lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tough Crowd with Colin Quinn

message: I've just added a paragraph (that is hopefully NPOV) regarding the amount of promotion and network support received by the show.  Sadly, I can't figure out how to usefully cite this, because I don't know of anywhere I can find data on promos aired, etc., and can't find any credible articles which reference this.  My source for this is watching Comedy Central myself and noting the difference in promotion between the two shows, and the cited blog entries.  Other Tough Crowd fans have also noted this, but I can't really cite forum posts as fact.  If anyone can provide any data to help back this up, that'd be great. --ndc 20:11, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed a large text dump from an anon editor which was the source of  most (all?) of the NPOV.  Gamaliel 06:55, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  gamaliel, you truly made a mistake. it is an analysis of basic facts of the network and subsequent shows, there is nothing POV in saying that Carlos Mencia is similar to Tough Crowd
I took the bit about what "Critics" said on the show.  There is no reference given nor indication of who these "critics" were and where they said what was in that section.--GenkiDama 22:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Now here this, all editors:  Comedy Central has NOT aired TCWCQ since 2004.  It has NEVER made ANY of the episodes available on DVD or otherwise.  Take a look on Comedy Central's website.  It has ERASED TCWCQ from its' history.  Therefore, it is well within the right to post links to online copies of TCWCQ, which incidentally, are in very poor quality, due to the fact that they were taped off t.v., when they originally aired.  There is no online record of the episodes, that I have been able to find, therefore, the video links to the episodes are the ONLY way of documenting which comedians were on each episode.  And having said that, there are still many episodes which I have not been able to locate.  The links to 2 video playlists, which are located in External Links, are very important to TCWCQ's wikipedia entry.  If Comedy Central ever decides to make a profit off of TCWCQ and releases the episodes either on DVD, or on its' own website, then it is perfectly understandable to remove these 2 video playlists off of wikipedia.  I hope they DO release the episodes on DVD! I would buy it! But until then, please leave the 2 video playlists in this article alone, so that people can see for themselves what this show was all about.  Again, there is NO OTHER WAY of documenting the panels of comedians, who were on each episode.  Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebluenun (talk • contribs) 20:55, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter how long its been since the show was aired or if it was released on DVD or if its on the website; the copyright still stands and is legally enforceable, which means we cannot link to material that violates that here.  Any/all of your points being true would not negate the legality of copyrighted material.  DP76764 (Talk) 21:15, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright discussion
Talk:Emma Thompson

message: Her father was 53 years old when he died.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.34.211 (talk) 13:01, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of father's death 

message: :Where would this go?  And when? 
"Johnny English Strikes Again" (2018) 
:https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/video/johnny-english-strikes-again-trailer-1100100
::https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/johnny_english_strikes_again_2018/
:Cast: Rowan Atkinson as Johnny English; Olga Kurylenko as Ophelia; Ben Mille as Bough; Jake Lacy as Jason; Emma Thompson as Prime Minister; Adam James as Pegasus; Ben Miller as Bough; David Mumeni as Fabian;  -- AstroU (talk) 15:03, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starring role coming, October 2018 

message: In the article, Thompson is described as "the first female member" of the Cambridge Footlights. The Footlights article, however, names Germaine Greer as the first female member. Which is accurate? - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 03:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Eleanor Bron and Jo Kendall participated in Footlights productions several years before Greer attended.  Bill321 (talk) 04:07, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: So is the Footlights article itself in error? Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 17:13, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footlights 

message: It would be nice to have a filmography list on this like most actors of her stature have. Azikqua (talk) 05:28, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes! Where's the usual list of movies, stage, and TV work that we usually have for actors of her stature? Pascalulu88 (talk) 23:12, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography
Talk:Valdecoxib

message: I, Hitesh Chavda, P.G.student from India want to know the standard curve of valecoxib.
Can you give few information about this curve.
:Please ask the reference desk. JFW | T@lk 13:18, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: Folkes,
If I am not mistaken the heterocyclic moiety of Bextra should be an "Isoxazol". 
Can somebody rectify this?
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chzapf (talk • contribs) 
:Corrected. Thank you for noticing. Fvasconcellos 15:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  nomenclature 

message: Currently the article goes into quite a bit of detail about the legal issues related to off-label promotion.  This content is not really about valdecoxib - there were several drugs involved, not just valdecoxib.  This section is much more relevant to the pharmaceutical companies involved/  I feel that it could be mentioned here, but not in such detail that it dominates the article text as it does now.  It should be trimmed considerably.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:34, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A new article should created for this court case because it's about more than one drug. None of the info should be deleted though until the new article is created. It actually needs to be expanded because it's unclear exactly what Pfizer did. Mr G (talk) 03:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009 settlement
Talk:Élie-Abel Carrière

message: The IPNI website lists the author abbrev. as "Carrière" but this article previously had it as "Carr." - I can't confirm who "Carr." belongs to so I can't entirely negative this claim (IPNI claims there is no "Carr." but there is a completely different "Carr"). VivaEmilyDavies 07:41, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Reg (online slang)

message: "They are sometimes rude to newbies, but others are welcoming towards them."
Is this really true? Regardless, is it really an appropriate statement for an encyclopaedic article?
Also, I saw the word "reg" and immediately thought "register", rather than "regular". Perhaps the article should include that definition as well.
--TheParanoidOne 08:02, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:The Story of Art

message: Is this article really needed? All of the content is on the author E. H. Gombrich's page already? Teapotgeorge 15:36, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is a new born baby needed? Greg Bard (talk) 20:09, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needed? 

message: https://entertainment.time.com/2011/08/30/all-time-100-best-nonfiction-books/slide/the-story-of-art-by-e-h-gombrich/.--DonGuess (talk) 22:12, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists 

message: — Assignment last updated by Gtej05 (talk) 13:05, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: WRIT 015-13, Writing for Others

message: I am planning on making some changes to the article in the coming weeks. First, I plan on rewriting the summary section to be better organized and more informative. I will also be adding a background section, drawing from articles about the book and interviews with the author to bring the article closer to Wikipedia’s recommendations for articles about books. I will also be adding a reception section for the same purpose, drawing from contemporary and modern-day reviews of the book, and within this section, I will include criticisms of the book. I will also add a brief style section, as this book has substantial commentary on its style. This is also in Wikipedia’s recommendations for articles about books. Gtej05 (talk) 14:13, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Plans for edits
Talk:Right hand grip rule

message: Both this page and Right-hand rule say they're "related, yet different", but not how so. In my opinion, the RHGR is just an instance of the RHR, and that should be made clear. But maybe someone had a different view of the RHGR, as it's described as "a physics principle" (which doesn't fit the "rule" part). Would be nice if someone cleared this up. 134.130.4.46 02:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge this with Right-hand rule. Duh! • Q^#o • 00:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Penalty shootout

message: I am surprised, and appalled, that this article does not mention fan resistance to the shootout format in the various leagues when it was introduced. I know that shootouts are a fact of life now in many leagues, but some hint of the strong feelings and intense debate at the time of adoption should be noted. 165.91.64.118 (talk)RKH  —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:18, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really see the point of this new page. It seems to only duplicate existing information. The majority (in fact all it seems) of links to "penalty shootout" refer to football/soccer, and they may as well go straight to the source of correct information provided at kicks from the penalty mark. If we are concerned that the term penalty shootout is applied to hockey, then a disambiguation page would be better.   --Daveb 01:47, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: Fair enought, however the information looks a little too specific for a general concept / disambig page. Cheers, --Daveb 08:39, 10 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: controversy

message: Continuing to call this feature a "penalty shootout" is a really bad idea, because it has nothing to do with penalties. It just got that name early on because the implementation was often derived from penalty shots/kicks/throws as used the the particular sport.  It really ought to be called "game tiebreaker" or something similar. WHPratt (talk) 14:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad name for the concept
Talk:Ping An of China

message: SchmuckyTheCat could you please stick with the naming conventions? In this edit, you wrote " Ping An Insurance Overseas, located in Hong Kong, is a second holding company for subsidiary companies located outside of China. " and implied Hong Kong not part of China.
Ping An's operation in Hong Kong and Macao is through Ping An Overseas, but you wrote " Ping An has operations across all of the People's Republic of China (instead of "mainland China"), and in Hong Kong and Macau through Ping An Insurance Overseas. Ping An has branches or a representative agent in 150 countries. ".
It is an insurance companies of mainland China, but you remove it from that category.  — Instantnood 08:27, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
*What country is it incorporated in? the PRC. SchmuckyTheCat 14:49, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Political NPOV and naming conventions

message: Somehow this should be linked with Ping An Insurance. That's their brand name, so it might be a more sensible choice for the main article; compare HSBC. I don't know how to do this though. Matt 09:17, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur with the merger; the other article is only 2 lines long.  I'll be marking the categories with a merger flag.  If a 3rd editor concurs, go ahead and do it.  :) 2*6 09:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Merge and explain the distinction within that article. Wayyyy down the road, it might even be worth spliting if gets too big...--Gkklein 16:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article merger?
Talk:ANSYS (version 2)

message: I vote against merging the two articles.  "ANSYS" should discuss the software package, and "ANSYS, Inc." should discuss the company.
--Smack (talk) 00:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Prater

message: There are multiple Praters, this one is in Vienna. "Wiener" is German and we should use English, therefore request move. Gryffindor 23:06, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. I disagree; I see no problem having German words in English encyclopædia titles, so I think "Wiener Prater" is a better title than "Prater, Vienna". A second point: the Viennese Prater is by far the commonest usage of "Prater" (which currently redirects there). The Wikimedia Commons category "Prater" refers solely to Vienna, for instance. If you really can't live with "Wiener Prater", then move it to "Prater", and create a "Prater (disambiguation)", if necessary, to link to any other articles that may be created about other Praters. --Stemonitis 10:28, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I've moved it to Prater. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 06:32, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Java coffee

message: "Since the late 1990s, they may be playing off the popular Java programming language."
I question the validity of this statement. I highly doubt that the typicial coffee house owner/patron will know about the programming language. If "Java" has been added to the name of a coffee house, I imagine it's because it's a coffee type, rather than a programming language.
--TheParanoidOne 10:00, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, who dreamt this one up? Jackliddle 13:24, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programming language namesake 

message: I've removed two commercial links from the references section. The first one (to www.cw-usa.com), was a pretty easy choice. Although it had some real information, it was clearly  promotional in nature. The second one (merdekacoffee.com) was slightly less clear cut. Although there was some nice reference information for Java coffee, it still was somewhat promotional in nature, and the link was directly to the site's front page. I'm going to try to look around this weekend for some non-commercial references to replace what I removed. ScottW 22:35, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial links 

message: I found, Googling, 
: about 68,500 for "mocha java" coffee.
and 
: about 4,340 for "mocca java" coffee. 
but in the 1 sent of the 5th of the 6 'graphs
: This coffee is prized as one component in the traditional "Mocca Java" blend, which pairs coffee from Yemen and Java. 
and no reference that could support the spelling. Our article Mocha, Yemen documents that city as the origin of the name of the coffee variety, and it has Mocha City, Mokha, and Mukha as redirects.  (Mocca is Rdr to the TopHat-Dab'd article on an Indonesian band, and Mocca (disambiguation) comes closest to coffee (only via the band!) in the sense that Indonesia is traditionally associated with coffee. The problems with the Dab and Rdr are off-topic here.) I've converted it to what i (and Google) expected to find; if we're wrong, let's have some kind of evidence for what i've removed.--Jerzy•t 15:48, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mocha vs Mocca
Talk:Black Wind (Cussler novel)

message: Just started the article for Black Wind. It could use a scan of the front cover if anyone can put one up. --Toric 10:10, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: someone has done this :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 15:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Front Cover
Talk:Vladislas II of Hungary

message: This article states in the end that his daughter by Anne de Foix, Anne born 1503 married by Imperial Marriage Contract, Ferdinand of Austria. This hyperlink goes to Ferdinand of Austria Born 1793, 290 "Years" after her?
see Technical Writing-Fourth edition by Shanron J. Gerson and Steven M Gerson>R.M.
: It was wrongly linked, both Ferdinand and Maximilian. I've updated the links now, thanks for the note. --Joy [shallot] 13:58, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would like to add the following towards the bottom of the article, to help address some confusion about the name.  Is this acceptable? --Elonka 00:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation note

message: Do the coronation date and the wedding/marriage date occur on the same day with European aristocracy? I ask because I am adding the coronation date for his 3rd marriage but I don't know offhand if that corresponds to the wedding date. Since I know the date of her coronation, I would prefer to write it as their marriage date, but I don't know how aristocratic traditions work in this period or for that matter most any other period. Does anyone know? Can you please provide an answer to this question? Thank you... Steve Stevenmitchell (talk) 11:29, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Coronation date vs. Wedding date

message: The content of the two articles has now been merged under Vladislaus II of Bohemia and Hungary.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 16:05, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of two articles
Talk:Native POSIX Thread Library

message: Who is Edward Rice? Where is this research? If it isn't available to be read anywhere, why is it referenced in this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NPTL entry. Also, if the research isn't available or is known to be faulty why is it still referenced? Considering these comments I believe it to be a better idea to remove the paragraph and wait for a decent study comparing LinuxThreads to NPTL which is more useful than a comparison to another Operating System.
Thanks,
Christopher Warner--64.61.118.58 15:31, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Who is Edward Rice?

message: Added a handy test for determining version from the command line (common knowledge). Also, I did some research on threading performance for Dr. Dobbs Magazine in May or June, and could add that in when I regain complete copyright. Big advantage is in thread creation; small advantage in handling thread contention.
--Bluejack
I tested the 'getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION' utility on a Redhat system and it returned: NPTL 2.3.4.  Interestingly enough, rpm -qa | grep nptl indicates that the system has the nonptl versions of many libraries installed.  The nptl libraries in /usr/lib/nptl do not exist on this system so it appears that the system defaults to using Linux threads.  I question the validity of the getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION test to determine whether NPTL is really supported on a system. --RandomTask
The system is either using NPTL or it is not. This depends on the way GlibC is compiled, it's one or the other, as there is no fallback system. So you should not need to question if it is really supported or not. Christopher Warner
: glibc is compiled twice, once for NPTL and once for LinuxThreads. The NPTL libs are installed to lib/tls and used by default. EdC 07:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Added a handy test

message: The test mentioned in the text is from 2002. I think it should be removed and replaced by more up-to-date info if that is to be had. --MarSch 09:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  test with 100.000 threads 

message: The 13:30, 12 November 2008 Lightbot version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia.--Wing (talk) 12:13, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation into Chinese Wikipedia 

message: The pdf document linked in the article (http://people.redhat.com/drepper/nptl-design.pdf) has the following disclaimer:
This document is completely, utterly out of date when it comes
to descriptions of the limitations of the current implementation.
Everybody referring to this document to document shortcomings
of NPTL is either a moron who hasn’t done her/his homework
and researched the issue, or is deliberately misleading people as
it happens too often with publications done by the Evil from the
North-West.
QBasicer (talk) 00:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Out Of Date
Talk:Garmin Forerunner

message: What's the model of the GPS chip in the new Forerunner 405? Anyone know?--169.233.102.41 (talk) 17:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chip in 405? 

message: The sentense "The watch uses the hh.mm.mmmm (hours, minutes, and minute decimals) coordinate format." should be changed to The watch uses the hh.mm.mmmm (DEGREES, minutes, and minute decimals) coordinate format.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.4.16.229 (talk) 10:20, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: Why does the timeline start in 2010?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by -Deus Ex Machina- (talk • contribs) 07:50, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline 

message: Someone may wish to edit this blurb, a single contribution by one account.
Cheers, Bansp (talk) 03:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  745 advertising blurb 

message: Forerunner 955 does not have the solar charging ring and capability 161.69.101.128 (talk) 19:37, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forerunner 955 does not have the solar charging ring and capability
Talk:Arab word

message: I've done a few web-searches on this... The only traceable references to Arab Word that I could find were references to the Arabic-language version of Microsoft Word. One might think that if there is or was an independent Arab Word program that was for some time the primary Arabic word processor, it should be quite easy to find on the web. Given the content of the article, I would suggest that this article be deleted if noone can rewrite this article (citing a full list of sources). Shinobu 11:32, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Atlas Autocode

message: Is this still a stub? Shinobu 11:36, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's got a bit of info but its lacking any inline citations. Jwoodger (talk) 00:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub?

message: I need to check this, but the 1965 date for AA seems rather late.  AA was designed by Tony as his response to the early Algol discussions (what I believe was informally referred to as "ALGOL 58") and was being designed and implemented in parallel with Algol60.
Later note: See https://www.chilton-computing.org.uk/acl/technology/atlas50th/p002.htm - the language was designed by 1962, and was running in 1963. I'll update the main page to say 1963.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.124.38.160 (talk) 04:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline

message: *"Passing by Name" in Algol60. In the versions I used (Elliott Algol for the 803 and 903) I'm almost certain that "calling by name" which was the default condition if a formal parameter to a procedure or function was not declared as "value", meant that the address of the actual parameter was passed into the subroutine and the actual parameter manipulated. This meant that any changes would persist after the routine exited. I.e. it gave rise to side-effects. It was valuable if a large array or matrix was being manipulated, since in avoided copying the whole thing onto the stack which a "call by value" would involve. OTOH, a call by value ensured that the routine could not change the value of the actual parameter, a copy was made on the stack which was local to the routine and vanished on exit. I think therefore that the comment in the text here is mistaken, and should certainly be checked out. Mongvras (talk) 20:21, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Passing by name

message: The last year in which Manchester University students were taught AA was around 1971/72.  Students in Electrical Engineering had AA included as part of their syllabus 2.24.25.78 (talk) 12:34, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programming in Atlas autocode