lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Zeacolpus vittatus

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 23:36, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Zeacumantus lutulentus

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 23:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Cat's paw (tool)

message: I removed the opening line "Nail pulling has been around as long as there have been nails." Of course there was no nail pulling before there were nails, and the article details the historical aspects of it very nicely without including the statement. 65.44.114.153 (talk) 19:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Nail Pulling

message: Removed from "History" section as largely irrelevant.  Interesting material, however.  I moved it here temporarily.  Note that there seem to be some weird formatting bugs somewhere, possibly in the Wiki software???
:New designs have been introduced, like the The Extractor, which can grip an exposed nail and pull it out. Other designs include the Nail Jack and Nail Hunter nail pullers, which take a pliers-like approach to the old cat's paw design.  These tools contain their own built in fulcrum, but can also be struck with a hammer to drive the tips of the tool into the wood with very little damage, allowing them to dig out nails that have been driven into wood at or below the surface.  The Nail Hunter nail pulling design has very precise tips that actually come completely together at the ends, for removing finish nails.  The pneumatic-powered Nail Kicker allows large numbers of old nails to be efficiently pulled.
Actually, there ought to be an article on "Nail puller (woodworking tool)".  If I can't find something like that, I might be inspired to start a new Wiki article from scratch.
Reify-tech (talk) 20:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed discussion of alternate nail-pulling tools

message: Looks more like a Dog bar. At least it's what we call them they are very good for getting nails out 122.56.211.217 (talk) 09:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cats paw bar
Talk:LT Robert A. Perchard Memorial Trophy

message: Intend to edit this page and better document and explain the notereity.Cliffwalk (talk) 17:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please give a brief explanation of why the award is notable, preferably with reliable sources. J Milburn (talk) 17:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zeacumantus subcarinatus

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 23:33, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Zeidora maoria

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 22:08, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:1996 in Australian television

message: I believe this article in not encyclopedic. Please refer to WP:NOT#STATS under Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Please correct if this does not fall under said category. Monkeytheboy (talk) 17:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability of Article

message: The pages for *Year* in Australian television all do not seem to include an article. They are merely lists that provide little or no notable content. Pages have already been deleted before because of their consisting of only a template with broken links to uncreated pages. Most pages also seem to need references and most can be considered stubs. Even though an article, for the mere fact of it being a list, does not make it encyclopedic, it would depend on what the list is about. 
Also, does the inclusion of a group of articles on the years in television history mean there will also be others about American television history by year? Mexican television by year? Russian television by year? And what events on television would be notable enough to include in the articles? Technically, anything that's past is historical, but would news be notable enough? If the Oscars are included, does that mean Premio Lo Nuestro is too due to the fact that is one of the most anticipated Spanish-speaking shows throughout the year by Latinos, though not by english speaking people, in the United States?Monkeytheboy (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Does every year in Australian television merit a page written in list form?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christian music/Southern Gospel music

message: ;List of cleanup articles for your project
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see:  Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
;Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages" 
If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation page",  contact me, User talk:Ikip
;Watchlisting all unreferenced articles
If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
Ikip  02:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people

message: Hey everybody. I would like to invite some of the editors here on Wikipedia that are involved in Christian Music related articles to particapate in a new project on Wikia focused entirely on Christian Music and other related topics called the Christian Music Wiki. The goal at the Christian Music Wiki is to create a Wikipedia-style encycolpedia dedicated to Christian bands (and band members), albums, songs, record labels, media publications and more. We plan to cover all genres of Christian Music, from gospel to heavy metal. If interested, please visit and feel free to contribute.
--Spence The Chef (talk) 04:14, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian Music Wiki 

message: * Project News: An admin is admonished
* Achievements: Ralph Abernathy promoted
* Featured article: Missionaries in the rainforest
* Did You Know: Ioan C. Filitti sentenced to death
:* Read this Ichthus in full * Get Ichthus delivered to your Talkpage * – Lionel(talk) 11:57, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Ichthus'' May 2018 is available 

message: * Project News: Is Genesis History? See the RFC.
* Did You Know: Phineas Hodson’s wife dies
* Featured article: Jewish boy causes fall of Roman Catholic Papal States?
:* Read this Ichthus in full * Get Ichthus delivered to your Talkpage * – Lionel(talk) 04:03, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Ichthus'' June 2018 is out now! 

message: * The Top 7 Report: The big news was the marriage of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle
* Did You Know: Sun of Unclouded Righteousness
* Our newest Featured list: List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events
:* Read this Ichthus in full * Get Ichthus delivered to your Talkpage * – Lionel(talk) 08:04, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Ichthus'' July 2018 is out now!
Talk:Charlton v. Kelly

message: I apologize that this is very sparse. But I figured it'd be best to get the ball rolling if anyone knows more about this case and/or proper Wiki formatting for SCOTUS cases. Ando228 (talk) 17:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless the article contains some prose soon, it is going to get deleted as being empty. Even if it is just a line explaining what the article is actually about (something like "Charlton v. Kelly was a...") please write it- seems a shame to lose an article like this. J Milburn (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the info box not enough? The problem is I really don't have time to read the entire case, look up subsequent cases and the like. Since it pertains to extradition treaties, it's still relevant but I'm no expert on law. Ando228 (talk) 18:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What you've added is fine to deal with the urgent threat of it being deleted. Further expansion could be easily done by the addition of reliable sources. J Milburn (talk) 18:59, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bella Sara

message: Any info the the meaning of the name?  Is 'Bella' or 'Sara' the name of a character in the game?  Or Bella related to the use of the word meaning of Beautiful?   How does a 'Sara card' relate to this?  
Just asking as these were some of the questions I came here with and are unanswered. If I find any answers, I'll update here, but just wanted to point it out in-case anyone can update the article. 69.95.192.20 (talk) 17:49, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Meaning 

message: I have actually been collecting the cards for a while and am very farmiliar with them. It is growing quickly in popularity not only in the USA but worldwide. Consequently, I agree that it should have its own place on Wikipedia. I'll do what I can to help edit and improve the page. Hopefulthinkin (talk) 00:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bella Sara 

message: I collect these cards, as well as my little brother. From my understanding, these originated in Denmark, and the Bellasara.com's FAQ backs this up.
Who Is conceptcard?
conceptcard is the company that originally created Bella Sara. conceptcard was founded in Svendborg, Denmark, in September 2005, the same month it published the first version of Bella Sara, which was then called Bella. Bella was sold first in Denmark and later in Norway and Sweden. Since its debut, over 6 million cards have been sold throughout Scandinavia.
ZaininOmega (talk) 18:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denmark 

message: shouldn't you say something in the talk page about -why- you are flagging the page for not meeting notability requirements, instead of just doing it? Shadowsill (talk) 13:36, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 

message: hi I colect bella sara cards and my little brother is thinking about colecting them too (me girl)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.168.240.205 (talk) 14:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HI!
Talk:Lamborghini V10

message: Unlike the engine from the Lamborghini Murciélago this engine is built by Audi (see Sport-Auto, December 2005 issue, page 60).  Does somebody know were?
The proper angle for a V10 engine to have even firing is 72º.  Does this engine have uneven firing, or is the crankshaft a special one with "split crankshaft journals" like it was used in later versions of the PRV engine? Rps (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can somebody complete the table (RPMs, Supperleggera torque) ? Rps (talk) 13:45, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ecco fatto. Di nada, signore. Cheers, --328cia (talk) 17:40, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ???
Talk:Districts of Latvia

message: What I have noticed with many of the English WP articles on Latvian Parishs is that they are located as part of the relevant, now defunct, District, rather than the modern Municipalities. 
Something along the lines of 'X Parish, in Y District before 2009 and now in Z Municipality' would cover this issue. 
Use can be made of equivalent articles on this wiki if more convenient: will do what I can. Jackiespeel (talk) 15:26, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Districts and municipalities
Talk:Protopope

message: I recommend the information on this page be merged into the exiting Wikipedia article Archpriest. Most of the information here is relevant to that entry--though the addition may make that article rather long. But the information here is useful, and the expression "Protopope" is not the most common form. MishaPan (talk) 18:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with MishaPan. Majoreditor (talk) 01:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge into Archpriest article
Talk:C17

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 18:36, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: C17 →  – C17 should redirect to Boeing C-17 Globemaster III, the primary topic. 93 percent of outgoing page views are for the American cargo aircraft. Schierbecker (talk) 04:32, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Disambiguation has been notified of this discussion. 何をしましたか？那晚安啦。 08:15, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

text: *It has been done. See: WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT and requested moves at Talk:FS1 (disambiguation), Talk:A220 (disambiguation), Talk:F111 (disambiguation), Talk:F14 (disambiguation), Talk:T90 (disambiguation), Talk:T80 (disambiguation), Talk:F16 (disambiguation), Talk:A24, Talk:F16 (disambiguation), Talk:M16 (disambiguation), Talk:F35 (disambiguation). Schierbecker (talk) 01:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 May 2022
Talk:Ligalize

message: As the author of the first note on this page evidently meant but was unable to say in grammatical English without obscenity, much of this article was evidently translated from Russian by a Russian speaker with only moderate English skills. It needs an awful lot of cleanup, which I may undertake when I am more awake. It also is entirely lacking in in-line references: there is a bunch of articles listed at the end, but no attributions whatsoever for individual sections or statements. --Thnidu (talk) 05:20, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a lot of cleanup 
Template talk:Museums and art galleries in Scotland

message: Might there be a case for splitting the other museums in the template into localities? 
Dunarc (talk) 20:23, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: I thought it would be good to have a section to cover museums relating to religion so I have added it in. Dunarc (talk) 15:53, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion
Talk:Skibbereen (song)

message: I was struck by the word band in the last verse. There is support for that word on other web sites, but I've always heard van which I believe suits the spirit of the song; the son is ready to fight, not play a bugle. Van does appear in many web sites.
Hearaoi (talk) 18:24, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Band" could easily refer to a group of men, it's not necessarily a music group. Look at "Band of Brothers", they didn't play much music. Andrimner (talk) 18:24, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Engagement (Seinfeld)

message: For whatever it's worth I've observed the chess position at the start of the episode is invalid/illegal. It contains a position where George moves his piece (playing black) while his knight already has the white King in check (with his other knight). Also the move the woman plays doesn't checkmate, and George's move left his queen en prise. Dancindazed (talk) 05:16, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The chess position at the start of the episode.
Talk:Independence Day (Pakistan)

message: Yaum-e-Azadi should be the name. Noobeditor (talk) 21:56, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The most common usage is Youm-e-Azadi, however, I added redirects to the other variations. --lTopGunl (talk) 23:58, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: We should rename the article

message: It seems much better now then what I did with it. :)--Inlandmamba (talk) 18:07, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. You can add a summary to the lead about the event maybe? --lTopGunl (talk) 18:13, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice Work 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: (non-admin closure) NOT MOVED - snow close of a bad-faith nomination.  User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 20:08, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Independence Day (Pakistan) →  – Two reasons, first, proposed name is WP:COMMONNAME. second, before 14 august, 1947 both india and pakistan were one country under british rule. On 14 august, 1947 a big land mass of India was cut named pakistan, so technically india got independence and pakistan was born because before 14 august, 1947 nothing was named as "pakistan" so how can something, which doesn't exist got independence? Jivejiv (talk) 14:08, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Pakistan has been notified of this discussion. VR talk 15:45, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 October 2021 

message: Pakistan zindabad 39.50.215.8 (talk) 16:04, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  14 Agust 

message: Wir wissen nicht genau, wann diese Nacht ist. Es ist eine der letzten 10 Nächte im Ramadan. 62.68.13.114 (talk) 08:11, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laylat al-Qadr 

message: "The successor governments would be given dominion status and would have an implicit right to secede from the British Commonwealth."
 - this should be 'from the British Empire', which both Pakistan and India subsequently did in becoming republics but both remain part of the commonwealth.
 - this brings it into line with the page on dominions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dominion#India,_Pakistan_and_Bangladesh).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.248.3.72 (talk) 14:00, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  section 02 

message: * ‘Independence Day’: With Hooligans on Roads, Without Rule of Law, Civility; Anwar Abbas August 15, 2022 
 Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 06:08, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs 

message: Why it is important to you and your family and friends 39.59.67.78 (talk) 16:21, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  14 august 

message: My first day at school
My first day at school
118.107.131.216 (talk) 10:56, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  My first day at school
Talk:Lyari Expressway Resettlement Project

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moonriddengirl (talk) 00:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: I've done what I can to remove the biased tone of this article and render it more factual, but it still only mentions positive things about the resettlement. That would be unbelievable enough on its own, but the citations and links at the bottom of this article suggest that the resettlement was controversial and even involved a lawsuit. This needs to be written into this article. -- asilvering (talk) 22:10, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased POV