lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Super Bowl X

message: Greetings ....
This is a personal comment - and "Just Suppose" - about the last play in Super Bowl X.
In watching the NFL Films official highlights of this game, it is plainly obvious that Pittsburgh's Glen Edwards does intercept Staubach's pass in the end zone. But rather than immediately going down on a knee, Edwards instead starts running out of the end zone, back up the field, ball in hand. Eventually, he comes down to a knee, with the ball still in his hands and is touched by the Dallas Cowboys' Blaine Nye (# 61). The play is dead, game over, Steelers win.
Now for the "Just Suppose" ....
Suppose that Edwards, while running up the field, loses the ball before being downed. A Cowboy picks the ball up and runs it back into the Steeler endzone.
Question - Would that not have been a winning touchdown for the Cowboys?
Look forward to a reply. Thank you for your time.
Thanx-A-Lot, Frank Fgf2007 (talk) 00:51, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on Final Play of Super Bowl X 

message: Super Bowl X was the third consecutive Super Bowl to be played on artificial turf, and that "record" has not been equaled since. The only other consecutive Super Bowls on artificial turf were V and VI, and XV and XVI, the latter also being the only time the Super Bowl has been hosted consecutively in domed stadiums.RomeoMike (talk) 02:56, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artificial turf
Talk:Super Bowl XVII

message: Shouldn't this event be included in here?
http://www.alanabel.com/journal_ch1.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Abel
--Goozak 12:09, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alan Abel's hoax at the beginning of second half 
Talk:Super Bowl XVIII

message: I added the ((or)) tag to the following sentences: "Apple's famous "1984" television commercial, introducing the Apple Macintosh computer and directed by Ridley Scott, ran during a timeout in the third quarter. The advertisement changed how the Super Bowl would be used as a media advertising platform." Since there is no footnote for this, from what I can tell is that none of the sources listed support that this commercial changed Super Bowl advertising. Either a source needs to be provided or this should be removed. TheTito Discuss 08:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research 

message: I had to change numerous instances of "Oakland Raiders" to "Los Angeles Raiders" in this article. The Raiders were in Los Angeles during the 1983 NFL season. Please monitor to see if someone tries to change it again. Thank you. DavidSteinle (talk) 01:12, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  It was Los Angeles Raiders, not Oakland Raiders 

message: La Lune Sparkzofgenius (talk) 02:03, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Moon
Talk:Super Bowl XIX

message: Why are the coaches never mentioned? They are not in the body of the article, the information box, or the trivia. It seems like that is an important part of the history. -- Llarq 15:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A funny trivia point: 
in the Sliders episode "Post Traumatic Slide Syndrome", the first hint that the sliders have not reached home in given when Quin discovers a framed paper article about the 49ers defeating the NY Jets in Super Bowl XIX. None of the others is willing to listen to him when he says the Niners beat the Dolphins Moonshadow Rogue (talk) 22:01, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: In the NFL Films recap (Super Bowl XI-XX DVD Collector's Set), they mention San Francisco went to six defensive backs, which is a dime defense.RomeoMike (talk) 08:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game Summary 

message: This article says that Superbowl XIX was the first Superbowl to be broadcast fully in the UK and that the "experiment" was never repeated. When in fact all Superbowls since the early/mid eighties have been shown live in the UK. Either on Channel 4, Sky or as now the BBC!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.147.105.7 (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  International Broadcast 

message: It's over 35 miles from Stanford to San Francisco. Even "The 'Stick" is an even 30—not the 15 mentioned here. Jackrepenning (talk) 06:05, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home Field Advantage
Talk:Super Bowl XXII

message: Super Bowl XXII would be the first of seven consecutive recaps narrated by Jeff Kaye.RomeoMike (talk) 07:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NFL Films recap 
Talk:Super Bowl XXI

message: In the NFL Films DVD versions of "The Official Film of Super Bowl XXI" aka "Land of the Giants", there are no other credits. On amazon.com's listing for the VHS tape, you can deduce the narrator was John Doremus.   In the post John Facenda era, that was three different announcers in as many years.RomeoMike (talk) 03:09, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I noticed the lack of crediting. I think the post-Facenda ones went through Brad Crandall, the announcer guy from the GEICO commercial, and Doremus before WPVI announcer Jeff Kaye became the first post-Facenda primary narrator.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 16:13, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Bowl highlights from NFL Films
Talk:Super Bowl XXIII

message: I am currently getting conflicting stats on Bengals wide receiver Eddie Browns numbers for the game. SuperBowl.com lists that he had 3 receptions for 32 yards.  On the other hand, the book Total Football: The Official Encyclopedia of the National Football League () lists him as having 4 receptions for 44 yards.
To make matter worse, I have a copy of the official NFL Gamebook of the game and I noticed that while it lists in the individual stats section that Brown had 4 catches for 44 yards, the play-by-play listings only has three entries:
*First quarter
**C 26, 1–10, Esiason 17 pass to Brown right (McKyer).
*Second quarter
**C 21, 3–9, Esiason 7 pass to Brown left (Lott).
*Fourth quarter
**C 35, 1–10, Esiason 8 pass to Brown right flat (McKyer).
Looks like I have to research this further. Stay tuned. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 06:46, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stats for Bengals receiver Eddie Brown 

message: I entered the info on the Randy Cross/Chuck Thomas mix-up on NBC. Since there is an all-around crackdown on trivia, I felt it would be best to use a portion of that paragraph in the main summary and delete the rest, only to find that my entry keeps returning to the trivia section AFTER I removed it.
Why is that?  WAVY 10 20:31, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross or Thomas (Who bungled the snap?) 
Talk:Super Bowl XXIV

message: VI was 24-3.  Dolphins had .125 the core of the Cowboys.  In XXIV, Broncos had .182 49ers' score.  Percentagewise (which is what matters in terms of lopsidedness), VI was more lopsided than XXIV.Cromulant (talk) 23:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lopsidedness

message: Listed as over 700,000. ???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.123.151.228 (talk) 04:53, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attendance
Talk:Super Bowl XXVI

message: Where is it, we should re add it to the Article, - GameEnd (talk) 17:27, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Bowl XXVI Logo
Talk:Free-net

message: Does anyone think that the Cleveland Freenet deserves its own page as it was the first of this type of network?  I was a member of the Freenet from 1989-1997 when they shut down.  I loved this resource and am truly disappointed to find that it seems to be missing from the internet in even the smallest references.
:I was on there around then, too.  Who were you?  Cigarette = in210
:If you can get enough stuff on it, sure, I think there's already an article on the National Capital FreeNet. -- Spinboy 6 July 2005 00:13 (UTC)
Take a look at the link that I added to the NPTN Blue Book.  The first section gives a history of how the Cleveland Free-Net started and led to the creation of other Free-Nets.  --Mu301 16:54, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The title of this page should be the proper name Free-Net (not Free-net)  --mikeu (talk) 14:48, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: title

message: Silicon Valley Public Access Link has been in continuous operation since 1994.  http://www.svpal.org  I was a co-founder. Grantbow (talk) 03:56, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: SV-PAL

message: These excess External links were removed from the article as per WP:EL guidelines. Please do not re-add them. -- œ™ 11:19, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: External links cleanup

message: A possible link for improving the article: A Critical Study of Three Free-Net Community Networks --mikeu talk 04:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs
Talk:Super Bowl XXVII

message: The article fails to mention that there were three referendums presented to the voters in 1990. 166.216.160.13 (talk) 14:14, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: @ 5.212.2.11 (talk) 23:09, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arizona and MLK Day 

message: Wasn't this the superbowl where Michael Jackson (stunt double) flew around in a jetpack during halftime?  Dspark76 (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  MJ and the Jetpack 

message: جديد 185.80.141.151 (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  جديد
Talk:Super Bowl XXVIII

message: This isn't too bad, although the blow-by-blow accounts in these Super Bowl articles are a bit too detailed; but while I wouldn't say there is a Bills bias in the article, it definitely seems to have been authored chiefly by a Bills fan, and from a Bills perspective--  hence, all four quotations in the "quotes" section are from Bills, the POV text (as opposed to the pure game-play descriptions) is from the Bills POV, etc.  More balanced is definitely needed, particularly as the Bills LOST the game. 169.253.4.21 18:27, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know what the lead out program for XXVIII was?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nick4404 (talk • contribs) 15:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Happened to see a copy of Broadcasting and Cable archived from 1994 in my school's library. I think it was John Laraquette's show, but I'd have to look it up again.  WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 16:19, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead-Out 

message: Wasn’t it Michael Jackson? Not the Judds?? 2607:FB91:9C8:EC3:3DB9:F9B9:7C74:22B6 (talk) 06:14, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halftime Show 

message: nimagae you want me know what time works you can get it done by tomorrow morning
41.82.169.14 (talk) 11:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salahina nimaga
Talk:Super Bowl XXX

message: I moved some of the trivia to the body; I'm not sure if it's enough to merit removal of the "too much trivia" thing, so I left it. What do people think?
Also, I put in a reference in footnote form, which doesn't seem to go with the references that are there. I'm not sure what to do about that, so I'm mentioning it here.
Brettalan 08:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Removed the comment about Jimmy Johnson and Jerry Jone's having big ego's.  This isn't something that you can document as fact.  It is only heresay and rumor.  If you readd, please not a source for it.
neil blew it and mills getting injured did not help the steelers  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.17.192 (talk) 22:28, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ego's? 

message: Defense is ultimate when you want to win a Super Bowl. They really needed Joe Montana, but unfortunately couldn't get him.Tall short man woman (talk) 10:29, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pittsburgh needed some defense 

message: In the second season of Quantum Leap in the episode "All Americans," Al notes that he is watching Super Bowl XXX and that the Steelers are three points behind. The game did in fact feature the Steelers, who trailed the Dallas Cowboys by three points—20-17—midway through the fourth quarter. This is notable because the episode was filmed over six years before the game actually took place.
I found this interesting enough to add to the talk page but it probably doesn't belong in the main article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.153.29.23 (talk) 22:13, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to be bold and put it in anyway. It's already been noted in the episode description (it was actually late in the fourth quarter, just over 4 minutes left before a turnover cost the Steelers an improbable comeback), and the worst that can happen is that it is reverted. If so, I'll accept that. — Glenn L (talk) 06:52, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quantum Leap 

message: P 2402:3A80:DBC:86CD:CEA5:C257:E522:590C (talk) 06:57, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  P
Talk:Super Bowl XXIX

message: This was the first time NFL Films used Harry Kalas for an "official" Super Bowl highlights video. I state this knowing he has done this kind of narration before (HBO's Inside the NFL recap of SB XVII to cite one example).RomeoMike (talk) 07:29, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NFL Films recap 

message: Are all the Super Bowl pages this rambly?  The first sentence is vague introduction and littered with trivia.  Seriously, do we need bits about "now part of the suburb of Miami Gardens" before even mentioning which teams played in the game?  I don't have enough background on sports pages to intelligently edit this down, but I think it needs a hatchet taken to the introduction.
75.163.232.114 (talk) 19:16, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rambly
Talk:Super Bowl XXXII

message: Under section 'Television and entertainment' and subsection 'Pregame ceremonies', there was a request for additional information regarding the phrase '...recently retired, longtime college football head coach Eddie Robinson...' suggesting that a more specific date for the recent retirement should be provided. But 'recently retired' means to have retired just prior to the time period being discussed. Grambling State coach Eddie Robinson, after 55 years as head coach, had retired just prior to Super Bowl XXXII.
Mr. Veatch (talk) 07:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  {when} Mark Not Needed 

message: Xxxxxxx
Xxx 162.19.214.223 (talk) 15:26, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. ;-) Dgndenver (talk) 05:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

message: Can someone add references in media? E.g. the game is connected to the plot of "This is Us" 2*13-14 Gevorg89 (talk) 12:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in media
Talk:Super Bowl XXXIII

message: Hmm.  Since the Super Bowls that occurred in Houston are part of WikiProject Houston, Talk:Super_Bowl_VIII, and the ones in that occurred in Texas, are under WikiProject Texas, Talk:Super_Bowl_XXXVIII, I believe there should be no problem with having the state of origin be in place when that state is Florida.   Of course, if someone feels so strongly about it that they want to clear all Wikiproject references to major sporting events that occur in the state (Daytona 500, Gator Bowl, Orange Bowl, etc.), more power to them. I would be glad to put a link to all the Super Bowls that Miami participated in, but I chose to bring that up in the project discussion page before doing so, Category_talk:WikiProject_Miami.  CodeCarpenter 21:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Miami and Florida removed. 

message: I have issued a request to have this article to be reassessed. This article clearly does not meet the criteria of a Top article, according to Wikiproject Atlanta.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Connor.carey (talk • contribs) 19:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be ranked as having top importance for Wikiproject Atlanta? 
Talk:Super Bowl XXXV

message: This section mentions Lewis Black and Guitar Hero in reference to the halftime show.  Are both of these references specific to Super Bowl XXXV halftime show?  If so, it needs to state this.  If not, it should be removed.  I will remove it in a few days unless it is changed.  Van Vidrine (talk) 20:16, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Culture Section Relevant? 
Talk:Leap year starting on Friday

message: If January 1, 2100 occurs on a Friday, why is 2100 missing with leap year starting on Friday, what's the difference between common year starting on Friday and leap year starting on Friday.
: The months in the calendar displayed are different from March onwards, because of the presence or absence of February 29. Karl (talk) 11:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2100
Talk:NCAA Division I men's soccer tournament

message: Is the soccer tournament played like a school year from autumn to spring with a winter break, or from spring to autumn?
The season starts in the autumn and ends in December.GnomeV (talk) 01:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I went through some newspaper archives and found a bunch of the missing stadiums. I couldn't find '61 and '62 (probably Francis Field?), and '68. Anyone? GnomeV (talk) 01:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stadiums 
Talk:Bhavatharini

message: Seems to have two entries for the same person? 
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm4934624/
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0704594/
AMCKen (talk) 20:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what that has to do with Wikipedia, but that's probably because the surname is spelt slightly differently. Editrite! (talk) 03:05, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: imdb
Talk:Network service access point address

message: Is also used for SDH and SONET networks...
Yes the SDH/SONET networks are a major part of the current infastructure and as such NSAP's should be mentioned on this page.  They are usually assigned by the Network Management/NOC personell and agreed upon within an organisation to be uniquie and are REQUIRED before any operational connectivity is established at the commisioning stage.
Shall we add this?
Alan Graham
NSPA is not the correct acronym. It actually refers to SNPA (Subnetwork Point of Attachment)
I'll proceed to edit that.
GSJ  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.98.20.194 (talk) 05:16, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Landmark Trust

message: To make the list comprehensive, would it be better to define a category rather than maintain this list, which is constrained as a list of places open on a particular day. jrbray
:: I've tried to make the lists comprehensive but don't know how to work the categories so perhaps someone more wiki-literate than me could have a go at that? Infilms 16:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done it - see :Category:Landmark Trust properties in the United Kingdom Saga City 14:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just the jobby - thank you Infilms 19:22, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: A merge of the content of Manifold Trust was proposed here, but the proposer seemed to be a bit confused as to the procedure. If the content is deleted before it is merged then there will be nothing left to merge, and after merger there needs to be a redirect both to guide readers to the correct article and to maintain the attribution history for copyright purposes. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:29, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Different role to the National Trust – if so, what? This needs mentioning/explaining, as neither page explains their relationship to one another, or why both exist, leaving readers none the wiser. Jimthing (talk) 19:42, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust 
Talk:Campbell Falls State Park Reserve

message: Check 'what links here', there's also a Campbell Park in the UK that's linked. Sounds like we're in need of a page on it and a disambiguation page. --IByte 5 July 2005 22:43 (UTC)
:I've removed the Wikipedia:WikiProject England tag on this article, as it is for the Connecticut park. Markvs88 (talk) 14:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Depolarization

message: All of the grammar and organization looks really good for your article.  I like how you start with a more broad view of depolarization and then narrow in on some key aspects.  However, I would maybe consider expanding upon depolarization blockers and depolarization in the heart.  You could talk about depolarization in other parts of the body and how that helps the body function or how it is harmful.  You could also talk about diseases associated with depolarization, if there are any.  If you wanted, you could also talk more about what action potentials are and what they do.
Shelbyknorr23 (talk) 02:50, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you both for your helpful input. I have made changes accordingly. I did not have the resource used for the depolarization blockers and my textbooks did not go into much detail about them, so further research would need to be done to elaborate on that topic. I did not focus so much on the idea of action potentials, but rather on depolarization because there is a separate page that explains what they are. When considering the ions, the sodium potassium pump is the main component of membrane potentials that maintains the concentration gradients for both sodium and potassium. I have expanded the section on depolarization in the heart to an extent, but tried more so to focus on depolarization in neurons of the brain for the purposes of our class Katelyn0902 (talk) 23:33, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review

message: I am an undergraduate biology student at Clemson University, and I will be working on improving this page for a class project under the supervision of Dr. Lesly Temesvari (Username: LTEMESV).  I will be reorganizing some of the existing information on the page as well as adding information from the following two sources to further expand upon the information already contained on this page as well as to increase the accessibility of the page to those without a background in cellular biology.
Lodish, H., Berk, A., Kaiser, C., Krieger, M., Bretscher, A., Ploegh, H., & Amon, A. (2000). Nerve Cells. In Molecular Cell Biology (7th ed., pp. 695, 1021-1022, 1025, 1045). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Callies, C., Fels, J., Liashkovich, I., Kliche, K., Jeggle, P., Kusche-Vihrog, K., & Oberleithner, H. (2011, June 1). Membrane potential depolarization decreases the stiffness of vascular endothelial cells. Retrieved December 1, 2014.    Prodger1 (talk) 08:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: New class project
Talk:Newark

message: I believe there is a newark in the los angeles area of california. 69.42.5.52 5 July 2005 23:37 (UTC)
:Not that I can find. There is a Norwalk, though. Tonywalton  | Talk 17:56, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  newark in the los angeles area 

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
#Support While a connection to the disambig page is most appropriate, cities like Tampa, Amarillo, and Grand Rapids are of equivalent size and importance to Newark, and they have redirects directly to them as well. Jimbo 15:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: #Support While a connection to the disambig page is most appropriate, cities like Tampa, Amarillo, and Grand Rapids are of equivalent size and importance to Newark, and they have redirects directly to them as well. Jimbo 15:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes

message: #Oppose does a good job of disambig at the moment. GraemeLeggett 15:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Oppose votes

message: Where is that then, I don't think there is one!217.37.182.211 14:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newark, New Zealand
Talk:Igor Oistrakh

message: Is he really a Ukrainian? I've heard he lived the whole life in Moscow and had Russian Naitonality.
He would be more aptly described as a Soviet Jew than as a Ukranian.  That's how Wiki describes his father, David Oistrakh. 71.252.110.40 23:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Was a Russian violinist"?? He's still alive. Sapphicmelodies (talk) 11:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Two authoritative sources (Britannica and Grove) call him a "Ukrainian violinist", so yes. Aza24 (talk) 05:07, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled