lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Australian people

message: Would it be possible for people adding articles to this category, to instead add them to the most suitable sub-category?  They can belong to more than one category, for example, Natasha Stott-Despoja may belong to :Category:Australian Democrats politicians and :Category:South Australian people.  Eventually this page will become unreadable due to the sheer number of names listed.  I'm under the impression that it will be possible to easily get a list of a category and all sub-categories, so having all the Australian people in different sub-categories won't be a problem.  Chuq 13:21, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments
Talk:National Bank Act

message: They are the same Act.—Markles 20:18, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from [[National Bank Act]]

message: Some banks were exempted from tax. what were they? and why the "dual banking system"? Did the tax caused the closure of some state banks? if yes, when did this happened? And then when did the state banks cameback with checking account with green back as reserves? Jackzhp 17:01, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The effect of the Act

message: If someone can find or put this on Wikisource it should probably be linked. --Emesee 05:13, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikisource

message: Elliit Spitzer cites role in promoting predatory lending in 2003: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021302783.html  valid? relevant? Mulp (talk) 00:42, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: role in 2008 crisis?

message: 1. The title of the article is singular, Act.  The 1st sentence announces the topic as plural, Acts.  Which is it?
2. The 1st sentence states the scope of the article as two acts, those of 1863 and 1864.  But section headings identify 3 or more acts—1863, 1864, and 1865–66.  Which is it?
3. The 3rd sentence of the article begins, "The Act …"  What Act?  No "act," singular, was named.
4. The title, section heading National Bank Act, and the 1863 … 1865-66 headings each say National Bank Acts.  The 1st sentence and section Legacy say National Banking Acts.  Which is it?
For Wikipedia to lack clarity on a point of detail is one thing; to be unable to even identify the topic is another.
Jimlue (talk) 23:15, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with some of these concerns. Other than changing the title, you can consider making other edits and see what others say. See WP:RM for changing title. Orientls (talk) 09:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Topic
Talk:My Pedagogic Creed

message: I removed the statement that "look-say" and "whole language" are the same.  They are not.  Joyous 14:13, Jun 8, 2004 (UTC)
*Why does it have the attention tag on it? It's just simply a stub. Celestianpower 18:43, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The lead section does not say anything about the content of the article. There should be a summery. I'm adding a maintenance template for that.  Liiiii (talk) 08:48, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Inadequate lead section
Talk:Squeegee man

message: # I have hardly been to a city in the world where these guys aren't operative.
# Some of them do actually wash your windows.
I am altering this page correspondingly. It is currently needlessly offensive (and therefore not objective)
:Agreed. Feel free to mention their diversification - you can often buy roses and newspapers from London squeegees. Pcb21| Pete 14:20, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: What does this article have to do with punk rock music? These squeegee people are apparently referred to as "punks" in some areas but I don't think that has anything to do with punk rock music. And even if some of them do listen to punk rock music we don't know that they all do, and that still isn't a good enough reason to group this article in with punk rock music. Anybody with me on this? -- OlEnglish (Talk) 22:41, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's part of the subculture.ScarTissueBloodBlister (talk) 02:38, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't buy it. 6 years without any words about punk rock or how it's a part of the subculture? I'm removing the Wikiproject from this talk page. (For posterity, it was ) If we want to make the case that it's got anything to do with punk rock, let's add a section and cite a source. Michael (talk) 20:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Punk rock? 

message: Relates to this posting at the Help Desk. SassyLilNugget (talk) 12:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Unexplained, Back & Forth Removal of Info from the Canada section 

message: The NYC section looks like it was written to advance Giuliani's reputation, despite the wording of the actual source material (only one item, by the way). --Orange Mike | Talk 13:42, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York section 

message: The source material cited in fact makes this point, directly opposite to what the article says. 24.44.252.192 (talk) 01:25, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  It was Mayor Dinkins, not Mayor Giuliani, who got rid of the squeegee men in NYC 

message: I read through it and it seems to adhere to it. If anyone has anything they would like to change don't hesitate to let me know here. Brettwardo (talk) 18:51, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it looks like the wrong tag is used. There's a lot of OR and unverified claims in that section, the only references are to what Giuliani did, but the bits about the MO of the Squeegee Men are unreferenced and maybe that was what was perceived as the bias that led to the NPOV tag? JesseRafe (talk) 18:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove npov warning
Talk:Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics

message: I merged Cree Syllabary and Inuktitut Syllabary and Inuktitut Writing for this article. "Canadian Syllabics" also points here. Carrier and Ojibwe syllabaries should be added to this page in due course. I will be putting in a Unicode table for Cree before too long. this was User:Evertype 14:17, 8 Jun 2004
:Can you put your signature there, please? Well, there probably should be some introduction, and a link to the page on unicode.org. 10:14, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Link from Unicode done. -- Pjacobi 10:46, 5 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: I noticed that this revision of the article
was replaced with a redirect to what is now Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics on November 2004. I hope the contents were appropriately merged where needed be.
Today, I changed the redirect to point to Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics character table, which lists Unicode information, since (AFAIK) "Unified Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics" is primarily a Unicode jargon, much like Unihan, etc. —Tokek 05:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article was replaced with a redirect
Talk:Interior decoration

message: It looks like it was once just one long article (no sections), but that someone came along and added a few sections at the end as an afterthought.  All this article needs is a bit of reorganization so that it either has sections or doesn't.
jbI think this article should be merged with Interior Design. There's a lot of overlap, and the distinction between "interior design" and "interior decoration" is a pretty controversial subject. Michael peng 17:40, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a mess... 

message: Kelly Wearster did not create Hollywood Regency, a style  from an era before she was born.  The whole paragraph sounds like original research from a fan, and needs citations.  The one reference is a dead link.66.61.26.164 (talk) 02:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Theme
Talk:Heck

message: This page was on Vfd a while ago, but when it got off, it wasn't taken care of. 66.32.129.167 14:34, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm redirecting this unsourced heap of unencyclopedic poo to Minced oath.--Tony SidawayTalk 13:50, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Be bold|Being bold]]

message: *Alfons Heck (1928-2005) German American human rights activist 
*Dieter Hecking (1964-)  German football player
*Don Heck (1929–1995) American comic book artist 
*Erich Hecke (1887–1947) German mathematician
*Heinz Heck (1894-1982) German biologist
*Joe Heck Nevada politician
*Ludwig George Heinrich Heck called Lutz Heck (1892-1983) German zoologist
*Peter Heck American science fiction author.
*Paul Heck (producer) (1967-)  American music producer 
*Richard F. Heck American chemist
*Rose Marie Heck (1932-) American politician
*Victor Heck (1967-) American editor and horror fiction author
*Preben Van Hecke (1982-) road bicycle racer
*Johan Van Hecke (1954-) Belgian politician
*Stefaan Van Hecke Belgian politician
*Parnall Heck was a 1930s British four-seat cabin monoplane
--Stone (talk) 20:53, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bein Bolder
Talk:Canadian poetry

message: "There are actually two quite distinct branches in Canadian poetry:"
isn't there any First Nations poetry? Rmhermen 14:43, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I have updated a few organizations and prizes and there is quite a large Native Canadian poetry scene in Canada,  WayneRay 20:04, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No it's not in the major league poetry prizes but Chapbooks are rarely recognized even by known authors. The SBCA is only for Chapbooks and as such has many notable poets as winners, therefore it was placed here for that reason. WayneRay 16:46, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions
Talk:Rand Miller

message: Even though this page is already a few paragraphs, it is rather incomplete and not yet well-structured, hence the "stub" mark. Just a clarification. Chucker 17:29, 2004 Jun 8 (UTC)
===Revelation===
I was under the impression that Rand did not play Atrus in Revelation.
--PlantPerson 15:12, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong impression. Rand has played Atrus in all games thus far (against his will, he apparently feels a real author should take the rôle). The two brothers were however played by different authors in Revelation: in the original Myst (and RealMYST) Rand also played Achenar. Jordi·✆ 16:19, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: I was under the impression that Rand did not play Atrus in Revelation.
--PlantPerson 15:12, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong impression. Rand has played Atrus in all games thus far (against his will, he apparently feels a real author should take the rôle). The two brothers were however played by different authors in Revelation: in the original Myst (and RealMYST) Rand also played Achenar. Jordi·✆ 16:19, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Revelation

message: I don't see why not?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetechwizard21 (talk • contribs) 03:10, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isnt Rand listed as an actor or performer?
Talk:Nothing So Strange

message: As of 22 November 2006, the film is not, as the article suggests, free to download. It is, however, available for a fee of $3 or $5 for the small and large versions respectively. --84.64.74.71 08:16, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability of Film 

message: * http://www.nothingsostrange.com is broken: only the Flash preview works.
* Flemming seems to have gone radio silent "for at least a year" as of August 21, 2008, http://www.slumdance.com/blogs/brian_flemming/ 
* http://thebeastmovie.com now redirects to http://danielle-movie.com and consists of several forums. 
Oh well. --Lexein (talk) 20:59, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website hackery or bitrot?
Talk:Ringtone

message: I miss a description of the decline of the ringtone market. The technical but also sociodemgraphic reasons. Theking2 (talk) 17:58, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decline 

message: @ 2409:4080:BD90:DAE3:34BB:697B:CFFD:9C3B (talk) 11:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Peaceray (talk) 15:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venil pickup call 

message: There was a story some years ago, about school kids using a ring tone at a high frequency that teachers couldn't hear, but they could hear. Can we include this? Gah4 (talk) 07:03, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find a good reliable source for it, maybe. But those frequencies are used for a lot of reasons; back in my highschool high-pitched noise was used to annoy other kids. I'm surprised I can't find an article on this general thing... ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 08:46, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  inaudible 

message: I have seen cases where people seem to have a ringtone for a specific person they know which is different from the normal ringtone, and that this can be done for any known caller (a different ringtone for each). I haven't found a good source yet but if there is one or more, it seems like a concept that should be in the article.
And I'm not certain of the terminology. It's not necessarily a ring. It can be any sound.— Vchimpanzee •  talk • contributions •  22:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See Distinctive ring Lexlex (talk) 15:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Sorry, what I am asking about is calls intended for the same person but coming from different callers. That article is abpout different rings intended for different people answering each call.— Vchimpanzee •  talk • contributions •  17:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different ringtones for known callers
Talk:Fluid bearing

message: Should Foil bearing be merged with this page?? Pud,  8 June 04, 12:18 PST
:This issue was previously discussed on the Foil bearing discussion Talk:Foil bearing.  I don't favor a merger, but if a merger were done there should be clear redirects and other ways to identify the distinctive foil bearings through the search engine here.  Sometimes things get submerged into subcategories of subcategories, and as a result it's very hard to find and even harder to provide a clear link to a relevant subcategory for readers.--Mack2 17:18, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that it should not be merged, both because of afforementioned issue with subcategories, and because I believe that foil bearings are different from fluid bearings. Even though foil bearings also use a fluid to support the weight, they are different in that they use thier own rotational speed to generate the pressure, rather than having the pressure supplied externally.
I am in favor of more seperate and smaller pages rather than huge pages.141.157.83.53 03:57, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

message: At the beginning of this article, it is stated that a hydrostatic bearing uses an external pressure pump.  Under "Journal Bearings", it is stated that the bearings used in petrol and diesel motors are hydrodynamic.  These motors use external pressure pumps to maintain fluid pressure.  The article contradicts itself.--69.122.62.231 (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydrostatic or Hydrodynamic 

message: :Michell's patent was granted in 1905, while Kingsbury's first patent attempt was 1907.
:The US didn't have a Patent Agreement with the UK (Michell would have been British) until 1906 and so any patent Michell made in 1905 would have held no validity in the US, as the US didn't recognise UK patents until after 1906.
:I suspect this may also have been the origin of the dispute between Joseph Swan and Thomas Edison over who invented the lightbulb.
:I remember what year the US finally agreed to an agreement with the UK as it was (no doubt coincidentally) the same year HMS Dreadnought was launched.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.112.75.43 (talk) 11:19, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patent 

message: I think it's a bit difficult to read and that more can be done with formatting to make it easier to understand. StainlessSteelScorpion (talk) 12:50, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation Section is poorly formatted
Category talk:Jewish mysticism

message: Someone with some knowledge of modern day Orthodox Judaism can confirm that mysticism has a much greater relevance to religious life than just being a subcategory of Jewish mythology. The two are wildly different from each other. Mysticism permeates many laws and customs, from the ritual handwashing upon awakening to the bedtime prayers (and everything in between). This has been raised  by User:IZAK before, and I believe that he has considered requesting arbitration on this.<BR>
Please discuss any planned changes here before making them. An edit war on this issue would be too ridiculous for words. JFW | T@lk 19:57, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Agent Cody Banks

message: I don't remember enough about the plot to present a summary.  Does anyone? -- Deane
Heh. I think I tried to forget it. Basically its about Cody Banks (no really). And he goes to CIA camp or something and ends up getting to be an agent. He says he's 'fast with the girls or something' but he's lying just to be in the CIA which is bad because his mission is to ask Hilary Duff's character (who sucked even more than usual in this movie, by the way) out on a date for some reason. I think it was because her father's boss is like evil and going to control everyone's minds and kill them. But it gets kind of fuzzy in my mind right there, Hope that jogs someones memory. --Teentitans! 01:41, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That was just odd.I'm making my own summary.Julz
Based on what I know of kids under 16, even my own memory of myself - no one would be able to keep being a spy a secret. Have you ever talked to kids? They talk on and on about random stuff that it would be 10 minutes before they get to "Guess what? I'm a spy. It's true ....". For the idea to work, this spy camp would have to be a week of training followed by 11 weeks of the kid tied to a chair and having a cattle prod used on them each time they mention something that relates to them being a spy. It's the only way to train them not to talk - otherwise the movie would need a scene in which the stupidity of the kid gets them captured and leads to a bloody over the top death. Abrynkus 20:24, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Did anyone else notice that near the end, the evil henchman's prison jacket reads "AK 1138?" Should this be put somewhere in this artical? (66.190.139.140 (talk) 02:29, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1138
Talk:Thomas Campion

message: The image I uploaded, campion.jpg, can be found on at least two websites. One of those is http://www.classical-composers.org/cgi-bin/ccd.cgi?comp=campion. And it was sent there by some guy named Egon Schroder. Please tell me what is wrong with this image. --Marcus2
:For one thing it's a caricature rather than a straight likeness, and therefore less suitable for an encyclopedia. For another, it is a much smaller and lower quality image than the one that was here before. For a third, it has no copyright details - judging from the style, I suspect it is a modern drawing and therefore in copyright, something which isn't the case with the other image. So the other image is preferable in every way. --Camembert
Okay, I think I get the point. But what do you mean by the old image being superior. --Marcus2
:I mean it's of a higher rank, of greater value, better (for the reasons given above). --Camembert
::Well, the image has been removed, because it was of Edmund Campion, so it wasn't of very good encyclopedic value after all. Mak (talk) 22:13, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The redirect When Laura smiles has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Onel5969 TT me 16:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:When Laura smiles]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect When Laura smiles has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  signed, Rosguill talk 16:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:When Laura smiles]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Gary Coleman

message: The version 21:28, 13 March 2020‎ Uncle Dick of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to expand an already existing article--Wing (talk) 11:52, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation into Chinese Wikipedia 

message: The cast photo with Nancy Reagan does not depict Coleman anywhere in the shot. I therefore question its suitability for this article in particular. Do we have better ones? Elizium23 (talk) 03:53, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It was immediately apparent to me as well that the subject of the article is nowhere to be seen in the photograph. What's worse is that a casual glance could allow the reader to assume erroneously that Coleman is the person in the left foreground since there is a vague similarity of age and appearance during the same relative era. Given these factors, I'm going to be bold and remove the photo. While the photo itself is great for nostalgia, it has no place here. It would be great for Todd Bridges, Conrad Bain or even Dana Plato (behind Bain). Maybe even Nancy Reagan?... nah. -- Srwalden (talk) 11:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The photo is still present in the article — not sure if it ever was removed. For clarity, I noted in the photo's caption that Coleman is not present. SteveChervitzTrutane (talk) 07:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast photo
Category talk:Geometry

message: What category to be exact do the polygons go?? 66.245.80.48 21:20, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it might go partly in discrete geometry... Also I think a subcategory like convexity or convex geometry is needed, where part of polygon's topics migth go 
 Tosha 21:48, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: What do you think of making subcategory like Classical geometry which would include
all kinds of geometry like
Euclidean affine hyperbolic projective...
[unsigned] (by Tosha on 21:28, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Subcategories
Talk:Thelma Houston

message: Remember a great single of Thelma's which is not listed here . From 1972 - Noone's gonna be a fool forever .   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.254.77.150 (talk) 13:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Croat Catholic Ustashi clergy/Archive 2

message: From Wikipedia:Votes for deletion#Croat Catholic Ustashi clergy in June 2004
-----
It’s just a list full of accusations but without any real attributions or research. It’s been marked for deletion already. It is offensive in its current, highly defamatory form. The article gives no attributions, no sources and no evidence for all the accusations.--GeneralPatton 17:56, 4 Jun 2004 (UTC)