Talk:Plymouth Belvedere

message: The engine displacements for virtually all years are a total disaster - virtually all incorrect. When I find time, I'll try to fix.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rehrenberg (talk • contribs) 03:12, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarify?

message: The article says, "was slightly better than a quarter of Chevrolet Bel Air and Ford Victoria production for that same period." I'm guessing it means either one, not both combined. Can somebody who knows clarify?  Lee Iacocca 09:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarify?

message: I think the Tulsa's belvedere should branch off in to it's own separate article/stub.
Things to discuss would be:
*Why the Belvedere model was chosen
*The history of the burial event
*Urban Legends that may have arisen over the decades
*The unearthing of the Belvedere
*The people involved in the original planning and burial.
*The items buried in side of the time capsule with the car.
--70.126.236.103 01:16, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tulsa's Belvedere 

message: Why the hell does the section on the '62-64 Belvedere explain how the car was "used to introduce the 426ci engine", and how it was "highly desirable with this engine as a drag car due to it's lightweight body", and how "it dominated NASCAR's Daytona with the 426ci engine" (to paraphrase), while the info box only includes the 225ci Slant-six and the 383ci V8? Seems contradictory..45Colt 00:26, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  426ci? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Plymouth Belvedere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070706155304/http://www.cnn.com:80/2007/US/06/23/buried.classic.ap/index.html? to http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/06/23/buried.classic.ap/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110927114815/http://www.tulsaworld.com/webextra/content/2007/buriedcarunearthed/articles.aspx?articleID=070613_1__Theva21346 to http://www.tulsaworld.com/webextra/content/2007/buriedcarunearthed/articles.aspx?articleID=070613_1__Theva21346
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Plymouth Belvedere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100930154753/http://www.oldcarbrochures.com:80/static/NA/Plymouth/1956%20Plymouth/album/1956%20Plymouth-05.html to http://www.oldcarbrochures.com/static/NA/Plymouth/1956%20Plymouth/album/1956%20Plymouth-05.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151105173739/http://www.unburiedcar.com/ to http://www.unburiedcar.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:27, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Plymouth Belvedere. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130205133617/http://tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=070623_238_A1_spanc67588 to http://tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=070623_238_A1_spanc67588
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Chrysler never made ANY of the V8 engines in the sidebar.  
Chrysler made a 241.3 cubic inch V8 (not a 341.3, and it was known as the 241, but not an I6 of that size.)
ALL of the V8 engine displacements are wrong, I don't know of anyone that made them except the 429 (Ford), 352 (Ford FE), and Ford also made a 462 (MEL) and a 370 (385-series related to the 426/460).  No one I'm aware of made a 461, 451, 384, or 371.
https://www.allpar.com/mopar/list.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faktbuff (talk • contribs) 01:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engines: Second Generation