Talk:Eastern Mennonite University

message: Someone has clearly put a lot of work into this article because he or she loves EMU. I think that's wonderful, and there are clearly references to their sources.  However, the article itself does not seem to be written from an objective point of view - rather it highlights only the disctinctives and positive attributes of the college.  I am interested in someone changing the article to a more neutral point of view, or at least, adding in some balance the article.
Looking at other institutions' pages like Harvard or University of Virginia, for example, would give a better idea of how to edit this piece.  In reading this, EMU seems like the Garden of Eden. Has there been any controversy on campus?  What do students fight/ or what historically have they fought about (there has to be arguments)?  For example: As a church school, how has EMU's stance on homosexuality played out?  As a peace school, how has not playing the national anthem played as to who the university is?  How are community relations?  Has anyone gotten injured on a cross cultural? Asking more probing questions makes the article more relevant and ties it into historical context with larger issues/ themes within the city of Harrisonburg. My current opinion is that the citations make it read like a persuasive essay rather than an objective document. (Hochstetler51 (talk) 15:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: did some editing and removed tag; hope it's better now. let me know what we think. Aepoutre 19:41, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement & POV

message: The current logo is reversed: white on a blue background; the official logo is white with a blue graphic element and gray text.  Somebody should replace it with http://www.emu.edu/marketing/identity/images/EMUlogo-color.jpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimenno (talk • contribs) 20:38, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. ✤ JonHarder talk 20:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Official Logo

message: This article is still clearly in need of work.  I personally question the merit of it's current "B" rating  compared to others I have seen.  So perhaps I am over reacting because I have invested some time to cleaning it up, but the article was subject to recent edits or cuts, that in the name of removing "a bunch of unsupported info and subjective language", cut out a large, as well as very relevant and important, part of the story of this institution.
The whole story of EMU's reversal in course on its stand over the issue of homosexual relations/marriage and the resulting controversy it created in the Christian world and particularly within the CCCU (of which it was a founding member) is not simply an inconvenient truth to be stricken or whitewashed out of the story of EMU. Rewrite it - perhaps - but to expunge this information entirely from the record does the reader a disservice.  Experienced editors, please weigh if I am wrong on this. Jsniessen (talk) 15:04, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I am going to begin to carefully restore much of the material recently deleted by User:Ronnyspock, all of which is very well documented. Jsniessen (talk) 18:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

text: I have completed re-instating much (but not all) of the recently deleted content concerning the schools change in stance on it's views of marriage and sexuality and the ensuing controversy with the CCCU.  Certainly, there are still organizational and editing tasks left to be done here. User:Ronnyspock and others, please kindly dialogue here next time before gutting 1/4 of the article's diligently sourced content. Jsniessen (talk) 17:55, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Edits

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Eastern Mennonite University. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090211084604/http://kroc.nd.edu/newsevents/news/peacebuilders-share-work-and-wisdom-apprentices-worldwide-485 to http://kroc.nd.edu/newsevents/news/peacebuilders-share-work-and-wisdom-apprentices-worldwide-485
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5QWC79Xcp?url=http://www.emu.edu/ to http://www.emu.edu/
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5QWC79Xcp?url=http://www.emu.edu/ to http://www.emu.edu/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Trikekus (:3) 01:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed