lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Sexual harassment in education

message: Parties,
 hasn't edited now in around 50 days; for all purposes, he/she is inactive and will probably not take any part in the mediation. Again, my apologies for the delay in assigning this case.
In light of this, are there issues between you two—Student7 and Eceresa—that need to be sorted, or are you two mainly on the same side and Koala06 being the main dissenter to you two? Unfortunately I wasn't able to determine this from a glance at the talk page, and would prefer to recieve your confirmation.
Basically, given Koala06 won't be taking part (by the looks of things), is mediation required to settle any issues between you two, or are you two largely in agreement about all this?
Cheers, Daniel (talk) 06:35, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. I believe when there are differences between Eceresa and myself that we can work them out with each other and the other editors without mediation. Student7 (talk) 11:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parties list
Talk:List of RNA structure prediction software

message: Maybe this should be separated into secondary and tertiary structure prediction programs to make it more informative?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.135.78.129 (talk) 18:15, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Secondary and Tertiary??

message: All links are dead :(  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.111.25.75 (talk) 22:19, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The data was moved onto another server. Replace 'people' with 'projects' in the links and it should all work. --Paul (talk) 18:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: BRalibase

message: What do you guys think about including RNAG? http://ccmbweb.ccv.brown.edu/cgi-bin/rnag.pl  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.126.224.122 (talk) 21:36, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: New Program
Talk:Prosek, North Macedonia

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved to Prosek, North Macedonia. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 13:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 October 2021
Talk:Scupi

message: There are sources on internet that say that Scupi was a Dardanian settlement that was turned into Roman colony. This is not confirmed by the archeological excavation in Scupi even though it is found as reference on internet. That internet reference is not verified by the archeologists and don't write it in the article. The archeologists only assume that Scupi was built over a camp of two Roman legions that was erected after the Macedonian-Roman wars.
In any case, the possibility that the Romans built a coloniae over an existing settlement without any sources and included local population is dismissed because of the coloniea title itself. The coloniea settlements were new settlements and inhabited only by Romans. If the Romans built a settlement with the local population they would have named it municipium as it is the case with Stobi. (Toci (talk) 17:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dardanian fix

message: The triumvir Crassus (which is linked here) was long dead at that time, and so was at least one of his sons. Perhaps his grandson ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Licinius_Crassus_(consul_30_BC) ) is meant here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9E8:A3F7:A300:5B9B:588E:BE6E:A053 (talk) 21:53, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crassus' army of 29- 28 BC?
Talk:Stobi

message: I changed the place name to its correct form.-Getas75 (talk) 17:39, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gradska = Gradsko 

message: Was of ~ 2nd-4th centuries AD. See: http://www.stobi.mk/Templates/Pages/Excavations.aspx?page=176. Drz (talk) 07:57, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient synagogue of Stobi
Talk:Barkuhi

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 09:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Toše Proeski Arena

message: Dnevnik newspaper
"Точниот превод е „Philip II of Macedon“, а не „Filip II Macedonian“." 93.219.227.184 (talk) 04:29, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct translation "Philip II of Macedon"

message: The most common used name is 'Philip II Arena', so I will move the page to that name. The full official name 'Philip II of Macedon National Arena' will however stay in the box. Icaf (talk) 01:39, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to new title

message: Whether you can lock this article for the unregistered users, because the same is under constant attack by vandalism, please? Jolicnikola (talk) 03:38, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locking the article for the unregistered users 

message: This page needs to be moved. Because, the name of the arena changed to Toše Proeski Arena.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MkEditor12 (talk • contribs) 11:26, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving this page to Toše Proeski Arena 
Talk:Mogilino

message: This page confuses the village of Mogilino with the home for disabled children in the same village and the documentary by UK director Kate Blewett about the home.
I would suggest to move all these in different topics or join them with existing articles about these topics
193.194.140.210 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 13:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  multiple topic page 
Talk:Kim Ji-soo (actress, born 1972)

message: Article has solid content on subject's career, qualifying it for a start, but could certainly bear remarkable expansion, particularly in the content regarding the subject's personal life. John Carter (talk) 21:17, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved.  – robertsky (talk) 20:58, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Kim Ji-soo (actress) →  – Dab from Jisoo, who  * Pppery * it has begun... 20:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 March 2024
Talk:Upper Egypt

message: This article has been subject to a large spate of vandalism.  For example, on 5 November 2008, IP editor 98.229.245.167 added the sentence Upper Egypt is on the Western side of the Nile River, which runs over 4,000 miles long., the first part of which is patently false, and the second part of which is rather irrelevant to the article.  Yet, this sentence remained in the article for over six months. On 1 March 2009 Petrus tried to fix the vandalism of 67.185.179.113from 27 February, but left an incoherent sentence as a result. When you edit, please check the article over for recent vandalism. Thanks. --Bejnar (talk) 21:35, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: A certain wikiuser4020 has been inserting cherrypicked sources often of methodologically outdated studies to support positions in defiance of the scientific consensus against the black Egyptian hypothesis throughout numerous articles about ancient egypt, I move to revert. 75.131.101.131 (talk) 23:32, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikiuser4020
Talk:New Cairo

message: There is an advertisement on this page.
Nhgrrl (talk) 12:00, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems fixed now. -- OlEnglish (Talk) 07:58, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

text: The 'strange' weather described in the article is normal in almost every desert. --عبد المؤمن (talk) 15:50, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 

message: I destubbed this article during Africa Destubathon.Level C (talk) 03:24, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Africa Destubathon

message: افضل دهان بويه بالرياض 0551770850
عامل الدهان في الرياض يكون رخيصًا إذا كان هذا هو ما تبحث عنه، يجب أن تدرك أن معيار التكلفة ليس دائمًا معيار لخبرة وكفاءة عامل الدهان نفسه. رغم أن معظم عمال الدهان ذوي تكلفة عالية، إلا أننا حرصنا على توفير أفضل عمال الدهان بتكلفة أرخص وأعلى مهارة وخبرة. نسعى لإرضاء عملائنا بدون النظر إلى أي تكلفة إضافية لخدمة الدهان. إمكانياتنا تساعدنا على توفير جودة عالية وسرعة وأسعار منافسة لاحتياجات عملائنا. لدينا أنواع ممتازة من الدهانات ذات الألوان المبهجة والعصرية، وتتميز بسهولة التنظيف والصمود لفترات طويلة دون التلف. نعتمد بشكل أساسي على تقنيات الدهان الحديثة التي تضمن عملية الدهان بدون أي عيوب في وقت قصير. هذا ما يساعدنا على تقديم خدمة الدهان بتكلفة منخفضة على الرغم من ارتفاع جودة الخدمة وخبرة عملائنا. 2absherllingaz (talk) 21:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  افضل دهان بويه بالرياض 0551770850
Talk:Večer (North Macedonia)

message: Could this article be renamed to Večer (Skopje) or the city in which it is published. Because there is also a daily newspaper published in Maribor, Slovenia by the same name. Similar has been done with Dnevnik (Ljubljana) (Skopje) etc. Rokpok (talk) 22:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Al Rehab

message: Removed. If there exist tensions between communities of different nationalities in Rehab it should be discussed here whether we need to add a section. The comments re Somalians involved violent first person opinion and a number of unverifiable claims that appear but casual and deeply ill-intentioned. 41.232.60.21 (talk) 08:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism re 'Somalians'

message: Rehab city is no longer under "Helwan Governorate".Count Shafik (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:37, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Location
Talk:Trinity (comic book)

message: Please tell me we're not going to get a week-by-week breakdown of the story.  General outline, sure, but two paragraphs covering the first week?  That's about right for the first couple of months. Duggy 1138 (talk) 19:50, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm still seeing way too much material being added to the synopsis.  It's a synopsis of the entire series, not the issues. Duggy 1138 (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Once the story concludes, we'll be better able to compile the story into something more concise. As for now, we have to deal with what we have since we don't necessarily know what is and is not important. InsaneZeroG (talk) 06:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story (as of week one) 

message: Sorry, I'm not really a Wikipedia person, but I just read the Trinity series and looked it up here to try and clear up a few things, but this article is in need of some major editing.  First, the Plot section needs to be finished (right now it only goes about halfway through the second volume) and heavily cut.  I don't really know what you guys would be looking for so I don't want to do it, and I don't have a Wikipedia account.  But the Plot section needs to be fixed badly.  Second, the thing that I'm confused about is where does this series fit into the DC universe history?  Is it in relation to the Crisis series at all?  or is this just a thing that they did that doesn't really follow the real story or real lives of the superheroes and the history of the multiverse.  Third, I wanted to know what other people thought of the comic series, like critics and stuff, and how its been received in the comic-book-reader community.  This page is badly outdated, and doesn't cover a lot of important things that a Wikipedia page ought.  I would recommend scrapping the whole thing rather than leaving it as is. (98.209.42.35 (talk) 18:19, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Edits Needed 

message: Just a thought, but since the series has concluded, are there any plans to add a critical reaction section to this article?  It seems that it would be a relevant addition.  TorgoSensation (talk) 01:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical Reaction
Talk:Reva Rice

message: Please, if anyone has any informantion on Reva Rice, could they Post it? ElphaPearl (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't you go look up some information on google yourself?  Belle pullman (talk) 23:51, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have tried. Very little information exists, and what I have found, I don't know if it is correct. 62.136.149.6 (talk) 19:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And that might suggest she is not notable enough to have an entire Wikipedia article dedicated to her.  Belle pullman (talk) 19:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have some information. Coming soon. ElphaPearl (talk) 17:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does Anyone have a picture of her, maybe as Pearl? ElphaPearl (talk) 13:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: I read an interveiw with her online, where she actually says that this song was written for her she joined the cast. this often happens with shows for example, the song 'No good deed' was written to display Idina Menzel's range in  Wicked. Should this information be displayed? (About Reva, not Idina!) 84.69.59.101 (talk) 21:08, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say no, unless you can independently verify the information.  There were many revisions made to Starlight Express for the Broadway production, but that does not mean that the song was written specifically for her just because she was Pearl in that production.  It's a flattering spin for her to say Lloyd Webber wrote the song for her, but because it's her saying it I would take it with a pinch of salt.  If Lloyd Webber has mentioned he wrote the song especially for Reva Rice, then add it.  Belle pullman (talk) 23:14, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make up my heart
Template talk:Infobox botanical product

message: 74.92.157.113 (talk) 14:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Also note that this is the page for suggesting improvements to the page Template:Infobox botanical product. If you're requesting a change to another article, please make your request on that article's talk page. --ElHef (Meep?) 15:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 April 2014 

message: Isn't it wrong to have the text 'botanical name' before the name of the product? A botanical name is a name of a plant, not of a product. Also it is not really clear to me why this parameter is obligatory, since the name of the product is usually also in the header of the infobox. Bever (talk) 22:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The old situation was so obviously wrong that I decided to be 'bold' en changed it to 'product name'. Bever (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Botanical name
Wikipedia talk:Facts precede opinions

message: I like the notion, and think we should consider inclusion into WP:NPOV.  — Xiutwel ♫☺♥♪ (speech has the power to bind the absolute) 21:24, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem is, it's often nearly impossible, or even completely impossible to check an actual fact. I can straightforwardly (in most cases) check reliable sources. Therefore this idea is impractical, it results in an unverifiable wikipedia. I'm pretty sure it was deliberately avoided for that reason when they started writing the wikipedia.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 00:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

text: The other problem is it assumes that people act reasonably. If people don't (and there is no incentive to for people that strongly believe something) then you end up with 'facts' in the wikipedia that are not facts. There would be no way to force people to act reasonably, and you couldn't make them cite.- (User) Wolfkeeper (Talk) 00:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

message: "FPO" is a bad choice for a mnemonic acronym, as WP:FPO redirects somewhere else. Perhaps the info in this essay should be with the info in the essay WP:FACTS; saying that if a fact is cited it should not be presented as an attributed opinion. It should be presented as an attributed opinion when significant published dissenting opinions exist (attributed examples of such dissenting opinions should also be presented, of course, IAW WP:NPOV). -- Boracay Bill (talk) 22:32, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "FPO"
Talk:Bernie Malone

message: The electionsireland.org website has entries under each of these names. The first entry is that of a Labour politician who, it would appear, was only ever a candidate for the Dáil; the second, that of a (female) Labour politician who, it would appear, stood only in local and European elections. The local and parliamentary contests all seem to have taken place in the Northside. I invite comments from all those with specialist knowledge: is there a story here? If so, what is it?
I spotted this odd coincidence when looking up the 1987 result from Dublin North in Irish Politics Now (Brandon/RTÉ, 1987); the figure named in the tables of the DN article as 'Bernard Malone' is called in that book 'Bernie Malone'. That could be a clue, a transcription/typesetting error (of which that book is not short, I admit), or possibly neither. Harfarhs (talk) 22:22, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just checked the Irish Times archive. Bernie Malone was elected to the council in 1979, and appears to have been chair of the council in 1984, so I think all of these must actualy be Bernie Malone. David Malone (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:42, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks for taking the time to check the archive, David. It won't surprise you that I suspected exactly what you conclude, but of course I couldn't act merely on suspicion! As well as inviting comment here, I shall attempt to contact the manager(s) of electionsireland for their input. Harfarhs (talk) 22:27, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bernard Malone/Bernie Malone 
Talk:Oceans of Fun

message: Now that WOF and OOF are combined parks (not separate gated anymore) should these articles (WOF and OOF) be combined?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.92.235.116 (talk) 20:54, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Its really funny that the "history" section contains only future developments! 47.64.239.93 (talk) 19:32, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "History" 

message: First reference is not a RS but it is talking about 5 years ago now so it needs updating either way.--WatchingContent (talk) 20:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blogspot not reliable
Talk:Beauchamp–Sharp Tragedy

message: I added the IPA pronunciation of the name Jeroboam O. Beauchamp, since it's not obvious how to pronounce either name, esp. the last name.  I'm not sure whether IPA is appropriate here; an alternative would be "English phonetic" spelling like "jair-a-BOE-am OH BEECH-am" -- although this would likely confuse more than help foreigners. Benwing (talk) 06:29, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I hear this more commonly pronounced "BO-champ", but I don't know that is the proper pronunciation in this case. Also, I don't know anything about IPA, so I can't really change it anyway. Acdixon (talk • contribs • iki=wikipedia&lang=en  count) 12:06, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be interesting if someone in the know could comment.  "BO-champ" would be a more recent spelling pronunciation based partially on the French pronunciation; "BEECH-am" is an earlier spelling pronunciation from a time when most people were ignorant of French pronunciation.  I suspect "BEECH-am" was the pronunciation used at the time -- see also the comments under the Beauchamp article. Benwing (talk) 21:56, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation 

message: *31,000 hits while on the main page. –Juliancolton | Talk 17:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  TFA hit count 

message: Was this really the first legal execution in Kentucky's history?  Was absolutely nobody executed by the state between 1792 and 1826?  This sounds ridiculously unlikely, and the source doesn't help things; it's not written in a scholarly manner, it's published by a firm whose website doesn't look encouraging for this purpose, and it cites no sources whatsoever.  Nyttend (talk) 15:54, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It does seem unlikely, although I can't think of a counterexample off the top of my head. Acdixon (talk · contribs) 16:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed tag 

message: I have translated this article to Chinese Wikipedia here and promoted to FA status, and I want to thank User:Acdixon for his effort to write this amazing article. --Jarodalien (talk) 16:17, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now a FA in Chinese Wikipedia
Talk:Orange County Choppers bikes

message: In a special projects section towards the end of the article, the word Reeve is mentioned & linked; the link is to a DAB page; what is it supposed to go to?  In other words, what does Reeve mean in this context: Other theme customers include Solidworks,...Reeve, SLR.... Cheers, Lindsay 20:37, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Reeve]] 

message: The PureFit Nutrition Bars section does not reveal any facts about a chopper that was built by OCC, it states that this particular bike "ultimately led the show to its success", yet a google search does not turn up any facts about any bike having ever been built by OCC for PureFit Nutrition Bars. Did OCC truly build a bike for PureFit? If so was it featured on an episode of American Chopper?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by KnowBoundaries (talk • contribs) 00:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[PureFit Nutrition Bars]] 

message: what would be the starting price for a chopper that's not that expensive,but look difference from other bike.I would really like to know,I'm interested in have one built sir.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sexysam1951 (talk • contribs) 20:25, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  custom chopper 

message: Page says they built a chopper for "Reeve"; there is no context to work out what or who that might refer to.  Anyone know? Cheers, LindsayHi 04:57, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Reeve]] 

message: The first four references for this article link to a site which no longer exists.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.240.208.217 (talk) 05:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Studio 54 (Las Vegas)

message: What is meant by a 'strict door policy"?
Strict in what sense? 
Can anyone elaborate?
If not, I might as well remove it.
Thanks
Mark Allyn, Feb 8, 2008 Allyn (talk) 21:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  strict door policy 

message: I inquired about what is definied as as strict door policy. Nothing has been added since them. Can I remove the phrase strict door policy from the article?70.90.129.90 (talk) 03:57, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In the movie 54 the door policy is alluded to frequently, i.e. only certain people made it in the club. Because of this, I think it is relevant to leave it in for now. More research (esp. for Wikipedians in Las Vegas) is needed. -Nodekeeper (talk) 04:27, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition for strict door policy; none added; can I remove? 