lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ashraf Aman

message: So far I mainly just copyedited for good English style. I removed the word "extraordinary," since it is pretty POV. Do all of those external links need to be there? They seem to be redundant. (They would be inappropriate commercial links on almost any other page, but perhaps they are OK here since they are directly pertinent.) -- Spireguy 22:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: The article is good information wise but need more classifications in the interest of Mountain climbers lovers,--Ali Mohammad Khilji (talk) 21:58, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Good information about Ashraf

message: I have fix the reference link hope this will help the Article for notability,  --Aslam Kassi 20:21, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: reference Link

message: As they both covered similar subjects I've merged these two.  [Apart from that, there were errors and discrepancies in the Honours mentioned.]  Qwrk (talk) 16:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged the mountaineering and honours sections
Talk:Early Birds of Aviation

message: What is the significance of 17 December 1916? Emeraude 17:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On that date the US Army started training pilots in larger numbers for WWI. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:16, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date 

message: I have doubts we can justify every creating an article on so many people, and also doubts that it makes sense to have so many redlinks. With the number of redlinks we have here I also have to wonder, have people made sure all the currently listed links actually go to the right article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:00, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a page that doesn't know if it's an article or a list. If the list of members is noteworthy it should probably be spun off into its own page. Retswerb (talk) 02:57, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we have so many redlinks in an article 

message: There are evidently 2 different organizations with this name. The first disolved, and then a later organization was formed using the same name. Part of me thinks we maybe should have seperate articles on the two different organizations. We should at a minimum not use the description of the current organization in 1 paragraphy, then give the history of the other, and then explain how the current organization came to be.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:02, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The opening and explanation is a mess 

message: This appears to only have US members with the odd exception. I think this needs to be made clear upfraot if not in the title. I came here looking for all pioneers and this is not what I expected. 86.15.94.125 (talk) 16:09, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality
Talk:Cheltenham Festival (disambiguation)

message: I'm not sure we need a disambiguation page here as there's only two options.  Perhaps better would be it linking to one page with the top saying something like 'for the (either racing or music) look here'.
However, we could do with an article for the music. --Davebesag 22:29, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Run (baseball)

message: Can anyone find any info out there on average runs broken down by inning? Maybe broken down separately by decade would be even better. I know that the first inning scores on average the most out of any inning but I'd love to see some solid sources on the matter and maybe it can be included on the page. Dancindazed (talk) 02:27, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  When are the most runs scored in a baseball game? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 03:00, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Run (baseball) →  – Runs exist identically in the rules of baseball and softball. Unless we're considering softball a variety of baseball (which we very well could), the parenthetical should include the two separate sports in which this concept exists. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 01:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 April 2022
Talk:Acisclus

message: When I added an infobox for this page, I also demoted the importance to "Low." This is because I don't think that Saint Acsiclus is really all that notable of a saint. His profiles at Patron Saints Index and Saint of the Day are paragraphical. Furthermore, an image search retrieves no pertinent images, so he probably wasn't a common art subject. Alekjds talk 04:51, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance
Talk:International Association of Homes and Services for the Aging

message: Please join us on 13 December 2020, 12:00-14:00 EST, as we update and improve articles in Wikipedia related to housing in the United States of America. Sign up here. -- M2545 (talk) 10:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invitation to [[Wikipedia:Meetup/US_housing/December_2020|US Housing Edit-a-thon]]
Talk:Economy of Kansas City

message: This article should be expanded to the metro area.  Americasroof 22:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kansas City metro economy
Talk:Patrick Forge

message: This article needs to be expanded but should definitely not be deleted. Forge has just released a new CD with Gilles Peterson  - a retrospective of their days at Dingwalls djing together, I'll add the details when I get time. He's also had several other releases (compilations) in his own right Escaper7 22:34, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Ady An

message: I created a little "filmography table" for her. For anyone who follows An Yixuan really closely (I'm her fan but I only know her post-Chinese Paladin, could someone please look up some of her roles, particularly in her earlier series? I can't seem to find a source. And feel free to update. Thanks! Lulu288 22:40, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of The Adventures of the Galaxy Rangers episodes

message: Acknowleding that links will need to be cleaned up after the split from the main page. Rabbi Bob 22:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: The episodes listed on wikipedia are chronologically wrong according to this official source  82.19.246.69 01:51, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are ordered by production number. I've updated the intro to note this. AnmaFinotera (talk) 21:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode order

message: I've diwikied the episode titles as individual episodes of a show to not need individual articles and having them wikified gives the appearance they should be created.  This was done in accordance to WP:EPISODE and the discussions at Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents/Episodes (as was the merging in of the one episode that already had an individual article created.  AnmaFinotera (talk) 21:07, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean Up

message: I have gained permission from the original author Rabbi Bob to use the information  for episode guides I have contacted the wikipedia permissions board but recieved no repsonse —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwanyewest (talk • contribs) 21:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Out of curiosity, is there any particular reason you want to copy from that site rather than just writing fresh episode summaries?  There is plenty of course material to do so, even without being able to see the episodes.  AnmaFinotera (talk) 21:46, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most likely because a fair portion of the material was either submitted by and/or seen by persons directly affiliated with the show itself (Dan Fiorella for example).  Considering that some sites have copy/pasted verbatim from our work, I figured permission was the least I could to keep some of that work alive in some aspect. Rabbi Bob (talk) 21:56, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Beta Mountain
Talk:Xenos (Greek)

message: I think this page has better case for precedence as being the main Xenos page over Xenos (GPU). Thoughts at Talk:Xenos pls--ZayZayEM (talk) 06:26, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main [[Xenos]] 

message: *Xenos → Xenos (graphics chip)
*Xenos (Greek) → Xenos
See Talk:Xenos#Requested move.  --Una Smith (talk) 19:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of requested move 

message: Xenophobia 41.114.154.221 (talk) 18:29, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xenophobia
Talk:American Ninja

message: I removed this from the "list of sequels" Canon themselves has stated that it's not related to the series. This is most likely due to them not having the IP rights for the series, which to me, says it doesn't belong here. After all you woulden't put the Asylum's Titanic II as a sequel to James Cameron's Titanic.  --Deathawk (talk) 01:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: American Ninja Apprentice

message: The references suggest that the reception wasn't mixed but rather negative. What critics thought it was a good or even decent movie? - Tournesol (talk) 15:53, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , it appears that the first sentence is inappropriately WP:SYNTHesized from three individual critics. That should be removed. However, Metacritic does show here that of five reviews, three were categorized as mixed, and two were categorized as negative. It's not a good sample size, but that breakdown could be shared in the article. The Rotten Tomatoes rating average of 3.6 out of 10 can be included too. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 18:35, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed reception with critics?
Talk:Jane Randolph Jefferson

message: So, I saw this article recently, about Thomas Jefferson's alleged African-American ancestry: http://www.diversityinc.com/public/1461.cfm . I quote:
:Jefferson, who served two terms between 1801 and 1809, was described as the "son of a half-breed Indian squaw and a Virginia mulatto father," as stated in Vaughn's findings. Jefferson also was said to have destroyed all documentation attached to his mother, even going to extremes to seize letters written by his mother to other people.
What's the basis of these allegations? Any foundation in truth? None of it seems to be borne out by our article about Jane Randolph Jefferson (or Peter Jefferson, for that matter); where is it coming from? --ESP (talk) 02:44, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw the same article. The basis for the allegation (and for most or all of the articles other allegations of Presidents with African American ancestry) seems to be racial allegations of long ago political detractors which are taken at face value by people in our era looking to find Presidents with African American ancestry. The claims are either demonstrably false (as with Jefferson and Andrew Jackson), or plausible only if using some one-drop rule, due to lack of genealogical evidence. See Black People and Their Place in History, which is the book by Vaughn the article relies on, for further debunking. CAVincent (talk) 03:20, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "half-breed Indian squaw" 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.monticello.org/site/jefferson/jane-randolph-jefferson. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:13, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Adrenaline/Archive 4

message: There's 2 undefined ref errors (see Epinephrine#References) that cite content in the Epinephrine#Society and culture section. I don't feel like going through the article history to find the right revisions to fix this at the moment, so I'm posting this thread in the event anyone is interested in doing so to replace the undefined named references. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 00:11, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undefined reference errors 

message: I have copied the text from Epinephrine to here in accordance with talk page discussion there -- "adrenaline" is the more common term when talking about it as a hormone. See Epinephrine (no redirect) for history and talk. Eric Kvaalen (talk) 14:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume you saw this post after 'moving text'...--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:27, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied from Epinephrine

message: Hoelzer DR, Dalsky GP, Schwartz NS, Clutter WE, Shah SD, Holloszy JO, Cryer PE (July 1986). "Epinephrine is not critical to prevention of hypoglycemia during exercise in humans". The American Journal of Physiology. 251 (1 Pt 1): E104–10. PMID 3524257  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vctrbarbieri (talk • contribs) 18:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A retracted article is being cited 

message: and .. if around all .. - zachem tebe smart!-phone! ? Or kalykulyator.. 
Наплюй! " ) .. Таблицу множения" на тетрадку ! Кляксами или натурально. Естественно!! 
Планету крючит эмошн!! ))) .. 176.59.202.142 (talk) 10:47, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mochidrenajnalin ..  

message: Looking at the society and culture sections they seem to be stubs of articles and the two paragraphs there don't seem to add much to knowledge of adrenaline. In Vita Veritas (talk) 18:01, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Society and culture section 

message: The nitrogen shows an extra hydrogen.
:That's because it's a zwitterion in the crystal structure. A proton from an ROH group is transferred to the R2NH group leaving RO− and R2NH2+ groups. The image description page at :File:Adrenaline-from-xtal-3D-bs-17.png has the literature reference: Acta Chem. Scand. (1975), 29b, 239-244. The full text is free to read. --Ben (talk) 23:04, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ball and stick model
Talk:Legend of Diego Salcedo

message: Can anybody provide somo reference to this version of the story;" Many books assert that the soldier had been told he'd be taken to a lake filled with Taíno women that he could have sex with, and, once there, he found not women, but men who then proceeded to drown him." I have never heard of this before and have not read a single book with this story and I really wanto to know about it. I will be very pleased if at least someone can cite at least on of those "many books [that] assert" this version.
The reason they (Taino culture; they were not indians; that is an error of great proportions that the navigator committed somo 500 years ago.  Error that can be verified once you know the reason for the trip that brought him to these waters and places.)  kept him for some days (3) wwas that they did beleive that after 3 days the spirit has left the body, the evidence of that is the stink that emanates from a dead body. You can also see this upon the reason for why Jesus "took so long" for the resurrection of Lazarus.
65.23.232.203 21:24, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eric Poehlman

message: Everyone makes mistakes and Mr. E Poehlman was no exception. They made an example of him but how many other scientists/people are guilty of the same but have never been caught. This is not an excuse but the truth. Mr. Poehlman is a great teacher and my daughter has benefited from having him as a teacher. She is lucky to have had the opportunity to benefit of all his experience and knowledge in science. He is commited to education and we are lucky to have him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.154.93.238 (talk) 11:29, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  My teacher
Talk:Canton Charter Academy

message: I have been to this school, and it is very nice.
The statements
'CCA is an excellent learning environment for students of all ages' and
' Many students enjoy their years at "CCA" and are well prepared for years to come- with advanced learning and a great environment.'
don't seem like they belong here. 78.105.45.56 (talk) 12:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Programme (booklet)

message: We should move this to "souvenir programme" or something disambiguated like "programme (booklet)", any objections? The term "event programme" in reference to what the article is talking about isn't really used. For example, an image search for souvenir programme actualy gets you relevant results and for event programme, you get results which are not relevant at all. - Epson291 (talk) 00:49, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I moved it to programme (booklet), since "souvenir programme" doesn't appear to be a universally used appellation. The British spelling should be used (i.e., programme over program) since it was originally started as this in 2005. - Epson291 (talk) 03:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: The OED clearly distinguishes between a "program," meaning a notice (esp. a sheet or booklet) of an event's proceedings that is issued to an audience, and a "playbill," meaning a bill or poster that is used to advertise an event and that includes performer names. The existence of Playbill, a company that issues programs, may add to the confusion of these two terms, but they are distinct. Playbill makes programs, but playbills are not programs. I think that this page needs to remove mention of playbills and/or clarify the distinction between the terms. Josephpaulhill (talk) 20:51, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Program vs. playbill
Talk:Delphi Schools

message: Placing here the link to an essay removed from the main article but which may have some value to editors wanting to research this topic to expand this article.
* Case study of L. Ron Hubbard's education: The Delphi Academy in LA by Steve Keller
Grorp (talk) 03:45, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  An essay re Delphi
Talk:Joint Security Station Falcon

message: Is this true? There are two photos, along with a large list of names.
If this is actually real, then it was a major disaster, I mean, 300 dead...  :o
--Planetary 23:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. One comment I've read about the supposed list of names is the lack of female names, which is unrepresentative of US forces currently in Iraq.  Some links and discussion on Wonkette. -- Infrogmation 02:38, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

text: For future reference, tbrnews.org is not a reliable source: Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_172#Gregory_Douglas_and_TBRNews.org. Location (talk) 19:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: No casualties?

message: It's not a "camp" Falcon is a FOB.  No one calls it "Camp Falcon".  Camps are much bigger. How do we change it?
Matt Sanchez 23:40, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FOB Falcon

message: The last few sentences of the second paragraph seem to be off-topic. They describe the activities of the 439th Battalion ("finished repairing a compound", "worked with many Iraqi contractors and vendors", "water and irrigation systems continued to improve") rather than provide information about FOB Falcon. I suggest removing these sentences in the absence of something that links the information to the subject of FOB Falcon. –Black Falcon (Talk) 18:50, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Anecdotal information that was probably added by someone with personal experience at the camp.Yeago (talk) 11:35, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ✓ Done. I also discovered that the text was copied verbatim from a GlobalSecurity.org article... –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 18:05, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  439th Battalion 

message: i deleted the entire bullshit conspiracy theory section on the grounds that it was blatant propaganda,provided no proof or refrences of its statements,and didnt belong at all. hopefully some nutjob wont put it back up.68.206.123.207 (talk) 20:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello there. I am certainly not a notjob, nor did I add that section due to any reasons of propaganda. There were many conspiracy theories about that event, this was documented, and you are incorrect in saying there were 'no references'. Are these theories correct? Not necessarily (and probably not at all).Yeago (talk) 21:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with Yeago on this. There is absolutely no credibility behind Jihadspun's claim (I would suggest that even calling the claim a "conspiracy theory" is being too generous), but the fact that the website made the claim is verifiable and documented. The article does not present the claim as fact and so does not advance the website's propaganda. –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 21:23, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Any suggestions for improving the section would be appreciated. I have made a couple of edits to the article, but they mostly addressed sourcing, formatting, and copyright issues outside of the "Conspiracy theories" section, so they may not address your concerns. –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 18:10, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  jihad propaganda
Talk:Fantazia (rave music promoter)

message: WP:NPOV This page reads like an advert for Fantazia, with a lot of unsubstantiated figures.  The langauage needs to be toned down and made more factual.
Amateursurgeon 23:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  It's pure PR fluff without a single source listed, other than their own website.  Unless someone can Wikify it soon, I'm going to WP:PROD it. Bricology (talk) 23:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Torreya nucifera

message: I removed the following content:
But some of the trees have grown in Jeju island of South Korea which is the most sothern part of the Korean peninsula. However, the status of whole forest is not proven taken by Japanese or its territory. From this, it can be assumed that Torreya nucifera is also origin to Korea. (Cited to: p.482 , 
"우리가 정말 알아야 할 우리 나무 백 가지"(100 trees we should "really" know), 1995-2-28 )
It seemed excessive and unnecessary, serving a nationalistic agenda uncalled for in an article on a plant. There's no need to bring politics and nationalism (and issues of national boundaries) into this. Trees and where they are native to has nothing to do with political boundaries, with cultural or military imperialism, with adamantly and valiantly defending Korean islands from any implication whatsoever that because a particular "Japanese" tree grows there that it could somehow be considered a "Japanese" island....  LordAmeth (talk) 20:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed content

message: How long does a kaya tree live? (The age influences the costs of using kaya to make go boards.) SlowJog (talk) 19:24, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lifespan?