lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Arkyan 2

message: (Replying here to not clutter the main page with excessive threaded discussion.)  You've used the words "xem" and "bezzie", neither of which I know, so I may not be understanding you. The reason I say you had no valid reason for the oppose last time was that you opposed per spamming which was not spamming.  Notifying concerned editors about an AFD is not harmful in any way I can see.  On Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Cometstyles_2 I was opposing not because the two RFAs were too close together, but rather because of the poor behavior displayed so recently by the editor in question.  Friday (talk) 18:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reply to Matthew
Talk:Asynchronous system

message: Isn't this text copyright SIGDA? It even says:
:Adapted from Steve Nowick's column in the ACM SIGDA e-newsletter by Igor Markov. Original text is available at http://www.sigda.org/newsletter/2006/eNews_060115.html
129.215.37.3 18:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The text was added by User:Igor Markov who is one of the editors of the SIGDA newsletter. 78.105.220.50 (talk) 17:34, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright status
Talk:The Mother Hips

message: Could you please _m_o_v_e_ the old page here? This would save the history of the page. Fuhbär 18:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I added the "Unreferenced" and "Peacock" templates because this article does not cite sources, and uses many "puffery" terms :) BrickMcLargeHuge (talk) 11:10, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't you just delete the utterly stupid comments? 67.162.10.70 (talk) 03:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced, Peacock

message: Since it's increasingly clear no one is discussing this, I'm adding it to the genres.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.1.205.187 (talk) 05:07, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: About the genres, why aren't they listed as "Alternative" also? Itunes labels them as this and they sound alternative too.Demoman87 (talk) 04:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Folk rock

message: Hi, Hips fans.
We're a marketing team from their label, Blue Rose Music, working directly with Tim and Greg to clean up and brighten this Wikipedia page. Let's get the Hips out there! 64.201.107.119 (talk) 21:05, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamping the Page
Talk:Binary multiplier

message: The 4 bit by 4 bit multiplier figure looks flawed - namely, 
the ordering of the bits of Multiplicand B is reversed when
they enter 2nd and 3rd adders.
Fixed.   Quartparcial prouductst (talk) 20:47, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The fixed version is a 4 bit multiplier, it was reverted for the time being.  Once it is reverted I suggest we do an article rewrite because it doesn't really match the style of other pages, and its kind of hard to read.Deadcellplus (talk) 20:26, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc

message: Microprocessor Integer Multiply Instruction Bit Sizes
Microprocessor              	8 x 8 = 16	16 x 16 = 32	32 x 16 = 32	32 x 32 = 32	32 x 32 = 64	64 x 64 = 64	64 x 64 = 128
ARM (older cores)           	          	*           	*           	            	            	            	
ARM Cortex-M0/M0+/M1        	          	            	            	            	            	            	
ARM Cortex-M3/M4/M7         	          	*           	*           	            	            	            	
ARM Cortex-A & Cortex-R     	          	*           	*           	            	            	            	
ARM Cortex-A53/A57 (ARMv8-A)	          	            	            	            	            	            	*
Atmel AVR32                 	          	            	            	            	            	            	
Microchip PIC32             	          	            	            	            	            	            	
Motorola 6809               	          	            	            	            	            	            	
* Note: ARM Cortex-A53/A57 (ARMv8-A) requires an extra instruction to create the 128-bit result.
I'm considering adding this table to the first section.  It still needs further expansion.  Thoughts?  • Sbmeirow • Talk • 01:21, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiply Instruction Bit Sizes 

message: Please change all instances of the letter x used as a multiplication sign to ×.|Please markup the link in the first section as a ref. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.70.40.55 (talk) 
: Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 20:27, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs, x 

message: The AND in the second column generates (A0∧B1)∧(A1∧B0): the AND of all four inputs, the only way to get a product of 8 or higher, perfect for C3. Anding in any other AND of inputs, including the A1∧B1 shown, changes nothing. 188.109.124.100 (talk) 16:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not just that, the bottom-most AND gate (generating A1^B1) is also unneeded. The XOR generating C2 can be done as (A0∧B1)⊕(A1∧B0). D0SBoots (talk) 10:16, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant gate in 2×2 bit multiplier schematic
Wikipedia talk:Copyright on highway shields

message: It's against policy to have non-free images in Wikipedia namespace, as they are here. – Quadell (talk) (random) 18:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Other than showing them, how would you propose they be discussed? The policy exists to prevent decorative use and the creation of galleries. This usage is fine, at least while their copyright status is being probed. If WP's copyright policy says they can't be here so that people can see what they are discussing, then that policy is getting the way of improving the encyclopedia and can be ignored. However, once a consensus is reached, any images that are found to be under copyright and not usable as free images need to be removed forthwith. Vadder 18:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can discuss them by using text to link to the image discussion page. The name of the image discussion page is likely to be close to the name of the emblem, and names are not subject to copyright. True, WP:IAR suggests bending or breaking any rule that materially gets in the way of building a free encyclopedia. But if there are two things that IAR does not override, they are the law and meta:Foundation issues. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 20:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hiwassee/Ocoee Scenic River State Park

message: I am getting this message whenever I try and save a change to this page and cannot figure out why:-
The spam filter blocked your page save because it detected a blacklisted hyperlink. You may have added it yourself, the link may have been added by another editor before it was blacklisted, or you may be infected by spyware that adds links to wiki pages. You will need to remove all instances of the blacklisted URL before you can save.  
All I tried to do was categorised the page as a Tennessee state park but it will not let me. Davewild 18:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Microsoft Response Point

message: db-ad: This is a total advertisement.
169.237.69.217 18:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Nothing on the reference now to support that statement. 
Service Pack 2 supports SIP Trunks, which the original release apparently did not.
Aastra, the RP phone/server provider has on there product page "RP to Standards-Based SIP Phone Conversion Firmware"
This seems to indicate that RP uses a private protocol.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.214.18.240 (talk) 06:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "uses SIP as its signaling and call setup protocol." 

message: Advertisement or not, this product is being discontinued on 8.31.10 -- it was announced on the MS Response Point blog on 5.14.10
W4laf (talk) 16:23, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discontinued
Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/SalvNaut

message: Ive been secretly looking at this block and curiosly waiting the outcome. I just wanted to add my two cents in case anyone cares. I have been accused of sock puppetry by admins when i know i had nothing to do with it. I see a lot of cases like this that really don't have a leg to stand on. So some guy agreed with him when he was at his 3rr limit, so that guy has agreed with him before. So what, is it automatically sock puppetry when someone often agrees with the logic of someone else? I think this whole thing is absurd and the rules for claiming sock puppetry should be a bit stricter. If your going to block someone or accuse them of this you should have a bit more evidence then this (like trace the ip's see if they come from the same town). This whole thing is ridiculous, i agree with salv, and i really hope he gets that apology he is looking for. Of course now ill probably be blamed of being his sock puppet and get banned, lol. Best of luck! Debeo Morium 19:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:AltLaw

message: Bearian 17:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

message: You created your page one minute before I created AltLaw.org. I'll ask for a speedy delete, but I'd like to suggest we change the name of this page to AltLaw.org as I believe that is the correct name. Agreed? Ronnotel 19:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note - for now, I have just reverted a premature name change - AltLaw.org must be speedy deleted before we can change the name of this article. Ronnotel 19:17, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darn, beat me to it 

message: Because the name of the actual project is AltLaw (the press as well as the project's creators refer to it as such) - altlaw.org is the URL of its page (part of it, at least).  Perhaps a better solution would be to have the AltLaw.org entry point to the AltLaw entry?
Atypeoferror 19:27, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, you're right - I guess I saw it labeled differently at a blog post. Looking around the site it does look like they are branded as AltLaw. Sounds fine. Ronnotel 19:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is Tim Wu, one of the creators.  We do call it Altlaw, and sometimes "project Altlaw." Thanks for setting up this page.  If you have any questions just ask.  71.247.209.34 05:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tim, thanks for your comments. Would you happen to have a photograph or an image that would be suitable for the article and that you would be willing to release into the public domain? Hard to say exactly what that would be - perhaps something that shows the cases being digitized? If so, then go ahead and upload the image but it would be better if you let an editor not aligned with AltLaw actually add it to the article. Ronnotel 12:29, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I must respectfully disagree
Talk:List of Mr. Show with Bob and David episodes

message: *The result is a merge and redirect, based on no actual rebuttle to the proposed merger. Since this is a discussion, and not a vote, there needs to be more than simply "object".   BIGNOLE   (Contact me) 21:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I object.  Please use the Wikipedia:Television episodes/Review process. - Peregrine Fisher 05:46, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode notability

message: This is a boilerplate bit of advice to editors of television episode articles which have come under Wikipedia:Television episodes/Review.
There is fairly widespread consensus that not all television episodes are sufficiently notable to merit articles of their own in Wikipedia.  In the interest of fairness, the Wikipedia:Television episodes/Review process has been established, to determine whether it's possible to establish out-of-universe importance and real-world context for television episode articles.  For example, after uncontroversial discussion here, articles on individual episodes of The Simple Life were turned into redirects to List of The Simple Life episodes.
If you're interested in keeping episode articles, the key thing is to find reliable sources discussing individual episodes.  Sources which may help establish notability for these episodes include reviews in newspapers, discussion in specialist magazines, and detailed episode guides.   (Some of my fellow editors feel that episode guides aren't sufficiently independent of the subject to establish notability, but I disagree, especially for professionally published episode guides.)  The key thing for improvement of these articles is to include some real-world content (ratings are a good start) and information beyond plot summaries and cast lists.  If there are any books published about this series, see if the production or impact of individual episodes are discussed, and add that information to the episode articles.  If someone used sources like these books on a handful of these episode articles, to indicate that the episodes of this series have received sufficient coverage in reliable sources that any episode of the series could have encyclopedic coverage, I'd support leaving the other articles as they are, because the potential would have been demonstrated.  I hope that interested editors will take up this challenge, and improve the articles so that they won't be redirected.—Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 21:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advice to interested editors

message: There was a Mr. Show special to promote season 3, as well as a clip show for season 2.
It isn't available on the DVDs, so I'm not sure if that's the official title.
*Part one
*Part two
*Part three
Ernie and Bert fan (talk) 01:48, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mr. Show Press Conference
Talk:Ana Carolina

message: Ana Carolina is one of the most famous singers in Brazil and has already released 6 CDs--Guaxini 19:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: but she has a voice like a guy. Creepy =P Carolina came out in Veja magazine as bisexual[1]. They should not confuse "bisexual" with "transsexual" *snigger* 92.229.179.114 (talk) 23:24, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: lol  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.209.155.26 (talk) 18:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  lol 
Talk:Lygodium microphyllum

message: I removed a large chunk of plagiarism from the middle of the article as well as added sources and information on containment of Lygodium microphyllum.
--Luxembourg96 (talk) 07:16, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
--Stone (talk) 15:40, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: More on this plant may be sourced here:  https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/110270
Tzali (talk) 01:54, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information
Talk:Minnesota Roller Derby

message: The table as well as the mention in another section are bound to be eternally problematic. There is a statement in the Teams section which states, "Since the beginning of 2006, the interleague team has maintained a mixed record of 8-8, with a record of 7-8 against WFTDA-affiliated leagues." The cited source was retrieved in October 2007. While I know of a number of interleague bouts they've skated since then, not all of the sources are cite-worthy, and keeping something like this up-to-date for every derby league in existence probably isn't the job of Wikipedia editors.
The league's WFTDA-sanctioned bout history could simply be a link to their page on FlatTrackStats.com. TimBRoy (talk) 20:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bouting record 
Talk:Show Me Love (Robyn song)

message: I removed the "Criticism"-section. The complaint does not relate to this song, the lyrics of which certainly does not contain the controversial word. The alleged controversy is still mentioned on the page for the correct song: Handle Me. Where it's still unsourced, though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kim.o (talk • contribs) 17:13, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Schinus engleri

message: — Assignment last updated by Mousemia (talk) 18:35, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Organismal Diversity B

message: -Diaz, Rozana. “Floral Food Resources for Apis Mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in a ...” Floral Food Resources for Apis Mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in a Mountain Forest Area in Uruguay, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Posgrado, Montevideo, Uruguay, 4 June 2021, www.researchgate.net/profile/Horacio-Heinzen/publication/352384177_Floral_food_resources_for_Apis_mellifera_Hymenoptera_Apidae_in_a_mountain_forest_area_in_Uruguay/links/60c7b9bc92851c8e6395bdbc/Floral-food-resources-for-Apis-mellifera-Hymenoptera-Apidae-in-a-mountain-forest-area-in-Uruguay.pdf.
*This source talks about the seasons that the flower is in bloom specifically for Uruguay. So i'm probably going to have a section on seasonal growth for S. Engleri.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nbrecto25 (talk • contribs) 07:12, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Minnesota statistical areas

message: Population data from the United States Census Bureau may be updated either:
:(1)  Every ten years with data from the decennial United States Census, or
:(2)  Annually with data from the decennial United States Census and annual population estimates from the United States Census Bureau.
The following table shows when population data is available:
United States Census Bureau Population Data
Source:         	Decennial Census                 	Population Estimates
Date:           	April 1 of years divisible by ten	July 1 of years not divisible by ten
Region:         	date population data available   	date population data available
nation          	December                         	December 1
state           	December                         	December 1
statistical area	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
county          	February-March of next year      	April 1 of next year
places          	February-March of next year      	June 1 of next year
Please contact me if you have any questions.  Yours aye,  Buaidh  21:35, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population updates 
Talk:Dipylon Master

message: The prothesis link in the article goes to a disambiguation page with three possibilities, none of which seem to apply to this article: two are basically for alternate spellings of prosthesis and the other refers to preparation of bread and wine for the Eucharist. So this link needs to be (a) removed, (b) linked to an appropriate article, or (c) explained in this article. Since I don't know what prothesis is, someone else will need to decide which of these actions is appropriate and carry it out. But the current link is simply wrong as is. -Fenevad (talk) 10:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prothesis link 

message: We should change the Cat name to "Dipylon Painter". The Dipylon Master was an Sculpturer (manufactured the "Kuros of the Holy Gate"). Also Boardman ("Early Greek Vase Painting" called him "Painter". Marcus Cyron (talk) 03:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A google and a google scholar search reveals more entries for "Dipylon Master" than "Dipylon Painter". Common usage (as well as common sense) is to be preferred. The same would apply to the Euphronios krater. Twospoonfuls (ειπέ) 10:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: This page should include links to full articles on the Dipylon Amphora and Dipylon Krater (the two most famous vases supposedly made by this painter).  If those pages do not yet exist, someone should make them! Jpaga (talk) 15:14, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name vases 

message: The lead section is easy to understand. There is a clear structure to the article due to it being fairly short. I would suggest including more information on the artworks mentioned in the article. I think this would give it some balanced coverage to the article. It is neutral content and has reliable sources. This article really just needs more content and It will be great. Gascon25 (talk) 23:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  peer review edit/suggestions
Talk:Wallmakers

message: Does this page need to exist?  There is little info here that isn't in the five great charters article Weaselandalf 19:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Please see this discussion, where there is a proposal to merge this article into another one. Comments are welcome. sbfw | talk 00:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge
Talk:Matis

message: not sure what this means. Feel free to return it once clarified. It was in the part where they were talking about people dying from lack of medical care: "of Brazilian government that did not have even a backboard engine working to bring people to receive medical care (ARISI 2007)." Elinruby (talk) 21:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  questioned text
Talk:Shortnose sturgeon

message: I emailed USF&WS about this error.  Also, could not find the image (one that was on taxobox) at the USF&WS Digital Library website as cited in the Commons license, which means it is invalid anyway. The image is a young lake sturgeon, not a shortnose sturgeon.  See the following images so you'll know what a shortnose sturgeon looks like if you've never seen one. The end of their snout does not turn up, rather their snout is short, fat, and round.  USF&WS also misidentified another photograph of a large Gulf sturgeon, and labeled it a shortnose sturgeon. . It's preposterous.  Atsme☯Consult 04:00, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture on the taxobox is not a shortnose sturgeon 

message: Possibly useful as background: http://www.sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=E7D5D731-1 COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Shortnose Sturgeon Acipenser brevirostrum in Canada - 2015 Eastmain (talk • contribs)  21:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Canadian species at risk report
Talk:Religious Kibbutz Movement

message: OK, I messed up. I think since this article is about the umbrella organization it should be called HaKibbutz HaDati, not Kibbutz Dati. Please comment. --Shuki 19:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't it be better as Religious Kibbutz Movement, as this is how they call themselves in English on their website? Number 57 09:33, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. --Shuki 21:38, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: name change

message: :Any additional comments:
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
It was requested that this article be renamed and it was done without a debate --Number 57 14:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Is "Movement" actually part of a proper name here?  If not, it should be changed to a lower-case "m".  I honestly have no idea, but I think and hope that this is a non-controversial question that can be addressed and resolved quickly, while the debate about renaming the associated category is taking place.  (I've suggested renaming the category to match this article, whereever it might end up.)  Xtifr tälk 22:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's part of the name. Please visit the official website in ex-links. --Shuki 06:40, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As Shuki says, it is part of the name, and should removed capitalised - it is not a Religious Kibbutz movement, but rather the Religious Kibbutz Movement. Number 57 08:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems clear enough, thanks.  Xtifr tälk 12:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Movement" or "movement"? 

message: The article currently reads:
"Its membership includes 19 communities, 16 of which function as traditional kibbutzim, while the other two have the status of Moshav Shitufi"
Last I checked, 16+2=18, not 19.  Anyways, the list of individual towns lists 3 moshavim, which would solve the riddle.  Anyone, if you know the list is correct, care to fix it up?62.219.163.100 (talk) 11:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad Arithmetic