lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Railroader of the Year

message: Just spotted on the UP press wire... Union Pacific Announces Management Changes in Engineering Department: "May 16, 2008 – Union Pacific today announced that Bill Wimmer, a 51-year veteran of the railroad and last year's Railway Age "Railroader of the Year," has been promoted to the position of vice president-Operations. Succeeding him as vice president-Engineering will be David Connell."
When an article for him is started, this information should be included.  Slambo (Speak) 13:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Wimmer promoted 
Talk:Run and gun (video game)

message: I think they're should be stated what game is widely recieved as tyhe pinnacle of this genre.
i dont know if thats really possible with any genre, but i would like to know whether there are any free as in beer, free as in freedom and/or open source games in this genre.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.11.13.129 (talk) 20:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think they're should be stated what game is widely recieved as the pinnacle of this genre

message: The article title should relaly be "Run-and-gun" instead of "Run and gun", shouldn't it? SharkD (talk) 08:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Waiting... (film)

message: Probably not worth mentioning in the article, but my roommate currently works at the same Bennigan's restaurant that McKittrick used to, and she and I have met some of the people the characters are based on.  She reassures me that they no longer do anything to the food of "biotches".  But I can attest, from having been all through that store, that the movie set is an exact copy of that Bennigan's, right down to the layout of the manager's office.  Apparently they could not get the rights to use the Bennigan's name (not surprising at all), but the name appears to be all they changed.  Kasreyn 09:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a note 

message: Regarding this edit, two questions come to mind:
# Is this true, or can someone confirm it? Seems suspicious to me.
# Is it really of any encyclopedic value?
## And considering its dubious state as a "fact", should it be left in the article?
– Mipadi 16:32, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verizon Wireless store? 

message: The line about a "fake(?) promotional poster for Bussing" doesn't seem to meet the Wiki Guidelines and has little encyclopedic value. I'm going to remove it unless someone can confirm its truth and provide evidence for its informational worth. Jmodum90 (talk) 02:51, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done WNW3 (talk) 23:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional poster? 

message: Mrschimpf why did you delete the link to the community generated by the game idea in the film? Your reason " delete illegal (and stupid) "game"" seems rather puny. Since this is very film related ( in case you didn't see it )
I don't think it's absolutely necessary to include the 4th link.  The writing on the page is poorly done, and I'm not even going to touch the concept of the game itself.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Disturbed286 (talk • contribs) 01:52, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the section referring to the Game, as no corroborating cites exist to indicate that there is a noticeable community playing the Game - it looks like self-promotion. If the originator can come up with an objective news link or a link to anything other than death-squad.ro, the section should be restored with one link to death-squad plus the corroborating links. As it stands there aren't even enough user comments on the site to indicate anyone plays it at all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.58.2 (talk) 04:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game 

message: The restaurant featured in the film is clearly a parody on Bennigan's.  The decor is the same (not surprising since it was shot in a former Bennigan's), the food and uniforms are similar, even the name "ShenaniganZ" is a clear reference.  Seems like it deserves mention in the article.  Lurlock (talk) 14:21, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no mention of Bennigan's?
Talk:Dark attraction

message: I have heard of haunted houses, but never this term until I saw it here. I see a commercial firm called Dark Attraction Productions. In what country or what region of the US is this term used? The article should be merged with Haunted House. Edison 21:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is used in amny countries, including about every region of the US.  It is a term that covers commercial Haunted Houses, Haunted Rides (such as those little track and car rides at the travelling carnivals), and even those community jobs where they have you stick your hand in a bowl of peeled grapes ad tell you it's eyeballs.  It tends to be used a bit more by "those in the industry", but it is used fairly widely outside of it too.  And a discussion regarding merging/reorganizing some of these articles is already underway on the talk page for the Haunted House article - if you have something constructive to add, might I suggest you add it there.  --Reverend Loki 22:11, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Where did this term come from
Talk:Home of the Gentry

message: This article would benefit from the following added sections and sub sections:
    * 1 Characters
    * 2 Structure
          o 2.1 Date of publication
    * 3 Context
    * 4 More in ==Literary significance & criticism==
    * 5 Awards and nominations
    * 6 Film, TV or theatrical adaptations
    * 7 Citations
    * 8 References
Revised list :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 14:29, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:Ternary relation

message: Jon Awbrey 15:00, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes & Queries

message: The article previously consisted of a contrived example due to Jon Awbrey, so I have rewritten it.
I think ternary relation is the more common term. Are there any objections to renaming the article? --Hans Adler (talk) 23:04, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rewritten; proposed move to [[ternary relation]] over redirect
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket/Version 1.0 articles

message: Are lists allowed? (I see ALoan just added a whole load). I'm not sure if they're included or not. Stephen Turner (Talk) 15:02, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just asked at Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment.  FOr my money, the featured lists are all "A" class (obviously they are not featured articles).  -- ALoan (Talk) 15:06, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh. I also asked at User talk:Gflores (he made the initial approach) -- Ian ≡ talk 15:09, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists? 

message: I've made a list of long biographies, at User:CricketBot/longarticles. Many of these will be candidates to be on the list. Anyone want to sort through them? Stephen Turner (Talk) 19:51, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long biographies 

message: Did we stop doing this? -- ALoan (Talk) 19:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are most welcomed to revive/continue this page again anytime you want. Chongkian (talk) 08:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Hiatus?
Talk:Abdel Khalek Sarwat Pasha

message: This article is a stub. I have prepared a major edit for it, which will make it non stub. Due to the length of the edit, it will take a few days to complete so please be patient before rejecting it. The lead section will not have citations. Please do not jump to conclusions about lack of citations before the edit is complete. I will make sure that the first edit contains text beyond the lead section so that you can assess the quality of research and citations.
SuperAnalyser (talk) 10:29, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Edit of this article in work 

message: SuperAnalyser (talk) 13:07, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Stub-class 

message: Including references and pictures. Other edits may come.
SuperAnalyser (talk) 11:12, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Edit is complete
Talk:Isma'il Pasha of Egypt

message: According to the Official Presidential web site of Egypt Ismail started his rule on January 19, 1863 as Governor, not January 18. Also, is governor equivalent to viceroy? Ekem 16:09, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changes made in compliance with Rulers and heads of state of Egypt that uses the term Governor and  the Official Presidential web site of Egypt Ekem 14:48, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date issue

message: I believe that is a photo of Tewfik, not Ismail. Jpiccone 21:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph

message: Was he Ottoman? If so, it should say so in the lead. Badagnani (talk) 01:33, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ottoman?
Talk:Richard Hatfield

message: −In the 1990s, there emerged an major scandal in New Brunswick when it turned out boys being held in an juvenile home named the Kingsclear Youth Training Centre in the 1970s-80s were subjected to all sorts of physical and sexual abuse, especially by an sadistic pedophile guard named Karl Toft. Toft was convicted of 34 counts of sexual abuse, and according to most estimates was guilty of least 200 sexual assaults. There have been numerous allegations by the victims that Hatfield was not only aware of the abuse at Kingsclear, but was also personally involved in the abuse. Certainly, Hatfield and Toft knew one each another. I don’t know much there is to all this, but at very least I think it should be mentioned in the article.A.S. Brown 15:59, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it could be mentioned but it needs to be carefully sourced. -- No Guru 18:16, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good point. --A.S. Brown (talk) 22:07, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Karl Toft
Talk:The Man (2005 film)

message: I've watched this film a few times.... for a film that is supposed to take place in Detroit, they hardly mention it. They even zoom out on the Toronto, Ontario skyline, with the CN Tower, Skydome, TD Bank Tower, and so on all easily visible and easily recognized. I think Detroit is more of a scene, with Toronto as the main scene.  RaccoonFox • Talk • Stalk 18:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goofs 
Talk:Lyoko

message: I believe that the virtual bodies of the Lyoko Gang should be discussed here. --User:Angie Y.
(Belief second-ed, unless you-know-who stops us.) Maybe their forms will change in Season 3. --Gravity Control
It would depend on what you mean by their virtual bodies. Their powers and such are already listed in their specific articles. If you meant that wireframe model they seem to consist of, I suppose that would work. - Someguy0830 (Talk) 04:25, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Virtual bodies

message: where should I put the line about the diference in monster destruction when a sector is deleted? 24.193.53.223 21:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's noted with the monster that died. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 21:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah. But where should i mention that the monsters in the Ice Barrier and Desert sectors fell into the void? 24.193.53.223 21:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It only happens once. Trivial inconsistency at best. Just because it happens doesn't mean it's important. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 21:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey... 

message: Did anyone but me notice that each of the Replika Super computers are in a real world location that has a similar climate to the Sector's simulated atmosphere:
*The Forest Replika, located in the Amazon Rainforest (A Forest) 
*The Desert Replika, located in an abandoned army base in New Mexico (in the middle of a desert) 
*The Carthage Replika, located on an orbiting space station (out in the unexplored void just like carthage was) 
*The Ice Barrier Replika, located in Siberia (in cold icy plains)
71.166.1.99 (talk) 18:44, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you're not crazy.  I think they did that on purpose. – TechnoCat (talk) 06:27, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replika supercomputers 

message: In languages, what does "Lyoko" mean? A Word? A Place? A God?
Seriously, I searched outside of Wikipedia and so far came up with something about a potters kiln but still uncertain or know what a kiln has to relate to Lyoko. (Still the whole Lyoko/Kiln thing can still be inaccurate)
There are many reasons why it was first called Xanadu but why call it 'Lyoko'? what does the word in general mean?
81.154.239.179 (talk) 00:49, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Code: NAME 

message: Sector Five is referred to as "Carthage" throughout the Lyoko article.  However, the Lyoko warriors always refer to it as "Sector Five" , so I think that the article should be changed to reflect that (changing all instances of "Carthage" to "Sector Five" .
TechnoCat (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carthage vs. Sector Five 

message: Don't redirect this page unless you have already merged the content onto the new page. If you simply redirect it, it is considered vandalism.  ᾨЖƎɌȾɎ531  02:03, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection 

message: 23:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into Code Lyoko
Talk:Riffa Fort

message: The official name of the fort is Shiekh Salman bin Ahmed Al Fateh Fort, it's known as Riffa Fort only because of its location. Could some one please fix this or at least redirect! Thank You --eL_3eDeL 16:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: . Created redirect. Rehman(+) 13:03, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salman bin Ahmed Al Fateh Fort
Talk:Wind tower

message: ----
Badgir is not an Arabic word. The article is factually incorrect.--Zereshk 22:32, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The term "windcatcher" for the "other" type of wind tower is completely made-up. E.g. in the UAE, where this (here so-called "Iranian") type of wind tower is common, they are only called "wind tower", almost never "wind catcher". (Simply compare  with .) Although the architectural styles may be different, they function the same way, they bear the very same name in English, and probably even in Arabic (both articles say "Badg(h)ir"). I strongly favour merging them into one single article and within this article you may distinguish between the Bahrain style and the "Iranian" style (btw. I doubt that "Iranian" fits here - they can be found all around the Gulf). Hence I re-added the merge tag. -- H005 14:57, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Oscarsborg Fortress

message: Lützow hat only two main battery turrets, so "using her remaining Bruno and Cesar turrets to bombard the defenders" is incorrect.
--KjellG 18:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The guides at Oscarsborg are not able to point out 'Moses', how can Aron be known? I suggest that the text of the photo is changed to: 'One of the 28cm canons in the Main Battery at Kaholmen, Oscarsborg'. (Mind, there is also another 'main battery' in the Oscarsborg fortress, on the island Håøya.) KjellG (talk) 22:16, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is true. The exact identities of the 28 cm guns have been lost to history. A change in the image caption is indeed required. Please expand on what you mean by Oscarsborg having "another main battery". Manxruler (talk) 11:07, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The fortifications on N and S Kaholmen is often denoted as Oscarsborg Fortress. More correctly Oscarsborg include land batteries on the Drøbak side: Heer, Kringerud, Seiersten, Veisving, Kopås and Husvik batteries, Badeparken seachlight, positions at Hallangen and Bergholmen for the mines, Nesset batteries in the west, Stjernås range station +++, and even a battery in the Drammen fjord, AND fortifications on the island Håøya with the 'Top-battery', the 'main battery (Håøya)', and the 'Howitzer battery'. I hope I will be able to make a full map of Oscarsborg fortress. KjellG (talk) 12:59, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A map would be very nice, remember to quote the sources you use when creating it. I'll look into the battery set-up later today. If I find a good map online or elsewhere I'll drop a line here so you can find inspiration for your map. Manxruler (talk) 10:04, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Aron?
Talk:Iberian Gate and Chapel

message: I found a nice excerpt from Wells's Russia in the Shadows about the chapel here. Unfortunately, I have the book in my home library in Russian translation only. If anyone has access to the English original, please add the pertinent quote to the article. --Ghirla | talk 16:01, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Russia in the Shadows''

message: If there is a picture of the site without the gate.. that'd be a great addition. drumguy8800 - speak? 21:19, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of site sans gate

message: This building should be listed under a new category for replica buildings.
See: Talk:St Mark's Campanile Robert Schediwy (Vienna) 84.112.54.160 (talk) 14:38, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Replica Building
Talk:Staraya Ladoga

message: Why does "Ladoga" redirect here instead of to Lake Ladoga??--Kallerdis 20:11, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. --Ghirla | talk 16:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed. --Ghirla | talk 16:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Disagreed. See here. --Ghirla | talk 16:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect? 

message: I see that nobody posted the etymology of the word Ladoga
Ladoga derived from old pre christian Slavic term Ladyaga or Ladyoga; which meant "Lada"(goddess representing a swan; "ruler"(lada) or mLada (=Lads in english; "young people") & Yaga (like Baba Yaga. 
* That's BS.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:52, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: * There was a significant artist with this name! EvaSolinus (talk) 17:45, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ru:Иванов, Иван Андреевич (художник)|Иванов, Иван Андреевич]] 
Talk:Regime theory

message: I just wanted to say I totally restructured this entry on regime theory.  I'm a grad student and I'm reading Hasenclever's (1997) book for my IPE class and it's a really, really, really useful explanation of the three main approaches to regime theory, of which the liberal, interest-based approach is only one.  So the main problem I had with the way the article was written is that it explained regime theory as if it were only that particular approach.  So those things that were particularly liberalist (interest-based) I moved to fall under that subcategory and then I added other subcategories for non-liberalist approaches to regime theory such as realist power-based approaches and cognitivist approaches.
I do have a couple of questions to throw out there if anyone's interested.... why do we have a subheading for regime theory within IPE?  Is there regime theory that's not within IPE???  If so, I don't know what it would be but if you do, please write it.  Otherwise regime theory IS a theory within IPE.
The other is that hegemonic stability theory isn't just a counter argument to regime theory.  It's used by the realists WITHIN regime theory.  From Hasenclever (1997): 
"Given that hegemonic stability theory has been employed as a structural explanation of changes in international regimes (including their formation and demise) it would seem that it is best regarded as a specific theoretical account of regimes among others.  Nevertheless, regime theory could be portrayed and, indeed to a considerable extent, has been developed as a conscious alternative (emphasis in the original to the theory of hegemonic stability and its implications for international cooperation" (86).
Personally I think it's logically inconsistent, how can theory Y both be an alternative to theory X and part of it at the same time?  Also how can it explain what it doesn't even believe in (cooperation) (see page 90 of Hasenclever's book, which seems to argue realism generally and HST specifically see regimes as just reflections of power capabilities of the hegemon, which hardly seems like cooperation at all.  It'd be like me trying to explain why the sky is chartreus when I don't even believe the sky is chartreus, I think it's blue!
But maybe this is just because I don't understand these details yet myself.  Have plans to ask my prof. in class next week.
Regardless of these questions I still think the article is much better organized and thorough now, but if I'm wrong I'm sure someone will let me know.
thanks very much,
barb howe
gainesville
:I added a external links section and put in some case studies I found online. I was going to try and cite the page myself but the subject is a little over my head. I think the chicago case stufy would provide an interesting example, and there are some critiques of the models mentioned in this page. Good luck,EncycloCritique (talk) 20:03, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  restructuring and expansion of this article
Talk:Satchel Pooch

message: The use of separate articles for the three main characters (and one character's inanimate toy bear!) causes information about Get Fuzzy to be unnecessarily fragmented and inconvenient to access. Get Fuzzy does not have a particularly large cast of characters or involve a complicated 'universe,' and I see no reason the character descriptions couldn't be incorporated into the main article. This would allow users to get all the information we have about Get Fuzzy in one place.  FoxTrot -- a strip of comparable popularity, with a larger cast of characters -- incorporates all its information into one entry and is, in my opinion, a better article for it. Let's merge all these entries and give Get Fuzzy the definitive article it deserves. Perodicticus 16:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:Mark Dean (computer scientist)

message: Hey, I added a table list of patents that I found online. If there is a better way to organize this information, can someone let me know please.
--PhobozFear (talk) 23:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be interested to see if any folks have ideas on this, too. Rhizomesandranch (talk) 15:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patent table 

message: What are these "patents" on the IBM PC ? This  sums up the argument that there were no IBM PC-specific patents. --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:37, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This list  doesn't show any patents prior to 1981 when the PC was introduced. --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:53, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: PC Patents? Really?

message: Mi dispiace, ma, a mio parere, si sbaglia. Io propongo di discuterne. 
vasantEt  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.186.142.202 (talk) 12:57, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Your en.wikipedia.org - cool resource 

message: its hard to tell since all this is facts but to me at least it look almost the same structure to this article https://www.biography.com/inventors/mark-dean WikiJaxon (talk) 16:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  very similar to other atricle