Talk:2006 US Open – Girls' singles

message: References for the qualifying tournament:   and  –Pakman044 08:41, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.usopen.org/en_US/news/articles/2006-09-03/200609031157336641000.html
** In 2006 US Open – Girls' Singles on 2011-05-26 02:18:42, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 US Open – Girls' Singles on 2011-06-14 08:26:16, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 US Open – Girls' Singles on 2011-06-14 12:32:56, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.carolinewozniacki.dk/blog/us-open-2/
** In 2006 US Open – Girls' Singles on 2011-05-26 02:18:42, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 US Open – Girls' Singles on 2011-06-14 12:32:57, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 12:33, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 2 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 2006 US Open – Girls' Singles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070603145248/http://www.carolinewozniacki.dk/blog/us-open-2/ to http://www.carolinewozniacki.dk/blog/us-open-2/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Article says in the juniors' this year, having already been elevated to the seniors'.  Is it really necessary to have the apostrophes in there, signaling an elide word such as division?  Many sources don't.  We could just say in the juniors this year, having already been elevated to the seniors. Opinions? Dicklyon (talk) 14:42, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it really proper English? The word is Juniors not Junior and "this year" really isn't possessive. The plural of a normal English word never has an apostrophe if it is not also a possessive. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume that the apostrophe comes from shortening "juniors' division", where the possessive is somewhat plausible, though not all that common in sources.  So it sounds like you agree we should just take those out. Dicklyon (talk) 04:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Rarely would you say Juniors' Division. It's pretty much always just "Juniors." Yes I agree we should take it out. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:48, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, did that here.  I don't know if this happens in other articles. Dicklyon (talk) 07:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Maybe not in tennis, but I see it in De La Salle Green Archers and Mapúa Cardinals.  I'll probably let it slide as I have bigger fish to fry. Dicklyon (talk) 07:14, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juniors' possessive