Talk:Gala (apple)

message: Is there any objection to merging Royal Gala Apple into Gala (apple)? The request has been up on Royal Gala Apple since Oct 2006. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 03:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally if a merge tag has no opposition for more than 4 weeks a go ahead for merging can be preformed. The "Royal" page seems to have been created by a user who plagarized information from other articles, and the content seems suspect, and there's no doubt that it refers to the same apple. Radagast83 04:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree! Except there was no comment at all left on either talk page. The mass delete and redirect without comment kind of looks suspicious even if well intentioned and completely in good faith. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 12:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

text: No objections yet to merge Request. It's been a week. I'll wait another week. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 22:15, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Request

message: Merge complete per concensus on this page above. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 03:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged [[Royal Gala Apple]] into [[Gala (apple)]]

message: I added the term "cultigen" into the lede and removed it from the discussion of Royal Gala Apple.  Although it is true that most of the Royal Gala Apple trees (perhaps all) are cultigens (that is, organisms of a sort that cannot be produced naturally), so are nearly all Gala apple trees (probably all except the original seedling).  This kind of cultigen is produced by grafting the Gala (or Royal Gala or some other Gala sport) scion onto a non-Gala rootstock.  The resulting organism is therefore chimeric, and therefore not exactly a clone of the Gala.  Recognizing that a cultivar (cultivated variety) is an economically defined taxon, and that these cultigens were produced to grow Gala apples, they are examples of the Gala cultivar.
Of course, if the Gala cultivar were to be propagated via a stooling process (used to propagate clonal rootstocks), the result would be Gala on its own roots, which would not be a cultigen, but still a cultivar.
Whew!   Jay L09 (talk) 16:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Cultivar Vs. Cultigen

message: The "Season" section left me rather confused when the harvests are in either the northern or southern hemispheres. -- Beland 02:04, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the info in this section is meaningless as things stand. The Royal Gala season info is also unclear. I bought a bag of new season English Royal Galas in the supermarket today, and they seem to be harvested in September and October in Europe generally. --80.176.142.11 (talk) 18:03, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 20:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: Is it just me, or are the following sentences contradictory?
" They are also considered to be a very soft eating apple due to their lack of crispiness, well-suited for denture wearers. Quality indices include firmness, crispness, and a lack of meal worms!"
Either it's ambiguous and doesn't mean what I think it means, or it's saying that Gala apples are both soft and firm, as well as both lacking crispness and having much of it.  From what I've eaten, Gala apples seem relatively firm, and as far as I can remember, they definitely are not "very soft."  And clearly, the meal worms clause is unnecessary. (Stever Augustus 20:08, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characteristics 

message: The "Season" section needs an edit. Overuse of the word "some" and confusing references to different markets in the same paragraph. Consider splitting into subsections based on market/hemisphere? I'm not sure what exactly is meant in the sentence about the Australian season due to poor grammar.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Expuddle (talk • contribs) 13:44, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Season section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gala (apple). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100610185442/http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/Produce/ProduceFacts/Fruit/apple_gala.shtml to http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/Produce/Producefacts/Fruit/apple_gala.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The opening paragraph says that gala was #1 in the US in 2018.  The reference links me to a more-or-less blank page.  On the other hand, https://producegeek.com/gala-apples/ says it was projected to be #1 in 2019. Kdammers (talk) 07:00, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  #1 in US?