lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hartogs number

message: The proof given appears to be invalid or at least so unclear as to be unconvincing. JRSpriggs 06:14, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm working on it.  You could have tagged it with ....  — Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 18:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Can we assume that, in ZF, if X is a set, then X × X is a set.  The proof I'm familiar with in is NBG, where that's one of the finite set of axioms encompassing comprehension.  — Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 19:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Kripke–Platek set theory#Proof that Cartesian products exist for a proof that Cartesian products exist. Or use the axiom of powerset#Consequences and the axiom schema of specification. JRSpriggs 22:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

text: And thanks for reworking the proof, it is much clearer now. JRSpriggs 22:27, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalid (or at least unclear) "Proof" 

message: Re the late exchange between User:JRSpriggs and User:Cherkash:  I decided to go looking on Google Scholar to see how the terminology is actually used.  I agree with Cherkash that the general style on WP is to keep the final s.  On the other hand, if the term Hartogs' function without the s is the common usage, then we should use it.  Or, if attested, we might be able to cut the Gordian knot by writing Hartogs function, using Hartogs as a noun adjunct rather than a possessive.
As it turns out, though, I was not able to verify (with any of the search terms) that this terminology is used for this at all.  It seems to be used instead for some quite different notion.  To quote this paper, "[a]n upper semi-continuous function h in a Stein space X is called a Hartogs function in X if the Hartogs domain \{(z,x)\in C\times X; |z|<e^{-h(x)}\} is Runge–Stein in C×X."  I don't know what all of that means, exactly, but it does not appear to be about ordinal numbers.
So maybe we should just remove the contested text altogether? --Trovatore (talk) 06:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Going by the grammar argument alone, I agree with the dichotomy presented: we are effectively left to decide whether to use the noun adjunct form (aka noun's attributive form), or a possessive (with " 's " added). Either one is a grammatically acceptable way to use here, with the choice towards one or the other usually guided by tradition and commonality of use. In the first case, the spelling is "Hartogs function", in the second it's "Hartogs's function". As for the actual subject, if there's any doubt about the statement presented, then please by all means go ahead and either tag it with the "citation needed" tag (pending reliable sources) – or just go ahead and remove it altogether. cherkash (talk) 06:50, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, if it appears standardly in the literature as Hartogs' function, then that's what we should say; I don't care what the general WP standard is in that case.  However I don't see any evidence so far that that's actually the case. --Trovatore (talk) 06:54, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hartogs['][s] function
Talk:Karenia brevis

message: Karenia brevis has harmful effects on the Florida manatee, which is already an endangered species. Exposure can be lethal, or can lead to long-term impacts. Through times of more extreme red tide events, more than 10% of manatees don't survive. Back in 2013 during an intense bloom, 300 manatees were lost. Although many manage to survive, they are left with harmful effects, specifically targeting the immune system.
When Karenia brevis is found in high concentrations, it is more likely to be harmful because there is a higher concentration of brevotoxins. These sea cows become affected by these toxins through inhaling them or ingesting the algae. Manatees that have been exposed to the harmful algal bloom have experienced declined lymphocyte proliferation, which is related to adaptive immune function. They have also suffered oxidative stress, leading to tissue damage and inflammation. In addition to that, there is evidence of gastrointestinal and neurological issues.
This is a growing issue for many reasons, including the health of the Florida manatee. The year 2003 saw some intense blooms, contributing to 26% of manatee deaths. In 2018, that number shot up to 35%. The state of Florida has implemented some legislation to help manatees, including the Endangered Species Act and the Marine Mammals Protection Act. Manatees also benefit from the Clean Water Act and the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Act, which deal with water quality. However, these protections do not help so much with HABs. Manatee mortality is continuing to increase due to these factors. TheReallyReal (talk) 20:14, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effect of Karenia brevis on the Florida manatee 

message: — Assignment last updated by Friedman.h (talk) 16:58, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENGW3307 Adv Writing for the Sciences 11520
Talk:Sattareh Farmanfarmaian

message: I've read her book and also gave it to friends. Very interesting! Gerhard Schmidt from Berlin --92.206.97.89 (talk) 15:28, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have also read her book - anybody who wants to understand the ME and Iran needs to read it. I am also from Berlin, but now in Australia, Ally Hauptmann-Gurski 58.174.193.2 (talk) 04:31, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi
I read her book.and I wanted to cry...
I.m frome iran but I didn.t know very things.She teach me as a good teacher but...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.185.136.254 (talk) 11:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The girl from iran 

message: Many years an editor moved Sattareh Farman Farmaian to Sattareh Farmanfarmaian.  I ran across her Daughter of Persia book today and was puzzled as to why the article is at Farmanfarmaian.  The author is credited as "Sattareh Farman Farmaian" in the book.  The Cataloging in Publication data on the copyright page uses "Farman-Farmaian, Sattareh". It appears that "Farman Farmaian" and "Farman-Farmaian" are far more common than "Farmanfarmaian".  For example, iran-times.com uses "Farman-Farmaian". I'm thinking of moving the article back to Sattareh Farman Farmaian and am seeing if there's consensus for that. --Marc Kupper|talk 06:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move to Sattareh Farman Farmaian
Talk:Caleçon

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 02:04, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-03-30 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: So… ‘calecon’ without an accent mark is briefs but with one, it means boxer shorts (?) Blu Moon (talk) 20:37, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boxers or Briefs
Talk:Saul Levmore

message: The article states that Levmore joined the faculty in 1998, but turned down the Deanship in 1994.  Is this a misprint?  Did he join the faculty in 1988, rather than '98? Chrysanthememe (talk) 19:12, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article, while ostensibly a biography, begins with its subject's college (other than his birth year).  There is nothing about his parents, birthplace, siblings, early formative influences, etc.  You KNOW that information is out there; was someone simply too lazy? Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have begun an early life section, but it needs work. Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 17:33, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life?
Talk:Saul Malatrasi

message: (...) thus becoming the first player to participate in the European Cup campaigns of two different winning teams.
The real record is that to this day he is the only player in the history of European football to have won the European Cup with two different clubs from the same country. Didi 69 (talk) 12:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  European Cup
Talk:Base 26

message: B/D = 2÷4 < 1. If A=1, how can B/D=A.IR...?? ...it should equal 0.M, or Z.5
70.126.175.4 02:11, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: because A=0 . 66.0.13.61 (talk) 15:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: On the 20th of may some anonymous editor was kind enough to remove some duplications in the text.  It appears these corrections were immediately undone by User:Maxim.  Does he like triplicate text? 66.0.13.61 (talk) 15:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  triplicate 

message: Should this be moved to Base 26, or is this faux Latin actually an English word? kwami 04:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: hexavigesimal is listed (along with a great many others) at http://www.answers.com/topic/numeral-system?cat=technology .  I first encountered the term in a VOD software interface specification. 66.0.13.61 (talk) 15:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Reviving this thread, yes; this Hexavigesimal should be moved to Base 26.GuyHimGuy (talk) 04:09, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Some would object to "hexavigesimal" as a mixed Greek-Latin form, but I'm not sure "Base 26" is superior... AnonMoos (talk) 08:02, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: I suggest the notability issues raised by sligocki are discussed here: Category talk:Positional numeral systems#Notability.--Noe (talk) 17:08, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: in excel AAA is 676+26.  The java code on the page skips columns YA-YZ?  The maximum number of excel columns is 16384, which should be represented as XFD  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.254.222.177 (talk) 13:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the redundant and wrong parts of the section and replaced the algorithm.
SaschaSchwarz01 (talk) 11:35, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  the java code example does not generate the same column names as are used in excel
Talk:Saulo Ribeiro

message: Currently there is a link to an image of him in the middle of the article from a different website. Can we get a real image for Wikipedia, perhaps?
Razionale (talk) 17:59, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A few years late, but I'm trying to accomplish this now. Buddy23Lee (talk) 00:38, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Hierarchical Bayes model

message: I changed "be improper and not normalizable" to "be improper (not normalizable)" because it's synonymous. Any concerns?--Dangauthier 13:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  improper = not normalizable 

message: In the current version, it seems that the model described by the plate picture doesn't correspond to anything in the text, and doesn't illustrate the example. Reason : in the example, there is as many v_i as x_i (n), so there should be only one plate in the graph. What is N ? Question : isn't it a bit confusing for the reader ? Do you plan to add a more complex example? Or am I wrong ?--Dangauthier 13:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustrating picture 

message: I would suggest changing the following sentence in the text. 
"It is a powerful tool for expressing rich statistical models that more fully reflect a given problem than a simpler model could."
As a non-statistician I simply don't understand what is being expressed with this sentence i.e. what does "fully reflect a given problem" mean? Why is it a powerful tool? etc. It seems to me that where a "simple" model describes the data optimally, there is no need to employ a different kind of model to describe it. In many ways Occam's razor would suggest that the law of parsimony should apply.Jimjamjak (talk) 12:19, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Tried to fix this a bit, still not great.  Simpler models are indeed better unless they do not, in fact, represent the situation very well.  Essentially Hierarchical Bayes lets the modeler more directly express dependencies between the parts of the situation being modeled. —johndburger 02:38, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rich" models
Talk:Scarlett Thomas

message: User:Arielmanto72 has contributions of adding excessive unnecessary photos to the article. Thisvis is their only Wiki contribution. This isn't Facebook, so I have removed them. 46.50.91.130 (talk) 00:44, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many photos 
Talk:Hilbert–Schmidt operator

message: The definition of Hilbert--Schmidt functional here is wrong.  In particular, it fails to include the condition on page 126 of Kadison--Ringrose that the sum (3) there converges.  Despite being a bit buried in this subsection of this article, it's quite an important point: as a consequence, the current definition of the tensor product of Hilbert spaces (in the section on universal property of the article `Tensor product of Hilbert spaces') is incorrect.  (The notion of Hilbert--Schmidt functional written here leads to the projective, not the Hilbert, tensor product.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.14.65.43 (talk) 21:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Functionals

message: Is separability really required for an operator to be Hilbert-Schmidt? I understood from other pages that square integrability is sufficient, eg, the remark "regardless of separability" at the end of Mercer's theorem Biker333 (talk) 13:59, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Seperability

message: The article says currently: "The Hilbert–Schmidt operators are closed in the norm topology if, and only if, H is finite dimensional". Surely every Hilbert-Schmidt operator is closed since it is bounded. Should it be "The set of Hilbert–Schmidt operators is closed in the norm topology if, and only if, H is finite dimensional."? Jaan Vajakas (talk) 19:05, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Mct mht (talk) 03:17, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Now I improved the sentence in the article. Jaan Vajakas (talk) 15:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Great. The closure of the Hilbert-Schimidt operators are the compact operators. :) Mct mht (talk) 23:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Hilbert–Schmidt operators are closed in the norm topology if, and only if, H is finite dimensional. 

message: In Hilbert–Schmidt operator: Note that the index set need not be countable.
In trace class : Mimicking the definition for matrices, a bounded linear operator A over a separable Hilbert space H is said to be in the trace class if...
Does the Hilbert space have to be separable, or not, in the Hilbert–Schmidt operator article ?
Or in the trace class article : can separability be dropped, yet the trace Tr(A) still defined, if A is nonnegative self-adjoint? 
If so, a remark should be added to trace class to this effect. That would allow a reader to use the trace class article as the definition of Tr in the Hilbert-Schmidt operator article, for a fully general Hilbert space.
178.38.85.195 (talk) 18:33, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separable or not?
Talk:Hilbert manifold

message: I don't think we can give an inner product structure to an arbitrary Hilbert manifold structure naturally. For the inner product structure, we need a compatibility between all the coordinate charts, just like in the case of a Riemannian manifold, we need some compatibilities between the charts to get a Riemannian structure. Vipul 17:37, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Chip on shoulder

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 02:08, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-03-30 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: I could be completely wrong but the idea of taxpayers as used here, "By 1756, this privilege had been abused and was costing taxpayers too much" seems anachronistic. In 1756 I doubt they would have had the same conception of taxpayers and the taxpayer's money as we frequently use them. System of government and view of the relationship between government and citizens being different. 2601:40E:100:1540:9547:B573:FD29:9F74 (talk) 07:38, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxpayer 

message: Appears to by copied from [www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/92100.html]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.86.161.147 (talk) 09:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: plagiarized?

message: This isn't really an encyclopedia article — it's a dictionary definition and etymological background of a phrase, which belongs in a dictionary, not an encyclopedia. Accordingly this article should be moved to Wiktionary. Bearcat (talk) 18:53, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiktionary?

message: I heard a different explanation for this phrase a while ago on radio 4, can't remember quite where on that channel and have no source. It went like this 
: Ship yards use to let workers take waste wood home to heat their homes. At some point a new owner started to strictly enforce a maximum size policy on these off-cuts and in order to enforce this policy declared that workers must carry these chips on their shoulders when leaving work. This caused a lot of resentment and so the meaning developed to appy to people who feel resentment at what they see as unfair treatment resulting from their position in an undeclass.Pete the pitiless (talk) 17:42, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  alternative origin
Talk:Scott Adsit

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 11:13, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I saw Scott at DragonCon 2010 (he was on the Amateur Scientist podcast) and he said he also went to DragonCon the year before so I'm wondering if his appearance at Heroes Con is really notable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.169.13.118 (talk) 19:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heroes Con Notability 

message: We need an article for the fictional version of Scott Adsit. Dude has done a lot of noteable things. Lots42 (talk) 14:34, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The fictional version 

message: The article cites two different places as his place of birth. Is there a reliable source that cites Minnesota as his place of birth? Erezc1 (talk) 15:29, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was he born?
Talk:Glen and Les Charles

message: There appears to be no consensus to merge this article with that of his brother, Les Charles, so I am going to remove it from the main article. 
I believe there is no compelling reason to merge as each have 
Feel free to discuss here on the talk page.
Fullrabb 12 April 2012
:I've already merged before I got into the talk page. I hope it's not a mistake. --George Ho (talk) 16:15, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Les Charles

message: We give birthdate 1943-02-18 for Glen Charles, no source. Library of Congress Authorities gives 1943-02-08 .
We give no data for Les. LC Authorities gives 1948-03-25 
P.S. There are no distinct catalog records for Les. The catalog record for Cheers, season six  abbreviates full credits as "written by Glen Charles ... [et al.] ; directed by James Burrows ... [et al.]." --P64 (talk) 15:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Scott Bukatman

message: The following are notability criteria for academics, none of which seem to be met by Bukatman:
:1. The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
:2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level.
:3. The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g. a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a Fellow of a major scholarly society for which that is a highly selective honor (e.g. the IEEE).
:4. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions.
:5. The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or "Distinguished Professor" appointment at a major institution of higher education and research.
:6. The person has held a major highest-level elected or appointed academic post at a major academic institution or major academic society.
:7 The person has made substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity.
:8. The person is or has been the head or chief editor of a major well-established academic journal in their subject area.
:9. The person is in a field of literature (e.g writer or poet) or the fine arts (e.g. musician, composer, artist), and meets the standards for notability in that art, such as WP:CREATIVE or WP:MUSIC.--64.134.97.41 (talk) 22:11, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Scott Burns (record producer)

message: I'm currently listening to a Gravity Kills remix called 
Enough (Scott Burns Metal Mix)
Gravity Kills
Enough (U.K. promo single) (1996)
link came from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nhm4Iq5X7w8, which has 3 separate links to the mp3. 
Is this verifiable enough to add to the article? Don't want to do original research or anything, I came here because I wanted to know who Scott Burns was, and didn't see this remix noted. 75.155.39.34 (talk) 21:55, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Salem Weekly

message: This still needs work despite not getting deleted. I'll see what I can do over the next few days. Katr67 20:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 
Talk:Scott Forstall

message: I think he's like Steve, leave as a loser and come back as a champion and hero. 
Anywho, I'm weirded out by how his almost dramatic leave from the company is written as some sort of regular event with no details at all. It is confirmed that his personality back then had him not getting along with Jony Ive, these are confirmed reports online. There's no way Apple would fire a vet like him over maps and nothing else. 
I mean there simply is no way that Scott would have done these coverups Craig Federighi did or allowed Apple to commit crimes against so many humans for this long. NO way he would have aided these crimes. And that's why I think his biography on Wikipedia should do him justice.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.112.240.232 (talk) 16:27, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  About his leave from Apple
Talk:Scott Frank

message: Once again, Wikipedia allows the "born to a Jewish family" tag to identify people born Jewish, when the religions of non-Jewish people are, by comparison, only very rarely mentioned. It's a thinly-veiled anti-Semitic practice that Wikipedia actively enables, and it's disgraceful.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.230.50.120 (talk) 22:33, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Semitic "Jew-tagging" 

message: The redirect Laughter in the Dark (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 21:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Laughter in the Dark (upcoming film)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Ibrahim ibn Sinan

message: *1.  R Rashed, Biography in Dictionary of Scientific Biography (New York 1970-1990). 
Books:
*2. A S Saidan (ed.), Ibrahim ibn Sinan, The works of Ibrahim ibn Sinan (Arabic) (Kuwait, 1983). 
Articles:
*3. S A Krasnova, Notes on the 'Book on the construction of three conic cross-sections' by Ibrahim ibn Sinan (Russian), Istor.-Mat. Issled. 16 (1965), 437-446.
*4. B A Rozenfel'd and M M Rozanskaja, Geometric transformations and change of variables in the writings of Ibrahim ibn Sinan (Russian), in History and Methodology of Natural Sciences IX : Mechanics, Mathematics (Moscow, 1970), 178-181.
*5. F Sezgin, History of Arabic literature (German) Vol. 5 (Leiden, 1974), 292-295.
*6. F Sezgin, History of Arabic literature (German) Vol. 6 (Leiden, 1978), 193-195.
*7. A P Yushkevich, Note sur les déterminations infinitésimales chez Thabit ibn Qurra, Archives internationales d'histoire des sciences 66 (1964), 37-45.
:I ill look for moreJ8079s (talk) 00:29, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  source dump 

message: The article says he was born and died in Baghdad, but it also says “from Harran.” Which one is right? CielProfond (talk) 22:01, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was he from?