lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Great Hunt

message: Meaning no offense, but does anyone really care?  In the grand scheme of things, it's a very minor part of the overall series.  It doesn't seem worth it to have this taking up space in Wikipedia.  I propose that this subplot be removed from the TGH entry.  --BPMoldovan 03:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thom and Dena 

message: he becomes a darkfriend doesn't he?  Shouldn't that be mentioned in the climax? especially because he redeems himself in the end. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.106.236.19 (talk) 04:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ingtar 

message: I am on this book but i think its just as good as the Belgariad.  All hail Wheel of Time!!!!!!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GolemBug (talk • contribs) 20:43, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I love this series 

message: The summary needs to be more compact and concise. It isn't only too big, but strangly worded and too detailed as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.126.146.134 (talk) 20:52, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The summary isn't summarized well enough.
Talk:196 problem

message: Is there anything here which isn't already covered (or could be covered just as well) in the Lychrel number article?  Perhaps 196 problem should just be a redirect to Lychrel number? Chuck 15:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I see we had the same idea at the same time. :) Chuck 15:15, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Surfacing (novel)

message: Is it just me, or is this entry in need of an edit/re-write, particularly the first two paragraphs? --Doclit (talk) 17:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit? 

message: Very good discussion. What are the sources used for it  after the first few subsections Or is it perhaps OR, or even copyvio?~
Thanks for complimenting the discussion piece. The long analysis has now been removed (not by me). For info, it was not a copyright violation but it was original research - an undergraduate essay I wrote when I was studying Atwood some years ago. In terms of the quality of the article it's a a shame it's gone really, but as original research it was outside of Wikipedia's remit, so it was right that it should go. Mrsyetidooscreecher (talk) 22:12, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Themes

message: *Clearing a Canadian Space - NY Times
*Books: Out of the Woods - Times Magazine
*After nature - The Guardian
*WOMAN AS EVERYMAN IN ATWOOD'S SURFACING: SOME OBSERVATIONS ON THE END OF THE NOVEL - Can Lit
*You are what you eat: the politics of eating in the novels of Margaret Atwood - bNet
*FORM IN ATWOOD'S SURFACING: TOWARD A SYNTHESIS OF CRITICAL OPINION - Can Lit
*A FOOTNOTE ON SURFACING - Can Lit
*Re-Figuring Imperialism
* Colonialism in Margaret Atwood's 'Surfacing'
*The Cambridge companion to Margaret Atwood
*The novel: language and narrative from Cervantes to Calvino
*Margaret Atwood: vision and forms
*Literary Theory: The Basics
--Kweeket  Talk 20:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of potential sources
Talk:AP Biology

message: This article needs a lot of work.  The exam topic list leaves off too many of the subjects of AP Bio, while listing embryology, which is a tangential topic at best.--dilettante 18:06, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I made a few changes, clarifying the format of the writing portion, updating the first listed link to be a bit more user friendly, and adding the 2006 score distribution results. --Silver2Falcon 22:28, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates... 

message: Where do the page's 2008 grade distributions come from? I can't find them in the references and as far as I know they are not posted on the collegeboard website.Fusionshrimp (talk) 19:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grade distributions 

message: There are critics of the AP program that believe that the high school science curriculum does not adequately prepare students with a background college-level scientific studies and that students who have studied AP Biology do not perform as well in college science classes as might be expected of someone who successfully completed an AP course in the subject matter.[3]
I'm not sure what this sentence is trying to say. Could someone please clarify? Thanks Prosecretin (talk) 04:19, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The course 
Talk:Dragon Ball: The Magic Begins

message: This article is actually in WikiProject China, because, besides the Taiwanese production, the ultimate basis of this is from the Chinese legend of Sun Wukong.  The rest of the Dragon Ball articles are either in the WikiProject Anime and manga or WikiProject Japan.  --Geopgeop 05:11, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject China

message: I remember seeing something about another unauthorized Chinese/Hong Kong Dragon Ball live-action movie on Toon Zone and Daizenshuu EX. I remember I thonk Veemonjosh from Toon ZOne had a avatar of a plush-like Puar smoking a cigarette.--JFP 23:39, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't there another unauthorized Chinese/Hong Kong Dragon Ball live-action movie? 

message: The chinese name for the dragon balls in the anime is 龙珠, which translate to dragon pearls in english. Ragnaroknike (talk) 05:15, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dragon pearl or ball? 
Talk:Louis Andriessen

message: It seems like a list this long should be moved to another page List of Compositions by Louis Andriessen. That seems to be the norm in the composers articles I've seen. Thoughts? -- MarkBuckles 07:29, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Works List

message: This is a useful article which I believe needs only a little work to bring it to B class. Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Appropriate infobox should be added 
*Photograph should be added from a source with a free license 
*Some biographical information required, including dates for education, and positions held
*Lead needs expanding and should emphasise reasons for notability of subject
*Article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*Information on works should be expanded, and in particular critical reception needs addressing
*Works list is long and could be moved to a separate article; it might also be clearer divided into sections by instrument
*References should be expanded and preferably converted to inline format
*External links present which could be used to expand article
Espresso Addict 09:31, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments

message: I think there's something that is not clear about Andriessen's wife:
Andriessen is married to Jeanette Yanikian, a guitarist (1935-2008). They have been a couple for over 
40 years, and have been married since 1996.[1]''
Next to the name there is a birth and death date, but the next sentence is in the present tense. Which one of the true is correct? The person who wrote the date may as well have meant that the guitarist is still alive (and instead of writing "1935-" they wrote "1935-2008" in ignorance).
Jujimufu (talk) 22:05, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andriessen's wife 

message: Hello, I have just added the sad news that Andriessen is suffering from dementia.  I placed it under 'Personal Life". Thelisteninghand (talk) 20:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illness
Talk:Icelandic funeral

message: It might be better just to post the four individual pics, and then they can be spread throughout the article with Wikiformatting.--DCAnderson 15:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pic 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Balfor:Stub. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 14#Balfor:Stub until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Vahurzpu (talk) 15:03, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Balfor:Stub" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Maria Weston Chapman

message: This is a highly suspect article on a well-known figure of the antislavery movement, apparently copied from a source with a great deal of animus towards Maria Weston Chapman. While the historical basics appear correct, the overlay of dislike and ironic comment is not necessary. Jlockard 15:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Two copyright issues might need attention here, though I haven't reviewed the article's provenance and edit history closely enough to be sure.  First: This anonymous edit claims that the article is "excerpted" from an unpublished dissertation.  This anonymous editor did nothing else to the article, and the claim is entirely unsubstantiated, so I see no reason to credit it.  Second: this article is apparently quite closely adapted from the ANB article on Chapman.  I haven't checked carefully, but there appears to be little overlap of actual prose -- still, there are a few direct quotations and a lot of overlap of interpretation and synthesis.  This might need attention as almost-but-not-quite plagiarism. -- Rbellin|Talk 14:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References and sources
Talk:Brian Connor (pastor)

message: I removed the deletion tag as the person who posted left this message attached to it.
"Reads like a combonation advertisement/promotional for a non-notable televangelist, or something..." First off it says nothing in the article that he is or was a televangelist. Secondly, I am a Catholic and am not a Baptist and am not advertising for this person, frankly the hint that I am is annoying. He is a leading authority in his field when all these news programs want to feature him and his ministry on their programs the three main networks, ABC, NBC and CBS have all either invited him on a show or have had him on. I saw one of these programs and thought the person interesting, credible and noteworthy. He has been on the radio, featured in magazines and like I said above seen on both network and cable television. Just because the guy doesn't promote himself on the internet and get a million hits on google does not mean he is non-notable. By all means improve upon the article don't just erase it after five days if no-one is paying attention. Dwain 15:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion?
Talk:Victory Auto Wreckers

message: Goethean - why do you keep putting copyright violation on this page?  quotes are attributed to their authors.  Some of the information was used from a Chicago Sun Times article from 2/14/2005 that this link uses, but it is not word -for -word.  please explain.  thanks and best regards. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.107.122.15 (talk • contribs) 
:You have changed a few phrases, but not enough to make it copyright-free. Please see WP:CP. If you do not stop removing the copyvio notice, you can be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — goethean ॐ 16:18, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone have a transcipt of the current commercial? Apparently, they've changed the "you'll get cash on the spot" line.  I haven't seen the commercial on TV for a while now, so if anyone can help me, just post a message here or on my talk page.  Thanks! Zagalejo 19:50, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I just saw the commercial on WGN, and the cash line is still there. Zagalejo 06:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No more "cash line"?
Talk:Chase Line

message: Dates of re-opening - I'm sure the section North of Hednesford was later than 1989. The article Goose quotes states 1989 for Walsall to Hednesford, not Hednesford to Rugeley TV. I've put 1998 back for this latter section, with a request for citation.  --Tivedshambo 15:53, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Errrmmm... it's got a railway station that used to be called Great Barr and is also served by the number 16 bus. I can't think of anything else to say about Hamstead. Is it really notable enough? 82.36.26.229 22:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Why is this listed under "places served" by the line, when it hasn't been served for more than 40 years? 86.136.249.128 04:52, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Wyrley 

message: There is a station (not open) shown on the map as "Wryley and Cheslyn Hay" - it should be "Wyrley and Cheslyn Hay". I cannot see a way to amend this.EmleyMoor (talk) 09:51, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed - see Template:Chase Line. – Tivedshambo (talk) 07:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling problem on map 

message: @86.19.222.221 @JamesVilla44 to stop any kind of edit war breaking out, I suggest we discuss this here - as per WP:BRD. Let's hope the IP actually engages this time, as they have a history of ignoring talk pages. Danners430 (talk) 07:28, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Region edit warring
Talk:Joshna Chinappa

message: Instead of thanking the Academy she ungreatfully said that they had never coached her, a fact which is false and can be checked by reading any of the back issues of the Hindi newspaper online.'
anirudh 15:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this be rewarded?
Talk:Arturo Rodríguez Fernández

message: I have removed some non-NPV lines. - some of them could perhaps be added back in, if there are references to back them up.
Also, please can someone add in which newspaper he writes for?
--Ladybirdintheuk 15:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pennsylvania State Constables

message: Once again, there seems to be vandalism occuring on this page.  Rather than simply "restoring" the page to stub status, please add information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanley1029 (talk • contribs) 04:55, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Looking over the article, there is still a lot of unsourced material.  I've tried to fill it out in the past, but the number of edits performed on this page has proven to be too much for just one person.  As you edit, remember to cite. User:Hanley1029:User talk:Hanley1029   —Preceding undated comment added 02:57, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: Shouldn't this be "Pennsylvania State Constable" ? The articel text and website names seem to refer to them as "State Constables" and not "State Constable Officers". 68.39.174.238 (talk) 20:50, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Article contains a large section of solely negative criticism. ninety:one 00:24, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I have removed all unsourced material. The latest IP has only removed sourced material, with non-existent or misleading edit summaries. Anything else added will need to be referenced due to the now-contentious nature of this article. ninety:one 22:18, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is such a mess 
Talk:Melinda Halliwell

message: The references listed to support the claims of this article violate the rules of Wikipedia. Under the article Wikipedia:reliable sources it is stated "Posts to bulletin boards, Usenet, and wikis, or comments on blogs, should not be used as sources. This is in part because we have no way of knowing who has written or posted them, and in part because there is no editorial oversight or third-party fact-checking." Both references link to other Wikipedia articles and therefore cannot be considered reliable sources. Please cite reliable sources to support your claims or they will be flagged for deletion. [User:Adrienne] 22 February 2007
:That sentence is a bit of a misnomer, as this refers to outside wikis that have no oversight or are edited by only a handful of users.  This is the same as with WP:EL, the external link guideline.  Wikipedia articles are fine to use as long as they themselves cite their sources; in this case, the episode itself is the source, which is what the reference is actually referring to.  Many many articles here on wikipedia use this similar format, and there is even a  template which would basically do the same thing.  Providing a wikilink simply allows for additional information to be obtained on the episode. -- Huntster T • @ • C 11:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: It has been dicussed for months, and no one can defend why this charector should have her own article. This entire article is a repeat of what is listed on the Family and Friends page, or is fanon Nowhere in the show or script does it say That Melinda has 2 daighters. The Book of Three is a FAN compolation and can not be used as a reference. PLEASE DISCUSS here before trying to reinstate this unecessary article.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.209.30.215 (talk) 25 July 2007
*Redirected and fixed double redirects. Ratiocinate (t • c) 17:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: final note on deletion
Talk:Chandra Cheeseborough

message: I remvoed this comment because I'm not sure it is germane:
:Earlier that year, the Jacksonville native had attended a summer track program at Tennessee State University and benefited from the tutelage of Hall of Fame coach Ed Temple. 
RJFJR 16:01, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems like her name is now Chandra Cheeseborough-Guice.
http://www.tsutigers.com/athletics/staff/5775/chandra-cheeseborough-guice/
Can I change the article to reflect that? Ccheever (talk) 04:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last name change
Talk:Adelaide University Lacrosse Club

message: This page was listed for deletion. I disagree with this assumption. Although the article may not be perfect it does fit in with some of the core values of Wikipedia. 
"Articles need not be polished" 
If you disagree on this issue please help with my Wiki education and provide me with reasons.
Thanks
Ozdaren 16:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged for Deletion
Talk:Fates Warning

message: What makes them so different from the scorpions or any other hair band? I definatly don't hear it. I'm sorry Dream Theater and this are not the same genre.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.5.29.31 (talk) 22:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry but I can find references to prove that you are wrong. All music Guide states that they are progressive metal  and people know for a fact that they are as well. What makes them so different from "hair" metal bands is that they actually are different. --CircafuciX (talk) 02:05, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Who said it was Dream Theater that defined the genre progressive metal?  Although I'm still a huge Theater fan, not every other prog metal band has to sound like them.  Both bands take traits used in prog rock such as complexity, long songs, and odd time signatures and combine that with elements of metal.  Sounding like Dream Theater is not the definition of the genre.  Repner1 (talk) 17:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Rage had a lot of progressive elements, but I can see the argument that it might not have truly been there yet. O:M, Perfect Symmetry, and When Dream and Day Unite really made progressive metal "a thing" IMO. And to address the main point, Fates are clearly progressive. Maybe s/he only heard selected songs from the 80s that didn't show this very well. MXVN (talk) 17:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progressive Metal!? 
Talk:Norman Maurer

message: Anyone know for sure whether the date for The Three Stooges Scrapbook is 1960 or 1963? A quick Google indicates that IMDB and most other sources say 1963... the 1960 dates seem to be more on message boards, though IMDB has been known to be wrong. Anyone have any definitive proof of one date or the other? If not, I suggest we follow IMDB. -- Rizzleboffin 16:05, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Three Stooges Scrapbook
Talk:ISU Grand Prix of Figure Skating

message: This section could be helped out by providing sources:
:Fall international competitions such as Skate America, organized by the skating federations of their host countries, had been held for many years prior to their organization into a series. Following the Nancy Kerrigan attack in 1994, television coverage of skating was saturated with made-for-TV professional skating events, while the traditional "amateur" or "eligible" competitions were neglected. In order to remedy this situation, in 1995, the federations from the United States, Canada, Germany, France, and Japan began to plan their events as a series with cooperative marketing of the television rights in those countries, and prize money funded by the sale of those rights. At this point, the International Skating Union stepped in and asserted its ownership of the international television rights to the series.
thanks —Pelladon 21:17, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Beverly Smith's book, A Year in Figure Skating -- that year being 1995-96, so she goes into quite a bit of detail about how the then brand-new Champions Series came about.  Dr.frog 23:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rostelecom Cup

message: Are those entrants for 2006? --Fang Aili talk 21:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Kolindigo 21:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Entrants

message: Cup of Russia officially renamed to ROSTELECOM CUP, as the current sponsor is Rostelecom. () -- deerstop. 16:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting news. :) I'd wait off on a page move and correcting wikilinks for the 2009-2010 season until the Grand Prix announcement comes out, though. The latest ISU Communication still has "Cup of Russia"  Kolindigo (talk) 03:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: * Agree, better wait and double-check :) -- deerstop. 13:18, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The annoucement . So I guess the question is now: is this a one-time thing or is the event going to be renamed this for many years? If this is just a one time event and the 2010 event will be the 2010 Cup of Russia, then I'm not sure we should rename this article. Cup of Russia is the most common name for this competition and the article can simply note that the 2009 event was called the Rostelecom Cup. The 2009 article will be the 2009 Rostelecom Cup since that will be the name, but I'm not sure if Cup of Russia should be renamed. Thoughts? Kolindigo (talk) 05:27, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Rian.ru states "for one year". -- deerstop. 06:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cup of Russia -> Rostelecom Cup
Talk:Paula Yates

message: Does heroin have a correct dose? Grassynoel (talk) 09:41, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overdose 
Talk:Roland SC-55

message: Created Sc-55 and Sound canvas as redirects to this page. Roland Sound Canvas already existed. --HunterZ 16:10, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects 

message: The Roland CM-300 and Roland CM-500  (?Roland SC-155?), are to my knowlehede based on the SC-55MkII and include the extended voices.
Can sombody that knows more abaut the Souncanvas series check this? 95.88.250.251 (talk) 07:51, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CM-300 = SC-55 or SC-55MkII? 

message: The SC-55 had some really low quality cheap-MIDI sounding voices. What do you think?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.8.63.115 (talk) 16:55, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low quality sounds 

message: A lot of SCC-1-specific information (variants and their patch differences, hardware connections, links to demo songs, etc.) are missing after the merge operation. Why can't Wikipedia serve as a source for technical details in addition to the common information that is available anywhere? --TamaMan (talk) 09:49, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The old SCC-1 article had a lot of useless information and info that isn't specific to the SC-55/SCC-1. - Master Bigode (Talk) (Contribs) 20:41, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post merge information 

message: Are they? They're all random kid's TV shows. --2A00:23C7:6587:6101:E9EF:2224:3F94:715C (talk) 11:12, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Users
Template talk:History of Vojvodina

message: Estavisti, your changes caused that table drag text in the articles where it was placed, so I reverted to previous version. PANONIAN (talk) 16:12, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Something is wrong with this template. Last event which it show is Banat Republic but there are more events in this template which template do not show. Why is that? Can somebody repair this error? CrnoBelo (talk) 13:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed. Frietjes (talk) 14:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Error