lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ickwell

message: The link to Churchwarden appears to intend a 16th-century writer named Churchwarden.  But if you click on it, that is not what the article is about, and there doesn't appear to be any article about that person. Michael Hardy (talk) 17:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, 'Churchwardens' accounts' means 'the financial records of the Churchwardens'. The clue is in the position of the apostrophe, but I've added 'the' in front to make the meaning clearer. Xn4 18:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The coordinates shown on the main page take me to a location closer to Old Warden Airfield than to Ickwell. I would fix it but don't seem to be able to. I wanted to put in coordinates that would take the reader to Ickwell Green.
Tupelo the typo fixer (talk) 14:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates
Talk:Mess kit

message: The various descriptions of military mess kits could and should be enhanced with photos, especially when describing older World War II equipment.  Unless one is an aficionado of such items or is over 50 years of age, the reader may never have seen an actual example, and they've become extremely scarce in army-navy surplus stores. —QuicksilverT @ 19:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more photos 

message: *
*
*
*
:....0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  M-1942 mess kits 

message: *
*
*
*
:....0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  German 1931 mess kits 

message: *
:....0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Army 1908 Pattern Mess Tin 

message: *
*
*
*
:....0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Army 1950s Pattern Mess Tin 

message: *
*
*
:....0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 05:14, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Army 2020s Pattern Mess
Talk:Woburn Sands

message: I have added three 'citations needed' markers as the whole history section is unreferenced. Anyone know where this info is from?
Flarp (talk) 22:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: citations needed
Talk:Carroll Mansion

message: A kid posted an article on the house, based on an assignment they'd done for school, but it was speedy deleted as "advertising" (didn't get to see it myself - perhaps it came across as an advert for the non-profit that runs the museum?). Hopefully they'll share their knowledge in a less deletable form now ... --Paularblaster (talk) 02:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which they have now done (via my sandbox). Credit for creating this page should really go to User:Boxer_Rescue; is there any way of reflecting that in the edit history? --Paularblaster (talk) 03:11, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The original (rather over-zealously speedy-deleted) article said 1808; National Park Service says "around" 1811.  Any references to secure the earlier date? --Paularblaster (talk) 03:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date built 
Talk:General Assembly of the Church of Scotland

message: Would it be possible to find a public domain photo of the assembly hall, perhaps with the assembly in session, before the renovations for the Scottish Parliament, i.e. before the seating was circular? I was actually looking for this for the article Sermon on the Mound - better still for my purposes would be a photo of Thatcher speaking to the assembly, but that might be too specific for this article. --Doric Loon (talk) 11:33, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request Image
Talk:IBM 729

message: This article needs clearer information on approximate storage capacities of the system... a single 2400 foot tape could store the equivalent of some 50,000 punch cards doesn't make much sense. -Rolypolyman (talk) 01:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A punched card had 80 columns, each holding one character of data.  That's why terminal windows are still usually 80 columns wide :-)  So "50,000 punch[ed] cards" is about 3.8MiB. RossPatterson (talk) 02:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The exact amount depended on record blocking, i.e how many card images per record. If you only had one card image per record, one tape could only hold about 20800 cards. Most of the tape would then consist of those 3/4" record gaps. And, of course, each character was only 6 bits.  4 megabytes may not sound impressive now, but a couple of tapes held the equivalent of a large file cabinet's worth of punch cards.--agr (talk) 19:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Storage size
Talk:IBM 3850

message: Was this helical storage system prone to jams and failures?  This sounds similar to 8-track cartridges, and those of course had a tendency to become jammed.  I would not trust my data to something like this! -Rolypolyman (talk) 01:54, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it was nothing like 8-track cartridges, and yes, the IBM 3850 MSS was very reliable.  The techniques involved were a combination of well-understood mechanics similar to every 9-track tape drive of its day and most reel-to-reel tapes since, and the helical read/write system which is similar to VHS, U-Matic and other video recording systems.  Now if you want to talk about jams and such, go check out the IBM 2321 Data Cell!  RossPatterson (talk) 02:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliability
Talk:Convertiplane

message: Why don't merging this with tiltrotor?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.18.136.67 (talk) 21:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because convertiplanes includes more than just tilt-rotors, or even tilt wings. - BillCJ (talk) 22:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have an exemple of a convertiplane which is not a tiltrotor ? without one, it seems that convertiplane should redirect to tiltrotor, as all cited plane designs are tiltrotor... 
--Zeugma fr (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Against: To answer the question above, the tiltrotor article distinguishes itself from the tiltwing as a distinct type. The Fairey Rotodyne represents yet a third class of convertiplane where nothing tilts. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 15:29, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: So, I found an article that states that the first functional VTOL airplane was built in Brazil in 1953: https://aeromagazine.uol.com.br/artigo/convertiplano-o-pioneiro-esquecido_491.html
But one that states that the plane's engines weren't "strong enough" (but it's not clear whether or not it managed to fly):
https://tecnoblog.net/meiobit/421362/convertiplano-como-o-brasil-teve-seu-proprio-werner-von-braun/ (this one has a few sources listed)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.181.244.57 (talk) 16:31, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:CCR4

message: This article needs less external links and more article. Please expand. Meisfunny (talk) 02:23, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This page was originally created from User:ProteinBoxBot generated content.  I have now wikified and expanded it and removed the bot generated further reading list so it is hopefully better now.  Cheers.  Boghog2 (talk) 06:37, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. It was in great need of work. It's still fairly small, but not being important, that doesn't matter. What matters is your getting rid of lots of external links, which I thank you for. Meisfunny Oh yeah! 22:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help
Talk:Edith Farnadi

message: I've removed the tag for speedy deletion.  This article needs improvement, and references.  The citation I've added from a quick google search would not save this article if nominated through the AfD processes.  However, it does seem that the subject of this article is a Hungarian musician of some note, and that there are references available.  This topic is a bit out of my area, but should not be speedily deleted. - Michael J Swassing (talk) 01:57, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am a devout fan of Edith Far no adi s music. But I'm curious as to what she was like as a human being. It seems as if there is no biographical information on her save for who she studied with  she concertized, and who she collaborated with but what kind of person was she? Was she outgoing was she an introvert? Was she fun to work with? Did she have any spiritual or political convictions? Did she ever marry? She remains in enigma to me anybody know anything? 2601:194:827F:B840:88D7:F2A2:FA6:EBCC (talk) 04:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was Edith Farnadi?
Talk:Deuce (band)

message: I'm a teacher, I went for a job interview there, the part that says O'Keefe was doing a Foundation Year for Music at the BRIT School is wrong.  It is a comprehensive with lots of funding for Arts subjects.  Foundation year implies it is a University.  I don't want to alter your page though, so I thought I would just say that here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.145.0 (talk) 19:46, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The BRIT School doesn't do foundation years 

message: just responding to your revert of my WP:N tag. WP:NBAND says that a band *may* be notable if it meets one or more criteria. It doesn’t say it *is* notable. That is down to consensus. This article has no sources other than to verify the chart positions - where is the rest of the content sourced from? Are there no sources that would satisfy WP:GNG? Is notability to be only based on it having released material that charted? I would say that is pretty weak notability if so. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: An article having insufficient references does not mean that the group is not notable, or that such references do not exist.  Having a top 10 single in the UK alone, with a song entered into the Eurovision contest, should establish notability.  I edit mainly to add, correct or reference chart positions - I'm less interested in writing or referencing material within the text of an article.  But this is an act that charted on 3 different national charts, performed on TV on major programs in those countries (including Top of the Pops), received national airplay and airing of their music videos on TV in the UK and Australia (and no doubt other European countries).  A group doesn't need to have broken the US (if that's where you're from) to be notable.  I don't think there is any dispute that they meet the notability criteria based on charting in three different countries alone, regardless of how well the rest of the article is referenced.  Citation needed tags would be more-appropriate for this article than a notability tag.Nqr9 (talk) 13:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Vasilissis Sofias Avenue

message: Amalia Avenue has been renamed to Constantinos Karamanlis Avenue since 2006. Also Vasilis Sofias has been renamed to Andreas Papandreou.
Sources:
http://www.tanea.gr//Article.aspx?d=20060620&nid=4446019&sn=&spid=366
http://www.enet.gr/online/online_text/c=112,dt=20.06.2006,id=56720340
http://www.tanea.gr//Article.aspx?d=20060620&nid=4446019&sn=&spid=366  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.130.159.37 (talk) 10:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Conflict avoidance

message: The quote by Bacal completely confuses the issue. Bacal is saying conflict avoidance is the same as avoiding treatment for a disease once it has been contracted. Apart from being a pointless metaphor rather than a solid example that illustrates the subject of the article, Bacal hasn't even managed a sensible metaphor. Avoiding conflict is not the same as avoiding disease. You can often avoid conflict using the similar methods before and during any given conflict. You can rarely use preventative measures to cure disease once you have contracted it. Also, there is no discussion of what conflict prevention actually is, and how it is relevant to conflict avoidance. This quote fails to illustrate conflict avoidance, fails a test of relevance and even fails as a decent metaphor. Maybe I'm just missing the point totally. Can anyone defend it? 203.161.10.6 (talk) 01:57, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, the quote does nothing for the article; if anything, it confuses the reader and can even be seen as muddling the rest of the information in this article. I am going to be re-editing this page for a speech class and would welcome any suggestions. I have not yet decided what exactly to change other than possibly providing further published research and perhaps updated sources of information. No one has voiced opposition to deleting the quote and information which is built upon the quote itself, so I will more than likely be deleting it. Destiel552 (talk) 23:52, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: That quote by Bacal needs deletion

message: Female 41.114.70.72 (talk) 19:11, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Life orientation 

message: — Assignment last updated by Louisdelucy (talk) 00:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Comparative Management Seminar
Talk:C-C chemokine receptor type 7

message: There is a reference made to ECL. Shouldn't it be ELC?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.64.176.241 (talk) 21:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Taken straight from Entrez Gene ()...  But typos at NCBI aren't unheard of -- if you're sure it should be ELC, then make the change (preferably while adding some explanatory text and ideally a reference or two...)  Cheers, AndrewGNF (talk) 21:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  HUGO  give "ELC" (EBI1 ligand chemokine) as alias for CCL19. Even if ECL is used sometimes , ELC is far more common. --Banus (talk) 23:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is stated that:
"Activation of Dendritic cells in peripheral tissues induces CCR7 expression on the cell's surface, which recognize CCL19 and CCL21 produced in the Lymph node and increases dendritic cell expression of co-stimulation molecules (B7), and MHC class I or MHC class II.[8]"
Going to references and reading the article, reference [8] has no mention of B7 or MHC protein complexes, aside from designating mature dendritic cells as HLA-DR high cells. Instead, it mentions that ligation of CCR7 is for chemotactic purposes. I could not find a publication on pubmed making such claims. Can someone provide a proper source for that statement, or change the page to accurately report the results of the article? 
141.151.23.25 (talk) 00:38, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Assesment (Reference [8])
Talk:Caecilianus

message: Is this Secundus of Ptolemais? The date looks right. Biscuittin (talk) 14:15, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No. — LlywelynII 13:59, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secundus, Primate of Numidia and Bishop of Tigisi
Talk:No Way Out (2005)

message: I have decided to expand this article. I am creating it in my sandbox, so don't expect major developments soon! If you have any questions, post them on my talk page, and I'll get back to you. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 18:35, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: Just a small fix, the third part of the Diva Rookie Competition, the Swimsuit Competition, took place before the final round tournament match between Cena and Angle.  It did not take place before the main event match as stated in the article. Lbkid1700 (talk) 16:37, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of event
Talk:Hôtel particulier

message: Is a "maison particulier" in C17 Paris detatched or not? Alexandre Bontemps had one. Johnbod (talk) 02:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Maison particulier

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Hôtel and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 16#Hôtel until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  feminist (talk) 16:38, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hôtel" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:School of Alexandria

message: The Catechetical School of Alexandria...... ~~ There are two Article Pages of the subject where there should be just one. The School developed and grew greatly and was joined by many from East & West. It was in existence before Pantœnus, but he made it famous... The Article Page needs to be re-written. The historical beginnings and development is obscured in the two Article Pages.... MacOfJesus (talk) 15:25, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Accuracy 

message: In the light of the history, The School was destroyed in 381...... Hence, this list must be considered inaccurate, also 'the Chair' was not called; 'Dean'.... So many different factions were claiming the Heads as favouring their opinions that writers of 'Pure History' are best suited to the Article Page.... MacOfJesus (talk) 21:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronological List of Deans
Talk:Chicago stepping

message: Detroit Style Ballrooming is quite distinct from Chicago Stepping although both are part of the African American Partner Dancing Tradition
Afrodiva (talk) 22:47, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2009-09-17/news/0909170167_1_dance-steppin-real-difference Userafw (talk) 03:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible reference/citation for this article
Talk:Christian Connection

message: The article said:
::During the same period, Elias Smith of Vermont and Abner Jones of New Hampshire led a movement espousing views similar to those of O’Kelly. [. . .] Working independently at first, Abner Jones of Vermont and Elias Smith of New Hampshire joined together in their efforts and began exclusively using the name Christian.
The names of the places have been switched. From the article about Abner Jones, I assume that he was the one from New Hampshire.
Mendelo (talk) 12:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Vermont and New Hampshire

message: Does this / how does this group fit with the British Bible Christian Connexion mentioned in the ODNB's biography of Mary Thorne and her father  William O'Bryan (1778–1868), founder in 1815 of the "Bible Christian Connexion". (Sadly subscription needed -  and ) --Tagishsimon (talk) 09:17, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah. Stand down. We seem to have it filed at Bible Christian Church. --Tagishsimon (talk) 09:36, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: British Bible Christian Connexion
Talk:Council of Serdica

message: In December 2014, an editor suggested that the Council of Philippopolis article be merged into the Council of Sardica. —BoBoMisiu (talk) 01:11, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: & The Article Page needs to be re-written.... MacOfJesus (talk) 12:00, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge proposal closed given the consensus against (regarless of whether or not one or both need re-writing). Klbrain (talk) 17:04, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I have before me all the Historical accounts of this important Council..... 
I would like to re-write the Page..... 
MacOfJesus (talk) 14:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Article Page.. 

message: The Historical Accounts all refer to the Council as:  SARDICA..... 
MacOfJesus (talk) 21:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sardica / Serdica (343 - 344).... 

message: I recently read the sections in the books of RPC Hanson and Lewis Ayres on this council. When I began reading this Wikipedia page, I was unsure whether this is talking about the same council. For example, the Council of Sardica in 343 never met, but this article says that it did meet under Hossius. After reading further, I think this is the same council, but many aspects of the description are just completely wrong. AndriesvN (talk) 16:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the right council?
Talk:Asian Academy of Film & Television

message: 'pioneer most Film School' indeed! any proofs?
- Could someone please source the claim that it is "one of the best film schools in the world"? This whole article is basically an advertisement for the school.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.87.199.129 (talk) 03:52, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Early Christian inscriptions

message: This article reads as if it were penned by a Catholic apologist, with zero citations or defences. Most notably, assertions that the veneration of Mary, mother of Christ, can be found in the early inscriptions. 2A00:23C8:6FD7:C801:7CFD:3CE8:488A:F643 (talk) 19:19, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, that's because it's taken directly from the (out-of-copyright) 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia. A lot of the more obscure articles on Christianity are like that; fixing them is a big project. Definitely encourage looking up some sources and making edits!— Moriwen (talk) 19:21, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

text: A pretty odd objection, as the Virgin Mary is mentioned precisely once the article, without any detail. In general the article is pretty free of dates, and often vague about the period it describes - when is "early" exactly?  But at least part of the article covers period centuries after veneration of the VM was dogma. Johnbod (talk) 20:27, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias
Talk:Ecthesis

message: This has to become a discussion here because this is close to becoming an edit war.
"the point you want to make has no reason to be here, as the article clearly states their position"
How does the article otherwise make clear that the Non-Chalcedonians do not teach one divine nature? Deusveritasest (talk) 19:08, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there. I'm sorry (really) if you feel I've been too uncompromising, so I'll try too explain you better what I mean. The reason I find the edit without a good reason to stay is because it honestly seems to me that the non-Calchedonian position is well stated in the sentence: "who were against the idea of the two natures, maintaining that the humanity and divinity of Christ were united in one nature". Frankly, I find that their position couldn't be clearer; what's the point to mention here Eutyches, as both of the parties disagreed with him? This article doesn't even have a link to monophysitism, so for this I don't see why to raise the issue here; I'm certain there are many position the non-Calchedonians disagreed with, we don't have to list them all. Also, the passage has, I must add an apologetic flavour, and there no reason to defend here from an accusation that is not present in the article.Aldux (talk) 19:47, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the problem is the fact that the teaching of one divine nature is identified as explicitly addressed by Chalcedon, and then the Non-Chalcedonians are identified as disagreeing with the ruling of Chalcedon, which, on a very basic level, implies that they disagreed with the ruling against one divine nature, and nowhere is that explicitly denied. Chalcedon is identified as explicitly condemning it, the Non-Chalcedonians are distinguished from Chalcedon, and not identified as explicitly condemning it. The article starts by saying what is definitive of Chalcedon was ruling "that Christ did not possess one divine nature", but "possessed two distinct natures". In response it says that "This ruling was consistently rejected by the Non-Chalcedonians", mentioning explicitly the matter of two natures, but not explicitly addressing the matter of the supposed one divine nature. I am very concerned that this article seems to leave somewhat open the implication that the we are Eutychians. Deusveritasest (talk) 20:18, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe this can be adressed by expanding better on the background and clearing the nature of Calchedon. I'll give it a look tomorrow evening. For now, ciao, Aldux (talk) 20:35, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Against Eutychianism 

message: "... the Non-Chalcedonians considered their schismatic brethren to be more of a threat than any foreign invader."  Is there any reference that supports the claim that the non-Chalcedonians considered Chalcedonians as "schismatic brethren"? rather than say heretics?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "schismatic brethren"