Talk:Intimidation

message: Historically, intimidation is notable as an aspect of fighting methods and military strategies.  This lens needs more article space.  Tlogmer Talk / Contributions 06:38, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I understand that intimidation sometimes makes a person have a certain degree of fear that they will be harmed in some way, but that is not the only situation in which intimidation occurs.  For example, you may be intimidated by someone who is very talented/much more talented than yourself.  The only thing being hurt in that case is pride.  And someone may not intentionally be intimidating, but may just be an intimidating person because they have an extreme amount of fame, beauty, power, money, popularity, talent, etc.  Another example is a man being too intimidated by a woman's beauty to approach her and ask her out on a date.  
See what I mean?  Intimidation isn't just used in, say, football games or fights; people can be unintentionally intimidating, and intimidation doesn't have to invoke fear of injury or harm.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.169.207.111 (talk) 05:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Injury or harm?

message: Three party intimidation is an economic tort in England and Wales. The two party case is not well understood. There is an offence called "intimidation or annoyance by violence or otherwise" under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, s.241, which can specifically be committed by "intimidation". James500 (talk) 05:07, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tort and offence 

message: The introduction paragraph excludes meanings of intimidate outside of the legal sphere, and thus only introduces one section of the article.  Erudecorp ? * 00:44, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction paragraph applies only to the last section “As a criminal offense” 

message: There was a stub without any cited sources at criminal threatening, and the content seemed about the same, so I made it a redirect to Intimidation. The original article is at Talk:Intimidation/Criminal threatening. I wasn't able to find any tidbits that weren't already covered better here, but I thought I'd hold out so people could review. --ESP (talk) 17:01, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criminal threatening 

message: Really, that's all I wanted to know about this subject, was the state of Montana's stance. Is that germaine, or really the most applicable legal view? 184.7.170.184 (talk) 00:01, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Montana?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Intimidation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070103150900/http://www.together.gov.uk/category.asp?c=283 to http://www.together.gov.uk/category.asp?c=283
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:43, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Animals use intimidation as well as humans, so I don’t know why they aren’t included on this article. Pogeons (talk) 03:42, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use by animals?