lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Emmanuel Schools Foundation

message: This article is not written from a NPOV, and comes across more like a diatribe than an encyclopaedia article. Allegations about the teaching of creationalism in the schools are highly contested, yet there is no indication of this in the article. E.g. From the Guardian Newspaper, notably hostile to the acadamies program: http://education.guardian.co.uk/egweekly/story/0,,1963511,00.html 'They aren't faith schools and they don't select' --Chopz 10:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Since this is clearly a controversial subject, I thought I better give reasons for changing a few of the external links: I have removed 2
:1)"Cash for Honours Scandal; Guardian News January 16, 2006"
Peter Vardy received his knighthood in 2001 before he sponsored any academies, and he founded his first school under the Thatcher Government. Hence any allegation of corruption here seems irrelevant and misleading.
:2)Emmanuel Schools Foundation (evowiki)
Link's broken
I have added one link: 
: 'They aren't faith schools and they don't select' from the Guardian December 5, 2006
--Chopz 00:16, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: May I Just Make A Note That the School Did Expel a Student suffering from AD/HD, disregarding it as an illness, saying the child was simply defiant. That is fair, and the article should show some expression of the opressive atmosphere and force fed religious theologies, along with the blatant statements that anything alternative is incorrect! You Sir, Are Extremely Wrong  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xchiodosx (talk • contribs) 21:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expulsion  

message: I came to this page from the link in the creationism in public education page. I understand that there is some controversy regarding this issue. But should there be at least a mention regarding this fact (the controversy, not the creationism teaching). Most external links are precisely about this issue. Bas van Leeuwen (talk) 09:37, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something is missing 

message: *The first few paragraphs are a copyright violation of the Vardy Foundation source.
*They're also full of WP:PEACOCK terms.
*This is because the Vardy Foundation is not an independent 3rd party source, but another charity founded by Peter Vardy (businessman)
*In my opinion, this makes the lede very biased.
AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 11:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: How is it now? - Fayenatic (talk) 18:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Considerably better. AlmostReadytoFly (talk) 19:20, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

text: the [tag] refers to only one section which seems to always give the last word to the foundation side.--camr nag 00:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Issues
Talk:Albert Brigance

message: As I said in the previous AfD, I will try over the next few days to get this article in a better state. I know there is verifiable information available to help better establish notability for Mr. Brigance. If anyone has anything additional information in the mean time please feel free to help me out. DrunkenSmurf 20:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Thong (disambiguation)

message: Is this really necissary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.201.16 (talk) 22:42, 11 April 2006
* == Yes it is no panty lines == — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.252.190.26 (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2006 Contrib reformatted to conform to talk-page style, and struck thru since off topic.
* Images are unwelcome clutter on Dab pages. And my impression is that images addressed using lks to outside WP and Wikimedia Commons are not permitted, no matter the content nor the location within WP.  --Jerzy•t 01:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External image link of G-string 

message: Each entry among the following should, when an article is written for it, be copied to the accompanying Dab page, and the copy struck thru.--Jerzy•t 01:48, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed RedLink'd entries 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Thong (footballer). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Paul_012 (talk) 18:09, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Thong (footballer)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Ht-//Dig

message: I don't see any reason to delete this article; this seems like a program that could be of historical interest, even if it is no longer maintained. It could be merged into a larger article about the history of search engine technology, though, if it's not going to get any longer. -- Beland 12:36, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I find it interesting that the author of the prod tag said that is is no longer notable, meaning the editor considered it notable at some point. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 05:49, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm not one of the original developers, but a few weeks ago, I started maintaining the project. In fact, I added international support to it today. I have no translations yet, but I'll be working on obtaining some. The repo is now at [andy5995/htdig] GravityIsForSuckers (talk) 23:09, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion 

message: I'd prefer that this article not be deleted.  I think it is somewhat notable, certain as notable as many other articles in wikipedia.  Cxbrx 02:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid reason for inclusion, and "somewhat notable" doesn't appear to be backed up in the article. Taking to AfD. Chris Cunningham 07:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Erm, if you could find a source for that comment, it would be a much better idea to include it in the article itself than in a plea on the talk page. Chris Cunningham 10:58, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion 2 

message: Since the provided URL (www.htdig.org) has "expired on 04/20/2016" (as stated on exactly that site), how to proceed with it? Instead of "website" shouldn't the infobox state "former website" or similar? DrNobody (talk) 10:36, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The web site is online. It must have been renewed at some point GravityIsForSuckers (talk) 23:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website offline
Talk:Propædia

message: Suggest that this does not descend beyond two levels, which would be fair commentry. Rich Farmbrough 10:34, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Levels and copyright

message: This article shouldn't compare Propaedia topics with wikipedia topics. I'm not sure if I can correct this without knowing what britannica calls se topics:
 The corresponding Wikipedia topics are:
 #Matter and Energy
 ##Atoms, Nuclei, ......
 etc.
--Snargle 06:08, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a printed Propaedia from 1976, if you still want to know what it says. Or has the issue been corrected by now? Aurodea108 (talk) 03:45, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: wp self-references

message: It could be mentioned that the classification system used by Propaedia is nearly identical to JHSI - Joel's Hierarchical Classification System by Joel Jones, which was supposed to categorize Internet sites in its early time 1993f. --193.17.243.4 09:28, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification System

message: According to Encyclopædia Britannica the encyclopædia uses British spelling.  Why not follow it in this article? JIMp talk·cont 15:44, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling
Talk:Ingleburn, New South Wales

message: The first sentence of the History section does not have a citation or other means of verification.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by OzWoden (talk • contribs) 07:32, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification of supposed facts 
Talk:PowerAnimator

message: The article says "It was the most widely used non-proprietary software in the visual effects and animation industries", but its license is listed as proprietary. I'm editing this out for now. - Someone Else  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.238.201.184 (talk) 03:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proprietary

message: Is the list of 'documentation' really useful/important/encyclopedia-like ? 2A01:E35:8AAD:8950:1811:E050:4C27:8945 (talk) 20:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Documentation
Talk:Scottish Jacobite Party

message: Started this article today after just finding about the party's existence.  It is unclear whether they are serious or a Scottish attempt at a Monster Raving Loony Party.  Some of their ideas are pretty outlandish to say the least, but they may well be serious in holding them.  This is why I have avoided stating whether or not they are a "joke" party or not - suppose that might be clearer when (or if - I expect they will fade fairly quickly) they stand for election.  Big Jim Fae Scotland (12.00pm, 12 Sept 2005)
This is a hoax, started by one of the regular commenters at www.Politicalbetting.com blog.
It is not registered with the Electoral Commission:
Search - Jacobite
This article should be referred to Articles for deletion.
--Mais oui! 23:27, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If I suggested that Prince Charlie was a republican (not like Bush, but a leftist), at best that would be a phoney. Even Charlie should be immune to such accusations, as he was still more absolutist than the Hannovers. Modern interperation indeed, it only is an imagenary of Robert Burn's poems. (82.134.28.194 (talk) 06:29, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rob Mills

message: Can anyone vouch for the accuracy of this edit (which, although amusing, may not be true!) -- Chuq 11:06, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this the same as the '80s Dark Wave trio seen here? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1IimecXiMnM (Albert Mond (talk) 06:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The MegaMen
Talk:Lake Ridge Academy

message: This page continues to resemble an advertisement. To provide one particularly salient example, the statement that "The Burton D. Morgan Center for Entrepreneurial Studies involves students in a new way of doing things and a new way of seeing things" is definitely not encyclopedic. The same tone pervades the entire article. I plan on rewriting it in the near future. Simonster (talk) 16:55, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:MaxDB

message: The reasons for move copied from the entry on the WP:RM page
# MaxDB is the current name
# Most Wikipedia links go directly to MaxDB
----
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
===Discussion===
:Add any additional comments
===Discision===
Page moved. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 01:01, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Page moved. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 01:01, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discision

message: This article is full of promotional language. Unsurprisingly, it has been edited CJCollier who works for MySQL!
:Can you give one example of promotional language here? Looks very fair to me. 212.76.37.180 13:59, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's hard to find someone who knows much about MaxDB because it apparently wasn't used much outside of SAP even when MySQL was promoting and distributing it.  I think an anonymous posting on Slashdot  thread 1267023, comment 28318559 sums it up well.  "The first problem was that there were practically no external contributions as the code base is very complex and at that time important parts of it were PASCAL. ... The second problem was missing commitment from MySQL. ... It's a pity for me not being able to look at the source code anymore but I doubt that there is a large number of people affected by this."  SAP also has strong nondisclosure provisions in the license that applies to customers, partners and evaluators. Note that I'm probably tained as well, since I'm currently attending SAP/ABAP training (internal, at a company other than SAP).  The training-instance I have access to runs on DB/2. DavidLeeLambert (talk) 13:53, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 

message: Since MaxDB released for while with GPL, is that license still considered valid for that source code? 
Is such a source code still available?
Are there any products derived from GPL'd MaxDB?
65.166.51.6 (talk) 18:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  is MaxDB GPL Source Code still available? 
Talk:Sharity

message: Is "sharity" not a common enough name for media redistribution to call for a disambiguation page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.180.126 (talk) 21:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, no, it's not.  I've never heard it as anything other than the name for that particular SMB client implementation.  Guy Harris (talk) 22:32, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

text: More specifically: there are no other WP articles named "Sharity", so what would you be disambiguating?--NapoliRoma (talk) 23:09, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Note that the third link (reddragdiva LiveJournal) is my own blog. If others think it's not a fair reference, or if there's a better one, feel free to remove it. The point of it was to show other Solaris admins recommending it as a way to go rather than using NFS from SFU.
You can tell this article was written from personal experience ;-) - David Gerard 11:16, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Self-reference
Talk:Jim G. Shaffer

message: This article has been kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 11:24, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD debate link

message: I've added info on Shaffer's views on the similarities between sanskrit and western languages; may I suppose that both ideas have attracted very limited scholarly attention in the scholarly literature, to put it mildly? NB: note that Shaffer, in essence, argues for a non-Indian origin of Sanskrit. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:25, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of Sanskrit
Talk:River Ingrebourne

message: I have re-written this article in this form using the information at this pdf file. I also felt that it contained too many unarticled (ie red!] references. I also used the OS map to check my facts. I felt that the main thrust of the article should be that the Ingrebourne is very much a rural river in an urban setting, and that this was not brought out originally. The fact that we are in the Thames Gateway is also relevant - so much is made of the "covering the land with concrete" in that context that it is important to stress the other side of the coin. Peter Shearan 11:25, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-written
Talk:FEMA (disambiguation)

message: Until Sept 11, 2005, "FEMA" redirected to Federal Emergency Management Agency of the United States.   Today, User:ManuBhardwaj made "FEMA" into a disambiguation page, with two items:  "Federal Emergency Management Agency of the United States" and "The Foreign Exchange Management Act of 1999, India".  The latter article does not exist as of this moment. 
It may well be that the Indian FEMA is more important (in the sense of: affecting  the lives of more people) than the US-FEMA.  However, within Wikipedia, most links pointing to FEMA refer to the American one (given that the article about the Indian one does not exist yet). Who is going to change all these links?  (See Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Fixing_links_to_disambiguated_topics.) 
I think a better solution is to have FEMA redirect to the US-American FEMA, and to include a message on top of that page. -- Aleph4 11:26, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguate vs redirect

message: It was pointed out to me that my closing statement for this discussion was inadequate. While this is true, and I agree; I also still endorse my close. So here is the revised closing statement: The proposer stated U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency is not the primary topic for title FEMA, and requested the move. At conclusion, we had three editors who opposed the move, and one who supported it. While the supporting editor presented pageview analysis for support, another editor pointed out the flaw in that theory. The three editors who opposed the move simply stated that U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency is primary topic for the title FEMA. Thus making the outcome of discussion as no consensus.
:Even though I went through the discussion, and decided the closure carefully; while making the closure edit I typed in "not moved per no consensus". I apologise for that. Regards, —usernamekiran(talk) 19:33, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: post-closure edit
Talk:Nuremberg and Vietnam

message: How was the book received by the American public? I assume it was controversial.Richard75 22:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Response? 
Talk:Battle of Colachel

message: This article tells us what happened before the battle and after the battle, but not what happened during the actual battle itself! Maury 12:13, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Just saw this now. No, my concern here is that the battle was apparently a naval one, but there is no detail at all on any naval actions. There's detail on a land action by marines, but I'm not sure this is the same thing? Maury 21:48, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right.  Maybe I should drop the word naval from the first sentence. mkamat 13:49, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Just read the article, seems more of a land battle by naval personnel that a naval battle. Eitherway just writing naval forces is bound to cause some problems. Dryzen 14:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

message: While the composition of the Travancorean Army was mainly of Nair origin (and was known as a Nair Brigade), the army was not exclusively Nair. Prof. Elanakom and Prof. Menon have mentioned about the cavalry troops from the "Tamil country" and the role of other communities (Thevar, Nadar, Muslims, Arayans, etc) in the Travancorean army. In view of this, I would like to revert the wordings of the article to a previous versions. 
Please do not hesitate to correct my views (based on the works of Profs. Elankom and Menon) with peer reviewed works of authentic and qualified historians.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.11.77.203 (talk) 16:49, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nair troops 

message: There was no nair brigade during 1800s and was only formed after 1800s.The claim of nair brigade is false and marthanda varma was an enemy of nairs, which was a well know fact in history.The problem with kerala history is that it is not secular and it is predominated by caste based historians and their views ,are influenced in official history even if there is no proofs.An article, given in external links, by eminent journalist Bhaskar says battle participation by local fishing community — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.96.39.113 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Nair Brigade at that time 

message: There was a statement about the ethnicity of the majority of the Travancorean army in the "Battle" section and that particular statement had nothing to do with the outcome nor were there any references supporting that claim. I have removed that sentence. Unfortunately, none of the qualified historians talk too much about that issue.
There are no historical statements about the role of any particular groups in the Travancorean army. I understand that many groups were present in it. Not just nairs and nadars. So, unless there is a peer reviewed article from a decent historian, I feel that one should not write anything about the composition of the army  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.11.206.145 (talk) 13:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle and communities
Talk:IDMS

message: There are a few phrases in this article that come over as being rather subjective. "A marketing mistake"; "poorly thought-out". There are also unnecessary adjectives/adverbs which tend to diminish the article's authority, e.g. "extremely successful" rather than just "successful". Anyone object if I try and make it a bit more neutral?
Mhkay 12:32, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Try the entire article.  The sleight of hand used to describe IDMS as no longer existing--"was", "once", etc.--are telling of a biased author.  IDMS is a product that has full support of Computer Associates.  Older versions may no longer have TCC or client-care support, but those on the latest release can find tons of reference materials, user conferences sponsored by CA and training by CA.  And, having been exposed to relational database development, I can state that is does not offer a greater advantage in terms of productivity or flexibility.  Changes to database tables require revisits to stored procedures, triggers and ad hoc queries that may be impacted with poor performance; addition of an index to a table will slow an optimized query to a snail's pace.  So, development involving relational databases matches traditional database design--scores of requirements meetings, tedious design sessions and ego-deflating reviews by database administrators.
So, the demise of network models, and IDMS, are about as exaggerated as claims that IMS is defuct.  Both models and products drive a tremendous number of transactions, including most bank functions via ATM.
(above comments were unfortunately unsigned)
I coudn't find the word "once". The article largely uses the present tense in describing characteristics of the product, and the past tense in describing its history, which seems fair enough. The article does make it clear that IDMS is still in use today. But I don't think anyone would claim that it attracts many new users. It doesn't read to me as if the authors (collectively) have any axe to grind against IDMS, rather it reads to me as if it has mainly been written by people who were fond of the product and sad to see it overtaken by events. If there's a valid criticism of the overall tone of the article, it's the usual one that it's written with the help of a lot of personal knowledge but very little verifiable evidence.
Mhkay (talk) 23:59, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  a few phrases dripping with subjectivity?? 

message: I wish there was some information in this article about migrating data fra IDMS.
Mammux (talk) 09:47, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Migration
Talk:Betul district

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:50, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: At some point this needs to be moved by an admin to its grammatically-correct form, Betul District. — LlywelynII 09:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Richard N. Goodwin

message: I removed "He is the author of several books, including 1992s Promises to Keep, which had a sizeable influence on that year's presidential campaign.". There's a ton of books named that. One of them is the internal link, but that one was not written by Goodwin. And I can't find a book of this name written by Goodwin, either. Algae 12:52, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it. I'm too lazy to add it back today, but it's . Odd though, you would think that such an influential book had more than zero reviews on Amazon even if it is over ten years old. Algae 21:05, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This needs to be known.2601:447:4101:41F9:25A9:61AB:CFC0:24B6 (talk) 14:14, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Goodwin Noted How He Conned Guevara

message: Ancestry.com has a copy of a town record (Lincoln, MA) of his marriage to Doris Kearns Goodwin. In that record, it says his parents' last name was Ginsburg. It's definitely them, everything else matches. Anyone know anything that can corroborate this? Cermus (talk) 23:34, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Parents' Name