lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eswatini

message: From my understanding, the common usage name of article subject is what should be used as opposed to official or legal names. In the context of countries a recent one that has been debated the crap out of, and defeated every single time it is raised is the Czech Republic >>>> Czechia. The main reasoning is that the former is the common name despite Czechia increasingly being used as the name for the country. By this logic this article surely should be reverted back to Swaziland. Swaziland is a far more widely known name for this country than Eswatini is. It makes zero sense for this article to be renamed. UaMaol (talk) 21:42, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Here are the discussions that led it being moved: . Largoplazo (talk) 00:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Sources from after the name change overwhelmingly use  "Eswatini". Which fulfils the criteria for determining the common name.--User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 00:06, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's correct. Per WP:NAMECHANGES: "Sometimes the subject of an article will undergo a change of name. When this occurs, we give extra weight to independent, reliable English-language sources ("reliable sources") written after the name change. If the reliable sources written after the change is announced routinely use the new name, Wikipedia should follow suit and change relevant titles to match. If, on the other hand, reliable sources written after the name change is announced continue to use the established name when discussing the article topic in the present day, Wikipedia should continue to do so as well." Rreagan007 (talk) 17:16, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common usage name 

message: In English Wikipedia there is a pronunciation key here (/ˌɛswɑːˈtiːni/ ESS-wah-TEE-nee) which emphasizes the 1st and 3rd syllables. Other sources emphasize the 2nd and 4th. I have no expertise here, but I'm questioning 1st and 3rd given that the Swazi spelling capitalizes the S and I've always heard "Swaziland" with the Swa stressed. Grahamaross (talk) 23:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Kawasaki Heavy Industries C151

message: Hello everyone, I would urge regular editors to assist in maintaining this page with more stringency as it's a Good Article (compared to the other train pages). The addition of train sets number is a phenomenon which has long existed since the early days of the Wikipedia, but which is rarely sourced to reliable media. At its present state, it would fail a GA nomination, with an entire section being unsourced; I will give it two weeks before purging it.
I have also purged the train set numbers as none of them are sourced, please do continue to assist in reverting them. If the situation keeps up we might have to request for pending changes to be implemented. Seloloving (talk) 16:48, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failing GA with its present standard 

message: I have removed the entire section as it's almost completely unsourced. Please add it back if anyone can find reliable sources for this. Seloloving (talk) 02:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trainset information 

message: I do not see a clear source for the dimensions of the train cars. We have no way of knowing where/how the measurements were taken --109.146.83.213 (talk) 19:21, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimensions sources
Talk:City of Penrith

message: As per discussion at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, I have created a separate page for the City of Penrith, the Local Government Area. -- Ianblair23 12:10, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for the Local Government Area 

message: Hi, Can people who know about this LGA please have a look at this message and see if they can please help solve any of the redlinks in the "suburbs in this LGA" section of this page? (Usually solution is either to add a stub about the suburb / locality in question, or to remove it from the LGA's list). -- All the best, Nickj (t) 04:19, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for doing this! I'll cross City of Penrith off of the list of LGAs that have cruft in them. Also I completely agree with you about the unofficial neighbourhoods. -- All the best, Nickj (t) 00:21, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning suburbs in LGAs to remove redlinks
Talk:United States congressional delegations from Iowa

message: This chart shows Merwin Coad as a Republican but he was a Democrat.  See:  http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=C000540
I don't know how to edit the page to show this, but it should be corrected.
::Facts verified. U.S. Congress Biographical Directory In fact, the change has already been made. ~ Ross (ElCharismo) 14:21, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errata 

message: According to the U.S. Congress Biographical DirectoryWilliam Penn Wolf(f) has only one f to his surname. Lewis Trondheim 13:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Errata 
Talk:Corannulene

message: The drawing shows that 2 of the carbon atoms have 5 bonds. Now unless the chemistry of carbon has changed in the last 25 years this is impossible. I will try to create a correct drawing and upload it. Dr. Morbius (talk) 20:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I corrected and uploaded the drawing. Dr. Morbius (talk) 20:35, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The drawing for tetrabromocorranulene is wrong
Talk:Pipestone National Monument

message: I found this landmark listed under "Cannomok'e--Pipestone National Monument" in the National Register. I searched for "Cannomok'e" on the web, and found no hits except for National Register related references. Does anyone know the story behind it? — Eoghanacht talk 19:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cannomok'e? 

message: Hello,
I am a current park ranger at Pipestone National Monument and it has come to my attention that the Wikipedia page for this park contains inaccurate information. In the third paragraph of this article, I suggest replacing the sentence:
"Today only Indigenous people from 23 tribal nations, with treaties with the National Park Service, are allowed to quarry the pipestone."
with the following information:
"Any enrolled member of a federally recognized American Indian tribe may apply for a free quarry permit to dig for the pipestone. The National Park Service regularly consults with representatives from 23 affiliated tribal nations to discuss land management practices, historic preservation, exhibit design, and other facets of the park's management."
https://www.nps.gov/pipe/learn/management/quarry-permits.htm
https://www.nps.gov/pipe/learn/historyculture/affiliated-tribal-nations.htm
165.83.160.249 (talk) 22:10, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate Information - Paragraph 3 

message: This paragraph seems out of place in this article. The Crow Creek Reservation is in central South Dakota. The only referenced source for this paragraph (a self-published blog) makes no mention of the Pipestone quarry in the text; it only appears on a map as a point along the route of the wagon train. That's not a significant enough connection to warrant inclusion in this article. Does anyone object to the removal of this paragraph? Skimpburger (talk) 00:06, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore, the WP article on the Crow Creek Reservation makes no mention of the story related in this paragraph. If it belongs anywhere, it belongs in that article and not this one. Skimpburger (talk) 00:26, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You should go ahead and move it to the correct article.  oncamera  (talk page) 02:15, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crow Creek Reservation paragraph
Talk:Harvey Weinstein

message: In the section 2005-2017, "An analysis of Academy Award acceptance speeches from 1966 to 2016 found that Weinstein had been thanked or praised in 34 speeches—as many times as God, and second only to Steven Spielberg (with 43 mentions).", I feel like "-as many times as God," is unneeded and doesn't serve the neutral tone of Wikipedia. Do the rest of you agree? MLC 30975 (talk) 15:35, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.249.41.163 (talk) 22:27, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Agree. It should read "an American former film producer." 196.2.13.245 (talk) 08:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Of course we agree. What does any god have to do with this? 37.47.130.239 (talk) 06:03, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

text: How could that not be relevant! 2604:3D08:5B80:B70:6BED:C571:6029:3D8A (talk) 00:45, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary Language  

message: :Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biography]] has an [[WP:RFC|RfC]]

message: Any idea why the famous Courtney Love quote is not included here? It showcases how pervasive the knowledge of Weinstein's abuses where in 2005 well before he was indicted. Here's some RS: CNN, Slate, CBS, Billboard, and People.
2601:19E:427E:5BB0:BC4B:EDD7:9F02:52C9 (talk) 22:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Courtney Love quote
Talk:Randwick, New South Wales

message: As per discussion at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, I have created a separate page for the City of Randwick, the Local Government Area. -- Ianblair23 12:33, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for the Local Government Area 

message: Expanded the history and started re-arranging the photos, but must admit I've had problems. Can't make the shots all go exactly where I want them, so put them all back on right side of page, but still not satisfied. Will try again tomorrow. Need a break right now, and there are still eleven more shots I want to add.
Sardaka 10:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: Got it right this time. The trick is to put the shots in a gallery, which seems to be the only way to make them stay where you put them. All finished now.
Sardaka 09:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prayers Answered

message: I'm not sure the Capt Cook statue in front of Balzac is the best picture to have as the main article picture. There are lots of other great shots that coule be taken of the area. I think I will take some pictures and try to upload them, and possibly try running with a different picture for the main spot for a bit - perhaps one of the Town Hall.
I think it would also be nice to show more of the architecture of the suburb in pictures here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.240.141.63 (talk) 14:47, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main article picture and other article pictures 

message: I have noticed that nearly all of the 24 images in this article are also available on commons. I also notice that there is a commons link at the bottom of this article. If that is the case then why are the images here and on commons as well. I have placed the clean up tag for galleries in the appropriate section. I wont be working on this article to soon. I will leave that to the authors and neutral editors to look at first. Thankyou. P.o.o.r.P.h.o.t.o.r.e.m.o.v.i.l.s.t.  (talk) 11:35, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:City of Rockdale

message: As per discussion at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, I have created a separate page for the City of Rockdale, the Local Government Area. -- Ianblair23 12:46, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for the Local Government Area 

message: This page has had its infobox updated to Infobox Australian Place. This update has been automatically preformed by TheJoshBot. Please be aware that poorly filled templates can have infomation lost in the transition that is unknown to the bot. Check the page history for more infomation. The following infomation has been lost in the transition, and will need to be converted to the document prose: 
Field Name            	Field Value
council               	Rockdale City Council
ausborn               	52.3
atsi                  	0.5
statistical_local_area	6650
I found the entry confusing and ambiguous. It is necessary to distinguish between the local government area governed by the Council-the City (or, earlier, Municipality) of Rockdale-and the principal suburb after which it has been named. I know it is a difficulty. I have tried to make it clearer by retaining the original text and adding distinguishing words. Phayla 6 May 2007
Restored entry to original format as much as possible. Please check (copied old version so it should be identical). Am working on a different presentation of the history. Will reveal it when I am ready. Phayla 8 May 2007.
:I restored the history information. This is useful information and belongs on this page. If you want to create a separate 'History of the City Of Rockdale' that's fine but we also need more information here. Ideally, I would like to see something similar to the Sutherland Shire page. J Bar 00:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Send a message to the wiki editor who transferred the data. Their details would appear in the history tab. J Bar 00:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Update

message: Formal request has been received to merge the article History of the City of Rockdale into City of Rockdale. Both articles talk about the same thing, as the Council no longer exists. The "History of the City of Rockdale" page is very poor quality and barely referenced, all the information there can easily be covered in the "City of Rockdale" page. Pinging proposer  Discuss here. Richard3120 (talk) 13:53, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:David Cooper (psychiatrist)

message: A single edit to this article added a death date of 1986. I can't find any evidence via Google that he has died. Removed. Cite, please? -- The Anome 13:45, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A case could be made that Dr. Cooper was the only member of the anti-psychiatry movement, insofar as it was a movement at all. Laing eschewed the term; Szasz & Foucault were critical of psychiatry years before Cooper coined the term.
A case could also be made that an anti-psychiatry bias began in the wake of WWII: soldiers were returning from overseas with a plethora of emotional disturbances, even while (in the USA, anyway) doctors had made a concerted effort at the intake (draft induction) level to "weed out" the incipiently disturbed.
In any case, it's a vague generalization to lump Szasz et al. into the anti-psychiatry movement: that's the job of pop media. BubbleDine (talk) 13:34, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-Psychiatry Movement
Talk:British Fascists

message: It seems fair enough to merge the two. Although they were two different stages of the movement the line of development was continuous. I would suggest, however, retaining this article as the main one and merging British Fascisti into it, whilst retaining it as a redirect. Keresaspa 13:17, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I would strongly dispute the allegation that the British Union of Fascists "National affiliation" was with the Conservative party. Certainly they campaigned for the Conservatives, as they were realist enough to know that the choice was between a Conservative government or a "socialist" Labour one. That does not make then affiliated to the Labour party. That is like saying that the Communists were affiliated to the Labour Party.Royalcourtier (talk) 07:49, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  National affiliation
Talk:Waverley, New South Wales

message: As per discussion at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, I have created a separate page for Waverley Council, the Local Government Area. -- Ianblair23 13:22, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for the Local Government Area 

message: Have restored names of Birrell and Victoria Streets, which someone had deleted. I think it's logical to have them there, under the shots of the churches.
Sardaka 09:36, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Streets

message: Removed the following text from page:
“Barney Wilson, a resident of Waverley and Graduate of Waverley College, who had recently turned 18.“
Note this reference links the Waverley resident to a famous basketballer 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barney_Wilson 59.100.159.162 (talk) 10:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of reference under “notable resident” born in Chattanooga TN (not Waverley NSW)
Talk:Waverley Council

message: As per discussion at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, I have created a separate page for Waverley Council, the Local Government Area. -- Ianblair23 13:24, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for the Local Government Area 

message: Vaucluse is not listed - it is partially in the Waverley boundary, like Rose Bay. Perhaps they should have "(partial)" after their name. "Bondi North" is incorrect. The suburb is called North Bondi.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barcs265 (talk • contribs) 09:50, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Suburbs need updating

message: These are referred to but never properly defined.
MarmotteiNoZ 03:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to define the four current wards
Talk:George Szekeres

message: I apologise for being a bit insensitive here, but I'm unaware of any long illness that George was suffering from; I have removed that sentence until someone can back it up a little bit. George was still in his office at UNSW several days a week as late as 2002 — remarkable for someone in his mid-90s. George and Esther moved to Adelaide in mid 2004; I had thought the reason was Esther's poor health rather than George's. Dmharvey  Talk 13:25, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  A long illness? 

message: Shouldn't it be noted that George and Esther both died within hours of each other, as noted in Esther's page?
: It already says that. Dmharvey 23:35, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death with wife?
Talk:Woollahra

message: This page was moved from "Woollahra" to "Woollahra, New South Wales" as per the naming convention set out at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (places) – Ianblair23 13:38, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: As per discussion at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, I have created a separate page for the Municipality of Woollahra, the Local Government Area. -- Ianblair23 13:46, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for the Local Government Area
Talk:Municipality of Woollahra

message: As per discussion at Talk:List of Sydney suburbs, I have created a separate page for the Municipality of Woollahra, the Local Government Area. -- Ianblair23 13:45, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for the Local Government Area 

message: *Information to be updated: The new Mayor of Woollahra Municipal Council is Cr Susan Wynne. The new Deputy Mayor is Cr Richard Shields. Please update all references to the former mayor and deputy mayor in this article.
*Explanation of issue: New mayor and deputy mayor elected in September 2019
*References supporting change: https://www.woollahra.nsw.gov.au/news/articles/mayoral_election_2019
Woollahra Council 1 (talk) 00:51, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Some proposed changes

message: Spintendo  01:27, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 31-OCT-2019

message: *Information to be updated: Update the Notes column of the Ward table under "Current composition and election method". The new Mayor is Susan Wynne. The new Deputy Mayor is Richard Shields.
*Explanation of issue: New mayor and deputy mayor elected in September 2019
*References supporting change: https://www.woollahra.nsw.gov.au/news/articles/mayoral_election_2019
Woollahra Council 1 (talk) 03:08, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note that future edit request directions which state each and every instance of where the change is to be made would render the edit request process as more efficient than blanket requests to "update all references" would. Regards,  Spintendo  05:43, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Some proposed changes
Category talk:Nuclear bombs of the United States

message: Originally this article said Modern American nuclear bombs were built after 1900. As the first nuclear bomb was made in 1945 this seemed a bit ridiculous. I changed the date to 1960 as that date satisfied the current category members. --BeenBeren 13:47, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I modified this to "still in active service as of 2006", as the List of nuclear weapons now gives a date range for most US weapons and is approaching a complete list.  Georgewilliamherbert 08:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Most of these are not "bombs", per se. Perhaps we can rename this to "Modern American nuclear weapons"? --Fastfission 17:45, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Read the archives

message: While this suggestion makes a lot of sense, I'm afraid that saying it won't make people do it. Several talk pages have hundreds of kilobytes of archive, and people simply aren't going to read through them before making the point they wish to make. That's one of the reasons why the village pump has a "perennial proposals" section. Bottom line - if there's anything relevant in the archives, provide a diff or a link. Radiant_>|< 13:51, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
:From a practical, pragmatic standpoint, your concern rings true. But I don't see how reminding them they have that responsibility can hurt. The convention at the better run, heavily-used discussion forums and usenet groups is that new arrivals need to educate and familiar themselves with the state of the current debate if they are to participate, and especially if they want be taken seriously early on. It's not the responsibility of the longer-term editors to educate every new user who thinks they've got the killer new argument, which usually proves in the end to be something seen many times before (and just copied from some other website). If it were the regular's responsibility to educate each new arrival, no progress would ever be made as the same issues will be repeated re-hashed again and again until the newbie understands (or gives up), which is something we're already seeing at some articles and that needs to be addressed. You're also right about the daunting size of some archives discouraging new editors from reading them. This is why I included the suggestion that it's up to long-term editors to cull from the a FAQ to point new users to; I feel that's more than meeting the newbies half way, and if they can't be bothered to do that, then they have no basis for complaints, right? FeloniousMonk 19:31, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: As a long time usenet user from the days before AOL I can tell you the usenet FAQs were vital for keeping boards from discussing the same thing over and over and over.  Archive talk pages really aren't that long for almost every article and for those it is, a FAQ would be fine.  jbolden1517Talk 00:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  support
Talk:Omri Sharon

message: Glancing through the history, I think I understand why the NPOV tag was added. Would be nice to have an explanation though. -- 169.237.30.225 13:52, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Hebrew wikipedia article says Omri's DOB is 19th August, not 8th August. Any verification of one or the other? jnothman talk 00:06, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 
Talk:Sequestration

message: Whilst the stuff from the 1911 Britannica is good as a public domain document, it needs expanding and updating. Davidkinnen 13:52, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Expansion

message: what the funk is "ir-active"?? 193.166.138.68 (talk) 06:52, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Clarification