lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Belleplates

message: I am not sure whether this is a grammar mistake: "Belleplates are generally sold in sets of 12 (1 1/2 octaves diatonic) 25 (2 octaves chromatic) Belleplates to 61 note (5 octave) sets." It seems that this should be "Belleplates are generally sold in sets of 12 (1 1/2 octaves diatonic), 25 (2 octaves chromatic), and 61 note (5 octave) sets." --Number Googol (talk) 23:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if it's a grammar mistake or just a sloppy combination of 2 sentences, but I think I've fixed it. I don't know if it's accurate as written, but that's a separate issue, I think. |Godofbiscuits| 18:03, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  grammar? 

message: Here, "Bell plate" redirects to "Belleplates." Are bell plates and Belleplates really the same instrument? The bell plate as I know it (I have seen a bell plate) is a heavy, rectangular flat steel slab suspended by a rope, and struck with a mallet. I went to belleplates.com and they look quite different than bell plates as I know it. --Number Googol (talk) 00:19, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The belleplate pictures you saw at belleplates.com are what the article is about. I've never heard of the other type you're describing. Perhaps they have another name? If so, we may need to set up a disambiguation page for "bell plate" and set up a link here and a link to an article for the item you're describing. |Godofbiscuits| 17:59, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we do need do set up a disambiguation page. But all I know about it is that it is a heavy, rectangular flat steel slab suspended by a rope, and may be struck with a variety of mallets or body parts (e. g. knuckles, fingernails, etc). Does anybody know how we can get other editors to know about this new article so they can expand it, if needed? --Number Googol (talk) 01:16, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think, however, the article should be created at "Bell plate" before the disambiguation page is created so there are two actual articles coming from the page. Number Googol: Can you create a stub for bell plates? |Godofbiscuits| 13:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, I could create a stub for "bell plates." I'll go for it! --Number Googol (talk) 17:26, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome-- thanks. I updated the disambiguation on both pages for a little additional clarity. |Godofbiscuits| 19:01, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  really? bell plates and Belleplates are the same thing?
Talk:American Chopper (season 2)

message: Suggest adding text expansion about each bike.  Specifically, the "I, Robot Bike" article (copyedited down), since it's scheduled for demolition. 
The individual episodes are not notable since they are not listed by three established sources elsewhere as individual episodes.  The Season episode pages are notable, and I think they should have compact, concise episode information included.
For example: 
:The I, Robot Bike was commissioned by 20th Century Fox.  Will Smith introduced OCC to the movie concepts and film development artwork and sketches of robots, which inspired the futuristic, robotic looking bike. The Teutuls presented it at the film's premiere.  The bike also appears in American Chopper 2: Full Throttle video game, named Future Bike.
--Lexein 02:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lowden State Park

message: *Canoing book
*NIU article
*2002 Trib article
*Sacred Traveler book
*1951 Trib article
IvoShandor 01:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Windsor station (Connecticut)

message: This station is also listed separately as the historic Hartford & New Haven Railroad Depot as you can see at this link. I say it's time we go for another merger. ----DanTD (talk) 02:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also the [[Hartford & New Haven Railroad Depot]] 

message: However, it's listed on the NRHP as the Hartford & New Haven Railroad Depot.  Can we state that title somewhere in the article as well? Chrissypan (talk) 18:08, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like it was already mentioned to me. ----DanTD (talk) 18:33, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I like it.  :)
Talk:BorgWarner T-5 transmission

message: Copied this from main page, didnt check the original comment author: From lots of research i have come to find out that the ONLY 94-95 Chevrolet S-10 2.2 liter uses a T-5 world class transmission all other years for the 2.2 96 and up use a different transmission    — Preceding unsigned comment added by RickO5 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ford's 4R70W is an automatic transmission, and therefore almost completely irrelevant to a discussion of manual transmission. 71.95.232.228 04:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: True.  While the automatic 4R70W was the most common MN12 transmission, I meant to refer to the M5R2 manual transmission as what was used in the Super Coupes and early XR7s, and apparently wasn't paying enough attention when typing. Vykk (talk) 21:25, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mount Fuji Radar System

message: I can't believe they decommissioned this radar.  I was with the USAF weather service at Yokota from 1978 - 1982 and relied heavily on this radar.  We began to receive satellite pictures, probably around 1980, once a day but never dreamed it would take the place of radar.
It was decomissioned in 1999. The radome was relocated as the memorial museum in Fujiyoshida, Yamanashi in 2001. Summit observations were limited to unmanned surface observation. 
The replacement radars for Mt. Fuji were built in Kikukawa, Shizuoka and Chino, Nagano for regional observation. The geostationary satellite pictures are received hourly (as of 2007.) --Soredewa (talk) 05:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tea party

message: Just wondering whether there was a necessity to keep the section regarding Alice in Wonderland? It appears that there is not much relevance in the section, or perhaps there could be a section titled "Representation in literature".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Applesandoranges115 (talk • contribs) 08:17, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Alice in Wonderland Section
Talk:Dense-rock equivalent

message: This article could be part of Volcanic Explosivity Index. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 04:04, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Blackpool High Tide Organ

message: Regarding the image, would :Image:Blackpool_tide_organ.jpg be better? Or not? MattKitty (talk) 05:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image options
Talk:Bombard (musical instrument)

message: Does the bombard carry the same name in Cornwall?  I am leery about includine the two in the same article, as a shawm like instrument accompanying the bagpipe is commonplace all over Europe, in Brittany, Spain, Italy and Istria.  They all have their local names and are sufficiently different that they should probably have seperate articles. Calum 21:56, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cornish

message: To add to article: etymology of the French word "bombarde." 173.89.236.187 (talk) 18:06, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article 

message: What is the sounding range of this instrument?  Is it soprano?  Alto?  Tenor?  Bass?  What does it's written music look like?  What clef does it use?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.249 (talk) 22:44, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Range?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Bombard (musical instrument). (closed by non-admin page mover) The Night Watch (talk) 18:31, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Bombard (music) →  – To be WP:CONSISTENT with other instrument disambiguations, and because "(music)" actually fails to disambiguate (it could refer to a band, a song, a genre, etc., etc.)  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  12:08, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 July 2023
Talk:Tubby the Tuba (1975 film)

message: First, where is the source that tells this movie was the first animated feature to use CGI? And the quoted part which says "..., every day someone was creating something new. None of us slept, it was common to work 22-hour days. Everything you saw was something new..." I don't think this has anything to do with the production fo the movie, but a description of what was going on at the computer graphic group at NYIT at this time. This was a traditional animated movie, and I find it hard to believe computer scientists would be awake 22 hours to work on a film drawn by hand. 193.217.195.238 00:20, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A little confusion maybe?

message: Here is an interview with no other than Ed Catmull and Alvy Ray Smith, the leaders of the Computer Research Group at NYIT when the movie was made: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YjSExqtiIyg
Between 23,5 minutes and 24,5 minutes into the documentary, we hear that the computer group didn't have anything to do at all with the production, because the team of traditional animators felt threatened by the computer animators and sabotaged their involvement. 84.48.35.203 (talk) 08:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No computers were involved
Talk:¡Ay Carmela!

message: We've got three related items with identical titles (and I'm posting this on the talk pages of all three). The way they were when I started, placing them in chronological order, is:
Ay Carmela  [the song, the oldest]
Ay Carmela (play) [guess what, the play, which I haven't seen]
¡Ay Carmela!  [the movie, in which the song is sung several times]
The first thing I did was move 
Ay Carmela (play)
to
¡Ay Carmela! (play)
but I realized that isn't going to cover it. Also, the links to the pages seemed that if they weren't pretty confused already, they were going to get more so.
First of all, all three of these should have single exclamation points fore and aft. (Spanish is the only language that uses an upside-down question mark and exclamation point, and does so routinely.) The play and the movie are definite. The movie poster is reproduced with the article on the movie, and the cover of the Cátedra edition of the play has single exclamation points. And that's how they are catalogued in the library of the National Library of Spain (Biblioteca Nacional de Madrid).
There is maybe a little doubt in the case of the Republican (leftist in the Spanish Civil War 1936-1939, favoring the elected government which was unable to control or run the country, such that public order was pretty much breaking down)song. It was, for all we know (I don't think anybody has studied it), an oral song before it was written down. I'm taking as a reference the album "Las canciones de la guerra" (The songs of the [civil] war), published by the Spanish Ministry of Culture, where you can hear the song if you want to, it's the first one:
http://centros1.pntic.mec.es/ies.maria.moliner3/guerra/c_rep.htm
I don't know another reference source to turn to. I don't think El País's style guide, or the Orthography publications of the Academia, are helpful for a question like this. Anyway, the album (CD) uses exclamation points for the title of the song.
So all three entries should say ¡Ay Carmela!. But how to tell them apart?
First I thought of doing this:
¡Ay Carmela!   [the song]
¡Ay Carmela! (play)
¡Ay Carmela! (film)
which has the virtue of having them in chronological order, and directing the person looking for information on ¡Ay Carmela! to the song, the earliest.
However, on further reflection, this doesn't seem to be so helpful, because almost all users will start out looking for the film, which is, at least now (2015), and in the United States, more popular than the other two put together. So it would be most helpful to direct the reader looking for info on ¡Ay Carmela! to the film.
So I decided to name them this way:
¡Ay Carmela! (song)
¡Ay Carmela! (play)
¡Ay Carmela!     [the film, but without anything but the title]
Curiously, these articles are longer in the English Wikipedia than they are in the Spanish. I don't know what that means, if it means anything.deisenbe (talk) 20:25, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: The titles of ¡Ay Carmela! (song), ¡Ay Carmela! (film), and ¡Ay Carmela! (play)
Talk:Love Stories

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 02:06, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Love Stories →  – Not particularly notable, averages single-digit daily pageviews.  See dabpage at Love Story. 162 etc. (talk) 16:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 May 2024
Talk:The Lost Honour of Katharina Blum (film)

message: Outline of Proposed Changes: I plan to expand on the plot synopsis, going into further details about the film adaptation. I want to expand on the themes of the movie, as well as the motivations behind the plot in the form of a historical context section. I'm going to add more characters to the characters page since there are so few listed on the current Wikipedia page. I'm going to add a further analysis after I watch the film and have an understanding of it, as well as adding more to the further reading and sources sections. More changes may come about after I finish watching the film. 
Afallon17 (talk) 19:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Bertha Cool

message: I have today created a new page called Cool and Lam and merged all information from both articles, making both individual pages into redirects.  (see below -- this has been proposed for six weeks with no adverse comments).   I was instructed that I couldn't merge the talk pages so I will leave them as they are, so that people have a record of what's happened.  If anyone has any questions or problems, my talk page will be a good place to let me know. Accounting4Taste 01:49, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: MERGED

message: I've proposed to merge the Bertha Cool and Donald Lam pages into a single page, Cool and Lam.  My reasoning for this is that there are no books that have just one of them -- even in the two wartime novels when Donald Lam is servingin the army, he's constantly referred to and is an active presence in the novels.  All the rest contain the two equally.  Also, I checked out the Nero Wolfe page, and it contains Archie Goodwin -- a very similar situation.  Both are pairs of private investigators, both have one active "leg-man" partner and one "managing" partner.  I'm leaving this proposal up for a while just to ensure that if anyone disagrees, they have a chance to express themselves.  This note has been repeated on the other page that I propose to merge. Accounting4Taste 03:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merge
Talk:Hot Pursuit (2006 TV series)

message: Hot Pursuit on Court TV seems VERY similar to Cop's Uncut on UK tv ...
(HP - very pro US cops, CU - shows US cops in quite a bad light sometimes)
The style and the format is exactly the same.   I saw most of CU, tonight I saw an episode of HP and am completely struck by the similarities - it must be the same show with different voiceovers.....?
76.100.114.229 02:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Crankbait

message: This page had both the  and  templates.  These were not cleaned up after the article merge/move to Plug (fishing).  So I have deleted both templates now for cleanup.  Leave a message on my Talk page or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing for more information.  Thanks!   LaughingVulcan  02:04, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note
Talk:Nappy

message: In light of the scandal involving the use of the word nappy by Don Imus, we have had readers confused and angered by the fact that Nappy linked directly to Diaper.  As it turns out, Diaper is not clearly common usage for Nappy; "nappy hair" gets 1.71 million Google hits, in comparison to, for example, "nappy baby" (1.36 million hits).
Therefore, I have decided to Be Bold and redirect Nappy back to Nappy (disambiguation), even though I realize this may be controversial, given the page was previously redirected to Diaper.
I am available for discussion on my talk page or on the Diaper talk page (this message is cross-posted at Talk:Diaper and Talk:Nappy.  Baileypalblue 03:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirecting Nappy back from [[Diaper]] to [[Nappy (disambiguation)]]
Talk:Motorola Rizr

message: I think that there should be a portion added to this article about the public reception of the phone.  I got one about a month ago, and I have to say that it certainly looks cool.  I like the camera and music functionality, but there are many phones out there with comparable features.  The two biggest drawbacks are this: 1. Text messaging on this phone is a real pain. The buttons are recessed into the phone, and reaching the 1,2,3 buttons are particularly difficult because of the screen obstructing my reach.  2. The phone's UI is cumbersome.  It lags and sometimes will stall for a 1/2 second or more when using basic functions. 3.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but I haven't found a way to add words such as names, places and obscenities to the text messaging dictionary. This is perhaps the biggest pain of all.  
All the reviews I have read on the internet are completely biased.  They seem more like a sales pitch than a neutral, in-depth analysis. This is the one place I thought I could find some good info, but the article is decidedly incomplete.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.92.141.43 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 16 June 2007
:If you have a source that you can cite in the article, then by all means feel free to add the information! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 10:13, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  public reception 
Talk:Wool Exchange, Bradford

message: It's a dreadful photo - you can't see it. Secretlondon (talk) 20:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the photo for one from the Geography project site, a little dated but much better I think. Keith D (talk) 11:35, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

message: The Bradford Wool Exchange is prominently featured in the above referenced movie.  The actress Honor Blackman plays a television reporter narrating a documentary on the Wool Exchange.  Perhaps this should be added and linked to the film's article???  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_at_the_Top_(film)johncheverly 17:10, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film Adaption of _Life at the Top_.
Talk:University of Georgia School of Law

message: There was an edit at 17:54 on 24 May 2023 deleting “‘U.S. News & World Report’ consistently ranks the school among the Top Tier Law Schools, and among the most selective law schools”. This edit was restored per WP:HIGHERED REP including because “there is a consensus AGAINST a rule EXCLUDING all mentions of ‘general reputation, prestige, or relative ranking(s) of the institution’ in the lead sections” (emphasis supplied), the school is “exceptionally good” - in the top 20 (and 13th, top 5, and #1 in other rankings cited in the article body) of 199 ABA law schools, the reputation is widespread (USNWR, etc.), informative to readers, unbiased, accurate, and proportionate, is supported by the body of the article, has high-quality sources (USNWR and others in the body of the article), is not unduly weighted, is descriptive and encyclopedic, and has been part of the article for some time without editing. If you disagree, let us know. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 10:56, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reputation
Talk:Indian School, Muscat

message: Are the members of the student council really directly elected by the students, and then confirmed by the members of the faculty, or are they simply selected by the faculty members?  The article claims the former scenario. - idunno271828 (talk) 04:29, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student council 

message: has changed school behavior wise
interacts well
encourages 
allows leave applications though during times of exams under specific non harsh conditions  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.37.139 (talk) 12:42, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  a gem since achuthan steped in
Talk:Three Holy Hierarchs

message: Not that there is anything wrong with calling them 'Holy', and after all they were individually canonized, but the direct rendition of their title is 'The Three Hierarchs'. I don't know where the interpolation 'Holy' comes from (which implies that the rest are not holy??), but it is certainly superfluous, and I have removed it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.66.200.1 (talk) 17:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Both terms seem to be used; for example  and . The Blackwell Dictionary of Eastern Christianity refers to them as "The Three Hierarchs." I'm not sure what other scholarly sources say. I'm inclined to go with the term that is most often used by authoritive sources. Majoreditor (talk) 03:11, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three Hierarchs - Holy
Talk:Enemy Mine (novella)

message: One thing that struck me was the similarity between this movie an the movie Hell In The Pacific.  68.59.50.64 03:31, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hell in the Pacific 

message: Unless I'm much mistaken, this summary is of the movie, not the original novella.  There are a number of differences between the two.  Glc17 21:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added clarification to the article that the plot is from the film. I also removed the redundant spoiler tags. -- MisterHand 22:15, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary 

message: Why was this merged into The Enemy Papers? It was published in other places before that collection and is a standalone novel! 76.66.197.17 (talk) 06:57, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The novel: cf. Amazon.com 
76.66.197.17 (talk) 07:00, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: The cover of the novel version should be made into an infobox for this. 76.66.197.17 (talk) 12:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Covershot

message: https://archive.org/details/Asimovs_v03n09_1979-09  -- Wesha (talk) 06:40, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isaac Asimov's Sicence Fiction 09.1979  is in the Internet Archive
Talk:Alabama Court of the Judiciary

message: JBEvans 03:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)