Talk:Labia minora

message: is it possible to have a labia minora that is protruding, such as is shown in one of your pics? how come? does that mean that the labia minora of a woman may also have different sizes, as is stated in the page? why? how come?  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.213.95.228 (talk • contribs).
:Thank you for your comment.  You should know that Talk pages are not intended for discussion on the topic of the article, they are intended for discussion of the article itself.  Please see Talk page guidelines if you would like more information.  Now, is there a change that you would like to suggest for the article?  Joie de Vivre 18:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not only are protruding labia minora possible, they're commonplace. And labia minora is PLURAL. The singular is labium minus. Also, I have a suggestion for a change to the article- a lot more detailed info. Gringo300 03:58, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I was thinking the same thing. -kotra (talk) 21:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: questions

message: There needs to be an article on cutaneous folds. Gringo300 05:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cutaneous folds

message: The penis article has six photos. Why are there so few photos here? Okay, the penis article shows penises erected and unerected and circumcised and uncircumcised. But still... The female genitals are as important as the male, right?
:I imagine that there's probably a lack of free pictures of labia minora. Also, please sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes. Instructions on how to do so are on the top of the talk page when you edit it. Asarelah 03:52, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently, there are 5 images on penis, 7 on this article, and 10 on vagina (which is a more accurate equivalent of the penis). The number of images fluctuates according to many factors. Availability is one, but someone's idea of which genitals are more important probably isn't. -kotra (talk) 09:10, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 6 images are present for two paragraphs of text.  Something tells me this isn't for educational enlightenment.  Jachin (talk) 10:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Only one of the images is a photograph, so I doubt they're being used for titillation. Besides, most of the articles on body parts have a large number of images. Armpit, for example, isn't a particularly sexy body part, and it has eight images. -kotra (talk) 23:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Please explain. What are the symptoms for what? -kotra (talk) 23:44, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

text: It's easier to see the labia minora if there's no hair 108.212.109.237 (talk) 16:44, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: the following is not a summary of what is in the body, and the specific content is not supported by the source provided. parking it here for now while a related discussion is worked out at Talk:penis.  The relevant page in the book is here which says: "The labia minora (homologue of the penile urethra and the skin of the penis in the male) are thin folds of stratified squamous epithelium that arise from the urethral folds.  These folds are continuous with the epithelium of the vestibule lying between the vaginal orifice and the labia majora,  The labia minora vary greatly in size and shape.  They split anteriorly to enclose the clitoris, forming its prepuce anteriorly and frenulum posteriorly. The labia minora contain sebaceous glands and are rich in blood supply, but are devoid of hair follicles. They fuse posteriorly into the fourchette or posterior ring of the vaginal introitus".  
They are homologous to the male foreskin, frenulum, urethra but no other penile skin.Manual of Obstetrics. (3rd ed.). Elsevier. pp. 1-16. .
- Jytdog (talk) 16:19, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  development 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:37, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: Why does it comes out and how can it be reduced/normal 2409:4042:4E0B:60ED:E4BF:C360:12F2:60D4 (talk) 19:38, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labia majora 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:37, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Quite possibly. I am rather the porn aficionado and I must say that the female pudenda are portrayed in all their variation and glory. And before the patriarchate gets blamed for this, men generally love the inner lips in all their variation and glory. My source for the second statement is that lips in porn are so variegated; and my source for the first statement is a cordial invitation, to all who may question its veracity, to google for vulvae and surf for a few minutes.
(I must concede the point for sculpture; inner lips are rare in that domain.) 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:79A8:4CEC:EB5F:5455 (talk) 13:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Due to the frequent portrayal of the pudendal cleft without protrusion in art and pornography