Talk:Esterházy

message: Hello 138.251.234.149,
Before taking this dispute further, I'd like to get clarification on the purpose of your edits.  Is it your judgment that noble titles were not abolished in Hungary in 1945?  If so, please cite a legitimate scholarly source for this, and I will leave your edit untouched.  However, if you are simply expressing your own personal objection to the abolition of noble titles (perhaps you are an unhappy Esterhazy descendent?), then I will have to call in help from other editors to get this situation under control.  We are an encyclopedia, and our job is to present the facts, irrespective of what we think about them.
Sincerely,
<BR>
Opus33 18:45, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Query concerning abolition of noble titles

message: I wasn't sure if this was worth mentioning in the article and if so how to work it in. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:21, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Liszt

message: Hello,
This concerns the controversy/edit war seen on this Talk page above, concerning whether the Hungarian government ever passed a law abolishing noble titles.  During this edit war, I was frustrated by the fact that I couldn't find any reference source on this point.  User:Aetil has succeeded in finding a reference to the actual Hungarian law, and I have added a link to this reference (along with a correction of the date, to 1947).  I realize that this reference is in Hungarian, and will be unintelligible to many readers (myself included).  However, since the point at hand led to controversy, I think it would be much better to have a Hungarian-language reference than no reference at all; and the text of the law itself is after all a pretty good thing to have, even if only some readers can understand it.  For reassurance that the Hungarian page really is what I'm saying it is, please see Aetil's entry on my own talk page, User talk:Opus33.  Thanks for listening, Opus33 15:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding a link in Hungarian

message: I just wondered if someone thought renaming the article's web address to something simpler (eliminating the signs and numbers in the name) would be worth it? I don't know, but I thought I'd suggest it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonjames1986 (talk • contribs) 02:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I guess you're referring to the accent mark?  If so:  the way around this is to add redirect pages, which I have just done.  Now, when the reader looks for House of Esterhazy, House of Eszterhazy, or House of Eszterházy, (s)he will be taken directly to the correct article.  Thanks for spotting this, and I hope my change addresses your concern.  Opus33 (talk) 17:27, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?

message: There is another page of Esterhazy. I am going to start a deletion process there. Fakirbakir (talk) 10:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I simply redirected that page here. Fakirbakir (talk) 11:41, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  duplicated article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on House of Esterházy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060504200617/http://www.csvmtkf.hu:80/html/kaposvar1.html to http://www.csvmtkf.hu/html/kaposvar1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot II<assmall>Talk to my owner:Online</small> 00:40, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: To add to this article: the etymology of the name "Esterházy." 173.88.246.138 (talk) 21:03, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article