Talk:Pharming (genetics)

message: Transgenic production in animals is more advanced than that in plants, so we should not merge this topic under a plant-specific topic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bridwood (talk • contribs) 16:28, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: I strongly suggest we stop with the warring and try to talk this out. Several editors are on the verge of a block. Jusdafax  05:59, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Pharming (genetics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121027101102/http://protalix.com/procellex-platform/overview-procellex-platform.asp to http://protalix.com/procellex-platform/overview-procellex-platform.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130529030847/http://www.globes.co.il:80/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=1000745325&fid=1725 to http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=1000745325&fid=1725
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121001022426/http://www.medicago.com:80/English/Technologies/Why-Plants/Alfalfa/default.aspx to http://www.medicago.com/English/Technologies/Why-Plants/Alfalfa/default.aspx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.seedquest.com/News/releases/2003/august/6457.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello, all. I'm in a scientific writing class where we improve a Wikipedia article as part of a unit on writing for the public. I'm hoping to elaborate on and expand the "in plants" section of this page and I hope we can all work together.
I'd like to add more information of the specific advantages and disadvantages of using plants, which may possibly sound redundant with some of the information on the controversy section. I'd also like to add an overview of the genetic engineering process, mentioning some of the most common "players" in plant engineering- cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter, Agrobacterium mediated transformation, tobacco plants, etc., adding a figure if possible. Additionally, I want to include some of the ways researchers have been trying to improve yield and purification processes. Finally, the last paragraph seems broad and poorly cited. I'd like to go into further depth about what plants are being used and why, adding some cited examples.
Mountainrose127 (talk) 12:22, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving "In Plants" Section 

message: Moolec Science has recently gotten USDA approval for Piggy Sooy, a soybean that expresses porcine myoglobin in the seeds. The company seems to use the term "molecular farming" for a different purpose than what the redirect molecular farming is doing right now: it's making a transgenic protein in a plant, but the protein is not a pharmaceutical, just a (hopefully) meaty-tasting food component. Artoria2e5 🌉 04:51, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  molecular farming, but not pharming