lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mark Wilson (English footballer)

message: Please do not move to Mark Wilson (footballer), as that is reserved for the Scottish footballer. Of course, one can make Mark Wilson (English footballer) and Mark Wilson (Scottish footballer), but given this Wilson's present location and lack of notoriety in England for him, it's an unneeded mess IMHO. --DR31 (talk) 02:44, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not move 

message: I'm not sure why Wilson is listed in the Manchester United 1998/99 squad on that RSSSF page when players like Raimond van der Gouw and Jonathan Greening (both of whom were on the bench for the final and actually received medals) were not included. I have an official UEFA stats handbook at home that I can check for Wilson's status, but that'll be in about 6 hours. – PeeJay 10:47, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I checked the handbook and Wilson isn’t listed at all, not even among a set of players who weren’t assigned squad numbers. That would seem to put him among the B-list of players registered for the competition. Since all players under a certain age are eligible for that list and essentially registered automatically, we shouldn’t say players from the B-list have won the competition unless they actually played in the competition (e.g. Wes Brown), otherwise we could list every player on the club’s books at the time, which would be ridiculous. – PeeJay 08:35, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1998–99 UEFA Champions League
Talk:Nobuyoshi Tamura

message: "Professor of Kendo" is a slightly odd phrase. Maybe it is supposed to mean "kendo teacher" (professeur = teacher in french)? / Habj 02:48, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Aleutian Islands

message: I added this group because I know that it's commonly overlooked.  But I have to admit that I couldn't remember the actual names (or number) of the islands in this group.  What I've put here (Chuginadak, Carlisle Island, and Herbert Island) I got off of an online article.  By no means do I vouch for its comprehensiveness or even necessarily accuracy.  But I didn't want to have a "group" that was empty--looked like it would be begging for a deletion. Unschool 03:19, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Islands of the Four Mountains

message: I changed the format of some links that were either wrong or pointed nowhere to include "(Aleutian Islands)". I only changed 1/3 of the links, so if someone is working on this page and dislikes my changes please protest! If no one protests I'll proceed with changing links in a couple of days.
Btw. how does one rename articles? This would be the following step. eike 28.05.06
I finally did big the renaming I announced!
* I renamed all remaining dead links now to include the characters "(Aleutian Islands)". 
* I also looked at the page of each island, when it existed. I changed a couple of links that pointed to unrelated Islands or to disambiguation pages. 
* Fire_Island_(Aleutian_Islands) got an own (stub) page. I just copied the information from the quite informative disambiguation page.
* I did some more small changes.
* I won't move any pages as it is much work, as one needs to update all links pointing to the moved page. 
I hope I didn't annoy anyone with these series of changes.
--eike 22:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming Links to include "(Aleutian Islands)"

message: I've added the Aleut place names in brackets behind on this page. Normally one would put them only on the main page, I know, but there are so many stubs and islands without pages here that it's probably better for the time being to just add them here. If anyone has a better idea do let me know but please don't just go and delete them ; )
--Akerbeltz 17:48, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aleut Place Names 

message: How about a little info after each island, like what towns are located there, any landmarks, anything about the island that stands out? One could go through and read each article for the islands that have articles, but I don't think many readers will do that. But if they see something interesting on this page, they may visit the island articles. Ghostofnemo (talk) 12:22, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info?
Talk:TP53 (version 2)

message: I've proposed the merge to P53. This is being discussed at Talk:P53#Proposed_merge_from_TP53. Carcharoth 14:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After discussion and tidying of both articles, no merge took place, and merge tags removed. Carcharoth 23:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge to [[P53]] 

message: This article needs categorisation. Carcharoth 14:50, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Carcharoth 23:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:Eclipse 500

message: The never exceed speed is quoted as 285 kts, where as the max speed is 370 kts. V_ne is a structural limit where as the V_max is a performance limitation; as such I would expect that V_max is less than V_ne, or at least a note stating that V_max is TAS and V_ne is KEAS or IAS. For reference, 370kts @ 41,000 ft is 183 KEAS.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.130.57.34 (talk) 03:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you answered your own question. Vne is indicated airspeed, whereas cruise speeds are true airspeeds. I have specified those in the specs, just to clarify. - Ahunt (talk) 15:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistency in the Speeds
Talk:Seiichi Sugano

message: I removed Sensei's contemporaries are Nobuyoshi Tamura Shihan, Yoshimitsu Yamada Shihan, Kazuo Chiba Shihan, and Mitsunari Kanai Shihan since I don't really understand the point of mentioning these names. / Habj 03:28, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: Is there more history available? Details of how Sugano came to live and instruct in each country, when the Shihan title was awarded, etc? Cesiumfrog (talk) 07:12, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: more history

message: Since aikido people in general have been categorized not only with birth country but also the place where they have lived and worked as aikido teachers, it is difficult to know what categories to use for Sugano sensei esp. regarding Europe. For now, I have included him in a bunch of categories, including "European aikidoka" rather than one category for each European country he has lived in. // Habj 16:10, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He should only be in the Japanese aikidoka category. I removed :Category:American aikidoka until we get a reliable source that says he has naturalized as an American citizen, which I don't think has happened. Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 19:26, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories for nationality 
Talk:Social anarchism

message: Reading over this article, I'm not sure how well it disambiguates from our article on libertarian socialism. This article often uses libertarian socialism as a synonym with social anarchism and, as a result, cites some sources that mention "libertarian socialism" but not "social anarchism". 
Which begs the question: are these two concepts actually different or just two terms for the same tendency? If they are different concepts, then that needs to be made explicitly clear. If they are the same thing, then these articles should probably be merged. --Grnrchst (talk) 11:14, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok. I have now rebuilt this article using reliable sources that verifiably use the term "social anarchism". This should be a better skeleton from which this article can be built on and improved in the future. To any future article contributors reading this: please stick to sources that actually use the terminology, or this can very quickly spiral out into a mess of original research once again. Regards. -- Grnrchst (talk) 18:42, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this different from [[libertarian socialism]]? 

message: In the Criticism section, Paul Thagard's criticism takes up a third of the section. He is a philosopher of science and cognition, his epistemic authority on the subject of anarchism seems disputable.
What are your thoughts? vic (talk) 02:19, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not wedded to Thagard being included. Honestly I'm not even sure a dedicated criticism section is necessary for the article. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed it. vic (talk) 15:23, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of Paul Thagard?
Talk:Andrew Lyne

message: Is there a good reason to quote Lyne so extensively? Also, is it possible to get some reaction from his fellow physicists to his famous "3d possibility" announcement? (As I heard the story, he offered 3 possibilities: a new planet, an anomaly in the data, or a mistake...) Wasn't that around the same time Pons & Fleishman were doing "20/20"? Also, it should be noted Lyne has discovered more pulsars than any other scientist.  Trekphiler 03:53, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added many stuff on fr: page, for those who would be interested. Alain r 13:32, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More stuff on fr:
Talk:Foreign contacts of ancient Egypt

message: The only author of content on this page has used wikipedia to push an anti-scientific and not-accurate POV. Please see Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Roylee. Hipocrite - «Talk» 03:54, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roy Lee 

message: I just found this page, & was surprised that the controversy surrounding both it & its contributer was not posted to Wikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Egypt. (Just a suggestion in the future.)
As to the content of the article itself, while I find its content rather sketchy & in need of augmenting, I don't see anything wrong with it after a first read. Ancient Egypt despite common assumptions did have contacts with the world beyond from the Old Kingdom on, as shown by finds over eastern Africa, the Middle East, & the eastern Mediterranean. Byblos was an important intermediary for Egypt, for example, & a casual read of Hittite articles in Wikipedia find proof that the first international treaties involved Egypt as a party.
That said, I'm not clear as to the point of this article. Was it written to combat this common misunderstanding, or to advocate some specific POV? In either case, I don't see a clear reason to keep the disputed tag on this article. -- llywrch 19:19, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:Maestro (Kaizers Orchestra song)

message: So, I'm pretty sure that these lyrics are copyrighted.  If anyone can confirm that, we should probably remove them. Tony 03:56, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Um... how do you say "copyright" in Norwegian?

message: 'I myself visited one of their concerts ...' Since when do encyclopediae speak in first person? --Tinctorius 18:57, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since when are people too lazy to make a change instead of bitch about it?  Come on, this is the point of a Wiki!  --LakeHMM 05:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation badly needed
Portal talk:Biology/Archive 1

message: Cool! Kudos to the creator(s). Pcb21| Pete 00:08, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Now someone is needed to actually maintain the portal, as I'm not very much into biology - I just translated the Polish wikiportal as an example :). Ausir 00:19, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: i agree, as well as making the page easier to edit. Onco p53 04:52, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: There are no links on this portal to Wildlife, Nature or Conservation topics. I think there should be. Andy Mabbett 6 July 2005 10:04 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. Ausir 10:54, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: A wider view
Talk:List of artists who reached number one on the Australian singles chart

message: this page is a work in progress. I have included all artists who have hit number one from the present to 1991. Underneath-it-All 03:57, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: added more up until 1979 Underneath-it-All 07:15, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: done up until 1972 Underneath-it-All 18:39, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

text: all done!! Underneath-it-All 23:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  work in progress
Talk:Tom's Restaurant

message: I don't see the reason for needing to cite this sentence: "The trademark "Tom's Restaurant" marquee still exists above the exterior windows.[citation needed]". This is simply a fact, (ie. the marequee does still exist). What kind of citation could one use? A recent photograph of the resturuant? (I have one). I just think it is silly to give a citation for this. It'd be like needing to cite whether or not the Empire State Building still exists. I have removed the request for a citation. If anyone disagrees, let me know. I also can upload a recent photo of the marquee, however, the only one I have ATM is one where I am in the picture.
66.152.115.67 (talk) 10:33, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: 1) Is there an article about the other diner? 2) Is the other diner noteworthy enough to be included in a Wikipedia entry? The reason this diner has been singled out as having a wikipedia entry is because of its association with Seinfeld, along with its association with the song Tom's Diner, not because of how long it has been open. Unless there is some special history behind the other restaurant, or something as notable, I don't see why there would even need to be a page for it. Liontamarin 12:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not, whats with all the "article police" lately judging what does and doesn't deserve an article. I see worthy articles deleted all the time, while completely worthless articles aren't noticed.  24.185.31.111 02:47, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Article subjects need to be proven notable by reliable outside sources. It has nothing to do with personal judgment. In this case the diner in question was featured heavily in two popular aspects of pop culture and has been discussed in varying media because of such. If the other Tom's Diner has received significant discussion then it deserves a page, if it hasn't then it doesn't and there's no need to make a disambiguation page. 24.190.34.219 (talk) 01:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How did it come to be called Tom's?--Rich (talk) 18:54, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Name
Talk:Anthony Bourdain

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 01:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 

message: In the Interests and advocacy section, it says "Regarding what he considered to be the myth that monosodium glutamate in Chinese food is unhealthy..." Does that wording seem to imply that it was merely believed to be a myth by Bourdain but may not be? In other words is this a case of giving undue weight to a viewpoint? For comparison, the article on monosodium glutamate plainly calls "Chinese restaurant syndrome" a myth in the lead section and provides sources. Sarbz (talk) 01:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV issue in wording around quote about MSG myth? 

message: Anthony Bourdain played himself on Archer. But I can’t see no mention of it on this page. Can somebody please add. 49.185.40.136 (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anthony Bourdain on Archer
Talk:Stump Merrill

message: Just in case anyone was wondering, I started this article not because Stump Merrill is particularly notable, but because he was the only NY Yankees manager missing from a list of Yankees managers in another article.  (Or at least the only one in the past 50 years.)  For the same reason, I started the article on Stan Bahnsen not because he was the least notable retired player without an article on Wikipedia (I am sure he isn't) but because he was the only AL Rookie of the Year (at least within my lifetime) who did not have an article, and he appeared as a "red link" in the succession box of AL Rookies of the Year.  In case anyone was wondering.  :)  6SJ7 04:12, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be an interesting note that Stump managed over one of the worst periods in Yankee history. Can anyone verify the 1990 Yankees team was the worst in their history?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.128.31.63 (talk • contribs) 
:Not quite, but the worst in a long long time.  This 1990 team was 67-95 (.414).  In 1913 they went 57-94 (.377), and the year before that 50-102 (.329).  That 1912 team is technically the worst in their history.  Stump's year and a half could certainly be listed as "one of" the worst periods, however.  -- dakern74 (talk) 20:26, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note
Talk:Tetsuro Nariyama

message: I hope I got it right that he is the current head of the organisation? If so, that should be in the first sentence. / Habj 04:14, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lists of thriller films

message: should this be made into a category or something?  Jabencarsey 04:15, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is begining to look kind of ugly. Would anyone object if we re style it similar to this: "List of adventure films: 1950s"? That way we can have a list with better information, and still keep the sub-genres of Thriller films. If there are not objections, I'll get to it. Andrzejbanas 04:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Design
Talk:GeForce 2 series

message: Does the GeForce 2 MX400 support pixel shader 1.1? Sabrebattletank 04:15, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Does the GeForce 2 MX400

message: I have added a table to this page giving an overview of the basic features of each of the Gefoce2 Cards Candle 86 14:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables 

message: The table should probably include range of onboard RAM available. My GeForce 2 Ultra had 64MB. --Mal 19:53, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RAM 

message: The article says that:
>Members of the series include GeForce 2 MX, MX400, MX200, and MX100
AFAIR, MX100 chip was announced by nVidia, but no videocard manufacturer has ever released products which actually used it, as it was regarded to be too slow even for a low-end market segment. Actually, the sole difference between MX100 and 200 was 32bit memory bus vs 64bit (Compare to MX200 vs MX - the only difference is 64bit memory bus vs 128bit).
P h n (talk) 14:42, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is GeForce 2 MX100 worth mentioning?
Talk:Adoption of ODF in Europe

message: I have set this up as a length-reducing fork of OpenDocument, in order to concentrate on a specific subset of information previously available in that article.  Links and references still need to be moved.  Ρ--Thephotoman 04:18, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

message: This article may be unencyclopedic by the topic or advertising tone, featuring an ongoing public debate. Louie 05:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic, advertising tone
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/RadioKirk

message: I would like to express my thanks to everyone who voted, irrespective of your vote. Rather than view this as a rejection of my nomination, I consider this a validation: After only a few months of significant contribution to Wikipedia, you feel I'm almost ready to take on the responsibilities of an administrator.I will continue to contribute as I have, gaining the experience I need to join the admin community, should that opportunity arise again.Again, my thanks for your validation. RadioKirk 04:34, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Tie-in

message: I've proposed that Movie tie-in (book) be mergered into this article. See Talk:Movie tie-in (book). --Evb-wiki (talk) 14:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see how anyone could disagree, so I've complete the merger along with the Movie tie-in (video game) article I wrote some time back. Thanks, Marasmusine (talk) 16:18, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: I might use this Your Sinclair article for use in the video-games section. Marasmusine (talk) 15:20, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: This article is just a description of what tie-in books are, there's no history of the genre - how it started and early examples of it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.74.151.135 (talk) 13:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Mugwump (disambiguation)

message: Which came first: Silverberg's Mugwumps or Burroughs'? Can anyone locate a discussion of the strange coincidence that two fiction writers should in the same year (1959) hit on Mugwump as a name for their creations? --User:Quuxplusone, 04:52, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Which came first?

message: What about Albus Dumbledore? I think one of his titles was "Supreme Mugwump of the Wizengamut" or something similar. --141.35.111.108 19:09, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harry Potter 

message: I don't see the need for all these things on this page. A disambiguation page is supposed to direct people to different Wikipedia articles with similar names, not be a list of everything that has appropriated a certain name. Shouldn't this page just link to Mugwump and The Mugwumps, and then maybe mention the term's use in British politics and William Burrough's story as well? --Miskwito 22:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, first off, disambiguation pages should point to existing Wikipedia articles; when most of the entries don't exist as articles, they're essentially just dictionary definitions, which the disambiguation guidelines specifically urge against. So the issue of ordering is kind of moot, I think, since really only Mugwump and The Mugwumps should be linked to. Since "Mugwump" originated in politics, and since the description of The Mugwumps specifically says "they never achieved fame", I would suggest that Mugwump come first. Thoughts? --Miskwito 01:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Appropriate?

message: It's also the name of a techno group, Belgian I believe. JFW | T@lk 20:53, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Techno 
Talk:Maku, Iran

message: I propose that Maku (Armenia) be merged into Maku, Iran. The Maku (Armenia) page discussed the same town, but in an earlier period in history (where country boundaries were different); it's a small and poorly-referenced page, suggesting that it should probably be merged with a broader subject. This page seems ideal.Klbrain (talk) 11:26, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: In 1920-21, at a time when the Republic of Armenia was waging a war of independence, at the same time against Kemalist Turkey and Bolshevik Russia, the Persian sardar(governor) of Maku was the only military ally of Armenia against the invaders, in connection with the occupation of most of the Khanate of Maku by Turkish troops.Matianian (talk) 11:28, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: As noted clearly in the edit summary, that link is a copy of a Wikipedia article. It is obviously not a WP:RS. Simply re-add the material with competent sourcing, and you'll be fine. Kuru (talk) 12:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why this information unwanted?
Talk:Kokikai

message: Currently, this article and Shuji Maruyama contains the same information. I suggest we merge the article of the teacher into that of the style for now. If the information gets greatly expanded, they can be separated. / Habj 05:03, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a great plan. -- Mikeblas 01:43, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled