lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wrigley Building

message: If anyone wants to do this, please take a photograph of the entrance to the British Consulate on the 13th floor of the Wrigley Building. The photo would be for this article. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photography request: British consulate in the Wrigley Building

message: I get the foreign consulates being listed as they are government related. But if we start adding to the list with every tenant, it starts to look like a directory page for the building's management company. Any thoughts on the matter?Ryecatcher773 (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Tenant list?

message: I am looking for opinions regarding the infobox image. I propose changing the existing photograph to this photograph, which is extracted from a quality and featured image. As a featured image, the photograph is "considered one of the finest images" on Commons. The existing infobox image demonstrates poor composition, shows the building undergoing maintenance, and has significant perspective distortion. It also fails to capture the building's two tower nature. Thoughts? Filetime (talk) 20:47, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for starting a conversation.  Being from Chicago, I can assure you that the usual and iconic image presented of the Wrigley building is from the front, facing the Michigan Avenue bridge and viewed across the river.  This is a standard view as seen in newspapers, magazines, and history books that I grew up with.  At night, the front of the two towers are illuminated, and that is the huge presence the building makes as one comes up the river, drives down Wacker, or goes north on Michigan out of the Loop.  The side-view indeed shows the two towers and other details, but is not as well known, even in Chicago, and that side is pretty dark at night—not as majestic a presence as the front-view.  That picture could certainly be used in the gallery, but not as the Lede photo.  Pictures of buildings in the lede should be of the front of the building, not the side.  Regards, GenQuest "scribble" 01:52, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image
Talk:Epidemiological transition

message: I do not think that the figure provided in the article provides a visual of the epidemiological transition. The image illustrates the demographic transition theory. 
Otherwise, the article is very informative.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.129.248.5 (talk) 19:29, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake

message: The sentence makes sense but the article is very poor, will try and clean it up over the summer. Supposed (talk) 02:18, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  poor 
Talk:Truman College

message: This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new  request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.
Apologies but not sure how to edit the Notes section directly and the following link in the Notes appears to be broken:
1. History of Harry S Truman College
http://www.trumancollege.edu/visitors/history.php
Perhaps it should be?
http://www.ccc.edu/colleges/truman/menu/Pages/History.aspx
Moshekaye (talk) 16:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You are quite right. I have updated the link. Thank you for pointing this out. JohnCD (talk) 15:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

text: Short answer: you don't see them in the "Notes" section, because they are placed in the text at the point they refer to, between  ...  tags, and then a "template"  at the end of the article causes them all to be displayed there, with links back to the text. You can read about it at WP:CITE. This is all made more complicated because there are now two quite different ways to edit articles: the traditional one accessed through the "Edit source" tab, and a new "Visual editor" accessed through the "Edit" tab, which it is hoped will make things easier but which at present is very much a prototype-on-test. More advice on your talk page later today. JohnCD (talk) 17:07, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  404 Error - link #1  
Talk:CBS News Radio

message: Should be merged with CBS Radio.Dogru144 01:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger suggestion

message: http://www.insideradio.com/inside-the-deal-cbs-news-radio-inks-with-distributor-skyview/article_6a1f2580-781f-11e7-9c05-af4e2fba0f01.html. Update CBS Radio News has signed a deal with Skyview Networks and the contract will happen in 2018.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.15.47.45 (talk) 16:56, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: CBS News Radio to Skyview Networks
Template talk:WikiProject Radio

message: When applied to a category talk page, it causes the category talk page to be a member of the category. See for example :Category:Science fiction radio programs contains its own talk page. Tim! 09:33, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been fixed by having the template no longer link back to the talk page's article. --PhantomS 10:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Operation Luna

message: Provided a box, but not an image, since I'm still new enough at this game not to know what's permitted in terms of image copyrights.  Originalylem (talk) 11:55, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've a definite memory that the Chinese moon-goddess Chang'e is one of the enemies.  Can anyone confirm this?  I don't have the book any more. --GwydionM (talk) 21:09, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chang'e 

message: I'd call it supernatual adventure.  Nothing particularly gruesome or bloody happens.  I don't remember any any major positive characters getting killed.--GwydionM (talk) 16:55, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it horror?
Talk:List of CLI languages

message: Since with "Microsoft .NET Languages" - "Microsoft" may refer to both the .NET platform and the languages and .NET is commonly identified with Microsoft a more general title is given to this article. --mfx Q&A 11:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: I would have thought Microsoft's "flagship" .NET language is C#, not VB. Most of the .NET Framework is written in C#, and a majority of the articles on MSDN and so on use C#. I suggest deleting the flagship description from VB, and moving C# to the top of the list of Microsoft languages. I don't think describing any language as "flagship" adds much value, and don't propose to add the word to the description of C#.
Paul Foxworthy 12:50, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed by anon, . Will revert. Sander Säde 12:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flagship? 

message: The information is wrong. VBx is the code name of the upcoming VB version (VB 10), not an own language. True, it will support the DLR but that doesn't make it a separate language from VB. For reference, see http://www.panopticoncentral.net/archive/2007/05/01/20383.aspx
Any reason this should stay nontheless? If not – I'll remove it.--87.77.158.189 (talk) 13:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language VBx? 

message: The Lexico link seems to go to a topic unrelated to programming languages...
75.170.232.147 (talk) 11:58, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. MahangaTalk 18:05, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misc 

message: I would like to add the below bullet to the list of CLI Languages. Please let me know if you see any reason this edit will not be successful and remain on the CLI Languages Wikipedia Page. 
*Synergy DBL .NET: an object oriented CLI compliant implementation of DBL and DIBOL.http://blogs.msdn.com/b/terryclancy/archive/2010/12/07/another-language-for-visual-studio-and-net-synergex-release-synergy-de.aspx
Thank you!
RichardMorris RCP (talk) 21:46, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New CLI Language Proposed
Talk:ABC News Radio

message: The official website for ABC radio is NOT http://www.abcnewsradioonline.com but http://abcradio.com   
The fake news website has been listed on this entry on and off for years but it is important to prevent the official website from being reverted to the fake news website again. 
for proof, the fake news website nevertheles embeds the real and official twitter account for abcradio and the official twitter profile lists abcradio.com as the official website.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Masks98 (talk • contribs) 04:33, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website for ABC News Radio
Talk:Radio Netherlands Worldwide

message: I have removed unnecessary Internal Links on this article.  Kathleen.wright5 15:51, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Unnecessary Internal Links  

message: Has anyone else heard that Radio Netherlands English service will be closing down at the end on June 29.  Full details can be found here   Closure of English Service  kathleen  wright5 (talk) 03:15, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shutdown of Radio Netherlands English service 

message: What is the musical jingle that was Radio Netherland's shortwave "interval signal"?
:It was a chime version of the Eighty Years' War song Merck toch hoe sterck. The info was included in the section of History.--Noble Caraqueño (talk) 06:53, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the musical jingle that was Radio Netherland's shortwave "interval signal"?

message: Important part of these Radio studios during WW II, don't figure here : for ex. transmission Free India, German propaganda directed to the Indian Nation. Indian team came from Berlin. --77.193.167.83 (talk) 08:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Crown Colony of Malacca

message: Working on it, please bear with me. Thanks --Bukhrin 16:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When are you going to continue with the construction? Already near the end of 2015, almost 10 years since  you leave this message in 2006. ~ Muffin Wizard ;) 11:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Under construction
Talk:Boudreaux's Butt Paste

message: "Boudreaux's is not advertised, relying on word of mouth to get to customers."  "In recent years, Boudreaux's Butt Paste has sponsored NASCAR Busch Series car #34"  Isn't this a contradiction?  Taco325i 16:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction
Talk:Complexor

message: shouldn't this page just redirect to attractor? --MarSch 16:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: I have a big problem with the recently added layman's explanation. It is completely incoherent. I'll be removing it if it doesn't improve. --MarSch 09:35, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  layman explanation
Talk:Württemberg

message: The etymology of "Wurt-tem-berg" would be interesting to my family and other WP readers/researchers.  If the city name ended in 'burg' it would mean 'city', but since it ends in 'berg' it means 'mountain'. And, as I recall, 'wurt' means 'word'. So does 'Wurttemberg' come from "Word from the Mountain"? . . . This would be interesting! . . .  Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 16:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: What's the point of bibliography in a disambiguation page? Bertdrunk (talk) 15:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography
Talk:Title 47 CFR Part 15

message: What does the quote actually say, anyway? All I've read was just *about* it.
I think that it is mandatory for all devices to "accept any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation" so that in case of a national crisis like a natural catastrophe of something else like a nuclear attack the government can send out some sort of really powerful crazy warning to more people. Mabey its kinda like when cingular phones get really to speakers and they are ringing they mess with the sound. I also believe that a yeti is living in my basement. LOL ....no but really Part 15 of the FCC Rules.....think about it
This is just another example of a single case of poor use of the English language being propagated extensively. I believe that what should have been written is the following:
This device *must* not cause harmful interference, and 
this device must *sustain* any interference received, including interference that may cause undesired operation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.245.32.2 (talk) 18:11, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: What's the quote?

message: The ISM band article claims that "Part 15 Subpart B contains the rules for unlicensed communication devices".
However, this "Title 47 CFR Part 15" article claims that "Subpart B deals with unintentional radiators --- devices that are not designed to produce radio waves".
Is this a contradiction?
--68.0.124.33 (talk) 15:07, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  unlicensed communication devices 

message: There's no mention of the spectral limits! I think this would be interesting so readers could actually see the signal strength limits used in EMI testing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandon.irwin (talk • contribs) 20:26, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No limits? 

message: I am waiting on Omaha, Ne judge w. Thompson to decide weather or not I can have visits with my daughter who resides in Omaha, NE with her father Stephen P Murray. 
Thank you Alessandra 2601:581:C001:1E00:6C28:3FA8:9C99:7E1C (talk) 10:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alessandra diem
Talk:Gottfried von Bismarck

message: I notice that this article has been tagged for cleanup. I would love to help with that. I was the one who wrote the article, so I would appreciate some guidance here. Can you be specific? What needs to be done to improve the quality?
--Ashley Rovira 16:52, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the format needs improved to come into line with other biographical pages.--Couter-revolutionary 17:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Try looking at the layout of a WP:FA like Frederick_Hamilton-Temple-Blackwood%2C_1st_Marquess_of_Dufferin_and_Ava to see how they are set out and/or wikilinked. Alci12 18:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much. I just combined three of the non-Wikipedia standard sections into a more traditional format (for Wikipedia of course). Do you think it's better? I will keep the Cleanup banner on there unless told that it can be removed. Do you think my references and citations are good? --Ashley Rovira 14:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I have classified this article as a start. It covers Bismarck's life reasonably well. Capitalistroadster 09:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification as start
Talk:Body and Soul

message: I added the Coleman Hawkins's album of 1939 (look at WP:Coleman Hawkins). 217.228.98.122 (talk) 13:50, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:All-news radio

message: The definition of news radio is continuous news programming for the vast majority of the broadcast day (including middays and weekends). Thus, KNX and WBZ would qualify, but KRLD would not qualify since it runs talk during the midday daypart. KNX runs news overnights, which meets the quota (and "Money 101" technically qualifies as "news", although Jim Cramer is decidedly not), while WBZ runs talk overnight but news middays. Calwatch 07:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: All news radio definition
Talk:List of radio formats

message: While visiting NYC recently, I also heard what sounded like a Greek and a Jewish music station?  Are these full-time formats?  Are there other ethnic formats? -- Beland (talk) 22:43, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In past years I would suspect WEVD which gave an hour or two per day to each of these languages and several others.  Nowadays other stations do this but I haven't kept track.  WEVD changed a few years ago and dropped foreign languages.  I know of no monolingual (or nearly monolingual) stations except in English and Spanish.  Jim.henderson (talk) 18:19, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other ethnic groups 

message: We already have many of these formats listed on :Category:Radio formats, so is this technically considered redundant? --Schala ★ 20:47, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we really need this article?
Talk:The Yummy Fur

message: Did the band take their name from Chester Brown's mid-80'sYummy Fur comic book series? Pimlottc (talk) 02:15, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to the comic? 

message: The references need a clean-up. References 1 and 4 are broken. #2 is to a blog.
* "The Yummy Fur". Personnel. Retrieved on February 17 2005.
* "1990s (the band, not the decade)". Obscure Sound blog. Retrieved on September 17 2008.
* The Yummy fur Peel sessions on 'Keeping it Peel', a BBC hosted resource and tribute site for DJ John Peel, retrieved on March 11 2009
* "The Yummy Fur". Albums. Retrieved on February 17 2005.
External links. 1990s is already linked from 1990s page. Guided Missile is broken.
--paperjunk (talk) 15:30, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oudated references/external links 
Talk:Cable radio

message: This article seems mainly concerned with the FM radio service offered by some companies whose primary business is cable television. But in various countries there are/were also cable networks specifically for radio which distributed AM (or even baseband audio) signals to customers over telephone, electricity or dedicated lines. 213.40.114.183 (talk) 13:48, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not just FM

message: The article briefly alludes to cable radio in the USSR but fails to mention the main motivation on the authorities part for establishing such services. Namely the fact that it was far easier to restrict or prevent owners of cable-only (as opposed to conventional broadcast) receivers from listening to "politically undesirable" broadcasts from other countries. There were similar networks established in some cities in Nazi Germany for exactly the same reason. 213.40.114.183 (talk) 13:48, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Bullshit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.31.183.22 (talk) 16:36, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Censorship

message: I would like to propose a merge with the Linjesender article. Any thoughts ? 86.112.91.158 (talk) 15:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest merge
Talk:Riton (musician)

message: The site no longer works. It takes you to a page displaying this (of course it doesn’t display the way it is on the page, but you get the idea):
Don’t let this space go to waste
Make ritontime.com work for you
Flawless on every device
Create your online presence today
Set up your FREE one page website.
Simply activate and add your details
Activate my site
Beautiful design
Or… Let us do it for you!
We’ll design and build you a website you can be proud of
Find out more Stevieb2685 (talk) 06:04, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riton’s website 
Talk:Seattle Seahawks Hall of Famers

message: This page was put up for deletion on the following grounds:
* "We don't need individual pages for Pro Football Hall of Famers of each NFL franchise.  This information should be listed in each NFL Franchise article or in a list of all Pro Football Hall of Famers."
I have several issues with this. First, such an article is certainly within the scope of Wikipedia's policies of both what it is and is not. Having reviewed those policies, I can't find any that the article doesn't conform to. If this is incorrect, please let me know.
Second, the reason given isn't explained. Why don't we need individual pages for Pro Football Hall of Famers of each NFL franchise? With nothing more than the unsupported statement, there's nothing to discuss, save the trivial answer of "I disagree".
Third, the rule is not a good one on the face of it. It could very well be that each individual team page grows to a size that breaking it up this way is exactly what we need.
Fourth, if a change to the page is needed, clearly it would be deleted, but rather merged with the team page.
In conclusion, I reject outright the assertation that "We don't need individual pages for Pro Football Hall of Famers of each NFL franchise". It may very well be true that this particular page is not needed at this particular time, but that's a different argument entirely. If we decide to do something of that nature, merging is the answer, not deletion. --Don Sowell 17:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion discussion
Talk:Capture effect

message: I think the section explaining AM's immunity to the effect needs to be clearer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.230.232.9 (talk) 04:51, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  AM immunity 

message: This article is more than half on AM not having a capture effect.  I somewhat understand the FM capture effect, but came here to remember the effect on S/N ratio for FM signals. Specifically, the S/N ratio after demodulation is much higher than before demodulation, for similar reasons. Or, in other words, the capture effect removes lower amplitude signals as noise. But I forgot the details in terms of S/N. Gah4 (talk) 23:29, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  FM
Talk:Alter Ego (band)

message: Are these by this Alter Ego or a different one? The band's websites don't seem to make any mention of this singleThomashauk (talk) 02:25, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Get the bread/Your Daughter kicked my dog 

message: This album seems to be from a different project named "Alter Ego". A Canadian folk duo rather than a German electronic duo. 2001:4090:A243:8238:AD11:6841:B133:D287 (talk) 23:03, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it --FMSky (talk) 23:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memories from Overseas (1995)
Talk:Non-commercial educational station

message: The concept discussed in this article is within the context of the FCC's definition.  It should come as no great surprise, then, that "[t]he examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view" of a subject which really has no worldwide view.  If there is a need to discuss this within another context, such as that of another nation's laws, then I would suggest that another article be written, and the matter of disambiguation brought up afterwards.  In the meantime, I'm removing the template from this article. -- JeffBillman (talk) 16:33, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worldwide view 

message: Good afternoon my name is Daniel and I'm a pastor in the state of Delaware,  and was wondering if you guys had any channels available 
To broadcast in our estate, if you could pls contact me at 657 900-6895 73.165.224.237 (talk) 18:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avaliable channels
Talk:Sporadic E propagation

message: The E-Skip section of TV and FM DX should be merged into this article. I tried to follow the instructions on the official way to propose this but... they're stupidly complicated and I gave up. Perhaps someone could do it for me.
--Mwongozi (talk) 13:46, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from TV and FM DX 
Talk:The Phantom of Manhattan

message: A cat stepped on the keyboard? 60.254.217.187 13:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was mentioned in Playbill:  http://www.playbill.com/news/article/108816.html 69.86.235.225 (talk) 00:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The cat
Talk:The Selecter

message: I'm not really sure its accurate to claim Noel's version is another selecter. He might claim it, but pretty much everybody is ignoring him. Everybody knows Selecter is Patricia and band. I don't really know what wikipedia's policy on this is, but its a bit against the grain to treat the noel version as some sort of co-equal selecter.  121.45.250.254 (talk) 23:43, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Noel's version is another selecter