Talk:How the Grinch Stole Christmas!

message: Hi-- Redirect pages are usually used for completely different topics that happen to have the same name.  But the Grinch TV show and movies are adaptations of the original book, and really belong in the same article.  
I've altered this article so that people who only bother to read the beginning of it will have it made clear to them that the article covers the TV show and film as well as the book.  
Maybe people who have seen and know about the movie might like to add some discussion of it.
I hope this seems reasonable.  Opus33 00:14, 16 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this is not a case for a redirect page 

message: I've always known the book as "The Grinch who stole Christmas", not "How the Grinch Stole Christmas".  Not really sure why and I don't know where my copy of the book is and Google doesn't seem to be helping me at the moment.  Also the film was known as "The Grinch" in the UK as far as I know. violet/riga 21:10, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is definitely the title of the book -- including the exclamation point. --Modemac 00:47, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You know, ever since the time I first read the book and understood the meanings of all the words, I always thought the book should be corrected to read "How the Grinch borrowed Christmas!".  Since he gave it back, he only borrowed it even if his original intent was to not return it.71.72.17.111 (talk) 20:40, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  So this is the title? 

message: Quote: "The purity of the verse is increased by the fact that Seuss avoided introducing made-up words intended to fit the meter (for example, "Jill-ikka-Jast" or "Sala-ma-goox", both from Scrambled Eggs Super)."  Well, Seuss did make up at least one word to fit the rhymes: the Great Big Electro-Who-Cardio-Shnoox.  But this is just quibbling. --Modemac 00:47, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Modemac, Your remark filled me with scholarly alarm, so I rechecked my copy.  A great relief--no "Electro-Who-Cardio-Shnoox" anywhere.  Is this perhaps from the TV or movie version?  Thanks, Opus33 02:58, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's the TV special.  In the very beginning, the Grinch describes the young Whos playing with their toys: "...There's one thing I hate all the noise, noise, noise.  And they'll make shrieks and squeels racing round on their wheels, they'll dance with ting-tinglers tied on to their heels.  They'll blow their blue-toopers, they'll bang their ta-tinkers.  They'll blow their Who-whoopers, they'll bang their gar-dinkers.  They'll beat their drum-dinkers, they'll slam their slew-slumpers.  They'll beat their flung-floopers, they'll slam their who-wunkers.   And they'll play noisy games like zoo-zinger-car-zay -- a roller skate kind of lacrosse and croquet.  Then they'll make ear splitting noises galooks on their great big electro-who-cardio-shnoox."  I was of the impression that the TV special recited the words of the book, word for word, so I always thought this passage was there in the book. --Modemac 09:23, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Modemac.  Opus33 15:46, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Electro-Who-Cardio-Shnoox

message: Is the Latin Translation really so important or relevant? I'm thinking about deleting. Charles (Kznf) 02:48, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it is one of the only translations of the book, and one that has been highly praised by classicists, it would appear to be noteworthy.Benami 15:34, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, Professor Tunberg (both of them, really) are hot in the world of classics (as hot as Latinists can be, I suppose). It, Catus Petasatus and Winni ille Pu are I think the only three books ever to make the Times bestseller list.  Definitely worth keeping. Of more questionable relevance is under the film part, the sentence about the word "Grinch" being in much larger letters than the rest of the movie title.--Josh Rocchio 05:50, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin Translation 

message: My inquiry is what town did Dr Suess base "Whoville" on.
My understanding in many of the Suess stories - Springield street names are 
used.   
Is there any history of what town "Whoville" is based on. --207.194.239.145, 21:55, 3 April 2006
No. Sorry.--Planetary 05:53, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Without a reliable source, there is nothing to discuss here. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:16, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whoville 

message: I am surprised that there is no information on this song (With the first line going Fah who foraze, Da who doraze) , other than a passing mention. I'm sure many people would like to know more about its origins. I found an interesting site (Christmas! The Story of a Holiday Hymn), but I have no idea whether it's true or not. Does anybody know more? Canadian Joeldude 23:51, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome Christmas (Fah Who) song

message: At first viewing, the featurette at the end of the 40th Anniversary airing last night was nothing more than the 1994 version with Tom Bergeron pasted in in place of Phil Hartman. Shot for shot and line for line. They even did the 'other voices' bit. DarkAudit 16:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This really isn't the place for discussing this but, I thought all that stuff was boring and pointless. Smiley4000 16:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  40th Anniversary Special ripoff? 

message: There's no mention of the controversy in the tv adaptation where the Whos in Whoville are singing a line that sounds like "Join the Ku Klux Klan." I'm serious. I seem to remember a big deal being made about it. On other pages with similar "sounds like" controversies, they at least mention it. I know that that's not what they are *actually* singing, but it's place in pop culture at least warrants a mention. -- 12.116.162.162 16:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No "Controversy" Section? 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 13:39, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: :Image:The Grinch.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:27, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:The Grinch.jpg

message: Forgive me. I'm not to this Wiki project. I should have read the protocol pages before making edits.
I believe that the following link is a justifiable reference for this article.
Adaptation The Grinch and Mr. Who
It is a clear adaptation of the original story and extends it meaning in a constructive way.
The link is not to a commercial site and it not being included for advertising purposes.
There are many articles with such links and I value them enormously as to many others.
Dbschell (talk) 23:11, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartoon Adaptation 

message: grinch is an english word originating from the title of this book. maybe that is notable for the article? 70.80.57.57 (talk) 23:23, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  grinch is an english word 

message: It looks ike someone messed up the opening paragraphs of the article. It says something abot a fear of children. Was that deliberate?
76.226.44.95 (talk) 16:27, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  opening 

message: Sorry I don't have any proof, but I distinctly remember seeing what later became the book, in weekly pre-Christmas installments in the Washingtom Post. (I was about 8 years old at the time.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.54.169.90 (talk) 09:25, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  First appearance of the Grinch 

message: I remember reading that Seuss was writing about his own feelings about Christmas when he wrote the book. Part of the argument was that it wasn't just a coincidence that he used the line "for fifty-three years I've put up with it now", and the book was published when he was 53 years old.
24.114.215.201 (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-autobiographical? 

message: The plot description here might belong to the Chuck Jones TV special and not the book, according to the version of the text here: http://web.mit.edu/tere/www/text/grinch.txt
But the illustrations may fill in some elements that are missing in the words. I don't have the book here, so maybe someone else who has it can check?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Belmontian (talk • contribs) 18:36, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot