lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brassinosteroid

message: What lineages of plants contain brassinosteroids?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tedtoal (talk • contribs) 16:59, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  what plants? 

message: please, somebody help me, i need some info about the brassinosteroid receptors!! i only know that the plant steroid receptors are not nuclear... help help.
yes, i know google, but it would be so wonderful to find something accurate here...thanks. Myrmeleon formicarius (talk) 23:45, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  brassinosteroid receptors SOS 

message: It didn't take that much time to remember stuff from what i have learnt some time ago when seeing this
(eh, the first article given by StGoogle) 
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000449
However, the article about brassinosteroid receptors would still be very wellcome, and I guess not only by me :)Myrmeleon formicarius (talk) 23:49, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  good news 

message: Could someone add a picture as to how 24-Epibrassinolide  looks like? 2A02:8388:1641:4700:BE5F:F4FF:FECD:7CB2 (talk) 19:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure of 24-Epibrassinolide 

message: Someone (this edit in 2009) confused the authors for Grove et al 1979 and Mitchell et al 1970. I hope I have fixed this correctly. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grove/Mitchell problem
Talk:Monarch High School (Florida)

message: Sadly, there is no saving this article since the whole article is copyvio from:
* here
* and here
TerriersFan 02:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy delete

message: A replacement non-copyvio page can be found at Talk:Monarch High School (Florida)/Temp --Eastmain 07:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Replacement non-copyvio page

message: There is another building made for the school to add room for more students.
If you guys wish to add this then do so, just adding some information. I don't have a proper reference so I didn't add it to the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.34.130.109 (talk) 01:50, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEW INFO 

message: There appears to be some disagreement about whether there was a riot at this school a few days ago. This is the place for discussion, not in the article. The discussion so far:
"On April 25, 2008 during a pep rally in the school's gymnasium, numerous students were involved in a riot which required heavy police response. Many students were arrested, many suspended and at least one was expelled for their conduct.
The previous statement is factually inaccurate. No violence occurred at Monarch High School on April 25, 2008, no student arrests resulted from the pep rally, and no expulsions occurred. An edit of this statement was attempted, however a volunteer wikipedia editor did not allow any correction to be made. It is a shame that wikipedia purports to be a resource for information but has low standards for factual accuracy." 
Beeblbrox (talk) 03:29, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: After a quick Google on the subject, I didn't come up with any sources as required by Wikipedia policy for reliable sources. That is what is needed if this information is to be included in this article as it clearly controversial. Beeblbrox (talk) 03:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

text: It just got added and removed again sigh... Beeblbrox (talk) 04:12, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riot 
Talk:Chlorosome

message: I´ve done an image based on Bryant and Frigaard (2004) and Bryant et al. (2006).Bryant, D.A., and Frigaard, N. Seeing green bacteria in a new light: genomics-enabled studies of the photosynthetic apparatus in green sulfur bacteria and filamentous anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria Arch Microbiol 182, pp. 265–276 (2004)Bryant, D.A. et al. Molecular Contacts for Chlorosome Envelope Proteins Revealed by Cross-Linking
Studies with Chlorosomes from Chlorobium tepidum. Biochemistry 45, pp. 9095-9103 (2006) Unfortunately, I was not able to include the lamellar model into the picture as I´m not common with drawing programs and so had to use the rather poorly equipped Windows Word ... Anyway, the discussion whether bacteriochlorophyll is organized in rods or lamelles has not been ended yet. Both Bryant and Frigaard show Chlorosome models including the rod hypothesis on their current research pages:
Bryant: []
Frigaard: []
As both scientists are working on the subject, I think the rod hypothesis (de Groot et al. 2001) should be mentioned in this article.de Groot et al. A Refined Model of the Chlorosomal Antennae of the Green Bacterium  Chlorobium tepidum from Proton Chemical Shift Constraints Obtained with High-Field 2-D and 3-D MAS NMR Dipolar Correlation Spectroscopy Biochemistry 40, pp. 1587-1595 (2001)
The figure below shows the image I´ve done:
830px
If anyone would like to alter something, feel free to contact me and I will send you my files.
Elatrin (talk) 12:57, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rod model
Talk:Transketolase

message: The mechanism diagram needs editing in that the R groups on TPP cannot mention TPP, as these are denoted as substituents. So, use the squiggly line as are used in the sugar substituents.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pgpotvin (talk • contribs) 04:25, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram needs a bit of work
Talk:Auto insurance risk selection

message: The original version of this article was excerpted from .--Nowa 03:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original source of article

message: Looks like some significant edits were made before I got back here.  It's much more of a NPOV now, so I'm going to remove the tag I put on it. Mountainhawk 00:38, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The issue of whether or not this article should be deleted since its original content was taken from a pending US patent application is under discussion at: User_talk:Nowa#Re:_Auto_insurance_risk_selection--Nowa 23:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: This article needs to be cleaned up to remove the obvious US-centric bias which it suffers from.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.12.64.95 (talk) 20:00, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias
Talk:Soft energy path

message: I think one of the things that is not yet coming through clearly in the article is that soft energy paths are not just about energy production, but also about energy conservation and using energy more efficiently.  So SEPs transcend the traditional supply-side approach and emphasise an end-user perspective. Johnfos 03:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarity

message: :this article has a clear soft energy bias. It also lacks citations and the many arguments for hard energy. --76.103.156.222 (talk) 20:13, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Which arguments are you referring to and what citations do you have? Johnfos (talk) 20:29, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Johnfos (talk) 03:09, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias
Talk:The Railway Children (1970 film)

message: Can anyone provide any production information on the scene in which Bobbie is surprised by family and friends on her birthday?  It's a single over the shoulder shot as she receives gifts from them and as she approaches and moves between them she seems to glide rather than take real steps.  When someone walks normally their shoulders go up and down but hers don't.  My best guess is she was on the dolly in front of the camera - is that right?  Also, why?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oliver9184 (talk • contribs) 13:28, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Floating Bobbie 

message: Excellent article on a much loved filmAtlantic306 (talk) 14:53, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Great Article
Talk:Military counterintelligence of the Soviet Army

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: There is no evidence that Smersh is the best known.Harrypotter (talk) 00:39, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Best Known?

message: This article seems to be a translation from some other language, or perhaps it waswritten by editors who do not have English as their first language. In any case, it is unreadable. I hope some subject matter expert can help this poor thing. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 08:50, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreadable
Talk:Filippino Lippi

message: I'm still relatively new at all this, but it seems to me that this article is completely lacking in references. I would tag it, but am still uncomfortable with taking such liberties. There also seems to me some NPOV violations, given a lack of critical reference in such sentences as this, "His first works greatly resemble those of Botticelli's, but with less sensitivity and subtlety" and "Eventually Lippi's style evolved into a more personal and effective one...." I hope a more experienced editor might have time to take a look and decide if those issues need tagging. -- User:Moonriddengirl 14:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tagged the article for these issues. --Lendorien 20:39, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Based on what, dude? None of the best sources give a month< & many are uncertain about the year. Johnbod (talk) 03:15, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Vanabin

message: I removed "ten percent of the blood cell pigment of the sea cucumber is vanadium. [cite web | last = Natkin | first = Michael | title = Blood Color | work = Science Facts | publisher = Soak (Source Of All Knowledge) | date = 2007 | url = http://www.soak.com/topic/sciencefacts/article/tshow/98556/blood+color | accessdate = 2007-11-16 ]" as the source no longer exists and the fact is not confirmed in academic literature. Furthermore, evidence exists strongly indicating the contrary: sea cucumbers do not concentrate vanadium, I cited sources in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scientific29 (talk • contribs) 17:37, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have seen this "fact" circulate widely on the internet, and I think it's well worth explaining in this article that it is not true after all. Many non-scientific sources make the same clame about beetles, and I can't find any verification for this either. 2601:441:5000:13E0:4950:4EC4:9683:602C (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have a strong feeling, that the word "mineral" was here used mistakenly for "mineral substances"... The dissolved Au, Pt, Ag, Mn, V, etc. are not MINERALS but MINERAL SUBSTANCES... A mineral is always CRYSTALLINE (and, as such, not bioavailable). Eudialytos (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: "The world oceans carry diluted concentrations of rare minerals. Total amount of gold, silver, manganese and platinum" - not really...
Talk:Korean pear

message: I have no dogs in this ridiculous fight. I'm Welsh-Irish, not East Asian. I just happened to be eating a Pyrus pyrifolia and came by to read more about one of the world's most sublime fruits. I'd read the article before it was moved, so imagine my surprise when Nashi pear was suddenly a double-redirect leading to a hastily slapped-together article where a few instances of "nashi" had been changed to "Korean pear". This is ridiculous. If you don't like the title of an article, go talk about it on the article's page, don't just move it. And don't just move it so incredibly badly. I almost never edit, but I wasn't going to let this affront to a delicious foodstuff go unanswered. 69.140.12.199 03:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What??? 

message: Pretty obvious that Nashi pear is not the most common or important name for commercial Pyrus pyrifolia, which is what the articles are mainly about, so I took off the redirect and added some ancillary comments particular to Korean pear. The rest I added to Nashi pear. I'm not sure what the most common usage is, Asian or Korean pear. If someone could find some good numbers, we would know what the best name is. As for Nashi pear, if it is the main page, there is obviously a problem and the article should be moved. Jclf19k 22:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Korean pear]] or [[Asian pear]] versus [[Nashi pear]]
Talk:5-HT2A receptor

message: The history written here (ie about the M and D nomenclature) is general about all the 5-HT receptors and talks only of a very old accidental/spurious nomenclature which was used probably in the 1950's. We should better clean up that part and if that becomes big move it to the serotonin receptor general article with only a brief mention here. More importantly we need to put the specific parts of the 5-HT receptors history relevant to this receptor. eg in the 1994 nomenclature review, Hoyer first proposed that the erstwhile 5-HT2 now be called 5-HT2A, and the erstwhile 5-HT1C be renamed 5-HT2C sinec the 5-HT2C was found to be structurally much closer to the 5-HT2.
 Hoyer, D, Clarke, DE, Fozard, JR, Hartig, PR, Martin, GR, Mylecharane, EJ, Saxena, PR, Humphrey, PP
International Union of Pharmacology classification of receptors for 5- hydroxytryptamine (Serotonin)
Pharmacol Rev 1994 46: 157-203.
To quote the 1994 article:
"Until recently, there was no compelling evidence to subdivide 5-HT2 receptors which are widespread and mediate many of the actions of 5-HT throughout the body (Leysen et a!., 1983; Mylecharane, 1990). However,
the close structural homology of the 5-HT1C receptor with the 5-HT2 receptor, together with a shared second messenger transduction system and very similar operational characteristics, does clearly indicate that the 5-HT1C receptor should now be considered as a 5-HT2 subtype (Hoyer, 1988a; Hartig, 1989). With this in mind, we have recommended that it should now be called the 5-HT2C receptor (see section III). This makes it possible to call the “classical” 5-HT2 receptor 5-HTı and the
newly sequenced rat stomach fundus 5-HT receptor the 5-HT2B receptor (Foguet et a!., 1992a,b), instead of the term 5-HT2F (Kursar et al., 1992)."
We might have the older bif of the history as well. But since the people dealing with the spurious pharmacological coincidences were themselves baffled, we should clarify those facts in the light of later cloning data and clear the puzzle for them. -- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dr.saptarshi (talk • contribs) 23:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomenclature and History of 5-HT receptors

message: Why is Risperidone the only one mentioned? Don't almost all or all of the atypicals antagonise the 5HT2A receptor? Why not just say that the group of atypicals antagonises this receptor? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.216.191.182 (talk) 22:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atypical antupsychotics 

message: Excess 5-HT2A receptors can cause problems which is reduced by increasing TNF-a receptors with chili or by using 5-HT2A agonists.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.226.43.234 (talk) 00:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antidote 

message: Someone should investigate (google..) and write here about the positive effects of 5-HT2 agonists on long term memory. *snapshot* --Slowpoke21837240 (talk) 15:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  5-HT2 agonists and long term memory
Talk:Fas receptor

message: Hi! I'm relatively new in this and I don't know how to change the info box (the one with the picture and the basic information on the right). I'm a student of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology at URV, and I've been looking at the PDB's IDs given here, and the one named 3EWT is NOT a Fas receptor, but a Calmodulin-Calcium complex. If anyone can solve this little thing I'll be so glad ^_^
Anyway, if I find a moment to learn the wiki-editing stuff, I will change it myself...
--Elernaw (talk) 19:37, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  PDB IDs 

message: Here's the article, http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/10/111013121512.htm
And here is the citation-- Marion C. Bonnet, Daniela Preukschat, Patrick-Simon Welz, Geert van Loo, Maria A. Ermolaeva, Wilhelm Bloch, Ingo Haase, Manolis Pasparakis. The Adaptor Protein FADD Protects Epidermal Keratinocytes from Necroptosis In Vivo and Prevents Skin Inflammation. Immunity, 13 October 2011 DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.08.014
69.171.160.164 (talk) 16:53, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Today Linking Misregulation of This Protein to Skin Inflammation Disorders

message: Anything out there on how diet can impact this protein in the body? Any citations for supplements or herbs that may regulate it?
69.171.160.164 (talk) 16:53, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dietary Influences
Talk:Mount Lindesay Highway

message: The user who added these shields to the article should either provide a reference or revert. If they are to remain they should be added to the existing dab pages as redlinks to articles not yet written. Writing of these new articles (as stubs) should then be undertaken ASAP. Downsize43 (talk) 23:13, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: What was I thinking. Better to just unlink the text as is done with most other route numbers. Downsize43 (talk) 23:25, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Now done what was needed in the first place. Downsize43 (talk) 23:32, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  M13 and A13 shields 

message: Maybe extend the history and upgrades sections to include things like the Salisbury realignment. Jordf32123 (talk) 00:05, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More projects
Talk:Orphan receptor

message: Is the PCP site an adopted orphan, this paper seems to say so, but it's from 1987(?!) PMID: 2887250. Nagelfar (talk) 21:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2887250 An endogenous ligand of the brain sigma/PCP receptor antagonizes NMDA-induced neurotransmitter release.]
Talk:Phospholipase C

message: naber
Is there really a difference between Phospholipase C and Phosphoinositide phospholipase C? Mikael Häggström (talk) 20:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. They should be merged to eliminate the redundancy. Wisdom89 (talk) 20:25, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree they are the same, and I've merged much of the content of my article into this one.  I'm sorry that I didn't catch your article earlier!  A technical issue is that there are at least three other families of phospholipase C enzymes with different EC numbers.  I've made a disambiguation page to clarify that point.  Hoping that this is helpful, Willow (talk) 13:34, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: IP3/DAG pathway redirects to a non-existing section of this page. Would the IP3/DAG pathway section of the PIP2 page be more informative? Introt (talk) 09:44, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The "Signaling_pathway" section discusses the IP3/DAG pathway, so I pointed the redirect there Introt (talk) 16:19, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP3/DAG pathway redirect 

message: — Assignment last updated by Lulabees (talk) 17:00, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Developmental and Molecular Biology Spring 2024
Talk:Marthe Keller

message: Strictly speaking, her character in Black Sunday was not Arab, but Swiss or German.  She fought for the Palestinians, though.  Goblinshark17 (talk) 03:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Character was not "Arab"
Talk:Vesicular monoamine transporter

message: I am looking up the literature on chromaffine cells and sympathetic neurons with respect to development and differences therein. The review Cell Tissue Res (2015) 359:333–341
DOI 10.1007/s00441-014-1947-0 by K.Huber (Segregation of neuronal and neuroendocrine differentiation in the sympathoadrenal lineage) enforces the notion the Vmat1 is only expressed in chromaffine cells and not in neurons and cites Weihe et al. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience 5(3): 149-164/$7.20 Localization of Vesicular Monoamine Transporter Isoforms (VMATI and VMAT2) to Endocrine Cells and Neurons in Rat. This is in contrast to the sentence:
(Location:VMAT1:) It is also expressed in sympathetic neurons and blood platelets.
I do not know where this comes from since it is lacking a reference. Please change it or add a citation. --B.Kleine (talk) 08:49, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now got the paper by Brunk et al. It says just the opposite, VMat 2 is expressed in platelets. The paper cites a accessible reference for this: THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 278, No. 18, Issue of May 2, pp. 15850–15858, 2003; doi: 10.1074/jbc.M212816200. This is more consistent with latest review on chromaffin cells: Cell Tissue Res (2015) 359:333–341, DOI 10.1007/s00441-014-1947-0, which states that Vmat1 is restricted to chromaffin cells.--B.Kleine (talk) 03:45, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  VMAT1 in neurons?
Talk:Calsequestrin

message: The electrochemical potential of Ca2+ in the sarcoplasmic reticulum is less than the electrochemical potential of Ca2+ in the myofibril because of calsequestrin binding.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avkrules (talk • contribs) 04:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Electrochemical Potential
Talk:Brookfield Township, Trumbull County, Ohio

message: Brookfield, Ohio notes that it is a township in Trumbull County.  It has far more information than this article, but this article has the correct name.  Nyttend 03:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ballycastle, County Mayo

message: reference number three is to a different ballycastle--— ⦿⨦⨀Tumadoireacht Talk/Stalk 15:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Interferon gamma

message: I propose merging Interferon type II into Interferon gamma. IFN gamma is the only member of the Interferon type II class, so information for the category and its sole member can easily be merged. The existing Interferon gamma page is the more comprehensive of the two, in my judgment. MrMSDS (talk) 15:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely agree - IFN gamma being the only Type IIIFN, the terms are today synonymous. 173.54.127.110 (talk) 17:06, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Exactly how important is the brassica comment - it is not about interferon gamma and should be removed. Clearly an example of a scientist with a big ego trying to put their own work into wikipedia.
195.195.98.99 (talk) 17:30, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally, you should just be bold, but I agree and deleted that material. --Scray (talk) 03:03, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Therapeutic uses
Talk:Type II cytokine receptor

message: Hi, I'm going to be working on improving the article based on some more recent reviews. Here is my bibliography so far. Please let me know if you have any thoughts or feedback.
Fox, L. E., M. C. Locke, and D. J. Lenschow. 2020. Context Is Key: Delineating the Unique Functions of IFN alpha and IFN beta in Disease. Frontiers in Immunology 11:606874.
Krey, K., A. W. Babnis, and A. Pichlmair. 2020. System-Based Approaches to Delineate the Antiviral Innate Immune Landscape. Viruses 12:1196.
Stanifer, M. L., K. Pervolaraki, and S. Boulant. 2019. Differential Regulation of Type I and Type III Interferon Signaling. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20:1445.
Walter, M. R. 2020. The Role of Structure in the Biology of Interferon Signaling. Frontiers in Immunology 11:606489.
--Immcarle159 (talk) 20:06, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ipswich Road, Brisbane

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:51, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Liver X receptor

message: I think it will be nice if some one can add in figure showing the location and interaction of players in LXR signaling pathway or LXR protein structure. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.135.148.46 (talk) 18:33, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figures 

message: Would it be more informative to give the names LXRα and LXRβ in the two infoboxes, instead of "nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group H, member 3" and "nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group H, member 2"? --Zippy 18:39, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names shown in the two protein infoboxes 