lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Budweiser Budvar

message: * Budwars Taste Contest with American Soccerfans during the Soccer Worldchampionship 2006 by Gemany's leading Newsmagazin. So funny!--Nemissimo 19:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Habe soeben gehört, dass die Budweiser Brauerei in České Budějovice verkauft werden soll.
Es ist -meiner Meinung nach- vollkomener Schwachsinn.
Wen man den wirtschaftlichen Informationen glauben darf, schreibt der Betrieb "schwarze Zahlen" ("ist Gesund").
Privatisierung (Ausverkauf staatlicher, funktionierender Betriebe um Kapital für den Staat zu beschaffen), damit Haushaltslöcher "gestopft werden können", hat in der BRD (siehe Post, Bahn, Kommunaldienste u.a. -frühere "Staatsbetriebe"-) zum Abbau von Arbeitsplätzen, Preissteigerungen und anderen negativen Konsequenzen geführt.
Investoren bzw. Käufer sind Gewinn- und nicht unbedingt Qualitätsorientiert.
In diesen Fall sehe ich die Gefahr, dass über kurz oder lang die Prodution in andere Länder verlagert wird, die billiger - nicht unbedingt besser - herstellen können.
Als passionierter Biergenieser fände ich es sehr bedauerlich.
Dies ist nur eine persöhnliche Sichtweise - Meinung - nicht eine Wirtschaftsanalyse eines "Biergeniessers".
F.Zboril —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.225.80.232 (talk) 18:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ausverkauf Budweisers 

message: I have changed the first paragraph and info-box of the article as they stated that Budweiser Budvar (a pilsner style beer) has been brewed since 1265, which is untrue (after all, the pilsner style wasn't even invented until 1842).  According to the brewery's website, the city has a brewing tradition going back to 1265, but this specific brewery was not opened until 1895, meaning that Budweiser could not be brewed until then (and also bringing it logically in line with the beer style). --MS
:Not quite. THIS Budweiser could not be brewed until then, but "Budweiser" in general could. As indicated, Budweiser simply means "from Budweis". --84.46.9.161 13:40, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading
Talk:Nondimensionalization

message: There is a mistake in the article. The Schrödinger equation with a harmonic potential (Quantum harmonic oscillator) is a differential equation.
Let's take
:\left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{d x^2} + \frac{1}{2}m \omega^2 x^2\right) \psi_1(x) = E \psi_1(x),
and
:\left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{d x^2} + \frac{1}{2}m \omega^2 x^2\right) \psi_2(x) = E \psi_2(x).
Thus, this is also a solution
:\left(-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \frac{d^2}{d x^2} + \frac{1}{2}m \omega^2 x^2\right) [\psi_1(x) + \psi_2(x)] = E [\psi_1(x) + \psi_2(x)].
I will move this to another section.Nicoguaro (talk) 17:21, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quantum harmonic oscillator is a linear equation 

message: The concept of nondimensionalization is not very well applied in the case of natural units system. If the speed of light is considered dimensionless then space and time have the same (natural) dimension.--5.2.200.163 (talk) 16:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nondimensionalization and natural units
Talk:Igor (given name)

message: Why on earth has all the stock character information been deleted???? Purple Rose
:Vandalism, I guess. I'll reinsert it.--Wiglaf 06:24, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: This page should describe the etymology of the name Igor, and perhaps give some further background into the name and famous people who held it. Information about the character has no place here. 
If someone considers it important, I created another article Fictional Character Igor.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.98.21.59 (talk • contribs) 15:59, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not reinsert the rest of the information 

message: Based on previous discussions on other names, I think removing the lists of people with a name is the minority opinion. See Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages)#Hndis needs its own Manual, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allen (surname), Talk:Jennifer. -- JHunterJ 12:02, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure that there is also a russian assasin known only as "Igor". I think it was the russian government that pointed the finger at him after being charged with the radiaion killing of a detective inquiring into the assassination of a spy (spy killed by radiation poisoning too). I dont know...I do some more reasearch. Check outAlexander Litvinenko for info.--Will James 23:40, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Including lists of people with the name Igor
Talk:Andrew Hunter (British politician)

message: I would contest that he is the first mainland MP to sit for a NI party. What about Enoch Powell? Matthew Platts 22:31, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Enoch Powell was elected for a constituency in Northern Ireland. Nicke Lilltroll 00:00, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  You're absolutely right. I lost control of my senses... for some reason I thought he defected while he was in his Wolverhampton seat. Thanks for pointing that out. Matthew Platts 00:13, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: I presume by mainland, you are referring to Continental Europe. England's on an island. --MacRusgail 05:49, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: T. P. O'Connor --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 12:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Qualitative organic analysis

message: From the outline here, to complete writing this article looks like an ambitious project. Furthermore, to really complete the article fully according to the outline, the article would become very long, practically like a book.  There are practical limits as to how long an article can be in Wikipedia - about 30 kB or less is desirable, although articles slightly longer can be tolerated.  My suggestions is to complete this article as a book having multiple chapters in Wikipedia's associated website Wikibooks.  This does not have to be done immediately, but as the article (book) length increases, the author(s) should ponder transferring it over to Wikibooks.  A summarized version could remain in Wikipedia as an article.  Then of course, a link should be placed in the Wikipedia article leading to the full book version in Wikibooks.  H Padleckas 22:44, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Blood and Chocolate (album)

message: Re: trivia section and Esperanto credits: 'vox kontinenta' is an electric organ, the Vox-brand "Continental" model. 'helpa baso' would translate as "Bass Help", and since the credit is for E.C. rather than Bruce Thomas, it probably refers to the fact that Elvis picked up the bass guitar for a few notes on this track. 
God, I need to get a life. --unsigned comment by 24.225.95.58 on 16:11, July 5 2006 (UTC)
:Me, too. Thanks. --Fantailfan 21:22, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

message: FYI: My original Vinyl Album came with extra Bonus Tracks on an 45 RPM Album 
Site 1: Tokyo Storm Warning - Parts 1 & 2
Site 2: Black sails in the Sunset
Might be worthwhile to know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bartjimmom (talk • contribs) 19:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  45 RPM Bonus Album
Talk:Chariclo

message: Either I'm very confused or this article still is (it was originally one figure and now its two). To me it seems to be a conflation of three different figures called Chariclo (see http://www.theoi.com/Encyc_C.html#C which lists two and http://www.csulb.edu/~dbouvier/Entities/indexC.html which lists three). The Lesser Merlin (talk) 13:00, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion
Talk:South African Breweries

message: This page is seriously out of date and needs updating.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.43.81.230 (talk) 02:05, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update required urgently 

message: Has the time not come to rewrite this article and clarify the distinction between the parent company and the Hub/subsidiary. Much has changed since the early days of expansion, and as although there is still much loyalty to the origins of SABMiller, SAB is now but a cog in a much bigger machine. 
The corporate function now operates out of London, and if anything this article confuses this fact by making it sound like the centre is still in Johannesburg. Andbrew.downes (talk) 20:28, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Differentiate between South African Breweries and [[SABMiller]]

message: I had to figure out what a 'metal crown' was; FYI, in US, we call those 'bottle caps'! You might want to add 'bottle caps' in parenthesis.
71.139.160.146 (talk) 14:37, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metal crown???
Talk:The Black Maria

message: So, I thought I'd mention that The Black Maria's listed website here at Wikipedia is yet another dead-linked-of-an-obscure-band-website deal. The link maps to one of the oddest ad-portal websites I've ever seen. So I'm doing some research right now into what the actual site may be, and I've found that the link on MySpace is the same, and therefore also dead. The same goes for their page on Victory Records.
I'm really not sure what to do with it, but on Lifetime's page, which had a similar problem, I just removed the link and replaced it with a link to their MySpace account. So I'll do that again, feel free to revert if you want, or find something better. I'll also add a link to the Victory page to the External Links section.
Additionally, the website website that claims to have features from the band apparently requires a password to access, so I'm removing it too. I can't find anything on what Tongues of Destruction is, but did find some subdomain sites of it that are totally unrelated to The Black Maria. So bubye link.
This great band's page is in desperate need of some attention, but it's four AM right now and I just don't think I'm up to it. So into the bookmarks you go!
No one's listening to me....
Joe5150 (talk) 08:59, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website issues...
Talk:Band of Gypsys

message: : There have been several attempts to tone down the harsh wording of the "Critical reception" section. The way the critic's opinions have been presented doesn't match their ratings, giving the reader a confusing picture. Also, it contrasts sharply with the "Influence" section, making the critics seem out of touch. Sometimes there are attempts to titillate readers (usually through controversy) without imparting any real insight; why is it necessary to open with "Band of Gypsys has often been viewed as the least important album that Hendrix released when he was alive"? He only released four albums of new material and the review scores don't show that big of a spread (four stars versus five). The section should be rewritten for more balance. A better wording for the introduction might be "Band of Gypsys has been viewed by some rock critics less favorably than Hendrix's three studio albums with the Experience." —Ojorojo (talk) 16:20, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reception
Talk:Couldn't Stand the Weather

message: Perplexed by the "Background" section as it seems to be nearly identical to the "Background" section for the previous album "Texas Flood". Gwladys24 (talk) 17:33, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background (?) 
Talk:List of egg dishes

message: These are not "dishes" so much as basic preparation methods.--Ericjs (talk) 19:44, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: True enough, but useful to have for everyone.--DThomsen8 (talk) 23:34, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Plain egg dishes" 

message: I have moved some unsourced, unlinked entries from the article to this talk page, listed below. North America1000 06:53, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced content
Talk:The Guardian Legend

message: I'm going to give it a shot and nominating this for FA as-is. We got nothing to lose, here. MuZemike 18:39, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. I had assumed this was already going on behind the scenes but was caught up in some super long FAC process delay. I hope the article length isn't too short. AMHR285 (talk) 01:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there are shorter FAs than TGL, not to mention shorter VG articles than this. I am banking on that the quality makes up for the quantity. MuZemike 02:26, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FA

message: Differences between the English and Japanese version of the game, or is that Trivia? JasonHockeyGuy (talk) 23:55, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of that information would not be able to be backed by reliable secondary sources, so it would probably be considered excessive information, i.e. trivia. MuZemike 23:59, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Id like to know about this article 

message: It is now apparent that The Guardian Legend was not promoted to Featured Article status. The article has been through several peer reviews, and extensive modifications were made on the FAC page.  What might give the article that extra nudge towards promotion? It is unlikely that much additional content will easily be discovered. Rg998 (talk) 04:59, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: First off, I was kind of surprised about the concerns regarding the prose, since that was driven into the ground in the peer reviews. Anyways, I'll write up a more-detailed post-FAC review tomorrow if I have time. MuZemike 06:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FA - Where do we go now?

message: The game was briefly mentioned in a recent Gamasutra article here from Mike Engler, designer of Retro Game Challenge as "one of the best NES games ever released". I don't know if that's worth another sentence in the "Reception" section or not. MuZemike 01:43, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New source 

message: If anyone cares, I am working on a version of this article for the Simple English Wikipedia. My draft can be found in my sandbox right here. MuZemike 21:04, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool AMHR285 (talk) 05:26, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simple English article 

message: Just found this blog entry today from someone on Hardcore Gaming 101, which mentioned the strong resemblance of the U.S. boxart to the poster for the 1985 film Creature. I don't think we can use this as a reliable source to verify the connection, but it is interesting to say the least. It also mentions something about the European boxart may have been done by Hajime Sorayama, but that was not verified at all. –MuZemike 03:33, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting connection with the U.S. boxart and possible info on European boxart 

message: Can someone please explain why the full title isn't being used? It should read, Guardic Gaiden: Legend of Goardic. I tried adding it bt it was reverted on a claim of good faith. 108.57.87.25 (talk) 04:14, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Japanese title
Talk:The Skin of Our Teeth

message: ----
I cleaned up the formatting of the Overview a little bit, and wrote what I think the original author meant to write.  Can't elucidate or elaborate any further because I've never read the play itself, if anyone has, and could add to this, it'd be great.
-kobayashi
I removed a spammy section in Notable Productions with a reference that didn't lead to proof of the production, or to anything relevant.
73mmmm (talk) 09:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/April 15, 2005

message: This looked a bit unwikified, so I linked some terms in the first paragraph of the parent article. Can that compared before this goes on the front page? Jonathunder 01:01, 2005 Apr 11 (UTC)
Typo in the image label, I think... "botton" -> "bottom", unable to change as page protected --Dan Huby 12:54, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Julien Offray de La Mettrie

message: This is an informative article; however, the actual eulogy written by Frederick the Great about La Mattrie would be helpful, in English or the original language (whether it is German or French I don't know).
:I found a used copy of F.A. Lange's Geschichte des Materialismus (History of Materialism). It contained Frederick the Great's funeral oration. As a result, I created the "Death" section and related the story of La Mettrie's unfortunate over-indulgence.Lestrade 15:14, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, I am editing this page for an assignment in my History of Psychology class. Please look over my edit and let me know what you think. I am open to suggestions. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Psychetudiante (talk • contribs) 01:12, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition/Changes 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 09:17, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 

message: The text said, without citing a reference, that La Mettrie was a "mechanistic materialist." A contrary view is cited in Skrbina, David. Panpsychism in the West. rev ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2017, p123:
"To him, mind was a very real entity, and clearly it was embedded
in a material cosmos. An obvious solution, therefore, was to see matter
itself as inherently dynamic, capable of feeling, even intelligent. Motion
and mind derive from some inherent powers of life or sentience that dwell
in matter itself or in the organizational properties of matter. That view,
sometimes called vitalistic materialism, is the one that LaMettrie—and later
Diderot—adopted.2
Commentators often portray LaMettrie as a mechanist because it is
assumed that anyone who denies the spiritual realm must see all things,
and in particular all living things, as products of dead matter. It is quite
common, even today, to equate materialism with mechanism. But, as has
been noted, the two are logically independent. ...Though he obviously
adopted the term ‘machine’ in his L’Homme Machine, it was in a specifically
vitalistic sense."
I suggest replacing the statement about "mechanistic materialist" with one about "vitalistic materialism", with a short quote from Skrbina in a footnote. What do others think? 
Gerry1998 (talk) 06:41, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philosophy
Talk:Full Sail Brewing Company

message: The stat about their annual volume come from the following line on their website:
"On an average day we bottle approximately 250,000 bottles of beer or about 10,000 cases"
Assuming they truly mean an average day, and using a standard 12 oz. bottle, I calculate it as somewhere in the neighborhood of 275,000 barrels a year.  --Sean κ. ⇔ 01:51, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm.. that can't be right.  I suppose they only operate 5/7 days of the year.  Still... their claim can't be true.  Perhaps they meant 25,000 bottles of beer a day? --Sean κ. ⇔ 04:43, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Annual volume

message: From the article:
:...first commercially successful craft brewery to bottle beer in the Pacific Northwest for retail sale...
Uh... Pretty much however you want to define "commercial", "success", "craft", "bottle", "Pacific Northwest", or "retail", Widmer beat Full Sail to the punch.  Look, I like Full Sail more than Widmer, but this claim is just wrong. 71.193.198.115 (talk) 05:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "First Commercially successful" claim? 
Talk:Supplee's paradox

message: I extensively rewrote the early May 2005 version of this article and briefly monitored it for bad edits, but I am leaving the WP and am now abandoning this article to its fate.
Just wanted to provide notice that I am only responsible (in part) for the last version I edited;  see User:Hillman/Archive.  I emphatically do not vouch for anything you might see in more recent versions, although I hope for the best.  "Paradoxes" tend to controversial topics which attract the attention of many anti-relativity cranks.  For example, I believe that recent versions of related articles Ehrenfest paradox and Bell's spaceship paradox are far less accurate and far more misleading than my earlier versions.  Thus, I'd advise caution in evaluating anything you read at WP on this or other topics.  Similarly for websites found by following links from this article, which may be cranky.  Any of these sources may attempt to describe fringe science or pseudoscience as belonging to the canon of well-established mainstream scientific belief, which would be very misleading.  More generally, strong comments like "the full resolution was provided" above may be overstated and should not be accepted without careful checking--- if one has the mathematical ability and physical background.  For other readers, I can offer no advice, since this interesting topic is probably too recent and obscure for Brittanica or other peer reviewed encyclopedias.  
One of the most valuable services a general encyclopedia can offer to general readers is that a good encyclopedia is very far from being merely a disorganized and unevaluated collection of claims and other information/misinformation/disinformation.  Rather, the editors have sorted the wheat from the chaff and have carefully and professional checked each other's work to remove bias and inaccuracy.  According to the philosophy of wikis, the same thing happens here, but my experience in my year at WP suggests that this is gravely misleading.  For one thing, in highly technical subjects, only editors with strong technical background and mathematical ability are likely to be able to assess competing claims accurately and fairly.
Good luck to all students in your search for information, regardless!---CH 18:01, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Students beware

message: The section on the resolution of the paradox says that Vieira's results agree with previous results (i.e. the submarine sinks); however, it seems that the actual cited paper repeatedly argues that the submarine is able to maintain neutral buoyancy. Specifically, I think the gravitational force might be the same as previous results but the net force is not. I don't have the physics background to make sense of the equations so I don't feel confident enough to change the article, but I hope someone more knowledgeable can take a look... .froth. (talk) 01:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vieira agrees?
Talk:Born into brothels

message: Does anyone know what happened to the profits from the movie? They made a few mil, and I'm wondering if the makers are living it rich, or if it's being used to help Indians...
:They're paying tuition for the kids, are building a school for children of prostitutes in India, and started a foundation (see external link on page) Bruxism 04:17, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:List of United States Navy ghost fleets

message: This article should be consolidated with "Reserve Fleet". Leonard G. 02:33, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon further review RF isn't totally Navy. --J Clear 23:55, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Until 1969 or so, there was a MARAD Reserve Fleet in the Hudson River.  This should be added to this page, to allow linking from historical ship pages. --J Clear 13:53, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hudson
Talk:Reserve fleet

message: I deleted the reference incorrectly joining "bone yard" and "skeleton crew."  A boneyard is a place where equipment, vehicles, aircraft or vessels are stored while being cannibalized "to the bare bones" for parts to keep other equipment running. 68.178.65.194 22:58, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Boneyard

message: "Recycling is another option as in the case of the Ghost Fleet of San Francisco the boats of which are set to be stripped of their paint, cut into pieces before being recycled."
Err, scrapping is recycling. Solicitr (talk) 17:51, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  redundant?