Talk:Curling at the 2002 Winter Olympics

message: :Image:Rhonamartin.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:24, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Rhonamartin.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Curling at the 2002 Winter Olympics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060622162855/http://www.la84foundation.org/5va/reports_frmst.htm to http://www.la84foundation.org/5va/reports_frmst.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: A. The final standings for the curling events at the 2002 Winter Olympics (and also the 1998 and 2006 Winter Olympics) did not allow for round robin ties to be broken among teams that did not play a playoff game or a tiebreaker game. Such teams were ranked equal. The Olympic.org database confirms this: Japan and Denmark are ranked equal in the women's tournament. Great Britain, Denmark and U.S.A. are ranked equal in the men's tournament.  
Note: Teams which lost a tiebreaker game were ranked in reverse order of the tiebreak round in which they lost. Teams which lost in the same tiebreak round were ranked equal. The practice of breaking all ties began following the 2007 World Championships.  
B. While the total wins and losses in the final standings may be interesting to some, one needs to reverse engineer this to figure out what the standings were at the end of the round robin.  I would highly recommend having the round robin standings (with wins and losses) and then having the final standings listed separately (wins and losses optional). Joel225sp (talk) 03:19, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final standings