Talk:Heliodorus pillar

message: Merge from Heliodorus is not nessesary as both articles potentially are quite large. Wikidās ॐ 20:11, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: This is an interesting article, but it needs references to establish its notability. Prsaucer1958 (talk) 23:11, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This article gives no mention of when the pillar was discovered.106.51.19.129 (talk) 09:27, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Not sure why there was a change in the quote from the 1983 book.  Presumably the old quote was wrong or the new quote is... AnonMoos (talk) 11:30, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Suspicious change in direct quote

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Heliodorus pillar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040812200836/http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/Docs/HISTORY/PRIMARYDOCS/EPIGRAPHY/HeliodorusPillar.htm to http://projectsouthasia.sdstate.edu/docs/HISTORY/PRIMARYDOCS/EPIGRAPHY/HeliodorusPillar.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:35, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Where do you see Heliodorus in the D'Ancona paper? Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 17:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't notice that you'd added the attribution to Dahlquist in the previous edit during my rollback. My bad.—Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 17:14, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Cpt: I kept Julia Shaw, in the Sanchi section. What I removed is offtopic, non-RS (theoi.com? + many para unsourced) and what looks like OR:Synthesis. Have you checked the sources? I moved the Dahlquist part to a later section, but it needs fixing. If you or someone can add RS, scrub the OR out, I will welcome the content back. Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 20:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verifiability and OR:Synthesis 

message: Allan Dalquist book : Megasthenes and Indian Religion: A Study 
 in Motives and Type is cited for alternative interpretation. In this work author seeks to establish the influence of Christianity on Krishnaism. Hence author goes after all pre-christian references to Krishna like  1. Panini's Vasudeva Sutra, 2. Megasthenes 3.Patanjali and 4.Inscriptions 5.Buddhist references.
His polemics against Heliodorus pillar inscriptions are plain wrong.(refer page 167 of the book). He claims this temple to be Buddhist Indra temple
without a shred of evidence.
The book is religiously motivated and this section is best dropped if it is based on this book.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.207.143.16 (talk) 17:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative interpretation 

message: HyuuU 205.253.126.30 (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  G 

message: What "Central Western epigraphic Prakrit language" was used for the Brahmi script on the Heliodorus pillar?  Was this Maharashtri Prakrit?  Nicole Sharp (talk) 06:37, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prakrit language