lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1952 Winter Olympics

message: Was "Occupied Japan" an official country name??? Who announced the country of player as "Occupied Japan"? Where was the country of the name of "Occupied Japan"? According to the official report watch was attached , Japan is refered to as only "Japan". This article concerns the Olympic games. There is not related with a political situation of Japan.. I do not understand such as destructive edits. It is too nonsense..--Gettystein (talk) 13:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit-warring 

message: I assumed a vandal was at work on this article, and I apologize for that assertion, I cannot find evidence of that.18abruce (talk) 00:32, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ice hockey section 
Talk:Operation Lumberjack

message: This page also lacks citations, adding a tag for that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by KriticKill (talk • contribs) 21:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Tag 

message: Overlapping and duplicate articles about the same subject. — btphelps (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Battle of Remagen]]
Talk:Stuart Littlemore

message: Looks like this article could use a "Littlemore" work. Aaaaahahahahaahahahahahahahahahaah lol rofl lmao hahahahaha. 
But yes. more work. SkinniousChinnious 11:17, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Am wondering whether the sentiments Littlemore expressed in this interview should be included in the article at all? It seems he has not been happy with the direction of Media Watch since his departure. Wcp07 (talk) 08:04, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Littlemore on Media Watch
Talk:Operation Zahnarzt

message: ==Untitled==
This article does not deal with Zahnarzt as a follow-up operation of Nordwind. It rathermore deals with the western part of Nordwind. I suggest the content to be transfered and the article to be deleted.Antisyntagmatarchos (talk) 20:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Zahnarzt

message: This article does not deal with Zahnarzt as a follow-up operation of Nordwind. It rathermore deals with the western part of Nordwind. I suggest the content to be transfered and the article to be deleted.Antisyntagmatarchos (talk) 20:11, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Operation Uvda

message: I've been thinking, with recent consensus to move Kfar Saba to Kfar Sava, and other similar cases, maybe it's high time to seriously reconsider repeating incorrect transliterations. I would like to rename this article to Operation Uvda, as well as the corresponding disambiguation page. Maybe the page about the airport too, but at a later stage. —Ynhockey (Talk) 00:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to Uvda? 

message: Should be easy to determine, since it seems to be a common noun in Hebrew meaning "fact". Anyone?
There is an Uvda Valley with important archaeological findings (Leopard Temple etc.), an airport serving Eilat, and an operation at the close of the 1947-49 war, all named after the valley, or after the Hebrew word for "fact", or both, plus a popular Israeli TV programme by this name. So plenty of reason to sort this out - and sources to draw on.
Once this has been done, please extend the result to all pages containing the word:
Uvda (Israel), Operation Uvda, and Ovda Airport.
The latter might prove the most problematic,since even the int'l ICAO abbreviation contains an "O": LLOV.
Thanks, Arminden (talk) 09:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Uvda or Ovda?
Talk:Battle of Roslin

message: The largest army that England sent north during the 1st Scottish War of Independence was around 21,000 for Bannockburn, followed by around 15,000 for Stirling Bridge. The idea that 30,000 men were at Roslin is just nonsense. The size of the Scottish force is also incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AyrshireNeil (talk • contribs) 10:06, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is obscene 

message: 30,000 is the number given in the campaign box, yet the article says only a few hundred took part? I seriouly doubt that there were 30,000 troops sent by the English. The combined forces of Englan could not number 30,000.Tourskin 02:09, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  30,000? 

message: Supposedly it was 3 separate armies of 10,000 that converged  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.219.191 (talk) 10:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: It was not 30,000

message: The article for the Battle of Roslin is almost wholly copy and pasted from http://www.roslinbiocentre.com/location/the-battle-of-rosslyn. As such there may be issues of copyright violation, plagiarism and source reliability.77.103.95.102 (talk) 16:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy and pasting of article 

message: This is what Wikipedia says of the battle in the article on Segrave.
"On the first Sunday in Lent 1303 Segrave, with his followers dispersed, was suddenly attacked when near Edinburgh by some Scots in ambush, severely wounded, and taken prisoner with twenty other knights. He was, however, subsequently recaptured by the other portions of his army who had escaped the earlier surprise."
82.37.141.26 (talk) 15:55, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia on the battle in article on Segrave 

message: An IP user is engaging in an edit war on this article, by attempting to change it in a way which does not reflect recent scholarship, which is that this was not a particularly large battle. PatGallacher (talk) 19:41, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit warring

message: This article has recently been the subject of some downright fraudulent editing, attributing e.g. figures for the size of the armies to Traquair pages 110-111.  I have checked these pages in this book and there is nothing about this. PatGallacher (talk) 15:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Fraud
Portal talk:Scotland/Did you know

message: *...that the gothic Trinity College Kirk, in Edinburgh, was founded in 1460 by Mary of Gueldres in memory of her husband King James II of Scotland, and demolished in 1848, despite a formal protest from the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, to allow for the construction of Waverley Station. self-nom --Mais oui! (talk) 20:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Trinity College Kirk]]
Talk:Canvas 2: Akane-iro no Palette

message: so canvas 2 has a wikipedia article yet canvas 1's article has been deleted, leaving on this article a bunch of red links. for what reason is this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.10.144.28 (talk) 18:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Canvas 1?

message: This title is used both Anime and PS2 game. Original title (on PC Bishojo game) is "Canvas2 -Akaneiro no Palette-(Canvas2 ～茜色のパレット～)"、but I don't know official translization for PC. --ja:PiaCarrot 11:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On that note I realise that it's due to my western upbringing, but I think the anime ending was "unexpected" Max Vitor 18:58, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First header
Talk:Corsica, South Dakota

message: It seems odd to describe a place with a population of 600 or 700 people as a city without defining what the word "city" means in this context. Presumably it has some legal or formal meaning, because according to ordinary usage this would actually be a very small town. Metamagician3000 11:45, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Charles Seymour, 2nd Baron Seymour of Trowbridge

message: I'm having difficulty finding out about this title, Baron Seymour of Trowbridge, which doesn't seem to exist.  Anyone got any ideas? Deb 11:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed it up (dates from Rayment and a little data from the 1911 Encyclopedia). According to the 1911 article on "Seymour", "[Francis Seymour] had at first taken an active part in the opposition in the House of Commons to the government of Charles I., having been elected member for Wiltshire in 1620. He represented the same constituency in both the Short and the Long Parliaments; and he refused to pay ship money in 1639. When, however, the popular party proceeded to more extreme measures, Francis Seymour refused his support, and was rewarded by being raised to the peerage; he voted in the House of Lords against the attainder of Strafford, and in 1642 he joined Charles at York and fought on the royalist side throughout the Great Rebellion." Choess 20:25, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Deb 17:07, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:The Beatles

message: This category should not be a subcategory of :Category:Rock music groups? This breaks the category system: every category should either be thematic ("things relating to The Beatles") or descriptive ("rock bands"). The category "Rock music groups" is descriptive, while "The Beatles" is thematic.
In this case, the article The Beatles should belong to this category, as it is a rock band. And John Lennon should belong to the category "The Beatles" because he's related to the theme. But John Lennon is not a rock band, and so should not be in a  subcategory of "Rock music groups".
I won't remove it for the moment (it's actually in many such categories). Stevage 08:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked a question about this once at the categorisation page and didn't get an answer. You've explained it fairly well, perhaps you could update/expand on the guidelines? I've also struggled to work out which categories should be placed on a band's article and which on it's category page. --kingboyk 13:52, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Boca Raton, Florida/Archive 1

message: The Boca Raton Station is too insignificant to have its own article. -- Dalbury(Talk) 11:09, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Tri-Rail Station

message: The Florida Turnpike passes through unincorporated suburbs west of the City of Boca Raton. The Geography and Demographics sections apply only to the incorporated city. It is not correct to state that the turnpike passes through the city proper. There is a difference between "city" and "urbanized area". -- Dalbury(Talk) 22:55, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Path of Turnpike

message: The station is brand new and is a prototype to others being built. I find that significant...
This page is for the entire city (incorparated and unincorparated), the Turnpike is in the city, but not in the limits. BTW, I live in the unincorparated section so stop making it sound as if it is under a microscope, it's insulting.
P.S: Why don't you help with the West Palm Beach, Florida page? It's flagged and needs pictures of the skyline and Cityplace?
:I thought all of the Tri-Rail stations were being built to the same plan (most of them are finished), and have heard nothing about any one of them being the 'prototype'. In any case, I see no need for an article about a commuter train waiting platform. I think it is highly misleading to state that the Turnpike goes through the middle of Boca Raton. I am well aware of the old dispute about whether the areas west of the city limits really are part of Boca, and I normally don't give a fig one way or the other, as I live in Delray, but I just can't accept that the area around the Turnpike is the 'center' of Boca Raton. As for other articles to work on, I currently have about 70 items on my list of articles to start, and a similar number of existing articles to work on. -- Dalbury(Talk) 23:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added an explanation about the unincorporated parts of the city. Durova 18:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replies to both comments. 

message: Why the cleanup notice? ⇒ SWATJester  Ready  Aim  Fire! 00:23, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, but I reverted it back onto the page when an anon removed it on his first edit. I don't consider an anon with no prior edits qualified to make that decision. If an established editor wants to remove it, I won't object. -- Donald Albury (Dalbury)(Talk) 01:32, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup?
Talk:Malla-yuddha

message: No where will you find that mulla yuddha is written as a true wrestling martial art. It was taken from an e-mail to a website and one user (freedom skies) has unfortunately stretched it to claim that mulla yuddha came from the religious epics with Bhima practicing mulla yuddha. Alter in his book writes that mullayuddha is a generic term for wrestling.  Kennethtennyson 00:54, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: mullayuddha is disputed
Talk:Ultra Maniac

message: "The manga's ending resolved in Nina..." don't they mean the anime's ending? DTPQueen 00:11, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake?

message: Ok I think this article is left out. What does it need to be improved? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pathbinder (talk • contribs) 13:08, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what we need? 

message: These should really be changed into anime and manga characters, because otherwise this gets very confusing very fast. Better yet, have separate articles for the Ultramaniac manga and Ultramaniac anime. I think it would work better that way. Terra (talk) 19:33, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. That would violate our MoS. The two are not significantly different and do not warrant separate articles. Also, we do not group the characters into "anime" and "manga" segments, as it really would be nothing but a bunch of repeats and confusion. There are only a few exclusive characters in the list. We may group by protagonist/antagonist/supporting, or by clearly defined political/affiliate groups, but that isn't needed here. AnmaFinotera (talk) 20:10, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Again, no, their are not significantly different and do no need separate articles. AnmaFinotera (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Characters

message: Something that I'd like to know is how to properly pronounce "Tetsushi". It's either tet-su-shi or te-tsu-shi, and I know that "tsu" is a japanese character, so I'm confused...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.34.71.97 (talk) 23:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tetsushi
Talk:Verdens Gang

message: Why does it say that VG is a "foreign-owned newspaper". It is clearly not the case. It is owned by Oslo-based Schibsted ASA, which has is headquarters, main operations, registration and stock listing in Norway. Whether the stock owners are majority foreigners are irrelevant, that might change from one day to the next, and is the case with most companies listed on Oslo Stock Exchange.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.89.216.16 (talk) 19:56, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'd say that both of Norway's largest papers maintain ambiguous right-left leanings. Even the staunchly right-wing Aftenposten has taken to uncharacteristic opinions such as criticism of Israel. Joffeloff 17:08, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. It is very hard to characterize any of the major Norwegian papers. But I would say that if anything, VG traditionally places itself in between Dagbladet and Aftenposten. Naturally, one can argue whether or not this would be centre-left or centre-right or just plain centre. For now, I changed it back to centre-right since that's where the link pointed anyway. Fat Hobbit 01:35, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems that no one here considers VG a very far right newspaper, so how come the political allegiance notes "Neoconservative"?Larghe (talk) 19:57, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous 
Talk:Quarg

message: I read in one of the ref's that Quarg is a "fresh cheese", but I have no clue what that means.  Maybe someone can fill in the gap here? --Slashme 12:05, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fresh cheese?

message: I haven't actually read the 1989 article on Quarg manufacture; I just assume that the 1991 article quotes it faithfully.  However, if anyone is willing to make the effort to get it from a library, it should have good information to flesh out this article. --Slashme 12:08, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Aggresive referencing
Talk:Ripley Under Ground

message: What about the 2004 movie "Ripley underground" does anyone have any information that they would like to share about that? 141.157.83.56 12:10, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004 movie

message: Personally, I believe that these articles should mostly pertain to the novels, then to how they were interpreted as cinematic works (movies).  I removed the following phrase "However it was supposed to come out before the movie version to Ripley's Game" because it makes general assumptions about movie releases based on the order the books were written.  Obviously, a movie filmed in 2004 isn't "supposed to come out before the movie version" of ANY film filmed in 2001.  Ms. Highsmith, the author of the books, sold the movie rights to each of the books separately, meaning that several movie companies (not one) held the right to make those novels into movies, and there is absolutely nothing preventing them from shooting and releasing them out of sequence or with different actors.
:Why would a person do that? Seems a bit odd. Surely the series would be much stronger with one company and one cast of actors making the entire series? Mathmo 05:42, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Money! :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 14:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ripley Under ground - the book 
Talk:North Cape (Norway)

message: This article really needs a better map that will show where North Cape is in relation to the rest of Norway. K.Bog 06:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs better map 

message: Since there is no reference, I just guess that it was a mistyping of the coordinates (04/40 minutes). However as I searched on maps (google,bing,yahoo), and photos of GPS devices: longitudes is closer to 25°47′09″E. JSoos (talk) 17:53, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: North cape, where, what, is that? A region dosn't change name just because we start to use English. Nordkapp is, Nordkapp, not North Cape. Think about it, Vestlandet isn't West Land. Or Akers House?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oiiisann (talk • contribs) 13:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Optical isotropy

message: I have removed the following material from the main page:
: According to the textbooks of Optics isotropy means that the dielectric tensor is reduced to a scalar. Accordingly, materials with cubic crystal symmetry should have the same optical properties as polycrystalline or polydomain materials with random orientation of the crystallites or domains. This is only correct, however, if the domains are small compared with wavelength, otherwise polydomain materials depolarize light despite of being optically isotropic. 
since this is way too deep without context and explanation, which I am not competent to contribute. For the moment I have created a basic definition and leave it to someone more expert in this field to expand the article. Cje 12:36, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from article
Talk:Topological quantum number

message: I added Thouless as a reference but I did not see an actual definition of the the term. Cites for the individual examples should be found as well.--RDBury (talk) 20:54, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification by expert 

message: The article states that screw dislocations can be "described" by topological solitons.  Not sure I would agree with that.  Other than happening to generate a helical pattern, what is it that topological solitons do that describes the actual physics of screw dislocations? Wikibearwithme (talk) 07:46, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solid State Physics
Talk:The Devil's Arithmetic

message: GN
AQEN  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.160.7 (talk) 21:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page is now stubby thanks to people who think it was "too long" of a summary.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.192.12.173 (talk) 00:06, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed that tag, problemsolved.  Dawn Bard (talk) 00:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: hey

message: I completely cleaned up the article, and added minimal important information, including enough (two book awards and the fact that is was filmed) to justify the notability of the book. I removed a lot of unnecessary or incorrect tags.Markjoseph125 (talk) 04:49, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision 

message: In the Plot section we see "(Film Version; the book is a little different)". Is this the plot of the book or the film? If the latter, it should be removed or moved to The Devil's Arithmetic (film). Λυδαcιτγ 08:32, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot section
Talk:Shawnee National Forest

message: The wrong governing body appears in the infobox. U.S. National Forests are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The U.S. Forest Service would be considered the governing body. Fixing now, just wanted to leave a note. 69.137.246.61 (talk) 05:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong governing body in box

message: This article REALLY needs to be expanded...  maybe I'll log in and do it myself some day.  There are so many unique things in the Shawnee...  and there should probably be a section dedicated to the access issues... many of said 'things' are inaccessible or difficult to reach.  It's a very intricate place, deserves more than three general paragraphs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.69.206.106 (talk) 13:25, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: What a short article

message: I agree with the commenter above. There is a Geology Section, but no Biology/Ecology section? This forest is one of the most diverse bioregions in the entire nation, and its geology is very unique as well as diverse, from prairie regions to cypress swamps and trees estimated to be over 1000 years old- no mention of that either. (http://dnr.state.il.us/lands/landmgt/parks/r5/cachervr.htm).  There should be more emphasis on the topology (bluffs, knobs, glacial till plains) as well.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.105.117.31 (talk) 08:21, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete List of Sections
Talk:CBNsat

message: I think the posts have to more acurate since it says t hat CBNSat competes with Dish TV and Star TV. Dish TV is a provider in India only and they do not have the rights to sell their equipment in Sri Lanka. Star TV is a content provider and cannot be classified as a competitor. Sure they have a share in Tata Sky which to be launched in June but still they will not become a competitor in CBNSat since they also have only rights with India. 
:SATnet (StarTV Lanka) has rights to sell DishTV and StarTV in Sri Lanka. See  Cie68 11:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dish TV

message: Please understand that this is an encyclopedia, not a news forum. As you know we have been in great excitement after the return of CBNsat. However we should follow the rules of Wikipedia and publish the article in a more encyclopedia style way. I am not saying that you should have 100% correct grammar, etc. I ask all editors of this article as well as other articles to refrain from typing words in CAPITAL LETTERS, especially in headings. Avoid giving too much detail in the heading itself. Avoid using many exclamation marks, full stops, etc. to show exitement and importance. Also make sure that the details you just typed are clear enough for the average user to read.
Keep in mind that important and exciting ews can first be directed to the CBNsat Forum before publishing here. Cie68 11:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note on inserting Breaking News to the article