lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The '92 Demos

message: :Image:92demosblue.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:21, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:92demosblue.jpg
Talk:First Canadian Place

message: Why is there a link to the Hockey Hall of Fame listed here?  The Hockey Hall of Fame is located at BCE Place, NOT First Canadian Place! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.106.21.230 (talk • contribs) 
:That's true.  So I have removed it, as you could have done. -- Slowmover 21:01, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Petronas Tower[s] in Malaysia, Kuala Lampur is the answer in both cases.Gary Joseph 00:18, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hockey Hall of Fame

message: Not true, Sudbury Ontario has the 2nd tallest structure in canada (smokestack 1200ft tall) and some radio masts are taller than FCP in hamilton, therefore the word "structure" falsifies the following statement: "Making it the second tallest structure in Canada".
Although, FCP could be deemed the second tallest building in Canada, since the CN towers official record states that it is the tallest frestanding structure and building on land.
Patrick Goulet 03/24/07
:Okay. Then this means that FCP is the third tallest free-standing structure in Canada, after CNT, and INCO. But I do not care what the marketing people at CNT say, it is not a building. If it were, it would be the tallest building in the world and the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat has not officially given it this title. Is it not enoung to be the tallest free-standing structure?Gary Joseph 20:20, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Second Tallest Structure in Canada

message: The article states the building was contructed in 1976, yet, the infobox and category state 1975. NorthernThunder 10:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Also, the number of elevators stated varies - which number is correct? 74.121.44.25 05:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elevators 

message: much overshadowed by the WTC terrorism, wasn't there a small cessna like plane that flew into the BMO tower in 2001/2002?  I remember reports that a bit of the cladding was damaged, am I going bonkers here?  I thought this was relevant in the timeline of things. 80.152.143.221 (talk) 06:55, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  9/11 like incident?
Talk:Newfoundland and Labrador Route 1

message: Are these exit numbers actually signed? --SPUI (T - C) 13:41, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I know they're not in the Rand McNally atlas, but they are signed in the field and are on the province's official map and MapArt. Kirjtc2 14:36, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The history of the road in NL is missing, as is that for the more recent Labrador route. Rwood128 (talk) 21:17, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? 

message: I know the junction list on this article is titled as exit list, but it be expanded to include all the at-grade intersections Route 1 has with other provincial highways, such as Route 480 or Route 100? BDAN88 (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  At-grade intersections
Talk:Binary opposition

message: Merge with dichotomy?--BMF81 22:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with dichotomy?

message: The first sentence attributes this concept as a subset of critical theory, but I fail to see why that's necessary or what that means.  Not even the Wikipedia page has a coherent description of what the hell "critical theory is".  Isn't binary opposition just a concept of logic?  In other words, the fact that atheism and theism are in binary opposition has nothing to do with the jumble of meaningless academic jargon that is supposedly critical theory.  --LakeHMM (talk) 03:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "critical theory" 

message: This article fails to understand structuralism (and semiotics), in terms of its proper formalism (and difference from Hegelianism). Dx/dy is not contradiction...reciprocal determination is not negation... the authors clearly are not able to think outside "identity"... quite common in people educated by anglo-saxonic academic "language games" and "form of life" (be it because of "analytic phislosophy"'s bias, be it by reading it in terms of "literary theory")...
To understand deconstruction you should try first to understand constructivism...binary code, boole (and Cantor set)...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.92.156.247 (talk) 01:33, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of understanding about strcturalism 

message: I have added an original research maintenance tag because I think that the literary examples are instances of original research. The two examples do not cite any sources, and look like a part of an essay to me. If there is a source that can be found, please add one, or else they would be removed. Zamaster4536 (talk) 11:42, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I trimmed it, as per OR. We could add specific examples from literary texts, but they need to be referenced.Zigzig20s (talk) 20:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research in literary examples?
Talk:Wilmcote railway station

message: Article rewritten 26.06.06. Was this one of those "trap" articles, written just to see how long inaccuracies survive in the Wikipedia? 
*Far from being "a hamlet" "consisting of a handful of houses...", Wilmcote has a population of at least 1,200 plus church, hotel, pub, club, village shop, etc.
*Wilmcote railway station is not, and never has been, a "request stop".
*There has been a station here since 1860, not "c. 1910" 
*Mary Arden, etc. material removed (covered in Wilmcote article)
*Next stations info in text removed (covered in infobox)
--Picapica 13:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rewritten
Talk:Castile

message: Last changes made the disambiguation less exact , itroduced clear errors and were not justified with a summary. I vote for the restoration of the former definitions unless some clear reason is given.--Garcilaso 18:55, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Every blurb comes directly from the linked articles' ledes, if you have objections you may need to take it up with the editors of those articles first (since disambiguation pages are generally not the most appropriate forum for content disputes). Ewlyahoocom 19:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Even the new order puts the most anecdotically linked terms first!--Garcilaso 18:57, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there something wrong with having the places in spain in one section, and the other places are in the following section? Forgive my ignorance, but what does "anecdotically linked term" mean? Ewlyahoocom 19:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes did not improve the disambiguation

message: Okay, I'm confused... what's d.C.? Is that supposed to be AD or C.E.?Saffolicious (talk) 07:36, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  d.C.?
Talk:Racing stripe

message: No real person believes stripes are fooling anyone into thinking they have a faster car, or believes that they stripes actually make their car faster.   Rather that is a pejorative accusation; i.e. a straw man. Unless somebody can cite a source...  I think you could find a source to show that "go faster stripes" is used as a pejorative, but not a source to prove that the victim of the insult actually deserves it.  The article makes it sound like such straw men are real.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbratland (talk • contribs) 20:20, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose rewrite of whole "go faster" explanation

message: The article Car body stripes has been created and really needs merged into this one.  How many pages do we need on paint stripes? Scottanon (talk) 17:28, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from 

message: The Morris Dictionary of Word and Phrase Origins says rally stripes originated simply to identify competitors. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:42, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rally stripes 

message: I always thought the dual thick white stripes was something started by Shelby with his Le Mans winning Ford GT40, and continued with Ford's racy models. You see it on Mustangs, the European Ford sporty cars and also the recent Ford GT.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.174.216.109 (talk) 11:36, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Shelby used them heavily with their racing team and the Shelby GT350 was the first road vehicle to use the stripes. It has been noted in the article. F-16 Viper (talk) 07:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Are the dual central stripes not related to Ford/Shelby?

message: I'm removing the information on The Perishers comic which has been unsourced for many years. I tried to look up information on it to use as a source but I couldn't find anything. F-16 Viper (talk) 07:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Perishers Go Faster stripe.
Talk:Shannon Whirry

message: Cleaned this entry up a bit as it was a little too explicit for Wikipedia standards. Count Ringworm 13:57, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Too explicit

message: How do you pronounce Whirry?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.153.79.183 (talk) 22:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Worry --Shylock's Boy (talk) 23:18, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronouncation 

message: Sorry but I didn't know what else to call it. The revision added an unsourced middle name and un-WL'd WL'd words for no good reason (they certainly weren't mentioned in the comments). While it wasn't exactly vandalism, the edits were wacky. Hondo77 (talk) 18:25, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The edit wasn't even close to vandalism. The name change was correct, and meshes with previous versions of the article. You should have no problem finding a source. If you feel that it requires a source nonetheless, a good solution would be to fix it yourself, or to  it. A couple of the wikilinks were clear WP:OVERLINK, the others are debatable, which should be done in cases where editors disagree: talk. The lack of edit summary didn't make things simpler, I agree. A note on the user's talk page is generally a good way of resolving questions like this. If you are unsure about what to call an edit, just state so, nobody can fault you for that. Happy editing, Paradoctor (talk) 19:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  So-called Vandalism 

message: This has been bugging me for a while.  Our article says that she was in the film Everything Must Go as a nurse.  I've watched the film a 2-3 times now and I do not see her.  I also don't see her name in the credits at the end of the film.  Come to think of it, I don't even recall a scene with a nurse.  Everything Must Go appears to have been added to the article on May 4, 2022 with this edit.  Is she really in this film?  If so, what scene is she in?  Or what timestamp does she appear?  
I am pinging/notifying the top 10 editors of this article who have accounts:, , , , , .  A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 15:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know for sure. I bet that, since it was shot in the Phoenix area, she was in a scene that ended up on the cutting room floor. Feel free to remove it from her page, IMHO. Hondo77 (talk) 14:59, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in Filmography? - Is she really in Everything Must Go?
Talk:Books of the Vulgate

message: Someone deleted the Deuterocanonical books from the KJV column. These books were found in the original edition of the KJV and should be included here. See the third paragraph of Notes and the article Books of the King James Bible. Rwflammang 14:01, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This is not correct information! The King James version of the bible only hass 66 book, just like most other protestant bibles. 2600:1010:B11A:ED7A:7996:3BF9:9E4C:962D (talk) 21:33, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The King James Bible
Talk:Zoo (file format)

message: There needs to be mentions of ZOO 2.10's "new" license (no longer public domain) regarding minimum distribution charge, the slower speed of 2.10 (and added high compression), STUFF, FIZ, SEZ, LOOZ, which archivers ZOO was competing with (DWC, ZIP, ARC), ZOO's derivation from AR002 (like LHA, ARJ, UC2, ZIP), the third-party multi-volume-file ZOO (never did get incorporated into a new ZOO), plus the various bugs (e.g., 32k cluster size on Win95 messes up extraction? see comp.compression). I'm no authority on these things, but I'll try to update this info here later (if no one else does first).
Armslurp 14:01, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ZOO had some niche successes, but it wasn't able to make much headway in the MS-DOS world at the beginning of the 1990's (when the compression archive format situation was in flux), partly because its compression speed on a 10 MHZ 286 system was almost an order of magnitude slower than PKWARE products... AnonMoos (talk) 21:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: TODO

message: The difference is one of endianness... AnonMoos (talk) 20:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A7-DC-FD-C4  vs. DC-A7-C4-FD
Talk:Strong Poison

message: Could someone please remove the solution to the novel (ie. the killer's name) from the literary reference section. I just wanted to check information on the book, and it ruined it for me.
:I'm afraid Wikipedia doesn't do spoilers, so you need to assume that in any article about a work of fiction you may come across revealing details about the plot and/or characters.  Karenjc 19:41, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Primate of New Zealand

message: Should this page be moved to Primate of the Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia? See Talk:Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia. — Gareth Hughes 14:06, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: Who exactly is the metropolitan of "Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia"? I get having three tikanga whose heads are given the rank of archbishop (is this the same as "archbishop ad personam"?) but current use of the actual title "Archbishop of New Zealand" is not in any of the sources linked to at the end of the article!
My (possibly incorrect) understanding after reading the article suggests 
*that the heads of the three tikanga are given the personal rank "archbishop" and titled "Co-Presiding Bishop"
*one of them is chosen to lead the province (that is, become the metropolitan of)  "Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia"
*that metropolitan archbishop carries the title of primate.
(I too am exhausted at having to think of fiddly stuff like this)
Also I support moving this page to a different title, or merging it with the main page at Anglican Church in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia (since in the NZ Anglican church context the "primate" mentioned in this article is the head of that body). 118.90.109.178 (talk) 03:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  None of the sources mention an "Archbishop of New Zealand" 
Talk:Peter Scolari

message: The article called Bosom Buddies "another short-lived cult sitcom," which I have changed to "another sitcom."AlexanderSoul (talk) 19:27, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  trimmed a few words 

message: Basic information to add to the text of this article: Scolari's ethnic heritage. Is he Italian American? If so, why isn't that mentioned in the text of the current version of this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:52, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article
Talk:Health technology

message: This page should be linked/joined with Biomedical engineering. In my opinion the list of applications in this page is far too short and the field is progressing very rapidly nowadays. Also, links to pharmacy faculties shouldn't be on the page. user:193.167.242.101
::I agree with you.  Ecoman24 (talk page) 19:31, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biomedical engineering 

message: Looks like there might be a need for a global health technology article (currently redirects here). II | (t - c) 02:00, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It was meant to be a global article, but someone moved it to the more specific title because it was insufficiently inclusive of other perspectives.  The result was some strange redirects.  I've moved it back.  The article needs to be expanded. WhatamIdoing (talk) 19:28, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global should come before regional 

message: This seems odd. I am looking at the Artificial intelligence in healthcare page. AI is a technology. It is not a special thing, it is just a technology. So shouldn't the AI page be merged into this one? This page is older, so it seems that this page should have the AI page merged into it.
On the other hand, the AI page gets more love. Both of these pages show many edits in the last year or so, but the AI page shows more edits overall, even though this is older. Is it just the AI aficionados who are driving this? I cannot tell.
But it does seem very duplicative to have two big pages, one being "AI in healthcare" and another being "Health technology in the United States". Unless the AI article should be merged into a "Health technology" page that is not US-specific. Because, after all, none of these is a US-only topic. So. It is not clear. Any thoughts?
RayKiddy (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Page or "Artificial Intelligence" Page?
Talk:Katholikentag

message: This article is currently being translated from :de:Katholikentag by User:CheNuevara. Expected time is unknown, but hopefully it will not take very long.
As translation is a very complicated process, please understand that, if you edit this article, I will probably set aside your edits for incorporation into my text after it is finished. This is not to say that you should not contribute to this article -- it simply means that, if your text disappears, don't panic: I'll put it back when I'm done.
My current work on the article will be found at my sandbox if you'd like to look at my progress and make suggestions.
Thanks! -  Che Nuevara:  Join the Revolution 14:18, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Article no longer under construction. Go wild, folks. -  Che Nuevara:  Join the Revolution 15:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Under construction -- translation

message: Lil Xculfeez is a Zambian artist based in lusaka 
His real names are BENSON KUNDA he was born in 2001, September 10. He started rapping when he was 12 years then he made it out official in 2018  July that’s when he made is first song titled tripping which featured AQUALASKIN. ’PRODUCED BY D JONZ
And it was realized at 19th July... 
After that LIL XCULFEEZ did his second song titled CAN’T DO IT Produced by EAZYTHEPRODUCER
. the song is talking about self motivation lil Xculfeez is a lyrical genius.  Lil Xculfeez (talk) 09:28, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is lil Xculfeez??
Talk:List of Los Angeles television stations

message: The article should probably follow the format of the one of San Francisco Bay Area television stations, which provides a complete listing of the stations and then brief discussion on the history of the major stations.Sallyrob 17:43, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 2603:8000:F3B:A2A0:544D:FD27:B1F7:F163 (talk) 04:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Unblock the edit please, 2603:8000:F3B:A2A0:544D:FD27:B1F7:F163 (talk) 04:33, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

text: Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 09:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 July 2022 (2)
Talk:Philadelphia (disambiguation)

message: Proposed addition to "Philadelphia (film)" note:
five Academy awards, including best music, song nods for Bruce Springsteen's "Streets of Philadelphia" and Neil Young's "Philadelphia." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eh Nonymous (talk • contribs) 
*I like the idea. --evrik 14:35, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed addition 

message: I moved the Filadelfias to their own disambiguation page (which already existed) 83.146.15.165 (talk) 18:08, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filadelfia
Talk:Live (Built to Spill album)

message: Hi, , thanks for looking into this. What sources did you find to confirm WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM? I can only see the Allmusic (which includes lots of non-notable albums, aiming to be far more comprehensive than an encyclopaedia and a primary source/press release, which can confirm information in the article, but can't confirm notability. Thanks for yuor help, Boleyn (talk) 08:58, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There were already lots of reviews in reliable sources (Pitchfork, NME, etc.) when you converted the article to a redirect. I have also added reviews from the Washington Post and the Austin Chronicle, among others. These articles seem to satisfy NALBUM's first criterion, which requires that it "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it." Everymorning (talk) 13:28, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Dorian Baxter

message: I agree with Outbackthekoala about the material added by DAB as being presented with weasel language, but think it should be added back minus the POV slant. This lawsuit was one of the most important for exposing misbehavior by CAS and since it lasted 11 years it spans a good section of this man's life. It is probably worthy of its own section.Daffydavid (talk) 04:49, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree this new info can be included, but it would have to be completely rewritten. I didn't agree with anything the user tried to remove with no explaination, so at this point we should add in this new material, while not removing anything including references already provided. Outback the koala (talk) 18:57, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle with CAS 
Talk:Town Called Malice

message: Has permission been granted to reproduce the lyrics for this song? Knaw 14:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Lyrics are copyrighted so I removed them from the article. Garion96 (talk) 00:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Why exactly is FIFA 2004 trivial? As far as I know it's still pop culture
Upoorde (talk) 01:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide citations to reliable, secondary sources discussing it. --Muhandes (talk) 07:22, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fifa 2004?