Talk:The Road Not Taken (Stargate SG-1)

message: Episode Style Sheet  
Following the plot summary, several (optional) sections may follow. These include:
    * "Quotes" section
    * "Trivia" section
          o Significance, discussing the episode's overall contribution to the Stargate mythology (character developments, shifts of power)
          o Trivia, adding some interesting facts about the episode that would not be appropriate for the introduction or summary
          o Controversy, if the episode is particularly divisive among fans or introduces an element that has met with a harsh fan reaction or that violates continuity (this could apply to Sam's boyfriend Pete Shanahan, for example).
          o This would also be a good place to mention if fans generally loved or hated the episode (use GEOS or Gateworld for this, don't decide yourself!) and why.''
This policy applies to other tv shows as well, so please stop deleting trivia or note sections.  And if you personally believe information to be trivial, unverifiable, or indiscriminate information then say so and ask the information be removed or integrated into the article if possible.  Mwhope 03:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That means nothing as a) It's not policy or guideline, b) Nor does it apply to other shows. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 08:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stargate SG-1 Episode Style Sheet

message: There is a temporary version of the article here: Talk:The Road Not Taken (Stargate SG-1)/Temp
Please provide a short summary. See WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE WP:FICTION WP:WAF and Wikipedia:Fair use. Proposed length: The summary in Pilot (House episode), balanced with at least as much-out-of-universe information. --GunnarRene 21:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While i agree this article needed work, particularly in the non-synopsis areas, the episode itself aired for the first time less than a month ago.  Editors must have time for sources to become available.  Please take this into consideration.
Mwhope 05:53, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've already told him he's wrong (didn't appear to listen) and thus he decided to make a point. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 05:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read WP:POINT before accusing people of breaking it. I used the appropriate process for copyright concerns. --GunnarRene 18:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

text: You need to button your mouth young man, before making heinous, unfounded accusations like that. You ought to check the article's history and you may realise it was GunnarRene who tagged this article as a "copy vio". thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 20:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I played no part, I did not write the plot section. Also no where did I mention the number twelve (or call you a child, for that matter). Also questions like "Why do one but not the rest" are called an argumentum ad ignorantiam, and to put you straight it certainly isn't just this one. I'm also wondering as to why you are rambling about "infringment [sic]", because I'm not interested if it infringes or not, my qualm about the introduction of trivia is that it is non-encyclopaedic (see WP:AVTRIV). thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 23:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot expansion

message: *This is Carter's 200th Appearance on Stargate SG-1
there seems to be debate on this point.  so i am moving it to here.  Mwhope
:Would tv.com be considered offical stuff, as they have it in there inormation section http://www.tv.com/stargate-sg-1/the-road-not-taken/episode/843963/summary.html?tag=ep_list;title;14 --WarDragon 16:43, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?

message: I have just removed 3 items from the notes section (about alternate Mckay, instrumental sg-1 theme, and Major Lorne) that was already in the production notes section. I figured we don't need to have the same information twice and if I removed it from the production notes section, it may make the section appear too small to be required, in which case it would be integrated with the notes section which I believe would make that notes section appear bloated. Doctoroxenbriery 16:37, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed duplicated information