lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:KT (energy)

message: I wanted the value for kT, so I'm glad it's in a separate article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hhansma (talk • contribs) 16:21, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't thinking of redirecting this article to RT, but of merging the two to some new title. I don't know what that would be, but it seems silly to have two stub articles discussing the same concept. Adabow (talk) 18:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with both of Adabow and Brian Hill.  The solution is to merge them into a single article call kT (energy). Dondervogel 2 (talk) 11:28, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  A merge makes lots of sense. OTOH, I'm evaluating as a physicist, so I can only imagine how a chemist would feel if RT became subsidiary to kT. Brian Hill (talk) 23:37, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Noting the consensus for a merge, and a weaker consensus for merge to kT (allowing for WP:SILENCE),  Klbrain (talk) 23:47, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[RT (energy)]] 

message: This article has a terrible name, it is apt to cause more confusion to readers than help them. (Think: how will readers get to this article, and what do they expect to find here?)If the concept does not have a specific name, but is only a piece of Boltzmann's equation, it almost certainly should not have an article. Whatever information is here should be moved to other articles, e.g. Boltzmann's equation. --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 14:18, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad article name, article should not exist 

message: I made a small edit to the end of the article.  One kT has units of energy, not energy/mol.  That's RT.
kT at room temperature is ~ 25 meV, so kT/e should be ~ 25 mV, this should be corrected.
Good catch. Looks like somebody already fixed it. Brian Hill (talk) 16:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some small corrections that have been made

message: Ok 59.89.175.169 (talk) 04:58, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  E=kt
Talk:Bernard Lown

message: Original article from Geoffrey Wickham.  Improvements and additions welcomed.--Geoffrey Wickham 05:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So elderly but still knows whats going on around himself?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:411:1600:5D5B:973A:723E:A0AE (talk) 19:06, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  105 years old? 
Talk:Crimewave

message: The line, "The Coen brothers expressed similar dissatisfaction with the film, and have since directed every one of their screenplays with the exception of the 2012 film Gambit," is now inaccurate, and the sources cited are out of date, or at the very least will be on the release of Suburbicon, which the Coens wrote on their own and hired George Clooney to direct.  I'm leaving it to discretion whether to count Bridge of Spies and Unbroken, since those were shared screenwriting credits under different directors.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joethetimelord (talk • contribs) 22:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the Coens no longer being exclusively writer/directors. 
Talk:The Lyceum, Liverpool

message: As above  Lusoanglian (talk) 21:15, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info, the articles been updated. Tsange</font> (Talk) 12:05, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The coop is no longer in this location. So the building is all vacant and degrading
Talk:SMS Grosser Kurfürst (1913)

message: This revision seems to be in British English. Was it changed? --MarchOrDie (talk) 00:54, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, from AmEng in 2005. I changed it back when I wrote the article. Parsecboy (talk) 10:22, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ENGVAR 

message: This (right) is the lead image in the article on the German Wikipedia.  It appears to be a photograph of this battleship. Is that right?  Perhaps we could use it instead of the current lead image here, which appears to be a drawing of a different vessel, SMS König, in the same class? 213.205.198.188 (talk) 20:28, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That photo has no source or valid copyright status, so no. Parsecboy (talk) 21:00, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and it's almost certainly the same photo as this one, which the IWM labels as , not Grosser Kurfürst. I suspect the uploader on de.wiki is confused. Parsecboy (talk) 11:39, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Order of the Holy Cross (disambiguation)

message: If Order of the Holy Cross is going to be a disambiguation redirect, so too should Order of St. Benedict and other pages that currently direct to the article on the Roman Catholic order of that name. Fishhead64 06:14, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Google organized results for "Order of the Holy Cross" in the following order:
* Anglicans first
* Then Melkites
* Then Crosiers
* Then ~Opus Angelorum
Also, Anglicans use OHC, Crosiers use OSC, and Opus Angelorum uses ORC (Melkites are ??). So, the correct way to do it is probably use "Order of the Holy Cross" for the Anglican article, "Crosiers" for the Crosiers, and "Order of Canons Regular" for Opus Angelorum (the Melkites do not have an article yet apparently). For this ambiguation page all four will be listed, but I suggest that the "Congregation of the Holy Cross" be aded which, even though it is not an order, could easily be confused as one and may actually be more well-known than the other orders (they staff Notre Dame University in the USA). "Canons Regular" needs ~Opus Angelorum and Crosiers added if they are not there already. "Order of the Holy Cross should reference this this disambiguation page like it does currently. The Crosiers should have a disambiguation at the top with a link to Opus Angelorum, and vice versa. "Order of the Holy Cross (Canons Regular)," "Order of Canons Regular of the Holy Cross," "Order of the Canons Regular of the Holy Cross," "Order of Canons Regular (Holy Cross)," and "Order of the Canons Regular (Holy Cross)" should all be linked to one disambiguation page which has the Crosiers and Opus Angelorum. Also, the Crosiers and Opus Angelorum should be on other Augustinian related pages if applicable.JBogdan 23:22, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Order of the Holy Cross

message: If Order of the Holy Cross is going to be a disambiguation redirect, so too should Order of St. Benedict and other pages that currently direct to the article on the Roman Catholic order of that name. Fishhead64 06:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: None of the communities listed on the dab page have exactly the name "Order of the Holy Cross." What is the "host of religious communities which use the name"? Carolynparrishfan (talk) 13:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:SMS Grosser Kurfürst (1875)

message: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-kent-52923441
©Geni (talk) 05:00, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, the article is updated. Parsecboy (talk) 13:23, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: News on the status of the wreck
Talk:SMS Kaiser (1911)

message: The lead states "during which she was hit once"; the article states "Kaiser was hit twice in quick succession by heavy-caliber shells". I am inclined to believe the second statement, which is sourced to Campbell. Which I don't have access to to check. Could someone check and change the lead to "twice"? (Or alter the main text appropriately.) Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 16:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, good catch! Parsecboy (talk) 17:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Instant response :-) , impressive. Just demonstrating that I am paying attention.  Gog the Mild (talk) 17:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of hits suffered at Jutland 
Talk:Kaiser-class battleship

message: You say that all five were interned in the lead, but that only four were scuttled. What happened to the fifth? Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:22, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That was a screw-up on my part; all 5 were scuttled and sunk (the times are given in the body). Thanks for catching that. Parsecboy (talk) 00:28, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: The quoted shell weight of 666 pounds is totally wrong. Try 894 pounds. http://navalhistory.flixco.info/H/95736x53535/8330/a0.htm   http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNGER_12-50_skc12.htmRcbutcher (talk) 15:49, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've corrected the article. MV looks suspect too. Rcbutcher (talk) 15:55, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh, that was apparently a screw up reading the table in Conway's. The 666lb figure, along with the muzzle velocity, are actually for the 28cm guns on the Nassau class/Von der Tann. I've updated the muzzle velocity accordingly. Thanks for catching that. Parsecboy (talk) 16:08, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shell weights for 30.5 cm guns

message: The picture from the Kiel week is not a Kaiser class ship, that can be clearly seen from the superstructure. If you click on the picture it says it is the "Rheinland" which seems reasonable.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarhunnas (talk • contribs) 
:No, that is not correct. The photo is the battleship Kaiser - see the discussion here for starters. Also, compare the photo to this photo of Kaiser, and this actual photo of Rheinland; you should be able to see quite clearly the different superstructure on Rheinland. Lastly, compare the bow crest to this photo of Kaiser, you can see that it is identical; Rheinlands crest is similar but not the same (note for instance Kaisers crest is upright, while Rheinlands is canted to one side). Parsecboy (talk) 16:41, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:SMS Prinzregent Luitpold

message: I think this is wrong:the eighth ship in the line, directly astern of Kaiserin and ahead of Friedrich der Grosse. What I remember is that Friedrich der Grosse was the eighth, so Prinzregent_Luitpold should be the seventh. --Demostene119 (talk) 14:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you're right. The four Königs led the line, followed by Kaiser, Kaiserin, then Prinzregent Luitpold. I'll fix it shortly - good catch. Parsecboy (talk) 16:46, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  the eighth ship in the line? 

message: I don't speak German, Russian or Estonian.  So I can't 100% verify this is true.
The wiki page for Tagalaht (a bay in the Baltic Sea) says that it is between the Tagamõisa peninsula and another place.  It also says that in German the Tagamõisa peninsula is called Hundsort.  They are all in the right area, but that doesn't mean that I got everything right.
If this is true, it would be nice if someone who can verify it would add a link from Hundsort to Tagamõisa.  Or, since there are very few references to Hundsort in the English wikipedia pages, just change this pages link to Tagamõisa.
2600:8801:8500:269:E9A4:DE00:9569:BC3D (talk) 10:07, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created a redirect for it - Hundsort is also the name of the location in Swedish, so it's worthwhile to have the redirect established. Parsecboy (talk) 12:46, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link for Hundsort
Talk:Soul to Soul (film)

message: Several at the show remarked that Santana, despite having only one black member, played the most "African-sounding" music of the night. Some have argued that the band's merger of Latin rhythms with rock music strongly influenced the development of Afrobeat.
Can someone cite sources for these claims? —mjb 06:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Santana comments
Talk:Michel Poniatowski

message: I started to translate the French article to here as it didn't exist yet. It's going somewhat slowly, as my French is not perfect, but I am managing to get something out of it. If anyone who does know better French would ensure that it is indeed translated properly, that would be swell. Kaiser matias 06:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Started this Article 
Talk:Xolotl

message: The short description when one hovers over a link to this page is 
"In Aztec mythology, Xolotl was a
god of ramen and candy. He was
commonly depicted as a butt-
headed man and was a lick-guide
for the red. He was also god of
twins, monsters, misfortune,
sickness, and deformities. Xolotl is
the canine brother and twin of
Quetzalcoatl, the pair being so"
None of this appears in the source code, so I'm at a loss as to how to fix it.  PtolemyXV (talk) 15:02, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism on Short Description
Talk:SMS Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm

message: 71.28.83.87 (talk) 11:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a valid point. Thanks for fixing it. Parsecboy (talk) 12:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: World War I

message: 71.28.83.87 (talk) 11:48, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason I kept it as "ship of the line" is because the Germans didn't refer to them as "pre-dreadnought." For instace, Erich Gröner's German Warships 1815-1945, which relies on official German documents, refers to the ships as "ships of the line." The later Scharnhorst and Bismarck classes are simply "battleships." Parsecboy (talk) 12:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Linienschiff

message: Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/SMS Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:56, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  TFAR 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:S.M. Linienschiff Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm - restoration, border removed.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on January 4, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-01-04. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:S.M. Linienschiff Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm - restoration, border removed.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Nanahuatzin

message: This needs to be discussed first. What's the most common English language name? Maybe "Nanahuatzin"? Dougweller (talk) 19:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it needs to be moved. It is written in outdated orthography.--Ephert (talk) 14:24, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Any suggestions as to the best choice? Dougweller (talk) 13:56, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article move
Talk:Brian Trenchard-Smith

message: Created article. - KB 06:35, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The 1995 movie Sahara is not listed despite being one of his works and i wish to have this problem addressed 99.6.146.219 (talk) 02:05, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sahara
Talk:Lloyd Bacon

message: Did this guy direct Footlight Parade? I think it should be mentioned. ChildofMidnight (talk) 17:29, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The second paragraph of the Early Life section is missing something. It starts "Later the co-author and star of the long-running Broadway show Lightnin' (1998), and Jennie (Weidman) Bacon. . . ." It sound as if the author was the star of a show after he died, and then continues the sentence with something unrelated. Part of the paragraph seems like it might be about his father or parents. Needs attention. Does not make sense. Astrid999 (talk) 20:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Life sentence doesn't make sense
Talk:SMS Mainz

message: this article simply reprints most of the 'First Battle of Heligoland Bight ' article. Is there much point to this? David.j.james 12:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewrote parts of it to focus on SMS Mainz as such.Cosal 16:37, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant info?
Talk:SMS Moltke

message: "Chief of Staff of the Prussian Army in the mid 18th century" or "19th century German general"? Which is it?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  05:12, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Another dang typo...thanks for pointing that out. Your section header made me think of The Who :) Parsecboy (talk) 13:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Who are you?

message: The article needs to be clearer as to the distribution of the main battery, looking at the pics, it looks like 5x2 turrets, with three turrets on the centreline and two wing turrets, but someone with a source should put it in the article.KTo288 (talk) 09:49, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a description of the main battery. I had left this sort of technical detail for the class article, but can see how it would be useful here. Regards, Parsecboy (talk) 11:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.KTo288 (talk) 17:24, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Armament layout

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:SMS Moltke Hampton Roads 1912 FINAL.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 23, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-08-23. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 20:43, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:SMS Moltke Hampton Roads 1912 FINAL.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: The Battle of Dogger Bank section mentions HMS Queen Mary, however this ship was not present at the battle. Likely this is supposed to be HMS Princess Royal.
The source is a German perspective book, they believed it was Queen Mary but were mistaken during the battle. Princeblip (talk) 16:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See above :-) Ed [talk] [OMT] 02:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch, I've fixed it. Parsecboy (talk) 12:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Dogger Bank section
Talk:SMS Nürnberg (1906)

message: I'm having a problem with the September 8 date for the dispatching of SMS Nurnberg to Honolulu, which is given in every article concerning the movements of Graf Spee's squadron. Most of the articles are accompanied by a map showing Nurnberg as being dispatched from Eniwetok, where the squadron recoaled on August 20, and rejoining the group at Christmas Island, which is usually given as September 6. On that same evening Nurnberg was sent to Fanning Island to destroy the wireless station there. It's possible she was sent to Honolulu a second time on the 8th, but the map doesn't show it and it's not mentioned that this is a second trip.
According to the well-researched book Graf Spee's Raiders: Challenge to the Royal Navy 1914-1915, by Keith Yates, Naval Institue Press 1995 Nurnberg was dispatched from Eniwetok on August 22 and rejoined Spee on the afore-mentioned September 6.
I am reluctunt to changed the article without discussing it first, as I could be wrong and I don't want to cause trouble for whoever would have to follow it up.
Steven E. Bradfield
Sebradfield (talk) 17:50, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree with  about the September 8 date being in error.  Hawaiian newspapers from that year report Nurnberg arriving in Honolulu on July 1st, and then leaving suddenly on July 27th, but no definite reports until her return to Honolulu on September 1st.  Even then, she was allowed to load only enough coal to get her to the nearest German port (750 tons).  As was the case in August, there was little news of her whereabouts for some time after that, and I could find nothing about her returning to Honolulu again. It could be possible Spee gave orders on September 8th, but then rescinded them due to concern there may be British, Australian and Japanese warships lying in wait. KMJKWhite (talk) 02:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honolulu, September 8 

message: Here and here. Parsecboy (talk) 13:14, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos
Talk:Omaha Public Schools

message: Three different articles all contain (mostly redundant) information about the Omaha "one city, one school district" controversy, so it should probably be extracted and centralized into a single article. ⇔ ChristTrekker 16:02, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  mergeto 

message: The Omaha Public School district was not broken up into three separate districts, so something must have happened between 2006 and now to prevent that. Article should be updated to reflect whatever caused that to not happen. Mharriger (talk) 15:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Found the relevant information and updated the article. Mharriger (talk) 16:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  One City, One School District
Talk:David Theile

message: Is the correct name David Theile or David Thiele? Online references seem to be split. The ABC Olympic history even manages one spelling for the 1956 and 1960 Olympics, and the other for the Olympic swimming page! --Scott Davis Talk 06:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Australian Olympic Committee historians and website, who also wrote the book I used, Theile. Also, whoever wrote the other WP swim articles (not Aussie contributors) seem to have overseas sources which also agree. Some are American I think.Blnguyen | rant-line 06:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough - it's just an unusual spelling. Do you think it should have a redirect? --Scott Davis Talk 22:57, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not? If others make the error a lot, then one should be there.Blnguyen | rant-line 00:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:SMS Preussen (1873)

message: Please help identify whether :File:Ein Tagebuch in Bildern Preussen.jpg is a photo of SMS Preussen (1873).--The Master (talk) 01:08, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's certainly a passenger ship; this photo purports to show a ship named Preussen in Genoa in 1902 - this Preussen had long-since been reduced to a harbor ship in Wilhelmshaven by that point (and more importantly, the two ships don't resemble each other at all). We don't have any articles on any passenger ships by that name, but the Encyclopaedia of Ships and Shipping mentions one steamer named Preussen that was owned by Norddeutscher Lloyd (it is also listed on that article in the table toward the bottom), which is probably the ship in the photo. The only other civilian Preussen I'm aware of is a 5-masted clipper ship, and this one is very clearly a steamer. Parsecboy (talk) 11:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Ein Tagebuch in Bildern Preussen.jpg]]
Talk:Minna no Uta

message: "Everyone's songs"? Surely "Songs for everyone" is a better fit?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.243.195.136 (talk) 14:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Literal the existing translation may be, but the way the expression is used seems closer to how "songs for everyone" would be used in English.  That is to say, the intended meaning seems to be that these are songs that everyone can appreciate.  Joren (talk) 07:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Everyone's Songs? 

message: So...er...doesn't this article kind of fall under WP:DIRECTORY?  Joren (talk) 07:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Is Not a Directory 

message: Underneath the logo image, it says, "Minna no Uta logo from before 1995. The logo has never changed since it started broadcast."
However, if the logo never changed since broadcast, what is the significance of the year 1995? Saying that this is the logo before 1995 seems to imply that after 1995 the logo was changed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SarahTehCat (talk • contribs) 11:23, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory Logo Text? 

message: do u have a numbr of epoidses  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.157.176 (talk) 10:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  epoidse count
Talk:Framboise

message: "Framboise" is a (usually French) eau de vie, it is neither a beer nor even a liqueur.
This page should definitely be corrected, and/or redirect to "eau de vie".
205.158.168.99 21:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  almost right  
Talk:AN-94 Abakan

message: Please add these references to the two pages List of firearms in films and List of firearms in video games. Wikipedia is not a list of trivia and unless these appearances in pop culture form an important part of the firearms history (perhaps like the PPK and James Bond) then it can be mentioned, otherwise it does not belong here.  Deon Steyn 06:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: In popular culture