lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:82 G. Eridani

message: Several sources suggest this star has an infrared excess, which may indicate a debris disk. However, beyond that I haven't found much data.—RJH (talk) 22:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debris disk 

message: 3 planets it's been found around HD20794 (82 Eridani): The HARPS search for Earth-like planets in the habitable zone: I -- Very low-mass planets around HD20794, HD85512 and HD192310 
http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.3447  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.83.13.45 (talk) 01:00, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planetary system 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Weak Oppose it's not a Flamsteed designation. (If it were, it wouldn't have the "G.", which indicates that it isn't) It is a Gould designation. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 23:23, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The article never makes this clear. One scientist speculating about a 5% chance does not represent scientific consensus, nor is it very clear. Is it within the generally theorized habitable zone or not? If not, is it in the theorized border range of a habitable planet? If so what are the specifics? Cliffswallow-vaulting (talk) 07:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Are some planets in the habitable zone?

message: This article on a possible planet in the 82 Eridani system was recently created by User:Jtadesse. I'm redirecting it to here, since this planet isn't clearly confirmed (there are different models of the system in different sources, and this planet only appears in one source so far), and this name also isn't used by any source - the system is commonly referred to as 82 Eridani or HD 20794, not Gliese 139, and the "d" designation refers to a different planet in most sources.
Also, as mentioned at Talk:K2-332 b, much of the article's content is speculation about habitability based on sources not specifically about this planet. This belongs in one of the articles about planetary habitability, if it's not already there.
I would consider the minimum requirements for creation of a separate article on this object to be a second source confirming its existence, and a consensus on its designation, neither of which currently exist. SevenSpheres (talk) 17:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Gliese 139 d]] 

message: Might as well do this - here's a table summarizing the history of detections in this system. Only two planets are clearly confirmed, usually called b & d. Currently, the outer candidate discussed above is the only other one that seems likely. SevenSpheres (talk) 04:09, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table
Talk:Jet, Oklahoma

message: Why the name? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:10, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Named for W M Jett, miller and first postmaster from George Shirk's Oklahoma Place Names.Narthring (talk  • contribs) 03:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 
Talk:832 Karin

message: This needs to be rewritten for clarity.  I assume the cluster was first recognized in 2002.  It is definitely strange that that is mentioned, while the discovery of the minor planet is only referred to in a table.
Why?  How is the recognition of the Karin Cluster relevant?  The article needs to explain that.216.96.78.19 (talk) 17:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovered in 1916, found in 2002??
Talk:Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

message: Declaration of Conflict of Interest: This page was created by an employee of the ASMFC. As such, I have only posted very basic informational material from the ASMFC's website.
Americanquixote 19:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest
Talk:Florence Goodenough

message: If anyone wants to build upon this article, this site and this site seem to be good sources of info.  --Grant M 04:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: I have posted a bibliography of   Intelligence Citations for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in those issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research and to suggest new sources to me by comments on that page. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 20:14, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to IQ Testing 

message: I've added some content and references but I am rather new at this and I need a little help with organization. Let me know what I can do.--Benvdo (talk) 01:57, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I've added a couple scholarly sources and a Works section for the pages (with links to the Goodenough books available on Archive.org). I noted that several of the links to online bios seem to be dead and should be removed, however they are currently being used as sources in the main article, so I've left them for now. --HistorianOfPsychology (talk) 05:09, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates

message: — Assignment last updated by Ohuqq (talk) 22:21, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: History of Science to Newton
Talk:Oliver O'Grady

message: It is difficult to believe that one can write a biography of a convicted pedophile and presume that indvidual will not molest again because he is "currently undergoing counseling" and has "voluntarily" registered himself as a known sex offender.  The psychotherapeutic community recognizes there are no efficaceous treatments available for this condition and as such, it is impossible to state with any degree of certitude that a pedophile can be trusted around children at any time.  The greatest criticism you level at director Amy Berg, that she failed to gain permission from the families of the children on the playground to use their names when presumably, they have not (yet) been molested by O'Grady indicates the level to which one must stoop when attempting to exonerate the deviate in question.  Ms. Berg's motive in placing O'Grady near the playground is a simple one:  she wants it known that this man's served his debt to society and as such, is free to roam at will wherever he wishes.  He is free to visit this and other playgrounds anytime he wishes and legally, nothing can be done about it.--SusanMarina 04:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: His freedom

message: I Live in Lodi,Ca and went to the same church I cant believe they would make a movie about such a sick person!!!!!
What ever happend to respect for the victims.Rob-Lodi
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.182.74.3 (talk • contribs) 
::The (now grown) victims and their parents willingly participated in the movie, as they thought it was an important issue. No victims are "outed" in the movie. It sounds like you haven't seen it.Codenamemary (talk) 20:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie

message: Has there been any study of the movie "Deliver Us From Evil" that has determined O'Grady is a sociopath? He;s clearly showing sociopathic behavior but I am not an expert. Can somebody locate such a study so that it can be cited and put up on this page?--Dr who1975 18:18, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sociopath

message: I am an adult survivor of childhood sexual abuse.  I was not abused by a priest as I was raised in the Catholic Church, but by a man that I trusted.  It has taken most of my adult life to try to make some sense of it all.  It makes no sense!!!  We, the victims, aren't even sure what's happening to us until we are old enough to be sexually active.  Then, we are in the middle of a living nightmare.  Convicted, known Pedophiles should never be allowed to be around children EVER!  That is punishment.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.247.147.251 (talk) 13:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How sad for the children 

message: Father O'Grady redirects here; however, there is at least one other "Father O'Grady" with an article, namely: John O'Grady (priest) (I don't know how such things are handled). --Thanks for your attention to this matter. 2606:A000:1126:4CA:0:98F2:CFF6:1782 (talk) 18:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed
Talk:852 Wladilena

message: The planet seems to have been named some time after it was discovered. All minor planets orbit the sun.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.72.219 (talk) 13:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: How do you know when it was named? Lenin was already a prominent person in April 1916 (at least for other communists. He was leader of the Bolsheviks since 1903). --MrBurns (talk) 22:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Guisarme

message: "The wielder of the guisarme carries it in his right hand, resting on his left shoulder." does this really have anything to do with anything?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dannysjgdf (talk • contribs) 05:27, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevance

message: The guisarme, by its very title refers just to a pruning hook: perhaps with a nail-like spike as an adaptation. Anything incorporating a full spear blade becomes a bill-guisarme; which again accurately describes the combination. Its origin may have come from some perceived piety in using the weapon rather than one with a spear point...--94.192.224.12 (talk) 11:34, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The etymology of guisarme is a bit speculative, but OHG getisarna - weed - iron- is a possible.  Do you have a source for the religious connection, or is it speculation? Monstrelet (talk) 10:23, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming and Origins 

message: Pretty sure the image is actually of a fauchard...
Theblindsage (talk) 20:11, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I'd say it was a sparth - a fauchard curves the other way like a sickle.  The interesting thing is the 14th century artist, illustrating a giserne, drew it like this.  So guisarme may have had a less clear meaning to contemporaries than it appears to to us.Monstrelet (talk) 16:45, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a Bardiche! LamontCranston (talk) 09:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: A term not attested in England until centuries later, so not a bardiche, though the similarities are noticeable. Monstrelet (talk) 10:59, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:85D/Boethin

message: I've come across a weird theory telling that the Boethin comet is the same object as the WD5 asteroid. However, the only source I found is this article. So it is certainly a hoax, be warned. Kromsson (talk) 14:46, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wild theory 

message: Citation from http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/NASA_Sends_Spacecraft_On_Mission_To_Comet_Hartley_2_999.html
:"Scientists theorize comet Boethin may have broken up into pieces too small for detection."
I am experienced amateur astronomer strongly interested in comets. Comet 85P was observed on 1975 and 1986 apparitions and was not observed in 1997 and (yet) 2008 apparitions  . I know that comet Boethin never broke up! We could lose it because of non-gravitational forces [?] or non-stable brightness. There was no attempts to recover this comet on 1997 because it was almost exactly behind the Sun . On 2008 there was few (negative) attempts to recover it (down to 25 mag) .
Therefore, I delete the citation. — Chesnok (talk) 08:40, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's interesting, but Yahoo groups are not a reliable source. Even if you had a reliable source that states this point of view, we should include both hypotheses, to satisfy encyclopedic breadth. --Dhartung | Talk 22:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The New York Times is not a reliable source. At Yahoo groups, there is many competent astronomers but Henry Fountain is not an astronomer. — Chesnok (talk) 08:02, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Comet Boethin never broke up!
 
Talk:Kellyville, Oklahoma

message: I found the accident report at https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/48418 WhisperToMe (talk) 00:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accident report of 1917 collision
Talk:Ahlspiess

message: This video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HtjSS5FmQc0 at 15 minutes, also calls it the eel spear.  If other sources use the same alternate name, then you might want to add it to the article.  • Sbmeirow • Talk • 20:52, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  alternate names
Talk:Bec de corbin

message: Moving this here from the article:
:It could also refer to the first surgical tool used to grasp a blood vessel prior to ligating it developed by Ambroise Pare.
Editor Huckfinne seems to be attempting to change this article about a Medieval European pole weapon into a disambiguation page for "things known as a bec de corbin".  If the subject of his contribution (an early surgical instrument) is noteworthy, a disambiguation page should be created ("Bec de corbin") to list both meanings, with only the pole weapon linking to this article, and this article moved to "Bec de corbin (weapon)".  If the subject of his contribution is not noteworthy, then it should be allowed to die here in talk. 12.233.146.130 (talk) 22:44, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant information 

message: Article has no image of weapon, can anyone get to a museum and take a photo of this weapon? -EarthFurst (talk) 15:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  no image of weapon 
Talk:Man catcher

message: Unlike many weird polearms, this one is genuine rather than an RPG invention; I have seen a picture of two. However I am skeptical of many of the additional details in this article. We claim it will pass around a man-sized cylinder but the two in my picture are far too small for that, they are clearly meant to catch an arm or leg. (And the spikes are thus logically there to stop the limb from simply being withdrawn.) We also claim Man catchers played a role in the medieval custom of capturing noble opponents for ransom but my reference states they were used to apprehend fugitives. Further these two are dated to the 16th and early 17th century which is a bit late for mediaeval customs. -- Securiger 12:13, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Invented in India by Indian Saints then taken to China and Japan 1500 years ago and reachead Europe in medieval times? 185.18.60.191 (talk) 18:39, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:872 Holda

message: I think the asteroid is more likely named after the Holda from Frau Holle - but there is no information on the JPL page - I would like to change it, adding a proviso to the article that this naming is an educated guess, Max Wolf being being German, and will generally expand the article a bit. Is this ok?
JojoTNO (talk) 14:30, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Horseman's pick

message: This article seems to be a stub because there's simply not much that is worth writing about the subject; after all, the actual medieval men-at-arms didn't seem to have placed the "horseman's pick" or whatever into a different category from the warhammer, so I think this weapon should simply be treated as a common (i.e. not particularly distinctive) variant of the warhammer. Lay (talk) 14:47, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with War Hammer 

message: The phrase 'The horseman's pick was like a farmers tool' was added to this article as a sole modification, and without citing any sources or explaining further, by an unregistered user last January. I'm going to remove that now, KTHXBAI.
If the phrase made some more sense, I'd just slam citation needed on it.81.202.46.50 (talk) 16:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Like a farmers tool? 

message: No clue?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.70.145.77 (talk) 17:18, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islamic origin ? 

message: This article is over a decade old but has no sources? If no reliable sources can be found it should be removed.
64.228.218.165 (talk) 11:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of sources ? 

message: This article has no sources, and I can find none referencing this weapon. As far as I can tell this is a holdover from videogames and tabletop games, and that the "horseman's pick" never existed as a thing distinct from the war hammer. 142.166.152.166 (talk) 11:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This should be deleted
Talk:Ordinary Mind School

message: hmmm,
I am new to this but i would like to defend the notability issue regarding an article I wrote on the Ordinary Mind school. I did not even create the wikipedia title "Ordinary Mind School", it was already highlighted in a write up about Charlotte Joko Beck. But, when I clicked on the existing link I found there was nothing there, so I wrote something.
I believe this information is quite "notable" since there are already articles about the founder of this school, but no explanations about what the school is about, even though there is a link with this title. Any serious Zen student in the US would certify the importance of this school in the present and future course of Zen practice in the United States.
What I wrote is not an opinion as I have studied within this school for 23 years and am very familiar with it's culture. I think one could verify my article by talking with other students of the school. --Mikepapas 04:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Mike. Your good intentions are apparent. Let me tell you a bit about what is meant by "notable" as we use it for purposes of this encyclopedia. It does not refer to importance or fame or worth or whether we like the subject or not. It refers to whether the world at large has deemed a subject notable by making it the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject itself. For more on notability, see Wikipedia:Notability. So my suggestion is that you attempt to find reliable sources which deal with this subject and cite them in the article. That is the best route to avoid deletion.--Fuhghettaboutit 06:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I redirected it to Ordinary Mind Zen School; unfortunately that also needs the same type of sourcing. --NE2 06:55, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hangon
Talk:887 Alinda

message: Currently, the article says Alinda makes close approaches to Earth, including a pass at 12.3 Gm in January 2025. Huh? Just what is a Gm? Is it GigaMeters? I'm assuming that's what it means, and I'm rewording it to make it more readable. —MiguelMunoz (talk) 09:39, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  12.3 Gm
Talk:89 Aquarii

message: I suspect that this is c3 Aquarii, but I can't find a reliable source. Ardric47 (talk) 20:48, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I added a source; see this edit. Ardric47 (talk) 21:21, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bayer designation?
Talk:Kingston, Oklahoma

message: Where exactly in Kingston should the picture be of?
Let me know and I will take it.
21:58, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Of What???????

message: Please help me add history for the town of Kingston. Jsniessen (talk) 19:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: History help
Talk:Tucano people

message: There are some on flickr but none under free license. I asked photographer  with a large set () if he would like to release some but after exchanging few messages he stopped replying :( --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:16, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just noticed there were four unused images relating to Tucano people in Wikimedia Commons. -Uyvsdi (talk) 17:33, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice find, through neither of those we currently have actually shows people. Perhaps if more people contacted photographers on Flickr we would get someone to share a pic? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:35, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good luck! It's worth a try. It would be awesome to have photos of living people in every tribe's article. -Uyvsdi (talk) 06:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures
Talk:Winner Take All (game show)

message: Is there any source on the existence of “Television Today” as a film that still exists? I’ve called CBS in DC and other places and have not been able to find it Rogay (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Television Today
Talk:9 Aurigae

message: I'd like as I had to ponder it for about 30 seconds to replace "a periodic Doppler Shift" with something that more adequately explains itself; I would prefer the words "continuous Doppler Shift of the absorption lines over a repeating cycle of ...days".  I know that's terribly long-winded and meets with my disgust also for that, but it does more justice to what is happening, not some sort of stop-start, sporadic changes in the frequency/wavelength within most of the electromagnetic waves reaching us which the words currently used could equally suggest to the physically uneducated.- Adam37 Talk 19:06, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, periodic could be interpreted as intermittent.  I even thought about it as I wrote it and decided to go with it anyway.  I know what it means :)  Some other explanation might be better.  There are all sorts of radial velocity variations from stars, and the sort that indicates a binary companion is very specific.  You could fudge it by comparing to a sine wave, although the variation isn't necessarily strictly sinusoidal.  There is an article radial velocity method, heavily focussed on exoplanets but equally applicable to binary stars.  Maybe some form of words from there could be adapted, or even a picture.  I was just reading at spectroscopic binary, and perhaps mentioning the spectral lines moving back and forth to bluer and redder wavelengths would help.  Or go with the less is more approach: mention Doppler shift or radial velocity or something similar, but leave out the details.  Lithopsian (talk) 20:02, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Too succinct or jargonistic at one point
Talk:Sword bayonet

message: I have never heard of a 'yataghan' bayonet, or any curved bayonet at all. That may merely reflect my ignorance, but I am suspicious. I'm not aware of any Turkish or Arabic culture that had a tradition of 'massed armies' trained in the use of pike. Thus, not tradition of 'infantry squares', and thus no reason to develop the bayonet. 
Theblindsage (talk) 03:35, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:List of Bengali-language authors (chronological)

message: There is already a List of Bengali authors. This page should be merged with that one. Rumpelstiltskin223 04:53, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The unknown years in this article have been marked with a "????" sign. If you know any of these dates/years, please replace the ???? mark with the information. It would also make sense to go to the article on the author and add this new piece of information there.-Arman Aziz 04:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unknown Dates

message: The minimum criterion to be enlisted here is to have a separate wikipedia article. So, please create an article on an author first and then add him/her to the list. Else please add the name to the list of potential entries above. --Arman (Talk) 04:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add name to the list 

message: AR Asim Kumar Roy (talk) 03:57, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  English and bengali
Talk:Arne Domnérus

message: In 1958 RCA Camden released "Swedish Modern Jazz" by Arne Domnerus (CAL 417). The performances are all from 1956 (& 1957?) with the same musicians except on 2 tracks. 2 online sources for this information are https://outletjazz.blogspot.com/2023/04/arne-domnerus-and-his-group-swedish.html and https://www.discogs.com/release/14211704-Arne-Domnerus-And-His-Group-Swedish-Modern-Jazz The outlet jazz site has the most information including original liner notes but seems to have mistakenly assigned some recordings to March 1957 instead of March 1956. RobOnontroppo (talk) 16:37, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible addition to discography of Arne Domnerus