Talk:The Wind in the Willows

message: I am moving this article to , but am unsure whether it should be considered a stub any longer. BonsaiViking 20:42, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub categorization 

message: There are enough pop-culture references to it, besides adaptations, to justify a section mentioning the aspects that support the references.  I'm thinking of at least Mr Toad's Wild Ride (at both Disneyland and Disney World?), Toad Hall dormitory, and Toad's Place.--Jerzy•t 03:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details 

message: What is the difference?71.63.88.111 (talk) 19:51, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia vs. Miscellany

message: What company did the 1996 animated version?
*Was there one?  I remember one from about then (maybe earlier) using Clay Mation and made by Cosgrove Hall--TimothyJacobson (talk) 16:35, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The 1996 animated film

message: :Image:WNDB.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:57, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:WNDB.jpg

message: Not withstanding the fact that it was published in 1908 - 7 years into the reign of Edward VII - it seems to reflect Edwardian society more. As indeed it ought to. Plutonium27 20:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll remove the paragraph. If there are objections it can always be restored later. ssepp(talk) 18:51, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can agree it is possibly more Edwardian than Victorian, as motor cars were rarer in Queen Victoria's lifetime than Edward VII's reign, and a verse in a poem Toad recites to himself refers to a queen waiting at Buckingham Palace for someone who might either be the King (Victoria only had a Prince Consort) or Kitchener, who was a rising military star then after the Boer War.Cloptonson (talk) 18:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victorian? 

message: I saw the 1985 film in 1984 on television. I still have the video cassette of it (I taped it).
It was definitely '84 as it had advertisements in it that could only have been screened in 1984 (including mention of the 1984 Australian Olympic team going to LA).
Was it screened earlier in Australia and other countries????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.94.167.145 (talk) 14:40, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 1985 film, I saw in '84 

message: I'm going through some WikiProject Children's literature articles and I noticed that this article was rated High importance. However, I think that it should be Top importance, as it's a classic in children's literature. Any comments? Mr. Absurd (talk) 04:32, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Jolly good idea. Xxanthippe (talk) 11:13, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance scale

message: (Question transferred to Titled section) I've heard that Wind in the Willows initially flopped, but was revived by A. A. Milne and his stage adaptation of Toad of Toad Hall. Does anyone know anything more about this? -- Alex Watson 21:26, 22 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  An initial flop? 

message: I'd support the redistribution of the items currently listed under the Miscellany section into expanded text elsewhere, but pending that, an additional item I'll note here is the existence of the short-lived American folk-rock band The Wind in the Willows, which included the pre-Blondie Debbie Harry, and whose eponymous and only album included (as Side One, Track Five) "There Is But One Truth, Daddy" incorporating textual recitation from the book, and whose sleeve art (by Howard Bernstein) included depictions of the books's four main characters. 87.81.230.195 (talk) 19:25, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional miscellany item (prior to redistribution) 

message: Not only does the Editions section look incomplete, but don't many of the entries just read like advertisments for recently published editions? 86.156.184.219 (talk) 02:36, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Editions Section Necessary? 

message: I always thought that this book was called "The wind 'and' the willows." Personally i feel it has a better ring to it. Maybe there could be a part of the article that references this misconception and outlines it as blantently wrong? 32.152.157.247 (talk) 19:36, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion of title 

message: I'm rating this as B in it's current state. In my opinion the plot section is too long, and some of the Wikilinks need to be finessed so they don't look so messy. Also, the quote under literary analysis is nice, but it isn't actually analyzing the book as a literary piece, so it's misnamed, I think. 
But there's a lot of info in here, and it's pretty well organized. If someone wanted to clean it up I think they could nominate it for GA or FA. Good work, everybody! Tlqk56 (talk) 00:44, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reassment 

message: According to Wiki, the ride closed over a decade ago-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mr._Toad%27s_Wild_Ride  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.93.121.109 (talk) 19:16, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney Ride Closed 

message: Putting the cat weasel among the pigeons toads, is it just me or does this article now look out of balance re. the 'Adaptions' section is getting waaaayyyy toooooo long:) - could this be turned into a separate list?, although quite a few are redlinks, so are they notable?  Also, we need to keep an eye on the popular culture section which can easily get out of hand.  Comments?  Coolabahapple (talk) 16:36, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. For a start I suggest that all unsourced material could be removed. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:51, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. If it's not referenced remove it. Who cares that a record label was named after Mr Toad anyway, and what does that bit of trivia tell us about the book? The separate list for adaptions is a good idea too. Richerman   (talk) 09:32, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Balance 

message: Substituted at 08:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: The reception page is pretty short, and only really contains one review of Wind in the Willows after it was initially released. Is there a reason why the article doesn't contain a variety of receptions?Chw53 (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: So basically 185.187.76.27 (talk) 12:34, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literature 

message: "The Wind in the Willows is a classic children's novel by the British novelist Kenneth Grahame, first published in 1908."
Is it ok to call something a "classic" as a factual statement in an encyclopedia? Isn't it more of a subjective thing rather than saying "it is widely regarded as a classic"? I'm asking out of curiosity. Dornwald (talk) 22:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: - if the sources call it a classic, and they do, then so can we. KJP1 (talk) 10:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Classsic"