lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cam'ron discography

message: Who keeps editing that Killa Season didn't go Gold?
Killa Season did go gold, it used to be on the RIAA site, but many albums are now off the site due to faults with RIAA site.
Whoever says it did not go gold is a big dickhead.
It's still not officially Gold on http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH. Spellcast 18:53, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope you know that RIAA certification and U.S. sales are different things. It may have sold 500,000, but that doesn't mean it's automatically certified. It's up to the record company to officially apply for the plaque. And how do you know it was taken off the site? It sounds like a cover up. Spellcast 21:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Commodore admiral

message: So what's the abbreviation for Commodore Admiral? CADM? CDREADM? CDRE? COMO? COMOADM? 132.205.44.5 23:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: abbreviation

message: The rank insignia would be nice. 132.205.44.5 23:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rqimg 

message: Support the proposed merge, make this page a redirect. Arnoutf 20:50, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Store Bededag

message: Does this holiday have an equivalent in any English-speaking country? If yes, what is it called? -- 62.156.45.41 (talk) 04:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Equivalent? 

message: This article really should be "Store bededag" (as opposed to the current "Store Bededag") as Danish orthography prescribes this spelling. Compare the relevant entry in the official Danish orthographical dictionary and also § 12, (13), c in the official Danish orthographical rule set. --Pinnerup (talk) 12:32, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation
Talk:Halloysite

message: Listing every country listed on another web site is pointless at best, and in fact damages the article by making it cumbersome. It is a lazy addition, just copied from another easily found web site and shows little or no understanding by the contributor - but that's Wikiepdia for you. The list adds nothing and should be editted down.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.217.9 (talk) 22:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup - removed. Vsmith 22:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Localities
Talk:Memento Mori (short story)

message: I am doing this project for a history class. I plan to add more information about the psychology applications and how anterograde amnesia affects memory. 
Leahym1 (talk) 16:39, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what you mean exactly. Are you referring to the fact that only the first reference for each person refers to their page and any other ones are not linked? This is the standard practice. If that is not the question, could you elaborate on what you fin inconsistent?AbramTerger (talk) 20:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding Links

message: I understand that someone is doing a assignment on this article, but please keep the revision marks off the page. In a hurry you can use your own user page to preview edits and store content. I'm going to abstain from correcting the article at this time, because someone can consider it rude, but if this content doesn't improve, I will revert it. --  Antonio Carlos Porto (talk) 06:54, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags and revision marks in the article 

message: The reference list appears to be formatted incorrectly. I'm not really sure how to fix it, and I'm too busy to work it out now. Maybe someone should take a look and fix it up?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.39.173 (talk) 11:18, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: it got fixed when I removed the references added to the ref list that went with the section that was deleted. The "references" were not added in the article (as they should be) but were added to the reference list directly. The reference list adds them automatically.AbramTerger (talk) 12:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I don't see the relevance to the information on Anterograde Amnesia in this article. It seems irrelevant to me and at most should just link "anterograde amnesia" to the relevant wiki-article. [It seems akin to having an article on Hamlet with a section on Danish History or causes of attempted suicide]AbramTerger (talk) 12:46, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background on Anterograde Amnesia
Talk:Had I but known

message: I've removed the reference to Lovecraft, since I'm reasonably familiar with his work and wouldn't exactly call him a primary example of this form of construction.  I've only ever heard the HIBK tag applied to female Golden Age mystery writers and the Nash poem seems to bear that out.  
Does anyone have this Nash poem available such that they could fill in the last two lines -- which, by my poor memory, are approximately
"Does anyone wish to buy a mystery which I am sorry to say I did not rent, but owns?
I wouldn't have bought it had I but known it was full of had I but knowns."
I think that would be an appropriate way of ending off this article. Accounting4Taste 23:37, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: HIBK is mostly about Golden Age mysteries

message: The article states specifically that the device relies on the first-person narrator. Yet, the same effect can be achieved with the a third-person narrator: "Had he but known ...  he would not have set foot in that house".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.208.130.181 (talk) 05:38, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrative mode 

message: Can someone clarify the opening paragraph?  It doesn't make sense to me. It says that an HIBK narrator laments a course of action, as a form of foreshadowing (which would be before the consequences unfold).  But then it says that the narrator does not explain the mistake until after the consequences are realized.  How can it be both before and after?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.220.117 (talk) 16:25, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification Needed
Talk:Wafer fabrication

message: I wasn't sure what to do with this article submission, so I declined it.  If it is notable, please feel free to merge the content in here or create a new article.  Wikipedia:Articles for creation/2006-04-15#RCA clean.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 23:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: RCA clean
Talk:Dragons' Den (British TV programme)

message: I am looking at this Wikipedia article because I am interested in the latest series, but discovered a gap in the data for the series. Please may someone update this so it useful for readers wishing to learn more about the current series. Best wishes, User:Saturn Lover!🪐 Saturn Lover! (talk) 17:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please may someone update all data to include Series 18 so far? 

message: I noticed some details were recently left as as 'unknown' and others blank; missing info such as what episode. Please search for the entrepreneurs feedback on their appearance/s as well as trusted sources which may well have left a review within a week of the episodes broadcast, using the date the article was posted and then judging by 'last weeks episode/sunday's ep, etc' you can find the episodes broadcast date easily via the ratings column on the page or the BBC dragons den website. 
On companies house statuses, most companies based in Ireland are unavailable on the website but can be found on https://companycheck.co.uk/. Sometimes the names are slightly different so may require some digging of the person who appeared on the show via companies house, suffixing the locations they operate mentioned on the show or feedback posted since.
When no website is available or the link is now dead, please use N/A in the column as oppose to leaving it blank.
Hope this helps
ToonIsALoon (talk) 13:41, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advice for adding info to pitches tables 

message: # Companies House does not verify the content submitted to it.
# That a company remains on the register doesn't mean it's actively trading. It can be dormant, or filing penny returns.
# Even if we assume all the content is accurate and reflected active trading status, it's all  whenever the editor last checked the source. That's ~600 refs which can potentially be outdated. After all, a company can stop trading (and I suspect many of these marked as 'active' have, and probably don't have long lifespans anyway).
ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 01:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive use of Companies House, list impossible to maintain anyway 

message: What happened with S18E5, the rejected offer about chewable tooth paste? I had no idea that was a thing and I hate thinking that I use too much paste, basically I’m spitting money down the sink. 2A02:2455:4E0:BA00:459A:34EC:6BBE:8BE6 (talk) 21:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, if you want to find feedback on how the company is doing since broadcast it's best to search yourself. It's not always possible to house all info on how the company has done since, but following my completion of on-going updates to previous series I will look to add to the successful people column on businesses that exceeded expectations. ToonIsALoon (talk) 22:24, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  S18E5 - chewable tooth paste 

message: Teirnan McCorkell has no bio page here on Wikipedia ?
He also does extremely popular flooring videos online Dartplayer Tim (talk) 10:33, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teirnan McCorkell Series 17 Episode 5
Talk:Cryoablation

message: URGENT NEED TO MERGE ARTICLES CRYOSURGERY, CRYOABLATION AND CRYOIMMUNOTHERAPY
Out of three larger articles: Cryosurgery, Cryoablation and Cryotherapy, the first two deal with exactly the same subject, without any mutual reference. They should be merged into one article. The third article (Cryoimmunotherapy) covers a small subject, which also should be included in the merged article.
Another article: Cryotherapy  overlaps that field only partly, so it should stay separate, but cross-referenced. 
Such merging is really urgent, since these articles deal with little-known but important aspects of cancer treatment - now in a confusing way.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.51.77.190 (talk) 18:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

message: Cryoablation is far more general than its use in heart-related maladies --it's used in wart treatments and a variety of surgical uses. --Bobak 23:49, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right now the page is far too narrow 

message: Is Cryoablation the same or different than Cryoblation???
If they are the same thing, then something needs to be clarified about there being two spellings, because I've been given reason to believe that "Cryoblation" is NOT a mis-spelling. 
If they're NOT the same, then that also needs to be clarified.
LP-mn (talk) 21:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cryoablation versus Cryoblation??? 

message: The section on breast cancer treatment by cryoablation does not provide a reference to substantiate the claim that Obamacare regulation has caused cessation of work on breast cancer treatment.  Can someone please provide such a reference?  108.65.32.10 (talk) 03:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obamacare/ACA
Talk:Conservative Future Scotland

message: Although a short article, I don't think this one needs very much in the way of expansion. There are the basic details, as much of a history as a recently created organisation can have and an explanation of what it is. What more is there that would be encyclopaedia-worthy to write about here? --Breadandcheese 23:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: Google News search does not find any references of more than a passing nature (i.e., not "significant coverage" as defined in the notability guideline. The first several pages of hits generated by a normal GSearch do not, either. The references added to the article today do not meet that standard, either. Bongomatic 08:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 
Talk:Millioctave

message: What sort of audio example should be added to the article? Hyacinth (talk) 01:31, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio
Talk:Septimal kleisma

message: This is "original research" (to use a euphemism), without sources or references. Good luck finding any references outside of a kind of ex-nihilo-hall-of-mirrors on the Internet, created by self-appointed "music theorists", but if you do, please put those references into this page. Frank Zamjatin (talk) 13:06, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't really matter to me. I guess I just don't understand deletionism. Pfly (talk) 00:27, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research
Talk:Septimal semicomma

message: I have added an audio example to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 08:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 13:22, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag removed. Hyacinth (talk) 18:43, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: This score is not consistent with the intervals stated in the article. A minor third up from Gb is Bbb (Fonville 1991, p. 114 – a minor third is 1 step up and left on the table). I understand a septimal minor third above that is notated as Dbb7. Burninthruthesky (talk) 08:57, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Score
Talk:Diesis

message: Going up by 3 major thirds from C, steps to E, G#, and B#. So indeed the defect from B# to C(8va) is rightfully a diminished second. However the picture shows Dbb to C. This notation is inconsistent with the explanation. This is also a diminished second, but the wrong one. −Woodstone (talk) 13:04, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note designation in picture 

message: I double-checked the table on page 26 in Rameau's Treatise on Harmony and determined that, based on the 15552:15625 product as well as the omission of 148 in five-limit tuning, the ratio "125:148" is a typo for "125:128", hence my insertion of the sic note in the text. -- Glenn L (talk) 09:34, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I double checked that myself, and you are right. It is certainly a typo in Rameau's original print. I haven't checked the English translation to see whether it was corrected there or not. This probably should be done, and I have access to the translated edition, but it is not within reach at the moment.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 17:18, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have checked and, indeed, Philip Gossett caught the error and corrected it (silently, as it happens). I have added a note explaining this.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 05:46, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative definitions Comment 

message: Rameau did define 128/125 as the small diesis in 1722, as stated above, but in 1726 (Nouveau systeme) he named this interval the great diesis, and 648/625 the least semitone, as he did in 1722 as well, and as did Mersenne before and Sauveur after. Alexander Ellis also called 128/125 the great diesis (c. 1885). I wonder who changed the terminology. The earliest use of the modern nomenclature that I have been able to find is in the Harvard Dictionary of Music (W Apel), 1944.129.100.58.76 (talk) 21:26, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  alternative definitions
Talk:Neutral second

message: Can this interval also be called a perfect second? It just seems logical to me. --Celtic Minstrel (talk • contribs) 03:20, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I'm not an expert but I would say no.  The term "perfect" is more a convention than anything else.  I have heard some people say that it refers to the fact that the intervals perfect fifth and perfect fourth are very consonant, but I think it also is an artifact of the way those intervals are very close to the just intonation intervals, in 12-tone equal temperament, whereas thirds are out-of-tune from the just intervals.  The neutral second if played in a chord is a fairly dissonant interval, so that explanation is out...and the neutral second doesn't even fit into 12-tone equal temperament, although 11:10 is very in-tune in certain weird ones, like 22 equal temperament, and 12:11 is very in-tune if you use quarter tones.  Cazort (talk) 00:14, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

text: AIUI the "perfect" intervals are the ones that are the same in both the major and minor diatonic scales, which is only true of the 3-limit (odd maximum) harmonies (ones with ratios of 3:2n or 2n:1, where n is a non-negative integer). This appears in neither scale, so it can't be called "perfect". — Gwalla | Talk 18:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Also, closeness to just intervals is not a reason to call a tempered interval "perfect". In meantone, perfect fifths are actually less pure than major thirds, but they're still called "perfect fifths". In well temperaments, the purity of approximations varies considerably even within a single tuning. The diatonic naming convention for intervals predates the common use of 12-tone equal temperament by a long period of time. — Gwalla | Talk 16:49, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Perfect?

message: I added two audio examples to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 20:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry! The sound example for 12/11 is wrong (seems to be (9/8)/(10/9) == 81/80), regards --Wolf Peuker (talk) 23:18, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be wrong, but its clearly not . Hyacinth (talk) 10:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's definitely wrong. I don't know exactly where it is, but it should sound very similar to the other two, while this sounds closer to a quarter tone. I'm looking into ways to fix this. — trlkly 12:10, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio
Talk:Pythagorean interval

message: I added some audio examples to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 07:39, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio

message: The List of musical intervals lists two intervals, the ditonus and semiditonus, in addition to the ditone. All three intervals link to this article, but only the last of the three is mentioned here. Could someone please clear up the confusion? Thanks! SharkD (talk) 02:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ditonus

message: There is a major third playing instead of perfect fourth, so overall the same sample is played twice. I wish to thank the person who took the effort to do this, but it should be replaced. Cheers!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.210.246.182 (talk) 21:36, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The "Just perfect fourth on C" file is incorrect (398 cents instead of 498) so I edited the box to refer to "Perfect fourth on C" instead, which is 500 cents instead of 498. --Glenn L (talk) 22:52, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

text: In the meantime, would using "17 steps in 41-et on C" (497.56 cents) instead of "Perfect fourth on C" (500 cents) be a better substitution? If it's that important, I can change the link until "Just perfect fourth on C" has been fixed. --Glenn L (talk) 23:27, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

text: The "Just perfect fourth on C" file has just been replaced and now plays corretly. Thanks again for bringing the error to my attention! --Glenn L (talk) 05:05, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in sound examples 

message: Why and how may the introduction of this article need to be rewritten? Hyacinth (talk) 07:47, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction

message: Please note, that diatessaron, diapente, and diapason are simply the Greek terms for quarta (fourth), quinta (fifth), and octava (octave), but they do not imply a certain tuning system, because within the Ancient Greek tone system the proportions are always 4:3, 3:2, and 2:1, which says nothing about the diatonic, chromatic, or enharmonic intervals used for the division of the tetrachord. Platonykiss (talk) 22:40, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading alias for [[diapason (interval)]] 

message: Perhaps this article should be titled as a list, given that it consists of entirely of lists with an intro? Hyacinth (talk) 01:49, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to a list
Talk:Septimal major third

message: I have added two audio examples to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 03:28, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio

message: The paragraph explaining a septimal major triad is confusing since the 7:6 septimal minor third is not one of the notes of the septimal major triad, but rather the interval between the third and the fifth of this triad ( 3:2 / 9:7 = 7:6 ), much like a minor third is present in a regular major triad as the interval between maj3 and p5. Furthermore, 14:18:21 is the correct ratio for a septimal major triad. 6:7:9 is a septimal minor triad, which, nonetheless, contains a 9:7 interval between its septimal minor third and perfect fifth. I am going to make some changes to this paragraph to reflect this.
http://billygard.home.comcast.net/~billygard/tuning/chords/#majortriad
The link above is a reference to a definition of a septimal major triad.  I am new at this wikipedia editing thing, so I will try to figure out how to include the reference.
Derekhmartin (talk) 19:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supermajor Triad or Septimal Major Triad
Talk:Fifteenth

message: I have added an audio example to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 20:46, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio

message: The whole last portion is just all kinds of wrong, and should simply be deleted. 16va is not simply considered to be incorrect by some--it *is* incorrect. Consult the New Grove DOM Online.
These are the types of articles that give this site a bad name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.183.235.172 (talk) 01:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Criticism without thanks or suggestions for improvement is exactly the kind of comment that gives Wikipedia talk pages a bad name. Hyacinth (talk) 06:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect info

message: If you're going to say 8va (as in "one octave"), as EVERYONE accepts, instead of "7va" (counting notes), then most musicians expect "16va" (as in "two octaves"), instead of "14va" (NOT "15va"), counting notes. 68.196.1.236 (talk) 07:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 16va
Talk:Diminished octave

message: As the article stands, a reader would come away from it with the assurance that the diminished octave is a diatonic interval. (Read, checking for occurrences of the word diatonic.) Is this a good idea? In at least one sense the interval is diatonic, but in other senses it is not (see Diatonic and chromatic). Perhaps this needs some work.
– Noetica♬♩ Talk 05:11, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diatonic interval? 

message: I added an audio example to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 01:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 11:24, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Augmented second

message: As the article stands, a reader would come away from it with the assurance that the augmented second is a diatonic interval. (Read, checking for occurrences of the word diatonic.) Is this a good idea? In a couple of senses the interval is diatonic, but in other senses it is not (see Diatonic and chromatic). Perhaps this needs some work.
– Noetica♬♩ Talk 04:56, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diatonic interval? 

message: I have added an audio example to the article. Hyacinth (talk) 08:49, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested audio
Talk:Sand Hill, Oakley, California

message: Is Sand Hill really an unincorporated area? According to both the TopoZone database  and  United States Geological Survey's Geographic Names database, Sand Hill is located around Main St (Highway 4) between Hill Ave and Bolton Rd, which is inside the city limits of Oakley. If this is the case, Sand Hill would not be really an unincorporated area, but a district or neighborhood within the incorporated place of Oakley. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:29, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unincorporated area?