Talk:Thallium poisoning case of Zhu Ling

message: If the name of the person is Zhu Ling, then shouldn't the article be moved to Zhu Ling instead of Zhuling? Opblaaskrokodil 03:00, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:48, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move To Zhu Ling?

message: I think this article would benefit from a greater level of depth.  For instance, Zhu Ling did die, correct?  The article seemed a little vague on this.  Also, what did the suspect say on the internet forum that was so controversial?  If he/she was found innocent, then a proclamation of his/her innocence would seem standard, not something to cause chaos. Opblaaskrokodil 03:00, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I read in the Chinese version, this Zhu Ling did not die.  Her life was saved, but she will be lying on the bed forever in her life.  The suspect was said to have a very "solid" background in Beijing.  If you have some understanding about the politics in Mainland China, you can guess about what is happening. -- Tomchiukc 05:01, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Greater clarity

message: This "Zhu Ling" has got the same pronunciation as another "Zhu Ling" (朱靈) of nearly 2000 years ago. How are we going to distinguish the two? -- Tomchiukc 04:59, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the content of this girl to "Zhu Ling (1973)", and the 2000 years old vassal to "Zhu Ling (Three Kingdoms)".--Tomchiukc 06:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguity 

message: Since releasing her statement, the former suspect has been 
bombarded by tens of thousands of emails from angry protesters. Her 
telephone numbers, home address, email, even personal photos were 
released in public by anonymous, self-claimed people's internet law 
enforcement. Hundreds of people sent emails and faxes to the companies 
where her relatives and friends worked. Their home address, telephone 
number, personal photos, even private email exchanges were released in 
public 
---
There is no source provided for the above paragraph
"Hopes
ZHU Ling's parents still have ZHU Ling's long hair from 1995, with the advanced technology, we might be able to detect the poison patterns and timeline from her hair, based on volunteer's research, the hair amount we have now is not enough for the current Forensic Science study, but with the continue technology advance, it will!"
---
There's an unclear authoritative voice in the "we"; this information also would need citation, and grammatical clean-up.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahmcm (talk • contribs) 05:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion 

message: Proposal: move to Zhu Ling (student) or Zhu Ling (poisoning victim). "(1973)" is more appropriate for a film or event. Badagnani 18:03, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move proposal 

message: Just want to protect her privacy? It sounds like Ostrichs' logic. Her name is widely known by Chinese who pay attention on this case. The Chinese version of this article also includes her name. It's not a secret. I don't think there is a reason not to include the name. 
What about your opinions? 210.145.79.163 (talk) 17:00, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It does no good to delete or suppress the name of the suspect here or in the article, but, absent information from any reliable source that she committed the crime, inclusion in the article is inappropriate. We play only a tiny role in the harassment and abuse of the suspect; that is a global phenomenon, but the line must be drawn with respect to bald statements implying guilt. User:Fred Bauder Talk 11:24, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose, when sources are found, the way this subject is being used as a symbol of corruption and abuse by the Chinese elite, might be included. That does not justify hounding of the suspect. User:Fred Bauder Talk 11:34, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why avoiding to include the name of the only suspect? 

message: Links like these are not reliable source:
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_49c1101d0102eg4q.html
http://image.sciencenet.cn/olddata/kexue.com.cn/upload/blog/file/2010/3/201033113226569786.pdf
Neither is Usenet and bbs forum postings, such as Tianya.
Bobby fletcher (talk) 15:42, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blog and forums are not reliable sources according to Wikipedia 

message: http://www.newrepublic.com/article/113116/zhu-ling-attempted-murder-case-weibo# --119.192.173.132 (talk) 17:34, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: China Censhorship

message: Given the 2013 White House petition is included, please make it complete by linking to the petition page on whitehouse.gov.
Also, as the plain link starts with petition and is disallowed on wikipedia.org, we can use the official short url instead, which is http://wh.gov/zj2P
We should attach the link the to related text in the "2013 White House Petition" section, and in the "External Links" section.
ryenus (talk) 07:22, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: using a shortened URL to get around the URL blacklist doesn't seem kosher. -Nathan Johnson (talk) 15:43, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 8 May 2013 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Thallium poisoning case of Zhu Ling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928103248/http://www.jfdaily.com.cn/gb/node2/node17/node33/node80407/node80410/userobject1ai1259069.html to http://www.jfdaily.com.cn/gb/node2/node17/node33/node80407/node80410/userobject1ai1259069.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:16, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Thallium poisoning case of Zhu Ling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060721053136/http://www.ednes.org/telesol/materials/d7/D7_newsletter_2_english.pdf to http://www.ednes.org/telesol/materials/d7/D7_newsletter_2_english.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130422101255/http://epaper.oeeee.com/A/html/2013-04/19/content_1844139.htm to http://epaper.oeeee.com/A/html/2013-04/19/content_1844139.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)