Talk:Opera Mini

message: Can we get some numbers here on Opera's 
 the cell phone browser market? Mathiastck 16:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Market Share 

message: From the "History" section
On November 28, the final version of Opera Mini 3 was released.
The "final" version? Right on the right-hand side, it says  Latest release: 3.02 (build 6540) / December 15, 2006.
Seems like a silly, unnecessary statement. Maybe it means the non-beta version, or something like that? Then "Opera Mini 3 emerged from beta on November 28" seems better. 209.195.77.59 01:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Final" obviously means "non-beta", like with all other software. -Ritarri 08:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Version? 

message: It might make sense to change the image depicting the functionality in the "Functionality illustrated" section to this newer and more professional looking image on the Opera Mini site: http://www.operamini.com/images/server2.gif
There is some accompanying text that could serve as a caption as well on the features page: http://www.operamini.com/features/ Op12 17:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Functionality illustrated 

message: I am sorry to say this but this page reads like an advertisement. The language is almost marketing-like. I suggest that some passages are rewritten to accomodate for this. Regards, Daimanta (talk) 18:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 

message: From the History section:
In Overview mode, the user can scroll a zoomed out version of certain web pages. This feature is not yet available on BlackBerries and some other devices.[15]
Overview is supported on Blackberries, but not landscape mode. Search the referenced page for * to find that piece of information.
// Lunkwill @ Opera 88.131.66.80 (talk) 08:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. Do you know of any sources that explain this? —Remember the dot (talk) 23:46, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information in article 

message: Do we need the section and explaining on which devices/pda/whatever om is pre-installed/bundled with? there is no need for. also not for the Network operators... If nobody will answer, I will completly remove this section and write a few sentences...mabdul 0=* 17:30, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Market adoption 

message: I think that it's very good article and don't need any improovements. I'd revard it with a yellow star!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.146.167.62 (talk) 23:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great 

message: What hardware and software does Opera Mini require? For example, to run on Palm OS it requires the IBM WebSphere Micro Environment Java Virtual Machine for Palm OS, which hasn't been updated for a few years. (Circa 2007.) It also requires a 3rd party app like VFS Exchange to install the .JAD and .JAR files because IBM's installer only supports direct URLs to .JAD files on the web - it cannot install from local sources like an SD card. Bizzybody (talk) 09:48, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platform requirements? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Opera Mini. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.opera.com/mini/features/?
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081205001853/http://wapreview.com/blog/wp-mobile.php?p=397 to http://wapreview.com/blog//wp-mobile.php?p=397
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:33, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Opera Mini#Low-memory_device_support claims version 3 is still available for MIDP1 devices. However, the linked source no longer has it available for download --86.50.71.195 (talk) 19:48, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 Basic still available? 

message: I am running Opera Mini on my phone. In Settings > About Opera Mini the version number is given as 26.0.2254.117551. There is no information that corresponds to the information in this article which refers to Opera Mini versions by a single digit number. I can find no information in this article that describes the version history in manner that ties in to the reality of version numbers given in Opera Mini running on mobile devices.  Does Opera Mini have a different version systems for mobile platforms and for desk machines?  Can anyone clarify?  At the moment the article is full of data but seems incoherent. LookingGlass (talk) 08:58, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Articles on Wikipedia go out of date if no one update them. And people who do this are just like you and me. I updated the version number to the latest version that can be acquired from a source. —Codename Lisa (talk) 10:04, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: NOT FIXED Firstly you appear to have misread and/or misunderstood my comment.  Secondly I can find no such revision to the article through a comparison of the editing History section.  Your edit ONLY undid mine!!  Therefore I have reverted your deletion.  PLEASE do NOT simply go to war about this.  Consult, agree, cooperate.  I am familiar with wiki and have been an editor of it for well over a decade. LookingGlass (talk) 10:41, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  LOL.  You said: "" That's because you are looking at the wrong place. Here is what I did: . All five revisions of it. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 16:17, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

text: Hi again. Opera for desktop is covered in Opera (browser) article. Please discuss it there. Thanks. —Codename Lisa (talk) 16:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: @Codename Lisa, You clearly demonstrate your competence in wiki coding however you assume this grants you special editing status.  It amuses you that I looked for your edits in the correct place and was frustrated in this by your cleverness, invisible to us common folk.  Incidentally your edit of the template (?!?!) changes nothing as you have entirely misunderstood what I have written here.  I also note you edited this Talk section with similar hauteur, inserting your comments with no respect for chronology, something most readers will not note and which I myself assumed at first was evidence of an oversight on my part.  Through all of this you present yourself as owning the "higher ground", summarily dismissing any legitimacy in my comments.  Your negative editing seems only to serve some personal desire, as it certainly brings no benefit to wiki.  It merely stifles discussion and consideration of improvement.  In stark contrast to my editing which has sought to improve wiki through discussion, yours merely summarily enacts your judgements.  So, I have learned what litle there is of use here to understanding the Opera ecosystem and I have tried to constructively engage with wiki's content to move its knowledge base forward.  You have demonstrated your determination to frustrate this and as I have no time at present to contest your claim to, what you appear to see as, your fiefdom, I will leave you to enjoy it. LookingGlass (talk) 10:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? You've been here for ten years? Because in addition to the external version number sources, you also seem to not know about proper indentation of messages in talk pages, WP:NPA and WP:AGF either. If you feel someone has misunderstood you, kindly waste no time and paraphrase. Because, the odds are, nobody else has understood you either. —Codename Lisa (talk) 16:27, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, over ten. True, more front-of-house/content-interest than code-monkey/librarian.  Takes all sorts but ... no more time to waste.  LookingGlass (talk) 10:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doesn't match reality 

message: Opera Mini seems dead and no store currently serves it. (Not sure if old APK versions/Java versions still work.)
Should the tense be changed to past tense on the page? ("Opera mini *was* a browser...") --- Ɍưɳŋınɢ 05:25, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I am wrong, it is still served on Android store, it is not served on iOS store. The homepage for it no longer exists, as of February 2020. - Ɍưɳŋınɢ 05:29, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Opera Mini dead? 

message: See the link and the reference at "5.0 and later". I don't know if they were working before, but they are broken now. Someone may be able to reconstruct a working version from the history or adjust Wikidata to fix the problem. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:56, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikidata changes may have broken a link