Talk:Feminist literary criticism

message: The introduction is too convoluted. It's filled with information that shouldn't be in a intro. It's hard to understand "What feminism is"
61.3.126.215 (talk) 14:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this better?
"Feminist literary criticism is literary criticism informed by both feminism and feminist theory. Using feminist principles and ideological discourses, it critiques the language of literature, its structure and being. This school of thought seeks to both describe and analyze the ways in which literature reinforces the narrative of male domination in regard to female bodies by exploring the economic, social, political, and psychological forces embedded within literature.[1]
Its history has been broad and varied, from the classics of George Eliot and Margaret Fuller to other theoretical works by "third-wave" authors. In general, feminist literary criticism before the 1970s (the first and second waves of feminism), was simultaneously concerned with both women's authorship and the representation of women's condition within literature; including the depiction of fictional female characters. Furthermore, it was also concerned with the exclusion of women from the literary canon. 
With the development of more complex conceptions of gender and subjectivity along with  third-wave feminism, feminist literary criticism explores a variety of new routes, one of which is the tradition of the Frankfurt School's critical theory. It has further considered gender in the terms of Freudian and Lacanian psychoanalysis (as part of both the deconstruction of existing relations of power, and as well as a concrete political investment).[2] It has also been closely associated with the birth and growth of queer studies. The representation of women and its subsequent politics, being a more traditionally central feminist concern, has continued to play an active role in feminist literary criticism. Ergo, modern feminist criticism deals with those issues related to the patriarchal programming within key aspects of society including education, politics and the work force."
61.3.126.215 (talk) 15:45, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  An introduction that is not like the body of the article

message: Should this article be merged with Feminist criticism? They both seem to cover the same topic. Kaldari (talk) 20:13, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes -- whatever useful material has been added in the article on feminist criticism should be merged into this article (under the less ambiguous "literary criticism" title, since there might at some point also be other articles on, say, feminist art criticism and feminist film criticism).  However, on quick perusal of the new material, that article looks potentially unuseful to me -- it's garbled and reads more like a student's first essay on the topic than an encyclopedia article.  Much of the material may need to be cut or intensively reworked rather than simply merged here. -- Rbellin|Talk 20:17, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge with Feminist criticism 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Feminist literary criticism's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Spencer":
From Feminist Criticism: (Spencer, p. 10)
From Romeo and Juliet: Spencer (1967: 284).
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 00:38, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Feminist literary criticism]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Feminist literary criticism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150901143656/http://bcs.bedfordstmartins.com/Virtualit/poetry/critical_define/crit_femin.html to http://bcs.bedfordstmartins.com/virtualit/poetry/critical_define/crit_femin.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified