lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nobility and royalty of the Kingdom of Hungary

message: The content of this article is quite strange...For example, Emperor / King / Prince are no noble titles, actually... Juro 00:58, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. Until someone writes a page on Hungarian royalty, I move those sentences here. Alensha 21:38, 7 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: It was extremely BAD idea to hide information! Mikkalai 06:01, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: titles

message: *Fejedelem was the title of the ruler of the Hungarian principality before the first king, Stephen I was crowned in 1000
- pls provide reference to a source containing the title of fejedelem before 1000 -- Criztu 21:02, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: i can give you an example with the following romanian title "domnitor" : everybody in Romania "knows" that Stefan the Great was a "domnitor" of Moldova, yet he is called "hospodar" in the documents of his time; however, the title "domnitor" aplies safely for romanian rulers from the 18th century. so calling the voivodes/governors/princeps/bans/herzogs of Transylvania as "fejedelem" or as "domnitor" i'm not satisfied with that :) -- Criztu 18:41, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the situation is similar here. "Fejedelem" safely applies to Hungarian rulers of Transylvania (from 16th century) but from the earliest centuries we don't really have any Hungarian-language sources. It would help to know how old the word itself is, but I don't have an etymology dictionary here right now... Alensha 12:35, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: The title is "great prince" in Slavic languages, so that I am quite sure that the title was "great prince" in Latin originally, which (at least) later was denoted as fejedelem in Hungarian so that the Hungarians apply it "in retrospective" also to the period of the 10th century. Unless someone finds the ethymology for the word, the correct solution would be to call the title "great prince" and not fejedelem. But this is only a sort of "educated guess". Juro 15:20, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: I'm waiting for User:Adam78 to find this talk page; he surely has an etymology dictionary. Alensha 15:43, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  fejedelem 

message: These families appear in Wikipedia in Croatian though they were not Croatian families. The Lackfis came from Transylvania (as Wikipedia states too) the Garay was a branch of the Dorozsma clan. 84.2.210.61 09:49, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lackovic and Gorjanski or Lackfi and Garay
Talk:Flipper

message: In pornography movies, there is an assistant job called "flipper" whose task it is to take care that the actors and actresses stay "performant" in between scenes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.117.69.42 (talk) 13:24, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Film Industry

message: ISTR that the name of the dolphin who played Flipper was "Mitzie" (per an actor interview). knoodelhed 01:24, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Dolphin, 1964 tv show

message: Here we celebrate Flipper Day on every 27th January. it was started celebrating from 27 January 2020 in all over the world but still it is not recognised outside india.
Concern -
The Flipper day is celebrate on the Birthday of [Shehnaaz Kaur Gill].
How shehnaaz Got this Tag - 
This was the contestant in a color TV show Bigg Boss season 13. Here she comes with a controversy outside with a famous punjabi Model Himanshi Khurana. but when Himanshi enter in the  Bigg Boss house as wild card and in the starting they show a space between but in the end when himanshi evited from BiggBoss they we very good friend. Now Himanshi also supporting shehnaaz kaur outside, with this table turning not expected situation makes shehnaaz rock.
While the show shehnaaz kaur get close to the sidharth shukla they show a very good bond in the BB13 and it gone famous as SIDNAAZ. Most of people and Bigg Boss fans curious to see their fascination. their bond goes nice on the episode with there FUN, but during the task many time shehnaaz turn the table and throw cold water on their expectations. thats why whole house including twitter give her a name flipper.
Sidnaaz still heartthrobe of bigg boss fans.
Edit by Govind Kumar  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gk1994 (talk • contribs) 07:55, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flipper Day (27 January)
File talk:CricketSCG1.jpg

message: The image description says Copyright David Morgan-Mar but is tagged with GNU FDL. What should be done about it? vedant (talk • contribs) 21:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am David Morgan-Mar. I uploaded the image myself. It's my understanding that I can retain copyright in the image and license it for use by Wikipedia under the GNU FDL. (If that's not true, I'll gladly change it.) Either way, it's not a copyvio, since it's my image and I'm explicitly allowing WP to use it. -dmmaus 22:23, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ says that The text and images of Wikipedia are covered by the GNU Free Documentation License. Unless an item is covered by the same or a similar license, or is in the public domain, it cannot be used on Wikipedia. So you have to ask the copyright holder of the material to license it under GFDL.. You cannot explicitly allow Wikipedia to use it. See more on this here: http://mail.wikipedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/2005-May/023760.html vedant (talk • contribs) 13:12, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:USS Okinawa (LPH-3)

message: Under the Okinawa's status it states "Expended as a target" can someone please explain what this terminology means? Misterrick 20:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What it means is that it was used in a live firing exercise as a target and sunked. ViriiK 07:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:Abu Muslim

message: I think this article should be moved to Abu Muslim Khorasani. That his most common name used in literature. Please let me know if you agree or disagree. --Behnam 07:57, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree. I think Abu Muslim Khorasani is more common name.Ariana310 20:24, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggesting new name for this article 

message: The article uses both terms. I assume they are the same, just using different transliterations. If nobody corrects me, I'm going to change everything to the Khorasan version in the near future. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 17:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, they are the same. --Pejman47 (talk) 18:42, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, fixed. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 21:28, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khurasan vs. Khorasan 

message: I found this while searching for information for another article. It would be great for this one as it primarily focuses on who Abu Muslim was. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:09, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious source 

message: Hello
On the crypto-Zoroastrianism section it mentions a quote from Nizam al-Mulk's book. However, in the book he doesn't actually attribute this to Abu Muslim, instead he says that this was by Sinbad (or Sunpadh):
"When the Rafidis heard mention of the Mahdi, and the Mazdakites the name of Mazdak, a great multitude of Rafidis and Khurrama-dins gathered at Rayy, and Sinbad's affair grew in magnitude until eventually 100,000 people joined him, mounted and on foot. Whenever he was alone with Zoroastrians, he would say, 'According to one of the books of the Sasanians which I have found, the Arab empire is finished. I shall not turn back until I have destroyed the Ka'ba, for this has been [wrongly] substituted for the sun; we shall make the sun our qibla as it was in olden time.' And to the Khurrama-dins he would say, 'Mazdak has become a Shi'ite and his command is that you make common cause with the Shi'a.' By saying the former things to the Zoroastrians and the latter to the extreme Shi'ites and Khurrama-dins, he kept all three groups happy"
I don't see any mention of Abu Muslim in this. Tykanes (talk) 10:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "crypto-Zoroastrianism" 

message: Hi, please explain your changes here, thanks. HistoryofIran (talk) 15:05, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unexplained changes 

message: Was Abu Muslim Al Khurasani Sunni or Shia 103.180.55.226 (talk) 06:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Abu Muslim Sunni or Shia
Talk:Unknown (magazine)

message: There's another, different Wikipedia article on the same magazine, which I created awhile ago: Unknown magazine.  I'm not sure but I think that was before it was possible to put parentheses in an article title.  I guess the thing to do now is to combine the articles.
Joel Schlosberg
Well, I combined them. It probably needs more work. I hope I kept the spirit of both articles, though of necessity some of the words had to go. Notinasnaid 09:41, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Early comments

message: I just checked for copyright renewals; Street & Smith renewed copyright on several of their magazines but not this one, so the covers are all public domain. Mike Christie (talk – library) 22:09, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: I've cut this:
:Campbell hoped to start publishing Unknown-style fantasy stories in Astounding in addition to science-fiction, and announced this in a December 1943 editorial; however, ASF reader reaction was so hostile that Campbell had to abandon this idea. Nevertheless, some unpublished Unknown stories did end up in ASF.The Unknown Unknown by Will Murray.
because the cited fanzine is not a reliable source.  It's a pity, as I think the information is interesting and probably accurate; I'll readd it if I can find another source for the data. Mike Christie (talk – library) 13:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fanzine source 

message: A user changed the spelling of canceled to cancelled.  This is an American mag so per WP:COFAQ#ENGLISH shouldn't it just have one "l"? ToeFungii (talk) 04:17, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You're mistaken, I was changing it to one L. —Jonny Nixon (talk) 04:21, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  You are correct and I apologize. I guess I got cross eyed because you are 100% correct. TY for the correction and the fix of my mistake. ToeFungii (talk) 04:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries at all. Have a good day. —Jonny Nixon (talk) 04:28, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is american mag right?, so shouldn't it be canceled not cancelled? 

message: Why are was there pictures of penises and naked Lady Gaga?!--Lerdthenerd wiki defender 13:56, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Vandalism.  It's been removed. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 14:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um....
Talk:Analytic signal

message: The process of eliminating negative frequencies from a signal is more general, and also applies to complex valued signals. I believe the article could be more general, since currently it explicitly says the pre-analytic signal should be real. -Roger (talk) 19:12, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What source are you relying on for such a generalized usage?  Everything I find (like this) suggests that "the analytic signal" comes from a real signal.  You're right that the process of removing negative frequencies is more general, and if you do that, what you're left with is the analytical signal of its real part, but that's already implied, and nobody does that, right?  Dicklyon (talk) 06:28, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've only come across one reference(2.3). If you look at the Harley receiver, it seems to be doing just this: computing the "analytic signal" (and frequency shifting) to remove negative frequencies, then taking the real part. This only agrees with part of the definition given in this article though, since the process isn't reversible when the input is complex. -Roger (talk) 16:26, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting.  It says "A signal with positive-frequency components only is called an Analytic Signal."  But that seems to me to be an idiosyncratic definition (that is, one unique to that author).  He admits that "Most texts only consider the special case of real input signals," (in reference to the filter, not the definition) and doesn't provide any examples of sources that use his interpretation.  So probably it's not a good idea to propagate that novel interpretation here.  If you want to describe the Hartley reciever in an article like single sideband, that would be good. Dicklyon (talk) 13:30, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

text: If you want to remove negative frequencies from complex-valued functions, then this transform will not be reversible (injective), so it will lose its main property. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:55, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  True, but regardless I think the complex input case is worth a mention. -Roger (talk) 16:31, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article limited to real valued signals? 

message: A small number of messy posts prior to 2009.  
* Talk:Analytic signal/Archive 1 — MaxEnt 09:28, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Archive created
Talk:Kinlochbervie High School

message: from VfD:
Part of a vanity campaign.  See Ricball, Richard Mackay, and Gillian Belbin. -- Kbh3rd 03:53, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ian Fraser (politician)

message: I've placed a mergeto tag, as this article has been sitting here as a unreferenced WP:BLP since late 2008 with Ian Fraser's notability questioned. Given the push to address unreferenced BLPs, a merge appears to be a good way forward. Schwede66 08:39, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mergeto tag 

message: The following tags have been on this article since October 2008:  and 
A   was added in February 2010.
On 13 May 2010, Adabow changed the stub to a redirect, with the following edit summary: "Unsourced, uninformative stub. Notability is also questioned."
On 14 May 2010, PatGallacher reverts the last action, with the following edit summary: "rv - I am not sure reducing to a redirect is the best way of dealing with problematic articles, soimetimes they should either be deleted or retained"
Ok, two options are presented: retain or delete. As for retaining, the article has been tagged since October 2008 and nobody has done anything about the concerns that the tags raise. That would leave us with the option of deleting. Ok, let's delete the article. Once that is done, what happens if somebody types "Ian Fraser (politician)" into WP? Not an unlikely thing to do. And given that he is mentioned on Libertarianz, why wouldn't we refer the reader to that article? What we should do is to set up a redirect! Let's see what WP:REDIR tells us about the purpose of a redirect. Here's the relevant one: 
Sub-topics or other topics which are described or listed within a wider article. (Such redirects are often targeted to a particular section of the article.)
From the above, I conclude that we should:
# delete the page, and then
# set up a redirect for Ian Fraser that points to the section of the Libertarianz article where he is mentioned.
That's what I shall do. But I leave out the step of deletion and go straight to step 2, as the outcome is the same, and it's a lot easier to do. Schwede66 00:55, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion of creating a redirect
Talk:Water fluoridation

message: The third sentence in the opening section states "Fluoridated water operates on tooth surfaces: in the mouth, it creates low levels of fluoride in saliva,". Shouldn't this be "high levels"? How does exposing your mouth/body to fluoride lower saliva levels? 118.92.202.147 (talk) 08:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "Low" is what's supported by the refs. I would assume it's low as opposed to very very low or even none if water does not supply fluoride. DMacks (talk) 09:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

text: It's trying to point out that the levels of fluoride in saliva will be very small, although higher than would otherwise occur. For example, the article includes "recommended fluoride levels in the United States were changed to 0.7 ppm" and if that is the current rate in most tap water, the levels in saliva would be significantly lower, making it way under a part per million which is a low level. Johnuniq (talk) 09:36, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low levels or high? 

message: "Typically a fluoridated compound is added to drinking water, a process that in the U.S. costs an average of about $1.26 per person-year." I couldnt find such figure in either of the two sources given. --Nomad (talk) 04:34, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Costs 

message: There is a simple grammatical error in the following sentence:
"Although fluoridation can cause dental fluorosis, which can alter the appearance of developing teeth or enamel fluorosis;[3] the differences are mild and usually not an aesthetic or public health concern."
In the sentence above, the semi-colon after "fluorosis" should be replaced with a comma. 2600:1700:110:DB0:C19C:115E:42DB:B03D (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Jamedeus (talk) 16:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 April 2024
Talk:Robert William Wilcox

message: The photo caption says he was found innocent each time, whereas the article states in the last instance he was sentenced to death. Rogermexico 16:45, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The caption is a bit misleading. —Viriditas | Talk 01:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Indeed, doubly so. History is a bit more nuanced. Hs first revolution was also against the Monarch in power at the time. How about it now? Article still needs a biobox, and more citations. Better picture if possible. W Nowicki (talk) 19:12, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory caption 

message: I believe it is notable enough to go past Umi to Kalanikaumakaowakea in text. Probably a more notable mention as umi never ruled but his father seems to have been Moi of Maui according to Fornander. Do I have that correct? .--Mark Miller (talk) 19:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If so the same applies for Lonomakaihonua who was a non-ruling son of Lonohonuakini.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 20:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Lets leave the current text as is and add another sentence to expand on the lineage using Fornander or another such source.--Mark Miller (talk) 22:02, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umi-a-Liloa of Maui line
Talk:Josie and the Pussycats (1970s band)

message: Sources: (1) http://lpintop.tripod.com/oldiesconnection/id17.html (reprinted from an article in Cool & Strange Music Issue #28, March 2003); and http://www.geocities.com/antlion7/josie.htm (reprinted from the liner notes for the Rhino Handmade collectors' CD. --b. Touch 04:44, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: I have two references that state the follow-up recordings, for Josie and the Pussycats in Outer Space, were sung by the same three girls who did the first series.  This article states that those second-series recordings were done by anonymous session musicians.  Is there any way to track down the names of these second-series vocalists to support the claim in the article?  I seem to remember reading an article about Cheryl Ladd stating that she was, indeed, only involved in the first series' sessions, but we could use some clarification.  By anonymous, is it meant that the series didn't even credit them?  Anybody with a copy of that on DVD?  (C'mon, don't be shy!  Tell us you checked it out from your local library!)  Abrazame (talk) 07:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymity in ''...Outer Space'' 

message: The list of recordings appears to be missing the theme song, which Holloway, at least, recorded. Was it never commercially released? If that's the case it should be listed among the "TV only" songs. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 22:26, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Theme Song

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Weak consensus to move to Josie and the Pussycats (1970s band).  No such user (talk) 12:45, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Josie and the Pussycats (album) →  – This article currently covers not only the self-titled album, but the band's entire history 162 etc. (talk) 00:08, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:11, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Or maybe Josie and the Pussycats (1970s band).  I think this would clearly imply a real-life band, and simultaneously remove any possible confusion with the musicians who recorded 2001's Music from the Motion Picture Josie and the Pussycats. 162 etc. (talk) 15:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 May 2021 

message: *Now that this is no longer an album article, how do we de-italicize the title? 162 etc. (talk) 15:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-move comment
Talk:Josie and the Pussycats

message: I have added info on the  cartoon,  comic, and  singing group; creating individual pages for each one and turning this into a disambig page. --b. Touch 04:47, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would that need to be mentioned here? I hardly think anyone would come to this page looking just for "Josie". 124.186.246.195 (talk) 05:01, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Vasilis Leventis

message: 'If you have any proof that there is no war by the media barons against mr. Vassilis Leventis I would be happy to listen to it. But. You were not in 1993 in Channel 40 headquarters neither in Malgara accident. So, please, because a lot of people were in both incidents. Also, I think is very easy for you to say that is ridiculus the "typewriter" information but whatever you may say, it is a lie. Because Vasslis Leventis was at the struggle against the bloody Junta and used his typewriter. For all of these there are proofs and if you want you can go to Enosi Kentroon, Karolou 28 - Athens/Greece, to see them for your self.'
: so, how did he use it? as ammunition? did he club the dictator Papadopoulos on the head with it?  Ok, your english sucks. I have said all i have to say in your talk page as well as in Etz's talk page. I vote that the article stands as is right now.
: Project2501a 15:00, 16 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quantis == (bad english) Troll 

message: There's an edit dispute on Vassilis Leventis (not kidding) between User:Quantis and me, which has led into two versions of the article, one his and one mine. Please review them and comment on it. Thank you. Etz Haim 17:38, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vassilis Leventis:Quantis reply 

message: I am sorry about "Vassilis Leventis" article. Yes, the article was not NPOV. Please also accept my apologies for trolling behaviour. I also restored my talk page as it is appropriate. quantis 12:20, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apologies 

message: Since there is the proof of the political extermination of Vassilis Leventis from Panos Panagiotopoulos I strongly dissaggree with the phrase: "However such allegations have not been confirmed." and therefore I suggest to full delete it. I express my dissagreement with striking a line on the phrase. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.16.183.11 (talk) 10:54, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The phrase: "However such allegations have not been confirmed." 

message: The whole interview paragraph was ridiculous, as if it were the highlight of his political career. Its title was also extremely POV. Guys like Leventis live off conspiracy theories and actually suffer under severe persecution mania. WP standards require though a bit more than a moving description of a bad journalist making bad jokes as proof that established media and politicians are trying to destroy Leventis.--Archidamus 15:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it again. It was almost as long as the rest of the article. Was it that important for Mr. Leventis, that he once appeared in a mainstream tv show?--Archidamus 17:02, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interview