lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of WWE personnel

message: Carmelo Hayes is on SmackDown now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.246.112.84 (talk) 09:20, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

message: Trish Stratus is not an active member of the roster. Can she be taken off JBeeSzabs (talk) 15:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 15:26, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 January 2024 

message: The confusion comes from his full name being Sean Tan Li Hao. Naming conventions as a Singaporean Chinese are <first name> <family name/last name> <Chinese name>, so Tan is his family name/last name and Li Hao being his Chinese name.
In fact, the Ringside News article used as a reference now correctly refers to him as Sean Tan. 103.6.150.239 (talk) 18:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  NXT's Dante Chen's real name is Sean Tan 

message: Ventrelle was released today so he should be removed from this page. 
source: https://www.f4wonline.com/news/wwe/evp-of-talent-dan-ventrelle-no-longer-with-wwe 207.244.221.54 (talk) 01:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Dan Ventrelle  

message: WWE NXT Men's and Women's Division personnel roster added Carlee Bright and Kendal Grey. WWE NXT Men's Division added Dion Lennox,Je'von Evans, Keanu Carver,Tyson Dupont,Tyriek Igwe and Kale Dixon. 184.55.243.67 (talk) 06:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWE NXT Men's and Women's Division 

message: change all "Pay-per-views" to "Premium Live events" as it is no longer called that way. 110.44.119.202 (talk) 08:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Consensus is to use "pay-per-view" as it is the more common term; "premium live event" is a marketing term. — Czello (music) 08:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 April 2024 

message: Given that John Cena primarily appears on Smackdown whenever he does make an appearance, shouldn't he be listed on the Smackdown roster? He's not even listed on this entire page, including the non-assigned personnel section, even though he's still contracted by WWE! 181.188.59.230 (talk) 06:52, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I can't see John Cena 

message: Saquon Shugars real name is Copeland Barbee as seen on his ultrasound so please change his real name from unknown to Copeland Barbee https://x.com/saquonoffwwe/status/1775601469644825006?s=46&t=HhC8pU5XwffZef_UHAtffQ 2001:8003:946B:6001:9C90:350D:C939:25CA (talk) 16:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Charliehdb (talk) 09:55, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2024
Talk:Santiago Creel

message: I have removed the sentence, "Another of his daughters, María Creel Garza Ríos, declared that she has joined his 2012 campaign for the PAN Presidential Nomination". The article cited states that she had accompanied him during a leg of his campaign, which is trivial. The above language incorrectly implies through her "decleration" that she was somehow politically involved in the campaign. This is a loss of meaning in translation as the cited article was in Spanish. Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chvg (talk • contribs) 17:39, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Family Life

message: I am not sure if we should  label the National Action Party as "Christian Democratic" in articles such as this one. Obviously, I am open to suggestions, but here are my objections:
* Christian Democracy is a rather narrow political ideology which is not entirely consistent with the PAN. For example, the PAN does not advocate less taxes; on the contrary, it is is the only party in Congress advocating more taxes. In addition, several initiatives, such as the seguro popular, are not expected from the Christian Democrats.
* Most casual readers are not that into politics. They may think that "the Christian Democratic National Action Party" is, in fact, the name of the political party; or that Santiago Creel considers himself a Christian democrat, etc. In my opinion, adjectives such as conservative, leftist, right-winger, etc. are easier to swallow. 
* Last, but not least, because someone may argue that if the PAN candidates are gonna be labelled as CDs, then the PRI politicians can be labelled as socialist (!) since the party belongs to the Internationale Socaliste, which is just... well, bizarre.
So, in short, the PAN is 80-90% CD and it should be stressed in its own article, but I don't think we should bring those labels to the bios. Ruiz 01:24, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
:Well, the fact that the PAN is a member of the CD parties says quite a bit. They have called themselves "right-of-center" (perhaps because of the negative stigma of the extreme right or to appeal to a wider audience in Mexico), but the reality is that their policies are much conservative than what a "middle-of-the-road" party usually is. The recent campain and positions against the morning-after pill is an example. Every other party calls them a "right-wing" party and the party has traditionally attracted devout Catholics. This is the list of the members of the Christian Democratic Organization and you can find the PAN there. --Vizcarra 18:08, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Christian Democratic
Talk:List of Gentlemen v Players matches

message: I've included the two 1806 games in this list despite the traditional date for the start of first-class cricket being 1815, since it makes reference easier given that CricketArchive lists the two early matches as first class, presumably following the lead of the ACS&H. See Talk:First-class cricket for some discussion of what constitutes a first-class game. Loganberry (Talk) 01:31, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

message: This should have a category, but I'm not sure which. English cricket, perhaps? Or Sports related lists? Sam Vimes 20:28, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Personally I think we could easily find enough material eventually to justify a specific "Cricket lists" category, but that doesn't exist (yet). "Cricket records and statistics" is a possibility, but I'm putting the actual records on the main Gentlemen v Players page. Maybe "History of cricket" as well. "Category: English cricket" doesn't seem to exist anyway, though. Loganberry (Talk) 20:47, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Category:English cricket doesn't exist? It's a subcat of :Category:Cricketing nations, which may be why you missed it... Sam Vimes 21:00, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops! Yep, that'd be it. I think I'll put it in there for now, and if anyone feels like adding the others then they can. Loganberry (Talk) 21:42, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: Is this still a stub? It's complete by now, isn't it? Sam Vimes | Address me 17:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub
Talk:Luigi Orione

message: I was about to link the term, but discovered that the article we have called oratory, doesn’t really cover it in the sense used here. I think that it would be useful to have such an article—even a short one—but I’m really not competent even to produce a stub. Perhaps someone reading this can write something? —Ian Spackman 22:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What an ‘oratory’ is. 
Talk:Gravitational shift

message: Actually, I see nothing here worth saving at present, but merging seems the most convenient way of getting rid of this.
ErkDemon, did you check for a prior article on gravitational redshift before starting this stub?  Or were you starting on an extensive revision?  (That's a guess from your to be continued?...)  If so, especially given that some editors including myself feel that, while you often have something worth saying, your articles tend to be WP:NPOV (due to overemphasis of a certain point of view), a better procedure would be to creat the article in your personal sandbox (in your user pages), then add a note in the talk page proposing to replace the current version with your own.  (Or better, in most cases, to let a neutral party merge the two.)---CH 05:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Redundancy theory of truth

message: Two questions. First, in ordinary language philosphy are "Snow is white" and "Snow is white is true" the same? I think that in linguistic pragmatics, which I recognize is not the subject of this article, the two statements are different. The first simply states a fact, the second implies re-assertion or assertion in the face of a perceived doubter. They also differ in the temporal focus of a likely listenter. The first states an obvious fact, and the listener focuses on what comes next after this statement; she expects this to be a building block in a developing conversation. The second states an obvious fact, but the listener focuses on what must have happened earlier in the conversation to lead the speaker to make an emphatic (re-)statement of an obvious fact; he expects that for some reason, this apparently obvious, indubitable fact has become doubted.
Second, would it make sense to make some reference to the way ordinary language philosophy differs (might differ?) from other branches on this issue of disquotationality/redundancy? I certainly am not up to the task, but my thoughts on this might encourage someone who's qualified to do so. Interlingua 15:11, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ordinary Language Philosophy

message: Opening paragraph uses this without explanation.
212.159.103.66 21:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a "redundant theorist"? 

message: √2 is a ratio of two integers. 
<refer to proof of your choice which demonstrates that proposition leads to contradiction> 
So, what does it mean to claim that is exactly equivalent to my asserting that " '√2 is a ratio of two integers.' is True." I have asserted the former, but NEVER have asserted the latter (it is, in fact, False, as you doubtless apprehend).
Snow is white? Not if the light isn't white (or near white). Ice crystals (of sufficient purity) are colorless. The surfaces between snowflakes scatter light, so snow reflects the color of the ambient light, which is generally perceived as white. But I digress. Asserting a false preposition as part of a conditional argument needs to be addressed. Generally, expressing "P is true" means not only that I believe P is true, but that I believe I can prove P is true or that I have already demonstrated to my own satisfaction that I am correct in believing P is true. Given that Homo Sapiens Sapiens should be characterized as having the fundamental characteristic (observe any child (or adult)) of being liars much of the time, not discussing how this subject relates to either conditionally true statements or outright lies is a gross omission. But perhaps the latter is outside the scope of this subject...173.189.79.42 (talk) 22:07, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't understand this.
Talk:Granita (restaurant)

message: Could someone help me understand why this is worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia?   It seems to me that every piece of information here belongs in Tony Blair or dozens of other British politics articles; the restaurant seems to have no signifcance outside of one historic event. - PhilipR 02:16, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is also an article Blair-Brown deal.  I've added a link to it for now but it would be better to merge the articles under that name.  Granita is handy shorthand for the deal so we should keep a link in case people search for the term without quite knowing to what it refers. --Cavrdg 10:21, 1 August 2005 (UTC)

text: That's just silly.   Removed. Mark1 21:55, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I've removed everything that merely duplicates the Blair-Brown deal article. Grover cleveland 14:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Morning coat

message: Is "cutaway" for "morning coat" exclusively an American usage? PKM 02:17, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cutaway

message: This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified. 
By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability and making them seem less credible. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubbified. 
If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 04:33, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-stubbed 

message: I might have totally wrong, but aren't these two the same thing? If not, it might be useful to add better specifications to both articles, because it's rather easy to get confused. Morning coat, morning suit and morning jacket all redirect to the same page, but why is morning dress different? The articles even have the same images...
--88.114.242.125 (talk) 06:00, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Morning coat]] = [[Morning dress]]?
Talk:AMD K8

message: I think we should redirect this to Athlon64.  Any takers?the1physicist 02:34, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  The K8 is used in a number of processors, only one of which is the Athlon 64.  --Doradus 13:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm going to change this redirect back into a stub unless there are objections.  --Doradus 14:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Reply.  PLEASE DO change this redirection back to a stub.  In fact lets fill it out properly as the K8 microarchitecture.  It is really stupid that K8 redirects to Athlon64 when it is the Opteron processor that first brought out K8 (on 21-April-2003).  Athlon64 based K8's did not come out until much later.  Not to mention Turion which is also based on the K8 uArch. --Dr unix (talk) 02:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I also agree that this should have its own article. This previous revision might be a good starting point for a stub. Letdorf (talk) 14:46, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  K8 is not the same as Athlon 64 

message: :File:AMD Athlon64.png is non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at :File:AMD Athlon64.png. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 10:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-free file problems with [[:File:AMD Athlon64.png]]
Talk:Stacy London

message: This is subjective, I know, but that photo isn't very flattering (though the cut of the dress is fabulous). If another comes along that is better, would it be attached here automatically or would an editor with an interest in the subject have to keep re-checking for one? Thanks for the answer, Wordreader (talk) 01:58, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think she looks good but to answer your question, no, it would not be attached automatically. An editor would have to find an image with a "free" license (CC BY and CC BY-SA are the most common), upload that image to the commons, and then edit this article to replace the current image with the new one they found. // Gbern3 (talk) 00:27, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I agree, that photo makes Stacy London look horrible.  Can we get a better one?  Stacy London is fucking hot!  OH MY GOD! Herzlicheboy (talk) 04:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:French Institute of Pondicherry

message: Note:  Project Banner with Puducherry workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Puducherry or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 09:44, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Puducherry Addition
Talk:E.163

message: I reverted this article to its previous state, before it became a redirect.  E.164, while a revision of E. 163, isn't the same thing, and makes no referance to this prior version of the standard.  If anyone feels this should become a redirect once more, please leave comments. 4.248.249.141 02:43, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert from redirect
Talk:Crioulo (horse)

message: This breed seems to be the same as Criollo (horse). Someone please either confirm that they are different, or merge the articles. Jorge Stolfi 23:43, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  They seem to be the same breed, and should be merged.Morgana 11:52, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Criollo (horse)]]?

message: The word "crioulo" is indeed the Portuguese cognate of the English word "creole". What happens is that within the Portuguese speakers the meaning may be slightly different (check the meaning in Cape Verde and the meaning in Brazil) TenIslands 12:52, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Portuguese cognate
Talk:Chi

message: Shouldn't the Chi of Taoist Fifth Force be contained within the first general bullet of "asian life force?" Especially since they both link to Qi? Mrcolj 16:54, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Taoist Fifth Force

message: Should "traditional chinese medicine" be "traditional medicine" here, or "traditional eastern medicine?"  I mean, most global traditional medicines use the concept of chi, and definitely 100% of those from Asia. Mrcolj 16:54, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Traditional "Chinese" Medicine

message: The bit about the lost land is at least partially fake. It also lists Friesland, a province of The Netherlands which is in no way lost, but often ridiculed. I must admit I laughed at it, being from Friesland myself. I decided to be bold enough to delete this silly reference. 130.89.235.19 (talk) 23:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chi lost land 

message: Chi is a village in Mon District, Nagaland in India. Samnokforyou (talk) 13:05, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chi
Talk:Tassos Papadopoulos

message: First of all, I'm not Greek, I'm Cypriot. If you want to qualify that with "Greek Cypriot", fine. But I try my best to avoid any POV statements.
Secondly, I could argue that a simple "TRNC" (in quotes) communicates the same meaning as the rather more complicated "the de facto (but not de jure) state that is the TRNC". Someone who doesn't know what the terms "de facto" and "de jure" mean (and I'm sure there's many people that don't, especially when used in this context) would have to look them up. In addition, the general definition of de facto at the top of the page suggests that it means something that's generally accepted (even if it's not legally true), which is certainly not the case here. Sometimes we need to consider brevity and ease of comprehension as well as the accuracy of the description. Otherwise, we could replace all instances of the word TRNC with something like "the area occupied by Turkish armed forces and controlled by a de facto Turkish Cypriot administration that has no legal international recognition". That, of course, would be ridiculous. 
So I'm willing to agree to calling it "TRNC", but if we don't qualify this name with quotes (or some other simple way) then there is a connotation of legitimacy that I believe is wrong. Yes, it's true that I'm particularly interested in this issue because I'm a Greek Cypriot. But I'm willing to find a compromise and my goal is to avoid POV and describe this complicated issue in a way that reflects reality as simply as possible. Csymeonides 10:26, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Only a traitor would consider himself 'Cypriot', Cyprus is part of Greece in all but name, we speak Greek, we eat Greek, we live Greek - We are therefore, Greek. Those who choose to ignore our past will be dealt with harshly when we get a good Government in Greece like the Golden Dawn.--GreekWarrior 20:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: GreekWarrior, what rubbish! Did you know we Greek Cypriots have DNA closer to that of the Turkish Cypriots than that of Greeks? You're a fool - only a traitor would deny his/her Cypriotness! Cypriot stud (talk) 00:23, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To [[User:PMA|PMA]] and others, re: so-called "Greek POV" 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Hamumu

message: sigh I'll make this as brief as I can. I am somewhat disappointed in the outcome here. About two days after the article was submitted, it was nominated for deletion for reasons, the only legitimate one being non-notability, which Mike Hommel (unregistered) later refuted. However, his position was completely ignored by those in charge because he had never posted before.
To add insult to injury, Dmcdevit had the audacity to accuse all four people who were for keeping of being the same person. His post read:
"I'm pretty sure you are Mike Hommel. All four of you, including the creator of the article. Or else how did you happen upon an article about your company here when you appear to be an amateur here in the exact weeklong period that the article is up for deletion. Don't play dumb. Also, where do you get off saying Mike Hommel "makes a living" from this game and "hasn't starved," and that "there are currently over 500 users" if you are not him? How are you in a position to speak intelligently of such things if you are only some dipassionate Wikipedian voting on an article, and not the same person as the rest of the keep voters? And still all of your contributions have been only to this page. How can I conclude otherwise?"
I will directly answer each and every point given here, as I have to every one of Dmcdevit's posts on this subject. Mike Hommel makes a living from independent game design, as I know, because I have actually seen his website. That he has not starved is evidenced by this quote from his website here: "I get to do exactly what I want to, every day, and I can still eat!" in addition to the fact that he has been running this business for seven years, evidencing that he is able to make enough money to support himself and his family.
That there are over 500 users is very easily verified by looking at the bottom of this page, where at the time of this posting it says: "We have 516 registered users".
I have no idea who Geoff Howland is. As for me (Frogdude) and drgamer (the author), we are somewhat active members of the Hamumu forum community. drgamer, who had never before participated in Wikipedia, rightly thought that Hamumu warranted a page on Wikipedia. I, Frogdude, first heard about the article in this thread on the Hamumu forums, and decided I would do what I could to argue against it's unwarranted deletion. And the unregistered Mike Hommel has apparently not signed up or participated on Wikipedia before, probably because, like me and presumably drgamer, we never saw anything warranting our editing before.
This marks my last post on the subject, as I'm sure you appreciate, if you care enough to read this, which I very much doubt. Frogdude 03:16, 30 July 2005 (UTC)