lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:WikiProject Oklahoma

message: I put the Oklahoma portal link into the template - it seems like a good thing to do, as the only real link to the Oklahoma portal was on the Oklahoma article. This way the portal can have more exposure and be more accessible and useful to users. Okiefromokla•talk 01:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oklahoma Portal

message: The Template still requires a listas parameter but the documentation does not specify that. Either the requirement or the documentation should be changed. Agathoclea (talk) 07:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added in the needed info thanks for letting us know that the info was missing for the instructions.--Dcheagle • talk • contribs 19:45, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listas
Talk:Jyoti Prasad Agarwala

message: What's his native language? Please provide his name in the script of his native language. Thanks. --Ragib 23:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is unlikely it was Hindi.  His uncle was an Assamese writer too.  And his ancestor had migrated into Assam in 1811 when Hindi was not at all pravalent.  His family could have spoken the Marwari language, which again is unlikely.  Chaipau 02:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: language

message: Its the only reliable source saying that Agarwala is the founder of Asamese cinema.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He is the founder of Assamese cinema because he produced and directed the first Assamese movie.  You could refer to the IMDB record for Joymoti.  The source you are citing is more appropriate for Assamese cinema.  Chaipau 02:20, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The hindu article

message: I think it is ludicruous to try to categorize JPA as an Agarwal.  He was a universal person and his ideals were universal too.  He tried to bring people together (his message in Joymoti, for instance).  He wrote in Assamese because he was born in Assam and he grew up among Assamese.  He would have done the same thing anywhere else.  Chaipau 02:47, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, whatever.Bakaman Bakatalk 01:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing Agarwal Cat

message: English 117.237.225.70 (talk) 13:36, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jyoti prased Agarwala
Template talk:Blackadder characters

message: Queen Victoria and Prince Albert should already have had all their children by the time this takes place, because of Blackadder's reference to their '112 children'. This means it must be a Christmas between 1857 and 1860 inclusive. Albert refers to Victoria being 'busy ruling India'. The British Crown took over direct rule of India in 1858, so if BCC took place at Christmas 1858 that would be fresh in Albert's mind so he'd be more likely to mention it. Jess Cully 19:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time of Blackadder's Christmas Carol
Talk:French Naval Aviation

message: The introduction has included 162 airplanes (130 of them combat-capable) further down in aircraft inventory it has operates 224 aircraft, including 60 combat jets and 89 helicopters. I presume that one of them is wrong ? MilborneOne 22:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be that the Aviation navale is a subpart of the Aéronautique navale which is the full name for the entire aviation branch of the Marine nationale. Born as a fusion of carrier squadrons and naval patrol air force implies that naval training and liaison aircraft are not included in the subtotal of 162. We really need a page about the Aéronautique navale, perhaps by moving and correcting this one. PpPachy 12:13, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Aircraft Operated

message: I plan to create the naval air base articles
Are they any objections to me using the "Place name" Naval Air Base as a translation of "Base d'aéronautique navale de "Place name"".
Gavbadger (talk) 14:11, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naval Air Bases 

message: For the squadron names would it be correct to use "4 Flotille" or "Flottille 17F"? Gavbadger (talk) 14:14, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The more usual form in French is "Flotille 17F" so perhaps that should be used. MilborneOne (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squadron naming structures
Talk:The New Barbarians

message: this is the same movie.
The english version called The New Barbarians was released in most of Europe. You can se the trailer here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqzlH64KZ_4 --Ezzex (talk) 10:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge now 

message: This film sucks on an humanly incomprehensible  level.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.118.200.168 (talk) 02:58, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  horrid
Category talk:High schools in New York City

message: How are we handling old schools that have morphed into educational campuses that host a number of new small schools? I would propose that, after the large schools close, their articles be moved (with a redirect left) from "NAME OF SCHOOL High School" to "NAME OF SCHOOL Educational Campus" (or equivalent), with links to the small schools included, and some information in the articles about current intracampus events and coordination, as well as the old information about the history of the schools.  Alternatively, we could keep all the new small school information together in the Educational Campus article, and have the small schools' names forward to it. I like the first idea better, though, and it seems more consistent with what's already there.  Not sure how (and whether) other cities have handled this. -Semisomna 01:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If we do this, we'll be adding enough new high school pages that we may well want to start splitting this page up by borough. -Semisomna 01:27, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Missa Salisburgensis à 53 voci

message: :a fate marginally less bizarre than that which befell the original engineering drawings for Blackpool Tower which were backed by fabric and were destroyed when the fabric was made into under garments by one of the designer's relatives.
Is this strictly necessary? Someone else made a comment, so I'm crossing it out. --Vlmastra 02:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia
Talk:Gian Maria Volonté

message: Who is this Mauriel Mojeron listed as his child? Any sources??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.171.251.64 (talk) 08:08, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children
Talk:Brian Hunter (first baseman)

message: Someone might want to add a disambiguation page to Brian Hunter the trade who caused Amaranth Advisors to loose $6.5 billion.  I would but I don't know how.  You could use http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/29/business/30cndhedge.html?ex=1317182400&en=62f7887818cca987&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss as a source. Outside Center 01:37, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Weston High School (Cazenovia, Wisconsin)

message: ==Which county?==
I changed Sauk County, Wisconsin to Richland County, Wisconsin because the Cazenovia, Wisconsin article reports that the village is in Richland County, Wisconsin. Could someone confirm this with a reliable source? Does the village straddle the county line? In which county is the school located? --Eastmain 01:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I recommend that it be moved to it's own individual shooting page so it can be categorised correctly along with all the other shootings, not just lumped in with the high school.  211.30.71.59 10:23, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Warriors of the Wasteland (film)

message: Well of course the two articles should be merged, as it is the same movie. However, it is known under both titles, but since the Italian title is closer to "The New Barbarians", that one should be chosen for the main page, and "Warriors of the Wasteland" as the most famous aka-title.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by KnatLouie (talk • contribs) 21:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed, making this article a re-direct now! Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:38, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Portal talk:Energy/Selected picture

message: Note: From June 2007 images are changed randomly from a pool of selected images, rather than being manually updated. The current pool of images used can be found here.
There is a need to expand the number of images in the pool, so please note your ideas below.
====Incineration fire====
I suggest one of my own contributions for the selected pics: Movinggrate.jpg from the incineration article. Nice vivid flames from household waste inside an incinerator.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Claush66 (talk • contribs) 22:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From June 2007

message: I suggest one of my own contributions for the selected pics: Movinggrate.jpg from the incineration article. Nice vivid flames from household waste inside an incinerator.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Claush66 (talk • contribs) 22:06, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incineration fire

message: * I suggest :File:Wind Turbines and Power Lines, East Sussex, England - April 2009.jpg to be added to the pool. --Elekhh (talk) 00:40, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: June 2010
Portal talk:Energy/Selected biography

message: Note: From June 2007 biographies are changed randomly from a pool of selected images, rather than being manually updated. The current pool of biographies used can be found here.
There is a need to expand the number of biographies in the pool, so please note your ideas below.
* Enrico Mattei?? Beagel 14:30, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Added, but it would be good to add more citations to the article ASAP. Gralo 20:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, and the French version is equally short so can't request a translation either. Gralo 20:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Interesting guy - however before adding him I think that it would be beneficial to clarify how his 'modern abiotic theory' differed from previous abiotic theories  (see also Abiogenic petroleum origin) Gralo 20:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

text:  used in seed 14. Beagel (talk) 18:34, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: From June 2007
Portal talk:Energy/Selected article

message: Renewable energy in Scotland Currently this is the only article about energy to have reached Featured Article status. 199.125.109.84 (talk) 18:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008

message: Unless there is valid objection, I would like to add Petroleum industry in Iran which is GA and up-to-date. Thanks. SSZ (talk) 08:16, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 2015
Talk:Gary Mallaber

message: Gary Mallaber, John Massaro, and Byron Allred were involved in writing a song titled "Unbelievable."  Coincidentally, all three were in the Steve Miller Band between 1982 and 1983.In 1984, a film titled Night of the Comet was released.  The soundtrack (Night of the Comet: Original Soundtrack) contains this song as performed by a band called Revolver.  This cannot be the same Revolver as Revolver or Revolver as they did not come about until 1990 and 2006 respectively.What is unclear to me is whether Revolver was a Mallaber/Massaro/Allred side-project or whether Revolver is a band that simply covered the song written by Mallaber/Massaro/Allred.  Further, if it is the latter, it is unclear whether the song was originally recorded by the Steve Miller Band and, if not, by whom it was originally recorded.If Mallaber was involved in a band called Revolver in the '80s, methinks it bears mentioning in the present article.(See a similar post posted at Talk:John Massaro#Revolver.)allixpeeke (talk) 00:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Revolver
Talk:Bram Tchaikovsky

message: Any thought about discussing the lyrics to "Girl Of My Dreams" in the entry?  There was some "Louie, Louie"-like controversy at the time because the album included no printed lyrics, and a later release of the 'official' lyrics (from the record company, perhaps, in response to the controversy? - my memory is failing me) were patently incorrect.  The 'official' lyrics for example stated that the second line was "She gave him a poem with the U.S. Mail," but most everyone agreed the band actually sang, quite clearly, "She came in the morning with the U.S. Mail."
Most agreed the song's "Judy" was not fully real, but it is not clear what she actually was.  Interpretations at the time ranged from a pen pal's photograph, to a fully imaginary friend, to an allusion to masturbation, to an inflatable sex doll.  (The latter, oddly enough, seems the most sensible when listening to the album version, though such a subject matter is totally at odds with the ringing guitars, plaintive vocals, and beautifully crafted pop hooks.)  Rather than put guesswork and speculation into an official Wikipedia entry, would there be any way to track down Bram or one of his mates to provide a once-and-for-all explanation? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.73.193.5 (talk) 02:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Micky Broadbent's son and I think maybe Bram's as well run the official Facebook page for the Bram Tchaikovsky group, you could contact them via those channels most likely. And as for Judy not being "real" she wasn't, the line "she came in the morning in the US mail" is correct, that's how you would get blow up dolls (to save embarrassment buying one in a sex shop), in the mail, it's a dead giveaway and I do know that for the conservative British public back then, those lyrics would have been considered lurid and crass and hence why the record company "changed them". Go here for an interesting take on that, the guy does a cover of the song and explains what he thinks it was about. 5.56.31.175 (talk) 16:13, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment in 2006
Talk:Ed McGivern

message: Was his record not broken by Jerry Miculek in '03?  Or is the standing record a different one?  Thernlund 02:04, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Miculek broke a number of McGivern's records, but the 5 shots in 2/5ths of a second record (listed in the Miculek article as .45 seconds, due to the 1/20th second precision of the mechanical stopwatches McGivern was using) still stands, to the best of my knowledge.  Miculek did break the 10 revolver/60 shots record by a fair amount, but his best time for 5 shots was .57 seconds, so he's got a ways to go there.  The .57 second time actually gives him a split time of .1425 seconds, which is just a tiny bit faster than the .1429 second split time of 8 shots in 1 second (not .125, because you divide 1 second by 7 intervals (see fencepost problem).  If there'd been an 8 shot DA revolver around in McGivern's day, he'd probably hold that record, too.  The man was awe inspiring, especially considering that he was a short, overweight, balding guy of 58 with the beginnings of arthritis when he set that record in '32.  He had to give up exhibition shooting soon after due to the arthritis.  scot 14:19, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah.  Ok then.  I didn't know enough about it to go editing that in.  Possibly you should?  Sounds like it would make a good addition to the article.  Thernlund 18:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fleshing out the article on McGivern is on my to-do list; unforunately my only source of info is a reprint of his book "Fast and Fancy Revolver Shooting", so it's got a lot on his research and techniques but not much biographical info.  Along with the speed shooting, he was one of the first to put a scope on a pistol and try long range, high precision pistol shooting.  He was shooting at 200 yards with .22 LR pistols, and out to 600 yards with the then brand-new .357 Magnum.  And let me tell you, a 6" barrelled revolver with one of those long, skinny scopes they used back then is a rather humorous combination--the scope was half again as long as the whole revolver.  I need to do a scan and trace of some of the pictures and stick some in here.  scot 14:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record holder
Talk:German Army Aviation Corps

message: I am thinking of reverting the changes made by Polybos as, in my opinion, they do not improve the legibility of the article and simply stretches it to unnecessary lengths. Furthermore, I do not think that each unit needs to be parsed into its smallest component but that this should be reserved for future articles on each unit. It also leads to the article consisting of ungainly long lists without any surplus value. Any comments? Ekki01 (talk) 16:17, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of list 
Talk:The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures

message: It seems as though it is the Wikipedia policy to accept a published translation , right or wrong, over an unpublished translation which is obviously correct. In the article Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals there is pressure to change the title word to Metaphysics because that is what someone saw in a published translation. This despite the fact that Kant's title uses the German word Metaphysik which obviously translates to Metaphysic, not Metaphysics. In this The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures article, I had to omit Kant's word Proved in the title. Kant used the German word erwiesen (Proved or Proven). This was done because the existing English translation did not include the word Proved. It is not taken into acccount that some translators change an author's words. In this case, the translator omitted the word Proved. In other cases, translators may add words. But the translator's published version is the one that is acceptable to Wikipedia. I suppose that this policy eliminates protracted arguments between editors who each have their own strong opinions.Lestrade 02:10, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles

message: A logical figure is a form of syllogism that depends on the relative position of the middle term.Lestrade (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Figure
Talk:Luftstreitkräfte

message: The official name of the Imperial German Army Air Service was "Deutsche Luftstreitkräfte", literally "German Airforce" and was founded in 1916. It consisted of the army airplanes, the army blimps, the AA, the army weather forecast and the Home defence. It had no command of the employment of forces in the field. It was primarily responsible for training and replacement. 132.230.129.192 10:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: * [Photo of Fokker crash 21-April 1916 [reference only}]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.53.145.47 (talk) 12:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fokker crash

message: German army and navy airships in WWI were "named" in the same way as destroyers and submarines - thus an airship "number" referred to an individual "ship" - not a type. Thus the various "airship designations" just don't belong here - it's something entirely different.--Soundofmusicals (talk) 01:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airship numbers 

message: If someone bilingual could supply better definitions, it would very probably be a good thing.
On the other hand, as the listings previously stood, they were minimally comprehensible. So I kludged in Babelfish translations as a stopgap.
Georgejdorner (talk) 11:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unit designations
Talk:Classical albedo features on Mars

message: When I created this page, I put the pronunciations in as an extra fillip.  They are not essential to the page.  Since they have become "controversial" due to the crusading zeal of a certain editor, I think it's better to take them out than continue reverting his replacement transcription, which is totally unacceptable as a guide to pronunciation. RandomCritic (talk) 01:43, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your opinion, which others may disagree with. If you would point out any actual errors, those could be corrected. kwami (talk) 04:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

text: The differences mostly boil down to conventions, such as whether the vowel of toe should be transcribed  or , which is a pretty silly thing to fight about. If it's that important to you, bring it up at MOS so that we can keep everything together here. There were a few actual differences in pronunciation as well, but I think I've checked most of them with the OED or other dictionaries. Let me know if I missed anything. — kwami (talk) 02:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: I believe the dark areas are mainly regions where the dust is cleared, revealing a dark rocky lag deposit. Though some of the dark patches may be depositional in nature, I think we should go with the majority of cases rather than the exceptions. I will change accordingly. Schaffman (talk) 12:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nature of the dark areas
Talk:Guatemalan Air Force

message: Just a quick note: The Guatemalan Air Force is no longer operating the Lockheed T-33 and the Douglas C-47 / DC-3 types. There are surviving examples of both but those are not in service.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.57.97.252 (talk) 20:58, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lockheed T-33 / Douglas C-47 

message: This article contains several negative POV and unreferenced statements. BatteryIncluded (talk) 02:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: I noticed my comments about the strange wording in the strategy section were removed. I will say again, I believe this section is either irrelevant, poorly constructed or both. It certainly isn't backed up by any citations or references. To say that the Guatemalan Air Force is unique because they are trained to circle around and attack from behind, is probably not true - this has likely been done by every air force since air forces were created. The concept of the "In Out In Out" strategy, to pull out to be substituted with another aircraft group, is probably not based in fact, considering most of the fleet is permanently grounded due to lack of maintanence. If you want to describe the F.A.G.'s strategy, we should go for a historical reference to what they actually have done in combat situations - perhaps their involvement in the Bay of Pigs Invasion, or something. Otherwise, I see no meaning or reason behind this section. MisplacedFate1313 (talk) 00:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. Besides, strategy in battle is in dynamic change. Deleted. -BatteryIncluded (talk) 02:41, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Strategy Section?

message: The article says there is an arms embargo on Guatemala. All I could find in thar regard is that Ronald Reagan overturned the arms embargo imposed on Guatemala by Carter in 1980. A lot has happened since then. Is there an embargo currently? I find no references to it. It may be deleted if nothing is found. -BatteryIncluded (talk) 02:47, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Embargo? 

message: I deleted the entry on the 6 Super Tucano aircraft "in order" because the President of Guatemala cancelled it:
.  He is shopping in Israel instead. -BatteryIncluded (talk) 20:46, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Tucano - cancelled
Talk:Guyana Defence Force

message: The Army Equipment section is in need of better sources and reformatting. ---EngineeringEditor (talk) 13:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Army Equipment section needing overhaul 

message: Noticed one sentence stating numbers that exceed the inventory table directly beneath it. 
Namely: The GDF currently operates 24 fixed-wing aircraft and 24 helicopters
Table count is much less. I understand its difficult to verify numbers but this seems like an easy fix.
Discuss?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D09:77F:7940:9093:30F9:8088:1731 (talk) 19:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Force Equipment section probable error 

message: Bro w  tha s.  Ai.  Dm. Ai 
dishes  c ti ta lo  y  in    I’m ail  ils  Moscone’s 
cer   A  et     Con  ail c    Cone     F de  
Enh  an  an     Te n   Ce  by our    Ce   Kind d   Of rs   Of e 
tr to  fire 2603:8000:8800:B090:9458:7D49:6543:8F7F (talk) 03:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milrgas