lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Legumes

message: There's also a :Category:Fabaceae which covers exactly the same ground (Fabaceae being merely the scientific name for legumes) - I reckon the two categories should be combined. I don't have any strong opinion which name should be used, what do others think? - MPF 00:01, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Category:Legumes fits well with the always use common names ideal, and it also negates the problem of Fabaceae/Leguminoseae confusion. --nixie 00:20, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: ditto -- WormRunner | Talk 04:01, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:1987 New Brunswick general election

message: How did this Assembly run? Were there alot of free votes, or was it like a mini-dictatorship?
Keeperoftheseal 17:21, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Procedure? 

message: I remember hearing that they split the party into moderate/left leaning wings so as to have the appearence of an opposition?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.237.95.62 (talk) 10:27, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split the party? 

message: Link to the Report of the Chief Electoral Officer is broken. The link is here.
Don'tDropThatTotoro (talk) 03:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done by yourself. Stickee (talk) 04:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 November 2015
Talk:Bastet

message: The section, "In popular culture", contains a "Main article:" link to "Ancient Egyptian deities in popular culture § Bastet" - but that redirects to "Egyptian influence in popular culture" which contains no mention whatsoever of Bast (that I could find).
Something is obviously broken, but I don't know enough to say what, or what the correct solution would be... AndreaStar (talk) 05:23, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The page it links to was deleted but the new page it redirects to doesn't have a section for Bastet. I guess the solution would be to add some entries for Bastet either here or on that new page, but making sure they're well-sourced ones as a lack of citations appears to be a big part of why that page was deleted. --Ringtail Raider (talk) 08:44, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link redirects to irrelevant page 

message: Could somebody with knowledge about the topic please complete the history?  It goes up to about 30 BC, and then just stops, without explanation. Kmasters0 (talk) 09:02, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:My Own Prison

message: The album set a record by being the 1st debut rock album to have 4 #1 hit singles ("One", "What's This Life For", "My Own Prison", and "Torn".)
Where have they been #1? What charts? Why does the table below tell something different? -- Harro 21:49, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: The sound of My Own Prison is more grungier than their other releases. But it is not known as a grunge sound. Yes it has many many characteristics and influences of the original grunge and their music and lead vocalist voice sounds very alike to those of Pearl Jam's Eddie Vedder. However, it is still not label as grunge. My Own Prison was label as Post-grunge which is the more radio-friendlier version of grunge. Also, this album has a record label deal while many grunge bands from the 80s didn't sign to major record labels and didn't promote their sound and music like Creed did with My Own Prison during the late 90s. Sure a lot of grunge bands sign to indie record labels like Creed did with this album but the main different here is that their record label didn't promote their albums and their play shows in gigs. Creed in the other hand played shows at a large stadiums or heck even arenas and they were sold out. The sound of this album is also Post-grunge because post means after. Is not that post-grunge has nothing to do with grunge, it had a lot of things to do with grunge but post means that it is grunge from the era after the seattle one from the early 90s. My Own Prison was released in 1997 and they promoted it. 
This album is post-grunge and not original grunge.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikeis1996 (talk • contribs) 00:41, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is post-grunge and is not original grunge. 
Talk:Charles Edward Stuart

message: The current article says in part: "In 1743, Charles fought at the Battle of Dettingen, where the British army was led by his chief rival, King George II".
I can find no evidence for Charles fighting at Dettingen in any of the major biographies.  There is a chapter entitled "Dettingen" in G.A. Henty's book "Bonnie Prince Charlie" - but this book is not really about Charles Edward Stuart. Noel S McFerran 00:37, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Boston (band)

message: The redirect Adom (musician) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 22:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Adom (musician)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Adom (artist) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 22:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Adom (artist)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Hanjin

message: Someone has removed all the figures,i.e. revenue, profits, etc. Other shipping companies have this information.49.178.132.148 (talk) 10:45, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Profits
Talk:Vermilion, Ohio

message: Is that latest edition correct?  Is the stat that X% out of the total in poverty are in Y age bracket or is it that X% of those in Y age bracket are in poverty?  The two are very different things.
:We'll get right on that.  If you can provide some links to source material documenting how lame it is to live in or visit Vermilion, I'll add that information to the article.  Alternately, I could use information on how boring or stupid it is.  Dave (talk) 03:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Xaverian College

message: * Jonathan Isaacs – DJ, member of the group Dirty Mancs: suggest that reliable citation is found so notability is clarified.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 11:27, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dirty Mancs 

message: I was unable to verify the William "Billy" Hopkins claim in this article (under the former students section), and have replaced it with the author, Bill Keeth, and an accompanying full citation.--Soulparadox 17:15, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billy Hopkins citation 

message: Should add references to Brother Cyril. https://www.aidan.co.uk/interview-brother-cyril/#:~:text=Brother%20Cyril%20died%20on%20the,be%20felt%20on%20the%20campus. 82.21.55.166 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 00:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brother Cyril 

message: 86.4.59.251 made lots of edits to sixth form colleges in early 2022.
The edits to Ashton Sixth Form College have been reverted.
Some of the edits to Xaverian College feel a bit promotional and cut+paste from somewhere but my specific point here is the "It consistently ranks in the top 10 facilities for 16-18 education" citation needed.  How long should this remain citation needed before being edited to something else or dropped?  Even it it was top 10 in 2022 this needs updating. Mtpaley (talk) 23:54, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation needed edits from 86.4.59.251
Talk:Police perjury

message: It is not clear from the article whether this "slang" / associated practice is isolated to the US or not. I'm from the UK and I thought this sort of thing had stopped happening here, possibly even even twenty / thirty years ago. If it is maybe an explicit delaration of the same should be made near the beginning of the article. Maybe "US police slang" would be appropriate?
79.66.205.219 (talk) 21:53, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, and I've made that change. The article and references are all U. S. references. So it is indeed "U. S. police slang." Whether it's used outside the U. S. I wouldn't know, but "U. S. police slang" doesn't necessarily imply U. S. only. Dpbsmith (talk) 21:00, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  American-only Subject matter? 

message: Even though the current title of this article is "police perjury", it seems like the content is specifically about the term  testilying.
I think the title should be changed back to reflect the original purpose and the actual content.  Barring objections, I'll make the change in a couple of weeks.
69.158.90.85 (talk) 16:08, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a redirect that already takes that into account.  I also think that these are synonomous terms.  I think you are making a distinction with any practical difference. How many angels can dance on the head of a pin?  Just saying ... 7&6=thirteen (☎) 16:39, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did the title change without changing the content? 

message: Thanks for your recent contributions, 7&6. I see you added back the unsourced supposed Boston Globe editorial. As I said in my edit description, I searched the EbscoHost Newspaper Source database, which is supposed to include the Boston Globe, and I couldn't find a Boston Globe editorial from 2003 that included even simply the word "testilying", even though I found other Boston Globe articles from 2003 in that database. Given that, I'd say the burden of proof is on whoever wants to include that quotation, to find evidence that it actually did come from a Boston Globe editorial. Any objections to my removing it again? Jbening (talk) 05:46, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2003 Boston Globe editorial
Talk:M-commerce

message: Seems like a good idea. Mpntod 18:09, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically nothing against the suggestion. However, since this page needs some editing, it would be advisable not to merge them in a hurry. --Raj 23:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This sounds like a good suggestion.  GChriss 15:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with [[Mobile commerce]]
Talk:Nonlinear programming

message: Kindly add more real-life application of NLP in the main article. For example, in Finance (portfolio optimization), Operations (cutting and packing), Engineering (electricity generation & distribution), Transportation (traffic flow models), Economics (econometric and equilibrium models), Medical science (protocols in cancer radiotherapy), Nonlinear network flow models, and Training machine learning models.
Amit 08:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Applications

message: In the Examples section, the text describes things in terms of x1, x2, and (in the case of 3 dimensions) x3, while the illustrations depict things in terms of x, y and (in the case of 3 dimensions) z. For the sake of clarity, I think that the text and the images should agree in the naming of variables. Are there any objections to replacing x1, x2 and x3 in the example text with x, y and z? --134.173.66.89 22:52, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: If the objective function is convex in all cost functions (when looking from the "bottom")
Can the meaning of this condition be clarified?  This is especially confusing because both "objective function" and "cost function" have been used above this to refer to the function to be minimized. Josh Cherry 04:22, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convex 

message: Given optimization problem
\begin{matrix}
   \underset{x,y}{\mathop{\min }}\, & {{x}^{T}}y  \\
   {} & x\in {{\Omega }_{1}}  \\
   {} & y\in {{\Omega }_{2}}  \\
\end{matrix},<Br />
if we reach its solution by solve the following 2 problem one by one iteratively:
* Problem 1: 
:\begin{matrix}
   \underset{x}{\mathop{\min }}\, & {{x}^{T}}y  \\
   {} & x\in {{\Omega }_{1}}  \\
\end{matrix}
* Problem 2: 
:\begin{matrix}
   \underset{y}{\mathop{\min }}\, & {{x}^{T}}y  \\
   {} & y\in {{\Omega }_{2}}  \\
\end{matrix}.
How do we call this method? And is there an article concerning this algothrim in Wikipedia? Thanks you! --虞海 (Yú Hǎi) (talk) 08:35, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A question
Talk:Tasmanian House of Assembly

message: Sample diagrams - what do people think?  -- Chuq 02:31, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: discussion of the article

message: they havent been sworn in yet. Parliament diagram is incorrect Tasobserver (talk) 02:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  there is a mixture of the 51st parliament, in this article
Talk:Mike D

message: Mike D drowned Today- added info.
This is not a fansite (Hip-hop Royalty? - gimme a break!) Beerathon 14:29, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was. I set it so it was a link to NNDB.Retinarow 18:12, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: Okay, most of what I did was clean up the style and break things up into categories.  I added a few details, such as the pre-Beastie Boys punk band stuff and personal life info.  I also added the quotes section.  I went ahead and took down the clean up tag since I think it's about as clean as it's going to get without an expert on Mike D really beefing the page up.  Any other suggestions for clean up or any obvious mistakes I've made, please let me know. Crazytonyi 22:22, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up details 
Talk:Done with Mirrors

message: I must add that it was not Joe Perry who commented his dislikes for the album on That Metal Show, it was Kramer. I'll volunteer to make these changes. JRC3 (talk) 16:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Joey
Talk:Members of the Tasmanian House of Assembly, 1992–1996

message: If Brown resigned in 1993, who replaced him? Ambi 02:36, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question.  http://www.parliament.tas.gov.au/tpl/Elections/e1996Den.htm (which is the site I've used as my source) shows Peg Putt as a sitting member at the 1996 election, yet she wasn't elected at the 1992 election.  I'll update the article. -- Chuq 02:52, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops.. I should know my own state pollies, you would think! -- Chuq 03:28, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: *laugh* - I just read Bob Brown ;) Ambi 03:31, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: discussion of the article
Talk:John Candy

message: John was a guest on the Ontario based program Saturday Night at the Movies with Elwy Yost around 1982. John mentioned that his favorite actor was Peter Sellers. In the interview as well he mentioned Alec Guinness and spoke of his new movie It Came from Hollywood. See YouTube <ref>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXH3FpLXbNo<ref>. JHolicky (talk) 17:59, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interview on Saturday Night at the Movies (Circa 1982) 

message: I found this source  stating that Candy was born in Toronto and was raised in "the city's East York neighborhood," which is most likely referencing Newmarket. I think we should change his birthplace to Toronto. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 09:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  birthplace incorrect 

message: In the death section it says his children say he was unaware of his family's genetic history. Two sentences later the article says he dieted and exercised because of his family history. Which one is it? -WarthogDemon 20:50, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetic History Contradiction 

message: This is a very unrepresentative picture of the smiling, jovial John Candy. This picture looks like he's a member of the Blues Brothers or something.Bdavid1111 (talk) Bdavid1111 (talk) 01:39, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The picture should be one where he is more recognizable. Also, dark sunglasses should be avoided in pictures like these. I'd support anyone who can find a better version that is more representative of John Candy. Adam Clark(User_Talk) (email) 23:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a new picture that I hope better represents him  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vanishedman (talk • contribs) 00:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor picture 

message: How can you say his children claim
he was unaware of the genetic history yet just a few sentences later state he worked out with trainers because of his family health history? Wiki writers are left leaning biased idiots (not hard to see that) who claim
to be journalists??? A sixth grader (from the 70’s or 80’s anyway)could have spotted  that oxymoron. 96.45.99.168 (talk) 04:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double talk stupidly  

message: 1985 john candy 
summer rental 69.126.89.204 (talk) 05:57, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  John candy
Talk:Diluent

message: This page is on the "to be moved to Wiktionary" list. Simon 02:44, Nov 22, 2004 (UTC)
:I guess this has already been "transwikied". "Copying" makes mores sense than "moving", as the article as it has developed over the last fourteen years is more encyclopaedic now, and could use more encyclopaedic information to improve it.
--Craig (t|c) 02:19, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wicktionary "move" 

message: The fact that a diluent is used to dilute a substance for transportation begs the question: What happens when the diluted product reaches its destination? Is it "undiluted" so that it can be used in its original form? If it is, what is the process, especially for those products that are used as examples? If it isn't, then it seems to me that the dilution is actually the first step in how the material is processed, so it's not diluted solely for the purpose of transportation. Either way it seems to me that this information should be part of the article.
--Craig (t|c) 02:13, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information?
Talk:Permanent Vacation (Aerosmith album)

message: Does "Permanent Vacation" refer to the Jim Jarmusch movie?  Thx, Maikel (talk) 07:54, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Album title

message: Aerosmith is listed in List of glam metal bands and artists, and both Dude (Looks Like a Lady) and Angel (Aerosmith song) are listed as "glam metal" under "genre." 
Yet Permanent Vacation (Aerosmith album) is not listed as glam metal, and my edit to list it as such was reverted.
It is quite obviously at least partially within the glam metal style of music, and this genre classification should be added to the existing classification of "hard rock."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.239.95.121 (talk) 14:25, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glam Metal
Talk:Pump (album)

message: How can you tell if you got the 2001 remaster? Normally the case or CD would include the year of the reissue and the original year, but the CD I got only has a sticker on the wrapper that said it was 96k / 24-bit remastered. Aren't all old albums "remastered" the first time they are put onto CD already? --blm07 17:00, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2001 version? 

message: In article I read that "Janie's Got a Gun" is a single form "Pump" album. But it's not listed on track list. And when you click on French version of this article you can see that there are 14 tracks on this album not 10. Can someone make that clear, please?
Aradek 09:12, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The French version is incorrect. There are only 10 tracks on this album, and some tracks are actually two parts. Janie's Got a Gun is the second part of track 5. --blm07 17:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  track listing 
Talk:One mind

message: This page results from my decision to proceed with personal metaphysical studies that accept a concept of One mind but a search on Google produced an overwhelming number of references which obviously violated the definition which I offer here. One of the references that did correspond to my concept was on the hyponoesis web site. I am producing this page with hopes that it will find a group of people who accept this as a working definition that is much narrower than is current in web pages.
O1thomas 03:17, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pentagonal orthocupolarotunda

message: just fixed misspelling on johnson solid that propegated through my working set of pages.  This is why I just shifted Pentagonal orthocupolarontunda to Pentagonal orthocupolarotunda.  -- Andrew Kepert 03:28, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled section 

message: Can the cupolarotunda also be called the rotundacupola? Kittenono (talk) 02:50, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no reason why not. —Tamfang (talk) 19:22, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cupolarotunda
Talk:Franz Rosenzweig

message: Unfortunately I don't know a lot about Rosenzweig (which is why I was looking at this page in the first place), but there MUST be plenty more about him. 'Star of Redemption' has been very influential, it might even be worth starting a new page for that and including a summary of the principle argument of the book. There should probably also be a separate page about the Lehrhaus, since this was a very influential institution. Alas, it's all far later than my areas of specialization, but please, is there someone out there who can make this less of a stub and more of a serious, content-filled article?? Thanks in advance.... Liskeardziz
Here, here. It would be great if we could get some insight into what his philosophical views actually were. Indeed, for some, being highly critical of Hegel is less a philosophical description than a criterion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.192.112.144 (talk) 16:12, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's expand this page 

message: The comment has been made that the Star of Redemption needs a separate page, and so does Freies Jüdisches Lehrhaus. In the meantime, if someone wants to link to Freies Jüdisches Lehrhaus, they can only link to Educational activities, which is a silly name for this section. But what should the title of the section be— Free Jewish Learning House? Freies Jüdisches Lehrhaus? Free Jewish Lehrhaus? The Frankfurt Jewish Lehrhaus? Vagabond nanoda (talk) 04:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retitling the ''Educational activities'' section
Talk:General Motors Lambda platform

message: VX1NG (talk) 16:54, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subaru Connection? 
Talk:Port Newark–Elizabeth Marine Terminal

message: I had to delete the reference to the port being the second busiest as Long Beach.  I read in 
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/22/nyregion/22port.html?pagewanted=print&position=
that the port was # 3, the article did not give one and two.  
dinopup
Publications of American Association of Port Authorities usually list Port of Los Angeles or adjacent Port of Long Beach (they both share San Pedro Bay) as either #1 or #2, depending upon criteria used(e.g., total value of imports, total tonnage, total number of containers), with Port of New York and New Jersey (which includes Port Newark-Elizabeth) almost always taking #3 rank, ever since 1990.209.244.188.157 04:03, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the sentences calling the terminal "one of the highest-risk terrorist target sites in the U.S." The cite given is a newspaper article that quotes an unnamed, undated New York Times article that I could not find.
The facility is considered to be one of the highest-risk terrorist target sites in the United States. Other such sites in New Jersey include the Holland Tunnel and the PATH station at Exchange Place, both of which are in Jersey City, and the Lincoln Tunnel, which connects nearby Weehawken to Manhattan.Pope, Gennarose. (February 5, 2012). "Two most dangerous miles in the U.S.". The Union City Reporter.
PRRfan (talk) 23:23, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks; added. PRRfan (talk) 15:04, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terror text removed pending cite