Talk:Rani Mukerji/Archive 3

message: Guys, let's get rolling and work hard for the next few weeks until good results are achieved. The page is unprotected and I'm removing trivia and television appearances and what not. Any comments? --shez
:*Good job, Shez.
:*I shifted awards and nominations to a seperate sub-page.
:*Cleaned up personal life and added family section into it.
:*I note that references has a sub-section Press Coverage. We don't need this section, since they are all web-links, not references to print sources. Whatever sentences in the article utilize these links, should be put in  tags. Will get to that later.
:Thats it for now, won't be making any more large changes until some more editors have a look at the page.
:Regards,xC | ☎  04:59, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ok Guys! 

message: Thare are some TV appearances like KBC and KWK which should be kept. They even have their own pages in WP. Please put it back. --Shshshsh 13:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Strongly disagree. Star appearances can be very well mentioned on the page of the show. It is unneccessary to mention that she appeared in KBC or KWK or whichever other talk show she turned up on. Regards,xC | ☎  15:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV appearances 

message: I requested a Peer Review of the article. I believe its improved a lot over the last few weeks, and suggestions for further improvement would be beneficial. Having the WP community look over the article everyone has worked so hard on is a good opportunity for us to find out what are the article's strengths and where it is lacking. To all peer reviewers, thank you for your time :)
Best regards,xC | ☎  07:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look at WP:PR. The WP community offers to review articles and make suggestions for improvement. Its done by whichever editor volunteers to have a look. Have a look at the WP:PR page for further details. Thanks xC | ☎  12:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review 

message: Hey Shshshsh, I'm fine with it. Again, some parts really need to be re-written to make a flow in the article, to make it more coherent. For that, we'll need a great writer. Anyhow, my concern for now is her name. Because as in the case for married women, wikipedia changes the name as to what the actress puts it. Like for Jaya Badhuri: it's Jaya Bachchan. And I think for Ash, we also need to change it to Bachchan soon as she has legally changed it to Bachchan a week ago. So, now it's Aishwarya Bachchan. Moving on, it should be Rani Mukerji and not Mukherjee because Mukerji is the way Rani puts it in her autographs, her movies and as per this quote: "The actress changed the English transliteration of her surname from Mukherjee to Mukerji several years ago. At the time, it was reported that she did this for numerological reasons. Recently, she has stated that numerology was not a concern; her name had been put down as Mukerji on her passport, and she wanted to be consistent." Even at the time of Kuch Kuch Hota Hai, her name was written as Rani Mukherji in the movie. I know with a ‘h’ but then with her passport, it has been Mukerji since ‘Hum Tum’. Although, Karan Johar, for some reason puts her name as Mukherji even in K3G, Kal Ho Naa Ho and KANK. I guess it’s due to KKHH and he just wants to keep her name consistent to the one put in his first movie. However, every other film puts it as Mukerji, even Baabul. Though, for some reason, there was a typo error on the Baabul poster. I guess it’s because the ‘Mukherjee’ name is common in India and that’s how they spell it, so some people just don’t check or care about spelling and just put it as Mukherjee, the way it is conceived. Mukherjee was used in HDJPK and KPNH and PDHH. But to my knowledge, it has been Mukherji in most of her movies like Nayak, BISKH, etc. And since Hum Tum (2004), she has used Mukerji with the exception of KANK. I think Mukherjee can be put as her real name in the info box but Mukerji is what the actress prefers to use and it is how her movies are keeping it. Therefore, we’ll definitely need to move the page to Mukerji as per most wikipedia articles in other languages. And if possible we can turn fr:Rani Mukherjee into Rani Mukerji. What say? --User:shez_15
:Support move to Mukerji, as per this. Also, I think Mukherjee can be put as her real name in the info box  - theres no need for that, all Mukherjee should be changed to Mukerji. As she has legally changed her name, that is her real name now. xC | ☎  01:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We'll just need another one or two editors to agree as well, so that there are more than 2 editors involved in this. Since she has stated her name change herself, this is an uncontroversial move. So there shouldn't be any problem regarding this. xC | ☎  02:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes of course, it was always weird to me. Almost All of her last films films, interviews, sites, magazines, TV shows use this name and I support to use the previous name only in the infobox. Fine, so her name will be moved to Rani Mukerji.--Shshshsh 12:56, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name