lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Disjunctivism

message: "According to this theory, the only thing common to veridical perceptions and hallucinations is that in a hallucination, the subject of the hallucination cannot tell, via introspection, that he is not having a veridical perception."  So the only thing they have in common is actually a difference. That's a stupid sentence. 86.131.89.40 (talk) 21:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It does seem rather a mess. I am not familiar with McDowell, but I think other material would be innacurate as far as Hinton is concerned. Rather than rejecting sense data "in certain cases", I think JMH rejected them outright. I recall his encouraging me to read Sense and Sensibilia and my memory is that he supported Austin's outright condemnation of sense data. I may look at the papers I have by Michael to confirm my memories and then correct things.--Peter cohen (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I can gather, disjunctivism entails the belief that, unlike a hallucination, a "veridical perception" is somehow the direct perception of an external "third party" — whereas other schools of philosophy would suggest that, from the experiencer's viewpoint, they might as well be identical. However, I'm a computer scientist and might be getting this horribly wrong. Good luck! 86.131.89.40 (talk) 15:09, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

text: "The subject cannot tell, via introspection, that he is not having a veridical perception." is true of both the hallucination and the veridical perception. So they have it in common.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.147.225.222 (talk) 22:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What?
Talk:Andrea O'Reilly

message: There is an internal link to Mothering.  Whatever was originally at Mothering, I am not sure that the redirect to Mother is what those writing this article had in mind originally, given the ideological content of mothering vs motherhood... You may wish to change the link.. MargaretRDonald (talk) 21:23, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mothering
Category talk:Organizations/Archive 1

message: We should trim this down and create a few basic subcategories.
*Artistic
**Artist collectives
**Dance organizations
**Film organizations
**Photography organizations
*Sports organisations
**Sports teams
**Auto racing organizations
**Martial arts organizations
**Motorcyclists organizations
*Charitable
**BBB Wise Giving Alliance
**Fraternal and service organizations
*Religious/Philosophical
**Aesthetic Realism
**Religious faiths, traditions, and movements
**Religious organizations
*Legal
**Law enforcement agencies
**Law organizations
**Criminal organizations
*Educational organizations
**Academic institutions
**History organizations
**Museum organizations
**National academies
**Ornithological organizations
*Government institutions
**Military
**Postal organisations
*Civic and political organizations
**Political organizations
**Animal rights groups
**Appropriate technology for developing countries - Organizations
**International organizations
**LGBT organizations
**Non-governmental organizations
**Pro-life Organizations
*Business organizations
**Agriculture organizations
**Labor unions
**Unions Leave this in the top cat, as it's a type of org, i.e. like Consortia, not a specific one; it just contains the subcats Student's Unions, and Labor Unions. JesseW, the juggling janitor 23:21, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: cat scheme

message: Okay - the old discussion seems to have died down; I'm trying to get it going again because this is chaos! As I'm sure we all agree. 
My take on the above proposal is that it's pretty good but generally creates a subject tree. I propose four total "super categories" for :Category:Organizations that would pick up some of the other as-yet-uncategorized orgs in a fairly simple tree. 
* organizations by geography
** city
** national
** international
** other geography categories that grow up 
* organizations by membership (women, lgbt, etc.)
** professional orgs
** identity orgs (women, lgbt, minorities, etc.)
** supraorgs (orgs with org memberships)
* organizations by subject
** an ordinary subject hierarchy like we have in many other fields that could take advantage of the structural thinking already done for those other categories (items in professional orgs, identity orgs, would be doubly categorized as appropriate; for instance ":Category:Library organizations" would be a "professional organization" in the "orgs by membership" tree and also a "social sciences organization" in the "orgs by subject" tree. 
* organizations by structure - legal status & structure are largely interdependent. This could pick up whatever key distinctions need to be made between nonprofit/NGO/charity versus governmental organizations versus for-profit business organizations versus any other relevant kinds of organizations. 
I note that we should really deal with the non-viable distinction between "charity", "nonprofit", "non-governmental organization", ASAP, since orgs are apt to be categorized anywhere in those categories.
Thoughts? --lquilter 18:51, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: cat scheme, redux
Talk:Zbąszyń

message: I am writing from the JDC archives where I have curated a collection that has some documents that deal with Jewish people expelled from Germany who ended up in Zabszyn.http://search.archives.jdc.org/list.asp?lang=ENG&dlang=ENG&module=search&page=notebook&rsvr=ADMIN@ADMIN¶m=%3Cdlang%3EENG%3C/%3E%3Cnob%3E2%3C/%3E%3Cstart_entry%3E0%3C/%3E%3Crsvr_id%3EADMIN%3C/%3E%3Clang_id%3EENG%3C/%3E%3Cquantity%3E10%3C/%3E%3Cvalue%3Epoland%20%20subject%20matter%20%20refugees%20%20vilna%20%20zbaszyn%20%201938%20%20%201939%20%20general%3C/%3E%3Cindex_name%3EARLFILE%3C/%3E%3Ccollector%3E1%3C/%3E%3Clif%3EARLFILE%3C/%3E%3Crsvr_ser%3E@@2%3C/%3E¶m2=%3Cnum_fields%3E10%3C/%3E%3Cnvf%3E9%3C/%3E%3Cnor%3E15%3C/%3E%3Cnvr%3E3%3C/%3E%3Cnob%3E0%3C/%3E&site=ideaalm It includes correspondence regarding aid to Jewish people and other information about the situation that is specific to Zbaszyn. I think this documentation would benefit and enrich the page, but I wanted to write to get opinions before I made any edits. Any and all thoughts are welcome.
Archivist123 (talk) 15:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentation 

message: "In 1918 it became part of the Second Polish Republic." - not in 1918, but from 17th January 1920 and was from then on a Polish border town -- 151.136.145.30 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 12:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Ostrów Wielkopolski

message: What was this community named when it was in Germany? J S Ayer (talk) 02:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ostrowo, according to German Wikipedia.--Kotniski (talk) 07:09, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  German name 
Talk:Finest Kind

message: Favorable review in Sing Out! added.  What more do you want for folksingers?Pustelnik (talk) 21:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are twelve criteria points listed if you follow this link = Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Criteria for musicians and ensembles which of these points have been addressed? Please also note that by addressing I mean that the point is confirmed by citing a reference from a reliable source. You actually require "multiple non-trivial published works". Tough I know but notability is an important issue for bands. That's why we have WP:MUSIC. Sting_au  Talk 22:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now passes WP:MUSIC. Notability template removed. Article would look nice with a picture don't you think? Don't forget if you upload a picture you need to get the free license for it. Sting_au  Talk 23:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Let Me Think About It

message: Actually the song was originally made by Ida Corr and _then_ there was the mix with Fedde le Grand 
--87.78.69.68 (talk) 17:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Shuhari

message: Any good references to the Go connection? Stephen B Streater (talk) 10:16, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Go 

message: This seems somewhat (very?) similar to the Dreyfus Model (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreyfus_model_of_skill_acquisition). Might it be useful to link between these?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.248.83.2 (talk) 06:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dreyfus Model 

message: The references provided are inaccurate in the dates. Fuhaku Kawakami was born in 1716, yet the article states that Zeami Motokiyo extended this concept, which is impossible since Zeami Motokiyo was born in 1363. At this time it seems the origin is unknown.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.124.209 (talk) 13:06, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin:
Talk:Ricky Jean Francois

message: Ricky JeanFrancois has a 3 year old daughter. DNA confirmed. I will be more than happy to submit that info. Also you can google her Royal Brooklyn JeanFrancois. Wikipedia suppose to state facts and this is a fact. This fact can be proven. Royal born 11-22-14 his first born child. If this is not corrected Wikipedia is posting false information.
KKamp23  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1008:B06B:40B6:C967:A233:D0DB:4C0 (talk) 13:30, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Daughter to Bii
Talk:External validity

message: has anyone noticed the same definition has been given for both internal and external validity.
This article is rife with issues, but that's aside from my current point.  Removed a link to transferability simply because the link was wrong, it went to an article on chemistry instead of Qualitative Statistics. 99.127.42.25 (talk) 11:22, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sultana Kamal

message: Sultana Kamal is one of Bangladesh's foremost human rights activists and an outspoken public intellectual. Her importance goes way beyond notability.--ChaudhryAzan (talk) 06:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Any references for "foremost"? What you're saying doesn't seem to be very concrete. Applesandapples (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: God, why don't you just google Sultana Kamal. You wanted to know if she's notable, she leads a major civil rights group known as the ACLU of Bangladesh.--ChaudhryAzan (talk) 18:24, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion?
Talk:Kirkdale, North Yorkshire

message: Should this page be named Kirkdale, North Yorkshire in line with other articles? Keith D (talk) 22:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done it. Will sort out links.  PamD (talk) 23:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Links all sorted out. PamD (talk) 23:21, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the quick response. Keith D (talk) 23:29, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Ian Beckstead

message: I accidentally hit enter before I could finish but please see Wikipedia:Proposed_deletion_of_biographies_of_living_people#Objecting, a wiki is not a reliable source and cannot negate a BLPPROD and as it wasn't there in the beginning, "any source" part of BLPPROD does not apply. CC: . CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:06, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  restored BLPPROD
Talk:1972 Democratic National Convention

message: Can it really be considered a more contentious convention than the 1968 convention which turned into a riot?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.29.215.136 (talk) 07:00, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "I opened the doors of the Democratic Party and 20 million people walked out." You're sourcing this to JONAH GOLDBERG? Seriously? --1.113.101.155 (talk) 12:41, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote? Really? 
Talk:Gephyrophobia

message: I wonder if this could have a connection to acrophobia and fear of falling. 188.238.88.155 (talk) 19:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection to acrophobia 

message: Text and references copied from Mackinac Bridge to Gephyrophobia.  See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 01:09, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Keeper76

message: User:Keeper76
    run at Tue Jan 8 17:45:21 2008 GMT
Image:                 1
Mainspace              2385
Portal talk:           1
Portal:                5
Talk:                  73
Template:              4
User talk:             239
User:                  181
Wikipedia talk:        5
Wikipedia:             468
avg edits per page     1.37
earliest               02:01, 9 August 2007
number of unique pages 2461
total                  3362
2007/8   41
2007/9   294
2007/10  1057
2007/11  907
2007/12  861
2008/1   202
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
             Mainspace
43 2007 Minnesota Vikings season
20 Joy
15 Sitakunda Upazila
9  Aptronym
9  2007 NFL season
8  Ray Edwards
8  Fay Taylour
7  Jimmy Rollins
7  Grand Theft Auto IV
7  Keeley Creek Natural Area
7  Gerald P. Pulley
7  List of people from Hampton Roads
7  Aundrae Allison
7  Michael Gerber (nonfiction)
6  Muriel Humphrey
          Talk:
4 20-20-20 club
4 Gerald P. Pulley
3 Ken McGregor
3 Boston Red Sox
3 Teflon (disambiguation)
2 Hecate
2 Morris Abrams
2 Butlins
2 Eaubonne
2 Sitakunda Upazila
2 Aptronym
2 Lucky Dube
         Portal:
3 Current events/Sidebar
         Template:
2 2007 NFC North standings
                      User:
126 Keeper76
21  Keeper76/adoption
5   Keeper76/real
4   Keeper76/monobook.js
4   Keeper76/Quotes saved for humor and posterity
4   Keeper76/secret
4   Keeper76/scream
2   EECOOLIEO
2   Keeper76/Well, you ain't never caught a rabbit
    User talk:
28 Keeper76
24 Endlessdan
7  JodyB
7  Mbisanz
6  Shousokutsuu
4  Keilana
4  Djsasso
4  DonnPulley
4  DGG
3  Deiz
3  Finalnight
3  Legotech
3  Ronsax
3  Shannonbramer
3  Yoko ono lives
                           Wikipedia:
43 Disambiguation pages with links/2007-10-18 dump
21 Disambiguation pages with links/2007-08-02 dump
8  Articles for deletion/The Hat
7  Articles for deletion/Robert Poulin
6  Articles for deletion/Mushroom (Mario)
6  Articles for deletion/People Can Change
6  Articles for deletion/Vegalitarianism
5  Articles for deletion/List of Restaurants in the United States
5  Articles for deletion/Copasetic
5  WikiProject Minnesota
5  Articles for deletion/Austin Phantom Manhunt
5  Articles for deletion/Paola Cavalieri
5  Usernames for administrator attention
4  Articles for deletion/Hasland Junior School
4  Articles for deletion/Animal Egalitarianism
          Wikipedia talk:
2 WikiProject League of Copyeditors
2 WikiProject College football
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 17:45, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Keeper76

message: If anyone noticed, I accidentally typed 10/9/9 in one of the edit summaries instead of 10/0/0.   jj137 ♠ 22:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That scared me a bit when that popped up on my watchlist :) Wizardman 22:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake
Talk:El Buscón

message: In addition to Paul the Sharper or The Scavenger and The Swindler, mentioned at the beginning of the article, El Buscón also appeared in English as Pablo de Segovia. The 1892 edition published by T. Fisher Unwin in London under this title is famous for its illustrations by Daniel Vierge. It has an essay on the life and writings of Quevedo by Henry Edward Watts and comments on Vierge's drawings by Joseph Pennell. It contains 20 illustrations by Vierge not included in the French edition mentioned in the section Editions of the work. The title of that edition, not mentioned there, is Histoire de Pablo de Ségovie; the publisher was Bonhoure, Paris. Vierge was unable to finish the illustrations for the Bonhoure edition because he suffered a stroke. His right side was paralyzed, and he could no longer use his right hand. The new illustrations for the Unwin edition were done with his left. As Pennell writes in his "Comments on the Drawings of Daniel Urrabieta Vierge" in Pablo de Segovia, Vierge "simply trained himself to work with his left hand, and to-day, as is proved by the last twenty illustrations in this book ... he is producing drawings which are unsurpassed" (p.iv). --64.134.31.188 (talk) 22:16, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also published in English as ''Pablo de Segovia'' 
Talk:Abney Hall

message: Is this Abney Hall? Because if it is, the place is Grade II* listed. Nev1 (talk) 17:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a remarkably stupid question since the page actually states that it's Abney Hall. Nev1 (talk) 17:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Listed building status

message: Plz someone fix bot so page works as it is vital new information for the peoples because like Abney Garden Teas only has a Facebook page so that is what I need to link to if the wiki page is to provide external linkage to Abney Garden teas cafe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.80.133 (talk) 17:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The removal of the Facebook link was done for a reason: Wikipedia is not here to promote your tearoom. Please read WP:ELNO, WP:PROMO and WP:NOT. Dave.Dunford (talk) 14:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent updates
Talk:Huntingdon and Peterborough

message: Ceremonial County?
Huntingdon and Peterborough is described on this page solely as an administrative county, but as it also had a lord lieutenant, does this not also mean it was a ceremonial county?
Lethal0r (talk) 10:48, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Aresti Catalog

message: The commentary about the nature of Aresti's copyright (original work or compilation) begs a citation, as does the remark about the use of line arrows and triangles.  I couldn't decide if these were WP:POV, WP:OR or just WP:CITE issues.  Can anyone help?  I plan to remove them in a bit if someone doesn't add WP:NPOV substantiation for them.  Jim Ward (talk·stalk) 18:15, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The material I marked earlier is now out, per WP:POV.  Jim Ward (talk·stalk) 18:30, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary about Aresti's copyright 
Talk:Smoke Squadron

message: The link to the Fouga Magister was red, and it seemed a little weird to me the fact that the T-24 link was blue... but T-24 redirects to a soviet WWII tank, not to an aircraft. So I removed the T-24 link. I also fixed the Fouga Magister link, it is working now.
189.15.177.210 (talk) 21:00, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  T-24 wrong link 

message: By all accounts and formalities, the EDA (Air Demonstration Squadron) is a squadron. However, its traditional name in Brazilian parlance is Esquadrilha da Fumaça, which translates to English as "Smoke Flight" (not as in "flight, the activity of flying", but as in "flight, the small amount of aircraft"). Should the article not be renamed? And, if so, should we not redirect from the Smoke Squadron links all over? Please bring some feedback. SrAtoz (talk) 15:08, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squadron vs. Flight
Talk:Wyrzysk

message: Was it part of Germany or of Poland in the time between WWI and WWII ? 134.3.76.108 (talk) 10:43, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: No. 109.151.159.74 (talk) 12:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Citations from Polish "historians", especially in Polish, do not count on the English-language Wikipedia.109.151.159.74 (talk) 12:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwar period ? 

message: The shown coat of arms is not up to date. The correct one can be found on the Polish wiki page for Wyrzysk. MelvinTheRat (talk) 00:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change needed
Talk:Dole Air Race

message: I ran across several pictures in the Library of Congress: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2002721395/ Col. Arthur C. Goebel's "Woolaroc," ...  http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2002721396/ http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2003656134/ but they provide only thumbnails for some reason. Perhaps the copyright status is not clear. W Nowicki (talk) 18:46, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pics 

message: There are markers on the map at the bottom of the article that are for aircraft not mentioned in this article.  It would be nice to know about "Angel of Los Angeles," "Spirit of Oakland," and "PN-9"
Latinsq (talk) 18:38, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notations on map
Talk:Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns

message: You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of  Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by  suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the  Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 16:47, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be great to hear  suggestions of new sources on this topic, for editing this and other articles on Wikipedia. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 02:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing 

message: Thus far this article doesn't even agree on simple issues like verb tense to relate the conclusions of the report. It's probably time to pass through for a rewrite from top to bottom, updating the sources with newer publications that have more analysis of the report's statements. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 13:47, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs a lot of work.
Talk:Ryan Lannon

message: This page will be edited within the next three days to expand this article. Weatherman05071 (talk) 13:26, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding more information 

message: After the end of his hockey career he started teaching at sandwich high school for about a year and a half before being fired 2601:183:282:4C50:81BA:EE9E:458C:98AE (talk) 00:25, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post career
Talk:Dorintosh

message: (Cocopie (talk) 18:10, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Hurricane Holly (1969)

message: Given it is only two lines, I strongly propose a merge. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Merge it. Juliancolton (talk) 18:17, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The overall writing is poor. There's too much on what was expected, and not enough on what actually happened. Why did it weaken? Some of the sentences are downright false - The wave dissipated on September 20th. One, the Infobox says Holly dissipated on the 21st, and two, there's a major difference between Holly dissipating and its parent tropical wave dissipating. BTW, I saw in this newspaper article that the hurricane was scheduled to be part of Project Stormfury - that might be something to research. The entire last section is unsourced. Was there any actual impact? Date formatting is weak, as are overall units. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 17:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Todo