Talk:Moon for sale

message: Seems like there is a bit of a revert war going on here... Personally, this needs some arbitration. Logical2u 21:28, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted because I saw huge swaths of text being deleted by anonymous users with no edit summaries and no discussion on the Talk page so that shot up red flags for me.  I trust someone with actual knowledge of and interest in this topic (i.e. not me) to make the right call about this article's content.  --ElKevbo 21:54, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Revert wars continue. .38 is still doing the same thing he was before, but this time I can't see precisely why. Maybe if we merge the articles they both wrote? Logical2u 10:15, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert Wars?

message: I have sneaky suspicions that every edit on this page in the last few days, including my own reverts, have probably not been of a neutral point of view. At the moment, we have an anonymous user causing most of our problems. 
This user is either a sock puppet for the Lunar Federation, or is a bit of a new user and doesn't know our policies. This user has made numerous edits that have been construed as vandalism, such as Dennis Hope, and this vandalism is primarily an advert for Lunar Federation.
However, I am unsure of how to proceed with this article, as he presents SOME useful information in his reverts. I'd like to merge it in, but 1. I'm new, and I have little to no clue of how to do that, and 2. I suspect some of the information isn't correct.
I'd like both an arbitrator here to look at this page and recent edits for neutrality, and to find a NPOV everyone can agree on, and also to resolve .38's problems. 
Thanks for reading.
Sincerely, a very concerned Logical2u 18:49, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of View Conflict. 

message: Until all propaganda and advertisements for Nevada is taken off this site, including all advertisements to direct the consumer to their website, this website will be EDITED non stop
More informationa about all companies selling land on the Moon most notably: Lunar Federation Inc which has received MASS MEDIA coverage this year at the Academy Awards.
*Listen, UfViper, I gave you PLENTY of chance to explain your edits, and if you wanted to contribute freely, you had the chance. However, you abused that chance by turning one sort of propaganda into another. As for now, I'm s-protecting this page so that we here have time to figure this out. Logical2u 19:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Press releases are not verifiable statements of fact.  They are, by definition, *very* POV documents and therefore very poor sources for facts of the type we are discussing.  And please don't tell anyone what is and is not "staying in the article."  Wikipedia is a collaboration among many editors and what stays or goes is determined by consensus not by one individual, no matter how expert their self-evaluated opinion.  Talk to us and keep working with us!  Some of your edits have been helpful and we're finally making positive progress!  --ElKevbo 20:29, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Hi Ufviper/Moonland. Many of your edits are very helpful, and we are making good progress with this article. However, as per above, the press releases of the Lunar Embassy are not exactly the NPOV needed. While I have located a few instances of the treaty in question, most if not all have been written by the company for the sole intent of, I suppose, advertising. As you seem to be an expert, I invite you to find an independent source from the internet (IE: The UN or a legal consulting group) that may provide a final citation to the article. So far, so good, Logical2u 21:12, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert wars & NPOV allegations 

message: This page has been merged and redirected following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:03, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD debate link