Talk:Evidentiality

message: I just removed the cleanup tag. As I take it, the article does a good job at explaining and detailing the complex linguistic subject of evidentiality. As any article, it could be improved still, but it is definitely not in the league of articles needing cleanup. — mark ✎ 10:18, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaup removed 

message: Are the French terms in the introduction, with accents and all, really necessary? Unless they are actually used in English, they should be removed, as this is the English wikipedia, and this article has no strong ties to French.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.166.150.53 (talk) 08:10, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  French terms 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Evidentiality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060917025820/http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/cumming/ling50/evidentiality.htm to http://www.linguistics.ucsb.edu/faculty/cumming/ling50/evidentiality.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605015907/http://www.u.arizona.edu/~fdehaan/papers/ to http://www.u.arizona.edu/~fdehaan/papers/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080906163946/http://www.u.arizona.edu/~fdehaan/papers/evidbib.html to http://www.u.arizona.edu/~fdehaan/papers/evidbib.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926151704/http://www.u.arizona.edu/~fdehaan/papers/evidsem.jpg to http://www.u.arizona.edu/~fdehaan/papers/evidsem.jpg
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050529042033/http://www.faculty.uaf.edu/ffgmh1/docs/den-evid.pdf to http://www.faculty.uaf.edu/ffgmh1/docs/den-evid.pdf
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130112230102/http://cf.linguistlist.org/cfdocs/new-website/LL-WorkingDirs/pubs/reviews/get-review.cfm?SubID=12044 to http://cf.linguistlist.org/cfdocs/new-website/LL-WorkingDirs/pubs/reviews/get-review.cfm?SubID=12044
*Added  tag to http://cf.linguistlist.org/cfdocs/new-website/LL-WorkingDirs/pubs/reviews/get-review.cfm?SubID=59434
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:35, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Isn't this (Konjunktiv I) an example of this?  I can see subjunctive two being a grammatical mood instead (hypothetical, wishful, etc), but using subjunctive one indicates the speaker is referring someone else, using indirect speech.  The speaker is not stating his own opinion or expressing his own beliefs, merely referring someone else's.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ketil (talk • contribs) 09:42, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subjunctive I in German 

message: I have no idea what the first half of this sentence is intended to mean:
Evidential is a meaning of nature and statement that is whether evidence exists for the statement and what kind of evidence exists.
:Good point. I have removed that sentence. It's just repeating the opening sentence. Bondegezou (talk) 08:50, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awkward sentence in intro