Talk:Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee

message: I've just noticed that the title for "Oddworld: Abe's Oddysee" needs to be moved or changed because it says "Oddworld:Abe's Oddysee" because really there should be another space in the title. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yuri Elite (talk • contribs) 21:45, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed.  From my memory of playing the game 7 years ago, I wouldn't say the characters have any artificial intelligence whatsoever.  User:dbenbenn 04:49, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Early comments

message: Well, I tried to make things a little better. Grammatically mainly, although I tried to edit things to keep them more to the point.
I didn't change much of what the author originally said, but I tried to find references for what I could. Although some I still can't find anywhere. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessadactyl (talk • contribs) 07:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I tried 

message: * I thought I'd have a go and help improve this article. I have rewritten around 90% of it and I believe it only needs some refining. Feedback would be smashing. -Abraham Lure 02:00, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Started doing some work...

message: I see some kind soul has helpfully, and apparently randomly, deleted the images which were being used in this article. Thanks for that.—Abraham Lure 16:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Good.—Abraham Lure 19:54, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: I added a link to the walkthrough we created which was deleted as link spam. (http://www.megaproducts.co.uk/games/abes/) Perhaps I cna give you a little background. 
I was in the UK developemnt dept. for GT Interactive and in charge of the game testing over here. We did pretty much all the game play testing. Whilst there I wrote the offical solution to a number of games.
If you still think it'sspam, then that's fine, but I do think the link merrits inclusion.
LiamVictor 18:09, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link Spam 

message: Wow, this is the first time I've hit a FA using Special:Random. I feel randomly special. :) jj137 (Talk) 01:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cool 

message: :Image:Paramite.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Paramite.jpg

message: Is this game side scrolling? If it is split into screens, how can it be a side scroller? 84.0.117.134 (talk) 17:39, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. I don't know how I haven't noticed that before. I removed side scrolling remarks from the article. --Mika1h (talk) 20:18, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Side scrolling? 

message: The article doesn't warrant two similar lookin cover art pictures. WP:NFCC is quite clear on this: "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic". Another similar cover art depicting Abe doesn't add anything to the article. If you disagree, state valid reasons for keeping the two cover arts. --Mika1h (talk) 12:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Have to agree - the Windows version cover adds nothing to the article's understand since it is similar to the PSx version.  --MASEM 21:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Agree, there's no need to have the two images from what I can see, although if the editor adding them wants to explain how it would "significantly increase readers' understanding", I'm open to suggestion. --Oscarthecat (talk) 21:26, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover art pictures 

message: I don't think this article, in its current state, is good enough to be a featured article. It has a short lead, several short paragraphs, overly detailed plot section, a cleanup tag (which has been overlooked since August), a short development section, five fair use images, an info on its Japanese release which should be discussed in the article's body, a section on enemies lacking any reception information, no sales information, a non-notable section on an FMV (which is stated to be notable by the fact that it's only in one version, which makes no sense), redundantly lists scores in both the body of the reception and its table, and the Game Boy version has no discussion of its notability whatsoever. And on the subject of images...
#Cover image: Rationale seems like it was placed on there without thinking - lacks any reasoning to why it needs to be used, and actually calls it a screenshot when it is a cover image.
#Plot image: Doesn't convey any image of the game, and I can barely tell what it conveys. Not a good image by any means.
#Gameplay image 1 - The one of Abe walking. It shows the visual style, for sure, but it's Abe standing. It is not a very good screenshot at all, because it doesn't actually convey something discussed in the article.
#Gameplay image 2 - Definitely don't need this one. It doesn't really tell the reader anything at all. 
#Japanese change image - Interesting, but do we need an image for something that is discussed in two sentences?
I'd like to see this improved, but by the looks of it, there is very little editing being done by those involved in the previous FA push. As it stands, I don't think this would qualify as a GA either. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 23:05, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA quality? 

message: Assessed as C; excessive fair use images, guide content [teaching readers how to obtain certain endings; not necessarily a problem in that and more in the WAY it shows the information], excessive discussion of its enemies and wildlife with no reason why we're discussing them, use of references in lead, poor fair use rationales [one of them even using another rationale used that can't even apply], and an awkward reception section [giving a single line of content to discuss the music and the only discussion being what one person thought], and cleanup tags. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 09:41, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Should this game and sequals mention stealth game element and be put in that category? a large amount of its gameplay is stealth based and this game is mentioned in the stealth game article. I know it's a platform game, a game can be in more than one category, and usually is. Carlwev (talk) 23:46, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Stealth game?

message: Why is this game mentioned at the end of the page? That game doesn't exist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.228.104.210 (talk) 14:50, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Hand of Odd Game