lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Much the Miller's Son

message: In the article it says first that he joined the outlaws after he killed a deer, and then later on that it was this action that made them outlaws. Seems somewhat contradictory, but what is correct? Bjelleklang  -  talk 16:26, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The trouble with mythic characters is there isn't usually a "correct" account, but lots of partially or entirely contradictory ones. To the best of my knowledge, though, the second version is unique to the TV series Robin of Sherwood. Daibhid C 22:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the movie Adventures of Robin Hood, Robin intervened when Much had been caught after shooting a deer, which is when the action really started.  Goldfritha 22:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This beginning is also used in the 1991 TV Movie, which makes at least three modern versions of Robin Hood where Much is to blame for Robin being outlawed.  It's possible they are all copying the Errol Flynn version, but it seems a pretty standard part of the tale these days. Lordjim13 13:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

text: It first seems to crop up -- with Will, not Much -- in Leigh Hunt's 1820 account. I'm sure there are a few pre-1938 instances of Much being in that story, but I'd suspect it was the Flynn film that popularized it.--Puckrobin (talk) 19:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Anything? 195.187.108.4 (talk) 18:20, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology?
Talk:Dagstuhl

message: Note: Schloss Dagstuhl is the original historic building, "Dagstuhl" — or Internationales Begegnungs- und Forschungszentrum für Informatik (IBFI) — is a computer science conference centre based in the schloss and an attached purpose built building. Dagstuhl is a generally used name (easier to remember!). — Jonathan Bowen 16:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

message: The building appears to have some history itself relating to local landowners; some of that should be placed upon this page too. Donal Fellows (talk) 13:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. - Micge (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History needed
Talk:Yoel Rephaeli

message: Yoel Rephaeli is one of the leading experts on the topic of SZ effect (this is demonstrated by searching "Sunyaev Zeldovich" in google Scholar- his review article comes first).  The SZ effect is an extremely important topic in cosmology due to its implications in the formation of the present universe.  Therefore, I believe he should be included in Wikipedia
:Fair enough, he seems to be genuine, I'm removing the tag, though I'm adding the stub tag back, it's hardly an exhaustive article as it is. Equendil 16:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Many thanks to the many contributors to this original page : it has now been translated into FR:. Hop ! Kikuyu3 (talk) 16:23, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated to FR: 

message: Anyone knows his year of birth? Any reference? Sofia Koutsouveli (talk) 16:02, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth? 
Talk:2003 FIFA Women's World Cup

message: Hello guys! Group C venues were reversed for some of the Sept. 27th Games. Germany-Argentina was actually at RFK (I was there, and it was painful for the Argentine women!)
This confirms things: http://soccernet.espn.go.com/wwc/venue?id=1422&lang=us (you'll see the Canada/Japan Game under Foxboro) Sabine01 16:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: USA CAME THIRD CANADA FOURTH Can someone switch it i don't understand it thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.29.22.41 (talk) 00:45, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The table for the draw seems to be messed up, but I'm confused by the cited source. It appears that Pot 3 may have had only three teams and Pot 4 had five, but I'm not sure whether that's correct. The cited source also doesn't include the US and China in Pot 1 because it says as the two hosts, they were automatically slotted in as A1 and D1 (so they may not have need to be assigned to a pot at all). Someone else was messing with the draw table and I initially tried to fix it before discovering that introduced potential confusion. Can someone who is more familiar with the way FIFA handles this procedure take a look and figure out what was going on in 2003 and then clean up the table here? Thanks in advance. 1995hoo (talk) 13:55, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draw 

message: The redirect FIFA 2003 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  O.N.R. (talk) 23:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:FIFA 2003]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:ISO 690

message: Examples? --Abdull 16:45, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled 

message: * See the following comment
** cur | prev)  02:14, 12 April 2010 222.67.203.108 (talk) (3,239 bytes) (→See also:  -- this link should not be disabled until the references of the article are properly cited) (undo) 
at
** http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ISO_13485&action=history
--222.67.203.108 (talk) 02:23, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest the wiki admin to regulate the article for the following reasons..... 

message: * http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=43320
* http://www.iso.org/iso/products/standards/catalogue_ics_browse.htm?ICS1=01&ICS2=140&ICS3=20&
It looks that the standard publishing has been messy, as its version control isn't neat at all
--222.67.203.108 (talk) 02:36, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info from ISO site.... 

message: Google scholar real.....????...as only few of English publications are there, which is unusual and which is not proportional to the English-speaking population
* http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?start=0&q=allintitle:+ISO+690&hl=en&as_sdt=2000
--222.64.31.231 (talk) 04:25, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the info from ..... 

message: * http://www.google.com.hk/search?num=10&hl=en&q=allintitle%3A%20ISO%20690%20filetype%3Apdf&sa=N&tab=sw
--222.64.31.231 (talk) 04:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info of the topic from general public views..... 

message: * http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&q=ISO+690-2+filetype%3Apdf+site%3Awww.lac-bac.gc.ca&btnG=Search&meta=&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
--58.38.41.252 (talk) 05:55, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who and Where are responsible for the standard....???  

message: The first two links seem to be broken:
*Excerpts from ISO 690:1987 Information and documentation -- Bibliographic references - Content, form and structure
*Excerpts from ISO 690-2:1987 Information and documentation -- Bibliographic references -- Part 2: Electronic documents or parts thereof
--Apoloduvalis (talk) 14:47, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Koreagate

message: Was Koreagate the first time the suffix "-gate" was used to mean "Scandal" post-Watergate? john k 16:52, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Template talk:Canadian Cabinet

message: I think that the current template that lists the various members of the Cabinet is incorrect on a couple of points.  First, it refers to the Cabinet of Canada as "the Cabinet of the Prime Minister of Canada", and second, Harper himself is not listed.  While the Cabinet is usually refered by the name of the first minister, the idea of primus inter pares is still in tact (in theory), so it is not "his" Cabinet; Harper is a member of, and also chairman of, a body of ministers called by the Governor General to advise the Crown.
Unlike, for example, President Bush, or any other president, whose Cabinet is formally subordinate to him (the whole Canadian template appears to have been inspired by the American one, with "Prime Minister of Canada" plugged in in place of "President of the United States", without taking in to account differences in constitutional theory) and separate from his Office, Harper is the chairman of the Cabinet, and is thus also a member of that body.  So he should be listed on the template as a member of the Cabinet (which I would suggest be labeled "Current Members of the Cabinet of Canada."
CaptainCanada 16:53, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cabinet Template
Talk:Quem quaeritis?

message: Literally I should think that "Responsio. Jesum Nazarenum crucifixum, o caelicolae." meant "Answer: [We seek] the crucified Jesuz of Nazareth, o heavenly beings." Haukur 16:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then please change it. I don't read Latin; it's just the translation I found.--Cassmus 19:32, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's preferable to use published translations and I'm not much of a Latinist :) Haukur 19:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: The following statement does not accurately reflect the actual various reports: In the canonical gospels it is Mary Magdalene, Joanna, Mary (the mother of James), and "other women" who were present at this event.. Joanna appears only in Luke, etc. Mary, mother of James is oblique. --Wetman (talk) 03:04, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Staffage'' at the Crucifixion
Talk:Anna Pavlovna of Russia

message: Is this the basis for the character of Anna Pavlona in War and Peace?
No, she is not the basis for the character of Anna  Pavlovna Sherer in "War and Peace" of Leo Tolstoy.
Moreover, Leo Tolstoy meant not Peace but World in the title of his novel. Both words have become spelled the same in Russia after 1918, but Tolstoy wrote "World". He meant the court world as well...
The grand duchess might not behave like Sherer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.131.84.202 (talk) 20:57, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: War and Peace

message: This article was in its correct place, as she was a queen consort. A user, without even writing a reason for such move, moved this last October to a place in contravention to NC. This should be at Anna Pavlovna of Russia.
*Support. As nominator Henq 15:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. —Nightstallion (?) 19:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move Request
Talk:Sordes

message: I ask user:4.152.9.82 to have a little more care with his/hers editing. Thanks for your contributions but this article is still a stub and it has no sources: references, external links, bibliography, etc. Until any sources are added to the article, please don't remove the tags. If you register a username it will be much easier to coordinate with you.
--Francisco Valverde 13:34, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please 

message: Are we sure that sordes means "devil" in Greek?  Widsith 08:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed it does not. The name is Latin and only an indirect reference to evil spirits.--MWAK (talk) 19:07, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Wouldn't this all be irrelevant, given that first name takes priority? Or does gender override that? Crimsonraptor | (Contact me) Dumpster dive if you must 20:23, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It does.--MWAK (talk) 09:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Masculine/feminine naming
Talk:Lincoln M. Alexander Parkway

message: It is my belief that Hwy 6 was never a legal co-designation with the Linc. Hamilton just put up 6 shields along the route. Pepsi90919 16:41, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highway 6 

message: Do we *really* need this list on this article?  I can almost see how the roads on the escarpment might be useful, but the lower city roads?  In an encyclopedic entry?  Also, Limeridge Road isn't useful as an alternate route as, since the completion of the Linc, it doesn't go straight through any of the roads that connect with the Linc.  Fantasticmio (talk) 17:25, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parallel Roads 

message: http://maps.google.ca/?ll=43.196604,-79.829364&spn=0.009761,0.032573&t=h&z=15&vpsrc=6&layer=c&cbll=43.196599,-79.829374&panoid=rrdvpBkSsGEISa9Bd-vi4g&cbp=11,45.56,,2,-1.93
http://maps.google.ca/?ll=43.202517,-79.829922&spn=0.00976,0.032573&t=h&vpsrc=6&layer=c&cbll=43.202522,-79.829902&panoid=rHd-j8YYGV3jVdwXWbN5yw&cbp=11,325.61,,0,-0.83&z=15
http://maps.google.ca/?ll=43.20308,-79.830437&spn=0.00976,0.032573&t=h&vpsrc=6&layer=c&cbll=43.203077,-79.830439&panoid=Qffv_7yIWPElwvgyq2vHAg&cbp=11,175.2,,1,-0.65&z=15
Darnall Road is officially on the RHVP and its last exit, not the Linc.  I've reverted the article to my previous edit.  One can take a look at the linked streetview shots to see the Begins signage and their location for themselves.
:If that's so, would you mind adding the image to the Red Hill Valley Parkway article? I worked hard to get the photographer to release it for use on Wikipedia. Haljackey (talk)
::I removed it from the Linc article with the intention of putting into the RHVP article but stepped away from the computer and forgot to add it.  It's a nice photo, wouldn't want to see it orphaned. Snickerdo (talk) 07:42, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So which article should File:The Linc.jpg go then? It took me a long time to get permission to use the file. Haljackey (talk) 16:47, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The city of Hamilton's signage disagrees with you.  It doesn't matter what part of of what highway was constructed where.  Hamilton signs Dartnall Road as part of the RHVP, and the above images show it as such.  This is NOT nonsense.  If someone can come up with an actual document from the City of Hamilton post-RHVP that shows what road is where, fine.  Otherwise, the signage that I posted here clearly indicates that Dartnall Road is on the RHVP, not the Linc - regardless of the fact that it was constructed as part of the Linc project. Snickerdo (talk) 16:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  should back this up. Dartnall is the dividing line. No reason the photo can't be used in both articles though. - Floydian τ ¢ 05:12, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminus
Talk:Marcus Constantine

message: The novels are not canon.  Information from them should not be included.  70.53.110.76 20:51, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the--? 
Talk:Netherton, Merseyside

message: This article needs a complete rewrite. Help me if you can! --Sunholm(talk)  17:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've re-written to some extent. Unfortunately Netherton is not a particularly interesting place so there is little to write about it. As I've put in the article it's mostly housing, so little of note happens there. I'll try and improve some more if I can. Dancarney 23:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete rewrite
Talk:Hampton Loade railway station

message: " This is because their would be problems with finding a "path" for the service if it stopped at the station. The train stops at the station during all other timetables the railway operates except the railways "Festive Season Service", during this timetable the train also dosn't stop at the station. "
Irrelevant to the article's subject, unsourced, poorly written and factually incorrect. Please don't put it back on again. WaltTFB (talk) 09:19, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Severn Valley Limited 

message: Can someone who knows more about the "Paddock" than me please extend the section I've write about it, thank you?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.215.196.2 (talk) 17:51, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paddock railway section 

message: Please don't edit the section of started to write about this subject yet because I havn't finished it yet, thankyou.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.215.196.2 (talk) 18:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Signaling
Template talk:Schools of poetry

message: I like the template, but it seems like some of the entries at the moment don't link to specific articles about poetry; for example 'Absurdism'.  Ideally, we should put this template at the bottom of each page it links to, as it is a navigation template.  I'll make a start at adding it to the links which are genuinely about poetry.  We should probably think about making new articles with titles such as 'Absurdist poetry' for the other items. Stumps 17:21, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - I'd run out of steam by the time I got the template done. Sam 17:41, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tidy template and need for new articles

message: We've got a very Western oriented list of schools here - I'll see what I can add, but it would make sense to add schools from other cultures as well.  Sam 14:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. We might as well start some stub articles on missing schools. Stumps 14:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Western oriented
Talk:Aeration

message: aeration in german does not have the same meaning
the proper translation for aeration is 'Belüftung'
but I don't know how to change that (yet) Walter Hartmann 00:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to german wiki 

message: The article appeared to be hijacked by the company "FarmTech" who were using it as a forum for advertising their products and services. I removed verbiage which appeared to be taken straight from their marketing program, but retained an extensive quote attributed to a director of the company.
137.241.250.100 (talk) 13:40, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AERATION - The Company 
Talk:Al Hirt

message: hello, 
just wanted to know why my update of family names was deleted yesterday from this page. how do these need to be verified so that they stay? (these are my family members)
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by BrooklynOne (talk • contribs) 17:25, 1 June 2006   (UTC)
Who are you? This is Justin, his great grandson. (Hiphopchamp)
:This article is lacking sources already.  The policy is here, Wikipedia:Verifiability.  So anyone may delete your edits since you provide no cited sources.  Also there's the question of how much of the family tree should be in an encyclopedia article. -- OnPatrol 02:04, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the just added claim that Hirt was on a float "as Mardi Gras King". He certainly did not reign as Rex; if he was monarch of a krewe, specify which one. -- Infrogmation 16:34, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Carnival incident

message: I would suggest removing the family history again.  As is, it reads more like an obituary than an encyclopedia article.
67.132.198.226 19:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia editors are not researchers in this sense. In fact, "original research" is strictly forbidden at Wikipedia. Wikipedia articles are merely compilations of pre-existing published material. This is necessary because Wikipedia bills itself as "the free encyclopedia anyone can edit". Real research must be left to professionals, and professionals require payment. If you're really part of Hirt's extended family (there's no way to verify that here) and have first-hand information about Hirt you're anxious to publicize, then you can try to track down a Hirt biographer or write your own Hirt biography and try to interest a publisher. At Wikipedia all editors are equal and effectively anonymous and all editors must provide citations from reputable published sources. Complaining won't change that. TheScotch (talk) 07:16, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: family history

message: Why hasn't this been noted in the citing? 01:16, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: He's dead?

message: I was wondering if anyone could identify where this (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bd0fgpN_Rcg) appearence is from? Some of the commenters mentioned Al had his own show. I am skeptical of this idea as I cannot find any other information on the Internet to support it.
Anyone know anything?
24.60.237.151 (talk) 07:43, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Television show appearance? 

message: The article fails to mention that Al Hirt is featured on the "Viva Max!" soundtrack, released in 1970.
See: http://www.discogs.com/Al-Hirt-Hugo-Montenegro-Viva-Max/release/3090933
72.177.110.205 (talk) 03:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viva Max! not included 

message: The article mentions that Al was playing professionally at 16, often with his friend Pete Fountain (seems unlikely since Pete was 8 years younger) 174.106.200.28 (talk) 15:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Al at 16 playing with Pete Fountain
Talk:Filip Stojanovski

message: * I do not know this person; it appears this article may have been created in the spirit of WP:VAIN.  However, I think this article may be merged with Task Force for National Strategy for Information Society Development, though the validity of that article is also suspect.
Just for reference, the person who wrote the article (Razvigor) is Filip Stojanovski himself. He uses the same nickname on his blog. I think the article should be deleted.
:Merged. - Francis Tyers · 10:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Rebellion of the Alpujarras (1568–1571)

message: Moriscos or Mudejars.
After reference to the Wiki page on Moriscos, there seems to be a conflict of terms.
Here Morisco is deemed to mean those Muslims living in Spain before the expulsion. However, the Morisco page states that Moriscos are Chritstians who once were Iberian Muslims.
A definition of terms would be appreciated.
Sven.
This article does not sufficiently cite sources, and seems to include personal POV and bias. Please consider revising.
Baseline24 (talk) 05:18, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

message: This is not an "ordinary" revolt that is limited to the level of populace, peasants or nobility.
And not a revolt against certain measures, or certain advisors, but a fully fledged secession and independence war. 
They proclaimed their own king, Aben Hommeya, who was a descendant of Moorish kings in a straight line. In dynastical terms we would even have a legitimate ruler here!
Intellectuals of all times may have chosen to call it a revolt, and with the derisive term Morisco connected to it, but just look at the facts: this is a secession, coupled with an independence war. The term Morisco is worse than calling someone "negro" or "eskimo" because it became in use as a deliberately meant derisive term by one of the parties involved, and therefore lacking neutrality, including as a wikipedia article by people who should have known better. 
I understand though that the term Morisco is very common in use, and not meant derisively by those modern people who are ignorant of the real facts.
Still, I propose, from now on, to call it the Moorish Independence War.
Both for politically correct reasons, and for the accuracy of the use of language in historiography. We have the same right to give it a name as anyone before us. It's up to us to set this straight for future generations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.208.84.44 (talk) 15:05, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: better call it Moorish independence War 

message: "The second rebellion led to the expulsion of almost all Moors (or "Moriscos") from the city and province and marked the end of Islamic presence in Spain."
This is wrong. The Moriscos from the Kingdom of Granada were scattered over the rest of Spain, but the expulsion of all Moriscos from Spain (ending Islamic presence in Spain) was only decreed in 1609, several decades after the end of the second rebellion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.85.55.171 (talk) 11:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake 'end of Islamic presence' 

message: The article currently has a number of uncited statements of opinion, such as "". These should be cited or removed. DES (talk) 12:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible OR