lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Mishnah rabbis

message: Note: Many articles about the rabbis of the Talmud and Mishnah are derived from the archaic Jewish Encyclopedia, published between 1901-1906, over one hundred years ago (when the Middle East was still under the thumb of the Ottoman Turks) and which used the archaic expressions "Palestine" when referring to the Land of Israel, and to the Jews living in the areas of the historical Land of Israel as "Palestinians." This is a big mistake that requires constant attention and correction, especially when copying and editing articles from the Jewish Encyclopedia or from similarly archaic sources such as Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897). At this time, no-one uses the term/s "Palestinian/s" (in relation to anything associated with Jews or the land they lived in and which they regarded as their homeland) nor by any type of conventional Jewish scholarship, particularly at the present time when the label "Palestinian" is almost entirely identified with the Palestinian Arabs who are mostly Muslims. Finally, kindly take note that the name Palestinian Talmud is also not used and it redirects to the conventional term Jerusalem Talmud used in Jewish scholarship. Thank you. IZAK 13:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis to avoid confusion

message: Makes sense, I'll try to remember.  However, there was a period when everyone referred to the land of Israel as Palestine.  Therefore, to say something like "in 1940 Shlomo Pines emigrated to Israel" would appear to be an anachronism.  Don't we have to use the term "Palestine" during a certain period for historical accuracy?  What is this period?  From Roman conquest until 1948?  Thanks.  Dfass 15:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis 

message: I propose we rename this category to Tannaim. Very neat and simple. Please discuss. frummer 11:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename
Category talk:Talmud rabbis of Syria Palaestina

message: Note: Many articles about the rabbis of the Talmud and Mishnah are derived from the archaic Jewish Encyclopedia, published between 1901-1906, over one hundred years ago (when the Middle East was still under the thumb of the Ottoman Turks) and which used the archaic expressions "Palestine" when referring to the Land of Israel, and to the Jews living in the areas of the historical Land of Israel as "Palestinians." This is a big mistake that requires constant attention and correction, especially when copying and editing articles from the Jewish Encyclopedia or from similarly archaic sources such as Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897). At this time, no-one uses the term/s "Palestinian/s" (in relation to anything associated with Jews or the land they lived in and which they regarded as their homeland) nor by any type of conventional Jewish scholarship, particularly at the present time when the label "Palestinian" is almost entirely identified with the Palestinian Arabs who are mostly Muslims. Finally, kindly take note that the name Palestinian Talmud is also not used and it redirects to the conventional term Jerusalem Talmud used in Jewish scholarship. Thank you. IZAK 13:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis to avoid confusion

message: Makes sense, I'll try to remember.  However, there was a period when everyone referred to the land of Israel as Palestine.  Therefore, to say something like "in 1940 Shlomo Pines emigrated to Israel" would appear to be an anachronism.  Don't we have to use the term "Palestine" during a certain period for historical accuracy?  What is this period?  From Roman conquest until 1948?  Thanks.  Dfass 15:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis
Category talk:Talmud rabbis

message: Note: Many articles about the rabbis of the Talmud and Mishnah are derived from the archaic Jewish Encyclopedia, published between 1901-1906, over one hundred years ago (when the Middle East was still under the thumb of the Ottoman Turks) and which used the archaic expressions "Palestine" when referring to the Land of Israel, and to the Jews living in the areas of the historical Land of Israel as "Palestinians." This is a big mistake that requires constant attention and correction, especially when copying and editing articles from the Jewish Encyclopedia or from similarly archaic sources such as Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897). At this time, no-one uses the term/s "Palestinian/s" (in relation to anything associated with Jews or the land they lived in and which they regarded as their homeland) nor by any type of conventional Jewish scholarship, particularly at the present time when the label "Palestinian" is almost entirely identified with the Palestinian Arabs who are mostly Muslims. Finally, kindly take note that the name Palestinian Talmud is also not used and it redirects to the conventional term Jerusalem Talmud used in Jewish scholarship. Thank you. IZAK 13:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis to avoid confusion

message: Makes sense, I'll try to remember.  However, there was a period when everyone referred to the land of Israel as Palestine.  Therefore, to say something like "in 1940 Shlomo Pines emigrated to Israel" would appear to be an anachronism.  Don't we have to use the term "Palestine" during a certain period for historical accuracy?  What is this period?  From Roman conquest until 1948?  Thanks.  Dfass 15:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis
Category talk:Talmud rabbis of Babylonia

message: Note: Many articles about the rabbis of the Talmud and Mishnah are derived from the archaic Jewish Encyclopedia, published between 1901-1906, over one hundred years ago (when the Middle East was still under the thumb of the Ottoman Turks) and which used the archaic expressions "Palestine" when referring to the Land of Israel, and to the Jews living in the areas of the historical Land of Israel as "Palestinians." This is a big mistake that requires constant attention and correction, especially when copying and editing articles from the Jewish Encyclopedia or from similarly archaic sources such as Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897). At this time, no-one uses the term/s "Palestinian/s" (in relation to anything associated with Jews or the land they lived in and which they regarded as their homeland) nor by any type of conventional Jewish scholarship, particularly at the present time when the label "Palestinian" is almost entirely identified with the Palestinian Arabs who are mostly Muslims. Finally, kindly take note that the name Palestinian Talmud is also not used and it redirects to the conventional term Jerusalem Talmud used in Jewish scholarship. Thank you. IZAK 13:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis to avoid confusion

message: Makes sense, I'll try to remember.  However, there was a period when everyone referred to the land of Israel as Palestine.  Therefore, to say something like "in 1940 Shlomo Pines emigrated to Israel" would appear to be an anachronism.  Don't we have to use the term "Palestine" during a certain period for historical accuracy?  What is this period?  From Roman conquest until 1948?  Thanks.  Dfass 15:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis
Category talk:Talmud people

message: Note: Many articles about the rabbis of the Talmud and Mishnah are derived from the archaic Jewish Encyclopedia, published between 1901-1906, over one hundred years ago (when the Middle East was still under the thumb of the Ottoman Turks) and which used the archaic expressions "Palestine" when referring to the Land of Israel, and to the Jews living in the areas of the historical Land of Israel as "Palestinians." This is a big mistake that requires constant attention and correction, especially when copying and editing articles from the Jewish Encyclopedia or from similarly archaic sources such as Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897). At this time, no-one uses the term/s "Palestinian/s" (in relation to anything associated with Jews or the land they lived in and which they regarded as their homeland) nor by any type of conventional Jewish scholarship, particularly at the present time when the label "Palestinian" is almost entirely identified with the Palestinian Arabs who are mostly Muslims. Finally, kindly take note that the name Palestinian Talmud is also not used and it redirects to the conventional term Jerusalem Talmud used in Jewish scholarship. Thank you. IZAK 13:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis to avoid confusion

message: Makes sense, I'll try to remember.  However, there was a period when everyone referred to the land of Israel as Palestine.  Therefore, to say something like "in 1940 Shlomo Pines emigrated to Israel" would appear to be an anachronism.  Don't we have to use the term "Palestine" during a certain period for historical accuracy?  What is this period?  From Roman conquest until 1948?  Thanks.  Dfass 15:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis
Category talk:Roman-era Jews

message: Note: Many articles about the rabbis of the Talmud and Mishnah are derived from the archaic Jewish Encyclopedia, published between 1901-1906, over one hundred years ago (when the Middle East was still under the thumb of the Ottoman Turks) and which used the archaic expressions "Palestine" when referring to the Land of Israel, and to the Jews living in the areas of the historical Land of Israel as "Palestinians." This is a big mistake that requires constant attention and correction, especially when copying and editing articles from the Jewish Encyclopedia or from similarly archaic sources such as Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897). At this time, no-one uses the term/s "Palestinian/s" (in relation to anything associated with Jews or the land they lived in and which they regarded as their homeland) nor by any type of conventional Jewish scholarship, particularly at the present time when the label "Palestinian" is almost entirely identified with the Palestinian Arabs who are mostly Muslims. Finally, kindly take note that the name Palestinian Talmud is also not used and it redirects to the conventional term Jerusalem Talmud used in Jewish scholarship. Thank you. IZAK 13:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis to avoid confusion

message: Makes sense, I'll try to remember.  However, there was a period when everyone referred to the land of Israel as Palestine.  Therefore, to say something like "in 1940 Shlomo Pines emigrated to Israel" would appear to be an anachronism.  Don't we have to use the term "Palestine" during a certain period for historical accuracy?  What is this period?  From Roman conquest until 1948?  Thanks.  Dfass 15:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis
Category talk:Talmud

message: Note: Many articles about the rabbis of the Talmud and Mishnah are derived from the archaic Jewish Encyclopedia, published between 1901-1906, over one hundred years ago (when the Middle East was still under the thumb of the Ottoman Turks) and which used the archaic expressions "Palestine" when referring to the Land of Israel, and to the Jews living in the areas of the historical Land of Israel as "Palestinians." This is a big mistake that requires constant attention and correction, especially when copying and editing articles from the Jewish Encyclopedia or from similarly archaic sources such as Easton's Bible Dictionary (1897). At this time, no-one uses the term/s "Palestinian/s" (in relation to anything associated with Jews or the land they lived in and which they regarded as their homeland) nor by any type of conventional Jewish scholarship, particularly at the present time when the label "Palestinian" is almost entirely identified with the Palestinian Arabs who are mostly Muslims. Finally, kindly take note that the name Palestinian Talmud is also not used and it redirects to the conventional term Jerusalem Talmud used in Jewish scholarship. Thank you. IZAK 13:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis to avoid confusion

message: Makes sense, I'll try to remember.  However, there was a period when everyone referred to the land of Israel as Palestine.  Therefore, to say something like "in 1940 Shlomo Pines emigrated to Israel" would appear to be an anachronism.  Don't we have to use the term "Palestine" during a certain period for historical accuracy?  What is this period?  From Roman conquest until 1948?  Thanks.  Dfass 15:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not using "Palestine" or "Palestinian" for Talmud and rabbis 

message: I am reposting the following request from User  on my user talk page for wider notification:
:I was thinking of trying to stimulate development of a series of articles on Gemara concepts and doctrines, maybe to help children or newcomers to Gemara with explanations of some fundamental concepts that recur throughout the Gemara. Some examples might be articles on Yiush, Chazakah, Ta'aninun (as in "Ta'aninun L'Yoresh"), Eidim Zomemin (forgive my awful transliterations), Migu, etc., etc. Maybe we could even create a category or subcategory for it. I created Breira in this vein. As I don't have the experience or expertise in Wikipedia to know what to do to best develop this idea, I figured I'd come to you for your opinions on: (1) whether it's a good idea; and (2) How to best go about implementing it. Thanks Sh76us (talk) 15:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idea for Talmud articles
Talk:Jack Tafari

message: 200px|thumb|
I want to use this photo on the Jack Tafari page, but I have no idea how to resize it. Can someone help me, please? 07:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Thanks for those comments. We have kept within the guidelines, and the subject of the article is aware of the article, and supports it. We will add him to bios of living persons. As always,  appreciate your help, Bubba. 00:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks
Talk:11:11 (numerology)

message: The Georgia Guidstones , Maintain Humanity Under Five Hundred Million In Perpetual Balance With Nature.
The One Percent Would Include The Other Four Percent, Making FIVE PERCENT Of The Human Race, Maintained In Perpetual Balance With Nature  ( Five Hundred Million )  Minus The 95% Which R.C. Christian Predicted, Depopulated In The Near Future, And
In Accordance With The NWO's First Commandment.
11 11  2+2 Equals 4 Or According To Georgia Orwell's Book 1984 2+2 Equals ( 5 )  , Twenty Twenty Vision Could Conspiratorially Also Be 2020 For Those That Are AWAKE ,.....Possibly!? TASHDIG (talk) 13:58, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  11 11 Numerology 

message: I see this time in some days 86.97.236.179 (talk) 12:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  11:11
Talk:Jack Speiden

message: Contrary to the user above, I'm not sure what the point of this article is. Yes, this man had an interesting life, but that doesn't make him notable enough to have a wikipedia article on him. At the very least, this article requires a major rewrite- it is far too chatty, informal and it attempts more at entertainment than information. There needs to be a real review of this article's status. Bosola 12:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevant?

message: This article has major issues. Sounds like it was written by someone who knew Speiden personally. Also, the writing style is also incorrect. They use "Jack" over "Speiden" in some sentences. 
Needs more citations, otherwise, I would recommend it for deletion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexf505 (talk • contribs) 05:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  The "Jack" issues have been addressed. This individual has a featured obit in the NYT, ties to the Kennedy family and Barry Goldwater, and was a congressional candidate. He owned of a ranch that Arizona DOT considers significant enough to note with an I-10 exit sign. So Notability is not an issue here. That tag has been removed. Gulbenk  (talk) 17:09, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and Content Issues
Talk:Gideon Haigh

message: Wiktionary tells me that perennate is a verb used in botanical contexts, meaning "to survive from one growing season to the next".
So, what is meant by "... and The Vincibles, his story of the South Yarra Cricket Club, of which he is life member and perennate vice-president ..."?  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 05:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Perennate?
Talk:Socialist Party of Oregon

message: I tried to remove the website from the code in the box but seemed to have failed in remembering how it was to be done. When someone else can doubloe check it please ave it removed to keep it up to date.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.122.29.109 (talk) 01:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website no long working 

message: 172.195.242.111 09:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Socialist Party of Oregon 

message: The recurring efforts of the Pacific Green Party to highjack the article are making a mess of it. First, the group created by the Browns and Bushman is neither related to the Socialist Party of Oregon (committee ID 1970 in Oregon) nor to the SPUSA (there is no SPUSA chapter any longer in Oregon).
Because of the time during which the SPUSA chapter and political party were run as of they were one organization, it would be good to mention that history -- the former affiliation to the SPUSA is the reason why the SPUSA logo appears, it is historical.
It is regrettable to see that Wikipedia still holds fast to such low standards.
-Maxim Var  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.190.20.62 (talk) 08:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is much messed up 

message: The bogus history is erroneous. The Greens modifying the page have not paid attention.
In/about 1998, the SPO lost statewide ballot access, but retained ballot access in Congressional Districts 2-5.
From 2000 to about 2004, Congressional Districts 2, 4, and 5 were lost.
In 2008, District 3 was lost.
What documentation will serve to demonstrate this? In 2000, for example, Brown ran for CD3 and Duemler ran for CD4.
httpL//www.thesocialistparty.org/spo/archive/history/2000.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.190.180.13 (talk) 08:16, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History inaccurate 

message: A quick note that I have added to the reading list a document which I produced back in 2004 (a transcription of 1904 newspaper articles) which I just bumped into again on Archive.org. I can't imagine why anyone would object, it being completely in context, non-commercial, etc., but I mention the fact for the record. —Tim Davenport /// Carrite (talk) 17:30, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Pro forma COI notice

message: Does the 1992 party still exist? It's website can only be found in archives, it doesn't seem to have a Facebook page (except this which appears to be about a movement to reorganize the Oregon branch of the Socialist Party USA) and can't find any recent information about it. Charles Essie (talk) 22:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 1992 reorganization
Talk:Ling Bouvier

message: Geez, does this page really need to be totally locked down!?  I understand that Ling isn't very notable, but the page lock is preventing me from fixing a problem.  This article redirects to Patty and Selma, which in turn redirects to Patty and Selma Bouvier.  That's a double redirect, but I can't fix it.  So someone needs to fix it.  --Brandon Dilbeck 07:30, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Double redirect

message: I'm trying to redirect the page here:    Bouvier family#Ling Bouvier
Thanks! Scorpion 21:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've actually just gone ahead and unprotected the page -- it's been quite some time, so I'm hoping it's no longer necessary. Redirect to your heart's content. :) Luna Santin 00:30, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits needed
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Vintila Barbu

message: I would be a lot more comfortable if Vintila would say straight out, "No, I have not taken material verbatim from anywhere except where I have explicitly given credit." But he has not said that on the various talk pages. Instead, we have had "non-denial denials": "how odd you would think that", etc. That is much of why I brought this to an RFC. - Jmabel | Talk 07:31, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand why you say that this looks like plagiarism. However, that is a serious accusation and I would be a lot more comfortable if you could point to an article, or a paragraph, or even a sentence, and show a source that it had been copied from. (I tried to find one myself, comparing the passages you referred to in the Pitesti Prison articles to the Bacu reference used to suppor them). Without that, it is hard to make a case. - Eron Talk 14:29, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

text: We now have an explicit denial of plagiarism, rather than just a "non-denial denial". I'm ready to assume good faith, but suspect Dahn is not, and certainly Vintila at this point considers himself to have a grievance against Dahn. I think it would be a good idea for the two of them to request mediation. - Jmabel | Talk 03:23, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I would really like to see this answered

message: I will no longer be active in most of Wikipedia (not a complete departure, but certainly not participating in RFCs for the foreseeable future unless one is started about me). So if there is further sorting out here, it will have to be without me. - Jmabel | Talk 18:58, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I will no longer be active
Talk:Kenneth Lee Pike

message: In 1935, the SIL courses were not at the Univ. of Oklahoma but at Sulphur Springs, Arkansas. I took OU out of this paragraph.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.145.81.2 (talk) 18:55, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: SIL and University of Oklahoma

message: The following quote was removed. It's meaning is not immediately apparent and does not strike an "encyclopedic" tone unless the implications of Pike's meaning are clearly apparent. Mules and horses both do work, so if he's saying he was hard working, then that is readily apparent from his accomplishments. Removed: "
When asked whether he was a missionary or a linguist, he replied "I am a mule."  He explained that a mule is part horse, part donkey, combining traits of each.  He pointed out that sometimes he did more of the work of a horse, other times he did more of the work of a donkey, but he was always both." Morskyjezek (talk) 13:15, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Missionary and Language work

message: Not mentioned in article. Equinox ◑ 19:10, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "motifeme" redirect here? 
Talk:Victory Sports One

message: this article should really be moved to Victory Sports One as that was the full official title of the network. Ehren 07:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming