Talk:Baudline

message: the article doesnt make clear that baudline is closed source but free.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.66.246.43 (talk) 05:16, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The main article does say the license is proprietary but there isn't a place in the wiki Infobox for the cost of free. I'm not sure it is allowed to discuss price in the wiki context. Audiocow (talk) 19:36, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: free

message: Baudline has a user group / mailing list that anyone can join at groups.google.com/group/baudline
Is the proper place for this user group link here on this discussion page or in the External Links section of the main article page? (Baudline 19:54, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: User Group

message: Can a program released under GPL, be payed for the source?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.37.189.66 (talk • contribs) 
:The wording of your question doesn't make sense.  But if you meant, "Can a person pay money in exchange for the source of a program released under the GPL?", then the answer is yes. Pricing policy is not restricted by the GPL. --Ds13 18:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically they are saying that the proprietary binary has a different set of rights than the GPL source code.    Spectrogram 18:27, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I'm sorry, but that's not dual licensing. Dual licensing is when you release a piece of software with a copyright statement that says "here, have this software under either license A o B, it's up to you". And this is NOT it. W2bh 20:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  What you just described, A or B, is a dual license for license compatibility purposes. Qt uses a different dual license model which is the same A or B choice but B costs money. The Wikipedia dual license page also has a proprietary works section which mentions segregating users into groups.  So that's three examples of different dual licensing models and it is possible that there are even more variations. Spectrogram 23:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The baudline source code can be purchased under a couple of different licenses.  Purchase the GPL source code and you can distribute the source and binaries by the terms of the GPL.  Purchase the source code with a proprietary license and you need to follow those specific distribution terms. Different licenses with different terms for different goals and purposes. (Baudline 17:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Ok. No response from the Baudline developer. Having spoken to developers from other distributions and done some research on this, I have to conclude that there is no GNU GPL version of this software available. I've updated the article to reflect this. --IainLearmonth (talk) 16:32, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've also removed Baudline from the Comparison of free software for audio page as it doesn't belong there being not "free and open source". --IainLearmonth (talk) 22:36, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: License

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Baudline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111127113239/http://www.medienwissenschaft.hu-berlin.de/medientheorien/forschung/downloads/hausarbeiten/em-sniffer.pdf to http://www.medienwissenschaft.hu-berlin.de/medientheorien/forschung/downloads/hausarbeiten/em-sniffer.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:16, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This link moved, wasn't entirely dead, so I've updated it to the new URL. IainLearmonth (talk) 16:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Baudline. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101207132741/http://www.linux.org/apps/AppId_8213.html to http://www.linux.org/apps/AppId_8213.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100615210240/http://seclab.uiuc.edu/pubs/LeMayT06.pdf to http://seclab.uiuc.edu/pubs/LeMayT06.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706224354/http://sysdoc.doors.ch/CREATIVE/oggVorbis.pdf to http://sysdoc.doors.ch/CREATIVE/oggVorbis.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:58, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Whomever is in charge of establishing official links, please add a link to their official Twitter page, since a bot removed my submission.
== Infobox software template ==
Has the Infobox software template been deprecated?  I can't change the release versions or remove invalid parts of it. Spot51 (talk) 00:17, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: = Added Link of Official Twitter Page: https://www.twitter.com/baudline/ but some bot removed it 

message: Has the Infobox software template been deprecated?  I can't change the release versions or remove invalid parts of it. Spot51 (talk) 00:17, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox software template