lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Beef shank

message: I don't know this and came to Wikipedia hoping to find out. I think this article is really more of a stub, but isn't labeled as such. I believe the average weights and measures should be included for a well-rounded article. The average weight with bone  as well as the amount of edible meat, which is very different. I'm not looking to suggest a cook's thesaurus, by any means, but when speaking about its uses this is something that shouldn't be left out. Don't you think? MagnoliaSouth (talk) 22:28, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing are average weights and measures.
Talk:Delmonico steak

message: this article seems to disagree on the cut used for delmonico - http://www.thenibble.com/reviews/main/meats/beef/glossary6.asp#ribeye Should that be used as well? --Derektumolo (talk) 04:04, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That link should be removed. StanlyKupp (talk) 01:04, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: (Untitled)

message: I still have no clue. The article says it is a method of preparation but only lists different cuts that are used. So is it a particular cut or a particular method of preparation?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.131.47.219 (talk) 00:30, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: yes this is my issue too, i wanted to find out what "delmonico style" is, not necessarily what kind of meat is used 208.100.172.164 (talk) 09:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. It's 2019, and there is still no indication in this article of what a Delmonico steak actually is. ParticipantObserver (talk) 19:27, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a Delmonico steak? 
Talk:Sneakers O'Toole

message: No real reason for there to be an entire article on this topic.  Sneakers was on for maybe 5 seconds.  Maybe this could be a part of a minor character list, but having an article is excessive.
I think we should bring this article back. After googling Sneakers O'Toole, he seems popular enough to have a wiki article pointing out that the character is not a reference to anything in particular.
dj_ansi (talk) 09:15, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Flap steak

message: The picture provided is most certainly a picture of a whole inside skirt steak (IMPS/NAMP - 121D), NOT bottom sirloin flap meat.  Flap meat is not that long unless you have some sort of mutant 25-foot long steer.
Sqwertz (talk) 02:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thomas T. Crittenden Jr.

message: I have changed the link that pointed to Missouri State University to the University of Missouri. It is clear that is the school intended as the present day Missouri State University did not yet exist. “Missouri State University” was a common name for the University of Missouri in Columbia, Missouri around late 19th and early 20th century. --Engineerchange (talk) 14:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Missouri
Talk:South Korea national rugby union team

message: This article needs improvement, since Korea is the second best team from Asia in rugby.81.193.214.133 (talk) 01:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Expansion

message: The IRB refers to them as "Korea", however they are no such thing, since they only represent South Korea, and North Koreans would not be allowed to play for the team.--MacRusgail (talk) 11:41, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Yes they are South Korea...

message: I have the following matches in my notebook for season 1987–88, unfortunately I don't have any references so can't put it on the main page.
* 3 December v Cambridge University Old Boys  Lost  36 – 41
* 6 December v Cornwall  Lost  13 – 39  at Redruth.  Attendance 2000
* 9 December v Combined Services Lost 13 – 35  at Aldershot
* 13 December v Public School Wanderers  Won  29 – 22  at Old Deer Park, Richmond
* 16 December v English Students  Lost  10 – 23 at Wasps
Jowaninpensans (talk) 19:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: South Korea tour to England, 1987
Talk:Leigh and Leslie Keno

message: The article needs to be cleaned up of grammatical errors Qewr4231 (talk) 20:16, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammatical Errors
Talk:Spencer W. Kimball Tower

message: The info in this article is outdated, since the construction of the JFSB absorbed most of the College of Family, Social Sciences. --Eustress (talk) 03:30, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that anthropology, psych, neuroscience, geography, poly sci are still mainly housed in the SWKT.  I know I have labs and offices in both, but what do you mean here - classwise or officewise?  If I'm not mistaken most of the College is still in the SWKT.  The JFSB does have a lot of family, home, social science stuff, but I think foreign language, literature and english take up most of the JFSB and those aren't in the college of family home and social sciences...  Chupper (talk) 23:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Oh yes, and the college offices themselves are still located in the first floor of the SWKT. Chupper (talk) 23:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated
Talk:Principal axis theorem

message: Wikipedia is not a textbook.  I think that section needs to be cut severely.--345Kai (talk) 03:54, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree.  It might be better to give a more general statement of the result first. then have sections discussing 2D exmaples, 3D examples, and broader generalisations. Jheald (talk) 15:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on Motivation? 

message: Should the theorem be the "principal axis theorem" or "principal axes theorem" ?
Google shows a moderate preference for the former, both in general search results, and also in Google book and Google scholar searches.
On the other hand, I was first introduced to it as the "principal axes theorem", in the context of the three principal axes (plural) of the moment of inertia; and it seems to me that what the theorem discusses and provides is not just one principal axis, but the whole set of principal axes, so the plural form seems to me the more appropriate name, better describing what the theorem actually concerns.
I wonder if the singular form has come about by comparison with the parallel axis theorem, which in contrast does indeed concern the moment of inertia about a single axis parallel to a body axis.
What do others think?  Jheald (talk) 15:45, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In many important cases, there is only one axis that is special. That is, the problem has spheroidal symmetry. This is a common case in birefringence leading to the extraordinary ray. Or the moment of inertial of an American football. I suspect that it is common enough that principal axis comes up often in web searches, though the more general case is covered here. Gah4 (talk) 18:48, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Axis or axes ? 

message: A several-paragraph account of the history of theorem, through various stages of development, is given at the start of
* L. A. Steen, Highlights in the History of Spectral Theory, American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 80, No. 4 (Apr., 1973) (pp. 359-381) JSTOR,
recently reprinted in Marlow Anderson et al (eds., 2009), Who Gave you the Epsilon?: And Other Tales of Mathematical History, Mathematical Association of America. , p. 36 (Google Books)
Jheald (talk) 15:54, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Mathematics in unconventional ways to improve your spoken English skills and experience is not build 49.37.99.90 (talk) 11:54, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science
Talk:Ligase ribozyme

message: Under construction. Links and references will be standardized, and other sections pertinent to the other in vitro evolved ligase ribozymes will be added. Wgscott 03:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Under construction

message: I agree with the comment about the tone of this article.  Needs revision to remove opinions.
I would suggest removing the section on irreducible complexity.  I think this only detracts from the article.  Also the bond creation figure is rather flippant and not good to have in wikipedia. Sorry to appear negative, I think its great to get the ligase ribozyme article in wikipedia! Alexbateman 12:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of article
Talk:Array mbira

message: This should not have been moved unilaterally; I don't see any discussion proposing this. The official website exclusively presents the instrument's name in capitalized form. What has been done is akin to presenting the Chapman Stick as the chapman stick--incorrect. Badagnani (talk) 20:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unilateral move 

message: When exactly was it invented, and when was it released to the public? Badagnani (talk) 20:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date

message: There is no other manufacturer for this instrument at present. What genre should it be presented as?  Franis (talk) 04:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand your question. Badagnani (talk) 04:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there is only one manufacturer -- and they happen to have invented it -- I'd say that this Wiki article amounts to an advertisement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.249 (talk) 20:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe anything forbids there being a Wikipedia article for a product for which there is only one manufacturer. It has been used in a few well-known TV shows & movies, so I'd say it's notable enough. I've added some references. Hopefully the article won't get deleted again. Esn (talk) 09:40, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is appropriate for the array mbira to have a Wikipedia article, but the current article definitely reads like an advertisement for the most parts. 2001:14BB:420:158B:C14:6A0B:DA34:FE6E (talk) 22:57, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Unilateral Move

message: What year was it first invented, first built, and first sold on the market? Badagnani (talk) 04:51, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In this Facebook post, the inventor claims that it was conceived in 1984 and first built in 1985. I'm not sure if a personal claim on Facebook can be used as a reference in the article or not. Esn (talk) 09:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Year

message: "There is only one unimorphic planar system available on an instrument at this time, and that is the system used for organizing the Array mbira."
What about the Fokker organ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adriaan_Fokker  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.166.64.121 (talk) 01:24, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the only one

message: How is this supposed to work? Last I checked, an octave had 12 notes?
--2A02:8070:E284:B100:8D07:AE02:45D2:409F (talk) 19:25, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  120 Notes spanning 5 octaves
Talk:Phase-change Dual

message: It had been my impression that the "PD" drives had been CD drives that could also read/write some Magneto-optical disks. Having read about DVD-RAM the other day that those are different to MO disks because DVD-RAM are "phase-change", does this in fact mean that the PD disks weren't the same as, or otherwise weren't compatible with, MO disks either? --195.92.168.163 04:04, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then they can't be Magneto-Optical then. 86.178.9.171 (talk) 16:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

text: PD discs are hard sectored with concentric tracks like DVD-RAM and MO, but use a purely optical read/write method.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzybody (talk • contribs) 06:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magneto-opticals? 

message: I recall that this format was originally branded "PowerDisc" or PD for short but I cannot find information to underpin this. Is there any evidence for this? The Seventh Taylor (talk) 20:42, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember also what you're stating. In my freshman year at college, I recall needing to buy these "PowerDiscs", as the prof. called 'em in art class. Since I also saw a DVD-RAM logo on the drives, I just paid, I think, what? $50? Maybe higher than that, for one DVD-RAM disc that lasted 'til 2006, when I sat on it and cracked it. (Strangely, my first CD-R from 1994 also met the same fate.) Other than that professor, I don't see nor find any citations that calls it PowerDisc, either. BTW, the DVD-RAM was 5.2 GB double-sided, and I never had to buy another disc all during my four years of college (for art, anyways, still needed ZIP100s and floppies for other classes). Apple8800 (talk) 08:40, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Not sure, but the PD acronym and the logo were probably a given. I suspect they were forced to change the PowerDisc name in some trademark dispute. The Seventh Taylor (talk) 22:16, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

text: The dual may refer to the two states that phase-change media can have. (amorphous and polycrystalline?) The Seventh Taylor (talk) 10:07, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  PD acronym/brand name
Talk:McMurry reaction

message: It is unclear to me why user V8rik insists on reverting my edit. Clearly he knows more about wikipedia policy. I just though that I would correct a factual inaccuracy. The version V8rik reverted to states that the graphic is inaccurate in the main text. Is the factual inaccuracy even in dispute if the main text disagrees with the graphic? 
What V8rik labels as vandalism is simply me removing incorrect information. This is not a nuanced point, the "simplified cartoon" is laughably wrong. However, if incorrect information cannot be removed from wikipedia, errors will abound.    
My interest in "getting involved" are limited. But, I am left wondering, is this guy even a chemist?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.32.57.198 (talk) 22:28, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

message: I changed the picture of the synthesis of Feringa's synthetic molecular motor. The old one was wrong for several reason:
1) Some double bonds were drawn as single bonds, thereby destroying the aromaticity of the molecule.
2) Only one enantiomer was drawn for both the starting ketone as well as the product olefin, implying this reaction was performed with retention of the stereochemistry of the ketone. This, however, is not the case -- the product of the reaction is a racemate.
3) The McMurry reaction using TiCl4 was not performed on this exact molecule, only on structurally similar ones. I therefore chose to display the synthesis of the 5-membered ring molecular motor, which was published in 2003 in J. Am. Chem. Soc.
TommyCP (talk) 15:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New picture molecular motor synthesis
Talk:Bunny chow

message: "Bunny Chow" as a term pre-dates 1948; the Local history Museum in Durban has a reference from the early 1940s. I suggest that the Bania's preference for foods that had never touched meat was the source, as Kapitan's could serve a takeaway that was guaranteed meat free.
Grant McKenna 04:16, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Bunny Chow"

message: I remember sitting on the curb with my feet in the gutter enjoying a Bunny Chow, outside of a ubiquitous Greek cafe in Pretoria, South Africa in the '70s.  In those years it was a popular dish around the country, or at least in the cities.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.243.74.196 (talk) 18:59, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, food for real working-class heroes, indeed. Plutonium27 (talk) 23:45, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  And also in the 'Ou Transvaal' 

message: Is it made with rabbit meat? If not, what's the origin of the name? Mnealon (talk) 18:27, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rabbit curry?
Talk:HMS Basilisk (H11)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DD-15B-Basilisk.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: All it needs is an inline ref for the lead-in paragraph. LanceBarber (talk) 19:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Lead sections don't require citations if the material is covered in the body of the article. Parsecboy (talk) 19:59, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: B review
Talk:Dance in Indonesia

message: This article reads like a copy from somewhere else - so reference tag and suspicion it has been copied directly from a copyright source SatuSuro 12:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I made this article from what I remember of a book about Indonesian dances from Taman Mini Indonesia Indah (in Bahasa Indonesia), a book owned by Traditional Art Club in my campus. That's why the English translation is so horrible. Sorry... I will try to borrow the book again so we would have the legitimate source for this article.... Matahari Pagi (talk) 04:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

text: It is now 4 months since then and it is a mess still 
lack of WP:RS reliable source leave it at stub and low importanceSatuSuro 01:54, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?

message: It seems clear from MOS:DANCECAPS that dance names are to be lowercased, but I want to double check before moving pages.  There are a lot of dances at uppercase titles and that are uppercased in article text. (nb the names in this article the non-English words in List of Indonesian dances.)  If you care please discuss this here.  —  AjaxSmack  16:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are dance names capitalised?
Talk:HMS Beagle (H30)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: * Can somebody source a photograph of HMS Beagle
* Service history needs to be expanded, prehaps more on liberation of the channel islands which is her main 'claim to fame'  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fdsdh1 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: More Information needed
Talk:HMS Blanche (H47)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DD-15B-Blanche.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:28, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:John DeSantis

message: I formatted an opening sentence based on what was already there, then placed a cleanup tag.  I know from personal experience that there is a lot more to add, but lack the time and availability of credible sources to cite. Serious work is needed.  Please help. SteinAlive 04:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Why is there no date of birth? --FIPS (talk) 21:00, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: there is now.  PKT(alk) 00:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: :No picture (preferably standing next to some shorty who's a mere 6 feet tall)? Not even the mention of his height? 92.24.207.218 (talk) 07:56, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  So little info
Talk:Shi'er lü

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need attention from an expert? Hyacinth (talk) 07:54, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag removed. Hyacinth (talk) 00:24, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Expert attention

message: *Asiatic Society of Japan (1891). Transactions of the Asiatic Society of Japan, Vol. XIX. 
As stated in the above note previously added, the book does not mention the term "Shi-er-lu", thus I removed the citation. Hyacinth (talk) 08:22, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference verification failed

message: "Unlike the Western chromatic scale, the shí-èr-lǜ was not used as a scale in its own right; it is rather a set of fundamental notes on which other scales were constructed."
I'm not sure how this differentiates it from the traditional western scale. The western scale is not usually used on its own either, it's used to build the major and minor scales, or other modal scales. People do not generally set a piece of music in the key of the chromatic scale, and it wasn't until the modern era and atonalism that it started to be used on its own.<For some reason no signature or "preceeding unsigned comment" sign was here, so I, the DubleH, put this here at the end if the preceeding comment.>
Yeah. I thought the exact same thing. The trends towards modulation and modal mixture in the Common Practice period did lead to all 12 notes often being used in the same composition, and sometimes people play chromatic scales in music (i.e., play all the pitches between 2 pitches in sequence, going up or down), and in the twentieth century people started writing atonal music that doesn't stick to any scale more specific than the 12-note one and that sometimes tries to treat all 12 notes equally. However, these developments happened mostly after the Pythagorean tuning was replaced by other tuning systems, especially 12-tone equal temperament, and the chromatic "scale" is still MOSTLY used as you say. DubleH (talk) 23:20, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to western chromatic scale