lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gwyneth

message: Aww, I'm not on the list yet :)
Do I need more hits on the search engines? (Y: Yahoo; G: Google)
* Gwyneth Paltrow - Y: 42 million hits; G: almost 10 million hits
* Gwyneth Jones (both) - Y: 494 thousand; G: 106 thousand 
* Gwyneth Dunwoody - Y: 312 thousand; G: 55,200
* Gwyneth Herbert - Y: almost 100 thousand; G: 35,100
* Gwyneth Strong - Y: 68,400; G: 30,400
* Gwyneth Powell - Y: 14,600; G: 3,780
* Gwyneth Scally - Y: 3,500; G: 817
* Gwyneth Boodoo - Y: 708; G: 489
My poor little self - Y: 521,000; G: 31,400
So Yahoo ranks me better than Google :)
Nevermind. This was just a vanity comment really! :)
Oh, btw, alternate translations for "Gwyneth" include "white, fair, blessed" (from the root "gwyn").
Gwyneth Llewelyn (talk) 16:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Things like news articles about you are much more important than raw google hit counts, for getting into Wikipedia.  "Gwyneth+Llewelyn".  See WP:N Gigs (talk) 12:32, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Gigs is right, Gwyn: what counts is news articles, especially in traditional media. See Wikipedia:Notability (web), which requires "reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports." (I think "websites" was added to the list since I looked last.) Thus I was once thinking of writing a Wikipedia article about web personality Prokofy Neva, since he was mentioned several times in the written press. But why bother, since Prokofy hates Wikipedia, seeing it as another example of evil cyber-communism. I myself have the same problems with Wikipedia that you do: many of my articles (or rather, those of my Sock Puppet) have been erased or defaced, which is discouraging. But I understand both sides of the debate on Deletionism and inclusionism in Wikipedia (which is an updated version of the old fight between WikiReductionists and WikiConstructions on WikiWikiWeb, as described in History of wikis). The reductionist "WikiPolice" are useful in maintaining the standards and relevance of Wikipedia. I just personally have more important things to do than to fight with them all the time. - Danton Sideways (talk) 19:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, ok, that makes sense. Yes, I have just a mere 166 mentions on Google News; "my name in print" is not popular enough. Gwyneth Llewelyn (talk) 21:08, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:Gwyneth Llewelyn|Gwyneth Llewelyn]]
Talk:Octavo

message: Proposing moving this article to Octavo (text), to bring it in parallel with Folio (text) and Quarto (text) It was a dark and stormy night. (talk) 19:49, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me that "(book)" is more accurate than "(text)" as these terms relate to the size, or more technically perhaps, the format, of a book.  The "text" doesn't have any relevance to the format or size.  I would move all of 'em to ---(book).  Ecphora (talk) 21:41, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Or even better, to -----(printing).  Ecphora (talk) 22:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

text:  Should we move to Octavo, and move Octavo to Octavo (disambiguation) then?  There are only two other meanings at Octavo, and one of those is a red link.  It was a dark and stormy night. (talk) 18:29, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that is best here, though it might not work for Folio. Johnbod (talk) 18:31, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool!  If we have consensus then, I'll move it tomorrow.  (Agreed that this would not work for Folio or even for Quarto).  Thanks for your input.  It was a dark and stormy night. (talk) 21:42, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

text: Yes, especially since it has been moved before, doing it the WP:RM way is best. Johnbod (talk) 13:13, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: :Octavo (book) → Octavo — Per discussion above, let's move Octavo (book) and Octavo (text) to Octavo, since this is the only common usage of the term.  Thanks! It was a dark and stormy night. (talk) 20:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: * - Tiptoety talk 21:05, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: By the way, the link in the first footnote doesn't work. Is 8MO really used, or is it a false analogy from 16mo? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You're correct; "8MO" is not used.  There also are other problems in the article.  I just revised Book size and I'll try to clean this up next.  Ecphora (talk) 22:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've revised the article. Among other things, I have corrected the statement that Aldus created the octavo. Ecphora (talk) 03:12, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnote
Talk:Götz

message: The Götz doll company (Götz Puppenmanufaktur) is a major manufacturer of dolls for children ("play dolls") and collectors ("artist dolls"). It doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere in English Wikipedia, but it's certainly notable enough to potentially rate an article. --Thnidu (talk) 01:21, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doll company
Talk:List of cartoons featuring Elmer Fudd

message: Besides those noted, are any other of Elmer's appearances non-Bugs and non-Daffy cartoons?
207.31.229.4 14:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and funny you should ask, as I came here to make a request about one, possibly two, such 'toons not listed. In the years just after Arthur Q. Bryan's death, WB released at least one and I feel very confident two shorts in which Fudd had no voice at all, and the one I remember clearly--except for title--had no other regular LT character. He is a farmer, albeit dressed in his famous hunting outfit, trying to keep two Mexican-accented crows (sorry, but that's the fact of this cartoon) out of his cornfield. If I had access to a copy of Jerry Beck and Will Friedwald's comprehensive, film-by-film book on the MM/LT cartoons, I could ID that one, and probably find the other. Unfortunately, I don't. If somebody does, I'm sure they could find at least the one I described with relatively little effort. Please! Ted Watson 20:36, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Check also "Rookie Revue", a Freleng short from 1941 ...a private who resembles Elmer appears. He has a reddish nose as well, much like His "A Wild Hare" design.   He never speaks, though, so I can't be certain it's he.   --The_Iconoclast (talk) 02:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-Bugs-or-Daffy Cartoons

message: Anybody know just how to correct that typo--"cartoon" should be "Cartoons" (note both capitalization and plurality)? With this being an article's discussion board, and that being an incorrect rendition of the article's title, I'm really worried that I'd screw up something if I just moved it, as I did with "Doctor Charles Henry Moffett" to the correct "...Moffet" (that article itself concedes that the first was an error on the Airwolf title makers' part; I see that somebody has fixed it: many thanks to whomever!). Help! Ted Watson (talk) 19:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: - I have corrected this now. Keith D (talk) 00:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo in this page's title
Talk:The Piranhas

message: Drummer "Dick Slexia" is now a painter and decorator. He repainted my windows a couple of years ago. Jooler (talk) 00:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: FYI

message: I am sure I recall the Pirahnas' drummer using stuffed or plastic fish instead of drumsticks during a Top of The Pops performance. If this can be verified it would be a nice addition to the article as the BBC were very strict about trying to stop anything that showed the show was mimed. Stub Mandrel (talk) 20:52, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Fish?
Talk:Friedrich (novel)

message: The sentences "Though the story is told by his non-Jewish friend (Hans Peter Richter or the narrator), Friedrich is the protagonist. We can assume he is Hans Peter Richter." either do not make it clear whether Richter is the narrator or Friedrich is or make the reader assume Richter is Friedrich. To clarify this, I have changed it to "We can assume the narrator is Hans Peter Richter," though this may not be correct if Richter is portrayed as Friedrich.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.27.252.150 (talk) 02:43, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Hans Peter Richter the narrator
Talk:Baron Swaythling

message: Is there an heir to this peerage? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.173.162.248 (talk • contribs) 15:32 BST, 6 July 2007
:The current Baron, (Charles Edgar Samuel Montagu, 5th Baron Swaythling) married Hon Angela Rawlinson in 1996, but I can find no record of them having had children yet.  The Baron does have two sisters, though, one older (Fiona Yvonne Montagu) and one younger (Nicole Mary Montagu).  Presumably, then, Fiona is the heir.  Hope this helps,  Waggers 14:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Heir
Talk:Palmer House (Dayton, Oregon)

message: Per http://egov.oregon.gov/OPRD/HCD/SHPO/survey.shtml there is a list of sorts (not sure there is an official "state register" designation) but it isn't online. I work nearby, I could see how much of a hassle it is to do research there. Katr67 (talk) 20:27, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Oregon Historic Inventory
Talk:Salad (band)

message: some of this text looks very much like what can be read on allmusic. rewrite needed?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.224.148.35 (talk • contribs) 6 July 2007
:You're right - it was a copyvio. Rewritten to resolve this. It wasn't one of Allmusic's better efforts anyway.--Michig (talk) 06:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Allmusic
Talk:Chervyen

message: The article includes link to Radzima.org where Memory place of the kill of citizenry from Belarus, Poland and Lithuania by communists.  unsourced "massacre talk" according to Ghirlandajo. Xx236 14:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

message: By BGN/PCGN romanization of Belarusian at the end of the word an apostrophe should be. I'll correct. Ang15 (talk) 19:49, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cherven or Cherven’ 
Talk:Zhang-Zhung language

message: The main Zhang Zhung article itself notes in the Modern-day Zhang Zhung speakers section that there are still some people that speak this language.  Either that article or this one is incorrect; since the Zhang Zhung article is more specific, I'm inclined to think that it's this article about the language that is mistaken.  
Cheers, Erik Anderson 15:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that article says that it is unknown whether the language spoken in the Sutlej Valley is the same language spoken by the ancient Zhang Zhung people. The subject of this article is presumably the latter.—Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 16:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

text: The subject of this article is indeed the ancient, extinct language. There is some research that suggests that there is a quite close relationship between some modern languages spoken in the Sutlej valley and the ancient language, but the exact nature of that relationship has not yet been determined. At any rate, from the limited vocabularies of the modern languages that I have seen it is clear that the ancient language is in many respects quite different from any living language. BabelStone (talk) 11:39, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not extinct? 

message: The redirect Zhang-Zhung has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  1234qwer1234qwer4 15:41, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Zhang-Zhung]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:List of steam frigates of France

message: Christophe Colomb is not French! He was born in Genoa in Italy and lived in Spain.
: The article does not claim that he was French. Nevertheless, the French Navy named this steam frigate after him, as the article correctly lists. Rif Winfield (talk) 15:42, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Christophe Colomb

message: There are many links in this list that link up with pages that have nothing to do with the ship. i.e. Asmodée 16 (1841) Labrador 14 (1842) Cacique 14 (1843)Canada 14 (1843) Albatross 14 (1844) Mogador 8 (1848) -- to name more than a few. This is the 'talk page of the user' responsible. -- Need to test links when they are created.  -- Gwillhickers (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Link errors
Talk:Past Tense (disambiguation)

message: Hi guys .. I Wanna know how many tenses are there and plz give some examples /. ?
christina aguilera is very awesome just like her "HOTSICOPCUWESHATOSERPITER SISTER" !!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.161.136.45 (talk) 13:20, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plz Help me fast
Talk:John Wenham

message: The expression "a defender of Biblical inerrancy, but one who held to the position of "conditional immortality"" tends to give an impression that the view of the Bible is unconditional immortality, which is the very doctrine that conditionalists are in the process of refuting by the Bible (contrasting it with classical, that is, Platonic or Aristotelian theism). Using the conjunction "and" instead of "but" would be more appropriate and neutral. 93.142.245.249 (talk) 11:00, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. StAnselm (talk) 20:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Robert Hugh Benson

message: Deserves a mention, doesn't it?
More Light, Here and Hereafter, More About Life in the World Unseen, and Facts all deserves mention too.--DnivyØ (talk) 19:21, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Life in the World Unseen

message: He died at a pretty early age. The cause/occasion of death should be given note, I believe. KBurchfiel (talk) 04:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for early death?

message: The footnote 3 insinuation that Fr. Benson was a sodomite is nauseating. This "evidence" is flimsy at best and should thus be removed. It's the kind of thing that gives Wikipedia its bad reputation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.115.247.102 (talk) 07:01, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sodomite Calumny  

message: Is there a good reason to have doubles of so many gallery images? Understand they are from the same photograph & studio, & then as line reproductions in a relevant book, but is it worth just keeping singles with note that they also appear as line illustrations in a publication? I'd like to do it with a box for WP Commons for the surplus. Can someone give me the go-ahead? Thanks.  Manytexts (talk) 01:31, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery doubles
Talk:Eyragues

message: Eyragues is a quiet village 14 km south of Avignon and 6 km north of St. Rémy-de-Provence in the French Department of Bouches du Rhône.  A weekly market is held on Fridays in the large village square. Pubstr 20:22, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eyragues
Talk:Beer Can Museum

message: Is breweriana a real word?  It's very clunky.
*Yes, it is.  I'm as surprised as you.  Check out http://www.breweriana.com/ Jerry G. Sweeton Jr. 15:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Breweriana
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Systems/List of systems engineering books

message: Please think about this a little more--such lists have been uniformly deleted unless they have an explicit criterion for inclusion, and they are non-discriminate--you can not list all the books. For the sort of thing you have in mind, please see:
List of important publications in chemistry. DGG (talk) 19:04, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That list is an interesting example and maybe we can also make such a list of important publications in systems engineering. What we got here is an overview and this is for the common wikipedia reader maybe to hard to handel. or just not interested enough. Now this list does remain is of value for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Systems and Wikipedia:WikiProject Systems Engineering Initiative. Maybe it is a good idea to move this article and make it an project-article. - Mdd 22:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I moved the article for the reasons mentioned - Mdd 23:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first start
Talk:Lee Miglin

message: I am not sure whether the word "defeated" is sufficiently neutral/respectful given the nature of the death (it was the result of murder). 6 March 2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.81.170.169 (talk) 11:32, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is he actually notable outside of being a murder victim? Are there any sources that cover him outside of that context? If not, this article should probably be redirected to Andrew Cunanan. Robofish (talk) 20:39, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; I'm going to be bold and do it. GiantSnowman 16:00, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Butse Kik

message: I can't see this article getting much larger. Would it be better to merge it into Yoyoy Villame, and redirect Butse Kik there? Gordonofcartoon 15:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree on merging it with Yoyoy Villame because a character named "Butsekik" also appears in the short story, Ang Unang Baboy Sa Langit, by Rene O. Villanueva. Anti beast (talk) 01:47, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Klymentiy Sheptytsky

message: What does Mr Temerty's undoubtedly generous and meaningful donation have to do with Mr Sheptytsky? 2607:FEA8:FF01:47D8:989A:FB0B:2ACE:AD42 (talk) 19:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  legacy James Temerty
Talk:Welsh Highland Railway restoration

message: I've been using google book search to find some references for the main WHR article and found a mention of the WHR controversy in Making Histories in Transport Museums By Colin Divall & Andrew Scott which could provide some useful references to this article. --Zabdiel 13:09, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: The information as to the RhE income exceeding that on the FR in July 2011 was common knowledge around the Railway in August and was confirmed from reliable sources. No names given for obvious reasons. Pedr  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.194.124.11 (talk) 22:42, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: RhE Income - July 2011

message: The article makes claims about company law that appear to have no bearing to reality.
For example, the Companies Acts in force at the time allowed (as they still do) for any single member (shareholder) of a company to call an AGM if there are not sufficient directors within the UK to allow the directors to call an AGM (if there were sufficient directors, then the shareholders can require the directors to call the AGM).
Furthermore, that AGM can simply appoint new directors. It is not uncommon for companies to end up with no directors, and the law provides simple means to deal with this.
The register of members is merely a record, and is not definitive proof of share ownership. If the company were not complying with its obligation to maintain the register (because, say, it had no directors to be able to cause that to happen) then it would not 'invalidate' their ownership. Again, this is not a novel or uncommon situation.
Mauls (talk) 17:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious - Companies law 

message: The section on the FR and the structure of the company/trust/society is irrelevant to the restoration of the WHR and does not belong here.  The first two sentences do explain the early FR interest, the remaining paragraphs belong to the FR restoration page.
Guztaff (talk) 14:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove irrelevant sections
File talk:HA1cover.jpg

message: I have retagged this image as a magazine cover as there is no evidence that the copyright owner has released this image as was previously asserted.  In addition, I cannot find the image on the page it is purportedly from.  Finally, there is no Fair Use rationale for the image.  Unless a Fair Use rationale is added within one week, this image will be deleted. Argos'Dad 15:45, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can find the image at www.forum.antepithesh.net. The adminstrators of the site have released the image and encouragaged anyone to download it so that they can spread their propaganda. There is no copyright status for this image, and this is because the owners have released their rights on it. Mitsos 10:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am afraid, I can't find it on that website, and in any event, I can't see where there is a release on the webpage.  What you say makes logical sense, but that is not sufficient under U.S. copyright law.  So, can you please link to the exact spot in the webpage where you found this image and provide information that substantiates the release of copyright. Argos'Dad 13:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Would this image help you see another time when it appeared? It's taken from a nationalist Greek blog. The additional text on the image explains the similarities between the symbol then used by Golden Dawn & some weird mystical nazi splinter groups. Also, I have located it here. And also, here's another time this symbol was used, in a 1982 issue of Golden Dawn's magazine. It's part of this article in Greek, which documents the nazi roots of Golden Dawn. At any rate, I don't see any reasons why we should consider this picture should not be used in Wikipedia. It's posted strictly for people's information and education and the publication of the magazine was over 30 years ago. Also, Dear User:Argos'Dad, keep in mind that, in light of Golden Dawn's recent bravado-rich announcement, you'd be among their next targets (see your profile - you'll see why). In my view, the wise decision would be to keep the picture; and if you want, do get in touch with the bloggers of Jungle-Report for permission to use any image from their article, although I'm sure they wouldn't object at all. Moderatelyaverage (talk) 15:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:Bancroft, Ontario

message: I added the Canada/Ontario project tag, and have assigned a "Start" rating to the article because it is short on references/citations, but also because it currently doesn't talk about topics such as government, education, or recreation.  I think the "B" rating on the WikiProject Cities tag is premature.  PKT (talk) 03:52, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
MediaWiki talk:Revision-info-current

message: A discussion to standardise the styles for boxes of this kind has been started at Template talk:Fmbox#New type?.
--David Göthberg (talk) 12:47, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardised styles 

message: This is just to explain and document why and how I am doing this change. No action needed from anyone else.
I am planning to change the CSS ids used in MediaWiki:Revision-info and MediaWiki:Revision-info-current, to be in line with how we do for other such messages. For the full details about this see MediaWiki talk:Revision-info#CSS id change.
--David Göthberg (talk) 05:56, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSS id change 

message: To reflect changes to the software, please replace the page with the following:
Revision as of $1 by $2$7
Jackmcbarn (talk) 01:05, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, tested, working. --Redrose64 (talk) 08:21, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 13 June 2014 

message: A recent WP:VPT requested to have a noticeable difference when reaching the current version, I've move the template level from warning to system for this notice.  Obviously revert without discussion if something is now on fire. — xaosflux Talk 12:32, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a good change to me. Jackmcbarn (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  fmbox level 

message: I  the target page for the "permanent link" wikilink from Help:Diff to Help:Permanent link because it seems more appropriate. The link was originally made by  from 08:19, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed link to "Help:Permanent link" from "Help:Diff"