Talk:Quebec French phonology

message: What I'd appreciate a lot is if two speakers, one Quebecois and the other French, read and recorded a sample text for comparison.
______________
It would be helpful if the article weren't so jargonized.  I find it very hard to glean useful information here.  It seems to be written for professional linguists.  
Nine999999999s 20:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recordings needed

message: Even if Parisian/Metropolitan French merges some of the French vowels, I don't agree when it is said that it merges  and . Apart from merging the declensions -ai/-ais (for the future and the conditional tenses, both pronounced ), we can still distinguish "ses" and "sait". Transcendency (talk) 23:07, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe some clarification is in order.  I don't see any part saying that there's a complete merger, just some instances where the open vowel becomes more tense.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 23:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone originally put a distinction between  and . I removed  because it's not a phoneme in either French or Canadian French, and replaced it with .  and  are often interchangeable (if not merged) in various Hexagonal French dialects, although some do retain the difference, most don't, but the distinction is still strong in Québec French. Now that I look back, it might have been intended to distinguish  and  instead (although  was never a phoneme in Hexagonal French). But to be honest, the whole first line is kind of ugly, and doesn't actually introduce the topic, so I'd say remove it (or incorporate it elsewhere), and create a better summary for the article. - Io Katai (talk) 05:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: {{IPA|/ɛ/}} and {{IPA|/e/}}

message: I understand the reason for the change, since such symbols as ʦ and ʣ are now not considered standard IPA, however I do not believe that changing them to  and  is a better alternative. For one, both  and  affricate before the front high vowels  and , meaning that they're entirely allophonic to the underlying  and . I think the distinction should be kept in order not to confuse  from , which is generally how the sequence  (and ) is handled at the exception of word-initially (e.g. tsar). Compare words such as trente-six, where the sequence  can further be reduced to  in some speakers. And then you'd also have to consider the assimilation of loan words, whereas most speakers will completely omit final plurals in English words, some others (usually closer to the Ontarian border) won't hesitate to pronounce final stop-fricative sequences (e.g. chats )  - Io Katai (talk) 03:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense.  User:Jasy jatere has claimed here that it is only slight affrication and  and  may be a better representation.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 03:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

text: To me this sounds more like , with  and  blended together (much like in some pronunciations of Swedish ). Peter238 (talk) 00:52, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  /d͡z t͡s/ vs. /dz ts/ 

message: Why Québécois pronounce  instead of  for the word fête ? Fête  —Preceding undated comment added 23:05, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what sort of answer you're looking for beyond the tautology that they pronounce it that way because they pronounce it that way. — Æµ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 01:39, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

text: Keep in mind that this is not a page for general discussion about Quebec French pronunciation. Questions are appropriate here only insofar as they directly concern the content and structure of the article. Is your question aimed at improving the article? If so, how? CapnPrep (talk) 14:46, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Fête comes from feste. The s is vocalised into i (very common sound shift in romance languages), but dissapeared alltogheter in some dialects such as Parisian French. Québec French, including around Québec (city), is more conservative and kept the vocalised sound. You'll find the exact same phonetic evolution for words such as tête (head), bête (beast), etc.  Correjon (talk) 22:45, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's not «standard», you'll hear it everywhere, including in formal contexts such as teaching or job interview. Some (or most?) newsreader in «news French» drop the diphthongs. Correjon (talk) 04:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  diphtongization 

message: I don't relate well to discussions of phonemes in isolation, and I expect there are others like me.24.69.174.26 (talk) 05:52, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good suggestion.  Choice examples often make these phonology articles clearer.  — Æµ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 15:51, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article could do with more examples. 

message: Kung-fu is often pronounced /kɔŋfu/. Fête  —Preceding undated comment added 12:19, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering about that.  Thanks. — Æµ§œš¹ [ãːɱ ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɪ̃ə̃nlɪ] 15:23, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  kung-fu 

message: I always heard /œ̃/ is realized as [œ̃˞]. Fête (talk) 22:46, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nasal vowels 

message: It has been brought to my attention that "-eur" is quite often realised [a˞] and possibly even [œ̞˞] (both r-coloured vowels) in Quebec French. I don't have any evidence to reference apart from anecdote and forvo.com in its example of the pronunciation of the word "dépanneur" [depanœ̞˞].http://www.forvo.com/word/d%C3%A9panneur/#fr What do you think? - Nath.king93 (talk) 09:58, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The realisation of the suffix "-eur" 

message: These lax vowels seem inclinded to centralise to [ɪ̈] and [ʊ̈] respectively. Again I have nothing more than anecdote and forvo.comhttp://www.forvo.com/word/ostie_de_c%C3%A2lisse/#frhttp://www.forvo.com/word/tu_me_manques/ as references.
I still think they're in complementary distribution but sometimes they seem more centralised — Nath.king93 (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That may be so, but we can't include this information in the article without a reliable source to back it up. Peter238 (talk) 23:01, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lax vowels /ɪ/ and /ʏ/ 

message: The diphthong section lists a lot of diphthongized realizations of long vowels, and could use some reorganization. Here I'll see if making a table will help. The precise placement of some of the diphthongs should probably be adjusted, but this is only a preliminary attempt at classification. I've used the vowel height of the corresponding vowels in the French of France for all but the nasalized vowels.
         	front, central	front, central	back
         	unrounded     	rounded       	back
close    	[ɪi̯]         	[ʏy̯]         	[ʊu̯]
close-mid	—[ẽɪ̯̃]       	[øʏ̯]—        	[oʊ̯][ɒ̃ʊ̯̃]
open-mid 	[aɪ̯]         	[aœ̯]         	[ɑɔ̯]
open     	—[ãʊ̯̃]       	              	—[ɑʊ̯]
One thing that seems to be missing is the nasalized rounded mid front vowel, as in un. It's hard to hear in the sample recording whether this is diphthongized, but I presume it is, like the other nasalized vowels, if it isn't merged with the nasalized unrounded mid front vowel, as it is in the French of France. — Eru·tuon 00:04, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: About time I replied too. I'm the one who provided the sample recording. I do not pronounce [œ̃] with a diphthong, I rhotacize it to [œ̃˞] as is transcribed. Prior research usually transcribed a diphthongized variant as [œ̃ỹ] (as in prior revisions of this article), but I think that nowadays (don't quote me on this) most Quebecers speaking informally rhotacize the vowel as I do. 74.58.15.135 (talk) 02:15, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

text: Do you by any chance know the source on which the Diphthongization section is based? Because Reinke (2005) uses a somewhat different notation to what we have here (see e.g. page 21, on which e.g.  is described as having diphthongal variants , rather than ). Peter238 (talk) 22:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:   Hmm, about time I responded. I don't know where the diphthong variants listed in the article came from. I suspect a lot of it is original research, because I've noticed so many changes to the IPA in that section in the past year. — Eru·tuon 00:39, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization of diphthong section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Quebec French phonology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140715222102/http://www.icphs2011.hk/resources/OnlineProceedings/RegularSession/Carignan/Carignan.pdf to http://www.icphs2011.hk/resources/OnlineProceedings/RegularSession/Carignan/Carignan.pdf
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150101035329/http://137.122.133.199/~Jeff/CAA_rhotic_vowels_2.pdf to http://137.122.133.199/~Jeff/CAA_rhotic_vowels_2.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This can be written better as "/ə/ does not exist in Canadian French and merged to /œ/, however, when /œʁ/ are together and /œ/ is a strong vowel in that position, the combination is realised as [ɑœ̯ʁ]." Erkinalp9035 (talk) 19:02, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: According to the article, Quebec French retains a distinction between /ɛ̃/ and /œ̃/ which are supposed to have merged in Parisian French. As you must know, I was taught Standard European French (neither Meridional not Canadian) at school and these two phonemes were kept thoroughly distinct. My teacher did not even mention the distinction being lost, and she never ever said in for un. While this merger is certainly widespread, it may be substandard rather than standerd Parisian French. Steinbach (talk) 09:18, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of /ɛ̃/ and /œ̃/ in French? 

message: This article is too technical and incomplete. As a rule of thumb, the basics should come before the details. For non-experts and non-Quebecers to read comfortably, a list that maps letters to sounds is neccessary. I am not capable enough to make a complete one though. A better strategy is that some other editors look for books written for non-linguists and then sort of copy some such table from one of them.--110.174.132.162 (talk) 07:35, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crucial information of sounds of letters is missing. 

message: How would you pronounce atteindre and atteint(e) in Quebec French?
Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.198.59.244 (talk) 17:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "atteindre" would be pronounced something like [a.tẽɪ̯̃dʁə̆]. Here's an audio file of a Canadian French speaker saying it: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LL-Q150_(fra)-DenisdeShawi-atteindre.wav?uselang=fr. And for "atteint" it would be something like [a.tẽɪ̯̃]. (Audio file for atteint https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/File:LL-Q150_(fra)-DenisdeShawi-atteint.wav) 2601:402:4480:4AA0:FDCC:82D1:6EDC:412 (talk) 00:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question