lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Turks Today

message: == Why? ==
I was looking at the pages about Andrew Mango and interestingly, all articles contain his denial of the Armenian Genocide and show it as a negative or "bad" side of the author. I think he has the right to deny it. With respect, Deliogul 15:32, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I was looking at the pages about Andrew Mango and interestingly, all articles contain his denial of the Armenian Genocide and show it as a negative or "bad" side of the author. I think he has the right to deny it. With respect, Deliogul 15:32, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why?
Talk:Eintracht Braunschweig

message: Hi, im from Brunswick and think that the rivalry to Hannover 96 is very important for the club an his fans. My english isn't very good, so I ask someone of you to add it in some way to the article.
Thank's from Brunswick 92.77.137.227 (talk) 21:05, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rivals 

message: Should be spoke about more 86.15.149.86 (talk) 22:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIFA 22 CAREER MODE 

message: The redirect 2023–24 Eintracht Braunschweig season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 14:50, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 Eintracht Braunschweig season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Arminia Bielefeld

message: The redirect 2023–24 Arminia Bielefeld season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 18:58, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 Arminia Bielefeld season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Berliner FC Alemannia 1890

message: I was going through your website and really liked your product range but the thing which specifically caught my attention is that you have not included your custom socks product. i was wondering that if you guys upsell with custom socks which are an essential part of soccer. because the comfort of socks is very helpful in the game. and we design and manufacture your socks according to your requirments with your size design and logo. Please feel free and contact us. 58.65.214.27 (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Custom Socks and Beanies with design size and logo.
Talk:Virginia Gentleman

message: This page needs to be fixed. Virginia Gentleman IS distilled in Kentucky, but then it is RE-distilled in Virginia. The label of the bottle says so itself... do you need more proof? It needs to be changed on the page but that would take someone re-working the whole first paragraph basically... get on it!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.127.187.178 (talk) 15:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Im leaving this post as I didn't find any information here or elsewhere regarding "Virginia Gentleman" branded whiskey glassware (Rocks glasses and shot glasses).  I own a single Rocks glass and shot glass and wanted to find some history about them, but have so far come across nothing but a few pictures. Any information is useful at this juncture. 2600:4040:4014:EE00:311A:4E21:A901:9324 (talk) 02:44, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virginia Gentleman Glassware
Talk:Blau-Weiß 1890 Berlin

message: The club never was called "SpVgg", but only ever "Sp.Vg", like its successor. Things might have to be fiddled around a bit. I for one move it to the name "Blau-Weiß 1890 Berlin" so it will no longer be on a wrong place. Others surely will sort out the rest. OAlexander (talk) 09:52, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:FC Union Berlin

message: Why has the name of this article been changed? The club's official name is 1. FC Union Berlin (e.V.). Other articles on German clubs starting with "1." haven't been changed either. Should no-one give a reasonable explanation I'll change it back in a few days.
Cheers, Netzrack.N 11:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:SC Tasmania 1900 Berlin

message: There is no such thing as 10:92. Eversince the 3-point system has been implemented "negative" points are no longer counted.  62.143.13.191 16:55, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  3-point system 

message: Does anyone know where the "Tasmania" part of the name came from? -- Chuq 04:10, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (Please excuse my bad English) "Tasmania" come from the australian ile of Tasmania. The young founders of the football-club had planned to travel there and visit the island. That is why the club had for a long time in its logo the "Tasmanian Devil".   With best wishes, WML from Dortmund/Germany 
89.56.9.159 20:23, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: WML strikes again! Well done and thank you. Do you have access to an image of the old logo? Wiggy! 20:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am from Tasmania in Australia and I had never heard of this Club. That is a great story. :) Maybe the modern successor Club could come over here or do something to promote themselves in Tasmania.49.182.76.174 (talk) 09:05, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Since the latter finished first in the Regionalliga Berlin, they should have been promoted to the Bundesliga. Although they failed to promote in the normal promotion round, they were still better than Tasmania in the Regionalliga.129.70.14.129 18:19, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I remember, Tennis Borussia was offered promotion but declined it. Probably they didn't want to get the beating Tasmania got :)--77.128.10.95 (talk) 22:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was Tasmania promoted instead of Tennis Borussia?
Talk:KSV Baunatal

message: 115px|thumb|left|Historical logo of KSV Baunatal is not the historical logo from KSV Baunatal -- KSVSportwelt (talk) 12:40, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
Talk:SV Babelsberg 03

message: There is a comment in the squad list asking to keep the redlinked players, arguing they are notable. However, player notability is conferred upon players by their appearance in a fully-professional league match - and as the Regionalliga is not fully pro, Babelsberg players cannot gain notability while playing there. Can someone please explain the rationale behind that comment? As it stands, I would remove both the linking and the comment for the majority of players. Madcynic (talk) 19:01, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlinks in the squad
Talk:FC Augsburg

message: The redirect 2023–24 FC Augsburg season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Dl.thinker (talk) 13:21, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 FC Augsburg season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Rot Weiss Ahlen

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:Ahlen.png, found on :Rot Weiss Ahlen, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 16:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Alex Rackley

message: More information specifically about Alex Rackley as a person might be helpful to this article.  The in-article dispute about Mr. Rackley's age is also problematic.  It seems that this article needs substantial attention to its sources and should cite more text sources (rather than exclusively citing web sources). --Matthew K 03:45, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: His date and place of birth is not mentioned on the article, nor is there any info about his family. Nietzsche 2 (talk) 10:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:DPRK WMD

message: Please could someone make the box non-transparent?--TheFEARgod (Ч) 15:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: see 1993 missile test article for example of the problem --TheFEARgod (Ч) 21:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transparent
Talk:Twin tail

message: which has two tails fixed to the horizontal stabilizer between the twin-tail??--Gbleem 15:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Look closely at the image to the right. It's a poorly worded sentence, but there are two additional tails above the horizontal stabilizer. ericg ✈ 16:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: How would the tail on a de Havilland Sea Vixen be described?
--Kitchen Knife (talk) 01:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is usually termed a "twin boom, high-mounted twin tail". - Ahunt (talk) 11:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ta.--Kitchen Knife (talk) 11:25, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sea Vixen
Talk:Crew chief

message: What does a crew chief on a bomber do? --Gbleem 15:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Support --Smack (talk) 19:12, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split the article? 

message: This page was tagged for cu in July 2009. The reason given was rm OR, marking for cleanup. I've copied this over to Wikt and set upo a link on here to it. As it stands, it looks like the official (baseball) and umpire (basketball) are the only possibly valid entries. What do other people think? Boleyn2 (talk) 18:06, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up
Talk:Crisp Building

message: This article discusses Adair and Sentor, a subsidiary of Adair Realty and Trust Company of Atlanta. They appear to be financeers and not architects? FloridaArmy (talk) 18:15, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Financing
Talk:Hagbard Celine

message: I'm trying to be real good about not adding unverifiable stuff here, but there's a few items relevant to this I think need some discussion.  First, Jean-Marc Lofficier has put forth the theory that Hagbard is another identity of Cagliostro/Nemo/Count of Monte Crisco in his French Wold Newton Universe.  Also, the McGee/Marlowe family connection (Obviously referring to Travis and Philip) also appears in PJ Farmer's family tree of Doc Savage -- Marlowe on Doc's mother's side (Norwegian due to her descent from Wolf Larsen) and McGee on his father's (where Cagliostro is also featured).  Should any of this be on the main page, and if so how should it be approached? --Icarus 23
Hello again it's been awhile
I ended up putting the information on the theories of Hagbard's genealogy on a wiki of my own:
http://fnord.wikidot.com/hagbard-celine
As there is a TV series of the Trilogy under development there will probably be more interest in this
Keep in mind that this also may impact the Wold Newton Family and Doc Savage pages
I worked on the Illuminatus! comic and Shea and Wilson never confirmed or denied the theory about their writing. The closest they came was when I asked Bob Shea about this and he said, "Now what do you think?"
As this is based on original research and my own wikidot post I can't put this up without breaking your procedures. But I feel you should know
Kallisti! Icarus 23 (talk) 21:02, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hagbard's Relatives 

message: It is odd that this entry contains statements that events in Hagbard's life story "can't be proven" as if he were real person. He's a character in a trilogy, not a person who was born, lived and died. Of course, the tales of his life can't be proved or documented as he's a fictional character. 69.125.134.86 (talk) 14:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  He's a fictional character! 

message: I'm seeing a lot of original research here regarding Hagbard's name.  There are missing citations and the whole thing reads like an advertisement for Ayn Rand. Can we get someone to check into this and see if it meets standards? Eyes down, human. (talk) 18:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put in how Rand is referred to in book, and removed the tagged "homage" sentence.GraemeLeggett (talk) 21:19, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Libertarian Bias
Talk:3rd Sculpture International

message: Anyone/Everyone is invited to join in the hunt to locate who the artists in the photograph are.  Feel free to contact me about it.  Carptrash 15:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So I am going to toss out this gauntlet again.  Go ahead.  Pick it up. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 14:09, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  And again Carptrash (talk) 20:42, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Who are they?
Talk:Marsh Farm

message: Why is Whipsnade Wildlife Park classifed as a Museum since the link redirects to Whipsnade _Zoo_? - .:. Jigsy .:. (talk) 17:58, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Talk:Edson Keith Estate

message: .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.196.219.17 (talk) 23:42, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:El Patio Apartments

message: What is historical about this place. Da mi basia (talk) 16:56, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: historical
Talk:Wardown Park

message: This is a photo of the sports ground next to wardown park i.e north of wardown park
It is not the cricket pitch of the cricket club which is east of the sports ground.
I suggest you contact the cricket club for confirmation and proper naming and photographs  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.216.245 (talk) 22:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of cricket pitch 
Talk:Waulud's Bank

message: I've created a new template for megalithic sites, Template:Megalith, as used on Pikestones and Round Loaf.  Some instructions on the template talk page, to show how to use it.  Cheers! --PopUpPirate 13:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template:Megalith

message: WisDom-UK (talk) 20:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation needed
Talk:London Brick Company

message: The tone of this article is chatty and the layout is disorganised. It could do with a good edit to pull it into shape.--DavidCane (talk) 23:08, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have attempted to do this.  Dormskirk (talk) 19:31, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Fine with me Dormskirk (talk) 21:33, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagged for Clean-up
Talk:Sarasota Municipal Auditorium

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20060824214351/http://www.flheritage.com/services/sites/floridians/?section=s. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. (Note: This issue was flagged at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2018 May 2.)  Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:33, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Oriental magpie

message: I'm rather dubious about the claim that chicken-on-a-stick are actually magpies, since chicken is not so rare and it's probably more work than it's worth to secretly use magpie meat instead.  Perhaps in the past, but the rumors I've heard was they were pigeon meat, and I'm skeptical of them, too.  Are there any reliable sources which can back up this claim being true in the past or the present? YooChung 14:47, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magpie instead of chicken 

message: According to the distribution map in the article, P. p. serica is not present on the Korean peninsula. Of course, the vernacular name could be misleading, but Korean cities can hardly pick a subspecies of magpie which are not present in the region, as their symbol. Creuzbourg (talk) 14:46, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean? magpie 

message: Is the oriental magpie called pica serica or pica sericea? I am no ornithologist so I don't feel qualified to edit this, but I am seeing both names on different sites apparently referring to the same species. Teatime77 (talk) 00:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin Name
Talk:United States Post Office–Federal Building (Sarasota, Florida)

message: General discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Naming conventions for United States federal buildings.  The specific sources here in this article use "U.S.", as far as i can tell, so I think that "U.S." is proper in article name here. --doncram (talk) 13:04, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  naming to use "U.S." or "United States"
Talk:A Mighty Heart

message: Hey LLBBooks, I can understand you modifying or altering the content but why have you blanked out so much that I filled? They are certainly not speculation..I wrote all this 'coz there was a news item concerning this on CNN-IBN in India. I think what I have written is factual and conforms to good quality.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sriram sh (talk • contribs).
: Hi, Sriram sh. I'm glad we have the chance to discuss this... I was sorta hoping you would contact me. The reason I made the changes that I did was that I found some of the language to be not encyclopedic, "or so the makers say" being an example. Also, I didn't think the information about where Pitt and Jolie were residing was relevant. I cut this section: "Apparently, the film-makers zeroed in on this city because of it's perceived similarity, in terms of topography to the city of Karachi in Pakistan, where Daniel Pearl was beheaded by Islamic fundamentalists, allegedly affiliated to the al-Qaeda, the mastermind organization, in response to the American invasion of Iraq." because according to the BBC article I cited, that wasn't the reason why they moved production.
: However, I realize that I might have been a smidge heavy-handed in my editing, and for that I apologize. You did include a good bit of information to start the article with, and that's never a bad thing! If you feel that there should be things added to the article, please feel free to add, just add a link to your source, because that's the main reason I changed the article: I saw no documentation. If you can find that article that you read, please feel free to add the information back with the source... that would be great. Thanks, LLBBooks 06:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The content
Talk:Baháʼí marriage

message: The range of dowry weight is between 2.22 troy ounces and 11.1 troy ounces depending on where the husbands permanent residence, gold for city, silver for rural. I would like to know what the maximum is to two decimal places please.RoddyYoung 16:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dowry

message: The article is a little unclear.  Are Baha'i women allowed to marry non-Baha'i men? The article states that Baha'i can intermarry but does not make it clear if this is valid for both sexes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.204.191.184 (talk) 20:52, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article states "Marriage with non-Bahá'ís is permitted" which is valid for both men and women.   Both men and women can marry those that are not Baha'is.  Regards, -- Jeff3000 23:44, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Question 

message: Since Bahai Faith is rooted in Islam, is Polygamy permissible? If yes, does this only apply to Polygyny or also Polyandry?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.117.122.86 (talk) 11:43, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, polygamy is not permitted.  Regards, -- Jeff3000 (talk) 18:17, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polygamy 

message: The first paragraph reference two is misleading: This reference is not to the Aqdas text, but to a note written by the Research Department at the Bahai World Centre. "The House of Justice indicates that such materials, though prepared at its direction, represent the views of that Department.." (22 October 1996, to Gavin Reed). I have not found any authentic source for the statement that " marriage and the family as the foundation of the structure of human society."
The paragraph states "marriage is union of a man and a woman" without a source. I have not found any authentic source for this, and it could easily be understood as "one man and one woman" -- which would have the unintended consequence of denying the validity of Baha'u'llah's polygamous marriages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sen McGlinn (talk • contribs) 00:42, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  First paragraph corrections
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-10-09/MyWikiBiz

message: Don't know if you want to mention that deletion review concluded keep.
----
Relevant personal essays on the issue of being paid to edit Wikipedia include User:Jmabel/PR and User:LinaMishima/PaidEditing. -- llywrch 19:51, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Meanwhile, several more of the articles posted on MyWikiBiz.com were copied over by other editors after the situation flared up again." - Can someone please point out what articles these were?  Could the author please provide links?  This is exactly why WP:COI in its current form just doesn't work.  I have absolutely no idea how to track them, so far I only know of Arch Coal and The Family & Workplace Connection. - Hahnchen 04:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't provide links because I have little confidence about whether the articles will still exist going forward. However, you can certainly go to MyWikiBiz.com and find their list of wikified articles and start checking against Wikipedia. Note that I did not check all of the list, only enough to confirm that this was happening, and also some of the companies already had Wikipedia articles before, and their content wasn't produced by MyWikiBiz. --Michael Snow 05:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did check the MyWikiBiz website, but that's just making a mockery of the current procedure right now, as there are also listed articles which have been on Wikipedia for ages, and new articles, which we don't know whether he actually authored.  Do you have links to any of the debates? - Hahnchen 15:15, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Don't Go Breaking My Heart

message: Do not change this 2600:387:A:3:0:0:0:39 (talk) 23:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing