lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Battle of the Dardanelles (1656)

message: I wikified this page and tried to find as many relevant links as I could. Many of the links referring to peoples i.e. "Turks" are only approximates. The context of the battle is not very clear to the average reader (like me). 
Also, the same battle seems to be listed on some pages under another name. I listed this battle on the Dardanelles page. There is a disambig page also. KarenAnn 15:33, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: in the link to VENIVA's history of the naval battle of the dardanelles, different numbers and types of ships are listed. someone from the WP military history project should look into these differences. there's no project for present-day-greek-locations military history, so perhaps this would fall under italian and ottoman military history. 4.230.174.215 18:56, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differing Facts 

message: The article stated that the Turkish naval commander was Chinam Pasha. This is obviously wrong since there is no Turkish name as Chinam. The commander of the Ottoman naval fleet was the Captain of the Seas (Kaptan-i Derya in Turkish) Kenan Pasha. 17:46, 3 January 2007 (noyder) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.106.181.2 (talk) 17:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the Ottoman Commander
Talk:Yellow-eye mullet

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 02:46, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Eamon Broy

message: The politics.ie wiki has a fairly decent if unsourced article on this man, but I can't find any information about it's copyright status. Until that information is found, we can't use the material. I'll send an e-mail and see if that pulls up anything. Snoutwood (talk) 15:35, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See also Wikipedia talk:Irish Wikipedians' notice board#Politics.ie wiki copyrights and Eamon Broy. Snoutwood (talk) 15:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

text: When their is doubt copyright should be assumed. Djegan 18:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Indeed so, hence the revert. Snoutwood (talk) 06:58, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's worth pointing out that there is an incredible amount of material on the politics.ie wiki that has been lifted from this site without any attribution or acknowlegment.--Damac 11:41, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That wiki is run by and part of politics.ie and on their home page there is a clear copyright notice (bottom right), so we must assume the copyright covers all of thier site that includes their wiki too. Cheers ww2censor 12:52, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yep, you're right. Thanks very much! Snoutwood (talk) 16:03, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics.ie Wiki article 

message: "Neil Jordan's film Michael Collins (1996) inaccurately depicts Broy (played by actor Stephen Rea) as having been discovered, tortured and killed by the British."
In the South Bank Show documentary on the Michael Collins film, Neil Jordan states that the Broy character was actually a composition of three people rather than an accurate portrayal of Broy. 86.29.226.181 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 12:55, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film Fictionalisation 

message: I understand removing the nickname from line 1 but it was part of his identity, and public discourse, and surely should appear within the article (which it now does not, not once)..? SeoR (talk) 12:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears in the infobox. It it was "part of his identity", then should the article be moved to Ned Broy? Also, you could change the 'also called Edward Broy' to ' also called 'Ned Broy'. Spleodrach (talk) 19:12, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Let me think about that. It definitely needs representation (beyond the infobox, which should primarily fit the body text). Let me have a look at a couple of decent sources. SeoR (talk) 23:26, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ned Broy
Talk:Goanna fish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Spiny-back eel

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:30, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Fleshfish

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:22, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Grey brotula

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:13, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: I think "grey brotula" and "orange cuskee" would refer to the recently described species Bidenichthys beeblebroxi. B beeblebroxi was described, and E. consobrinus was redescribed, in 1995; in the article (cited in the beeblebroxi wikipedia article), Paulin refers to "the common grey brotula, here described as a new species [B. beeblebroxi], and Hutton's consobrinus...". In a [2006 paper], a different researcher referred to beelbebroxi as "Gray brotula" as well. So it seems like Grey brotula is now taken to mean B. beeblebroxi, or at least is ambiguous.
There's no official governance of common names, but I'd suggest renaming this article Bidenichthys colobrinus, with Gray brotula redirecting to B. beeblebroxi, or perhaps a disambiguity page.
Agyle (talk) 14:12, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article – "Grey brotula" no longer used for redescribed B. consobrinus?
Talk:Hairlip brotula

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 06:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Walt Harris (American football coach)

message: This article shows a lot of biases.
Firstly, Harris' successful tenure at Pittsburgh isn't mentioned at all including him taking the Panthers to 5 straight bowl games and a Big East title. 
Secondly, the comment about "worst coach in Stanford history" needs to be clarified. His winning% is the lowest in school history but he only coached two seasons. 
Finally, the "criticisms" page really doesn't belong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.94.199.110 (talk) 02:40, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wlat Harris. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 04:58, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wlat Harris" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Pink cusk-eel

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 10:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Pallid pearlfish

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 11:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Marv Levy

message: Actually I was looking for the Coors light commercial info - the "Play-off? .. You wanna talk about play-offs" thing here - guess I'm gonna have to dig that up somewhere. — Ched (talk) 15:57, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playoffs 

message: Who makes the rules for this stuff? Why does Walsh's tree automatically count as Levy's? 
I'm not against the inclusion of this section in theory, but as it is it seems arbitrary and not up to usual Wikipedia standards. Would anyone object to its removal if nobody can find a good source for it? Ninjalectual (talk) 02:04, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coaching tree section removal?
Talk:Steve Mariucci

message: Mariucci won't be MSU's HC, his agent announced it a while ago, and Izzo confirmed it.  
Epsoul 22:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  MSU HC Job 
Talk:Alepocephalidae

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 09:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Alpine galaxias

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Whpq (talk) 01:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Ayu sweetfish

message: There are two forms of ayu - amphidromous and land-locked.
Is land-locked form of ayu treat as a separate subspecies? --Kerry7374 01:40, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subspecies 

message: I have seen people in Japan skewer live fish by placing a sharpened stick into the fish's mouth, and then roast them alive. I have seen this in person and on TV, but this was edited out of my contribution because the person who did the edit said this is uncommon. Is this common or uncommon?114.161.229.100 (talk) 07:29, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Method of cooking ayu in Japan 

message: * http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11470442
* http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+Plecoglossus+altivelis+aroma&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.67.204.34 (talk) 07:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aroma component of the fish..... 

message: * http://baike.baidu.com/view/36143.htm
--222.67.204.34 (talk) 09:11, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links in the ''See also'' section are based on the following.... 

message: So, this article includes an image (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Plecoglossus_altivelis_altivelis_hami-ato1.jpg) with the caption "The trace that ate bait". There is presently no coherent explanation of the image. What the hell is it? Why is it in this article? The image should be either explained or removed. 70.209.83.36 (talk) 00:13, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. I just came in here to find out what the hell that was.The Japanese explanation just says "Signs that the bait was eaten."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.120.154.69 (talk) 21:26, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the caption. ―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 22:41, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What on earth is that image at right?
Talk:Battle Field 2

message: As of now (July 23, 2006) everything on this page is on the BF2MC page. I'm not trying to offend the original author of this page, but Airborne502 has a point, there is really nothing different about the PS2 version. The BF2MC page shows that there is a PS2 version, so it's not like this version is shunned or anything. Anyway, everything is moved, and this page has nothing else to offer that the BF2MC one does not. The merge wars have gone far enough on this page, and I am making this page a redirect to Battlefield 2: Modern Combat -werdnanoslen 21:41, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Battlefield 2: Modern Combat is the PS2 version of BF2. (3ucky(3all t/c 16:10, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I have to agree - Hunter91 - if you have anything to contribute, please contribute at Battlefield 2 and turn this page into a redirect so that those who are tooking for information on Battlefield 2 will go to the correct page.  To make a redirect page, just replace all of the content in this article with #REDIRECT Battlefield 2.  This may happen anyway, depending on the outcome of the AfD on this article. Martinp23 16:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Banded kōkopu

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 18:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: and also content from  – Sadalmelik ☎ 18:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Citrus Park, Florida

message: 28.078060  -82.570000
The following coordinate fixes are needed for CITRUS PARK.
—BRATT(BAM-IT) (talk) 21:17, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 