Talk:Thatching

message: ---Needs to be rewritten--- 
Under "Thatch Material":  
"There are more thatched roofs in the the hood and the slums than in any other European country"
Makes no sense.  Compare what to what?  When rewording this, please omit the slang phrase "the hood" which is a shortened form of "neighborhood".
Adriennes (talk) 21:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: ... with :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Plague
"Thatched roofs (which had provided splendid places for rats to live) were also forbidden within the city, and remain forbidden under modern codes"
Seems to have been forgotten !!! But I think that if you have rats living above your head, you end up automatically having dust charged with rat's fecaes particles and much worst into your food, and you multiply the chances of interspecies diseaes transmission !!!!
How does a rat live in a densely packed mass of thatch? and don't they prefer nice holes in the ground? Mice are more your loft dwellers. GraemeLeggett 19:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  a link should be added 

message: I know little about thatching but this page has become propaganda.  It doesn't even really cover thatching so much as it covers thatched rooves of which there is already an article.  Editing is needed. --Ryuukuro 16:58, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Propaganda

message: Under the section "Flammability" it says they are at no greater risk from fire than other roofs but under "Disadvantages is says they are. Which is right? 172.188.149.60 10:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flammabilty 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 17:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: I believe that Norfolk reed is still harvested commercially from the Norfolk Broads, and what people supppose to be straw is often in fact reed. Sorry do not know the details. 78.149.201.215 (talk) 13:44, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norfolk Reed 

message: I'm not an expert on thatching but as I understand it the best quality thatch is a reed thatch, and this is unlikely to last 50 years (30 years would be more realistic) so to claim a straw thatch would last this length of time seems to be stretching it a bit. Can anyone provide a reference for this part of the article?--Ykraps (talk) 16:35, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  50 years! 

message: Sedge currently appears only in the introduction, where the link is misleading. So have added the generum (Cladium mariscus) temporarily there for now. Material at this site might be usefil for improving the materials section? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:07, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sedge 

message: There is a reference to a law (Plant Variety and Seeds Act 1964) that supposedly prohibits the use of an old variety of wheat in the EU. This is a UK-specific law and has existed for much longer than the UK has been a member of the European Union. Maybe this needs to be reformulated?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.218.220.8 (talk) 15:41, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  EU law 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Thatching. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090726070521/http://www.polynesia.com/fiji/fijian-houses.htm to http://www.polynesia.com/fiji/fijian-houses.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120111063005/http://www.hct.ac.uk/Downloads/cp_thatch.html to http://www.hct.ac.uk/Downloads/cp_thatch.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121225205652/http://www.thatchingadvisoryservices.co.uk/Thatch_Guide.asp to http://www.thatchingadvisoryservices.co.uk/Thatch_Guide.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120328175612/http://www.addictedtotravel.com/holidays/snow-country to http://www.addictedtotravel.com/holidays/snow-country
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150501204845/http://www.hlcollege.ac.uk/Downloads/cp_thatch.html to http://www.hlcollege.ac.uk/Downloads/cp_thatch.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815061733/http://www.europanostra.org/projects/53/ to http://www.europanostra.org/projects/53/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: So... this photoessay. Look, I don't want to be a jerk: it's nice, it's interesting, it's germane, it's not hurting anybody. Why not? And I'm nobody's idea of a WikiLawyer. I think clearly the whole thing's going to have to go, ultimately, but I'm not exactly here to push for its removal. I just want to get in there and edit it, and the way it's written makes me a little balky. After I post this, I'm going to go prune the most egregious typos and grammatical errors. Fine; but it needs more than that, and unlike the rest of WP, which belongs to me as much as anyone and which I never scruple to clean up so long as it's just a matter of grammar or clarity, this is very much some particular person's thing.
Thoughts?
Regulov (talk) 15:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it does not belong in Wikipedia, but since it has been sitting there unchallenged for seven months, I will not delete without hearing what others think. - Donald Albury 18:40, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there have been no opposing views, I took the liberty to delete it from this article. It does indeed not belong here. --Ulkomaalainen (talk) 10:48, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The photoessay 

message: The line "There are about 60,000 thatched roofs in the UK, of which 50–80 suffer a serious fire each year, most of these being completely destroyed. The cost to the Fire Brigade is £1.3m per annum" isn't really very useful without a comparison with other types of roofs.  Iapetus (talk) 13:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Disadvantages" / fire stats 

message: Hello all, shall the following be added to that section?
 
Both pictures and descriptions come from the current and past versions of Dark_earth. -- Ktsquare (talk) 00:23, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Thatching#Advantages]] 

message: Surely these two paragraphs contradict each other?:
Technological change in the farming industry significantly affected the popularity of thatching. The availability of good quality thatching straw declined in England after the introduction of the combine harvester in the late 1930s and 1940s, and the release of short-stemmed wheat varieties. Increasing use of nitrogen fertiliser in the 1960s–70s also weakened straw and reduced its longevity. Since the 1980s, however, there has been a big increase in straw quality as specialist growers have returned to growing older, tall-stemmed, "heritage" varieties of wheat such as Squareheads Master (1880), N59 (1959), Rampton Rivet (1937), Victor (1910) and April Bearded (early 1800s) in low input/organic conditions.
In the UK it is illegal under the Plant Variety and Seeds Act 1964 (with many amendments) for an individual or organisation to give, trade or sell seed of an older variety of wheat (or any other agricultural crop) to a third party for growing purposes, subject to a significant fine. Because of this legislation, thatchers in the UK can no longer obtain top quality thatching straw grown from traditional, tall-stemmed varieties of wheat.
Grunners (talk) 08:14, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction in 'material' section