lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CBU-100 Cluster Bomb

message: The above has been part of the article text since May 2010 and there's still no table to be found. It appears to be a direct quote from a source that wasn't completely copied, given the punctuation being wonky in the segment. My wiki-fu is not up to the task of building a proper table for it (don't know the appropriate format), but could someone else have a go at this? 83.183.209.57 (talk) 02:29, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The configurations of the Mk 20 Mods/ CBU-99/CBU-100 are listed in the table below"
Talk:Kansas City Art Institute

message: KCAI comprises nearly 600 students (representing more than 45 states and several foreign countries) and approximately 75 talented artists and educated scholars who serve as KCAI's faculty.
I'm bearly willing to accept has 600 students and 75 educaters without citation, but who says they're "talented"?
(69.76.197.156 00:39, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV/reads like an advertisement

message: A list of notables should only include names with articles here or in rare exceptions red linked names that require new articles. Please remove the recent non-notable additions to the list ...Modernist (talk) 16:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for flagging it.  I totally agree.  Even as it stands, a lot of the names on the list don't really establish their notability but that's a different issue.Americasroof (talk) 21:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The list
Talk:Shin Cup

message: I have been unable to find any reference to a Japanese "Shin cup" with packaging featuring battling robots and "2EXTREM4U", although there is plenty on the web related to the Korean "Shin cup" produced by Nong Shim, although its packaging is unremarkable. This article + the accompanying image looks like a joke. Recommend moving to Shin ramyun. --Pravit 04:18, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I have added the bit about a UK ban - I heard rumours that Nong Shim have tightened up their act regarding irradiated ingredients, but have yet to locate anything tangible to back this up. Paul-b4 12:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK Ban 

message: I don't really know about how to get the company's ok to post its pic on wiki but maybe one of you might.  Here's a link to what i'm talking about... and i believe its the company's website its posted on.  
http://www.nongshim-america.com/eng/upload/down.php?BoardId=Product&filename=Cup_Shin.jpg&path=Cup_Shin_69671175578184.jpg
(Xeroz (talk) 23:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shin Cup pic...
Talk:List of Colorado fourteeners

message: Please remove Mount Shasta from your Colorado Fourteener list.  
-Scott W. (Fort Lewis College, Durango, Colorado)
:Oops! So much for careful proofreading. Done. -- Spireguy 23:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mount Shasta 

message: Mount Bross has a prominence between 292 and 330 feet (Roach lists it as 312 ft., for example). All other articles about 14ers give a range of prominences - by giving only the minimum, it seems like we're not providing all the information it could. I suggest putting Bross in the main list. 
Irregulargalaxies (talk) 04:57, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mount Bross 

message: No one in Colorado uses clean prominence (the list should have 53 Ranked 14ers based on 300' interpolated prominence).  This has been the convention in Colorado since 1968 (Bill Graves).  The CMC list for 14ers doesn't rely on prominence, however, the accepted list of all 637 peaks 13,000' and higher is based on 300' interpolated prominence.
Jkirk 14 (talk) 19:58, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Clean prominence is merely a simple way to estimate true topographic prominence.  For example, if a summit is 14,100 feet and the key col lies between the 12,000 and 12,080 feet topographic lines, the clean prominence is the difference between the summit and the higher topographic line, or 2020 feet.  The true prominence is somewhere between 2020 and 2100 feet.  Many mountaineers (and I) prefer to use the average of the bounding topographic lines for the key col, which yields a prominence of 2060 feet.  Yours aye, Buaidh (talk) 20:25, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean Prominence?
Template talk:Grand Comics Database

message: Thanks to those that worked on , which is the template I converted into this one. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 04:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks 

message: I have never seen this before and after making  I made . Not sure what folks want to do with the latter - it is in use on a quite a few pages. My version has also been added to the layout/sources guidelines somewhere. (Emperor (talk) 16:27, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ooops
Talk:Trunnion

message: The topic is "Trunnion" not cannons, or siege weapons. There is a great deal of information in this topic which belongs elsewhere. I did not want to start editing - especially when there is so much that needs to be cut and pasted to a different topic - or simply deleted. 
I am not sure if, when, how,... all this needs to be reviewed or suggested, before actual revisions are made. If there is a "topic monitor" that overseas this listing, please respond and let me know what you suggest. 
Thank you. 
-Tom 
(tapwestport ` aol ` com)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tapalmer99 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:   Wamndering Off Topic  

message: Steam Locomotive
Just how many of these have had oscillating cylinders?Bill F 02:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:List of California 14,000-foot summits

message: I created this page to have a convenient list of only the California fourteeners. Feel free to comment about whether it needs to exist or not---but it is certainly useful for me in editing the individual fourteener articles. -- Spireguy 04:21, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first sentence of the lede states that the title of this article is jargon specific to mountaineering. I think this means that the title fails the Recognizability naming criterion. Can we rename this article List of highest California mountains, and then explain the cutoff in the article (as is currently done)? — hike395 (talk) 06:20, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: There is a fourteener not listed. Thunderbolt Peak is 14,003 feet tall. But I have also heard the number twelve so I'm not sure how to correct article. Source for Thunderbolt Peak: https://www.summitpost.org/thunderbolt-peak/150222  104.220.91.194 (talk) 23:25, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This list has a prominence cutoff of . The prominence of Thunderbolt Peak is , so it doesn't belong on this list: it is a subsidiary peak of North Palisade.  — hike395 (talk) 06:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Check Peak Number
Talk:Powell River, British Columbia

message: The redirect from the List of British Columbia rivers comes here, to a town article; small though it is the Powell River needs a separate article.Skookum1 (talk) 20:55, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Powell River (British Columbia)]] geographic article needed

message: I believe this is where the original source may have originated. But would be cool to see some real facts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_spans#Powerline_spans_in_mountainous_areas_requiring_shorter_pylons
Shadowbrooks (talk) 10:03, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Span Information 

message: I by accident didn't add the references to the PRMBA or streets from Townsite to Cranberry. I've fixed it now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:752B:1A00:7927:6BDD:6A1D:337D (talk) 00:03, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apologies 

message: I am surprised that no mention is made. Or perhaps is present but I am unable to locate it by control-F and the proper string. thanks. 151.29.149.29 (talk) 19:02, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  concrete ship breakwater
Talk:Rosaryhill School

message: Some material was added in 2007, leading to the possibility that there was a reverse copyvio. However, using Wayback, the material added was in the external article in 2006, so clearly a case of copying from another source. (This doesn't eliminate the possibility that the same author write both, but even if that is the case, the external article was available first, so proper permission must be filed if it is the same author.
I removed the material.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 15:07, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issue review 

message: The article will need a major housecleaning--appears to have been taken over by a few zealous accounts, adding layers of promotional content, with some copyvio for good measure. 2601:188:0:ABE6:2CE7:9FE7:32F1:AC2A (talk) 03:34, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed a lot of the promotional content and non-notable mentions. There are still scores of bold-face listings, and a lot of copy editing remains. For the moment I'm tapped out. 2601:188:0:ABE6:2CE7:9FE7:32F1:AC2A (talk) 02:13, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A mess of promotional and copyright issues, with rafts of non-notables 

message: In 2017 the former secondary section assumed its separate registration with its own IMC it may be a better arrangement to move the couple of paragraphs relevant to the secondary school to a separate article. 203.145.94.50 (talk) 10:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosaryhill Secondary School
Talk:Lingnan University

message: This entry is biased. For example, consider the section on the RAE 2014. We learn only what the good results were (in the University's opinion, I presume). We don't see a balanced presentation of the data, and information on areas of relative weakness.
My own view is that this article has been edited by someone within the University, with the aim of bolstering its reputation. It's especially sad that they should resort to presenting selective evidence, when they allegedly seek to foster critical thinking ability in their students.
(Note also that key controversies over recent years are no longer covered in the 'Controversies' section. See, for example, https://www.scmp.com/news/hong-kong/education-community/article/1878896/lingnan-financial-chief-quits-over-credentials)
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.46.79.250 (talk) 01:27, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias/Propaganda
Talk:Saint Francis University (Hong Kong)

message: I have reverted your move because CIHE is still the common name and is a better natural disambiguator. NM 03:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: We can move over to the new name once  per WP:NAMECHANGES. As of today, sources containing the new name are all about the name change itself. NM 20:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:L94A1 chain gun

message: I know that the word "British" is later in the article but it has to be part of the first initial so it sets the tone, I just added this. - Pernambuco 17:19, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: " firing two 10,000 round bursts lasting 20 minutes at 500 rounds per minute."? That seems dubious to me. Absurd, really. I don't see how any single-barrel machine gun could possibly fire 20,000 rounds off in a single burst. The barrel would melt; at the very least, it would be so eroded by the time you were 5 minutes in, it would render the exercise pointless. Bun barrels heat up very quickly, and once they get hot, they begin eroding and degrading. 20,000 rounds without pause would leave the gun white-hot, if not literally melting. I'm thinking the phrasing of that sentence is mistaken...I'm guessing they fired off 20,000 rounds without cleaning or taking apart the gun, but I'm sure they let it cool down between 10-second bursts. I mean, really...no gun, unless it had a very effective external-resevoir liquid cooling system could possibly fire for 20 straight minutes without stopping. It can't be done..45Colt 15:53, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cooling. 
Template talk:Pacific Islands Forum (PIF)

message: Like all the other political body templates, shouldn't this just be used on the politics of x page? I have seen it popping up on lots of country pages.--Peta 04:52, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: This image has been added to this template twice. The image is not public domain, or available under any free license. It's use here on Wikipedia is under terms of fair use. The use of such images on templates is proscribed by Wikipedia:Fair use criteria item #9. Please do not re-add the image to the template, as doing so is a violation of Wikipedia policy. Thank you, --Durin 13:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:PacificIslandsForum.png]] and this template
Talk:Shin Ramyun

message: This page seems to be written like an advertisement. Hairyshoe 06:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you'd ever had heroin-coated condoms during anal sex with infant koalas then you wouldn't dispute its popularity -- Philipbeswick, do you now understand the weakness of your argument? 99.231.241.146 (talk) 21:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Hello, this is just a heads up to inform you that :File:Shin packet.jpg, which is used in this article, has been nominated for deletion at PUF by myself. You can see my rationale and add your input on the nomination page, which can be found here. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 09:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:File:Shin packet.jpg]] for deletion 
Talk:List of jazz fusion musicians

message: Stan Getz fusion???  and Donald Byrd??? Can someone explain???  lol  Tvccs 05:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's listing anyone who ever tried jazz fusion. I hadn't known this, but I guess Getz briefly flirted with in an album or two. It should probably be scaled down to those who are largely known for their jazz fusion work.--T. Anthony 00:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have cleaned up the article a bit... The bands are now separated from individual musicians. The musicians which are not largely known for jazz fusion work have been removed. Finally, I added a table which should let the reader get a quick overview of jazz fusion musicians and their age, genres, and jazz fusion connections. 130.225.102.1 (talk) 14:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tyrone Crystal

message: The article as edited by Setanta747 claims that the person brough in from Europe was Austrian, but this reference claims he was German. Unfortunately the officiall website no longer works, if it ever did, so there is no confirmation there. All the current references are secondhand and therefore not necessarily reliable. ww2censor 13:11, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - its a bit confusing. I've added the information found in the website you mentioned and marked references to both, but I've also included a citation needed tag in the hope that someone can actually solve the mystery for us! I'll maybe do a bit of fishing in the next few days. --Mal 13:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who was brought in to teach the workers?
Talk:De Havilland Firestreak

message: The following book describes some of the Firestreak trials: Venom, De Havilland Venom and Sea Venom: The Complete History, by David Watkins, pub The History Press Ltd, 1 July 2009, ISBN-10 0752452002 ISBN-13 978-0752452005.--Toddy1 (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Trials

message: The info box gives the warhead size as 50lbs. In the text it starts that the warhead is 19.3lbs. This is a significant discrepancy. 19 pounds makes it effectively the day size as an AIM-9 warhead. At the bottom of the article it talks about a modernized version with a larger, more effective expanding rod warhead, but the missile being described is the Red Top missile, which has its own article, so I see no reason to give that weight in the summary of the article on the Firestreak.
I also find it very unlikely that that the interior of the missile needed to be both heated and cooled. The ammonia cooling was for the seeker head, as mentioned in one place in the text, not for the electronics. Why would you need to cool electronics hanging in a small tube in -40deg air outside a jet moving at 600-1,400mph? The fact that other parts of the missile needed heating to stay warm enough suggests the opposite. Why would the parts only freeze AFTER the missile is launched? The missile electronics are only active for a short period when the seeker head is active, not even long enough to build up dangerous heat in the electronics. So what is dangerous is the missile freezing up while hanging outside a jet flying at hundreds of miles per hour for an hour or more per flight. That is why the missile body is HEATED during normal flight. The seeker is cooled once active, as is the case with most IR missiles.
2600:1000:B12B:C46A:0:49:1AA5:A301 (talk) 10:38, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warhead size
Talk:Theme Park Inc

message: Hi 
Please can we add some team credits as follows
Producer: Stuart Whyte
Lead Designer: Karl Fitzhugh
Lead Programmer: Leigh Bird
Sound Design: Richard Joseph
I attach the photo of the credits section from the games manual as way of proof. 
Thanks Stuwhyte (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to add key team members to credits
Talk:The Verlaines

message: The Verlaines were named after poet Paul Verlaine - the same origin as Tom Verlaine's use of that name. This is NOT the same as saying that the Verlaines were named after Tom Verlaine, which is definitely not the case. I have this on good authority (the best, actually - conversation with Graeme Downes). I'm getting fed up with having to correct this item on the page - please do not keep spreading this myth! Grutness...wha? 05:21, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of the band
Talk:Brannigan, Begin Again

message: As I recently brought up at the wikiproject (here) it is time we did something about the cultural references sections. I am moving all unsourced references to the talk pages for the time being in hopes of creating a better, more thoroughly sourced article. Please discuss this action at the wikiproject link above so as not to split it over 72 different talk pages. The information removed from the article follows. Stardust8212 00:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural references 

message: I was just watching this episode again and I got to thinking wouldn't a place with high gravity have smaller rain drops that wouldn't hit as hard?
Zeos386sx (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good 'ol high gravity rain 

message: Okay, I am not sure if I used the right word there, but, at the begining of the episode, Hermes compares DOOP to the Federation of Star treck. However, because of the events of Where NO Fan Has Gone Before, is this possible?The Dark Fiddler (talk) 01:53, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that it's possible, because he didn't say it while in the presence of the general public. As there was no way for the police to have been alerted of this, no reactions of the same scale of Where NO Fan Has Gone Before would occur (whereas when Fry said Star Trek in Where NO Fan Has Gone Before, an alarm immediately went off, prompting the arrival of the police)
Redterror117 (talk) 20:43, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Discontinuation?

message: Just a notice.  But the comma is included in its title, that is, "Brannigan, Begin Again".  For prove, consult the US copyright catalogue:  http://cocatalog.loc.gov/, search for "brannigan begin", the only two results include the comma.  In addition, this is also a good website for checking on spelling of episodes. --Svippong 21:29, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A more direct link. --Svippong 21:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comma in title 

message: Wasn't it C 3 P O, not R2-D2 that played chess with Chewbacca? R2-D2 can't talk.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.8.250 (talk) 23:24, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chess 
Talk:A Head in the Polls

message: Seems like a very well done article , i couldn't find anything obviously wrong with it. 
Nice Work.Kingpomba 15:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed this so there is only one Wikiproject tag rather than two.  Also I disagree that this is A-class, I don't think it would pass even as a good article and so at best it would be B-class, I don't think aby articles in this wikiproject are currently at the A-class level aside from maybe Futurama itself. Remember A-Class articles should meet the criteria for a Featured Article, even if they have not been nominated for FA status. Stardust8212 19:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: As I recently brought up at the wikiproject (here) it is time we did something about the cultural references sections. I am moving all unsourced references to the talk pages for the time being in hopes of creating a better, more thoroughly sourced article. Please discuss this action at the wikiproject link above so as not to split it over 72 different talk pages. The information removed from the article follows. Stardust8212 01:53, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural references 

message: The article on porn actor Long Dong Silver states that his head appears in this episode. Is that correct? __meco (talk) 14:57, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long Dong Silver?
Talk:The Mall of New Hampshire

message: Does anyone know when JCPenney opened? I believe it was the last store to open after the expansion Wikicali00    36:0 05:23, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  .JCPenney
Talk:Xmas Story

message: Does anyone else recall the disclaimer that FOX ran just prior to this episode? It was something along the lines of "small children shouldn't watch this." Should this be added to the article? I do believe it was the only Futurama episode to have such a warning. DudleyScardsdale 02:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not until they start adding the same disclaimer to the rest of their programming!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.102.104.80 (talk) 05:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclaimer 

message: As I recently brought up at the wikiproject (here) it is time we did something about the cultural references sections. I am moving all unsourced references to the talk pages for the time being in hopes of creating a better, more thoroughly sourced article. Please discuss this action at the wikiproject link above so as not to split it over 72 different talk pages. The information removed from the article follows. Stardust8212 03:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural references
Talk:Raging Bender

message: "RobotMania XXII" is a parody of WrestleMania
:People continue to change this to say it is a parody of WrestleMania 22 (or 21 in some cases) but please be reminded that this episode aired in the year 2000 and WrestleMania 22 occured Five years later.  It is NOT a parody of that specific wrestlemania, only wrestlemania in general. If anyone else continues to post this please direct them here. Happy editting! Stardust8212 15:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RobotMania

message: These sneaked back in, with a link to some sort of edit history as well listed. I've removed every ounce of uncited material I could see. WikiuserNI (talk) 16:26, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion