Talk:Danny Wicks

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Danny Wicks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130928204329/http://rleague.com/players/danny-wicks_1168/Stats/ to http://rleague.com/players/Danny-Wicks_1168/Stats/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:11, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Unless there's an actual reason for this illogical and WP:POINTy edit, it will be reverted to comply with the instructions at Template:Infobox rugby league biography. Cheers. – 2.O.Boxing 10:33, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I find it quite logical and do not read your links in the way that you are reading them. Remember I am not the one removing cited sources from reputable organisations.Fleets (talk) 10:55, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Per Template:Infobox rugby league biography the name parameter is to be used for , not nickname; his name is , not . The full name parameter is to be used for the .  is not different to . is not a valid reason for your edit. What is the reason for your edit? – 2.O.Boxing 11:20, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Is a nickname, not a name? A great many Australians are referred to by their nickname in commentary, by their teammates, by administrators and by fans. Given that you Daniel is too far a stretch for your imagination (he could be a she, and be a Danielle after all). I think that this is quite logical to go one way or the other, but to deny both seems a little personal.Fleets (talk) 11:28, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, his nickname is not his name. His nickname is his nickname and his name is his name. They're seperate. Hence the seperate parameters. Considering you haven't provided a source to state his given name is Daniel, I'm assuming there isn't any. That's not denying something, that's WP:BLP. His birth name could be Dane, Daniello, Danillo, Dannel, Dannell. Including Daniel without a source is a textbook case of WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH.Only two references have mention of the name . In all instances they're quotes from teammates. Every reference in the article (including the aforementioned ones) refer to him as Danny or Wicks throughout, demonstrating  is not a commonly used nickname (we follow what the majority of reliable sources publish, in all instances, not your WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH that everybody calls him ). The fact that the only mentions of  I can find are in quotes from friends, that would make it a MOS:BADNICK (not encyclopaedic). It's usage in the lead wouldn't be supported by the relevant MOS; It's usage in the infobox isn't supported by the relevant template guidance or the relevant infobox parameter; even a mere mention isn't supported by MOS:BADNICK. Do you have a compelling reason to go against the above? As of yet, I find  and  not applicable and nonsensical, respectively. – 2.O.Boxing 12:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox