lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of conflicts in Africa

message: Geez is this list depressing. Brutannica (talk) 15:45, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep ... and I’ve got another hundred or so to add ... --Wally Tharg (talk) 18:43, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the described civil war cannot be categorised as civil war. Such as Nigeria's End SARS saga. 2A00:23C5:D536:BE01:D990:65D8:C347:DEC8 (talk) 10:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Depressing!

message: Many battles have been deleted in the last few months by IP editors without any satisfactory justification. Why? Surely the list should strive for completeness, not simply to be an arbitrary selection by the last editor who fancied a hack at it. --Wally Tharg (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Why have so many entries been deleted?

message: Material from this page has been copied for use on the page 2010s political history.Michael E Nolan (talk) 18:26, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Material copied to other Wikipedia page
Talk:Warlock: The Armageddon

message: How is it "unconnected" and a "sequel" both? thanks - Her Pegship 23:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Status as a sequel

message: I see no reason to include the Druids as being unrelated. I know they aren't. But who cares? Its a movie.—Preceding unsigned comment added by TheEpicLevelHandbook (talk • contribs) 
:Yeah, it's a bit silly especially for such an obvious fantasy movie.--Sus scrofa 12:10, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From what I remember of the movie, I don't even think it's correct.  I recall the distinction between druids and christians being a central plot point in the film, and I'm pretty sure it never said that the druids worshiped "God".  203.94.171.34 (talk) 03:49, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Druids

message: Redlinks are not death. They encourage new articles. For instance, an article on Peter Abrams might be created through a bit of work. .  Let's encourage new artilces. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:30, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving this article...
Talk:Anglo-Aro War

message: Aren't these simply a list, repeated elsewhere and here, with no articles in them? Bokoharamwatch (talk) 11:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battles
Talk:Repeat winners of horse races

message: The following red links have been excluded from this article and are placed here for reference. Zafonic (talk) 20:52, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links

message: Adam Scott Memorial Cup
AJC Randwick Plate
All Comers
Edward Hanmer Chase
Frank Ward & Co Solicitors Chase
Grand Circuit Européen
Grand Critérium de Vitesse
Grand Steeple-Chase de Dieppe
Grasmick Handicap
Hakodate Kinen
Hanshin Jump Stakes
Hawke's Bay Steeplechase
Herefordshire Light Horse Breeding Society's Hunter Chase
Homeby Steeplechase
Horse and Hound Cup
Irish Cesarewitch
Islington Plate
JBC Classic
Kinko Sho
La Touche Cup
Ladbroke Trophy
Lancaster Gold Cup
Lion City Cup
Meadowland Handicap
Mile Championship Nambu Hai
Moe Cup
Naruo Kinen
New Mexico Cup Fillies and Mares
Newcastle Gold Cup
November Cross Country Chase
Ocean Stakes
Peacehaven Selling Handicap Hurdle
Pimlico Cup
Preston Gold Cup
Prix de Belgique
Prix du Bourbonnais
Prix de Bourgogne
Prix d'Europe
Prix de France
Race Around Yorkshire Handicap
Richmond Gold Cup
Royal Artillery Gold Cup
Scottish Champion Hunter Chase
Steeple-Chase des Flandres
Täby Vårsprint
Tony Richards Toyota Hurdle
Topkapi Trophy
United House Construction Chase
United Hunts' Chase
Von Doussa Steeplechase
WANGJC Jackson Stakes
Yalumba Classic Hurdle
— Preceding unsigned comment added by The judge and jury (talk • contribs) 
----
Should Risk of Thunder's 1994 Frank Ward & Co Solicitors Cross Country Chase win be included as it was over 5 furlongs longer (i.e is it the same race?)--Davebesag 23:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Races
Talk:Artel

message: *Oppose - completely different subjects, like, "club" and Club América. - Altenmann >t 19:50, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There are lots of articles that include discussion of notable examples. In fact, an update with the modern uses of Artel for artistic enterprises might also be beneficial. Having disparate unsourced stubs on bits and pieces of what an Artel is and means and how they have manifested doesn't seem useful. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion
Talk:Aro-Ibibio Wars

message: The entire article is unreliable as it lacks any credible references. The only "references" cited lead back to websites appearing to promote the interests of Arochukwu people. This should not be acceptable for WikiProject Nigeria, and certainly, it is not scholarly. At least two independent accounts from credible historians are required for this historical narrative. If this is not available, then I suggest to delete article completely rather than misinform the public. Merlin1935 (talk) 07:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: @Merlin: Your observation is accurate. The only literary source is that of Percy Amaury Talbot (Life in Southern Nigeria - 1923) which is an anthropological observational report based on his posting as British Colonial officer in South East Nigeria and not reference on historical records. I am not questioning the source material as it relates to anthropology, myths and culture, but simply noting that most of the references made in the wiki article are not at all referenced in the Talbot's book, the article appears to be wholly made up from conjecture and fantasy. It is not possible that the article author ever read this book. I have! The article in its current form misinforms the reader and have no historical or documented reference base whatsoever. The remaining two references (both same source) are dead links, and as noted in Merlin's note above, have no historical reference either (reviewing internet archive records). 152.37.100.122 (talk) 17:06, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Needs Independent Sources 

message: Merlin1935,
Independent sources have been added. The article was not misinforming the public. Independent sources on the Aro-Ibibio Wars (until very recently) were extremely hard to find.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LIL T (talk • contribs) 06:56, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: Article Needs Independent Sources 
Talk:Char Bouba war

message: Please see this Char Bouba and Unesco Unesco and how it relates to this topic. Those two tiny sources are not very reliable looking. I do not see the name Nasir ad Din anywhere in this text, despite it being associated with him. --41.177.4.26 (talk) 17:41, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I think there's a general confusion in the article between the Char Bouba war and the Mauritanian 30 Years War. The latter was a general expansion and consolidation of Arab power in Mauritanian, which culminated in the Char Bouba war (1673-1674). Those sources you provided are really good, particularly the Ogot text. There's a good description of the war in the Cambridge History of Africa too. I'm currently working on a rework of the article, hopefully should be able to get some maps in too. MrPenguin20 (talk) 09:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  R.S. Sources + Nasir ad Din
Talk:North (disambiguation)

message: I really think that this dab page contains far more items that it should; however, I am certain that a major revision will meet with some opposition.  Therefore, I'd like to discuss ideas for improving it in order to avoid unnecessary editing activity and confrontation.
* Many of the items on the page are there because the titles contain 'North' rather than 'North' being a potentially alternative title for the article.  For instance, 'North Carolina', 'North America', 'Palmerston North'.  I'd like to remove most if not all of these items and instead include an intstance of Template:PrefixAllPages, which provides a lookup link to the Allpages utility; the template usage would appear as    I prefer to use this template quite sparingly, but in the case of this page, I think it makes sense.
--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Heavily overloaded dab page
Talk:Data classification (data management)

message: This article was changed by User:Usha kharel from a redirect to Classified information, which is what most uses of the term "data classification" refer to.  I'm unfamiliar with the context of this article (something about creating maps) but once that is clarified it should be renamed (perhaps Data classification method or Data classification (mapping), then data classification can be a disambig. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-05 23:55Z
The article is talking about classification of maps. this is not smart, as data classification can be used for non-spatial data as well.
actually, i would even say that its not correct to link this with maps, because the data classification algorithms just classify an attribute of some features. the features than have spatial information which makes the map. i would like to change it, but no time! please.. some statistics guy.. come and fix it ;-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.143.114.146 (talk) 16:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

message: The grade for this article should be updated to "start". The article contains some information, but it is still developing. It contains some relevant information, however it is not arranged in a concise and direct manner. The layout is uneven, with the quality of the prose distinctly unencyclopaedic. Minimal sources are provided, but the sources do verify the content provided. Not in danger of being speedily deleted. Does not reach all C-Class criteria. S4436159 (talk) 07:58, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment of article 

message: — Assignment last updated by MrLavoie (talk) 00:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Cybersecurity Policy
Talk:Russian battleship Tsesarevich

message: Another pic at http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/ggb2005014807/ this time entering portsmouth harbour.©Geni 18:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

message: What was the status of the ship during the 1921 Kronstadt rebellion if it was hulked (1918) but not scrapped (1924, per article)? Paul Avrich wrote in Kronstadt, 1921, p. 151, "Besides the Petropavlovsk and Sevastopol, moreover, eight other warships lay in the Kronstadt harbot and repair docks, including a battleship and three heavy cruisers as well as fifteen gunboats and twenty tugs. Because no icebreaker was available, however, none of these vessels could be brought into action." Would this be that inaccessible battleship? It isn't mentioned by name in the book. I was curious because this image says it was damaged in the 1921 (post-Civil War) fighting. czar 01:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kronstadt rebellion
Talk:Russian battleship Gangut (1911)

message: I have moved the picture of the stamp to Sverdlov class cruiser because the ship shown is the cruiser rather than the battleship —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ala.foum (talk • contribs) 16:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo moved 

message: The name means in Russian Finnish Hankoniemi (in Swedish Hangö Ud) of which the Russian name Gangut was derived in Cyrillic form. This has not been noticed in the main article. In text also another small error. Should be: Gangut was mainly based 1914 - 1917 to Imperial Russian Baltic Navy´s main base at Revel (Tallinn), but occassionally also at Helsinki Sea Fortress in The Grand Duchy of Finland, then part of the Russian Empire, being part of the world largest chain of sea fortresses. Generally known under the name Sea Fortress Peter the Great. There are photographs taken of her lying sink in shallow water at Kronstadt in 1941 damaged by Stuka Divebombers nearly to a wreck. You can see direct a huge bomb hole before her front gun turrets.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.115.143 (talk) 21:43, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Battleship Gangut name

message: * The return of the captain and the issue of a dinner of tinned meat restored order on the ship - captain commodore Kedrov was aboard, while officer which refused to serve relevant meat was ethnical German - von Fittenhof - so crew demand to remove Germans saboteur from fleet. Mutinity was solved after vice-admiral L.Kerber (head of squadron) visit ship. 22 october 1915 95 ratings were arrestedJo0doe (talk) 09:55, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor addition correction
Talk:K-1 HERO'S/to do

message: *History
**Origins
***Expand upon the origins of HERO's, as alluded to in the opening paragraph.   K-1 Romanex, MMA matches on K-1 cards and co-promotion with PRIDE is all out there to be sourced and referenced.
**Controversy
***With some refereeing controversy already, there is certainly information to put something here.
**Growth
***Maybe a section on the growth of HERO's and, in particular, their signing of Kazushi Sakuraba.
*Rules
**Get some proper structure into this, like the UFC article and, to a lesser extent, the PRIDE article.
*Notable Fighters
**I think it would be sensible to keep this to notable K-1 fighters that have transistioned across and notable MMA fighters, i.e. former champions from other promotions.
I think there is certainly a B-class article to be had here.   Crazyknight 23:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Saline High School (Michigan)

message: Talk:Saline High School
Why isn't there any information on the actual high school.  Sports teams seem insignificant to a national audience
:True. Common problem on school articles. Only students edit them, and we end up with what the students want to put here, minus the unacceptable stuff that has to be taken right back out. Fan-1967 00:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am a student at Saline high Shcool and I just added some onformation about the going on there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.106.136.52 (talk) 03:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student Adds Info
Talk:Russian battleship Sevastopol (1911)

message: She comes Brest twice - first time 4 December - becouse Profintern damage and 14 then both again damagedJo0doe (talk) 09:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Brest
Talk:Petropavlovsk-class battleship

message: Why would both Russian postcard (the one in the infobox) and the Japanese postcard call Poltava a cruiser? Publishers' ignorance? The Pobeda/Peresvet/Oslyabya class could be well called cruisers, but not these things. East of Borschov (talk) 18:56, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Curious
Talk:Boehm system (clarinet)

message: The new material on development is quite nice and very welcome.  I do suggest, though, that some changes are needed.  Formatting of the page needs to be brought into conformity with Wikipedia practice.  Also, this reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article and needs some editing.  There are too many passages in quotation marks (some of which are unattributed); most of these should be paraphrased, to convey similar information in different words.  Where appropriate, footnotes should be used to cite sources for particular pieces of information.  Passages like "the mechanism of the clarinet was not brought to its full potential until the mid-1800s when the Boehm system clarinet was created" are statements of opinion, not universally accepted (e.g. German clarinetists do not regard the Boehm system as the sine qua non of clarinet design, and numerous attempts to improve the Boehm system attest to its not being regarded by everyone as bringing the clarinet to its "full potential") and are out of place in a Wikipedia article.  Finally, the summary section isn't necessary.
Once again, thanks for the new material! -- Rsholmes 00:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Development
Talk:Citrus Red 2

message: The statement "It is permitted by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 1956 only for use on skin on some Florida oranges." is in error in that Citrus Red No. 2 is not limited by the FDA to oranges in Florida. It may be used in any State or Territory subject to the restrictions of that entity.
California and Arizona are the only States that prohibit its use. Florida sets specific standards for its use on oranges, tangelos and tangors.
References:
Anonymous. 1988. Florida Citrus Fruit Laws. Florida Statutes. 601.
Code of Federal Regualtions Title 21 Part 74.302 (21 CFR 74.302).
Hall, David J. 1989. Peel Disorders of Florida Citrus as Related to Grwing Area and Color-add formulations. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 102:243-246.
Hall, David J. and David Sorenson. 2006. Washing, Waxing, and Color-Adding. (Chapter 15 In: Fresh Citrus Fruits, Second Eddition. Wilfred F. Wardowski, William M. Miller, David J. Hall and William Grierson, Eds.) Florida Science Source. Longboat Key, Florida.
--Fruitwax (talk) 20:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reworded that statement and added in your references.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error of fact. 

message: In the article the statement is made that Citrus Red 2 is a carcinogen. According to the IARC (I) International Agency for Research on Cancer (World Health Organization) it is placed in Class2B. Class 2B is defined as a POSSIBLE carcinogen. Class 2A is defined as a PROBABLE carcinogen while Class 1 is for compounds that ARE carcinogens.(1)
(1) Carson, Phillip and Clive Mumford. 2002. Risk Assessment of Carcinogens. In Hazardous Chemicals Handbook, Second Edition. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK. p. 119-177.
fruitwax: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fruitwax (talk • contribs) 18:07, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Carcinogenicity
Talk:Kaiser Shipyards

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:GNU Simpler Free Documentation License

message: I read the article, and it says that the GFDL allows cross licensing with the GSFDL if no GSFDL-incompatible features are used. I am sure they mean that the GFDL is compatible with the GSFDL if no GSFDL-incompatible features are used. Emanla Eraton 18:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross licensing? 

message: It concerns a proposal, and one that's more than a decade old. Hardly seems noteworthy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.147.155.219 (talk) 08:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this article exist?
Template talk:School block

message: JJMC89, your  recent edit to this template modified how the comments field was displayed.  As a consequence of your edit any links in the comment field are now displayed as plain links.  Previously this was not the case.  Was this change to the behavior of the comments field deliberate on your part? —RP88 (talk) 11:28, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't the goal, but I don't see why it shouldn't be that way. Are there any cases where ELs to non-WMF sites get used in the comments? — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:55, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't think it happens very often.  I recall a couple of cases where the comments field would either link to a page hosted by the school that the student could use to contact their IT department for assistance with creating an account or to a page documenting their school-specific wikipedia policy. —RP88 (talk) 03:44, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Reverted. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:46, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plain links for links in comments 

message: ... tags are not set up properly. One of the  tags is missing its end tag and one of the  tags is stripped. Anomalocaris (talk) 10:04, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: please update [[Template:School block/sandbox] with the change you propose. — xaosflux Talk 20:35, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Xaoxflux: I thought had identified an error, but I can't reproduce it now. I'll reactivate this request if I can demonstrate the alleged error again. —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 14 February 2018 

message: Please undo per WP:BRD this edit  that removed the reasonalt parameter from this template. --Bsherr (talk) 17:09, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: . Primefac (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

text: Can you now share the reason you wished for the change to be reverted? --Deskana (talk) 21:51, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think I know. I meant to remove the redundant and unnecessary parenthetical text, but I made a mistake and also unintendedly removed the reasonalt parameter. I've fixed that mistake now. --Deskana (talk) 22:31, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That's it precisely. Thanks for your patience. Regrettably, this parameter is not documented. I will endeavor to fix that. Bsherr (talk) 22:37, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries. Glad it worked out! --Deskana (talk) 14:15, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restore reasonalt parameter 

message: TheProGamer1000 (talk) 04:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This appears to be an empty edit request (I have commented out the copy/paste of the entire template code, which was not helpful). Did you wish to make a request to change the text in this template? – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 9 January 2023
Talk:Thousand Sunny

message: Iceburg: "If you're gonna be the Pirate King one day,"
	"You need a ship based on the King of the Beasts!!!"
from stephen translation, chapter 436.
Next Time wait to have some reliable information! Cuttyflam 11:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This page should have been made a subsection of the Going Merry article until an actual name of the ship was known. Luckily, all we have to do to fix it when the ship does get a name is move it and edit the article, which is simple enough. What bugs me about this is that there seems to be a growing trend of fans who can't wait long enough to confirm new info before copying and pasting it to Wikipedia. It's the same with spoilers for new chapters (which often don't even show up at newsstands in Japan until the following week): the second they see something in the spoiler that sounds good, they have to post it here without bothering to actually wait for the chapter to come out and see if it's remotely accurate. I realize that this irresponsible "credulous, overeager fanboy" behavior is easy enough to fix, but it really annoys me that it even happens in the first place. --Julian Grybowski 02:11, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Haven't we learned already by now? Don't believe in spoilers till they're proven. - Tekoteko 18:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ship's Name it's not King of Beasts

message: I live in america (reasd the english) but in the japenese version if you come across the TS's blue prints in between chapters (the same way oda put in the going merrys) it would be a good idea to put them up here. I cant because like I said I only know how to read english(and 1st grade spanish). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ctstrawhat910 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  blue prints
Talk:George R. Harker

message: Keep The tag on this article says that writing for these journals may not be enough to establish notability. However, the person placing the tag seems to have ignored the books published by Harker, and having published three books usually is considered enough. Furthermore, as Dr. Leisure, Harker is a very well known speaker and activist in the naturist movement, and there aren't many people who can say that. At the time this article was first nominated for deletion and voted to KEEP, it had less material than it does now. I will try to add more to it, but five days over the Thanksgiving weekend doesn't give me time. I'd ask for it to be kept. Rosencomet (talk) 16:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Please explain the need for this tag. Who are you referring to? If it's me, this person appeared at an event I help organize, from which I get no monetary compensation, in 1996. That's over 16 years ago. Not too much COI in that.Rosencomet (talk) 15:01, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: COI Tag