Talk:Naruto: Clash of Ninja Revolution

message: Here is a link to the proof:
It clearly states, "14 new characters, including some never before seen in the Clash of Ninja series".
This means that this could very well be GNT3.
Everytime I add this, it gets deleted though!
Kylemcauliffe15 23:39, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The 14 Characters Are New Ones!

message: sasuke is a characters! If you read the NP article it says you can end the match between SASUKE and Itachi —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.234.190.110 (talk) 00:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sasuke 

message: Nintendo Power even said that it would come out in America in Fall of this year. Please stop deleting this information. Link 486 12:54, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cite it and we won't have this problem anymore. Add Nintendo Power volume/issue #, page #. to the article, except change the #'s to whatever the issue and page numbers may be. Also, don't forget to drop the nowiki's or it obviously won't work. // DecaimientoPoético 21:30, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The USA release 

message: Shouldn't we just add a Rumored Characters section for those who think they will be in the game? I mean it's a pain in the ass reverting all of those edits by IPs adding unconfirmed characters to the list of confirmed characters section. And when they get confirmed, they can be added to the list of Confirmed characters. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Super World Champions (talk • contribs) 01:34, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. We aren't here to list rumoured characters or make a list of wanted characters (and yes, I've actually seen such a thing on Wikipedia before). If a character who has previously been added to the article but removed due to lack of proof that they appear in the game is later proven to be a playable character, then we'll just add them back. // DecaimientoPoético 21:25, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

text: We are not adding rumoured characters, and it is not a good idea. It's pointless and unencyclopedic. // DecaimientoPoético 01:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumored Characters 

message: where is ur proof that Shikamaru is in the game i not getting mad but i relly want to get this game and i what to know if Shikamaru is a playable character. hellgaets 6:21 may 24 2007 (UTC)
:go to silionera.com and it would show you pictures of shikamaru in the game fighting--4.255.202.22 03:07, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character Confirmations 

message: In the confirmed charadcters section, should we mention things like kyuubi and sharingan? MindWraith 01:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally don't think so. It is part of the character, and if it is listed, people may think it is an actual character instead of an in-game transformation. ryne11 00:24, 28 June 2007
Good point, but on the articles for dragonball z games, it has in-game transformations like super saiyan in brackets next to the character. MindWraith 09:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

text: The only Dragon Ball games that should list Super Saiyans and other transformations as playable characters are the Tenkaichi games, since specific transformations can be selected before the start of a fight. On articles such as the Budokai ones, it should really only list the characters' names, IMHO. Characters like Kyubi Naruto in the Naruto articles should not be listed unless they are separate characters, like in Clash of Ninja 2. In-game trasnformations don't really count as being separate or playable characters themselves. // DecaimientoPoético 16:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate forms