Talk:Kanawha County textbook controversy

message: The orphaned tag means that there are few or no links to an article (I randomly accessed it.)
For this one, first I wonder why it was written, then why it was tagged :
*Written because the event mentioned is notable in a WP sense. Such things do not happen frequently and tell more, about our world, than plenty of standard news.
*Tagged, yes, but the unfrequency conveys a lack of links! The event was quite unpreceded and came in an obscure (if I won't sadden someones) county. What to say ?
The candidate links are :
*The county itself
*Schoolbooks politics
*Category:surprising events (!!!)
*Closed communities (?), &c. Your advice ? -- DLL   .. T 16:27, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it isn't part of the overarching theme of U.S. history or related to anything else particularly, I would want to see it linked in "See also" sections of relevant articles. Ashibaka tock 19:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphaned ?

message: This event is often cited as one, among many, which mobilized the religious/christian right movement in the US. This should be added to the article and also links to this article could be added to pages about the religious right.Bpot 01:16, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alas, I only know about this one Shii (tock) formerly Ashibaka 18:20, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not to mention the violence, etc. made it into the national news at the time and it was much discussed in academic journals thereafter. 71.236.93.51 (talk) 12:36, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: I added a Clarification needed notice to the sentence "An elementary school and a school board building were bombed." It doesn't state whether the schools were fire bombed or bombed from the air.--Auric (talk) 19:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there were bombs planted at the schools. Shii (tock) 21:47, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think in context most people can assume that the schools were NOT bombed from the air. 71.236.93.51 (talk) 12:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed 

message: Why is there no mentio of the jugement, i.e. "The court has concluded that the committee's rejection of Mississippi: Conflict and Change, while not constituting censorship per se, was certainly an impermissible rejection because the procedure violated the plaintiffs' constitutional rights. The court concludes that the rejection of the book for the reasons given evidences a racially discriminatory purpose on the part of the defendants. The court has found that the textbook was not rejected for any justifiable reason. The lack of a justifiable reason is not in and of itself a constitutional violation. However, the court has also found that the racial issues substantially influenced the committee in its decision. That finding, coupled with the finding that the legislative history suggests an intent to perpetuate ideas of segregation and discrimination, leads this court to conclude that the requisite "discriminatory intent" has been demonstrated. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 97 S. Ct. 555, 50 L. Ed. 2d 450 (1977)."? Veverve (talk) 16:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jugement 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved
Per WP:COMMONNAME.
(non-admin closure)  Havelock Jones (talk) 11:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Kanawha County textbook controversy → ? – 'Controversy' is very much a euphemism when bombs are involved... the Oklahoma incident isn't called a controversy... there were other incidents here as detailed, but surely having 'terrorism' in the title, or maybe 'terroristic controversy' should be adequate (as the categories themselves indicate)... it's violence made for political reasons, and even if it was successful it's still terrorism... 92.0.5.48 (talk) 06:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 August 2021