Talk:Walt Kelly

message: It says here he had a wife. It says in the discussion on Pogo that he modeled the female skunk on his mistress. There's nothing here about his personal life. What was his personal life?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.190.42.57 (talk) 05:34, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:   What about the wife and the mistress?

message: This is a copy a post I have placed at User talk:64.236.243.16, concerning issues that have been raised on this page since 2007:
:To whoever involved with this IP address blanket-reverted Walt Kelly with the uncivil edit summary "Prev. edits added nothing but smug condescension in place of scholarship. Pompous tagging removed," the version to which you reverted violated a number of Wikipedia policy and guidelines.
:Foremost, they violated the core policy of verification, being filled with uncited and often POV claims. 
:They were written in an appropriately conversational, essay-like fashion that violates tone guidelines. Whole paragraphs of tribute-like trivia violated guidelines at "What Wikipdia is not". There was overuse of copyrighted images, which violate Wikipedia standards of acceptable fair use. And the blanket reversion of edits that were keeping with concerned discussion on the article's talk page smack of WP:OWN.
:If the person making these edits, which violate numerous Wikipedia policies and guidelines, wishes to make constructive contributions to this encyclopedia, I would urge him or her to register and to take responsibility for his or her edits rather than lurking as an anon IP. If such disallowed edits are restored, an admin will be asked to intervene and protect the article. I am placing this same post on the Walt Kelly talk page, where any further discussion on this topic should continue. 
--Tenebrae (talk) 02:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Policy/guideline violations by 64.236.243.16

message: I removed the reference to his doing the comic book adaptation of Snow White. He did the cover for the 1944 edition of the comic (timed for the first reissue), but the content is just another reprint of the 1937 comic strip adaptation. My expert regarding this, David Gerstein, notes Kelly did pencil the 1944 "Donald Duck and the Seven Dwarfs" in Walt Disney's Comics and Stories #43 (also timed to the first reissue), but it is in no sense an adaptation of the film.  Dgabbard (talk) 17:55, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds about right. Also, I added a header for this comment, since it's a different topic. Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 07:40, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removes attribution of Snow White comic to Kelly

message: It says he preferred Ike to Stevenson, and Truman to Dewey. There's no source cited for any of this. It may very well be true, but how about some attribution?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.131.142.97 (talk) 06:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Political Views

message: In Michael Chabon's "The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay, brief mention is made of Kelly testifying at a senate hearing on the deleterious effects of comic books on American youth.  Is there factual basis to this scene?  Does it bear mentioning on this page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.227.162.205 (talk) 13:27, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he testified at the 1954 Senate Subcommittee Hearings into Juvenile Delinquency, with the special focus on Comic Books. Here is a transcript. Maybe a link should be added to the testimony? http://www.thecomicbooks.com/kelly.html Dgabbard (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Senate Hearing?

message: An image used in this article, File:Pogo - Earth Day 1971 poster.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 9 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Pogo - Earth Day 1971 poster.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An opossum named Pogo appeared in "Albert Takes the Cake," the first issue of Animal Comics, published in 1941 (not 1943). Musanim (talk) 00:14, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: First Appearance of Pogo Character

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Walt Kelly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150613194937/http://www.comic-con.org/awards/2015-eisner-award-nominations to http://www.comic-con.org/awards/2015-eisner-award-nominations
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071113095858/http://www.hahnlibrary.net/comics/awards/reubensum.shtml to http://www.hahnlibrary.net/comics/awards/reubensum.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The manual of style says that in cases of extremely common nicknames we do not need to give them, and we do not need to explain them. Since the title is the shortened name, we can just give the full name in the opening and do not need to explain it at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making intro match the manual of style 

message: For people who are best known by a pseudonym, the legal name should usually appear first in the article, followed closely by the pseudonym. Follow this practice even if the article itself is titled with the pseudonym:
* 
Investigation in reliable sources may be needed to determine whether a subject known usually by a pseudonym has actually changed their legal name to match (e.g., Reginald Kenneth Dwight formally changed his name to Elton Hercules John early in his musical career). Where this is not the case, and where the subject uses a popular form of their name in everyday life, then care must be taken to avoid implying that a person who does not generally use all their forenames or who uses a familiar form has actually changed their name. Do not write, for example:
* . 
It is not always necessary to spell out why the article title and lead paragraph give a different name. If a person has a common English-language hypocorism (diminutive or abbreviation) used in lieu of a given name, it is  presented between quotation marks or parentheses within or after their name. Example:
* Use: 
* Avoid: 
For any kind of alternative name, use formulations like the following (as applicable):
* 
* 
* 
If a person is known by a nickname used in lieu of or in addition to a given name, and it is not a common hypocorism of one of their names, or a professional alias, it is usually presented between double quotation marks following the last given name or initial. The quotation marks are not put in lead-section boldface. Example:
* From Bunny Berigan: .
* From Tina Fey: .
A nickname can eventually become a professional alias, even the most common name for a person. Such a case loses the quotation marks, other than in the subject's lead section if introducing the nickname in mid-name. If the nickname is dominant (in general or in a particular context) it can often be used in other articles without further elaboration. Example:
* From Magic Johnson: 
In the article (and in other articles) use: . Dr. Ruth and Dr. Drew  are trademarks; though they originated as informal nicknames, they do not require quotation marks.
If a nickname is used in place of the subject's entire name, it is usually given separately:
* .
A leading "the" is not capitalized in a nickname, pseudonym, or other alias (except when the alias begins a sentence):
* Use: ; or: 
* Avoid: ; and: 
Nicknames should not be re-presented with additional name parts unless necessary for usage clarity.
* Use: ; or: 
* Avoid: 
Common nicknames, aliases, and variants are usually given in boldface in the lead, especially if they redirect to the article, or are found on a disambiguation page or hatnote and link from those other names to the article. Boldface is not needed for obscure ones or a long list, and those that are not well known to our readers may not need to be in the lead at all.
* Use: 
* Avoid: Excessive foreign language details can make the lead sentence difficult to understand.
* Use: 
* Avoid: The various nicknames are mostly how other mobsters—not so much the reliable sources—referred to Joey Aiuppa, and only two of them were widely reported, the rest being minor variants.
Nicknames and other aliases included must be frequently used by reliable sources in reference to the subject. For example, a sports journalist's one-off reference to a player as "" in purple prose does not constitute a nickname, and treating it as one is original research. Highlighting uncommon or disputed appellations in the lead section gives them undue weight, and may also be a more general neutrality problem if the phrase is laudatory or critical. Example: "Tricky Dick" does not appear in the lead of Richard Nixon; this label by his political opponents is covered, with context, in the article body. Nicknames that are sourceable but not generally known to the public (e.g., a childhood nickname, a hypocorism only used in private life, or a term of spousal endearment revealed in an in-depth biographical book) are not encyclopedic.
Do not cram multiple hypocorisms and nicknames into the name in the lead sentence; complicated naming should be explained separately.
* Poor, confusing example: 
* Clear rewrite:  (The article title is Emory Sparrow, already establishing that as the common, primary name.)
-If Bill Gates should be listed as William Thomas Gates with no need to explain the nickname in the opening, I feel the same applies to Walt Kelly.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:10, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: <span class="anchor" id="PSEUDONYM"></span><span class="anchor" id="HYPOCORISM"></span><span class="anchor" id="LEGALNAME"></span><span class="anchor" id="NICKNAME"></span><span class="anchor" id="QUOTENAME"></span><span class="anchor" id="Pseudonyms"></span> Pseudonyms, stage names, nicknames, hypocorisms, and common names