lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:British Rail Class 483

message: I'm not sure how to edit the table accordingly, but the unit at Ryde St Johns Road siding is NOT 483001. It is one car each of 483003 and 483001. Alspittle 15:31, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 483001

message: Several news sources have recently claimedOn The Wight - 19 SeptemberIsland Echo - 9 November that only 2 trains are serviceable at the moment and when one breaks down for any reason the passenger service has had to be cut back to just hourly. Can we really claim that 4 units are "in service"?--Peeky44 What's on your mind? 09:35, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 - only 2 units serviceable? 

message: I've seen on the East Somerset Railways Facebook page dated 21 August 2021 at 09.45 that they've been given the task to restore 483009-129 for it's private owner: https://www.facebook.com/eastsomersetrailway/posts/4387017827986443
The full quote is "After recently admiring the excellent work of our skilled CTMS team - here's a peek at their latest project. A 1938 underground carriage from the IOW. Being restored for a private owner.  Photo - Nigel Dyson"
Not sure if we can use Facebook links even if it's from official source?
Zeoace (talk) 12:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 483009 - Coach 129
Talk:Alresford railway station (Essex)

message: Isnt alresford train station good? ignoring the one in hampshire i mean
When I was a kid back in the 1950s I spent a summer in Elmstead Heath and went to the station every day.  My Uncle Ted worked there and He taught me the meaning of the bells which rang as a result of signals on the telegraph.  All the trains were hauled by steam locos in those days and they all had their own name (as well as a number).  Many of the trains on the line were named after Div One football clubs.
Uncle Ted worked on his own most of the time.  Levers in the signal box were locked to pass control to the levers next to the level crossing which he operated.Bebofpenge (talk) 09:18, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Into the Labyrinth (TV series)

message: Merge Proposed - well, it's the same thing isn't it? KevinCarmody 15:46, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposed 

message: this is a top result on Google, it could really use a disambiguation. 219.90.168.86 (talk) 00:52, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  disembig 

message: The article states: "The Nidus actually belonged to Rothgo and was the source of his power" but it is not correct. Rothgo created Nidus and he (Rothgo) is the source of power of Nidus. Rothgo says that clearly and explicitly in first episode. 
I am not English speaker so I don't edit the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.63.151.45 (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is source of what
Talk:Black Monday (Malta)

message: The source is http://www.maltatoday.com.mt/2004/01/04/top_news.html
There is no need for a citation in this case.
The other thing, I do not believe is true. Maltesedog 15:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

message: I have reverted 134.146.0.12's recent edits to this page, because they could potentially have had a negative effect on the overall neutrality of this article.  An event that has never been proven remains an "allegation" or perhaps even a "rumour".  134's suggested wording that there was "news of a failed attempt" would imply that an attempt actually took place.  According to my research, no evidence of such an attempt has ever been put forward, least of all by the alleged victim of this attempt.  If I am mistaken, please cite a reputable source.  On the other hand, the F-A family assault was not only widely reported, but was also witnessed by many.  It is one of the tragic events that unfolded on Black Monday, and deserves a mention here.  lamato 15:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, that sounds reasonable 「ѕʀʟ·✎」 16:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Attempt" and "Assault" 

message: Please note that 'are generally believed' are weasel words, just like 'many say that'. An opinion of a lot of people is not a fact; 'The allegations have never been proven', on the other hand, is a verifiable fact. SeverityOne (talk) 19:44, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel words 

message: Unfortunately I'm not sure there are any reliable sources attached to this article. Can anyone find a newspaper report of the day, or some kind of evidence of the 'deep concern' shown in Europe according to this article? The only sources for the article are a POV piece by a PN member and a favourable profile of EFA. Both are from MaltaToday, which is unashamedly biased. 
I'm not saying it didn't happen, it just would be good to have more concrete information. It's mentioned that there were photographs and eyewitnesses, but there is no evidence of this in the article. Omgplz (talk) 16:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reliable sources?
Template talk:Convert to SVG

message: I definitely support merging the other template into this one. But would anyone object if I brought over its code? The other version looks better. El T 15:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The other does look better. - Рэдхот 10:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

text: The other one does look better... and has a better name.... --Aknorals 11:52, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I merged it. This one includes the other one now. The old text is still here, but not included. --Ysangkok 17:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to a redirect.  The old text is still in this history.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 19:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gcina Mhlophe

message: She is inspired by AC Jordan (The Wrath of the Ancestors, a Xhoza novel), Earl Lovelace (The Dragon Can’t Dance), Grace Nichols (The Fat Black Woman’s Poems), Zorah Neale Hurston, Milan Kundera, Isabel Allende, Zakes Mda, Paulo Coelho, Eskia Mphahlele, Mariama Ba, and Sindiwe Magona.
The above was removed from the article on 2 July 2006, because I could not find an appropriate place to put it.  Please feel free to reinsert if you can! --Hobbularmodule 15:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Influences (Removed from Article)

message: Why is the lemma Mhlo-p-e, while all sources show the name Mhlo-ph-e. Shouldn't this not be changed?
Greetings --Fritzober (talk) 16:43, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Mhlope and not Mhlophe? 

message: lethabo 105.245.116.37 (talk) 15:25, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It says in the article: "She tells her stories in four of South Africa's languages: English, Afrikaans, Zulu and Xhosa." Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:26, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which languages she use for tells stories
Talk:Mahendra Chaudhry

message: This article needs updating. Also, some of the claims it makes are of questionable neutrality (some are biased towards him, some against him — almost none of them sourced). I admit that I wrote much of this material about 9-10 years ago, based on news reports available at the time. Such links (to Fiji Times articles, etc) would no longer work even if they once did.
I have gone through the article correcting verb tenses (most activities are no longer current). Apart from adding a paragraph about the 2014 election (which I have sourced), however, I don't think I should try to "fix" the article in any significant way. Hi it VERY difficult for me to keep a neutral point of view. Therefore, may I suggest that somebody else, who has no strong feelings either for or against what Hon. Chaudhry stands for, take a look at the article, remove POV and put in sources? Thanks! David Cannon (talk) 11:27, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed — but not by me 

message: What impact has Mahendra pal chaudary has bought to the people of fiji 210.7.29.179 (talk) 05:09, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahendra Pal Chaudary
Talk:Logan Echolls

message: I know, it is a awkward topic, still I'm not entirely sure if we can conclude Duncan raped Veronica. I mean, of course it was no usual nice "first time" for the pair, but to my knowing, both - after Duncan explaining and Veronica finally overcoming her anger - never again saw it as a "rape". To me, Veronica's anger about Duncan as well as her natural disappointment about his keeping it a secret until then was directed at this secrecy and un-truthfulness. Also and importantly, keeping in mind Duncan was drugged as well, it is difficult to say who "raped" who. I would prefer to choose a little less sure-of-the-direct-circumstances report of the event. --The Growl 16:21, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Twice Raped" (Madison Sinclair's party)
Talk:Film treatment

message: The usage of "treatment" for a summary of a planned screenplay or script has expanded beyond film into television and even radio drama (see here for an example, where a writer is talking about his "treatment" for the Torchwood radio play Lost Souls).  This usage should probably be included in the article.  I don't know whether a page move to something like treatment (narrative) is in order, but it might be worth considering. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 18:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I mentioned in the intro that they are used also for "television programs and radio plays." 5Q5 (talk) 15:10, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage beyond film 

message: Is this what we saw during the movie Argo when the embassy employee was trying to talk his way past the Iranian border guards at the airport by showing the drawings that illustrated the Argo story?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.45.216.240 (talk) 18:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Argo

message: This article needs to explain the difference between a treatment and a screenplay, script
Gold333 (talk) 04:00, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference vs screenplay and script
Talk:Film distributor

message: Removed this comment about the article from the article and moved it here:
"This is an incomplete and general overview.  The actual practices of film distributors may vary from this model at different points in time during the history of film, and according to different national business practices affecting film distribution.  Thus, a full explication of this topic must account for all periods and nations since the beginning of film, or limit itself to the study of specific times and lands."Limbo socrates 15:32, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critique moved here.
Talk:Yosef Chaim Sonnenfeld

message: This wording "When he was four years old, his father Avraham Shlomo left him an orphan." is very Artscrolly, I'm sure we can come up with a better way to say that at four years old he became an orphan. Unless at four he got an orphan as a present. Yossiea 13:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So solve it. I just did, does it look better this way? Doesn't say anything about his mother. In Dutch, being orphaned means having no parents. In English, for some reason, it can also refer to having only one parent left. So, what about his mother? --Daniel575 14:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphan

message: Crz: You added the information that Rabbi Sonnenfeld was born in Kobersdorf. I have before me a number of sources seeming to indicate that he was born in Verbo (Slovakia). Can you please explain this discrepancy? Many thanks, Nesher 15:57, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nesh, I took earlier information saying he was born in Kobbersdorf, and did research to find the real spelling. I didn't originate it here. Here's Daniel575's original version: . Ja.... it doesn't say he was born in Kobersdorf - just my imagination! :) Thanks. - CrazyRussian talk/email 19:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kobersdorf or Verbo
Talk:UK Film Council

message: An awful lot of this article seems to have been taken word for word from UKFC promotional material. That's not terribly encyclopedic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BearAllen (talk • contribs) 23:39, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source/NPOV 
Talk:Production company

message: Why does "Television production" redirect here?  Seems very odd to me, especially given what I think should be the sister article Film production.  To me, an article about Television production should give one an overview of how a show is produced, not a list of companies. CzechOut  talk | work 02:21, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah, this list is not very encyclopedic. 142.162.78.180 (talk) 21:44, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

text: @CzechOut 86.163.61.74 (talk) 20:18, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

text: I want to job in porn industry 2409:4072:8E40:4A33:0:0:6089:5C08 (talk) 06:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Televison production redirection 

message: Currently this is just a list of production companies and a few shows they have been associated with.  The list needs to explain the role of the production company on each show, or the list is pretty useless.  Saying a company "produces" a show is too vague.  Does company A own show B (while licensing the rights to distributor C)?  Did company A finance show B, or put together the financing?
This sort of detail would help the reader understand what the heck a production company does - the intro is currently no help because it's so general and tries to catch all possibilities.  Tempshill (talk) 21:33, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Each item needs explanation 

message: been working on this article alot, this is all ive got. hope ive helped out. im switching wiki accounts so im leaving this page the way it is, hope i helped out! Bluebird29 (talk) 00:25, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  article 

message: My biggest concern is when you are filming a film you have a project that you and your team /crew are working on,how do you pay them according to their job tittle for example:a stage manager and an assistant director,will their salary or wage be equal or it will not due to the differences of job and the things they do are not the same how to balance it,in terms of them,getting paid. 41.115.54.175 (talk) 14:14, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The average amount of the crew members due to their job tittle.
Talk:Proriv (Transnistria)

message: We recently had some more anononymous edits to this article. I asked for a citation of some of the more dubious claims, but instead of providing any, the anon editor (IP 87.248.166.74) merely removed the  citation requests. In that case, we should revert until source and citations are forthcoming. - Mauco 04:10, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the confusion and thanks for the remarks. I agree on the necessity of sources to ensure the high quality. That is why I put some quotations in the article but you seemed to ignored them. Sorry that the sources are in Romanian and German, but a topic like that is not covered very extensivly. Nevertheless, I am wondering how many quotations are necessary in a small article like this one. Maybe it would be good to come back to the topic of 'Breakthrough' and rather discuss the content of the article... - A.J.M 13:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I fully agree! By the way, there is nothing wrong with being anonymous as long as your edits are good and can be sourced. But if you want to have an account, you can do so and you can sign your entries, too. Just put a dash ( - ) and four tildes (4 x ~ ) after everything you write on the Talk pages. - Mauco 05:03, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed 
Talk:National Symphony Orchestra (United States)

message: Per OTRS ticket number 2007042510013508  I removed the unattributed speculation re Fisher's contract, which rumour is contradicted by the orchestra's management. Guy (Help!) 21:51, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fisher

message: One cannot put up a person's name in an official post until it has actually happened.  (I myself have been corrected on this in other pages.)  Thus, since Eschenbach is not currently music director, his name cannot go into the music director list and the infobox until 2010.  DJRafe (talk) 03:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Eschenbach's name from info box and MD list
Talk:Assistant director

message: The term “MOS” for rolling cameras without sound recording is not of unknown origin in terms of language. It is an abbreviation of a German/English hybrid phrase “mit out sound.” 2603:8001:A000:A247:F87A:409B:FF6C:7454 (talk) 08:21, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role of Assistant Director in TV/motion picture production
Talk:Casting (performing arts)

message: An article (for the movie Nightwatch) linked to this page via a linked word of "recast". Could we get a discussion of this element of casting here? The context was that the third movie in a trilogy is to be "recast". Dxco 05:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it's an "element of casting", really.  It just means that they're going with a new group of actors for the third movie.  This usually happens when some actor is unavilable, or more usually it's a money issue, and the producers either have more of it or less of it than in the previous film.--Pharos 18:27, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

text: gojihgk 67.84.103.192 (talk) 23:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recast 

message: This article should discuss race-based casting and color-blind casting issues.--Pharos 18:27, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Racial issues

message: Why provide a list of "Current Daytime Drama Casting Directors", when this article is generically about casting for film, theater, TV? Seems lop-sided and out-of-place. Perhaps highlighting more well-known casting directors if there is a such a thing would be more useful? Keithh (talk) 16:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Example Director names

message: Written as an advert for breakdown express. quality is greatly compromised by this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.115.229.34 (talk) 14:53, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breakdown Express using it as an advert opportunity
Talk:Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants

message: This looks to be just a copy of promotional information from the CICA website.   Needs a major re-write.  Psnae 16:03, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now done.   Still scope for improvement.  Psnae 23:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: dear sir/madam
i am living in india and wanted to go for CICA course.
please let me know what is the fees, duration of the course, percentage of result .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.177.220.29 (talk) 12:46, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  interested in cica course 

message: Editorializing has been removed, in order to give this article a more neutral point of view. Inline citations have also been introduced in order to explain key points about the institute, the profession and their history.Raellerby (talk) 22:46, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  article updated 

message: I have made some edits to broken links, but it looks to be somewhat out of date at this point.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.253.28.68 (talk) 16:20, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs updating for the Merger 
Talk:Location shooting

message: why  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:114:1EFF:1496:FB41:7BA4:2CCE (talk) 08:29, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Remote location. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 21:37, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remote location listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Art director

message: Regarding major edits and additions I've just made, the objectives were to clean up the rhetoric and to make the section on Advertising art director comparable in content and length to the article on Copywriting, since the two jobs are analogous. The unattributed tale about Bernbach and Krone is something I was told or read while working in the ad industry. Although my recollection is that the source was authoritative, I have no idea who or what it was, and the story is unlikely to be true absolutely, considering that Bernbach "invented" the modern industry's copy/art team approach. I'll defer to others' editorial judgment regarding leaving it in. Unless it makes the section too long, I suggest leaving it in for awhile and requesting citation. Eplater (talk) 07:47, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up, people!

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Digital director. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 5#Digital director until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 17:28, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Digital director" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Junior Art Director. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 5#Junior Art Director until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 17:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Junior Art Director" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Set (film and TV scenery)

message: Hello, I’ve just been expanding the article on production sets in economics to a reasonably full size. I noticed a similarly titled article on cinematography and added ‘about’ hatnotes to link the two articles. However I don’t think the cinematography article is correctly titled: see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (plurals). Perhaps the plural was chosen to avoid a name clash. Can I suggest that the current article be renamed, eg. to ‘Film production set’ or ‘Production set (cinematography)’ or ‘Set (film production)’ or whatever seems best to people here. I don’t mind doing the renaming but don’t feel qualified to choose the title. Colin.champion (talk) 08:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: After a little more digging... the disambiguation page for set includes an entry for set construction which includes cinematography and never uses the expression ‘production set’. The articles are clearly related, and it would help to bring their terminology into line. Colin.champion (talk) 10:19, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

text: I guess I should make my own decision. I’m plumping for ‘Set (film and TV scenery)’. This is reasonably consistent with Theatrical scenery and with Set construction, and with the fact that the word ‘set’ is normally used on its own when the context makes the meaning clear; and it avoids suggesting that film and TV need separate articles. When the term ‘set’ is too short to stand alone, the commonest amplification seems to be ‘film set’ (which has an entry in Collins online dictionary), but I don’t like this because it’ll encourage the creation of a separate article on TV sets. Colin.champion (talk) 08:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

text: All done. If anyone doesn’t like my new name they’re free to change it. Colin.champion (talk) 10:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production set says: Hi! 

message: What is the difference, maybe those should be merged, set is not translated to any language like the linked article. Maybe just remove this and use as redirection. jcubic (talk) 12:24, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That may be a good idea, but there are pages analogous to film set in other languages. The foreign language links from Theatrical scenery – eg. fr:Décor – apply to film and television as much as to theatre, whereas fr:Lieu de tournage is kept separate. Colin.champion (talk) 15:45, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Filming location]]