lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Workers' control

message: Shouldn't this be moved to Workers' control (lowercase "c") instead? dewet|™ 06:53, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A valid point.  But 'Title Case' is used elsewhere - e.g. Industrial Revolution.  I've made it a redirect  --GwydionM 16:56, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi Wikipedians, I'm currently reading some books on worker control and I'm trying to put as much of it onto this page by listing historical examples by country. If anyone could review my work or even add some of their own to make sure I'm not making errors then that would be great.
Polycracy
Polycracy (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Giving this page some new life 

message: Shouldn't this page be merged with workers' self-management? Polycracy (talk) 15:52, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with workers' self-management?
Talk:Compressor (software)

message: Compressor 4 should redirect to this page Doremon764 (talk) 17:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compressor 4
Talk:Banque de l'Indochine

message: Removed from article --Walter 06:59, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: --Pyvanet (talk) 07:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about Saïgon branch? 

message: Some of information regardien the operation of branches appear to be incorrect. Internet traders offer letters postmarked 1958 in Bangkok and 1953 Tokyo 1964 Phnom Penh. Please verify. --Zenwort 12:04, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asian Branches 

message: The "Pacific Ocean" section states:
  "Indochine [Banque de l’Indochine] converted its branches into Banque de Polynésie in 1973."
But in 1984 in Papeete its name was "Banque de l’Indosuez".
The location, according to Google Maps, is currently identified as Banque de Polynésie, but that was not the name it had in 1984.
BMJ-pdx (talk) 02:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect history in Papeete, Tahiti?
Talk:National Institute of Design, Gandhinagar

message: I think putting up student names is not such a good idea, imagine,
in five years there will be 30 x 5 = 150 names on this page.
so have removed names, if anybody objects to this, we'll discuss.
--Girish 07:03, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Student Names

message: The article needs significant editing. Can't provide, but did flag as NPOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.201.44.249 (talk) 21:17, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased 

message: *deleted*
Sorry :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 57.250.231.247 (talk) 09:37, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NID has two articles in Wikipedia 
Talk:Yanggeum

message: Need hanja for this instrument.  The Chinese use two different sets of hanzi so it would be good to know which one is used in Korea.  Badagnani 07:06, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be fixed.-- Visviva 12:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hanja needed
Talk:Sefton High School

message: Motto: Sincerity, Scholarship, Service (a.k.a. SSS - side, side, side (trigonometric shorthand))
Can someone remove that? 12:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto 

message: The statement "Sefton High School consistently receives the highest HSC result among partially selective schools" is excessively unsourced, to the point that I highly suspect there is readily available information to easily proove otherwise. 
Due to the highly declarative nature of the statement, and the aforementioned lack of sources, the statement will be subject to immediate deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia policy, until reliable documentation has been provided to suggest otherwise.
Jason McConnell-Leech 08:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: HSC

message: The last sentence in "History" is incorrect:
"Many of its first students were "New Australians" who had recently arrived from the United Kingdom and who were living in nearby Villawood."
That sentence applies to Chester Hill High School, which is also mentioned in this paragraph. Look it up in Google Maps. The "Villawood" in question is now the Villawood Detention Centre - right next to CHHS, and about 4 kilometres from SHS. I attended CHHS and had friends in SHS so have some claim to subject matter expert :)
Old_Wombat (talk) 10:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence about the wrong school
Talk:Sainte-Foy-lès-Lyon

message: Ste Foy has two twinning citys: Since 1968 Limburg a. d. Lahn in Germany and since 1992 Lichfield in UK.
At the same day in 1992 Lichfield became also the twinning community of Limburg.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.17.19.130 (talk) 15:35, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twincitys
Talk:X Window authorization

message: Is the file containing cookies .Xauthority or .Xauthorization? I have the former on my machine, but maybe I have a non-standard setup.
:It's .Xauthority indeed. Actually, it can be any file, but .Xauthority is the default. .Xauthorization was a mistake; thanks for pointing this out. - Liberatore(T) 10:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

message: disambig needed: XAuth (Extended Authentication), an open cross-site auth platform developed by Meebo.--87.162.40.2 (talk) 13:29, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another article and disambiguation needed for XAuth 

message: Two times the word "access", one is enough.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.192.232.54 (talk) 22:20, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  on the Internet access full access to an X  

message: X authority is what the file is called, but X authorization perhaps makes more sense.—chbarts (talk) 02:08, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to X authority or X authorization 

message: "These cookies are created by a separate program and stored in the file .Xauthority in the user's home directory..."
Does that mean on the computer running the X client ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.109.216.148 (talk) 16:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cookie-based access 

message: "These cookies are created by a separate program and stored in the file .Xauthority in the user's home directory..."
Does that mean on the computer running the X client ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.109.216.148 (talk) 18:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cookie-based access 

message: Server can refer to the SSHD server, or it can refer to the XServer. These are not the same machines, so referring to "server" is ambiguous as it's not clear which server is referred to. 12.51.199.242 (talk) 00:48, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The word server by itself is ambiguous
Talk:Long War (21st century)

message: This looks like an attempt to fascize the USA. Because of the long war, all civilian institutions will be gradually replaced with military ones and eventually USA will be Starship Troopers. There will be no elections and the power will be held by the [anti-semitic slurs deleted, WP:NOT a soapbox. . 195.70.32.136 07:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: The above comment was not made by User:Prospero74 but by User:24.238.155.149, and modified several times. Sandstein 04:27, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you for your suggestion regarding :Long War (21st century)! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. Sandstein 04:31, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

text: And thank you for providing directions on making new additions. I am new to editing Wikipedia (after admiring for quite some time) and greatly apppreciate the guidance as a new user. I can even sign my name with ease. Prospero74 02:01, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Diaboromon

message: I noticed someone vandilized the Keramon part of the article, and it got removed, can someone put it back? --207.197.112.4 (talk) 16:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll put it back, as well as reinstating the Armgeddemon part. ggctuk (2005) (talk) 21:46, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keramon 

message: This article is quite image-laden with the text, so might I suggest placing all images except for the infobox image at the bottom of the page as in a gallery with captions telling us what each one is? ggctuk (2005) (talk) 21:49, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Second Epistle of John

message: Yes, we can include the whole letter, but wouldn't it make more sense to summarize it instead?  We can easily link to the article. Also, it doesn't say what translation is being used. john k 08:03, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Certainly 2 John contains the fewest verses, but 3 John is the shortest book in the Bible by word count, even though it has 14 verses. (Using the KJV)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.240.159.208 (talk) 10:23, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortest? 

message: I took out this section:
" however, during the first century, when Christianity began to spread, which is also when the letter was allegedly written, advocates of gnostic teachings would not have had enough clout, and could not have merited such a response."
since it seems to be OR. 03:48, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  gnostic teachings 

message: That John the Apostle wrote the Second Epistle of John is fundamentalist claptrap. tgeorgescu (talk)  09:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The identification of John the Apostle with John the Evangelist is quite old in Christian folklore. It predates Christian fundamentalism (late 19th century). Dimadick (talk) 11:28, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claptrap
Talk:Science Week

message: I really like our UK NSW and I'll try and add a bit more about the history of our UK week later. The article so far is mostly the result of a google search, as you might guess, but hopefully people around the world can add info about the Science Week and events in their own countries.--luke 08:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local info needed 

message: Why is this page marked as a current event?
Maybe we should remove this.
--Philippe 17:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why current event? 

message: The articles linked to are well out of date (National Science and Engineering Week has changed a lot since then) and factually innacurate (the week is run by a charity, not government - there are more errors)
I have removed it. Darcysarto 14:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the criticism section?
Talk:Battle of Saint-Denis (1567)

message: As the main battle of the Second Huguenot War, I think it would be good if this article had a section of background, and a section describing the battle. Both sides claimed victory with convincing reasons. 
This battle is also interesting due to being one of the few instances where the leader of a nation's navy fought the leader of the nation's army in a land battle. Ikmxx (talk) 21:18, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to be expanded
Talk:Battle of Saint-Denis (1678)

message: Re recent edits, there's been extensive discussion on Sources elsewhere, (some of ) which is worth capturing here;
(1) Olaf van Nimwegen is not 'an associate professor affiliated with Utrecht University;' he is Professor of History at Leiden University, and lecturer at the Dutch Defence Academy. Here is a list of his publications https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?q=olaf+van+Nimwegen+publications&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart
Doesn't mean he can't be challenged, but he's one of the leading experts on Dutch military history, and should be treated as such.
(2) Tucker, Nolan, Sandler, Young and other editors of Military Encyclopaedia generally use the same original Source, the 1970 work produced by Trevor and Ernest Dupuy. Hence using Sandler and Dupuy to reference the same point doesn't make it twice as reliable.
Robinvp11 (talk) 10:07, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Duly noted, it has been discussed that Nimwegan is very biased on his views towards the Dutch but the recent changes are in my view accepted. Eastfarthingan (talk) 10:55, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seen the discussions elsewhere. The criticisms are not valid, and chiefly relate to treatment of prisoners, which Nimwegen doesn't consider casualties; the rank and file were returned asap, since their captors didn't want to feed them. You can argue about that, but he applies it to the French as well. That is the only significant 'difference'. Robinvp11 (talk) 12:09, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on sources 

message: *"As a result, the battle is generally viewed as a draw, or inconclusive."<Sandler, p.514>
"Sandler, Stanley (2002). Ground Warfare: An International Encyclopedia. Vol. 1, page 514;"The victories accumulated in the following years: Valenciennes and Cassel in 1677 and Ypres and Saint Denis in 1678."
Someone should find a source(s) for "..draw, or inconclusive", and show that Sandler calls Saint Denis a French victory. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:53, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The Infobox and article have been updated so there are Sources provided for French victory, Allied victory and Inconclusive. Robinvp11 (talk) 12:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Robinvp11, looks good. --Kansas Bear (talk) 12:47, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source misrepresentation
Talk:William Farquhar

message: What are his contributions to Singapore?Kingykongy
:Urgent!Kingykongy
:quick!!!Kingykongy
What do you mean what are his contributions to Singapore? While Raffles founded Singapore, Farquhar was the first administrator of the nascent colony. Granted, he did not entirely get along with Raffles, but he ran the colony in Raffles' absence during the first years and kept it orderly and out of the hands of the Dutch. Raffles came in after for sweeping changes, but Farquhar was operating on the most minimal of resources and set an example for the salutary neglect that Singapore was administered under for years to come. Karajanis (talk) 23:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Farquhar's contributions to Singapore

message: Article gives as dates of death both 11th and 13th. Which one is it? With google I find mostly 11th...--Nedergard (talk) 07:33, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Infopedia Singapore says 11th and I am inclined to believe them. I'll change it.--Nedergard (talk) 07:54, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death? 
Talk:Scottish Junior Football Association

message: Anyone know why all the clubs in the West region are listed, but not for any other region? Benson85 23:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumbly because nobody's added the other regions' lists yet. However, it would probably look better to remove the Western list, or at least reformat it so it shows their current divisional status. Not sure. Either way, feel free to add the other regions' teams! Nach0king 10:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  West region 

message: Are players in Junior teams amateur, semi-pro, or professional? I am guessing a mix? Worth maybe clarifying that point in the article to compare these teams to the Senior professional teams like Rangers, Celtic, etc. I am guessing the bottom league Junior teams are effectively village or pub teams turning out on a sunday and anybody could form one, and that the top Junior teams are semi-professional, players being paid some sort of match fee and working part time in other jobs? Love to learn more, excuse my ignorance, would be great if somebody could explain it more in the article. cheers. --mgaved (talk) 15:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. There aren't many people watching/editing Junior articles, so it will likely be me that adds the clarification (when I can). Thanks for your input. - Dudesleeper /  Talk 19:43, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Amateur or Professional?
Talk:Blantyre Victoria F.C.

message: Greetings fellow Vics followers. Big question - can anyone prove that Jock Stein played for the Vics - the Jock Stein page says he did, I was always told he played for Blantyre Celtic - If he did play for the Vics the link needs adding.
Danny McGrain played for the Vics but I have been told that it was the Celtic and Scotland defenders cousin and not the man himself. I have seen the name on a programme so one of them has played for the Vics.
Can anyone confirm?86.1.196.6 22:06, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:New Haven Ninjas

message: What is an "expansion team" ?
What is the AF2 ?
What sport is this ?
Remember, some users of Wikipedia are not in the USA. GeraldH 08:57, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic questions 
Talk:Blues in New Zealand

message: I've copy-edited and wikified the article, and moved the material on two entries from the "artists" section to their own articles.  The same should probably be done for at least some of the others (bearing in mind notability guidelines). --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 09:02, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Kia ora, just making  few changes to this section.  Will add references and do some rewording. Realitylink (talk) 02:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update of section for Hammond Gamble
Talk:A Whole Lot of Nothing

message: "This album is exactly the opposite of its name. This album is a whole lot of jewels, sporting a new musical dimension in the band's sound." Wikipedia is not for record reviews. Elf-friend 09:09, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Blatant point of view. Hard to fix without stubbing. Computerjoe's talk 09:50, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Open Inventor

message: There's a bunch of fairly civil but NPOV stuff in this. Clearly somebody's been unhappy with the twists and turns of OpenGL development.
--Anniepoo (talk) 18:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Infobox URL http://oss.sgi.com/projects/inventor/ redirects to https://www.hpe.com/us/en/solutions/hpc-high-performance-computing.html
2A02:1206:4564:9F30:A8A5:224B:3178:D404 (talk) 16:26, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website 

message: How about https://www.openinventor.com/ ? Is this the same? Thanks for any advice. 2A02:1206:4564:9F30:A8A5:224B:3178:D404 (talk) 16:29, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open Inventor™
Talk:List of Members of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities

message: Is this really a list of Jews? If so surely it should be "List of Jewish Members of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities". It may be that all current and past members were Jews, but does that make it a list of Jews, rather than a list of members?
:I think this really should be a list of Israelis rather than a list of Jews. Eyal Bairey 20:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Saponification value

message: "If there are more moles of potassium hydroxide (KOH) used for 1 gram of fat then there are more moles of the fat." is not a complete sentence. Also, this entry makes it sound like sap values for NaOH and KOH are interchangeable. Hardly, the KOH value should be 140% of that for NaOH, to account for the additional mass of K, since the hydroxide concentration is what is of utmost importance. --Belg4mit 21:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense resulting from edits? 

message: "The calculated saponification value is not applicable to fats and oils containing high amounts of unsaponifiable material, free fatty acids (>0.1%), or mono- and diacylglycerols (>0.1%)." This is not true. Saponification value is applicable for any substance which contains saponifiable compounds. Maybe the writer meant that the calculated molar mass of the fatty acids is not applicable. Comments? I'll change it in a few days if nobody responds. Philwkpd (talk) 23:00, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saponification Value not applicable?
Template talk:World War I snipers

message: I just figured I'd make it clear, as the author of :Template:WWISniper and :Template:WWIISniper, that those famous for events outside of their respective war (eg, Ottavio Bottecchia) would be listed on the template, but would not have the template put on their biographical article. Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 09:21, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Grey Owl?  I mean, was he even in the military?  Mussolini?  If no one has any objections I think I'll take these people off the template.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plesiosaur (talk • contribs) 01:39, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Read their biographies, they both served as snipers during the war. Sherurcij (speaker for the dead)  05:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are These People Really Snipers?
Template talk:WWIISniper

message: I just figured I'd make it clear, as the author of :Template:WWISniper and :Template:WWIISniper, that those famous for events outside of their respective war (eg, Ottavio Bottecchia) would be listed on the template, but would not have the template put on their biographical article. Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 09:21, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Where there not notable US WWII snipers?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.203.162.69 (talk) 01:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find them, feel free to add them!:) Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead)  02:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Snipers 

message: I think, there must be the special links related to the topic, just as Snipers of the Soviet Union → Soviet Union for Soviet snipers section in the template, etc. Because, links to countries are obvious and readers' benefits from them were doubtful. Besides, link to Germany led to modern Germany, not Nazi. --85.141.122.0 (talk) 21:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unwikify for countries
Talk:TVR 350SE

message: How can it be: "Number 26 of 25" and where is Number 25? --89.50.182.140 09:45, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

message: While thankful to those who provided information and pictures, I am pretty sure that we don't attribute work to authors and so forth, beyond what's visible on the history pages. Will remove that part soon, unless uproar ensues.  ⊂ Mr.choppers ⊃  (talk) 06:15, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Names

message: This reads like an advert for owners to sell their old cars and not an encyclopedia entry. 98.114.246.216 (talk) 19:52, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising
Talk:Bobby Au-yeung

message: We need to expand it more.-- 陈鼎翔   说!贡献 Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 09:58, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand

message: Since Chinese surnames with two syllables are not unheard of, am I correct in assuming that 歐陽 is his surname and 震華 his given name? Also, I've seen his name written as both Bobby Au Yeung and Robert Au Yeung. Which one should be considered more correct? Tasnu Arakun (talk) 19:30, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding the name

message: I tried it, but it says a page with that spelling already exists or it's not valid. Here the explanation:
Misspelled: Mistake in spelling of his double surname: Look William Kwai-sun Chow-Hoon as example. 
Only a two syllable given/first name doesnt capitalize the second syllable of the first name. 
A double surname are still two seperate names (Au and Yeung), while the first name Tsan-wah=Tsanwah, its one name, like Tsai Ing-wen, Ing-wen=Ingwen.
You can also look at Jin Au-Yeung as example. --Alleingänger (talk) 12:06, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You seem to be mistaken. Au-yeung is not a double surname, it is a Chinese compound surname, which is a single surname composed of two or more syllables. How we should deal with the spelling of his surname should ultimately boil down to how he and reliable sources spell his name. _dk (talk) 00:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  If possible, someone should move the page to "Bobby Au-Yeung"