lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Districts of Northern Ireland

message: :(First 3 quotes are moved from User Talk pages to facilitate wider discussion):
It is not customary to include the date name in categories of present entities as you (User:Laurel Lodged) have done in :Category:Districts of Northern Ireland, 2015-present. I request that you propose this at  Wikipedia:WikiProject Northern Ireland before proceeding any further. jnestorius(talk) 13:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: My intention was that "Districts of Northern Ireland" should be a container for the two periods as the retention of the name "District" can only be a source of confusion. Maling the two explicit in a container makes such confusion less likely IMHO. Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:32, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is enough to have two categories, one for the current and one for the former. Adding a third category adds confusion rather than removing it. jnestorius(talk) 13:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: What about Belfast? It's in both time periods. To include it in a former category would give the impression that it not an ongoing entity. To exclude it from former would give the impression that it was not part of the 2015 reform. The threefold arrangement allows for both periods to be valid for Belfast. Laurel Lodged (talk) 11:51, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

text: By the way, won't :Category:Council elections in Northern Ireland require similar treatment by period? Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:34, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Really the supercat for elections should be :Category:Local authorities of Northern Ireland rather than :Category:Districts of Northern Ireland to allow for pre-1973 (county, county district, and town commissioners) such as Belfast Corporation election, 1920. There could be subcats within that. jnestorius(talk) 13:52, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure
Talk:RijnGouweLijn

message: I have used automatic translation to translate most of the Dutch page into English.
While far fom idiomatic English, I have tried to correct the worst mistakes of the automatic translation
and make sense of the Dutch text. I am Swedish, though, with a very limited knowledge of Dutch.
I hope that my effort will be appreciated, even though it is not nearly finished. Hopefully others, 
native speakers of Dutch and English, and persons with a better knowledge of the project will contrubute to improving the article.
Knubbe Kub 2010-03-28 16.25 CET  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knubbe kub (talk • contribs) 14:25, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Bahiyyih Nakhjavani

message: While she has authored many books and articles related to the religion, and she is the daughter of Ali Nakhjavani there is available for citation apparently no reference to her status as a Baha'i. Any citable source should be made available.--Smkolins (talk) 00:10, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: best I can find is  which states she was born into a Baha'i family....--Smkolins (talk) 00:29, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good detail but not enough to say she is a member of the Bahá'í Faith. Seems obvious - daughter of a very well known Baha'i, writes on Baha'i themes, lectures on the Baha'i Faith.... but no simple statements of being a Baha'i or how being a Baha'i has affected her. She has the right not to but until she does somewhere citable, it's a barrier to citation in Wikipedia as I see things.--Smkolins (talk) 20:45, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  status as a Baha'i 

message: ===On Ali Nakhjavani===
* 
* 
* 
* 
*  (a brother of Ali Nakhjavani, establishes background in Baku etc)
===On Bahiyyih===
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
 
Smkolins (talk) 14:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  collecting sources 

message: * 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
 
Smkolins (talk) 14:10, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: On Bahiyyih
Talk:Boeing 747 hull losses

message: http://avherald.com/h?article=48893f03
Does it count yet? Hcobb (talk) 15:15, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Its not flown since is arrived in Arizona a few weeks ago but the fact it flew back to the states means it wasnt a hull loss. MilborneOne (talk) 15:28, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  N664US 

message: While interesting, I'm not sure this should be on the list as a hull loss.  The aircraft was returned to service according to the linked Wikipedia article. N9XTN (talk) 22:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Airways Flight 9 a hull loss? 

message: Someone wrote that a 747 hull loss incident occurred at Incheon International Airport in the 1990s. This seems to be untrue, because that airport opened in the 2000s and the airport serving Seoul was Gimpo International Airport. The owner of all ✌️ 03:02, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not received a reply here, so I removed the clearly incorrect information regarding a 1998 incident supposedly occurring at Incheon airport. TOA The owner of all ☑️ 16:44, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incident at Seoul airport 

message: Qantas Flight 1 is not a hull-loss event. VH-OJH was returned to service, as the linked  article discusses. Sacxpert (talk) 04:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: QF1
Talk:Frank Gardner (racing driver)

message: Re: The CorenSearchBot has performed a web search with the contents of this page, and it appears to be a substantial copy of the Wikipedia page Frank Gardner.
:I have checked this page and the text is different - I think CorenSearchBot has made an error. Somno (talk) 00:18, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article contains the following unreferenced statements: "Gardner was born in 1931, not 1930 as is often quoted. He changed his date of birth on documents which permitted the under-age Gardner to gain a racing licence."
*The following sources give his year of birth as 1930: oldracingcars.com, (subscription site) FORIX, BNF
*The following sources give his year of birth as 1931: Library of Congress
I'll keep looking for more sources. DH85868993 (talk) 21:29, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth
Talk:Arnela Odžaković

message: without the information on style and federation, the claims about championships are worth less than the screen they appear on. Add this, if you know (with giving some external source). Pundit|utter 00:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: style
Talk:List of tallest buildings in Tulsa, Oklahoma

message: How do church spires work into the tallest building categories? Although there are no church spires over 200 feet that I know of, according to The Tulsa Preservation Commision, Holy Family Cathedral was the tallest building in Tulsa between 1919 and 1925 when the Mayo Hotel was built. Since there weren't any buildings with more than two stories in Tulsa until the 1900s the it should be possible to research what were the tallest buildings prior to 1912. The first three story building was the New State Hotel (image). With a little research I could dig up the later tallest buildings. Dsmdgold (talk) 17:29, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Church Spires?

message: The proposed The Westin at Tulsa Garden Square has not been approved after five years, and there is no indication whether the project will be performed. No other high rise projects are known to be active. Therefore, I believe it is inappropriate to maintain this section on the main page, and have removed it. Bruin2 (talk) 17:48, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted Tallest proposed section
Talk:House of Pac

message: Wasn't the Pac symbol a modified Gozdawa? Sadly, I cannot find the reference but as far as I remember it was available online and written in Polish language. I can't find it anymore, though.
31.16.187.37 (talk) 13:19, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Coat of Arms? 

message: Hello.
The links from Ludwik Michał Pac (1778–1835) and Ludwik Michał Pac (1780–1835) go to the page Ludwik Michał Pac (1778–1835).
Are there two people, or only one ?
Jacques Richard
--92.91.74.18 (talk) 17:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ludwik Michał Pac
Talk:Wiśniowiecki

message: According to Polish Wikipedia "modern research favors the Rurikid version". The cited source (Historical Dictionary of Poland, 966-1945) cites only the Rurikid descend version.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know about the Wiśniowiecki, but the DNA of Woroniecki turned out Rurikid. --95.24.68.167 (talk) 12:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Rurikid or Gediminids
Talk:Toyota A-BAT

message: Just released with very little information. Check the reference tags. More info to come soon. Roguegeek (talk) 00:38, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the subject of the article is notable, and so would oppose deletion. That said, in the future please do not remove the deletion notice on an article you created. Btyner (talk) 16:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hang on
Talk:Challenge International de Tourisme 1929

message: How is it that Morzek came first overall when he was in 30th position at the end of the technical trials compared to Board's 15th and received the same amount of points for the rally?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.70.192.218 (talk) 17:49, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Morzik got 10 points more for the rally - and differences after technical trials were very small. Pibwl ←« 15:03, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Notaspidea

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  -- ascidian | talk-to-me 13:34, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Why Has Bodhi-Dharma Left for the East?

message: I believe 달마가 should be transliterated as "Darmaga" (or "Dharmaga") rather than "Dalmaga"), and 까닭은 should be transliterated as "kkadalk-eun" rather than "kkadakeun" (not leaving out the "l" in the second syllabic block). Badagnani (talk) 00:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hard to say, since it's from a Sanskrit word, and Korean Romanization is pretty changeable anyway... I think I copied it from IMDB, and they're far from authoritative in Korean. Feel free to change as appropriate, Badagnani. Dekkappai (talk) 00:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:Elżbieta Szydłowska

message: Why was the marriage morganatic? Why was she not a queen? Is the article correct? --85.226.44.201 (talk) 21:18, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: The year of marriage on the king's page was 1783/83, so this was change to that from 1789. But what date is correct? --85.226.44.201 (talk) 21:27, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  When
Talk:Micromollusk

message: Hi, I am a relatively new editor on Wikipedia but I have been active on Wikisource for about 4 years so forgive me if I don't entirely get the Wikipedia culture. 
This page (Micromollusk) is marked as needing citations, however, it cites the foremost paper on the subject talking about how to handle and process micromollusks. I am doing research on micromollusks for a class and thought I could lend some citations. I have been combing through the literature for this class already and while there isn't a lot of papers on the subject, this paper "Techniques for collecting, handling, preparing, storing and examining small molluscan specimens" which can be found here https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288605135_Techniques_for_collecting_handling_preparing_storing_and_examining_small_molluscan_specimens, collects all of the techniques tried and whether or not they worked by the top scientists in this field; Daniel L. Geiger, Bruce A. Marshall, Winston F. Ponder, Takenoru Sasaki & Anders Warén. So, I feel that much of this Wikepedia page can actually be referenced to this paper. I added a citation to a claim that was present in Geiger et al 2007 as well as other papers but I am unsure whether or not other people feel like more citations are needed. 
TLDR: Should I add more citations to this paper to substantiate claims that are already covered by sources in the Further Reading section? Seperation (talk) 06:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citing for Micromollusks
Talk:Diverticulum (mollusc anatomy)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 22:14, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Diverticulum (mollusc) →  – current title is reserved for taxons (eg Chaetoderma (mollusc)). Hence – it is misleading. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 March 2021
Talk:Kim Ki-duk (director, born 1934)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support The (director) distinction bothered me from the beginning since they are both directors. Barring a better solution, I suggest "Kim Ki-duk (born 1934)" and "Kim Ki-duk (born 1960)" or some variation on that. Dekkappai (talk) 00:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Mỹ Trạch massacre

message: Contributions is not neutral and this event not well known, one-sided information. Propaganda ?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.217.239.226 (talk) 15:58, 22 May 2009
:A contribution about an event does not have to be neutral. The article itself has to be neutral in regards to how it happened. If only one view is attributed, find others sources that might challenge the view. Not being well known is not an argument; it might be well known in Vietnam. Propaganda is a WP:LABEL. Bataaf van Oranje (talk) 16:25, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment by 94.217.239.226 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 
Talk:Irina

message: :
Several things here that I'd question and/or change. 
* The first parenthesis is not closed; I'm guessing that ')' should replace the first comma.
* What languages use Iryna, and why is its Cyrillic spelling not shown?
* What, if anything, does the last sentence mean?
—Tamfang (talk) 19:38, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  quibbles
Talk:Józef Pułaski

message: The son later became famous in America with an Americanized version of his name, nevertheless in the article about his father the consistent Polish spelling should be used. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The son
Talk:1620s

message: Considering that the Important personalities section is becoming increasing cluttered with more and more people being added to it, I am thinking of re-organizing it by placing the individuals on the list into more specific categories, though not right now. Here are some categories and sub-categories that I think should be created:
*Architects
*Artists
**Painters
**Sculptors
*Economists
*Explorers and Colonists
**Explorers (and other travellers)
**Colonists and Colonizers
*Historians
*Jurists
**Judges
**Lawyers
*Mathematicians
*Merchants
*Militarymen
*Musicians
**Composers
**Instrumentalists
**Vocalists
*Philosophers
*Pirates
*Politicians/Statesmen
**Diplomats
**National level figures
**Regional level figures
*Scholars
*Scientists
**Astronomers
**Engineers
*Theologians
*Writers
**Literary writers
**Playwrights
**Poets
If anyone reading this feels that I might be missing important categories or simply wants to provide suggestions, feel free to respond with your comments. Fuelsaver (talk) 23:13, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-organization of Important personalities section
Talk:Vladislaus II of Opole

message: Wasn't he the governor of the Duchy of Belz (1377/1378-1387) for Louis of Hungary? Can anybody confirm? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:41, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Duchy of Belz]]

message: Some very dodgy English syntax and grammar here which render parts of the article unintelligible to anyone unfamiliar with the subject matter.  Article needs to be reworked by an English speaking specialist! 86.138.117.166 (talk) 12:00, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality of English in the article

message: I don't think that Vladislaus variant is good. Why not use the one correct Polish variant, Władysław Opolczyk? Or Władysław II of Opole --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:35, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Vladislaus is an English version of the Polish Władysław, and this is a royal name, like Francis I of France, Andrew III of Hungary or Sigismund I the Old. --Norden1990 (talk) 16:09, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

text: There is more than one English version of Vladislav, that's the problem. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:45, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

text: I think this version is the most common, in addition it's a Latinized English form. --Norden1990 (talk) 12:15, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Zapp's

message: The article states Zapps chips are cooked in peanut oil.  Now the label reads that they are cooked in peanut oil OR a blend of peanut oil and a variety of other inexpensive oils.  There is no way to tell if a package of chips is made with peanut oil or a blend of questionable oils mixed with one drop of peanut oil. 98.100.240.207 (talk) 21:37, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zapps cooked in peanut oil statement.
Talk:Honda TRX450R

message: Ok, for christ's sake. the pictures i am using for this wiki were given to me by the people who took the picture, emailed the picture, and own the atv and everything in the picture. they have me permission to use the image just for this, or anything else i wanted too. Maquereautin (talk) 01:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Alcetas II of Macedon

message: The only reference here is to Plato (who was no historian) but makes it clear that Alcetas was still alive after Perdikkas' death.  Plato does not explicitly say that Alcetas was king merely that Perdikkas deprived him of his rightful inheritance.  R M Errington's History of Macedonia has Perdikkas suceed his father without a break.  Unless someone can come up with a modern historian that lists him as king I suggest that this page be moved to a heading that does not imply he was king and it be rewritten.Dejvid (talk) 13:03, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm certain he was never king. Neither Blackwell's A Companion to Ancient Macedonia nor Brill's Companion to Ancient Macedon Studies make any mention of Alcetas as anything other than Perdiccas' brother. Moreover, the cited passage in Plato doesn't really mention Alcetas as king (as far as I can tell). Unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary, I'll be removing any reference to Alcetas as king. BusterTheMighty (talk) 04:08, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Was Alcetas ever King?
Talk:Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the 1979 hostage crisis

message: Can you get a comparison image, like these:      —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.67.12 (talk) 04:15, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison images 

message: Why does it say "Washington based Council on Foreign Relations" when the CFR is New York-based with a Washington satellite office? 
As for substance, I note that neither of the most fluent Farsi speakers at the Embassy, political officers who were both hostages, Mike Metrinko and John Limbert, are cited in the article as having commented on the issue. Knowing that witness identification in court is so often faulty and that the others at the Embassy who were accredited as "language officers" did not have true fluency, I am left wondering. It's entirely possible that for reasons of diplomatic convenience (not that anybody in State or the White House likes Ahmadinejad) it is not deemed desirable to exclude his travel to New York for UN meetings.
"Bani-Sadr" is spelled two different ways in the text.
Finally: there was a demonstration at the Embassy a few days earlier, one which I recall as having been taken more seriously by the RSO and the Chargé than the one on November 4 (meaning that employees were, as I recall, sent home for the earlier demonstration but not on November 4). I wonder whether there was any connection between the two; I haven't previously been attentive to writings on the Embassy invasion either on Wikipedia or elsewhere so what do I know; and I have forgotten details of the day after 30 years. 
Andygx (talk) 09:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other 
Talk:Dagmar Kersten

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drives
Want to help write or improve biographies? Check out WikiProject Biography Tips for writing better articles. -- Yamara 01:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Eastern Australian sawshark

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 18:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 