Talk:Chicago Sun-Times

message: did a sun-times fanboy write this? my impression is it's not that well respected, relative to the trib
:Sounds like the text was taken from a press release or something. Better now? --Dhartung | Talk 18:22, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older comments 

message: Is there a difference? I don't know what an "urban tabloid" is, a compact is a tabloid sized paper of broadsheet quality. GracieLizzie 21:39, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Compact (newspaper)]] leads here, yet the article says urban [[tabloid]] 

message: The second to last paragraph ("The movie Continental Divide...") should be in a "Sun-Times in Popular Culture" section - 65.24.127.241 06:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  pop culture 

message: Shortly after the VT Massacre, the newspaper published an article, which contained incredibly detailed information on the identity of the gunman like the age, nationality, legal status, origin, port of entry, and date of entry. All the information later turned out to be totally wrong, not even remotely close to the truth. The reporter and the newspaper should have run a credibility check, to the standard journalism stands by, before publishing the article at such a sensitive time as the whole world is eager to learn. The more detailed and sensitive the report is, the more careful the newspaper should be. Failing to do this and to meet reader's expectation will ensure people's criticism on the quality of the report and the professionalism of the newspaper. 
This is the reason why people are critical of the newspaper on this particular incident. The criticism was written in a neutral, factual, and objective way and should be kept as is. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dongdongdog (talk • contribs).
*No, it was not.  It contained arguments and speculation that were unsupported by any published sources.  That is forbidden here.  See our Wikipedia:No original research policy.  If you want to present your own new arguments on this subject, a tertiary source such as Wikipedia is not the place. This is an encyclopaedia, not a soapbox. Uncle G 23:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the newspaper is criticized

message: Like in many articles on media, there is a controversy section. The title of this section should be in this norm and be changed to controversy. The verbatim of "Erroneous Reporting of the Virginia Tech Massacre" is too specific as a section title. Dongdongdog 22:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is about that singular event; in addition, it still borders on violations of WP:POINT and WP:POV. I have reverted teh section back commensurately. And to be perfectly honest, it truly has no place in the article. I am leaving it in place pending the outcome of the AfD on the article on the VT reporting in and of itself. --Mhking 22:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is your personal view. Let's see what the arbitration board would say. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dongdongdog (talk • contribs) 23:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I have reverted to your version, but only to prevent my violation of WP:3RR (which you are currently in violation of). Please refrain from falling into edit wars. A violation of WP:3RR can result in a prohibition from editing on Wikipedia. --Mhking 23:16, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the section title to controversy 

message: I have requested comment from outside editors and/or administrators via a formal Request For Comment regarding the presence and structure of the VT content here. --Mhking 23:45, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am closing this RfC.  The controversial material has been removed entirely from the article at this point and it appears that there is no current disagreement over the version.  Douglasmtaylor T/C 22:20, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC

message: The following is unsourced information:
*To enable the construction of the Trump International Hotel and Tower, the newspaper moved to the Apparel Center expansion of the Merchandise Mart.
While this is interesting, we can't use it unless you provide a source. Also, none of this is really trivia, as trivia by its definition is "unimportant information" - it therefore shouldn't be in a trivia section but instead the information should be incorporated into the main article. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 03:46, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: There is no mention here of Jeremy Halbreich taking the Sun Times out of bankeuptcy and now heading the paper for the new owners.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.20.234.11 (talk) 22:07, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Jeremy Halbreich

message: isn't it noteworthy that the paper was featured prominently in the TV series "Early Edition"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.115.37.75 (talk) 11:45, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Edition 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Chicago Sun-Times. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111116040508/http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=ed061cd1-563f-446a-9f32-295bdac75759&k=72843 to http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=ed061cd1-563f-446a-9f32-295bdac75759&k=72843
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:42, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Chicago Sun-Times. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070223092324/http://www.thechicagofire.com/exoneration.php to http://www.thechicagofire.com/exoneration.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070916101255/http://chicago.about.com/cs/history/a/05_great_fire.htm to http://chicago.about.com/cs/history/a/05_great_fire.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930154810/http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2004/Jul04/Jul12/2_tues/news1tuesday.html to http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2004/Jul04/Jul12/2_tues/news1tuesday.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109003328/http://www.triblocal.com/elmhurst/community/galleries/2010/01/ichs-welcomes-pulitzer-prize-winner-jack-higgins/index.html to http://www.triblocal.com/elmhurst/community/galleries/2010/01/ichs-welcomes-pulitzer-prize-winner-jack-higgins/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Is the Michael Sacks mentioned here also this person? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Sacks
Dgndenver (talk) 03:54, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael Sacks 

message: On 6 October 2022, the newspaper announced that its digital content would be free: The Sun-Times’ new chapter: Our digital content is now free for everyone - Chicago Sun-Times (suntimes.com) chicago.suntimes.com/news/2022/10/6/23389729/paywall-sun-times-dropping-news-journalism-nykia-wright-jennifer-kho-celeste-lecompte2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:2C52:C3AF:FEAF:5B1F (talk) 19:40, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital