lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brewood

message: Why once a town but now a village? The answer to this question on the page would be nice.
Now a town. Hard to see how town becomes a village JoshuaIsTheFalco (talk) 22:34, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status 

message: The reference supporting the statement about Sian Reeves, has twice been removed, today. I restored it once, but per WP:BRD won't do so again without discussion. However, it's my understanding that references which are dynamic news sites should not be removed, even if the content if the linked page changes. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 18:00, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: Why the quotation marks. It's the Anglican church of St Mary and St Chad that dates from the Early English phase of Gothic architecture, not the two listed here. They are both Gothic Revival buildings from the Victorian period. If someone in the know doesn't clear this up, I'll research and document the churches in a few weeks.Sjwells53 (talk) 13:16, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Early English'

message: Why was the mention of the chess club and the link to the chess club's website removed?  The village does have its own chess club and the chess club has its own website.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.165.217.73 (talk) 01:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Brewood Chess Circle'
Talk:Interstate 80 in California

message: There's a project description from July 2022 that says the Olive Drive exit is to be permanently closed, and per other sources it's been closed since March 2021. It's still closed on the most recent Google Street View, and I don't recall seeing it open since. Is this official enough to make it a former exit? https://www.cityofdavis.org/city-hall/improvement-projects/richards-boulevard-i-80-interchange-improvements ForeverStamp (talk) 22:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Olive Drive exit permanently closed?
Talk:Marshall Field

message: Please.  Propagating an old wives tale about playing golf on New Year's Eve causing his death is just sad.  Unless one of the others in his golfing party also had/developed pneumonia, he did not catch it in this golf outing: much more likely that he caught it in a confined indoor space due to close proximity with someone who had it -- definitely not outdoors.
Nusumareta (talk) 07:00, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't actually say that the cold weather caused pneumonia, but does sort of imply it. I have cited a source for this. The same implication is in the source. Kendall-K1 (talk) 16:44, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exposure to cold weather causes pneumonia?
Talk:Tescopoly

message: I think this article is entirely one sided. It is about this organisation and what they believe about Tesco, but it should in some way (at least attempt to) dispute the claims. It needs to do this to balance it out (the way its phrased makes it sound like they're facts). And in case someone is thinking of saying it: Yes, I realise there's a request to expand the article, but this was mainly to encourage reaching a balance, then expanding it further. - RHeodt 16:26, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I created this, and I agree with you. The list of bullets was cut & pasted from their website, and does need editing for POV. Please feel free to do whatever you think needs doing SP-KP 16:36, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately I'm mainly an idea person, and wouldn't be the best for this sort of thing. Just to draw attention to it, I'm gonna put a note on the actual Tesco article. - RHeodt 23:06, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Article looks fairly NPOV - references to news articles are now cited, suggest we remove the POV tag, unless anyone can highlight particular parts of the article which are POV. --OscarTheCattalk 22:34, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I think it still sounds like their what they're calling for is absolutely neccessary. I think it would help if it had some comparisons to other situations (of companies who do not receive criticism for the exact same/similar thing) and maybe Tesco's responses (if there are any). BUT, that said if the majority want to take it off, go ahead. - RHeodt 16:44, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Perhaps we can learn something from the Stop_Esso_campaign article?  It adds details of Esso's response to such criticism.  We ought to include Tesco's response to accusations of monopoly here then, to make it less POV. --OscarTheCattalk 08:12, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I've added the advert tag as I think this reads like a promotional piece for this organisation. I have no problem with a thorough analysis of the dominance and possible ill-effects of Tesco, however this must be objective and balanced. The title is also totally unencylopedic. This discussion should be either in the Tesco article or under a more suitable title. Mark83 19:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert?

message: I have removed the NPOV and the advert tags and re worded the article so its less anti tesco but still gets its point accross. FireBadger 01:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed NPOV and {advert} tags
Talk:Torquay Boys' Grammar School

message: This could be a good project for an enterprising History teacher at this school (and no doubt others): encouraging pupils to do some resarch into school history, perhaps going through the archives, and contributing a decent, sourced article to the encyclopedia.  --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 08:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: The 'former pupils' category associated with this school has been nominated for renaming, along with all similar categories. Comments are invited at the categories' entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Occuli (talk) 15:22, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories for discussion: nomination of various 'Former pupils' categories
Talk:Crazy for You (musical)

message: I have tweaked this and changed the image "fair use" - but the synopsis is still far too long and the cast list too detailed - does anyone want to fix this???
Soundofmusicals 01:03, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup still required

message: Anyone else notice a few POV problems with this article?  Powers 13:47, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Some information should be added about this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.224.151.35 (talk) 01:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Broadway 25th Anniversary Showing
Talk:List of music conservatories in Italy

message: While not denying the usefulness of this list, it is basically external link directory, i.e., something that Wikipedia is not supposed to be. It also needs more oversight and maintenance to check for broken links, to check where conservatories now have Wikipedia articles and internally link to them instead. I have added the Wikipedia articles so far and removed the external links for them as they are now in those articles. I have also changed the city names where they have a standard English name, e.g. Milano→Milan, Venezia→Venice. It would also be considerably more helpful to the reader (and more encyclopedic) to list both the city and the conservatory's actual name, e.g.
:Parma – Conservatorio di Musica "Arrigo Boito" not simply Parma. 
Over the coming weeks, I plan to gradually go through this list and format it accordingly. Voceditenore (talk) 23:44, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: October 2010
Talk:Anna Moffo

message: ... is that nearly everything Moffo recorded (before the problems with voice) is in a category per se, and is NEVER matched by other singers, either of her time or later (disregarding their 'celebrity status').
There was no media coverage (or shopping frenzy) following her death, as in the case of Callas, or some other singers, this is regrettable but ... huh... media, just like our momentary bothers, don't make the history. This may be regarded a 'fan posting', but i have a different point. 
Allowing that 'pleasing to the ear' is very subjective measurement, Moffo's natural delivery can't be missed, especially in comparison with other (celebrated ) recordings. The beauty speaks for itself; of it doesn't, in the art of music, there are measurable things, such as accuracy (music, tempo...), diction, etc. Regarding the poor state of singing nowadays, in the world generally, I think, Anna Moffo should be made a much bigger role model for aspiring singers. Her singing technique, reasons for the loss of voice (especially if they come out of the technique), and   e v e r y t h i n g   related to her singing, should be (much, much!) closer studied. That way, the world would become a better place for heaving her!
Branko B.
Sydney  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.187.65 (talk) 12:42, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What this wiki and NYT obituary do not say ... 

message: BBC Radio 3 aired a programme a few months ago about poor-quality and poor-taste classical recordings.  It cited La Moffo's RCA Thais as being notoriously disastrous, frequently off-key, underpowered  and consequently very patched-together. The extracts played certainly bore this out. The programme suggested that its release was somehow the result of nepotism but that, ultimately, it did the diva no favours.  Indeed, the impression conveyed was that it sullied her reputation and made her something of a laughing stock in the recording industry subsequently.  I haven't been able to track down the programme yet and can't supply any supporting references, so I'm gossiping, I suspect, in Wiki terms here, but does anyone have any further information? Bhasi23 (talk) 12:08, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thais recording 

message: So, she suffered an unrecoverable from breakdown in 1968? or 1974? Both dates are given.Gimelgort (talk) 18:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breakdown
Talk:Edith Ingamells

message: Can someone post the Edith "Judy" Ingamells article, as I don't see it in Google news. 131.96.14.93 16:46, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can someone please provide publication name and date for this obituary?  --Muchness 01:44, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --Muchness 03:42, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Refs
Talk:Payload

message: "It's mainly used at computer virus, worm, or computer exploit. The term payload doesn't define if the information makes any sense."
This doesn't make much sense. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Xlq (talk • contribs) 19:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "I'm making this all into the single phrase "computer exploit", as viruses and worms are both computer exploits.Rmsuperstar99 23:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...virus, worm, or computer exploit..." doesn't make sense 

message: Would it not be better to have payload on the x-axis and range on the y-axis?  - Arrivisto (talk) 11:18, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: For what reason? Isn't it more likely that an aircraft operator would look up what payload can be transported over a set range (e.g. between 2 airports) than the reverse? DexDor (talk) 22:22, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The payload vs. range graph 

message: I checked the source given in this section for the specs fo ATV :  . I realized that in the launch configuration section on the upper left part of pdf; it's written as "Payload Envelope :  8 racks with 2 x 0.314 m3 and 2 x 0.414 m3 each 1.146 m3 in front of 4 of these 8 racks".  In the wiki page however, it's written as 
Payload: 7,667 kg 8 racks with 2 x 0.314 m3 and 2 x 0.414 m3;    Envelope: each 1.146 m3 in front of 4 of these 8 racks.  So the information is broke into two separate line in the wiki page. I will fix this. --Guyver (talk) 10:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example for Automated Transfer Vehicle 

message: Nemidonam Mohammad amiri (talk) 22:59, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  telgeram
Talk:Theodism/Criticism Discussion

message: On 27, Jan, 2006 User:Earl Rezner added a sub-section called Criticism to the Theodism entry.  This is the user's only edit, as of 17:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following content was added to the Theodism article on 27, Jan, 2006 by User:Earl Rezner
The main distinction between Ásatrú and Theodism, is that Ásatrú is primarily interested in reviving the ancient religion of the Germanics, while Theodism views the feudal social construct as integral to being able to practice the religion at all. Theodsmen often attempt to recruit new members by joining Ásatrú groups, a practice which is often viewed as a conflict of interest and destabilizing to the Ásatrú movement. For example, the leaders of the Gering Theod, the Miercinga Ríce and the Normannii Reik all currently, or have been in the past, Elders in the Troth.
Theodism has been criticized for being very cult-like and attempting to revive institutions and practices like feudalism which are seen as counter-productive or even backward in modern times. A few of the more controversial practices are:
*Caste system: One thing held in common by all Theodsmen is the institution of arrungs or castes based on the Dumézilian tripartite system and the concept of sacral kingship.
*Thralldom: In most instances, the only way to join a Theodish group is to offer oneself into symbolic thralldom or slavery, and swear a hold oath to a Theodsman of a higher rank. Thralls have no rights, and therefore the potential for abuse is great. Thralls are publicly ridiculed, and made to sit on the floor at gatherings amongst other debasing things. In the past, individuals who have attempted to leave Theodish groups have been refused dismissal, or to practice freedom of conscience and leave without threats or harassment. Even when leaving on good terms, they are often set wretched or outlawed which is an archaic practice of civil death and disassociation which has connotations of being a criminal.
*Animal sacrifice: Theodish groups routinely conduct blót or ritually slaughter livestock.
*Dueling or holmgang: Some Theod groups advocate dueling or ordeals as a form of  non-secular dispute resolution.
*Sexism: Certain positions in many Theod groups are gender specific. In many instances, women - and only women - are utilized to ritually serve alcohol to men during symbel. Few women hold leadership roles in Theodism.
*Xenophobia: Most Theod groups are extremely insular, and do not see anyone outside of their group as having luck, honor or worth. Theodish groups are often antagonistic with other Theods over doctrinal differences or perceived insults, often resulting in protracted feuds. 
====Notes====
*:  O'Halloran p.31
*: Call An official of the Normannii Reik challenged the leader of the Miercinga Rice to a duel on 01/24/2006
*: Knowest How to Blot The how and why of Heathen sacrifice
===Criticism section as of 17:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

text: On 17:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Archival of criticism section

message: :On 17:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism section as of 17:01, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ford River Rouge complex

message: This article needs to include content about its WWII war production activities.  Could someone who has knowledge of this add it?  --rogerd 16:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWII activities 

message: I'm a bit baffled by the lat/long coordinates in all of the map & aerial photo links.  I believe the point specified in the links is at the US Steel plant in Ecorse, not the Ford River Rouge plant in Dearborn. 64.112.202.93 15:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. I've updated them. older ≠ wiser 15:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps and aerial photos 

message: I'm surprised how little there is about current operations. From the F150 Wiki page I'm lead to believe that all F150's are produced in Kansas.
Also there are several facts delivered in the past tense that I believe are still current, and should be present tense.
Leovenous (talk) 20:27, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Operations 
Talk:Lespwa

message: lespwa is the "radical wing" of lavalas?  i disagree, please cite some sources.
Macho Philipovich 17:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Prime Minister of Rwanda

message: "Hutu" is not a party.  Though ethnic affiliation is important, I don't think it should be presented in a column like this especially when every entry would be the same.  If we can't replace "Hutu" with the actual party affiliations of the prime ministers, then we should remove the column. --Saforrest 17:20, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:50th Space Wing

message: Could a blazon of the arms be provided?  --Daniel C. Boyer 17:21, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Pmsyyz 18:53, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: What, if any, support is there for the 50th Fighter-Bomber Wing emblem with a griffin on a cloud holding lightning bolts and an olive branch?  Maurer, Endicott, Ravenstein and Robertson seem to agree on the following:  The current emblem (in slightly different form, since the group was an Army unit - see 50th Operations Group) was first approved on 9 January 1942 for the 50th Pursuit Group.  That emblem was approved for the 50th Fighter-Bomber Wing in its current form on 15 July 1953 (six months after wing activation with that name).  On 23 August 1956, the emblem including a nuclear cloud was approved to replace the original emblem and continued to be used by the 50th Fighter-Bomber Wing and 50th Tactical Fighter Wing until inactivation in September 1991.  Six months after reactivation as the 50th Space Wing, the wing returned to its original emblem.  There seems to be little if any opportunity for the "50th Fighter-Bomber Wing" to have used this emblem in addition to the two emblems the official record indicates were approved for it.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 12:56, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The Saunders reference uses the emblem in the first page.  It also has the emblem on page 7, but says notheing about its adoption.  It shows the 1956 emblem on page 11, along with a discussion of the emblem symbolism, but treats it as the "50th Tactical Fighter Wing emblem" although the wing was still a Fighter-Bomber Wing in 1956.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: 50th Fighter-Bomber Wing emblem
Template talk:Israel Defense Forces

message: I translated the Hebrew template except two links:
#Terms of Israel Security (I think that you don't have equivalent project)
#Acronyms at Israel Defense Forces (This article will be very strange at English...)
All links in this template at Hebrew Wikipedia are blue except the "Military Court of Appeals".
Although I use the Israel Defense Forces article and the official website, some of the translation may be wrong and all of them should be checked. Troll Refaim 17:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

message: This template is huge:  I came across it used on a two-line stub, where the effect is, needless to say, rather excessive.  Surely there's a more sensibly hierarchical way of structuring essentially the same information, without the overkill "single template with everything" effect.  Alai 06:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we can make it much smaller by removing words such as 'corps' from the template. I mean, from the section headers it's already clear that it's a core/wing/whatever. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 10:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a tad large?
Talk:Samarkand Kufic Quran

message: This article ignores the Shi'a view of the Qur'an. --Striver 15:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Totally disputed

message: :: The Uthman Qur'an (also referred to as "Osman's Koran") is a manuscripted copy of the Qur'an considered to be the oldest in the world and said to still have a stain of blood from the assassination of the third Caliph, Uthman ibn Affan.
:: It is currently held in the library of the Telyashayakh Mosque, in the old "Hast-Imam" area of Tashkent, Uzbekistan, close to the grave of Kaffel-Shashi, the 10th Century Islamic scholar.
CMIIW, AFAIK, the Quran in Tashkent was a copy, not the original. And it was also disputed by the fact some of the page was changed (probably in attempt of renovating). Kunderemp (talk) 07:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Shouldn't it be a copy

message: The following link may be useful: . MP (talk•contribs) 17:21, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful info 

message: Since there is not enough evidence that this copy belongs to Uthman; the third caliph, therefore it is more appropriate to call it: Samarkant or Teshkend Manuscript  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kushsinghmd (talk • contribs) 00:18, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of article

message: Is there any scholary references about the information mentioned in the article, other than the Journal article, which is not considered to be a reference Kushsinghmd (talk) 00:24, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References and Evidence 

message: I took out the words that said "1/3 of the text remains" because, if the fragment runs from Surah 2 to Surah 43, it contains more like 2/3 of the Quran, because the low-numbered Surahs are generally much longer than the high-numbered ones. —Wegesrand (talk) 17:10, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How incomplete? 

message: if it only contains roughly a third(from Surah 7 to Surah 43) of the Quran(Cairo 1924 version)?
46.93.241.249 (talk) 21:56, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do you call this version a quranic manuscript....
Talk:Jaguar warrior

message: Added link to Jaguars in Mesoamerican culture. - Kevingarcia 17:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link added

message: The Eagle warrior article says more about Jaguars than this article. Merge them? Danlibbo (talk) 06:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, they should be merged, especially since jaguar and eagle warriors served the same role in Aztec society afaik. Bigdan201 (talk) 18:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity & merging with Eagle_warrior 

message: Will add two citations to a section with no citations.Juliangolden (talk) 16:53, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing article for class at library
Talk:Harstad

message: -- Just wondering --
Why is there no mention of Tore Hund?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbie76 (talk • contribs) 04:53, 07 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Enchant (band)

message: This article needs major revision. As it is, it reads like a magazine article rather than an encyclopedia entry.Kouban 17:28, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm realy sorry for the copyright problem, I didn't know that writing a copyright article is against the law. I will write a new article. Again, sorry. Aeternus 13:15, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some words of the autor of this article

message: This text is in the "Temporary Subpage". You can find the facts about Enchant at www.theoasis.cc. They are an international rock band. Aeternus 16:25, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I have writen an original text
Talk:The Unit

message: Does anyone know if there will be a season 5 by anyone. Its such a amazing series!!!!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.100.140 (talk) 18:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 5 

message: The awards / nominations and crew sections don't belong on Wikipedia, at least not in their current state.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomm007 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did Wiki become IMDB? 

message: Does the cast table really need to be stretched out and made hideously large with all the superfluous information regarding alternate callsigns of the operators? Having their widely used callsigns should be more than sufficient, and would streamline this section considerably.
Tomm007 (talk) 19:03, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate callsigns