Talk:Royal Jordanian Air Force

message: what are the RJAF future plans. i think there should be a segment about that. but any how.. what are the future plans for the RJAF  in modernizing
none, they are suffering from lack of sufficient budget to even consider any replacement for the aging F-16A/B, a possible replacement could be the JF-17 as the RJAF have shown some interest in them. 185.139.222.83 (talk) 22:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  future plans 

message: When did the RJAF finally retire its F-5A/B Freedom Fighters? One source I've found says the combat aircraft were withdrawn in 1988-89. Another indicates 12-18 F-5A/B were retained as lead-in jet trainers until ca. 1993-94. Anyone know the real story (and have a reliable source)? TIA, Askari Mark (Talk) 00:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  F-5A/B retirement 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Royal Jordanian Air Force's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "defensenews.com":
From Pakistan Air Force: http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3637167
From Ilyushin Il-78: http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=3801474
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:44, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Royal Jordanian Air Force]] 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:33, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:12bh3.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:33, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:News114691.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:55, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:AIR CN-235 Gunship Conversion Concept lg.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.army-technology.com/news/news70843.html
*:Triggered by \barmy-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Royal Jordanian Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111201150615/http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2009/Jordan_09-33.pdf to http://www.dsca.mil/pressreleases/36-b/2009/Jordan_09-33.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120307123122/http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2004/Jordan_05-04.pdf to http://www.dsca.mil/pressreleases/36-b/2004/Jordan_05-04.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111201151657/http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/2006/Jordan_06-58.pdf to http://www.dsca.mil/pressreleases/36-b/2006/Jordan_06-58.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111201151616/http://www.dsca.mil/PressReleases/36-b/Jordan%2002-24.pdf to http://www.dsca.mil/pressreleases/36-b/Jordan%2002-24.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:41, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Uhm, what is exactly are you trying to do? You are not reducing sources, you are just blindly reverting. You even removed a picture I added Makeandtoss (talk) 00:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Tables are for quick reference material only and should be void of excessive text. The reader should be able to click a Wikilink to see expanded detailed information (per -WP:WHENTABLE). Furthermore three sources reporting the same information are not necessary see  WP:OVERCITE for more information.  Lastly articles are not to be crammed with a bunch on images per WP:IMAGEMOS - Thanks FOX 52 (talk) 02:21, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont understand. That guy obviously updated information, why remove the updates for some irrelevant issues? Also one more image is not going to cram the article. Makeandtoss (talk) 20:32, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Content issue

message: Does the Royal Jordanian Army also operate aircraft? An article in The Jordan Times (http://www.jordantimes.com/news/local/jordan-receives-eight-blackhawks-us) discusses delivery of 8 UH-60A helos to Jordan but says that the aircraft are being allocated to the "Jordan Armed Forces-Arab Army". Pardon my ignorance about the organizational structure of the Jordanian military. Carguychris (talk) 15:02, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Royal Jordanian Airforce and Royal Jordanian Army are both subdivisions of the Jordan Armed Forces. Wikipedia-wise the blackhawks should be considered part of the Royal Jordanian Airforce. However, in reality the blackhawks were distributed to several divisions such as 71st Special Battalion and a newly established special forces unit. But there's no source for this information, I know it from the local community here. Makeandtoss (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: UH-60 delivery to Army or Air Force?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Royal Jordanian Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151017214424/https://books.google.com/books?id=ESv1lwg537AC&pg=PA39&dq=%22jordanian+air+force%22+%22six+day+war%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=h2zrVJQmg7WwBNL_gtAF&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAg to https://books.google.com/books?id=ESv1lwg537AC&pg=PA39&dq=%22jordanian+air+force%22+%22six+day+war%22&hl=en&sa=X&ei=h2zrVJQmg7WwBNL_gtAF&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22jordanian%20air%20force%22%20%22six%20day%20war%22&f=false
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Royal Jordanian Air Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121115092422/http://www.dsca.mil/programs/eda/results.asp to http://www.dsca.mil/programs/eda/results.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified