lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lac qui Parle State Park

message: Does this State Park have area within Lac Qui Parle County as well as Chippewa County?  In the List of Registered Historic Places in Minnesota, the two historic sites here are listed in the different counties.--Appraiser 13:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lac Qui Parle lake divides the two counties. The park includes land on the southern portion of the lake above the dam on both the east and west banks, although very thin tracts on the east side in some places. The majority of the park on the east side is the campground.  The historical site is also on the east side.  I'm not aware of historic sites on the west side, besides where I caught that big walleye that one time.  So I guess the historical site is Chippewa county.
http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/maps/state_parks/spk00197.pdf
http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/state_parks/lac_qui_parle/index.html Andercee 21:59, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lac qui Parle State Park and the Lac qui Parle Mission Archeological Historic District only partially overlap.  The reconstructed mission is not actually in the state park, and I'll have to consult a detailed print source to be sure whether the site of Fort Renville is just inside park boundaries or not.  The state park definitely contains land in both counties.  The historic district is also officially listed in both counties, as confirmed by the nomination form.  (I have a redacted copy I can DM you.)  Although the trading post and the mission are in Chippewa County, this historic district also encompasses the broader area where Native Americans and Euro-American settlers began congregating around these two early outposts.  National Park Service keeps details of the archaeological sites under wraps so as not to abet looters, but it's safe to assume there are unmarked archaeological resources on the Lac qui Parle County side as well.  Archaeological historic districts can consist of noncontiguous sites scattered over a large area. -McGhiever (talk) 17:08, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:Mount Pleasant, Texas

message: This article could use a HUGE clean-up. I nominate me. 64.221.15.66 (talk) 16:21, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: Is having the first Walmart in the state of Texas something to be PROUD of or EMBARRASSED of?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.220.77 (talk) 13:31, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other discusion
Talk:Irv Cross

message: Some info on him here: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/magazine/features/si50/states/idaho/flashback/ --BillFlis 19:19, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Expressnet

message: It might be a good idea to add information as to the maximum amount that can be withdrawn from an Expressnet ATM. Sadly this information is not listed on BPI's own websites. --Edward Sandstig 19:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add them in.  For Banco de Oro, this is P25,000, while for Landbank, it is P30,000.  BPI has P20,000 and HSBC has P40,000.  While Banco de Oro and Landbank post this information, for BPI, you get your limit with the letter containing your ATM card, and HSBC doesn't post info.  I had to call their call center just to get it.  --Sky Harbor 06:20, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Withdrawal limits
Talk:Cova Lima Municipality

message: Hello! Can someone explain to me, how is it possible, that Mape-Zumalai is a subdistrict of Kovalima (just like here and on this official document), but all maps, I found, are showing the cities of Mape and Zumalai in the district of Ainaro (district)? --J. Patrick Fischer 19:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, the borders were modified in 2003 like written in the paper mentioned before. Here is a map, showing the new borders. I just loaded up a new overview map of districts and will load up more maps at Commons until tomorrow night (MET). Please check Commons for correct maps to change the maps at the other articles. I have a lot to do only with the German Wikipedia. Greetings, --J. Patrick Fischer 13:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mape-Zumalai
Talk:Gilmer, Texas

message: Town is three times in the article, including infobox and the first four words of article: Gilmer is a town
City in mentioned seven times and an external link is titled "City of Gilmer official website", which itself starts with Welcome to the official webpage for the City of Gilmer,Texas
I'd like to see a source for calling this a town, or otherwise change the parts with "town" to "city". 88.114.246.209 (talk) 03:02, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  town or city? 

message: I changed the status to city. The original page called it a city. Someone changed it to town in 2009 but left no cites. Both the 2000 and 2010 census call it a city. Someone added a cite after the first sentence in 2011. That cite also called Gilmer a city.Jdtrue63 (talk) 06:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  town or city?? 
Template talk:Lincolnshire

message: Hello, I am the maker of this template. I have no idea how suitable it is for some of the pages on which it is, so I have just put it on all of the pertaining pages, and I shall let others decide. Thanks. Lofty 19:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've converted this navigational template to a footer in line with other similar nav boxes that have been created and merged in the info from :Template:Major settlements in Lincs which was basically repetition. MRSC 20:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template Origins

message: Should this infobox relate to Lincolshire irredentia, from Humber to Wash, or only to the administrative county? Use of the flag would suggest the former ... in which case I'll add Districts: North East Lincolnshire | North Lincolnshire, Other settlements: Grimsby | Scunthorpe etc., Parliamentary Constituencies: Great Grimsby etc. Yes? TheVenerableBede 11:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have to agree. The rest of country demarc their navigation templates according to the Ceremonial counties of England. -- Jza84 · (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ceremonial/entire county or admin county only? 

message: Really we need to convert this template to Template:County, as used by Template:Merseyside, Template:Lancashire, Template:South Yorkshire, Template:Warwickshire, Template:Greater Manchester, Template:Cumbria, Template:Cambridgeshire etc etc. It wouldn't be a big change, more cosmetic than anything else to bring this inline with the rest of England. -- Jza84 · (talk) 15:32, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just actioned it. -- Jza84 · (talk) 15:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Template:County]]

message: I have applied the inclusion criteria for the major settlements section, which have been used on other county templates. This means that all towns and cities are included (whatever their size), and all villages with a population of 10k or more.
Therefore, I have removed Chapel St Leonards, Donington, Ingoldmells, Sutton-on-Sea from the list as none of them are towns, and all with <10k populations. Bazonka (talk) 20:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion criteria
Talk:Census town

message: This looks to me to be unencyclopedic.  It's just a series of definitions used by various countries to determine what qualifies as a city/town for census purposes. Valrith 19:23, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. In fact your definition would suffice. I have rolled back my changes.  Kmcnamee 21:01, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic 

message: I have seen a few articles linking to this.
Few of them are stubs like Panoor Pinarayi etc.
: The above was written in 2006, there are quite a few links to this article, now.
:24.130.18.213 (talk) 07:51, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles Linking to 

message: This redirection is utter nonsense. "Census town" is a type of geographical division based on census. This is a nomenclature used only in India. It has a similar meaning like say Metropolitan Area, Urban Agglomeration etc.  The word "census town" has neither the meaning "Census" nor the meaning "town". How the hell can some one redirect this word to any of these. This is like a providing a extremly misleading and senseless information in wikipedia. Its a pity that wikipedia cannot provide accurate information about a particular phrase. I have added the defintion for "census town" earlier. Instead of making it encylopedic just redirecting it to some wrong information is simply foolishness.
: Agree with last editor. The term has a distinctive meaning, and the redirect was nonsense. --TheEditrix2 16:55, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why redirecting? 

message: This is of no great moment -- I'm not anything like an expert in this subject. Perhaps that's why I can't figure out what's going on from the article or the editing history here.
1) I was reading an interesting article, saw the link to "census town", and immediately had more questions than I'd come with. E.g.,
a) Are there other "kinds" of towns in India besides "census towns"? 
b) What does it mean to be a census town? Government aid? Political representation? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
c) If one does not live in a census town (or "better"), does that mean one is not counted in the census?
2) Why was the information on Ireland deleted? Was it totally spurious? ("- The Central Statistics Office defines a - census town as  - :a cluster of fifty or more occupied dwellings, not having a legally defined boundary, in which within a distance of 800 metres there is a nucleus of either thirty occupied houses on both sides of the road or twenty occupied houses on one side of the road.")
24.130.18.213 (talk) 07:49, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little help?
Talk:Uvalde, Texas

message: It's 19 children and 2 adults according to all sources including the one already linked.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:CC00:EFD0:11D:435A:2A80:BD32 (talk) 22:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: He killed 19 children and 2 teachers, with 17 injured https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/texas-school-shooting-victims-uvalde-robb-elementary/ Sevyog (talk) 15:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of victims 

message: Change "19 children and three adults were killed" to "19 children and three adults were killed and 17 more people were injured"
https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/texas-school-shooting-victims-uvalde-robb-elementary/ Sevyog (talk) 15:23, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: —Sirdog (talk) 01:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2022 

message: I bring this issue up on the Talk Page as an issue that I feel should be called out. I know Wikipedia would not be a good place for discussing about this election result directly, but I'm still baffled that Uvalde, after suffering that school shooting, would vote for Greg Abbott the blatant guns advocate over Beto O'Rourke the man who has proven even before the massacre that he cares about the little guy. I can't say more because what I'm saying is subjective enough, but my intent is to bring this to attention for more people to see, because people do need to see this issue and preferably see it for what it is. 2601:648:8801:1200:BD7E:173:449C:6A98 (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uvalde overwhelmingly voting for Abbott after massacre 

message: out of the 19 kids and 2 teachers where were they when killed? Tylero224 (talk) 23:24, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  where were the kids when they were killed?
Talk:Guo Kan

message: Since a large part of the article is devoted to an autobiography which is false, it should be eliminated.  Discussion anyone?old windy bear 19:24, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:18, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Wharton, Texas

message: Wharton is nowhere near the Colorado River.  Watch for subtle vandalism. --Gpohara 05:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colorado River edit 

message: I am not the one to list it, but I think there should be an area discussing the Tee Pee Motel in Wharton, Texas  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.16.159.194 (talk) 17:17, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  TEE PEE MOTEL
Talk:Vernon, Texas

message: Just out of curiosity, what source was used to gain the demographic data for Vernon, Texas?
I ask, because although Census2000 is cited as the source, the actual Federal Census gives data which radically differs from what Wikipedia is declaring, as does City-Data.com.
69.57.124.109 (talk) 18:19, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In addition to the F4 on April 10, 1979, Vernon was also hit by a possible F5 tornado on May 1, 1954. The last significant tornado to hit Vernon was an F2 on June 7, 1992.--Kevjgav (talk) 15:16, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tornadoes 
Talk:Floresville, Texas

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 20:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Kermit, Texas

message: It says in the article that Hispanics/Latinos make up 100.5% of the population which can't be right. I will try to find the correct figure and put it in the article.Bfjksig201 22:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics 

message: the section on the nursing controversy is well-written and documented, but I wonder why it is not placed in the Winkler County article. The nurses were investigated by the county sheriff, prosecuted by the county attorney, and wound up successfully suing the county.  This would seem to belong to the county article.  Plazak (talk) 15:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No one gave a reason for the section not being in the county article, so I moved it.  Plazak (talk) 00:02, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  nursing controversy 
Talk:Frank Stallone

message: his name was mentioned many times on the weekend up date
Galaxiehoon (talk) 00:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Norm MacDonald]] 

message: Why does it say he wrote 'Eye of the tiger' ? This was written by Frankie Sullivan and Jim Peterik, not Frank Stallone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.24.62.235 (talk) 13:47, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrote Eye of the Tiger? 

message: On Sylvester Stallone's Wiki page it says that Frank Sr. was from Apulia Italy, while on Frank Jr.'s page it says he was from Sicily.--108.23.216.223 (talk) 06:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is also talked about in the page's discussion. Supposedly Sicily is from imdb and it's considered unreliable --69.203.141.234 (talk) 03:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frank Sr.'s Italian origins 

message: What year should be given for this film?  I see sources that say 1989 and 1991, and nothing I'd consider definitive.  IMDB says the release date was March 6, 1991, but the entry is as "Terror in Beverly Hills (1989)". power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terror in Beverly Hills 

message: The tag 'references needed' has been here for at least two years and no references have been added. As a result, Wikipedia is giving free advertising to this subject. If people wish to restore deleted content, please provide references for all material.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:37, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced promotional material
Talk:Nabokov House

message: Needs to be merged with Nabokov Museum. If either of the original authors wants to do the honors, I'll gladly stand aside. Williamborg (Bill) 19:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done. Thanks - Williamborg (Bill) 06:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:Kesteven

message: Would it not be useful to add the correct pronunciation of Kesteven to the article? I don't know what it is: it could be  or . — Gareth Hughes 19:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Whilst the article is not structured with in-line references, I don't think the 'unreferenced' tag is fair: each heading is an act of parliament.  The text itself is it's own reference!
A high proportion of the words in the lists are wikiwords.  It is difficult to challenge the authenticity of any of the statements in the article.--Brunnian (talk) 10:12, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced tags 

message: This article states that Bourne had its own UDC till 1920 - the article on Bourne says that it lasted until the LGA 1972 took effect in 1974. Can this discrepancy be accurately resolved?Ntmr (talk) 16:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bourne
Talk:Birney

message: The Gomaco information reads like advertising. Also, the replica car in question is differs significantly from the design of a true double truck birney. Perhaps it should be referenced as being "in the style" of a double-truck Birney as opposed to replica, which according to Merriam Webster is an exact reproduction or a copy exact in all details.
Haretip (talk) 22:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Lubango

message: I do not understand the following sentence:
Basters, or children of African and Cape Colony Dutch descent, still reside in Lubango, although many were forced to move to occupied Namibia while it was under German occupation between 1928-1930. 
Namibia was a German colony from 1884 until 1915, when it was occupied by South African forces (and not from 1928 until 1930 as stated).
Furthermore I do not understand why the Basters were moved to Namibia. Was Lubango occupied by German forces during the First World War?
July 29, 2006 RaF
* To quote the wikipedia entry for Basters,
"While they remain predominantly based around Rehoboth, some Basters continued to trek northward, settling in the southern Angolan city of Lubango, where they are known as the Ouivamo (many of these were forced to return to Namibia between 1928 and 1930 by white South Africans, who couldn't understand why their illiterate and deeply religious cousins wanted to live amongst the `savages’)."--Thomas.macmillan 00:29, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Extraneous dialogue

message: It looks to me as Cwa דולב חולב (talk) 01:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No month has mean temperatures above 22C, which is the criteria differentiating Cwa and Cwb. Uness232 (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate
Talk:Peter Witt streetcar

message: There is no mention of years - development, entry into service, retirement, etc. Wongm (talk) 13:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a ref to the patent, dated 1916. Production started shortly thereafter. n2xjk (talk) 18:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, manufacture started in 1915.  I added more production info and rearranged the beginning of the article a bit. n2xjk (talk) 20:24, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years operational 

message: Currently 5 of the 6 photos are of Milan cars, albeit some are in San Francisco. Perhaps 2-3 of these can be replaced with pictures of examples from other cities? n2xjk (talk) 20:24, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo request
Talk:Alliott Verdon Roe

message: I had added London based on this Encyclopedia Britannica source . But J. L. Pritchard, rev. Sylvia Adams at Oxford DNB has this: "He died at St Mary's Hospital, Portsmouth, on 4 January 1958." It looks like his Times obituary was used as a source. Martinevans123 (talk) 08:40, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I would trust the DNB & the times obit over Brittanica. Is there a death notice in The Times?TheLongTone (talk) 09:50, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see that the DNB includes these sources: The Times (6 Jan 1958), 14; The Times (27 Jan 1958), 10. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:53, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither the obit nor the death notice in The Times mention place of death.TheLongTone (talk) 12:39, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks for checking. So the mystery deepens. But I guess that "verifiability trumps truth" for the time being. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:29, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a bit more complex if the DNB says one thing and Brittanica another. But Portsmouth seem slikelier given that is where he lived.TheLongTone (talk) 14:00, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, sounds resonable. Any other corroborating sources? Would FreeBMD help at all? Martinevans123 (talk) 14:09, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

text: Funny, didnt find this yesterday: looks like Portsmouth.TheLongTone (talk) 14:21, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that might be a more definitive source. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of death 
Talk:Great Market Hall

message: :hu:Központi Vásárcsarnok is the hungarian article, which may be useful expanding this.Starquin 19:58, 29 July 2006 (UTC)