lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Baden-Württemberg

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—2601:18D:880:C8E0:254F:8EE8:6445:9487 (talk) 05:40, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, and they appear to be correct. (The location is identified on Google Maps as "Landesmittelpunct von Baden-Württemberg".) If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deor (talk • contribs) 11:12, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: I believe the link to Alemannic separatism in the dialects section to be a bit odd. Alemannic separatism has nothing to do with dialects spoken within Baden-Württemberg – btw not all dialects spoken are Alemannic. Furthermore Alemannic separatism is already mentioned in the article about Alemannic German. Regional sensitivities are a big deal in Germany (some would even like to see Baden to separate from Württemberg), so I do not want to delete the link right away. Since the creation of the state wasn't exactly a “love marriage” anyway a reference could be made somewhere else in the article?--Catflap08 (talk) 09:02, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Alemannic separatism]] 

message: There was an active rivalry between the  municipalities of Furtwangen and Donaueschingen for the claim of being home to the "official" source of the Danube since the 1950s, sometimes with the involvement of the government of the state of Baden-Württemberg. 
Thus, in 1981 the state government granted Donaueschingen the request that the source in Furtwangen should no longer be labelled Donauquelle in official maps.Quellensammlung des Fürstenberg-Gymnasiums Donaueschingen: Zur Donauquelle , 2010, abgerufen am 30. Dezember 2012 (Quoted from the Source of the Danube wikipedia page). 71.220.219.16 (talk) 21:55, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of the Danube 

message: The statistics shown in the article seem a bit at odds with the official data published in 2011 (https://www.statistik-bw.de/Service/Veroeff/Monatshefte/20140503). Any clues? The article does not seem to take into account a very peculiar German issue which differentiates between faiths recognised under public law and those who are not. Those who are recognised do finance themselves, next to other sources of income, via taxes.--Catflap08 (talk) 19:10, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion
Talk:Lindisfarne

message: The OS maps call this island Holy Island, Lindisfarne appears to be an old name. I would like to change the lede to reflect this, is that OK? and can the map be used as the reference? Op47 (talk) 18:09, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The full title is "The Holy Island of Lindisfarne" so either "Holy Island" or "Lindisfarne" are acceptable abbreviations, neither is "the old name".  You might want to use the full title in the lead, but be aware that at least one editor regards using the official title as subjective and prefers the phrase "also known amongst some as Holy Island" so do try to avoid an edit war! Martin of Sheffield (talk) 15:46, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've run down references to the official name and the use of the shorter Holy Island so this should now be uncontroversial. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 19:20, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: Hello users, I am a student from the University of Bergamo and I am taking part in a project that consists in giving a contribution to Wikipedia pages (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/UNIBG/Heritage_studies_and_ICT). In this page in particular I added a few more details about the attack on the island by Vikings in 793 (the fate of the monks), about the date of burial of St Cuthbert 's body on the island and also about the wooden boats that can be seen today (including also a picture already existing in Wikipedia).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcava19 (talk • contribs) 17:51, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added small pieces of information
Talk:Nazi Party

message: I frequently edit pages, as I peruse them, to correct for idiom (for foreign language sourced articles, like this one) and other grammatical ambiguities and errata. (I do not have the resources available to create my own account at this time.) 
For instance, the phraseology of the first section would be better served if the conjunction either  was moved to modify the second element of the list (inferiority) rather than where it is, seemingly erroneously modifying the three items listed, thus the sentence ending: 
"excluding those deemed to be either political dissidents, physically or intellectually inferior, or of a foreign race (Fremdvölkische)." should be recast to say:
"excluding those deemed to be political dissidents, either physically or intellectually inferior, or of a foreign race (Fremdvölkische)." 
See? Much better. However, now I have spent an order of magnitude more effort to make a simple notification for someone else to read and act on this very simple edit. (I wonder how many people will read this and not bother before someone decides to act? I wonder who manages that editing process. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?) 118.210.101.232 (talk) 05:40, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not correct. Please see the FAQ and other banners at the top of this page. — Czello (music) 14:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The Nazi Party was considered “far-right” pursuant to the reliable sources cited. And that’s what we have to go by. Otherwise, it is considered original research. As for only allowing registered editors, it’s for good reason. To protect the article from rampant vandalism, which is common with Nazi related articles. Kierzek (talk) 15:43, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The problem with locking the page is the concomitant loss of incidental editing. 

message: Paul Wegener links to the wrong person. This is the correct link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Wegener_(Gauleiter) Soder86 (talk) 17:51, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Jamedeus (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 March 2024 

message: The emblem is wrong, it should be this one https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fc/NSDAP-Logo.svg/640px-NSDAP-Logo.svg.png Carulaa (talk) 15:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 April 2024 

message: The article mentions the article "Ein Nazi fährt nach Palästina" by name.
As an article by this name now exists, it would make sense to link it.
The article is protected so I can't do it. Editor8778 (talk) 12:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a link
Talk:Hot Grits

message: Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, NOT a dictionary, nor a trivia collection. Put this on the slashdot trolling page, or better yet, condense the slashdot trolling page and put it all on the slashdot page. Zocky 12:35 Jan 22, 2003 (UTC)
This page should be deleted. "Hot grits" does not refer to grits in general, and - as Zocky says - the Slashdot troll is not notable enough to have its own redirect. 81.151.13.155 03:47, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jacques Derrida

message: Influenced: David Foster Wallace  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1001:B02E:3E49:E106:B3FA:9EB4:C102 (talk) 01:16, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It is all just rubbish, but useful, because if you read anything that quotes him, or Heidegger too, you can just chuck away what you are reading. Esedowns (talk) 16:19, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Whew! That's very reassuring. I thought it was just me. EEng 17:52, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

text: The Criticism from Anglophone philosophers section does a good job of demolishing his would-be status as an philosopher. The quote of Roger Scruton says it all: "He's difficult to summarise because it's nonsense. He argues that the meaning of a sign is never revealed in the sign but deferred indefinitely and that a sign only means something by virtue of its difference from something else. For Derrida, there is no such thing as meaning – it always eludes us and therefore anything goes." Carlstak (talk) 23:07, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I had the opportunity to study under Roger Scruton during his tenure at Birkbeck, and I distinctly recall him expressing admiration for Derrida's intellect, even admitting to a sense of envy. Moreover, any earnest student delving into Derrida's philosophy understands that the core of deconstruction is to illustrate how meaning is perpetually deferred. 94.205.38.119 (talk) 15:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Which of course is vacuous bullshit masquerading as profundity, but what else is new? EEng 00:22, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Ecumenical

message: Wikipedia is not a dictionary -- needs work. -- Tarquin 13:59 Jan 22, 2003 (UTC)
I've filled it out somewhat.  Michael Hardy 19:17 Jan 22, 2003 (UTC)
"Catholics construe "the whole church" as including only Catholics."
Isn't this incorrect nowadays, following the Second Vatican Council and the efforts of popes such as John Paul II? David.Monniaux 09:02, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I merged this page w Ecumenism. See Talk:Ecumenism for future talk. Sam Spade  16:00, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Knitting needle

message: I recently purchased some lovely yarn, produced in Germany.  The closest thing I can find to suggested needle size is a box that says, "2,5-3".  I am deducing that this indicates us to use size 2-mm needles, but then what does the remaining "5-3" stand for?  I haven't, as yet, found any conversion charts that help clarify this for me.  Thank you for your help.  Prrlgrrl 01:17, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have answered this question on your talk page, Prrlgrrl. --Edna H. 07:21, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question on Needle Size Conversions, European to US 

message: I'm no expert, but I know that needles come in much smaller sizes than the 2mm size 0.  The smallest I've heard of is 00000000 (8x0), which is 0.5mm.  Should we include all the <0 sizes, or just note that they exist?
:If you could add a citation for that, it would be wonderful. DurovaCharge! 02:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also not really familiar with wiki standards and such.  I'm not sure I could find a great citation, but I've seen such needles for sale online.  I can't imagine that'd be sufficient as reference material, though.  What about the page at http://world.std.com/~kcl/kneedlesizecomparison.html ?  Would that be suitable?
In the states pretty much any JoAnn fabric store will sell a boxed set of needles from 1 down to 000. Being a sock knitter primarily I may come into contact with below zero sizes more often, but I feel them to be rather common. (At least, 00 and 000). Loggie (talk) 07:29, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gauges lower than zero 

message: Originally, sizes in the US were based on inches.  As a standard, the size 10 needle was one quarter inch in diameter.  Sizes above size 10 were successively one sixteenth inch larger.  Sizes smaller than 10 were successively one thirty-second smaller.  For example, size 11 was 5/16ths in diameter and size 12 was 3/8ths inch.  Size 9 was one thirty-second inch smaller at 7/32nds.  Et cetera.  My Flatley (talk) 15:43, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Sizes
Talk:Behaviorism

message: Whether it deserves its own section or its own page, it certainly does not belong in the Philosophy section. Indeed, the Philosophy section needs modification. While it does provide a link to the Logical behaviorism page (which, by the way, is woefully empty, which is surprising given just how much there is to say on the topic), there should at least be a brief discussion of what logical behaviorism is, and possibly how it relates to both methodological and ontological forms of behaviorism. This would probably also be an excellent place to include the criticisms launched against behaviorism by people like Hilary Putnam and Daniel Dennett. I would be happy to write this up myself if there's general agreement that these changes ought to be made. Yanssel (talk) 12:38, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Make the 21st-century behavior analysis section its own section?

message: This page should feature other behavior analytic techniques like habituation (desensitization/exposure therapy) in the classical conditioning section and counterconditioning (like covert (i.e., mindfulness, meditation) and overt (i.e., breathing, exercising) conditioning - although all of these behavior therapy techniques (including operant contingencies) can also be cognitive-behavioral. Further, CBTs is a discipline of behavior therapy that overlaps with behaviorism/behavior analysis and we should briefly discuss that somewhere in the body. ATC . Talk 22:39, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding other behavior analytic techniques like habituation and counterconditioning 

message: I was reviewing a recent edit by User:Bgeditor4 (Special:Diff/1112050665) where they added a brief paragraph regarding a behavioral neuroscience journal published by the APA in 1807. They seemed to use the publishing of the book and the supposed similarity between "behavioural psychology" and "behavioral neuroscience" to infer that research on behavioral psychology was conducted as early as 1807. I couldn't decide whether it would be acceptable to address this edit as unreferenced original research. PolyversialMind (talk) 00:43, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncertainty about a recent edit regarding experimental behavioral studies 

message: — Assignment last updated by Dkhora (talk) 19:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ANTH 193 - Behavioral Science in Practice

message: Behavioralism appears to be very similar. My instinct is that it's really the same but perhaps someone misheard the term or something? Thedonquixotic (talk) 00:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does this differ from Behavioralism?
Talk:Runoff

message: header 1     	header 2     	header 3
row 1, cell 1	row 1, cell 2	row 1, cell 3
row 2, cell 1	row 2, cell 2	row 2, cell 3
<nowiki>Insert non-formatted text here--98.122.136.2 (talk) 00:08, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Tarocchini

message: Distinguish Italian decks:
* Tarocco Piemontese -- a 78-card deck:
** used to play
*** Scarto
*** Four Handed Tarocchi
*** Mitigati
* Tarcocco Siciliano - 64 card deck
** 
*** trumps: 1 to 20 plus the additional Miseria and Fuggitivo
*** each suit has king (re), queen (donna), cavalier (cavallo), jack (fante) ace (asso) and pip cards from 5 to 10
*** AND the 4 and ace, in only the suit of coins.
* Italian Tarocco Bolognese
** 62 card deck
*** Minor Arcana consist of an ace, cards numbered from six to ten, and the four classic royal suits
*** The Major Arcana are similar to the ones in the Tarot of Marseilles.
** used to play
*** Ottocento
*** Terziglio
*** Millone
*** Mattazza
* which decks have which cards (which decks are subsets of other decks)
brain (talk) 02:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add 

message: Hi all, the foto in the infobox shows austrian Tarock-cards, which are quite different from italian cards. Therefore I shall remove them.  Best greetings from Vienna -- 85.127.105.129 (talk) 20:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fotograph infobox 

message: I have removed references to Partita to avoid confusion. Partita can refer to many tarocchi games played in Piedmont or Bologna. It originated in Bologna where it had several incarnations but these games aren't really played anymore. Piemontese Partita survives and its rules are simpler than tarocchini. Naturally, in Piedmont they play it with the Tarocco Piemontese but treat the lower trumps as equals like the moors of Tarocco Bolognese and remove six pip cards from each suit for a total of 54 cards. Piemontese Partita rules can be found here and here.--Countakeshi (talk) 11:37, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Partita
Talk:Leo Brouwer

message: I have deleted the horrible computer-translated text titled LEO BROUWER, GENIUS & MUSIC. that an anonymous user placed here. LEO BROUWER does not deserve such treatment. If whoever placed it would be so kind of adding the link for that webpage (which I assume must be in Spanish language) in this talk page, I can gladly look at it, translate it, and add selected segments to the article on Leo Brouwer. Regards, --AVM 14:34, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Computer translation

message: I wonder what the purpose is of such as long list of 'selected works' when there is a separate article 'List of compositions by Leo Brouwer' that is even shorter than the 'selected' list. I suggest the long list of selected works be removed from the main article and merged with the 'List of ...' article. – Aklein62 (talk) 16:30, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I renamed this section to 'Selected Compositions' and trimmed this list down to a few works that have their own pages. Aside from two works, the rest of the list was already on the main article (List of compositions by Leo Brouwer). I added the two missing works to the main article. VarjoGrAyJay 20:22, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Selected works' versus 'List of compositions' 

message: Could someone add a pronunciation of the last name Brouwer. I know it causes difficulty for many people around the world.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.141.144.155 (talk) 13:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name pronunciation
Talk:Futurama (New York World's Fair)

message: Good news - the copyright on NBG's book Magic Motorways was allowed to lapse hence the images of Futurama in that book are free use -  I checked.
Also reformatted some of the external links as references and got rid of the references tag.--Travelplanner (talk) 09:43, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pic added

message: No mention of modern commuting and trolleys?  174.22.191.171 (talk) 08:40, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social impacts?
Talk:Electrical network

message: Does anyone want me to draw eletric circuit symbols? -fonzy
:I have a whole bunch of them.  commons:User:Omegatron/Gallery#Modular_tables_of_images
:There's also a bunch at commons:Category:Electrical_symbols — Omegatron 15:09, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Need Circuit Symbol Pictures

message: I was just wondering which adjective to use: -ic or -ical? I thought I had found a rule:
electric: containing, producing, arising from, or actuated by electricity (narrow sense)
[also electrical in this case if the following noun begins with a vowel]
electrical: pertaining to electricity (broader sense)
--Gunnar (talk) 19:55, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electrical / Electric network
Talk:Napier Nomad

message: I've tried to clarify this article as it is a very complex engine, what has just occured to me is that the Naiad engine appears to have no combustion chambers, so it is no more than a giant supercharger. Need to come back and fix the text to confirm/clarify this as it is slightly wrong if this is the case. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 23:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A tricky one!

message: As the article is now:
< the axial compressor also drove the supercharger impeller >
but page 544 of reference 8 states, and the diagram clearly shows, that the impeller was driven by the crankshaft.
86.152.190.173 (talk) 00:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is one of several problems with this article. I've re-worded it a bit. The illustrations here aren't great either. The Flight article is very good, but remember that there were many variants of the Nomade during its development and even Flight were only allowed to see a couple of them, at the time. It's risky to make definitive statements about details of how the Nomad worked, because the chance is that there was always another version that had done it the other way. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:38, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomad 1 

message: This was much more than a mere clutch. It was a variable-ratio transmission, namely, a Beier variable-ratio gear.
86.3.108.41 (talk) 13:41, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomad II hydraulic clutch 

message: The article states, in a paragraph devoid of citations, that:
Thermal efficiency is given by 1-(Tx/Tp), where Tx is the exhaust temperature (any absolute scale) and Tp is the peak combustion temperature
Indeed it is, but what about Tx, and, in particular, the fraction Tx/Tp? The ratio of Tx to Tp is driven by the pressure ratio available for expansion, and this in turn is dependent on the pressure ratio on the compressor side of the engine. The Nomad was intended for economical long-range cruising (hence its name, we dare say) and had the form it did in order to achieve a high value of pressure ratio at cruise at altitude. Here the ambient pressure is low, so that high pressure ratios can be used without attaining high pressures. It was entirely beyond the state of the gas turbine art at the time to use similarly high pressure ratios. 195.194.10.62 (talk) 18:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Efficiency
Talk:Temperance movement

message: With few exceptions the § History section discusses the history of the movement in the United States only. This is just another example of an article being dominated by a narrow American focus. Of course the temperance movement was a worldwide movement, and so the existing article is largely unhelpful for non-American readers. For the time being I propose merging the text with Temperance movement in the United States, and leaving in place a short summary of the temperance movement along with the existing hatnote links to the respective national articles, i.e. Temperance movement in Australia, Temperance movement in India, Temperance movement in Ireland, Temperance movement in New Zealand, Temperance movement in Sri Lanka, Temperance movement in the United Kingdom, Temperance movement in the United States. Currently this article largely overlaps with the last linked article. --Hazhk (talk) 20:38, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are mentions of England, Canada, India, the United States, etc. in this article, not just the United States. I'd recommend that more content be added rather than merging everything to another article. I hope this helps. With regards, AnupamTalk 20:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 09:44, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge history section with US-specific article 

message: Per the discussion at the "Teetotalism" talk page, this article could be enhanced through the inclusion of a list of notable temperance activists. Msoul13 (talk) 15:07, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Figures
Talk:Gospel of John

message: The redirect Theology of John has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 07:06, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Theology of John]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The Jesus Seminar is WP:FRINGE (it was designed as the opposite pole of Christian fundamentalists). But I think it is true that John the Baptist was famous during his life, which wasn't the case for Jesus. There were plenty of miracle workers, Jesus was by no means special (when alive). tgeorgescu (talk)  21:10, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesus Seminar 

message: Since they obviously lack evidence in the first century. Tanengtiong0918 (talk) 20:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why they are so sure of that there was a final form 

message: The section of gnosticism feels weird in places. What does it mean to "forcefully argue" for example, and is this phrasing that satisfies NPOV? The whole section feels written as if its purpose were to argue against any connection to gnosticism. Not going to change it because maybe there's a good reason for these things, but I'd appreciate a second opinion. Not alexand (talk) 18:24, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious section on gnosticism