lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dramatic programming

message: I wrote a stub because a German-speaker was asking about the term on the Village Pump. This may NOT be entirely accurate, I'm just trying to get something started here. I'm not much of a TV person. Have at it. -- Jmabel 19:20, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks anyway! High on a tree 18:41, 7 May 2004 (UTC)

text: If the two are merged, it should be in an article called Television drama, rather than series. DionysosProteus (talk) 14:18, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

message: The heading is confusing as "Dramatic programming" can refer to both radio and television. Furthermore there is a Radio drama article and another that deals with the Television play  Rwood128 (talk) 21:25, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing heading and similar articles
Talk:1851

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect this page: the year in topic paragraph would be replaced with a see also box.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 19:24, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: According to Irish potato famine, there was an 1851 census in Canada too (see under Emigration), so was the UK census actually a UK and dominion census? EvocativeIntrigue TALK | EMAIL 19:32, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1851 UK census 

message: In December 2008, an anon user 140.203.12.240 entered a massive amount of fake info into this page, some of which has been in place over 18 months. It is now removed. Green Cardamom (talk) 15:22, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Massive vandalism
Talk:Eastern

message: Cornerstones in this tradition are arguably beliefs in:
* spiritual,
* karmic, 
* or ancestral forces
* personal auras,
* or energy flows around the human body
* and anti-scientific thought in general.
This, especially the last point, is horribly POV. I've removed some parts; if anyone wants to rewrite it and re-incorporate it, the original text is above. Ambarish Talk 20:01, 6 May 2004 (UTC)

message: I think that this page should be a disambiguation page. I have added at the bottom a link to the "Ostern", which is sometimes referred to as the "Eastern", but means something quite different. "Eastern" is no doubt also the name of various other things, such as railway lines in the east of a country. --MacRusgail 14:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:X (Australian band)

message: This article is very, very badly written. It reads like teenage fan-scrawl, and contains almost no actual evidence or even explanaion for its poorly expressed claims. Poor writing aside, what, for example, could possibly be "unique" about a bass player using simple "down strokes"? Absolutely nothing, I suspect. And what is a "pic"? A photograph? I suspect that the writer meant "pick", but should probably have properly referred to this object as a "plectrum". Why not just "finger-style electric guitarist"? And "thrasing"? "Thrash" was a musical approach and style that simply didn't exist until a number of years after this band had released its recording and played the shows mentioned. Somebody needs to (almost) entirely re-write the article - preferably somebody who knows something about the band.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.201.100.168 (talk) 16:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made some edits to move the article more into Wikipedia's standards. Happy New Year. Morganfitzp (talk) 17:30, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrible Writing
Talk:1849

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 21:02, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Wouldn't it be better to organize by event type rather than just the lists of "events", "births", and "deaths"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.74.163 (talk) 22:31, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: [A better organization]
Talk:1848

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 21:04, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:1847

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 21:05, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:1846

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 21:05, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Mmmmh, interesting. Can we have reliables references to that? Jajaja, I recommend erasing that part.
But i'm not doing it myself, because I enjoy that little joke. 201.252.1.208 (talk) 19:11, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collin Saved the Earth
Talk:1845

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 21:06, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 06:53, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: That’s the kill streak 109.78.255.8 (talk) 18:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  That’s not a year
Talk:1844

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 21:07, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: ]Untitled]
Talk:1843

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 21:07, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: * added * June 6 - In Barbados, Samuel Jackman Prescod, is the first non-white person  - Date added (see Prescod page for ref) .... he wasn't black... he was classified as non-white. Others use the phrase the first of african descent ... but I'll let others decide.
You already had the fact, but no date. Victuallers (talk) 18:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: June 6

message: A factoid of this article made the front page on Wikipedia today. Too bad there is a glaring error. These kinds of errors are what gives Wikipedia a bad name. :( 
The factoid states
:"1843 – The first major wagon train heading for the Pacific Northwest set out on the Oregon Trail (reenactment pictured) with a thousand pioneers from Elm Grove, Missouri."
I'm not here to debate the "major" part, but where it says "a thousand pioneers" has just GOT to be wrong. The Oregon Trail (OT) article claims a significantly lower number as
:"... with more than 100 pioneers."
I don't know how to change things on the front page, but I really hope we don't see this as trivia now at other sites because they read it here. I may x-post (yes, that's bad but hopefully someone can fix it today or now) this to the OT page. MagnoliaSouth (talk) 15:27, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously big wagon train error from 5/16
Talk:1842

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 21:07, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:1841

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 21:07, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:1840

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 21:08, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 01:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:Stone circle

message: Anyone constructed a list of stone circles appearing in stories, films and other works? (There must be more than Children of the Stones.) Could be extended to include hill figures carved into chalk and other such phenomena. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.85.6.26 (talk) 18:43, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stone circles and fiction

message: I have edited to include more focus on stone circles in non-European countries.   Megalithic stone circles are a big topic in Europe and especially UK and the article looked like it was written primarily from that perspective.   We already have Stone circles in the British Isles and Brittany and Stone circle (Iron Age) articles focussed on European details -- and concentric and recumbent going into even more detail -- so possibly some of the text from the Europe section of this page should move out to some of those (if it doesn't already repeat them). But the current page's title is 'stone circles' so the page should be about the general phenomenon rather than just a local version.   North american medicine wheels are of particular interest as there is still some cultural memory of how they are used by first nations people.  I have not deleted any text, just moved it around.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.195.234 (talk) 10:43, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Strongly disagree. A format of development and type is far more insightful than a TOC based on geographic location, esp as the density is very much Northern Europe. Ceoil (talk) 23:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

text: North american medicine wheels are a totally different thing. Ceoil (talk) 23:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Eurocentric view
Talk:Against All Enemies

message: There's also a novel of the same name, by neo-con Ben Wattenberg and a collaborator.  Do we need a disambiguation?--Orange Mike 22:04, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ==

message: If I rememeber rightly when wacthing the 9 11 hearings, it came out the George Bush had never even met him, in a professional capacity before the attacks.  is this true?
==Fair use rationale for Image:AgainstAllEnemies.jpg==
:Image:AgainstAllEnemies.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ==

message: :Image:AgainstAllEnemies.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:45, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:AgainstAllEnemies.jpg
Talk:You Got Served

message: I removed the section about this supposed spinoff supposed series, as I could not find any mention of it with Google, let alone a reliable source.  If this is in fact real and someone has a source, go ahead and reinsert it. -Elmer Clark 05:42, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series 

message: Omarion got criticized for doing the Crip Walk while wearing red? I highly doubt there was any controversy of this particular nature. Source?205.212.75.130 07:39, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crip Walk "criticism" 

message: I removed what I thought was vandalism from the page. There was a link to the article "Worst Movies Ever Made" and the non-existant article "You Got Served 2". Legendotphoenix 21:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism? 

message: I tagged the article NPOV because it reads like a promotional piece and does not represent the weight of the sources, especially the section on reviews, and box office performance. The article is almost totally unreferenced. --causa sui (talk) 16:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV and referencing
Talk:Homomonument

message: is often described as a memorial to the gay victims of World War II,
Shouldn't that be gay victims of Nazi Germany? I'm sure a lot of gays died in World War II, but I doubt that this is commonly described as a reason for the monument.--Eloquence* 21:29, May 6, 2004 (UTC)
Yes that is a loose formulation. Incidentally, I am interested to know if the Nazi occupation authorities took any action against gay men in the Netherlands. They don't seem to have done so in Paris. Adam 00:20, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is. Jvhertum (talk) 13:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: They should have entitled this monument something different. The current name sounds incredibly distasteful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vayne (talk • contribs) 07:32, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct, that's an American thing. The Dutch word 'homo' doesn't have the negative connotations the American word has. (But trust me, we have other insults.) 'Homomonument' sounds slightly playful to Dutch ears. Modallist (talk) 18:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Must be an American thing... 

message: Maybe I'm reading this wrong, but it looks like designs were submitted (1980) a year after construction began (1979). Is planning of construction always this haphazard and carefree in the Netherlands? If so, I have some ideas to build dikes. Call me, Netherlands.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.113.27.222 (talk) 19:58, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timing in the history 
Talk:Jo Moore

message: The more I trawl through the Google results for "jo moore" and "martin sixsmith" the more I realise how difficult this story is to do justice to in a succinct article. It's all rumour and misinformation and innuendo and generally as clear as mud and I have a headache now. --rbrwrˆ
:In brief - she was a spin doctor and did exactly what a spin doctor is supposed to do. Why this is a surprise to anyone is a mystery. --Bonalaw 15:24, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues

message: The article seems to fizzle out towards the end - it doesn't say what happened to Moore as a consequence of the email. According to The Times today she went on to leave the government and retrain as a teacher, but the article doesn't mention this. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 08:22, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Subsequent career
Talk:Pall mall

message: All these links are ghosts, so why does this page need to be here?? 66.245.18.154 23:00, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed its not great, but there's no point in deleting it, as it will help when someone de-ghosts the links. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 23:24, 6 May 2004 (UTC)

text: I created this page yesterday, along with Pall Mall, London... if you give me a few more hours then there will be more articles.  And one of the reasons I made it was because there were various different pages linking to here for these different meanings.  fabiform | talk 13:47, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've moved the game Pall Mall to its own page Pall mall (game), to allow Pall Mall to be a disambiguation page. Guroadrunner 10:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pall Mall game moved to own page
Talk:Bognor Regis

message: The "Bugger Bognor" section suggests it was sometime after 1929 but does not specify when. As it is so recent, surely the date must be known? Robertm25 (talk) 22:39, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The change of name took effect on 26 July 1929, as is now sourced in the text. Stortford (talk) 20:33, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was Regis added to the name?
Talk:Terrorism against Israel in 2000

message: Curios why FACTS are "disputed"; those people are gone... they are IN GRAVES now. Isn't that enough or you neer to kill them once more???
I hope YOU won't end in a way that YOUR LEG will be picked up from the street, while YOUR BRAIN will be scrubbed from the bus floor!!!
:Please direct your comments as shown below and not abuse wikipedia --SpaceMonkey 17:12, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please direct any comments on the accuracy dispute to Talk:Violence against Israelis#Lists, where I have explained my reasoning. Thank you. —No-One Jones 10:44, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy dispute

message: I want to say that the person(s) who constructed these pages have done a very good job. It may be pretty difficult to live in Israel, at least sometimes. Especially if you're surrounded by terrorists, and then you go to Wikipedia and you are surrounded by terrorists' advocates who will always try to beat you, humiliate you and your work, erase you page, question anything they can including the unquestionable things - and all these terrorists' friends will tell you, at the very end, that you are the wrong person and you are "spreading POV". I know it's sad, but be sure that the good people in the world are on your side.  --Lumidek 04:27, 29 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good work done here 

message: toward Israel Robin Hood 1212 14:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is biased
Talk:Anal wink

message: Article kept by consensus. VfD notice removed. Archived delete discussion below. -- Cecropia | Talk 05:32, 11 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep? 

message: It seems like some information should be included about the "Anal Wink Test" here, which was a "test" used to determine if a child had been sexually molested as was used as such in at least some court cases in the "satanic panic" of the late 1980s.  It was later determined to be unrelated to having been abused.
Something about when this case took place would be helpful Htaccess 10:39, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include "Anal Wink Test" Information 

message: I will re-request the book with the information, but the "anal wink test" was not Bruce Woodling's creation; he was using a test that had been used by another dubious practitioner to determine whether an adult male had been sodomized (and was therefore a homosexual.)  Still no medical validity to it, but not original to Woodling. -- Antaeus Feldspar 00:50, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woodling did not develop the test 

message: It is ambiguous if this trial cost the most Perhaps the OJ trial cost the most -- there is a discussion on the McMartin preschool trial page regarding this issue -- Cliffb 04:16, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost

message: Would a short video clip of an anal wink  be useful for this entry?
I just got a new digital video camera.
Trollaxor (talk) 01:42, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video? 

message: Criticism of a living person must be reliably sourced.  See WP:BLP.  Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 19:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP issues
Talk:Cunedda

message: Your dates for Cunedda contradict my sources (Frere, Salway), where do they come from? 
I changed the date of Roman withdrawal as it was Honorius who wrote the letter in 410, three years after the troops left. I added Frere's description of Paternus as native chief rather than a Roman soldier. I rewrote and rearranged the dating arguments so I hope they make more sense. Non-US spelling for non-US subject. I think I kept all the earlier points too.  adamsan  01:08, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Dating

message: No hay ninguna mención a Gwenwyn, una de sus hijas, que se menciona en el siguiente articulo donde se habla del personaje epónimo de este tema nuevo. Christian Alexis Arroyo Ortiz (discusión) 01:47 14 abr 2022 (UTC) Christian Alexis Arroyo Ortiz (talk) 01:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amlawdd Wledig 

message: The most cited scholar on this subject has been Molly Miller, who is at odds with much of what is said here. I have also published a little that shows that everything before Einion is not part of an historical Gwynedd dynasty. Tallhwch (talk) 02:11, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genealogy
Talk:Alpine States

message: Welcome, user 24.189.3.230!  Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.  It looks like the original information for this article was copied from this article on the WorldWorx travel site.  We cannot use their copyrighted information without permission.  
Please help us to rewrite this article so that it doesn't contain any of the copyrighted writing from the WorldWorx site.  We can use the facts in their article as reference material for writing our own, but we cannot simply copy what they wrote.
Thanks for your help!  Catherine - talk 01:42, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Alpine states

message: There seems to be an error in the content of this site.  It lists only Austria, France, and Italy as the primary Alpine states without reference to Switzerland.  A quick look at the map shows this to be incorrect.  Hoping someone can correct the error with the relevant statistics.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brianbale (talk • contribs) 14:02, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 2 

message: Is it worth mentioning here that the Alps - specifically the K%C5%91szeg Mountains - also extend into Hungary (although they are not part of the Alpine Convention)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmythemini (talk • contribs) 00:30, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hungary