lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pyramid Play

message: 1.  Oregon Agricultural College had changed its name to Oregon State Agricultural College in 1927.
2.  It appears that the Beavers first used the pyramid play against Wazzu two weeks before the Duck game.  It also appears that the Beavers used it in the Fordham game.
If you need cites, please ask for them.  If there is no debate, I will make the changes above.  Wilkyisdashiznit (talk) 19:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to make the changes.  You should always add citations, regardless if someone asks for them though.  Without them, someone could simply remove the information without needing to provide an explanation. VegaDark (talk) 19:14, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two problems 

message: Link number 5 is not redirecting to the correct place.  the correct place is this URL:
http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061122/NEWS/311229976&cid=sitesearch
Tazerdadog (talk) 03:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead link 

message: According to this video, Cumberland used a similar play successfully to block an extra point in a 222-0 loss to Georgia Tech.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milesman34 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1916 Cumberland vs. Georgia Tech
Talk:Joseph Schwab

message: Dates are wrong. At least the Crime Investigation Australia described that there were at least 5 days between the last killings and death of mr. Schwab.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.243.146.87 (talk) 20:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates are wrong 

message: I rewrote the article because a good portion of it was copied/pasted from the PerthNow site. Some of the information was not provide in the cited sources or any other online source, so I removed it or added a  tag. I presume the names are provided in the Crime Investigation Australia episode. A fairly extensive online search found only a handful of reliable sources, most of which have the same information as PerthNow. To expand the article, someone will probably need to watch the CIA episode or access a copy of The Australian Book of True Crime, which apparently has a section on the Kimberley Killer. momoricks 09:45, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite/sources 
Wikipedia talk:Meetup/San Francisco 4

message: n.b.: the 2nd weekend of november was preliminarily decided on at the previous meetup, but I forgot that's a holiday weekend. So... 
let's take a vote. Leave your name under your preferred weekends:
* November 3rd (Saturday)
**Delirium
**Davecampbell
**MatthewEHarbowy
**Malpern
**MrRedwood
* November 10 (Saturday, weekend of Veteran's day) 
**Dan Spalding
**MatthewEHarbowy
**Delirium
**Sue Gardner
**Wintersweet
**MrRedwoodThere are too few long weekends to interrupt one...
**brion won't be in town for the other weekends :)
*SkierRMH - 17th is bad SkierRMH 03:12, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I will be in the area but unavailable until that evening (at least 6-ish).  On the off-chance that people can plan that far ahead, and let me know, I might swing by.  Dragons flight 01:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be easiest if you gave your phone number to someone to call you. No idea if we'll go on til 6p. -- phoebe/(talk)  22:58, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  That evening 

message: I can't be there; I'll be in the midwest this weekend. You folks have a great time! I look forward to seeing you all again at the next one. William Pietri 00:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drat!
Talk:You Don't Miss Your Water

message: Why is this section so detailed? Neither Bell’s version sees such treatment re: details, nor does the Triffid’s own page devote much more than a single line. I don’t mind this as I believe more info is better contrary to several Wikipedia policies. Regardless, if some reasoning were added here why the Triffid’s version deserves the exposure, then I can see that being helpful to understand why the detail lends an air of importance that is otherwise not supported currently. WPGuin (talk) 04:17, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I kind of agree. I think the text about the Triffids' version should be trimmed down and incorporated into the preceeding "Cover versions" sub-section. Lose the Infobox and release track listing too, as I don't see that it's notable enough to warrant those. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 17:52, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triffids version is excessive without rationale
Talk:Batang Kali massacre

message: I've removed the following sentence from the original article:
:Till today the British government has not made any official unreserved apology to the victims and family members that has been mistreated during the massacre.
I find this unecessarily POV, but I think we can reincorporate it into the document if we can answer the following issues:
* Who says that an apology it's deserved? When did they say it?
* Has the British government said anything about the incident, and any responses to groups demanding for an apology for the incident? — T-Boy: (complain bitterly) (laugh contemptuously) 08:30, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Petitiononline is not link worthy for a good reason, since they're hardly notable. The Star article is better, why don't you cite that properly in the article? Annie D (talk) 00:36, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: I've just made some edits for style and tense. I tried not to change meaning. I also started tagging unsourced comments but there is a lot things so I didn't want to cover the article in tags.
Can any one produce some sources? reports on investigation in 1949 or newspaper articles to firm up this article? Grible (talk) 21:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hi,

message: Seeing as there are still no sources for most of the articles content and any new edits seem to take the form of a list of fairly inflammatory or at least POV statements I'm going to risk my neck and tag the article for neutrality. Grible (talk) 20:10, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion

message: It would be nice to see some background about what lead to this incident. 
Kevink707 (talk) 02:43, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background?
Talk:Armenian Australians

message: Thank you to all who helped contribute to this page especially AraratNairi who i see have contributed alot, just a mention to all organisaitions such as Ararat Nairi, we need alot of help in getting some of the other pages such as Toumanian and Hamazkaine running and it would be great if you guys helped as i know you have alot of info in your archives. I will try to get other organisations "miootions" involved aswell.--Abb401 (talk) 11:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank you 

message: No notice was placed here that this image has been nominated for deletion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 23:15, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Other images used on this page may also have been nominated -- please check them all by clicking on them to see if there is a deletion notification on the image page.  If there is, use the link that takes you to "this image's entry" to comment on the nomination for deletion. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 01:10, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image nominated for deletion
Talk:Dynamic voltage scaling

message: ...but this does not follow from the equation (and the equation is correct). GregorB 23:00, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The equation is correct as is the conclusion. If P ~ V^2, then reducing V by a factor of 2 reduces P by a factor of 4 - one half squared is one fourth. Raul654 (talk) 06:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Voltage decreases quadratically with power consumption - halving the frequency reduces the power consumption by a factor of four."

message: As to the proposal to merge in undervolting and overvolting - I was also thinking that there are several overlapping articles here.  I was wondering about merging Dynamic voltage scaling into the CPU core voltage article.  Don't see that need separate articles for core voltage and changing core voltage.
As to the proposal of merging undervolting/overvolting.  Two details that ought to be dealt with.
1) As I understand it, undervolting and overvolting are often applied in a static, rather than dynamic sense.  So perhaps moving the article to Voltage scaling (or merging into CPU core voltage) as part of the merge would make sense.  (With appropriate coverage of dynamic scaling, static, etc.) 
2) Overvolting is applied to things other than processors.  (e.g. RAM, busses, northbridges.)  It may be that the same applies to undervolting, although it is not covered in the article.  As it stands, the Dynamic voltage scaling article does not appear to cover these usages.  Could voltage scaling be extended to cover voltage adjustments to other such systems?
If those two small matters can be dealt with, it seems reasonable to merge undervolting and overvolting into voltage scaling.  And possibly to merge voltage scaling into CPU core voltage as well. Zodon (talk) 04:58, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge in Undervolt/Overvolt 

message: 1. There is no need to have the same concept reapplied millions of times.  An example is in literary writings, there is no word bank as it is assumed that the reader(s) understand the vocabulary.
2. With Links, there is no need to have the audience copying and pasting the keyword into the search box.  If a person wishes to further understand the concept of Dynamic voltage scaling, they would just go into the section where the technology is listed as a device to, in my case, save power. 1oooop (talk)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.154.33.140 (talk) 06:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep as-is/ create a link in applicable fields

message: I think it would be rather useful to maybe list some different programs for different OS/platforms that are used to scale computer voltages.
For example there is: RMclock [Windows], CPUGenie [Windows], CoolBook [Mac OSX]
I'm sure there are more and it would be helpful if they could be compiled on this wiki.--Psychedelia (talk) 09:57, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programs that modify voltage
Talk:Simone Berardi

message: JoeNMLC (talk) 19:37, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphan article message
Talk:List of young adult fiction awards

message: I took the comment about the Horn Book Award directly from Boston_Globe-Horn_Book_Award. Perhaps a citation is also needed there. KennyLucius 23:06, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess. I've added one now. KMS 15:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: How frequently does any Boston Globe–Horn Book Award recognize a book for young adults? Not so often as the British Carnegie Medal (literary award), I feel sure. How does its history compare with the American Newbery Medal in this respect?
--P64 (talk) 17:13, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Boston Globe–Horn Book Award

message: It's basically a list of a fairly arbitary set. I propose we trim it down to those awards that have Wikipedia pages, or where the award-granting body does and the award is closely associated with them (eg the Bookseller award). That is conventional on list pages. Pinkbeast (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's this article for? 
Category talk:Afghan musicians

message: The propriety of renaming this category to :Category:Afghanistani musicians was discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 August 20#Category:Afghanistani musicians.  The result was that :Category:Afghan musicians was deemed to be the appropriate name for this category. --Bejnar 23:08, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming
Category talk:Afghan singers

message: The propriety of renaming this category to :Category:Afghanistani singers was discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 August 20#Category:Afghanistani singers.  The result was that :Category:Afghan singers was deemed to be the appropriate name for this category. --Bejnar 23:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming
Talk:Jeep trail

message: I've created this page as a place to move inappropriate material from the article on Jeeps themselves. I couldn't find any other article about off-road trails under any of several titles I tried, so I just called this one by the name used in the moved text. Perhaps the off-road experts can decide on a more appropriate title, if necessary. I'd also comment that "most famous" statement seems US-biased and is probably unsupportable in a global context. But I don't know enough about it, so have left it as written. -dmmaus 23:12, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Fantasma (Cornelius album)

message: Because of 153.160.234.106's question, I have come here to evaluate the conflict.
First: I am not familiar with music, so I have no bias towards either side coming in. My goal is simply to build towards an encyclopedia which is useful for our readers.
Regarding the most recent edit, I agree with the removal of citations, but I don't agree with the justification for it. WP:BLUE is an essay (see Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines), and is more addressed towards removal of common sense facts. The fact that someone is in a band is not common sense; being unfamiliar with music, I could not tell you whether that person is in that band. However, I do agree with the removal of citations because per WP:V:  (bold mine) Since the bands and people are notable enough to have their own Wikipedia page, one can go to the respective band or person's Wikipedia page to get sources for them being in the band. It is not necessary to cite it here. (If the band isn't documented in reliable sources, then you could not include information about it.)
As for 153.160.234.106's prior edits, I do not see the additional information around Sean O'Hagan being relevant to the article. If one does not know who Sean O'Hagan is, they can click the wikilink and find out; they do not need to know the band he's in or was in unless it's relevant to the article. Even if Microdisney's name originates from this album, it is trivia unless a reliable source covers it. E to the Pi times i (talk | contribs) 03:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: E to the Pi times i, thank you for taking the time to answer my question. I understand and won't restore the citations. 153.207.98.83 (talk) 08:46, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit war
Talk:Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers

message: Please change title of page to "Alliance of" rather than "Alliance for" as the incorrect version was a typo on my part. Thank you. Matt 23:17, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Someone vandalized this page (not me). See the remark regarding its President.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.164.26.82 (talk) 19:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Category talk:Afghan writers

message: The propriety of renaming categories from "Afghan" to "Afghanistani" was discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 July 27#Afghan people.  The result was that "Afghan" was deemed to be the appropriate adjective for this category. --Bejnar 23:21, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming

message: Rahimullah Basharat
Ian Cairns (talk) 11:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''R'''
Talk:Cyber Sunday (2007)

message: Yes Batista did do two Batista Bombs, but then went for a pin and Undertaker kicked out. Batista 1 Batista Bomb and then got the win . It should not say he pinned Undertaker after 2 Batista Bombs, it should say he won after a Batista Bomb. TJ Spyke 00:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This does not matter. It was still two consecutive finishers. Batista didn't win after one powerbomb, he won after TWO. --Maestro25 06:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I explained this on an IP's talkpage. I will use an analagy to make this simple. You know the 1UP trick in certain Mario games? If you jump on two enemies and then miss, the count is reset. The same thing happens here; when Batista went for the pinfall attempt, that "reset" it. He did NOT hit two consecutive Batista Bombs. He hit 1 went for a pin, then went for another Batista Bomb. TJ Spyke 06:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

text: But that's not accurate. The whole point is to list the move used to win the match. The first Batista Bomb did not do that since he went for a pinfall attempt and failed. If he had used the 2 Batista Bombs in a row, that would be different. TJ Spyke 00:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Because Rock did 3 Rock Bottoms in a row, he didn't go for pins in-between. Edge did, and has not been changed as well to say one. TJ Spyke 01:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Batista Bomb 

message: There are several issues that still need to be addressed before this article is ready to be a Good Article candidate. Please provide reliable third party sourcing (something other than WWE.com), add to the aftermath section, and wait for the article to stabilize. Once these concerns are addressed, please leave a note a WPT:PW that you feel the article is ready to be nominated. Wait one week for the members of the Wrestling WikiProject to help copyedit and look over the article. Then, if nobody opposes, the article can be nominated. Thanks. Nikki311 20:41, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of GA nominee

message: I've copyedited the article, but here are a few more suggestions:
*"He was not seen on WWE television since" - it isn't clear who.
*Another person needs to fix the writing, as I don't think it is up to GA standards. It is far too informal in some areas.
*The infobox image is not low resolution.
Hope that helps. Nikki311 03:45, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback 
Talk:Sex kitten

message: Is there a difference between a sex kitten and a sex symbol? 71.63.88.166 23:32, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. A sex symbol is media product. A sex kitten is a characterisation more likely to be attributed to a female than a male. A person may be either, both or neither. Cuddlyable3 (talk) 11:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Meah, Angela, Jenny Hockey, and Victoria Robinson. 2011. “I’m a Sex Kitten, Aren’t I…” 
Australian Feminist Studies 26 (67): 57-71. doi:10.1080/08164649.2010.546328.
Meah et. al studied the history of exploring one’s sexuality. They found that the “celebration of women’s sexuality” officially started in the 1960s and 70s (Meah et. al, 58). The three researchers emphasized that there were categories of women at this time who were coerced into obscuring their sexuality such as white and black working-class women and women with disabilities. In a study that took place between 2001-2003, Meah et. al studied the “making of heterosexual relationships among women and men in East Yorkshire in the United Kingdom” (Meah et. al, 60). One person in the sample, a sixty-year old woman, told Meah: “...could’ve just laid there an’ left it in all night… which I ‘ave done… I loved it in that bed with ‘im… I’m just a sex kitten aren’t I… I just loved to be near ‘im, you know.”
Grace, Kevin Michael. 1998. “Sex Kittens with Painted Claws.” Alberta Report/Newsmagazine 
25 (11): 41.
Kevin Michael Grace wrote about The Spice Girls and the beginning of “Girl Power” which was first coined by the girl group in 1996. It is believed that “sex kitten” is an umbrella term of “Girl Power.” Girl Power can be summarized by not letting people walk over you or other women, and fighting for gender equality. To endorse Girl Power is to support the feminist movement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mknealing (talk • contribs) 17:54, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annotated Bib Rough Draft
Talk:Callaloo (literary magazine)

message: — Assignment last updated by Jakealler (talk) 18:41, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: African American Literature I
Talk:Somatic cell count

message: Removed "This is known as 'pus'". Just look at the "pus" page and you'll see that they are not the same thing at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.234.157.23 (talk) 17:38, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Moonlight Agony

message: This article should not be deleted for two reasons.  As cited by your criteria for Notability(music) a band is notable if Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country, reported in reliable sources.  This criteria is met by looking at the band's official website, as shown below.  They have played in Denmark and Sweden as a part of a tour.  They also have played in the Gothenburg Metal Festival, which is a widely acknowledged music festival.  Also as a part of the criteria for Notable music they have released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels.  They meet this criteria by being signed by Massacre Records.  Massacre Records is a respectable record company based in Germany.  This record company is respectable because they have a plethora of musicians who have achieved worldwide success.  These artists include: Avian, Beyond Twilight, Edenbridge, Firewind, Human Fortress, King Diamond, Majesty, Metalium, Mystic Prophecy, Pyramaze, Savior Machine, Skyclad, Wizard, and many many more.  Also this record label is also an entry and having Moonlight Agony would fill one of the redded out bands on the list.  Hopefully, you are willing to reconsider deleting this band because they are notable and are one of the more influential progressive power metal.
:I suppose being signed to Massacre Records is an assertion of notability that is contained in the article. Please note that neither the band's official website nor MySpace is considered a reliable source. --Evb-wiki 00:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assertion of signifigance
Talk:Darius McCollum

message: Does anyone else think this article seems very biased?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.26.31.213 (talk) 23:15, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Darius was arrested recently after entering a closed off area at the 59th Street-Columbus Circle Station.http://www.newsday.com/news/local/newyork/ny-litran0615,0,4458847.story Transit worker impersonator arrested -- again Ken S. (talk) 03:07, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrested again 
Talk:Putrajaya Convention Centre

message: Even the signboards that points to the place uses PICC, and not PCC (i've never noticed PCC in use). The outskirts of Putrajaya is kinda 'next door' to where i am currently staying. I pass PICC about twice a week. Furthermore, PICC is much familiar with locals than PCC. So, which should it properly be referred to as? PICC or PCC? Kerina yin (talk) 19:51, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  PCC or PICC
Talk:Middle Ridge, Wisconsin

message: I just came to verify a Charlie Berens youtube comedy short, that's all 75.162.104.135 (talk) 22:23, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  One bar, one church, no houses?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry/Structure drawing workgroup/Archive Nov 2007

message: I'd like to join the structure workgroup.  (It's what I do for a living) 
What do I do next?  Tiptopper 02:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can put your name at . You can also take a look at  and give your comments. Other than that, you can take a look at  and see if you can help draw some of the images. Hope this helps. You might also want to drop by Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemistry and Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals and see if there is anything else which interests you. --Rifleman 82 05:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Joining
Talk:Squirrel (peanut butter)

message: My understanding is that in the 1970s, Squirrel was produced by Nabob Foods, a division of Vancouver-based food wholesaler Kelly, Douglas and Company (the majority of the company owned at the time by Loblaws/Weston).  Squirrel was one of many Nabob products that went to other companies (in this case, Best Foods) or went by the wayside when Nabob got sold off to a company focused on coffee production. 142.25.167.165 (talk) 03:56, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership of Squirrel Trademark