lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ibrox disaster

message: Could this article not also be added to Category:Stampedes ? Rob McDougall 22:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Two seperate articles seem to be justified here. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 22:13, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Split?

message: I moved the information into 1902 Ibrox disaster and 1971 Ibrox disaster. Having two separate subjects in one article together was just laziness. However, now I'm off to merge World War I and World War II just because they both happened in the same place (the world). 
Incidentally, I thought about calling the articles "First Ibrox disaster" and "Second Ibrox disaster" because, at first glance, the Google hit rate for those terms seemed so high (over 100,000). But in reality it isn't. Actually scrolling through past page 10, "first ibrox disaster" without Wikipedia gets just 91 results today, and "second ibrox disaster" gets 115. 
Responsible? (talk) 20:20, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: I have temporarily deleted this page to shake off a system error; I will restore it in 24 hours (if I don't, please do). bd2412 T 02:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Restored. bd2412 T 23:34, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temp deletion.
Talk:Robert Wall

message: The whole World Black Belt section was lifted from http://www.worldblackbelt.com/Founding_Members/Wall_Bob.asp , which is © 2000 - 2006 World Black Belt Inc. -Kfor 13:42, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing copyrighted material 
Talk:Drake & Josh Go Hollywood

message: it's Geo not G-O
just thought i'd add that
:Watch the movie using captions (or watch The battle of Panthitar) and it will say G-O.--72.66.13.32 02:17, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I feel like I'm being picky but

message: It's 64 witch credits, not 73. --84.113.33.181 (talk) 18:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Running time
Talk:New London School explosion

message: Based upon survivors' accounts of the event, there is a level of uncertainty of the exact moment in which the explosion occurred, with the earliest time appearing to be 3:05 and the latest appearing to be 3:20. 
Lothar the Terrible 19:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncertainty on exact time of explosion. 

message: As of 2008, the New London School explosion is the third deadliest disaster in the history of Texas, after the Galveston Hurricane of 1900, and the 1947 Texas City Disaster.
:Do we really need the words "As of 2008"?  I feel that those words could easily be deleted and would make the section flow better.  Jerry G. Sweeton Jr. (talk) 13:28, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree - so long as this article is changed regularly. It poses the risk of another larger disaster invalidating it and nobody changing it to reflect as such.  I made minor changes to correct the wording, but did not address the content itself. Locopingvin (talk) 05:13, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: As of 2008....

message: Evidently a school bus crash killed 26 kids (at the time of the paper printing, there was a couple still living that would soon die) in Sandy, Utah on 5 Dec 1938. The first mass funeral was held for those children and a parent of child in the Texas explosion sent a personal condolence. In any case, the 455 number is way different than what's quoted here. Here's a link to the clipping I made from the article. I am a subscriber and though I can't right now, I will try to remember to search for the Texas explosion at that website tomorrow. I may find more news. MagnoliaSouth (talk) 05:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of deaths 
Talk:Peter Piper

message: This article either needs to be expanded, or deleted--Alex Arnold 23:39, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a reference that has a definition that's even briefer: http://www.bartleby.com/59/6/peterpiper.html Also, this would seem to verify that this is a Mother Goose rhyme: http://gutenberg.mirrors.tds.net/pub/gutenberg.org/1/0/6/0/10607/10607-h/10607-h.htm --BillFlis 11:40, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I question the importance of mentioning the comic strip "Peter Piper." It seems unlikely that anyone would be confused as is warned against. 108.93.144.242 (talk) 02:37, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comic strip 

message: Two dry gallons. A peck of pickled peppers. 194.207.86.26 (talk) 06:05, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peck
Talk:Lenny Skutnik

message: It seems that there is a discrepancy between the spelling of the last name.  Because I don't know for sure what the true spelling is, I have put a link on this page to the entry with the alternate spelling, and vice versa. Mapsax 23:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Once we figure out which is the correct spelling of his last name, this and Lenny Skutnick need to be combined into one article --rogerd 02:49, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure it is Lenny Skutnik - when googling the term "lenny skutnik", I get 800 results, compared to that of "lenny skutnick" which returns 300. - Also ABC news (a hopfully reliable source) has him listed as "skutnik" - http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/Nightline25/story?id=351913 - however, I'm too lazy to merge the pages and sort out the differences, but I thought I'd lend my two cents drf 02:30, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Skutnik" vs. "Skutnick"

message: The last part of the article detracts from Lenny.  Anyone opposed to breaking the article into two with links to each other? Archtrain 22:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Break up into 2 articles?

message: What exactly does he do for the federal government? It is weird to the point of irrelevancy to identify him merely as an employee of an entity that employs many thousands of people in extremely varied tasks.76.23.157.102 (talk) 08:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Identification
Talk:Pickled pepper

message: Pickled peppers certainly deserve their own entry in Wikipedia. The entry so far is just a stub, but let's give our Wikipedians a chance to expand on it before deleting. How else do articles get started around here? I mean, why not delete everything that's not quite perfect, in your estimation?--BillFlis 23:42, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, I don't understand the part about pickled peppers not being recognized, as you call it. I mean, I wouldn't recognize dephlogisticated air if I met it on a street corner, but we do have an article here about it. Just because you never heard of something doesn't mean it doesn't exist, or that it doesn't deserve an article. By the way, dephlogisticated air doesn't exist--see the Wikipedia article if you don't believe me!--BillFlis 00:06, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I changed my mind--delete it! I mean, nobody has anything substantial to contribute, let it die.--BillFlis 11:32, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Kisenian Flower

message: Shouldn't this article be called "Kisenian Flower"? Danny Lilithborne 23:46, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's exactly what I think. Xenian, Poupelin, Queen Badiane...they should be under the title of the official pronounced name in the anime, therefore they should be "Kisenian", "Pupuran" (r/l), and "Queen Badiyanu". Why are these Movie articles named as such? -- RattleMan 04:34, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Dragon Ball (artifact)

message: I'm just wondering if there's someone actually made this  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.13.23.115 (talk) 07:40, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Dragon Ball Wishes

message: I worked on this for quite a while stated the differences between the namekian and the earth dragon balls, hoped it helped. 9:23 October 10 
Prince Of All Sayains
When Mr. Popo and Kami make the wish by the end of the Frieza saga, they wish that all those killed by Frieza and his HENCHMEN brought back to life... Not just those killed by Frieza.
was that random henchman killed by frieza brought back to life--sailor cuteness-ready for love 18:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: cleanup

message: I marked this article for cleanup due to the many inconsistencies within, such as fan-translated names vs. official FUNimation translation vs. Japanese transliteration (e.g. Kuririn (Krillin), Z-Fighter, Z Senshi, etc.).  Please help make this article consistent.  --Geopgeop 17:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: This page overall is pretty confusing and I think it needs a little more organization. We should decide on a good outline to organize the information in different headings. It looks as though there is some cruft and too much "in universe" lingo.--FUNKAMATIC  (talk) 18:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I guess I'll head this up after finals this week...--FUNKAMATIC  (talk) 05:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: alright, I'm going to work up a good organization for this page--FUNKAMATIC  (talk) 02:33, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More Cleanup

message: I've edited it from 龍球 into 龍珠 because on the Japanese Wikipedia it states: "漢字表記は龍珠。" and in all Chinese translations of the series the Dragon Balls are always referred to as 龍珠. --Yottamol (talk) 20:51, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kanji of Dragon Ball 

message: Is there any reason why the Chinese pronunciation of the names are favored over the Japanese? Sarujo (talk) 12:51, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In a couple years time, we all have to get used to a lot of things starting to be spelled in Chinese...
-G  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.170.129 (talk) 16:55, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Dirt jumping

message: Apologies for the wait - exams appeared, and, briefly, i was under the impression they were more important than wikipedia. It won't happen again! ;)
I've added Joe's definitions word-for word (i converted them to a table, but otherwise didn't change anything), so the same invitations to correct apply.
We need someone who knows the history of DJ to write that up, too.
Also, pics of jumps and/or tricks would come in handy.
-- Lordandmaker 21:48, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I've re-written the article...

message: I have noticed a ever-growing list of names in the mountain bike dirt jumpers section.  While these riders may be skilled in their own right, I am left questioning their impact or importance in mountain bike dirt jumping
Also, I noticed some of them are misspelled, but I am not sure of the extent.  Check it please —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.231.128.254 (talk) 23:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of Names 

message: Shouldn't "drop" be mentioned as a kind of jump? This term seems common in mountain biking. I'd call any jump a drop, if the take-off is fairly level and the landing is way below the take off. Usually the landing is not at great distance and is steeply sloped. I hope someone has a better definition. Or is this term not used in dirt jumping at all?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2455:E20:3000:C9BE:1D73:F1A9:8BCC (talk) 18:52, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drops
Talk:Peter Tait (mayor)

message: there is some claim this is "L" , can we have some references and expand it to what it actually stands for. - SimonLyall 00:14, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Middle initial?

message: There are three articles on WP at present about people named Peter Tait. So we should have a disambiguation page. I've had a look whether this person is the primary topic, and he's quite clearly not. So I shall move this page, so that this article name can be used for the dab page. Here are page view statistics for October 2010:
* Peter Guthrie Tait – 1176 
* Peter Tait – 221
* Peter Tait (radio presenter) – 157
So if anything, Peter Guthrie Tait is the primary topic. But given that the page name doesn't need disambiguation, I shall just move this page to Peter Tait (mayor). Schwede66 07:32, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Tuberville v Savage

message: I have moved the following remarks to this page, as I think they have nothing to do with this case at all:
To constitute assault under English law, s.16, Offences against the Person Act 1861, the person to whom a threat is made must be put in fear of immediate actual physical harm. An assault may be committed against a third party if that third party is immediately proximal to the person to whom the threat was made; for example "if you do, [or don't do] a particular thing, I'll kill your [relative]". This is an example of a threat promimally sufficient to constitute an assault against the third party, and quite probably, against the person to whom the threat was made.
"s16. A person who without lawful excuse makes to another a threat, intending that that other would fear it would be carried out, to kill that other or a third person shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years."
James500 (talk) 04:52, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section 'treatment' has nothing to do with this case - OAPA 1861 didn't even exist in 1669 

message: What actually happened was that the gentleman who's actions were in question put his hand on the hilt of his sword (a customary action, a veiled threat, as if to draw it) and stated 'If the Assize were not in town, I would run you through'
This classic case is an example used to illustrate the need for the coincidence of mens rea and actus reus (where neccesary) to prove these vital elements of an offence.
Therefore there was no coincidence; the words spoken (mens rea) cancelled out or negated the action (actus reus)
I think the article on this case is poorly written.
(Alanalan001 (talk) 13:51, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Talk:Summerland (TV series)

message: Greetings... per WP:FICT, I've tagged the articles Bradin Westerly and Ava Gregory for merge into this article.  Alas, the other two articles are somewhat cleanup-worthy, so a simple copy and paste probably won't do the trick without some cleanup.  Just FYI.  :-)  RTucker 01:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They're too short to stand on their own and I'm for just pulling them in, and tagging the sections here for cleanup. Yick. -- Ipstenu (talk|contribs) 14:41, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I say merge them alright. And while you're at it, why leave out Cameron Bale?   --87.11.237.35 21:27, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Bradin Westerly / Ava Gregory 

message: Where is your list of episodes? Ospinad 21:18, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episodes? 

message: What about him? Edenc1 • Talk 21:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jonathan Slavin 

message: Is the series released on DVD?31.54.250.172 (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Type the words "Summerland TV series DVD" into Google and you'll answer your own question.  --Jayron32 19:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

text: I would look it up on Google by typing in "Summerland TV series on DVD" and you should find your answer and if not look on different shopping websites.Stevenricci (talk) 05:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

text: here are some websites that have it  http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0400037/
http://www.dvdinthebox.com/summerland-complete-seasons-12-dvds-boxset_p16911.html
http://www.hishows.com/product_609.htmlStevenricci (talk) 05:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD 
Talk:Old Man (song)

message: I'm taking out the reference to jay adams. this is about the song not him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.139.170.117 (talk) 00:21, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the DVD of his Prairie Wind tour (actually the DVD of Jonathan Demme's Heart of Gold film), he does *not* state that he bought his ranch from the old man.  He says that the old man was the caretaker on the ranch; he repeats this story at least once (see youtube for Feb, 1971 BBC performance of the song, in which he also says he purchased the ranch from "two lawyers").  Also, there doesn't seem to me to be anything in the lyrics that makes it "pretty clear" that the narrator is addressing his father. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.73.52.184 (talk) 19:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section of covers is huge, but I haven't touched it because I'm not 100% sure on the policy.  I don't think non-released recording are notable enough to mention, but I'd like some other input before I start deleting things.--Tegrenath 02:51, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Covers section
Talk:List of minor Star Wars Imperial characters

message: "Aran Cho is a male human that stands just above 2 meters tall(6 feet)."
2 meters are NOT equal to 6 feet. Which one is correct?
--bufdaemon 19:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aran Cho 

message: ...is an article that currently overlaps with this one; for example, Rom Mohc appears on both lists. I'm not sure exactly what to do about it, since there *are* some characters who are Imperials but not villains. (Also, there are definitely some serious problems with notability standards here, since listing every Imperial ever named in a licensed SW story would probably make the page megabytes long, but I'm not sure what to do about that either.) --DocumentN 02:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, although it's not a full solution, I think there might be enough material to split off a "Characters in the Dark Forces series" article for people who want to edit that. --DocumentN 03:04, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of minor Star Wars villains]] 

message: Was this edit necessary? I think the deleted last line is important to identifying the guy - most people wouldn't immediately recall who Piett is or who was standing next to him in what scene, but everyone remembers the guy who said "Too laaaate!". I'll revert later if no response, probably. --DocumentN 15:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gherant 

message: I'm working on amalgamating this and all the other god-awful lists at :Category:Lists_of_Star_Wars_characters to remove all the ORish and arbitrary topics (i.e. what makes a character a "villain"? what if he/she later is "good"?) and repetition (e.g. Leia shows up on several of them). Once I've squished them together, they can be broken up just alphabetically like the slightly-less-crappy Star Trek character lists. I've copy-and-pasted these lists as of ~11:30EST 3 Oct -- if you make any additions to this list, I'll try to be sure to maintain them in the reworked version, but please be mindful that something might accidentally be overlooked. Thanks! --EEMIV (talk) 15:39, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revamp

message: I plan on Monday to replace the current content of List of Star Wars characters with the material at User:EEMIV/StarWarsCharacters, and then to redirect this page to that updated list. Much of the content on this page will go away -- for the better. Wikipedia is an indiscriminate collection of information, even on its list pages, and many of the entries were are truly insignificant characters. If you take exception to this plan, please say so here. --EEMIV (talk) 11:20, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Template talk:Airnt

message: This is a navigational template for military aircraft categories.  'ntd' stands for 'nation', 'type', and 'decade', the three characteristics used to sort aircraft categories that this template is applied to.  Similar templates include Template:Airntd, Template:Airnt, Template:Airnd, Template:Milairnd, Template:Civairnd, Template:Milairtd, Template:Civairtd.  It uses  statements to deal with problematic nations such as Russia, which do not always have the same name in every decade.  It is meant to templatise the category scheme at WP:Air/C. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karl Dickman (talk • contribs) 00:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: You must specify the following parametres:
* : Must be exactly the same as the adjective in the category title.
**when it doesn't work, use additional parameter  (the name of the country, noun)
* : Use 'attack aircraft' or 'civil trainer aircraft', not 'attack' or 'civil trainer'.  Never omit 'military' or 'civil' if it is included in the category title.  Never capitalise this parametre.
* : Exactly the same as , but must be capitalised.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Karl Dickman (talk • contribs) 00:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: How to use the template

message: outputs parent  instead of . I looked at the code briefly but did not find an obvious fix. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:16, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Soviet and Russian military reconnaissance aircraft outputs parent Category:Soviet and Russian civil aircraft
Template talk:Usertalk-sprotect

message: Change categorization to  in line with other talk templates. -- Avi 06:19, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Ashibaka tock 20:56, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: Why are there ANY registered users in this category - particularly registered users who are at all involved in vandal fighting or dealing with new users. To make it impossible to be contacted via your talkpage is a very, very bad idea - all of these semi-protections should be removed immediately. Phil Sandifer 18:57, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WHAT?

message: Just wanted to let you guys know, there is a link to "Wikipedia:List of protected pages/User pages", which is an empty page. --ÆAUSSIEevilÆ 18:51, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the "/" is supposed to be a "#", but I can't fix this as the template is protected. Random the Scrambled (?)(Vandalism and other nonsense!) 15:57, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and fixed it.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Red link
Template talk:Protected template

message: *Comment The difference between these two templates appears to be that one is for indefinite protection, and the other makes no reference to how long the protection will last. If these are used for different situations (the way high-risk templates like  are indefinitely protected, but images on the main page are protected as high-risk only so long as they're on the main page) then I oppose the merge. I do not know if such a difference exists for the use of these particular templates, however. --Icarus (Hi!) 18:55, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested merge

message: I think that vandalism should be replaced by  to avoid the redirect in :Template:Protected template. Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 18:36, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avoid redirect 

message: An editor applied a specific pixel-width to this template a few days ago.  Why?  This puts it out of sync with most of the other protected-page templates, which are coded by the stylesheet to resize to a percentage of the width of the content area.  If the intent is to make it look nice as a three-line statement, consider that a portion of our audience will be using fonts of different sizes and spacing, especially as we start seeing high-DPI displays come to market.  Hard-coding a pixel width works against this... even em would be better here.   -/- Warren 00:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like this edit. Let's see if I can get his attention about this. Luna Santin 03:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Culprit here: Good point. Have removed the width specification. Thanks for spotting, David Kernow (talk) 04:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Width 

message: Does anyone think there should be a high-visibility semi-protected template? I'm only bringing this up because I have noticed MANY templates that are semi-protected from editing because of high-visiblity, with either no template, or worse, this template (which implies that it is fully-protected, not just semi-). Just felt that this might mislead some people, and it could be useful. Thoughts, please? Alex43223 Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C 16:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected template 

message: I've reverted the last edit on this, as it was breaking pages, besure to check all of the layers of transclusions such as Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:Hprotected before modifying. — xaosflux Talk 02:26, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. →AzaToth 13:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert