Talk:Preservation (library and archive)

message: Preservation: Library and Archival Science needs to be moved to something complying with our article naming policy, I don't know what tho. -- Jeandré, 2007-04-16t19:48z
:Thanks for the redirect Jeandré; the original name was chosen to provide scope and a clean url, but the suggestion you made seems just fine to me Jnadal 15:35, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name.

message: These lists need to be wikified and edited for style. 128.158.145.51 20:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I have begun cleaning up the citations by simply putting them in the correct format.  I love the information presented here, but I agree with the two comments above.  Some serious reformatting needs to happen to this article.Efkeathley 14:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations and style

message: I think these can be merged and the topics could all be treated pretty easily under the various media specific issues. One potential problem is that the media preservation article as it stands now conflates a number of digital distribution and organizination services (eg snapfish) with preservation services. That makes some sense in the colloquial use of "preservation," but wouldn't fall within the scope of preservation as an area of library science. Jnadal 15:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe some of the confusion can be cleared up by making a Category: Preservation Science page?  If the two articles are merged, I suggest Preservation Science as the new title.  This title fits well with the current intro paragraph.Efkeathley 17:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Great idea!! though I'd suggest that "preservation administration" and "conservation science" are probably the more accurate category titles in the library and archives context. I'll go read up on category pages and then should I put together a roadmap for moving the various topics? (I submitted grades last night, so now I have a few months where I can actually work on this myself!) Thanks again for all your advice! Jnadal 10:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree on the category name. The media preservation article needs work but I think a combined article might overlap. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 12:16, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging media preservation 

message: Is there a particular justification to having so many links to different vendors? — Anarchivist | (talk) 15:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vendor links 

message: Everything is up-to-date with working links. Sebastion fox (talk) 13:00, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Education Section 

message: The meaning of the numbered list under these two headings is unclear.  This should be changed, but I am not sure what the intention of the section is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Knjizhnjicharka (talk • contribs) 23:08, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: practices/care and handling

message: Should a new article be created about the care or lack of it when people borrow library books with some statistical data? It could also include not returning the book and intentional vandalism (for instance the Joe Orton incident). Slightnostalgia (talk) 15:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New article-Care of library books? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Preservation (library and archival science). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150508072810/http://www.aia.org/ to http://www.aia.org/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070427124537/http://www.buffalostate.edu/depts/artconservation/ to http://www.buffalostate.edu/depts/artconservation/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070510063100/http://www.nbss.org/home/index_flash.asp to http://www.nbss.org/home/index_flash.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070609194538/http://www.archives.gov/preservation/internal/index.html to http://www.archives.gov/preservation/internal/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Although most of the article seems cohesive, the inclusion of this paragraph into the Criticism section seems ill-fitting. Any suggestions as to where else it could go? Potentially a new heading or changing it to Critical Response?
Dfmoler (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Library as sacred institution 

message: "Contamination can occur at the time of manufacture, especially with electronic materials"
This is too vague. What type of contamination? What does contamination look like? This sentence isn't helpful without more clarification.
Dfmoler (talk) 16:44, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contamination under Storage Environment Sub-heading