lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jonah crab

message: — Assignment last updated by GrillinBubbles (talk) 14:55, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Invertebrate Zoology
Talk:Journal of Crustacean Biology

message: http://www.brill.com/news/brill-publish-two-prominent-society-journals-biology Brill is the new publisher of JCB --92.195.26.210 (talk) 07:57, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: and: Frequency isn't quarterly anymore. 6 issues a year. --92.195.26.210 (talk) 08:05, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Psyllid

message: I am not sure what taxon this article is supposed to cover. The text begins with "psyllids", which would mean Psyllidae, but the taxobox lists Psylloidea as the topic of the article, with Psyllidae being a subdivision thereof. To confuse matters further, Psyllidae redirects back to this article, despite the presence of other families in the superfamily. Can someone please confirm whether the text is specific to Psyllidae, or whether it does indeed cover the whole superfamily Psylloidea? If it's a mixture, then the article will need to be split. --Stemonitis 07:26, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm actually a little more concerned that "Psyllidae" redirects to "jumping plant louse" rather than vice versa. I mean, really? Common name should NOT have priority over the scientific name for the critter group. Aderksen (talk) 15:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

text: Glad that someone seems to have done the split already. Now if only we could get a taxonomist in here to sift out the psylloids from the psyllids. Aderksen (talk) 15:08, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomic limits of article 

message: There are seven items in the References list that are not actually referenced in the text. They all appear to relate to the last paragraph. I can fix this, but if there is a total rewrite in preparation, as requested in the previous section, I don't want to spend time fixing this version. Thoughts?
IAmNitpicking (talk) 20:03, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unlinked references
Talk:Keeled skimmer

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:2014.07.18.-16-Schwarzbach Woellnau--Kleiner Blaupfeil-Maennchen.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 7, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-11-07. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:2014.07.18.-16-Schwarzbach Woellnau--Kleiner Blaupfeil-Maennchen.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Marvel Mystery Comics

message: The information above about MPFW potentially being a fake is very interesting indeed.  I have never seen anything about this not being legit before.  Of course, the Overstreet guide has been my main source.  Are there any links to discussion on the web that might point to this being a fake?  I do remember the first year it came out in the Overstreet guide as a major find.  It always did seem a little fishy to me that no one had remembered it before that moment. Leamanc (talk) 00:44, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More info, please

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:05, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  16:28, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: I'm confused. This comic was published in October of 1939. Whiz Comics #2 debuted from Fawcett in December of the same year, featuring Captain Marvel, after Bill Parker and C.C. Beck had thrown around the names "Captain Thunder" and "Captain Marvelous." Was it just a coincidence that both landed on Marvel, or was something else going on?
Klayman55 (talk) 22:17, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Missing Piece of the Puzzle
Talk:Kentucky cave shrimp

message: What three counties is it found?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by KyNephi (talk • contribs) 06:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three counties? 
Talk:Lackey moth

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Malacosoma neustria Caterpillar.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 7, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-02-07. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Malacosoma neustria Caterpillar.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Template talk:Expert subject category

message: I try to fix this in the template, but apparently I can't make it work, so I used AWB to add things like  Law to the :Category:Pages needing expert attention from Law experts. Maybe it could be fixed by substituting the whole template but this may not be desirable for other reasons.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 16:40, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I see what you mean. Not sure what would be the best way to fix that. --Brad Beattie (talk) 16:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alphabetizing
Talk:Large red damselfly

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Large red damselfly (Pyrrhosoma nymphula) male Dry Sandford.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for June 21, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-06-21. Any improvements or maintenance to this article should be made before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:31, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Large red damselfly (Pyrrhosoma nymphula) male Dry Sandford.jpg]] scheduled for POTD 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Large red damselfly (Pyrrhosoma nymphula) female fulvipes 2.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for July 11, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-07-11. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 13:59, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Larvicide

message: Hi  That's better because the other was even longer, but this is still longer than the recommended 40 characters: It's 84! Could we cut this down even further? Maybe "Insecticide against the larval stage" which is 36? I just made that up. IDK. Invasive Spices (talk) 19:33, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, go ahead. I had forgotten about the 40 character recommendation. Thanks! NOLA1982 (talk) 19:38, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Short desc
Talk:Lasius

message: It's odd that there are zero results from Google Scholar if one searches for Lasius flavoniger although there should be a recent (1992) publication and there is an entry in ITIS. There are also no results for schulzi and breviscapus. Icek (talk) 10:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Google Scholar results 

message: What is the meaning of "boreal" in "boreal formicine ants"? The wikilink goes to a disambiguation page; I don't see an obvious candidate in the list of meanings given there.  --Lambiam 14:52, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boreal? 

message: As I am new to editing on Wikipedia, I do not know how to flag a factually incorrect image. The "Moisture Ant-Lasius" image added by JJ Grieve is misidentified: the ant is actually Formica pacifica, a common ant in the Pacific Northwest. I will refrain from describing how the genera Formica and Lasius may be separated unless asked. I would very much like to see the image moved out of the Lasius page. Thank you.
Aphaenogaster (talk) 06:09, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I know nothing about entomology but from the little I was able to glean from a university extension  data sheet] I had my doubts too.  I'd say go ahead and remove the image. --ChetvornoTALK 00:10, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed it. --ChetvornoTALK 13:30, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uploaded image misidentified
Talk:Lateral giant interneuron

message: I am confused by the cryptic sentence ending the penultimate paragraph of the article: "The LG bypasses the main neural system that controls locomotion, thus shortening the reaction time."  Normal "locomotion" in crayfish (and other astacids) is with their legs, not their tails.  The Natantia (and in some circumstances astacids) use their swimmerettes when off substrate, but "tail flipping" is usually reserved for escape, not routine locomotion (some squat lobsters excepted).  Boudrias, MA (2013) "Swimming fast and furious: Body and limb propulsion at higher Reynolds numbers"  in Watling, L, Thiel, M The Natural History of the Crustacea vol. 1. Functional Morphology and Diversity. Oxford Univ. Press pp 319-336--Dragonfly360 (talk) 03:36, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear reference to "bypassing the main neural system"
Talk:Leaf miner

message: Whilst this article uses the form "Leaf miner" from the page title downwards, all of the reference materials used are of the form "Leafminer". Is there a consensus as to which is appropriate? NinjaKid (talk) 22:43, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Leaf miner" Vs "Leafminer"

message: Is "leaf miner" analogous to "caterpillar", a term given to the larval stage of certain insects? Or is the adult still a leaf miner? Are the little critters in the leaves "leaf miners", or are they "leaf miner larvae"? Jonathan Tweet (talk) 20:02, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  does "leaf miner" refer to the insect or just to the larval stage 

message: A good resource for this article would be Charley Eiseman's Leafminers of North America publication. Friesen5000 (talk) 23:39, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leafminers of North America
Talk:Leafhopper

message: Isn't the taxobox image an aphid? --Kaz 18:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aphid? 

message: I think it is an Anthopper  lol  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.20.144.234 (talk) 20:31, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anthopper? 
Talk:Leptinotarsa

message: there are hints that Doryphora (beetle) may be a synonym of Leptinotarsa.--Estopedist1 (talk) 18:56, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no evidence for such a synonymy as far as I'm aware; several recent publications e.g. Chaboo et al. (2014) indicate it to be a valid genus with species in Central and South America. I suspect this assumption comes from North American species such as Leptinotarsa decemlineata being former members of Doryphora, but one species being transferred to another genus doesn't mean all of them are. Monster Iestyn (talk) 21:09, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Doryphora as a synonym?
Talk:Leptoconops torrens

message: Currently, the reference reads: 
Bohart Museum of Entomology, University of California, Davis, "No-see-ums," http://bohart.ucdavis.edu/bohart.asp?s=insects&f=noseeum, 7/26/02.
That's a dead link. However, I did find a useful document with same title here (without any date). 
I don't know if it's the same version as the original, but it's useful to readers. So I may edit the References section in a somewhat non-standard way. If someone prefers a different solution, please do it! Oaklandguy (talk) 00:43, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference from Bohart Museum of Entomology 

message: Hello! Great job so far on this article, you have some great info, citations, and links to other Wikipedia pages. I added a section to the lead section to provide a bit more information on the fly. Try to cite a source in the second paragraph of the lead section. Overall, I think you could work on this section a little more to include some more interesting facts about the fly that would spur people to keep reading. Also, I think it would be helpful to put the first name of "Townsend" in and add a link if he has a Wikipedia page. I also switched larva and adult in the physical description as I think it makes more sense to talk about larva before the adult. I made some minor grammar edits but overall, I found nothing major. The next thing I would do is to try to flesh out the sections a little more because they are mostly quite short. In the physical description instead of just stating that it is similar to another fly, you could talk more in-depth about its appearance. I would especially try to write more in the mating section, because the one sentence does not give a great oversight into the whole mating process. Overall this is a great start but needs some more details to become an excellent Wikipedia article. Christina.lindberg (talk) 21:56, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Editing
Talk:Under One Roof (Singapore TV series)

message: Should this be filled in now that the entire show has stopped being produced? I'm not familiar with this show, as I'm not that old. Would someone fill this in? GavinTing 12:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of episodes 

message: Under One Roof was also a 1995 series set in Seattle staring James Earl Jones which ran on CBS for 4 episodes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.181.134.212 (talk) 20:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other shows called Under One Roof 
Talk:Leptostraca

message: If there are extinct phyllocarids other than leptostracans, shouldn't Phyllocarida be a separate page?--Gunnar Mikalsen Kvifte (talk) 20:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extinct phyllocarids 

message: I've noticed that that the Spanish page is much more detailed than ours, perhaps we could translate and move some information over him?
~BoN  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:21C9:6300:7C65:FE9A:52B7:3C32 (talk) 01:48, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish Languadge Page
Talk:Lerp (biology)

message: Pardalote birds feed almost exclusively on lerps. 2001:8003:E41C:1C01:A94E:4889:C6A3:7E5E (talk) 12:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lerps and Pardalotes. 

message: Hello, it would be nice if someone could add the information where in the world (the animals that make) these occur - solely in Australia, or also in other regions/continents?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:3033:212:1F5A:6515:A1D9:D452:B11F (talk) 12:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where?
Talk:Clearance rate

message: What does it mean "a charge being laid" - doesn't explain the termed "cleared". This definition is like solving a riddle with another riddle.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:243:F00:14EC:60CA:97F4:D52B:CF78 (talk) 07:47, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: A 'charge being laid' means making an arrest and charging someone. The clearance rate in this context is the percentage of crime (or a type of crime) for which the police arrest and charge someone. 50.206.190.178 (talk) 18:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clearance definition needs work
Talk:Limacodidae

message: If you look up Olona sp., Limacodidae, you get no results in wikipedia.
Reasoning: They don't want to "LOOK AT THE FUNKY BOY GO"
But, seriously, this is a species of bug. It must have some kind of documentation in wikipedia.
:Well, it does have some kind of documentation, here. You'll see that there are well over 100 limacodid genera including Olona that don't have their own articles yet. Maybe some day someone will get around to it, but it doesn't appear to be on anyone's priority list at the moment, so you'll likely be waiting a while. Dyanega (talk) 18:13, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need a wikipedia page for: Olona sp., Limacodidae
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/IPhone

message: The phone may not exist yet beyond rumor and speculation, but what does deffinitely exist is rumor and speculation. The page should exist if for no other reason than to present the phenomenon which is the hype behind the possibility of Apple making a phone\mp3 player.
:I actually agree with the above person. See the iProduct, for example. -Mysekurity 01:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, there might be something to that... (JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 13:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

message: I wish there was some way things like this could be curated, things come on so fast. A Guy into Books (talk) 20:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  - 

message: hilarious in hindsight... — pythoncoder  (talk | contribs) 22:23, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting how they referred to it only as a "telephone". Calling a cellphone a telephone now just seems a bit off.  Nixinova  T  C  08:53, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

text: Perfect example of WP:TOOSOON. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 01:31, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Because this deletion discussion predates creation protection/salting the only way of preventing recreation after the AFD was to blank the page at this title and fully protect it. Amazingly this means the page as it was when it was nominated for this deletion discussion still exists in the history of iPhone, for anyone interested This is what the page looked like when it was brought here. Looking at the article as it was then (A paragraph of guesswork and a mostly unsourced list of rumours) it's fairly obvious why it was deleted. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 21:46, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

text: Just goes to show how old wikipedia truly is. This was around before 9/11 happened. (JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 13:17, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is on [[WP:1DAY]]
Talk:Trent Easton

message: It can be debated whether Easton knows the true identity of Mr. Blonde. Indeed, Easton was not directly contacted by the Skedars, [...] he is seen interacting with several blonde individuals at the same time. The fact that he wouldn't ask himself why they all look exactly the same either proves that he is stupid or that he is too preoccupied with his interests to dare raise the issue.
Easton never refers once to the eventuality of an extraterrestrial existence. [...] Yet, the fact that he seems in control of the military facility should make him aware of the presence of Maians being dissected inside its very walls. A possible explanation to this may be that Easton is perfectly aware of an extraterrestrial life form, but that he doesn't know the blonde individuals are themselves an alien species.
To that I have to say: Yes it's all debatable. Given the facts, revealed in the Background information ingame (Hacker's Central) and the behaviour of Trent, I would put it this way:
Trent knew there were Maians, and Skedar (and propably he knew about the Cetans). But he didn't knew that Mr. Blone is one of the Skedar. As I got it from the ingame texts, Easton and de Vries think of Blonde as a middleman who speaks for the Skedar, but is human - that'd explain why Trent called him 'Skandinavian freak' (the Carrington Institute factfile sais he's "A scandinavian in the midd-20s" untill you finish the Crashside-Level.
That Trent knew about the Maians is imo indicated by his statement "There will be no outside help for Mr. Carrington" - in addition to that, the guy in the Area 51 - Escape Intro sais "Director Easton will hear about this, young Lady!" wich means Easton is as Head of NSA also Head of Area 51 and thus has to know about extraterrestrial life - at least of the existence of the Maians.
Trent's cowardness while facing Joanna may be because he can't face her or otherwise it would demage the storyline. You can state it this way: He runs of in Air Force One, because he thinks the ship will crash - leaving Joanna to die - and plans to hop out with a parachute for himself -> this is supported by the fact, that he runs to the exit in the very back of AF1.
If you pursuit him, he will turn and face Jo, and he will kill her. He can't be killed, and he kills with one shot - just as in Duell - reason could be, that he can't leave AF1 as long as Jo is behind him to kill him. An other fact is: He kills the President. Sooner or later he aimes at the President and kills him with a single strike, causing the mission to fail - and making his threat "My last chance? That was yours!" become reality.
His cowerdness in Crashside can be explained by this: He runs past the Blondes, hoping that they'll kill Joanna, and if they don't succeed, he runs to the Skedar Shuttle in expectation the Auto-Guns there will finish her, or he could escape with the shuttle (besides the storyline would be demaged if he would face Jo - because the player would have to kill him, causing the cutscene to be demaged).
Well, I hope I didn't miss anything... Trent_Easton 16:46, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perfectly aware of the situation (?)
Talk:Constabulary

message: This article appears to contradict Law enforcement in France as well as other law enforcement related articles. The terms "Gendarmerie" and "Constabulary" seem to be used interchangeably and little regard is paid to the hugely important distinctions between these and "Police" and "Constable". The four terms have very different meanings and differing constitutional significance which are not dealt with ion the article, though I do not profess to be an expert on the subject and so cannot make an adequate corrections. I would strongly suggest clarifying these points and adding references to reliable external sources, I would be happy to render any assistance, though I have very little knowledge of the subject. HJ Mitchell (talk) 00:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues

message: According to the page on Fife Constabulary, it was absorbed into a new organization in 2013 and no longer exists. Shouldn't it be historical if that's the case? 2601:C:AB80:3D1:BE5F:F4FF:FE35:1B41 (talk) 06:18, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Current UK constabularies/Fife
Talk:County police

message: "Sweden as well as England, Wales, and Scotland, in the UK, now have a single, and only region wide police force Police Scotland."  One of the things that is trying say, I think, is that Scotland does not have county police forces.  But what have Sweden, England and Wales got to do with that? 31.52.255.220 (talk) 13:13, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  False or just nonsensical? 

message: It seems pointless to have the limited department listing. It would make more sense to remove that section entirely or limit it to a few examples. 
GreenBeret1439 (talk) 01:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Department Listing