lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Australian Army regiments

message: You show RAA and RAE and Aviation as Support Arms.RAAC, RAA, RAE and RA Inf have always been the Arms Corps, Aviation has recently   been added mainly due to the new Attack helicopters.
---
Negative, the Royal Australian Artillery Corps has always been an Arms/Combat Corps.
http://www.defencejobs.gov.au/default.asp?initMedia=1&media=flash&bounceBack=/default.asp&p=824
Above link states that the 'Gun Number' job is a direct combat role and not open for females. In addition, it states that females may serve in direct combat units in 'combat support positions'.
This article is titled 'List of Australian Army Regiments'. There is no need to list the Corps here, as there is already an article for that. Futhermore, there are no conventions or rules stating that only combat regiments need to be listed here or given priority. As such, I've listed all the regiments I could find on the Structure -> Units page of the official Army website.
If you feel I'm incorrect, feel free to post evidence here. Vietbong 00:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Support Arms

message: During my time in the Adelaide University Regiment we were part of RA Inf. Do the university regiments still exist? Ozdaren 13:30, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: University Regiments
Talk:Fastech 360

message: I have removed the non-sourced image, :Image:Fastech 360S.jpg and replaced it with a less questionable one from the BBC website, probably an AP photo. Still, the previous one was better as it showed the flaps more. If anyone can find a better (and free) photo, please post it in lieu of the current one. Thanks. -- Tangotango 15:31, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added one from Commons. Stevage 11:37, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Looks like the Japanese page  has much more info. Stevage 11:37, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Excuseme. Do you need my Japlish? It's difficult to write fluently. But, I can help you a little maybe. I can explain the nuance of the Japanese-sentence in English. I write Japlish here little by little when I am free. And you convert into fluent English. Is this way good?  --Aki 11:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone speak Japanese?

message: Something is wrong here.  This article says the top speed is 252. This article says it's 223 (in my opinion, 252 seems a bit ambitious, given the fastest TGV managed 310, only by dropping 3/4 of the passenger carriages).martianlostinspace 13:51, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Shinkansen is running under the law in Japan. FASTECH is made for purpose to clear the environmental standard (sound suppression at high-speed phase). You think "a bit ambitious". It's nonsensicaly. Because the Shinkansen was reached 446kph (about 277 mph) in 1996 yet. --Aki 11:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

text: one more. "360 km/h (223 mph) using derivatives of the FASTECH 360". DERIVATIVES. prototype train FASTECH is 252. --Aki 11:54, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 252mph?

message: The moe anthropomorphization. Does anyone have a picture of her? It would very much compliment the article, which does mention her! I think she'd be cute. Tyciol 20:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it really important? Does it really compliment the article? No. A doll based on a train made by sad acts with nothing in their lives does not compliment an amazing piece of technology like the Bullet Trains.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.173.194.4 (talk • contribs) 10:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fastech-tan
Talk:Mākutu

message: I've left a note on User talk:Makutu, in case they have further information. 
NB: Makutu has a more specific meaning in Māori as a curse, which has some similarity --Limegreen 10:01, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The original text of this article was 'In Polynesian mythology, Makutu is a difficult type of witchcraft which requires three tests to become proficient in.' This would appear to overstate the case as the word is apparently confined to the Māori language.' Kahuroa 02:13, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original

message: The article currently starts talking about Best (one of the refs), it should introduce him and his credentials for making the comment the first time anything is drawn from him I would think. --81.150.229.68 (talk) 13:18, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: I have slightly altered this, and placed it in context to the heading "origins & mythology". The reason being is that the information, while interesting, has not been sourced correctly, and contains no citations. While the actual oral transcripting of "makutu" into written form is a rarity, we must still be able to substanciate any claims made within the article. So I would suggest the original author update this section at the risk of it being deleted. LeafromOZ (talk) 08:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The True Makutu
Talk:Chūō Main Line

message: There is a lot of common information between these two pages. I think they should be merged Paullb (talk) 09:45, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Chūō Rapid Line]] 

message: Information covered in the Chuo Rapid Line article, like the rapid line trains (rapid, commuter rapid, special rapid etc...) should be removed from the stopping table. There is no reason to have this data twice. Paullb (talk) 22:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Chūō Rapid Line is a mere part of operation of the Chūō Main Line between Tokyo and Takao or Ōtsuki. This main line article generally describes the relationship among the services (local, rapid service and limited express trains). Information like that Suidōbashi Station is served by local trains but is skipped by rapid trains is not within the proper scope of the rapid line article. (Yes, it can describe it. But it is improper if such information about Suidōbashi Station only appears on the rapid line article.) So, I believe the stopping pattern of rapid trains should be kept. However, if most people think the table is too complicated, I have an idea of replacing the existing four columns for the rapid trains with one integrated column. --Sushiya (talk) 13:04, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That would seem more reasonable to me. Also, it doesn't seem necessary to me to have 3 columns describing the local service as well. One column would suffice with small notes specifing that some trains enter the Tozai line at Nakano and that some Chuo-line (orange) trains run on the Sobu tracks in the early morning and late night. Also, limited express information seems to be lacking from the table. It seems to me that a 3-column layout would be best (local-rapid trains (with more detail on the Rapid line page)-limited express). Paullb (talk) 02:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chuo rapid line information 
Talk:Khairagarh

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:20, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition
Talk:British Nationality Act 1981

message: Defining citizenship is fundamental to the constitution of any state. This statute is a fundamental piece of constitutional law in the UK. Therefore it belongs in :Category:Constitutional laws of the United Kingdom. --Mais oui! 10:23, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't agree with you on this I'm afraid. The constitutional laws relate to how the country is governed, not nationality. In any case most of the provisions in the act are no longer in force. I suggest you read some the Constitution of the United Kingdom article which defines the applicable laws that should be in that category as I noticed you also put various other Acts in which are not considered constitutional laws. Remember you can always ask a more experienced wikipedian if you are not sure by leaving a message on their talk page. Regards Astrotrain 13:20, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

text: In some countries, such as the Republic of Ireland and United States there are specific constitutional provisions that affect citizenship entitlement.    This is not the case in the United Kingdom (and most countries), British nationality law is more a matter of administrative rather than constitutional law.   JAJ 00:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Constitutional laws of the United Kingdom]] 

message: In reference to: Prior to the Act coming into force, the vast majority of those born in Britain, (with limited exceptions such as children of diplomats) were entitiled to British Citizenship, after the Act came into force, citizenship was generally transmitted by the parents.
This is not correct.   Even after the Act came into force, the vast majority of UK born children are still British citizens by birth.   This is because the parents do not need to be British citizens, permanent residence in the United Kingdom is sufficient.   I have amended the comment accordingly. JAJ 04:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth in the United Kingdom 

message: Argentina was claiming the Falklands long before 1982. The law of 1981 is unlikely to have had much influence on the claim.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.65.2.139 (talk) 16:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falklands
Category talk:Archaeology

message: 52 Km south east of Deoria(Uttar Pradesh) and 3 Km east of Bhagalpur(small town in deoria distric)at the bank of saryu river lies the Sahiyagarh.A place where many idols are left under the sun without any eye of govt archaelogical agencies. These idols are of either Pal or Gupta dynasty. Some of the remains of temple reminds the past glory of the place. Few of the idols are flown in the river by the villagers due to ignorance.Some of the idols are kept by them and they worship them as their KULDEVATA(family God).The villagers has kept the copper coins which were found in the area.Following are the places which needs a archeological attention:
1.Mahadev Mound: Along the bank of the river and south of the village a mound is situated which is called by local people it as Mahadev.The remains are only one fourth of  its original form because mount was cut to make a primary school.
2.Remains of the Temple: Above the Mahadev mound the remains of an old temple can be seen. The wall of sanctum sanctorum of the temple is three feet wide and there are three marked place of idols. Remains of seven other rooms are also available.
All are made according to Nagar style.Often copper coins and utensils used in worshipping the God are found in this area.
3.IDOLS:a) Idol of Sun: It is lying under the Peepal tree of the primary school.This is 4 feet high and 2 feet wide and made up of red sand stone. This idol is made according to directions of VISHNU-DHARMOTTARPURAN, VISHWAKARMSHILP, VRIHATSANHITA, AGNIPURAN, MATSYAPURAN and BHAVISYAPURAN. There is Dandi on the right side and Pingal on the left side.Between the feet Bhoodevi is lying and above Usha and Pratusha(both wives of Sun) are lying.
b)Idol of Lord Vishnu: Behedded idol of lord Vishnu is lying in the remains of the temple.This is four and half feet high and two and half feet wide and made up of black stone.Three arms of the idols are missing.
c) Other idol of Lord Vishnu: This is lying under the tree of the primary school.Only feet with anklets are left. 
d)Idol of Lord Shiv: This depicts the destroyer form of lord Shiv. This idol is a bit different from the other idols of SHIV found elsewhere in the country.
e)Throne made up of granite:This is lying under a Peepal tree of the primary school.Probably this has been recovered from the sanctum sanctorum of the temple and used to be the main place of the prime idol.
      Beside all these there is a pond which is called as KUND by local people.It is a local saying that this pond was connected with the temple but there is no proof of this.
C-MODEP a local organization is working hard to give its glory back.
*This is weird. Should the above be here? PatHadley (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAHIYAGARH 

message: These categories are pretty messy. Would anyone object to me having a go at tidying them? PatHadley (talk) 21:47, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganisation
Talk:Jobstown

message: Should this be in both Tallaght category and directly in the category above that?  And is it about Jobstown specifically or West Tallaght? Twilson r 06:30, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorisation 
Talk:History of the Roman Canon

message: The original text is from The Catholic Encyclopedia, which was copyrighted in 1908, and is now in the public domain — MSchmahl 10:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You seem to be right.  The Catholic Encyclopedia article begins, "Nicetas of Remesiana (Romanatia)".  The dates of death conflict with this article, so I'll just remove it from this article. — MSchmahl… 19:31, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright notice 

message: Many statements are made throughout the entry without proper sourcing.  Not everything comes from the Catholic Encyclopedia article.  Whatever does not needs to be sourced, please!Mwidunn (talk) 18:19, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources?
Talk:Moss Side, South Ribble

message: I propose that this page be moved to Moss Side, Lancashire, in line with other Lancashire villages such as Anderton, Lancashire, Banks, Lancashire, Overton, Lancashire and Rufford, Lancashire - at the moment it's the only village in Lancashire using its parliamentary constituency as its marker.  Any thoughts? Aquilina 10:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No thoughts, it would appear.  As there's been no dissenting voices, and the move is in line with WP naming conventions, I'm going to move the article now, and edit the corresponding redirects accordingly.  If there's any problems with this move, direct them to User_talk:Aquilina.  Aquilina 13:39, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Txalaparta

message: There was a badly written link to Nomadak TX.
However I cannot see its Flash.
If you find it interesting add it to the article.
--Error 22:20, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomadak

message: How do you say txalaparta? An IPA pronunciation would be nice. I imagine it’s something like ch-arla-parta. Max Naylor 11:31, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Don't think the link name (bikoa) is an accurate one, the appropriate term as opposed to "herrena" is "ttakuna".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iñaki LL (talk • contribs) 11:39, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  bikoa not an accurate term 

message: I have re-structured the section, with small changes and deletion of overlapping information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iñaki LL (talk • contribs) 20:10, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development of the previous Music section 

message: It's been a long time since the statement was called into question, no answer has been sent and I've erased it.21:30, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Txalaparta for the battle

message: Some links to videos in YouTube to show similarities with Txalaparta.  Semantron and Toaca are used as a means to call for prayer but also as communication for funerals and celebrations.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bGB-d343Z4&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T509N0Frd4s&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMKzgRwd4bM&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3IZJ1d3HxQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYOtc5Z797Y&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eROZmbuzzr4&feature=related
83.78.143.47 (talk) 14:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the article already mentions the toaca in the intro. Akerbeltz (talk) 14:35, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Semantron / Toaca
Talk:The Footprints of God

message: The plot summary seems to be in error and unclear.  Whom was Tennant supposed to murder?  I just finished the book, and I don't recall that.  Also, the last sentence, about someone guiding Tennant, is unfounded or POV or original research.  The summary also has nothing about Godin and about the uploading of Tennant's and his girl-friend's "minds" into Trinity.  There is also no mention of the issues of the dangers and benefits of AI that are brought forward in the book. 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:ECE7:537D:55A2:E973 (talk) 05:12, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary
Talk:Canada at the Commonwealth Games

message: This was nominated for speedy deletion. It clearly had potential for expansion so I turned it into a stub. Capitalistroadster 11:03, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, but the links are spam and that's what the article was created for. I've deleted the linkspam. — Saxifrage ✎ 19:47, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: CSD

message: Newfoundland became part of Canada in 1949, so how can it have competed at the 1938 British Empire Games as part of the Canadian team?
: Newfoundland was actually a British colony, even though it was nominally the Dominion of Newfoundland, from 1934 until 1949 under the Commission of Government. - (203.211.71.37 (talk) 01:35, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Newfoundland]]
Talk:The Fortunate Pilgrim

message: For several years this article's infobox described it as a crime novel. No reference was given to bolster the label. Its presence violated NPOV and OR: it was definitely the POV of its editor, who perhaps read the novel, and concluded that its subject was crime—hence OR. Much of the article, indeed, lacks proper reference. However, I've read the book, and Mr. Puzo's description of it in The Godfather Papers and Other Confessions. While I no longer own that excellent book, I can report that Puzo spoke highly of The Fortunate Pilgrim in 1972, and that he ruefully recounted that its publisher admonished him for not including more true crime in 'the Pilgrim," given the runaway success of The Godfather. Tapered (talk) 10:13, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real crime to label this work as a "crime novel"
Talk:History of classical mechanics

message: Newton and Leibniz developed calculus independently of each other. Newton was first, but kept his method a secret, so Leibniz developed it a bit late, not knowing about Newtons calculus. Newton was miffed about this.DanielDemaret 11:14, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Calculus

message: The title of this article doesn't match its content.  Classical mechanics refers to those traditions in mechanics that begin with Newton's laws of motion.  By that criterion everyone from Aristotle to Galileo should be removed.  I see three possible solutions, listed in my order of preference:
#Change the title to History of mechanics, which would allow room for everyone from Aristotle to Galileo and from Einstein to the present.
#Put the early figures in a "precursors to classical mechanics" section.
#Remove the early people and limit it to Newton and his successors.
Does anyone have any preferences?
--SteveMcCluskey 02:26, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Steve, that's a good insight, although doesn't it depend on how you define "classical"?  I see the term as being contrasted with "quantum", so I prefer solution #2.  By that definition, the pre-Newton people did contribute some classical mechanics, e.g., the laws of static equilibrium for levers (Aristotle, Galileo and others), the theory of collisions (Descartes), and even Newton's first law (Galileo?).   Interested in what others think, Willow 13:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classical mechanics? 

message: This page needs expansion, or going into a more general mechanics' history page. A briefing on the possible points on this topic will be:
# Pre-Newton/Galileo.
# Classical of Newton and Galieo.
# Golden age of mechanicism, reformulations of classical mechanics: Lagrange, Euler, etc.
# End of Galilean paradigm -> Einstein.
# Einstein, relativity and so on.
# Small introduction to quantum mechanics, blablabla.
If I'll manage to have more time, I'll contribute here a few.--Patillotes (talk) 15:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion needed 

message: The entire section on purportedly Islamic sources of some of Galileo's thinking should really be removed for severe inaccuracy. Galileo had no access to these Islamic writings. He could not read Arabic, and none of these works had been translated into Greek, Latin, or Italian. Moreover, we know that most of the sources of Galileo's research were the Florentine Academy and the School of Padua (brilliantly described by Paul O. Kristeller), the Greek and Latin translations of the ancient authors Aristotle, Archimedes, etc., and the entire Italian Renaissance school of mechanics: Cardano, Telesio, Pomponazzi, etc. Having just read the article on History of Medieval Science, I saw these "lists" of Islamic, Indian, and Chinese scientists and inventors, the writers continually making the point that these men supposedly "discovered" x, y, or z before some European. The question is also, "What did he do with the discovery?" but I guess that's for thE Talk Page there. 66.108.89.8 (talk) 02:26, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources of Galileo's Concepts
Talk:Bristol Crown Court

message: Is the animal rights case just an example, or is it a notable case?  If it's a notable case, please explain/provide evidence of its notability.  And more information about the Court wouldn't hurt either ;) --Tim4christ17 11:16, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Treaty of Saigon (1862)

message: I used the following sources when compiling the article:
*http://www.ichiban1.org/html/history/bc_1964_prewar/french_indochina_1858_1941.htm
*http://travel.yahoo.com/p-travelguide-830860-ho_chi_minh_city_ho_chi_minh_city-i
*http://www.bartleby.com/67/1474.html
*http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-14606.html
*http://oferriere.free.fr/Jours/jours06/jours0605.htm
*http://www.clio.fr/CHRONOLOGIE/chronologie_vietnam_le_siecle_de_la_colonisation_francaise.asp
*Britannica 2003
EurowikiJ 11:22, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article started

message: "both France and China claimed the sovereignty over the territories which will be."
This isn't English.  It's also unclear what it was meant to say.--GwydionM (talk) 15:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: Annam (Chinese Province) only exist from 679 to 938 (see Annam). Although many countries up to the 19th century called Vietnam as Annam but in name only; Vietnam wasn't part of the Qing Empire at the time.  Kinh Duong Vuong (talk) 21:36, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why, then, does the article say "It was to remain Annam for the next 600 years, seemingly living up to its name"? From 679 to 938 is only 259 years. You're not making sense. Badagnani (talk) 21:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Tự Đức was an emperor of the Nguyen Dynasty, so I removed Annam. Thanks for the explanation. Badagnani (talk) 21:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool! Kinh Duong Vuong (talk) 21:50, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a very good change and improves the article.Davehi1 (talk) 21:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Annam
Talk:Pinyin (disambiguation)

message: how do u say, 'Hello, can you stop kill stealing my friends mobs please, Dalemir' in chinese pinyin?
and where could i find a decent english into pinyin coverter or translation?
:The answer to the first question is something like, "Nǐ hǎo, qīng bié shā wǒ de péngyǒumen de bàomín le, Dálèmǐr." I'm not sure about the second one, though. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 05:21, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled