Talk:Self-replicating spacecraft

message: I'm looking for discussion that would consider the possibility that a colonization effort could broadcast directions to indigenous intelligence, a bit like the machine built in Sagan's Contact but getting them to recreate their self-replicating spacecraft, and for that matter recreating themselves. This would be the fastest means of getting around, even across intergalactic space.  Is this idea posted anywhere yet. Thanks, Ron Syme 66.242.94.154 (talk) 20:05, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colonization via broadcast 

message: It would be good if we put here also the Wolves/Inhibitors created by Alastair Reynolds in the Revelation Space series
and the Reapers (aka "Old Machines") of the "Mass Effect" games fame.
Spadurar (talk) 12:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions in the "Fiction" paragraph

message: I changed the paragraph concerning Iain M Banks' Excession, the idea of changing a Agressive swarm to a Evangalizing swarm was presented here (to my reading) as a main plot item from the book. Whereas, in the book, it is actually given as a example to illustrate how the Culture plans to deal with Outside Context Problems (although planning for OCP's is probably a oxymoron). The Excession object itself in the story is not Hegemonising (as the story is told, although if it truely mimics/replays the actions of those it encounters it might become Hegemonising if something tries to Hegemonise it). EasyTarget 13:30, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Iain M Banks' Excession

message: re: "The Borg are not von Neumann probes. They apparently don't even reproduce by non-assimilative means, according to later Voyager episodes." (edit comment by Bryan Derksen)
being listed in "see also" does not signify anything more than a similarity of topic... otherwise, please explain how "interstellar travel" is a Von Neumann probe... - Blueshade 15:32, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the similarity to von Neumann probes at all, really. They're not machines, they're not probes, andy they don't self-replicate. They're machine-like, but if that's all that's necessary then there are dozens of other fictional alien species that would fit equally well in here. "Interstellar travel" is not a von Neumann machine, as you say, but it does seem reasonably relevant to the subject of probes designed to travel to other stars - they must perform interstellar travel to do so. How are the Borg relevant? Bryan 23:48, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  the article mentions aggressive objects from Banks' Excession... they replicate and in the process are determined to turn everything into copies of itself... i thought the borg are somehow similar in behavior to this in that they also seek to turn everything into, well not exactly copies, but into beings similar to themselves...but ok, maybe you are right, this might be too little to justify inclusion in 'see also'... best regards, Blueshade 20:27, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  borg @ see also 

message: In the novel "Tides of Light" by Gregory Benford, a giant space-faring organism falls down on a planet and plunders its resources for the sake of reproducing itself. Hugo Dufort 09:51, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tides of Light" 

message: Could the Machines of the Matrix be mentioned as an example of these self-replicators, even if they aren't interstellar mahcines? -- Nick Begovich 16:57, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know of any evidence that they're spacecraft of any sort, so I don't see how they'd be relevant here. Perhaps at self-replicating machine? Bryan 03:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On a related note, I've removed the reference to Agent Smith from the Matrix movies, as he is not a spaceship, he does not explore, and the Matrix is not the universe.  This may be an appropriate example for the self-replicating machine page, however.--BlackAndy (talk) 11:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Machines in "The Matrix" 

message: The Changling involved a merged probe named NOMAD. It acts as a Berserker Should It be mentioned along with V'Ger and the Whale Probe? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.9.223.94 (talk) 21:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: IMO  V'Ger and the Whale Probe are quite marginal for inclusion here to begin with, they're not self-replicating. Perhaps in a more general "robotic killer spacecraft" article. Bryan 00:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually, I think V'Ger is a great example of a "Von Neumann Probe". In the story, the original "Voyager" probe continued out of the solar systme and crashed on a planet ruled by machines. The machines "repaired" the probe and gave it self-replicating capabilities, and sent it on it's way through the Galaxy. The original programming and mission was a bit scrambled, V'Ger was trying to report back to a NASA that no longer existed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.116.205.162 (talk) 20:38, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Startrek reference for Berserker 

message: "Another objection to the prevalence of Von Neumann probes is that civilizations of the type that could potentially create such devices may have inherently short lifetimes, and self-destruct before so advanced a stage is reached, through such events as biological or nuclear warfare, nanoterrorism, resource exhaustion, ecological catastrophe, pandemics due to antibiotic resistance, etcetera."
Did someone just make this up? It makes no sense, why would aliens have to worry about bacteria (a earth-based life-form)? This objection needs some sort of reference. 66.75.250.202 02:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is actually a good argument, but daily experience seems to counter it. Consider: Automobiles have appeared some forty years, or more, before programmable computers. Likewise did planes. However, in the meantime, computers have evolved much, much farther than cars or planes. For a long time, personal computers have been a common notion (which would be met with ridicule when the first behemoth mainframes were developed). And although cars were always supposed to be personal items, "personal planes" are rare, and "flying cars" altogether inexistent. The point being, different technological families evolve at vastly different rates, and it appears there are inherent limitations to how fast machines which require moving large amounts of energy can evolve. These include cars, planes, and, of course, weapons of mass destruction. So, the fact that we indeed possess cheap personal computers with enough computing power to autonomously navigate through space doesn't mean we have the cheap rockets to go with it. The only way i see that a cheap, do-it-yourself means of ending humanity could conceivably appear is due to powerful and versatile genetic engineering kits allowing the fabrication of custom viriuses.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.168.78.24 (talk) 09:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stupid statement 

message: Someone apparently moved the article to "Self-replicating spacecraft".  However, the lead still bolds the article topic as "von Neumann probe".  This is an inconsistency that should be resolved.  I see no problem in moving the article to "Von Neumann Probe", and if there are no objections/explications, I will move the article there. Robert K S 12:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a good reason to move the article as it encompasses more than just von Neumann probes. I'll give the lead paragraph a rewrite instead. Bryan Derksen 15:43, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Robert K S 19:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article move

message: The following paragraph is uncited and seems to be original research:
:A simple workaround exists to avoid the over-replication scenario. Radio transmitters, or other means of wireless communication, could be used by probes programmed not to replicate beyond a certain density (such as five probes per cubic parsec) or arbitrary limit (such as ten million within one century). Communication devices would be standard equipment on probes anyway, and thus only additional software, not hardware, would be required.
Not only does this seem like an unreferenced assertion, but it also misses the point.  If autonomously operating machines are subjected to forces of natural selection, then succesive mutations may cause the emergence of robots that break these rules (e.g. ignore the radio transmitter).  I'm tempted to delete this paragraph--what do others think? Alki 19:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The machines would undoubtedly perform cyclic redundancy checks or HMAC checks on their firmware, but those fail if an error happens inside the error checking code causing it to report that it is intact.  Generally it is only something that can be mitigated because in enough time Murphy's law has ample opportunity to cause multiple faults in redundant systems.  It could gain a great degree of stability by having several redundant and varied methods of error checking code on a single machine and if one or more of the checks disagree about the software's integrity, the machine shuts down. Abbail 20:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Simple workaround" = original research? 

message: Could the Titan from Titan A.E. be considered a Replicating "seeder" ships for inclusion in the Examples in fiction section.(IRMacGuyver (talk) 00:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Titan A.E.

message: I found a site which seems to be only half-ready but the content is extremely fascinating: http://vonneumann.tripod.com/index.html
The author has very good points about why would somebody build von Neumann probe. What do you think of adding a new section to article with a title "Hypothetical reasons for building von Neumann probe" or "Sociology of von Neumann probes" or something like that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.27.61.61 (talk) 17:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting article about von Neumann probes 

message: I don't remember from which book I read that, it was a while ago; But the robots in the foundation serie had sent machines in advance of the human race with orders of therraforming planets for the humans. In doing so, they destroyed a great deal of alien lifeforms. That earned mankind and the rebots the hatered of the remainig aliens (they were only uploaded minds tho at the time). Sorry if what i say is inconsistent I'm drunk right now.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.196.171.143 (talk) 03:08, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The idea of creating robots to terraform and prepare planets was discussed in "The Robots of Dawn" but it was the Spacers and not the Foundation who were going to do it.  The Foundation and the Galactic Empire did not use robots.  The only intelligent aliens ever discovered in the Robot-Empire-Foundation series were the Cepheids in "Blind Alley" but they were being driven to extinction by natural causes.  There have been quite a few books by other authors set in Asimov's world.  You may be thinking of one of those.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.25.34 (talk) 02:52, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: In fiction: Isaac Asimov

message: As far as I know the first appearance of von Neumann machines , sent at escape velocity from the Earth, appears in the P.K. Dick short story (1955) Autofac . These are not 'probes' in the sense of exploration, but I don't know of an earlier story of self replicating machines sent out as spacecraft. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autofac 
aajacksoniv (talk) 10:05, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a reference to Autofac, and to some other earlier sci-fi stories, in the History section of the article. --DrTimTaylor (talk) 19:55, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: In fiction: Philip K Dick 

message: Although biological, (ie. the characters' assertions that it has DNA) I think Lavos from Chrono Trigger could be a good example of a Berserker/terraforming probe. It travels to a planet, significantly affects the development of intelligent species, and monitors/records all species of the life that appears on that planet for millions of years. At the end of its monitoring, it resurfaces, in doing doing so destroying almost all life on the planet, and creates a new life form based on the DNA information it's collected over the years. Finally, it sends out its children to other planets with that information in their DNA as well. 
I put it here first because it would be significantly different from the other examples in the article, so I'm not sure it belongs. 64.202.157.11 (talk) 08:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chrono Trigger 

message: Someone suggested that my 2008 close encounter may have been a "Von Neumann probe"? I don't know, but I find the idea challenging.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AEzX4hw4tI
222.155.234.120 (talk) 08:16, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And has anyone suggested that you may be an idiot? I don't know, but i don't find the idea particularly challenging.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.168.82.183 (talk) 00:56, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was this a "Von Neumann probe"? 

message: Is there a sense of Hegemonising swarm sufficiently separate from Self Replicating spacecraft to justify its own page? Agingjb (talk) 08:47, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hegemonising Swarm 

message: Often new ideas emerge from speculative fiction. There is however a distinction between the work of a fiction writer and that of a scientist, even when the latter is speculating. There needs to be a sharper distinction in this article between such different kinds of speculation. Although the role of fiction as a way of thinking about this topic is quite important, it shouldn't interfere with the presentation of the concept.
I'd suggest that all ideas that have appeared only in fiction and writing about fiction should appear only in the fiction section of this article, leaving the rest of the article to reference primarily non-fictional works, and only mention fiction where this fiction has been incorporated by theoretical discussions. --TS 13:00, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflation of theory and fiction

message: Looks like some over-enthusiastic editor has deleted the 'in fiction' section. Stub Mandrel (talk) 20:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: In Fiction?

message: In essence humans are Von Neumann Probes, with the Malthusian capacity to increase exponentially in numbers and gobble up vast amounts of resources (viz. planet earth). In terms of Sagan's response then, surely the response of alien civilizations would be to destroy humans - and by extension any other self-replicating species - in order to prevent to consumption of most of the galaxy? 58.168.119.84 (talk) 02:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  If you define Von Neumann Probes broadly enough, they basically include all life.  I suppose the sensible restriction is that they are defined as spacefaring, and created by some other intelligence.  (But not necessarily full-intelegent in themselves.) So berserkers would basically be cancer - reproduction run out of control. Algr (talk) 16:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humans are Von Neumann Probes 

message: "It has been theorized[3] that a self-replicating starship utilizing relatively conventional theoretical methods of interstellar travel (i.e., no exotic faster-than-light propulsion, and speeds limited to an "average cruising speed" of 0.1c.) could spread throughout a galaxy the size of the Milky Way in as little as half a million years."
While I don't claim to understand the maths, I find this very difficult to accept. The Milky Way has a diameter of approximately 87,400 light years. If a single probe was travelling at an average speed of 0.1c, it would take 874,000 years to traverse the galaxy. Alternately it would take about 437,000 years for any number of probes to travel from the centre of the galaxy to the rim. And, of course, that doesn't take into account the navigational hazard of a supermassive black hole at the galactic core. 
So, even assuming that the probes originated from close to the centre of the galaxy, it would take almost "half a million" years to reach the rim, WITHOUT stopping en-route to colonise star systems in order to self replicate, assuming such probes could survive the entire journey. Considering that there are at least 100 billion stars in the Milky Way, and that the operating lifetime of the individual probes would require numerous stops for replication, such an enterprise would require billions of probes to be replicated in order to colonise the galaxy. 
All this would take time. The probes could, theoretically, traverse the galaxy in 500,000 years if their operational lifetime was sufficiently large, but I don't see how they could "spread throughout" it. Of course "spread throughout" is a vague term which may not mean the same as "colonise the galaxy", but just how long would it take for a self replicating probe project originating close to the galactic core (or elsewhere) to reach our solar system?
Maybe I'm overthinking it, and its just a typo... even if it takes half a billion years, given the age of the galaxy, there's still plenty of time for it to already have happened.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:ED9B:1101:A537:AF43:5410:B06F (talk) 07:40, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's definitely within the realm of possibility if they start near Galactic Center.   Even starting with a relatively small few probes if each probe stops to replicate on a planet and makes multiple (orders of magnitude) replications of itself and then spreads out from EVERY planet they stop in in a radial fashion.  Think of it exactly like pandemic spread on Earth via humans through air travel.  The more stops and chances to replicate, the faster and more complete the coverage.  CEHATX1 (talk) 22:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only half a million years? Is this correct?