Talk:Second-wave feminism

message: This article focuses almost exclusively on the American situation.  It would be good to see subsequent efforts include women's experience and legislation from other countries, even if just western countries to start with. User:Lyn V C 03:46, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Four years later, your comment is still true. I will try to flesh out the article a little over the next few weeks; it would be great if others can help. Sue Gardner (talk) 03:49, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:    Still a nice gallery. –84.46.53.87 (talk) 05:22, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Article focuses on USA

message: Some sections on this talk page could be archived, and while I know (or rather: knew) how to do this manually I also recall that some anti-vandal triggers won't let me do it anymore in namespace 2 (talk) on enwiki. Please consider to archive everything before 2010 without later replies, or similar, and get rid of the checked=true bot modifications while at it. –84.46.53.87 (talk) 05:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Implemented (hopefully) with this edit. –84.46.52.31 (talk) 22:59, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meta: Archive 

message: Third Wave feminism outside the Anglo-Saxon context is often second wave in the Anglo-Saxon feminist context.  This comes up in a number of non-English sources.  Is there anyway the article could be split with this article disambiguated to provide a better understanding here without reinforcing the US centric perspective?   This problematic naming being out of sync is referenced in Spanish Wikipedia with :es:Segunda ola del feminismo en EEUU and :es:Segunda ola del feminismo. :es:Primera ola del feminismo. --LauraHale (talk) 12:02, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second or third-wave feminism (Third-wave for Europe, Second-wave for Americans) 

message: Hi Laura, this is to explain why I reverted your recent changes. This article is not in good shape and needs to be fixed. But your edits seemed to me to be original research, e.g. the lead: "Second-wave feminism describes two distinct types of feminism. Anglo-Saxon first-wave feminism is second-wave for Europeans and Latin American feminists. Second-wave American and British feminism is also third-wave for Europeans and Latin Americans." You also removed the entire overview section.
Such drastic changes need consensus and have to be supported by high-quality academic sources. It seems odd to me to assume that Britain isn't part of Europe, and that British feminism = "Anglo-Saxon feminism", whatever that is. I'm also puzzled by the idea that Germany or Italy, for example, had already experienced first- and second-wave feminism before the US or UK. You made the claim but didn't explain what you meant or give examples. I stand to be corrected, but I would need to see high-quality sources that support it.
If you want to add a section about other definitions of "second wave", that would be fine, so long as you have good sources, and so long as you explain clearly what you mean. SarahSV (talk) 20:54, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Endorsed by at least one IP ;-) Exporting over 40 KB US-centric stuff to an US-centric page is an interesting idea, but looking at over 50 abortion law pages for all US states and even some territories I'm unconvinced that this helps. Some rogue states could be relevant, e.g., Alabama, Mississippi, …, and maybe a remotely related US-centric list created by John Oliver could help to figure it out. –84.46.52.138 (talk) 03:12, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

text: FYI: Talk:John Oliver#Feminist. –84.46.52.79 (talk) 06:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent revert

message: — Assignment last updated by Laziestllama27 (talk) 15:35, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Women's, Gender and Sexuality Studies-16