Talk:Funding of science

message: I am a new editor interested in this topic. I just wanted to flag that this article mentions the Research Quality Plus Approach, and there is an article for creation pending review on this topic. Those interested may wish to review that article, and if/when it is publicly available, this could be strengthened by adding the internal Wikipedia link to it.HPK at DevResearchEval (talk) 14:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Connections to an article pending review on Research Quality Plus

message: Should this say something about social science research? To what extent would that include thinktanks and foundations (especially where not producing peer-reviewed work)? Rd232 08:48, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social Science 

message: "Some HGP researchers claimed Celera's method of genome sequencing "would not work," however that project eventually adopted Celera's method." - Source please. Rd232 19:39, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: RJII 22:46, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source please 

message: The arguments need sources DGG 19:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: recent edits on government & private funding

message: I am very much against merging in Funding body, as there are many types of funding bodies that are not about research.  Two examples are scholarships (non research related) and art grants. John Vandenberg 05:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am also  opposed to the merge. They are two very different sorts of articles, both important. How research is to be funded in general is one topic, and the organizations which fund it is another. (And for VV's reasons as well)DGG 06:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I, too, oppose, a merger. Evolauxia 20:56, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge in "funding body" 

message: I'm going to start a section on the process involved with funding research with grants, i.e., grant proposals, grant writing, grant board reviews, etc.  It is a often shadowy world that needs some good wikipedian description.  Rhetth (talk) 23:28, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good section, but there's no citations.  Looks like Nature journal is private about their journal and doesn't have any direct links, but there's a washington post article regarding what seems to be the same survey.  Can we just tag it on the last sentence?  Here's the article http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/08/AR2005060802385.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.126.200.228 (talk) 00:20, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More work on the research funding process 

message: I'd like to call your attention to Talk:Science policy, where there is discussion on the relationship between that article and this one.  Specifically, there is a proposal to move this article to Funding of science.  Antony–22 (talk/contribs) 05:35, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science policy reorganization 

message: Maybe I'm missing it, but I don't see a definition posted for "ISR&D", the heading of the second coloumn of the chart, I have never heard that term before and I can't find it anywhere in a quick google search.
Presumably it's independent spending on research & development? Or maybe it's I-something Science Research & Development? It's certainly unclear. Does anyone know?
: I came here to say the same thing. WHAT THE FUCK IS IT!? The ref link is dead, and googling has done me no good.~~
I also have no idea what ISR&D is and could not figure it out with a google search. I think the best way to find out would be to find the source of the statistics in the table. Unfortunately, the sources have not been provided. I suggest that the table be removed if the sources are not given soon. Rectipaedia (talk) 03:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISR&D definition? 

message: The List of research councils seems to a be a bit misplaced on this page. I suggest to put it on a separate page and link to it. Peteruetz (talk) 17:20, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of research councils -- should be moved or deleted 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Funding of science. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151216073658/http://www.isf.org.il/English/ to http://www.isf.org.il/english/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:54, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Funding agencies. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  – Arms & Hearts (talk) 22:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Funding agencies" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Funding of science →  – as in lead fgnievinski (talk) 20:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 May 2022 

message: I'm unable to find any mention of declaration of funding laws or requirements.  Declaration of funding should be a primary part of this topic, and it's not even listed as a subtopic.  Any ideas as to the reason? LairdCamelot (talk) 13:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Declaration of Funding 

message: This article does not state its scope: Is the content intended to refer to funding for science globally? In the USA? In China? This needs clarification. RPeel (talk) 12:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  unclear scope