Talk:Caught in a Mosh

message: There appears to have been a BBC special album by Anthrax put out by the same name: .  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 15:54, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  further expansion 

message: Please remove unreliable, unsourced, POV information from the article.  Do not remove reliably sourced information to push a POV.  See the appropriate policies and guidelines at Wikipedia:Reliable sources, Wikipedia:Verifiability, and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.  The information twice removed (, ) is (a) cited to a reliable source, (b) verifiable, and (c) neutrally represents a significant view fairly, proportionately and without bias.  Whether anybody thinks or feels any given way about the material preseented in the article, those are tenants of the English Wikipedia, and abidement is compulsory and expected.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 20:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's unfortunate you take it that way, I'm quite serious in my explanations and continued implementations.  Please do not revert reliable sourced information to push a POV.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 15:56, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

text: That would be original research on my part since I have no reliable sources to cite for that information.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 18:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I'm not saying one thing or another; all I'm effectively saying is that "VH1 says this is metal."  I'm not going to interpret that one way or another by assuming what they meant (as that's original research), I'm just going to use the information verbatim and cite it.  We include it to maintain a neutral point of view by "representing significant views fairly, proportionately and without bias."In the grand scheme of things, not critical: but including VH1's categorization of this song as quote "metal" provides the reader with a better and more comprehensive understanding of this topic and its place in the world.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 14:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Says you.  On the other hand, VH1 referes to the song as "metal.  I heartily recommend you refer to policies and guidelines instead of making ultimatums.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 18:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Accusing me of implementing policies and guidelines in this article does not constitute owning this article; were that the case, I would be "owning" every article I edit.  Please, again, do not continue pushing your personal point-of-view upon this article.  Continuing on, I intend to redirect this article to Among the Living, unless anybody has reliable input to bolster its notability as discussed below.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 06:39, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Non-sequitur.  VH1 says "metal" as cited in the article, arguing against that is nonsensical.  Please do not degenerate to personal attacks on the English Wikipedia, that can and will result in a ban.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 06:39, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Aside from being egregiously incivil, you haven't proffered any encyclopedic reason not to include the reliable POV of the VH1 citation.  Please cease denigrating other contributors and instead read up on the policies and guidelines I'm bringing to bear.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 21:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: edit warring

message: I brought up my concern about this article's notability at the talk page here; I only received one reply (and no dissentions) opining that this page should be merged into Among the Living.  I think I agree, but want to bring it up for discussion before doing anything about it.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 19:37, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: notability