Talk:Danity Kane

message: Validation of article performed by WIKICHECK. August 16 2006 5:52pm. WikiCheck 17:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: WHO edited the "members" section in the introduction of the page?  Currently, it lists only "Shannon Bex, Dawn Richards, and Aundrea Fimbres" as members.  Where did Aubrey and D.Woods' names go?  there's no cite for this change.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.98.218 (talk) 02:04, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  STOP! 

message: What would Dawn be considered. An alto, contralto, or mezzo-soprano?
Dawn is an alto sporano because of her 7 octave vocal range.
I don't think Dawn has a seven octave vocal range. In the show, it was revealed that she was having trouble reaching some notes because of her low vocal range. I think she would be a contralto.
Although a 7 octave voice is possibly, it is most ridiculous for Dawn. As said above, she did struggle on an episode to reach some notes. I would say the largest range that is could have is F2 - C6. She has a really really low voice as shown in the song "Still In Love.". She is possibly a Baritone to Mezzo-Soprano; maybe beyond.
Dawn is a contralto. It is impossible for her to be classified a person with a 7 octave voice because her lowest notes are in the 2nd octave, possibly F2, and in order for her to have a 7 octave range, she would hav to be able to sing into the ninth octave. She will have to be able to hit whistle register notes higher than even Mariah's whistle. For the most I will say that she has a 3-4 octave voice. It is ridiculous to even consider that she can hav a 7 octave voice without substantial evidence. (Trent Jones 18:58, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dawn's Vocal Classification 

message: I edited the part where it was stated the the band was formed on the third season of Making the Band, because really the band was formed on the second season of Making the Band 3.TPREX 18:05, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Season 3

message: The article shouldn't be a list for fansites. Should they be deleted or kept? mirageinred 20:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fan sites.. Delete or keep?

message: Who keeps on removing the "Controversy" rumors I posted about DK breaking up? Please stop removing this, this is an actual rumor about the band breaking up and has been reported by MediaTakeOut.com.
If you are the one deleting the "Controversy" section, please tell me why, if not, I will continue to add it again. Sorry.
-In response to the above unsigned comment -
 I think it is someone involved in their careers who has put this page together. That comes with 
benefits like in-depth information and photos being provided, but it looks like they are savvy enough
 to keep an eye on their Wiki. The page looks written in a style that PR might use. I am not saying the 
page's creator is deleting your comments but it does seem plausible. 
I have no idea what's going on with the formatting on this discussion page though!
--Spesek 02:01, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: There are too many people who hate to see people make it. Alot of them are attacking these hard-working girls. STOP HATING and deleting information about them. Just because your life is a lie doesn't mean Danity Kane's History is one also. If you think Danity Kane sucks; keep it to yourself. Don't hate. Its a waste of time and energy.Blueandgold200 04:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Too Many Hater

message: bla lalkdsjalsklsaknfslnfsasfdg
Dislike of someone is no reason to revert them. Sort yourselves out. Adam Cuerden talk 11:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit War 

message: 
I would like to add :Image:20060909 Danity Kane Chicago Signing (2).JPG to the infobox. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 14:51, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not at all related to the edit war, so done! Adam Cuerden talk 16:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: There's been a load of unsourced edits recently about two of the members, Aubrey and Wanita, leaving. I thought I'd bring this to the talk page in case this is valid, or if it's just nonsense. I haven't heard anything about this, and a bunch of edits related to their leaving have been made. Acalamari 23:56, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Members left? 

message: "Kicked across the table" - is that some kind of slang? Also, the article says 7 girls were chosen just before it says 11 remains. Needs a tidy by someone who knows the facts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.176.103 (talk) 01:16, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Kicked across the table" should be changed to a more meaningful phrase ... I have no idea what it means here.Kww (talk) 02:13, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Laughing out loud. I changed "kicked across the table" some days ago. That was definitely some of the worst wording I have ever seen. Flyer22 (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The other part I did not even have to correct; it's been corrected for some time now. Flyer22 (talk) 12:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slang 

message: In the main box where the stats for Danity Kane are, there is the members section and the former members section. In the former members section it has D and Aubrey's name with, "(2005-September 2008)". I have a problem with that.
1. No other Wikipedia pages of this kind have the month of breakup on there.
2. The breakup was previously recorded. We are not specifically sure what month it actually happened.
3. Because of #2^, People will make guesses and it could be changed week after week, day after day, OR it will be left there, giving people false information.
I would change this myself, but I need to get feedback on this. Plus if someone decides to try to change it back, they will understand why it was changed in the first place.
IHelpWhenICan (talk) 03:05, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Breakup Date!!!!!!!!! and other suggested inprovements 

message: Yes, I did see the page on it at perezhilton.com BUT no one has added that to the article so until then, I'm gonna change the bar at the bottom of Danity Kane articles to show Shannon's in the group. I'M NOT JUST CHANGING STUFF, BUT I'M REVERTING THINGS THAT AREN'T CITED OR CONSIST OF PEOPLES OPINION AND NOT FACT.
Thank You.
IHelpWhenICan (talk) 03:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shannon Breaking From Group. 

message: Does anyone else think the 'departure of Aubrey and D.Woods' section is a little too long? CandiceWalsh (talk) 18:20, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I say we do need it all. All of it is vital information to the breakup of this group, and it is sourced (most with good references). I cannot see any good reason why it should be condensed. There are longer sections in articles on Wikipedia, but are also appropriately long. This section we are discussing is of appropriate length, and I do not see it as that long, anyway. It's not like it has gotten to the length of being devided into subsections yet. Flyer22 (talk) 23:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Departure... 

message: I have removed where it said former WWE guru and replaced it with ECW in regards to Paul Heyman as he was by no means a WWE "guru." He had regular friction with Stephanie McMahon and many of his ideas were shot down by her.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.201.174.45 (talk) 01:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference says "WWE guru"...we have to go with the reference, or remove mention of him being a guru at all and rather state his connection to the ECW. Flyer22 (talk) 23:13, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Paul Heyman comment

message: I had this idea because it would put the sections in order. Why dont we add the albums to the "History" section along with MTB and add the breakup as a sub-section to Welcome to the Dollhouse? It has been done to articles in the past. Think, It Danity Kane continues, that album section will grow. Then after the album section "Departure of D. Woods and Aubrey O Day"? Thats out of chronological order. Well I'll put the version in my sandbox. Find it at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:IHelpWhenICan/Sandbox.IHelpWhenICan (talk) 23:58, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. Not a bad proposal. Flyer22 (talk) 06:24, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of article proposal 

message: I note that several times, the picture :Image:20060909 Danity Kane Chicago Signing (2).JPG has been replaced several times due to band members no longer being part of the group. However, they have been replaced with fair-use images, which are not free, while 20060909 Danity Kane Chicago Signing (2).JPG is free. As far as I'm aware, free images are not supposed to be replaced by fair-use images, hence the restoring of the free image. Are there any free images of the current line-up of Danity Kane available, rather than fair-use? Acalamari 00:14, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current image 

message: Where has it been stated that their 3rd album is "From the Ashes?"  CITE THINGS PEOPLE!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.83.210 (talk) 05:41, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FROM THE ASHES? 

message: Some of the sections need to be revised and gone over, esp. "Departure of Aubrey O Day and D. Woods". The information seems out of order. This is because I reformed the article a while back. I didn't change the text within because, well, then you couldn't call it a minor edit. But before I rearranged it, I did put up my idea on the talk page and I recieved positive feedback. Anyway maybe we should split the section into 2 sections, one called "Break-up Rumors" This could enter as a sub section of the "Danity Kane" era and then have the actual break-up info as a sub section to the "Welcome to the Dollhouse" era.IHelpWhenICan (talk) 03:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I took the liberty of doing the suggestion mentioned above and putting the content of the article into chronological order. Hopefully, all the information makes much more sense in its relation to the section it is featured in. TJ 22:58, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't believe you changed the article..everyone specifically was saying "NO!"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.83.210 (talk) 23:26, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

text: where did the picture go to go along with the section. i thought it made it look more aestheically pleaseing  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.9.41.222 (talk) 23:54, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reforming the article. 

message: Why was my link deleted. Shannon is no longer in the group.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oneshyguy46 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There was a whole bunch of news a while back saying Shannon was leaving, but then she released a statement saying she was still in the group. They deleted it because it was one big rumor...IHelpWhenICan (talk) 04:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

text: F.Y.I. People, PLEASE GET AN ACCOUNT IF YOU PLAN ON EDITING!!!! A LOT OF YOU MAKE MISTAKES, THEN WE TRY TO TELL YOU, BUT YOU DON'T HAVE AN ACCOUNT SO WE CAN'T TELL YOU!!!! THEN YOU MAKE THE SAME MISTAKES OVER AND OVER AGAIN!!!!!!! IT'S NOT THAT HARD, AND IT'S FREE!!!!! GET AN ACCOUNT TODAY!!!IHelpWhenICan (talk) 04:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Departure of Shannon 

message: People keep making changes to this section using reference 32 when the reference doesn't any of that! If everyone agrees, I will search for the correct version in the archives and put in for the section. DO NOT "TAKE THE LIBERTY" OF DOING IT YOURSELF! You might do it wrong, or you don't understand what I mean! Please leave responses to this telling me what to do. IHelpWhenICan (talk) 02:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Current activities: The future of Danity Kane" section

message: This article has been vandalized by random people every other day and it's getting on my nerves and probably yours too. So, what I suggest is that we semi-protect this page.
*F.Y.I. Semi-protection=only autoconfirmed users can edit this page.
Don't worry! Pretty much every user that doesn't vandalize pages are. Let me know and let me know fast. I will put out the request. Please dont do it for me or tell me when you do. IHelpWhenICan (talk) 20:29, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-protection?

message: Danity Kane is still a group I know these things because 
1. look at the trailer they're altogether just shannon, dawn, and aundrea. 
2. If you look at the first episode real carefully Day26 has a concert in london it says October 26, 2008 or something like that well Danity Kane was at the Jet night club Nov. 15, 2008
They are just trying to keep this hush hush so more views on MTB but Danity Kane is a group watch the video.
:FYI, unless it is a confirmed by a valid source that they are still a group, we cannot put that. Flyer22 (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FYI

message: I contributed a little to the Danity Kane article I found that it was valid seeing as how all members will be at the finale and if it is really the end. SO no deletion, very valid. Thanks!Icevirgo99 (talk) 02:21, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't understand. It is not cited, therefore it holds no weight, at all. There is no proof that they have reconciled at all. IF IT IS NOT CITED, DON'T BOTHER. The proof comes on tonight at 9. We don't write random rumors here at Wikipedia. We write the truth, cited and all. You can't believe everything you hear. You can write whatever, as long as it's cited by a reputable source. For example, I had a very reliable resource saying that D would not be returning. You know why it's not in there? IT WAS ON MYSPACE (BLACKLISTED URL). But you know what? I lived with it. Therefore, the whole point of my paragraph is to tell you, If it was true, the news would have picked up on it by now. IHelpWhenICan (talk) 20:51, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As we know, turns out Icevirgo99 was wrong about a third Danity Kane album anyway. Flyer22 (talk) 06:13, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Added a Little bit and From the Ashes 3rd album data

message: I am confused about this edit and recent similar ones adding a non-existent image to the article as well as stating that they are still active. I am also confused about this and other strange edits to the Danity Kane articles. I have done some searches and have found nothing to confirm the band coming back together. Is there anything I am missing or is this just vandalism? Acalamari 16:44, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reforming and other edits 

message: I should have started this days ago, but the Aundrea issue needs to be straightened out. I don't mean to come in and act like I'm on my high horse and all, but a current group member means a member that is active with the group. Something that Aundrea is doing. It doesn't matter if she announced that she is leaving, that doesn't mean she is not longer part of the group at the exact moment unless explicitly stated, and it doesn't matter if she is not featured on Lemonade. It's been fairly obvious and confirmed that she will be completing the No Filter tour - aka being active with the group. It was even confirmed that Aundrea was at the recording sessions for Lemonade even if she isn't featured on it. This shouldn't even be a heated issue. The tour ends in one week and then she will leave. Until June 5, she is a current member of the group. --Shadow (talk) 06:38, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aundrea's Status 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Danity Kane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071012154630/http://aubreyoday.us:80/index.php?subaction=showcomments&id=1184312211&archive=&start_from=&ucat=7,12& to http://aubreyoday.us/index.php?subaction=showcomments&id=1184312211&archive=&start_from=&ucat=7,12&
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090427164652/http://www.gossipgirls.com:80/aubrey-o039day/danity-kane-girls-get-together-solve-nothing-293978 to http://www.gossipgirls.com/aubrey-o039day/danity-kane-girls-get-together-solve-nothing-293978
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:13, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Danity Kane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080921234203/http://www.blender.com:80/guide/articles.aspx?id=1726 to http://www.blender.com/guide/articles.aspx?id=1726
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090212091709/http://dawnrichard.org:80/displayimage.php?album=334&pos=0 to http://dawnrichard.org/displayimage.php?album=334&pos=0
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131029195032/http://www.rapweekly.com/news.asp?id=3261 to http://www.rapweekly.com/news.asp?id=3261
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Danity Kane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081013212828/http://beta.kiwibox.com:80/article/36826 to http://beta.kiwibox.com/article/36826
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121026080923/http://www.mtv.com/videos/making-the-band-4-season-3-ep-12-how-you-gonna-fix-it to http://www.mtv.com/videos/making-the-band-4-season-3-ep-12-how-you-gonna-fix-it
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:58, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Substituted at 12:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: I reverted these changes by  because, like I stated, "The lead image should be the image of the entire group, which is what they were more well known as. They are not as well known as a trio, and the reunion was a bust." I made this followup edit afterward. For the lead image, I do not see how it is an improvement to present the trio as the group. If the group were currently a trio, I would be open to that image as the lead image. But, as of right now, this group is over, and their success came with all five, not three. I feel the same way about changing the lineup.   
Acalamari, any thoughts on this? Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 01:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your rationale for keeping the image with the five of them. Danity Kane is gone and their success came as the five, as you've said. We don't have to use newer images for the sake of it when an older image is more illustrative. Acalamari 21:31, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Acalamari. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 22:36, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest changes 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Danity Kane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070618131213/http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/riaa/index.jsp to http://billboard.com/bbcom/riaa/index.jsp
*Added  tag to http://www.gnextinc.com/bbo/news/introdanitykane.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070618131213/http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/riaa/index.jsp to http://billboard.com/bbcom/riaa/index.jsp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://aubreyoday.us/index.php?subaction=showcomments&id=1184312211&archive=&start_from=&ucat=7%2C12&
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081016143610/http://www.usmagazine.com/news/why-aubrey-o-day-was-kicked-out-of-danity-kane to http://www.usmagazine.com/news/why-aubrey-o-day-was-kicked-out-of-danity-kane
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:49, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified