lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Knocking at Your Back Door: The Best of Deep Purple in the 80's

message: There are different versions known. They differ in title 3:
* Europe: https://www.discogs.com/release/1906253 – title 3: Son Of Aleric (Instrumental)
* US: https://www.discogs.com/release/1111573 – title 3: Child In Time (live)
In other words: The US version replaces "Son Of Aleric" by a live version of "Child In Time".
Hasenläufer 14:01, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two different versions
Talk:La Radiolina

message: Part of the article mentions the use of previous content. Also perhaps should mention that Panik Panik is the chorus of Camions Sauvages, and Politik Kills is the chorus of Politic Amagni from Dimanche à Bamako. Chaos syndrome 17:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More recycling 
Talk:Lauschgift

message: As a German, I'd say the pun is rather meant as in "etw. lauschen" = "to listen to sth." (it is a little oldfashioned, but otherwise the pun wouldn't work), making their music a kind of "drug for your ears". --78.51.100.94 (talk) 23:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "lauschen" as "eavesdrop on"
Talk:Dumfries House

message: At the moment there are:
#no decent pictures of the property today
#the page design looks terrible. The Intro is wedged between images.
#no gallery.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.163.108.104 (talk) 16:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your comments. I added a better pic of the front. I've also added some more text and taken out some images to redress the balance. Galleries are not encouraged, but there are plently of images at Commons, via the external link. Thanks, Jonathan Oldenbuck (talk) 15:12, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wiki entry on Loudoun gives Crawfords not Craufurds as you have in the Lochnorris Estate entry. You also have Craufords in the Earl of Dumfries entry Labocetta (talk) 08:49, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images? 

message: :
Is that right?  Lord Mount Stuart succeeded to the Bute title in 1814 (from his paternal grandfather) but already had the earldom of Dumfries from 1803 (from his maternal grandfather), so who had the house between those dates? —Tamfang (talk) 20:33, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1814 or 1803 

message: This is the last paragraph on the opening page.
I think you need to check your facts about where the King was in residence, I don’t think it was Dumfries House. 92.29.76.2 (talk) 19:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The house duly reopened in 2008 

message: :
Is it in Cumnock or not?  Perhaps combine these sentences. —Tamfang (talk) 16:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  in and out of town
Talk:Accordion (GUI)

message: From what I can tell, the example image is *not* of an accordion, but of a *tabbed* UI.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.100.164 (talk) 02:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Image is incorrect

message: I added the Google Reader example but I didn't add a link because Google Reader requires a Google account and anyone who has such an account is probably aware they can use it to check out Google Reader, since it is obviously a Google service.
This article needs a screenshot (I am not yet able to upload files). BoffinbraiN (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From reading the article, I still don't really understand what's being talked about. I haven't looked at the examples yet, but it seems that if the article is going to stand on its own it should better describe (and maybe picture) what it's talking about. --Steven Fisher (talk) 18:36, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: try google google talk ;) 86.61.232.26 (talk) 14:47, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, uh, what is it? 

message: I do not believe that this particular implementation (Moo.Fx) is the first ever to have created an accordion-like widget. The linked primary source certainly doesn't support that claim. New kinds of widgets tend to be created in academia through HCI research, and then evolve in the wild adapting to particular uses. Can we seriously assert that nobody has implemented an animated tabbed selector in Flash before, ever? Diego (talk) 10:28, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious origin 

message: It would be nice with a sample image/picture of an accordion. It would make it much easier to see at a glance what an accordion is.
--Mortense (talk) 13:30, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image sought 
Talk:Hate It or Love It (album)

message: That tracklisting is completely false. Wait for chingy od dtp to release the official tracklisting Trimy67 (talk) 23:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cd Universe 
Talk:He-Man & She-Ra: A Christmas Special

message: I was considering this as a joke gift for a friend this christmas, the box had a copyright year of 1983/84. It shouldnt be hard to verify this. (In the end i settled with conan the barbarian) Ottawa4ever (talk) 15:16, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: creation date

message: This article lists "Folliott S. Pierpont" [sic] among the composers. Folliott Sandford Pierpoint (with two I's in the last name) was a hymn writer. James Pierpont (musician) (one "I" in the last name) was a musician, best known for writing "Jingle Bells." So I'm guessing they meant James Pierpont. One day, I'll watch the movie and verify that it contains the song "Jingle Bells."--Jkisch (talk) 17:27, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music
Talk:Mixtape Messiah 3

message: Added the bit about it being released at 10:00 PM Eastern Time. If you look at the source code for www.chamillionaire.com, that is what the countdown is set to.
Gsmumbo 15:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Is there any actual mixtape versions and dvd versions that you can buy official with the cover?Name01870 16:35, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Download...? 
Talk:BBDO

message: so check it, it says in 1940 some guy introduced brainstorming. then when you click on brainstorming it says it was invented in 1953 by some other guy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.74.4.131 (talk) 10:01, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistency, people!

message: I believe this Wiki is incredibly biased. The company itself links to this page from it's website as it's "About" section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.171.31 (talk) 02:20, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: They probably wrote this page. It's not uncommon. 131.96.91.136 (talk) 16:10, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt they wrote the page, it looks terrible. Rklawton (talk) 19:18, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible bias. 

message: I'd like to go through the history page and delete everything that isn't sourced - preferably from an unbiased source. I'd also like to remove everything that isn't trivial. This won't wipe out the whole list, but it will kill most of it. Thoughts? Rklawton (talk) 19:17, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Honda CB500 twin

message: The best source for CB500 info is CB500 club. Nick 13:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: June 2007

message: Someone recently changed the date that the CB500 was made until to 2002. I believe this is wrong. Lots of sources say that the bike was available in 2003. Apparently it was not legal to buy them after 17 June 2003 due to the emissions regulations. There are definitely 03-registered CB500s out there! But the situation may be different in different countries. Nick (talk) 12:57, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: December 2007

message: Hi guys, I was just looking at this page and noticed that according to Motorcycle News, the rear drum brake was converted to a disk brake in 1997, not 1996. (see here http://www.motorcyclenews.com/MCN/bikereviews/searchresults/Bike-Reviews/Honda/HONDA-CB500-1994--2003/ ). Is this correct and how would you guys rate the accuracy of Motorcyclenews.com overall? 
I'm new to Wikipedia, so any advice in regard to this or other matters would be extremely helpful. 
Rpullen (talk) 12:52, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1997 Model 

message: This is not meant as a criticism because there is a universal problem with Wiki pages, their scope.  In common with many pages on cars and motorbikes, this page can't quite make up it's mind what it covers: just the 1993-2003 CB500 or that plus the 2013- replacement. As on other pages, I suggest that 'CB500' should refer to all the ranges, including the later euro emission compliant replacement. Of course, there is always the problem of the early CB500 (and CB550) fours. In view of this, maybe this page should be titled 'CB500 Twins' (manufacturers don't half create confusion with their model designations- Henry Ford was one of the first!). Assuming we include the 2013- mark, it would be nice to see a pic of this model (I've more or less given up with pics on Wiki because of the hassle).  CPES (talk) 08:38, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to whoever changed the title to 'CB500 twin'. This will help clear the ambiguity with the model designations. I suggest now that both marks be treated in detail (drum brakes on early mark 1 etc) in their own sections as with other bike pages. There is also a conundrum with the side panel right info box and the specification table. see my posts on Wiki Honda CBF1000 talk for similar comments: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Honda_CBF1000   CPES (talk) 09:40, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page scope
Talk:Pop the Glock

message: Is the much point to printing where you can buy the record? 203.97.110.64 (talk) 07:18, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Store Details
Talk:Kypseli, Athens

message: "The population has been estimated to be as high as 400,000 and the area is approximately 4 square meters."  Something seems not quite right.--SilasW 13:23, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Population density

message: "The area's name translates to 'beehive' in Greek...". It does not. Perhaps one might say it translates to 'beehive' in English, though "translate" seems rather strong.
If "Kypseli" really does mean "beehive" (IAGTM) then "'Kypseli' means 'beehive'." without "in English" as this is the English Wikipedia. 
:OK I'll change itAlefbetac 06:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is taken from the article in the external links section. I think what is meant is clusters of buildings.Alefbetac 06:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: The article was repetitive. As Alefbetac says, much was lifted from the external links which appear to be to a newspaper, where one would not be surprised at finding repetitions and padding.  I hope, with no judgement on the worth of the article and its sources, that the style is less like an essay.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SilasW (talk • contribs). 
:Great, much better now Alefbetac 10:21, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A clean-up

message: English 1: It is the home of.  English 2: It is home to.   Famous  here is not encyclopedic.--SilasW (talk) 21:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "To" v "Of"  &  "Famous"
Talk:HVLAN

message: This is a telecom protocol standard discussion.  It does not belong to any company but is under discussion at IEEE, an open forum that includes telecom professionals.
Please remove the speedy deletion tag asap.
thx
this page is almost a direct lift off this page: http://www.ethos-networks.com/index.php?view=article&id=80:hierarchical-vlan&tmpl=component&print=1&page=&option=com_content&Itemid=87
ethos are the guys pushing this stuff, can someone outside ethos please tidy this up and make it neutral and understandable pls?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.102.79.49 (talk) 01:31, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

message: The real contents of this page is Metro Ethernet.
The dude who writes this page thinks 802.1ad is 802.1QinQ.  It is not.
There's a redirect for QinQ that he set up which goees to 802.1ad, and needs to
get fixed!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shmelyova (talk • contribs) 02:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  802.1ad IS NOT 802.1QinQ
Talk:Quatro (album)

message: I reverted text sent to me by STIKI. Geraldshields11 (talk) 01:38, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cite did not support text
Talk:Rainmaker (Kevin Moore album)

message: Originally the article listed Bill Martin as the writer of the track 'Holding on to You'. However, this isn't correct. The writer here is another musician called Bill Martin who served as a staff writer for the American publishers Red Stripe Music and Paramint Melodies, the publishers of this particular song who Bill Martin has no association with. Furthermore, the BMI Database shows that Bill Martin is affiliated with PRS whereas this Bill Martin is affiliated with BMI, which would also indicate they're separate people.
https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?DB=local&PAGE=First (registration number PAu000173698)
http://repertoire.bmi.com/StartPage.aspx (BMI Work # 576299 - additionally search for BMI Work # 240482 for a song actually linked to Bill Martin to prove the different PRS/BMI rights society affiliations between these two musicians)
The song was also performed by Amy Holland on her first studio album - this Bill Martin is listed as having cowritten a song with her called 'Firefighting', which is listed in both the United States Copyright Office and the BMI Database (registration number PAu000230074 / BMI Work # 419066 respectively).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.255.101 (talk) 18:24, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writer of 'Holding on to You'
Talk:Tyra Bolling

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 13:25, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Dunno how to tag non-NPOV articles (still a noob). 69.155.81.39 (talk) 01:17, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Why is she categorized under LGBT people? ×××BrightBlackHeaven(talk)××× 18:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT
Talk:Remembering Stan Rogers

message: A review of this album on the net says it was recorded at Dalhousie U; is the Cohn auditorium on the grounds?  --baylink@en.wp  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.118.32.15 (talk) 02:59, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Click on the link to Rebecca Cohn Auditorium in the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:21, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Karthago (band)

message: Put links into the article in a section called "sources", "external links" or whatever. You are proving, in the article, that they are notable. No one here is trying to delete good articles but we are not mind readers either. You have stuff here to improve the article; go for it and have fun. Cheers! --Stormbay 14:15, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability
Talk:FIL World Luge Championships 1961

message: The doubles event is obviously wrong. One person can't be on two teams. Punkmorten 13:31, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This link shown here (http://www.sportquick.com/techlist.asp?SearchResult=Envoi&list0=Luge&list1=Championnats%20du%20Monde%20piste%20artificielle&list2=&shot2=T&shot3=Champion) has a similar listing. The reason it was like that was to the rules of the International Luge Federation back in 1961. An incident like this may have forced a change in the rules as a result. Chris 14:29, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It says Prinot, not Prinroth, though. Do we have some more reliable sources on this, a book for instance? Punkmorten 19:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have one on me, but I do know someone who is in close contact with the German bobsleigh and luge association who might be able to assist us (User:Marcus Cyron). Let me ask him. Chris 21:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You were right. Cyron proved that the silver medalist was Prinot and not Prinroth. Correction has been made on this article and the main article. I will do it on Prinoth as soon as I enter this entry. Chris 14:13, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Doubles event is wrong
Talk:Roads in Akron, Ohio

message: The article says that "In 2007 ODOT will begin to limit access on Route 8 from Route 303 to I-271", but on aerial photos it looks like access is already limited to five at-grade intersections and the Ohio Turnpike interchange. --NE2 13:33, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is true, it is somewhat limited-access. They are working on making it completely limited-access. SR8 Update --UltraSkuzzi 00:42, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Street Gospels

message: Per WP:NSONG: "Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". This implies song stubs such as this should be merged into the album's article. --MegaSloth (talk) 15:18, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested merge of [[St. Andrews (song)]]
Talk:Consensus (computer science)

message: The paper "The consensus problem in fault-tolerant computing" from Michael Barborak, Miroslaw Malek and Anton Dahbura (1993) is a giant survey about the topic (25 years of research), and could greatly improve this article.
It would also be helpful to have a decent explanation of the intent of consensus. All of the papers on the internet are pay-per-download.  However, the information about how the algorithms work are everywhere, and none of them describe the use of a consensus algorithm.  It is understandable that distributed transactions must reach agreement, and through consensus can decide.  But no one mentions what the algorithm is agreeing upon. Is it states of the replicates, initial conditions given to replicas, the end result of a computation (i.e. everyone must agree on what has been done), agreement upon where to send the data or what to do with it, or is it only an agreement to ensure that no one has failed during some time??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jon.gallagher.04 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

message: *  "(sometimes) reach consensus with probability one."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.251.194.24 (talk) 18:27, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this CS jargon or is this poorly formed? 

message: "control of UAV's" link is inexact. 2603:7000:A607:AC57:252C:BC9:FF64:283F (talk) 17:01, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Link
Talk:Bishop Allen & The Broken String

message: Previously this article had 9/12 coming from the 12 month EPs. In fact there are 10. (March, August (Live), July, May, April, September, May, April, January, New, New, February) JudahNielsen 19:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Billy Muffett

message: I only want to Say, i am the aaaa i dont Know to Say in inglish so i Gonna Say in spanish, ok yo soy el sobrino nieto de Billy Muffett me llamo steven muffett y vengo de Venezuela y  si quieren más información pueden pedirmela Stevenmuffett (talk) 16:22, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am the family of Billy Muffett
Talk:The Graceful Fallen Mango

message: Hey,
I was looking through the Last.fm shoutbox for Dave Longstreth and there's a shout from a user who appears to be Steve Schroeder, the head of States Rights Records, claiming that the backing vocalist referred to as Steve in the liner notes of this album is, in fact, him. Does this count as a reliable source, even though it is just a post on a Last.fm page? It seems likely to me that it would be true, seeing as Longstreth and Schroeder did work together musically after this album, on Morning Better Last! Knotrice (talk) 15:03, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steve Schroeder backing vocals
Talk:Grave Danger/Archive 1

message: I see a slight problem wit the name. It is "Grave Danger (CSI Episode)" when all others are along the lines of "Grave Danger (CSI episode)" (which also seems to be the naiming convention for other TV episodes). (Emperor 17:08, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And while we are tlaking about the name I notice Grave Danger redirects here and there doesn't seem to be anything much else with the name. I'd suggest this could be moved to the top slot. (Emperor 17:11, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, of course. I have a habit of Capitalising Words Which Don't Need To Be Capitalised. I will move this to Grave Danger and fix redirects. Editus Reloaded 18:37, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Damn. Grave Danger exists already. Damn damn damn damn. Have put in a request for move on Wikipedia:Requested moves.Editus Reloaded 14:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'm not laughing now. Between my posting the move request and now (about 2 days), someone has added a disambiguation page for Grave Danger. Will move to Grave Danger (CSI episode) to finally comply with naming conventions. Editus Reloaded 13:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't win ;) The graphic novel is iffy (self-published through Lulu.com) but the Hardy Boys book is solid so it does make sense. Pity it arose while we were trying to sort this out. At least it is finally in the right place. (Emperor 18:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems a little unfair, it's not like there are other articles containing the words "Grave Danger". We go to the trouble of writing a full and detailed article (better than Pilot IMHO, due to analytical commentary) and we have to play second fiddle to a flaky graphic novel and a book that doesn't have an article. I thought that disambiguation was to separate similarly named articles, not topics of discussion. Otherwise, I could disambiguate, say, Honour guard from the novel of the same name by Dan Abnett, although there is no article for the novel. Grr. Editus Reloaded 16:39, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support a move of the disambiguation page to Grave Danger (disambiguation) and this to the top slot. The rest of the disambiguation links are red links and could stay that way for a long time (I'd be concerned that the graphic novel entry if it was ever written would fail notability) making the disambiguation page weak and not very useful. It'd certianly be worth floating the idea. (Emperor 17:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, it seems pretty clear cut, but should we get consensus on it first? Editus Reloaded 19:36, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Clearly no one cares that much. Will fix as soon as I post a note to the quy who moved this ep off the top spot. Editus Reloaded 16:57, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK cool. I was just checking through it and it all seems to be fine so far. (Emperor 18:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm getting seriously hacked off by this now; I'm not allowed to move this page to Grave Danger for no apparent reason. Editus Reloaded 18:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Wozard of Iz

message: in the first line of the article it bluetexts to a game called psychedelica instead of the (probably) proper article listed below. problem is that i dont know how to fix that, so if someone could do that, thatd be cool
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychedelia JuuJJ (talk) 18:32, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - now done.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 18:38, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  psychedelia
Talk:MTV Unplugged (Die Fantastischen Vier album)

message: Used mainly for classic and jazz? I would say it is used mainly for Balver Märchenwochen. Think about it. Best --Weissmann (talk) 07:47, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What about the Schützenfest? Since 160 years? --Weissmann (talk) 09:41, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Balver Höhle
Talk:Up Your Alley (album)

message: Hey!
Can someone add some sources for album genres. I see some listed but there are no sources to back them up?
Thanks!! AgentKozak (talk) 18:22, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. Feel free to add sources. Sundayclose (talk) 23:36, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No sources for album genres
Talk:Vagabond Heart

message: To compose at a later time:
 74.62.92.20 (talk) 21:55, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. 74.62.92.20 (talk) 04:50, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception/reviews/tour 