lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mass flow (life sciences)

message: The article should provide a typcial symbol used in formulas for mass flow.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.94.244.204 (talk) 12:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have re-organized the article by adding subsections. My future revisions will follow this outline:
    1 Physical considerations
        1.1 Conservation of mass, momentum, and energy
        1.2 Bernoulli’s equation
        1.3 Reynold’s number
        1.4 Gravity
        1.5 Causes of pressure gradients in biological systems
    2 in Animal Biology
        2.1 Locomotion
        2.2 Secretion of glandular products
        2.3 Circulatory systems – Hemorheology
        2.4 Lymphatic system
        2.5 Excretory system
        2.6 Digestive systems
        2.7 Water flow in sea stars, sea cucumbers, sponges
        2.8 Respiration
    3 Plant Biology
        3.1 Xylem
        3.2 Phloem
    4 See also
    5 References
I am fairly new to editing Wikipedia. Any and all feedback is welcome.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezrysm (talk • contribs) 16:56, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beginning revisions
Talk:Momentum diffusion

message: The introduction had: Momentum diffusion refers to spread of momentum between particles [..] In fluids, this is what causes viscosity. The article ends with: The rate of transport is governed by the viscosity of the fluid and the momentum gradient. It doesn't make sense that the viscosity is caused by the diffusion yet the rate of diffusion is governed by the viscosity. I've changed the former to match the latter. 78.149.18.53 (talk) 10:22, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Causal relationship
Talk:Noise reduction coefficient

message: Due to the formulas used, the coefficient is not a percentage and values larger than one are possible. (and common)/
So far as I can understand from the source cited, it is just a percentage which sometimes goes beyond 100% only due to the limitations of measurment techniques. 46.16.177.18 (talk) 06:41, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's impossible for a material to absorb more than 100% of sound at a given frequency. So, no, it's not a percentage. This source explains it better than I could: The ASTM C423 standard makes it possible to arrive at absorption coefficients and, therefore, NRCs that are greater than 1.00. This may be counterintuitive since many references define the Sabine alpha and NRC as the percentage of sound absorbed by a material. This treatment of alphas and NRCs as percentages, however, is not really accurate. The formulae used in the standard to measure absorption are dependent on: the decay of sound in the test room, room volume, room temperature and the area of Chamber floor covered by the test material. Sabine absorption and Sabine alphas come from the fact that the absorption is calculated using the Sabine equation. Nowhere in the ASTM C423 standard is there a reference to Sabine alphas being equal to percentages of any kind. Therefore, numbers greater than 1.00 are possible. This means that Sabine alphas are simply a representation of the relative amount of sound absorbed by the material. (Relative to the absorption without treatment in the room.) Higher numbers mean more absorption in that frequency band. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.177.226.132 (talk) 05:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not percentage?
Talk:Plume (fluid dynamics)

message: The last part of the subject section (just below the four numbered comments) needs to be rewritten or removed. As it now stands, it is completely incomprehensible. mbeychok (talk) 22:32, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no one has responded to my above comment, I will remove that incomprehensible section. mbeychok (talk) 17:17, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The section entitled "Simple plume modelling" needs rewriting

message: A rocket "plume" doesn't seem like a very good example of a plume. It's really a vertical contrail, it's verticalness caused not by the motion of one fluid through another away from the source, but by the source moving through the atmosphere and leaving smoke and water vapor along the way, a cloud rather than a plume. Craig Butz (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, its a jet not a plume. Replaced image with an image of a plume. Kees08 (talk) 02:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove or move Space Shuttle image?
Talk:Heinrich von Tunna

message: I have not found any English-language sources describing this individual. William Urban's The Teutonic Knights merely names him as "Heinrich Bart" in its list of grand masters, while German sources refer to him as "Heinrich von Tunna". "Heinrich Bart" is used less in German as it also refers to a 19th century explorer. "Henry of Tunna" seems to be original research. Olessi 00:36, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Template talk:Test3a

message: Please add the below to the top of the pgae.

--Bsherr (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've speedily closed the TfD listing, so this is not needed.  —David Levy 16:55, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  tdf 

message: Please add  to the top of the page. Thanks!
EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 18:59, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 09:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 7 April 2015 

message: This template and many of the others listed at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_April_26#Old_Test_Edit_Warnings still have TfD tags on them.  Please implement the redirects according to the discussion results.  Also, some of the old templates-to-be-redirected are not protected; should they be?
15.211.201.88 (talk) 01:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: /  Template removed, that discussion isn't very clears as to WHERE this should be redirected, pinging closing admin to come clean this up:  — xaosflux Talk 04:34, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hopefully  can provide some suggestions for the redirect targets.  Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 14:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well it's been 3 months, and I was bold and redirected the pages according to the suggestions at the closed TfD discussion. I'm redirecting this page to  per suggestion, since the phrasing on this template is about removal of content. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 01:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 9 February 2016
Talk:Princess Frederica Charlotte of Prussia

message: About her: :Image:Gillray-Fashionable-Contrasts.jpg -- AnonMoos 22:04, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-famous image

message: Her mother is incorrect - her stepmother is shown in the chart.  I'd fix it if I knew how.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.123.231.229 (talk) 01:21, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction Needed to Ancestry Chart 

message: I recall reading this in a textbook in college many years ago (1970s). The suggestive cartoon, according to the caption in the book, illustrated the Duke was much taller man than herself, so I doubt this was purely artistic licence.Cloptonson (talk) 14:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Gilray cartoon

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Princess Frederica of Prussia (1796–1850) that affects a redirect to this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 21:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress
Talk:Heinz Fütterer

message: Jew Catcher?
This man was 13 years old (!) when WWII ended. Of course it is absolute nonsense , that he was a „jew Catcher“ while the Nazis controlled Germany and killed the jews. This rediculous nonsense must be deleted!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.108.10.171 (talk) 05:34, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Heinz_F%C3%BCtterer&diff=882754347&oldid=882698052 --Xquenda (talk) 18:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Ansanus

message: This article is actually unreferenced. The two notes in the Infobox do not address the life of Ansano directly. I presume that the material is derived from one of the external links.
The source material for the article is completely unbalanced. It depends on an uncritical and one-sided repetition of devotional and hagiographical web sites. No effort is made to present other points of view, or even to show skepticism over miraculous events, such as a person surviving being boiled (not just quick-dipped) in oil. It is a commonplace to attribute martyrdoms to the Diocletianic persecution of 303, but most of them appear to be fictional.
For some balance, and details, see:
*
*Barcellona, Francesco Scorza (1991), "Un martire locale: Ansano," Bollettino senese di storia patria 97 (Siena: Tip. e Lit. Sordo-Muti di L. Lazzeri 1991), pp. 1-25.
*Lanzoni, Francesco (1927). Le diocesi d'Italia dalle origini al principio del secolo VII (an. 604). Faenza: F. Lega, pp.  pp. 564-565. 
*
*Bisogni, F. (1991), "L'iconografia di Ansano," in: F. E. Consolino (ed.), I santi patroni senesi (Siena 1991), pp. 95-115.
*Kemp-Welch, Alice (1911), "The Emblem of St. Ansano," The Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs Vol. 18, No. 96 (March 1911), pp. 337-339.
--Vicedomino (talk) 18:13, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV problems
Talk:Heinz Wossipiwo

message: Can you provide any source that claims Wossipiwo represented West Germany, as you wrote ? Vanjagenije (talk) 20:04, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies. That was a mistake from me during my edit in February. I must have got my Easts and Wests confused when I was removing the birthplace from the lead (per MOS:BLPlead) and rewording it. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 20:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: West German?
Talk:Henning Schmitz

message: Henning Schmitz has a studio called Studio X 1 in Koln.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.203.238.19 (talk) 14:34, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Studio X Koln 

message: according to the info on MAN MACHINE he was an assistant on THE MASCHINE in 1978 ,That was 13 years prior to his work as a member of kraftwerk  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:191:5FA0:E9ED:739A:9C4A:CB85 (talk) 18:22, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  MENSCH MASCHINE/MAN MACHINE production as an assistent
Talk:Henk Schiffmacher

message: I was wondering if this is the guy who collaborated with Philips Design on SKIN:Tattoo (http://www.design.philips.com/about/design/designportfolio/design_futures/tattoo.page)
If anyone has a reference for thiss, it should probably be included in his Bio. 130.15.5.141 (talk) 00:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Henry of Eppenstein

message: since the ruling dates mentioned in the stub are the same as the birth and death dates, can we assume that's really the case?; they could only be ruling dates; there are other examples of nobility who didn't rule until after they were born. hope I don't sound confusing.--FeanorStar7 15:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth and death categories
Talk:Battle of Dawmat al-Jandal

message: Its all original research. Misdemenor (talk) 06:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Must be sourced 
Talk:Prandtl–Meyer expansion fan

message: In the first paragraph:
'In case of a smooth corner, these waves can be extended backwards to meet at a point'
Is this - '(all) waves . . . meet at a POINT' - always true? (I don't think it is: indeed, I'm reasonably certain that it is not).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.22.87 (talk) 22:43, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This was corrected in the October 2014 edits, but for anyone wondering, this is only true for circular corners. 209.87.255.222 (talk) 20:45, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smooth corner 

message: In the image of an "expansion process through a single shock" shouldn't the w1 and w2 be perpendicular to the shock?
--Joao30121998 (talk) 04:42, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Impossibility of expanding a flow through a single "shock" wave 

message: We say that the Prandtl–Meyer expansion fan
and we use "infinite" a few other times. But other articles, such as Mach wave itself, use the term as if it's a real thing, and correct me if I'm wrong, but can real things have infinite elements, I would not think so?
At Supersonic we have a picture with the caption
Would it not take infinite time for the cloud to form if it's being caused by an infinite number of waves?
All this is way above my pay grade, but I was confused, so if I am right, shouldn't we clarify that the term "Prandtl–Meyer expansion fan" is use for both a mathematical concept and a real thing that occurs sometimes when planess fly? Just saying. Herostratus (talk) 04:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparently this is a real physical thing that happens, so how can it have infinite parts?
Talk:Armorial of Spanish autonomous communities

message: The latest version showed the widely heraldic used at the English Wikipedia, please don´t revert. Earlier version didn´t show the official design in all cases. All the latest versions are right acording to sources. You can check all have the same elements comparing versions and you can check most of the earlier versions aren´t official at the sources. In addition, the earlier gallery had different designs so the final result is worse (I think It is easy to check, comparing the different version) (in heraldry is common that the Armorials show the same style, it is a basic rule). Finally There aren´t reasons for changes, and these designs are widely used at the Spanish Wikipedia, different designs should be showed, specially if this style is the used at the English Wikipedia Heraldic Galleries e.g. List of coats of arms of the United Kingdom Coat of arms of the United Kingdom List of coats of arms of France.
Please, not delete again don´t wars of edition, Solid arguments for latest version are showed
* if one user wants to rever please : use the dispute resolution guidelines.
--Galico (talk) 15:58, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I see only minor differences of style. Is there something substantive that I've overlooked? —Tamfang (talk) 02:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: On one side there is no convention or wikipedia policy that says you have to use a particular style.
Use gradients and two-tone breaks the rules of heraldry
The official designs are more intervals are illustrative and design rules well defined.
It is essential to use reliable sources on wikipedia and provide accurate information.--Miguillen (talk) 16:13, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Armorials design at the English Wikipedia
Talk:Henry V, Count of Luxembourg

message: Just to explain my edits.
I added the counties of Laroche and Arlon to the list of his fiefs. Though it should be noted that Arlon was known as both a marquisat and county, but for simplicity I just added it as a county.
I also moved Henry from the list of legitimate children to a separate list. If necessary I will add the two other known bastards at a later time, though only one more is remotly notable (for being one of the four brothers who died at Worringen).--80.90.53.6 (talk) 12:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  my recent edits
Talk:Bile duct

message: NOT REALLY
I believe the cystic duct is removed in cholecystectomy. The other bile ducts remain. Bile is still produced by the liver and will still be released through the major papillae into the duodenum, but it will not be in the concentrated form. --Eikenhein (talk) 23:49, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Locked bile duct with gallstone 49.183.77.106 (talk) 01:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blocked bile duct with gallstone
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga/Userbox/User Macross

message: I started this template page. In my opinion, the color scheme is poor, and the icon/photo could be improved, so if anyone here thinks they have a better scheme, please feel free to edit this template. I would be very happy to see a better one in use. Siyavash 18:14, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to say, but I've replaced the pic with an "M." Screencaps are not allowed in userboxes, as well as other fair use images. - 上村七美 | talk 02:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help requested
Talk:Coat of arms of Bolívar State

message: This article is a direct translation of the same entry in Spanish. Unfortunately, there are no references listed there either. Mcgowanlianna (talk) 20:31, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Star number

message: Result: Yes to all 9 proposed mergers. PrimeHunter 00:27, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I say yes to all of the mergers listed above. Bubba73 (talk), 20:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

text: You can choose which mergers to express an opinion about. I interprete an unmentioned article as no opinion on that article. It's 9 individual proposals with possibility of different votes and results, but I think the proposed mergers are too simple and similar to use 9 different talk pages for 9 separate discussions, many of them about 2-line stubs. PrimeHunter 00:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think Fibonacci prime should be done too.  Bubba73 (talk), 02:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think Fibonacci prime is too different to discuss with the 9 "x prime" stubs here. It's longer than all 9, and Fibonacci number is already very long. And there is a whole category  with Fibonaccci articles, so collecting all Fibonacci information in one article is not an option. If you want to propose a merger officially then I suggest you do it at the corresponding Fibonacci articles and not here. PrimeHunter 03:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, I don't want to formally propose a merger for Fib primes.  Looking at the article and especially the category of Fib articles, I agree with your reasoning.  Bubba73 (talk), 03:40, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple merge proposals of "x prime" into "x number"

message: I am guessing this article could use a graphical representation of a few of those star numbers represented in a figure form? Would I be correct? -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. (talk) 04:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, pictures would be nice. Can you make something good looking, for example building it with individual dots based on the source at Centered hexagonal number? There are pictures at http://www.biblewheel.com/GR/GR_Figurate.asp#star but they are probably copyrighted. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:19, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it. PrimeHunter (talk) 19:59, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice picture! Did you make it? - DavidWBrooks (talk) 22:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, by starting with the source of Centered hexagonal number which somebody else made. Maybe I should have mentioned that in the edit summary for GFDL reasons. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:31, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture/diagram 
Talk:True Vine

message: Catholic Encyclopedia: Parables:
"There are no parables in St. John's Gospel."
Raymond Brown's Into to the NT "In the narrative sequence the metaphorical discourse on the good shepherd (10:1-21), although it has a certain autonomy, is directed to the Pharisees whom Jesus accused of being blind in 9:40-41. This and the description of the vine in 15"1-17 are the closest that John comes to the parables so common in the Synoptics. In John there is a mixture of metaphors offering different ways of looking at the same reality: Jesus is the gate by which the shepherd goes to the sheep, and by which the sheep come into the fold and go out to masturel and Jesus is the model shepherd who both knows his sheep by name and is willing to lay down his life for them." p.348 and he cites a work called "The Shepherd Discourse of John 10 and Its Context". Then on pages 364-5 "A comparison of the Fouth Gospel to the first three Gospels shows obvious differences. Peculiarities of John include: ... long discoursed and dialogues rather than parables". And Ehrman's NT "In John, however, Jesus does not speak in parables, nor does he proclaim the imminent appearance of the kingdom. He instead focuses his words on identifying himself as the one sent from God." p. 162
:Simply search Parable of the Vine in any search engine and you will find tons of sites that classify this as a parable.  Do you know what the majority of bible scholars classify it as? Roy Brumback 06:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Parable status
Talk:Herbert Erhardt

message: His name was Erhard, not Erhardt:
http://www.nz-online.de/artikel.asp?art=1255196&kat=32&man=4
http://traueranzeigen.nordbayern.de/detail.html?&aid=3134216
http://www.greuther-fuerth.de/v3/aktuelles/news.php?abteilung=12
Kleeblatt (talk) 11:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Then we should maybe move the article. The kicker lists him also under "Erhard", but on fussballdaten he is known as "Erhardt" --Jaellee (talk) 17:37, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct name
Talk:Sun Tzu (mathematician)

message: Could someone add his chinese name in chinese characters?  --71.107.217.63 22:18, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Han zi please

message: Nothing is known about this author, apart from the author name in the book, and it's unlikely that anything more will be discovered.  I would suggest that this topic would better be a redirection to The Mathematical Classic of Sun Zi and any extra material copied to that article. If nobody objects, I'll do this. Chris55 (talk) 10:08, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article worth having?
Talk:Irmgard Keun

message: Why was the internal link taken out and replaced with something that goes nowhere?  At least with the link I put in you would get to German Wiki, and then have it translated??Mwinog2777 (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The way you put it in, the reader had no way of knowing (s)he would end up in an article in a language (s)he might not be able to read. Not everyone is multilangual. Richard 08:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Tralow

message: — Assignment last updated by TheDrewth (talk) 21:45, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: German History, 1900-1945
Talk:Alleanza Nazzjonali Repubblikana

message: As far as I can see this party is far-right - shouldn't it be described as such? --SandyDancer 18:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. Good point. Perhaps it should be reworded to say they describe themselves as conservatives, but in the press they have been referred to as far right? --SandyDancer 10:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

text: That's certainly better. Drew88 17:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Uraniidae

message: I have just removed this part of the article:
"The sunset moth, Urania ripheus, is endemic to Madagascar and has been called, "the most beautiful insect in the world". Indeed, with its gold, green, pink, black and white coloration, it is lovely.  Sadly, this moth's habitat is being lost at an alarming rate. Over 80% of the rainforests of Madagascar have been destroyed from slash-and-burn agriculture and timber harvesting. Conservation efforts are underway to conserve the remaining forests, notably the Makira and Masoala forests in the Northeastern part of the island."
I think the information should go in the Madagascar, or Makira and Masoala forests. I have been largely editing Chrysiridia ripheus lately and have never found information on its status or its loss of habitat. (And I have checked the IUCN Red List). Basically I think it should have sources, and be divided in the proper articles. Also being careful for WP:POV: "the most beautiful insect in the world".Pro bug catcher 18:38, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed part of the article
Talk:Jonathan Troy

message: Deleted the following line on the basis of WP:NOR:
:Most of Abbey's characters are deeply flawed in some way, and yet there is usually something noble about them. You may disagree with the means of the Monkey Wrench Gang, but you understand the cause they're fighting for.
It seems to me to be a novel interpretation of Abbey's work, it's too general, and it's not even about the book at hand. Lowerarchy 18:39, 29 October 2006 (UTC)