lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mallya Aditi International School

message: Please do not vandalize or remove information without discussion here. This sort of nonsense is disrespectful to the entire Wikipeda community and the project that we are involved in here. -DigsPeanuts
I fact-checked an earlier discussion about the prominence of alumnus Raghu Karnad. His journalistic prominence seems well-known, and is easily verifiable. cf http://www.hinduonnet.com/mag/2006/05/14/stories/2006051400410400.htm
-DigsPeanuts
:Greetings. Please do not term others' removable of uncited information as vandalism; per policy, anything that is not accompanied by a reliable source is subject to deletion at any time (in other words, it's up to you to provide it, not to others to go searching for it). Meantime, 114 Google hits on Raghu Karnad leaves the assertion of "prominence" a little murky... RadioKirk (u|t|c) 17:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prominent Graduates

message: I have removed some biased comments towards the school newspapers as well as some unrequired statements, changes can be seen in the history,
cheers,
skie.
pls mais is the best skool in da world..... go  M.A.I.S
damn, i used to go to this school in 1996 only white kid in my year. I remember Anne warriors office. The article seems accurate but slightly unstructured.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.120.29 (talk) 22:28, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  School Newspapers
Talk:National Film and Television School

message: "The school has enjoyed a reputation as one of the world's leading film schools, although whether this is true today is questionable."
This needs hella clarification.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.120.217.107 (talk) 06:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reputation 

message: 'Its mission statement is to: "make money from old rope."' This sound like a bit of vandalism to me.  Please cite source or this will be removed.  Catwizzle (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 14:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mission Statement 

message: Why has this project been singled out, and why is it given such prominence?  This looks like self-advertisement.  I will remove unless the contributor can justify its inclusion.  Catwizzle (talk) 22:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Projects 

message: Have spent the last few hours extending this article; I've added the history section and the members section, and cleaned up other parts. Enjoy! Adaircairell (talk) 17:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Extension
Talk:Constantine VII

message: This article talks about his brothers mother, but who was Constanine's mother? Common Man 19:29, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: His mother was Zoe Karvounopsina, I've added that now. Adam Bishop 01:02, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. I now realize that the picture caption had that information, already. Moreover, the next paragraph says "Constantine was also born in this room, although his mother Zoe ... " - somehow I was just confused by the word "also". Sorry about that.Common Man 01:20, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother? 

message: Is Constantine's massive succession box justified? Yes he had a somewhat troubled reign in regards to co-regencies and status but does that justify "splitting" his reign into four parts (all of which begin on the same day as the previous part ended) and taking up a huge chunk of space? Wouldn't it make more sense to just list his reign as 15 May 908 – 9 November 959 or alternatively if you want to disregard the first part where he is junior emperor under his father, 6 June 913 – 9 November 959. Britannica just straight up says he was "Byzantine emperor from 913 to 959" (link). Infoboxes are supposed to summarize information (right?) and I don't think this one is easy to follow along at all. Ichthyovenator (talk) 22:48, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The massive succession box... 

message: This article says he became sole emperor on 27 Jan 945, but both the Stephen Lekapenos and Constantine Lekapenos have that happening on the 26th. I just moved the listing from the January 27 article to the 26th, but it was cited to , so now I don't know which one is correct anymore. —howcheng  {chat} 19:31, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It was 27 January, there is no doubt about it. This is the date given by the Theophanes Continuatus (Book VI) and John Skylitzes (s. 237).Tintero21 (talk) 04:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date confusion
Talk:Windows Mail (Vista)

message: Any other wikipedians notice that you can't access web based email (e.g. Hotmail) via WM as you could with OE? This isn't mentioned in Removed Features section but I don't have a source for it. Original Research not accepted, so if someone has a source maybe you could add it to the list? Of course if you have POP access with your Web Based email you can use WM with that, but the http protocols (e.g. Hotmail) are not supported.
This comment was left by §©ʁİƃƀȴıŋ’ Ƨł₥ȫȠ 14:18, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Features

message: Would it be okay for me legal wise to use the Windows Mail icon in low resolution format (64 pixel) like that on the Wiki page? I would not save the image to my FTP but use the image URL ( http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/a/a8/Windows_Mail_logo.png/64px-Windows_Mail_logo.png ) that is already uploaded to WikiMedia. Thanks so much, this is for my contact page on my website!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spencercjohnson (talk • contribs) 00:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd advise against it. First, you're using the Wiki servers for your site, adn thus using their bandwidth for your own purposes, which is not nice. Second, the image's use on wikipedia is informative, while you plan to use it to spice up your own site, which is not considered fair use. Erik 22:35, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Windows Mail Logo

message: Does anyone have a problem if I post a link on how to uninstall Windows Mail? -- (Mrja84 (talk) 12:48, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Uninstall Windows Mail

message: "Windows Mail" is not removed on Windows 7, it's still there (C:\Program Files\Windows Mail\) but it's disabled. It's needed to mess with lots of settings to activate it (manuals about that can be found in the Internet). You might want to add it. Galzigler (talk) 10:53, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows Mail in Windows 7
Talk:Karakuri puppet

message: It is true that karakuri was influenced by Western arts,but not Western automatons. Japanese applied clockwork to Karakuri, though automatons 　 developed from clockwork in Western separately.
And also it seem not to be correct to write that Japan was closed to the rest of the world.
Volclex (talk) 10:32, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Is there a Karakuri Toy that painted? I've heard of Arrow shooting ones and I did find a page, however I can't seem to find anything talking about a painting one. Also the link to the arrow one is http://gallery.scalemodel.net/BowShootingBoy.aspx  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.107.16.19 (talk) 09:37, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:
Template talk:LicenseFreeUse

message: I created this template to combine the effects of TextLicenseFreeUse and ImageLicenseFreeUse into one box.  I have no opinion of the public domain vs. free use debate, I just didn't want to include two nearly identical infoboxes on my user page.
I suppose this template ought to be protected, like the other copyright templates are.  I'm not an admin, so I can't do that myself. 
—Ilmari Karonen 19:33, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I’ve made the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Recent_Game.jpeg But I have legal trouble can someone help me? Gamerknowitall (talk) 22:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I’ve created page 

message: I request that this template be moved to :Category:Wikipedia copyright templates. It doesn't belong in :Category:Copyright user templates it should only be for userboxes. Catfurball (talk) 17:48, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: } see centralized discussion on this at Template_talk:TextLicenseFreeUse#Protected_edit_request_on_26_July_2021. — xaosflux Talk 18:34, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 26 July 2021
Talk:Mornington House

message: It would appear that this has been incorrectly located in Morningto, Co. Meath. However, it is no. 24 Merrion Street as part of the hotel called The Merrion on Merrion Street. The article needs a good rewrite. In fact, I would nearly go as far to say, this should be merged with something about The Merrion. The website's history page states that Mornington House is 1 of 4 houses that make up The Merrion, each with their own history. http://www.merrionhotel.com/page.php?pid=77 --DubhEire (talk) 21:44, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is looking so much better, well done. I will see if I can get a photo of the building over the next while unless of couse someone else does. --DubhEire (talk) 14:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The location
Talk:Little Compton, Rhode Island

message: Trust me, the town is so small that all the businesses are important to the people who live there. If you're not from there, you wouldn't understand.
I don't believe small business should be listed unless they have a special significance.  Delete section? Swegner 19:51, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps a listing of neighbourhoods in Little Compton would clear this up.  I was confused when I read it to.Leah 03:19, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stores and restaurants?

message: I don't think the actress Arden Myrin is particularly relevant to Little Compton.  Especially not right on top in the general entry.  It seems like self-promotion.  There's plenty of "interesting" people from the town.  Someone should take that out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.28.14.89 (talk) 15:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. -- Beland (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ardin Myrin

message: The map shows Rhode Island, but there's no indication where this town is inside of it. -- Beland (talk) 13:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Map problem

message: Other sources, including List of Counties in Rhode Island, indicate that the towns transferred from Bristol County Massachusetts Bay to Rhode Island became Bristol County, not Newport County, Rhode Island. Were some of those towns transferred to Newport County at a later date?
2602:304:CDA6:4260:3CBA:6628:20B9:519D (talk) 23:08, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Compton in Bristol or Newport County? 
Talk:Yurina Hase

message: Her name is Yurika, not Yukari. Please correct. (kanji representation is already correct.)
:When this article was created, this was based on errant info in the Uta-Kata article. This is in the process of being fixed...;) Ranma9617 21:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I notice that Yukari redirects here. There seems to be a novelist with the name Yukari Ochiai so would anyone mind if that name redirected to the anime they created? Tyciol (talk) 05:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

text: The Japanese article for this voice actress says that she has changed her stagename to "Hase Yurina" (長谷 優里奈). Her blog's link suggests this this, but I can't seem to find an exact source for this namechange. Does anyone have more information about this? 110.159.148.52 (talk) 16:53, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong name
Talk:Billboard 200

message: Following Cowboy Carter debuting at No 1, the tables 'Most consecutive number-one studio albums' and 'Most consecutive studio albums to debut at number one' (as well as the name-mentioning text beneath) need to be updated to a record of 8 albums for both
 https://www.billboard.com/music/chart-beat/beyonce-cowboy-carter-number-one-billboard-200-country-albums-chart-1235650662/ ChoShudh (talk) 21:15, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beyonce album record update as of 07/04/24
Talk:Gods and Generals (novel)

message: Gods and Generals → Gods and Generals (novel) – The film receives 3–4 times as much traffic as the novel, despite having the disambiguated title, so the novel is clearly not the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Better to put the disambiguation page there. –CWenger (^ • @) 20:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Much of the discussion here was about the film, back from when the talk page was simply "Talk:Gods and Generals". It was moved to Talk:Gods and Generals (film) with this edit but only just now removed from this page by me. Fortunately, there wasn't divergent discussion going on in the same sections on both pages. --BDD (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Page history note
Talk:Raymond Macherot

message: Apparently a non-traceable user has edited this text. Although I can't find it anywhere on the internet yet, this text rings a bell: It seems very recognizable to me. Unless somebody explicitly states that this is indeed original text, I will recommend this for Speedy Deletion due to copyright infringement. Wim van Dorst 20:06, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, looks like this suddenly makes me "guilty until proven innocent".  Sorry Mr. van Dorst, but your accusation is unfounded.  I did edit this text all by myself last night and I made sure not to infringe anybody's copyright in the process.  The raw information was mostly taken from the French Monographie published by Mosquito (listed in the bibliography).  Feel free to compare by yourself. And thanks for the compliment.  David t 20:50, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

text: *You're welcome to the compliments. A complete re-write is just rather sudden, especially as you're a brand new user without userpage with just a few edits to your name. Wim van Dorst 20:59, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a copyright infringement
Talk:Resource dependence theory

message: The initial version of this articla is based on the frontend of an essay, written by me and submitted to the public domain. This is probably not fully Wikified, so feel free to change whatever you like (including this talk page).Torfason 20:16, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proclamation

message: This article doesn't seem to cite the content of RDT.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.64.24.19 (talk) 21:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint

message: Cw1377 (talk) 01:59, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Add subtopic (theories effect on nonprofit sector
Wikipedia talk:Requests for investigation/Archives/2005/10

message: *  Has repeatedly vandalized the Smiley Xtra page, changing links and information to stupid, offensive and obscene statements. Has done so on several occasions.
:* Stopped last night. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:04, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: * Vandalized again today.  Rolled back.  This editor has never been warned.  He should have been warned before being reported on this page.  I have warned him. Jdavidb (talk) 21:46, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

text: * Has stopped editing. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:07, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

text: * Looks like he's stopped. Report again if it starts up again. · Katefan0(scribble) 16:07, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP Moderate
Talk:Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72

message: I think that this should be called "Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72" instead and a redirect put in at this location to that location Theinfo 20:34, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You're quite right. Could somebody please do this so we have the correct title? --212.202.184.238 23:43, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Head girl and head boy

message: Exams question  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.91.30.239 (talk) 16:41, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government  

message: Duties of a head girl 
102.88.37.189 (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creative writing
Talk:Political football

message: I would just like to recommend that more references be added to this article.  Thank you. --164.107.223.217 03:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The current article is obtuse and displays a clear, unjustifiable US bias. A 'political football' is not so much an 'unresolved issue' (a definition bordering on euphemism) as one which gets looked at and kicked around, not on its own merits, nor the merits of the relevant issues, but dependent upon the participant's political background. In other words, the issue does not get the attention the speaker feels it deserves, but has become subject to 'party lines.'  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.100.250.217 (talk) 08:59, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the history, the original article tried to avoid U.S. bias.  Over time, there has been very little evidence of the term being used outside of the U.S. - which has led to increased U.S. bias.  As for "unresolved"... When something is "looked at and kicked around", it is "unresolved".  I disagree with your opinion that a political football doesn't get the attention the speaker feels it deserves.  It is my opinion that the speaker, which would be the politician, doesn't want to be forced to make a decision and, therefore, never gives the issue much attention. -- kainaw™ 13:06, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most political issues are unresolved and get kicked around by parties of different shades of opinion. So in a sense it could be misleading to pick out one or two, and call them 'political footballs.' But when someone does, this side of the drink, it tends to mean that we feel that it has become a mere plaything of politicians, instead of being given due consideration. Perhaps the usage is different here - and the football, which is given much attention.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.1.109.179 (talk) 20:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obtuse/US bias
Talk:Up quark

message: Does anyone know if there are any theories to the possibility that the Down Quark is composed of an Up Quark and an electron?  I once heard that when a Proton and Electron mix it produces a neutron.  So if this is true then if you mix an Up Quark and an electron it must form a down quark...I am not sure though. - BlackWidower
: Please see my answer to this question on Talk:Electron. -- SCZenz 22:21, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Try WP:HELPDESK for questions. This page is for discussing improvements to the article. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:29, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Down quark composition

message: if some one can get a hold of C. T. H. Davies, C. McNeile, K. Y. Wong, E. Follana, R. Horgan, K. Hornbostel, G. P. Lepage, J. Shigemitsu, H. Trottier. Precise Charm to Strange Mass Ratio and Light Quark Masses from Full Lattice QCD. Physical Review Letters, 2010; 104 (13): 132003 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.132003 it is purported to have refined values for both qu and qd 
Abyssoft (talk) 04:44, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Reference 

message: :
I removed the hyphen, with comment why a hyphen for this and not other values? looks like minus!
This was undone with remarkable speed, because it's compound adjective spin-1/2, spin-1, spin-0 etc
No it isn't.  An adjectival use would be "a spin- particle".  The word with precedes a noun phrase, not a bare adjective.  The article Spin-½ properly uses both forms:  —Tamfang (talk) 13:47, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  spin-hyphen 

message: To keep the discussion in one place, please respond at Talk:Down quark#Similarity with Up quark. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 03:55, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity with [[Down quark]] 

message: Is the "Color charge" field in the quick info box necessary? All quarks have color charge but none have a set color charge like electric charge, so it's a field that is universally just "Yes" which seems kind of unnecessary. This also applies to Down quark, Top quark, Bottom quark, Strange quark, and Charmed quark. —LambdaKnight (talk) 14:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color charge?
Talk:Mount Sapo

message: According to Google, there are thousands of references to "Mount Sapo", "Mount Sappo", "Sapo Hill", or "Sappo Hill" and the origin of soap. More of an urban legend than a hoax. --Brunnock 20:59, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: According to Google
Talk:Influenza vaccine

message: The reformulation section is getting a bit long, and should likely be moved to Historical_annual_reformulations_of_the_influenza_vaccine.
Also the 2022 sourthern hemisphere formulation is here: https://surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surveillance/Virology/FluVac/FluVac2022.pdf
--Onco p53 (talk) 21:53, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  reformulation
Talk:ATA over Ethernet

message: AoE sits above the MAC layer, doesn't it? So it would be at layer 3 of the ISO model, not "level 2". --Booch 19:18, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it the author probably meant that it's on top of level 2, but an AoE designer tells me that AoE is technically level 5, being a remote procedure call sort of thing.  Mentioning the OSI model so early in the article probably detracts from clarity.  Thanks, I'll take it out.  --EcashinCoraid 20:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: An alternative to iSCSI, the AoE specification is 8 pages compared with iSCSI's 257 pages.
This message that somebody wrote on the article, [www.coraid.com/documents/AoEDescription.pdf is this the document you are referring to]  --Ramu50 (talk) 06:51, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 

message: What do you mean by the following:
AoE support is currently being beta tested for the Solaris Operating Environment, Sparc and x86.
?
Do you mean that support for Solaris on top of Sparc and x86 is being beta-tested or what? The architectures are pretty orthogonal to the OS, as Linux supports both these hardware archs too.
Thanks for putting up this article.
Penedo 02:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solaris/Sparc/X86? 

message: Couldn't you use MPLS to achieve this with ATAoE?  Thedangerouskitchen (talk) 12:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not routable accross LANs / small SANs only? 
Talk:Point mutation

message: This is a great page.
It really helped me with my homework, thanks!
Let the sunshine in333 (talk) 01:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Page! 

message: A Single-nucleotide polymorphism is a point mutation that is found within a population. Surely one of these pages should mention the other?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by FergusRossFerrier (talk • contribs) 16:22, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  VS Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism 

message: It has been suggested that Cellular reproduction and DNA replication: Point mutation be merged into this article or section.
*Support - This seems like a no-brainer to me. The other page doesn't follow Wikipedia article naming style and is quite directly a duplicate topic. ~rezecib (talk) 02:03, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The 4th reference, specifically
http://members.cox.net/amgough/Fanconi-genetics-genetics-primer.htm ,
is a broken link.
Tonyszedlak (talk) 18:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link in references
Talk:Mark Brunell

message: The intro should be improved. The sentence about the draft should be at the end of the intro, if there at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Relax777 (talk • contribs) 04:50, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is no reason to mention a persons faith as that is a private matter and should be removed. Marks son isnt the quarterback at Georgetown and also needs to be removed. Marks Bankrupty was handle out of court is a private matter that also should be removed. Ericlmitchell (talk) 23:46, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits to Marks Personal Life
Talk:Quebec Separatism in the 20th Century

message: I've nominated this for deletion because it seems to be nothing more than a copy-paste (potentially translated from French, as its rather awkwardly written) of what is more or less an editorial.  It also goes into the history of the Quebec conflict somewhat, but I imagine there are far better Wikipedia entries on the topic already.  Devotchka 21:42, 25 October 2005 (UTC)