Talk:Telugu cinema

message: This page seems to have taken the content from Tollywood. Don't quite seem to understand the reason! Maybe the admin/mods can do something Mspraveen 12:36, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Image:TeluguMovieSuper.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 08:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old messages

message: The image :File:Daana Veera Soora Karna.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:23, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with File:Daana Veera Soora Karna.jpg

message: I removed a lot of stuff claiming the Guinness records. They must be cited using the Guinness site as reference. But here except for the film studios no fact was cited using that. --Commander (Ping Me) 15:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guinness Book of Records 

message: The Andhra Pradesh Film Chamber has decided to crack down on dubbed films in the state. The Chamber has passed a few resolutions and the most important among them is the ban on dubbed films during festivals. Another key resolution is the increase in surcharge from 20% to 50% on dubbed films.Could anyone mention it with proper reference in article.14.96.81.197 (talk) 09:46, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: . Provide a reference if you want it added. There is no restriction for placing references here. Secret of success Talk to me 12:30, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

text: From the editing pattern it's quite clear to me that all the accounts are socks of Padmal. In what way does the section violate WP:NPOV? It's a fact which was verified by even newspapers published inside Andhra. —Vensatry (Ping me) 08:05, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

text: If a section contains peacock terms, it doesn't mean that we should wholly remove it. That being the case the article itself contains a lot of peacock terms for which we should take this to Afd per your view. —Vensatry (Ping me) 06:02, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

text: That's according to your opinion. Do you have any sources for "Telugu cinema is the second largest in terms of revenue and infrastructure?" Producing large no. of films doesn't make any industry bigger. That being the case, the Telugu industry has produced more no. of films than Bollywood in the past. Does it make Telugu cinema bigger than Bollywood? —Vensatry (Ping me) 05:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Remember this edit which was made by you.  —Vensatry (Ping me) 05:17, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

text: You are a quick learner! —Vensatry (Ping me) 05:12, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't waste time in arguing with sockpuppets. Since you have questioned my neutrality, here are a few samples to show your neutrality: Your contributions clearly show that you're against the Tamil language and a Telugu POV pusher. The revert that you made in Chittoor and the reason that you gave for it "Does not need Tamil here, the put Telugu alphabet for chennai first before putting tamil alphabet for chittoor" really makes me laugh  aloud. Anyways, nice try. Keep going. —Vensatry (Ping me) 05:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

text: I have plenty of experience in this project than you. I don't have the necessity to initiate an RFC or I'm afraid either. It was you who started talking about going for an RFC. So you can very well do that if you need consensus. —Vensatry (Ping me) 06:02, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubbing films issue

message: ragupathi venkataratnam naidu  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.134.119.164 (talk) 10:58, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  award names 

message: I have checked every line, unable to see any problems with lay out and grammar, no redundancy also, kindly check it once again
Nandhakishore (talk) 19:48, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lay Out 

message: I added information stating Telugu industry is second largest and I added the following citations:
*http://ibnlive.in.com/news/telugu-industry-to-observe-shutdown-on-fri/112050-8-69.html
*http://content.ibnlive.in.com/article/18-Jun-2008movies-news/chiranjeevis-entry-into-politics-ruffles-many-feathers-67358-8.html
*http://www.thehindu.com/arts/cinema/telugu-film-industry-mou-with-motion-pictures-association-of-america/article3205612.ece
*http://ibnlive.in.com/news/tamil-film-industry-to-get-a-corporate-makeover/48983-8.html
173.39.121.43 (talk) 06:41, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Look my friend, I highly appreciate your efforts in finding out which industry is bigger. Take time to read this policy when you get time. There are a lot of contradicting sources which say either way: This one for revenue, This states Tamil Nadu yields more revenue in the south. I can still show many sources which are much more reliable than yours. —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:39, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added a similar point to the DRN page, but Vesantry, the policy you cited actually would be an argument in favor of including this info (along with the opposing perspective). That is, when reliable sources disagree about something, we don't say nothing--rather, we represent both (or more) perspectives, keeping WP:NPOV in mind for appropriate balance. Now I have no idea about the quality of the sources presented, but our policy has never been to simply ignore real-world disputes, but rather to cover them via reliable sources. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Revenues alone do not speak of the size of the Industry, most of Tamil films are dubbed and they earn their revenue from telugu Film market, Hardly any Telugu films are dubbed into Tamil as it is considered not a money making venture. So revenues from Andhra Pradesh are also counted under Tamil film industry and claimed as Second largest industry.
* A good chunk of Tamil films are dubbed into Telugu because of the most lucrative market it offers to films, not just Tamil films but many other languages dub films into TeluguList_of_Telugu_films_of_2012, Telugu movies or other movie industries except rarely do not care to dub them into TamilList_of_Tamil_films_of_2012 as it does not offer such a big or attractive market, dubbing into Tamil is more hassle and is not considered a money making event, the shortage of theaters in TN poses a challenge for movies struggling for screens to release. 
RTPking (talk) 01:11, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

text: Both of you need to stop this unproductive discussion. You're both engaging, or asking the other to engage in, original research and treating this as forum. All we care is what reliable sources say. We are not here to debate the merits of government policy, or the relative quality of different film industries. As has been explained by myself and a DRN volunteer at the DRN, we can either include both POV attributed by multiple sources, or we can provide no information. We cannot engage in personal research to determine which claim is actually true. Qwyrxian (talk)
It is a clearly established fact that Telugu film industry is the second largest Film industry in term of Annual film production, so why is this fact being stopped from presented on the Article ?
RTPking (talk) 19:10, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

text: This discussion is currently taking place at WP:DRN. You can't hold the discussion in 2 places simultaneously, it's too difficult. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:18, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Second Largest Film Industry in India

message: Should this article state that the Telugu film industry is the "second largest film industry in India"? (see this diff for the original proposed addition). The section above discusses the concerns of currently involved editors in detail, which mainly revolve around the definition of "largest"  and the fact that sources present varying (sometimes contradictory) opinions on the matter. A variety of solutions have been proposed: 
*State nothing because the information is contradictory and unclear.
*State both competing positions, with clear attribution (something like, "According to Source X, the A is the largest, but according to Source Y, B is the largest").
*Use the already proposed phrase, as in the diff above.
*Use a word or phrase more specific than "largest" which can be sourced more directly.
Alternative suggestions are welcome as well. Please note that I have no personal opinion on the matter, and am drafting this RfC as a neutral party on behalf of the main disputants. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:39, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Vensatry has two posted in the section above asserting that other industries (Tamil Nadu, specifically) are larger than Andhra Pradesh's. No comment on whether or not those are good quality or reliable. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:24, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw them. Looks like the largeness is revenue-specific. I do not dispute The Times of India as a reliable source. Perhaps the largeness has more to do with output and reputation? Erik (talk | contribs) 14:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Your claim is ridiculous. If the easiest way to measure an industry's size is annual film output, Telugu film industry must have been bigger than Bollywood during the period 2005–08. Quoting claims such as Guinness record, largest film studio in the world and highest number of theaters for any state in India, doesn't necessarily mean that an industry is bigger or prospective. We shouldn't make conclusions based on personal opinion. What we need is quality third-party sources verifying the claim. —Vensatry (Ping me) 11:55, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: How can producing the highest number of films for a period of 4-5 years make an industry consistent. Your case being the argument, there are chances that the Tamil film industry had produced more no. of films for a certain period in it's 80 year history. All the sources you've quoted only mention the size in terms of film output and not on revenue or world-wide distribution. As I already said, we can say "As of year" XX industry was largest in terms of "films produced annually". —Vensatry (Ping me) 04:40, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Please see my point above. I never said that the Tamil film industry produced more no. of films than others. Likewise none of the sources say that the Telugu film industry is larger in terms of revenue or worldwide distribution. We cannot go with POV pushing by taking into account some vague statements provided by the so called reliable sources. —Vensatry (Ping me) 15:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Come on mate. I guess you pretend not to get my point. As I said earlier I never disputed the fact that the Telugu film industry has churned out more no. of films than Tamil in the recent years. But that does not necessarily mean that it's bigger than Tamil in every other aspect. Your conclusions are definitely POV-pushing. Before I provide sources, can you please provide  sources which say that Telugu is Second in the country in terms of Revenue and Film distribution. —Vensatry (Ping me) 06:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You might have a look at this edit. Are you sure that the Telugu film industry will continue producing more no. of films in the future. The facts needs dates per WP:DATED. I included this long back which you constantly reverted. —Vensatry (Ping me) 06:22, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: To answer your dubbed films issue read this. You removed that section saying that it violates NPOV. Infact, adding that gives more neutrality to the article as currently I can see only some flowery phrases about the subject in the article. —Vensatry (Ping me) 06:35, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Thanks for your extensive research. But I feel sorry to say that you haven't understood our policies. We cannot take this into consideration as it seems to violate WP:OR. We always go by sources and not OR. Do you think Telugu films run only inside the Telugu territory. They have a decent market in Karnataka and more recently in Kerala also. "Idlebrain" is a Pro-Telugu website and is not considered a reliable source. Making statements like "This move of Govt. Of TN was only to save the TN film industry, which could not survive dubs coming in from Telugu Film industry in 1990s" makes me only laugh because you completely ignore the fact that films like Geethanjali, Shiva (Dubbed into Telugu as Udhayam) made it big inside TN in the past. What's your say on such films? You talk only about Tamil films being released in Andhra and not Telugu films in other territories. —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:06, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

text: I never admitted that my edits violated WP:NPOV at any point of time in my WP life. Presence of weasel words doesn't mean that the whole section has to be done away with. We can always re-write the section using words that present the fact in a neutral manner. I reverted you to maintain the status quo as you were removing it without consensus. Now coming to your sources, I'm afraid Wikipedia articles cannot be taken into consideration as they constitute circular sourcing and I've given enough explanations about the "idlebrain" source. I'm going to go ahead and restore the dubbed films section since that was removed without consensus. Start an RFC for that too if you want. —Vensatry (Ping me) 19:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

text: Can you quote some genuine examples of myself violating WP:NPOV. It's clear that apart from NPOV and WP:V you don't know any of our policies and you haven't read the mentioned ones either. So take time to read WP:VANDNOT too. This RFC is going nowhere in a constructive way and am sick of making you understand things better. —Vensatry (Ping me) 04:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC on use of "second largest" 

message: Vensatry, imho this section belongs in the Tamil cinema section, since this is about Tamil films, not Telugu? -- Dravidian  Hero  22:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It can be added in both the articles, since it's directly connected with Tamil films and Telugu territory. A source from Hindu says that in 2005 the Telugu box-office was completely dominated by dubbed films from Tamil. It shows how those films had an impact in Andhra. Even after I re-wrote the section in a highly neutral manner User:RTPking keeps removing that saying vandalism. He removed the section by himself without any consensus. So even if this section seems irrelevant here it shouldn't be removed until a consensus is reached. —Vensatry (Ping me) 04:23, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think, there is a valid argument, when we say Telugu cinema was affected by dubbed Tamil films in a historical perspective, but there needs to be reliable sources, which exactly state that. Otherwise this should be transfered to the Tamil article.-- Dravidian  Hero  17:38, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

text: User:RTPking is edit-warring with two users. They have made additions (phrase like "to save their own film industries", "not fearing the loss of revenue" for instance) which was not mentioned in the source to suit their POV. One more revert you do I'm going to report you. —Vensatry (Ping me) 08:10, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: RTPking has moved to Tamil cinema with similar edits as here: diff -- Dravidian  Hero  18:18, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

text: Not in the article you will not. Any of you who starts edit warring there gets blocked. Period. I started a section there recommending we remove the sentence entirely, as it's only logical that if the term "largest" is ambiguous here, it's ambiguous over there, too. But go discuss it on the talk page first. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:46, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

text: Excuse me? You don't get to make changes and then declare that others have to discuss them before reverting you. Yes, discussion is good, but you cannot state that your edits automatically get to stay. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:55, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubbed films section 

message: Just to clarify why those links were removed. First, you cannot add a category in  "Further info" template. This is because, quite simply, a category doesn't provide any further information--it just lists a bunch of WP articles. If we had a "list" article of AP cinema crew, we could certainly link to that in the See Also section.
As for the Music, it simply doesn't belong here. That is an article about music that is commonly found in AP. However, I would be willing to have a link to the specific section of that article in the See Also, and I'll add it now as a compromise. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:15, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't have opposed this one had the section about cinema in Music of Andhra Pradesh been larger. The information about cinema in the article is way too less. Thanks, TheStrikeΣagle  14:19, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits (cats and Music) 

message: User:Muralli raised concerns about my recent clean-up (more still needs to be done, but I went as far as I had the energy for last night) on my talk page. I'll respond to those here.
First, Muralli was concerned about the change to the lead. The purpose of the lead is to summarize the article and provide introductory material. Before, the lead included some broad info like how "big" the industry it is--that's good. It also established when the industry started--that's also good. But then, there were just discussions of 3 or 4 random movies--that's bad. So, I moved the list of movies into the History section. The lead could be expanded, but it should be expanded based on a what is in the rest of the article.
Second, Muralli was concerned about the times that I removed individual movies or people. I did this because the Cinema of Andhra Pradesh article should not contain a large list of movies and how they performed. It should note only those that are particularly important for the broad, historical picture of the industry. In this case, we should really be using books or academic journals or other long-term reference works to decide what belongs in the History section. This helps ensure that we're getting an accurate picture of the history, instead of just picking out movies we like. We should not be mentioning each monetary milestone, and every movie included there has to be justified (first X, biggest Y, caused lasting change Z, etc.). It's possible that some of the movies/people I removed are somehow important, but it wasn't explained well; if so, feel free to reintroduce them and we can discuss.
And this gets to teh more general point. Some of the edits I made are actually mandatory per policy--moving the specific details out of the lead, removing sources that don't meet WP:RS, removing puffery, removing unsourced information, and fixing grammar problems. Some of them, though, are discretionary. I'm more than happy to discuss the details, and I don't even mind if you re-add the things you think I took out unreasonably. But if you do so, don't re-add the problems. That means that a blanket revert of my work is a bad plan, because it leaves the article in a much worse state. Qwyrxian (talk) 21:43, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I plan to reintroduce some info back to the lead...but the article is full-protected...is it possible to semi-protect it so that I can edit it? Thanks, ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 14:11, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

text: Okay, I'm willing to believe you on idlebrain. As for the lead, what sort of info do you think needs to be re-added? I'm pretty opposed to mentioning all but the smallest number of movies in the lead. I do think that the "second largest # of films" comments should be returned to the lead. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I support you that list of films should not be added to the lead, they should be present else where in the article, but the second largest # of films is published every year  by "CENTRAL BOARD OF FILM CERTIFICATION Annual Report" by Govt. of India, this information may be mentioned here along with the specific year as per the source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RTPking (talk • contribs) 17:46, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that that should be in the lead (I had moved it there in my version). Absent any opposition, we can move it back after the protection expires (it looks fairly likely the person who was objecting is a long time sockpupeteer, and thus not allowed to have a voice in the discussion). Qwyrxian (talk) 22:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Since Murrallli was confirmed to be a sock, once the protection is lifted, I'm going to go back in and make the changes I made before; I'll do them by hand, because the article's in a different place than before, but this is actually a better starting point than the version filled with excessive detail. I'll be open to suggestions and reverts from any person who's actually allowed to edit Wikipedia. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:41, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Lifted before I saw this. Dougweller (talk) 17:37, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerns about my edits 

message: Could an admin (I mean, and admin not involved in the content dispute) please make "1915 to 2013" a level three heading? It's clearly intended to be part of the broader "History" section. I doubt there's anything controversial about this request. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:11, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That does make it consistent with the two subsections of History, so  Done --Redrose64 (talk) 11:30, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: While the article is protected, let's have some discussion on some of the specific edits I made. One example: The end of the "early development" section has the following: 
The last three pretty obviously need to go, because they're grammatically incorrect, and if I guess at the meaning, POV. But I actually think the rest should go because it isn't sourced; I mean, yes, it's self-evident (doesn't need a source) to state that those three movies centre on religious figures, etc., as that can be determined simply by watching the movies. But the half setence before it is an interpretive one that requires a source. We could just tag it as needing a citation, but my preference is usually to remove any sort of interpretation first, and then if someone later finds a citation, they can re-add it. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:14, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  End of early development section 

message: An abandoned Articles for creation draft for Pathi Bhakti has just been deleted. Pathi Bhakti  is listed at  List of Telugu films of the 1940s as a 1943 film. A 1958 Tamil film with the same title also exists:  http://www.nthwall.com/ta/8321903055 
 
If you think that either or both are notable, you may want to create articles for them. Eastmain (talk • contribs)  12:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pathi Bhakti 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 00:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Cinema of Andhra Pradesh →  – Now that the state of AP is being divided into 2 states, it makes sense to rename the article to Telugu cinema. Cheers, --Relisted.  — Amakuru (talk) 12:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Hardly any participation from others and the move is already made ? Thats unfortunate. Marchoctober (talk) 18:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Move

message: I have started creating the article List of Indian film series. I need your help in adding the film series in Telugu language (if any). Since there might be a lot of them consisting of 2 films, my opinion is that only those film series with 3 or more films should be added (all of which have been released only). Please feel free to come and add more and do the required corrections. Once fully created, this list will be highly informative. All future opinions and comments should be posted here or on my talk page only please since I would not be watching this talk page. - Jayadevp13 17:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help Please! 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Telugu cinema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130526173757/http://m.ibnlive.com/news/south-cinema/telugu-director-k-vishwanath--turns-84-today/373805-71.html to http://m.ibnlive.com/news/south-cinema/telugu-director-k-vishwanath--turns-84-today/373805-71.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:07, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Telugu cinema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110516191300/http://cbfcindia.gov.in:80/CbfcWeb/fckeditor/editor/images/Uploadedfiles/file/Publications/ANR2009-ch6-SI.pdf to http://cbfcindia.gov.in/CbfcWeb/fckeditor/editor/images/Uploadedfiles/file/Publications/ANR2009-ch6-SI.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110927215524/http://www.iifa.com/web07/showcase/2006-filmfestival.htm to http://www.iifa.com/web07/showcase/2006-filmfestival.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071222072017/http://cicff2007.org:80/content/youth-jury-media-bridge/22 to http://cicff2007.org/content/youth-jury-media-bridge/22
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130427124956/http://www.canadafilmfestival.com:80/Festival/2013OfficialSelections/tabid/486/Default.aspx to http://www.canadafilmfestival.com/Festival/2013OfficialSelections/tabid/486/Default.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100707082250/http://www.hindustantimes.com:80/Telugu-star-Shoban-Babu-passes-away/Article1-283771.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Telugu-star-Shoban-Babu-passes-away/Article1-283771.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131005010025/http://www.telugism.com/video/special-story-veteran-music-director-susarla-dakshinamurthy-etv2 to http://www.telugism.com/video/special-story-veteran-music-director-susarla-dakshinamurthy-etv2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:13, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Telugu cinema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120510163423/http://reliancemediaworks.com/Press21.html?TB_iframe=true&height=500&width=545 to http://www.reliancemediaworks.com/Press21.html?TB_iframe=true&height=500&width=545
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131102193605/http://www.thehindu.com/arts/cinema/article2969786.ece?service=mobile to http://www.thehindu.com/arts/cinema/article2969786.ece?service=mobile
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Telugu cinema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120510163423/http://reliancemediaworks.com/Press21.html?TB_iframe=true&height=500&width=545 to http://www.reliancemediaworks.com/Press21.html?TB_iframe=true&height=500&width=545
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110516191300/http://cbfcindia.gov.in:80/CbfcWeb/fckeditor/editor/images/Uploadedfiles/file/Publications/ANR2009-ch6-SI.pdf to http://cbfcindia.gov.in/CbfcWeb/fckeditor/editor/images/Uploadedfiles/file/Publications/ANR2009-ch6-SI.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110927215524/http://www.iifa.com/web07/showcase/2006-filmfestival.htm to http://www.iifa.com/web07/showcase/2006-filmfestival.htm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071222072017/http://cicff2007.org:80/content/youth-jury-media-bridge/22 to http://cicff2007.org/content/youth-jury-media-bridge/22
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130427124956/http://www.canadafilmfestival.com:80/Festival/2013OfficialSelections/tabid/486/Default.aspx to http://www.canadafilmfestival.com/Festival/2013OfficialSelections/tabid/486/Default.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100707082250/http://www.hindustantimes.com:80/Telugu-star-Shoban-Babu-passes-away/Article1-283771.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Telugu-star-Shoban-Babu-passes-away/Article1-283771.aspx
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131005010025/http://www.telugism.com/video/special-story-veteran-music-director-susarla-dakshinamurthy-etv2 to http://www.telugism.com/video/special-story-veteran-music-director-susarla-dakshinamurthy-etv2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Telugu cinema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120510163423/http://reliancemediaworks.com/Press21.html?TB_iframe=true&height=500&width=545 to http://www.reliancemediaworks.com/Press21.html?TB_iframe=true&height=500&width=545
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110516191300/http://cbfcindia.gov.in:80/CbfcWeb/fckeditor/editor/images/Uploadedfiles/file/Publications/ANR2009-ch6-SI.pdf to http://cbfcindia.gov.in/CbfcWeb/fckeditor/editor/images/Uploadedfiles/file/Publications/ANR2009-ch6-SI.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110927215524/http://www.iifa.com/web07/showcase/2006-filmfestival.htm to http://www.iifa.com/web07/showcase/2006-filmfestival.htm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071222072017/http://cicff2007.org:80/content/youth-jury-media-bridge/22 to http://cicff2007.org/content/youth-jury-media-bridge/22
*Added archive https://web.http://www.webcitation.org/6EnNtTNiS to http://www.canadafilmfestival.com/Festival/2013OfficialSelections/tabid/486/Default.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100707082250/http://www.hindustantimes.com:80/Telugu-star-Shoban-Babu-passes-away/Article1-283771.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Telugu-star-Shoban-Babu-passes-away/Article1-283771.aspx
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131005010025/http://www.telugism.com/video/special-story-veteran-music-director-susarla-dakshinamurthy-etv2 to http://www.telugism.com/video/special-story-veteran-music-director-susarla-dakshinamurthy-etv2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Telugu cinema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120326135647/http://bharatjanani.com/paul-muni-of-india-chittoor-v-nagayya/ to http://bharatjanani.com/paul-muni-of-india-chittoor-v-nagayya/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140119000128/http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/records-1/largest-film-studio to http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/records-1/largest-film-studio
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://reliancemediaworks.com/Press21.html?TB_iframe=true&height=500&width=545
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130921054328/https://indiancinema100.in/swadeshi/ to https://indiancinema100.in/swadeshi/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.iifa.com/web07/showcase/2006-filmfestival.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2010/04/22/stories/2010042251060500.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://m.ibnlive.com/news/south-cinema/telugu-director-k-vishwanath--turns-84-today/373805-71.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://cicff2007.org:80/content/youth-jury-media-bridge/22
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141018010411/http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/NTR-Sridevi-greatest-actor-of-all-times-in-India-survey/Article1-1023608.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Entertainment/Bollywood/NTR-Sridevi-greatest-actor-of-all-times-in-India-survey/Article1-1023608.aspx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hindu.com/2010/02/19/stories/2010021950760200.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hindustantimes.com:80/Telugu-star-Shoban-Babu-passes-away/Article1-283771.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110929192609/http://www.cinegoer.com/bhookailas.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/bhookailas.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.telugism.com/video/special-story-veteran-music-director-susarla-dakshinamurthy-etv2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120225071843/http://www.telugucinema.com/c/publish/starsprofile/srajeshwararao_oct27_printer.php to http://www.telugucinema.com/c/publish/starsprofile/srajeshwararao_oct27_printer.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141227074407/http://www.rediff.com/movies/slide-show/slide-show-1-south-director-seenu-vaitla-on-dookudu/20111004.htm to http://www.rediff.com/movies/slide-show/slide-show-1-south-director-seenu-vaitla-on-dookudu/20111004.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:29, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: We need to add more Templates such as "Indian Cinema" where all the other film industries are based so that navigation from this Page to those pages would be easier and maintainable. We also need to add History, Budget, Rankings and Influences from this Film Industry to others. JayadevK (talk) 14:18, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: I would suggest posting this somewhere like Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics rather than at article level. Alternatively you could always have a go yourself and then suggest it in the IND portal.  —  IVORK Discuss 02:21, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the Indian cinema template in this edit, but the article looks a bit messy with an Infobox, Indian cinema template and a table of contents. I don't understand the other additions  is suggesting. Are you talking about templates? Prose? Where do you suppose this information would come from, if it were to be added? If you have specific content additions to suggest, that'd be helpful. And we'll need ample references. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 23 August 2017 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 18 external links on Telugu cinema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120928162055/http://www.cinegoer.com/pathalabhairavi.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/pathalabhairavi.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130124081428/http://cbfcindia.gov.in/CbfcWeb/fckeditor/editor/images/Uploadedfiles/file/Publications/ANNUAL_2011.pdf to http://cbfcindia.gov.in/CbfcWeb/fckeditor/editor/images/Uploadedfiles/file/Publications/ANNUAL_2011.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070410122843/http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema8.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema8.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218150028/http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema5.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema5.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120926224130/http://www.cinegoer.com/malapilla.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/malapilla.htm
*Added  tag to http://entertaianment.oneindia.in/celebs/lakshmi/biography.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120227192441/http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema7.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema7.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218145901/http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema10.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema10.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071227103112/http://www.idlebrain.com/trade/records/bommarillu.html to http://www.idlebrain.com/trade/records/bommarillu.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071227103112/http://www.idlebrain.com/trade/records/bommarillu.html to http://www.idlebrain.com/trade/records/bommarillu.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120928162055/http://www.cinegoer.com/pathalabhairavi.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/pathalabhairavi.htm
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120708124521/http://entertainment.oneindia.in/telugu/top-stories/2010/kamal-film-fest-030710.html to http://entertainment.oneindia.in/telugu/top-stories/2010/kamal-film-fest-030710.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://cicff2007.org/content/youth-jury-media-bridge/22
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.canadafilmfestival.com/Festival/2013OfficialSelections/tabid/486/Default.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160131092459/http://www.utopiales.org/en/baahubali-beginning to http://www.utopiales.org/en/baahubali-beginning
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151117185634/http://program.hiff.org/films/detail/baahubali_the_beginning_2015 to http://program.hiff.org/films/detail/baahubali_the_beginning_2015
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131107214524/http://asia.isp.msu.edu/wbwoa/south_asia/india/Films.htm to http://asia.isp.msu.edu/wbwoa/south_asia/india/Films.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hindustantimes.com/Telugu-star-Shoban-Babu-passes-away/Article1-283771.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130504142600/http://www.uiowa.edu/~incinema/narthanasala.html to http://www.uiowa.edu/~incinema/narthanasala.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Annapurna pictures is not a distributor of Telugu cinema. Annapurna pictures is a movie distributor in the USA. The name and link needs to be changed to Annapurna Studios Kirrugot (talk) 17:56, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —KuyaBriBriTalk 18:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 October 2017 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 23 external links on Telugu cinema. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120928162055/http://www.cinegoer.com/pathalabhairavi.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/pathalabhairavi.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130124081428/http://cbfcindia.gov.in/CbfcWeb/fckeditor/editor/images/Uploadedfiles/file/Publications/ANNUAL_2011.pdf to http://cbfcindia.gov.in/CbfcWeb/fckeditor/editor/images/Uploadedfiles/file/Publications/ANNUAL_2011.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070410122843/http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema8.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema8.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218150028/http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema5.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema5.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120926224130/http://www.cinegoer.com/malapilla.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/malapilla.htm
*Added  tag to http://entertaianment.oneindia.in/celebs/lakshmi/biography.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120227192441/http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema7.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema7.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218145901/http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema10.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema10.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120218130208/http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema6.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/telugucinema6.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071227103112/http://www.idlebrain.com/trade/records/bommarillu.html to http://www.idlebrain.com/trade/records/bommarillu.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071227103112/http://www.idlebrain.com/trade/records/bommarillu.html to http://www.idlebrain.com/trade/records/bommarillu.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120928162055/http://www.cinegoer.com/pathalabhairavi.htm to http://www.cinegoer.com/pathalabhairavi.htm
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6W5lwHhfU?url=http://web.archive.org/web/20150204142913/http://ibnlive.in.com/news/mayabazar-is-indias-greatest-film-ever-ibnlive-poll/391184-8-66.html to http://ibnlive.in.com/news/mayabazar-is-indias-greatest-film-ever-ibnlive-poll/391184-8-66.html
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120708124521/http://entertainment.oneindia.in/telugu/top-stories/2010/kamal-film-fest-030710.html to http://entertainment.oneindia.in/telugu/top-stories/2010/kamal-film-fest-030710.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://cicff2007.org/content/youth-jury-media-bridge/22
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.canadafilmfestival.com/Festival/2013OfficialSelections/tabid/486/Default.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140311153453/http://alllightsfilmmagazine.com/filmosphere/movies-more/news/688-naa-bangaru-talli-made-it-big-in-the-tiff-2013 to http://alllightsfilmmagazine.com/filmosphere/movies-more/news/688-naa-bangaru-talli-made-it-big-in-the-tiff-2013
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160131092459/http://www.utopiales.org/en/baahubali-beginning to http://www.utopiales.org/en/baahubali-beginning
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305113415/http://www.etrangefestival.com/2015/fr/film/baahubali_the_beginning to http://www.etrangefestival.com/2015/fr/film/baahubali_the_beginning
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151117185634/http://program.hiff.org/films/detail/baahubali_the_beginning_2015 to http://program.hiff.org/films/detail/baahubali_the_beginning_2015
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131107214524/http://asia.isp.msu.edu/wbwoa/south_asia/india/Films.htm to http://asia.isp.msu.edu/wbwoa/south_asia/india/Films.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hindustantimes.com/Telugu-star-Shoban-Babu-passes-away/Article1-283771.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130504142600/http://www.uiowa.edu/~incinema/narthanasala.html to http://www.uiowa.edu/~incinema/narthanasala.html
*Added  tag to http://www.ap7am.com/ap7am_show_detail_videos.php?newsid=32394
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141218202457/http://telugump3site.blogspot.in/2014/12/pesarattu-2014-telugu-mp3-songs.html to http://telugump3site.blogspot.in/2014/12/pesarattu-2014-telugu-mp3-songs.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:48, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Sai Srujan Pelluri. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 20#Sai Srujan Pelluri until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Ab207 (talk) 13:26, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sai Srujan Pelluri" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Crrush has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  gobonobo + c 22:55, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Crrush]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]