lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spencer Kelly

message: In the 9th September 2006 edition of Click, he stated that the UK No. 1 single when she was born was 'Skweeze Me Pleeze Me' by Slade. This puts his birthday between June 30th and 20th July 1973. Conrad1on 04:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This edit confirms that (although is unreferenced). -- Fluteflute Talk Contributions 16:54, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that there is no reference containing his birthdate I've removed it - along with the other 'growing up' details added in that unsourced edit that confirms nothing. Gab4gab (talk) 11:14, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday 

message: The sources (employer profile page, Click profile, Curtis Brown agency profile) are not independent. Some of the article content appears to be original research, not supported by any of the current sources. Gab4gab (talk) 11:28, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability is unclear because none of the current sources are independent
Talk:Clitocybe odora

message: That's it ..i'm done..you can have it. CheersLuridiformis (talk) 06:56, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll see what I can add. The pre-existing stub was too big for it to qualify for a T:TDYK. bother. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 07:32, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi Cas 
Talk:Srgjan Kerim

message: This article is like a Facebook profile of the dude. I understand that nobody showed any interest in him, thus no one bothered to react. But the contents of this article are exactly the same as his personal web-page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.180.209.253 (talk) 11:22, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: was reverting changes to this in January 2016, but may have stopped due to WP:3RR. Noting for now that it needs a thorough revision, putting back cited material removed by . – Fayenatic London 11:08, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Facebook profile
Talk:Srikanth (actor, born 1968)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below.  Dekimasuよ! 13:13, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Srikanth (Telugu actor) →  – WP:COMMONNAME. Also his given name, also his stage name. Kailash29792 (talk)  11:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 May 2022 
Talk:Stacey Franks

message: As per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daisy Evans, I have redirected this page to the relevant section of S Club 8. DES (talk) 16:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Staciana Stitts

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.calbears.com/sports/w-swim/mtt/stitts_staciana00.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:29, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:I Am Future

message: Please demonstrate, by providing acceptable third-party refernces, that this subject qualfies for inclusion under WPs notability criteria 86.144.79.30 09:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's in the article: Cross Rhythms (major Christian music media) has reported on RPM's UK tour, a point under WP:MUSIC. --3M163//Complete Geek 09:54, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:   It needs more than a mention in one article to justify an entry here.  If that is all there is, then the article really should be reviewed for deletion.  86.144.79.30 12:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Reviews and interview here, plus "Throw Myself Into You" was added to the playlist for Cross Rhythms on-line radio. I'll see if I can find some more stuff. --3M163//Complete Geek 12:51, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good stuff, but it'll need to be a bit more than multiple plugs from the same outlet.  Same goes on the article for the lead singer, really.  I've been interviewed by The Observer and had a tune on national radio (don't ask - dreadful! lol) but it wouldn't count as notability, either.  :-)  86.144.79.30 13:52, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the comments! :-) Christian music is very hard to find verifiable sources for, as it's not generally covered by the mainstream media (for the record, I detest the arbitary distinction of "Christian" and "non-Christian" music). I'm almost positive that RPM is notable enough for Wikipedia; they've also played at Alton Towers' Ultimate Event '06 and at various youth festivals in Europe, and they have a weekly half-hour broadcast on the on-line Cross Rhythms radio. Unfortunately, Cross Rhythms is roughly the only major Christian media organisation in the UK, and so it will be very difficult to find other sources; however, I'll do my best. --3M163//Complete Geek 14:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you on the arbitrary division between secular and religious-themed music, tho I am not a Christian myself.  Have been looking around myself (sorry, just realised that my comments here didn't say that so must have looked a bit negative) and I can't find anything much either.  But if the refs for this are weak (and they are rather) then it's even worse for the lead singer, Jock At best his article should be heavily pruned and incorporated in the main article: the stuff about his wife etc is really unencyclopeadic IMHO. 86.144.79.30 14:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes; unfortunately, several fanpeople have added much useless trivia to his article in the past, so now I can't tell what's verifiable and what's fancruft. Ah, well; I'll begin incorporation. (And thanks for the article review!) EDIT: I'll be working on merging in my RPM sandbox --3M163//Complete Geek 14:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Erm... I was expecting search "I Surrender All" to land on the old hymn (citation link attempted, but my reference is blacklisted!!)  I don't know enough about that one to start the page for it, but I do know that it is much older than RPM. Featherwinglove (talk) 17:00, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Surrender All
Talk:Stan Anderson

message: There seems to be a difference of opinion regarding his date of birth; some sources give it as 27 February 1933 and others as 27 February 1934.
1933 is the date given by www.englandfc.com, www.englandfootballonline.com and www.englandstats.com; this is the date currently in the article.
1934 is the date given by his Sunderland career history, his Newcastle career history, and by Betts in his "England - player by player" () Also by www.allfootballers.com.
As all these sources are normally reliable, I have left the date as 1933, unless someone knows for definite which is correct.   Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:56, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth
Talk:Stan Webb (guitarist)

message: Without doubt, Stan is the best live blues guitarist I have heard since Peter Green -- his album recordings do not give 1% of his stage act.
Stan, if you ever read this, please issue a live recording of the kind of stuff I heard you play in Bradford in the late 1980's!!! The live material you have so far put out (that I have bought) is rather poor in comparison. Same with your DVD's!
Rosa Lichtenstein 13:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stanislav Lunev

message: Please see WP:NOT. Notmyrealname (talk) 21:35, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, no problem. You were right. I have developed this article a little.Biophys (talk) 22:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Better, but you really need to include page numbers for specific quotations. Notmyrealname (talk) 04:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed random list of quotations from book

message: "Internet Newspaper" seems like an oxymoron. Also, the link for his bio is dead. Does he still write for them?Notmyrealname (talk) 04:34, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead link on Newsmax
Talk:Stanisław Michalkiewicz

message: Man? No sound and fury about this "antisemite"? :))
Yes, he dared to criticize Jews, SOME Jews - and it would cost much. I like some of his writtings. See also Korwin-Mikke.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.168.255.62 (talk) 19:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Michalkiewicz left Radio Maryja, which by its opponents is considered to have a history of broadcasting anti-Semitic statements... [1][2]" - this is false information. Michalkiewicz still works with Radio Maryja. He worked also for Polskie Radio, but along with working for Radio Maryja.
This is his comment for them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOHAdfrc5UQ. (15/01/2015)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.107.100.116 (talk) 01:53, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  He is still in Radio Maryja. 

message: User:Ryk72 you said sources you removed are not reliable. I linked to the online copy on semantic scholar and academia, is that wrong? One source is Jewish Political Studies Review and the other is Journal for the Study of Antisemitism you can read on Journal for the Study of Antisemitism in its Wikipedia page. Why is this not reliable in your view? --AltaMalt (talk) 06:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The links removed in my edit were to .pdf files hosted on semanticscholar.org and cloudfront.net (the latter error with "access denied"), with no indication as to where or when or even if those documents had been published in reliable sources. - Ryk72 talk 06:51, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Academia puts it up on cloudfront. Are JSTOR and Researchgate ok? --AltaMalt (talk) 06:55, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. Bare URLs aren't great references. A properly formatted  template would be best. But there's other issues. Not least that these sources don't seem to actually verify the content for which they were referenced. Michael Whine in the Jewish Political Studies Review does have a paragraph on the article subject, specifically on their not being prosecuted; but not something that supports the article text. I can't find the article subject in the text of Bilewicz, Winiewski & Radzik; though the name does appear in a footnote; again nothing in that footnote to support our text. Per :WP:RSCONTEXT & :WP:SYNTH, I'm not a fan of synthesising passing mentions (including in footnotes) into bold claims; though some editors differ. I am a fan of in-text attribution of viewpoints found in individual studies or papers, particularly discussion papers, and of keeping attributed opinion below the lead section; some editors differ. - Ryk72 talk 07:12, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

text: To clarify, to include a sentence which states that someone is "known for" something, particularly in a two sentence lead, we really want sources which deal primarily with that person, and which directly make that claim. - Ryk72 talk 07:16, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ryk72 removal
Talk:Stanley Elkins

message: "Sydenham Clark Parsons Professor Emeritus of History from 1969 until his death in 2013" could not be true. One isn't emeritus until retirement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.28.145.40 (talk) 20:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  emeritus
Talk:Stanley Henig

message: Please do not add religion, ethnic, or descent categories or information to biography articles without first ensuring that 1) the category is supported by reliably sourced article content, 2) the individual identifies as such, and 3) it is a defining characteristic of the individual . Please see WP:BLPCAT, WP:EGRS, and WP:CATDEF for additional information.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots  21:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category requirements
Talk:Stanley Kamel

message: Was his name of Arabic origin? Badagnani (talk) 05:07, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname

message: This man looked similar enough to Brad_Dourif that I had confused them at one time. --64.149.41.29 (talk) 15:05, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brad Dourif 

message: how would I go about adding a link to monk on hulu.com...or is this not apropriateTheundecided (talk) 19:06, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to hulu 

message: "In Kamel's final appearance in the series, one of his hit men mistakenly killed Anthony's daughter, Antonia (Rebecca Gayheart), who had married Dylan earlier in the episode against her father's wishes. Anthony and Dylan had a final showdown at Toni's gravesite following her burial, but Dylan walked away, denying Anthony's wish that he be shot to death." Relevance?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.163.71.116 (talk) 05:45, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  trivia
Talk:Robo One

message: The current page is certainly a good start, and should prove beneficial. However, there are quite a few errors in the current text, for example:
"RoBo-One" - the official name is ROBO-ONE.
"This category is no world wide standard and different rules apply according to were the contest is held. There has been Robo-one contests in several countries including Korea and the United states (held by Robogames)."
The only competitions officially authorized by the ROBO-ONE committee are in Japan and Korea. The US competition is loosely based on the Japanese event from several years ago, and is not recognized by the ROBO-ONE committee at this time.
"The robots are usually build with RC Servos as actuators and mounted together with sheet metal shapes. Different sensors are used by the robot to perceive its surroundings. A micro controller or equivalent is controlling the robots movements and if the robot is autonomous it also adjusting the robots behavior according to what the sensors is picking up."
While this description is generally true, it needs to be expanded and clarified.
"As of 2007 there have been ten competitions in Japan and the 11th is held in March 24 in the Korakuen Hall in Tokyo."
This only refers to the primary ROBO-ONE competition, and doesn't reference the other ROBO-ONE competitions and events like the Grand Prix series, ROBO-ONE Special, ROBO-ONE J, ROBO-ONE Technical Conference, etc.
Also, the primary competitions are actually two day events with the first day dedicated to 2 minute autonomous technical demonstrations by each robot that are scored by a panel of expert judges. Only the top scoring entries qualify to participate in the bouts on the second day.
"There is no world wide standard in measurements and weights in this category and different contests got it own robot specifications."
The 'world wide' standard is established by the ROBO-ONE committee, and is used for any officially authorized competition.
"Rules - As there is no world wide standard, different rules apply to different contests but some include agility, football or wrestling."
The rules are actually very well defined, and have evolved over the past five years as the ability of the robots and their builders has improved.
"Robo-One Kits"
This section is somewhat misleading. There are a number of humanoid robot kits that have been used as the basis for ROBO-ONE entries, including the three that are currently listed. However, none of them are ROBO-ONE kits.
Tempusmaster 06:09, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Stefan Batan

message: Takes up more about the dispute between Djurgårdens IF and AIK then about the player itself. --> Halmstad, Talk to me 14:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's true, but still, he made quite a controversial move. He was almost signed for AIK, and then, moved to the archrivals. I think the text should stay at it is, as it describes pretty much everything about the dispute. Tooga - BØRK! 16:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That i dont dissagree with, it was a noticbal event in the players career, but it takes up like 90% of the article, should be something about his time in Assyriska and his time in DIF in the aswell. --> Halmstad, Talk to me 19:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'll try to add more text and sources to the article tomorrow. Tooga - BØRK! 20:09, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

text: I've rewritten and added some text. What do you think? Tooga - BØRK! 17:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate tone
Talk:Stefan Kießling

message: i will like to be your facebook friend Mr Kiebling.I am kiebuh  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.24.212.254 (talk) 23:50, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Stefan Terblanche

message: The link to Terblanche's youth team, the Boland Cavaliers, links to the Disambiguation page for Boland. I will edit the link to go directly to the rugby team. Monkthatgotfunk (talk) 16:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boland 

message: The article states that Terblanche's ratio of 0.51 is better than other players including Bryan Habana, who is listed as 0.57. Is this a typo or just wrong? Unklphil (talk) 18:04, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tries per match ratio
Talk:Stefano Pioli

message: We should mention the football chant ‘Pioli’s on fire’ somewhere (sung to the tune of Gala - Freed From Desire). Overlordnat1 (talk) 09:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pioli’s on Fire 

message: I'm rafa 46.11.6.149 (talk) 09:32, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pioliiii
Talk:Carl Gegenbaur

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Shyamal (talk) 15:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Karl Gegenbaur →  – His first name is generally spelled "Carl", not "Karl", in various databases, biographies, in his own publications, as well as the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica entry this article has used as a source since its creation in 2004. (Was this article possibly erroneously titled "Karl" in the first place then?) Monster Iestyn (talk) 16:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

text: support - Seems like the Wikipedia entry has spread the Anglicized form. Shyamal (talk) 04:43, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

text: support—At least in 1877 he was in an English journal (The Zoologist) named as "Carl" (see my recent edit on Honorary Foreign Membership of Linnean Society). --Dick Bos (talk) 14:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Have gone ahead and boldly moved this entry. Shyamal (talk) 15:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 November 2023
Talk:Stephanie J. Block

message: Need to add this to her broadway performances 212.222.181.172 (talk) 15:47, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The pirate queen
Talk:Stephanie Merritt

message: I think that this page needs to be updated and broken into sections to reflect Ms. Merritt's various activities. (E.g., Critical Work, Biographical work, and literary work). This should also be updated to include her 2010 novel, Heresy about Giordano Bruno, which is forthcoming from Doubleday, as of Feb 23 2010.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.72.133.245 (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stephanie S. Tolan

message: Someone with access to this biographical entry should probably use it to expand this article. - AdelaMae (t - c - wpn) 00:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: This article should not be speedy deleted as lacking sufficient context to identify its subject because this prolific author is notable - she is a Newbery Award Honor winner. This article should a) request of its author necessary biographical details and/or b) go to the Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron but certainly not get speedied. Plutonium27 (talk) 17:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody edited this article for years. Surely this should be deleted. there's not even third-party referencesMike 289(click on 9)!  18:08, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Nobody edited this article for years" is not - and never has been - a valid criteria for CSD. And there is in fact a existing third party reference: an external link to the Newbery Award site which lists the author. Plutonium27 (talk) 18:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess you didn't notice that there is only 2 references, the article is mostly about Stephanie's books, and the sentences that do mention her are not notable. If this should be kept, it should have a major cleanup.Mike 289(click on 9)!  18:20, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Authors papers are on file at a university. thats the end of this notability discussion.(these comments should have been added to the deletion discussion referenced at the top of this page). I have added some references and external links. of course the article is mostly about her books, she is notable as an author. once notability for an author is established, minor biographical information such as city of birth, place of education, current home, brief family mention (if sourced from an author bio) are entirely appropriate, esp. when adding the author to various categories. cleanup is entirely separate from deletion.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:19, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: I don't know how to read these LCCat records reliably nor how we should list the works anyway. Note that LC credits all three primarily to Steve Liebman (librettist?).
* , c1992 Bridge to Terabithia
* , c1999 The Tale of the Madarin Ducks
* , c2002, The Tale of Jemima Puddle-Duck
See also Talk:Bridge to Terabithia (novel)#Musical stage adaptation. --P64 (talk) 00:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adaptations
Talk:Stephen Beville

message: Please kindly refrain from undoing the contributions of 78.146.205.141 - that is me, the composer, Stephen Beville!
In addition, please do not oprhan this article, as I have personally added further links.
Thankyou,
Stephen Beville.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.203.185 (talk) 16:39, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Monkey gland (cocktail)

message: To be honest, I’ve *never* heard of this cocktail, but I did come looking for info on Dr Vornoff’s process; as the former was named for the latter, surely it shoud be a footnote in an article on the pseudo-medical procedure? Jock123 (talk) 12:20, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm guessing mostly because there is no article on the pseudo-medical procedure on which to place said footnote. -- B.S. Lawrence (talk) 19:55, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why redirect here?
Talk:Stephen Levinson

message: Is C. Curtis?
If so what is the source for thatפשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be from the very first reference in the reference list: http://www.ukwhoswho.com/view/article/oupww/whoswho/U24384 Replayful (talk) 18:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  C. Curtis?