lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hönne

message: Why two images with the Hönne in Menden? They look nearly the same. Should't we change this? --Weissmann 16:06, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: :Can someone give a source for the exact lenght? de:Hönne mentions "about 30 km.". NielsF 18:07, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Too bad I cannot find anymore where I found that number when I originally created this article. I could find the catchment area now, but sadly that source doesn't say anything about length. I will look further if I can find any references, or a different number. andy 18:55, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Weissmann 06:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The length of the Hönne in Balve 13,2 km , in Menden 11,4 km -> this means 24,6 km. 8,4 km for Neuenrade and Fröndenberg? I would say this could not be possible. --Weissmann 10:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I just found that number, and as it's from a office of NRW it should be rather authorative.  says thre Hönne has 27.8 km within the Märkischer Kreis, that'd mean another 5.2 for Fröndenberg. Haven't checked a map if that'd reasonable however, but it's the best I could find with google. Probably have to check some offline sources like books as well. andy 11:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for you effort! I've included the info in the Dutch article. NielsF 17:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Hmmm, still not sure about the numbers. As the Ruhr marks the boundary between Menden and Froendenberg, and thus also the boundary of the Maerkischer Kreis, the Hoenne is completely within MK. Thus the two numbers directly contradict themself... andy 12:49, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: An information from Neuenrade: the Hönne is 6,5 km in this city. --Weissmann 15:23, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So that would make it 13,2 + 11,4 + 6,5 = 31,1 kilometers long instead of 33, according to your information. Where did you get the info from? The city itself? NielsF 18:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Hönne has nothing to do with Fröndenberg, I guess. My suggestion: Deleting the reference to Fröndenberg. Any comments? --Weissmann 10:34, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But it ends near Fröndenberg, doesn't it. Even though it does not touch the area of the town Fröndenberg, its mouth is much nearer to the town center of Fröndenberg than to Menden. andy 11:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And Niels, I have got the information from the city administration of Neuenrade. That's right. --Weissmann 18:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Length
Talk:Splott

message: These were reverted by Golbez on 13 June 2006. I agree that turning every 4-digit number into a link is not useful. Also, numeric values in text should be in words (as "two") not digits ("2") - I agree with the reversion of these, too.
I have reinstated the paragraph bringing some of the history up-to-date and inserted a bridging sentence. However, 83.67.65.99 cites no reference to validate his paragraph, so if anyone can supply validation please do so - alternatively, if you know it's incorrect, amend or delete it.
83.67.65.99's paragraph about railway lines doesn't really fit into any of the sections in this article. I have preserved it here:
:There is a Splott Junction in the railway access to Cardiff Docks. The roads around it contain many "level crossing without gate or barrier" and "location of level crossing without gate or barrier" signs from the 1970s.
in case anyone adds a section to the article on Rail links or suchlike, and wants to use information from 83.67.65.99's contribution.
Euchiasmus 05:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: re edits by 83.67.65.99

message: I would love this derivation to be true, but can find no reference to this Welsh word for allotment that bears any real relation to "splott" Wishful thinking? Hence citation needed.Darorcilmir (talk) 19:02, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: History - Allotment?
Talk:Row- and column-major order

message: The section claims Python stores lists of lists. But in fact python stores in Iliffe format, because python lists are arrays/vectors of pointers, not linked lists. Not sure how to properly cite this because there's no python spec.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.248.248.1 (talk) 20:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Python uses Iliffe
Talk:List of Taylor University People

message: Usually you go by last name when organizing this kind of thing.  We aren't in Asia, stop changing that unless you have a reason.  Also, caps aren't supposed to be in section headers.  Stop replacing them.  
I know I sound like an asshole, but this thing has to be somewhat uniform.  Check out featured articles for a basic idea of what is expected, and thanks for the contributions.  
Brokenfrog 06:07, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Madhabi Mukherjee

message: this needs to be expanded and a photograph entered. Indranee 06:01, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This 'article' needs a complete rewrite. The content reads like a film critic's newspaper column or some piece of Mukherjee fan-mail.1812ahill (talk) 01:12, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. 
Talk:Foss v Harbottle

message: The infobox says:
| name = Foss v Harbottle
| court = Court of Chancery
| image = EdgarWoodBuilding.jpg
| date decided = Edgar Wood building, Victoria Park, Manchester
The picture, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EdgarWoodBuilding.jpg, is of this building https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Wood_Centre. The case was decided 1843. The building started construction in 1903, and its initial purpose was as a church. The building is not a date, not the court, not designed by any of the defendents, so it's not clear what relevance if any it has to the subject of the article. (Even if it looks quite nice and is 10 minutes down the road from Victoria Park.) 2A00:81C0:0:20:6631:50FF:FE3B:8A49 (talk) 15:26, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox picture
Talk:Foundation and Empire

message: Bel Riose took Ducem Barr on his "expedition". Barr is the one who told him about the "dead hand", not Devers. Barr also told him about the advanced technology, all of this way before Riose sets off on his conquest. Slartibartfast1992 00:04, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slight confusion 

message: Again much like the article describing Foundations, this one also carries long winded Plot summaries. Things to do, brief descriptions of each segment with 1-2 paragraphs. Nw15062 (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary 

message: Hi, I'm new here. I think some improvements are required in this article. I'm writing from memory and I'll get hold of a copy of the book by tomorrow. However, In the plot summary, I think the fact that the emperor sent an emissary to watch over riose should be mentioned. there are two other smaller issues I noticed. (1) The Galactic Empire has not ceased to exist in name at the time of the second part of the novel. In fact, we encounter the emperor himself. Moreover, the Mule also talks about how the emperor is mad and only has a little longer to live. So, the title of the emperor still has importance for the mule. (2) I dont understand the line about the mule being the only one in control of `atomic weapons'. My impression is that atomic technology is fairly common. The Mule, of course, has the most powerful navy in the galaxy. 
I'll wait for someone to respond to this and then make the changes myself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacob2718 (talk • contribs) 16:55, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Improvements Required 

message: The plot summary for "The General" needs a major overhaul, it sounds as if 9 different people wrote it haphazardly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.122.84.116 (talk) 11:26, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary 

message: Please note that this article's infobox is retrieving an ISBN from Wikidata currently. This is the result of a change made to  as a result of  this RfC. It would be appreciated if an editor took some time to review this ISBN to ensure it is appropriate for the infobox. If it is not, you could consider either correcting the ISBN on Wikidata (preferred) or introducing a blank ISBN parameter in the infobox to block the retrieval from Wikidata. If you do review the ISBN, please respond here so other editors don't duplicate your work. This is an automated message to address concerns that this change did not show up on watchlists. ~ RobTalk 01:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of ISBN from Wikidata
Talk:Tales of a Fourth Grade Nothing

message: What other sections should we work on for this??? I don't think only "Plot" will work >..< Suzumebachisecret (talk) 21:21, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there's a separate page for that... something about Fudge series characters... suzumebachi٭secret~ ~ ~ 03:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ano.... 

message: this lovely book is about two brothers named peter and fudje. peter gets a new turtle  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.116.216.239 (talk) 00:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  summary by a.c 

message: At Massachusetts Children's Book Award we list Tales of a Fourth Grade Nothing as MCBA winner in both 1977 and 1983. The sponsor/admistrator Salem State U School of Education evidently maintains a site with some archive of past material (back to 2001) but no list of past winners. Is there a page 2 or Next that I have missed?
The regional Minuteman Library Network now gives a list of MCBA winners that matches ours (to 2013). Judy Blume lists the 1978 and 1983 MCBAwards for this book. --which confirms a repeat win although the dates do not match. MCBA winners at Goodreads, whose database evidently includes all of the 1976-2010 winners, identifies no book as winner of the 1983 grades 4-6 award; in the linked display, sorted by award date, the the 1983 grades 7-9 winner simply stands alone. 
--P64 (talk) 23:26, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massachusetts Children's Book Award 

message: I've read this series of books many times over the years, Shiela Tubman lives in the apartment building and stayed in a sort of Duplex Cabin next to the Hatchers in Fudge-a-Mania but never did I read where they became cousins... I will edit the entry stating they became cousins unless someone can explain to me why I should not...
--108.245.182.16 (talk) 01:55, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is an old thread, but for the record Peter and Sheila become cousins when Peter's grandmother marries Sheila's grandfather. White Arabian Filly Neigh 16:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sheila Tubman Relationship 

message: I removed the "why?" tag next to "all post 2002 reprints of it have omitted the pictures" because (presuming it to be true) it is simply a fact that doesn't require explanation within the context of an encyclopedia article. Only the publishers would know the answer, and they are not likely to explain. One could speculate that it is either to save money or because the style of the pictures 'date' the book. Robina Fox (talk) 14:47, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustrations
Talk:Superfudge

message: Someone who knows how should begin a new catagory, something along the lines of "Books with amended text" for books, like this one, that have changed text in later editions. 66.43.44.48 (talk) 11:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Catagory: Books with amended text 

message: Controversiality is pure, blatant original research and therefore I deleted it. Mmyers1976 (talk) 01:22, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Controversiality" Section 
Talk:Jean de Reszke

message: No mention that his name was a  brand of cigarette until the 1950s or 60s. It was pronounced /də'rɛsk/. They'd never use anything spelt so unphonetically nowadays. Did he benefit from it, or did they just exploit him after he was dead? --Hugh7 (talk) 07:45, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: From an ad I read (but cannot remember where now), it seems that he was paid for the use of his name. I have been debating whether to add this, but it doesn't seem to be a notable bit of information.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:57, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a section about the cigarettes. The tobacco blend was created for Reszke. He liked to smoke, but had a hard time finding cigars or cigarettes that did not harm his voice.–CaroleHenson (talk) 17:39, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Cigarettes?

message: He was clearly a baritone (this article mentions he had a baritone voice) who sung also tenor parts.
You can hear he sung high(tenor)C using falsetto.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXT8x7874bI
Comicspiotrus (talk) 06:04, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Baritone?

message: Could someone please remove the grotesque claim that the very minor provincial German singer Willy Niering was "possibly identical to Maurice Renaud"??? Unless just a sick joke, this is speculation and conspiration-theory of the worst kind and should have no place in Wikipedia. Maurice Renaud'S life is well-documented (start here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maurice_Renaud ) and leaves no space for such silly theories. Thank you! BTW the same bullshit is also peddled on the German (and maybe other) pages on Jean de Reszke that are probably all translations of the English one. 91.64.32.147 (talk) 22:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: –CaroleHenson (talk) 23:55, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maurice Renaud
Talk:ESPN Classic (Canadian TV channel)

message: Whenever I have watched ESPN Classic Canada in the past few months, I have heard now called just ESPN Classic.  Can anyone verify that they did change their name?  Mr. C.C. 06:43, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change?

message: The Logo in Europe have changed
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:ESPN-Classic-Logo.svg
--S.fonsi (talk) 07:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New Logo
Talk:Foundation's Edge

message: *Imagine -- Which mental fibre of Novi's was different?--Hillgentleman 18:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: *The plot of Foundation's Edge is very similar to the plot of The End of Eternity.Hillgentleman 11:45, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: There's only one review here and it's very negative. I'd propose that unless folks want to add other reviews, we delete the "Reception" section entirely.
Atlant (talk) 12:23, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only one review and its's negative?
Talk:Moxon & Kobrin

message: * Helena Kobrin threatened many people for posting the "6 lines" (with the plants and trees)
* Helena Kobrin threatened many people who posted the Lerma decision, because it mentioned Xenu and the Body Thetans.
--Tilman 06:46, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More cases 

message: Seems like Ava Paquette and Kendrick Moxon are certainly notable enough to have their own article pages on Wikipedia.  Smeelgova 01:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think so, then go ahead. --Justanother 16:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not much is known about Ava. But much about Moxon (GO criminality, daughter electrocuted, and some memorable cases, e.g. Lerma, Jason Scott, Berry, etc. I'll put it on my watch list to correct / improve when time allows it. --Tilman 18:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have lots of sources for the Moxon stuff?  I am not very familiar with these issues, so I might not be the best person to create the initial article and make a good case for notability.  And probably would not be a good idea to create it as an initial stub - better to create it with lots of sourced citations and notability stuff.  Smeelgova 10:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A Kendrick Moxon article is a must. I lack the skills as a writer and research to create a competent article, however. Forgott3n (talk) 03:47, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Anything else?  Television appearances?  I think he appeared on 60 minutes trying to defend his use of the fair game policy.  Etc.  Smeelgova 05:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:     --Tilman 06:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you!  Most interesting.  Smeelgova 06:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New articles needed

message: The alt.religion.scientology "rmgroup" (on Usenet)... AnonMoos (talk) 02:43, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: other Kobrin claim to fame

message: "...Guardian's Office (subsequently usurped by the Office of Special Affairs)..."
The use of "usurped" seems awfully loaded, rather than the NPOV ideal of Wikipedia. Do the Administrators think "...subsequently reorganized as the Office of..." does the situation justice? While the change may have had great import, particularly within the ARS community, it was still just an internal administrative action (albeit admittedly of a very controversial organization). Dick Kimball (talk) 15:45, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Richard Adams (author)

message: Can we actually use that here? The template would seem to indicate that book-cover pics can only used when discussing the book itself, not its author in general. Loganberry (Talk) 16:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Repeat: can we use this? My feeling is that a book-cover image would be okay for Watership Down itself (though there we use a British cover, which is as it should be for a British book) but really is not here. Unless someone gives a good counter-argument, I'm inclined to remove it. Loganberry (Talk) 01:12, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

text: * I think you're right.  We should find an image of Adams that we can use, but the book cover should probably be removed. - Nascentatheist 01:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book cover image
Talk:Xinca people

message: In the Modern History section, there is an extended direct quote from a 2017 LA Times article:
"After the mine opened, San Rafael restaurant owner Yanet Pozuelos opened a second location to help serve hundreds of mine employees. Since mining has halted, her business has fallen 60%. “The mine helped us so much,” Pozuelos, 49, said. “We’ve never had a business that gives this many jobs.” One benefit, she said, is that it keeps young people from leaving for Guatemala City or the United States to find better-paying work"
which seems out of place. There is no clear link between this extended quote and modern Xinca history;  the quote is seems cherry-picked from an article which is mainly about Topacio Reynoso's untimely death. It is contrary to the principle of neutral POV to have a single quote in favour of mining in this place. The linked LA Times story is relevant, but a more representative summary would be fairer than this single quote. DavidHeap (talk) 14:56, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of place direct quote
Talk:Center School (Connecticut)

message: I am not a lawyer, but I believe that the photo here qualifies under fair use, or might even be public domain.  Can someone please verify this?  Silensor 06:55, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Copyright of this image expired last year, after factoring in every conceivable extension available under U.S. copyright law between 1923 - 1963.  I've added the image to the article.  Bahn Mi 00:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use imagery
Talk:CBC Television

message: This article and the article for Télévision de Radio-Canada needs A LOT of work! Sure the article for Canadian Broadcasting Corporation is chalk full of info but the articles for the specifics on both televison networks despretly needs a lot of work done on them both! MusiMax 23:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs a lot of work

message: I think we should have an affiliate and defunct stations section.  It would a little something to the article.  Mr. C.C. 06:57, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Already have one - see List of CBC television stations. — stickguy (:^›)— home - talk - 20:41, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Affiliate & Defunct Stations

message: Can we get some content on the CBC's policies for handling election coverage, as well as the cultural content it carries (ie: why British television and English accents are tolerated on CBC, while other cultures are not).--Yakym 05:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  political and cultural mandate policies? 

message: There is no mention of advertising or lack thereof on CBC here??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.18.204.247 (talk) 01:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial advertising?? 

message: See here as to why they were removed from the article. --AEMoreira042281 (talk) 19:12, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logos 

message: How do you do a page on CBC TV & not once mention the year it went on the air...?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  18:34, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's so old... 

message: Began around 1995 or 1996. Couldn't find a reference website to cite. There probably is none. Can anyone provide more information? Moonlightfocus (talk) 08:53, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stereo Broadcasting on CBC Television 

message: I've updated this page as best I could. But overall, it need a major overhaul. GoodDay (talk) 06:25, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CBC Television page, needs major updating for sure.
Talk:GOP

message: Umm, I'm just wondering why some feel the need to turn this into a disambiguation page. "Government of Pakistan"? Who in the entire world uses "GOP" to refer to that? Is there any reason whatsoever to not have the page redirect to the Republican party? Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 06:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: GOP also means Government of Pakistan. What is the harm in it? --Spasage 07:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Google up GOP for me  . Generally speaking, when the first hundred results for a page on Google give you the exact same meaning of a given acronym, we tend to make that a redirect. I can't find a shred of evidence that supports your theory that GOP is ever used as an abbreviation for the Government of Pakistan. Oh, and the harm of a disambiguation page? Wikipedia's the #7 result for a GOP google search, and if we don't send people clicking on that link directly to the Republican Party's site, we'll be a laughingstock. Please, please refrain from trying to make this a disamb page without at least giving some evidence and making your point first. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 06:54, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd think that it is the issue of systematic American bias: sure, in US GOP means the party, but for over 5 billion people outside US who use this international Wiki it can mean a lot of different things.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  20:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But not really. If you say "what does 'UEFA' mean?" to most Americans, they will give you a blank look. But that does not invalidate the logic of UEFA's article referring to the Union of European Football Associations. Why? Because there's really nothing else notable that it refers to. Really. Nothing. Look at Google if you don't really believe me. Matt Yeager ♫ (Talk?) 21:26, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Quality storyboard

message: A quality story board is a Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) study displayed in poster format. The description in the body of this article is a good start for an article on this topic or it might be merged with Shewhart cycle. The server did not respond for the external link, I wasn't able to evaluate that content.
Leaders100 07:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I put a link pointing here on storyboard, but removed the non-functioning external link, which seemed like a product promotion. --Janke | Talk 08:34, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

text: OK, the reason I originally reacted to this is that it has very little to do with conventional storyboards, a motion picture topic. The link didn't work at first, so it all looked like promotion of a product - after getting to the page, I see it's definitely not promotional. Mea Culpa! But all is well than ends well... Regards, --Janke | Talk 12:06, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled