lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Blackburn Beverley

message: The Blackburn B-107 article really should be merged into this one I think, as both the B-107 and B-107A covered stubbishly there were unbuilt variants of the Beverley. - The Bushranger Return fireFlank speed 22:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I'd favour a guideline that unbuilt, paper or unflown versions of flown aircraft should normally be covered only on the "home" page. Readers are more likely to find them there, where they are seen in context.  Blackburn B-107 could always have a redirect to Blackburn Beverley.TSRL (talk) 08:55, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

text: Merge not really enough content available for this unbuilt proposal for a sensible stand-alone article.Nigel Ish (talk) 10:12, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge, as noted above un-built paper variants of production aircraft do not warrant their own articlesPetebutt (talk) 13:57, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge, as noted aboveDirk P Broer (talk) 14:00, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge as I proposed same on B-107 page.BGinOC (talk) 22:06, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Empty weight: 79,234 lb (35,950 kg)
Loaded weight: 82,100 lb (37,240 kg)
Really? It could carry under 3,000 lbs of cargo and fuel? Seems a little sad, given the four Centaurus engines...
I realize this is some weird definition, but I can't find that definition anywhere on the wiki. One can hunt about in Google to find it specified only in the template documentation, which isn't terribly useful. This definition states it is "The weight of the aircraft when loaded for a 'typical' mission". I find it very difficult to believe this aircraft ever flew with less than 3,000 lbs of crew and fuel - I'd be surprised if it managed that during taxi tests.
Maury Markowitz (talk) 02:10, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: MTOW is 135,000 lbs which gives a load of about 53,000 lbs, I suspect loaded weight is just crew and equipment. MilborneOne (talk) 10:58, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, I suspect a similar definitional slight-of-hand, but I can't imagine what it might be. The crew of 6 doesn't do it, and equipment IS included in empty weight. Perhaps this number adds nothing but confusion and should simply be removed? Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:36, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Payload is 50,000 lb - see here:   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.247.9 (talk) 20:18, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umm, I think this is wrong...
Talk:Alfredo Lim

message: This article is connected to category 'Chinese filipinos', yet there is no indication of Chinese descent in the article.  Can someone find the facts and correct the article textgor delete the category, based on the facts.  Thanks Hmains 02:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I did add Lim's confrontation with PNP on Mendiola opening and the opening of Avenida.
--Florentino floro 06:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mendiola and Open Avenida

message: The criticism section is non-existant. Anyone important who does anything will be criticised, this article could do with some points organising into such a section.
--Lukestanley (talk) 08:59, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism / controversies section 
Talk:Blackburn Firebrand

message: the aircraft could only reach 32 mph below Blackburn's estimated maximum speed of 390 mph. Replacement of the Sabre II with a Sabre III (an engine built specifically for the Firebrand) improved its top speed to 358 mph; erm 358 + 32 = 390. Typo? Keith-264 (talk) 21:32, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a copy of the source given, I shall have to check it. GraemeLeggett (talk) 09:06, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Animal rights

message: An early advocate of animal welfare, any help expanding the article would be appreciated. Psychologist Guy (talk) 20:45, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Guru Jambheshwar]]

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council § Determining the future of B-class checklists.  This project is being notified since it is one of the 82 WikiProjects that opted to support B-checklists (B1-B6) in your project banner. DFlhb (talk) 11:24, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Determining the future of B-checklists

message: *David Mellor 
*Liz Mullineauxm, veterinary surgeon 
*Pierre Le Neindre (author of Interacting with Animals: Understanding their Behaviour and Welfare) 
*Alick Simmons (author of Treated Like Animals: Improving the Lives of the Creatures We Own, Eat and Use )
*Dr Sean Wensley, Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons (author of Through a Vet's Eyes: How to Care for Animals and Treat Them Better)
I will work on these in the next few months.
Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Animal welfare scientists that need articles
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Sorcery 101

message: * Comment: I'm holding off my vote, but I must note that there is a constant dispute over Dragonfiend's rather strict interpitation over WP:V.  The whole area seems to fly in the face of Wikipedia:Assume good faith over Dragonfiend's actions -- not against Keenspot personel, but against fellow Wikipedia editors and Wikipedia Webcomic section editors.  I have reviewed all of Dragonfiend's comments, and his own user account, and now belive he would be better served in a section that did not deal with works of fiction.  Or, in order to take the extreme view of Dragonfiend, All webcomics violate WP:V because Encarta and Encyclopedia Brittanica does not have an entry for "webcomics".  STrRedWolf 02:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Well in a sad turn of events, if wikipedia is going to be so ignorant as to refuse to define something, when its their business... then I'm going to have to crush them. There being hippocritical, and I hate hippocrits... so in conclusion, down with over governing powers blah blah blah and all that jazz. Woot
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.133.156.200 (talk • contribs) 
Comment: I must say that the ones that dragonfiend mentioned are only the select group of very well known webcomics. We have articles on more arbitrary subjects than a pretty well known webcomic. -Arsenic- 21:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiki you're a judgemental one, aren't you
Talk:Miriam Quiambao

message: This article is connected to category 'Chinese filipinos', yet there is no indication of Chinese descent in the article.  Can someone find the facts and correct the article textgor delete the category, based on the facts.  Thanks Hmains 02:57, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article contains a lot of point of view statements withno supporting information such as "...she managed to pull quite a classy comeback by calmly and quickly collecting herself with such grace and elegance..."
--Whpq 14:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please feel free to clean up the article and, where necessary, remove any unreferenced POV.  This is an encyclopedia, not a fansite, and your contributions will be appreciated. --After Midnight 0001 03:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Bob Wynn

message: Fellow golf editors - Details needed to help fill out this article:
* Place of birth Xenia, Ohio
* Early years - how he got started playing golf Graduated Xenia High School in 1958
Lived his early years in Xenia, Ohio and played and honed his golf skills at the 
Xenia Country Club, Xenia, Ohio
* College experience
* Other regular career wins, other senior wins, amateur wins, international wins
--Hokeman 02:59, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Steam generator

message: Should this article be merged with boiler? —Mulad (talk) 20:19, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
Isn't a steam generator a device which uses a mixture of hydrogen, oxygen and water as a compact and responsive means of generating steam? Gordon Vigurs 12:12, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I will convert this to a Broad-concept article as requested in the "dabconcept" tag. Biscuittin (talk) 17:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Just don't overlap the steam generators used for carriage heating in diesel locomotives. Those share the name, but little else. Likewise the HP steam-LP steam auxiliary boilers on ships. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Please give me your definition of "Steam generator". Biscuittin (talk) 17:55, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a Google search for "Steam generator" and most of the hits were for domestic appliances like steam irons, steam cleaners and steam wallpaper strippers. Biscuittin (talk) 18:55, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Volume of imprecise use is no guide to a correct and precise use. The "billion flies" argument. The point of one article here is to be a disambiguation page: a linguistic disambiguation between similar words with obviously distinct meanings, i.e. the function and method of those machines. Another page needs to explain the underlying concept of "the steam generator concept", even if this is the most obscure use of the term "steam generator". Other articles, such as flash steam need to explain that there's remarkably little to that narrow concept, because most uses of it were themselves inaccurate (apart from Serpollet and model boats, nearly every "flash steam" device was actually a monotube). Andy Dingley (talk) 11:53, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   Broad-concept article 

message: This article duplicates Steam generator (boiler) so I will change it to a redirect. Biscuittin (talk) 10:31, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on the comments here, I disagree that there should be a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT or even a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC if there seems to be an issue if there should be a broad-concept article. There also seems to be ambiguity between the titles Steam generator (boiler) and Boiler (steam generator). Zzyzx11 (talk) 18:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Building engineering education

message: I'm not sure I buy into this definition of a "building engineer". I have worked in the industry for a long time, in Canada and in Europe, and have never heard of the definition presented in this article. I have the following comments: Firstly, it reads like a promo for a university programme (perhaps Concordia?). Second, here in Canada there is no such accreditation as a "building engineer", which is ironic given the promo is from Concordia (I do recognize there is the "architectural engineer" in some parts of the US, but I dont get that either- see talk:architectural engineering). The curriculum, as described in the article, is very much for that of a generalist, which makes me wonder what a graduate can actually specialize in since further training may be necessary. A career for the modern world? Not likely in this complex construction environment where specialists are required from everything from code equivalencies to building envelope. No one can do it all. A discipline for the modern world? No, it already exists (and has for ages)... it appears much like that of the architect, but without the emphasis on design studio. What is the point?? Having said that, I'm not trying to burst anybody's bubble- it looks like a great undergraduate degree for further study in engineering or architecture.  Mariokempes 03:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved the article to appropriate new heading- Building engineering now redirects to AE. Mariokempes 00:55, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not convinced
Wikipedia talk:Association of Members' Advocates/Message board/August 2006

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the election. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the election poll was Steve was elected as the Coordinator. -Royalguard11(Talk)(Desk) 02:13, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Tally is 10/0/0 as of 17:25, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:The Thadman|The Thadman (Steve)]]

message: # Æon Insane Ward 03:19, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: Tally is 0/2/1 as of 19:21, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Pedant|Pedant]] 

message: #Oppose this user does not seem particularly qualified or eager to do the job.  I get the impression he wouldn't make a very good figurehead for our group. User:Pedant 05:43, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose

message: #. Neutral Already voted for Steve and feel that Pendant doesn't really want the job. Æon Insane Ward 19:20, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral
Talk:Pan Zhang

message: :Speedy moved. --- Dralwik|Have a Chat  My "Great Project"
*chuckles* Although this page seems dead, I searched the net and found a bit about his origins. I'll try and continue this article, finishing off his notable feats, and such. 74.12.8.15 23:08, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:The Needles (disambiguation)

message: This page needs to exist "As is".  People who refer to "The Needles" really needs a separate disambiguation page.  Fiddle Faddle 15:22, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :The Needles (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#The Needles (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 17:06, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Needles (Disambiguation)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Needles and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Needles until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 17:07, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Needles" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:George Ty

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 17:24, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: This article is connected to category 'Chinese filipinos', yet there is no indication of Chinese descent in the article.  Can someone find the facts and correct the article text or delete the category connection, based on the facts.  Thanks Hmains 03:36, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Rico Yan

message: cheesy ng article, parang host writer ng libro ni Rico Yan nagsulat. a cringey pos  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.144.196.28 (talk) 01:17, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

message: He's grandfather from his dad's side is chinese. YAN is a chinese filipino last name. His mother is Filipino, his dad is chinese-filipino.
But does it matter if he is a Chinese descent written in his profile? Since he is also a Filipino descent as well.
This article is connected to category 'Chinese filipinos', yet there is no indication of Chinese descent in the article.  Can someone find the facts and correct the article text or delete the category connection, based on the facts.  Thanks Hmains 03:37, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The cause of death is currently unsourced, and as per the template documentation shouldn't be included unless significant to notability - there's no indication that is the case here. Please stop restoring that parameter. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:35, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Whether an autopsy was done or not is not the determining factor in whether the determined cause is included. If it's documented, it should be cited in the article body; it should only be included in the infobox if you can demonstrate that it is significant to notability. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:00, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for adding a source in the article body; however, as your edits do not address the issue of significance, it still should be left out of the infobox. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:33, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you'd like to make an argument in favour of adding the parameter in the hopes of gaining consensus for it, this talk page is the best place to do that. Since you are aware that your addition is disputed, please don't continue to reinstate your edit without engaging here. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:23, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death cause
Talk:Titus Tatius

message: I've undertaken a (much needed, imho) overhaul of the Romulus and Remus article and it has begun to sprawl badly.  So, I'm going to use some of the work in other, appropriate articles, including this one.  Please be on the lookout for any incongruity that I might have missed.  Informata ob Iniquitatum (talk) 00:30, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion with details from Dionysius, Livy and Plutarch
Talk:Jose Mari Chan

message: This article is connected to category 'Chinese filipinos', yet there is no indication of Chinese descent in the article.  Can someone find the facts and correct the article text or delete the category connection, based on the facts.  Thanks Hmains 03:44, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese filipinos category
Talk:English personal pronouns

message: I've been unable to find any evidence that these are real words.  A quick Google search turned up two instances: this page, and a thread on WordReference.com, discussing whether it is a word (apparently with consensus in the negative).  Marking it cite needed for the present.  Can a more knowledgeable linguist remove these references or provide more information? Phildonnia (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whomself / Whoself 

message: Although largely obsolete, it remains the unique 2nd person singular pronoun in English, in addition to "you"'s estabilishment as the 2nd person pronoun but in the singular form. I do not possess a tangible source to assert "thou" and derivates as being frequently used in informal and formal modern english alike, however I believe it is worthy of a mention in a pronouns chart. I merely do not know how to assemble a chart in Wikipedia, my humblest apologies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.90.37.136 (talk) 13:41, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "thou" pronoun
Talk:Australian contribution to the 1991 Gulf War

message: A little list-like. Could use some more prose, although overall a good start. Carom 05:16, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: For consistency with other Australian military history articles I propose this article be moved/renamed to Military history of Australia during the 1991 Gulf War. Similar articles on World War I, World War II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War all follow this naming convention. Anotherclown (talk) 23:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The article on the Iraq War should also be moved. Nick-D (talk) 07:29, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move/rename of article 

message: Was doing some research on Operation Damask. Is the numbering and dates of the operations wrong? The first three (Damask I, II and III) seem to be correct, but it seems as though the dates for Damask IV are wrong. Since there were more Damask Operations, should we list each Damask operations? Also found evidence that Sydney was involved in Operation Damask IV, but its deployment was in 1991. I think the Damask section needs a touch up. 
Damask V on this page: http://www.navy.gov.au/hmas-darwin-part-two
Sydney in Damask IV on this page: http://www.navy.gov.au/hmas-sydney-iv-part-2
Other Damask Operations on this page: http://www.vrb.gov.au/service_eligibility/inst83b.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tawdaya (talk • contribs) 03:21, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, thanks for your work on improving this article. As the Operation Damask article redirects to this article, it probably does make sense to include all iterations here; but I don't usually work on naval history so I could be wrong. Re the dates - do you have a source that specifically states the dates for the deployment, or are you just going on the dates of when Sydney arrived and departed and extrapolating? I suspect that there might be some fudge factor here between the official dates of the operation and the dates when the vessel actually arrived and departed, but I could well be wrong. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:26, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Damask operations wrong 

message: Other military history articles have infoboxes. Do you think this article should have one? If so, how would this manifest?Tawdaya (talk) 01:57, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, I would suggest that it might be done in a manner similar to Operation Okra and Military history of Australia during the Vietnam War. I would suggest using . Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 02:24, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding an Infobox?
Talk:Going Overboard

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 15:52, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants/Archive1

message: Hi, Teun Spaans! I noticed you put some information in the Nederlands article. Could you please take a look and add things I missed to the English one. Thank you! Iorsh 07:27, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Ericales]] in NL wikipedia

message: I'm trying to upgrade Ragwort to an example article, as asked by User:Phyzome. I am still busy I dont know if I'll be able to complete it this weekend. TeunSpaans 09:09, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Example

message: I'm working on descriptions of the orders of flowering plants. The scope of the work includes only the orders recognized by the APG II. Described so far:
:Laurales, Liliales, Alismatales, Poales, Ericales, Asterales, Geraniales, Cucurbitales, Malvales.
Since my English is far from being perfect, everybody is welcome to read and correct the articles. Iorsh 11:48, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Orders of flowering plants

message: It seems obvious that many plant stubs have been forgotten in the Biology stubs due to not changing  to . I will be looking further into this and try to switch a few to animal and plant stubs (I already found Mulleins, Flaxes and there are certainly more)--Circeus 19:50, Jan 28, 2005 (UTC)
I've changed Alkanet to  from .
Chilepine 22:26, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forgotten plant stubs