Talk:Netizen

message: I think this entry should be taken off the list of ethnic groups...I don't see "netizens" as a proper ethnic group, more like a cultural group.
Vinomcobra- I agree.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.38.71 (talk) 01:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In South Korea, Netizen often refers to conservative, (often male) computer users who use the internet as a way to make anonymous attacks on people who do not share their social values. An example being the threat to launch cyber attacks on the Seoul Scene website, unless it removed certain content deemed to be offensive to Korean sensibilities.
I removed above paragraph because it is false. If someone disagrees, please provide a source. --Acepectif 19:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed paragraph about South Korean netizens 

message: "http://www.netizen.co.uk is also a website design and development company based in the UK."
I don't think this section is relevant to the article or context; a rather cheap attempt to direct traffic to their company's website. Surely they can create their own wikipedia page if needed?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.111.51.101 (talk) 11:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Netizen uk business? 

message: The whole Description section sounds weird, awkward, kinda like it's somthing that would be writen in the term of agreement of a site, or in some sort of handbook you get when you try to join this exclusive group of people, or in a plaque under a statue of some important representative of the group or somthing... --TiagoTiago (talk) 09:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously? 

message: Why does File:Netizen.jpg appear in the article? It adds no value to the article and it looks like a company logo. Is there a company called "Netizen" trying to benefit from this? (WP Editor 2011 (talk) 11:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is that picture there? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Netizen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150628212148/http://en.rsf.org/nawaat-reporters-without-borders-11-03-2011%2C39776.html to https://en.rsf.org/nawaat-reporters-without-borders-11-03-2011%2C39776.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150421213301/http://en.rsf.org/netizen-prize-2012-27-02-2012%2C41938.html to https://en.rsf.org/netizen-prize-2012-27-02-2012%2C41938.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Noticed that the block quotes were mostly descriptions on how to distinguish a Neitzen from a regular "Ïnternet user". Summarised into a few sentences instead of having to use too many block quotes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by KyleA94 (talk • contribs) 09:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed Quotations from Micheal and Ronda Hauben to Determing factor 

message: This article is extremely poorly worded with many grammatical errors. The whole description section, especially the part about “lurkers” is just clumsy. I think this article should be unlocked for editing Slogmire (talk) 15:36, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very poorly worded article