lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Elasund

message: I think this article should be called simple "Elasund", as that is the way people refer to the game and how they are likely to look it up.  If an article is created about the fictional city of Elasund as it relates to the novel, then KevSYC's latest point might have more weight, but until then, I believe that games subtitles are as unnecessary in article titles as book subtitles are.  Move history:
* 05:46, 20 February 2007 KelvSYC moved Elasund to Elasund: The First City over redirect: Subtitle is significant - Elasund by itself refers to the Catan novel's setting, while The First City refers to the game itself
* 13:50, 9 November 2006 JHunterJ moved Elasund: The First City to Elasund: Use most common name; see also Wikipedia:Naming conventions (books)#Subtitles
* 20:34, 6 November 2006 KelvSYC moved Elasund to Elasund: The First City: Subtitles form part of the full name, and is thus necessary
* 20:07, 15 September 2006 JHunterJ moved Elasund: The First City to Elasund: revert move; subtitle not needed in article title
* 19:37, 15 September 2006 KelvSYC moved Elasund to Elasund: The First City: move to full title
-- JHunterJ 14:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, the novel isn't called Elasund, it's called Die Siedler von Catan.  Apparently it includes reference to the city of Elasund within. -- JHunterJ 17:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Discuss before moving, not discuss while moving.  Consensus (above) was established.  There may be other editors who agree with you (and disagree with me and dcclark above).  If so, a move may be warranted, but not until then. -- JHunterJ (talk) 02:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When was consensus established?  I disagree with your position, we don't have consensus. Plain and simple.  What you are doing is contrary to what's established in the articles I cited, and I don't think that it's appropriate to cite book naming convention for board games when the opposite is applying to much more relevant media.  If you still feel the same way, you can take it up with the people who decide things over at WP:NAME - I currently have an RFC at its talk page. kelvSYC (talk) 04:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles you cite do not establish consensus here; consensus here was established before and can certainly be shown to have changed, simple yes, but not plain unless another editor agrees with you.  You made a bold edit (move), it was reverted, and now we're discussing here, and I guess at WT:NAME#RFC: Subtitles in naming -- JHunterJ (talk) 10:50, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name
Talk:Juneteenth (novel)

message: This article seems to be mostly incorrect. 
Check here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/15/AR2007081501365_2.html
Juneteenth is not a condensation of the full work in progress, but only involves 1/4 of the work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.205.34.195 (talk) 16:56, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where is its Plot section? At least let's put in a banner explaining that the article is lacking one. - Joaquin89uy (talk) 00:24, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Buddha Film

message: : I am unable to understand how Ian Meissmart says that both the articles are about the new Buddha film, in essence they are, but please be informed there are several films named 'Buddha' and the ones in discussion are separate projects. Pls. read the article before you place deletion instructions. The one I created Buddha Film is written by D.K.Goel and is being directed by Sreedhar Allani and is scheduled for release during 2007, where the other one Buddha (film is by Thich Nhat Hanh (book) and written by David S. Ward and is scheduled for release in 2008. The view of other Wikipedians is the same as mine, which means the articles are not be merged as they talk about different projects, though the title of the film is the same. I am ending the discusssion here. You may go ahead with the deletion of the article if you wish.  I am creating a new article Buddha (2007 film) as recommended by the user Tikiwont. I hope you will be more prudent while placing deletion instructions and will take a little more care by reading the articles in detail before taking such a step. Yugeshp 14:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Subahdar

message: This article should be merged with the articleSubah.Joy1963 08:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Montana 1948

message: Is the summation so poorly written?
It sounds as though a ten year old wrote it.
Summery of the novel isn't very well written. I'd write it out myself if the book wasn't so badly written itself. Inferioralphamale 12:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: montana 1948 is novel set in north dakota  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.13.177 (talk) 07:07, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  montana
Talk:Sutanuti

message: Surely the more logical spelling is "Satanati"? 188.221.129.72 (talk) 23:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: What logic?--Dwaipayan (talk) 08:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sutanuti or Satanati 

message: Text from this page has been presumptively removed as a copyright violation, please see: Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20100917. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violations presumptively removed
Talk:Old Angel Midnight

message: Beleive it was published in 1973 by Booklegger as evidence 
But the Jack Kerouac bibliography article has a publication date of 1955.
Either way the 1993 date in the Infobox looks wrong - watch this space GrahamHardy (talk) 17:10, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Found this site  which states it was written in 1956 and published in 1973 which sounds reasonable! I will check wikipedia dates against it GrahamHardy (talk) 17:25, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication history 

message: "Old Angel Midnight" was published in 1959 in the first issue of a new literary magazine, Big Table, which billed itself as "The complete contents of the suppressed winter 1959 Chicago Review.  The editors were Irving Rosenthal and Paul Carroll.
I believe that this was the first publication.76.199.9.141 (talk) 22:28, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Publication (?)
Talk:Telangana Rebellion

message: One of the film's protagonists is based on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komaram_Bheem who " led a protracted low intensity rebellion against the feudal Nizams of Hyderabad in the eastern part of the princely state during the 1930s, which contributed in the culmination of the Telangana Rebellion of 1946." CrickedBack (talk) 11:05, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @CrickedBack We need sources for that. I don't see any on RRR (film) — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should there be a section on the film RRR being partly inspired by this rebellion?
Template talk:India-hist-stub

message: A sugestion: can we have an image of the Ashoka Pillar instead of a map of South Asia. Ashoka Pillar is an internationally recognised symbol of India and Indian culture both in modern and historic sense. --Deepak D'Souza (talk • contribs) 05:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Makes sense. deeptrivia (talk) 05:50, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any particular reason for the particular image (:Image:BuddhaHead.JPG) that forms part of the template now? --Bhadani (talk) 16:13, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestion regarding image
Talk:Travancore–Cochin

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus. Some editors commenting find that using an n-dash is preferable for a combined entity created out of two separate entites, according to MOS rules. Others note that the move Austria–Hungary to Austria-Hungary had clear consensus when it was made 10 years ago and that this was added to MOS (although there was not a discussion specifically about adding it to MOS). Both these arguments are plausible ones, so overall I'm not finding a consensus either way.   (t · c) buidhe 04:44, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Travancore–Cochin →  – this is a procedural nomination, without recommendation, in search of a consensus on whether to use a hyphen or an endash.This article was moved in mid-2020 to its current title @Ab207, with the rationale . That move was apparently undiscussed, but it a perfectly valid rationale for a speedy move, so no criticism.However, that udiscussed move has left this head article out-of-synch with its eponymous :Category:Travancore-Cochin and with related articles such as 1952 Travancore-Cochin Legislative Assembly election. If this discussion establishes a consensus one way or the other, then the categories and other articles can be speedily moved to match the outcome here. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 March 2021 

message: See Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 March 21#Travancore–Cochin, where I propose standardising the category names to one form or the other.  As with the article title, I don't care which form is chosen.
It would be helpful if the CFD discussion could be free of the bogus allegations of procedural impropriety by McCandlish. It is bizarre that McCandlish chose to falsely accuse me of trying to get the category to drive the article title, when my nomination explicitly stated that I had no preference on the article title, and just sought consensus.It is equally bizarre that McCandlish falsely asserted that I should have used WP:C2D; the C2D criterion was not applicable here, because there was no consensus on the article title. McCandlish's bogus allegations were a time-wasting falsehood which disrupted the RM, so I hope that the CFD can avoid such nonsense. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:Yaudheya

message: Request received to merge articles: Yaudheya Kingdom into Yaudheya; dated: Jan 2020. 
Proposer's Rationale: e.g. Kuru Kingdom does not have separate articles for the mythological and historical kingdoms.
Discuss here. Chan-Paton factor (talk) 17:54, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected, rather than merging, given that there is no referenced content that is not already here. Klbrain (talk) 21:18, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion 

message: The region between Indus and Ganges was called Bahudhanyaka and was under the rule of these Yaudheyas. The same region has been called Bhadanaka by Rajshekhar in Tilakmanjari in 10th Century AD. The Bhadana-ka rulers were defeated by the Chauhans of Ajmer in the 12th Century AD and were retired to present day Haryana (and neighbouring regions of Rajasthan). The Real Rana (talk) 11:22, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bahudhanyaka state
Talk:Zain-ul-Abidin

message: Probably Satush making the Shamira dynasty as Tajik (politically motivated) as the Tajiks resemble the Kashmiris and are neighbours of Kashmir. see original borsders of Kashmir State.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.88.155 (talk) 18:57, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It was not - see this. Now please stop these ridiculous personal attacks, which you are spreading using various IPs in a close range around New York. - Sitush (talk) 02:27, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tajik origin

message: There seems no mention of Zain-ul-abidin's early life or influences here. Perhaps would be a good idea to include. -Ambar wiki (talk) 07:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zain-ul-abidin's early life 

message: , you have made a large number of edits without any edit summaries. Please explain what you are trying to do. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 12:42, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Template talk:Citation/core

message: Support for COinS was removed in 2012 due to performance issues. The majority of CS1 templates have been migrated to Lua, but a few of the lesser used CS1 templates still use core, as well as a number of specific-source templates. Given that the use per page is going to be fairly low, I think we can restore COinS support. --  Gadget850 talk 13:43, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  COinS 

message: Template:Citation/core includes this:
:These templates have been converted to use Module:Citation/CS1 so no longer use 
:*Template:Citation
:*Template:Cite book
:*...
This implies that Template:Citation is CS1. I thought Template:Citation is CS2. Clarification, please. —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:40, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It implies no such thing. It implies that  uses the same underlying software module as the CS1 citations. The module's name happens to have "CS1" in it. That's not the same thing as being part of the same style. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:42, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template:Citation]]: CS1 or CS2? 

message: Broken link in reference
* adds the specified HTML class to the span that encloses the citation. The name must be one word (separate words are separate classes) and must meet the name rules.
ref
/ref
;should be,
 ,i.e. http://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_global_class.asp
Sechinsic (talk) 21:36, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct on how classes work. The template applies two classes: citation which has CSS for highlighting and a specific class for each template. Where is the problem? -- Gadget850 talk 21:48, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that  means that of the two w3schools links that they posted above, the first one throws a HTTP 404 error. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:16, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha! The link in the unprotected documentation is bad. -- Gadget850 talk 22:18, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  -- Gadget850 talk 22:20, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Editing past my bedtime.Sechinsic (talk) 22:26, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 27 March 2015 

message: Hi. Currently, the template appears to only have 188 transclusions due to the migration to Module:Citation/CS1 - maybe full protection is too much? --DannyS712 (talk) 05:34, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reduce protection?
Talk:Randy Owen

message: This article has Randy dying the same day as Jeff Cook 137.118.161.59 (talk) 00:38, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death? 

message: Perhaps Randy has been resurrected 🙄 2603:8081:3801:8916:39AF:B443:9B94:9191 (talk) 22:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death?
Talk:Prince Igor

message: I'm not familiar enough with the technical details of creating internal links within Wikipedia to achieve a correct link the the Shostakovich book, Testimony.  As my edit now stands, it links to the correct entry, but the text in the Prince Igor article still says "Testimony (book)."  Would someone more at ease with technical matters hereabouts kindly help out?  Heaventree of Stars 15:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: In the mid-term I plan to expland the synopsis. Unfortunately, my copy of the libretto is of the Mariinsky edition which differs especially in Act I Sc 2 (traditional numbering) and Act III from the Rimsky edition. If someone has a libretto for that version, I should like to co-operate with them on this piece of work. --Peter cohen 13:44, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding the Synopsis, different editions 

message: I've included inline citations in my latest additions to the article. I would plan to do so on further changes I make and also on anything I can source from what I have (the booklet to the Philips recording). Could people with other sources please add referencing too. For example, if someone has Testimony it would be helpful if they could identify the page ref to the Glazunov admission. Thanks.--Peter cohen 13:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Fifi: I was aware of that fact as I wrote the statement. I do not know exactly when RK made his statement (during the composition of his memoirs, obviously), and defaulted to the publication date (1909) as being the earliest point I can find that the practice of omitting Act 3 is mentioned. The point is, it was pretty damn early! Ivan Velikii 02:01, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem solved. Thank you for "inspiring" me to find a solution (in the end, very simple) to that problem. Ivan Velikii 02:04, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing. 
Talk:Streetboarding

message: As far as I'm aware, they're both different terms for exactly the same thing. The two articles are also very similar. Any reason why they shouldn't be merged and redirected? Any preference with regards to which one you'd rather keep? I THINK streetboarding is a more widespread term. --89.243.236.241 (talk) 04:24, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Pivotboard 

message: This article's content is almost entirely copied from Snakeboard by a user who apparently did not know how to merge and redirect.  I think that Streetboarding should be the canonical article (although perhaps eventually split into board and boarding as Skateboard is) because the article (well, both articles, of course) give that as the current name, and the old name is/was a trademark.  Comments?  If no one objects, I'll just do the merge; it should be relatively straightforward.  --Tardis 15:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge in Snakeboard 

message: I've started to re-write the history and add some pictures, we should really try and get this up to the standard of the Skateboard article. (Deplorableword 08:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates
Talk:Elkington Silver Electroplating Works

message: I am beginning to think this article should be titled Museum of Science and Industry, Birmingham as it seems to have been formally known as the Museum of Science and Industry. Any objections?  Oosoom Talk to me 15:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now moved. Oosoom Talk to me 19:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Museum of Science and Industry, Birmingham 

message: Is the LMS Princess Coronation Class class locomotive City of Birmingham still encased inside the museum? Bob talk 11:14, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  City of Birmingham locomotive 

message: Does https://www.glancynicholls.com/work/the-engine-room relate? Jackiespeel (talk) 17:36, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates
Talk:East Lyme, Connecticut

message: Why is there a huge list of cemeteries?  Is East Lyme known for them?  If so, could someone add a paragraph explaining the pertinence of the list.  At the moment it seems like a directory.  Thanks -- Siobhan Hansa 18:30, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cemeteries 

message: I took a whole bunch of photos of the town (I live in it). And will add them to the article where needed, I'll also add in some fairly 'locally and sometimes otherwise' well known local 'destinations'. 
Although in my opinion the town itself is fairly boring,.... :-) Nateland 18:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  hell... photos!  

message: I was in Niantic/East Lyme in April and it looked like Constantine's was closed. Does anyone know if it's temporary or permanent? trepto (talk) 04:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constantine's 

message: The etymology should be included.Curb Chain (talk) 23:16, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eytomology 

message: Where are the Indian Woods in East Lyme....  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.193.68.17 (talk) 18:09, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indian Woods 

message: Change in all instances from "www.eltownhall.com" to "eltownhall.com"
Note: eltownhall.com is the preferred URL for the town web site.
RE: In the External Links section
1. The East Lyme Police do not have a separate web site. The URL for the East Lyme Police is eltownhall.com/government/departments/police/
2. Add URL "www.DiscoverEastLyme.com" 137.103.101.102 (talk) 15:40, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Partly done: The town's and police's websites were updated. The provenance of the third website is unknown. Spintendo      22:16, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2018
Portal talk:United Kingdom/Featured article

message: #REDIRECT Portal talk:United Kingdom
See a list at Portal:United Kingdom/Featured -- ALoan (Talk) 15:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I made an updated list (which actually took longer than setting up the subpages etc.) at Portal:United Kingdom/Featured article/List. the wub "?!" 23:05, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Substitute (Izabella Scorupco song)

message: The song which Scorupco sang in 1990 is the same song as Clout had a hit with in 1978. Maybe we should have only one article about the song, since it's like that in other cases with songs. Calle Widmann (talk) 10:07, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be Substitute (The Righteous Brothers song) then. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:06, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The song of Clout
Talk:Heinrich Friedrich Karl vom und zum Stein

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 15:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 14:47, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: I think the two entries are easy to be confused. Maybe a notice should be added? Aronlee90 (talk) 06:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this entry easy to be confused with [[Karl vom Stein zum Altenstein]]?
Talk:Balseros

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move (non-admin closure)  BegbertBiggs (talk) 00:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Balseros (rafters) →  – The page balseros redirects here. The only other article which uses the name is Balseros (film), which is about the rafters. There's no need for this; Balseros should naturally lead here while a disambiguation hat can link to the film. WP Ludicer (talk) 00:22, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 December 2020
Talk:Marquess Townshend

message: Have proof read the article. Changed "Viscountcy" to "Viscountancy". Spite & Malice 15:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well don't, because "Viscountancy" isn't a word. Proteus (Talk) 16:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: According to Burke's Peerage the Arms should be - Quarterly: 1st & 4th, Azure, a Chevron Ermine, between three Escallops Argent (Townshend); 2nd & 3rd, quarterly Gules and Or, in the first quarter a Mullet Argent, in the centre a Crescent Sable (de Vere)82.45.117.166 (talk) 13:06, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arms