lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Self-harm

message: I'm trying to bring this article to a state where it could survive a good article review, as currently it's nowhere near GA standards. Due to the widespread use of low-quality webpages as sources here, it's gotten by so far without a citation style geared toward paginated sources. For a few I've just added, I've used s, but I find in this kind of article usually s are the most straightforward to use to be clear about what verifies what. And switching to sfns is often a good way to visualize the citation structure of an article, and what issues it might have.
(Please note, I'm not criticizing anyone who's contributed to this article to date. GA standards have changed. Medical sourcing standards have changed. We just need to bring this article in sync with them.)  -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 20:22, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you  your efforts to help bring this up to current GA standards are much appreciated. I don't see a problem switching to sfn. Cheers Polyamorph (talk) 07:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

text: P.S. embarrassing looking back at my comments in the old GA reviews 😳 Polyamorph (talk) 08:04, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keeping this at GA; switch to sfns? 

message: Some things I'm taking note of as I work on this, in no particular order
# The first classification section should probably be merged with the signs and symptoms section, the second classification section, or both.
# Self-harm in popular culture should exist. There's a number of existing articles it could draw from, I think. Replace the "Awareness" section with a summary of it. But that's a whole 'nother project and I doubt I have the bandwidth for both that and this. Pinging Elli as someone who recently mentioned to me she was looking for a project. If someone writes most of it, I can probably find time for any parts about tattoos, an intersecting interest of mine. (Side todo, Cover-up (tattoo) should also discuss SH cover-ups.)
# We need a working definition, even if we acknowledge it's not the only definition. Based on what reviews I've read, I think we can justify something like the following, but I'd like to read more first: (ed. 06:07, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: N.B.: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Self-injury in popular culture was a thing, but I do not think would be an obstacle to a well-referenced, prose-heavy article on the topic. The deleted article was all xkcd #446-type stuff, and I'm thinking something more like Che Guevara in popular culture.  -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 23:52, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Todo 

message: not feeling loved , trauma , feeling constantly bad 2601:406:4200:12E0:1970:A4CD:9B0B:9F1B (talk) 21:34, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason people may self harm
Talk:List of Celtic musicians

message: Is this just people playing 'traditional' irish music, or music clearly inspired by folk music?
If we take celtic to mean artists from areas that spoke or speak a celtic language then this list should include all artists from: scotland, wales, cornwall, ireland, northern ireland and brittany. However I don't think you have Tom Jones, U2 or Westlife in mind. Secretlondon 12:40, Nov 2, 2003 (UTC)
I would think that this list should be limited to those artists whose major body of work is traditional or is clearly influenced by traditional Celtic music sources.  Celtic in this context would imply England, Scotland, Wales, Cornwall, the Isle of Man, Brittany, and Gallacia.  I say main body of work because some artists "cross over" once in a while. Just because you've recorded with the Chieftains, doesn't make you "Celtic".  Given that, I think that Sinead O'Conors presence on this list is problematic. David Stapleton 02:09, Nov 20, 2003 (UTC)
Planxty (Ireland) should be here, as well as Boys of the Lough (Scottish/Ulster). We should at least have a token Welsh presence - how about Ar Log? The comments above seem sensible, but I am struggling to think of any English band whose body of output is mainly Celtic. The only candidate I know is the High Level Ranters from Newcastle.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.114.111.42 (talk) 08:03, 11 August 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Subdominant

message: I have added two audio examples to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 19:48, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio

message: WikiProject Music Theory is spearheading a proposal to unify the layout of the scale-degree pages. The discussion can be found here. Since these pages not only include discussion of the scale-degrees, but also occasionally discuss triads and seventh chords built on these scale-degrees, it is important to systemize these pages. This will also curtail the creation of pages for each individual triad and seventh chord, some which may not necessarily contain enough content to be expanded beyond a stub. I invite you to comment on the proposal with thoughts, criticisms, or suggestions. Thanks! — Devin.chaloux (chat) 19:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to unify the layout of scale-degree pages 

message: The first pic reads: "Tonic and subdominant in C. C major and F major chords."
So, are there three tonic/subdominant pairs? Where?
The pic looks to be misleading, the description certainly is.  --79.223.10.247 (talk) 17:29, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Pic 

message: The Dominant (music) article talks about modulation to the dominant in one section. This article similarly needs a section about modulation to the subdominant key. I'm quite sure it is common inside certain songs, using this progression:
I, V of IV, IV, irregular chord (this irregular chord is commonly either a minor iv chord or a #iv diminished chord; sometimes it is even V of V, which is modulation to the dominant.)
In the key of C, this progression is C, C7, F, Fm or Fdim. (Note that C7 in the key of C major should not be called the I chord because it has B. It is the V chord of the key of F, and if you're using it in a piece whose home key is C major, it has to be called "V of IV". Georgia guy (talk) 00:23, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modulation to the subdominant 

message: Shell dzieci gwiazd sffaushehsikshshwhsjs
Zhyftk
Dawid.  363826.  Sgusgshst
Dr 85.237.178.222 (talk) 15:35, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dawid 55
Talk:Chapterhouse: Dune

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Buzzell (Dune). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 3#Buzzell (Dune) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:38, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Buzzell (Dune)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Junction (Dune). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 3#Junction (Dune) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:38, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Junction (Dune)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Suggestion to add to this article:  in the sentence with "to accommodate the all-important sandworms," maybe it could be added that the reason they are important is because they produce melange (spice). 173.88.246.138 (talk) 23:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion to add to this article
Wikipedia talk:Copyright violations on history pages

message: In the past I've had a discussion with admin User:Angela about copyvios in article revision history and what to do about them. Talk:Multiple_chemical_sensitivity
As I understand it now, we should not delete-n-revert articles unless there are no legitimate versions. If there are, then the article should not be touched unless a complaint is made about the past copyvio by the copyright holder in which case a developer could remove the specific version.
A page I am involved with has been suddenly deleted and replaced by the most recent revision on the basis of alleged copyvio in a previous version. The alleged copyvio was very many revisions back and the page has been rewritten multiple times since. From memory, the claim of copyvio was discussed, declared to be mistaken and never proven otherwise. (I wasn't involved).
Since the user who did this was an admin user (not Angela), I'm a little confused as to the current policy on this. Certainly I think that at least notification of the impending deletion should have been posted to the article or its talk page.
Zuytdorp Survivor 00:19, 30 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Which page was it? Have you brought it up with the admin concerned? Angela. 18:43, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I posted comments on the Talk page of the concerned page but it doesnt look like the admin has looked there. I'll post the question on his talk page. Zuytdorp Survivor 06:48, 3 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay admin user Jim Regan has decided that the above policy is the way to go and has decided to revert his deletions. See User Talk:Jimregan ("Melbourne International....") . Unfortunately he seems a bit stressed about it all. :-( Zuytdorp Survivor 23:45, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, see my reply. Take care. -- Jim Regan 23:48, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: GFDL & Deletion of Article History

message: i have a glasgow herald newspaper from 1733  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.97.45.38 (talk) 23:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: hi 103.121.218.15 (talk) 11:13, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  n
Talk:Affine representation

message: No qualitative difference between an affine representation and a linear rep one dimension larger? An affine rep has no zero while a linear rep has! For affine reps, we can only take linear combinations of the form aX+(1-a)Y while for linear reps, we can take any arbitrary linear combination! 
I might as well say there's no qualitative difference between an affine rep and a projective rep, just some minor detail about points at infinity of no qualitative consequence... Phys 20:37, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial comments
Talk:Frith

message: I moved the newly-added paragraph on "frith" meaning "neo-Pagan
augury" to a separate section; in light of the "revert wars" on this topic dating to 26
Oct 04, perhaps this whole secondary meaning should be moved to a
separate article. --Jdz 01:12, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have created a separate article named Frith (druidry) for the homonym used among neo-pagans. I hope this silly reversion war can end now.--Wiglaf 08:34, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved my discussion of "Gaelic frith" too.  I wonder if it would be appropriate to link to a couple of interesting pages on Germanic frith, written by neo-Pagans: Wodening, Hodge. --Jdz 16:16, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly doubt the scholarly credibility of those sites ;-).--Wiglaf 16:39, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: [PS] after having read them more carefully, I think that they can be linked to. Sorry about that.--Wiglaf 21:09, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: 1st, German Friede, Dutch Vreede and West Frisian Frede also "still" mean "peace. The article makes it sound like that's something uniquely Scandinavian. (Icelandic "friðr" allegedly means "love" or "peace".) It's just got lost when they started using the french paix instead. I'll edit that. 2nd, isn't "frith" a concept in modern asatru, as well? The page could elaborate on that. 惑乱 分からん 22:07, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Meanings

message: Someone may want to make mention of the Frith Stool (image, web article, inscription, list of works), either here or in its own article. Aryaman (Enlist!) 14:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Frith Stool

message: I've changed the introductory sentence from "obsolete English word" to "Old English word", because obsolete sounds a bit weaselish, and "frith" is still used within Neopagan contexts at the very least.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.56.103.6 (talk) 16:24, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Obsolete?
Talk:Caerphilly Castle

message: ----
This site credits the 4th Marquess of Bute with remodeling Caerphilly Castle.  Given that he was born in 1881, any such work would probably have been done in the 20th century.  Perhaps earlier Marquesses also contributed to a lesser extent.  -- Ortonmc 22:44, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)

message: There probably could be some mention of Doctor Who or the Tardis on this page given this  photo, I presume the Castle has been used in filming at various times so could probably get a small section on that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by EdwardLane (talk • contribs) 21:56, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't see anything encyclopedic about this. FruitMonkey (talk) 22:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctor Who's Tardis and Caerphilly Castle 

message: The introduction claims that the castle “is the second largest castle in the United Kingdom”.
(A reference is given but to a book with no way of verifying the specifics of the statement.)
I was suspicious since it doesn’t obviously look to be the the second largest “castle” (noting that defining what is meant is not trivial) and sure enough the article later makes clear that it is the second largest *site*... which i would suggest is different to most people’s idea of largest castle (even allowing for structure vs wider structures and defences).
Can’t be certain of course but this looks to be a bit of local pride rather than an accurate encyclopaedia entry!
Better would be to say something like: “...the defences and system of lakes, dams and associated defences are extensive and the site is the second largest castle site in the UK [ref].”  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iainmacg (talk • contribs) 12:45, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second largest?
Talk:Algerian War

message: Since Algeria won the war, it would be a better idea to call it Algerian Independance War just like the american independance war Stoutstouta (talk) 14:59, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  From algerian ar to war of independance 

message: Maybe it would also be a good idea to talk  about the consequences of the Algerian independance : it resulted into the development of anticolonialism in Africa and Asia and the fall of France's IVth République: 
https://gwonline.unc.edu/node/11722
https://daily.jstor.org/algerian-war-cause-celebre-anticolonialsm/
https://www.britannica.com/event/Algerian-War Stoutstouta (talk) 15:03, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  the consequence of Algerian independance 

message: I haven't read Ganser's book. What does he say the role of Gladio was? The article doesn't mention it outside the infobox Prezbo (talk) 00:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gladio 

message: This war did not lead to the end of The French Empire, just led it’s decline. Leninistpython (talk) 01:57, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we change it
Talk:David Beatty

message: ----
Thanks for querying that appointment to the Admiralty before WW1 -- he was actually Private Secretary to the First Lord of the Admiralty when Winston Churchill held that post. It just goes to show that you shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet -- that duff snippet seems to have come from a BBC website! That site also says he was born in Cheshire, while another one claims he was Scottish, but nearly all the other sites I've read say he was Irish, from a family in County Wexford. -- Arwel 23:53, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Undercover marketing

message: *Words Spy - Roach bait
*Words Spy - Undercover marketing
*Undercover Marketing Uncovered
—the preceding unsigned comment is by Isogolem (talk • contribs) 02:14, 3 November 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: It looks like a lot of this was taken verbatim from http://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/05.12.04/marketing-0420.html . —the preceding unsigned comment is by 70.80.127.149 (talk • contribs) 03:01, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed.  I've removed the stuff and told Isogolem (the one who added it) on his talk page. —Simetrical (talk) 22:09, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, no, I don't plagarize.  Compare the submission date of my change (here) to the publication date of their article:  November 3, 2003 vs. May 12, 2004.  They plagarized us.   I'll send them an email based on unacknowledged copying without GFDL. — Isogolem 21:09, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Simetrical — I was upset that you gutted this article, that I worked quite hard on, without fully researching who was at fault or what parts were copied (they also lifted "Whatever the risks...").  Still, thank you (seriously) very much for taking the time to research it as far as you did and to notify me, so that I would be sure to notice it and could do something about it.  — Isogolem 21:58, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: This section regarding Canon cameras has no source cited. Where was the rumour mentioned?  Joyous! | Talk 01:20, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumour has it.... 

message: in opening para, it talks about how actors can market to their fan base, even if in viable locations. In "Reasons" right below, it mentions that celebrities cannot market to general public, and maybe only to other celebrities. Clarification is needed. I understood that it meant hired, masquerading actors only at second glance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.9.237.172 (talk) 09:33, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: discrepancy
Talk:List of people from Quebec

message: Should people like Leonard Cohen and Sidney Altman be on this list? I was always under the impression that Québécois were Francophone citizens of Quebec, while the term Quebecer described everyone. - SimonP 02:39, Nov 3, 2003 (UTC)
Since this question was asked, the problem has been solved by renaming the page from List of Québécois to List of Quebecers. - Montrealais
:I would like to think that English-speaking Quebecers can be Québécois. --Liberlogos 01:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Why List of Quebecers instead of List of Quebeckers? --Waninoco 09:26, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Both are acceptable in English. "Quebecer" is the Wikipedia standard. --Liberlogos 01:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubt 

message: Some people on this list died before Quebec became a province. They lived during the New France and Low Canada periods. Should they be removed? ---[unsigned post by User:BarLaf (Talk | contribs)]
:Of course not. Quebec is more than administrative legal boundaries, it is a homeland and a history. Quebec is the modern incarnation of Lower Canada and New France (or it's territory called "Canada"). Thank you for signing your posts in the future. --Liberlogos 01:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quebec 
Talk:Mecca

message: It should be semi-protected. holiest sight of the second largest religion, Islam Nurusa101 (talk) 01:24, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing to do, since no edit requested to this already semi-protected article. —C.Fred (talk) 02:55, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: , it is not semi-protected Nurusa101 (talk) 21:44, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind it is, then why is the lock icon not showing up on the homepage of the article? Nurusa101 (talk) 21:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Added appropriate Icon  Nurusa101 (talk) 21:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request 

message: I am requesting to add the Arabic name for Makkah in the Arabic script along with the Romanized translation. CPT78999 (talk) 21:33, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Please note the name already appears in Arabic script above the infobox. Jamedeus (talk) 21:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2024
Talk:Dennis Rodman

message: In the section mentioning Rodman's involvement in pro wrestling in lead, it refers to his two tags with Hogan at Bash at the Beach 1997 and 1998, but not his third PPV match against Savage at Road Wild 1999. Seems random, and would complete the section to at least mention his 3rd PPV match in same section. 130.45.24.168 (talk) 11:00, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Road Wild 1999 

message: Rodman's wrestling debut was actually at Bash at the Beach in 1995, assisting Hulk Hogan in winning the main event vs Vader.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.196.67.65 (talk) 02:32, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Bash at the Beach 1995

message: ===Films===
*Eddie (1996) as Himself (cameo)
*Double Team (1997) as Yaz
*Simon Sez (1999) as Simon
*The Comebacks (2007) as Warden (cameo)
*The Minis (2007) as himself
*Rodman: For Better or Worse (2019) as Himself 5.90.73.84 (talk) 08:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. User:CanonNi (talk|contribs) 08:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 April 2024 

message: *Eddie (1996) as Himself (cameo)
*Double Team (1997) as Yaz
*Simon Sez (1999) as Simon
*The Comebacks (2007) as Warden (cameo)
*The Minis (2007) as himself
*Rodman: For Better or Worse (2019) as Himself 5.90.73.84 (talk) 08:03, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. User:CanonNi (talk|contribs) 08:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Films
Talk:Jim Anderton

message: a good article, very well balanced and neutral.  ping 06:49, 3 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can be found here; they are Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. Schwede66 08:05, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Freely licensed images of his investiture
Talk:Rm (Unix)

message: Shouldn't this page mention that soft links are not followed if you select rm -r?  I know it is obvious that any sensible designer would design it that way, but for the paranoid among us (and this trait has been known to exist in programmers), wouldn't it nice to give people about to type it the comfort of saying so clearly and unequivocally?  <not signing because the signup doesn't allow underscores> —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.171.191.60 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 20 May 2007
: This is probably implementation dependent and the man page will surely clear up any such nuances of behavior.  --WayneMokane 14:27, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hrmmf! soft links 

message: We've been working on this for a while, and would this qualify for WP:MTR?  --One Blue Hat❯❯❯ (talk) 19:18, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of mantanence template.
Talk:Second Skin (1999 film)

message: Don't blame me! Poorly written, needs to be improved!! --FallingInLoveWithPitoc 11:21, 3 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page describes a Spanish gay film produced in 1999, per:
* Segunda piel (1999) AKA: Second Skin
There IS a film of the same name, produced in 2000:
* Second Skin (2000) AKA: Matadora de Aluguel
There are, it turns out, many films of the same name, per:
* IMDb Results for "Second Skin"
Clearly, this page needs to be renamed.  At the same time, various inter-wiki links need to be changed to ensure that it is correctly linked.  Also, since there is a film of this name released in 2000, then this page name should be available for creation about the South African film of this name.
Enquire (talk) 04:12, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page describes the 1999 film, NOT the 2000 film of same name