lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:London Underground Standard Stock

message: Why is this stock also referred to as pre-1938 stock as the 1935 stock was also built before 1938 and is of a totally different design to the Standard Stock.  The 1938 stock was based on the 1935 stock.  Therefore pre-1938 should be pre-1935 instead.Jsp3970 13:07, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pre-1938 is a designation used by many of the published sources. There are no published sources which use the pre-1935 designation, since that stock was experimental. Bob1960evens (talk) 10:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

text: If you have a source for this information, then please add it yourself. Bob1960evens (talk) 10:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pre-1938 stock

message: "The Standard Stock title was applied to a variety of Tube stock built between 1923-34, which shared the same basic characteristics, but with some detailed differences."
Specifically the part that says "which shared the same basic characteristics". Shared with what? Different than what? If it's comparing this variety of Tube stock with the previous variety (which is what I would assume it to be saying) then it should be worded to explicitly state what it's comparing it to, especially considering there are several varieties listed. As it stands I have no idea what versions share similar basic characteristics or even what those characteristics are. StarkRG (talk) 04:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Shared with each other. As the sentence says, there were several types of tube stock built between 1923 and 1934, which were all similar in appearance and design, but were not identical, as they were built by several manufacturers. Bob1960evens (talk) 10:04, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing opening sentence 

message: Does anyone have a source for the experimental 1923 cars being called 1922 or Competition Stock? In all my sources, the 1920 Stock is called 1919/22 Stock, and there is no mention of 1922 being applied to the standard stock prototypes. Bob1960evens (talk) 10:02, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have finally found a source for the Competition Stock designation - Hardy (2001) p.54. Bob1960evens (talk) 08:15, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 1922 or Competition Stock
Talk:Pilot signal

message: The Pilottone article is uncategorised and has only two links into it. Merger this way round looks logical to me, though I'm not an expert. --Mereda 13:15, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger from Pilottone

message: This sentence is inaccurate: "In FM stereo broadcasting, a pilot tone of 19 kHz indicates that there is stereophonic information at 38 kHz (19×2, the second harmonic of the pilot)."  It should read as follows: "In FM stereo broadcasting, a pilot tone of 19 kHz in the demodulated audio signal indicates that stereophonic information is included as a double-sideband supressed carrier signal centred at 38 kHz, the supressed second harmonic of the pilot."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.48.177 (talk) 11:13, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate Sentence
Talk:Stewart Stevenson

message: I think there a number of questions which it is perfectly legitimate to ask when the subject is a significant contributor.
1. Have any contributions from others been materially amended or deleted by the subject as contributor (SAC) so as to diverge from proper neutrality?
I suggest an examination of the update record easily disposes of that option.
2. Have any of the contributions by SAC been selective and hence have the potential to diverge from neutrality?
More difficult to assess but examining contributions made should suggest that other people have had their efforts properly reflected in SAC contribution and indeed this SAC can be seen to have made similar additions to other Subject's entries that mirror a least one here.
3. Are SAC contributions coming from reliable and verifiable sources and enabling assessment, through further reference to such sources, as to whether material omissions which compromise neutrality been made?
The foot-noting is extensive and draws upon very well established bodies such as the Scottish Parliament, BBC and the Scotsman newspaper.
4. Does the substantive article benefit from contributions from SAC?
Little doubt that no one knows the subject better than his or her self. Therefore insights are available that might otherwise be denied the reader and which widen the areas over which a critical (in the neutral, academic sense) eye can be cast to assess whether balance and neutrality are maintained.
Summary.
I think examination justifies removal of the warning to the reader that could be seen by some to impugne the integrity of the Subject as Contributor. A rapid conclusion should be reached please!
ZSSTEVENS (aka Stewart Stevenson) who is the subject as contributor (SAC). 2009-04-19, 1545 GMT  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zsstevens (talk • contribs) 15:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Subject as Contributor 

message: 34% of this article has been written by the subject in question. Andy's removal of the tag in question appears pointy. Does someone need to review the article in question with respect to balance, IMO yes. User:Drchriswilliams your thoughts? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 08:44, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: As you well know, the template's documentation says: if you place this tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article. If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning. No such discussion exists, so I have removed the template, in accordance with the guidance for its use. I also note that the article subject is a BLP. And if you're going to discuss me on talk pages, please have the courtesy to ping me. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:27, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Connected contributor
Talk:Stewart Sutherland, Baron Sutherland of Houndwood

message: Here: http://corporate.britannica.com/board/sutherland.html it says his BA was from Cambridge and his MA from Aberdeen. I would suggest therefore that the order of his degrees on the main page be changed, but it seems somehow impertinent to do so without doing more research, which I haven't really got the inclination to do at this moment. I'd also be interested in where he was born and went to school, but ditto.
86.77.219.253 (talk) 23:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:José Rizal (film)

message: Since the movie title didn't have a diacritic? --Howard the Duck 13:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed that's what we've done in the Tagalog Wikipedia.  You're date is so advanced! It's only 25 not 27. Is it a bug in the MediaWiki or in your computer? -- Felipe Aira 02:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out the date :p --Howard the Duck 14:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to [[Jose Rizal (film)]]? 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators 'Willemstad be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributxzors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MLauba (talk) 13:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Live Seventy Nine

message: Do we know the date and venue of the original recording and if so could it be added to the article please? Cheers. --kingboyk (talk) 12:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two varying sources given: Huw LL has stated Oxford (as quoted in the article), but also St Albans seems to have been accepted by the biographers (Carol Clerk's Saga Of hawkwind and Ian Abrahams' Sonic Assassins). What does seem to be agreed, is that ovedubs were recorded at Eel Pie Studios. - Drwhawkfan (talk) 20:11, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording date? 
Talk:Stig Inge Bjørnebye

message: The lead section and international career subheadings both state that Bjørnebye was capped 75 times, but the wikibox on the side has that number at 76. I've found websites that claim both. 75 seems to have more sources backing it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by YogurtLover5 (talk • contribs) 14:19, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Caps
Talk:Live to Be Stalin

message: These English titles have translation issues. Are they official in any way? Dekimasu 10:40, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: English titles
Talk:Stirling Mortlock

message: Have used the needs photo parameter as the existing photo does little to identify the player.
SauliH (talk) 05:36, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Also, the image might be better positioned lower in the article. wcrosbie, Melbourne, Australia 03:05, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs Photo
Talk:Stochelo Rosenberg

message: This article is a blatant copy of an article from here:
http://www.eimers-guitars.nl/SRSM-home.htm
I will remove the plagiarized material in a few days, once others have seen it too and/or commented. dq 21:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I removed it. Someone can feel free to write a legitimate biography on Stochelo that is based on the article-- it just can't be blatantly copied. dq 14:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Article is Plagiarized
Talk:Living in Fiction

message: I've looked around and can't find much, If anyone knows if this album charted at all?, How many albums sold? and singles? Where it was released? (as in which country's) this would be good info to put into the article, and I'll keep looking myself. --Chad 06:39, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: How many albums sold?
Talk:Locomotives of the Southern Railway (UK)

message: This will need care, because the redlink SECR R1 Class is used for two unrelated classes, one being Kirtley's development of his own LCDR "R" class 0-6-0T, the other being Wainwright's rebuild of the Stirling "R" class 4-4-0. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SECR R1 Class 

message: In the section Locomotives of the Southern Railway#London, Chatham and Dover Railway, William Cubitt is named. This is in accordance with
*
*
However, I don't think that this can be right. A thorough check of
*
does not turn up any instances of William Cubitt; the name Cubitt does occur several times (for example, on pages 8, 19, 20, and 33) but I can find only one place where this is qualified with a first name: on page 12, Joseph Cubitt is named in connection with the planning of Longhedge Works. Other books also name Joseph Cubitt in connection with the LCDR, for instance
*
a book which lists William Cubitt, but without mentioning the LCDR; and most importantly, in 
*
there is the sentence "At first Joseph Cubitt acted as locomotive superintendent, and he in turn called in Crampton." He is again named on p. 75. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:10, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cubitt on the London, Chatham and Dover
Talk:Local Hero (soundtrack)

message: Would it be worth it for me to make a page for this song? I ask because it has featured on an EP, a single as a B-Side and a 'Greatest Hits' album. Middle Eye 512 (talk) 18:06, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Going Home
Talk:Loco Live

message: "Ignorance is Bliss" is available in both versions but Too Tough To Die isn't on the 1992 release, and the track list listed on the page is for the 1991 Chrysalis edition, which I'll clarify. Hohzer (talk) 20:35, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Chrysalis/Sire Editions

message: Why does the article credit "Palisades Park" to Johnny, Dee Dee & Tommy when the song is a cover song? The song was written by Chuck Barris and originally recorded by Freddy Cannon. I will make the edit to reflect this. Adiosmofo (talk) 15:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Writing Credits
Talk:Story Musgrave

message: Why on earth (no pun intended) is there no mention of Story Musgrave's claims to have seen snake-like beings floating in space? This is an absolutely unacceptable omission. Xmoogle (talk) 12:53, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Source?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.102.146.203 (talk) 02:05, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space snakes 

message: The article only lists six degrees: 
A B.S. in mathematics and statistics from Syracuse University in 1958, an M.B.A. in operations analysis and computer programming from the University of California, Los Angeles in 1959, a B.A. in chemistry from Marietta College in 1960, an M.D. degree from Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons in 1964, an M.S. in physiology and biophysics from the University of Kentucky, and an M.A. in literature from the University of Houston–Clear Lake in 1987.
I did a quick google, there's a variety of webpages that cite 7 degrees, but only one cites the seventh as "psychology", but no dates or alma mater given. Having the article list seven degrees but not list the seventh degree is rather contradictory, and the person who changed it to seven cited a personal dinner, so while my preference would be to edit the opening paragraph to be six until a reference to the seventh degree is found, I also feel that that would be regarded a bit poorly as I don't have an account, and it feels like the kind of petty thing that might end up in an edit war. 104.157.110.71 (talk) 21:47, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Six vs seven degrees
Talk:The Locust (album)

message: Someone can add info that the crowd on the cover is from inner sleeve of a Queen's Album "News of The World" 194.187.72.73 (talk) 21:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reliable source stating this? MrMoustacheMM (talk) 22:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover crowd
Talk:LOL (Blog 27 album)

message: The name ist funnie LOL -58.105.145.70 03:23, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Long Cold Winter

message: While citations in general are needed for this article, it would also be nice if someone had a source that reveals how much Fred Coury played on this album.  This article doesn't mention that Coury was out for a while with Guns N' Roses and didn't play drums on the whole album.  Cozy Powell and Denny Carmassi are both credited on drums (correctly) in this article, but some further info with sources is needed.Frehley72 (talk) 15:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: On the "Long Cold Winter" Infobox, the release date is listed in May of 1988, but on this page:
[]
it's listed as July 5, 1988.  
--CltNC830 (talk) 14:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Stu Francis

message: IMDb says he was born in Bury, Wiki says Bolton, which is correct? TR_Wolf
Have added a citation to Stu saying he was born in Bolton --Sixsevens (talk) 12:11, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Bolton or Bury?

message: Seems to have been a contentious performance.  Is it notable or relevant? Rankersbo (talk) 18:02, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Blackpool Magic Show 2008
Talk:Stu Jackson

message: I semi-protected this article for a week due to the number of anonymous editors swinging by to "weigh in" on his recent suspensions and non-suspensions. --Spike Wilbury  21:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected 

message: Something should also be said about Jackson's decision to suspend Jerry Stackhouse of the Mavericks for the critical fifth game of the NBA finals in 2006. The 210-lb. Stackhouse supposedly fouled the 320-lb. Shaq of the Heat so hard in game 4 that Shaq referred to the hit as less violent than love taps made by his daughters. The Mavs lost game 5 by only 1 point in overtime and sorely missed Stackhouse, their sixth man who was averaging 13 points a game. Had the Mavs won Game 5, they likely would have won the 2006 NBA title and Avery Johnson likely would still be the Mavs' coach.
And then in the 2008 playoffs, Jackson refused to suspend Celtics and Hawks players who went on the floor during an altercation. He also refused to suspend Celtics star Garnett when the latter elbowed an official. But he did suspend Wizards big man Darius Songaila for the pivotal game 6 against Cleveland after Songaila hit LeBron James in what he said was an accidental blow after they got entangled. Adding insult to injury, Jackson waited until the day of Game 6 to suspend Songaila, not giving the Wizards any time to adjust to the change. Usually, such suspensions are announced at least one day before the playoff game. 
The point is Jackson has made a lot of suspect decisions that lead many to question the integrity of the NBA. Jacksonthor (talk) 21:29, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy
Talk:Look-Ka Py Py

message: Should that be addressed in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.213.123.63 (talk) 23:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does the name of the album mean, if anything?
Talk:Stuart Baird

message: * Why is the template for "1978-1987 Superman film series" on the Stuart Baird page? He has worked on more Lethal Weapon movies than he has Superman movies. This seems a little too enthusiastic. He edited the first movie and the Donner portion of the second. He has nothing to do with all the characters and other items included in the Superman template. Perhaps the template should be removed? Master Redyva  ♠  16:53, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Superman (film)|''Superman'']] ? 

message: Maybe I'm missing something, but all I can see from the scan is that a person named Stuart Baird was born in Uxbridge at some time between January and March 1947. It seems to have no detail of the specific date. How can we be sure this is the same Stuart Baird? What was the source for earlier date, 30 November 1947? --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 08:38, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate source
Talk:Stuart Barnes

message: "especially comparing him to modern greats at outside half who can actually tackle."
is not exactly an objective comment in the correct tone for wikipedia. Perhaps a cooment about his "limited tackling ability" or "unwillingness to physically commit to the tackle" would be more appropriate?--217.38.246.254 13:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a good statement, thanks for pointing it out. We have to be careful about what we say about living people; see WP:BLP. If it's not referenced, and may be considered controversial, then it should be removed. - Shudde talk 21:32, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objectivity
Talk:Stuart Baxter

message: Was Stuart born in Birmingham or Wolverhampton? 
http://www.news24.com/Content/xArchive/Sport/Soccer/1088/b534cde2514746c88ac78e65967b13b9/24-03-2004-09-43/Baxter_means_business
Has him as Wolverhampton born.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.32.69.23 (talk) 20:46, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: City of birth 

message: There is a sentence claiming Baxter had favoured Swedish-speaking players, with a link to article #8.
However, having read article #8, the article in question does not even mention anything about
Swedish-speaking players. The article does have Alexe Eremenko Jr. claiming that Baxter favoured
some players and spoke to them only, whereas he said nothing to others. No mention of who these people were, therefore
to claim this article as the source is incorrect, and moreover, the claim has no source. It is thus a fabrication.
Whoever drew the conclusion that Baxter favoured Swedish-speaking players, must have a vivid imagination. Futhermore, it is disgraceful
to label this as a quote by Eremenko, who never said such a thing. Lets stick to facts, instead
of reading between the lines and giving loose interpretations of common interviews.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.193.77.172 (talk) 21:04, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed claim on favouring Swedish-speaking players 
Talk:Stuart Braithwaite

message: Mogway is a band of post-rock, not alternative rock.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.122.255.241 (talk) 14:10, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-rock 

message: Hello Wikipedia experts. I don't know what I'm doing so I offer this information as may be useful for someone who knows how to edit without messing up the page!
The URL for reference #6 resolves with a "page not found".
Possibly change it for https://www.silvermoth.co.uk/about ?
My Best Wishes to you all. 81.148.220.110 (talk) 01:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  cited reference 6 about involvement in the band Silver Moth
Talk:Nokia 6600

message: Should this section really be included in a wiki? I think that it's bordering on advertising since most of the listed applications are payware, and it's subjective anyway. What one person thinks is useful, another might think is useless. 210.84.6.179 13:34, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it would be divided into freeware, shareware, payware, I don't see a problem.--Tomppa 15:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful applications 

message: 6600 is not (yet) supported by gmail app. should we include it? would it be superfluous? You can reply to Kushal One. 202.79.62.21 04:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gmail on mobile -- not available
Talk:Stuart Brisley

message: The following links have been removed from the article per WP:ELNO. These may still be useful the article in the form of citations. -- Ohc ¡digame! 08:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.englandgallery.com/EXHIB_Brisley_2006.htm and http://www.tate.org.uk/audio-arts/volume-4/number-4. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed