lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Amusement Park (song)

message: Here is the video in good quality for Amusement park, due to Wikipedia rules - conflict of interest, I'm not allowed as owner to post this link. If you find it useful please add this link, thou. 
*50 Cent - Amusement Park Music video
Why would it get banned from MTV? --Football97 17:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Music Video
Talk:Swami Paramananda

message: When I originally submitted this article, I quoted a source that the Message of the East publication "launched in 1909 continued for 51 years."  However, I now have another source (Sara Ann Levinsky's book) that lists "Message of the East, vols. I-LIII (1912-1964)."  This needs a little more checking.NaliniL 22:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Message of the East
Talk:Šancová Street

message: I suggest not to mention ALL historical names of streets in Bratislava you can find in Horvath. This is not a names directory and not the type of information an encyclopaedia should contain.  Also, this wikipedia does not contain the same information for other streets in the world. Select the most important ones, that's more than enough. Juro 22:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I'd like to add redirects for this page (sancova ulica, šancova ulica, šancova street, etc) but I'd like to answer a different question first.
The official name is "Šancová ulica". Shouldn't this be the article title?  If we're translating "ulica", shouldn't we translate "Sancova" also (Rampart Street)?
Suggestions/insight welcome. MikeGogulski 01:55, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirects/naming
Talk:.sb

message: .sb - I understand where the S part comes from, but what's the B for?  Does anyone know? Bazonka (talk) 21:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? That makes no sense seeing how the domain name came in 20 years after independence.WisDom-UK (talk) 17:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the B for?
Talk:Cuanza Norte Province

message: Drat - no coordinates!    Tabletop (talk) 01:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drat - no coord 

message: I am looking at an Angolan government document from 2005 which makes reference to Kwanza Norte, rather than Cuanza Norte. (Likewise, it refers to Kwanza Sul and K. Kubango [for Cuando Cubango].) I don't speak Portuguese, nor am I well versed in Angolan geography and/or politics. Anyone know whether one, the other, or both spellings are considered correct? Lincmad (talk) 00:51, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling: Cuanza or Kwanza? 

message: After a long process starting way back in 2014, the spelling of names of places, rivers etc in Angola have now been defined, using their original spelling. This is not to be confused with the spelling of such names in the national languages of Angola. To end the confusion, between spelling in the official language and spelling in national languages, Parliament has passed the "Lei da Toponímia" (Toponymy Law) setting the correct spelling, as standard on which a number of other laws rely, specically with relation of human development, with placenames being assigned a system wide code based on the name of the place and the name of the province. These laws were passed earlier this year; the law on topony was approved (in Portuguese) in July. Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 13:13, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of names of places in Angola 
Talk:Murder of Jennifer Teague

message: May I suggest including in this article a photo of the mural that was done to commemorate the life of Jennifer Teague?
http://web.ncf.ca/bf250/mural7.html
http://web.ncf.ca/bf250/images/mural91.jpg
Mylesdear (talk) 13:39, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Does the mural add to the understanding of the subject? I don't see where the painting of the mural is discussed in the article anywhere. (Since the image is not clearly under a free license, we would have to have critical discussion of the mural to be able to use an image of it.) —C.Fred (talk) 13:49, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please include photo of Jennifer Teague Mural
Talk:2007 Ukrainian parliamentary election

message: News reported to day is that Ukraine's supreame court has ruled illegal the Presidnets dismissle of Ukraione's Consitutional Court Judge. I would not be surprised if there are calls for |Yushenko tto resign as his actions and interfernace in the Court is a direct breach his responsibility and oath as his actions are also unconsitutional. Rulke of Law p[revials in Ukraine (be it some what late). http://www.ukranews.com/eng/article/112528.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurtdaydo (talk • contribs) 12:00, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Court rules Yushenko's dismissel and interfernec in the Consitutional Court illegal
Talk:Hero Tales

message: the story has to be divide into two sections. First, Taitou battles Keiruo and draws the Kenkaranpu. Then, he looses it to Keirou. Second, Taitou battles shimei and forces him to retire, as the article says.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.128.165.163 (talk) 22:38, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The story is wrong 

message: The official title is Hero Tales since Yen Press licensed this manga. --Horsee (talk) 11:43, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one's objected, and since a quick google check does seem to indicate that it's more commonly known as Hero Tales now, I've made the move.--Aervanath (talk) 03:20, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: *ANN: vol. 2  DVD part 1 DVD part 2 Shelf Life DVD part 1 Shelf Life DVD part 2
*Mania.com: vol. 4 DVD part 1 DVD part 2
*CBB: vol. 4
--KrebMarkt 13:51, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs dropout 

message: I have never seen so many of those marks before. I didn't think you need a citation for a plot. Or is this like some sort of joke?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.34.23.230 (talk) 10:13, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Needed
Talk:J. Frank Wilson and the Cavaliers

message: Please add Billy Hitt as past member 96.41.201.117 (talk) 07:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billy Hitt Cavaliers Drummer missing on past members list
Talk:Bouncer (Fox Feature Syndicate)

message: As there are more titles named Bouncer in comics, propose that the article be moved per the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (comics) guideline, 
either to The Bouncer (comics) or Bouncer (Fox Features), allowing this namespace to become a comics DAB. Anyone have strong feelings and good reason why not? Murghdisc. 03:01, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there more comics titles named Bouncer?  I can't think of any, and I couldn't find any searching Wikipedia.  Konczewski 01:50, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is at least one, the :Jodorowsky/:François Boucq series simply titled Bouncer, that will imminently have a WP article of its own. At any rate, isn't this series named The Bouncer, like :The Spirit? Murghdisc. 03:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: True, but then isn't Batman usually referred to as The Batman?  Not that I oppose your suggestion.  I'm okay with renaming to "Bouncer (Fox Feature Syndicate)" or something similar.  How do we make it happen? Konczewski 13:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Batman maybe not as commonly as The Spirit. I'm not sure about The Bouncer. Once it feels like consensus after a while, it's an easy pagemove and a few link amends. Murghdisc. 15:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does appear that he was called "The" Bouncer; that's how it appears on the cover.  I vote for "The Bouncer (Fox Feature Syndicate)" the article's new name. Konczewski 15:43, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That works for me. I'll do the changes then. Murghdisc. 16:32, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Weetos

message: The information I added about sugar reduction is from email correspondance with Weetabix Ltd. I can publish the emails if it's a problem. Drumnbach 22:52, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:European Individual Chess Championship

message: Is it televised? 195.188.112.2 (talk) 03:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Televised

message: I think the following text is somewhat problematic, quote: The last opinion is curious as Alekhine (World Champion), Keres (pretendent for the title), Bogoljubow (former World Champion challenger), Stoltz (winner, ahead of Alekhine, at Munich 1941), and Junge  (co-winner, with Alekhine, at Prague 1942) made Munich 1942 the world's strongest tournament in 1942. The next-strongest tournaments were Salzburg 1942, New York (US Championship) 1942, Mar del Plata 1942, Prague (Duras Memorial) 1942, and Moscow (Championship) 1942.
1) Apart from Keres none of the other players was exactly world's top class. Bogoljubov was what, 53 years old in 1942 and was way past his prime then. Stoltz and Junge? Give me a break. 2) The fact that there were no other stronger tournaments in 1942 doesn't mean that the tournament had a very strong line up. 
Anyway I think there is a problem in giving the Nazi-organized bogus "European Championship" such a prominence in this article and I propose either removing or axing down the section to a sentence or two.  Dr. Loosmark  19:11, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right.  It's certainly a problem just on the grounds that this is WP:SYNTH and basically an editorial opinion.  If we have a source that critiques Fine's comment we could mention it and attribute it to the source.  We actually don't seem to have a source for the Fine comment either, so even though I think it's very possible that Fine did write that, it should be sourced or removed too. Quale (talk) 01:24, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Nazi tournament in 1942 

message: FIDE has the tournament results in an Excel spreadsheet linked from this page: http://www.fide.com/index.php?option=com_fidecalendar&view=archiveview&aid=206.  It looks to me like Lilit Mkrtchian (ARM) did place 3rd on tiebreak out of 9 players on 7.5 points.  Natalia Zukhova was one of the 9 on 7.5, but her tiebreak score was 9th place. Quale (talk) 03:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 Women's bronze 
Talk:Epaulette mate

message: Since this article is a stub, I think it should probably me merged into checkmate patterns.  Bubba73 (You talkin' to me?), 18:17, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Epaulette mate is quite like Swallow's tail mate. Regards, SunCreator (talk) 18:54, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge?
Talk:European Team Chess Championship

message: Is it televised? 195.188.112.2 (talk) 03:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Televised
Talk:Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

message: This article needs to be speedy deleted and recreated without "disambiguation" in the title. The Evar page can be edited to removed the redirect to Leet and be redirected here instead--pending agreement from the editors of the Leet article, of course. I'll bring it up on the talk page there. --LaraLoveTalk/Contribs 23:02, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tony Ugoh

message: I don't think it's necessary for the Redskins tryout information to be in this article. He was never signed by the Redskins, and no one was signed following the tryout. Furthermore, if Ugoh was unsigned at this moment, it may be appropriate to include this as a possibility for where he could be signing. However, since he was signed by the Lions today, it isn't necessary. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:38, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely agree.--Yankees10 02:41, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tryout with Redskins
Talk:Welcome 2 Detroit (song)

message: Wow... cleanup please? this sounds like it was written by a third grader. 70.235.17.91 23:12, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rocky Hill–Glastonbury Ferry

message: There was a long discussion about the merits of having one merged article or two separate articles on the ferry and the NRHP-listed Glastonbury-Rocky Hill Ferry Historic District, at Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Connecticut#Glastonbury-Rocky Hill Ferry Historic District.  The conclusion was, finally, to keep separate articles.  The previous discussion will probably be archived there. doncram (talk) 18:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: previous discussion of split vs. merger
Talk:Shakespeare at Winedale

message: Stub/Low Bhaktivinode 23:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Texas

message: I have added a variety of references, and so will remove the "unreferenced" content after leaving a few weeks  for responses to this comment. Rmatney (talk) 23:29, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  references added
Talk:Alapin's Opening

message: I think I added the bit about Ljubojević playing the Alapin at Groningen in 1970.  It comes from The Oxford Companion to Chess.  Normally I consider that source highly reliable, but when I looked for this game on the free databases http://chessgames.com and http://chesslive.de, I came up empty.  I don't see any evidence that Ljubojević ever played the Alapin, and of even greater concern, it doesn't look to me like he even played at Groningen in 1970.  Actually, that may have been the European Championship, and perhaps his games were in prelim rounds that aren't in the databases.  Any thoughts? Quale 06:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to my source, there is such a game, but Ljubojević played it as black ! The source is highly reliable : Encyclopedia of Chess Openings, Volume C, 4th edition, see C20, note 3, page 194. The game given is B. Jacobsen vs Ljubojević, Groningen 1970 (reference to Chess informant Nr 9/177). The moves are : 1.e4 e5 2.Ne2 Nc6 3.g3 Bc5 4.Bg2 Nf6 5.c3?! d5 6.b4? Bb6 7.ed5 Nd5 8.Ba3 Bg4 9.0-0 Nf4!! 10. gf4 Qd3! 11.Re1 000! Black has the upper hand. Goliadkin 09:58, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groningen 1970
Talk:King's Fianchetto Opening

message: ht tp://chess.about.com/library/weekly/aa05l17.htm
I'd wish people at least tried to do one search before putting on the cit-needed.   91.153.52.32 05:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No idea of the point your trying to make. ChessCreator (talk) 01:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint

message: I have added the alternate names for Benko's Opening:
*Hungarian Opening
*Barczay Opening
*Bilek Opening
I was surprised nobody had added these earlier. I thought they (especially the Hungarian) were fairly popular alternate names. Does anyone know of any others?Chesslover96 (talk) 15:33, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Names 

message: Hi. Why is this listed under irregular chess opening if it is a popular opening move?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.14.194.33 (talk) 14:50, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why listed under irregular

message: The fact is 1.g3 simply does not lend itself to concrete analysis the way openings such as the Sicilian do. Both White and Black may adopt any number of different setups and play their moves in any number of different orders. The whole "Black responses" section is rubbish, pointing to a rather useless wikibook and referring to numerous rather useless ECO codes. On top of all that, it has no citations. I'm just going to remove the whole section. MaxBrowne (talk) 07:50, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Black's responses" section looks beyond saving
Talk:Kamui (2001 manga)

message: Currently, there are two different articles for Kamui (manga) and Kamui (manga series), which feels ambiguous and confusing. Couldn't there be better disambiguation titles, such as Kamui (Nanami manga) and Kamui (Shirato manga) or something like that? 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 01:20, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Charles François (systems scientist)

message: Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed the worksection of this article for now. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 08:47, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worksection removed 
Talk:Dunst Opening

message: I removed a section on 1...a6 that said only: "If black wants to meet fire with fire (or rubbish with rubbish) s/he could try this. a6 prepares 2 ... b5 getting ready to kick the c6 knight." Reasons for removal: (1) the section gives no evidence this is a noteworthy variation (has it ever been played in a master game?) (2) it describes 1.Nc3 as "rubbish" while the rest of the article puts forward evidence that it's quite playable; (3) White's knight isn't on c6 and ...b5 doesn't attack it. In short, this section was probably just some beginner wanting to list a variation he'd tried out at his local club. 91.105.3.133 (talk) 17:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted your edit because it was a removal of material with no reason, except "see talk page" and there was nothing on the talk page at that time.  If you delete it again, I will not change it.  I leave it to others to judge, including you.  Bubba73 (talk), 17:32, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see that someone, probably the above user, has removed the section again. I agree with his above-expressed sentiments. If we have a section on 1...a6, we might as well have sections on the other 15 moves we haven't mentioned. Obviously 1...g6, 1...Nc6 and lots of other moves are playable. Many are indeed stronger than 1...a6, which is likely to transpose to the Birmingham Defence, which was strong enough to beat Karpov (see Karpov-Miles, Skara 1980, IIRC) but not much of anyone else. Krakatoa (talk) 18:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I saw an edit by an anon user removing material, with the edit summary "see talk page" and there was nothing on the talk page at that time so I thought it was vandalism, sorry.  Bubba73 (talk), 18:26, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sure, I've done that sort of thing myself, no problem. To avoid such confusion, it's obviously better form for the "deleter" to post to the Talk page before making the deletion. Krakatoa (talk) 18:40, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I apologize.  Five minutes had gone by, nothing on the talk page, and this was the IP user's first edit.  Almost always that means vandalism.  I was wrong this time.  Bubba73 (talk), 20:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

text:  Miles beat Karpov with 1...a6 a number of years ago in a somewhat famous game. 1...a6 can be played against practically any first move by White. Oddly enough this argues both for and against its inclusion here: for, because it is a valid reply to 1. Nc3; against, because it is not really specific to the Dunst opening. Black coud play 1...c6 or 1...g6 or 1...e6 etc. In fact any of these moves are OK regardless of White's first move; obviously there are too many variations to go through. I think it makes sense to delete 1...a6. Tpkatsa (talk) 15:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1...a6 

message: can we mention 1 Nc3 d5 2 e4 d4 3 Ne2 e5 4 Ng3 with Nf3 follow-up which Chessmaster 10th Edition seems to like? 220.255.1.57 (talk) 03:20, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  another line
Talk:Bogo-Indian Defence

message: I think that Bogo-Indian Defence, Monticelli Trap should be merged into this article.  Bubba73 (You talkin' to me?), 03:27, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to disagree. It seems that other named opening traps tend to have separate articles -- for instance Elephant Trap. Perhaps this is because most (and the Monticelli Trap is one of them) occur several moves in, whereas the openings articles themselves usually just give an overview of play on the first few moves. 91.107.147.69 (talk) 22:27, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: The introductory paragraph to this article used to say that the Bogo-Indian 'is not as popular as the Queen's Indian but is seen occasionally at all levels'. I've changed this to say '[...] commonly seen at all levels', which seems like a more accurate representation of the frequency with which these two openings are played.
For example, according to the online game database at Chesstempo.com, after 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 the Bogo-Indian is seen slightly more than half as often as the Queen's Indian (c33,000 games vs c64,000 games). Axad12 (talk) 17:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frequency
Talk:Hedgehog (chess)

message: If it's from black's point of view, shouldn't it be the other way around, with black pieces at the bottom?  With no objection, I'll flip it (if I can figure out how). Llamabr (talk) 20:30, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Traditionally White is always at the bottom and Black at the top of a chess diagram.  Sometimes the diagrams are given the other way, but that's unusual.  It would be very confusing to flip the board in a chess endgame since it often isn't clear where the players' home rows are late in the game, but for most openings including this one it wouldn't cause much harm. Quale (talk) 23:48, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good point.  White's usually at the bottom.  So in this case, I would suggest removing the claim "from black's point of view", or switching it. Llamabr (talk) 17:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think the caption needs to be changed to something like "Black has a hedgehog setup".  Bubba73 (talk), 20:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: This article contained some British English, many openings articles are written in British English.  Specifically "manoeuvre" vs "maneuver" (American English). (Someone changed to American; don't know if that's appropriate or not.) Ihardlythinkso (talk) 05:12, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally it isn't OK to change the national variety of English in an article.  See WP:ENGVAR for the details.  The earliest version I found of this article was in British English, so that's probably what should be used.  Quale (talk) 01:33, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thx! Ihardlythinkso (talk) 08:26, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Indian Defence

message: Does anyone has a reliable source on the history of the Indian defence (name and origin)? From what I can find with google an Indian person called Mahesh Chandra Banerji, on the net aka:
* Firstname: Mohishunder/Mohischunder/Moheschunder/Moheshunder
* Second name: Bonnerjee/Bannerjee
played it against John Cochrane in Calcuta for the first time.
A couple of links:    Voorlandt 15:52, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: > The Indian Defences by g6 coupled with d6, or b6 coupled with e6, were largely taught to European players by the example of Moheschunder and other Indians, to whom the fianchetto developments were a natural legacy from their own game.
The quoted portion seems to imply that fianchetto was part of the Indian variant. However according to the rules of the Indian variant Chaturanga, the fianchetto movement is impossible. Infact during the play the bishop can never reach the square infront of the knight due to the peculiarity of movement (two squares diagonally always). So what is this quote refering to? Is it correct?
Blufox (talk) 17:59, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fianchetto 

message: Why are there 3 White Knights in some of these illustrations? Raz.you.up 18:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone made a mistake. I fixed it. Foobaz·o< 18:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three White Knights? 

message: The Reti passage in Masters of the Chessboard is interesting but this is a second hand source. It would be better if someone can find the Kmoch source he is referring to. Just on the off chance someone has access to it, it might be in Nachtrag Zu P. R. V. Bilguer Handbuch Des Schachspiels Fur Die Jahre 1916-1929 ("Supplement to the Bilguer Handbuch for 1916-29"). MaxBrowne (talk) 08:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kmoch names 

message: There's absolutely no reference to this existing anywhere except this article and forums directly mentioning this article.
ThatChapThere (talk) 03:56, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian Attack