Talk:Raymond S. Bradley

message: Leave off the speedy stuff, I've only just started it. Have some patience please William M. Connolley 21:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Putting up your  blog buddy,  WMC, isn't very respectable .... J. D. Redding 14:44, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Please leave the ref format alone: there is an arbcomm judgement on this. VFD? Would be a waste of time, so... William M. Connolley 16:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: WMC POV editing and reckless opinion removed: 
* According to Bradley's point of view (derived from various statistical studies and energy balance models)
* (alluding to his belief that McIntyre and McKitrick's work did not properly go through the peer review system). Some have wondered why Bradley did not archive his data sets for future review.  
;References  
*  Variations of the Earth’s surface temperature   
*  Letters Requesting Information Regarding Global Warming Studies; Letter to Dr. Raymond S. Bradley, requesting information regarding global warming studies.   
*  Irene Sege, "Inhospitable climate; Political storm over global warming swirls around a UMass professor". Boston Globe.    
*  "Interview With Ray Bradley; Interview with Ray Bradley". CNN.com.   
*  "Bradley’s Data Archiving". climateaudit.org, July 2005. 
; External articles
* Climate System Research Center  (a site that he is averse to it seems from his editiing pattern)
J. D. Redding 11:16, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Reddi, this is silly. Wiki-ing "Perspective (cognitive)" for "point of view" is just so typically pointless and you. And asserting that it *is* Bradleys POV is silly too: its better to refer to what his actual work says. William M. Connolley 11:59, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WMC POV

message: In all of the climatologists' pages here on Wikipedia associated with the climate change debate and the IPCC I've yet to see one mentioning schools attended and degrees achieved. Furthermore, outside links listed on said articles also don't relieve my curiosity on what they actually studied. Some don't even list the types of degrees. Can anyone clarify? For example, after spending a few minutes using Google, I was able to come up with "Ph.D. 1974, M.A., 1971 University of Colorado, Boulder. B.Sc. 1969 University of Southampton, England" for Dr. Bradley but were these degrees in computer science or electrical engineering or what? I'm really curious for two reasons now; why they are not listed and why they seem to be unimportant enough to ignore. Thanks for your help. An acquaintance told me of this odd fact and it is one of those things you chuckle at until you find it is true. --Traumatic (talk) 01:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schools? Majors? 

message: Per Talk:Michael E. Mann William M. Connolley (talk) 15:05, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rv: why 

message: I've reverted the fact tags, which weren't very useful. Discussion of Hughes can go on Hughes page. TW: are you still claiming to be an uninvolved admin? William M. Connolley (talk) 08:25, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed a ref to wikipedia use this instead  mark nutley (talk) 10:00, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagging 

message: I have reverted a number of dishonest edits which were clearly intended, in my opinion, to create disruption.  --Climate surfer 23 (talk) 10:29, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You're a sock William M. Connolley (talk) 12:15, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dishonest edits. 

message: Probably http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4032-9519 - but needs further verification. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:47, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ORCID