Talk:Mantua

message: Why is there a copyedit tag on the article? It is very well written and not in need of correction. Rintrah 14:13, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. After looking at the last changes that were made, I think the tag is valid. I didn't notice any problems while I had read the article tired and quickly. But I still think it is well written. Rintrah 08:12, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, no offence/offense intended by the copyedit tag.  I agree it's a really good, well-put-together article (makes me want to visit Mantua).  Much of it just appears to have been written by a non-native English user. -- Muffuletta 19:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: None taken: I didn't write it. I see that now when I read the article not half-asleep. Indeed, I am only one quarter-asleep now. Rintrah 12:56, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit

message: Siege of Mantua (1799)‎ mentions a fortress, map of which is here. Yet the text does not mention any fortress. Why? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  13:57, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fortress

message: It can't be true that "The city was founded, probably around 2000 BC". Perhaps the writer simply means there are signs of settlement going back that far. If so, say soCampolongo (talk) 17:25, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Founded 2000 B.C,

message: Substituted at 23:01, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mantua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5h5lo4xqA?url=http://www.italica.rai.it/rinascimento/parole_chiave/schede/castiglione_baldassarre.htm to http://www.italica.rai.it/rinascimento/parole_chiave/schede/castiglione_baldassarre.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mantua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927192658/http://www.thewest.com.au/default.aspx?MenuID=29&ContentID=20853 to http://www.thewest.com.au/default.aspx?MenuID=29&ContentID=20853
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This gives the impression that Mantua dates from some 4000 years ago, or 1500 years before Rome, which is highly unlikely. Anyway, the two sources given for the statement can both be read online and neither confirms the date 2000 BC, or indeed even mentions it. I propose to remove the statement.METRANGOLO1 (talk) 11:40, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mantua was an island settlement first established about  2000 BC  

message: Meaning unclear: "Mantua was subsequently fought between the first and second Punic wars against the Romans, ...." 
Does "fought" mean contested or fought over? If so, "against the Romans" is odd since there were two sides in those wars, Rome and Carthage.
Or does it mean Mantua fought against the Romans between the wars? If so, "was" should be deleted and the "between" phrase should be after "against the Romans" to reduce confusion. Billfalls (talk) 22:54, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New copy edit request