Talk:The Breakers

message: Is anything created by the US Gov really in the PD ? If so, we can copy verbatim from , which is very informative.
:Yes, you could copy from this one verbatim, it's an official document. It's rather more detailed than we really want for WP though (in the same way that articles reference the results from a scientific paper, without actually including every detail of experimental methodology that the paper must include), so excerpting seems more useful than wholesale data dumping. Stan 22:57, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not believe it is too detailed. After all, "The Breakers" is more notable than "Sonic the Hedgehog" is, aight ? Sonic the Hedgehog and Category:Sonic the Hedgehog characters are excessively detailed. Wikipedia is not a paper encyclopedia.-- ExpImptalkcon 02:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I now incorporated what i believe are the most important parts. if you want, you can yet salvage lots of history-factlets from it.-- ExpImptalkcon 02:53, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there are other articles that are also excessively detailed, and there are a bunch of editors who would take a hatchet to them if not for the legions of fanboys zealously guarding every bit of drivel... Part of being a compendium of knowledge is judicious summarization, irrespective of paper or online. Stan 20:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Domain ? 

message: Don't some of the family still live on the third floor, and most of it is off limits to tourists? --RThompson82 (talk) 09:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Third floor still a dwelling?

message: I'm not sure how to do this, but somebody needs to shrink those pictures. Right now it's overtaking the text and chopping up the interface.
24.130.3.207 (talk) 05:13, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture Formatting 

message: I deleted one sentence which listed the species of shrubs planted next to the terrace, since the same information is provided later in the paragraph. There's still some redundancy given that the same three species are listed two times, but since those are evidently descriptions of different parts of the grounds, I let them stand. 206.208.104.20 (talk) 12:40, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundancy in description of plantings 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on The Breakers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090812035956/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1058&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1058&ResourceType=Building
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040630201051/http://www.cr.nps.gov/nhl/designations/samples/ri/breakers.pdf to http://www.cr.nps.gov/nhl/designations/samples/ri/breakers.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040630201051/http://www.cr.nps.gov/nhl/designations/samples/ri/breakers.pdf to http://www.cr.nps.gov/nhl/designations/samples/ri/breakers.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040630201051/http://www.cr.nps.gov/nhl/designations/samples/ri/breakers.pdf to http://www.cr.nps.gov/nhl/designations/samples/ri/breakers.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:26, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The prior mansion on the site is described as burning on November 25, 1892. Then the rebuild is described, and it's stated that "Expansion was finally finished in 1892."  That doesn't seem possible in 30-some days.  Was it actually 1895 that expansion was finally finished?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.134.119 (talk) 04:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect date?