lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Catriona (novel)

message: Please note that this article's infobox is retrieving an ISBN from Wikidata currently. This is the result of a change made to  as a result of  this RfC. It would be appreciated if an editor took some time to review this ISBN to ensure it is appropriate for the infobox. If it is not, you could consider either correcting the ISBN on Wikidata (preferred) or introducing a blank ISBN parameter in the infobox to block the retrieval from Wikidata. If you do review the ISBN, please respond here so other editors don't duplicate your work. This is an automated message to address concerns that this change did not show up on watchlists. ~ RobTalk 01:20, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of ISBN from Wikidata
Category talk:English football squad navigational boxes

message: Just a quick question: why are managers included in squad templates (unless they are player-managers)?--Vivenot 16:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Managers in squad templates

message: why are the leiceter players showing in the lists on the article page?Skitzo 12:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leicester players
Template talk:Brentford F.C. squad

message: I notice the Brentford F.C. squad template has been amended to include Leroy Rosenior. Just a quick question: why are managers included in squad templates? As far as I am aware, Leroy isn't a player-manager.--Vivenot 16:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rosenior in squad template
Talk:Prehistory of Alaska

message: How much of this article is prehistory, and how much is modern history or anthropology?
The first two paragraphs deal with migrations from 10,000 years ago, while the subsequent paragraphs talk about the culture, beliefs and lifestyle of the Alaskan peoples. Presumably the latter describes them in the last few centuries, and thus part of written history. If it is meant to describe the Alaskan cultures thousands of years ago, surely this is speculation, or some kind of archaeological evidence should be mentioned.
Either way, some cites would be good.
Chris Thornett 16:40, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The migrations in Alaska did not occur between 60,000 and 50,000 years ago. When I try to view the source, Google lists it as a malicious site.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.25.132.120 (talk) 03:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense
Talk:Hoosh

message: If you read Alfred Lansing's "Endurance: Shackleton's Incredible Voyage", you will read that they ate alot of hoosh.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.130.90.252 (talk) 01:19, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Endurance: Shakleton's Increditable Voyage
Talk:Museum of Sex

message: Museum of sex has a new project at mosexindex.com: this should be documented here?
Do you really need both the first two photographs? I don't see what the second adds to the first. I'll remove it, if you have a problem please reply 86.144.145.103 (talk) 16:40, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Kaj Munk

message: Although I heard about Kaj Munk when I lived in Silkeborg for a few months long ago, I didn't remember he was a priest. According to google maps, his Gothic stone parish church in Western Denmark still exists, with a postal address of Vesterhavsvej 70, 6990 Ulfborg, Denmark. However, apparently the parish itself was so small (probably except in summers and Munk was murdered in January near the Nazi army HQ in Silkeborg) or the building sold for other uses, that it doesn't figure in the modern county/municipal reorganization, nor is it among the churches listed on the current website for the current and very geographically large Holstebro Kommune.Jweaver28 (talk) 13:32, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Vanaja (Finland)

message: Could it be that the article is a hoax? There are no reliable sources. I have found no data about the site on Google Books, which contains many books about the Vikings. Furthermore, the Cambridge Medieval History estimates the size of Birka at 14 hectares. All this makes me wonder... --Ghirla -трёп- 17:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Article is not a hoax. Finland was not a Viking land, and Finland is usually omitted from Viking articles. Recent Nordic publications about the Scandinavian Iron Age have started to include Vanaja as a contemporary commercial center, though. Excavations were undertaken in the late 1980s by Hans-Peter Schultz, and the results have been properly published in detail. However, like stated in the article, the nature of the site has been contested, and hopefully gets resolved when there eventually surfaces enough funding to finalize the excavations. About the size of Birka, Cambridge seems to have included the large cemetaries outside the city. --Drieakko 19:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Added reference to the publication going through the excavation results in detail. The articles are some 60 pages and written in German. --Drieakko 19:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax? 

message: This is a persistent error in most sources. The church has actually never been on an island. The water level around the cape has not been high enough to make it an island, not even before 1860, when water level in the nearby Vanaja-lake was 2 meters higher than to-day (At that time the water level in the basin was permanently sunk). I have checked over 20 old maps between the years 1600 and 1860. There is no indication whatsoever in any of them that the church had been surrounded by water. 
As for the first Swedish mention of the name Vanö (in 1329), in that period the water level in the nearby Vanaja-lake was at least half a meter lower than in 1859 (due to post-glacial-age land rising which slowly elevates the NE-end of the big lake basin pushing the water towards the SE-end, i.e at Vanaja).
Before the present water course regulation started in 1955, spring floods were frequent and high. In some years before 1860 water did rise high enough to surround the site of the church making it a temporary ' island'.
Alcofribas 20:40, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''in a former island ..''
Talk:The Children's Hour (film)

message: Why is that long paragraph criticizing the film not balanced by a long paragraph of critics who liked/admired it?  Seems a little off.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.110.224.43 (talk) 23:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception Section 

message: "When Martha learns about the break-up, she confesses she always had felt more than friendship for Karen and, upon hearing the false accusation, she finally realized she loves her."
Okay, this is a little too timid. Martha doesn't just realize she loves Karen, she completely breaks down, dissolving in the most heartbreaking case of self-loathing I've ever seen on screen. Wouldn't some stronger wording be in order? Martha says:
"I feel so damned sick and dirty I can't stand myself!"
A whole generation of gays and lesbians saw this film and understood what she was talking about. Doesn't it merit mentioning here? Jfulbright (talk) 20:35, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The confession
Talk:Give It Up, Turn It Loose

message: This song contains an interpolation of the song "Yesterday" by the Beatles: "I believe in yesterday" is sung with the same melody of the original. 12.162.122.5 (talk) 18:28, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Yesterday
Talk:Too Gone, Too Long

message: Diane Warren has a tendency to file copyright before presenting any of her composed songs to artists to record. Britney Spears recorded a song When Your Eyes Say It, on January 28, 2000 at Battery Studios, following a copyright by Warren on the song dated December 6, 1999. The song was released on May 16, 2000. Toni Braxton in the fall of 1995, recorded Un-break My Heart. Warren filed for copyright on September 12, 1995. It was released on June 18, 1996. This song was recorded after copyright on December 16, 1996 by Diane Warren, by En Vogue as a quartet in January 1997. Changes were made during new sessions in May 1997 to replace Dawn Robinson's vocals, following her late April 1997 departure.--Carmaker1 (talk) 10:37, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording Date
Talk:Spinal Stenosis information and treatments

message: Hello, I am the administrator for the Laser spine institute, the very website that you say I have copyright infringements. 
You can contact me via email pfoote@laserspineinstitute.com or by phone 813-289-9613
thank you,
Patrick Foote
:I have e-mailed Foote to confirm the ownership of the content per Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Either way the content is raw and unformatted and should be merged into Spinal stenosis. BrokenSegue 21:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He has not responded. It should probably stay a redirect in any case. BrokenSegue 04:31, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Red crossbill

message: Is this bird the same as the Japanese Isuka? The question comes from reading a list of names of enemy fighters in "Ikaruga", which are apparently all based on bird names. According to an article on birds on japanese stamps, this bird is what is known as the 'Isuka'- can anyone verify/clarify this? 204.153.78.195 18:54, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isuka
Talk:Scottish crossbill

message: Assuming the filename is correct, this is actually a picture of the Parrot Crossbill (Loxia pytyopsittacus) rather than the Scottish Crossbill (L. scotica). Flapdragon 14:32, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And Scottish Crossbill doesn't occur in central Europe, but Scottish is often considered to be a subspecies of Parrot Crossbill.... Jimfbleak 14:50, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I disagree with this view. People can find the parrot crossbill picture by following the appropriate link if they need to. We don't use "similar" images in other articles. At the very least, you'd have to adjust the caption in image namespace to point out which species is being shown, and what its relation is to any other species that may allow it to be used in other articles. Finally, I might add that I think the rationale you have just offered is similar to what we use for fair use. Fair use would not apply in this case, because a free image could be obtained. Similarly, we should not be so lazy to include an incorrect image rather than work hard to obtain permission to use an accurate one. Samsara (talk • contribs) 13:53, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added an image caption. I believe there are two issues of significance here. The first is whether or not the image is misleading. As the only significant visual clue that distinguishes the Scottish from the Parrot and Common is a relatively small variation in bill size, I can't imagine that anyone except the most seasoned  watcher might be misled. Hopefully the caption now avoids even that possibility.  The second issue is availability of images. The bird is ( I believe) the rarest resident European bird. There are few Commons  images of any Scottish creature on its native heath and I suspect obtaining one might not be easy. If you are motivated to find one that's terrific, but in the meantime it is my view that an all-but-indistinguishable one from the real thing is better than nothing. Ben MacDuiTalk/Walk 20:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong picture?
Talk:All India Democratic Students Organisation

message: Dear Wiki Editors,
I provided with some more time, the document will be made suitable to Wiki style.
Regards
Sekhar
:Wikipedia is not a place which any party secretary or his spoilt son can vitiate and put fanciful crap in. Kuntan 18:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I have just added an image in the article. I can see there are lots of unreferenced information in the article. I'll try to work on them. Thanks! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 11:05, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk Page Update 

message: এই পেজটাকে কেউ বাংলায় অনুবাদ করে দাও হে। Joysriramsarkar.manathetiger56 (talk) 06:43, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  অনুবাদ
Talk:Taken at the Flood

message: The Labours of Hercules was published in 1947, between the publication of The Hollow and Taken at the Flood. Because this book of short stories comprised material published previously, I have omitted it from the series in the infobox. --Sordel 17:22, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The sequence of the Poirot novels

message: I do not believe that the TV adaptation for ITV (with David Suchet) resets the action into the 1930s. Costumes etc. as well as a possible reference to World War II suggests it is late 1940s or early 1950s. 71.36.157.148 (talk) 19:32, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1930s? 

message: In the plot, the article mentions that "After the Prelude, the novel flashes back from late Spring to early Spring,... ". But the prelude is late spring 1944 and the part after that is early spring 1946. So there is no question of "flashing back". I think it should be changed. 117.194.227.83 (talk) 11:07, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That text is removed now, it was very confusing, . The events of 1944 are now under the title Plot introduction, mainly from the Prologue.  --Prairieplant (talk) 09:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)

text: Although the first half of the prologue takes place in autumn (not spring) of 1944, it then jumps ahead to late spring 1946 when Katherine Cloade (guided by spirits) comes to visit Poirot in an attempt to track down Rosaleen's first husband, and then five days later when Poirot reads about the death of Enoch Arden in the newspaper, causing him to muse "I wonder what has been going on in Warmsley Vale." This ends the prologue, and the main part of the book then jumps back by a few weeks to recount what has been going on in Warmsley Vale and the events leading up to "Arden's" death. The second half of the prologue is currently omitted from the plot summary, which is fair enough. —Snarkibartfast (talk) 08:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flashback? 
Talk:Kampfar

message: NOTE: Much of this article was written with the help of II13, one of the things the emphasized is that Kampfar is NOT a VIKING METAL band Diego Torquemada 23:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Much of the "History" section sounds like an advertisement and not like an encyclopedic article. There are tons of marketing speech in it and quite little facts. Also, the name of the band shouldn't be capitalized in the article. It's not an acronym. 79.245.170.94 (talk) 00:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 
Talk:Mazel tov

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was page renamed. Mazel tov on reaching consensus after only three days! —harej (talk) (cool!) 00:57, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Mazal tov → Mazel tov — This page should be moved back to "mazel tov", it is the most common English spelling (Per WP:USEENGLISH), "mazel tov" is found in the dictionary as the primary entry (and the only entry in Merriam-Webster  here), whereas "mazal tov" is either not found, or is found as a spelling varient. In addition, it beats 2:1 in Google test. - Epson291 (talk) 15:57, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Just as a note, "mazel" is Yiddish, "mazal" is Hebrew" (ancient as well as contemporary). Debresser (talk) 01:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: dont get me wrong boys
but the whole article stinks
its not even clear wether maseltov is good or bad
no sources, nothing  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.104.108.244 (talk) 00:37, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Drive by critic

message: While it's probably correct that this is a well known Yiddish phrase, I've tagged this up as deducing that from a mention in a Black Eyed Peas video borders on WP:OR/WP:SYNTH -- 146.115.187.103 (talk) 02:27, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using the Black Eyed Peas as a ref? 

message: I always thought Mazel Tov had a slightly different connotation, that you were acknowledging someone for a good deed.  So not just a congratulation, but more a compliment for doing something worthwhile, for being a mensch.  Or am I mixing it up with a different phrase?  146.137.70.70 (talk) 14:35, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You are mistaken. Debresser (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not so sure. Mazel tov is pretty similar to mazette!, which is a surprise exclamation when someone does a memorable, improbable hat trick.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB11:13:D700:88BD:FDE9:7977:78D3 (talk) 01:17, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compliment
Talk:Yoko Kamio

message: There is nothing wrong with the trivia, is not inapropiate so I put it back where it was.Angel,Isaac 19:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it is contrary to the manual of style as per Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles. -- Whpq 19:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Removed a part of the 'After HYD' section. It was a description of Cat Street, which can be found in it's own article, and was pretty much copied from this page and only slightly altered. Ninja neko 21:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  After HYD 
Talk:Pillbox

message: Pill Box is an Italian free press magazine. It deals with news and leasure time. The chief editor is Mauro Pecchenino the only Italian to win the European Communicator Award(2004).
The Publisher of the magazine is Equam snc di Enrico Quaroni e Antonio Marini.
:Is there an article about one of these that the entry could link to? --82.36.30.173 (talk) 03:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italian magazine
Talk:Junkers W 34

message: Added and linked to detail on Chaco War. Fluffy999 14:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chaco War

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:49, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Also this aircraft was used by Romanian Kingdom in,as from 1939 1940 for transport within Romanian Royal Air Force..here i must see xact,.hereh i must see exact,,also during the Romanian Campaign at Stalingrad from 22nd June 1941 to 23rd of August 1944.2003:CF:BBCA:941A:B88F:635E:D5D6:469D (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2018.Please see to it changes are made.Thank You. (UTC)AristiderazuAristiderazu (talk) 14:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Romanian Kingdom 

message: Greater Romania Campaign over Stalingrad 1941-1943
.......................
Preparations
Source, Ministerul Fortelor Aerului R56 02478 BIBLOTECA 11.834/4, hence ,public domain,Library of Air Ministry of Romania, books?Aristiderazu (talk) 10:52, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greater Romania Campaign over Stalingrad 1941-1943 Junkers-34
Talk:Angola colobus

message: Punetor i Rregullt5 (talk) 19:23, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

message: Peters's Angola colobus should be merged into Angola colobus. It is a non-notable subspecies; the article has little information; of the article's two references, one is for the Angola colobus and the other is a YouTube video; the image isn't necessarily of the correct subspecies; and the content is either a duplicate of the Angola colobus article or would merge into it easily. Jack (talk) 16:13, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Icknield High School

message: Can we have a photo of the school or it's badge?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.29.145.46 (talk) 23:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos?

message: This article was de-prodded as notable? In what way? There is nothing in the article that shows how it is notable. Mapetite526 17:59, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?

message: I am putting this here because I don't know how to make it more of a wiki layout.
Each tutor group is formulated from 
*The tie colour
*Band A or Band B
*One of the letters C, A, R, E, or S.
For example:
A year 7 (green tie) in band A allotted the letter C would be GAC.
C stands for Celebrate (our uniqueness)
A stands for Achieve (our potential to succeed)
R stands for Respect (ourselves, our society and our environment)
E stands for Enjoy (our opportunities to learn)
S stands for Support (our community and its needs)
Cheesypot 21:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Icknield Cares 

message: I don't understand: RJFJR (talk) 21:05, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarify
Talk:Dirk (play)

message: Entry has been flagged for deletion on first creation because of concern High School Play. I'm not quite sure what this means. If it means it is not worthy of inclusion because it is "only" a school play, it may have started that way but is now performed professionally and is a valid adaptation of Douglas Adams's work that is referenced in all of his biographies (to which I will make reference in further edits)Gusty42 18:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Thomas Love Peacock

message: Is the illiterate bit about the deodorant true?  Meanwhile, I shall attempt to improve it.Rothorpe 22:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Peacock's own place in literature is pre-eminently that of a satirist. That he has nevertheless been the favourite only of the few is owing partly to the highly intellectual quality of his work, but mainly to his lack of ordinary qualifications of the novelist, all pretension to which he entirely disclaims. He has no plot, little human interest, and no consistent delineation of character. His personages are mere puppets, or, at best, incarnations of abstract qualities such as grace or beauty.
His comedy is Aristophanic. He suffers from that dramatist's faults and, though not as daring in invention, shares many of his strengths."
OK, who wrote that massively POV passage? It has no place in a Wikipedia article. Even if it were entirely fair to Peacock (which I don't think it is), it would still belong in the realm of opinion. It badly needs fixing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.189.81.245 (talk) 15:12, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was someone called "richard garnett". I don't think he properly understood the principles of Wikipedia contribution, but then, he did write it in 1891. I edited the essay down to a reasonable size and added it, but I didn't feel up to re-writing... Hxa7241 (talk) 21:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Instead of joking about it and talking about irrelevant paraphrasing, source it for starters. Otherwise, delete the nonsense. It's been a half-decade. Jtcarpet (talk) 00:19, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: I have the collected Novels of Thomas Love Peacock, published in London in 1963. The introduction, by David Garnett, has a slightly different version of this poem:
:From ten to eleven, ate a breakfast for seven;
:From eleven to noon, to begin 'twas too soon;
:From twelve to one, asked "What's to be done?"
:From one to two, found nothing to do;
:From two to three began to foresee
:That from three to four would be a damned bore.
This version appears to scan better than the version currently in the article, which is not sourced. Does anyone know where it is from? If there are no objections in the next few days, I propose to substitute this sourced version. RolandR (talk) 14:49, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  India House poem
Talk:Alfa Romeo BAT

message: I photographed 5 7 and 9 in an auto museum in Las Vegas, Nevada in 2009, so they could have not been in Danville, CA during that time
PHOTOS (feel free to use these):
BAT 7 - Front
BAT 7 WINGS
BAT 9 - FRONT
BAT 9 - BACKBAT 5 - FRONT
No back photos of BAT 5, sorry!
Submitted by britenour73--98.97.23.30 (talk) 13:05, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location info