Talk:Eskayan language

message: Hello all,
If you are new to Eskayology please be aware that study of the Eskaya and the Eskayan language is controversial. For many of the statements made in this article on Eskayan there are alternative and frequently contradictory points of view. I urge any of you who have strong feelings about any particular matter to investigate whether the theory/opinion/counter-theory in question has been expressed before, the circumstances in which it was expressed and the research on which it depends. 
I have made every effort to make sure that statements in this article are backed up by reliable data but there will inevitably be errors and I welcome all corrections and fruitful collaborations. What I don't welcome are cut-and-paste jobs from google searches, and references to spurious sites. This is not research – please be considerate of the effort that others have made! I have attempted to catalogue all Eskaya source materials (of varying quality) between 1980 and 1993, listing all claims and counterclaims. This document will be made available shortly and hopefully it will allow you to do a quick check before hitting the edit button. 
Cheers,
Perezkelly 01:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A note on Eskaya controversies 

message: I have temporarily removed the Eskayan script images taken from Hector Santos' bibingka site. This was done for two reasons:
1. A citable source for these images cannot be established. They are part of a report on the Eskaya made by Jes Peralta some time in the late 1980s or early 1990s. The report is missing from both the National Museum archives in Manila and the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples. If anyone has a xerox of it somewhere please let me know!
2. Authorities in the Eskaya community have not granted permission for these symbols to be published on bibingka (or elsewhere). Getting permission is a fairly straightforward process but it is time-consuming. I am in the process of seeking permission at the moment.
Thanks,
Perezkelly 01:44, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They’re VERY slow responders, then. Nearly 13 years so far. Koro Neil (talk) 02:15, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eskayan script images 

message: Just to clarify, this comment above ("outraged historical linguist") was not intended literally but rather as a compliment to Dalubwika and to historical linguists generally. I am not a historical linguist myself so I can't claim to be outraged by wrong-footed classifications.
In earnest,
Perezkelly 12:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Outraged historical linguist

message: I am unconvinced that the Phoenician script has elements based on the human anatomy. If someone can verify this I will revert it. 
Perezkelly 01:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Phoenician script

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
* Consider adding more links to the article; per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and Wikipedia:Build the web, create links to relevant articles.[?]
* Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
* See if possible if there is a free use image that can go on the top right corner of this article.[?]
* There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Biography, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
* Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?]
* Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
* o Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant - “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
* Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, APR t 23:43, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:peerreview]] 

message: Can anyone help me identify more indigenous auxiliary languages (other than Damin)? Or even better, an analysis of the typology of auxiliary languages? I think this would provide relevant linguistic-anthropological context for the Eskayan situation.
Perezkelly 00:56, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Indigenous Auxiliary Languages

message: It has been said in the article, that lexical comparison had been done with Eskayan. And some results from a comparison of the Swadesh wordlist were given. This is particularly interesting from a project I'm working in. Can this Swadesh wordlist for Eskayan be obtained anywhere? Do you have a link or source? — N-true (talk) 13:46, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dictionary? 

message: i need immediate administrator assistance to stop all the moves from Eskayan to 
Eskayan script, also from Eskaya to Eskaya people as these are arbitrary moves and not a result of a series of discussions among the editors concerned...Pinay  (talk•email) 16:29, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[help needed]]

message: Why is this categorized under Cebuano languagge? I know Eskayans speak Cebuano, but thats like Chinese americans speaking English. --Jondel (talk) 12:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cebuano language

message: I notice that a number of edits by Kwamikagami in February this year cite my article in TAJA but have misinterpreted the analysis. This is annoying for me because it makes me look like I am taking a position that I do not subscribe to. It also makes me think that it's time to thoroughly revise this Wikipedia entry to make it consistent with the latest published research on Eskayan. This will take some time but I welcome anybody who wishes to help, especially those with expertise in Philippine anthropology/linguistics. I refer you to 'A note on Eskaya controversies' above. If you want a copy of the document that assesses claims and counterclaims, please get in touch Perezkelly (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:09, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Thorough revision

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Eskayan language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121022120418/http://www.ling.hawaii.edu/ldtc/languages/eskaya/Translation%202.html to http://www.ling.hawaii.edu/ldtc/languages/eskaya/Translation%202.html
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.ling.hawaii.edu/ldtc/languages/eskaya/BoholHymn.mp3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eskayan language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090908085206/http://www.bibingka.com/dahon/mystery/silver2.htm to http://www.bibingka.com/dahon/mystery/silver2.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :
So Eskayan vocabulary was borrowed from Eskayan?? Or, as the next section suggests, invented arbitrarily? —Tamfang (talk) 22:46, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that whoever wrote that meant the latter. Eskayan vocabulary seems invented, with a lot of inspiration from Spanish.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 01:05, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  by its own bootstraps 

message: There should be a version of Wikipedia in Eskayan script.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.28.74.68 (talk) 10:46, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eskayan Wikipedia 

message: The English translation is very inaccurate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 01:03, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text section