Talk:Top 10 (comics)

message: Should this be disamibiguated? Top Ten (comic), maybe? RickK 20:10, 22 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: But it's not called Top Ten, it's called Top 10. —Paul A 06:53, 24 Nov 2003 (UTC)

text: Yes, though there have been a few spin-offs since (Smax and the as-of-yet unreleased The '49ers). -Sean Curtin 11:34, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: When the first series ended, there was talk about this being simply the "off season" between "seasons one and two", as if it's a television series.  Alan Moore's apparently reluctance to continue working with DC Comics throws a wrench into these plans, though. -mhr 14:57, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Season 2 has started if someone wants to add it.  It's on the DC main site as well as some comic DB sites.  http://dccomics.com/comics/?cm=10417 --Morbid-o (talk) 19:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguate?

message: Some sections of the article, notably the officers section, do seriously need spoiler tags. (Is anyone qualified to add those? If so, where can I find the tag?) AK-17 15:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler Tags 

message: So, I put up summaries of the two main series. They cut out a lot of the subplots of the series, largely because that helps keep them small, and because I didn't want to give away every great minor detail of the story. Of course, if any can improve them, please do. Cybertooth85 16:29, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summaries added 

message: I say so on the basis of comments like "that add colour to every situation", "as bizarre as the citizens might be". Article should be in NPOV, citations should be added to explain each conclusion (even if it may seem obvious that this is a "superhero" version of League of Extraordinary Gentlemen). Written largely in terms of a fan's viewpoint, not an editor's. If you require more clear suggestions and help then put the article up to be peer-reviewed. Zuracech lordum 17:02, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a neutrality dispute; this is an editorial standards issue. Neutrality refers to personal opinions being added to an article like "this is bad" or "he's an idiot". The comments you refer to are more fact-based than you think; the whole idea is that the city of Neopolis is "bizarre" (by the very definition of the word "bizarre"). It is not "normal" or "every day", is it? Dispute removed. 82.71.7.96 23:57, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality dispute

message: :Image:TopTencover1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TopTencover1.jpg

message: :Image:TopTencover2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:TopTencover2.jpg

message: The intro mentions "Top Ten Season Two, penned by Zander Cannon."  Could someone who knows please clarify whether that means "written by" or "inked by"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.121.143.170 (talk) 21:04, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Top Ten Season Two'', penned by Zander Cannon.