Talk:Diamond-Star Motors

message: I have some doubts about the second paragraph.  It seems to me to violate the NPOV rule.  RivGuySC 00:32, 13 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Second paragraph

message: I guess this page should get one. I'll try and put something together if no-one else does. -- DeLarge 16:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: I carried a lot of info over from previous revisions of this page, and one of the snippets is that "initially four models were produced" - the Galant and the three DSM 2+2s. Surely the Galant wasn't built by DSM until 1993? I'll wait  for comment, and if none are forthcoming I'll correct it. -- DeLarge 10:46, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected Galant info. Also, I removed the statements I added that the 3000GT / Dodge Stealth were built here. I can only guess that I was cutting/pasting from elsewhere and not paying attention, since I'd already mentioned the correct info - that they were all built in Nagoya - on the 3000GT talk page a month before. Big whoops, but no-one seems to have noticed. Shame on you all for your lack of vigilance! -- DeLarge 09:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original cars

message: The vehicles that Diamond-Star Motors produced, which include particularly the Mitsubishi Eclipse and the Eagle Talon now have a large cult following.[1] These vehicles were equipped from the factory with much more capability for speed then other vehicles at the time.[2] Finding the three vehicles, Talon Eclipse and Laser are commonplace in the streets.[3]
Many of the market who still buy the used Diamond-Star Motors vehicles attempt to purchase the vehicle with a production date of up to 1992, in which the motor changed in that year.[4] Known to the owners, it went from a 6 Bolt Crank to a 7 Bolt.[5] The 7 Bolt was widely panned at the time and to this day due to a symptom known as "Crank Walk".[6] A majority of the buyers today look for primarily the turbo version of all three of the cars in all wheel drive drivetrain form.[7]
Moved these paragraphs here. They're grammatically poor (1, 3), POV (2, 6) and don't cite their sources (1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7). I also think the section is relevant to the cars, not the factory, and therefore shouldn't even be in this page. The "crankwalk" stuff is already mentioned in the Eagle Talon article. --DeLarge 22:34, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Aftermarket and Tuning Community (moved from main article)

message: Several things were reverted here; here's my explanation:
* Splitting into subsections. Each subsection was as little as one or two sentences, a layout deprecated at the Wikipedia:Guide to layout#Body sections.
* "Co-operation" in the past tense. The sentence was about the two companies co-operating referred to that topic in general, not specifically at Normal. They have indeed continued to do so to the present day (e.g. GEMA). It also seemed factually inaccurate, stating that co-operation at Normal ceased in '03 and there have been no Dodge/Chryser-branded vehicles produced since then. Not true -- the Sebring & Stratus were produced there until February 2005.
* Mention of MMNA in "Current Production". It's already mentioned in the opening paragraph, so is redundant.
Regards, --DeLarge 16:09, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  reversion on [[May 30]] [[2005]] 

message: :Image:Mmna aerial.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Mmna aerial.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Diamond-Star Motors. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151202174548/http://www.cinewsnow.com/news/local/Union-workers-say-goodbye-to-27-years-at-Mitsubishi-plant-359076501.html to http://www.cinewsnow.com/news/local/Union-workers-say-goodbye-to-27-years-at-Mitsubishi-plant-359076501.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified