lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:GFDL-self-with-disclaimers

message: I was asked to provide an explanation.
*All free images on all wikis will ideally be moved to commons.
*It would be on the best interest of the common goal of the free encyclopedia (Wikipedia) and free image repository (Commons) for the license templates to have identical naming.
*Naming of license templates on commons are done with multilingualism in mind. A person editing/reviewing commons may not necessarily know any English. Preferably we avoid giving any language a priority. The -en here is the ISO code for English.
*"with-disclaimers" is a problem not unique to English wikipedia. There were wikis that copied the en.wikipedia license template with it's emphasis on disclaimers. This can cause a possible problems when images are moved to commons because we have many flavors of the GFDL template.
-- Cat chi? 05:10, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of the move from {{tl|GFDL-self-with-disclaimers}} to {{tl|GFDL-self-en}} 

message: See Template_talk:GFDL-self#Putting_into_a_sub_category_of_Category:GFDL_images. --MGA73 (talk) 11:43, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Putting into a sub category of [[:Category:GFDL images]] 

message: The template needs to be fixed by inserting right-brace "}" in the unclosed triple curly braces of parameter dw in "{{#ifeq:{|yes" before the "|yes". The syntax glitch was introduced on 15 May 2013 (see edit: dif509), as a link to redlink Template:Dw in 20,282 pages. After update, then the edit-preview of this template will no longer show "Template:Dw" in the list of templates used.Impact: Over 20,280 pages. -Wikid77 (talk) 09:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Nice catch! — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 11:52, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix parameter dw used as template
Talk:List of Sly Cooper characters

message: While I didn't put in the merge proposal, I definitely support it. Randomran (talk) 21:54, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: This article needs to be condensed.  I will when I have the time (which is rare), but anyone who does and knows a good bit about Sly Cooper, please go ahead.  BlueCanary9999 (talk) 22:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Condense 

message: All four character articles nominated for deletion (see top of talk page) have been merged to here sans blatantly unencyclopedic material, such as trivia. These sections are still, however, unreferenced and consisting of original research. I will tag the entire article as appropriate. Any talk about splitting the article back needs to be discussed on this talk page as recommended at WP:SPLIT; keep in mind doing that with no significant improvements can result in another AfD. Thank you, MuZemike (talk) 22:03, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  All four articles merged 

message: Ok... Ive been off for a while but what the hell happened to Carmelita's pages, she used to have 3 pages worth of Info, now its gone for some reason, please explain someone- for this is a bad Idea-
kjl (talk) 05:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CARMELITA FOX- what happened to her article????? 

message: For whoever cares, some reception has been found for Carmelita and Sly. Go here to get it. Blake (Talk·Edits) 04:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 
Talk:Sir Wilfrid Laurier School Board

message: These have information about communities within this school board
*http://www.swlauriersb.qc.ca/docs/CSSWL_Carte_2008_v2.pdf
*http://www.swlauriersb.qc.ca/english/governance/elections/maps/Maps%20English/Ward%204%20ENG.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 03:38, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional files
Talk:Horny (Dungeon Keeper)

message: "In the first game, it was difficult to get "Horny" under your command, available only in the last few levels."
Not in my experience. On level 9, there was a temple with a mistress, bile demon and troll that'd join you. Sacrifice those three, and you get Horny. Lesson learned for next levels. Also, since that level, there has been a 'transport creature' special box in at least the following 10 levels, so you could keep him (fully trained) with you. Thus you had him, or at least know how to get him, for the biggest part of the game. 193.190.253.150 11:47, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difficult to get under command?
Talk:Constitution of 1782

message: I was thinking of changing the name to "Grattan's Parliament". It's about more than 1 piece of legislation. Is there any citations for the name "Constitution of 1782"?   What to you think? Laurel Lodged (talk) 17:17, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't agree with a name change, though the article needs a lot of work in any case. The "constitution" was not a single piece of legislation, but rather the unwritten constitution of the Kingdom of Ireland between the "revolution of 1782" and the union of 1801. Just as :Category:Constitutional laws of the United Kingdom includes some acts of parliament (as well as law of other types) so the constitution of the Kingdom of Ireland included some acts of parliament passed in 1782: several acts of the Irish Parliament and two of the British parliament (the second in 1783 rather than 1782 but no matter). Precisely which acts are part of the "constitution" or "revolution" is a matter of opinion. User:Jnestorius/Constitution of 1782#Table is a list from my jotter. Not all of these relate to the operation of the Parliament of Ireland. In brief, I think "Constitution of 1782" is the best name for what the good version of the present article would cover: the buildup to the 1782–3 changes; what changed in 1782–3; how the constitutional framework operated (and failed) up to the union; how the period was seen through rose-tinted lenses by later Irish nationalists.   jnestorius(talk) 17:45, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Jnestorius (and I'm knocked out by the sandbox page!). This article is properly about the constitution, not about a period of time. Poynings' Law and the Sixth of George I should only be in a Background section, with all the things Jnestorius said in the main article body. Can you please change I have changed the first sentence back pending the outcome of this discussion.[edited 18:10, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

text: By the way, I didn't get an alert; I only found this when I checked my watchlist. If you add a new username to a ping in a subsequent edit, you have to change the date and time stamp.  Scolaire (talk) 11:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK so. I don't really agree all that strongly. Personally I think that "constitution" in the case of the UK is a convenient legal fiction. Certainly to dignify any single piece of legislation with the title "The Constiitution of  Foo" is to convey a weight, dignity and authority on it that it probably does not possess. Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change proposal 

message: The first paragraph was changed by  by  with an edit summary of "clarify, wikify". To my mind, it does not clarify at all. Since  linked to his sandbox page in the section above, I am going to copy the first paragraph of that draft to this article, as I believe it is much better than either the new or the previous version.  Scolaire (talk) 11:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  First paragraph
Talk:Ugandi County

message: Current map image should be fixed to include full Ugandi county.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.65.192.85 (talk) 16:55, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map image 

message: Here the writer is wrong. The word derives from old Finno-Ugrian Otsonpää (Bear´s head). Otso is still used in Finnish language for bear, as well as Mesikämmen (Honey Bruin) among other names used for bear, the Metsän Kuningas King of the Forest. That is for sure the Otsonpää have not any Slavonic language roots as well as Ugandi. It derives from either Livonian
or Finnish-Estonian ancient common language. The same with name Pskov which derives from
ancient Finno-Ugrian Finnish Pihkova / and Estonian Pihkva which are both derived from Pihkava (lot of resin) which means Pitchy in English language. The Slavs changed it Piskov and Cyrillos in Kijev dropped i out of the word. The German Pleskau derives from Latvian Pleskavas, all meaning the same town.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.84.229 (talk) 19:05, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Origin of name Odenpah in Ugandi
Talk:Egg Beaters

message: The article needs a table comparing at least 5 items (cholesterol, fat, protein, carbohydrate, water) of whites, yolks, whole eggs, and each version of eggbeaters and any competitors for which info can be found. Each number will need a footnote indicating its source. Internal links to Wikipedia articles on cholesterol, eggs, etc, would also help. Numbersinstitute (talk) 02:14, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compare nutrition to eggs 

message: I rewrote most of the article, and removed the advert tag.  Here is a summary of what and why:
* General.  There were lots of awkward phrasings.  Some looked like they were from historical anomalies, such as the addition of a paragraph about the new Yolk product, then its discontinuance with a few inadequate edits.
* Factual - just rephrased and added vitamins and spices to make it more clear what it was
* Summarized Varieties - just not encyclopedic  or notable to have a detailed listing of each variety.  That's what really made it sound like Corporate spam
* Summarized Varieties - Ditto not encyclopedic  or notable.TjoeC (talk) 18:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite and cleanup

message: I was perplexed by the singular v. plural, but I just left it singular, although the company uses plural.  It does make for some funny sounding grammar.TjoeC (talk) 18:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Singular or plural 
Talk:Pro Cricket

message: With all due respect to the folks who contributed to this article, why does this article exist?  One of only two citations is from the website of the subject, and 99% of the information has no citations at all.  This is so promotional, subjective and weasel-word-filled ("apparently fell through," "many hoped"), it's a bit painful to read.  NewkirkPlaza (talk) 02:37, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  lack of notability
Talk:Solid fuel

message: The section on wood states: "It is also greenhouse gas neutral which means that the log being burned cannot produce any more carbon than was used by it during its life."
Is this true? And if so, is it not true trivially, i.e. is this not true of all solid fossil fuels? Wood is not alone in that it originates from carbon-based life-forms, and burning it releases that same carbon originally taken up.
If this comment is added here for wood there ought to be similar comments made for the other fuels. Is coal GHG neutral in the same sense? Or positive or negative?82.6.166.218 (talk) 12:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the article to reflect a more accurate view of whether wood is carbon neutral. This now brings it into line with the main wood fuel article and has its own citations. Stingray Trainer (talk) 22:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  GHG neutral? 

message: I have tidied up and reviewed this article. I removed a lot of uncited nonsense and poorly written bulking material. Bought the summaries into line with the primary articles for each title and linked them in. Arguably this entire page could be converted to a list that links to the properly written articles for each sub area. Stingray Trainer (talk) 22:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  March 2017 Copy Edit 

message: Someone knowledgable might add a section on dried dung as solid fuel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.213.157.254 (talk) 14:12, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dung 

message: I have added obvious omissions from the article and reverted clear vandalism. 109.150.216.44 (talk) 20:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Calorific value etc

message: I've removed this section as MSW is not actually a fuel as such. Incineration is a way of getting rid of it. If there is some calorific value in it OK but this doesn't justify calling it a solid fuel. If someone wants to put it back in it would need further explanation and a better reference. Also this statement is contradictory as all MSW would contain toxic materials: "However, this is technology heavy and can only be used where the waste is known not to contain toxic materials." Organic solid waste on the other hand could be used as part of bioenergy but this is already included in the section on biomass now. EMsmile (talk) 09:26, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed municipal solid waste
Template talk:PancaKhandha

message: This new diagram was motivated by the desire to modify the existing diagram in the Skandha article as follows:
* to create a flow, congruent with the Pali Canon, showing that Consciousness arises from Form
* to show the origins of Form, as indicated in the Sutta Pitaka, is from the Great Elements
* while, as indicated in the endnotes of the Skandha article, Bhikkhu Bodhi has maintained that "nama" includes only Feelings, Perceptions and Formations (which is also logically consistent with the Twelve Nidanas relationship between "nama-rupa" and Consiousness); other authorities (e.g., the PTS Pali-English Dictionary) state that "nama" includes Consciousness; thus, I felt the need to replace the term "nama" (which in the existing article does not include Consciousness) with the Abhidhammic "cetasika."  
Please free to discuss this further here or on the Skandha article's talk page at Talk:Skandha#Modification_of_.22Aggregates.27_Interaction.22_diagram.  Thanks. Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 19:45, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Motivation for new diagram
Talk:Soulcalibur IV

message: A guest character for Soul Calibur IV on xbox 360 i unlocked her. Maybe someone could add her? Thanks --72.73.71.233 (talk) 19:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: She is mentioned, but she really isn't a character, she is just a clone of Astroth with a different costume. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 20:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ashelotte? 

message: How come the reception section does not mention that the online play is totally broken and so laggy it's barely useable? The game will just pause multiple times per match.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.147.182.203 (talk) 01:43, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totally broken online play? 

message: The game is separate but effectively...it's the same game with different modes and two new characters replacing the SW cast (one of which is just a guest character in itself). It'd do better as a subsection of this article.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:35, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soulcalibur Broken Destiny merger 

message: Added a Character list to the top of the Characters section. Any questions please comment.  Tsquiddy (talk) 08:14, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character list added  

message: The pages for SoulCalibur II, SoulCalibur III and SoulCalibur IV all make mention of a "1590 A.D. trilogy." Other than the fact that the games are set within that year, is there any official source that actually makes mention of there being a "1590 A.D. trilogy?" I've checked "SoulCalibur: New Legends of Project Soul" and the Japanese SoulCalibur VI website, but I've come up with nothing. Doing a cursory search online only comes up with a fandom wikia page, but that's also unsourced. I tried doing a search in Japanese, but nothing comes up with there being a trilogy. The same user added the "1590 A.D. trilogy" term to all three pages. As far as I could tell, it seems like the term "1590 A.D. trilogy" is a made up fan-made term.
I'm relative new to editing Wikipedia, so I don't know if adding fan-made labels to Wikipedia pages is the norm or not. SneedfordStranger (talk) 06:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1590 A.D. trilogy?
Talk:Driver visibility

message: I (121.72.240.101) made a few changes to spelling and grammar, but then saw the "Proposed for deletion" tag and have realized that the article is beyond my capability and do therefore not have any further intention of improving it, and thus agree with the deletion. Pmi25 05:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling and Grammar 

message: I have removed the delete tag, tidied the article a bit, and suggested a merge with Blind spot, which covers the same ground. SilkTork 08:08, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This is a proven problem that a lot of people do not know of.
Please can i put this image back in the article ?
The problem is very clear and easy to explain.
thumb|A-pillar A-pillar blind-spots.PNG
--86.92.132.118 21:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slow and fast car speed crossroad image 

message: Everybody should easily find this information on the Internet?
The degree of the A-pillers blocked visibility
Regads, Stef Breukel --World arm lamp (talk) 17:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drivers-visibility in a horizon plane on eye-height 

message: ... and the associated talk page are hilarious. We've got some dude who brags about inventing a lamp writing essays, no idea what's going on anywhere, and a total disregard for the article at hand.  Love you guys,  ahanix.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.168.71.168 (talk) 20:22, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Article, 

message: The aerodynamics of the windshield did not change match the last 20 years, this is still 35 degree.
The angle of the a-pillar changed from 40 to 35 degree.
The Renault Twingo 1992 was the first production car with the a-pillar 35 degree
 
Regards, Stef  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.92.132.118 (talk) 16:55, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  section "Other automibile design factors" aerodynamics 

message: Quote:
"Other disadvantages of a flat windshield angle:
* Other traffic can not see the driver through the reflection if the driver can see them".
In my experience, a flat windshield angle also makes it difficult for the driver to see out in bright sunlight. Have other people had this experience? I think the best arrangement is a near-vertical windshield, as in a WWII jeep. Biscuittin (talk) 19:28, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windshield angle 

message: Yes I think it is a good idea,to mix this page with blind spot automobile.
If it does not work we an chance is back
Greetings , Stef ,Worldarmlamp  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.92.132.118 (talk) 13:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this page with "blind spot automobile"
Talk:Erna Gunther

message: German Wikipedia (de WP) has an entry on Herman Haeberlin, :de:Herman Karl Haeberlin, whose work Erna Gunther edited.--Radh (talk) 10:21, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Herman Haeberlin 
Talk:Kiryat HaYovel

message: The neighborhood is called Kiryat HaYovel.--Gilabrand 14:17, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  name of this article 

message: Oy vey, I have messed up all the references. Could someone put them in properly? They are all out of order...Thanks--Gilabrand 14:25, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Hi Derwig, I see you changed everything to Golem - may I ask what your source is? Some municipal site? Nobody has ever called it that in all the years of its existence. It is always called the Mifletzet, the park is Gan Hamifleztet, even if there's a sign calling in Rabinovich park (if you asked anyone where that was, they'd give you a blank stare LOL. --Gilabrand 13:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  golem 
Talk:Prime Minister of Rhodesia

message: There has never been “vandalism” by me. The revert actions by User:PaddyMatthews could rather be considered as that. So far, what was added has better academic sources and references than most of all the pages about Rhodesia. The changes are not based on a website but a long list of scientific literature. I will not “fight” with people who just check one or two sources out of dozens. I’m a scientist without the desire to continue the Rhodesian bush wars here. Either the Wikipedia community can accept that someone contributes to the best of his knowledge, or not. That’s all from my side. Keep, delete, do what you like. Facts remain facts with or without Wikipedia. University Professor for History (talk) 09:21, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Vandalism”/reverts 
Talk:Kingdom of Kartli-Kakheti

message: I don't think this is a correct description of the event taking into account Giorgi XII's petition for mediatization. A changed the article somewhat. Also, the description of Paul I as "liberal", and giving that as the reason for his assassination, is incorrect. I deleted that line. Please, feel free to respond. Gaidash
:The 1783 Treaty of Georgievsk was clear: changes in the relations between Russia & Georgia, and between the Romanov emperor & the Georgian king had to be mutual. George XII didn't declare himself mediatized -- rather, he made an offer to Russia to accept mediatization on the specific condition that his dynasty would continue to reign over Georgia within the Russian Empire. Since that condition was (initially accepted, but finally) ignored by both Paul I and Alexander I, and the annexation took place without any mutual agreement to change the terms of the treaty, "unilateral annexation" is what occurred. I have changed the article accordingly. History must decide whether or not the annexation was warranted. FactStraight (talk) 17:53, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unilateral annexation" 

message: I've corrected some of it, but I don't have access to all the sources, and I hope I am not changing the true meaning of the content. This article either has been edited by a non-native English speaker, or gone through a bad online-translator job. HammerFilmFan (talk) 12:16, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article's English/grammar needs work
Talk:HMCS Winnipeg (FFH 338)

message: HMCS Winnipeg
Laid down	20 March 1993
Launched	5 December 1994
Commissioned	23 June 1995
Honours and awards Atlantic 1943–45, Arabian Sea[1]
Erm?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.54.67.3 (talk) 15:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1943-45 honours are from the previous HMCS Winnipeg, an Algerine class Minesweeper. Honours follow the name of the unit, therefore the current HMCS Winnipeg is recognized for honours from WW2. Wyattr55123 (talk) 02:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong dates; 1943 for a 1995 ship? 

message: According to the New Strait Times here here, Winnipeg visited Penang, while Regina and Ottawa visited Port Klang. Llammakey (talk) 17:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Penang
Talk:List of games based on Conan the Barbarian

message: it’s just the demo for a tiny fan made project, and it hasn’t received any updates in five years. 198.163.235.80 (talk) 21:19, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is age of hyboria really noteworthy enough to be on this page?
Talk:Cabo Delgado Province

message: This new map of Mozambique contains the same error, incorrect border of the province of Manica, as the previous one. Also, why a map in Swahili in an English page? Teixant (talk) 22:50, 22 September 2014 
:Hi Milenioscuro, as pointed out above, the new map is incorrect (border of Manica and Tete provinces). Maybe you could use the file in the Portuguese language article, Cabo_Delgado_Province_in_Mozambique_2018.svg, it is correct! The same apply to the maps of the other provinces. Regards, Teixant (talk) 12:27, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of Mozambique 
Talk:Pleiades (arcade game)

message: Confusing statement in the article: "...the cabinet artwork on the game spells it 'Pleiades' a mistake which possibly reflects the fact that there are different spellings of it in the Greek myth." I've always seen the myth, the constellation etc. spelled "Pleiades." It's been a very long time, but wasn't the game (correctly) spelled "Pleiades?" -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 04:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)