Talk:Parliament of Romania

message: Why is "National Representation" capitalized? Is there some particular significance to this? - Jmabel | Talk 19:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: National Representation

message: This page has been vandalised at many places with obnoxious and silly swearwords. So I have put the unencyclopedic tag. Cygnus_hansa 03:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalised 

message: I urge whoever insistently modifies the article to include the referendum stop this, as this referendum has no bearing whatsoever on the current state of affairs, the Constitution of Romania still mentioning two chambers. When a referendum calling for the modification of the Constitution is called for and accepted, only then may the article include phrases like "the parliament will become a unicameral body starting next election". Until then, there is no valid source! sfaefaol 15:02, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009 referendum for unicameral parliament 

message: An image used in this article, File:OlteanuBogdan.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:23, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:OlteanuBogdan.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Mihail Sadoveanu.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Constantin Pirvulescu.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Why are a significant number of parties with a significant number of seats all grouped together and hidden in the 'non-affiliated' section (FD, REPER etc)? Even if they aren't part of the official governing alliance or coalition, surely they should be listed, albeit separately? This naturally includes the pages for the Chamber of Deputies and Senate.
Jacsam2 (talk) 13:06, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large parties in the 'non-affiliated' political groups section