lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WWE The Music, Volume 8

message: Please do not change the title of Hornswoggle's theme to "Hes Da Ma" the source as well as the CDs case clearly show the track is called "Hes Ma Da". Edgehead5150 (talk) 07:36, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hornswoggle's theme

message: We should have someone put up a citation needed marker by the listing of Jeff Hardy’s theme in the list until it is officially confirmed.Adg2k7 (talk) 00:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jeff Hardy not confirmed yet

message: I’ve seen multiple sources claim that the new WWE album will be titled Volume 8 and multiple sources that claim it will be called WWE The Music, Volume 9. We should get clarification on that so that we know if even the title of the page is right. This page is clearly in need of some cleanup, and soon.Adg2k7 (talk) 00:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vol. 8 or Vol. 9?

message: I'm guessing some of you might think this is pointless to have in the article, but shouldn't we donate the tracks that are covers? JediYoda1120 (talk) 03:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Covers

message: Who's Axel? 98.193.77.218 (talk) 18:45, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea. But I can most definetly say that he (or they?) is not Axl Rose (or as they put it "Axel Rose") as some dirtsheets are saying  -- Oakster  Talk  18:51, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the the tracklisting... 

message: ...but when I was importing my CD to my computer, it said it was by Rev Theory. This is a strange mistake, but if this has happened to others, is it worth mentioning in the article that some CDs were mislabeled (in that technological way)? Ladder4321 (talk) 07:03, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to my computer it was performed by Aiden, however, many computers label it (as well as all the other songs) performed by either WWE or who the song is used for. So, I do not think it should be mentioned. SAVIOR_SELF.777 03:55, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ashley's Theme is by Aiden....
Talk:Lily Allen and Friends

message: That Host section STINKS of point of view, sounds like an advert for Lily Allen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.243.220.22 (talk) 18:56, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Judging by what she said on the first episode, it was probably added by Allen herself (!) --  L. T. Dangerous  (Talk to me!)  01:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: The article below gives deatils of how poorly recieved it was by audience members. Perhaps it's worth a mention?
http://www.entertainmentwise.com/news/40485/fans-walk-out-of-lily-allens-sick-tv-show  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike45450 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems relevant, have added it in. SynergyBlades (talk) 21:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 

message: I see Chris Crocker is a part of the show, is this true? Do we have any proof?
:Video here. 71.139.8.83 (talk) 11:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crocker?
Talk:Quiet Spike

message: "...such as Concorde (c.f. Operation Bongo)."  It's not in http://www.m-w.com  --CousinJohn (talk) 14:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the heck does "c.f." mean? 
Talk:Indiana Jones (comics)

message: Do the Indiana Jones comics (at least one of either publishers) form a continuity?--Baruch ben Alexander - ☠☢☣ 23:51, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indiana Jones extended universe? 

message: The article's introduction ends with a reference to something that was expected to happen in 2008. That was 12 years ago.
Since I don't know enough about the franchise to be able to update the page, I have added the "Update" template to the page.
--Rob Kelk 14:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 

message: There was a Young Indiana Jones strip serialized weekly in the Young Telegraph section of the UK Daily Telegraph newspaper. Was it an adaptation of the comics or an original series..? ntnon (talk) 01:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newspaper Strip
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Quizimodo

message: There are some problems with how this RFC is formatted; could the certifiers go through and edit the page to better-comply with the prescribed format (i.e. filling in all of the sections at the top)? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 00:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Under which section, does one co-certify? GoodDay (talk) 02:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Users certifying the basis for this dispute". Sarcasticidealist (talk) 02:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting of RFC

message: Discussion should be conducted with a certain degree of dignity and respect. Sure, occasionally we'll drop a heated remark. I think most people could forgive or suffer that and I believe reasonable people would apologise for that. But it makes it very difficult to have a discussion when a user uses offensive remarks habitually. That's a different matter. I don't know what he's doing? Is he deliberately being offensive to try and force others out of the discussion? He has removed my notices from his talk page with contempt. He either does not realise he's behaving like a jerk, or he does know and doesn't care. Quizimodo, all we are  asking you to do is to be civil.--Gazzster (talk) 23:11, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civility 

message: You may wish to add signatures to your postings, Gazzter. I've added considerably more incidents to the request for comment. --soulscanner (talk) 06:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm glad someone else has recognised his attitude, subtle as it may be. Quizimodo has indicated to Sarcasticidealist that he does not wish any contact with me. As I indicated, if that means I can edit Dominion and participate in discussions without having to talk with him and suffer his immaturity, that's fine with me. My principal concern was that he was obstructing discussion at that article. Now he hasn't visited Dominion since I posted a Wikiquette alert. And we have since been able to have protection lifted. So I really have nothing more to pursue from this RFC. If he does continue his attitude I would have to rethink that. And I suggest we keep the RFC open until you have some sort of closure for your complaint.--Gazzster (talk) 07:01, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved History to Description 

message: I was asked to comment on this matter through a note on my talk page, but I don't think I can actually participate. Unfortunately, I do not feel that I am sufficiently aware of the different positions, or even the nature of the dispute itself. Apologies, and best of luck for a quick resolution. --Ckatzchatspy 05:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This RfC
Talk:List of English words of Indonesian origin

message: The term Indonesian (Bahasa Indonesia) only began to exist in 1928. Many of the words in the list have been used in English/other European languages long before that. They are certainly not of 'Indonesian origin'.Ø:G (talk) 21:16, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: This list is misleading

message: The word 'ketchup' appears to be from Malay, not from Indonesian. Neither the Wikipedia article on ketchup, nor the Wiktionary article, suggest that the word may be from Indonesian.
I'm therefore removing ketchup from the list, reversing the unexplained revert by User:Ibra Bintang from when I did this before.
Wootery (talk) 19:48, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia’s List of English words of Malay origin features many of the same words as this article because the languages are similar. Catsup/ketchup could also be on both lists, if credible citations supported it. Morganfitzp (talk) 15:04, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Ketchup' is not from Indonesian
Talk:List of programs broadcast by People's Television Network

message: To prevent this article from being deleted, please cite references before listing it here. Citing "base on memory" is no excuse. The program may have been broadcast in another network or have transferred after its initial airing or during the time we see the program on NBN. Anyone can say that they remember seeing a TV program on this station but a solid proof will justify its inclusion in this listing.
I will be adding citation marks to programs that requires reference. Please do not delete those markings (as some editors tend to do so and is consider an evidence of possible fake programs being added). If no reference has been added after a long duration from its initial mark, the titles may be considered as a hoax or tampering. TJ Reyes 23:05, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Required 
Talk:Xenophora

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:25, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Renee Williams

message: Strange. In the documentary she's shown weighed at 841.1 lb (381.5 kg) and is said to be 5 ft 6 in (1.68 m) tall, and the doctor calculates her BMI at 113 – yet with her weight and height it should be 136 [381.5 kg / (1.68 m)2 ≈ 136 kg/m2]. Note: unit-converted figures were used unrounded for calculation. --Anshelm '77 (talk) 19:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Giuseppe Fiorelli

message: These references were in the original article, and perhaps should only be here in Talk. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:23, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Older references in the article

message: I recommend placing a header for not meeting poor quality standards; all the citations are wrong, the body isn't really differentiated, the subtext on the picture is almost funny in its unprofessionalism, and the whole thing is generally poorly written.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.63.107.83 (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor quality
Talk:Floyd McKissick

message: This may be a better image than the one currently in the article; I leave it to someone else to judge. - Jmabel | Talk 17:41, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Wychnor Hall

message: This page is misnamed. The correct title of the home is Wychnor (or Wichnor) Park, not Hall.
MarmadukePercy (talk) 01:16, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How do you pronounce this place name? "Wick-ner hall" or "Witch-ner hall"? --saebou (talk) 12:42, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation
Talk:Flag Day (disambiguation)

message: I'm surprised that there isn't a full article on the computing meaning of the phrase (vs the mention here).  Seems worthwhile. Jordan Brown (talk) 01:29, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag Day (computing) 

message: What is this about?  "Suffrage" is voting, but it's spelled differently, and why honor an attempt to stamp it out?  It it's "suffering" that this is about, please spell it correctly, and better yet, describe what sort of suffering is meant.
--Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "sufferage" in Malta?
Talk:List of International Mathematical Olympiad participants

message: I completely agree with switching to the table format for Exceptionally young medallists but it is completely unsourced at this moment. Can you mention the source you are getting this info from? Solomon7968 15:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The DOBs of the listed participants comes from their Wikidata pages, and the date of their medal reception comes from the IMO website (the last day of a year's IMO). --bender235 (talk) 18:11, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I propose removing the entire section as it is original research by synthesis. The rest two section sourced directly from the IMO database is OK. Solomon7968 05:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: By that logic, the last section about IMO participants winning selected prizes needs to go, too. Or List of FIDE chess world number ones#Player statistics. Apart from that, I don't think WP:SYN means what you think it means. --bender235 (talk) 19:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exceptionally young medallists
Talk:Philip Glass Buys a Loaf of Bread

message: I put in where the play was first performed and when and when it was first published (information weirdly missing in the original article). Unfortunately, there are no citations in the original article (and I didn't add any... because I'm sort of a jerk I guess) and someone way more conscientious than myself should add them (and maybe do a slight re-write). Gingermint (talk) 23:17, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Needs Almost Everything 
Talk:The Worst Jobs in History

message: How is this notable? Enigma (talk) 01:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a series on TV.  It's as relevant as any other thing.  After all, there's no shortage of space on the net.72.78.159.73 (talk) 03:40, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?
Talk:MotorCity Casino Hotel

message: I think there's too much information on politics and Marian Ilitch in here - shouldn't that be over in  her page? Unless the political contributions are particularly notable in relation to this particular casino for some reason, I don't see what they have to do with the casino itself.
Jbmcb (talk) 20:04, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Politics?
Talk:Old Port of Portland, Maine

message: "Because of its reputation for nightlife, the Old Port overflows each weekend with revelers." and... each weekday... wait, revelers? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.25.162.84 (talk • contribs) 
:Surely it took you longer to type that than it would have to edit the article to your liking? - Dudesleeper |  Talk 14:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revelers
Talk:Chabahar Port

message: Since there is a massive amount of information about this single port and the amount of Indian media hype surrounding about how its a counter to CPEC there needs to be a CPEC section. 2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:A4E6:A3F:C283:FD91 (talk) 15:47, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This discussion is already ongoing at Talk:China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. No need to duplicate it here. Please note that it is the not the purpose of Wikipedia to counter any "hype" happening anywhere. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think I should add more CPEC information its actually vital I will need some time to collect information but it needs to be added. 2A02:C7D:14FC:C600:A4E6:A3F:C283:FD91 (talk) 17:46, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Must add CPEC comparison 

message: The article mentioned that the distance with Gwadar port is merely 72 km. It is wrong. The direct distance (as the crow flies) is about 170 km. (Driving distance much more, but we will not mention it.) I have fixed this in the article. Khestwol (talk) 07:18, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, 72km is well-sourced (Jaffrelot), even though I admit it is hard to believe. Please feel free to find another source. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:24, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance from Gwadar Port 

message: No need for last para of intro, please move it around somewhere more suitable or remove it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.214.119.20 (talk) 06:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro espionage

message: There is a mistake here. The infobox states that Iran is managing the port and there's the Iranian flag. But the article states that India has been managing it since 2018.103.246.36.31 (talk) 08:02, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The article states what exactly? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:53, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You can see for yourself. Please read the opening paragraph.103.246.36.31 (talk) 00:46, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operated by whom?
Talk:Jennifer's Body

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 January 10#File:Jennifer's Body CD Soundtrack.jpg. --  Marchjuly (talk) 05:56, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 January 10#File:Jennifer's Body CD Soundtrack.jpg]]

message: I realize there's a separate article for the Hole song vs this movie, but I'm surprised there isn't at least a brief sentence addressing the title and whether it was inspired by Hole's song. The most logical conclusion would be that it WAS inspired by the song, especially since Hole's "Violet" appears on the deluxe version of the soundtrack. But of course we need citations, not a logical conclusion! 2603:8001:2A00:7428:EC58:19DB:257D:DF2B (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jennifer's Body, the song 

message: The redirect Jennifer's Body(film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 05:53, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Jennifer's Body(film)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/February 14, 2008

message: A wide range does not make a species immune from endangerment: this is a non-sequitur.  
The reference to Durban airport expansion, unless it can be linked to an article suggesting that there is debate and controversy over the issue, sounds like one editor's bugbear.  Kevin McE (talk) 01:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Heavy Circles

message: Edie Brickell and Harper Simon are notable musicians (Edie is notable as the star from the band Edie Brickell and New Bohemians) that formed "The Heavy Circles".  They have already had a 15 minute interview on NPR this past weekend, reviews in Billboard, All Music Guide, Performing Songwriter.  Their music is available on iTunes and via Dynamite Child.
Sundowner1646 (talk) 02:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/DiskCryptor

message: First working version of the DiskCryptor was released in November 2007, when there were no plans stated on http://www.truecrypt.org/future.php to include system partition encryption feature. At that time, DiskCryptor was called "TrueCrypt WDE", and immediately a post has been put on TrueCrypt's forum, to announce this new product. Shortly, however, the post has been deleted, due to the argument that the program cannot bear "TrueCrypt" in it's name, as it is a trademark. In addition to that, the developer's of the TrueCrypt, also noted to the developer of "TrueCrypt WDE" that he cannot use the GPL license for his program either, because if he took parts of the TrueCrypt code, then he has to use the TrueCrypt's license as well.
So therefore the next release of the program became known as the DiskCryptor, and the code that was previously taken from the TrueCrypt project, has been rewritten, in order to be able to use the GPL license.
So it can be argued, that the advent of the DiskCryptor was an initiative for the TrueCrypt developers, to speed up their development of the system partition encryption feature, and announce that on their future plan page.
Regarding malware/trojan speculations, - one is innocent until proven guilty, - this is what an accepted standard is, I believe.
:Do you have an independently verifiable source for that historical information? I think it's interesting and useful information that would improve the Wikipedia article, but it can't be added without a source. -- BenRG (talk) 21:51, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Leonese People's Union

message: I do not believe that "Leonese People's Union" is the correct translation of "Unión del Pueblo Leonés". I belive the correct translation is "Union of the Leonese People".--189.33.12.27 (talk) 21:49, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The meaning of those two translations are virtually identical. However, Union of the Leonese People seems more like a hispanicism. --Soman (talk) 13:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of name 
Talk:Transactions of the American Philological Association

message: application_counters/commumity_currencies_counted...google_play#TallyAndMultiplyTo Recieve For.Total Balance Owed to Rightful owner of media viewed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1005:B0C0:3C4A:B99B:9766:EC74:F59B (talk) 19:51, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Technology Student Association

message: The picture of the TSA tie is dated.  I think the new tie is red; there's also a woman's tie.
NotKasparov (talk) 04:07, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't the color of the tie in the picture red?  It looks it to me.  Here's the tie in the TSA store.  Metros (talk) 04:14, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Tie" Picture
Talk:Topless (play)

message: The article Topless (band) appears to be an accidental duplicate, actually referring to the stage play also described in this article. Would anyone care to discuss?
MM 17:20, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger from Topless (band) to Topless (stage play) 
Talk:Transdimensional Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles

message: The Kickstarter for the redux edition of TMNT & Other strangeness recently ended, and included in it is a remaster of transdamitional+Guide to the universe, printed as just Transdamitional. Should a blurb be added to the article in the release section, and if so, now, or closer to the actual ship date? Rhinorulz (talk) 09:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  redux edition remaster
Talk:Allen West (retired U.S. Army colonel)

message: Hey, many wikipedia articles have no references at all. I chose Fox out of several to cite specifically, 'tho originally too lengthily. However, I contend that the infobox and lede sentence about this notable person certainly would not qualify for speedy deletion according to guidelines. Justmeherenow (talk) 02:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry to disagree, although I'm not deleting this just yet -- something that does make this individual marginally notable is contained in the Fox story, about the less-than-fully-honourable way this individual was released from the armed forces.  However, I would recommend that the article contain this information; I believe reference sections should be used to reference facts that are contained in articles.  (I suggest that Wikipedia is where one goes for information, not as a point at which to find clues to hunt down information.)  My disagreement would be with the idea that the information in the infobox and lede are sufficient to assert notability -- I find his status as a "hero/anti-hero in the blogosphere" less than compelling (and considerably less than reliable sources), and to the best of my knowledge, candidates for political office aren't notable unless/until they win.  I'd look forward to seeing the "several" other articles cited, with specific mention of their contents, in the body of this article.  By the way, "many Wikipedia articles have no references at all" is NOT a compelling argument; see WP:WAX.  Accounting4Taste:talk 02:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion?