Talk:History of Grenada

message: Wikipedia's date 1782, quoted all over the Internet, is likely wrong: "In 1782, Sir Joseph Banks, the botanical adviser to King George III, introduced nutmeg to Grenada. " The island was not secured for Britain until the Treaty of Paris, 1783.  Should it read "Sir Joseph Banks, the botanical adviser to King George III, introduced nutmeg to Grenada; the seedlings were smuggled from Cayenne to St. Vincent. Nutmeg reached Trinidad in 1824, and Grenada in 1843. (Purseglove, 1968)" Quoted from The Virtual Field Herbarium. The reference is to J.W. Purseglove, Tropical Crops. Wiley, New York, 1968. Shall I edit it, or is the 1782 date a cherished bit of folk history? --Wetman 08:06, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Go for it - even if it is "cherished folk history" accuracy is more important.  Guettarda 21:29, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Nutmeg]] introduction

message: "U.S. citizens were evacuated, and the status quo was restored (though the previous culture has since been overlaid by U.S. influences)." Surely it's impossible to restore the status quo, since the status quo is by definition the current state of affairs.  Status quo ante, perhaps?
:It would actually be more accurate to say that constititonal government (suspended since 1979) was resumed. The governments between 1979-1983 had no real legitimacy other than that which comes from the barrel of a gun.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.226.193.82 (talk) 22:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Overthrow and US Invasion section

message: The supposition that Democracy was "restored" in that Nation State is not correct. Damotclese (talk) 02:57, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Democracy Restored 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.historyofnations.net/northamerica/grenada.html
*:Triggered by \bhistoryofnations\.net\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 15:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on History of Grenada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141022114709/http://forts.org/history.htm to http://www.forts.org/history.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:49, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified