Talk:Chuluaqui-Quodoushka

message: This article does not seem to be properly sourced, nor is the tone neutral. -Will Beback 01:35, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Jerry, I do see great improvements made towards a more neutral tone.  However, Will is also right that even if the information in the article came from good sources, it doesn't seem to be -- what information came from which sources isn't listed.  I've sourced one of the quotes in the article as an example of how it can be done.  Anything done to show people where the facts they're reading are coming from will improve the article overall. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

text: To say that the article is balanced, and then use a term like "villain" to describe the subject is internally inconsistent. Large portions of this article are obviously written from a hostile perspective and include unsubstantiated and verifiably hostile claims and accusations. I am personally familiar with the subject and the people involved and I have *never* seen anything approaching what is described here. Bearheart 19:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed

message: Sourced from numerous published articles, and also from the Manual of the subject in question.
Tone has been adjusted to a degree sufficent to allow neutral perspectives from non-predisposed participants, but preponderence of information leads to a natural perception of non-neutral bias. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerry Cornelius (talk • contribs) 
:Jerry, I do see great improvements made towards a more neutral tone.  However, Will is also right that even if the information in the article came from good sources, it doesn't seem to be -- what information came from which sources isn't listed.  I've sourced one of the quotes in the article as an example of how it can be done.  Anything done to show people where the facts they're reading are coming from will improve the article overall. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To say that the article is balanced, and then use a term like "villain" to describe the subject is internally inconsistent. Large portions of this article are obviously written from a hostile perspective and include unsubstantiated and verifiably hostile claims and accusations. I am personally familiar with the subject and the people involved and I have *never* seen anything approaching what is described here. Bearheart 19:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article was researched properly

message: The opening sentence in the section on "How it works" says:
"Exactly like Tantra, Chuluaqui-Quodoushka is a form of hypnosis". 
As a traditional buddhist tantric practitioner I found this assertion inappropriate, indeed eye-popping. It does not suggest a NPOV for "Tantra" and certainly begs the question as to what is "hypnosis". From a buddhist perspective, everyday conventional awareness is a form of hypnosis. And Chuluaqui-Quodoushka does not seem anything like the tantra I know, let alone "exactly" like it. Perhaps "plastic tantra" or "new age tantra" is meant here? Geronimo20 01:11, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed assertion on tantra

message: What needs to happen is simply to cite the sources for some of the criticical *and* supportive claims in this article that are clearly POV.  I've added in a few citations, but I know the others are out there.  I think with a little work we can get the flags removed from this. --Kathryn NicDhàna 23:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Though, depending on the type of oil, that could lead to genital pain and vaginal irritation and even infection.  Just sayin' 66.82.9.106 22:14, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Cleanup and Bringing up to Wiki Standards 

message: *Like most sex workshops people taking the course have to agree to a non-disclosure clause.
*Quodoushka regards children and infants as sexual beings in the sence that they have sexual energy. No one teaching Quodoushka would ever agree that having sex with a child or infant is ok.
Almost every sex workshop in the world makes you agree to not talk about whats going on. Its simply to make sure everyone feels safe and that they are anonomous. Not everyone want all their friends and family to know what they are doing on the weekends. As said, common practise in almost every sex workshop in the world.
Trying to somehow link Quodoushka with phedophilia is just wrong.
Yes, they say children are sexual beeings, they also make a very very strong point in saying hurting children is Not ok in any way, shape or form.
And yes they think having sex with children or infants would hurt them, so its not something they say is ok.78.68.183.20 (talk) 00:23, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added some information that is relevant. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chuluaqui-Quodoushka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130305155048/http://www.sonomacountyfreepress.com/features/spirg-hagan.html to http://www.sonomacountyfreepress.com/features/spirg-hagan.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091018085510/http://www.icss.org/programs_quo.html to http://www.icss.org/programs_quo.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chuluaqui-Quodoushka. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090506150323/http://phoenixnewtimes.com./issues/2002-06-13/news/feature_full.html to http://phoenixnewtimes.com./issues/2002-06-13/news/feature_full.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060427003210/http://users.pandora.be/gohiyuhi/frauds/frd0011b.htm to http://users.pandora.be/gohiyuhi/frauds/frd0011b.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)