Talk:American march music

message: I finally got around to it. I will be working on the musicality aspect soon. However, this article is still in desperate need of images. Can someone who's good with placing images find some and add them to this article? Thanks. 
My additions also need to be wikified.
--SousaFan88 22:51, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: Wow.  Really POV.  Joyous 05:52, Jul 1, 2004 (UTC)
:Removed the "10 Great things about marches."  Content was 
10 Great Things about Marches
*Marches are easy to follow 
*Marches bring out the best of every instrument section
*Marches have a lot of feeling and motion
*Every march is unique 
*Marches are sophisticated, but never boring
*Marches are versatile. They can be played by any band.
*Marches are not so long that they lose the attention of the listener
*Almost every music composer has written marches 
*Marches are used in parades, circuses, and many more places.
*A march will stay in the very heart and soul of the listener
Joyous 22:58, Jul 22, 2004 (UTC)
*They follow Februaries. They are almost springtime. :) Wahkeenah 04:12, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  10 Great Things about Marches 

message: I had never heard of it before, but that entry about them being the first marching band has at least a kernel (colonel?) of truth.  The original version goes back to the 1200s. However, I think a tad more research would be needed before someone could claim they were the first marching band. Wahkeenah 04:11, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mehter band? 

message: I'm not quite familiar on how citation works in this case. The musicality of marches (or any style of music for that matter) is what is is. As long as the technical information is valid and gives examples, does it really need citation or references? I didn't read any achived document that explained the chord progression of a certain march and transferred it into this article. I used the knowledge of theory that I had and came up with all the information. I'm guessing I wouldn't have to cite from what/who I learned theory? I'm sure most of you can give advice. I'm just dumb when it comes to this. SousaFan88 08:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh, I think technically one would consider it original research, unfortunately.  But I think the article's useful whether original research has sneaked in or not. Srwight 04:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musicality section needs sources? 

message: :Image:Nobles chord.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Nobles chord.ogg

message: :Image:Washington Post small.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Washington Post small.jpg

message: :Image:Funky Winkerbean sousa.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Funky Winkerbean sousa.jpg

message: I believe that this page was originally written as the main article for marches but was eventually changed to be specific to American march music. When it was switched over it was not adequately edited to reflect the new title, that is, there is still a large amount of general knowledge about marches here that should probably belong on the March (music) article.  Any general information about marches on this page should be used only to demonstrate how American marches either conform or deviate from the general category.
This page also has a big lack of sources---I think most come from the same place---so I'll be doing some research, editing and moving info from here to the main march article. Any suggestions, let me know! Adam Blake (talk) 18:31, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content overlap with [[March (music)]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on American march music. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060228050516/http://www.music.vt.edu:80/musicdictionary/ to http://www.music.vt.edu/musicdictionary
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:47, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified