lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:René Char

message: Seems very out of place! Hcethatsme 21:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book review?!? 

message: What sources, research, or corraborating data is being used to support this statement?
Beuchard 11:10, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Among the translators of his hermetic poems??? 

message: I suggest adding a reference to Char's late friendship with Heidegger, who visited him in Provence and described his poems as "a tour de force into the ineffable", as reported in Chapter 23 of Safranski's book. L'omo del batocio (talk) 15:46, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heidegger 

message: By all means! — Robert Greer (talk) 16:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  do it
Talk:Leconte de Lisle

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support Vol de nuit (talk) 21:37, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The text of this article is plainly lifted from Encyclopedia Britannica, Volume 16, page 356.  Something should be done about it.
http://www.google.com/search?q=delisle+%22The+interval+which+is+his+he+accepts%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#q=delisle+%22The+interval+which+is+his+he+accepts%22&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbo=u&tbm=bks&source=og&sa=N&hl=en&tab=wp&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=7775ba42dc1d177f&biw=1152&bih=716
KD Tries Again (talk) 22:02, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:Joyce Mansour

message: Wasn't she born in Alexandria? 84.191.143.23 16:11, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born where? 
Talk:Jim Ned High School

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 21:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Have updated article with new infobox and current information.  Added state titles and state finalists.  Indyjrg1762 (talk) 09:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Updated
Talk:François le Métel de Boisrobert

message: I have removed :File:Boisrobert.jpg from the article, as it was wrongly labeled and does actually shows a different person. However, we have :File:Caen hôtel Malherbe bas-relief Bois-Robert.JPG which is currently used on :fr. It might be used as a replacement. --Túrelio (talk) 07:16, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: image
Talk:Bonnyrigg

message: What are all the tranport routes of BonnyriggMr Eko Let You Live 22:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transport 
Talk:Louise Colet

message: SLIGHTLY BIASED?
I can't think of any positive or even unbiased uses of the word 'gushing'. Can the original author replace its use with something more objective? Is there some word that denotes, or possibly
connotes, a Romantic author (like Ms. Collet perhaps although I've never read her) who displays emotion without shading it with a more discursive vein? Julian Barnes in Flaubert's Parrot
(reading which led me to the Wikipedia article I'm commenting on here) describes her as 'a pest'. This article seems to present a similar opinion. It just seems Wikipedia should be slightly
more balanced. Maybe in a hundred years opinions of her writing will improve?
Just a suggestion.
Ken M Quirici 01:27, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yvan Goll

message: On the cover illustration included on the Surrealist Manifesto entry, he is clearly credited first and at top of the list of contributors as the director: Ivan Goll, the Y as first letter of his name must’ve happened later... so, why can’t the lead to this article where A/K/A in bold lists his née name be amended to reflect this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 52.119.116.170 (talk) 19:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Good catch. Coldcreation (talk) 05:58, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Delapré Abbey

message: Rather than just plopping a banner on the page - how about elucidating some of the issues with the article? This banner is not at all helpful to those who could work on the article. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no particular "issues" with the article that I saw. Start class is merely a designation that the article is not yet of sufficient length or depth of coverage to merit a higher ranking. Also, "plopping down the banner", and, eventually, adding all the articles that the various religion banners have been "plopped onto" to the individual article list for each project, will enable the projects to monitor and develop articles that relate to their subject. Badbilltucker 17:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - that's a bit clearer! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 07:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues

message: Is a place where nuns live an abbey or a nunnery? Or both? Wanderer57 (talk) 18:27, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is either a monastery, a priory or an abbey. "Nunnery" is considered somewhat offensive today. Daniel the Monk (talk) 16:23, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbey or Nunnery 

message: Why the change to put the Eleanor Cross information first? It seems disruptive both in text and format. Daniel the Monk (talk) 16:25, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Reformatting
Talk:Paul-Jean Toulet

message: Hello, I inserted an interwiki link to Fr. WP in the Life section (fantaisist), second paragraph but it doesn't appear...It is in the source but somehow doesn't show....If someone could fix that, I'd appreciate very much. Best. --Pierre et Condat (talk) 08:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki syntax
Talk:Pierre de Bocosel de Chastelard

message: The Mary Queen of Scots page seems to have a fuller (and slightly more plausible) description of events, which I'll cut and paste here. I'm a bit of duffer when it comes to editing wikipedia so didn't want to just change the page - but as the other page seems to have better sources and seems a bit less enamoured of the love story side of things I thought it could inform this entry. I hope this is helpful.
"a French poet at Mary's court, Pierre de Boscosel de Chastelard, was apparently besotted with Mary.[79] In early 1563, he was discovered during a security search hidden underneath her bed, apparently planning to surprise her when she was alone and declare his love for her. Mary was horrified and banished him from Scotland. He ignored the edict. Two days later, he forced his way into her chamber as she was about to disrobe. She reacted with fury and fear. When Moray rushed into the room after hearing her cries for help, she shouted, "Thrust your dagger into the villain!" Moray refused, as Chastelard was already under restraint. Chastelard was tried for treason and beheaded.[80] Maitland claimed that Chastelard's ardour was feigned and that he was part of a Huguenot plot to discredit Mary by tarnishing her reputation.[81]"
The citations are;
79 is Guy, John (2004). "My Heart is my Own": The Life of Mary Queen of Scots. London, England: Fourth Estate. ISBN 978-1-84115-753-5.  p. 178 and Weir, Alison (2008) [2003]. Mary, Queen of Scots and the Murder of Lord Darnley. London, England: Random House. ISBN 978-0-09-952707-7. p.44
80 is  Weir 2008, p. 45
81 is Weir 2008, pp. 45–46 and Fraser, Antonia (1994) [1969]. Mary Queen of Scots. London, England: Weidenfeld and Nicolson. ISBN 978-0-297-17773-9. p. 206
Jim 31.111.103.200 (talk) 18:42, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen of Scots page has sourced information
Talk:Gilbertine Order

message: I contributed the section on the Oblates of Saint Gilbert - it would be difficult to cite any independent source, as the modern day Gilbertines have no written work other than their Rule and Daily Office, of which I compiled the present longer version in about 2002. Similarly the Gilbertine Order of Brazil, although they do have a website referenced in the article - Rev. Deacon Mel Harwood, Oblate of St. Gilbert.89.168.163.102 (talk) 22:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Benoît de Sainte-Maure

message: I've removed the birthdate from the article as it is unfeasible given the generally agreed composition date of the Roman. Should the year of death be removed too? --Peter cohen 01:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: 'The standard edition (of the Chronique) is by Carin Fahlin'. Interesting. I've always worked from the Francisque Michel edition, which is cited by Frédéric Godefroy in the Dictionnaire de l’ancienne langue. However, of course, Fahlin's edition came more than 50 years after Godefroy's death, so he couldn't have worked from that one. Renard Migrant (talk) 15:18, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The standard edition is by Carin Fahlin 

message: Die en auant que dire en deit:
I'ai dit por Maistre Beneeit
Qui cest[e] oure a dire a emprise,
Com li reis l'a desour li mise.
That is (roughly)
Disons d’abord qu’on doit dire
Je l’ai dit pour Maître Benoît
Qui a entrepris cet œuvre
Comme le roi l’a mis sur lui
And in English (again, roughly)
Let us say first of all that we must say
I've said for Master Benoît
Who has undertaken this work
As the king as put upon him
Renard Migrant (talk) 21:00, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman de Rou
Talk:Léon Gaumont

message: The citation tag has been up for over a week for the founding of Gaumont Films, with no response from any editors. The inclusion "Their business entity, called L. Gaumont et Cie, has survived in one form or another to become the world's oldest surviving film company extant [citation needed]" was omitted until verification. When proper verification from other verifiable sources are included, I will he happy to reverse this. 
Cheers!
--Roger the red 21:37, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Founding of Company
Talk:Guillaume de Salluste Du Bartas

message: Given that his title was Seigneur du Bartas (Lord of Bartas) the 'du should not be capitalised as it simply means 'of'. Brittannica and other sources use the same de-capitalised form. I propose moving the page to reflect that. Ecrm87 (talk) 20:43, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Guillaume de Salluste du Bartas
Talk:Honda CB350F

message: There are the bones of a decent little stub here, but it needs work from an encyclopedic minded enthusiast.LessHeard vanU 21:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Just because there is an article that can be sourced, doesn't mean it's true. At the time, there has been many other smaller capacity multi-cylinder motorcycless in mass production. Oldest I can think of is Czech Jawa 350/354, an 344 cc twin. Even Honda CB350 twin was 326 cc only, and already 4 years in the production.
31.179.27.138 (talk) 11:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to provide a reliable source for your assertion. You do understand that if we just go by some random opinions, this would stop being a encyclopedia and become just a forum.-72bikers (talk) 23:11, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Claim
Talk:Victor Segalen

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Cattus 01:16, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:SOA governance

message: The SOA Governance: Reengineering IT Governance (Zap Think Article) states the following: “SOA governance is IT governance in the context of SOA, rather than governance of SOA.”  It might be worth making a similar statement in the Wikipedia entry.
--BrianSHayes 21:47, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Hi,
sorry but that is the worst article on a governance topic I have ever seen. The content is nonsense and does not have to do anything with governance. Governance is NOT managing (not in IT governance or Corporate governance). Governance is about who makes what decisions and the governance mechanisms. Quoting b***sh** from consulting companies without thinking about the quote is very very dangerous and the probability that you quote something wrong is very high (like in this case). I have to acknowledge that there is not much academic stuff about this topic yet, but if you want to write something about it you should start thinking about what governance is and not uoting nonsense.
"Monitoring SOA performance is important because of the composition of services – one service may forward tasks to several other services." - Not Soa Governance relevant. Relevant for Soa Governance is monitoring and assessing the governance, its mechanisms, structures and governance processes.
The same argument for every paragraph. This article describes SOA Management but not SOA Governance. Please change the article or I put it on the list for potential deletion (because in this article every sentence is wrong). RememberSoa 09:00, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst Article on a Governance Topic
Talk:Léon Bloy

message: There is not the least source for all this claims. He maybe was really a fanatic but this whole article just tells how moody this man was. There is nothing about his life or his work. -- CecilK 00:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: list of made "enemies" changed to include only those sourced by the referenced article. If the other names to be re-entered, there should be documentation supporting the claim.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.10.39.191 (talk) 19:36, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  neutrality
Talk:Henri Thomas

message: I just want to  inform you I built  a site  this   
http://henrithomas.pbwiki.com
It shall be nice to write this information on your page about HT
Thank you
Patrice Bougon  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.170.211.219 (talk) 17:18, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pierre Reverdy

message: I've been working on the Reverdy bio, inserting section headings, re-organizing the text into appropriate sections for continuity, inserting links to other Wiki pages; also added info box. I plan to continue with this project, enhancing/expanding the information. Betempte (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits  
Talk:Conon de Béthune

message: Conon’s father was hereditary Advocatus (avoué in French or Vogt in German) of the Abbey of St Vaast. The original role of an Advocatus was to perform duties barred to monks, because they risked bloodshed. Typically, this would be to judge capital crimes on abbey lands and to lead the abbey tenants into war. In practice, he and his dependants would often be lay protectors of the abbey and its estate.
86.150.54.166 17:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for noting this misspelling. Andrew Dalby 18:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mousse

message: Salmon Mousse could, indeed, be referring to salmonella and chocolate mousse. However, it could just as easily refer to actual salmon mousse... Dubious reference.81.83.80.223 (talk) 18:56, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Monty Python Reference

message: I appreciate that sources are required, but removing content doesn't seem constructive.  Why not look for sources or add citation required tags, or add it to the list of articles that require sources so that someone else can do it? In particular, the content provided in the article is borderline common knowledge. If the article was controversial or even arguable, I could understand removing the information, but it isn't.  75.84.186.29 (talk) 03:58, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Before I removed the material, the article had been tagged since May 2011 as lacking any sources. Please stop reinserting the material without a reliable source.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:08, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly, so might I ask why you only chose to remove certain information on the basis of "inadequate sources" when in fact none of the article was backed up by a reliable source? So far, it seems fairly biased to remove this information over the rest. Further more, you completely avoided responding to many of the points suggested above, such as adding a citation required tag, doing some research yourself, and the fact that this information is essentially common knowlegde. Deleting large chunks of information from articles is not constructive. --121.45.48.78 (talk) 13:18, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

text: I have removed the only piece of questionable information from this article (the history of mousse in French, American and British cuisine). The rest of the information is confirmed by the source provided. --121.45.48.78 (talk) 13:23, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  --Article Truncation--
Talk:Judith Gautier

message: I removed the following uncited opinion from the lead:
:(This is a stitch, so I will leave it in. Gautier did indeed collaborate with Loti on La fille du ciel, but long distance. She most certainly never married Loti, which was certainly to her benefit. Loti was married from 1886 to his death in 1923 to Blanche de la Ferrière, and it was not a happy marriage. Blanche finally gave up on it and moved back to her home town in 1908, though she never bothered to divorce Loti.)
— btphelps (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Un-cited opinion 

message: in Judith Thurman's biography of Colette, Secrets of the Flesh, she says that Judith Gautier 'took a female lover.' Is that mentioned in any bio of her? If yes, she ought to have it added and have a a bisexual category. 94.197.172.59 (talk) 16:13, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  she was bisexual
Talk:Oxford University Police

message: I called for this article to be deleted under the "prod" process because it has no verified sources. However on reflection I will go back and remove the prod tag and call for it to be merged to Proctor. I was at Oxford for 6 years and never heard of them even though I had a College disciplinary position for 2 years. Google does report that they had been disbanded in 2003 as the article states but I did not find information for the other statements. I would also add that an organisation that no longer exists and does not seem to be widely known even in Oxford is not notable. The article Proctor has a section on the Oxford University Proctors that is tagged as needing updating and seems to be taken from the Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition, a publication now in the public domain. That section should be updated and the information on the Police should be merged there. It is quite out of balance for WP to have a separate article on the Police and no up to date information on the Proctors. 
Debate on the merge should be at Talk:Proctor, so I will copy the above there. --Bduke 21:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to [[Proctor]]
Talk:Laurent Tailhade

message: Ought this article to mention his influence on Wilfred Owen? It is interesting. Mhmaudling
:Not interesting enough for the article on Owen to mention Tailhade it seems. Emeraude (talk) 00:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence on Owen 

message: The claim by Tailhade that Edgar Allen Poe was a user of absinthe was edited out by User:Midnightdreary with the comment: "Not sure I read this right but it implies Poe drank absinthe, which is untrue." Poe almost certainly did drink Paris's most fashionable drink, but true or not, Tailhade said that he did and this is what is relevant here. The actual quote is available from the French Wikisorce here, the relevant passage being: "La morphine compte sous ses étendards moins de poètes que l’alcool. À peine Édouard Dubus et Stanislas de Guaita, lorsque la « Muse verte » s’enorgueillit de Verlaine, de Musset, d’Edgar Poe et de tant d’illustres envoûtés." Emeraude (talk) 16:29, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't see this before... Nevertheless, Poe was not an absinthe drinker; in the Poe world, there is no argument of this fact. If this is what Tailhade believed, it should be noted in the text that it is so, but that it was not true. --Midnightdreary (talk) 23:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Poe
Talk:Matthew of Vendôme

message: What if any is the relation between the author and the Matthew of Vendóme, Abbot of St Denis, who was an adviser to Louis IX in the 13thC?[J. B. Bury, Cambridge Medieval History (1929) VOL VI p. 333-4]
Are they the same man, or father/son, or what? Jacobisq (talk) 10:24, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Fr Wiki [Mathieu de Vendôme] they are the same person, d 1286, in which case he is a poet of the 13thC, not 12th C, as we have it. Input, anyone? Jacobisq (talk) 10:55, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Identity/date
Template talk:Russian launch systems

message: The name of this template is a contradiction in terms. The term "launch vehicle" refers primarily to an American rocket, and whilst several other countries have adopted this term (particularly India), Russia still uses the term "Carrier rocket". The only exception to this that I am aware of is ISC Kosmatros. Therefore, the template should be renamed to reflect something that actually exists. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 21:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

message: This template is still named as Russian but contains Ukrainian launch systems also (even if origin is USSR). Can it be renamed as "Former Soviet states Launch Systems" OR "Soviet, Russian and Ukrainian Launch Systems"? Or something similar?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hammer5000 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming of the Template
Talk:Guibert of Nogent

message: This page, IMO, should redirect from a search for "William" of Nogent. Terry J. Carter (talk) 04:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Adam Bishop (talk) 06:51, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

text: That would be a Guillaume de Nogent. The Anglo-Norman name would be Gilbert of Nogent. Is Guillaume de Nogaret lurking just outside consciousness here? --Wetman (talk) 08:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  William/Guibert 

message: See, e.g.,
* This treatment ("A First-Generation Anselmian, Guibert of Nogent") by Jaroslav Pelikan
 — LlywelynII 02:25, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for article expansion
Talk:Harpeth River

message: Here is a link to an EPA assessment of the pollution, identifying the battery smelting as the source, but I don't know how to add a citation, and cannot find any info on how to insert a citation.  Sorry, I was born before 1990.  
http://www.epa.gov/waters/tmdldocs/TN_9382p1_1.pdf
97.126.115.244 (talk) 02:24, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for pollution 

message: I removed an unsourced section claiming that the "logical" derivation of the name "Harpeth" was the name of a French explorer and mapmaker called "Bernard de la Harpe." Presumably that's a reference to Jean-Baptiste Bénard de la Harpe. There is no evidence that De la Harpe ever came within several hundred miles of the Harpeth watershed. — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 18:44, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed speculative name origin