lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Love handles

message: I have packed on some 25 lbs over the last year and a half and I decided to volunteer a photo of my "love handles" to this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.12.173 (talk) 16:46, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Picture needs to reflect handles part more directly, the arms cover the sides blocking the view of the handles on the left and right sides. I'd just rotate 90° and resubmit. 206.248.128.31 (talk) 22:14, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Volunteer

message: Cumulus Clouds wanted to merge this article to Central obesity, whereas I feel the phrase deserves its own article.  I've added this section to the talk page to prompt a discussion. --  JediLofty User ¦ Talk 12:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: Muffin top is another slang term for the same thing (apparent abdominal obesity).  Since it is less common/more recent term, should be merged into this article. Zodon (talk) 07:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: While a muffin top is apparently the result of love handles, it is a condition brought on by certain garments, and I believe the sources use this term to describe females, though I could be wrong. It's my opinion that muffin top should continue to be its own article because you cannot use the terms interchangeably; eg one cannot have a muffin top if they are nude. Boy, my comment really is becoming quite disturbing. I'll stop now. :)  Law shoot! 17:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They are both terms describing large ammounts of abdominal fat.  It is questionable whether they even belong in WikiPedia (probably more apropos of Wiktionary), but since both are about essentially the same topic (terms describing ...) there is no reason for separate articles in an encyclopedia.  Zodon (talk) 00:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge muffin top
Talk:Arlington Park

message: I am removing the entire living quarters section of this article.  It borders on libel.  There is not one citation in the entire section.  I have heard about the poor living conditions, but you are going to have to provide citations, and use non biased language.Taxmandante (talk) 15:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Living Quarters 

message: Something is missing or wrong in this sentence: "Yet it was announced that the Arlington Million would be ith the future of Arlington in doubt after the fire, the meet was shifted to Hawthorne racetrack and it was announced that the Arlington Million would be held at Arlington on August 25, 1985 by using temporary bleachers." Kdammers 12:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense 

message: This article needs to have a new name, to reflect the new name of the racecourse.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoosiercubsfan89 (talk • contribs) 20:36, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: I am updating aspects of the page but am a novice at editing and am not sure how to add the new globe logo vs. the outdated script. AfleetAlexsBalance (talk) 15:52, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo Change 

message: So, about the sale to the Bears... I don't think it should be listed that the Bears own the property. For one... they don't. There is an AGREEMENT to buy the property, but the deal is not closed. Also, looking at the future, if/when the Bears build a new stadium on the property, it will most certainly have a new article. At that point, we would never look back in time and say that "The Bears owned Arlington Park at the end." My opinion... Arlington Park, owned by Churchill Downs, is Closed. The future is yet to be determined, so we can reference the planned sale in the article, but the Sidebar content should just be Closed/Churchill Downs. —Fumo7887 (talk • contribs) 22:05, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sale of Property to Chicago Bears
Talk:Microsoft Intermediate Language

message: Merge D. Wo. 18:40, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "During the development of .NET, the official term for IL [Intermediate Language] was Microsoft intermediate language (MSIL). However with the final release of .NET, the term was changed to common intermediate language (CIL). Thus, as you read the .NET literature, understand that IL, MSIL, and CIL are all describing the same exact entity. In keeping with the current terminology, I will use the abbreviation 'CIL' throughout this text."
Unless you want to say that Microsoft is being completely duplicitous here (unfortunately not such an absurd notion) I don't see how there can be any more discussion on the issue. Microsoft doesn't distinguish between CIL and MSIL, and neither should Wikipedia. SanchoPanza 14:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: Promoters tout its potential to accomplish platform independence and runtime safety, but as of 2003 it only works on MS Windows. Has there been a change since then? Any GNU or Macintosh, for example? --Uncle Ed 19:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See Mono Project. Tulkolahten 21:20, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Even with Mono and Rotor proving that MSIL 'could' run on non-Windows, the fact that Microsoft hasn't pushed to make it run on other OS's doesn't bother a lot of people in view of what MSIL and .NET did accomplish--making all 36+ versions of Windows alike to a programmer. Without .NET, 'MS Windows' is 36+ different operating systems: C and C++ Windows programmers must test for the presence of a library on each operating system before using it, and then provide workarounds if it is missing.  By making all versions of Windows alike to a programmer, Microsoft for the first time, with .NET, achieved making 'Windows' like one OS.  Microsoft also gained a formidable a cross-language interworking ability, which has not yet occurred as much for the JVM (although it's finally beginning to happen with Jython and now JRuby et al.). This all seems to get lost in the emotional rhetoric surrounding the alleged cross-platform 'failure' of .NET.Harborsparrow 17:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Platform independence
Talk:Erzincan Province

message: ==false category==
To Garzo: Erzincan has nothing to do with kurdistan nor the rest of the cities of Turkey. If you so badly want to add another category to this article you may add "Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi" which is the name of the geographical region that Erzincan is in.
http://www.gizlicennetler.com/images/doguanadolu.jpg
levent 18:47, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: To Garzo: Erzincan has nothing to do with kurdistan nor the rest of the cities of Turkey. If you so badly want to add another category to this article you may add "Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi" which is the name of the geographical region that Erzincan is in.
http://www.gizlicennetler.com/images/doguanadolu.jpg
levent 18:47, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: false category
Template talk:User longhorn

message: Fair use image has been removed in accordance with WP policy on image use in templates.  I will be making a hook 'em hand sign icon for use in this template today.  No need to fear :-) -Scm83x 18:42, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the image to a photo of the UT Tower, and changed the color of the trim to burnt orange. Hope you like it! Angr/talk 23:52, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This image issue was resolved several months ago.  I think you misinterpreted the need for a new image.  Thanks. — Scm83x hook 'em 00:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't misinterpret it. I thought it might be nice to have a new picture, one that's associated with the University per se and not just with the football team. Angr/talk 00:23, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This hook 'em image was created specifically for use in this template.  I wouldn't say that the hook 'em horns hand sign is restricted to athletic usage. It is used in many contexts and does truly represent the university to many of those unfamiliar with its other aspects. Additionally, the tower image is crammed into the box.  The use of the hook 'em image gives a clear picture of what we are trying to represent with a clear image that was created specifically for this purpose. — Scm83x hook 'em 00:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Gomer (disambiguation)

message: Gomer is also a word used in John Ringo's "Ghost" as a generic name for people from the third world.  It's clearly insulting, and arguably racist.
--Po8crg 18:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

message: what's a Gomer when he joins an illegal motorcycle race, just as seen on the Game Road Rash? Quote by rasher Slater: “If a Gomer takes me out, they come with me”. Disambiguation to this, anyone? --Saviour1981 (talk) 12:21, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gomer in the Game "Road Rash"
Talk:1932 United States Senate elections

message: Colorado should be marked as a Democratic hold, not a gain. It is treated as a hold by the race summary and the seat change. GigachadGigachad (talk) 01:32, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikimap
Talk:San Miniato

message: I added this page on January 2nd, 2006, synthesizing a variety of Internet based resources.  It is useful as a starting point for those with better and/or more information. JVian 18:54, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

message: "... another brief period between 1777 and 1779 during the Napoleonic conquest." 2.34.190.103 (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not bad for a 8-year-old 
Talk:Withyham

message: It seems a great pity that, with the wealth of information on the first of the two external links, there is not a great deal more to add about Withyham!. Nothing is said about Buckhurst, the seat of the Earl De La Warr, for example; and although one correspondent on the article is the webmaster of the parish church, that there is nothing said about the 17th century fire! I am sure that this doesn't need to be a Stub Peter Shearan 18:58, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I am currently working on expanding this page to tell more of the history of WIthyham.
As a resident i was disappointed to discover the lack of information, and now hope to rectify that.
Withyham1 21:22, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: We now seem to have gone completely overboard with all that information about the church and its history! When I wrote the above note, I was considering that we might include more about the village and particularly the civil parish (Notes here) itself: its location in an AONB; in fact anything but history! I am afraid that there is a very thriving historical society in the village, who have scoured many ancient documents to reach the info given in the first two external links: surely all we need to do is to pick out the main thrust of it all, and give the references for those folk who need more. There are 42 civil parishes (CP) in the Wealden District, and IMO the CP articles should all try to look much the same as each other. Peter Shearan (talk) 14:46, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Position of article 31/3/2008

message: In view of the above I have rewritten this article. It means a huge reduction, I realise, but what was there seemed very repetitive (especially the timeline) and covered some details which can be picked up from the reference I have put at the head of the History section, should anyone need to delve into the minutiae! I would have written to the editor who added it all, but he has no talk page. Peter Shearan (talk) 05:57, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite of article

message: Back in June an anonymous IP added some details about Phil Stafford. A quick Google search found no mention of the claims in the article although I did find that a Phil Stafford was the chairman of the governors of St Michaels School .  Hoax?  ++ MortimerCat (talk) 06:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phil Stafford
Talk:Beulah Park racetrack

message: The "trivia" remark of "one unlucky patron to lose $34,000" is about the most insulting comment I've seen on wikipedia. How about the horse that died? The $34,000 was wagered- it was put in for a risk with a good chance at it being lost. And indeed the bettor/punter failed to collect regardless if the horse came in last or failed to finish. Point being for citing this meaningless and unverified claim? --Kellsboro Jack 18:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, and there's no verification. I struck the comment. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 04:08, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Madthunder

message: Should we move this to Mad Thunder?
It's written as a single word on the NJR boxes I've seen. Leave it here and create "Mad Thunder" as a redirect page. ~~ Saberwyn
I realize it's a matter of opinion, but I don't think Mad Thunder's construction is 'reasonably complex given its size'.. In fact it's easily THE simplest large zoid to assemble. The larger a zoid is, the more complex one would reasonably expect it to be, yet MT has unjointed legs and tail and a fairly simple stocky body with very large pieces on the sprues.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 (talk) 20:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Andreas Pavel

message: ==Untitled==
Pavel was born in Germany, moved to Brazil when he was 6 and has Brazilian citizenhip. Does that make him – as far as Wikipedia is concerned – Brazilian or German? — User:CrisDias
:Since he has lived most of his life in Brazil and does possess citizenship for that country, I think calling him Brazilian is fair. Deyyaz [ Talk | Contribs ] 16:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citizenship

message: Pavel was born in Germany, moved to Brazil when he was 6 and has Brazilian citizenhip. Does that make him – as far as Wikipedia is concerned – Brazilian or German? — User:CrisDias
:Since he has lived most of his life in Brazil and does possess citizenship for that country, I think calling him Brazilian is fair. Deyyaz [ Talk | Contribs ] 16:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added some text with information I took from the website I refer there. But I don't like that site very much (tough the information seems quite plausible).  It seems there's a newspaper article about him, I'll try to read it!... -- NIC1138 04:35, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life in Brazil
Talk:List of extinct animals of the Netherlands

message: Fluri (Revision as of 01:07, 1 January 2006) changed Salmo trutta fario into Salmo trutta. I've changed it back, because the official Dutch 2004 Red List of Threatened Species, published by the Dutch government, list this lost animal as a subspecies, namely: Salmo trutta fario. Salmo trutta trutta (Sea trout) could previously also be found on the Dutch Red List, but has been removed in 2004. Pmaas 19:11, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salmo trutta fario 

message: why there are a lot of animals that are not extinct on this page?
* Well that's because this is a nonsense list. The term 'extinct' is used in most of these pages in the wrong way. They mean with 'extinct': species that have been observed once ( in historical time, so max. past 200 years) and that now are not observed anymore. This does not mean that the taxa are not present anymore, they have not been observed anymore. These are also NOT extinct, but 'disappeared' from the region. In most cases the time of observation has been too short to even conclude for a local extinction. Conservationalists and ecologists almost always lack knowledge of the fossil record (including the record of the recent Holocene!!!). A static view of the world is also very commonly present. --Tom Meijer 12:32, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Another remark. If this page was about extinct species, hundreds even thousands of taxa should be added. This makes no sense at all--Tom Meijer 12:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  why are there animals that are not extinct? 

message: The wild cat was extinct before de 1950's, but now a few wild cats are discovered again, and is officially not extinct anymore.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mweites (talk • contribs) 12:56, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wild cat 

message: "Once these birds were very common in the Netherlands, but their number decreased fast in the 20th century. 1891 was the first year that no White Stork bred in the Netherlands."
If none bred since 1891,   then surely the period of rapid decline was the 19th,  not the 20th century.Eregli bob (talk) 07:48, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsensical statement 
Talk:City Hall and City Duma

message: Coth, as always, good job buddy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.131.155.34 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:KCEB

message: Edited to cover recent switch of KCEB from UPN to WB affiliation and change of LPTV relays 48 and 58 to independent.--James Stanley Barr 19:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why isn't KCEB on cable anymore? It's a must-carry station, so it's got to be on cable somewhere. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  April 2019
Talk:Republic P-43 Lancer

message: This article has been updated to conform to the WikiProject Aircraft manual of style: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aircraft/page_content. - Emt147 Burninate! 19:32, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Hercules Unchained

message: I'm very confused at how this article states the the movie's release date is in 2002.  Vash The Stampede 19:36, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: release date

message: SickBoy, thanks for uploading an image for this article.  That said, you broke the italics and bolding in the first paragraph, and also made it so that the preceded link went to Hercules's actual labors, as opposed to the previous movie.  Please be careful on these things!
Anyway, for what it's worth, my only knowledge of this film is from MST3K which used "Unchained."  That said, what's the policy for moves like this?  Was the "International English" title ever actually used?  I mean, yes, it's a literal translation of the Italian, but still.  Since the main reason people will come to this article (I think!) is due to laughing at it from MST3K, it's best to use the name most known. SnowFire 02:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change.
Talk:Montana State Capitol

message: 69.181.123.119 contributed most of the article in one copy / paste move. It is a duplicate of http://montanakids.com/db_engine/presentations/presentation.asp?pid=3&sub=Capitol+History so I have removed it unless someone can prove it was here first. --Dual Freq 13:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: The picture on this article is clearly not the current Montana state capitol building.  I don't know if it is mislabeled or perhaps a rendering of a proposed building, but the article does not make that clear.  Can anyone put an actual photograph of the building on this page? 64.61.29.102 (talk) 20:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Having been alerted to this, 5 months later, on Humanities reference desk, this is definitely not the Montana capitol, and I have removed it from the article. Maybe it's an early artist's conception, but it's not the right building. It bears a strong (though not identical) reference to the Minnesota capitol, which of course does not have mountains in the background. Someone pulled a fast one on the Library of Congress with this image. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 07:58, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the LOC page this was a competition drawing, not the final design, so one can logically conclude that a different design won. howcheng  {chat} 23:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that issue was settled awhile back, though apparently not here. The architect combined elements of the St. Paul building and the Arkansas building, I think it was, and submitted the design. The eventual winning design was different. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 00:43, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures?
Talk:North Dakota State Capitol

message: I realise criticism sections, like virtually everything else that made wikipedia interesting and useful back in the day, are now considered somewhat passé by Jimbo and friends, but the complete LACK of criticism in this article really needs to be addressed.  Even in cities that are otherwise hideous, American state capitols are almost always beautiful examples of the sort of neo-classical early American architecture that never seemed to catch on elsewhere.  But having an eye-meltingly hideous office tower instead is almost an affront to the people of North Dakota.  Seriously, this building is so ugly it looks like it belongs in Boston's financial district.   
24.91.244.221 (talk) 00:18, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism?   
Talk:Golden Gate Fields

message: The land of the Golden Gate Fields straddles both Albany and Berkeley. For example, these zoning maps on Berkeley's official website show the city extending north of Harrison St. and running to the water, covering land consisting of Golden Gate Fields. Even Golden Gate Fields' own website lists their address as Berkeley. -Krasnoludek (talk) 23:15, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Albany and Berkeley
Talk:Rose of Lima

message: "It is said that a beautiful rose petal entered the window and gently touched the face of the baby and then vanished. From that day on her mother, Maria, called her Rose." Indeed. This kind of tripe is alkays more encyclopedic if it can be directly quoted. There is a lot of popular Rose of Lima sentimental literature that might be quoted. Then it wouldn't sound as though Wikipedia is "reporting" this. --Wetman 03:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a book on St. Rose. It is said tha Marianna (their servant) said she looked like a rose and that she came from the garden of heaven  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.214.192.44 (talk) 18:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name "Rose" 

message: peploe say that she was crazy other said she wasent 
she wasnt the only think is that the way they see the wirld at that time is different than this time they think that the body was from the devil
this crearly represents a psychological pathology.... but what paethology did rose of lima suffer?. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.40.55.188 (talk) 20:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was she crazy?? 

message: Since Rose was not the name she was given in baptism, this baptismal name should be mentioned in the article. 71.53.213.180 (talk) 12:45, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her real name 

message: Does anyone know for sure?  The article stated several different dates at several different places within the article (August 24; August 25; August 15; etc.)  For consistency, I changed them all to August 24.  I am not sure if that is correct or not.  I made all of the dates of death in the article to read, consistently, as August 24 because the article stated as follows: Her liturgical feast was inserted into the General Roman Calendar in 1729 for celebration initially on August 30, because August 24, the date of her death, is the feast of Saint Bartholomew the Apostle and August 30 was the closest date not already allocated to a well-known saint..  Again, does anyone know her death date for sure?  Thanks.  Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 05:12, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 
Talk:Sit flying

message: Freeflying/Sit flying → Sit flying (freeflying) – {more consistent with wikipedia naming policy}
===Voting===
*Support, more consistent with wikipedia naming policy Melaen 19:46, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: *Support, more consistent with wikipedia naming policy Melaen 19:46, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting