Template talk:LPR

message: Some explanation of what this template does and how to use it would be appropriate...? JulesH 10:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps... 

message: 99.9% of the articles that use this template preload incorrectly. They're preloaded with an empty article parameter and 99.9% of the editors forget to add this paramter so the link to update the version number is therefore broken.   should be changed to PAGENAME (which I think is correct) so that editors who miss this (as it's no pointed out they need to edit this anywhere) will be caught by the template itself.  Q T C 10:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 16:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template needs fixing 

message: Can this template be update so that it doesn't insert a space before the comma following the date? It looks ugly. Thanks. --the Wild Falcon (talk | log) 09:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space before comma 

message: Dunno how long this has been around, but it affects Featured article Opera (web browser), where in the infobox clicking on version number for either stable or preview release, traps the user in an edit window of a redirect.  I already mentioned it on  where it also needs fixing.
Please replace:
 Template:Latest preview release
with
 Template:Latest preview software release
The same edit needs to happen in the template for stable releases. --Mareklug talk 22:20, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done I think. Happy‑melon 11:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  edit request - double-redirect needs fixing 

message: Please update this template from the code in . I've added a testcases subpage for the new code and also a documentation subpage. The companion  template also needs updating.--Tothwolf (talk) 12:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated version 

message: Dear Wikipedia contribuitors,
could you please change the template so it reads "Latest previous software release"? That way it can be contrasted with the "Latest stable software release" that must be the "current" one. I apologize if I am wrong and, if I am, could you please explain this template to me.
Thanks in advance. George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 15:17, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Preview version can be compared to a pre-release version, which can sometimes be a beta or alpha version. See software release life cycle. --Tothwolf (talk) 16:00, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change from preview to previous 

message: In Firefox and other pages using the template there is a superfluous space between "three days ago" and a right parenthesis:
:three days ago )
This should be fixed. -Mardus (talk) 14:22, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superfluous space 

message: Template:LPR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:42, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|Nomination for deletion]] of [[Template:LPR]] 

message: Please change the template to match  with the following code:

 ±
	

(code taken from the sandbox and tested in test cases.)
This style has been determined by consensus demonstrated on the talk page for Template:LSR (see Template talk:LSR#Discussion and Template talk:LSR#Poll). The Anonymouse (talk | contribs) 04:18, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Style 

message: Hi I would like to have these codes included in template:LPR it codes include the + button and the old style 

	

109.151.163.1 (talk) 14:06, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The link on the version number was removed on purpose like in . I'd propose to discuss the issue there (see Template talk:LSR/Archive 1#New style for Template:LSR) since both templates should be kept in sync anyway and arguments for one of them should always be valid for the other, too. -- Patrick87 (talk) 14:39, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ok 109.151.163.1 (talk) 14:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New style for Template:LPR 

message: Hi could we convert this template into module please. This is just a suggestion. 94.0.201.140 (talk) 19:12, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convert template into module 

message: Now that this template is used in , the edit link may be misleading. Please, implement  to fix this issue.  was made to  (see discussion). — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 19:59, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: —cyberpower ChatOnline 06:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit link 

message: Hi.
You might have noticed that today, I reverted the support for Template:Multiple stable software releases which was added on 27 April 2014. To find out why, you may study .
Best regards,<Br/>Codename Lisa (talk) 13:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted support for Template:Multiple stable software releases 

message: I have removed the small tags from this template and from  per MOS:FONTSIZE. Small text was displaying at 75% of the default font size in infoboxes. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:35, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small tags removed