Talk:Science Ninja Team Gatchaman

message: Please see Wikipedia:Merging#B. -- Antaeus Feldspar 23:10, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the disputed merge proposal 

message: Whatever you decide, the title is wrong. It is an English language wikipedia, so the title shouild be in English. We translate the names of organizations, political parties, etc. Ninja no better. mikka (t) 00:28, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: "Their vehicles are docked in the team's main vehicle, the God Phoenix, a supersonic plane capable of underwater minor spaceflight as necessary." Heptapod 01:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engrish??? 

message: Oh man, am I just too picky to note that Ken and Joe aren't the same height, as someone wrote in the trivia?  I was thinking that Wendy Dinsmore was the one who did the original translation of heights from a book, but it's not on her site (that I found).  Miyae has some things on her site about that kind of thing, but so much of the Miyae mythology has crept into her Gatch stuff that I'm a little wary about citing from there.  Anybody know where that info might be?
Katsesama 03:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heights 

message: I realise that this article is essentially about Gatchaman but it does mention the differences between the original series are it's derivatives. Despite this there is no mention of the Robot 7 Zark 7, I think that something about him needs to be added in, by someone with a bit more knowledge than me ;)
(hope this works ok as this is my first outside the sandbox) - Ensign R 11:12, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a free-standing article about Battle of the Planets which is wiki-linked in the article. It describes 7-Zark-7 quite adequately. This article is about Gatchaman which did not have 7Z7 in it, because he was used to fill in the space left by the heavy-handed editing for the North American market. I believe that trying to cover all the differences between the different permutations would render this article unreadable. The beauty of wikipedia is that if someone wants to know more, it is but a click away. --CokeBear 07:59, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  7 Zark 7 omission 

message: I have fixed the tables in the adaptation section as best as I can make out they were supposed to be. There were markup errors in the tables causing them to render incorrectly (in fx anyway).
The first table in section is rather large. I believe that some of the data could be taken out and moved to their own section describing the vehicles, possibly poaching some of the text from other sections (ie the bit about the Pheonix)
IMHO these columns should be moved.
*Rank
*Bird Uniform
*Weapon
*Mecha
This change would have been a major one so I didn't want to do it without discussion first. After all I do still have my L plates on.. --Ensign R 13:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables in Adaptations section 

message: Hello there, I just finished completely overhauling what previously was a stub of a page for  G-Force: Guardians of Space and (if you guys didn't mind) utilized your variation tables on my article. Considering I'm still a wiki noob, would anyone be willing or help me whip up a table for Episode List comparisons between Gatchaman/Battle of the Planets/G-Force??? The list is already available: . This would make it much easier for people who are looking to pinpoint a specific episode or would like to see the differences in naming inbetween the three. The table can be utilized on all 3 Gatchaman/BotP/G-Force articles. How about it???
Also, might I add a suggestion to expand the "Other notable changes" table to include variations of all the attack names (i.e Tornado Fighter/Whirlwind Pyramid, Firebird mode/Firey Pheonix) between the various versions??? I'll search for a list of all of those. Thanks!!! Die 7-Zark-7 Die!!! 12:45, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for a "Episode title" variations table 

message: :Image:G-Force - group shot2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:G-Force - group shot2.jpg

message: :Image:Galactor.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:26, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Galactor.jpg

message: The "literal" translation is exactly the same as the article title in meaning, so there is no reason to provide a "literal" translation. That is why I removed it. Unless you can provide a compelling reason to have a "literal" translation which is the same as the article title, I will remove it again. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 06:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Literal" translation 

message: What is this?  Someone added it to the list of animated feature-length films, and I can't figure out if it's real of not... 
If it's real, could someone add some information to this article? Esn (talk) 04:59, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1978 feature film?

message: I have made some addition Gatchaman pages to distinguish them from one one another I feel a template needs to be made also. Dwanyewest (talk) 01:39, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, no. Your enthusiasm is great, however all of these inappropriate splits you are doing are only causing more work for everyone else who has to undo it all. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:13, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

text: How are they separate? Same characters, right? Same continuation of the story, right? (at least from what their pages say)? Where is the significant difference? -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

text: But does it also retain the originals? Introducing a few new while still having the same core characters is not a significant difference. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:43, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Actually, yes we can as that is not the criteria we use in determining if something has a separate article. Yuu have yet to answer my question. Are they significantly different. If not, they are all part of the same series (which is what we look at, not individual shows) and do not need articles of their own. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 17:16, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hoping I'm doing this right, and my apologies if not... Gatchaman II and F are not part of the same series as the original Gatchaman; they have different series names, were made several years later, and have a different creator (the original creator being dead). However, they are sequels to the original and use many of the same main characters. I'm not expressing an opinion either way on whether that means they should have their own Wiki pages, I'll leave that to the more experienced Wiki folks. It's kind of a Stargate / Stargate Atlantis situation - new bad guys, new technology, same good guys. Cathrl69 (talk) 10:07, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks :) Sounds like they should still be in the same article then. Having different creators is no different from Trinity Blood, whose creator died mid series. Being sequels with the same mains and different bad guys is the same as many series, like Sailor Moon, etc. So they should be in the same article for now. If at some time this article actually becomes long enough that a split out is needed, then (and only then), should splitting be discussed. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Gatchaman history is long and messy: too many series, too many characters, too many English language "adaptations". You'd need a Gatchaman "expert" to make sense of it in one, single article. I'd suggest letting Dwanyewest work at his own pace, since he's the only one (right now) working on the Gatchaman-related articles. And, Dwanyewest, you should take a look at the WP:ANIME#Recognized articles so you'll have an idea of what we (the members of WP:ANIME) expect from articles within our scope. I specially like the articles on The Big O, Giant Robo (OVA) and X (manga).--Nohansen (talk) 15:31, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions

message: Hello - just dropping in to mention the ADV Films release of Gatchaman in North America came optionally as a series of two-volume (gorgeous) boxsets, each with a special disc of bonuses.  These bonus volumes contain an incredible wealth of information on the release of Gatchaman in various countries, merchandise, comic books, music, and all kinds of stuff.  If anyone has these DVDs, I highly recommend watching them as a source of info for the Gatchaman article.  My plate is pretty full right now, but I'd love to revisit this article down the line and help work in it, too.  I personally feel that given the breadth of info available and the impact of the subject matter, this article has extremely high potential to reach FA status. :) --hamu♥hamu (TALK) 04:19, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional resources 

message: Let the two articles stay separate. They're different parts of the sagas. You wouldn't merge Empire Strike Back with Return of the Jedi. Please do not merge it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Monkeyjb1988 (talk • contribs) 20:17, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  do not merge 

message: Why has this article been placed under Anime OVA category when there is a Gatchaman OVA related article. See Gatchaman (OVA).--Dwanyewest (talk) 21:01, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The OVA infobox places articles in :Category:Anime OVAs. It is customary to remove these infoboxes when there are separate articles for individual releases (as is the case with the Gatchaman (OVA)) to avoid cluttering the animanga categories.--Nohansen (talk) 14:23, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gatchaman categories 

message: Low importance on Wikiproject Anime and Manga's scale?  Probably the only seminal anime more important are Tetsuwan Atom and maybe Gundam.  -- AvatarMN (talk) 07:55, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low importance 

message: Shouldn't it be mentioned that Robin's birdarang is also homage to Ken's razor boomerang? I know the point of the birdarang was to be what the batarang was to Batman, but you can't deny the resemblance. Sabishii_Kage (talk) 07:52, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teen Titan Reference 

message: American superhero genre with many of its conventions such as colorful costumes, powers, and "secret identities". 
Please do not put an original research. 221.184.36.224 (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not original research; it's established fact. All three of those conventions are very well known to be typical of the American superhero genre. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:31, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is ninja's tradition that conceals the identity.  

message: Is there more information about Jun anywhere? I'm interested in which of her parents was Japanese? --Gwern  (contribs) 21:05 7 August 2011 (GMT)
:If she is an orphan, if she doesn't even know her full name ... then how could she possibly know which of her parents was Japanese? In Correct (talk) 03:37, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parentage 

message: Expand the heroes, add the major others, and merge in Galactor. --Niemti (talk) 21:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Move all of this information into a separate "List of Gatchaman characters" article if you are going to do this. In Correct (talk) 03:34, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's make a list of characters 

message: Maybe the new DVD cover or something. --Niemti (talk) 09:20, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The box image should be replaced with anything that doesn't suck 

message: This is my first attempt at any Merger Proposal. I think G-Force: Guardians of Space main article should be merged into this Science Ninja Team Gatchaman article, especially if the G Force article is not notable and other people think it is not notable. In Correct (talk) 15:02, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: G-Force is still not notable enough to have its own article. In Correct (talk) 01:47, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: Since when did Gatchaman air on Cartoon Network?! I am going to remove that information now. I am aware that Cartoon Network aired G-Force, which has its own article. This article is supposed to be about Gatchaman, not American Adaptations. In Correct (talk) 01:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Get Rid Of Those Networks 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Science Ninja Team Gatchaman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.tatsunoko.co.jp/works/gatchaman/chara.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:22, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have read about other productions of Gatchaman, several that did not get produced at all while others have significantly changed from its initial design. They are only screen shots in blog posts in other languages such as Korean, so I doubt they will get their own article on Wikipedia. I don't think they will even be able to be mentioned in this article either. But so far all I typed was that there are many other productions that exist. In Correct (talk) 22:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Productions Of Gatchaman 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Science Ninja Team Gatchaman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081122090408/http://www.mania.com/gatchaman-collection_article_73598.html to http://www.mania.com/gatchaman-collection_article_73598.html
*Added  tag to http://twitchfilm.com/2012/10/live-action-gatchaman-akabattle-of-the-planets-g-force-hits-japanese-screens-summer-2013.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101016231521/http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/11822 to http://www.bloody-disgusting.com/news/11822
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Each is used at different times in the article. Which should it be? --Khajidha (talk) 11:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ninjatai, Ninja-tai, or Ninja Tai???