lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Monarch butterfly

message: In the third paragraph in "Vision", I changed "This is may be because flowers..." to "This may be because flowers...".  But I haven't studied whether the consensus of the reputable scientific community considers the matter uncertain or certain.  If the later it should be changed again to "This is because flowers..." of course.  Cheers. --H Bruce Campbell (talk) 07:15, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor typo correction in the third "Vision" paragraph. 

message: Here in Australia, as far as i can tell, the wings dont have anywhere near the amount of white and black as shown here. I will try to get some images and put them up. 120.153.220.134 (talk) 12:23, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The look slightly different in Australia 

message: The tetrachromic vision section is poorly written. Having read it three times now, I gather that there ae UV, blue, unfiltered green, and orange-filtered green receptors, with the differential between unfilt green and filt green being interpreted as shades of red / orange / yellow. 
IS that correct? In any case, it needs to be better written. I'm not skilled enough to do that. 2001:8003:E40F:9601:2586:E005:AF6E:B56B (talk) 07:44, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Vision" section is difficult to understand 

message: I have read, a long time ago, that these butterflies are brightly coloured to warn potential predators that they are not good to eat because they are bitter because they feed on (bitter) milkweed. Also, that there are other butterflies / moths that are actually not bitter (and are good to ear) but mimic the Monarch as a bluff. Is that true? If so, someone better skilled at scientific writing than I should include that somewhere in this article. 2001:8003:E40F:9601:2586:E005:AF6E:B56B (talk) 07:50, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance of their bright colours.
Talk:Original Pirate Material

message: Why is (sic)shooters listed in the album reviews? Check the link - it doesn't seem note-worthy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.7.131.48 (talk) 22:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Dipole

message: In the section for the electric dipole it says that the equation is formally identical to the one for the magnetic dipole. Of course this has to be true, so I just wanted to rearrange the equations to bring out this correspondence clearly (pulling r^3 out of the parentheses). But then I saw this Dirac's delta-term. Can anybody tell me where it would actually make sense to define the field like that? As I see it, only having the first term would be completely fine, a continuous function multiplied by r^(-3). Also note that the second term has no negative power of r, so this term is actually completely swamped by the first. Apart from that, its prefactor is not consistent with the one of the magnetic dipole. So I would just delete this term in both the magnetic and electric formula, just as I find it in Classical Electrodynamics by Jackson or the german or italian wikipedia. Seattle Jörg (talk) 07:02, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look at Magnetic_moment#Internal_magnetic_field_of_a_dipole. RockMagnetist (talk) 16:31, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I see sense in that. Is there a reference? Otherwise I would have to reproduce it by hand. Seattle Jörg (talk) 12:38, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added citations. Unfortunately, I don't have the page numbers for the Brown citations because I didn't add them at the time and now I don't have the book. I'll try to get hold of it again. RockMagnetist (talk) 17:07, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vector field equations 

message: For some reason I thought the field lines conventionally flow from North to South, not the other way around, but I could be wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by I want a bear as a pet (talk • contribs) 21:03, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The north and south in the diagram are earth's geographic north and south. I believe this diagram should be replaced with a better one that clearly shows that the sphere is not a magnetic dipole but earth. The current diagram does nothing but cause befuddlement. Rock-Bottom007 (talk) 12:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the North-South on a sphere dipole figure correct?
Talk:Rings Around the World

message: *The title of the album should be moved to Rings Around the World (capitalized A in Around) because this is the proper formatting of the title. --Hraefen Talk 23:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Museum of Military History, Vienna

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Per consensus, on grounds of ambiguity. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 01:22, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Museum of Military History, Vienna →  – Only one with this name Gryffindor (talk) 23:19, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 December 2023
Talk:No Roots (album)

message: Sadly the person who put the features list wasn't registered. Now the famous Nina Simone jazz singer died in 2003 so it is unlikely she appeared on this 2005 album unless a) it was a sample of her work or b) she recorded it years ago and Faithless just happened to stumble across it. Could just be another person by that name. Either way for clarity's sake I'd like to know if it is to keep my computer tags fully informational, I don't have the CD and booklet with me, anyone who does and can confirm the featured artists, please do. Tony2Times 21:35, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nina Simone
Talk:Reverence (Faithless album)

message: Was this remastered?  AJUK </font>Talk!! 20:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-issued
Talk:Stevie Brock

message: ATTENTION: New Picture needed. Brock has totally changed appearance and the current picture is inaccurate.
ATTN: The new picture is an improvement over the last, but still does not depict Brock as of late 2005. An more accurate image can be found on his official website,  (note the natural hair color change and overall transformation of style).
Note: as per WP:BLP, please do not give unnecessary personal information (name of highschool, address, etc.) David.Monniaux 15:09, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Reverence / Irreverence

message: I agree the article should be merged with Reverence (album) and this article and it's redirects should point instead to the reverence disambiguation page. That's because as a common word I think it's much less likely someone is looking for one of these two albums if they enter reverence or irreverence into the search box. Therefore, they should end up at the disambig page. - Owlmonkey (talk) 16:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Discussion

message: Please re-integrate this with the "Reverence" article. It is clearly and obiviously a companion/remix cd, and is not a full album in its own right.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.185.32.4 (talk) 14:36, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I agree
Talk:Everything Will Be Alright Tomorrow

message: What is the correct spelling of the album? --darklilac 16:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saturday 

message: i suggest merging this article with the No Roots article. the music, artwork are all the same, these are just instumentals. 165.228.105.74 20:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree - It's an album in it's own right and has original material on it.  Chappy84 22:55, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Agree - Hardly. The only "new" material is one track tacked onto the end. I'll eat my pants if the band themselves even regard this as anything more than a instrumental companion to No Roots.218.185.32.4 (talk) 14:40, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with No Roots
Talk:Leftism (album)

message: Hello, . There are a few reasons I reverted your edit, first was because it was that the the infobox should reflect the prose within the genre. In this case, the article clearly states that the source (the one you referred to in your last edit) should not be simply referred to as a "progressive house LP" and that it "spans a wide range of influences (tribal, dub, trance)". Most other review mention that it is a house album (just search the page for the term house). As for your edit and source, per WP:ALBUMS standards, we do not use AllMusic's sidebar a source. If you have any further questions, i'll be happy discuss them here. :) Andrzejbanas (talk) 15:59, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre
Talk:I Should Coco

message: Does anyone really oppose this edit? dannymusiceditor  oops  02:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  release date in lead
Talk:Sisters (American TV series)

message: I clearly recall an all-female show in the early 90s -- and I think it was Sisters -- had its premiere episode banned in some parts of the US due to an opening sequence in which the lead characters discussed orgasms. Does anyone else remember this? It should be mentioned in the article if it was this series as the controversy gave the show a boost in its early ratings. I tried to Google this to confirm, but as you can imagine, "Sisters" and "orgasms" doesn't exactly produce applicable results, even when I toss Sela Ward's name in there. 23skidoo 01:52, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Confirmed in this interview with the exec producer.  Someone want to write a snippet about it?  Seems like it should be mentioned. Air.dance 13:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First episode banned?
Talk:Seal (1991 album)

message: I think Dance-pop should be added.JanderVK (talk) 09:16, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dance-pop
Talk:Nepean High School (Ottawa)

message: I think there should be sources provided for the statistics. Thanks Ph33rspace (talk) 00:27, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: i added 
bruce cockburn (very famous folk musician)
and simon ackwayus (a local artist, some his works are on display in the national gallery(in ottawa))
*      -i verified this today 74.104.89.5 06:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  notable alumni 

message: I removed the sentence concerning N-tek, I can't see any basis for such an assumption. As well Nepean is only part of the OCDSB (Ottawa Carleton District School Board) not the OCCDSB (Ottawa Carleton Catholic District School Board) which is actually now the OCCSB (remove district from the above). Given the unbacked biased statement and factual error it seemed best just to remove. (Isall 07:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  N-tek 
Talk:Boolean algebra (basic concepts)

message: This article is intended to cover the basic, common usage of the term "Boolean algebra".  This is the one taught in middle school and high school to everyone, not the more complex "Boolean algebra" theory which mathematicians take in college.  Therefore, please don't add any material on "homomorphism", "isomorphism", "rings", "ideals", "filters", "axiomatic bases", "duality" or "lattices" here, those belong in the other article. StuRat 02:14, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intent of this article 

message: I would like to add examples of subsets, proper subsets, supersets, and proper supersets.  I would also like to add examples with Venn diagrams of 3 or more sets. I couldn't find any suitable illustrations for these concepts, so will need to make my own, which could take a day or two. I would also like to add specific applications examples, such as database queries and search engine parameters. StuRat 02:14, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I struck-out items already addressed. StuRat 16:16, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I struck out the remaining item (Venn diagram of 3 or more sets), as it has now been added.  I would like to work more on the transition from section to section, but that will need to wait a few days as I will be busy for a bit. Meanwhile, I will place this article under Boolean logic and see if anybody besides the PhDs complains. StuRat 12:35, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add 

message: I've replaced the "dehydrated red apple" example with an example using integers and sets of even numbers, multiples of 3, and multiples of 5.  I may create a suitable illustration using a universe of integers from and including 0 to and including 30.  It may not be needed, though. What do you guys think ? StuRat 23:13, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  New example 

message: This article was moved by StuRat to Boolean logic, with that one moved to Boole's syllogistic. Just thought I would let people know. Oleg Alexandrov 15:47, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought the redirect was sufficient to point them to the new article, but I suppose stating it explicitly can't hurt. StuRat 17:05, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  You did not post an edit summary when you did your redirect. Nobody would have been aware of what you did. Oleg Alexandrov 20:22, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note of move
Talk:Roger Ailes

message: the entry "20th Television" currently serves no apparent purpose whatsoever in this list, other than linking to the "20th Television" entry.  do Ailes and 20th Television have anything to do with each other at all?  if so, why does the item not indicate any title or job description?  2601:602:8800:9270:8591:6987:F98A:E37B (talk) 03:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  under Occupation(s)
Talk:Gastón Mazzacane

message: I think this article needs to be rewritten in a better form. It has a lot of loose paragraphs, in my opinion it should be done in a more objective way. I don't have enough knowledge to do this, so I'm tagging this article for someone who knows more about Mazzacane to improve his article.--Ultranol 02:20, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I agree with the classification of 'Start' - Only Mazzacane's brief time in F1 is covered, what was his career before or since? No referencing at all. No seperate lead or structure. See Damon Hill, Alain Prost and Tom Pryce for FA class models. 4u1e 08:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start class

message: For completeness the exclusion from the 2002 Australian GP should be included in the results table - see [Phoenix Finance.Tartanperil (talk) 09:11, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, absolutely not. There was never an entry for Mazzacane or Marques in any race during the 2002 season. The team's entry was never accepted, so there's no question of an exclusion. You have to be on an entry list to be excluded from it. I can turn up to a GP with an F1 car, but like Phoenix Finance, I'd be dreaming. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:40, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, yep fair enough if they weren't accepted. Tartanperil (talk) 03:29, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Phoenix Finance
Talk:Railbox

message: I wrote this because it was on the wanted list but I don't think it's all that good yet. In particular an image that shows a boxcar might be good to add... I won't at all be hurt if you rip it up! The facts could stand checking, they are from memory and the few refs I was able to find with Google. I was unclear whether the equipment template should be included or not. ++Lar 02:26, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It appears that RailBox and RailGon are no longer subsidiaries of TTX, but have merged with TTX and are fully part of TTX.  TTX now owns the markings RBOX, GONX and others. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.243.227.156 (talk) 03:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated information? 

message: AAR Plate-C:
If one looks carefully at this immage one will see that the railbox is marked Plate C — Peter Horn 22:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Loading gauge#North America]]

message: Railroads do not pay demurrage to other railroads. They pay car hire(currently an hourly and mileage based system. Demurrage is charged to consignors and consignees per published tariffs for delays in loading or unloading.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmmkmb (talk • contribs) 17:54, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information
Talk:Traffic break

message: Is there any source for the Cessna landing reference? 71.139.52.104 20:23, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, here it is; I've added it to the article. --David Iberri (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 

message: Has anyone else heard "rolling roadblock" used to refer to a Volkswagen Microbus?  Because I swear I've heard that before.  Don't really know any sources for it, though. 96.18.243.233 (talk) 05:26, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling roadblock? 
Talk:XVIII Airborne Corps Artillery

message: In Sept. of 1967 I was assigned to the XVIII abn. corps Arty at Ft. Bragg. My unit was 4th Bn. 73rd Arty C battery. We were an 8 inch self propelled unit. When I arrived at the unit we did not have our guns. They were issued later. I became Motor officer and set up the TOE for the motorpool. My motor Sgt. was SSG Wilfong. The 1st SGT was Shanklin. Our CO was 2nd LT. Hopkins. Is the 4/73rd still an active unit? Any info. would be appreciated
Donald l. Blankin
e-mail Donnie_B@Charter.net—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.191.213.95 (talk • contribs) 11:38, 15 September 2005.
:See 73rd Field Artillery Regiment (United States) Buckshot06 (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Neckar (car)

message: *I am looking for a Neckar logo, and maybe pictures of Neckar automobiles (the Mistral is the best looking).Hektor 02:42, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Neckar logo
Talk:Easy Come Easy Go (Starflyer 59 album)

message: How do you make one page redirect to another?  This article and Easy Come Easy Go (Starflyer 59 double album) are about the same thing.
--Andres430 02:52, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are a number of articles titled Easy Come Easy Go in Wikipedia, including the better-known topics such as the Elvis Presley movie. I recommend this article be renamed Easy Come Easy Go (Starflyer 59 album). 23skidoo 18:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs to be renamed
Talk:National Liberation Front of Tripura

message: I hardly have any sympathy for NLFT, but its wrong to describe conflict in Tripura primarily as a religious one, but rather a political and ethnic one. NLFT has obviously links to the Christian community in Tripura (in a way the other main rebel group, ATTF, does not), but any claims of actual support from Church organisations to it needs to be backed up by credible source. In my view the religious aspect of NLFT should not be overvalued. They perceive Bengali culture as a threat to theirs and treat any Bengali or tribal in favour of cooperation with Bengalis as an enemy, irrespective of religious belief. --Soman 16:50, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:53, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition 

message: This article is a heap of deadlinks. Can somebody take time to remove all of them? - PrinceMathew (talk) 10:39, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links
Talk:La Foire aux immortels

message: I oppose merging the film article Immortel (Ad Vitam) with this. It is a major film in its own right and worthy of its own article. 24.71.223.140 03:16, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose merger with film article

message: Why not use the English title ?
If not - the book cover shows that Immortels should have a capital 'I'. -- Beardo 04:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The English title is a functional redirect, but as far as the best known title and encyclopedfic emphasis on original publication, I think this article's place under this title is the best choice. As far as the spelling however, you're right. The cover and other sources use capital I and this article ought to be placed at La Foire aux Immortels, currently occupied by another redirect. It should be moved. Murghdisc. 15:58, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: just missing a reference to Nikopol: Secrets of the Immortals  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.222.134 (talk) 03:46, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing refrence to Nikopol
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/1911xMusic

message: I don't want to downplay the work of the people who have transcribed 1911 articles, but looking through the history I can't find a musical content for the following. This is intended to match the content of musical encyclopedias as well as 1911, isn't it? Most of the following links refer to the correct 1911 article, but:
*Bassus is also a part in Renaissance vocal music, like cantus and altus; there's no article about this stuff and I know nothing about this topic
*Battaglia is now Battaglia Terme but the musical equivalent is probably Biber's La Battaglia, or maybe Banchieri's madrigal of the same name
*Batten - any musical meaning?
*Jean Bérain: neither father nor son was apparently a musician, but Jean Bérain the Elder apparently designed for a number of ballets; this should be mentioned in the article
*Giovanni Battista Brocchi; any music?
*Capitulary; any musical content?
*Casale Monferrato has the Folkermesse; is that it?
*Douce is also French for dolce - any other meaning?
*Duport needs to be completed
*Fermo is an Italian town and canto fermo
*Foucquet; Jean Fouquet (1911) was not a musician. There was actually a whole family of them: 
*Franceschi is a disambig with no musical target. There's contemporary composer Bruno de Franceschi and songwriter Kendal Franceschi, but I doubt they are the intended target.
*Massimo; perhaps the family had a musician, or perhaps it's an obscure musical term?
*Pietro Della Valle was interested in music on his return to Italy; the article should mention it. "The rest of his life was uneventful...he had fourteen sons"; smirk
*Vitellozzo Vitelli was, I think, not the same as the one who worked with the papal choir in the mid-16th century
Can we work through these? Strike through when you've fixed one. David Brooks 03:20, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-musicians
Talk:Teen Titans (disambiguation)

message: I suggest this page be moved to Teen Titans (disambiguation) and the article about the comic be moved here in it's place.  I feel that it's far more likely for someone to be searching for the book than the video game or the movie.  A case could be made for the TV show, but I believe the ongoing nature and long running history of the book trumps the five years the show was on the air. Darquis 01:56, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page?
Category talk:Pontifical universities

message: Um, shouldn't this be :Category:Pontifical universities to match the (correct) capitalization used by the parent artice Pontifical university? Niteowlneils 03:45, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Look, there are institutions here with Pontifical charters that are institutions of higher learning but NOT universities. Should the title be changed, perhaps, to "Pontifical institutions of higher learning"?  Examples: the Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies & the Pontifical North American College.  I'm interested in your thoughts.  Best wishes, Hoktiwe (talk) 00:57, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change category name to be more accurate?