lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ephraim Island

message: I've pulled a lot of information out of the top of my head, as I've lived in the area my entire life and frequently trundled around the Island (somewhat illegaly as it was private property) in my past youth. In point, if there is anyone who has better info ... please contribute! Thanks. --AQjosh 11:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Murcian Spanish

message: It's difficult for me to tell if this article is talking about Murcian Spanish in general, or is discussing the specific dialect called Panocho.  I know the two are interrelated.  I will try and find out the specifics.  --Closeapple 11:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't sign properly. The previous paragraf was written by: ObscurO 23:25, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Murcian Spanish vs. Panocho

message: The current translation appears to be a machine translation.  Also, there is a section or two of the Spanish version of this article that hasn't been translated at all.  --Closeapple 11:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation progress

message: Rewritten from pretty horrible translation, and given a copy-edit as per community portal request.  Could do with attention from an expert in Spanish lingustics. Tpth 05:34, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewritten

message: 74.0.147.45 has added some statements about the evolution of the language - interesting stuff, but it could do with some referencing.  Tpth 00:37, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I agree with Franguigo. One thing is the Murcian Spanish. Murcian Spanish is the form of speaking Spanish in Región de Murcia, but it's Spanish (like the defference between American and British English) and it's spoken by all the people living in Región de Murcia, but another different thing is the Murcian language (Llengua Murciana), a language very different form spanish and spoken by few people--Who plays violin 10:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, sir, do you have any reference? The Murcian language is not recognised to be so by any official institution, only by local associations. Akhram (talk) 22:43, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dialect

message: La denominación para el murciano en el ámbito académico viene siendo la de "dialecto murciano" y en el plano oral viene siendo la de "murciano" y / o la de "panocho"(Ver más en GARCÍA SORIANO, JUSTO: Vocabulario del dialecto murciano. 1932. Madrid.). Sin embargo en este artículo se le denomina "español murciano" ("spanish murcian") la cual no es una denominación apropiada, es de uso muy minoritario, artificial y de aplicación moderna, además de estar empapada de gran peso ideológico.
En Wikipedia en español sí aparece la denominación "dialecto murciano".
--83.53.92.11 (talk) 08:50, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: What might be an unusual expression in Spanish might also be the most precise denomination in English. Jotamar (talk) 15:56, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Error en el nombre del artículo

message: people here speak spanish with a local accent.. just like americans speak english with an american accent..cutting letters and silencing som parts of words.the only difference is that murcia is small compared to spain while america is bigger than england. vamo al mercao...i wanna go. 88.21.20.71 (talk) 15:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  murcian language
Talk:Little Martha

message: The article states both that the track was performed solely by Duane Allman, and that he was joined by Betts.  This needs to be made consistent.  The track ounds like a solo to me; who has more expertise or references to settle the point?   Jgm 11:38, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a duet. It's the only Allmans song that Duane solely wrote, which I think is what the article was trying to say. I've clarified the wording.    Wasted Time R 11:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: consistency
Talk:The Girl Guides Association of Bahrain

message: <Content removed>
:Dear Kintetsubuffalo, please do not use talkpages as an advertising page, such acts are against the basic wikipedia guidelines. Rehman(+) 04:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed ad content. Rehman(+) 04:34, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

text: No one was using it as an advertisement, I was putting their own published contact information here. What what accusations you sling. --Chris (クリス • フィッチュ) (talk) 05:08, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Girl Guides Association of Bahrain
Template talk:Branches of biology

message: I think the subfield "taxonomy" should link to alpha taxonomy, not taxonomy. The article "taxonomy" is about classifying things (anything), not the biological meaning of classifying living organisms (which corresponds to the article "alpha taxonomy", as explained by both articles). I just wanted to make sure that everyone is ok with the change before doing it. Thanks, IronChris  |  (talk) 11:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, and then the footer template should be moved from taxonomy to alpha taxonomy. The "taxonomy" article isn't actually about biology (it is in the category classification systems, whereas "alpha taxonomy" is in the category scientific classification). IronChris  |  (talk) 12:05, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'm going ahead with the change as there has been no opposition. Tell me if there's a problem. IronChris  |  (talk) 12:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomy

message: I recently converted this template to the  format, after noting that it was the only one of 15 navboxes on the page Pathology which did not hide itself. One can definitely question the wisdom of placing 15 navboxes on a page (not my doing), but regardless of how many there are, it just looks bad to have some automatically showing (no matter how small they are) and some automatically hidden. Users who would maintain this as an unhidable box (and use somewhat insulting language in their edit summaries) need to be willing to explain why this box is more worthy of eternal sunshine than all the other navboxes created with the standard template. Note that you can use a piped command with this template ("state=uncollapsed") on individual pages to prevent autocollapse.-RustavoTalk/Contribs 22:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template format

message: I have noticed that almost all items in the box are sorted alphabetically, with only a couple of exceptions. Is there any specific reason why these exceptions have been made or is it just a mistake that ought to be corrected? Waltham, The Duke of 16:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No reason, should be fixed. Samsara (talk • contribs) 17:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order?
Talk:Beach Blanket Babylon

message: ----
All text removed due to a copyright violation.  See http://www.beachblanketbabylon.com/What.cfm
*I further altered the text without looking at the original copy from the website to make sure it's no longer a copyvio of any sort. - Mgm|(talk) 11:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mxit

message: To me knowledge they are still running ejabberd as the migration to the new core failed and has been postponed. The article should be updated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.88.118.245 (talk) 16:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: migration did not happen

message: Well... Did any of you know you could use an already created MXit PC Client? I know, awesome, right? LOL. It's almost the same, just the thing is it's not MXit's client.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.17.76.30 (talk) 09:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: MXit

message: This article needs to be completely rewritten, it reads like a user manual instead of a encyclopedia entry. I'm removing the chat room commands and smilies from the article. Jediwannabe 10:07, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite article

message: Someone should edit or remove the Benefits of using MXit section, as it reads like one of the employers of MXit wrote it in the form of advertisement. Except for that, the section as a whole is clearly entirely biased towards the MXit application. --Adriaan90 13:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It mostly compares MXit to SMS, which is not fair, since MXit is an instant messaging application / service and not a direct replacement for SMS. Comparing it to MSN / ICQ would be fairer. MoHaG 11:55, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll get rid of it soon (when I have a chance and when the dust has settled - if indeed that is the case). I do remember there being an "Advert" tag on this article -- someone must have removed it, but there's more work to be done. -- Chris Lester talk 18:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: Is the section about the anonimity of MXit really revelant?  In this way it is no different whatsoever to almost every single chatroom in existence.  Can I remove this then please?
Stuart Steedman 13:30, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous Chatting 

message: I think in the introduction where it says you have to pay for messages is a bit unclear. You only have to pay your service providers data charges. And only pay mxit for messages in their chat rooms.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.35.44.112 (talk) 10:46, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pay on no pay for Mxit 

message: Hi
MXit is stylised with a capital "X" in it. That is, MXit not Mxit. Please could the name and introduction of this article be changed?
Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephnv (talk • contribs) 14:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we have it right. See MOS:TM. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 08:30, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stylisation of "MXit"
Talk:Basal body temperature

message: Let's all work on reaching a consensus for a new infobox to be placed on each individual birth control method's article.  I've created one to start with on the Wikipedia Proposed Infoboxes page, so go check it out and get involved in the process. MamaGeek (Talk/Contrib) 12:14, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Infobox for individual birth control method articles 

message: BBT is used for more than Birth Control.  For instance, athletes use it to monitor their thyroid function and fat burning levels.  Should this be on a separate page or included here?Shu(Talk/Contrib)23:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Uses of BBT

message: Toni Weschler has recently been added to the see-also sections of a group of related articles.  I'm not sure this addition is appropriate; my reasoning is at Talk:Billings ovulation method#See also - Toni Weschler? Lyrl    Talk     C   03:05, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also - Toni Weschler 

message: :There seems to be a rough consensus at Categories for discussion to put this article into a new :Category:Fertility awareness.  I'll leave this notice here for a couple of days, and if there are no objections, go ahead and create the new category. Lyrl    Talk     C   01:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization 

message: This article has been moved to :Category:Fertility tracking as part of a planned deletion of :Category:Periodic abstinence, :Category:Fertility awareness, and :Category:Natural family planning.  Please bring up any concerns at Category talk:Fertility tracking.  If there are no objections within four days, these three categories will be tagged for speedy deletion. Lyrl    Talk     C   22:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category move

message: Please mention some values and some concrete date. T.R. 87.59.78.206 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 11:37, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  But what is the basal body temperature actually supposed to be? 

message: Are there significant differences in basal body temperature between men and women? --Brian Fenton (talk) 15:53, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about men? 

message: I've looked at the review (as well as the plain-language summary that's being cited), and I think we should remove the statement about how much scientific research is needed before people should "adopt or disseminate" a personal practice.  "You shouldn't do this because it hasn't been studied to my satisfaction" is basically the authors' personal opinion, and has no place in the article.  The authors' POV doesn't meet the usual criteria for presenting someone's opinion in a scientific article (e.g., they are neither famous proponents or famous critics of the issue at hand).
I think it would be more pointful to say something like "As high-quality evidence does not exist, it is unknown how well this would work at preventing or achieving a pregnancy".  WhatamIdoing (talk) 16:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cochrane's opinions
Talk:Presbyterian Ladies' College, Melbourne

message: This page sounds like it's been taken straight from the school's Prospectus. I hardly think the "delightful garden setting" of the boarding house needs to be elaborated on, and many of the headings only have a sentence or two of content! How is it that the "Transportation" is included, but the House system isn't? I'll get around to working on the article, but if anyone wants to help out beforehand, that would be great. Note to staff member who probably wrote this article: wikipedia is not an advertising service.  InSurreality 12:18, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias
Talk:Lea's Shield

message: Let's all work on reaching a consensus for a new infobox to be placed on each individual birth control method's article.  I've created one to start with on the Wikipedia Proposed Infoboxes page, so go check it out and get involved in the process. MamaGeek (Talk/Contrib) 12:20, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Infobox for individual birth control method articles 

message: I think that the failure rates don't agree with the bibliography avalaible, wich points more towards 15 %.
I have serious doubts about the failure rates associated with Lea's shield. I've read the FDA Summary of Safety and Effectiveness (http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/pdf/P010043b.pdf) and they talk about 9% and 14% rates (with and without spermicide). In fact, the low indexes I have found are at http://www.contraceptiononline.org/contrareport/article01.cfm?art=210, and they talk about 4 and 6%, but correcting the statistics because of a supposed bias associated with few nulliparous users. Anyway, it seems that till now the data is scarce, so if we choose to say 4% I would add a note about low sample used. 
--213.194.135.44 15:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Failure rates

message: Note discussion at Talk:Birth control#"pregnancy rate" rather than "failure rate" re replacing occurrences of "failure rate" with "pregnancy rate".  I would also like to see the same change on this page.  Please make any comments there.  --Coppertwig 04:02, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  pregnancy rate" rather than "failure rate" 

message: somewhat comical... insert into "his" vagina?  someone should fix this.  129.170.203.62 (talk) 16:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronouns in "Use" section
Talk:Vaginal ring

message: Let's all work on reaching a consensus for a new infobox to be placed on each individual birth control method's article.  I've created one to start with on the Wikipedia Proposed Infoboxes page, so go check it out and get involved in the process. MamaGeek (Talk/Contrib) 12:24, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Infobox for individual birth control method articles 

message: I like the new images, but am concerned about where they have been put.  On my monitor, the "Contents" box is now smushed between the birth control infobox and a picture, and the text of the "Methods of use" section is offset in an odd-looking way.
Any suggestions for moving the images to resolve especially the "Contents" box issue would be welcome. Lyrl    Talk     Contribs   01:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image placement 

message: Some interesting research on the use of vaginal rings for HIV prevention has been appearing over the last year: 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
We should have some coverage on this, either in this article, or elsewhere. -- The Anome (talk) 11:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vaginal ring for HIV prevention 

message: https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm616541.htm
"Schedule is repeated every four weeks for one YEAR (thirteen 28-day menstrual cycles)
Annovera is WASHED and stored in a compact case for the 7 days not in use".
--128.214.78.206 (talk) 11:35, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vaginal Ring for 1 year (13 menstrual cycles, otherwise similar to NuvaRing) will come to USA market at end of 2019 or beginning of 2020
Talk:State racism

message: What is :"...the medieval discourse of "race struggle", invented during the Glorious Revolution and at the end of Louis XIV's reign" ? a discourse on medieval "race struggle" ? is Glorious Revolution confounded with Puritan Revolution ? was the political theory relative to the "natural law of government" (Sir Edward Coke, if that is what is refered to) really foremost a racial debate ? comparable for instance with the Inquisition over the Limpieza de sangre ? Looks like I will have to read history all over again... (Lunarian 12:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern Times ?

message: This is not a fact, give sources. Bumiputra is basically the local person in Malaysia, unlike Chinese or Indian. The Aborigines in Australia are locals too and receive also special privileges from the government. Is Australia a state racism??? Don't think so.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.128.17.143 (talk) 07:02, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bumiputra - state racism???
Talk:South Central Railway zone

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: here and here. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 23:37, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Christopher Holder

message: A descendant of Christopher Holder, Charles Frederick Holder, wrote two books in the early 20th century which may be interest to this wiki page:"The Holders of Holderness; a history and genealogy of the Holder family with especial reference to Christopher Holder, head of the American Quaker branch" (1902) and "The Quakers in Great Britain and America; the religious and political history of the Society of Friends from the seventeenth to the twentieth century" (1913). Copies of both can be found in the Internet Archive.
--114.72.240.204 (talk) 08:17, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The first of these two books was used as a source in upgrading this article. Sarnold17 (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Couple of Books of Interest to this Page
Talk:Carcassonne Airport

message: Yes, merge Salvaza into this one as it is misnamed and more basic -- max rspct leave a message  12:33, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A no-brainer, I just merged them. Thanks/wangi 12:42, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Visvesvaraya National Institute of Technology Nagpur

message: Do we need to explicitly give the links of the various websites like Nanotech, HPC and VLSI Lab.
These links basically point to the pages on the same website. I have not removed them but if they are to explicity given then information  should be written about them and the links made there.
Sarafankit 12:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to HPC, VLSI & NanoTech

message: A single photo in the entire article? Can anybody upload their original productions for this entry, please?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.72.162 (talk) 14:24, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Where are the photographs?

message: The list of alumni is growing out of control and is taking over the article. To my opinion, it is becoming self-defeating, as nobody will read that long list of names.
True, such a long list is allowed as long as the alumni have their own article or have sufficient proof of being an alumni. 
What I hope for is that people start creating articles about the alumni mention here and in that way proof that the persons mentioned are really noteworthy! The Banner talk 13:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumni 
Talk:Gofer

message: Why is it gofer in the first paragraph and gopher (as in squirrel) in the second? If it's an alternate spelling it should be included in the first sentence.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.188.138.116 (talk • contribs) 12:42, 14 June 2006‎ (UTC) 
Are all of the parentheses necessary?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.89.154.114 (talk • contribs) 01:12, 4 April 2007‎ (UTC)
I agree  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.175.182.26 (talk) 14:56, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The usage of  is under discussion, see talk:gopher (animal) -- 70.50.148.122 (talk) 05:54, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|gopher}}"
Talk:Maní, Yucatán

message: Candlemas is usually celebrated around Feb. 2nd, but this article states that Mani marks the holiday on January 3rd. Is Mani an exception, or is that line inaccurate?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.255.41.99 (talk) 23:47, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candlemas
Talk:Izamal

message: I am recategorizing this from "Low" to "Mid" importance. Izamal was clearly one of the most important sites in Yucatán in pre-Columbian times.  -- Infrogmation 16:07, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for picking up on that, Infrogmation, and I agree with that reassessment. Cheers, --cjllw | TALK 23:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chacchoben

message: "...structures date from 700 AD. ...there were temples beneath these hills, which were naturally covered over a period of 2000 years"
The 2nd statement is obviously false -- as the ruins themselves aren't even 2000 years old!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.183.52.92 (talk) 07:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)