Talk:USL League Two

message: They aren't relocating. 205.188.117.9 21:56, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nevada Wonderers

message: I am going to make templates for each division's stadiums in the PDL. ColumbusCrew29 19:20, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stadiums on PDL Teams 

message: I was wondering if we should start on the 2009 PDL (as well as the rest of the USL leagues') pages, as I've already got my tables set up, minus the New England Division.  With Cape Cod folding, are they going to move some teams over, split the teams up among other divisions, or just have them play as a 4-team division until Portland starts up in 2010? 
Mtndrums (talk) 08:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: USL haven't made the announcements for divisional alignments yet. There are likely to be a LOT of changes to the Northwest/Heartland setup especially, with the addition of the new teams in Kitsap and Victoria, plus the Texas division might be different with the addition of West Texas and Rio Grand Valley, so we don't know where the Utah teams or Mississippi Brilla are going. There's no harm in being prepared, but I think it would be better to wait until USL HQ announce the PDL alignments before we start putting the tables on there. I would hate for you to do all this work, and then have to re-do it later. --JonBroxton (talk) 22:46, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It actually wouldn't be too hard to adjust, it's merely a matter of moving the teams around to the correct division table. Mtndrums (talk) 00:59, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009 PDL page?

message: I've worked on standardizing the past PDL seasons as well as putting together pages for the missing seasons.  If someone can go through and make sure everything's consistent and acceptable (minus not having 2001 playoff brackets yet and 1999 not having a list of changes from the previous season).  If I need to add anything or make corrections please let me know.  Mtndrums (talk) 21:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll wander over and take a look... --JonBroxton (talk) 22:45, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  I know there's a few things missing, like playoff format explanations and the colors in the standings, but other than maybe referencing the page I can't think too much of anything else.  I was also wondering about using orange in the standings to denote a team that recieves a bye into the PDL Semifinals (sort of like on the '08 W-League page). Mtndrums (talk) 00:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, other than a few typos and things which I corrected, I think they look great. Excellent stuff. I agree that we should use the orange color in that way too. One thing I did notice - we have a lot of work to do to create pages for all those old defunct teams! Red link overload!! Hehe. --JonBroxton (talk) 02:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And we also need to take a look at the list of teams as well, there are some that aren't there, some that don't mention that they were (or are now) named differently.  It's definitely a work in progress, that's for sure.  I may give another season page or two a go before school starts back up Wednesday, but I think once I get my schedule settled down I'll be able to work on piecing everything together a bit more.  Mtndrums (talk) 03:30, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And one season left!  I'll tackle that either Sunday or Monday most likely, since things do kind of get hairy in the playoffs, I believe.  I've also started some missing team pages with whatever info I can find, though some of them are pretty sketchy info at best.  I've also went through and split the second Miami Tango from the Miami Strike Force/Breakers, since they are actually two separate teams. (the explanation's on the Tango page). Mtndrums (talk) 19:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous PDL/USISL Season pages

message: This section is getting ridiculously long. Is there some kind of more restrictive criteria that we can agree on that doesn't list over a hundred different players? Jay eyem (talk) 01:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Such a section is not appropriate for a league. It's barely appropriate for a team! It could be safely removed. No need to have a new article with the list either. There are categories that can cover the players. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:53, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Notable professional players" section 

message: US Soccer only recognizes 3 Divisions of soccer in the US - Division I, II, and III. If they have made any changes recently to give recognition to a 4th level, please provide a source with proof that there is 4th level before removing the word "effectively". Or add "unofficially". Thank you! --Trödel 12:48, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Tom Danson I would also encourage you to visit United States soccer league system#Men's league structure, where it shows that U.S. Soccer defines anything below level three as amateur without a specific level assigned. In addition us U.S. Soccer sickos that also follow the U.S. Open Cup, can see both NPSL and USL League Two fall under Local Qualifiers based on U.S. Soccer not recognizing any level below level III. Demt1298 (talk) 14:20, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No 4th Level League in the US