Talk:Some Girls

message: Why are there two versions of the same cover all of a sudden? Some Girls has two covers and both should be represented. Stan weller 00:58, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Can we get the censored cover, please? AmericanLeMans (talk) 20:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There are three different versions, actually. The third and final version of the album art did away with the die-cuts and replaced the Stones' drag-queen likenesses with hand-drawn women, drawn to look as real as possible. It was this version of the album art that had been used on the CBS-era issues on LP, cassette and CD, but I wonder if it had been used by Atlantic Records since about 1979-1980??? WikiPro1981X (talk) 17:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Covers

message: :Image:SomeGirls78.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:00, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:SomeGirls78.jpg

message: :Image:Some girls.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Some girls.jpg

message: Choice of verbs is especially a problem.  For example, saying Mick claims to be influenced by disco makes me laugh every time I read it.  Obviously, there's disco on the album.  Is the article challenging whether Mick knows what disco is?  Whether he was really influenced by it?  Whether it was someone else (not Mick) who was really influenced?  This kind of thing goes on throughout articles on the Stones.  Mick has said he was influenced by disco (in more than one printed source).  So, why not just use simple, factual language.  Mick says...
Passive voice in first paragraph could be made active, especially as the album sold quite well (IIRC), and still sells.  So it was a highlight.  Maybe it's the word "output" or something.  At any rate, needs to be strengthened. If no objections, I'll put this on my to do list.--69.108.136.43 (talk) 19:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs clean up 

message: Or anyone! Idolizing bands was antithetical to what punk rock was about. Mick Jagger was seen as a show-biz celebrity, at least by the Sex Pistols and their friends (source: PUNK magazine). What did the Clash sing: "No Elvis, Beatles or Rolling Stones in 1977". Adding citation needed tags for now.Smitse (talk) 06:08, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punks, in 1977, didn't "idolize" the Rolling Stones 

message: I took the following section out as it appears controversial and largely WP:OR. When it has references it can maybe be included again. Karst (talk) 10:58, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I added some references but left out the SNL bit since that seems more of pop culture reference. Piriczki (talk) 13:30, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miss You controversy 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Some Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160126084927/http://infodisc.fr/Album_R.php to http://infodisc.fr/Album_R.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160126084927/http://infodisc.fr/Album_R.php to http://infodisc.fr/Album_R.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091029184143/http://www.austriancharts.at:80/1978_album.asp to http://austriancharts.at/1978_album.asp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://chartheaven.9.forumer.com/a/complete-uk-yearend-album-charts_post21.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/charts/archivesearch/article_display/855508?imw=Y
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:24, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Some Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101205133123/http://www.uncut.co.uk/music/the_rolling_stones/reviews/13146 to http://www.uncut.co.uk/music/the_rolling_stones/reviews/13146
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://austriancharts.at/1978_album.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130711073702/http://www.infodisc.fr/B-CD_1978.php to http://www.infodisc.fr/B-CD_1978.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140424232250/http://www.infodisc.fr/CDCertif_O.php?debut=2333 to http://www.infodisc.fr/CDCertif_O.php?debut=2333
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Some Girls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6AGXaMvi4?url=http://www.officialcharts.com/archive-chart/_/3/2011-12-03/ to http://www.theofficialcharts.com/archive-chart/_/3/2011-12-03/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified