lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Karl Radek

message: Karl Radek does NOT belong in any "National Bolshevism" category! He was neither a stalinist nor a facist... (Removing the National Bolshevism category.)
Bronks 19 december 2005.
But of course he was a Boshevist how cooperatet with german nationalists, because they could support the nearly collapsing USSR. 84.161.118.162 18:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No to '''National Bolshevism'''

message: Should Radek be in this category. He wasn't Russian? Camillustalk 12:03, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Russian Communists

message: Radek was born in Austria - therefore ther is no need to use the Julian calendar for his birth date. Secondly, he didn't become a member of the Bolshevik party until 1917, when he came to Russia. Thirdly, he couldn't have joined the Russian Social Democratic party in 1898 since it didn't effectively exist until 1903 (despite having its founding congress in 1898 for reasons that can be read in the relevant article) and he didn't live in Russia at the time. He lived in Austrian Poland, where he did join the Polish Social Democracy in 1904) - this information is from the German National Archive (Akten der Reichskanzelei. Weimarer Republik). He participated in the 1905 revolution in Warsaw as a member of the Polish party. He moved to Germany and became a member of the SPD in 1907 and remained a member until 1913 when he was expelled. During the war he was in Switzerland working with Lenin, but not yet a member of the Russian party. He left with Lenin in the "sealed train" to become the Bolsheviks contact man in Stockholm. I'm going to change the article to fit these facts. --Mia-etol (talk) 14:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies in this article 

message: I've expanded the article quite a bit to deal with controverseries and major events Radek was involved in. However, I haven't touched the 'Schlageter speech' yet in early 1923 (see Albert Leo Schlageter), his role in relation to the rappalo treaty or his role in the Left Opposition much, particularly in relation to his role within the Comintern at that time. Also, I'm sure there is more that can be said about his time between his capitulation to Stalin in 1929 and the Moscow trials.Votemoose (talk) 12:51, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision of Article: Next Steps 

message: The article is assigned a number of categories implying that Radek was Jewish (Jewish Ukrainian politicians, Jewish socialists, etc), but there is no mention of his faith, if any, in the article. Can someone with an authoritative source please either remove the categories or update the 'Early Life' section. 101.98.88.223 (talk) 10:53, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faith? 

message: The Leftist Spartacus site implies Radek was killed by the NKVD, not a criminal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.163.188 (talk) 14:47, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other version
Talk:Fernbank Observatory

message: The altitude is an estimate base on the USGS topoquad map, which is also where I got the lat/long.  The map shows the base of the science center close to 1040ft, and by my guess the telescope (on the roof) is at least another 20+ feet above that. — Eoghanacht talk 14:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Altitude
Talk:Queen Elizabeth National Park

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Queen Elizabeth National Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091214074328/http://www.uwa.or.ug:80/queen.html to http://www.uwa.or.ug/queen.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110421042215/http://queenelizabethparks.org:80/default.aspx to http://queenelizabethparks.org/default.aspx/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 Cptmrmcmillan (talk) 00:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Performed a major overhaul of the article as part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon competition. I have re-classified the article after de-stubbing. Fsmatovu (talk) 18:53, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Major overhaul
Talk:Unsung: The Best of Helmet (1991–1997)

message: Does anyone know if Peter Mengede actually appeared on 1993's "Just Another Victim"?  Ditto for Rob Echeverria on 1996's "Disagreeable".  I attributed those tracks to them, respectively, but I don't actually know for sure.  Please correct if you know differently.  Thanks.
Lazytiger 14:42, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pyramids of the Sun and Moon

message: Is the "El Castillo" pyramid in Yucatán also called the Pyramid of the Sun? If so, we need a disambiguation here.
I never heard of the Sun pyramid in Teotihuacán being called by that name. The link that was placed in this article is in any case  misleading, and I will revert the link. (Second thoughts: I commented out the whole reference. If somebody can show it to be relevant, it is there to be uncommented back in.)
--Lavintzin 15:04, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert El Castillo?
Talk:Balakh Sher Mazari

message: jeeway   sardar mir balakh sher mazari mir sahib jesa sardar kaha hai
tuman mazarii shaan aastein Mir sahib...sakhii aastein....maeh kullah dua theii phajeeyah sein.
Uses material from http://www.oicun.org/21th%20icfm%20final%20communoque.html Rodney Boyd 18:40, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old post

message: I have copy-edited this article for spelling & grammar, and have removed the copy-edit tag. However I have out the cleanup tag, because the information is all over the place and the flow of the article is pretty bad. JenLouise 00:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of Tags 
Talk:WWE Armageddon

message: Yeah, I don't know how to reference or whatever, or if this is enough, although it should be, but here's the match between Yang and Helms from Armageddon 2006, and as you can see it ends with Helms hitting the Double Knee Facebreaker. http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/Helms+Yang/video/x2vrhv_jimmy-wang-yang-vs-gregory-helms-cr_extreme  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.196.49.23 (talk) 04:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes he did hit that move, but then he pinned Yang with a roll-up. So he won with the roll-up. TJ Spyke 04:49, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He hit his move, but then used a roll-up yo win. Simple as that. We use the move they did to get the win. If he had gone for a regular pinfall attempt, then maybe. TJ Spyke 04:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finish of Helms/Yang 

message: Wikipedia should start an article on Armageddon 2006  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.4.198.244 (talk) 00:55, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out WP:PW. We only have so many volunteers, so it will take time to get them all. TJ Spyke 00:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armageddon 2006 
Talk:Hamer Guitars

message: Does anyone know whether the indonesian or korean hamers are better quality? thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.135.69.188 (talk) 04:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Asia

message: ... because right now that accusation isn't true. Maikel (talk) 20:23, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've removed the "This article is written like an advert tag" ... 

message: How is Hamer pronounced... like "hay-mer" or like "hammer" ?
Paul pronounced it "hay-mer."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leica0000 (talk • contribs) 18:10, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation?

message: I've noticed that Hello Misic is offering Hamer guitars as of May 29th, 
https://www.hellomusic.com/items/satq-hb
Does anyone know who or where they are at? I don't know who KMC Music is.........
http://www.hamerguitars.com/
Mike Hays  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.34.63.72 (talk) 23:23, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamer guitars are still for sale........ 

message: And maybe push the airheads back a bit as well. I'd be amused at all the empty conjecture if this wasn't supposed to be an autoritative site -- no, on second thought, it'd still be irritating.
Here's a page entitled New 2017 Hamer Guitar Models: http://www.hamerguitars.com/2017/ -- maybe they have some informed idea. Now, if some fanboy would like to trace the history of the brand from its 2013 death-by-Fender up to the here-&-now -- maybe even learning how to use archive.org -- that'd be cool.  Weeb Dingle (talk) 04:02, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: overdue for overhaul
Talk:Aldo Andretti

message: There is a reference to "his brother Mark" in the Adam Andretti article, but no mention of him here in Aldo's (or John's, for that matter).  He is not involved in racing, but has been mentioned occasionally on John's fan page.  Unable to find his date of birth to add him in correct birth order in this article, so have not done so.Gofinsc (talk) 16:53, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aldo Andretti's children 
Talk:Lawyers in Poland

message: I introduced several minor  amendments to the page. I replaced "Ph.D." with a little more proper "J.D." [Juris Doctor, as equivalent for Polish "doktor nauk prawnych"]. I also mentioned, that since mid-2005 legal counsels may represent their customers in almost every cases, except criminal ones (I don't want to bother anyone with details about differences between purely criminal and criminal-fiscal proceedings)MWeinz 15:24, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Kafue National Park

message: I would assume this means "mammals"???--GRM 20:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "animals" 

message: An article is needed on the Nkoya people and I suggest their proposed Kafue Province be dealt with there -- it's shouldn't really be here in this article on the National Park. Rexparry sydney 09:54, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nkoya people
Talk:Tibás

message: should this be deleted as non-notable?? asks Madman2001 in his edit summary. Absolutely not. There are literally thousands of small less notable places with articles in the states and this is an international encyclopedia. There are also countless places in the UK etc which are much smaller buit have articles,. The general feeling is place articles are fine on places much smaller than this, eg see Totnes. Suggesting that because it is a Latin American place it is less notable would be true for a US centred wikipedia but never for an international encyclopedia like the one we have, SqueakBox 15:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Tower (Code Lyoko)

message: This may have been imagined, or posably because of different angles or something, but towers seem to have a lighter and more brilient blue when Aelita is useing them. This would make some sense, seing as her father has a white glow... --Kinkoblast 15:34, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aelita/Normal tower glow? 

message: In many episodes, Jeremy mentions Way Towers, but they look the same as normal towers. How can the gang (except Jeremy) tell the differance?
:Location, location, location. Always wanted to say that. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 20:09, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe there are way towers and standard towers, and maybe a tower between Carthage and another sector judging from the contents of this article Wiki Fox 21:35, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different Towers???
Talk:How High the Moon

message: Naturally if you think that music all started 1950 and mostly consists of country and western' tunes played on a badly tuned guitar and sung by a feminine soprano with a vibrato that could sink an ocean liner. 
Also referring to the axiom that the best music is the best selling music and not the best music —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.216.136.35 (talk) 09:37, 19 December 2005
:i agree that the article for this song, that is one of the most famous jazz standards was somehow written by a massive c&w fan, and so many of us had only heard ellas interpretation!Gareth E Kegg 22:57, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It sure seems strange to call the C/W recording "best known", and with no attribution.  It reads very POV.  I am removing it.  Zaslav (talk) 19:46, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Country & Western bias

message: "Solar" is not based on part of the progression. Solar is a variation on a 12-tone blues progression. The fact that one or
two II-V-I are shared between the tunes does not mean one is based on the other. That bit should be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.125.178.36 (talk) 02:09, 21 April 2007
:I would be very interested to hear a "12-tone blues progression" someday. InnocuousPseudonym 21:15, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it is cited it should stay (WP:CITE). If you have encountered a source which disagrees please describe what that source says and cite it as well. Hyacinth (talk) 22:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Solar"

message: My 10" 78 rpm copy of How High the Moon? (Lewis, Hamilton) by Les Paul & Mary Ford b/w What Is This Thing Called Love? (Cole Porter) by Les Paul is a UK release, Capitol CL 13505. This was before Capitol's association with EMI, and was distributed by Decca. Matrix numbers are CAP 6958-N1 and CAP 3269-1D-8. Should this be listed? --Redrose64 (talk) 11:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK release 

message: I'm not sure the 'Other versions' section follows WP:COVERSONG...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamilo (talk • contribs) 01:37, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Other versions
Talk:Etosha National Park

message: The climate data simply cannot be correct. The highest temperatures of the table are in winter, the lowest ones in summer. Someone please check on this. --Revilovs (talk) 09:45, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Climate
Talk:Ford Explorer Sport Trac

message: I'll refrain from reverting the improperly done move at this point, but if the name is actually just "Ford Sport Trac" now, there needs to be a reliable source. I checked Ford's website and there weren't any good closeups of the tailgate but it looked like "Explorer" was still on the emblem. --Sable232 (talk) 22:22, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no source or even so much as an explanation was provided, the changes have been reverted. --Sable232 (talk) 21:49, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: changed to sport utility instead of pickup truck cause its not a pickup truck. there is no sorcing that proves that it is  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.202.169 (talk) 12:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And there is no sourcing to prove it isn't, either. It is a pickup truck according to Wikipedia's definition. It is not up to us to find sources to disprove your POV. --Sable232 (talk) 22:20, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper Definition 

message: Well in the middle of 2002 Ford removed the Explorer badges from the side of the door along with a few other changes ICarly98 (talk) 14:22, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Category talk:LGBT organizations

message: why is nambla listed in LGBT organizations? the focus of their organiztion is pedophilia, not LGBT rights or advocacy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.235.54.44 (talk • contribs) 15:56, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.   What exactly is the point of creating a seperate "gay organizations" category, and how is this any different from an LGBT organization?  Seems like just a clumsy inappropriate way of trying to find some compromise between those who want NAMBLA in the LGBT category and those who don't. --Xyzzyplugh 05:04, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

text: The Gay organizations category was created as the result of official moderation regarding the classification of NAMBLA.  It was decided that since NAMBLA does not expressly involve the entirety of the lesbian, gay and transgendered community a subcategory was deserved.  Accordingly, I have removed organizations that I could not determine to expressly include the transgendered community to the subcategory :Category:Lesbian and Gay organizations.  Where available, I checked the organization's home pages, and have moved those that do not mention transgender in their own organizational descriptions or mission statements.  I think that the "nambla rule" is a poor precedent, but it should be applied to all organizations in this category so long as it exists. Tomyumgoong 23:07, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The tail is wagging the dog. - Jmabel | Talk 05:33, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: nambla & subcategories
Template talk:Medcab1

message:  → 
 → 
* 19 12 2005 text
→AzaToth 16:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I think the date syntax is a bit nonstandard, reccoment to change it to:
* --, 
→AzaToth 20:15, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date syntax
Talk:Siobhán Coady

message: Why was this article stripped of content and redirected (redirect from an article without content virtually same as deletion) when it had already passed the muster on another AfD on Dec 14, 2005 (see AfD above)? The article was subsequently noted as keep per discussion here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siobhán Coady! --HJKeats (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect and content removed 

message: I don't know if editors have a hard time properly understanding wikipedia policy or just think that it's a source for promoting someone they work with, but the nonsense has to stop. It has been explained many times that adding large amounts of unsourced info, most of which is so irrelevant to wikipedia that it doesn't belong to begin with, is not how to properly edit articles. Also, continuing to change section titles to all capitals is violating WP:Headings, and is starting to look more like unconstructive behaviour than a good faith edit by an editor who doesn't know the policy. Once or twice is ok, but over and over again is getting to be a bit much. If you're going to add relevant info to the article, than go ahead and do it, just properly source the edits, but if you're only going to add info taking about what a great person the subject is, and what a great job she is doing, than it's only going to be reverted, because your point-of-view doesn't belong in wikipedia articles. Why is it so hard to understand why statements like "What’s most impressive about Coady is how seriously she takes the business of Parliament and her job as a Parliamentarian. She is tough without being hysterical, forceful without being blustery." are not the type of statements you add to articles? Cmr08 (talk) 02:31, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to reinforce that for User:Clownheadisnotthename (now blocked and editing from an IP address) - you will not succeed in turning this article into a sycophantic fan-page, with your ridiculous idea of what constitutes references. People have this article on their watchlists and we will revert your changes, and if you persist then the only thing you will achieve is to get the article protected. (I'm adding this here as you keep changing IP address). -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:58, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuous addition of unsourced information, and policy violations
Talk:Franz Eugen Schlachter

message: There's a full article at the German Wikipedia if anyone feels like translating it. --Last Malthusian 16:24, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kung hei fat choi/Move Discussion

message: *Support: as above — Yaohua2000 07:01, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Votes 

message: There is clearly not a consensus to move the article here, and the five days have elapsed, so I've unlisted this from WP:RM. I will note that Wikipedia:Manual of Style (China-related articles) has some guidance, and I will also note that there is absolutely nothing wrong with listing variants on the phrase in brackets at the start of the article. --bainer (talk) 08:38, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Result
Talk:Propheteering

message: This article is crap  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.114.147.215 (talk) 22:34, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

message: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Propheteering. Johnleemk | Talk 16:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed AFD

message: I did some major cleanup on the article. Most of it was just tidying up the English and making things flow better. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 09:52, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also pared down the links list. Ben, if you want to claim that these are "references" then point out where what was said in the article was referenced from. I just see a bunch of articles accusing others of propheteering, which is fine, but we don't need so many of them. --Woohookitty(cat scratches) 10:01, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 23:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-8 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Earle Nelson

message: Added reference after the fact. Needs close fact check.--FloNight 16:37, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The info box says: "Cause of death: hanging. Penalty: Death." Having the information organized in this manner makes it seem like the penalty for his being hanged is death - which is obviously absurd (although I suppose one might see a penalty as a sort of result, thus death is the result of hanging). It needs to go in this order: Crime, Penalty, Cause of death. That's the only order that makes sense. Fuzzform (talk) 01:49, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs to be fact checked

message: Lola Cowan or Lola Cowen? -Yupik (talk) 10:09, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Last name
Talk:Magnus Manske

message: The notability of the person, Magnus Manske, is only due to the notability of MediaWiki. The only notable thing we can say about him is in one sentence - he coded the first version of MediaWiki. It doesn't seem this article will be expanded unless he comes and write about his own life, a practice that is frowned upon. There are many precedents here of redirecting the founder of an organization to the organization's article.--Jiang 00:46, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly concur with Jiang. We simply do not have the sources to write a biography of Manske. He's a great contributor, and everyone loves MediaWiki but he's not a public person. I hope that we can avoid having a needlessly divisive afd debate on par with those of Erik and Angela. Before recreating this article, please provide a handful of published sources on this talk page demonstrating that there are sufficient biographical facts for this article. As the sourcing standards for biographies of living persons have increased dramatically since January 2006 (and certainly since the 2005 afd), I believe that the burden rests with those who oppose the merger to provide some sources here for scrutiny first. Savidan 19:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree with this redirect. I was confused as to why I got redirected to MediaWiki, and though you can find a sentence about him on the page there are also mentions of him on several other pages, such as history of Wikipedia and history of wikis. Why not just delete the page and let people view all of the search results (which basically act as an index entry) rather than sending them to one specific page. Richard001 (talk) 02:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Several new sources and books have been written in the interim, and several reference Magnus' role; I've rewritten the article, based on a German version but extended it somewhat with references. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 20:14, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version 

message: Why is there no section "criticism"? Currently the article looks like advertisement for Magnus Manske. 78.55.189.119 (talk) 05:10, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no clear reason to include add a criticism section, and as far as I can tell, there are no notable controversies involving Manske. If you think the language violates WP:NPOV, that's one thing (though personally, I don't see that). Otherwise, criticism sections should generally be avoided (see WP:CRITS). Gmarmstrong (talk) 17:53, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism