lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Watson Island (Miami)

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail:  
Article is a good start, probably even a stub, but I cannot pass it as a Good article. The current public facilities section reads pretty much like a list of the major attractions of the island, with inline citations, but the inline citations mostly point to the item's description on the City of Miami website.
The one photo included in the article is a low-quality arial view of the island from the NOAA, and doesn't really help the reader get a grasp of what the island has to offer or its significance.  The current public facilities section can be expanded with further prose and additional photographs to add to the readability and content of the article. You might want to post a request at Wikipedia:Requested pictures for some locals to take photos of the attractions and facilities present on the island.
The article briefly mentions some historical information in the lead, and this could be expanded into a separate history section with details on the island's historical and economical significance. the lead section should summarize the article, which it currently does not.
I am not sure what the purpose of the 'source' section at the very end is for? It contains one external link to an article in the South Florida Business Journal. The information in that article could be used to contribute to the content of this article.
I would recommend reviewing WP:CITE for information on formatting and including inline citations, as well as WP:WIAGA for information on the good article criteria. Hope this review helps! Dr. Cash 07:01, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article review
Talk:Justin Trudeau

message: i see them listed in various parts of other sections, but can we add a section just for them or a master link that lists them out instead or also? Dennizenx (talk) 14:54, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Should not be a section but incorporated into the article as a whole WP:STRUCTURE as is done here. "Segregation of text or other content into different regions or subsections, based solely on the apparent POV of the content itself, may result in an unencyclopedic structure". Pls review WP:CSECTION. Moxy- 15:11, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  SCANDALS 

message: This section needs to be updated with the new federal court ruling that states it was unreasonable and infringed on Charter rights. https://www.cbc.ca/amp/1.7124513 2001:1970:4AE5:A300:A165:9205:D5AB:D32A (talk) 13:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: A bit surprised it hadn't been added yet, so I've added it in. ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!  13:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emergencies act
Talk:Marthe Hanau

message: No sources, unref tag added. Left request on User Talk:Skysmith page.--FloNight 22:39, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs references

message: According to the French Wikipedia https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marthe_Hanau, Marthe Hanau was born in Paris on 1 January 1886 to Jewish parents from Alsace who kept a small shop. Exactly the same facts, worded differently, appear in the German and Italian editions. Why does this English edition use different facts? --Hors-la-loi (talk) 22:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth and origins
Talk:Barefoot mailman

message: Also, the third link, to the Sun Sentinel article, fails. CodeCarpenter (talk) 19:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What does a Boy Scout hike have to do with this article? Seriously, how does mention of a Boy Scout hike add to this article? -- Donald Albury 00:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of the annual Boy Scouts Barefoot Mailman hike? 

message: I have problems with the book, A Guide-Book of Florida and the South for Tourists, Invalids and Emigrants, by Brinton. The copyright date is 1869, but the description of the mail route from Jupiter to Miami is anachronistic for that date. There was a Fort Jupiter post office, 1855-56, and then a Jupiter post office, briefly in 1884, and then from 1887 on. :Coconut Grove got its first post office in 1875, and Lemon City (as Motto) in 1889. I can't find a date for the first post office in Miami, but I'm fairly sure that it was established later that the Coconut Grove post office. It is highly unlikely that there was mail service between Jupiter and Miami in 1869. The Star route known as the "barefoot route" did start from Jupiter in 1885-1887, but was shortened to start from Palm Beach in 1887. I suspect that the Guide-Book was periodically updated, without changing the copyright date (the author, in the Introduction, requests readers to submit corrections and updates). However, all the sites (that don't require registration) that have the text of the book available have the same version. -- Donald Albury 15:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brinton book 

message: The Smithsonian has a  GSA-owned (commissioned?) mural of one of the barefoot mailmen. Might be worth considering getting on Commons, but I don't have time at the moment to do a thorough investigation of the copyright situation. LuisVilla (talk) 02:27, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible image? 
Talk:Houses of Refuge in Florida

message: What about New england, especially Syracuse and Philadelphia where the movement was first set into motion.
--FuzzyTheGood 21:29, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the rest of the U.S.? 

message: It seems that the Coast Guard completely revises its Web pages every 3 or 4 years, so almost all the source links are dead. I've had to redo all the links before, and I'll do so again, as I find time. - Donald Albury 11:34, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coast Guard Web pages moved again
Talk:Dinner Key

message: I created the Pan Am building article. Merged it into this one, no prob. I like to link to existing articles anyway, rather than create new ones. I'm waiting on adding the infobox, as there may be a new type that will be appropriate. We'll see.
Later!  --Ebyabe 13:37, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is still a short article. I wish I could find more to add to it. -- Donald Albury 00:21, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged the article

message: The article on the auditorium has been around for 5 years, and is still only 4 sentences long. I don't feel any urgency on this, just thought it might tidy things up a bit. -- Donald Albury 15:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Coconut Grove Convention Center aka Dinner Key Auditorium

message: The show has a permanent set built in the former Coconut Grove Convention Center  which it has used for the first six seasons.  The show has worked out a deal for a seventh and final season.  This was pending agreements by the network for a seventh season and agreement of the city counsel.  these seemed to have been worked out since USA network is advertizing all new episodes starting in Summer 2013. Plmerry (talk) 10:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Burn Notice Filmed at Coconut Grove Convention Center
Talk:Indonesian Idol

message: There's a really badly written article called Mike Mohede which appears to actually be about Indonesian Idol.  If someone familiar with the show could check it out and perhaps merge material to here and delete it from there... NickelShoe 22:47, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Mike Mohede]]

message: On looking at the disputes here I would say that there isn't any need for reversion because the IP seems to be copyediting in good faith (ie genuinely trying to make a good contribution) and I can't see the advantage of the constant reversions. However, I think more communication is necessary from both sides, and I think both should explain here why they think the article should go with their version, and then I feel that a merged version will surface naturally. I would also warn the involved parties of the ease of which they may inadvertedly break 3RR, damaging their position. Hope I've helped. —Xyrael / 16:28, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Third opinion]] 

message: There are no regular updates in this article as to sources - considerable amounts of this article might have to be deleted if there is inadequate identification of sources SatuSuro 09:50, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources?

message: It needs severe editing and possibly broken up into at least three articles to make any sense - suggestion is (1) Indonesian Idol Early series, (2) Indonesian Idol Current series, and possibly a third article - Indonesian Idol - general overview without so many red links SatuSuro 13:18, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The article is too large
Talk:Chief risk officer

message: plz add a redirect from "chief risk officer" or even better move this article. --84.161.147.110 22:47, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Template talk:Hebrewterm

message: Please don't use this template. Use individual  templates for Hebrew terms and their transliteration. Use   (compare ) for text in Hebrew alphabet, Use  for transliterations of Semitic. There can be  or similar once people sort out Hebrew transliteration standards (compare ). dab (ᛏ) 16:02, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad idea
Talk:Dom Capers

message: Stop adding that he's a def coordinator for the Packers. That's a unverifiable claim, until it is officially announced. Which will likely happen this afternoon. http://www.packers.com/news/releases/2009/01/19/1/  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.229.144.64 (talk) 17:51, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Packer coach (yet) 
Talk:Alva R. Fitch

message: Proposal to merge-there is duplication of this article, under "Alva R. Fitch" and "Alva Revista Fitch" Chris 22:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It was made a redirect page. Rlevse 18:18, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: from Autobiography of Alva Revista Fitch, Fitch family genealogy collection, unpublished, page 4
Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 21:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Eagle pedigree
Talk:CDW

message: Not mentioned in the article is that CDW also conducts retail e-commerce. An example is found on these pages, current as of 14 MAY 2021:
https://www.cdw.com/search/networking/routers/?w=RG
https://www.cdw.com/product/t-mobile-franklin-t9-mobile-hotspot/5802728
161.69.112.11 (talk) 14:45, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

message: Do you make wrist watches 2601:1C1:8102:3B80:705D:8A7D:F3C2:3690 (talk) 04:15, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watches
Talk:St. John's Northwestern Military Academy

message: wow.  I didn't think what I wrote would make such a problem.  Trust me, I hate that school as much as the next cadet, but I was trying to make the article as unbiased as I could be.  I was going to add more, but I'll just stop now. 
: I really liked what you wrote, I don't know why it was removed.  I live in Wisconsin and knew just a tad about the Academy.  However, after reading what you had wrote, it gave me more information than what the artical currently contains.  Maybe it was vandalism?  I say put it back and if someone takes it out again maybe they will explain their reasoning? --V3rt1g0 00:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  General
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Intelligent designer

message: I move to speedy keep this article and close this AFD. There's strong consensus to keep and the bringer of this AFD seems less than well-informed on the topic. FeloniousMonk 23:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a valid AfD and always was.  The nominator didn't ask for a merge, the nominator, acting in good faith, suggested that the article might have some valid points that could be salvaged but insisted on a redirect that will destroy the article.  In the future there will only be nominating business and no polite ameliorating suggestions.  Endomion 02:15, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Speedy Keep
Talk:Yisrael Alter

message: There was a specific connection between The Alter of Ger and the Lubavitcher Rebbe. Anyone have moer on this?--Reb Roovie 23:13, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

message: A Gerer vandal is reverting my edits which he/she is uncomfortable with (both here and in the main "Ger" page) and replacing it with propaganda that is inappropriate for Wikipedia. See "history" for some interesting facts.Ortho 04:05, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandal 

message: He had a special closeness to survivors of the Nazi holocaust.
He loved outgoing and controversial people. He would seek out, encourage and welcome these people even if they were not "Gerer Hasadim".
He had no time for Wimps and Simpletons
He had an overriding concern which covered all his Hasadim (mostly teenage boys in his Yeshivas) including "Wimps and Simpletons"
That was "Kadusha vTahara". No sexual impropriety.
Take the case of a shy and introverted young lad in one of his Yeshivas.
The Bais Yesroel would assign him a “commandant” a “personal guide”, who would only be a few years his senior . 
He would counsel , or rather befriend the young lad in order to find out the young mans sexual history. The “commandant” would report to the Rabbi and would report back instructions to our shy young lad.
NOTHING was done to improve and boost the young lads self confidence or to help him make friends and make him GROW.
ALL that mattered was Kadusha vTahara apart for that, the boy could die. And nobody would care.
The Bais Yisroel DIDN’T care as long as he had his Kadusha vTahara..
I know of one such case were a young boy in one of his Yeshivas attempted a suicide and survived, only by the grace of Hasham.
The Bais Yesroel may have been Holy but he had NO IDEA on how to educate his young men. The trouble was that he gave positions of power in his Yeshivas to “his” people who also had no idea about education. With disastrous effects.
Thank God that there were a few good Educators about. Like Reb Godel Eizner. But he was a minority and people like him were not encouraged.
People loved his dynamic leadership style but it was hard and brutal, and their hearts aced for a warm and caring father.
This they had with his successor The Lev Simcha. A Warm and truly caring Rabbe.
 
Pity that his subject is taboo as many people suffered under the Bais Yisroel leadership.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by EirenAY (talk • contribs) 12:00, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hard Style
Talk:Zoids: Fuzors

message: I'm creating this page based on what I know and can find on Fuzors. Although I've only seen the English Dubbed episodes. For anyone who watched all the Japanese episodes, some help filling in the blanks on this page would be very much appreciated. Also, thanks for the extra added info on the "series comments" section. - atomofish
Not a problem. I'll do what I can. Please forgive my crappy typing; most of this is being done at work. --202.92.76.129 23:47, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: A little help

message: I was just watching episode 5 on megavideo.com, and I came across some dialouge that shocked me, as well as giving me a giggle fit. Here's the URL- Go to 19:25-
http://megavideo.com/?v=CBW8FBIW
Emo sociopath: "What? the peace keeping buerau?"
Cliche cowboy: "Attention! Cease fire immediatley!"
Emo sociopath: "Yeah, right. Go get bent."
WTF!? Cartoons can say that now? I mean, I always thought that this show's dialouge was a little edgy (Yes, "Sucks" and "Idiot" are edgy compared to new century zero), but really? He was actually suggesting that another character perform intercourse on a KID'S SHOW? That's full blown naughty! Wierd! 69.121.179.87 (talk) 02:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Go get bent"?!?
Talk:Mystery Machine

message: * I think that this article can stay as seperate art. Mystery Machine is a very popular name connected with Scooby Doo - and it is good material for interesting article. Andrew18 @ 21:27, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I think the article at present is crap, but among fictional vehicles it's fairly well-known. Sarge Baldy 23:11, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not merge 

message: Does anyone know how to find out about the Mystery Machine that was featured in the old Penny Arcades?  It was a "guess what" sort of thing and for a penny you could fool around with it and try to figure out what it could do.  I believe that would be the original Mystery Machine. Zipzip50 (talk) 09:34, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Penny Arcade Machine .
Talk:UGodz-Illa Presents: The Hillside Scramblers

message: This entry needs an explanation of what it is, who the band are, and any references or links to them. --Jorvik 23:30, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *i think there's more to it than that... this is Baby U's solo/showcase album for a group of up-and-coming proteges in the period when he left the Wu briefly. will get onto adding some of this detail to the page... W guice 19:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:L-1 visa

message: It is a little confusing, at first it says the visa is normally good for 3 years, than it says 7 years for management and 5 years for general workers.--kelapstick (talk) 18:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 or 5 years 

message: There is considerable controversy surrounding the issue of continued issuance of visas to import foreign labor during the current record high unemployment.  This is certainly relevant and deserves mention.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.163.111 (talk) 19:24, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no "controversy" section? 

message: This article refers to L1 visa as "non-immigrant visa" while Dual intent and United States visas describe all L visas as dual intent visas.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.66.220.190 (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-immigrant visa? 

message: [1] reciprocity link is broken for example  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Srsmoot (talk • contribs) 02:45, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References need checking 

message: — Assignment last updated by STEMLaborPolicy (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Technology Workforce Directed Study
Talk:Rheumatism

message: My friend said to take glucosamine and aspirin for my rheumatism. I have started it today. --Mihai cartoaje 23:34, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: glucosamine

message: I have altered the first-line NSAID treatment to naproxen from diclofenac, in recognition of prescribing habits after diclofenac was found to cause stroke much more often than either ibuprofen or naproxen. http://www.theheart.org/article/1119849.do David100351 (talk) 15:36, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Treatment

message: Hello.
I am a member of WikiProject Medicine, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of medicine. Since your article has fallen under our scope, I have placed the correct template(s) on this talk page for verification. Upon reviewed of the article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown below:
*Assess article with class and importance factors
I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 04:59, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Assessment for [[WP:MED|WikiProject Medicine]]

message: The article currently includes, after a list of diverse conditions:
I suspect the intent is:
.
I'm not part of the Medical Wikipedia team, nor certain enough to make this change myself. But "etiology" does seem correct. And "their epidemiology" doesn't makes sense to me. Certainly not in-context.
(Please let me know whether this is the appropriate manner and place to raise this sort of correction or question. Thanks! Netpog (talk) 15:16, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error(?) regarding "epidemiology" vs "etiology" 

message: This section is not needed. As per the article intro, "rheumatism does not designate any specific disorder, but covers at least 200 different conditions". Rheumatism is not a disease per se, and as such, a diagnosis section does not apply. Suggest deleting. Cotedesneiges (talk) 22:58, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "diagnosis"
Talk:Linux Router Project

message: Dcinege, aka Dave Cinege, should not be editing this page.  Why?  WP:NPOV & WP:NOR.  --Stuinzuri (talk) 07:01, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dcinege should stay way from this page 

message: Dcinege, me Dave Cinege, actually wrote this software and rewrote the article a few years ago. If someone doesn't feel it's neutral then edit it as such. The current article appears to be edited to marginalize the project, by people that do like it and/or me.
Stuinzuri edits have removed references and appear to be vandalism. His justification is a personal attack against me. (?!? Are you serious?) That purged content has been restored.
LRP is still relevant to this day, especially with the active use of derivatives and the lawsuits surrounding Busybox. Regardless it's historically relevant, otherwise one may as well delete the article on MS-DOS; it's not actively maintained and hasn't had a release in 10 years as well.
Information referring to other projects 'taking over' or 'continuing on' LRP are false. There were never (to date and my knowledge) any efforts to continue further development on LRP as released, or what was in progress. (Some of the specifications of what was in development were posted to the mailing list making them 'published'.)
Many derivatives of LRP are currently maintained, however viewed as an Operating System no fundamental architectural
changes took place. From my point of view that means no development has taken place. Argue the verb-age if you like.
Again LRP was a misnomer is that it was progressing into a complete re-write of the GNU/Linux userland outside of common POSIX dogma. This architectural planning and development is what made it unique and influential, and how it stands out from other distributions of Linux that where merely modified for a specific purpose. (Which is how LRP originally started out.)
Finally information not specific to the software project, obviously, does not belong in the article. -DCinege (talk) 09:01, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dcinege is an authoritative source 

message: I was a LRP user and I observed the transformation of the project from LRP to LEAF.  Efforts by Dcinege to "remove the LEAF advertisement" are stupid... I imagine that most people likely to read this article are people who used to use LRP who know the LRP/LEAF history and how the LRP users migrated to LEAF. Please also note that this change is referenced (unlike most of the rest of this entry). If anyone familiar with LRP wants to independently verify this, just look at the image names which are identical (e.g., Bearing, Dachstein). Or read this /. article which mentions LEAF as a successor project repeatedly: http://linux.slashdot.org/story/03/06/23/0336228/linux-router-project-dead 67.162.21.248 (talk) 06:00, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I guess I'm also an authoritative source for LEAF