lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Katie Armiger

message: This is definitely a worthy article of Wikipedia.  She is a big buzz where I live locally, in Houston, and is getting lots of play time on the radio all over the country.  Please stop deleting this page, she is an important singer who will more than likely soon hit it big.
I feel it's a little different than the average "up-and-comer" because of her full record-company support, critical acclaim, etc.  Please let me know what I can do to save the article - or is it simply a matter of the subject?
:Provide verifiable references to reliable sources to demonstrate that she meets the notability guidelines for musicians.  Also note that you are free to make your case on the AfD discussion page.
:Forgive us more experienced editors if we're a little jaded about seeing terms like "aspiring" and "up and coming" in articles--words like that scream "not notable yet", which in turn means "not notable".  --Finngall talk 21:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Absorption (pharmacology)

message: I am looking for the basic science regarding the absorption rate of liquids vs. pills.  I know that liquids absorb into the system better, but I want the definitive source to back this up.  Thanks SusanSusan2scott 19:46, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

message: How about blood flow? Food in stomach? Drug formulation? Gut motility? First pass metabolism?? the last one is perhaps the most crucial to include on basic pharmocology 129.180.166.53 (talk) 07:05, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing factors
Template talk:Infobox Biography

message: This template is no longer in use (see Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Infobox Biography) so can some please remove the redirect and changed to say it is depreciated (per Template_talk:Infobox_Person#Conclusion). :: maelgwn - talk 09:01, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I unprotected the page. However, I left the redirect intact; you're free to change it. Cheers. --MZMcBride 17:33, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depreciated
Talk:Chuck Munson/Archive 2

message: Please remember that this is the talk page for this particular article.  It is not a place to rehash grievances regarding behavior in other articles or offsite.  If there is or has been a problem with another article, please discuss that article on the talk page for that particular article.  If there is or has been a problem with a user's behavior elsewhere on Wikipedia, there are other forums for you to address your grievances, and I will assist you with that if necessary.  This page is not that forum.  Thank you. Gamaliel 18:47, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A note to all participants 

message: What about Munson's call to "boycott" Wikipedia? He's erased it from his blog, but there's some discussion of it in a previous round of Munson-related Wikiwars... also related to a separate instance of Munson editing the entry on him. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Deletion_sorting/Politics_and_law/Closed#Chuck_Munson
In the Stacks
::That may be of interest to editors, but we don't use Wikipedia as a source. We wouldn't include that kind of info in an article. -Will Beback 02:09, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  related discussion of Munson editing entry on himself
Talk:Greater Mauritania

message: The concept of Mauritanian irredentism strikes me as a contradiction in terms.  The name "Mauritania" is ancient, but the modern state was born half a century ago with no history.  As the French divided up their holdings into independent countries, there was a left over spot on the map.  Senegal and Mali didn't want it, and the French wanted to keep Algeria and Morocco from taking it over, so they made a country.  
Am I misinformed?  Is there some Mauritanian identity which predates the decolonization?  — Randall Bart (talk) 19:58, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article for real?
Talk:Brennilis Nuclear Power Plant

message: I hear accounts from a Dutch nuclear physicist that decommissioning of Brennilis is behind schedule, into significant cost overruns, with several fundamental questions about how to go on and make it a green process, unanswered. Basically they are stuck in the mud, while EDF apparently needs a payable decommissioning technology, because they calculated that by exporting this technology, they could make up for their lack of savings for a dozen upcoming reactor decommissionings. 
If true, this would have major consequences for French nuclear industry, because conclusion might be, that decommissioning is far more expensive than now assumed. Hence, saving funds, required by new laws to be realistic for future decommissioning, would have to be increased enormously, which would add considerably to the cost of nuclear power, and hence to the appeal it has on investors.
Therefore I would argue to upgrade Brennelis in Wiki-importance. I will try to find documents on this issue, and add them. I hope others with more knowledge and contacts in this industry would do the same.Pieter Felix Smit (talk) 06:02, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

message: Since HWGCR designs are so rare (other one is KS 150) - What were the pro and cons of using HW for moderator with gas for cooling ? - Rod57 (talk) 00:19, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could do with more on the motivation and design
Talk:Untitled album by Zoviet France

message: CorenSearchBot noted a similarity in this article's content and suggested it may be a copyright violation with repect to the Wikipedia entry for Garista. This is not the case. As originator of both articles, I note the similarities but regard them as genuine factual similarities. Alchemagenta 20:03, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CorenSearchBot
Talk:Gordon Myers Amateur Achievement Award

message: :Image:Clintford.jpg has permission to be used by the copyright holder. It is linked to one page for which it does have a non-free use rationale. This image is fine.
-Richard "Doc" Kinne (talk) 00:04, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs to have a fair use rationale for this article before it can be used here. Regards, RJH (talk) 02:20, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image Does Have Rational

message: Just tagged the page with  since there is no information on winners from 2010 or 2011.  This should be remedied as soon as possible since this is a featured list.  The Rambling Man (talk) 15:33, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date
Talk:Claroline

message: The main source for something like this is their own web site, which is totally OK by me. yamaplos 15:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Adding a db-spam tag by an unregistered user is rather inappropriate. The article might be rewritten, but it should be clear that this program warrants an article. If you have clear arguments for deletion, please post them on the talk page or propose alternative actions. LHOON 20:13, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion tag 

message: The article claims that the "thing" is available in 35 languages but there are wery few available in wiki. I suspect overstatment. I suggest adding a db-spam tag.
134.214.60.125 (talk) 19:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims are suspicious 
Talk:Li (Confucianism)

message: In Chinese and Confucian philosophy, there is Li, Li, Li and Li... they're all different characters but someone typing Li in Wikipedia will invariably click on the "Li" meaning ritual (which could look like it's related to the Li of principle (理), but it's nothing like it). Someone could also mix of one the Li and think it's the same term for "force" (力), like in modern science.
It's completely different. Me thinks Wiki needs a way of differentiating Li, Li and Li from Li.
(nb. I'll create the "Li" principle one... if a guy doesn't delete them)
----
li as 理 is used by Wang Hui (Tsinghua uni) and is commonly used , I think, for the concept of 'ritual as principle' in analyses of Confucian philosophy. The other three forms of 'li' can also be described of course, but then every Chinese character (55k+) could be described in wiki....
The bigger problem is that the text only refers to Western interpretations of li (理), maybe some Chinese scholars could eloborate? Another problem is the limited amount of depth given to the concept of li (理).
M. UK  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.101.243 (talk) 18:41, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would "way of doing things" be appropriate? Or have I got it wrong? 118.90.45.84 (talk) 10:09, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blunt translation 

message: My rationale is that as both articles are short, Li (Neo-Confucianism) should just become a new section on this page. UpdateNerd (talk) 10:02, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Couzinet 70

message: These two types look alike (trimotors with the characteristic Couzinet fin) only if scale is ignored. The 70 had a 30 m span, the 100, 13.50 m. Should we not separate them?TSRL (talk) 21:58, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Couzinet 70 and Couzinet 100
Talk:Koorawatha

message: (Moved from article) "Re Petra Kelly: personal communication, plus confirmation from Young Shire Council".
:Unfortunately we can't use this as a valid source for this claim.  Wikipedia requires that all content should be attributable to reliable, published sources.  While I have no doubt that it is correct, your claim falls into the category of original research unless the claim has been published in another reliable, independent source. There may have been something about her in the local paper or newsletter that you may be able to use as a source. Cheers, Mattinbgn/ talk 11:26, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Petra Kelly

message: Something has clearly gone astray with the map. I'm afraid I don't have the ability to fix it. 110.147.185.128 (talk) 22:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map
Talk:Pope Athanasius II of Alexandria

message: There seems to be a conflation of information about two different Athanasius's in this article! Pgg7 18:58, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The confusing information has been placed in a separate section, so it can only be seen when editing the article. John Carter 20:31, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jumbled information?
Talk:Eishō (Heian period)

message: Eishō may refer to:
*Eishō (Heian period) (永承), Japanese era from 1046 to 1053
*Eishō (Muromachi period) (永正), Japanese era from 1504 to 1521
This set of nengō used to be identified as
*Eishō (first) (永承), Japanese era from 1046 to 1053
*Eishō (永正), Japanese era from 1504 to 1521
It was suggested that the period designations were clearer; and the same pattern seemed useful in the cases of other homonym pairs in the list of Japanese era names:
    * 976_ 貞元 |Jōgen (976 - 978)
    * 1046 永承 |Eishō (1046 - 1053) ---> [Eishō (Heian period)]
    * 1099 康和 |Kōwa (1099 - 1104)
    * 1131 天承 |Tenshō (1131 - 1132)
    * 1142 康治 |Kōji (1142 - 1144)
    * 1207 承元 |Jōgen (1207 - 1211) 
    * 1222 貞応 |Jōō (1222 - 1224)
    * 1278 弘安 |Kōan (1278 - 1288)
    * 1312 正和 |Shōwa (1312 - 1317)
    * 1361 康安 |Kōan (1361 - 1362)
    * 1381 弘和 |Kōwa (1381 - 1383) 
    * 1504 永正 |Eishō (1504 - 1521) --> [Eishō (Muromachi period)]
    * 1555 弘治 |Kōji (1555 - 1558)
    * 1573 天正 |Tenshō (1573 - 1592)
    * 1652 承応 |Jōō (1652 - 1655)
    * 1926 昭和 |Shōwa (1926 - 1989)
If you have any further comments, questions, suggestions, etc. ..., please feel free to contribute as you see fit at Talk:Japanese era name. Ooperhoofd 01:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Homonyms
Talk:Nicky Parsons

message: Just as I suspected: plenty of information to create a page for Parsons. ;) Check it out here: Nicky Parsons. I still can't figure out how to post pictures, though... ~Tori
I'm confused, I thought it was decided this character didn't need a page.  Why does she have one?  Especially when Marie doesn't, and she was featured in the books as well.  - Janitor15 (talk) 04:06, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Created
Talk:May Pen

message: what's the reason for that tag? FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 04:31, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  original research? 

message: thanks for the confirmation that the name was indeed derived from a pen (Jamaican cattle farm). The online sources I found are rather inadequate in this respect jis.gov.jm only states that it "was once part of a property owned by Rev. William May" and "it is said to have begun as merely two inns on the bank of the Rio Minho." But since my edit I've found http://aparcelofribbons.co.uk/tag/william-may/ which mentions his pen, right at the end.
I've traced the original statement that  to an edit by User:Journalist (in 2005!). I'd like to confirm, if we can, whether the place was a plantation or a pen in the 17th century, before May's time. It obviously couldn't have been named after him until some time after he arrived on the island in 1719. I've asked Journalist if he can recall where what he wrote came from.
Whatever comes out of this, I think a little rewording may be needed to clarify the point.  —SMALLJIM  13:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins
Talk:Eishō (Muromachi period)

message: Eishō may refer to:
*Eishō (Heian period) (永承), Japanese era from 1046 to 1053
*Eishō (Muromachi period) (永正), Japanese era from 1504 to 1521
This set of nengō used to be identified as
*Eishō (first) (永承), Japanese era from 1046 to 1053
*Eishō (永正), Japanese era from 1504 to 1521
It was suggested that the period designations were clearer; and the same pattern seemed useful in the cases of other homonym pairs in the list of Japanese era names:
    * 976_ 貞元 |Jōgen (976 - 978)
    * 1046 永承 |Eishō (1046 - 1053) ---> [Eishō (Heian period)]
    * 1099 康和 |Kōwa (1099 - 1104)
    * 1131 天承 |Tenshō (1131 - 1132)
    * 1142 康治 |Kōji (1142 - 1144)
    * 1207 承元 |Jōgen (1207 - 1211) 
    * 1222 貞応 |Jōō (1222 - 1224)
    * 1278 弘安 |Kōan (1278 - 1288)
    * 1312 正和 |Shōwa (1312 - 1317)
    * 1361 康安 |Kōan (1361 - 1362)
    * 1381 弘和 |Kōwa (1381 - 1383)  
    * 1504 永正 |Eishō (1504 - 1521) --> [Eishō (Muromachi period)]
    * 1555 弘治 |Kōji (1555 - 1558)
    * 1573 天正 |Tenshō (1573 - 1592)
    * 1652 承応 |Jōō (1652 - 1655)
    * 1926 昭和 |Shōwa (1926 - 1989)
If you have any further comments, questions, suggestions, etc. ..., please feel free to contribute as you see fit at Talk:Japanese era name. Ooperhoofd 01:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Homonyms

message: The following data was posted without verifying source citations.  It has been moved here pending verfication ... but the more interesting question has to do with whether this kind of additional information would be potentially helpful in all the Nengō articles?  Such a project would involve a lot of work for someone -- but it's not something I'm interested in developing.  Presumably, the editor who added these two sections also felt unwilling to invest the level of work needed for full metastasis? 
===Births of the Eishō era===
* Eishō 7 (1510):  Oda Nobuhide, general and father of Oda Nobunaga  [died Tenbun 20 (1551)].
* Eishō 7 (1510):  Matsunaga Hisahide, general  [died Tenshō 5 (1576)].
* Eishō 8 (1511):  Ashikaga Yoshiharu, 12th Shōgun of the Muromachi Bakufu  [died Tenbun 19 (1550)].
* Eishō 14, the 29th day of the 5th month (1517):  Emperor Ōgimachi  [died Bunroku 2 (1593)].
===Deaths of the Eishō era===
* Eishō 8, on the 14th day of the 8th month (September 6, 1511):  Ashikaga Yoshizumi, 11th Shōgun of the Muromachi Bakufu  [born Bummei 12  (1480)].
In brief, the question becomes "Is this a good idea?" --Tenmei (talk) 20:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Arguably useful addition

message: * Eishō 8, on the 14th day of the 8th month (September 6, 1511):  Ashikaga Yoshizumi, 11th Shōgun of the Muromachi Bakufu  [born Bummei 12  (1480)].
In brief, the question becomes "Is this a good idea?" --Tenmei (talk) 20:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deaths of the ''Eishō'' era
Talk:Achatinella apexfulva

message: Please update. Last known species in captivity has died. Source: https://dlnr.hawaii.gov/blog/2019/01/04/nr18-249/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.74.64.235 (talk) 02:34, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated with new info, but waiting on discussion below to determine whether we should call it extinct. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 21:27, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Update request

message: @  @ So multiple reliable news outlets have reported the death of the last captive member of the species. But the IUCN redlist has yet to update its status. Do we update the status box to say extinct, but be clear that the attribution is not IUCN? Or do we have to wait for IUCN to declare it extinct? Should the lead declare it extinct based on news reports? Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 21:25, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: As we can't attribute an "Extinct" status to the IUCN unless they assign it, and we shouldn't leave out an IUCN status from the box if one has been assigned (even if it has been superseded in practice), the usual approach is to explain the state of things in the text. I have inserted an explanation at the end (and a note in the code re the status, although based on experience that'll do exactly zip...). --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extinction?
Talk:List of Naruto characters

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Kabuto Yakushi(Naruto) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 30#Kabuto Yakushi(Naruto) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 00:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kabuto Yakushi(Naruto)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Should add that Momoshiki Otsutsuki has their own main article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.71.60.61 (talk) 07:20, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Momoshiki Otsutsuki 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :List of Boruto characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Boruto characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
 AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:23, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:List of Boruto characters]] for deletion 

message: should we include nanashi as a character? HiGuys69420 (talk) 22:17, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nanashi uchiha? 

message: there are mentions on this page along with a few others i've seen of a third child of naruto and hinata that does not exist 2001:48F8:1015:2DC3:CD89:C30E:1A70:DBD1 (talk) 09:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  haruto uzumaki?
Talk:Achatinella concavospira

message: — Assignment last updated by Btarumot (talk) 02:42, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology

message: — Assignment last updated by Anuinhawaii (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology - Waipahu
Talk:Achatinella fulgens

message: — Assignment last updated by Dr Alyssa MacDonald (talk) 17:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology

message: — Assignment last updated by DivineXena808 (talk) 20:45, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology - A.Faucci

message: 01 Mar 2019 - "growing population of what is now closer to 40 individuals."
https://www.instagram.com/p/BuhA6jdBfd5/
09 Dec 2019  - "This week in the laboratory the 50th A. Fulgens was born!"
https://www.instagram.com/dsischo/p/B52Ca5JjvZS/ -rudyard (talk) 06:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some updates as of May 2024
Talk:Achatinella livida

message: Some public domain photo of Achatinella is available at http://www.army.mil/article/36531/A_dog___039_tail__039__of_two_snails/ as a third photo. It has caption "The endangered Achatinella livida, is commonly known as the Oahu, or kahuli, tree snail." But Achatinella livida is referred as extinct at IUCN Red List prior to 1990. What species could be on that photo? --Snek01 (talk) 23:06, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: — Assignment last updated by Anuinhawaii (talk) 06:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology

message: — Assignment last updated by Anuinhawaii (talk) 19:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology - Waipahu
Talk:Achatinella mustelina

message: — Assignment last updated by Dr Alyssa MacDonald (talk) 17:28, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology

message: — Assignment last updated by Anuinhawaii (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Zoology - A.Faucci
Talk:Otto Julius Klotz

message: In Ben Gadd's book Handbook of the Canadian Rockies, he mentions a railway worker named Otto Klotz as being the person who originally discovered the world famous fossil beds of the Burgess Shale in British Columbia, Canada. It seems likely that this article is about the same Otto Klotz. Does anyone know for sure?
In the 1870s a railway surveyor/engineer named Otto Klotz discovered a sensational horde of fossils in this area, but word didn't reach the scientific community until Charles Walcott, a paleontologist with the Smithsonian Museum in Washington, DC, happened to notice the fossils while on a geological expedition in the area in 1909.Gadd, Ben. 1986. Handbook of the Canadian Rockies, 1st ed. Jasper, Canada: Corax Press. p. 98
--Ae491 (talk) 06:02, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discoverer of the Burgess Shale?
Talk:Swan Lake Nature Study Area

message: Sorry, but this article doesn't pass the quick fail-criteria. It is too short, not very well referenced, and altogether not even close to being ready to becoming a good article yet.  Thanks for the time, and I hope to see this article expanded into a GA in the future. --Meldshal [Chat] 17:46, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a small topic with a correspondingly small article.  What, precisely, would you recommend adding to the article?  As to references, all the content is referenced from reliable sources.  In what respect is it not well-referenced?--ragesoss (talk) 17:50, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I meant generally that 3 references (they all should be reliable, anyway) is not enough for a good article, in some cases, that is not even good enough for a B-class article. I would be glad to help you find some references. Why doesn't anyone ask anymore? I'll find some refs. --Meldshal [Chat] 17:55, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I appreciate that.  I haven't looked into references since I created this article, and there may be some new useful ones out there.  The number of references, per se, however, is not one of the good article criteria.  Small articles need correspondingly less referencing; this has one reference per paragraph, which is typical of Good and even many Featured articles.--ragesoss (talk) 18:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GAN