lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Xingning, Guangdong

message: Xingning, a beautiful city, has cultivated generations of talents. So many students are enrolled to universities every year. You can see so many of them at the train station when they rush home at the end of each semester. But XingNing is still in poverty, I should say, considering many families can not afford the children's education fee. Welcome other Xingningers' comments on it. 
Wayneliu 14:40, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Redux (The X-Files)

message: Notability is clearly asserted. The JPStalk to me 14:43, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I corrected a quote that stated that this episode was the first episode to be filmed in widescreen.  This is untrue, because the opening shows scenes from the last episode of season 4 in widescreen.  These scenes are not cropped, but show more information on the left and right sides, suggesting that the last episode of season 4 was at least filmed in widescreen.  I won't posit if the native format of the X-Files is widescreen or which was originally shot in widescreen.  However, I just wanted to point out that this previous episode was filmed in a widescreen aspect ratio.Kakomu (talk) 10:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Widescreen
Talk:Lake Cascade

message: * Student participation - Put in info on HS students work on lake http://advbio.cascadeschools.org/class.html --Robbie Giles 14:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do 

message: The article claims this is 'formerly known as Payette Lake "The Mile High Playground"' (added  by a new editor User:Idahorobert with a source I can't verify). Payette Lake appears to be a separate lake to the north, so this dubious. Widefox; talk 01:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Payette Lake
Talk:Jim Bray

message: Smiller03 14:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Shakespeare authorship question

message: I think this info would be better as 3 columns.  Can anyone do this?Smatprt 14:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Please explain the deletion of authorship articles from the authorship template. That's what the template is for. Some theories have more than one supporter or variant. The level of coverage (weight) is directly related to the level of notability. Smatprt (talk) 05:06, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be specific. What pages were deleted? Tom Reedy (talk) 05:50, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Tom. You know perfectly well that there are two or three more theory-related articles, and there is the reasonable doubt article, to name a few. In the meantime, adding Emmerich, Orloff and Fields to the supporters list.Smatprt (talk) 03:59, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of Pages from Template 

message: I've trimmed some peripheral candidates and supporters from the template according to my interpretation of WP:NAV. Unless there's a separate authorship article or the candidate has garnered modern attention, they should not be on template. Same goes for "theorists": if the Emmerich, the director of a movie, is included (and it is obvious by now that his support was for promotional purposes), by the same logic all the actors should be included also, since they also promoted the movie in the same manner as he. Tom Reedy (talk) 18:54, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: How about John Paul Stevens? He's fairly well established as an Oxfordian. Joefromrandb (talk) 05:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trimming template
Talk:Blockbusters (American game show)

message: Enough of this back and forth nonsense. Everyone please hold back and leave it as it is now and SEARCH FOR A SOURCE. Whatever the correct spelling is, please focus on finding a verifiable source before changing it again. When you've found the source, add it as a reference in the article. Sottolacqua (talk) 23:42, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leland Young/Yung
Talk:Ignaz Trebitsch-Lincoln

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
Nearly a B.
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 19:36, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: All initiates were required to hand over their possessions to Abbot Chao Kung, as he now called himself, who also spent his time seducing nuns.
:Are there nuns in Buddhist monasteries? --Ghirla-трёп- 14:02, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: not sure, but they are not cloistered (nor are Buddhist monks).  It is probably wise to give a specific reference to the above though.--Erp 01:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Buddhist nun might be helpful here. DuncanHill 01:13, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Tibetan nuns are no hoax. You better watch out for them. As for Ignaz Trebitsch-Lincoln, it's like "Captain Speedy"-- the name makes you think "hoax". Wait for the reference-checker gnomes to dig out the truth-- or become one yourself! Cheers. --Yamara 19:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buddhist nuns? 

message: Yes, there are nuns in some Buddhist sects.  Some shave their heads. Google "Buddhist nuns" and see.  As for the article, it's not too far fetched.  There's lots of wacky characters like this throughout history - especially the history of espionage.  See Sir Richard Francis Burton, Sidney George Reilly, and Colonel Thomas Blood - and those are just the Brits!
: My all-time favourite adventurers are Móric Beňovský and Yakov Blumkin. --Ghirla-трёп- 19:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buddhist nuns? Yep. 

message: Probably isn't a hoax, but reads like a hoax. Needs footnotes and rewriting for style. --User:Krator (t c) 18:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like a hoax 

message: What are the kanji (Chinese characters) for Chao Kung? I would like to know. --211.19.218.101 18:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chao Kung

message: Under section Death it is stated the Nazis ordered the Japanese poison Trebitsch-Lincoln after they invaded Shanghai in 1943 (sic).  However, the Japanese had occupied Chinese administered Shanghai after a battle in 1937, then took over the Foreign concession territory of the port in 1941 - two years earlier. This needs checking.Cloptonson (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese in Shanghai

message: I'm sorry I see no proof of this organizations exitance? May you please provide sources for this topic? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sniperpiper1322 (talk • contribs) 08:38, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  White [[International ]]  

message: What was the fraud of which he was convicted ? -- Beardo (talk) 15:50, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fraud conviction
Talk:TNM staging system

message: Like so many systems and classifications in medicine, there is urgent need for internationally agreement, partly to facilitate research and partly for fruitful international scientific and clinical co-operation. The TNM system is not always as internationally cooperative as may first seem. One recent example that struck me was the changes made to the definition of lymph node metastases and vascular invasion in TNM6 from TNM5. These are thought by many in the UK to be unsupported by evidence, unneccesary and indeed potentially dangerous (P Quirke, E Morris (2007)- Reporting colorectal cancer; Histopathology 2007: 50 (1), 103–112) and I entirely agree with their arguments. The current UK guidance in reporting colorectal cancer recommends usage of TNM5 in preference to TNM6.  If the TNM system was a bit less Americo-centric then I'm sure that it would feature more prominently and have a greater part to play in the research and clinical management of cancer. My suggestion to the AJCC would be to ensure that any changes made to TNM are made by international consensus and also that any changes made are backed by rigorous evidence.
Created by Marek1975 (talk page - contributions) on 16:59, 8 July 2007
:This isn't a page for discussion about a subject of TNM, it's a page to discuss about the coherent article. Thanks anyway for your nice discussion! Dr. F.C. Turner - [USERPAGE|USERTALK] -  08:21, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Conversely, it could be argued that the comment from 2007 could be worked up into a new section within the article labeled "criticism" if adequate supporting material were pulled together. A project well worth undertaking if someone can devote some time to it.FeatherPluma (talk) 16:34, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

text: I reverted the article to using "tumor" consistently rather than admixing the two spellings, so things now conform to MoS guidelines (consistency); further, I judge the external reference to an iPhone app to be rather useful to users of that device (I am not) provided the app works well. If app users find it to be problematic, IMO removing the link with an explanation would be preferable to simply removing the link.FeatherPluma (talk) 16:51, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Holly Peterson

message: Hello. I would be in favour of creating a separate article about The Manny, separate from the author's article. However, I have not read the novel, so I have asked over at WikiProject Novels if anyone has. I thought I would ask here as well. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 10:13, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creating a new article about ''[[The Manny]]'' separate from author [[Holly Peterson]]'s page
Talk:Body of maxilla

message: As can be seen, this article is little more than a stub, yet has four readily-integratable sub-articles. Centralising this information benefit readers and future editors by displaying it in one place, giving more context and detail. Additionally, this fragmentation may mean that information is not accessed by readers. LT910001 (talk) 22:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Orbital surface of the body of the maxilla]]
Talk:So Fresh: The Hits of Summer 2001

message: In the booklet, the lyrics for the song "Two In A Million" by S Club 7 has an incorrect word.
"When I loose my way and the skies they get heavy
It'll be ok, the minute you're with me.
The word "minute" was incorrect and should've been "moment". AnimatedZebra (talk) 04:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Booklet Error
Talk:Cumberland Sound

message: According to mappoint.msn.com, there is another one up near the head of the Sound called Iglonga. Kelisi 15:10, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The spelling is Iglunga. There is something there but it's not a community. If you look at List of communities in Nunavut and scroll to the bottom there are links to the government list of communities. It may be an outpost camp similiar to Umingmaktok, Nunavut or it may be an old deserted trading post like Reid Island or Walker Bay. Here are some links that show the place www.tageo.com, www.worldcitydb.com and www.astromedia.org. At first I thought there was a weather station based on this but it's actually the weather recorded at Pangnirtung or MSN. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:17, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very well, I'll reinstate that text....Kelisi 01:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Only" settlement
Talk:Nerve tissue protein

message: This needs a stub tag, but I don't know which one... Mashford 15:14, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This

message: Lots of this stuff uses the catchall word protein.
That’s of very limited use. The names of amino acids is of greater use... there is one source that just repeats the word protein... someone wants a publication credit... but the type of amino acid the chemical ..is why I accessed this.. this article and its sources seemed to get me nowhere... perhaps revise the title ??? John5Russell3Finley (talk) 16:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names of amino acids
Talk:Petroleum exploration in the Arctic

message: I'm removing the Alaska and Norway headers as there is no text under them. I do know that those regions have petroleum though I do not know much about them. --Yottabytedev (talk) 18:21, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alaska and Norway 

message: What is a top-hole? It's mentioned in this wikipedia article, and here also 124.150.38.94 (talk) 01:30, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top-hole 
Talk:Infraorbital canal

message: Although not the same structure, the naming of these structures makes it confusing for readers to have three separate articles. Having all the "infraorbital" structures in one place is logical, as the foramen is the outward facing hole through which the canal communicates, and the canal is continuous with the groove. Having all this in one place helps readers by saving the "not to be confused with..." and reducing the fragmented approach with which this small canal is dealt with. I'm not proposing this approach for every canal, but I think it is warranted for simplicity here. Tom (LT) (talk) 04:26, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Infraorbital groove]] 

message: As above Tom (LT) (talk) 04:27, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Infraorbital foramen]]
Talk:Zygomatic process of maxilla

message: "Above it is rough and serrated for articulation with the zygomatic bone."
Isn't there a better way to say this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.126.94.10 (talk) 23:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Above

message: I removed excess images. Of the three that are left the one in the top of the infobox and the one in the "Additional images" section look the same just one rotates. I would say one of those can be considered excess.  Otr500 (talk) 03:05, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Incisive bone

message: should this not be merged with Premaxilla? ---  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmungall (talk • contribs) 21:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was suggested before, but the problem is that each term is prominently used for humans and animals, respectively.  A merger would wind up being inconvenient for someone regardless of direction, and this way we don't have to worry about the human info overwhelming the animal info. Mokele (talk) 23:47, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Currently the Premaxilla page contains useful information relevant to the human structure, e.g. embryology. I'm not sure the information on other animals would be overwhelming. The current page is a bit underwhelming in its lack of information. My preference would be to merge and if it ends up getting too big, or there are major anatomical or developmental differences between the human structure and other vertebrates then to split.  Cmungall (talk) 00:55, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  IMHO, if there is a merge, premaxilla should be the main page.  In humans, the incisive bone is usually just considered part of the maxilla, and given little attention (even medical schools gloss over it). However, in many other species, it's a prominent, distinct part of the upper jaw, with significant teeth.  I also know it's used to distinguish between species - pythons have teeth on the premaxilla, boas don't. HCA (talk) 14:00, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and have added a merge tag. These are two terms used for the same bone, and premaxilla is used for the human version too. FunkMonk (talk) 13:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I also support a merge for the above reasons, to the target 'premaxilla'. Tom (LT) (talk) 08:16, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 10:09, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:Chinese Paladin 3

message: I agree with Vintei on his view that the page posting is not appropriate. Will the original author use the Final Fantasy series page as a template guide on what needs to be written. Although wikipedia is not a game guide, we can at least introduce the subject matter properly.-Gammadion 02:37, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Be concise

message: This article looks like a game strategie guide. Please consider changing it. Thank you.--Vintei 15:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is not a game guide 

message: I deleted the Plot section because: this section was completly translated using an online translator from this page: http://games.sina.com.cn/z/pal3/2004-05-03/131650.shtml, though the author did do some changes. It is considered as "copying text from other website without license". Thank you.--Vintei 21:14, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted plot 

message: The release date says "China". Should this rather be "Taiwan"? The first game in the series was released in Taiwan first. SharkD (talk) 23:57, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. MobyGames provides the same data. SharkD (talk) 00:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 
Talk:IWGP Junior Heavyweight Tag Team Championship

message: Has been nominated for deletion on Commons. In the meantime I have restored a proper image to this featured article. Further input is welcome as to the usefulness of the belt image. --Majora (talk) 04:18, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extreme close up image of belt
Talk:Edward Grant

message: I just merged here material written by user:Marax in Edward Grant (Historian and philosopher), and the page is now a redirect to this article. --Leinad ∴  -diz aí. 15:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Can someone compere this text with --Vojvodaeist 19:34, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:This is Emily Yeung.

message: I quite enjoy watching Emily with my young ones. She's a smart, enthusiastic young kid, and I enjoy seeing her perspective on things. I also appreciate the fact that this show, as well as This is Daniel Cook is unscripted, the kids are allowed to be kids, and not obnoxious quipping moppets.
Amethyst42 15:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jolene Ivey

message: Whom did she support for president in 2016? ---Dagme (talk) 02:41, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clinton or Sanders? 
Talk:Olivier Strebelle

message: Oppose the proposal to merge in Athletes Alley as the artwork itself is associated with a major historic event (the 2008 Olympic games). Klbrain (talk) 13:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: > The production of Athletes Alley involved a technological collaboration between the image laboratory of Université Libre de Bruxelles, Tsinghua University, a French engineering consultancy specialising in metallic frame-works (C&E Ingénierie) and a German software company, Sofistik.
Doesn't look like there's a page for Sofistik, though.
If I try to visit Sofistik, I get redirected to Sophist. Linking to something more specific, such as Sofistik (software application) is an option.
TeodorHeggelund (talk) 14:58, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sofistik (software) has nothing to do with sophists (philosophy) 
Talk:James Shelby Downard

message: Forward to book: http://feralhouse.com/mini_sites/carnivals/carnivlas_foreword.pdf . -Location (talk) 05:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: For future reference
Talk:Rictius Varus

message: One sentence states the fact that modern scholars reject the existence of a 'Rictius Varus'.  However, no explanation is given as to why, and, except for the reference I just provided, no effort is made to track down the modern scholars and explain their views.  This article is very unbalanced;  its references point essentially to the same sources, repeated again and again,  and all of them are hagiographical in nature.  There is no effort to expose or explain the contradictions inherent in the stories, whether chronological or geographical.  -- Vicedomino (talk) 19:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Scholars reject the stories
Talk:Hague Secret Emissary Affair

message: This article:
"Even many South Koreans continue to believe in the dramatic suicide of one of the emissaries, which in reality, did not take place. The myth has its origins in the death of Yi Tjoune out of illness during the trip."
Korea under Japanese rule
"In June 1907, the Second Peace Conference was held in The Hague. Emperor Gojong secretly sent three representatives to bring the problems of Korea to the world's attention. The three envoys were refused access to the public debates by the international delegates who questioned the legality of the protectorate convention. Out of despair, one of the Korean representatives, Yi Tjoune, committed suicide at The Hague.[30]"
The latter claim's sourced but I never read the source. Please check the conflicting claims.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.10.124.104 (talk) 16:56, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Did Yi Tjoune commit suicide?

message: The section of Recision is not related to this Affair directly.
I think this should be merged to the Eulsa Treaty or/and Treaty on Basic Relations between Japan and the Republic of Korea or other treaties. These contexts are nice to expand the artcles. - 210.174.17.173 (talk) 11:09, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  the Recision sections

message: The sentence, In 2010, Japan argued that the chronological point of reference for "already null and void" was August 15, 1948, is weird and NOT logical. The treaty in 1965 says as following.
The treaty says before 1910. Why does Japan need to shift the chronological point to  August 15, 1948, even though Japan thinks the Japanese rule over Korea prior to 1948 (actually from 1910 to 1945) was legally valid? I think Japan does NOT want to shift this point to 1948, but Koreans do. Because Korean thinks the annexation was illegal. This sentence doesn't make sense.-210.174.17.173 (talk) 12:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The date for ''already null and void''
Talk:River Great Stour

message: I really cannot see why we have to keep perpetuating the idea that in some way this river is three separate ones! I realise that there is some disparity with what the Environment Agency says in different references: this one, for example, certainly shows the Great Stour as one of those listed; however the Internal Drainage Board specifically local, says that it is responsible for the River Stour, and both have a map which shows the entire length of the river. IMO the fact that different names are given to parts of the river - the Upper Great Stour; the Great Stour itself; and then the River Stour cannot hide the fact that the same water is flowing through all of them. So this one cannot be a source of the Stour - it is surely just part of the river with a different name? Nor can this have an estuary like it says - it isn't the end of the river by any means. Finally the University of Liverpool study, with its map so much better than ours, says exactly what I am saying. 
It seems to me that we need one article (:River Stour, Kent) which includes the whole river from Lenham to the sea. In it we use the recommended layout in the Wikipedia:WikiProject Rivers#Article Structure for that task. This includes the suggestion that a list of all tributaries is included: 
* that should include at least three before Ashford (names?) coming off the Greensand Ridge , which is where the river starts
* the four tributaries S of Ashford, including the first major one, the East Stour. They should be in some sort of order (clockwise?)
* the four tributaries N of Ashford (Brook Stream etc)
* Sarre Penn & Wantsum
* Little Stour
** all tributaries of those directly entering the S main river must be included  
Once we have done that article (and I have begun work on it) then all the others should follow - if it is considered to be necessary. The Kennington Stream is only 1.1 miles in length...
I have copied this comment to the Stour article  
Peter Shearan (talk) 14:37, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[River Stour]]
Talk:Symons Valley, Calgary

message: Kincora shouldn't redirect here as it's a different neighbourhood. 68.146.8.46 15:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there an article about Kinkora? Is Kinkora an official neighbourhoos yet, i.e. is it considered as such by the City of Calgary, or is it just the name of a development. Do you have any weblinks about this? Thanks. --Qyd 18:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Kincora is an official neighbourhood. I will convert the redirect to an article. Hwy43 (talk) 06:00, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Improper redirect