lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kashrut/Archive 4

message: The text added at 17:38 on 20 Jun 2005 by 82.35.52.157 includes this:
The laws of Kashrut also conform to a general rule that human societies tend to separate food animals from companion animals, whether pets or working animals. For instance, where dogs are kept as pets, they are not eaten; in most countries, where horses are used as draft animals they are not eaten, but in countries where oxen and cows are used as draft animals, such as India, they are not eaten.
These comments might make more sense if 82.35.52.157 could demonstrate that the ancient Israelites kept dogs and pigs as pets or draft animals.--Keeves 02:24, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Companion animals? 

message: Some food psychologists point out the similarity between the laws as laid out in Leviticus and the natural 'disgust' reaction that all people generally show to novel meats (see the work of Paul Rozin). That suggests that the food taboos were a codification of existing practice rather than the imposition of a new rule, an attempt to give a religious explanation for an existing state of affairs in which the early Israelites did not eat pork etc. while other groups they knew did. Certainly, the 'disgust' reaction to novel meats helps maintain the taboo over time. The 'disgust' reaction is specific to novel foods derived from animals rather than plant materials, which explains why the laws of Kashrut, like most religious taboos, are unconcerned by plant-derived foods
I'd like to point out two things to the submitter:
1. Can you provide sources? (otherwise, I'm tempted to revert this as original research)
2. This is not true! Plenty of Kashrus lawys are concerned with plant derived foods. Perhaps in the modern non-religious mind the primary focus of the laws is on meat, but strict kosher laws regulate plant consumption as well. Mikeage 08:19, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I missed the reference to Paul Rozin. I don't know who he is, but let me read up on him in the meantime. Nevertheless, I think my point about plant laws stands.Mikeage 08:21, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Food Taboos
Talk:Lunar Anime

message: The AFD defaulted to keep, but I noticed that many of the votes suggested merging this into fansub, so maybe that's what should be done. Does anyone wish to write a section on Lunar Anime in the fansub article? Speaking of which, same should be done for Dattebayo. After that we can wipe + redirect this article. --  Ynhockey (Talk) 10:04, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Serving channel

message: It has been proposed that this article be moved to Serving channel, due to the fact that the article is describing what is more commonly known as a "Serving channel" on IRC... then redirect Depot channel to Serving channel...
*Support as nominator... - Adolphus79 20:34, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Before I can make descion as an admin, please provide some evidence as to the usage of the seperate terms. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 02:13, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: the only evidence I can provide is that I live in IRC myself, and one of my fellow servers brought this page to my attention (as I am the Wiki-geek of the group), and we all laughed that it was called a depot channel... on IRC, we refer to channels which share files (whatever files they may be) as a Serving Channel... this article is more closely describing an MP3 sharing channel (due to the commands listed), and "Depot Channel", if anything, is an out-dated term, generally designated to software (warez) piracy specifically, as far as an overall term for any type of file sharing, they are refered to as serving channels... - Adolphus79 22:56, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ok, done. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 05:52, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Maury Deutsch

message: This page should not be deleted, because just as we would keep a page dedicated to charlie parker, we should keep a page dedicated to his teacher, Mr. Deutsch. Mr. Deutsch once said "Charlie Parker could not even read a sheet of music before me, he was just a natrual born player".
*Alright, I have changed the speedy tag and put it into Articles for Deletion. Go to the article's entry (accesible by clicking on the link at the article's new tag) and discuss why it should not be deleted. Thanks! Sarg 12:15, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kashrut/Archive 6

message: I think this deserves a place in the article. As a Christian Jew I'm often asked to explain when exactly I feel God "repealed the Kashrut laws" and I do remember the story in the New Testament vaguely, but not well enough to put it in the article. It had a sheet.. that god laid down.. with all the animals in it.. and said it was okay to eat if you give thanks...
:There is a specific NT source for the Christian "repealment" of the dietary laws, but I cannot claim to be conversant in the NT. Why do you need to be a "Christian Jew" (whatever that may be) to face this question? Indeed, wasn't Christianity supposed to replace Judaism? JFW | T@lk 21:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: My suggestion is that if someone is going to add a section about this, then it should not talk only about Kashrut, but must explicitly compare Christianity's views on Kashrut with Christianity's views on other Jewish traditions. Suppose someone would add a section to the article on Ramadan, and describe the Jewish attitude to Ramadan; it wouldn't make any sense - why is there a focus on the Jewish attitude to this one particular detail of Islam??? So too, you'd have to supply some context for readers to know why there's a focus on the Christian attitude to this one aspect of Judaism.--Keeves 12:33, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christianity's Attitude 

message: A spontaneous thesis, the kashrut was fomulated (divinely, shamanically, or otherwise) to cope with the hazards of a post-volcanic, toxic environment. This is way out of my ken- enjoy with all due skepticism.  A few things to tie together,
* Kashrut was codified in the aftermath of the Exodus
* The Exodus was thought to be coincident with, even occasioned by, the erruption of Thera
* This also caused a die-off in several populations, destabilising them for years, and present higher than normal carrion rates and disease vectors
* This volcanic erruption caused massive toxic contamination, which would have been subject to bioconcentration.
* Pure herbavores would be relatively isolated from much of this, if grass could be found
* Many of the non-kosher species are opportunistic scavengers (wild pig, raptors) or bioconcentrators (shellfish, insects)
* Bird identification in kashrut is complex, apparently, but isn't a "korkuvan (gizzard, "pupik" in Yiddish) whose inner lining can be peeled" possessed by grainivores, not insectivores or raptors, evading problems of bio-concentration? All the 24 listed non-kosher birds are either shellfish-o-vores, insectivores or raptors.
* Rabbits and pigs feed on roots and burrow in the ground (ok, desperately reaching for something with rabbits, which puzzle me) 
Comments? -SM 17:23, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this actually a published hypothesis, or is this your own theory? JFW | T@lk 23:10, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another ''other reason'', some further random conjecture
Talk:Suicide intervention

message: The whole article appears to be very POV.  Although it does document one particular view of suicide - the medical one - wikipedia shouldn't appear to endorse that view.  The article needs more qualifiers in the text to emphasise that much of what is presented only represents one opinion.212.159.115.35 12:49, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that only discussing one side of an issue is POV in itself as long as the article title makes it clear that this is a POV and not 'the Truth' and ideally I agree that a 'controversies' or 'criticism' section would be helpful. An example is the article on Intelligent Design. Clearly it must focus on describing a minority POV. Antonrojo 03:33, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: "If depression is a major factor, then treatment usually leads to the disappearance of suicidal thoughts."  IF the treatment is actually successful, which it frequently isn't, even though the medical community might perhaps like people to think it is.  If it were that simple there would be far fewer cases of recurring suicide attempts made by people in psychiatric treatment. Akseli 10:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reality check

message: I removed this paragraph from the article:
:Critics of mainstream views about mental health and some advocates of the right to die argue that, far from being a sign of poor mental health, considering or intending to commit suicide can be a rational choice, and that it is the right of  individuals to decide for themselves whether to continue living.
This article is specifically for the medical POV. Right to die advocacy should be taken elsewhere (like the right to die article). MoodyGroove 22:05, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it not a relevant point? It certainly relates to the idea of suicide, and so I think a paragraph should make mention of this existing point of view, even in a small way, with a link to the full article on the right to die. — metaprimer (talk) 13:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Furthermore, the Suicide prevention article mentions this same idea, and is related to intervention. I think even having a link to the right to die article in "See also" would be beneficial. — metaprimer (talk) 13:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Right to die

message: Is there going to be a full medical views article? Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 21:04, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Medical Views

message: The article makes mention of there being a Catch-22 situation in the United States, however it's not a true Catch-22 situation. Yes, people who express the intent to harm themselves are deemed unfit to refuse treatment, but if it were a Catch-22 situation, the same would also be true for those who don't express the intent to harm themselves. I'm removing it on this basis. — metaprimer (talk) 13:13, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catch-22 

message: Just in case, before they get lost some DOI's might be useful as inline citations: Biosthmors (talk) 19:34, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks! —Shelley V. Adams ‹blamecredit› 15:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations?
Talk:Out (website)

message: ::Discussion copied from AfD so as to not crowd the voting process
Article is exclusively POV and unreferenced claims about size: "The website is probably one of the most influential gay community sites (certainly in the UK where it has most of its members)" " The main differentiator of the site is the organization of events that take place in the real world and the emphasis on friendship."  " the largest social networking club for gay people in the UK. The site is free of charge for casual use, and provides member profiles, a messaging system..." " involved with a number of charitable causes" "The site now has around 50,000 active members, and claims rapid growth." Reads like an advertisement. My vote Delete - Glen T C 13:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment Fantastic, if they vote then it stays, that's the idea! And while I agree that its Alexa rank of 35,000 is respectable, as it is the article reads like a PR release or commercial...  All it talks about are its free services, boasts its membership and even its charitable contributions! Maybe a rewrite is in order.. remember this is an ongoing process, if you improve the article then everyone's happy :) - Glen T C 13:52, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are also misunderstanding POV - if I wrote an article about me that just talked about how much money I had, how big my house is, how many BMW's I own and my Black Amex card - it could all be factual (no in my case it's not but you know what I mean) but only shows MY POV. The article needs balance. Hope this helps. - Glen T C 13:58, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

text: David currently the article IS unsubstantiated. And unreferenced is certainly not emotive. And rest assured this is not 'speedy delete' and certainly not an immediate process. Let's take this to the talk page of the article as this is not the place okay? - Glen T C 14:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Out (website)]] 

message: I have fixed up the article.  It may have a slight bent still that I couldn't iron out.  Feel free to fix anything in it. --Mboverload 20:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Latest Edit removing ad-like quality

message: I agree with the edits - the article is certainly improved, and the stub status
fits well. How will this affect the consideration for deletion? Can we remove this
now? David scholefield 11:35, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion Marking?

message: Yes. They are the same thing - so obviously that it doesn't seem worth discussing it. I'll happily merge the two myself later today if I get a moment. David L Rattigan 09:00, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Denys Rayner

message: Not sure if it is just me but I found section 2 'Writer' unreadable. The quote from Roskill is very relevant but some of the other parts, particularly the section from the Amazon review onward, I found very heavy going and switched me off reading further (and I am very interested in Rayner).  I stress that it may just be my personal opinion but I think that the section 'Writer' should be factual with the opinions considerably compacted.  Boatman 12:41, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First comment 

message: Certainly of interest, but the current format looks promotional.
'The Westerly Story' - a history of the company and its boats==
In early 2006 the Vice-Commodore of the Westerly Owners' Association conceived the idea of writing a history of Westerly and the boats they built. ‘The Westerly Story’ by Brian Easteal and Peter Poland, includes an account of Denys Rayner's role in founding the company, designing its first five models, and assuring its future even while gravely ill. This illustrated 112 page book was privately published in November and copies can be obtained from the WOA Membership Administration Office, 19 Willowdale Close, Petersfield, Hampshire GU32 3PS, UK 
Tearlach 04:39, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Westerly Story 

message: I've added some detail on his various commands (I've got the stuff mostly from "Escort"); I've also split the WWII section up a bit, to make it less unwieldy. I trust that's OK with everone. Xyl 54 (talk) 14:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 
Talk:Rift valley

message: no
. See Talk:Rift (geology)
i say no!!
I think it is a good idea and would be less confusing for students like me! : )
ya i agree but as long as long as theres a heading sayin rift valley
--• Storkian • 03:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into [[Rift (geology)]] article? 

message: Changed intro sentence from "The largest freshwater lakes in the world are all located in rift valleys except for Lake Victoria"; the North American great lakes are not in a rift valley.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:9:4F80:80B:39CB:D9EC:78DD:4089 (talk) 22:08, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Rift Valley Lakes

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Rift valley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080709020909/http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/miranda_creation_011016-1.html to http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solarsystem/miranda_creation_011016-1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 — Gorthian (talk) 19:15, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Weapons in Call of Duty 2

message: This article has a little too much POV. King nothing 12:53, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've removed some stuff after looking at it, yes he is right the SMLE, M1093A4, K98k, & Mosin Nagant, all have the same damage. Also the Sten is not weak, looking at the stats it is slightly more powerful than the MP40, which shares damage with the M3, the Thompson & PPS-42 are the same damage wise, and the PPSh is the most powerful. This article isn't needed anymore the list of weapons is in the main COD2 article. King nothing 18:56, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I suggest that some people who are editing this article, check this out first: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. King nothing 21:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can't someone just use the strategy guide or something rather than just describing experiences?! Bibliomaniac15 05:26, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Becker

message: This talk page was previously a redirect to Talk:Becker (TV series) because of a page move. However, as Becker is now a disambiguation page, I've removed that redirect.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 16:13, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk page restored

message: If Becker is a sitcom about John Becker, shouldn't he be listed under the characters section?204.193.204.12 (talk) 22:15, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Becker
Talk:List of Australian politicians

message: Apart from being incomplete, how does this page differ from :Category:Australian politicians? Asked differently: Why is this page here? Who undertakes to maintain it while the rest of us write more articles? --Scott Davis Talk 12:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a relic from before categories existed. I don't really think it has much of a point anymore. Ambi 23:45, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Could be expanded to a comprehensive list - add dates served, electorate and ministerial responsibilities (if applicable). Then it would not be a duplicate. Please see the potential in this article, not what it is at the moment. JROBBO 00:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference?
Talk:Bernard Ramsey

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Doc ask? 12:58, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Free Jimmy

message: I wrote the plot section from what I could understand of various descriptions of the film back then, but reading the no: and nn: articles I see they defer somewhat, at least in focus. It would be good if someone with better knowledge of the film could check the section. Haakon 12:59, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot accuracy 
Talk:Northern hairy-nosed wombat

message: I would just like to suggest that someone should includes research on why it is on the verge of extinction. Or I will do it myself if I can spare some time...Vrkunkel (talk) 00:31, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for Extinction?

message: What native language is this? Enlil Ninlil 00:39, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure but it is from the St George area in Queensland according to Queensland's Threatened Animals edited by Lee K. Curtis, Andrew J. Dennis, Keith R. Macdonald, Stephen J. S. Debus. It is also mentioned in The Secret Life of Wombats by James Woodford as the Aboriginal name first told to Gillespie (don't know who that is) and mentioned in "early textbooks such as Troughton's".
Miss.chelle.13 (talk) 12:17, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Yaminon

message: :This topic was split off from #Yaminon, above.
I'm a little concerned that the photo of the northern hairy-nosed wombat is exactly the same photo as the southern hairy-nosed wombat. Both wiki pages cannot be right, as one animal be an example of two species. A hybrid, yes, but both, no. RobinGrant (talk) 03:37, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I actually just noticed this as well; one of the photos should probably be changed.  There is a discussion going on in the southern wombat's talk page. G man yo (talk) 11:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the picture here, though I made a typo in my edit summary :/ The original source said it was a southern hairy nosed wombat. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 11:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wombat Photo
Talk:Southern hairy-nosed wombat

message: There are two different conservation statuses in the article. Is the appropriate one "vulnerable" or "Least Concern"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.75.49.71 (talk • contribs) .
:It is considered vulnerable by the local conservationist, but only of least concern to global ones. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:49, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservation status 

message: The Picture in this article is the same as the one in the main wombat article, however there it is referred to as the Northern wombat. Can anyone confirm which is correct? --24.92.255.217 03:12, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.wombania.com/wombats/northern-hairy-nosed-wombat.htm states the northern has a longer nose this doesnt, it is short and flat and dark patches around the eyes. The southern has a small nose with white patches above and below the eyes, http://www.wombania.com/wombats/southern-hairy-nosed-wombat.htm. Enlil Ninlil 05:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Final work here is the copywrite holder. http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/resources/eva_hejda/wombatface.jpg/view.html. Enlil Ninlil 09:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I move it to the Northern article. - UtherSRG (talk) 09:59, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

text: But it is suppose to be a southerner. Enlil Ninlil 10:00, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted. Perhaps the image could be reuploaded to a different name? - UtherSRG (talk) 10:48, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: As the Southern Hairy-nosed Wombat is the Faunal Emblem of the state of South Australia, I strongly suggest (per WP:TIES)  that the instances of U.S. English spelling be changed to Australian English. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 03:34, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to Australian English
Talk:Bangaarada Manushya

message: barathi link is not linking to actress bharathi —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 220.227.179.4 (talk • contribs) 13:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Honda F engine

message: *It needs citations, beyond "a particular internet forum".  Internet forums are not generally accepted sources, especially when you don't list them by name.
*With citations comes fact-checking and verification.  The engine specs are easy to verify, but claiming that Mitsubishi adapted a Honda engine for their own cars is a pretty grand claim to make without sources.
*It needs to conform to style conventions.  The engines should be categorized into sections and use bulleted lists for specifications for readability's sake, like I did with the F20B.  Huge swaths of italicised text aren't easy on the eyes.
*It needs to present a wordwide view.  Before I added the F20B it was only US engines.
AKADriver 13:18, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs serious help 

message: Hi! I'm from Germany and I'm driving the Accord Aerodeck of 1996 (in Germany Type CE2). The German Aerodeck CE2 comes with the F20B3 engine. The other Aerodeck in Germany is Type CE1. It has the F22B engine. Don't know whether B1, B2 or which else it has.
Also is the CD5 written in brackets, after the Coupe was mentioned. The CD5 is the US Sedan and has the F22B engine.CWeitzer (talk) 16:03, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Added the Aerodeck at the F20B3 engine. Source is the German wikipedia: []CWeitzer (talk) 08:41, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  F20B3 engine 

message: Engine found in "USA" versions of V gen Accord made for European market? Korbik (talk) 10:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  And what about F22B5 

message: F18B Himakoma Muhundika (talk) 08:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honda accord