lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bisexual Foundation

message: Help, help.  I started this entry for the Bisexual Foundation which due to it's prominence was really needed.  But other than it's notability, especially in the US Bisexual community, that the well known US Bisexual activist & researcher Dr. Fritz Klein is a founder & current board member and that it is the parent organization of the on-line publication "Bi Magazine" I don't know that many fact about it.  
Anyone who knows more about it please make it better?  
Thanks so much CyntWorkStuff 17:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Babbit and Catstello

message: I know off the top of my head that Babbit and Costello appeared in at least 2 cartoons as mice, not one. This should be mentioned in a later revision. Also, I am curious as to when and how Babbit and Catstello made appearances in Sylvester and Tweety Mysteries. And finally, does anyone else think that Babbit might have been named after the famous Disney animator Art Babbit?- John Pannozzi, April 22, 2006
*Highly unlikely. It's made fairly obvious that Babbit's name was a play on Bud Abbott. (Sugar Bear 18:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Brixton tube station

message: Previous image: 
I have replaced this with a very similar, but higher-res and less grainy shot of the station that shows it fully open and without scaffolding. Admittedly an incremental improvement but it seemed worth making.
--Parsingphase 18:13, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I wonder if it would be worth mentioning the classical music that is played at the entrance to the station, the "uncoolness" of which seems to have done a magnificent job of preventing teenagers from loitering nearby? Jumble Jumble (talk) 13:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 
Talk:John Kendrew

message: :I have a photograph, perfect for the man and his contribution to science, and am trying to get use permission.--Dumarest 11:43, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just looked at the history of this article page - it is pathetic!--Dumarest 18:23, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm working in it - the image is in and the text is in progress - I leave now for a sausage pizza. --Dumarest 21:48, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: More or less done - comments encouraged. He is a giant in science- he deserves more than a passing mention. --Dumarest 20:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:The Garden (John Foxx album)

message: I remember reading an interview with Foxx in which he said that he wasn't going to divulge the location where the photos for the Church booklet were taken.  Does anyone know where it was? --Richardrj talk email 08:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The ''Church'' booklet

message: As you might have noticed, I've added the tracklisting of the new 2008 reissue bonus disc on the article. Upon listening to the bonus disc, I noticed the titles for "Swimmer I" and "Swimmer II" have been reversed when compared to the 2001 reissue (i.e. "Swimmer 2" in the 2001 reissue is the same track as "Swimmer I" in the 2008 reissue). No-one seems to have noticed this before and as a result I have no source to support the information. Additionally it's of course possible that that the tracks were misidentified on the 2001 reissue but correctly named in the new one. — Kjet (talk · contribs) 16:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008 reissue and the Swimmers 
Talk:Zahira College, Colombo

message: When is the copyvio investigation gonna end? If it has ended shall we remove the tag Mystic 18:22, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The signal that the investigation has ended will be the tag being removed or the article being deleted. Until then, leave it be. If you want to work on the article in the meantime, you can use the temporary subpage link in the notice. — Saxifrage ✎ 21:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

text: It is taking a strangely long time. I suggest you leave a short message asking why it's taking so long at the administrator's notice board. — Saxifrage ✎ 20:13, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Zahira College has had more prominent alumni than that is on the list.. Could anyone add more to it..  «₪Mÿš†íc₪»  (T) 00:34, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni 

message: The names of the founders cited in the infobox and text are different- the infobox has MC Siddi Lebbe as one, while the lead replaces him with ILM Abdul Azeez. This needs to be verified and fixed. - ක - (talk) 12:46, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Founders
Talk:Chelsea Market

message: I removed the link to Kraft's Australian division. Leaving aside the antipodean location, does Nabisco even still have facilities there?–♥ «Charles A. L.» 18:45, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  O-R-E-O 

message: The 22-building complex information noted in Steve Cuozzo's November 16, 2013 "Don’t trust anything on Wikipedia" article was added 19 April 2006 by this edit and deleted 18 November 2013. The Huffington Post referred to it as a 22-building complex May 31, 2013, but the language in the Huffington Post article seems to match the older language in Wikipedia's article. The Wikipedia edit probably escaped review for all these years due to only having one category, no talk page banners, and it may have been more of a wording problem than anything else. I found "The building, a collection of 18 structures from the 1880's to 1930's, once housed a Nabisco factory." The article is unsources, and I will be revising it shortly with source material. -- Jreferee (talk) 10:08, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 22-building complex 

message: In Todays news it was announced that chelsea market has been bought by alphabet (google) O. Schuetz (talk) 21:56, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Akquisition by Alphabet 

message: Chelsea Market is featured in the recent 'Mockingbird' series by Marvel comics. In that a lot of the plot and action revolves around a very large, very secret good guy base hidden underneath the market. Lots42 (talk) 11:19, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  In comic books
Talk:Tina Barrett

message: Have removed the majority of the article which seems to be a copy and paste from here:
http://www.vivasclub.com/sclub/bios/tina.html
Miss Saff 18:30, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: ...but we should at least try and gather some information and write some form of short biography. - ǀ Mikay ǀ 16:48, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I know she hasn't been up to much... 

message: I've removed these two lines as they don't cite sources and seem more like personal opinion:
"Tina is not ready to come-back even if she has written many songs with various artists. She wants to concentrate on a dancing career and plans to come-back as a choreographer."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.96.239.229 (talk) 17:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the reliable source, JGXEnite. 87.36.25.34 (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed OR

message: Tina Barrett was first introduced to me through the YoGPoD and I'm not the only one who is in this situation, they have a very large subscriber base. So what I'm requesting is that the YoGPod have at least a small part added to the wiki page about how they reference her and in which episodes of the YoGPoD they mention her.  
TheYonkous (talk) 22:55, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Bility (talk) 04:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 31 December 2011 

message: In this edit I removed content submitted by . In addition being written in a tone inappropriate for an encyclopedia with odd phrasing about "a wisp of chiffon", "her prize assets" (I can't tell if this means tits or ass or what) and "protected her modesty", this so-called "controversy" has not been established as noteworthy through the inclusion of reliable sources that describe a "controversy". The fact that she wore a revealing dress isn't enough to warrant inclusion in an article. If the dress caused a shit storm of protests and whatnot, and this was picked up by the press, then it might be worth including. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:42, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Controversy" 
Talk:James Marshall (author)

message: This page looks like a copyvio from somewhere...can someone check for me? --69.117.7.63 18:30, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: (old 1)

message: Near the end of a revision to cover more adequately the posthumous Wilder Award and lack of contemporary recognition, I noticed that this was tacked onto the lead during April --no reference, repetitive wording.
(quote) "He was also homosexual and his husband Billy Murky died at the ending of the George and Martha series of picture books."
was not possible to undo automatically so I deleted it manually and tacked "apparent vandalism" onto the end of the edit summary.
--P64 (talk) 20:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism? 
Category talk:Service Employees International Union

message: Hi! my name is Stephanie Im new to this erea and I been working as a CNA for 5-6years never heard of the union until today. And I would like to know more about the Union and find a job that can lead to a caceer I Thank you and look forward of being on your team.Stephanie.whack@yahoo.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephanie whack (talk • contribs) 04:44, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Job seeker
Talk:Time Machine

message: Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 18:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: Rubbish! Its the TARDIS! Or even Stone Cold's time machine in Celeb Deathmatch! Fergananim 17:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The most famous time machine in popular culture is the De Lorean DMC-12

message: Built page Time Machine (disambiguation) that redirect to Time Machine (here).  per Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Page_naming_conventions It is acceptable, on the other hand, to create a page at "Term XYZ (disambiguation)" that redirects to the disambiguation page at "Term XYZ". This type of redirect can be used to indicate deliberate links to the disambiguation page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jeepday (talk • contribs) 03:21, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Time Machine (disambiguatio)]]
Talk:Rand Dyck

message: user:Kroche14 has created a rewritten subpage for this article.  Tomb Ride My Talk 18:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, someone who monitors Wikipedia:Copyright problems will come and make a decision on the matter.  Unfortunately, there is currently a backlog of about a month.  It should, however, be resolved in a few more weeks.  -- JamesTeterenko 21:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TEMP SUB 

message: This comparison, and comparing the current text of the article to http://www.ocufa.on.ca/winners/dyck.asp shows practically no similarities. I've reverted the text (and slightly cleaned up the whitespace) and removed the copyright violation notice. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 03:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:Kandern

message: Mel, I seem to have just caught on to your example of the "High Street" from your earlier messages. I had not looked at the high street article, and thought that you were simply refering to a street that was named "High Street". This was definitely a case of UK/US usage, as the equivalent term in the US is Main Street. Even so, we never refer to "the main street" in any context that I've heard. When I was growing up, there was a road down the block called "High Street." To us, it was simply the same as "Maple Street" or "First Avenue." No 'the' in site.--Eva db 08:40, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''the'' High Street
Talk:Gibraltar Premier Division

message: This article claims that "the Gibraltarian Football League was established ... in 1905", but the list of League Champions begins in 1895, which would seem to indicate that it existed prior to the date listed. Strom 18:48, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistencies

message: Hi, i have create a wiki page for Transfers involving Gibraltar Premier Division clubs for the 2016/17 season. Would you be able to link this page to that mine? thanks
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibraltar_Premier_Division_Transfers_2016-17
195.166.214.4 (talk) 06:10, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Gibraltar Premier Division Transfers 2016/17
Talk:Oklahoma Land Race

message: I am disputing this article because facts about the Cherokee Outlet Land Run, which happened in 1893, are intertwined in this article, which should be about the opening of the Unassigned Lands in 1889. These are two completely different land rushes. As well, showing the picture from the 1893 Cherokee Outlet run confuses the matter even more. The Unassigned Lands were in central Oklahoma and didn't touch the Kansas border. They led to the establishment of Oklahoma City. This article needs a complete rewrite. --D Wilbanks 18:49, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Corrected this, but the article still needs a rewrite. --Nmajdan 15:46, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

text: *Both photos seem to be from the 1893 land run.  See the second photo's filename on mcclenny.org http://www.mcclenny.org/images/cherokee.jpg Ash Lux 02:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies 

message: The inaccuracies have worked themselves into other Wikipedia articles:
* The article on Far and Away (movie) claims the movie is about the 1889 Oklahoma land run, but imdb claims 1893 Cherokee Strip land run .
* The article on Cimarron (book) also links to this article and seems to confuse the subject a bit too.
* The article on events that took place on September 16 links to this article, but was refering to the 1893.
- Ash Lux 20:11, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccuracies in other articles
Talk:Gibraltar Tunnel

message: Why does it have to be so high? --Abdull 18:52, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it is a narrow shipping passage. -- Szvest - Wiki me up ® 12:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

text: It is written in the article that: A floating bridge was not an option either because of the number of ships passing through the Gibraltar corridor and the strong currents of the strait.--BIL (talk) 07:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does it have to be so high?

message: I am moving this article to its accurate title "Gibraltar tunnel" as the decision to build a tunnel instead of a bridge has been approved. See article. -- Szvest - Wiki me up ® 12:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article move

message: I just removed the following text from the article:
:In the event that the earth's general sea level rises significantly due to global warming, then a barrage would become an option worth studying.  Such a barrage would incorporate locks to pass ships, a road and rail link to connect the continents, and a hydroelectric power plant to generate power from the flow which would be generated by the Mediterranean's excess evaporation (see Mediterranean Sea:Oceanography). Also see Atlantropa for a discussion of a similar project that was never undertaken (although Atlantropa had many other goals and requirements).
:To prevent the Mediterranean becoming inexorably saltier, a large pipe would be led from the deep part of the dam, down into the depths of the Atlantic ocean. Because of the salinity difference, the outward flow of deep Mediterranean water would not require pumping.
:The costs of such a barrage would be astronomical, but the costs could be spread among the large number of countries which would be protected — including those of the Black Sea basin.
I don't see where this text has anything to do with a tunnel proposal. --StuffOfInterest 19:18, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This sounds like it might be used for a dam or bridge project, not the tunnel. 207.69.139.141 23:41, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed section 

message: I think that the article on Gibraltar Bridge should be merged in here. The combined article could be called "Gibraltar Crossing" or "Gibraltar Fixed Crossing," but since it seems that the tunnel is a more likely structure for now it could stay as Gibraltar Tunnel. --BOARshevik (talk) 01:32, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Jean Poiret

message: This is my first created article, so it's probably all kinds of wrong.  I translated the text from the French version, and did my best to wrangle it into paragraph form.  (The original was a list of facts).
I'm sure there are huge informational gaps in here, but I know nothing about the topic, and chose it merely to exercise my mad translation skizzles.--Ddsilver 18:55, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Created
Talk:Hot Hot Heat

message: What??? Hot Hot Heat is NOT a " Synth pop/Dance-punk rock band". They are an alternative band, perhaps a rock band, but they feature guitars too prominently to be considered synth pop or dance-punk. - Bagel7
:I think the most appropriate label would be indie rock.  What does Allmusic.com say? WesleyDodds 06:28, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Last.fm says indie rock and alternative. Sounds fair to me. --Anthony5429 12:13, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Er, I doubt Scenes One Through Thirteen can be called Synth Pop. At least, it seems too noizy to me. But hey, I might be wrong. But it's also wrong to assume they previously were synth pop without listening to their older music. Someone should clear this up, and I know I can't >_< --MooNFisH 23:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: This kind of ends at '05, not talking about their success after Elevator.  I don't know much about them, but I think someone should expand the bio.
Patinthehat1 19:08, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography

message: didnt chart at #18 in the uk. fix it.
ive removed it, it was never in the top 40, was it even released as a single in the uk? Postmoderner 14:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: iou

message: There's been some vandalism to the Members section. I tried to correct it but I'm not even sure who the current members are. Any help? 129.215.149.97 (talk) 20:19, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Members
Talk:Adams River (New Zealand)

message: There's also the Adams River in British Columbia, noted for its salmon run/spawning grounds, a tributary of the Thompson (via Shuswap Lake); it doesn't have an article currently (so far as I can tell) but this will have to be dab'd when it does (amazingly, there's no Adams River in the U.S...such a common name you'd think there would be....).Skookum1 20:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Will need a dab
Talk:Supernova (American band)

message: What should the disambiguation look like?  I tried to put in the otheruses thing(?), but it shows up as disambig for "Supernova (band)", which maybe it should actually be.  It would be like a sub-disambiguation page, since there are two Supernova bands.  What do you think? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Jack Nash (talk • contribs) 09:05, May 22, 2006
:I just want to make this article, Supernova (Rock Star band), easily accessable from this page, as I believe it will soon become relevant to how we proceed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eric Jack Nash (talk • contribs) 20:20, May 23, 2006
I made a disambiguation page. I'm not exactly sure the best way to do it, feel free to edit it.-Frank- 00:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am admittedly not familiar with the pop/punk Supernova, however by looking at their Myspace page I was unable to see how this band is notable by Wikipedia's standards.  Are there people who think this band is notable or should this redirect to the Rockstar band page? Jtrost (T | C | #) 20:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop/punk band notability? 

message: Ages 3 & Up to Supernova (American band)
See WP:NALBUM: All articles on albums, singles or other recordings must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. I added a ref from Allmusic to the album's article, but could not find significant coverage in reliable sources, just websites which confirmed it existed and is for sale. Boleyn (talk) 12:12, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:El Paso Corp.

message: Very early in page (as it stood 14 Feb 23) it says Kinder acquired EPG in 2012. Just before the section "Criticism" it says 2011. The article cited for the 2011 date merely says the acquistion had been "announced". This could have been the announcement of an INTENTION to attempt an acquisition. I have other reasons to think it was 2021, but not strong enough evidence to change the page. I went to the page hoping to find the date! Tom  — Preceding undated comment added 09:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: When was Kinder acquisition?

message: This article, especially the history, could be merged into El Paso Natural Gas. The history is the story of El Paso Natural Gas. it should be noted that the history in the format it is in now could be considered plagiarized. Starlighsky (talk) 03:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with El Paso Natural Gas?
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Augsburg

message: This is clearly culled from a source with a particular, that is: partisan, point of view. Too much of the "history of Augsburg" is considered only from the point of view of the Roman Catholic Church. Many of the historical facts are correct, but the portrayal is clearly biased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.199.106 (talk • contribs) July 8 2006
: I concur; indeed, the real problem is how much is left out. One of Augsburg's distinct features is that Catholics and Protestants coexisted there for centuries before this was common in other parts of the world, and this fact is utterly overlooked. From 1802-1941, this history is exclusively that of Catholic Augsburg. It doesn't even mention the dissolution of the Reichsstadt, which became part of Bavaria in 1806; the diocese that was dissolved in 1802, which this article discusses, was distinct from the city of Augsburg proper. But I don't have the time to go in and fix this all myself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.146.129.97 (talk • contribs) April 22 2006
::The City of Augsburg was, in fact, not part of the Prince-Bishopric of Augsburg, which is the subject of this article.  After the Reformation, I don't think the Bishop even went to Augsburg - his seat was at Dillingen. john k (talk) 00:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. I've split the article of the Catholic diocese apart from the state of the HRE. Benkenobi18 (talk) 23:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Should we not list Dillingen as an additional capital of the Bishopric, since Augsburg was not actually the seat of the later bishops? john k (talk) 00:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Capital?
Talk:The Message (Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five album)

message: To whom it may concern,
Myself and 2 other classmates(RA4242 & luvnomi) who are studying Wikipedia are interested in improving this article and take it towards featured article status.
I feel that a lot of information is needed in order to move this article toward becoming a featured article. The article as it stands  is lacking in facts and details. It could also do with improving the quality of the context and addressing any errors which might be present in the current textHajiHaji (talk) 12:13, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: There's apparently no lyrics on this album.--203.178.91.70 (talk) 00:26, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personnell 