lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:I know that I know nothing

message: I am a little appalled by the fact that this article still doesn't have a Greek version. Come on Greek pals, this is one of your greatest contributions to the world !!--187.21.144.89 (talk) 06:42, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Greek article

message: The following question had been placed in the article. I moved it here. —BillC talk 11:12, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The translations from Ancient Greek into other languages shows same impreciseness?
This article needs a lot of work as it misses the real point that Socrates was trying to express. For example, the section from Apology is mistranslated. It should read "this man thinks he knows something, when he does not know it, but I, when I do not know something, neither do I believe that I know it." The crucial part has been omitted in the translation posted here.
Furthermore, the conclusions drawn are also incorrect. The point for Socrates is that the true path to wisdom begins with realizing one's own lack of knowledge. Only when one realizes that he is lacking will he then begin to address his shortcomings. It is by no means clear that Socrates doubts that a human can attain reliable knowledge, as is suggested in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bellerephon1 (talk • contribs) 01:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from article 

message: Is there any Sources covered connection? [funny thing: I'm Greek but it came to mind]. --62.1.24.60 (talk) 22:39, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  That reminds of Taoism 

message: I suggest renaming the article to, "I know that I don't know"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.193.112.62 (talk) 20:39, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better wording 

message: In Plato's Apology of Socrates there is indeed a phrase that comes very close to 'I know that I know nothing': ἐμαυτῷ συνῄδη οὐδὲν ἐπισταμένῳ (22 d1), that is "I was aware that I knew nothing," or "that I lacked any skill or certain knowledge of anything."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.71.16.90 (talk) 21:06, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, this is well-known. In fact, Gail Fine discusses that statement at length and still concludes that "it is better not to attribute" to Socrates the statement "I know that I know nohting." See Gail Fine, "Does Socrates Claim to Know that He Knows Nothing?", Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy vol. 35 (2008), pp. 49-88. Isokrates (talk) 22:49, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Greek 

message: Is "I know nothing, except the fact of my ignorance" (attributed to Diogenes of Sinope) a phrasing of this?
03:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diogenes 

message: Can this phrase be countered by "I think therefore I am"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Droonkid (talk • contribs) 23:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counter
Talk:Yaris (video game)

message: This article is going to need to be improved once the game is released. JAF1970 01:36, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this game is awesomely bad and this is what reviewers and critics are saying  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Exile142000 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  horrible 

message: why would you take away the reaction part of the article unless somebody really loves their yaris and doesn't want someone bashing it the game is out the verdict is in and people hate it and it is not vandalism so live with it i will re post the damn article until you guys see that it is an abomination to the video game universe and should not see the light of a tv screen again. and if this is the power of Toyota bringing down the hammer upon my judgmental head bring it on if i get banned for standing up for what is right whomever lays the ban hammer upon me will be sorry!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Exile142000 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? It looks really, really BAD. Please learn to post correctly -- read other game articles to see how critical reception articles are done, such as Catan. JAF1970 16:04, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I like how his entire post was basically 2 - 3 sentences. Zellthemedic (talk) 15:45, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  why? 

message: I don't think you can download this anymore. I checked and all I saw were gamer pics. Can anyone else confirm? I only have a Silver account, so I want to make sure you don't need Gold. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.196.3.123 (talk) 16:30, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Delisted according to a blog post on MforMature.net, and also the page on Xbox.com has been deleted. 86.41.89.154 (talk) 17:43, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Yes, this is true, however, there has been no official word from Microsoft about why the game was delisted. Well, nothing on the Xbox Press or GamerscoreBlog.com websites. --Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 20:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

text: You can actually still get the game, but not through the Marketplace.  I won't post the method here; it's only due to the fact that this is Wikipedia and not some forum..  If you want it you can come see me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MissingNoLLL (talk • contribs) 04:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still available?
Talk:Arthur Schopenhauer's criticism of the proofs of the parallel postulate

message: This isn't an encyclopedia article at all, just a string of quotes.--76.167.77.165 (talk) 03:15, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are three quotes. There are three sections of explanation. There is a "Notes" section. It is all factual material. There are no subjective statements by Wikipedia contributors. This article is related to the history of mathematics and contains information about a postulate that is crucial to the difference between Euclidean and non–Euclidean geometry.Lestrade (talk) 13:20, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: should be deleted

message: Currently the title of this article is "Schopenhauer's criticism of the proofs of the parallel postulate". I believe it should be "Schopenhauer's criticism of attempts to prove the parallel postulate", since "the proofs" never existed. Duoduoduo (talk) 23:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title not quite right
Talk:City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.

message: Needs some WP:MOS work and more citations from outside of the case (say the editor's notes in your casebook or commentary from journals, ALR, etc. otherwise it is more your interpratation/your law professor's view of what it means if you just cite the case, which means it is WP:OR). For instance the court does not apply an O'Brien test, they apply O'Brien and your professor or case book may have termed it the O'Brien test. More importantly, this looks like a case brief, which is not encyclopedic and rather difficult to follow for someone without legal training. News coverage of the decision and effects are great material to add. Aboutmovies 02:05, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The O'Brien test term comes from the actual opinion. And I disagree, it's a summary of the case, not a brief, and I certainly don't brief my cases that way. I do agree news coverage and effects would be good to add though.⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 17:34, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I missed the test part in the opinion (my case book omits those parts), but this still looks like a brief, not an encyclopedia article. See United States v. O'Brien, Brandenburg v. Ohio, Marbury v. Madison, Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., Brown v. Board of Education for examples of what a case article should look more like (there is no set standard, but sections like rules of law and prior history are legalise). Background works better than prior history, plus all history is prior history. Terms like respondent, summary offense, and least restrictive means (which there is no explanation for in the article) should be avoided as people without legal knowledge will not understand the subject. Basically, dumb it down to the high school level or so. Otherwise great job for filling in a gap of the free speech lineage. Aboutmovies 21:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I know, yeah. The object is to start filling in all these SCOTUS cases that aren't filled in yet into at the least, brief-style stubs, and then develop good and workable prose out of them. Just because we have a prose-written article doesn't mean that we have to make it useless to law students. I appreciate the constructive criticism though. I'm going to continue to work on it. ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 00:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: This article is written in a very convoluted way and I can't make out the meaning. Did the SCOTUS actually ban public nudity in the whole USA?
What about freedom of religion? If some hindu mystic obtained citizenhip in the USA and wandered around butt naked as required by his religion, he could be locked up, thus aking away his right to free excercise thereof?
What about little kids who play naked on a beach, etc., which is very common in Europe?
The article explains none of these and is written in such an obscured manner, only holders of legal degree can decipher it. 82.131.210.162 (talk) 16:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not very useful as it is
Talk:Precycling

message: The reference link appears to be broken.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.253.4.163 (talk) 16:39, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Oro (drink)

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:21, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]] 

message: The file :File:Soft Drink.svg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Soft Drink.svg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. If no action is taken, it will be deleted after 7 days.  Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Soft Drink.svg]]
Talk:Mount Callaghan

message: I mentioned these elsewhere but adding a note here in case any readers of this page may know something; just north of Callaghan there are some volcanic-type features - a table-mountain/mesa, I think, and some lesser cones, and I think a hot spring on the Squamish River side; just remember from living in Whistler and having friends who used to backcountry in the area that they were mentioned; and I'm sure I've seen aerial pics somewhere, too, though not on Randall & Kat's as I maybe thought at first (I checked).Skookum1 (talk) 02:52, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The table mountain is likely the Little Ring Mountain tuya..... BT (talk) 21:15, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Volcanic features on Soo-Squamish divide

message: Hi Ron, I'm just wondering if there are any sources for the content in this section after the first sentence. Thanks. Volcanoguy 03:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Mount Callaghan is part of the Coast Mountains per Peakbagger.com. See Wikipedia page Coast Mountains. This Climate section is a condensed version of the climate found there in the Geography section, where it states: "Because the Coast Mountains are just east of the Pacific Ocean, they have a profound effect on British Columbia's climate by forcing moisture-laden air off the Pacific Ocean to rise, dropping heavy rainfalls on the western slopes where lush forests exist. This precipitation is among the heaviest in North America. The eastern slopes are relatively dry and less steep and protect the British Columbia Interior from the Pacific weather systems, resulting in dry warm summers and dry cold winters." Ron Clausen (talk) 03:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate
Talk:偏印 (Four Pillars of Destiny)

message: ;Too difficult and complicated 
*The 偏 印 has no evil with　 and Sei Zai.The Sei Zai and Hen zai will have the effect of controlling to 偏印.
*The 偏印 often has the malice , however the Sei Zai or Hen Zai is apparent in the chart of Four Pillars of Destiny , the malice will be reduced.
*The relations between Condoleezza Rice and George W.Bush as co-workers are so interesting.Please see the page.----The DQN,macbeth 03:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of richest countries in 2006

message: The info here contradicts with the data listed at List of countries by GDP (nominal) per capita
217.132.145.204 03:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the basic difference between the articles anyway? Propose merge. Mikael Häggström (talk) 13:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction in data
Template talk:Master Editor

message: This page was the subject of an MfD discussion closed on 15 October 2007.  The result was no consensus. Xoloz 13:21, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lol. Wikipedia was created in 2001 - and this requires 5 years of service...--haha169 (talk) 18:22, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

text: So? --64.231.201.184 (talk) 19:51, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: MfD Result Notice
Talk:Outdoor recreation

message: In my opinion, the table of activities is not correct. Why is hiking in the mountains? Why is ATV riding in the forest? I suspect this is all original research.
This should not even be a table: it's a list, and will not be read correctly by screen readers. I'll just convert it to an alphabetical list, unless another editor has a better idea? — hike395 (talk) 12:26, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Table of activities

message: Types of Recreation 103.255.7.25 (talk) 10:01, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physical education 

message: Not sure of the exact criteria here so if there is one someone can correct me. I've added three common outdoor activities 'Cricket', 'Football', and 'Tennis'. Cricket is almost always done outdoors. The other two CAN be done indoors, but since things like ice skating and driving (go karting) can be too that seems a bad distinction. Football might be a more controversial one considering the sport has different names in different countries. Anyway I think the main criteria of the list should just compile anything a person might want to do outside for exercise, it's both informative and more useful that way. 188.30.69.30 (talk) 18:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the lede of the article, I would think that activities like sports or games that are purely done as a competition would be excluded from the list. I've removed a few such activities that were in the list. — hike395 (talk) 00:50, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of activities in the list 

message: Outdoor recreation or outdoor activity refers to recreation done outside, most commonly in natural settings. The activities that encompass 105.112.192.69 (talk) 12:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out door activity
Talk:Toni Muñoz (footballer, born 1982)

message: 2011-12 season: 
2012-13 season: 
MYS77 ✉ 06:11, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Felanitx stats 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 02:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 21:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 December 2020
Talk:Brecon Jazz Festival

message: It feels like this article has too much information about specifics about the event, which aren't going to matter to anyone unless you will actually be attending the event. Maybe someone could add more information about the history of the event; otherwise I think this might be a candidate for deletion. Thoroughbred Phoenix 03:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TMI?
Talk:Dirac bracket

message: I decided to not use Einstein summation notation to increase accessibility, but if someone thinks that it would be wise to use it in the name of increased readability, feel free. This is my first significant contribution to wikipedia, so if there are stylistic or implementation issues (like inline math or multiple lines of equations) please let me know so I can become a more sophisticated wiki-contributor.Steve Avery 04:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Einstein Summation 

message: May we have references in adition to Henneaux and Teitelboim and Dirac? Xxanthippe 12:09, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, those are the only good sources that I am familiar with. If you know of other good references, please share or feel free to add them yourself. I'm sure they are out there since Dirac brackets appear frequently in the literature.Steve Avery 12:58, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Someone informed me that Weinberg discusses Dirac brackets. So, I added that reference; see Ch 7 and 8 in Vol 1. Has some illuminating comments, but generally not as thorough as Henneaux and Teitelboim. Does this help? Steve Avery (talk) 04:28, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  How about some ISBNs? Xxanthippe (talk) 23:09, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added ISBNs for Henneaux and Weinberg, but I do not have an ISBN for Dirac. Steve Avery (talk) 16:29, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Added the ISBN for Dirac's book Simonjtyler (talk) 01:54, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Some other references are Gitman and Tyutin Quantization of Fields with Constraints and Sundermeyer Constrained dynamics Simonjtyler (talk) 01:54, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: More references?

message: 1) In the opening example section there's the statement "which are unusual in that they are not invertible to the velocities". This statement is too brief: can we expand a little to make its meaning entirely clear? Invert how? cstark (talk) 04:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Propose a change of wording. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested improvements
Talk:Łódź insurrection

message: Why are Lodz insurrection and Lodz Insurrection redlinks?  Gene Nygaard 06:09, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because they shouldn't be. :) Jeltz talk 08:02, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for fixing it.  Gene Nygaard 13:00, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hidden away

message: See Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Łódź insurrection (1905)/1.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  17:22, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article reassessment
Talk:Caílte mac Rónáin

message: It would help at this (and other such) articles to have a pronunciation guide.  This given name seems to vary between /kweel-teh/ and /kyle-chuh/, depending on specific modern Hiberno-English dialect, with some intermediate forms, like /keel-chuh/ (the one I would have expected, at least for the Caoilte spelling, and perhaps /kyle-chuh/ for the Caílte spelling, from the Irish class I took once upon a time).  Some source somewhere probably has an idea how it was pronounced in Old Irish. The family name seem to even out toward "Roh-nine", though I've also heard something approximating "Roh-nawin", and what I've been taught would lean toward that because of the accent on the á).  Does WP:IRELAND have any kind of consistent approach to this sort of thing?  Giving one exact pronunciation seems dicey, but giving three or more for each spelling would be overkill. Is it reasonable to provide a traditional Gaeltacht, vs Dublin standardized school-book, pronunciation?  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  19:55, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've commented on general principles at the WikiProject Ireland talk page, but I'll make a couple of specific points here. First, there's no such thing as a traditional Gaeltacht pronunciation: there are several Gaeltacht areas, each with its own pronunciation, and no one has precedence over another. Second, Irish pronunciation cannot always be reproduced as English pronunciation. "Caoilte" is pronounced neither as /keel-chuh/ or as /kweel-chuh/, but somewhere in between ("Caílte" would be pronounced the same way; it's only the spelling that has changed). The same holds for "Roh-nawin"/"Roh-nine". Is there any point in debating which is the more correct when neither is correct?  Scolaire (talk) 23:33, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:And When Did You Last See Your Father?

message: The motorcar in the film, "And When Did You Last See Your Father?" is a 1965 Alvis TE21 (http://www.motorbase.com/auctionlot/by-id/1920253043/).  The BBC website has a photo of the car with the license plate LWH 128 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/southyorkshire/content/articles/2006/12/07/film_diary_1_feature.shtml).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikismnth173 (talk • contribs) 05:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automobile: 1965 Alvis TE21 

message: Although IMDb and the poster in the infobox indicate the film's title is And When Did You Last See Your Father?, every reviewer, with the exception of the critic for the Manchester Evening News, refers to it as When Did You Last See Your Father?, as does the Sony Pictures website, Box Office Mojo, and the DVD. Does anyone know at what point the title changed? LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 16:54, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Which title is accurate?
Talk:Red-legged seriema

message: The bird may be predatory but what is its prey?  There is no mention in the article about its diet. 70.161.208.216 (talk) 14:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly what I was wondering!  — Athaenara  ✉  20:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Predatory, yes

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Red-legged seriema (Cariama cristata) head.JPG will be appearing as picture of the day on June 18, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-06-18. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:56, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Red-legged seriema (Cariama cristata) head.JPG]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Are there any high quality images that show the full body of the bird?Esagurton (talk) 07:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request for the main image 

message: The long second sentence in the 'Reproduction' section reads: 'During the breeding season, the male, more intimidating or forcing himself on the female, spreads out his wings laterally, moving them forward and displaying the contrasting arrangement of the flight feathers, a pattern similar to that of certain birds of prey, such as the African secretarybird (Sagittarius serpentarius).'
The opening clause of the sentence is not at all clear: 'During the breeding season, the male, more intimidating or forcing himself on the female, spreads out his wings laterally...'
'More intimidating' than what? Is this display a part of the male forcing himself on the female? If so, is that always the case? Do the females try to flee? The confused syntax makes this impossible to understand. 
RobotBoy66 (talk) 06:39, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reproduction
Talk:Class rank

message: This is an American concept, yes? If so, the article should say so. If it's used anywhere else we need info about it. I won't change the article or even add a globalize template, because not being American I don't know anything about the subject. --Ef80 (talk) 17:35, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize 

message: The article is VERY wrong. It should be the top 12.5% for the U of California, and top 33% for the state university system. That info is right in your California State University article. []
2603:8001:3846:2D00:1C10:2CC6:7CD4:AD8A (talk) 06:03, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Percent plan for California