lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Giltner, Nebraska

message: School district, merge with serving area MereTechnicality ⚙ 14:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Giltner Public Schools had no sourced info in it whatsoever, so I just went ahead and redirected it here. --Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 21:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Giltner Public Schools]] 

message: In this small town, BISH is a significant employer, and a local person can give us far more detail.  Giltner is located in the center of Nebraska's corn growing belt and Bish has been in the business of manufacturing specialized equipment for harvesting--recently diversifying into marijuana and hemp harvesting.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Homebuilding (talk • contribs) 16:31, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  BISH Industries
Talk:Boeing YB-9

message: Working (on it.wiki) on planes built in the same years, I suggest the actual name for Boeing YB-9 is not correct.
As correctly explained in the article, from this page it's possible to understand the Y1 meaning; so referring to YB-9 mean to talk about a single airframe as shown here. Now I suggest the article has to be named Y1B-9 (as the project never saw action in USAAC apart test flight, so it never became B-9).
I think it's to follow the same rule that brought to the Douglas Y1B-7 article. --Leo Pasini (talk) 15:30, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And as well as Boeing Y1B-20--Threecharlie (talk) 11:12, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm uncertain about this - the 'Y1B' prefix was a bureaucratic construct (the addition of the '1' meant nothing about the aircraft itself, just where the money to buy it came from) that was briefly used. What is the WP:COMMONNAME here? - The Bushranger One ping only 18:08, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I found one instance of each in the Flight archive but that was a brief google based search. GraemeLeggett (talk) 18:39, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

text: We would normally name the article B-9 but in the few instances when only Y or X designations were used then we use that. If all the aircraft were Y1B-9s it may be worth considering but at least one was a YB-9 so YB-9 is the common designation. It was common after the testing phase of these aircraft that the "Y1" would be dropped and they would be known as YB-9s. As the Y1 was only used in the 1930s most readers would probably not expect it as the article title. MilborneOne (talk) 18:50, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was sure it's really difficult for me to be sharp in my first edits here. As linked above there was one single airframe named YB-9 as there was only one named Y1B-9. Then five more named Y1B-9A. But, anyway, as we have to point out the name "most readers would probably expect" that doesn't matter. Maybe it will be better to re-name Y1B-7 and Y1B-20, once again only used in 1930's. --Leo Pasini (talk) 20:35, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the actual name of the article 
Talk:Gold key

message: This whole article is a joke! Obviously you got your "informantion" from third class Hollywood movies. This Gold Key thing would be illegal under Swiss Banking laws. Why? First, banks are required - always - to identify their clients. Second, the bank has to monitor (withing specified limits) the transactions on the accounts so as to prevent money laundring. Folks believe me - even if James Bond and Robert Ludlum tell you otherwise - there are no anonymous bank accounts in Switzerland. It might be that the identity of the account holder is known only to a limited number of employees, but opening an account without having one's identity established - no way. If you want such thing, open a trust account under Jersey or Bahamas law. By the way, the picture shows an ordinary gold ingot.
This article seems to be either total fabrication, or based on fiction. If User:Swiss Banker Can't provide some sort of reliable references for it, I'm going to change it back to a redirect to Gold Key Comics. Tom k&e 12:50, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:My Ántonia

message: do you know of any online literary critics of this book? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 205.188.117.68 (talk • contribs) 21:38 23 September 2005.
* Are you looking for a critique or analysis? Try the SparkNotes guide to My Ántonia. It's quite good. And while you're here, why not consider registering? | Keithlaw 21:56, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. BTW, diacritics don't hurt... ;) —Nightstallion (?) 08:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled section

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support per nom. David Kernow 03:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I changed the wording in the lead; it seems contentious to state that this is considered Cather's best work. Death Comes for the Archbishop almost certainly has equal claim to that designation; several prominent "best novel" lists (TIME's and the Modern Library Association's, for two) list Archbishop but not Antonia, for example. I changed it to say "one of the greatest," which seemed reasonable. 71.236.252.14 (talk) 08:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead?

message: The first paragraph of this article says that the book "is the final book of the "prairie trilogy" of novels by Cather". It would be nice to add somewhere what the first two books in said trilogy are, since this information is missing both here and in the article about the author.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.179.91.217 (talk) 11:36, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it myself on The Penguin website  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.179.91.217 (talk) 11:47, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The articles on the three books are now linked in the infobox, one to the other, and they are named in the article as well.  --Prairieplant (talk) 00:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prairie Trilogy
Talk:Flying Mobula of the Sea of Cortez

message: Please help!
Yishan 21:40, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

message: "Flying Mobula of the Sea of Cortez" is not a good title for a Wikipedia article -- it's not a common name, and the end phrase "... of the Sea of Cortez" is extraneous. I noticed there are redirects from Mobula and Flying Mobula to here. I propose changing the article title to "Mobula" (as in the genus); the apocryphal story about these fish "flying" can be mentioned there. Actually, I think all the articles on this family (devil rays) need attention and organization. Ginkgo100 03:02, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds like a good idea.  I wasn't quite sure how general/specific the name should be when I created the article; it is certainly a bit awkward right now.  It does sound like a good idea for this to just be a footnote somewhere like "the creature has been reported to breach" with a link to the site of pictures/stories.  Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be an existing entry on "Mobula," and I don't really know much else about them, so I wouldn't know how to fill out an article about mobulae in general.  Is there something else this report could be attached to? Yishan 23:18, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Oh wait, it looks like the Manta ray article has since been updated to make a reference to breaching (and includes a link to the report, which I just inlined as well).  While there is supposedly some sort of unresolved taxonomic "mobulae != manta?" thing going on, I find this satisfactory.  So, maybe this article should be deleted or re-directed? Yishan 23:25, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Gil Troy

message: Please stop vandalizing the page to suit your own egomanical needs. Your own undeniable bias and anti-Zionist rantings are clear evidence that you're certainly not qualified to serve as a moral authority on the subject.--Michaelk 22:17, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandal at 132.206.66.193 

message: It reads like a publisher's blurb on a book cover or website. This guy may indeed be a good historian, but he shouldn't be the one to say so in Wikipedia, should he? This is not an encyclopedia article; it's blatant self-marketing and should be deleted. Wlegro (talk) 16:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a cut and paste from his website (http://giltroy.com/biography.htm).  Delete it. Lsimonis (talk) 20:53, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This entry is clearly autobiographical 

message: This entry really sucks. I came here trying to find out what his ideas were. This entry is just a list of his job titles and encomiums. The only thing in here that was helpful was the link to his debate with Norman Finkelstein at Democracy Now. 
Why is he a Zionist? Isn't there anybody working on this entry who understands Troy's ideas well enough to answer that question? --Nbauman (talk) 22:29, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are his ideas? 

message: " In his discussion of this program, McGill University's Professor Gil Troy said, "People are more successful when they know who they are and have a strong identity."
from
Chabad of North Orlando has a 'think club' for Jewish teens
http://www.heritagefl.com/story/2014/08/22/news/chabad-of-north-orlando-has-a-think-club-for-jewish-teens/3166.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamreinman (talk • contribs) 20:09, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a good article to add as a reference? 
Talk:Stina Nordenstam

message: I have put a song in the article. Why are there no references? --andreasegde 19:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: What she's been doing lately? The latest album is from 2004, and the latest collaboration from 2007. What has happened after 2004? Only one single and three collaborations after that, and no live performances since early 1990s. 82.141.65.21 (talk) 07:04, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent info
Talk:Stays (nautical)

message: This seems to mostly contain material that is not, in fact, about stays. Since, AKAIK, "stays" and "shrouds" are basically synonyms, and we also have a Sailboat shroud article, we should probably turn this into a redir, no? I think there's only one sentence here (the stuff about "in stays" - AKA "in irons"), which could be moved there. Noel (talk) 22:37, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Do we need this?
Talk:Vigo the Carpathian

message: it is from the movie ghostbuster 2 its a movie not somthing i made up
:Then I suggest that you be more specific in the future when you start a new article. Happy editing! Shauri 22:51, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Contributed further notes on how Vigo's full name was likely derived by the writers. Zolaar 18:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vigo's Name
Talk:Tambalane

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 22:54, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: I removed the copyrighted material, which was almost the entire article, and edited the non-neutral POV out the rest. Then I wikified it. The link to the site is at the bottom of the article, so the content is still accessible. -- Kjkolb 06:01, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio, NPOV
Talk:Battle of Thyferra

message: I don't really believe that Rogue Squadron was the best fighter corps in the galaxy. The Empire had the best starfighter corps by the name of the 101st Imperial Tie Fighter Wing this one was truly considered the best of the best. I do consider someone to change this article or review it because this battle was taken from Star Wars Rogue Squadron video game. It often changes the way the battle is going to be and I never believe that this battle ever existed. DarthPlaegis, September 24, 7:20p.m.
:You are entitled to your opinion.  But as far as accomplishments goes, Rogue Squadron takes the cake even if only because they have their own series and Fel's squadron didn't. --Maru (talk) 00:19, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:International Secretariat of the Fourth International

message: I've moved the final paragraph, which confusingly concerns the ICFI rather than the ISFI, to the ICFI page. It read "Pierre Lambert led a split in 1971, creating a grouping known as the Organising Committee for the Reorganisation of the Fourth International (OCRFI) until it fused with a grouping led by Nahuel Moreno. That group split pretty soon and Lambert's tendency has since been known as the ISFI and publishes the journal La Verite."
--DuncanBCS 23:15, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved paragraph
Talk:Aza-Diels–Alder reaction

message: Just an opinion here...I think it would look a lot better if you wrote the second and third generic Aza Diels-Alder reactions with two separately drawn dienophiles and two separately drawn plus symbols.  Thanks for your consideration.  :Leeannedy 23:16, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

message: "Diels-Alder" implies a one step percyclic conserted reaction, but the mechanism shown for the "aza-Diels-Alder" on this page is stepwise – meaning it is not.  What is depicted instead is something like a Robninson-Mannich annulation reaction.  Both an "aza-Diels-Alder" and a "Robninson-Mannich annulation reaction" can have the same products but what differs for choosing the appropriate reaction label/name is the underlying mechanism (stepwise v.s. concerted).  This may sound like an insignificant nit-pick but it actually has pretty significant claim for the publishability of reactions especially for bio-catalysts and enzymes.  For instance I am reviewing a paper right now making claims of an aza-Diels-Alder when it has a stepwise mechanism because the authors know this will give undo significance to their biocatalyst.  Trying to figure out where this misconception stems and has spread from I seem to have found myself here on this page...149.155.222.31 (talk) 14:50, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Aza-Diels-Alder" mechanism

message: See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chemistry#Unclear article-names. DMacks (talk) 16:27, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible reorganization/merge/rename discussion 

message: I propose to merge Imine Diels–Alder reaction into this article.  The focus of each article are pretty similar.--Smokefoot (talk) 14:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Ava (poet)

message: * Comments in the article regarding "Frau Ava" being an inappropriate title because "its patronising" (despite that being, as the article itself states, the way she is known) were noted, but the use of the brackets was inconsistent with Wikipedia Naming Convention. Use Ava (poet) if you prefer? Jdcooper 23:19, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Table mountain pine

message: So it has nothing to do with Table Mountain which does have extensive (introduced) pines on its flanks? Is there a Table Mountain in the Appalachian Mountains that its named after?
:No, it doesn't; the pines on South Africa's Table Mountain are introduced Monterey Pine, Aleppo Pine, Stone Pine, and Maritime Pine (Richardson & Higgins 1998, Pines as invaders in the southern hemisphere, pp. 450-473 in Richardson (ed.) Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus, Cambridge U.P.). 
:In the case of Pinus pungens, "table mountain" is a general landform term for any flat-topped mountain, not a particular named mountain. - MPF 10:43, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that this is correct. USDA Plants has it as "Table Mountain pine", which capitalization suggests it is named after a particular Table Mountain (not necessarily the one in South Africa)Plantdrew (talk) 00:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Table Mountain.   71.126.140.136 (talk) 11:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in Category Pinus 

message: In line with Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(flora)#Scientific_versus_common_names I'd like to move this page to Pinus pungens. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 15:20, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This seems like a good candidate. Pinus pungens comes out narrowly ahead in a general Google test, so it looks like there's a good case under WP:COMMONNAME for a move (to say nothing of WP:PLANTS). Plantdrew (talk) 00:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 

message: I added information regarding the ecology of P. pungens with information from a scientific journal about the characteristics, history, and future succession of P. pungens. Katelyncothren (talk) 18:22, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Edit 

message: — Assignment last updated by Isoetid (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Dendrology BIOL 3509

message: I have finished my final edits for my class paper for Dendrology  Crbrurris21 (talk) 17:25, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dendrology Final edits
Talk:Sixth Doctor

message: The infobox for the First Doctor says that he appeared in four series, despite only having two serials in the fourth. The infobox for this page says that the Sixth Doctor appeared in two, despite his first serial being at the end of a third. Would someone care to explain this inconsistency? I didn't want to change anything for fear of starting an edit war.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.194.106.64 (talk) 02:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It was an unexplained change last year; I  it. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency 

message: McCoy DID PLAY the sixth Doctor for the purpose of his regeneration in 1987 in Time and the Rani. --Colin Baker (talk) 09:04, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's mentioned in the appropriate places in the appropriate articles. We don't need to give it undue weight, though. DonQuixote (talk) 11:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Just checked this article, and it does need a lot of work done on it, such as a Development section (similar to Twelfth Doctor#Development) where the above can be mentioned. Work in progress.... DonQuixote (talk) 12:16, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sylvester McCoy 

message: The infobox lists the Sixth Doctor's tenure as starting on 16 March 1984, the date he appeared in the final episode of The Caves of Androzani. For internal consistency within the infobox, and to match the table at , I think the date should be 22 March 1984, when the first episode of The Twin Dilemma aired.--Trystan (talk) 18:32, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: See reply at Talk:Fourth_Doctor#Tenure_start_date. MarnetteD|Talk 18:57, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tenure start date
Talk:Spam blog

message: The Link farm article was inappropriately updated with a section about PBNs (private blog networks) in the past. A private blog network is not a link farm. I think the PBN section should be moved to this article, as private blog networks are just groups of spam blogs. That would be preferable to creating another article. I'll wait a while for comments.Michael Martinez (talk) 20:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private Blog Networks
Talk:Improper Conduct (1984 film)

message: The frequent use of the word concentration camp in this article is inadequate. The text is not written from a neutral point of view. 84.59.105.189 00:12, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have replaced "concentration" with "forced-labor" camps. Hvd69 (talk) 13:05, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Yogis

message: Is "Seven stages (Yogi)" really appropriate here? The page is meant to be a list of Yogis, yet "Seven stages (Yogi)" does not link to an entry on a particular Yogi. Thoughts? Mundek 00:16, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does the Yogi Bear entry make any sense at all?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.154.49.107 (talk) 06:23, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yogi Bear?
Talk:Giovanni Vitelleschi

message: A Non-Succession Box like this is merely a fingerpainting session. The point would be for the reader to move forward and back through biographic articles. First job is to get your list of Latin Patriarchs of Alexandria together. Then make a brief article for each one. Third make a succession box. This is not a contribution. --Wetman 00:17, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pancor Jackhammer

message: The computer game and music stuff should be moved to a 'Pancor Jackhammer in Popular Culture' section or something... Sajt
:I agree, and this is the general consensus among the military project members. Riddley 16:32, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So... since I don't think it's appearance in Battlefield 2 is all that notable or prolific, I'm replacing it with Max Payne (two examples are good, I didn't want to tack on a third). I think the Jackhammer makes a much more notable appearance in that game. --UNHchabo 08:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular culture

message: If the Jackhammer was ever released to the world for use, military or whatever, just how illegal would it be or what kind of licenseing would you need to own one? Supposedly you can own a USAS-12 personally, but this seems a little, weird?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Aringarosa~enwiki (talk • contribs) 18:07, April 7, 2006‎ (UTC)
:Depends on the country. Check out Gun politics for details. --UNHchabo 07:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just curious 

message: This gun bears a striking resemblance to the DAO-12. Does anyone know what the relation between these two is?
-- MiG 01:07, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAIK, there is no relationship.  The operating principle is totally different and it was designed in two different countries (USA & S. Africa). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.118.72.85 (talk) 04:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  DAO-12 

message: The text at the two external links reads exactly the same. I'm guessing Nazarian copied the Modern Firearms stuff, as it reads like most of the other articles at world-guns.ru. Any way to confirm who copied who, and should one of them be removed? Optimus Sledge 19:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links
Talk:List of national parks of the Republic of Ireland

message: I think this article should be deleted as all other countries have a Category:National parks by country, plus, there is the List of national parks of Ireland with the same information as this article.  84.59.105.189 00:24, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who deleted the pictures of the national parks! Does anyone have any pictures of national parks to put up! We need some badly!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.33.52.101 (talk) 12:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustrations

message: Hi, the name of the newest park does not appear to have an English translation. As such I have used the Irish that it has been announced as. Lgallagh (talk) 12:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New national park - Name