Talk:British Satellite Broadcasting

message: :Image:BSB TV Month.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:BSB TV Month.jpg

message: Hello.  I'm taking out two banners at the top: an update and POV, on the grounds that both of these arguments appear to have not resulted in any real Talk Page discussion (including history).  I have a read through it and am still not entirely sure how an article about a company that ran out of money nineteen years ago may need to be updated.  But if anyone else does, feel free... Contributions/90.204.65.38 (talk) 12:29, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Update and POV Banners 

message: An image used in this article, File:Squarial2.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:54, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Squarial2.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: This article mentions, without proof, that BSB essentially saved Sky:
The merger may have saved Sky financially as it had very few major advertisers at the time, so acquiring BSB's healthier advertising contracts and equipment helped to solve the company's problems
both SKY and BSB were haemorrhaging badly, BSB claimed to have around 750,000 subscriptions while sky had extended it reach into more than 1.5 million homes
On top of that being hard to believe (the saved company absorbing the savior company!?), it directly contradicts Lord Sugar's autobiography What you see is what you get states exactly the opposite: BSB had delivered hundreds of thousands of set-top-boxes to shops and stores but only had about 20,000 actual subscribers, and the only victory (yet pyrrhic) for BSB was the name of the resulting company being "BSkyB" instead of "Sky":
:In late October 1990,I took a call from Sam advising me of a big summit meeting being held with BSB and Sky. Rupert had flown in and was currently in a hotel room, locked in negotiations. I learned it was likely that an agreement would be reached whereby Sky Television would combine with BSB as a single entity. This sounded the sensible thing to do.
:About an hour later, I got a call from Rupert telling me they’d come across a stumbling block – the bloke in charge of BSB and his team were trying to salvage some dignity out of the deal. What they wanted was an assurance that the new company would not use the PAL system but D2MAC instead. This was BSB’s attempt to win some brownie points rather than face the humiliation of all the senior management being chucked out for making a real Horlicks of it.
:I told Rupert that this was absolutely unacceptable, not just because the units Amstrad were making for him were PAL, but because so were Thomson’s. Sky already had hundreds of thousands of PAL units in customers’ homes – how could they change over to D2MAC mid-stream? In view of the much smaller number of BSB squaerials installed, if anyone had to be disappointed, it would have to be the 20,000-odd BSB customers. I advised him, for his own sake, to go back in there and insist that there was no way he was going to agree to the D2MAC system. Once I’d pointed out the logic to him, he realised I was right.
:Later that evening, Rupert called me to say the deal was done, but that it wouldn’t be announced for about a week while some technicalities and contracts were being sorted out.
:(extracted from chapter 12, "Who on Earth is Rupert Murdoch?") Pgquiles (talk) 15:53, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  BSB saved Sky? The opposite may be true 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on British Satellite Broadcasting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120614095113/http://www.terramedia.co.uk/documents/BSB.htm to http://www.terramedia.co.uk/documents/BSB.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221232924/http://www.thevervoid.com/media/jupiter01.htm to http://www.thevervoid.com/media/jupiter01.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The term is just introduced here without any prior discussion as to what it is. Was it the original name for the program? Was it the name of the specific satellite that they were going to originally use?
I think it's worth including a few more words up top 82.35.49.81 (talk) 20:24, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unisat?