Talk:Humanist Movement

message: The page needs a disambiguation header. The term "Humanist movement" is used much more often to refer to secular humanism than to this cult. Dadge (talk) 16:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation 

message: I'm not sure about the section title. This section is intended to document those organisations and individuals that accuse the Humanist Movement of being a sect in order to ensure a balanced page.  If there are any better ideas for the section title then be my guest.
:After Tony's additions to this section (excellent work!), I changed the section heading. Tedernst 14:46, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict with the environment 

message: I started a page that's since been moved to Mario Rodríguez Cobos.  Silo goes to grain silo.  The Tomás Hirsch page now goes directly to the right place and the grain silo page points to the Cobos page from the top as a disambiguation link. Tedernst 15:29, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silo 

message: :Image:Humanist party moebius logo - white on orange.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Humanist party moebius logo - white on orange.gif

message: :Image:CoC Logo-eng-med.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:57, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:CoC Logo-eng-med.jpg

message: :Image:Logo-comunita.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:33, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo-comunita.jpg

message: Somebody needs to step in and do something about this page, as it is totally NPOV. This organization has obviously taken it over and are using it to recruit. Note that posters above talk about "getting our stuff" into Wikipedia. Here in Spain they are considered to be a cult, and I see no reflection of that fact anywhere in the text.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.33.158.121 (talk) 19:48, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  These guys are a cult 

message: I have just removed a line from the article under conflict with organisations as follows:
"Some former members are complaining movement as a religion."
Apart from the line being strangely written the line is unsubstantiated.  Some former members may be complaining that the movement is a religion but surely it needs some kind of reference?
I've taken it out for now.  If someone can find a reference then it can be reverted and the English corrected. Tony (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion 

message: This article presents a biased pro-humanist view. Should defenitely be rewritten!--77.251.250.103 (talk) 14:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: BIAS!!

message: I have deleted some sources not allowed for Wikipedia policies (WP:BLOGS): 
*The Community for Human development ---> Dead link
*Humanoidex ---> Personal blog 
*Secta-Humanista ---> Dead link
*NoSilo! -- "dedicated to exposing and denouncing Silo's 'Humanist Movement' cult" ---> Personal or group blog
--Whatsupchap (talk) 21:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not acceptable sources 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Humanist Movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080820092355/http://www.ex-silo.org/index.php to http://www.silo.net
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified