lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bruce McLaren

message: May we assume that his daughter's name is Amanda? PlaysInPeoria (talk) 04:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I've restored the statement that Amanda is his daughter. It's supported by the existing references, and her name is relevant because she is a brand ambassador for McLaren and is one of the trustees of the Bruce McLaren Trust. DH85868993 (talk) 06:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daughter
Talk:Ibn al-Jawzi (disambiguation)

message: could someone past here the content of this page before being deleted? --Striver 05:35, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Adefunmi

message: Shouldn't the title be his full name? Tfine80 03:57, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't see anything here about neutrality yet, even though the article is obviously laudatory. The only possible problem is that some people (frankly, including myself) would see this fellow as a charlatan and tip the article too far in the other direction with an ensuing tug-of-war.WQUlrich (talk) 22:33, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute?
Talk:Lip augmentation

message: Pictures? Before, After, and Overdone lips should be here.
63.164.201.71 04:00, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: images

message: This article makes many statements without citing sources (liquid silicone injections being harmless, for example).  As a reader, I doubt the credibility of this article in its current, take-their-word-for-it form.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.32.146.80 (talk) 02:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources needed 

message: I understand that Wikipedia tries to report facts rather than change them. Nevertheless, from the pictures I have seen, the term sucker pucker would be more appropriate. I have yet to see fat lips on a trout. Squawfish and suckers occasionally hit flies and those mouths do look more like human mouths with overblown human lips.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.138.9.164 (talk) 00:46, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trout pout?
Talk:Vakhtang I

message: The article says that Vakhtang sought aid from Justinian I, but Justinian wasn't emperor until 25 years after Vakhtang's death...
:The contemporary emperor at the time would have been Zeno. Can anyone confirm if Zeno was the emperor Vakhtang sought help from? Abou 21:40, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gorgasali and Justinian?

message: The use of the terms "Iran" and "Iranian" for what was Persia and Persian at the time is an anachronism and not the norm in scholarly literature. 2001:1716:4604:4B00:ED1B:534C:1C85:1570 (talk) 02:01, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Incorrect. - LouisAragon (talk) 23:15, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Iran" rather than "Persia" 
Talk:Marie de Rabutin-Chantal, marquise de Sévigné

message: This article needs big cleaning up. The 1911 Britannica is not a very good source for many things. --K.C. Tang 04:07, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How would anyone know if the destroyed letters were signed or not?  How would anyone know the total number of letters if most were destroyed?  What's the source on that?  At any rate, it's oddly stated as is and should be corrected in line with the facts.--LeValley 07:50, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does not make sense...the unsigned letters section 

message: Her letters are made mention of in Willa Cather's fine novel Death Comes for the Archbishop. The letters are amongst the last readings of the archbishop in his final days along with the works of Pascal and St Augustine. 2603:7081:5101:8DE:6454:16F6:F408:E7C3 (talk) 15:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention in Willa Cather
Talk:Blackmar-Diemer Gambit, Halosar Trap

message: I've run through the moves a few times, and i fail to see why white has an advantage after 12 Nf3. black is up by a pawn, and the pieces that white has managed to develop are guarded precariously by black. perhaps a little more explanation is in order--69.136.244.138 04:22, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is hardly a trap, 7...Bg4? is a blunder. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 18:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  It is in the reference.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 20:20, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

message: Unless there is more to come on this, it would seem that this should be merged into the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit article. Jkmaskell (talk) 18:55, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the articles in :Category:Chess traps should be merged with the parent openings, and this is no exception. Cobblet (talk) 20:39, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: How would that improve the encyclopedia? Quale (talk) 00:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: By making things not seem more notable than they really are. Cobblet (talk) 01:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there even a reliable source for the name "Halosar Trap", i.e. something in print, predating this wikipedia article and preferably not written by Eric Schiller? MaxBrowne (talk) 01:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

text: The alternative (which I'm not opposed to) is to simply delete this article about a non-notable trap in a non-notable sideline of a fringe opening played only by club players.... MaxBrowne (talk) 01:11, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference for the name and analysis is in the article, Burgess 1997.  Burgess found it notable enough to write about, although Wikipedia must make its own determinations. Quale (talk) 02:14, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with main B-D G article?
Talk:V for Vendetta (film)

message: "the film centres on V (portrayed by Hugo Weaving), an anarchist and masked freedom fighter who attempts to ignite a revolution through elaborate terrorist acts, while Natalie Portman plays Evey, a young, working-class woman caught up in V's mission and Stephen Rea portrays a detective leading a desperate quest to stop V."
Shouldn't this be written as "... a revolution through elaborate terrost acts, while Evey (portrayed by Natalie Portman), a young, working-class..." The way it is currently written sounds like Natalie Portman is a character in the film.
I don't have the ability to edit it since it's semi-protected. So if someone else feels the same and can, they should. 98.19.56.89 (talk) 23:10, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: . WanderingWanda (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrasing 

message: FATE (V.O.)
                    Good evening, London.  It's nine
                    o'clock, the fourth of November in
                    the year 2019 and this is the voice
                    of Fate broadcasting on 275 and 285
                    of the medium wave.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtpascoe (talk • contribs) 08:02, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That script is obviously not the one for the final film and as such no better than any other fan theories. If you search for it on the site, it will even tell you that it's an early draft. Regards SoWhy 12:45, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Setting

message: Should we categorise it as a 2005 or 2006 film? This edit from September changed the release year to 2006, although the film's first major premiere was in late 2005 followed by a wider release in 2006. —Jonny Nixon (talk) 13:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't think preview screenings should determine when a film is released, especially the butt numb a thon or whatever. It's like counting executive screenings as a release date. It should be the theatrical/digital debut date only. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 13:28, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

text: It came out in 2005. Case closed ShockwaveFPS (talk) 07:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "Case closed" is a funny way of saying "I'm wrong" when the official website says 2006 nyah. The only places I can see it as 2005 are IMDb and AllMovie which both accept user edits. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 09:49, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like 2005 may be correct per MOS:FILMYEAR, which states, "List films by their earliest release date, whether it be at a film festival, a world premiere, a public release, or the release in the country or countries that produced the film, excluding sneak previews or screenings." DonIago (talk) 13:52, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 or 2006 film?
Talk:Stonewall Attack

message: i think that this artical would benefit greatly by running down an example opening, with the black moves included, and a breif analysis thereof. this would give people a better understanding of how black would react to the stonewall attack (perhaps both an amature and a master), and how white can turn the "well timed bishop sacrifice on h7" into real gains. --69.136.244.138 04:34, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good memory. I've added the article as a reference and the sample game.  Bubba73 (talk), 14:37, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Is attack really the correct name for this opening. I know it as simply the stonewall. SunCreator (talk) 00:20, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Oxford Companion does call it the Stonewall Attack when played by White.  It is under the entry Stonewall though, but that includes by white or black.  Bubba73 (talk), 03:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attack? 
Talk:Bernwood Forest

message: I have added a couple of references - there are also a number of web links, so no longer appropriate to describe page as unreferenced. Roy Bateman (talk) 14:03, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Boomer Kuwanger

message: I see no reason for this not to be a part of Mega Man X (game).  Boss robots are not given their own pages and there is not enough unique information to have it's own page. DirectorStratton 04:46, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
:There is enough unique information, but this article definitely isn't it, and I agree that it should either be merged or deleted. --Boco XLVII 17:24, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps an article with all of the bosses and mavericks from the X series would be helpful especially if it were complete with images, specs, and any other information. Neum 02:34, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Mail fraud

message: Content literally lifted without attribution on a link farm site: http://www.fraudwatchernetwork.com/website/mail-fraud.html
JavaWoman 04:47, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot find any copyright notice on http://www.fraudwatchernetwork.com/website/mail-fraud.html which presumably means it is not copyleft, but is standard copyright.  Does that make this automatic copyvio? Tedernst 05:47, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Of course it does. At least in the Netherlands every written work is automaticaly copyrighted, unless the owner explicitly copylefts it. This does mean that this would be a copyvio. Nazgjunk||(talk) 18:12, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyleft violation 

message: www.ThinkJessica.com - Kittybrewster  ☎ 16:47, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: UK Campaign
Talk:Ayyavazhi Trinity

message: This page is warned for speedy delition right from the time I started editing it.The reason presented it was the lack of references.I replied that this particular religious phenomenon is not developed and the religious texts were not been translated to any language from Tamil.So again I request that if any one likes to delete I will be happy if it was performed after a series of discussion with the Users familier with this topic.  - Vaikunda Raja
:Wikipedia is not the place to create notability.  Is this a new religion? - Chairboy 04:54, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Split Second (game show)

message: I have a question that's been bothering me lately. I'll play out the situation as best I can. Going into the Countdown Round, Marvin has $255 and needs 5 answers to win. He gets those 5 answers and picks up a total for the front game of $1570. How much money does one get in the Countdown Round and add it to their score going in to make up their final total in the front game? Maple Leaf fan '04 15:42, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I may have figured it out after seeing a clip of it again. I believe it's the money the champion has accumulated over his/her appearances that make up the kind of total shown above. Maple Leaf fan '04 15:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

text: To be honest, I was wondering about that myself (I watched the episode on PageOClips.com)..  That's the only conclusion I could draw; that it was the total of all five front game victories.  Professor2789 22:03, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Countdown Round Question 

message: I was searching on the UCLA's website, and discovered that they have 9 episodes of 70's-era "Split Second". Maybe someone with better writing skills could add this to the article. Retro Agnostic (talk) 09:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 9 Episodes of 70's-era "Split Second" exist at the UCLA

message: The 2023 Bonus Round is called the "Final Countdown". Shouldn't the name be added in the round's description?! TMD2021 (talk) 13:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023 Bonus Round
Talk:Italian battleship Leonardo da Vinci

message: sources:
http://www.ussmissouri.com/Battleship-Italian.htm and
http://www.hazegray.org/navhist/battleships/ital_dr.htm
Zeimusu | (Talk page) 04:55, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
Cause of loss
Many Navies of that era lost one or more ships due to magazine explosions when not being fired at.  Almost certainly this was due to instability of the propellant used in the shells (cordite or equivalent)which could spontaneously decomplose in a run-away reaction.  Many Navies tended to go for a less technical diagnosis of sabotage, but they were almost certainly wrong (remember the Maine ?)
:But how many of those ships (including the Maine) are later found listed as sunk by sabotage in documents seized from the office of an enemy nation's spy master? That would tend to lend credence to the claims of Austro-Hungarian sabotage. I am, of course, referring to the incident in 1917 in which Italian operatives broke into the Austrian consulate in Zurich, broke into the safe of a known intelligence operative, and seized documents confirming that the battleships Leonardo da Vinci and Benedetto Brin had indeed been sunk by Austro-Hungarian saboteurs. (Taken from Charles W Koburger Jr's The Central Powers in the Adriatic, 1914-1918: War in a Narrow Sea). To use your example, that would be the equivalent of finding documents proving the Spanish were responsible for sinking the Maine after all. SpudHawg948 (talk) 22:38, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Misa Shimizu

message: tanashi reference is [here.  ja.wikipedia article on tanashi-shi is here. Nateji77 04:56, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:I Like to Move It

message: I'm Removing my statement,because, after some reserch, turns outI misinterpited the lyrics.The Republican 02:28, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Explicit lyrics?

message: I think we can all agree that an encylopedia is not a lyrics repository.  Hopefully, this should suffice for the time being.  -- Miwa * talk * contribs ^_^ 21:02, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: How is it that this song was recorded in 1994 and released in 1993? LlVORll (talk) 14:31, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Date Error

message: I can not find anything.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.75.148.2 (talk) 16:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who are the girls/dancer von this famous hit? 

message: it like to clap your hand move it move it everybody 2400:AC40:600:DE06:1938:B3C5:7D3D:DCDE (talk) 15:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  reel 2 real I like to move it move it feat kadoc clap your hand
Talk:Pyruvic acid

message: This page desperately needs a chemical structure diagram... Ed Sanville 05:19, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of Life: Devoid of oxygen gas or oxygen molecules??

message: I say we merge these beasts, hopefully increasing the length and depth of the product along the way. Someone get a molecular sketch in, too. mastodon 22:58, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: By definition a theory of evolution cannot be about origin. Evolution is about change in that what already exists. (212.187.69.100)
: I'm inclined to agree, the positing of the origin of life relates to abiogenesis, but I don't know what the adjective for that is. 92.5.140.104 (talk) 10:25, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Current evolutionary theory on the origin of life

message: Image is wrong because it shows pyruvic acid, not pyruvate  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.21.28 (talk) 15:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently, the article is named "pyruvic acid" and I think the chembox info is for acid as well. The confusion perhaps comes from the fact that all links pyruvate have been redirected to pyruvic acid.--Chibibrain (talk) 18:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Which image are you referring to, specifically?  If you mean :File:Pyruvat.svg which is used in the infobox, it is correct.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 00:44, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pyruvate image

message: Basic information to add to this article: which vegetables contain high levels of pyruvic acid. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 01:25, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Rescue 911

message: I compiled the ratings for each Rescue 911 episode for its original airing.  I also added a table will the full season ratings and ranks.  I was not able to find any quick, easy info on the full season ratings for seasons 1-3, so I used the 'ranking so far' number given by the newspapers on the week that the ratings season ended.  Could someone who has access to a source that lists the full season ratings for all programs in 1990-1992 double check those rankings, and add the rating numbers? Allgood2000 (talk) 12:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ratings

message: A few years back I read an article that claimed that calls to 999 declined as a result of Australians getting the emergency number mixed up because of the show. Can anyone in Australia confirm this? I wanted to add this tidbit to the article, but I am not sure. - Hoshie  05:34, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rescue 911 and Australia
Talk:Yukon–Charley Rivers National Preserve

message: This article is based on text from a National Park Service page (). "Information presented on this website, unless otherwise indicated , is considered in the public domain."  --Joel7687 05:41, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Article being rewritten to discard public-domain material, as extensive PD is avoided in the present climate. Acroterion (talk) 13:11, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dan Emmett

message: The Virginia Minstrels didn't perform in Boston until after performances in New York City. I've provided some citations referring to the New York origins. Declair (talk) 17:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: location of Virginia Minstrels premiere

message: Song titles are in quotes, per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (titles). Please read that document before reverting. — BrianSmithson 12:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song titles 

message: Umm, what? Is either of these dates well documented? Jim.henderson (talk) 18:37, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the Army, 1836-1835
Talk:Aprotic solvent

message: Aprotic solvent should NOT be redirected to the page protic solvent, it is the opposite. Aprotic Solvent is one without an hydrogen atom that is able to leave the molecule. Anat 05:59, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If you disagree, it should be placed on Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. -JJLeahy 17:52, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Aprotic solvent and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 6#Aprotic solvent until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:06, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Aprotic solvent" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Category talk:Laos stubs

message: The reason why Laos articles should be double-stubbed in this way is that there are not yet enough stubs to reach criteria for a separate Laos-geo-stub template or category, but WikiProject Stub sorting uses the geo-stub categories to determine when there are enough stubs to create new categories. Listing the stubs in both the Laos category and the Southeast Asia geography category allows three groups of people to find the articles easily:
*People editing Laos articles;
*People editing geography articles;
*Stub sorters checking the number of geography articles.
If the stubs are not placed in :Category:Southeast Asia geography stubs, then the stub sorters will think that there are less Laos geography stubs than there really are, and will be less likely to deem a new separate category worthwhile. Grutness...wha? 02:28, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: SEAsia-geo-stub
Talk:Al Faisaliah Tower

message: I challenged material that was not cited, and deleted it. According to wikipedia policy. An editor restored it - one of his three such restores of uncited deleted material today - without proper footnotes. 
That is not allowed. See WP:CHALLENGE. "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source." Also -- "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing a citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." --2604:2000:E016:A700:38EE:F08:8153:25B (talk) 21:50, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restore of uncited material 
Template talk:User la

message: I have just wasted a lot of time because on 2005-06-19 16:50:10 Kbdank71 removed one reference to :category:User la-N but not both of them. 
If you think :category:User la-N is not needed, please: remove both references and provide a link to the CfD decision, either here or in the edit history. -- RHaworth 20:00:10, 2005-09-07 (UTC)
I have now found the vote (you should still have provided a link to it). The conclusion was "no consensus" - so let's keep it for the nine jokers who claim to speak it like natives. -- RHaworth 20:16:14, 2005-09-07 (UTC)
Old CFDs:
#Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_August_31#Category:User_la-N – No consensus
#Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_September_7#Category:User_la-N – Keep
#Wikipedia:Categories_for_deletion/Log/2005_September_29#Category:User_la-N – Keep
There was consensus at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 27 to merge the category and redirect the template from Native to Professional, . – Fayenatic London 09:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Category?
Talk:Kings Contrivance, Columbia, Maryland

message: According to all official sources.  I'll try to correct it if no one objects;
requires renaming the page... 63.239.69.1 19:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I did this. --GregU 23:32, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's "Kings" without the apostrophe 