lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Peer review

message: How about we edit our icon in the template so that it is not identical to the regular peer review magnifine glass. --ZeWrestler  Talk 13:52, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit icon

message: Its time to archive the entry for Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Computer and video games, but it doesn't follow the format set up for the normal CVG peer reviews.  How should i go about archiving it? --ZeWrestler  Talk 18:32, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Computer and video games]] 

message: I need a place for casual CVG editor attention. This peer review following the format of the big Wikipedia Peer Review is fine, but a noticeboard where we can direct attention of CVG editors to articles that are not yet near featured article quality would be helpful. We have the box on the main page, but the links are just links to the stub category and the big Wikipedia cleanup part. Something like the peer review noticeboard at WP:LDS would be helpful. Agree? I will make it soon if there are no objections. Cookiecaper 02:19, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I'll just make it now because I need it. Please see the noticeboard's talk page at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computer and video games/Noticeboard. Cookiecaper 02:23, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I need a different place 

message: If anyone cares, I'll put it here- I'm going to use a limit of 2 weeks on peer reviews, same as regular PR's.  That means, if it goes two weeks without activity, it's archived.  You can, of course, bring it back out again, but it'd probably be better to just make a new one.  --PresN 20:52, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: With an additional suggestion to make it "indefinite" prior to the first comment (the GA rule; it stays on the list until someone sees and comments on it). Nifboy 03:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, why not.  --PresN 16:36, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Limits on Peer Reviews

message: I've nominated a game, Legacy of Kain: Soul Reaver, for peer review but have no idea how to nominate it using the VG template, I used the normal peer review template. What do I do now? The Clawed One (talk) 23:44, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Help

message: In the previous peer review I requested for GT Advance Championship Racing (seen here), the only response I received was from David Fuchs who was also the GAN reviewer.
If I wish to ask for a second peer review to help me get the article a step closer towards being featured (my goal is something in the vein of Iridion 3D), I'd like to ask for another peer review from the WikiProject to help me achieve it, especially considering that the one comment only answered a question of mine about policy, not looking over the article (though, thanks to David for answering it!).
Is there a way for me to archive the previous discussion? Or should I continue on the same page? -- Nomader (Talk) 03:48, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second peer review?
Talk:Armagh (constituency)

message: * Following discussions amongst persons interested in Irish political history the consensus was that Irish constituencies of the same name, in various legislative bodies, should have a single 'Whatever (constituency)' article. See List of Irish constituencies. This does cut across the attempt to produce uniform (UK Parliament constituency) articles. 
* I have attempted to leave (UK Parliament constituency) articles in place for current and recent seats and provide links to a corresponding (constituency) article for earlier versions, see for example North Antrim (UK Parliament constituency) and Antrim North (constituency).
* I have left the existing Armagh (UK Parliament constituency) article substantially unchanged apart from a link to the Armagh (constituency) article.
--Gary J 15:07, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Čoček

message: I have reasons to believe that cocek is derived from köçek, rather than from "military bands". mikka (t) 29 June 2005 20:22 (UTC)
How is the word pronounced? Can anyone add instructions for pronunciation? JonathanNil 06:14, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Cho'-chek". (Sorry, I don't do IPA.) --ILike2BeAnonymous 05:13, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good enough for now, thanks! JonathanNil 06:14, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If it's actually Čoček, should it be moved there for accuracy, and make this a redirect?  Especially if there's no English form, as the article says. -Bbik 04:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move page?

message: So, in my attempts to clean this article up a little, I've noticed how some parts could be interpreted several ways.  For example:
:This music has traditionally been used for belly dancing. In the folk dance community, čoček is danced to many melodies.
Is this trying to say that there's one specific form of music, and that's used for belly dancing, but there are many different dances and they don't necessarily use the specific music?  Or is it saying there are many different sorts of music, and they are all used for belly dancing, especially in the folk dance community?  For that matter, if the folk dance community is specified, what is it being compared to?  Is there a non-folk dance community that dances it?  What is it?  And wouldn't that kind of contradict the fact that the dance is a folk dance?  Or is it not, and the article is wrong (though my googling seems to agree that it's a folk dance...)?
:Čoček is especially popular among the Moslem Rom and Albanian populations of Kosovo...
Is this supposed to be a list (Moslem [Muslim?], Roma, and Albanian), be specifying the specific religion of the two groups, or just specifying the religion of the Roma?
I also noticed that the page started with the word only being based on Serbian, later Serbian/Bosnian, later Serbo-Croatian/Bosnian, then just Serbo-Croatian.  Judging by the countries listed as the most common areas, it seems that the original Serbian would be more accurate.  Is it?
And while I'm at it, any idea of sources for the military band origin?  Or should that just be ignored and changed to the Turkish origin that seems to be a more common (and sourced!) opinion? -Bbik 05:34, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification
Talk:Bulgarian Name Days

message: This contains basically the same content as Name days in Bulgaria. Since name day articles about other countries have a title that is in the format of the latter, we should merge the two articles under that name. Vltava 68 02:34, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.--91.148.159.4 (talk) 13:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Finger knitting

message: I thought this as a method to learning to crochet rather than to knit.  Am I mistaken?
--Jaela 29 June 2005 20:30 (UTC)
Yeah it can be 
:It could well be. It's just something my older brother taught me when I was a kid. Surprised you even found the article. I've considered VFDing it myself. - Vague | Rant July 7, 2005 13:31 (UTC)
It's also good for visual luggage marking. I made a bunch of colorful finger-knitting bits and tied them to the handles of the suitcases. Very helpful when standing exhausted at the conveyor belt. :D -AndromedaRoach 06:56, 12 Aug 2005 (UTC)

message: The article seems like its a)teaching the reader how to knit and b)promoting finger knitting, as opposed to informing them about it from an neutral position. This probably needs to be changed, becaue right now it's not seeming very encyclopedic. 
Also, some images of finger-knitted items would be nice.DroEsperanto 03:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had already cleaned it up considerably, but someone added back a "how-to" section, so I removed it. A public domain picture would be fantastic, though! Ciotog 15:15, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't need a "how to" section, but it could definitely use a "what is it" section. As the article stands it does not explain what finger knitting is or what it produces. 174.6.73.206 (talk) 19:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an instruction guide
Talk:Zork Zero

message: If no one minds, I'd like to add a link to the Towers of Hanoi, as it's a fairly important part of the game.
Also, I'd like to redirect Peggleboz to Peg solitaire, since that's what it is.
--
"difficulty was nowhere near standard"  - does that mean it was higher, or lower?
Higher, I'd suspect. It was ridiculously easy to prevent a win by accidentally destroying either one of the 24 artifacts, or something necessary for the game's completion (like the yacht or toboggan). --134.226.1.229 00:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From reading The Twelve Flatheads, it seems they are part of the plot of this game. There is not enough real-world information in that article to support it—it should be merged into this article. Pagrashtak 20:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twelve Flatheads merge 
Talk:Elementary embedding

message: I don't think 'elementary substructure' is the primitive concept here, most of the definitions of e. embedding I've read are in terms of preserving arbitrary formulas, and then elem. substructure is defined in terms of the inclusion
map being an elementary embedding. Hodges "A Shorter Model Theory" for example.
Zero sharp 00:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs work
Talk:Admiralty court

message: As far as I can see all of the content of this article, as it refers to the UK, is wrong. There aren't a collection of admiralty courts or maritime courts, only the High Court which has admiralty jurisdiction and has for ages. A trawl through Halsbury's Laws of England suggests that the law is not "based on" civil law either.
I am happy to rewrite the article from scratch, but would that not upset people?
I agree that it is wrong, and I would also add that the article is unbalanced by having the historical discussion of American political history without the proper context. But there were a number of admiralty courts, all along the coast, and even now the Cinque Ports court survives.
:Agreed also. I'm not terribly au fait with the subject - but sufficiently to see that the introduction gives the false impression that there are still many specific courts (ie courtrooms) dealing with maritime cases. The Cinque Ports Court of Admiralty is worth mentioning, but a quick skim of Google suggests its existence is purely ritual nowadays . Tearlach 02:45, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No merge. The VA courts were separate courts set up under their own legislation viz (lastly?) 26° & 27° Victoriae, cap. XXXIV "An Act to facilitate the Appointment of Vice Admirals and of Officers in Vice Admiralty Courts in Her Majesty's Possessions abroad, and to confirm the past Proceedings, to extend the Jurisdiction, and to amend the Practice of those Courts." Albatross2147 (talk) 12:17, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

message: The footnote says "9th circuit", while my link says "10th circuit". Apokrif (talk) 18:32, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mackovich case 
Talk:Agrippa the Skeptic

message: If anybody can clean up the translation of the part from Sextus Empiricus (or if there is a public domain translation available), I would appreciate some help.  Thanks. KSchutte 29 June 2005 20:43 (UTC)
The quote from Empiricus is terrible and I will replace it with a paraphrase if I ever get around to it. I haven't checked the sources, but some related articles link to a different Agrippa, such as Heinrich Cornelius Agrippa where I think they should have linked here. Also, very few articles link to this page; probably related to the previous issue. Rootwhisk 08:35, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fernando

message: He was a actor,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.26.215.180 (talk) 05:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  CH Fernando 

message: Clicking on the letters in the Surname section jumps to the letters in the Given name section. Can someone fix this? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:37, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be done rather tediously with something like  and adding anchors to the surname letter headings e.g. ===A=== per MOS:SECTIONCOMMENT.  However, having multiple TOCs is unusual to say the least, and it may be better to consolidate or simply remove them. Certes (talk) 13:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faulty indexing
Talk:Carrara

message: I know that Gigi Buffon is from there, are there any other people from the city?  ABart26 23:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Carraresi? 

message: it says in the caption to the aerial photo that the town of Carrara is at the top of the image near the quarries, but isn't the main section of the city by the sea? with the part at the top being an outlying district.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPLeonard (talk • contribs) 05:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the town proper - that is, the historic town center, with the cathedral etc. is indeed way inland, closer to the quarries. The "urban sprawl" you see by the seaside is Marina di Carrara - that is, the port, industrial area, apartment blocks, hypermarkets etc. I spent a bit of time on the ground there, and remember the general lay of the land. I am sure it can be verified with Google Maps as well. -- Vmenkov (talk) 15:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo caption 
Talk:Henry (VII) of Germany

message: Does the title of this article fit with WP naming style? -Acjelen 23:10, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: I've added an external link to an interesting article about Henry's remains. He was seriously ill with leprosy by the time of his death. Silverwhistle 20:03, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External link

message: This genealogical table (http://www.bartleby.com/67/german03.html) shows him with two sons. What happened to them? His wife's article says she died childless, and Conradin is said to be the last legitimate Hohenstaufen. So, is the genealogical table wrong? SamEV 11:50, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  His children 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Middle Ages does not have a separate article on him; in the article on his father he is referred to as "Henry (VII)". His article in the German-language Lexikon des Mittelalters is under "Heinrich (VII)". Noel S McFerran (talk) 03:24, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Surplus

message: This page was tagged for clean-up in June 2009. Although no reason was given, I assume it was because of the minor tidying that has now been done, and that some of the entries seem to contain the word surplus, but may not meet the guidelines for inclusion. What do other users think still needs to be done? Boleyn3 (talk) 12:48, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is one of those difficult cases, because the disambiguated term is so basic that it appears in aspect in many topics, but inclusion of titles for which the disambiguated term forms only a part are contraindicated by the MOS:DAB.  I included economic surplus because the article addresses "surplus" in various forms in economics, not specifically as "economic surplus"; but that may be a debatable inclusion.  ENeville (talk) 04:35, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up
Talk:Pegasus-class hydrofoil

message: Anyone know who(m) they were sold to? What ships were the hulls reused for? I thought I saw a show (on the history channel) where one of the ships was now in use by the coastguard. Anyone confirm? --Mitrebox 03:56, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As much sense as it would've made to send such fast ships to the Coast Guard for patrol duties, it didn't happen. 75.76.213.106 (talk) 07:17, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sale? 

message: I was a seaman in the support group (IMLSG) for the PHMs when the Pegasus was being built.  My comments:
* I recall being told that the speed was "in excess of 50 knots".  I also recall being told that it was much in excess of 50 knots.  I also saw the radar gun readout but don't want to go to jail by repeating that.
* Despite the mission statement in the article I was told that the mission was to hide behind a rock in the Baltic Sea and to blast the Russian fleet as it sailed out which makes more sense for this rather expensive and sophisticated weapon than "narcotics interdiction". Comparing the program cancellation date with the date of the collapse of the USSR adds further insight.
* The gun was referred to as a Oto Melara.  The bow of the PHM was basically a magazine.  You loaded it up, shut the door, and pushed the button making this in effect a radar guided machine gun firing a bullet as long as your leg at a better than 1 per second rate; impressive.
* Rumor had it that the Harpoon had the same warhead "bolt up" as the Tomahawk rendering this non-muclear vessel into a more effective fleet destroying weapon rather rapidly.
* The Peagasus at least was a NATO vessel.  That meant that every NATO nation got something, usually incompatible, on board.  It further meant that this weight critical vessel carried tons of interconnect gear.  Scuttlebutt had it that this would end up killing the program.
Again this was the view from the bilge; authoritative it ain't.
:navysite.de tells us thus: "The project called for a cost-effective hydrofoil boat designed to operate in coastal waters and equipped to fulfill the missions of destroyers and frigates in those areas so that these larger ships could be deployed to areas where they are needed more. These missions included surface surveillance as well as immediate responses (SSM missiles for example) to any hostile actions conducted by enemy navies." -- That's a far cry from "narcotics interdiction". But you are correct; with the collapse of the Soviet Union, the need for large navies evaporated. -- 145.228.61.5 (talk) 11:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A voice from the field 

message: # Speed  I recall the speed limit factor was NOT horsepower- but the lift off the foils, go fast enough; not enough controls of hyrdo-foils; ship would fly out of the water (and then have a nasty crash when it re-enters the water)
# Status I thought I read somewhere all vessels were sold de-militarized, gun, missiles, gas turbines removed. Who ever owns them could still be operating them.
--74.214.43.144 (talk) 19:52, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Inputs
Talk:Alternative medicine/Archive 12

message: Alternative medicine is making good progress. -- John Gohde 00:36, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Medicine is making good progress 

message: The criticism section is very weak, and needs to be developed more.  The references are really poor and of low quality. -- John Gohde 00:39, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I detect a problem 

message: First of all, this quote should reference the specific paper/study from where it came, preferably with a link, so that the reader can have full context for the remarks.  Secondly, the quote invites the possibility of others posting lengthy rebuttal quotes.  Thirdly, lengthy quotes such as these are out of place in an encyclopedia article.  Finally, attempts to educate readers about the placebo effect should be made at... placebo effect.  These lengthy quotes need to go.  If it would help to resolve the dispute, I would accept something along these lines:  "Advocates of alternative medicine believe that the placebo effect is substantially beneficial to those receiving alternative therapies."  That statement is true and fits concisely into the section of why there is support for alternative medicine.  John?  --Edwardian 11:12, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Current quote from Benedetti

message: Can someone confirm the following assertion?
:"[A] PubMed search revealed over 370,000 research papers classified as alternative medicine published in Medline-recognized journals since 1966 in the National Library of Medicine database..."
I couldn't find where PubMed actually classified studies, but a search of "alternative medicine" found 2369 items.  Thanks! Edwardian 07:34, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Efficacy
File talk:ICC-cricket-member-nations.png

message: The West Indies are virtually impossible to see, even when made full-screen, and a change in the colour palette may address this. I would suggest a bold red for the full members. --Dweller (talk) 10:27, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recolour please? 

message: Japan is an associate member according to the team's article. Bnynms (talk) 22:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japan 

message: What is the green patch in southern Spain? Is it meant to represent Gibraltar? Maproom (talk) 08:06, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is that Gibraltar?
Talk:Messerschmitt KR200

message: I disagree with this edit.  []
What I had been reading was Physics Today':  Physics Today, July 2004, page 53, Physics Today, July 2004, page 47'.
--David R. Ingham 02:32, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  as to if 

message: It says there's a reproduction kit available. Details? -Litefantastic 18:22, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The UK company Tri-tech Autocraft  (website currently down, but I found they can still be contacted by phone on +44 17723 14299) sell replica kits for GBP 2650 or assembled ones for GBP 8800 upwards. They also have Isetta kits available. -Cohen the Bavarian 09:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kits

message: The article suggests that original Perspex / Lucite / acrylic is somehow different from PMMA used in reproductions. Why is that? AFAIK, these are the same polymer. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canopy material 

message: Who is this person "I"??? 213.112.81.229 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 17:12, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "I only ever managed third gear reverse and it was terrifying." 

message: Is it worth mentioning "In popular culture" that one of these was in the movie Brazil? Justfred (talk) 21:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: According to WP:TRIVIA and WP:WPACT, no, it isn't.  It has been included and deleted several times. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 23:55, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

text: Yes. For once, it had a fairly significant role, rather than just being a prop in the background. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:04, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: "It is not sufficient to note that the vehicle had a major influence on its owner or some movie or TV show—such facts belong in the article about the owner, movie or TV show." - WP:WPACT Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Brazil

message: I saw what appeared to be a KR200 service car owned by a member of the Kootingal Motor Club (Kootingal, NSW, Australia) last weekend. If there are only 12 made, and only one in existence that would be highly spectacular. I suppose it is possible it is a service car replica, but I do not have the expertise to determine this.
Redcane (talk) 11:47, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Only Service Car In Existence

message: Re Instruments and controls of a KR201 Roadster, where's the altimeter? Sca (talk) 15:48, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Instruments