lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Software Freedom Day

message: Cleaned the discussion page and removed the "what happened" and "why this date" sections as I believe both are answered in the main article. Now what to do with the comment on the top of the page and the Wikipedia notability? There are hundreds of press reports worldwide about specific events but none related to SFD/SFI itself as SFI is just the 'global organizer'. Should we just pasted and reference some of the media coverage which can be found @ http://www.softwarefreedomday.org/en/sfd/press-coverage ? Thanks.
:I removed the tag, as the person adding it gave no reason to why he was adding it and clearly did no research on the matter (a drive-by tagging). The above link has a few, but google has a bunch more, particular significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This other article, beyond being a independent source, also show the notability of the subject. Even doing a 1 sec googeling, country specific for Sweden, and I get local computer news paper (old wood style paper) with a article which main topic is Software Freedom Day. We had sun in 2008 sponsorship it, which of course was mentioned in the press. I do not know what more would be needed to prove that it passed the General notability guideline. Belorn (talk) 20:04, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you! (same user as above - maybe one day I'll register :) )  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.121.75.112 (talk) 11:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2012 March update 

message: Can we get clarification on who or what SFI is? It is used three times throughout the article, yet it is never defined nor linked.
Thanks. WesT (talk) 22:43, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is SFI?
Talk:Secondary succession

message: I know fixing is generally preferred to tagging but I don't feel up to tackling this subject myself. (I have no expertise in this field.). Apologies.
178.78.84.245 (talk) 15:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleaned up the repetition. There's still an undue weight problem which needs to be addressed. That and the fact that the article in general is pretty weak. Guettarda (talk) 16:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Imperata grassland

message: The "Vegetation" section and the "Imperata" section vastly overlap. (Also, information in the "Soil" section may belong in the "Imperata" section).
178.78.84.245 (talk) 15:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Repetition

message: The information on Imperata grassland is a good example that helps to illustrate the subject, (I think all the info should be kept), but perhaps more general information or additional examples are needed. Also, only one source isn't specific to Imperata grassland. (It is listed twice; refs. 1 and 2)
178.78.84.245 (talk) 15:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleaned up the repetition. There's still an undue weight problem which needs to be addressed. That and the fact that the article in general is pretty weak. Guettarda (talk) 16:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Undue weight? / Sources
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Agathoclea

message: User:Agathoclea
      run at Mon Dec 18 00:36:45 2006 GMT
Category talk:	11
Category:	24
Image talk:	4
Image:	16
Mainspace	1772
Portal:	1
Talk:	1899
Template talk:	12
Template:	31
User talk:	650
User:	155
Wikipedia talk:	140
Wikipedia:	317
avg edits per article	1.63
earliest	20:44, 27 January 2006
number of unique articles	3094
total	5032
Agathoclea's editcount summary stats as of 00:36 Monday December 18 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 00:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillology/PolishCoA

message: My dear Wikifellows, this is NOT  a contribution of myself AT ALL. 
It is just a useful combination of two different works, (at least), from Emax and Halibutt and the always welcomed presence of our dear Piotr. The recognition of this editing shall be theirs, not mine. It is a  purpose, (only that), to do easier the editing of a Polish coat of arms. Shall we welcome everybody interested on this issue.
If it is not, let me know, I do ask the deletion of this new template myself volunteers.
--Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 00:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A common contribution to Polish heraldry 

message: My dear Wikifellows:
Looking the history of the   Template:PolishCoA structure and Template talk:Infobox PolishCoA as the Proyect Main Page  carefully, I notice that the two works in question are actually from Halibutt alone. Vale!.
 
--Gustavo Szwedowski de Korwin 12:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement
Talk:Nurse education

message: As part of a review of all nursing wikiproject articles, I have changed this article's importance to low per Wikipedia:WikiProject Nursing/Assessment#Importance scale.  I have also added start class. If you disagree, please leave a note here so we can discuss it.  Cheers, Basie (talk) 04:16, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:NURSE]] priority review

message: I propose to merge Student nurse and Nursing school into Nurse education. I think that the content in the Student nurse and Nursing school articles can easily be explained in the context of Nurse education, especially given that much of the content from these articles is duplicated to some extent in Nurse education. I'd rather have a few good articles in WP:NURSE than a wide variety of stubs and start-class articles. I know Nurse education is rated as low, and the others as mid and high respectively, but I believe Nurse education is the better article to merge the others into. Doghouse09 (talk) 00:14, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done the easier one  (Student nurse); the other (which I also support, as there is much there on nursing education in the US) is pending, and I won't be offended if someone else gets to it first! Klbrain (talk) 18:03, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 13:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kyss497 (talk) 17:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I’ve got them!Dawnyshia Griffin figured it out 68.134.140.183 (talk) 07:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: LLIB 1115 - Intro to Information Research
Talk:Waterloo Maple

message: shouldn't we really change the name to Maplesoft? --Theultimatejoeshmo 00:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Feminist history

message: I think these distinctions are nuances, anyway I will link it into history of feminism, because part of that history is the reinterpretation of history --Mgoodyear 00:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this article a good place to write about feminist historicity, that is, thinking through the way history is done? I mean, it talks about finding women in history and thinking through history with gender in mind, but I've read a good deal of feminist scholarship on the subject of what gets construed as history, how truth is established, linear thinking, cause and effect, who gets to be an expert, etc., often in relation to non-traditional biography (Audre Lorde comes to mind) and myth.
If so, great, I'll start work on it in a few days, when I once again have access to my sources (course readers and so on).
BookishAcolyte (talk) 07:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This would be the right place.  Godd luck--Cailil  talk 11:40, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Historicity?

message: I will be working to make this article stronger by adding information on critical race feminism. 
 
--Criticalracetheorist1 (talk) 16:42, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: SSCI2831

message: This article needs work and can be improved by adding information on critical race feminism. 
--Criticalracetheorist2 (talk) 16:43, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: SSCI2831
Talk:Government of the Democratic Republic of Georgia in Exile

message: Some more links should be created to this page, particularly from the relevant articles covering Soviet history. Esn 00:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Links
Talk:Hughes TH-55 Osage

message: The original welded tube airframe and belt-driven transmission designs are still being used as the core to the Northrop-Grumman Fire Scout unmanned helicopter.(MQ-8B)  The engine is a Rolls-Royce (formerly Allison) 250 type engine.  The rotor system has been upgraded to four blades.  (I thought it was a tribute to Mr. Hughes ingenuity, that his original design has lasted, virtually unchanged, all these years.)Mechnicality (talk) 17:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addendum to the TH-55 story. 
Talk:Thomas Jones (mathematician)

message: I do not believe this article establishes its subject's notability. At present its only important assertion of notability is that the subject was a mentor of Adam Sedgwick. Although a "professor with a particularly well-known student may be notable for this reason alone", they must be the primary influence on said student (vide WP:PROF). It seems this is not the case, and that Sedgwick was influenced significantly by at least one other – John Dawson (surgeon). If notability cannot be established within a week or so, I intend to submit this article, along with John Cranke and Dawson, to AFD.--cj | talk 01:05, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Cyberjunkie, Notice that this guy's notability as a priest is probably higher than his activities as a mathematician. The guy obviously made an impact at his time, both as a priest & mathematician, as he has a bust erected at Trinity College and futhermore he made it into the Dictionary of National Biography. I am rather busy and need more time than just a week to tease out more notable details of his life.  This week time limit does no allow the collaborative nature of wikipedia to work its magic. Best regards, bunix 20:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi again Bunzil. Thank you for being so respectful; I realise that I am probably being a pain about this. However, I really can't see that Jones is notable; of course, that doesn't mean he isn't, but the article doesn't make a case either. I'll retract the week time limit, but I hope to see some improvement soon. If there isn't after a reasonable period, I'll look towards AFD again. Thanks,--cj | talk 12:30, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Cyberjunkie, I have just been reading about the history of Trinity College and it seems that you have to be pretty notable to have a bust erected there!  This guy obviously made an impact otherwise they wouldn't go to the trouble of making a statue of him :-) Also to get into the Dictionary of National Biography is notable. Best regards, bunix 21:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Stockholm Palace

message: Skära rummet.
The adjective "skär" means pink and it has nothing to do with the noun "skära" (crescent). The -a ending depends on declension. "Skära rummet" is "The Pink Room" in English. "The Crescent Room" would be "Skärrummet" in Swedish.
94.255.248.64 (talk) 22:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A room 

message: * Most of all I have just translated, I have made very few alterations in the text itself which means that I found that some things are mentioned over and over again in different sections. It might be the practice on SvWP to have all relevant info in each section, but I’m not sure it is the way to do it here. Some pruning may be relevant.
* I struggled a bit about the façade vs. facade, different browsers gave different suggestions for the spelling, so I settled for the spelling in the EnWP article Facade.
* I retained the refs from the original article, only wrote them in "cite template" manner and added some were refs were lacking. Some refs were dead links, but a bit of searching found their new urls, so all but one could be kept.
* Most of the names for halls, rooms or parts of the palace have accepted, English names. Most can be found on the website of the Royal Court or the National Property Board of Sweden, but there are some that I could not find so I had to make my own translation of them. If you see a name that you know the right English version for please change it! The website of the Royal Court uses the plural about most Apartments, so I followed suite. w.carter-Talk 23:16, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some notes on the translation from the Swedish Wikipedia. 

message: I have tried to figure out how to remove the superfluous maps in the info box which only take up space, adding nothing of value to the article. Anyone who wants to know where Stockholm is can easily check that in that article, and we don't need cluttered language like the Stockholm Palace under those maps. Can someone please address this? SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove maps
Talk:Anna Leopoldovna

message: Anna was a Grand Duchess so why isn't she listed as one  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.167.234.162 (talk) 21:43, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: There is simply no chance that this woman's   is this entire title and Anna Carlovna (her EB9 name), Anna Karlovna, and Anna Leopoldovna (her EB11 name) all redirect here, meaning we're violating  as well. Is this formatting due to a (misapplied) policy somewhere on nobles or Russians? or is it just a mistake? Either way, we should fix it. — LlywelynII 00:53, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Chinese Pavilion at Drottningholm

message: I have expanded the article and put in an infobox. I tried to place a "locmapin" in the infobox, but it messed up the placing of the other pics something terrible, so I settled for a separate map a bit below. 
I removed the "stubbox" in the article, but since I'm not sure of what rating the article have now, I have left the rating here at the talk page for some admin to suss out. Also, I put a pipe link at Canton street to the Swedish page. It's a rather lengthy article there, but it is mostly just describing the houses in the community, so not necessary to translate just yet, and I did not want to crowd this article with too many pictures. The list of stolen objects may be a bit controversial to place here in an encyclopedia. But given the reach the English Wikipedia have, wouldn't it be great if some of the objects were discovered because of the Wiki? - w.carter-Talk 12:23, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded 
Talk:Frederick I, Duke of Württemberg

message: Several references are made to him in Shakespeare's The Merry Wives of Windsor, in which a series of anti-German jokes start with a horse theft, several references are made to German travellers in England and to a German Duke who is not expected to come to Windsor. I somewhat doubt this!--Tresckow 01:16, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Antifragmentation

message: I am not an expert in this, but I feel that the word contiguous must be used instead of continuous. Ashu on wiki 01:22, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:15, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Something

message: This page seems unnecessary.  Anyone have a counter-argument? (John User:Jwy talk) 01:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, makes sense to me. I presume you've contacted the person who created this page (and then went about redirecting things all over the place)? —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 04:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I guess I need to provide an argument if I ask about a counter argument - or please point me to a talk page where this has been discussed already.  If the only two things on the dab page are the song and the dictionary definition, then it is redundant with the song page (which has a wikitionary link) and is contrary to the suggestion that Wikipedia is not a dictionary.  I didn't contact anyone - I saw the most active person on the page lists it as a watchlist item on his/her page, so I figured I would hear soon enough. (John User:Jwy talk) 13:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

text: The page has expanded in the last (gack) 13+ years and is now a reasonable Disambiguation Page.  So I believe it is worth keeping now...  --John (User:Jwy/talk) 17:23, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete?

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Something (Beatles song) which affects this page, as it changes an incoming redirect. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 09:04, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Something is a character from Omori (a video game by Omocat). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:bb6:432a:bd00:75d8:e82f:73f:3403 (talk) 2024-03-03T20:18:50 (UTC)
: Thanks, but per WP:DABMENTION, the term must be mentioned at the target page, which it isn't. Paradoctor (talk) 20:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omori character
Talk:Ranka (legend)

message: just wondering, why is this article citing Japanese sources if this is supposed to be a Chinese legend? --little Alex 01:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Specifically, shouldn't the source text actually be in Chinese rather than romanized Japanese? Phyte (talk) 12:20, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup. The page title should probably be changed (WP:MOVED) from "Ranka (legend)" which is the Japanese reading to "Lanke" or "Lankeshan" which is the pinyin transliteration. --Kiyoweap (talk) 21:16, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

text: I agree. Let's move the article after deciding which Chinese spelling is appropriate. --Ypacaraí (talk) 22:09, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese sources?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/bureaucratship

message: In the edit I made a few minutes ago, three minor changes took place. Firstly, I removed the word other from the part about changing user names. If admins can block themselves, it logically follows that a 'crat could change their own username. Secondly, I added the words "this line" to the last line, just to make it clearer what the nominations are to be placed directly below. Thirdly, I added a period at the end of the reminder about tallies in the parentheses. Picaroon 01:28, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tarrasque (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: I removed the reference to the Fallout "Deathclaw" in the "Trivia" section, as it is incorrect; please see http://nma-fallout.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=452924#452924, an interview with a creator of Fallout and the monster in question. SoManyWhales (talk) 08:40, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Trivia

message: Place unformatted & incomplete references here.--Robbstrd 01:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete references

message: Wikipedia is not a Dungeons & Dragons instruction manual, nor should it be an alternative resource in lieu of the former. See What Wikipedia is not. I am editing in accordance with these standards. --Pathogen 02:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Tone

message: The picture doesnt match the description. I know its a hand made model, but the Tarrasque in D&D is an orange-brown color. It even says so in the article. Id say change it to the actual picture used in the 3rd edition book
http://wow.somegate.com/upload/siryl_1189642440_tarrasque.gif  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.78.250 (talk) 22:43, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we're generally disallowed from using stuff which appeared within the books.  A lot of articles used to have images like that years ago, but they were pretty much all removed. 108.69.80.49 (talk) 03:52, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad Picture

message: Article has been tagged for needing sources long-term. Feel free to reinsert the below material with appropriate references. DonIago (talk) 12:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material
Talk:Angel Diaz Nieves

message: Isn't his correct name Angel Nieves Diaz and not the other way round? That is the only reference that I can find on websites of significance. WWGB 01:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is. My bad about that. Someone should merge it with Ángel Nieves Díaz. Thief12 19:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Dan Bryk

message: [Comment removed.] Umrecs 01:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 03:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Naga Regiment

message: Right now this is not an encyclopaedia article, but a eulogy (and not well written either). 87.174.251.229 (talk) 12:29, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs rewriting

message: I think maybe becoz recuirment of naga regiment mostly from nagaland and Manipur 2409:4052:2405:C205:0:0:2B25:C0A4 (talk) 04:05, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can non - naga civillans can join naga regiment ?
Talk:Gaslight Tavern

message: Let's hear some short stories. One of mine: 50 years ago, this month. I lived in a 2nd-floor room, north side, of the house across the street (Oread). My window led to the porch roof. On a good spring day, some would drag the Gaslight juke box outside and play songs, like Louie Louie, Wooly Bully, and a whole lot more. ... In short, we had Be ins in Kansas before S.F. Started to work there later that year (August). jmswtlk (talk) 23:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Stories

message: I'm hoping that someone will fill in the info on the new Gaslight keeping within the Wikipedia NPOV, etc. guidelines. I'm trying to fill in the pieces for the 'older' Gaslight (lived across the street from it in a house on Oread and worked there - yet, will keep the NPOV, etc.). The History section could be several subsections. jmswtlk 21:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The current establishment has closed several times and seems to have a new name, Gaslight Gardens. So, that suggests that the article will focus on the tavern that stood for many years right off the KU Campus on Oread in Lawrence, KS. jmswtlk (talk) 23:59, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Original vs follow ons
Talk:Jay Bakker

message: I know Jay and he struggles with pretty severe Dyslexia, but I can't source anything as its simply personal knowledge. Also Revolution is mostly in Atlanta, GA Novaterata 01:11, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Bakker discusses his Dyslexia in his book, "Son of a Preacher Man" so it would be fine to put this fact in the article and use the book as a reference.  You should probably put it in with the sentence about the book.Slffea 01:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dyslexia 

message: The lead says, "During his young adult years Bakker became disillusioned with mainstream Christianity, becoming particularly critical of Christian fundamentalism and the Christian right." This implies that Christian fundamentalism and the Christian right are part of the mainstream, but they aren't. Mainstream Christianity is generally understood to be synonymous with mainline Christianity, which is neither fundamentalist nor right-wing. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 08:26, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mainstream" 
Talk:Dip (disambiguation)

message: I removed:
* Dip (smashing move), a partner smashes someone else, full phrase is dip dip
It is not self-explanatory; there is no article; a quick Google search turned up nothing relevant. If there is something to this, please either rewrite in a clearer way or write at least a stub with a clear citation. - Jmabel | Talk 01:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smashing