lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Radio stations in the United Kingdom

message: For me, this page is only displaying as far down the list as Trax FM. I'm using Camino on a Mac - is anyone else having this problem, and how can it be fixed? Smileyrepublic 21:35, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Only displaying up to T

message: True or false: Unlike U.S. radio stations, U.K. radio stations have no callsign. 66.245.107.72 19:48, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: So they do, but they aren't popularly used as in the states. Mr. Jones 14:43, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do UK stations have callsigns? 

message: Smb1001, did you hand enter the pages you created or use a bot? Do you know about the pywikipediabot and others? Mr. Jones 14:43, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generated pages? 

message: At the moment we have three subcategories on the front page
* BBC local radio
* BBC national radio stations
* Hospital Radio Stations
Does anyone else agree that we beed to split these more by adding the following categories as well?
* Community radio stations
* Commercial radio stations
* Student radio stations
At the moment there is no obvious way to group these together when viewing the category pages
KevS 08:17, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sub Categories
Talk:Cessna 150

message: The statement "Production of the 152 ended in 1985 when manufacturing of all Cessna piston singles was suspended" is in conflict with the Cessna 172 page, which states the 172, also a piston single engine, continues in production, "Produced 1996–present". HistorySherlock (talk) 14:15, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope both statements are correct. Cessna suspended all piston engine production in 1985 and then restarted it in 1996 after the regulatory environment was amended. - Ahunt (talk) 14:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict statement  

message: Fun fact: dont eat the plane.
M. Lotito should have a link here, one line saying that its the only plane to be eaten by a person. 49.183.64.30 (talk) 23:24, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The stunt is notable to the person who performed it, Michel Lotito, but it is not notable to the aircraft type. See also WP:TRIVIA. - Ahunt (talk) 00:23, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lotto.
Talk:"Weird Al" Yankovic

message: is not Olivia Wilde. It's Evan Rachel Wood. but I can't edit. No account. I'm sure someone can though. 2603:6010:9305:7B00:95C:5388:35C8:9 (talk) 12:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The original short had Wilde as Madonna, the film had Wood as her. This is properly stated in the same paragraph about both actresses. Masem (t) 12:49, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madonna Actress 

message: Smells like Nirvana was in the 1992 MTV "Best Male Video" nominees but Nirvana's video was not, it was in nominees for "Best Video" 70.187.141.56 (talk) 18:19, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best Male Video 

message: Why is his wife and marriage not listed in the top section, but is in the early life section? 172.56.113.56 (talk) 18:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead of any Wikipedia article is intended as a summary of the most important information about a topic (explaining why the topic is notable), and should be fairly short. Most of the time, the personal lives of people with Wikipedia articles are not what make them notable, and so they are not usually included in the lead if there is a lot of other information that needs to be conveyed, as there is in the case of this article.  Tollens (talk) 19:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 May 2024 

message: citation 89, 90 are incorrect.  As for the concert on the day of weird Al parents death is located in Mankato, Minnesota. Not Appleton, Wisconsin.  I know this because I was there. But also for citation purposes: 
https://www.ilxor.com/ILX/ThreadSelectedControllerServlet?boardid=41&threadid=28420 Jillianmcp (talk) 04:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird al concert location on day of parents death
Talk:Face Dancer

message: Does anyone know specifically where in Frank Herbert's original series he references Face Dancer control via whistling?
From the article: They can be controlled by being forced into a hypnotic state with some predefined sound (often a specific whistling noise).
I believe the first reference to whistling commands may be in Chapterhouse, when Scytale sees an opportunity to control/influence the Idaho ghola and thus effect his escape from the Bene Gesserit when he thinks:
Somehow, I must contrive it that Idaho and I meet intimately.  There's always the whistling language we impress on every ghola.
BUT, this relates to gholas. And of course as early as Messiah it's revealed that the Tleilaxu control gholas with words and such (Hayt), but ... In any case, this is up for discussion in the Daniel and Marty article, and I'd like to add a reference here as well if we can find one. TAnthony 05:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Whistling

message: Does anybody realize that "Face Dancers" refers to a traditional Chinese performing art? The performer will use slight-of-hand to remove a series of masks with a flourish of a sleeve or cape, finally revealing the face. Herbert must have known about this.Dawud (talk) 15:12, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Face Dancers" in Chinese culture
Talk:Zündapp

message: I'm no expert on motorcycles, so I'd like someone to check that fully suspended drive is indeed the correct translation for "Kardanantrieb" and to figure out where it should link to (or whether that page indeed still needs to be written). Also, someone knowing the company's history could expand it beyond 1958 — the German text at :de:Zündapp was too subjective and POV for my taste (and doesn't exactly provide any hard facts about the later history of the company). Lupo 20:34, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please use these links as appropraiate to add  citations to this article:
*Wildeman-Zündapp
*Zündapp Owners' Club
*Zündapp Two-stroke Owners' Club
*http://www.krad-register.deThe WH-Krad Registry
*Zündapp history (in English).
*The KS750 Wehrmachtsgespann (in English).
*Zündapp Bella scooters.
*http://www.kastenrahmen.de (in German)
*Nürnberg Motorcycle Museum (in English)
*Meisterdinger von Nürnberg Zündapp webpages
*Motorcycle Classics article on 1937 Zundapp KKS500
--Dbratland (talk) 17:32, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  list of deleted external links 

message: Kardanantreib is "shaft drive". Specifically, it refers to shaft drive using cardan (Kardan in German) joints, which is another name for simple U joints. 76.11.81.207 (talk) 20:29, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  @Lupo: Kardanantreib
Wikipedia talk:Two versions

message: Oppose.  Wikipedia should not have warring versions of articles.  RickK 21:14, Sep 3, 2004 (UTC)
:But it does.  The hope is to make it more peaceable. VV 21:44, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This looks a hell of a lot better than this. VV 21:46, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: Perhaps instead of two versions, the reversion/non-reversion wars can be temporarily handled by having the proposed reversion present but highlighted in red, with a notice in red to note that the text is being disputed by proposing reversion and not by proposing balancing text.--Silverback 03:54, 1 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been a problem, but I'm not sure it's insurmountable.  Also, another idea I had was for this or something like it to be used on protected pages, so a reader can be quickly directed to the "other" version, thus hopefully mitigating the effects of protecting the "wrong version". VeryVerily 21:27, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  reversion/non-reversion wars can be handled more simply 

message: Encouraging POV forks? No. Bang the problem editors' heads together, don't punish the article for their sake - David Gerard 09:52, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Worst. Idea. Ever.

message: POV forks are much preferred over denying the existence of dispute. zen master T 16:13, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two versions is good 

message: I would say Three versions are more approriate.  (Ironickly I actualy am serious)
The Main Version would be the earlyer version.  People With srong opinions should creat a sub artile like /A's POV /B's POV and not have an edit war on the main page but not leave out any POV.  I'm not saying to go with any POV but just to have an artile about the POV so people know what others are arguing about--E-Bod 04:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three versions
Talk:Gillion

message: What is the history of the "G" at the beginning of this word?? Using the same system, what is a more complete list of numbers using this system??
American name = Gillion name
*Billion = Gillion
*Trillion =
*Quadrillion =
*Quintillion =
*Sextillion =
*Septillion =
*Octillion =
*Nonillion =
*Decillion =
66.245.116.108 22:03, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: Google does more than 10,000 results for this word, and among the first few, a pretty large majority talk about this word as meaning 10^9 on the basis of mega/million. (Note that I also e-mailed this information to Rowlett himself, but I got a response saying he is away from the office and won't be able to respond until October 15.) This must mean that this word is gradually becoming somewhat genuine. Any comments about this?? 66.245.96.130 16:56, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Search
Talk:Before These Crowded Streets

message: The citation for the Pantala Naga Pampa explanation needs to be fixed. Also, as an Indian, I am confident there is no language called "Indian". India has a multitude of languages, so maybe the sentence could be reworked to something like "pantala naga pampa, in an Indian language, means...". --Snaxe920 06:01, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/NHL Entry draft format

message: Minor point: the transition tables are different from the ones used in the NHL seasons.  The ones I've written are done using this:

<div style="border:1px solid black; padding:2px;">
<div style="float:left">Preceded by: [[1918-19 NHL season]]</div>
<div style="float:right">Followed by: [[1920-21 NHL season]]</div>
<div style="text-align:center">[[List of NHL seasons]]</div>
</div>
So that it looks like this:
Preceded by: 1918-19 NHL season
Followed by: 1920-21 NHL season
List of NHL seasons
Despite the unwiki-like HTML code, it does take up the entire width of the article section, and it does look a lot cleaner (no tables, for one).
Do we need a unified way of showing article series? kelvSYC 22:21, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: A section about draft day trades should also be included, since they often play a pivotal role in the draft, especially if Mike Milbury is involved.
I'm going to add that section to some of them.
I added some draft day trades to the 2003 NHL Entry Draft.  Are they in a good spot before the picks, or should they be at the bottom of all the picks? Bigdottawa 15:51, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft Trades 

message: I think that the formatting of the drafts should look more like the 2005 Draft than what the template actually uses because, if the template from the WikiProject Ice Hockey is used, when a draft picks nationality is shown it takes up two lines for country names that are two words such as United States or Czech Republic.  Does this seem like the official template should be changed in regards to this? MBob 03:52, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improved Format 

message: The text in the Draft List section seems outdated. The guidelines seem to be based on criteria different from WP:HOCKEY/PPF#NOTE. The draft articles themselves seem to implement the format in various ways. --Bamsefar75 (talk) 14:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think its just a case of this being written well before anyone came up with the notability guidelines. I have made somewhat of an adjustment who how it was worded. Feel free to rewrite it better if you can. -Djsasso (talk) 23:07, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability for linked players 

message: A discussion has been underway regarding the update and subsequent revamping of the NHL Amateur / Entry Draft Series of pages. So far 1963 NHL Amateur Draft - 1978 NHL Amateur Draft pages have been expanded and redesigned. References and minor cosmetic changes continue to take place daily within this updated format. I'm opening discussion here prior to changing the existing project page to reflect these new format changes. Slysplace  talk ♫ 00:47, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and revamping of Draft pages
Talk:Raising Arizona

message: Hello, we are scholarly student editors here to make positive changes <3
Primary minor improvements
Firstly we are looking to add basic improvements to the figures, using information that is readily available on the 'Raising Arizona' IMDb page (as it seems silly to not transfer this information to this page). 
The budget currently says "$6 million", but we're suggesting that it would be more accurate to have "$6 million (estimated)" written under Budget instead. This will make the information that is currently given clearer and more precise.
The figure of Box Office can also be clearer, as it currently says “$29 million” and “$29.2 million” would be more precise.
We are also looking to improve the cast section. Currently, the character "Hi"'s name isn't specific enough in the cast section (Nicolas Cage as HI McDunnough), and it is in fact more specific elsewhere in the article (Herbert I. "Hi" McDunnough (Nicolas Cage)). It would be useful to have the character's full name here in the cast section, as it is the place in which this information seems most relevant. We would also look at adding small descriptions for each of the characters, as not all of them are recognisable by the actors that play them so this information would be relevant and useful.
In terms of our next improvements, we are also looking to improve bigger sections, particularly the introduction and Production parts of the article, with research. Plus we will be checking the references used in the article to make sure that they are valid. 
Uma Ghelani (talk) 18:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi group. Great to see you've introduced yourselves! Please could you edit the passage above to make sure you include links to your user names and talk pages? I also think that at the moment you seem to be focussing mainly on writing exercises, rather than editing. Try to think about the assignment as an editing project, aiming to improve the scholarly quality of the article as a resource - that means fact-checking and providing high quality sources like peer reviewed articles, books and book chapters. This should help you more than some of the more minor changes you're proposing above. I hope that helps - all best and good luck! DrJennyCee (talk) 22:45, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education Project
Talk:Interstate 495

message: This page was originally a simple disambiguation page.  It has recently grown but the related pages were not merged and redirected into this page.  There should probably be a discussion here about whether this page is better as a disambiguation page (see this version in history) and the content distributed to sub-articles or as a single article with the full discussions as sections here (see, for example, this version). Rossami 22:28, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Capital Beltway and the vfd page for my opinions in full. Briefly, I think this should be like all the other three digit interstate articles and have a section for each separate segment. I have no problem with have brief sections with links to the LIE and the Beltway articles for a fuller treatement, but I really dislike seeing non-standard named highways showing up in :Category:U.S. Interstate Highway system. older ≠ wiser 23:33, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Attribution

message: From VfD:
vfd'ed by User: Fennec on March 25, 2004 persumably for merge to copyright and/or intellectual property.  Dont see the vote or discussion in the old archives. -Vina 22:32, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: Please note that in this edit summary, I meant MOS:NOTED rather than WP:NOTED. A bit more about why I reverted: the problematic use of the word “actually” is that of correcting the reader, which is not the case here. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 08:02, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Actually”
Talk:Carl Wernicke

message: This man was born in Silesia, which at that time was not part of Poland (there was no Poland), but instead part of the Austrio-Hungarian Empire.  He was educated in what is now Germany, practiced medicine in what is now Germany, served as a German-speaking army physician in the Franco-Prussian War, and, most important, wrote his landmark works entirely and exclusively in German.  He died in what is now Germany.
Why is he categorized as a Polish neurologist?  He might as well be categorized as an Austrio-Hungarian neurologist, or a Habsburg neurologist, or a Prussian neurologist.  If one were going to select a country as of 2006 to which he would profess allegiance, how could you pick anything other than Germany?  -ikkyu2 (talk) 05:07, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Karl Wernicke was German and simply isn't a subject of legitimate dispute. His town of birth is now part of Poland, but that is a completely different subject. Ujalm 19:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish vs. German
Talk:American Cocker Spaniel

message: The first spaniel in America came across with the Mayflower in 1620, but it was not until 1878 that the first Cocker Spaniel was registered with the American Kennel Club (AKC). A national breed club was set up three years later and the dog considered to be the father of the modern breed, Ch. Obo II, was born around this time. By the 1920s the English and American varieties of Cocker had become noticeably different and in 1946 the AKC recognized the English type as a separate breed. It was not until 1970 that The Kennel Club in the UK recognized the American Cocker Spaniel as being separate from the English type. The American Cocker was the most popular breed in the United States during the 1940s and 1950s and again during the 1980s, reigning for a total of 18 years. They have also won the best in show title at the Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show on four occasions, the best in show title at Crufts in 2017, and have been linked to the President of the United States on several occasions, with owners including Richard Nixon and Harry S. Truman. In 2013, the cocker spaniel ranked 29th the American Kennel Club registration statistics of historical comparisons and notable trends. 2601:18B:C100:93D0:2DA9:FCE9:9422:6BFE (talk) 23:38, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  american cocker spaniel 

message: American Cockers' previously high popularity resulted in the breed frequently being bred by backyard breeders or in puppy mills. This indiscriminate breeding has increased the proliferation of breed related health issues in certain bloodlines. ref name="coile11"
I've removed this paragraph due to it not meeting the standards for WP:MEDRS but it'd be fine in another section without the claim that backyard breeders are responsible for breed health issues. The author does not have any authority or expertise to make this assertion and it puts blame away from kennel club breeders. Traumnovelle (talk) 23:09, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed paragraph from health.
Talk:Kotobagari

message: This is an English wikipedia. And Kotobagari is not English.
Kotobagari is a category of Political correctness or politically_incorrect in English.
You can make the item about a Kotobagari to Political_correctness.
Please refer to japan of Pofanity as the example -- it will become helpful.
:That's fine, Snow steed, but you could at least move the article to the right location, instead of just deleting it. - Sekicho
How is ハングル語 a misnomer of the Korean language?
:Because that would be like calling Japanese kanjigo or perhaps kanago Nik42 02:59, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Or calling English "Alphabet language." --Kjoonlee 06:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which would be quite in line with European names for each other's countries and languages anyway. Glaring examples such as the word "mute" (suggesting an inability to speak a familiar language) still meaning German (language, person, or origin; but not country) in Russian come to mind, but there's oh so many. Or the even more popular reverse examples, like the turkey (American bird) being named after Turkey (country) to simply mean "Weird, bizarre, alien-looking", or America misnaming the Musk Duck as the Muscovy ("of Moscow Region") Duck, despite its American origins.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.127.70.219 (talk) 10:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: This is an English wikipedia

message: Regarding the section on the use of "Hangul" to refer to spoken Korean: I don't think this qualifies as a neologism, which I understand to mean the creation of an entirely new word. In this case, an existing word has taken on an additional meaning. Surely there's a linguist or grammarian or etymologist out there who knows the proper term for this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.203.175.235 (talk) 02:56, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neologism? 

message: I just removed the merge notice since Kotobagari has its own separate article  in the French, Korean, and Japanese wikipedias.
Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 07:17, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge notice removed

message: Many of the examples seem to have no relation to 'PC', aggrandising job titles is not particularly a 'PC' phenomenon, avoiding 'disability pejoratives' and metaphors might be if avoiding offence is the reason, but no reason is given here. The inability for two states to agree on a name is a naming dispute, not dissimilar to Macedonia, which is political, but not 'PC'. The relationship to 'PC' seems arbitrary and largely unsourced. Pincrete (talk) 19:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not 'PC"
Talk:Warda Al-Jazairia

message: I'm pretty sure I screwed up Warda's name in Arabic, maybe someone who actually knows arabic could fix that. --Johnkarp 23:30, 3 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It's good. --212.139.115.49 20:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Translating her name as "The Algerian Rose" is not correct. While her first name, Warda, means rose in Arabic, it's not used here as a descriptive noun. It's just used as a person's first name (much like a woman called Rose). If the name is to be literally translated it should be "Rose the Algerian" or "Rose from Algeria", but this is not how it's perceived in the Arab world. --Jak123 (talk) 20:47, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Internet searches show that a very large number of blogs, newspapers and other news outlets, and even books, use that epithet. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I see! Your edits are a good compromise. I'm not sure about the source of this translation though. Warda used to sing in Egyptian dialect and little emphasis is given to her Algerian origin when discussing her as a singer. I think that translating it as "The Algerian Rose" puts too much emphasis on her origin. Anyways, thanks for the edits. --Jak123 (talk) 19:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a translation but an epithet. I doubt that those who used it had any idea about dialects or her origin and its significance or lack of it. It's quite understandable that a singer named "Rose the Algerian" will be dubbed "The Algerian Rose". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:35, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Algerian Rose?? 