lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rider Kick

message: I just wanted to get other people's input on how some of these kicks should be classified.Guyinblack25 16:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification

message: His kick is probably one of the most different out of all the kicks. Right now it is under the Axe Kick. How I would describe it is as a front flip with a half twist (a barani) that uses the legs coming down into the landing to kick. When I hear axe kick I think of something more along the lines of Gill's kick. Any ideas on how to better classify this? Guyinblack25 16:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kamen Rider Garren

message: His kick looks very much like a traditional flying kick, but when he executes it, he practically leaps into the air and comes down on the monster from a rather high angle. Would this fall under a Drop Kick or still the regular Jump Kick? The only exception I can think of is that in the movie Final Episode, they both did it at different angles from the TV show, Ryuga was even moving upwards. Any thoughts? Guyinblack25 16:11, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kamen Rider Ryuki/Ryuga
Talk:Abol Tabol

message: what does this mean? it was added in brackets after the song?
89.242.144.141 (talk) 00:07, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ami jani tumi hagu khow)

message: what does this mean  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.242.144.141 (talk) 00:08, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: sundari baldi tumi..)

message: I have added Abol Tabol pronunciation! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 13:41, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Abol Tabol Pronuncitaion 
Talk:A'dam

message: A'dam is also the abbreviation of Amsterdam! Skafa 16:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the  tag from A'dam, which you proposed for deletion.  I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it.  If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the  template back to the article.  Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion.  Thanks! 
While I agree with you that Portal Stones and Fire Blossoms are not notable and should be deleted (I didn't even know we had articles on them, otherwise I probably would have nominated them for deletion myself, especially fire blossoms), the a'dam should not.  The a'dam are major fictional items in the Wheel of Time series that play a major role in every novel of the series after the first.  Nutiketaiel (talk) 15:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Deletion
Talk:Aliyasantana

message: Please don't revert the edit without a consensus. Vicky4197 (talk) 18:50, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: In the context of "Aliyasantana", Aliya means "son-in-law" not nephew. 2600:6C5A:517F:D3A8:A858:611E:7523:865 (talk) 13:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before reverting the edits, please have a discussion here.
Talk:Jakanachari

message: Kannada 2405:204:5002:A1D5:2503:BBA8:E6FA:BA63 (talk) 15:17, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kannada 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved as unopposed. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Jakanachari (sculptor) →  – WP:COMMONNAME for the sculptor is just "Jakanachari", and he seems to be PRIMARY. Jakanachari already redirects to this page. Ortizesp (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 October 2022 

message: Could you explain why you think this article needs expert attention?  shouldn't be used with no reason. * Pppery * it has begun... 17:32, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is poorly written. There are hardly any citations. And the content is mostly based on legends without any mention of the historicity of the person. For example, there is a lot of debate in the scholarly community on whether Jakanachari is a single person or a group of people. And whether he actually built all the hundreds of temples that are attributed to him. There are even questions about his very existence by some scholars. The article has no information on that. And it is completely based on folklore shown in popular films. A scholar on Indian history or architecture would improve the article to a great extent. And, that's the reason for adding the tag. Nikh Nori (talk) 17:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expert tag
Talk:Anne Killigrew

message: Lots of subjectivity and unsourced statements in this entry; could be improved on both counts.Ugajin 16:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: * given the issues, I would not rate this as higher than start class. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 22:06, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Symphatomimetics

message: I have removed the very short stub that was here and redirected the page to Sympathomimetics. Not sure if the redirect should exist at all as "symphatomimetic" is, as far as I can ascertain, a spelling error. However there are thousands of results on Google for the incorrect version, and further confuses the situation by offering "sympatomimetic" as an alternative but I don't think this is a real word either. Any input would be helpfulSuperAntMD 16:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Anil Chowdhury

message: The template has been removed for two reasons,
*a. Anil Chowdhury is notable, as seen by a google search here.
*b. The author of the page has not been notified, and therefore does not have a chance to respond.
Should this article be renominated, please follow these guidelines, and furthermore make sure that you "check" that the person is non-notable, and do not put such a notice because you have not heard of the person, or ignorant on the issue.130.209.6.40 17:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion Opposed
Talk:Asaf-ud-Daula

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support Here are some citations for the given (new) name  citation #1 citation #2  citation #3 Martinian  Leave a message!  22:06, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 01:44, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Military Staff Committee

message: taken from  page 340 (348 in the pdf);
Chairmen of the Military Staff Committee (2005):
January: China
February: France
March: Russian Federation
April: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
May: United States of America
June: China
July: France
August: Russian Federation
September: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
October: United States of America
November: China
December: France
if someone knows how to turn that into a self-tracking piece for the article, or otherwise wikify it into usability...Darker Dreams 16:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I came here because I was looking for a place where to put the data on the salaries of the military in the RDCongo, yet I found no chapter on the Military in the article on the RDCongo. However, I was under the assumption that one of them was to be able to protect it's population and that this was mostly done by organising a military pillar in a country.  I was looking for an article to support this latter assumption, to support creating an article on the military in the RDCongo portal, yet I keep jumping from one article to another without finding anything on the topic.  Can anybody help drilling to an article? And support creating more interlinks. Thank you.--SvenAERTS (talk) 10:08, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to the role of the military / armed forces in the member nations to the United Nations? 
Talk:Ashutosh Mukherjee

message: The quoted epitaph seems wrong. Is this the exact phrasing? has anyone seen it? It appears to be grammatically incorrect, so I want to know if it's an exact quotation or if the mistake is a transcription error.
Rimi talk 10:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  epitaph 

message: Dear Author,
Could you please change the date of birth of Sir Ashutosh? It is mentioned as 2003.
106.208.241.107 (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in date of birth
Talk:Colleen McCabe

message: In what sense is she an EX-fraudster?
:Possibly she is no longer one? --Alex (Talk) 16:38, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ayilyam Thirunal

message: Please use the Wiki naming convention--activevoid (talk) 12:25, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles)]]
Talk:The Cobra Event

message: Good job, I will help.
?Ðå¥Ê? 16:39, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Job 

message: I don't quite know how to say this in the article without making it sound awkward, but Cope did not create Cobra. He helped create it by making it affect humans. BioArk was the original creator of the Virus. --76.107.251.178 (talk) 23:35, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate info in article -- also SPOILER ALERT
Talk:Southampton F.C. Under-21s and Academy

message: I propose that Southampton F.C. Under-23s be merged into Southampton F.C. Academy, with the article also ideally renamed to Southampton F.C. Under-23s and Academy or similar to reflect both aspects of its content. 
The Under-23 side is one team within the academy setup. The fact that there are so many U-18 players on the U-23 squad list shows their close level of integration. Both have the Football academies in England category.
Both articles are also fairly weak in terms of external sources and a combined article would provide a stronger basis for demonstrating their notability for being retained in the encyclopedia. Recent discussions at WP:FOOTY have indicated that reserve and/or youth team articles which are unconvincing in terms of notability or verifiability may be considered for deletion - see here (or here if archived). I don't support any blanket removal of youth/reserve articles but I think one to cover the whole system for each club would show a more credible argument for being kept.
Merging the articles would also follow the more common model used in respect of English clubs - current exceptions being Reading (1) / (2), Charlton (1) / (2), West Ham (1) / (2), Spurs (1) / (2) and Arsenal (1) / (2) which will also have this merge suggestion applied. It would probably make it easier for interested editors to keep the current information updated if they are monitoring the same article rather than there being two articles containing overlapping information (WP:OVERLAP) being maintained separately.
PS I nominated one article to 'remain' and one to 'go' purely on the basis of which had existed longer. My intention was not to offend any editors by suggesting the article they created/maintain should be deleted due to being inferior to any other, just that I don't think any more than one article on this topic is necessary.
::I have also created a discussion on WP:FOOTY regarding these mergers here if anyone wants to make general points, counter-arguments etc. Thanks.Crowsus (talk) 13:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Portal talk:Current events/United States

message: ...This is dead... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.197.125.27 (talk • contribs) November 8, 2006 (16:42 UTC).
:Jesus. This page needs some editors who care. 204.69.40.13 21:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: dead

message: There seems to be no one here.  We'll need some type of "dedicated editor" here- I can't immerse myself here. Orngjce223 editing from 24.93.151.208 02:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've cleaned up the page and added some data. Rob110178 03:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello... 

message: Can someone explain to me the purpose of this page?  Is it really feasible to add stories by hand to this in anything like timely manner?  What is the advantage of this page over an automated service like Google News? Iluxan 04:13, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm struggling to see the purpose of this page, especially in the context of an encyclopedia.  Maybe the future people will enjoy reading a list of what the today people thought were important news stories, but even that isn't being served by this page. 84.12.142.218 12:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I doubt anyone actually uses this for news, it really has no purpose. Noobeditor (talk) 00:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Well.  Seems to be more people here nowadays.  Orngjce223 is too lazy to make an alternate account and is editing from 99.182.67.201 (talk) 19:28, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: purpose
Talk:Barua

message: Hello, editors, I added few references , Kindly do not remove edits based on these references , Thanks.--2405:204:B204:4901:30B2:8156:403:A153 (talk) 06:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please make careful judgement while changing contents, as the recent changes you have made appear to be WP:DISRUPT in nature. The article is on Barua, and therefore, the MOS:LEAD should only contain information that identifies the topic and establish context. The addition of the word Chao Phu-Ke at the start and modifying the info-box is not acceptable. That said, I have incorporated your citations to the article, however, these and anything new you wish to include should conform to WP:BESTSOURCES guidelines, failing which would result in disqualifying them under WP:NOTE and WP:FAILN norms. AnjanBorah (talk) 17:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Added
Talk:Ameriprise Financial

message: IMO, the current Criticism and controversy section, is a bit lengthy given the current body of the article. It's essentially just a laundry list of charges, settlements, etc. some of which are notable and some that aren't. Thoughts on how to best condense this section? Meatsgains(talk) 19:27, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism and controversy section
Talk:Martin Evans

message: Snowmanradio, the reduced  lead is now too short per WP:LEAD. Please add to lead to make it the appropriate length. Or I will. One of us should. In the section above on this talk page, when you asked for a start class rating, the review said that family-based information should be included in the lead.  MacDaid (talk) 11:10, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lead is now too short per [[WP:LEAD]]
Talk:Metallic dragons (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: I have no information on it but I do believe there was a D&D rule book that contained the platinum dragon. Needs specs.
Also it would be good to have expanded information on the dragons such as which rule book or expanded rule book they are shown in (or if multiple all of the books they appear in)
:The platinum dragon is Bahamut, and has his own page.  It would be cool to say which books contain which dragon's info.  Go to town. - Peregrinefisher 17:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:SWR Sound Corporation

message: SWR is definitely not a corporation anymore from a functional standpoint; it is a brand owned and manufactured by Fender. Fender certainly tries to market SWR as a self-contained unit, though it requires very little investigation to see what's really going on. However, I'm not sure how much it really proves that you didn't see a registration for it on California's or Arizona's SOS websites. Beyond the lack of legal importance, beginning a statement with "Actually, ..." is about as un-encyclopedic of a tone as you could possibly create.—Lazytiger 20:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  SWR not a corporation? 

message: The article has unsourced statements peppered throughout. 24.6.198.12 (talk) 18:48, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Scholz Research & Development, Inc.

message: I would like information about the Rockman 100 watt cabinet speakers, how many were made, their value and specs. 2604:3D08:1C79:2600:28EC:9581:FF6E:4BB7 (talk) 16:27, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rockman 100 watt cabinet speakers
Talk:Soldano Custom Amplification

message: The second paragraph of the introduction is clearly promotional material rather than encyclopaedic text, at the least most of it. I'll tag it as cleanup-spam. I cannot make a rewrite myself, since I don't know and am not interested enough in the subject. However, as a reader the paragraph immediately made the hair stand in the back of my neck, so I consider adding the tag appropriate. Matti Nuortio, Oulu, Finland (talk) 14:38, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup-spam. This article may contain promotional material and other spam.

message: As seen in the German wiki article might be good for an article. --Matthiasberoli (talk) 18:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soldano/Cornish Guitar Routing System 

message: I went looking for sources for the news that was recently added to the article, and while I haven't found much yet, I did find this article from Seattle Business Magazine that could be used as a starting point: Loving It Loud Cheers, Nettrom (talk) 14:43, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for content
Talk:Univox

message: We could use a short entry to the "amps" and "guitars" section so that it can be expanded upon in the future. Gutch220 19:06, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Sections 

message: I may remove the opening statement, For Univox portable keyboards, see Vox (musical equipment) unless someone can strongly justify it. 
Edgar Winter played a Univox Compac-Piano in the early 1970s, carrying the 21-pound "lightweight" keyboard around on a strap across his shoulders. Billy Preston (and apparently George Duke) used it as well: http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3433
This was a rebranded Crumar (Italy) keyboard, made 1972-1980 — certainly NOT Vox.
(FWIW, Winter traded out the 61-key beast for a more manageable 49-key synth remote keyboard that I've been unable to identify though it looks a little like an early Univox Korg...)  Weeb Dingle (talk) 07:17, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: needs overhaul, particularly keyboards

message: Can anyone verify that such an event happened? Current chatter on the internet wires suggests that this is an urban myth. 
--Decampos (talk) 23:53, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matsumoku Fire 

message: As much as I enjoy hearing stories from people who were actually there, it's NOT appropriate for WP. So, I'm cutting stuff like Per Frank Kosinsky, Unicord's Chief Engineer in the late 1970s, as told to Rick Reinckens, a short-term employee as unfounded hearsay and original research. Weeb Dingle (talk) 23:11, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm removing the names of individuals 

message: I'm disputing this:
::In about 1967 Unicord merged with Merson…. This new company was called "Merson Musical Products, A Division of Unicord Incorporated, A Gulf + Western Systems Company." Around 1968 they started producing Univox-brand guitars.
Back in 1974, I bought a new Univox Hi-Flier. Though I don't have it at hand, I'm moderately certain that Merson isn't mentioned on the headstock decal, though G+W might be. 
In any case, it is certainly a Matsumoku-made guitar. The section's wording leaves the impression that Merson manufactured guitars, when at very most they were an intermediary tasked with import and/or domestic distribution duties. If anyone can find definitive (e.g. Premier Guitar) article about Univox, that'd be ever so helpful!Weeb Dingle (talk) 16:34, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  timeline?
Talk:Gary Lenaire

message: States that he has "noted essays".  I honestly believe this sounds like self promotion.  Not a valid wikipedia entry, should be reworked - Iamvery.
"Noted Essays"
I have been reading Lenaire for over 10 years. I have made many "notes" of them over the years. It is very clear that there are Christians on this page trying to attack Mr. Lenaire with ridicule. This only shows the the level of ignorance they dwell in.
:Attacks with ridicule? Give me a break. I see a article with a neutral point of view. Claiming the essays as being noted without providing any sources or references would be in violation of that policy. Perhaps it is very clear that there are atheists/agnostics on this page trying to make Mr. Lenaire's recent body of work appear more groundbreaking and important then it really is.--E tac 21:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lenaire is probably writing this wikipedia entry himself.  I've read his essays.  They are nothing more then typical atheistic garbage that has been spewed out and recycled for over 50 years now.  ~~Iamvery~~ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.246.143.130 (talk) 20:00, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You know, I just read some of his stuff last week, and I 100% agree with you, however, I think it leans to skepticism rather than atheism. I ahven't read all of it but from what I've read, he seems to be a thiest with atheistic conformity (meaning, he says the same thing anyone else does). Is this article even notable? I've also wondered if his stuff is really a parody. I'm not sure, but you know, I don't find anything he has written to be notable.  IronCrow (talk) 02:30, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noted Essays? 

message: It appear that the subject is re-writing the article without any verifiable sources. All material on Wikipedia should be verifiable, especially material on living persons. Unsourced material may be deleted. Further, it is problematic to have the subject making extensive revisions without discussion.   Will Beback  talk   07:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.garylenaire.org is being added as a reference, but it redirects to a Myspace page that doesn't contain much information besides that Lenaire is male and 100 years old. In other words it's useless.   Will Beback  talk   04:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Quotations, especially from living people, need to have a reliable source. http://www.zoominfo.com/people/Lenaire_Gary_35367135.aspx does not qualify.   Will Beback  talk   04:43, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2009
Talk:Mighty Morphin Power Rangers (video game)

message: Needs to be split this is five separate games. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.164.135 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 11 February 2007
How do you split this?  There's hardly enough info. to be one article, let alone 5.
Crazycarolina 02:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I owned a game about the MMPR on the NES, I've recently been watching NES game reviews and seen that the cartriges I had were smaller, just enough to fit the memory chip thing in. It was in Japanese or Chinese or any other language that uses that sort of alphabet. So I suspect it might have been a Famicom exclusive game (I don't know much about the famicom though). 77.230.3.212 (talk) 13:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NES/Famicom game?