lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rishab Aiyer Ghosh

message: Does anyone know what SSRC or POSA stand for!?! —The-thing (Talk) (Stuff I did) 20:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Like many such bio-stubs, this article would benefit tremendously from the addition of a photograph of the subject. Rishab is an Free and Open Source Software person, and is sure to have such a photo available under a suitable license. --Achitnis 19:14, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo? 

message: When I last met Rishab, he had obtained Dutch nationality - which makes traveling a lot easier for someone living in Europe. Rbakels (talk) 10:28, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The info box mentions Rishab's nationality as Dutch but the article mentioned him as an Indian Journalist. I removed this "Indian" from the article to correct this discrepancy. Though I'm not sure if it is the best way to do it.  
Hargup (talk) 07:55, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch
Talk:Irene Kampen

message: Isn't this a stub?  Baeritone 20:18, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Soil/Categories

message: Wikipedia CatScan -- Paleorthid 17:57, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tools 

message: Here is a good way to highlight the most relevant category:

Paleorthid 13:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: This table covers the heirarchical category structure.
General sub fields within Soil science
Pedology | Edaphology | Soil biology | Soil chemistry | Soil physics | Soil scientists
General subfields within Pedology
Paleopedology | Pedogenesis | Pedometrics | Soil classification | Soil morphology
General subfields within Edaphology
Environmental soil science | Agricultural soil science
Paleorthid 16:53, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As time goes on, the above statement  seems to be losing its currency: A periodic google search for the terms edaphology and edaphologist shows a growing trend, indicating that edaphology is moving into common usage.
Shouldn't :Category:Soil mechanics be a subcategory of :Category:Soil science? Thanks. Ufwuct 21:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it was in the soil science category heirarchy, it would by under soil physics.  There overlap between soil science and engineering within soil mechanics, however my sense of it is that common usage places it with engineering. -- Paleorthid 06:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hierarchical structure
Talk:Marcel Theroux

message: He's quite foxy actually.  Can I say that on here? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.40.56.186 (talk • contribs) 21:20, April 4, 2006  (UTC)
It depends if you are a woman or a man :p This comment was posted by Russiandragon @ 03.07.07
Seriously now: the main piece states that he spoke almost fluent Russian... I would say he spoke it well. I mean his pronunciation was very so so but his grasp of the vocabulary was pretty good! This comment was posted by Russiandragon @ 03.07.07
Saw him last night (in Rostov-on-Don) and my curiosity to come here was raised by him speaking a bit of Russian. Did I hear right was my query. It is so important that we have people who speak the language because it is the key to understanding. Another theatre of animosities is now opened up near Venezuela to reign them in. The US will establish a 'temporary' military base near the border of Columbia, Peru, and Brazil and in addition to the ME, Afghanistan, and North Korea these many war clouds are obviously concerning. 
Please keep up reporting on Russia, Marcel Theroux. They often frighten us with talk that war is inevitable. 2001:8003:A0AC:6200:5903:B792:CC23:612B (talk) 05:31, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is Marcel the middle son? Paul Theroux's own website says "his first son Marcel" was born in 1968. Straitgate (talk) 05:18, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle son?
Talk:Riparian strips

message: i have only seen this in the technical literature as "riparian zone". is this a regional thing?
Anlace 20:26, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: zone or strip

message: this merger is logical. both articles address the same point. riparian is an adjective and should not be the surviving name. i would propose the surviving name be Riparian zone...what do others think? Anlace 20:31, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First up, I agree that "riparian" is an adjective and should not be the title of the page. Further, to me, a riparian zone is the ecotone (ecological interface) between a water course and land. It makes no assumption about what is actually living there. Does "riparian strip" imply there is a certain quantity of higher plants growing? I don't really use the  term enough to know. If the implication is absent of weak, I agree with the merger, and the final page being "riparian zone". Cheers, Daniel Collins 20:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merger
Wikipedia talk:Interpret all rules

message: (previously) Unwritten rule:
No one actually is supposed to be making guidelines.
Guidelines are supposed to be exposed by finding courses of action on the wiki that happen to be benificial. They are written down by folks who think it might be useful to describe them to all. 
(this is the root of "wikipedia rules are descriptive, not prescriptive")
(note: Unwritten rules are just there. No one ever wrote them down, but we notice that wierd things happen when we break them.)
-- Kim Bruning 20:27, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed a complete load of bollocks that says you mustn't deliberately ignore rules. --TS 21:14, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an essay. It's allowed to be ah "bollocks".©Geni 23:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed some bollocks
Talk:American Civil Liberties Union v. Ashcroft (2004)

message: Is not this case supposed to be titled Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union? --IVI Auric 08:51, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Did Ashcroft take the case to the USSC?  'Cos if not, surely the 90 day delay granted by Justice Marreo would have run out by now. --David.Mestel 20:52, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Appeal

message: "The government was expected to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court, and until the district court ruling is reviewed, the secrecy procedures of the NSL remain in place."
this is unclear. does this mean the govt could choose not to appeal it and magically keep the secrecy in place forever? is this why there's been no update? --dan (talk) 17:53, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: pending review

message: * http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysnative/RDpcT3BpbnNcT1BOXDA3LTQ5NDMtY3Zfb3BuLnBkZg==/07-4943-cv_opn.pdf
THF (talk) 01:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: update

message: This article needs to be merged with Doe v. Gonzales.  That article should have been renamed Doe v. Mukasey, but now needs to be renamed Doe v. Holder.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.246.152.8 (talk) 21:09, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The ISP and the person name is now available.
http://www.aclu.org/national-security/national-security-letter-recipient-can-speak-out-first-time-fbi-demanded-customer-  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.136.40 (talk) 19:32, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New Information

message: What is the lawsuit about? The lead doesn't even mention it... 143.138.26.178 (talk) 04:28, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: What?

message: move - change name to Doe v. Holder? Accotink2 talk 15:09, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Move?

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:02, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Geli Ali Beg Waterfall

message: Not every articl related to "Kurdistan" needs a category tag. For a complete list of articles which link to Kurdistan, navigate to Kurdistan and click "What links here". --Uncle Ed 20:39, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Robert H. Tuttle

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 18:13, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Interesting to hear an interview on the BBC Radio4 'Today' programme today (23 Dec 08) in which Tuttle seemed to be astonishingly partisan in favour of Republican presidents - of course he must always represent the current US government, but why speak on behalf of Reagan's administration as well?
I will be interested to see whether he remains in post under the new administration.--Ndaisley (talk) 08:26, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see I was naive and that he would be a political appointment anyway, so unlikely to hang around! --Ndaisley (talk) 08:40, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Partisan Ambassador? 

message: I'm going to change the title of the sub topic to "Controversy over congestion fee" because as far as I can tell that is more accurate. --72.183.246.101 (talk) 03:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy Over Parking tickets 

message: How can the subject of this article be married to the former Maria Denise Hummer? What does "the former" mean? The Average Wikipedian (talk) 15:31, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Married to the former Maria Denise Hummer' 
Talk:Mount Waialeale

message: I removed the okinas from this article to increase readability and so that mentions of "Waialeale" matched the title and the external links, none of which had the okina version of the word. Erudy 21:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Okinas

message: Since both spellings of Waialeale are correct and the article is in the English Language, I removed the okinas that someone placed in my edits (Of course, most folks don't know an okina from Okinawa). Also, the USGS does not append Mount to Waialeale (and of course the Hawaiians never used the word so it couldn't even be Mount Wai'ale'ale in the Hawaiian Language), I have removed "Mount" that some person placed into my posts. Volcantrek8 (talk) 19:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Okinas
Talk:Milwaukeeland

message: It has been suggested that "Milwaukeeland" might be the same as "Milwaukee".  My understanding, however, is that "Milwaukeeland" has a greater scope than just Milwaukee proper, arguably including not only Milwaukee itself but also the surrounding counties.  The term does seem to be in the greatest use by people from Chicago, who are used to referring to the greater Chicago area, including the surrounding counties, as Chicagoland.  To best expand the "Milwaukeeland" article, additional information needs to be added defining the scope of Milwaukeeland, as well as the history behind the origin and usage of the term.
Albanaco 20:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Milwaukeeland vs Milwaukee
Talk:Squawk

message: This bit: 
Squawk can also refer to another aviation-related meaning, concerning maintenance problems, such as: "The plane has three squawks." - where there are three problems that require repair or attention.
I have never ever heard of this term being used like this before and I work within aviation (air traffic control). I'd say that if there are no external sources to this claim it should be removed. 91.125.166.199 (talk) 19:30, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Radio Active (New Zealand)

message: The Sweedish one should be moved to Radio Active (Sweeden) Htaccess 21:01, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed. --Midnighttonight 07:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think the second paragraph is biased because of the strong positive language used.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.252.231.154 (talk) 01:21, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Guanaco, MarkSweep, et al/Workshop

message: I am amused that Tony Sidaway would literally run away from an argument, but it does beg the question: who is to comment in the Comments by parties section? StrangerInParadise 21:05, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is to comment in the '''Comments by parties''' section?
Talk:Jungle Music

message: In the UK, Jungle was also the genre that drum&bass and it's various styles evolved from, although this point is contended by drum&bass fans from the USA.
how many times does this have to be discussed.  dnb didn't evolve from jungle cause they're the same fscking thing.  the two terms have been used interchangably since 1993!  i hate typical two step drum and bass and love cut up breakbeats but the fact remains that both can be called jungle or drum and bass. 
In this underground scene drum&bass is frowned as it is seen as being to mainstream and attracting a chav crowd
this quote right here gives it away that you're just using the term drum and bass to signify the popular shit and the term jungle to signify a more underground sound.  i know a lot of fans of ragga jungle don't like typical dnb styles and thus they want to enfoce a division between jungle and dnb, but the fact remains that there is nothing that really makes one drum and bass and one jungle.
--Frantik 21:07, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it's clear that this arguement is never going to go away, i tried to make the page less pov.  perhaps there needs to be a jungle vs dnb section on this page too?  --Frantik 21:51, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  not this bs again! 

message: Shouldn't the redirect go from this page to Jungle music, and not the other way around?  --Frantik 18:47, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the information over --Frantik 03:04, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title should be "Jungle music" not "Jungle Music"
Talk:List of J-Pop artists:O

message: Ohguro Maki's name is romanized officially with an "h" it must be kept this way because that is how it appears on her goods when it is romanized, thus people will search for her officially romanized "Ohguro" name, and probably never Oguro. Please do not tamper with it. -- NatsukiGirl\talk 21:11, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hinduism and Sikhism

message: This article is alarmingly misleading.  The last two lines of the introduction manipulate information to convey what is incorrect.  For example, the footnote for "intermarriage between Hindus and Sikhs has been considered acceptable" cites the quote "A Sikh's daughter must be married to a Sikh."  Also, the last line's reference sources are not valid!  The 2nd source for it, a page about a Hindu shrine, mentions one important Sikh visitor.  Nothing on the sources even imply that Hindus and Sikhs both visit each site proportionally.  I will clarify the inaccuracies here; if you have a reason to change then respond first please. Mar de Sin Speak up! 01:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Misleading article 

message: The user Azuredivay had raised objections that many sections under Differences are ignoring WP:OR. The reason given by him was that these sections don't contain common sources which mentions the stance of both religions on various points like Pilgrimage, Fasting, Idol worship etc. He had removed some of the sections because of that. So, I will keep on adding such sources in various sections so that they no longer ignore WP:OR guideline. I will also keeping on mentioning those sources in this section of talk page so that any other user, who has the same concerns, can refer to this section. 
For eg: today I have made changes in Idol Worship section so that it no longer ignores WP:OR. The common source for that is the following book:
https://archive.org/stream/ACompleteGuideToSikhism/#page/n109
Other supporting sources have also been kept as just common source is sometimes not enough to mention all the details. For eg: the above common source doesn't mentions that all Hindus don't worship idols so other sources have to be used to clarify that.  Jasksingh (talk) 18:53, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences sections ignoring [[WP:OR]] 

message: This is very poorly sourced and almost all of the sources are about the target. TrangaBellam (talk) 13:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Rama in Sikhism]] into [[Hinduism and Sikhism]] 

message: The first paragraph of "Historical links" & opening lines of "Beliefs" are mentioning about the same thing i.e. historical links. So, it would be better to merge them and keep it under "Links" section. Links section can have two subsections - "Ideological" and "Struggle against Mughals". Beliefs section can straightaway start from "Concept of God". Others please suggest. If anybody has objection then we can discuss it on this talk page otherwise I will make the changes after few days. Jasksingh (talk) 13:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Improvement
Talk:Bias in South Asian Studies

message: fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 13:15, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Very funny. A biased anti-bias bias from Hindutva, isn't it? My dear Indian friend (and I don't need to see History Page to guess your nationality), a heap of outrageous accusations and insults cannot be balanced by adding 'alleged...' 'supposed...' etc I am not going to edit it, not at all. Let it stand as it is as a witness to your misplaced nationalistic bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.199.22.167 (talk • contribs) 
This whole article reads like a hilarious parody of an Indian screaming "racist bigot imperialist Nazi" at anyone who feels that India is a nation like any other, or Hinduism is a religion like any other. Wikipedia is not a soapbox, take this stuff elsewhere. dab (ᛏ) 17:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: Please don't make personal attacks. Comment on content and how to improve it, not on the contributor. Personal attacks will rarely help you make a point; they hurt the Wikipedia community and deter users from helping create a good encyclopedia.
:in case you are referring to me, I am commenting on content. I wouldn't know how to attack you personally, since I have no idea who you are (you make people look at the edit history even to see your username, please sign your posts). You may be a nice guy (or gal), your article is fascinating, but it is the fascination of a trainwreck, or of somebody hitting himself over the head repeatedly with a live penguin. dab (ᛏ) 07:21, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be better to be able to discuss the subject in only one single article. Otherwise, parts of it would have to be discussed in separate articles like Indology, South Asian Studies, Colonialism, East India Company, etc. But maybe the article title could be changed. ("Indology" is also not as broadly defined as "South Asian Studies".) The subject and the article are big enough to merit their own article. Entire books have been written on some aspect or another of this, for example Chakrabartis "Colonial Indology".  --Sendrin 22:35, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't really care anymore if the article is deleted or not. I understand some (not all) of the arguments that the article should better be merged into Indology, or at least until there is more material. A problem is that the Indology/South Asian Studies article is a stub, and the criticism section would IMO overwhelm that article. (Which is unfair to Indology, the criticism is an important part, but as long as Indology is a stub that section would overwhelm the rest).  Because of this a separate criticism article would be the better solution, as it is done for many other pages. Wikipedia has articles on criticism of scientology, islam, many smaller sects and about many other things, so another criticism article is not a big deal. Maybe a better title would be Criticisms of South Asian Studies. --Sendrin 21:32, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NPA]]
Talk:Clearway

message: We have clearways in the UK as well, so they're not just an Australian thing. I'll try to find enough detail to add a section. Loganberry (Talk) 21:17, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, no problem: for one thing, I wrote my comment a year ago and had completely forgotten about it! But as it happens I should be able to get a better photo of a clearway sign in the next week or two, and I'd be quite happy to release it as PD, so I'll upload that when I can. Loganberry (Talk) 14:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to say that I haven't forgotten about this: the weather was dreadful when I had some free time recently, but I will get a photo when I can. Loganberry (Talk) 14:48, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All right; done! It's not fantastic, but it's sharper than the older one. Loganberry (Talk) 22:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Illinois College of Optometry

message: This page's content was taken from content created for ICO's website, and this entry was created by ICO's webmaster.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Eyecare (talk • contribs) 17:18, April 4, 2006‎ (UTC)
*ICO holds the copyright, not the webmaster. Per Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, please do not use the article for advertising purposes. -AED 21:22, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI material
Talk:Jumper (computing)

message: This needs a section on jumper types (ie 2.54mm vs 2.00mm, etc). Myrdred 21:30, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on jumper types 

message: Should the sentence For example, computer CPU speed and voltage settings are often made by setting jumpers. be modified to ...were often made? In my experience this is no longer done, these settings are controlled directly from BIOS. Rob.desbois 20:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken this into account in my most recent edit of the article. Bloodshedder 23:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jumpers for CPU speed / voltage outdated? 

message: For a lot of people (I included), an explanation would be needed on how exactly we're supposed to toggle jumpers, since that one of the most important information concerning jumpers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.178.1.50 (talk) 23:09, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section needed on: HOW to toggle (strap, jumperize) a jumper?