lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2K22 Tunguska

message: *Photo of Pantsyr
*Photo of Tunguska
--.:Ajvol:. 00:00, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Pantsir

message: SA-19 is actually the name of the missile, not the Tunguska gun-missile system.
:Is there a reference for this? Balon Greyjoy (talk) 13:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SA-19 designation for the Tunguska incorrect? 

message: I have seen GRAU-designations 2K22 (air defence system), 9K22 (missile system) as well as 2S6 (self propelled artillery) for the Tunguska. Which one is correct or do they refers to different parts or versions? /Esquilo (talk) 18:35, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  GRAU index 

message: What is the official name for the Tunguska 2k22, zprk, 2s6, or some other name 69.139.1.18 (talk) 23:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @69.139.1.18 It seems like the name variations are different official names 69.139.1.18 (talk) 23:56, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name variations
Talk:List of German combat vehicles of World War II

message: Didn't know where to put this so i'll put it here.
The Goliath was a wire controlled tracked vehicle that was a anti-tank weapon.I didn't see it in the German template and to be honest I don't know where to put it,The info is a little scant so it might be better of in a existing article. 
Here is some info : http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node=Goliath (second entry from the top)
and pictures : http://wilk.wpk.p.lodz.pl/~whatfor/sdkfz_302_goliath.htm
--Technosphere83 14:32, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:   SdKfz.302 Goliath 

message: I added the varients used for various Panzer models; for example, Panzer III (37) has been changed to Panzer III A-F.
Blerg1 05:55, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Dear wikipedians, to me this article looks more like a "list', though with some additional information about the vehicles listed. I propose to rename the article as "List of ..."; any objections? Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 14:11, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article or list?
Talk:Shettles method

message: That needs substantiation or removal. What /is/ true is that sperm carrying a Y chromosome will have slightly less mass than one carrying an X chromosome (and so will quite possibly be able to go slightly faster) - but that doesn't make the sperm stronger. It's also debateable as to how much influence such a small difference could have. Lupine nickt 12:02, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Y-chromsome-carrying (male) sperm stronger and faster? 

message: While google brings up 24,000 hits, I am still curious. We need some more sources than just one that contradicts it. --Ķĩřβȳ♥ŤįɱéØ 21:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  only one source and it is contradictory? 

message: I've rewritten the article as well as removing the stub and non-objective tags.  One or the other might still be appropriate and I leave it up to other Wikipedians to make that decision.Eljamin 17:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewritten.
Talk:Prime-factor FFT algorithm

message: As far as i have understood the majority of the serious programs for numerical analysis uses a library named FFTW. I would wikipedia to mention which FFT algorithm is used in FFTW.
:Rader's FFT algorithm in the references. Merosonox  t c g  03:20, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to FFTW
Talk:George Gough Arbuthnot

message: I added link to peerage, which confirms the existence of this person. I also happen to know that a recent contributor to this article is a relative, who specialises in genealogy, and who has no reason that I know of to falsify any information in the article. Therefore feel justified in removing the unverified link. Matt Stan 14:44, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Knighted - not a baronet. Knight Bachelor has no postnominal. He was British but spent most of his business career in India. He retired to England where he died. So I would describe him as British and not Indian. Kittybrewster 02:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Clarke

message: The external link added by DruryLaneLondon doesn't seem relevant for this disambiguation page - it leads to a small site about a project "to determine if the early Clark families in Virginia were of the same family, and/or if they were connected to Explorer William Clark", which I doubt is what most people would be looking for if they searched for "Clarke" on Wikipedia. If no one has any objections I'm going to revert the edit. Firetrap  (talk • contribs)  00:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clark(e) Surname DNA Project 

message: It seems rather silly to have two surname pages. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Signs (Snoop Dogg song)

message: Is it still too stubby? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lajbi (talk • contribs) 
:No it's not any more. Lajbi Holla @ meWho's the boss? 11:02, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Single infobox provided

message: I'm gonna add these genres and if anyone has anything against them please tell me on my talk page!--Seán Travers (talk) 21:28, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is hip hop and dance pop and R&B aswell! 

message: This song honors The Gap Band for the fact that a member of that band (Charlie Wilson) is the uncle of Snoop Dogg in which he is a guest vocalist in this song.
Charlie Wilson is not a real life uncle of Snoop Dogg they are actually friends.
fact: Snoop Dogg calls most people Nephew and out of Respect and how close Snoop and Wilson are His family calls him Uncle.
I`m taking that off and i hope everyone concur  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LarryTheGreat (talk • contribs) 23:01, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charlie wilson 

message: major kudos to whoever wrote the 'themes' part. loving your work:)
82.10.127.156 (talk) 22:34, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  awesome
Talk:French Indochinese piastre

message: *Either this should be merged, or should redirect, to Piastre, I think. 15:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge or redirect proposal 

message: Does anyone know what Vietnam's official currency was before the piastre?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.141.194.155 (talk) 19:49, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it was Vietnamese cash. In addition to those, they also had some small silver and gold bars, but those were not so much used in regulay every-day transactions, as far as I understand. There were also beautiful silver and gold (round) coins, but those were generally used as some kind of medals, rather than coins in the ordinary sense. Alfons Åberg (talk) 20:50, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vietnam's official currency before the piastre? 

message: I made some changes to the third column in the table at the bottom of the page. The third column describes the role of the piastre during its final phase, i.e. during the years of the puppet governments of Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, prior to independence. The column used to have a "North Vietnam" and a "South Vietnam" section. However, Vietnam was divided into North and South only in 1954. For instance, the Northern cities of Hanoi an Haiphong were controlled by the French during 1946-54. Speaking of a separate "Northern" part of the country makes sense only in the case of the Viet Minh movement, which did issue its own currency. That currency, however, is a successor currency and thus belongs in the appropriate column: column 4 covers successor currencies. Alfons Åberg (talk) 17:23, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to the table 

message: * 100 Centimes = 1 Piastre = 1 Franc
* 1 Xu = 1 Centime
* 10 Haos = 1 Piastre
* 1 Dong = 1 Piastre Böri (talk) 13:08, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currency 

message: Hi user:TheCurrencyGuy I revised your currency styles here from 1$ to $1 given documentary evidence that French commerce may have legitimately yielded to 19th c British banking convention $1. Your illustration also says $1.
On one hand, 1$ = one dollar appeals to my logic just like 1m = 1 metre. However French Indochina had to pay bills and transfer funds via banks in British HK and India. Hence the preponderance of 19th-20th c English-language memos, cheques etc written $100 - they must have used 100$ inside the colony but 100$ was a clerical missend risk via British money transfer. And yes, that $1 banknote too.
You can revise this if you find evidence HSBC etc yielded to French 100$ convention in English correspondence, but historical documents for $100 are ubiquitous for reasons explained above. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oppa gangnam psy (talk • contribs) 16:53, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there's literally documentary evidence from the banknotes themselves and as far as I can tell they changed position sometime during the 1930's, at least by just looking at these 2 (two) banknotes above. --Donald Trung (talk)  22:23, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 - 1$ changed to $1
Talk:Borough tube station

message: Image added after request from Londoneye, sorry I took it away, I did it unintentionally!. Also thanks to whoever cleaned the infobox up, please e-mail me to tell me what I did wrong, most information in table was added with research from Clive's Underground Line Guides. Medscin 15:10, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have deleted UK=yes as it is mainly to do with National Rail and this station is already covered by Wikipedia:WikiProject Rapid transit and Wikipedia:WikiProject Underground. Simply south 00:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: UK railways
Talk:Roger Toussaint

message: His name is Roger Toussaint, not Toussant as the media has been mispronouncing it. I see that the wikipedia article now has the incorrect spelling as well (I'll correct it).  I'm from Trinidad and Tobago, and several of my friends had the surname Toussaint. It's a French name, brought over from the colonial days, given by French planters to the slaves that they owned. It's pronounced two-seh or two-say, not two-sant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjairam (talk • contribs) 
:Thanks for making this correction. --Aude 00:25, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I also saw "Tuesaint". --I Am Ri¢h! 02:41, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  His name 

message: The last part of the section "Workers Activisim" - "After being re-elected in 2006, he came under heavy criticism from his membership as he began removing union officers who were elected on opposition slates and began working more closely with New York City Transit management.
In mid-2009, amid heavy criticism, Toussaint decided not run for re-election. Instead, Toussaint hand–picked a presidential candidate, Curtis Tate, to run. Former Toussaint ally John Samuelsen handily defeated Tate and became president of TWU Local 100 effective January 2010."
Seems to have been written by a politically opponent - it reads like campaign rhetoric. I think the fact that these two paragraphs appear without citation is telling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.54.76.174 (talk) 19:36, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Although many New Yorkers (inluding low income workers, which very often are disenfranchised minorities) suffer from his actions, the solidarity of workers has been an important tool for the improvement of work conditions in NYC. It is still a matter of debate whether the 2005 strike makes a lot of sense since the average subway worker already earns as much as a junior professor at an average State University.However, a subway worker works physically harder than a college professor.  This makes one of Toussaints demands more understandable: lowering the retirement age for MTA workers. Toussaint himself reportedly earns about $ 250,000 a year.
This needs major revisions to make more NPOV, before reinserting into the article.  --Aude 15:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

text: "Generally, Toussaint is regarded as a greedy, selfish, and immature man who would put his own ego and political reputation before the health, safety, and general welfare of millions of innocent citizens."  um yeah, slight POV there.  this article reads like an NYPost editorial.  not that there's anything wrong with that, but definitely needs to be cleaned up.RonMexico 16:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: The article looks fairly neutral now, and I see from the talk page that lots of POV stuff was removed.  Is the dispute still on?  70.231.185.132 03:09, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that the POV template can be removed.  Anyone care to second me and remove the flag?  --Quasipalm 19:12, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Aude 19:14, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV?
Talk:Bríatharogam

message: Which part of "as edited (in normalized Old Irish) and translated by McManus (1988)" is unclear? The table has nothing to do with Unicode Standard, but is a quote of the Old Irish as seen in the reference. dab (ᛏ) 15:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: McManus specifies that letter names should by convention be written with capital letters. This is how he gives them on page 3 of his 1991 book, and throughout chapter 3 of his 1991 book. Why should this be problematic? Evertype 15:39, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: my bad, I apologize. dab (ᛏ) 16:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And I'm sorry I offended you with the use of the word Vandal. I've tried to make up for it by making stumps for all of the Ogham letter articles. I would like Uath and Ceirt to start out with the same sentence structure, but I've got some other things to do just for the moment. Evertype 16:13, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: that's very nice, I was irked by the redlinks too :) dab (ᛏ) 16:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

message: User_talk:Celticartist says that the content of this website is pretty unique and that wikipedia should link to it rather than absorb the information because it is copyrighted.  I'm not completely convinced of the copyright - I think I see most of the info elsewhere.  Any opinions?—Mrand T-C 14:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick search didn't indicate the info is a full copy-paste from elsewhere, but I don't trust this page at all. It seems to be a lure. The recommened page, the site map, and the contact page are the only ones that don't link to a row of ads for other sites, and once on the site map, clicking on pages supposedly contained in the site link to a page with naught but ads for other "Celtic" sites. This would be enough for me to doubt the whole site, but I distrust the suggested page in particular immediately since it claims the alphabet is also known as "Also known as the Beth, Luis, Nion Alphabet". This is not a historical term; when you hear it it's justified by Robert Graves' erroneous claim that those are the first three letters of the alphabet;  a Google search shows the term mainly propagates on Neopagan sites echoing Graves. So if anything, the site would only be good if we wanted to add an example or section on Neopagan revamping. It has no historical value -- no sources either -- so I suspect the page creator plagiarized or compiled it from a book/books divination, albeit not very well since his spelling and punctuation are atrocious. Penguinwithin (talk) 01:42, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More symbol/alphabet meanings 

message: What ogham font is used here? I have several installed but still see square boxes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Akari no ryu (talk • contribs) 21:27, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Font
Talk:The Private Memoirs and Confessions of a Justified Sinner

message: Unless someone can justify the inclusion of the uneccesary, unsourced and unsupported apologia for Calvinism against the author's supposed misinterpretation thereof, I'll just go ahead and wipe it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.212.133.209 (talk) 15:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

message: Just wondering if Chuck Palahniuk ever acknowledged the influence of this book. I will do some digging Tigerboy1966 (talk) 22:28, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fight Club 

message: While the Confessions is notoriously difficult to categorise, let alone summarise, there are several parts of its current entry that do not appear to sit well and/or could do with revision. For example that 'The narrative is set against the antinomian societal structure flourishing in the borders of Scotland in Hogg's day.' seems to me simply not true, as there's no antinomian societal structure flourishing in the borders in Hogg's day. Thomas Boston, the former minister of Ettrick had some involvement in the Marrow Controversy however that was several years before 'Hogg's day' and not part of any 'societal structure'.
The description of Gil-Martin as a 'demonic' character seems a little misleading and, whether or not it 'may be a reference to the Gaelic word for a fox (itself contentious), that arguably doesn't belong in the introduction.
Similarly, 'told, for the most part, from the point of view of its criminal anti-hero' seems misleading, firstly, because the Editor's Narrative is almost as long as the Confessions itself (about 40:60) and, secondly, because Robert is a bit more complicated than that - (he is never convicted of any crime). While I might try to chisel away at some of this myself over time, the thoughts of others maybe following this page on how the work can be better presented would be most welcome. Cellarius77 (talk) 14:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  General need for revision
Talk:James T. Smith Jr.

message: This article looks like it might have been cut-and-pasted from a campaign site.  Whether or not it actually was, it is definitely in biased in favor of Smith.  --tomf688{talk} 15:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Definately a cut and paste...  http://www.co.ba.md.us/Agencies/executive/bio.html matches up perfectly.  Furthermore the IP address that made the edit that started this trend (208.39.173.53), is registered to, wait for it... Baltimore County Government. --68.50.207.106 01:25, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the materials copied and pasted. --tomf688 (talk - email) 17:55, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Someone appears to be vandalizing this page by putting up false quotes and odd lines such as "Jim Smith will be remembered for his great personality."  I removed these lines and will keep an eye on it.  Stax421 (talk) 17:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism
Talk:The New Age

message: The para here:
:The magazine was bought in 1907 as a going concern by a group of backers, among them Shaw and Holbrook Jackson. Orage's predominance on the editorial side took a little time to emerge. The early days were also marked by a kind of schism, in which the future founders of distributism (notably Hilaire Belloc, G. K. Chesterton and Arthur Penty), split away from the Fabian socialists who remained with Orage.
contradicts the section in Holbrook Jackson
:Later they [Orage and Jackson] separately moved to London as journalists. In 1906, shortly after arriving in the capital, Jackson suggested the founding of the Fabian Arts Group. This led to a split from the Fabian Society, and Jackson and Orage subsequently bought The New Age...
and this in Alfred Richard Orage
:In 1906, Orage attempted to form a league for the restoration of a guild system, much as described by William Morris. The failure of this spurred him in 1907, supported by George Bernard Shaw, to buy the weekly New Age magazine, and turn it into his conception of a forum for politics, literature and the arts. Although many contributors were Fabians, he was quick to distance himself from their politics, and a wide range of political viewpoints were represented.
Anyone know which is correct? --Squiddy 15:46, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the Holbrook Jackson page mis-says this, a little. Jackson and Orage ran The New Age, and there were a few outside backers, namely Shaw (a leading Fabian then), and Lewis Wallace who was a connection of Orage from theosophical circles. Jackson may well have had some money - he was the businessman of the two. Anyway, you are correct that the composite impression is less than clear. Charles Matthews 16:29, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

text: I have done something about the Orage article, which glossed over too much (needs further work). Charles Matthews 16:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistency with [[Holbrook Jackson]] and [[Alfred Richard Orage]]
Talk:Global Empires

message: This is a poor article. In its previous version it was completly Spanish POV centered. It still needs corrections (cleanup) and expasion. The Ogre 17:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV, cleanup and expand 

message: Given that Robert (AWCM) has a good point, I've added a merger tag to the page.  I'll watch it for a while, and if noone objects, I'll wipe this page clean and make it redirect to the Global Empires.  If anyone opposes, speak now or forever hold your peace. Ikh (talk) 13:25, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[Global Empires]]
Talk:Benue River

message: I'm guessing that since there's water in the thing, the picture was taken during wet season? Might be worth adding to the caption, but I wanted to make sure before I did. — BrianSmithson 15:51, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: if at all possible i think that someone should add who discovered the river in the first place. and a couple of coordinates to.
thank you
student
:Thing is, that river is quite long, and old too. A lot of different peoples have lived alongside it for millenia; so it's going to be quite difficult to add who discovered it in the first place. Coordinates are a nice idea though. — mark ✎ 15:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  who?
Talk:Ascendancy (album)

message: The live Prodigy guitarist?? Weird... Nbettencourt 11:57, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gizz Butt 

message: Well, Twinkle just cut the end of my edit summary right off. The point I was making was that AMG does not use thrash in the infobox (not that I'd take it seriously, it is not a reliable source), and secondly, in the review itself, all it does is say "a mix of thrash", it never calls it a thrash metal album. Please find a reliable source. ≈ The Haunted Angel 20:11, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMG  

message: Please put "thrash metal" back up under their album Ascendancy. It is clearly both metalcore AND thrash metal. http://www.allmusic.com/album/ascendancy-mw0000342014 75.117.181.142 (talk) 20:10, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album genre change 
Talk:Ember to Inferno

message: Yes, the guitar sounds thrashy, but metalcore is metalcore because lyrics are screamed, not shouted or growled. A-duh. -MetalKommandant (talk) 02:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really?
Talk:Governor of Delaware

message: Wouldn't a chronological listing of governors be better than an alphabetical one?
There is a chronological listing also listed in the article- as well as others. See:
*Governors of Delaware (chronological listing)
*Governors of Delaware (election results)
*Governors of Delaware (timeline)
stilltim 21:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:10GBASE-LR

message: You may have confused "Cleanup" with "stub"... The article is much too short too be cleaned up... all of the information is in the right place and could not be categorized better, and spelling and grammar is still good, or you might be talking of requesting an expansion... --FlareNUKE 09:50, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup?