Talk:Jazz harmony

message: This page is a little naive in it's elevation of jazz harmony over "traditional" harmony.  As can be seen in other Wikipedia pages, mainstream European composers had incorporated many of the harmonic innovations a century before Coltrane, and the principles of even harmolodics is firmly rooted in Asian and middle-eastern music -- the jazz composers did bring some innovation, I don't discount that completely, but they were primarily synthesists. Among that first generation of World-Aware post-WWII composers, they were people who now knew first hand of the musics of Europe, Asia and (later) Africa, and thanks to field recordings (eg Lomax) and radio/records distribution, they were also keenly aware of the music that had preceded them. Coltrane was a big fan of Slonimsky and many jazz composers cite Bartok and Scriabin and others as sources for the 'innovations' they adapted to the jazz idiom.  Indeed, Wagner's "Tristan chord" is still bleeding edge.
:I agree for the most part in your statement in that this page seems to take a naive stance on placing Jazz harmony above traditional harmony. Classical composers, for the most part, worked with complex and sophisticated harmonic concepts 50-60 years before the jazz cats caught on, and Coltrane and all of them took the extended harmony of the early 20th century composers and figured out how to improvise around it. What I don't agree with you is that jazz harmony is just a synthesis of classical concepts for a improvisers art form (what I'm taking your comment to mean). Jazz has approached extended tertian harmony with a rigor and vocabulary that simply doesn't exist in traditional analysis, mainly because it hasn't needed to. Jazz composers, especially starting in the 60's and 70's with cats like Wayne Shorter and Chick Corea, have extrapolated upon these concepts of extended tertian harmony in ways that no classical composer ever did. Speaking of extended harmony, though, where is that in this article? 06:00, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jazz vs traditional

message: I believe that not only are certain harmonic ideas and formulas commonly and primarily in jazz, they are also described symbolically, and analyzed in a different way. The Maj7#11 chord is a perfect example of a description that would never be used in traditional harmony.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.18.121 (talk) 06:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Maj7#11

message: I have been reading the article over a few times as a complete beginner to music theory and it seems that there are a few points that need further explanation or links to the appropriate pages. Sections that would benefit from additional explanation as follows (bold indicating the term I think needs explaining):
*In a big-band context, the harmony is the basis for the writing for the horns, along with melodic counterpoint, etc.
*Open, modal harmony is characteristic of the music of McCoy Tyner, whereas rapidly shifting key centers is a hallmark of the middle period of John Coltrane's writing.
*When written in a jazz chart, these chords may have alterations specified in parentheses after the chord symbol.
I'm not sure that I'm in a good position to do either, because of my limited knowledge.Jimjamjak (talk) 14:22, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concepts requiring further explanation or links 

message: Do this article and Jazz chords  need to be separate?
1Z (talk) 14:28, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Something`s not right here.  Jazz theory  redirects to this article...apparently there is no article on jazz theory only harmony..nothing on melody or rhythm.  Jazz Rhythm  redirects to an article about a cartoon..there needs to be an article on jazz theory...theory and harmony are not the same thing..as I understand it harmony is only one aspect of music theory as is rhythm..I believe music teachers used to teach performance and harmony rather than performance and theory but harmony and theory are not really the same thing..the point being there needs to be a separate article on jazz theory. 97.82.196.11 (talk) 07:19, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

text: After reading the above article by Rictus I would think that would be a great place to start..I`m confused as to why there isn`t already an article on theory here unless there already was one that has somehow disappeared into cyber space..I thought that wasn`t supposed to happen since technology is infallible..just kidding..it`s probably carved in stone somewhere. 97.82.196.11 (talk) 15:01, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Tensions available for each chord must be spelled out as this is a central issue in jazz harmony. Especially tensions in chords of the melodic minor scale and the harmonic minor, as they are a frequent subject of confusion. 
In melodic minor, could the Im maj7 use the 9th, 11th, or/and 13th? What are the "not allowed notes" for each grade, and why?
--Tommy The Wise (talk) 14:50, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Available tensions 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jazz harmony. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081003022126/http://how-to-play-blues-guitar.com/jazz-theory/jazz-and-blues-stacking-3rds/ to http://how-to-play-blues-guitar.com/jazz-theory/jazz-and-blues-stacking-3rds/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified