Talk:Barred spiral galaxy

message: How do you create external links on wiki? Do you just insert the "a href" html code you do for usual webpages?
*Like this: TitleofWebpage.  And by the way, the Milky Way has long been suspected to be barred.  Spitzer is just the most recent confirmation. :) --Etacar11 00:26, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: Heads up, there is a front page link to this article on slashdot right now, so expect edit traffic and vandalism to spike. - Chairboy 16:51, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Slashdot linkage

message: Arn't Sm's spiral galaxies wit a bit of irregularities, not dwarfs.  The classification for dwarf galaxies are with a "d" before it.  So the LMC and SMC should be classified as dSBm.  But isn't that funny, two barred galaxies orbiting a barred galaxy, LOL.— Hurricane Devon ( Talk ) 22:16, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typos 

message: This sentence from the page: "Studying the core of the Milky Way, scientists found out that the Milky Way's bulge was peanut-shaped. This led to the conclusion that all barred spiral galaxies have a peanut shaped bulge." should be rewritten with more examples and a better explanation of the scientific process that was used. Otherwise, one might think that a generalization was made from ONE SINGLE EXAMPLE. Hugo Dufort 04:45, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generalization from a single example? 

message: I'm just curious but would a centralized black hole or object with a high mass account for the bulge, since it seems like stars around a central black hole orbit in that sort of fashion (varying directions) which would attribute to the "Bulge" Marx01 Tell me about it 00:26, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulge 

message: The opening says approximately half of spirals are barred, whereas the first paragraph of the second section claims 2/3s.  Those are significantly different values.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.170.62.95 (talk) 16:10, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  half or two thirds? 

message: In this article written that NGC 4565 is a barred galaxy, but in article NGC 4565 - it is an unbarred galaxy. Where properly? Andrew M. Vachin (talk) 09:34, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: NED says it's unbarred  and the reference given in Barred spiral galaxy#The bulges describes the evidence for a bar as inconclusive. So in the absence of further data, we should take it as unbarred. Modest Genius talk 00:49, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NGC 4565: barred or unbarred galaxy? 

message: The first paragraph on the page is full of false information about "African American galaxies" and other racial statements. This either needs to be fixed or removed as people will find it offensive.98.233.139.69 (talk) 00:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrupted First Paragraph 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Barred spiral galaxy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.govertschilling.nl/artikelen/archief/2002/0204/020401_st.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050511074923/http://www.smv.org:80/hastings/bsmain.htm to http://www.smv.org/hastings/bsmain.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020512044348/http://www.govertschilling.nl/artikelen/archief/2002/0204/020401_st.htm to http://www.govertschilling.nl/artikelen/archief/2002/0204/020401_st.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Barred spiral galaxy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060209145355/http://www.news.wisc.edu/11405.html to http://www.news.wisc.edu/11405.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.smv.org/hastings/bsmain.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified