lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Syphon Filter: Dark Mirror

message: Who put in the part where no other SF game uses profanity? It's completely untrue, Omega Strain uses profanity! oops forgot to sign Mujarimojo 21:06, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Profanity

message: It's far too long. I think it can be summed up with a lot less paragraphs but I am too lazy to do it. ShinraiTS4 06:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You'd know, Dibol, because you were deeply involved in them, and kicked the whole business off (see here.  You've edit warred, made personal attacks, sock puppeted, broke the 3RR, you name it, you've done it, all in favour of plot summaries which are not encyclopaedic (see Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.  Saying "Other Stuff Exists" is not a reason to keep shit in an article.  Your constant failure to adhere to any of Wikipedia's rules does not seem to have hampered you at all, so more power to you.  I shall watch on with amusement.  Geoff B (talk) 20:14, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary 

message: The plot section is, quite simply, far too long.  Please discuss the reasons for this here on the talk page.  Plot sections should be concise, as set out in WP:PLOT.  Just so no one can claim ignorance, a definition of 'concise' is available on wiktionary here.  Reasons such as 'Other articles have long plot sections' are not applicable.  By that rationale, other articles contain original research, so this one should too.  Obviously this is a rather erroneous line of thinking.  Thanks!  Geoff B (talk) 18:06, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You keep bringing other articles into this.  Other articles cannot be used as an excuse.  Focus on one article, if you can, the one currently being discussed.  Plot sections should not explain every nuance of the plot, they are meant to be a synopsis.  Seven to nine paragraphs is not 'as concise as possible'.  For the purposes of an encyclopaedia, where brevity is necessary, too short is preferable to too long.  For good examples, look at Halo, And Then There Were None, etc, for good eaxamples, as they are featured articles.  Geoff B (talk) 15:35, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlong plot section.
Talk:Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association

message: Bowling IS approved, I think.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cpurrin1 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bowling approval

message: Suggest that the recent champions in basketball section be split to a new article (List of PIAA basketball state champions), similar to List of PIAA football state champions. It feels like over-coverage to have it in this main article. —Ost (talk) 22:49, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split to [[List of PIAA basketball state champions]] 

message: The redirect PIAA (disambiguation) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 11:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:PIAA (disambiguation)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Blood flow

message: I feel the need to point out that this article is essentially useless to anyone attempting to look up the right of blood flow, and that this is something that should probably be rectified.
Seriously, why the hell is an article on blood flow essentially just a copypasta of a paper on something COMPLETELY DIFFERENT?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.229.204.161 (talk) 23:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Shortly: The structure is/was void of sense. There are out of place informations and missing essential informations
Problems:
Blood flow is about the circulation of the blood. The composition of the blood is worth to mentioning, but not in 5 different sections.
There are too many paragraphs about pure physics not connected to biological phenomenons. Some of these sections: "The basics of motion", "Position", "Acceleration", "Newton's Laws of Motion", "Momentum", "Stress", "Hydrostatic pressure" etc... This facts and laws are well described in other articles. Therefore I recommend to shorten and fuse them in one paragraph: "Hydrodynamics", because it is completely unnecessary to write about Newton's Laws of Motion like it would be also unnecessary to talk about quantum physics. An encyclopedia contains interconnecting articles, and not books.
Other problem that physics paragraphs are about Newton's Laws of Motion and Newtonian fluids, but blood is NOT NEWTONIAN FLUID and blood vessels are NOT RIGID TUBES. The adequate science to explain the physics of blood flow is hemodynamics. 
And of course blood flow is more than pure hemodynamics, for example it has neuroendocrin regulation and this article contains nothing about it. 
The article is quiet huge, but lacks essential biological information, but is contains trivial facts, like "We have the gastrointestinal system which aids the digestion and the absorption of food. We also have the respiratory system which is responsible..." If someone look up "blood flow", She/He must know about such basic things. 
Example: There is a section about hydrostatic pressure. It is a basic pure describing model without any relation of the biological reality. A blood vessel is not a rigid tube, and blood is a non-Newtonian fluid. Nowadays there are much more adequate models to describe hemodynamics.
Other recent/formal mistakes:
"Blood is the viscous fluid composed of plasma and cells." The Blood is composed of plasma and formed elements, and formed elements are not only cells. Think about platelets. 
Attila v m (talk) 02:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article under complete rearrangement
Talk:André Marques (pianist)

message: Hello.  Does anyone know whether Mr. Marques meets the basic criterion for a person to be the subject of a Wikipedia article?  I.e. has he been the subject of suitable source material?  The current article's 1 reference gives him merely the briefest of mentions.  If I don't see any responses I may add the notability tag.  Regards.  Open4D (talk) 14:38, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Aviation Research Centre

message: Sir I am a engineer.but I want to join in any security or investigating agency ..I want to serve for my country still death as a cope either officially or unofficially ....I don't want any salary....I just want to die for my country...its my dream sir I always think about it  sir please give me the opportunity to die for my country.i want to join in Run ....Attack.....War....Or information... i hope u understand the countrylovers feelings ...I have written Manny letters to different security agencyes but reply is 'come with the genuine process' but sir I don't want any salary so try me Please consider it sir..Jay hind Janmejay Dhal (talk) 18:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jay hind
Talk:Clifford Jordan

message: Wikipedia article just copy-pastes biography entry from allmusic.com by Scott Yanow (and "inside/outside sax player" came from there). See  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.152.89.120 (talk • contribs) 11:40, 19 September 2009
: It doesn't leave much, but I re-wrote the text to omit the copyvio. Thank you, -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 18:41, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for the biography
Talk:Robert Charroux

message: I do not know if there's a template to request a translation, but I wish to request a translation of this article from the French Wp.
--Saoshyant 16:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Wikipedia:WikiProject Echo is responsible for this sort of thing; the correct place for requests is Wikipedia:Translation into English. --ais523 16:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The book, 'Legacy of the Gods' -  (L'héritage des dieux), that was published in 1965 & and 74, has been left off the list under Publications, (In French). Bosavi9 (talk) 16:49, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publications
Talk:David Fiuczynski

message: It appears there is no family section or family historical biography information to-date, while his mother's biography on the link below as part of her formal in-print obituary has information regarding his family listing "three children: Andrea Fiuczynski, Chairman, Sotheby's West Coast; David Fiuczynski, Professor, Berklee College of Music; Marc Fiuczynski PhD, Principal Architect, Akamai Technologies." Is an African-American section in order?  http://matherhodge.com/tribute/details/412/Ruth-Fiuczynski/obituary.html 33L71488 (talk) 11:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe an African-American section?
Talk:Wing Island

message: This page is the one that opens when the text 'flight game' is searched for on wikipedia.org. This is an inappropriate linkage as this is not the name of the game, but is a game genre name. The page should be given a new title and moved. Demorphica 11:47, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrongful Linking

message: Is there a source for the US release date? Everywhere else I check seems to say "Q2" or "TBD". Pikku 21:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here: . TJ Spyke 00:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

text: This game does appear to be for children, thus it probably wont appeal to adults. JayKeaton 06:26, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: US Release Date
Talk:N-Acetylglutamate synthase deficiency

message: The structure analogue is not N-Carbamoyl Phosphate but N-carbamoyl-L-glutamate. See .
---Speleo3 (talk) 15:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: corrected in article --Speleo3 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:44, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  N-Carbamoyl Phosphate
Talk:Soapmaking

message: LisaBarger.com - Free online soap making class with no registration required.
That sounds like an Advertisement for a website...that doesn't sound neutral.  Check this for me... -RadSkat3 16:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising 

message: mhm,can you make the pictures bigger.so i can actually see it when i print it! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.235.131.212 (talk) 05:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  mhm,picture of soap. 

message: Seems to me like this entry ought to be merged and redirected to soaper or soap? --Belg4mit 16:13, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Brian Lara International Cricket 2007

message: Having been at the open day I've added a few details on that and will try to add some more later - barmyarmy
That section isn't very good as it stands. It features criticisms which don't neccessarily apply to the final release, doesn't say which version(s) were on show, and the last part is a little too fawning, and effectivel contradicts the first part. --MartinUK 15:45, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open day 

message: it says that no player is licensed except out of tournaments like BLIC 05, but can you change them like you can with BLIC 05? Speedboy Salesman 16:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Licensing

message: I initially changed the release date to 22nd of March as on the Codemasters eStore it said the game was "Out Now", but I changed it back to 23rd because most online stores say 23rd of march and most importantly, the Brian Lara official page on the Codemasters site says 23rd as the release date. ●BillPP (talk|contribs) 20:35, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Release date

message: Reviews have in fact been over-whelmingly negative and to suggest that "The game has been praised for its relatively realistic simulation of real cricket" is to give a wholly inaccurate impression. I've edited the reviews section to mention this. - Saltiresfan 20:46, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews

message: Have tidied up improvements as well. Keeper stuff was very minor (and unsourced) and we certainly don't need to know (completely unverified anyway) who won the first match. Saltiresfan 20:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed all but one part of this section, as it was all directly lifted from another website. SGGH speak! 09:07, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements

message: can you change the names on the unofficial like you can in BLIC 05 Speedboy Salesman 14:06, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is available in the PS2 version at least. ●BillPP (talk|contribs) 13:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: Well first things first of course i am an american
and i am very intersted in learning about the game of cricket..Like any other game i would love to play this for 360 instead of the computer cause mine is really crappy!
is there any way possible they would put this out in the states cause i mean i think people here would be intesrted in watching or even playing!. just like wit rugby they put that out here and it turned out to be a great experincing and now cant stop playing it....
is there any way possible of buying this game in the states where i could play it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.90.48.177 (talk) 07:26, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  US release
Talk:Con O'Neill (actor)

message: IMDB thinks he was born in 1966, not 1963 cf http://m.imdb.com/name/nm0642126/bio?ref_=m_mn_ov_bio .  Is there a reference for the 1963 birth date?  Or is this a different Con O'Neill?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pickygit (talk • contribs) 04:23, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:101 Reykjavík

message: So what's wrong with the tone of the article? Since it's not explained I'm going to remove the tag.--Termer (talk) 21:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Clearly it is too low:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0237993/business
Opening Weekend
$8,547 (USA) (29 July 2001) (1 Screen)
$10,335 (Argentina) (18 February 2003) (7 Screens)
Gross
$12,182 (USA) (29 July 2001)
$10,335 (Argentina) (18 February 2003)
$300,694 (Iceland) (19 November 2000)
$295,667 (Iceland) (29 October 2000)
$293,530 (Iceland) (22 October 2000)
$291,337 (Iceland) (15 October 2000)
$291,112 (Iceland) (8 October 2000)
$288,462 (Iceland) (1 October 2000)
$283,710 (Iceland) (24 September 2000)
$264,551 (Iceland) (17 September 2000)
$266,607 (Iceland) (3 September 2000)
$261,881 (Iceland) (27 August 2000)
$261,536 (Iceland) (20 August 2000)
$254,223 (Iceland) (13 August 2000)
$247,083 (Iceland) (6 August 2000)
$241,400 (Iceland) (30 July 2000)
$240,597 (Iceland) (23 July 2000)
$229,046 (Iceland) (16 July 2000)
$216,620 (Iceland) (9 July 2000)
$202,393 (Iceland) (2 July 2000)
$191,010 (Iceland) (25 June 2000)
$171,705 (Iceland) (18 June 2000)
$130,441 (Iceland) (11 June 2000)
$39,841 (Iceland) (4 June 2000)
$51,791 (Norway) (23 November 2000)
€97,401 (Spain) (20 December 2002)
€61,559 (Spain) (31 August 2002)
added up is more than that listed and it also showed in other countries too - e.g. UK, Germany which are not listed in these figures.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.96.60 (talk) 15:59, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gross revenue wrong
Talk:Beowulf & Grendel

message: Hi guys, I just watched this terrible film but there's a couple of things alittle off about the synopsis.  I'm going to make some minor adjustments, let me know what you think.  --Ughmonster 02:03, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Christian pop culture

message: I'm taking a bit of a risk here in bringing back this article.  I feel that this realy is a seperate topic from Christian music, and can be developed into a decent article to explain this culture.  In it's current state it does need a good clean up, but I think it's worth a shot.  I would like to ask that you at least leave a note on my talk page first if you want to send this back to being a redirect... --T-rex 16:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers

message: Give me a few minutes to see what I can turn up. ornis (t) 06:11, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have withdrawn my request for speedy deletion as the subject seems relatively notable now (it cited no references when I saw it and appeared to be an ad). Thank you for your contributions. --RucasHost 07:34, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  hangon 

message: What does everyone think about adding this article to the category :Category:Religion in the military?
Obviously the organization exists for atheists, but it is in a way an aspect of religion in the military, along the lines of "Hey military religious people - Not everyone in the military is religious." 
Any thoughts on this? KConWiki (talk) 18:37, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is a valid idea. Go for it. Frederick Green (talk) 20:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

text: I do not agree. Aethists are by definition non religious, so placing them in a religious category seems wrong on both sides of the argument. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 18:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization
Talk:Clement Lindley Wragge

message: When and where did he gain the title of 'Professor'? I've never seen it used anywhere else.
BodachMor 16:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are quite a lot of newspaper references to him as "Professor C.L. Wragge" as well as many others to "Professor Wragge" that occur in a meteorological context (so presumably talking about the same man), for example:
* 
* a whole bunch more
Today we associate the title of Professor with a university appointment and there is no mention of him having such an appointment, but perhaps there were other "norms" for the use of that title in those times. Perhaps it was just an informal honorific for his being so "learned"; he was, after all, a Fellow of both the Royal Geographical Society and the Royal Meteorological Society. Kerry (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Prof' Wragge?

message: Does anyone know if there was a full list compiled of all the cyclone names he used.
I've only been able to locate two:
* Cyclone Mahina
* Cyclone Nachon
Graham1973 (talk) 13:47, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There are plenty of newspaper accounts of Wragge's naming of individual cyclones:
* names of "storms"
* names of "cyclones"
From these we can see that he had a period where he used the letters of the Greek alphabet, a period where he used the names of politicians, a period where he used the name of South Sea maidens (with photographs), and it seems by the end he was just using female names (a tradition that others continued until our more recent politically-correct times). Apparently his original reason for naming them was to use as a shorthand in sending cables (I guess it cost less than telegraphing a more complex description). I don't know if there is any evidence that he had a list that he was working his way through or whether he just plucked each name from the air when he needed a new one. Kerry (talk) 02:58, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Cyclone Names
Talk:Vishnupad Temple

message: I just clicked the image Vishnupad and here in the Summary it is written Mahabodhi Temple. Recently I visited the holy Vishnupad Temple and the image just tallies with what I exactly saw. The mentioning of Mahabodhi temple seems to be misplaced. Or I may be corrected if I am wrong. − VMO 16:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary of the Image
Category talk:Films directed by Ron Howard

message: howie for a long time i was in love with you but you never paid any attention because you where to buzzy buzzing 
and i was under the impression that you would pay some how give me a sour expression witch you did sticking your business in some other chick and i told you how much  but ether you did not see me as a person or you were to bussy i did not know that howard dorough  would be ignorent 72.136.99.48 (talk) 17:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  hi this is just lisa
Talk:Yong Chin Pak

message: Ok clean up artists... i'm not great at creating new article's yet so I just make stubs and hope those of you who are good come along.  There is a picture of him on the NCTA page that should do nicely, and  good deal of information available to him online.  I also have a copy of his book so I may post quotes from it here for use as citations. Lordkazan 17:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A call to cleanup artists 

message: "President of the National Collegiate Taekwondo Association from 1986 to 2007" is not notably? jmcw (talk) 09:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Mater and the Ghostlight

message: Where are we getting the information that this short is eight minutes long? Could someone provide a source? RMS Oceanic 17:04, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Eight Minutes

message: The article says that Mater 'pulled flowers from under Red while Red was watering them'. If the flowers were UNDER Red, and Red was WATERING them, then, well, you know. This should probably be rephrased. A•N•N•Afoxlover     PLEASE SIGN HERE, ANYONE! 23:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Three years later, here I come, and I thought that was kinda funny. dogman15 (talk) 23:09, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red going pee-pee? 

message: Just out of curiosity, but is this not the fourth pixar film to include a voice cast, after Jack Jack Attack, Boundin', and Mike's New Car. (Boundin' is missing on the main page list).  Just checking before I made any changes.  --Nmajmani (talk) 15:56, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd with voice cast? 

message: Well? Tenk you veddy much.  --Wack'd Talk to me! • Admire my handiwork! 13:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who wrote it?
Talk:Wilbur Mills

message: This edit introduced a lot of unsourced and not-well-formatted material into the article, while deleting some references. I haven't had the time to look into the exact details but it should probably given another look and some of the insertions cleaned up. I notice many persist in the current article text. GlobeGores (talk page | user page) 00:13, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up unsourced edit
Category talk:Films by Powell and Pressburger

message: PLEASE NOTE: The most recently-established consensus (see Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 September 25#Film by director) has intentionally placed this category at Films by Powell and Pressburger, and not (for example) Films directed by Powell and Pressburger. Accordingly, this would not be a candidate for speedy rename to the latter or some other alternative.--cjllw ʘ TALK 00:39, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category title
Talk:La Verkin, Utah

message: The name of this article is La Verkin, Utah. However, the local press lists the spelling as LaVerkin (see example), and it is spelled that way on the website of Washington County. It is also listed as LaVerkin in the Governmental Entities Search page of the Utah Department of Commerce, although in fairness it should be pointed out that the state seems to use both spellings. The city website also seems to support both spellings, although it uses LaVerkin in addresses.
On the other hand, the United States Post Office uses La Verkin (although LaVerkin seems to work and can be looked up in the ZIP Code database). The USGS Geographic Names Information System lists La Verkin, and only provides an alternate spelling for "La Verkin Canal" ("Laverkin Canal").
I suppose that the NGIS is an authority, but some deference might be given to local preference in the body of the article. Jim 17:09, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: La Verkin or LaVerkin