lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:American Rhapsody

message: At the suggestion of Phil Bridger, I've replaced this page with a redirect after a few days with a PROD tag. Given the questionable notability of the article's subject I haven't immediately seen a decent place to merge the information into the new parent article; attempts by other editors are welcome, although I might disagree with creating a new section specifically for this composition. Comments are welcome here or at my talk. SingCal 18:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced with Redirect 

message: Main writer asserted "I am one of the composer's son." about his eulogic articles American Rhapsody and John Serry, Sr.. 62.147.36.251 (talk) 15:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI 

message: I am the primary writer and have undone the editing by User:Damiens.rf, who redirected the title of this article to the parent article John Serry Sr. without making an effort to salvage any portion of American Rhapsody. Since the result of the deletion review process calls for a merger of this article into the parent article, I believe that this action is unwarranted. A I shall make an attempt to merge the full contents of this article into the main article shortly.--Pjs012915 (talk) 20:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undid Redirect by [[User:Damiens.rf]] 

message: I have included an Archive Section with reference citations for original copies of: 1) the published score to American Rhapsody for solo accordion from 1955, 2) the score for the transcription of the composition for solo piano circa 1985 and 3) a performance by the composer John Serry Sr circa 1960 as archived in the John J. Serry Sr Collection of music at the
University of Rochester's Eastman School of Music's Sibley Music Library within the Ruth T. Watanabe Special Collections section 160.72.81.86 (talk) 16:18, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Included an archive section for the score and recordings of the composition
Talk:Akira Koike

message: We seem to have a difference of opinion on which photo to use in the infobox in this article. The two images currently available at Wikipedia Commons are:
File:Akira Koike.jpg|1,873 × 1,630, taken in 2010
File:Koike-akira-shinjuku-Jan2013-cropB.jpg|611 × 916 pixels, taken in 2013
While I would agree that a more recent photo is generally preferable, my view is that the older 2010 photo is of higher resolution, and shows the subject's face more clearly. Any comments by other editors would be welcome here.  --DAJF (talk) 01:08, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Best choice of photo?
Talk:An Open Letter to NYC

message: Hints at 9/11?
I think the lyrics "Two towers down but you're still in the game" and "Dear New York I hope you're doing well, I know a lot has changed and you've been through hell" and, most particularly, "since 9/11 we're still livin'," are a bit more than "hinting" about 9/11. The song is clearly an overt love-letter to the city they love BECAUSE of the events of 9/11. It's not like the Beasties suddenly decided after 9/11 to write a song about NYC. The song is a clear response to 9/11.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ROG 19 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

message: both ["An Open Letter to NYC"] and ["Right Right Now Now"] are stated to be the third single from the album... ??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Heath (talk • contribs) 00:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  third single?
Talk:And Then There's Maude

message: From the article: "In Joan of Arc's case, her achievements are described with lyrics that were popular vernacular at the time, but are now considered to be outdated (Joan of Arc, with the Lord to guide her / She was a sister who really cooked)."
I'm not sure what the above quotation is supposed to mean, but I've always taken this line to be a play on words due to the fact that she was burned at the stake ("...she was a sister who really cooked").  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Santegeezhe (talk • contribs) 13:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My thoughts exactly. I'm removing the mention to outdated vernacular. Puck35 (talk) 18:39, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm thinking that the "outdated vernacular" referred to the use of "sister".  — MusicMaker5376 20:26, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In this case "sister" is clearly a reference to Joan of Arc's religious associations. Puck35 (talk) 04:47, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong.  Joan of Arc wasn't a nun.  She just heard voices.  He's using "sister" in the 70s vernacular of "female friend".  — MusicMaker5376 14:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I know that. I was careful to not say Joan of Arc was a nun. I agree that "sister" is being used in the vernacular sense, but it also appeals to those who *do* think Joan of Arc was a nun. And "sister" is hardly outdated vernacular. Puck35 (talk) 04:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrical pun? 

message: Until someone can provide convincing evidence that Horatio Sanz's "Carol" character is based on Maude's daughter Carol, I'm removing that section. Puck35 (talk) 17:55, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horatio Sanz character? 

message: ...is there any? 69.177.230.253 (talk) 11:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability...
Talk:Animal City

message: Animal City will never be a single, because the album Oral Fixation Vol. 2 is officially closed and out of promotion. The next step is the Oral Fixation Tour live album.
Also, there is no proof or references whatsoever claiming that Animal City is to be the next schedule. As the previous writer said, oral fixation Vol. 2 is finished, and the next promotion is to be a single which is live from the DVD that is to be released on 12 November. Administrators, please remove this page, or at least change it into a page that is describing a SONG, not a SINGLE.
Catsmartness 04:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bounded (set theory)

message: I created this page b/c the current link target of 'unbounded' in the article cofinality refered to boundedness of functions in analysis which is (I believe) not the same thing.  I didn't find any other articles that gave what I believe to be the appropriate meaning.  If I'm incorrect on either count the please say so here and we can merge/move/redirect or what have you. Thanks!
Zero sharp 04:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jamie Yeo

message: There is a current RFC on certain content in Singapore artistes BLP articles that editors watching/editing/passing through this article may be interested in weighing in: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs. This article may be affected due to the inclusion of :Category:Singaporean actors‎ and/or one of its subcategories in the article. RobertskySemi (talk) 23:53, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs
Talk:Zoë Kravitz

message: Starred in Kimi as Angela 190.213.151.39 (talk) 02:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starred in Kimi as Angela 

message: Movie Sound Effects: How Do They Do That? is a video featurette of The Lego Batman Movie. It's not a short film and it wasn't screened in theaters, so it should be in a video section, not in the film section, or removed entirely since it's a negligible entry to begin with. Kumagoro-42 (talk) 12:06, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary entry in filmography 

message: There should be a section added addressing her 2013 Jaden Smith comments and the backlash from them. MisfitBlitz (talk) 00:36, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It’s not of encyclopedic worth. Trillfendi (talk) 01:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jaden Smith
Talk:Will Scott

message: Managers of English football league clubs are obviously notable.  The tagger should do a second's research before wasting people's time like this. Nick mallory 04:23, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Clearly, the subject of this article is notable although the article needs expansion. More research is need to include his career as a player, but being a stub is not grounds for deletion. Daemonic Kangaroo 06:19, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion proposal
Talk:Jimmy Milne (footballer, born 1911)

message: Is this person the primary meaning, or should this name be a disambiguation? PatGallacher (talk) 11:40, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Osamu Hayaishi

message: I created this article on 2007/09/17. You can make contributions by adding relevant information. RS1900 04:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osamu Hayaishi 
Talk:Bitch Please II

message: This is Bitch Please II, so what happened to Bitch Please I? Hartebeest 18:10, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bitch Please?

message: Seeing as this was never released as a single and there's little information about it, wouldn't it be better to put this information underneath a subheader in the Bitch Please page, which itself is rather short. The two of them together may look a bit more impressive. Tony2Times (talk) 22:23, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unify
Talk:Bedok South Secondary School

message: I'm curious why is the school website  as opposed to  ?--Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:41, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh I see. The former redirects to the latter (and was possibly the previous website). Anyway, I'm changing it to the latter. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:42, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  School website
Talk:Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights

message: On note "a" , the reference given is a list of abbreviations and does not support the point made about "approval" of the Ruhashyankiko report. On note "b", the source given is unavailable online. The specific intervention of the Turkish government in the matter of the Whitaker Report needs to be cited. Diranakir (talk) 18:29, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification on notes a & b
Talk:Chorioamnionitis

message: Chorioamnionitis is a fetal disease. I'd like the opening sentence to reflect that. Any takers?
Hovea 05:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: doi:10.1128/CMR.00091-16 JFW | T@lk 23:46, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ureaplasma 

message: # Reformat the article to comply with Wikipedia's quality standards
# Ensure proper citation of sources/update sources
# Possibly add sections for microbiology, incidence, neonatal outcomes, prevention, and risk factors
I. Ly, UCSF (talk) 20:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi  and the rest of Group 2. Welcome! These sound like good goals for the article. I'll try to keep an eye on this talk page, so if you have questions about Wikipedia norms as you get to editing, feel free to ask me here (if I'm being slow to reply, you can post at my talk page). A suggestion: it's sometimes hard to tell what sections an article should have, and what order would help the information flow well. After some discussion in the distant past, several medical editors wrote out a trusty manual for organizing medicine-related articles. For articles related to a disease/syndrome, we recommend (n.b. it's not a requirement; just a suggestion) that you consider the sections listed here. Hopefully the suggestion helps you see where the article is missing information now. It's great to see new editors interested in medicine-related articles! I hope you all decide to stick around. Best, Ajpolino (talk) 21:24, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for pointing out the guide for organizing medicine-related articles! Very helpful, we will generally try to follow these section headings. We appreciate having your eyes on the page as well. B. Hyland 17 (talk) 17:43, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundations II 2020 Group 2 proposed edits 

message: 8/3/20 Peer Review - By Group 1  CAngerman (talk) 20:35, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundations II 2020 Group 1 Peer Review
Talk:Cantaloupe Island

message: There is no evidence that this has ever been a "single record", not least by El Chicano - it's not mentinoed in their article as anything other than an album track. The nearest to such a thing was Us3 1993 single which was certifed gold, but is classed as merely a sample. Not sure how El Chicano's album track is justified here alongside so many other equally worthy versions, as well as, of course, the original album track. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:11, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single?
Talk:Chameleon (composition)

message: It says here the bassline was played on a Minimoog, but on the Head Hunters page it says it was played on an ARP Odyssey. Anyone know which is correct? 81.175.133.73 (talk) 12:08, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Amplifying the issue with the 2-chord vamp, the ABAB... section isn't based on a Dorian scale.  The melody is based on a Bb minor pentatonic scale.  I've always used the song to teach youngsters about the use of pentatonics (and about 16th note syncopation).  Of course, the cadence (and scaling) is more complicated in the C section, and I bypass the theory in it, especially with Middle School kids. I'm not taking the authority to actually change the article because 1) it's not my article, and 2) I can't find references specifically stating that Mr. Hancock intended to use a Bb minor pentatonic scale for the song. I did find http://www.jazzinamerica.org/Media/Audio/22?KeepThis=true&TB_iframe=true&height=640&width=500, but I'm not sure if its authoritative. Weyandt (talk) 17:45, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Pentatonic

message: The beginning of the article describes the song as "1974 jazz standard", while the album it appears on was released in 1973 (also mentioned in the article). Is it a mistake? Or is there some logic behind this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.190.44.175 (talk) 12:37, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology

message: The article makes the following statement:
"The 9:41 edit omits an out-of-tune segment, features a new bassline added in at around 6:40 and new instruments added in post-production."
I can't find an officially released version of Chameleon that is 9:41 long. It only seems to be found in this YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ejaumVVHAUQ . I matched up this version with the original version and there was no edit in the "out of tune" section, nor is there any additional instrumentation. All it does is do an abrupt fadeout at roughly 9:30 into the original track.
Technically, the version in this video isn't even 9:41 long - there's about 10 seconds of silence at the beginning.
The only references I've found to the 9:41 edit are in the comments section of this article: https://www.synthtopia.com/content/2015/04/21/the-iconic-sounds-of-synthesis-herbie-hancocks-chameleon-bassline/ .
This is a long way of saying that I think this text needs to be pulled from the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerfocom (talk • contribs) 01:57, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: 9:41 Edit?
Talk:Alexander McCabe

message: National Archives has a 234 pages file that relates to the 1916 trial and acquittal of McCabe  — billinghurst sDrewth 00:27, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Archives > Piece 208/003: Alexander McCabe possession of explosives, detonators and revolver (1915-1916)
Talk:Climb Ev'ry Mountain

message: OR perhaps a wine tasting website.
Oaky overtones with a touch of cassis!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.88.88.156 (talk) 21:12, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article reads more like commentary. Portions belong in a blog on musical undertones and overtones not Wikipedia. 

message: climb every mountain 58.69.121.146 (talk) 12:39, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mapeh 

message: I just removed a paragraph comparing the subject song to “something wonderful” from the King and I; the paragraph had stated the 2 songs are musically similar. I noticed that the paragraph has been on this page since November 23 2007. But the comparison was never sourced and was supported by only the vaguest of   justifications (“heavy chords”, slow tempo). It is perhaps just the opinion of the person who added it in 2007 (I think their name is Yip1982) but it is my opposing opinion that the comparison is extremely weak and the songs are extremely different. (on the other hand, i agree with everybody that “you’ll never walk alone” is very similar musically and lyrically and and in how it functions in the musical. so I didn’t bother trying to find any source for that!) But our opinions as Wikipedia editors don’t matter. What does matter is finding some other source that makes the comparison — that source  could certainly be added if an editor wishes to return a similar  paragraph back in comparing this song to “something wonderful”. I did search a little online to find somebody else making this comparison and I could not find it. Therefore,  thinking the paragraph not only unsourced but quite inaccurate, I removed it. David Couch (talk) 06:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  comparing to other R&H songs
Talk:Norman's Cay

message: There should probably be a mention of the fact that the island was being developed by Phil Kniskern to be a fly-in-community when Ledher came in and got the place... I don't have enough info to write it, but I'm sure someone knows something and has the time to google it... --Chris 05:34, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: GPS coordinates are: 24.5943733, -76.8098100.
This may be useful if someone expand the article or the subject. SalsaForte (talk) 02:46, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of the C46 wreck.
Talk:Come with Us/The Test

message: According to the article, the Chemical Brothers used a sample of Pielgrzym by Czesław Niemen, but it doesn't state which song contains the sample. I've listened to Pielgrzym multiple times in my search, but I can't hear a thing that sounds like either Come With Us or The Test. I'm not saying the sentence should be removed from the article, but I want some clarification.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Champiness (talk • contribs) 22:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged Sampling? 

message: The video was originally released alongside the single in 2002, the article makes it sound like it wasn't made until 2011.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.152.216 (talk) 15:37, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of video?
Talk:Slim Dusty discography

message: There is an issues with the overall album numbering, somewhere between 50 and 91. His 91 over 50 album was his 91st (hence the title) and it's currently 92. Also Looking Forward was his 100th and it's currently at 101. 
I did have this correct, but someone added Vintage 5, which I believe is correct, so one of the other ones must be a re-issue or something?! I'll have a look at this over the weekend to work it out.Tobyjamesaus (talk) 11:53, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album numbering
Talk:Constant Craving

message: Charlotte Martin also covered this song. It's on her album "Reproductions." 12.54.25.114 (talk) 04:15, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover

message: What were the Cdn ratings of this song? It seems to me it was EVERYWHERE for a while, and I'd assume pretty popular.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.193.84.186 (talk) 16:18, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ratings

message: I found a copy of Life to check if it claims the song was derived in part from the title tune from Spidertronic, but it does not. I have found no other sources that make this claim that are not a forum post or Wikipedia mirror. That said the chord progressions are similar but not impossibly so, and the game had been out for years by the time Ingenue was recorded, but it being a possibility doesn’t mean it’s true. User:Blah2 (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atari ST tune
Talk:Country Gardens

message: Were the lyrics traditional too, or were they written by Grainger? Valetude (talk) 13:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not traditional. There are many sets of lyrics, ranging from sentimental to scabrous! You can find lots of threads about this on the Mudcat Cafe site, e.g. https://mudcat.org/thread.cfm?threadid=1006#3073. The best-known straight lyrics are by Jimmy Rodgers, written for his 1962 pop recording. There are videos available on YouTube, with the full lyrics in the comments--they are also available on sites such as lyrics.com (https://www.lyrics.com/lyric/2144546/Jimmie+F.+Rodgers/English+Country+Garden). The original tune collected by Sharpe & popularized by Grainger was just a dance tune without lyrics. Perhaps some of this info should go in the section Popular versions and parodies, since that version achieved considerable notability in 1962? D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 16:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics? 

message: A version of the tune appears in a sinfonia concertante by the German composer Louis Schindelmeisser (1811-1864). Was it current in Germany, too, or might Schindelmeisser have picked it up from some UK source? Paulwilliam2 (talk) 21:43, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louis Schindelmeisser
Talk:Cracklin' Rosie

message: If that's what the reference says, then that's what we have to say... but it makes no sense for Cracklin' Rosie to be "a store-bought woman" if it's a homemade wine.  Store-bought and homemade are pretty much opposites.  I think it's much more probable that the name refers to a specific brand of cheap commercial wine called Lancer's Crackling Rose, which apparently existed in the earlier years of the 20th Century (you can find references to it in Google). 69.63.50.98 (talk) 18:00, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homemade wine? 

message: I was not sure how, but how do we add a heading about the song being Skate 3? Shelled Turtle (talk) 12:27, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skate 3 

message: Someone has inserted a line about their motorcycle crackling as it slows down. A ridiculous and inappropriate addition to this entry. --Pete3194 (talk) 03:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motorcycle
Talk:Elder law (Massachusetts)

message: I removed about 2/3rds of the article, it was either an outline or how too guide that is no appropriate for inclusion, see WP:NOTHOWTO. I found some copyvio in the middle of it, but can not substantiate that the rest of it was copyvio. In the end its status as copyvio is moot because I think it is proper to remove it either way, the content had not been improved in years, and I don't think its likely it was going to be. Monty845 02:38, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Content removal

message: This whole entry has not even one citation. 68.55.215.193 (talk) 16:57, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations Needed
Talk:Entertainment law

message: Can we find a list of Entertainment Lawyers and add them to this page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nomad2u2001 (talk • contribs) 06:09, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Prominent Lawyers

message: Can we get a way to specific examples where the law side of entertainment, including where they had lost a case as well as won a case. In my opinion showing that side would enhance ones knowledge on Entertainment law.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JeffreyA1110 (talk • contribs) 20:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: @JeffreyA1110: This is a great idea!  Take a look at Google Scholar (scholar.google.com) and also take a look at the SFC library databases, such as JSTOR, to see if you can find some of the seminal Entertainment Law cases.  You can also go to the SFC library and ask for Alex Kustanovich and he can assist you with finding relevant cases.  Go ahead and add the 1-2 sentences, as discussed in the "Add to an article" assignment, on our Wikipedia course page.  Please let me know if you need any help with this. Prof.bgreg (talk) 21:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples of Cases