Talk:Aircraft upset

message: This is becoming very confusing.  Milborneone said: "I dont think the related accidents section gives any value to the article and I would suggest they could be deleted."
Then, Polar Yukon said:  "Agreed, the 'related accidents' section can be deleted..."
EditorASC then responded: "If he wants to now delete his own work, and replace with a new section, as suggested, then I will not object."
PolarYukon then replied: "...we are proposing deleting the current section, and placing the list of flights into a Category:Aircraft accidents and incidents involving aircraft upset."
Now, Nimbus227 says: "The suggested red link is not an article but a category, it would appear like this; Category:Aircraft piston engines. Editors decide whether the category should be added (or removed) from an article." 
Seems to me all voted for that section to be deleted.  So, I deleted it.  But now, Polar Yukon has reverted that delete.  If no one was suggesting that the section be deleted, then why was the word section used, when saying it should be deleted?  
If it is now agreed (I will go along with any consensus of the others), that the "related accidents" section should remain in the article (NOT deleted), then I will proceed to eliminate the ones in that section that are not cases of loss of control and/or "upset."  I will also continue to add brief summaries on those that remain, in the same manner as I have already done.  But, would like to know for sure, if that section is to be retained or deleted, before I do anymore work on it.  
As to Nimbus227's comment that the category (for that "related accidents" section), should be "Aircraft piston engines," I am afraid I do not understand why.  None of the accidents listed in that section, were piston-engined aircraft.  They all had jet engines powering them.  Would appreciate some further explanation on that.  Thanks much, EditorASC (talk) 21:41, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify, my use of the aircraft piston engine was just to show how a category looks when it is populated, it has nothing to do with this article. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 21:51, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that clarification. EditorASC (talk) 23:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

text: The suggestion is that the section related accidents be deleted - it is still under discussion above, an additional suggestion was that accidents related to aircraft upset be added to a category (refer to Wikipedia:Categorization). As Nimbus said the piston engine remark was just to show you what a category looked like as you did not appear to understand. If you need more clarification then please ask, but please make any comments on the suggestions in the above section as not to further confuse. MilborneOne (talk) 21:57, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, additional comments are back in the previous section of this talk page. EditorASC (talk) 23:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Section or Category?

message: The introduction to the article describes the effect of aircraft upset, but doesn't define it. As it is, the reader doesn't learn what an aircraft upset is until a later section of the article. The term should be briefly, but properly defined in the first paragraph of the introduction. Cousin Ricky (talk) 23:23, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Aircraft upset. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090227160239/http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/airline_operators/training/media/Appendix%203-E_HighAltOperations.ppt to http://www.faa.gov/other_visit/aviation_industry/airline_operators/training/media/Appendix%203-E_HighAltOperations.ppt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Aircraft upset. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111030043659/http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/reports/2000/TM-2000-209810.pdf to http://gltrs.grc.nasa.gov/reports/2000/TM-2000-209810.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://aviation-safety.net/database/record.php?id%3D19631129-0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified