lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Star Castle

message: I think the original bit on shield regeneration was correct. Shields regenerate when the outer one is fully destroyed. Spottedowl 18:02, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been at least 4 years since I played this, so I'll change the details. --Larsinio 18:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

message: The development of Star Castle was the subject of an article in Science 80 magazine back then. I saved the issue for years because I loved the game so much. I specifically remember the article talking about how the programming of the mines to have them follow your ship would have required increasing the amount of memory and thus the expense of the machine, and they solved this problem by instead having the mine go towards what quarter of the screen your ship was in, etc.
Wow: that's a pretty crazy optimisation that I wasn't aware of. No idea who wrote the above paragraph, but thank you for sharing. Bart.Read 22:38, 8 Feb 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science 80 

message: I don’t think that’s an original image. Aliasing from a raster display is visible in the diagonal lines and in the curve of the circles. I think that’s an emulator screen shot. 
Compare the emulator shots and the video of the real machine at https://www.arcade-museum.com/game_detail.php?game_id=9754 BrianSniffen (talk) 01:04, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raster image 

message: "In an interview, Skelly admitted that the stellar filed was made using the shape of a woman from a nude magazine".
What the hell is the above supposed to even mean? Cleblutie (talk) 09:04, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy
Talk:International arbitration

message: McIlwrath 21:40, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

message: There is a German equivalent to this page, but for some reason I cannot add it. However this might be just the result of my incompetence regarding Wikipedia so far. [Internationale Schiedsgerichtsbarkeit]
--Maximilianpower (talk) 17:58, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: There is a German equivalent

message: I was wondering about this process and the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), a list of cases illustrating the application of this would be useful in NAFTA and other treaties. One unresolved case being pertinant is the Tobacco plain packaging—investor-state arbitration (Plain cigarette packaging#Tobacco industry response) case under the 1993 Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of Hong Kong for the Promotion and Protection of Investments (Hong Kong Agreement). Paul foord (talk) 01:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The article Investor-state dispute settlement has a list - this article now links to that one. -- Paul foord (talk) 01:37, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cases 

message: Is there a sufficient distinction to warrant separate articles? I'm asking with an eye to merging:
*
*
T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)talk 06:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The same as "international commercial arbitration"?
Talk:Yule log (cake)

message: Really great entry, but I have one question.  The opening sentences says "as the name indicates," although there is no english translation mentioned.  Is a rough translation possible?  I'm assuming 'Buche' means 'log' so maybe the line could be edited to read 'roughly translated the name is 'Christmas Log,' and as that name indicates it is...'  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.212.99.11 (talk) 15:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Translation? 

message: OK, I am no expert on the matter, but the cake concept of a Yule log is not particular to Quebec and its origins go back to at least France, where, as far as I know, it is still a popular Christmas dessert. I think this article should get some major editing/revisions which I cannot provide...--132.206.150.33 18:31, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quebec only? 

message: I stayed with a French family of gastronomes for Christmas 1980, and they were sticklers for tradition. One of these was Bûche de Noël as the end of midnight supper-- made with a marron (chestnut) filling. They laughed at my American ignorance in expecting chocolate based on its appearance. This is completely different from what the English call a Swiss role.It's true the Swiss and Belgians consume chocolate at every opportunity, and the French put it in petit pain, but I was told that it's not part of the veille de Noël tradition. Bookjacket (talk) 05:47, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't the traditional filling not chocolate but chestnut? 

message: I've removed this sentence:
:In the United Kingdom, and many English speaking Commonwealth countries, this Buche de Noel or Yulelog is usually called a chocolate Swiss Roll or a chocolate log.
There is no reference cited, and my observation is that there are large numbers of products called yule logs on sale in the UK. StephenDawson (talk) 10:38, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK and English-speaking Commonwealth 

message: Why does this article just say that this dish is served in France near Christmas? There is a dish which resembles this called a "chocolate log" or "Christmas log" which gets served in the United Kingdom near Christmas and the icing may be decorated with plastic robins. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 22:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: About the opening of this article

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Bûche de Noël chocolat framboise maison.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 24, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-12-24. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:06, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Bûche de Noël chocolat framboise maison.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Gulf of Alaska

message: Does Gulf of Alaska belong to the United States?
Or  territorial waters law applies in here as well?
Cover72 16:58, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's part of the Pacific Ocean, regular territorial waters laws apply. Kmusser (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gulf of Alaska owner

message: Mixing and alphabetizing the long Kodiak Archipelago and Alexander Archipelago island lists, duplicates them but makes it even harder to find anything, or to distinguish islands not in those two archipelagos like Middleton Island. --JWB (talk) 19:07, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Island list
Talk:Betty Shabazz

message: Should the place of death be "The Bronx, New York, US" or "The Bronx, New York, New York, US"? 16:43, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh come on. Why do you need an RfC for this? Do you really want to drag it out for thirty days, with Legobot sending messages to people who either care not one bit or who would say "The Bronx, New York". Nothing more is necessary: we're not providing a postal address, and if people really don't know where New York is, they can at least click the link. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems obvious to me as well, Redrose64. You'd have to ask the two editors who are edit-warring to keep the longer, unnatural form why we need an RfC. They call me the Big Pill (talk) 21:04, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I'm puzzled too, discuss first, seek WP:DR, and maybe then go to an RFC if there's still no consensus. I don't see what's wrong with just The Bronx, New York. However, at least there would be an outside chance of understanding the reasoning as to why more specificity might be needed if anyone had bothered to discuss this first. 74.73.230.72 (talk) 18:48, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for comment: The Bronx, New York, New York
Talk:List of Pakistani musicians

message: 5 famous musicians of Pakistan 61.5.153.5 (talk) 07:12, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Alluvial fan

message: Can anyone tell me what the difference between a River delta and Alluvial fan is? If there is not a difference then perhaps the two articles should be merged? --Daleh T 07:50, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity with [[River delta]] 

message: "The deposits are usually poorly-sorted."
It would help to define "sorting" with respect to sediment. Its meaning here is unclear to the layman.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.103.193.208 (talk) 08:04, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing that out, the term is now wiki-linked to the Sorting (sediment) page, which hopefully is clear enough (the diagram helps I think). Mikenorton (talk) 19:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorting 

message: I believe it was David Dawdy who developed the alluvial fan hydraulic analysis program for Baker. It would be good to include a reference to his probabilistic approach and a link to the model. FEMA has a runtime version of the program, but I cannot find a copy of the source code (BASIC).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drdbthompson (talk • contribs) 21:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alluvial Fan Model 

message: I'm confused why the last few edits have removed the lead section and replaced it with an introduction header. Also, the rewritten introduction section now no longer has any links, and the citations there point to some biomedical essay... Should this be reverted? Gary600playsmc (talk) 13:45, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section
Talk:Gianna Jessen

message: In authenticating Gianna's story for those who doubt, the identity of Gianna's biological mother has always raised questions.  There is reliable evidence that she is dead now, though, so her anonymity isn't as necessary to protect.
The Shaver biography indicates the woman they found and information the PI/records uncovered were Tina Holder, born in California, in 1959.  Only one Tina Holder matches this information in California birth records, as does "Baby Girl Holder/Moore" being born in LA on Gianna's birthdate.
Public records and the Shaver biography show this same woman, Tina Doris Holder, married a Lewis and was in Indiana, as the Shaver biography states, after the marriage, though she returned to both California and Texas.  
A "Tina D. Lewis", going by the Twitter handle @TinaDeets, started Tweeting claiming to be Gianna's mother, providing details that do match and suggesting the biographer lied, claiming she was an alcoholic when she wasn't.  Her Tweets stop September 3, 2015.  Tina Doris Holder Lewis died September 7, 2015, and several links, including a memorial photo taken by the sister named in the biography, and a blurred photo on the linked FB page of Tina when she was younger all suggest this was the birth mother.
 Truthorconsequences22 (talk) 02:44, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:BDP and WP:BLPPRIMARY apply here. You are violating policy. Please do not use this article as a platform for violating policy; my activity as an IP editor is considerably more legitimate than yours as a WP:SPA. 2600:8800:1880:91E:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 06:15, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gianna's birth mother per admission and Shaver biography 

message: Currently the article says that Gianna weighed only 1.1 kg at birth, or 2.5 lbs.  No source is listed for this fact.
The evidence she places on her own Twitter feed, and published by Jill Staneck in her archived blog here shows Social Services documentation stating a birth weight of 1360 grams, which is 2.998 lbs.  However, given that the documentation as presented by Gianna is certainly a primary source, and some may not consider Jill Stanek's blog a reputable secondary source.
Are there guidance from the experts in how to properly source her birth weight?  Many sources that seem to meet the Wikipedia standards as "secondary sources" report she weighed "only 2 lbs", which seems to come from her 1996 Congressional testimony. Which is contradicted by the documentation she herself has provided in order to validate her story.  Should reliance on "secondary sources" as Wikipedia policy be outweighed by the inaccuracy of such secondary sources, especially when it doesn't present a "novel interpretation" of an event?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:3780:B00:BC49:DB61:5971:FEF6 (talk) 17:22, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate sourcing for Ganna's actual birth weight?
Talk:Ben Bassarab

message: Diane Hart was 100 percent wrong when she made these allagations. They were in here book in which Bassarab was proceeding to sue over but Martha Hart beat him to the punch. Hart had no choice but to pull her book as it was fictional and not fact.By doing this she kept herself out of the courthouse. Bassarab defending the charge of a Deadbeat tells anyone is welcomed to contact Maintenance Enforcement and to check his record where child maintenance was paid up too in full 2006.where it ended  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.177.66.64 (talk) 19:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deadbeat Dad false as is criminal activity 

message: In Bret Hart's book he mentioned that he met Bassarab on a funeral as well as his new wife. Does anyone have information about this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by *Treker (talk • contribs) 19:00, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remarried.  
Talk:Gerald Brisco

message: I think his appearance at WrestleMania 23 in that Eugene & Cryme Tyme segment should be noted. 89.48.250.23 15:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: He doesn't work as for the WWE right now.Dddrt (talk) 19:37, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  He Had A Series of Strokes And Is No Longer Active At The Moment 

message: Who confirmed his passing? -- Bardnet (talk) 21:19, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There's more confirmation of him being alive than him being dead. DX927 (talk) 21:37, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death
Talk:Loft Story (French TV series)

message: biabavnw-r
classic example of the french copying english culture
===Table is way too big===
Whoever made the nominations table, it's way too big. I don't know how to fix tables, but it doesn't need to be that big so someone should make it smaller.208.102.141.208 (talk) 23:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Whoever made the nominations table, it's way too big. I don't know how to fix tables, but it doesn't need to be that big so someone should make it smaller.208.102.141.208 (talk) 23:18, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Table is way too big
Talk:Don Callis

message: Isn't Don Calls credited in kayfabe with creating the APA? I remember he was brought back post-Oddities for two or three weeks on-air where he would introduce the Acolytes. Isn't this mentionable?-— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.30.46.163 (talk) 14:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  APA? 

message: This whole article could not possibly be more written by the guy himself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.19.242.63 (talk) 05:52, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-written 

message: Should we move The Don Callis Family to its own page??? Imdeadinside12 (talk) 21:54, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Don Callis Family
Talk:Silesian-American Corporation

message: The amount of anti-Bush trash in [the previous -PR] article was substantial.  Have people no shame in making Wikipedia into a laughingstock? (sigh) 67.35.150.227 19:14, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: or without arguing but there... no subject about NAZI because silesian american corporation was really working for nazi?
understood what Trading with the ennemy act means ?
Who were the ennemy ? hm... NAZI ? or what ?
So every enterprise under the Trading with the ennemy act were almost NAZI, pure logic.
Its crazy to see how people think nowadays, truly sad.
Basic facts and pure bullshit!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misterdru (talk • contribs) 13:12, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  PEOPLE like calling name as antisemitist racist when its useless
Talk:FTW Championship

message: When Chris Chetti brought this title back, what belt did he use? A new one, or the original belt?  SilentRage 11:19, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it was the real belt, Pete(Taz), I think gave it to him. TonyFreakinAlmeida 23:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The first FTW belt was made by NY indy wrestler/beltmaker Mike Vartanian. It was not an old TV title, but a brand new belt made specifically for Taz. The belt DID say television on it and have a FTW sticker covering it, but the belt specifically had Taz name engraved on the top. The belt was a modified version of the ECW TV Title at that time. The ECW TV Title at the time, also made by Mike Vartanian did not have the Taz name engraved at the top. As for the belt's current location, Taz sold the belt to Judge Jeff Jones who works for Maryland Championship Wrestling who let Chris Chetti use the belt during the angle in MCW. The belt is now owned by a private collector. --BeltFanDan (talk) 22:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Belt

message: Please stop adding "The original belt used for the FTW belt was a retired TV Championship belt painted orange." The original belt was a brand new belt specifically made for Taz. His name is engraved in the upper portion of the belt. It was NOT a retired Television belt, although the belt is the same design. If it were an old TV belt how would the Taz portion get on the belt? Welded? Even if it is possible, I have held the belt in my hand and as pictures clearly show, it was all one piece so it was not a modified belt but a brand new belt. Numerous people can verify this including past owners of the belt as well as the creator of the belt, Mike Vartanian. --BeltFanDan (talk) 02:53, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Cathedral Church of St Marie, Sheffield

message: "St Marie’s was completed in 1850 and consecrated on September 11th. ... it was not until 1889 that the church was free from debt." Something's wrong here - Catholic churches are not consecrated until they are free of debt. Presumably St. Marie's was opened in 1850 and consecrated in 1889? Perhaps you might want to check your sources? C0pernicus 19:15, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That text was added by , and I have just discovered that it is actually a copyvio from the St Marie's website. So if it is incorrect then the church itself has it incorrect. However, as copyvio text it needs either removed or substantially edited.   JeremyA 00:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: By the look of it the St Marie's web site has the same author, so we're no nearer a valid source of information. C0pernicus 14:25, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

text: But the information is still wrong. The Catholic Directory (I looked at the 2002 edition) gives 1889 as the date of consecration. Want to double check? C0pernicus 12:24, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Matthew E. Welsh

message: No discussion of his statement that Louie, Louie was "pornographic"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.116.132 (talk) 04:22, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ECW World Tag Team Championship

message: Hey i've heard a rumour going around that these titles will be brought back to ECW simply as the ECW Tag Team Championship. Does anyone know if this is true?   Belevsquad  (talk)  11:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they are returning. Check out   ----Belevsquad 05:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rumor sites are hardly evidence.  Not saying it won't happen because the rumor sites are right pretty often, I'm just saying you should still take it with a grain of salt.  Besides, even if they are considering it right now, plans could always change between now and WrestleMania. Jeff Silvers 14:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles returning? 

message: Isn't the ECW World Tag Team Championship?
:depends who's definition of world title you're using.76.226.105.131 (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he meant the name of the title, they were most commonly referred to as the ECW World Tag Titles in the real ECW. TonyFreakinAlmeida (talk) 22:17, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Eventhough it is part of kayfabe, Apter mags ran an article in like 1999 granting all ECW titles World Title status after signing the TNN deal.--BeltFanDan (talk) 22:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would have no effect on the name of the title.  A promotion can claim world status or call their title a world title without PWI's approval.  PWI world status is not an official standard.  It's just a magazine's opinion. TonyFreakinAlmeida (talk) 20:34, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Roger D. Branigin

message: Although Branigin served in the United States Army during World War II, no reliable sources found as of yet state that he served overseas in a war zone during the war. More specifically, the sources do not establish defining role in World War II. Accordingly, :Category:American military personnel of World War II was removed from the article. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 22:54, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II service
Talk:Ciniselli Circus

message: The article, found in the category of museums in Saint Petersburg, should be divided because the building itself is NOT a museum. Yes, it is a historical building, claimed to be Russia's 1st specially designed circus building. But it houses a working circus AND a museum. They should be treated separately.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GregZak (talk • contribs) 18:39, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The stub is just too short for that. --Ghirla-трёп- 08:26, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dividing the article

message: I'm not sure if this circus was the first one. In the 1840s, there was the Circus-Theatre, see Mariinsky Theatre about that. --Ghirla -трёп- 19:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting.  I guess the question is, was this earlier circus built from stone?  I'll see what I can find out. — Stumps 08:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the Theatre-Circus is the same building which is now called the Mariinsky, and it is most definitely made of stone (or brick). The question is, was this Theatre-Circus really a circus in the modern term of the world or the "circus" in the name referred to something else, e.g., to the circular form of the stage? --Ghirla -трёп- 08:14, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I had thought that there was a theatre-circus (possibly of wood??) on the site, and then the current theatre was built there in 1859/60 and then operated only as a theatre/opera?  I have no particular sources for this, and I might well be completely wrong! — Stumps 10:59, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

text: An equestrian circus was built on 29 January 1849 in the Theatrical Square by Albert Kavos. Initially the building was designed so that it also could be used as a theater. After 10 years the circus burned down, it was of "old-fashioned wooden construction"(). The building was reconstructed and since then it was used only for musical performances. So — for now at least — I think the Circus Ciniselli's claim to be the first stone circus stands.  I will work some of this material into the articles. — Stumps 15:16, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First Circus of Stone?