Talk:The Western Air Temple

message: according to a friend in canada, the next episode will be (firebending master - Dragon of the west) she says iroh returns and aang, iroh and Zuko are firebending. So should we start the page for it ?????  --Master_Hio_Cin (talk) 17:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next Episode was just released Today 

message: The Western Air Temple broadcast in Canada last Night. Can we unprotect this and make the page please? RMS Oceanic (talk) 08:41, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When does it air in america or England?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.144.12 (talk) 13:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed, it already aired. Arogi Ho (talk) 13:55, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed, it already aired in Canada (anything else and the page deserves a ).  UTSRelativity (talk) 18:31, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed, it aired in Canada on December 14, 2007 on YTV.--46thEarthKing (talk) 21:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Moved. --Kizor (talk) 22:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Officially Aired 

message: Rumors have been told that Nickelodeon edited out scenes in this episode because is was too graphic and violent, is this true?
I don't know, But I think it was fine.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiimanwii1 (talk • contribs) 04:53, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes made 

message: we shouldn't mention the mischiefs that the gang mentions about Zuko?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.152.83.229 (talk) 00:57, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the indirect references should be noted, but not all of the crap that normally gets thrown in there. Rau J16 03:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sereies continuty 

message: This page needs serious cleanup, i mean SERIOUS cleanup. im going to work on it, but some help would be greatly appreciated. Rau J16 03:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They also need to elarn how to remove unnecessary information, i swear the plot before i began was 1,130 words, after i was done it was not much more than 600. But its still not done. Rau J16 04:44, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Blow-by-blow descriptions are common with fiction articles in their early stages; they are likely to become more concise after cooling down and becoming better established. This one is just a few days old, so it's not a big deal, but thank you for your efforts. --Kizor (talk) 01:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the guests who've editted this page have atrocious grammar.  I originally wrote the plot summary (moderately concise), and it's been gutted so bad.  I mean, do we really need a huge description of the fight with Combustion Man when 3x10 and 3x11 are 100% battle and comparatively miniscule?  The plot is now extremely wordy and reads very awkward.  Hopefully random edits die down and this thing can be adequately fixed. TastesLikeLove (talk) 10:35, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is many things, but it's not efficient. Sorry about that. I'll take a look at later today, but random edits will indeed die down shortly enough. Those are an initial thing. --Kizor  is in a constant state of flux 02:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As you can see in my edit summaries, I got it down to 517 words. And I think I left enough in for it to still be comprehensible, and sufficient for it to last. Rau J16 07:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OVERWRITTEN 

message: The term "On a silver platter" is a biblical term, originating from how a certian queen wanted to see John the Babptist's head. Toph used the term, but since the avatar has no bible, I'd call this a goof. Should we add that in triva? Or is Wikipedia too triva-happy already? 71.111.76.124 (talk) 05:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Too trivial. Rau J16 05:45, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This could be compared to Azula's usage of the French word "coup", despite France clearly not existing in the Avatar world. ShadowUltra (talk) 01:59, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage of "Silver Platter" 

message: That creature that Zuko's talking with. What is it? A Frog, clearly, and some mammal. Badger? A Badger-Frog?--76.91.228.143 (talk) 21:44, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was a bull-frog..... Rau J16 18:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Creature

message: Watch closely during the battle with Combustion Man. After Sokka successfully hits him with the Boomerang, we can clearly see Toph running of her own mobility, even though her feet are still burned. Oops.--76.91.228.143 (talk) 04:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So, goofs are trivial, and are not very encyclopedic. it should stay out of the article. Rau J16 04:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

text: They made it into the article in City of Walls and Secrets.--76.91.228.143 (talk) 08:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So. one page does not dictate the content of another.Rau J16 18:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Goof

message: A single editor has gone to pretty much every episode page and deleted all of the continuity notes, normally stating that it is "Trivial." And while it may or may not have been, I am not sure that a consensus was reached on this.  Personally, I believe that the notes were useful to readers of the page, providing them with information and insights that they may not have known. Ub3rn008 (talk) 10:28, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They were just fancy trivia, not even real production notes, just links to past episodes that are all to clear to any person who watches the show, who happen to be the only people who come to these pages. And a consensus was reached that trivia try to be integrated to the article, but that made the plot to drawn out and harder to read, so i deleted them. See WP:TRIVIA for more. Rau J16 18:13, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity Notes No More 

message: Why are all the episodes being removed? --Nemodi (talk) 20:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Short version: because consensus doesn't matter. Long version: meh, I'm too tired to bother.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Consensus is when the users reach an agreement, most of the ones i have seen have been compromises. But i was under the impression that, because of the contribution style, consensus should override policy. Nothing is infallible. Rau J16 23:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are they being removed?