lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:United States Air Force Judge Advocate General's Corps

message: Article says the Judge Advocate General's Department was renamed Judge Advocate General's Corps in 2003.  How do we change article title?--Smashingworth 04:29, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :I've gone ahead and done it.  Fixed.--Smashingworth 22:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:07, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Stimulism

message: Two new religions in one day?  Wow, that sucks...  but hey, we all have our beliefs.  Just because we can't prove it doesn't mean it can't exist.  I mean, think about it, can we prove christianity?  No.  So, you can't just delete a belief, and expect to host the Christianity religion on wikipedia.  Sorry, but in all honesty, you must admit that part is true.  
You also say I may be the sole practicioner.
Yes. This is a VERY uncommon religion. According to the Master we have, there is me and 5 other people who follow this religion. I am creating this page to try to find the other 5. Please do not delete it quite yet...
*Comment - No one said it didn't exist. Only that it is not notable. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. A religion followed by few people (or one) is not appropriate for an encyclopedia, and Wikipedia gets a lot of them. As soon as someone notices the articles, they tend to go the way this one will. Fan1967 04:57, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Why not leave them?  What if there are people looking for a new outlook on life, and they suddenly see a special ideal that seems right for them?  It might make someone feel happy, and it seems legit.  Sure, it's an encyclopedia, but, where do encyclopedias get their information?  A source.  Where does a source come from?  A biased point of view. All historians have their own point of view, which is why each encyclopedia has a special unique definition.  This is just one of them.
Response Because then Wikipedia would be an indiscriminate collection of information. 'Nuff said. Fan1967 05:10, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No hard and fast rule. The critera are notability and verifiability. Most important would be indications that many thousands have heard of it, that people are reporting on it, and talking about it even if they are not followers. That's notability. You can get away with very few members if they do something that attracts a huge amount of attention, like Heaven's Gate, but I don't think you want to go there. Fan1967 23:04, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  In return
Talk:CIRR-FM

message: Note that this article will be moved to a "CXXX-FM" call sign as soon as the station's C-prefix call sign is known. Bearcat 20:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jang Bogo

message: As the title states, I made some major organizations, making headings for each part of Jang Bogo's life. I thought that this would allow a much clear reading and easy to follow paragraph style. I hope to eventually find and add pictures as well.
Also just added a bit more to the Political Section.
Xelnanga 02:49, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Major Organization/Grammar Changes 
Talk:List of Old Harrovians

message: Hi, I'm rearanging the current list to mke it more sucsinct, adding over 400 as yet unadded alumni in the process and ...afterwards....putting it all in alphabetical order. I would appreciate a reduction in any editing of this page until finnished. This will take around 2 weeks, but will be worth it!,
thanks :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.199.173 (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reconstruction in Process!!!

message: I suggest that Sir Winston Churchill will be mentioned twice. Both as prime minister and as writer. If he isn't considered to be a writer - the opposite could be argued with his Nobel prize in Literature in mind. Victor b04 (talk) 00:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I think that's fair enough. He should be added just after the poet Byron. Xn4 (talk) 18:58, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Churchill 

message: Harrow has produced hundreds of aristocrats, most of whom are more notable for doing other things than merely having inherited titles.  I suggest that if someone is notable for another reason, that we enter them under the relevant section, and if we still have nobles who have actually achieved little else but inheritence of a title, then we can move them to an "Other" section below.--Zoso Jade (talk) 12:23, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nobility section
Talk:American Ballet

message: This company predated New York City Ballet and does not hold enough relation to be a direct predecessor.--tufkaa 04:51, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for creating this page! I have added a seealso to NYCB on the grounds that: 
**American Ballet and Ballet Caravan were founded by City Ballet's selfsame founders, Balanchine and Kerstein;
**they are included in the history of NYCB on their website ; 
**and photos of their productions are displayed in the lobby of the New York State Theatre; 
**City Ballet in any case consider themselves to be their lineal descendants; 
**nor have I read any history of ballet that does not. Robert Greer (talk) 19:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

text: PS If you're going to be at Columbia on Sunday the 16th we can discuss this further. Robert Greer (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NYCB 

message: :Thank you for creating this page! I have added a seealso to NYCB on the grounds that: 
**American Ballet and Ballet Caravan were founded by City Ballet's selfsame founders, Balanchine and Kerstein;
**they are included in the history of NYCB on their website ; 
**and photos of their productions are displayed in the lobby of the New York State Theatre; 
**City Ballet in any case consider themselves to be their lineal descendants; 
**nor have I read any history of ballet that does not. Robert Greer (talk) 19:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: PS If you're going to be at Columbia on Sunday the 16th we can discuss this further. Robert Greer (talk) 19:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Thank you

message: The following appeared at the top of the article: 
: Alma Mater premiere, Saturday, September 28, 1935
— Robert Greer (talk) 21:16, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alma Mater
Talk:Bright Angel Trail

message: In the Competition with Cameron section, I have a citation to provide, but I don't know the formula for adding them. It is the same source for my correction on the year the Kaibab Trail was constructed. It's as follows:
Anderson, Michael F., Living at the Edge: Explorers, Exploiters, and Settlers of the Grand Canyon Region, Grand Canyon Association, 1998, page 107.
Zencowboy27 (talk) 03:49, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation to add 

message: I agree with User:Zencowboy27 that such a famous trail deserves attention.
I've only glanced at the article, but a couple things jumped out at me:
# The info box claims the trail length is 8.1 miles, the table in the main article says 9.3
# The info box lists trailheads as South Rim and Phantom Ranch. I think the 8.1 miles is roughly the distance to River Rest house, not Phantom ranch.
# The cite for the 9.3 mile length is not online. Online sources are not strictly required, but surely there is a n RS with this information. For example: this NPS document which supports 8.0 miles to River Rest House.
# The table supports an elevation change of 4212, but the text refers to 4380. Maybe the termini are different, but that should either be explained or fixed.
# The text says it is 2 miles from trail's end to the Campground, which differs from the NPS claim of 1,5 miles. Which is it?--SPhilbrick(Talk) 20:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues requiring attention 

message: Unfortunately, the English language is inconsistent when it comes to use of "the" in front of proper names. For example, a recent edit was correct to remove "the" in front of "Grand Canyon Village". The same would be true of "Grand Canyon National Park". However, the opposite is true for "the Grand Canyon" and for "the South Rim" (which, by the way, has a different definition than the lower case term "the south rim"). Pretty ugly stuff, eh? I've made a couple of edits to reflect this. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 18:16, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  When to use "the"
Talk:Sanctuary (Utada song)

message: About the reversed part "I need true emotions..." I'm wondering, has anyone gotten any official words about what that part actually say, or has anyone actually listened to the actual words carefully and confirmed it?  I've tried reversing this part and listening to it myself, and what I hear is always "I need two emotions", as in I can't hear an "r" in there at all.  Thanks goes to anyone who has insight into this. -- 72.68.166.89 18:26, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverse part of the lyrics

message: I changed some text in the backwards lyrics section so that it was not as opinionated as the previous version. Janors 22:07, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It means in terms of arrangement.  "Passion" has background vocals (more parts, more complex) and "Sanctuary" doesn't.—ウルタプ 03:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Opinionated

message: Is it "Music inside" or "Music will tie" just wondering? -- 24.205.175.89 04:55, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Music inside," as far as I can tell.  It's pretty tough to understand.  I don't why lyrics are up anyway; there's been no official release. urutapu 05:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I really have no idea.  It might be the B-side track on the next Hikki single, so just wait for now. urutapu 00:53, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well that would really suck if it was only limited to her next single. There shoule be a US Kingdom Hearts 2 Soundtrack Release just like the first one. It does say the US Release on here is "TBA" so maybe that means there will be one. I doubt there won't be one.--InnerRise 02:05, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, yeah, it'll probably be on the English edition of the OST, but a single is more likely to come up before that. urutapu 03:53, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

text: "Simple And Clean" was the B-side track on Hikki's COLORS single, which was a Japanese single (so was "Hikari").  So you'll have to import.  Just so you know, you can buy things from just about every country online...since, you know.  It's online. urutapu 23:53, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't doubt it.  English is considered "trendy" in Japan. urutapu 03:51, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Um...it's about a single song. And sign your comments. urutapu 02:11, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sanctuary ~opening version~ Lyrics

message: Can someone tell me if the mix on that youtube video someone just posted is official or fan-made? (It's…actually pretty good…—urutapu 16:53, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanctuary - PLANITb Remix 

message: I'm changing the page; the article is totally off. The only backwards lyrics in the song are "I need more affection than you know", "So many ups and downs", and "I need true emotions". (BTW, the lyrics have never been OFFICIALLY released as of yet... so some "musical tide" and "I need true emotions" are up for debate.) Yuki Shiido 00:17, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Lyrics
Talk:Articulated tram

message: I've started translating from :de:Straßenbahn-Gelenkwagen as it is far more comprehensive than the automated translation of that article which was put here in the first place. Sections that are not translated have been commented out in the article, but these should be gone fast. --Doco 08:59, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Myrtone has pointed me to this page. I'm strapped for time, so no wholesale translation to expect from me. Maybe I can do some proofreading despite being a native German speaker. What I can do, however, is to contribute photos from articulated trams I photographed in Dresden and Amsterdam.--Klaus with K 15:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rewrite
File talk:Thistleclass.png

message: For another version of the Thistle logo which is much more like Douglass's original drawing, see this: . Mrees1997 05:07, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

message: For crying out loud. 
This is the Thistle Class emblem. The design is included in the bylaws of the Thistle Class Association. See http://www.thistleclass.com/sailing/GBConstitutionandBylawsRev807.pdf
This particular drawing was created by me, Michael Rees, by copying the drawing on one of my Thistle sails. The drawing on the Thistle sails were applied by various sailmakers and were based on a drawing by Sandy Douglass, who designed the Thistle in 1945.
It is the distictive mark of the Thistle class sailboat that is displayed on all Thistle sails in order to readily identify Thistle sailboats. 
In each article in which it is used, its purpose is to show what the emblem looks like to facilitate identification of Thistle sailboats. There is no other way to convey the intended information. The use of the emblem in this way does not harm the trademark or copyright holder, the Thistle Class Association, but rather benefits it. 
It is used in the articles 
Thistle (dinghy) 
Sail Class Markings 
The rationale in case of these two articles is the same, as stated above.
Mrees1997 (talk) 22:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale
Talk:Vertumnus

message: Someone might want to check Ovid's Metamorphoses and bring the Wikipedia telling into closer allignment with Ovid. --Wetman 05:11, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm the one who left the request for a citation for 'only purely Latin tale,' since the phrase is not supported by or discussed as far as I can see in the body text of the article. The meaning of all four words is unclear to me.
Is the distinction meant that all the rest of the Metamorphoses is made up of narratives that come from Greek myths as adapted by Ovid? This isn't exactly true, especially toward the end of the work, where one finds Roman material such as the little passage about Julius Caesar, and about Ovid living in a new Golden Age. See W.R. Johnson, "Vertumnus in Love," Classical Philology 92 (1997) 367–375, reacting against Amy Richlin and her mob, on Ovid on the "Roman destiny" theme. There's also the famous passage connecting Pythagoras to Numa, and if I'm not mistaken the treatment of Greek myth elsewhere, as in the Phaethon episode, draws on elements that reflect Italic versions (or even at moments perhaps Celtic, according to Frederick Ahl).
Since the Barbu Ovidianum has no online preview, I can't check how accurately the source is represented. Is there a distinction being made between "Latin" and "Roman"? So maybe this means "Vertumnus and Pomona" is the only myth retold by Ovid in the Metamorphoses that originates within Italic religious narrative tradition (does "Latin" = "Italic" here)? Except that Roman sources insist on an Etruscan connection, casting "purely" into doubt. So I think all four words are doubtful, if "tale" = "narrative, story". If "tale" means "myth," however, it should say that. It would make sense to me if it said something like "V and P is the only tale in the Metamorphoses that is based on a Roman myth," that is, without a Greek origin. (Though this assumes readers coming to this article know that Ovid retells Greek myths in the Metamorphoses.) So the statement as it stands may sound "simple," but it is not usefully accurate. Cynwolfe (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the quote from the source article to the long footnote. Ambiguities do remain, as Cynwolfe notes.--Wetman (talk) 17:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'only purely Latin tale' 
Talk:Colorado Trail

message: Needs maps.
Ocdcntx (talk) 19:45, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs maps 

message: This non-profit doesn't seem to independently meet our non-profit notability guideline. There isn't much coverage of the foundation's activities other than listings that it exists. Any content worth keeping should be merged into the article on the trail that they maintain. Eddie891  Talk Work  21:17, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 13:47, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Colorado Trail Foundation]] into [[Colorado Trail]]
Talk:Silvina Ocampo

message: Two of her books are described in Spanish as anthologies of relatos. Since that can variously mean memoir-like stories, thoughtful reportage, or even certain types of narrative essays, and I don't know the works, I've hesitated to translate. If someone knows the works, please feel free to use the appropriate English word. - Jmabel | Talk 05:26, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Relatos''
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Peer review/Tikal the Echidna

message: This article sticks to the subject, has enough information, references, notes, and externals links, and has enough pictures.  It is stable right now, as well.  So is it ready to become a good article, an example article, or a featured article? --71.104.182.53 05:29, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Tikal the Echidna]]
Talk:Coraciiformes

message: I think the info in the article is WRONG. Alcedinidae, Brachypteraciidae, Cerylidae, Coraciidae, Halcyonidae, Meropidae, Momotidae, Phoeniculidae, Todidae, Upupidae families belong to order Coraciae not Coraciiformes. Coraciiformes is an order which includes suborders Striges, Caprimulgi, Cypseli, Colii, Trogones, Piciformes and this article Coraciae. Source     —Preceding unsigned comment added by Obuli (talk • contribs) 02:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All those links cite sources that are over 80 years old! Taxonomy has moved on slightly since then. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 02:48, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, my initial source was Dictionary of Biology Terms, 1998 published by  Turkish Language Association. For a source in English language, they were the first ones I got in google. You mean there is no order as "Coraciae" anymore? I do not think so.Obuli (talk) 03:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Coraciae" existed in 80s Sibley-Ahlquist_taxonomy#Coraciae but it seems it is still present Obuli (talk) 03:12, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Data

message: I rerated as C (was tossing up between C and Start). Covers evolution likely, but needs info on ecology/characteristics etc. Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rerated as C

message: The Template:Taxonomy/Coraciiformes page which drives the Template:Automatic_taxobox uses a taxonomy that directly contradicts the taxonomy in the article by placing Coraciiformes in Passerimorphae. As far as I can see the taxonomy in the article is more current. I've understood the technical details now, and know technically what to do to correct it, but am at a loss how the taxonomy behind the automatic taxoboxes is meant to be maintained. I haven't found anything documented. Should I correct Template:Taxonomy/Coraciiformes as I see fit whenever I stumble over a contradiction to the article? Should I worry about keeping things consistent, and also correct all the other Template:Taxonomy/stuff that use the same out-of-date source? Or should I not worry at all, and leave the Template:Taxonomy to some deep experts which will correct things as they see fit? Stupid girl (talk) 13:43, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Automatic taxobox shows Passerimorphae as parent taxon
Talk:The Johns Hopkins News-Letter

message: In this past year, the JHU News-Letter has received considerable coverage from Jezebel.com re: sexist newspaper articles, including one comparing fat women to "wildebeests" and "livestock," another glamorizing date rape, etc.  Is this newsworthy to include?  It has sparked a great deal of discussion and coverage on campus.  205.215.249.225 (talk) 01:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent controversies 
Talk:Pulitzer Prize for Breaking News Photography

message: Would it be possible for someone to please try and get a link to a lot of these pictures. I am doing a report and I come here a lot, however I have a lot of trouble finding these pictures. Thank you.
--Steven91 05:51, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, but I hope you turned in your report before now. --Bkkbrad 00:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: Wouldn't it make more sense to merge this page with that of Pulitzer Prize for Spot News Photography?--Seventy-one 08:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. --P64 (talk) 18:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Many of the links to the images do not work any more.  It seems that the Pulitzer website has been rearranged so that the links no longer work.  Can these links be updated, please? --Viennese Waltz 11:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to images
Talk:Mom and Dad Save the World

message: Not sure if this [edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mom_and_Dad_Save_the_World&oldid=156730451] is subtle vandalism or correct.. Anyone confirm whether it was "wife" or just "make her his".. That IP user's been altering small things all over the place.. NathanLee 06:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that is a true statement.  He wanted the full wedding and everything.  He's the villain of the film so no sympathy to his motivation.   To be sure of it yourself you can attempt to watch the film. Maxcardun (talk) 11:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible vandalism
Talk:Tatsuya Yoshida

message: * Ruins
* Koenji Hyakkei
* YBO2
* Vasilisk
* Sanhedolin
* Korekyojin
* Tairikuotoko Vs. Sanmyakuonna
* Fujii Satoko Quartet
* Knead
* Daisanmyaku-X
* Musica Transonic
* Seikazoku
* Akaten
* Jun Togawa Band
* Ruinzhatova
* Zubi Zuva
* Acid Mothers Gong
* Ronruins
* Daimonji
* Cicala Mvta
* Magaibatsu
* Sun Kich
* Zamla Mammas Manna
* Pain Killer
* Tohkichi
* Kikuchi Masabumi Slash Trio 
Um, thanks a BILLION for the awesome list. Dude is AMAZING at drums. No one can touch him. Gatesofawesome!
Np. he terminates everybody. Borkorg 06:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Casualties of the Argentine air attacks at Bluff Cove

message: I would like to make a note here. I created this article, fully aware that it is not a neutral POV because the Argentine airmen killed in the engagement are not mentioned. However, a friend of mine has borrowed a book with the names of these pilots in, and when he returns it (hopefully in early May), I will add their names to this page. If anyone knows the names themselves, and wants to supply them, then be my guest, but please don't yell at me for bias, or delete the page until I have all the evidence I want to put down here. (i will also site the book). Thanks--Jackyd101 06:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You could instead call it "British casualties of the Battle of Bluff Cove", and I don't the event is really referred to as the "Battle of Bluff Cove", perhaps "Argentine air attacks at Bluff Cove" would be better. Ryan4314  (talk) 20:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

message: Of course, Bluff Cove disaster didn't happened at San Carlos, and of course it was June 8, not May 24 (though Sir Galahad really was damaged on 24th at San Carlos). 195.248.189.182 12:21, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake