Talk:29 Commando Regiment Royal Artillery

message: I'm intending on migrating some of the 148 Battery material across, with regard to training.
If anyone has corresponding material on the REME workshop that would be useful.ALR 14:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have just completed the B class checklist and believe that the article could be improved by addressing the following issues:
* referencing: in line citations - at least one per paragraph for B class;
* coverage: a history section could be included, current operations, COs, etc;
* supporting materials: images and or an infobox.
Just some ideas. Hope this helps. AustralianRupert (talk) 01:48, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for improvement

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 29th Commando Regiment Royal Artillery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140829015853/http://army.mod.uk/artillery/regiments/31246.aspx to http://www.army.mod.uk/artillery/regiments/31246.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:31, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved.  UtherSRG (talk) 19:39, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 29th Commando Regiment Royal Artillery →  – The title "29th" is not used - see the Royal Navy website here: []. "29 Commando" is the most commonly used name. I believe this is uncontroversial - we just have the redirect and the page the wrong way round.  The naming of regiments etc between the Nth and the N is reasonably random, so there are no wider implications for other articles. Please see also the following: Google ngram [] and compare google searches for the two potential titles: "29 Commando Regiment Royal Artillery" 33k results; "29th Commando Regiment Royal Artillery" gets under 2k results. Springnuts (talk) 21:18, 30 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Ah, perhaps I wasn't clear. I was suggesting making an RM for moving all of them at once. If you need help, I can assist in setting that up later tonight. UtherSRG (talk) 01:17, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a comms fail - it happens!  I'm not aware of problems with any other regiments' entries. Springnuts (talk) 13:08, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look at :Category:Royal_Artillery_regiments. The majority of the numbered articles use the ordinal form, vice the cardinal form. Like I said, I think you are right in making the move, but this moves away from WP:CONSISTENT, so the right thing to do is more than just moving this article. UtherSRG (talk) 14:15, 31 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Just to be sure, please check them. It will be easier to move a group all at once, than to have to go through this each time. UtherSRG (talk) 23:37, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not the best person to do this.  Do we have Wikipedia Project Artillery or something?  I suspect someone somewhere already knows! In the meantime might we not simply correct this one?   Springnuts (talk) 20:38, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 December 2022