lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Helen Page Camp

message: Almost empty infobox rv as per WP:MOS: “The most important group to consider are the casual readers of Wikipedia, who will never do any significant editing. Infobox templates that contain many blank fields, question marks and unknowns present an unprofessional appearance, diminishing Wikipedia’s reputation as a high-quality encyclopedia.” Quis separabit? 02:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox rv
Talk:Cape Verde swift

message: Nothing at Flickr. Richard001 (talk) 00:08, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/October 2007

message: How come the article on "Truthiness" is being featured on October 18, dispite the fact it was requested it should appear on October 17? ISD 05:23, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Truthiness

message: Hi, I have a little question. I have noticed many featured articles that I've never seen in "today's featured article". Does it mean they will become "today's featured article" one day?
Can an article become featured a long time before it becomes "today's featured article" ? YemeniteCamel 18:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured articles
Talk:International Classification for Standards

message: Why is it relevant, in /any/ way, that 999 is a Kaprekar number? And why is it explained that 98 + 1 is 99? Am I missing something here? --Tunheim (talk) 19:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it seems irrelevant to this article that 999 happens to be a Kaprekar number. Can we take that fact out of this article and move it to 999 (number)? --DavidCary (talk) 17:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaprekar number
Talk:Hunter Mountain Fire Tower

message: I've adapted some of the text of this article for a more general Catskill fire tower article I'm drafting.  It still needs a lot of work, and any editors reading this are invited to offer suggestions and improvements.  Thank you!--~TPW 14:01, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catskill fire towers 
Talk:Jiří Džmura

message: I asked in my edit summary why the text spelling differed from the article name, and why redlinks existed at Jiri Dzmura and at Jiri Dzurma.  Now I'm wondering why User:Bendono created a redirect from the wrong spelling Jiri Dzurma and left the correct Jiri Dzmura red?  Gene Nygaard 05:48, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the article originally used the spelling Jiří Džurma. Right or not, redirects are cheap. If you disagree with it, feel free to nominate it for deletion; I will not be offended. As for the other redirect, I got busy. It has been created now. Bendono 08:28, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redlinks
Talk:Bead probe technology

message: This article needs serious reconstruction. Poor grammar, poor image quality, puh-leeze. Ginbot86 (talk) 00:50, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is messed up 

message: Several of the references had broken links which have been fixed. Additional references and links have been added for clarity and included references to earlier examples of the technique such as Waygood Bumps and solder bumps. An alternative technology section has also been added for interest including reference links. Also a general tidy up was performed.Miffo7uk (talk) 17:17, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Update
Category talk:Isra'iliyyat narrators

message: Hello: Is there any article or information that explains what an "Isra'iliyat Salaf" is so that :Category:Isra'iliyat Salaf makes sense to those who have no idea what it means and can be "in on the secret", and why the articles that are in it are there? Thank you. IZAK 06:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for an explanation and definition
Talk:Perfectmatch.com

message: This article seems to be similar to other articles using "online dating" as a company type.  It seems written in similar fashion.  Not sure it qualifies as an advertisement unless others do as well.   Compare to its mentioned competitor  Eharmony, which read similarly in original edits.  Also Match.com  
I disagree on the reads as an advertisement unless those articles do as well.  
It does however need additional non-pov information in order to avoid additional flags.
Richseattle 06:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

message: The website appears to have closed (tried to access on 2015-11-09).   There is a link to FriendFinder.com but that site seems to be just a dating site.   FreeFlow99 (talk) 10:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Website has closed
Talk:Sandy McDonald

message: Should this article even exist?  Just because you're the father of somebody notable doesn't mean that you yourself are notable.  I say this should be deleted.TheBigBlueBox 06:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that holding the position of Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland makes one notable.  It's true that not all past Moderators have pages (yet), but all in the past decade do (see List of Moderators of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland).  The fact that his son is also famous isn't material, really. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 11:34, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Berwick, East Sussex

message: I should be interested to know the evidence for the pronunciation 'BUR-wick'. It is not recorded in J.C.Wells's Longman Pronouncing Dictionary (200) nor Daniel Jones's Everyman's English Pronouncing Dictionary (1977; revised A.C.Gimson), which are the authorities I usually use. I want to include this information in a Guide I am writing to usage in the English language. If it is the standard pronunciation among the locals, I of course accept that; but it would be interesting to know whether  there is any degree of variation, in or around the village or its area.
MacAuslan 07:12, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Depopulation

message: I think this article has scope for considerable expansion but I don't have time to expand on it any further right now. I've introduced it because I need a basic explanation to link to from other pages.
I will be trying to add some more to it in coming days and weeks, but I expect some other folks will be wanting to step up and contribute to it as well. Gatoclass 07:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Agriculture

message: I am currently working on agriculture in Turkey but am unsure what the structure should be - any suggestions? Chidgk1 (talk) 09:46, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure of "Agriculture in xxxcountry" articles? 

message: If you have any idea please suggest at Talk:Agriculture_in_Turkey#Any_suggestions_for_better_lead_picture? Chidgk1 (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for better lead pic for [[Agriculture in Turkey]] 

message: Hi all
I've been adding some graphics to various articles and found one of the most unloved articles I've ever seen on Wikipedia, Agriculture in Burundi. If anyone has any motivation to work on it I'm sure it would be appreciated by readers. 
Thanks
John Cummings (talk) 15:57, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice, Thank you very much. Zulfikar Chaniago (talk) 05:49, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Agriculture in Burundi]] 

message: Hi everyone, I'm cleaning up the major article on Cattle, one of the project's most-read, with a view to getting it to Good Article status. I've brushed up the worst of the writing and sorted out the uncited material, but the article does not have a clear and logical structure, nor does it seem to be well balanced. The structure is quite unlike that of Sheep , for instance, though the situation here may be different, and Horse  has yet another structure, arguably better laid out. Suggestions for improvement of structure and balance would be very welcome. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Cattle]]
Talk:Shenandoah-Dives Mill

message: This claim is wholly inaccurate, according to sources it was very busy after WW2, and in the 1950s and again in the 60s the mill had a considerable refit to more-or-less its current configuration. By the 1970s it was producing in the region of 1000 tons per day and was quite active well into the 80s. I do not have the time nor inclination to edit this article, but maybe someone might be interested to make the requisite corrections using the information in this source, which gives a full account of the timeline of the mill:
https://memory.loc.gov/master/pnp/habshaer/co/co0900/co0922/data/co0922data.pdf ▫Bad▫harlick♠ 21:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "shut down in 1945, operated sporadically until 1992"
Talk:Penenden Heath

message: The penalty for witchcraft in England was hanging not burning at the stake, although if the accusation was of husband-murder this could be punished as petty-treason which could be punished by burning. So I was surprised to be told that there were medieval witch burnings. When I checked the 2 reeences neither support this --Streona (talk) 20:16, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You're quite right. Have fixed the text - a fault of (my own) misreading of the sources. Thanks for pointing this out Dick G (talk) 21:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Witch Burnings
Talk:Supra

message: I'm talking about the changes that were made on August 21, 2007 on this page, as it says:
*"Supra is a Latin word meaning "above" and may refer to:
**Supra (feast), an important part of Georgian social culture and so on..."
Well, saying lightly it's just incorrect, because the Latin word Supra mayn't, even cann't refer to Georgian word 'supra'. It's stupidity, how can a Latin word meaning 'above' refer to a Georgian word meaning 'tablecloth', they have no same origin even sound different. And after all this, i'll say nothing about the Sydney University Postgraduate Representative Association, where 'SUPRA' is just an abbreviation and nothing more :)).
That's why i'm gonna give this changes back, like this:
:Supra may refer to:
*The Latin word Supra meaning - "above";
*The Georgian traditional feast - Supra meaning "tablecloth" and s.o.
P.S. sorry for stupidity, i couldn't restrain myself.
Kind regards --Rastrelli f 07:36, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, so let's just delete that bit. Did you really need to add the redlink and dictionary definition back in? See also Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). Ewlyahoocom 08:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the changes that took place on this page! 

message: In real estate, the houses usually have these lockboxes called Supra Or Supra iBox...  -Untraceable2U (talk) 08:51, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Supra iBox
Talk:Crystal Ballroom (Portland, Oregon)

message: We should note the current capacity of the Crystal Ballroom. And what size venue is this? 216.228.168.208 (talk) 16:53, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good suggestions.  I'm having trouble finding authoritative technical data, but I've added what I found so far.  —EncMstr (talk) 18:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Capacity

message: * Portland's Crystal Ballroom celebrates 96th birthday, 2010-01-31, Steve Beaven, The Oregonian
tedder (talk) 03:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ref for expansion 

message: *  "Ringler's History" (PDF). McMenamins  Previous is correct link to replace dead link for Reference #2 ( "Ringler's History" (PDF). McMenamins. Retrieved 2007-10-05.[dead link]) I do not understand how to edit the link! Someone else can fix? Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yappyfloater (talk • contribs) 21:29, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the link. Valfontis (talk) 16:35, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Pilot (One Tree Hill)

message: The individual episode articles for One Tree Hill (TV series) are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines.  Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:List of One Tree Hill episodes#Episode article review. Thanks. -- Jack Merridew 10:18, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of One Tree Hill episode article review 

message: I have created three new templates Template:One Tree Hill episode, Template:Infobox One Tree Hill season 1 episode list and Template:Infobox One Tree Hill season episode list. Please discuss below whether you believe the co-stars field should or should not be removed and why. I have created it and am using it in this article, though I am more than happy to remove the field if its entry is too large. Hpfan9374 08:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Tree Hill episode Infobox 

message: I have recently submitted this article for Peer Review, to find ways to expand the article, and modify it so that it can reach a higher class. Hpfan9374 09:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have took note of the Peer review, and have made the appropriate changes. Hpfan9374 06:12, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 

message: I have recently submitted this article as a good article nominee, as I have made the appropriate changes from the peer review, there may be a few further edits that are required to pass this.. Hpfan9374 06:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article 

message: Hi there!  Thanks for submitting this nominating this article as a Good Article.  Unfortunately, I'm quick-failing the article without a full review because it's pretty clearly not going to meet the GA criteria.  For one thing, I've tagged it as being written in an "in universe" style, meaning that some sections of it are written as if the fictional events have really happened, rather than being an objective summary of the plot, the production, and the impact of the episode.  For example, the entire Plot section is not written in the appropriate style.  For examples of what's a better style for the article, check out some of the Good Articles under the television episodes subsubsubsubsection on the Good Articles page.  If you have any questions, please send me a message on my talk page.  Thanks for your work on the article to this point.  Cheers! Esrever 03:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick failed GA normination
Talk:Sorensen

message: This page should be a separate article and not redirect to Sørensen. --Troels Nybo 07:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand, there seem to be plenty of people whose name are spelled as Sørensen when in Denmark, and Sorensen abroad, due to typographic limitations. E.g. "Henning Sorensen, a multilingual Danish journalist with Canadian connections" ( http://ats.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/70/5/1746?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=pneumonectomy&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=100&resourcetype=HWFIG ) - I'd suspect that back home in Denmark they wrote his name with a "ø".... Vmenkov (talk) 02:08, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Millimetre

message: :One inch is 2.54 centimetres, and each centimetre has 10 millimetres. So therefore, 25.4 millimetres per inch. TehPoep 08:28, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is, divide by 25.4. JIMp talk·cont 03:57, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: How do you convert the millimetre into inches?

message: I was just about to add a picture to the right hand side, as I've seen in many Wikipedia articles but, as I read an article on adding images to Wikipedia I realized that you have to be a rocket scientist or no less than a genius to do so. So I'll just leave this here 
http://www.corbisimages.com/stock-photo/royalty-free/42-21214121/ruler?popup=1&caller=enlargement
and hope that a rocket scientists adds it, or adds something better explaining the top as inches and CM and the bottom as MM. 
:)
I really think Wikipedia could and should make it a lot easier to add images and captions to articles. 
DiscoElf (talk) 00:14, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The link you give doesn't work for me.-gadfium 00:43, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: How about this one? --WikiMichi (talk) 23:31, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A picture is needed 

message: Please discuss these changes at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Measurement#Changes to the ledes of many SI-related articles.  Martinvl (talk) 18:29, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no discussion there specifically about the update I made to this article, so I've restored my edits as accurate and supported. If the discussion there does develop, and a consensus emerges which conflicts with the changes that I've made here, perhaps then would be the time to discuss the appropriate further changes to make here. -- de Facto (talk). 12:54, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revocation of 19 November 2011 

message: How do you converted to millimeters to metres? Esinako (talk) 20:08, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: To convert from millimetres to metres you divide by 1000, or equivalently, multiply by 0.001. This can be easily done by moving the decimal point 3 places to the left, adding leading zeros as required. So 3141.6 mm is 3.1416 m and 27 mm is 0.027 m.GrahamN-UK (talk) 10:48, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  physical science 

message: I hear sometimes that the long names of millimetre and centimetre are considered a burden by imperial users. In Turkish sometimes "milim" and "santim" ( "millim" and "centim" ? ) are used in daily speech. I'm not familiar with Wikipedia guidelines but maybe it can be added as a suggestion or just a note.
:The abbreviations of mm and cm already exist. Blitterbug 20:02, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate shorter spelling
Talk:Blip-to-scan ratio

message: Under the heading "Aircraft Projects", the following phrase concerns me:  "Although interception proved difficult, it was only a matter of time before one of their aircraft "got lucky" and a U-2 was shot down."   If this was referring to the Gary Powers U2 mission, he wasn't shot down by an aircraft but by a surface to air missile.  The only other reference to a U2 being shot down was Rudolph Anderson's over Cuba in 1962.  As yet I haven't been able to reference how, yet but I'd imagine it was also via surface to air missile.  If these can be better referenced by someone then this sentence will need to be changed.   Malloc 10:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I intended the statement to suggest that the Soviets would eventually get one of their interceptors into range for a kill, with enough practice. A MiG-19 in a zoom climb armed with long range rockets might just do the trick, for instance. That is what I meant by "their aircraft", although I guess that should have been more clear. Maury 16:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  U2 shot down by aircraft? 

message: Outstanding explanation of relevant RADAR basics. Thanks for this. Didn't expect it here. One minor point though: The so-called "Cold War" periode is quite long and ends just after 1990. There are of course huge differences in RADAR technology between 1950 and 1990. Even Phased Array RADARs were availlible in the end ... even the Sowjet Union had them in their MiG-31 interceptors at one point. Such electronic RADAR systems with multiple beam ability and digital data processing have of course much more complicated features and limitations. A young reader of the current version of the article could remain under the impression that in the nineteen eighties we still had much more limited systems. So I suggest in some places to replace the vague term "Cold War" with more precise timing information, like a decade or i.e. "around 1965" or "during the Vietnam war".
JB. --92.195.88.174 (talk) 21:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cold War
Talk:Cornelis Krayenhoff

message: I have made extensive edits, mostly of a textual nature, to improve grammar and vocabulary, but also to correct a few mistranslations from the Dutch article. For instance, the Dutch article states clearly that Krayenhoff did not take the commission to organize the inundations around Amsterdam in 1787, so I have substituted the correct translation. In this I depend completely on the Dutch article. Could someone please supply the necessary references? Another mistranslation was that Krayenhoff died on his birthday (!) though that is blatantly contradicted by the dates given in the article. So I corrected this also, substituting the Dutch version. I did insert a few referenced passages about Krayenhoff's contribution to the transfer of Amsterdam to the Batavian cause on January 19, 1795, and about his role during and after the Anglo-Russian invasion of 1799.--Ereunetes (talk) 20:44, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extensive edit
Talk:Nigel Strutt

message: Thanks, ArielGold and Andplus, for your copyediting (I know I need it sometimes!) but I do not understand the distaste for redlinks - if a topic is notable and Wikipedia should have an article on it, having a redlink helps to build the web.
Someone may one day write an article on Strutt & Parker, property consultant, land agent, John James Strutt, 2nd Baron Rayleigh, Camp 41, National Economic Development Council for Agriculture, the Advisory Council for Agriculture and Horticulture, the British Friesian Cattle Society, or the Massey-Ferguson Award (or articles may already exist, which just need redirects) and now this article won't be linked to them.  Just my opinion. -- !! ?? 09:52, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not me, mate. At least not intentionally. I occasionally add red links (probably because I'm too crap to find the associated article) but I don't remember removing one. I can't see a problem with them, they are like a flashing notice to fill the missing article. Andplus 10:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Network 7

message: 81.174.146.64 09:17, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BAFTA? 

message: The use of “innovative” without any support dosen’t sound encyclopædic, but that aside, the description is followed by a statement that it was influenced by “Max Headroom” and “Tiswas” – so therefore “derivative”? I’m not saying that it wasn’t innovative, butit needs to be shown *why* it was so… Jock123 (talk) 11:00, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Innovative? 

message: An editor has twice removed an entry from the 'Spoofs' section of this article, namely "Spitting Image featured a Network 7 spoof where an interviewer asked God to sum up the meaning of life in 9 seconds." - at first claiming that this was unsourced (which is true - like the rest of the section), secondly claiming that it was a "spoof of various programmes, including Def II and the Chart Show" - which is incorrect. Spitting Image did spoof Def II and The Chart Show, and it's one of the clips you get if you type 'spitting image network 7' into YouTube. [] - However, that's not the spoof that is mentioned here, which certainly did exist and is well-remembered - for example it is cited on the cookd and bombd forums (Wikipedia does not allow a direct link) as being one of the clips that are frequently pulled out when Network 7 is discussed on other programmes.The fact that it is a brief moment in a copyrighted television series, which makes it hard to reference with a link, but the sketch in question is present on the DVD release [] of the series. Bonusballs (talk) 12:38, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Right at the top of the editing box it says "Encyclopedic content must be verifiable". The spoof referred to was an episode that seemed to spoof various programmes, including Def II and the Chart Show. The spoof also never referred to Network 7, although it DID refer to Def II (in the musical number with Janet Street Porter). Some people seem to think this episode was a spoof of Network 7. That's fine. But where's the source? A Youtube video and forum discussion are not reliable sources. 86.139.113.119 (talk) 17:09, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  It can be verified by viewing the correct sketch on the commercially released DVDs. The 'God' interview is conducted about 18m50s into episode 2 of series 5. [] For that reason, I've reverted your removal of the content from the article. Bonusballs (talk) 20:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spitting Image Spoof