lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Long Vacation

message: Touching Moments
AS WE KONW that the japanese the economy is the sencod to the america so amazing for our oriential.
It is a long time that our chinese people have a deep historial opioion to them because of war surrend for our nation from 1921 to 1945.
IN additonal to stronger than any other countries in the world,it is frighting for our undevelopment units states.
I exhort our citizen we should contribute our mirecle to acceletatement finance for our hometown 
In my opinion there should be no section like "touching moments" in an encyclopedia
I agreed that there should be no touching moments in here as well.  This can be added to the Drama Wiki.  Wikipedia entry should be based on facts and not opinions of the subject.  Eleoopy (talk) 23:48, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Origami paper

message: This article was awful, it used text message lingo "ez-est". It should either be deleted or totally rewritten. I don't know enough about the subject to write anything meaningful, so I just cleaned up the typos.. --Yatpay 06:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up...

message: Koi paper is moe commonly known as kami, so i'll replace it as that. --Origamikid (talk) 18:26, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More cleanup

message: This is quite strange. "Kami" is the japanese word for "paper", so all that part of the article says is that paper is used as origami paper. "Kami" is not a special type of paper. All types of origami paper are "kami". After all, "origami" means "fold kami (paper)".
Ruebezahl (talk) 21:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kami?? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://japanobjects.com/features/washi-paper. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sam Sailor 14:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Murder of José Rafael Llenas Aybar

message: There are quite a few problems with this article:
(1) Narrative 
Some parts read more like a crime noir story than an encyclopedia entry;
'at a shopping center where the boy was hanging out with some of his classmates', and,
'Redondo stated that Luis Palma, the ambassador's husband, forced them to murder the boy, otherwise he'd kill Redondo's younger sister'.
(2) Grammar
A few problems with grammar, for example,
'Nonetheless, the spot where the body was found was a short distance away from land the where Palma-Meccia family dog breeding facilty, which made the Palmas' implication in the case at least plausible.'
(3) Imprecise wording
This is very important for the parts discussing the legal aspects of the case, such as referring to 10 years being reduced from the sentence after appeal as, 'slightly reduced', and the following justification for this, as,
'on account that he was not the killer per se, but more of a passive accomplice.'129.234.4.1 18:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I have tagged this article as having a missing LEAD section because the lead sentence or opening paragraph does not summarize the rest of the article, so I have no idea why this article is even notable enough to bother reading in detail. I have also tagged the article as needing sections so that various parts of the article are more accessible, rather than being a single block of text.
The genealogy section in the introduction is very distracting and takes the reader's attention away from the lines of text below it, as it acts as a divider, suggests the following text as unimportant, when it is not. In many respects, the genealogy section is unimportant as this sort of information should only be presented when and where it is appropriate to support the reader's understanding. If a family tree is included, it should be confined to either the bottom of the article, say, as an appendix or the significance of the victim's ancestors should be explained first, before the ancestral tree is presented. Otherwise this is almost irrelevant information. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 22:08, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction to this article
Talk:Hanson Field

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
Hanson Field is part of Western Illinois University. These coordinates are for Hanson Elementary in another part of Illinois (182 miles away).
Correct coordinates are approximately, 40.46845	-90.6842, judging by Google Maps.
—66.90.219.216 (talk) 22:32, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: . Thanks for pointing out the error. Deor (talk) 10:38, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Hasan bey Zardabi

message: I've read this article twice, and I can't see any claim that bey Zardabi was a mathematician besides the category tag. I'm removing that tag, because he was not a mathematician. (I also did a Google search and found authors who called him a journalist, an educator, and even a chemist ... but no connections with mathematics.)  DavidCBryant 11:38, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is he tagged as a mathematician? 
Talk:The Bronx (band)

message: When was he confirmed as a member? I never knew. Deanster123 10:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ken Horne 

message: I removed the (sold out) from "The band released two full length self-titled albums (in 2003 and 2006) as well as two limited edition (sold out) EPs including Bats!." 
- It's blatantly easy to buy La Muerte Viva from Amazon.
You got my bloody hopes up that I had a super rare EP on my hands :)
Tommyhaych 15:22, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate 

message: 7 p 142.169.16.170 (talk) 14:39, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  .tttt33 zsdd3 is t30
Talk:Hagley Museum and Library

message: Added a small gallery of images that I took at Hagley.--ukexpat 21:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery

message: Some material - including the gallery were erased when a new section was  placed en masse in the article.  My concern is that the new material needs to be improved to meet wikipedia's standards.  It might even be a copyright violation straight from the Hagely website.
In any case, please help to improve this material, check wikify, etc.
Smallbones (talk) 17:37, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newby
Talk:Low-residency program

message: Anyone adding new entries to the list, please be sure to keep the list alphabetized for easier reviewing.  Thanks.  Godheval (talk) 16:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of List of Colleges

message: I have heard that blog articles and commercial products are unacceptable forms of external links and so have removed these links for now. Open to suggestions (see history). Cyberscribe 23:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: I would very much like it if someone would add more citations for verification to this article. Low-residency is strongly associated with Goddard College, which the man whom I live with has been pressuring me to attend. If I attend Goddard, it would be very useful for me to know more about low-residency. A Wikipedia article in itself may not be a very good source of information, since anyone can in theory add misinformation; but a Wikipedia article with more citations may be very useful because (a) You will know that the content is verifiable, assuming the sources are reliable; (b) There will be links to off-Wikipedia sources, which may be very useful.--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 22:25, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 
Talk:Upfronts (2007)

message: Couldn't quickly find a resource aggregating all these announcements, so thought I'd start one here. The page definitely needs some work, but thought I'd get the ball rolling. Hope to hear ideas and objections on this talk page. --Thomas B 21:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: So what is Upfronts? The article doesn't provide a clue. — Loadmaster 21:57, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I've added a line linking to the general event. --Thomas B 06:36, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Topic

message: ABC is linked, much thanks to 86.129... I'm doing some when I can, but feel free to pitch in. This should be easy to macro... --Thomas B 06:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyperlinking
Talk:Toronto Raptors/Flaws

message: The research quality of this article is flawed on so many levels that it is baffling how anyone could have supported its promotion. Examples:
*Lack of diversity in sources. The article basically regurgitates NBA.com, citing it over 100 times. It is heavily biased towards one source of information, and peppering the article with a few other sources won't change that. Not only is the perspective limited because of this, but there are also remnants of plagiarism...
**A blatant misrepresentation. Not only has no one seconded you on the nomination page, you were refuted several times. 
***2nd op - you made several weak suggestions on how to diversify the sources and I think, and quite rightly so, they were not taken up because they were very weak suggestions. In contradistinction to the explanations provided as to why nba.com was used many times, and certainly not to the farcical extent you have insisted. Manderiko 12:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad research

message: In the nomination, even supporters agreed the language needed work, but a comprehensive copyedit never took place.
*Colorful and POV language. Examples: "ascendancy of Carter", "emphatically won", "offensive juggernaut", "furnished", "laissez-faire attitude", "sorely missed", "sacked", "unrest", "blessing in disguise", "entrenched".
*Annoying overuse of "however" and similar words.
**You must write very colourless prose then.
***2nd op - This is not even an issue. At all. Manderiko 12:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad writing, POV language

message: As Jayron32 pointed out, the Fanbase and Community sections are underdeveloped and require expansion. The Records section is empty. Sections common to other FAs, like Stadium, are absent. Information about colors, logos, jerseys, is scattered in the history section instead of in its own section. Compare to FAs like Arsenal F.C.
:No, compare that to this.
::OK. Arsenal F.C. is comprehensive compared to this. Punctured Bicycle 21:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not comprehensive

message: This article clearly needs a complete rewrite and should never have been promoted to featured article status.
:Apart from a couple of points about missing citations, all suggestions will not be taken up by me. Now let's hear what others say. Chensiyuan 10:10, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really think this is an exercise in bad faith. Look again at the nomination page and it becomes apparent. No further comment. Manderiko 13:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Trying to maintain encyclopedic standards is bad faith? Care to explain what "malicious motive" is in that? Punctured Bicycle 18:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a single person has agreed with your standards but 17 have agreed with my interpretation. Chensiyuan 16:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conclusion
Talk:Rugby league in Norway

message: The result was merge into Rugby league in Norway. -- Debate 木 08:00, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I believe this page should be merged with Norway national rugby league team, as that page has more references and historic content suitable to this article.
Opinions are needed,
Ymron (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Zhu Jian'er

message: "Chantrt" is not a word. 76.190.213.189 (talk) 23:53, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Chantrt"?
Talk:Geodesic manifold

message: this article defines a geodesically complete riemannian manifold (M,g) to be one that has the property (call it P) that any two points in the manifold M can be connected by a length-minimizing geodesic. i'm not sure this is the most precise definition of geodesic completeness: consider a proper open subset (say the unit open ball) in \mathbb{R}^n with standard euclidean metric g. then surely any two points in the ball can be connected by a length-minimizing geodesic (namely a straight line between the two points), but we don't consider the unit open ball to be geodesically complete because the spray of geodesics emanating from any point p in the ball runs out of the ball in finite time.
if we define geodesic completeness to mean that all geodesics have domain \mathbb{R}, rather than just an open subinterval of \mathbb{R}, then of course we get property P. but the example i show above seems to suggest the converse is not true. we want the more primitive notion of geodesic completeness; since geodesics can be understood as orbits of a hamiltonian vector field on the tangent bundle TM, this deeper definition gives a global hamiltonian flow on TM and thus a smooth action of (all of) \mathbb{R} on TM. merely assuming property P will not give this smooth action.
Mlord 21:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess my problem is related, but I don't know: is the geodesic unique, or does it suffice that there is a set of equally long geodesics? ... said: Rursus (bork²) 09:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As of this time, it appears that the article has been fixed, and whatever definition that was, was replaced by one that requires infinite length. So I guess this conversation is closed. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 03:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Inadequate definition

message: This article is jargon-filled, and completely opaque to a non-mathematician. I wouldn't have a clue how to fix it. Eaglizard (talk) 12:01, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ? I'm not sure that there is anything to be fixed. Unlike some topics, you sort-of have-to-have some understanding of what a geodesic is, and what a manifold is; these are bare-bones pre-requisites. If you know what a manifold is, and what a geodesic is, then all the "jargon" just melts away; its just plain-old ordinary language. I'll try to think about how to "simplify" this, but I am not sure it is possible. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 03:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baffling 

message: In 2011, there was some vandalism that deleted some basic definitions. The vandalism was uncaught at the time. The content should be restored. I'd do it, but I'm busy with other things. (The deleted content is not really all that important; it just states  a few basic definitions.) 67.198.37.16 (talk) 03:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism!
Talk:Riya (singer)

message: Hi there. I'm Riya, a British vocalist/songwriter in drum and bass. I've been working in drum and bass since 2009 and have just released my own album but this isn't obvious on Wikipedia...the only page relates to a Japanese singer. I want to rectify this but can't work out how disambiguation references and pages work...I can't get my head around it! :) Can somebody with the knowledge to do this please help me? I have the content and references to send to you as well as my discography and links to website www.riyamusic.com etc. I just need help creating it! Thanks. Riya
:That would potentially go under Riya (British singer) as with Dan Smith (British singer) and Leo the Lion (British singer). Consequently, this article would probably be moved to Riya (Japanese singer).--十八 19:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riya is also a British vocalist/songwriter in Drum and Bass
Talk:Digital native

message: — Assignment last updated by M. S. L. 01 (talk) 14:04, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: JMC 440 Research Methods in Public Relations

message: — Assignment last updated by Theworldsally (talk) 20:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Digital Sociology

message: Hello,
I don't know whether this will be of interest to Wikipedia in terms of who originally coined the term, "Digital Native," but I believe it was me in 1997, and its first use in public was for the domain I registered for the term in 1998. You can see the first release of the website here: https://web.archive.org/web/19981206120615/http://www.digital-native.com/.
As you can see, the original website is likely culturally insensitive by today's standards, and I did upgrade it to be more mindful and professional as I matured (http://www.digital-native.com). I intended it to mean essentially what everyone took it to mean: people who consider "digital" to be their native environment, but I was also applying it to myself and my little consulting biz.
At any rate, feel free to mention this if you think it adds to the history of the term. Thanks for all you do to provide relevant, truthful information to the world. I support Wikipedia whenever I can.
Sincerely,
David Simerly Dksimerly (talk) 18:46, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coining the term 

message: — Assignment last updated by Follower52 (talk) 14:39, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Digital Writing
Talk:Gratitude (band)

message: I was unaware of the AfD, but the article as it now stands definitely passes NALBUM, and there is clearly enough coverage to substantiate a separate article. Is there good reason to follow the outcome given the work done on the article over the course of that AfD? Chubbles (talk) 12:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: said in the discussion that merging is sensible with the band's only album being notable enough and the band's article is short in size. I would've voted to keep it, but in the end, I agreed with the said user. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 06:12, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's certainly true that this article could use some sprucing up, but it has the potential to be reasonable in size, and with the substantial coverage the album received in reviews, it also could be expanded beyond pure skeleton. I just don't see any particularly compelling reason to merge (except to placate the deletion nominator, who didn't really make a case for deletion and was the only one who !voted delete). Chubbles (talk) 14:46, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , I'm fine with having the article kept. It only needs to be improved a bit. And so does the band's article. ASTIG😎 (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 01:36, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, see, someone has come along and merged it, and then someone else has come along and decimated the content. I believe we should restore the album article, and it's not clear to me whether I can just do that (since the sources were added since the AfD was ended) or I have to go to DELREV (since the sources were added since the AfD was started). Chubbles (talk) 13:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

text: Whoops! I see you did some work on the article mere hours before the merge, so you've demonstrated there is additional sourcing since the close of the AfD. That means we can restore it without a G4 speedy. I'll do so. Chubbles (talk) 13:11, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge contesting
Talk:Alcohol laws in Germany

message: "German licensing laws" would be an alternative title. Don't know what you prefer... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flaaa (talk • contribs) 21:56, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this really correct? I think there is probably many countries on the globe with nearly no restrictions on alcohol.
:That would be what countries? Can't imagine...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.52.147.34 (talk) 14:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In Ethiopia you can buy any type of alcohol at the age of 15 and many countries seem to have no explicit laws about a minimal consumption age at all: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_drinking_age --2A02:908:1467:A460:F14B:ABD4:5582:B988 (talk) 17:43, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:   least restrictive ones in the world ? 

message: I'm here in Germany and I keep hearing all over that teens under 18 can't buy alcohol anymore. I can't find any info about it online though. Apparently, it went into effect January 1st. Has anyone heard of this? If it's true, it's relevant to the article. 84.59.58.80 (talk) 22:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's not true. The alcohol laws haven't been changed. I keep hearing about that too, but it's wrong. Probably people mix up the recent discussions and the new ban of TOBACCO for minors.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.52.144.102 (talk) 11:05, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  changes to the law? 

message: Excluded the following sentence: "However, the drinking age for undistilled drinks in the state of Hesse has been raised to 18."
:I have not found any confirming information about this on the internet. Moreover, I think that youth protection laws are federal business and cannot be changed by particular states. Sources would be needed!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.176.72.25 (talk) 11:23, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hesse? 

message: The article uses the word brandy, presumably as a translation of German Branntwein, but in English brandy refers to a specific drink. In every case it should probably be rendered as "distilled spirits" or just "spirits". Where quoting the official English translation of the law, it may be acceptable to let that stand with notice of the law's definition of brandy, but otherwise usage in the text should conform to that of standard English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.247.89.142 (talk) 15:25, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Brandy"
Talk:St Paul's Suite

message: We call it a suite for string orchestra, and categorise it as a composition for string orchestra.  But we also say Holst added wind parts.  I'm unsure if this means the piece as normally played today is confined to strings alone, or includes winds, or there are 2 versions which conductors can choose from.  Can anyone enlighten me?  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 22:24, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Holst prepared this piece originally for a girls' string orchestra. If you need a source, I'll locate one. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs)  16:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I got sidetracked, sorry.  OK, so the original version was for strings alone.  Are we saying he later wrote a different version, with winds added to the strings?  Is this windy version ever played or recorded? (I've only ever heard the work referenced as St Paul's Suite for Strings).  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 11:26, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not aware of any wind ensemble or concert orchestra versions that he wrote; these may be arrangements of his work by other people. Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs)  19:15, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this might interest you: http://www.classical.net/music/comp.lst/works/holst/stpaul.php Enjoy! Bob the WikipediaN (talk • contribs)  19:19, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Strings alone?