Talk:Bill Viola

message: I'm removing the section about what he keeps on his night table.  It's frankly embarrassing to see something that self-celebratory in Wikipedia, and neither Mr. Viola nor probably anyone intimately familiar with his bedroom should be editing this page. Msalt (talk) 22:33, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No reason to believe it was someone "intimately familiar with his bedroom".  User:Sal29 added it based on this interview; he or she failed to use a ref tag to clearly cite it.  But I agree that it doesn't really fit in the article.  --dave pape (talk) 22:46, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bedside reading materials?!?!? 

message: I've added a sourced line to the lede and removed the unsourced one. Given Bill Viola's place in the history of electronic media I realize my addition somewhat understates his position in the art world and is a step down from the sentence I removed . I hope to do some  work on this article and hopefully can add material that will explain Viola's position without becoming grandiose in any way.(olive (talk) 19:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I like the change.  Better to err on the side of understatement and documentation on such a subjective issue as his stature in the art world.  These things go through fashions, and the whole point of art should be to get past that. Msalt (talk) 19:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to lede 

message: I believe that more clarification or supporting references are needed in this section.  I feel that much confusion can be generated by your statement, "...This form of data structure pertains to pure or mostly randomness."  You have not, in this subheading, explained what you mean by "randomness," let alone "pure randomness."  You even continue on to end this section with the sentence, "All randomness."  This extremely short sentence only adds to the confusion of what has failed to be mentioned beforehand.  Please clarify these claims.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RazorXX8 (talk • contribs) 06:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: On reading this section, I believe it should actually just be removed. Or a very much shortened reference to it should be included in the 'Art Work' section. It seems to float in the page without context, and is far to long-winded. Levcampbell (talk) 13:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Viola's Three Structures

message: This section, while being useful, as a whole it is almost entirely opinion, and unreferenced. While I think it important to have section which provides a critical context, I recommend the section as it is be removed and completely re-written, with ciritical discussion of his work only coming from referenced academic sources, such as the various histories of video art that include discussion of Viola's work - of which there are several, not to mention the plethora of academic papers. We shouldn't have unreferenced opinion here, no matter how insightful. Will anyone attempt this? I'll have a crack at it myself, if in a few weeks time if no-one else has, and if there are no objections. Levcampbell (talk) 13:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't mind having something with more references and less opinionated as you say, but I wouldn't delete the section until such content is ready to be published. Also, if you can write something better, go for it as it might take time for someone else to do it. GuzonjinSin (talk) 23:37, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whole 'Art Work' section - should it be removed or re-written? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bill Viola. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091217105002/http://www.jamescohan.com:80/artists/bill-viola/bio to http://www.jamescohan.com/artists/bill-viola/bio/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090517082851/http://www.gencat.cat:80/pic/eng/index.htm to http://www.gencat.cat/pic/eng/index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726065836/http://on1.zkm.de/zkm/mnk/archiv/Stations to http://on1.zkm.de/zkm/mnk/archiv/Stations
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061205052500/http://sfmoma.org:80/espace/viola/fr_splash.html to http://www.sfmoma.org/espace/viola/fr_splash.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303190130/http://www.mediatecaonline.net/mediatecaonline/SConsultaAutor?ID_IDIOMA=en&ope=3&criteri=Viola,+Bill to http://www.mediatecaonline.net/mediatecaonline/SConsultaAutor?ID_IDIOMA=en&ope=3&criteri=Viola%2C+Bill
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061208024455/http://www.jamescohan.com:80/artists/billviola/index.html to http://www.jamescohan.com/artists/billviola/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120323074735/http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/ntw-mla000127-bill-viola-s-space-between-the-teeth to http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/ntw-mla000127-bill-viola-s-space-between-the-teeth
*Added  tag to http://openvault.wgbh.org/collections/ntw-the-new-television-workshop%20New%20Television%20Workshop
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120323074731/http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/ntw-mla000230-bill-viola-s-reverse-television to http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/ntw-mla000230-bill-viola-s-reverse-television
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061205025052/http://nationalgallery.org.uk:80/exhibitions/bill_viola/ to http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/exhibitions/bill_viola/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070518141748/http://news.independent.co.uk:80/people/profiles/article90795.ece to http://news.independent.co.uk/people/profiles/article90795.ece
*Added  tag to http://www.cacmalaga.org/exposiciones/2008/billviola.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080507132316/http://www.designboom.com:80/eng/interview/viola.html to http://www.designboom.com/eng/interview/viola.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090517082851/http://www.gencat.cat:80/pic/eng/index.htm to http://www.gencat.cat/pic/eng/index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110617112540/http://on1.zkm.de/zkm/artists/Viola to http://on1.zkm.de/zkm/artists/Viola
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Bill Viola. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.jamescohan.com/artists/bill-viola/bio/
*Added  tag to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n8_v50/ai_n27531833
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://sfmoma.org/espace/viola/fr_splash.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mediatecaonline.net/mediatecaonline/SConsultaAutor?ID_IDIOMA=en&ope=3&criteri=Viola%2C%20Bill
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.jamescohan.com/artists/billviola/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110831144554/http://openvault.wgbh.org/collections/ntw-the-new-television-workshop to http://openvault.wgbh.org/collections/ntw-the-new-television-workshop
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://nationalgallery.org.uk/exhibitions/bill_viola/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.independent.co.uk/people/profiles/article90795.ece
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.designboom.com/eng/interview/viola.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gencat.cat/pic/eng/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: At least one major contributor to this article appears to have a close personal or professional connection to the topic, and thus to have a conflict of interest. Conflict-of-interest editors are strongly discouraged from editing the article directly, but are always welcome to propose changes on the talk page (i.e., here). You can attract the attention of other editors by putting  (exactly so, with the curly parentheses) at the beginning of your request, or by clicking the link on the lowest yellow notice above. Requests that are not supported by independent reliable sources are unlikely to be accepted. 
Please also note that our Terms of Use state that "you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation." An editor who contributes as part of his or her paid employment is required to disclose that fact.  
Note: while this is phrased in general terms, I've placed it here for the particular attention of anyone representing or connected with Blain Southern, whose relentless self-promotion in this project really needs to stop (or be stopped). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest