Talk:Ford Duratec engine

message: You know, I think that is a great idea.  The 4 cylinder and 6 cylinder designs have nothing in common but a blue oval...  I would be glad to help as much as possible.
-=----------------
Could anyone state what sort of engine is this ? 
etis.ford.com reported on the VIN Number:
Version: 	  Series 30
Engine:           1.25 Zetec-S / Duratec DOHC EFI (75PS)
Local Police registration authorities stated in the vehicle registration certificate:
1242 cmc 
Code: JH1/FUJA I
Is this engine related in any way to the paragraph on "The advanced Zetec-SE was developed in collaboration of Yamaha and Mazda, under the Sigma codename"
Why is it codenamed FUJA and not Zetec ?
:Support I Support the proposal to separate the engines into their respective families and leave Duratec as a disambiguation page. VX1NG (talk) 13:50, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separating families from marketing names 

message: The Mazda MZI, Duratec ST, and Duratec SE 3.0L are all variants of the basic RFF, built down the same line, and very difficult to distinguish from one another... not sure how best to incorporate that in the article...  I'll try to post a summary of applications here if that will help.  The new Fusion/Milan/Zephyr motor is also an RFF variant.--Pmeisel 05:21, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  More name games 

message: I see 232 HP for the Jag and Lincoln using DAMB...but the page claims the existence of 3.0L duratecs up to 240 HP. Is this just rounding or do such things exist?--Skunkworx 23:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  HP Rounding 

message: The 6.0L from the GT90 was based on two 90-degree V-8 blocks, not two V-6's.
--Eljamoquio 20:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  6.0L GT90 

message: I'm removing this section under References:
::The Aston Martin V12 engine was designed at Ford Research in the USA. Cosworth Technologies was originally contracted to manufacture the engine, but had no involvement with the design. Previous articles which correctly recount this engine's development have appeared in Automotive Industries magazine.
It contradicts other information in the article, and if in fact it is valid, it doesn't belong under "References".  The submitter needs to learn how to properly edit the article.  Kythri 19:37, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm removing it entirely.  There is no reference, and the original engine was designed by Ford's Advanced Engines.--Eljamoquio 21:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cosworth Involvement 

message: I am not so into this topic but have a question. The Volvo 5 cilinder engines are sometimes (and implicite also on this page) called duratec engines. Is this correct because in some places they are not called duratec?
Who can clarify?
Robkraai (talk) 08:41, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Volvo

message: The European 1.8 L (1796 cc) and 2.0 L (1988 cc) units are not based on Mazda MZR engine; the displacements are the same as for the Zetec SE (Sigma family), while Mazda versions displace at 1798 cc and 1999 cc. This clearly indicates that Duratec HE uses very similar engine block, and even if it uses some technology from the MZR family, it's still heavily revised all-alloy Sigma block, not a Mazda L or Z block. Despite all the blah blah blah about "our new global engine", Ford just plays the same confusing name games with its old stuff... See these links for some technical details    --91.76.190.143 (talk) 12:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duratec HE 

message: There is no Focus 2.3 or EcoSport 2.3 here in Brazil, only 2.0 ones. I suggest to remove both models from the "2.3" section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.103.60.156 (talk) 18:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focus 2.3 

message: why are outside engines included in this list? HeHORN (talk) 21:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong engines 

message: Which Duratec engine is the one utilised for Formula Ford racing? There are links pointing here but it's not clear to what its refering to. --Falcadore (talk) 19:36, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula Ford racing 

message: There seems to be everlasting confusion regarding the origin of the major "Duratec" I4 engines. 
If your Duratec or EcoBoost, petrol or diesel, has the following bore and stroke dimension:
78mm x 83.6mm - 1.6L 
83mm x 83.1mm - 1.8L 
87.5mm x 83.1mm - 2.0L 
87.5mm x 94mm - 2.3L 
89mm x 100mm - 2.5L 
86mm x 86mm - 2.0L Diesel 
86mm x 94mm -2.2L Diesel 
then it is absolutely and definitively a 100% Mazda engineered long block. Not co-engineered, purely derived from the brains in Hiroshima. Cheers  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.56.242.254 (talk) 01:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: So, are Europe Duratec-HE and American Duratec based on the same Mazda L-engine and what are the differences, if any? We someone who has experience with Ford engines and service manuals, so we can clarify this once and for all.  --Dmitry (talk •contibs ) 17:42, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

text: 1.25/1.4/1.6 Duratec engine is SIGMA platform and it's 100% FORD.
1.8/2.0 Duratec HE are upgraded Mazda engines, the new DI Ti-VCT 2.0 160 hp in MkIII Focus in USA is upgraded 2.0 Duratec HE.
http://www.fordmedia.eu/presskits/2008FordFocus/_data/var/doc.htm
79mm x 81.4mm - 1.6L  100% ford
83mm x 83.1mm - 1.8L  Mazda upgrade
87.5mm x 83.1mm - 2.0L  Mazda upgrade
87.5mm x 94mm - 2.3L  Mazda, used in North America
83mm x 93.2mm - 2.5L Volvo modular engine upgraded for Focus ST
85mm x 88mm - 2.0L Diesel  Ford and PSA not Mazda
also
3.5/3.7 L V6 in USA is Ford Cyclone engines used by Ford and Mazda
1.6/2.0 Ecoboost is FORD engine but it's used by Volvo, Range Rover
Z interactive (talk) 22:15, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

text: The question was "are Duratec-HE and the American Duratec are the same as Mazda L-engine" and I still can't hear the answer to that. --188.123.231.4 (talk) 03:31, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duratec 4 cylinder engines