lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1965 Palm Sunday tornado outbreak

message: This tornado is overlooked and is one of the worst tornadoes to happen in illinois Wakaking (talk) 21:10, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  What do you mean it is “overlooked”. The article has an entire section for the tornado. See 1965 Palm Sunday tornado outbreak#Lakewood–Crystal Lake–Burtons Bridge–Island Lake, Illinois. Elijahandskip (talk) 06:27, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a reason for creating an article, especially if there is adequate coverage in an existing article. TornadoLGS (talk) 01:12, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crystal lake f4 tornado
Talk:Fancy cancel

message: As length was a primary contributor to the loss of FA status, ideas to flesh this out include a discussion of ink colors (including why some inks are substantially less common), and, most notably, a discussion of the markings of the New York Foreign Mail, which are well-known, distinctive, and entirely lacking from the article at current. Serpent's Choice 11:28, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Herman Dooyeweerd

message: Re: ==Studies== * Jonathan Chaplin, Herman Dooyeweerd: Christian Philosopher of State and Civil Society (Notre Dame, 2011).
* Paul Otto, "In the twilight of Dooyeweerd's Corpus: The Publishing History of In the Twilight of Western Thought and the Future of Dooyewerd Studies." Philosophia Reformata 70, no. 1 (2005): 23-40.
:This is not the best title for this section; if the article is at least in part based on these two works "Sources" would be better, and if not then "Further reading".--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be renamed "Further Reading" for now, since most of the citations come from pages on Basden's Dooyeweerd Pages. Only when the article is further developed with references to and quotes from other authors should we name the section "Sources and Further Reading" (or something along those lines). Mumford7 (talk) 19:21, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Studies" 

message: He is mentioned only in the lead and nowhere else in the article. If he is relevant a little background information would be useful, also verifying whether this spelling, rather than "Almassy" or "Almasy", is correct.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 20:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Von Alamassy" 

message: I thought I'd mention I am currently working on a Dooyeweerd bibliography, with links and all: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-ygY6TO4NJ2dBtgacF_jOdTzWpseFPlb8L3XuD4taRk/edit?usp=sharing. --Mumford7 (talk) 19:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted the document listed above since my discovery of a 1977 bibliography prepared by L.D. Derksen, A.M. Petersen, and A.J. van Dijk. Mumford7 (talk) 23:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: There have been quite a few critiques of Dooyeweerd's philosophy, many of them written in the late 20th century. Here's a link to my (working) bibliography of them: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Y1a-w-6WEzBMe5zJLC2xfR__jDiFXypwqVwyA9dY0zE/edit?usp=sharing. --Mumford7 (talk) 19:26, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critiques
Talk:Pink Floyd

message: Broken out into a separate section to make it easier to find, because it's not in the main flow of the conversation above TSP (talk) 09:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: * While I have expressed views on this before, I am bored of the subject now, have said everything I want to, and would rather look at more interesting things such as just what exactly is my favourite live version of "Careful With That Axe, Eugene". Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:49, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree, I don't think there is any significant accuracy dispute here. The question is basically just one of interpretation - exactly what does "active" mean for a band? We don't need an article tag every time there is a talk page discussion. TSP (talk) 17:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

text: I'm digging the Pompeii version this evening. The deepest version. 174.233.16.142 (talk) 23:03, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the dispute tags, per this conversation.  As I said in my edit summary, it's not really accurate to say "The factual accuracy of part of this article is disputed." The facts aren't at issue, the dispute is one of definitions - what constitutes "active" for a rock band? - and it's not helpful to casual readers to suggest the article might contain significant factual errors. TSP (talk) 09:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute tags 

message: In Preceding the band we have:  "In 1964, as Metcalfe and Noble left to form their own band..." and "Noble and Metcalfe left the Tea Set in late 1963...". Both statements are cited to the same source - Mark Blake's Comfortably Numb. One of the statements is likely to be a typing error. SilkTork (talk) 11:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Blake, page 41: "The arrival of guitarist Bob Klose [...] in the summer of 1964 proved timely. [...] His arrival prompted Clive Metcalfe and Keith Noble to return to working as a duo." Noble and Metcalfe are not mentioned on pages 42-44. (ISBN 978 0306 81752 6) Mark in wiki (talk) 12:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone with Nick Mason who says Sept 1963. SilkTork (talk) 12:36, 14 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Fixed. Povey says 1964. I think there was a misreading of the source, because Barrett started studying in Cambridge in 1962. SilkTork (talk) 12:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noble and Metcalfe left in 63 or 64? 

message: There are a suspiciously large number of references to this person's solitary article on the band (which, judging by the quotations, is utter twaddle). 176.85.135.155 (talk) 00:31, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jere O'Neill Surber Overdrive
Talk:Irish theatre

message: I'd like to put this article on the main page in the next few days, but the summary at the top is wholly inadequate. Could someone expand the introduction (preferably using News style, but Summary style is also accepable). →Raul654 23:24, Sep 19, 2004 (UTC)
:Done. Filiocht 09:49, 20 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Main page request

message: I wonder whether it is right to call Congreve an Irish playwright. He was born in England, and as far as I know, none of his ancestors were Irish. The fact that he grew up in Ireland does not make him Irish. --Tamas 09:40, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Congreve Irish

message: Most of this article is taken up with accounts of Irish-born playwrights whose plays were successful on the English stage. This does not represent Irish Theatre. There are a few paragraphs on Irish theatre in the 20th century at the end, which need expansion. I suggest moving the playwrights out of this article to a new article and placing the emphasis on Irish theatre (writers, producers, actors, etc.) as it developed in the late 19th and early 20th century. Hohenloh  +   14:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is unbalanced 

message: I have added a section on theatre in the Irish language, which shows consistent vitality against the odds. The previous suggestion, the way, has merit, though years have passed since it was made.
Colin Ryan (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish language
Talk:Montparnasse

message: I've included a photo of modern Montparnasse. I think it's appropriate that the article should deal with the contemporary aspects of Montparnasse, which are actually fairly far from the cliché of accordion music and starving artists of yore. David.Monniaux 08:46, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: I just took this picture off the page because I couldn't figure out how to write a decent caption for it, and the primary reason I couldn't write one is I couldn't figure out how the map helps the article.  (A good caption would explain that.)  Yes, I know it's a road map of the area, but I don't know where anything is on the map (except the labeled roads), and I don't learn anything from the map except that there's an inconvenient intersection in the middle of the map.  Please feel free to put the picture back with a suitable caption.  Some relatively new guidelines may be found at Wikipedia:Captions. -- ke4roh 01:16, Aug 22, 2004 (UTC)
Does train wreck at Montparnasse have a home on this page? --Mainstreetmark 13:05, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captions 
Talk:Britannia (Ultima)

message: Is it ok to add more information about the cities, towns and locations (dungeons, etc)?
Something like how they've changed over the different game periods, etc?
Shrumster 06:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be awesome. --Sydius 15:48, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More location information? 

message: Sosaria and Moongate should be merged into this article. Those articles are very short and do not establish the notability that is required for a Wikipedia article. The information would be better presented in this article. Pagrashtak 01:19, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merges
Talk:Philip Bußmann

message: From vfd:
*Philip Bussmann - vanity page? RickK 00:09, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ronald Melzack

message: I am the copyright holder of the text for Ronald Melzack which resides on my website www.science.ca as you have discovered. 
I've never contributed to Wikipedia before, but I love what you are doing. I happened to be searching for Ronald Melzack's address (homepage) and I found it at McGill, but in the process I found a listing for Melzack at Wikipedia that contained no content, so I copied the content from my own page.
I give permission for Wikipedia to use this content on the Wikipedia site. Will there be a recognition of the origin of this information at www.science.ca?
----
Your comment here serves as a recognition.  Items in Talk pages are never deleted, though they may be archived.  Do note that by the nature of Wikipedia, your item may be edited, possibly heavily.  Can you give us a name to identify you by?  RickK 23:13, 15 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Re the first sentence of the lede, presumably he was professor before he was emeritus professor, and the former is a more significant role? "John Doe is emeritus professor" makes sense but once Professor Doe is dead it becomes an odd detail to include. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 00:02, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emeritus professor
Talk:1904

message: [See: Talk:1950#Format.  -Wikid77 14:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 
Talk:English (programming language)

message: I've added a link to tne Jargon File entry, which is something, albeit not much. (Can someone reformat it into the proper layout please?)
dictionary.die.net refers to "Exploring the Pick Operating System", J.E. Sisk et al, Hayden 1986. Does anyone have access to this book? If so, it'd be a good reference.
Rosuav (talk) 06:53, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Sounds more like the Urban Legend of h*ckdom. ... said: Rursus (mbork³) 08:32, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Urban legend?
Talk:1980 United States presidential election

message: As the title suggests, he only won 6.6 percent of the vote and didn’t make Reagan loose any states. Qutlooker (talk) 00:43, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: By American historical standards, 6.6 percent was a substantial showing for an independent candidate for POTUS (as compared to, say, Barry Commoner). It has been suggested that he helped split the anti-Reagan vote, not that he made Reagan lose any states. I think he definitely should stay. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

text: He should definitely stay. After all, he was in one of the debates (with Reagan).Rja13ww33 (talk) 17:02, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

text: All Wiki Boxs for elections in the USA show canidates with above 5% of the vote, he also was very influential and competed in the debates Flogdafrog (talk) 04:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we still’s have John Anderson in the Infobox? 

message: People won't always read the linked source.2601:447:4100:1BE0:E059:C871:9CA2:2686 (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is necessary to have that level of detail. Also (something I didn't mention in my edit summary), I think the way the addition was phrased was not NPOV. So that killed two birds with one stone. Rja13ww33 (talk) 21:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it relates to the reason why Ted Kennedy was vulnerable in the 1980 election. The incident was not a typical controversy, but one that involved controversially taking a human life. That would very likely turn off voters.2601:447:4100:1BE0:E059:C871:9CA2:2686 (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah but the way it was phrased really presents a issue. Saying "not only" did he drive a woman off a bridge, but he ran off without rescuing her. Oh, and he also "evaded" prison time. All that is loading the dice. According to him, he made several dives on the car....and saying he evaded prison is basically a POV statement that he should have gotten prison. The incident has so many moving parts that I thought just linking to it was best. Rja13ww33 (talk) 22:26, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: But that's what happened. He evaded prison and only got his drivers license suspended.137.70.164.141 (talk) 22:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Again: it is a POV statement. And two people hardly constitute a consensus. Rja13ww33 (talk) 00:19, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details about Chappaquiddick incident need to be included in the article
Talk:Suharto

message: In a recent article, an author uses a definition of fascism developed by the writer and retired businessman, Laurence Britt. To develop his theory, Britt compared the regimes of Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Salazar, George Papadopoulos and Suharto, all of which he deemed fascist. Can we now accept this new definition and change this article to reflect its findings? Please discuss at WP:RSN#Proud Boys. Note that while the source is used to label the Proud Boys as fascist, it could also be used as a source for other articles if it is deemed reliable. TFD (talk) 23:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: New definition of Fascism

message: Why do people keep changing his portrait with 1998 one?
If you are doing this, please stop, and reach consensus here in the talk page first.
Khalif Ali Husain the Third (talk) 08:08, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1998 portrait is simply more suitable; it shows what he looked like in the majority of news broadcasts and books etc. from when his regime first came to light. Also, most other political figures generally have their portraits from their last term or even after their terms ended, for example Margaret Thatcher or Barack Obama. Surely the same applies here? Mordhau (talk) 14:04, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait 

message: a wikipedia editor had removed his title of General on the top of the infobox stating that it doesn't fit with wikipedia's standards, yet we can see it on infoboxes belonging to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Min_Aung_Hlaing , why is it a different case here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mordhau (talk • contribs) 16:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox honourific titles
Talk:Grand unification energy

message: As qualified as Stephen Hawking may be, A Brief History of Time is hardly a fitting scientific work from which to cite material for an encyclopedia. If we are going to cite references we can at least do so from proper scientific literature or at least modern physics textbooks. -- Fropuff 01:01, 2004 Feb 16 (UTC)
Disagree. It's from a reliable source, and it's extremely relavant to the article. I see no reason to take it out. You could also cite more recent ones, but I think it's a good addition to the article. →Raul654 01:16, Feb 16, 2004 (UTC)
The GUT scale is incorrectly given in terms of eV in this article; should be GeV.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.15.122.212 (talk) 16:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Brothers of Jesus

message: Maybe mention the guy somewhere.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.212.127.195 (talk) 01:03, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hong Xiuquan 

message: Is it true so tell me some evidence 116.90.116.58 (talk) 10:07, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: We have no way of telling whether it's true or not. tgeorgescu (talk)  10:30, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The brothers and sisters of the Jesus is in another mother 

message: Jesus' brothers. Joseph was not Jesus' father, but he is mentioned as such, meaning his "brothers" didn't have to be his "flesh" brothers. 2605:BA00:3208:924:6CF5:9C85:F216:7D88 (talk) 01:09, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesus' brothers. Jose.was NOT the father of Jesus, but yet he is mentioned as his father, meaning that they didn't have to be his "flesh" brothers.. 

message: The page states more than once that there is "no Biblical evidence" for Joseph being an older man and the Adelphoi being step siblings and/or cousins, but the most common scriptural evidence given by Catholics seems to be twofold. Firstly, Joseph died before the crucifixion, and secondly Jesus has to give Mary away to be taken care of by John, an Apostle who was not a blood relative. These two pieces are the most common given by Catholics, so in the interest of fairness the page should reflect this instead of the biased statement of "there is no Biblical evidence" Ptinkle99 (talk) 03:37, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "No Biblical Evidence" 

message: One editor insists that "Some Lutheran Churches have accepted" beliefs about non-brothers of Jesus.  The only reference is a web page by ONE pastor from a Missouri Synod Lutheran Church.  This does not justify the statement that LCMS has a broad doctrine about this and does not have anything to do with other Lutheran Synods.  This ia  dubious statement and has no citation to support it.  I have appropriately tagged the article.Pkgx (talk) 23:52, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry to tell you that the Missouri Synod Lutheran Church is not the only one that believes in the perpetual virginity of Mary, with a church that believes in this it can be said "some Lutheran Churches" --Rafaelosornio (talk) 01:05, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lutheran beliefs
Talk:Pro Wrestling USA

message: You NEVER mentioned World Class wrestling but wrote like you mentioned them already . WTF ??? That last section has almost nothing to do with this subject .It's just wrestling related and just a little related .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.233.70.198 (talk) 06:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uhhhhhh . . .. .  Ummmmmm that last section makes almost no sense as to why it's there and World Class wrestling is brought up like it was already mentioned , but it WASN'T
Talk:Pencil sharpener

message: the picture floating on the left side messes up one of the headings, someone might want to fix that (i've got some AP Gov't hoemwork to do...) ugen64 02:37, Feb 16, 2004 (UTC)
: Could be worse - you could have electromagnetics (shudder) →Raul654 02:43, Feb 16, 2004 (UTC)
:And on the right it was overlapping with previous image (on 1280*1024 screen res). I moved it down. Pete/Pcb21 (ta
lk) 10:30, 16 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  the picture floating on the left side 

message: 3 dimensions should be given, IMHO Jclerman 16:01, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are pencil sharpeners unidimensional? 

message: *Per WP:DYK, this was the first article featured in "Did you know?" on the Main Page.  Curt Wilhelm VonSavage (talk) 11:52, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia history: First "Did you know?" 

message: Carpenter's pencils don't have a flat shape.
I suggest "their flattened shape" or "their flattened cross-section". Ellipsoid would be good instead, too, but I think flattened is perfectly find (i.e. to imply it's flattened from a circular cross-section).
Comments? Best wishes. SimonTrew (talk) 04:25, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pencils are not 2-dimensional either 

message: Surely an electric pencil sharpener is also mechanical. Should this not be a "manual" pencil sharpener?
Best wishes SimonTrew (talk) 06:10, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mechanical" sharpener- nomenclature 

message: Is it significant enough to be included that in U.S. schools, planetary pencil sharpeners are in most every class-room, whereas in many other countries, if pencils are commonly used in schools, individual students use prismatic pencil sharpeners?  If this is considered significant, then references will have to be dug up. Kdammers (talk) 04:48, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ubiquitous in American schools
Talk:Overwhelming exception

message: Does this fallacy pass the google test? Search for "overwhelming exception" does not return any sites on which it is used as being a fallacy, except our own content. Mrdice 02:54, 2004 Feb 16 (UTC)
: I know it's done; however, as to the proper name for it, I hae no idea. Kuroune 00:17, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

message: It is unclear whether the current Alan Greenspan quote constitutes an "overwhelming exception".  The link provided was unsuitable (a blog page containing what appears to be a rant) Dougy5537.  —Preceding undated comment added 09:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Since he classifies the exceptions as "notably rare" and doesn't say the invisible hand otherwise always works, the example indeed doesn't belong. Regardless of whether the actual exceptions are overwhelming or not, Greenspan's reference to them is not an example of this fallacy, but rather intended to emphasize their rarity (in his opinion). I've removed it. ± Lenoxus (" *** ") 03:04, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious

message: The redirect Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play? has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 00:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The North

message: There seems to be a lot of overlap between this page and North (disambiguation).  Might it not be better to merge the two pages?  --Russ Blau (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: Neutral euphemism is a contradiction in terms... --86.20.219.123 16:30, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ...
Talk:Paraguay

message: This is a general article about Paraguay in which I am generally interested.
This section was quite misleading/ irritating at first read as it contrasts with later statements. 
The source says that there are less than 100 000 such people (out of roughly 7 mio).
It is based on a 2002 census.
Is this still valid? Is it relevant?
I think this needs an update or be kicked out.
2003:E4:4704:DF30:E539:EB71:B2A:430 (talk) 13:33, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you raise a good point. I don't know if the data in that section continues to be valid or relevant, and it would be great to have more current data. For the time being, I'll add in "as of the 2002 census" to make it clear that this information is not current. You mention that the information is misleading and that it contrasts with later statements. Can you say more about that? Cheers, -- irn (talk) 15:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Paraguay "Social issues of the indigenous"

message: "[nb 2]" in the infobox should be put in superscript by an experienced editor. also, why cant i paste into this textbox. wikipedia feels like getting worse. EnTerbury (talk) 02:01, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  format 