Talk:Sarah Connor (Terminator)

message: Is is really necessary to quote the article in calling her emaciated? She's about as emaciated as any woman with a figure like that. Furthermore, the article is only available to Los Angeles Times subscribers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.228.177.220 (talk) 06:39, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the controversy about this is relevant. It looks to have been covered by multiple major media outlets now: the LA Times, the Boston Herald, and The Guardian as well as by online blogs and communities. I'm putting it back in, with multiple sources. I also advise the people who are removing it without edit summaries to discuss it here first before doing that again. Oh, and I don't have a membership with the LA Times and the link comes up fine for me. - Kathryn NicDhàna ♫♦♫ 02:33, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lana Headly's body 

message: Shouldn't this article be moved to "Sarah Connor_(character)"?  As far as I know, whenever a character in a film/TV show/book shares a name with another person, they are always specified like this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.234.65.6 (talk) 00:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The fictional character Callisto has the article title Callisto (Xena). However, for Sarah Connor, maybe Sarah Connor (Terminator franchise) may be useful to indicate that she's in the Terminator franchise, rather than a fictional terminator herself. Andjam (talk) 13:43, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article 

message: A picture of Hamilton from the first movie would be nice, if there's something available.
—WWoods (talk) 07:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: T1 picture

message: Like I said on the Derek Reese discussion page, there is far too much plot detail here. The movie sections are fine, but the TtSCC is far too long. Look at the John Connor page. That is what we are shooting for. Concise, to the point, and only covering what is important (role on the show, personality, etc.) At the rate these pages are filling up with plot info, we're gonna have to make a separate page for their TV personas, and I know that that is never going to happen. kingdom2 (talk) 20:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Way'' too much plot detail 

message: The image :File:Connor and reese.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --17:15, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with File:Connor and reese.jpg

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episode and character, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters

message: if they did not regard T3 as canon in T4 then how come they have kate brewster  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.130.8.135 (talk) 16:44, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the films, and the TV series are canon, but they are also on different time lines.  The original film was based on a closed (and fixed) loop model, The second film made the timeline changeable, and the the TV series posits multiple versions of the future, with time travelers from more than version of the future interacting.  Is not time travel fun :-) —MJBurrage(T•C) 20:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not true

message: In a deleted scene of the episode "The Demon Hand", the first details of Sarah's childhood are revealed during a session with Dr. Peter Silberman.Deleted scenes from Fox.com (Windows Media)Terminator Files When she was seven, her father—a chronically depressed war veteranStated in narration in "The Tower is Tall But the Fall is Short"—loses his mattress factory job to a machine, which leads to dysfunction within her family and her father's subsequent abandonment of them. Her mother finds a job as a waitress. Even as a child, Sarah has an intense technophobia.  After her father leaves, Sarah stops spending her afternoons with her childhood friend whose father is an engineer with IBM. Instead, she takes to visiting the factory where her own father had worked to watch the gears and belts of the machines, knowing something is wrong with what she sees.Op sit. Deleted scenes from Fox.com (Windows Media).
The "Pilot" episode of The Sarah Connor Chronicles picks up Sarah and John on the run in 1999. Her FBI file lists her age as 33 on August 24, 1999, placing her birth date between August 25, 1965, and August 23, 1966, and making her age 17 or 18 when John was conceived in The Terminator. She claims in "Strange Things Happen at the One Two Point", whether truthfully or not, to have been 19 when John was born (around nine months later). Due to the forward time-travel jump in "Pilot", Sarah and John are now eight years younger than their birth-dates would otherwise indicate.
In the "Gnothi Seauton" episode, Cameron Phillips mentions that Sarah would have died from cancer on December 4, 2005, if they had not jumped forward in time. Cameron also mentions that John Connor sent Cameron back in time to help leap over Sarah's death. At the end of the episode, Sarah is at a doctor's office, where her forged drivers license shows her alias' birthday as February 4, 1974.
 Baffle gab1978 (talk) 03:15, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed text

message: The CN tag in the beginning of the section about the tv series. Just dropping it here real quick in case someone wants to beat me to it; no time or focus at the moment. As worded in the interview, we'd need a bit of a rewrite on that sentence.  It's not as definitive as implied by our current phrasing.
http://www.ign.com/articles/2007/06/20/guiding-the-sarah-connor-chronicles
Cheers. Millahnna (talk) 22:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible source for tv vs. film continuity 

message: The last appearance of Sarah Connor is listed as Fortnite, a video game. Fortnite is irrelevant to Sarah Connor and the Terminator franchise and the last appearance should be part of the franchise canon (i do not know what that is, just flagging the issue). Wiki mwuk (talk) 12:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Appearance: Fortnite