Talk:Branston (brand)

message: This page reads a little too much like a press release.
Lover of chaos (talk) 11:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: COMMENT

message: I'm sure production moved from Branston waaay before 2004.  Don't think they still produced it when I moved here in the eighties, let alone 2004.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by TMLS (talk • contribs).
Any chance we could get an article that actually listed what is IN this stuff? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.231.242.231 (talk • contribs).
Yeah, good point. OhNoPeedyPeebles 21:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong 

message: :Image:Branston Beans Advert.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 19:01, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Branston Beans Advert.jpg

message: Call me crazy, but isn't posting the recipe to a product that, as I assume, is copyrighted/patented/whatever illegal in some way?
Just making sure we've got our collective asses covered here- y'know how it is. 24.255.200.188 (talk) 08:17, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just listing the ingredients should be fine; they're written on the jar after all. 62.24.203.227 (talk) 18:54, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think you can actually copyright a recipe.  If so...  why are so many recipes a secret? 207.154.101.184 (talk) 00:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Why is egg included as an ingredient in the article? It doesn't appear on jar. --77.99.177.87 (talk) 20:38, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuit waiting to happen? 

message: An image used in this article, File:Branston-Pickle-Relish-DE Front.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 17 October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:39, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Branston-Pickle-Relish-DE Front.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Any chance someone can upload a clearer image?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tallness19 (talk • contribs) 07:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Nb. I uploaded a close-up view of the product to Commons, which is a clear image and is used in the article. North America1000 03:24, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image