Talk:Saskatchewan New Democratic Party

message: I have serious doubts about the validity of this site, particularly in light of this 1999 press release from the Saskatchewan Party.  CJCurrie 20:43, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "Nondp" website

message: The NDP government is now embroiled in a number of scandals including the Murdoch Carriere sexual harassment affair, and a scandal involving the cover-up of theft of caucus and taxpayers funds.
I agree with Greenjoe that this is not sufficiently verified. It comes from a highly partisan source - a hostile political campaigning website - whose portrayal of events might well be biased. What do other sources with a different viewpoint say on the same subject? Tearlach 11:38, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NDP and scandals

message: The NDP government is now embroiled in a number of scandals including the Murdoch Carriere sexual harassment affair, and a scandal involving the cover-up of theft of caucus and taxpayers funds.
I agree with Greenjoe that this is not sufficiently verified. It comes from a highly partisan source - a hostile political campaigning website - whose portrayal of events might well be biased. What do other sources with a different viewpoint say on the same subject? Tearlach 11:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Carriere was really blown out of proportion (see the above thread), but still considered a "scandal" by the SK party. Theft of caucus funds is in the news right now, but not really a government scandal since it has to do with their own caucus (but the papers are all over it and opposition is calling for resignations blah blah ect). Theft of taxpayers funds is news from a year ago I believe from Community Relations department (or something similar) and Env. department, but both were just employees and didn't really have anything to do with the government (except that they were in power at the time, but yelling by opposition blah blah ect again). I would be in favour of a complete ban on external links to all party sites and affiliates just to keep NPOV (the only exception should be on the article about the party to their home page because it's relavant). If you can't find a news source, it's either party propaganda or people don't like how the news source portrays it. (I'll be at WP:EL proposing that now). -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 23:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NDP and scandals

message: :Image:Saskndp.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rational taken care of (I think). -Royalguard11(Talk·Review Me!) 22:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Saskndp.jpg

message: What was the name of the Calgary-born lawyer who worked on this and later had his office just south of the Hotel Sask on Scarth Street? Masalai (talk) 04:39, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 1944 in Regina

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Saskatchewan New Democratic Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110522151715/http://ca.geocities.com/geheimsaskatoon/1933nr.html to http://ca.geocities.com/geheimsaskatoon/1933nr.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The cliche that the Saskatchewan CCF government was the "first socialist government in North America" is often repeated. However, this overlooks the Mexican Revolution and overlooks the  Party of the Mexican Revolution government of Lázaro Cárdenas which among other things nationalized the oil industry and other sectors, instituted land reform, welfare programs, and amended the constitution to require all children to receive a "socialist education" in school. While his successors and the successor party, PRI, moved to the right I don't think it can be seriously doubted that the 1930s government was socialist in nature, certainly as if not more socialist than Douglas's CCF government. Nixon Now (talk) 12:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "first socialist government in North America" 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:54, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: I removed the maintenance template as, to the best of my judgement, the issues it addressed (additional verification and POV dispute) were meritless and went without discussion on the talk page. 
Please correct this if I have done this in error.
FranticPedantic (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Maintenance Template