Talk:Command & Conquer: Tiberian Sun

message: This article contains at least variations of spelling for "Tacticus". The correct one is probably the one which matches the Roman Emperor, but someone needs to check with a canonical source (i.e. Westwood).
*I would like a screenshot. Jamhaw 19:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old stuff 

message: Just to note, the buildings list is very long, but as i don't know much about the game, could someone else please reduce it in size? NeoNerd 15:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the list attempts to be complete, in which case it seems to be reduced to a minimal size. Sarah 11:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Im gonna remove it. This is game-manual material, not encyclopedia material. I don't think Wikipedia needs an all-inclusive game tech tree. -- saberwyn 04:28, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List

message: "In fact this was what the game was originally intended to be but the idea was scrapped meaning the project had to be pushed back and the game ended up being a real-time strategy game like the rest of the series."
I don't believe this? Can anyone confirm this? 81.109.94.62 18:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Watch Tiberian Dawn's teasers. Mikael GRizzly 20:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Just my $0.02. --Special Operative MACAVITYDebrief me 16:00, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Originally an FPS?

message: Why is this article written from the Nod point of view? The GDI campaign is considered canon, and there can't be any sequels without the GDI winning, otherwise the storyline of the sequels doesn't make sense--193.120.116.178 (talk) 16:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this written from the Nod point of view? 

message: :Image:TSFirestormbox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TSFirestormbox.jpg

message: Someone should add this; it's written by the producer and allows a behind-the-scenes perspective on production and reception. ZeaLitY [ DREAM - REFLECT ] 11:16, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great source for the article 

message: 'As of February 12, 2010, Electronic Arts (EA) licensed Tiberian Sun and its expansion pack Firestorm freeware, thus making it possible to be distributed and downloaded free of charge. The game was initially available for download from EA's website in order to promote their latest game in Command & Conquer series.'
Where's the reference for this? Does it legally hold true that this is free software? For instance, someone could make software available for free for a short period of time, then again sell it on the market. Are the people still allowed to supply that piece of software via torrents or download from a web page?
Nevertheless, it needs a reference ideally to the statement anyway.
Aetas volat. (talk) 16:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiberian Sun's status as free software 

message: Why am I continuing to be reverted? Per WP:SEEALSO, if significant content within the see also section is also located in the navbox, then it can/should be removed... --Izno (talk) 20:38, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversions of see also 

message: Just some cleanup suggestions:
Is it possible to change the way system requirements is to bullet points?
Makes it simpler to read. Otherwise, no biggie. Cheers
--Chiekken (talk) 06:02, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 28 December 2011 

message: Has anyone else noticed some weirdly specific links in this article? I'm mainly wondering about the links in the introduction that goes to articles about the anti-globalization movement and the 27th G8 summit. What does that have to do with Command & Conquer? 83.249.141.28 (talk) 20:18, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed much of the lead. There's no reason to go into the detail about Nod there... --Izno (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird links 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Command & Conquer: Tiberian Sun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090301014725/http://www.gamespot.com:80/pc/strategy/commandconquertiberiansun/index.html to http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/commandconquertiberiansun/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:31, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I think the article should include a section about the major mod known under this name, which replicates "Tiberian Dawn" and "Red Alert 1" using the advanced engine of "Tiberian Sun". Or there should be a dedicated wiki article about it. -- Alexey Topol (talk) 02:43, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Dawn of the Tiberian Age 

message: I mean, it's not crucial to keep the article for the base game separate from that of its expansion (hypothetically speaking on the latter), but I feel it should be done for the sake of including otherwise ommitted information. Thoughts? 81.226.7.118 (talk) 00:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Firestorm as a separate article; yay or nay?