lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Filibuster

message: According to https://www.etymonline.com/word/filibuster the word comes from Dutch vrijbueter (now vrijbuiter) "freebooter".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.132.202.155 (talk) 10:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: Mark Page here: I believe there is a typo (years vs days). Under the United Kingdom heading, at the end of the paragraph beginning with 'In January 2011' the text reads '8 years' and should read '8 days' as the Filibuster debate had reached it's 8th day according to the article.
Hope this is correct.
Thank you,
Mark Page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.184.203.6  (talk) 16:57, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: TJRC (talk) 16:47, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo Correction 

message: By the definition of the filibuster it doesn't seem to even qualify as such. Postponing the vote within permitted, but limited, amount of time is not a debate. Filibuster is specific to the debate. If you'd qualify any and every example of postponing the vote as a "filibuster" you'd have examples flooded with just that throughout the history of the democracies, as it's a common practice. SkywalkerPL (talk) 15:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example from Poland 

message: Is it worth adding a section on the ox walk of the Japanese Diet?
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2020/01/31/commentary/japan-commentary/ox-walking-heckling-strange-diet-practices/
--Patbahn (talk) 21:35, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese ox walk Walk 

message: A transcript is here https://www.ola.org/en/legislative-business/house-documents/parliament-35/session-1/1991-05-06/hansard#PARA385
24.141.211.239 (talk) 13:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Should mention that there is an existing link to the transcript in the sources http://hansardindex.ontla.on.ca/hansardeissue/35-1/l028.htm, however it doesn't provide paragraph IDs to allow direct linking to the Zebra Mussels Act, and it's using the HTTP protocol, rather than HTTPS, so the existing link may cause issues with some browsers and security settings. 2001:1970:4D1E:6B00:D9EE:66FD:6E0A:5649 (talk) 00:56, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re. Ontario Canada filibuster naming all lakes, rivers, etc.
Talk:Hinge

message: Hello, I made serval changes including adding sections and revising previously written material. I added sections about the history, materials hinges are made of, every day use, and buying. I cited everything I borrowed and I tried to add an image/chart, but I couldn't unless it was my own work. Larisamcguire (talk) 03:51, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes I made 

message: This article doesn't mention pintle or gudgeon, the two parts of the the oldest and most common type of hinge.  I'm not qualified to write it, but it is needed. UniEngineer (talk) 22:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pintle and gudgeon 

message: — Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture
Talk:Dragon King

message: I posted about the dragon worlds king, and patriarcs. Maybe thats what you ment===  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.177.132.224 (talk) 01:32, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: In the bottum post thingy magig.....

message: I tried to find their personal names, but they all seem to only have royal titles. They're probably like the Jade Emperor, whose name, if even existing, is very very obscure, and worshippers always call them, out of convention and/or respect, their titles. --Menchi 13:59 29 Jun 2003 (UTC)
: Meng Zhang (孟章) is the human name Taoism assingns to the Azure Dragon according to the Four Auspicious Beasts (Four Symbols) article, but I've never seen this info myself.
:Ao Guang is given as the name of the Azure Dragon King of the Eastern Sea, which I vaguely recall from  Fengshen Yanyi.
:In Journey to the West they are named Aoguang (East) Aoguang (S), Aoguang  (N), Aorun (W).
:Or in Wade-Giles repreesentation, Ao-kuang (E) Aoqin (S), Aoshun (N), Ao-jun (W). --Kiyoweap (talk) 05:12, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal names 

message: --203.213.58.32 07:32, 18 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this doing in the main article? 

message: My name is jagrat. I am 15 years old are live in india state u.p. distt unnao tehsil Purwa  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JAGRAT (talk • contribs) 07:21, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jagrat Kumar (Purwa) 

message: Is Sea dragons Real? In japan There is somebody.. Aka rujin he is the Sea Dragon King Of Snakes And Dragons as you can tell by his looks. Snakes were consdired snakes death❤️‍🔥
He is the 8th Sea king of dragons and Snakes
Thats all for today! 2600:387:C:6C17:0:0:0:7 (talk) 20:56, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sea dragon king 

message: Tom, K. S. (1989), p. 55 which is cited only talks about the five regions (4 directions and center), nothing about the seas: "An azure or blue dragon symbolized the east and was identified with spring. Red or yellow dragons represented the south and summer. A white dragon was associated with the west and autumn, while a black dragon stood for the north and winter. "
Since source doesn't say so, equating the dragon of the east in this schema with the dragon of the east sea, or to Ao Guang from the novel constitutes WP:SYNTH. Please stick to the source.--Kiyoweap (talk) 21:49, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Five Regions dragons separate from Four Seas dragons
Talk:Dr. Martens

message: The description was changed some time ago from "looting" to "recovering valuables", whereas the german version of this page has a quote from Klaus Märtens.„Der Krieg ging zu Ende und jeder stürmte nach draußen und begann zu plündern. Doch während die meisten Leute nach Wertgegenständen wie Schmuck und Pelzen suchten, suchte ich mir einen Leisten, etwas Leder, Nadeln und Nähfäden und machte mir daraus ein Paar Schuhe mit den dicken luftgepolsterten Sohlen, die ich mir ausgedacht hatte.“ Translated:
"The war ended and everyone rushed outside and started looting. But while most people were looking for valuables like jewelry and furs, I found a last, some leather, needles and sewing thread and made myself a pair of shoes with the thick air-cushioned soles I'd come up with."
From this quote, Märtens himself refers to his actions as looting, for the supplies he needed to make clothes. Note the use of the verb "plündern" rather than "zurückgewonnen" or "wiedergunden".  Charlesv42 (talk) 09:55, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Märtens himself refers to his actions as , which the other editor translated as "liberated" or whathaveyou. If we're going to be persnickety about it, what's wrong with the word "plunder"? — LlywelynII 12:49, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recovering vs Looting 

message: I get leaving the page at Dr. Martens if they haven't bothered to correct their paperwork yet and we're focusing the article on the company itself but the   name of this footwear is "Doc Martens", it's not close, and we should use it consistently in the article to discuss the footwear sold by Dr. Martens PLC. The current article reads like it's discussing an herbal remedy or niche slightly unhinged soap. — LlywelynII 12:55, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Any reason this article uses the wrong name throughout?
Talk:Creeping featurism

message: ----
Why can't this just be called Feature Creep? I think the term is used far more often than "creeping featurism."
-- thealsir
----
I don't think this is a spoonerism.  A spoonerism is where you switch the beginnings of two words.  From the wikipedia page on same, "The lord is a shoving leopard" -- you take "loving shepherd" and make it "shoving leopard" by swapping the initial sounds.  "Creeping featurism" isn't swapped from anything -- it merely indicates that the features are creeping in.  The initial form isn't "feeping creaturism" or anything. [so changed] Delirium 15:57 29 Jun 2003 (UTC)
:I am not a native english, but i do not see how this "The term is often spoonerized as feeping creaturism" makes the term creeping featurism more clear. :Leuk he 14:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Creeping featurism

message: Article is a cand. for deletion, and I left a long screed on the talk page as to why I support this deletion.  It's a neologism, and the practice it refers to isn't even conceptually a feature, and I don't see the point of including a reference in this article to every coding practice that differentiates a 10 million line program from a 100 line program.  Some systems are large because they solve complex problems or integrate with a wide diversity of other systems.  Not every large program is automatically an example of creep.  If we convey that sense, we debase what this concept usefully invokes.  MaxEnt 17:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  link to [[prefixitis]] removed 

message: Is it worth mentioning that there is a Dilbert character called "The Feature Creep"? He's a rather disheveled man who gets into projects and blatently adds useless features for the sake of it. -- VederJuda 15:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dilbert Character

message: This whole section looks like original research, as there's little to no evidence that these quotes have ever been applied to feeping creaturism outside of this article. Can we agree to delete them, or at least delete anything without a published, reliable reference to that exact quote being used in respect to software creation? -- nae'blis 17:56, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first two quotes (Bell and Hoare) are relevant. The rest are more philosophical and probably could be deleted. --Lost Goblin 11:14, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  related quotes 

message: Any reason why this shouldn't be renamed to "Feature Creep"? it's by far the more accepted term. Artw 21:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to "Feature Creep"?
Talk:Meizhou Island

message: The reason why only 9 of the 11 village names are shown is not due to selective importance, but Google just doesn't show any more. I went through the 20 web pages that answered ""湄洲鎮" 村" ("Meizhou Township" village), and none have a comprehensive list, at most 2 at a time. They're trial records, company and government organization's address lists. --Menchi 17:20 29 Jun 2003 (UTC)
:Would the gov website not have the information. --40fifw0 (talk) 15:02, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete village list 

message: Meizhou Bay needs article!--40fifw0 (talk) 15:05, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Meizhou Bay
Talk:An Open Letter to Hobbyists

message: History records this as a primary source documenting the creation of a class of computer serfs, working on the property owned personally by Mr. Gates indirectly through the Microsoft corporation. The lack of knowledge barrier created by excluding publication of the computer machine code, against the First Amendment---implying that any law cited in support of such censorship is unconstitutional---is an assault on the free enterprise system and capitalism. The coincidence of the bicentennial is circumstantial evidence of this attack, as is the conflict with the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union knew that by allowing Mr. Gates to proceed, they were shutting down rival efforts to improve upon the knowledge contained in the machine code for Altair BASIC. This demand to create a private reserve of curiosity, interest in modification and improvement, and so on is deadly poison for the spirit and health of the free enterprise system. This anti-knowledge approach has turned Microsoft into the killer plant from the little shop of horrors. 70.171.155.43 (talk) 06:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Bruv, where can I get the killer plants that you're smoking? 171.61.253.49 (talk) 05:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary source
Talk:Larousse Gastronomique

message: Yes, I know what I wrote in the comments box for my Edit had an error. I wrote: "Ne plus altra was misspelt, and the phrase is too obscure". The altra was a typo, it's "ne plus ultra" and means "the very best of".
Adrian Pingstone 19:27 29 Jun 2003 (UTC)
: Strictly speaking, ne plus ultra means "not more beyond" or "nothing more beyond". Jhobson1 (talk) 12:16, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This book is shown and read in Red Dragon (film) and Julie & Julia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.251.192.145 (talk) 09:19, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia
Talk:Springfield (The Simpsons)

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Learn to Fart state. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Hog Farm (talk) 19:42, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Learn to Fart state" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: What about the Enriched Learning Center for Gifted Children that Bart goes to in one of the first episodes?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.168.238.221 (talk) 06:50, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enriched Learning Center for Gifted Children 

message: We can't remove this section. Reliable citations need to be found and added so it can be kept. IPs are people too 🇺🇸🦅 05:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources are needed for the (currently removed) section "Bars and Restaurants"
Talk:Bea (Dennis the Menace)

message: I thought Beas full name was Beaginnings, not beatrice?
:Dennis says it's Beatrice in the issue which first revealed her name (issue 2933, dated 3 October 1998): "Her name is Bea- short for Beatrice!" I think 'Beaginnings' was just a play on 'Beginnings' for the comic strip. BillyH 02:12, 22 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Business philosophies and popular management theories

message: This article seems to take a very dim view of its topic.  It should be more neutral.  Powers 14:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Most management approaches served a legitimate purpose given the context of their time. Many are still relevant today, but applying them sensibly requires knowing the models' strengths and weaknesses. ProvenModels allows you to sort and filter through this vast field of past management models in a comprehensive way. Alberta74 (talk • contribs) 08:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparing management approaches 

message: I find this article to very skewed and slanted. I read these "definitions" and expect them to be more factual, more objective. I definitely take exception with this article as being very subjective.
Milo cobra (talk) 21:14, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV agreed
Talk:Price discrimination

message: After reading the entirety of this article, I can't help but feel like a large piece of the complete picture is missing. Specifically, objections and criticism.
The current content is great quality imo - I've never encountered a marketing/economics article that read so clearly and easily, so kudos to those involved. 
That being said, it also read a bit like a chapter from the Handbook for Human Exploitation, or at least a bit anti-consumer, and I was surprised to see no mention of this. I can't tell if the article is neutral, or a zealous endorsement lacking the expected criticism. I don't want to fabricate controversy / original research / moral considerations, but curious what others say 2607:FEA8:FEF0:80F7:99BA:B074:76A6:1F94 (talk) 19:29, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms
Talk:Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure

message: Hello, all,
Having just watched both movies last night (with the subtitles playing) in a Bill and Ted marathon, I note that this article does not quite get Ted's name right. The subtitles make it clear that he considers his christened name to be Ted, and his nickname to be Theodore. To be precise, the subtitle captions read Ted "Theodore"  Logan. The joke is so subtle prior editiors may have missed it.
Georgejdorner (talk) 15:58, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A minor emendation is needed 
Talk:Mauno Koivisto

message: I think the article would be pretty well off on its way to a good article if the post-presidency section would be expanded and the trest double-checked & copy-edited. Might do that in a while when I gather myself. Cheers Manelolo (talk) 20:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finishing up 

message: The resource "Two Terms I" / "Kaksi kautta I" by Koivisto himself is listed as three different references. Surely these refer to the same resource? JIP | Talk 02:33, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Terms I / Kaksi kautta I
Talk:Battle of Bunker Hill

message: Was there a previous consensus that the infobox result should be limited to just "See Aftermath" at all? It seems pretty obvious what the result was - a Pyrrhic British victory. It's not as if the result is in question - the British took the ground and drove the colonial forces from the Peninsular, but suffered irreplaceable casualties that prevented them from following-up on their victory. (TomRidley (talk) 22:42, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Description of the result in the infobox as "See Aftermath" defers to the broad community consensus not to use such terms as "Pyrrhic" in the infobox per WP:MILMOS, noting that MILMOS explicitly defers to the template documentation. Apologies that I did not see this question earlier. Regards, Cinderella157 (talk) 01:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  "see aftermath" in this case makes sense. It was clearly a British victory, as they took the hill, and the numbers of dead weren't that different really, in that the Brits lost about 240 killed, but the US lost 120 or so. That's the sort of number you might expect from taking a fortified position, so its nothing too amazing. However British General Sir Henry clinton refers to it as a Pyrhic victory, so it appears that's how it was percieved. Deathlibrarian (talk) 00:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is supposed to be factual, so Why hasn't it been changed to a "British Victory" in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23EE:1580:369E:DA1E:C57A:DA10:B2D9 (talk) 00:03, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle result
Talk:Kara-Khanid Khanate

message: Last talking language of Kara-Khanid's is persian and someones steal history here and this page is protected. That's weird. Their main language was Middle-Turkic and arabic not persian. Somone is trying to convert this page to tottaly Persian why there is persion on the top like they talking persian? this page should be edit definitely Ltequila (talk)ltequila~~  —Preceding undated comment added 21:03, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: *cough*battleground comments*cough* --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

text: Nonsense, the source in the article state that they also spoke Persian. And the article has been protected so the likes of you can't disrupt it, as you have done previously in other places . --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:03, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: I have no idea why someone would add list of researchers' names to the articles. If important, their name would appear in the sources. If not, then their names shouldn't appear, and it would be original research to suggest that they are important. Other articles on empires simply don't list the researchers' names in separate section, and the same is true for any other Wikipedia articles (e.g. a scientific topic, a historical event, a place, etc.). Unless it is an article specifically about researchers on the Kara-Khanids, then their names should not be listed in article. You can add the names if they said certain things that you are quoting in a particular sentences, e.g. "According to xyz, the Kara-Khanids originated from ..." or "Xyz disputed the idea that the Kara-Khanids originated from ...", or if a particular researcher is very important, for example, making some important discoveries (in which case the person may even merit a separate paragraph on the discussion of their discoveries), otherwise the names shouldn't be given as separate entries in their own different section in article.  Hzh (talk) 08:36, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted the edit as user:Khorazmiy also removed a Cambridge University Press source in the process. Also, just wondering; why should we use Soviet and Russian Federation scholarship, when there are far better sources out there in English? (the world's lingua franca, and the language of this Wikipedia). - LouisAragon (talk) 23:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Researchers 

message: @Beshogur I don’t know how to source the the image from Vahaduo, like Vahaduo doesn’t post the dna distancing, you have to manually do it and screenshot or save the result. HazaraHistorian (talk) 21:08, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @HazaraHistorian Are you using Vahaduo to do original research? —C.Fred (talk) 23:11, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetics 

message: , can you explain what you're doing? You've been reverted several times and you have made two reverts, and you've provided zero explanation throughout, despite some clear problems with your changes. Per WP:BRD, please explain your edits on the talk page instead of edit-warring. R Prazeres (talk) 09:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit-warring in infobox
Talk:History of the British penny (1837-1901)

message: I was cleaning out some old storage bins belonging to a deceased relative and came across several old coins. The oldest is an 1899 one penny with Queen Victoria's bust on one side in fine condition.
There are 2 Half Crowns 1937 and 1954 in superior condition. The last coin is a two shilling 1953 in superior condition.
My questions are two fold, one the value and secondly the meaning of the latin inscriptions?
--Fullflow 05:35, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1899 one penny (British) 

message: I have recently bought by post the above mentioned pennies, I was surprised to see how small they were compared to other Victoria pennies, they measure 22mm in diameter. The head is a young Victoria facing left with the inscription VICTORIA DEI GRATIA with the dates 1840 & 1853 respectively. The reverse side is Britania facing right and the inscription BRITANNIAR: REG: FID: DEF
I have not found any reference to the diminutive size, are they genuine?
Can anyone help shed light on the matter?...many thanks...82.153.59.141 (talk) 10:27, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1840 & 1853 Victoria One Penny Coins??
Talk:RC6

message: Information on the AES algorithm (Rijndael) is available, including test values, intellectual property (IP) statements, and specifications.Please note that these pages are included for historical reference only. As these pages refer to a development effort, they may contain errors. Refer to FIPS 197 for the actual specification of AES. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.115.120.236 (talk • contribs) 11:42, 30 June 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: Is there any? FT2 (Talk | email) 14:35, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick Google turns up a couple of papers from a few years back on breaking various simplified versions of RC6, nothing serious. I couldn't see much published since Rijndael was selected as AES... presumably the motivation to study the cipher was reduced at that point. — Matt Crypto 21:14, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cryptoanalysis?