Talk:Dobrica Ćosić

message: He "was a writer".......Thats not true! He IS a writer,because he is still alive and hes still very much writing,so Im going to edit it.212.200.135.222 13:20, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: "Poet of the revolution of Presidents yacht"?!?!?!?Kako to glasi na Srpskom,kada je knjiga izdata i u cijem izdanju.
If you dont give the facts about it,then I`ll be forced to delete that sentence.You have a deadline of 48 hours.Dzoni 12:35, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WHAT THE F

message: I may not be an admirer of Ćosić's, but as it stands the article is written in a very unencyclopaedic and partial fashion. For example: "Ćosić's infatuation with Tito would soon turn to hatred". That's whz I've applied the NPOV tag. --estavisti 15:03, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: How would you express that fact in an encyclopedic fashion?  He was infatuated; he admits it; his love turned to hatred; he proclaims that.  Where is the problem?  I simply don't see the partiality.  
Since I just read the npov policy, it seems that you ought to be the one to fix it (the policy's position is that if someone sees a pov problem, it must be there).  So go ahead, please. 
And, you can delete whatever you want, Dzoni.  I'll put it back when I have the cite.  I find it hard to believe that you do not know about the poem, which is in fact real.  Danilo Kis.  'Pesnik revolucije na predsednickom brodu.'  
I'm not planning on responding to any more of your angry b*llsh*t. You probably need therapy. (That's not impartial, though, is it?)
profnjm
Since when some second-hand commentary from Radio Free Europe can be source for article which claims to be on something calling "encyclopedia"?
Ignorance at its best.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.69.5.228 (talk) 20:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Responses

message: Found at http://www.grupa.org.yu/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1055094836/30, after a quick Google search.
(you do read Serbian, don't you???)
profnjm
Thats clarly a fake,beacuse that was not a Serbian,its croatian language,its clear that it was written by Kis,cause Kis was a Jew from Serbia,so this is fake,and this will never ever be in this article(even if it was real,it should be in article about Danilo Kis,not here,so im going to delete it,and dont do this again,do you understand,mamu ti jebem kurvinjsku u usta)Dzoni 14:48, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Poem

message: Here's a question that will prove just how right you are: how do  you get your comments to be time- and date-stamped?  (treba li prevod?)  profnjm
got it, never mind.  Profnjm 14:25, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hey Dzoni Who Thinks I'm an Idiot

message: 1.Just because someone wrote it on some internet forum doesnt make it authentic.
2.Its written on Croatian,even tho Kis was from Serbia
3.Its not clear who it is about,since its not mentioning any names
4.Its very bad written and its rude and offensive,its not something that should be mentioned in serious article,and heres a example of how athetic this poem is(for those of you who dont speek Croatian,its about forking):
"Što se paka vjetrova tiče 
(tu ne mislim na pasate), 
Treba naprosto suspregnuti crijeva. 
(to je ka što dođe čovjeku spontano 
Da zijeva, 
Kraj logorske vatre 
Kad mu se zadrijema) 
Daklem: 
 
Ni naglas niti  
Profunjariti 
Neki prdež, 
Što je, gledano iz aspekta okusa 
U fokusu pažnje; 
Još gore: sve to ostaje u zraku! 
Najbolje je , ako drugog rješenja nema, 
Izići diskretno 
I zadržat se tamo što dulje, 
Prnu vani 
Pa odmah uniđu 
(umjesto da puste ovdje goluba 
Pa da ondak iziđu na palubu)." 
THATS WHY THIS "POEM" WONT BE MENTIONED IN THIS ARTICLEDzoni 15:11, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This is why that poem wont be mentioned in this article

message: Good job, young Luke. The force is with you.  
Now for the CIA reference, please.  You said Otpor was funded by the CIA.  Prove it? profnjm
As for the rest: I spend time on Cosic because I improved the entry and wish to continue to do so.  Oddly, I drew flies -- you, in particular.  You obviously have a lot invested in this.  I don't care about Serbia's current politics.  I just thought I could help out the Cosic entry on Wikipedia.
You can hold on to your fantasies about me, I don't care.  Just so long as they remain fantasies. 
 profnjm 21:39, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Retarded Housewife Needs Another Cite

message: NEMOJTE VISE DA VANDALIZUJETE CLANAK,DIVLJACI JEDNI,SA TIM POTPUNO IZMISLJENIM CITATOM,KOJI CAK NIJE NI VALJANO PREVED NA ENGLESKI!!!!OR I WILL HAVE TO REPORT YOU TO THE WIKIPEDIA ADMINISTRTORS AND YOU WILL ALL GET BLOCKED FOREVER!!Dzoni 12:53, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ALO BRE

message: 1. The quote is not fake, but it does need context.
2. Somebody out there probably ought to spend some time with the actual writings of Dobrica Cosic before they leap into the discussion.  
Profnjm 15:33, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "quote" 

message: The image :File:NAM Identificador.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with File:NAM Identificador.jpg

message: The web site that announced Nobel for Mr. Ćosić is a hoax. It is made up to look exactly as real official site, and all the links follow to other page, the official one, not to itself. It's obvious.  User:hristodulo 1233 6-okt-2011  —Preceding undated comment added 10:33, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologies, I was taken in by the Guardian's announcement.  now corrected. Vizjim (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Nobel prize is a hoax

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dobrica Ćosić. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090327221636/http://video.google.com:80/videoplay?docid=-2765553072882910702&q=chomsky+mandic to http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2765553072882910702&q=chomsky+mandic
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dobrica Ćosić. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070327212553/http://www.b92.net:80/info/emisije/pescanik.php?yyyy=2007&mm=03&nav_id=237772 to http://www.b92.net/info/emisije/pescanik.php?yyyy=2007&mm=03&nav_id=237772
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Since his real name is Dobrosav shouldn't the article be renamed in "Dobrosav Ćosić"?
DarkoRatic (talk) 13:28, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:COMMONNAME. 23 editor (talk) 14:54, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name