lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Periods in Western art history

message: * Early (pre-Modern) periods are weak
* The list is Western-centric. Needs to be either labeled as such or expanded.
-->>sparkit|TALK<< 14:59, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
I added 'Western' to lead, though expansion seems to me a better route. -->>sparkit|TALK<< 15:42, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
::Definitely requires expansion in elaboration of current and addition of earlier periods and other civilizations. 216.124.224.224 17:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: Fellow Wikipedians, 
a few of us are collaborating on the article girl this week, and would like to add a section about "the girl in art". If any of you who are familiar with art history of various periods would like to come over and assist, we would welcome you! We're working on a draft section on the talk page. Mamawrites 08:58, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaboration of the Week: [[Girl]] 

message: Art movements are usually defined as modern/contemporary and western, but periods are simply units of time.  As such, "modern" is a period but "inpressionism" is a movement within that period.  To that extent there should either be 2 pages--one for movements and one for periods--or movements should be embedded within the modern period.  
--Mortaddams 15:36, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between periods and movements 

message: There should be a brief explenation of what each period constitutes. For example the period from Renaissance to Romanticism was caracterised by strong influence from classical antiquity. If one looks at paintings from the mannerism, baroque, roccoco and neo-classical styles one can easily see that they are all bound by the same inspiration taken from antiquity. 
-- 10:10, 30 January 2007 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.145.240.33 (talk) 22:14, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specification of certain periods 

message: I would like to suggest a template which shows the art periods. Here is my idea:
:Major art periods
Gothic art 1140–1500 > Renaissance 14th-17th c. > Baroque 1575 bis 1770 > Rococo 1720-1775 > Neoclassicism > classicism 1770-1830 > Romanticism 1790–1840 > Realism  > ...
to make a start. But we have to be careful not to mix up art movement and art periods. I probably mixed them here... Please help. The question is also: Do we limit that on the Western art or not. --77.4.54.173 (talk) 14:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal

message: As a Greek I noticed Greek schools being referred at least four times and I was wondering if we should add more pages about schools of specific countries if there are any that aren't present here. 62.74.10.175 (talk) 12:49, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schools of different European countries.
Talk:Bengeo

message: Is this article a stub?
Is there much more that could be said about Bengeo?
--JimmyTheWig 15:04, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I reckon there is more that could be added - e.g. dates  of construction of The  Avenue development, and on the other side Revels Road etc. along with photos of  the churches  and water  tower...    Famous residents, Biggles links.... C2r 21:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I must say I'm inclined to agree with you on the village point. I have connections to the area and as far as I am aware, the references to Bengeo as a village are an attempt to distinguish it as a different area of Hertford. While I do not live in the area now, I am familiar with the geography and it never seemed to be any different than any other area of Hertford in terms of recognition as a village. I've reworded in a more neutral way, but if someone can come up with a reliable reference that states Bengeo was once considered a village (rather than just the apparent minority with the (unofficial) opinion that currently stands), it can be added back appropriately. As for the other points you raised, I unfortunately do not know enough of the area anymore to know how correct you are. I have, however, removed most of the capitalisation on the words 'upper' and 'lower' when referring to the parts of Bengeo since they don't appear to be official, according to the text in the article. Sky83 (talk) 21:53, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a problem with the references. They go up to 10 in the text but only 5 are listed in the Reflist. I can't work out why this is. Can anyone help? Roundtheworld (talk) 08:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Caused by malformed template syntax in refs introduced by edit in September. Now fixed. Gandalf61 (talk) 09:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:TGZ

message: Shouldn't this redirect to tar (file format) instead, since a gzipped tarball is a tarball first, with gzip applied to it? --Peng 15:05, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, heck, I'm gonna do it. Someone can always change it back (and hopefully say why they did it on this talk page). --Peng 17:10, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Telde

message: I commented out a sentence in the History section about the local government -- it presumed prior knowledg of the area and didn't make sense without it. Check the edit page to see what I mean; if someone knowledgable on the area could correct it, it would be appreciated. Christiant 15:11, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: 123,265 (Infobox) or 102,170 (text) or 100,000 ()? Plantek (talk) 14:02, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population?
Talk:Dez Dam

message: 3,340 cubic metres can't be right. http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0113468.html says 3340 million cubic metres. Sounds about right for the reservoir volume, http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?tocId=9030197 says 495,000 cubic metres. That sounds like the volume of the dam structure, rather than the reservoir.  3,310 million is the initial size from what i see in sources, maybe 3.3 Billion cubic meters (a conversion) sounds better.
Add importance level. Majidvp (talk) 07:32, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, almost 6 years later... Should be clarified now. The capacity is closer to 2.6 billion m3.--NortyNort  (Holla) 20:53, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Calcium signaling

message: These are some of topics needed for expansion:
*Calcium signaling through ion channels
*Calcium signaling through GPCRs
:*Phospholipase C pathway
:*others
*calcium role in exocytosis
:*synaptogamin
*Calcium as a signal for necrosis
*Calciums role at the neuromuscular junction
*Intracellular role of calcium in allosteric regulation
:*protein kinase A activation
:*troponin
:*calmodulin
:*Ca/calmodulin kinase II
:*calcineurin
:*CREB
*role in Long term potentiation
They may not have to be full accounts; a brief explanation with a link to the main article may suffice. I may attempt an expansion in summer if it still needs doing then.
Snellios (talk) 17:56, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion Topics 

message: I came onto this page for a definition of "Calcium Signaling."  Instead, the article begins by using the term "calcium signaling" to define another highly technical term, which is marginally worse than the proverbial "defining a word by using it in its definition."  The article never gets around to actually defining "calcium signaling," at least to the extent I read.  OK, to confess, I gave up at the beginning because the article did not begin with a definition of "calcium signaling," and when it immediately got very technical, I didn't peruse any further to see if the definition might be provided later.  I felt forced to give up. Nei1 (talk) 13:25, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perspective of an Ignorant Reader 

message: Perhaps more examples will demonstrate the importance of Ca2+ signalling.
Gregory Aldrich (talk) 19:16, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: I thought it was really interesting how so many systems change function depending on the calcium concentration.Gd1220061 (talk) 02:57, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting connections 

message: — Assignment last updated by Bubbstar (talk) 20:10, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 378 - Biochemistry Lab - spring 2023
Talk:Cat hoarding

message: This article portrays cat hoarding and cat hoarders in a very negative light. I don't know enough about the subject to rewrite, but I'm certain that it's possible. Dave 23:40, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course it portrays it in a negative light. Cat hoarding in many instances is tantamount to animal abuse, and generally indicative of mental illness; there is a reason the authorities get involved with these cases. You've offered no argument to refute this, which you should have done before you flagged the topic as NPOV. angrywhiteman < This user name does not exist. --WikiCats 11:03, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  pov
Talk:Slipcover

message: Are commercial links appropriate? --Allyn 05:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, as per Wikipedia:Spam: Adding external links to an article or user page for the purpose of promoting a website or a product is not allowed, and is considered to be spam. I am removing the link. RP Bravo 22:22, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is commercial links appropriate
Talk:Super CCD

message: How is the Super CCD an X3 competitor any more than it is a conventional CCD or CMOS competitor? The X3 sensor uses the fact different wavelengths of light reflect at different depths in silicon to capture true RGB colour at every pixel location. The Super CCD is still a Bayer (mosaic) sensor, it simply has a different pixel shape to conventional sensors. This has a few advantages, but true colour image capture is not one of them.
Defsac 16:02, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs to be updated with information from the 2008 PMA show. See here:  68.49.45.29 (talk) 03:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008 PMA show superccd 

message: I have been testing various kinds of 3rd Party software on the Fuji S2 Pro, and discovered quite a quality difference between these. Most converters seem to rely on a common misconception, that the foto sensors are arranged at a 45 degree angle. The resulting images are blurry, and the detail level resembles a 4 mega pixel camera. This goes for Bibble, QImage Pro, dcraw and even Adobe RAW. They all deliver worse quality than in-camera jpeg. The only proper RAW conversion comes from Fuji's own software. I think this should somehow be mentioned in this article. JoaCHIP (talk) 13:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've since stuck in an example translated with DCRaw, which is mentioned above, although it's not used to illustrate the resolution but instead the unusual original format of the RAW files (which might explain why they're so large, too). -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 20:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Octogonal layout confuses 3rd party software 

message: While I'm at it, Fuji seem to be quiet about Super CCD on their website, and the Fuji X100 uses a conventional Sony sensor. Do any current Fuji products use Super CCD sensors? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:24, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Defunct
Talk:Yuri

message: Am I missing something here? (AntiGravityMaster (talk) 21:35, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is George listen in the See also? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Yuritemp. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 10#Yuritemp until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Yuritemp" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Kurt Russell

message: Is that still relevant at this point?
205.189.94.17 (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canada portal 

message: When were the Rangers on Gilligan's Island? And Jungle Boy was an outlaw? Seriously?
Is the reason Russell was hired by Disney was because he was Walt's dying wish? 72.251.27.111 (talk) 20:08, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF? 

message: His discography needs to be included. https://www.discogs.com/artist/857521-Kurt-Russell  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:244:4C7F:8B00:A946:EFF:5766:2F06 (talk) 23:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: Please, do not use unacceptable sentences that are not related to any articles, They will permanently be reverted either adding or removing. You can ask barn star related Wikipedia accountants for permission, before editing any articles or use the semi-protection lock icon with a favor. Add any sentences and references coming from the world of news. Thank you for warning. 142.188.2.222 (talk) 15:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-vandalism article protection 

message: 1964.   The Virginian.  Episode 89.  Uncredited Cameo 2605:59C8:50E2:4400:F502:7E97:1287:A403 (talk) 22:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 13:46, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 August 2023 

message: in the first paragraph, change
where he starred as Dexter Riley in films, such as
to 
where he starred as Dexter Riley in films such as
no need for the comma 38.105.140.5 (talk) 16:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Tollens (talk) 19:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 October 2023
Talk:Taejo of Goryeo

message: The Emperor/King Taejo of Goryeo's posthumous name (시호; 諡號) is Sinseong (Hanja: 神聖, Hangul in Modern Korean: 신성, McCune-Reischauer (M-R, Original): Sinsŏng, Modified M-R (South Korea, 1984): Shinsŏng).
"본관 개성(開城), 자 약천(若天), 성 왕(王), 휘 건(建), 시호 신성(神聖)이다." from 두산세계대백과()Translation: (The Emperor/King Taejo of Goryeo's) Ancestral home (Korean: 본관(本貫)) is Gaeseong, (his) courtesy name is Yakcheon, (his) family name is Wang, (his) given name is Geon, and (his) posthumous name is Sinseong. --yes0song 13:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Posthumous name

message: Have changed the name to "Wang Gun." Oyo321 05:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not an acceptable title, for reasons ranging from romanization to the standardized use of temple names.  Please see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Korean) and Wikipedia:Naming conventions (monarchs).  -- Visviva 06:26, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: move

message: "However, Wang's unification in 936 was a full-scale unification, with the agreement of all Korean people—and the nation remained as single, unified country until 1948, when Korea was divided into North and South." For an encyclopedia this sounds a little emotional and arguable : for a large part of this period Korea was occupied by Japan and the division of Korea occurred de facto in 1945. 86.33.15.82 (talk) 21:25, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  undivided?
Talk:Chart pattern

message: I have written an article on Broadening Top and adding a link in the section Patterns.Altafqadir (talk) 15:33, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Bad idea, NO original research, must be cited to reliable sources.  WurmWoodeT 02:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a link
Talk:Sampler (needlework)

message: I would like some history on the inclusion of gloomy verses on samplers. Was it a case of oppressive teachers crushing childhood optimism, or was it a long-running joke that both the children and their instructors were in on?Cheesusfreak (talk) 10:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gloomy verses
Talk:Russell Baze

message: Russell Baze 
Is one of the most talented jockeys in the history of horse racing. His work ethic is unbeatable and his talent unstoppable.
The statements in the article about Baze being the "leading jockey" in the United States need to be clarified.  He might be leading jockey by wins, but he is not leading jockey by earnings.  In fact on the front page of equibase.com (the official statistics source for U.S. thoroughbred racing), there is a listing entitled "North American Racing Leaders" for horses/jockeys/owners/trainers for 2006, and they are ranked by EARNINGS, not wins. (Baze is 24th as of Nov 17, 2006).  So this needs to be clarified in the article.  18:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification

message: Shouldn´t it be just Major Racing Wins & Honours ??
The awards are listed separately below that. KoopaTroopa (talk) 17:08, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Racing Wins & Honours & Awards
Talk:Beulah Annan

message: Found and photographed her tombstone yesterday. It reads
Top panel: 
BEULAH M. 
Front:
DAU. OF
J.R. & M. 
SHERIFF
NOV. 18 1898
MAR. 10, 1927
Epitaph:
Gone but not forgotten.
--Sporkofscience 22:09, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Dates?

message: why call her a murderess? I think she was finally acquitted.
I agree with the above statement - While it is evident that it was she who killed the man, it never came clear if it was an actual murder, or a self-defence kill. I say, change "murderess" into "killer". --Akuen 18:02, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Murder Controversy

message: No sources, add unref tag. POV, calls her a murderer though she was not convicted.--FloNight 23:21, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't take it out on Kander and Ebb; they wrote the musical long after she was acquitted (and had died).  And as it turned out, even the musical was ahead of its time; it wasn't till after O.J. Simpson's trial in the 1990's that it took off as the long-running revival (and later Oscar-winning film).  --RBBrittain 03:51, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs sources

message: The first and second paragraphs under "Early life" are conflicting.  The first says she moved to Chicago right after divorcing Perry Stephens; the second says she didn't move there till after she married Al Annan in Kentucky.  Since there aren't any web links to the Chicago Tribune articles cited, I can't for myself which is correct.  Which one is it?  Or are both correct (i.e., she married Annan immediately after divorcing Stephens--which suggests Annan wasn't her first cuckold)?  --RBBrittain 03:51, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict between paragraphs
Talk:Dog poop girl

message: This article was unsuccessfully nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Dog poop girl for a record.  Postdlf 07:10, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to all who voted to keep! Breakall 14:02, 2005 July 20 (UTC)
I don't understand this edit notation: (deprod, survived AfD around this time last year, should be discussed again.) How do I go about starting this type of discussion? Vagabond997 12:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD 

message: Being bold is great, but merging an article into oblivion without any discussion seems to cross a line.  —Gaff ταλκ 20:53, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Especially given that this merge has been reverted several times by different users (including myself), and is therefore clearly contested. PC78 22:44, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging without discusion? 

message: I quote from the article: 
"In early June 2005, the woman, who appears to be in her 20's took her lap dog on a subway in Korea. Her dog defecated on the floor of the subway car and, when asked by other elderly riders, she rudely declined to clean up after it. Another subway rider offered the woman a tissue, which she used to clean the dog but not its waste. When other passengers suggested she clean up the mess, she ignored the requests and departed the subway at the next stop."
So were there two rounds of requesting? Or is it just that the article's poorly written? Unidentified Flying Bunny in the Sky Talk Contribs 01:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repetition? 

message: I propose that the lead read something like this to focus the article on the incident not the person : -
: "Dog poop girl" was an incident on a South Korean subway that was recorded and published, resulting in a backlash by Internet vigilantes.
--neonwhite  user page talk 16:25, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focusing the article 

message: Really? Popular? Sez who? In comparison to other "poop websites", or overall? Cause I'm not buying it. 22:51, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Popular Poop Website"
Talk:Huron–Clinton Metroparks

message: This is a great article, but do each of them really need their own articles? I think all the unique encyclopedic information about each could be written in about one paragraph in this page. - Taxman Talk 16:47, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
:Combined article should remain; however, these parks and the metroparks authority are important topics so it could expand. Descriptions should begin in the combined article. It might be able to be one article. Let's wait and see.Thomas Paine1776 15:13, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled
Talk:Jungian psychology

message: Why you remove the merge tag? Analytical psychology and Jungian psychology are synonyms. --pippo2001 23:00, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: moved to article page Paul foord 21:09, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Analytical psychology]]

message: The section's last paragraph seems garbled.  Or maybe I don't have the psychology background? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cdamama (talk • contribs) 06:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medical basis for schizophrenia 

message: I put this tag on for several reasons:
1. Every other thinker (psychoanalysts in particular) have one page for their bio AND a summary of their theory.
2. There is already a basic description of his theory on his page.
3. Every concept on here that needs more explanation than it does or would on the bio page already has its own page.  
Discuss.Acornwithwings 19:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment go to discussion at Talk:Carl Jung Paul foord 22:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Carl Jung]]

message: it seems like there was support for this idea as opposed to the previous merge idea (see Carl Jung talk page), and it's probably more appropriate, so i thought i'd see where the discussion went.  i also posted this on the Analytical psychology talk page.  Acornwithwings 01:28, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge w/[[Analytical psychology]]
Talk:Triple junction

message: In petrography, triple junctions are a part of a suite of textures collectively called "granoblastic texture" resulting from metamorphic recrystallization of a rock.  Three grains will often meet at a triple junction, with three 120 degree angles defining the intersection.  This is also called "foam texture".  Perhaps this should be included, along with a link to the "granoblastic" page.
-A university instructor of 3rd and 4th year geology.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.206.125.33 (talk) 20:46, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 24.50.151.151 (talk) 12:13, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  add from wiki mid ocean ridge