lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Lesbian actresses

message: Shouldn't this page be called "lesbian actresses"?
:a person who acts is an actor, actress is simply a pc term
::Yes, but a lesbian by definition is a woman, so you really don't need a gender neutral title.
:::An actor can be male or female.
::::It just sounds silly, imho.Nkm 13:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just about to make this topic here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.126.5.82 (talk) 04:59, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Actresses

message: Why is Ellen in the "gay actor" cat instead of lesbian actor? Has she never identified as lesbian? --JamesB3 08:07, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ellen Degeneres

message: They are both lesbians according to their own Wikipages???
70.19.82.80 17:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does someone keep removing the names of Liz Smith and Patricia Routledge

message: If they're women, they're actresses, i don't say that, English grammar, mmm, maybe Gaudio 19:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actresses again 

message: Categorizing by sexual orientation is non-encyclopedic and should not be done at all. The only time a person's sexuality should be mentioned is when it is a fundamental element of their contribution or professional activities. Otherwise it's often inaccurate, rumor, innuendo or serves only to titilate or serve an agenda. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.5.177.22 (talk) 15:37, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorizing by sexual orientation 

message: I don't see the edit feature.
She's already there. For anyone who wants to know how to add anyone else, here's how. Go to the article on the person and add Lesbian actresses to the categories at the bottom of the page. Louieoddie (talk) 11:51, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How can I add Nancy Kulp to this page? [[User:Stachman|Stachman]] 22:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 

message: I've been on several other pages for women who act and the word "actress" seems to have been banned from all of their pages. I see there was a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Lesbian_actors page that is used only has a place holder and gas even been deleted on occasion but I see no discussion. Where is the discussion that settled the "actress" issue for this page?--Dr who1975 (talk) 00:58, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The category was renamed following a speedy renaming to match the parent category :Category:Actresses here . Previous discussions include  and  and a broader discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 101#Actresses categorization. --Salix alba (talk): 06:11, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: How come it's ok for this page to have the word Actress in it. Seems like the word has been banned on wikipedia

message: What about Jodie Foster?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C5E:647F:EB85:B940:A5C9:E1F0:2ABB (talk) 23:21, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Jodie Foster?
Talk:Jamey Jasta

message: I started reading this article and I noticed it's said "Metalcore band" Hatebreed. And as you click on the Hatebreed link it says that Hatebreed would be Hardcore (which they are actually). So I will edit it. 91.38.60.188 (talk) 00:05, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: General Stuff

message: They were well founded and cited, and I would like to know who took them down. I will put them up as soon as I am amble to find the article once more. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.180.206.157 (talk) 05:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who took down the homophobia accusations? 

message: Anybody know what religion Jasta is? What's the deal with the band touring in israel...that's rare for a band...
Religion? Are you serious?
They toured Israel because there was money to be made there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.147.51 (talk) 21:26, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  religion 

message: Given that Jasta 14 was active and quite popular in CT in the early 90s, I find it a little hard to believe that Jamey was born in 1978--he would have been like a preteen around the time Jasta 14 broke up, and 15 when Hatebreed started. Can we get a reference for his birthday? Yilloslime (t) 00:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The birthday had been removed, and now it's just been readded. The only source I can find for his bday is http://www.jameyjasta.com/icepick, which says "Today is Jamey's 28th Birthday..." on Sunday, August 07, 2005. That would would make him born in 1977, not 1978 as previous edits had indicated. And 1977 still seems unlikely to me given the timelines of Jasta 14 and Hatebreed. A real source for this info would be great. Yilloslime (t) 03:31, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Age

message: I don't know enough about the details, but can someone update the article due to the fact that supremacy is already out there? The article states that it is about to be released. Thanks a lot.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.181.44.0 (talk) 01:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supremacy is already out there 

message: Nope. I grew up with that kid. It was a birth defect.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.147.51 (talk) 01:12, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost his thumb in a car accident?
Talk:Bubbling Under R&B/Hip-Hop Singles

message: This text is not accurate:
* if the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Singles & Tracks chart was comprised of more than 100 positions, the songs on this chart would represent positions 101 to 125.
This article should specify that the titles listed in these 25 positions are songs which have not appeared on the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Singles.  The above text is inaccurate because, for example, a song may be ranked at #99 but then decline the following week to a position that is comparable to postion #105, but because it has appeared on the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Singles chart already, it is not eligible for the Bubbling Under chart.
The Bubbling Under charts represent the 25 songs below position #100 which have not yet appeared on the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Singles chart.
* eo 08:20, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Singles Sales

message: Not sure if this article is accurate, it sounds speculative.  The whole "contrary to popular belief" section sounds like POV, too.  The R&B/Hip-Hop charts are indeed a separate core panel of sales outlets catering to the R&B market, but the Hot 100 encompasses ALL genres... R&B/Hip-Hop, Country, Latin, Dance, Adult Contemporary, etc., etc., so to insinuate that the R&B sales in some way don't count towards the sales totals that help to make up the Hot 100 sales component isn't correct.
Is there a source for this statement?
Speculative? Huh? Sorry, maybe I could have phrased it better, but I think you and I are on the same page. What you're saying is exactly what I'm trying to say, that this chart is only for urban markets and that the Hot 100 Singles Sales is for all markets. I'm just saying that the sales here are not an exactly subset (and many times people think they are). Like that if a single by an urban artist goes to #1 on the Hot 100 Singles Sales, it doesnt nessacarily mean that it will go to #1 on this chart, because its not an exactly subset. Another song could have higher sales in the urban market, but lose in the overall sales chart. OmegaWikipedia 14:58, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you understand what I was trying to say, I'm afraid I wasn't being very clear either - plus I forgot to sign my name, but that's what I get when I start critiquing articles at 4AM.  Just seems to me like the description of this chart needs to be more definitive to illustrate that only certain markets are monitored for specialty-genre charts (not just R&B, but country, dance, etc.), and the "contrary to popular belief" phrase should be taken out.  Oh, and this applies to the R&B Airplay chart article, too.  :)
* eo 17:05, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Red XIII

message: What species is Red XIII? Some sort of mthical creature or Puppy-cat?
:User:65.8.193.27 has been vandalizing this page. His only two contribs are criticizing the material in the Disputes section (diff) and removing the entire Disputes section (diff). I'm reverting it to the original because it was pertinent information. JD 09:35, September 12, 2005 (UTC)
::User:65.8.194.145 blanked the same section. Not sure if it's the same person or a different one. Same action taken. JD 09:36, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: User:65.8.192.117 blanked the same section. JD 11:35, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Species
Talk:Chiang Rai

message: Hello my name is Thithat. I live in Chiang Rai. I hope to make a good wikipedia with my home town.
Thithat 09:04, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Michael Freeman's Lanna (ISB 9748225275) the walls were really teared down in the 1920s, after being built in 1858 after the refounding of the city. And in 1988 two small section were rebuilt. But no mention of missionaries in that paragraph. andy 10:35, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: old comments from 2005

message: Hello, I am simply a Wikipedia user who has come to this page because of a friend's reference in something he sent me. I can see that Chiang Rai is about as far from Bangkok as you can go and still be in Thailand, but the map does not have a legend on it indicating the scale.
The location of the city relative to other places might be more valuable if Bangkok were included, too, I think. But I will leave more experienced Thai users to decide that. Rsperberg (talk) 15:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: The pollution in Chiang Rai is similar to that in Chiang Mai, because it's a regional problem. It's been in the (Thai) media a lot this year (2012), blamed for widespread health problems and reduction in tourism. Someone with good knowledge of the topic, please add this! AADM3 (talk) 17:06, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air pollution 

message: Can anyone make a nicer photo of the city to be used in this article? - Takeaway (talk) 11:04, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo for Chiang Rai

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 🏴󠁴󠁨󠀵󠀷󠁿. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 18:25, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "🏴󠁴󠁨󠀵󠀷󠁿" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Furvert

message: I'm not going to look there.  Can someone else visit http://www.fursuitsex.com and see if it should go here as a link or some picture off it?  I'm about to eat my lunch.  SnowConeYellow 07:43, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: User:SnowConeYellow is an obvious sockpuppet in my opinion. Just look at their contributions, he started editing about an hour after User:Arights stopped editing and asked Jimbo Wales right on to remove the block, tries to readd the images, etc. Just so you know. :) --Conti|✉ 13:39, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  fursuitsex 

message: Readers and editors of this article may wish to vote on deletion of the following images, which are or were recently used on this article:
*:Image:FursuitAttachment.jpg (Wikipedia:Images_for_deletion#April_10)
*:Image:Skunki Squibb yiff.jpg (Wikipedia:Images_for_deletion#April_11)
*:Image:Fursuitact.gif (Wikipedia:Images_for_deletion#April_11)
(I also need to post this here because at least one of the uploaders' talk pages has been protected.) —Psychonaut 11:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images for deletion

message: This defines a term. It can't really describe furverts, since most people don't reffer to themselves as such. Transwiki or merge to furry fandom? One of those. Thoughts? Lotusduck 20:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a wikitionary entry 

message: I'm not going to look there.  Can someone else visit http://www.fursuitsex.com and see if it should go here as a link or some picture off it?  I'm about to eat my lunch.  SnowConeYellow 07:43, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: User:SnowConeYellow is an obvious sockpuppet in my opinion. Just look at their contributions, he started editing about an hour after User:Arights stopped editing and asked Jimbo Wales right on to remove the block, tries to readd the images, etc. Just so you know. :) --Conti|✉ 13:39, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  fursuitsex 

message: Readers and editors of this article may wish to vote on deletion of the following images, which are or were recently used on this article:
*:Image:FursuitAttachment.jpg (Wikipedia:Images_for_deletion#April_10)
*:Image:Skunki Squibb yiff.jpg (Wikipedia:Images_for_deletion#April_11)
*:Image:Fursuitact.gif (Wikipedia:Images_for_deletion#April_11)
(I also need to post this here because at least one of the uploaders' talk pages has been protected.) —Psychonaut 11:38, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images for deletion

message: This defines a term. It can't really describe furverts, since most people don't reffer to themselves as such. Transwiki or merge to furry fandom? One of those. Thoughts? Lotusduck 20:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a wikitionary entry
Talk:Abnormal uterine bleeding

message: do you have a brief introduction of this topic?
: Added a header title to this unsigned section, the absence of it was interring with mobile view. Jebbles (talk) 00:45, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Header 

message: Hi! I'm fairly new to Wikipedia but I saw an advertisement on this page and got really mad. Please revert my edit if I've deleted the lines wrong! But also please delete the advertisement correctly <3 ヾ(_ _。）
CTK-230 (talk) 13:55, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Self cited research/advertising
Talk:Pistis Sophia

message: No Christian religion is monistic in the Dharmic sense of the word, ie pantheistic. The author/s of the current article appear to have misundertood the term monism in relation to dualism and within a monotheistic framework. In this instance monism referes to a single ultimate principle, which is God. Gnostics have always insisted on the absolute transcendence of God and regarded matter and the material cosmos as evil, a mistake or fallen. In either eventuality the Gnostic God is not identical to the cosmos, which is the actual meaning of pantheism. 
Gnostics would be horrified at the suggestion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.25.109.197 (talk) 13:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Monism is not Pantheism

message: Look, this article thus far is really light on facts and heavy on "supposeds." 
The subject material seems didactic, not historic, and suspiciously of the flavor of modern pseudo factual/historic philosophy.
So what are the facts? Is this document actually dated? Was it part of the Nag Hammadi? What is the context of the teaching? Was the concept of an 11 year post decease teaching only "high-concept?"
I might get back to do an edit.   The above comment was unsigned.
* According to   Gnosticweb,
:The Pistis Sophia was purchased by the British Museum in 1795 from a doctor and it wasn't until 1851 that work began on its translation. --Percevalles 01:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: </small>Note that there's scholarly debate over whether the Odes are Gnostic.  Just being quoted in a Gnostic text doesn't mean they're Gnostic, or we'd have to say that the Psalms and Isaiah are Gnostic too.  Nyttend 01:49, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I believe the section Analysis violates WP:NOTESSAY. Wikipedia is not a collection of personal essays, foremost not Primary (original) research. Wikipedia shall not provide analyses to provide any opinion. It is OK and well to review and refer to outside external analyses, but an encyclopedia cannot contain editor analyses. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 16:00, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This section is from: . Edit as you wish. Kramden (talk) 18:09, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

text: Right! Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 09:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "Analysis"

message: Sections First Book and Pistis Sophia may contain a confusion, section First Book claims:
:Unlike other versions of the Gnostic myth, such as the Apocryphon of John, here Pistis Sophia is a being of the lower, material aeons.
I believe there are two separate personae one Mother-of-the-Angels-Wisdom character variously called Pira/Barbelo/Sophia and another Fallen-Redeemed-Strayer variously called Sophia/Sophia Achamoth/Pistis Sophia, the Sophia of the lowest aeon. There is no Pistis Sophia in the Apocryphon of John, only a Sophia who is interacting with the invisible Virgin Spirit in some way. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 09:02, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Some confusion, perhaps?
Talk:Olvera Street

message: I reverted user:AfC who had put the new larger version of the Olvera Street picture at the top of the article.  At 800x600, having the larger picture at the top makes the intro text too narrow and hard to read. BlankVerse ∅ 09:30, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture revert

message: Construction has disturbed old burial grounds: http://www.whittierdailynews.com/ci_17306224 DocOfSoc (talk) 14:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Burial Grounds disturbed

message: To Whom It May Concern,
Hello. I am a university student seeking to develop and revise this particular article as part of a course assignment. In order to prevent possible misunderstandings I am leaving this talk post to introduce my username for any it concerns regarding the article's revisions, changes, etc. Edits will include an expansion/revision of the lead section, and addition of increased subcategories such as Characteristics, History, Tourism, and more. Expansions of existing categories will also be expanded, along with additional citations and references to accompany these edits. Thank you.Acarmona124 (talk) 20:01, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction + Edits
Talk:Glossary of Internet-related terms

message: Alot of this should be moved to wiktionary I believe... (Erebus555 09:33, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Also, in considering transfering this content to Wiktionary, I suggest using this link for internet terminology: . -- backburner001 15:43, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Seconded; this doesn't belong on Wikipedia. 70.64.123.219 (talk) 06:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

text: third.Panpog1 (talk) 20:12, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Transwiki to [[Wiktionary]]

message: Although copypasta is mentioned in Urban Dictionary and similar less-reliable sources, I can find no reliable third-party sources that mention the term. (There appeared to be some on Google Books, but those all turn out to be OCR errors for Copy ・ Paste.) The term may need to be removed. This in turn will require RfD for the page Copypasta. Cnilep (talk) 15:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copypasta 

message: Adding a quality request, even if this page is a glossary, it's still awful (spelling, tone and sourcing).  Arguably you could add citation needed on every item.wren337 (talk) 17:57, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  requesting cleanup 

message: The A-Z links to move down to those sections in the text do not work.128.100.71.45 (talk) 14:54, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  alphabetical links don't work 

message: I propose that Me too be merged into this article.  The only information at that article (after I pulled out all of the unsourced information) is an explanation of how the phrase was used, along with sources designed to guide new users (in 1994-2000) about how to use or not use the phrase.  As such, that article does not have enough information to be an independent article (per WP:NEOLOGISM), and should be deleted.  As such, I propose that we merge in that information here as a new entry on this glossary and redirect that article to here. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:09, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I forgot about this.  Given that there's been no comments in the past nearly 5 months, I'm going to go ahead with the merger. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:42, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The definitions of win and fail fail.  Surely the Jargon File has something better. And should mention epic fail and of course epoch failRich Farmbrough, 14:17, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Win fail
Talk:Censorship by organized religion

message: I think this should go up for VfD. At best, it should be redirected and/or merged. At worst, it should be deleted. Comments? -- A Link to the Past 09:33, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
Hmm.. maybe it should just be tidied up and merged with the "blasphemy law" section of blasphemy, as religiously-motivated censorship tends to be of things considered blasphemous. However, censorship links to this article, so perhaps it should be expanded? --StoatBringer 21:34, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

message: the "organised" qualifier is unnecesary, i think, especially with the rewritten definition the article starts with.  Doldrums 04:48, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. The word "organized" in the title is a problem. "religious censorship" Or "censorship by religion"?DanielDemaret 21:52, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  move to "religious censorship"? 

message: This article has been kept following this AFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:37, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD debate link
Talk:Individual action against global warming

message: "possible individual actions against global warming" sounds like a more appropriate topic title. 
:Now changed from original sociological considerations about greenhouse gases. Rd232 19:39, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: How could this article, written as it is, mostly in imperative sentences, be considered encyclopedic. If there's going to be an article on Individual action against global warming, then it should exist to describe what individuals are doing against global warming (with citations), not tell the reader what to do. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 04:15, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Therefore, I propose to change it into a redirect to Mitigation of global warming. - Nat Krause(Talk!) 05:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  An encyclopedia article?
Talk:Hyanggyo

message: Question of nitpicky variety: does the term 'medieval' apply to Korea? If so, how? Or does that simply indicate a correspondence to events in Europe? --Dan 21:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Medieval
Talk:Les Enfants Terribles (Metal Gear)

message: This site states Snake = recessive; Liquid = dominant.  Noisy | Talk 10:10, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
:You don't need a fansite. Here's an actual transcript of the game to prove it!
Script Jonny2x4 02:15, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Dominant/recessive
Talk:Andy Black (poker player)

message: I'm not certain about all that, and I half think his story could be a joke, or more likely subtly exagerated, it does sound pretty wild. I'm looking for confirmation now.
http://www.cardplayer.com/poker-tournaments/event.php?id=1228&screen=writeup&writeup_id=267 Evercat 13:03, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment
Talk:Hemipenis

message: Isn't it usually spelled "Hemipenis," at least in America?  Citizen Premier 10:36, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Penes is the plural of penis.. StevePrutz (talk) 23:06, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: We should put this on Squamata.--4444hhhh (talk) 03:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squamata 

message: Second picture when clicked, shows larger image but when that image is clicked, next biggest image is rotated version of previous two.--قیصرانی (talk) 16:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second picture