lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Market risk

message: I am not sure where this conclusive list of market risk factors come from. Quote needed. And I clearly disagree. Depending on the structure of a product, anything which is either traded on a market (stock or bond prices, FX) or derived from the prices of something traded on a market (interest rates, volas, ...) may represent a market risk. Thobitz (talk) 19:34, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that 'list' is problematic too. I have reworded the intro and also added a proper, recognised definition. Furthermost (talk) 00:33, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Anyone could explain clearly what is the difference between Market risk and systemic risk? They seem to be exactly the same thing to me but two different articles exist... Why? --Bombastus 11:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systemic risk 

message: The article claims there are five standard market risk factors, but only four are listed. Either one is missing or the number must be wrong. Corrective?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.24.247 (talk) 17:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  market risk factors 

message: This article had red links to Variance Covariance. Obviously those are inappropriate capitals. One of them said this:
: Variance Covariance matrix.
The tiniest amount of common sense would make it obvious that for many years Wikipedia has had an article titled covariance matrix and a redirect to that article from variance-covariance matrix (with a hypen) and variance–covariance matrix (with an en-dash), and yet somehow someone failed to suspect that an obviously incorrect way of writing it would explain the red links.
: 
Could some common sense be applied here. Michael Hardy (talk) 16:18, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not All Word Must Begin With A CAPITAL Letter!!
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Gzornenplatz/Proposed decision

message: Presumably the ArbCom have asked Jimbo whether or not he has actually banned Wik/Gzornenplatz. It would be useful if the ArbCom would publish Jimbo's reply, jguk 21:05, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of previous ban?

message: Presumably the ArbCom have asked Jimbo whether or not he has actually banned Wik/Gzornenplatz. It would be useful if the ArbCom would publish Jimbo's reply, jguk 21:05, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of previous ban?
Talk:Trini Lopez

message: All the Reprise albums through 68 which charted should have their own articles.(mercurywoodrose)75.61.142.156 (talk) 02:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Albums

message: Support split - Discography section takes up more than one third of the page, and should be split to a new article entitled Trini Lopez discography. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:10, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging  please reintroduce this discussion in a relevant WikiProject. Or if its any use, I agree with your proposal. Feel free to start split if you consider additional consensus unnecessary. A. C. Santacruz  ⁂  Talk 10:02, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trini Lopez discography 

message: A lot of the other sources say that he was born on May 15, 1937.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.122.216.158 (talk) 13:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth 

message: Did he write any of his own songs? What was his own hit? 101.108.8.64 (talk) 15:08, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You can find information about Lopez's own songs through Secondhandsongs.com, here: . However, their lists are generally incomplete, so it should not be counted as definitive.--MarshalN20 ✉🕊 22:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only cover versions of songs 

message: Of course, non-Spanish speaking people have no obligation of knowing Spanish language's accentuation rules. But anyway it should be noted that, being "López" a Hispanic last name, it should be written with an accent mark on the "o". Its absence makes the word sound as if it were an oxytone word, but it's a paroxytone one. Alvabass (talk) 04:57, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The truth is that "Lopez" in English is altogether pronounced differently than in Spanish (particularly the first vowel). Most sources (in English) that write about Lopez do not use the accent mark.--MarshalN20 ✉🕊 23:41, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last name's spelling 

message: The New York Times incorrectly stated that his birthday was on May 13 when it is really May 15.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.122.216.158 (talk) 08:00, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth II
Talk:Carcharodontosaurus

message: The fossils described by Stromer were destroyed in 1944 during World War II
I imagine a bomb dropping on a remote location, which seems far-fetched.  The Article would be improved if some additional details could be added.  Leaving them out makes it more of a stumbling block and reduces readability.107.195.106.201 (talk) 03:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The fossils were housed in a museum in Bonn that was destroyed by Allied bombers during World War II, the same museum that housed the holotype of Spinosaurus.--Mr Fink (talk) 04:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Destroyed" ... How?  Why?  By whom?
Talk:Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction

message: The word “recronstruction” appears in the article. Likely a typo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.111.143.106 (talk) 05:47, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing this out. Next time you see a spelling error, feel free to edit the article yourself - that's how I got started at Wikipedia, ten years ago now. -- John of Reading (talk) 06:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo 

message: Any chance of getting an image or diagram of the surgery? There are many that pop up on a Google search. Assambrew (talk) 01:37, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We can only use an image uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Just checked - nothing there for the surgery. Zefr (talk) 02:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a diagram
Talk:Mutant Enemy Productions

message: Didn't Joss disban the company?
I heard it was used as a tax shelter?
Any info?--69.228.97.109 03:45, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I seem to recall that after the "Hush" episode, the monster didn't say anything.  Can anyone confirm this? Aumakua 21:31, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Monster speech

message: Not sure who keeps putting Serenity back on the list, but it wasn't a Mutant Enemy production. It was a Barry Mendel production for Universal Pictures. I get that people want it here because it was Joss Whedon's movie, but then put it as a footnote which explains why it isn't in the actual list. Either this is a list of actual Mutant Enemy, Inc. productions or it isn't. One would think that if it's meant to be an accurate entry, it should be an accuate list. If so, ditch Serenity. Theonetruebix (talk) 19:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serenity 

message: I removed Five Nights as one of the productions for Mutant Enemy since I've never heard of this project and there was no source link for it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.132.8.88 (talk) 19:51, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Five Nights 

message: Here are some links I found to hopefully help with notability:
Logo/Typewriter/Credits -- https://www.denofgeek.com/tv/tv-production-companies/36515/the-stories-behind-tv-production-company-closing-logos  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KirstynF (talk • contribs) 04:16, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: The old logo should be kept on the page. It was notable in its own right, being featured in multiple other cultural works, cited and discussed in media outlets, etc. A substantial portion of the article is dedicated to it, so it still belongs here. Jbbdude (talk) 04:04, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: A second IP user, from the same block of IPs (IPv6s registered to Comcast for Seattle with the same first 64 bits/network prefix/subnet prefix/site prefix and subnet ID), has edited the article to again remove the notable old logo. I'm not sure why. If any user has a view on removing the logo, they should discuss it here rather than engage in an edit war. Jbbdude (talk) 22:18, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old logo
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-01-31/Arbitration report

message: "chair-apparent"....heh, nice one.  I laughed, anyway. :-)  Thanks for the detailed and wryly (or perhaps dryly) humorous notes -- you keep Wikipedia fun. Jwrosenzweig 22:15, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I was rather proud of that one, yes. --Michael Snow 22:26, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Aralar

message: Hello.   I was going to add the link to Spain-stubs, but it appears to have been immediately deleted.  There is a Spain-geo-stub, but no Spain-stub and no Basque-stub.  Any thoughts on this? Andrew Watt 22:32, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes: let's create Basque stubs! --Sugaar 20:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Zutik" is not the internal organ of ETA. That's "Zutabe". "Zutik" is a leftist and basque-nationalist political party which is not related with terrorism or violent actions. Zutik went together with Aralar in a coalition for the spanish general elections in 2004, gaining 38.560/ 3.09% of the Basque Country's votes. In 2005, in the Basque parlamient elections, Zutik didn't take part in the elections, what in fact was interpreted as a technical support to Aralar, which finally gained 2,5% of total votes and one representative for Gipuzkoa's electoral district.
Aralar is also a mountan range very dear to the hearts of the Basque People.
:Yes, this needs disambiguation and the creation of an entry on Aralar mountain range and possibly also Aralar sanctuary, after all this party is just named after the mountain.
::I've created a disambiguation page, hope I did it right, I've never done one for an existing page before. Akerbeltz (talk) 12:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake
Talk:Ability Photopaint

message: Does this page contain any information not on Ability Office?  Will it in the future?  Can we make it a redirect until someone wants to write a full article on each of the components of Ability Office? Ojw 22:48, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:William Hall (VC)

message: There are conflicting versions of both but I have given the most reliable and explained the source in footnotes.Letterofmarque (talk) 20:57, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting date of birth and middle name 
Talk:Predicate transformer semantics

message: A more in-depth discussion of if and do is required, as well as nondeterminism.  Also, an example of how to use predicate transformers to derive a non-trivial algorithm might be good, as long as it doesn't conflict with policy.  Also, the references section could use some filling out, specifically to the Gries' and Backhous' newer books on the subject.  The relationship to predicate calculus could also be filled out.
--jayinbmore 23:58, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Have merged wlp into this article, as suggested in that article, but it could do with more detail PJTraill (talk) 18:14, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

message: The link of "predicate" to Assertion (computing) is rather unhelpful, but the article Predicate (mathematical logic), though more relevant is a mess, and perhaps not much more helpful. Can somebody do better? PJTraill (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to ''Assertion (computing)'' 

message: The mathematical interpretation of several expressions is rather inobvious, for example  sp(x := E, R)\ =\ \exists y, x=E[x \leftarrow y] \wedge R[x \leftarrow y]. Is the right-hand-side  a formula? Then why not use parenthesis or words, such as follows?
 sp(x := E, R) is the formula \exists y \mbox{ s.t. } x=E[x \leftarrow y] \land R[x \leftarrow y]
I ask because I'm not certain I understand the formula as originally formatted. Diggory Hardy (talk) 17:48, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expressions 

message: Currently, only the total correctness rule for while is provided. The rule is (unavoidably) complex, and unfortunately obscures the essence of the weakest precondition semantics of while. Newcomers in particular will be scared away perhaps never to look at weakest preconditions again. If we remove the termination requirement, a much simpler rule emerges for the weakest liberal precondition, which I denote wlp
wlp(\textbf{while}\ E\ \textbf{do}\ S\ \textbf{done}, R)\ =\ 
            I \wedge\ ((E \wedge I) \Rightarrow wp(S,I)) \wedge\ ((\neg E \wedge I) \Rightarrow R)
 \
which simplifies even further to 
wlp(\textbf{while}\ E\ \textbf{do}\ S\ \textbf{done}, R)\ =\ 
            I \wedge\ (E \Rightarrow wp(S,I)) \wedge\ (\neg E \Rightarrow R)
 \
This simply states that the invariant must always hold and additionally the invariant and guard taken together be strong enough to establish the postcondition, and at the end of the loop when the loop guard is false it together with the invariant should be able to establish the required postcondition.
If no one has any objections I will make the change to the page
Houseofwealth (talk) 00:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The While case needs a partial correctness rule 

message: Also a slightly better motivation for weakest preconditions could be given. Something along the lines of:
Given a program that needs to satisfy some condition when it has finished executing, what are the minimum conditions that need to hold prior to the program execution to ensure this?
Houseofwealth (talk) 01:12, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stongest postconditions are missing a motivation
Talk:Peutz–Jeghers syndrome

message: Different sourced websites I've found recently present conflicting data on mortality and morbidity rates. I added the eMedicine link data to the page. But another recently updated article, on GeneReviews, lists three or four different sources of mortality/morbidity information, and they all seem to speak of a 'much more favorable' prognosis than the eMedicine article does. If anyone could provide insight or info on the more accurate statistics, that would be great! I'd like to know how long I might live (LOL) Peoplesunionpro 18:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mortality/morbidity 

message: Hi
Where does the recommendation for mammography screening come from? It looks entirely wrong to me. Younger women should be examined more frequently than older because cancer growth rate is higher in young age.
--Enro2002 (talk) 13:54, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mammography
Talk:Deficit hawk

message: This article is nowhere near netural. Someone should edit the page to restore a non-biased point of view. --75.36.32.196 (talk) 19:37, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Moodna Viaduct

message: How many track?
Tabletop 00:44, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One track but in the Erie Railroad era it was guantleted [two tracks within a 1.25 track wide profile - switches at both ends]. Yes possible to walk but the MTA police patrol a lot around the times trains are due through the area. FullScale4Me (talk) 03:47, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  tracks
Talk:Marrowstone, Washington

message: Thanks for the help in editing, jwrosenzweig. I'm trying to familiarize myself with editing pages and thought I'd start with home little home island.
The Seattle Youth Symphony has a summer program called Marrowstone that's been around since 1943, apparently. It's held at Western Washington University in Bellingham nowadays, but does anybody happen to know if the Marrowstone Music Festival gets its name from this place? If the camp was originally held here, it would be a worthwhile piece of information to add. --Michael Snow 22:12, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lunar node

message: The lunar node in astrology was a potential copyright vio from 
. I have removed it. If you want to rewrite the article, or think this do so at Moon's nodes (astrology)Squiquifox 00:53, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :If one tracks the Moon in the sky on a continuous basis, one will notice its declination (celestial latitude) oscillates regularly between extreme values. Every half-synodical month (about 27 times per year), the Moon reaches a maximum of minimum declination value. This is called a standstill (the word has the same meaning as the "-stice" part of "solstice").
:Because the Moon's orbit maintains a relatively constant inclination with respect to the ecliptic but precesses rather quickly about the ecliptic pole (completing a cycle in a little less than 19 years), the declination it can reach in the sky varies accordingly between limits of about 28.59° and 18.29°. This affects strongly the azimuth of moonrise and moonset. If an observer tracks the position on his horizon of successive moonrises, for example, it will appear to travel north, reach some maximum value, then travel south, reach a minimum value, and then head north again, over a period of nearly 19 years. When the Moon is nearing its maximum declination or moonrise/set azimuth, it will appear to rise or set in the same spot several nights in a row —this is the major standstill. When the Moon nears the minimum declination or moonrise/set azimuth, the same phenomenon occurs, and is dubbed the minor standstill. Prehistoric astronomers knew about this phenomenon and kept track of it.
:More information on lunar standstills can be found  here.
I removed that, thou wellwritten, because there is indeed no interrelationship to nodal, but to siderial period--W!B: 18:09, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standstills 

message: Tom, yes you are right about the phase at the extremes.  I must have been mesmerized by viewing the latest (almost) full moon.  Regards,  --Dennis Noson   216.254.24.172 17:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moon phase at extremes 

message: The picture shows the constellations Ursa Major (Great Bear / Big Dipper) and Ursa Minor (Little Bear), which are not on the ecliptic. Therefore the dragon on the picture is not the two nodes but the constellation Draco (dragon). Curryfranke (talk) 14:23, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Picture 

message: I read on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_node :
"Since the orbital plane of the Moon precesses in space, the lunar nodes also precess around the ecliptic, completing one revolution (called a draconic or nodal period) in 18.612958 years (6,798.383 days). (Note that this is not the same length as a saros.) "
The length of Saros is 18.03 years NOT 18.61 years.
Sources: any serious astronomy book and https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saros 
J-P Lacroix
jpl@ancientcartography.net  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2788:556:C6:98B7:BB17:F735:9D14 (talk) 21:44, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lunar node
Talk:Gulf War/Archive 2

message: 34 nations (to agree with our own sources below; wonder what the discrepancy is)) 
:: Hmm, not sure. Although the 32 came from an article that seemed slightly slanted against the 1991 gulf war, so they were probably being unusually picky about which countries to include in the coalition. Guess I should have checked a couple of different sources. 34's probably correct.
Does Canada's involvement warrant such a large section, whereas no other non-US nation was cited? David.Monniaux
:This is one of those issues that comes up in Wikipedia.  The information on Canada is extremely useful, I think. It makes for an unbalanced article, but it's better to retain this imbalance and work to improve it by adding other countries' involvements.  If they get too numerous or too large, we can isolate them in separate articles like: Canada and the Vietnam War.  DanKeshet 18:38, Apr 21, 2004 (UTC)
*I think the section should be retitled (Individual nations contributions?), with Canada as a subsection - giving the clear indication that details on other nations will soon follow (e.g. UK, Germany, France, etc). The current format gives the impression that Canada was in some way 'special', and having 34 sections might make things look rather unbalanced Average Earthman 11:40, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Nations involved

message: Here is the relevant text from the Wash Post, Aug 19, 1990:
:Kuwait's foreign minister, Sabah Ahmed Sabah, fainted at the Arab summit in Cairo last week when his Iraqi counterpart, Tariq Aziz, threatened to disclose the contents of conversations and documents revealing communication between the Kuwaiti minister's office and the Central Intelligence Agency about how to deal with Iraq, according to a number of sources who attended the Cairo meeting.
Thank you, Lexis-Nexis. I hope this at least supports the authenticity of the account. Other references can be provided if necessary... Graft 22:29, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: William Blum

message: I will try unprotecting this page, given this latest request.  I think that there is a chance that the edit war will resume, though. If so, I should restore the protection, or another admin should do so-- whichever comes first. 172 06:18, 19 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Unprotecting

message: :"and demonstrations in the United States were often overwhelmed by people protesting the protesters"
This may have happened somewhere--I don't know--but it was not the norm.  See  and  for some discussion of the protests.  Also, I am  going to remove "but never reached the size..." because it's misleading.  Protests against the Gulf War were larger by many orders of magnitude than protests against the Vietnam War at comparable stages in the war.  The Gulf War simply did not last as long. DanKeshet 19:23, Oct 8, 2004 (UTC)
:It definitely did not have the same level of unpopularity as Vietnam, at least in the U.S. Trey Stone 15:58, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  overwhelmed by counterprotesters
Talk:Where Angels Fear to Tread

message: A comment was made in the edit summaries: "I wonder why/if that change in layout was necessary."  Why, I thought it would read and look better if I changed it. :-) Jihg 01:17, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC)
A great novel I just have to say. The title alone drew me to it. Moonbada (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 01:38, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Removed all film references from here as there is a separate article for the film. SkierRMH 05:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Film
Talk:Pope Clement XII

message: *Did Pope Clement ever have kids? He was an ancestor of mine, and i am curious as to if he was a direct ancestor or not. Anybody input for this would be greatly appreciatd! I knew about his existence before now, but to tell the truth wasn't entirely sure that he really did exist.
*I found this stray external link in the middle of the article.  --Gerald Farinas 15:12, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I need help to clean up this article for disambiguation link. I know nothing of this Pope. In the 1st and 9th section of this article thre is a reference to a Cardinal Albani, however there was two, one link to a dismbiguation page, the other is a red link. Can somebody please correct these.Angelbo 05:41, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation clean up

message: belongs to Clemens XII (I believe that it depicts Clemens XIII)--85.0.78.185 21:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  are you sure that the photo...