lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:KRKK

message: Someone needs to verify the 'First on air' date (info box) because '1983' is not correct.  I was a disc-jockey at KRKK 1360 AM in 1979, 80 and 81, and listened to it from 1975, so it's at least that old.  Unfortunately, I do not know the correct date.  The station was quite old when I was there.  The date listed is probably the date the ownership changed to the current owner(s), but it was on the air long before 1983.  If I had to guess, KRKK was probably first on the air in the late '60s to very early '70s at the latest.--Equilibrious (talk) 18:01, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, 1983 is the date the ownership changed. I will give KRKK a call soon and see if they know the exact date. Thanks for pointing it out! Question: was KRKK always oldies? Milonica (talk) 22:29, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, KRKK used to be a Top 40 format most of the years I was aware of it.  It had your typical talk-heavy morning drive shift and then a typical Top 40 rotation throughout the rest of the day.  At night the station morphed into an almost AOR / request format with the rotation intersperced.  Weekends it broadcast a lot of syndicated content like American Top 40 (day) and Inner-View (night), King Biscuit Flower Hour (Sundays).  Sundays also had some local talkshow content as well.  --Equilibrious (talk) 18:41, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

text: If we could find sufficient sources for that information I would like to add some of it to the article. I had no idea there was so much history behind those three stations. Milonica (talk) 22:10, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what constitutes a 'source', but I can say this.  While I was there the DJ on duty had to not only run the live broadcast (board) at KRKK, but also fix any malfunctions with the automation over at KQSW (next door).  So, during any given shift (particularly a night shift) the DJ was actually running two stations at the same time with no other assistance (engineer or anyone else). --Equilibrious (talk) 19:11, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

text: I added some information to the article based on what you told me. I also got the precise air date that KRKK signed on via calling the station. The lady didn't know the KQSW air date but is going to call me back when she finds out. Hopefully I can get KSIT at the same time. I am going to add it to my front page (User:Milonica) a new project that I am going to start to get air dates from stations via calling their offices. I will also collect them on a website so I can cite them. Milonica (talk) 22:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First on air
Wikipedia talk:Arguments to avoid in feature discussions

message: By longstanding agreement, objections on an FAC must be theoretically actionable. So, for instance, "I don't like this subject" would be an argument to avoid, because that isn't relevant to the quality, and there is no possible way to fix that. -Amarkov moo! 04:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  There ''are'' some arguments that should be avoided 

message: The text Marskell contests actually says: 
:Our copyediting rules are guidelines, which are recommendations; they should be followed (as guidelines ought to be), but it is better to have a clear, well-written, neutral, accurate article with copyediting problems than a badly written and erroneous polemic with perfect dashes and italicization. Copyediting the well-written and accurate article would improve it further; but a review that has had only style concerns addressed is incomplete. 
This is not a dichotomy. It says that policy concerns and readability are more important than most copyediting details, when we must choose which to do, but getting both right is better. That's a threefold division, fourfold if we include the article unsatisfactory on either count. (If this masks a disagreement on whether bias and hyphens  are equal flaws, he should make that case.)    Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:55, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: dichotomy

message: On first reading it seems to me that one of the key points that the essay seeks to make is that "it is better to have a clear, well-written, neutral, accurate article with copyediting problems than a badly written and erroneous polemic with perfect dashes and italicization." To which my question would be: if an article is to "exemplify our very best work", why can't we require both? J.Winklethorpe talk 19:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not both?
Talk:Misunderstood (Bon Jovi song)

message: Seems like there should be links to the videos. I looked all over and can NOT find the uncut version of the video (with the extended ending described). If anyone can find it on YouTube or whatever, please give it an external link? 70.162.82.140 (talk) 17:01, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links? 

message: Her first step in testing its truthfulness would be to look up and see whether there's a hole in the ceiling of the room! AnonMoos (talk) 13:48, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with story

message: This isn't hard rock please change to pop rock. AdamBendelow (talk) 15:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: We go by cited sources, not personal opinions.  - FlightTime (open channel) 15:22, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hard Rock? I don't think so. 

message: https://www.discogs.com/ru/Bon-Jovi-Misunderstood/release/4064072 AdamBendelow (talk) 20:30, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  My source for Pop Rock
Talk:KZOY

message: Is there any good reason why Sunny Radio needs to have a separate article from KZOY itself? (Yes, it was on KZOI for a while as well, but the Sunny Radio article predates that — but KZOY, the station, had an article before Sunny Radio's was created. And these two stations are by no means the only stations to have been branded "Sunny"…) WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 19:27, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Sunny Radio]] into [[KZOY]]
Talk:KSTN (AM)

message: The station filed the following statement with the FCC:
:KSTN RESUMED OPERATIONS WITH ITS LICENSED FACILITIES AT NOON ON FRIDAY, JANUARY 21, 2011, BROADCASTING MUSIC PROGRAMMING, STATION IDENTIFICATIONS AND STATION PROMOTIONS.
It had to resume programming by February, 2011, or its license would automatically expire under the terms of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.  121a0012 (talk) 07:42, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer silent 

message: This is still a valid FCC license, albeit silent.  The sourced story in fact suggests the station might come back later "as something else".   Based on what they did in January 2011, they didn't abandon the license.  Stating the station went silent "for the last time" is premature.   Wikipedia is not a cystal ball.108.82.248.203 (talk) 07:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Past Tense
Talk:NDSU Magazine

message: I hope I was allowed to add that stub thing above (was this the correct place to comment?) --NDState 05:00, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course you're allowed to add the WPND banner and assess it as stub class. Any WPND member can add the banner and assess the article so don't hesitate. I think your question was a little better suited for the main talk page instead of the "comments" section so I moved it here...hope you don't mind. --MatthewUND(talk) 05:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats fine, this was actually where I wanted it.  --NDState 22:22, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub
Talk:Sonny Umpad

message: As a former student of Sonny Umpad I can certify that the information on this page is true to the best of my knowledge. The bibliography/filmography section contains third party source material which can verify most of the information given on this page. As a new contributor to Wikipedia I am not clear on how satisfy the notibility, certifiability requirements. Some help would be appreciated.(Skmagness 05:04, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As a former student of Sonny's I too will attest to this article's authenticity.  Sonny was an original, authentic, creative genius!  129.33.119.12 (talk) 18:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Authenticity 

message: replaced non working external links with working links to appropriate sites. Added an updateconcern progress of Sonny Umpad's work after his death.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Skmagness (talk • contribs) 03:44, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent update
Talk:KTKT

message: During the 1950s, KTKT was Tucson's only rock and roll radio station. It was first found at 1490 AM. Originally owned and opperated by Thomas J Wallace Sr. Mr Wallace came to Tucson from Chicage where he was Uncle Walter in the 1940's radio show 'Uncle Walter's Dog House". 
By 1956 the Wallace family had moved KTKT to 99.5 FM and called it the "Color Channel". After hiring on air talent Frankie Kalil, KTKT becamne number one in Tucson.  
Their bumber sticker was notorious, 'Don't honk, listening to KTKT Color Channel 99'
KTKT In the 1960s, and the early 70s,played a Top 40 format and was by far the number one radio station in Tucson and southern Arizona.  Today there is a KTKT Tribute site devoted to the original KTKT "color channel 99" [color TV was the rage in the early 1960s].
You can learn more at [165inchtranscriptions.com/ktkt]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.157.75.161 (talk) 19:39, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''HISTORY'''
Talk:Neighbours (Rolling Stones song)

message: Hello,  I changed the spelling in the lyric quotes to British spelling to be consistent with the spelling in the song title!  I have seen both spellings reproduced on the web.  Clearly the band was using British spelling when they named the song and they are an English band.  The original album came with no liner notes.  CaperBill (talk) 18:56, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  spelling
Talk:Nemesis (Shriekback)

message: The Shriekback article indicates that the song charted in the UK.  No references were given in article so I'm marking this stub as requiring references. -- Whpq (talk) 14:48, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Charting is notable only if there is "enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article" per WP:MUSIC#Songs. Please expand this article (add an infobox, who wrote it, when was it released)?  Without expansion, an AfD is warranted.  --Wolfer68 (talk) 19:21, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contesting deletion
Talk:Mercury (Bova novel)

message: I have just finished reading the book Mercury by Ben Bova, and thought that I would take the time to summarize it on Wikipedia for the benefit of others. Every aspect of my summary is accurate, and I wish that it be preserved as a permanent article.
Fwigglemuck 05:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Fwigglemuck. I removed the "speedy delete" tag, but there is still a possibility that it could be deleted. It would be worth reviewing Wikipedia:Notability (books), which has some specifics about what would be needed for an article about a book to remain permanently. Cheers, --Paul Erik 05:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hello Fwigglemuck, my apologies for the speedy tag. I realized that it was placed there in error. The article appeared at first to be a candidate for db-bio. Postoak 05:30, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

message: In the "Reception" section: "[...] a guaranteed crown-pleaser." There appears to be a typo (crowd). I don't have access to the source, so I can't tell whether it happened in the original or when quoting. 201.231.173.108 (talk) 01:46, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed that; the typo seems to have occurred while transcribing, not in the original. Thanks for bringing it to attention. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "crown" quote
Talk:No, Not Now

message: There needs to be a little more information here to justify this song having an article apart from the album. PurpleChez (talk) 15:13, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability?
Talk:Not Going Away

message: Any info as to whether a video for the song was actually ever released? It's said "the final edit has yet to be released" for about half a year now.
--Rock Soldier (talk) 04:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video? 

message: there is no source for alternative metal. have removed it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.161.4.222 (talk) 10:50, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  genre
Talk:Manchu Wok

message: Because I'm now in charge of taking care of all of the Cafe de Coral related articles, this one falls under that too, so I will be tending to this and expanding this.
However, there are NO Manchu Wok locations in my area, so I would appreciate a photo of one of the restaurants as well as a decent photo of the food. Thanks.
Jon914 05:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/NHL information issues

message: Perhaps it should be named "Data Quality Issues with NHL and NRHP Information"?  The purpose is to record discrepancies and to permit researchers / editors to share facts.  I mean for the article itself to refrain from judgments and be entirely factual, documented, and to adhere to the "No Original Research" credo.  As I have been working on the List of National Historic Landmarks in New York, I have come across data discrepancies that seem to need to be described (in the article) and discussed (perhaps here in this talk page). doncram 05:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name and Purpose for the Article
Category talk:Café de Coral

message: This is just a start to this category. About another 10 chains will hop on board once I get their pages all set up and organized. Jon914 05:40, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting 
Talk:Bad (economics)

message: : I've spoken to an economics professor who says this could be related to the concept of negative externalities, although I'm not sure if the term "bad" is ever used in economics in that sense. We might consider merging it, if there aren't any notable sources for the idea of an "economic bad".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.106.4.120 (talk) 19:50, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this is just negative externalities that's being discussed here. Unless there can be found more sources to prove that this is a true economic concept it should be removed. Crimsonedge34 (talk) 17:26, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this a clever article, or real?

message: "a bad is an object whose consumption or presence lowers the utility of the consumer." For whom`? The seller? The producer? The consumer? I dont understand. Lowers the utility-potential? Lowers the potential of utilitization that a given consumer might make after the buying and/or consumption of given object/bad? Or does it lower the utility of the consumer. I am puzzled.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.203.57.113 (talk) 21:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems likely that this page is a spoof. Goods are goods, whether or not they have a negative impact. I think this article should be deleted (or at best) added as a off-beat subscript to a page on goods. Arrivisto (talk) 18:17, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: About a sentence and its meaning.
Talk:Vapor–liquid separator

message: Please correct the grammar and usage of this section:
"In low gravity environments such as a space station, a common liquid separator will not function because gravity is not usable as a separation mechanism. In this case, centrifugal force needs to be utilized in a spin"
1.  Gravity is not a separation mechanism.  It should say "because gravity is not usable as a driving force for a separator."  
2.  Centrifugal force has no needs.   So we should not say that "centrifugal force needs this or that."   There could be other technologies as well, so the last sentence would begin better as, "In this case, gravity is used in a spin..."  Remember, KISS.
Ziaddel (talk) 17:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar and usage, introduction
Talk:Ross Detwiler

message: I was thinking about adding some information about Detwiler and the Potomac Nationals winning the Carolina League Championship for A+ minor league ball.  Any thoughts? Liberoarbitrio (talk) 20:24, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of MILB Championship 

message: I feel that including Detwiler's height was not necessary. Although he is tall, very few baseball players have their height mentioned. If it is important, it should probably be moved to another section. --Joey Gallo (talk) 14:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detwiler's Height
Talk:Ordinary Lives

message: Barry Gibb, in the below youtube video, outlines the inspiration for this song as reminiscence of the time he spent growing up in Redcliffe, Australia with his brothers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZUcxSSVPxlk  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.101.143.74 (talk) 15:39, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Inspiration for the Song
Talk:Lashkendar

message: To the best of my knowledge (and I am NOT an expert at all), the ownership of Abkhazia is disputed. (At least according to Abkhazia.) If there's been a change in that, please let me know, otherwise I'll change the tone of that sentence in a few days. Just posting here rather than being Bold since I imagine some people have strong feelings about it. --Bfigura (talk) 05:58, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't it written clearly enough about the status of Abkhazia? (de facto independent republic internationally recognised as part of Georgia). This is one of the accepted terms in Wikipedia and is used not only here but in a lot of other articles related to Abkhazia (starting with the intro of the Abkhazia article). Alæxis¿question? 07:32, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The status of Abkhazia has no relevance to the article as it stands, so I can see no good reason for including this statement or any variants on it in this article.  I'm sure that talk is right that "some people have strong feelings about it" but this article isn't the appropriate place to vent them (in fact neither is wikipedia period.) I've deleted it. -- Timberframe (talk) 14:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Status of Abkhazia
Talk:Outlaw Man

message: The radio did not play Outlaw Man much back in those long-ago days and as time passed the rare emanation of the thoroughly right-on tune decreased to the point that I have to rely upon my own copy of the song. Take a listen... most of the cool kids like the song and you may, too!!! Obbop (talk) 14:21, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groovy Song
Talk:Abdurrahman Vazirov

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 23:52, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Photograph (Weezer song)

message: "Razors" are small non-motorized scooters with no hand-brake.  So, unless the one Patrick Wilson is shown riding (in the music video) is a modified model or is otherwise souped-up, it is not a Razor scooter.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.178.242.225 (talk) 03:11, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scooter in Music Video 

message: Is it really Tyson Ritter or is it Brian Bell? Can we verify the juggling guy?112.202.10.218 (talk) 15:41, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tyson Ritter
Talk:Teakettle Junction, California

message: Name should be capitalized. "junction" should be "Junction".
Not sure how to rename pages or if a delete / recreate process will be needed.  James Lednik 06:20, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved it. Michaelbusch 06:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Surely there's a story. 150.243.14.39 (talk) 17:53, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name origin?

message: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teakettle Junction, California and Wikipedia:Consensus thru editing demonstrate a consensus to not merge this article.Djflem (talk) 19:57, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a consensus not to delete the article and a closure does not forbid further changes. Obvious merge target was not known during the AFD. This is a place of interest in Death Valley and should obviously be included in the Places of interest in the Death Valley area article so this was inappropriate. Per WP:NOPAGE there should not be a WP:REDUNDANT WP:DUPLICATE page, and the content is WP:ATD WP:PRESERVED there. Reywas92Talk 20:05, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: And the Wikipedia:Consensus thru editing demonstrated on this page in which that change was rejected? Djflem (talk) 20:08, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Per WP:SUMMARYSTYLE you should not just leave a {main} tag and nothing else. It's hard to summarize when four sentences is all the content in the first place. Passing GNG does not mandate a separate article, most everything in Places of interest in the Death Valley area passes GNG but guidelines support coverage there unless a split is warranted. Reywas92Talk 20:15, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Adjusted Places of interest in the Death Valley area and added see also here.Djflem (talk) 20:35, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No merge
Talk:Pink Cadillac (song)

message: Pink Cadillac bet Midler 1983 before bruce springtine 2A00:23C6:3A8C:5801:75C8:5BE7:DF70:76EB (talk) 21:29, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pink Cadillac bet Midler 1983
Talk:Qooxdoo

message: This description is a straight lift from the marketing literature :( Duck Monster 06:26, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Concerning editing and maintaining JavaScript-related articles...
=== Collaboration...===
If you are interested in collaborating on JavaScript articles or would like to see where you could help, stop by Wikipedia:WikiProject JavaScript and feel free to add your name to the participants list. Both editors and programmers are welcome.
 
=== Where to list JavaScript articles ===
We've found over 300 JavaScript-related articles so far. If you come across any others, please add them to that list. 
=== User scripts ===
The WikiProject is also taking on the organization of the Wikipedia community's user script support pages. If you are interested in helping to organize information on the user scripts (or are curious about what we are up to), let us know!
If you have need for a user script that does not 
yet exist, or you have a cool idea for a user script or gadget, you can post it at Wikipedia:User scripts/Requests. And if you are a JavaScript programmer, that's a great place to find tasks if you are bored.
=== How to report JavaScript articles in need of attention ===
If you come across a JavaScript article desperately in need of editor attention, and it's beyond your ability to handle, you can add it to our list of JavaScript-related articles that need attention.
=== Rating JavaScript articles ===
At the top of the talk page of most every JavaScript-related article is a WikiProject JavaScript template where you can record the quality class and importance of the article.  Doing so will help the community track the stage of completion and watch the highest priority articles more closely.
Thank you. The Transhumanist 01:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintenance and rating of JavaScript articles 

message: At the top of the talk page of most every JavaScript-related article is a WikiProject JavaScript template where you can record the quality class and importance of the article.  Doing so will help the community track the stage of completion and watch the highest priority articles more closely.
Thank you. The Transhumanist 01:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating JavaScript articles