lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ilamchetchenni

message: All the points mentioned in the article about the relationship b/w chola-mauryas are controversial. There is no such Purananuru verse states that Ilamcetcenni had a relationship/fight/defeated with Bindusara. There is a only verse in Purananuru, states that Maurya try to conquer Mokur (City in southern pandyan kingdom) with the Help of Vadugas and Kosar kings and was defeated. And this song also not specifies the names of any kings.
Period mentioned in the article is only supported by Nilakanta Sastri. V. Gurunathan (Doctorate and Researcher  in Thanjavur University) rejected this claim in his book[1] and said that these chola-maurya relationships are purely imaginary. So I changed the controversial contents.
1. .
--Tenkasi Subramanian (talk) 07:35, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversial Contents 

message: As the article states, Ilamchetchenni ruled from 501 BCE - 470 BCE. However in Karikala's article, it says he ruled around 190 CE. This makes these two rulers almost 700 years apart. Prakashs27 (talk) 12:16, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karikala isn't the successor of Ilamchetchenni
Talk:Gohil Koli

message: http://books.google.co.in/books?ei=YZN0TdLyJYblrAfGocHSCg&ct=result&id=i02BAAAAMAAJ&dq=solanki+ahirs&q=+ahir  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.21.182.12 (talk) 08:27, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gohils is also an ahir caste 

message: I have just reverted some more additions. Please will people recognise that not everything is a reliable source. For example, royalark has been deemed unreliable at our noticeboard, blogs are rarely ok, and the worldassociationofrajputs is clearly an advocacy group and therefore only reliable for statements about itself. Ideally, in an article such as this, we should be sourcing to books etc, preferably peer reviewed and published authoritatively. - Sitush (talk) 18:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 

message: Since the article has only one sentence, I've redirected it to Kingdom of Rajpipla, which has more details about the Gohil dynasty. utcursch | talk 00:44, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. - Sitush (talk) 00:46, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: rtgghhyjfhygyfghjhgfyu 2409:4080:9C93:E0C1:0:0:998B:A912 (talk) 15:34, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gohil is in Rajput Darbar caste only not in koli cast ,but gohel surname in koli
Talk:Gaekwad dynasty

message: In most books I've ever read, Gaekwar is spelled Gaekwar, not Gaekwad. I am not a Maratha speaker and don't know which is more appropriate, but certainly in 19th and 20th century British documents it's Gaekwar. I am considering moving the article. Any thoughts? -- TinaSparkle 23:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The correct form is the Marathi 'Gaikwad' or 'Gaekwad' whereas 'Gaekwar' is the Anglicised form as present in British documents. I dont think the article should be moved. Salilb (talk) 14:05, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My 1931 edition of "Who's Who" has an entry for "Baroda, H. H. Maharaja Gaekwar Sir Sayaji Rao III", apparently written by the Maharaja himself. Are we claiming that he did not know his own title? Maproom (talk) 12:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: So this list of 137 (or 140) surnames: does it purport to list all the surnames that are (or were) common in that former state, or those borne by Gaekwad descendants, or what?
I can see that the list was at one time arranged in local alphabetical order, but later additions apparently made a mess of that; and I can't correct it without knowing the original spellings.  (For one thing, the transliteration does not distinguish between d and ḍ.)  Here it is in English order.
: Achah, Achal, Adsure, Aher, Asure, Awadhani, Badwe, Bama, Banasur, Belwade, Bender, Bhadkambe, Bhamare, Bhate, Chakrapanee, Chandre, Chkrawak, Chkrawartee, Dake, Datare, Dewle, Dhadak, Dhagad, Dhagdhamale, Dhage, Dhananjay, Dhare, Dhiwar, Dhore, Dhundupal, Dige, Dukre, Duranga, Fhade, Fhakadpale, Gadoor, Garade, Gawal, Gayke, Gaykee, Ghadhawe, Ghenand, Ghodke, Hadke, Hajare, Hamale, Hame, Harpale, Hoke, Jachak, Jadoogeer, Jajwaly, Jire, Joon, Kahar, Kajale, Kanade, Kanhe, Kanjan, Kanle, Kanta, Kapalfhode, Karjaree, Karkar, Karmat, Kasare, Katle, Kawde, Khapde, Khare, Kirkire, Kithe, Kode, Kokane, Lagad, Langde, Lokre, Mabhale, Madkar, Madke, Mahale, Mahalunge, Manse, Maral, Marathe, Mare, Margath, Mase, Mene, Mengune, Mhasik, Mhatare, Mode, Morkar, Mulke, Muluk, Muluskar, Murkar, Nadhe, Nagte, Nakhare, Nanwar, Nawate, Ozarkar, Padkar, Padpar, Padsare, Palkar, Patait, Patre, Pawade, Pawed, Pendhare, Phatak, Pure, Rage, Rande, Rangole, Rodke, Sansale, Saple, Sarad, Sarte, Satag, Sawale, Shankh, Shewde, Shiwne, Sonawde, Surkhe, Tagnaledatar, Takte, Talwale, Taras, Thakar, Tiwte, Waidya, Wairkar, Wawge, Zile
—Tamfang (talk) 20:02, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surnames
Talk:Bhonsle (clan)

message: , can you please help us to move the page once again to Bhonsale. As explained by LukeEmily, this article is not about Shivaji's relatives but Bhonsale clan of Marathi people. All high quality sources in current version are there to testify it.
Admantine123 (talk) 04:49, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest that you do a proper move request. That way if someone reverts the move, at least some consensus can be shown to undo their revert. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

text: ✅   Done I moved the page back @Admantine123 SKAG123 (talk) 16:39, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:Bundela

message: Bundela rulers received constant military support from Ahirs.
http://books.google.co.in/books?id=fghQhiowlycC&pg=PA32&dq=ahirs+yadu&hl=en&ei=k2WdTePCEMPLrQfeyOitBA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=8&ved=0CE8Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=ahir&f=false
Between history and legend: status and power in Bundelkhand By Ravindra K. Jain </ref>
This is not a trusted source..14.102.49.66 (talk) 11:06, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bundela rulers used military  help of Ahirs to expand 
Talk:Naemorhedus

message: Gdr, why do you object to having a disambiguation notice at the top of this page?  Pissant 17:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that you have changed the conditions requiring such a notice.  Thank you.  Pissant 17:18, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Gorals]] 

message: Does anyone have a full access to Grubb, P. Review of Family-Group Names of Living Bovids. Journal of Mammalogy. 2001. Vol. 82, No. 2 pp. 374–388 abstract? It seems that, in Grubb (2001), Nemorhaedus is claimed to be an unjustified emendation of Naemorhedus. Anyone to confirm? Alexei Kouprianov 11:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nemorhaedus vs. Naemorhedus
Talk:Chandelas of Jejakabhukti

message: Chandels of bundelkhand had nothing to do with Rajput so called chandel clan.Holywarrior 08:16, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah you are true but there are other chandela's too,like Jat chandela,Chandela who are not Rajputs in UP,Bihar and MP.Frther the rulers we are talking about never called themselves Rajput. HW  08:29, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a lot and Congratulations to you.But don't you think many of your utterance are not required.Plz don't assume I wanted to vandalise the page . Anyway having made your point I can understand your concerns. Ikon |no-blast 11:45, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This needs to be split up into sections, or have some of the less (not) notable content removed. I know nothing about it, so I'm afraid I can't help too much – the length makes it a daunting task — alex.muller (talk • edits) 19:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Length 
Talk:Chera Perumals of Makkotai

message: This article is extremely untidy, disorganised and has an excess of unsourced material. It has been tagged for a while now but little progress appears to have been made. I am not massively familiar with the ancient dynasties of India but I do not need to be in order to bring the content more into line with Wikipedia's policies regarding sourcing etc. This is a general "heads up": if things do not improve soon then I will be taking a knife to the thing. - Sitush (talk) 11:10, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untidy article 

message: The development of Malayalam language and a unique identity of Malayali emerged during this period.
Actually the period when the Malayalam seperate from Tamil actually is not stated in this article.Ok,please add these infos.Firstly  Malayalis and Malayalam language had not yet separated from Tamil during this second Chera dynasty and there was no Kerala at that time as it is a part of Tamillakam.It is during the 9th-10th the Tamil spoken in Chera land begins to vary due to Sanskrit influences,however it is still major Tamil and significant minor Sanskrit.It is in the late 11th century(after the fall of cheras),the Tamils in Chera land developed their own language which is called Malayalam.Malayalam is major Sanskrit with significant minor Tamil.It is also during this period a distinct identitiy of Malayalis formed.However proper Malayalam(which is spoken till today)evolve in 15th century.--Tan Meifen (talk) 11:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear information
Talk:Gordon S. Haight

message: Gordon Haight's name is well-known if you study George Eliot.  He also happens to have been Lydia Sigourney's only biographer.  Information about his person is rather limited to what he wrote-- no one seems to have gone out of their way to make any biography I could find.  Thus the limitations of this page--trying to list what he wrote (usually in new editions of old books) in a way that is understandable and clear.  If you happen to have access to the article mentioned at the end of the page, let me know.  I am rather interested in this gentleman.  Feel free to fix anything you can verify and cite sources for.  Cheers! --Matthew 17:13, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maitraka dynasty

message: Under the heading Ethnicity of Maitrakas there is a link to Gupta (Gupta) in the sentence "Due to the faulty translation of the opening passage of the inscriptions of Vallabhi kings, it was erroneously held for a long time that Gupta Senapati Bhatarka had fought against the Maitrakas."  I'm working on the disambiguation of links to Gupta and can't figure out the context of the use of the term here.  If someone else could help out by changing the link or letting me know what the proper link should be, it would be greatly appreciated.  Cheers   Rejectwater (talk) 15:05, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to Gupta (disambiguation)

message: The Real Rana (talk) 06:38, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: . The source is very old and modern studies does not support such claim. See Maitraka#Origin for their origin. The Gurjaras you are talking about are Gurjaras of Lata who are different and unrelated to the Maitrakas.--Nizil (talk) 16:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maitrikas were Gurjars
Talk:Rajbar

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition 

message: Hello,
This article was initially created to describe Rajbars of Uttarakhand and the descriptions are still the same. The problem is that some 210.214.165.80 edited this page on 
Revision as of 02:35, 26 November 2007
and changed 'Rajbars' with 'Rajbhar'. the latter with 'h'.
I doubt the word 'Rajbhar' belongs to some other people from eastern U.P. and this should be changed.
Admin ! Please take care.
(SatyamMishra 19:30, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was useless in terms of sourcing anyway, so I have redirected it. If someone can actually come up with reliable sources that show this to be a separate community rather than a synonym then we can revert the redirect and rebuild this thing in accordance with our policies. WP:V and WP:RS are relevant reading. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 15:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem of Rajbar and Rajbhar
Talk:Militarized interstate dispute

message: Which is it?
Are full-scale wars included in MID's; or are they not? 
This may reflect a dispute in the sources, but WP should at least try to indicate the nature of the question rather than being boldly inconsistent. Septentrionalis 17:17, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Shaishunaga dynasty

message: Please see the discussion here--sunil 10:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We have two chronologies in one article, and they don't agree.  Sisunaka / Shishunaga appears to have ruled from 684 BCE, and to have been the first of the dynasty.  Yet here we see Bimbisara in first place.Fconaway (talk) 07:40, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent chronologies 

message: his name was mahapadm anand its anand not and he was a kuru king of anand tribe khukhrain according to hindi when mahapadma and anand combines we can use only one a so it became mahapadmanand and and some think it is mahapadma nand it is mahapadam anand so please do it right and his mother was not shuder chander gupt maurya' mother was shudr he belonged to kuru dynesty that was exit on the time of maha bharat he is kuru king and mahapadam anand was from royal anand family and porus was puru king 
Khatrihistorypm (talk) 09:55, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  about mahpadm anand 

message: Shaishunaga is incorrect because in books of history they mentioned shung not shaishunaga
Because is not connecting with shai or naga so your trying to draw anything and what you think people are not knowledgeable so they expect you,
 Bharat and world people have good knowledge and vibe to understand what you people trying to do is End of kaliyug (talk) 15:59, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The heading you are referring to is the opening sentence of the article which is intended to summarise the whole article. It should not be removed. Instead, it can be modified but only if you have citations for your claim or you can demonstrate that the existing claim is not cited properly. QuiteUnusual (talk) 16:07, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think heading is in correct
Talk:Heraios

message: twojm zadaniem jest stworzyć grę onnline na internet jak nie dasz mi 400 000 zł  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.19.139.18 (talk) 08:26, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kanishka III

message: Guys, just noting that I'm reading "The history of ancient Iran" by Richard N Frye. In page 384 it says:
This hypothesis was shaken, however, by the publication of coin hoards found in Tajikistan where coins of Kanishka III were found in large numbers together with copies of Vasudeva I coinage, but later finds revealed an absence of Kanishka III coins with a great abundance of imitations of Vasudeva gold as well as copper issues.... is that coins of Kanishka III were accepted as tender in the north for a period of time and then not so...
Does anyone mind if I change the "Coinage" section. Since it says Kanishka III does not have coins. Or maybe I am reading this wrong? Link: https://archive.org/details/historyofancient0000frye/page/344/mode/2up?q=kanishka  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danial Bass (talk • contribs) 21:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coins found of Kanishka III
Talk:Sapadbizes

message: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Augustus_Denarius_biga_v.jpg
--Kiss de Băbeni (talk) 18:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanian monetary issue for the purpose of anniversary 

message: IMITATIONS OF REPUBLICAN DENARII FROM
MOESIA AND THRACE
[with 3 plates]
Phillip DAVIS / Evgeni PAUNOV
(Chicago / Sofia) page 398.
Kiss de Băbeni (talk) 21:45, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Vasudeva I

message: 🤣🤣 he is not shiva update your information Mohit atulkar (talk) 00:47, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  🤣🤣🤣🤣 i dont know who is calling his shiva he is not shiva
Talk:Vasudeva II

message: This king (r. circa 275-300 CE) seems to pre-date the Gupta Empire (beginning circa 319 CE). Also, initial Gupta kings were busy fighting the western satraps. Vasudeva II may well have reigned before the rise of the stronger Gupta kings who claimed to have fought Huns or Scythians. Adnanramin (talk) 20:15, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date mismatch re: "Gupta suzerainty"
Talk:Ahmad Shah Bahadur

message: There is a general confusion in this article.
Firstly about the authentic events that involved the ruler Ahmad Shah Bahadur. And the events related to the Mughal Empire that took place during his reign.
This article needs to be rearranged and reconfigured. Fjgdh5 (talk) 00:06, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion

message: It is to be stated that the said page is missing some labels and facts from the infobox. My intention here was solely to add "Javed Khan Nawab Bahadur" into infobox of "Emperor Ahmad Shah Bahadur" as regent for 1748 to 1754 under his title of "Nawab Bahadur". Kindly add this or permit me to do so along with some other modifications. These editions are according to established historical records. Hopefully you will grant my request.
Bodacius (talk) 16:21, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 19 June 2012 

message: I will be drastically pruning this article unless sources turn up soon. - Sitush (talk) 12:33, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 
Talk:Akbar II

message: If he is Akbar Shah II, where is Akbar Shah I? Or shouldn't this be correctly called Akbar II in reality? Gryffindor (talk) 01:00, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah, Can somebody please throw some light on the same? Abbasquadir (talk) 20:31, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Akbar Shah II 

message: what do you think were akbar 11 achievements was he a good ruler? Superbomber9000 (talk) 05:38, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  akbar II
Talk:Alamgir II

message: According to the sources cited in S. H. Hodivala, Studies in Mughal Numismatics (Calcutta, 1923): 287, the accession of 'Ālamgir II to the throne was reckoned offically from 1 Sha'bān 1167 (which should fall on or aboutCE 24 May 1754). Hodivala's book in archive.org for ready reference. Should we change the date? Shirazibustan (talk) 08:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of accession.
Talk:Bahadur Shah I

message: This is the Portrait of Shah Alam II not Bahadur Shah I. The portrait in the article represents the Blind Mughal Emperor Shah Alam II. So it needs to be removed. --86.148.132.58 (talk) 21:37, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Portrait of Emperor Shah Alam Bahadur Shah.jpg 

message: See the sentence ending with the phrase "to prevent Akbar." What was Akbar doing or planning that had to be prevented? Folklore1 (talk) 18:40, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life
Talk:Esperanto-USA

message: Esperanto-USA is a proposed new name for the Esperanto League of North America. This organization has not officially changed its name yet. This article is therefore incorrect. 
--71.96.187.208 17:32, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the page back to "Esperanto League for North America", which as F3meyer says (but note for not of!) is still the official name of the organization. However, I have not fixed the double redirects because at some point in the not too distant future the name probably will be changed to "Esperanto-USA", and why keep inventing and uninventing the wheel? --Haruo 07:49, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

message: FYI: The official name for ELNA has since been officially changed to Esperanto USA.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by NJ Esperantist (talk • contribs) 18:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ELNA Name Officially Changed
Talk:Wild Bill Hickman

message: where is ANY evidence or factual support of the one line claim he was a serial killer? Notsleeping 17:34, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The statement currently is that "he was a reputed serial killer" (my emphasis).  The link supposed to confirm that doesn't call him any such thing.  Further, it describes only two killings for which Hickman was responsible, one "the execution of an enemy spy" during wartime, the second the killing of a man who threatened Hickman's family, for which the charges against Hickman were thrown out.  That is NOT a serial killer.  To quote from the Wikipedia article on serial killers:  Serial killers are people who kill on at least five separate occasions (according to the FBI handbook), taking breaks between murders. The crimes committed are a result of a compulsion that may have roots in the killer's (often dysfunctional) youth and psychopathological disorders, as opposed to those who are motivated by financial gain (e.g., contract killers) or ideological/political motivations (e.g., terrorism, democide).
:Maybe we should say that he is a "self-described" serial killer, since he definitely confessed to more than five murders in his book. Although, I still have a problem with the term "serial killer," even though that would accurately describe his actions. I don't believe his motives were the same as a criminal. Hickman, imo, was caught up in a certain type of religious uber-zeal, which caused him to believe that the things he did was right.KevinM 08:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hickman the Serial Killer

message: In a recent edit,  added the following:
During a time when mormon settlers were beginning to spread throughout the west, knowledge of a Native American attack against a mormon civilization was being spread by a local chief. In response to this threat, Hickman and a few men rode in the darkness into the Native American settlement where the chief lived and decapitated him. In the morning when the tribe awoke Hickman sat on his horse with the chief's head skewered on a stick. Most think that due to this brash act the tribe never invaded the mormon settlement. Hickman was quoted as saying, "sometimes you need to be a wolf to protect the sheep."
I quickly looked & couldn't a source for this tale, or the quote, so I brought this here to discuss. Granted that it's possible this statement is true, but this kind of thing should not be added into a biographical article without at least one solid, reliable source. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 15:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Decapitation

message: Currently all this article has for references is the 1988 Hope Avarell Hilton (generally evenhanded and well researched), and the 1904 John Hanson Beadle (which is completely polemic and by an avowed anti-Mormon). Can't we finds some additional sources? -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 17:26, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: More references needed
Talk:Tuzk-e-Jahangiri

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.history-timeline.deepthi.com/india-timeline-history/jahangir.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  TreyGeek (talk) 03:48, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed