Talk:ImagiNation Network

message: I remember the pricing was around 20 to 40 dollars for unlimited service the time AT&T was running the INN network. The surcharge that is mentioned in this section was mostly if you used a non-prefered numbered, which was the 1800 number. Any other number it was okay, and you were charged a flat fee/rate for unlimited access.  Therefore, that section is wrong. 
I remember I liked the dungeon game the best. It was first person and I could party up and explorer dungeons with other players. --71.103.86.249 (talk) 16:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pricing

message: The article is confusingly written, constantly referring to a manual which most people won't have access to. An effort should be made to revamp this article in its entirety, adding actual information, as opposed to simple lists of the games one could play. I've rewritten the opening section, added a sidebar, and started a 'history' section. Let's tidy up this article; if the quality is high enough, this page may be a canidate for a featured article in the future. --FarFromHomeFish 09:37, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuing clean-up of article 

message: The newsgroup for INN (located at alt.online-service.imagination (on Google)) is only spam these days. While it once might have had some interesting material on it, it now has nothing to add to any discussion save those about 'free cash' and 'bigger boobs'. Unless there's any dissent, I'll go ahead and remove the link on 06/30/06. --FarFromHomeFish 14:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove link to INN newsgroup? 

message: So there were parts of the network which were removed because of their content? Which parts would that be? It's not explained enough, I think.--164.77.106.168 19:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Risqué? 

message: :Image:FAUX INN champ.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:FAUX INN champ.gif

message: I feel like this redirecting to the 1990s Section of Sierra Entertainment's Wikipedia Article isn't right. INN was a vital part of Sierra On-Line's presence during the 1990s, and giving it a direction to something where only a small amount of information relates to the topic is a bit of an injustice. Christhecoolboy (talk) 05:29, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Redirection to Sierra Entertainment | 1990s