lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Spyware removal

message: Which one is the Best?
There seems to be no way of adding to this list Kazzaabegone should be added
As should be Lavasoft Adaware. Aska 09:30, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The way to add an item to this list is to create a separate article on a particular piece of software and then place it in this category by including Category:Spyware removal at the bottom of that new article. However, most individual removal programs will not be sufficiently notable to merit their own article. Instead that information should be incorporated into existing articles. JonHarder 14:19, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would like to request that the Spyware Terminator article be unlocked and created.
It is one of the most popular antispyware programs.
Here are some references:
*http://www.spywareterminator.com/
*http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2167808,00.asp
*http://malware.wikia.com/wiki/Spyware_Terminator
*http://computersecurity.wikia.com/wiki/Spyware_Terminator
*http://download.cnet.com/Spyware-Terminator/3000-8022_4-10468541.html
*http://www.v3.co.uk/vnunet/downloads/2165712/spyware-terminator
*http://www.net-security.org/review.php?id=160
*http://www.softpedia.com/developer/Crawler-LLC-11279.html
*http://shareware.pcmag.com/free/Email-Anti-Spam-Related/Spyware-Terminator/93057.html
*http://www.mrtech.com/forums/index.php/topic,1751.0.html?theme=33
*http://www.downloadtopc.com/get/120/17267/AdSpyware_Terminator.html
*http://wakoopa.com/software/spyware-terminator
*http://www.techspot.com/downloads/4264-spyware-terminator.html
*http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/downloads/index.cfm?categoryID=1444&itemID=64132
*http://www.net-security.org/software.php?id=681
*http://www.downloadsquad.com/tag/spyware+terminator/
*http://www.spychecker.com/program/spywareterminator.html
*http://spyware-terminator.software.informer.com/1.9/
SJSF (talk) 20:25, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for [[Spyware Terminator]]
Talk:List of All-Star First-Team NHL hockey players

message: ----
Is this list complete? It seems awfully short. Masterhatch 14:58, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

message: I think this article needs to be either renamed or split into two separate articles.  It includes NHL All-Star game appearances as well as NHL First Team All-Star selections, whereas the name of the article only indicates First Team selections.  (Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 05:37, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Split or deleted. The lists of leaders could be added to the All-Star game and NHL All-Star Team articles.--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 09:02, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the list of All-Star Game leaders from this article to the NHL All-Star Game article on May 13, 2008, but this article still makes no sense.  It is named as a list, but only consists of the all-time leaders.  Also, if the contents actually were appropriate, it should be named "List of NHL First Team All-Stars" rather than what it is now.  I have moved the contents from this article to the NHL All-Star Team article and replaced it with a redirect. Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 02:56, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rename/split up
Talk:Database transaction schedule

message: In the "Venn diagram" section:
:Serial ⊂ conflict-serializable ⊂ view-serializable ⊂ all schedules 
:Serial ⊂ strict ⊂ avoids vascading aborts ⊂ recoverable ⊂ all schedules 
What is "strict"?
-Dan 15:06, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Can this article be renamed "Schedule (Databases)" to not be mixed up in "Scheduling (Computer science)"?
Mange01 20:49, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming?

message: It should probably be "Transactions can be commited only after all transactions whose changes they read or overwrite commit."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.194.247.92 (talk) 22:07, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recoverable schedule

message: This article lacks references. The only book I know is Database Systems and Concepts 4th Edition.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.180.9.58 (talk) 18:55, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: There is a link with the text "DBMS" (acronym for database management system i assume), and it links to wiki/database. I'm no db expert but i suspect DBMS!=DB. I see wiki/dbms exists in some other languages (http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Databasemanagementsysteem), but not in English. Perhaps en.wiki[...]/dbms should be created? Or perhaps a subsection in the en.wiki[...]/database would do.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.101.25.159 (talk) 10:12, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  DBMS 

message: The neutrality of part of this page is disputed, as part of a wider discussion. See Talk:Commitment ordering and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer science#User:Comps / Commitment ordering. —Ruud 14:31, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commitment ordering
Talk:Index of international trade articles

message: move them Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Index of statistics articles → List of statistics articles — Most lists are called "List of -".  There are probably other pages that start with "Index of -".  This is to standardize articles and naming. 174.3.98.236 (talk) 11:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Index of economics articles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Index of conservation articles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Index of statistics articles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Index of international trade articles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Lymphoma

message: The alignment of Ref 34 is different … there doesn't seem to be any need for the indent - but I'm unable to correct it.
Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 05:21, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: One of the many things I was wondering about lymphoma is whether it develops from mature lymphocytes, immature lymphocytes, or lymphocyte precursors; or from different cells in different types of lymphoma.  The article doesn't seem to settle that, after the opening sentence.  So I took a look at the source.  The part that can be read for free doesn't seem to say.  I hope someone who knows enough, and has good enough access to reliable sources, will add more information about the underlying biology of lymphomas. --Dan Wylie-Sears 2 (talk) 18:38, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is first sentence of lead correct? 

message: Currently, the lede says that 10% of all lymphoma are Hodgkins Lymphoma, but under Classification it says that 15% are.  Somebody who knows far more than I do needs to correct whichever one of these is wrong.  JDZeff (talk) 07:51, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction in article
Talk:Transport Neutral Encapsulation Format

message: I've tried using the TNEF decoder from http://sourceforge.net/projects/tnef/ and found it doesn't like the winmail.dat files (that I've been sent). I conclude this is because it's designed to read TNEF rather than specifically winmail.dat files. I also tried the decoder from http://ytnef.sourceforge.net/ and found it could successuflly read all the winmail.dat files (that I've been sent). It seems this latter one has been designed specifically to read winmail.dat.
I've made a minor change to the article to reflect this, however I'd like someone with more knowledge in this subject to upgrade the article.
Astrolox 11:33, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TNEF Decoders (on non-windows) 

message: It is stated in the article that gmail reads TNEF. This did not work in gmail for me and I can also find no reference on the web that gmail can read TNEF (e.g. http://mail.google.com/support/).
I will delete this statement if noone objects Xtothel (talk) 19:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It worked today for me in a test. jhawkinson (talk) 02:32, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gmail does not read TNEF
Talk:Fjellstrand skole

message: More content required if you want to avoid deletion. Dahliarose 12:15, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: You need to tell us more about the school and why it is notable and include some references. Pics would also help and an infobox. Dahliarose 12:15, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Hinduism in Southeast Asia

message: What does a Khmer Brahmin look like?. Does anybody know more about this? Komitsuki (talk) 15:17, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Khmer Brahmin> 
Template talk:USGS gazetteer

message: I'm planning to use this template on descriptions of Antarctic features, from the gazetteer available at http://geonames.usgs.gov/stategaz/ . I assume that this gazetteer is public domain, as a work of the US government. Eugene van der Pijll 16:46, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This template seems to be broken- it gives a weird web citation. Lurker (said · done) 11:12, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made an attempt at a fix. Lurker (said · done) 11:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Most uses of it need "|sourceURL=<optional name>".  nnn can be found in the Antarctic search at http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic. Finavon (talk) 13:58, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: now changed to "|id=nnn|name=<required name>". It would be good if the name attribute could default to the pagename. I will stop editing pages using this template until I know it is stable. Although probably not in use, the template also had access to the rest of the US GNIS (ie non-Antarctic); presumably that would no longer work. Finavon (talk) 15:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Problem: Substitution of the id parameter is broken: instead of ending with the id (e.g. http://geonames.usgs.gov/pls/gnispublic/f?p=gnispq:5:::NO::P5_ANTAR_ID:15753) the URL ends with P5_ANTAR_ID:. The links on Commonwealth Glacier and Mount Ulla are examples. Not sure whether the bug is in this template or  which this uses.
Tentative solution: Remove id= from the template, so the id parameter to gnis3 is unnamed (e.g.  which seems to work (e.g. ) rather than , which doesn't (e.g. ).
Pointillist (talk) 15:49, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: done. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 19:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Pointillist, 29 October 2010 

message: Please change from the form

into the form 

Thank you! Jeblad (talk) 12:33, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Izno (talk) 12:55, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use Wikidata
Talk:List of Romantic composers

message: I think the description that Brahms music is more conservative than Wagner/Liszt not true. With Mendelssohn or Schumann the case is clear but Brahms? In my opinion his symphonies share more with Bruckners symphonies than many Wagner works do (and certainly not his symphonies). 
Also Arnold Schönberg wrote an essay about Brahms the progressive. --Tensorproduct (talk) 15:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know that it's really up for debate that Brahms is more progressive than Wagner and Liszt, but rather the uncertainty lies in whether he is independently progressive or conservative overall. However, the distinction is murky and to your point, may not be the full story. I've changed it to Schumann. Aza24 (talk) 04:43, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  You have changed Mendelssohn into Schumann. Was that intentional? Well yes it is up to debate who was more progressive but saying Brahms was conservative is also not true. He continued where the more conservatives stopped but he certainly developed a unique new style.  --Tensorproduct (talk) 00:25, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, definitely not intentional! Fixed now. But yes, Brahms is certainly unique. Aza24 (talk) 04:36, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brahms - the conservative? 

message: The composer of roman period 124.105.176.191 (talk) 10:24, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mapeh
Talk:King Django

message: i understand the need for verifiability and sources here at wikipedia, but i'm having difficulty finding a complete discography for King Django other than the one listed on his website.  artistdirect.com lists about 25 different recordings he has appeared on, and others are referenced at the music.com sites; rockmusiclist.com has everything on there, but searching through it takes some time.  that's the best i've been able to do in a short amount of time.  if it isn't good enough i can continue looking.  --Heah (talk) 16:50, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Pioneer 1

message: I have re-rated this article as spaceflight-importance=Mid (rather than Low) because the flight was the first launch by NASA, a space agency which went on to become quite important in the history of spaceflight. (sdsds - talk) 03:14, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spaceflight importance 

message: I note this entire article is essentially a copy of the NASA history file in reference 2, which may satisfy the "refimprove" box suggesting additional citations.  I added that Ramo-Wooldridge "fabricated" the spacecraft, but that dramatically understates their role on both the payload and launch vehicle per reference 3. Overjive (talk) 20:19, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source material and TRW info 

message: NASA did not have much to do with the launch at all.  They may have contributed the paint to put the letters "NASA" on the Able upper stage. :)
(I am the writer of the Quest article cited as 3.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Neopeius (talk • contribs) 23:16, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not much NASA at all 

message: Article not clear if there was a third stage solid rocket (that did fire ?), as well as the probe internal solid rocket (that did not fire). ...
Reference 3 seems to say it had an X248 3rd stage rocket, and the probe internal rocket was to decelerate the probe into lunar orbit. - Rod57 (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was third stage - did it fire 

message: Did the first stage perform nominally, and was the error just in 2nd stage guidance and timing ? Was the 2nd stage bumping the 3rd stage an essential or contributing factor to the failure ? - Rod57 (talk) 08:59, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which stages misbehaved 

message: The sentence The third stage was a solid-propellant unit based on Vanguard design, rated at 116,500 lb (52,844 kg)-sec total impulse. refers. What does the -sec refers to? Time? It does not make sense. Oesjaar (talk) 17:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It makes perfect sense to those who understand engineering physics. The parameter impulse (physics) is equal to the product of a force (in this case thrust) times time. Units of impulse are lb-sec or kg-sec. The word impulse should be wikilinked to make it more accessible. 21:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please explain.
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-09-26/In the news

message: I don't see any reference to Wikipedia in the AP article on Cindy Sheehan. Babajobu 16:59, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this was in a prior version...the problem with internet news is that it's often updated, and newspapers usually don't keep the old versions of articles.  Ral315 WS 20:32, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

message: The external link given for The Inquirer actually goes to the same Sydney Morning Herald page as the following link. I don't know the correct Inquirer link myself, but hopefully someone else does. Loganberry (Talk) 03:35, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed now, thanks for telling us.  Ral315 WS 03:51, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Inquirer / Simon Wiesenthal
Talk:Viaccess

message: Is there a reason why there is no exact algorithms posted in the article? I have looked around on the internet without finding any clues how the system(s) accually work. Are they secret? If so that should be mentioned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacco77 (talk • contribs) 22:03, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algorithm 

message: It must be possible to somehow get the signals stored at a harddrive. And then by comparing not decoded mpeg4 signals with decoded signal of the same MUX,channel an time/programme. And through f.i. a hexeditor try to notice the differencies. The algoritms can then be discovered. I gather that the clue is finding the ramdomize value fast. The number of different algoritms is limited if the cryptation works like common 32,64,128 or 256 bit cryptation. But forget a general card that works. But with pure computer help a software could be reversed-engeneered. Both the HD and SD standard will be DVB-T2 and MPEG4. 
After the computer the signal be watched at a television set. The computer screeen is needed just to analyze the signals.
For userof such a programme no digital box or card will be necessary. Just a fast computer whith digital TV-in and out cards
(the graphic card is of no help in this kind of solution) but the reversed-engeneered programme ought to be "naked" (meaning no operative system is needed - to gain maximum CPU speed). NOTHING digital can be concidered as full-proof safe.
What is needed (for a the developement of such a programme which includes a simple OS) is "only" a really fast mathematical CPU, supreme knowlidge of low-level programming and mathematics - and patience.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.249.42.164 (talk) 16:16, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  General cracking way
Talk:Rookwood Cemetery

message: I don't get it. If this place is 'officially named Rookwood Necropolis' - and, yes, it is - why is there a redirect page pointing away from 'rookwood necropolis'? Shouldn't the rookwood cemetery page be moved over there and the redirect removed?
Matthew king 17:03, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rookwood Cemtery? 

message: Given that Rookwood Cemetry is not an official name ("officially named The Necropolis ..."), should this article be moved to Rookwood cemetry in accordance with Manual of Style (headings)? Garrie 01:17, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Is that railway station in the old photo still in existence? Where did it stand if its no longer there? Was the structure at 33°52'10.93"S 151° 3'4.45"E one of them? If you look north of it and over by the railroad tracks, you can see where tracks led into the cemetery. Nothing has been put on the old 'road' besides maybe four new mausoleums at 33°52'2.59"S 151° 3'5.47"E The road curves and puts to the northwest, and we see the old siding that now dead-ends at 33°51'52.65"S 151° 2'55.94"E --Ragemanchoo (talk) 11:36, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Haslem's Creek Cemetery Station?
Talk:List of SFTP server software

message: I think this is a bit confusing in relation to the page Sftp which basically says that SFTP can be one of three different things. But, this page is saying that it is one of those three and then provides a link which says SFTP but points to SSH_file_transfer_protocol. This seems a bit confusing to me. 
I think this page should be more clear about which of the SFTP protocals it is refering to and the link should have the text SSH file transfer protocol.
I am going to make the link text edit myself... my first Wikipedia edit :-)
I won't make the other change (saying exactly which of the three protocols we are talking about) because I am not sure I know which is the right one.
--DAF
:I'm not generally against your change, but:
:*Any abbreviation has several meaning, that does not mean that we cannot use them. We should just link them to their proper meaning for particular context. What was done here.
:*There is lot of similar pages, like List of FTP clients, List of SFTP clients, with the same problem you see here. If you really mean it, you should "expand" the abbreviations everywhere.
:*BTW, if your link exactly matches page, you do not have to duplicate the link and the title: SSH file transfer protocol
:--Prikryl 13:22, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

message: I've removed the link to FileZilla, as it does NOT support SFTP. See: http://filezilla.sourceforge.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=3550 195.228.39.215 15:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FileZilla 

message: I see that we have a lot of red links and ext links on the entries. I think these should be purged. Any objections? --DanielRigal (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links and ext links 

message: Actually, it's the industry that's in a mess. SFTP is a really bad abbreviaton to use without disambiguation. I propose that we bin this page and include the information (which it mostly already is) in the Comparison_of_FTP_server_software page. Since Simple FTP is rather different, there is a case for having a separate "List of Simple FTP server software" page.
Alternatively, we could split this page into three: either three new pages plus this one as a disambiguation page, or three clear sections on this page...
:List of SSH FTP server software (sftp)
:List of Simple FTP server software
:List of FTP over SSH server software (ftps)
This second option seems like hard work for little gain...
Kim SJ (talk) 00:43, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is a mess 

message: I can't help but notice that this list is missing 2 important pieces of software: WinSSHD and NULL Ftp Server .  I'll try adding them to the page.
djangofan (talk) 21:37, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing software from the list
Talk:Melodrama

message: Hello everyone!
The film section has been flagged as being written like an essay, and while the content within it is solid, I think it could do with some rewording to keep it away from the essay style. I also think it could be benefitted by some sectioning within the section to break it up and improve readability. I was considering the inclusion of a “Controversy over term” section or something to that end, but I have yet to decide on the exact process of that implementation. I intend to carry out these edits in the next few weeks, and will workshop them on my own end so things shouldn’t be too incremental in the meantime. Just wanted to say hi and inform of my intentions, please feel free if you have any recommendations or if you object to these proposed edits. Thanks! GooglyEyedRock (talk) 17:31, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi everyone, I carried out the revision of the film section. I undertook heavy reworking of the section to revise its previous essay-like tone, and created the "Feminism in film melodrama" and "Notable melodramatic films" subsections to improve readability. I also managed the deletion of redundant (covered earlier in general definition of melodrama) and heavily opinionated sections with little relevance to the encyclopedic nature of Wikipedia. If someone comes by here, could they review the section to make sure it doesn't sound like an essay anymore and possibly remove the tag if so? Thanks!  GooglyEyedRock (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planned Revision of the Film Section