lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1987 World Snooker Championship

message: at Preston Guild Hall on 26th March – 4th April:
1st qualifying round: Jim Bear beat Jack Rea 10-5; T Kearney wo F Jonik; S James beat M Watterson 10-2; G Jenkins beat R Grace 10-9; D Greaves beat P Thornley 10-6; M Darrington beat B Demarco 10-6; J Rempe beat Martin Smith 10-9; G Rigitano beat P Morgan 10-4; C Roscoe beat T Whitthread 10-2; M Morra beat P Gibson 10-6; D Chalmers wo E McLaughlin; M Bennett beat J Hargreaves 10-6; B Kelly beat B Bennett 10-0; J Meadowcroft beat D Mienie 10-3; G Foulds beat P Watchorn 10-6; Dennis Hughes beat M Parkin 10-5; B Oliver beat P Burke 10-5; J Dunning beat J Caggianello 10-7; J Wright beat P Houlihan 10-4; B Rowswell wo S Simngam; N Gilbert beat D Sheehan 10-6; J Fitzmaurice beat C Everton 10-2; D Roe wo O Agrawal; K Owers beat M Fisher 10-5
2nd qualifying round: M Gauvreau beat Jim Bear 10-3; P Medati beat T Kearney 10-8; E Sinclair beat T Drago 10-9; R Edmonds beat S James 10-1; Tommy Murphy beat G Jenkins 10-4; G Miles beat D Greaves 10-7; S Hendry beat M Darrington 10-7; J Rempe beat John Rea 10-9; G Rigitano beat V Harris 10-6; S Newbury beat L Dodd 10-7; S Duggan beat C Roscoe 10-7; T Chappel beat M Morra 10-8; T Jones beat D Chalmers 10-1; J Van Rensburg beat J McLaughlin 10-6; M Bennett beat B Mikkelsen 10-4; W Jones beat J Donnelly 10-3; I Black beat I Williamson 10-8; D O’Kane beat D Gilbert 10-2; M Gibson beat B Kelly 10-9; G Cripsey beat J Meadowcroft 10-9; D Fowler beat G Foulds 10-6; B Harris beat Dennis Hughes 10-2; B Oliver beat P Fagan 10-2; G Scott beat J Dunning 10-7; M Wildman beat R Foldvari 10-5; J Wright beat P Browne 10-6; M Bradley beat B Rowswell 10-6; J O’Boye beat N Gilbert 10-5; J Spencer beat R Bales 10-3; R Chaperon beat J Fitzmaurice 10-2; W King beat D Roe 10-4; K Owers beat F Davis 10-5
3rd qualifying round: P Medati beat M Gauvreau 10-3; R Edmonds beat E Sinclair 10-6; Tommy Murphy beat G Miles 10-7; S Hendry beat J Rempe 10-4; S Newbury beat G Rigitano 10-4; T Chappel beat S Duggan 10-3; T Jones beat J Van Rensburg 10-0; M Bennett beat W Jones 10-3; D O’Kane beat I Black 10-2; G Cripsey beat M Gibson 10-4; D Fowler beat B Harris 10-5; B Oliver beat G Scott 10-5; J Wright beat M Wildman 10-0; M Bradley beat J O’Boye 10-7; J Spencer beat R Chaperon 10-4; W King beat K Owers 10-4
Final qualifying round: E Hughes beat P Medati 10-2; M Macleod beat R Edmonds 10-7; S Longworth beat Tommy Murphy 10-2; S Hendry beat D Martin 10-7; M Hallett beat S Newbury 10-4; J Campbell beat T Chappel 10-6; J Virgo beat T Jones 10-9; M Bennett beat B Werbeniuk 10-8; D O’Kane beat P Francisco 10-5; David Taylor beat G Cripsey 10-7; J Parrott beat D Fowler 10-3; D Reynolds beat B Oliver 10-7; J Wright beat C Wilson 10-4; J Wych beat M Bradley 10-7; B West beat J Spencer 10-5; W King beat E Charlton 10-4
188.29.8.15 (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Qualifying for the 1987 Embassy World Snooker Championship
Talk:Rebbachisaurus

message: In the photograph, the skeleton associated with Giganotosaurus represents the Argentinian species Rebbachisaurus tessonei which is now known as Limaysaurus tessonei. I would suggest to move the picture to the relevant article. ArthurWeasley (talk) 05:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: I've removed a claim that Rebbachisaurus has been found in Europe as well as Africa, assuming that is a misunderstanding because I cannot find any sources for this information except for Wiki clones. Would think it would be pretty noteworthy finding an African dinosaur genus in Europe. To my knowledge this genus has never been found in Europe (only other members of the family have been). Would be neat if it's true but it should have a reference if it is going to be re-added. 2601:342:100:9000:E59B:7B9B:A8A1:B414 (talk) 14:59, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rebbachisaurus in Europe
Talk:Regnosaurus

message: "Regnosaurus (meaning "Sussex lizard")" -- "Regn" = "Sussex"? Can anyone explain how this works? -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 19:41, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The tribe of the Regni inhabited Sussex.--MWAK (talk) 12:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of name
Talk:1981 World Snooker Championship

message: The book "The Hamlyn Encyclopedia of Snooker" has much more detail than this on the event, e.g. Jimmy Whit'es qualifying round winds, and indeed all of the qualifying rounds, would the info get deleted if it was included as not coming from an internet source?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.203.254.2 (talk) 18:42, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the source doesn't have to be online. If you use a book, than you should add the page numbers too. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 20:01, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 
Talk:1980 World Snooker Championship

message: Jack Rea beat B Bennett 9-1; W Thorne beat K Robitaille 9-4; W Thorne beat Jack Rea 9-1
S Davis beat C Ross 9-3; P Morgan beat P Thornley 9-4; S Davis beat P Morgan 9-0
M Hallett beat K Kennerley 9-2; K Stevens beat D Greaves 9-3; K Stevens beat M Hallett 9-3
J Johnson beat R Andrewartha 9-5; P Houlihan beat J Johnson 9-6; T Meo beat J Van Rensburg 9-1; T Meo beat P Houlihan 9-1
R Amdor beat B Mikkelsen 9-7; R Williams beat R Amdor 9-4; J Wych beat John Bear 9-5; J Wych beat R Williams 9-7
F Jonik beat M Wildman 9-7; C Wilson beat F Jonik 9-6
R Edmonds beat M Parkin 9-2; S Hood beat J Dunning 9-7; R Edmonds beat S Hood 9-6
E Sinclair beat M Morra 9-5; E Sinclair beat D Mienie 9-7; J Meadowcroft beat E Sinclair 9-1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.29.8.15 (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Qualifying for the 1980 World Snooker Championship
Talk:1979 World Snooker Championship

message: state express w0rld challenge cup 1979 warley west midlands 20/101979  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.30.71.47 (talk) 10:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Rhoetosaurus

message: I've made a small edit to indicate that Rhoetosaurus is also known as Rhaetosaurus and Rheteosaurus.--Gazzster 04:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks fine, although I deleted two wikilinks; they only redirected back to this article, making the link a bit redundant. Keep up the good work, though! :)--Firsfron of Ronchester 05:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:1977 World Snooker Championship

message: http://livescores.worldsnookerdata.com/PastTournaments.aspx?p=1&t=368 differs somewhat from the scores given here: it has John Dunning (not John Virgo) beating Roy Andrewartha 11-1, has David Taylor 11-0 David Greaves but omits John Pulman 11–0 David Taylor (presumably David Taylor is an error here anyway, since he qualified). Nigej 16:36, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The link you have given shows the results of the 2010 World Championship. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 16:45, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry. Scroll down to the 1977 Championship for the above results. Nigej 17:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I did find them, but if I can't source them, then I can't add them. Armbrust Talk to me Contribs 17:26, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Armbrust The Homunculus 18:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Qualification matches
Talk:Ben Mink

message: Ben Mink spent 6 years in FM, and this article gives them one line in a list of bands from his "early career." Huh? JoeJJC (talk) 21:06, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Time in FM?
Talk:McDonogh Day Boycott

message: I put together this stub based on a few on-line sources, none of them really precise or comprehensive.  None of the sources gave the exact date.  I inserted 7 May because the Times-Picayune article cited in the article indicated that it occurred ten days before the Brown v. Board of Education ruling, which was on 17 May.  That oughta be verified.  Also, one of the sources said the boycott continued for another two years.  What happened after that?  Was the ceremony ever integrated? -- Muffuletta 03:16, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Need more details
Talk:Saltopus

message: what did the saltopus eat  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.168.167.130 (talk) 11:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not known - the head has never been found, so we can't say anything about its jaws or teeth. Dinoguy2 (talk) 12:37, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Diet

message: — Assignment last updated by UnwoundRiver (talk) 21:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Animal Physiology
Talk:Sanpasaurus

message: I've read that Upchurch (1995) considers Sanpasaurus a basal sauropod (see also thesis by Philip Mannion). Would it make sense to admit that Sanpasaurus is a valid basal sauropod and not a chimera rather than wait for better material from the Sanpasaurus type horizon?
Upchurch, P. 1995. The evolutionary history of sauropod dinosaurs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, B, 349:365-390.68.4.61.168 (talk) 02:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanpasaurus
Talk:Sarcosaurus

message: This should be added to the top of the article. They are very similar names and could be easily misread.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.130.109 (talk) 05:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. I went with the "for the..." template, but the "distinguish" template would work, too. J. Spencer (talk) 01:04, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Not to be confused with [[Sarcosuchus]]
Talk:Sauropelta

message: If we're working up to GA etc...
:Scientifically, Sauropelta is one of the best-known nodosaurids...
"Scientifically" possibly redundant here? Although as I write this I am reminded of pop culture. In which case maybe substitute "understood" for known.....cheers,  Cas Liber | talk  |  contribs 04:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good, I'll change it. Sheep81 04:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Cool, I won't worry then. Sheep81 05:05, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree that it is probably GA material: it's only slightly shorter than our shortest FA, Albertosaurus, so it seems comprehensive. I can't find any serious issues that would bar it from GA status. Firsfron of Ronchester 06:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musings... 

message: Is there evidence that Deinonychus preyed on/fed on Sauropelta? This is stated as a fact in the article, and if there's no direct or association evidence it should probably be changed to something like "fed on Tenontosaurus and may have fed on Sauropelta as well." Dinoguy2 10:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed to "fed on some of these herbivores". Nice and vague. :) Sheep81 10:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Deinonychus'' 

message: I've come across this article, still a bit in  the start state, to which Anky-man contributes. Seems some of the generic, backstory prose you have in Environment could migrate there, where it could support a number of articles, and then here the dicussion can become pretty focussed on Sauropelta, No? Keep up the good work! Check in early next week. Gosgood 17:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good idea. I think I've removed a lot of the backstory and just left in the details that directly relate to Sauropelta: the age, the environment of the time, how the Cloverly times (and Sauropelta) ended, and the other fauna of the time, which would have interacted with Sauropelta. I left in the information at the end about faunal transition because I think it puts Sauropelta and the rest of the fauna in context. Plus it is interesting, I think. I'll see about transferring some of the deleted prose to Cloverly Formation. Anyway there may be a few more changes on the way but so far I think we are making good progress. Thanks a lot for your work on this! Sheep81 20:11, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Cloverly Formation]]: merge/cross link opportunity? 

message: I suspect that the skull discussed in several SVP abstracts by Parsons & Parsons as possibly Sauropelta was later described as Tatankacephalus. The general location (Middle Dome region of Wheatland Co, MT), stratigraphy (Cloverly VII), and material sync up. J. Spencer (talk) 23:05, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parsons & Parsons
Talk:Saurornitholestes

message: Honestly.  The picture is just silly.  It wasn't accurate, and it had to go.
````—Preceding unsigned comment added by Twaletta (talk • contribs) 
:I'm not sure what you mean. Which part do you think is inaccurate? Firsfron of Ronchester 08:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm guessing the part that looks like a bird rather than a lizard ::) I drew this a few years ago but, correct me if I'm wrong, it's anatomically correct and the feathers reflect known dromaeosaurid structure and pattern. Dinoguy2 19:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Pronated hands? Editor abcdef (talk) 11:35, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The drawing in question is not there anymore. But yeah, the skeleton in the taxobox has pronated hands... FunkMonk (talk) 14:39, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: some teeth referred to as S. cf. langstoni have been found in the Prince Creek Formation, yet there's no information about them on the page. Crylophosaurus (talk) 15:42, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  should it have more information on the remains uncovered in Alaska?
Talk:John J. Kelly

message: Why two medals for the same action? Was that ever done before, or since? More info needed. 213.122.126.167 (talk) 14:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Two?

message: Why two MoH for the same action? Seems unique. More info needed. 213.122.126.167 (talk) 14:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two?
Talk:Super Mario's Wacky Worlds

message: I'm proposing to move this and a few other games from :Category:Mario platform games.  Please see discussion there. --Heywood 18:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recategorization proposal 

message: Wouldn't it be better to use an actual gameplay screenshot rather than what appears to be a beta level selection screen? Jeff Silvers 21:16, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Possible source: http://games.slashdot.org/story/03/05/11/2124208/super-marios-wacky-worlds Salvidrim! 03:59, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't seem to be any content in that reference, other than a broken link to another article. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 02:44, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Damn, I hate finding two very promising sources only to discover them dead and lost. Salvidrim! 03:27, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: How do we know that that "preliminary cover art" isn't just a fan-made collage? It's from some amateur Google Site that doesn't even claim it's official. Raymond1922 (talk) 03:03, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a screenshot of the first level. Now, how do I nominate the cover art for deletion? Raymond1922 (talk) 03:20, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover art
Talk:Frisch School

message: The Frisch School's original campus was such an integral part of the yeshiva's history that it is a little underrepresented in this article. Try to incorporate more of the history of the old campus in the article to provide readers a greater understanding of the current school's history. Sources such as newspaper articles of the school breaking ground in paramus, or the renaming of the street to Frisch Court would be applicable.
Zgoldst3 (talk) 15:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campus 

message: Dear User:Techrav,
Please talk with me here about the mission statement - my view is that per WP:MISSION, this doesn't qualify as helpful to the talk page.
Thanks,
OfficerCow (talk) 23:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mission Statement 

message: under Notable alumni ..
* Tali Farhadian (born 1974 or 1975), former US federal prosecutor
--2603:7000:2143:8500:591E:7327:B8C1:65DC (talk) 22:19, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 22:33, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Student officers are not listed in school articles. As for the election timing, that's routine for schools, so it doesn't warrant a mention either. —C.Fred (talk) 01:46, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add
Talk:Mao Kobayashi (model)

message: Mao Kobayashi did NOT play "Izumi Toyama" in Ju-on: The Grudge; that actress was Misa Uehara (born 1983), per IMDB: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0364385 -- Ben TALK/HIST 02:02, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film section removed 

message: There's two different Mao Kobayashis, one is a 15 year old gravure model, the one in this article and another is a 24 year old actress.  Haha, I'll fix this up when I get the chance. Jonmwang 21:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 different Mao Kobayashis 
Talk:Big Fat Liar

message: when wolf was in the messed up car what was the song playing  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greenday21 (talk • contribs) 13:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song 

message: From the article - "He delivers a striking blow to Marty's family jewels."
Is this really encyclopedic?202.124.89.2 (talk) 09:00, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate 
Talk:Index of modern Egypt–related articles

message: It seems like the List of Egypt-related topics should be broken into subsets.  This Second article: " List of Modern Egypt-related topics ", might suffice for now, until someone suggests other ideas.
:Ancient Egypt
:Egypt( Historical Egypt )
:Modern Egypt
(I am not personally aware of some of the articles that should be on this page.)Mmcannis 03:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First attempt to create 2 articles
Talk:TAM Air

message: Upon first encountering this article, it had been marked with a cleanup template. The article may be a particularly short stub, but that does not been it is of poor quality. However, this article could use much more expansion. Anyone who knows about this airline, please contribute. Thanks! — † Webdinger BLAH | SZ 04:02, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: The statement "specialising in aerospace" in the first line of the article is ambiguous and confusing. Perhaps "aerospace technology" would be better.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.217.79.191 (talk) 00:35, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous statement.
Talk:History of Ireland (1691–1800)

message: I have opened a discussion on a reorganisation of the series of articles dealing with Irish history at Talk:History of Ireland#RFC: Irish history series. --RA (talk) 23:09, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  RFC: Irish history series 

message: There was a [citation needed] tag on one statement. An IP added a citation without being aware of the proper format and was simply reverted, twice, once with a fairly uncivil edit summary. It's worth noting that even if the IP had known to use <ref> it would have done no good since, as the editor above pointed out, there was no reference section. As to providing a page number, the fact that a standard history of Ireland named the volume on the eighteenth century 'The Long Peace' is an ample citation for the fact that "it has been called 'the long peace'" - no page number required. This kind of knee-jerk revert does nothing to improve any article. Nobody should have to point out WP:DONTBITE to experienced editors.  Scolaire (talk) 08:44, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The IP that added the cite was reverted once, and not by me. The other IP which I reverted is quite clearly not a good faith editor but a disruptive stalker reverting RashersTierney's edits, as this and this demonstrate. O Fenian (talk) 12:35, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops! Didn't see that. Apologies.  Scolaire (talk) 13:40, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: Does anybody know when Ireland adopted the change of start of year and change of calendar? I.E., was there an Act equivalent to England's Calendar (New Style) Act 1750? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 20:55, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: AFAIK it was 'officially' adopted with the enactment of the English act and no separate Irish act was considered necessary. Here is an interesting essay on the contemporary politics of the Julian/Gregorian calendars wrt Ireland. RashersTierney (talk) 23:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Doh! p9 of above source states "Grattan's Parliament of 1782 felt the need to formally enact the legislation again because this was a case of the Westminster parliament exercising its alleged superiority over its Irish counterpart." RashersTierney (talk) 23:45, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Style and New Style dating 

message: Someone appears to think that there was such a thing as a single 'Act of Union 1801'. There wasn't, there were two, and they were both passed in 1800 and thus are referred to as the Acts of Union 1800. Although their provisions _came into force_ on 1 January 1 1801, this era of Irish history definitely and incontrovertibly came to an end on 31 December 1800, and thus I propose that this article's name should be changed to History of Ireland (1691–1800). See Talk:Acts of Union 1800#1800? for further explanation. >MinorProphet (talk) 01:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed name change
Talk:George Grenville

message: George Greenville is a requested article...I think it's probably someone who wanted an article on this fellow.  Should Greenville redirect here, or is that too distinct a spelling to make a redirect? Jwrosenzweig 04:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never seen Grenville's name spelled that way.  English spelling was fairly standardized in the 18th century.  I see no especial reason for a redirect. john k 07:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What are the general guidelines for redirects for misspellings?  I had thought that we don't have redirects for misspellings, but we obviously have some (Tony Bliar, for instance)...it seems like this is something we ought to have a general policy for, and not decide based on individual cases. john k 23:32, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The guidelines, such as they are, are here: Wikipedia:Redirect.  It's not good at distinguishing when we make such decisions.  Do you think this is such a case? Jwrosenzweig 23:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've no idea.  If you want to make the redirect, feel free.  The alternate spelling seems common, even if wrong. john k 02:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Non-peers who are on the Privy Council do not affix the suffix "PC" after their names. The proper way to indicate that he was on the Privy Council is the prefix "The Right Honourable," which, as I understand it, is forbidden by current wikipedia conventions on strange egalitarian grounds. If we're not going to use "Right Honourable," we shouldn't use a made up suffix, either.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.252.201 (talk) 15:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "PC" 
Talk:Admiralty House, Sydney

message: This is inconsistent with other sources including NSW Govt records.
Secretary Index, 1788-1825
The exact circumstances of Muir's ownership not known, Lightfoot and Ryan are mentioned in colonial records. I have edited the article to correct a couple of errors with respect to how much land Muir owned (he did not own all Kirribilli) and also Ryan's period of ownership (he did own all Kirribilli) etc.
I also added the reference to the Surry incident, but not sure how directly it relates to Admiralty House, so will not feel at all offended if someone wants to remove it later.
I have also recently created a page on the original owner, Colonel Gibbes and added WP links to take a user to the page. Greatly surprised that the page on Gibbes had not previously been written. That has eliminated some red links from this page. AWHS (talk) 09:52, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muir 

message: The edit summary merely says "Consistancy" [sic].  Consistency with what?  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 07:31, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: Does the chief of the navy have an official residence nowadays? 122.59.249.222 (talk) 06:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  RAN admirals 
Talk:David, Chiriquí

message: I'm editing the section that talks about hotels. It provides links to hotels web sites and reads more like a travel brochure than an encyclopedia article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.66.52 (talk) 08:39, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hotels