lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CB4

message: Of the three reviews given, two are negative and one isn't a review at all, but a promotional interview with the star and director of the movie, who MAY be a bit biased. Consider fixing this, won't you? InedibleHulk (talk) 06:06, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed Reviews?  

message: When I saw this film in the theater, the only thing which caught my attention was the part where the group split up and went solo, particularly the video for "I'm Black, Y'all".  20+ years later, it's pretty much the only part of the film which anyone even remembers anymore.  I would dare to say that it's almost a meme.  Therefore, it's really not surprising that the article fails to mention it.  Then there's the aspect of what was being lampooned.  As I remember, Gusto became an Eazy-E clone, but "I'm Black, Y'all" was a parody of Professor Griff's spat with and departure from Public Enemy. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions  09:34, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "I'm Black, Y'all" 

message: Originally this article stated: The film follows a fictional rap group named "CB4", named after the prison block in which the group was allegedly formed (Cell Block 4).
On 7/27/18 I changed the line to: The film follows a fictional rap group named "CB4", named after the prison block in which a local club owner/drug dealer named Gusto was incarcerated (Cell Block 4).
Someone undid my revision the same day. 
What I posted is correct, what was there (and is now back) is not correct. 
Here is a quote directly from the movie: "Cos from now on I'll be known as MC Gusto. We'll be Cell Block 4, after the joint they threw Gusto in." 
Source: https://www.springfieldspringfield.co.uk/movie_script.php?movie=cb4
To anyone who has more power than me, maybe you can fix the article and not get it immediately switched back to false information?
Sadchild (talk) 18:43, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the group's name
Talk:Caddyshack II

message: I removed a reference from the Plot section. Plot sections should not need references, the film itself is the source. The reference was only to a page containing quotes from the film, including a joke about the ethnic background of a character. (The plot section doesn't even do a good job of elaborating the underlying racism and snobbery which is presumably the reason the characters ethnicity was highlighted.) -- 109.78.193.37 (talk) 14:05, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: Someone screwed up the reference to the AV Club interview with Harold Ramis. Diff The replaced the link to the AV Club website with a link to Latimes.com for someone unknown reason. The website named in the reference and the target URL clearly do not match but no one reverted or challenged the edit and it is too late to cleanly revert it now, it is a pity it took this long for anyone to notice. I'm going to restore the original link to the AV club interview now. -- 109.76.130.202 (talk) 04:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference wrecked 

message: * "Though Kate is embarrassed by her father's actions, she is still loyal to him, as evidenced when she commiserates to Miffy"
* "Eager to improve her lot in life, she makes friends with Miffy Young (Chynna Phillips), a snooty WASP girl"
These are two examples of the terrible quality writing in the Plot section that have continually been returned to the current version. The rest of the text appears to me to offer no better understanding of the plot of this film than the shorter version does, and only serves to bulk up the section with unnecessary prose. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 13:30, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: And you couldn't possibly have improved the prose while still also following the WP:FILMPLOT guidelines that recommend keeping the plot section between 400-700 words? The prose was poor but an excessively short Plot section is also suboptimal. I have tagged the section as needing  instead.  -- 109.78.203.135 (talk) 17:48, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  FILMPLOT is a guideline but there's no mandatory minimum word count and we should use common sense where appropriate. I think the current text provides readers with a sufficient understanding of the plot. If someone feels additional detail is missing they're free to add it. I don't have a problem with the template you've added. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 19:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  It may not be mandatory but the guideline very clearly does recommend a minimum. If any editor feels the plot section would benefit from more detail they can certainly add it. Not planning on rewatching the film anytime soon but I might get around to it eventually. -- 109.78.203.135 (talk) 19:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I tried watching a couple Youtube clips to get more to fill out the plot and that was as much as I could handle. It's really terrible. EnPassant♟♙ (talk) 21:14, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terrible quality writing in the Plot section
Talk:Lucy Hobbs Taylor

message: Searching for "First Female Dentist" on google reveals several sources that seems to refer to Emeline Robert Jones instead of Lucy Hobbs Taylor as the first female american dentist.. such as this, although referencing from other sites suggests that Emeline Robert Jones entered the practice only in 1855.
:Taylor was the first to receive a doctorate in dentistry.  Emeline Robert Jones and others practiced dentistry before Lucy Hobbs Taylor, leading some to label Jones as the first dentist.  However, it is impossible to evaluate claims of practicing dentistry (what about the pligrim mother who pulled out her son's tooth,etc.), and it is commonly acknowledged that dentists must hold dental degrees, so, many resources label her the first american woman dentist.  Of course, the claim is somewhat disputed as are most claims to be the first anything.  Thanks. Cool3 19:47, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Dentist? 

message: She was the first female American to become a dentist!!!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pennington6 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucy Hobbs Taylor 

message: Lucy Hobbs This is a nice page on Lucy Taylor that has an interesting quote,  "I am a New Yorker by birth, but I love my adopted country -- the West. To it belongs the credit of making it possible for women to be recognized in the dental profession on equal terms with men," along with a great timeline of her life. Tylerjdaniel (talk) 04:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucy Hobbs fact and quotes 
Talk:Vital heat

message: The ancient theory of why we need to breathe! Truly creative for a pre-chemistry world. Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 01:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ah! 

message: The stub Pneuma (ancient medicine) might be better as a section of this article, as the two concepts seem so closely related as to be hard to distinguish. Cynwolfe (talk) 20:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should "Pneuma (ancient medicine)" merge into "Vital heat"? 

message: I am editing this article for a class project for a history of science class at the University of Oklahoma.  I am posting the new page today 3/25/2014.  Although I still intend to add some more content under the Aristotle title line my current thoughts are finished.  If there are any problems please contact me and let me know so I can fix them, and in the mean time you may revert back to the old content until I have fixed the problems. Any and all feedback would be appreciated.
Walkerc84 (talk) 20:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing
Talk:The Cat from Outer Space

message: hi was the catpaid for this hard work thakns  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.211.242.13 (talk) 11:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see you have just watched this film on BBC2. EchetusXe (talk) 12:06, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: me too :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.49.152.126 (talk) 01:48, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is a charming film. It would be nice to have a slightly larger article and one that doesn't rely so much on imdb. Gingermint (talk) 22:09, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Research
Talk:Shahab-4

message: The Shahab-4 is being made to put satellites into orbit, and not to be used as a weapon. Any information that is spread about this missile is guess work by people who are looking to add some new news to their sites, nothing more. There is absolutely no information given by Iran about this missile other than it being developed and that it's purpose is putting Iran's satellites into space. User:ArmanJan
: The Shahab 4 is an ICBM, right?  I may be mistaken, but can't all ICBMs be used for dual purposes (space/intercontinental offense)?  It's probably more neutral to say that it's an ICBM, officially part of the space program, and leave it at that.  --Chris Thompson 03:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shahab-4

message: The article says "a circle of equal probability of 2,400km". I see four mentions of CEP in the document (but it's massive - we should cite the specific page of such a large source), and all pertain to the Shahab-3.  For that missile, they estimate a CEP of 2,3, or 5 km. Which is what you'd expect for a missile of this class. The Shahab-4 having a CEP of 2400 km has to be an error - presumably it's meant to be 2400 m. But where specifically is the source for that? -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 10:35, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  CEP
Talk:Alfred P. Murrah

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Alfred Paul Murrah was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 16:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--TommyBoy (talk) 03:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Edward K. Gaylord

message: What is the subject of this article?  E.K. Gaylord, E.L. Gaylord, The Oklahoman, or the Gaylord family in general?  Can't we just have an article about Edward K. Gaylord here?SEWalk (talk) 18:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Federal Acquisition Regulation

message: The article doesn't state who the regulations are promulgated by...although neither does http://www.acquisition.gov (or, if it does, it isn't very clear.) Paul 00:46, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would disagree.  While the FAR are a subset of Government Contracts, the FAR are sufficiently broad in detail that it would overwhelm the Government Contract article.  It would be like putting all of the USA article as a subsection of the article on North America.ThreeE 02:30, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who promulgates 

message: I don't have any idea what is being said in this article. Can this be restated in layman's terms? Thanks. 98.202.38.225 (talk) 20:16, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a one line intro to give some context. - Rod57 (talk) 19:30, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't understand 

message: We may need a program of record to clarify. Many US articles use "Program of Record" but what are they ? - Rod57 (talk) 19:32, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any relation to 'program of record' ? 

message: Agencies can sometimes use alternative less-bureaucratic processes : eg NASA have used Other Transaction Authority for Commercial Resupply Services/COTS and Commercial Crew, DARPA used for SC-21 (United States), SeaBees/CIA used, Defense Innovation Unit used, used for XM395 Precision Guided Mortar Munition, and Army used for LAV-25 replacement. Could mention in this article, eg. so they could be compared. - Rod57 (talk) 19:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a section on Other Transaction Authority with a brief discussion. Feel free to expand. A dedicated article may be helpful to provide an in-depth discussion of the statutes for each of the 11 agencies that were granted the authority. Thank you. Path2space (talk) 16:39, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternatives - such as Other Transaction Authority
Talk:Owen Garriott

message: *What did he do with spiders? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.169.113.63 (talk • contribs) 22:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spiders

message: " Garriott received a NASA fellowship for [an unspecified word is missing here in the article text] in the Space Station Project Office" SalineBrain (talk) 09:44, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  NASA fellowship for?
Talk:Christmas with the Kranks

message: Why is Felicity Huffman described as "William H. Macy's wife"? None of the other actors are described by their spouse.Spurgistan (talk) 20:03, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  spouses's names 

message: 'Bold text'
I hate to ruin the fun, but that JonTron video that inspired people to vandalize it? The video was long ago copyright-smoten, but an archive by a channel dedicated to doing that for Jon's videos JUST uploaded it again, and added an alternate title. Pretty funny, but also I think you'd like to know. 2601:245:C001:81D:8DAF:543F:89D6:788D (talk) 04:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 January 2017
Talk:Cinderfella

message: How do I find a copy of that comedy routine?  Was it Jerry Lewis on the recording? I heard it on the radio in 1964-65.  I think it was called Cinderfella and the Two Sister Uglies. Have searched periodically for years. Harriet Mann --Pencildetail (talk) 07:14, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio recording of Cinderfella - who did comedy routine in mid sixties 

message: The scene where Jerry Lewis descends the staircase is seen from directly behind him, which means there would have been a camera at the top of the staircase, and directly in front of him, which means there would have been a camera at the bottom of the staircase. There is no way that was shot in one take without either camera being visible to the other.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Whostosay (talk • contribs) 17:49, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Staircase Scene
Talk:PIP

message: Usually, WP:NOT a directory or collection of external links.  I'm thinking about converting the external links to redlinks, the idea being that notable uses of the PIP acronym should get their own articles if they qualify.  I'll check back in, oh, a month or two.  In the meantime, feel free to comment below.  --Alan Au 00:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: companies and organisations
Talk:California State University, Fullerton

message: This section should be deleted.  Most universities have been the site of murders at some time in their past, and CSUF does not stand out in any way in that regard.  Nearby UCI, UCLA, and USC, for instance, have all had notable murders, yet their Wiki pages make no mention of them. 130.76.186.15 (talk) 20:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campus Violence - DELETE
Talk:Billy Sims

message: The article mentions Barry Sanders as a player who wore Detroit's #20 after Billy Sims, but the person who wore that number before Sims didn't do too badly, either: Pro Football Hall of Famer Lem Barney. 147.70.242.40 (talk) 20:47, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detroit's #20 

message: This article contradicts the Steve Worster article on number of 100-yard games. Which is right?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.111.86.76 (talk) 10:30, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steve Worster 

message: I'm not certain that this is material which belongs on Wiki at all, although it does seem notable that he has now yelled "Boomer" in a somewhat disruptive manner at the ceremonies for both White and Bradford. If it is going to stay up it needs to say what the source article represents though, not call him a hero for it. GatorOne (talk) 16:16, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The part about yelling Boomer at "inappropriate" times needs to go. But the accusation of upstaging can stay as long as it is worked into the body of the article and not the trivia section.↔NMajdan•talk 15:06, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've written this and placed it in the "Post-NFL Years" section following the description of his Heisman Park statue: "He has enthusiastically tried to start the "Boomer! Sooner!" Oklahoma cheer immediately following the naming of the winner at the Heisman Trophy induction ceremonies of the two most recent Oklahoma Sooner winners, Jason White and Sam Bradford, but many in the media have criticized his antics as upstaging the winner." Feel free to edit it or move it around or whatever, just tried to write something a little more professional sounding than the section calling him an ass that has been posted, deleted, restored, deleted, etc. GatorOne (talk) 16:08, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boomer Yell in Trivia Section
Talk:Donald Bakker

message: When is 1 1/2 years from now? When is he eligible for parole? 69.157.16.94 01:52, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Timing

message: I've added a "dubious tag" to the statement that he was "the first person to be tried in Canada for crimes he had committed in another country". This is almost surely not correct. A number of individuals have been tried for World War II-related crimes which were committed in Europe — see Imre Finta, for example. In a few days, I'm going to change that sentence to say he was the first prosecuted under the particular child prostitution law if no one objects here by then. Good Ol’factory (talk) 11:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious
Talk:Cops and Robbers (1973 film)

message: Hi!
I saw this film when I was still a child. Years later I became aware that I hadn't understood large parts of the plot. Can someone explain me why the mafia tried to kill the protagonists and why the mafia boss was later murdered himself by another mafioso?--80.141.193.188 (talk) 21:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Fly (Sarah Brightman album)

message: This article originally noted the video version of "How Can Heaven Love Me" for the 1996 edition. This is not the case on the 1996 editions I own. It's very possible the video version of this song was added to different editions, depending on the region/market. If your edition includes the video version of this song, then a notation should be made in the article detailing which region(s) actually include the video version.
Ucantnot (talk) 19:46, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: How Can Heaven Love Me on 1996 re-release

message: There is a link to a Thomas Schwarz as a songwriter, but the link goes to an American neuroscientist/biologist.  Probably not the right person.
86.11.96.95 (talk) 23:34, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: The Wrong Thomas Schwarz
Talk:Radboud of Utrecht

message: It's Radboud, not Radbod. For some proof, check the website of the university named after him, Radboud University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands. I will change the name of the article accordingly. --Daniel575 01:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually his contemporary name was Radbod (like in the Vita Radbodi). Later scholars misinterpreted it as Radbold/Radboud - an end suffix which means quite something different... Whether Radbod or Radboud should be used is another story; i think it 's not unrelated to whether choosing for Clovis or Chlodovech. The latter is historically correct, the first the common known name. Notum-sit (talk) 20:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Radboud
Talk:Hammond B3

message: I agree, just do it and then take down the silly merger template, it really has been up for ages, and noone (myself included) has actually done a thing about it.Don 19:25, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I play piano. How is the piano keyboard different from the Hammond. I mean, can't I just play notes they way they are on a piano? TommyBoy76 23:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:The Cup (1999 film)

message: The material in the last paragraph does not seem to relate to the film. Johnfos 05:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have deleted the extraneous paragraph now. Johnfos 08:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Slasher

message: This redirect has some edit history into it. I found 20 links in "what links here" meant for the film sub-genre and fixed them all. Also 2-3 were meant for a music band, which I also fixed. But none were meant for the agricultural machine. So althought it may be perfectly correct to say that a "slasher" is a mower, it is even more correct to consider that more users may link "slasher" to the film sub-genre in the future. That's the purpose of redirects mainly and not terminological precision. I redirect to Slash films and would appreciate if it is left there. Hoverfish Talk 19:20, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to film genre 

message: I have turned this page into a disambiguation. Considering there are a handful of articles with "Slasher" as the title or predominately in the title it's necessary. I myself was looking for information about the 2004 documentary and found it very difficult to find (I ended up having to navigate through the director's page which shouldn't have been necessary). I see there has been a sorted history for this page but I find this is the best solution. Especially since not only is a disambiguation page needed to wrangle these articles, but non of those articles themselves were on this page. Danleary25 (talk) 08:48, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Circular shift

message: The article says the number of circular shifts of a set of size n is (n − 1)!.  Using circular shifts in the sense used in the example, I think the number of circular shifts of a set of size n is n. Ray Spalding 01:31, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the statement. It does not make sense because we are not talking about sets here. --Spoon! 10:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology 

message: If we have N elements in set(register,variable,etc) 
e.g. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 
 left 2 3 4 5 6 7 1, 3 4 5 6 7 1 2, 4 5 6 7 1 2 3, 5 6 7 1 2 3 4,6 7 1 2 3 4 5,7 1 2 3 4 5 6
and right           7 1 2 3 4 5 6, 6 7 1 2 3 4 5,5 6 7 1 2 3 4, 4 5 6 7 1 2 3,3 4 5 6 7 1 2,2 3 4 5 6 7 1
Its clearly seen that Nth rotation to either side(rotation are equivalent) will become the same set.      
So the number of possible rotations is n-1               
 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.228.240.173 (talk) 10:41, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of circular shifts 

message: The article on this page refers to the same mathematical concept as Definition 1 in the article on cyclic permutation. It seems to me that usage of the term cyclic shift predominates in computer science (including theoretical computer science), whereas the term cyclic permutation is preferred by pure mathematicians (in particular algebraists). Therefore I suggest to merge the two articles.Hermel (talk) 13:26, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm against a merge, but in favour of reducing confusion. For this reason I just changed the mathematical portion of this article to be at least consistent with the meanings of "tuple" and "permutation". I also changed the example to show why it matters. As for cyclic permutation, that article only disseminates confusion, so I would prefer that it were just removed or at best reduced to a disambiguation page (I've just added a citation tag to see if all the conflicting meanings it mentions are really used like that). Any useful stuff that it might contain might be integrated (carefully) either here or in cycle or Cycles and fixed points or whatever other related article I might have overlooked. Marc van Leeuwen (talk) 10:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Either text should be added to the article explaining how the diagram relates to circular shifts, or the diagram should be replaced with something that clearly  illustrates circular shifts. It is unclear, for example, how the sequence "A051683 Triangle read by rows: a(n,k)=n!*k." is relevant, let alone the rest of the diagram. --24.47.169.50 (talk) 16:46, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram is not useful