Talk:History of mobile phones

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on History of mobile phones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120207062016/http://www.privateline.com/archive/Ringcellreport1947.pdf to http://www.privateline.com/archive/Ringcellreport1947.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mobilen50ar.se/eng/FaktabladENGFinal.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://star-techcentral.com/tech/story.asp?file=%2F2005%2F9%2F20%2Fcorpit%2F12066894&sec=corpit
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The BBC is pushing the concept that the British invented the mobile phone.  Why isn't this listed as a british invention?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:630:12:1090:ECC4:5605:C7AC:D7A3 (talk) 14:08, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inventor 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of mobile phones. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130117052435/http://www.historyofthecellphone.com/people/john-mitchell.php to http://www.historyofthecellphone.com/people/john-mitchell.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Dear Wikipedians,
I have just corrected the dates of some literary references in this article.  The article erroneously listed 1707 as the date for a Punch Magazine article which came out in 1906.  It also cited another literary reference from 1931 as having been published in 1631.   I am somewhat concerned that this may be evidence of vandalism, as it seems to me unlikely (though still possible) that these would both be legitimate mistakes.  In addition, London is referred to as "Løndon", which I haven't corrected. 187.147.2.114 (talk) 20:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date corrections 

message: The image of the Micro-USB interface has recently been replaced by an image of a USB-C interface by User:Jurian15 claiming the previous image to be outdated for smartphones. This might be true for the higher end smartphones but Micro-USB is still found on the lower end smartphones as well as feature phones. I would like to remind readers that this article is about the history of mobile phones in general (not just smartphones). Tk420 (talk) 20:50, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: By 'lower end' I mean the cheapest models (mainly under £100 in UK terms but I have found some USB-C ports on smartphones under £150). According to a source, cited for the increase in USB-C ports, USB-C has the additional cost of semiconductor content compared to an interface integrated circuit (IC) needed for a traditional USB Type-A or USB Type-B port which is possible reason for the current continued use of micro-USB in the cheaper models. Tk420 (talk) 20:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chargers 

message: Clear bad faith edit - a date changed to one obviously false for history of telecommunications. Other recent user activity also apparent vandalism.  Recognitor (talk) 17:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted vandalism from IP user 199.20.27.59