lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rupert Read

message: Not sure why that tag was put. User:Pinkbeast states (see above) that the "main contributor to the page has a blatant COI". Diffs please? Wakari07 (talk) 16:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look through the article history. The main contributors have edited almost exclusively on this article. He's a minor academic who does not pass WP:PROF, a local politician that would not pass WP:NPOL. While it's likely he is now notable for his work with Extinction Rebellion, that has been in the last year. The bulk of the article was written long before that by what looks like a single individual whose only purpose in being here is to let the world know about Rupert Read? Catfish Jim and the soapdish 17:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: ,  and  have only edited this article and have made edits that appear to be by someone close to or very in favour of Read.  and , who created the page, have also only edited this article. Bondegezou (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm. Five SPA's that "appear very close to or very in favour" of the subject is quite unlike a "blatant COI" account. Unless these 5 accounts are sock puppetry by Rupert Read or his henchmen, this is clearly not autobiography. As for stating in the tag that these accounts are "someone connected to the subject", I don't see a single diff as even remote evidence. This guy co-wrote The New Wittgenstein, he is cited thousands of times by his academic peers and he is a central figure of lauded and loathed Extinction Rebellion. Wakari07 (talk) 19:11, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That is precisely what those accounts are. Extinction Rebellion is less than two years old... the edits were made by these accounts prior to this. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 22:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

text: As for diffs, multiple accounts that spring up focused entirely on this subject, the more recent ones using characteristic a c&p citation style  , , ,  (this one clearly by someone with a COI ,  (this one refers to one of Read's campaign groups in the first person),  Catfish Jim and the soapdish 22:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Would the coi tag be more appropriate than the autobiography tag? Bondegezou (talk) 08:52, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  <nowiki>{{Autobiography}} tag</nowiki>
Talk:Will Whitehorn

message: I followed the links given by the original creator of the article and only one of them deals with this person specifically.  I don't know if this qualifies as notability. Is this thing working? (talk) 23:30, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion

message: Even with the references, this article still looks like a stub to me. As User:Isthisthingworking points out above, work really should be done on this article to clarify the notability of the subject. (sdsds - talk) 01:42, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rated stub for both bio and space 
Talk:North East Lincolnshire

message: Some good work, but not enough citations--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 06:44, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Assesment

message: Is it really important to the governance section that a murderer lived in the council area?
There have been many such criminals in every council area, it doesn't reflect on governance in my opinion. Council leaders, and mayors, would be more relevant to the subject.
I will delete the Soham Murders paragraph if there are no objections.
Thanks
Jojo the Dodo (talk) 23:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Governance?
Talk:West Berkshire

message: According to the article, "Around 65% of people live and work in West Berkshire".
This is clearly not saying what it was meant to say - "65% of people" equates to about 4.5 billion people. However it's not clear what it is trying to say: "65% of people who live in West Berkshire also work in West Berkshire"? That seems unlikely too; wouldn't children, pensioners and people who elect not to work or are unable to work mean that less than 65% of West Berkshire residents work at all? Perhaps it's "65% of employed people who live in West Berkshire undertake that work in West Berkshire"? Or "65% of the West Berskhire workforce lives in West Berkshire"? Who knows?
As it's not cited, I plan to remove this text from this article and Newbury (UK Parliament constituency) where is also appears.
RichardOSmith (talk) 18:19, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Around 65% of people live and work in West Berkshire" 
Talk:Moving iron speaker

message: * Wiki categories
* Pictures, or links would be a start
* Diagrams of mechanisms
* link from other related articles
* Recordings of music on single ended, balanced armature and inductor dynamic speakers, and a bleeper reproducing speech.
Tabby (talk) 23:44, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I like the article in many respects, considering it's just begun. However, adopting my persona as an Average Reader, I have some questions. Just how does the moving iron get forced to move? Isn't it just a variation on the magnetic force causing a coil attached to a cone of some sort to move? Why are they confined to cheaper usaes today? Is it only the low quality? And it seems that whatever the motive technique, cannot the various ways of loading it acoustically be equally applied, lower quality higher distortion aside? If the article addressed these issues, I would have a clearer idea in mind of where this design approach fits in the range from piezo through voice coil to Heil to electrostatic. ww (talk) 22:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To Do

message: I come across lots of headphones, but to my knowledge, there are no current production headphones of any pedigree using moving iron transducers. The most recent moving iron transducers used for audio reproduction I've seen were 1970s era cheap earpieces, used as accessories for the transistor radios of those times.
--Rocknrollsuicide (talk) 07:06, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving Iron Headphones? 

message: it says:
 This article has multiple issues. 
 This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup reason has been specified. 
Well, if someone can be more specific about what problems exist, maybe it will be cleaned up :)
Tabby (talk) 19:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag 

message: removed dead link:
* 2"-3" diaphragm transducer and horn a very popular form of pre-war loudspeaker
Tabby (talk) 01:04, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 
Talk:Node B

message: "Power requirements on Node Bs and user equipment (UE) are much lower." This does not sound correct, as usually it is written in the news that 3G/UMTS/WCDMA (Node B) base stations run out of of battery faster because they consume more power than old GSM base stations. Also people are forcing their mobiles to 2G only to save power, because at least jumping between 2G/3G modes consumes more power, and maybe also if locked to 3G only. So is there any citations to confirm this claim in the article? --194.136.18.66 (talk) 08:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power consumption
Talk:Whispers (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine)

message: I added to the last paragraph (about the similarity to / relationship with Philip K Dick).  Added links to relevant Wikipedia page.
I'm removing it, original research. Plus its a fairly loose and weak connection. If its just similar it doesn't deserve mention, not gonna a write how James Bond is similar to whatever in every single spy article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 10:51, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Christian fiction and allegory

message: This category contradicts itself. Cristianity IS fiction so Christian fiction is then fiction's fiction?
wow,i thought that i talked in circles. if you don't believe in the Christian point of view,why are you even visiting a religious site.
i have gone to youtube to listen to -the call-from prince caspian. one person wrote to the singer that she had disgraced her Christian self by singing the song. it is a beautiful song,one that i have listened to atleast once a day since finding it.
 if the singer were dancing a jig to the song i might get upset,but she isn't. the books,movies,and music are wonderful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marygs (talk • contribs) 00:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:Casper: A Spirited Beginning

message: Where's the section for critical reception for this film? I wish someone available posted this section of the film's critical reception on this article here.
Thomas Wiencek (talk) 02:11, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no irrefutable evidence of it. DawgDeputy (talk) 20:27, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Where's the critical reception for this film?
Talk:Ma Anand Sheela

message: I'm not familiar enough with the production to add it, but wonder if this upcoming Amazon show might be worthy of including a note.--Surv1v4l1st ▌Talk|Contribs▌ 00:42, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amazon show? 

message: This article claims (with cites) she served 39 months.  This other one here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_Rajneeshee_bioterror_attack claims she served 29.  Which is it?
I was confused aswell so I found a source, Sheela served 29 months after she was sentenced Jul 1986 - Dec 1988 and 37 months in total (not 39) of Prison time from Oct 1985 - Dec 1988. --Aaron106 (talk) 00:04, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time served?
Talk:Latin boogaloo

message: I'm in the process of revising both the "boogaloo" and "Latin boogaloo" entires on Wikipedia. The term "boogaloo" should not be - as it currently is on Wikipedia - confused with the "Latin boogaloo." These two are distinct musical genres. Boogaloo began as an R&B dance fad and then was picked up by Latin musicians and turned into the Latin boogaloo (aka bugalú) but they are not identical in sound or style. What I'd like to fix is to 1) create a new Latin boogaloo page (which is what I have already done, using parts of the original Wiki page for "boogaloo") and then revise the main Wiki "boogaloo" page to reflect the term's R&B roots rather than the current conflation between the two. 
I was not aware the original page contained wording mirrored in a copyrighted source though I'm not clear if the other encyclopedia is copying Wikipedia or vice versa.
:Above written by user Soulsides in 2007 Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: It seems clear to me that there should not be two pages dealing with the same topic. Since boogaloo is a fusion between pre-salsa Cuban and soul music, the two components should not be split. Looking at the content, the two pages are essentially the same. And none of the reference books makes such a distinction. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:04, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for merger 

message: A para on doo-wop has crept in. Why is it here? Perhaps someone wanted to say Latinos also contributed to doo-wop, which they did. Details, though, can go on the doo-wop page. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:39, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  doo-wop 

message: The writing in the history section had some bias, and was not supported by refs. In particular, it was written to support the idea that boogaloo and latin boogaloo are two separate things. Which is obviously in dispute. The refs given are not full, so can't be used properly. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:13, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV cuts 

message: The above is a mirror and an unreliable source, per Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_84#New_World_Encyclopedia_is_not_a_reliable_source. For some reason, we had credited it in this article. Since NWE adjust our stuff for their own POV purposes, everything from NEW needs to go.
I cannot see an easy way out of this, while retaining genuine info added here since when ever the copy was done. Can anyone? - Sitush (talk) 03:52, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New World Encyclopedia
Talk:Vietnamese cash

message: I have deliberately to use the convention of "Đồng Tiền Thông Bảo" as opposed to "Đồng Tiền thông bảo", this has to with how these coinages are talked about in English-language sources. Generally speaking Vietnamese-language sources would use the spelling "Đồng Tiền thông bảo", "Đồng Tiền trọng bảo", "Đồng Tiền nguyên bảo", Etc. but some Vietnamese-language sources also prefer the "Đồng Tiền Thông Bảo", "Đồng Tiền Trọng Bảo", "Đồng Tiền Nguyên Bảo", Etc. spelling, meanwhile the latter spelling is universal among all the mainstream English-language sources (Barker, Daniel, Sema, Etc.). I am explaining this here in case this choice is ever questioned as I prefer to use the English-language standard for the English-language Wikipedia. --Donald Trung (talk)  08:54, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation convention for "Thông Bảo"
Talk:Frontier Corps

message: How about adding some pictures of the Frontier Corps in their distinct Black Uniform? A few pictures would be very nice.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.255.144.219 (talk) 16:38, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  can you include those in the article?--39.48.180.226 (talk) 17:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures  

message: This does NOT look like a wikipedia article at all. Contralya (talk) 00:44, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:USS Anacapa

message: Throughout the article, the ship is referred to interchangeably as Coos Bay and Anacapa. At first, I believed this to be an error, but eventually decided that the ship was built as Coos Bay and renamed Anacapa when it was commisioned in the Navy as a Q-ship. I think the article should clarify this, and then use consistent naming to minimise confusion, especially as there is another ship USS Coos Bay (AVP-25).
--Romney yw (talk) 02:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I made one minor change that might help near the end, but I think the paragraph on Construction is clear enough.  I tried to use Anacapa when describing her military career and Coos Bay when describing her civilian career because those were the names she operated under.  Please feel free to make other edits if you think it can be improved. Thanks. --Newell Post (talk) 06:55, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name confusion
Talk:South Charleston, West Virginia

message: Where is criel mound located? Does anyone know the answer to my question  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.80.39.122 (talk) 22:19, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The Mound is at 7th Ave and D Street.  SimpsonDG (talk) 20:30, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question 

message: South Charleston was incorporated in 1917, not 1919 as the article indicates.  I won't bother changing it -- some wiki-bully would just come along and revert my edits, so I'll leave the error in place. SimpsonDG (talk) 20:32, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold, my friend.  Wiki-bullies like all other bullies win to our detriment when good men and women do not stand up to them.  Please review my recent edits and revert or revise as you see fit. Cheers! Sandcherry (talk) 12:40, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorporation Date 

message: Please see Talk:Criel_Mound#Date_of_Construction.  Date needs to be changed according to whatever is decided there. --David Tornheim (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mound construction date
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Zealand Railways/Manual of style

message: I've put up a multi-page move request on NZR DL class. --LJ Holden 00:01, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed this to "New Zealand xx class locomotive" --LJ Holden 22:38, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multi-page request 

message: Some time ago the Auckland railway station articles were unilaterally renamed to use the Railway Station nomenclature as is standard with the other New Zealand railway station articles.  While this isn't wrong, per se, it is inconsistent with this project's MOS which states Auckland has Train Stations.  If no-one has any objections, I'll modify the appropriate section to make it clear that all New Zealand stations are Railway Stations (with the rare exception like Britomart) and in the Auckland case to encourage the creation of a Train Station redirect to the Railway Station article for users searching by the MAXX nomenclature. — Matthew25187 (talk) 01:46, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auckland station names 

message: Please see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Australasian stations). Based on existing station naming. Useddenim (talk) 04:07, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming conventions (Australasian stations)
Talk:Grove Christmas Tree

message: Is this tree one live tree? A composite of real trees put togehter in the shape of one tree? Or one fake tree? I have no idea. Anyone? Xdeserted (talk) 01:18, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mason Raige

message: I've redacted the birth name and the birth year of the wrestler in question per request from the subject of the article himself, per the requirements of WP:BLP. Said e-mail has been forwarded to OTRS for archiving. Tabercil (talk) 00:12, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Real name & birth age
Talk:Rivington Arms

message: A google search shows the gallery exhibiting from 2003 at least, and booked in for 2008. Tyrenius (talk) 04:19, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Armory Show refs

message: See google search. Tyrenius (talk) 04:40, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New York Times refs
Talk:Smooth morphism

message: This is not yet defined in the glossary!--129.70.14.128 (talk) 01:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

message: The definition of "geometric point" appearing in the glossary requires that the scheme in question be defined over a field. What is the appropriate definition in the general case? 98.243.172.55 (talk) 19:23, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A geometric point of X is \operatorname{Spec}(k) \to X where k is a separably closed field. -- Taku (talk) 14:17, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Geometric point" 

message: This page should discuss examples of smooth morphisms
* trivial fibrations
* Hirzebruch surfaces over \mathbb{P}^1
* scrolls
* vector bundles
* smooth locus of flat families
* etale morphisms
and non-examples, such as
* families of singular varieties
* singular variety over a point
* blowups  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.122.75.155 (talk) 17:31, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples Needed 

message: This page should discuss how to find the smooth locus of a morphism of schemes X \to S.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.122.75.155 (talk) 05:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this is a version of Bertini's theorem (no question it's an important thing to cover). -- Taku (talk) 23:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smooth Locus of Families
Talk:Musikvergnuegen

message: i see no problem with the article... it simply states what musikvergnuegen's main accomplishments have been - if it were to be spam it seems that the spam would be advertising something more??? musikvergnuegen was the composer of the intel theme, which i found out after much research and calling online, it is not listed at their website as it's main achievement but it seems that it was put here from someone that cared to have the info there in the first place. removing this article would be detrimental to purpose of wiki's everywhere.
Hafler03 (talk) 01:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:PC-7 Team

message: On the 19,20,21 Jun the PC-7 Team peforms as first Air Diplay Team flying display programm in symbiosis with a live playing (military) music band and not music from the tap.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8kW1cdiVuA&feature=em-uploademailhttp://www.pc7-team.ch/de/
The reference is not just a pilot! Its the Commander of the PC-7Team (Who is also a pilot but not only, also its the speaker of the PC-7 Tem (who is not a pilot , who is a Military skyguide Air Traffic Controller, and the conductor of the Swiss Miltary Band... also this can be found on the PC-7 Team Homepage. Its very bad and disapointing how  here topics  about swiss air force teams are cencored  so much.FFA P-16 (talk) 17:58, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I know you are deeply in love with the Swiss Air Force but not every hiccup is relevant. The Banner talk 03:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  informations about PC-7 Team
Talk:Piel Castle

message: I've gone through and given the article a thorough scrub - everything should have inline citations now etc. I've been bold and switched the lead image - this one seemed to get in more detail of the castle itself. Hchc2009 (talk) 16:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion... 

message: While putting together the article on Gleaston Castle the architectural similarity in using one type of stone as the main building material while picking out details in another (both using red sandstone) stuck out. It's perhaps a small point but is it worth adding a short mention of the link? Richard Nevell (talk) 17:46, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Does Newman draw out the comparison? There's potentially a slight risk of OR here... Hchc2009 (talk) 19:51, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just rechecked Contrebis (the source used) as well as TCWAAS (1 and 2) and she doesn't actually mention Gleaston. Best to leave out then? Richard Nevell (talk) 20:10, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably... although there's no doubt an academic article to be written about how builders of the period chose which stone to use for the main walls and detailing etc. - seems to have moved in fashions. Hchc2009 (talk) 17:00, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross-referencing the article on [[Gleaston Castle]]
Talk:MediGuard

message: I removed the following paragraph from the article as being WP:OR:
:Additionally, the colors are misordered. Using the colors of the rainbow as a guide, the order should be: red, orange, yellow, green, then blue. Because Americans have traditionally used "green" to mean "safe to proceed" (e.g. in traffic signaling) green was designated the lowest level. In the alternative, green-yellow could have been used instead of blue.
Please only re-add this information if a third-party is cited making this criticism. Aleta Sing 19:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: I stumbled upon this web-site while editing the side effects section of the Copaxone article.
According to the web-site of this company, iGuard.org has changed its name to MediGuard. 
I suggest that the name of the article would be changed to MediGuard and a redirect page from
iGuard to MediGuard would be added. ערן78 (talk) 13:00, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  iGuard is now MediGuard