lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:George G. Ritchie

message: i thought this was one of the stupist book i had every looked at but i am 14 soooo but my dad made me read it and i did i was surprised to find out what it was about it was very entresting and i hope you give some time up and read this wonderful book  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.195.60.118 (talk) 18:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1947 Philippine Parity Rights plebiscite

message: Being WP:Bold I merged this article with Bell Trade Act. This is not what is preferred.  I would prefer two solid, informative, detailed articles, but we do not have those yet.  We have two short articles that are nearly stubs.  And those two articles go so well together.  The Bell Trade Act required the plebiscite.  Putting them together makes that connection clear, and the consequence to Philippine sovereignty. Putting the two together helps readers see what relationships was between the US and the Philippines.  Separately the two almost-stubs seem blah.  Merging the two also reduces the need to duplicate discussion of the specifics of the Bell Trade Act and parity and of the arguments pro and con.  Hopefully sooner rather than later we will have enough material to split the article back into two.--Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 12:08, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged with Bell Trade Act
Talk:Mikkel Bødker

message: Is this the title of the program, or is the program considered excellent? I'm sure it does not mean for youth with big muscles. :-) I've put a fact tpl on that. Alaney2k (talk) 15:49, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that an 'elite youth' program? Alaney2k (talk) 16:07, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the wording to highly regarded as the programme should be considered the best in the country, where probably only the youth programme of Herning Blue Fox even comes close. One way to demonstrate this is by looking at the number of NHL drafted players. Of the 8 Danish players drafted since 2002, 4 have been a product of the Rødovre team, including the only 2 players drafted in the first round (Bødker and Eller). AEJ (talk) 00:53, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know it's true, but to be neutral it would be better to skip any description of the quality of their youth program. If you find a good and reliable source (can't be too hard) add it to Rødovre article. And btw, Mieritz and Svendsen will make it six for Rødovre ;) —Krm500 (Communicate!) 03:05, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is 'strong youth'
Talk:Best of Bee Gees, Volume 2

message: I have a 1974 French double LP here (Polydor 2675 088) titled "Best of the Bee Gees", which uses the same cover image as BoBB2 (albeit reversed), and has a different playlist:
*A1 Holiday
*A2 I've Gotta Get A Message To You
*A3 I Can't See Nobody
*A4 Words
*A5 I Started A Joke
*A6 Spicks And Specks
*B1 First Of May
*B2 World
*B3 Massachusetts
*B4 To Love Somebody
*B5 Every Christian Lion Hearted Man Will Show You
*B6 New York Mining Disaster 1941
*C1 Let There Be Love
*C2 I.O.I.O.
*C3 Don't Forget To Remember
*C4 Saved By The Bell
*C5 Lamplight
*C6 One Million Years
*D1 August October
*D2 Sweetheart
*D3 Railroad
*D4 I'll Kiss Your Memory
*D5 Lonely Days
*D6 Tomorrow Tomorrow
Which appears to be a combination of the two "Best Of" records, albeit with some differences in playorder. Drutt (talk) 02:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It combines the 1969 Best of Bee Gees (sides A and B) with a 1971 Best of Bee Gees vol 2 (sides C and D) that was issued in France, Italy and Scandinavia not to be confused with the track line-up that was used for the UK 1973 release with the same title which this Wiki page refers to.Ferdinandhudson (talk) 18:15, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Addorsed

message: Can someone help me? I'm trying to work with WikiProject Missing articles and there are some things that are best served with a wiktionary entry...is there a better way to do this?  This particular word is in several wikipedia articles about different coats of arms and this addition could help.
I'm trying to learn, so I appreciate any help! Legotech (talk) 09:34, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Fripp Island, South Carolina

message: I thought there would at least be a single sentence here or perhaps a cross-reference to potential risks (or lack of) for these barrier islands due to global warming.  
Follow-up...
This just found: "Scientists: Rising sea levels threaten Hilton Head, Fripp and..."
http://www.islandpacket.com/2009/03/29/797155/scientists-rising-sea-levels-threaten.html
And: "Fripp Island. This island is a gated community and hence would not be eligible for federal funding for beach nourishment. It has, however, been nourished with private funds in the past and county planners expect that such nourishment will continue in the future. This island also has hard shore-protection structures. Therefore, the county believes that it is certain to be protected." http://risingsea.net/ERL/SC_Beaufort.html
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.5.88.64 (talk) 05:46, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  At risk due to rising ocean levels?
Talk:Jury stability criterion

message: :If the first element of the first row of every row pair is positive at this point, then the system is stable.
Needs clarification, what is a row pair?
Moreover, I don't think that it is correct. Actually, the system is stable if the absolute value of the first element of each odd-numbered row is greater than the absolute value of the last non-zero element in the same row. The Italian version of this article is good I think. Even the construction of the table is a bit more complicated in the English version. Maybe, it should be clearer to use determinants of 2x2 matrices.
Ciano bill (talk) 22:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  row pair?? 

message: This is completely wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.235.204.106 (talk) 20:46, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completely wrong 

message: Strictly speaking, this article describes the Marden algorithm rather than Jury. They're closely related, though. The difference between Marden and Jury algorithms is explained in Rajan S., "Stability and stabilization of linear time invariant system using marden table" (https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/50219/8/08_chapter3.pdf), pages 44-50 particularly. Marden's test requires building the full table, which is what we read in the article: "... continued in this manner until a row containing only one non-zero element is reached," while Jury's allows to stop at the pair of rows that contain 3 elements. And checking the sign of the leading coefficient is Marden's criterion, while Jury's criterion is based on the comparison of the magnitudes of the first and the last coefficients in a row.
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.109.50.205 (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is Marden's test, not Jury's test
Talk:Bring Me Your Love (album)

message: Why can't I put this up? I really think it should be on the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gabriel Surette (talk • contribs) 20:32, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Copyright issues. "[I]f you know that an external Web site is carrying a work in violation of the creator's copyright, do not link to that copy of the work." Based on a review of the link that you provided, it appears to be in violation. Therefore, the link cannot be included in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 22:25, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music video for ''Waiting...'' 

message: Both the album and film are after Bring Me Your Love (Bukowski short story), so if anything is primary, it is the story. There may or may not be other albums (seems not but needs to be checked). In ictu oculi (talk) 06:01, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Not primary topic
Talk:HMCS Micmac

message: Much of the content of this article is about the Tribal Class of destroyers generally, not HMCS Micmac, and shoudl be transferred to the Tribal Class Destroyer article. In addition, there are quite a few opinion statements in this article about the perceived failings of the Tribal Class generally and Halifax Shipyards specifically. Finally many of the statements in this article lack citations or when they do appear, do not match the content of the statements.
I have tried to remedy this by removing some of the uncited opinions, adding more citations and adding some more balanced facts while keeping the factual content intact. Maybe someone else can consider integrating the discussion about Tribal Class destroyers to that article instead of going into such great lengths in this one.Letterofmarque (talk) 01:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems
Talk:Captain Morgan's Revenge

message: "Pirate Metal" is not a canonical subgenre. Please stop adding it to the infobox. 77.97.21.19 (talk) 17:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cry me a river! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pirate_metal 🤣 2003:CC:E71D:E400:51C3:1869:FFEC:8B8E (talk) 15:30, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre
Talk:Dewey Lambdin

message: I have written the main article for Dewey Lambdin. I have read the whole Patrick O'Brian Aubrey-Maturin series of historical naval novels set during the Napoleonic Wars and am also interested in this author as he covers the same period in the same fictional vein. Ivankinsman (talk) 17:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first paragraph of the "Alan Lewrie Series" section is copied from http://www.armchairsailorseattle.com/dewlamalser.html
The synopsis of The King's Coat comes from another page of that site: 
http://www.armchairsailorseattle.com/kingscoat.html. Or perhaps from the publisher's site, here: 
http://www.randomhouse.com/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780449003602.
The biographical material on Lambdin (which has a press-kit feel) is lifted from http://www.uss-bennington.org/DeweyLambdin.htm (the page is cited as a source--but the language is copied exactly). RLetson (talk) 19:16, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, article cleaned now. Please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems if you spot copyright problems in other articles. Yoenit (talk) 09:44, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Yoenit (talk) 09:41, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Confraternity of Catholic Saints

message: I think there is no need to delete this entry because it will help many young filipinos be inspired to be Saints. This is a unique association in the Philippines which is now a "pro facto" recognized by the Diocese of Cubao and recommended by many Bishops from Croatia and Europe.
:Unfortunately, these are not the criteria on which articles in Wikipedia are created or deleted. Wikipedia is not here to inspire holiness or unholiness or anything else. It is just an encyclopedia and it aims to have article about notable topics. Please have a look at that page: "notable" rougly means "covered by multiple, independent, reliable source". If a friend of mine writes a story about me in a local bulletin, this is not an independent, reliable source! The discussion is just to ascertain whether your association is "notable" in this sense, not about its merits. Otherwise, we should have an article about each good and worthy person in the world, and no articles about dictators, criminals, and illnesses!(Please sign your posts!)Happy editing, Goochelaar (talk) 10:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Donald E. McQuinn

message: The article Donald E. McQuinn is a paste job from Fantastic Fiction (see: Fantastic Fiction) a website which is copyrighted as "© 2008 FantasticFiction". As an article in violation of our copyright policies, said article should be "Speedy Deleted".
Thank you. Tony the Marine (talk) 16:56, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This page was created on September 2, 2007 based on the bio included by the publisher in multiple novels.  The biographical information was not added to the Fantastic Fiction entry until after January 18, 2008 (Internet Archive). —MJBurrage(T•C) 03:44, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article in violation of Copyright Laws
Talk:Order of the Four Emperors

message: This page can be merged into Ancient Order of St. George, as it concerns the same order and is already mainly included in the latter.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.83.30.184 (talk) 10:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 11:19, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:St Ebbe's Church, Oxford

message: Is St Ebbe’s under the care of the Bishop of Oxford, or is it under one of the flying bishops like St Thomas the Martyr? – Kaihsu (talk) 10:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It does not appear to be under a flying bishop. – Kaihsu (talk) 10:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's not on this list, so it's under the Bishop of Oxford. -- Fluteflute Talk Contributions 20:14, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Oxford?
Talk:City of New Orleans (album)

message: see first paragraph...enough said as to why Wikipedia stinks.207.38.156.111 (talk) 08:37, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, but please see . Dabomb87 (talk) 04:02, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the f is a 'rendentions'
Talk:Cliff (album)

message: This article says that this album is "the first white professionally recorded live rock and roll album". I know it's supported by a source from Bruce Eder, but it's not true.
Tommy Steele Stage Show predates it. It was released in 1957 and it is a genuine live album, as far as I can tell. What do we think? Humbledaisy (talk) 20:57, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first white professionally recorded live rock and roll album.
Talk:Conception (album)

message: This album was released well before Rudy Van Gelder was working with Bob Weinstock. I removed all references to Rudy Van Gelder. Actual recording info is here:
http://www.jazzdisco.org/prestige-records/catalog-7000-series/#prlp-7013
Felixstrange (talk) 19:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Recorded By Van Gelder
Talk:Jon Edward Martin

message: I don't believe the bio-photo shown on this page is Jon Edward Martin. In fact, the photo indicates it is Joseph Martin. This needs to be corrected. ScottyTD3 (talk) 23:04, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph Incorrect
Talk:Portable engine/Archive 1

message: This archive was created 'early' in order to remove the 'DYK' discussions from the talk page. These were felt to be 'unhelpful' once the article DYK nomination had been selected DYK.
Please feel free to store further sections on this page, after the initial content.<BR>EdJogg (talk) 10:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Dig (Miles Davis album)

message: Could someone familiar with this subject double-check the chronology? Should be 1951? Fx6893 (talk) 20:44, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In all releases I could listen to, some tracks in this album (specially "Dig") are severely deteriorated by an inappropriate reverberation, unlikely to have been added in 1951 by the Apex engineers.
The main article mentions that Rudy Van Gelder remastered this record five years later. Obviously, he would never have made such a mistake, unless he could only work on a damaged master.
Anyone aware of a reverb-free release?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cedesguin (talk • contribs) 22:43, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remastered?
Talk:Digilogue

message: I've reverted the edit that changed the track title "Angel's Pin Number" to "Angel's PIN". Looking at the tracklisting on my copy of the CD, it definitely says "Angel's Pin Number". This is also the title attribution on discogs.com (Digilogue). Alchemagenta (talk) 17:25, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angel's Pin Number
Talk:Nutritional rating systems

message: I tagged a couple of sections that had been previously edited with promotional-type language. 
The following edit deleted some information and replaced it with promotional material:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nutritional_rating_systems&diff=prev&oldid=367703565
And there are others. Sparkie82 (t•c) 03:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think systems which haven't been researched by an independent source should honestly be removed. Everything besides ANDI and Glycemic Index, seems too disingenuous. 12.168.201.132 (talk) 23:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Hype

message: The last section of the article, "claimed rigor," has no references to support the claim, nor any references at all. Recommend the addition of a source for the information or deletion of the section.
A cursory search on search engines reveals a number of Websites with the identical wording of the paragraph.
I do not edit articles; I leave that to those who understand Wikipedia's rules.
76.0.13.242 (talk) 01:13, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claimed Rigor Section Has No Reference, Reads Like Promotion
Talk:Pleasley Colliery

message: Can we get a source for verification of this claim?  /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 23:33, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Scheduled Ancient Monument]] 

message: mice structure, tone and pic.With an ibox and inline refs this could be a "Good Article" Well done Victuallers (talk) 07:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Brilliant article

message: The new image added at the introduction to the article does give a better visual perspective, but the image of the South headstock is not in an appropriate location since it is not relevant to the body of the article and shows the results of 2010-2011 restoration work.  A post 1995 timeline addition is proposed which will include conservation and/or remediation work undertaken during since that time and can elaborate on the preserved structures such as this. (Technical Historian, Pleasley Colliery)
Stefanthatch (talk) 14:10, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image changes & additional section 

message: Hope you don't mind me adding an update but it seemed a pity not to make a reference to all the restoration work that has been done recently
Carllrac (talk) 15:41, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hope you don't mind update 

message: Just wondering if there was any citation for that? Only think I can find is http://www.pleasleypittrust.org.uk/#!services/c187h - which looks like they've just copied it verbatim.
Edent (talk) 11:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of "Sputnik" claims?
Talk:River Meden

message: I have assessed the article against the criteria for B-class.
* Suitably referenced, with inline citations
* Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
* Defined structure, with adequate lead
* Reasonably well written for grammar and flow
* Supporting materials - Infobox, map, images, POI table
* Appropriately understandable
Since it meets these criteria, I am rating it as B-class. Bob1960evens (talk) 15:33, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Egyptology (album)

message: OK, erm, maybe this should be redirected to Egyptology (World Party album)? -- Hindleyite (talk) 20:44, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would you care to justify how you can call this a commercial failure? It's their second highest charting album!--90.215.76.144 (talk) 19:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disappointing sales
Talk:Laura Kasischke

message: Have commenced tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories and/or poems. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Talk:Martha Collins (poet)

message: *WP:ARTIST:4 "The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums." -- notable per inclusion in many anthologies 
*Wikipedia:Notability (academics) 4 "The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research." Pohick2 (talk) 18:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of schools in Southland, New Zealand

message: There seems to be a problem with the Winton School link, it leads to the article about Winton Community Academy in Hampshire, England. Please rectify Tiwaking (talk) 02:37, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. The reason the link took you to a school in Hampshire was that the school there was previously also called Winton School. I've fixed it, although there is no article on this school and may not ever be, as primary schools usually do not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability.-gadfium 04:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winton School 
Talk:Dennis Nurkse

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates for books and articles, as well as tables for organising short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 04:01, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Notocrater

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  ----Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed