lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WINP-TV

message: If John McCain were not running for President, would the Controversy section be as long as it is?  I think most of that section can be edited down or transferred to a more appropriate article.--Sand Squid (talk) 20:39, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The problems at WQED are (or were) huge, enough so that an entire book was written on the topic - more than eight years ago. WQEX was one of the casualties of this mess, national programming origination from WQED another. There's no reason to edit down something of this severity, and WQEX/WQED are indeed the appropriate articles. --I613 (talk) 05:27, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The citations do not appear to support the language used. The Jerrold Starr article cited at the beginning of the section, for example, does not use the word "bloated," the term "top heavy management" or the phrase "long history of mismanagement." More careful use of sources is imperative. Otherwise, this comes off as a hatchet job that threatens Wikipedia's integrity and credibility. But even with more solid scholarship, I'm sure the writeup could be halved and still make its point. Readers wanting this much detail should buy Starr's book. Allreet (talk) 00:18, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section 

message: There seriously has to be a small section about QEX's legendary and hilarous sign-offs. I don't have the knowledge about their origin and creation, but so many Pittsburghers went to bed smiling and laughing because who expects a comedy sketch for a sign-off? Can anyone help?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:541:200:B:50E:707D:E6E:8AF0 (talk) 07:01, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sign-offs
Talk:WRAZ (TV)

message: Missing 50.3 Information, Sometimes It Is Weather But It Is Showing Some Retro TV Shows Now. KingSparta (talk) 14:15, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing info

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p7FFzr9MjsA
RevinCBHatol (talk) 07:08, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raz the Tiger, channel 50's mascot
Talk:WRDM-CD

message: WRDM-LP was seen broadcasting on channel 50 at 11:00 Eastern Time on 10 February 2007. Seven1672 23:16, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now on channel 50 

message: The FCC data for WDMR-LP says it is on channel 51 in Springfield. 159.53.110.142 12:50, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WDMR-LP on channel 51
Talk:WREX

message: The info box to the right still lists Channel 54 as digital. Since all channels above 51 were taken away from TV this can't be right
99.53.169.153 (talk) 22:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: DTV Channel 54 Reference

message: I don't know why this list keeps getting re-added, but I don't think it's necessary, especially since it's unsourced. Gus PollyTC 07:35, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newscast titles and slogans
Talk:WRIC-TV

message: The FCC does not now, nor has it ever defined TV markets. This is Nielsen who does this. The FCC states in its website it uses Nielsen markets, with Nielsen's permission for some data and enforcement purposes, but markets are strictly a product of Nielsen a private company. 
99.53.169.153 (talk) 20:01, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Markets

message: In late 2016, WRIC finally retired its old logo that was used in some variations for a total of about 26 years since the callsign change from WXEX to WRIC took place in 1990. Does anyone have the image for the station's new logo that was introduced to replace it? J4lambert (talk) 12:22, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: 2016 logo change
Talk:WRLH-TV

message: Does anyone have a source to confirm the location of the original transmitter?  Route 288 wasn't even planned for its current location in 1982 -- as late as 1988 it was planned to go through the center of the village of Midlothian (Mt. Pisgah UMC's front parking lot, to be precise).  The reference needs to at least say "the current intersection", but I'd like sourcing first. VT hawkeyetalk to me 04:07, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original transmitter location: anachronism
Talk:WROC-TV

message: This list should comply with the WP:BLP requirements. I have marked entries as citation needed so that if a reliable source is footnoted it is easy to see the remaining unsourced. Unsourced entries may be removed at any time in line with the WP:BLP guidance. Fæ (talk) 11:39, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsupported list of past personalities 
Talk:WZME

message: Anyone know what's going on with this and provide a reliable source? The only thing I know for a fact is that Verizon plans to drop the channel from my lineup on or after January 1st at the request of the content provider. This is weird because I'm certain that WZME is a must-carry channel. So at first I thought maybe they're shutting down, but the Sonlife rumor is also possible because Verizon already carries Sonlife, so why would they need to carry it twice?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rusf10 (talk • contribs) 07:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Affiliation change or shutting down

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Whai (basketball) which affects "";  points here. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  -- 65.92.247.90 (talk) 04:02, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress
Talk:WSAW-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 00:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: Would use some help updating WSAW-TV, WAOW and WMOW with all the changes these past few days. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:36, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2021
Talk:WSFJ-TV

message: I've tried to view the digital subchannels, but cannot pick them up with an antenna.  Does anybody know why this is? 174.101.22.20 (talk) 03:39, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Digital Subchannels
Talk:WSFX-TV

message: If the article is going to state that several CBS affiliates in adjoining areas covered part of the Wilmington market with a Grade B signal, shouldn't there be a definition of Grade B, or a link to one? JTRH (talk) 20:00, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Grade B"
Talk:WSPA-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article.  cheers  Deconstructhis (talk) 01:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material
Talk:WTAJ-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 14:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material
Talk:WTEN

message: I have requested that this page be moved to WTEN, as that is the FCC-assigned callsign. Could someone move this please? CoolKatt number 99999 01:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Seems to have always been a satellite of WTEN, thus, no independent history. Morgan Wick 07:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested merge: WCDC-TV 

message: I moved WCDC to WTEN's page. I think all of the important information has been transfered, unless there is something else in the WCDC article. I don't know how to delete articles but WCDC should be deleted now. Sam 05:46, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move Finished

message: The use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. — Moe ε 21:24, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use criteria
Talk:WTKR

message: I would love to see this rarely seen 1994-95 logo.
:I saw a tape with the logo... it was blue with "TV" in green and "3" in white, very thin font. Very ugly. Ntropolis 21:07, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1994-95 Logo 

message: Is this really needed? It's the same old station anyways, just they had to change calls in 1981 because of newspaper/television/radio ownership rules. Ntropolis 22:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Succession box

message: Is he still there?  WAVY 10 17:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tal White 

message: I noticed this morning that 'TKR didn't air the first hour of CBS' The Early Show. WAVY 10 19:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The Early Show]] 

message: Someone please email the station and ask for the revised logo.Ntropolis 01:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, will the logo that I uploaded work? - Flatsky 01:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That'll work for now, better than the screencap even though it isn't the one they use on-air (that one is the one in the TMZ on TV ad that appears on their website). Logos with a regular white background work best. Ntropolis 20:17, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 
Talk:WTLJ

message: I think that a more appropriate listing in the "Broadcast television in the Grand Rapids/Kalamazoo-Battle Creek/Muskegon area" section of this and similar pages would be:
WTLJ 54 (TCT)
with a link to http://www.tct.tv/
rather than:
WTLJ 54 (TBN)
It seems to me that this station is not "an affiliate of the Trinity Broadcasting Network" to the extent that the major commercial networks have "affiliates".  WTLJ does broadcast some programming from TBN, but it seems to be more of a cooperative effort between TCT and TBN than a direct relationship between TBN and WTLJ.Ac44ck 06:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link
Talk:WTLV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article.  cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 14:11, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: First Coast News debuted a new logo combining the ABC and NBC logos in the fall of 2017. The new individual station logos are as follows:
* A logo containing the letters NBC, a number 12, and the NBC peacock next to the callsign for WTLV.
* A logo containing the ABC logo and the callsign for WJXX.
Does anyone have any of those new logos? J4lambert (talk) 21:52, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo change necessary
Talk:WTOV-TV

message: update was made on 01/13/07 to fix Infobox that was completely messed up and was messing up the entire page.  No info was changed, just fixed.
-SVRTVDude 16:38, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Did you know that WTOV-TV has a small substudio in the bar at the Hampton Inn in St. Clairsville, Ohio. There's a little glass studio box with WTOV written on it. The studio has a majestic view of the Ohio Valley Mall. Just so's you know. 67.17.172.42 (talk) 13:07, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be their Belmont County Newsroom. I think it's right next door to Undo's. Darkpower (talk) 21:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The bar at the Hampton Inn
Talk:WTPX-TV

message: It appears that this page's history is split between the WTPX article itself and the WTPX-TV redirect.  This appears to be due to a copy-and-paste move made by  back in April, to remove the "-TV" suffix from the article title (when it could have simply been moved back, I can't find any indications of any edits to the WTPX page when it was the redirect and not the article).  Could this be fixed? --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken history 
Talk:WTSP

message: While WTSP officially switched to CBS on December 12, 1994, WTVT began dropping CBS programs in stages to accommodate expanded local newscasts. The Price is Right began airing on WTSP when its 22nd season began in September 1994, but the remaining programs on the CBS schedule did not move until December. 2600:4808:5F3:400:E1C4:A745:F59C:623A (talk) 22:18, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Programming repercussions in the wake of the 1994 affiliation switch
Talk:WTTG

message: Something needs to be said about the recent internet video of the lady falling on air. http://youtube.com/watch?v=90m2Xw_Haj0&search=grape%20fall Deltro 12:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Grape Fall

message: I noticed some revert wars regarding the Fox branding on several articles on Fox-owned stations. The official name of the network is not all uppercase, but that is how the company prefers it.
So, do we call it "Fox" or "FOX"? You decide. CoolKatt number 99999 02:26, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Fox" or "FOX"?

message: Over the last couple of weeks, WTTG has been running promos announcing the upcoming addition of "Movies!" to digital subchannel 5.2.  It will be WTTG's first digital subchannel.
More info about "Movies!":
http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/491563-Fox_O_Os_Weigel_Launch_Movies_Digi_Net.php
Broadcasting is supposed to commence on Memorial Day weekend.
Looking for a verifiable source that specifically mentions WTTG, although it seems to be a fait accompli.
GodaiNoBaka (talk) 15:12, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enter Movies! 

message: The May 21, 1945 issue of Broadcasting on page 78 mentions W3XWT signing on using the now defunct channel 1. Dewdude (talk) 01:03, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Channel 

message: If you want proof that Fox 5 used to air MGM/UA movies, watch this YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUVz8RhiPVI
RevinCBHatol (talk) 05:06, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  MGM/UA Premiere Network
Talk:WTVE

message: WTVE's FCC DTV status report claimed in early Oct 2008 that the station would be ready to shut down analogue within a month and Fybush.com indicates that WTVE had obtained permission to do exactly that as the klystron analogue transmitter was close to failure. Unfortunately, I don't see anything on the station's website to confirm either this or the bankruptcy sale of WTVE to WRNN-TV's owners, as the station site hasn't been updated in years. Is it time to remove "A - 51" from the page yet? --66.102.80.212 (talk) 06:16, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Aah, I just rode through the area yesterday and forgot to check.  I do know the digital is on the air from Reading and Lebanon, though the DTS transmitter in Bethlehem is not on the air it seems. TripEricson (talk) 15:35, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is analogue 51 gone? 
Talk:WTVF

message: Is this list really necessary? --Zpb52 23:28, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of station personalities 

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article.  cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 21:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:Alexina Louie

message: Possible original research, moved from main (needs source):
As of 2006, she is a composer-in-residence at the National Arts Centre in Ottawa and debuted her new composition Infinite Sky With Birds On February 22nd.  This new composition was unlike anything Louie has ever done.  It is characterized by its speed and more extensive use of the brass section.
Rewster 08:15, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infinite Sky with Birds  