lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:.nl

message: http://www.iana.org/root-whois/us.htm and http://www.iana.org/root-whois/uk.htm appear to have existed since 1985, .nl was 1986? --66.102.80.239 23:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, the text says that it was the first ccTLD to be ever registered, that could be true even though .us and .uk were 'introduced' earlier. Uhro87 (talk) 21:12, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The .uk domain is not a ccTLD according to  since it required all ccTLDs to use the ISO-3166 country codes, according to ISO-3166 the correct ccTLD for the United Kingdom is .gb. .gb was also introduced before .nl but can no longer be registered, so that makes .nl the first non-US ccTLD in active use that completely complies to . Armada651 (talk) 11:32, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The SIDN site states "Daarmee was .nl het eerste actieve landendomein buiten de Verenigde Staten. " Which means Armada651 is right and .nl was the first active non-US ccTLD.94.210.188.233 (talk) 08:58, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is .nl the first ccTLD? 

message: Removed the .co.nl link from external links as it has no mention in the article and .co.nl is not an official extension.  It is a sub-domain operated by EuroDNS, so the link can be considered spam.
See:
http://www.sidn.nl/ace.php/c,728,5927
http://domain.co.nl/en/co.nl-.nl-faq.html
NP20 (talk) 18:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  co.nl
Talk:BALB/c

message: Is it for Bailey ALBino? Does anyone know this?157.182.105.1 (talk) 14:40, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does the name stand for? 

message: 1/15/17 DennisPietras (talk) 02:31, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved out of unassessed on the genetics project 
Talk:Animal testing on rodents

message: I'm no expert in the use of rats in animal testing, but it seems that the Brown Rat article has information that can be worked into this one. Specifically, this section. Ben Hocking (talk|contribs) 22:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rats 

message: For anyone thinking of writing about rabbits here, please remember they are not rodents, i.e. they might not be in the scope of this article.DrChrissy (talk) 12:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like to back this point. Rabbits should not be a section, it should be removed. London prophet (talk) 14:17, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rabbits are not rodents 
Talk:Animal testing on invertebrates

message: The article as it stands assumes the abuse of small creatures for the advancement of human careers and profit is a good thing, and fails to take account of any ethical objections.Andycjp (talk) 11:59, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is ethical to use flies and worms for testing, because they feel no pain. I reject only the cruel testing on vertebrates (and advanced invertebrates like e.g. some species of squid), because these have an advanced nervous system and can actually feel something. Btw, what do you think of abortion? There are some similarities between these two issues: Human fetuses are also small creatures who can feel something if they are advanced enough (IIRC after the 3rd month). I think with today's technology it is possible to remove a fetus without killing it, hence allowing the transfer to another person or to a neonatal intensive care unit. Der Eberswalder (talk) 02:32, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Until anyone notes any potential ethical objections, I'm removing the POV tag.  If no significant objections exist, there is no point in noting any in the article.Dreid1987 (talk) 22:48, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is any established literature on the ethical issues regarding testing on invertebrates, I'd love to see some citations, as that certainly belongs in the article. This is one of the reasons I had a look at this article. However, based upon my searching around Google, however, there isn't a whole lot of literature of this kind out there, and we cannot "balance" an article based merely on the personal perspectives of Wikipedia editors. Peter G Werner (talk) 22:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: November 2008
Talk:Animal testing on frogs

message: As much a reminder to myself to get back to this - frogs are *the* model muscle for all organisms, and basically everything we know about muscle comes from frogs. Mokele (talk) 18:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muscles 
Talk:Andrew Molera Falls

message: talk about merge
I think we should merge because unless there can be sime assertion of notability for the waterfall itself, then it doesn't need its own article. --Onceonthisisland 17:45, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thabk you. I do too. •smedleyΔbutler• 18:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed also. Gordonofcartoon 03:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tianjin Nankai High School

message: There is frequent confusion over the fact that East Asian and North American school systems are not structured the same way.  In the United States:  
* Grades 1 through 4 are known as "Elementary School".  
* Grades 4 through 8 are known as either "Middle School" or "Junior High School".  
* Grades 8 through 12 are known as "High School".  
In all East Asian school systems, including China, Japan, and Korea:  
* Grades 1 through 6 are known as "Primary School" 小學 (Xiǎo xué, 小学).  
* Grades 6 through 12 are known as "Secondary School" 中學 (Zhōng xué, 中学).  
* Secondary School is frequently divided into "Junior Secondary School" 初級中學 (Chū jí Zhōng xué, 初级中学) for grades 6 through 9, and "Senior Secondary School" 高級中學 (Gāo jí Zhōng xué, 高级中学) for grades 10 through 12.  The abbreviations Chū Zhōng 初中 and Gāo Zhōng 高中 are also commonly used.  
This is why the English equivalent of Zhōng Xué 中學 or Gāo Zhōng 高中 is a "High School".  So, this article on Nankai High School in Tianjin 南開中學 is titled correctly, but the article on Nankai High School in Chongqing 重庆南开中学 is mislabeled and should eventually be moved.
::::::::::::  Winston Ho  何嶸  (2007 Sep. 27, Thursday).  
::::::::::::  user:winstonho0805  —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 07:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:What Now (TV programme)

message: The 'Get Out of your Lazy Bed' song was not released until 1984, so it can't have been the original title song, if the show did start in 1981 as the article currently claims.
It definitely was the title song in 1984 though (when Danny, Michele and Frank were the presenters) -- I remember it well. (I don't have any memories of the show pre-1984).
-- Matt, 23:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Get Out of Your Lazy Bed

message: Propsboy never actually revealed himself on the program... Can his identity be cited or something?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Urgeblind (talk • contribs) 05:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mike Carpinter? 

message: The "Afternoon What Now" was not an Afternoon What Now, it is called "WN TV" (As opposed to What Now TV) and it was never supposed to be perceived as an Afternoon What Now, but a different show. Source's, my father use to Work on What Now when it was in Lower Hutt, which generally included me sitting in the control room every week. =D  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.97.212.114 (talk) 01:28, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afternoon What Now
Talk:Affiliated High School of Peking University

message: Article needs a complete rewrite. Wiki links need to be added and references would help considerably. A higher importance rating might well be merited if you can tell us more about the school? Do you have any distinguished alumni? Dahliarose 23:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure if this article can meet the requirement of a higher importance rating. It will be appreciated if you could review the article as it stands now. Davidw017 (talk) 16:29, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: The article is still being re-written. I think it should be OK to copyedit at a relatively small scale but please keep the general structure of the article unchanged before its completion. Thanks. Davidw017 (talk) 16:26, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Woman, I think it's time for you to update this article now. MrSeaman (talk) 07:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: what remains needed, is information about the curriculum, and a list of all notable alumni that can be identified who have articles in Wikipedia.) It is also common for articles on high schools to contain statistics on college entrance and examination results; there should certainly be exact figures for number of students, total staff, and instructional staff--Ideally, giving some from earlier periods in the history as well as the present.  DGG ( talk ) 05:33, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Talk:Lock (firearm)

message: by what is the safety sear deactivated?  a.  the locking block; b.  the back of the bolt;  c.  the trigger;  d.  the link
Thank you,
Gary Ayres  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5B0:42C2:8848:DC05:1AF7:3B31:7993 (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  shotguns
Talk:Milicia excelsa

message: I made some changes to the formatting of a couple sentences, added some description of inbreeding depression, and fixed any grammatical errors I found in the article. There are a couple concepts mentioned that you might want to add further information about. Agroforestry is mentioned in the Importance to Environment section as a possible method to conserve the species, but there was never a description of what agroforestry actually is. It is mentioned at the end of the Uses section that leaves and ashes also have medicinal uses but these uses are never elaborated on, consider adding a description of what those uses are possibly. Also one of the last sentences about how gall mites can attack this species could use some elaboration, maybe a description on how the gall mite is harmful to the tree, and how big of a problem this actually is with respect the the decline of the species. Another suggestion is that maybe a new section specifically about conservation could be added. There is a lot of information throughout the article about the species importance to the environment, its many uses, its decline in population due to isolation and possibly gall mites, and an approach that could be used to conserve it. This information could possibly be consolidated under one section. AnonARK25 (talk) 20:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions
Talk:Course (architecture)

message: Could anyone elaborate on what a broken course would be? Perhaps it coule be useful to include in this article.--Ducio1234 (talk) 01:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken Course

message: Campanile:  there are 2 more:  sailor and shiner courses.  Rarely used, but how about adding them to your diagram and providing a caption for completeness.  Thanks.  Newell Post 23:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sailor and Shiner Courses

message: A nice little stub - has anyone seen Brickwork or Brick - I know courses don't have to be brick, but it might be nice to get some links from there to here, and/or incorporate more ideas of stone courses to justify the existence of this separate article. Perhaps a mention of 'band' courses with dentil or saw-tooth details? --Joopercoopers (talk) 15:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, its been over six years since you wrote this comment and the page has expanded, but your point remains relevant. Bangabandhu (talk) 04:20, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: right
Rowlock – A course with the long dimension parallel to the wall and the small face looking outward.
This doesn't make sense. The long dimension parallel to the wall describes a stretcher, a shiner, a soldier or a sailor, but not a rowlock. The small face looking outward describes either a header or a rowlock. In other words, both can't apply at the same time. For a rowlock the long dimension is in fact perpendicular to the face of the wall, but that is also true of a header. In fact the descriptions of all six orientations are difficult to visualise and the perspective drawing is too small. A much better picture is File:Brickpositions.PNG as used in the Brickwork article and on the right. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 16:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rowlock description
Talk:Idols South Africa

message: what season is this caus all the jugdes are still there and going strong. is this a mistake on wikipedias part is it a season delayed? wats up please clarify...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.10.121.2 (talk) 07:17, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  confused as well 

message: Was there only one season? Bezuidenhout (talk) 11:19, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afrikaans Idol 
Talk:Shanghai Foreign Language School

message: A good start. A lot of work is still needed to wikify the article and improve the English. A higher importance rating might well be justified with the addition of more material and more famous alumni. Dahliarose 23:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: I was shocked when I saw this...first established as early as 2007...who did that？？
Still don't know if there are other contributors in the school now...always hoping to find you all...
Simon YifanLing, Class 1, Class of 2020(10th grade as of April 2018),willing to know you all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simon YifanLing SFLS Shanghai (talk • contribs) 13:51, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shocked 
Talk:Hangzhou Xuejun High School

message: ---------
i will not add pinyin reading to Chinese symbols on this page 
because when i do i'm blamed in vandalizing the article
http://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=Appendix:HSK_list_of_Mandarin_words/Beginning_Mandarin&action=history  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.233.129.146 (talk) 09:21, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Tsinghua University High School

message: Work start from May.12 2011. I am an alumni of the school, and a child of faculty member of Tsinghua, what I am doing is pretty much re-tell the stories I heard. If it violates with the 'no original research' principle, please contact me and let's discuss how to work it out. Oceangai (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 12:23, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite of the article
Talk:List of programs broadcast by YTV

message: *Loupan was the name of a fictional character. A Young boy and woman reporter. Two cop looking for him and a corporate white-collar criminal--Brown Shoes22 (talk) 17:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just in case you still don't have the answer, you're referring to Night Hood. --Fifthship (talk) 03:56, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Show on YTV a recall. But can't recall the name? 

message: So, does anyone have any info as to when Every Witch Way will premiere on YTV. 'Cause if not, somebody's committing vandalism.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarcoPolo250 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming programming 

message: If something is removed from the page we should note it here on the talk to see if it belongs or not.
*https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=676420624
**Almost Naked Animals
**Kid vs. Kat
**Scaredy Squirrel
**Sidekick
I know all 4 of these have aired. Being in reruns may mean we should not list them as "current" but they are not "former" either since they are actively airing old episodes instead of being cancelled altogether. 
This has happened before:
*Special:Diff/667335046
I think if someone is going to remove a series from a current or rerun section they have a responsibility to add it to "former" to keep it on the page.
If they do not do this, it is the same as removing it from former and is like unexplained blanking or vandalism. 64.228.90.1 (talk) 18:42, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed things

message: I have seen no press releases or news that Gaming Show (In My Parents' Garage) is moving from Family Channel to YTV. I actually wish Wikipedia was bought out so they someone can hire editors who actually cite their sources instead of relying of fanboys and amateurs who are constantly posting random nonsense. MarcoPolo250 (talk) 21:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Channel shows on YTV 

message: Specials is one thing, but listing movies that have aired is WP:LISTCRUFT and unnecessary.  I don't see any reason to keep a list of movies aired.  No other lists with programming for networks have such a thing.  Why have it for this network?  Seems redundant and will never be complete as movies have been shown on YTV for decades.  Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 16:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listing Movies 

message: I think we should start adding years for shows that aired on YTV as Disney Junior, Disney Channel, Disney XD, and Treehouse already have the years.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.98.57.43 (talk) 02:10, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years for shows 

message: DO NOT list shows without citing your sources, and do not assume that every Nickelodeon show will automatically air on YTV. Thecleanerand (talk) 00:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice About Upcoming Shows
Talk:Psilocybe caerulipes

message: The first sentence of the article seems to give an outdated Taxonomy, giving the family as  Strophariaceae, rather than Hymenogastraceae. However, I don't know enough about mushrooms to verify this. Can somebody look into this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:6D0:33A0:D5DF:677E:27B7:CCAD (talk) 07:26, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, with reference.   
Alan Rockefeller (Talk - contribs) 19:56, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family error?
Talk:Trapped in the Closet 13-22

message: I cited Urban Dictionary for a meaning for the slang term "Package" that comes into play at the end of episodes 13-22. I understand that Urban Dictionary contains user created content, but given that Package is a slang term, I feel this is an acceptable source for the material. If others find a better source or object to the citation, I am open to formatting episode 22's synopsis in a different fashion.
Marty Donakowski 00:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Package
Talk:Float (woodworking)

message: -- 84.143.135.209 00:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article could be renamed to “[[Float (woodworking)]]” 

message: Not all floats are tapered.  Not all floats are intended for, nor suitable for, plane makers.  Also rasps can be sharpened (not sure why that falsehood is on the float page). They can be sharpened chemically (e.g. using hydrochloric acid, carefully).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.68.66 (talk) 20:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This short article is disappointingly inaccurate 

message: I saw  on Wikimedia Commons, is it a float? If so it'd be great to add it to the article. LittleDwangs (talk) 17:25, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this photo a float?
File talk:World Monarchies.png

message: Here is the correct version: http://keep4u.ru/full/2009/04/15/6bfe4fe03634c24bf2b4c90fb1566eb3/jpg
:I don't think so. Any particular "mistakes" you've corrected? kwami (talk) 22:54, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update and correction of outright mistakes. 

message: I think this should be coloured as subnational monarchies.--79.111.107.139 (talk) 00:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: United Arab Emirates
Talk:4-HO-MET

message: Should the article title not be 'Metocin' and simply redirected from 4-HO-MET? Because the article on Psilocin lists it as just that,'Psilocin' but is redirected from 4-HO-DMT.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.5.90 (talk) 22:57, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title
Talk:United States bankruptcy court

message: As currently written, the article states:
::The current system of bankruptcy courts was created by United States Congress in 1978, effective April 1, 1984. [citation in the article to various provisions of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978]
That statement is technically correct, but it has to be understood with the emphasis on the phrase "current system." The bankruptcy courts did exist in some form before the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978. Even prior to April 1, 1984, there were bankruptcy "referees" and bankruptcy courts.
Regarding the changes made by the 1978 Reform Act, here's an excerpt from a history written by U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert J. Kressel of Minnesota:
::Starting in 1979, change came rapidly. The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 totally reorganized the method for handling bankruptcy cases. Effective October 1, 1979, a separate United States bankruptcy court was created for each judicial district. A transition period from October 1, 1979, through March 31, 1984, was designated, during which time the United States bankruptcy courts were "departments" of their respective United States district courts and bankruptcy judges would continue to be appointed by the district court. At the end of this transition period, the bankruptcy courts would become "adjuncts" to the district courts and bankruptcy judges would be appointed by the President for terms of fourteen years. The Bankruptcy Reform Act also created, for the first time, the position of clerk of bankruptcy court.
--from .
Maybe we can work some more of the history of the bankruptcy courts into the article later..... Famspear (talk) 00:51, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: History of the bankruptcy courts
Talk:Canada men's national basketball team

message: I am watching USA beat Canada in the FIBA Americas tournament right now and strangly Canada is wearing blue. The uniforms listed in this article are white and red. The uniform data in the article needs to be changed. --Jon in California 25 August 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.73.82 (talk) 19:37, August 25, 2007 (UTC) 
:I think it's black? I'll edit it anyway... --Howard the Duck 05:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniform

message: I have assessed this as a Start, as it contains enough organization to be above a Stub, although it requires far more detail. It has assessed this as low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 21:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The "notable prospects" section of this article is out of date, inaccurate, and does not adhere to the list guidelines, per WP:Source list.  Over the past several months, names have been randomly added or removed, without references.  This section needs clear criteria for inclusion, and every name added needs a source.  Or, the section needs to be removed.  Thank you for your input.  Magnolia677 (talk) 05:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding this call for input from 3 months ago, today I hid the "notable prospects" section from view.  There needs to be a discussion about the inclusion criteria for a notable prospect. The sources haven't been updated in 2 years, and the section is frequently vandalized by editors adding random names.  If there is no criteria for inclusion on this list, then it needs to be removed.  Thank you again.  Magnolia677 (talk) 04:21, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Notable prospects" section 

message: 1956 Canadian team at the Olympics has Al Brown as a player. It should say MEL BROWN.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ripley500 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada Mens national basketball team 

message: Does this section have any sources? If not it would not qualify and would be filed under original research and will have to be removed. I would love to see some sources and keep it though. Are there any? Krazytea(talk) 05:58, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty sure this is just some editor's opinion.  I have looked for sources of this online and found none.  In fact, as of Jan. 26, 2021 the top Canadian in the NBA according to https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/nba-player-ratings/  WAR are Luguentz Dort and Chris Boucher, but those guys are buried as third stringers on this depth chart, whereas the worst Canadian in the NBA in WAR is Tristan Thompson, who this depth chart has in the starting 5, so the chart would seem to bear little relationship with current roster members performance. JoeSchlabotnik (talk) 18:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Depth chart