lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Grimsthorpe Castle

message: The article says that the gardens were laid out with the help of Peter Coates. I think it is very unlikely that this Peter Coates is the person in question, so I have removed the wikilinks! It may possibly be the Peter Coats, landscape designer, mentioned en passant as the partner of Henry Channon, but I don't know for sure. I wish people would be more careful when linking to people's names and make sure the article they link to refers to the right person! SiGarb | (Talk) 12:02, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Coates misidentified
Talk:Liverpool Castle

message: Has its demolition ever been lamented by the Corporation of Liverpool? Was it ever considered a short-sighted venture? Or has its removal always been seen as a benefit to the greater good? 5.81.0.91 (talk) 17:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It was demolished 300 years ago, in 1715.  Why do you think later authorities would have given its removal any significant consideration?  Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loss?
Template talk:Swiss Federal Council elections

message: Hi! Great work on the template, I've just changed a few things:
* The naming convention for elections is "Country type election, year" -- if more than one election of the same type in a given year, "Country type election, month year". I've changed the links to that.
* I've merged the links to article on elections in the same month, as I assume they were two rounds of the same instance of election.
—Nightstallion 13:55, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:NOAAS Oceanographer

message: As of today, the ship is at Stabbert Maritime in Ballard.  The radome as been removed and the name "Sahara" is on the port side of the bow, otherwise it is clearly the same vessel.  Can be seen in Stabbert promotional materials  and ; also in Windows Local Live aerial photos.  Brianhe 05:55, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If it has been officially renamed, then I believe we should rename the article as well - leaving a redirect from this name. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:49, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 status: in shipyard
Talk:Cessna 620

message: List of Cessna experimental aircraft show two Cessna 620s the prototype registered N620E and another aircraft N620F. Was N620F actually built or abandoned before it was finished? MilborneOne (talk) 18:36, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Everything I can find simply says "one prototype", despite two numbers being listed; the question is was there actually a registration "reserved" for a second aircraft, or is this one of those cases where an error has memetically spread through the sources? - The Bushranger One ping only 20:19, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources that list Cessna experimental construction numbers show serial number 620 as N620E and 621 as N620F, just as an example here is a not reliable source that lists N620F  MilborneOne (talk) 20:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: And here it is in a book . The catch is that everything other than registration lists says "sole prototype"... - The Bushranger One ping only 20:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: N620F
Talk:Abbey Mills Pumping Station

message: The article lead claims:
"It has a twin, Crossness Pumping Station, south of the River Thames at Crossness, at the end of the Southern Outfall Sewer."
I do not believe this to be correct in any detail.  First: Crossness is not a twin as its architectural layout is completely different.  Second, they are not even in equivalent positions in the sewage chain.  Crossness, was at the end of the Southern Outfall and its purpose was to lift the sewage into a reservoir above the river level for release on the ebbing tide.  Abbey Mills, by contrast was at the beginning of the Northern Outfall and its purpose was to raise sewerage from the interceptor sewers into the Northern Outfall.  
Abbey Mills's southern counterpart was actually at Deptford, but the original no longer exists being replaced by an electric pumping station.  Crossness's counterpart was actually in the Beckton area (just up river from Crossness), but this too no longer exists as the land was more valuable for building space and a more modern sewage treatment works now handles the outfall (as is now the case at Crossness).  Crossness pumping station survived only because the dismantling costs far exceeded the scrap value of the engines, building materials and the land value put together (Crossness was in the middle of nowhere at the time of its decommisioning). 109.156.49.202 (talk) 12:31, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Lead reworked to remove "twin". Bob1960evens (talk) 12:13, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Information
Talk:Rump steak

message: Re: this edit, the British-English name for that set of muscles is indeed the "rump primal" but contrary to the edit summary it is basically the same set of muscles as are described in Loin#Loins in butchery.  Admittedly, "loin primal" is American-English usage and makes a mildly confusing landing place for readers but at least the reader gets a smidge of new knowledge by following that link.  The confusion can be cleared up by expanding and putting some global perspective into the target article.   The alternate target Beef#UK primal cuts takes the reader to a list that circular-redirects back to this same page.  I think that will be much more frustrating and confusing for readers than the confusion over British/American English.  Rossami (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't. Did you see the mess on the refdesk when some of us made the mistake of linking to Wikipedia articles to explain what types of steak would make a good meal? Explaining a British cut by linking to an American one of a different name just perpetuates the confusion and reinforces the US-centric state of our articles in this area. The UK primal cuts link has the advantage of a picture, which is clear and easy to understand. DuncanHill (talk) 18:00, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  In this case, I don't think that we are "linking to an American" cut of meat.  It's the same cut, just a different name.  (At the primal level, anyway.  I get the impression that there may be differences at sub-primal and below.  It would be nice if we had a butcher trained in both traditions who could take the lead here.)  The right answer is to fix the target so it's wording is not so US-centric.  Adding the UK picture to that page makes sense.  I've attempted a draft.  It's not perfect but maybe it's a start.  We've got to find something better than that circular link.  Rossami (talk) 19:47, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The British naming convention for the "rump" primal
Talk:Borough of Rossendale

message: The entire section about Rossendale radio is so prominent that it is singling it out, however it "was" just part of the entertainment and should remain within that section.
However since it was discontinued in 2012 it is misleading to continue to give it so much space in such a prominent position on the page.
A mention that Rossendale once had a radio station is enough - perhaps someone can add a link to the Rossendale Radio Wikipedia page where - if a reader is interested they can find out more.
I have removed the entire section and left a mention of the website - that is adequate.
Cadstar_User (talk) 22:27, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rossendale Radio spam

message: The bit about the choir was clearly added by someone who was involved with it, so I toned it down to just mention when it was formed and added a citation. But after thinking about it, I wonder if I should just delete that bit entirely. There's no article about the choir for a start.
Any thoughts? KaraLG84 (talk) 09:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query re inclusion of Rossendale Male Voice Choir
Talk:Demographics of Slovakia

message: "The official state language is Slovak, and Hungarian is widely spoken in the southern regions, although it is banned completely as an official language, and people found talking Hungarian in the street (even foreigners) can be punished with a large fine or jail (Which is serious violation of at least three international laws).Hungarians living in towns of Western Slovakia like Nitra, Vrable, Levice a Nove Zamky - personal testimony - speak freely in Hungarian in the streets and shops and nobody harasses and punishes them for doing so."
These two statements contradict each other. As well, Wikipedia should be based on research rather than unverifiable and unattributed "personal testimony". 
Political situation vis-a-vis ethic minorities should also be added: They are part of the new (2010) government. As well, a section on education should be added, e.g. Selye_János_University that was established in 2004.  
Thanks. Iswikinumber2 (talk) 03:10, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:Marine defense battalions

message: While the table looks good for now, I think it would be best replaced by a paragraph on each battalion's history making this article one stop shopping for all of the Defense Battalions.--Looper5920 (talk) 04:37, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was one of my thoughts yesterday, but I'd been picking away at it for hours. That and I didn't want to make it seem like I ripped it right out of the references. bahamut0013♠♣ 16:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Table 

message: This article's title has all words beginning with capital letters.  Then, the first use has "Marine Defense batallions".  Following Wikipedia naming conventions and looking at usage in the body of Melson's Condition Red:Marine Defense Battalions in World War II, I think the page should be renamed Marine defense battalions with the same capitialization in the beginning of the article.  I'll wait for responses/comments before making the move. — ERcheck (talk) 13:12, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Uniformity is important for appearance. I have so edited the article, but a specific units (i.e. 1st Defense Battalion) was left capitalized as a name. bahamut0013♠♣ 13:18, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Definitely for specific units, as you say, since they are in the names, rather than descriptive.  — ERcheck (talk) 13:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalizations 

message: I have come across some references to US Army Defense Battalions serving on Pacific islands as garrisons duting WW2. Anyone have any information om these? Were they organized the same as Marine Defense Battalions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.111.44.102 (talk) 13:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Army Defense Battalions?
Talk:Blue Train (Japan)

message: More expansion can be done on this article from the Japanese Wikipedia article (:ja:ブルートレイン (日本)), and from the various news articles which have come up recently, following announcements of the plans to discontinue the services. One such article can be found here: 東京駅発、消えゆくブルトレ　「銀河」「富士」「はやぶさ」…利用客減、廃止の方向 (Asahi Shinbun, 26 November 2007). I may come back to do this translation work myself, though I don't have the time or energy right now. If anyone else is interested, please do jump in. LordAmeth (talk) 14:46, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: Although the Akebono is still listed as 'seasonal' service, in fact it has not run since the 2014 spring season.  It can effectively be treated as discontinued, since there is no chance it will return even on a seasonal basis after March 2016 when the other Aomori services are scheduled to be discontinued.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 猫に小判 (talk • contribs) 13:52, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Akebono & Cassiopeia 
Talk:Jalan Sungai Putat

message: *I've removed the prod tag on this because, according to WP:OUTCOMES, "In the U.S., state and interstate highways (aka: freeways, turnpikes, expressways and motorways) are acceptable. In Canada, any highway that is part of a province's or territory's official highway system is acceptable.". This is the equivalent in Malaysia. If it's to be deleted it should at least be discussed at Afd first. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:US-mil-ship-stub

message: How about United States Army vessels? Anyone have any objections to adding them as part of the stub? — Bellhalla (talk) 14:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The Air Force has ships as well... I think the wording "This article about a specific United States military ship or boat is a stub." would work best to cover all of our bases. bahamut0013wordsdeeds  16:24, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made the change. An alternative could also be "This article about a specific ship or boat of the United States military (Navy, Coast Guard, Army, or Air Force) is a stub." Though stub templates aren't supposed to be navigational aides like that! :P bahamut0013wordsdeeds 12:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Kansai Time Out

message: This page was listed with AfD. In the event it survives, here are a few references I found that may contribute to expanding this article. I used a simple Google search ("kansai time out" -wikipedia) and got hits including the following:
Mention in a travel guide calling it an excellent resource for Kansai  There also is a reasonably in depth article in the Japan Times written on the occasion of 25 years in print here.  There are many, many other hits that I just don't have time to go through right now, but this publication appears to host film screenings , and participate in journalism conferences .  There's another reprint of a Japan Times article for 30 years in print . Xymmax (talk) 17:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References found during Afd
Talk:Persimmon plc

message: The article currently refers to an alleged incident at Coity the circumstances surrounding which are disputed by the company. It seems to me that either (i) this was a serious incident which should be reported to the Health & Safety Executive so they can investigate it and publish any adverse findings; the findings could, at that time, be properly cited on Wikipedia in accordance with WP:CITE or (ii) this was a minor incident, as asserted by the company, in which case the disclosure in the article is defamatory and should be immediately removed per WP:LIBEL. Either way the allegation should be deleted for now. Dormskirk (talk) 16:15, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The incident is now cited and it does appear to be a serious incident so I am OK for it to remain. Dormskirk (talk) 11:09, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incident at Coity 

message: Captain Wacky HJS (talk) 12:45, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is revealing, isn't it. I think the article needs some work for NPOV and could also use some expansion of the History section. I've removed a bit of less-important stuff from the criticism section. Ovinus (talk) 19:33, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section Sizes
Talk:Bhamodi

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:50, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Bhander

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:50, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Bhanpura

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 
Talk:Barugo

message: About: The Sultanate of Nasunogan and Mystical Valley
Whoever wrote about these rubbish lies must be making a big joke out of the town of Barugo. It's not true that there's such a Sultanate state called Nasunugan. Nasunugan is just a sitio, a part of Barangay Tutug-an. Yes, there's a place called Cabarasan, it's one of the barangays of the municipality of Barugo. But definitely it was never called a mystical valley and the rest in the subtopics, "The Sultanate of Sulu' and "Mystical Valley - Cabarasan" are pure lies. This user, with an IP address 71.163.14.119, is obviously making a mockery of my beloved hometown. I'm calling the administrator of this page to please watch out for the aforementioned user  because he might mess around again in this article as well as in other articles. Bornok 20 (talk) 03:15, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Bharveli

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:52, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Bhaurasa

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Bhavra

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Bhedaghat

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Bhikangaon

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Batboat

message: The Batskiboat is just a version of the Batboat.  The Batskiboat article is not currently long enough to stand on its own.  It would make more sense as a section within the Batboat article.
Neelix (talk) 15:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Batskiboat]]

message: The Batsub is currently partially addressed in a section of the Batboat article.  The Batsub article is not currently long enough to stand on its own.  It would make more sense as a section within the Batboat article.
Neelix (talk) 15:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Batsub]]

message: The Batstrike is just a version of the Batsub.  The Batstrike article is not currently long enough to stand on its own.  It would make more sense as a section within the Batboat article.
Neelix (talk) 15:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Batstrike]]

message: Put the Animated Series submersible batboat on a milk carton, it's missing. I assume The Batman series has one too, but I'm not as familiar with that show. --Noclevername (talk) 15:08, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Animated

message: If an image is added to the infobox, and one like should be, please restrict it to a single example from the comics, not from the TV shows or films.
Thanks,
- J Greb (talk) 20:47, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image note 
Talk:Bhilakhedi

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:53, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Bhitarwar

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: Parvati Valley should be linked to this article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parvati Valley link 

message: Parts of this article read as though they were written by someone who is not very fluent in English. There are also some subjective descriptions that were removed, such as calling it a "beautiful town". More probably need to be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.167.40.32 (talk) 17:14, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written
Talk:Biaora

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:55, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition 

message: MODERN MOBILE BIAORA
MOBILE SHOP 
CONTACT NO. 9981977088
OWNER NAME TAHER SAIFY 
NEW COMPUTERS, MOBILE PHONES,ACCESSORIES  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TAHERMODERN (talk • contribs) 12:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  MODERN MOBILE
Talk:Income tax on gambling

message: I don't think that by itself this article is notable. I'm not sure how to fix it, but since it focuses so much on section 165 of the US tax code, perhaps the article should be about that. Loss on sale of residential property could probably be merged into it. Killian441 (talk) 23:27, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I came to this site because i was looking for a list of countries that tax/don't tax gambling winns  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.95.142.180 (talk) 12:24, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Is it not the case in the UK that gambling income is taxable if it is the person's "principal source of income"? I always thought it was a bit of a legal grey area.Paulturtle (talk) 01:32, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Principal Source of Income 

message: >> For online poker, however, because of a hairy legislation, the wins are not taxable yet. <<
What on earth is meant by "a hairy legislation"? -- Picapica (talk) 08:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Germany