lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ninth Street station (PATH)

message: Why are a couple of the names in weird colours? And the yellow one is hard to read because of that. -- SGBailey 00:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The "weird" colours represent the colours of the different lines. See the main PATH article. Darkcore 01:01, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't know why Sixth Ave (B D F M) subway tracks are shown in the station layout. This station is located under Christopher St, not Sixth Ave. The Eighth Ave (A C E) subway crosses over the east end of the station at close to a right angle, and the Sixth Ave subway crosses under the foot passage between the street entrance and the platform, but neither seems relevant.  JoeBrennan (talk) 18:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Station Layout

message: Should this article be moved to Ninth Street station (PATH) or do we have a good reason to keep this exception on top of it not being part of the NYCS? Cards84664 23:18, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Cards84664, per WP:ORDINAL, I think this should indeed be moved to Ninth Street station (PATH). – Epicgenius (talk) 23:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

text: I know "9th Street" is the actual name, but for consistency sake it's a MOS issue, just like how Second Avenue station is actually "2nd Avenue" and so on. Cards84664 13:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it just sticks out like a sore thumb compared to the other numbered-street named PATH stations, which is why I mentioned the "similar quantities" item from MOS:NUMNOTES. Generally I think the "spell out numbers as words" idea is an outdated concept based on a false sense of formality. Heck, I literally said once on the MOS talk page that we should use numerals in text more often because they're universal and someone else said it would be like using slang! Called him out for that nonsense. But it's not a big deal to me. oknazevad (talk) 15:15, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:John Peterman

message: John Peterman is one of the most famous catalog entrepreneurs in the world and deserves his own page separated from Seinfeld. Websiteadvice 01:00, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article needs to make up its mind. Sfahey 16:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2nd base or 3rd

message: Hellow fellow Wikipedians,
I've suggested the section "The J. Peterman Company" be split into a separate page. I believe the section is substantial and has enough information about the company to be its own page. The rest of the article can stand by itself in detailing the life of John Peterman. In addition, "The J. Peterman Company" section disrupts the flow of the article about John Peterman as it switches perspective to the company's history and away from the entry about John Peterman. However, I would like your feedback and discussion about the split. Please take a moment to review and let me know what you think.
Thanks, Kelsey246! (talk) 16:13, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split "The J. Peterman Company" Section into its Own Page
Talk:Trey Lorenz

message: Yawn. Another moderately well-known person associated with Mariah Carey whose Wikipedia article is devoted almost exclusively to their relationship with her. Extraordinary Machine 01:01, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup tag 

message: Featured prominently on the song 'Tell Mell' as a backup singer to Amel Larrieux  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.231.232.62 (talk) 21:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groove Theory Work 

message: Homosexual  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.251.64.118 (talk) 14:38, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexual orienatation 
Talk:Scouting in Tennessee

message: Would Wikipedians entertain the idea of having the Councils-by-state sections recategorized to "Scouting in Arizona", "Scouting in Washington", and so on, rather than a list of every council and district? The reason I would like this considered is 
1) no other country's Scouting articles are divided into such minute details (except for The Scout Association of Hong Kong, and really, is that much minutiae important or interesting to the reader?)
2) many councils that a reader may choose to look up, like the Fitchburg Area Council of Massachusetts or the Vigilante Area Council of Montana, went extinct 30+ years ago, yet may be of interest in a more state-based article
3) many states like Alaska share a communal Scout history, only fairly recently being broken into smaller councils, others like North Dakota had several merged into one, and some Scouting histories are better told encompassing an entire state. The fact that Scouts in California prior to the charter of the BSA were the youth arm of the California Highway Patrol, or the fact that Connecticut, while having only eight counties, has had 22 councils over the course of its history, would be well-included in a statewide article
Chris 01:03, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As written, this article is essentially an annotated collection of external links. It is not an encyclopedia article. It could be improved by writing some more informational content and converting those links to reference citations to support the content.--orlady 19:00, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have started on this, and have added a maintained tag. If you would like to help on this, please add yourself to the tag.  I am only familiar with the BSA side, and would like some help with Girls Scouts, and any other scouting organization in Tennessee.  What does everyone think being an overview with links directing to the specific councils pages(that have not been created yet)??   Click23 (talk) 15:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup needed

message: I feel like some of the Boy Scouting councils need their own Wikipedia pages. Some of them already do, looks like it needs to be consistent.
Following are needed:
*Cherokee Area Council
*Wikipedia:Requested_articles/Other#Middle_Tennessee_Council- Already started request. See link to push process.
*Sequoyah Council
*West Tennessee Area Council
I don't know about the Girl Scouts very much, but they might need their own articles as well:
*Girl Scouts of Greater Atlanta
*Girl Scouts Heart of the South
*Girl Scouts of Middle Tennessee
*Girl Scout Council of the Southern Appalachians
Thankyou!  mrwoogi010  Talk 02:50, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Middle Tennessee Council Article has been finished. mrwoogi010  Talk 15:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Own Council Articles
Talk:Scream 3

message: I did a heavy rewrite on many of the trivia bits because almost all of them were copied verbatim from those on IMDb. I hate when people do that. I also removed a couple because they seemed too weak to be noteworthy. I wanted to get rid of a couple others, like the casting, but that's just because I find that information boring, but it maybe notable nontheless. I also took a major slice out of the John Milton thing. IMDb may not have original research issues, but we do. --Bacteria 01:04, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As that is not explained here, I am rvt to put them backMikereichold 03:10, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  anon removed images 

message: Currently, the film is described a horror-comedy. I fail to see the comedy part. Is this something official? Lots42 (talk) 09:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comedy? 

message: Is this noteworthy 
https://screenrant.com/scream-3-movie-deleted-ending-bad-worse-reason/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.198.17 (talk) 20:40, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Ending
Talk:Auricularia cornea

message: The name of this species does not much the name in chinese. the real name is "hairy wood ear",and the Cloud ear fungus also refer to Auricularia auricula-judae.--218.244.60.17 01:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a lot of controversy about this on the Internet, on Chinese language and English language sites, especially about which of the Chinese names matches to which of the 2 Latin species names.  Unless we can get 100% confirmation, it's a difficult problem to deal with.  Badagnani 01:26, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is "Peziza" a former name for this? Badagnani 11:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Peziza is a different genus of fungi which look similar.    Alan Rockefeller (Talk - contribs) 22:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peziza
Talk:Laminarin

message: Could somebody please help me to expand this page??
--BorisFromStockdale 01:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

message: It says it's "a linear polysaccharide" but it says it's 3 times as cross linked as glycogen which is described as 'branched'.  Could we says this one is 'heavily crosslinked' or 'highly branching' ? Rod57 (talk) 23:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  linear
Talk:Scouting in Idaho

message: Would Wikipedians entertain the idea of having the Councils-by-state sections recategorized to "Scouting in Arizona", "Scouting in Washington", and so on, rather than a list of every council and district? The reason I would like this considered is 
1) no other country's Scouting articles are divided into such minute details (except for The Scout Association of Hong Kong, and really, is that much minutiae important or interesting to the reader?)
2) many councils that a reader may choose to look up, like the Fitchburg Area Council of Massachusetts or the Vigilante Area Council of Montana, went extinct 30+ years ago, yet may be of interest in a more state-based article
3) many states like Alaska share a communal Scout history, only fairly recently being broken into smaller councils, others like North Dakota had several merged into one, and some Scouting histories are better told encompassing an entire state. The fact that Scouts in California prior to the charter of the BSA were the youth arm of the California Highway Patrol, or the fact that Connecticut, while having only eight counties, has had 22 councils over the course of its history, would be well-included in a statewide article
Chris 01:11, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Councils-by-state 

message: Support Cedar Ridge merege to here.Rlevse 02:14, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Rachel Maddow mentioned some sort of sexual abuse scandal involving the Boy Scouts in Idaho and Mr. VanDersloot (no way I spelled that right). Ought it to be mentioned here? Or is it mentioned elsewhere? Paul, in Saudi (talk) 09:19, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sex Abuse Scandal?
Template talk:Infobox holiday

message: So the decision to have a standardized yet arbitrary coloring based on the holiday type dates to 2006 because it seems editors were adding custom colors to every holiday infobox. I don't think we should continue this practice.
* The logic is quite limited in scope. It requires incredibly specific values that miss a lot of valid uses. For example, Juneteenth has no coloring because the value is "Federal", when it should get light purple I guess since it's a national American holiday.
* The selection of categories is not so universal either. We have colors for the world's major religions, and what do the rest get? Pagan? Ethnic? Shintoism, which is only local to Japan, gets a special color, but the international Baháʼí Faith with nearly 5 million adherents does not? And only some of the East Asian religions have their own colors, not all.
* The secular color doesn't make a lot of sense, given that most commercial, cultural, national, etc., holidays are secular in nature, too.
* This is a way to disseminate information that only editors (or absolute diehard readers) will understand. Readers will need to visit a lot of holiday articles before they can come to the conclusion that yellow represents a commercial holiday, lavender represents a Christian one, etc.
* Finally, this consensus is just really old, established at a time when apparently . This is not the case anymore; color is not used at all in major infoboxes, such as Person and Film, and to a much lesser degree in infoboxes that still use custom shading.
I don't think colors should be used in this infobox anymore. Thrakkx (talk) 20:43, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Many of the holidays are religious. In line with Template:Infobox deity/doc, it easier to distinguish festivals with colours. Reverted the WP:BOLD move and restored long term consensus for colours. --Redtigerxyz  Talk  16:18, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type parameter governing an arbitrary color 

message: Can someone please tell me why the date for National Memorial Service for War Dead appears linked, while Independence Day (United States) does not?
The former is a violation of MOS:OVERLINK, but I can't figure out how to unlink the date.
Thanks! 1980fast (talk) 00:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date field: linked or not linked? 

message: This template takes a duration parameter, but never displays anything because of it.  It looks like this used to be used for some categorization that no longer exists.  Should we remove this parameter?  Display it in the infobox?  Something else?LittlePuppers (talk) 22:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duration
Talk:Brampton Christian School

message: *Nice looking ...but more info please Victuallers 09:16, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Driving while black

message: Should be a paragraph in "Variations", like the rest. I can't copy or paste. I know somebody out there can; will it be you? InedibleHulk (talk) 20:40, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Biking while black" is a clear variation 

message: The problem with the use of studies by the ACLU is that first of all the ACLU being a special interest political group implies that their "studies" aren't trustworthy, given that they aren't published in any scientific journal, and aren't clearly peer reviewed. Therefore to the extent that we call the ACLU's data a "study" it is highly dubious. Second of all, in the data calculations section of the refrence for the Florida section,they fail to provide all of the necessary statistical data in order for the findings to be properly subejct to peer review. (no p-values, no control data for whites, etc.). For that reason I will insert the dubious tag with respect to the offending references. 98.178.191.34 (talk) 08:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious Tag concerning "studies" purported to be used as reference citations 

message: Why do we care what Sowell and Loury are saying? Neither is a sociologist or criminologist or anything else that would make them an expert in this issue. Valereee (talk) 14:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economists?
Talk:Iceland gull

message: I've added one (and removed the request tag here).  While I'm fairly sure it is an Iceland, it would not be the first time I have mis-identified a young Glaucous Gull.  Knowing this isn't an adult (of either species), it strikes me it would also be nice to have images of each "year" for this and other Larids.  mdf 22:29, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: One of my friend's last name is kumlien, LULz... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Robsharpe2001 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Talk About the Passion

message: Just a couple of things. (1) Is this the first song with a foreign phrase, or the only one?  I'm racking my brains to think of another.  (2)A book I have talks about this being re-released as a single in 1988 to support Eponymous, but I have no other details.  It fits in with the video being made, but can anyone confirm this? --OlderBrother 01:16, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Superman contained a Godzilla doll speaking in Japanese at the beginning of the song. A little cheap, but saying "only" would be inaccurate.... Bsd987 03:19, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

text: The last song on Reveal also has a line in French: "à tes souhaits/à tes amours chéri." 64.0.112.251 15:22, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Plan of Attack

message: The in in citation 2 of the current version (here) of the page refers to a blog at The Nation (http://www.thenation.com/blogs/capitalgames?pid=73408).  Click on this link takes you to an article titled "Plamegate Finale: We Were Right; They Were Wrong."  This seems to be an inaccurate link, as the article mentions neither Woodward nor his book.  I don't know how to find the original entry at the Nation, can anyone else take a look? Oaktreezulu (talk) 07:07, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 2013 - Failed link (?)
Talk:Ned Lamont

message: In the first sentence. It seems derogatory, but I'm not sure what it should say instead.
Salelder (talk) 02:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: He's run in three elections (including the current gubernatorial election) over the last 12 years. Considering the numerous elections that have taken place over that timespan (both federal and state), three hardly seems "perennial" to me. Woko Sapien (talk) 18:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "perennial candidate" editorializing? 

message: Change Lamont's status as Democratic nominee to Democratic governor-elect, his opponent conceded to him. Shazzio (talk) 15:02, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. DannyS712 (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2018 

message: Change the information under the heading '2018 Connecticut gubernatorial election' to reflect the results of the election (Lamont defeated Stefanowski) Shazzio (talk) 15:04, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. DannyS712 (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 November 2018 

message: I think we should settle the issue of whether to have "Ned" included in the lede section. I know it's been omitted before because of the Manual of Style, but I feel like that really only applies to cases where the nickname is obvious (i.e. Tommy = Thomas, Nick = Nicholas, Kathy = Katherine, etc.).
Other Neds have had the clarifications in their lede section: Edward Almond, Ned Martin, Ned Davis (politician), to name a few. So I'm not sure why this article should be any different. Woko Sapien (talk) 04:03, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , ."Ned" is a common hypocorism. MOS:NICKNAME is the specific guidance for this issue. It says not to include hypocorisma. Those pages you listed are wrong. Thank you for pointing them out because we can correct them. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:11, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's fair enough. Still, random editors have occasionally tried to add his nickname to the opening sentence in the past (I'm certain in good faith). I've added a separate sentence to the lede with a source that should hopefully settle the issue for good. Woko Sapien (talk) 18:35, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: Under the section "early political career", the claim "During his term as chair, the state saw its unfunded liabilities reduced and pension fund performance improved" the reference (27) does not mention anything to backup this statement.  Request edit to remove that statement without factual reference. Jonshef (talk) 03:01, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and removed the unfounded claim (seemed like original research). I've also added an additional source to confirm the existing information there. --Woko Sapien (talk) 17:41, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference provided does not mention claim in Early Political Career.
Talk:Vaughan Jones

message: It appears that Jones died yesterday, but the news awaits a reliable reference. Charles Matthews (talk) 05:48, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Urano Bacelar

message: Should he be in Category:suicide when it's not oficially confirmed yet? Right now, it's just an apparent suicide; the investigation is ongoing. 207.6.31.119 01:22, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: His wife in Rio de Janeiro says there's no way he committed suicide.  And I don't think there's such a thing as a Category for "alleged suicide", and if there was one, it would be awfully premature to include this article so early on the investigative process.  Regards, Redux 03:34, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Could be.  But we can't really see anything decisive.  As far as I could tell from the pic, it could even be just a man laying down.  Regards, Redux 11:43, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Scouting in Montana

message: Would Wikipedians entertain the idea of having the Councils-by-state sections recategorized to "Scouting in Arizona", "Scouting in Washington", and so on, rather than a list of every council and district? The reason I would like this considered is 
1) no other country's Scouting articles are divided into such minute details (except for The Scout Association of Hong Kong, and really, is that much minutiae important or interesting to the reader?)
2) many councils that a reader may choose to look up, like the Fitchburg Area Council of Massachusetts or the Vigilante Area Council of Montana, went extinct 30+ years ago, yet may be of interest in a more state-based article
3) many states like Alaska share a communal Scout history, only fairly recently being broken into smaller councils, others like North Dakota had several merged into one, and some Scouting histories are better told encompassing an entire state. The fact that Scouts in California prior to the charter of the BSA were the youth arm of the California Highway Patrol, or the fact that Connecticut, while having only eight counties, has had 22 councils over the course of its history, would be well-included in a statewide article. Kintetsubuffalo 01:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Scouting in Montana

message: The early days are heavily slanted to Butte. Troops were started earlier than that, and evidence is available in the Montana Newspaper Archive snachodog (talk) 16:41, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical info
Talk:Scouting in North Dakota

message: Would Wikipedians entertain the idea of having the Councils-by-state sections recategorized to "Scouting in Arizona", "Scouting in Washington", and so on, rather than a list of every council and district? The reason I would like this considered is 
1) no other country's Scouting articles are divided into such minute details (except for The Scout Association of Hong Kong, and really, is that much minutiae important or interesting to the reader?)
2) many councils that a reader may choose to look up, like the Fitchburg Area Council of Massachusetts or the Vigilante Area Council of Montana, went extinct 30+ years ago, yet may be of interest in a more state-based article
3) many states like Alaska share a communal Scout history, only fairly recently being broken into smaller councils, others like North Dakota had several merged into one, and some Scouting histories are better told encompassing an entire state. The fact that Scouts in California prior to the charter of the BSA were the youth arm of the California Highway Patrol, or the fact that Connecticut, while having only eight counties, has had 22 councils over the course of its history, would be well-included in a statewide article
Chris 01:33, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Councils-by-state

message: http://www.flickr.com/photos/strandarchives/5443455209/
--evrik (talk) 03:54, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: *SupportRlevse 16:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The conventions (current and proposed) both state to build from the top down.  This is how we get into protracted AfDs based on notability.  --Gadget850 ( Ed) 22:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In Scouting by <state> articles, the main section is in the state where the council headquarters are located and there is a short section with a backlink in each state where the council crosses borders. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 08:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge of [[Pa-Hin Lodge]]