Talk:Mädchen in Uniform

message: I question whether Erika Mann had a "leading" role in this film or not. 
At least one German site I consulted on this:
http://www.lespress.de/0398/texte398/CW.html
says she had "einer Nebenrolle, als Deutschlehrerin" (an ancillary role, as the German teacher), 
and another:
http://mainz.gay-web.de/lbsk/film2002/
refers to Mann's "kleineren (smaller )Rolle"
An Australian film journal:
http://www.latrobe.edu.au/screeningthepast/reruns/thiele.html
even states that Mann was replaced during the film's production.
(So far, this site is the only reference I've seen so far that claims this.)
IMDB.com just says she had an "uncredited" role.
This is of significance, because this particular Wiki article is cited in hundreds of English-language sites out there that promote the 1931 film, giving the impression Mann had a "leading" credit. 
If that's not the case, then English-language web users are being given a different picture of the reality than the rest of the world, and this mostly seems to be traced back to this Wiki article. 
Perhaps some fact-checking is in order.
Offered respectfully.
-- Ruth Pettis (concerned reader)
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.121.60.135 (talk • contribs) 09:48, 27 May 2005.
I've fixed this. Wyss 06:54, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Erika Mann

message: How is it that this film had a budget of 55,000 DM 17 years before that currency was introduced ?? jmd 04:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe this should be RM 55,000, or it could be an inflation adjusted amount given in modern German currency. Wyss 10:53, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The DM is not modern.  It's obsolete. jmd 12:37, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant the DM was a modern currency until replaced by the Euro. Anyway, looking at the article's history, I'm not comfortable speculating about whether this was meant to be RM or DM and am removing the amount from the text for now. Thanks for remarking on this. Wyss 13:27, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, it was Reichmarks , I've fixed the text, following the source. Wyss 13:32, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deutsche Mark... in 1931? 

message: The 2006 American film by Katherine Brooks called "Loving Annabelle" is an "update" of this film, according to it's  official site.  Would that be worth adding?  Skulking
:Done. Thanks. Gwen Gale 21:16, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Works Based On 

message: :Image:Madchen In Uniform Video Cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the fair use rationale. This image is clearly fair use as a promotional image, promotional poster or cover art associated with the film and used in the article about the film to illustrate the film. Gwen Gale 04:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Madchen In Uniform Video Cover.jpg

message: Can anyone provide more information about the BFI version of the film? Does it in fact have additional, or only restored scenes? Was it (or is it) available for purchase to the general public, or just at retrospectives? Thank you.
:Available to buy on Blu-Ray now at , 89 minutes. --Rosenzweig (talk) 13:43, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  BFI info? 

message: The movie was remade in 1958 with Romy Schneider.--Tresckow 21:05, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake 

message: — Assignment last updated by ImmerFisch (talk) 17:48, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: GER 222 German Cinema and GER 322 German Film Studies