Talk:Avengers Disassembled

message: This is a terrible article.  Who cares that when you line up all of the TPB bindings they make an Avengers logo?  There's no discussion of the buildup to the story line.  You mean Wanda's been insane since WCA #53, published in 1989?  Made some major edits.  Feel free to make more, or revert if you don't like them. 70.226.163.23 (talk) 13:51, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrible page

message: On marvel.com, the only issues of A Disassembled are 
·	Avengers #500-503
·	Captain America and the Falcon #5-7
·	Captain America #29-32
·	Iron Man #86-89
·	Avengers #500 Director’s Cut
·	Thor #82-85
·	Official Handbook of Marvel Universe: Avengers 2004
·	Spectacular Spider-Man #17-20
·	Fantastic Four #517-519
Where do all the other issues come from?
:: I don't know, but if the rest of marvel.com is as haphazard and unprofessional as their digital comics archive, I'd be reluctant to use them as my only source! 
:: [I forgot to sign this comment. --Ben Culture (talk) 05:15, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Surplus Issues

message: No I'm not 'jealous' (saying that someone is jealous of adding something before you has to be the most moronic thing I've ever heard) nor do I have personal disdain for it. But its irrevelant. Yes, other sections have parodies, and yes I find those superfluous and fancruft as well. Adding pop culture references adds nothing to the understanding of the article and more often that not it clogs it. Some obscure parodies is not notable enough to be featured in an encyclopedia article.--CyberGhostface 15:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it might have been better for CyberGhostface to bring this up on the talk page first. When he deleted that selection, I didn't necessarily agree with him, but he has at least made a reasonable argument for its removal. You have made personal accusations. Drop the "long-term Wikipedian" and jealousy accusations; they are not becoming, and it comes across as edit count envy. Talk about the content, not the user, so we can actually discuss this. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 15:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Thanks. So far no one has made an effort to explain why the parodies should be included. All I've gotten was either personal accusations or claims that its not violating the rules, and therefore it should stay. Even if thats true, we should make Wikipedia the best it can be, not just the bare minimum of quality.--CyberGhostface 20:52, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

text: If you want to see someone obsessed, I would suggest you go to the Fair Use Inquisitors whose main goal on Wikipedia is and nothing but removing fair use images. Wanting to remove an irrevelant section on an article that adds nothing to the understanding of the storyline does not count as obsessed.--CyberGhostface 03:56, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

text: *We require sources for most everything.  Finding sources for whether bananas contain potassium or that H2O is the chemical formula for water is relatively easy, but if someone asks, we should do it.  The Neutral point of view policy is a founding principle and is the only non-negotiable policy on Wikipedia as far as I'm concerned.  That you find something to be a parody does not make it a parody, and if someone questions it the onus is on you to source it, not me.  It may be obvious to you, but it isn't to me.  If it is so obvious, you should be able to source somewhere where it has been commented upon.  To me, it could just as easily be a parody of the "Avengers Assembled" rallying cry.  Hiding Talk 09:19, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it help to provide a cover image for GLA:Misassembled #1, which is a parody of the first Avengers Disassembled cover, or would that be overkill in an article that only has one article? --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 13:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, just cite that as the source, noting that the cover is part of the parody in the text.  For example, The cover to GLA:Misassembled #1 parodies or pays homage to the Avengers Disassembled series, the cover (insert what the similarities are). It was also announced (insert where this was announced) that a character would die in each GLA issue, mirroring events in Avengers Disassembled. Or whatever. That's why I asked for a source.  Just keep the language neutral and remember, a parody could be a homage or a mirroring or something else.  Don't run with the obvious, try and present all interpretations.  We have to give the reader as much information as we can, succinctly as possible,  to allow them to make their own minds up, not force our interpretation on them.  If you can tell it's a parody by looking at it, it's a parody.  If you think it's a parody because of what you read into it, then it's original research.  Hiding Talk 13:42, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parodies 

message: Why must it be assumed that Drew showing up was a mistake? Drew the character would not turn down a chance to help out. 
Lots42 18:15, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: but the group was supposed to have been all avengers and Drew was supposedly inactive at the Time and an agent of SHIELD.--70.24.136.93 (talk) 04:49, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jessica Drew 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 15:27, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:48, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project