lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stonehenge road tunnel

message: Can somebody please find out if a final decision has been made on the plans und update if required.
82.38.56.54 00:56, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Richard B 21:27, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who is this person? For what agency does he work? What is his authority? It's important to provide context for the reader. 
Also, the PDF cited as his report is nearly empty. Suggest either removing it (and therefore the unsourced quote) or improving the citation. John Reid 01:44, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspector Michael Ellison's report 

message: This article is biased heavily against the subject. For example: A tunnel or new road would be an irreversible interference and destruction of a site and monument that we, have no right to damage. This is an opinion and although I tend to share it, that does not make it a fact. Our commitment to neutrality and verifiability excludes such naked statements of opinion. This must be rephrased as a statement of the fact of an opinion held by some person or group -- and must be sourced. John Reid 01:48, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: I have rewritten the article to be more manual of style compliant, add a lot more references and make it more neutral.  I hope that this is an improvement.  What I would like to do is expand the details on the alternatives and find references where there are none so far. Does anyone know of a good source for the alternative routes (I seem to remember 4 or 5 major proposals for the A303 being moved away or tunnelled)? Regan123 02:42, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK I have removed this and the resultant traffic congestion have resulted in The Guardian naming it one of the country's most congested roads as I cannot despite extensive searching find a reference.  I have referenced the rest that I can.Regan123 18:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Given that the proposal has been completely dropped, most of the categories seen misleading.  Maybe a new  category for former proposals is needed? --86.157.186.247 (talk) 21:24, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: This really needs a map showing the proximity of the tunnel to Stonehenge.  Pb8bije6a7b6a3w (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a Map 

message: There was a 2013 feasibility study into the tunnel, which has developed into a preferred route announcement and consultations still under way which isn't reflected in to the 2013 section. In the context of the article this is highly relevant missing information.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.144.180.186 (talk) 12:21, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progress since 2013 needs adding. 

message: All of that would be much easier to understand if we had a drawing showing the current situation and the alternatives considered. Wouldn't have to be perfect. JB. --92.193.207.22 (talk) 16:12, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Wikipedia talk:School and university projects/Piotrus course intro boilerplate/old

message: The project is ATM on hold, but I am trying to use it as a template to spread throughout Pitt. All is in fairly early stages, and any help would be appreciated. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:03, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status 

message: I will transform this into a general boilerplate, easily adaptable to any course.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transform into general template
Talk:Sentiment

message: Sentimentality is the curse of us all!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.114.115 (talk) 04:24, August 24, 2007 (UTC) 
Twaddle. An 18th-century concept, not "medieval."  And Sentimentality blandly redirects here.So how could one begin?  --Wetman 01:22, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of cities in Spain

message: I removed the redirect and created a list in its place. Many other countries seem to have a list of cities & towns listed by name, and the article to which this previously redirected lists (at the time of writing) only 20 towns, and shows no sign of expanding. An alphabetical lost is also useful for someone wishing to find a link to a particular city easily, rather then discover its population. Grunners 04:03, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New article
Talk:Kumba

message: This entire article seems to be talking about Limbe, formerly Victoria, not Kumba. Kumba is not south of Buea, not on the southern slopes of Mt Cameroon, and definitely not a seaside resort. I know - I lived there from 1967 to 1971.
:Thanks for correcting the information. - Darwinek 05:38, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed:
:Kumba is probably the most notorious city in Cameroon. Inhabitants of this rather vibrant cosmopolitan haven are known to be pushful and daring.
:There are probably more people from this city living abroad than any other city in Cameroon. 
:Concerning the indegenes, although there are many families the Esemes are probably the most known and accomplished!
as being POV and unsourced. — BrianSmithson 12:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/September 10, 2005

message: For some strange reason, the picture of the plane isn't appearing on the Main Page for me - it appears as text. Any suggestions why? Enochlau 01:55, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Same here but it went away when i reloaded. Odd, probably come server side bug or somthing (or a cache isssue?). This link is Broken 02:51, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

text: It seems to be there and then gone again. Every time I purge the main page's cache it seems to bring it back temporarily. Unless I'm fooled by my own browser. Something's up. --Fastfission 03:01, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The picture was messed with a bit in the early hours of the morning. It should be better now. Is the image server getting hammered? - David Gerard 12:17, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Having the same issue as Fastfission here. Or maybe it's just hiding it for my own good, since I'm not at high enough an OT level to see what it looks like. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 21:42, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Dizrythmia

message: I've removed two bits of trivia in the article. They were edited back in the first time I cut them out; I personally don't feel them to be significant or relevant, and one of them was copied word-for-word from the Enzology website. Whomever edited them back in, please reply to this or send me a message if you disagree with the edit.--Theuniversal 02:42, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *I guess it wouldn't be all that great if I just went around vetoing everybody's decisions, so I'll just settle for having the source link in there (already done). Sorry for the minor edit war there.--TheUniversal 00:01, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Harpitanya

message: The Arpitan language exists, but Arpitans don't dominate a swathe of Europe to the exclusion of others as is implied here. CalJW 02:45, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: --> http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arpitanie
84.73.197.132 22:07, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Quote

message: I think there is... RememberMe? 01:56, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cave Story. 81.232.94.183 19:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't there some video game character named Quote? 

message: I have made multiple edits to articles misusing "quote" as a noun.  Quote as a noun is a backformation: a nonexistent word coined from an actual word erroneously supposed to be derived from it as described in Wiktionary and elsewhere. Turkeyphant 14:22, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I’ve reverted a few of your edits. “Quote” (as a noun) is indeed an existent word, even though usage in this context dates back a mere 120 years. While informal, the usage is correct. You’re welcome to debate the proper level of formality on Wikipedia, but don’t go around moving articles of actual, commonly-used terms (e.g. Pull quoteDefinition of "pull quote") without reason. —Down10 TACO 04:04, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotation

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+memorable+quote&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
* http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+memorable+quotes&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.64.223.143 (talk) 07:50, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links maybe associated with the following.....
Talk:Mesosome

message: I notice that this article has been a stub before and has had the stub template removed.  I put it back, in large part because the article could use considerable clarification for a non-scientific audience.  Chick Bowen 02:54, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
This article contradicts itself.  How can mesosomes "play a role in cell wall formation during cell division" if they don't "exist in reality."  Really, that just doesn't make sense how they can both be true --Fastman99 01:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article refers to 'recent' studies and citations are from 1976 and 1981, I wonder whether it is really 'recent' or not
Webster's dictionary says opposite of what this article says.  Here's Webster:  an organelle of bacteria that appears in electron micrographs as an invagination of the plasma membrane and is a site of localization of respiratory enzymes
:Well Webster's is wrong. Read the literature cited in this article. This review is a good source. Tim Vickers (talk) 19:08, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This may be the case but Webster is not the only one stating so. It may be that an error is propagated, and this is why the Wikipedia article needs to be of very high quality. 84.112.136.52 (talk) 21:21, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How recent is 'recent'? 

message: this article Shimoda M, et al. Morphology of defensin-treated Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 1995 Aug;63(8):2886-91.
seems to suggest that mesosomes are not staining artifacts but rather reflect structural changes in the membrane
140.247.240.174 21:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  morphology of defensin treated staph 

message: I am currently reading "Molecular Cell Biology" by Lodish from 2016 (the book). On Page 10 they have "Some bacteria also have an invagination of the cell membrane, called a mesosome, which is associated with synthesis of DNA and secretion of proteins" so the error is still there. Not sure whether anyone wants to mention this in the main article or not, but I found it interesting that an otherwise good book still mentions the mesosome situation. May be interesting to see to which they refer to, if such an error is not corrected. 2A02:8388:1604:F600:A023:1A46:73DC:AD2 (talk) 15:28, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mesosomes still mentioned in books
Talk:Union of Poles in Belarus

message: It helps a lot for adding the link. Is there a Polish noticeboard I can post this too? Zscout370 (Sound Off) 03:20, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Humpty Doo

message: the agricultural area stated was actually in fog dam, not humpty doo, fogg dam is situated about 20km 
east of humpty doo on the edge of the adelaide river floodplains.
:Yes, but it was near the Humpty Doo Station which is where the name Humpty Doo was first used.Bduke 01:57, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it pending verification. Ambi 01:18, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading

message: The article doesn't answer the question that's always uppermost in my mind when thinking of this place, which is of course: Where did the name come from??? Anyone? Lee M 14:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name origins

message: Should there be an item about that? http://triplejawol.typepad.com/awol/humpty_doo.html
Lazybeam 13:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are calling it Humpty Doo, but the concert is at Fred's Pass. It does not seem notable enough to me anyway. It is just a one-off concert. --Bduke 22:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triple J AWOL 

message: What are the people who live here called?--Auric  talk 22:56, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Australians. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:58, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demonym? 
Talk:2004 Roanoke tornado

message: * Atmospheric conditions leading to the formation of supercellular thunderstorm in NW Illinois --Rob 03:51, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: I moved "Roanoke Tornado of 2004" to "2004 Roanoke tornado" to comply with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events). --Rosiestep (talk) 23:41, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Category talk:Jewish-American history

message: This should be renamed to American Jewish History. It is offensive to call Jews Jewish Americans and not American Jews. 
Enough with this politically correct nonsense.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kahanechaivekayam (talk • contribs) 
*Firstly, why are these comments not signed with the four tildes ~~~~ ? Secondly, this category is part of a series that deal with JEWISH history, so it is logical that the category be named "Jewish American history" as are all the others, such as "Jewish Canadian history", "Jewish South African history" etc. See the full list at :Category:Jewish history. Thank you. IZAK 04:33, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming the category

message: This category is both a parent and a child of :Category:Jewish Americans.  It shouldn't be both.  It seems to me that "Jewish Americans" are part of "Jewish American history", so my thinking is that this should be the parent, and "Jewish Americans" should be the child.  Comments? -- MisterHand 21:09, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular hierarchy 

message: The majority of this category is just people who should be placed in the Jewish-American category, but they do not also need to be placed in this category. Unless they aren't Jewish, but were apart of Jewish history, they should be placed in this category. If a person is Jewish, they should only be placed in Jewish-American category and not also Jewish American history category. 75.3.4.54 06:24, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and am working on moving bio articles here to the 'Jewish American' category unless the name is already in one of its subcategories, in which case I am just deleting this category from the article.  It is tedious, you know.  This will make this category consistent with the other 'F00 American history categories'  Thanks Hmains 23:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  People
Talk:Luis Rafael Sánchez

message: I have done some basic editing of this article, including improving prose and correcting names of books listed in scholarship on author section. This article can still be expanded and improved.--Lawrlafo (talk) 02:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just did some further edits.--Lawrlafo (talk) 22:29, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrections
Talk:Sberkassa

message: Mikkalai, could sberknizhka be an equivalent of a passbook? KNewman 04:17, September 10, 2005 (UTC)
:Correct. mikka (t) 15:44, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Is sberknizhk equivalent to a passbook?

message: "Eventually, Soviet sberkassas were outlets of the only Soviet bank, USSR State Bank, or Gosbank until 1988..." Were they ever outlets of Gosbank?  Was Gosbank the "only Soviet Bank"?--Samnikal (talk) 05:18, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gosbank

message: Is there a way to relate this term to the German noun "Sparkasse"? knoodelhed (talk) 18:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  German "Sparkasse"
Talk:Trango Towers

message: There seems to be no clear distinction between two possible meanings of "highest BASE jump", one being "highest starting elevation" and the other being "largest difference between starting and landing elevations." In the first interpretation, the new Meru base jump beats the Trango one. But the second is also interesting, and I can't tell from what I see so far whether the new one beats Trango. -- Spireguy 18:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  BASE Jump 

message: For those of you who are considering looking this place up on google earth:
Don't try.  Their rendition of the area doesn't do the towers nearly enough justice.  Alphabetagamma 03:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True, Google Earth is not based on accurate data for many rugged mountain areas outside the US, and this is one of the most extreme examples. -- Spireguy 03:51, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Google Earth

message: Much as I like Alpinist, this was not an appropriate edit, as Wikipedia is not a collection of links; also see Wikipedia:External links. These could conceivably be included as references for additional content, but not just included as raw links. -- Spireguy 01:55, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted Alpinist Magazine spam 

message: https://www.thebmc.co.uk/korean-everest-sea-to-summit-marred-by-tragedy
of 27/05/2013 says Kim Chang-ho
"is believed to have climbed Trango Tower"
--Helium4 (talk) 00:08, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Fly lure

message: I deleted the external link because it appeared to simply advertise books on fishing, rather than any actual information about lures.  Apologies if I simply missed the content.  --BLP 04:23, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Fehmarn (1644)

message: How can a naval action in 1644 be part of a war that ended in 1570? It looks to me as if this should belong to the Hannibal War. 
Havard 10:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong war
Talk:Action of 14 April 1655

message: * More on the battle
* Its lessons for the Commonwealth's war with Spain
 — LlywelynII 21:23, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion

message: How do you change the title to "Battle of Porto Farina" from the "Action of April 14..." which is the wrong date? Xcerptshow (talk) 03:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  title change
Talk:Battle at The Lizard

message: Seems to be a conflict between the two. Max263 (talk) 17:29, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Battle at' or 'Battle of'?
Talk:Battle of Pirano

message: In case anyone stumbles across this, I will be writing a new version of this article in my userspace and uploading it here once it is ready to compliment my work on Battle of Lissa (1811) an associated action. If any one has any comments, please drop me a line.--Jackyd101 (talk) 11:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its done, some time ago actually.--Jackyd101 (talk) 19:59, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article preparation 

message: The names of the French ships, and the spelling of HMS Weazel, change several times over the course of the battle description. 75.236.250.3 (talk) 22:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent
Talk:Action of 22 January 1794

message: This article glaring does not mention the location of the battle! According to Google books - http://books.google.com/books?id=9CsOAAAAQAAJ&pg=RA1-PA197&lpg=RA1-PA197&ots=WJDKmf14f5&dq=rat+island+basin - the action took place somewhere in the region of the dutch east indies. Perhaps this could be added in...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.160.187 (talk) 22:20, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First comment 

message: I've re-jigged the information in this article to make it easier to follow. I trust that's OK with everyone. Xyl 54 (talk) 01:37, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:First battle of Öland (1564)

message: The summary side bar states swedish losses as 300 and danish as 101 (which seems plausable)but the text says the reverse. The sumary does not mention the damaged ship. The casuialty figures also may not include the first two ships damaged or captured.
The nationality of the first two ship damaged is not clear, are they both Danish?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.31.202.145 (talk) 12:19, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Bornholm (1563)

message: Though Naval Battle is probably more exact.
RhoDaZZ (talk) 09:58, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that. Imonoz (talk) 22:15, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be called "Battle of Bornholm (1563)"
Talk:Action of 3 July 1810

message: __TOC__
As a courtesy I am leaving a notice that I am preparing a new, expanded and sourced version of this article in my Userspace and it should be pasted up here in about a week. If anyone has any comment then by all means drop me a line.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:05, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's ready and imported. see User:jackyd101/Action of 3 July 1810 if anyone needsd the history of the article as I created it.--Jackyd101 (talk) 14:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Action of 29 November 1811

message: In case anyone stumbles across this, I will be writing a full version of this article in my userspace and uploading it here once it is ready to compliment my work on Battle of Lissa (1811) an associated action.--Jackyd101 (talk) 16:52, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is now uploaded here.--Jackyd101 (talk) 11:12, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article preparation
Talk:Action of 25 September 1806

message: As a courtesy I am leaving a notice that I am preparing a new, expanded and sourced version of this article in my Userspace. It should be pasted up here in a week or two. If anyone has any comments then by all means drop me a line.--Jackyd101 (talk) 00:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The new page is now up and ready (and quicker than I expected!). If any one needs to see the edits I made in creating it then they can be found in the history of the redirect User:Jackyd101/Action of 25 September 1806. Enjoy.--Jackyd101 (talk) 22:23, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: Shouldn't the WikiProject British be added to the WikiProjects as well since the WikiProject French have one?  Adamdaley (talk) 02:37, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like a good idea to me, so I've gone ahead and done that now. Cheers. Anotherclown (talk) 10:43, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject British
Talk:Battle of Hogland (1713)

message: I'm curious, in the picture displaying the battle, one can see two Russian ships either sinking or burning. However, in the casualty bar only one is mentioned. There's also a written text in Swedish up-left which says (roughly translated): A Swedish detachment of three ships commanded by Carl Raab and Captain Kjörning and S. I. Wrangel fought 13 Russian ships which were hunting them with cannon fire, when 2 Russian ships were lost and the Swedish ships luckily escaped. So, judging from this 2 Russian ships were lost. Any thoughts? Imonoz (talk) 18:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure. Mattila is quite clear that only one Russian ship would have been lost. There are some issues with the sources as to which ship exactly was lost, Swedes claim it was the Russian flagship Moskva but in this occasion it would seem to be better to trust the Russian information that it was Vyborg. Given that there are two different names for the ship that was lost it might not be inconceivable to assume that the Swedish artist then chose to draw both of them as Russian losses. Of three Russian ships that run aground the two survivors lost their heavy guns as they had to lighten the ships by throwing cannons overboard to get the ships loose from the rocks. - Wanderer602 (talk) 20:27, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds reasonable, thanks for clearing that up. Imonoz (talk) 22:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties