lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Interstate 37

message: Can someone please fix the plethora -- yes, I did use that word -- of dead link in the article?
Thanks!
Allen (talk) 01:48, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links 

message: I was a student when all this originally happened, but the original plan for I-37 was for it to continue through north central SA.  Environmentalists were successful at stopping this work for some time and eventually, to get around the federal entanglements, the state built the 281 extension through Brackenridge and Olmos Parks.   Someone who has a better memory of this (or who can provide cites, which I cannot) might want to expand the article to include this.  99.191.106.234 (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interstate 37 stopping at I-35 due to environmental concerns 
Talk:Asa Fitch

message: Changed some spacing and a typo, added some wiki links. Marbahlarbs 23:48, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes by Marbahlarbs
Talk:Scandinavian Mountains

message: Is this really the English name for these mountains? I've never ever seen anything else than Kjølen been used in Norway. Fornadan (t) 23:49, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Try Googling - lots of scholarly books and papers use it for instance. Stan 00:04, 1 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Kölen is rather old-fashioned in Swedish too. I have never heard anyone saying "We're off to the middle Keel for the holidays" - it's not really used in speech, nor by STF (the Swedish Tourism Association), weather forecasters, news media or SJ, the public railways company which takes hundreds of thousands of Swedish and foreign tourists up there every year - it's really only found in (older) books. Everyone says fjällen. /Strausszek (talk) 11:19, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: English literary and historical references are to "the Keel", but as noted above referring only to the range forming the Swedish-Norwegian boundary, and not to Dovrefjell/Jotunheimen/Hardangervidda/Haukelifjell.  I wound up here after seeing this name on the Jotunheimen article and, not having seen the name before, came to see what reference it has; it has none, apparently.  And in local perspective it's not a single range, obviously (since there's no collective name for it and despite its common orogeny).  My immediate reaction to this is that this page should not be titled as it is, but instead should be Mountains of Scandinavia and/or [[Mountain ranges of Scandinavia].  It is not one range, and does not have a common name, referenced or otherwise, so should not be titled and treated as though it did.Skookum1 (talk) 03:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the Mountain Range

message: The Caledonian orogeny was 400 million years ago. These mountains were eroded away with normal speed, and the Scandinavian Peninsula was a plain during the Mesozoic, partly flooded by the ocean. The Scandinavian Mountains of today were formed in Paleogene and Neogene. However, they do contain rocks from The Caledonian orogeny, but also much older rock. Trurl1 (talk) 21:20, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of the mountain chain 

message: No information about the surface of the Scandinavian Mountains. WorldCitizen333 (talk) 11:49, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area 

message: This sentence should presumable be changed I guess? "The mountains are relatively high for a range so young and are very steep in places". Mountains tend to wear down over time so this should be "so old" right? 94.255.243.101 (talk) 14:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old or young?
Talk:Confessions of an Economic Hit Man

message: Wikipedia is neither a mirror nor a repository of links, images, or media files.  Wikipedia articles are not: Mere collections of external links or Internet directories.  This ridiculously long list of links that provide nothing to the article except as a list of links simply doesn't meet our guidelines, and that's even before looking at many of the individual links to self-published sources and blogs.  It needs to go. Thargor Orlando (talk) 00:59, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no objection to trimming the list. But I think links such as one with an interview of the author about this book seem well worth including. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:57, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: So why aren't they used as references if they're so important?  Which ones do you think are worth keeping? Thargor Orlando (talk) 11:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

text: Any further commentary on this? Thargor Orlando (talk) 17:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long indiscriminate lists 

message: Just to point out that the whole 'response' section has only one source which is a blog review! Since this author is widely characterised as a conspiracy theorist, does a blog review meet standards?Pincrete (talk) 18:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blog review in response section 

message: So I am a bit late with this, but I just finished the book today. Although I am a bit sceptic about some of the claims made in this book, and from time to time I think the author over simplifies and only present one perspective, I think there were some interesting points made. I am a strong believer in freedom of speech, any idea can be discussed and so on. Currently book isn't presented in a neutral way and is almost instantly disregarded as nonsense. I think it is better to present it in a fair way and then let it be criticized. Does anyone disagree? --Immunmotbluescreen (talk) 12:04, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia  is meant to present the general consensus of knowledge on a topic at the current time. The general consensus at the current moment is that it has major flaws in accuracy. JSory (talk) 01:00, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extreme bias on this page 
Talk:Zionist youth movement

message: i would like to add a link to http://www.bneionline.com/ the online source for madrichim.
thanks Samson Ben-Manoach (talk) 23:40, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Link to Sources for Madrichim 
Talk:José dos Santos Ferreira

message: I have deleted the proposal for deletion tag placed on this page by User:Oo7565. 
I admit that the article is skimpy and does not give sufficient sources. These are both glaring faults with the article.
However, the grounds given for deletion are WP:Bio -- that is, lack of notability -- not lack of sources or poor writing.
José dos Santos Ferreira may not be well known in the halls of Hollywood or other bastions of Western entertainment or culture. To say that he is "non-notable", however, is quite clearly a misapprehension. The man has a statue erected to him in a public place in the Macau SAR. It is difficult to see that there is a prima facie case for deletion of a biography when the person in question is notable enough to have a statue erected in a public place. Ade may have been writing in a language that is not very well known and is probably dying, in a territory that does not make a very big splash in the Western world. He is, however, an important symbol of a cultural tradition in Macau, and for those who care about Macau's culture and history, his memory is worth keeping alive.
It is for this reason that I have deleted the proposal for deletion tag.
Bathrobe (talk) 06:00, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Template talk:Non-free book cover

message: Please fix "Other use of this image" to "Any other uses of this image"? LucasKannou (talk) 16:26, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 18:26, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 5 March 2022 

message: Description of suggested change:
Change "non-free use" to "fair use" for consistency with the other templates (e.g. :Template:Non-free board game cover).
Diff:
Sobsz (talk) 21:26, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 22:34, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 26 November 2022
Talk:12th United States Congress

message: *This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
*suggestions for future improvements:
#supplemental Senate & House committees article
#supplemental district maps article
#narrative for major legislation
#narrative for major events
stilltim 01:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Changed Asa Fitch to Asa Fitch (Representative) in order to seperate politician and entomologist. Marbahlarbs 00:42, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits by Marbahlarbs
Talk:City region

message: How can this be true?!
:but rejected in a referendum by voters in November 2005
Silverhelm 00:42, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: West Lothian Question

message: "Also in 2006, the OECD published a number of studies on city regions, including an assessment profile of the Newcastle-Gateshead city region and a review of numerous city regions across the world [1]."
In the linked article, the term 'city region' doesn't appear even once. Haskanik (talk) 12:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: OECD studies
Talk:Citybus (Hong Kong)

message: Hello. I have some comments on this articles (may be as well as the articles for NWFB and KMB).
I think the articles has placed too much emphasis on some facts, i.e. the routes! The routes as become the major part of the article. However I think this is quite redundant as it can be found here with accurate and updated information.(sorry for those who worked hard on this table). But I really think that wikipedia should not focus on such facts, which wastes time on updating. Instead, I think we should pay more focus on the history (esp. those not listed on the official homepage), the factors of Citybus's subccess, how Citybus leads in the evolution of bus industry, etc. I think these should be what an encyclopedia should contain.
What do you think? -- Spring Dennis 10:50, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some suggestions on the stucture and content 
Talk:Borsalino

message: I have tried to further rewrite the Borsalino article at Borsalino/Temp so that it is not breaching any copyright problems. Yes, the original submission still followed the original source too closely. I am working on that. I have reduced the article to the bare facts in more of my own wording. I should have done that before submission, but I intended to work with it more later. SF2K1 00:57, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. The borsalino hats were founded through "Lapin", aka Rabbit, fur. They later expanded their top of the line hats to utilize beavers (I have no idea why yet), leaving rabbit as the "standard" and felt or faux fur for the cheap hats. SF2K1
The article in English appears to be a machine translation from another language (Italian?). "Employments" for example instead of "employees". Whole sentences are incomprehensible presumably because the wrong words have been used in the translation.Milesnfowler (talk) 12:50, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Jewish Lubavitcher sectarians wear the Borsalino hats in black color, which started after their Rebbe Menachem Shneerson abolished wearing of Hasidic hats, shtreimels, etc. --Autismal (talk) 03:54, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well actually it's more of the black hat of choice for the black hat wearing Jews which is not just Chabad, also all of the Litvaks, and Heimish Jews as well.Saxophonemn (talk) 06:38, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jews
Talk:French ironclad Gloire

message: This article states: "However La Gloire was soon herself rendered obsolete by the launching in 1860 of the British HMS Warrior, the world's first iron-hulled warship." Of course, the first USS Michigan was actually the world's first iron-hulled warship, launched in 1843 and commissioned in 1844, well over a decade before either La Gloire or Warrior. The description of La Gloire is correct in that she was the first "ocean-going" ironclad, but sorry, Warrior was not the first iron-hulled warship, perhaps if you added the qualificatino "ocean-going" then you'd be accurate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.51.66.32 (talk) 15:45, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorry

message: Since she was in the French fleet during the Franco Prussian war, it would be good to see a sentence or two to cover her role in that war. ϢereSpielChequers 11:51, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Service history -  Wartime

message: An image of la Couronne (as modified to a gunnery school ship) is included in the gallery. I feel that it doesn't belong here, but what do others think?
Couronne was not a half-sister or "near-sister" to Gloire, being of a different form and construction as designed and completed. Furthermore, she has her own article. Considering that the Gloire and sisters were never converted for school ship use (nor were the later and much more similar Provence-class ships) I feel that the image adds nothing to this article. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:49C5:967A:1826:AC3B (talk) 16:52, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image gallery
Talk:Laestrygonians

message: In Greek, Laos means "People".  So, Laes-trygonians means "People of Trygonia".  And, "Trygonia" is very similar in sound to Trinakia, the ancient Greek name of Sicily (a three (tri-) cornered (nakia?) island).  Indeed, the Laestrygonians threw rocks at Odysseus' ships, just like Polyphemos.  There seems to be some reduplication -- first, Odysseus faces the Cyclops (of Sicily), and goes to Aeolus' island; next, Odysseus goes to Aeolus' island (again), and then faces the Laestrygonians (of Sicily, again).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.143.68.244 (talk) 01:14, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

message: A question.
Is possible that Telepylos, capital of Laestrygones may be Pre-Phoenician Carthage? --IonnKorr 18:33, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laestrygones and Carthage 

message: The Northern Sardinian tribe with the closest linguistic tie to Laestrygonians (the Lestrigoni) were said to be located close to the lost city of Tibula. This seems to be etymologically close to Telepylos (distant port)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.150.182.2 (talk) 19:30, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tibula 

message: The article says all of Odysseus' men survived the attack (perhaps referring to the boulders thrown at the ships). But even with the restriction, the assertion is false. 
Lines 132-136
“Down from the cliffs they flung great rocks a man could hardly hoist
     and a ghastly shattering din rose up from all the ships —
     men in their death-cries, hulls smashed to splinters —
     They speared the crews like fish
     and whisked them home to make their grisly meal.” Homer & Robert Fagles. “The Odyssey.” Penguin Books, 1996. iBooks. 
ZacharyFoj (talk) 16:48, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some of Odysseus' men were killed.
Talk:Boxing (computer science)

message: int i = 9;
int j = 13;
int k = i + j;
This is done all in a primitive type. Shouldn't the first line, for example, be "Integer i = 9"? -- Taku 01:24, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
This article doesn't say much about what an object type is. It's trying to explain autoboxing, but not doing a very good job. I'd rather read the Sun article. Can anyone do a better job? --Uncle Ed 21:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Unboxing redirects here, but this is about how objects work in Java. It doesn't seem to be a suitable place to put something about unboxed types in Haskell, although there is similarity in the underlying concepts. In Haskell everything by default is 'boxed', and a boxed thing could be either the thing itself or some unevaluated expression that could evaluate to something of the correct type (because Haskell is lazy).  Furby100 (talk) 21:15, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Haskell (programming language)|Haskell]]  unboxing 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved per request.  Favonian (talk) 20:46, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Object type (object-oriented programming) →  – The current title is just terrible, it is nowhere in the article and has no sources using the term. Looking at incoming links they are either from the data types template under "related topics", or to the sections boxing or autoboxing. Looking at  the redirect Boxing (computer science) gets 62 pageviews by itself compared to the this page's 250, out of a total 406. Boxing adequately describes the article; unboxing and autoboxing are derived terms so in the interest of concision do not need to be in the title. Mathnerd314159 (talk) 21:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 August 2022
Talk:Sequential game

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Gioco dinamico and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 12#Gioco dinamico until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ~~~~User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 02:11, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Gioco dinamico" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Strategyproofness

message: Reference 2 ("Group Strategy-proofness And Social Choice Between Two Alternatives" (PDF).) does not go anywhere valid.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.103.29.73 (talk) 19:32, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

message: I've just reverted a change which turned the instances of strategyproof to strategy-proof in the article. I believe that is inappropriate if the title is strategyproof and that is the common name.
The question is though, is strategyproof the common name or should the article really be entitled strategy-proof? Dmcq (talk) 11:13, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Google-Ngrams suggests both are used, with strategy-proof slightly ahead but not by much. 17:59, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to strategy-proof? 

message: The first sentence introduces strategyproofness as a property of asymmetric games, but the term is later defined as a property of "mechanisms". It is not clear whether this is really equivalent. The introduction also uses the term "private information", but the definition given in the "Notation" section does not mention anything about truthfulness or information. The article needs to be more clear and consistent in these regards. Keinfehler (talk) 15:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different definitions in introduction and Notation section
Talk:Super City (toy)

message: Hi. I'm a new happy wikipedian :-)
I just created my first article (Super City) and I noticed that when I saved the article, I was no more logged in.
So I don't have the credit for the creation of the article, only for the addition of the picture done later.
Please can you tell me how this article can be added to my contributions ?
Thank you
Jonathan Métillon
comments 
Whats this comment about it being impossible for small fingers to use? I had one and I never had any problems. Built all types of buildings. Is that a company quote from Ideal if not it should be removed.
--Sattmaster (talk) 05:12, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Get back credit for the article creation
Talk:Subgame

message: Isn't criterion 2 redundant? Johnnyaug (talk) 19:47, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, let me just fix this --User:Mathmon   — Preceding undated comment added 09:49, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Subgame 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Sottogioco and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 12#Sottogioco until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ~~~~User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 02:15, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sottogioco" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Subgame perfect equilibrium

message: The second sentence says "A strategy set is a subgame perfect equilibrium if (...)", and "strategy set" is a link to the "strategy" page. However, that page does not define anything called "strategy set". Instead, it defines a "strategy profile", which I *think* is what is meant here. I won't change it, though, because I'm not 100% sure that this is the right correction. Hopefully someone more knowledgeable will read this?
Yes, that is correct.  Have updated. 129.67.98.222 18:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I think different wording should be used instead of "Wheel Ripper". There must be better terminology
How about A={Swerve, Don't Swerve}?
24.7.169.193 (talk) 06:11, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example 

message: I propose to replace "dynamic game" with "sequential game" here and in other articles.
The term "dynamic game" is redirected to "sequential game". Both terms are used in game theory articles, apparently the meaniong is exatly the same.
The use of different terms for the same meaning should be avoided.  "Sequential game" opposed to "simultaneous game",is a self explaining term, "dynamic game" is not.
--RomualdoGrillo 17:12, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think dynamic game is more general: it merely states that there is a time dimension. The repetition of a simultaneous game is dynamic, yet not sequential.Koczy (talk) 22:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  If the two terms have a different meaning,the redirect "dynamic game" to "sequential game" should be replaced with a definition for "dynamic game" with a link to "sequential game".  The term is "dynamic game" is used just in the list of terms related to Game theory. It is also used here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Game_theory but not with the meaning you explained wikipedia pages,the two terms are used as synonymous. My guess is that we should add a definition of the term "dynamic game" and maybe remove it from the list of important therms related to game theory because it is seldom used (in my personal experience). Thanks.  --RomualdoGrillo (talk) 13:53, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dynamic Game" and "sequential game"
Talk:Stuck Together, Torn Apart

message: When Peter and Lois are arguing, Peter says, ""I love too much!" and "Can't you see Lois, we're alive! Dance the dance of life with me!" and proceeds to dance in a way that has to be seen to be believed. This is obviously a cult reference of some kind, I'm guessing an emotional moment in an old movie; does anyone know where it's from? boiled_elephant 02:14, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural reference 

message: Perhaps there should be a refference to the fact that Hewitt was already mentioned in He's Too Sexy for His Fat.--Nauki 15:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jennifer Love Hewitt 

message: ""It rubs the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again!," a line (though Stewie says "rubs" instead of "puts")"
:Why would Stewie say "puts"?  The line in the movie is "It rubs the lotion..." Festivalimport 03:14, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It rubs the lotion 

message: Why is the scene with Stewie jumping on the bed a copyright infringement problem?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.239.51.49 (talk) 02:06, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube/Copyright Infringement 

message: Anyone know what the guy tickling a midget in a tree ("Teehee!") is from? Antisora 12:47, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tickling a midget in a tree 
Talk:Carlo Mollino

message: The significance of this person needs to be better explained. --Jacqui M Schedler 01:48, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Charles Chaput

message: This page has significant history before it became a redirect. It was once a separate article, merged into Charles J. Chaput after discussion. In light of that history i am declining the speedy deletion tag and not performing the suggested move from Charles J. Chaput to Charles Chaput until a consensus develops after discussion on the relevant talk page. DES (talk) 20:18, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed move