lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of trails in Grand Canyon National Park

message: This list is not complete (there are more trails than indicated), especially in the Non-backcountry trails section.  Also, most trails listed in all sections are missing articles.  I am working on providing some of these, but would like some help from anyone who has research materials (i.e. trail guides) to provide articles and content.  Even if all you can create is a stub, it is one less redlink on this page!  Notary137 02:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After some thought I decided to remove the redlinks, listing trails without articles unlinked.  This article should be edited each time a trail's article is added to Wikipedia.  Notary137 04:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Completeness and redlinks

message: Now that I've added it, the Management section seems out of place in a list article.  I think I'll move it to Grand Canyon National Park.  Notary137 06:24, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After thinking, it is on-topic, but may be better off at the end of the article.  Rather than tinker with my own article, I'll leave it as-is unless someone else wants to chime in or edit this themselves.  Notary137 02:26, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving Management section 

message: It seems like I'm talking to myself here.  Internal debate led me to delete my own edit including fee information for backcountry use permits, since this could be construed as advertising (public sector, but still an advert.)  Will try and craft a better section regarding permits.  Notary137 02:24, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fee information 

message: Please only use trail names to link to articles on the trails themselves as this is the purpose of the list.  If necessary, I will redlink them to the articles as needed.  Notary137 05:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links from trail names
Talk:Jimmy Dorsey

message: is non-factual, speculative and unnecessary. Out of place, in other words. Godingo 18:35, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  That last sentence 

message: See Wikipedia:Footnotes for an explanation of how to generate footnotes using the <ref(erences/)> tags Nhl4hamilton (talk) 10:46, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations & References

message: I'm deleting this sentence because Harry James didn't have a band in 1938.  "According to the tsort.info database (http://tsort.info/music/wjc1ce.htm), the Harry James recording of "It's the Dreamer in Me" reached no. 9 in 1938 on Billboard, staying on the charts for 3 weeks."  I propose it be added back if someone can prove Harry James had a band that year and a hit with that song.70.125.135.72 (talk) 21:28, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: RE:Harry James "recording" of "It's The Dreamer In Me"

message: This article mentions that he died of throat cancer.  The mention of Jimmy on Tommy Dorsey's page and on the Dorsey Brothers page says it was lung cancer.  A general search of the internet turns up both. I don't feel qualified to determine which source should be used for a citation, but all three pages should be consistent. Arbalest Mike (talk) 02:07, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of Death (Type of Cancer)
Talk:Germanic verbs

message: The semantic development of *woida is in this article in two different places, once under strong verbs and once under preterite-presents. It can't be both. As German wissen is clearly preterite-present, I think it should be the latter, but I'd rather this were corrected by someone who is more specialized. --Doric Loon (talk) 20:16, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  *woida
Talk:Tom and Huck

message: This article has been renamed from Tom and Huck (1995 film) to Tom and Huck as the result of a move request.
 The result was move to Tom and Huck. -- Wassupwestcoast (talk) 01:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. Makes sense to me. Article names should be as simple as possible. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 15:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 01:02, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:List of tallest mountains by country

message: Can this list be checked? I already found 2 critical errors and I'm not well-versed in mountains. Here are basic things to check:
* The mountain in question is indeed in the country indicated
* The mountain in question really has the height in question
* The highest peak in the country in question is really the height claimed in the article
-- Ynhockey (Talk) 03:09, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this list was derived from List of countries by highest point. See the references there. It was originally derived from a very poorly researched CIA list. I corrected many errors, but there may be more; new errors are still coming to light. The Israel and Uruguay information was not incorrect, but it was incorrectly linked. I have corrected it. Viewfinder 07:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Now that the List of countries by highest point is sortable by country, I am wondering if this list is serving any purpose at all. The problem with keeping it is that the highest point of countries is revised regularly as new information comes to light. Maintaining two lists creates more work, and it is impossible to monitor contradictions with 100% accuracy. I therefore propose that this list should be redirected to the list of countries by highest point. Viewfinder 22:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this list necessary?
Talk:Rugby union in Romania

message: "Rugby tours between countries on either side of the Iron Curtain have generated considerable political interest among the governments concerned, and the results can be quite astonishing. The recent Rumanian tour of New Zealand, for instance, germinated other contacts between the two countries and was partly instrumental in the establishment of new trade agreements which otherwise might not have begun." Was Rumania instead of Romania a Wikipedia error or an error by the New Zealand Rugby player? Mobile mundo (talk) 00:32, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumania or Romania
Talk:Hiyori Sarugaki

message: The reason Hiyori used the term "Baldie" is not because Ichigo and Shinji are bald, but because they're clueless about what she's saying.  It was stated in Ch. 217 by Hiyori herself when Ichigo complained about her constant usage of the term.
Finestela 03:10, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Baldie"
Talk:Steve Leialoha

message: Missing from the bibliography is the one-shot Trypto the Acid Dog!, published by Renegade Press, as well as the short Trypto story published in A1 issue 5, Atomeka Press (the Trypto appearances in Dark Horse Presents are on the list.) I will not add this myself, as I an publisher of a current collection of the Trypto stories, and thus have strong WP:COI. --Nat Gertler (talk) 00:13, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing from the bibliography
Talk:Lists of musicians

message: I was wondering if there was a style that could be set for musical (bands, artists, etc...) pages, just so that one can make sense/compare one artist to another easier
--SeanJA 03:23, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: Left handed musicians! Color-blind musicians! Musicians who can roll their tongues! Why are people being so inside-the-box with their thinking? - DavidWBrooks (talk) 21:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More lists desperately needed 

message: Strict-T
Strict-T is a very famous rapper in the new age who keeps it old school. He was born in Knoxville, TN, and grew up in Atlanta, GA. He started his rapping career when he was in 6th grade along with his now known group member Chill Will. Strict-T moved back to Georgia and started meeting new people to help him with his raps such as Prince N.Y.C., King Cade, and Lucky Lou. He hated the southside because of their style of rap and because they had hatred towards him for reasons he did not know. When he grew up to his teen years, he moved to Los Angeles, CA. He then had success in his rap career and even made a diss' to Lil' Wayne and the whole southside. Strictt (talk) 20:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strict-T
Talk:Gahanananda

message: I just wonder whether persons born in the then East Bengal in undivided India and holding Indian national citizenship now can be called Bangladeshi People. VMO 03:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if there was a category People of Bangladeshi origin, or equivalent, I'd have added that. You can't change the fact that his birthplace is Sylhet. Thank you. --Ragib 03:50, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your dificulty is well understood. That's why I have not dared to remove it. But I humbly submit that there are innumerable notable people of Bangladesh origin but are staying outside without its present nationality affiliation. A new category seems to be necessary. Let us think it over. OK. However, I hasten to add that even in my wildest dream, I would not imagine changing the birthplace of anyone! Peace! VMO 01:36, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Swamiji, thanks for your wise comment. I am aware of the issue, which often creates quite a lot of unpleasantness in a lot of pages. We cannot ignore their birth places, but again, their later migration adds a problem. But anyway, thanks again for your polite comment. I hope we'd resolve this categorization issue soon. Thanks. --Ragib 01:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cat Bangladeshi People

message: Biographical information for Swami Gahananandaji can be found here:
* Belur Math Website
* December 2007 'Prabuddha Bharata' (a 4 MB PDF file)
Devadaru (talk) 03:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:M-40 (Michigan highway)

message: M-40 used to go further into Holland to River Ave.  Anyone remember when or why MDOT relenquished control?  My hunch was budget reasons.  It was before Business 31/196 was turned back.  That reaspn was on street parking. Dwp49423 00:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Belda

message: Please don't add links to personal pages. I've deleted the link. I appreciate your effort but please refrain from publicising your own webpages. Remember we all write and edit for the greater good.  If you have objections please write at my talk page or here. Thanks. :) --Antorjal 03:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2007 NLL season

message: For anyone who sees the standings, (as of January 22,) the National Lacrosse League website, (the source of these, obviously,) has the .600 winning percentage Rochester ahead of .667 winning percentage Chicago. I'm not sure why this is, (I guess they sort it by wins instead of winning %,) or whether it would be better to change it. Any opinions? Omega Graecisso 23:36, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say just display the standings as they are displayed on the NLL web site. That's the easiest. --MrBoo (talk, contribs) 01:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Re: Final Standings.  The Wings finished in 6th according to the league rules, which I've confirmed with the league office.  Pointstreak has a sorting problem with tiebreakers.  It'll be sorted out soon, so I've corrected it here.  198.177.148.178 20:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The above post was me.  Sorry, forgot to login. Mountainhawk 20:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Standings
Talk:Oscillistor

message: from American Institute of Physics 
A new magneto-oscillatory effect has been observed in the electron-hole plasma within a semiconductor. The plasma can be produced by such agents as contact injection and optical or thermal excitation of minority carriers. When the semiconductor specimen is subjected to an electric field (through suitable contacts) and a magnetic field, current oscillations can be detected across a series load resistance. This device has been termed the oscillistor to suggest a semiconductor oscillator. The experiments suggest that the oscillistor mechanism involves a magnetically induced interaction of the bulk plasma of electrons and holes with the exposed free surface areas of the specimen. ©1960 The American Institute of Physics
--Light current 22:47, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing conclusive :( --Yuriy Lapitskiy 15:57, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abstract
Talk:Livingstonite

message: I just threw this page together quickly because I noticed it didn't exist.  I'm not a geologist, or affiliated with any linked sites, please fix this one up!  - JustinWick 03:33, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks OK to me -- thanks. Added a photo +, Pete Tillman (talk) 04:26, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Caudron

message: Should this perhaps be under Société des Avions Caudron like the French version of the article is? -- Avocado (talk) 01:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? BilCat (talk) 01:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because that's the actual name of the entity?  Fwiw, I don't feel super strongly about it, but noticed the disconnect and also the French article being under the full name and figured it couldn't hurt to bring up. -- Avocado (talk) 01:31, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The primary reason the French article is at fr:Société des avions Caudron is because fr:Caudron is a disambiguation page there. We don't have that here, so it's at the most common name and primary topic, Caudron. The German, Catalan, Czech, Portuguese, and Russian articles are also at "Caudron", probably for the same reasons. BilCat (talk) 01:37, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, that makes more sense now.  Thank you for the explanation! -- Avocado (talk) 01:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

text: I've created a redirect at Société des Avions Caudron, since one didn't exist. BilCat (talk) 01:39, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good compromise.  Thank you! -- Avocado (talk) 01:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested move
Talk:Fairey III

message: There is a swedish wikipedia article on this aircraft, but I'm not sure how to edit the links for other languages. Someone who does should get on it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.121.234.101 (talk) 13:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

message: WT:MILHIST#Mystery Photograph Cross-posted here to request help. WCMemail 09:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mystery Photograph
Talk:Avro 626

message: It would be good to know:
more about the Tatra builds, with a ref;
if the Portuguese did build any under licence? JAWA 1942 notes the 626 as "at present in production" but no numbers.
did the Chinese really "build one themselves " ref?  According to Jackson they got 9 from Avro; www.goldenyears.ukf.net/reg_VR-H.htm suggests at least 2 of AJJ's 4 demonstrators  went to the Chinese gov. as well.
where did the Spanish aircraft originate (there were folk from both sides buying all sorts of aircraft across Europe at the time)?;
TSRL (talk) 21:38, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Airspeed Consul

message: Some vandalized words and numbers restored to the Development paragraph, but as I am not sure about the wartime users and whether they include the RCAF and RNZAF I have left them out. And South Africa operated under the Joint Air Training Scheme, not the Empire Air Training scheme. 
So wartime users are shown as the RAAF & SAAF only, not the RAF, RNZAF, RCAF, RAAF and SAAF. Hugo999 (talk) 12:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (U.S. state and territory highways)

message: There was a discussion back in October 2017 about the usage of "U.S." vs. "US" in the MOS section (MOS:US) in terms of what the MOS recommends. The Chicago Manual of Style (16th ed.) has recommended dropping the periods for eight years now, and based on the survey of other major style guides given as a part of the discussion, our MOS was updated to encourage "US" as the default over "U.S." for commonality reasons, while allowing the continuing usage of the latter.
Should we update  this naming convention for article titles to drop the periods, moving U.S. Route 66 to US Route 66, et al.? We need not worry at this time about any technical issues with moving pages; we can enlist bots, etc. to assist with the actual work. Imzadi 1979 →  15:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly I don't care whether or not we use periods in "U.S." If we are gonna change the article titles, while the bots can do all the moving of pages we are also gonna need to drop the periods from prose mentions and I'm not sure a bot can do that. My concern is that we may need a lot of human work to change instances of "U.S." to "US" in articles. Dough4872 17:48, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: In many articles, the abbreviated form is already "US #" while the full name spelled out is "U.S. Highway/Route X", and it wouldn't actually be that hard for a bot to change all instances of "U.S." to "US" within the text of an article. Again, let's not dwell on technical issues as there are bots that can handle all of this. Imzadi 1979 →  18:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If that's the case, I don't care about what we do. We can keep the status quo or we can drop the periods from the article titles and prose mentions, I'll be fine with either option. Dough4872 18:25, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There should be no issue with a find and replace of "U.S." to "US". The only human check would be for when the dotted abbreviation is also the end of a sentence. - Floydian τ ¢ 20:18, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

text: Is that MOS discussion fairly settled now? It seems like it started by one editor being BOLD. --Rschen7754 19:12, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The change was made to the MOS page in October, and that change has been left in place at MOS:US. Imzadi 1979 →  19:46, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "U.S." vs. "US" in article titles
Talk:Lawrence Moore Cosgrave

message: "Both US and Japanese copies of the surrender are on display on the USS Missouri, berthed in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii."  I visited the Edo-Tokyo Museum in May and saw the Japanese instrument of surrender, with the mistake by Cosgrave.  I would have taken a picture, but they weren't allowed and I didn't know how to ask for special permission in Japanese. :)  There is a picture, apparently from the USS Missouri at :Commons:Image:Japanese instrument of surrender photo.jpg; it looks like what I saw in Tokyo, but I'm not sure if that's the same one I saw or a different one.  Telso 08:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The ones on the Missouri are copies. The original one signed for the allies is in the US National Archives. I don't know about the original Japanese one, but it is probably in a similar Japanese archive. The one seen in the Edo-Tokyo Museum is also a copy. 82.39.49.182 (talk) 13:45, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hawker Hind

message: I'd heard that the prototype Hurricane was just a Hind with one wing. The body retained the fabric rear section of the Hind.203.221.203.50 (talk) 04:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hurricane Protoype 
Talk:Avro Lincoln

message: "18 aircraft were rebuilt to this standard, and were reallocated new serial numbers accordingly." - I cant see any evidence that Lincolns were re-serialed and A73-59 to A73-73 were built as GRs on the production line rather then being rebuilt. MilborneOne (talk) 15:04, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: GR.31

message: The article text says: "During early 1945, the British Government immediately set about restoring the country to a peacetime stance". Surely this should be 1946? WW2 did not finish until summer 1945. 62.232.26.62 (talk) 14:38, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  1945 or 1946?
Talk:David Gottlieb (biologist)

message: Warning. It appears that Pjacobi is still continuing a mass delete of these infoboxes. Doing this in the middle of a TfD discussion is somewhat underhanded...this is because removal of the template removes the TfD announcement tag from those pages. This therefore undermines the TfD process, and hides it from those editors who did not see the pages earlier. It is tantamount to deleting the TfD tag. bunix 13:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Mobile malware

message: It would be good for the article to answer this question: Can viruses affect more basic phones? E.g. one that doesn't have bluetooth. Australian PC World, Sept 06 (p84), says that unsecured bluetooth are the most common infection route, and refer to work by Mikko Hyppoenen. 
What other infection routes are there? --Singkong2005 talk 03:50, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Can viruses affect more basic phones?

message: Anything that is valid in this article also needs to be included in the article about Computer Viruses although there may be information in that article that doesn't belong in this one.  Therefore, this article is redundant. Kernel.package (talk) 22:35, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is redundant 

message: Hi - the Cell phone virus article is largely a duplicate of this one - they should be merged together. --KarlB (talk) 18:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:BAC Strikemaster

message: Pedantic trivia, but from memory the air accident investigation found loss of part of the tail caused the airframe to exceed stress limits, leading to the crash. Winstonwolfe (talk) 08:39, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Australian crash
Talk:Hawker Siddeley Andover

message: The photo of C22 is an HS.748, not HS.780.210.185.78.52 (talk) 23:15, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I presume we are talking about the CC.2 - your are right and that is explained in the related text. MilborneOne (talk) 23:49, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errata 
Talk:Westland Wasp

message: This photo suggests the helicopter has just two non-folding blades, rather than a larger number of blades, that fold for storage.  
Did the Frigates have a hanger?
The Beartrap (helicopter device) system allowed large Sea King helicopters to land on relatively small vessels, even in bad weather.  The article says this was the first helicopter to be designed to land on Frigate sized vessels.  So, presumably it predates the beartrip system?  So, how well did these helicopters handle bad weather?
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 16:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the questions - if you look at real images (rather than an artists impression) in the article the Wasp has four blades. They had a folding tail unit and folding rotor blades. MilborneOne (talk) 22:00, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  question... 

message: How can a 1960's helicopter be called first generation? It is at least second.Royalcourtier (talk) 05:58, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The use of "generation" in most aircraft articles is probably misleading as it is not really defined, removed. MilborneOne (talk) 09:31, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  First generation
Talk:Alexander Shliapnikov

message: I have a newspaper clipping which refers to a speech Alexander Solzhenitsyn gave to the AFL-CIO where Solzhenitsyn mentions Shlyapnikov. My clipping quotes Solzhenitsyn:
: In the years before the Revolution it was Shliapnikov who ran the whole communist party in Russia--not Lenin, who was an emigre. in 1921, he headed the Workers' Opposition which was charging the Communist leadership with betraying the workers' interests . . . Shliapnikov disappeared from sight. He was arrested somewhat later and since he firmly stood his ground he was shot in prison and his name is perhaps unknown to most people . . . But I remind you: Before the Revolution the head of the Communist party of Russia was Shliapnikov--not Lenin.
I figure that Solzhenitsyn's opinion, right or wrong, is worth adding to this article. Unfortunately, I don't have a verifiable citation for this quotation. Thoughts? -- llywrch (talk) 22:10, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solzhenitsyn on Shlyapnikov 
Talk:Saint Vitus (band)

message: Stoner Metal? Really?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.139.82.61 (talk) 04:22, 6 April 2012 (UTC)