lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Antauro Humala

message: Two brothers, revolutionaries, one in prison pending murder charges, the other running for President of Peru.  The candidate was supported by Venuzuela President Hugo Chavez and the standing Peruvian gov't recalled it's ambassador with concerns about election interference.  Venazuela is accused of trying to gather central American nations together as allies against the United States policies in the region.  What do others think?
:I deleted your comments on Ollanta.  This article is about Antauro.  Also, Peru is not in Central America. --Descendall 22:59, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Me, Walter Humala, mayored in economics from UNMSM argues that Antauro acted different from his brother Ollanta, the first made a popular insurgence against the excluding politic of the government. Talkin' he whit me on 2004, he said that if he has no success on his revolt he would assume all consecuences of being in jail.
Ollanta Humala told me a year ago, he didn't agree with his little brother ideology and methods. He wanted to give a better future for Perú through the democratic way. 
--Walter Humala 02:01, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Cousin's Opinion 
Talk:Satan in fiction

message: This article should be merged into the "Satan" page as a section. Discuss. TCorp 16:30, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as some users have noted before, the info here is too nonsensical and generally uneccesary to be merged with the "Satan" article. Mentions and appearances of Satan in fiction that can be considered worthwhile mentions are those of, for example, in The Divine Comedy, Paradise Lost, The Mysterious Stranger, and Piers Plowman. Of course, that's only my opinion. Satanael 20:58, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Section is too long and contains subtrivial information. Because of the large influx of amateur editors whose only interests are in listig off any mention they can think of, fiction sections (or expanded disambiguation pages with fiction references) are typically being split off of mythological/folkloric characters to avoid losing the academic context of the main article. See Vampire fiction, Werewolves in fiction, Chimera (disambiguation page) versus Chimera (mythology), Leviathan versus Leviathan (disambiguation) and so forth and so on. A merge here would not help matters in the slightest. DreamGuy 23:26, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Satan]]
Talk:Emory Remington

message: I added Marsteller's name to your list at the end. Jeffmatt 16:33, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: nice job!
Talk:Bergen (geography)

message: it was quite fun finding some verification to debunk the claim of 100.000 places named Bergen.
FWIW, the most popular name in the databases I searched is San Jose - 1716 occurences.
There are probably places that are too small to make those datafiles named Bergen. But there are probably plenty of such places named San Jose too. Alvestrand 16:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popularity of the name
Template talk:Warning

message: I am requesting that this template's image is replaced with :Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg. Also I think that  should be on the page (wrapped in noinclude tags of course). Funpika 19:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 19:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the image and put on {{Tl|Pp-template}} 

message: Needs Category:Talk header templates. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 21:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 01:21, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorize

message: Please replace the bit between noinclude tags with  (but leave the  tag). Melsaran (talk) 17:45, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 18:20, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Done and done. Yes, much nicer. --David Göthberg (talk) 18:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:DOC|/doc]]

message: Please add interwiki links: xh:Template:Isilumkiso, and zu:Template:Isixwayiso. --Blake3522 03:13, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please add interwiki links: ja:Template:警告 --203.165.100.98 (talk) 09:15, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done - All three added to the /doc page. --David Göthberg (talk) 01:48, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add interwiki links 

message: This is just a minor Wikidata update to this template.  Please modify the last part of the code as follows:
* from this:
}}
* to this:
}}



Thank you in advance! – Paine  02:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:58, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much, Martin (MSGJ)! – Paine  21:31, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 9 August 2015 

message: Please implement , which introduces a parameter that allows custom resizing of the image. Thanks! Sdkb (talk) 09:30, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Izno (talk) 13:19, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 10 March 2020 

message: As the example on this talk page demonstrates, this template should be obvious to anyone coming to an article talk page. By making it have the same yellowish background, however, this intent is foiled.  The template that is supposed to create an eye-catching warning that should grab the attention of the reader simply fades into the large yellow block at the top of almost every talk page.  See Talk:List of marine biologists or Talk:British Isles or Talk:Feminazi for examples. The template message disappears into the yellow noise and is very easily ignored. Changing the background to pink or even white with a red border would make it stand out and tell new editors on a talk page to stop and pay attention much better. How would gaining consensus to make this behavior change be best accomplished? Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:54, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box behavior on talk pages
Talk:Jaroslav Rudnyckyj

message: To whoever edited out the information about Rudnyckyj's Ukrainian-German dictionaries, this information is important both because of the value of the dictionaries themselves, and also because they document his development as a lexicographer, which in the opinion of some, is probably his greatest contribution to scholarship. Please give your rationale for such, in my opinion, untoward edits. Regards, Mike Stoyik 17:03, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Ragged-Trousered Philanthropists

message: ...but I removed the statement that "Tressell" was a pun on the trestle table. It isn't a pun - puns rely on soundalikes to provide humour. It's a reference though - like bashem and grinder.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.96.164.105 (talk) 01:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pedantic, I know 

message: The text about the Tom MacLennan version included the sentence: "The adaptation was unusual because of its small cast -six actors playing all main characters."  This is true neither of stage adaptations of Tressell's novel (Stephen Lowe's version was written for seven actors), nor of theatre adaptations in general.
Skeowsha (talk) 22:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adaptations  

message: Further to the reference (4.) that mentions Orwell's regard for this novel. 
In chapter three of "Keep the Aspidistra Flying", that Orwell's novel mentions that Gordon Comstock as a budding schoolboy poet and an associated tendency to his being "unreasonable", had become enchanted by the tale of the "starving carpenter who pawns everything but sticks to his aspidistra ... flower of England."120.17.156.236 (talk) 07:28, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Orwell
Talk:Jamey Johnson

message: Looks like there is no mention of his beard, but there is definitely at least some press about it. I don't know if this is true, but I seem to remember hearing that he was doing this in tribute to ZZ Top? Could just be hearsay. I saw him at a small venue where one might talk about things like that, but he doesn't actually talk to the audience very much (no problems with that at all -- he does music for him and that's pretty cool). But I digress, does anyone know anything more? Laundry Week (talk) 22:29, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beard 

message: Why is this link being redirected? I was working on an article for this page, but it's a constant, infinite loop now. Why? QValintyne (talk) 11:58, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know but it seems to meet notability requirements (covered by Washington Post and Alt Sounds; Reviewed by Rolling Stone and Washington Post). A red link works for "articles you intend to create" as well. I guess I say keep working on the article and I look forward to reading it and can always help out if you need anything. Hopefully you wont have any more trouble and, if so, a concerned user will take it up here instead. Laundry Week (talk) 18:00, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the reply. I'll see what I can do to get it all done. I wrote the article for We Walk The Line: A Celebration of the Music of Johnny Cash in order to link Jamey's contributions and the contributions of other artists to their respective pages. I know this is semi-irrelevant to the task at hand, but I would like to get a free-use approved image for that article. If you could help, I'd surely appreciate it! QValintyne (talk) 14:52, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Living For A Song 

message: Invited to join the Opry by Bill Anderson during their appearance on the Opry stage, March 19, 2022. 2600:1004:B118:BFE0:25AF:3D31:6024:C523 (talk) 05:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the note; I've added it. However, I know very little about this subject; this article is only on my watchlist to deal with vandalism. Therefore, if I've worded something incorrectly, that'll be why. Graham87 14:35, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grand Ole Opry
Talk:Danny Tenaglia

message: This whole article reads like his publicist wrote it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.104.245.111 (talk) 15:03, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As mentioned above, the article read like it was written by a publicist. I removed the worst of the original research and peacock phrasing and tried to make the tone more encyclopedic. I tried not to just remove everything that wasn't cited, but as a result it needs a good amount of reliable sourcing on its more verifiable claims. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 16:21, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some progress
Talk:Racoon (band)

message: ==Untitled==
Added an image for the band.  I aligned it left because I feel all you righties unfairly discriminate against lefties.  TotalTommyTerror 17:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: looks nice The Ungovernable Force 07:07, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

text: There's a reason most images are aligned right: left-aligned images mess up the layout :P So does this one, the discography is partially to the right of the image and partially below. I'm not changing it though since your discrimination argument is good :) -- Sander 15:50, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stuff

message: Added an image for the band.  I aligned it left because I feel all you righties unfairly discriminate against lefties.  TotalTommyTerror 17:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: looks nice The Ungovernable Force 07:07, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

text: There's a reason most images are aligned right: left-aligned images mess up the layout :P So does this one, the discography is partially to the right of the image and partially below. I'm not changing it though since your discrimination argument is good :) -- Sander 15:50, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hurricane Ivan (1980)

message: This is a stub.  It needs more info if it is to remain a separate article. Jdorje 17:36, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: :Ugh, I tried telling him. I vote merge for this. There is no information on this storm in the first place, and is not notable enough to have its own article. Hurricanehink 19:44, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Jdorje 20:06, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The storm formed in waters that were below 80 degrees!(just like Vince, Delta, Epsilon and Zeta), isnt that notable? Storm05 20:23, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's one reason, but one reason doesn't warrent. Karl in this year did the same thing, yet it doesn't have an article. It shouldn't as well. Storms that hit nowhere rarely should have an article, with only extreme examples. Landfalling storms should have more than 25 deaths, and some info on how they impacted. Hurricanehink 20:40, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Vince, Epsilon and Zeta all broke or set significant records and Delta killed 7 people in an unusal place (though I'm not sure I agree with its existance). This storm did none of that. -- §Hurricane ERIC§ archive -- my dropsonde 03:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Nope, this was the discussion for when they originally merged this article. --12george1 (talk) 00:08, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Category talk:Wikipedia maintenance templates

message: Why are so many of the Templates filed under "T", but not all of them? --Lph 17:44, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Templates not filed under "T" specified a sort key for the category. It would be nice if all of the maintenance templates used a sort key as sorting on "Template" is not useful. This should be easy to accomplish with a bot, so I added a request. -- Doug Bell (talk/contrib) 03:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Done. – Doug Bell talk•contrib 19:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I linked the word to Wikipedia:subst. —Doug Bell talk•contrib 13:10, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Please see Wikipedia talk:Template standardisation/article#Most maintenance templates should be placed on the talk page. To stop discussions spreading over many pages, if you wish to contribute an opinion on this issue please do so in that section. --PBS 08:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most maintenance templates should be placed on the talk page 

message: I needed it! Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 15:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created: Category:Coherency templates 

message: What's the template for consolidating a whole bunch of maintenance tags?  I know I've seen it before, where you just have one ordinary size box and a scroller with all the specific ones it it, but I can't logically navigate to it for some reason. -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 03:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I found it at the articleissues template.  -Theanphibian (talk • contribs) 04:03, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple tags

message: Use both these words is confusing. They mean pretty much the same thing, however, they are both used in slightly different ways. Based on how Wikipedia:Template messages is organized "maintenance" deals with things like under construction and uncategorized articles whereas "clean up" is about the actual content of the articles. Which I think is a good, but these category don't make that distinction. I think they should match to help avoid confusion. Any suggestions? Rocket000 00:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Maintenance  vs clean up
Talk:Future Problem Solving

message: What else do we want to add here? We should probably put in something about CmPS, Scenario Writing, maybe something describing Internationals and the "cultural blending experience"? Or even FPSers that have gone on to places of leadership. Do you think we could find some examples? 
This is a list for me as well; don't take it the wrong way. We just need to write down what we're doing. Any suggestions?
Iowacrusader 22:31, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just finished a major revamp. I added sections on scenario writing, individual competition, etc, though expansion of CmPS sections are needed. More info on the IC would be cool too. -- Jdcompguy 02:11, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further edits... 

message: Should this article be under Future Problem Solving or Future Problem Solving Program? Thoughts? -- Jdcompguy 02:11, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm - it should probably be under Future Problem Solving Program, but we may want to link a shortcut from 'FPS'(the acronymn) to the site. -- Iowacrusader 16:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article location
Talk:Matt Wong

message: What is this trying to say? As it is, I would like to remove this part
Matthew Wong - a name, mostly by the chinese race due to the last name. However, it is quite a common name. Also known as Matt Wong.
17:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is know his religious stance?--Vojvodae 15:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He now describes himself as an agnostic. Colin MacLaurin (talk) 11:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Seventh-day Adventists

message: On ASCAP, there are songwriting credits under RBF songs for "Matt Brendan Wong" and for "Matthew Yung Sang Wong" -- Ernie and Bert fan (talk) 07:26, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full name?
Talk:Ahmet Yıldız (scientist)

message: I have not been able to verify the foillowing: "Ahmet yıldız who explored the working mechanism of the proteins in human cells, is chosen as the biggest youngest scientist of the year 2005 by the Science Journal. He will take this prize at 18 February." DES (talk) 18:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Refer:  Espresso Addict 01:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Photograph should be added from a source with a free license 
*Needs copy edit and wikification
*Basic biographical information required, including date of birth
*Article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*Information on research should be expanded
*References should be converted to inline format
*External links list could do with pruning (several links duplicate similar information)
Espresso Addict 01:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments

message: There's also Ahmet Yıldız, born 1982, a gay activist (and confusingly also a physics student) who was shot dead one year ago in what has been called Turkey's "first recorded [...] homosexual honour killing"(The Independent). Allegedly his family had him killed. There is a big campaign for bringing his murderers to justice. See Honor killing#Definitions, last para. --87.162.47.103 (talk) 16:05, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig 
Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (people of India and Sri Lanka)

message: Regarding the quoted case, Chandrasekharendra Saraswati Kanchi Mahaswamigal, I'd dispute that he is widely known by this name, which includes the two word title.  He's most commonly referred to as Chandrasekharendra Saraswati. Actually the most common spelling is Chandrasekharendra Saraswathi. Imc 18:08, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of titles

message: Just notifying about an interesting discussion that is taking place at Talk:Ravi Shankar#Disambiguation, and which relates to this guideline proposal. --Francis Schonken 09:13, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: probably merge with Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Indic)--Dangerous-Boy 23:48, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with [[Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Indic)]]
Talk:Mega Man Zex

message: i never started an article, so let's see how this goes...
ok, so i stole a bunch of stuff from the mario basket article because that one looks good enough.  i also included the latest news, the original story with a really good thread going, and the art in case someone finds something they think would be appropriate there.
:Good man. Though, are you sure it's Zex? I've heard Zechs, Zekusu, ZX... - Doug teh H-Nut 18:57, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Capitol, Melbourne

message: It doesn't look all that.
:Yeah, for serious. Ashibaka tock 21:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All that impressive to live up to its claim of the greatest cinema ever built? Not from the outside. You should see the inside though. pfctdayelise 03:56, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A photo of the interior would do the article much more justice. The current photo just shows the apartments built on top. The interior is truly magical. I wonder if we can get something from RMIT? Cnwb 09:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They do public tours on Fridays. I just have to be bothered to show up. :) IDK about this week, I'm planning on going to the tennis a fair bit. pfctdayelise 14:27, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: *Were the apartments built at the same time and were they always intended to be apartments?  It just doesn't look like my idea of a cinema.--A  Y  Arktos 11:30, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Apartments
Talk:Drunken Master II

message: Can we really not find a better source discussing the differences between the US version and the original?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.172.56.71 (talk) 07:04, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Who wrote the plot contained in this article? It barely touches on the plot of the film and completely omits the character names/actors contained within.
Also there is very little, if anything, regarding the fallout between Lau Kar Leung and Jackie Chan, which at the time added a lot of media interest in the film and probably didn't hurt the box office takings in Asia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.206.254 (talk) 16:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot? 

message: "It was Jackie Chan's first traditional style martial arts film since The Young Master (1980)" - was Dragon Lord (1982) not in the traditional style then?  If not, why not? --Cal42 (talk) 08:42, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traditional style? 
Talk:Drunken Master

message: Added the beginnings of a cast section.  Anyone have a more complete cast list? Lordjubatus 04:57, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast

message: The intro to this entry says that "Drunken Master" was Jackie Chan's first big hit.  It was actually his second - "Snake in Eagle's Shadow" was his first, also directed by Yuen Wo Ping and featuring the same cast.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.144.139.116 (talk) 18:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NOT Jackie's first hit film

message: I believe the rapper Hona Costello's mention in this article is insignificant as he doesn't have a particularly known following. In addition, he attempted to make his own wikipedia to gain clout, as well as start incendiary clout via tweeting controversial tweets, made to provoke certain people (such as the star wars fandom, or infamously known, his tweet regarding digital artists) JoeyjojoshabaYOU (talk) 06:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Have removed as there is no source cited here and Hona Costello has been repeatedly deleted at AfD and now salted Cannolis (talk) 11:03, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2023
Talk:The Last Command (1928 film)

message: This is all very confusing. The main character is referred to as General Dolgorucki in the New York Times review, IMDb, TCM and AllRovi, yet a document in the film itself shows that his name is Sergius Alexander, which is also listed in IMDb, TCM and AllRovi. Other characters also have differing names, depending on the source:
*Natalie Dabrova in the Criterion DVD and IMDb, vs. Natascha Dobrowa in TCM and AllRovi
*Leo vs Lev
*the Assistant (Criterion) vs. Assistant Director
*the Bodyguard (Criterion) vs. Serge, the valet
I've seen the Criterion version, and that's what I've used for the names, but maybe the intertitles have been changed from the initial release. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:55, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character names