lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tlacaelel

message: Fellow editors: is there some sort of consensus numbering scheme for these Hueyi Tlaloani?  
This Tlacaelel article, grabbed somewhat from the Reference, lists Itzcoatl and Moctezuma I as  the first and second emperor but our template list has them at Hueyi Tlaloani #5 & #6.  And then I saw a article on the web that has them at 4 & 5 (it doesn't count Tenoch).  
I like to refer to them at times by number because I believe it helps us non-Nahua to wrap our minds around some of these long and unfamiliar names and understand the flow of history better.  Madman 03:15, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Need a way to number Mexica/Aztec rulers

message: i found this at delong.typepad.com, by Brad DeLong who quotes the book "The Theology of Human Misery" by Charles Mann (2005), 1491 (New York: Knopf: 140004006X), p. 188: "...[the Aztec Empire's] presiding genius was Tlacaelel (1398-1480)...". someone should check into the dates for tlacaelel. but most of the other sites i found have the ones listed in wiki's own article. the reason i looked it up is cuz that's a question posted in the 02-04 talk: archives, and hasn't been crossed out. should i cross it out, to show its been answered? or leave it alone, since the current talk: page says to leave the archives alone? 4.230.168.250 23:55, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Mr 250, there is a degree of uncertainty in all Aztec dates except perhaps the specific dates around the Spanish conquest.  I'll check what sources I have.  Why don't you go check a few other places and we'll meet back here and compare notes??  Madman 02:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I realise it's been, well, a year since this issue was raised but the DOB/DOD don't correspond to my sources either.  Leon-Portilla's "The Aztec Image of Self and Society" (1992) states Tlacaelel died before Axayacatl died in 1481. Piedmon Sama 09:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I have placed a footnote with respect to Tlacaélel's birth year. Does anyone know where the 1397 date came from? --Bejnar (talk) 17:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Mann is not a realiable  source for claims about the Aztecs.·Maunus·ƛ· 05:00, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is correct DOB & DOD?? 

message: These citations to Durán need to be put into proper footnotes with page cites.  I have done the first one. --Bejnar (talk) 17:57, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Durán
Talk:Dave the Chameleon

message: Is it worth adding a link to http://www.backingblair.co.uk/dave/ - a rather good parody of the first Dave video by the team at BloggerHeads? I would do it, but I'm not very good with this whole wikipedia thingie. Adancy 14:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parody 

message: As the 2006 Local Elections are now over, should the "Current Event" tag at the top of this page be removed?CPCHEM 17:25, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, done. In fact, considering the Labour party ditched Dave the Chameleon before the end of the campaigning period, I doubt we'll be seeing any more of him in the future. DWaterson 10:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it was not ditched. The third broadcast was never going to be a Dave the Chameleon film. David | Talk 11:48, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Event? 

message: Dave the chameleon → Dave the Chameleon – To correct the capitalisation of the title. Hopefully this is uncontroversial; do we need to take a vote?
:Shouldn't think so, I listed it in the moves due to capitalization category weeks ago though... --Robdurbar 11:02, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it be moved. Martinp23 20:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 08:57, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Someone added this to the criticisms sections:
'Many commentators have also noted that the campaign was flawed to the extent that it shows Cameron in a positive light. Many people like the idea that Cameron is not going to choose a bad policy and stick to it, and that he listens to what people have to say.'
Though not necessarily disagreeing with the sentiments in the paragraph, the problem is that it includes Weasel Words such as 'many commentators', without attributing this opinion to anybody; ditto 'many people'. This hides a viewpoint of possibly one person, and claims that it is held by 'many'. This paragraph needs to be sourced. --Robdurbar 08:50, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Balancing Paragraph

message: I's just like to say, it really humoured me that this page has a "Spoiler warning" :d LOL Jamesedwardsmith 22:36, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Category talk:Magic (illusion)

message: I've noticed that there are a number of magicians listed on this page - my understanding is that it is inappropriate to include articles in a parent category when they are already listed in the appropriate subcategory, in this case the various subcats in :Category:Professional magicians. The relevant guideline is at Wikipedia:Categorization/Categories and subcategories. Unless someone objects in the next few days I'll recategorize all the people in this category into the appropriate subcat. Ziggurat 04:17, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. I have done the recategorising again. --Andrewaskew (talk) 00:42, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: People in this category

message: I've tried to put this subcategory in the article, and it won't go.  Anyone who can help?  Please.  7&6=thirteen (talk) 18:01, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Martinka]] and Manufacturers and Designers of Magic Effects/Illusions Subcategory
Talk:Republic of Korea Army

message: It looks like the Order of Battle section is now becoming a directory book of the ROK Army. Is it necessary to list down all the unit?Bin2k1 11:25, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of Battle 

message: The charts for ROK army enlisted ranks excludes sergeants and corporals from the Non-commissioned officer table.  This is surprising.  Are there two groups of NCOs?
USN distinguishes Chief Petty Officers (E-7–E-9) from lesser petty officers (E-4–E-6.)  Likewise, USMC differentiates sharply between Staff NCOs (E-6–E-9) and corporals and sergeants (a/k/a fours and fives.)  But they're all NCOs.
----AndersW (talk) 20:24, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enlisted ranks 

message: Does the ROKA have an official song or march, like the USMC's "Halls of Montezuma"? Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 05:14, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: EDIT: Never mind, found it. Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 05:17, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official song/march? 

message: dhjw (talk) 06:26, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section reads like opinion and needs revision 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Reublic of Korea Army. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 25#Reublic of Korea Army until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  the ultraUsurper 04:08, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Reublic of Korea Army" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: 제목 정확히 맞습니다. 에이전트 에이전시 123 (talk) 06:50, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  한국군은 대한민국의 미래
Talk:Goof Troop

message: Click the name of the producer of the video game. bad link bad.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.168.198.211 (talk • contribs) .
: Fixed.  Also, please sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~.  Thanks.  Powers 16:25, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad wikilink

message: Couldn't we jusr put all the memorable quotes in wikiquote?81.79.245.114 14:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Memorable quotes

message: It seemed someone had vandalized the page. I don't know how to revert it so I tried (based on revision history) to add some paragraph the vandal had erased. Kunderemp (talk) 13:04, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism? 

message: Is Goofy really a widower in this show? Wouldn't it be better to write "divorced"? Do they ever mention that his wife died? If so, I must have missed that episode. - Aphasia83 (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Widower?

message: Brad Garrett is listed as a guest actor here: http://www.tv.com/goof-troop/to-catch-a-goof/episode/182788/summary.html
The credits of the episode can be seen here, at the end: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Dhu8FFlq58  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.148.246.16 (talk) 15:27, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Brad Garrett

message: I had to invent other episodes that have not yet imagined:
*Pete the Wonder Man
*My Wife Lies Over the Ocean
*Lady Pistol
*Street Goofy
*Battle of the Friends
*Peg Troop
*The JunkPete
*Alpine Animals
*Hawaii Six-0
*Rock Around the Max
*The Legend of Super Goof
*The Day The Goof Stood Still
*Ten Little Goofs
*Lights, Action Goofs
*Deja Goof
*Karate Goof
*Four Goofs and an Lion
*Goofy and P.J. vs. Big Dog
*A Bad Phoenix in the Pete
*Super Kids
*Like Goofs, Like Sons, Part 1
*Like Goofs, Like Sons, Part 2
09:15, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episodes 

message: What Network in Canada did Goof Troop Aired?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.91.203.113 (talk) 23:49, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada
Talk:Somerset County Football League Premier Division

message: Please review in which leagues these clubs are playing: Mangotsfield United, Backwell United and Backwell United. There seems to be a contradiction here regarding these clubs. The information I received for this article were from this website: .So which piece of information is the correct one? --Siva1979Talk to me 04:25, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, thanks for clearing this. --Siva1979Talk to me 19:01, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect info?
Talk:John Clare

message: Under Midlife reads: "The Shepherd's Calendar (1827) met with little success, which was not increased by his hawking it himself." What does this term 'hawking' mean? Is there any other synonyms that we can use to describe this, as it seems like a culture specific slang? Tradereddy (talk) 03:34, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, it's not slang, but since the law today forbids the unlicensed hawking of goods in the street, we don't use it nearly as much as our ancestors did. Mind you, in India... Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of words 

message: In this episode from July 2013, "Presenter Tim Wonnacott visits Peterborough Museum and looks at artefacts belonging to 'Peasant Poet' John Clare, including his snuffbox and the poem he was writing when he died." But no longer available in iPlayer; alas. Martinevans123 (talk) 23:54, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''[[Flog It!]]'' 

message: The statements "Clare was a Anglican" and "Clare honours the figure of Christ in poems such as "the Stranger"" need reliable secondary sources, with page numbers, not just the primary material or links to commercial book selling sites. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Poem Hunter is a perfectly good source to support an extract from the poem "The Stranger", but not for what it's about. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spiritual influence
Talk:Giuseppe Tornatore

message: The prose doesn't flow, seems like a translation. Needs copyediting.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.116.59.84 (talk) 06:32, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems to be a translation? 
Talk:Embezzlement

message: The German link to this article should be "Veruntreuung". Does anybody disagree?
92.195.239.117 (talk) 14:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

message: This article involves a great deal of legal jargon, tangents, rambling, and suffers from a general lack of citations, especially in the "Versus larceny" section, which I think need not be longer than a paragraph at most, since the distinction seems pretty clear to me. Also doesn't seem quite right to define embezzlement largely in terms of what it is not. Solobear89 (talk) 17:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Readability improvements
Talk:Discount store

message: Hello, a new WikiProject called Retailing has been created, and we invite anyone who is interested in joining to sign up. If you would like to join it, then list your name on Wikipedia:Wikiproject/List_of_proposed_projects#Retailing.
Tuxide 00:37, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject:  Retailing
Talk:Rabbinical translations of Matthew

message: Howard's response to Petersen's review also ought to be taken into consideration.   http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/vol04/Howard1999.html
I added a link to Petersen's review http://rosetta.reltech.org/TC/vol03/Petersen1998a.html the content of which should probably be integrated into the article. Eluchil404 12:12, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I propose that we merge the 3 articles about the Hebrew manuscripts here: Shem Tov Matthew, the DuTillet Matthew, and the Munster Matthew. All three are stubs and this article is even moreso a stub. By combining the forces of all 4 of these articles, we could create a more robust single article.-Andrew c 01:51, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good set of decisions Andrew. I can imagine expanding and splitting from here, but it will take some time and research. There are some fringe Aramaic primacists, however, there are many mainstream scholars who consider the gospel of Matthew to reflect an earlier, Aramaic (not Hebrew) version. Regarding the NT, Aramaic primacy is fringe, regarding Matthew, it is quite a viable alternative hypothesis, though out of fashion now. Redating Matthew, Mark and Luke by the highly reputable John Wenham is an excellent source on this issue. Alastair Haines 18:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Since the 3 rabbinical versions are distinct, wouldn't plural be better? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:14, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections? In ictu oculi (talk) 14:56, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Gospels (plural)?

message: This should be an article about 14thC Spanish Jewish response to conversion/persecution, not the place for more cut and paste (probably done about 2006) of material already healthily duplicated on a dozen pages. I've blanked/hidden about 3/4 of the Christian lost Hebrew Gospel POV material leaving only what is specific to George Howard's theory about Shem Tov's Touchstone. Switched categories from Biblical criticism to Jewish outreach, Jewish Spanish history etc.In ictu oculi (talk) 14:56, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate POV Aramaic/Hebrew/Gospel of the Hebrews material blanked

message: There is one question I want to know about the various proposed Hebrew of Aramaic versions of Matthew (or other Gospels) when Jesus calls the Queen of Sheba the "Queen of the South" which of the up to 5 different Hebrew words of South is used?  This issue has the potential play into debate about Sheba.  The standard Yemen view has it likely Jesus said Yamin or Teman or possibly Yam.  But those who try to make her an Egyptian Pharaoh would want to see Negev here to support their tying this quote of Jesus into Daniel 11.  Meanwhile references to the South Wind like Luke 12:55 and 13:29 would probably use Darom.--JaredMithrandir (talk) 11:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Queen of The South
Talk:Blenheim, New Zealand

message: Any chance of a picture?-gadfium 04:42, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, thanks.-gadfium 06:38, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

text: No problem.--Matt von Furrie 20:33, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Sicilian

message: I recently furnished and rewrote this entry, adding an infobox, book cover, production and ISBN details, character sections with detailed information regarding the main characters and details regarding the plot and adaptations. Ganryuu 16:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Furnished entry

message: The plot needs a LOT of hard work. Lots42 (talk) 21:22, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: Hi all
I think there should be a clarification of the sequence of novels.
To be accurate about the Godfather "Trilogy" the novels written as the so called "followed by" should be changed.
The novel which Puzo wrote and followed this one is Omerta. The novels which are currently listed as the next in sequence after this one are written by people which are not Puzo
Can someone clarify as to why this has been left this way - Was it because the article was written before 2000 ? and do we need to correct this mistake now ?
thanks
Chaosdruid (talk) 09:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Where are you seeing this sequence? I do not see the words you see. Lots42 (talk) 05:02, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct sequence of Godfather "trilogy" 

message: There needs to be a plot summary at the top of the page to sum up in two or three sentances what the story is about. The actual plot section needs to be culled down considerably. 80.235.138.77 (talk) 09:16, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Summary
Talk:Irish Hunger Memorial

message: The article says it is a quarter-acre, as do several other sites and the Irish President's inaugural address but some others say it is a half-acre, such as the NYC mayor's press release and the Battery Park City Authority website. Someone is authority is wrong. Anyone know the real answer. I visited it again recently but omitted to look for any acreage info. Maybe I need to visit again and pace out the size to determine the answer. Cheers ww2censor 01:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Site size

message: The NY Times reviewed this Memorial after it opened.  It be good to add a few quotes from that with the citation. — Lentower (talk) 03:01, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Add NY Times citation?
Talk:Geek Core

message: Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought.  With that in mind, I have recommended this article for deletion based on the fact that no significant secondary sources can be found.  If the author can produce evidence of a cultural movement outside of Wikipedia, please show your sources.
Wyntyr
Well, if this isn't completely fabricated then I don't know what is.
This article is junk and ought to be deleted for the junk it is.
Delete this.  There is nothing of encyclopedic merit in the article.
This article leaves out a lot of details regarding dragon shirts and neckbeards.
Honestly, I can't see how this is anywhere near important enough to warrant an entry. It reads more like someone's personal manifesto than a factual article. I agree with the deletion proposal.
Chris Buckey 06:28, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Let's delete this article. It is just some guy's ramblings about something that probably does not exist.Gary 16:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete
Talk:Matthew Wood (sound editor)

message: Previous text was a copy of : . Deleted it. sinblox (talk) 04:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Informatics (disambiguation)

message: Organisational informatics redirects here. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 10:36, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  un-redirected and proposed a merge with business informatics. —Ruud 16:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

text: I have already taken a look at some of the potential candidates for disambiguation. None of them seemed to refered to the academic field article that was here before. Actually in most of the articles (or paragraphs) pointing here it wasn't even always clear to me which meaning was intended. So fixing those disambiguations would probably not be a good use of my time. —Ruud 19:18, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: I found this interesting query: library science,information science,library and information science,medical informatics,informatics,computer science. —Ruud 19:28, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Ngram Viewer 

message: We completed move of disambiguation page to Informatics (disambiguation), and moved Informatics (academic field) to Informatics as the primary topic, per WP:DAB.  TheProfessor (talk) 21:06, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Alexander duality

message: this had two errors of substance; if you're going to (partially) revert then be aware of them.  First, it is patently false that removing a point from the complement of a compact set in the sphere or euclidean space does not alter its homotopy type or homology/cohomology groups.  Second (because of that) the statement was incorrect.  An example is furnished by the 1 dimensional line and the point.  According to the previous version, we have the reduced homology of the point (0) equal to the reduced cohomology of two intervals (which is the ground ring).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.190.4.212 (talk) 01:51, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I shall certainly check the statement in Spanier's book. The article as it stands has no reference of any sort, which is unsatisfactory. Removing the reference to Spanier isn't therefore best practice. Charles Matthews (talk) 07:13, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One sentence reads as follows, supposedly as an example of Alexander-Whitehead duality:
"For example the Clifford torus construction in the 3-sphere shows that the complement of a solid torus is another solid torus; which will be open if the other is closed, but this doesn't affect its homology."
This construction shows no such thing, because the claim that "the complement of a solid torus [in the 3-sphere is another solid torus" is false!  (For example, consider the complement of a knotted torus.)
Rather. what the duality theorem shows is that the complement of a solid torus in the 3-sphere has the same reduced homology as the solid torus itself.  This should be fixed, since it's a reasonable example of the application of the theorem.
Also, together with the Hurewicz theorem, this shows that if T is a (closed) solid torus embedded in S3 in any manner, and Y denotes S3 - T, then the fundamental group G of Y made abelian — i.e., factored out by its commutator subgroup [G, G] — must be isomorphic to the integers Z.  
For, by the Hurewicz theorem, G / [G, G] = H1(Y) = H1(S3 - T). And by Alexander duality, H1(S3 - T) is isomorphic to H(3-1-1)(T) = H1(T), which is known to equal Z.Daqu (talk) 05:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous statement 

message: The section "Alexander's 1915 result" is very poorly written.
All the stuff about flipping the Betti numbers and shifting them "not working out" is incomprehensible to most readers because it gives no reason to do what is done to the Betti numbers, and completely fails to state just what it is that "doesn't work out".
This should be written instead by someone who is able to understand the reader's point of view.50.205.142.35 (talk) 04:40, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly thought out
Talk:Ministry of Darkness

message: I removed Edge, Christian, and The Big Boss Man from the Tag Team Title section. Edge and Christian first won the Tag Titles in 2000, long after they had left the Ministry of Darkness. The Big Boss Man was never even in the Ministry. However, Undertaker and Big Show (the Unholy Union) won the tag team titles twice, and even though it was near the end of the Ministry, it deserves to be included. Nikki311 21:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag Team Titles 
Talk:Daniel Hollie

message: Is Danny still dating Gail Kim? (MgTurtle 02:37, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gail Kim?
Talk:Lynx Lake (Arizona)

message: Dear Wikipedians, I will try to do my best on this article on Lynx Lake, Sincerely Hey Joe what you know? (talk) 02:36, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I will try to do my best 