lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The X-Files/Archive 1

message: The photo on the X-Files page seems to have disappeared. We've seen this on a couple of other pages lately, presumably due to all the server troubles and file moves, so we just re-uploaded the original photo with the same name and dimensions. Is the uploader of the original photo still around? — B.Bryant 04:25, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial message

message: The website for foxhome.com seems to be a commercial site with little or no information relevant to wikipedia X-files page. JWSchmidt 20:41, 27 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: External link

message: The cigarette brand of The X-Files' character Cancer Man. Obvious similarities to Marlboro.
:Agent Monica Reyes also happens to smoke Light versions of the same cigarette brand.  Not sure if this has any symbolic significance.
:Clueless 08:50, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Morley

message: The Success of the X-Files is based on the fact that the stories are real!
For Proof: There is one episode concerning a fanatic sect around a wargod priest
believing to be praying to the Allmighty God.
The setting: A small white Church.
Fanatics(of A Wargod NOT the Allmighty)
danceing with snakes(mistaken for a symbol of sin in their mythology)
around their necks.
If you people search for that episode plz add the season and title
thanks in advance
--62.206.114.179 00:45, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Success of the X-Files 

message: It seems like it might be appropriate to post a spoiler warning somewhere, as this certainly reveals plot details.  Notthe9 07:05, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers? 

message: I have breathed upon the article, and tried to give it a polish. I watched the first few series on and off, and quite enjoyed the show. In the UK, it seemed to catch the public mood, what with the UFOs and mentions of Roswell, and its subsequent decline, long after I ceased bothering about it, is quite hard to encapsulate in an encyclopaedia article; like the old Batman TV series, it passed like a summer breeze. Now that the heat has died down the show should be easier to write about.
My further thoughts. The main text has no significant mention of either Walter Skinner or the Cigarette Smoking Man - I remember them being quite important cast members; perhaps someone could trim the opening paragraphs and write a short 'Major Characters' section at the top. Understandably for something so trivial, there are a lot of 'some sources argue' and 'it could be said that' assertions. The article was, until I had a go at it, split into present and past tenses. There was a section which lauded the work of producers Glen Morgan and James Wong; perhaps they were crucial elements of the show's success, but the article shouldn't read like a bitter tirade. I know science fiction fans, I know how they think. I could have gone down that path myself.-Ashley Pomeroy 20:54, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts
Talk:ER (TV series)/Archive 1

message: I removed the picture because that is no more about the current cast. How about a new one? --ThomasK 08:31, Feb 26, 2005 (UTC)
:I'm pretty sure that's the most current cast photo. Either way, I think the image should stay on the page until there's a newer one to replace it. Lachatdelarue (talk) 16:55, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah, but they only left during this season. i don't think we'll find a newer cast photo until the next season starts. Lachatdelarue (talk) 13:59, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: The article says that Noah Wyle is the last original cast member to leave the show. The last with his face in the opening credits, yes, but what about Yvette Freeman and Emily Wagner? And possibly Laura Ceron too (was she *really* not in the first series?) --Bonalaw 14:30, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the sentence to "He was the last of the original starring cast members to leave the show", to clarify. Lachatdelarue (talk) 15:16, 30 May 2005 (UTC)

text: ;You forgot Deezer D. (Malik) as another 1994-present non-starring cast member :) Lachatdelarue (talk) 15:02, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Noah Wyle

message: Is this really intersting to have that huge list of broadcasters ? I propose to move it in a sub-article such as ER (TV Series) broadcasters. Lvr 30 June 2005 12:31 (UTC)
:No opposition ? I do it. Lvr 11:01, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadcasters 

message: I noticed awhile ago that there is no list of ER episodes. I've decided to start such an article. Since there are 246 episodes so far, I am temporarily keeping the article as a subpage to my userpage, until it can be completed. I copied the list from TV.com, and am currently working on putting each season into its own table. If anyone wants to help or has a way to make the table look nicer, please do. ER episodes. Lachatdelarue (talk) 21:38, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  episode list
Talk:Blak Twang

message: 'and usually seen as its number two figure behind Roots Manuva' - I'm not sure about this.  By whom?  Jason Sabourin 12:25, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Voluntary Aided

message: I've moved the content of this article to a new article Voluntary aided as I can't see any basis for capitalising all the words. The article itself uses voluntary aided in lower case several times and googling suggests that lower case is the norm. Miscapitalising the second word means that links have to be capitalised regardless of content. See Wikipedia:Naming conventions. Valiantis 12:35, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved
Talk:Arkley

message: Few other London or UK locations have separate entries for the area and for its history.  Arkley is certainly not eminent in having a rich and varied history, I see no reason why there should be a separate "History of" page.--Lost tourist (Talk) 21:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - this would make a nice complete article at Arkley.  Splitting at this level isn't required. --Regan123 13:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with History of Arkley

message: I've known this area to be a seperate area. Why is it mentioned in the history as if it were the same place as Arkley? Simply south 16:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barnet Gate
Talk:Copterline

message: I think the note about the 2004 flight restriction does not belong under the crash title as it incorrectly connects these two events. The yellow press likes to feast by combining these two and also the fact that the CEO of Copterline was restricted from flying for one day. 
The crew onboard were professionals and it is already known that it's highly unlikely that they caused the crash.
- Worried
: Agree, this information is "yellowish". It would be interesting to know how many regular lines using helicopters there are apart from Copterline. --Magabund 18:24, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wizard's First Rule

message: This article has a lot of likely accurate information, but the details are clouded by POV terms which indicate that the author is an active fan of the topic. I have nothing against the facts, but there are several items which are judging the topic in the Success section alone. Slavlin (talk) 04:31, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're a bit off-base, actually.  None of the information in that success section has anything directly related to POV.  It explains how the book began and informs people on how successful the book is, which I guess you could consider POV, but they are still facts.  I have nothing to do with writing this page, but it seemed a bit odd that accusations of peacock terms were put on the page. Vilepickle (talk) 01:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That the distaste that I feel in reading the article comes from the positioning of the "success" section.  With this section coming directly after the lead, the article comes off as overly fawning.  If it were placed at the end of the article, it would be fine. Philhower (talk) 15:14, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone - "Success" section 

message: I removed the first 2 paragraphs of the "Success" section that was present in this edit  as it almost an exact copy and paste from this article  with the only differences being edits relating to give specific dates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Slavlin (talk • contribs) 
:Good catch, I am going to try to work that information from that source back in now though as it is good information. Icewedge (talk) 01:21, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Violation

message: ‘commentary’ as "teaser" of bad insight while treating this new as you would a crystal…chewing misplaced opinion on something harder than granite --- for the book didn’t become best seller for its details on boundaries and other mediocre obstructions, but something far clearer than that…the part I didn’t add…it is completely necessary to leave out writing on par with “the legends of the seeker” than with an honest summary of its book  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.131.213.38 (talk) 20:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, I have no idea what you are talking about, but I will assume you are not a native english speaker and give your edits to the article and this talk page the benefit of the doubt.  I will point out though, as I briefly alluded to in my edit comments, that the plot summary is not supposed to be a teaser for the novel.  It's supposed to be a full summary, that reveals the thematic elements of the book.  It would be great to also have a section that analyses the phylosophical and political aspects of the novel, but to my knowledge, no one has found any reliable sources to write a section on that yet.  Regarding the plot summary, I'll point you to the Novels Wikiproject.  In the meantime, feel free to improve on the summary, but not to remove it. - Runch (talk) 19:35, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Summary Content
Talk:Farsi vs. Persian

message: ***This entry is OK. "Farsi vs. Persian" should not be deleted. Those who learn/study/speak Persian  have to know this page's information. It's informative and neutral. Please do NOT delet that.
Pejman (wikipedia user)
***This article is very informative and complete. I have seen some people who think Farsi and Persian are two differen languages. This article is very useful for them.
*** This piece is very important for thoes who are interested in Persian language. It's great that Wikipedia keep it online.
The article doesn't seem a candidate for speedy deletion to me... is there any particular reason ? --Raistlin 14:02, 12 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Persian or Farsi?. mikka (t) 21:02, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD
Talk:Vancouver Downtown Historic Railway

message: I love Wikipedia! I was recently in Vancouver, heard mention of this, but wasn't able to find more info about it. Thanks! Ground Zero 13:55, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: May I suggest to add under "External Links" a link to the Vancouver's 2010 Streetcar microsite (www.vancouverstreetcar.bombardier.com). I believe we created an interesting website, which provides useful information on the Olympic Line project in 2010. The link to this microsite is currently a bit hidden under "References"
Thanks.
Michel Barthe
Online Communications
Bombardier Transportation
Btcomms (talk) 14:15, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to Vancouver's 2010 Streetcar microsite
Talk:Mohanlal

message: A nomination submitted for the featured article on Mohanlal. Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/Mohanlal, please vote Shaji issac (talk) 05:48, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fractured article nomination 

message: I've reverted your changes again. Referring to him as one of the "evergreen heroes", "matinee idol", "most admired", etc. is way, way, way over the top non-neutral commentary. I know you're new here, and that's ok, but you need to take the time to read WP:NEUTRAL and understand that we write here in a neutral, encyclopedic tone. We are not a fan site. We are not Mohanlal's website either. It is quite enough to note the many wards he has received. That some press has referred to him as <insert over-the-top superlative> does not mean he holds that status. There is no such status. You can not go to an awards ceremony and receive an award for being an evergreen hero. This sort of discourse is wholly unnecessary and pollutes the article. See also Talk:Mohanlal/Archive_1#Removal_of_sourced_positives_by_Ambeinghari and Talk:Mohanlal/Archive_1#Lede_text:_"one_of_the_greatest_actors...". We've been through this before. Please stop. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 02:16, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drippingly positive commentary, again 

message: you can write.... mohanlal is an indian actor...... instead of south indian actor
....why all are seperating india as south......if it's about bollywood actors....says indian actor works in hindi cinema.......if it's south actor's.....says south indian actor.... works in south......even on Bollywood actors u can say salman is an north indian actor.... works in north......i don't even watches his movies....or even i won't watches bollywood movies....most of the people won't watches but how can u say.... whole indian actor for bollywood actor.... it's just 1 part of india.... famous by hindi... respect all people.... respect all languages......say everyone indian....or else bollywood actor is an north indian actor.... like how they uses south south south....... it's not request it's warning 2409:4070:4E8F:40F2:0:0:7C4B:50F (talk) 17:14, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: — DaxServer (t · m · c) 17:20, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  correct it 

message: "Mohanlal has a prolific career spanning over four decades, during which he has acted in more than 400 films" for this sentence in the article it shows it needed better source. Could anyone add any reliable source or please delete the current source. This article is a GA and need to be more careful in this and need to update.Paavamjinn (talk) 19:23, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better Source Needed
Talk:Typhoon Gladys (1991)

message: Like Yunya, I feel this offers very little information. Rather than adding to it, I propose merging this with the 1991 seasonal article when I write it. A lot of storms cause over 100 deaths and moderate damage, so why does this even have an article? Jdorje is probably going to kill me for suggesting the removal of 3 WPAC typhoons, but I feel it should be done. It is much more organized under one seasonal article. Hurricanehink 04:18, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Philippine Internet Exchange

message: Poor grammar, bad syntax, and weak sentence contructions. Some sentences may not be factual.
It was CV, I linked to the source (found by google) and rewrote, chopping extensively so it would sound like an advert. RJFJR 17:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

message: "...since then the 5 pioneering ISP's have successfully been exchanging Philippine-Centric New World Hotel on July 3, 1997."
What does this mean? What does "New World Hotel" got to do with PhIX? Simoncpu (talk) 09:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New World Hotel? 
Talk:Shanghai railway station

message: An article that you have been involved in editing, Shanghai Railway Station (Metro) , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going , and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Steve chiu (talk) 16:57, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion for [[Shanghai Railway Station (Metro) ]]

message: "Unlike other Chinese cities Shanghai Railway Station is the only station of significant size in Shanghai and handles all departures"
I thought there was also a Shanghai South station and a couple of other stations that handle significant traffic. Need experts. --Sumple (Talk) 22:46, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem sentence 

message: I have moved back Shanghai Railway Station and Shanghai South Railway Station to capital letter writing, as the names are used as proper names and this writing is found in almost all official translations concerning these stations I know of (also check English language versions of Chinese government websites for this and other Chinese cities' station names). Bluebird47 03:27, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing of Shanghai stations in English 

message: The lead gives 上海火车站 as the name in Chinese; while this is a direct translation of "Shanghai Railway Station", we can see in the photo that it is actually labelled 上海站, which I understand as simply the Chinese for "Shanghai Station". Perhaps this should be changed? Imaginatorium (talk) 08:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name in Chinese
Talk:Infinitary logic

message: I've unmathified the definition of Lα,β, but there are some other problems in that section. "\implies", although the logical (pardon the pun) symbol, seems much too large.  "\rightarrow" or "\Rightarrow" should be adequate.  Also, transfinite induction might be a derived theorem schema
:\{\land_{\gamma<\delta}[\land_{\beta<\gamma}(A_\beta)]\implies A_\gamma\} \implies \land_{\epsilon < \delta}A_\epsilon
I'll get it right, eventually.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 08:20, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hilbert-type infinitary logic 

message: In my opinion it may be helpful if some historical information about the logics \mathcal L_{\alpha\beta} were included. There is also no source for the use of the name "Hilbert-type" that I could immediately find. What are some citations that contain where and when the logics \mathcal L_{\alpha\beta} originated from, and that explain the etymology of the name "Hilbert-type infinitary logic"?
Some possible leads:
* Work of Karp in the 1950s and 60s seems to be central to the development of the theory of these logics. Karp's central problem was phrased as "For which cardinals a,b do there exist definable complete formal systems for formulas of length less than a in which fewer than b variables can be quantified at a time?" in the preface to Languages with expressions of infinite length (1964). This book uses the \mathcal L_{\alpha\beta} notation, and mentions Hilbert-style formal systems for proof (with discussion on sets of axioms and rules of inference). However the infinitary logic \mathcal L_{\alpha\beta} itself might not be called Hilbert-type.
* In Gloede's "Set theory in infinitary languages" (In Proceedings of the International Summer Institute and Logic Colloquium, Kiel 1974, Lecture Notes in Mathematics vol. 499), there is the quote "the languages \mathcal L_{\kappa\lambda} of KARP 1964".
* In "A formal system of first-order predicate calculus with infinitely long expressions" by S. Maehara and G. Takeuti (1961, Project Euclid link), the \mathcal L-notation is not introduced, only the logics that are now called \mathcal L_{\alpha\alpha} appear to be studied, while these logics are not called "Hilbert-type infinitary logics". It contains the quote "The first-order predicate calculus with infinitely long expressions is being developed by Berkeley school" on the origins of presumably the logics that are now called \mathcal L_{\alpha\beta}. As the notation \mathcal L_{\alpha\alpha} is not used, maybe the notation did not exist (or at least was not known to Maehara and Takeuti) in 1961. C7XWiki (talk) 21:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of terminology "Hilbert-type infinitary logic" and L notation
Wikipedia talk:Pokémon Adoption Center/Next

message: Do we even have an article for the first movie? Sonic Mew | talk to me 14:30, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
:Sounds like a good article to try to get up to featured article status.  Almafeta 07:36, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

message: The following is which articles could become featured at a later date:
* Pikachu
* Mew
* Pokémon Red and Blue (could be any other game but I'dd prefer it be Red and Blue)
* Pokémon
* Professor Oak
Any more? I'm sure there must be. --Celestianpower hab 17:06, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly not however, all of these articles could become featured but i think its unlikely that people 'll accept more than Satoshi Tajiri, Pokémon, Pokémon Red and Blue and Pikachu though, sadly. --Celestianpower hab 17:12, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You say that, but, then again... Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wario seems to be doing well. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 17:19, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah - It's a good article. I would say wario is to the Mario World as Team Rocket is to Pokémon. --Celestianpower hab 17:24, 13 August 2005 (UTC)

text: I don't think Pokémon stands much of a chance, seeing as it's so high-profile...  articles that are edited very often don't get featured, as an article that is constantly changing does not represent "the best that Wikipedia can offer."  With that in mind, I think that if PAC works on a game, Pokémon Red and Blue is the way to go -- it started all of this, for pete's sake!  Almafeta 19:49, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Up to Featured article Status 

message: The redirect Wikipedia:Next has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Q𝟤𝟪 15:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Wikipedia:Next]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Rambler (automobile)

message: I was going to split them, but thought otherwise.
:—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cadillac (talk • contribs). Revision as of 10:42, August 12, 2005.
Abernathy to 'redirect the company to compete with the 'big three' is a common paraphrase of an older false report of history; AMC outsold Chrysler in '58/9 by making fuel efficient compact type cars, making AMC a member of the 'big three' those two years. Rather it was GM, Ford and Chrysler moving in to the compact and intermediate sized car marketplaces already pioneered and proven by 'a smaller four' US carmakers such as the '50 Nash Rambler, '51 Kaiser Henry J, '53 Hudson Jet & the '59 Studebaker Lark. Therefore, the commonly repeated paraphrase is not a true saying at all, but a glaring patch to cover the 'big three's' seven to ten year delay in serving US consumers a variety of different sized smaller type cars. 
-Hence, someone with an astute mind needs to edit the article to make it more honest and truthful in this regard.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.1.212.177 (talk) 13:32, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

message: Something needs to be added about the Rambler Rebel and Rambler Rogue.  While never as numerous as Stangs or Chevelles, they were quick and stylish.  I'm inclined to delete the "principally remembered due to 'Beep Beep'" as an insult to Ramblerphiles...  Trekphiler 04:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: AMC musclecars

message: To me the matter is as clear as night and day, throughout the Wiki Auto-project the general naming convention in instances like these (where the automobile name has been used by another topic, or where the automobile name has several possible meanings we use the format of "Name (automobile)".  In the case of Rambler, this page has "Rambler (car)".  Moving the page simply brings the title in line with other like topics. So the pages need to swap places and "Rambler (automobile)" needs to get the article, and "Rambler (car)" needs the redirect. Stude62 00:44, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chief reason for move

message: I don't have citations, but a friend that had two Ramblers told me that it was the first make with a transistorized radio, and a station wagon with a roll-down (vice swing-up) rear window.
LorenzoB 06:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Innovations