lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Helvella crispa

message: Please, check this article... I thought Helvella crispa IS NOT edible! --DrugoNOT 06:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Here is a nice image that might be included, since it shows a different, less-contorted habit (if it is identified correctly). 
--Tom Hulse (talk) 22:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra image
Talk:Ali Afshari

message: Did you put this page yourself, or did you make somebody else to do that?
:Who are you talking to, and what is your signature or IP address?  Rhetth 12:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Air Force Historical Research Agency

message: I work at AFHRA part-time as a researcher for hire. Let me know what type of photograph(s) you want, and I'll take them and upload them. Also, let me know what you want added to the article, and I'll add it in. Just ask away and I'll answer any questions. 68.207.167.239 17:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What do you want in this article?
Talk:Martin Stern Jr.

message: I became interested in Stern while trying to edit an article, a thing which had been lifted almost intact from some real estate puff piece found on the web,  about Encino Village.  It was of course summarily removed very soon after for that reason.  My efforts to polish a fraud were not entirely wasted, however -- hindsight says it served as a sandbox wherein more wikiskills began to become second nature without my realising it.  Maybe I'll write a R E A L  Encino Village article soon.   Athaenara 01:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now December. Still no Encino Village article.  –Æ.  ✉ 12:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedians|Wikipedean Irony]]
Talk:Archenemy Record Company

message: I just made the page because the Freezepop article had an empty link to it. I figured something was better than nothing.  The company does have 11 pages of google search results, and is already listed ont he disambiguation page for Archenemy_(disambiguation).  The google search also lists several record label directories, radio stations with releases in ranked playlists, and reviews of releases. These seem like they might fall into the company criteria #2... --Lizstless 06:57, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of Java (1942)

message: That figure of "150+ killed" in the battlebox is impossibly low. Grant | Talk 07:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The relevant Australian official history quotes the Historical Section of the U.K. Cabinet Office as estimating a total 15,000 Japanese casualties for the Southern Expeditionary Army in the Philippines, Dutch East Indies, Malaya, Singapore (etc) campaigns during December 1941-April 1942. That suggests about 3,000-4,000 Japanese casualties in the Netherlands East Indies campaign. But no precise source or breakdown by geographical area is provided. Grant | Talk 08:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese casualties

message: Ensured that the article is within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. --Rosiestep (talk) 04:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008]] 

message: If the US 'strength' was 750, it seems unlikely that 825 were killed and 1,067 captured. 90.240.143.251 (talk) 21:21, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualty numbers
Talk:Aladdin Paperbacks

message: (quote) "The imprint was established by Jean E. Karl in 1967, although there is a small amount of books which were probably published by Aladdin Paperbacks back in 1958, including "Annie Oakley" by Ellen Wilson."
:Probably? There should be a certain example.
:For Ellen Wilson, Annie Oakley, this source via Google Books says Bobbs-Merrill, 1958.
:Atheneum (where Jean Karl founded Aladdin) was founded only in 1959. Any Aladdin brand in 1958 must be unrelated. So I revised simply to observe in the lead that there may be other uses in publishing. 
:By the way, do we know that Aladdin Paperbacks was the official name in 1967? --P64 (talk) 19:47, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1958 Aladdin 
Category talk:Wikipedians in India

message: Hi Wikipedians in India, I think we should also become part of our coresponding local categories like Category:New Delhi Wikipedians to collaborate more effectively and locally. I am now seeing the (positive) trend of more and more locally relevant articles are being added to wikipedia and (thankfully) such pages have started surviving 'non notability criteria', thus it becomes more important to be part of such categories which can be used to enhance and maintain local information as well.
Global categories/pages like Wikipedia talk:Notice board for India-related topics can be fine for discussing topics spanning regions (e.g. 14'th Lok Sabha, Hindi Film Industry, Indian Railways etc) but not for state/city wise information, for such local data its better to use discusssion page of corresponding page (e.g. discussion page of Jhansi) and/or corresponding page(s) category (e.g. Category:Jhansi) and/or corresponding user category (e.g. Category:Jhansi Wikipedians)
Viki  POV: I see city/town wise Viki (Wiki) Clubs emerging out of wikipedia and such effort will help there.
Regards, Vjdchauhan 07:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Be part of local user categories as well
Talk:Hexley

message: I added the Hexley Logo. I believe it is used fairly and correctly. EricNau 07:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:03, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:The Itchyworms

message: I deleted "humorous" from the band's description. It's limiting the band's genre. Besides, most of the band's songs aren't even humorous. This could apply to Parokya ni Edgar's  music, but not to Itchyworms'.Moonwalkerwiz 07:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humorous? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Recent coverage in RS's favours the new name. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 20:20, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Itchyworms →  – Rebranding of band formerly named Itchyworms. Inclusion of The is now required for all citations of the band name where it was previously cited as simply Itchyworms 124.83.105.98 (talk) 12:28, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is for you to provide references, not we. Check WP:RS. Wikipedia requires usage from reliable, secondary sources. By talking on the band's behalf, you are a primary source. The crux is what do others call them?, and for that you need to show reportage, more or less. For examples, The Boomtown Rats or The Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band or reductio ad absurdem The The? The band's former nane would almost certainly be kept unless some WP:Conflict of interest prevented it 85.67.32.244 (talk) 01:04, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Tambayan Philippines has been notified of this discussion.  — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 11:09, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 August 2021
Talk:Jacob T. Walden Stone House

message: Just returned from a holiday event at the house and had a lively discussion with our village historian (a longtime friend) about how old it is.
She says not to trust any source (even the NRHP nom) that dates it to the 1730s as the earliest we can say it existed in its present form is 1799. One of the state's experts says the architecture is more Federal; the house also lacks a basement kitchen that we might expect to have had if it was built in the 1730s. Also, the earliest reliable deed shows that the first recorded owner (not Walden), bought the property in 1793. Why, she asked, would you have built a house on property you didn't own yet?
One theory is that it was built as an attachment to an older frame house (there's some evidence of this) which was itself later demolished.
She says she's hoping to publish something about this soon. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I took a look at the nom form. It actually says 1785, so I have updated the cite and the article appropriately. Daniel Case (talk) 02:46, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions about date of house construction
Talk:Cornelia Sorabji

message: It should be added that a Google Doodle celebrated her 151st birthday on 15 november 2017.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susmitauri (talk • contribs) 10:40, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Doodle on Cornelia Sorabji 

message: She was the first woman to sit the Bachelor of Civil Laws exam at Oxford. Source: http://www.ox.ac.uk/media/news_stories/2010/100301.html
- Add to main article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.137.15 (talk) 14:13, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxford 

message: I hate to be "this guy"; I enjoyed the article, both its subject and writing, but the claim in the article that Sorabji was "the first Indian national to study at any British university" (and the source to which it is attributed) are both wrong. A number of Indians had studied at University College London in the 1870s, not least Rabindranath Tagore in 1879. its entirely likely she was the first woman and the first at Oxford, but she certainly wasn't the first Indian university scholar in Britain.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earliest Indian scholar 

message: A redirect has been made from this mistaken form of her name, found in a couple of sources: see Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject_Women_in_Red#I_think_I_found_an_interesting_woman_in_red . PamD 06:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Columbia Soralgi]]
Talk:Humanistic sociology

message: This article is not a diatribe against Postmodernism. I have pointed to the difference, I have not labelled postmodernism as unscientific, like many others. It is important to avoid ontological extremes.  
*Nigel Savage 09:10, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Postmodernisim

message: Its unclear to me what the connection is between humanistic sociology and most of the content in this article.  I'm sure there is a way to connect structuralism, functionalism, etc. to humanistic sociology but that hasn't really been done here.
RedHouse18 14:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This Article Needs Major Help

message: Redhouse humanistic sociology started symbiotically in the States and Poland at the turn of the last century, since then it has stayed relevant (note the socio's group tag as High importance), this is its connection to all the major schools of sociology since that time. One importance is that it allows a perspective on the two competing paradigms of functionalism and structuralism and there many offshoots. That is to say and I believe it is true that humanistic sociology is apart from these schools thus allowing a unbiased critique (that is to say that a functionalist might disagree with a structuralist analysis and who is to say this disagreement is not a result of inherent bias such as capitalisms distrust of the concept of class structures or the Soviets horror of a bourgeoisie artists production of cultural capital). Also as I try to point out there is a thread of sociology somewhat independent of the functionalist/structuralist dichotomy leading from phenomenology to ethnomethedology  most notably in Bordieu’s work. Humanistic sociology is as relevant today as it was over 100 years ago and to all the major developments along the way. Any way I have tried to answer what I believe is a very good question of yours cheers58.167.42.253 09:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This Article Needs Major Help Note
Talk:Strega Nona

message: The text of this article seems to suggest that the author created the whole plot, not just the character. However, this story is remarkably similar to centuries-old folktales like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweet_Porridge . Perhaps the article needs to be corrected?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinferno (talk • contribs) 19:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Finos Film

message: :Can someone answer this? IMDB has a full list of Finos Films production. There is an external link to this page. Is it legal to use this list to add a full filmography to this page?
Netslaveone 17:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey there in 2006! Because it is simply a list, I don't think it would be copywright information. Try to reformat it though, then it definitely would be fine. BOVINEBOY2008 :) 22:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film List
Talk:Buckshot Roberts

message: The article on Buckshot Roberts has a link to Frank Coe.  The Frank Coe that is linked to was born in 1907, but is referred to in the article as having been a Regulator with Billy the Kid, who was shot and killed in the late 1800's (1880's I think).  I think this was put in mistakenly and someone just needs to fix the link.  Thanks.
The article on Buckshot Roberts also has a link to George Coe that is incorrect.  It links to a present day actor and not to the figure from the Old West that was involved with the Regulators and Billy the Kid.GrimGambit 18:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ross Stevenson (radio presenter)

message: Ross is a genius , if ever he needed another on air partner he would be ideal with Tony Martin
————————
Deleted following comment:
"and is one of the few 3AW announcers who does not make overtly right wing commentary on air."
It is unnecessary
114.77.66.191 (talk) 08:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added an off-topic template to the opening section as it is all about the breakfast show itself rather than being about Ross Stevenson, with references to the breakfast show. 
My suggestion is that the detail be largely removed. Maybe someone may like to start a separate 3AW Breakfast with Ross and John article. Melbourne3163 (talk) 23:26, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  April 2013 - opening section of this article is off-topic
Talk:In the Groove

message: Is it appropriate to say "In The Groove was a music video game from Roxor Games"? Does the Konami lawsuit entail this designation of the game? Or3n 07:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it does because it is no longer a game 'from' Roxor games. It can either be: "In The Groove was a music video game from Roxor Games" OR "In The Groove is a music video game from Konami Incorperated" jonphamta 06:31, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Despite current ownership, all In the Groove games to date were and still are a production of Roxor. You cannot retroactively change who made an existing game.  æronphonehome  18:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The music video game
Talk:Kanto Wanderer

message: More like Groucho-Marxian... They are clearly painted on, and make Kobayashi look ridiculous!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 23:20, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brezhnevian? 
Talk:Zigeunerweisen (film)

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
# Support — First and foremost, Sarasate's Zigeunerweisen and Carmen Fantasy are known worldwide.  However, the contents of this article—the Japanese movie—is virtually unknown, and needs to be moved.  Whatever goes in the parentheses should be fine; however, "movie" or "film" should be preferred over other words. --Endroit 07:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then write a stub on the musical piece and this move will be jusitified.  —  AjaxSmack   06:18, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I just wrote the stub.  Please move Zigeunerweisen (Sarasate) → Zigeunerweisen after the proposed move is completed.--Endroit 10:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Support — First and foremost, Sarasate's Zigeunerweisen and Carmen Fantasy are known worldwide.  However, the contents of this article—the Japanese movie—is virtually unknown, and needs to be moved.  Whatever goes in the parentheses should be fine; however, "movie" or "film" should be preferred over other words. --Endroit 07:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then write a stub on the musical piece and this move will be jusitified.  —  AjaxSmack   06:18, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I just wrote the stub.  Please move Zigeunerweisen (Sarasate) → Zigeunerweisen after the proposed move is completed.--Endroit 10:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes

message: # Oppose If it were to be moved it should be (film) not (movie). However, as there is no page dedicated to the record there is no reason to move this page, the link on Sarasate page can be changed. I plan to fill out this article at some point and should anyone throw together one for the record we can sort it out at that point. Even then, we're under no obligation to do it the same way as ja.wikipedia and this is a fairly important film, it was voted best film of the 80s by Japanese critics, I'm not sure how the record's notability stacks up these days. Doctor Sunshine 05:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Oppose votes
Talk:Northern Lighthouse Board

message: The accompanying comment was that the SVG is incorrect. As far as I can see the SVG has a less detailed lighthouse while the PNG is not correct either, since the Union Flag is drawn incorrectly---if the flag needs to be drawn to a specification, then neither flag is good. 
Even with the above comment, the SVG was better because even if the lighthouse was not totally correct, at least it could be covered under artistic licence; there is never an allowance for an incorrect Union Flag since specs are easily found.
202.89.152.34 07:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted, I hadn't noticed that the arms of the canton were the wrong size, and I have fixed them accordingly (based on WP's own specs). There is always an allowance for an incorrect union flag (an incorrect anything) due purely to human error in good faith, however :) Emoscopes Talk 12:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag: PNG vs SVG (edit no. 85519683) 

message: Does anyone know why the NLB changed the name of the lighthouse in 1964 from Dhuheartach to the present form Dubh Artach, or how to find out? Thanks, Ben MacDui (Talk) 08:37, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubh Artach

message: so WHY the commissioners flag uses the old Union flag?  this the entire reason i came to this page  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.71.180.168 (talk) 18:24, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  so WHY the commissioners flag uses the old Union flag?
Talk:Don Q, Son of Zorro

message: It doesn't say that the character's name is Don Quebranta Huesos. I had to look up the author to discover that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hesketh_Hesketh-Prichard  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.226.225 (talk) 23:06, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John I de la Roche

message: I would suggest, that for a since of competancy, the name should be examined, or more correctly, the variations in which this name can be searched should be expanded!  Thus, his possible names should include; 1. Jean I de la Roche  2. Jean I(er), etc.  3. Jean (ier), etc.  It should also be mentioned that it is possible that he is also the "Jacques de la Roche?", that is mentioned in some sources, it should be noted that Jacques (Jack) is an accepted nickname in both French and English.  http://gilles.maillet.free.fr/histoire/famille_bourgogne/famille_dela_roche_ognon.htm69.92.23.64 (talk) 22:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kachi-kachi Yama

message: "The wife freed the animal, only to have it turn on her and kill her. The tanuki then planned a foul trick".This is like The Farmer and the Viper.--207.81.163.97 (talk) 17:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Farmer and the Viper
Talk:Chicka Chicka Boom Boom

message: Can you please help me with fixing the disambiguation of M being looped? I’ve tried loop and looping, but these two are disambiguations. Thank you. Kurisumasen (talk) 23:47, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help me
Talk:Sands Macao

message: The Foxwoods Casino in Connecticut has 340,000 square feet devoted to gaming.  That would make them the largest casino in the world. VietGrant 08:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The claims is basically from foxwoods itself, do you think it is objective?  just like what you said and taught us, can you cite this from the related authority that you claimed? how about Bet to Go? how about LVS?  how about Travel Industry Review?  probably you do need to correct yourself arrogant attitude.  I know you are from Kansas, no wonder! 70.52.64.82 02:11, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest Casino? 

message: This article is past a stub.  If someone wants to request an expansion of the article use the  template and explain on the talk page what additional material you are requesting.  Marking an article as a stub says it is a very short article.  Vegaswikian 04:21, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it is a very short article indeed and THUS it is a stub.  Guia Hill 04:25, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason why it is a stub: this article got no content including what kind of gaming does it has. Guia Hill 04:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  stub v expand
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Punk Boi 8 3

message: User:Nathannoblet
Category talk:	1
Category:	12
Image:	4
Mainspace	131
Portal:	1
Talk:	64
Template:	16
User talk:	65
User:	39
Wikipedia talk:	4
Wikipedia:	150
avg edits per article	2.11
earliest	23:46, 28 June 2006
number of unique articles	231
total	487
Nathannoblet's editcount summary stats as of 07:44, November 4th 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 08:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Greenfield (Pittsburgh)

message: Are these people born in Greenfield? --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 08:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "People" section 
Talk:Philip Pearlstein

message: Rather too much praise to be considered NPOV. "Whole new range of plastic realities"? "Masterfully put together?" IrisWings 08:50, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: abstract expressionist landscape paintings.[1] 
is a contradiction in terms -  
Rrose Selavy (talk) 17:25, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  abstract expressionist landscape paintings? 

message: See discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyright_problems/2022_December_18#18_December_2022. - Indefensible (talk) 18:54, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright violation