lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Frisbie Pie Company

message: Lovely article, it's a shame it's a product of unabashed plagiarism. The text, verbatim, is from From: Frisbee, A Practitioner's Manual and Definitive Treatise, copyright 1975,  Taco (talk) 00:06, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, according to: http://www.wfdf.org/index.php?action=print&sport_id=3&page=history/frisbee.htm you are 100% right that that history paragraph is plagiarized.  There is a markup for that, so I'll apply it. CSZero (talk) 22:04, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism

message: How can changing the spelling of a single word change its copyright status? I suspect this should probably be "trademark" infringement. 74.92.38.137 (talk) 17:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Trademark infringement?

message: Gmlew77t (talk)
This whole article needs a re-write.  The only reference is defunct and if you follow the reference manually it contains much different info.  Also, much of the article seems to relate to the Frisbee by Wham-O and not the Frisbie Pie Co.  (And yes, the name was Frisbie Pie Co. according to an era photograph http://www.ctpost.com/news/article/A-Frisbee-spin-on-legendary-Bridgeport-pie-tins-370680.php#photo-104274 Gmlew77t (talk) 23:48, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abundance of non-cited and incorrect info  

message: "People[who?] still disagree on whether the name of the
company was the "Frisbie Pie Company" or the "Frisbie Baking
Company".[citation
needed]"
There's plenty of evidence that the company name was the Frisbie Baking Company.     Actually, all these references call it the Frisbie Pie Company. I'll remove the section from the article.
Can someone remove this section?
:The original name of the company according to the United States Trademark is The Frisbie Pie Co.   P37307 (talk) 12:31, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagreement on the name 

message: I attempted to do a page cleanup, add infobox, etc. I have nothing to do with this company.  I went down the pie rabbit hole. First curious about Walmart's 50-cent pies, which I learned was made by Table Talk Pies, and that intrigue lead to The Frisbie Pie Co. I guess there are worse rabbit holes to go down but now I want pie. I hope I improved the page. Cheers! P37307 (talk) 12:37, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page cleanup
Talk:Sexual Sterilization Act

message: * What do you mean? The word "scandal" does not appear in the whole article. --Randykitty (talk) 16:23, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm specifically looking at the part of the opening paragraph that reads "[t]he Act, drafted to protect the gene pool". I'm not all that familiar with the field, but my understanding is that gene theory was not really a thing when this bill was drafted. What would be a better way of putting this?
p.s. Sorry if this isn't quite the right use of the talk page. Just noticed an issue I'm not equipped to address while in the middle of studying and couldn't think of a better way to flag it.
DIWesser (talk) 17:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this language anachronistic?
Talk:Wolong National Nature Reserve

message: Is this connected/related to the Panda Research Base in Chengdu?  hompage, found 
here  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.146.95.218 (talk) 03:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panda Research Base? 

message: Article could use more background information, on the reserve itself it is very brief.--Koko1088 (talk) 21:54, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nature Reserve  
Talk:Thomas-Morse XP-13 Viper

message: I deleted the "12 cylinder" from the radial engine information in aircraft specs.  I am not familiar with the engine cited, but most radial engines have an uneven number of cylinders in each row (this would have had 6 cylinders in each of the two rows).  If somebody has "for-sure" info concerning this engine, I would appreciate their updating the page.  Thanks
Raymondwinn (talk) 04:35, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dorr, Robert F. and Donald, David. Fighters of the United States Air Force London:Temple Press, 1990. . refers to the Chieftain as an two-row 12 cylinder air cooled raidal with the second bank of cylinders directly behind the first, as does World Encyclopedia of Aero Engines by Bill Gunston.  Both sources also agree that it didn't work.Nigel Ish (talk) 22:53, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Engine data

message: The images :Image:Thomas-Morse XP-13.jpg and :Image:Thomas-Morse XP-13A.JPG have been deleted per category for speedy deletion, criteria I4. The images may be freely uploaded again if a source and correct copyright tags are given, and a fair use rationale (if appropriate). KiloT 18:48, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image deletion as of 8th August
Talk:John Tesh/Archive 1

message: Yanni dedicates some time in his autobiographical book, "Yanni in Words", to John and their friendship.  John was one of Yanni's first touring keyboardists before being replaced by Bradley Joseph when John went on to begin his solo career, I think he did about 12 concerts with Yanni.  Can some of this history be added?  I have the book so if there are no objections, I could put in a short summary about it? Cricket02 15:40, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: John Tesh working with [[Yanni]]

message: I think that it is documented that John Tesh was proven by a worldwide vote to be unlisten-to-able. The clams and mollusks were the other 3%, by the way. Do you need a source before you include this? It was all over the news at the time but I guess if you want to delete it, you are the one who looks uninformed here.
:It is not appropriate to add jokes to Wikipedia articles. You're welcome to contribute here, but please make sure that your future contributions are unbiased and factually accurate. Rhobite 03:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 97% factor.
Talk:Meet the Deedles

message: FreedomFighter1122290 made some hilarious vandalism edits that someone should fix.Dabizi (talk) 00:26, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 21:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: User:Jeff_G. has added the Request for Deletion tag. I vote "No" as, in the past, and 24 hours ago, before the edits I had made and sources I had cited were removed, it was a brief, but acceptable-quality article. Once I feel confident that my edits will not be immediately reverted, I will help to get this article back to that state, and then would like to remove the tag. Dabizi (talk) 03:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources Dabizi cites are only brief descriptions of the film and are just as low quality as the ones i had submitted NitroMan3941 (talk) 04:10, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've removed the PROD notice - anyone can do this. I do not feel that inadaquete sourcing is a reason to delete. As a Disney film it is definitely notable. I have no experience with editing movie articles and have never seen this film but it shouldn't be deleted. If anyone thinks it should be deleted please feel free to post it at WP:AFD. As you seem to be unsure of the deletion process (it is confusing) the PROD (proposed deletion) is put on by anyone and if no-one removes it in the next week then the article will be deleted. At AfD there is a discussion about the deletion of an article until a consensus is reached. Once an article has been PRODd it can't be again so AfD is now the only possible route. I hope this is clear. Smartse (talk) 12:45, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken an interest in the article from the COI notice placed on the noticeboard. (Just a note, there's not even a hint of an actual COI in this article.) I'm going to try to get ahold of the movie soon so that I can see how accurate the plot summary is, and I'll try to dig up more references. This seems to be a somewhat infamous movie, I've personally heard of it before and not in good terms, and I'm sure there is plenty out there to expand the article. I've reverted to what seems a "safe" version of the article for now. -- Atamachat 18:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Deletion 

message: According to IMDB, this movie's production company was DiC Enterprises, which during the time of production (from 1995 to 2000) was a subsidiary of Capital Cities/ABC, which was a subsidiary of The Walt Disney Company.  I think calling this a Disney movie is a stretch, instead it should be called a DiC Enterprises movie.    — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 00:20, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's the thing, I've been attempting to acquire a copy of the movie with no luck so far, but I did run across a trailer for the film. The trailer starts off with a "Walt Disney Pictures Presents" caption. So the film was at least marketed as a Disney film. -- Atamachat 00:08, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production Company
Talk:Pelvicachromis pulcher

message: Common name is not in general use (ie: is confined to the aquarium hobby) and varies (krib, kribensis, rainbow krib -- on fishbase) etc. Moved to Pelvicachromis pulcher. MidgleyDJ 02:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved to Pelvicachromis pulcher 

message: Created re: disambiguation different types of "kribensis". MidgleyDJ 08:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: undid move and reinstated article

message: I passed this article, since I felt it met the criteria. Improvements could be made to the "taxonomy" section to discuss congeners, the genus' place in cichlid phylogenies etc.  I also prefer the citations st the end of sentences come before, rather than after, the period, but not everyone feels that way. Pete.Hurd 14:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA feedback

message: :This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Pelvicachromis pulcher/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.
===GA Sweeps: Pass===
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I went through the article and made various changes, please look them over. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good Article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 20:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Reassessment

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I went through the article and made various changes, please look them over. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good Article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 20:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps: Pass

message: Men 5.74.75.235 (talk) 18:49, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cich
Talk:Operation Pawan

message: The info box with this article states 12 Indian troops were killed in the Battle for Jaffna? Just 12? Really??!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.174.8.204 (talk) 12:19, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Suspiciously low fatality figure for Indians in the battle

message: Could someone familiar with this topic double-check what 130.209.6.40 added?  I've been reverting a string of vandalism, but what was added here doesn't fit the pattern, and I decided to leave the changes here with this note. -- Strangelv 18:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contributions of 130.209.6.40

message: In the 'Battle for Jaffna' section, para 2, does 'Air Traffic' mean the same as 'improvised Controllers'? (I've already replaced 'inducted' with 'introduced').
RASAM (talk) 15:49, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit
Talk:Louisa Hodge

message: I know I recognize her from someplace. I am quite surprised that all her time here in southern California has been for KCBS-2/KCAL-9 as a weather reporter. I know she has not been a weather reporter for KCBS-2/KCAL-9 until recently, unless she has recently switched form morning to evening. I am interested in knowing where else in southern California I recognize her from. There is something special about Louisa but I do not know what. I think she is capable of more than being a weather girl. Sam Tomato (talk) 05:13, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where else has she been? 
Talk:Cymbal-banging monkey toy

message: Actually, this toy has a more specific name... I heard it once but I forgot. I was trying to find the name and I end-up here. --Pinnecco 01:02, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

message: the article should be called Jolly Chimp, and Cymbal-banging monkey toy should redirect to it instead of the other way around. 
do u guys agree or disagree? --I said this! [insert witty meta-text on wikipedia signatures here] 17:59, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  move to Jolly Chimp
Portal talk:Astronomy/Did you know

message: Uhhh... What does a weather station have to do with astronomy? There does not seem to be a telescope or similar instrument installed in that observatory. Awolf002 01:04, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: D'oh. I saw observatory, and thought that it must be an astronomical one. Sorry. I've removed it now. Mike Peel 10:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Top item
Talk:Ninki Nanka

message: This page is useles. One BBC article as a source? Seeing as the Burrunjor page was deleted, and it had far more sources, this article should been deleted swiftly.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.73.78.45 (talk) 21:35, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. it has a reletaivly large amount of information for a lesser known cryptid. and it has an dinosaur like discription, a feaure commen to many cryptids in that area. I suggest that it be moved into a list of simaler, dinosaur like, lesser knwon cryptids of the african jungle. 71.75.237.194 (talk) 00:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:US Race Household Income.png

message: This image says data if from 2004, yet the summary reads: "2005 data from the US Census Bureau." Please clearly cite sources. I have been unable to find the data upon which this graph was based.
:The data was released in 2005 and pertains to the year 2004. Here is a link to the data . Regards, Signaturebrendel 02:50, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of extinct flora of Western Australia

message: Do you think it would be more useful to merge this into the Australia article? We could set up a separate section for each state where the additional extinct species are listed. --Peta 06:44, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection to that, so long as the information on the differences between the EPBC Act 1999 list and the WCA 1950 is retained. Hesperian 06:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I'll see what I can round up for the other states first. --Peta 06:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: States and territories
Talk:Beurre manié

message: Beurre manié is not a dough.  Doughs are baked, like bread or pie crust.  Those are doughs.  Beurre manié is simply a homogenous mixture of equal parts flour and butter.  You might call it a paste, but it is not a dough.
It is meant to thicken and finish cooked sauces so there is no issue of that uncooked flour taste -- when the sauce has thickened, the flour is no longer raw.
If you want an example of a good description of why it is used, how it is made and how it is used, see this brief article in Saveur:  http://www.saveur.com/article/Techniques/saveur-100-beurre-manie.  Zlama (talk) 23:57, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of issues... 

message: I currently can’t figure out how to correct the links to the Norwegian and Danish articles on “melbolle”. These are not the equivalent of a beurre manié, but are dumplings used in soups. Instead, the correct link for the Danish Wiki is to “smørbolle”, whereas the Norwegian one currently has no equivalent article (though such “cold thickening” techniques are mentioned in the article “jevning”, i.e. on thickening agents and techniques used for sauces). Mojowiha (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I managed to unlink the Norwegian article for "melbolle", but whenever I tried to change the linked article for Danish to "smørbolle" it failed to save. The Joke Breaker (talk) 15:32, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong wiki links to the Danish and Norwegian Wikipedias
Talk:Inuit grammar

message: Just a question... in the section about the tense modifiers, the suffix -laaq- is said to delete a previous consonant, but the example that's given "uqaqlaaqtara" still has the consonant that was to be deleted. Shouldn't it be "uqalaaqtara", without the second Q?
TarisWerewolf 01:26, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *  - ∅ (∅), 05:07, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment salvaged from article 

message: The article says 'take suffixes that indicate the grammatical person of both the subject and the object, but not their grammatical number.' but I don't think that's true...Mallon's Reference Grammar refers to (without enumerating) 'the various combinations of duals and plurals' in the relevant sections, and Spalding's learning Inuktitut shows separate forms for singular subject (-vara, -vat, -vaa) and plural subject (-vavut, -vasi, -vaat), and a similar distinction for singular and plural objects, and the Inuktitut Morphological Analyser (example: takuvaka) seems to bear this out. Does anyone know for sure, or better yet, have a full chart of all the possible forms? Moszczynski 05:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specific grammatical suffixes 

message: It will be useful if the author specifies the dialect of each example  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glammy (talk • contribs) 05:53, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dialects 

message: This article should be converted to normal ergative–absolutive terminology. The odd terms used in only this article, as a doomed attempt to recast the grammar as nominative–accusative, are opaque to everyone else. — kwami (talk) 15:26, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not universal approach 

message: Where are they?! This is a huge, gaping hole in this article! 72.21.131.202 (talk) 00:27, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nouns 
Talk:Allemande sauce

message: * Just cleaning up some basic grammatical and syntactical problems.  Will someone please elaborate on its being named "German sauce"? Is there a reason Germans were thought of as "pale yellow"?? --Otheus 17:38, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Now why is it actually called "Sauce allemande"? That should also be explained in the article.--93.129.21.66 (talk) 21:27, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Escoffier wrote in 1903, that Sauce Allemande is like most other sauce names (Hollandaise, Bearnaise, Bordelais, Espagnole...) just a branding. Paul Bocuse confirmed that in his standard cook book of 1976 (La cuisine de marche) when he discribes the "Sauce Allemande also called Sauce Parisienne". Only a few dish names are not pure fantasy (e.g. Cumberland, Melba, Duxelles and some more). The renaming into Sauce Parisienne for political reasons is correct so far and marked the begining of french chauvinism in kitchen. Until World War 2 nearly all german, italian and spanish influences of Escoffier's very international Haute Cuisine were eliminated, canceled, substituted or renamed by alsacian, pyrenean, swiss and provencial elements or names. In Nouvelle Cuisine the only not french ingredients are swiss and parmesan cheese.--46.115.55.133 (talk) 09:46, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the sauce
Talk:Post-painterly abstraction

message: Hello, I do not belive there is or was a gallery called the Art Gallery of Toronto, I belive the Art gallery of Ontario, which is located in Toronto is correct but I have never heard of the other. It might be something that needs checking.
:It was called Art Museum of Toronto until 1966 when the name changed to Art Gallery of Ontario. For the date referred to in the article (1964), the former is correct, so I've changed it to reflect that. freshacconci talktalk 12:52, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article says that Color Field painting supplanted Post-Painterly Abstraction. I'm not entirely how to approach this. For one thing, Color field seems mostly to be a type of post-painterly abstraction. On the other hand, I doubt it was supplanting PPA, since CF came first (more or less - frankenthaler did Mountains and Sea and then Greenberg decided staining was the way to go). Opinons? Ghamming 03:06, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, first there was Color field painting by artists like Barnett Newman, Mark Rothko, Clyfford Still, and Adolph Gottlieb who were called Color field artists by Clement Greenberg during the 1950s. The Post-Painterly Abstraction exhibition of 1964, curated by Clement Greenberg advanced the next generation of younger artists. Helen Frankenthaler, Morris Louis, Kenneth Noland etc. Actually James Brooks made stain paintings in the 1940s and Jackson Pollock's 1951 stain paintings as well as his 1952 stain paintings predate Mountains and Sea. Modernist 18:55, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color Field Painting
Talk:Displacer beast

message: Coming as a surprise to me, my AD&D Monster Manual (4th printing, 1979) lists these as being of Neutral alignment. I don't own later versions of the game so cannot comment on when this was changed. MikeEagling (talk) 02:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I had to see it for myself, so I looked it up and was as equally surprised to find the same thing as you did.  I wish I had some of the other books it has appeared in available to me, but at this moment I do not. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alignment 

message: There are multiple pieces of both official and fan art for this creature, and the provided AI-generated piece doesn't even match the description of the creature (six-legged, two tentacles growing from the shoulder plates in the back) 177.93.150.216 (talk) 02:16, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I would ask User:ExonOxon, who added it. 2601:240:E200:3B60:9592:2091:C98F:C348 (talk) 04:15, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the AI art?
Talk:Double Eclipse

message: Hi I have a question about the track listing for this album. I have a copy of the Japanese release (MVCM-18513) and on it "Love Leads The Way" is track number 3 not number 13 as listed on both this page and a fan website. All other songs after it move down one slot. Does anyone else have a copy that has the song at track 13? If not then I will change the listing to it's correct form. Thanks for the help. Solonyc 01:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you haven't done so already, be bold and do it! :) Bubba hotep 21:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Track Listing Question