lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Corned beef and cabbage

message: There's no need to link to the article on meals, nor is there any need for the template mentioning the "main article." For some reason, I cannot remove these myself. --Jitterro 23:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: FYI

message: Maybe we need to split again. Corned beef and cabbage is corned beef and cabbage, New England boiled dinner is never just those two items, and adding turnip and carrot and parsnip to corned beef and cabbage makes it a different dish. But perhaps my real reason for this comment is that I have a beautiful picture of presentation of a New England boiled dinner, taken by myself, and it seems not to be appropriate as an illustration to corned beef and cabbage! --Dumarest 11:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have rethought this. Looking at a number of recipes for New England boiled dinner, I see that it is commonly called corned beef and cabbage. That is maybe the commonest terminology, but the real thing is NOT corned beef and cabbage but has other vegetables in it and corned beef and cabbage is a variety of the boiled dinner. I am thinking of changing things - have 'Corned beef and cabbage' refer to 'New England boiled dinner', which will be the new title of this item or copy what is here into the existing edited 'New England boiled dinner' Comments welcome, if anyone will. --Dumarest 18:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So done. --Dumarest 19:15, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Corned beef and cabbage / New England Boiled Dinner
Talk:Coat of arms of the Prince of Asturias

message: The enté en pointe per pale Flanders and Tyrol looks a bit misshapen and more like per bend sinister Burgundy ancient and Flanders in the third quarter and per bend Tyrol and Brabant in the fourth. Opera hat (talk) 12:41, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  image for 1761-1868/1875-1931 

message: Variants of titles as Prince of Girona, Viana etc. are inappropriate here, this is an article related with the title of Prince of Asturias. --Galico (talk) 16:03, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variants of other titles inappropriate here
Talk:Miller's knot

message: How on earth is any one going to expand this article. I think is should be merged Len 23:26, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, what to do...  There is some reason to think that "Miller's knot", "Sack knot", and "Bag knot" are effectively interchangable terms for several simple binding knots including: ABOK #388, #389 and #390. (and perhaps others)   I'd think that this page, Miller's knot, would be a reasonable place to redirect both Bag knot and Sack knot.   Each of the knots traditionally known by these names can be illustrated and described on a single page.  The section on #390 here could point to a "Main article" at Ground-line hitch since that particular knot is also effective as a hitch and is known specifically by that name.  How does that sound? --Dfred 20:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Bris

message: Maybe point to the connection between the pigman and O Lucky Man!..?  
Murgh 23:29, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: pigman

message: about to remove the 'controversy' section because it plagiarizes directly from imdb and i can't find information about it elsewhere 
Slioganach (talk) 09:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: controversy
Talk:Southeastern District of the Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod

message: I am removing the extended list of congregations & missions.  I certainly see the value of an article on a middle judicatory for a major american denomination, but not for the directory style list. Athanasius • Quicumque vult  19:11, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:NOTDIR]]
Talk:'15' Certificate

message: I think that this should be made a redirect to BBFC, and the table of current certificates should be expanded to tell the criteria that movies meet to get the rating in question.  I'd do it myself, but I'm not familiar with the BBFC certificates and the respective criteria.--Vercalos 23:31, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am making this orphaned page a redirect to BBFC without amendments to BBFC.  This is because all the information in this article is included and expanded on the BBFC site which is linked to from the BBFC page, therefore writing this info into the BBFC article would be unnecessary duplication. Jezzerk 15:14, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not exactly true.  Does that mean we don't write down anything here that isn't on the internet?  I'm not sure I understand your reasoning.--Vercalos 18:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Armor & Sturtevant

message: Removed advert link by the Chicago Tribune.   Timmy12 23:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Please explain the need for this tag. Who are you referring to. If it's me, this group appeared at an event I help organize, from which I get no monetary compensation, in 1997. They disbanded in 2005. Not too much COI in that.Rosencomet (talk) 14:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: COI Tag

message: I agree with the multiple issue tags.  This article could really use some more input. Justinkrivers (talk) 04:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple Issues
Talk:280 (number)

message: in responce to: "Removed tidbit about *288 on Verizon phones (it was spelled wrong, lacked citation and was put in the wrong place anyway)" so, where would you put it? you find a verizion phone and try it.....nothing on google or ask.com says it, so how could it be cited.  The people should know!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.141.232.171 (talk) 23:34, 2006 October 27 (UTC)
:Where would you put it? On the same line as the other things about 288, NOT below the line about 289.
:How could it be cited? You can cite the owner's manual. Or maybe there's a newspaper article somewhere announcing the new feature. CompositeFan 22:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed tidbit

message: I propose merging 284 (number) into 280 (number), in the same way that other non-notable numbers in the 280-290 range are discussed there. As far as I can see, WP:NNUMBER is not met. The only genuinely interesting mathematical property of 284 is that with 220 it forms the lowest pair of amicable numbers; David Wells's Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Numbers and What's Special About This Number? mention this but no other interesting properties. That's not enough to justify a separate article and we can instead just mention this property at 280 (number)#284. Lennart97 (talk) 14:52, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there seems to be no opposition, I've performed the merge. Lennart97 (talk) 15:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Debile

message: This is rediculous. I take a moment to get my referecnes straight and you are already planning on deleting the article? How about giving a person the benefit of the doubt for more than 10 minutes?
Or how about marking it a stub like the companion article? How about doing your duty and actually explaining the stub process? I would look into it myself but it seems that the article I am working on will be deleted long before I figure out how that works.
:Hi Grauenwolf! Please don't get angry. Instead, add some context to the article so that the tag no longer applies. Right now, despite the addition of a stub tag and a reference, the best I can make out is that a debile is a part of a fencing foil. Not even sure if that's correct.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:46, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My applogies. I didn't mean to lose my temper.Grauenwolf 04:11, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Queen of the Pacific

message: This page was further edited to indicate the historical nature of this ship. Pardon my newbiness and learning of Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dangfrslo (talk • contribs) 23:40, 27 October 2006 UTC
:Not a problem, whoever you are.  It was a golden opportunity to research more Queens of the Pacific and I had a great time. Athaenara talk 07:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't realize you were Dangfrslo when I left my previous note.  Athaenara talk 04:04, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article
Talk:Confessions (book)

message: I am changing the redirect on this page to the main Augustine disamb page. It is wrong to have it point to one of the books when the other is just as important. Also, I am changing the links on the pages that point to this page to point either to the disamb or to the respective "Confessions". Rares 23:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link
Talk:Kirra, Phocis

message: I had to remove a section that was copied from , since that text is copyrighted by the Prefecture of Phocis and we can't release it here. Other than that, it looks like a great start. I think the next step should be to seek out reliable sources to be used as formal references. Melchoir 23:56, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gustav Horn, Count of Pori

message: Of course,  there was no "count of Pori"  in the Swedish aristocracy,  this is an anachronism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.65.145.15 (talk) 23:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was No consensus Duja► 09:45, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
*Strongly support Of course where English names are in use they are the ones to be used, also i Wikipedia. However, for a large number of foreign subjects there are no English translation of their names. When it comes to Swedish historical persons, without any translated names, the Swedish names are to be used. This should mean that Swedish names should be used for all, but historical royalties. For some reason Finnish names are used for many Swedish historical persons. This must be considered incorrect. Finland was not a separate state, not even a separate region of Sweden. It was fully incorporated, in difference for example Scotland with the UK, and the Finnish language had no official recognition in this State. Finland as a separate area was invented in 1809, when it became part of the Russian empire, but not even then did the Finnish language become an official language. Of course Finnish names should be used for Finnish persons, but for the Counts Horn or for that part the more recent Marshal Baron Mannerheim, they must correctly be named in Swedish. If Wikipedia should use present translations of historical names consequently, this would mean that for example the German Prince von Pless, would be known as the Prince von Pszczyna, the Irish dukes of Leinster as the dukes of Laighin or the Austrian dukes of Teschen would be called dukes of Český Těšín. The consquence of this would only be confusion and for this reason I strongly suggest a cleanup among Finnish names on historical Swedes.
Carl (not Kaarlo) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwestgren (talk • contribs) 00:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horn af Björneborg 

message: Horn did not fight against the Saxons at Breitenfeld. The Saxons were allied with the Swedes (both being protestant) against Tilly's Imperial, Catholic force.  John George was routed by the right wing of the Catholic force (under the command of Furstenberg).  Horn, who was next in formation beside John George maneuvered his soldiers to prevent Furstenberg's men from flanking the main body of the Swedish force. Like so: [1][2] [3].  Thanks.   Staple (talk) 08:21, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breitenfeld
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines/Airport clubs

message: Information Listed Here...
===Locations===
The following locations are Northwest Airlines WorldClub locations:
*Boston
*Chicago O'Hare Shared with Continental Airlines
*Detroit (4)
*Honolulu
*Los Angeles
*Manila
*Memphis
*Milwaukee
*Minneapolis/St. Paul (2)	
*Newark
*New York La Guardia
*Portland
*San Francisco
*Seattle/Tacoma
*Seoul
*Tokyo Narita (2)
*Washington Dulles
*Washington Reagan
Northwest Airlines WorldClub members are allowed to use partner clubs, which offer more clubs in more locations.  For partner club information, visit nwa.com: .--Golich17 03:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WorldClubs

message: The following locations are Northwest Airlines WorldClub locations:
*Boston
*Chicago O'Hare Shared with Continental Airlines
*Detroit (4)
*Honolulu
*Los Angeles
*Manila
*Memphis
*Milwaukee
*Minneapolis/St. Paul (2)	
*Newark
*New York La Guardia
*Portland
*San Francisco
*Seattle/Tacoma
*Seoul
*Tokyo Narita (2)
*Washington Dulles
*Washington Reagan
Northwest Airlines WorldClub members are allowed to use partner clubs, which offer more clubs in more locations.  For partner club information, visit nwa.com: .--Golich17 03:58, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Locations
Talk:Friendship bench

message: This article needs to be re-written by someone with expert knowledge--someone who can make this much clearer.  Much, much much more clearer.  --StevenL 00:11, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has been updated however keeps getting flagged for paraphrasing so is a work in progress. It has come a long way since 2006 and so hopefully is now becoming clearer. HelloWiki2022 (talk) 05:07, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The 2006 version of the article was about benches in American schools, which was later expanded to include the Zimbabwean mental health program. The school content has since been split out to the buddy bench article. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:56, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused
Talk:Danwan Jiao

message: Maybe this page should be at Swallow Reef, because that name seems more neutral than a Chinese or Malaysian name (since those countries are claiming ownership of the island/reef), not to mention that this is the English Wikipedia.  I might have left other POV stuff in, as I don't know much about the subject, so feel free to fix. --Galaxiaad 00:13, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Farringdon Within

message: It is stated in the article that he was Lord Mayor in 1281-2, when the WP list and  indicate that the correct reference should be to Henry le Walleis/Henry Wallein: can someone clarify the matter. Jackiespeel (talk) 11:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  William Farindon
Talk:Annie Laurie Gaylor

message: Gaylor is co-founder and co-president of one of the most active atheist organizations in the United States. I believe that she's notable enough for an article. I've removed the notability tag for that reason.  Joyous! | Talk 02:18, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  notablility tag removed 

message: this article is in deperate need of updating. I'm going to give it a shot! Cap020570 (talk) 20:52, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: needs work

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Alexander Keith Johnston (1804–1871)

message: The article refers to Johnston's  The National Atlas of General Geography, published in 1843. However I can find no record of an Atlas with this name. The National Library of Scotland's catalogue has The National Atlas of Historical, Commercial and Political Geography published in 1843, so I guess this is the work referred to. There is also the later Half-crown national atlas of general geography, so this may explain the confusion. Unless someone has bibliographic evidence for an 1843 National Atlas of General Geography I will correct this.Kognos (talk) 15:50, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated thee title and tidies up a few citations.Kognos (talk) 15:54, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Atlas 

message: The article has two  conflicting dates for when the Royal Atlas was published, one saying it was first published in 1855, the other saying it was first published in 1861 :  'The Royal Atlas of Modern Geography was first published in 1855 and served as an atlas of military geography to accompany Alison's History of Europe published in 1848.' 
and 
'In 1861, Johnston published the first edition of the Royal Atlas of Modern Geography with 48 maps.' DlronW (talk) 14:30, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two conflicting dates for when the Royal Atlas was published
Talk:DASH diet

message: This article seems to be focused too much on the studies, and not enough on the diet itself, which is probably what most people want to read about. The details of the study design etc. can probably be relegated to a separate page, with this page describing the diet itself in more detail. -Nren4237 (talk) 12:33, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Focus of the article

message: Just follow the example given in the two already in the article. Post here or on my talk page if you have any questions.
*Tips for following the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet
*The DASH Diet -- Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension
*Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (The DASH Diet) 
*Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH)
*Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension
*Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH)
There's likely a lot of similarities between these, and I recommend looking for more articles as sources. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:30, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the relevance of the above comment?  The NIH is an authority on the subject, no matter what country the organization is based in.  Omnibus (talk) 19:09, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: More links that could be incorporated

message: Whoever wrote this should really, really, read about how to cite sources on Wikipedia. All but one references in this article were broken, I am fixing it now. --elwood_j_blues (talk) 19:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've believe I've cleaned up the citations. -Optigan13 (talk) 07:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Other than scattered allusions (which can be summarised as "eat things everyone knows are healthy and reduce things that everyone knows are unhealthy), there's almost no info in this article to describe the DASH diet.
If I increase my fruit, veg, and grains, replace fatty meat with lean meat, and decrease my salt and saturated fats, am I on the DASH diet? Gronky (talk) 13:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Took some time, but I added a Description section, hope this answers your request  --Signimu (talk) 16:26, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, eh, what is the DASH diet? 

message: I think one of the ways to improve this article is including some health benefits of the DASH diet. See the wiki article on the mediterranean diet for example. AlphanMangos (talk) 19:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed it was discussed a little bit in the second paragraph of the first section but separating it into it's own section as "health benefits" may make it easier for users to find the information AlphanMangos (talk) 04:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a section for Health Benefits?
Talk:Bảo Thăng

message: What was his full name? Badagnani (talk) 02:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Full name

message: I do not know English, the phrase is translated by Google Translate. All the words in the name of "Nguyễn Phúc Bảo Thắng" are derived from Chinese. Chinese characters "阮福宝嶹" in the article "Bảo Thắng" Sino-Vietnamese reading is "Nguyễn Phúc Bảo Đảo", not "Nguyễn Phúc Bảo Thắng". "Đảo" 嶹 means "island". There are many Chinese characters that sound the same but with different meanings and many different writing but mean the same thing. There are many Chinese characters are pronounced "bảo" and "thắng". Can not arbitrarily replace them for each other. Hsumei (talk) 04:35, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I restored the :Template:Infobox Chinese removed by Hsumei, here. He left the abaove message on my talk page and removed it again, so I restored it with the spelling used on the Chinese Bảo Thắng article. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 19:10, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

text: I do not know why you are telling me about Nipponese Dog Calvero. However you have convinced me a citation is needed for how the name is represented in Chinese. I will just removed the box. In the future just say "Wrong spelling and uncited" in the edit summary for this sort of thing and people will not make a fuss. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 07:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, User:Richard-of-Earth, just spotted this. User:Hsumei seems to be a good faith editor from vi.wp who has undone several cases of vandalism on en.wp by Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Nipponese Dog Calvero and others. However I think it looks okay now, I will watchlist the article in case any more hassle occurs. Just letting you know, and thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:27, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Chinese 