Talk:FurryMUCK

message: How is it NOT notable???
this is an encyclopedia, if people want to know what something is, they look it up.  this is a term that is commonly used in the roleplay community and similar areas.
ESPECIALLY this MUCK article, as there are a few MUCKs.  it's notable.  CchristianTehWazzit
:Yeah, it is notable.  It might sound on the small side just looking at the number 450, but this is a notable place.  It's existence and place in fur and even internet RP history seems to be pronounced. Sethmandelbrot 04:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Strange as this may seem, Wikipedia actually demands that multiple reliable independant third party articles be provided as proof. Just saying 'this is notable' doesn't cut it. The Kinslayer 12:31, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thats a good start, but for the article to avoid a delete nomination, they need to be listed in the article itself, not the talk page. For best results, link directly to the articles and not to that listing. The Kinslayer 09:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  References in mainstream media added to article. Samboy 22:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely no arguements here, and I have to say good find! The Kinslayer 00:08, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability??? 

message: Hi! I'm starting on an expansion of the article - I never visited FurryMUCK much, but still have fond memories of the times when I did (well over 10 years ago now), and I'd like to see the article expanded. I've added an initial history section - it is a bit light, I think, but I'm limited to reliable sources, and while I think it is ok to use Tina Smith's (Jahangiri's) article, I only really want to rely on that for uncontroversial claims. I plan to add a bit about the CDA issue to History, as it seems worth mentioning, but otherwise I'm not sure where else to go in that section. At this stage I'm also thinking of adding "Audence", "Design" and "Influence and reception" sections. The last is fairly clear, as I have a pile of sources which can be used to build it. The second probably needs to be limited to design elements covered in various reliable sources, but that still gives a pile to work on - I have a fair bit on transport, some on communication, and a couple of the better known areas. Audience I'm less sure about, as I planned to discuss Furry fandom's connection to FurryMUCK there, but I can also see a case for simply including that in "Infulences and reception".
At any rate, I'm planning to leave the lead to one side for a bit, as each section will take a while to write. Any help, advice or opinions would be much appreciated. :) - Bilby (talk) 15:55, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on FurryMUCK. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927162630/http://www.pressedfur.com/press/muckity-muck.html to http://www.pressedfur.com/press/muckity-muck.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified