lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Real Milli Vanilli

message: The article states Shaw was absent from the group, while Charles Shaw (singer) states he was part of it. Dforest (talk) 01:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Is there any reason why a one-off group with almost the same name which can barely expand from its current state from lack of information isn't just a section in the main band article? It's really just a footnote in the band's history. FunkMonk (talk) 15:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Those were actually the people they lip synced off of. As shady as it was, I’d say it would be a pretty good idea to merge the two. JTZegers (talk) 20:22, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Merging this article with Milli Vanilli's is completely nonsense as they are two different groups/projects. Milli Vanilli ended in 1990 after the lip sync scandal and then The Real Milli Vanilli emerged. The articles should be separated, even though some of the same people are involved (the real singers) it's still a different group from the previous one. Different lineup, different name. The previous one got extinct. As The Real Milli Vanilli they dropped an album and some singles out of it and there's also some more information regarding this phase of the project that should be separated. Milli Vanilli info should stay in the Milli Vanilli article. The Real Milli Vanilli info can be referenced on the Milli Vanilli article but for detailed and complete info it should stay on The Real Milli Vanilli article page. Miguel098374 (talk) 13:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Then merge it with the album article. The point is, the one-off group itself is not notable on its own. FunkMonk (talk) 13:55, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes merging it with the album article makes more sense considering that the info on The Real Milli Vanilli article and on their album's article is basically the same and most of it only refers to the album, so it's really the best thing to do. I agree! Miguel098374 (talk) 19:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 10:31, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Milli Vanilli or the album
Talk:The Hands of Orlac (1924 film)

message: This article is underdeveloped, under-sourced, and only has one sources cited in the article. Considering the significance of the actual film this is unacceptable. More work needs to be done to this article with unsourced information given proper footnotes, more information on the film's reception and legacy added to those sections and an overall rewrite of the article in order to fit Wikipiedia's encyclopedic tone due to the article's poor writing. All of these changes and additions need to occur in order for this article to meet Wikipiedia's standards and guidelines of a well developed and properly sourced article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 17:57, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation and Expansion
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Australia/Newsletter/December 2007

message: Perhaps discuss the Aussie Wikimedia chapter a bit next time? Get some more members and publicity? :) ~ Riana ⁂ 01:59, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, will do! :) December will be over soon (not really, a while to go, but you know), and later on today I might start putting together January's edition. Spebi 04:31, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cool, first newsletter! :) 

message: Please remove the line break just before , in order to fix a Paragraph wrapping bug workaround lint error, which is considered a High Priority lint error. I verified in my sandbox that doing so would remove that error and also a Missing end tag error and a Stripped tags error. And while you are about it, please
change each occurrence of  to 
and each occurrence of  to 
Doing so will remove the Obsolete HTML tags error. Anomalocaris (talk) 09:32, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Partly done: I removed the line break as requested. I have also removed the protection as it seems unnecessary, has never been vandalised, is not a high profile page, and no reason for protection was given in the log. So please make the other changes yourself. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 06:04, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 13 October 2017
Talk:Golden Gate University School of Law

message: I feel that the section regarding the NYT article is not really encyclopedic content; the piece's author simply chose GGU as symtomatic on a common problem in higher education.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mochaliz (talk • contribs) 02:51, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Academic Scholarship Controversy

message: I hear that GGU Law is off ABA probation. Is this true? Can anyone validate this and add it to the main page? Someone edited the page (as seen in history) but then it was removed. Why??
Gautam  02:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Off Probation
Talk:Hillgrove High School

message: Where is the school logo? It isn't on the article's page! The world is about to end... in 2012! (talk) 02:24, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo? 

message: Article content on Wikipedia is decided by consensus.  For some categories of articles (high schools included in that), a general guideline for content has been established by consensus already.  The title of this section links to those.  Among the things that these guidelines talk about are:
# Using student names.  We don't, unless that student is considered notable (which means they would qualify to have a biographical article on Wikipedia.  That would be less than 100 students in the whole country; usually Olympic athletes.  Child stars generally do not attend school--they have tutors).
# Achievements.  The only achievements we discuss are state or national championships, with references.  Not third places, not regional competitions.
# Items of primarily local interest.  This is an encyclopedia article, not the school's webpage.  It is intended to summarize the factual information available in other sources for an audience that includes the entire English speaking world.  Do you really think someone in Brisbane or Calcutta gives a damn what play your school produced in the fall of 2011?
Please familiarize yourself with these guidelines.  Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 23:15, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:SCH/AG|school article guidelines]] 
Talk:Björn Nittmo

message: At least Ove Johansson played earlier in the NFL. --Garnichtsoeinfach (talk) 08:41, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First swedish player in NFL? 

message: Basic information to add to this article: information about his family background. 2605:A000:FFC0:5F:F9BD:9D:B97C:57D4 (talk) 04:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: I seem to recall that, as a guest on the David Letterman show, Nittmo once mentioned that he had changed his surname to Nittmo (a name he claimed to have invented) from a much more common surname, maybe Andersen, possibly as part of a cash incentive the Swedish government had set up to entice Swedish citizens to change their surnames away from very common ones. Am I remembering correctly, and is there any truth to this story? 2605:A000:FFC0:5F:F9BD:9D:B97C:57D4 (talk) 04:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname
Talk:Boyd "Red" Morgan

message: Subject's career in professional football (as Boyd Morgan) lasted a little over a year [1939–40], while his screen career (as Boyd "Red" Morgan) lasted 44 years [1940–84]. He is listed as Boyd "Red" Morgan in IMDb, AFI Catalog, TCMDb, AllMovie, TVGuide and all other references, with redirects to such occasionally billed variations as Boyd Red Morgan, Boyd 'Red' Morgan, Red Boyd Morgan, Red Morgan (actor), 'Red' Morgan or "Red" Morgan. Roles credited to Read Morgan were played by a similarly-named 16-years-younger actor (born 1931). —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 00:08, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: All references indicate [[Boyd "Red" Morgan]]
Talk:Chris Johnson (safety, born 1960)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support I am the nominator -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 03:47, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-12-10/In the news

message: "the charges have been dropped" is an inaccurate description, as it is apparently not legally possible to withdraw this kind of criminal complaint, and there hasn't been a statement from the prosecutor yet. See my remarks at User talk:Michael Snow/German Wikipedia. And to imply a causal connection to "some of the symbols are being removed" is a bit too much Schubert's POV - instead, many people attributed her withdrawal to the stiff opposition that she had to face, including from several members of her own party, and to the legal futility of the complaint.  Regards, High on a tree (talk) 02:52, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I only know about things if people report them to the tip line, Google News picks it up, or I happen to stumble across it one day. enochlau (talk) 07:10, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Right... see my link above to my report in the tip line. I just wonder if I should use it again, or is it forgotten? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  03:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I must've missed it. Sorry about that. enochlau (talk) 04:09, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No problem. I was wondering if I didn't provide enough info or if it wasn't interesting enough. Do you think we can mention this in a future edition? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  05:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'll mention it briefly in the December 17 edition that I'm writing now. enochlau (talk) 12:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Euro International school shooting

message: Perhaps this should be transwikied to Wikinews? --Eastlaw (talk) 02:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, you kind of have a point there.  --Eastlaw (talk) 03:28, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ye 2405:201:4005:C055:204E:84AF:B758:271 (talk) 07:53, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ye
Talk:Bob Latta

message: I don't know when he assumes office (probably very soon), but right now he's called a rep-elect in the text but an incumbent in the infobox. Can we make it consistent please?  Moncrief (talk) 19:32, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incumbent or not?

message: The second entry under External Links, labelled "Bob Latta for U.S. Congress campaign site," some kid (or Democrat activist, wutever) has set to go to a porn site.  I'd fix it if I knew the correct site.  There may well be other cases on this page.    Randall 75.199.46.110 (talk) 22:59, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism? 

message: I think it should be added that he is the sponsor of the bill to force the FCC to kill Net Neutrality.  I do not trust myself to be unbiased in writing that, as I can't think of any legitimate, compelling reason for him to have taken that stance.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.15.139.100 (talk) 18:41, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Net Neutrality
Talk:Mexican Movement of 1968

message: Why is this here? Can't anybody merge this with the Tlatelolco Massacre article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.146.48.34 (talk) 04:08, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "This" is here because it is a valid encyclopedia topic.  Why should it be merged into a separate article about the massacre? Viriditas (talk) 04:21, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the massacre was a result of the "Mexico 68". The Spanish version merges these two into one: Mexican Student Movement of 1968. Not to mention that the article of the Tlatelolco Massacre has more data than this one about the movement itself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.249.53.8 (talk) 19:31, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging proposal

message: Where is the evidence that anyone in English calls this episode "Mexico 68"?
There is no evidence on the page or in the working links that anyone says "México 68" in Spanish either.
It sounds like a pop group, Brazil 66, Mexico 68, Bhutan 69.
Varlaam (talk) 20:50, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The title "Mexico 68" 

message: There was a huge Black Power movment in the USA at the time. Martin Luther King was killed that year. And this article references the "hippie" movement as the main influence for Mexican students? 
A timeline woule be nice.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.172.57.191 (talk) 22:56, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hippie Movement. Really? 

message: This does not seem like a well written and documented encyclopedia article. There aren't many citations and the sources for the few citations are used repeatedly. The title doesn't help people looking for student revolutions or student movements. Chuck Baggett (talk) 22:55, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not many references. Does not feel like a well written encylopedia article. Title odd. 

message: If this isn't merged per the suggestions above, I think "Mexican Student Movement of 1968" should be the main article, and Mexico 68 turned into a redirect.  The former seems to match the Spanish article name much more closely. - GretLomborg (talk) 20:02, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have the same opinion for the article. The social process was more about a social movement, in fact, not only with students as protagonists. Best, ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 19:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
Talk:Jones Middle School

message: Just a note that it's typically very difficult for middle school articles to survive. It's a good idea to add reliable sources to this article that establish notability. Arthurrh (talk) 18:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand that Wikipedia does not commonly have articles on middle schools, but the essential goal of Wikipedia is to grow and expand with notable organizations.  Though the article is small now, when students from the middle school, teachers, and alumni begin to add to the article, it will grow and become a necessary part of Wikipedia. Locke (talk) 20:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The size isn't the issue. If you want to be sure the article survives, the best tactic is to add reliable sources to provide verifability of notability. In other words, articles from third-party sources such as newspapers, magazines, etc. Sources such as the school or district website don't help establish notability. If you have questions or need help, please ask. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 21:54, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 
Talk:Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story (soundtrack)

message: *Amid the Humor, Dewey Cox's Music is for Real --(trogga) 00:48, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite(s) for use 

message: Though I know Fischer's voice is dubbed in the movie, I wonder by whom?  I assume Reilly does his own singing.  I think this info would be relevant for the article. Originalname37 (talk) 19:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who Sings the Songs?
Talk:The Aqueduct

message: I've been able to find where this is apparently taught in educational institutions, but I'm unable to tell how widely it's actually taught. Coverage for this is fairly light as a whole, so notability is in question here. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Smith Point Light

message: http://www.gutenberg.org/files/44188/44188-h/44188-h.htm#page_255 76.117.247.55 (talk) 05:04, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subjective account of construction given here 
Talk:Aunt Harriet Cooper

message: I remember a collection of Batman short stories published in paperback form; in one Aunt Harriet is stabbed to death by an intruder. Traumatic. I'll try and track it down; I want to reread the stories anyway. It's an insane book, canon is gleefully ignored. Lots42 (talk) 03:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Short Stories

message: The one main characteristic of Aunt Harriet missing from the description is that if Aunt Harriet liked something or was interested in some kind of fad - every time this fad or something had to do with the bad guys.  Aunt Harriet's involvement was more consistently related to something being a front for the bad guys than a divining stick is related to a source of water.  13:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Aunt Harriet and Fads

message: Fixed a word no one cared enough to notice in almost a year.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.26.184.110 (talk) 11:10, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aunt Agatha
Talk:Gonzalo García (footballer, born 1987)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 01:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 11:31, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 June 2021
Talk:Teen drama

message: I'd recommend merging this article into soap opera, as I don't think any "teen drama" can exist without being considered a soap. 
67.84.253.86 (talk) 23:50, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes it a subgenre if anything. OrangeAipom (talk) 08:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with soap operas? 

message: I've moved the history section to the United States section because it's only a history of teen dramas in the U.S. so I think it makes more sense to be there. I've also created a Teen dramas by country new section heading because that's what that was starting to look like anyway and that way it's easier to add information about teen dramas in other countries. If someone doesn't agree with my changes, feel free to change it back, but I think this is a better structure for the article. I'll leave a note at WikiProject Television asking for opinions and help to source the article. --Cattus talk 19:27, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganizing sections

message: This article needs to be written, and I strongly suggest that Teen film is merged into this article. IAmTheCoinMan (talk) 00:12, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: I'd strongly disagree with the notion that it only emerged as a genre in the 90s. There are numerous examples of drama made for a teenage audience from the 70s and 80s; I can primarily think of those in the science-fiction genre, that being my main interest, but a common theme is the development of moral attitude and an exploration of revolution.
Weren't dramedies of the 70's, e.g. Happy Days or What's Happening!!, predecessors to later teen dramas with one significant difference? The 70's shows often reflected segregated, working class white or black environments. But the post-Reagan era cultivated a view of white upper-middle class or wealthy lifestyles for a large swath of their teen characters in a romanticized base. People of color, particularly black or Hispanic, were excluded or given secondary token characters when allowed to portray a teen in these areas of luxury, privilege and power.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.10.219.165 (talk) 01:40, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Glutaredoxin

message: Previous text was not very clear to me, so I replaced it completely. If you disagree, please feel free to correct me.Biophys (talk) 04:03, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: NADPH isn't a glutaredoxin cofactor, but apart from that it reads fine. Tim Vickers (talk) 06:07, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:KMER

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the code reference to an airport is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the airport. - Dravecky (talk) 03:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Last Blood (webcomic)

message: "THIS COMIC IS NOT OVER AND NEW PAGES WILL CONTINUE TO RUN ON THIS SITE STARTING VERY SOON! ALSO, TO THOSE OF YOU WHO ARE SOMEHOW WONDERING, THERE IS ZERO VODKA IN THOSE BOTTLES, NONE, NO VODKA!"
--Last Blood—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.40.147.241 (talk) 04:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the new comic is starting with events in the past in black and white and 'current' events in color.  About 4 comics are up so far with Addison talking to an unknown female.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.125.235.35 (talk) 18:16, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  new comic 

message: Why is this proposed for deletion -- no rationale is given.  The webcomic is fairly popular, has been turned into a comic book, and optioned for a movie.  I can link to an online article about it if notability proofs are required.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.71.82.82 (talk) 02:15, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Edward Fenlon

message: I have seen Political Graveyard Listing his birthyear as 1905. I do have some my own databases that include his current birth year as 1903 (Public index Records). I have found as from one of the articles that was dated in April of 2005 listing his Age as 101 thus making his birth year in 1903 if his birth is later in year (Oct 7). Im currently trying to get a hold of his birth Certificate to be Absolutely Sure.. Besides having the article and the info i have from 1920 Census and 1910 Census Records Im able to access
--Thomas (talk) 04:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1905?
Talk:Suicide and evolution

message: Article needs work: only focuses on one researcher, tone is not encyclopedic, some sections are repeated.
I've always thought depression and subsequent suicide were forms of altruism, the results of kin selection.  An animal becomes depressed and lethargic when rejected by peers or potential mates, and puts up less of a fight against predation.  In doing so, the animal protects its kin from predators and removes its (inferior) self from competition for resources.  As such, animals don't really have opportunities for suicide unless they have no natural predators, like man.  Article should definitely cover suicide in animals, if it exists. — Omegatron 04:10, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:NSW Council for Civil Liberties

message: I entered this page because there were other pages that had the NSWCCL as a link but there was no information about them, so I went to their website to find some copy.   Sorry I did not realise this was forbidden.   I have now changed the text and put it in my own words.   Rozziew (talk) 04:12, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:CyberCIEGE

message: The words are not copyrighted.  They were produced as work for the US Government and cannot be copyrighted.  The summary is from www.cisr.nps.edu/cyberciege.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kesterel (talk • contribs) 04:12, 12 December 2007
:Unless the text has been clearly released into the public domain, we cannot reuse it at Wikipedia. Government websites are not automatically public domain. --McGeddon (talk) 10:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)