Talk:Tavleen Singh

message: :Image:Kashmir tavleen singh1246.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Kashmir tavleen singh1246.jpg

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: , Can you explain correctly why you have deleted the whole Personal Life section here. I agree the framing wasn't correct and there may be some original researches, but the fact that the subject had Salman Taseer as a partner and Aatish Taseer is their son is reliably sourced and widely published as can be seen in these sources , , , apart from the two sources in the section. It doesn't violate WP:BLPPRIVACY. We can frame it as "Singh has a son, Aatish taseer, with Pakistani politician Salman Taseer". Keeping it simple without any unneeded crap. I believe we should reinstate that. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:46, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You can reinstate that. I deleted it because it contained too much peacocky and something contentious language which can affect BLP.— Harshil want to talk? 13:01, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:05, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent deletion of Personal life section 

message: , would you expand on your views on having a 'Views' section which would detail Tavleen Singh's views on important personalities and events. The personalities could and must include Narendra Modi, Sonia Gandhi, Amit Shah, Manmohan Singh.
I am sure those views can be sourced and citations found for them. Sachi Mohanty 19:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Views section 

message: , here is a relevant section from Paul Krugman's Wikipedia page.
Paul_Krugman#Political_views Sachi Mohanty 19:44, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Thoughts on Capturing Views of Opinion Columnists 

message: , here's Thomas Friedman on various issues Thomas_Friedman#Views_and_opinions
We can have something similiar on Tavleen Singh's page. Sachi Mohanty 19:48, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Policy Opinions of Columnists 

message: , we can document Tavleen Singh's views on economics on her page. Sachi Mohanty 19:54, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tavleen Singh's Economic Views