lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Superprofit

message: Superprofit (or surplus profit or extra surplus-value; in German: extra-Mehrwert), is a concept in Karl Marx's critique of political economy, subsequently elaborated by Lenin and other Marxist thinkers.
Comment: 'extra-Mehrwert' is NOT the same thing as superprofits!
While 'extra-Mehrwert' has to do with above-average surplus-value obtained through, i.e., technological advantages in a company or sector of the economy that the competitor does not have (yet), superprofits refer specifically to profits obtained by the imperialist/colonial bourgeoisie in their exploitation of work force in the dependent, by imperialism dominated, countries.
What is going on in this article? Did someone try and post a comment in the actual body of the article instead of using the talk page? If this can be fixed it would be awesome - otherwise, I'll try and do surgery on my own.
ManicParroT 01:36, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This whole article is problematic.  It appears to confuse "super profits" with "super surplus value", which are technically different.  It lumps together some very different cases.  The issues analysed by Lenin have nothing to do with the examples given by Marx.  It has very few citations, and a lot of the material seems to be the individual opinions of contributors.  I wonder if this article should just be removed.--Jack Upland (talk) 09:44, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problematic 

message: There are grammar mistakes in the reference section, i.e., "Investor-partner business parter finder business dictionairy, that I do not know how to correct.
Nantucketnoon (talk) 17:59, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: I agree with above comments that extra-surplus value and superprofits are not the same thing. There are also some other issues with this article which have not been mentioned, for example the criticism section (entirely unsourced), which seems to be criticising the concept of a labour aristocracy rather than superprofits themselves, which are relatively uncontroversial. I will try to improve the above aspects in time unless there are objections.Mirkyton (talk) 10:06, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, however I see little reason why this page should not just be deleted. Cheddagedda (talk) 02:46, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section and confusion
Talk:Batman: Nine Lives

message: This article contradicts itself: "Though Batman still exists, members of his rogues gallery appear as normal criminals rather than mutated, disfigured or technologically enhanced characters. .... Matt Hagen, a disfigured gangster called Clayface". -86.142.109.209 19:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Updated the listing to match IGN's update.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.26.177.51 (talk) 07:54, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical Reception
Talk:Wild Waves Theme Park

message: "Amphitheater (overlooking the water)which books the greatest national bands such as the newest sensation Squish of Portland Oregon."
This quote looks like it's either POV (probably copy-pasted), or it's some random band that's doing some "viral marketing", aka wiki-spam. It seems User:72.11.127.221 and User:154.20.26.54 made these edits (The External Link, and the POV text, repectively). Any ideas? 
Stale Fries 01:37, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: FYI, to edit your wiki links as you see fit, articles now exist on the following as shown:
*PARC Management, the official name of PARC 7F Operations.
*CNL Income Properties, without the "Inc.".
Please update your links. Thanks. ClarkCT 05:45, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PARC Ownership 

message: I've made a few changes:
*A guest user had previously edited in some poorly written information about the other parks with the CNL purchase, so I've revised that.
*I've reorganized most of the paragraphs for easier understanding.  
*I've also updated and added some more citations concerning the Six Flags sale.  
*Added the Amusement Park Infobox template.  I live within close proximity of the park, so if I can find time to get there in the summer, I may be able to get an image.
*I will be soon adding more updated information about the rides.  
Sherwelthlangley 06:38, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: Now I tried adding a separate page for the Timberhawk but it was not approved for reasons such as "not being a fit topic for Wikipedia". But it seems it should be fit for a page if Adrenaline peak in Oaks park is. I just need approval on adding the page which I gladly will if need be 4Corry11 (talk) 17:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seperate Page for Timberhawk 

message: Something's very haywire with the opening date and I don't think it's my brain... Back when I was in high school I remember very clearly that the kids were really excited about going to wild Waves. And I was invited to go with them. But it was too expensive for me at that time. This is what I remember. The problem is that I graduated in 1976, so how could the park have opened in 1977? 24.17.129.156 (talk) 18:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glitch in The matrix... Opening date 1977 that can't be right
Talk:Robert W. Morgan

message: What a wonderful public relations piece.--Barryboyn 01:39, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While I can appreciate the large repository of Robert W. Morgan airchecks that ReelRadio offers on their website the fact is that to access them requires the user to a paid subscription fee and I believe that under Wikipedia's rules such websites are disqualified from being listed because they solicit a user to pay a monetary fee to access their content. Simon Bar Sinister (talk) 21:13, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ReelRadio website in External links 

message: Completed a copy-edit. Reorganized the article to better conform to the Biography template.  Added an Infobox.  Removed NPOV tag after removing inappropriate text. However, the thing still reads more like an industry bio than an encyclopedia article.  This article is widely linked, and it seems like the fellow was fairly influential; it's a shame that this article is so shallow.  Heck, if the man weren't dead, the article would be flirting with deletion under the policy, since it's got no references.  Please, somebody who knows radio, flesh out this poor article! // Macwhiz (talk) 00:44, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit 

message: MANY DJ's hosted ATK, including Charlie Van Dyke (KHJ), Gary Owens and many others. Morgan wasn't one of "only three".
There are no citations in this article and it seriously needs to be fixed. https://at40fg.proboards.com/thread/1642/list-at40-guest-hosts
2601:8C0:801:460:D84D:D78D:63FB:162E (talk) 15:47, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Guest Hosts for American Top 40 
Talk:Abusive relationship

message: I'm suggesting this to be merged because these are essentially the same thing. Mapletip 01:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes merge into relational aggresssion.--Ziji 09:24, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I merged these today as per WP:BOLD. Bearian 00:45, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:High Falls, New York

message: I've attended several meetings by and with the Rochester Historic Preservation Commission about the creation of an Alligerville historic district.  No representatives from Marbletown or Rosendale have ever been present, and no reference to High Falls has ever been made, because Alligerville is not part of High Falls.  I am removing that assertion.--~TPW 20:45, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alligerville in Rochester?
Talk:Mechanical Beasts

message: Jet Fire P1 is also called Ashura P1 or even Ashler P1 in some translations. I tried to make the translation issue clear at the beginning of the section. The same applies to brothers S1/S2, who are called brothers Blazas S1 & S2 in other translations. --Mikaine 01:59, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't there one entry missing? I'm positive there were two monsters in episode 91, one of which is shown. Gladrius 03:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Monster

message: I believe that the gallery of images of mechanical beasts is useful, and falls under fair use since all of the images are attributed and are not used in an infringing manner. They should stay unless someone can add to this discussion explaining how they violate copyright. Luvcraft 16:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the Wikipedia fair-use policy, in particular the third and eighth points, which say, "The amount of copyrighted work used should be as little as possible" and "The material must contribute significantly to the article (e.g. identify the subject of an article, or specifically illustrate relevant points or sections within the text) and must not serve a purely decorative purpose." Galleries of unfree images have generally been determined to fall afoul of these points of the policy, because they are simply collections of unfree images that are not used to illustrate specific points within the text. There is no textual criticism, commentary, or analysis of these images. Wikipedia is not a repository of images, and is especially not a place for a collection of over a hundred unfree images such as the gallery in this article. —Bkell (talk) 06:13, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Then I suggest one or both of the following: 1) Adding technical information to go with the pictures given. 2) Do so only for machines directly referenced in other Wikipedia articles or that have had multiple or iconic appearances in the series. -- Majin Gojira 01:08, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyrighted images in the gallery
Talk:Palaeocastor

message: Beyond the obvious, there are a few problems with the artist's rendition.  The "horn" was in no way as obvious as in the image.  This isn't Ceratogaulus.  Also note that this was a burrowing animal, not an aquatic and the flattened beaver tail is also inappropriate.  --Aranae 02:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A better picture would be helpful - as it looks like a hoax the way it is now. --Trödel 04:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I have contacted the curator of that museum and he will provide some of the images under a cc-by-sa license (he is sending higher resolution versions) --Trödel 22:44, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Artist's rendition

message: The name Thomas barbour should read Edwin Hinkley barbour. Thomas Barbour was 9 years old in 1893. 12.43.6.77 (talk) 03:17, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palaeocastor
Talk:Hillside, New York

message: Uh ... where exactly is this place? I live near Ulster County and I don't think I've ever heard of it. Could someone be more specific about what town it's in? Daniel Case 02:01, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind ... did it myself, in the true Wiki way. Daniel Case 02:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah, no. it's an historic inn in wyoming county. Ann Burlingham (talk) 08:10, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sirius XM Love

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. For some background see move log of  and his activities. (non-admin closure) –Ammarpad (talk) 13:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: SiriusXM Love →  – Zacharycook's recent spate of illogical and contradictory RM proposals did have the effect of causing us to notice some inconsistency among our articles about Sirius XM channels: while the vast majority of them have a space between Sirius and XM, a few (including this one) do not. In discussion, WP:WPRS determined that while the company's logo stylizes its name as SiriusXM without a space, in text the company is consistently referred to as Sirius XM with a space, even in its own press releases about itself. Accordingly, this should be moved to Sirius XM with a space. Bearcat (talk) 15:03, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 January 2018
Talk:Lunatic Express

message: Will add something from Bill Bryson's "African Diary" about his 2002 trip on it. And keep seperate, as a "named train"; does it have an official name? It should be categorised under Kenya as well as Uganda; does it still go through to Uganda? Hugo999 (talk) 06:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bill Bryson

message: There was a movie about man-eating lions on a railway being built by the British in Africa. I wonder whether this railway is the one of the Lunatic Express. --DThomsen8 (talk) 20:33, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie about man-eating lions
Talk:WEFT

message: I see a number of changes have been made to the WEFT page - one assumes to make it meet some standard developed by someone somewhere. It would have been better to send a message to those who maintain the page and tell them about some evolving plan/standards regarding radio station pages rather than drop in unannounced and make changes which may or may not be accepted by maintainers. 
Some info presented has been there for years and for a reason. It has been written by those of us in the WEFT listening area. For instance the ERP info was changed but it contained critical information. Salient acts about the station have been removed and labeled promotional when the content can be easily verified by visiting the WEFT website linked to in the article.
I and others locally will plan to back out some of your changes in the week ahead.
Ifmemoryserves (talk) 15:28, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits to article
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Taiwan

message: There has been continued discussion and failure to reach consensus on whether Taiwan should be called a "country" or "state" on the Taiwan article: Talk:Taiwan#Taiwan...is_a_country? I've opened an RfC to come to consensus. User:Stephen Balaban - 9:59, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Taiwan, "country" or "state" 

message: Hi, I'm letting this WikiProject know that there is currently a proposal to merge the Spanish East Indies article into the Captaincy General of the Philippines article at its talk page since at some point in the 1600s part of the island was occupied by Spanish forces based in the Philippines. Your participation in the discussion would be very appreciated. Thank you! Borgenland (talk) 13:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merging of Spanish East Indies to Captaincy General of the Philippines 

message: Please join the discussion here: Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_March_24#Category:Expressways_in_Taiwan_Province,_People's_Republic_of_China. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Taiwan Province, People's Republic of China" 

message: (謝南光),  (王白淵)
Dear WikiProject Taiwan,
I came across two articles written by a student, both zh-to-en translations. It may be of your interest to give feedback on their talk pages and to refine them. Both figures were from Taiwan. The translations are not outstanding at the moment, mostly because their original mandarin articles are not satisfying, so please feel free to be bold and make edits.
Xie (Hsieh) was a member of the Taiwanese People's Party who later went to PRC in 1952. Wang was a poet and literary who was arrested in the February 28 incident. 
My sincere thanks to you all. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 12:21, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  These two articles may be of your interest 

message: needs populating with games that are not just from mainland China. It was nominated for deletion as a duplicate of a PRC-only videogame category. -- 65.92.244.143 (talk) 06:19, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: {{lc|Chinese-language-only video games}}

message: Those 4000ish years of entries are also the most prominent use on the project of the system. They're possibly the most common use of the system in the English language. So... what's it actually called? The year infoboxes use "Minguo calendar", our article is at "Republic of China calendar", and Ngram thinks neither is remotely as common as "ROC era" (albeit with most of those uses talking about the ROC era of various places and topics as specifically the years 19121949). Whatever the   for the system is, it's what we should be using for both the page and the 4000ish infoboxes. — LlywelynII 20:05, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Side point (Minguo era naming)
Talk:Pine Hill, New York

message: I saw the outstanding citation needed references, and did what I could to remedy that.  Two of the sources I used ( and ) both appear to have more info on the area if anyone cares to add to the article. Caidh (talk) 23:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested sources for more info 

message: This information seems incredibly dense and not that immediately relevant to the article. I would argue to report population and some other key data and refer readers to the source (reference) for more granular information. Thoughts? AlSwearengen (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:54, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics
Talk:The Lover (play)

message: The only references to the existence of this person are in this article and One for the Road (Harold Pinter play).  The edits are poorly written, incorrectly placed and misformatted.  Looks spammish.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.68.128.6 (talk) 19:22, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Knight R. Crow
Talk:Saugerties South, New York

message: Uh, I've lived in Saugerties for 36 years (3 years in the southern part of town) and have never heard anyone use the term Saugerties South.  We who live here usually refer to parts of town by hamlet name, such as Mount Marion or Blue Mountain or "the village."  The only instance I know of where a part of town is referred to by compass direction is West Saugerties, also a hamlet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.161.6.62 (talk) 11:43, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:USS Valdez

message: In 1945 the USNS (United States Naval Ship) Jose Valdez was launched.  So the Valdez in this article is not the first Navy shipped named for a person of Spanish descent.  Let’s not forget the Admiral Farragut was Spanish. (Farragut, properly pronounced “Farra-goot”). There may be other earlier ships so named.98.162.136.248 (talk) 14:32, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Alexander Solonik

message: While the recent edits by 75.180.173.129 have added a lot of information, two things have come to my attention. 
A) The Page has lost it's format (stub template, and then more article).
and B) The recent addition is completely cut and pasted from here.
Being new to wikipedia, I don't know if I should immediatly remove these edits or what... Please help.
--Loki Laufeyson 02:25, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Copied from this website. Genjix 11:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Heres some more sources NewsFromRussia The Independent. Genjix 11:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits... 

message: I went in and updated the syntax- I do agree that the page appears to have been written by a 14 year old, and probably a fourteen year old with only minimal English skills.
I took the liberty of switching "whacked" to "eliminated" or other appropriate terms, avoiding such fun but non-encyclopedic terms such as "iced", "sleeping with the fishes", etc. This page needs a picture, I think, and it needs to be better divided for better readability. I am canceling the "non-encyclopedic" banner, but I will replace it with a "cite sources please" banner. RSido 02:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  fixes! 

message: Here's another example of an article that went from good to alot worse since the wide masses got on Wikipedia, good edits drown in an ever increasing amount of bad edits, as more and more people find their way here. As it it now, it blows. Last time I read this was in July 2007, it's gotten alot worse since then...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.56.243.238 (talk) 13:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article blows 

message: Barely any credible citations, filled with 'rumors', it all seems like it was written by(and I hate to quote the thread below me) a fanboy who wanted to make his idol famous. IdanElh (talk) 21:08, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is a mess
Talk:Pseudo-Aristotle

message: Pseudo-Aristotle is a general cognomen for authors of philosophical or medical treatises who attributed their work to the Greek philosopher Aristotle, or whose work was later attributed to him by others.
This sentence appears to have been cut and paste far and wide all over the internet, pressed into service wherever "Pseudo-Aristotle" is first introduced. 
The other similar case I'm aware of is Nicolas Bourbaki, a collective pseudonym initiated by French mathematicians Henri Cartan and André Weil. The term "cognomen" does not occur in that article (nor the more apt "general cognomen" if this were the established term). 
The notion of a "general" cognomen does not seem to be specifically defined in the major dictionaries (few of which made it into my search results for queries including the word "define"). 
In ten hard minutes on Google, 80% of what I was able to dig up only reinforced my initial concern over citogenesis, but this is not really my dog, so I'll leave it for the next editor to make a judgement call. 
For myself, "pseudonym" is a bit weak in the collective sense and I'm inclined to wish that "general cognomen" was indeed the accepted term ("collective pseudonym" seems heavy and invented on the fly). However, my opinion as an editor of Wikipedia is properly for the birds. — MaxEnt 15:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "General cognomen" as citogenesis
Talk:Ion transporter

message: We have a dab-link to it, but it doesn't exist. D'oh:( DMacks 02:33, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ion pump (physics) was delested for copyright violation:
Deletion log
* 10:40, 26 October 2006 (aeropagitica) (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Ion pump (physics)" (copyrighted material.)<BR>--JWSchmidt 02:37, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ion pump (physics)]] 

message: I propose that we move this page to Ion transporter.  I'll do this move myself in a couple days if no one objects.  delldot | talk 07:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, no one objected, so I'm going to move it.  We can discuss it or move it back later if necessary.  delldot | talk 01:39, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: — Assignment last updated by Hmwhite9 (talk) 13:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Cell Biology Honors
Talk:Tranceport (album)

message: Is this REALLY techno?
More trancey.
The Ronin 02:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Techno Album

message: One of the reasons it did not make the UK Compilation chart might possibly have something to with the fact that - as the Discogs link quite plainly shows - it was not released in the UK.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.73.26 (talk) 08:58, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wild guess here