon skull "not Negrito"? 

message: I've reverted this insertion and moved it here for discussion because the assertion re "new set of specis" appears too bold without more support and the sourcing is too vague.
Some googling leads me to suspect that the Homo Piningsis name there might be associated with Peking Man; I didn't find any mention close to the other two names. See also e.g., [, etc. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 08:46, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insertion re new species moved here for discussion 

message: Tabon man Eden Tabig (talk) 12:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History