Talk:Kinsey Institute

message: just thought you should check the punctuation, especially the comma that's supposed to be after "gender" in the title  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.95.186.133 (talk) 01:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, thank you. - 2/0 (cont.) 20:13, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: This article should be either "Kinsey Institute" or "The Kinsey Institute" per WP:TITLE, since that is the common name. The official name is actually "The Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction". —UncleDouggie (talk) 00:53, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree see #Requested move 24 September 2018 below. Andrewa (talk) 04:34, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong article title 

message: I've expanded the article and incorporated information from the last revisions into the expanded version. Since new sections were added, information from previous revisions is now spread out throughout the different sections and also has had citations added.
The media section was removed since “Secret History: Kinsey’s Paedophiles”, A Question of Resilience, and Kinsey since they seem to refer more to Alfred Kinsey and his work instead of the The Kinsey Institute as a whole.  Maybe they would be better suited to be placed in the article on Alfred Kinsey.   September 1, 2011
Wait, hold up!!! How are you going to mention the controversy in the opening and then nowhere in the article mention what that controversy is?  That isn't being respectful.  That is being biased.  We know that it has been the subject of controversy and mentioning the details is not an attack.  Why is that not in the conversation? Now you just have this sentence dangling there.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.111.30.239 (talk) 10:47, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Expansion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110815095336/http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/about/mission.html to http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/about/mission.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140409004717/http://kinseyinstitute.org/about/previous.html to http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/about/previous.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140429195952/http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/library/kiarchives.html to http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/library/kiarchives.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140416175443/http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/library/use.html to http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/library/use.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:14, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928231429/http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/about/chronology.html to http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/about/chronology.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130928231429/http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/about/chronology.html to http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/about/chronology.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:45, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Support, brevity, common name, etc. This could probably have been an uncontroversial move. Good find. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:56, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey