Talk:Human rights in India

message: Please update the narcoanalysis paragraph. It has no citations and is clearly written in a bogus fashion. Moreover, narconalysis (against the will of the accused) was banned by the Supreme Court (the higher court of land). http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_supreme-court-makes-narco-lie-detector-brain-mapping-tests-illegal_1379213  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.238.84.64 (talk) 10:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other violence 

message: While I'm not doubting the validity of statements in this article they need to be moved to a more relevant section such as Caste in India, or Economic status of minorities. Human rights refers primarily to things like freedom of speech, religion etc and not to economic status. Muslims, Dalits, OBCs are poor but that's for another article. If they are also oppressed (by the state or by other groups with state support or lack of legal enforcements) for being Muslim, Dalit etc then that comes under human rights —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.199.177.246 (talk) 20:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  OBCs, Dalits and Sachar Committee report 

message: A third opinion was requested.  My first opinion would be to ask the two editors to stand-down for a few hours to cool-off.  Then I suggest that the IP user make all of his/her clerical edits and the contact Ghanadar and request him/her to review those.  After you both can achieve consensus on those issues, lets' tackle the alleged copyright violation.  In the interim, I don't see a gross violation which requires immediate action, if at all.  Cheers! --Kevin Murray (talk) 01:10, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, but why don't you let him make the minor clerical changes and then you and I can verify his work.  It looked like he has a keen eye for grammar and spelling. --Kevin Murray (talk) 02:46, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Third opinion is not as formal as mediation etc.  It is a first step in problem solving.  I'm happy to help where I can to keep this on track and if it seems ot get out of hand I'm happy to help with involving stronger remedies.   At this point I have no bias in the topic, just a bias toward offer good accurate information to our readers.  --Kevin Murray (talk) 03:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion

message: This article doesn't address any women's rights or gender issues in India. I think this would be important in understanding the human rights situation. This came to mind after I looked at Panoramio pictures of New Delhi and realized that there were many more men out on the street than women. I'm not sure if this is accurate or just a coincidence, but I think more information on the situation of women in India would help me especially, and maybe others who are curious. Paxuniv (talk) 02:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women's Rights 

message: The articles on human rights in India produce half-truths and,quite shockingly so,seem to shift most of the blame for religious violence in India on Muslims...Including the 2002 Gujarat massacres!Also,the issue of human rights in Indian Administered Kashmir are downplayed.All of the incidences of rape,burning down of villages and massacres of innocent civilians are summarized as follows;
"Several international agencies and the UN have reported human rights violations in Indian-administered Kashmir. In a recent press release the OHCHR spokesmen stated 'The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights is concerned about the recent violent protests in Indian-administered Kashmir that have reportedly led to civilian casualties as well as restrictions to the right to freedom of assembly and expression.'"
THERE IS NO MENTION OF VIOLENCE COMMITTED ON PART OF THE INDIAN ARMY AGAINST THE KASHMIRIS!!!
Sadly,we can't edit these articles,update them or make them more realistic.That is,to remove the facade of peace and tolerance the 'socialist' republic of India displays,and the unfair imagery of Pakistan being a hostile state wherein minorities have no rights.This is no fair,even though we can produce proper references and verifiable sources,including UN reports.Squeezing the entire story into one pitiful sentence leads to,as in its Pakistani counterpart,implied misinformation.the only difference in between the two being that the Pakistani article damages the Pakistan's reputation unlike in the Indian article,wherein it serves to honey India's reputation
and the implied information contained therein is severely misleading(example sighted above).The real reason women's rights in India is not mentioned is because their plight in the villages would have to be mentioned and in rural areas there are few rights for them.While urban women are somewhat liberated and work,rural women are mostly treated as a commodity....the current trend of farmers selling their wives to make ends meet is proof of this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hassanyusufmian (talk • contribs) 17:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Severe and Unchecked Bias 

message: Are there any significant government censorships regarding incidents of government policies and/or forces vs regional or ethnics groups? Such as against the Sikhs and the Kashmirs? MOre info plz Children of the dragon (talk) 11:10, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any Government Censorships? 

message: LGBT Rights
Until the Delhi High Court decriminalised consensual private sexual acts between consenting adults on June 2, 2009,
should read 
Until the Delhi High Court decriminalised consensual private sexual acts between consenting adults on July 2, 2009,
Please change to July 2, 2009
Thanks
Sridhar Rangayan
210.89.41.145 (talk) 05:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 210.89.41.145, 3 December 2010 

message: 14.96.193.118 (talk) 03:06, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Rights in India 

message: 14.96.193.118 (talk) 03:06, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Rights in India 

message: I'm copying this information over from the source article so that discussion can be centralized here. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:20, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the merge.  After I removed the unreliable sources, or misrepresented sources in the other article, very little was left.  As such, I think it needs to be merged in here.  Qwyrxian (talk) 02:20, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Yep, merge. - Sitush (talk) 11:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Yes, me too. Do the merge. Jeff Ogden (talk) 14:31, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Support: Joyson Noel Holla at me! 15:52, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Support. Makes sense. Shovon (talk) 15:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Support, although I think the same info also belongs in Law enforcement in India.  I can put it there as well after this merge is (likely) completed.  Qwyrxian (talk) 00:14, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: All done.  I'm not going to merge it into Law enforcement in India right now, since they were never informed of the discussion; I'd want to find a way to not just duplicate the info, so I'll worry about it later. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:43, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Hi 
I am holding british  nationality. I have  got one child baby daughter. I have to leave my daughter in india in care of my elder sister for study . Now my sister and my ex husband made my daughter against me . I was the one who was looking after fiancialy and visiting her every year. My sister took so much money  from me and forcing me to grant her as my daughter,s mother which will help her to come to england with her whole family. On my refysal my sister made my daughter against me. I went to the Royal court of justice in uk but i have to agree my daughter, wishes to study n india. i have not seen my daughter for last 3 years. She was 11 years old whe taken away from me.
Any help
Manju  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.59.52 (talk) 13:03, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, but this page is only for people having discussions to improve the article on Human rights in India. We aren't specialists in law, and so can't really advise you. Technically, you can ask at the WP:Reference desk, but since you're basically inquiring about legal advice, they probably won't be able to help. You'll need to contact a lawyer in India. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother,s rights 

message: , instead of making separate section only for muslim women, please make section for "Women rights", that will be better, and kindly write shortly, don't make sub-sections within it, see other sections, they are written very short but fruitful. Kindly make changes in you recent edits or it will get reverted, it is not upto standards of wikipedia or requirements of this article. No need to go through history, just mention current situation of Muslim women in 4-5 lines and reliable sources, and write about non-muslim women also. Thank you. Cheers --Human3015 00:47, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muslim women's rights 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Human rights in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive {newarchive} to http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/photo.cms
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Human rights in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090116211632/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com:80/photo.cms? to http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/photo.cms
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:35, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Human rights in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721221055/http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2010,1034.html to http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2010,1034.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140214120404/http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php to http://rsf.org/index2014/en-index2014.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070912235435/http://news.sbs.com.au/dateline/index.php?page=transcript&dte=2002-04-03&headlineid=427 to http://news.sbs.com.au/dateline/index.php?page=transcript&dte=2002-04-03&headlineid=427
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:08, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Human rights in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/stories/20070209001909400.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070706074246/http://www.hinduonnet.com/folio/fo0007/00070240.htm to http://www.hinduonnet.com/folio/fo0007/00070240.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2010%2C1034.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150930230930/http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2009%2C1001.html to http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2009%2C1001.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Human rights in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081202171820/http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1912/19120450.htm to http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1912/19120450.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Human rights in India 2402:3A80:1616:E89B:CEB2:B4FF:98AD:D7C1 (talk) 12:27, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human rights in India 

message: There has been unduly high attention given to the 2 riots and many of the other post independence riots are completely ignored or have been given less attention.
For example, 1984 riots have been given way less coverage than 2002 riots. This is despite the fact that 1984 riots victims have been systematically denied justice by the subsequent congress govts. The number of deaths in Anti Sikh riots is also downplayed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Factpineapple (talk • contribs) 06:53, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unduly high weightage given to CAA riots and 2002 riots  

message: Please elaborate the rights of a disabled person and Autistic person.
Notably, Indian government and different public sector and railways, use ableist language such as 'mental retardation' in spite of public petition. The railways repeatedly forbid assistance for intellectual disabilities which are not immediately appearing.There are complaints that in spite of formally diagnosed disability certificate, those person with hidden disabilities are repeatedly  fake-claimed by government officials. Also in order to get a disability certificate or a support, there are a TOLL of Gatekeeping practices. Self diagnosis also heavily shamed by professional. Because professional bodies and doctors held a belief that they understand more than the patient. 
Indian constitution ensures fundamental rights for race and religion, but do not ensure fundamental rights for disability. Disability is seen as a disease, and not as an identity. People are forced to get "corrective measures" (Such as ABA/ Antipsychotics/ conversion therapy) instead of accepting people as they are. Eugenics is sometimes taught in college and university zoology and genetics courses where Eugenics is shown in a positive light. 
2409:40E0:1035:5930:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 04:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disability rights