lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kyungpook National University

message: The article sounds like a soapbox for the university.  I once edited it to remove non-neutral statements and to mark others that may need to sourced or fixed, but I don't feel like doing it again since it was completely ignored. YooChung 18:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just deleted text from this article which was not backed by citations to reliable sources. If anyone has sources to share, then please present them.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Soapbox-like

message: By Minerva (talk) 12:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are some statistics about who has edited it.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Who made this article? ; Subjectively devaluated contents.
Talk:Seoraksan

message: 19th century sources describing the Korean coast, including Britannica and the British Hydrographic Dept., report the most important landmark around MountSeorak as MountSedlovaya ("the saddle-shaped mountain"). It's presumably two of Seorak's ridges west of Sokcho, but Google street view is spotty and unhelpful in the area. Any idea which particular area this would be? Notionally at 38.175°N. and 5 miles inland but it may be off by a bit. — LlywelynII 03:02, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Sedlovaya
Talk:Seongsu Bridge

message: I just added a remark about how the disaster affected South Korean politics.  Someone might argue that it's rather tangential and doesn't really belong to the scope of this article.
Well... I think I have to agree.  I think we need an article that says... umm... "Man-made Disasters of 1990's South Korea," however ridiculous that may sound to non-Koreans at first sight.  (There were so many, we were referring to our country as "The Kingdom of Accident.")
Any thoughts, anybody? Yongjik 07:53, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disasters in 1990 =
Talk:Seo Taiji

message: Why was this moved from Seo Taiji? As far as I know he is not known by the name Jeong Hyun Cheol? Kappa 01:45, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Upper comments are written when moved from Seo Taiji to Jeong Hyun Cheol. That is, We said this article should be in Seo Taiji.It is the same opinion as you :) Cinnamon 23:08, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After checking the inside booklets of 7th Issue, Seotaiji (his 6th album) Seotaiji and Boys III, the '95 Taiji Boys Concert, and another (a 1996 CD with a fish on the cover), it seems he prefers to spell his name as "Seo Tai Ji" but sometimes he is listed as just "Taiji" - I have never seen his name spelled with the hyphen.  Why is the article called Seo Tai-ji? Darkpoet (talk) 03:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you on this, in fact I have never seen his name written with a hyphen until I looked here. I personally think the most correct spelling is Seo Tai Ji because he refers to himself that way. --69.254.46.13 (talk) 18:45, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Seo Tai Ji not Seo Tai-ji
Talk:Shell (computing)

message: What would be really cool would be if someone found out why a Shell is called "shell". Does it have sth. to do with real ocean shells? I found nothing about that in the net yet.--Darkstar 
: Because it's a "shell" over the operating system. Dysprosia 20:40, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Its a nut annalogy. The shell of a nut is the bit you see. Inside is the kernel which is also the inside of a nut, the bit you eat. thomashauk 19:45, 18 Jun 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: The claims that "The design of a shell is guided by cognitive ergonomics and the goal is to achieve the best workflow" were introduced in 2014 but without citations to support them.  As I remarked in my comment to my requests for citations, I don't think Thompson, Ritchie, Bourne or Joy were thinking about cognitive ergonomics and best workflow when they invented their shells.  I think they were simply trying to create the thinnest possible layers between the user and operating system.  Msnicki (talk) 12:10, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Design and goals claims 

message: Or child process or Spawn (computing) ? —Jerome Potts (talk) 10:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing on [[subshell]] ? 

message: @Appsoft4 This section focuses on mainly one shell in specific, cites few sources, and generally doesn't present a neutral POV, so I have removed it. Feel free to rewrite the section or contest this TappyTurtle (talk • contribs) 03:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  DOS and MS-DOS
Talk:Speedwell (1577 ship)

message: First version was "contributed by Vincent M. Benz, St.Louis Missouri.  8/21/2004" Stan 12:09, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: Is it worth mentioning that the name 'Speedwell' is a UK native wild flower? So as well as the pun on its abilities, it is named, like its sister ship the Mayflower, after a native wild flower.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.157.50.255 (talk) 17:07, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 'Speedwell'
Talk:Germany at the 2004 Summer Olympics

message: The rowing section seems to be missing from this article? --AmaltheaTalk 13:21, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rowing 
Talk:Hibiscus syriacus

message: I believe 무궁 means infinite not immortality. Also, even if 무궁's second meaning was immortality, 무궁 is an adjective not a noun, thus the word is in the wrong form. If anyone disagrees, please correct me, but I believe I am correct. Pooh4913 (talk) 00:45, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article treats this as an object of gardening, but incompletely: 
#What about mature height, period of blooming, soil pH, water and sun needs are missing.
#What about links to commons?
#What about its life in the wild, for which soil, water, and sun are important.
##Where is it native?
##How does it pollinate?
##What larvae does it host?
##What insects feed on nectar, foliage?
##What classes of fungi live on its roots?
-- This isn't the only article that needs this kind of information. DCDuring (talk) 19:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does this behave in the wild?
Talk:Valiant-class submarine

message: Does the reference to '12,000 miles' actually mean 'nautical miles'?
Bobblewik  (talk) 12:26, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: According to Fontenoy's "Submarines: An Illustrated History of Their Impact" p.373, all 3 units of Churchill class - according to Wikipedia's article Churchill class submarine - were simply Valiant-class ships. HMS Courageous just received an updated sonar outfit and the other boats were subsequently refitted to that standard, but they were still Valliant class submarines - all five boats of Valliant class. Not 2 as this article says. --Matrek (talk) 17:03, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This matter is discussed at Talk:Churchill class submarine#Churchill class or still Valiant class?--Toddy1 (talk) 19:45, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two or five boats of the class?
Talk:Pak Pong-ju

message: "He became an alternative member of the ruling Korean Workers' Party (KWP) Central Committee..."
What does "alternative" mean in this context? --Inc (talk) 21:24, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative member 
Talk:Nogeoldae

message: I have partially reverted recent changes to the article for the following reasons:
*  allows Chinese names in addition to Korean ones.
* The main book was a textbook of northern Chinese; the other translations are derived works.
* The two parts of the title have Chinese etymologies, from which the Sino-Korean reading is derived.
* The reference Wadley (1987) was misrepresented.
* The original text was written in Chinese; the name Wangjing is explained in a note.
* The text consists of Chinese characters, not Chinese pronunciations.
* The Lee Youk-haw reference does not contain the source text it was cited for.
* "Old Mandarin" only relates to the earliest part of the period covered by these texts.
* The Lee Yong-gil reference does not appear to say that the former existence of a Japanese translation is disputed.
Kanguole 10:30, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes
Talk:Hwasong-7

message: Today, I removed a line about North Korea having >800 nuclear weapons (that would mean it would be the 3rd largest arsenal on earth), aimed at the Japanese home islands, and South Korea.
Quote:
North Korea is currently aiming 600 Huasong 6 (improved scud) missiles at South Korea and 200 Rodong-1 missiles at Japan. Rodong-1 can strike 90% of the Japanese mainland, including Tokyo.
This has been removed because it is not sourced. 70.126.216.230 (talk) 21:50, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: I removed something...

message: "North Korea has not signed the chemical weapon treaties, so the warheads could be filled with chemical, biological, or nuclear material."
:This material is not referenced, in fact Wikipedia's own information on the Geneva Protocol indicates that North Korea has ratified the Geneva Protocol which bans the use of chemical weapons (albeit with several "retribution" withdrawal reservations.)  Also according to Wikipedia, South Korea has withdrawn "as regards bacteriological and toxin agents." I'm not sure if the North could use these weapons on the South (without violating their commitment) based on the withdrawal, but as of now it seems to me to be "uncertain" at best.  As such, I've removed the phrase.  161.32.217.30 (talk) 05:59, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: North Korea's signing of Geneva Protocol/non-use of Chemical Weapons

message: Can I ask on the relevance of the line, "Some theorize the current nuclear standoff is because Kim Jong Ill has Nodong (no dong at all)."
220.255.114.141 17:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, it's a bad joke? Thunderbunny 21:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "No dong at all"

message: Can somebody translate R/Nodong?  Ho Jon get lei'd 11:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Whodong?

message: The appropriate infobox is  -MBK004 20:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox?

message: Why is the spelling "Rodong" used here? As "Nodong" is not a North Korean designation, but a western, there is no point in using the North Korean transliteration, as North Korea simply does not use the Nodong/Rodong designation at all. --GDK (talk) 11:09, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rodong ?
Talk:Mashimaro

message: I would really appreciate it if a good pic were included in the article itself, rather than me having to click one of the external links to scavenge for one. 134.114.231.38 07:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A pic is needed 

message: Title of page didn't even make sense.  There's only one Mashimaro, and Ichigo Mashimaro can be easily diferentiated by typing ichigo before mashimaro.  The page for this character belongs here, not having to share with anyoneBethereds 16:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: moved page

message: What century? Tjobrien.seoul (talk) 10:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates are needed.
Talk:Lee Byung-chul

message: erased a comment that had nothing to do with the subject of the article but with the company he founded  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.160.106.180 (talk) 06:23, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled-
Talk:Lee Sa-bi

message: I removed "Lee Sa-bi Comes Home", The Chosun Ilbo, January 28, 2004., because it 404s.
Anyone who finds it, add it again. 94.66.161.39 (talk) 21:01, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hong Myung-bo

message: The first Korean player to 'do so'? Play four consecutive world cups? That might need clarification. Bz2 16:30, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What about Hwang Sun-Hong? Well he did get injured a lot. mirageinred 00:16, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Seol Ki-hyeon

message: Ki-Hyeon seems to be more common.  -- Visviva 06:20, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 
Talk:Clerks (film)

message: In the original cut of Clerks,Dante is shot and killed (as stated in the main article).Now the question is : How would things be without Dante?What would Randal's reaction be?More importantly,how different would Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back and Clerks II be? - R.G. 16:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: None of that really matters to Wikipedia because it's all speculation and POV. Try imdb's message board for that type of discussion. 204.115.253.51 18:48, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Because unsourced speculation is considered original research and is not appropriate for inclusion on Wikipedia.  DP76764 (Talk) 22:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dante is Dead 

message: I've removed the following line from the "Reception" paragraph:
"The videotape of this film became one of the most stolen video tapes in America."
Non-cited, of course, and I doubt it ever can be cited, but it sounds like someone has just put it in there for giggles or as an experiment to show how easy it is to insert false information into Wikipedia. I'm sure it violates something else, but I don't know all the acronyms you people use these days.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by James.Denholm (talk • contribs) 05:17, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This very talk page lists the original source for that claim: http://web.archive.org/web/20070703055616/http://www.courierpress.com/news/2006/jul/20/clerks-ii-slackers-move-to-new-level/ 27.96.199.20 (talk) 11:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sex, lies, and stolen videotapes. 

message: What was the film shot on, I assume 16 mm? Or in fact Betamax? Thanks, Maikel (talk) 14:32, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material 

message: The article states the rating is only due to the language uses in the movie and even goes so far as to claim that there is no nudity in the film. This is not true. In the "Jizz Mopped" scene, Randal flips over a pornographic magazine to the customer ans you can clearly see a very explicit close-up shot of a female's genitals. 84.160.91.155 (talk) 18:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating/Nudity
Talk:Korean count word

message: Can somebody explain where the count words are placed with respect to particles?  For example, with 이/가 is it
종이 한장이 있어요
종이가 한장 있어요
Jettabebetta 03:38, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally the first; the counter is attached to the thing it counts.  You *could*, I think, also say 종이는 한장이 있어요, but few would bother.  -- Visviva 04:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Particles

message: This article, as compared to its Chinese and Japanese equivalents, seems rather disorganised and incomplete. Later today I'm gonna try to copy some of the chart codes from the Japanese article and try to put it together in that. I'm also gonna recommend that we put up - just due to possible interest from speakers/learners of Japanese/Chinese - the Chinese characters for these count words.
Thoughts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.136.224.109 (talk) 05:29, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-Korean speaker and measure/count(er) word enthusiast here
Talk:Korean Confederation of Trade Unions

message: Just leaving a note the current version of the article cannot be regarded as neutral.  Deeper problem is the article needs significant expansion.--Goldsztajn (talk) 03:32, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Korea Standard Time

message: Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 16:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: I propose that Time in South Korea be merged into Korea Standard Time. They are so closely related, I cannot see the purpose of having separate articles. I am making a similar proposal in regards to the similar North Korea articles Time in North Korea and Pyongyang Time also. The discussion for that proposal is here. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 06:16, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the plan to merge the article. The article's a stub, and probably because there's not much to say on the topic. I'm not sure how it was considered notable at all. Does anyone object?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mysterious Gopher (talk • contribs) 01:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: In regards to the North Korea case, someone suggested that "Time in North Korea" should be the title that is kept, as a "Time in X" exists for all countries. I have already performed the NK merge, so I will do this one now. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 02:19, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Korea Defense Service Medal

message: Ron Paul's official website does not mention him serving in Korea.  Jamie Farr's fan website quotes him as saying his friends being shipped off to Korea, but does not mention his service there.  Well, I was there, I was there!  And I can document it.  So put my name in the article!! --S. Rich 14:11, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: delete undocumented recipients
Talk:Cheoljong of Joseon

message: When Cheoljong died, he was 33, and I have resources, except it is a book. 161.130.178.159 (talk) 02:33, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  33 
Talk:Mauzac (grape)

message: This entry is a cut & paste from Anthony Hawkins grape glossary at http://www.stratsplace.com/hawkins/wgg.html#mauzac
Anthony says - 
MAUZAC: 
Minor grape mainly grown in the Gaillac region southeast of Bordeaux in France. Used, with Len de l'El to create mildly sweet and sparkling white blended wines. It is also known in other regions under the local synonym name of Blanquette; (not to be confused with a similarly named grape grown in certain regions of Australia).
Pontac 16:35, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kim Jong-chul

message: Please see Talk:Kim Jong-chul/old for the old history of this article. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:40, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old history 

message: So, I'm reading around about the Kim's, and I notice that Kim Jong-un is the "heir presumptive" in his wiki, whereas it states on Kim Jong-Il's and Jong-chul's wiki that he is the successor being groomed up? I think since there is no definitive proof for either one, that all articles on the Kims be scanned to remove certainty from the contents to abstain from opinion. I'm going to suggest this on Jong-un and Jon-Il's page. In liue of the removed bits, we can simply note that there is obvious dispute between which child will receive the successorship (doubtful his daughter will because Korean traditions and customs, especially for the elitist classes, but we can't rule it out). Joshua Torelli (talk) 22:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A thought occured... 
Talk:Kim Jae-gyu

message: Why did Kim Jae-kye assassinate Park Chung Hee?  If anyone knows, please do post it in the entries for each person.
:MSTCrow 02:51, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: From a personal source, original research and all that, I was told that President Park planned to use snipers to shoot student leaders during protests, and that Kim was so appalled at the idea that he felt he had no choice but to kill Park. DOR (HK) (talk) 04:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assassination of Park Chung Hee 

message: Needs references, added tag. I looked in History of South Korea article and didn't see an obvious  source for the material. So, it needs to be added to both articles.--FloNight 13:29, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Found several sources, added to article. These and sources below may aid in expanding this article.--FloNight 15:09, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs references
Talk:Kangwon Province, North Korea

message: The redirect Kogen Province, North Korea has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Jay 💬 12:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Kogen Province, North Korea]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Kaesong Industrial Region

message: For a wide collection of images of Kaesong, just go to the Wikimedia Commons.  Of course, it's anyone's guess whether those are of the KIR or of some other part of Kaesong.  And also, this article would need to be substantially expanded before it can support an additional image.  -- Visviva 05:33, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "There are no pages or files in this category." 76.105.216.34 (talk) 05:59, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Will this actually benefit North Korea, or just give wages to the communist party (since all employees are part of the communist party). They should be taking North Koreans from everywhere BUT Pyongyang. --Hurricane Angel 07:29, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would naturally benefit every part: the workers will get higher salary by DPRK standards, the DPRK will acquire much needed foreign currency, while Hundai and others will lower production costs.
It won't benefit anyone since NK is trying to extort any firm stupid enough to invest any money at all in a corrupt Stalinist police state. The whole idea is crashing and burning as this article points out.50.10.99.70 (talk) 23:44, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Employees 

message: From reading Wikipedia, I get the impression that the Pyongbu Line terminates (for practical purposes) at Kaesong Station and that Sonha Station, Pongdong Station and Panmun Station are (for practical purposes) on the Gyeongui Line to South Korea. Can anyone confirm this? Biscuittin (talk) 09:03, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rail transport 

message: Seems unlikely it didnt draw criticism.82.171.225.84 (talk) 21:28, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably such a given for everything to do with NK that it would be redundant to mention it here. 72.28.82.250 (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No criticism? 

message: The given area of 66 km² seems to be wrong. Compare this with the area of 9200 km² of the province North Hwanghae Province(firectly north of Kaesong). In French wikioedia the 66 km² refer only to the Industrial Park, not the Industrial Region.Torsch (talk) 21:33, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area probably wrong
Talk:Juche Tower

message: "365 × 70, one for each day of Kim Il Sung's life, excluding supplementary days". What is a "supplementary day"? --User:Taejo|대조 14:46, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think this refers to February 29? Muad 21:07, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Because they don't use it themselves. Have a look at English DPRK media, where you are likely to find the spelling ‹Juche›. I suspect the DPRK is far less consistent in its romanisations than the Republic of Korea. If an entity claims to use a specific system, it does not mean it actually does. Also remember that many romanisations that coincide with the new South Korean rules have been around before 2000, for example the spelling ‹Seoul›, which originated as SE+OUL but may now be interpreted as SEO+UL. Wikipeditor 17:43, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chimecho

message: Since Chimecho is the last Pokemon programmed in the third generation, and the chances of obtaining one are slim, couldn't it be hinted that Chimecho was supposed to be in the fourth generation (where they are common), But was tacked onto the third gen at the very last second? I know Wikipedia doesn't make conclusions without actual proof, but it still seems like something worth looking into. 68.112.254.106 21:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last in 3rd gen programming?
Talk:Pneumatic filter

message: I disagree with the deletion of this page.  It not only has the possibility of expanding, but it is a completely valid topic that does not seem to already have an article. -Frazzydee 17:27, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: seems to be the same topic--137.205.174.41 (talk) 15:53, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  air vs pneumatic filter