Talk:Sophie Germain

message: Hello, I need help with finding some pictures of Sophie Germains' home—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.183.232.205 (talk • contribs) 00:39, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for photos of Sophie Germains' home

message: "if x, y, and z are integers, and x5 + y5 = z5 then either x, y, or z has to be divisible by five. "
I think some conditions are omitted here. The nontrivial case has no solutions (see Fermat), so it appears to me quite meaningless to say that these non-existing solutions have to be divisible by 5. On the other hand, in the trivial case x=0 and y=z, none of them has to be divisable by 5.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.11.216.65 (talk • contribs) 06:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: in case you are not aware, the result known as 'fermat's last theorem' was not proved by fermat but by Andrew Wiles in 1995. therefore it was entirely meaningful for germain to prove that any possible solutions to x^5 + y^5 = z^5 must be divisible by 5 at the start of the nineteenth century. see Fermat's Last Theorem. hope this helps. Via strass 08:47, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Sophie Germain was born into a wealthy family and self taught herself from her dads books in his libary.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 199.164.68.202 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing conditions

message: We are told that Gauss's interests shifted to applied maths after 1808.
Actually, he studied non-Euclidean geometry after 1808.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.27.16 (talk) 09:51, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1808 

message: "Because of her gender, she was unable to make a career out of mathematics, but worked independently throughout her life."
If puritanism demands use of a social and cultural construct (gender) rather than the underlying biological determinant (sex) then so be it but neither was the cause of Sophie Germain's inability to undertake a career in mathematics. It was the prejudices of society, largely those of men, that denied her such a career. As a woman she was perfectly capable intellectually and physically to follow such a career, it was the physical obstruction of men that prevented her admittance to the relevant institutions.
Chrysippo (talk) 11:00, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's the point, it was just poorly worded, or perhaps poorly read. Boneyard90 (talk) 06:21, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Blame the victim

message: Petrovich 1999 (https://www.jstor.org/stable/30053914) states Germain won the prize for calculating Chladni vibration figures, and she was the only contest left. However, this link gives a different account, where the other competitors '.. prisoners of the ruling paradigm, consideration of the underlying molecular structure theorized for materials. The mathematical methodologies appropriate to the molecular view could not cope with the problem.' Jonpatterns (talk) 20:36, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chladni vibration figures award 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sophie Germain. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129202400/http://www.academie-sciences.fr/activite/prix/laureat_germain.pdf to http://www.academie-sciences.fr/activite/prix/laureat_germain.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:48, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article has approximately 7 footnotes (some repeated multiple times) sourced to Osen 1974. Osen was not careful about the provenance of her claims and cannot be considered a reliable source; see Talk:Hypatia for a more detailed discussion of this issue. Can we work to eliminate this reference and base everything on better sources, please? —David Eppstein (talk) 23:20, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osen unreliable