lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Frédérique Constant

message: After previous deletion, Kinslayer proposed to change his opinion. Believe notability of Frederique Constant as Watch Manufacturer was established and accepted. 
If still in doubt, please compare notability of Frederique Constant with many other, less known companies on list Watch Manufacturers.
Pcstas 06:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This draft was permitted by DRV, and moved from User talk:Pcstas.  A history merge is impractical as this is a user talk page.  Please refer to User talk:Pcstas for attribution purposes. Xoloz 14:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GFDL Note

message: Frederique Constant was founded in 1988, not 1904 as somebody changed in Wiki. Company founders are Aletta and Peter Stas. The name Frederique Constant is based on our great grand parents Frederique Schreiner and Constant Stas.
Pcstas 02:55, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Just flagging a possible WP:COI, however Special:Contributions/Pcstas all seem reasonable at first look, and above comment and change is certainly supported by sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:07, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company foundation 

message: Alpina Watches was added to Frederique Constant page with incorrect statement. 
Frédérique Constant owns Alpina Watches International SA
Alpina watches is an independent brand with long history and owned by Citizen Watch upon acquisition in 2016. 
Original Alpina page should be restored.
Pcstas 17:53, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that depends somewhat on what is meant by "Frederique Constant" whether this refers to the Frederique Constant SA or the "Frederique Constant Group". If I understand correctly from this announcement, and previous conversations, at the time of the sale to Citizen Watch, Frederique Constant Holding SA owned Union Horlogère Holding B.V., which owned the companies Frederique Constant SA, Alpina Watches International SA, and Ateliers deMonaco SA. The names (and ownership) seem so similar that "Frederique Constant" could refer either to the parent holding company or one of the watchmaking companies that it owns. That seems to be the source of confusion. Alpina Watches was owned by Frederique Constant Holding SA, but was not owned by Frederique Constant SA. Is that correct? —BarrelProof (talk) 08:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Alpina
Talk:Newbury Park tube station

message: I have been commuting from Newbury Park station since 1994, but haven't noticed the Ohel David synagogue. Where is it exactly? best Sunil060902 (talk) 17:04, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't. The Ohel David Eastern Synagogue is actually in Golders Green. The edit, on 20 April 2005, was made by User:RachelBrown, a user subsequently blocked for sockpuppetry, so it's probably false information - it's certainly improbable. An examination of Multimap's local map supports this assessment as it shows three synagogues in the area local to the station but none at or adjacent to the station itself. I have deleted the sentence. --DavidCane (talk) 23:46, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Mystery solved, thanks! Sunil060902 (talk) 23:31, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synagogue
Template talk:Austin, Texas

message: I reorganized this template as it was before just a long list of random items. I kept most of the items in the original template, although there were a few that were so specific as to make for questionable inclusion. I also added a few.
Please feel free to change anything I have done.
--Mcorazao (talk) 16:42, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw Blues in the Night in the 1997-1998 season on the Kleberg state, but don't know what dates to list. Anyone know? Here is their nod to it. https://zachtheatre.org/cool_timeline/1992-1993-season-2-2-2-2-2/ and https://www.austinchronicle.com/arts/1997-06-27/529144/ It tops my list of Zach musicals. 2600:1700:9A60:4450:6D7D:BF8:DF68:6A8A (talk) 06:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization 

message: I didn't realize until now that Fuddruckers was based in Austin. However, this is no longer the case - I've removed it from the template (at the same time, I fixed the spelling for Schlotzsky's). -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 18:28, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuddrucker's
Talk:Kupa Synagogue

message: Hi. I've re-added the citation needed tag which was deleted yesterday. To clarify policy on citations for those not clear on the approach we have here, we do need external sources - pointing readers to other Wikipedia articles isn't regarded as good enough (especially if that's just in edit comments...) SP-KP 18:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Poeticbent  talk  18:52, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed  
Talk:Tarkine

message: Also, how can an area be both "wilderness" and containing "a high concentration of Aboriginal sites"??Just nigel (talk) 06:23, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Rainforest area

message: I've removed the section on Political History as it's unreferenced and subjective, and does not meet NPOV requirements.
The fact that a large portion of the tarkine is state forest has no bearing on MRT being able to issue licences for mineral exploration, they can do so for any unreserved and some types of reserved land, including private property. The tarkine has not been mined for decades, but for approximately 140 years, since the 1870s when Mt Bischoff was discovered. This is not the result of the area being categorised as state forest, which is a modern land-use classification.MFdeS (talk) 06:46, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed political history section - highly POV 

message: The section on 'Mining in the Tarkine' is very poorly written and needs significant revision. It currently appears to be a mish-mash of gramatically-challenged statements of two opposing POVs. I propose removing it altogether unless significantly re-written.MFdeS (talk) 06:55, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added some references and highlighted with "citation needed" the many unreferenced, POV claims present in this section. In my opinion they have no place in an NPOV article and should probably be removed. MFdeS (talk) 02:29, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mining in the Tarkine
Talk:Jacques de Sores

message: The text mentions that in 1555 Jacques de Sores organised a play to insult the Pope. It is unclear from the text who was the target of his mocking. There were three popes in 1555: Pope Julius III (died in March), who was mostly known for a hedonistic lifestyle and his apparently inappropriate relationship with his favorite Innocenzo Ciocchi Del Monte, Pope Marcellus II (died in May), an experienced librarian who was sick for his entire short term and accomplished nothing, and Pope Paul IV, an experienced diplomat who is known for bringing the Papal States in conflict with Spain, for his authoritarian rule of the Church, for his open hostility to Protestant "heretics", and for his persecution of Jews. 
Which of the three was the target? Dimadick (talk) 13:36, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Incite!

message: Has Incite! changed its name? The website generally just says "Incite!", although on the "about" page it says "INCITE! Women, Gender Non-Conforming, and Trans people of Color* Against Violence". I'm thinking maybe this page should be moved to just "Incite!" (And to get rid of the all-caps per MOS:ALLCAPS.) -- Irn (talk) 05:51, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems the organization did change their name, I am editing this into the lead. Although, I think the page should not just be Incite! but include the full subtitle as well. Red 00 (talk) 23:27, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon reviewing the title and move rules on wikipedia, and researching how this organization is referred to in the media, it seems that both names are used. For example these sources from 2017 (one, two) use the old name while this source from 2015 uses the new name. I concur with Irn above that the move should be title Incite!, no caps, and the relevant information on the new and old title should be included in the lead. Red 00 (talk) 01:53, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change? 
Category talk:WikiProject Color articles needing infobox sources

message: The category is still incomplete since all the articles using the infobox template have not been touched yet. PaleAqua 07:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have finished populating all the colors pages. Future unsourced infoboxes should be automatically added. I still need to add logic to exclude non-main pages from this list. PaleAqua 08:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Populating the category
Talk:19th Motor Rifle Division

message: Can these be included in the intro section for full name of the unit?--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 01:46, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Division honorifics 

message: Is it a regiment, as shown in the text, or a battalion, as shown in the graphic?  My guess is that it is what we used to call an Independent Tank Battalion (ITB) -- a tank battalion that is not part of a tank regiment, but I would like verification.  CsikosLo (talk) 11:49, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  141st Separate Tank Regiment?
Talk:Walbrook

message: * A local map of the brook
*pictures of the brook
*further indications of why this little brook is NOTABLE enough to have a Wikipedia Page!
IceDragon64 (talk) 00:17, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This "little brook" is pretty much why London (the original Roman city in any case) was built where it was. And anyway, the article is not just about the watercourse, but also the 1000-year old City ward. David (talk) 11:13, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs 

message: Suggest the river content could be split off into a separate River Walbrook article. Although connected, the river and the ward are quite different subjects, both of significance to London. --Gapfall (talk) 19:24, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: A separate article on the river would seem sensible...Jokulhlaup (talk) 12:29, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

text: Support: A separate article on the ward in the City of London would help in mentioning people from the ward, contrasted with the river itself.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 17:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

text: Support: Many wards and their namesakes - eg city gates - are handled in an inconsistent way. Better to split them in some way AlasdairDaw (talk) 12:07, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose split
Talk:Cornhill, London

message: The world's first public toilet didn't open in 1855, since the ancient world was full of public conveniences. It may be the first modern one underground but I'd like to see evidence of this.Gymnophoria (talk) 10:50, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The statement is taken from the book which is clearly cited. The statement in the book reads as follows: "Underneath the pavement here is the world's first municipal public lavatory, which was also the world's first underground public lavatory, opened in 1855. The charge was 1d, which became the standard fee and the origin of the expression to 'spend a penny'." I believe the key word here is that it was the first public lavatory. --TBM10 (talk) 16:57, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "World's first public toilet" 

message: The Wikipedia article for St Michael, Cornhill expresses doubt that Wren had anything to do with the church that was rebuilt after the great fire, but points out that the upper parts of the tower are known to be by Hawksmoor. Thomas Peardew (talk) 12:50, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  St Michael's Cornhill
Talk:Billingsgate

message: Can someone correct the link text please. Jackiespeel (talk) 18:06, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Ward Club
Talk:Bassishaw

message: The Clock Museum has moved -and the space is now occupied by a Police Museum, so the section needs rewriting. Jackiespeel (talk) 09:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Points of interest 
MediaWiki talk:Newuserlogpagetext

message: Should read "bear in mind they may be acting". That's bear as in hold, or keep. — coelacan — 07:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: D'oh!  Thanks for that. John Reaves (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I fixed this to when the log starts, 7 September 2005, but someone has reverted it back. Please undo. Thanks, Majorly (talk) 17:16, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that you don't want to wheel war, which is entirely appropriate, but you don't need the editprotected tag either :D.  Remember WP:SILENCE: the onus is on Random to explain what's wrong with the change (I haven't got a clue which is right, so don't look at me!), otherwise there's nothing wrong with you restoring it IMO. Happy‑melon 17:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot restore it, someone else will have to. Anyway, doesn't matter. Majorly (talk) 18:24, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed it to "This log contains accounts created from September 2005 onward." I don't see any evidence that the log was more accurate starting in June 2006. I've been looking at the log, and it looks like there are just as many names from April and May 2006 as there are from June 2006. --Bongwarrior (talk) 05:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start of log 

message: Please Define the link target in role accounts to role accounts no need to send that to a redirect.  Mlpearc (open channel) 23:59, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: — xaosflux Talk 04:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  Mlpearc (open channel) 15:10, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define link target 

message: There's a typo in the description of the new user log page: "Please contact an oversighter rahter" should be "rather".  Could someone with edit rights fix this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Myoglobin (talk • contribs) 01:32, 7 March 2016‎ (UTC)
: — xaosflux Talk 03:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo fix 

message: Impersonation of a non-notable person is also a violation. Policy says "specific, identifiable person", not "notable living person". Peter James (talk) 22:56, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real names
Talk:Cathedral Gardens

message: I think that we can have a really nice walk there. It sounds really good and really nice so you can go there 82.21.16.195 (talk) 21:07, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Cathedral Gardens
Talk:Elections in Nigeria

message: Is there a rule that winner must win a certain number of votes in some number of states, to show national support? Numbersinstitute (talk) 22:43, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Numbersinstitute A very late response, but, what do you mean national support? For example, a presidential candidate is supposed to have the highest number of vote count across the country to be declare winner, I mean, this is just stated was demonstrated in the this year's election. Despite not winning "FCT" which a lot of people claimed a candidate must win that state to be declare winner, also, that, a candidate must win 25% of total votes bla bla bla. Alas, it's up to INEC, I don't want to say anything more. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Votes needed by state?
Talk:2007 Nigerian general election

message: Added here, removed here
Reports are rife of irregularities at polls across the nation. In the South Eastern state of Anambra for instance, neither the poll officials nor the ballot materials were sighted at most designated polling centres. where sighted, at all, they came very late, so late as to rubbish the 3.00p.m. closing time for voting. In a particular centre where i voted in Ekwulobia, Aguata Local Government Area of Anambra state, balloting started at after 4.00pm, and even then most of the registered voters who turned up with their temporary ID cards could not vote because their names were not on the displayed voter's register. of course, the voter's register was never displayed for public scrutiny before the election. at that polling booth only one ballot box was provided for the two elections, leaving one to wonder how the votes were to be collated.
The above is definitely interesting, and surely true, but it is original research all the same, so I removed it. Picaroon 23:14, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary moved from article 

message: Is it necessary to have that "all you need to know about Nigeria" lede at the very top of this article? Sources should not be singular and it seems that compelling people to consider only one source defeats the purpose of an encyclopedic article.
--Bwryan2006 15:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you be more specific? I don't see anything of the sort. Picaroon 23:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance of BBC article

message: "If successfully completed, the 2007 presidential election will mark Nigeria's first peaceful handover from one democratically elected president at the end of his constitutional term to the next."
Passages like this give the impression that this was a fair and honest election - I'm concerned that the Background section is misleading in this respect. Any thoughts? Lost Number 12:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I rephrased it. Wizzy…☎ 16:49, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Jolly good. Lost Number 08:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Legitimacy

message: How come the INEC website not only gives different vote totals, but also a different list of candidates? http://www.inecnigeria.org/election/show_result.php?catagory=Presidential Intelligent Mr Toad 23:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Candidates
Talk:Nepomuk

message: Does anyone have information re: the etymology of the town's name?  This information would be useful more widely as well, given that St. John of Nepomuk is the patron saint of Bohemia / the Czech Republic, being from there (when it was known as Pomuk), is known by its designation and, I'm guessing, inspired its use among all of those Holy Roman Empire and Austrian / Austro-Hungarian Empire aristocrats who had it as a secondary name... (comment added in 2017)
:Please add the etymology of this town's name to this article. 76.189.141.37 (talk) 19:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: (2 years later) Please add the etymology of this town's name to this article. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 23:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology of name?
Talk:Sea Monsters: A Prehistoric Adventure (video game)

message: I've got the DS box art, so should I go ahead and upload/add it? Or is there a reason why it isn't here? Thanks.  --Filovirus 05:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box art 

message: The Page "List of Wii Games" here on Wikipedia says this game was released over a month ago in both Europe and America. Is this true? I haven't seen it in stores anywhere.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.251.83.69 (talk) 18:06, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Released? 

message: If no one objects, I will begin a merge of this page into Sea Monsters: A Prehistoric Adventure. I'll give everyone til the 21st of this month then I'll start the merge. He's Gone Mental 12:21, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
File talk:Friedel Crafts mechanism.png

message: Thankyou very much for uploading this mechanism for the Friedel-Crafts reactions. I was studying for chemistry and trying to understand this mech, but couldn't find it on Wikipedia--which was a great disappointment because I like to think that Wikip. has everything!
So I uploaded my (tacky) version of the mech for others--it's nice to see the neater diagram.
If anyone has any suggestions as to programs that are good for drawing such mechanisms, could they please leave a comment on my User:talk page?
Thanks! --Willemhenskens 08:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thankyou--[[User:Willemhenskens|Willemhenskens]] 08:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nymburk

message: Hello! I've created Ukrainian version of page about Nymburk, could you help to bind it to other languages, please?
https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%80%D0%BA TheMrBooblik (talk) 20:27, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uk lang version created
Talk:SerPUNt

message: In the first paragraph: "The name refers to the fact that episodes of TV shows usually have names that are puns."
Is there any evidence of this or is it just someone's opinion of what the title means? 71.56.86.252 08:06, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Opava

message: From the page "Duchy of Troppau"
"The duchy was created from lands split off from the Margraviate of Moravia before 1269[1] by King Ottokar II of Bohemia to provide for his natural son, Nicholas I, Duke of Troppau, as he was henceforth known"
So from its inception as a Duchy, it was known as Troppau- Should not the Danzig Rule apply here- to remove all German traces from history is NPOV; to call it the "Austrian Duchy of Opava" is as inaccurate as saying the "Duchy of Warschau" after 1918 it should rightly be then called Opava.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rikaard (talk • contribs) 02:11, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical names in history section 

message: There was once a synagogue in Opava and it has an article (Synagogue in Opava). The synagogue should be mentioned here at least with See also.--Wanfried-Dublin (talk) 09:42, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to synagogue 
Talk:Orlová

message: Most of it what is wroted down about town where I spend 18 years is true. But with some things I can not agree. Cos Orlová didnt have in the middle ages agricultural charakter. Of course that a few fields was there as everywhere in the middle ages cos people have to feed themselves somehow. But one specific thing i can not found in this article. In the middle ages Orlová was an important town. Cos there was a manifactury for religious clothes. That was in that times important and it make town higher then other small town around. Even in 18th century there was a very nice manor house, which was rebuilt in 19th century to the hospital. As is said in the artical many buildings are demolished cos of intensive mining of cool, so even this manor house does not exist today. But we can still find a nice garden after it. In 20th century there was even a man who like castles so much. So he tryed to build a castle. The walls was already about 10m high when comunist decide to build cross that new castle a new road cos city was expanding. In that times many people comes to Orlová and from 8000 inhabitants city grow up to 20000. New road was builded and stones from castles and even the place where the castle was build get used for it. After a few years there was build several typical comunist monuments.....grey high panel buildings and city grow up to 57000 inhabitants. In that times goverment begin with building a new city called Havířov. (In area slang miner is havíř...from that comes the name of a city) After a few periods of closing the mines people goes out from the city and even one part called Doubrava get separeted. Today in Orlová lives about 40000 people....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.70.192.1 (talk) 09:16, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Pelhřimov

message: "In 1446-1450 Pelhřimov was chosen as the venue of land diets, attended in person even by the king Jiří of Poděbrady."  'diets' probably isn't the correct word.  I think 'deities' might be the closest, but that doesn't make much sense in the sentence either. Any other thoughts?  Comatmebro (talk) 22:04, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems likely to be "diets" in the sense of "A council or assembly of leaders; a formal deliberative assembly" (see :wikt:diet#Noun item 4). That's just a guess, though. --Stfg (talk) 16:18, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That is certainly my interpretation. Edited accordingly. --Greenmaven (talk) 09:59, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled