Talk:Operation Red Dog

message: Yeah, I don't quite understand how White Nationalists would cooperate with a Black man to create a White Nationalist nation from a predominanty Black/mulatto country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.62.102.66  (talk • contribs) 21:37, 17 April 2007
:They weren't! Like it says in the talk section just above. Look, white "nationalists" in North America aren't trying to move to a tiny obscure island to create a "white nationalist nation" there; they're saying that USA/Canada are nations belonging to white people, and trying to kick out or exterminate others.
:And these particular white nationalists had found a black guy willing to turn a free, black republic into one big coke factory and whorehouse, and send the proceeds to fund white supremacist activity. And they wanted to play ball with him. What's so strange about that? If anything, the part that's a little harder to believe is that a black former head of gov't could have so little pride; but I guess we should never be surprised about the lure of money and power. But I agree; great movie idea.205.212.74.252 22:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: what?

message: According to Time Magazine  it was a BBC documentary that tied Barbados to the plot. CaribDigita (talk) 02:45, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone know where to find a copy of the BBC doumentary? 

message: I am concerned about the fact that some statements implicating David Duke in the plot are treated as factual despite the fact that Duke was convicted of nothing.
Here is the source for the statements implicating Duke: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=XSwdAAAAIBAJ&sjid=SqUEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6344,5264715&dq=david-duke&hl=en
Michael Perdue had made a deal with the Federal Government when he made those statements. 
Duke and others denied Perdue's statements. Evidently the jury did not find Perdue's statements credible, since Duke ended up not being charged in the plot. Your Buddy Fred Lewis (talk) 02:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I edited part of the introduction to remove David Duke's name when the NYT citation given did not mention his name. Duke can and probably should be mentioned somewhere in the article as the source noted above does connect him to the subject matter. -Location (talk) 23:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accusations that were not validated in court 

message: I have read the original target was Grenada not Dominica.  Shouldn't this be described?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.93.41.89 (talk) 17:43, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grenada 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Operation Red Dog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306065519/http://www.nationnews.com/Politics/26973.htm to http://www.nationnews.com/Politics/26973.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified