Talk:Franco-Turkish War

message: I think it will be more suitable to title this article "Cilicia War" (despite that the conflicts had extended the traditionally perceived boundaries of Cilicia). The Turkish article refers to a Franco-Turkish front, not an all-out war. The war was waged by locally concentrated forces.
And even in Turkish, the more common definition is the "Southern front" (Güney cephesi). And the French term is "Cilicia War" (La guerre en Cilicie). A search for "Franco-Turkish War" (La guerre franco-turque) gives no hits. Under any viewpoint, naming a war in a way apparently never heard of by the principally concerned parties will look odd. Cretanforever 09:27, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: This article needs to be checked/rewritten to eliminate numerous grammatical errors and ambiguities.
Geoff Powers (talk) 13:39, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that. Some parts (e.g. Aftermath) are almost impossible to read. --Xeeron (talk) 17:40, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Copyedited on 9 March 2011. --Stfg (talk) 20:06, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ungrammatical English 

message: The edit war over the victory status for this conflict which focuses on the campaignbox needs to reach some endpoint short of locking this article from further edits.  I am not a historian, but a neutral party here.  The table below relates changes in the victory statement since article inception to just a few minutes ago.  I will take a look at the citations provided throughout the edit history and add a note about that in a bit. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:24, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring over victor 

message: * This source does not appear to recognize the Franco-Turkish War as being separate from the Turkish War of Independence: 
* This source suggests the conflict ended in concessions by both Turkey (economic) and France (land): 
--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:38, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Looking for additional references

message: I think that some users might confuse with "military victory" and "diplomatic victory". I want to remind the case of the Greco-Turkish War (1897). The Ottoman Empire won a military victory against the Kingdom of Greece. But the Treaty of Constantinople meaned Ottoman's loss.　We can say Savaşta kazandık fakat masada kaybettik. (We won war but lost on table) about this Ottoman's situation. About Franco-Turkish War, Ankara can say Savaşta kaybettik fakat masada kazandık (We lost war but won on table). The important is that no reliable source claims Turkish military victory. After Aintab (Antep) was fallen to the French Colonial Forces on 8 February 1921, there was no reportable "conduct of hostilities". From a military view point, I think "Small French vistory"Marko Djuranovic, Democracy Or Demography? Sources of Victory in Modern War, 2008, , p. 190. is suitable for this article. 
Takabeg (talk) 18:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: French military victory

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:25, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Armenian legion.png Nominated for Deletion