Talk:Hutton Gibson

message: This page was removed from VfD on October 3rd because the majority wanted it kept.
* unencyclopedic -- his only claim to fame is being the father of Mel Gibson, and the article was only created in a misguided attempt to solve edit war on Mel. -- Tarquin 16:33, 27 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  From [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion|VfD]] 

message: Hutton said that there was not enough fuel to burn the bodies of the millions of Jews killed.  "It takes 20 liters to burn a body."  It takes a lot of power to burn roast beef too, but once it sets on fire more beef would just add to the flames.  Bodies do burn.  I suppose that Hutton is one of the nuts that say the whole U.S. space program is a farce produced in Hollywood. (UTC)
*No, just that the almanacs and encyclopedia's showing there were 17 million Jews worldwide before the war and 17 million after thr war prove there was no genocide. (UTC)
::I suppose you can provide us with a quote from Hutton to that effect? I mean, it would be wrong to lump every nutty statement by every nutty revisionist together, each should be evaluated on its own merits. Gzuckier 19:32, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not enough fuel to burn bodies? 

message: I removed some material that I couldn't source to the mentioned citation. Anyways, --Tom 15:10, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Local congregation support

message: Hutton Gibson has endorsed Ron Paul. -- noosphere 14:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ron Paul 

message: We have links to a blog and a Myspace page. Is that at all appropriate? Wowest (talk) 19:11, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate links 

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "FeuersteinTranscript1" :
** Partial Transcript Of The Steve Feuerstein Radio Interview With Hutton Gibson; Movie City News; March 3 2004
** empty
DumZiBoT (talk) 03:49, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 

message: Shouldn't there be some more information/focus on the fact that this man is a noted Holocaust denier??WacoJacko (talk) 08:27, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holocaust Denier 

message: Talk:David_Cole is releasing an interview with Hutton Gibson.http://www.countercontempt.com/archives/5463http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5W3Ac-UlNko  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.91.228 (talk) 01:57, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  “The Gospel of [Hutton] Gibson” (Documentary)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Hutton Gibson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929103004/http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=231187 to http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=231187
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090208223150/http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribunereview/news/westmoreland/s_511022.html to http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribunereview/news/westmoreland/s_511022.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005172237/http://www.wtae.com/r/9610978/detail.html to http://www.wtae.com/r/9610978/detail.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070128125512/http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_416937.html to http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_416937.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080128151644/http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/biography_story/16%3A580/1/Mel_Gibson.htm to http://www.thebiographychannel.co.uk/biography_story/16%3A580/1/Mel_Gibson.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080119144733/http://boards.sonypictures.com/boards/showthread.php?t=35065 to http://boards.sonypictures.com/boards/showthread.php?t=35065
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012180152/http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/2/20/125718.shtml to http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2004/2/20/125718.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100130144408/http://libertynewsradio.com/shows/tpc/2010/january/ to http://libertynewsradio.com/shows/tpc/2010/january/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070128125512/http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_416937.html to http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_416937.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100723161201/http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/westmoreland/s_511022.html to http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/westmoreland/s_511022.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I came to the article just now, wanting to read up on Mel Gibson's family. However had, the very first paragraph already casts a very
negative light on him. And this is strange, because even if these statements are true, WHY are they in the very first part? Why
not a separate subsection lateron? I reason that people who come to the page may be more interested in his whole life - not necessarily
the one that wikipedia seeks to convey and portray initially. Who wrote that page? Anyway, my gripe is not with the content per
se (I have no means to verify any of it), but with the STRUCTURE. I reason that it should not be the introduction, because as it
is, it is a very negative and biased introduction and hardly seems to be objective enough - unless you do this for EVERYONE ELSE
too. So my suggestion is to word the general introduction less biased, and if you still want to retain criticism, do so in separate
subsections lateron. As it presently is, I am being presented with information that is only marginally interesting to me on the
INITIAL first page, but whoever wrote it clearly had an agenda to WANT to convey and portray it that way, which I don't think
is appropriate for wikipedia. Wikipedia should be objective as much as possible; factual statements are great, but they should
be presented in a factual manner too, rather than suddenly become the dominating factor on a given person's webpage per se,
as the introduction. 2A02:8388:1641:8380:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 22:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you please change the wording of your request? Write something like "change x to y" instead of a general rant. --Hob Gadling (talk) 05:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality of the article 

message: was just removed. That was a weird way of putting it, so the wording itself is no big loss. But now, the word "antisemitism" is gone completely from the article. Do we have no sources on Gibson's antisemitism? Or is this anti-Judaism, its predecessor? Before the nineteenth century, repression and massacres of Jews were motivated by religion, and then antisemitism was invented - calling Jews a "race" - and replaced it as a murder motive. This whole biography seems like "antisemitism" is indeed the wrong word. He seems to have more in common with the crusaders who, on their way to Palestine, slaughtered all the Jewish "Christ killers" they found, than with the race fanatics Wagner, Chamberlain and Hitler. What do the sources say? --Hob Gadling (talk) 05:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Antisemitic act of" Holocaust denial