lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ottone Visconti

message: I have reverted the image of the Visconti coat of arms to :File:Coat of arms of the House of Visconti (1277).svg on Bernabò Visconti‎, Galeazzo I Visconti‎, Galeazzo II Visconti‎, Luchino Visconti (died 1349), Matteo I Visconti, Ottone Visconti‎. This is because of the erroneous use of the :File:CoA Visconti.svg image that is historically inaccurate for the biographies of these pre-1395 Rulers of Milan.  Gian Galeazzo Visconti added the crown to the Visconti coat of arms in 1395 after he bought the title of Duke of Milan from Wenceslaus, King of the Romans. Peaceray (talk) 06:15, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted to Coat of arms of the House of Visconti (1277).svg because CoA Visconti.svg is historically inaccurate
Talk:Alkhurma virus

message: Uses "Alkhurma Hemorrhagic Fever (AHF)"  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:41, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: CDC

message: Hello. I'm proposing for this page's start and importance above to be re-examined -- I've done extensive research, updating, and referencing into this article, in which the article's state is quite far, IMO, above the "Start-Class" and certainly is not of the "Low-importance" level.  I'm pinging you since you seem to be the best editor to seek for in re-examining this article. Please do provide criticism when appropriate as well, if you don't mind. --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 12:35, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to C class Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 15:34, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed it to B class as reliable sources have been properly cited, contains updated and well-informed material, organized properly, infoboxes have been placed and filled out appropriately, and is easily-comprehensible and does not seem to merit a C-level class.  --Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 01:26, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating this article's start and importance
Talk:Sindi people

message: Why is the figure titled 'Etruscan'?
Jcwf (talk) 04:14, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I can not believe this: >> Many of the Sindis migrated south with other Scythians to settle, e.g., in Kurdistan. Today, the large Kurdish tribe of Sindi and associated clans, as well as the Sarmi/Sarmatian tribes in northern Kurdistan still carry the ancient name of these settlers.<< 46.223.70.135 (talk) 21:09, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a uncensored part added by an anonymous user. I have removed it because it was clear personal commentary. --Wario-Man (talk) 04:51, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  please attest this statement
Talk:Chalk River

message: [Manhattan Project] page mentions in passing that a-bomb research was done here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.188.115.116 (talk) 02:08, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Canadian military personnel were also there for the clean up. They could only be exposed for a short period of time. Then they had their total lifetime dose of reduction 2001:569:5901:1100:5B6:C649:4D79:F51A (talk) 03:10, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

message: Less than a year after the discovery of nuclear fission in Germany, academic refugees flooded into the West. As Reed & Stillman (2009, p. 11) note "much of that talent converged on Los Alamos and Chalk River."  A footnote to this entry explains that "Chalk River, Canada, initially was the home of the Anglo-French nuclear weapons program."
Reed, Thomas C. & Stillman, Danny B. (2009) The Nuclear Express: A Political History of the Bomb and its Proliferation. Minneapolis, MN: Zenith Press.
Evidently the preceeding authors (the civic fathers and/or business council of Chalk River?) misremembered their community's substantive contribution to the history of nuclear proliferation.
RonWPeters  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronwpeters (talk • contribs) 07:01, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nuclear Weapons Program 
Talk:Scotobiology

message: This permission only speaks to the text copyright and not to the quality of the article or the notability of its subject.  Bastiq▼e demandez 19:59, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: PermissionOTRS

message: please may this be deleted Eugene-elgato (talk) 20:19, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Restored to last good revision ·Add§hore· Talk To Me!</span> 22:13, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you; sorry I hadn't noticed it had been legitimate previously. Eugene-elgato (talk) 22:42, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  delete 

message: I saw the toolong tag on this page, which indicated that it was too long and should be split.  The article is actually not that long, but i am assuming (in good faith) that someone thought it was a bit dense and unreadable.  While the wording remains the same, I organized into sections, and re-arranged them to make more sense.  Hopefully the article is a bit more readable.  With indugence i have removed the toolong tag.  I considered removing the nofootnotes tag as well, as almost all of the footnotes are inline with the text, but need to read more of the history of the article first.  (although any time a tag is added to an article, there should be a corresponding note on the talk page, right?).  I invite anyone else to deal with adding references and citations as needed to continue cleanup on this page. Nothingofwater (talk) 18:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  re-organizing page
Talk:Robert Pastor

message: This page needs a lot of work, more than I can do for it. I put the cleanup tag on it, but it may need a complete rewrite, since it's basically a stub as is. Also, the extremely POV quote should be at least couched within a "Criticism" section, with appropriate NPOV introduction, if not removed to another article or taken out entirely. The article should probably also conform to the standard for a biographical article, since it is about a person, and one who's still alive at that.—Goueznou, 12.107.67.3 19:59, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The North American Idea: A Vision of a Continental Future by Robert A. Pastor, Reviewed by Richard Feinberg Foreign Affairs November/December 2011
99.19.44.155 (talk) 14:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resource 
Talk:Marek's disease

message: "Occasionally misdiagnosed as an abtissue pathology" -- "abtissue" isn't a word. Did a vandal remove part of a sentence? 86.164.23.31 (talk) 20:27, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some kind of typo or error 
Talk:Sam Spade (software)

message: I created this stub because there was a redlink in the Sam Spade article, and as I happen to have a copy of the Sam Spade tool (version 1.14) which I still use occasionally. DFH 20:11, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I created this stub 

message: Having just reinstalled Windows -- and Sam Spade, of course -- I'm wondering if there are any suitable replacements for Sam Spade, considering it's now ten years old. I did do some research a couple of years ago (the last time I reinstalled Windows) and didn't find anything suitable.
Anyone have any suggestions for something more modern that fills Sam Spade's big shoes?
--Craig (t|c) 01:31, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version or suggested replacement? 

message: - Who is John Galt? ✉ 16:21, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Roman governor

message: As you can see at the very beginning of this article the word "penis" is repeated multiple times (by most probably a nerd teenager who just found out he has one), but removing it is more difficult than expected. It appears as if the page source does not actually include this, nonetheless, it can be removed if one removes {­{Template:Roman government}}. And for some reason that phrase is automatically replaced with "penispenispenis" etc. even here on the talk page. Also I did not get any wiser from looking in the history.
I am fairly new to contributing to Wikipedia, and I ask forgivness for if I have used wrong phrases and if this is posted in the wrong place.  Mqchen 20:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: I was redirected to this page when hitting a hyperlink in another Wikipedia article for "consular prefect," yet there is no mention of that office or title on this page.  Read in context, the office of consular prefect mentioned in other articles does not seem to be identical to any of those mentioned here.  If it is, then it should say so here.  If it is some related sub-species it should be mentioned and delineated as a number of other offices are here.  If it is essentially different it ought not to redirect here.  TheCormac (talk) 14:24, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Consular Prefect

message: First time editor - I undid an edit from 01:31 March 5 2013 that simply removed half of the opening sentence. After correcting it I noticed that there were two other edits the following two minutes that deleted large segments of text with no explanation. I'm not entirely sure if this was vandalism or not, so I don't feel qualified to just replace the removed text. If somebody else could weigh in on this it would be greatly appreciated. 69.11.112.39 (talk) 07:54, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Vandalism 

message: What council was in charge of appointing them?ZFT (talk) 01:55, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Republican governors
Talk:Forti FG01

message: Is this really necessary? There were only two... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mattbuck (talk • contribs) 15:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Forti Formula One cars
Talk:Lithic technology

message: Against this merger proposal, since each topic is distinct (even if related) and both topics are quite extensive in eventual content. Umbertoumm (talk) 13:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger is bad idea

message: This discussion is about lithic reduction. Nothing whatsoever is said of lithic reduction in this article nor does anything whatever imply that anything is going to be said or ought to be said. Lithic technology as stated according to terminology in the field is about the technocomplex, which is a typology. Stone tool covers that in conjunction with Stone age. No need to cover it yet once again here. But, what YOU are talking about is the techniques of reducing the stone to the type. Now, this topic is covered under stone age and quite a few other articles, which is not to say another good overview article would not be appropriate. However, this is not it. It seems to me you have either to merge this into stone tool, which can be easily done, since this article says next to nothing, or merge it into some one of the other articles really about lithic reduction, or make this one into a lithic reduction article, and I don't care which. Your choice, but let's not call lithic technology lithic reduction.
By the way this discussion is in the wrong place. The tag directs us to discuss under Stone tool, which I did, but no one was there to discuss. Furthermore, the above discussion treats the subject as closed. You voted, and that was that. Lithic reduction should not be merged; the only trouble is, this is not Lithic reduction. What you are going to do now I have NO idea. Technically speaking, since the matter was regarded as closed, the tags should have been removed. Are you interested in keeping antique issues alive or in good articles? I don't care what you do except useless tags seem to me to be unduly provocative and counterproductive. So if no one previously concerned (that was some time ago) is now interested I am at some point not too far away going to remove the tags, except for the request for references. You do need references, but first you need some subject matter and that seems to be the current issue.Dave (talk) 01:43, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Not about lithic reduction

message: The material discussed in this article would be MUCH clearer if accompanied by labeled diagrams.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.24.5.76 (talk) 18:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagrams needed
Talk:Johnny Christmas

message: Something is amiss with them, but I can't put my finger on it. I couldn't find his real ones listed online anywhere. Jc121383 (talk) 00:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, the columns are incorrect. I'll fix it, but here's the source . Mitico (talk) 18:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MLL stats 
Talk:Yours Faithfully

message: This article is just terrible. It looks like a 6-year-old wrote it by cutting and pasting the description from the U.S. iTunes store, plus added the track listing and an Amazon link. The whole thing needs to be scrapped and re-written. Rhythmnation2004 20:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs MAJOR cleanup 

message: "Baby, I'm In Heaven" was originally written for Tejano singer Selena who died at the age of 23. Selena was going to record the song on her death date March 31, 1995. The demo to the produced song was turned over to Rebbie Jackson who tributed Selena.
Actually the song was on Trey Lorenz's 1992 debut album first - co-written by him too. That should definitely be mentioned in the article. Jjmcspooh (talk) 23:43, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baby I'm in Heaven
Talk:Purple Haze (Eureka)

message: I thought that Jimi Hendrix used "Purple Haze" as a reference to a kind of LSD.  Anybody know 4 sure?
:Purple Haze is not about drugs, according to its article. - Peregrine Fisher 20:52, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about the Marijuana reference in Trivia section

message: Can anyone tell me what the name of the song is that Seth is playing while he is spraying the pesticide? I've heard it in many different places but I have no idea what it is called or who composed it, and it drives me nuts. 142.177.58.197 03:09, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classical song
Talk:The Haunting of Alaizabel Cray

message: I'm fairly sure a lot of the information on the page is inaccurate. For example, in the Wych-kin section, I'm almost positive that the Glau Meska aren't Wych-kin and don't live on Earth, and I'm pretty sure that nothing about corporeal or non-corporeal Wych-kin was mentioned. I haven't read the book in a long time and didn't read the article, but it should be cleaned up by someone who knows what they're doing.
You have a point. I'm not so sure about the Glau Meska not being wychkin part, but other than that I think you might be right. I haven't read the book in a while either, but I'll read it soon and sort the article. Cslashb 08:15, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Anthon Berg

message: Anthon ban đầu là một cửa hàng thực phẩm xanh Copenhagen và sau đó người con trai  Gustav Anthon, tạo ra một dòng sô cô la cao cấp cho hệt thống đại lý lâu năm của mình bao gồm các tầng lớp trung lưu và thượng lưu lớp trên của xã hội Đan Mạch. Công ty được thành lập vào năm 1884. Giá trị Anthon Berg khoảng  600 triệu USD. Hôm nay phần lớn thuộc sở hữu của gia đình Anthon và được quản lý bởi Toms International.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toritran (talk • contribs) 19:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiếng Việt 
Talk:The Dear Hunter

message: * - deletion reviewed Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 February 10. Guy (Help!) 13:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That is, in scientific terms, a shit ton of unreleased EP's. Should they be listed here, considering wikipedia is not a crystal ball and all that? Dizzizz (talk) 14:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  all those EP's
Talk:Morton Peto

message: The reference to Peto's work on a railway in Cornwall being a "failure" is incorrect. The railway concerned was the Cornwall Minerals Railway, which was taken over by the GWR three years after Peto's contract was fulfilled in 1874. Basilwatkinsosb (talk) 17:17, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Cornwall Minerals Railway -his last contract
Talk:Andrew Coburn (author)

message: Found this page by accident ... why is the author's last name not capitalized? Is there any way to fix that? Lesonyrra 20:44, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You click the "move" tag and move the article to the correct name. I already did that, yes. -- ReyBrujo 20:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization
Talk:Plebe Summer

message: I am currently working on completing this page and will include various citations from reputable sources before I am finished with the page. The page is no complete with many sources cited throughout the article.
:I'm removing the A7 tag.  It clearly does not apply because A7 only applies to people, groups, companies and web content, of which this is not.  However, even though the USNA is a reliable source, it's also primary.  An article would need third-party sources as well; I have no doubt such source exist.  ColourBurst 03:09, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The M-1 phaseout is probably worth mentioning in the USNA main article history. One sentence with a ref. Student7 (talk) 03:02, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Quad-band

message: I got in Japan recently with a "quadband 2G phone", and found myself unable to place phonecalls.
There is currently no more GSM operator in Japan. You'll need at least a 3G phone to place calls, that's what I was told from my phone provider in France (Orange).
88.175.52.8 05:46, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2G and Japan? 

message: If you want to merge, then I suggest you create an article for GSM Bands, where all of them are merged as and put as different sections of the same article.
--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Victor of Turin

message: There is only one notice about a Bishop Victor. He was a member of an embassy sent by King Theoderic to the King of Burgundy in May 494. Nothing else about him is known, except a dubious reference in the "Passion of the Holy Martyrs of Turin:, which places a Victor in 310. He may have been a successor of Maximus II, but it is unlikely that he was the immediate successor. See: ; and Lanzoni, Francesco (1927). Le diocesi d'Italia dalle origini al principio del secolo VII (an. 604). Faenza: F. Lega; pp. 1047-1048.
--Vicedomino (talk) 19:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date disputed
Talk:National Museum of the History of Ukraine in the Second World War

message: I don't know if any of you know this but next to the actual lady there is an exhibit of Soviet weaponry (tank/planes/artillery etc.) dating from the beginning of the 20th century up until about the 80s, and another exhibit of the Soviet war in Afghanistan (1979-1989) with some more examples of the Soviet arsenal. I wasn't sure if this should be mentioned and regarded as part of the museum, or if this should be ignored and considered a coincidence (seeing as this is article IS about the Great Patriotic war). I just wanted to know what everybody thought... Bogdan 03:20, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum Attachments?...no? 
Talk:Brooklands tram stop

message: Removed 
	"The station closed in April 2017 for a number of weeks whilst refurbishment works took place. This has provided the station with updated facilities."
Unsuccessful in finding a reference for this. Although the car park was temporarily reduced in size in April 2017, for substation work, there is no evidence I can find for a station closure, which I imagine would have been reported.
Thanks,~OxonAlex (talk) 16:52, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed uncited Information
Talk:Lists of Hong Kong films

message: This is a really, really, REALLY, ambitious list...  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 14:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambitious
Talk:Experimental aircraft

message: The Ekip-Tarielka is a series of experimental Russian aircraft built by the heroic Soviet military pilot & aircraft designer Lev Nikolaevich Schukin between 1978 & 1996. Ekip is an acronym for Ekologiya i Progres or Ecology & Progress, it was designed to carry heavy loads of over 100 tons very quickly over large distances for minimal costs. Due to its maximum use of the Coanda effect on its hull, it is the most efficient heavier than air craft in the world & its design features could easily be incorporated into a lighter than air hybrid vehicle for even greater efficiency. Dubbed the 'Russian Flying Saucer' the unusually rotund aircraft only uses short stubby wings but has a 'lifting body' with an 80% capacity & can take off on flat land or water with just 600 metres of runway. Its turbo-jet engines are contained within the aerodynamic body, providing both forward thrust & an air cushioning landing system similar to a hovercraft. Despite successful prototype development, with the collapse of the Soviet Union, funding for the project ceased but the concept has been kept alive by by enthusiasts such as Edward Isaev who believes the innovations started by the Ekip will only prove useful in the era of Peak Oil & global ecological awareness.
Insert footnote text herehttp://www.ekip-aviation-concern.com/eng-b/0.shtmlPachakuti2012 (talk) 00:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ekip - Tarielka  

message: I think this phrase was coined by Buckminster Fuller in the 1930s to describe hybrid vehicles that can travel anywhere, in the air, on land, on & under the water. His Dymaxion Car was designed to be a prototype to test this theory but due to monetary limits it never actually flew. I wonder if this should be a Wikipedia category of its own? Besides the 'Flying Sub' from Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea I don't know if this topic has really been discussed in great detail. Does anyone else know of any other flying submarine cars?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pachakuti2012 (talk • contribs) 03:31, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is not the place for info on individual aircraft or types. In addition, we cannot accept articles based primarily or totally on information from the company's own website. It needs to be based primarily on reliables published sources from aviation magazines, etc. Thanks. - BillCJ (talk) 03:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  omni medium transport
Talk:Transitus Fluvii

message: The uncited Passing the River article should be merged (if anything of value is here) and redirected to Transitus Fluvii. I have no investment, other than I stumbled across this and noticed the lead and also a comment on the talk page of passing the river. Missvain (talk) 05:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirecting, rather than merging, as there is no referenced content despite being tagged since 2016. Klbrain (talk) 09:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Passing the river]] into [[Transitus Fluvii]]