Talk:Beaujolais nouveau

message: Photos of empty bottles are scarcely pictures of this article's subject.91.125.30.12 20:56, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: pictures

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:30, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Is Tempranillo the correct description for the Spanish equivalent of "vino novello"?  The Wikipedia page on Tempranillo doesn't mention this.  81.107.46.107 (talk) 00:18, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tempranillo? 

message: Should this be included, then, in every non-survival-required export article in Wikipedia?  Why is notable?  Unless someone feels strongly that this section should remain, I am removing it, as somewhere there is someone who disapproves of every product there is. :)  sinneed (talk) 22:39, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh, the carbon footprint item is unique and the claim is well sourced. It's not like someone is boycotting the wine because it's crap. :p AgneCheese/Wine 04:23, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Exactly :) ... it has nothing to do with this wine specifically... if I get some fool to publish your name along with my call to refuse to hire you because your carbon footprint is too large, that might be newsworthy, but it certainly would not belong in a general-purpose encyclopedia entry about you... perhaps about carbon footprint or global warming hysteria, but it has nothing to do with you personally... you are just my target.  In actuality, this turns out not to be unique.
What if I move it to carbon footprint, under a new title "Protests against products" or similar?  It just really doesn't belong in a general entry about this particular wine.  sinneed (talk) 14:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Since the section had already been flagged for a bit, I went ahead with the move.  I will not protest an undo, but I feel strongly that this note does not belong in this article.  PERHAPS is belongs in another Wikipedia article, such as carbon footprint where I moved it.  sinneed (talk) 15:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

text: At present, the text is not notable here or at carbon footprint. First off, we have to consider that the only source we have for the "boycott" is the person who is calling for it to happen. While he appears to have credentials for assessing wine, as a primary source he cannot establish notability for his own event; that would have to come from other sources, such as news reports. The third-party coverage (or lack thereof, in this case) also trumps our own feelings as to whether or not an event is notable; it is not up to us to make such a call. As an analogy, I'd offer the case of how Wikipedia deals with fan petitions to bring back cancelled television series. The consensus has been that petitions are not notable (and thus not suitable for inclusion in articles about a series) without verifiable coverage in third-party sources. --Ckatzchatspy 21:33, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not really looking at it in the context of an "event" (i.e. boycott) but rather the unique, and notable, claim of Beaujolais Nouveau adverse effect on the environment via its unusually large carbon footprint. There is quite a bit of recent discussion on this, including a feature on The Today Show and other, independent reliable sources. AgneCheese/Wine 21:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: An image used in this article, File:2006 Beaujolais Nouveau.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 13 November 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:01, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:2006 Beaujolais Nouveau.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Substituted at 09:18, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment