lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music/projects

message: I added New Age music to this page because some New Age music is electronic so there is an overlap in the genres.
But then I decided to undo my edit because much New Age music is not part of electronic music.   I am not sure how to differentiate that in the construction of the article, but I think it's better not to include New Age music in the Electronic music project since that implies it's a sub-genre.
If others feel it should be included, that's OK with me, though it seems to me that's not needed.
Parzival418 04:23, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lazarevo

message: You are wrong. Lukács in this case is not a surname but a first name of a member of the Hungarian noble Lázár de Écska family. --Koppany 08:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since when is name written before surname in Hungarian? PANONIAN 22:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Quite often in foreign languages that sometimes causes confusion. --Koppany 06:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lukács

message: This section is confusing. I read it as "many citizens belong to these associations" and "the football team contributed a few members to the Yugoslav national squad", but I'm not sure. Hopefully the original author or someone who knows better will see this and fix the awkward wording.Matttoothman (talk) 21:09, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Features

message: No single German was "ethnically cleansed". Most of the Germans left from Vojvodina together with defeated German army before partisans and Red Army would have chance to "cleanse" them. The minority of them who remained in the region were sent to prison camps that existed up to 1948. After camps were abolished, Germans became free citizens of Yugoslavia. In the next decades, most of them emigrated to Germany because of economic reasons. They were not "cleansed", "expelled" or what ever. This is an shameful tendency to accuse Serbs and Serbia for various types of "ethnic cleansing" wherever you can without any reliable sources or any real knowledge about the events. PANONIAN 07:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unlike other Swabian villages, Lazarevo was not evacuated when the Red Army was approaching, so most of the German population remained in October 1944. After the Sowjets continued their fight towards Hungary, the civilian population came under control of Tito's partisans. Some were murdered, some were put into labor camps (e.g. camp Rudolfsgnad/Knićanin, camp Gakowa in today's Opština Sombor), some were sent to the Sowjet Union and some were allowed to stay in the village (the old ones). The German exodus from Lazarevo only took place in 1947, when the harsh treatment did not end and there was an opportunity to cross the border towards Romania (were the communists were not yet fully in power) and from there to Hungary and further to Austria and than Germany. It is not true, that they left when the Red Army was approaching in summer 1944 and it is also euphemistic to say, they later left for economic reasons, like later the "gastarbeiter". It was more or less an willing ethnic cleansing, ordered by Tito's government. If you are really interested in the Swabian point of view of the village's history (which of course is also not free of national bias and some ahistoric legends), read the following website: http://www.lazarfeld.de/chronik-und-mehr/ortsgeschichte-1800-1950/ --El bes (talk) 04:12, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Germans
Talk:Carraleva

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Participants are satisfied that the move target is a more common name for the article subject than is the current name of the article.   — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 October 2023
Talk:Beška

message: "can you supply me with the page number? do you also have a reference for krcedin? thx!"
No, problem: Dr. Dušan J. Popović, Srbi u Vojvodini, knjiga 1, Novi Sad, 1990, pages 110-114 contain a list of all settlements in Vojvodina that were inhabited by Serbs during Ottoman rule and both, Beška and Krčedin are on that list, so it is incorrect that we say for these places that they "now" have Serb majority because that is not anything new. PANONIAN 21:55, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My library does not carry that book, can you tell me, if it says anything about when exactly Krcedin was founded? I'm not into sorting people into ethnicities, that's why I routinely write "now". I believe the population in Krcedin thought of themselves chiefly as "peasants" at least until the mid 1850s, not as Serbs or Germans or Roma. Fossa?! 23:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Info when Beška was mentioned I translated from article on Serbian Wikipedia (I used D.J. Popović mainly for info about Serb inhabitants of the village during Ottoman rule). As, for Krčedin, article on Serbian Wikipedia does not say when it was founded or first mentioned, but it certainly existed during Ottoman rule because D.J. Popović mention it in his book. Regarding question what was ethnicity of the people in the past, maybe there were no early population censuses that could describe ethnicity of the citizens, but there are data about their language, religion and personal names, which can clearly indicate who belonged to which ethnicity. Problem with word "now" is that it present POV of certain people (I do not say that you purposelly wrotte such POV) which accuse Serbs for change of demographical structure of the region since 1918, but in the same time, such POV ommit the fact that exactly Serbs were main victims of the change of demographical structure of the region before 1918. Serbs are present in most of their settlements in Vojvodina for many centuries and (unless we speak about some places that were founded in the 18th or 19th century and that were initially inhabited by Germans or Hungarians), we cannot use word "now" to describe Serb presence in these settlements. PANONIAN 06:03, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Gamzigrad

message: I corrected the article because it stated that one of the uses of the complex was a Villa for the use of the emperor after his abdication. Galerius didn't abdicate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.247.105.231 (talk) 12:10, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galerius abdication? 
Talk:Rajko's Cave

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20060111134656/http://www.yuta.co.yu/en/travelguide/Caves.asp. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:44, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Marble Cave, Kosovo

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20060111134656/http://www.yuta.co.yu/en/travelguide/Caves.asp. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Pakashticë

message: Why don't you ask the people of Kosovo if they are part of Serbia. Surly Kosovo should be for the Kosavars and Serbia for the Serbians. How would you like it if Turkey annouanced a historical claim to Serbia, after all, Serbia was once only a mere province of the Ottoman empire? Why can't you accept the declaration of the democratically elected parliment of kosovo that kosovo is independent?  2007apm (talk) 21:59, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kosovo's independence
Template talk:W-short

message: I'd like to see an anonymous switch for this short template... Could be done right?--oKtosiTe talk 09:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Λυδαcιτγ 22:54, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, thanks. --oKtosiTe talk 08:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous version 

message: When I try to combine a header and a border, I get this:
Hello, W-short, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.  Happy editing! oKtosiTe talk 22:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to work on Template:w-basic. --oKtosiTe talk 23:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Λυδαcιτγ 01:23, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  This does not work for me (in the year 2020), User:Audacity - I get the exact same result as shown above. I've edited the documentation - feel free to revert that change once the bug is found. Cheers, CapnZapp (talk) 09:54, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Header & border 

message: Not sure what went wrong  but we should restore the link that was here for years before the change last month. Many of us use this is to avoid large tutorials. Was using this for a month before someone told me what the link was to...dame it...why so many problems with this !!!!!--Moxy 🍁
:I firmly oppose. Your preferred page, WP:Contributing to Wikipedia, is way too long — new editors are never going to read through it. By contrast, the first page of the Help:Introduction tutorial series, Help:Introduction to Wikipedia, is extremely digestible, and if new editors want to continue beyond it, they easily can.  talk 00:14, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure what to do as this is the 3rd time you have reverted here? We talk about it before here so I am not sure how to proceed as its a template. Guess we will have to get a few others involved ? What is so funny here... is I think 66 pages is way to  long...odd we have the same problem about the pages. --Moxy 🍁 00:21, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restore old link
Category talk:Fauna of New Guinea

message: for whoever cares: i have categorized the Fauna of New Guinea as belonging to both Fauna of Oceania and Fauna of Indonesia. what's the use of categories if we aren't inclusive, right? politically, at large part of the island is Indonesia. but geologically and biogeographically, New Guinea is undoubtedly Australasian in character, and specifically Melanesian. so there. - Μετανοιδ  (talk, email) 03:49, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What ''is'' new Guinea -- I mean, ''really''?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Khachkar destruction

message: Keep I don't see any POV fork in the article. It should definitely be kept. I can't get Adil's point when he compares isolated, minor acts of vandalism (which I am sure happens in Azerbaijan too) with the politically motivated demolition of ancient headstones. Elsanaturk, how international organizations and others may access the site if it closed by azeri government?  --Gegman2 04:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Markovac (Vršac)

message: Марковац је највеце село у поморавлју и посто броји преко 4500 (четири хиљада и петстотине !!!!) становника ЊЕГОВО МЕСТО ЈЕ ОВДЕ !!!!
МАРКОВАЦ СРБИЈА !!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.101.233.103 (talk) 14:35, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Novi Kozarci

message: see http://banaterschwabenforum.phpbb6.de/banaterschwabenforum-beitrag3519.html
According to the historical map they show in the thread, "Heufeld" seems correct. The surrounding towns and villages: Kikinda, Charleville, Hatzfeld (today Jimbolia), Tschernja (Srpska Crnja) etc match. -- 79.215.131.229 (talk) 17:44, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical names: Heufeld, Mastort
Talk:Ostojićevo

message: According to „Etnički sastav prema popisu iz 2002“ There were 754 Hungarians living in Ostojićevo, in other words: 26,5 % of the population.--Speidelj (talk) 21:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A link would be nice, I've just read that many Polish Silesians from Wisła emmigrated there, so I reverted that edit, but 300 of their descendants sounds dubious as for example :sk:Ostojićevo, Čoka negates that. D_T_G (PL) 15:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Population
Talk:Windows Live Mesh

message: Removed apple stub template as this is not an apple product or service. It has been replaced with the Microsoft stub template.--Wiki Fanatic | Talk 04:43, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Apple stub

message: As of December 17, 2008 the consumer feedback on this product has been overwhelmingly negative
with most ostensible installations completely failing to perform.  Please see consumer feedback
comments at Windows Live Sync websites.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.205.242 (talk) 21:15, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaints

message: I use this program to sync 20GB that are inside my music folder (with sub-folders) and it syncs fine. So far the only problem I've seen is sometimes I can't access my pc remotely. Other than that all good. I haven't seen any negative reviews either, so I some are found they should be added to the references 193.136.142.7 (talk) 01:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Limitations?

message: The article doesn't say whether the 20 folder limit includes sub-folders or not. SharkD  Talk  01:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub-folders 

message: Article has not been updated with information on the August 2010 feature update. Article + Infobox need revision.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.247.145.37 (talk) 18:59, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 
Talk:Westford Academy

message: Competitive?  Maybe, if you mean that everyone else is even more awful.  Seriously, when I was there, I almost killed myself. - MSTCrow 04:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Goessel, Kansas

message: Please review the following:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  15:16, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 

message: The history only covers the founding of the town (which is also incomplete). The town has been around for 133 years and none of the events that took place during those years are covered. 
:Please add it! Sbmeirow (talk) 22:29, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: The village of Gnadenfeld (translation is Green Field) was located where Goessel now stands.
Gnadenfeld does not mean green field. Gnade means mercy, grace, blessing. --::Slomox:: >< 10:33, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gnadenfeld 
Talk:Steve Bellamy

message: I massively edited this piece and took out everything that seemed like opinion or wasn't based in concrete.Wikiwaverly (talk) 16:34, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The opening line said that Bellamy is a vegan and vegetarian, which makes no sense, so I removed vegetarian.  If he is in fact a vegetarian, please switch this edit, but do not include both.--Hraefen Talk 04:50, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vegan and vegetarian?
Talk:KROK International Animated Films Festival

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this is the most important international animation festival in that part of the world (or at least it was when I created the article, I'm not sure about today). And frankly, I believe that the nominator was exercising an extreme lack of judgement! The claims in this article are easily verified. What is Wikipedia coming to when editors place speedy-delete notices without doing so much as a cursory Google search? Esn (talk) 09:14, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 
Talk:Ed Freeman

message: I think the dates are wrong; He couldn't have been a pilot, in the Vietnam war if he lived from 1845 to 1918......  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.145.141.57 (talk) 18:39, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, they are definitely wrong; it looks like they were accidentally copied and pasted from another article. He is still living, and I couldn't find any source giving his birth date, so I just deleted the dates. jwillbur 21:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Welcome screen

message: Same reason as in the W-graphical template. There should be a comma after "Hello". - Eugene Krabs (talk) 03:34, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ᵗʰᵉʰºᵗʷʰᵉᵉˡˢᵍᵘʸ₉₉ (ᵗᵃˡᵏ!) 19:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: Can a "|nosig=true" option be added like with Template:W-basic?  
Also, the message field () on this template does not seem to work.  Thanks. -Fnlayson (talk) 16:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add nosig option 

message: Hi, I used this template on a new user's page and the message function doesn't work, I double checked by using the template on my own user page with the "Wikipedia is better than Brittanica" message (your formatting) and still nothing. If it's of any relevance: Windows XP SP3, Firefox 4.0.1. CaptainScreebo Parley! 16:54, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems this was never in the template, even though the documentation specified it (probably to do with adapting the template from something else). I've added it now. I don't think I've broken anything (I tested it in the sandbox). Rd232 talk 19:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Groovy, now that's what I call service, oh master of Wikicode. ;-) CaptainScreebo Parley! 20:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You're welcome, though I think I'm more journeyman than master... :) Rd232 talk 22:26, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken? 

message: This is mostly an excellent welcome screen - but if it was on my talk page, I would get tired of that bouncing globe in about 5 seconds and delete it. RockMagnetist (talk) 03:47, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: For those like me who don't want it to bounce, I created . RockMagnetist (talk) 05:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: With no personal offence intended to its creator, that bouncing ball is one of the nastiest animations I have seen on the Internet for quite some time. It should not require a special parameter to hide it; it should be permanently and completely destroyed. 86.179.113.102 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Replaced by static image. Good riddance ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't follow the bouncing ball
Talk:Poquoson High School

message: If someone has a picture (or pictures) of the school or activities, please post them here.--Chrisfortier 04:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See the rationale at the image description page Chrisfortier 03:20, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale
File talk:Bear print 5661.JPG

message: Serious questions have been raised regarding the accuracy of the assertion that this is actually a bear print, both with an inappropriately placed note on the image page itself, as well as several times on Talk:American Black Bear.  Tomertalk 04:58, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm no expert in this area, so I'll defer to the experts. Can anyone say what it is then? Bears are common in the area. (I also have photos of trashed beehives that were within a couple miles.) It was definitely too big for any racoon I've ever seen. Pollinator 14:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy tag
Category talk:Districts of Indonesia

message: The :Category:Subdistricts of Indonesia is misnamed. This and the subcategories need renaming. Instead of "Subdistrict" it should be "District". AsianGeographer (talk) 12:23, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I was pointed to WP:CFD#HOWTO - but this looks to complicated to me. Can someone do it? AsianGeographer (talk) 12:49, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  As I mentioned on your talkpage, there is already a category for districts of Indonesia, which is properly populated.  Mukim are subdistricts, which are in this category (✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:01, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I only see :Category:Districts of Indonesia - deleted by Fastily. AsianGeographer (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Category name
Talk:Hand in Hand (1961 film)

message: Under Plot, the statement the boy makes is "You killed Christ." Not as is written in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.236.5.23 (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Quote 

message: This movie has been shown a couple of times over the last few months on TBN.  Each time I "come in on the end of it".  I have searched trying to track down a DVD to buy.  So far, no success.  Can anyone tell me if there is a DVD available?  If so, where can I buy it?   Thanks.  
-Bmillen 08:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD for "Hand in Hand"? 

message: Try www.movielead.com , 1-866-741-8714.  Good transfer, in the original black and white, sound and image quality are good to very good.  As at June 2008, cost for the DVD, shipping and handling is about US$50.  Hope this helps.
Omyago (talk) 02:19, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD for "Hand in Hand" (1960) is Available