Talk:Jay Grdina

message: I believe this is important enough to deserve the few words it gets, as his religion could be considered in noticeable conflict with his chosen profession. It is well cited, via the New York Times article. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 14:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. Whose life does not conflict with the doctrine of the catholic church? Also from a moral viewpoint there are far worse violations than creating pr0n. Think of soldiers, police, mafia. Those people are willing to kill which is a *definitive* violation of the 10 commandments which are even shared between all Christians and Jews when most of these rules are derived from common sense and are respected by everyone. Pr0n is a rather fuzzy violation. Now while the Catholic church has (currently) very strict additional rules, everyone is a sinner in their eyes anyway even by birth. Their believe is that God forgives and Jesus died for everyone's sins (not just those in the past). So I really fail to see what's so special about this guy. --217.87.99.20 10:14, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your commentary on the Catholic Church is utter dross, and completely uncalled-for on this page.  Discussions of morality and such do not have a place in a discussion of what content to place in a Wikipedia article.  AnonEMouse has made a proposal for content and is apparently willing to back it up with a reference.  Your diatribe has no such support and is patently offensive to a devout Catholic.  --TheTriumvir 02:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

text: S/he's right though. 82.45.100.187 (talk) 20:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholic

message: I've moved the following material here, because the Playboy TV source that was given to support it doesn't mention him. While his hand in producing, writing and directing the films doesn't require an external source if he's listed in the films' credits (which he presumably is), the best-selling and award-winning status of the films does need one. In addition, Playboy owns Club Jenna. That means that this info is self-published, so even if a Playboy source mentions these things, it is inappropriate to use them, particularly for material that may appear to be self-aggrandizing. If anyone wants to re-add this to the article, please find a reliable, verifiable source for it. Nightscream (talk) 17:57, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced material in need of sourcing

message: Cyberbot II has detected links on Jay Grdina which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global
If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.sexherald.com/sex-industry-interviews/club_jennas_playboy-_jay_grdina_on_relationships,_religion_and_celebrity_sex_tapes.html
*:Triggered by \bsexherald\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on [[Jay Grdina]] 

message: Cyberbot II has detected links on Jay Grdina which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global
If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.sexherald.com/sex-industry-interviews/club_jennas_playboy-_jay_grdina_on_relationships,_religion_and_celebrity_sex_tapes.html
*:Triggered by \bsexherald\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:32, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on [[Jay Grdina]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jay Grdina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061021070707/http://www.lukeford.com/stars/male/justin_sterling.html to http://www.lukeford.com/stars/male/justin_sterling.html
*Added  tag to http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/index.php?sty=70934&source=rss&dest=STY-70934
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:52, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified