lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:BBC review

message: I don't have any objections if you wish to merge the two articles, although personally I feel that 'Creative Future' is a better and more useful heading - as the term is used so often in the press nowadays. Most of the info about 'Creative Future' was taken from the BBC Press Office - but I don't believe a word of it.
Here is an excerpt from my blog:
BBC 'Creative Future' a creative 'con trick'
Mark Thompson announced his 'vision' of things to come on 25 April 2006. It is known as 'Creative Future' and it's a kind of umbrella term which seems to enable BBC management to do whatever they like. Damson88 10:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not up on the story but as of now the article Creative future seems about a biased as an article could be.  Merge them: strip away the POV and there'll not be much left to merge.  As for what the title should be ... I say I'm not up on things but the title Creative Future?  This sounds about as biased as the the article itself (the one under that title).  There's been no objection in two months.  I'm merging the two articles.  The merge will consist of copying and pasting the quote: this is the only non-biased part of the article (though added, I'm sure, with baised intent; it's a quote though, so tells us more of the mastermind than of his dubious scheme).  As for Creative Future's being more useful: it's useless to me.  I don't live in the UK nor am I from there.  Half a dozen years down the track this'll all have blown over and my guess is that even the Brits & N. Irish will have forgotten about it.  BBC Review is more descriptive to me (no, not very but a whole lot more).  In a few years it may be more descriptive to those it effects. Jimp 13:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from ''[[Creative future]]''
Talk:Creative future

message: I don't have any objections if you wish to merge the two articles, although personally I feel that 'Creative Future' is a better and more useful heading - as the term is used so often in the press nowadays. Most of the info about 'Creative Future' was taken from the BBC Press Office - but I don't believe a word of it.
Here is an excerpt from my blog:
BBC 'Creative Future' a creative 'con trick'
Mark Thompson announced his 'vision' of things to come on 25 April 2006. It is known as 'Creative Future' and it's a kind of umbrella term which seems to enable BBC management to do whatever they like. Damson88 10:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Royal Rumble (1991)

message: is all messed up. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.172.77.168 (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are listed in the order the entered. The number on the right is when they were eliminated (and it is correct). TJ Spyke 21:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Elimination Order

message: Was any reason given for this? 118.42.219.133 (talk) 05:10, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Macho Man's no show?
Talk:Socialist Alternative (Australia)

message: Why does Mick Armstrong link to the History section of this article? Jack Upland (talk) 01:06, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Mick is one of the founders and leaders of Socialist Alternative. He still writes for the Red Flag today. -AndreyKva (talk) 01:15, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that supported with WP:RS? Otherwise just seems like a bit of promotion for Mick's writing. TarnishedPathtalk 01:52, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fair enough. There's not much written online about their founders or leaders, so I don't have any sources for him founding or leading the organization, but he still frequently writes for Socialist Alternative's paper: https://redflag.org.au/author/mick-armstrong I didn't set up the disambiguation, but I'm pretty sure his affiliation with Red Flag is the reason. I wouldn't argue that it's necessarily a good reason. -AndreyKva (talk) 03:01, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

text: , there is way too WP:OR in this article and other claims which aren't backed up by citations. I tagged the article other a month ago that it had a problem with citations, so if you see problems then I say you should go ahead and do something about it. TarnishedPathtalk 06:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

text: My point is that Mick isn't mentioned here, so why the link?--Jack Upland (talk) 00:10, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean the link to "From Little Things Big Things Grow". I've removed it. It's a publication by Mick and so belongs on an article on him, if he has one. Otherwise can you be more specific? TarnishedPathtalk 07:00, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mick Armstrong]]
Talk:Casa Pia

message: I think ist's better to merge the two articles.
Anmasagosi 10:36, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Black Like Me (film)

message: This article is underdeveloped and is missing information on the film's production, release, and reception which should be added in separate sections in the article. Also The article is missing an image of the film's release poster which should be added to the article's infobox.--Paleface Jack (talk) 22:01, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion and Missing Information
Talk:Skint

message: I'm not sure I understand the reasons for deletion. Skint is a common word, used widely, is it not normal to have definitions of words in wikipedia? Maybe I've misunderstood the purpose after all. buck, which is a slang term for a dollar is here, quid, which is a slang term for a pound is here,... why is "skint" not acceptable?
:Hi! Take a look at Wikipedia's official policy on what Wikipedia is not. I'll take the matter in front of other editors to discuss, let's see if we can find consensus. Weregerbil 12:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. To clarify: I'm not looking to debate it, more to understand the distinction. Is there a discussion forum where these decisions take place?--Neilajh 13:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skint. You might want to read Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary for more information on this policy. Note that Wiktionary already has a definition of skint. —Caesura(t) 15:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:C. L. Max Nikias

message: This article still needs to be expanded. Among other things, his date of birth and the Greek-language version of his name would be helpful. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 10:47, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates
Talk:Intersubjectivity

message: Following passage is removed.  Citation requested in April, now here for the record.: ... 10:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rmvd passage

message: Test link and my opinion: this link is spam:
http://www.psychematters.com/papers/benjamin.htm
--Laboratorio.Ricerche.Evolutive (talk) 01:15, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: My opinion

message: This term is a philosophical one and comes from phenomenology, its most common connotation is to  refer to relations between the self and others, or between thinking subjects generally, as the name implies and as distinct category, not a "multi-subjectivity". 72.228.177.92 (talk) 17:21, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Appears to have been cleaned up some since above, still fails to put in context of continental philosophy of which it is a characteristic and traditional element. 72.228.190.243 (talk) 13:29, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong, Doof, as is often the case in the backwaters of wikipedia 

message: "Intersubjectivity can also be understood as the process of psychological energy moving between two or more subjects. In a room where someone is lying on their deathbed, for example, the room can appear to be enveloped in a shroud of gloom for other people interacting with the dying person. The psychological weight of one subject comes to bear on the minds of others depending on how they react to it, thereby creating an intersubjective experience that, without multiple consciousnesses interacting with each other, would be otherwise strictly solitary. Love is a prime example of intersubjectivity that implies a shared feeling of care and affection, among others." --178.193.39.223 (talk) 15:58, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously? ;-) 

message: came to this page from a link on another wikipage that was discussing ev. psych. Therefore would be interesting to have something on the use of the term in that discipline here also.
--137.163.31.190 (talk) 13:43, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  ethology and evolutionary psychology 

message: Hello, 
I'm hoping to add information on intersubjectivity in relation to learning in Indigenous American communities to the bottom portions of this page. There is a small mention of intersubjectivity and infant development at the bottom that I will hope to reorganize and add a great deal to.
Thoughts?
-Sounds like a great idea. I was thinking of working on the Infant Development section as well; the mention of Colwyn Trevarthen could be expanded on a lot to add insight to this section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceruleanc (talk • contribs) 05:16, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding "Across Cultures"
Talk:Lyra Orphée

message: *The japanese name of the charater Orpheus from the Greek mythology is オルペウス (Orubeusu = Orpheus), or オルフェウス (Orufeusu = Orpheus). But while the name of the Saint Seiya movie character is indeed オルフェウス (Orpheus), Kurumada named his manga character オルフェ (Orufe = Orphee), which is the French form of the name, Orphée .</br> As for when he named the Aquarius Gold Saint Camus after the French writer Albert Camus, Kurumada probably made a reference to Cocteau's movie "Orphée" (1950).</br> However I didn't know if I had to put the character "é" in the title of the article : Orphee or Orphée ? Folken de Fanel 10:51, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Orufe' is simply the rendition in japanese of the french form of "Orpheus", that is, Orphée.Folken de Fanel (talk) 21:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming convention
Talk:SC Albi

message: I have reverted the previous edit of the stadium name from Le Stade Municipal to le Stadium municipal because that is what it is called by both the rugby club and the town. It even has Stadium d'Albi emblazoned on the entrance arch. (Ajkgordon 10:57, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Isis Unveiled

message: Regarding this removal of newspaper review quotes: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Isis_Unveiled&diff=prev&oldid=1143753758 The Blavatsky.net website is in general, of course, not a reliable source for this topic. But the newspapers quotes themselves are quite useful secondary sources for that section - and such reviews are very difficult to find 150 years after the fact. My question is if it is fully justified to remove them completely.
They are merely 'quoted in' the linked to website. If today a publisher places the quotes of reviews on a book cover - is that really so problematic a source to copy? Do you need to have seen the newspaper/review itself?
I understand it is better if they are corroborated using another source, but in the meantime my suggestion is to add them back, additionally listing the need for a (better) source for each quote. I tried to google a bit, but it is difficult to find these old newspapers - many were abolished long ago.
I heard there is a 'collected writings' edition of all Blavatsky's work and that it is published by a different publisher. Part of the editorial process was that every reference in Blavatsky's writings was double checked. That may be a lead. 2001:1C02:280A:5600:CC51:39E5:A7F8:4268 (talk) 23:23, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: None of it is reliable I am afraid. You need scholarly sources written by historians or academics published by recognized publishing companies, or from peer-reviewed academic papers. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:47, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable source
Talk:Robert Truax

message: See references for information that will be useful in expanding this article. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 11:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: I ran across an interview article that mentioned Bob Truax being 63 years old in 1981, but so far no obituaries.  If he's still alive, he'd be about 90 now.  Information, anyone?  When I last saw him in the 1980s, he was living in Saratoga, California. —QuicksilverT @ 17:51, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm his son and can verify he is still alive. He currently resides in Southern California with his wife Marisol and her family. Afterimage (talk) 06:56, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth & Death dates? 

message: On an episode of The Jim Rome Show, Knieval accused Truax of not only badly engineering his Snake River Canyon stunt motorcycle, he also accused him of being "a know-it-all little b******" and that he designed the Appolo I rocket in such a manner that it "burnt Gus Grissom to death."
High accusation, but I don't known how to put that on the Truax article.--The Saxon 04:58, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't belong in the Truax article.  If, and only if it can be verified, it belongs in the Evel Knievel article.  Considering the kind of reputation Mr. Knievel has, even if the statement can be verified, it's probably not true anyway, making it tantamount to slander.  If you read Truax's biography carefully, you'll see he never worked for NASA, and certainly not for any contractor who designed and built the Command Module for Apollo.  His rocketry career was mostly in the U.S. Navy, making Knievel's claim all the more dubious.  By the way, the name is not spelled "Eval Knieval".  Gus Grissom died in the Apollo 1 disaster, not Appolo I. —QuicksilverT @ 18:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Evel's opinion of the rocket built for him by Truax would certainly be a fitting addition to this article IF there is a direct quote that can be referenced or linked to.  Truax's career and "reputation" is based in very large part on the Evel Knieval rocket, with the rest based on dubious claims made by Truax himself. He contributed to some missile programs and worked on some interesting projects.  And that's all. 98.194.39.86 (talk) 00:05, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eval Knieval accusation 

message: Just passin' through, but I was stunned (not literally of course) by the appearance of this article. Normally bold text is only used for the article subject and any relevant redirects (eg alternate names for the subject) -- check WP:MOS. Here there are great patches of it, together with quite a lot of links, relative to the length of narrative text, and it's rather an assault on the eyes compared with the normal formatting of a WP article. It would benefit from some toning down. -- EdJogg (talk) 20:19, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much bold!!
Talk:Vue International

message: It should be noted that some of the less profitable Warner Village cinemas were shut down after the SBC takeover (for example, the one at Manors, in Newcastle upon Tyne, closed in 2004 and was demolished very recently). 220.157.83.11 11:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closures 

message: Vue Corporate Site clearly states that Blackburn was the first purpose built, could you cite your source for Harrow? -Jrgnet 08:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the text from the article regarding this.  The first problem is that it was confusingly contradictory, with both claims remaining.  The other problem is that the link you have supplied does not work.  Perhaps it's a registered user link only, but that therefore means that it isn't a good enough citation.  violet/riga (t) 08:19, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harrow or Blackburn? First Purpose Built 

message: This section suggests that you can only purchase tickets from the concessions counter, when in fact the new system means you can purchase tickets from both the concessions counter and the box office. Needs slight rewording. TheIslander 16:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vista Ticketing

message: I propose merging SBC International Cinemas into this article because it is 2 lines of text which are repeated at the start of this article. Mark999 (talk) 02:45, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: The cineworld article claims that cine world is the second largest chain and they both can't be. This article claims there are 80 sites, cine world claims 81. I'm not sure which is right, but one is wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.89.134.78 (talk) 00:28, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd largest chain
Talk:Adashino Nenbutsu-ji

message: I may be wrong, but afair there is nothing like a soul in buddhism. --149.229.96.18 11:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Souls?

message: Shouldn't this be moved to "Adashino Nenbutsu-ji"? According to Google, Nenbutsu-ji is more popular. Moocows rule 02:28, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved?
Talk:I Ching (disambiguation)

message: Page I Ching (monk) has been in existence about 2 years while page Yi Jing has only been created less than three months ago. So, why should I Ching (monk) redirect to Yi Jing instead of the other way round? Furthermore, key word "I Ching" far supercede "Yi Jing" at Google fight.
Hence, I suggest we reinstate I Ching (monk) as the article page. __earth (Talk) 11:38, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Ching vs. Yi Jing
Talk:Adaptive Design

message: Adaptive design appears to be a rather hollow trademark for management consultancy. I couldn't find much on their page that could be classified as a proper explanation what it actually is. --Fasten 11:39, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.--Runcorn 12:32, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

text: agreed as well
Perhaps the page could be redirected to Adaptive technology. As this is how the Adaptive Design Association seems to interpret the phrase Adaptive Design. --Godzig 20:56, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

text: It's either that or the article gets an afd for blatant advertising. This way's faster, though. --144.131.240.247 08:42, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Teispes

message: The guys who are working on his father (Achaemenes) think his father was imaginary! If he was imaginary how did he make him? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Achaemenes  Kiumars 11:49, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What a mess!

message: It seems he captured Elam in 646 BC, as said in the book, From Cyrus to Alexander, p. 17, then second submission after 834 BC? is the submission of Cyrus I to the Assyrians, he sends his son Arukku as a hostage, just a minor note.--Amerana (talk) 03:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Capture of Elam

message: Might be a good idea to actually mention somewhere in the article that Teispes has something to do with Persia? Anyone no familiar with Persian history will ask himself: who the hell are all these people? Where are these places? Who was Cyrus the great? Etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.254.215.2 (talk) 03:26, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Persian?

message: Since he is a persian, we should write the persian version of his name first. Then we can write the greek one.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsaces (talk • contribs) 11:56, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Persian name
Talk:Polaris Music Prize

message: A quick and probably silly question, but is the $20,000 prize in Canadian dollars, or the converted value in United States dollars? GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 13:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup it's in CAD.  I'll add that to the article. --Madchester 16:45, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Quick question
Talk:Helene Hayman, Baroness Hayman

message: At Wikipedia:Recent additions 76 (the archive for Did you know?) it states:
...that Helene Hayman, Baroness Hayman, elected the first Lord Speaker of the House of Lords in 2006, was the first woman to give birth while serving as a British Member of Parliament in the 1970s, and is reported to have been the first woman to breast feed at the Palace of Westminster?
This claim is repeated in the article. No source is given in the article, and for the record its not true. The first MP to give birth whilst serving was Beatrice Wright back in the 1940s, not Helene Hayman. --New Progressive 11:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mandane of Media

message: Re: Some modern scholars think that Herodotus' stories about the dynastic links between Cyrus the Great and the kingdoms he later conquered (Media, Lydia and Babylonia) are propaganda.
Why Herodotus would do that propaganda?
Re: Mandane was well below the age of marriage when she was given to Cambyses.
What was the age of marriage those days? My grandmother married at the age of 10 and had her first baby in the first year of marriage and was only 11 years older than her first child! Some girls reach puberty at the age of 8-9!
Kiumars 12:14, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Analysis

message: What is her original/Median name? I need it.203.162.3.167 (talk) 12:41, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you find even Old Persian form please add it. You ask a difficult question: The median form is probably completely lost, but Old Persian usually respects the Median form of the words and I could not find the Old Persian form of Mandanae. Xashaiar (talk) 16:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her original/Median name 

message: Mandane appears in Mlle de Scudery's romance Artamene ou le Grand Cyrus as the princess he loves and finally his wife.
71.163.117.143 (talk) 13:52, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  cultural reference
Talk:Justice as Fairness

message: I've nominated this page for reconsideration. Thedaggerz (talk) 14:30, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Class

message: "and to the greatest benefit of the least well-off members of society." 
That is not quite right: his idea is that everyone is free to do as they wish toward improving their own position provided this does not make the least well-off any worse off.  Pepper  150.203.227.130 12:37, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  not quite 

message: Why is Justice as Fairness capitalized and italicized in the lede? —Tamfang (talk) 21:47, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sort of both. I clarified it a bit.Greg Bard (talk) 22:39, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good job. —Tamfang (talk) 23:11, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  is it a concept or a title? 

message: Regrettably, I've had to downgrade the article from 'B' to 'C' class; since the article was rated as 'B' class back in February 2011, the article has lost cohesion as a result of a few changes. For instance, there was a sentence in the section on the second principle that was expecting a quote, but had lost it. There were a few other minor things that I've tidied up for now, but I feel that the article needs more work to regain cohesion and on incorporating citations into footnotes (there are a number of references not clearly represented in the footnotes, such Avineri, S. and de-Shalit, A. (ed.) (1992)). — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 13:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Downgraded from 'B' to 'C' class