Talk:Living street

message: Is it a Living street or a woonerf? On the Dutch radio they told that in the English Language there isn't an english word for this. See Woonerf and nl:woonerf. 84.31.63.205 22:03, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The English technical equivalent of the woonerf is the Home Zone Maplefanta (talk) 08:45, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

text: –I completely disagree. this article is describing the theory of a living street and does so in a very neutral fashion. i have removed your dispute of neutrality. Maximilian77 (talk) 02:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The NPOV policy states "It is important to remember that the NPOV dispute tag does not mean that an article actually violates NPOV. It simply means that there is an ongoing dispute about whether the article complies with a neutral point of view or not. In any NPOV dispute, there will be some people who think the article complies with NPOV, and some people who disagree. In general, you should not remove the NPOV dispute tag merely because you personally feel the article complies with NPOV. Rather, the tag should be removed only when there is a consensus among the editors that the NPOV disputes have indeed been resolved." Learn to read. 205.153.156.221 (talk) 22:44, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you actually know any planning concepts that would not be 'pro', it is pretty particular about the profession. Woonerf concept is pro-woonerf, Shared Space is pro-shared space, eco-city is pro-eco-city and etc.. That tag does not really have any uses in here unless someone wants to play a childgame. Maplefanta (talk) 08:45, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Living street or woonerf?

message: I can't help noticing that lead image has no people in it at all. Surely that is not really the point. Would it be better to use a picture with children playing and adults spotting and chatting etc? PeterEastern (talk) 09:38, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could we use a lead image with some people in it? 

message: The article has two major problems:
#It is completely unreferenced
#Its interwikis and country-specific cases present a good deal of confusion. I have read several non-English wikis and see that many of them are something akin to but not exactly as "living street" and "shared zone". 
To fix this, we need :
*(a) to write country-specific articles (I added two red links)
*(b) Provide solid references which 
**(b1) Clearly discuss the concept of "living street"
**(b2) Clearly establish relations with similar concepts, such as "woonref", "shared zone", etc. 
Otherwise, I am afraid I will start to delete big chunks as a well-meaning, but nevertheless original research, for the reason I mentioned above: while in general the concept is understandable, in detail there is quite a lot of confusion. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:09, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree with you. I have spent a couple of hours doing some initial structural work on the articles to remove the considerable duplication across the many similar articles. Assuming that there are no big objections to these changes the next stage will be to work on the quality of this article and then the articles for each country. Personally I am also interested in adding background content about the 'Safe Streets for Children’s Play' in New York (implemented first in 1909) which were later imported into the UK with the 'Street Playgrounds Act 1938'. See Play streets in London timeline for details.PeterEastern (talk) 19:18, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Living street. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070721025550/http://www.homezones.org.uk/public/images/legislation/signing_02.jpg to http://www.homezones.org.uk/public/images/legislation/signing_02.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified