Talk:Dendropsophus branneri

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dendropsophus branneri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140627000000/http://www.iucnredlist.org to http://www.iucnredlist.org
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: — Assignment last updated by Eurquhart02 (talk) 21:01, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022

message: I have added the following sections to this page: Description (adult, tadpole), Habitat and Distribution, Conservation (Habitat loss), Phylogeny and close relatives, Diet, Mating (breeding season, male/male interactions), Enemies (predators, parasites), and Vocalizations. Frogboi123 (talk) 19:54, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates to page 

message: I noticed that there was some information left out in the male-to-male aggression article such as cost to aggression, so I added them in. I also included more information on habitats and adaptivity. There were also a few minor typos which I modified. Overall, I think this article is well written and organized clearly such that everything flows well. Emily486103 (talk) 22:11, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: I think the information of the frog being able to live and breed in a wide variety of habitats was very interesting so I added that information to the lead section. Overall, I think this is a very good article with a lot of interesting information that is well organized. Qazwsx1515 (talk) 21:49, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: Great work on the frog entry! I particularly enjoyed the discussion on habitat loss and the frog's breeding behaviors near the end. I went ahead and revised the information in the "habitat and distribution" section by checking and revising sources. I also added some extra hyperlinks and removed any redundant information to make the section more insightful and concise. Some suggestions to improve the entry would be to maybe include information on any frog predatory defense mechanisms and conservation methods against habitat loss in the Atlantic forest. Hoonji2022 (talk) 04:39, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review + Comments 

message: For the most part after the first read through, I thought that the article was written very well. I think in some sections you did a phenomenal job in thoroughly explaining some pieces of information and concepts. I edited a few grammatical and spelling errors that I saw. I thought the organization was fairly decent. Typically I think conservation should be at the end, but since it is about habitat loss it flows well. The section about habitat loss is very well written and includes a great amount of detail. I thought for the most part the sentence structure and paragraph structure were both very solid. I went through and tried to edit to make some areas more clear and concise. Sometimes some areas got a little redundant or slightly difficult to understand. I also thought the section about vocalizations was very intriguing. However, the first few sentences deal with the numerical data around the vocalizations that are hard to make sense of for the average reader, maybe including reference examples or an example of what that sound is like would be beneficial. There were also a few portions that I saw data and information that seemed to have came from a scholarly source that I did not see a citation for. I think running through and making sure all pieces of information that you used was cited could be beneficial. Another factor I think that would help enhance the paper is the addition of images of the frog that capture all the features described in its description. Images along with captions help the reader visualize the frog and associate an image with the information they are reading. An image of a map that displays the distribution of the frogs for example would be very beneficial for visualization purposes. Other than the few grammatical errors or portions that were slightly difficult to understand, the entire article was filled with very detailed and unique information. Very good job.  Yarlagaddas (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: South Africa has the most diveres and unique floral kingdom in the world ,And 70%of the cape floral kingdom occurs nowhere on earth.
In the months of November  to January  you can swim with whale sharks inthe gulfof tadjourag in djibouti.
Rhino horns are now being poisoned  to prevent poaching the poison is non toxic to the animals however any posioned horn that is poached will show up on airport scans and whatever powder tea or creamis then made will result un a bitter taste and possible  burns.
It takes 1 minute longer to boil an egg in Johannesburg than in cape town and Durban this is because joburg is 2000m above sea level where the air is less dense 41.116.85.79 (talk) 11:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fun fact😂