lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
File talk:CM5 Mystery of the Snow Pearls.jpg

message: Doesn't MediaWiki usually preserve the orginal uploader info automatically, even when the image is changed or adjusted? It seems strange to need to add it manually. It was good of you to do so, however. --GentlemanGhost 05:07, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do it so it's immediately clear. If there turns out to be a problem with the image later, the original uploader should be notified, not me. It's unrealistic to expect someone to search through the history to double-check that the person listed as the uploader of the only current version of the image is also the original uploader. Of course they would assume I'm the original uploader if I didn't make it explicitly clear that someone else is. —Angr 06:05, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for replying. I guess I'm confused. When I have uploaded modified versions on top of images that someone else uploaded first, it has preserved the original uploader's name automatically. This is the only time I've seen where that hasn't been the case. Did someone remove that information? I'm just trying to understand. Thanks for your help! --GentlemanGhost 19:24, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the old version myself (I can do that because I'm an admin). If I hadn't, the original uploader's name would have been preserved. But that would also have made it possible for someone to revert to the large-resolution version. Since that is a policy violation, I deleted the large-res version so it's not available anymore. —Angr 20:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha! Much is explained! Thanks for taking the time to do so! --GentlemanGhost 22:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original uploader
Talk:Bird stone

message: The image of a bird effigy from Honolulu is not representative of North American bird stones described in this article. The most common form of bird stone resembles a side profile of a duck decoy. 38.88.233.130 (talk) 17:47, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong image on page
Talk:Boxer at Rest

message: Is it Greek bronze or a Roman bronze copy of an originally Greek sculpture? Chrisrus (talk) 05:35, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek or Roman? 

message: The hyperlink regarding Jerry Saltz's comparison of the statue to a Goya work takes you to Goya's painting The Colossus, whilst I can't find the original article by Saltz I suspect it's much more likely he is referring to Goya's Seated Giant which is similar compositionally and in which you can actually see the giant's face. I feel the link should be updated accordingly. Can anyone disprove this?
109.246.48.120 (talk) 17:35, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jerry Saltz's Reference to Goya 
Talk:Broken Obelisk

message: I thought there was a copy outside a Berlin museum, don't remember which though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.11.57.26 (talk) 17:43, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't one in Germany? 

message: The way I read the article, there were five originals: Corcoran Gallery (now in Houston), Seagram Bldg., MoMA, and 2 at Washington U. But then it says the 2003 casting for Berlin is the fourth one. 98.197.249.31 (talk) 19:36, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many castings were made? 

message: * http://siris-artinventories.si.edu/ipac20/ipac.jsp?&profile=all&source=~!siartinventories&uri=full=3100001~!15036~!0#focus ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:36, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link for Seattle 
Talk:Bust (sculpture)

message: What is this generally referred to as in photography? Is it also called a bust?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.218.247.163 (talk) 00:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

message: I just added a picture of a wax bust and of a bronze bust because both of these materials were missing (quite incredibly so as far as bronze is concerned, since it is so frequently employed in sculpture). Now here is another bust in another material still: sandstone. I wont' add it to the article, though, because the sculptor seems to be unknown...--Insert coins (talk) 09:33, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  lacking 

message: The redirect Bust (sculpture has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 18:13, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Bust (sculpture]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Memorial Opera House

message: This article is a duplicate of Porter County Memorial Opera Hall.  The other article is more complete and this article should be consolidated into the other, although I don't believe this adds any information.  I'll wait 30 days before beginning the consolidation and deletion, on or after April 7, 2014.--Chris Light (talk) 18:10, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Article WP:BLAR'ed to the target you suggest.  – S. Rich (talk) 23:31, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate Article
Talk:List of Beta Upsilon Chi chapters

message: It is considered standard to include inactive chapters in chapters lists with a designation that they are inactive.Naraht (talk) 13:42, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of inactive chapters 

message: If Twitter info on BYX webpage for Alpha Epsilon moves off before the list gets updated, this will be unreferenced.Naraht (talk) 21:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alpha Epsilon 

message: Why is the Sports Conference relevant on a list of Fraternity chapters?Naraht (talk) 16:01, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports Conference?
Talk:Colletto Fava

message: no picture?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.68.107 (talk) 15:01, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't it be mentioned in the article that the rabbit has a sort of wound in its left side? It's a bit unclear in pictures, but the Gelitin article made mention of it.--The Ninth Bright Shiner 23:01, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wound 

message: a photo would be nice.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Not G. Ivingname (talk • contribs) 15:07, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  photo? 

message: Time is that you expected it is something that can make something disappear of reappear. But time doesn't only affect things but whole worlds as Earth. And this means that if WWIII starts then there will be new country's and country's that disappear from existence. One more thing is that time is something so important that without it nothing would happen! 98.10.136.102 (talk) 22:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time
Talk:Colossus of Constantine

message: What is the evidence that there are two right hands? If no reliable reference can be found, I intend to remove this... Valerius Tygart (talk) 12:44, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough! Valerius Tygart (talk) 13:31, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 right hands?

message: No real contradiction here!  Please leave this interesting information in the article.  The statue was disassembled in ancient times, and later discovered in fragments.  We probably will never know exactly what happened.  The second right hand might have been a discarded early draft, a spare part, a later revision of this acrolith, or possibly a piece of some other statuary.  These ancient statues were somewhat like lego figurines, easily revised with different, interchangeable parts.  Fascinating! 71.207.203.133 (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This modular statue was uncovered disassembled, in fragments 

message: The bronze version ought to be covered on this page, or have a page of its own.
"Among the fragments of the statue on display at the Capitoline Museums are a massive head, a left forearm and sphere."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/apr/29/giant-statue-roman-emperor-constantine-reunited-with-long-lost-finger
Housecarl (talk) 19:58, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: But it isn't 'a bronze version', it is an entirely different sculpture, albeit of the same subject. Urselius (talk) 15:59, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: One might give it a couple of lines here though. Johnbod (talk) 03:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bronze colossus of Constantine 

message: Maybe this article should link to Dominate, since it shows some of the artistic trends of that period (see the book Art Forms and Civic Life in the Late Roman Empire by H.P. L'Orange, ISBN 0-691-00305-X). AnonMoos (talk) 13:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dominate
Talk:Cubi

message: Does anyone know which Cubi is illustrated here in the un-captioned image? It is not Cubi XXVIII. The image has no information attached; it may, in fact, not be a Cubi (frankly it looks quite different from the many I can find on line).  If anyone could identify it and caption the figure that'd be awesome.  Cheers, Doctormatt (talk) 03:06, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: image needs more info
Talk:Dancing Satyr of Mazara del Vallo

message: The news release (Reuters) "Ancient Greek Bronze Fished From Sea Dazzles Italy", 4 January 2003, was recently deleted by a Wikipedian who disapproved of the news release's webhost, www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/882060/posts. Possibly it was a source for statements in this article, and had been included for that reason. Reuters may not be a familiar name to those who don't read foreign news. --Wetman (talk) 13:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:David (Verrocchio)

message: Erm, when I said "mostly edited by a zealot", I meant "most likely edited by a zealot". Oops. 74.95.3.61 (talk) 21:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Kammanadu

message: Hi! Please add facts, only with credible sources i.e. online resources or physical reference books. Thanking You, AltruismTo talk 05:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome

message: Hello
Any discussion on Kammanadu split into Palnadu, Velanadu and may be Renadu. I read in many blogs suggesting that.
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.74.131.120 (talk) 22:21, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kammanadu transition to Palnadu and Velanadu 

message: The inscriptions that were included were taken from Archaeological Survey of India books on Ancient Indian inscriptions.
::I added the info and list of inscriptions which are authentic historical records.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.139.94.99 (talk) 05:39, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Inscriptions

message: Not sure why you removed Kamma (caste) from the "See also" links. They are believed to originate from Kammanadu. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added it in the content, so no need of see also. Cheers!.--Vin09 (talk) 11:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kamma caste 

message: First reference to Kammanadu is found at Jaggayyapeta which is located in modern day Krishna district.
References:
# https://books.google.co.in/books?id=UDpuAAAAMAAJ&q=kammanadu+jaggayyapeta&dq=kammanadu+jaggayyapeta&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjj5MfKjMHgAhWZfX0KHbHkCvgQ6AEICTAA  
# https://books.google.co.in/books?id=CsPkAAAAMAAJ&q=kammanadu+jaggayyapeta&dq=kammanadu+jaggayyapeta&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiK7Lf_jcHgAhVDuo8KHcvOBxUQ6AEIDTAB
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Chinnaraiu (talk • contribs) 20:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see where they say that Jaggayyapeta was part of Kammanadu. Since these are snippet views on Google Books, you would need to provide quotations that support your claim. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:03, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Kammanadu stretches beyond Krishna river
Talk:Farnese Bull

message: Article says it's 'massive', but no dimensions are cited!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.217.55.102 (talk) 10:44, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added notes on the original and current size and mass of the sculpture, along with a couple of refs. Rt3368 (talk) 03:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How big is it?! 

message: I think that short of some kind of mention of this work's 18th and 19th century artistic reassessment (including that due to its substantial degree of restoration), the information is pretty okay. I fixed the Haskell reference and added the Monaco reference. Nevertheless, the content and citations could use a further shape-up. Rt3368 (talk) 03:15, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs some clean up 
Talk:Montagu Slater

message: "Stay Down Miner" was produced in 1936. J.P. Wearing  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.56.25.244 (talk) 13:07, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kurt Herbert Adler

message: How was he with the Lyric Opera of Chicago right after fleeing Nazi Austria in 1938, when that opera was established in 1952?Dogru144 (talk) 18:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Years in Chicago
Talk:Hermes Logios (sculpture)

message: Afaik, the type of Hermes Logios is exactly the same as the type of Hermes Ludovisi. Inv. 8624 in Palazzo Altemps is called “Hermes Ludovisi" at least by Rhys Carpenter ("Two Postscripts to the Hermes Controversy", AJA 58, no.1, pl.4b.). Jastrow (Λέγετε) 23:06, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hermes Logios/Ludovisi
Talk:Breitkopf & Härtel

message: I came across a book (N. I. Lobachevsky, Pangeometrie, W. Engelmann, Leipzig, 1902,  available on http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=umhistmath;idno=ABR5311) in which B. & H. is on the last page listed as the printers.
TomyDuby (talk) 04:49, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only in music publishing? 

message: Hi I owen a  Baby Grand Piano made by Breitkopf & Hartel
Leipzig/ made in Leipzig ,Germany Years old 157 or 159 Only two in USA
 Made in 1837 or 1840 Made of Rosewood, In WW2 1943 the factory was hit
 by an air raid and burned down and nothing survived.
I'm trying to find out more info on this piano anyone please email me
wilmas28@yahoo.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilmas (talk • contribs) 18:54, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antique Piano Collectors
Talk:G. Schirmer, Inc.

message: Apart from a spelling fix (dependant -> dependent) and the removal of paragraph breaks, the sections about the History of the company and Composers published by the company appear to be word-for-word copies from History of G. Schirmer—which clearly displays the note "Copyright © 2006 G. Schirmer, Inc. and Associated Music Publishers, Inc." Since this could be a copyright violation, and one which I don't have time to fix right now, I'm bringing it to the attention of those with an interest in the article. A tag was recently added because of concerns about point of view and advertising style, so some expeditious rewriting should help to address all of these issues. —Error -128 (talk) 18:50, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No response, so I'm reverting the edits concerned. Please feel free to reintroduce any material, suitably rewritten to address the above issues. Thanks. Error -128 (talk) 01:56, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright and advertising issues 

message: G. Schirmer, Inc. published the following female composers, whose names have been removed from the article:
* Geni Sadero (source: https://books.google.com/books?id=7iwhAQAAIAAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&printsec=frontcover&pg=RA2-PA170&dq=Geni+Sadero&hl=en#v=onepage&q=Geni )
* Cora Decker Sargent (source: Stewart-Green, Miriam (1980). Women composers: A checklist of works for the solo voice. A reference publication in women's studies. Boston, Mass: Hall. p. 63. ISBN 978-0-8161-8498-9.)
* Harriet P. Sawyer (source: Stewart-Green, Miriam (1980). Women composers: A checklist of works for the solo voice. A reference publication in women's studies. Boston, Mass: Hall. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-8161-8498-9.)
* Margaret Vance Shelley (source: https://www.esm.rochester.edu/sibley/search/?cx=017635508489857654250:f_j2n8ddilk&cof=FORID:11&q=margaret+shelley+vance)
* Fannie Morris Spencer (source: https://books.google.com/books?id=TG0zAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA174&dq=fannie+morris+spencer+schirmer&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjd5ZmxzJiAAxVQEVkFHfpbCJAQ6AF6BAgKEAI#v=onepage&q=fannie&f=false)
* Mabel Madison Watson (source: https://books.google.com/books?id=hQA8AQAAMAAJ&q=mabel+madison+watson&pg=PA300#v=snippet&q=mabel) p. 378
* Mary Wiggins (source: https://books.google.com/books?id=tlEhAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA570&dq=mary+wiggins+schirmer&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiy0aqQ0ZiAAxXmMlkFHSW7BBgQ6AF6BAgMEAI#v=onepage&q=mary%20wiggins%20schirmer&f=false)
T. E. Meeks (talk) 15:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is not a list of the composers published under the company. The current individuals named are a small representative group of prominent names (which I've just trimmed further). Prominent female composers such as Frank, Tower and Du Yun already appear here. Aza24 (talk) 16:49, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Female Composers Published by G. Schirmer, Inc.
Talk:Mirvarid Dilbazi

message: ADR wasnt founded until 1918, she was born in 1912.Hajji Piruz 22:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Who said she was born in ADR? and who wrote that? and did someone allege that? sometimes you behave strange.Ateshi-Baghavan 23:46, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why did you say that she was born in Azerbaijan? This person was born in 1912.Hajji Piruz 23:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Zondi, can we find a better photo of her? I tried to fix article and some re-arrangements, but still, with poor photo this article looks poor.Ateshi-Baghavan 23:46, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll see if I can find a better photo. Thanks for the idea. Zondi 00:50, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Jesmonite

message: Named after Jesmond Dene. (Claim made by the original product developer )  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.168.140.221 (talk) 11:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That would need a source before it could be added. Why is a material sold from Shropshire named after a park in Newcastle?   It's not the stonemason who was based in Jesmond Dene in the mid-80s is it? Andy Dingley (talk) 11:26, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of name
Talk:D'Anna Fortunato

message: Much of this page has been copied and pasted from here. --Kleinzach 00:00, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, other versions of this text are here and here. --Kleinzach 00:03, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy and paste from Bach-Cantatas.com

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:34, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Dominic Cossa

message: I have removed the following from the Sources section main article added by User:GianniSchicchi:
* From my personal knowledge as Dominic Cossa's son. These facts have been verified at the source, and edits were made by Gianni Cossa (June 27, 2008). Much of David Hamilton's info was correct, and in many instances my edits were cosmetic in nature.
This type of note does not belong in the article and personal knowledge is not a valid source for a Wikipedia article. I also reverted those "cosmetic" changes which did not conform to the Wikipedia Manual of Style as well as an unsourced quote (attributed to The New Yorker but with no author, date, or page number) Voceditenore (talk) 12:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: November 2010
Talk:Francisco Araiza

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.bach-cantatas.com/Bio/Araiza-Francisco.htm plus direct translations of http://www.neue-stimmen.de/meisterkurs/dozenten/francisco-araiza/ and several sub-pages of http://www.franciscoaraiza.com. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Voceditenore (talk) 06:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: I have stubbed this article to remove the copyvio and am adding inline citations to independent sources. Another advantage of this is that it has removed the unencyclopedic puffery which has plagued this article from the outset. Araiza is a very distinguished opera singer, and the previous puff-piece detracted from his reputation rather than enhancing it. I have also removed the tag noting that this article could be expanded from Francisco Araiza on the Spanish Wikipedia because that article has no inline citations and is sourced to websites which are not independent of the subject. It may also contain copyvio. I suggest using the information in the Spanish article as a starting point for research but do not use it as source of text. Voceditenore (talk) 06:46, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Much the best approach to this article. Thanks for doing it. --Stfg (talk) 10:11, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Harry Theyard

message: I've removed the following VDM Publishing reference:
* Harry Theyard, edited by Dismas Reinald Apostolis, Dic Press, 2011.
See: VDM Publishing#Wikipedia content duplication and Amazon.com controversies#Sale of Wikipedia.27s material as books.
°°Playmobilonhishorse  (talk) 01:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Dic Press]], [[Crypt Publishing]],  [[Alphascript Publishing]],  ...
Talk:Zuni Café

message: The current draft of the article gives two different dates -- 1979 and 1987.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.250.33.170 (talk) 04:13, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was the restaurant founded? 
Talk:Jayne West

message: Jayne is well deserved of a page.  The current page has good content and beyond decent professional links.
She should be noted for her dedication to the Holocaust Song Cycle Songs of Rememberance or Testimony of Witnesses.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.242.167 (talk) 22:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled