lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kalpa (time)

message: The links to Asankya are not useful. [Asankya] redirects to [Large numbers] but Large numbers doesn't ever mention Asankya. I'm left wondering what it is? 67.168.206.135 (talk) 18:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This was resolved sometime in the past. Jroberson108 (talk) 12:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asankya 

message: It is just the term "kalpa" which is used in the Mahabharata for the first time. The time span of a kalpa is first mentioned in Rigveda 4.58.3 (http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/rigveda/rv04058.htm) similar in Yajurveda Samhita 17, 91 (941) which seems to be a mnemonic.--87.178.201.105 (talk) 07:02, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't literally say a kalpa, but has been interpretated to mean it, which the hymns can have many meanings. As I recall, Vaishnavism takes the numbers—four, three, two, and seven—to mean 4, 3, 2, and seven 0s, or 4,320,000,000, the length of a kalpa in human years. A reliable source is needed. Jroberson108 (talk) 12:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kalpa in Vedas 

message: The present kalpa is called SVETA VARAHA KALPA and we are currently in the Vaivasvata Manvantara. Any Brahman who does his rituals would know this. 
The wiki write up states something else and that is incorrect. Period.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.65.37.52 (talk) 07:34, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This was resolved sometime in the past. Jroberson108 (talk) 12:51, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Present Kalpa 

message: There is complete misinterpretation and misrepresentation about yuga’s year.
You can see whole video of sadhguru jaggi about yuga cycle and it’s years which realistically fit with both Mahabharat(5000 years ago) and ramayan(7000 years ago).
Yuga cycles should be like this;-
Kaliyuga;- 1296
Dwaper yuga:- 2596
Tretrayuga;- 3888
Satyuga;- 5184 2605:8D80:667:FC8A:B4FA:72C8:959D:A534 (talk) 06:26, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadhguru is not considered a reliable source. See WP:RS. Jroberson108 (talk) 13:27, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misinterpretation of yuga’s years
Talk:Kalapa (atomism)

message: Vital mistake on main page--Prestigiouzman (talk) 08:49, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Kalapas are not Physical in nature, by [[Vedic]] standard they can be likened to the term [[wavlet]].
Talk:Tushita

message: My hunch is that the Chinese translation for Tushita is more likely a transliteration (Doushuai) than something to be translated literally.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.197.194.147 (talk) 23:54, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead the war helmets 

message: Is there a reason the article is titled Tushita when all the quotes used in the article as well as every single one of the sources used for the article spell it Tusita?  Wikiman5676 (talk) 05:18, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: ::https://www.wisdomlib.org/definition/tushita
JarrahTree 08:29, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  further explanation of the two usages
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Stoneham, Massachusetts

message: The unsourced category was removed because all lists of National Registered Historic Places are generated from the National Park Service. Their Template is the source. No new place can be added unless it is put on the National List. This and other articles were created as transfers verbatim from the List of Registered Historic Places in Middlesex County, Massachusetts, which Wikipedia said was way too long.  The original list has links to each new list under the city or town's heading it was transferred from. Size of original article was reduced by about 75%. clariosophic 22:49, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Winchester, Massachusetts

message: All lists of National Registered Historic Places are generated from the National Park Service. Their Template is the source. No new place can be added unless it is put on the National List. This and other articles were created as transfers verbatim from the List of Registered Historic Places in Middlesex County, Massachusetts, which Wikipedia said was way too long.  The original list has links to each new list under the city or town's heading it was transferred from. Size of original article was reduced by about 75%. clariosophic 22:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: *Scanned links with photos. One dab correction. No new photos found KudzuVine (talk) 21:45, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2009 Scan
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Arlington, Massachusetts

message: All lists of National Registered Historic Places are generated from the National Park Service. Their Template is the source. No new place can be added unless it is put on the National List. This and other articles were created as transfers verbatim from the List of Registered Historic Places in Middlesex County, Massachusetts, which Wikipedia said was way too long.  The original list has links to each new list under the city or town's heading it was transferred from. Size of original article was reduced by about 75%. clariosophic 23:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Concord, Massachusetts

message: All lists of National Registered Historic Places are generated from the National Park Service. Their Template is the source. No new place can be added unless it is put on the National List. This and other articles were created as transfers verbatim from the List of Registered Historic Places in Middlesex County, Massachusetts, which Wikipedia said was way too long.  The original list has links to each new list under the city or town's heading it was transferred from. Size of original article was reduced by about 75%. clariosophic 23:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Hanover (CDP), New Hampshire

message: Are the poverty numbers correct?
They don't make any sense to me. 1% of the families, 0% of the population under 18, and 4% of the population over 18 are below the poverty line, yet it's 14.5% of the total population that is considered to be below it.
Please check the numbers. I think it is not 14% but 4%.
--Andres07 23:02, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Anhalt-Bernburg-Schaumburg-Hoym

message: There's a map showing Anhalt-Bernburg at 
.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maproom (talk • contribs) 14:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 
Talk:Ellis D Fogg

message: As much as I admire his work, and belong to the generation that was teenaged when all this was first happening, with a capital H, this article reads more like a web-page promoting Mr Foley-Fogg.
:Other than the last paragraph I disagree and don’t think this is any more promotional than any bio of a living artist on Wikipedia.
SproulesLane (talk) 03:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an encyclopaedic article
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Somerville, Massachusetts

message: All lists of National Registered Historic Places are generated from the National Park Service. Their Template is the source. No new place can be added unless it is put on the National List. This and other articles were created as transfers verbatim from the List of Registered Historic Places in Middlesex County, Massachusetts, which Wikipedia said was way too long.  The original list has links to each new list under the city or town's heading it was transferred from. Size of original article was reduced by about 75%. clariosophic 23:07, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Yesterday I changed the coords given for the subject houses. In the case of the Charles Adams-Woodbury Locke House, I also changed the coords at the individual article.  The Adams-Magoun individual article was already OK.
Reasons:
1) Charles Adams-Woodbury Locke House
The coords given mapped a house on Adams Street, one block over.  Since I had owned the subject house for three years, it was easy to pick the house from an aerial/satellite image at earthools.org and supply those corrds.  This was apparently a problem translating NAD 1927 into WGS 84 as it was a small error.
2) Adams Magoun House
I called up the location of all the NRHPs places in Somerville, using the tool "Map All Coordinates from Bing" (the similar Google Maps tool wasn't working). It was immediately obvious that the coords given here (which were 42°24′0″N 70°44′9″W) mapped to a place about 15 miles to the East, out in Massachusetts Bay. I corrected the coords, again using Earthools.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 14:43, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks!  Good, glad to see you understand about the coordinates conversions issues.  Many Massachusetts NRHP places will be located a bit off, due to that.  Issues like the Magoun house being way off are more obvious errors, would hope those get noticed and fixed. A lot like that have been fixed.  Again, thanks. doncram (talk) 19:16, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Charles Adams-Woodbury Locke House and Adams Magoun House

message: * Scanned the links. Made 2 dab corrections and added 1 photo from the linked page. KudzuVine (talk) 20:05, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: September Scnn

message: Alewife Brook Parkway is missing from the Somerville list. --Polaron | Talk 14:56, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Wakefield, Massachusetts

message: All lists of National Registered Historic Places are generated from the National Park Service. Their Template is the source. No new place can be added unless it is put on the National List. This and other articles were created as transfers verbatim from the List of Registered Historic Places in Middlesex County, Massachusetts, which Wikipedia said was way too long.  The original list has links to each new list under the city or town's heading it was transferred from. Size of original article was reduced by about 75%. clariosophic 23:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: *Scanned links and made two dab corrections. No photos found on linked pages.KudzuVine (talk) 20:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: HABS pic is available for Colonel James Hartshorne House, 41 Church Street, Wakefield, Middlesex County, MA, located probably in either Church-Lafayette Streets Historic District or in Common District (Wakefield, Massachusetts.  If someone could upload that, then there'd be at least one pic in the list-article.... doncram (talk) 21:16, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've checked with Street View, and the house is in the Church-Lafayette Streets HD.  I'll get the photo uploaded later.  Nyttend (talk) 21:53, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Photo here.  Nyttend (talk) 23:00, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: September Scan

message: Breakheart Reservation Parkways is missing from the Wakefield list. --Polaron | Talk 15:33, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing
Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Waltham, Massachusetts

message: All lists of National Registered Historic Places are generated from the National Park Service. Their Template is the source. No new place can be added unless it is put on the National List. This and other articles were created as transfers verbatim from the List of Registered Historic Places in Middlesex County, Massachusetts, which Wikipedia said was way too long.  The original list has links to each new list under the city or town's heading it was transferred from. Size of original article was reduced by about 75%. clariosophic 23:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I believe the images of the Harrington Block at 376-390 Moody St. and the Stark Building at 416-424 Moody St. are reversed. The Harrington Block building is clearly labeled front and center, is in good repair, and ends the 300 block. The Stark Building with its rounded projection (= Queen Anne style?) is much more run down and begins the 400 block. Joel (talk) 21:21, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, fixed now. Joel (talk) 23:53, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Misidentification
Template talk:California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

message: Some of the Links need to be fixed as they go to other documents made referring to other articles irrevalent to Cal Poly.
Overall the beta is here based on the CSU Pomona infobox.
(Justsomeboi 23:14, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

message: :someone left me a message on my board when i changed it to cal poly. someone then changed it to add the logo as :cal poly slo. then someone took it off. however, another person wants me to add a logo that has the logo as California polytechnic state university instead of the current text, so i wanted to ask you guys should i add a logo that has the whole name or just leave it as it is. i dont want to change it if you guys dont want me too. if not i could make another logo.Javiern (talk) 00:37, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: the one i made right know looks similar to the current cal poly pomona logo except it does not have the pomona portion. so i will wait a few days to give you a chance to reply prior to me uploading it in order to get feedback on your thoughtsJaviern (talk) 00:46, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you are going to upload a logo, make sure it uses the full name of the university (California Polytechnic State University) rather than its elided version (Cal Poly San Luis Obispo among other variations). Also, make sure it's self-made otherwise it does not quealify for free-use.--Marco Guzman, Jr (talk) 00:24, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  template logo
Talk:Else Feldmann

message: She began working full-time for the Arbeiter-Zeitung in 1923 until the newspaper, along with other socialist and communist political activity, was forbidden by the Nazi Party in 1934.
CORRECTION: the National Socialists were forbidden in Austria in 1934, the Arbeiter-Zeitung went underground due to the Austrian AUSTROFASCIST regime in 1934. see civil war events of February 1934  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.0.120.109 (talk) 18:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Port Kaituma

message: Is acquired the correct word for stealing stuff these days?
: Presume you're referring to the mention that Kaituma residents "acquired" many items from Jonestown in the aftermath of the massacre/mass suicide.  Stealing from dead people is still stealing of course, but likely whatever was left in Jonestown was regarded as abandoned property with nobody likely to claim legitimate ownership of it, so I suppose they felt they may as well "acquire" it rather than just let it rot in the jungle.  I doubt any legitmate claimants, if there were any, would have cared to make any claims om it anyway.  So to call it "stealing" would be pushing the POV that the acts, technically criminal as they may be, were regarded as crimes by anyone interesting in prosecuting anyone for them... both POV and not really supported.  I am also not sure of what the laws in Guyana were in 1978... they may well consider it perfectly legal to acquire what is regarded as abandoned property.  Anyway I don't think the word "stealing" is neutral or accurate in this case.  24.8.252.164 (talk) 05:19, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Emil Młynarski

message: Note for future editors. A very short biography of Emil Mlynarski can be found in the book:
Modern Musicians by J. Cuthbert Hadden (First published by T.N.Foulis in 1913) - (my copy is the September 1918 Foulis reprint)
I'm using my copy but four public domain copies are available at the Internet Archive. Here's two of those:
http://archive.org/details/modernmusiciansb00haddiala
http://archive.org/details/cu31924022415297
I have a different image in my book. A photograph. I will scan it and add it to this article. I will not be removing the existing image.
Sluffs (talk) 22:17, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Musicians by J. Cuthbert Hadden
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Northern Ireland flag usage

message: Archives
----
# Archive 1
# Archive 2
This mediation is closed.  Please do not continue to make edits to this page.  Thank you.  --דניאל - Dantheman531 02:59, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I just stumbled across this, having just made some edits (not involving flags) to one of the templates involved in this dispute, and I can't see any actual decision here. I'm very confused — what was the eventual outcome? — OwenBlacker (Talk) 23:33, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decision?
Talk:Disappearance of Clayton Kratz

message: Some additional sources suggested by User:John Broughton at User talk:Callan93:
A quick Google search showed a number of promising sources, so I encourage you to pursue this: , , , newspaper article, Fretz, Clarence Y. "The Story of Clayton- Kratz." Youth Messenger, Lancaster Mennonite Conference, Lincoln Highway, East
Lancaster, Pa. Series of 14 articles (August 1, 1965 to November 7, 1965). (Clayton Kratz in Russian relief work in 1920.), cited at http://www.bethelks.edu/mennonitelife/bibliographies/1969a.pdf.
And, from my comments at Wikipedia:Drawing board#Clayton Kratz, "The books and other published material used as refs for the Molotschna, Mennonite Central Committee, and maybe even Russian Mennonite articles seem likely candidates [as sources]. Mainstream news sources would be best--one source also mentions article(s) in the Harrisonburg (VA) Daily News Record." Hellosandimas 23:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Antero Manninen

message: This is not a fan page. You may find it sweet to list the name of his cats and chickens, but it's not something that people want to know from a encycloptic article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.72.192.105 (talk) 10:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia Clean.up

message: I know the space thing is a little silly but I want to be super specfic --Motaros 01:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Space

message: The reason why specfic words are linked is because I like it like that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Motaros (talk • contribs) 02:23, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but it is Wikipedia policy not to wikilink words needlessly. Your liking it is irrelevant. JIP | Talk 06:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: Funny how Antero is the only band member who gets such an detailed page for himself, while the really important ones just have stubs  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.1.175.165 (talk) 21:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This page was pretty rediculous...I took out the stuff that was not strictly Antero related and which is also on the Apocalyptica page. Gueneverey 02:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WFF?? 

message: I have never contributed to wikipedia really, so I'm not sure how it works, but I can find no source that says that Antero Manninen is deaf. Yet he is listed in the "deaf musicians" category.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.111.59.45 (talk) 08:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that category appears to be a remnant of past vandalism.  It has been removed.  --Gueneverey (talk) 21:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deafness
Talk:Emperor Kōgen

message: The Imperial mon (emblem) was added in the Notes section in 2010.  In 2012, the image was removed from this and other articles about Japanese emperors -- compare here. Zenwort's edit summary is clear and reasonable --img of Imperial seal removed, this was not used before the Muromachi era 
The use of this symbol is justified because this article is an important part of a grouping of articles about the emperors of Japan -- see Imperial Household Agency (Kunaichō):  孝元天皇 (08).  Does this rationale provide a good enough reason for it to be restored? --Enkyo2 (talk) 15:48, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Image of Imperial symbol
Talk:Emperor Kōrei

message: 75 Year reign? Wouldn't that make him among the longest reigning monarchs in world history?68.202.82.33 (talk) 12:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wow

message: The Imperial mon (emblem) was added in the Notes section in 2010.  In 2012, the image was removed from this and other articles about Japanese emperors -- compare here. Zenwort's edit summary is clear and reasonable --img of Imperial seal removed, this was not used before the Muromachi era 
The use of this symbol is justified because this article is an important part of a grouping of articles about the emperors of Japan -- see Imperial Household Agency (Kunaichō):  孝霊天皇 (07).  Does this rationale provide a good enough reason for it to be restored? --Enkyo2 (talk) 16:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The image is appropriate for the "monarchs of japan" infobox (in fact the emblem is duplicated there), but it's very out of place in the body of this article, especially when it's just hanging out next to a list of references at the bottom. I'm removing it again. -165.234.252.11 (talk) 17:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Image of Imperial symbol
Talk:Endre Bálint

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Hut 8.5 22:39, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem