Talk:Sambandar

message: 122.163.47.240 - please discuss the sources and the relevance of the information you want to add here, since two editors are removing your additions at present. Please check that information about Campantar is available in a published source and that it is notable enough to appear in wiki. If so, there is probably already an article that contains information about tufts, Uma etc. Then you can make sure that the information can be found from this page by adding links. Redheylin (talk) 22:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please click on this  so you may see from the first paragraph that citations are required. Then this so you may see that repeatedly inserting this material is unacceptable. Redheylin (talk) 13:46, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

text: NB: The above seems to me to border on an implicit legal threat. This comment has accordingly been reported to WP:LEGAL. See here -- Muzhogg (talk) 01:14, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Extra information

message: As the edit history shows, there have been a large number of edits from various IP addresses with substantially the same intent. The flags I added to the page have finally managed to draw the above comment. Suggestions for procedure welcome. Redheylin (talk) 03:23, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is pretty straightforward, I think, per WP:VERIFY; if, as the anonymous IP claims, there are plenty of references for it, there should be no problem in providing one of them.  Until then, the material shouldn't be re-added to the article.  I notice that the alternate name of the city mentioned here is not mentioned in the article on Sirkazhi.  --Clay Collier (talk) 00:20, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

text: I agree with Clay Collier - see particularlyWP:BURDEN in WP:VERIFY. Should such attempts continue, you might wish to consult WP:SEMI and WP:ROUGH. Good luck. -- Muzhogg (talk) 00:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: PS: given the claimed report of this issue to the FBI (by the same unregistered user? - see above) I have lodged a report  at the admin notice board. -- Muzhogg (talk) 01:16, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Material without citations

message: I tried WP:DRN, but it was closed as premature procedure. I still do not know what is going on with this article, but I don't want this reported to WP:3RR noticeboard. --George Ho (talk) 22:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Note, in response to the recent major changes by multiple different editors here and on a few other pages, I had an SPI run, which turned up about 7 likely sockpuppets, now all blocked (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sivamrutham123). However, the CU who conducted the SPI said that there are several other possible related user not blocked, and the underlying IP range is active. Thus, the disruption might not immediately stop. I've watchlisted the article, but if the disruption continues and I don't act, feel free to let me know directly--semi-protection may be necessary. The thing is, it may well be that some of what this user(s) want to add may be acceptable, but only if it's properly cited and they actually engage in discussion here. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:30, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That didn't last long. I blocked another sock, and semi-protected the article for a week. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:54, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits discussion 

message: Sambandar was a saivaite saint and was not a Brahmin. What are the sources that say that he was a Brahmin? If he was a Brahmin he would have composed the poems in Sanskrit and not in Tamil. And Brahmins normally wear  thread across their chest but in ancient bronze and stone statues of Sambandhar the thread across his chest is not seen. Please understand the caste system in India is very sensitive and please do not conclude the caste without proper reliable sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunkumarbalakrishnan (talk • contribs) 14:36, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Sambandar a Brahmin? 

message: "Please change The legend goes on to state that with Sambandar's consent, the king massacred around 8000 Jains to NONE.
V.malayaman (talk) 14:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: as you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 15:15, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 September 2014 

message: "please change He declined due to knowledge that he would soon die to He declined due to knowledge that he would soon attain mukthi."
V.malayaman (talk) 14:55, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 September 2014 

message: change "Sambandar died with Shiva in the Tamil month of "Vaigasi" at the age of sixteen at his wedding". to "Sambandar realized Mukthi in the Tamil month of "Vaigasi" at the age of sixteen during his wedding as per Periyapuranam". Varooran (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: See WP:EUPHEMISM. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 February 2023