Talk:Pendragon: Journal of an Adventure Through Time and Space

message: — JIP | Talk 06:03, 27 October 2005 (UTC)

message: -We should also change Ibara to Victory because D.J. told me himself and I quote "Yes, the Travelers won Ibara...but at a steep cost."
There you have it. Jason Garrick 03:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ibara

message: -I think we should change Denduron to Victory because Bobby states several times in later books that he won there. Jason Garrick 03:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Denduron

message: Yeah Bok nine isnt Pilgrims of Rayne. I plan to delete it if people agree. This is a copy of Booj 8's atricle
No, it was redirected, this is still the book 8 page. Mmm122 20:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Kill this page

message: I stand by this article needing merging of content so please do not remove the notice without further discussion.  Just to let you know, I voted to keep this article in it's recent WP:AFD so I don't have any problem with the articles but the content really does need some work so it presents a much more coherent idea.  For example, if this is a series of books, the coverage of the characters should be done in a single page rather than repeating the information in two separate articles.  The Reality Bug and The_Merchant_of_Death both cover the characters, but presumably the overview article doesn't have any information about the characters.  If you want ideas, please see The Dark Tower (series), which does an excellent job of covering the characters in the main article, while covering details about each of the books (release date) and major plot points in the each of the series books. --Reflex Reaction 03:28, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry. I just don't get the merge, as I'm starting to edit thid. Thank you. The content is good on Reality Bug, you say? I did that one, and Quillan Games, though Quillan can't be that great because it hasn't come out. Please cont. talking here. WP:AFD? Penman the Egyptian 22:28, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually what I said was that I don't have anything against these articles (I voted to keep it rather than delete it) but if you are looking for ideas, please check out the The Dark Tower (series) articles because they are excellent.  You can learn about formatting and what is appropriate or inappropriate to put into the article.  I will help you along with your edits if you would like --Reflex Reaction 22:49, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I just created an article for The Quillian Games.  Any help with it would be great Link9er 19:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Quillian Games 

message: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Courtney Chetwynde. Johnleemk | Talk 14:35, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Courtney Chetwynde]] merged here 

message: There's a long long LONG report at the beginning of the article. I think it will discourage people who want to learn about Pendragon. Does anyone have an objection if I delete it (maybe move some of it's content into The Merchant of Death) and replace it with something shorter?Jonathan W 14:42, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shorten the article 

message: Could I ask everyone not to add any minor characters to the Characters Subsection? For example, someone put Boon in the list of Characters instead of in Black Water. Thanks. Jonathan W 20:48, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor characters 

message: I was wondering whether we should create seperate pages for each of the sections on the Pendragon series page. I think the Pendragon series article is too long as it is now, but the sections in it are quite limited. I would be happy to write/expand the sections into article quality, as long as I had some help. If we did so, then the main article could focus on the series in general, and each article could go into more detail about the topic it covers. I was just wondering if anyone had any input.
--Primate#101 16:51, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding Articles 

message: In the box at the side, it says: "Released  "  I don't know how to fix it, but it should be fixed. 71.123.19.163 19:04, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 

message: If you ask me, Pendragon series and all articles related to it are in a horrible state.  They are either poorly formatted, copyvio, or don't have enough information to substantiate themselves at articles.  For one, too little is known about each and every Traveler, so they shouldn't have articles of their own.  There's more, but I can't remember it all.--the ninth bright shiner talk 02:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Über-Cleanup 

message: how long does it take for people to reconstruct a web page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NIKY12 (talk • contribs) 22:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  how long 

message: "When there is a new Acolyte, the old Acolyte does not die; for instance, Tom Dorney, the previous acolyte from Second Earth , remained alive when Mark and Courtney became the acolytes of Bobby, and so you know Tom Dorney was Press Tilton's Acolyte."
Is it just me, or does that last part not make sense? Should the sentence just end after the name Bobby? Because I don't see how the fact that acolytes don't die when their Traveler does tells us that Tom was Press's acolyte. Everything after "Bobby" should be deleted. Your thoughts? Mattbash 23:19, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense 

message: I found the following near the end of the Pendragon thread: 
Ibara: Siry Siry is the son of Remudi. He is the leader of a group of outcasts called the "Jakills". He originally doesn't believe anything Bobby says about travellers, but soon finds out when Bobby takes him through the flume. Siry is now unable to return to Ibara, because Bobby destroyed the flume, trapping himself and Saint Dane, in the process.
I am pretty sure that is not a part of any Pendragon book released thus far.  Please state where this information came from. 
Memory's Fire 22:35, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the heck? 

message: I have noticed that, several times,  70.72.173.51 has posted irrelevant and unnecessary content. If you compare his contributions to the ones before them, they are all basically spamming. This is to let any future editors know so that they can look out for his/her edits and correct them. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Laptopdude (talk • contribs) 23:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense Poster 

message: does anybody know what the Convergence could be?
Could it be that each territory has a second turning point? What about a third? What do you think will happen?--Chikinpotato11 19:55, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convergence Possibilities 

message: For instance various quigs are mentioned on the different worlds but I have no idea what a quig is. If they are that common a series overview such as this article should include a brief description of what they are and their purpose.--209.7.195.158 13:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still needs cleanup 

message: Ok, with the articles here not being very in depth, and always being changed and moved around, me and a few others made a Wiki for Pendragon. Vist it at www.hallawiki.wiki-site.com 142.68.64.26 (talk) 03:45, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been trying to fix things up a bit, so I might be able to help. ~ Bella Swan 17:03, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pendragon Wiki 

message: This article not only needs additional citations, it needs any citations. I'll be replacing the template. Teh Rote (talk) 23:29, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations Needed 

message: So in the second to last chapter of Raven Rise, Saint Dane announces to the Ravinians that Zadaa that the Rokador were planning an attack and that Ibara would soon be under siege.  Does this mean that the territories have fallen or should we just wait until the next book?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.121.149.105 (talk) 04:21, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Territory Victories?

message: I am trying to bring all the articles and sections up to date... some defiantly need revision. Thanks!    Ehccheehcche (talk) 01:12, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Up to date 

message: Saint Dane is only a link once
69.235.4.105 (talk) 23:29, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What's The Point?

message: Who was the brilliant fool who had it as Saint Dane's victory?
Read all the books before editing any Pendragon info >_>
Andokool12 (talk) 18:32, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was. Saint Dane won Denduron in Book Nine. So you read all the books before editing the info. *SIGN* 19:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed Denduron status 

message: Where is there any info on Alder? I don't see him in his own article or in minor characters.  He's pretty important!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.165.20.161 (talk) 03:07, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a half assed merge done back in Janurary that was supposed to have the information place in the minor characters article. Seeing as he is not in that article, I have restored his article. Nice catch. *SIGN* 10:16, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alder? 

message: Inside of the article has words linking to pages that are rather unimportant.
i.e. linking the word "time" to the "time" article or linking the name "Osa" but there are no Wikipedia articles that refer to Osa from the Pendragon novel.
173.183.84.155 (talk) 11:20, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: To be frank, I don't think that much, if any, of the information on the Pendragon User Forums is necessary.  We all know that you make friends on forums, and that people of different ages can have accounts.  An example of the spam that users received is not necessary either.  These are all standard forum settings.
Indeed, even the non-standard things, such as the history of the forums, aren't really necessary.  There is no need for one aspect of the fanbase to have the largest section on the page.  It seems like someone went on a late night passion-binge; at the very least the grammar needs a'fixin.
A casual commenter: Pfhortipfhy (talk) 05:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Deleting everything there. —Will(B) 16:23, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forums section 

message: I enjoy editing and/or answering many of your questions but, many of your questions have answers in the tenth book- The Soldiers of Halla, where all questions are answered and no questions are left alone. if any of you want to read the tenth book for free on your browser, a good website for reading the final book is ePud Bud . Search for The Soldiers of Halla and then you can start reading. Have fun!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.65.106.61 (talk) 13:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book 10-The Soldiers of Halla  

message: Substituted at 18:07, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Book 9 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 4#Book 9 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:50, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Book 9" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]