lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Titan IV

message: The article states:
"The Titan IV was made up of two large Solid-fuel rocket boosters and a two stage liquid-fueled core. It was launched using the solid-fuel boosters alone, with the first liquid core stage ignited about 2 minutes into flight."
Looking at the image of the launch, it seems very much like the core engine is burning as well as the boosters. How come?
europrobe (talk) 14:00, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image seems to show core alight at launch

message: The solids on the Titan IV were not boosters, they were the first stage. Boosters are fired in paralell with the core stage to augment its thrust - hence the name. With Titan IV, the solids and first core stage were fired pretty much in series. The core stage ignited a few seconds before the solids separated. Therefore, the solids were acting as a stage not as boosters. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 06:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Astronautix  call them Stage 0, Spaceflight  call them booster and the core first stage, NASA [www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/press_kits/cassini.pdf] page 35-36 "Stage 1 ignition T= 0:02:12" meaning the core, fas.org  call them Stage 0, Jane's  "strap-on Solid Rocket Booster (SRB) motors were attached to either side of the first stage" etc. Regards, Necessary Evil (talk) 22:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Boosters" 

message: There is a picture - :File:LR91-AJ-11 rocket engine - Thrust chamber.jpg, can it be used in this article? --miya (talk) 14:06, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:LR91-AJ-11 rocket engine - Thrust chamber.jpg 

message: There is a discussion at Talk:LR-87#Number of nozzles and Talk:LR-87#Affected articles that affects this article. Please discuss it there. Andrewa (talk) 23:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of first stage engines 

message: In 'Background' it talks about K-17 (failing in 1998) but in the table of launches it seems to call it A-20 - also for K-32 - Rod57 (talk) 20:25, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serial numbers dont match  

message: Article says 65 were paid for but the table only lists about 38 being launched. What happened to the others ? - Rod57 (talk) 20:29, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened to the other 17 built
Talk:Titan IIIC

message: The 'General Characteristics' is ordered by value:
E.g.
Power plant
Stage 1: --
Stage 2: --
Should it be ordered by:
Stage 1
Power plant: --
Engine: --
Scruce (talk) 12:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Characteristics ordered wrongly? 

message: There is a discussion at Talk:LR-87#Number of nozzles and Talk:LR-87#Affected articles that affects this article. Please discuss it there. Andrewa (talk) 23:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of first stage engines 

message: The abbreviation SRM is used several times without first defining it.  What does SRM abbreviate?
Rv8 (talk) 10:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  SRM used without defining it 

message: Instead of having "Successful" replaced with {} so it will turn green. Also did if there was a failure or a partial failure.  
Like this
If disagree with edits, please revert them. 
04:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited Launch History
Talk:HGM-25A Titan I

message: There is a discussion at Talk:LR-87#Number of nozzles and Talk:LR-87#Affected articles that affects this article. Please discuss it there. Andrewa (talk) 23:42, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of first stage engines 

message: I have added requested citations and deleted the section "Operational Deployment" for two reasons. First I was unable to verify the numbers cited. Second there were no Titan Is deployed in 1961 as the Corps of Engineers Ballistic Missile Construction Office built the bases in 1960-62 and the first Titan I squadron, the 724 SMS di not go on alert until 18 April 1962. (Stumpf,, p 31). There was 1 SM-68 which was launched flown in 1961,SM-2, from VAFB 395A-1 on 23 Sept, 1961 so perhaps that is the source of confusion.The other numbers are credible given the possession of spare missiles by operational squadrons for replacement of missiles requiring maintenance.
Mark Lincoln (talk) 23:42, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor revisions citations added [[User:Mark Lincoln|Mark Lincoln]] ([[User talk:Mark Lincoln|talk]]) 23:42, 12 November 2019 (UTC) 

message: The sections HGM-25A Titan I#Flight testing and HGM-25A Titan I#Service history
give a different breakdown in the missiles built.
For Test Models, 62 were said to have been built, but the number of XSM-68 is listed as 59.
The article for Titan Launches is even more confusing, in contrast to the cleaner article for Atlas Launches, which gives a different page for each decade.
The Flight testing lists 4 "V" type built and launched, the Launches Page lists only 3 of this type. The Flight Test Lists 7 "M" type Built and launched, the Launches Page lists 11; 8 in 1963; 1 in 1964; 2 in 1965. The Article doesn't break down details between test vairants either, unlike the Atlas page which gives SIGNIFICANT detail between Atlas A, B, C, D and the Mercury-Atlas modifications (each of which was itself almost a custom build job)
I may have to cross-check the astronautix & designation systems sites to see if I can get a better breakdown.2603:7080:CB3F:5032:A9CA:614F:331F:69BA (talk) 23:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers
Talk:Voskhod (rocket)

message: It would be nice to get additional data on this rocket, similar to what some of the American expendable launch vehicles have, such as overall length, diameter, maximum GLOW, et cetera.  I realize Voskhod was a development of Vostok and used an improved R-7 Semyorka, but I would like to see more information. The Dark 16:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More data

message: 1st Stage data is inconsisent between info box and article. Once correct data is determined, we should use the info box for the spec data and replace the article with actual paragraphs discussing the history and significance of the rocket.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.140.140.43 (talk) 06:31, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fairly certain the first and second stage stats were just reversed in the info box (comparing them to the very similar Soyuz-LV stats), so I swapped them. Kaleja (talk) 18:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st Stage 

message: How can a rocket have a 129 percent success rate?
Hdgcfcf 22:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  129% ? 

message: I've counted the data from GCAT orbital launch log  - JSR Launch Logs - Jonathan C. McDowell - Launch Log and I got these 
* 1963 1
* 1964 5
* 1965 12
* 1966 14
* 1967 20
* 1968 29
* 1969 32
* 1970 30
* 1971 31
* 1972 29
* 1973 32
* 1974 24
* 1975 28
* 1976 12
Total: 299 launches. Looks like one launch is missing. I posted the script here - User talk:Barecode/Space Statistics#Voskhod
Barecode (talk) 21:25, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Launch statistics
Talk:Harry Kellar

message: About four years ago there was an entire biographical section on Kellar and now it's gone.  Why was it taken out.  Everything can be verified by reading the history of magic.  Kellar deserved to have a nice wiki page not shortened.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.104.60.57 (talk) 08:29, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Wholesale restoring of the article to a state that does not include page numbers for citations (which I added by reading the relevant books) and has an unencylopedic tone is not helpful. Details that were removed either could be not sourced, or were too trivially for Wikipedia. If you wish to continue improving the article, by all means please do so, just don't replace it with a less professional, poorly sourced version even though its longer. Niagara ​​Don't give up the ship 18:04, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Social computing

message: Recently merged in content from Enterprise 2.0, which duplicated some of this article and its references, and needed a context beyond the origins of that term.
There seems to be general agreement that 
* Recent changes in enterprise software related to social computing are significant and of lasting importance
* Many people need a shared place to work on describing this generation of software, its features and uses, and how it relates to the rest of the social computing and enterprise worlds.
* The right name for the new generation of enterprise social software is unclear
** Many people currently call this generation of software, and its surrounding culture shift, "enterprise 2.0", though not all of them use it the same way
** While the term is in common use now, it may not itself be of lasting importance
As such, work on describing this generation of software and surrounding movements has been moved to this page, under the heading enterprise social software.  When there is more than 3 short paragraphs about the topic, it can be moved into its own article; preferably with that kind of descriptive name.  If one or another shorthand for the topic becomes predominant and lasting, the article can later be renamed.  Right now, we need more and better content.  Thanks to all who are contributing to the quality of this and related articles.  +sj + 22:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the definition "social computing refers to the use of social software" makes it pretty obvious that this stub article should be merged into social software (identical scope). dab (𒁳) 19:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One way in which I see these two articles as complementary and NOT redundant is that, as in many areas of computing, the "software" side concentrates on the development and implementation issues, while a more broader are of study is concerned with understanding the motivations, use, and impact of the tools in question.  Here is an example: Mobile Computing vs. Mobile Software. They both have their Wikipedia pages framed in the sort of way that I described (although not exactly like that) Mobile_software and Mobile_computing.  An example that might not follow my argument so well is the one  Educational_Software. In the case of Social Software and Social Computing, Social Software can concentrate on the tools, and Social Software on other broader issues such as how issues of crowd behavior, trust, community building and other issues are related to this new form of human interaction.  I will be happy to take action if others support this idea.  Jsarmi 20:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge

message: I think that social computing is distinct from social software. If no one objects, I'm going to take a stab at rewriting the article over the next week or so. Ascii27 17:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rewrite
Talk:List of New York Mets team records

message: There are several Mets single-season hitting records that could be broken this year. Here is a list of what we should keep an eye out for:
:Slugging percentage: record is .614, Beltran currently at .631 - good chance
:OPS: record is 1.024, Beltran currently at 1.018 - good chance
:AB: record is 696, Reyes has 546 - small chance
:Runs: record is 123, Reyes has 110, Beltran has 109 - good chance for both
:Total Bases: record is 327, Beltran has 282, Reyes has 271, Wright has 260, Delgado has 249 - all four could break the record
:Doubles: record is 44, Beltran has 35, Wright has 32, Lo Duca has 32 - all three could break the record
:Tripes: record is 21, Reyes has 16 - some chance
:HR: record is 41, Beltran has 39, Delgado has 34 - good chance for both
:RBI: record is 124, Beltran has 112, Wright has 102, Delgado has 96 - good chance for Beltran and Wright, some chance for Delgado
:SB: record is 66, Reyes has 55 - good chance
:Extra-base hits: record is 80, Beltran has 75 - good chance
:HBP: record is 13, Floyd has 11, Delgado has 10 - some chance
:SF: record is 15, Delgado has 10 - some chance
--Veronique 22:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006
Talk:The Guitar as Orchestra: Experimental Guitar Series, Vol. 1

message: That would mean more significant effort, with linkage needed for the duplicate article after the one with the incorrect spelling in the title is deleted.  The appropriate links in other articles must be re-edited much as in the first option.
I await a resolution as soon as is humanly possible.  I understand there is a major backlog of changes that must be made, but it would be beneficial for the proper spelling to be inserted nonetheless.
--Kulturvultur 22:25, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting this article
Talk:Fort Mojave Indian Reservation

message: Really? It does not look that way in the map of the article on Mojave River, and that article does not mention Fort Mojave Indian Reservation. אביהו (talk) 20:59, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "It also is sporadically traversed by the Mojave River in California." 

message: There is a very long and interesting section about the discoveries near Victorville, California, that might be connected to the Mohave or the Shoshone. Trouble is, Victorville is about 180 miles west of Fort Mojave Indian Reservation. What is the connection to an article about the reservation? אביהו (talk) 07:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section  

message: hehehehaw. 198.189.104.93 (talk) 18:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mojave tribe facts
Talk:James A. Bayard Jr.

message: I would like to place the current edits under full protection until the previous edits are cited and verified.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.38.134.185 (talk) 02:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not wait until you have citations before you add information? We don't usually protect pages in order to protect unsourced information. Pburka (talk) 03:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just sour grapes from this editor who knows absolutely that he is correct (and may even be so), and therefore is not required to follow standard Wikipedia policies such as those on verifiability, reliable sources and original research.  His contention here and here are to the effect that he, as the "world expert" on the subject, should be exempt from these requirements. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:01, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

text: Since when is it acceptable to edit-war, and then request full protection without even trying dispute resolution? Epicgenius (talk) 00:19, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Protection
Talk:Lærdal Tunnel

message: List_of_long_tunnels_by_type lists a longer tunnel: Túnel del Manzanares 24,931 km. Is the information in this article still up-to-date? Ondřej Kunčar (talk) 20:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I researched into that. The only place I found saying that is the Spanish Wikipedia article on the tunnels on M-30 which claims it to be 24 km, but the sums of the tunnels on M-30 is more than the length of the M-30, no source, and the listed external link do not show the length. The Autopista de Circunvalación M-30 article says the longest tunnel is close to 10 km long. On my Hallwag paper road atlas, on www.viamichelin.com and on maps.google.com there is no such long tunnel. Using maps.google.com I can measure the tunnel to 8.8 km. I have put a citation needed tag on the info in List of long tunnels by type and in the Spanish article. I don't think the length is correct. The tunnel might be under construction or very new.--BIL (talk) 23:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: still the longest tunnel??

message: Has anyone (i.e., The Stig) ever been allowed to try to set a speed record through the tunnel? Just a random thought while watching Top Gear reruns... :) Wl219 (talk) 07:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: speed
Talk:Weekly maqam

message: this article is focoused mainly on the syrian way, when outside of the US (and even within the US in other Sephardi shuls)
 Sephardi-yerushalmi is considered the defacto standard  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.72.241.193 (talk) 04:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yerushalmi application of weekly Maqam 

message: Perhaps the article should be entitled simply Maqam, first explaining what one is, then explaining that there is a different one weekly. Shabbat Shalom. --Shirahadasha 22:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a Maqam? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SkyWarrior 19:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Weekly Maqam →  – Sentence case per WP:TITLEFORMAT – not a proper name. Ibadibam (talk) 19:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 April 2023
Talk:Professional boxing

message: Its full of spelling errors and unless I'm mistaken, it's TOTALLY WRONG. There is no deduction for individual points per 2 punches. One boxer gets 10 and the one that didn't fight as well in a round gets 9, unless he was knocked down in which case he gets 8.
See this article, it should just be used verbatim, although it's probably copyrighted.
http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/mbox.html
:I replaced the totally wrong parts of the scoring section. There are still some parts that could use better writing. Djcastel 15:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the hell is with the scoring section? 

message: ...current Pound for Pound Boxer Román González is probably wrong. There is no such thing as a pound for pound boxer, I only heard of pound for pound rankings. Can an expert edit the caption, please? --Herbmuell (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Figure caption... 

message: There are sections that list off dates and events with no attribution. Does anyone object to adding the insufficient citations template?
Also, might it be better as part of the boxing page instead of on its own? 
Ryanmsfinley (talk) 22:11, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: The Sweet Science is another name for the sport of boxing not specifically professional boxing Unibond (talk) 22:58, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Sweet Science 

message: — Assignment last updated by Petersonr03 (talk) 18:07, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: SSC199 TY2

message: is it just me, or is the page image kinda terrible? I feel like the Marquess should be moved down to, say, the history section, and the page image be replaced by something more appropriate (in the style of the Amateur Boxing Page). Thoughts? Daniel P Botes (talk) 15:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Image
Talk:Ronald Pettersson

message: Is Sura-Pelle translatable into an English phrase or is it a name. It would be nice if it could be explained.  ʘ alaney2k ʘ  (talk) 21:17, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sura is short for Surahammar, where he grew up, and Pelle is a given name. I think I have a reference for the name somewhere. Was working on the article a while back but then forgot about when I couldn't find a reference I was looking for. Shame that the article isn't in better condition, I badly regret that I didn't finish the work back then. —Krm500 (Communicate!) 22:21, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The nickname was not cited anywhere, and was removed. Flibirigit (talk) 21:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sura-Pelle
Talk:Living history

message: I added a few more details about the nature of living history displays, hope that's acceptable.
Salvianus 22:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, I'm kind of tired of bothering just to have it deleted with no reasons given - e.g. my reference to Elliot-Wright's definition!   Salvianus (talk) 15:20, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Living history is a personal connection with historic events. Activity groups are encouraged, in progressive managed-care facilities, to discuss where one was during an historical event, and some details about what one was doing at the time.  Aside from the obvious benefits of memory usage and social interaction, one is connected to the world by this activity, so there is a gain in meaning in the participant's life.
I removed this section because it does not meet wiki standards, it is inconsistent with the rest of the article, and I do not believe it to be appropriate to the subject of this article. Wilhelm meis (talk) 07:51, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call. Salvianus (talk) 17:46, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Living History in Health Care

message: I noticed  and  ... Whats up? Greswik (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor edit war?
Talk:Anthony Merry

message: The article says: 
In April 1805, Merry was again approached by Burr, who claimed that Louisiana was ready to leave the United States.
This is only two years after the Louisiana Purchase, and I think they meant Louisiana Territory, which, at the time,  was all of the US territory west of the Mississippi River.  -- rogerd (talk) 16:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If it is wrong, I suggest you change it, but please cite a reliable source for your information.  It may be that the French settlers of Louisiana were not happy with joining the USA!  I am no export on this either.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:10, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Perhaps you can add something of this to the article.  This will explain the content and deal with rogerd's objection.  I know too little of US history to do so, even if I had the time.  Peterkingiron (talk) 20:50, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

text: I have added something from your earlier comment and filled out his career from ODNB.  I have not resolved the conflict between it and ODNB, but the latter is the better source.  Nevertheless this implies a gap in the list of ambassadors to Sweden.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:52, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Yes, unless some one does primary research in diplomatic papers, something I do not intend to do.  I know Anglo-Swedish relations were difficult in the latter years of the Naopleonic War, but I am not surprised that there should (apparently) be a gap in diplomatic representation: as far as I am aware, there was no war between the countries.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:43, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louisiana?  What are we talking about?
Talk:Dorothy Gish

message: In early life, her mother is said to support the family, and Dorothy and Lillian joined her act, so we must presume her mother to be some sort of performer.  What was her mother's act?  Vaudeville?  Surely there is more info available.  rags (talk) 03:05, 13 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother's "act" 

message: Editors note fyi two new Dorothy Gish images I uploaded recently. Insert as you wish. KKelvinThompson (talk) 00:05, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New photos uploaded