lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Scotch Plains, New Jersey

message: could not find a source for the original name of Park, someone please investigate further. Skipper1931 (talk) 11:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

message: I removed the following statement &mdash ", and McGinn is the only school to receive 3 stars on the NJ School Report Card" — as unsupported and questionable. I've been reading the New Jersey School Report Cards for years and have never seen a star rating. Furthermore, on what basis is it the "only school" to mmet this criteria? The only one in the district, area, county, state, etc.? As such, I'm leaving it here for discussion. Alansohn 16:49, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education 

message: The redirect Scotch Plains, New Jersey has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Graham87 16:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Scotch Plains, New Jersey]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Belokrinitskaya Hierarchy

message: I think the article should be merged or somehow more directly connected to the one about "The Russian Orthodox Old-Rite Church". It also needs to be polished for more precision and quality (the verb "to organize" is consistently misspelled).
* Hi, anonimus! Please, polish the article, but it shouldn't be merged. ROORC is a church, a body, a congregation. Belokrinitskoe Soglasie is a denomination, a faith to which this church belongs. And the Hierarchy is a whole tree of priests and bishops. Several churches belong to this tree, not only ROORC, and much more used these priests earlyer. Ideally somebody (maybe me) should fill this article with at least a line of mitropolitans of Moscow, and maybe some other famous priests from this hierarchy. But it certainly shoudn't be merged! Arseni 05:56, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled]
Talk:Search problem

message: This is explained really difficult. Isn't "finding a value in a list" also a search problem? I would add it myself, but I have no time now. 131.155.73.81 (talk) 12:05, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

message: The article has incomplete symbols which make it difficult to understand. First sentence "such that field(R) ⊆ Γ+" What set does tau represent? L(R)=\{x\mid \exists y R(x,y)\}. \,  L(R) = x such that there exists y <what?> R(x,y)  EaswarH 02:44, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing tag 

message: The three references are identical. This should be corrected.Shuroo (talk) 19:54, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: This article appears to be a poor mash-up of the PlanetMath article and Brown's lecture notes. It is even hard to tell that they are talking about the same thing. There are texts about this subject. We can certainly do better than this.--Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 03:50, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs improvement
Talk:Ballymore Stadium

message: As a Brisbane resident I've never heard of Ballymore referred to as Ballymore Stadium. It's always just Ballymore, perhaps a move is in order? Bongomanrae (talk) 22:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to  [[Ballymore]] 
Talk:2d:4d

message: Much of the material in this article relates not directly to digit ratio but to theories about sexual orientation effects of pre-natal androgen exposure.  I suggest that much of it ought to be moved to biology and sexual orientation page, or Prenatal hormones and sexual orientation page (and improved along the way, all three pages need much more clarity of thought and care in presentation). Pete.Hurd 20:42, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely concur on merging.  The main article should be Digit ratio, and the 2d:4d should redirect to it. Biology and sexual orientation should contain only a minimal summary of the topic, with the primary purpose of such mention being to link readers to Digit ratio for further information.  Of course, I generally favor smallish articles that are richly linked, rather than exhaustively long articles with many exhaustive subsections. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 06:09, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Oh... to add to my own comment, Digit ratio is not only about sexual orientation.  Testosterone exposure affects lots of physiological and behavior traits that have nothing to do with sexual orientation.  So while the Digit ratio article and the Biology and sexual orientation article should cross-link, they merely overlap rather than one being a subset of the other. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 06:12, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-Digit ratio content
Talk:Earle Labor

message: I've removed the following information for which a citation has been requested since 2008:
"The Merriam-Webster dictionary has taken one of its definitions of funambulism from an essay of his on the subject .  It is a common strategy of his to identify characters in literary works who demonstrate the psychological trait of funambulism."
If an editor would like to restore the info, please ensure it has a reliable source included and perhaps the meaning of the phrase could be explained as it is unclear as currently written. --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 20:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Content removed
Talk:Duboce Park

message: Duh-BOH-ss? What?
There are two very common ways of pronouncing Duboce. 'Duh' and 'Doo' are both common, so starting out this article with a definitive claim that it's only said one way is incorrect.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.128.109.242 (talk) 20:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation 
Talk:Toyota 3S-GE engine

message: Wikipedia is a not a tuner knowledge base. The pertinent information here should be merged with the Toyota engines page and the rest deleted. --Tysto 06:00, 2005 August 21 (UTC)
Even if this is the case, I would not recommend merging it the Toyota A engine page. --Dan 00:45, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For: If this variant is to have its own page then so should the others, or is there little to say about them. I think at the moment it would be better to keep everything together and leave this as a re-direct page. The main page would then more obviously flag the differences in engines which is probably of most interest to readers. Also, as nothing significant has been added in the article for over 12 months, is there much else to say. I think there is a good case for merging the articles and have added flags to try to open up the discussion. Malcolma (talk) 08:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Toyota A engine]]

message: It has been suggested that the 3S-GE and 3S-GTE articles be merged into the Toyota S engine article. No conclusion was reached in 2008. Comments? Please refrain from making major changes until some form of consensus has been reached.  Stepho  (talk) 04:06, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: For Definitely, this article is entirely extraneous. Bdc101 (talk) 19:32, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

text: The crankshaft, located within the crankcase, rotates on five aluminium alloy bearings and is balanced by eight weights.
As opposed to a crankshaft located in the trunk?  And what else would the bearings of a 20th Century production engine be made of?  It should be rewritten in a concise fashion, then merged with the S-motor article.  If the 50-plus year old Chevrolet Small-Block engine, with over a dozen variants, can make do with one article, surely the Toyota S can do the same.  HuntClubJoe (talk) 01:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Thanks for picking up on our laziness. Much better now.  Stepho  (talk) 04:05, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Toyota S engine
Talk:4-Hero

message: This is nothing but fan zeal and is badly in need of cleanup—if it should be kept at all. "[t]he significance of 4 Hero for much of the development of British dance music over the last decade-and-half cannot be understated." I heartily concur. --Tysto 06:08, 2005 August 21 (UTC)
: ha ha, funny... MisterSheik
::I've cleaned it up, and hopefully removed the POV from it. I think it should be kept though - they are MOBO winners, after all. That should be sufficient to assert notablity. KeithD (talk) 13:20, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup and NPOV
Talk:Khaja

message: I would suggest the editors to avoid having a very restricted information on any subject, and massive edits of existing materials should normally be avoided. I also know Khajas are prepared in Kakinada area of Andhra Pradesh, but there it reached from Bihar when the Nandas disintegrated and fled to Andhra Pradesh. We are editing en encyclopedia and not writing an essay in a primary school. Happy editing. --Bhadani 06:42, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Orissa workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Orissa or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 02:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Orissa Addition
Talk:Paisley Park Studios

message: Feel free to add anything - most of this is from memory...
Mitchberg 06:44, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I don't agree with last revision (02:16, 27 January 2008 by Musicscene), as some of the information the entry had is lost. Even more, all references are erased
--El Pantera (talk) 10:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information lost
Talk:Shade (character)

message: In Victorian London, he would make enemies of the corrupt Ludlow family, whose efforts to kill him would span 150 years (and would be recounted in a 1997 limited series).
What was the name of this limited series? -- Jeffrywith1e 14:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just called The Shade and it's a 4 issue series. Hasn't been collected in a trade paperback or anything, but if you find the issues on eBay or elsewhere I can't recommend it enough MarkSutton 20:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limited Series 

message: I have head something that in one part of the infinite crisis whole grouping that Shade informed Stargirl of her fathers death. I don't remember the issue but it was a bit more that a cameo so maybe we could add the direct issue name, or a mention of the deed? macgyver tape (talk) 03:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  dealings with stargirl 
Talk:Michel Saloff Coste

message: *gentle oppose. This page has some vanity characteristics , but vanity alone is not a reason for speedy deletion. It seems that this professor may be notable (although I have never heard of him before, I do not know the names of many professors outside of my home country, and there are business professors at less notable schools than HEC who have biography pages in Wikipedia, such as my colleague David Cooperrider. I am editing the page to Wikify it. Mamawrites 07:30, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One problem: I cannot locate this professor's name on the HEC list of professors. Mamawrites
* I have removed the speedy delete tag, because the article does not meet speedy deletion criterion A7; it assert notability ("has published several books", etc.). If you want it to be removed, please userfy (if the author agrees) or take it to VFD.  Sietse 08:28, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments on speedy deletion

message: See the talk about deletion on the French WP : fr:Wikipédia:Pages à supprimer/Michel Saloff Coste
*Thanks... - Introvert |? 21:19, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: French deletion ??
Talk:Guglielmo Achille Cavellini

message: just set this up to init based on sticker received in mail (july, 2005) -- seems worthy of inclusion.  need more sources and reliable information, and will return with such shortly i do believe. Here 07:32, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: major expansion.  his involvement in mail art still needs expansion... more to come. ∴ here…♠ 07:29, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  its alive 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Trek/Non-canon Star Trek

message: This survey has been going on a while, and it seems that most people have voted for inclusion of all, or most, non-canon material. Should this now be regarded as a consensus? Is it allowed to write articles about non-canonical Star Trek characters (except for minor characters with only one appearance)? — JIP | Talk 07:36, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see why not.--StAkAr Karnak 11:55, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Go West (band)

message: I've added an infobox - Foetusized 23:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Despite what every Go West fan knows, here in the States, "Call Me" and "We Close Our Eyes" are the first true hits for this band...no, really!...Baldwin91006 (talk) 03:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The real U.S. hits for Go West!

message: The article needs more sources and has been tagged accordingly. SunCrow (talk) 19:32, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. I cut out the unsourced material. SunCrow (talk) 13:46, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more sources
Talk:Pear Garden

message: Please help to expand this page if you know more about this opera troupe and please do not screw up this page or move it like what Willy willy willy willy... Mushroom, Mushroom did.08:49, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Were females admitted into Chinese theater in general at this time?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.136.26.26 (talk) 03:10, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Actresses
Talk:Deyang

message: Looking up these characters, the Mandarin pronunciation dosn't match the city name. Someone more familiar with the subject should check up on this. ⇝Casito⇝Talk 08:21, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I figured it out. Someone used the characters from Yi-bin ⇝Casito⇝Talk 08:26, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Lohardaga district

message: ----
----
A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 13:05, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:36, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Gumla district

message: A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 13:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:22, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Simdega district

message: A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 13:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Palamu district

message: ----
----
A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 13:07, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Latehar district

message: ----
----
A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 13:04, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Garhwa district

message: ----
----
A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 12:58, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Multipoint control unit

message: What are MCs and MPs in this context?? -- 790 08:37, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.ca/books?id=w9saZvhhgzIC&pg=PA219. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Hydrogenation (talk) 22:41, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Seraikela Kharsawan district

message: ----
----
A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 13:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Dumka district

message: A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 12:57, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:16, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Jamtara district

message: A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 13:04, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Sahebganj district

message: ----
----
A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 13:08, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Pakur district

message: ----
----
A request to all the fellow Wikipedians interested in the development of contents of this page: I shall be adding (say, by end-April/ early-May 2006) some more contents to this page. If some one may add a map and picture/s, the page shall become better. Thanks. --Bhadani 13:06, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 