lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:FIGlet

message: I saw the notice up on the main part of this article so I figured I'd leave a comment. I'd say FIGlet definitely deserves an article on wikipedia. Doing a Google search on that word alone brings up over 100,000 results. It's probably the most notable ASCII Art app there is (even more so than JavE, which also has its own article) - Patorjk (talk) 19:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also note that JavE's website includes a section devoted to FIGlet fonts, although I think banner is still probably the most notable in class. --Belg4mit (talk) 03:15, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: General Notability Guideline

message: Figlet → FIGlet – According to the FIGfont Version 2 FIGfont and FIGdriver Standard the term FIGlet shall be written with capitalized "FIG".
===Survey===
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support
FIGlet is indeed "officially" written this way.
Ianchai (talk) 00:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Add any additional comments
===Result: done===
Clear case. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 20:57, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support
FIGlet is indeed "officially" written this way.
Ianchai (talk) 00:43, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Clear case. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 20:57, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Result: done

message: The description of the -k option in the behavior section is self-contradictory;kerning is exactly the opposite of printing each letter of the message individually. I myself am not sure what the actual behavior of FIGlet is, but it someone should fix this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.157.27.86 (talk) 10:40, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with -k option description 

message: Only to be known: now it exists the Category:Screenshots of Figlet in Commons, useful for the sister project links template. Have a nice day! --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 13:13, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons
Talk:Holy Trinity College, Hong Kong

message: I have just removed the lyrics to the school song from the article as a suspected copyright violation. If this is to be reinserted, it should be accompanied by verifiable information as to its authorship (and copyright status). -- Ohconfucius ping / poke 05:53, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  School song
Talk:Good Hope School

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.ghs.edu.hk/ghs_s.html and http://www.goodhopesingers.org. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  /wiae /tlk 14:31, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:United Christian College (Kowloon East)

message: Hello all, and thank you for contributing to this school site. I'm part of the Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment team, and, I'm reviewing this page. I'm currently giving it a grade of Stub on the Wikipedia 1.0 Assessment Scale and an importance of Low on this importance scale.
My reasoning is as follows: This article is unreferenced and biased. It needs to be expanded Adam McCormick 05:55, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Assessment|Assessment]] as of March 2007
Talk:Christ College (University of Tasmania)

message: more alumni? Victuallers 15:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

message: The honours college at Valparaiso University is called Christ College, maybe it should get a note (well do it then) Victuallers 15:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Christ College, Valparaiso
Talk:Slavník dynasty

message: In fact it's not without doubts that Saint Adalbert relics are still in Greizno today, here what is written in the wikipage about Sain Adalbert: 
'It is said that in 1039 Bohemian duke Bretislav I retrieved the bones of Saint Adalbert from Gniezno and moved them to Prague. According to another version, he took only part of the bones, while the rest of St. Adalbert's relics (including the skull) were hidden by the Poles (according to Roczniki Polskie) and found in 1127. In 1928, one of the arms of St. Adlbert, which Bolesław I had given to Otto III in the year 1000, was added to the bones preserved in Gniezno. Today Saint Adalbert has two graves, and which bones are authentic is still not clear. For example, the saint has two skulls - one in Prague, a second in Gniezno (stolen in 1923).'
For sure Czech people think that at least part of the relics are in Saint Vitus cathedral since the XI century.
--Plch 16:15, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saint Adalbert's relics location?
Talk:Levon Ter-Petrossian

message: Reverted remoaval of the section and added a fact tag instead. --VartanM (talk) 21:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed unofficial fan site. VartanM (talk) 01:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of a section

message: The following section has been removed from the main article on ground of OR.  As soon as the relevant sources are found, it should be replaced:
(Section Title: "Personal Wealth")
In addition to a government pension that amounts to about $5,000 USD a month and a large mansion overlooking Yerevan, Ter Petrossian's wealth is estimated to be several hundred million USD. With his sale of Armentel in the 1990s, Ter Petrossian received a profit of about $200 million USD. Through several front men (such as "Grzo" who owns the SIL Group) Ter Petrossian continues to own much private equity and control over businesses and real estate in Armenia.
Serouj (talk) 21:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal Wealth of LTP

message: once again: pls do not add unsourced extrem. controversional material to a BLP. We have no serious sources on "Oil" story. Andranikpasha (talk) 14:06, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  oil 

message: 517design, please avoid edit-warring and instead address issues here:
#We have a reliable source (RFE/RL) saying that Ter Petrossian was placed under house arrest on March 1.  See here.
#There were 2 shops which were looted: the shoe store and the grocery store.  The reference you provide does not say that "about 20 shops were burned."  That's impossible, because there are no 20 shops there.  Here is a reliable source (ArmeniaNow) that corroborates that ONLY two stores were looted.
Thanks. Serouj (talk) 17:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  House arrest and clashes
Talk:Plume tectonics

message: plume tectonics is the new theory of Mantle plumes dynamics.the theory contain plate tectonics but not contained by plate tectonics. the theory expalain Mantle plumes influence plate moving.Siyajkak 16:19, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

message: This topic seems to represent very much a minority view.  The presentation here suggests that it is a currently active tectonic mechanism.  But what little information I can find suggests that it is proposed only for the early stages of earth formation.
At the very least, this "only early stages" aspect should be made clear at the start of the article.  Additionally, if it really is considered a topic of currently active tectonics, then this needs to be very well reliably sourced.
Feline Hymnic (talk) 12:17, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks for taking this on. Feline Hymnic (talk) 18:09, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:Administrative divisions of Armenia

message: According to http://www.statoids.com/uam.html the provinces are not called marz, but "gavaṙ", the city is "kaghak". But googling seems to confirm marz. TopoCode (talk) 21:32, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: In quoting populations figures, as you do in the table, please indicate in the column heading to which year the figures relate. Clearly, populations change every year (in fact, every day, but no matter) so it is important to see how up-to-date the quoted statistics are. Rif Winfield (talk) 08:18, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please date population figures
Talk:Tung Wah Group of Hospitals Li Ka Shing College

message: Li Ka Shing College put a lot of emphrasis on Learning English.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by My Champions (talk • contribs) 15:48, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promoting English Learning
Talk:Ararat Province

message: According to the 2001 Armenian census, we're missing Kakavaberd from our list of municipalities in Ararat. Kaldari (talk) 22:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Kakavaberd is not an independent municipality, it's part of Bardzrashen according to the census. And it has population 0. Same for Tairov (in Armavir), that's part of Parakar. Markussep Talk 23:43, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing village 

message: How come the flag of this province links to the flag of the Argentinian province of Entre Ríos? I can't seem to find any quick confirmation that the flag is identical.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.110.93.113 (talk) 06:45, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag
Talk:Kotayk Province

message: According to the 2001 Armenian census, the villages of Korchlu and Punik are missing from the list in this article. Kaldari (talk) 23:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing villages 
Talk:Lori Province

message: According to the 2001 Armenian census, the following villages are missing from the list in this article:
*Akhtala (village) (not to be confused with the town of Akhtala)
*Akner 
*Amoj
*Arjut kayaranin kits 
*Armanis 
*Aroghjaranin kits 
*Bendik 
*Getavan
*Gogavan 
*Gulludara 
*Haydarli 
*Kilisa 
*Kober kayarani 
*Kruglaya Shishka 
*Noramut 
*Pambak kayaranin kits 
*Poqr Ayrum
Kaldari (talk) 23:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing villages 

message: "the province was under Georgian political control for several centuries. Visit the area and you'll find dozens of Georgian inscriptions there"
This article is about the province of the Republic of Armenia, where Armenia is the sole official language. See Samtskhe-Javakheti. Samtskhe-Javakheti is a province of Georgia. Georgian is the sole official language of the country therefore the Armenian name is not included in the lead, even though the majority of its population is Armenian.   --Երևանցի talk  04:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What about Javakheti? Should we also remove the Armenian name from that article? --KoberTalk 04:30, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Javakheti is a historic region and not a modern province. And I'm in full support of having the Georgian name of Gugark in the lead. --Երևանցի talk  04:33, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. Would agree to have a Georgian name in the History of the Lori Province article?--KoberTalk 05:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Why not just expand this article like Syunik and include the Georgian name in the history section?  --Երևանցի talk  21:51, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's give it a try. I'm currently in the process of gathering and reconciling the sources. --KoberTalk 17:56, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  No problem. I'll try to find reliable source as well.  --Երևանցի talk  18:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

text:  OK. I took the initiative and created the history section. Right now it briefly summarizes the history of Lori. Please add anything that you find important.  --Երևանցի talk  23:55, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Georgian name  
Talk:Lai King Catholic Secondary School

message: At the end of this article, it is mentioned that students at this school see the principal's behaviour as making the school a famous school shop. I think this statement is not only too subjective. It is also too trivial and has not use in making people more familiar with this school. Nxn 0405 chl 10:47, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:Po Leung Kuk Lo Kit Sing (1983) College

message: Who be sure that this accident happened in our school?--Fongyun (talk) 14:09, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: About the accident
Talk:S. C. Gaw Memorial College

message: This school is not notable. This is the same with many of the schools under the TWGH banner. However, the TWGH is well known in HK to be involved in the provision of education. It is therefore proposed to create an article in the namespace Schools founded by the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals, to which this article will be moved. This article already has a write-up of the TWGH Chow Yin Sum Primary School and Wong See Sum Primary School. In time, there could be split into Primary schools founded by the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals and Secondary schools founded by the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals. Ohconfucius 09:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally accredited colleges are notable, so I would take exception to your statement that it is not notable. If you wish to merge and redirect the content into a more comprehensive article, I have no objection to that. But your proposed name seems to actually be a split from the main Tung Wah Group of Hospitals article, so would a merge there be more appropriate? Actually if this article can be expanded, then leaving it here probably makes the most sense. Dhaluza 11:39, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed page move
Talk:Oared vessel tactics

message: A fine start, but a bit short. The introduction also needs some work; rather than identifying the article ("this is about naval tactics in the period...") it should provide an introduction to the subject ("During such-and-such period, designated the Age of Galleys by such-and-such historian, naval tactics were dominated by X concepts....") LordAmeth 21:47, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment

message: I've been working on galley for quite a while, which has led to a lot of reading about galley tactics. I've become quite skeptical to the notion of a cohesive "Age of Galleys" (especially when capitalized). We're talking about over 2,000 years of history here. Though there was in a sense less tactical and technological development during this time compared to the early modern period, but it doesn't seem reasonable to bunch it all together.
The article seems to be based on the 1911 edition of Encyclopedia Britannica, but military history has evolved quite a bit since then. Are there any recent sources that actually support the idea of a 2,000-year-long period of the history of naval tactics?
Peter Isotalo 19:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable definition of a historical period 

message: Article Military tactics in Ancient Greece, despite its title, is mostly about naval tactics; perhaps those paragraphs belong here. The article Ancient Greek warfare is mostly about land warfare. There is also an Athenian navy section floating around. Perhaps the contents of these articles could be coordinated and maybe they should see also each other. When we talk about "Greek naval tactics" to what degree are we really talking about the Athenian navy? Vagabond nanoda (talk) 19:11, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parallel Articles
Talk:Naval tactics in the Age of Steam

message: A long, detailed article, with an introduction that's right on track. However, the article overall feels a bit short, probably due to the excessive sectioning. By removing sub-sub-headers, the sections might look more meaty. Also, I'm curious as to the definition of the "Age of Steam". What powered ships in the WWII period? Not nuclear, of course, but.... these are so different from 19th century steam engines... Well, I'm no expert on modern military history nor on naval subjects, so I leave it to you. LordAmeth 21:55, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment

message: In the "Further reading" section, a work by Thomas Allnut Brassey, the future 2nd Earl Brassey, is listed. The work is supposedly from 1875 – when the author was 12.
Is this really correct?
HandsomeFella (talk) 15:11, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very young author
Talk:Republic of Serbian Krajina Government-in-exile

message: What is the relevance of this article? Where, outside Wikipedia and maybe the corridors of some Serbian political parties, does Serbian Krajina in-exile existence matters? What is the encyclopedical value of this article? This so-called government in-exile si not even cited by B92 or any major Serbian news agencies as far as I know.
This seem to me just another disinformative propaganda piece. RSK, the "government" that only exists in Wikipedia?--187.37.63.201 (talk) 11:59, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the propaganda of a few Serb extremists.  It's a shame that Wikipedia has become a platform for such people and that such articles are allowed to stand.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.236.177.82 (talk) 21:47, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is a joke
Talk:Jonathan Williams (engineer)

message: While the Congressional Bio gives William's Year of Birth as 1750, his tombstone reads 1751. I believe we should go with that. Michael David 16:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Jonathan Williams wrote a book: Legions of Satan, published in 1789.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.60.14.111 (talk) 23:58, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Books author 
Talk:History of measurement/Archive 8

message: It is improper to remove dispute tags save by Wikipedia:consensus. They are claims of the existence of a dispute, right or wrong; they are not marks of error. 
Consensus can be obtaineed in two ways: convincing the doubter he's wrong, or forming a consensus against him. Dispute resolution is mostly intended to focus more eyes on the problem, and so isolate a lone dissenter. Septentrionalis 02:39, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Consensus

message: This is just a house cleaning report.  The sections titled "Typographical units" and "Units of Mass" were duplicated at the bottom of the article.  I removed the bottom two and left the ones at the top of the subject intact.  I also added a "see also" reference to the article on "Metrology"--David.c.h 16:39, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Redundant Sections
Talk:Aram I

message: Who consecrated him to the episcopate?
--Jaques O. Carvalho ☜ 23:04, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who consecrated him to the episcopate? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.armenianorthodoxchurch.org/old-archives/htdocs/v01/doc/main.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:56, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problem removed
Talk:Karekin II

message: Who consecrated him to the episcopate?
--Jaques O. Carvalho ☜ 22:55, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who consecrated him to the episcopate? 

message: Since Garegin II, the incumbent Catholicos in Etchmiadzin is from  Voskehat, Armenia, thus the proper transliteration of the name must be according to Eastern Armenian transliteration Garegin  II rather than the Western Armenian Karekin II. 
This is in great difference to Karekin I before him (effectively Karekin II of Cilicia later Karekin I of Etchmiadzin). This Catholicos (Karekin I) who was born in the Middle East (in Kessab Syria actually) and is a Western Armenian making his name pronounced Karekin according to Western Armenian transliteration. He used Karekin exclusively when he was in Antelias so I presume his name as Karekin can stay. So I would say Karekin I (in case of the previous Catholicos), but Garegin II in case of the present catholicos.
Incidentally I support keeping the pronunciations of contemporary Armenian names according to the individuals' origin and applying of Eastern Armenian pronunciations for people originating from Armenia and former Soviet Union, and Western Armenian pronunciations and conventions for people from Ottoman Empire and Armenians of the Diaspora. werldwayd (talk) 06:11, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Karekin II or Garegin II?

message: There seems to be quite a bit of criticism of Karekin II from Armenians. See: http://www.keghart.com/Editorial-Catholicos
Since he is a public leader, it would be good to incorporate controversies and objections to his authority into this article. 74.141.69.51 (talk) 23:05, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section 

message: There is no corroborating evidence of this change in his role.  Please fix it ArmenChakmakjian (talk) 16:49, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This listing was edited 8 hours ago to say he was “former” head of the armenian church