Talk:Alexander Mashkevitch

message: This Billionaire has been arrested in Turkey with underage prostitutes but released on red passport. http://www.milliyet.com.tr/savarona-ve-gizemli-adam/guneri-civaoglu/siyaset/yazardetay/02.10.2010/1296356/default.htm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.146.91.145 (talk) 04:55, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Busted in Turkey

message: This seems to be an unsubstantiated rumor reprinted in an online newsletter. Kazakhstan's GDP is $168 Billion, while ENRC's total revenues are around $4 Billion, with the Kazakhstani government holding about a quarter stake in the company. Mashkevich's total net worth is around $1 billion. So how does this equal one-fourth of Kazakhstan's economy? Konchevnik81 (talk) 04:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Control of One-Fourth of Kazakhstan's Economy

message: who wrote this article? he? his wife?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.132.193.107 (talk) 19:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hagiography 

message: In its current form this article is poorly formatted and seems to largely promotional. I am reverting to an earlier, better sourced version for the time being.141.163.196.7 (talk) 23:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's good. As I mentioned a little while ago, some user was editing the article to give this guy a more favorable review (see article history). These changes was made over several months without anyone noticing them. I would recommend you all to put this article in your watchlist, just to make sure that this don't happen again. Bricklayer (talk) 15:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sbakuria has put the article back to how it was (poorly formatted and promotional), I am reverting again and I'll leave a message on his/her talk page explaining myself. I hope this is acceptable. 141.163.196.7 (talk) 17:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, of course and it's a absolutely correct decision to make this user aware of the problem. I once again had to revert this user's edit. Bricklayer (talk) 21:09, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Another revert, I think some kind protection for the article should be requested, or some third party intervention to resolve this conflict, but I'm unsure about how to achieve this. I will admit that there are issues with the version I have reverted to and it does need improvements, but I think this reversion problem should be settled first, then we can move forward with improving the article. If only Sbakuria would detail his/her concerns on this talk page. I'll leave another message with Sbakuria. 141.163.196.7 (talk) 01:28, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted to the correctly formatted version. PhilKnight (talk) 20:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And again. I think a request for comment on user conduct could be the next step. PhilKnight (talk) 15:27, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  An RFC concerning Sbakuria has been made Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Sbakuria. Rtdixon86 (talk) 20:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 

message: Having looked at the link at the top of Sbakuria's version, I think there might be an issue with copyright. The first section at least, appears to have been cut-and-pasted from the website. Opinions? Rtdixon86 (talk) 20:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's indeed a problem too. I believe however that the biggest issue with Sbakuria's version is that it's NPOV and promotional, leaving out the serious accusations that has been made in the past. Anyone knows how to speed up process on the case regarding this user? Bricklayer (talk) 14:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we may have to wait for the RFC (30 days I think) to run its course, then look at arbitration. However, the copyright issue may be a quicker way of stopping Sbakuria's edits. I'll investigate it. More soon. 141.163.196.7 (talk) 15:13, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Sorry, forgot to log in when signing the above. I just want to suggest being careful when reverting Sbakuria's changes because of the Three-Revert Rule, looking at the edit history, there may a danger of falling into that trap. Rtdixon86 (talk) 15:18, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the response and yeah, that sounds like a good idea to me. Also, thank you for making me aware of the Three-Revert Rule. It all makes sense to me (this ended up sounding rather ironic, but I mean it). Bricklayer (talk) 21:45, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Violation? 

message: I've placed the other version here Talk:Alexander Mashkevitch/Temp for the time being.Rtdixon86 (talk) 15:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary Alternative 

message: I'm attmepting to improve the references and find further sources so that the claims made in the article are on firmer ground.  Rtdixon86 (talk) 15:43, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving references

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Alexander Mashkevitch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071026091634/http://www.ncsj.org/AuxPages/101804JTA_Mashkevich.shtml to http://www.ncsj.org/AuxPages/101804JTA_Mashkevich.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011232308/http://www.ncsj.org/AuxPages/102902Haaretz.shtml to http://www.ncsj.org/AuxPages/102902Haaretz.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified