lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ethernet over SDH

message: I don't know much about the ENet side of things, but I know that SDH and Sonet are only a few bits off... — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 03:06, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Especially from the higher level perspective of EoS, they perform identically.  They definitely should be merged... whichever one survives (or maybe the combined article could be called Ethernet over SONET/SDH) could use "EoS" in the text so people could read in their mind it as either Ethernet over SDH or Ethernet over SONET. Mrand 03:15, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just stumbled on the two pages when I was trying to find what else linked to the horrible mis-spelling of Sychronous Digital Heirarchy. ;) — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 03:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: There is also Ethernet over Transport (EoT), a generic term, and Ethernet over PDH (EoP or EoPDH), the same set of protocols but run over PDH servers. BertK 06:49, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  EoT and EoPDH 

message: I know something about SDH technology and I think that have some errors in the Payload Capacity column... One STM-1 supports up to 63 E1's, but the table indicates 1 to 64 vc-12. In the same way, one STM-1 supports 3 vc-3, thus one STM-64 supports 192 vc-3, not 256. 
I don't know much about SONET, but I think the capacities are the same of SDH...
Sidneytodo (talk) 21:37, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, capacities are the same for SONET and SDH.  I am not a expert on low-order, but I don't remember there being a restriction that a VirtCat group must fit within an STM-1.  The number 64 comes from the low-order sequence numbers being stored in a 6-bit field.  Those 64 E1's can be spread across any number of STM-1's.  Same for high order.  The 256 limitation comes from an 8-bit sequence number field.  Those 256's can be spread across multiple OC-192/STM-64 pipes.  —Mrand Talk • C 03:49, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The bandwidths table is correct?
Talk:Patrick Bateman

message: Novel kind of "reveals" his birth date quite vaguely as "mid october" or so (Libra), no idea why or on what base here is stated 19th September 1960 as a fact. --2001:A61:40A:8A01:A0A2:D432:36A:F48B (talk) 21:44, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date ? 

message: Sigma male????
Is this information really necessary?
also human is uncapitalized Nilederg (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species: Human? 

message: I think it would be good to make a reference of how he actually owns the sigma comunnity SamarkandHFK (talk) 09:25, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sigma male
Template talk:Life in the United States

message: Since someone created this template for a purpose, then that someone should write the purpose here and where they think the template should be used.  In articles?  In categories?  Which ones?   Thanks Hmains 03:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't create the template but have written some of the articles on it. The template should be posted on all the articles listed in the template as well as the US article. Signaturebrendel 05:18, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The category was not created at the same time as the template. I created the category when I started adding articles to the template but it was deleted a couple of days as some editors thought of it as being to broad. Regards, Signaturebrendel 03:53, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Such an article is a good idea but would be tremendous undertaking covering a huge subject. I guess each section would have a link to the article relating to it-perhaps the article would have one section for each subject on the template...hmm... I'll think about it... Signaturebrendel 03:31, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: I personally like the horizontal style templates more, those are also easier to place in articles. So I made the following version, what do you think?
----
----
---Majestic- 23:43, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I like it! Using the Life template got difficult in my Educational attainment in the United States article. So, I say go ahead and implement the changes! One question though-Is there any way to increase the font size of the articles listed? Regards, Signaturebrendel 00:49, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion for a new version 

message: It has been suggested that this  or section be merged into Template:United States topics.
It seems like this template has a lot of overlap with Template:United States topics, which is more comprehensive.  I would like to have only one of these on the United States article, so I was thinking the easiest thing might be to simply merge them.  This template includes many articles from different categories on the "US topics" list.  We could either give each category its own navbox, or put the whole US topics box on each of the articles it references. -- Beland 23:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Rebate plane

message: The first sentence indicates the Rebate plane is used for cutting rabbets. However, the rest of the article refers to these cuts at rebates.
I believe rabbet is the correct term, though I acknowledge rebate is more often used in England and other English speaking countries.
Oxford Living Dictionary (https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/rebate) indicates the origin of rebate as:
Late 17th century: alteration of rabbet.
Saibot942 (talk) 18:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I appreciate your effort but it seems that someone reverted your changes without explanation, or maybe I don't understand what you intended. In the USA, the word "rabbet" is used exclusively, as far as I know. The biggest issue is that the article is incorrect. "The rebate plane is one of a group of planes, including the shoulder plane, bullnose plane and carriage makers plane, in which the blade protrudes by a very small amount - usually less than half a millimetre - from the sides of the plane body on both sides. The blade is very slightly wider than the body of the plane." The illustrations belie this. How can the plane have a fence if the blade is wider than the body? How can it cut a side groove in a piece of wood? The blade is much narrower than the body. The blade cuts a side groove, determined by the fence, to a variable depth, as shown by the illustration of a rabbet. (I have one here that my grandfather used. It is similar to the one in the first illustration.) Wastrel Way (talk) Eric  —Preceding undated comment added 03:54, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent use of rabbet vs. rebate
Talk:Bad Hare Day

message: *THe book actually sounds better than the TV adoption!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.53.145.46 (talk) 12:30, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Book and TV Adoption
File talk:Eukaryoticcell.png

message: This plant cell does not have a clearly visible cell wall. In fact it looks like an animal cell with chloroplasts inserted.
A plant cell usually has a more rigid shape than a animal cell. This rounded shape is unusual. Also, there is no central vacuole shown.
Plants keep their shape because water flows into the central vacuole pushing the cytoplasm out to the sides. This image is misleading in that it is nowhere near typical. This should not be the lead image for the cell article.
Rozzychan 03:54, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: An animal cell with chloroplasts added
Talk:Red River Bridge War

message: There are one or two ambiguous references to just "bridge" in this article.  I had to think about some of them for a bit in context and one gave me pause.  Especially troublesome was when it appeared both ends of a bridge were being closed.  Anyway suggest each instance of  bridge have free or toll in front of it.  I'm not sure I could add them correctly just from context.--J Clear 03:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: The 'American Conflicts' template doesn't really seem appropriate, especially since the United States military was never involved. Narthring (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template 

message: What is going on with this?  It's the entire focus of a book from a university press.  It has an encyclopedia article in a scholarly encyclopedia.  And both of these resources already appear in the article.  The idea that this might not be notable is ludicrous.  49.198.51.54 (talk) 20:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability tag 

message: This page is really messy. I don't know why but the info box claimed a “Decisive Oklahoma victory” and also said “toll bridge destroyed” nether of those claims were true. Was this vandalism? LuxembourgLover (talk) 17:40, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information
Talk:M-50 (Michigan highway)

message: What is the exact eastern terminus for M-50?  The article says that it ends at US-24 (North Telegraph Road) in Monroe, Michigan, but other sources indicate that it stretches two more miles to M-125 (Monroe Street), including the Wikipedia article on M-125.  The image map used on the M-50 article shows that it runs all the way to I-75 through Monroe's east end, going even further than M-125.  Third, various maps, such as Google, show M-50 running past M-125, going through the eastside, but then turning on North Dixie Highway toward Monroe's north side (Frenchtown) and then ending at I-75.  For possible endings for M-50:
# At US-24 (North Telegraph Road)?
# At M-125 (Monroe Street) in downtown Monroe?
# At I-75 running through the eastside (Front Street) to I-75?
# At I-75 running through the northside (Front Street–Winchester–N. Dixie Highway) to I-75?
I live in Monroe, and there are M-50 signs going to and ending at M-125 (but another source says those signs are recently outdated).  I've also never seen M-50 signs running past that point all the way to I-75.  So, what's the eastern terminus?  I don't want to make any incorrect changes, but I don't believe that it is US-24 as the article states. —№tǒŖïøŭş4lĭfė ♫♪ 22:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Michigan Highways, a usually reliable source indicates it formerly extended to M-125 and that in October 2006 it was scaled back to US 24. Prior to that up till c. 1996-1997, it had extended to I-75. Michigan Highway Ends has photographs from 2002 of the end at M-125 as well as photos of the previous end at I-75.  This map from the Michigan DOT shows M-50 ending at US 24. older ≠ wiser 16:43, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the Webmaster of Michigan Highway Ends.  I have not updated the M-50 Page yet, but I have received a photo of, and have personally driven by, the M-50 ENDS shield assembly that now stands in front of the US 24/Telegraph Rd. intersection.  I will have it up in the next update, but this has been the **official** Eastern Terminus of M-50 since November 2006.  DanTheMan474 (talk) 20:22, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastern terminus 

message: The text is copied in full below:
Effective date of transfer: October 4, 2006
Roadway segments transferred from MDOT to the City of Monroe, to
become City Major Streets:
M-50/Front Street, from the centerline of US-24/Telegraph Road
easterly to the centerline of M-125/Monroe Street, a distance of 1.02
miles, in control section 58042;
M-50/First Street, from the centerline of M-50/Front Street easterly
to the centerline of M-125/Monroe Street, a distance of 0.17 miles, in
control section 58042;
Comprising a total distance of 1.19 miles.
Imzadi 1979 →  06:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memorandum of Understanding
Talk:Jürgen Grabowski

message: The format of this page needs to be changed to one similar to other footballer's pages. Maybe change the infobox, and (although it is a nice table) remove the table showing each international appearance, unless a similar table is included for every player, which I don't think is necessary. - ChaChaFut 04:05, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah forgot about the box, will change it. I'll move his record of international statistics to my user page thingy-ma-jig and link it :) Don't go deleting stuff till it's all sorted out please! Thanks for reminding me :)--Tiresais 11:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok should be all done now! Is there anything else to do?--Tiresais 12:17, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you got it. The page is now consistent with most other player's pages. Thanks. - ChaChaFut 22:12, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Shifts cape* All in a days work!--Tiresais 22:58, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:Staying Fat for Sarah Byrnes

message: This is a terrible article. It's just an outline with terrible spelling and grammatical errors. Did an eighth grader write this after a book report? I'll be making serious adjustments when I get the time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ranhalt (talk • contribs) 02:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs to be rewritten 

message: Why does the end of the article say that the book was released in paperback before it was published?
69.72.85.157 00:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Time agreement?
Talk:Barbary treaties

message: might this treaty also be a part of this list: 
Moroccan-American Treaty of Friendship of 1783.  Thanks Hmains 04:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There were four live links in this article.Treaty with Algeria (1795) Treaty with Tripoli (1796) ,Treaty with Tunis (1797) and Treaty with Tripoli (1805). Now both Algeria and Tripoli 1805 are directed to Tripoli 1796 by bot. So there are actually only two live links. I think at least Algerian treaty deserves a seperate article. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:58, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two links are dead 

message: It's just a list of links, one of which goes to a one-line stub, three are dead and the rest all redirect to the same article. It's also misnamed, since it ignores all treaties made by the Barabary States with all other states except the USA. Zburh (talk) 17:34, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs to go
Talk:Jennifer Jayne

message: I'm not clear why the above, which looks like part of the article, is on the discussion page.  I don't know enough about the subject to incorporate it confidently.  What I did add is that she played William Tell's wife; the existing wording seemed to me to miss the point.
Rogersansom (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 16:53, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ??
Talk:Ralph Gracie

message: I clearly recall reading an interview where he was asked and confirmed a story about him choking out a feral dog that came at him in a market square and when it came too it licked him  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.58.45.220 (talk) 20:35, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  his nickname 
Talk:Karel Kaplan

message: The speddy deletion tag was placed automaticly after a confusion ("save page" instead of "show preview"). I think that Karel Kaplan have his importance. He is quoted by some other wikipedia articles (not written by me).
* He's definitely one of important Czech historians, specialist on post-war period. Pavel Vozenilek 16:28, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Portal talk:Philippines/Archive 1

message: This has to be updated. zzzzzzz.... --Howard the Duck | talk, 12:45, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wanted to feature Georg Joseph Kamel and his pioneering book on Philippine medicinal plants. ...tommorrow. .. Uh maybe day after.(next week)zzzzzzzzzzzzz--Jondel 13:05, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can take care of events, but I'm just surprised that there are sections dating back to February.  --Akira123323 Say what? | Track record 09:19, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

message: *Georg Joseph Kamel--Jondel 08:46, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for Did you know that column

message: ...it has been that ever since I was a lurker... --Howard the Duck 02:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know.  I left a message in the tambayan for some suggestions.  --Sky Harbor 10:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lets change the selected article already...
Talk:Paul Buentello

message: It says his next fight after UFC was in 2009, which isn't true as he had a bunch of fights in the meantime as you can see from his record below.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.36.147 (talk) 16:44, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career description is misleading 

message: The submission on Kevin Jordan was neck crank, not a guillotine. While the tap was more likely due to exhaustion by Jordan, neck crank is a more accurate description of the hold.82.141.196.178 (talk) 15:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Submission - Kevin Jordan
Talk:Stringer Bell

message: The article currently states that String is "arguably" the most popular character - this needs a source to stay in.--Opark 77 04:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the most egregious cases (i.e. a published news article describing Nelson Mandela as an African-American) the fault was not overzealous political correctness but rather an automated algorithm making changes without sufficient human oversight. Aliza250 (talk) 18:00, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel wording

message: I don't know how to add this properly as a citation but here is the link which confirms the orgin section (about Stringer Reed & Russell Bell).
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/aug/02/reallifeandthensome  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.217.151.95 (talk) 15:55, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 16:00, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for Origin Section 

message: Tense in the plot summary shouldn't be past tense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.49.58 (talk) 02:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tense 

message: This article, on a fictional character, is included in the category Baltimore City Community College alumni, a category otherwise composed of real people. That seems inappropriate, but I don't know how to check what the criteria really are for the category. Claudia (talk) 21:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alumnus? 

message: Earlier cite: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/matthewzeitlin/the-wires-stringer-bell-has-some-advice-for-jpmorgan (2013) Aliza250 (talk) 13:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Stringer Bell Rule
Talk:Tim Folzenlogen

message: I appreciate your contributions to the article. I've removed the line "Straight out of college, he found a patron not previously known to him, and has been a full-time professional artist ever since." as well as the reference to how much money his paintings sell for. I think these things make him sound less famous. We shouldn't need to mention things like that for a notable artist. We don't need to mention how much Hopper's paintings sell for; neither do we here (unless it's especially notable or unusual).
Also, although the critical commentary can be a good aid, it's not good to have so much that is so positive because it makes the article sound one sided and unencyclopedic. It's best to have comments that are specific and insightful, rather than general (positive or negative). Hope this helps. MarkBuckles 02:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I really appreciate yours. The copyedit was very good, and I think you're right about the minor items you deleted more recently, though my idea was to fill in the biographical information. I spent a couple hours looking at other artist's pages on Wikipedia, and have a better idea of what to do, but by all means go ahead and do some more editing on this page. I think your edits are of high quality, and appreciate them. Let me ask you a couple questions: I've added categories that seem appropriate, but I'm not really familiar enough with the way categories are used to be completely confident in my choices. If you would have a look I'd appreciate it. Also, despite what someone said in the AfD, I'm thinking that the reference to the Hyun Jin Moon episode be further de-emphasized; it seems like a more appropriate place for it is in the footnote. What do you think? Third, I've cut down one of the quotations after considering (for too long) how to do it; I think I need a second opinion. Are further cuts waranted? If so, please have another go. Thanks. -Exucmember 14:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions
Talk:Phrase (rapper)

message: Um .. this page is blatant non NPOV and advertising —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.194.13.101 (talk) 04:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There's no listing for Phrase at australian-charts.com; can anyone dig up a verifiable reference from a reliable source?
:All the chart positions are taken from the ARIA report archive at pandora.nla.gov.au. Australian-charts.com only lists things that reached the top 50 of the main charts; that's why he has no listing there. Nathan86 (talk) 12:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How's about adding the references then? Precious Roy (talk) 12:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because I really can't be bothered going through the entire years archives to find them again. Nathan86 (talk) 12:39, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unreferenced content can be removed—keep that in mind. It's one thing to say the refs are there but without them, it's not verifiable. Precious Roy (talk) 12:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've told you where they are; if they're that important you can always go and look for them yourself. Nathan86 (talk) 12:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Clever has nothing to do with it. The chart claims have been tagged as unsourced for some time now. Any unsourced material can be removed. You declined to provide the sources that you claim exist. A link to seven years' worth of reports does not make for a verifiable reference. Without a verifiable reference, the unsourced content can be removed. Precious Roy (talk) 01:39, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, I have provided the source. How is it not verifiable? Nathan86 (talk) 01:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because you need a link to the specific citation. You can't just say "it was in Time magazine"; it has to be "Time magazine, January 7, 2008, page 32". Find the specific reports for each chart claim and THEN the content is sourced. A vague link is not a source. Precious Roy (talk) 01:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your "Time Magazine" argument holds no weight since I have provided a link to where the data is from. Besides which, seeing as the information is not doubtful it should have just been flagged with a "Citation needed" (if it was unsourced, which it was not). But instead you've chosen the childish option of just deleting the information. And again, since you're the one who wants the specific citation so badly, why don't you look it up yourself? Nathan86 (talk) 02:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's Wikipedia that wants the citation. You really don't see the difference between providing a link to 7 years of reports and a link to the specific report the information is in? You were warned that unsourced content could be removed and I gave you ample time to provide the proper references but you "can't be bothered". Well if you "so badly" want the chart position claims included in the article you should look them up. Precious Roy (talk) 02:19, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chart positions