lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Blue Grass Army Depot

message: Good info for inclusion in the article; however, keep in mind that Wikipedia is not just an alternative for unit/agency webpages.  
Section added by Don'tKnowItAtAll (talk) 13:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanded info

message: Contact info is not appropriate for the main, encyclopedic article.  However, it is listed here:
Blue Grass Army Depot, ATTN: SJMBG-CO, 2901 Kingston Highway, Richmond, Ky. 40475-
5001, Phone: (859) 779-6221, E-mail:  joadail.stephenson@us.army.mil
Information provided by the Joint Munitions Command
Section added by Don'tKnowItAtAll (talk) 13:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contact Information

message: Source: <http://www.richmondregister.com/news/local_news/article_df1090f5-5270-5a62-98dd-fbb508831e2e.html?mode=jqm>
I was thinking about adding something like this to the History section:
Subheading: USAF Operations
Text: From 1963 to 1994, BGAD was home to Detatchment 8 of the Strategic Air Command's 1st Combat Group[footnote to source link]. Detatchment 8 operated multiple radar installations at BGAD, including a copy of a Soviet radar set captured by the Israeli Defense Forces during the Six-Day War in 1967. Various SAC units (primarily B-52 heavy bombers) conducted regular training runs over BGAD to practice and/or test various radar jamming and evasion techniques.
Any problem with this addition?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wesmorgan1 (talk • contribs) 19:08, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any reason not to add a section about the Depot's use by the Strategic Air Command? 
Talk:Gibson Moderne

message: This article needs an introduction.  As it stands, it jumps right in to background.  I am aware of being Bold, but don't know the best way to format an intro. Hezekiah957 05:37, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: I inserted a short bit about Scorpions lead guitarist Matthias Jabs owning a Moderne.  I have the tour book in question, and he is pictured with one.  However, I don't know how to cite an almost-30-year-old tour book!Dyscard (talk) 07:30, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That’s a 1981 model, not from the 1950s 47.16.147.19 (talk) 05:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matthias Jabs
Talk:Gibson Melody Maker

message: The current infobox shows information regarding the current Les Paul Melody Maker, and is not correct for the original Melody Maker.  I do not have the correct information to add, nor do I know when the current LPMM was introduced.
Should I copy the current infobox to the Les Paul Melody Maker section and modify both, putting question signs where I don't know the correct information? Respectfully, SamBlob 19:14, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found some information at http://www.gibson.com/Files/downloads/bluebook/GibsonElectrics.pdf and set up and added a Melody Maker infobox based on that.  I also moved the Les Paul Melody Maker infobox to the Les Paul Melody Maker section.  I still don't know when the LPMM was launched, though. Respectfully, SamBlob 19:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The current infobox is for the Les Paul Melody Maker 
Talk:Phallus in Wonderland

message: http://imdb.com/title/tt0216794/ should be added...
:—Hobart 13:53, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gibson Les Paul Swamp Ash Studio

message: Isn't this a submodel of a submodel?
There is an article about the Gibson Les Paul Studio.  Perhaps this should be merged into that? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SamBlob (talk • contribs) 15:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I forgot to sign this.  Sorry about that. Respectfully, SamBlob 16:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with "Gibson Les Paul Studio"?
Talk:PSG College of Technology

message: The alumni of Anna University and PSG College of Technology are same, Somebody please clarify.--Citsamraj (talk) 10:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable alumni

message: Can't anyone make this article better? It has no info box and the whole text looks like it has been hurriedly jacked of from a college brochure.
Southernstar (talk) 13:42, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: It's like a Brochure

message: Never merge both of them. I being a student of both colleges. I strongily disagree on merging PSG College of Arts and Science (PSG CAS) with PSG Tech. Both of them have different synergies and different college cultures. Guru 11:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Never Merge 

message: The Both institutions having completely different Systems, Culture, student life, fests, and sports.. Don Merge both  : C.Karthikeyan PSG Tech—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.163.146.4 (talk) 04:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don Merge 

message: The article on PSG College of Technology  can be much better with nice photographs of 'N' Block and 'A' Block and teh Auditoriums,rather than having snapshots of cultural shows.
G27 11:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can be better
Talk:Yuma Proving Ground

message: I was under the apparently-mistaken impression that the military exists to enable things like urban environments.  It is therefor impossible for an urban environment to encroach on a military installation.  
What is actually meant here, and can someone say that instead please? 73.170.203.143 (talk) 18:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  urban "encroachment"? 

message: Cold Regions Test Center and Tropic Regions Test Centers should be in proving grounds not Yuma Proving Ground.  Yuma is the desert and has nothing to do with the tropics or cold regions. Going to go remove the sections. Someone can put them in the correct article if they want but this isn't the right place.73.170.203.143 (talk) 23:30, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The Yuma Test Center does the desert testing. Yuma Proving Grounds controls three different test centers, Yuma Test Center, Cold Regions Test Center, and the Tropic Regions Test Center. If this article was just about the Yuma Test Center then okay, but it's not for it's about the Yuma Proving Grounds who command headquarters happens to be at the Yuma Test Center. --McChizzle (talk) 00:29, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  sections in wrong article
Talk:Guam Army National Guard

message: Is it really necessary to write that "Guam Army National Guard (GU ARNG) is the Army National Guard of Guam which, together with the Guam Air National Guard, comprises the Guam National Guard"?122.59.212.133 (talk) 06:51, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circumlocution and redundancy
Talk:372nd Military Police Company (United States)

message: 207.255.63.139 seems to have changed the content of the article to reflect his/her own personal opinion. Please, an admin needs to look out for this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariabrenna (talk • contribs) 05:09, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversial Content Changes Supporting Personal Opinions

message: Work in progress need some more info and better references...William.Richards (talk) 15:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Unit Awards

message: While the summary at top addresses the abuse briefly, very few details about the abuse or the fates of the members of the MP Company exist in the rest of the article. I am not as familiar as I would like to be about the subject to write this myself, but I can if needed. I lack the time to do so at the moment. Any takers? -- Srwalden (talk) 11:59, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Section on Abu Ghraib Abuse By Company Members

message: In the section regarding Unit History there is a sentence that reads, "The unit has participated in Operation Dragoon in France, Operation Nordwind." This is confusing me, is it a mistake? Eschocat (talk) 02:43, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing Sentencing in Unit History Section
Talk:1st Battalion, 24th Infantry Regiment

message: I've removed the following:
*a news article from the The News Tribune (Tacoma, Washington) that was copy and pasted word for word (here)
*pics of the unit in action that the uploader claims that they own the copyright to, which are suspect
--BrokenSphereMsg me 18:06, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Overhaul

message: This article has been merged into 24th Infantry Regiment (United States). -SSG Cornelius Seon (US Army, Retired) (talk) 23:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Articles Merged
Talk:Pine Bluff Arsenal

message: "to the warfighter and homeland defender"
Pure weasel words.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.127.170.170 (talk) 04:20, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel Words

message: Good expansion, Jbarati.  However, keep in mind that this is an encyclopedic article, not just an alternate webpage.  The information you deleted is relevant even if not fully cited.  Can you provide some of the citations that are missing?  I served there, building the Binary Facilities in the late 80s; I just don't have a reference.   
Also, how can PBA have received a Homeland Security mission prior to the establishment of the Dpeartment of Homeland Security?  
Section added by Don'tKnowItAtAll (talk) 13:05, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanded Article

message: Pine Bluff Arsenal, 10020 Kabich Circle, Pine Bluff, Ark. 71602-9500, Phone: (870) 540-3420, E-mail: webmaster@pba.army.mil
Section added by Don'tKnowItAtAll (talk) 13:05, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contact info for Pine Bluff Arsenal
Talk:Wajid Ali Shah

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: while it's clear that this article needs work, the inclusion of the (partially unsourced) information about his wives in the intro header rather than in the biography section seems odd. 1. the unsourced statement about nikahi wives seems to have been unsourced for long enough to justify it's removal and 2. shouldn't statements about this be under a subsequent section? I was under the impression that the header was supposed to be a concise summation of the article's content. Evansknight (talk) 14:56, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information placement
Talk:Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory

message: I intend to expand this article, primarily using references from the research output of CRREL staff and the general framework of CRREL's official history. User:HopsonRoad 00:49, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I will be expanding the history of the Second 25 years more slowly, since there is no one-stop source. I'm starting with a bare-bones introduction. User:HopsonRoad 13:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: I've removed the following items from the article, as I found it:
* Mention of facilities in Alaska and Vermont. There have been such facilities (at Fort Wainwright, AK and Danville, Vermont), but they are not mentioned in CRREL's website.
* The claim that "The Hanover facility has been designated as a Superfund cleanup site by the Environmental Protection Agency due to elevated subsurface soil concentrations of trichloroethylene and other contaminants." CRREL is not listed in NH Superfund sites at http://www.epa.gov/region01/superfund/. There were elevated subsurface concentrations of TCE, subject to treatment by a specialized facility, but this was probably funded through direct Army appropriations, not the EPA. Mention would require a correct reference. — Reintroduced TCE topic with proper citations and NPOV(User:HopsonRoad 15:58, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the matter of Alaska facilities has been answered. A better citation is needed for the Anchorage office. User:HopsonRoad 13:04, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of questionable entries 

message: I'd like to find open-source information on the following to round out the article:
* An aerial image of CRREL’s facilities. 
* Images that exemplify CRREL’s recent activities — Implemented. (User:HopsonRoad 15:58, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further information sought 
Talk:South Dakota v. Opperman

message: There is an important footnote to this case. On remand/rehearing, the South Dakota Supreme Court found that the Fourth Amendment equivalent in the state constitution was more protective than the federal constitution. State v. Opperman, 247 NW2d 673 (SD 1976). This holding came despite the fact that the argument first arose after the remand and the petition for rehearing was not timely filed.
--67.158.26.78 (talk) 15:37, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Collyweston

message: I did some searching, a few years ago, on the origin of the term 'colleyweston' as a metaphor. I had a recollection of an explanation but couldn't find the original source. If anyone is interested, or can add to it, the details were placed in an endnote at: Colleyweston metaphor. TonyP (talk) 10:22, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible explanation of metaphor
Talk:Gibson Explorer

message: The Gibson X-plorer is the new, proper name... that info should be changed.
WHOEVER changed it back, look at the official Gibson page. They call it the X-plorer!
Jeeze.
24.86.144.101 23:21, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: X-Plorer

message: I don't approve of the fact that the main page continues to call it the "Explorer" and that the X-plorer page redirects here. The new name should be acknowledged as the proper one. At the very least it should be referred to as the "X-plorer" throughout the article.24.86.144.101 09:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article name is fine as it reflects the historical(and still official) name of the model. It mentions that it is marketed as X-plorer(a stupid name BTW) and that it is also marketed as Explorer Pro. It has never been officially re-badged by Gibson. Gibson, for some reason, has simply decided to market to dimwits by using the "X" brand as part of their X-Factor series. The article is fine the way it is. 156.34.142.110 12:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: It's not appropriate I think to narrowly specify the pickup models used on *current production* Explorers, since the article covers the model generally.  The original '58s had two PAFs (both the same, there was no neck/bridge distiction.) The '76s had dual T-buckers, again both the same.  What can be said of the Explorer is that it has always had two humbuckers. It has not always had a 498 and a 500.Solicitr (talk) 21:29, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pickups
Talk:Gibson EDS-1275

message: In the first paragraph of this article it says this model is still in production.
Later on, in paragraph 3 - "Current Model" it says it is discontinued.
I don't know enought to tell which is true, but they can't both be true.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgeIIIFan (talk • contribs) 20:01, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currently in production or discontinued? 

message: One of the handful of guitars given specific screen time in Stranger than Fiction (2006 film). Weeb Dingle (talk) 19:56, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  film appearance 

message: "Gibson's first doubleneck guitars were produced from 1958 to 1961 with a hollow body and two 6-string necks, one being a short-scale neck tuned to a higher octave; from 1962 to 1967 it had a solid body. A model with a 4-string bass and a 6-string guitar neck was called the EBS-1250". So Gibson made doublenecks with two six string necks and also with bass and guitar necks. But what about the EDS-1275? From the picture it appears to have 12 string and a 6 string necks but nowhere in the article does it explicitly say so. A rather glaring omission.
130.246.57.110 (talk) 15:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glaring omission 

message: Attempted edit, which was reverted by an administrator who advised me to post on the talk page about this.
I believe this model is relevant enough to be added to the article, as it's a direct competitor to the Harley Benton model already listed here; both are budget modern reproductions of the EDS-1275 produced by in-house brands tied to online music stores. 
Text copied here for clarity; 
=== Gear4music ===
Gear4music (a British online music equipment retailer) produces a line of in-house double neck guitars including the "Brooklyn Double Neck Guitar", a budget modern reproduction of the EDS-1275. This model features the same 6/12 neck configuration and 22 frets as the EDS-1275, with a cherry finish.
Citation: https://www.gear4music.com/Guitar-and-Bass/Brooklyn-Double-Neck-Guitar-by-Gear4music/1SUM
BraveDude8 (talk) 21:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding additional entry to "Similar models" section 

message: Gear4music (a British online music equipment retailer) produces a line of in-house double neck guitars including the "Brooklyn Double Neck Guitar", a budget modern reproduction of the EDS-1275. This model features the same 6/12 neck configuration and 22 frets as the EDS-1275, with a cherry finish.
Citation: https://www.gear4music.com/Guitar-and-Bass/Brooklyn-Double-Neck-Guitar-by-Gear4music/1SUM
BraveDude8 (talk) 21:03, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gear4music
Talk:Gibson ES-175

message: I have been rewriting many of the ES articles. I notice this one is largely unreferenced and does not have the correct inline citations. I think TNT might be in order. Lightburst (talk) 03:38, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Lightburst (talk) 21:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Corps Support Group

message: I removed this PROD because the rationale was subjective and unrelated to any WP Policy or Guideline.  This is not the best of articles, nor is it properly referenced.  That said, its been around since 2006 and I doubt that notability is an issue.  Indeed this article needs improvement, but should get the scrutiny of an AfD before its deleted.--Mike Cline (talk) 23:56, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed PROD
Talk:Camp Eggers

message: Shouldn't be listed under USMC bases. Never operated by USMC BuzzLightyearWi (talk) 15:24, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I couldn't find any category in the article saying that. However the base hosted Combined Security Transition Command – Afghanistan and Combined Joint Task Force 180 so it was possbile that USMC personnel were based there. Gavbadger (talk) 17:26, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove from USMC Oversea Base List
Talk:Gibson Byrdland

message: Probably the most unhelpful environmnet I've ever encountered, I'm out of here.RogerGLewis (talk) 19:13, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Bye! Respectfully, SamBlob (talk) 21:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  It really isn't worth the effort 

message: Like, ..."he was the first guitarist to use this modification on a guitar" might be factual, but lack of authority gives it the appearance of urban myth. But how is this relevant to Gibson Byrdland? Are ALL known end-user modifications to a Byrdland to be included here?
With that in mind, I've removed and as a result, it has become part of his signature sound. Nugent gives his Byrdlands, and other Gibsons, a custom touch by removing the stock pickup selector switch knobs and installing Gretsch strap lock knobs which belongs in an article actually about The Nooje rather than a guitar he merely happens to own. Weeb Dingle (talk) 17:33, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: unsourced nonsense remains
Talk:Gibson Blueshawk

message: There should be a separate article about the "Gibson Little Lucille" too. This one should be about the "Gibson Blueshawk" only. --Popmuseum (talk) 17:31, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Popmuseum (talk) 13:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gibson "Little Lucille"
Talk:United States Army Aviation and Missile Center

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.amrdec.army.mil/amrdec/history.html and https://www.amrdec.army.mil/amrdec/about-us.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:07, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Although these pages are in the .mil domain, they carry a clear copyright notice "© AMRDEC 2016. All Rights Reserved." Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:07, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Brownie (guitar)

message: 90% of the info on the guitar was blanked without reason and by an anonymous IP who has no previous edits, I'll assume it's vandalism and will re-add all the info previously there, if there is any objection to this or reason for the blanking please tell me, thank you. - Patman2648 07:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

message: In the first line it says 'to a Fender Stratocaster'. I think it would be a good idea to change this to, either, 'given to a Fender Stratocaster', or, 'of a Fender Stratocaster'. Could this be changed if it is deemed suitable by an administrator. Thankyou.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.125.244.244 (talk) 20:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammatical preference.
Talk:Wayne A. Downing

message: The General's date of death in this Wiki article is July 18, however, the referenced "In Memoriam" article on MSNBC (for whom the General worked) was posted Tuesday, July 17, 2007 6:16 PM.  Can anyone clear this up? AndrewAllen 01:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This date was provided to us by a family spokesperson via our WP:OTRS system. (Ticket #2007071810015391). It is also the date used in the Army Times. --Versageek 01:53, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Death

message: This article has been classified as a stub. It needs more details about his life and career. Capitalistroadster 23:40, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification