lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fantail

message: The other meanings of fantails should be included and then be split up into separate pages, with this page being a disambiguation page.
:created Fantail (disambiguation). --Melanochromis 13:23, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other meanings

message: What order is the list in? If someone can advise what the order should be I can do the work... GrahamBould 11:57, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The fantail list is in taxonomic order. I'm not sure that this should be moved - what would you move it to? Why not put the other meanings at Fantail (disambiguation) instead? jimfbleak 15:25, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fine.  I've come from the fish area where the lists are in alpha order of species - just assumed they were all done like that.  Obviously wrong :)) GrahamBould 17:33, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sort

message: There's a nice little video of a fantail over at New Zealand Fantail. Should it be added to this page? Lisiate (talk) 21:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes… Probably a good idea 122.161.49.48 (talk) 12:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Add video from [[New Zealand Fantail]]?

message: I saw the last item not linking to the right page, and found it was so because solomons rufous fantail was misspelled with rufous as fufous. I correct it, see page  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.49.48 (talk) 12:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrected a misspelling
Talk:Process theory

message: I would like an example of a fallacy described in the text. Are there any suitable to the article? 79.220.181.164 (talk) 17:07, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical fallacy

message: I tried to find references on the Internet for the so-called Variance theory (mentioned in the article) and the only remotely similar results I got were the following papers on Models in Information Systems: Process-variance models in information security awareness research & Process, Variance, and Systems. The second paper connects at some point this theory with Management Research citing other specialized papers on the matter. Could someone having better knowledge of the corresponding literature add some proper citations to the articles and elaborate on the interdisciplinary connections implied by the article? --Omnipaedista (talk) 02:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Variance theory

message: Closest definition I could find was for 'surgent'. Although the word is intuitively understood, is it a real word?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.174.67.203 (talk) 02:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Surgence
Talk:Chancellor of the Australian National University

message: If no-one objects I will merge this into the ANU article. It can be adequately handled there. - Randwicked 11:24, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't. Big lists such as this are not appropriate for major articles such as the ANU one; it would have to be de-merged again if we ever wanted to get this featured, as it would be an inevitable objection. Ambi 11:31, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:William de Braose, 4th Lord of Bramber

message: "Instead, he evidently wanted to break de Burgh, and to that end invaded Wales to seize the de Braose domains there."
Is the "de Burgh" here a typo for de Braose or does it refer to Hubert de Burgh? If it refers to Hubert, the connection should be explained. Rhion 11:30, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: de Burgh(?)

message: There's just one.  So is she the wife of the person whose article this is - or the wife of his son?  The article says both.  What a mess.  Black Will is either the son or grandson of William III (every other source says grandson), so his grandmother was starved to death by John, not his mother.LéVeillé 03:27, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  There are TWO Mauds that get starved to death 

message: Hello,
John, Giles, Philip and Walter are the sons listed for this William de Braose. The article names Reginald de Braose as both uncle to John and " middle son" of this William. If he was John's brother then he is William's son. If he is John's Uncle then he is William's  brother. Both links to Reginald link to an article on William's
son.
So what is correct?   
Thanks
Tim  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timothypaulgallagher (talk • contribs) 23:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Tim, the article is correct. You have your William de Braoses mixed up!. John Giles Philip and Walter are the sons of a William who was the son of the subject of this article . He died in captivity with his mother in 1210. I have added two extra words to the "lineage" paragraph to make this clearer.Doug (at Wiki) 10:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sons John, Giles, Philip and Walter 

message: Thanks Doug.
Not sure that make it any clearer but it does help. 
Again thanks
Tim  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timothypaulgallagher (talk • contribs) 21:31, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  William de Braose, 4th Lord of Bramber 

message: The current version of the article (in "The de Braose lineage") claims that John, the article's subject William's grandson, was ceded (for a fee) both the lordship of Gower and Bramber by his uncle Reginald. Except that in John's own article, the lordship of Gower was given to him as part of his dowry when he married Margaret, daughter of Llewylyn the Great, who was the leader of Wales. Unless the lordship of Gower was in dispute between Llewylyn and Reginald (which is possible, because they were at various times fighting with each other over such things), it must be one or the other, not both. I'm removing mention of Gower passing to John in the relevant paragraph. If anyone has any knowledge that supersedes the dowry grant of lordship, please update accordingly. Cyberherbalist (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lordship of Gower for John
Talk:List of house music artists

message: Why is DJ Doc Martin who is responsible for bringing house music to the west coast since the early 90's not mentioned on this page. He also has a music label under the name Sublevel California and has been collaberating with house music dj's and world class clubs since the early 90's. 2600:8801:B81E:C000:3C9A:FDF0:3E47:1A12 (talk) 03:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributing artist and musician's 

message: This article isn't helpful for the non-expert to look for house music. It lists a wide array of artists, of which some it is unclear why they are on the list, or that are not really known for their house music (example: Pet Shop Boys are primarily synth-pop). The article could be more stylised like the article on post-disco (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_post-disco_artists_and_songs) which lists example songs and albums first. 2A02:1810:2F1F:E300:FC5F:3F45:4CEF:B6B5 (talk) 12:57, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Songs
Talk:Chindits

message: From the history of the article:
*Revision as of 08:43, 14 August 2016  HLGallon →‎Change of command: removed sentence tagged for citation required for seven years! Added detail and cite for Symes, and detail for Lentaigne
*Revision as of 09:36, 14 August 2016 PBS  "The The thing to do is remove the sentence as well as the tag not just the tag (CHALLENGE] and BURDEN). It is better to have no no information than wrong information)
* Latest revision as of 10:07, 14 August 2016 HLGallon Undid revision 734436635 by PBS restored untagged portion of paragraph. Place a fresh tag if necessary
That is not the way that WP:CHALLENGE works. A request for an inline citation is a challenge:
As you say the citation needed tag has been there for seven years. That is more than enough time for someone to provide an inline citation for the text. The thing to do is not add new template but to remove the text. The reason I added "CHALLENGE and BURDEN" to the history of my removal is because  as the section in the Verifiabilit policy says (Wikipedia:Verifiability#Responsibility for providing citations):
So HLGallon the burden lies with you to provide an inline citation if you want the information to remain on the page. -- PBS (talk) 10:29, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The tag was placed in revision [] by User:GraemeLeggett (talk). This contributor is still active. It is worth waiting for this contributor to clarify whether the citation needed tag referred to the final sentence only of the disputed paragraph, or the entire paragraph. (The edit summary made at the time was "tidy up", which is ambiguous.) HLGallon (talk) 01:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: looking at it again, the whole paragraph probably.GraemeLeggett (talk) 05:20, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenge 

message: I have read that the British officers would shoot their own wounded men under some circumstances. I have no further information.
:Read . This is not an "atrocity" in that it was not wanton savagery or punitive measures against prisoners of war or civilians. The episode is in the article, under "The Move North".HLGallon (talk) 15:06, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ANecdotes of atrocities.
Talk:Nicaraguan Canal and Development Project

message: https://www.theepochtimes.com/mkt_morningbrief/the-31-billion-bubble-scam-and-the-nicaraguan-canal-myth_4011212.html?utm_source=morningbriefnoe&utm_medium=email2&utm_campaign=mb-2021-09-25&mktids=6ff12fad427c7ac295616f788b681e40&est=H1PCKkaRDY2PgJ2EYxP%2B1d%2F6SfBRCpbEez498Uf56t8LzD7IxcwHZsU2%2Bx4XRw%3D%3D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.45.190.70 (talk • contribs) 05:42, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a reliable source. Matthew hk (talk) 06:00, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editorial from a source Wikipedia doesn't use 
Talk:Munchers

message: Newer Muncher games are still for sale.  Notable is Math Munchers from PCI Education.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.192.194 (talk) 00:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article is written in past tense

message: I've cleaned up and expanded this quite a bit, but there are other ways in which this article can be improved:
#list all operating systems on which Munchers appeared
#list all versions of Munchers ever made, along with the years of publication, and make note of which features were specific to which versions
#list all types of Troggles and describe their movement and action patterns
—Lowellian (reply) 12:24, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for ways to improve this article

message: , just like Reader Rabbit, we could make an article on the original Number Munchers game (and Word Munchers etc. to distinguish them from the franchise.--Coin945 (talk) 16:35, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , I've worked on Number Munchers and it's looking a lot better than it did before. Deltasim (talk) 18:58, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's looking great!!--Coin945 (talk) 22:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This could be another interesting series to work on!
Talk:List of Jordanians

message: The title "list of jordanians" is very dumb to me; there are 5 million jordanians! I think a better title like "List of Famous Jordanians" would be better, who agrees?
eshcorp
i agree on title change... should be a list of prominent Jordanians or something similar --Muradq (talk) 09:07, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't this be changed?
Talk:Mike Rudd

message: At first glance when I came here I was looking for info on Mike Rudd the head of the SDS in the 60's, if someone cuold make a disambiguity page that'd help anyone looking for info on him I think.  I don't know how to do it, nor do I have the time right now :).  Just thought I'd inform people that this might be useful.
:The above statement appeared on 1 December 2005 via  The weblink above is archived here. It seems you meant Mark Rudd? A disambiguation page is not needed.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:04, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rockbank railway station

message: I don't want to nominate this for AfD; but will this ever have any content at all? It's not even a stub. I'm not picking on Rockbank, this applies to any station article on Wikipedia that is just a point between two other stations. I came here via the random button. - Randwicked 12:58, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends how much you dig around. ;-) Wongm (talk) 06:20, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More than a stub

message: The pic of the station needs updating as a modern train station has been built at Rockbank around 2021. Kez1234567 (talk) 14:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the image MCT32 (talk) 00:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pic
Talk:Fatti maschii, parole femine

message: In fact, "femine" could be an appropriate spelling, being used in early italian authors as Dante, Boccaccio and Petrarca, while "Maschii" is certainly unappropriate
:It's not certainly unappropriate, old Italian used to spell the plural of nouns ending with -io (the case of maschio) as ending with -ii.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.0.162.195 (talk) 13:22, August 26, 2007 (UTC) 
 
i am italian. in old italian words that end with -io could have the plural form -ii (similar to latin)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.44.213.233 (talk) 18:27, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Brodequin (band)

message: The box on the left says "Deathgrind", but the actual content of the page says "Death metal". Since I'm not a fan of the band, I wouldn't know, but...which is it? Mister Deranged 22:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre?

message: The French version of Wikipedia has three brodequin articles, one for the torture device - a special form of footwear - which provided the naming inspiration for the heavy metal band, one for the heavy metal band, and one for the footwear (much in the same vein as the English Wikipedia buskin article).  https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brodequin  .  As I have noted in the Talk page of the English buskin article, either the English buskin article should be expanded to include 19th and 20th century ladies footwear variations of brodequins or a separate article on 'brodequins (footwear)' should be created.  (Loretta Chase in Vixen in Velvet, a novel (published in 2014) set in 1835 London (i.e. a Regency romance), has the exceedingly stylish dressmaking heroine clad in brodequins footwear described by the hero as "a bit of satin and a sliver of leather" and by the heroine as "half-boots called brodequins".  The sixth definition for buskin provided by Dictionary.com states "a woman's low-cut shoe with elastic gores at the sides of the instep, popular in the early 20th century."  And Merriam Webster refers to brodequin as "a high shoe worn by women".)  There is an English 'brodequin (torture)' article that should be part of an English brodequin disambiguation.Penelope Gordon (talk) 09:40, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lucinda Lewis

message: Not every person on the internet is net savvy. And not everyone knows how to enter data into data bases.  With time, her fans will learn how to enter into those DataBases and get her information updated to fit the NetJunkie's needs.  This was a start.  As for her two outside links; I have emailed her office and they stated that they are in the process of hiring a web designer to make certain they are launched in full detail for January 2007 with a Chat Room.
Ms. Lewis has been activily involved with life and not so active with the internet other than reading posts and responding when brought to her attention.
And yes, there are many Lucinda Lewis' a.) the car photographer b.) over 100,000 deceased Lucinda Lewis' just in the past 100 years c.) As for IMbd database; if you tell me how to get her listed with this thing, I can make it happen for her.
:Please read WP:NOT and WP:BIO and see why this article has been nominated for deletion. It has nothing to do with "NetJunkies" or "savvy"' internet users. Thanks. PJM 14:15, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:WCWM

message: :For future reference (to all of you WCWM DJs), do not advertise your show in the body of the article.  The reason being that your show will only last for a short time compared to the lifetime of the radio station.  Plus it comes off as pretentious as hell when you do it.  If you have a website devoted to a show, you can include it as a link in the "External link" section.  Let's keep it as professional and scholarly as possible.  After all, we have been doing this since 1693 =].
Djproject 14:10, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Warranty

message: What is the situation in the European Union? Is the warranty by law 6 month or 2 years? The closest I could find was https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31999L0044 --2A02:810A:11BF:E564:0:0:0:DBB3 (talk) 07:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Situation in the EU ?
Talk:Sanskrit studies

message: This page is im Werdegang-- at the moment I'm putting up a bunch of related primary source stuff on Wikisource. Mrgah 14:30, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

message: --Jondel (talk) 01:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Notable Westerners who avidly studied Sanskrit

message: There is clearly a lot that can be said in this article. It needs the attention of either an expert on the subject, or someone with the time and patience to dig up sources and piece together a coherent narrative. Sources are easy to obtain: look at the Indology for inspiration (not that it is any better). Shreevatsa (talk) 03:06, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Please expand

message: It might be better to move the page to "Sanskrit studies to the West" or something along those lines. "Sanskrit in ..." suggests that the article will talk about all aspects of the language in the said region. If the article isn't moved, perhaps the lead section should make it clearer eg. "Sanskrit has historically never been spoken in the West nor is it a literary language." Out of the four skills (Reading, writing, listening, speaking) only reading is mastered in Western scholarship. GizzaDiscuss © 03:16, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sanskrit studies is a better title for the article. I went ahead and moved it.--Rurik the Varangian (talk) 16:24, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of article 
Talk:Peter Mullan

message: He's involved with the Scottish Socialist Party isn't he? I certainly remember him being involved with their campaign around the time of the G8 summit. This might be worth a mention. Leithp (talk) 14:30, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 17:02, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Politics

message: Has anyone got a reliable source of his birthdate? (Apparently, imdb is not considered "a reliable source")
* 1 Dec  2005 (born 1960, Peterhead) & http://uk.imdb.com/name/nm0611932/
*14 Sept 2006 1959
*19 Sept 2006 1957
*19 Sept 2006 1959
* 7 Jan  2007 1956
*27 May 2007 1959 
*27 May 2007 8 July 1958
*18 Aug 2007 8 July 1959
*18 Aug 2007 2 November 1959
*22 Aug 2007 2 November 1956
*11 Nov 2007 12 November 1956
* 1 Apr 2008 12 November 1959
* 6 Apr 2008 21 October 1956
* 2 Nov 2008 2 November 1956
* 3 Nov 2008 21 October 1956
* 5 Feb 2009 2 November 1959
*21 Mar 2009 12 August 1955
Pdfpdf (talk) 00:00, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The reliablility of IMDb is discussed at Wikipedia:Citing IMDb and its talk page; it certainly would be better to site a more reliable source, particularly for biographical stuff.  Finlay McWalter | Talk 23:56, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

text: In the January 2001 Guardian interview it says he was 41.  That puts his birthdate likely in 1959; we can put that as a reliable source and say "born c.1959", with a hatnote saying "imdb says 2 November 1959". -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 00:01, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthdate ? 

message: It seems a succession of SPAs have been removing, without explanation, biographical material regarding Peter Mullan's family. The sources given inline for this were a uselessly tangential BBC mention, and a Daily Record story that has since been removed. For BLPs, particularly when we're making claims like this, Wikipedia articles have to be supported by reliable sources.  I've looked for evidence from other reliable sources, but I can only find wikipedia mirrors and a few blog comments. So I've removed this material, and it absolutely must not be restored to the article without reliable sourcing.  I appreciate that those restoring the SPAs' deletions have done so in good faith, thinking them vandalism, but for material like this we've no option but to be scrupulous. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 23:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: BLP issues
Talk:Henry Luttrell (wit)

message: I just replaced the redlink 'duchess of Devonshire' with Georgiana Cavendish, Duchess of Devonshire who I think was the lady in question. She was married to the 5th duke around the end of the 18th Century and was a noted patron of the arts.
I am not 100% certain about this though as it could have been Lady Elizabeth Foster who the duke married following his divorce from Georgiana. Can anyone confirm which it is? --Spondoolicks 14:35, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duchess of Devonshire
Talk:International Management Institute, New Delhi

message: We had two articles about the same topic, so I have merged them.  Here is the article which was at this name, and here is the newer article which has been written.  There is one revision which has been left deleted; it occurred after the new article was created, and it only added a link to http://www.imi.edu . John Vandenberg (chat) 10:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  merged 

message: The reference  does not support that the institutions programs are recognized as equivalent to an MBA. I propose to further remove all statements of accreditation that can not be supported by a third party sources, or else perhaps replace them by statements that the University says that ....  DGG ( talk ) 17:57, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: statements unsupported by evidence
Talk:Bishop–Gromov inequality

message: After whom is this named? Mikhail Gromov is clear, but who was/is Bishop? Also, what's the Levy-Gromov inequality? Lupo 14:44, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it Richard L. Bishop? Lupo 08:48, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes: the one famous for the Bishop comparison theorem. Geometry guy 17:05, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

message: The notation of the article is ambiguous with respect to the "Ricci curvature". As far as I understand it, the article is referring to the Ricci cuvature function and not the scalar curvature. In the article on Ricci curvature \operatorname{Ric}(\xi,\xi) is used for the Ricci curvature function. This makes it more clear that it is a function of direction \xi and not a scalar. Penguian (talk) 07:09, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity in notation for Ricci curvature?