lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tenko and the Guardians of the Magic

message: You know what...although I don't have an S-Video Out card for my PC, I do remember recording an actual episode of the show. I have seen thit somewhere in the mid to late 1990's. In my tape collection, I only have one episode recorded and the tape I got is from that era. I haven't watched it in a long time, but I think I have the only remaining recording of the show left. --Seishirou Sakurazuka 02:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I noticed that the page that this page is suggested to be merged with does not exist. I think there is a msitake here.03:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge request question 

message: Perhaps some more knowledgeable editor can verify and add the following to the article: The series initially began with a special preview hosted by Amy Jo Johnson.  In this preview (which I recorded on VHS but now considered lost amid a collection of 175+ eight-hour tapes), Amy is invited to princess Tenko in a magician's club but instead encounters several other famous magicians.  Amid the tricks that Amy participates in and behind-the-scenes footage of is animated production, the disembodied voice of princess tenko encourages Amy to continue exploring the magicians club to find her.  All of this from memory and I might be off on a few details.--Kenn Caesius 22:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Preview" addition

message: I added this to the anime cat as part of the categorization project, but was not able to spend time to figure out a good subcat.  Sorry Scarykitty 22:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Categoriziation
Talk:100 (DC Comics)

message: Your changes have been brought to the attention of WikiProject Comics, you can plead your case on the project discussion page here.
*Get over it: what I did wasn't wrong. I explained this at the Wikiproject Comics page, and I will explain it here..since you didn't respond to it. 
I change something, and I get put on a watch list?  That's stupid. I changed it twice, and the second time I explained why it didn't need to be on that page. Then I'm added to a watch list, and a page I'm working on is listed... for no reason at all. I didn't remove the link on the 100 page just to promote the page I'm working on (as you can obviously see, I NEVER once added the link to the villain page to the 100 page). So that's not the case, if that's what you are guessing at or whatever.
And furthermore, just because you edit a page a lot (I checked the 100 history, and saw you have edited it quite a lot since May), doesn't mean you own the page. Either accept some edits of a page you work on, or don't be on Wiki. Lastly, the little edit comment in your latest 100 revert was immature and not needed.
::That list is a guarantee of your future good behavior. I protect a lot of pages including this one. --Basique 02:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever, it was just plain rude. The page can't remain how you want it alwaud, it's just not possible. Let change happen, or even more people will be upset. RobJ1981 03:42, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: User:RobJ1981

message: http://www.supermanartists.comics.org/silverage/100-JusticeLeague084-02.jpg
see this scan
11:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Actually first seen in JLA#84

message: It's a good start, although it needs rewriting from an out of universe and literary present perspective.  Needs more referencing and needs to explain itself better.  More than a stub, but not clear enough to be B-class as yet. Hiding Talk 20:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:John Patrick Looney

message: There seems to be some discrepancy in the date of death.  This page cites a source as saying 1942, however other sites (like this one), citing same / similar sources, indicate he died in 1947.  I don't have access to these sources, but maybe someone with access can review.
Ton Phanan (talk) 16:58, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Death

message: The referenced Rothbart article says he was born as Patrick John Looney.  Is there any authority for listing Patrick second?  In any event, he was known as John Looney and perhaps the article should be retitled without the other name. Kestenbaum 03:01, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Doctor Mist

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:21, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required
Talk:Isaiah Bradley

message: Is there a source for the claim that this was an attempt to *recreate* Cap's serum and Cap already existed at the time? Ken Arromdee 18:58, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recreate 

message: I've heard that Marvel is no longer able to use Bradley or any of his family as a result of a legal dispute between them and Robert Morales' estate. Does anyone know if this is true or not?
-- MidnightSoldier (talk) 17:22, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Legal Issues
Talk:International Ultramarine Corps

message: I've removed the trivia section formt he article, as uncited info doesn't need to be inthe article. I someone can find a good (read: reliable and verifiable) citation for the statements, we can put them back in with the citations. Otherwise, they cannot return to the article. 
:::::Trivia
:::::*It is thought by some that the Corps are a pastiche or parody of such politically extreme superhuman groups as The Authority and The Ultimates. Certainly their most recent appearance in JLA: Classified conforms to this theory although it was less prevalent a theme in their earlier appearances. One further theory suggests that this most recent appearance specifically parodies The Ultimates.
- Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:02, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Section
Talk:Pouched lamprey

message: This article seems written as if the primary information about the species is its relation to NZ.  Given the stated wide distribution of the species, this emphasis seems undue.  Unless there is substantive opposition, I will begin in a few days to re-write the article to remove the NZ bias. - Nick Thorne talk 01:28, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NZ emphasis
Talk:Folding Circle

message: I'm not sure how to fix it but I -know- that an RPG website is not good enough for Wikipedia links. The stats are not official Marvel stats. Heck, official Marvel stats (Marvel Handbook) are very rarely allowed on Wikipedia. Lots42 (talk) 02:32, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The references 
Talk:Golden perch

message: Is "freshes" really a word, it is used quite often like in here "Golden perch have a flexible breeding strategy but generally need a spring or summer flood or "fresh" to stimulate spawning. Like most primarily lowland native fish species of the Murray–Darling river system, these floods or freshes appear to be necessary for good survival and recruitment of spawned fish." A search on google or wikipedia doesn't reveal anything either. Is it jargon, if so could someone change the word?
:The word "fresh" is commonly used in Australia amongst those working in and recreational users of our inland waterways.  It refers to the effect of a sudden influx of freshwater usually but not exclusively from rainfall far upstream of the location in question.  It is a highly descriptive and appropriate word to use to describe the sudden change in water quality that occurs when these events occur, typically water temperature drops, oxygen levels rise, and salinity drops.  A "fresh" is usually followed by a period of increased productivity and many species time their breeding to take avantage of this. Nick Thorne 11:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Freshes

message: *It is not correct to state that Australian conditions are challenging, in some places it is anything but, however it is correct that it is often challenging.
*"that ensures that" seems clumsy so I changed the first that to which.
*Maximum recorded age is 26 years, and will remain so until someone finds a fish that is older than 26 years.  Think about it this way - if it was 26 years, then what is it now?
Nick Thorne 11:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammer

message: This is wrong.   Golden perch are the Percichthyidae family.  Seems difficult to fix though.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.47.132.150 (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You are completely correct.  Looks like something wrong with the template, I'll see if I can find somebody to help fix this. - Nick Thorne talk 01:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have manually corrected the family in this and the other species of Maquaria.  I cannot understand why the template gives the incorrect info automatically, as far as I can tell the info at each taxonomic level is correct.  Weird. - Nick Thorne talk 02:25, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is golden perch showing as being in Scienidae family??? 
Talk:Josiah X

message: The lost tribe of Shabazz and replacing slave-names with "X" are Nation of Islam beliefs and practices, not Muslim. 71.131.223.238
This is simply a mistake on the writer's part. Josiah X is a muslim, becoming one in Africa.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.69.200.75 (talk) 12:12, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muslim? 
Talk:Australasian Intervarsity Debating Championships

message: If you know what institutions won or hosted in the early years, feel free to fill in the gaps of the tables. Cheers, Jpeob 03:08, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Removing this citation from the page as the archived versions also give "Sorry, this story is no longer available."
  Jay (Talk) 07:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link from stuff.co.nz
Talk:Mountain galaxias (species complex)

message: This species has been divided into a complex of fifteen species, per Raadik 2014.  I intend on re-writing this page as the complex page, first copying the contents to a new page Galaxias olidus which I will then edit to reflect the change and then linking to the current other two members of the group G. fuscus and G. ornatus and creating stubs for the other members of the group.  Eventually I hope to expand those pages into at least start class pages. - Nick Thorne talk 11:41, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species complex
Talk:Francisco Liriano

message: The second paragraph needs to be re written, it is somewhat biased and does not resemble an encyclopedia entry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BDNYanks021 (talk • contribs) 04:11, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: It just seems a little tacky.  Are these really milestones yet?  What if he goes 3-8 the rest of the way?  Are there any guidelines for what should be noted? AlanzoB 17:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't feel strongly either way, but the game against the Astros was nationally televised, and there were a lot of enthusiastic articles about Liriano afterward. I doubt he would have made the all-star game without the TV exposure. --Akhilleus (talk) 05:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Please rework the last game in the "Notable Games" section. Present tense isn't good for an encyclopedia article. 198.176.160.10 15:48, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Games Section 

message: The deal is official now 67.86.57.10 (talk) 19:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it isn't. The latest MLB source clearly states that the trade is pending confirmation by the Jays and Astros. Trut-h-urts man (T • C)  19:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

text: Not done: per above. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 19:56, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 July 2017
Talk:Lepidogalaxias

message: I just reverted another move of this article (this time it was to Salamanderfish of Western Australia).  Obviously there is at least potential controversy associated with moving this article from its current name.  As such, please make suggestions and check for consensus before moving the article.  Thank you.  --Born2cycle (talk) 00:43, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What was wrong with my rationale? cygnis insignis 00:52, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Cygnis insignis, try to ignore that bait.  Given there is disagreement, use WP:RM.  You have plenty of evidence to support a request for whatever move you decide is best.  I might accept Salamanderfish (Western Australia), or Salamanderfish (Lepidogalaxias) but, given the results of my quick search of reliable sources, my preference would be the scientific name:  since it is monotypic, Lepidogalaxias.  --Una Smith (talk) 06:22, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the sensible contribution to this discussion. The 'evidence' is in the article's content, where it might be useful. Debate on the specious naming given to their referents, largely unproductive or disruptive, will always becomes mired in trivialities like spacing, cp. mud minnow and mudminnow. I'm trying to focus on editing the sources to include the interesting characteristics not mentioned, the energy and time expended here could have been focused on content, but I will point out that they all use Lepidogalaxias salamandroides or Lepidogalaxiidae as the referent to their version of common name. They nearly all use it for a title. A source without one of these names could not be used, our encyclopedic (stub) article is about a species with a valid name. I suppose in current wikitalk user's parlance this would be called the 'primary' name, the universal name should be the default at the very least. My rationale in my edit summary was found by checking the offline source of the only other recent contribution to the content. I will leave it that editor to explain how p.109 of his source supports his edit, and not his POV. As for wikilawyering sots, with no interest in the articles improvement, using the move function in a broad and unfocused vendetta - well - "so it it goes". I doubt they can be bothered reading an article here or elsewhere, just relentless war mongering. Google helps to find evidence, it is not a nomenclator, how earth would I cite a ghit count? cygnis insignis 07:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  revert to Salamanderfish from "Salamanderfish of Western Australia"
Talk:Tasmanian mudfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 02:46, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Trout cod

message: To persons recently changing this page's contents: please do not do so UNLESS you have read/examined ALL of the historical evidence concerning trout cod (which I very much doubt you have).  Such historical evidence makes it very clear the trout cod's primary habitat was upland river habitats, all of which are now heavily dominated by introduced trout species.  As unpalatable as it is to some angling groups and fisheries departments, this fact must be accepted, recognised and researched to take trout cod conservation forward successfully.  Codman 05:33, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added tags as this article is not fully referenced and contains some text which reflects personal opinions and is therefore not encyclopaedic.Quetzal1964 (talk) 08:43, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page modifications
Talk:Bruce Seldon

message: It was alleged in the early 1990's that nobody had heard of Bruce Seldon, but that was only because nobody wanted to. You could ask Tony Tucker about Bruce Seldon, made his face look like a hamburger. Joe Hipp, too.
---hahahahaha!!!! I remember these adds.  I was like, "why is Tyson hyping up Seldon?".
cried like a woman?
this article doesn't really seem neutral..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.157.88 (talk) 03:32, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please look at the following line:
*It was after a boxing match between Seldon and Mike Tyson that Tupac Shakur was murdered in a drive-by shooting.
Is it totally necessary to include this trivial information that is of no significance to the subject and his notability included in the lede? Evlekis (Евлекис) 21:17, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: All I said was he was a fluid moving fighter with good handspeed and a body builders physique and this was removed for some reason as vandalism. It's just a description of Seldon and I think it helps given that the image is not when he is practicing his profession as a fighter.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.77.153.197 (talk) 13:18, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added some stuff on Seldon
Talk:Racial segregation in the United States

message: There's a paragraph in Section 3: Racism that states Black soldiers were used for suicide missions in WW1, there's no citation to back up such an assertion, and the only evidence I can find of Black combat units in WW1 were the 92nd and 93rd infantry, both commanded by the French who treated them equally to their own units. In fact the only citations in that paragraph, (citations 44 and 45) suggest both units were well respected by their French commanders. May I suggest such an inflammatory comment be removed until further evidence is found to support it? - Chris  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:503C:A400:E805:C7C9:F9B6:62AC (talk) 18:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this was a while ago but I totally agree and removed the comment. It is completely unmentioned by any of the cited sources and I removed it.  Foward123456 (talk) 20:51, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide Missions - not backed up? 

message: Why does the history section begin with Reconstruction? Are Wikipedia readers to believe that segregation began during Reconstruction? FloridaArmy (talk) 04:07, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: — Assignment last updated by Isha0323 (talk) 19:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Black American Music
Talk:Celebritarian Corporation

message: It would be good if the CC's logo was present at the top of the page. --Jimmyjrg 07:39, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images of cross 

message: This article is in a pretty bad state to the point that I am starting to thinking there is no real point to it. Who agrees it should be merged in to Marilyn Manson (person)? Obviously lots of the 'information' would be cut as it isn't relevent.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimmyjrg (talk • contribs) 
:I totally agree. This tells me next to nothing relevant about it. We would want to know everything about it. Merge or delete.--Wokid MM 01:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't there already a discussion opened up about this somewhere?Yeago 14:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Article with Marilyn Manson (person) 

message: =) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yeago (talk • contribs) 17:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  yet another go-nowhere manson sideproject
Talk:Dimitri from Paris

message: So exactly why isn't place of birth good enough for you? ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cause i find it confusing... If someone was born in Italy, of Greek mother and Russian father, then moved to France and now lives in the UK, would he/she be included in 5 categories? --Hectorian 03:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Determining whether or not Dmitri would be considered Turkish
Talk:Marinera

message: Why was this article moved? The Spanish article is only at ":es:Marinera". This is an article for all styles. It should probably be moved back.- AKeen 03:36, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why was Marinera moved to Marinera Norteña?

message: The article says:
"The former name of the dance was "chilena" due to the friendly situations between the two nations , but due to the hostile situation, in a patriotic moment, it was agreed to be renamed."
The former name is not due to "friendly situations between the two nations" but to the similarity and relationship between the marinera and the chilean national dance, the "cocoa".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.22.187.113 (talk) 19:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chilena 

message: I'm confused ! Should that be a link ? Or has the article been renamed to the very thing it is not to be confused with ? Disambiguation ?
--195.137.93.171 (talk) 21:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marinera - Not to be confused with Marinera. 

message: In three out of the four pictures in the articles, the male dancer is on a horse. Is it typical of this dance ? It seems a bit weird that it is not discussed anywhere. Hidodu (talk) 15:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horses ?
Talk:Ray Mercer

message: Does anyone have a reliable reference for Mercer's military service.  I've found conflicting references that say he served in the Marines and in the Army.  — ERcheck (talk) 00:36, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military service? 

message: STOP TAMPERING with this mma record box. people here have put time and effort to make it look clean. stop trying to fix what isn't broken people. As it stands , it is 1 fight with exhibition ( 0-1) and his official pro record 1-0)
Could someone explain what a "Mixed martial arts pro-exhibition match record" is.
I've never read that on any other fighters page.  I think this is just an attempt to undercut what Mercer did to Sylvia.  That section should be removed since it has little bearing and the simple fact that no other fighter has a goofy "Pro-exhibition match" record.  (HT to ??) Jklun  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.90.55.195 (talk) 03:07, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and report it because it deserves to be listed on this page.  I will satisfy everyone and list it as his EXHIBITION MATCH record.  I have never attempted to add it to his pro-record.  Regarding, "I've never read that on any other fighters page" it is on Kimbo's page and in both cases it is significant as it establishes the fighters first steps into MMA.  If it is worth enough to mention in the article, it is worth enough to highlight in a box for anyone who is curious as to when and where it happened.  Thanks for the "moron" comment too Drake.  Udar55 (talk) 16:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  mma record discussion 

message: You one who edited the reccord didnt do it proberbly. He tryed to put wat ray mecer had at just befot the fight but for that to work you need a random boxing stating his finaly reccord ( witch doesnt make it look good at all ). So the proper way to do it is to put the record that end up after the so mentioned fight. Am gona correct it - GSP-RuSh.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GSP-Rush (talk • contribs) 10:45, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boxing reccord error 
Talk:Brocken Jr.

message: I'm really sorry...my computer crashed while I was cutting and pasting the info on Brocken Jr.'s wins and losses from the series pageGladrius 03:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First header