Talk:Electrico

message: Hi, I don't mind if you guys engage in an edit war here.  I have no horse in this race, except, please please stop re-introducing the about-to-be-deleted template .  No matter what else you might think about the contents of the article, you won't like the results once that template is actually deleted.  I've tried to add a copy in the versions used by both sides in this war, and even that hasn't seemed to help.  Xtifr tälk 08:34, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I undid it once by accident - sorry about that.  I'm not sure about the next step in resolving the dispute as it is an otherwise non-wikipedia editor involved and not discussing the article.  violet/riga (t) 11:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stop reverting the infobox!

message: Starting this as a new topic, since it's not directly related to the infobox issue.
I see there's been some user talk page discussion, and yes, I see it's one-sided so far.  However, I'd also like to see some discussion here about the specific content that's under dispute.  Even if that ends up being one-sided as well, it will help make it clear to third parties what the dispute is about.  Beyond that, refer to Wikipedia:Resolving disputes, which suggests that the next step is to disengage for a while.  Unless we're dealing with libel here, it won't hurt to have a POV article for a little while.  Xtifr tälk 21:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not really that kind of dispute.  It's a user that is constantly reverting to a version of the article that includes numerous video links and goes against the MOS - it's not allowed and he needs to stop.  He won't discuss it, and you can see from the user's contributions that there is never likely to be anything forthcoming.  violet/riga (t) 21:12, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Going against the MOS is not something that needs to be resolved immediately (unlike, say, libel or WP:BLP violations).  This looks like a perfectly normal dispute to me, and I see nothing that would justify going outside of the normal resolution procedures.  The only other thing I'd say is that if he violates the WP:3RR rule, then you can probably get some admin intervention, but make sure you don't violate that rule yourself.  Xtifr tälk 21:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know you're trying to help but I do know all about this stuff.  Titles do not use camel case and blindly undoing that is not acceptable.  violet/riga (t) 21:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's as may be, but many editors (including myself) consider edit wars a far greater evil than CamelCase titles and inappropriate video links.  The more closely you follow the standard dispute resolution procedures, the more likely you are to get a sympathetic ear when you go to the next step after "disengage for a while".  You may know all about the manual of style (as do I), but I also know something about dispute resolution, both as a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Musicians and as an occasional volunteer at Wikipedia:Third opinion.  And while I'm mostly sympathetic to your arguments, I'm not prepared to take sides as a third party at this point.   has managed to stop short of doing anything blockable so far, so standard dispute resolution guidelines policies still apply.  Xtifr tälk 22:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Minlilin is ignoring discussion attempts and blindly reverting, violating the MOS and OWN.  I'm tempted to protect the page myself but that would be inappropriate.  violet/riga (t) 22:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Resolving disputes

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Electrico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090916073631/http://www.mtvasia.com:80/News/200909/11018442.html to http://www.mtvasia.com/News/200909/11018442.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Electrico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080321133124/http://www.everybodyshere.sg/ to http://www.everybodyshere.sg/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080321133124/http://www.everybodyshere.sg/ to http://www.everybodyshere.sg/
*Added  tag to http://www.mtvasia.com/Videos/music/VOD/M0004U/1/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified