lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Turbo-compound engine

message: This title is grammatically incorrect, it should be Turbo-compounded engine, or perhaps turbo-compounding or even turbocompounding.
Perhaps these should all be created and refer to one? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jontw (talk • contribs) 14:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: "Today it's used on a few modern diesel engines"
I don’t know the facts and figures but perhaps you need to look at the following link:
http://www.scania.com/news/events/archive/2002/iaa_2002/ev_pr_11193.asp
15,000 is not a few to me for 2004. From 1994 to 1997 I believe Scania manufactured 1500 turbo-compounded engines however I am still trying to find my reference for this figure. 
Perhaps an article on Scania with a section on their turbo-compounded engines with a cross reference from here.
There is very little information on the public domain for the turbocompounded Volvo engine, more information on these engines would be much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jontw (talk • contribs) 15:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of compound engine produced 

message: I tried the majority of links (Oct 2017) and they are dead, defaulting to website index page. No current equivalent pages did I find (general dumbing down of internet sites, losing information because of cost of remapping when giving a facelift or new template to site, having much less qualified web design people these days, making the entire site "mobile friendly" without links to legacy site or pages). Whinestein (talk) 10:25, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  most of the footnote links are dead
Talk:Petty Island

message: I thought it should be "Pettys Island" that's the misspelt version instead of "Petty's Island" (since the name of the namesake was "Petty"), but hey, past generations used to spell in weird ways... :) Resurgent insurgent 00:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the maps I have refer to it as "Pettys Island". Chubbles 00:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No mention of Venezeula???  90.214.234.59 (talk) 10:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Petty's" misspelling?
Talk:Balance (metaphysics)

message: :"In the real world, unbalanced stronger forces tend to portray themselves as balanced, and use media controls to downplay this, as well as prevent weaker forces from coming together to achieve a new balance of power."
What does this mean and can we have examples? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.238.78.4 (talk • contribs) at 15:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unbalanced stronger forces

message: As it turns out, life is the search for balance in all things... StopVandalsNow 11:21, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  life...
Talk:Chattr

message: Hi! Excuse me, how can it be that 
+i is to set the immutable bit to prevent even root from erasing a file.
 if man page of the command says:
A file with the 'i' attribute cannot be modified: it cannot be deleted or renamed, no link can be created to this file and no data can be written to the file. Only the superuser or a process possessing the CAP_LINUX_IMMUTABLE capability can set or clear this attribute.
I think that's a bit misleading: can someone explain it (even to me) better?
--Janesconference 15:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Río Piedras massacre

message: I wanted to higlight, about the Tydings project, the whole thing about Puerto Rico not having "economic conditions" for independence is not an objective claim, but political propaganda. Such a claim follows from Muñoz Marin's political views, and the article should reflect that. His opposition, redundantly, opposed his handling of the situation, and there was debate over it. So the reason Muñoz's party opposed it was due to their own, subjective ideological emphasis rather than objective criteria. -- a puertorrican  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.50.157.42 (talk) 17:43, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tydings project

message: One thing that is unclear is whether the Nationalists killed at the university were students there? The discussion covers student unrest, but it is ambiguous as to the status of the men killed. Similarly, were the two cadets who killed the police chief also students at the university?Parkwells (talk) 03:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationalists and students?

message: Added that in December 1935, Albizu Campos withdrew the Nationalist Party from electoral politics - until American rule ended.Parkwells (talk) 00:36, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies, but I am deleting this edit.  The addition states "Due to the massacre..."  I am unable to find any source that supports this contention.  In fact, most sources seem to point to a decided lack of popular electoral support for the Nationalists as the reason that Don Pedro chose to withdraw from the electoral process. Hammersbach (talk) 04:06, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: As a person who has continuously studied the historical events that involve Puerto Rico and its people, I too agree with Hammersbach. I have not found any evidence that this single event convinced Albizu Campos to withdrew the Nationalist Party from electoral politics. I believe that Albizu Campos took into account various factors which combined lead him and the party leaders to withdrew the Nationalist Party from the electoral process. Tony the Marine (talk) 00:45, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Aftermath
Talk:CRT

message: :Older technology CRT suffer screen burn-in, though not as quickly as Plasma displays. However nothing recent allows burn-in, nothing since the early 1990s perhaps before.
It is not clear whether the statement is referring to recent CRTs or recent display technologies. However, some newer technologies such as AMOLED screens have the issue of burn-in.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.14.228.130 (talk) 18:28, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Nothing recent allows any burn in

message: Casting vote: do not move. I have put cathode ray tube first in the list. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:22, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: CRT → CRT (disambiguation) — I've seldom ever seen "CRT" refer to something other than cathode ray tube. Who even types in "CRT" to find out about Chinese remainder theorem or the Chicago Rapid Transit Company? I see this as annoying to readers who want to read about the cathode ray tube display technology, which has a well known abbreviation but stumble onto a disambig page where they have to hunt for it under bunches of irrelevant things. In addition to that, after the move, CRT should then be changed to redirect instead to cathode ray tube. GraYoshi2x►talk 01:05, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Hugh McMillan (poet)

message: Talk page started.ReadQT 15:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Perylene

message: Perhaps instead of noting the problem with the chemdraw structure, the drawing should be changed to either the Kekule version or the Clar version.  Also, the article is incorrectly under biochemistry.
Rob82 15:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I changed the image of the structure drawing to a correct representation.  Hosikawafuzi 14:11, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The statements in the "Conjugation" section seem somewhat queer. They just describe how-to-drawing of the structure of perylene? I guess, the style with a round in the hexagnal would denote that the ring is incorporated in the conjugaton system, though the Kekule structure drawing would be better. Anyway, putting the instruction for how-to-drawing in this article seems rediclous. The sentence "...benzene should not be a benzene at all but just a simple cyclohexane" lead some misunderstanding or confusion about conjugation, since cyclohexane iself never make any aromatic conjugation. --Calvero JP 05:38, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you start with 5 cyclohexane rings in the same conformation as perylene, then make them all benzene rings, you get an invalid structure.  If you start at the center and make that a benzene ring, then try to fill in all the double bonds, then you end up with two carbons that are not sp2 hybridized.  The point of the molecule's existence is the fact that they are all sp2 hybridized so it's aromatic and therefore UV active.  That's why it's important not to represent the center ring as benzene.  That's why this image of perylene is not technically correct.  So, in that light, it is not ridiculous to mention this fact.  --Hosikawafuzi 13:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's true, explanation about the electron state of perylene is worth noting. However, current sentence may not be  appropriate. As you have mentioned, all the carbon atomes are actually sp2 in pelyrene molecule, so denoting the center ring as "simple cyclohexane" seems unreasonable, because cyclohexane do not contain any sp2 carbon. I guess it would be better to focus on the two bonds, which connect the upper and lower naphthalene parts, rather than 6-membered ring structure. A comparison between perylene and naphtahalene will be valuable, especially if UV and/or fluoresce properties are provided. --Calvero JP 12:41, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure Image
Talk:San Pedro River (Arizona)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Bilby (talk) 07:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Marcos Mousouros

message: The importance ratings are generally inteded to reflect the importance of the subjcet of the article to the discipline as a whole. For example, and article is of high importance to philosophy if "The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding philosophy." An article is of mid importance if "The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in the history of philosophy" and "Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand philosophy". I think that Marcos Mousouros does not fit these categories. Anarchia 21:50, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine with me. Deucalionite 21:11, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance rating
Talk:Winter of 1894–95 in the United Kingdom

message: Hopefully this is a better start for this article. It appears to be a significant weather event for the UK and should be cited properly. Spryde 15:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: September 2007

message: The article was moved because that winter was particularly harsh across the southern United States.  There needed to be more information within the title.  Thegreatdr (talk) 19:07, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article move

message: I have found some news sources which might be useful in expanding and referencing the article.  
*Gray River Argus (NZ), 1895
*New York Times (US), 1895
*Poverty Bay Herald, 1894 (NZ), which mentions 105 deaths in just 2 days of storms
*Hawkes Bay Herald (NZ,) 1895
*The Argus (AUS), 1895 again, this time in 1895.
*The Argus again, this time in 1940, mentioning the event some 45 years later
*The Graphic (UK), 1895, which includes a contemporary discussion about the relative severity of the weather
Wikipeterproject (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:High-redundancy actuation

message: The article got automatically classified as blatant advertising. I assume that this is because of the links attached. I can try to put all the information together on one page, and the only add one link to the article. I will also add links to related projects, as the research develops and as I discover more connections. But for now I think that the links given are indeed the most relevant.
--Thsths 15:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising?
Talk:O26 (text editor)

message: I have a copy of the source code for the SCOPE version of O26.  The name at the very top of the listing is none other than Greg Mansfield (who wrote a lot of CDCs early OS software), and is dated December 9th, 1967.  Dave Cahlander (another prominent CDC OS developer) added enhancements in the early revisions as well.  It is all written in PP COMPASS to directly drive the 6612 Operators Console.
I have now read the Irons paper.  He describes a completely different editor, which ran on completely different terminals (CDC 210s - specially modified with extra function keys), and is implemented completely differently from O26.  It also ran on IDAs homegrown OS.
--Wws 15:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's good - but it would be nice if there were some reference to point to, e.g., a published manual (even out of print) and a date.  The original CDC topic, by the way, cited 1966, which I thought referred to the Irons implementation.  (There often are dates cited in web discussion which I know to be incorrect - would be nice if Wikipedia at least can be made correct) Tedickey 16:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Documentation for O26 was hard to come by.  After all, it was an 'operators console', and programmers were not supposed to use it during 'production time'.  (It tied up a PP and a big block of central memory.)  So we usually used it during 'systems time', or for quick edits.  ;-)  The later KRONOS and NOS operating systems had a manual called the Systems Programmers Instant - which had a couple of (very small) pages documenting the O26 commands.  KRONOS came out around 1970 or so.  I am not sure where it was documented in earlier SCOPE systems, other than the source code itself. --Wws 17:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, thanks for the update.  I only noticed O26 because I was looking for information to describe the SED program (so I could see why it was listed as a historical entry) Tedickey 17:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, thank you.  I had never heard about the Irons editor before.  So that was quite interesting.--Wws 18:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who Wrote O26?
Talk:Tebing Tinggi Island

message: There's reason to believe that Rantau and Tebing Tinggi are the same island, despite the lack of citations in the former article. While the name 'Rantau' is elusive and I haven't managed to locate it in any publications, I've found several that do confirm the identity of Tebing Tinggi and include maps of it (which I've since edited into this article as references). With this information in mind, consider the following:
* The island identified with Tebing Tinggi in those articles matches the coordinates included in both articles (while these coordinates are different, they are only a short distance apart).
* Both articles mention Selat Panjang as the largest town on the island.
* The Spanish, Galician, Italian, and German articles all mention that Tebing Tinggi and Rantau are two names for the same island.
If the articles are to be merged, the article name Tebing Tinggi Island should be retained considering the publications from Indonesian universities that use this name. 146.169.201.28 (talk) 08:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Rempang

message: @Trooshc, opening this line of discussion on your reversion of the content to a poorly written one. Why do you insist on your version without attempting to collaborate, undoing the work of others balance the various points of view? – robertsky (talk) 02:16, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not undo the work of yours. Furthermore, it is important for you to be familiar with the timelines and real background stories before making such base-less and kinda absurd narrative. You even intentionally removed the original "uninhabited island" category tag of these article as if you knew the real situation and normalized the illegal settlements on these island. (Trooshc (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Trooshc The only thing I read at that time was about people rioting on the island. There was no mentioned of the state of the island on the article here as well, therefore the removal. I had left it alone after your expansion of the article. Your actions are clearly pushing your own narrative. – robertsky (talk) 10:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

text: And if you are wondering added the bit from the Tuhfat An-Nafis text, it wasn't me, but . See: Special:Diff/1175524140 – robertsky (talk) 10:49, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  On wholesale reversion
Talk:Hugh O'Donnell (politician)

message: * Liberal Democrat candidate resigns, BBC, 26 March 2011
--Mais oui! (talk) 21:16, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberal Democrat candidate resigns 

message: With regret I report Hugh lost seat on Central Scotland list this morning. 
Scottish election: Central Scotland list results - SNP and Labour win 3 seats each 
LIVE coverage: Scottish election
MikeBeckett (talk) 14:14, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent candidate not inaugurated 
Talk:Henry Astor

message: This article presents problems establishing notability. The subject is notable in large part from the success of his younger brother. It is obvious, however, that there was an interaction between the two that adds to the notability. Also, the level of notability of the family in American history would add some notability to the subject. What does anyone else think? --Stormbay 16:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:David Lewis-Williams

message: This article is a common knowledge biography of an academic and therefore does not infringe upon any copyright or patent laws. This article is also a work in progress and will be amended and added to in the coming weeks (including references, pictures and published work). 
Bmpdragon 16:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are grossly misinformed, this article is a complete copy and paste of  this article. That is a violation of the policies of Wikipedia, which were clearly explained on your talk page, had you bothered to read them. You cannot take anything from the Internet and respost it here unless you have been given permission to do so. Perhaps you should have read the information provided before writing your reply. If you want to write a biography about this man, then you need to start over. In it's present state, this article will be deleted. --Cyrus  Andiron 16:32, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for your contributions to this article on an interesting and important individual. Please read Wikipedia:Copyrights, however: It is not acceptable to simply rewrite parts of text you have copied and pasted from another website: You have to rewrite all of it. I have gone through the text, and removed everything that exactly copies the text from the site. This leaves the article a little thin, but it shouldn't be too much work to write original text based on the other biography without copying it verbatim. I've also categorised the article and wikilinked to ǀXam. Anyway, please do read Wikipedia:Copyrights and Wikipedia:Verifiability before continuing to work on this article. Thanks. -Kieran 21:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: @Cyrus Andiron 2601:196:4A00:6740:703E:D826:B992:732C (talk) 17:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please don't blank the talk page - it contains useful information. When it becomes too unwieldy and discussions have been completed, which doesn't appear to be the case at present, it can be archived, preserving it for future readers. Thanks --Kateshortforbob 15:05, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please don't blank the talk page 

message: : 
Is this criticism still valid?  There's been a lot of evidence substantiating Lewis-Williams within the last 20 years. Viriditas (talk) 08:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of criticism
Talk:Nestling

message: Please let the folks at Wiktionary know this is coyvio after you delete it here. Kappa 20:40, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 16:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-09-12 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Sorry, I don't know the protocol, but I fixed the copyvio.  Also, I think this needs to stay as a dab page because people might type in "nestling" to look for information about young birds or the novel.  (Maybe I should have redlinked the novel, but I have no idea how notable it is.)  —JerryFriedman 00:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My edits
Talk:Alaiye

message: Patrick! I should probably have sent this to talk page, but since you carefully watch over all that goes in and out of Alanya, you will certainly discover it. 
Please check this link . I can translate it if you want. It's about five -or three?- ships carrying food aid the Ottoman sultan Abdülaziz would have sent to Ireland during the Great Irish Famine and which were jettisoned in Drogheda. I see material for an article there, although this link is only a blog site and not very suitable for use in wiki. The only alternative I have for the moment is the section of an article in the newspaper Yeni Şafak :) []. But I am sure there is further information, perhaps in Irish sites. According to these two sources, this aid is the reason for which the coat of arms of Drogheda bears the crescent. We could envisage working on that if the subject interests you. Regards. Cretanforever 12:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, sounds interesting. If I can't get other sources, I may ask for a translation. I'll have some time next week before school starts.  I'm actually moving to Ireland on Monday so, yes, this is a confluence of my interests.  Thanks for the tip!--Patrick Ѻ 14:35, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Comment The idea of having this separate was to have a specific article on the beylik.  This is about the independent city state, while Alanya is about the city.  If you do want to merge it, please give it a cleaning up first, as the Alanya article is nice and tidy.--Patrick Ѻ 17:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand. I will remove the merger proposal. On Alaiye, could you help sort out what the sentence about the 5000 gold pieces is trying to say. You seem to have more resources on this subject than I do at the moment. Thanks. Aramgar 19:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Mandvi

message: About Vishal Thacker
Vishal R. Thacker is currently serving as Corporator in Mandvi Nagar Seva Sadan (Mandvi Municipality) and successfully served as Convener in Gujarat State BJYM IT & Social Media. Being inspired by the stories of great leaders of nation since young age, he has been also actively involved in various social and political activities of Bhartiya Janata Party. Ivishalthacker (talk) 03:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vishal Thacker (Youth Corporator)