lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Turkish passport

message: Montenegro does not require visa for Turkish citizens, however the current map does not represent this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.85.79 (talk) 04:21, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to this source it is very highly that visas will be abandoned between Syria and Turkey. So can someone edit it in the map?--Infestor (talk) 13:16, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syria 

message: In the first part, isn't the status of Turkish citizens living in Northern Cyprus overemphasized? Any turkish citizen resident abroad (including TRNC) gets his/her passport from the local embassy of Turkey.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.122.120.21 (talk) 05:47, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overemphasized status of Northern Cyprus? 

message: hello the photo you have of "current" turkish passport is outdated. i dont have a good pic but the below one is being issued now.
https://i.imgur.com/CitcjBw.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.35.239 (talk) 01:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  the picture is outdated
Talk:Benjamin Stone

message: Benjamin Stone is the only article using that title, and the most likely avenue to the Benjamin Stone (disambiguation) page is through that article, so, per MOS:DAB, that link goes in the introductory line and not in the list. If those other two Benjamin Stones (and/or any real ones that might emerge) get Wikipedia articles, then it will be the time to add a parenthetic clarifier to the L&O Ben Stone, and the format & sequence of the dab page would be adjusted accordingly. Until then, though, the page as it stands is correct. As for the other two current entries: each entry should have one, and only one, blue link.--ShelfSkewed Talk 14:42, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation.  Never too early in the morning to learn something new!  Unschool (talk) 14:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dab page format
Talk:Bert Breen's Barn

message: I have replaced some inappropriate data with the original publisher and date (Little Brown, 1975) and deleted other data that must be for that 1991 edition. The front cover image is better than nothing but we should know the edition.
Eric Sloane: illustrator? or cover artist or both? which edition? --P64 (talk) 21:10, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox data
Talk:Benjamin (Animal Farm)

message: Wouldn't he be exercising his reading capabilities when Alfred Simmonds had taken Boxer away to his death? He read it much faster than Muriel and that was before the seven Commandments were turned into one. No you twit only a five year-old would come up with that Muriel who can read quite well yells it to him he didn't read it everybodies an idiot. 
This article is about Benjamin. Those who have claimed he can't read are talking about Boxer. Benjamin can "read as well as any pig", but generally chooses not to help the other animals read until the end when Boxer is being trucked away. Muriel tries to read it but is too slow, and Benjamin pushes her aside and reads it aloud to the other animals.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.85.61 (talk) 07:56, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  His reading capabilities were better than most
Talk:Branchiosaurus

message: I was wondering, why isn't there a taxobox? Is it because Branchiosaurus is also thought to have been a juvenile Eryops? Giant Blue Anteater (talk) 15:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tom Bradley

message: Tom Bradley is a fictional character played by Gary Cooper in the 1936 film Desire with Marlene Dietrich. Don't know how many fictional characters, well known or otherwise, are appropriate for explicit Wikipedia reference. For example I see Tom Joad redirect to Grapes of Wrath. Rairden (talk) 04:44, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Spring Hill, Georgia

message: If you would like to know why I assessed the article the way I have, please use my talk page. Ethan (talk) 04:43, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: Spring Hill, Cobb County, GA does not appear on the GNIS and Google Maps doesn't show it.– Gilliam (talk) 02:35, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Spring Hill, Cobb County, GA really exist?
Talk:James Braid

message: : Not moved. Station1 (talk) 09:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: James Braid → James Braid (disambiguation) —  -- This is, in fact, a disambiguation page and, therefore, should be named as such. Lindsay658 (talk) 02:18, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:James Braidwood (disambiguation)

message: For accuracy, and to agree with a planned biography article about him (at the time of this writing, the link is still red, so it does not affect any existing articles). 24.178.228.14 (talk) 19:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alter description of mining engineer 
Talk:Harvard College Observatory

message: the List of minor planets: 1–1000 sen here when one click over Arequipa.
Arequipa is not en Cambridge, Massachusetts but in Peru. It is not evident, that the Harvard College Observatory opened  a sub-house en Peru, and it is not good, that you not send at the sub-house when one click over Arekipa en List of minor planets: 1–1000 (line asteroids 475 Ocllo, 504 Cora and 505 Cava).
--Jean-François Clet (talk) 21:10, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Why you not send in Peru ?
Talk:Bob Beers (politician, born 1951)

message: The mention of a so-called NAACP endorsement, in addition to the stuff about white Republicans,  is a blatant lie. The NAACP is forbidden by law, in order to retain its particular tax exempt status, from endorsing candidates; it takes about two seconds of searching their site and Google to determine this fact. The NAACP has not only endorsed no other white Republicans, it hasn't endorsed anyone. I am removing the ridiculous comment about NAACP endorsements and white Republicans. Also, a personal endorsement from an NAACP member is not even remotely the same as an endorsement from an NAACP chapter itself.
74.128.87.11 (talk) 14:05, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NAACP 
Talk:Mathew Wilkinson

message: Sources that say 2003: https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/dope-shot-of-love https://www.tvguide.com/movies/dope/tv-listings/2000098378/ https://www.moviemeter.nl/film/29567/buy 
Sources that say 2004: https://watch.plex.tv/person/mathew-wilkinson https://www.disclord.se/product/dope (Also one themoviedb webpage, but that site is blacklisted on wikipedia)
2006: https://watch.plex.tv/movie/dope
Leave the space for its year empty. If you have substantial proof of its release year, leave a message here on talk page, and ping me. ExclusiveEditor Notify Me! 15:27, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dope(film) year.
Talk:John Brennan

message: Under People, the listings are no longer in sequence by birth date. Please fix. 184.78.81.245 (talk) 16:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Per MOS:DABORDER, disambiguation page entries "should be ordered to best assist the reader[s] in finding their intended article". While order of birth may seem a logical ordering, I don't expect people will typically know a John Brennan birth year when searching. I reordered the list based on the recommendations in the MOS guideline. —ADavidB 15:52, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequence
Talk:Monique Dupree

message: The reason why I am making these changes is because Monique Dpree did not WIN the scream queen contest, nor did she coin the phrase herself.  Debbie Rochon was the first person to in fact refer to Monique as the first black scream queen the day of the scream queen contest.  saying that she won is now accurate and can be proven by going to fangoria tv and viewing the first episode of the scream queen contest.  After she was referred to as the first black scream queen by the scream queen herself, she then adapted the name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.239.129.78 (talk) 22:43, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to introduction - origin of name SQ 

message: Sparkel Media Graphics StevenKaggwa (talk) 23:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Best Printing Service in Kampala Uganda
Talk:Liverpool Arena

message: It might be worth redoing this article to cover both the Echo Arena section and the BT Conference centre, the entire building is called ACC Liverpool but the Arena and Conference Centre now have indivdually sponsored names. 81.31.97.129 (talk) 16:11, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Either do a new article on the BT Convention Centre or rename this one to ACC Liverpool, for that is the name of the entire complex encompassing both the Echo Arena and the BT Convention Centre. Both parts are now featured in this article therefore it's no longer correct to title this 'Echo Arena Liverpool' when it also covers the convention centre. 94.194.15.94 (talk) 02:53, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page just about the Arena - Not true any more  

message: Does this article need an "incomplete list" of 90 acts who have performed at the venue since 2008, or is it enough to just highlight the biggest acts and say (as the article says currently) "Many world famous artists including Muse, Lady Gaga, Oasis, Nickelback, Queen + Paul Rodgers, Katy Perry, KISS, Rihanna and Beyoncé have performed at Echo Arena"? It doesn't seem that useful to the reader to throw out a sprawling list of 90 artists and leave them to carefully draw their own conclusions about which were significant and what this might say about the venue. --McGeddon (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical events list 
Talk:Planet Heroes

message: Does anyone find it strange that there are no toys based on Ceres or Eris? Pluto's status as a dwarf planet is even acknowledged in the packaged-in cartoon, and yet they make Planet Heroes for "Star", "Asteroid", and "Moon" before making one for our two newest planets. Why do you think this is happening? 72.75.98.110 (talk) 16:13, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Castle Craig

message: The final two paragraphs felt, to me, inappropriate to an encyclopedic article about the landmark. I have therefore removed them. I have no objection to their reinclusion if someone can explain why they should be there. --Lord Fluffy who rains fire from the heavens (talk) 13:06, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Fowler Mountain

message: That's not a mountain. That's a hill.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.1.195.95 (talk) 03:55, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One person's mountain is another person's hill. It's all relative.--Pgagnon999 (talk) 22:37, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chinese cartography

message: The section on the Yuan dynasty is good enough, I suppose, although the article rather drops off a cliff after that. Template:Chinese_maps has some good sources for article expansion, particularly related to Zheng He and Matteo Ricci and their impact on China. "China's First Knowledge of the Americas" by L. Carrington Goodrich answered some questions I would've liked to have seen answered here, and "China's Opposition to Western Science during Late Ming and Early Ch'ing" by George H. C. Wong at jstor also has quite a bit about Chinese officials' rather pointed refusal to learn decent geography on principle and its motivation. — LlywelynII 09:54, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article expansion

message: Would it not be better to title this page Chinese cartography?Bodha2 (talk) 10:41, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed name change 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 23:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Chinese geography →  – A title 'Chinese cartography' would better reflect the scope of the article (see also a topic above). And 'Chinese geography' should redirect Geography of China. Privybst (talk) 07:37, 12 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject China has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 16:17, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 12 September 2022
Talk:Mattabesett Trail

message: I removed several references to Housatonic Range Trail in this article.... The Housatonic Range Trail isn't relevant to content of this article and is in a different part of the state.....Moreover some (all) the references misidentified location of HT... apparently confusing it with what ever the relevant trail is here in this article......Looks like somebody was doing a cut-and-paste job that they failed to complete and/or understand?? The error seems to go back a number of years....I might try to isolate more how this happened. Housatonic Range Trail is mostly in western part of Milford, Conn., north of Candlewood Lake and quite near NY state line....It's only relationship to trails properly mentioned in "Matabesett Trail" is that HT is also a "blue trail. " It's a nice walk... perhaps 12 miles long. Haven't checked whether it's got a page here.
Badiacrushed (talk) 02:37, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Housatonic Range Trail 
Talk:Quinnipiac Trail

message: _ _ At the end of the old second 'graph, i simply dumped this:
: The trail's shape is roughly that of an inverted "Y".
-- which followed 
:(5.1 miles east/west).
because:
# As to SGSP portion of the Q Trail: 
## It certainly doesn't describe that portion, which does not branch. 
## Nor is the very short (250 ft?) blue-blazed connector trail (between Mill River and the picnic area) part of (a branch in) the park's "Blue Trail" -- which is exactly the park's portion of the Q Trail -- nor if it were perversely considered part, does the result significantly resemble a Y in that orientation 
## Nor does it have in the park (except one a very small scale) sharp bends or an overall change of direction by more than about 30°: from roughly W-ward to  roughly WSW-ward.) 
# Topologically, the combination of the Regicides Trail (not part of this topic!) and Q-Trail is Y-like in having three pieces meeting a common point, and it is somewhat like an inverted lower-case cursive "y" in that 
## the W-bound Q goes away, near the junction of Q and R, more or less N (but initially NW) 
## the E-bound Q goes from there more or less E  (but soon NE for a nearly half of that leg's length, and 
## the R goes more or less S (but for about half its length, roughly SSW and for the other half, roughly SSE). 
## And for me, the resemblance to a right-side-up lower-case "h" is stronger -- even tho the hump of the h is too short and deformed inward and up on the right, and the lower vertical has started to curve into more of an open-paren shape.  
#: But there's no hint that more than the SGSP portion is intended, and there is no reference to the R trail in the graph mentioning it - nor until the last of the 8th, and shortest, 'graph.
--Jerzy•t 10:37, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Y-shaped
Talk:Highland Creek (Charlotte neighborhood)

message: Please note: This article is under construction with initial finish expected June 2008.
Marshall600 (talk) 16:44, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Is it just me, or does this article seem like an advertisement for the neigborhood?
Mg rotc2487 (talk) 19:42, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement?
Talk:Soldiers' and Sailors' Monument (New Haven)

message: At present, the article title and content are incorrectly punctuated as regards apostrophes; the monument itself is worded differently ("Soldiers and Sailors of New Haven who died...), and some source documents omit any apostrophes, whilst others (e.g.  Connecticut's Civil War Monuments) show them correctly...  I think Wikipedia should use correct punctuation; any views?   PANDA(PersonAmendingNumerousDefectiveApostrophes) (talk) 18:10, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apostrophes
Talk:Militant career of Osama bin Laden

message: Get this off the page. Its all conspiracy crap and what the hell has half of it even got to do with bin Laden's militant activity?? 
Alexander Downer and Abu Bakar Bashir? Come on - get this drivel off wikipedia.
:Quite a lot of WP:RS in the main article Allegations of CIA assistance to Osama bin Laden for the  removal of the complete section. Though i agree this section needs to be overworked and shortened. I suggest you work on the main article first. Try to fix that article if you think there are problems or suggest it for deletion if you think it does not have sufficient WP:RS or fails other policies for inclusion. IQinn (talk) 02:41, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  CIA rubbish 

message: This whole part seems to be a sockpuppet for http://emperors-clothes.com/news/binl.htm
I don't know if this can be called unbiased. Maybe you guy should check this part a bit cause it seems you're just posting stuff from conspiracy websites.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.143.32.54 (talk) 11:36, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yugoslav wars (1991–1999) 
Talk:Sofia Boutella

message: French or Spanish?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.225.33.104 (talk) 04:29, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is her last name pronounced? 

message: Is she a Berber? It might be interesting to see, as I don't know of many Berber actresses who appear in Hollywood movies.--Bellerophon5685 (talk) 01:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berber
Talk:John Bright (disambiguation)

message: I'd thought there might be an article already, and am not sure what the dab might be; here's a bit of background, and this should be on List of historical ships in British Columbia; it might be covered in a related article, will look into it.Skookum1 (talk) 05:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[John Bright (ship)]] needed
Talk:Sky Picnic

message: The Sky Picnic website seems to be offline. For most practical purposes Sky Picnic is dead in the water, and maybe the article should reflect this.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 13:35, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead in the water?

message: I think this article is now seriously out of date and the information on this subject needs to be updated since much of it reads as though Sky Picnic is still in the pipeline. What is the current position on this? Is Picnic dead in the water as suggested above or is it still being floated as an idea? Have Sky or Ofcom said anything else about it since September 2008? What was the outcome of the consultation? Just a few ideas of things we need to add. Cheers TheRetroGuy (talk) 12:53, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Picnic more or less died in 2008, but there has been some talk of the plan being refloated if the Conservatives win the 2010 general election. However, there is a lot of WP:CRYSTAL involved, and for most practical purposes the scheme is dead.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 13:08, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed
Talk:1st Shock Army

message: Reccimend renaming this to 1st Shock Army (Soviet Union) to match the naming conventions for military units that specifies the country.  Ryan.opel (talk) 17:47, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understand the convention, the country name in parentheses is only used in cases where more than one formation with such a name might exist.  Shock armies were unique to the Soviet Union. W. B. Wilson (talk) 19:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename Section
Talk:Battle of Shklow

message: Actually, Shklow is some 300 km northeast of the path of totality. Still the sun would be eclipsed to a degree of a little more than 90%. It lasted from 11:27 AM to 1:59 PM local time (UTC + 3) with a maximum at 12:43. While a 90% eclipse would not be sufficient to considerably darken the day, I still can imagine that it made some impression to those who saw it in those circumstances, ordinary soldiers with little knowledge about celestial mechanics. Surely they took it as a divine omen. --88.73.157.111 (talk) 14:07, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, as confirmed by the primary sources.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  15:11, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solar eclipse 
Talk:Battle of Lyubar

message: Insufficient citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 16:37, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review failed
Talk:Battle of Okhmativ (1655)

message: Can not consider this battle for another score as the Polish-Tartar victory. Muscovite-Cossack army suffered much higher losses there than the Polish side and was forced to withdraw from the battlefield. Image of the individual clashes also fared against it. On the first day of the battle, Polish-Tatar army was victorious in the battle cavalry. Muscovite-Cossack army retreated to laager. Polish side led to the breach in laager. Also ability to combat Muscovite-Cossack army to a large extent was this battle be lost. The only thing that managed to Muscovite-Cossack army in terms of tactical that it could not be completely broken down and managed to withdraw (and is primarily due to the passivity of the Tartars bribed). There is no here any elements from the tactical to regarded this as an inconclusive battle. It was a tactical victory Poles and Tatars. From the strategy side could be the battle for the inconclusive, although it would be easier to identify here the winner Polish-Tatar, because it is through action in this battle the Poles managed to stop a major offensive Cossacks-Muscovite and forced them to retreat to the east. Cossack military successes in this field, this only 	
rescue Puszkarenko and Bohun. From both strategic and tactical side, this battle was a victory Polish-Tartar troops.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kcdlp (talk • contribs) 04:01, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Outcome of the battle
Talk:Battle of Shepeleviche

message: I can't find anything on a place called "Shepelevichy", except Wikipedia reprints . There's 5 for "Shepeleviche"  and 1 for "Szepelewicze". So I'm going to move it from "Shepelevichy" to "Shepeleviche".Volunteer Marek (talk) 04:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Template talk:Leaders of Lithuania since 1919

message: Somehow the LKP First Secretaries should not be appearing with the Lithuanian flag next to them, no? —PētersV (talk) 17:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Somehow LKP First Secretaries of puppet governments should not be confused with real presidents? And are "leaders" installed by force really "leaders" at all? And perhaps one should not imply a continuity of Lithuania (independent) to Lithuania (SSR) to Lithuania (independence restored)? FYI, we split presidents and first secretaries to separate templates for Latvia. —PētersV (talk) 14:51, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Paleckis is not a past president or Lithuania, just as Kirchesteins is not a recognized president of Latvia. PētersV <SMALL>      TALK</SMALL> 14:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presidents or First Secretaries 

message: Would "Heads of state" (as with other countries' templates) be a more accurate description for  the people listed in this template? Sardanaphalus (talk) 00:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Heads of state"?
Talk:Wireless configuration utility

message: hi,
I am using Linux as my operating system and my laptop has an Intel PRO/Wireless 2915ABG Network Connection Card. 
As I understand from the table, Intel Wireless Cards don't support Linux. 
Am I missing out on something or is that to be corrected?
greets
Dzinch (talk) 18:02, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Datil-Mogollon Section

message: The definition of this section seems to be based on a 1986 work that is out of date. Official sources of more recent vintage (https://www.nps.gov/common/uploads/photogallery/nri/park/geology/49177B13-1DD8-B71B-0BF120CC77B24F45/49177B13-1DD8-B71B-0BF120CC77B24F45-large.jpg; https://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/i2720/i2720_pamphlet.pdf) show a Datil Section and do not show the Zuni-Acoma section of the older source. --Kent G. Budge (talk) 19:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date section definition?