lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Me and Juliet

message: Somebody wrote the line "watch free gay porn" between the first two paragraphs. I have removed it. AlbertSM (talk) 15:45, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  These things happen due to the open nature of this encyclopedia.  Be assured that if you had not, an editor here would have within minutes at the most.  The Today's Featured Article is closely watched, but there is a reaction time, we are only human.--Wehwalt (talk) 16:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalization

message: Replaced the artwork in the infobox per the discussion here. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:51, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  I have a copy of the playbill coming, hopefully there is no copyright notice.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:49, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Artwork

message: Obviously the article could function either way, but the flow of *origin of the plot, the plot, tryouts, reception* seems to work in these articles.  For one thing, for these plays the commercial story is more of interest than the art work itself.  Also, I find the plots to be a little more of a pill to swallow with all the names and songs and all.  So getting things going with a section that is an easier read is a little nicer.
Of course, I don't know if the changes were made because they were beleived best for the reader, or because of acquiscence to critics.  
Anyway...glad to see a star on this thing! 
:I really wanted to try it differently.  I'm a nonconformist and if an article can be a little different, I'm all for it.  Thanks for the congrats.--Wehwalt (talk) 19:09, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll get you out of your shell eventually.TCO (talk) 22:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Like new order 

message: Presumably, the character names are meant to be evocative of Romeo and Juliet and Carmen; however, the character in "Carmen" is Don José, not Don Juan. Presumably, this was an error by Hammerstein, but I'm at a loss in figuring out whether or how to mention it. Incidentally, for anyone interested in gleaning some info on the Chicago production, there's currently a Chicago playbill available on eBay at http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Rodgers-Hammerstein-ME-JULIET-Ray-Walston-1954-Chicago-Playbill-/401303319634?hash=item5d6f8ab452. MisfitToys (talk) 17:34, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's Don Juan à la Don Giovanni. He could deal with Carmen which Jose does not, at least not in an acceptable way.--Wehwalt (talk) 17:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Character names
Talk:State Fair (1933 film)

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:State Fair_(1933_film_poster)_-_Restoration.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for November 29, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-11-29. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 15:08, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD 

message: While many articles about movies go into excruciating detail about every minute aspect of the production, this one doesn't even have a "plot" section.  How did that happen? Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 19:47, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot?
Talk:The Cheap Detective

message: I would have thought Ann Margaret was spoofing Velma from "Farewell My Lovely".  Velma was married to Judge Grayle, who was very old and unable to satisfy the needs of his much younger wife.  They lives in a mansion and Velma, after her husband leaves her alone with Marlowe, hits on him very hard.  In contrast, Carmen in "The Big Sleep" was married to no one, although she too was sort of a nymphomaniac.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:A0B0:1E70:9947:2B96:4AF7:9ACA (talk) 19:30, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Yellowbeard

message: Should we have some note about this film's lack of availability?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Aapold (talk • contribs) 
:Why?  It's on DVD, and amazon and netflix both carry it.  What more do you need?  -- stubblyhead | T/c 16:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

message: According to Feldman's bio on IMDB, his character was supposed to die in Yellowbeard, Feldman just died before the scene was shot, so a double had to be used. Which is the correct story?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.152.164.46 (talk) 14:35, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Feldman's Death

message: I heard (I think it was from David Bowie himself) that his role in the movie was completely accidental.  IIRC, he was basking on a beach in Mexico, when a masted sailing ship headed into the bay where he was sunning.  He introduced himself, and 'the gang' asked if he wanted to be in the movie.  And the shark was born.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulmmn (talk • contribs) 16:44, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable Rumour about David Bowie's Role

message: Is it worth noting that this is almost certainly the first time these three worked together since Brooks' Young Frankenstein?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamandrewssoul (talk • contribs) 14:59, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Feldman, Kahn, and Boyle
Talk:Glycolaldehyde

message: What is the IUPAC systematic name for this molecule? Is it hydroxyethanal? or carbonylethanol?
:The aldehyde group has higher priority than the alcohol group, so 2-hydroxyethanal is the IUPAC name. —Keenan Pepper 05:58, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated: Ethanal IUPAC now calls acetaldehyde. Similarly OCC=O is now 2-hydroxyacetaldehyde.(Sometimes it seems like IUPAC is going crazy -- Ammonia now has a systematic name "Azane". There will be a growing heap of old IUPAC names and new IUPAC names, alongside the heap of old and new popular names.) -Whiner01 (talk) 05:37, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Question: Why not write the systematic name (2-hydroxyethanal) so that people that don't know about the newest IUPAC changes can still identify the molecule (which was my case)? (User:imbiriba) Wed Nov 26 09:54:11 EST 2008  —Preceding undated comment was added at 14:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Two things, one major (perhaps) and one minor. The prebiotic section claims that lightning FOLLOWS glycolaldehyde and formaldehyde...that seems to be TOTALLY backwards. I'm pretty sure (but if I were positive, I'd change it myself) that lightning produces them, not follows their production. Secondly, I (stupidly) searched for glycoaldehyde and found nothing ..could the misspelling redirect to this article?Abitslow (talk) 14:59, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: Acetic acid also follows the molecular formula C2O2H4. Therefore, there needs to be at LEAST one source explaining why glycolaldehyde should be considered the only diose. This article currently provides zero explanation as to why glycolaldehyde should be considered the only diose. Frankly, it also provides no explanation as to why formaldehyde should not be considered a "monose" either. If you can't provide evidence or explanation then you shouldn't include it at all. Science Is My Life (talk) 15:35, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Diose 

message: In the box present in section "Structure", the first of the four structural formulae (the one at 70% of abundance) has three oxygen atoms. Is it perhaps a hydrated form of glycolaldehyde (the carbonyl turned into a gem-glycol)? Ekisbares (talk) 14:14, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structural formulae
Talk:Any Given Sunday

message: It's never meationed that the Miami Sharks, the main team, makes it to the Pathrenon Cup. The movie shows them beating Dallas, meations beating Minnesota, and being defeated by San Fansico, but meations nothing bout them making it to the Cup. IMO, if it's like the NFL playoffs, they beat Dallas in the wildcard playoffs, beat minnesota in the divisional playoffs, but lose to San Fansico in the conference finals, which is one step below the super bowl. This polt makes better sense, snice Al Pacino's charitther meations SF going on to win the cup, rather then being beaten by them in the game.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.13.37.3 (talk) 04:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: This article is quite poorly written overall and will require a great deal of polishing and rewriting. All comers welcome! Gdkh (talk) 07:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall Article 

message: Please source this trivia and re-add to the article. Thanks, Chaz Beckett 16:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please source this trivia 

message: Information added about the Bill Withers song, Use me, as the song is heard during the Dallas/Miami game action.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.215.1.116 (talk) 05:39, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 
Talk:U Turn (1997 film)

message: 1. What does "Release date August 27, 1997 (Telluride)" mean? Is that Telluride, CO? Why whould they release it there and then later to the rest of the U.S.A.?
2. What does "Reversal stock, 5239" mean? This sounds like jargon to me.
ICE77 (talk) 05:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: Does anyone know or is any comment from Stone made about the indigenous content in the film? Is it in the book? Does the author comment? What is going on at the ending with all the portraits of indigenous peoples? Are these supposed to be her ancestors? Is this a comment on how white people came in and ruined the indigenous peoples? Like how she said the whole town deserves to die for what they did? It did seem to be just a bunch of white people despite supposedly being a reserve....? 161.38.14.130 (talk) 06:43, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indigenous Content
Talk:Heaven & Earth (1993 film)

message: IS THIS ONE  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.222.35.63 (talk) 19:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: THE BEST MOVIE I HAVE EVER SAW

message: I updated the plot summary. It is more accurate. 134.241.194.66 (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: UPDATE

message: What happened to the earlier discussions about this page? 134.241.194.66 (talk) 00:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What Happened?
Talk:Talk Radio (film)

message: I have restored the RefImprove tag that was deleted by an IP editor. At this point, the references in this article are to an awards site and Rotten Tomatoes (each of which is used to reference just a single sentence) and to IMDb, which, as a user-editable source, is considered to not be a reliable source.  --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:28, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  RefImprove tag
Talk:Salvador (film)

message: There is a ton of conjecture, speculation, and opinion in this article, such as:
:Its gritty anti-hero protagonist, Richard Boyle, is a compelling focus for the political action.
It needs a POV brush-up.  I've never seen this movie, but someone who HAS seen it should give the article a neutrality cleaning. ♣♦ SmartGuy  ♥♠ (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs a POV cleaning

message: This article needs a lot of work. It lacks a proper plot summary, a development/production/filming schedule, the reception summary is extremely limited, and there is almost no mention of any awards the film won, which is interesting considering it was nominated for two Academy Awards.  It's just plain incomplete.
I noticed that someone added some of the pertinent information that is lacking, about half of it I should say, but it's all gone now.  Either way, this article needs to be addressed.
It's notably weak.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgarrison (talk • contribs) 08:43, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete article 

message: I see Richard Boyles name is coded as a link to the list of all Wikipedia articles for people named Richard Boyle, but there 
is no Wikipedia article for the photo-journalist Richard Boyle.  MS, Dania Fl206.192.35.125 (talk) 17:56, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Richard Boyle

message: While Romero's 1980 assassination was probably ordered by Roberto d'Aubisson, he did not form ARENA until 1981, 2601:441:4481:5C50:D1A7:9C4A:7BE9:6376 (talk) 01:47, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "assassinated by the far-right ARENA party"
Talk:Monty Python's Fliegender Zirkus

message: What are the reception figures relating to? German responses, British responses? Then or decades later? The way it's written now makes it sound like the German audience loved it on its original airing, but Alfred Biolek said in an interview on Die Harald Schmidt Show that it bombed back then, nobody watched it, and the network's execs hated it because they didn't get it, and that's why even though he would've liked to see more German episodes, it only remained two. Monty Python would remain utterly unknown in Germany until the large international scandal around 'Brian' in 1979. I think Palin is being his usual "nicest man in Britain" self when he seemingly contradicts that in that quote used earlier in the article. We Germans love Python since the 80s, but back in the 70s, only Biolek knew and liked them. --91.11.45.131 (talk) 02:01, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I've listened to the source now, and it sounds like the network's execs back in the day hid the actual responses from Biolek and his co-producing partner intentionally to cancel their plans for more German shows, and neither of the two found out until the partner, in preparation for the 2012 BBC4 feature, actually went into the WDR archives to find the actual surveys that had been done back in the early 70s. --91.11.45.131 (talk) 02:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: Apropos of nothing of real significant importance ... It's Graham playing The Pied Piper of Hamelin. ( In the image noted, it reads "Hameln", with a list of things The Pied Piper can & can't rid your village of. ) It was most likely part of the whole mouse themed segment. 75.104.182.200 (talk) 16:46, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graham Chapman's "Flute Player" ( Noted under "Lost Sketches" )
Talk:Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl

message: Is there a particular reason that we have some mangled epithets in the "adjustments to the Albatross sketch"? Considering that in the Hollywood Bowl Cleese says "of course you don't get fucking wafers with it you cunt", why draw attention to it in the introductory paragraph and then misquote? VonBlade (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wafers with it

message: Ethel the Aardvark Goes Quantity Surveying redirects to this article. I don't get it. Aidfarh (talk) 06:24, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethel the Aardvark Goes Quantity Surveying
Talk:Still Smokin (film)

message: I highly doubt that bestselling poet, playwright and Guggenheim fellow Susan Hahn is the same Susan Hahn that plays Hotel Maid in Still Smokin' and according to IMDB, Massacre in Dinosaur Valley.  CarlSerafino (talk) 19:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Susan Hahn
Talk:Dead Parrot sketch

message: Why does that wording redirect here? It should at least say that the species does not exist, and maybe even reference to Mopsitta, if this article is to be believed: []. » byeee 21:29, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That bit of trivia could be worth mentioning here. I don't see anything that demonstrates that they know what color its feathers were, though. It seems like they used some "poetic license." ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:36, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I clarified that the "Norwegian Blue" is a non-existent species in the lead-in, and I added a reference to the Mopsitta article in the "Further uses" section of this article. Johnson487682 (talk) 16:48, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norwegian Blue Parrot 

message: The article could mention that near the end of this episode of "Death In Paradise", (Netflix Index "Episode 22"), debuting February of 2014, a parrot of some significance to the plot is speculated to have been pining for the fjords at some point, which is puzzling because the parrot in the episode is not Blue although of course the migratory pattern might well extend from Norway to St. Marie, as the latter is fictitious.2604:2000:C682:B600:9C27:33B3:5D86:EAF3 (talk) 08:58, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Death In Paradise" Season Three, Episode Six
Talk:Splitting Heirs

message: - surely the long first paragraph should be separated and called 'Plot'? Not everyone wants to know the plot ... 
- "... aristocratic family, the Bournemouths":  Bournemouth is the dukedom rather than the family surname, the dialogue also says specifically "the Dukes of Bournemouth" ...
-  "he discovers evidence which he believes reveal him to be the true Bournemouth heir": this is surely established fairly early on as a matter of fact, not just what he believes, so the text could more accurately read "he discovers that he is the true Bournemouth heir"
- it's a bit of a shame to say "Tommy Patel is an Englishman raised by an Indian-English family", because it misses the lovely point that - however white and blue-eyed he was - he believed himself to be an Asian until his mother sees the symbolically signficant silver spoon, connects it with the silver rattle and the monogrammed coverlet, and tells him he was adopted. 
- I also got the impression his family were Indian, though lots of web-sites say Pakistani: as I remember it, the dialogue always says 'Asian', leaving the question open - doesn't it?
- Tommy's full name as given in the cast list is a bit of a confusing mixture: in his one persona he's 'Tommy Patel', in the other "Thomas Henry Butterfly Rainbow Peace, heir to the Duke of Bournemouth"
- anyone know why his mother calls him "Ranji"? - some connection with the famous cricketer who became a Maharaja???
- "He befriends American Henry Bournemouth": as the cast-list shows, at that stage he's "Henry Bullock": he only becomes a 'Bournemouth' when his father dies; and once they've accepted that Tommy is the real heir, he's Henry Bullock again, as on the side of the bus at the end, "Henry Bullock Tours"
- for me an important part of the plot and the portrayal of Tommy's character is that he was brought up and lives in a corner shop in Southall [= relatively poor immigrant area] with a dozen people queuing for the bathroom and completely subject to his mother's authority, while commuting daily to the City and handling business worth millions of pounds on the stock exchange; very odd that the author at Rotten Tomatoes thought he was a "lowly bank employee"
- "Shadgrind ... advises him to try to obtain his rightful place in the family" - OK, that describes the beginning of his involvement, but the real point of Shadgrind as part of the film is that he fixed all the murders believing that he would share the proceeds with Tommy ...
- another lovely detail is the collection of family portraits all showing some relationship with Eric Idle ;-)
- it's surely worth saying that they used Longleat as the stately home (according to the credits, and you can recognise it of course)
- the note about 'no DVD edition in the UK' makes it sound as if it weren't released at all there, and that there was no PAL version: it's worth saying that there *was* a VHS/PAL/UK version - there are a few copies around to buy ...
I'll look back in a few days and if no-one has any further comments, I'll add something according to these observations.
David Kettlewell (talk) 11:59, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Terry Jones' Medieval Lives

message: I have never seen or heard anything about an episode about the alchemist, are you sure there is one? I think you confuse it with the episode about the philosopher.
The Alchemist and the Philosopher episodes are the same, but you can find it with both names, I'm not sure but it might be a UK/USA title variation. Caesarcub 20:05, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't have been nearly as peeved at Harry Potter and the Alchemist's Stone. ;) —Tamfang (talk) 01:29, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone once remarked in an edit summary on another TV article that practically everything gets nominated for an Emmy, so it's not really worth mentioning. —Tamfang (talk) 17:04, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I heard otherwise. --LeyteWolfer (talk) 18:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emmy nomination notable?
Talk:The Man Who Killed Don Quixote

message: I believe the plot section references a version of the movie that's not the actual one. Toby is not "an advertising executive", he's the director of a movie (actually, two movies) with the same title of Gilliam's movie. And the film is his story, not the self-deluded Don Quixote's. And they don't jump back and forth in time, the parts that look like the 17th century are either dreams or fakeouts. Kumagoro-42 (talk) 02:24, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot section
Talk:Lost in La Mancha

message: This articel says Rochefort was injured, and within a week Gilliam learned that Rochefort had a herniated disc but Jean Rochefort has prostate infection. --ArmadilloFromHell 06:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A prostate infection was a separate problem mentioned in the film - it contributed to the actors starting late - but a  herniated disc is what caused Rochefort's pain on horseback and why he had to leave the production suddenly and couldn't return in time to salvage filming. According to the film, anyway. --Blogjack (talk) 02:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

text: "Days later it became clear that Rochefort was injured"; but how? --Bobbozzo (talk) 03:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Jean Rochefort - injury

message: The Sequal section needs to be reworked/updated now that He Dreams of Giants has been released. Camwad83 (talk) 10:46, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  He Dreams of Giants
Talk:Jabberwocky (film)

message: Since I haven't seen the film the plot needs to be added and expanded.--Paleface Jack (talk) 00:18, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the rather pointless insertion of a section header.  Please don't save sandbox edits.  If you have no intention of providing information for a section, please do not create the section and leave it blank. 12.233.147.42 (talk) 00:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Talk:Tideland

message: When watching the film to this book, I believed I was watching Salad Fingers the Movie. After reading this article I understand David Firth was indeed influenced by the book/film. However, is there really evidence for this, does he ever quote Tideland as one of his influences?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LAUBO (talk • contribs) 10:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salad Fingers 
Talk:Nudge Nudge

message: Does anyone think that additional information should be included to inform readers to the fact the term 'nudge nudge' has now entered the English language and can be used without prior knowledge of the sketch, as in:-
Kenneth Williams is well known for his 'nudge nudge' humour.
Any thoughts?--FruitMonkey 11:55, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Say no more!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.67.104.4 (talk) 17:00, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hate to tell you, but 'nudge nudge', 'wink wink' and 'say no more' were all ALREADY part of the English lexicon, perhaps putting the three together was novel, but not the phrases themselves. I note that the three refs in the article use 'nudge nudge', they DON'T attribute the phrase to or make any connection with Monty Python. Pincrete (talk) 21:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common usage