lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Arash Markazi

message: Wow, nothing in here about his ethics problems and plagiarism ...
https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/business/story/2020-09-21/la-times-shaken-by-a-summer-of-turmoil-and-scandals  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:1514:584:AD0B:99F2:4924:7DD0 (talk) 15:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethics Trouble
Talk:Creative Loafing (Atlanta)

message: Redirected to Creative Loafing after a one-month discussion period, during which no opposition was voiced. Horologium (talk) 00:17, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Weak oppose, on the grounds that the Creative Loafing is the company that founded the chain of newspapers - but the Atlanta paper was sold "in July 2012 to SouthComm Communications". So, the paper still exists, but under different owners. So, it seems reasonable to keep the now-defunct company (which was notable for its other businesses too) separate from the current Atlanta newspaper, which has a history which has now diverged. Klbrain (talk) 17:35, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Outwood Academy Bydales

message: :my good friend attends bydales school and his uniform contains exactly what is said in the article,exept an optional piece of a black tank top.the disscusion on the matter relating to andy green, he also belives to be true, due to the plaque that has been mentioned priveously. --555hotline 16:33, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. But this is not acceptable. See WP:OR. Computerjoe's talk 19:59, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia articles must be supported by reliable sources, which are described in detail at the page Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Such sources must be independently verifiable (see Wikipedia:Verifiability). Specifically, we do not allow material which has been "vouched for" by someone claiming to be related to the subject of an article.  If we did that, we'd allow all kinds of random people to make any kind of claim they wanted, and Wikipedia's value would be entirely destroyed. Something simple and uncontentious like a school uniform could be supported by a page on the school website or school newsletter. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 16:44, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  my sources of information
Talk:Ken Robinson (Northern Ireland politician)

message: Notable as per WP:BIO: Political figures holding or who have held international, national or statewide/provincewide office, and members and former members of a national, state or provincial legislature.
This man is an MLA of the Northern Ireland Assembly - a national (or provincial depending on your definition) legislature Weggie 21:25, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to editors
Talk:Arromanches-les-Bains

message: Added "importance=mid". Although a settlement of this size would normally be "low", Arromanches' importance on D-Day raises its profile, IMO. Folks at 137 (talk) 19:51, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: WPCities rating

message: Some old history that used to be at the title "Arromanches-les-Bains" can now be found at Talk:Arromanches-les-Bains/Old history Graham87 08:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old history
Talk:Lotus 91

message: Is there any Lotus content in the linked (Japanese) web site? --70.101.16.107 (talk) 01:11, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't read Japanese but ... the first photo on the linked website shows a (black) Lotus 91 in what I presume to be Tamiya's museum (I'm guessing it's Tamiya's museum because I believe they also have a Tyrrell P34, which is what the the blue car next to the Lotus is). The second photo shows a 1991 Lotus sporting Tamiya sponsorship, in support of the statement in the image caption. DH85868993 (talk) 02:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Linked website
Template talk:Language phonologies

message: I grouped together the dialects of English (that is, Old English, Modern English, and Australian English) and Greek (Ancient, Koine, and Modern).  I would have done the same for German but I wasn't sure of a good term for the German German as opposed to Bernese German.  I think that this will make the template slightly more useful than just having the language phonologies catagory. Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 21:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since German phonology clearly states it's the phonology of Standard German, I'm labeling it "Standard". —Angr 15:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes from 28 January 2007

message: is the page for chinese phonology is non-existing or it is just not included in the template? thx.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.94.116.212 (talk) 05:48, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: We don't have a "Chinese phonology" page, nor do we have an "X Phonology" page for any of the Chinese dialects... yet.— Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 06:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not true, we have an article on Cantonese phonology and have since October. +Angr 08:22, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

text: We also have an article on Historical Chinese phonology, and I've just moved the phonology section of Standard Mandarin into its own article, Mandarin phonology. +Angr 09:08, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Touché.  The Historical Chinese phonology article doesn't strike me as a phonology article like the others.  Maybe it's just woefully undeveloped.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 10:18, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, in its current state it isn't very phonological. It just needs work. It's actually a surprisingly old article; it was created about six years ago - it's been on Wikipedia longer than I have! +Angr 10:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  chinese 

message: I think that English should have its own sub-sub-family within the West Germanic Branch, as its dialects are too unwieldy to be another bullet point. TheWhistleGag (talk) 02:13, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe; but maybe it would be better – and less arbitrary – to make a sub-family of North Sea Germanic or Anglo-Frisian langauges. --Tarnoob (talk) 12:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Seconding the Anglo-Frisian category. TheWhistleGag (talk) 20:33, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:East Central High School (Oklahoma)

message: used to be a prison  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.234.133.3 (talk) 23:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

message: This article meets the requirements for Start class. I have made this change for WP:Oklahoma. Bruin2 (talk) 20:40, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article class
Talk:Edmond Memorial High School

message: Victuallers 16:13, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Eureka, California/Archive 6

message: The article text states that the foundation date of Eureka is 1856, but there is no source. I was able to find information about the foundation and incorporation of Eureka in the listing of California Historical Landmarks for Humboldt County, but that source stated 1850 for the founding and 1874 for the incorporation (link - temporarily out of service, but retrievable from Wayback Machine or Google cache). I used the 1850/1874 dates in the infobox, but I did not change the article body to be consistent in case there actually was a more definitive source. Mike Dillon 01:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not entirely true. There seems to have been two incorporations, the original 1856 incorporation as a town and the subsequent re-incorporation as a city in 1874. Neither the Feinstein source nor the one I used really meet WP:RS, but it's pretty clearly verifiable. I've updated the infobox to reflect this. Mike Dillon 19:20, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundation date
Talk:Southeast High School (Oklahoma City)

message: We can assess again when there is more Victuallers 18:49, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yousef Azizi (Bani-Torof)

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Jreferee 19:19, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Eureka, California/Archive 7

message: There is no precedent for such development of specific fluid political issues. Let all interested weigh in here on the relevance and appropriateness of this unusual sectioning of a major city article. Norcalal 01:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the sectioning off of the Wiyot article is a very good idea. Refferences to this event appear on the Humboldt County page, the Eureka page, the Wiyot page, and (I believe) the Arcata page. I don't know that much about how to deal with these types of issues in Wikipedia, but it seems to me that so much repetition of the same event could easily be dealt with by a reference to a separate page. That way it would be easier to keep pace with all the facts that are important to the massacre. As to Law Enforcement, I am not sure who the original authors of this piece were, but I moved it to Eureka, where it at least seems appropriate, from Humboldt County, where it was not at all appropriate. Since then I have focused mainly on trying to keep the facts of the incident straight, but not on the overall picture. I think many of the points made about the overall picture are valid. I'm not sure how it should be done, but a separate article for this may be reasonable. In any case, I would also like to point out that there are a raft of articles relating to the North Coast region (Arcata, Eureka, Humboldt County, Arcata Eye, David Cobb, etc) that have been used for promotion of specific politics. This region is small and has a large number of politcally active and vocal people, many of whom are trying to fight for causes that may strike many people outside the region as completely strange. So in a sense a lot of what appears in these pages is the product of local political ferment. I know people who are historians in the area who would be very good candidates to write reasonable and balanced accounts, as opposed to those who have a political agenda. I have been encouraging them to work on these pages for a long time, but unfortunately they are all tech phobes. Barring that, maybe writers could sections that highlight interesting/ unique aspects of Eureka (like the architecture section), and people who are experienced in framing city articles could help in trying to make the article into a streamlined, balanced and accurate representation. --Metatree 19:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concern over expansion of very specific issues of Law Enforcement and the addition of a new Homelessness article in light of efforts to bring Article into agreement with WikiProjects US Cities
Talk:Deer Creek Public Schools

message: Regarding the merge of the sparse content in the stubby little DCMS article to this one:
*Good grief, yes as there's not much over there anyway. Of its three sentences, one or two could easily be deleted. And I see no reason to have that totally unsourced material over there in a separate article when it could just as easily be totally unsourced here in this one.  — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 05:06, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Deer Creek Middle School (Edmond, Oklahoma)]] 

message: When was the last time it was updated, and were could we find the up to date one to re arrange it given Deer creek is no longer 5a  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mypupivy (talk • contribs) 18:56, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The table
Talk:Geisenheim Grape Breeding Institute

message: 209.162.136.18 02:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: This seems relevant: "On January 1st, 2013 Geisenheim Research Center and the faculty of Geisenheim of the Hochschule RheinMain University of Applied Sciences merged to become the new Hochschule Geisenheim University."  Kendall-K1 (talk) 00:22, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hochschule Geisenheim University
Talk:B. Wayne Hughes

message: Hi, I have a few corrections to the B. Wayne Hughes page that I’d like implemented - I didn’t want to do them myself because I have a conflict-of-interest as an employee of the Hughes family. The proposed corrections in the Personal Life section fix multiple false and unsupported statements. Hughes did not have any children with Patricia Whitecraft. I have listed and sourced his previous marriages and their resulting offspring, and replaced weak and incorrect sources with supporting reliable sources. E.g. Removed Thoroughbred Racing (does not mention marriage), | an unreliable gossip blog and Washington Post (does not mention Hughes or Whitcraft). 
*In the Personal Life section, please change the first paragraph FROM:
 Hughes was married to Patricia Whitcraft until his death.  Together, they had three children: Tamara Gustavson, B. Wayne Hughes Jr., and Parker Hughes, who died in 1998 when he was eight years old, after suffering from childhood leukemia.
TO:
Hughes married Marjorie McKechnie in 1958. Their son B. Wayne Hughes Jr. was born in 1959, and daughter  Tamara in 1961. The couple divorced in 1975. 
He married Kathleen Becker in 1983. They had one son, Parker, born in 1990. Parker died in 1998 at eight years old from childhood leukemia. 
Hughes married his third wife, Patricia Whitcraft, in 2017. Wiki64gus (talk) 16:30, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done  PK650 (talk) 04:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life Correction
Talk:Michael Elphick

message: I took out 'A rumor was held that the development of Elphicks character of "Uncle Harry", after his departure from the show, that had impregnanted his onscreen niece was a result of his alcoholism on set.' as it had not been backed up with a source. If someone can back this up, then, of course, it can go back in. Jezcentral (talk) 09:31, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced sentence in Personal life deleted
Talk:Ronald Hovsepian

message: Hi Wikipedia editors, 
	
Footnote #11 points to http://investors.ansys.com/corporate-governance/board-of-directors.aspx. This link is broken. Here's the current one: https://www.ansys.com/company-information/leadership/ronald-hovsepian. Can we therefore update footnote #11?
Here's a footnote you can copy and paste.
Even though this seems to be an "uncontroversial" edit, given my conflict of interest, I'd prefer that an independent editor either approve it or implement it.
Thank you.
Signed,
BlueRoses13 (talk) 02:34, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've applied a  maintenance template to the article to signify to other editors the issues with the article's links. Regards,  Spintendo  23:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix Broken Link
Talk:Cuatro Ciénegas

message: : Cuatrociénegas is one of the only two biological reserves in Mexico (along with Laguna de Términos, in Campeche).
Um... according to CONANP, Cuatrociénegas is catagorized as one of Mexico's 29 Áreas de Protección de Flora y Fauna, not as one of it's 35 Reservas de la Biosfera. Am I missing something? - Eric 21:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biological Reserves
Talk:Mercerville-Hamilton Square, New Jersey

message: This was a great add, one I'd actually just been thinking about. I'd been considering an 'historic content' section. I wonder if Bill's Olde Tavern and the Kuser Mansion should be included? It's my understanding that both are also recognized historic structures. I also considered a listing of the Historic markers in the town, denoting the march of Washington's Troops. There are two along Quakerbridge Road in Hamilton. ThuranX 21:39, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Structures
Talk:Zeke Mowatt

message: Camelot sort if threw a professional insult too your very well trained business owner 2604:CA00:160:43E2:0:0:660:D4A7 (talk) 11:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camelot sort if threw a professional insult too your very well trained business owner ... After requesting a view of a prestige unit like yours was . fix pls father . ty
Talk:Edinburgh and Dalkeith Railway

message: Stewart 21:41, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I propose Innocent Railway merge to this. There doesn't seem enough for two articles. --91.135.14.165 (talk) 00:27, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: My feeling is that this should be the primary article, with the information from the informal title - Innocent Railway - being incorporated as part of it. --Stewart (talk | edits) 21:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I agree and as this seems uncontroversial I will enact this soon. --John (talk) 01:04, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've merged the pages and their histories. --John (talk) 02:00, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:List of first-class cricket records

message: Now that CricketArchive have decided to put up a paywall, would there be support for a move to (currently free) CricInfo archive scorecard links instead of CricketArchive scorecard links? --RobertG ♬ talk 09:34, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You can still access CA for free by hitting your ESC key immediately after you click on each CA page link. Don't hit it too quickly or you see a blank page. Routine to master is click–count "one"–ESC. Have fun. Jack | talk page 11:50, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't work for me. I would support moving all the links to ESPNcricinfo. Adpete (talk) 01:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  CricketArchive now a subscription site 
Category talk:Novels by Anne Brontë

message: ...but is it necessary to have a category for novels by Anne Bronte when there are only two?  There's not exactly any chance of ore being added to the cat, so it's somewhat of a waste, I think.  Should I prod it?  María (habla conmigo) 17:11, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Maybe I'm just being picky...
Talk:Ventidius Cumanus

message: Well, since the person who reviewed this article actually said something in their edit summary, i'll re-post it here so something is on the talk page: "Passed for GA. Meets all criteria. Solid, well-referenced, interesting article.) 09:58, 20 February 2007 User:Bookworm857158367". Homestarmy 20:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review comments
Talk:Summertown, Oxford

message: I am trying to remove a demonstrably false claim. Thanks
Vermeer dawn (talk) 11:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  TFFfan - please stop undoing my edits without explanation
Talk:Paul Edwards (philosopher)

message: The last version of this page said that it was taken from an obit written by Peter Singer for an Australian newspaper. At one point, it was written in the first person. Can any of the editors who have worked on this page say whether our article is a copy of the Singer article? SlimVirgin (talk) 21:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The text was inserted by an anon, so I've added the copyvio tag. I'll delete or revert to a previous version in a few days unless someone can confirm that this isn't a copy of the Singer article. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 21:54, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi SlimVirgin. I have access to some of Edwards' work so I'll check over any copyright problems. I also removed a WP:WTA (however). Its only a minor thing but as there may be a quotation solution to the copyright infringement problem (proper attribution) it seems relevant. AlanBarnet 06:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Alan. SlimVirgin (talk) 07:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem SlimVirgin. I took a look through the literature I have and there seems to be no particular copy there. I don't have access to the Australian newspaper mentioned above though. I'll have another doublecheck at any argumentative phrasing or WP:WTA in any reversions to priors you may want to make. AlanBarnet 07:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Slim Virgin, thanks for your edit of the Paul Edwards article. I have the complete Singer obituary, and can tell you that the text inserted by an IP at 14 Dec 2005 was an exact copy it. --Nescio* 14:53, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the information. I'll revert to before that version, then we can use the Singer piece as a source if we want to. SlimVirgin (talk) 14:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nescio, can you give us some information about the Singer piece so we can cite it, please? We need headline, who published it, and date of publication. Thank you, SlimVirgin (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See the German article on Edwards, note 3; see also the biblio for more info on his God and the philosophers.
BTW: If you read Edwards' article on Reich in the Enc.Philos., repr. in the new 2006 ed., you may see for yourself that Reich deserves to be treated seriously, and why – in contrast to what currently can be found in most websites on him.
--Nescio* 09:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyvio
Talk:Saint-Lambert, Calvados

message: There is an important confusion about this article between :fr:Saint-Lambert-sur-Dive (for the text) and :fr:Saint-Lambert (Calvados) (for title and infobox). Sorry, I can't rectify myself, because my english is not sufficiently perfect (see my user page in french).-----Ikmo-ned (talk in french page) 18:06, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion
Talk:Skewness risk

message: This information does not stand alone.  It both depends and expands upon the information present in the main article.  Logically, it should be part of that article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.103.184.76 (talk) 17:04, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.--202.52.234.140 04:49, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: merge this information onto main skewness page 

message: Skewness risk denotes an economical problem and should not be included in the mathematical/statistical definition of skewness.Rgomes1997 14:30, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.-- I think the inclusion of this article onto the main skewness page gives both subjects a better understanding. I agree that skewness risk does denote an economical problem but the fundamental content is one of general statistics. It should obviously have it's own section, but should be included (Arvindeyunni (talk) 20:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Risk should not be included in mathematical/statistical definition 

message: skewness article can just take care of skewness the concept itself while skewness risk is related to skewness, but not a part of it. Jackzhp 02:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merger might be not good

message: pysical meaning of Rku Kurtosis,Rks for engineering surfaces  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.233.41.249 (talk) 20:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rku
Category talk:Novels by Dan Simmons

message: I don't know if this is the right place to make a suggestion like this, but it seems appropriate enough, because it concerns multiple articles.
Could we add a box (would this be a new template?) to the bottom of Endymion (Hyperion Cantos),Hyperion (novel),The_Fall of Hyperion, and The Rise of Endymion, that ties the articles together1 ? (Could someone help me do this if no one else wants to do it?)
Also, I recommend the article titles (see above) be standardized to either all have (Hyperion Cantos) appended to the end of their titles(i.e. Hyperion (novel) -> Hyperion (Hyperion Cantos)) or have no tags (i.e. Endymion (Hyperion Cantos) -> Endymion).
1: I have both Endymion and Rise of Endymion in front of me, and they both reference being part of a single series with the first two books.
DriftingLeaf (talk) 15:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to Hyperion Cantos articles
Talk:Saint-Pierre-sur-Dives

message: When I visited the Abbey in 1992, I remember being shown that it resides on the Greenwich Prime Meridian. There was a hole in the window high on the south wall, and light would shine along a line grooved into the stone floor criss-crossing the interior of the building. I imagine it would only work on one hour of one day of the year, possibly a solstice. Could anybody confirm this and update the article if true? I checked the Lat/Long in Google Maps and looking in satellite view, it gives coords of 49.019972,-0.032836. I changed the Longitude to 0.000000 which puts the meridian about a mile to the east in a field. TimothyPilgrim (talk) 15:13, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abbey on the Prime? 