lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Strcmp

message: i have program but want it to write in c only can i get help the program is 
write a program to print only ovels ie(a,e,i,o,u) of a string and take the string from the keyboard
:Talk pages are for discussing the article, not for asking for help on a subject. I recommend you look around for a programming forum to ask this question on.
:I can also tell you that strcmp won't do what you want. I'm not an expert on the subject, so I don't know if there are any more efficient methods (there probably are), but try iterating over the string and using the == operator to compare the character at the current position to the vowel characters. Another way would be to use a regular expression library to either match the vowels, or to cull out non-vowel characters, but this may add licensing issues, and could well be less efficient than other methods. --Link (t•c•m) 07:44, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Because strcmp is a function in the UNIX standard library, which was later adopted by the C standard library. When Brian Kernighan wrote "The C Programming Language", strcmp was part of "The Unix Programming Environment".
It is still a function in the UNIX standard library, even though it has been adopted by the C standard library.
It is a function in the UNIX standard library, independently from whatever the C standard library is.
It is a function in the UNIX standard library even when the UNIX standard library is written in assembler.
The function in the UNIX standard library is not derived from the C standard library.
It is a function in the UNIX standard library before, after, and in parallel with being a function in the C standard library.
Since standardisation of the C Standard library, the function in the C standard library is now independent of the UNIX standard library.
Why POSIX? Because POSIX was a standard which was intended to be a description of standard UNIX. UNIX was a brand name, and I'm not sure it would be meaningful to say "strcmp is a function in an operating system based on UNIX"
Also, because it helps people to understand the old descriptions of C like "a small language with around 30 keywords" if they understand that those descriptions at that time assumed a standard library provided by the OS.
However, if you have a better way of writing that or explaining that, if you can think of something better to reference rather than POSIX, go ahead.150.101.166.15 (talk) 04:05, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  (Why would you mention POSIX? There are more standards that include strcmp, for example SVID 4, SUSv2, microsoft standards, others.)  

message: PHP, MySQL, etc. also have strcmp(). Why not mention those too? --71.141.136.10 (talk) 19:45, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  why only C?
Talk:Certified Internet Web Professional

message: This article seems to be teetering very close to an advertisement for a commercial CIW program. I struck about half the article because it was a direct copyright violation; the remainder should likely be gone over closely. —C.Fred (talk) 23:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a POV tag as I agree that this article is basically an ad for the company. --65.6.10.240 (talk) 14:03, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Having come across this CIW article (to find out what the heck a CIW is), I thought it so much an ad I looked for a link to click to report it as such. Not seeing such, I came to this talk page, to see my impression so mirrored. Which is to say ... my impression was strong enough to motivate me to look for ways to do something about it. (And got here.)
It may well be tagged POV, but I didn't notice any such. i.e. To all appearances, this is a 'genuine' and 'authoritative' wikip article. Perhaps something more blatant could be done to the article.
In particular:
- "to become the world's largest Web education certification program." - authoritative reference / basis for statement?
- "Universities, community colleges and secondary schools from North America to EMEA, Japan and China currently use CIW." - same. One example ([5]) does not a statement confirm.
= or ... the implication is that many find them useful / authoritative / of high quality, while no basis is given for the implication. (vs ... 'cause there's nothing else out there.) [Not saying that's true, I don't know, but no reason is given to believe otherwise.]
- "the most popular is Master CIW Designer" - basis for statment?
Having said this, I appreciate the article, -something-, being here. It does, for example, let me know to go over to CompTIA to vet further. Which is something, and better than nothing. The reference to CompTIA is in fact the only hint that somebody ('trusted') objectively finds CIW has any value at all. With the reference, I may go to CompTIA and check further. Without that (such a) reference I would have dismissed CIW entirely at this point.
BS (talk) 01:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agreed ... it's (mostly) an ad! 
Talk:Spaceway-2

message: SPACEWAY-2 should be merged with SPACEWAY-1, and quite possibly with SPACEWAY itself.
There is nothing sufficiently different between the first two spacecraft, and their SPACEWAY-specific parts of their missions were disabled by DirecTV.  The irony is that SPACEWAY-2 and SPACEWAY-1 are not going to be SPACEWAY birds.  The SPACEWAY-3 satellite is going to have true SPACEWAY mission. --KJRehberg 23:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPACEWAY-2 should be merged with SPACEWAY-1 
Talk:Historic Formula One Championship

message: Is there any point in redlinks to individual season pages? Frankly motorsport does not get much more amateur in focus than at Historic level and there are so many more important race series out there. Notability would be difficult to establish as well. Propose the season red links be removed. --Falcadore (talk) 03:39, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection here. DH85868993 (talk) 10:41, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to seasons 

message: The Regulations section is written in a very informal and unencyclopaedic tone, hence the reason for my adding the Template:Tone tag. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 18:02, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate tone
Talk:Historic motorsport

message: Should the "Brian Redman International Challenge" at Road America qualify on this list? Royalbroil 15:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added it in, I thought at first that this was the Rennsport Reunion which he also organise. Willirennen 22:11, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Historic races

message: Tagged incomplete because motorsport includes non-racing like drifting or trials, and includes non-cars like motorcycles. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 19:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand to include motorcycles and non-racing sport 

message: The article needs more detail on how vehicles are classified and what Historic racing classes exist in FIA and in different countries. Wolfmartyn (talk) 16:58, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic classes
Talk:Southern Festival of Speed

message: Yes it would seem reasonable to merge these 2 pages as the SFOS series is closely related to the circuit. But consider that the SFOS series has run for the last or 2 years without this circuit, and that the circuit could in theory be run separately from the SFOS series. Tartanperil (talk) 04:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Southern Festival of Speed and Dunedin Street Circuit merger?
Talk:Two-Mile Borris

message: Why is "Baronies of Ireland" redundant, but not "Lists of towns in Ireland"? Neither is referenced in the body of the article. Yet both shed light on a higher order, of which the subject of the article is a member. The link to Barony is to the term in general, not to Ireland in particular. I think that the "See also" link should be restored. Laurel Lodged (talk) 23:32, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Eastern Orthodox worship

message: I know the Russians are very elaborate in their bell ringing, but don't the Greeks ring bells too?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.234.161.10 (talk) 23:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just Russian Orthodox Church? 
Talk:Hat puzzle

message: Currently in the explanation section it says "two wear black hats and other two wear white" but then provides two visual examples that don't seem to line up with that (one is 3 W and 1 B, the other is as expected).  Likewise in the example below that with six prisoners it says three wear black hats and other three wear white but then shows three examples, one of which has 6 B's and only 1 W, and another with 4 B's and 1 W.
I don't claim to understand this puzzle at a mathematical level, but this seems to make no sense to me.  Looking back in the history it was not always this way, but has been for some time.  Can anyone explain why it is in its current form?  If not, I'll change it to something that seems to make sense.  Rotundo (talk) 14:58, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation
Talk:Monochamus

message: http://wiki.bugwood.org/Monochamus_sartor  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.244.173.87 (talk) 07:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: more
Talk:Ladd Carriage House

message: Delisted?  How and why was the building delisted from the National Register of Historic Places?  Tsarevna (talk) 01:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know details, but I heard it was delisted when it was moved from its original location, and the move "broke" the eligibility, even though it has been moved back. Tedder (talk) 00:59, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delisted? 

message: Any reason this should be a redlink? It seems like it would be better as a redir here. And P.S. thanks tedder for the great pics. Katr67 (talk) 20:27, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Friends of Ladd Carriage House]] 

message: *https://www.oregonlive.com/living/2021/03/portland-disappearing-architecture-the-fascinating-history-of-the-iconic-elk-statue-block-216-food-carts-ladds-mansion-and-the-abandoned-centennial-mills.html
---Another Believer (Talk) 20:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Rhineuridae

message: The article states that the Rhineuridae are listed as Least Concern "due to their wide distribution". However, earlier in the article, they are said to be "found only in Florida no further north than the panhandle". Surely a species that is found an area c.0.1% of the total surface area (land mass) of the Earth cannot be said to be widespread. For example - the African Elephant's distribution covers about a quarter of Africa (c.5.0%) but are not considered to be widespread.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kendroche (talk • contribs) 19:51, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Conservation Status
Talk:Eagle (Wildstorm)

message: Given the general naming conventions for comic characters and precedents amongst the Wildstorm ones it'd make sense for this to be called Eagle (Wildstorm). That said as the character only appears in Red Menace is worth merging him there. Or are there plans for further adventures? (Emperor 16:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like Red Menace is the place to merge. Lots42 (talk) 07:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Argento Surfer (talk) 21:49, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename or merge?
Talk:Mexican mole lizard

message: Just merged this page with Bipes biporus, which is now a redirect.  They were mostly the same.  The end. 68.83.10.206 (talk) 03:13, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

message: i removed ajolote from the intro sentence. its presence is contradicted by the third sentence in the intro.
initially i was worried i was going to have to resort to WP:OR,
*
*es:Ambystoma_mexicanum
and throw myself at the mercy of the court. 
if i was from mexico, i imagine that this might be WP:Common knowledge, especially as the axolotl's popularity has increased in recent years, and the school age kids learning about it in science class get older. 
it's hard finding information online in re the Bipes and ajolote confusion, as it looks like a lot of search results are people who've copied and pasted the incorrect wikipedia article.. and the rest are in spanish.
but then i found these 2 sources:
*scientific paper about the axolotl. ajolote mentioned on page 2
*i like it's some sort of literary criticism? from monmouth college, illinois
i think this works?≈Sensorsweep (talk) 02:29, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  ajolote 
Talk:Sella group

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Gruppo del Sella.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on October 25, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-10-25. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:05, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Gruppo del Sella.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Key Art Awards 2006

message: I am interested in having this article renamed to simply 'Key Art Awards' rather than a complete page for one single event. Another option would be to create an entirely separate page for Key Art Awards and merge it with this one. Either way, I am planning to clean up this article first. It is entirely confusing to anyone who does not know what the Awards event is for (no intro in article). ResurgamII 00:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page rename/merge
Talk:Keser

message: Hey Kevan, just "discovered" you after reading about aereogramme on allmusic (as your influenced by them, they are great) and listening to your tracks right now on myspace. awesome stuff guys. Have you ever heard of The Future Sound of London, i think you would like them. Anyway, ill help you out with your article dude as i mainly work on music related stuff on here. peace! ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 06:09, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awesome 
Talk:Kerwin Danley

message: Is there a notability guideline for umpires?  I'm not entirely sure this person needs an article at all; the fact that reliable sources mention him regarding the World Series game doesn't address WP:BLP1E. Umpires aren't like athletes, are they?  Or are they automatically notable just because they're major league umpires? --barneca (talk) 19:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So because an umpire isn't an athlete that makes him non-notable? I don't think so. The guidelines we have developed at WP:BASEBALL state that an umpire is notable if they "have served as a Major League Baseball umpire on a regular league staff." —Borgardetalk 12:13, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't get in a snit, it was an honest question.  I didn't know about the WP:BASEBALL guidelines, now I do. --barneca (talk) 15:12, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Guidelines are just that - guidelines. Not policies. And the one cited above appears to be a wikiproject guideline, so it likely hasn't received much attention from the greater community. If Danley doesn't meet the general notability guideline, he'd certainly be fair game for a deletion nomination, at which point someone could bring up the WP:BASEBALL guideline as a non-binding argument in favor of notability. Mr. Darcy talk 03:19, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Henry Doctor Jr.

message: The highest-ranking South Carolina State University military alumnus, Lt. Gen. Henry Doctor Jr., '54, has died. His interment will be held on Monday, Dec. 17, at Arlington National Cemetery.
A three-star general, Doctor achieved the highest rank of 13 General Officers who were commissioned via S.C. State's Bulldog Battalion.
Doctor was born on Aug. 23, 1932, in Oakley, S.C., to the late Henry Doctor and Annie Aikens Doctor and died on Dec. 10, 2007.
After graduation from Berkeley Training High School in Moncks Corner, S.C., Doctor attended S.C. State, and in 1954 received his bachelor's degree and was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army. He completed 35 years of service in the U.S. Army and served with distinction in leadership positions.
His last three assignments before retirement were:
* Chief of Staff, U.S. Army Material Development and Readiness Command, Alexandria, Va.
* Commanding General, 2nd Infantry Division, Eighth U.S. Army, Republic of Korea.
* Inspector General of the U.S. Army, The Pentagon, Washington, D.C.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bnguyen (talk • contribs) 16:02, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Cheletropic reaction

message: This (and many other!) chemistry articles could really benefit from adding a diagram, even a simple reaction diagram, to clarify the text. Any experts out there?
Asd28 00:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me that there are a lot of diagrams, they may have been added after the tag was added. Reqdiagram removed as it seems satisfied to me. Egmason (talk) 10:40, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram
Talk:Oldtimer Grand Prix

message: If I understand well the meaning is that this article is not really worth to be kept in the Wikipedia. If is might be the meaning...
... you should consider that this Oldtimer Grand Prix was one of the central events in these years in Europe. Only in England and on the Nürburgring had been similar events. 
... wikipedia should not occupy with "moderne" sports and trends but even with the history of sport - and I am the opinion that the Oldtimer Grand Prix is one of the really worth mentioning events!
I am aware of the circumstance that the younger generation are not so familiar with the period of the 1970ies. But I hope that the article will stay there and some other fellows will complete it with fotos and personal memories. Mosaico 09:28, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In my view, I had thought at one point that this article should had been rewritten as nowadays everybody associate this event with the Nürburgring event, also the Porsche website  states this event as the 32nd running, but looking at the google search indicates that the Salzburgring event do exist therefore this page should be used as a ambig and this article should be called Oldtimer Grand Prix (Salzburgring) and the be called Oldtimer Grand Prix (Nürburgring). Willirennen 01:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dorinish

message: What are the coordinates I would like to see on Google maps/satellite images etc Carlwev (talk) 15:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The North Island is located at 53.812486, -9.671495. I know this is old, but I hope you see it eventually! JasonAllen (talk) 00:05, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates please
Talk:Feast of Orthodoxy

message: I was wondering if "moving" the page (i.e., renaming it) to "Triumph of Orthodoxy" or, better yet, "Sunday of Orthodoxy" would be recommended? These are the only names I have ever heard it called by, and I've been Orthodox for 27 years now. This page, and the Catholic Encyclopedia article it was originally taken from, are the only placed I've ever seen it referred to as "Feast of Orthodoxy" I was wondering what other users thought. MishaPan 14:14, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yes.  The article states that is was called Sunday of Orthodoxy, and no reason is given for the name of the article being different.  --142.163.194.123 (talk) 13:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change

message: I have rearranged the images by inserting one depicting the Triumph of Orthodoxy at the head of the article, and dropping the icon from St Catherine's down. The icon of Nicea VII has been replaced, because it is less relevant to this article.Iacobus (talk) 03:08, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Template talk:Nature

message: I created this navigation box because that is what I do.  I am not a nature expert.  Please add/change/delete as appropriate.--Old Hoss 00:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New 

message: I don't know if this runs too away from the context, but I think that adding 2 more rowos inside "Life" topic, one for "phiscology and mind" and another for Social Interaction is trully good!
What you think?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ogat (talk • contribs) 06:15, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Row for Consciousness/Self/Identity and a Row for Social and interaction. 

message: The Nature portal was recently deleted. I've removed the red link from the template. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 08:17, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to deleted portal removed
Template talk:New York Mets

message: So it begins.  This template is already getting out of control with everyone thinking their favorite people deserve to be in the "Important" list.  I predict that list won't last.  —Wknight94 (talk) 00:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If this keeps up, I'm going to add Bobby Bonilla, Vince Coleman and Anthony Young. --Muboshgu (talk) 01:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Important?

message: Removing this error from the template - while the original business name of the club was originally "The New York Metropolitan Baseball Club Inc.", the team has never been the "New York Metropolitans".  They have always been simply the "Mets".  The team's website  is quite clear on this, as is the team's article.  SixFourThree (talk) 16:03, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Officially the New York Metropolitans"

message: The choice of  blue and  orange for the background and text in the navbox title is problematic.  The contrast ratio for these colors is , which is far below the 4.5 required for compliance. (Note that if you get a number less than 1, you need to switch the order of the colors when computing the ratio.) Using white as the text color, with the blue as background color is much better, with a ratio of .  Note that there is a similar problem with white on orange, which has a ratio of . Note that the Mets logo gets around this by inserting a white outline between the blue and the orange. The following table summarizes the situation:
Color 1	Color 2	Sample	Ratio
       	       	      	
       	       	      	
       	       	      	
       	       	      	
       	       	      	
Comments? Frietjes (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color contrast
Talk:Martha Lloyd

message: According to thePeerage.com, Charles Craven (1682-1754), who was Governor of South Carolina (1711-1717), married Elizabeth Staples and had one son, Rev. John Craven (1754-1804). Charles Craven does not appear to have had a daughter. This part of the article requires further investigation. Simmaren 01:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article starts "Martha Lloyd (1765-1843)" whereas the bio field says born 1772. Either one or both of them is wrong. --MagicMoose (talk) 13:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: Johnclevedon added the following comment to mainspace regarding the reference to a supposed daguerreotype of Martha Lloyd in old age, with her dog.
A note at the Jane Austen Museum in Chawton, Hampshire, UK, suggests that the above mentioned is in fact an "ambrotype" (a later technology), rather than an daguerreotype, and could not, therefore, be an image of Martha Lloyd.  It is suggested that the image is of another relative of Jane Austen.  (Refer to the printed note at the Jane Austen Museum, seen and read on Saturday 2nd April 2016.)  JF.
Comment moved here by Eric Pode lives (talk) 20:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daguerrotype 
Talk:The Teeth

message: I don't see any rationale for using an album cover in place of a band photo. --Leahtwosaints (talk) 14:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album cover as photo? 

message: Same story and the teeth 41.113.239.18 (talk) 18:10, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first time