lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Piccolo oboe

message: where could one buy a piccolo Oboe?  --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.66.154.189 (talk • contribs) 
:The article lists the manufacturers who make them.  One probably has to contact those manufacturers directly (their websites are all linked from the Oboe page).  Also, an oboe/woodwind sales company could probably special order one.  It's a real specialty item so most wind instrument stores probably won't have one on hand.  Badagnani 16:37, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So you have two piccolo oboes now? Both in E-flat? Badagnani (talk) 20:38, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Where to buy?

message: I have two Patricola musettes. I would like to hear form other who own musettes or Piccolo oboes.
John Chance
There is a yahoo discussion group for people interested in musettes and other rare double reed instruments.
Johchance1@aol.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.87.9 (talk) 08:25, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piccolo oboes 

message: Which is the range of the Piccolo Oboe ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.82.114.53 (talk) 00:36, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range of the Piccolo Oboe 
Talk:Archi people

message: As the verbatim translation was made it needs to be checked for grammar issues. Thanks in advance, Ali-al-Bakuvi (talk) 17:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: . --JorisvS (talk) 18:59, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Vielen Dank. Ali-al-Bakuvi (talk) 08:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviewing 
Talk:The Poseidon Adventure (2005 film)

message: Two editors, one an IP and one registered, are going back and forth on whether to add that the ship sunk "bow first". The IP editor keeps adding it, and it is being removed with edit summaries questioning its relevance.
I only saw this film once, when it was in the theater in 2005, and don't have a substantive answer on its relevance, but I think it may be something along these lines: in the original 1972 film, it was a major plot point that the survivors of the impact being led by Reverend Scott were seeking to exit from the stern; while those led by the ship's purser was sending people to the bow. At the end of the film, it's made apparent that the ship was sinking bow first (it did not complete sinking even by the time the credits rolled), and that everyone who did not follow Scott perished. (In the book, as I recall, there was a small throwaway line that another rescue operation was going on at the bow, getting people out there, too; implying that Scott's more difficult route to the stern was ultimately pointless; because that's the way Gallico rolled.)
I suspect the IP is going somewhere around this kind of point; or maybe he's thinking of the 1972 film. But whether in the 2005 film that point was made, I can no longer recollect. Hopefully, though, this can kick off some discussion instead of edit wars. TJRC (talk) 23:09, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If that's the IP's argument then they need to say so rather than simply restoring the text. In any event, even if the ship had sunk stern first after the survivors had escaped, the point is that the ship sunk, not which part of it sunk first. At least, that's how I see it currently. DonIago (talk) 04:35, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "bow first"
Talk:Salt evaporation pond

message: The pages referred to in the merge tags appear to cover the same content as this page. If they represent different concepts, then they should be edited to make the distinctions clear, otherwise a merge should be performed. Park3r 16:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mergers

message: Could this be a salt evaporation pond, too?
* http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=-5.09,-81.13  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.146.240.2 (talk) 14:45, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Satellite Photo?
Talk:Gardelegen

message: Judging by what I've just read in an article, the massacre deserves to be covered in a lot more detail.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.190.26.203 (talk) 14:51, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is covered. But there are problems with the versions given about it. Did they die by bombing and strafing or was that an SS-Massacre. 105.4.2.157 (talk) 07:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Luna Park (Coney Island, 1903)

message: The panoramic I removed is of Dreamland. Luna was north of Surf Avenue and several blocks to the west (left) of Dreamland. -- Cecropia 16:31, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed photo 

message: I have un-merging what seems to have been an un-discussed unilateral merger of the articles Luna Park, Coney Island and Luna Park, Coney Island (2010) that should never have been merged. Two separate parks that have the same name do not go in the same article, "In Wikipedia, things are grouped into articles based on what they are, not what they are called by." WP:NAD. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 16:03, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Un-merged two different parks

message: I propose adding the 1906 map from the LOC collection of Sanborn Fire Insurance maps.
 - DutchTreat (talk) 13:43, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a very valuable map for the article, very informative to the reader.--Pharos (talk) 18:49, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:   map added to the article, thanks for the feedback. - DutchTreat (talk) 10:38, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1906 Map from Sanborn Fire Insuranace
Talk:Piracy in the British Virgin Islands

message: This article is a straight lift of a para from the old History of the British Virgin Islands article that I am endeavouring to consolidate.  Apart from adding the first para (including the quote from Colquhour about coloured privateers, which I rather liked) I have added nothing, but after I finish with re-writing History of the British Virgin Islands I am hoping to circle back and clean this up and put in a lot of missing material. --Legis (talk - contributions) 16:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History of the British Virgin Islands
Talk:Geislingen, Zollernalbkreis

message: *Tiago(*14.1.2018 )Spinal muscular atrophy  Tiago  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:D2:2F17:E23:147C:703B:D4AB:3753 (talk) 01:00, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people
Talk:Geislingen an der Steige

message: Presumably, the "important commercial route" was an Imperial road from the Holy Roman Empire, no?  Does anybody know which one?  Perhaps a bit of expansion would help clarify the article; I would WP:DIY, but don't have the time right now to do the research -maybe later-  assistance welcome! ~Thanks, E : 74.60.29.141 (talk) 18:51, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imperial road?
Talk:Amstrad Computer User

message: I was a game reviewer for ACU, and the three review panel didn't actually exist. --scruss 16:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

message: :Image:ACU8703-001.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ACU8703-001.jpg
Talk:IC4

message: I haven't specifically seen this phrase been uttered about this train, but I know this is true about the Metro, which uses material from the same company (Ansalo-Brenda)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.75.167.214 (talk) 00:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasle Words

message: This contradicts what is said elsewhere in the article, and I can’t see how it would be accomplished, given the design of the train; is this, as I suspect, a misprint for ‘without the possibility’?  David Arthur (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that the Libyan IC4, is a train that was produced for danish DSB, paid for by DSB, Built to DSB standard, has a DSB serial number and danish warning stickers. The train-set was produced for DSB at DSB's expense and then given to Libya at the same time as Ansaldo-Breda has been unable to deliver the contracted number of train-sets to DSB. Ansaldo-Breda still needs to deliver about 30 train-sets to DSB.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.191.204.248 (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Walking between trainsets
Talk:Pope Nicholas III

message: "Our" sources???
Whose sources? Is the catholic church editing this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.197.235.155 (talk) 06:55, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Come on be serious, not to defend Simony but we know nothing about the actual afterlife of Pope Nicholas III.
If I see no objections within a day or so I'll edit this section title to "Culture" or "Cultural Representations" bringing it into line with a similar section in the article on Pope_Boniface_VIII  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.4.214.91 (talk) 23:20, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afterlife Section ??? 

message: From the article:
:The concordat with Rudolph I of Habsburg was concluded in May 1278. In it the city of Bologna, the Romagna, and the exarchate of Ravenna were guaranteed to the papacy.
Is the Exarchate of Ravenna really guaranteed to the papacy after not having existed for over 500 years? I find that somehow hard to believe... - Andre Engels (talk) 21:56, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exarchate of Ravenna 

message: This article links the Colonna that Nicholas hatted to Sciarra Colonna, who I think might have been the Cardinal's nephew, or near relation.  It would be good if there was an article about the real Cardinal Colonna, who opposed and was sacked by Boniface VIII, but I can't find much information about him.1f2 (talk) 01:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The cardinal Colonna and Sciarra Colonna
Talk:Suffer the Children (EP)

message: Strange, I have a copy of the CD Single, and the tracklisting on the single is as follows:
01-Suffer the Children
02-Siege of Power (different then the version on Scum)
03-Harmony Corruption
I wonder where this came from?24.68.50.33 (talk) 08:45, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suffer the Children (CDS) 

message: I propose that Suffer the Children (EP) be merged into Harmony Corruption. I think that the content in the Suffer the Children (EP) article can easily be explained in the context of Harmony Corruption, and the Harmony Corruption article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Suffer the Children (EP) will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Suffer the Children (EP) is a single taken from Harmony Corruption. IndustrialGiant (talk) 22:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Holy Cross Preparatory Academy

message: "92% of the school's graduates go onto four-year colleges and universities, with another 13% continuing their education at junior colleges or trade schools." These statistics may be correct (if some of the 13% are also included in the 92%) but they need to be stated differently. "another 13%" is definitely not correctly phrased.  Jodi.a.schneider 16:44, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: College stats
Talk:2005 Al Hillah bombing

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MkativerataCCI (talk) 19:43, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Browning ANM2

message: What is the reason for this article?  The .30 Cal AN/M2 is already in the M1919 article and the .50 caliber AN/M2 is already in the M2 Browning article.  It is not different enough to warrant its own article in my mind. -- Thatguy96 16:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I still don't see a compelling reason for it to be a seperate article.  The "additional history" required for this article is simply a regurgitation of that in the M1919 article.  Furthermore it is in the M1919 article, and in the .50 caliber M2 article.  I would like a compelling reason for how this article will not remain a stub better merged with the M1919 article in the end. -- Thatguy96 03:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ikachan

message: I request a better link be found for the English translation, as the current version crashes when Ikachan levels up. 83.70.178.165 16:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello, y'all! I'm still new to the Wikipedia editing process, so my problem is as follows:
I have come to having found out v 1.0 of the release of this game in its original Japanese is dated as April 18, 1999 in its README file. Since this file is straight from the creator, and the current Japanese release date on this site has no source, I thought it would make sense to change it. However, I'm not sure how I would go about entering the source. Do I just mention it as the source, or do I include the link? Is it supposed to be the download link, or a website that hosts a download link for it.
Thanks! YellowpowR (talk) 04:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing the Release Date, But... Need Help
Talk:Sweet Sacrifice

message: Should this article mention the CNN interview with clips of Sweet Sacrifice? i dont think it has any valuable info in it but i was just putting it past anyone who reads this
if you havent seen it yet go to this site: http://www.cnn.com/video/player/play...f.windup&wm=11        
Zacanescence 09:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Already added and placed. -- Huntster T • @ • C 23:37, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CNN Interview 

message: should we really be using that cover? its not the actual cover its the promo cover for radio Zacanescence 09:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely not useful for long-term, but let's leave it until we get something official.  The current one can then be placed in the secondary cover slot, with explanation as to what it is. -- Huntster T • @ • C 17:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

text: According to evanescencewebsite.com, this is the single cover. It was apparently found on MSN Music Website: http://img241.imageshack.us/img241/8475/sweetsacrificenh7.jpg  Sparkling Gray 19:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've searched high and low and cannot locate anything that looks like that on either Google or the MSN Music site.  I would say that this should be discounted as fancruft until otherwise independently verified on an official/reputable website. -- Huntster T • @ • C 19:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CD Cover 

message: I removed the tracklisting that was on the article because it has not ben verified by any reputable sources yet. It may still be correct, but until it is verified, the tracklist should stay off the main article. Gyakusetsu 23:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My fault, perhaps.  When I made a few fixes to that section last, I removed a note that mentioned the data had come from jpc.de, and failed to add a proper citation afterward in its place.  Oh well, fixed now. -- Huntster T • @ • C 08:24, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracklisting 

message: should this song be considered nu metal, alternative metal or hard rock? 99.224.130.20 (talk) 21:26, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  alternative rock? 

message: This review of the São Paulo 2009 show says that "Some hits were left out, like Sweet Sacrifice and Everybody's Fool" (translated from Portuguese). And YouTube also agrees that the song wasn't played there. And Amy said before performing the song during a live show on March 29, 2012: "We did this one yeserday for the first time in about five or six years". --Markhoris (talk) 17:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This song wasn't played at the November 8, 2009 show
Talk:Olimpiiska (Kyiv Metro)

message: .
This article was moved from the said title without reliable source backing its renaming of the station in question. Kiev Metro official site also doesn't show any evidence that the station is renamed to Olimpiyska. Sameboat - 同舟 (talk) 13:55, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved it back to its previous name. Of course if there is any official recognized change in the name we'll incorporate that into the article, but just speculations or rumors then no. --ddima/talk 15:13, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert move request
Talk:Farther Away (song)

message: Would it be relevant to post the lyrics? --Annerpapaya 14:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, under no circumstance can copyrighted lyrics be posted in full here.  That's just part of how Wikipedia handles copyright law. -- Huntster T • @ • C 15:16, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics
Talk:Manhattan streets, 23-42

message: I created an article, Manhattan streets, 1-14, which would be a good companion piece for this article. Of course, the obvious problem is that streets 15th through 22nd are missing. I propose that this article expands to include 15-22 (and possibly 43-59), and Manhattan streets, 15-59.
The reason is that 1-14 covers Downtown streets that aren't completely part of the grid, while the grid begins in earnest at 15th and the basic form remains unchanged up to 59th. 
Thoughts? Suggestions? talk to Ytny 17:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I agree with this. It wouldn't be so hard to break up into sections, and it's better than creating arbitrary divisions. The question I have is, would you have a separate list for east-west streets and named streets that go north-south? Ytny (talk) 15:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion? 

message: * Please see Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Manhattan_Streets  --Hateu 22:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nominated for Deletion

message: I've merged this article to the above one, and removed it from WP:USST. Thanks — alex.muller (talk • edits) 19:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to [[Manhattan streets, 15-59]]
Talk:Ujazdów Castle

message: Does the Castle take its name from the Ujazdów district?  Or from Aleje Ujazdowskie (Equitation Avenue)?  Would it make sense to rename the article "Ujazdów Castle"?  "Ujazdowski Castle" is not very satisfactory in English, given that English doesn't make the sort of adjectival gender distinctions that Polish does.  logologist|Talk 04:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Ujazdów Castle"?

message: I couldn't find refs for the following claim, so it was removed. Feel free to restore if refs are found. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 19:38, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced claim 

message: Confirmed for WPPOLAND per milhist review. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 15:52, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  B-class
Talk:Ten (2002 film)

message: The trivia section is redundant and it adds little to the article.  I suggest that it be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.36.153.205 (talk) 00:59, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion of trivia section

message: "Mausoleum" implies that someone is visiting the grave of a dead relative. In this case what is erroneously translated as "Mausoleum" is the burial place and shrine of a saint or martyr. You will note that women visiting the site do not wear makeup out of deference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:6AE5:2510:0:0:0:46 (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mausoleum
Talk:Five (2003 film)

message: The IMDB lists the filming location as Gijón, Asturias, Spain -- not the Caspian Sea.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.95.34.14 (talk) 15:29, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a difficult question for many of Kiarostami's films and those of other Iranian directors. I don't know this specific film, but I know that these films often seem to be documentaries. There are no professional actors, there doesn't seem to be a script (but there often is). But everything that is seen on the screen is intended by the director. Sometimes even the tiniest things are arranged by the director even though it seems randomly when watching the film. So I would be very careful to call films like these documentaries. --92.72.199.225 (talk) 01:38, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Będzin Castle

message: Failed due to insufficient citations and coverage; both issues primarily concern the Architecture section. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 22:20, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review
Talk:Ronnie Barron

message: I removed the following from the article and bring it here for discussion:
:In 1988 Ronnie appeared in the motion picture Above The Law with Steven Seagal, who became a close personal friend of his. He played a slimy bartender that kept popping up throughout the whole film for no apparent reason. In one scene, where his character has been arrested, he mentions his cousin also from Algiers, Bob Fouquet. In the back ground Ronnie character is heard saying with his thick New Orleans accent, "Hey, I got a little cousin who's a cop down in New Orleans named Bob Fouquet. Ever heard of him?" Bob was the lead cop in the biggest drug sting operation In New Orleans called "The Trojan Horse Operation". Bob and Ronnie were very close growing up and Bob even taught Ronnie how to play the guitar when they were younger. This influenced him in becoming a musician. Ronnie has since gained an enormous cult following for the role.
I do not deny the truth of any of this, but the section is too long and detailed, contains information not relevant to this person, and is unreferenced.  Until these problems are dealt with, it should remain out. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 01:17, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Above The Law
Talk:Log analysis

message: The functions section can be a standalone section that describes log analysis's role in typical IT management and how it contributes to various processes and collaborates with other tools and methodologies. 
Technologies can describe specific methods, as in AI, ML, or others to elaborate to readers how vendors are broadly approaching this domain. 
Jake Blunt (talk) 08:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Functions and Technologies should be separate sections
Talk:Christ Church, Spitalfields

message: This page could do with 
*a link to Spitalfields (don't think it's mentioned) - oh, it's hidden in a heading.
*citations! I think the latest addition is Cruickshank
*mention of the principle Huguenot church on Brick Lane - now a mosque (100metres away)
*some reorganisation, suffers from multiple editors!
*check the listed building status (it is!), suspect grade I
*details of the Spitalfields festival, it started to save this building, and this is still the centre of it.
Kbthompson 17:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mention of the crypt being used as a shelter during WW2.©Geni (talk) 21:31, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled