lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Frobenius matrix

message: Part of this page is taken and translated from the de.wikipedia article on the subject.
I would be thankful if you add to this site. I think it definitely needs information on the application of this matrix (Gaussian elimination) and could be restructured.
Ocolon 16:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: Would someone please explain the justification for naming these matrices after either Frobenius or Gauss?  It is not enough that someone has written a textbook or web page that uses the name. Jfgrcar (talk) 18:53, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be common usage. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 17:10, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misinformation
Talk:Axiom of global choice

message: "The axiom of global choice cannot be stated directly in the language of ZFC" this highly depends on the formulation of global choice. The very common version of "there is a class function F:V\rightarrow V such that  \forall x F(x)\in x " (whereby class means some formula with one free variable) is equivalent to the statement "there is a class well-ordering of the universe", which is equivalent to the statement "V=HOD", the last of which can be formulated in ZFC (for reference: see the chapter on HOD in Jech). 
--79.177.189.197 (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Formulation in the language of ZFC

message: On its face, this axiom is stronger than the axiom of choice. But Jech's book says that, in Bernays-Gödel, it doesn't prove any new statements that only mention sets. If that's true, then maybe "stronger" by itself is a bit confusing. Joeldl 16:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that it depends on whether you think that proper classes matter or not. JRSpriggs 06:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's right. Joeldl 12:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stronger?

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Axiom of global choice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axiom of global choice  until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eozhik (talk • contribs) 04:49, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[Axiom of global choice]] for deletion 

message: It is true that "strictly speaking this is not an equivalent of the axiom of choice nor a weaker forms of that principle. thus it does not satisfy the criterion for the subcate", as long as that category is defined as "for equivalents of the axiom of choice, and weaker forms of that principle." However, why not redefine that category as "for the axiom(s) of global choice, and weaker forms"? This sounds logical to me. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 19:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Axiom of choice?
Talk:Manager (Gaelic games)

message: Hi. Per WP:LISTCRITERIA, selection/inclusion criteria for lists should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by sources. The current list of "noted managers" doesn't meet this expectation (in that is unclear what notability criteria has been used, and - even if it were clear - provides no sources to support). For example, why is Offaly's Eugene McGee included? Perhaps the subject should have an article - but doesn't at present. Typically the minimum criteria for a notability-based list is that the member has an article. A "no red links" criteria. Or, for example, why are managers with a limited number of titles/etc listed along side those with many. The inclusion criteria in List of Gaelic football managers seems to be length of tenure. And the List of All-Ireland Senior Football Championship winning managers seems to be number of All-Irelands. Unless other notability can be defined, I'm inclined to change what we have here to a prose-based summary (of the most prolific, most long-lived or most-travelled managers), and link to the "lists of hurling/football managers by wins/tenure" for the rest. Otherwise this becomes a CFORK with unclear/undefined/unsupported inclusion criteria... Guliolopez (talk) 23:06, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a week or so since my note above. As I hadn't heard back on the proposal/topic above, I've gone ahead and made the change. (Essentially paring back the "list of noted managers". From a seemingly arbitrary list. To a sub-set of the most successful managers in each code. With a link to the existing "list of winning managers" articles.) Guliolopez (talk) 00:29, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Noted managers"
Talk:Jari-Matti Latvala

message: Most sources say that Latvala's record of being the youngest person to officially start a WRC event occured when he competed in 2003's Rally Greece even though fact has it that he began his Career at the 2002 Rally of Great Brittain. Can someone please correct this somewhere in the article?
Spokenwordsegment (talk) 19:47, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Like the article says, Latvala debuted in the WRC at the 2002 Rally GB. I don't know if he was the youngest to start a WRC event back then, but if he was, Andreas Mikkelsen has since broken the record. Prolog (talk) 00:07, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youngest person to ever start a WRC event 

message: Seems that the official fan website may allowed. If the BLP sends an email through OTRS would others consider allowing it? I don't really care but thought I would bring it up to avoid edit wars.--Canoe1967 (talk) 18:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:ELOFFICIAL]] 
Talk:Bandeja paisa

message: bandeja paisa is also the main dish in the other regions which are part of the coffee axis (eje caffetero) which at the same time where all part of one region which broke into several other regions. could someone please confirm this and include this on the article?. Thank you Minako-Chan* (talk) 14:51, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Antioquia or "Viejo Caldas"?

message: I see that underneath the "See Also" section somebody took the liberty to add the link to the wiki page for "This is Why You're Fat". If no one has any objections, I'm going to remove it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.199.85.10 (talk) 18:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: This is why you're fat
Talk:Brian Whelahan

message: :Brian Whelehan →  – Whelahan is the correct spelling of Brian Whelahan'a surname. This can be seen on his official literature, his political homepage and his pub front. Whelehan is a mispelling that occasionally crops up in the media and on sports blogs. Bongoball (talk) 11:59, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Suzanne Khan

message: This page should re-direct to the page Sussanne Roshan. Currently re-directs to Hrithik Roshan, which is a mistake, because-
# she already has her own page
# it is a link in the hrithik roshan page, and so clicking on suzanne khan redirects us back to hrithik roshan
I'd like to request protection be removed from this page. Thanks!
xCentaur | ☎  17:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Done.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hierarchiology

message: I don't think the concept of hierarchiology is notable enough to justify an article in its own right. I previously suggested this article could be merged with Requisite organization. Since that proposal was opposed (see Talk:Requisite organization), I now suggest it should merged with Peter Principle instead. As far as I can see, the only usage of the word hierarchiology is by Peter and his fans, as a way of describing the thinking underlying the Peter Principle. --RichardVeryard 17:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No comments in opposition. Merge to Peter Principle carried out.  Ipoellet (talk) 01:38, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Sea Mills, Bristol

message: This article is tagged with a template saying that the lead is too short.  Is the lead too short for readers to know what the article is about? If so, make the case here.  If not, I will revisit this article and remove the template. --DThomsen8 (talk) 20:53, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead too short? 

message: Hi, I have made some changes recently in order to improve the history section in particular. There's lots more to do and I am happy to collaborate with anyone else who would like to work on this. Help to structure the page would be useful. Soundmary (talk) 11:23, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaboration  

message: I came here wondering about the name, but the article says nothing about it. Are Clack Mill and Coombe mill the mills referred to in the name? What sort of mills were they? It doesn't seem likely they were the mills as they have no apparent association with the sea. I presume that there were mills on the shore of the Avon and / or tidal part of the Trym, which used the tidal flow to power mills as the name suggests. Alternatively it was also common on larger rivers in Europe to have mill barges/boats which would be moored in the flow of the river and mill wheels either side of the barge would power the machinery inside. Such barges would have worked here in the tidal flow. Another possibility for example, the Trym could have been dammed near the mouth onto the Avon and the tide would fill the dam at each high tide, to power a mill.
Can someone improve the article with whatever information exists in this respect please? Hopefully some information exists on when, where and what mills were used here and what was milled. If no information can be found, then this could be added to the article, with presumption of the origins of the name.
Lkingscott (talk) 12:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Augustus Quirinus Rivinus

message: Since this botanist is (far) better known by his real name, Bachmann, than as the latinised version of his name "Rivinus" (man from the river = Bach-mann), I propose that we move this article to A. Q. Bachmann. A search on Rivinus will of course remain possible. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:19, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move to A. Q. Bachmann
Talk:Functional weakness

message: I have reverted this back to Jon Stone's work. As Jon is a consultant neurologist with an interest in functional weakness I would question the sanity of any " orthodox" medical doctor editing this. On the other hand sceptics, go ahead! 
For an a sceptical point of view see www.conversiondisorder.co.uk where you can click through to a book on the subject of functional weakness and hysteria.
not gunna edit it but i am suffering with this disorder and it takes away most ov the ability to do normall everyday things. it has put me in a wheel chair as it has affected both my legs and i am unable to walk.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.104.173.224 (talk) 22:53, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Society of Engineers (UK)

message: I originated this article so that the Society of Engineers would not be forgotten. To trace it on IET website is difficult except on IIE Focus
[IIE Focus   http://www.theiet.org/aboutus/newinstfiles/IIEFocusApril05.pdf]
You can arrive at this address from the IET site [ http://www.theiet.org/ ]  and entering Society-of-Engineers at top right hand search box. Click 'search' and a list of results will appear. At the present time,(February 2007), the IIE Focus topic comes up as Number 4.
it was a struggle getting the history panel within the margins but this was accomplished in august 2007.
There were two excellent 'edits' by  Rich257 (August '07) and Michael Devore (Sept. '07)
see - (cur) (last)  12:49, 21 September 2007 Rich257 (Talk | contribs) (4,282 bytes) (Wikify) (undo) 
(cur) (last)  12:47, 19 August 2007 Michael Devore (Talk | contribs) m (4,833 bytes) (remove user sig, typo) (undo) 
Interesting Link
[Research Guide- History of the Institutions-  http://www.iee.org/TheIEE/Research/Archives/ResearchGuides/IEE&SavoyPlace.cfm] 
--213.94.247.135 11:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Arthropods/Article Classification

message: In the first table, why is GA-class below A-class? I always thought Good articles are of higher quality than A-class articles, but not as high as Featured articles. If I am not mistaken, GA should be above A.--Crustaceanguy 14:03, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance Scale/ GA vs. A.

message: I don't think the importance of the article is on a one to one relationship with the higher taxonomic classification. After all people see common arthropod and are interested in their ecology and ways to distinguish them from similar species with different ecology. At least I am. So I think there should be also some emphasis on the species articles, or articles about genera with a group of species that are very much alike, concentrating on their ecological and morphological differences.Viridiflavus (talk) 11:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I started a discussion on the "importance" classification page too as I think this classification is misleading, or at least needs some serious rewording. --Land Moil (talk) 21:20, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance/Taxonomic classification

message: I changed the importance of the Entomology entry from mid to high. It meets the listed criteria of "This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge" -AJseagull1 (talk) 21:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Entomology entry

message: I have noticed that "top importance" when it comes to arthropod articles seems rather disorganized. Some articles that seem like they belong in Top are in high, such as some of the subphyla (Why is Arachnid above Chelicerata importance wise, for example). The opposite problem also seems to apply, articles in Top that don't seem to belong on Top, such as the various orders (though this I can understand more). I am relatively new to Wikipedia, however, and I can't help but notice that this seems odd.
Schtompemphlatt (talk) 15:45, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Top" importance
Talk:Paul Singer (businessman)

message: I believe Singer's relatively new ownership of AC Milan, one of the most storied soccer franchises, merits its own section. Plenty of press on the noteworthy purchase: https://nypost.com/2018/07/11/hedge-fund-billionaire-paul-singer-takes-over-ac-milan/ Any objections? If not, I'll create a short section for it. Some of everything (talk) 02:53, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owner of AC Milan 

message: I'd like to discuss and ultimately reach consensus about if the term "billionaire" should be placed as the first adjective in the lead sentence. A couple of editors have recently added it to the article, and since I've removed it, I thought it would be appropriate to encourage dialogue here. While it's an accurate term, and I have no problem describing a living person as a billionaire, I don't believe that term should primarily define a man or woman. And for that reason, it should not be the first term to describe a person in the lead sentence. Instead, I believe a reader should be presented with the source's source of occupation before the billionaire term is presented. I checked numerous other Wikipedia pages of well-known billionaires (Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Warren Buffet, Mark Zuckerburg, Elon Musk, Larry Page, etc.) and found that philosophy was consistently employed there. The lead sentence uses adjectives that describes what they've done, not what they have. And while I understand that other Wikipedia articles do not a provide policy or guideline on this particular BLP, it does provide a meaningful example for consideration about how other editors have achieved consensus on this point. Some of everything (talk) 22:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Some of everything  Paul Singer is a financial predator, who's distinguishing achievement is destroying other nations' finances. He is not known for any positive contributions to humanity, and as such, his achievement of being a billionaire would be his primary, if not his sole distinction. Stevenmitchell (talk) 21:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billionaire term in lead sentence 

message: Under Career the following text is found:
"Singer is also the founder and CEO of NML Capital Limited, a Cayman Islands-based offshore unit of Elliott Management Corporation that allows Singer to avoid paying a fair share of taxes."
The term fair share is subjective and as long as he is following the laws, there is no need to add this. I sounds like someone with an opinion (which I also hold) is taking a shot at Singer. I recommend we remove it. 
New revelations about paying judges luxury journey and then the judge sentences in his favor in cases like Argentine´s soberan debt was made by AOC and must be added to the page. Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.115.230.193 (talk) 11:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide published sources to support your allegation concerning this "revelation". SPECIFICO talk 14:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased language about paying fair share of taxes
Talk:This I Believe

message: I have added details of the European version of this program. When the show was relaunched over NPR in 2005 it was announced as having previous links with the BBC, but as the record clearly shows it was in fact heard in Europe via Radio Luxembourg once the original American series had ended. The programs were then disected and repackaged by the London studio of Radio Luxembourg for retransmission under the sponsorship of the Co-operative Wholesale Society. The "Co-op" maintained member-owned department stores in the British Isles.
Following the end of WWII, the BBC had turned its previous "Forces Programme" that had previously served American GIs in Britain prior to D-Day, over to its "Light Programme" of entertainment. The BBC Light Programme did its best to throw-off all vestiges of American-style programming because the BBC had a monopoly that it wanted to protect from commercial radio interests.
From 1951 until the advent of Radio Caroline which began broadcasting from a ship anchored off the coast of Southern England in 1964, Radio Luxembourg also enjoyed a monopoly in commercial radio broadcasting heard in the United Kingdom. However, for technical reasons its English language AM broadcasts were only transmitted from 7 PM until about Midnight each evening. The current producers of "This I Believe" seem to be totally unaware of the details surrounding the programmes' previous European history. Fragilethreads 17:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ''This I Believe'' on Radio Luxembourg

message: Does anyone know what the name of the theme song is or who its composer is? I can't seem to find it. Xilofonista 22:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Music?
Talk:Khertek Anchimaa-Toka

message: This article doesn't cite any sources. Somewildthingsgo 17:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Nina Bang was NOT the first ever female minister in the world. See the page for Alexandra Kollontai, who was appointed people's Commissar for social welfare in 1917 (people's Commissar was a full equivalent of minister in the then Soviet government). Therefore, I revert back to Alexandra Kollontai.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by InArm (talk • contribs) 17:56, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nina Bang
Talk:St Werburghs

message: I have placed a fact tag on the Botany Bay information.  There is a Botany Bay in Henbury, see: Countryside Walks Jezhotwells (talk) 19:02, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Botany Bay 

message: In query why this page has been moved.  Most sources for the name omit the apostrophe.  I note also that the editor who moved the page did not change the instances of the name within the article. Please discuss. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:50, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please bear with me while I try to undo the mess up that I made with restoring the page back to its proper place. Hopefully St Werburghs (no apostrophe, no fullstop) should be restored soon then we can start the process of proper discussion. Sorry. --Simple Bob (talk) 22:55, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move
Talk:Sylvan Hills High School

message: This article has been reassessed following this assessment, the result of this was this article remaining Start / Mid class. The feedback given was: A reasonable article with some references and a few sections. However, for this article to really reach "B" class it would need many of these section expanded and fully referenced. Also some pictures would help. Camaron1 | Chris 19:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: A request for re-assessment was made for this article, and the article has been re-assessed, however no actual feedback has been given. I unfortunately didn't get round to doing so before going on holiday.
This article is generally well written and well maintained and the potential is certainly there for the article to reach good article status, although presently there are a number of issues which need resolving. I have reviewed the article and put some comments and suggestions below. They are not exhaustive, but they should point things in the write direction.
* Lead: The lead should introduce and summarize the article. The first sentence does the former well, but the article isn't well summarized here - there seems to be a lot about Sylvan Hills Middle School when this section should summarize what the article says about Sylvan Hills High School. WP:LEAD will provide guidance, but I will suggest that the lead be bigger with much more in it from the rest of the article.
**  Re: Revised lead based on WP:LEAD analysis and interpretation to provide intro into academic and sports history and notability. Djharrity (talk) 05:08, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feedback 

message: This article slipped off the radar with all the academic work I had to do, so apologies. Overall while the article is not faultless, it is certainly within shooting distance of GA, and could do with wider feedback - I would suggest opening a peer review. I will add this article to the list of potential GA candidates at WP:WPSCH. CT Cooper · talk 17:04, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Stapleton, Bristol

message: Buildings section dominated by detailed description of church. I propose to move to separate article, but in a few weeks time when I can edit from a PC and not an iPhone. Comments? Anyone want to go ahead? 109.218.237.25 (talk) 11:32, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church to separate article?