Talk:Dunlop Cry Baby

message: Anyone who knows about artists who use the Cry Baby, songs where the Cry Baby is used, or any more models of the Cry Baby, feel free to add to the lists.
--daisy-berkowitz
I added two Jimi Hendrix models to the list. Jhayes94 00:38, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Crybaby Models Artists, and Songs

message: I cut a good amount of text. The "number one selling" claim is unsourced, the "how-to" section is already covered (without any second person) on wah-wah, the section on technical details was non-NPOV, and the list of songs was sketchy; Hendrix, for example, used a Vox pedal more commonly, so "Voodoo Child (Slight Return)" is out. Sorry to cut the page like that; anyone with sources, please expand the page. Deltabeignet 22:55, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd vote for removal of "artists who use" list and replacing it with something brief and useful. In it's full form, this list would list literally thousands of artists and won't show anything good to anyone. I think about making a list of artists who did significant changes to CryBaby design, introduced new (may be signature?) models, used CryBaby in some unique way, etc. --GreyCat 04:56, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

text: With clear and NPOV designation of why particular artist is in the list ;) --GreyCat 20:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I forgot, also try to keep them in alphebetical order, by artist's last name. Jhayes94 14:31, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section removal 

message: There are discontinued models of the Crybaby, I think it might be useful to list them, but I don't know where to find the information. I know that the 105Q was preceded by a pedal called simply Crybaby Bass, and I've seen pictures of a purple bass wah called the Original Crybaby Bass. If the bass line has two discontinued, I'd imagine the regular line has even more, does andyone know for sure? Gopherbassist (talk) 06:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Older models?

message: 535Q - Features tone shifting abilities using the Q control, six different wah ranges, a volume boost, and can also be used as sustain pedal.
: the Sustain part is wrong, can‘t find any info on this. 217.110.14.122 (talk) 23:06, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Info on 535Q? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dunlop Cry Baby. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110824235134/http://www.jimdunlop.com/blog/?p=384 to http://www.jimdunlop.com/blog/?p=384
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have a GCB95 "H" revision which has a black inductor in it.  I wrote to Dunlop looking for an explanation, and I got their response earlier today. 
The change in inductors does not relate to the revision identifier on the circuit board at all.   The response I received states that from 1966 until sometime in 2003, the GCB95 pedals were manufactured with the black inductor.  Sometime in 2003, they began using the red Fasel inductor. So, some revision "H" pedals manufactured in 2003 have black inductors, like mine, while others have the red Fasel inductor, but they didn't change the revision of the circuit board when they did this. 
In the response from Dunlop, no mention was made of any revision corresponding to the change in inductors at all, only that the change was made sometime in 2003, and my GCB95, which is a Rev. "H" with a black inductor, bears this out. . 
If someone could update the article to reflect this more accurately, it would be appreciated. 
Gmeades (talk) 09:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not All GCB95 "H" Revision Pedals Have Red Fasel Inductor... 

message: Firstly, the product descriptions desperately need to be pruned back from sounding like ad copy.
Second, the list of wah pedals is WRONG. A quick visit to JimDunlop.com shows me only THREE pedals. If this sort of list is going to be offered, then it'd better indicate which modfels are actually in current (or at least recent) production.
Finally, until the article can point to true bypass or otherwise properly explain the term, I have removed most mentions. Weeb Dingle (talk) 23:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The article mentions 26 models; a big online retailer offers 17. These numbers don't line up well. (The Matsumoto edition might be non-U.S. only, or just out of production.) Weeb Dingle (talk) 01:06, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

text: I've spotted one article that briefly defines true bypass: DI unit#Active units. Predictably, no source for the claim is referenced. Weeb Dingle (talk) 17:54, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  model claims need maintenance