lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nolan Schaefer

message: You can see, it doesn't look like a wiki. The formatting of the picture is off, and the content needs to be changed into complete sentences as paragraphs as opposed to just quick blurbs
=== Website ===
As of today (27-Jan-2010), the site listed for Schaefer (unmasklyme.com) is down.  Should the link be noted or removed? beerslayer (talk) 08:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As of today (27-Jan-2010), the site listed for Schaefer (unmasklyme.com) is down.  Should the link be noted or removed? beerslayer (talk) 08:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website
Talk:Uniform

message: It strikes me as both unnecessary and very odd that the "Example" section contains a sub-section, "Russian Federation" containing exclusively pictures of Russian women in uniform. This section seems entirely dispensable. CharlesMartel (talk) 20:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Russian Federation

message: It's mostly just a bunch of examples/types. Shouldn't an encyclopedic article have some form of history section?
Where did uniforms start?
What was the first (recognised) uniform?
Was it's use mandated, chosen due to practical considerations, just happened to evolve, etc?
Have (some) uniforms always had decorative aspects, or did it become fashionable at some point? 
Did uniform originally mean clothing and other meanings came from it, or other way around?
Shouldn't there be some grouping of different classes of uniform?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.29.164.155 (talk) 17:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Not much actual information about uniforms?

message: More pictures of uniforms would be good because uniforms are a, amongst other things, a visual medium.
And more discussion of sports uniforms, work uniforms. More emphasis on civilian uniforms.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TwoMetalDragons (talk • contribs) 04:08, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should include more PICTURES, and more information generally
Talk:Suburban Rhythm

message: Man, I just love the title reference of Whatever happened to suburban rhythm? Why did Ed Scott quit?
Made me smile.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.160.26.199 (talk) 05:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Whatever happened to suburban rhythm?

message: in the mid-00's, i saw a band in one of Disneyland's event areas advertised as 'Suburban Rhythym' definitly playing the ska style, but no songs i recongnized - would this have been the same group? or a tribute band?  i know any bunch of guys could have just got together and used the name, but given the location - OC - and the semi-officialness of the venue, the originals might be together.  any word on where they have been since the 90's.Cander0000 (talk) 05:05, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: later work
Talk:PSR B1620−26

message: Are the designations given here actually used in the literature, all I've been able to find is Wikipedia and Extrasolar Visions mirrors. The papers I've seen refer only to the white dwarf as "the white dwarf companion" and the planet as "the planetary companion". Furthermore, SIMBAD takes PSR 1620-26B as the designation of the planet. Chaos syndrome 17:56, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Designations 

message: The nomenclature of this system is rather problematic. Of the papers I have looked at dealing with this system, none contain any designations for the individual components, instead they are referred to as the white dwarf companion, the third companion, etc.
According to SIMBAD, the designations for this system are:
*Pulsar
**PSR B1620-26
**[BPH2004] CX 12
**PSR J1623-2631
*White dwarf
**WD J1623-266
*Planet
**PSR B1620-26B
Note that the planet's designation is apparently uppercase B, which conflicts with the usage of uppercase B for the white dwarf star, and no designation of the form "PSR B1620-26 component" is used.
The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia uses lowercase b for the planet, however this may be an artifact of the PHP system used on that site (e.g. the designations it uses for PSR 1257+12 are incorrect as a result of the system).
Other sites may use A, B and c for the pulsar, white dwarf and planet respectively (e.g. ). One popular site  even uses a lowercase b for the white dwarf star (in the page title - the header on the page is formatted all-caps).
Most Google search results for the designations turns up mirrors of Extrasolar Visions (a popular rather than an official source) or these Wikipedia articles.
In addition, the lack of other detected circumbinary planets makes it unclear what the convention is in this case.
Not sure how best to resolve this issue. Chaos syndrome 08:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature
Talk:Stephen Graham (basketball)

message: How is it possible that Joey Graham, born 6/11/82 in Wilmington, DE has an identical twin, Steve, born 6/11/82 in Brandon, FL. While 
Stevie has a fraternal twin brother, Joey?
:You would think that Joey and Stevie would have been born in the same city.  They were listed as being from Brandon, Florida, when they were at OSU, but that might not be their actual birthplace.  Their bios on Yahoo both list them as being born in Wilmington, Delaware, so I'll go ahead and make that change here.  As for whether or not they're identical, I'm not sure on that.  They do look a lot alike, but that doesn't necessarily mean they're identical.  I'm a twin myself, and while my brother does look a lot like me, we're pretty sure we're fraternal.  -- 68.12.106.243 19:21, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the {}. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
{} no consensus. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:38, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it just me, or is this an overly long article, full of undue weight, about someone who is essentially a mediocre basketball player?  While he has played in the NBA and is thus deserving of an article; do we really need several paragraphs extolling the supposed virtues of a player whose pro career has been so unspectacular?  --EngineerScotty 22:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much info?
Talk:Çankırı

message: == Population? ==
What's the population of the town? -AW 21:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: What's the population of the town? -AW 21:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population? 

message: Had Çankırı ever been a part of Parthia as it is claimed in the article ? And where are the Phrygians ? Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 12:55, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partia and Phrygia 

message: The village of İnandık in the district Çankırı (in province of Çankırı) in Turkey was already settled in the Hittite Empire (1750-1200 BC). Artefacts of this settlement are on display in the Museum of Anatolian Civilisations in Ankara.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.242.70.153 (talk) 11:30, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Albert R.N.

message: I suggest the following:
Made not long after the events it portrays, this film shows the tension and boredom of life for captured Allied officers in Germany in 1944, as well as the excitement and ingenuity of attempts to escape. Their camp is under the overall command of a decent old Kriegsmarine captain but security falls to a vicious and corrupt SS officer called Schultz. A young artist, Lt Ainsworth, comes up with a brilliant plan of escape. In open heathland outside the perimeter is the shower block, to which groups of prisoners are marched under armed guard. A dummy with a lifelike head, christened Albert R.N., is carried there in pieces and, while a prisoner hides himself, the assembled dummy is carried back to camp. The prisoner can then make his getaway. Schultz, however, has his suspicions .....
Hors-la-loi 21:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Could we improve the plot summary?
Talk:Adventures of Captain Marvel

message: I have removed the citation request from this line from the lead: "This serial is often regarded as one of the best ever created."  This is covered in the Critical reception section of the article.  I can duplicate the reference if necessary but I didn't think this was required for the lead section (as it is just a summary of the article itself). - AdamBMorgan (talk) 16:29, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Best Ever"

message: This article was asked to be reviewed to determine if it meets the B-class criteria. I have made some edits myself throughout the article, but I think it needs a few additional fixes before reaching B-class:
*"The film company approached Fawcett Comics for their most popular character, and that publishing house did not refuse." Could this be written better? I'm not sure what this statement means.
*"The much cheaper Columbia Pictures Superman serials..." Do you have a source for their lower budget? Without one, it may seem like POV is being used here.
*The article is well-sourced, but further sourcing will be needed to be granted B-class status. Source any statements that may be questioned by the reader and try to expand the sections that are currently brief. If you need further references, try and include some online ones, making sure they're reliable.
*If you can, consider adding a production photo of the Captain Marvel dummy used in flight or a notable screenshot of the film that illustrates something in the production section.
Mainly, this article just needs some more expansion and a few more references. Look at the template within the film banner on this talk page (by clicking  "show" within the banner). There you will find instructions on what needs to be done to meet B-class status. If you think it then meets the criteria feel free to reassess the article yourself using the checklist or contact me (or the assessment page) and I'll take another look at the article. Good work so far and keep it up. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 05:22, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:FILM B-class review request

message: Back on July 31, 2008, an anonymous IP added a passage, uncited to this day, that the costume was actually gray, rather than the red of the comic books. However, somewhere (IIRC, The Great Movie Serials, by Jim Harmon and Don Glut, Doubleday, 1973) made a statement about people on the set and jokes about how star Tom Tyler looked in the "red" suit. If someone with access to a copy will please check and find it in the chapter on this serial, we will have a citable source contrary to this unsourced passage. In the meantime, I will place a cite request tag on it. --Tbrittreid (talk) 19:37, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Costume color
Talk:Kristang

message: who split up the page into people and language category? i think they're both synonymous with each other and it's so wrong to split these 2 topics up as the structure of the creole language is a function of the history of the people. whoever split the page up into 2, could you be so kind as to fix this mess? - Kevin
:The Kristang language and the Kristang people are two distinct concepts, like the Portuguese language and the Portuguese people. The Kristang people could switch to another language but still remain an ethnic group united and distinguished by other criteria (religion, culture, social network, caste or national barriers, etc.). This has happened to many similar communities out there.  Conversely, the Kristang people could integrate into a larger society, and thus cease to exist as an ethnic group, while maintaning the language alive for intellectual interest.  Or, perhaps, other communities could start speaking the language.Hence the articles should remain split. BTW, note that these are enciclopedia articles, not a homepage by and for Kristang people. Both articles are expected to grow to substantial size, e.g. like Venetian language. Many readers will be very interested in the language but not at all in the people, and vice-versa.BTW, this split is the norm for articles on similar community/language pairs, and any remaining exceptions should be split too.All the best, Jorge Stolfi 06:51, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shin Sang-ok

message: "Shin and his wife made secret audio tapes of conversations with Kim Jong-il, supporting their story." - whose story? The story about being kidnapped,  I assume. But the sentence is not very clear.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.167.53 (talk) 23:59, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: audio tapes of conversations

message: "before returning to Korea three years later.[1][2]" - three years after when?211.225.34.184 (talk) 01:05, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  unclear 
Talk:Mahatma Gandhi Setu

message: please fill the blank attribute of infobox.
Devessh S N Bhatta (talk) 15:07, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Please

message: The first of these is already built (see e.g. google maps) I recently drove over it.
Currently don't have the time to find reference and edit the article. Would someone do this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.226.52.100 (talk) 15:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ponton Bridges 
Talk:Dressed to Kill (1941 film)

message: Maybe this is for the novel.  In the movie, Shayne hears a scream, chases it down, and finds a hotel maid screaming in the room she went to clean.  She has discovered the bodies.  Etc.  It's on Hulu if you don't believe me.
108.45.122.74 (talk) 02:04, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  synopsis wrong 
Talk:"Pimpernel" Smith

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 18:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: did this influence indiana jones at all? a swashbuckling archeologist fights nazis? with a common surname  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.171.61 (talk) 06:25, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  indiana Jones 

message: The article quotes Nina Lagergren and says it was published in her memoirs.  However, footnote refers back to the Pimpernel Smith web page, which does not give a source.  Has the author verified this quote?  I cannot find a record of a memoir published by Nina Lagergren.  I believe the source for this quote may be her acceptance speech when she received the Wallenberg Medal at the Univerity of Michigan in 2000.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.198.210.179 (talk) 17:05, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wallenberg
Talk:Erasmus University Rotterdam

message: Official name and clear in what place this university is located. Wikix (talk) 13:38, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: How does this move relate to Wikipedia:naming conventions? See also Wikipedia:official names. Perhaps this is an example of how consensus can change, and as policies and guidelines document communal consensus rather than creating it, so should WP:NC in due course. Andrewa (talk) 09:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Hi, I have noticed that the History section of the article is a copy from the official website []. I am not sure how to address this problem. I have used this page also to redact the French version of the page and didn't notice it before. I'll modify the French page and consult other sources. I have not checked the rest of the article for possible other copyrights violation. Thanks, Cathrotterdam (talk) 10:37, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyrights
Talk:Mr. Bug Goes to Town

message: This film as released on VHS in 1989 by Republic Pictures under the title of "Hoppity Goes to Town".
--JFP (talk) 21:43, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  There WAS an official home video release 

message: I don't get it. How come Mr. Bug Goes to Town was the only American animated film not produced by Disney during the 40s? Was it because the other studios were too busy producing live-action films and slapstick cartoons, was it because the other studios wanted to make some animated films but they decided not to after the box office failure of said film and the attack on Pearl Harbor, was it because they didn't wanna copy the Disney formula and/or outdo Walt Disney himself, was it because feature-length animation wasn't their thing? Also, why weren't some of the foreign animated films of that decade released and/or distributed internationally? Was it because the other studios wanted to do so, but they didn't get a chance to get the rights to those films, was it because they weren't allowed to get the rights to or distribute foreign animated films during that period, was it because they were worried that they would flop at the box office if they ever did that, or was it because releasing and distributing them internationally wasn't their thing? --Ktommy (talk) 14:57, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Mr. Bug Goes to Town Being the Only American Non-Disney Animated Film in the 1940s 
Talk:Hellzapoppin (musical)

message: Should the Film article be split off from the musical article?  -- Ssilvers 07:21, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split?

message: ...as of late 2006 there has been no legitimate DVD edition.
http://www.amazon.com/Hellzapoppin-Chic-Johnson/dp/B000OV7OVS/
Does this mean Amazon sells pirated material?  -- megA 22:02, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD 

message: I assume that "Hellzapoppin" means something, yes?
206.130.136.162 (talk) 08:27, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a phonetic representation of the phrase "Hell's a-poppin'", meaning something like "All Hell is breaking loose". - Nunh-huh 13:48, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning? 
Talk:Tobacco Road (novel)

message: Although film adaptations can attempt to follow the novels on which they are based, time constraints often force the screenwriter to abandon subtle plot twists in the novel for the sake of more direct ones.  Can anyone point out the differences (whatever they may be) between the film and the book?
some differences I ave noticed but I haven't seen the film in a while same with the book so these are at the top of my head.
There is no facial deformities on the faces of the actors (thus not part of the script)
Bessy does become a prostitute 
Dude does not kill a man
All the cars are fords even wrecked station wagon on festers lawn in the beginning 
Lov Bensey is the only person with a non agricultural job(coal miner)
Ada Lester sends Ellie May at (the middle of the film) to go and live with Lov Bensey because she knows that they love each other
Jester tricks dude into driving into town so he (jester) can sell the car
jester sells the car (accidentally) to a police chief and get arrested 
the family (jester, Dude and Bessy) decides to spend the night at a hotel where jester complains that the light might make him get a bad sleep because he is going to stare at it (out of curiosity).
When bessy trys to make a point and get things her way she whistles and starts a sing along with the local people around her thus (humorously) changing the topic.--70.145.124.100 (talk) 20:08, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different from the movie?
Talk:Swamp Water

message: Years ago, this was the first Renoir film I'd seen and I was shocked by how entertaining it is. All Renoir rated were two supporting actors instead of major stars and posterity is the richer for it. No wonder moviegoers lined up to see two of the cinema's finest actors lead a cast for a change.  Trocadero Thunder (talk) 17:27, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shockingly good
Talk:Scrub Me Mama with a Boogie Beat

message: Does anyone have any thoughts on potential judgement or bias in this article? Wikipedia is not here to tell us what is or is not appropriate. Wikipedia is not a guide to moral right or wrong. Description seeems fine, but statements like "deplorably irresponsible both at the time and now" seem a bit moralistic. This isn't Bing, it's not a decision engine. Kjarvis86 (talk) 20:22, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  The way the article is written is preachy and moralistic.  It doesn't follow the Wikipedia neutral point-of-view (NPOV) policy.  Most of the "Controversy over content" section appears to be original research or the opinion of editors, and should simply be struck from the article.  The last paragraph purports to quote Walter Lantz, but there are no verifiable references.—QuicksilverT @ 08:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Kjarvis86 and Hydrargyrum. Although the cartoon may be offensive, it is not Wikipedia's place to pass judgment. Wikipedia does, and should, contain information on topics that some may find inappropriate (see WP:NOTCENSORED). I think that the section should be deleted until we have sources that can verify that there is in fact controversy over the cartoon. The section obviously contains original research and an editor's opinion, and therefore has no place in Wikipedia. --BurtAlert (talk) 01:16, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted until correctly sourced and not just POV andi064  T . C 17:14, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: While the short is in the public domain, I doubt that the lyrics to the song are, so I suppose they should be removed. I'm not sure of their status, though, considering they're intrinsically part of a larger work that is no longer copyrighted. 108.1.102.69 (talk) 13:32, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright
Talk:Maine Pyar Kiya

message: I rewrote for style. The synopsis was long and muddled; I tried to make it shorter and snappier. Zora 06:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 16:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: Parts of this song sounds similar to "Run These Streets" (Year of the dog). I wonder if one was inspired or copied from the other. If yes, then this information can be included on this page. Thank you. Ravi arnie (talk) 21:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣✅ 09:01, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dil Deewaana" song 

message: * Stardust --Nicholas Michael Halim (talk) 13:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:   Thank you mate!--25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 07:51, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews 

message: Someone has been tampering with the lead section of the article. I have rectified it. Please be advised that I will keep a strict watch on this article. I will not hesitate to report those who intentionally cause damage. Thanks. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 🍁 13:25, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Talk:Holy-Order Sol

message: Holy order Sol is simply a alternate take on the same character, as well as of note that this is the same character in question. It also appears the article will never develop beyond a stub as well. I think a sepearte section should be inserted into Sol's article concenrining this information, respectively. -ZeroTalk 18:28, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge