lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:DIN sync

message: I added a lot of text to this article, but I am not a native english speaker. Please correct faults. If you disagree with the content itself please get in contact with me. Regards, fanwander.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fanwander (talk • contribs) 21:39, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lot of text added by not native speaker 

message: the list contains mostly devices out of production, because the DIN-Sync is an obsolete protocol no longer used by actual products. So I think there is no need to avoid commericial advantages Fanwander (talk) 10:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , are you proposing we make some sort of change to DIN_sync#Devices_with_DIN_sync? ~Kvng (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  regarding the device list
Talk:Topological entropy in physics

message: I started the page on topological entropy.  It's titled "Topological entropy (in physics)".  Perhaps the title should be changed to "Topological entanglement entropy", as topological entropy means something else in ergodic theory. Maybe someone should start pages on related topics such as 
* (total) quantum dimensions, and 
* the more prominent topologically ordered states. 
Masud Haque (torun) 13:03, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I favour changing the title of the stub/article to 'Topological entanglement entropy' for reason proposed above.Chjoaygame (talk) 04:16, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: change article title
Talk:Kim France

message: Kim France is an editor of a national magazine, Lucky, and has already been listed an a notable alumna of Oberlin College. I was filling out information about her to coincide with the list.Nbirnbach 13:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article requires cleanup to bring it in line with other biographical articles. I've done a bit and added the tags but it could do with some more from someone with more knowledge of the subject. Mickthefish 12:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup Required
Talk:Centenary House

message: Does anybody know or care to whom Centenary House was sold by the ALP? The announcement of 2005 (mentioned at the end of the page) is a bit dated and seems incomplete to a curious foreigner who would like to know if the deal has gone thru, what the further details (beside the price) of the deal were and what happened to the AMAO rental. Khnassmacher (talk) 07:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for complete information 
Talk:Hollywood Gold Cup Stakes

message: I created the winners table here but this important race is in sore need of improvement with so many jockey and trainers' names missing. Plus, there is an error in the Bill Shoemaker attributions but I don't know which year. Handicapper (talk) 16:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Would it be time to move the article to the current race title, Gold Cup at Santa Anita? --Bcp67 (talk) 09:40, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. It's about time. I took the liberty and did the move and rearranged a bit of the article. Brudder Andrusha (talk) 15:35, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good  - I didn't like to do it myself, usually restrict myself to this side of the Atlantic! --Bcp67 (talk) 16:10, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to new title? 
Talk:Camille Leon

message: Could that have been a possible preview of Paris Hilton's recent disinheriting?  WAVY 10 13:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Who knows?  Who cares?  To me, I chalk it up to coincidence. Maetch 17:32, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Camille's Disinheriting
Wikipedia talk:Requests for geonotice

message: There are times when it is appropriate to use the overtly formal system like on this page and there are times when it is not appropriate. This is the latter. We don't need clerks, we don't need subpages, all we need is for people to list it and if there's no objection within X time then it gets approved. MessedRocker (talk) 13:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's formal, but it works. Nothing complex, it works like that just a bit more organised. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 21:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, the clerks are there to organise, much like all systems. Its just a list of people who can be contacted if someone needs assistance - without them, its identical, but harder to find someone who knows about the system. And the subpages is not necessary, just makes it take less room for the implented requests, so they can be archived without staying on this page. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 21:19, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

text: If this is too disliked, I made a more informal process at Wikipedia:Requests for Geonotice/Informal. I can easily see it getting out of hand, though, so I would not support it. I would much prefer to simply cut some of the not-needed stuff out of here - I can't think of what though. Everything is for a reason. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 21:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

text: My thought is that you should go with an informal request setup and see if it turns into a mess.  Then set up a more formal process.  The less process the better. kmccoy (talk) 04:05, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Whoa, whoa, whoa

message: Is this intended for anything other than meetup notices?--Pharos 22:34, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if anyone can think of something else, it could be used. I can imagine "Jimbo is coming to YOUR town - meet him in person, or appeal your block!" notices, or various other things like country wikiprojects, etc. But I imagine the majority would be meetups. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) (Contribs) (Bot) 22:37, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  For meetups, right? 

message: Please remove the Melbourne notice. There is no info about how to get old notices removed. I would have thought they would time out?? Or please someone keep an eye on them and remove them once they pass. thanks--pfctdayelise (talk) 11:12, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please remove old notices! 

message: I don't see a good reason why this shouldn't be merged with the Wikipedia:Geonotice page.--Pharos (talk) 18:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge pages?
Talk:Intel Inboard 386

message: Are there existing pages about upgrading computers that can link to this article to make it more relevant? If not, we can create a generic CPU accelerator article and merge it with this one. We can include models like SOTA's 386si.
The article reads: "..Windows 3.0 and 3.1 (Inboard 386/AT model only"  I can tell you that this is incorrect. An Inboard 386/PC in an IBM PC/XT can run Windows 3.0 and Windows 3.1 retail editions just fine. On my current IBM 5160 PC/XT I have installed an Intel InBoard/386 PC with the 4MB piggyback add-on option, I am running the retail edition of Microsoft Windows 3.1 on an IBM PC/XT in all of its glory, including running Microsoft Office 4.2 Standard (including PowerPoint, Excel, and Word), Aldus PageMaker, and many other Windows 3.1 applications with ease. There were several technical bulletins that incorrectly stated that the only Windows version that would run in a PC/XT with an Intel InBoard/386PC was a special Windows 3.0.0(a) edition from Intel, but that is incorrect.  Prior to having the 4M piggyback option I was running the a retail edition of Windows 3.0 on the standard 1M InBoard/386 PC. The only limitation with or without the addition memory option is that an Inboard/386 PC runs Windows 3.1 in standard mode only, not enhanced mode.  As for evidence I offer this as proof: http://orignialbeast.blogspot.com/   Regards,  NC_Mike  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.26.103.239 (talk) 05:09, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

message: Is it possible to expand this article that includes Intel Above Board Plus expansion card for PC compatible computers and IBM PS/2 computers?  Rjluna2 (talk) 19:22, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intel Above Board Plus
Talk:Dean Castle

message: This is virtually a quick-fail based on the lack of sources, but just doing that wouldn't be beneficial to the article so I'm going to "slow-fail" it with some (hopefully helpful) comments:
*So, most obviously, citations as per WP:CITE are required throughout the article to provide verifiability of the claims made.
*Adopt en-dash per WP:DASH for year ranges, so 1935–36 instead of 1935-36.
*1460's vs 1580s - apostrophe or not?  I'd ditch it, but be consistent.
*Copyedit to remove things like "JamesII".
*The Castle Today section needs to be written in a couple of merged, larger paragraphs, not a series of single-sentence paragraphs.
If I can help with anything more specific then let me know, but don't be discouraged, just try to get some reliable secondary sources to cite the claims.  All the best.  The Rambling Man 16:57, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review 

message: Ghost Investigation of Dean Castle has been removed from the page a number of times. Considering it ties into part of the article of spirit investigation, I would maintain it's right of place in the article. While I may personally not accept the findings of "ghost hunters" there is place (unlike what was suggested) for it in Wikipedia.
I would therefore recommend it is restated into the article, however if there is further reasons to why it may not be suitable, I would welcome the debate. Franko2nd (talk) 22:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spirit Voice Link
Talk:1953 Grand Prix motorcycle racing season

message: Whay are the flags on the 500cc table so inconsistent? Anyone from Northern Ireland (6 riders) should have the union flag against their name as they are British. So too, for that matter, should anyone from Isle of Wight, (Tommy Wood). If you were going to be consistent and break the UK down, you should at least use the English flag from time to time. Yet it appears nowhere. 2A00:23C7:D7B0:8C01:F87A:2E02:CB67:8F4 (talk) 13:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Flags
Talk:Amadori rearrangement

message: Although the focus is slightly different, the two pages have complementary information on essentially the same reaction, and they are both short, so making a too long article is not an issue. -- 13:38, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge with Amadori product

message: Currently, we have a lovely depiction of the rearrangement.  The catch is that the relevant substrates are not ammonia but alkyl amines.  So I might draw that process.  Further, I am pretty sure that this process is the pathway by which hemoglobin is glycated.  That process is relevant to a large segment of our readership. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:32, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Amadori rearrangement depiction and relevance
Talk:Jean Paul Médaille

message: Actually, there are parts of this article that are in error. In the 1970's research teams discovered that it was Jean-Pierre Medaille, not Jean Paul, who was the founder of the Sisters of St. Joseph. The 1913 Catholic encyclopedia article on which this is based took material from an source that was later found to be in error.
Bikernun (talk) 03:27, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There really should be two separate articles, or one reworked article on the actual founder of the Sisters of St. Joseph. The article describes competing claims and at some point came to cover two different people. Still titled after only one, though. natemup (talk) 14:38, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article
Talk:Looney Tunes: Duck Amuck

message: According to this article, Duck Amuck is the only game that runs game code when the DS is closed.  I think there should be clarification on how this is different from the puzzle piece puzzle in Hotel Dusk where you close the DS to move the puzzle from one screen to the other. That puzzle isn't running game code instead of Standby Mode?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.140.173.222 (talk) 03:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: OK, this article was very poorly written, so I had to get in with a flamethrower. Here's what I did:
* Changed the tone of the article. Now it reads more like an encyclopedic article and less like a leaflet with short instructions on how to play the game (and giving instructions on how to play a game is not within the scope of Wikipedia).
* Removed unnecessary information. Like I said above, an encyclopedic article is not an instruction leaflet or manual.
I see the external links issue was addressed before; however, there are no inline citations, so I'm not removing the tag yet. Moderatelyaverage (talk) 01:15, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempted to fix a number of issues 
Talk:Katarina

message: I defend the inclusion of the Doctor Who Character Katarina by itself because, unlike the other individuals listed in the "given names" spin-off page, the Doctor Who character is the only one who is known by the one name alone with no surname attached. As such, it is likely that the name Katarina will be linked directly by itself with relation to this franchise. Listing the character on her own makes sense, because in all likeihood the other individuals under "given names" will be searched for using their full names. For example, no one will look for Katarina Witt under the name Katarina alone. 68.146.47.196 13:43, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Listing Doctor Who character
Talk:Per os

message: there should be an article on this. It's written on a ton of medical perscriptions as P.O.  I think the etymology is relevant.  I think there should be a template linking all the latin phrases medical personal, especially doctors use when writing perscriptions and each should have their own article.  Tkjazzer 13:45, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: there

message: I'm having trouble typing the proper pronunciation symbols.  Please check the symbols and help me add the proper ones. Tkjazzer 14:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  trouble typing the pronunciation symbols 

message: I would like to add an audio pronunciation of british or english version of the expression. Tkjazzer 14:16, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  add audio pronunciation of british and english version 

message: should we tag this with the pharmacology category as well.  Since it is relevant in the medical field relating to pharmacological drugs. Tkjazzer 14:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  should tag with pharmocology category?
Talk:Puppy Love (Paul Anka song)

message: The listing of "Other Songs Called "Puppy Love" is valid in that all songs listed are referenced from the record information provided within the article itself. I see no need to add another listing outside the article confinements. Each listing provides the actual resource where the information was gotten: the record label and catalog number. The only original research was in organizing the listing to make it readable in a chronological fashion. Even the artist and composer information was retrieved from the actual record sources. There is nothing wihin the article that is not based upon these already published sources.
Consider that it could generally be deemed as "original research" when applying already published sources to an article.
FredClem (talk) 23:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research Reference Issues
Talk:Gulf of Corryvreckan

message: Does anyone have an image of the whirlpool? I've found an image on flickr that shows the location of the gulf, but would prefer a better free image. Lurker (said · done) 13:51, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you just want to see it, have a look at . But you won't be able to include those pics here without their permission -- SteveCrook 17:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm looking for a freelt-licensed image Lurker (said · done) 18:13, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I've copied this from a comment in the article as it may be more visible here:
*"The whirlpool has been dived in recent years by experienced Scottish scuba divers who have noted an unusual underwater ecosystem. There was an article on this in a recent British Diver Magazine issue."
*"a link or reference to that article would be valuable"
I found these two articles: GREY DOGS RACE, Scarba and COPING WITH CURRENTS AROUND BRITAIN which mention the Corryvreckan, but don't mention the ecosystem. Try googling "Corryvreckan site:nameofmagsite" on other mags if you have any idea which mag it might be - I've linked to List of SCUBA magazines to help. --RexxS (talk) 01:11, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've amended the entry by including some specific biological info - thanks for suggesting this. Ben MacDui 20:42, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underwater ecosystem 

message: The article text doesn't quite agree with the quoted reference:
:Although not, as is sometimes believed, formally classified by the Admiralty as unnavigable[1] (the Admiralty's West Coast of Scotland Pilot guide to inshore waters calls it "very violent and dangerous" and says "no vessel should then attempt this passage without local knowledge")
:vs: The West Coast pilot stated "Passage conditions 7.260 - It is reported that the excessive rate of the tidal stream and the narrow width of the E entrance channel create an unnavigable area just S of Eilean a’ Bhealaich, an islet in the centre of the E entrance. As a result, it is inadvisable to pass through this channel, and even with local knowledge passage should only be attempted in quiet weather at slack water.'"
I'll check what the current Pilot says, and then see if I can tidy this up a bit. (I've also heard that it used to be classified as unnavigable - I'll see if I can find out when this changed if it ever did). Wardog (talk) 13:28, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnavigable? 

message: The area was surveyed a few years ago, and no pinnacle was found.  Instead, it appears to be caused by a rock steep-sided buttress protruding from the Scarba shore.  (See report by SAMS and article in the Herald).  I'd make the change myself, but I was involved with the survey and I'm not sure if that would count as a Conflict_of_interest.  Iapetus (talk) 09:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not caused by pinnacle
Talk:Forward in Faith

message: This article is listed as a part of the series on Continuing Anglican Movement. Why is that? The main branch, or at least the founding branch, Forward in Faith UK, is still a part of the Church of England, and thus part of the official Anglican Communion, with ++Canterbury as its head. Carissimi (talk) 14:33, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Continuing Anglican Movement
Talk:In da Club/Archive 1

message: What are the lyrics for the main course? "I'm up in the club, bottle full of bub, yo ma got what you need, something something I'm up in there having sex I ain't in their making love so come give me a hug, if you into gettin' rubbed." What is the something I missed?
Can Anyone Add That The Beat For This Song Was Orginaly Meant To Be On Dr Dre's Detox But He Didn't Want It And Was Passed To Be Used By Eminem And d-12 And The Shut it down And Was Later Passed To 50
:If you have a reference for it, then you can add it! djsik 15:37, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Course 

message: There have been several "remixes" (by Beyoncé, Mary J. Blige, Diddy) of this song, and each of them charted within the Billboard Hot 100, but "Sexy Lil Thug" has never been released as an official single - it was a buzz track. I don't know where you've seen a video, but there's also never been released an official one ... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.58.109.236 (talk) 18:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beyoncé "cover" 

message: Is it Chris Moyles or Liam Don? Is this a common confusion or what?— Lenoxus 20:25, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct name of [[50 Pence]] 

message: Is it possible to find the vocal track to in the club, preferably free.
--192.75.95.127 02:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vocal Track 

message: There are 7 things that must pass before an article reaches GA status. I have reviewed it and the result is as follows:
#Well-written: Pass
#Factually accurate: Pass 
#Broad: Pass 
#Neutrally written: Pass
#Stable: Pass 
#Well-referenced: Pass
#Images: Pass
Well done, the GA has passed successfully 
For future improvement, it could perhaps have more comment about the musical content and about the technical production of the track - as it is, it's only present through the critical review section. Some discussion of the structure of the track would also be useful, as would further analysis of the lyrics. Well done to all contributors, though. Bob talk 23:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is sheet music available on this song. So if I decide to bring this to an FA, I'll be sure to add it. Spellcast 12:52, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Result
Talk:Radio Disney Music Awards

message: It is a real Category! Can we please STOP WITH HOAX THING? How is it a Hoax anyway? It is Real!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CowboyCaijun48 (talk • contribs) 08:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at, for example, 2017 RDMA winners you will see there is no category of "Best Band". There is a "Best Group", which is already listed. If you can find reliable sourcing that such an award exists, feel free to present it.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 04:53, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

text: Just yelling about it isn't helping, you need to provide sources that verify what you say. If you are correct, it should be very easy to prove. Sergecross73 msg me 13:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

text: I don't know who "Patrica" is, but it doesn't matter. You need a source to verify it. Not a person to argue with you, but a reference. Check WP:MUSIC/SOURCES for some appropriate examples of reliable sources on Wikipedia for music related articles. Sergecross73 msg me 14:11, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  BEST BAND IS A REAL CATEGORY! 

message: Whoever last edited this page, you have zero proof that it will happen in July 2022 or that it will be hosted by whatever two people you mentioned. RobThomas15 (talk) 17:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The statement has been removed.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 19:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RDMAs 2022
Talk:Mysore Sandal Soap

message: As of March 2006, the Mysore Sandal soap held a 6500 tonne share among the 450 thousand tonnes of soap produced and marketed annually in India.[4] 
The KSDL's soap factory in Bangalore that manufactures the Mysore Sandal Soap is one of the largest of its kind in India having an installed capacity to produce 26,000 tonnes of soap per annum.[2] 
Is there an inconsistancy here? (Msrasnw (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much is produced? 

message: On the UK website is has the following:
"Well over a century ago, a Company was formed in India by the Maharaja of Mysore, Queen Victoria, and Sir Alfred Chatterton. From this Company a legend was born-'Mysore Sandal Soap'. Created then, as now, from the finest, purest, Mysore sandalwood oil, Queen Victoria's favoured skin care product. To this day Mysore Sandal Soap still enjoys the distinction of being in use in the Royal Palaces of the UK.
(Msrasnw (talk) 15:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK connections 

message: The links do not work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Papul1993 (talk • contribs) 08:58, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 
Category talk:Literary collaborations

message: It strikes me that this page should be for the works which are collaborations rather than the authors who are collaborators, with the possible exception of collaborative entities, such as Ellery Queen. Shsilver 14:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. A collaboration is a "joint intellectual effort", which means this category should include the literature, not the authors. Except in rare situations such as Ellery Queen in which the "author" is, in fact, a collaboration. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 21:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

message: There are a couple of odd sorts here - see the novel starting with G under "1" and the novel 1633 at the end under "}". Can't quite work this out but they have a special sort key it seems which may not be relevant to alphabetic category listing. Sterry2607 (talk) 22:18, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sort key