Talk:Battle of Arras (1940)

message: ...is nonsense. It failed to achieve anything. The ground taken was recovered in hours. I have added citations to cover the article, it was sadly lacking. Dapi89 (talk) 14:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  British tactical victory  

message: The articles states under the heading 'battle' that Rommel's (7.PD) Panzer II and III were thrown in. Apparently the editor had no proper sources available. The 7th was equipped with 34 off Pz.I, 68 off Pz.II, 24 off Pz.IV and the balance T-35 and T-38 (ref: Jentz and KTB 7.PD). No Pz.III whatsoever. Grebbegoos (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense on Rommel's 7th 

message: Tidied existing citations, added references and parachuted a section into the Aftermath on the halt orders.Keith-264 (talk) 12:46, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE 

message: Large sections need rewriting. It is difficult to distinguish who is German, British or French in sections.90.195.174.161 (talk) 11:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you could point out where here so we can decide on remedies. I apologise for not indicating earlier that it's in Briteng but I've only just installed the script that does it.Keith-264 (talk) 11:12, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written 

message: Moved some and cut others for space and relevance. Happy to discuss. RegardsKeith-264 (talk) 11:41, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pic additions 

message: Links to the 3rd SS Pz Div, is this a mistake? Keith-264 (talk) 11:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 3rd Panzer Division

message: Use German terms by all means but remember to give the English translation in brackets after the first use of the term. Note also that putting the unit number at the back helps distinguish whose side they're on e.g. 7th Infantry Brigade (Br), Infanterie-Regiment 7 (Ger) and that German terms not in English as loanwords go in italics. Almost and about are BritEng and some is AmEng. Thanks for taking the trouble, at least someone reads it ;O) Regards Keith-264 (talk) 19:34, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Just came back to make a note about those long sentences. I really don't have the time to clean that up. But will go once more over my edits according to your suggestion regarding English translation in brackets on first use as well as italics. --Caranorn (talk) 20:07, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Think that's it. Thanks from a retired wikipedian who just can't keep from doing minor editing once in a while and dug a bit deeper than intended tonight. --Caranorn (talk) 20:27, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks babe, it's a bit habit forming isn't it. :O)Keith-264 (talk) 20:28, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: Greetings, thanks for your edits. Would you mind adding the source (Levine 2017) to the References section please? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Greetings is it "Forgotten Voices of Dunkirk? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 18:51, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Thanks babe Keith-264 (talk) 20:35, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that a reliable source? The film isn't. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 20:38, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Thanks Keith-264 (talk) 15:56, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: I have some details if required. Dapi89 (talk) 13:48, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes please. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: done, kept it brief. Dapi89 (talk) 15:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air attacks