Talk:Genie Engine

message: :Image:Age of empires.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:47, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. dihydrogen monoxide (H20) 10:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed, not to mention the hordes of unsourced allegations. Tolkien fan (talk) 02:47, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Age of empires.jpg

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 21 October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:45, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Magna-Graecia-Redux-1600x1200.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Genie Engine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081013144438/http://www.microsoft.com/games/empires/behind_dave.htm to http://www.microsoft.com/games/empires/behind_dave.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081013144438/http://www.microsoft.com/games/empires/behind_dave.htm to http://www.microsoft.com/games/empires/behind_dave.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070922104639/http://www.bighugegames.com/press_rongoldships.shtml to http://www.bighugegames.com/press_rongoldships.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: At this time, the Usage section appears to be a completely subjective view of the engine. It has no references and provides primarily details like "In general, the engine is easy to use" and "it is nearly impossible for a human to effectively counter," which aren't very helpful for readers. In addition, I suspect that many of the comments are based only on a single game that uses the Genie Engine. One reason I suspect this is the discussion of the AI, which is as far as I can tell, is not generic to the Genie Engine. Also, the Genie engine was used for a Star Wars video game while this section discusses specifically cavalry and catapults.
Also, I would guess that a Usage section on a game engine should be focused on the developers using the game engine, not players of the game. However, there appears to be very little information to write about on the developers using the engine.
Based on this, I would suggest that the Usage section be removed from the page, since it provides subjective and likely irrelevant information, both of which don't belong in an Encyclopedia like Wikipedia.
Gbear605 (talk) 05:02, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage Section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Genie Engine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6ALL17oAN?url=http://www.gamerevolution.com/review/age-of-empires to http://www.gamerevolution.com/oldsite/games/pc/strategy/ageofempires.htm
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6ALL9x4Qn?url=http://au.gamespot.com/cossacks-european-wars/reviews/cossacks-european-wars-review-2702187/ to http://au.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/cossackseuropeanwars/review.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified