lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Backward-compatible video game consoles

message: Why is the PlayStation 3 not listed here? --164.107.92.120 17:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The FC Twin Video Game System that plays both NES and SNES games needs to be in this category as well for obvious reasons. --164.107.92.120 17:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Consider it done! :) --Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? 21:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Should Xbox 360 hardware, and to a lesser extent Wii, be listed? First of all, the Xbox 360 doesn't have real backwards compatibility per se, as it uses software emulation. Therefore while you can argue that the Xbox 360 has backwards compatibility, the hardware certainly doesn't. And the Wii simply has you download the games and play them back via emulation as well.(Myscrnnm 00:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Wii hardware is backward-compatible with GameCube. Sw2k7 (talk) 15:59, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

message: Why is the Playstation 3 listet here?
The newer Versions dont even start most PS2 games.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.13.186.1 (talk) 21:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They still run PS1 games just as well as any other PS3 model. Sw2k7 (talk) 15:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  PlayStation 3 

message: Does the Amiga CD32 count? It could play most Commodore CDTV titles. Suddenly There Is a Valley (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: CD32

message: Yesterday at E3, during the conference, the company announced they would support reverse compatibility with Xbox 360 games. Please, make the change.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:1108:6049:6415:7CE:FD43:7BC0 (talk) 22:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xbox One
Talk:Herman Gardens

message: I changed "Automobile giant John Z. Deloren" to John De Lorean, but I had to tag it fact because there is no mention of this in the John De Lorean article so I can't be absolutley sure I just fixed the spelling to conform with the article so the link worked (however, John De Lorean has middle name Zachary).  If someone can confirm this please remove the tag for fact. RJFJR 17:12, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mokoliʻi

message: The lead ends: :"previously there were a few"  Is there something that needs to be added? clariosophic (talk) 11:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete sentence ?
Talk:Symphony No. 49 (Haydn)

message: Hello DavidRF. I see you've changed the date from 1768 to 1770-71. Could you indicate your source for this? I based 1768 on Robbins Landon (Haydn Symphonies, BBC), Pierre Barbaud (Haydn, Seuil (in French)) and Nicholas Kenyon (sleeve notes to Archiv recording). It's also the date indicated in List of symphonies by Joseph Haydn. Thanks and best wishes--Zeisseng 17:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: allmusic.com also says 1768.  OK, I changed it back.  I was using David Hurwitz's Haydn book that has a slick table in the back listing the date, key and scoring for all the symphonies.  Hurwitz is more of a convenient reference than a scholarly reference like Robbins Landon, though.  He probably copied the date wrong (or perhaps I copied it wrong from the book).  Thanks for catching this. DavidRF 18:35, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hoboken bases this on the autograph which actually says "768". (Book 1, p.61). Published by Sieber in 1771 together with symphony 41 and a pastiche in B-flat 2 movements of which are from Michael Haydn symphonies and one movement from a Joseph Haydn symphony (the pastiche is given I:B2, I think, in Hoboken's appendix in Book 1, p.269.) (Possibly published earlier.) Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:17, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of composition 

message: Please delete "continuo"! Haydn didn't use continuo in his symphonies. See James Webster, On the absence of keyboard continuo in Haydn's symphonies, in: Early Music, XVIII/4 (1990), p. 599-608.
77.11.105.177 (talk) 11:29, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scoring
Talk:Maplin (retailer)

message: The logo has changed slightly. It no longer says "The electronics specialist", and the dot over the "i" is round and the same colour, not square and black. If anyone wants to update it, it's here. If you click on the old logo:  there's a notice indicating that there shouldn't be any copyright issues with it: "This logo image consists only of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection, and is therefore in the public domain." In fact, I think the "new" logo is the one that was mostly used in the past. Best wishes, Pol098 (talk) 22:58, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current logo
Template talk:Lockheed Martin aircraft

message: I have a feeling that I missed some of them.  This is the list from the article on lockheed.  Feel free to add any that I missed! Thanks - Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 17:14, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Just to be pedantic but this template should really be :Template:Lockheed aircraft to match the others ! MilborneOne (talk) 21:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: True, then again we have !! Standardisation is good as it lessens the confusion for new editors (and even existing ones!). It would be nice to find an article that needs a navbox and be able to have a very good guess at what the template format would be. I think I created some that are not the right format but they were gliders not aircraft, (I'll get my coat!) Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 22:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! This also helps deter the aircraft navboxes being "hijacked" to add other products, such as missiles, to the template. It's happened a couple of times, but nothing too intrusive. Template:Honda is an example of a template listing all of a company's products, but it originally created to list cars and motorcycles. - BilCat (talk) 23:48, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks MilborneOne (talk) 12:43, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Template name

message: According to Secret Projects forum the Basic Model Number for the U-2 is L-342, while the TDN is CL-351.
The -351 mark for the TDN is confirmed by Global Security (but not the L-342).
Scramble mentions TDN's CL-282 for the U-2A and CL-351 for the TR-1/U-2R variants (but again not the L-342).
I know there is quit some confusion on the Lockheed designations (not to mention the Lockheed-Georgia and Vega ones..), but before I change the template to L-342/CL-282/CL-351, are there reasons why I shouldn't? --Antheii (talk) 11:48, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  U-2 

message: I would like to move 
* P-3
* EP-3
* CP-140
* P-7
from under L-188 Electra section to the Maritime patrol section and add a footnote to L-188 saying that it was developed into the others. Although the P3, etc. were developed from transport aircraft they are maritime patrol aircraft and are widely known as such. Please let me know if you have any issues. Gusfriend (talk) 02:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move P3, EP3, CP-140 and P7 to Maritime Patrol instead of transport
Talk:Minnesota's congressional districts

message: He is a resident of Woodbury MN https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Lewis_(Minnesota_politician).  Isn't the city in parenthesis after each congressman's name supposed to be the city in which each respective congressman resides? Quarky Gluon (talk) 09:05, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is 'Burnsville' in parenthesis after Jason Lewis's name?  
Template talk:NYC terminals

message: I find it interesting that the template is called intercity terminals, yet lists LIRR stations, which have never served intercity trains. Methinks a name change is in order. And Secaucus Junction should be added, as well. It's rather comparable to Jamaica, and if the Jamaica article is to be believed, actually busier. oknazevad (talk) 20:24, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name issue

message: According to this map, there are a few more former stations on the Jersey side of the Hudson that should be added. What's the story with them? ----DanTD (talk) 16:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The other highlighted facilities were freight yards, not passenger terminals, which is the focus of this template. oknazevad (talk) 15:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing terminals 

message: I'm debating where the original version of New York Penn Station should be added on the navbox; Either as a former station, or in parentheses and smaller print next to the existing station. I may just be bold and add them to both, and see which one will work. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  16:52, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think we need to add it at all. It's still the same station, at the same location, with the same tracks and platforms. One link to it is sufficient. I also don't think that separate article, an unneeded content fork that was shot down in discussion years ago until one editor misread the discussion and decided to copy the entire section verbatim. It's a mess, and should just be re-merged. If we must include a link, I prefer the entirely separate link in the historic section; the parenthesis just look terrible. oknazevad (talk) 17:02, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Penn Station
Talk:Whipple Jones (The Bold and the Beautiful)

message: HOW CAN A RUN OF 8 MONTHS EQUATE TO NOTABILITY? IT DOESN'T. User:Yrgh
:The character married Brooke, that is notable. TheRhani 06:02, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maggi Payne

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. Please put any questions on my talk page. -- GDon4t0 (talk to me...) 16:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Ballet Folklórico de México

message: I have never ever heard this ensemble referred to as "Mexican Folkloric Ballet" - I think it should be moved to "Ballet Folklorico de Mexico," the proper name of the troupe, which would still be understood by anyone, regardless of language. - AKeen 15:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: This entire article was apparently ripped off, verbatim, from http://www.houstonculture.org/mexico/ballet.html.  Give credit where credit is due!  Also, some portions appear to be written in first person and others include irrelevant references to other cultural information that would be better linked to than explained here.  Also, note that https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Baile_Folkl%C3%B3rico is another page that exists already.  Shouldn't these be merged?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.254.85.2 (talk) 19:23, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:Major Henderson incident

message: This article says:</br></br>
"A North Korean Reporter...ordered Major Henderson to move out of his way. When Major Henderson refused to obey the order, the reporter spat on him. Major Henderson stood up and the North Korean reporter struck the Major. Major Henderson returned the punch and several North Korean guards then attacked him."
</br>
Meanwhile Joint Security Area states:</br></br>
"...a DPRK journalist...verbally accosted Major Henderson...When Major Henderson failed to respond to the verbal insults and rude gestures, the journalist struck him in the face. Rising to protect himself, Major Henderson was attacked from behind by a KPA guard..."
The implication of this article is that Henderson punched the reporter and was immediately attacked by a number of North Koreans. The other article implies that Henderson was simply moving defensively (not necessarily to attack) which was immediately followed by an attack by only one person and therefore that Henderson did not actually hit the reporter. This might simply be a case of the accounts being unclear but this should be cleared up.
--(Made formatting changes)Hydraton31 21:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't there for this incident, I didn't arrive until September 1975, so I can't claim to be witness to this. The other guys who were there simply said Maj. Henderson was attacked, but not how it started. I think what we have is just a case of the two reports not being clear. I do know from other occasions, the "official" report from the Army is intentionally vague. wbfergus 23:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The other article seems to actually be a direct copy of the second source of this article (copyright is acceptable since the site is a work of the US military) so the other source probably needs to be checked. Is there an official Army report on this incident as that would be a valuable source? --Hydraton31 05:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible contradiction? 

message: Han Chol, after making an insulting comment to a ROK newsman, indicated in words and gestures that he wanted Henderson to move his cap (which was on the bench).  Henderson didn't reply so Han Chol climbed on the bench and sat on the backrest (maybe kicking Henderson's cap in the process).  After climbing up on the bench Han Chol began making derisive comments and gestures with his hands (pretending to pick his nose and flick it at Henderson) while another Nork took pictures.  Henderson then stood up and exchanged words with Han Chol (both sides using strong language).  Han Chol then struck Henderson.  All witnesses agree that Han Chol struck first, but vary on force and nature of blow.  
Above summary from Report of Proceedings by Investigating Officer (not dated - but reported on 6 July 1975).  Sure looks like another "vague" official report.  I'm too lazy and apathetic now to want to contribute to any wikipedia article, but you can if you request a copy of the unclassified report from UNCMAC.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.59.12.230 (talk) 07:22, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Report
Talk:Suzuki LS650 Savage

message: The camshaft oiling problem seems to be debated among several LS650 owners I know.  Could someone cite some sources?
Anyone have any history or etymology for the term "Thumper"?  Obviously suggests a connection to Dune, since the engine has a single very large vertical piston (like the Fremen thumpers), but I'd be interested to see mention of it in the article if there are sources.  :)  Lihan161051 22:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The camshaft issue used to crop up time and again on the newsgroups back then. It is no problem whatsoever to find plenty of owners' reports who suffered this defect on groups.google.com. (It IS indeed a problem to find an LS that has clocked more than 12,000 miles WITHOUT this failure, so I find the word "reliability" somewhat misplaced in this wiki.)--Cancun771 13:53, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Suzuki_LS650_Savage and Suzuki_Boulevard_S40 are the same vehicle with only a different name and minor cosmetic changes.  As the S40 is the current model, I propose that the LS650 page redirect to the S40 page. MoofedOne (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Category talk:Bulandshahr

message: This category will act as starting category for grouping pages related to Bulandshahr at one place and will also act as networking place to help improve pages related to Bulandshahr. May be wikipedian can create a new user category e.g. Category:Bulandshahr Wikipedians to collaborate more effectively. Vjdchauhan 17:37, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Effective and localised collaboration
Talk:NSW Rail Museum

message: Includes 3801 which isn't at Thirlmere 
Doesn't include 3830 which was at Thirlmere until two days ago (or so) 
Do we need an owner column ?
Dave Rave (talk) 02:46, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Stock 

message: I have removed the collection list entirely as all assets are now owned by THNSW
This edit seems to be removed a lot 
Look on the THNSW website before changing edits  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DCook58 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about the museum at Thirlmere, not all exhibits are owned by THNSW, e.g. 6029, it is therefore appropriate to retain, irrespective of the fact that most are owned by THNSW. Jaegiles (talk) 07:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly, the article is about the physical museum, not just the former society. Yes there is some duplication, but not all THNSW assets are located at the NSW Rail Museum, and likewise not all NSW Rail Museum exhibits are owned by THNSW. It is thus correct to include a cited list of exhibits at the museum. For the recored, I did not delete any cites as asserted in the last edit summary, merely reinstated some taking it from 13 to 34, so can we drop the 'vandalism' rubbish. Siighns (talk) 06:41, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collection list
Talk:Madrid Atocha railway station

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... I need to see the cha tee t to figure out the train station I'm in.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.28.235.91 (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 
Talk:M50 Toll Bridge

message: As stated in the edit, some of this is slavagable.
The rants can go...
ShakespeareFan00 17:44, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Is the bridge in this article separate from West-Link or East-Link toll bridges? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Miq (talk • contribs) 22:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article covers exactly the same topic as "West-Link" (Same bridge). Have merged the content (1 sentence) that was not already covered in West-Link, and have redirected. Guliolopez 11:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Monostich

message: A monostich is a poem which consists of
'the' single line:
:'Skunks,' the squirrel said, 'are sent to try us.'
:::Ralph Hodgson
That seems to suggest a monostich must contain the quoted line.
Shouldn't it be 'a', and not have a colon, but say the following is an example?
Immutable 17:45, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Allemande

message: This article conflicts with another Wikipedia page, http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Allemande_Left.
:While researching this for my Music History class, I could not find any evidence the term can be related to the French phrase "by the hand", in fact hand in French is spelled "main". The incorrect statement was removed and I also added one reference. Danski14(talk) 04:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:
Template talk:Piper aircraft

message: I think this navbox would benefit from a third group, 'by name'. Not entirely straightforward to do but I think it would be worth the effort. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 18:35, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, I added some names, bit of a problem with "Cub" as Piper Cub redirects to the Piper J-3 Cub but other earlier models were also called "Cub". Perhaps a Piper Cub (disambiguation) might help linked from the top of the J-3. MilborneOne (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job, I think there are a few more templates that need this doing. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 20:29, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a link to the Taylor Cub at the top of the J-3 article as it was sometimes called the Piper Cub when Piper took over the Taylor design. Two other Cubs the "P-2 Cub" and P-4 Cub" dont have articles yet. MilborneOne (talk) 20:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Name group
Talk:Ferrari F310

message: I would suggest a seperate article for the F310B. It was a totally different design with an evolutionary name, not the other way around.Karpouzi (talk) 03:53, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have advertised this discussion at WT:FORMULA1. DH85868993 (talk) 08:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: If the F310 and F310B are very different cars and you're willing to make a new article I see no problem. The actual cars aren't really my area of expertise, so others may have better opinions on whether or not to split the article. QueenCake (talk) 15:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Seperate article for F310B
Category talk:Filipino people stubs

message: Is there any chance of starting a subcategory with the title of "Fillipino-mil-stub"? Just like Poland, or Ireland, European countries that have a signifigant millitary history dating from before they had independence. and continual coflict throughout most of its history. Cheers V. Joe 17:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New subcategory?
Talk:Naringin

message: the structure is wrong. The 3-hydroxyl should be removed. --Kupirijo 17:54, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure

message: The following was removed from the article as preliminary research, WP:PRIMARY, too vague for its relevance to be included in the article. Please review WP:MEDRS for any inference to human biology. Thanks. --Zefr (talk) 01:52, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The research discussion provided below has been done with mice/rat models of obesity and diabetes and this has explicitly been stated several times in the preceding paragraphs. Much of the research presented here has been corroborated and confirmed by secondary research/reviews, unlike "preliminary" research. The lack of clinical/ human based trials has also been noted. Addition of these details to the original page will only enrich the knowledge since the primary focus of research on naringin is with regards to it's anti-oxidant/ anti-inflammatory properties. Without this information, knowledge of this compound is incomplete and I politely ask you to reconsider. Thank you. Shivali313 (talk) 03:55, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a textbook or journal review article needing all this preliminary research. See WP:NOTJOURNAL, numbers 6-8. Please do not add this content to the article. There are no WP:MEDRS-quality sources to support the sections below being included. If you disagree, you can seek arbitration at WT:MED. --Zefr (talk) 04:38, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary research