lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Led Zeppelin European Tour 1970

message: The article "The Nobs" was hastily re-directed by non-admin TenPoundHammer with the edit summary that it had been merged with this article, which was a clear lie as no content was added/merged following the re-direct. I made a very hasty attempt to rescue and merge "the nobs" content with the brief content-crossover that existed in this article. I emphasize 'hasty' and request someone review my quick content paste to se if I left any duplicaation or if I left something out that should have been kept. Anger22  (Talk 2 22) 03:44, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content rescue 

message: I'm not quite sure why the page I created for "The Nobs" would not be a notable freestanding article, and 'Led Zeppelin 1970 European Tour' would be. The incident surrounding the use of Led Zeppelin's temporary name was noteworthy and detailed enough to include many specifics. Despite including legitimate references for my sources, the article I created has basically been modified (removal of important points regarding use of "The Nobs"), extended, and simply given a different title. Someone felt it was significant enough to make all the changes for a redirect - Because if it's not, then it should be deleted altogether. A more reasonable explanation for all of these alterations would be appreciated. Yobbo14 (talk) 01:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you Edelmand under another account? Yobbo is Australian slang. I noticed that the original editor for this article was him and that the information, before The Nobs article was "merged", is almost the same (including the same factual error). MegX (talk) 09:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

text: I only have one account.  I am the original editor for "The Nobs" article...which was then altered/merged by someone else. Yobbo14 (talk) 01:57, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pirate Editing
Talk:Aston Martin DB6

message: Royal Wedding appearance:
http://edition.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2011/royal.wedding/interactive/gallery.wedding.key.moments/
The last picture shows the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge in a DB6.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.67.208.42 (talk) 19:38, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

message: Please note the stated 0-60 time of 8.4 seconds is hard to verify. Aston Martin's own website states the 0-60 time to be 6.1 seconds, yet that sounds too quick for a DB6. Other websites seem to propose a variety of different figures, such as this one, which suggests a time of 8.3 seconds for the first 1965 version of the car, 7.4 seconds for the second 1968 version and 6.3 seconds for the Vantage DB6.
111B111W111 (talk) 15:05, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Aston Martin DB6 0-60
Talk:Tour Over Europe 1980

message: I was at the Westfalenhalle in Dortmund and I'd swear they opened with Wearing and Tearing, to general bemusement. No one had heard the track before (it popped up later on Coda), and is a (brilliantly) messy wall of sound, so its abrupt ending left the audience stunned and silent.
Trouble is, I have no way of substantiating this claim, unless someone else can confirm. If it wasn't W&T, then what DID they open with on 17th June 1980?
Roger-england (talk) 14:50, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There are bootlegs of that show on Youtube that start before the show begins, and they open with "Train". But it's a pretty loose interpretation of "Train". -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 11:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm sure "Wearing and Tearing" was played on the first date
Talk:Bowery Electric

message: This article is painfuly short on context. It would be great to see it expanded with insight as to the environment that generated the duo, and some info about where they wound up thereafter. Dxco (talk) 05:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I added a new section detailing the duo's recent past and what we know of their future plans. Which is not a lot,  unfortunately. As for more context on their mid-90s musical milieu, I'll defer to greater experts than me. If nobody does anything, I might try to cobble something together... eventually. ;) ColdChowMein (talk) 12:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context
Talk:Aston Martin DB2

message: Shouldn't The Birds be mentioned in this article? The main character drives a DB3 convertible throughout the film. --76.115.67.114 (talk) 23:41, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is mentioned in the Aston Martin DB2/4 article.  It was not a significant part of the film, so it may not be appropriate anyway per WP:WPACT.  72Dino (talk) 23:49, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "The Birds"
Talk:Swiss Miss

message: This text is entirely lifted from the company website!
http://www.conagrafoods.com/consumer/brands/brand_info.jsp?page=swiss_miss  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.227.167.162 (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company website! 
Talk:Led Zeppelin covers and tributes

message: It was suggested in the AfD discussion for this article that Tributes to Led Zeppelin be merged into this article. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:51, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggested

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 14:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Danny Ocean (character)

message: So, there's currently 49 words about the original character played by Sinatra, and no-way-I'm-counting-them words about Clooney's reinterpretation of the character. Seems a bit unbalanced. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 12:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance 

message: I’ll  be back 2020 Jamesfdr (talk) 21:28, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  He is alive
Talk:Ton-class minesweeper

message: HMS Fittleton was not broken up but sunk after a collision with the frigate HMS Mermaid, with considerable loss of life. Her CO, Lt Cdr Peter Paget,RNR, was acquitted by a Courts Martial. This not speculation but fact.
davidwragg@fsmail.net 28 December 2011.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.249.123.198 (talk) 19:10, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  FITTLETON'S FATE 

message: Not sure the point in having John I. Thornycroft & Company, Southampton in the side pane when these ships were built by  multiple companies Lǐshìmǎn (talk) 01:00, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shipbuilders 

message: Should the title of this article have the hyphen removed? Murgatroyd49 (talk) 15:31, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it is a compound adjective. "The Ton class" - noun format "The Ton-class minesweeper" - compound adjective per WP:NC-SHIPS Llammakey (talk) 16:52, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I was getting confused! Murgatroyd49 (talk) 18:00, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. Llammakey (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyphenation
Talk:Cradle of Love (Billy Idol song)

message: Is the song about anything?
Does it refer to Jerry Lee Lewis when it talks about a "ball on fire" and a "rebel taking a child bride?"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.208.244.20 (talk) 13:17, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
File talk:Rasols-small.jpg

message: Do try and contact me first before deciding all sorts of wikitemplification is required including putting this poor little image on yet another list to be deleted (or, in fact, as has also been done, just deleted it).
It's my picture, I uploaded it, anyone can do what they will with it as long as they leave it in peace. Obviously the template has not been entered correctly as it's not expanding, hopefully that will get fixed. PētersV (talk) 06:38, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems there should be bigger Wikifish to Wikifry
Template talk:Arkansas in the Civil War

message: Initial draft. Red Harvest (talk) 06:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Template might benefit from addition of the period state flag image. Red Harvest (talk) 06:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: State Flag

message: I recall some other battles that are not on the NPS list.  Some Reconstruction topics would be good as well. Red Harvest (talk) 06:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More Topics Welcome
Talk:Henry Doktorski

message: Does his surname mean that one of his paternal ancestors was a doctor? Badagnani (talk) 21:15, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We believe that to be true. BTW, no middle initial. Henrydoktorski (talk) 19:17, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology of surname

message: I can not find anywhere on ref 9's web site (palace construction) where it mentions you. Can you give me a precise link? Same thing with ref 28. Refs need to support what is said in the body. If they don't, they can go in "External links" as amplifying info.  — Rlevse • Talk •  02:44, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Refs
Talk:Mamie Thurman

message: This article is downright awful!  Inaccurate, vague, and un-cited.  I know my edits are probably going to be deleted since I don't have an account, but even the one book linked at the bottom isn't even followed based on the 'facts' recounted in the article's body.  Major overhaul needed.  The conspiracy section doesn't even touch the conspiracy at all!  Just the confusion over where her grave is!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.118.92.6 (talk) 22:43, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just a sort of random question but should this page include the urban legend about how she "apparently" now haunts 22 mine road. Since multiple people online (I will admit mostly on Youtube) talk about her ghost wandering up the mountain (even though I personally haven't seen her or anything paranormal while I was on that road.) But thank you in advance for reading this. Retr0 (talk) 17:53, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The ghost of Mamie Thurman" and 22 mine road.
Talk:Pi Kappa Lambda

message: I'll try to add one soon, once school is out for the summer Mugregg (talk) 17:58, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm.  It's been twelve years.  Maybe someone else might jump on this? Jax MN (talk) 18:31, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Responding about the photo
Talk:Zakpo

message: Against speedy deletion: This journal features the work of some notable artists (Hubbuch is well known, Spuler is in the Getty Union List of Artist Names online), and would seem to gain additional notability by being the subject of an expensive facsimile reprint 50 years later.  Ewulp (talk) 07:15, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anuradha Sriram

message: Anuradha Sriram is a prominent playback singer who has sung innumerable classics in Indian languages. I've provided adequate references and sources. Placing a deletion tag here is just like placing one on Mozart regarding him of being a "culture-specific" artist. I advice the person who has placed it to remove it to immediate effect. Otherwise, it shall be regarded as a blatant display of Eurocentrism. --Rustam 07:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Deletion
Talk:Euler–Rodrigues parameters

message: From a bit of reading, I think Euler-Rodrigues parameters are not synonymous with Unit Quaternions, as suggested here. --Yoderj (talk) 21:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: As I reorganized and expanded this article, I realized that a page on the Euler-Rodrigues formula was missing. It is referenced in various places (e.g. in the article on SO(4)), but it deserves a page of its own. Therefore I created this page, and filled it with content similar to this one.
As a result, this page (on the parameters functioning in the E-R formula) has become redundant. I suggest that "Euler-Rodrigues parameters" becomes redirected to "Euler-Rodrigues formula".
Arjenvreugd (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:27, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replace by redirect?
Template talk:Pennsylvania House of Representatives info

message: I changed the format for the PA House District pages. Now the links use the cardinal numbers instead of the ordinal numbers. This makes the page titles much simpler. 
The general format for district pages is now "Pennsylvania House of Representatives, District XXX." I moved the existing pages under the old naming system, so nothing is lost. 
This allows the use of a succession box template for state representatives (Template:PAHouseSuccession_box) --RedShiftPA (talk) 07:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructured link formats 

message: User:Frietjes Has constantly removed the house seal from the template, under the claims it makes it too big. But that's not true. Adding the seal simply moves the names over to the left more. There is so much space between the names without the seal, that there is plenty of room to spare. Frietjes, please give a better reason for it to be excluded. Fry1989 eh?  20:17, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: what are you talking about?  did you actually look at this template before posting this complaint? Frietjes (talk) 15:55, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I posted on the wrong talk page, but thanks for assuming bad faith. Fry1989 eh?  20:39, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's probably a good idea to keep the discussion in one place to avoid these problems. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:12, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  House Seal image
Talk:Man of Sorrows (Heemskerck)

message: Hm, looks like the title is still ambiguous.  There is this one :Image:Meister Francke 004.jpg on Wikipedia by Friar Francke, but I know also that this is the title of many other works of the same theme.  Feel free to improve. NTK (talk) 08:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the page. NTK (talk) 08:13, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Swara (custom)

message: As far as I can tell these articles are about the same custom, which simply has different names. Per sources such as this , which state "Vani or Swara
Vani or Swara refers to a customary practice common across Pakistan that serves as a method of resolving disputes and settling debts between families and tribes. According to this custom, female
members from the offending male’s family are married/given to the victim’s family as a reparation or penance. These decisions are often made by a jirga or panchayat, a council of elders from the community who convene an informal court to decide methods for resolving disputes. Girls are often subject to inhumane treatment, rape and torture by their in-laws."
The merge can go either way, if someone can provide evidence that Vani is a more common name I'm fine with that. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 21:30, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Support, perhaps using Vani (custom) as the final name, as it is term used in Urdu, the national language in Pakistan and widely spoken elsewhere. It also seems to be used in English newspapers, for example. Klbrain (talk) 22:33, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Vani (custom)]]
Talk:Charles Linn

message: I merged Statue of Charles Linn here because there was so little material and because the destruction of the statue needs the explanation of Linn's history to make sense. This was undone, so here we are. Mangoe (talk) 15:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Strong oppose. There's enough coverage for a standalone article; the statue page needs to be expanded, not deleted. Then, briefly summarize in both the Charles Linn and Linn Park, Birmingham, Alabama articles. ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:50, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Having come back to review the expanded article on the statue, it's still basically one shortish paragraph. I'm just not seeing a reason not to redo the merge using the expanded material. Mangoe (talk) 14:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

text: Oppose. Second all points made by .  -- John (Johnnie Bob (talk) 22:28, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of statue article
Talk:John G. Crommelin

message: The events of 6/10/2009 belong in this article, IMO, but perhaps in its own section?  Billbrock (talk) 22:28, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A statement of his praising the shooter, James von Brunn can be found in the Archive of von Brunn's website . 68.97.6.204 (talk) 19:30, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's currently being handled better than I'd originally suggested.  The association with von Brunn during Crommelin's lifetime is mentioned, but not events subsequent to Crommelin's death. Billbrock (talk) 21:05, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current events 
Talk:Lewis Smith Lake

message: I added the satellite image to satisfy the request for a map. While not technically a map, I think it meets the intent. I removed the request for map tag as well. BrokeBox (talk) 16:56, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: A little WP:OR here, but if you've ever been on the upper Sipsey, above the impoundment, you realize that they flooded hundreds of miles of pristine river canyon and hardwood lowlands for the sake of coal mining, and now its just a decent fishing lake used mainly for recreation and minimal hydro-electric production.  Ditch ∝ 18:56, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: When did they change the depth?
The Map I have says the deepest part is 316' which  is one of the older maps, But still. 2600:6C40:6B00:220C:134D:D495:A0C2:34B0 (talk) 17:45, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depth
Talk:Chieko Hosokawa

message: I removed "Attention Please has been adapted in to two different TV drama series." from the article. One source says it was adapted to drama series while other source says it was based on 1970 drama series. --Kusunose (talk) 23:21, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a TV drama series made in 1970 (the same year the manga was released). This was done for Japan Airlines. A newer series was made in 2006. Therefore, there were two different series. It's likely the 2006 series was at least influenced by the one from 36 years earlier. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:37, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a 1970 drama series and a manga released on 1970 and they are apparently related. However, from the sources, it is unclear whether the manga was adapted to the 1970 TV series or the 1970 TV series was adapted to the manga. --Kusunose (talk) 00:42, 16 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I noticed that the second source had corrected from aired on TV but the story was different from Hosokawa's work to the TV series was the original. The manga was an adaptation based on it and had a different story on 2007-02-04. And there is an article on :ja:上條逸雄, who is the screenwriter of the 1970 drama series; the article states the manga by Chieko Hosokawa credits the original concept to Itsuo Kamijō and ... the drama was not a TV drama adaptation from the manga. Therefore, the 2006 series credits Itsuo Kamijō for the original concept., though no sources is given. --Kusunose (talk) 01:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fine with it being corrected. It shouldn't be removed, though. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:37, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attention Please 

message: I recently heard news about this mangaka's death? They say that she died in a car crash. Can anybody confirm this?
chika (talk) 10:47, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Person on article died? 
Talk:Arundel Formation

message: Coelosaurus affinis is actually a new combination by Matthew and Brown (1922) for Ornithomimus affinis Gilmore, 1920, a replacement name for Dryosaurus grandis Lull, 1911. Gilmore (1920) placed Dryosaurus grandis in the genus Ornithomimus, which rendered Lull's name secondarily preoccupied by Ornithomimus grandis Marsh, 1890 and necessitated the replacement name Ornithomimus affinis. However, the holotype of Ornithomimus grandis comes from the Eagle Sandstone of Montana and is presumed lost (Osborn 1916), while Smith and Galton (1990) could not identify the Arundel taxon beyond Theropoda indet. To be on the safe side, Dryosaurus grandis has not been considered congeneric with Ornithomimus since 1920 and is older than O. grandis Marsh, 1890, so Lull's name is not preoccupied and Gilmore's name becomes a junior objective synonym of Dryosaurus grandis. 
C. W. Gilmore. 1920. Osteology of the carnivorous Dinosauria in the United States National Museum, with special reference to the genera Antrodemus (Allosaurus) and Ceratosaurus. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 110:1-154
R. S. Lull. 1911. Systematic paleontology of the Lower Cretaceous deposits of Maryland: Vertebrata. Maryland Geological Survey: Lower Cretaceous 183-211 
W. D. Matthew and B. Brown. 1922. The family Deinodontidae, with notice of a new genus from the Cretaceous of Alberta. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 46(6):367-385 
Osborn, 1916. Skeletal adaptations of Ornitholestes, Struthiomimus, Tyrannosaurus. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 35(43), 733-771.
Smith and Galton, 1990. Osteology of Archaeornithomimus asiaticus (Upper Cretaceous, Iren Dabasu Formation, People's Republic of China). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 10(2), 255-265. 68.4.61.168 (talk) 02:31, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dryosaurus grandis
Talk:Bahariya Formation

message: Erectopus sauvagei is a junior objective synonym of E. superbus (Allain 2005), since Sauvage (1882) did not intend E. superbus to be based on the teeth that Huene (1932) incorrectly regarded as being the holotype of E. superbus, nor did Sauvage (1882) designate a holotype for E. superbus. Since Allain did not address the taxonomic affinities of a tibia referred to Erectopus by Stromer (1934), it is best to remove Erectopus from the species list 
Allain, R. 2005. The enigmatic theropod dinosaur Erectopus superbus (Sauvage, 1882) from the Lower Albian of Louppy-le-Château (Meuse, France). in Carpenter, K. 2005. The Carnivorous Dinosaurs, Indiana University Press: 72-86.
Sauvage, H.-É., 1882, "Recherches sur les reptiles trouvés dans le Gault de l'est du bassin de Paris", Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, série 3 2(4): 1-42
Huene, F. von, 1932. Die fossile Reptil-Ordnung Saurischia, ihre Entwicklung und Geschichte. Monographien zur Geologie und Palaeontologie, ser. 1: 1-361.
E. Stromer. 1934. Ergebnisse der Forschungsreisen Prof. E. Stromers in den Wüsten Ägyptens. II. Wirbeltierreste der Baharîje-Stufe (unterstes Cenoman). 13. Dinosauria [Results of the expeditions of Professor E. Stromer in the Egyptian deserts. II. Vertebrate animal remains from the Baharîje bed (lowest Cenomanian). 13. Dinosauria]. Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung, Neue Folge 22:1-79. 68.4.61.168 (talk) 22:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erectopus