lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Windows Messenger service

message: Hmm...
I'm not sure how to report malicious activity. I can research this right away. In the meantime, I've noticed that an unregistered user at ip address 172.142.130.133 has been contributing meaningless and hateful comments...
E dog95 20:16, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should there be a section on reasons to turn it back on after SP2 has disabled it?
Robotboy2008 03:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was curious and extracted WinPopup utility from Windows Me installation CD. It appeared as NE binary (16-bit Window 3.x executable format). This fact reveals what MS never ported winpopup code to 32-bit Windows 4.x. This means winpopup was included in the Windows 95..Me for merely legacy purposes. So referring to winpopup as eg: Windows 95 utility is not 100% correct. Anyone want to confirm?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.140.244.95 (talk) 23:00, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  original research 
Talk:Interior design education

message: After taking another look at the article, I think the design education info for the United should be combined, as this section could easily descend into an advertising vehicle for the design schools. Likewise, the list of schools at the end of the article should also be removed for this same reason.
This article contains a lot of biased and unverifyable information and should be checked for neutrality  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Interior Design Professional (talk • contribs) 01:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Your username suggests that you might be qualified to perform such a review.  Give it a shot and let us know (a) what you find and (b) how we can help! ElKevbo (talk) 01:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Combine Design Education Info for the United States
Talk:Strath

message: Is anyone out there?
There is a mistake here.  Wikipedia itself refers to the P&O's Strathallanhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Strathnaver, which makes five P&O Straths. Have any others been missed?
Prosopon (talk) 11:40, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  P&O Straths 

message: In the place names section, it states the "suffix" is used in many place names, but it seems to be used as a prefix... am I missing something?
157.248.5.3 (talk) 03:22, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place Names 
Talk:Que

message: 12:40, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Meaning:)
We have that for "sí" and "hola."
Why not?
DarkestMoonlight (talk) 17:32, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  That in Spanish 

message: That ridiculous junk about the weirdo needs to go in an article entitled Adrian (Que) Williams but I have no intention to do it for you. I will continue to delete that junk if placed here. Many other issues abound, however I will leave that to others once the correct article is created with the person's name. I like to saw logs! (talk) 20:15, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Mr. Williams 

message: In some software applications I remember seeing que being used as an abbreviation for queue.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priority_queue  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.80.113.162 (talk) 13:52, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  queue 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Qűė and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 20#Qűė until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Doug Weller talk 15:31, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Qűė" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Yangmingshan

message: Is there any info on the planned Gondola system? I think I read something on Wikipedia, but I cannot find it ... --JensMueller (talk) 13:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, Beitou Cable Car --JensMueller (talk) 13:32, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gondola
Talk:ConFusion

message: The newer table includes a field called Subterranean Press Special Guests which is not in the table currently on the wiki page.
It would probably be good to include that in the table too. If no one objects, I will add that.
ConFusion table Gbeeker (talk) 03:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past ConFusion table fields 

message: I propose that the recent additions were notable and should stay. Counterfeit Purses has repeatedly removed additions. Please stop. Gbeeker (talk) 14:07, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Additions 

message: I proposed to add back in the photos that Counterfeit Purses removed. Claimed notability, but they were notable in my opinion and related to the article.
ConFusion Panel 2023.jpg|ConFusion Panel 2023
Catherine Stein.jpg|Catherine Stein
Storm Humbert.jpg|Storm Humbert
Patrick Tomlinson.jpg|Patrick Tomlinson
 Gbeeker (talk) 00:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Gbeeker I think when someone "proposes" to do something, they generally state what they want to do and wait for feedback. You added the photos less than 15 minutes after you "proposed" the idea. You have stuffed this article with photos you took of people you know. They should be on Facebook, not here. I can't be bothered to argue with you about a page that no one looks at, but you mentioned my name. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 14:58, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable photos
Category talk:User qya-1

message: * (cur) (last)  09:06, 23 April 2006 Jon Harald Søby (Talk | contribs) m
    * (cur) (last) 09:06, 23 April 2006 Jon Harald Søby (Talk | contribs) m
    * (cur) (last) 05:17, 2 December 2005 Elric of Grans (Talk | contribs) m (Changed to proper template)
    * (cur) (last) 06:42, 1 December 2005 Elric of Grans (Talk | contribs) (Created page and original que-1 label (will template later))
Jon Harald Søby 20:27, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original history (before move)
Category talk:User qya-2

message: * (cur) (last)  09:07, 23 April 2006 Jon Harald Søby (Talk | contribs) m
    * (cur) (last) 09:06, 23 April 2006 Jon Harald Søby (Talk | contribs) m
    * (cur) (last) 12:21, 12 January 2006 Turukano (Talk | contribs)
    * (cur) (last) 12:19, 12 January 2006 Turukano (Talk | contribs)
    * (cur) (last) 05:23, 2 December 2005 Elric of Grans (Talk | contribs) m (Changed to template)
    * (cur) (last) 10:14, 30 November 2005 Turukano (Talk | contribs)
Jon Harald Søby 20:27, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original history (before move)
Talk:Burt Wolf

message: Thanks for the tags, but as you say: "give it sometime. The article is just a few minutes old" ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 20:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why do you never apply the same standards to me??????????  Smee 20:35, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't have to do the work on the article for the template to remain.  I will add it one more time, but no more.  It definitely reads like a resume.  Smee 21:46, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

text: The tag reads that "An editor has expressed the opinion that this article or section is unbalanced. I do not see that expression of opinion here. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 23:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: he talked of his mother's weekly mahjong games, perhaps he's jewish?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.28.231 (talk) 05:18, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  mahjong 
Talk:Benjamin G. Wilkinson

message: This is not really a biography - he is obscure and little is known about him personally. He is historically significant as a contributor to the King James Only movement, which is his only known claim to historical fame. Scott1329m 20:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is simply not correct to say that the Adventists use the King James Bible in any sort of exclusionary sense.  They recently came out with the "Clear Word" paraphrase which is very different, Ellen White sometimes quoted from the Revision and the General Conference has no objection to modern versions, which are used by many in their demonination.  Among some of the more historic Adventists (e.g. those involved with the health sanitarium movement) there is more of a King James Bible perspective, but even there, there is no one general rule.
StevenAvery.ny (talk) 20:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The Current Adventist Position

message: The second part of this paragraph reads as arguments for/against NT texts justifying Wilkinson, rather than only a description of Wilkinson’s own claims about them. (Grammatically, the sentence about John Burgon is unclear as to which text is being referenced.)
“Wilkinson criticized Westcott and Hort,[1] believing they made changes to the text used in translation. Due to the fact that they rejected the use of the Textus Receptus and instead used their revised Greek text based mainly on the Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus.[4] Those who preferred not to use the Textus Receptus, such as Westcott and Hort, used what Wilkinson claimed were corrupted manuscripts. Similarly, an earlier writer on the textual issues, John Burgon, called it a "fabricated text", and "among the most corrupt documents extant"[5] and likened the primary manuscripts used, the Codex Vaticanus and the Codex Sinaiticus, to the "two false witnesses" of Matthew 26:60.[5] .[6] The Codex Vaticanus that has come down to us had portions which have been collated and changed or edited by several scribes over the centuries, with many exclusions [7][8][9] and errors that were intended to be corrections made in the process,[10][11] while the Codex Sinaiticus has known textual variants in its text and exclusions.[12][13][14] Bluepenciltime (talk) 02:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography section
Talk:Bang Bang Machine

message: Obviously this isn't the best article written in wikipedia,
but what's this all about:
*Not notable. Can't see any non-trivial sources. Only gets 605 hits on Google.
If we are going to have a debate about how trivial wikipedia is then there's a lot more that needs deleting before this article!
This is a real band that had a record deal, played concerts, released records, got them played on the radio & even were voted No.1 in Peel's festive 50!
Show us a link to the discussion page about how trivial wiki is (and what is considered too trivial!!!).
Most people only come to wiki for the trivia. I mean would you trust anything here that was important!
Dyaimz 20:30, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm in agreement with Dyaimz, though the article needs some re-write, the group has demonstrated a notoriety to be included in Wikipedia. Shoessss 20:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:
Category talk:User sjn

message: * (cur) (last)  22:19, 22 November 2006 Sagabot (Talk | contribs) (re-categorisation per CFD)
    * (cur) (last) 17:19, 3 April 2006 Argon233 (Talk | contribs) (missing so added)
Jon Harald Søby 20:31, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original history (before move)
Category talk:User sjn-1

message: * (cur) (last)  21:46, 13 January 2007 Bellenion (Talk | contribs)
    * (cur) (last) 21:17, 8 December 2006 RashBold (Talk | contribs) (create category)
Jon Harald Søby 20:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original history (before move)
Talk:Dognapping

message: The article cites "Dogs can be fitted with a micro-chip that tracks them via satellite.". This sounds patently absurd. Satellite-tracking devices require a GPS receiver and a beacon of some sort (often GSM), the smallest possible package you could fit this into would be too large to act as an implant, the best you can do is on a collar, but that can be disposed of easily enough. Can we have more facts here, ktnxplz W3bbo 23:38, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracking via satellite 

message: "Usually, the dognapping occurs during walking time, and in the dark"
Even the external links show this to be quite wrong, it seems the most likely place if from an unsecured yard.
Johntranter (talk) 04:25, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occurs whilst walking 

message: Moved to talk, compeltely uncited, see comment above. RJFJR (talk) 13:50, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Methods 

message: Moved to talk because only one country and only citation is a dead link. RJFJR (talk) 13:51, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: By country

message: If a dog is stolen and sold for profit would it still be called dognapping, at least colloquially? RJFJR (talk) 15:16, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ransom vs sale

message: This term reads as rather a twee and dated one, to me, is it really still the most commonly used way of referring to the crime? A greater number of recent news stories are just neutrally calling it "dog theft". --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dognapping" term
Talk:Chlorous acid

message: There is a contradiction on this page, an acid with a pK of 1.96 cannot be called "weak acid". Can someone try to find a literature reference? phom 2007-1-18
:Weak acids have pKa > -1.74 --Spoon! 01:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Fluorine is oxidized to +1 in hypoflurous acid?  Oxygen is oxidized.  Water + F2 gives OF2 + HF, which then hydrolyzes in the presence of excess water.  Oxygen + fluorine is going to give OF2 also.  It would appear that oxygen is oxidized.JSR (talk) 21:13, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Hypofluorous acid
Talk:Aiki-jō

message: "It is well documented that Ueshiba studied several different styles of martial arts, including the art of jōdō (the way of the jō)."
To me this quote seems to claim that Ueshiba studied the martial art of Jodo which I'm fairly sure he did not. None of the principles of Saito (and others) Aiki-jo corresponds to anything of what I've been taught in SMR-Jodo. Ueshiba's Aiki-jo seems to be more spear-oriented with thrusts and blocks than anything else. Fred26 09:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the art of jōdō"
Talk:Logan Lake

message: This needs its own article; I can provide stunning orbital shots from NASA/JPL that show the scar of the mine; at first I thought it was an oblong cloud then I realized it was in all the images.....another mine in the same general to note needing an artice Giant Mascot Mine.....like so many others....Skookum1 (talk) 03:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Highland Valley Copper Mine]]

message: IIRC this was originaly a company town, only later incorporatred, as with Tumbler Ridge and a few others.  It's not a company town any longer, so like Kimberley and Trail and Tumbler Ridge it falls in a grey area - incorporated, but really a company town.  Not sure what to cat this as; maybe there sholud be :Category:Former company towns in Canada??Skookum1 (talk) 03:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Former company town?

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Logan Lake, British Columbia →  – Name is unique as town name, no secondary uses exist other than the eponymous lake which is only notable as being the origin of this municipality's name, target is redirect to current title. Canadian disambiguation rules per CANSTYLE say unique town/city names take no disambiguation Skookum1 (talk) 04:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've amended my own position to neutral. I was not aware that Lake Logan, New Zealand was just a redirect, and since there are no other article with even similar names I have no opposition.--Labattblueboy (talk) 06:25, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
See Talk:Haida (or if it is moved, Talk: Haida (disambiguation) where it appears that there was a statement that the puppetry claim made against me was supposed to be withdrawn?  -- 70.50.151.11 (talk) 05:08, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Waw an Namus

message: I removed this sentence as uncited:
:Some anthropologists attribute the rise of iron utilization by the Nok Civilization to iron deposits found near the southwestern face of this geologic structure.
It seemed better than slapping  on it and leaving it there. — Hex (❝?!❞) 22:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited assertion about Nok 

message: This line "other circumstantial evidence points to a Holocene or even historical formation of the volcano" and the other reference to "historical" in the article is rather confusing. Does it refer to history using the definition distinct from pre-history, i.e. within the past few thousand years? That's not clear from the link, which just goes to the Wikipedia article for history, which uses a different definition. I'd suggest re-writing that line. - Sdkb (talk) 04:23, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Reworote it a little to make it clearer. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing reference to "historical" 

message: When did the volcano collapse? forming the caldera?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:199:4300:3208:69FE:ABD6:1EB:EA12 (talk) 21:53, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't know this exactly. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 07:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collapse
Talk:Alishan National Scenic Area

message: Is it "Alishan" or "Ali Shan" (with tone marks of course)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JensMueller (talk • contribs) 20:36, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pinyin orthography 

message: "The indigenous people of the area, the Thao people, have only recently been recognized as a discreet ethnic group. They have long been confused with the Thao people." Is circular.  Obvious mistake here.--63.152.72.188 (talk) 14:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Header 
Talk:Mentawai language

message: If you are a native speaker of Mentawai then you can help translate this template into your own language:
 Edit
--Amazonien (talk) 23:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mentawai language template

message: Maeru, maeru! shi ya wikipedia a mentawai :)
Aman Digei, Bai Digei, Lili.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.54.72.234 (talk) 16:43, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Mentawai language
Talk:Alfred Winslow Jones

message: I substantially rewrote the article.  Comments/edits welcome--Work permit 20:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrote Article
Template talk:Infobox war faction

message: The template begins with the example at the top right of the page. I think we'd better act as this template which uses an useful and explanatory infobox while at the top right and brings the example at in next sections. What do you think? Mhhossein (talk) 02:10, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I don't see a lot of value in the parameter mock-up version of the infobox, but I have no objection to adding it if others find it useful. Kirill [talk] 02:36, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: OK! let's see what Greg thinks about it? Mhhossein (talk) 13:58, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example?! 

message: At the moment the only field that takes dates is "Active". However, this makes it a bit difficult to actually say how long a faction has been around. ETA (separatist group) for example was founded in 1959, but didn't become a militant group until 1968. It had several ceasefires on-and-off until 2011, when it permanently renounced violence, and will disarm tomorrow. At present, the infobox is rather confusing, since it has ETA as active from 1959 until the present day. Could we add some extra parameters for cases like these. So for instance:
*Formed 31 July 1959
*Active 7 June 1968 – 21 October 2011
*Disarmed 8 April 2017
This would be better for groups like ETA, the IRA and FARC. Smurrayinchester 10:27, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. The military unit infobox has this. For me, the active should only be used if an organization's existence was intermittent, such as it was disbanded but then reactivated at a later date (such as the ROKMC and USMC). – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 09:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seperate "Formed"/"Active"/"Disbanded/Disarmed" parameters 

message: The "Designated as a terrorist organisation by" center-align looks bad IMO. For example Jama'at Nasr al-Islam wal Muslimin: at first glance it seems like NATO is an EU-subsidiary. Is there a reason why it isn't aligned like the rest of the points? --Kraligor (talk) 23:46, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Designated as a terrorist organisation by" Text Align
Talk:Madou District

message: The user Nationalist is making this page really confusing. We have explained in the talk page of Guantian, Tainan that using Taiwan is better than using Taiwan, ROC or ROC. However he doesn't read!--Jerrypp772000 23:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, TingMing, tell me what you think...--Jerrypp772000 00:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationalist should stop

message: Just like Las Vegas [city], Nevada [state], U.S.A. [country]. The same goes for Madou. It is a political division article and very political in nature. We should follow the standard conventions shown above for Las Vegas. This is unlike Teresa Teng. TingMing 06:16, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Common usage is sometimes important too. ROC(Taiwan) would be fine with me. What do you think?--Jerrypp772000 19:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So, you mean that's good for you also?--Jerrypp772000 19:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: This is a different case, since ROC has a common name.--Jerrypp772000 19:49, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: No, you don't get what I said to that user. Maybe you don't speak English good enough, but I suggest you to read again and understand.--Jerrypp772000 20:14, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually I think you are the one who doesn't understand. You are from Taiwan too, so I wouldn't use that kind of language.--Jerrypp772000 20:28, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Uhhh... this?--Jerrypp772000 21:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a political division of the Republic of China 
Talk:Sheikh Feiz Mohammed

message: Is there anything positive something could mention about this guy other than that he is a terrorist?--Acewolf359 21:06, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I've just seen that there is an existing page on this same individual under the name Sheikh Feiz Mohammad. I suggest that we either merge the two or delete the article that I created on this page. Gerryfarm 21:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existing page on Sheikh Feiz Mohammed
Talk:Freddy Loix

message: Loix was driving in both the Belgian Chamionship and the IRC this year.  He was in all the rallies for the Belgian Championship (except one where the car wasn't ready in time) with the VW Polo S2000, and as of June 2007, he also entered all rallies for the IRC with a Fiat Punto S2000 (except China).
In 2008, Loix is expected to enter the International Rally Challenge from the start of the season with either Polo or the Punto.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.132.129.27 (talk) 01:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Prime Cuts (Jordan Rudess album)

message: Everyone is welcomed to contribute... --Λeternus 21:10, 18 January 2007 (UTC)