Talk:Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976

message: *Changed example of TSCA ban from Chlorofluorocarbons to methylene chloride. CFCs are not banned under TSCA. They are strictly regulated by Clean Air Act Title VI.
*The links to the actual U.S.C. language are broken.
*What does "It grandfathered most existing chemicals" mean?! (Ntid4wpid (talk) 18:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I will work on it. Reengler (talk) 16:19, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As it already says in the "Untitled" section of this "Talk:" page, [quote] : The links to the actual U.S.C. language are broken.
I do not know how to fix those links.  At http://www.gpo.gov/fdsysinfo/aboutfdsys.htm it seems to be indicating that FDsys -- that is, "GPO’s Federal Digital System (FDsys)" -- that is, http://www.fdsys.gov/ -- is intended to be a sort of "one stop shopping" solution for finding [certain kinds of] information.  By the way, , http://www.fdsys.gov/ seems to automatically RE-DIRECT to http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ -- (is that confusing enough, for you?).
However, I for one [apparently] do not know how to use FDsys, because I did spend some time, and still could not figure out what the correct URL would be, to "fix" [one of] the dead links() that are currently in this article.  
Maybe my time would have been better spent finding some other article, in this same Wiki 'pedia, that already does have some correct URLs (ones that work!) for some "n1 USC n2" type hyperlinks.  You are welcome to inform me of the results, if you have already done so. 
One of the dead links, for example, is in the section TSCA#TSCA and the EPA, under the first sub-section, called "TSCA#Sections".  It is in the first sentence there.  That hyperlink is coded as "15 USC (C. 53) 2601-2692" and [hence] it displays as "15 USC (C. 53) 2601-2692" , and it points to the URL http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title15/chapter53_.html -- which does not work.  ((That is, that URL does not work "as of" Aug. 12, 2014; but it probably ALSO did not work "as of" a long time ago.)) 
However, by doing some Google searches, I found that there does seem to be a copy of "15 USC (C. 53) 2601-2692" -- (actually, going all the way to § 2697, which is two "subchapters" beyond § 2692) online.  I found it at http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/15/chapter-53 . 
I realize that there might be some good reasons to "prefer" an authoritative "dot gov" web site, instead of one that is from "law dot cornell dot edu".  However, just to stop the bleeding -- until the doctor arrives -- I suggest that we consider temporarily supplementing some of those URLs that do not work, by adding this alternative, that appears to work OK.  Not removing the dead links... those might serve to remind us that this "fixup" was just a temporary solution.  Just adding some links that are still alive and well.  ...and (of course) we can always debate the pro's and con's of this idea right here on this "Talk:" page. 
Any advice or other "comments" would be appreciated.  --Mike Schwartz (talk) 04:17, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect the challenge is that the US Code website keeps laws as-written for earlier years and adds content as the laws are changed (rather than just updating existing pages with the latest text). Assuming that Cornell keeps its pages up-to-date, it may be the most convenient way to link to the current text of the statute, rather than updating links to govinfo.gov. Reengler (talk) 16:27, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idea for a (partial?) (temporary?) remedy for some "dead" [broken] "15 USC ***" links  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050809003059/http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title15/chapter53_.html to http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title15/chapter53_.html
*Added  tag to http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title15/ch
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051101223814/http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title15/chapter53_subchapterii_.html to http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title15/chapter53_subchapterii_.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060824020205/http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title15/chapter53_subchapteriii_.html to http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title15/chapter53_subchapteriii_.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060511194234/http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title15/chapter53_subchapteriv_.html to http://www.access.gpo.gov/uscode/title15/chapter53_subchapteriv_.html
*Added  tag to http://www.acs.org/content/dam/acsorg/policy/acsonthehill/briefings/tscareform/crs-tsca-implementation-2008
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140506112809/http://digitalcommons.law.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1084&context=wujlp to http://digitalcommons.law.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1084&context=wujlp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130902201011/http://www.lni.wa.gov/wisha/p-ts/pdfs/toxicsubstances.pdf to http://www.lni.wa.gov/wisha/p-ts/pdfs/toxicsubstances.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140505233853/http://reformtsca.com/Main/News/Third-Way-Supports-the-Chemical-Safety-Improvement-Act.pdf to http://www.reformtsca.com/Main/News/Third-Way-Supports-the-Chemical-Safety-Improvement-Act.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:01, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There was TSCA as passed (Pub.L. 94-469) and TSCA as amended. Couldn't find a link to Subchapter I (TSCA proper), so included link to entire Chapter 53. The Cornell site is okay, but NOT official.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.67.29.85 (talk) 19:21, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links added for full text of TSCA 

message: So much of this entry relates to the state of TSCA prior to the enactment of the Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act. Should the description of the past criticisms be updated to reflect TSCA reform?Reengler (talk) 15:48, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. The overall article should reflect the current state of the law. Some history on the older versions of the law is useful, but should not dominate the content. The "Reform bills" section is outdated and should be condensed or eliminated. Thanks. Moreau1 (talk) 16:01, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of tense to reflect TSCA reform?