lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Worship band

message: I don't think it was appropriate to have this article categorized with Category:Charismatic and Pentecostal Christianity, because even in the article itself references are made to the Emerging church, Evangelical churches, traditional Protestant churches, and Roman Catholic churches. "Worship bands" can now be found in nearly every Christian denomination or sect. Therefore there is no need to classify this article as specific to the Charismatic movement found within Christianity. --Philipacamaniac 18:05, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. — Matt Crypto 18:09, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah. silsor 20:59, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorizing this article under Category:Charismatic and Pentecostal Christianity 

message: The paragraph that was just added to the end is not very encylopedic, and needs to be revised. Actually, the article as a whole needs to be sectionalized and a few more wikilinks would be appropriate. Maybe this article should be trimmed to focus only on the band element, while a new Contemporary Christian Worship article should focus on the style and its features/critisms. --Philipacamaniac 00:26, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently Worship music is the article that addresses the topic of Contemporary Christian Worship. While I disagree that the entirety of Worship music should be so specific (worship music has existed in several forms for several centuries), I still think that the style criticisms in this article belong in Worship music. --Philipacamaniac 01:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I feel that it would be better if we could merge Worship leader, Worship music, Worship band and Worship presentation program into Christian Worship. If not, I suggest that we create an article on Modern Christian worship and merge the four articles into that one. Would've done it myself, but am looking for a general consensus. Please reply on this talk page. aJCfreak yAk 06:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging of related articles
Talk:Hamden Hall Country Day School

message: I am removing the cleanup tag from this page and taking personal responsibility for it from here on out.--Kazushi 18:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am assisting with this, as well. peteg913 22:42, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:She Is Suffering

message: Nobody is on record as having seen this video, and its contents remains a mystery.
The video is available on Holy Bible's 10th Anniversary Edition. Was this the first time it became available?
:No, it's on the Forever Delayed dvd as well, and that one's earlier. I agree the clip is crappy but the song is very good, haunting (especially when set against what was happening to Richey of course). /Strausszek (talk) 01:57, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Bedford Hospital

message: Some words are unnecessarily capitalized.  Jon513 18:20, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Quentin Roosevelt

message: As a child, i have a good souvenir of the remains of Quentin's plane : the propeller, the front radiator, one wheel and a small memorial with photos was placed in the MAFA (Maison de l'Amitié Franco-Américaine) in Chateau-Thierry. Today, the MAFA is closed, but i will try to obtain the current location of this propeller and post a photo of it.
Zeugma fr (talk) 18:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memorabilia of Quentin's plane 

message: - don't want to lose the source, but it's not showing up anyway because I'm guessing something's wrong with the closure of the Wikivoodoo tag? Can someone who can do Wikicode well fix this, please? ScarletRibbons (talk) 08:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poem tag
Talk:Dichopogon strictus

message: GRIN considers this species to be a synonym of Dichopogon strictus and classifies the plant in the family Laxmanniaceae.  Liliaceae is the old, catchall, family.  NCBI also classifies the plant in Laxmanniaceae, but accepts Arthropodium strictum as the genus.  Does anyone have anything definitive about this?   NaySay 18:25, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Norman High School

message: I've deleted the advert tag.  First of all, I think the advert tag is only for commercial promotion, so some other POV tag should have been used.  Secondly, I think I've cleaned up the worst of the pro-NHS bias.  If you disagree, talk to me and we'll fix it some more.
Oh, I'm working on the picture, too.
Ahalterman 04:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Here Comes Peter Cottontail

message: Why merge this with the article about the song?! There is more than enough information here and within the other film's article to sustain separate articles. - Kooshmeister
Hello Sir or Madam,
My name is Denise M. Ciavola, I am deaf and disabled woman, has interesting into this Peter Cottontail collections, and I know not many story that have these collections like dolls, figures, posters, books. But for years since I was little girl, I only am interested in one character: The evil Rabbit, January Q. Irontail. I drew this rabbit and made story from "bad character" to " Hero chartacter" and had his name in my mind for years, and is my MAINLY favorite one. 
So I hope someone can give me a chance to get what I want for years. You can reach me at Luckyfox64@cox.Com anytime and will be happy to reply from your email and give me anything that will make me happy to have it for long times, before too late.
Thank you,
Denise M. Ciavola  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.1.75.190 (talk) 22:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tell me Why 

message: I don't understand why the song redirects here either. Gene Autry's recording of "Peter Cottontail" pre-dates the TV special by about 20 years - there should be plenty of information available to create a separate article about the song. Oldiesmann (talk) 02:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song 

message: I don't think there's any mention here of the "frame story" with salesman Seymour S. Sassafras. Like so many of the Classic Rankin-Bass specials it features a narrator that is, visually, a caricature/tribute/homage to the individual voicing the narrator character - in this case, Danny Kaye. PurpleChez (talk) 14:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seymour S. Sassafras
Talk:Gastric antral vascular ectasia

message: Found a photo -- Samir धर्म 01:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Found

message: JFW | T@lk 09:22, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scleroderma 

message: The following quotation "Most patients with GAVE suffer from liver cirrhosis, autoimmune disease, chronic renal failure and bone marrow transplantation.," attributed to source 10 I think, must be wrong.  Transplantation should probably read failure, although I don't have the source handy.  Transplantation does not make any sense in that context.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.82.5.183 (talk) 17:46, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotation is wrong
Talk:Macy's Great Tree

message: I am curious to know what size a live tree would be other than life size.  Is the author trying to suggest that the tree is very large?
:I think the "tree" article should be expanded to also talk about other "Macy's Great Trees"  The iconic tree at Macy's on State Street in Chicago is called the "Great Tree" in the Walnut Room24.17.88.199 07:47, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:The Secret of the Sword

message: I read somewhere that Raggedy Ann & Andy: A Musical Adventure was the first film - it was released back in 1977. Esn 20:26, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First film based on a toy franchise

message: it was later edited into the series' first five episodes
I was always under the impression that the first five episodes were written as such (and certainly the fact one has a different writing team reinforces this) and only put together as a film to a) capitalise on the success of the He-Man, b) make it easier to launch She-Ra overseas (where the cartoon may not yet have arrived) and c) boost sales.
Is there any evidence the story was conceived as a film from the outset? Timrollpickering 08:52, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes there are additional bits in the individual episodes - from recollection these are mainly longer versions of particular scenes. Timrollpickering (talk) 01:29, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film cut into episodes or episodes compiled into film? 

message: The movie made $7.5 million. The $6.5 million box office intake noted on this page & by NYT is wrong.
According to IMDb https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089984/ , Box Office Mojo , and late Filmation President Lou Scheimer himself https://books.google.com/books?id=UROrDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA202&lpg=PA202&dq=Tom+Sito+Mattel&source=bl&ots=-hrYWsS0wS&sig=ACfU3U2X7OrjjHpsa_IHutxSkn0s-_mfpA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjasaup5LTzAhUrFlkFHUUxAKoQ6AF6BAgPEAM#v=onepage&q=Tom%20Sito%20Mattel&f=false, the movie's final tally was over $7.5 million. The New York Times $6.5 million was an earlier estimate, & the wikipedia page should reflect the higher & more accurate total. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:150:4100:95b0:a583:373f:78aa:857e (talk • contribs) 
:You know that you’re spamming this talk page, right? You just repeated the exact same thing you posted above, there was no need to repeat yourself here. ‐⁠‑🌀⁠SilSinnAL982100⁠💬 06:46, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The film made $7.5 million, and records reflect this. I don't know why someone reverted it to hide that fact, but the redaction amounts to misinformation.
Talk:John Wood, the Younger

message: 'The Circus' incorrectly links to a page about the film of that name starring Charlie Chaplain, which has nothing to do with this.MichaelMaggs 19:01, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center

message: I appears that this article is being edited in behalf of LANRC. Please refrain a neutral tone when editing, and if you have conflict of interest, it's best you don't edit the page at all. Zakhalesh (talk) 17:01, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean Retain a neutral tone? Will do. Made several corrections of the more effusive statements.  — DocOfSoc • Talk •   01:38, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: there needs to be a map and a more comprehensive description of the the buildings. preferably one which includes a reference to each building's own history as well as its overall significance to the complex. then and now photos would be cool too. I would undertake the task of providing these elements and others myself but i am ill-equipped to accomplish the entire objective. I hope someone will hear my plea and finish this article as I am actually in need of this information right now. if my ongoing investigation yields any fruit i will return here and provide what information i can.
Crash187 (talk) 03:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article is shockingly incomplete....
Talk:List of The Adventures of Jimmy Neutron, Boy Genius episodes

message: I changed what I think to be what the problem was, since they were the only "you"s i could find. Sorry if I missed any.
Deadlyops (talk) 20:58, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The use of the word you 

message: The eight two minute shorts are absent from the list and are already on the movie's main pageSsjhowarthisawesome (talk) 14:13, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are they not on this list anymore? 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:49B2:D007:BF6A:E2F5 (talk) 07:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shorts 

message: In Season 2/8 Return of the Nanobots has a double pardoy: 
Hugh laments not having enough time to eat all the pies he wanted to, saying "it's not fair, I had all the time in the world," like Burgess Meredith did in the Twilight Zone episode "Time Enough At Last."  
Jimmy tricks the Nanobots into exploding by having them calculate the exact value of pi. Captain Kirk disables the Enterprise's computer by having it calculate the value of pi after an evil spirit took control of the ship's computer in the Star Trek episode Wolf In the Fold (not Devil in the Dark)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.49.142.38 (talk) 20:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Parody

message: Can someone please add an apostrophe to the word "Yolkians" in the pilot episode "Runaway Rocketboy"? 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:7CFE:498:352C:3673 (talk) 06:30, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: M.Bitton (talk) 21:08, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 🤗 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:ECD7:3A03:A8C1:844A (talk) 07:49, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 August 2023 

message: Can someone please add the list of shorts made to promote the movie: "Carl Squared", "Cookie Time", "Hypercorn", "New Dog, Old Tricks", "Sea Minus", "Pain, Pain, Go Away", "Ultralord vs. the Squirrels", and the 5-part "Calling All Aliens" that leads up to the movie (which consists of "Leave A Message After The Beam", "The Night the Lights Went Out On Retroville", "Sound Wave Hello", "Rocket Tear", and "Arithemticket To Ride")? 74.132.203.31 (talk) 04:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. HouseBlastertalk 12:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 October 2023
Talk:Camille Coduri

message: The article from The People gives ages for Coduri's children and says that she's been married for 14 years (as of publication).  It wouldn't be in accordance with Wikipedia style to say "Coduri has two children, Rosa (13) and Sonny (10)", since that's time-dependent; but the birth years I've given are estimates, since it's possible (even probable) that they were born in the second half of the year.  If anyone can find another citation for the children's birthdates, or the year of Coduri's marriage, it would be great. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 19:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates of marriage and children

message: "She was statistically the weakest link in the third round and came close to being voted out two times. However she survived both times and went on to win the game (beating Noel Clarke)."
Whilst it's vitally important for people to know that Coduri was almost voted out twice, I feel we are missing some priority information.  Namely, what colour top she was wearing, how she got to the studio and possibly what she ate for breakfast. --Jwitch (talk) 00:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And as she is British we certainly have to check, how many lumps of sugar she took in her tea…  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.56.76 (talk) 17:48, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The Weakest Link

message: Is Sex On Legs!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.215.149.150 (talk) 15:52, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camille Coduri 

message: Significant role in reasonably significant film - not in filmography.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.199.88.151 (talk) 20:03, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Business 
Talk:Dorodango

message: All of the material was original by me, except the instructions, which were copied. I moved the original content to the temp page, and removed the instructions. Gaijin42 19:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Making them is a hobby, what they do with them are games? --Mandra Oleka (talk) 11:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

message: Are they fun to make? 100.11.187.86 (talk) 14:25, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making
Talk:OpenOffice Impress

message: Isint this a stub? can anyone add the appropriate stub tag? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by The editor1 (talk • contribs) 10:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: STUB?

message: I marked the statement about Impress's "key advantage" over PowerPoint being its open source nature. It is certainly open source, but there is no reference to say that this is Impress's key advantage. Sancho 22:53, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key advantage 

message: This page should probably have the contents summary at the top rather than most of the way down, and the main body of text could then be labelled something like 'overview'.
124.179.56.184 (talk) 11:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contents 

message: I consider this paragraph inadequate:
"An advantage that Impress has over PowerPoint is that it is distributed under an open source licence and so is freely available for download without charge."
Open Source means you can have access to the source code. The source code is available, with or without charge.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tct13 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open Source does not mean free of charge 

message: once apache relases aoo 3.4 i think we should change the openoffice screenshots from apache-open-office (aoo) running in ubuntu to aoo running in windows.
my rationale is that aoo is soon to become primarily a windows app. all linux distros have abandoned it and moved to libreoffice, therfore the article should not show aoo running ubuntu because this is misleading and not the most repsentative example of the aoo interface.
what do you think?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123465421jhytwretpo98721654 (talk • contribs) 02:54, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: screenshot os
Talk:Metal Gear Solid (film)

message: Is there a source to confirm that David Hayter will be playing the role of Solid Snake in the film? --Tuspm 19:17, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: David Hayter as Solid Snake

message: Should it be mentioned that Uwe Boll started spreading rumors that Hideo was in contact with him with regards to the possibility that he would direct the film, and Hideo's reaction to the rumor("Absolutely not! I don't know why Uwe Boll is even talking about this kind of thing. We've never talked to him. It's impossible that we'd ever do a movie with him.")? --Vercalos 00:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I dunno, but considering that the guy is know for bad video game to movie conversions, I'd say that putting under the director something saying "Not Uwe Boll" would be funny, but is a reference really encyclopedic? I say if anyone wants to know, they'll go to his article. - Thekittenofterra 02:35, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mmmh... you could put it in a "Production" or "Development" tag, I think, as like it or not, it is part of the "pre-production" (the rumored directors, I mean). I don't know for sure, though. - Cernex 03:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Sounds good to me too. Cernex 00:47, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I seperated it into its own paragraph since it was pretty messy the way it was.Minirogue 18:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uwe Boll Reference 

message: *
:Citation for use. —Erik (talk • contrib • review) - 13:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hayter is dumped. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for use 

message: Can anyone read French well enough to see if the source for the Viggo Mortensen rumor is reputable? Minirogue 23:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  French Viggo Rumor
Talk:Santa Fe Trail (film)

message: See edit this date. When you don't even attempt to be encyclopedic or document your points, you run the risk of being deleted. Since this entire section was anonymously written, I expect nothing, but I'll give it a month for anyone to rewrite and source. BTW I agree with the basic premise, but the holier-than-thou super-modifiers and inferences are over the top.--Reedmalloy (talk) 15:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Controversy"

message: The "Plot" section is currently just a diatribe against the film's use of fiction in its story.  While many of these points seem interesting enough to warrant inclusion in the article, they are misplaced under Plot, which should just be a neutral description of the actual film's narrative.  Secondly, the tone in the article overall is out of keeping with an encyclopedia.  The article says the film has "glaring inaccuracies," for example, as opposed to creative license.  It's a film, not a work of history, so what expectation is there that it should rigidly conform to history.  Shakespeare took as many liberties or more in his historical plays but this is rightfully seen as of pretty minor importance in articles like Henry IV, part 1.  Some of the complaints appear to have more to do with interpretation than neutral fact.  Since John Brown remains controversial today, I doubt whether his violent characterization in Santa Fe Trail reflects the "blatantly racist overtones" of the movies of the period so much as it does standard historical works of that time.  Bottom line, any article that asserts that a minor Errol Flynn film "caused immeasurable harm to the American conscience" has simply lost its bearings.69.106.75.244 (talk) 19:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Plot" and general tone
Talk:Murder of Tammy Homolka

message: I'm a bit confused.  The article says her date of death was 24 December 1990.  The following paragraph refers to 23 December 1990 as "less than two weeks" before her 16th birthday.  One day is definitely less than two weeks, but why is it worded this way?  Could one of the dates be wrong? -Etoile 19:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: The article gives up to three different substances for drugging her besides the alcohol.
"...Karla Homolka and her fiancé, Paul Bernardo, plied Tammy with Halcion, a sedative, and raped her."
"She eventually conceded, obtained a bottle of Halothane (a liquid general anesthetic) from the veterinary clinic where she worked, what would later be used to sedate Tammy during the rape."
"On December 23, 1990, Tammy was drugged with a combination of sleeping pills and alcohol, passing out in the family room in the basement of the Homolka house."
If by "sleeping pills" Halcion is meant, it should be made explicit. However, that still leaves the Halothane vs. the Halcion and the possibility that both were used. -- Kjkolb 17:21, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Halcion is not a general anesthetic. It is a brand name for a benzodiazepine derivative called triazolam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.5.15 (talk • contribs)  utcursch | talk 08:27, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halcion... 

message: I was on the verge of removing this text, but I guess it's worth waiting another 24 hours to see if anyone can sort it out.  If so beware of citing sources based, directly or indirectly, on this article. 
All the best: Rich Farmbrough  13:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation needed from 2007 and 2013
Talk:Leif Eriksson

message: Please discuss this move first, you might have good reasons, but in that case, it has to be done with consensus and in a slight different way. Thank you. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 19:41, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, when you cut-and-paste, you break the article history. Please discuss a proposed move at the other article title's talk page. Mak (talk) 19:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can fix that, see discussion at Talk:Leif Ericson. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 19:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please discuss this move first