Talk:Romeo-class submarine

message: Additional information added for Type 033, 035, and 039.
Adeptitus 08:00, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: (First comments)

message: The article presently claims that out of a planned 560 submarines, 20 were constructed.  I don't think that can be correct at all, does the source say 560 or 56?2/\/\flaviu5 (talk) 03:06, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  560 submarines? 

message: The article claims the Romeo's were developed from the German Type XXI U-boat. That seems a bit thin; the Soviets may have used captured German technology to inform their immediate post-war designs (the Whiskey and Zulu classes) but the Romeo's were a development of them, not some 15-year-old WWII stuff. Does anyone have a citation for this claim? Xyl 54 (talk) 23:37, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: This page seems to be about two different subjects; the Soviet Romeo class and a related but different Chinese submarine class. They really should be on separate pages; if there are no objections I'll move the stuff on the Chinese Type 033 submarines and their derivatives to its own page. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:42, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Romeo-class submarine. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060619054734/http://www.sinodefence.com:80/navy/sub/033.asp to http://www.sinodefence.com/navy/sub/033.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060709084621/http://www.china-defense.com:80/naval/wuhan351/wuhan351.html to http://www.china-defense.com/naval/wuhan351/wuhan351.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:28, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've re-written the introduction to remove the (rather dubious) suggestion that the 633  Romeo submarine was based on the German Type XXI. It seems I flagged this as dubious a while ago, but the tag seems to have disappeared without any attempt to reply, or find a source to support the contention. So I have gone ahead and taken it out, for the reasons already stated. I trust everyone is OK with that. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:34, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious, again 

message: If the information on the new article can be sourced, it could be useful in a subsection in the main article. | Naypta✉ opened his mouth at 09:16, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Slava class]] 

message: The article on List of ships of the Egyptian Navy does not list the Romeo Class submarines. SO I'd asssum they are decomissioned. Wfoj3 (talk) 15:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Or sprung leaks and 'abandon ship!' in Arabic rang on the comm system. Those rust-buckets are old, old, old.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.111.9.62 (talk) 04:22, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romeo Class Submarines in the Egyptian navy