lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Birgit Radochla

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 00:41, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Scott Chisholm

message: Two of the entries are to deleted articles, but they technically meet MOS:DABRL as they are linked to a couple of articles. I was unsure whether the footballer should be the primary with this as Scott Chisholm (disambiguation) or if the links to del pgs should just be removed? Boleyn (talk) 20:35, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up
Talk:Henrietta Ebert

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 18:23, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:34 equal temperament

message: "This makes 31-et a poor system for incorporating the 7th harmonic." The 31-et is an excellent system for the 7th harmonic.  I think you meant that the 34-et was a poor system.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.17.34.25 (talk) 13:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it, but you could have done that yourself. — Gwalla | Talk 20:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 7th harmonic

message: Why are random intervals in the Interval size table shaded or darker than other intervals in the table? Hyacinth (talk) 18:04, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Interval table shading
Talk:Akira Miyoshi

message: I deprodded the article because the subject meets the requirements of WP:MUSIC as a noted twentieth-century Japanese composer. He's even had a dissertation published about him. Chubbles (talk) 19:39, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod

message: Since the subject has died, shouldn't the "Biography of Living Person" Template at the top of this discussion page be removed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hosiyukibin (talk • contribs) 
:WP:SOFIXIT--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:00, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Living Persons Template
Talk:Bang on a Can

message: Hello all.  I am interested in cleaning up and expanding the Bang on a Can Wiki page.  I have started by adding some references and making a few updates to the page.  I'm also planning to move the performing ensemble "Bang on a Can All-Stars" to its own entry since it is a distinct entity from its parent organization whose mission is much broader and is not simply a performing ensemble, but is primarily a producing and presenting organization.  I am fairly new to Wikipedia.  I've reviewed all of the posting and editing guidelines, but if I'm still doing something technically wrong, please post here and let me know how I can improve the quality of my edits.  Thanks!
Squarecandy (talk) 17:27, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bernard Zweers

message: is in D and dates from 1881 (http://www.concertzender.nl/programmagids.php?date=2007-04-07&month=-25&detail=22702 ) - can be heard at that link. I have no further information, though. Schissel | Sound the Note! 10:09, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Symphony No. 1

message: Can someone tell me who is Huyschenruyter? He/she is mentioned in the paragraph talking about Zweer's humour. 
I tried researching myself, however all I get is stuff about porcelain, and when I add "composer" or "concert overture" to my search, it just shows me websites copying the information from this article. The closest I could get to finding someone is Otto Hutschenreuter, a German cellist not known for writing any works, therefore he is an unlikely candidate 
Perhaps I am being dumb, but I am really curious on who Huyschenruyter is RandomEditorAAA (talk) 02:14, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is most likely that Huyschenruyter is a typo of Hutschenruyter, to which it could refer to the previously mentioned Otto, or Wouter (most likely the junior as the senior died before Zweer's 2nd symphony), or Wilhelm. What seems interesting is that Wouter Hutschenruyter Sr. wrote a concert overture for the 25 anniversary of Toonkust (called Feest Overture/Festive Overture), however that would approximately date it to 1854, compared to when Zweers wrote the 2nd symphony in 1882-83. However, I don't think that matters, just interesting. (Sources: "of the twentyfifth anniversary of Toonkunst , for which Hutschenruyter composed a Feest - ouverture [ Festive overture ) . ) Thanks, - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 01:47, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Huyschenruyter
Talk:Oscar Kambona

message: This article has been vandalised and subjected to unwarranted deletions of major portions of it. As the creator of the article, I want it protected permanently. Otherwise I'm going to have it deleted instead of having it abused and distorted by unscrupulous individuals who want to promote their own political agenda.
Dave (talk) 03:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Christopher Gunning

message: Why are anonymous sources deemed acceptable? Shouldn't we wait for more reliable ones?
https://www.topinfoguide.com/wiki/christopher-gunning-obituary-death-english-composer-of-tv-and-film-music-dies-unexpectedly,https://filmmusicreporter.com/2023/03/25/christopher-gunning-1944-2023/
https://filmmusicjournal.ch/christopher-gunning/ Kirill C1 (talk) 14:16, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  anonymous sources
Talk:Chromatic circle

message: This article is in reality two articles, one regarding the Chromatic circle and the other being Pitch constellation. I believe that the concept of the "pitch constellation" is something more general than the 12-TET chromatic scale, or is it not? kupirijo (talk) 06:34, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split off [[Pitch constellation]] article from [[Chromatic circle]] article
Talk:Clocker (composition)

message: 22:47, 25 February 2014‎ Jackintosh11 (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (725 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Jackintosh11 moved page Talk:Clocker to Talk:Clocker (music)) (undo | thank)
:Presumably that was intended to put the train as the main subject? which by page views alone it probably has a case. But with five subjects best as dab. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Clocker (train)]]
Talk:Combinatoriality

message: Anything about it? Hyacinth (talk) 02:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonhexachordal combinatoriality

message: Definitely needs some cleaning up, I might have a go at it if I get a chance. For now, though, I've changed a couple of spelling mistakes and fixed the dead link to "Total Chromaticism" - "aggregate" now redirects to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serialism#Theory_of_serial_music 155.245.109.240 (talk) 13:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: How and why do the references need to be improved? Hyacinth (talk) 03:38, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I feel a vague memory that this was already discussed at length and rejected on the twelve-tone technique talk page or somewhere. Hyacinth (talk) 12:59, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Colored outfit analogy

message: Hi everyone, 
There is a problem with the example taken from the Carter Piano Concerto. First of all, there's a rather glaring typo (Fb instead of F). I have confirmed with the score that it's meant to be an F, and with the erroneous Fb the chord does not even form an aggregate (E is doubled enharmonically and F is missing). But even with this resolved, it only presents an example of retrograde combinatoriality. Elsewhere in the section it is pointed out that this retrograde combinatoriality is trivial, but this example is not clearly labeled as such. I think it would be best to take it down completely since its relevance is questionable, but I thought I'd post here first to see if anyone has the editing chops to fix it. 
--GustavMahler74 (talk) 14:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hexachordal Combinatoriality
Talk:David Laganella

message: I have added the deletion tag to this page because this person is not notable. Most of the extended links are dead. One of the sources links to a university home page. The page is a stub with nothing noteworthy in it. Lastly, there are only a few videos of his work on YouTube with not many views. --Eezurr (talk) 21:07, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Eric Knechtges

message: Does the award mentioned qualify this article for notability?  Does he satisfy any of the criteria on Notability? -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 15:20, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 

message: A tag has been placed on :Eric Knechtges requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable. 
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the .  Eezurr (talk) 17:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Eric Knechtges]]
Talk:Eugene Bowen

message: There can just be a redirect from Eugene Bowen to Gene Bowen, or vice versa.  I plan to implement the redirect if there are no objections soon.  Let me know. Paul Haymon (talk) 22:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirect complete. Paul Haymon (talk) 05:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No need for two articles...
Talk:Florence Price

message: At this writing this seems not to have a page of its own. It is mentioned in Ethel Leginska and Thelma Terry.  The latter indicates it did not pay a living wage, even to the "first chair" (concertmaster). Macmarl (talk) 03:56, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chicago Women's Symphony 

message: Why didn't her family remove the manuscripts before the house went into disarray and was sold 2603:6080:C801:B061:E168:6E49:F31B:C2B3 (talk) 17:41, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manuscripts found out her house 

message: Possible addition: Her Symphony No 1 in E minor was voted number 282 in the  2023 Classic FM Hall of Fame  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CDearlove (talk • contribs) 11:02, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy and honors 

message: Stumbled on this article and was surprised to find that there was no section dealing with Price's reception, unlike similar sections in the articles for Gustav Mahler, Igor Stravinsky, and Dmitri Shostakovich. From what I've read, it is an important and ongoing story, with some interesting dissenting criticisms amidst her mostly positive latter-day reception. I'd add such a section myself here and to articles for her symphonies, but I don't know her music well. Which is why I'm simply suggesting it for consideration to editors that focus on Price and her music. —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 23:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism or reception section?
Talk:Frédéric Devreese

message: capitalisation needs adjusting Dixonsej (talk) 15:33, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gene Bowen

message: There can just be a redirect from Eugene Bowen to Gene Bowen, or vice versa.  I plan to implement the redirect if there are no objections soon.  Let me know. Paul Haymon (talk) 22:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirect complete. Paul Haymon (talk) 05:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No need for two articles...
Talk:Gerhard Stäbler

message: Would it be best to just remove the whole 'Works' section for now?  It is very messy and doesn't seem to necessary. Churchgoer251 (talk) 02:35, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://gerhard-staebler.de/pages/en/biography/short-biography.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Voceditenore (talk) 18:22, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Gregory Short

message: Perhaps you have usage statistics you could share. 
JRCBaker (talk) 18:45, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

message: * I have made minor corrections in the original article without using the minor flag. From this point forward, I will flag any more changes. 
* I will keep up to date with future minor changes in the sandbox draft.
 
JRCBaker (talk) 19:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Using the minor flag

message: JRCBaker (talk) The photo of Greg is removed. I think I set the rights to this image correctly, so why is it being deleted?! TIA 09:41, 2 MAY 2009 (UTC)5/24/2009 
JRCBaker (talk) 23:31, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Although there is no requirement for a reliable reference to be available online ("It is convenient, but by no means necessary, for the archived copy to be accessible via the Internet"), in a case like this one, where Short's notability has been called into question, I suggest that it would be good to use some online sources in order to enable editors to ensure the material meets the verifiability requirement. It's a rare notable person indeed, who is not discussed in any sources available on the Internet. TJRC (talk) 19:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  No online references?
Talk:Howard Cable

message: According to the Canadian Encyclopedia, Howard Cable "arranged three suites based on Canadian folk songs - 'Sing, Sea to Sea!' (GVT, 1984), 'Noel Canadien' (GVT, 1984), and 'Pastiche Quebecois' (GVT, 1979) ."  Where do these fit in the list of compositions? —Torontonian1 (talk) 09:57, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of compositions 
Talk:Indeterminacy (music)

message: There is no definition of indeterminacy.  I'm not qualified to give one, but perhaps someone who is would edit this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.73.239.228 (talk) 14:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm working on it. I've let this article slide for far too long. The Childs article ought to do the trick, but I'll have to go find it in the library.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 21:20, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not qualified either, but I tried to at least provide an imperfect one, 7 years later :) No such user (talk) 19:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops. I kind of fell down on the job, didn't I? Thanks for making the improvements I promised but didn't deliver!—Jerome Kohl (talk) 23:15, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: There is a song by Guns and Rose, I think its Sweet Child Of Mine, where Slash was playing something on the guitar and Axle came running in and said he liked it and wanted it in a song he was writing. Slash was basicall playing scales or just playing a guitar exercise that was not intended to be music. Also, at the end of Sweet Child Of Mine, the line "Where do we go now" was basically something someone in the band said, I believe it was after a recording session but I may be wron on that part. Would this count as musical indeterminacy?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.109.254.214 (talk) 06:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Sweet Child of Mine"
Talk:Interval vector

message: Unless I misunderstood something, the top figure in both examples in the first image file should be 8 and not 4.Signed: Basemetal (write to me here) 06:51, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Same question answered on Talk:Set theory (music).—Jerome Kohl (talk) 07:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  First image in article 

message: Just when I thought I'd got something down. Why are you now notating (2nd image, C major chord example) the interval between pitch class C and pitch class G with 7 and not 5? Signed: Basemetal (write to me here) 08:12, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: See: inversion (music). The formula for the inverse of X is easy, it's 12-X. 12-7 = 5 = 7 = 12-5. Hyacinth (talk) 00:45, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second image in article 

message: As soon as I can figure out how to work the WP math markup, I'll write out the  formulas.  They're mostly basic pre-college math (simple 2 + 2 as far as vectors are concerned).  The irony lies only in that music theorists don't usually realize these things were first and foremost math before they ever were music theory.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.242.14.23 (talk) 20:12, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you will find that the music theorists who actually formulated these ideas (Babbitt, Forte, Martino, Lewin) were acutely aware of their source in mathematics. Perhaps it is true that some later theorists who have adopted the concepts are not so aware. However, as David Lewin has gone to some pains to point out, the long-established conventions of music theory are sometimes at odds with those of mathematics, and therefore demand formatting that may lead the mathematician to conclude that the music theorist is ill-informed. In other cases, it may be that the theorist is in fact ill-informed, or chooses to modify or limit the mathematical concept to suit his own purposes, without explicitly stating that this is the case. In any event, it is always best to explain the differences for the benefit of both the mathematician (who may stumble on an article like this and wonder why the maths aren't kosher) and the mathematically innocent musician (who may not know the difference). I wish I could help you with the math markup, but that is an area I have not gotten much into. I look forward to your eventual explanations.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 22:29, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calculus context 

message: I think the distinction between the triangular number Tn and the transpositional set class Tn is far too subtle - it left me quite confused until I realized that they were referring to different things. BridgeTheMasterBuilder (talk) 03:05, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: T<sub>''n''</sub> vs ''T<sub>n</sub>''
Talk:Jacques Calonne

message: What in this article requires additional citations? There are an average of two citations per paragraph, and the paragraphs are rather short.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 00:36, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations?
Talk:James Clarke (composer)

message: :[added heading for section] So that one can see where the material comes from [in the article created by A.V.Collins (talk), in Nov. 2007], I've added quotation marks, source citations, and pertinent templates.  This article needed and may still need more varied sources so as not to violate Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and WP:CITE relating especially to WP:BLP.  It may still need further clean up with attention to WP:LOP. [as updated.] --NYScholar (talk) 03:38, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of citations, unclear sources, potential copyright violations
Talk:James Yannatos

message: When was he born? Badagnani (talk) 08:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth year
Talk:Jeffrey Ching

message: Why is he included in the category British Composers?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sweetie candykim (talk • contribs) 13:02, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he now British? 

message: This page has been listed at WP:CP because of the substantial similarity of the content to the webpage of the composer. Since the contributor, , wasn't notified, I'd normally relist it for another week. However, unless I've missed something, I don't think it's necessary here: the copyvio claim can't be substantiated on the evidence we have. My thoughts:
* the content was created in 2007
* the page history shows the normal evolution of an article, with progressive small changes to the text
* Ching's present website, jching.com, was not registered until 2011
* his previous website has only been archived once, in 2013, and didn't have this content
* while the content may originally have come from a concert programme or something similar, it appears to have been developed here and then used on the website.
I've removed the copyvio template.
That leaves the question of what to do about the article, which appears to the work of a dedicated WP:SPA who's also written about Ching's compositions and Ching's wife, and nothing else, raising a strong possibility of conflict of interest; I might invite comment on the whole picture at WP:COIN – , , any thoughts? Meanwhile, I suggest that the previous unsourced text should not be restored to the page without references – obviously the WP:BLP violations must not be. He seems to be notable: he's not in Grove, but this article in the Neue Zeitschrift für Musik is about him, and it looks as there may be other coverage. I've made what I hope is a reasonable – but very small – start on an encyclopaedia article. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:18, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright infringement
Talk:Jennifer Walshe

message: Thanks to Katharineamy for adding a whole lot of internal links to this article.  I've just added a few more, but the article is still problematic, not least because of the lack of references.  It reads very much like a CV, and indeed the text is so similar to that on the composer's own website that I'm surprised the copyright bot hasn't been by this way.  Rather than listing every ensemble and festival she's ever worked with, it would be better if the article just mentioned a few, but said something interesting about the collaborations — but then who would be bold enough to decide which to remove?  Maybe the article needs a complete rewrite, based on some reliable third-party references.  --Deskford (talk) 21:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links and references 