Talk:Cultural hegemony

message: What is the title of the book alluded to by this phrase in the article?
:A newer treatise is a book by Noam Chomsky
--Pubul 20:55, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: question

message: ::Hegemony, as defined by Gramsci is that widely accepted system of values, morals, ethics, and social structure which holds a society together and creates a cohesive people. Western social structures holding society together (i.e. “the hegemony”) include: authority, morality, sexual restraint, monogamous marriage, personal responsibility, patriotism, national unity, community, tradition, heredity, education, conservatism, language, Christianity, law, and truth. Gramsci's theory called for media and communications to slowly co-opt the people with the “counter-hegemony” propaganda message. Exploring the Culture War in America
This paragraph is rubbish Hanshans23 23:00, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be bold, remove it! Santa Sangre 23:02, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bizarre interpretations of Gramsci

message: Added section. Would be a good idea to accompany it with an example scanned front page of the Independent. 172.143.163.5 00:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gramsci in popular culture

message: I love Chomsky, but does his book belong here?  I mean, there are aspects of cultural hegemony in it (9/11 as a tool, etc.) but not a whole lot.  Chomsky often uses hegemony in the sense of a dominant political force, not in the sense of a carefully assembled ruling force.  I nominate deleting Chomsky from this one.  Maybe another author is more appropriately cited?--Dylanfly 15:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NOAM CHOMSKY?

message: Seems to me this article is beyond a "start class" article.  Who should evaluate it and elevate it? --Dylanfly 14:15, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Evaluation/Rating -- Beyond "Start class"

message: "a tool with which George W. Bush exploited nationalism, racism, Christianity, and fear so as to pursue corporate profiteering in the energy sector, pharmaceuticals, armaments, telecommunications, and other key sectors."
Needs to be cut out. ChesterTheWorm (talk) 21:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are you serious? 

message: Biased much? This comment brings down the NPOV of the whole article. I would Really like to ee some citation on that.67.127.174.108 (talk) 18:58, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thatcher a Reactionary? 

message: For such a hot topic. There's been restraint on both sides, and good editing. I would like something I can ethically assign a class, without worrying that I was brainwashing them in either direction. The article makes it clear this is a much cited Marxist theory, not an accepted truth. The article on Gramsci himself could use more of that. Great job, everyone. Profhum (talk) 22:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: So far, remarkably good

message: The style is so laconic as to be unreadable. Give people some verbs and adjectives, and examples they can relate to. What is the point in having an article on this subject that only sociologists want to read? Not only that, it fails to talk about any manifest examples of hegemony as displayed in the Internet Age. McDonald's would be an obvious start, for instance.
-- Jack.henderson.nz (talk) 04:09, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Dense and Impenetrable Writing

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cultural hegemony. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.ram-wan.net/restrepo/hall/The%20problem%20of%20ideology.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100616163619/http://english.nd.edu/faculty/profiles/joseph-a-buttigieg/ to http://english.nd.edu/faculty/profiles/joseph-a-buttigieg/
*Added archive https://archive.is/20121128022033/http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/research/gramsci-journal/ to http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/research/gramsci-journal/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cultural hegemony. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130221181041/http://www.einet.net/review/1302-869793/Rethinking_Marxism_Association_for_Economic_and_Social_Analysis_Home_Page.htm to http://www.einet.net/review/1302-869793/Rethinking_Marxism_Association_for_Economic_and_Social_Analysis_Home_Page.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Gramsci's theory of cultural hegemony is employed in the writings of far-right philosopher Alain de Benoist and is referred to on the Nouvelle Droite page with little elaboration. If anyone with knowledge of the application of cultural hegemony in the ideology of the New Right could assist in the writing of a section in this article on that subject, that would be much appreciated. -- MysteryDoctorCA (talk) 20:26, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: What would be the purpose of including a reference to the New Right in this article? While "theorists" of the New Right may well claim to be adapting Gramsci's theory to their ideology, it certainly doesn't have any impact on Gramsci, or his followers', theorizing on Cultural Hegemony. I'm going to remove the missing information tag. Sunray (talk) 20:54, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information related to the New Right