lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Jimmuldrow

message: Hi Jim.  Thanks for your recent additions to this page.  It would be easier to respond to your comments, though, if you could include diffs which illustrate the behavior to which you refer.  Best wishes,   Hydriotaphia 00:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

message: On this RfC page, Jimmuldrow writes:
My response on the Garrett talk page reads:
Let me respond to each point you make in your comment.
*I added statistics from "An Empirical Analysis of Strict Scrutiny in the Federal Courts" by Adam Winkler, UCLA School of Law with a reference to add some facts to the comparison made by Hydriotaphia.
I'm not sure exactly what "with a reference to add some facts to the comparison" means, but I think that you're saying that Winkler's article was relevant to a comparison between strict scrutiny and rational basis.  Yet, as my response on the Garrett talk page shows, the Winkler article was irrelevant to such a comparison.  Winkler was writing solely about strict scrutiny, and (as my comment said) "makes no comparison between the likelihood that rational basis scrutiny will result in an invalidation of a law and the likelihood that strict scrutiny will result in an invalidation."
*Hydriotaphia ... said I was making a "comparison" between rational basis review and strict scrutiny when the comparison was clearly made by Hydriotaphia.
First, I never said you were making the comparison.  Rather, I said that your citation to the Winkler article was in support of a comparison between strict scrutiny and rational basis.  Second, why does it matter who was making the comparison?  What matters is whether the Winkler article was relevant to such a comparison.  Yet, as we've seen, it was irrelevant to that comparison.
*Maybe Hydriotaphia thought facts were too "inflammatory" again?
This is a needlessly snarky comment, Jim, and I regret that you felt it was appropriate.   Hydriotaphia 21:32, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Garrett''

message: The point of this RfC, Jim, was to try to get outside help, because at the time this RfC was filed you seemed to be profoundly uninterested in engaging in productive discussion.  All of the additions which you have made to the "Response" section of this RfC have to do with the substance of the articles.  (In contrast, the objections which I've raised during the course of this RfC have had to do with the process of editing these articles.)  Why not simply bring this discussion to the talk pages of the articles in question, and continue the discussion there?  I'm glad that you seem more interested in engaging in dialogue.  Respectfully,  Hydriotaphia 03:42, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The point of this RfC
Talk:Soave (wine)

message: One of the listed producers, Roberto Anselmi, actually rejected the Soave classification for his wines in 2000. Here's the quote from Anselmi's web site:
"After tough battles with the managers who administer the Soave D. O. C. consortium, in 2000 I felt forced to withdraw from the D. O. C. consortium because of an irretrievable breakdown over techniques and philosophy about the management of vine growing and over the plans for actual and future quality of the wines produced that way.
"In fact it is not possible to plan for quality vine growing by using the pergola training system, a system which is the main cause of the mediocre quality of the grapes produced.
"As the Soave D. O. C. G. quality allowed this particular training system, I felt it necessary to protest strongly in the only way open to me: to produce even better grapes and wines but outside the Soave D. O. C. consortium."
Angiolino Maule is another member of the resistance. 
And who says Soave is "popular" -- not a neutral statement and not supported.
*Good point about non-neutral statement, I'll fix that. There's a lot of this in the wine articles... it kind of goes with the territory. I'm looking to update this article soon and although it's a little anecdotal, if it you could supply a reference (link or whatever to the source of the info) it might be useful for the page at some point. If you're interested, you could get involved - have a look at the wine project page and sign up, we could use some help with the Italians! mikaul 13:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerns
Talk:Murder of Tara Lynn Grant

message: So, er, how is Tara Grant notable? --moof 00:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: She is the victim in a highly publicised murder case. Karrmann 00:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?

message: Shouldn't the name be Tara Lynn Grant?  That's the way that I've heard it say on most broadcasts. In anycase, I made a redirect to this article. —MJCdetroit 04:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: There seems to be very little information about Stephen Grant that makes him notable outside of the murder. Perhaps this should be merged into the article about the actual murder. AniMate 03:35, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has now been posted for years, which is likely why a search on Tara Lynn Grant's name shows more hits than one for her husband and murderer. But the article is almost all about Stephen Grant, so it seems unbalanced, to say the least. It's all about after he murders his wife.Parkwells (talk) 21:34, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The cites are confusing because multiple formats are used. Settle on one.Parkwells (talk) 21:27, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: One format for cites
Talk:Piano Sonata No. 8 (Scriabin)

message: I don't know how to, so would someone please add this link to the article?
http://imslp.ca/images/7/74/Son-08-1.pdf
thanks 200.247.143.77 00:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by Jmares3218 (talk) 03:41, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 19th Century Concert Life
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics/A-class rating

message: I have put an initial proposal online.  Please feel free to edit it, or discuss it here. CMummert · talk 00:33, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial proposal 

message: To get the process working I'd like to propose  as the first candidate. --Salix alba (talk) 10:34, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We should start a separate review page for it then.  I see no reason not to adopt the transclusion and separate review page setup of WikiProject Military History.   --C S (Talk) 22:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I have set up the system and written instructions.  I would like to ask for someone else to test them to see if they work.  Yes, all the templates should be in place. CMummert · talk 03:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Addition now nominated. I needed to make a change to  as the wrong name was being included when the subpage was transcluded into the main A-class review proposal page. --Salix alba (talk) 08:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition 

message: Carl has suggested/pointed out that this process can also be used to review articles which are currently A-Class, to ensure that they are up-to-standard. He and I have updated the text to accommodate this. I've also made a few other minor changes. Geometry guy 18:04, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review role
Talk:Louise Nicholas

message: Is there a technical term for the principle of law that is why there was a supression order? Because I'm trying to read up on that a little more, and was hoping there would be a link to it from here. Mathmo Talk 00:33, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following that I am about to quote is put in without any context other than the source and as is is kind of insulting to a living person and either needs to be deleted or to have a lot more context added in my opinion. 
I am talking about the following. 
"Additional accusations by Nicholas
During one of the rape trials, the court heard that Nicholas had said to a school teacher that she had been raped by "Maori on horseback".[8] 
I don't think the fact that she once supposedly according to a teacher made an odd comment when she was 16 years old should be included in this way. I think it needs to be rethought and either be removed or a lot more context added. House Tules (talk) 08:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: An odd addition to the article needs to be removed or elaborated on a lot more

message: There was some degree of discussion between me and a user from an IP regarding the opening sentence. We eventually came to the current version  as combination of both our suggestions that were made here. Am linking to it for ease of future reference for other editors. Mathmo Talk 07:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening sentence 

message: This article seems unfair. Nicholas has made various other allegations of rape, all of which have been unsubstantiated (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10372891). Most of thie article seems to be anti-police and talks about Ricards co-defendants being in jail for a rape completly unrelated to Nicholas. I understand that it may deserve a mention - but I think the procecutions case is over representated in this article. I might add a few bits and pieces into the article (with citations) but I wont make wholesale changes, I'll see what everyone else thinks first.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.98.159.23 (talk) 03:03, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias towards Nicholas 
Talk:Roads in Israel

message: Where did the notes go about the highways split by IDF decree?  Is this a bug?  Suldrew 00:39, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

message: In Roads in Israel#Numbering of the roads, it seems to indicate that blue signs are National Roads, which are one digit; red signs are Inter-City Roads, which are two digits, etc. (Road signs in Israel#Signs giving information also seems to indicate this.) However, some one-digits roads (e.g. Route 1 (Israel)) are displayed in both blue and red. So the color and number of digits must mean different things, in a way that is not explained in this article. --24.130.146.226 (talk) 01:39, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Road symbol color 
Talk:List of Boeing B-29 Superfortress operators

message: This should be renamed as a list--Looper5920 09:48, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: References were added, probably some copy editing and cleanup may be required but I don't see any reason for deletion / merging with original article. Regards, Piotr Mikołajski 11:00, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Piotr, Thank for your updated referencing.  If you or one of your associates could added some refs to the upper USSR and USA sections would be helpful and complete the cleanup.  I also updated the Stub to a Start class.  It is pleasure seeing your edits and updates to this and so many others articles. Thank you again, Lance.  LanceBarber 17:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lance, I've added some more info and references. If you have one of listed Osprey or Squadron/Signal books you can add a lot of info about WWII era USAAF B-29's Bomb Wings, Groups and Squadrons. I have no enought time to post all these info but with those two books WWII period should be complete. Regards, Piotr Mikołajski 21:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, got an old S/S book on the 29, let me dig it out, see what I can come up with. Thx. LanceBarber 01:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added WWII B-29 units from Osprey book and split USAAF/USAF section to two separate ones. It seems that USAF section needs cleanup and referencing the most. Piotr Mikołajski 07:54, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

text: In reviewing the S/S book and the refs in the article, they both the same.  The book has details on the wings, groups, and squadrons, that could be added here, OR with a lot of time create wings articles with copyedit info. Would take a lot of time... or even research the lineage of each one and update existing articles... a lot of work.   What really is needed is a list of all wings and squadrons that B-29s were in during the Korean War. May already exist in Wiki.... don't know. Maybe for starters, add more detail here, and see how it goes... LanceBarber 04:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 
Category talk:Wikipedia sources

message: For a discussion of one such category which led to deletion, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 August 5. – Fayenatic London 22:16, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating text from X 

message: I’m not even sure if this is the correct place to ask this question, but is Slate considered an acceptable news source? It seems to be quite a dubious source to me. I find nothing there but articles based upon supposition, rumors and innuendo, but I am not as familiar with it as others as others might be. MarydaleEd (talk) 19:58, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acceptable Wikipedia Source?
Talk:Praieira revolt

message: This article needs cleanup. Needs more context and details, badely in need of sourcing and a general reorginaziation of the info. It reads like an essay rather than an article. --Lendorien 00:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Anything you can do to tie it into your understanding of Brazilian history will be welcome. --Wetman 02:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alas, my understanding of Brazillian history is limited to knowing that Carmen Miranda was from there. I exaggerate, but you get my point. Someone else will have to have a go at it. --Lendorien 18:00, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I think I'll restore all the deleted material and the "confusing" tag. This article needs some adult attention. --Wetman 02:17, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

text: The first big question that will need to be resolved is: what does "Praieira" mean in this context? That's what might be stopping additional assistance for those unfamiliar with the topic. \sim Lenoxus " * " 00:43, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:NCAA Division I men's lacrosse records

message: where are the goaltending records?Toyokuni3 (talk) 07:09, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Goaltending records

message: Just a note. The reason the lacrosse records here don't always jive with what the NCAA reports, is because I'm not interested in what the NCAA reports. Their rules are so arcane that only a lawyer could appreciate them. Zach Greer's total records are included here, despite the NCAA classifying Bryant as a transition school that season. Bryant in 2009, played all Division I schools, they beat UPenn, they beat Lehigh, they played 5th ranked UVA. Also it makes no sense the NCAA not including USILA records, in cases where those records are well known. Division I schools regularly played Division II and III schools until fairly recently. So the idea that the NCAA can isolate just NCAA-era or just Division I records is a joke. Thanks. 10stone5 (talk) 23:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: re:NCAA lacrosse records

message: curprev 18:15, 24 November 2020‎ Mnnlaxer talk contribs‎  30,363 bytes -89‎  
→‎Assists: remove Swarthmore, not highest division undo
: * You are flat out wrong, Swarthmore was in the top lacrosse division then.
: Lacrosse_in_Pennsylvania#College_lacrosse_development_in_Pennsylvania
: reverting.
: 10stone5 (talk) 07:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Citing an uncited wikipedia article doesn't cut it. But I'll grant your point anyway. I will remove it based on no verification. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 19:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swarthmore 

message: curprev 18:11, 24 November 2020‎ Mnnlaxer talk contribs‎  30,452 bytes -360‎  remove external links undo
: * Reverted, how about adding to the content instead of shredding this page, a lot of valuable 
: information compiled here that you will not find compiled in one source anywhere else.
: 10stone5 (talk) 07:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  External links do not belong in the body of an article. Why don't you create an article for Ray Altman instead? - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 19:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links
Talk:Deterministic context-free language

message: I believe this is equivalent to the set of non-ambiguous context-free grammars?  If it is then this would be useful to include on this page.
:Not that simple.  All DCFLs have unambiguous CFGs, but is a proper subset.  Per Hopcroft, Motwani & ullman, Intro automata theory, languages and computation, 2nd edition.  Added to article.  (See example of unambig CFG that is not DCFG now in article). RJFJR 00:08, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: The example (palindrome language) as stated is lacking the clear problem description (what is being claimed) and does not show contradiction (necessary to negate the... khm... non-existing problem description). What it claims now is "An arbitrary string of this language cannot be parsed without reading all its letters first", which is not a contradiction, neither is it impossible to do, quite the contrary, in order to parse a language you would need to read "all its letters first". It doesn't logically follow from the fact that a PDA has to read all the letter that it has to alternate states. Maybe the language that is described by the given grammar is indeed non-deterministic, but no real argument is presented to support this claim. My guess is that the argument didn't preserve well after being taken from the source. 109.65.104.130 (talk) 19:38, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor Example 

message: Can someone clarify this ungrammatical clause in the second sentence of the article: "but any (non-empty) DCFLs also admit ambiguous grammars"? Two possibilities are (1) "but some (non-empty) DCFLs also admit ..." and (2) "but any (non-empty) DCFL also admits ...". Mdmi (talk) 12:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed 

message: This page would greatly benefit from a formal definition of its subject, and/or a more detailed technical explanation. Of course they are exactly the languages that can be parsed using a deterministic pushdown automaton, but what does that mean in practice, in terms of how such a grammar is specified? Nathaniel Virgo (talk) 09:58, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition/explanation
Talk:Varginha

message: "'The slum pope'- who is respected for his work with the poor, received a rapturous welcome in the Varginha shantytown on Thursday, part of a slum area of northern Rio so violent it's known as the Gaza Strip."
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2380138/Sunbathers-join-nuns-Rios-Copacabana-beach-million-Catholics-gather-evening-service-Pope.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.130.168.139 (talk) 03:45, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  dangerous?
Talk:Hejiang Province

message: I just saw the most recent edits to this article, which have established the medieval history of Hejiang. Isn't this a bit anachronistic? Hejiang province only existed for a couple of decades, you might as well just add the same information to Heilongjiang. I think it should be moved to the article on Parhae.--Niohe 01:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Medieval history of Hejiang?
Talk:Secessionism

message: I am removing the templates that have been added here and have merged this article with Secession (art) as per Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary and Bold. There was little here that wasn't already there and what existed otherwise was simply promoting one scholar's thesis (literally his university thesis) with a two sentence review. I noted that the German Sezessionismus didn't survive either. --Stomme (talk) 17:45, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged with Secession
Talk:Nagasaki Main Line

message: All the Tara-cho stations now link to Tara, Saga#Stations, as there just isn't enough info/history to justify seperate articles for each one.  In fact, I recommend we make this the standard for all the stations on the Nagasaki main line, and redirect extant station pages to similar sections in town articles.Claytonian 08:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  tara stations
Talk:Passos, Brazil

message: I redirected to Passos since there is no reason to have a Passos (Brazil) if we can have a Passos.  There was no reason to redirect Passos to Paços since the names are totally different.  Passos refers to the footsteps of Jesus and Paços refers to Palaces.  Vogensen (talk) 08:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Formiga, Minas Gerais

message: the article for the city of the same name in Sao Tome & Principe redirects here
how do I change that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Victorpougy (talk • contribs) 16:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: (non-admin closure) MOVED User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 03:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Formiga →  – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 22:52, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 July 2021 
Talk:Dún Aonghasa

message: Something doesn't add up here.  If the Modern Irish name is Dún Aonghasa, then Dún Aengus is a mishmash of Irish Gaelic and English, and this article should be moved from Dún Aengus to Dun Aengus, because English doesn't have diacritics.  If the Modern Irish name is Dún Aengus, then Dún Aonghasa needs to be labelled as Middle or Old Irish, as the case may be.  I've already set up redirects for all likely misspellings, including "Oengus", which is a far more common pre-"Angus" spelling of the name (in general, not necessarily of this site in particular) than "Aengus". — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 01:25, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Added initial assessment comments, at Talk:Dún Aengus/Comments. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 01:27, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial assessment

message: So, how does it look like? Is it rectangular? a built like a circle or?
All you get to see is some frontal pictures, which is very dissapointing.
I really think it would help improving this article if someone could upload an overview image of the fort, be it drawed or actual photo of the present fort.
--Byzantios (talk) 16:20, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  overview photo 

message: The current article title is Dún Aonghasa, which is the name of this place in Irish. The English is given as Dun Aengus. Seeing as this is the English language Wikipedia, why is the latter not the article title? --Michael Bateman (talk) 14:29, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Vernon White (politician)

message: I am appealing to you as a Senator and requesting you to protect the rights and freedoms of all Canadian citizens by voting NO to the Emergency Measures Act. Invoking the Emergency Measures Act will enable our Prime Minister to further violate the rights and freedoms of Canadian citizens and it is unwarranted.  Please use your authority to protect Canada and the future of Canadian citizens.
Respectfully, 
Karalotta smith 2607:FEA8:2DE1:9300:FDBB:E350:98B9:1ED5 (talk) 05:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emergency Act
Talk:Temporary Internet Files

message: How do we control from the server side so that the sensitive documents are not cached locally?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.61.20.228 (talk) 14:28, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

message: %USERPROFILE%\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files
What would the PATH be, if you filled in those "blanks" with SAMPLES of what should be there?
Thanks from us non-techs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.70.65.90 (talk) 21:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could we have that in English, please? 

message: Had this happen to me and I'd like to know. Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.54.151.44 (talk) 04:21, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anybody know what the malware and spyware was that caused the /temp/ folder anomaly? 

message: Does anyone know, how to prevent Word from using this folder? Has it something to do with user rights or GPO?
That would be very helpful in this article. --93.245.45.229 (talk) 10:14, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prevention