lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gundam Battle

message: Please explain how a reference to a non-existant link provides any meaningful information to the article and is not original research before reverting back. Thank you.GundamsRus 21:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please explain 

message: I was looking at the article, and I thought it was released in America. Could we rectify this by adding the countries where this was released? 207.199.222.64 (talk) 13:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Battle Chronicle released in Japan only? 

message: I know that this game was release only outside of Asia, and I have never played any of them.  Anyone got information about this and should we include this totally different genre game here or start a new article?  MythSearchertalk 11:47, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gundam Battle Assualt
Talk:Shauna Seliy

message: Shauna Seliy is a notable new, highly touted young novelist published by a major New York publisher. Her mentor is the African-American writer John Edgar Wideman. Her first book has already been reviewed in the San Francisco Chronicle with other major newspapers to follow. Serious artists are worthy of a Wikipedia entry.Rudowsky 18:24, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable

message: I removed the speedy tags from this page as the article clearly asserts the notability of the subject. Moreover, the subject appears to satisfy WP:N as her novel has had several reviews e.g.  CIreland 18:26, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't so sure about the notability claims, and there was no mention of the reviews in the article at the time. I will trust your judgment on this one. DarkAudit 18:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy Tag
Talk:Reem Riyashi

message: Ahem; there seem to have been an article on this women from Oct. 2005, under the name Reem El-Reyashi ("there cannot be too many redirs." etc. etc., heard it before? ;-) ) Anyway, since that other article wasn´t very good (->no sources), (...this article is much, much better) ...I have made a redir here. This is what Reem El-Reyashi looked like just before  I made a redir: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reem_El-Reyashi&oldid=151451184      
Regards, Huldra 16:17, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Reem El-Reyashi]] 

message: The victims in this case were all military, military police, or paramilitary personnel, during a period of violent unrest, on the border of a parcel of land that the israeli state militarily occupied in violation of international law. To call this "murder" under these circumstances is as nonsensical any other instance of describing IDF personnel killed in battle in Gaza or the West Bank as "murder victims". The Israeli government is not an impartial source and they're literally the only people who refer to soldiers killed in armed confrontations or during the intifadas "murder victims". 2607:FEA8:A4E0:11EC:8597:A62B:9BD1:8367 (talk) 10:33, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the link to "Palestinian mass murderers"
Talk:Senglea

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.islalocalcouncil.com/historicalinfo.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Alzarian16 (talk) 12:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Evangeline Williamson

message: {editprotected} - removed, with no supporting text its impossible for an admin to know what a user wants editing SGGH speak! 21:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Why unprocted, the anon ips are coming back--Migospia†♥ 19:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unprotect 
Talk:Washington for Jesus

message: This is the first edition of this page for what I would imagine will eventually contain many changes/ submissions. Although I attended several of the meetings first-hand, I attempted to restrict any commentary, follow common guidelines for journalism, and keep the article focused on the type of information that would appear in any generic article about the events that took place. Any comments, challenges, input or other information would be welcome and appreciated. johntindale 18:33, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Edition
Talk:Gerald R. Ford Birthsite and Gardens

message: Since Ford didn't grow up in the city and had no true association with it, you can't blame the city for not wanting to spend money on his birthplace site. It doesn't have much meaning, compared with recognizing people who lived here or grew up here.--Parkwells (talk) 16:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Memorial

message: Too many gory details are given about Ford and his mother's miserable early life. This article is supposed to be about the site and gardens - there is already a full article about his life. I don't think such detailed material is appropriate here, especially when there is little to describe what the foundation is trying to do with the gardens.  My intention is to delete most of the family stuff and cover it only in summary fashion.--Parkwells (talk) 16:16, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Family
Talk:International Cooperative Alliance

message: :Statement on the Co-operative Identity was merged into this article and reorganized.  The article was directly linked to this one, had only one primary source, and did not meet the criteria for stand-alone status, so I felt this would be an uncontested move.  Otr500 (talk) 04:40, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement on the Co-operative Identity
Talk:Lesser Antillean macaw

message: --- Ara (sic!) sp. !??? ---
Is this some kind of sarcastic comment?
::first sign your comments. and secondly no. The term sic! was common by some biologists until the 19th century for first scientific descriptions. --Melly42 (talk) 09:26, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would appear the IUCN has removed this form their website? Maybe they don't find it valid anymore? FunkMonk (talk) 00:55, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Appears they don't find it valid, but the recently described subfossil may change this. Here their earlier entry is archived: FunkMonk (talk) 14:22, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

text: I was thinking along the same lines... Though I think such changes can take years... FunkMonk (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUCN status 

message: The link to the Williams article goes to a different article about bats instead. Brutannica (talk) 15:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Strange, removed link. FunkMonk (talk) 15:55, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong link

message: Just curious, but what's the opposite? Is there a Greater Antillean macaw? :) - Floydian τ ¢ 19:29, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Though this is of course in jest, it touches on something that has annoyed me. Since this bird is only known from Guadeloupe, but other species of macaw may have lived on other Lesser Antillean islands, it should really be called the Guadeloupe macaw, since there would be other Lesser Antillean macaws. But that name is the official name according to BirdLife International. By that logic, the Cuban macaw could just as well have been called the "Greater Antillean macaw", as Cuba is part of the Greater Antilles... It is probably because this bird was also once thought to have lived on both Guadeloupe and Martinique, hence it would need a name implying a wider range... FunkMonk (talk) 19:36, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lesser Antillean macaw
Talk:2006 International Rules Series

message: Can someone please verify this comment?
For as long as I remember (about 8 years) all Tests in Australia have been played under floodlights. Is there a difference in the defenition of "floodlights" of which I am unaware, or is this meant to state that it was the first Test on Irish soil to be played under floodlights? Sem boy (talk) 12:18, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "First International Rules Test ot be played under floodlights" 
Talk:Holy Names Academy

message: Some on has changed our website to post incorrect information.  Please monitor this page more closely to insure accurate information.
: You can do this youself.  Just click "watch" at the top of the page. Loren.wilton (talk) 22:25, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Each class has a different color to demonstrate their spirit.
Class of '12: Green
Class of '11: Yellow
Class of '10: Blue
Class od '09: Red
The freshman are always green; the new sophomores always inherit the previous senior class's color.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.79.147.101 (talk) 20:36, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  School Spirit 

message: It is utterly anachronistic to say that the Holy Names Academy was once in the International District, as against being in the area later known as the International District. There was no such thing as the International District when Holy Names was there: it was on the now-destroyed Jackson Hill. To say that Holy Names Academy was in the International District is like saying that Columbus may have been to Havana. - Jmabel | Talk 23:58, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "International District"
Talk:Ahane GAA

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://ahane.mygaaclub.com/home/the-boiling-bulletin/about/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 11:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Galois group

message: Does anyone think it might benefit to mention (I believe it's called) the Conjugation Isomorphism Theorem? It basically says that if two numbers a and b algebraic over a field, then a mapping defined between the field extensions obtained by ajoining a and b which sends  \Sigma_{i} c_i a^i  to  \Sigma_{i} c_i b^i  is an isomorphism if and only if a and b are conjugate over the original field. This theorem has some useful corollaries.LkNsngth (talk) 05:11, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Beneficial to mention a certain theorem?

message: I find the definition slightly confusing. The second sentence reads: "An automorphism of E/F is defined to be an automorphism of E that fixes F pointwise." However, the general definition of automorphisms says nothing about any "pointwise fixing". Thus it would be perfectly possible (I think) to define an automorphism of E/F such that no such pointwise fixing occurs. Shouldn't then the sentence in question read: "Let us define an automorphism of E/F such that F is fixed pointwise"? The following third example would then explain what it means, and then the fourth sentence would read "The set of all SUCH automorphisms..." etc. Regards, Borys (27.03.2011)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.213.206.177 (talk) 12:53, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: We need to make it clear that this is the definition of an automorphism of a field extension, not just something that we are defining. An automorphism of an algebraic object is required to fix the distinguished elements (constants / nullary operations), so this definition is the expected one anyway - for what else is E/F, if not E with the elements of F considered as distinguished elements? --Zundark (talk) 13:39, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automorphism in definition 

message: In 2014 a new user made substantial changes to a copy of this page at User:Wjxzhang/sandbox. 
Please would an interested editor assess the usefulness of that work, incorporate what is appropriate into this article, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 14:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned user draft
Talk:Cimmeria (continent)

message: This article has greatly improved over the past week - kudos to  for all the hard work. However, I do have one concern. The article has two citation styles, the name/year style and the footnote style. This is discouraged (see Variation in citation methods). I recommend replacing all the name/year citations by footnotes. This will also make the article look more like an encyclopedia article and less like a scientific review. I will make a couple of changes to illustrate the idea. RockMagnetist(talk) 17:01, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks .  And I have to agree.  I guess I've been using this mix of citation styles because one is default on Wikipedia and the other in my references.  I'll try to use footnotes systematically henceforth. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 07:15, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I know what you mean. It took me a while to get used to Wikipedia's style; and I wouldn't dare put a footnote after a period in a refereed publication! RockMagnetist(talk) 00:10, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation style 

message: Per my arguments earlier, I propose that Cimmerian Plate be merged into (or rather redirected to) Cimmeria (continent).  The former is unreferenced and contains factual errors.-- Fama Clamosa (talk) 12:52, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  : Thank you for your support.  I was considering "superterrane" too, but, to my knowledge, that word is not universally used and probably need some explanation to most people.  "Continent" is more KISS principle. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 16:38, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds reasonable. I have no strong feelings about it. RockMagnetist(talk) 17:54, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:   --Fama Clamosa (talk) 16:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: This page states "Apart from the Altiplano in Bolivia, almost all the world’s deposits of antimony as stibnite are found in Cimmeria, with the major mines being in Turkey, Yunnan and Thailand." However, page Xikuangshan Mine says "Xikuangshan mine (simplified Chinese: 锡矿山; traditional Chinese: 錫礦山; pinyin: Xīkuàngshān) in Lengshuijiang, Hunan, China,[1] contains the world's largest deposit of antimony.[2] It is unique in that there is a large deposit of stibnite (Sb2S3) in a layer of Devonian limestone." I see these two claims as mutually exclusive. --Zds (talk) 14:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy on antimony
Talk:You'll Never Stop Me Loving You

message: I believe that the correct title of this song might be You'll Never Stop Me From Loving You (current article title does not include the word "From"). This is certainly the line in the lyrics, and the song's entry at EveryHit.com agrees. Conversely, Google returns more results for the song title without the "from", so I could be wrong.
I am struggling to prove this definitively either way - a scan or photograph of the single's cover would be ideal, if someone can provide it.  
Leevclarke 18:58, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Basra reed warbler

message: ... this might be interesting: Klaas van Dijk. 'Publisher Taylor & Francis refuses to retract a fraudulent study on the endangered Basra Reed-Warbler Acrocephalus griseldis.' Authorea. October 09, 2020. DOI: 10.22541/au.160227182.23124117/v1. Eissink (talk) 13:23, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  For experts ...
Talk:Trzciniec culture

message: Regrettably, this article reflects exclusively older Polish views. HJJHolm (talk) 09:42, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

message: Iranic speaker 1700-1300 BC in Europe, what is that? Indoarier-Theory from India? Or Proto-Sarmates?  
And a "proto-slawic" construction as child of a eastgermanic lausitzer culture, what you think had spoken this peoples, 
slawic or eastgermanic? Next we have proto-bolgars in the european bronze age. Great Map, wonderful wishes from Panslawism.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:46:D03:74F6:3DBF:FAAA:CF8E:C734 (talk) 23:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  sweety map 

message: There are two villages called Trzciniec near Opole Lubelskie, Trzciniec, Gmina Chodel and Trzciniec, Gmina Łaziska; shouldn't it be possible to clarify which one is eponymous? Languagehat (talk) 13:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Pomeranian culture

message: This Study about Urns shows, the lausitzer culture, the nordic circle and the pommeranian culture in the balticum and gotland have the same source in late bronze middle Germany. House Urns and Face urns start in the house urns culture in middle germany as culture transfer from villanova region and came about the amber road. 
http://www.academia.edu/1009530/2007_House_urns._Study_of_a_Late_Bronze_Age_Trans-Cultural_Phenomenon  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:46:D02:CC5:C96B:F117:D99B:1A7C (talk) 02:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map is false
Talk:Grass warbler

message: The title is Grass warbler, but the text of the article only refers to grasshopper warblers. Is one of those wrong or am I misunderstanding? Thanks,  SchreiberBike | ⌨  23:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grass or grasshopper 
Talk:Tree warbler

message: western and eastern switched; Hippolais opaca is the western olivaceus warbler = Isabelline warbler, Hippolais pallida is the eastern olivaceus warbler. See the page for "olivaceus warbler", and reference works such as Borrow & Demey, Birds of Western Africa Morphophonosyntax (talk) 20:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

message: Is it time to protect this article against editing by anons? For some reason (can anyone enlighten me?) someone keeps inserting the word "horny". This has been going on for months, and it's getting tedious. SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 18:02, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's bizarre isn't it. Semi-protection seems like the sensible solution. SP-KP (talk) 18:08, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been going on for almost three years. The earliest instance of this specific vandalism occurred in May 2007! SNALWIBMA ( talk - contribs ) 18:33, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

text: OK, request now added. SP-KP (talk) 10:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  The joke is that is isn't a joke!  Have you ever seen these little buggers? They are!  It is an inside joke and is in some other pages and some other sites.  Bets are made on how long some will go undetected.  One inserted word, not 'horny' in this case, but just as bizarre, has been undetected on wiki for over three years, and that is really funny!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.130.118.95 (talk) 02:53, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, now it won't show even if you try it again. GedUK  11:46, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

text: No, not on this page at least...12.130.119.14 (talk) 21:53, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial protection?
Category talk:Cuban music history

message: As soon as I saw the huge number of articles (87!) that were listed in this category, I knew there was something seriously amiss. Sure enough, the great majority are simply bios of musicians from earlier times. Those all need to be cleaned out (with perhaps rare exceptions), and the category should be reserved only for articles that are about "the history of Cuban music". Cgingold (talk) 14:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misuse of category
Talk:CIELUV

message: What are the smallest and what are the biggest values for L, u and v?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.18.202.33 (talk) 13:03, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For what, spectral colors? Consult the chromaticity diagrams in the EL for u and v. For typical gamuts, u* and v* range from ±100 (Poyton, 2003, pg. 227). L ranges from 0 to 100 since Y<Yn .--Adoniscik (talk) 16:37, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range of L, u and v? 

message: I've reverted an edit that had identified C* and h as chroma and hue correlations; the previous version identified them as correlates. The latter is consistent with customary and accepted practice. Lovibond (talk) 17:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correlate/Correlation 

message: The link to chroma under Cylindrical representation currently takes the reader to a disambiguation page.  I don't know enough about the subject to make the link more specific, but I'd think that one of colorfulness, chrominance, or Munsell_color_system#Chroma would be the right target.  Scott Pakin (talk) 18:06, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: colorfulness is the right link, since that page describes (at least nominally) colorfulness, chroma, and saturation. –jacobolus (t) 18:55, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Chroma" link 

message: The transformations reference Y_n but it is never explained what this variable is. Can someone remedy that? Is it the Y tristimulus component of an XYZ white point (e.g. D65's Y=100.00?). Thanks! 174.252.49.198 (talk) 20:26, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Yn is the value of Y for the white point. The idea is that Y/Yn is in the range [0, 1]. –jacobolus (t) 21:00, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Y_n? 

message: In the line "The cylindrical version of CIELUV is known as CIE LChuv, where C*uv is the chroma and huv is the hue:[6]", doesn't the h miss a "*"? I don't have access to the original citation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OxygenBlue (talk • contribs) 20:41, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asterisk or not 

message: HCL currently consists of two halves: an un-notable crappy color space from 2005 (Sarifuddin) and a synonym for LCh(uv) that the statistics people just happened to come up with. It would probably be a good idea to do away with the 2005 color space and merge the rest here. Since it is more or less end-user information, some twisting of the sections will be needed.--Artoria2e5 🌉 03:52, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given no consensus for any action and discussion stale for 9 months. Klbrain (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge HCL