lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Satellite Blues

message: I found :Image:ACDC Stiff Upper Lip.JPG and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:ACDC Stiff Upper Lip.JPG]]

message: :Image:ACDC Stiff Upper Lip.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ACDC Stiff Upper Lip.JPG
Talk:Saying Sorry

message: Where are there racist subliminal messages in this song? Can we get some refrence for this? Thanks
69.183.179.161 00:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racist Subliminal Messages? 
Talk:School Days (Chuck Berry song)

message: The AC/DC stuff in the infobox isn't really appropriate, is it? Shouldn't it be the Chuck Berry version (or at least include it, if the AC/DC info remains)? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by InnocuousPseudonym (talk • contribs) 23:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Nothing to Fear (Oingo Boingo album)

message: For a long time it has been written on this article that it's a ska album, which I find odd. While the band wrote punky ska songs on other albums (eg Little Guns) and played some numbers in a ska style during their early live shows, this record has almost no ska influence at all. It is very much a new wave/rock/synth pop album. I would argue the only part that resembles ska in the whole record is some off-the-beat guitar notes in the verses of Private Life (an otherwise very new wave song), which is not a reason to categorise the whole record as 'ska'.
Any citation I can find referring to the Nothing To Fear record specifically as ska (eg in its 'Allmusic' article) I've found to be very flippantly put, unresearched and unreliable. You'd only need to listen to the album the whole way through to hear it isn't ska.Woombamillio (talk) 17:14, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Ska influence
Talk:Anita Barone

message: Why did she only play Carol in Friends once?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.80.32.9 (talk) 04:44, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Changed BFA institution from University of Detroit Mercy to University of Detroit.  The source cited states Barone graduated in 1986, U of D did not merge with Mercy College until 1990.Goldnpuppy (talk) 07:54, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alma mater
Talk:Aleksandr Pavlenko (footballer, born 1985)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved I will perform the actual move after fixing the links. Regards,   —usernamekiran (talk) 07:42, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 August 2023
Talk:Aleksandr Pavlovich Aleksandrov

message: I believe this person has been mixed up with another guy with a very similiar name, which is Aleksandar Panayotov Aleksandrov. He was selected in the Intercosmos group in 1978, but was This Moscow born Aleksandr selected in that group as well? I don't think so, since he was Russian borne.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.228.96.111 (talk) 06:27, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aleksandr Rogozhkin

message: He is Alexander. Just as Pushkin. 83.174.234.78 (talk) 12:23, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aleksandr?
Talk:Alexander Rutskoy

message: The Supreme Soviet article says it was disolved in 1991. How then could Yeltsin do it again in 1993? Please address.
--Damifb 13:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was Supreme Soviet of the USSR. The Supreme Soviet mentioned in this article is the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR.--Dojarca 12:27, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supreme Soviet 

message: Seeing as Rutskoy has been the only VP of the Russian Federation, is there any 'source' about the dissolution of the Russian Vice Presidency? GoodDay 21:43, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, the adoption of the new Russian Constitution in 1993 (following the coup attempt), dropped the Vice Presidency, leaving the prime-minister as 'temporary successor'. GoodDay 21:49, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vice President of Russia 

message: I replaced Supreme Court with Russian Supreme Court.  It should probably be replaced with Supreme_Court_of_the_Russian_Federation, Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation,  or whatever the 1993 equivalent was.  This also needs a citation.  My edit is just a quick-edit to point people in the right direction.  76.186.89.202 21:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian constitutional crisis of 1993 

message: Did Mr. Rutskoy really die?
Can anyone find some sources please?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.210.9.36 (talk) 20:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: It's been removed three times  
 
 without any explanation, reasoning or useful information in the edit summary, even after I added two references that verify he was acting president . I've invited the editor that removed it to this talk page to contribute his thoughts on why it should be removed. Ha! (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That was correct removal. My very best wishes (talk) 03:08, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''"Russian Presidents"'' tag 

message: Is there no current one available?--Euroruss (talk) 08:17, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture almost 20 years old
Talk:Aleksandr Skorobogatko

message: Amost42n81 (talk) 23:59, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

message: It is hard to understand what knowledge of this individual is gained by inclusion of these two sentences:
"In November 2017 an investigation conducted by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalism cited his name in the list of politicians named in 'Paradise Papers" allegations.'
"Skorobogatko is one of many "Russian oligarchs" named in the Countering America's Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, CAATSA, signed into law by President Donald Trump in 2017."
The cited report itself says that being named as holding an offshore bank account is meaningless in and of itself, since there are many legitimate reasons for holding an offshore account. Indeed, joining Mr. Skorobatko on that list are Queen Elizabeth II, two Canadian prime ministers, and many other persons e=who have not been accused of any misdeeds. So why include something that adds nothing while creating the impression of some illicit activity? 
The same is true with the second sentence. Mr. Skorobatko is not under sanctions; he was on a list of Russian "oligarchs" that was submitted with the legislation. the list itself was compiled by Forbes, as was acknowledged in the legislation, and is does not constitute any kind of designation by the U.S. government. the statement is true, but it is too clever by half. Including it creates a false and potentially defamatory impression. That Skorobatko is an oligarch is obvious, so why do this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amost42n81 (talk • contribs) 01:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This is still significant enough to include, so I am reverting its removal.  The normal procedure here is to discuss well-cited content BEFORE removing it.  And see WP:BRD. Edwardx (talk) 14:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading and Prejudicial Statements
Talk:Secret Smile (song)

message: This song was released in 1998 not 1999 one waywe know is becae it was used in the fourth epiosde of the fist season of Charmed which was filmed and releasd in 1998. --Buffyfan882 (talk) 19:40, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: While the song was on their 1998 release "Feeling Strangely Fine" the 1999 release year refers to the single.
70.88.213.74 (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1998 not 1999
Talk:Secretly

message: If Jimmie Rodgers had a big hit with "Secretly", and the Lettermen had a minor one, why should there be a big, hulking thing about the Lettermen's hit songs on this page? Does that make sense? I don't think it does.Slater79 00:15, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: JIMMIE RODGERS had the hit with this song, NOT the Lettermen.

message: I moved the Lettermen infobox to the bottom of article. I think that this makes sense, and is reasonable. Please contact me if you feel that it's not. Slater79 00:46, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I moved the Letterman infobox

message: The lyrics seem to have many meanings. It could be disapproval based on race, age, class etc. Perhaps that was the songwriter's intention? To be as general as possible? Obviously this is straight out of the 1950s along with the attitudes from that time. Narrowing it down to one modern interpretation in the main article feels like speculation and may be contrary what the songwriter intended (and there's no way of knowing that without a source). 
By the way, anyone else think some of the melody sound similar to that of Silhouettes (The Rays song)?        New5719 (talk) 00:58, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: meaning
Talk:See Emily Play

message: Re: Goodbye Cruel World sounding like this - not especially, the bass line is typical of Waters' style, and the track is very much more close to Careful with That Axe, Eugene in my opinion. --Ritchie333 18:46, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Similiarity

message: The "Date Recorded" in the article and the box-out don't tally.  Any idea which is correct? --Cal42 10:05, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date Recorded

message: Was the original cover image black and white, or was it pink? I'm gessing that this one just a modern re-printng? Martinevans123 (talk) 09:03, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover art 

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5R8EpAv4miA  
Andy Dingley (talk) 10:11, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: We can safely assume that ForbiddenInGermany4 holds the copyright to this film? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:46, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Of course not.  But it's a well-known film and should at least be mentioned here. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:56, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, Andy. Then it's a potential breach of copyright and we can't even risk posting the link here (regardless of the those license statements in the additional info box)? Or so I've been told, at some length, in the past. The fact it's "well-known" is irrelevant. Martinevans123 (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  p.s. so is that the same bridge, in Brussels, used for the "Paintbox" lipsynch video (allegedly Gilmour's first appearance on film with the band)? Martinevans123 (talk) 21:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Belgian Cricket film 

message: I don't know how to reference it in the article, but in a BBC Radio interview with Emily Young that I saw recently she gives the idea that 'Emily' is Sids creative side, his internal muse. Is this worth referencing?
Clip here. 
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1631789653559534 I Hate Banner adds (talk) 11:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emily?
Talk:See That My Grave Is Kept Clean

message: Using the same Deadbase that Mudwater used, the song: One Kind Favor, which was played 4 times in 1966, is See That My Grave Is Kept Clean. The confusion comes from a line in the song which askes the listener for "one kind favor...see that my grave is kept clean," being used as the title by tapers not knowing the original title of the song. Moorematthews 03:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, good one.  Thanks for explaining.  "P.S." Then there's The Bonnie Lass o' Fyvie, also known as Peggy-O. -- Mudwater 05:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grateful Dead
Talk:Self Esteem (song)

message: The wrestler 'American Dragon' Bryan Danielson often used this song as his entrance music in Ring of Honor. It maybe worth mentioning? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.134.220.131 (talk) 22:18, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds more like Nirvana, to be honest. Pretty sure the song was influenced by them; it has a Teen Spirit-sounding guitar riff and a ¨Yeah¨ chorus like Lithium. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 16:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: Why does 'Self Esteem' redirect to 'Self-Esteem' and not the other way round though the song is called 'Self Esteem'? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.132.106.127 (talk) 15:25, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: I have removed a claim about the song sampling the 1990 song De Música ligera by Argentine band Soda Stereo. Though both songs clearly use the vi-IV-I-V displacement of the standard doo-wop chord progression, there is no discernible sampling involved. I assume the person who added that bit of information meant that Self Esteem is a cover of or is inspired by the Soda Stereo song, but even that is far-fetched. 
Some more notable examples of this chord progression (and thus, more likely sources of inspiration) are the 1967 song San Francisco (Be Sure to Wear Flowers in Your Hair) by Scott McKenzie or The Passenger by Iggy Pop from 1977. KovacsUr (talk) 14:17, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  De Música ligera 

message: IT was a big hit in germany 
and was certified PLATINUM there
1995 when it was certified   the sum for Platinum certification had been 500,000  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.247.246.186 (talk) 14:35, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  PLATINUM in GERMANY
Talk:Sell Out (Reel Big Fish song)

message: This is a bit long to still be classed as a stub is it not?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.14.82.72 (talk) 17:18, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:September Song

message: Frank Sinatra sang this song and recorded it on a Columbia Record 37161 on 7/30/1946 as well. Racedodge (talk) 04:06, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Incorporated into article.--Das48 (talk) 08:54, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is there a Willie Nelson template on this page?Mannanan51 (talk) 21:23, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template
Talk:Only a Lad

message: I don't really see the lyrics of this album as having a libertarian message. Can anyone provide any sources that prove that the person who wrote this analysis is correct, or opinions from critics who agree with these opinions? (Sugar Bear (talk 04:17, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The title track is clearly not anti-libertarian; the final portion of the lyrics make it clear that most of the lyrics are sarcastic and that "only a lad" is not an excuse for young men to shoot and run over innocent people.  "Capitalism" was mentioned by National Review Online as one of the "50 greatest conservative rock songs" .  However, the song interpretations clearly need to be better sourced.  Since the album is old and not the most well-known, however, this means digging through old magazines and such, and thus may never be done unless someone really loves this album (and this interpretation of it).  Hopefully someone will source these claims before a zealous Wikipedian deletes them as WP:OR. Calbaer 20:29, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libertarianism 

message: The song little girls seems to have a feeling of paedophillia, is this what the song is about?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.43.57 (talk) 15:39, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  little girls 

message: At the time Elfman wrote the song "Capitalism", he considered himself to be right-wing. He only changed his views later and NOW CLAIMS that the song was facetious. He'd rather go back on his earlier word rather than admit that he believed in the song's lyrics when he wrote them.--50.39.221.35 (talk) 06:09, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left-wing/right-wing
Talk:Set on You

message: This currently points to a not terribly notable recording A Trick of the Night, to which I have added a hatnote pointing to the much-covered song Got My Mind Set on You.
It seems to me that it should probably be the other way around. Not that it matters much. Mainly it just makes us look rather silly IMO, and encourages other fans of less notable acts etc to promote their favourites here. 
Raised with the WikiProject, which seems active. Andrewa (talk) 02:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redir target
Talk:Aleksei Yeliseyev

message: He was never awarded this title, there are a limited number of awards. You will not find his name on this list. This entry will be deleted. --de:TK-lion (talk) 07:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[de:Held der DDR|Hero of the GDR]]
Talk:Aleksey Batalov

message: According to The Hollywood Reporter and IMDB he died on Wednesday June 14, 2017  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.38.189.88 (talk) 20:46, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death 
Talk:Scott Caan

message: so far, he have recently played male roles in different flims since 1995. but he never been played a female role in a film before.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.28.93.134 (talk) 16:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  current film roles 

message: There was an article about Scott in GQ or something a few months back about his lifelong passion for photography.  His keen eye and sensitive images may be worth a mention on his page.  His photos are here http://www.scaanphoto.com/  74.97.39.234 (talk) 03:24, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scott Caan's photos 

message: Scott Caan was in the MOVIE Mercy as Johny Ryan, not the TV series Mercy. (The 2010 film not the 2000 movie by the same name starring Julian Sands.) The link merely needs to be fixed.   Acorns-2-Oaks (talk) 20:43, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scott Caan was in the MOVIE Mercy, not the TV series Mercy 
Talk:Seventy-Six Trombones

message: "... if such a band actually existed, it would be at least a tenth of a mile long."
Assuming what?  The band members marching in single file?  Ten abreast?  At what spacing?  This statement should be qualified or removed from the article. —QuicksilverT @ 15:11, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I've removed it. Feezo (Talk) 02:15, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel words 

message: Well, I know I knew this song in high school, and indeed I marched in the band.  And only four-plus decades later do I notice a problem:  It's not possible for 76 trombonists and 110 coronetists to be marching in the standard rectangular marching formation, unless it's rows of 2 abreast, with 38 rows of trombonists and 55 rows of coronetists.  (Long formations like this are a problem for marching bands:  Sound takes time to travel, so if everyone keeps the beat by seeing the drum major's baton, the sounds from other ends of the band arrive off beat, which makes it really hard to keep in step.)
I explored wedge-shaped formations, which start narrower and expand.  One could start narrower and add one more person in each successive row.  However, there's only one of those that adds up to 76 (8 rows, with 6, 7, 8 ...13 people in a row), and no multiple of 13 people can contain the 110 coronetists.  Besides, if the formation is centered, it shifts people half a width each row, which makes it hard to keep position.
One could start narrower and add two people in each row.  There are no such "wedges" starting with an odd number of people in the first row, and only one "wedge" starting with an even number:  a row of 16, then 18, 20, and 22 people.  Then come five rows of coronetists, 22 people in each row.  A fairly wide formation, but maybe workable for "the cream of every famous band".  --CambridgeOrbital (talk) 18:27, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  76 and 110 marching how? 

message: As the song is an important gesture in the film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.155.184.178 (talk) 06:57, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  include "the other sister" in pop-culture appearances
Talk:Sexy MF

message: As I understand it, there is no such thing as being banned from radio as such, as nobody has the authority to do so.  The BBC maintained a list of songs that were banned from BBC radio, but they didn't ban this one.  Instead, an engineer edited the track to remove the offending lyric (covering it up with a conveniently-sized guitar hook), and laid an announcement over the intro (by Mike Read, IIRC) that this was specifically created for radio and not available commercially.  81.110.104.91 (talk) 21:52, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I may be mistaken, but I recall the announcement being by Gary Davies. --Walnuts go kapow (talk) 20:57, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banned from UK radio? 

message: The correct title is "Sexy MF", as seen on the record cover, the track listing on the back, and the record label itself, so I'm moving the page to the correct title. These can be seen at discogs. Markfury3000 (talk) 18:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct title