Talk:List of Code Geass episodes

message: The official Code Geass trading cards have been released (or at least the first round/pack thereof, anyways), and one of the cards has the translation of episode 1 (stage 1) as On The Day The Demon Prince was Born. Should the fan-translated titles be changed to whatever the trading cards say in the future? See the episode 1 card   -Atashi 00:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The English dub which has just premiered on Adult Swim apparently subtitles it as "The Day a New Demon was Born". That seems to be the newest official English translation. Juancarlos2004 (talk) 18:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title for Episode 1

message: Tricky. Ep. 11 offers two interpretations to the viewer:
# C.C.'s real name is plink, which is definitly non-human, hinting she may be some kind of spirit of nature, perhaps some nordic deity, ice fairy, whatever
# C.C.'s real name is something else, but just as we hear it or hear Lelouch saying it, at the same time a drop from a stalagtite hits the water surface and covers it.
Hmm.. as I don't see anyone uttering her name first, I bet it is plink. 
And a side note: I wish Kallen was written as Karen and Lelouch as Lelouche because that would be better English and French. But if the series creators stick to those mistakes we probably have to stick to them as well.
--Marc van Woerkom 22:19, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We'll see. :-) And now I remember where I last time heard a funny name, it was Splash, where the name of the mermaid was useful to break glass as well. --Marc van Woerkom 11:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Ok, with Lelouch I am wrong it seems. Where is Kallen used as name? --Marc van Woerkom 11:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kallen_Esperian It's an Irish name, though originally a boy's name. Calaschysm 18:06, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Kallen was also how it was spelled in roman letters on a poster iirc aha, so I suppose it is canon now. Hoenstly, I would have preffered it to be Karen myself, but there you have it. Anonymous 01:57, 09 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: C.C.'s real name

message: IMHO many of the short summaries aren't really short and some give too much away of the episode's plot. 
Are there any Wikipedia guidelines dealing with this? What are your opinions? --Marc van Woerkom 14:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:FICTION states "Plot summaries should be kept reasonably short, as the point of Wikipedia is to describe the works, not simply summarize them. ", so I completely agree that summaries should be kept reasonably short and simple. It also helps organize the article in a much more suitable way, in my opinion. ···巌流? · Talk to Ganryuu 16:59, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Partial Agree.  For separate articles per episode, the summaries may as well be on the scope of Star Trek the Next Generation.  It's possible to write up episode summaries in 3 sentences or less.  Of course, some may require longer - but not many.  For a model list, just look at List of Oh My Goddess episodes. KyuuA4 21:44, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short Summary Guidelines 

message: We all know they refer to the same person.  The summaries must be as condensed as possible.  To save space, use one reference or the other, but not both in the same sentence. KyuuA4 17:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Zero vs Lerouch

message: I see summaries for several episodes that have not yet aired, how is this possible?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.108.241.160 (talk) 22:18, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The summaries are from Newtype, along with the episode titles. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 22:27, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  episode summary on episodes that have not yet aired? 

message: What happened to Stage 9.33?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.47.135.30 (talk) 03:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Picture Drama? 

message: A video has surfaced that I at first thought to be fan-made: an opening to Code Geass as Zetsubou Billy by "Maximum the Hormone". However, there are too many small things in the video for it to be fake, such as the SUNRISE logo towards the end of the video and the final picture that was clearly drawn by the creators themselves. Is it fake or is it really another opening theme?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.255.6.135 (talk) 03:32, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's fake. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 04:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Opening Theme? 

message: The summary for episode 22 makes very little sense, could anybody word it clearer? --rpman24 17:07, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would if I could. The summary it's derived from is incredibly vague. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 22:46, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode 22 summary

message: Why is the acronym for Nina's bomb spelled like that even though the acronym within the episode summary would refer to it as FLEIA? NinjaRooster (talk) 10:15, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Go to the code geass talk page.Westrim (talk) 10:20, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: F.L.E.I.J.A.?

message: The summary states that Suzaku had killed 35 million people. Wasn't it just over 10 million with 25 million or more casualties? ~ Hyakurei (talk) 14:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode 19 summary: Suzaku 

message: I was just wondering why the insert songs for Code Geass was not mentioned.Shouldn't we put the insert songs info to make it more complete?
:Too trivial. It's a matter for soundtracks and such. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 06:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Code Geass Music

message: Three days grace period should be honored for synopsis, english translation of episode names should be delayed as well. (because they are quite descriptive.)
I wonder if there is a spoiler tag.Raghar (talk) 23:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't like it, don't read it. Wikipedia doesn't censor spoilers. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 23:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Just as Trust not the Penguin said, Wikipedia does not censor spoilers. Please refer to: Wikipedia:Spoiler — ElliottB (talk) 00:02, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avoid spoilers for unrelased episodes. 

message: The article heavily rely on Japanese sources. Is it possible to use some English language source? Thanks. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 06:48, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not when they don't exist. You'll find a lot of animes rely on Japanese sources. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 06:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Particularly those that aren't entirely released in English, like all of R2 and some of the first season. the_one092001 (talk) 19:05, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  English language source 

message: Could an admin. please semi protect this page? see the history for details. Westrim (talk) 18:46, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't edit it, but registered editors can. It will be updated regardless of the protection. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 23:20, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Honestly, if you want to edit Wikipedia, why don't you register and participate in the community? Pages are protected against unwarranted, incorrect edits by non-registered and newly registered users. This is done to prevent spam, misinformation, and attacks. ElliottB (talk) 20:56, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Please, watch your tone and language. I've removed your curse word. I am simply saying that you should register up if you want to edit semi-protected pages and read Wikipedia's guidelines. ElliottB (talk) 23:31, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

text: If you re-read my post, you'll see "Pages are protected against unwarranted, incorrect edits by non-registered and newly registered users." I do not mean your edits are incorrect, but that this is why the system is the way it is. Also, please read the policies and guidelines for Wikipedia (Such as Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:Edit_war, and Wikipedia:No_personal_attacks) . Also, as a new registered user, just wait until you have access to different editing roles. Additionally please sign your posts in (~~~~) talk pages. (I added yours based on Page History) I consider this discussion closed. Elliott B (T | C) 02:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

text: All right, I think I removed the block. I may have just deleted the notification that it was there, though. Westrim (talk) 23:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war 

message: Where do these Code Geass cards come from? Are there any scans? - plau (talk) 11:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Code Geass Cards 

message: Is it just me, or did Adult Swim put this show on hiatus? I sat down to watch it the other night and: nothing (but crap). Anyone else notice? Sirius85 (talk) 01:31, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was actually on at 5 AM. Yes, we know. Westrim (talk) 01:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hiatus?

message: Should we include a manga chapter of Nightmare of Nunnally in this?SilentmanX (talk) 14:47, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean? In what and where? Westrim (talk) 19:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

text: The answer is no. This is episodes, not chapters. — Trust not the Penguin (T | C) 22:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nightmare of Nunnally Chapters

message: I'm sure that's just pure speculation. Shouldn't it be changed back to what it originally was? And isn't the summary for episode 25 a bit too long? - plau (talk) 00:12, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charles leaving his Code 

message: According to this page and adultswim.com, Code Geass season 2 episode 1 is supposed to Air tonight (actually tomorrow morning), November 1st (or 2nd, technically) at 3:00 in the morning for Mountain Standard Time. Today the time moved back to Standard Time, but I live in Arizona, which doesn't change it's time for DST and flips back and forth between Pacific and Mountain Times. 
I'm getting a little off topic, but I've checked my program guide on the satellite network I'm with and it says that Code Geass is NOT airing tonight AT ALL. I'm wondering if this is a scheduling error made by my satellite provider or attributed to the fact that Arizona is "weird" and doesn't move time back and forth so Adult Swim is skipping an hour of programming (most inconveniently Code Geass's block) to make up for the time difference. The reason why I'm wondering and asking you guys is because I usually record the show on my VCR (yes, I'm retro) so I don't have to stay up that late. 
Anyone know what's up? --71.38.43.189 (talk) 02:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Code Geass definitely aired yesterday morning, and I record it on my DVR so I don't have to stay up so late either. =) BTW, did it air last week? My DVR didn't record either Code Geass or Moribito (which AS restarted yesterday for some reason) (actually, strike that, there's only 25 episodes in Season 1 (ignoring specials), so I didn't miss anything after all ^_^ ). —Dinoguy1000 19:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air dates 

message: I really wish people would stop fucking around with the dates for new episode airings. I'm tired of getting excited and then feeling disappointment.
:Blame Adult Swim. They really like to screw around with their schedule, and since they basically gave up on anime after people started wanting more "gold" like Tim and Eric or Xavier... 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 18:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Somebody needs to go back and change the US airdates back to their original first run. There is no need to change them to the new run just because AS decided to rewind back to the beginning of the season. Andyross (talk) 15:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. 「ダイノガイ千？！」(Dinoguy1000) 20:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. Air Dates 

message: At the beginning of "Sky of Damocles", the episode title sequence called it "Grip of Damocles". Should it be changed? 71.120.145.92 (talk) 17:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sky of Damocles" 

message: There were suppose to be an audio drama episode for the season 2 series. I know because I've heard one in Youtube, so why has it been not added? SilentmanX (talk) 00:20, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Audio Dramas for R2 

message: I'm going to turn Code Geass episodes into a directory link and split the seasons and OVA off. So this episode list will list the sublist for Lelouch of the Rebellion (My prototype here), R2, then Akito. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 02:01, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamping articles 2013 

message: I sent out a third opinion request.
Gohan13 argues the Individual OVA should come before the Akito series due to the release date. I argue notability/significance should come first. Gohan's example would be similar to shoving the anthology media releases of Rozen Maiden into the manga section where the main works and its derivatives belong.
Gohan13 also argues the DVD compilation should be added to the list. I say it should be treated as a volume release and remain in their respective articles. Whatever input will be binding for the article. Thanks. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 01:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I was hoping to skip a few steps to speed up the process, which I've done before, because this discussion is completely predictable. Both sides don't agree, never will agree, and will require outside intervention at some point. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 23:17, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well this can't be posted in any form of dispute resolution until discussion takes place here. The other editor seems to be new so consider warning him about edit warring or 3RR, and invite him here (WP:DISCFAIL is a good essay regarding this). Or why don't try to get some other interested editor (maybe from WikiProject Anime) to take part here? Sincerely, Ugog Nizdast (talk) 12:52, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure Organization discussion