Talk:Encore (Eminem album)

message: Anyone know where the sample in this track comes from, or if its even a sample in the first place? --Kiand 12:01, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spend Some Time 

message: Eh, I think its really, really obvious that this album is called "Encore", not "3ncore", despite the reversed E. --Kiand 18:29, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The E may be reversed, but its not a three. --Kiand 20:45, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the... 

message: People, when you make a page on Eminem. Remember he's a rap artist. Not hip hop.
How silly can you get? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.173.173.4 (talk • contribs) .
*Rap is the same as hip-hop music.  Don't get it twisted, newbie. jglc | t | c 09:06, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as Wikipedia is concerned, Rap music is Hip-hop. If you feel like the two subjects need splitting, head over to Talk:Hip hop music and make your case there. Also, calling peoples newbies or "uptight runescpae nerding bastarding prick" is not really polite, or appropriate for a resource like Wikipedia. Hippoking 16:24, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rap or Hip-hop Dispute

message: :Does anyone else think this article sounds more like a review (especially the "Tracks" Section) than an encyclopedia article? L3th4l 19:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is original research. I will remove it as such until the contrib relists with citations. Daemon8666 19:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unencyclopedic

message: Section is NOT cited, is NOT encyclopedic in nature, and is entirely comprised of original research. Do not add again unless proper citations have been added to make the article's accuracy apparent.Daemon8666 20:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no facts until there are cited sources.Daemon8666 06:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Applicable wiki policy here Wikipedia:No_original_researchDaemon8666 06:53, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tracks

message: i don't believe he did but i just wanna prove 2 my <S>friend
 he didn't.
Yes, he did, actually -HeckXX (G,W,U,V) 23:38, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  did eminem really do that stuff that the book inside the album said? 

message: I read this phrase in the introduction "due to the leakage of the album on the Internet." I thought that was an extremely awkward and possibly incorrect use of the word "leakage".  I don't recall ever having heard the word leakage used like this; it does not mean "the state of being leaked", it refers to more of a process of leaking, and the "leak" of intellectual property is generally considered to be a one-time event>> It hasn't leaked, it leaked then, it has leaked. You wouldn't say "it is leaking". So I'm changing the word. 216.164.51.162 (talk) 23:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  question about word usage 

message: Encore was certified 5x in new zeland...5x in US..nd 3x in UK i guess.....Can anyone please put up the certifications on the main page .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Asid12345678 (talk • contribs) 09:03, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CERTIFICATIONS?? 

message: The following is unsourced information:
*On Eminem's official website track seven of this album was listed as "Christopher Reeves", yet it was removed and all songs before track seven are moved down one number. Apparently there was a song ready about Christopher Reeve but due to his death it was taken off the album. And to prevent leakage on the Internet, Eminem ordered Aftermath Entertainment producers to destroy all recorded copies of the song.
*The skits "Paul" and "Em Calls Paul" discuss Michael Jackson's anger at the music video for "Just Lose It." In "Em Calls Paul," Eminem's response references much of Jackson's work and his personal life:
 
While this is interesting, we can't use it unless you provide a source. Also, none of this is really trivia, as trivia by its definition is "unimportant information" - it therefore shouldn't be in a trivia section but instead the information should be incorporated into the main article. - Tbsdy lives (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 10:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: The year 2004 saw the release of Eminem's fourth major album, Encore. It sold over 700,000 copies in its first week of release. Now being certified 7 times platinum by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA). Selling over 15 million worldwide. With 7.8 million being sold in the United States. The album was another chart-topper, as it was driven by the single "Just Lose It"
:First of all, these claims are completely false. Secondly you don't have a source to back them up. If you make any of these phony changes I will revert them. It sold 5.1 in the U.S. and is certified 5x Platinum, not 7, and has sold over 11 million copies not 15.--Petergriffin9901 (talk) 05:38, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  15 million worldwide 

message: i think more should be mentioned of the critical response of Encore  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.214.129.15 (talk) 05:18, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical Response 

message: Who wrote this album? DanielDPeterson + talk 00:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song writers? 

message: Okay, I just went to the "Edit" page of the article and I found that some amateur tried to add an alternate cover to the infobox. Because there is no alternate cover for this album, I deleted that but something said "Template:Extra list" because I tried to fix the list of songles after I removed the amateur cover bug. Any help?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.101.221.8 (talk) 20:06, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  An alternate album cover for Encore?!?! 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Encore (Eminem album). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.ifpihk.org/www_1/go20e.php
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://promusicae.es/files/listassemanales/albumes/historial/TOP%20100%20ALBUMES%2005_01.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:14, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Encore (Eminem album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140209065956/http://www.stylusmagazine.com/review.php?ID=2506 to http://www.stylusmagazine.com/review.php?ID=2506
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Encore (Eminem album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6CPbPfOi3?url=http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?artist=Eminem to https://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?artist=eminem
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:13, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: At the risk of sounding sound prudish, is it really necessary to cite an exhaustive list of all the naughty words that were censored or changed for radio versions?  Whatever the point was of including that information was adequately made with an example or two, without simply becoming a childish list.  I'll bet whoever "contributed" all that is very amused that he/she got away with adding all that profanity to this global resource. Smratguy (talk) 00:55, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship of the censorship section