lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:River Cottage

message: Whoever has been vandalising the article, I suggest they stop. Let's not have to protect the entire Wikipedia, eh?
Berym 01:24, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: October 11 series is called River Cottage Veg
86.186.147.5 (talk) 19:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There have actually been a few series since the last one listed here.   See the River Cottage page on the Channel 4 website.  Nelliejellynoonaa (talk) 12:09, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Page needs updating 

message: Is this necessary?Patrick lovell (talk) 21:40, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bloopers 

message: Need to add "Pig in a day" to the list of videos.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.213.176.215 (talk) 21:27, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pig In A Day 

message: It has been proposed since September 2015 that River Cottage H.Q. be merged into this article, although there does not seem to have been a talk page discussion. These are clearly on the same topic and should be in a single place.--NHSavage (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually on reflection, I have been misled by the fact that this article starts River Cottage HQ is . In fact this article (unlike  River Cottage H.Q.) is about the whole River Cottage franchise, but it still makes sense to merge the other article here I think.--NHSavage (talk) 21:00, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  If there are no further comments by Saturday I will do the merge. --NHSavage (talk) 20:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I am trying to reorganise this article over at User:NHSavage/River_Cottage to bring some structure to it. Comments welcome.--NHSavage (talk) 21:39, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewrite completed.--NHSavage (talk) 18:32, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page for draft of rewrite 

message: Winchester river cottage kitchen has closed. Possibly needed to rewrite a few sections. edapm (talk) 11:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: All the original canteens/kitchens have closed. I’ve updated that section with citations. JimChampion (talk) 09:27, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed
Talk:Oberkommando des Heeres

message: Why does this article have a German title? Is there a style standard mandating this? I thought this was an English-language encyclopedia, and that articles should have English titles unless it would cause confusion. (I can see why the article on the Ivory Coast is called "Cote d'Ivoire", since the country's current leadership made a big deal out of insisting that no one should translate it, but the Nazis are not currently in power.) 
If no one objects, I'm planning to move the article to German Army High Command. Then I'll make a note that OKH refers to the German term. --Uncle Ed (talk) 19:29, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Give article an English name

message: "His command of the OKH however, led to disastrous defeats of the German Army in the Eastern Front, and soon on the Western Front." - This is an opinion, and not a fact. Maybe it should be deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vortalwombat (talk • contribs) 14:45, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: About Hitler's role
Talk:Oberkommando der Marine

message: We really need captions for these flags! Please help, Bapho 10:52, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why captions? The flags are explicitly described in the article.--Gomeira 23:07, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Flags

message: What we really need is a narrative which adds somethin serious to this article which now has few lines of flags.--Ukas (talk) 18:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not just flags

message: This article doesn't reflect the command structure of the OKM very well. This is a NSA document ], part of the TICOM document cache, which was declassified in 2008, and clearly shows the command structure of OKM in 1944. The ref document, only seems to show 1 SKL, which is operations and doesn't show anything related to the rest of the command structure.
scope_creep (talk) 10:42, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure Incorrect
Talk:Oberkommando der Luftwaffe

message: The Oberkommando der Luftwaffe is not the same as the Generalstab der Luftwaffe. The latter was only a part of it, and there has been a time where there was a Generalstab der Luftwaffe without an Oberkommando der Luftwaffe. Nevertheless, I'll try to add some details about the Generalstab der Luftwaffe to this article, just to avoid another article and at the same time enhance this one. (I have flags as one of my hobbies but this article should definitely carry more information than just flags.) Problem is that I have some material but nearly no time. Nevertheless, I'll see what I can do. One of the special tasks of the Generalstab der Luftwaffe was map-making. I am studying this topic, see my results to-date at http://milgeolw.vexilli.net (in German language, except one list) -- Wschroedter (talk) 20:00, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generalstab der Luftwaffe 

message: The "Organization" section begins with this:
:
5 February 1944 was much nearer the end of the war than the beginning and the Luftwaffe was on the ropes, so it makes little sense to consider this a key reorganization to prepare for the war. Also earlier in the article it says "In early 1937, Göring announced reorganization of the Reich Air Ministry into Military and civilian branches. The military branch was to be led by the Oberkommando der Luftwaffe". And at the end of the end of the article it lists Chiefs of OKL and Chiefs of the OKL General Staff as dating from 1935. So this is pretty confusing. The February 5 1944 date appears to be real, per Organization of the Luftwaffe (1933–45), but it's not clear in this article or that what happened. I'd fix this but I flat-out cannot understand what the deal was. Little help here? Herostratus (talk) 02:25, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is confusing
File talk:Factory.svg

message: This logo looks very similar to the Factory Records logo.--Dubkiller 06:00, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: um, guys, it's a classic isotype. --Mr.98 (talk) 01:17, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

message: It's completely invisible when you use it with the "Use a black background with green text on the Monobook" gadget option in Preferences: maybe it should have some colour? cojoco (talk) 23:15, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: It's invisible
Talk:List of programs broadcast by Spike

message: Hope this follows quality standards.  This list kept getting deleted from the Spike TV article, though I believe it is important to have a list of this nature available, since there are several shows that were originally first shown on this network that are now no longer on television at all, including several animated series, and some imports. -Nobuyuki 06:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Googleing "Voyager" on spiketv.com  doesn't return any hits. Is this a problem with my Google skills, or should Voyager be removed from the list? Golwengaud 19:22, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voyager? 

message: Where is it? It was definitely on TNN (formerly Spike TV). It used to be on Friday nights with Monster Jam, and Rollerjam. It was like all sports night. http://www.bsu.edu/news/article/0,1370,1110--,00.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.203.12.146 (talk) 01:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rockin Bowl

message: i don't see it listed here on the Spike TV programing but there's a show called 1,000 ways to die. can we have that added to the list.--Boutitbenza 69 9 (talk) 01:25, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1,000 Ways To Die

message: Original programming should be separated from syndicated shows. I'm not gonna do it, but you should! Nova Prime (talk) 10:14, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto. Baywatch - clearly not a Nashville Network original programme, has been dumped into a large, unreferenced list alongside Blue Mountain State, a show deserves greater visibility on this page due to its status as a Spike TV original. Same issue with the Spike TV infobox. Rayman60 (talk) 17:43, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate sections 

message: why isn't knockout sportsworld listed--76.94.173.73 (talk) 05:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  knockout sportsworld 

message: Is there any reason why Urban Tarzan is not listed, and is there any reason why there is no page for Urban Tarzan?
69.250.124.100 (talk) 00:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I created a page for Urban Tarzan, but it will probably need some tidying up. allixpeeke (talk) 19:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Said page was removed; thus, if someone wants to give it another go, be my guest. allixpeeke (talk) 18:49, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urban Tarzan 

message: The tv show The Shannara Chronicles is listed as part of "Reality/non-scripted programs" of the channel, though it is a scripted tv show.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.226.165.55 (talk) 13:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Shannara Chronicles
Talk:Subhan Allah

message: In editing the article, shouldn't we:
A. Include various/different explanations, as opposed to just deleting the previous explanation for the phrase as was done by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/85.231.154.30?  I'm not sure if we want just a single explanation for the phrase.  I would like to include the explanation from ar-Razi as well as others.
B. Or if you think there is only ONE explanation then as I understand it, understanding Quranic terminology (Word of Allah) can only be done through taking the root of the derivative verbs and explain these derivatives in the shade of the root, as is done in the classical technique.  These roots can only be explained by their occurance elsewhere in the Quran, as opposed to using a dictionary of the Arabic language (which is constantly evolving and changing) or expounding upon a scholar's opinion who has not used the classical technique.  I'm unaware of whether or not ar-Razi used this classical technique.  
C In addition, we can include a blurb about the source of this term (Quranic) and HOW the revelation is to be defined?
I think that this wiki entry could/should be greatly expanded.Furtfurt (talk) 21:49, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different explanations 

message: Subhan Allah is the same as Tasbih; Subhanah, Yusabbihu, Sabbaha - just conjugations from a root. No need for a separate article.--130.88.103.117 (talk) 13:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Leo1pard (talk) 05:23, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Shraga Feivish Hager

message: The Kosover Rebbe's shul is on 52nd and 11th.  His Tish Hall is in the Satmar building.--Meshulam 06:20, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure if this is encyclopedic; but the shul on 52nd is the shul of Rabbi Shraga Feivish's father and presently the shul of Rabbi Shraga Feivish's younger brother, while Rabbi Shraga Feivish's shul (and Tish Hall) is currently on 55th between 13 & 14. -- -- -- 19:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gornitzky & Co.

message: May there be any copyright violations in the last two edits by 213.8.44.227?
See:
Link 1 Link 2
Elite compact 06:29, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyright violation? 
Talk:Missile boat

message: Please merge this article with Fast Attack Craft or split the ship classes cleanly between them. Hcobb (talk) 16:52, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge or split please 

message: Following on from the Merge discussion (here, and over there) I have summarized the information on missile boats in the Fast Attack Craft article and moved the excess here. So now this article can focus on the missile boat as a distinct type, as the Torpedo boat and Motor torpedo boat articles do. I trust that is OK with everyone. Xyl 54 (talk) 18:57, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes
Talk:Milosh

message: Just curious, does this require it's own section? I feel like this could be part of a "personal life section". I know that Woody Allen's page doesn't have a much-needed sexual assault section. Lettherebelegos (talk) 07:45, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexual Assault Allegations
Talk:United States Army Infantry School

message: This article should be sublimated into the article on Fort Benning.
*SSG Cornelius Seon (Retired) 11:26, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Sublimation

message: I can see no reason why this article needs immediate attention. Please, if you attach such a tag, say why.
Cheers
Buckshot06 02:50, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed immediate attention tag

message: How come John Garang, future Southern Sudan rebel leader, received an education there in Georgia as member of Sudan's military in the 1970s? Where other leaders from genocidal dictatorships also trained? It needn't be put this polemically, but it sure deserves further enquiry, i guess.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lhoaxt (talk • contribs) 15:38, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Training of Foreign Soldiers

message: For the List of Chief of Infantry section, here is a non-reliable source, source:
*theworldsmilitaryhistory wiki
--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 15:46, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  non reliable source source 

message: The quote "creating the best trained and highly equipped infantrymen" is POV. I have removed it. Coin Collecting John (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:Lodovico Zacconi

message: The article Lucovico Zacconi contains less information than the article on Lodovico Zacconi. I may be wrong, but as far as I can tell they are the same person. RedZebra 06:59, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lucovico vs Lodovico

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  The article is B-class, but I suspect more can be written about the man and his work.  The full review is on the comments page; questions and comments can be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 01:36, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Levante UD

message: What is this paragraph referring to? 
"After gaining promotion, Levante had a positive start to the season, quickly gathering several points to challenge among the top ten for the first half of their season. But things went suddenly downhill as the season went on. A poor run of form saw them slip alarmingly down the pecking order until they found themselves needing a win to stay up on the last day. They didn't get it, and were relegated straight back down again, a surprise considering their earlier form."
The article earlier says they were only in the first division in the 60s, so what is this paragraph about?  --Awiseman 07:04, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing paragraph

message: It´s strange that Peguy Luyindula has is profile for the new season in his club(Marsille),but doesn´t have it in Levante´s site? Where does he really is?-Tiago Heitor 12:04, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Does Luyindula really are in Levante?

message: I have removed the list of recent transfers, as Wikipedia is not a news service. Oldelpaso 11:50, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If there are transfers in or out, can someone please provide sources when they either add or delete a player from the roster. The Levante official site is probably the best place to get those links. As it stands, there is some confusion over who is where, so sticking to what the club officially says (it's current squad list) is best. Isaiah 17:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added/updated the in/out section mostly using www.soccer-spain.com, but have a problem with where I should put the actual references (as you can see on this page history). Any suggestions, or do I have to put a note after every single player? Sebisthlm 18:40, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Transfers

message: What does this sentence mean?  "The quarry is currently developing its role in Buñol Sports City, but it should be noted that the quarry played for years in the Malvarrosa, leaving left field."
If you put it here in Spanish, or link to a news article, I will help you translate it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mweisenfeld (talk • contribs) 20:58, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quarry 
Talk:Designated marksman rifle

message: This page should be redirected to Designated marksman that is a comprehensive article listing all of the US types of designated marksman rifles (where this article only mentions 2) and it also describes the concept in full detail (which this article makes a passing attempt at).  This article is effectively just a duplicate. Deon Steyn 07:13, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there should be two articles, but right now there isn't enough content to justify it and it's better for the user to get a redirect to the DM article. Implementing the merge.--Mmx1 01:36, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: Can someone please redirect marksman rifle to this article. 108.38.126.227 (talk) 09:38, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Croatian months

message: i would delete the latin column. English is sufficient. Same in Czech months and Polish months. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 23:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin 

message: I can't understand what citation is needed for the croatian meening column. I'm Bulgarian and I completely understand the meaning of the names even if in modern Bulgarian those slavic names of the months are not preserved.Perhaps a citation may be needed on the ethimology of "veljača", but I think the others are quite clear for slavic speaking people.Asking a citation for this is like asking for citation on the meaning of "day" and "night" :s --SOMNIVM 10:21, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed for croatian meaning?! 
Talk:Batman Jones

message: I can't believe this article is still alive.  Ha!  Ichormosquito (talk) 02:25, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FICT]]
Talk:Abelmoschus

message: http://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=gn&name=Abelmoschus states that 3 species are Australian. Peter1968 07:25, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Australian species

message: Abelmoschus means "white musk" and refers to a major component of the aroma produced by the seeds. This Article is in sore need of help as so far it makes no mention whatsoever of any aroma or the fact that the seeds have been treasured for centuries as one of very few sources in the plant kingdom of an aroma in the category perfumers and flavorists describe as convincingly musk-like. There is a long tradition of use of these seeds in perfumery and flavoring. In India the seeds are used to flavor coffee and in the production of fragrant oils for personal adornment and incense.
Mykstor (talk) 16:10, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: How embarrassing that, after several years, this information was never added! 173.89.236.187 (talk) 00:34, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning of "Abelmoschus" and aroma
Talk:Tele Atlas

message: The highest resolution picture available on Google Earth, which is of the google campus, is taken by TeleAtlas. Chaotic Mind 07:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worth mentioning?  

message: This sentence is incomprehensible to me:
* "Company is provided the 25% quality in their geospatial database."
Should it be deleted? Acwilson9 (talk) 06:18, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cryptic text 

message: Does Tele Atlas still exist?  Nothing in the article is less than 12 years old. Acwilson9 (talk) 06:20, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stale material?
Talk:Sybil Fawlty

message: I'm reverting back my edits about Sybil (1) only being lazy "at times" (I disagree that she cares little about running the hotel); and (2) that she stays cool in a crisis (which we see many times: preparing food in Gourmet Night and Waldorf Salad, cleaning up in Basil The Rat, handling Mr. Leeman's friends. I'm prepared to go with the majority but I think my assessment is accurate. I'm starting this topic here so we can discuss, because I don't want an edit war to start. Rocksong 01:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, good analysis. You should join the wikiproject, you've contributed to the articles far greater in comparison to the members of the project: I'm starting to think they can't be bothered Foxearth 08:55, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. Don't get too worried about lack of contributions. If they're like me, they work in bursts. Also, you've done a lot of work and maybe some people can't see how to improve it. Rocksong 00:13, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Sybil was lazy in the sense that she delegated all the time and rarely did anything herself. She also frequently went out to see friends or get a hair cut, leaving Basil to do what he did best (make a mess, wind up guests, connive with Polly, abuse Manuel and confuse the Major). LoveEverybodyUnconditionally (talk) 15:08, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sybil's personality
Talk:Polly Sherman

message: I could have sworn it was Sherman, but I may be wrong... --Alex9891 (talk) 12:03, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shearman 

message: I propose restoring the article for Polly Sherman.  Basil Fawlty, Sybil Fawlty and Manuel all have their own articles.  It seems out of place that Polly would not have a separate article when the other main characters do.
Polly previously had , curated by a number of editors including Cacolantern, Grieferhate, IJVin and Davidhorman, and IPs 68.146.8.46, 195.194.223.25 and 94.14.148.113.
It was  by The JPS in 2009 and  by AnemoneProjectors in 2013, apparently without prior discussion, substituted with a redirect to the Fawlty Towers article, which includes a character summary; it was previously.
Another source to build on the character development is this discussion by John Cleese, from the BBC, accessible here.
If anyone has any comments or objections, please discuss them here.  —sroc 💬 17:00, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: OK with me, particularly as Major Gowan and the Misses (together) each have their own page. Though there is a page Polly Sherman, but the template does not go to it, having a redirect instead! Just get rid of the redirect! Hugo999 (talk) 05:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Hugo999.  I've corrected the redirect Polly Sherman (Fawlty Towers) → Polly Sherman and updated the template box now.  —sroc 💬 06:39, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate article for Polly?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Jointness (second nomination)

message: The article about Jointness should not be completely deleted, rather, it should be summed up in fewer sentences.  In the first nomination for its deletion, the sole reason it was nominated was because it was linked to three other entries all of which cited material by a single author and therefore deleted for orignial research.  Jointness is a well known terminology used by many countries; it is definitely not original research or a Non-notable neologism.  If you search the phrase on google, you will get thousands of entires.  I do not understand how this material does not meet the relevant content criteria for Wikipedia and I do not think it needs to be completely deleted. --AvivaS 07:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)