lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Beaufort's Dyke

message: A few news sources say that the feature is named after Irish hydrographer Francis Beaufort, which seems plausible, and one even goes as far to say that he discovered it. I can't find any strong evidence of either, though. Is there any genuine connection?
An 1856 publication attributes its discovery to a Captain Beechey, presumably (although I haven't yet seen a source that explicitly says so) Frederick William Beechey.--Lord Belbury (talk) 23:15, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Francis Beaufort
Talk:Japanese money

message: Should this really be a disambiguation page? I should think that the subject of "Japanese money" is more elaborate, complex, and interesting than simply linking to three different types of coin. LordAmeth 23:41, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe this should provide a general overview of this history of Japanese currencies. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 00:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed.  Joe  I 19:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion?
Talk:Galway hooker

message: This article could do with a picture!  Either an old picture that is out of copyright or a modern picture contributed under GFDL or similar.  If anyone would like to contribute and needs advice on how to do so, please leave a message here or on my talk page. --Red King (talk) 19:45, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added an image that I found via commons, however I think one showing a vessel (or several) under sail in Galway Bay might be more stylish, if anyone in that area could upload one. Sswonk (talk) 14:17, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture needed
Talk:Integration clause

message: I am unaware of any common usage for integration clauses other than regarding the parol evidence rule (however, I am only a first year student and so may be entirely wrong, which is why I am initiating discussion instead of simply merging).  I will start fleshing out the parol evidence rule page with more on everything, and will delete this page when all information has been transferred.DOH (talk) 01:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Discussion

message: I think modern jurisprudence says that an integration clause raises a rebuttable presumption of complete integration. I'll edit upon confirmation. -- 69.88.118.242
:Geezus, yes, you're right.  That article is W-R-O-N-G on an incredibly fundamental aspect of those clauses.  I just fixed it.  Lawyer2b (talk) 23:51, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This depends on jurisdiction.  In a Williston jurisdiction (Two-Part Test), a proper merger clause establishes a presumption of complete integration, which I don't believe is rebuttable.  The Corbin test, OTOH, takes all evidence into consideration including the factors in Hatley.DOH (talk) 01:07, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Effect of Integration Clause
Talk:Gelderland

message: I was wondering if any one knows what Gelder means.  I live in NY, USA, and there is a Guilderland here and I was wondering if it was the same word because the Dutch settled near there.  216.227.83.18 23:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: On the 2nd of June, 2011 the external link http://geodata.prv.gelderland.nl/geostart.asp?appl=3 appeared to be dead. Now, this may be caused by today being Ascension Day. So, anyone who sees this message, is invited to try the link again. Cheers. --MrGardiner (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The link was still dead. I removed it. PiusImpavidus (talk) 16:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link
Talk:William Joseph Chaminade

message: i think somebody should read "running giant" and use it to expand the article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.253.6.176 (talk) 00:17, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  runnung giant 

message: Per WP:FRMOS and consistency with other post-medieval articles this really should be at Guillaume-Joseph Chaminade; 1761 -1850 is too late to anglicize the name. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:52, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: French name
Talk:The Mugwumps (band)

message: Track Listing of Album
I can see no reason why the track listing of the album should have been removed as "copyrighted material".  This is nonsense and the listing should be restored.  Skinsmoke 17:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The releases listed for this band came two years after Cass and Denny joined the Mamas and Papas and a couple years after Sebestian formed the Lovin' Spoonful, too. Were these 1967 releases a case of unreleased material being issued due to its members becoming famous elsewhere or is this more correctly categorized as a side gig? 136.159.160.122 (talk) 21:43, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The top of their pictured album reads "An Historic Recording Late Summer of '64..."  So this is a later release of material recorded earlier. DougHill (talk) 20:54, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Were Cass and Denny in the Mugwumps same time as M&Ps? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lightoil (talk) 16:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The Mugwumps (band) →  – No other page with this name. Jax 0677 (talk) 13:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Oppose.  The Mugwumps should redirect to Mugwumps, the primary topic. 162 etc. (talk) 14:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably best to remain with a dab then. I would weakly support the original proposal, as the band are exclusively known with "The" while the activists are not, but overall maybe nothign to choose between them.  — Amakuru (talk) 14:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. pageviews are relatively similar over 90 days with a small recent bump for the band, probably an album release or something definitely something other than a release, I just noticed the years active lol.  ASUKITE 15:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah maybe the DAB would be best of which it already goes to. Crouch, Swale (talk)  19:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 May 2024
Talk:Martin's Cove

message: Could we get a map showing what part of Wyoming this is?  DigitalEnthusiast 23:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map
Talk:StarFire (navigation system)

message: Hello all,
I am a farmer from Australia and currently use the Starfire2 system. I think the article is very informative and helped me to understand how this system differs from other systems. This article should not be deleted! The sentance that says "This is the most accurate GPS correction system currently available, with more than enough accuracy for fully automated driving systems", should either be deleted or backed up with citations. (from independant research). I will delete this sentance within a week if there are no objections.--Yendor72 (talk) 01:13, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims of accuracy ?
Talk:Royal Mail Ship

message: The entry for the QE2 list a future date and fate.  Is this mere prescience and should not its present status be reflected?  Oxonhutch 09:50, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: QE2

message: Should the designation RMV be in this article, as there are current vessels which carry this prefix, such as RMV Scillonian III? Scillystuff (talk) 23:19, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: RMV?

message: RMS Somerset, 1878 Pvladko (talk) 23:13, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RMS Somerset 

message: I added this ship because it is mentioned at http://newspaperarchive.com/jm/kingston/kingston/kingston-gleaner/1909/03-10/page-32?tag=beutinger&rtserp=tags/?pl=beutinger&page=3&pci=4. (Second column from the right.) BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 02:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Oruba''

message: While the RMS claim  for Segwun is not improbable, the exceptional statement that, uniquely, only Segwun retains RMS status in Canada requires a good citation, and I have tagged the ship's article accordingly. So far as this article is concerned, some parts may need tweaking also, particularly in the lead:  
* Segwun is not a "seagoing vessel"
* Neither has the ship ever been "under contract to the British Royal Mail".  Canada has had its own postal service since the 1860s, also known as Royal Mail, though Canada Post apparently phased that name out in the 1960s - nevertheless it remains a crown corporation in relation to "Her Majesty in right of Canada". Davidships (talk) 23:23, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[RMS Segwun|RMS ''Segwun'']] 

message: It was scrapped. Why does the entry say ‘wrecked’??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:E284:CF00:35FC:7CB4:19B6:F6E1 (talk) 08:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Samaria
Talk:Donna the Buffalo

message: I removed the notability template.  One of the WP:BAND notability criteria is "Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable)."  Donna the Buffalo has released four albums on Sugar Hill Records, an independent label dating to 1978 now owned by Concord Music Group.  Their artists include Nickel Creek, Ricky Skaggs, and Dolly Parton.  I believe this establishes notability.  DragonflyDC (talk) 04:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Monell Chemical Senses Center

message: Currently, there is a difference of opinion as to which stub category into which this should be sorted. Currently rejected templates include:
*--(as a result of my absentmindedness)
*
I have suggested either a  or just a general  Any and all comments are welcome, and the best solution would be to expand this past a stub, so that this would not be a problem.--Vox Causa 00:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A consensus was reached, by adding  and --Vox Causa 01:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub Disagreement

message: Not to step on toes, but much of this article reads like material taken from a promotional brochure.  Was it? GcT (talk) 19:43, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral POV?
Talk:Grant

message: Please add these back when articles are present or anticipated:
=== Red-links with no other inbound links ===
*Grant, South Australia
=== Non-article entries ===
* Grant Island, New Malden
* Grant, a steering wheel manufacturer
*GRANT, an SQL command
== December 2008
:I've added a cross-reference, where the 'given name' usage is listed first.  In general on disambiguation pages people are not listed by first name; typically on a dab page where a name can be used as either a surname for given name, the surname uses are listed but not the give name usage.  This is not always true, but is often so.  One way that you can cross-reference to people by first name is to use the PrefixAllPages template, which does appear on some dab pages and which I've added to the page. Ceyockey ()talk to me) 01:05, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removals and reasons 

message: * Grant Island, New Malden
* Grant, a steering wheel manufacturer
*GRANT, an SQL command
== December 2008
:I've added a cross-reference, where the 'given name' usage is listed first.  In general on disambiguation pages people are not listed by first name; typically on a dab page where a name can be used as either a surname for given name, the surname uses are listed but not the give name usage.  This is not always true, but is often so.  One way that you can cross-reference to people by first name is to use the PrefixAllPages template, which does appear on some dab pages and which I've added to the page. Ceyockey ()talk to me) 01:05, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-article entries 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grant_Imahara  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HelpMeChoose55 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out Grant (given name) -- Fyrael (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Grant Imahara?
Talk:Sonia Olschanezky

message: Merging Sonya and Sonia would seem a no-brainer, no?  They are essentially the same article about the same person in two places.  Lindsay H. 00:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I intend to rename (move) this page in a few days as her name is Sonia, not Sonya, as noted in a number of books (e.g., 'Flames in the Field' by Rita Kramer and 'A Life in Secrets: Vera Atkins and the Missing Agents of WWII' by Sarah Helm) and on a memorial to her - https://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=pv&GRid=66271597&PIpi=50772073 - so if anyone has any objections please say so. CodeBadger (talk) 05:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename (move) page
Talk:Speculative Grammarian

message: Not sure why the two names are listed separately... AnonMoos (talk) 15:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ken Miner is Metalleus, right?

message: It was great, he really didn't talk امیررضا ممانی (talk) 15:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very good
Talk:Thermodynamic temperature/Archive 1

message: === Issue ===
The issue under dispute is whether a preamble announcing that the article is intended for a general audience should be included at the top of the article.
=== Parties ===
Support Inclusion:
Please sign with ~~~~.
# 
Oppose Inclusion:
Please sign with ~~~~.
# Loom91 10:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute over preamble 

message: Support Inclusion:
Please sign with ~~~~.
# 
Oppose Inclusion:
Please sign with ~~~~.
# Loom91 10:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parties 

message: Question to Greg L: exactly what purposes do you claim the notice will serve? Please give a brief summary of the points. Loom91 10:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debate 
Talk:Closed operator

message: A function is closed in the topological sense if it sends closed sets to closed sets. Is the notion of closed operator in the functional analysis sense equivalent to the notion of closed in the topological sense?
72.67.37.221 (talk) 23:53, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not. Rather, a closed operator is a special case of a function whose graph is closed. Boris Tsirelson (talk) 09:57, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Equivalent Definition?

message: Note: Unbounded operator redirects here but this page provides no information on that topic yet. —Ben FrantzDale 00:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the article is now inconsistent. The basic property number 2 makes no sense in the case of two spaces. And the phrase "one can define the spectrum and (with certain assumptions) functional calculus for such operators" in the lead became false.Boris Tsirelson (talk) 15:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Still inconsistent! Boris Tsirelson (talk) 09:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Unbounded operator
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Music Box (magazine)

message: Why delete this?  It's a great magazine.  People should know, and it's free to subscribe to. -— Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.5.22.131 (talk • contribs) 
comment: While deletion of this article may have been reasonable, it is hard to understand why all links to this site's reviews were removed from album articles on Wikipedia.  Simply because the magazine does not rate an article does not imply it is not useful as a source. -MrFizyx 21:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is also hard to see why the article in the Capital City Free Press was not given more consideration in the debate. -MrFizyx 21:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:River Trails Middle School

message: I am not so excited about the :Category:Middle schools in Illinois category, but since it exists and this one has notability claims, they just need to be attributed to a WP:RS.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  00:14, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod

message: I am working on putting together an infobox for the page. If anyone is interested in helping, just let me know.DENSSAPIENTIAE (talk) 23:20, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Brackish-water aquarium

message: Neale Monks, I think it's great to have a real expert like you writing this article. Thanks !! --Melanochromis 00:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brackish water aquarium 
Talk:Vox-ATypI classification

message: i'm in the process of porting this article over from the French version of wikipedia. Please do not delete! pablohoney 00:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial Phase

message: Someone added 'Classicals', 'Modern' and 'Calligraphics' to the article, but as far as I know, these do not belong to the VOX-ATypI classification system. None of the books I own that describe the VOX-ATypI classification have them. Please provide proper references for these additions, or the article needs to be reverted back to before they were added. Typehigh (talk) 01:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This categorization was already in the article, in a later section called "Grouping into Families". I just applied this existing information to the heading method. Ashre (talk) 00:36, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, I did check that, but must have overlooked it. Well, nevermind then. Still can't find those groups in any of the books I have though, but I guess it is in other books then. Typehigh (talk) 17:07, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References needed

message: I don't know anything about typography, but I came to this page trying to figure out what was meant by a "humanist" typeface.  It is listed twice on this page, in different categories.  The ambiguity might be worth a mention in the article.  137.71.23.54 (talk) 19:32, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understand it, the Classical Humanist fonts are serif and the Modernist Lineal Humanist fonts are sans serif. —Angr (talk) 08:27, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Realist and transitional come in for double use too, outside of this article. I'm making some edits in an attempt to clear this up.  Card Zero  (talk) 14:54, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humanist
Talk:Cayman Airways

message: The article needs citations. Segafreak2 00:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nihon Ryakki

message: See http://archive.wul.waseda.ac.jp/kosho/ru03/ru03_01361/ and the links for photos. Fg2 00:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Certainly not, if it is really a text from the 16th century. There are many much older ones. Judging from the incomplete manscript at Waseda library (which is a copy from the Meiji period) this short and certainly rather marginal text contains mainly information on Japanese geography. I doubt that it contains information on kitsune. 
I supppose that the "old text" that is said to contain something on kitsune is actually the Fusō ryakki 扶桑略記 written around 1100, fusō being an erudite homonym of Japan (Nihon). I would therefore suggest that this article should link to Fusō ryakki and, more importantly, that it should not serve as a source in the kitsune article.
--Bescheid (talk) 19:10, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: One of the most ancient records? on Kitsune?
Talk:Chuck Garvey

message: Added the sax, someone may want to talk about when he used it
--Seth slackware 21:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zheltoqsan

message: :::: The lenght of this discussion, about a secondary detail, is fascinating, but I still think that it is missing an analysis of the reasons for Kunayev's dismissal and Kolbin's choice - the article is missing some background (and honestly, it's a bit POVish). The Kremlin had its reasons for sacking the long-standing leader of the republic and sending a total outsider into the leadership of the republic (and we all have our theories about why they did it), and they should be listed. --Explendido Rocha 00:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Unless Mr. Gorbachev has a Wikipedia account, we have to settle for theories. Sourced, if possible. --Explendido Rocha 19:52, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm even a great outsider than Kolbin, so my theories don't carry much weight. But Gorbachev didn't wake up one day and say "let's send this guy Kolbin to Kazakhstan for no reason at all". The background for Kunayev's replacement is missing, as are the suggestions, made by several authors, that he was the main orchestrator of the protests. --Explendido Rocha 16:13, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: =Causes

message: It is an official view 1 or 2 people were killed, that "official view" was a standard form of lie of soviet era and still in our minds, however me as an eyewitness of that riot I would say many many people were raped and killed. it is a matter of time and a matter of political will.
If archives will open, no one could give a warranty and nazarbayev itself russians in Kazakstan could be in safety. thats why "2 people died" view will be in a "long live" position for many years, right up to a completely decolonization of Kazakstan. 
U.S. Library of Congress says 
http://countrystudies.us/kazakstan/6.htm
"at least 200 people died or were summarily executed soon after. Some accounts estimate casualties at more than 1,000" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.82.26.50 (talk) 22:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional info on events

message: I recommend to replace the “JHeltoqsan” to Jeltoqsan.
Main cause is of pure Kazak nature of this word. Useful discuss on issue here Oscar_Jet
:I disagree on this point. Generally Zh elicits a better pronunciation, as in Andizhan instead of Andijan. KazakhPol 20:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure what you mean by versions of the page... You can include the alternate transliteration of the name in the introduction - is that what you mean? If you still want to move the page to a new name, you can post a request on Wikipedia:Requested moves. KazakhPol 20:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I recommend to replace the “JHeltoqsan” to Jeltoqsan.
Talk:Rose rock

message: How is this different from Desert rose (crystal)? Starcat09 02:54, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow looks the same to me!! --HoopoeBaijiKite 17:31, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article deals specifically with barite desert roses when stained red by other minerals, and Desert rose (crystal) is about both barite and selenite with any coloration. Rose rock can be merged into it, but I think it would be better to leave them separate but linking to each other. Metaknowledge (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:24, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rose rock vs. Desert rose (crystal)

message: These rocks are unique to Oklahoma; we should probably have this article as part of the Oklahoma Wiki Project.  ProfessorPaul 00:36, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They're not unique to Oklahoma, they are also found in at least one other location on Earth, the current article states this to be Spain, but I've added a "citation needed" tag to it. But I do agree that it should be part of the Oklahoma Wiki Project as Oklahomans publicise this "fact" loads. Barry m (talk) 06:30, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Oklahoma Wiki Project

message: 4 inches is closer to 10 cm, not 20 as mentioned in the article.  How big can they actually get? 131.107.0.81 (talk) 23:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: 4 inches is the average. The largest recorded was 17 inches across and 10 inches high, weighing 125 pounds. HotshotCleaner (talk) 23:51, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I fixed the bad conversion, added conversions to the bottom section, and added a "most" to the range at the top.  I am not going to change the "average" at the bottom (even though it's unclear what that is even supposed to mean) since that's how it's worded in the source.  I hope somebody else can clean that up. 131.107.0.81 (talk) 20:22, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Size

message: I've uploaded a pic of some samples in my collection which I know are sourced from Oklahoma, hope that helps. LovelyLillith (talk) 21:38, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo