lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bordesley railway station

message: Perhaps this staiton can be considered a special purpose station alongside IBM railway station, British Steel Redcar, Lympstone Commando railway station and Manchester United FC Halt?
Obviously it doesn't really fulfill the criteria based on the first three, but like MUFC's halt, only has trains call there on matchdays... so I think it is a contender for the role? Worley-d (talk) 17:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose 

message: Can anyone prove the station is actually locked on non-train days? As I'm sure I've been there when it hasn't been a Saturday and it has been unlocked. Martin H. Heron (talk) 18:14, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Difficult to "prove", but since most stations will be closed on days when there is no service, the statement seems to be unnecessary and I have removed it.--Shantavira|feed me 09:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station locked? 

message: I removed the image request as we have an image. If anyone thinks we need a more up-to-date one, message me and I'll nip down there are take a snap.--Shantavira|feed me 09:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Image request removed

message: “Duddeston Viaduct“ redirects here, but the term does not make an appearance in the text. Either some mention should be made, or the redirect should be removed. Jim (talk) 05:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , I've edited the redirect to another page where some description is given of it. Hope that helps. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! That’s helpful. Jim (talk) 19:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

text: I mean, if you can prove it can pass WP:GNG with extensive sources, then sure. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 04:05, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duddeston Viaduct
Talk:Renoir (surname)

message: Jean Renoir (the movie director son of Pierre-Auguste Renoir) was as innovative and famous in his field as the painter was in his. I believe he should be included in the "Renoir (Surname)" page for that reason. Perhaps Pierre and Claude should not, but Jean definitely should.
I did not clarify any source documents for the other writer regarding the two Gabrielle Renoirs since neither has achieved the noteworthiness of being included in Wikipedia. I felt it was a moot point, though both were born in France.  Perhaps that's why the writer's search has yielded no results.  French birth certificates can only be obtained in person and by an immediate family member.  There is no evidence that anyone outside the family has adopted the name.
Thank you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiWriterandEditor (talk • contribs) 17:25, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems to me that the painter has both primacy and the most notability of any of the Renoirs listed here.  Would it not make sense to redirect Renoir to Pierre-Auguste Renoir and place there a hatnote saying Renoir redirect here.  For other individuals named Renoir, see Renoir (disambiguation)?  I'll be bold and make the change.  If anyone can think of a good reason for reverting it, please bring it up for discussion.  Robert K S (talk) 08:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be moved to [[Renoir (disambiguation)]]? 

message: User has introduced language into article stating that all individuals named Renoir are related to Pierre Auguste Renoir.  Have requested source for this assertion.  Would ask that other users not delete tags calling for references until such have been provided.  If no reference is forthcoming,  believe the proper path forward is to delete the passage, not the tag.  Comments? Hiernonymous (talk) 20:29, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: While we don't have an article on Claude Renoir (1901-69) as yet, he should be listed on the disamb page to avoid confusion. I have added citations to the article on Claude (1913/14-93) and an explanation to the article on Pierre (1885-1952) with the same citations. Since parenthesis on the two Claude Renoirs will only be applied when a second article is added, viz (producer) and (cinematographer), I have not used the standard practice to distinguish them. Philip Cross (talk) 20:24, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship of persons named Renoir 

message: I deleted a bunch of unsourced material which also had other problems.  It should be sourced before being re-inserted. See the WP:CITE page, especially on inline citations BE——Critical__Talk 19:55, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted material
Talk:Jewellery Quarter station

message: Fences are shown in the picture between the railway platform and the tram stop. Is there any fare gates or validators in between them, or is it like Stratford and Barking stations in London, that the fare systems are integrated? 14.0.208.42 (talk) 18:49, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Intermodal transfer
Talk:Sandwell & Dudley railway station

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 16:42, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sandwell and Dudley railway station →  – Station is named Sandwell & Dudley, not Sandwell and Dudley. While as often is the case, there is a degree of interchangeability in sources, all official organisations use the ampersand; National Rail, both operators that serve it, Avanti West Coast and West Midlands Railway, their predecessors Virgin Trains and London Midland, and Transport for West Midlands That is reinforced by the station signs that all use the ampersand.
 
Convention is to use the ampersand if this is reflected in the station signs, hence we have , ,  etc. Relevant policy is MOS:&. Rossonwy (talk) 05:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 September 2022
Talk:Dudley Port railway station

message: I made this!--Wipsenade (talk) 14:22, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

message: this needs a complete rewrite;  I'll go ahead with this soon unless I get some comments here.  Thanks Flying Stag (talk) 15:28, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Low Level station 
Talk:Great Bridge North railway station

message: I illistrated this article!--Wipsenade (talk) 16:56, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Bundle of rights

message: I came here looking for the basic Six Bundle of Rights in re to real property. Now where do I have to go to find them? Nannygoatstrut (talk) 23:37, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first part of the lead contains text apparently copied verbatim from De Witt Law Firm, The Bundle Of Legal Rights User:Rus793|Talk? 15:55, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issues
Talk:Bescot Stadium railway station

message: British History Online reckons that the site of the original Bescot Bridge station on the Grand Junction Railway was just up the road at the site of Wood Green station.  Rail around Birmingham and the West Midlands reckons that Bescot Bridge station was located at the site of Bescot Stadium.
The earliest mapping I can find for the area is 1889, which is unhelpful, although Bescot Stadium is marked as "Bescot Junction" and appears to be off the beaten track a little, whilst Wood Green is on the main Walsall to Wednesbury road, which seems like a much more logical place to put an early station.
Does anyone know which source is correct? Fingerpuppet 05:57, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ive reverted recent edits by User:Redrose64 which say this station opened in in 1937, when that is the date for the nearby Wood Green station station. Sadly even otherwise good sources seem to conflate the two. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 08:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Bescot Bridge Station

message: We have 1990 for this in the body, but 1991 in the infobox. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 10:04, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renamed as 'Stadium'
Talk:Brownhills railway station

message: I suggest that this page should be moved to the simple Brownhills railway station, as the (SSR) isn't necessary.  The other Brownhills station was also known as Brownhills Watling Street railway station, so there is sufficient disambiguation without needing the line name. Fingerpuppet 15:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested page move
Talk:Hamstead railway station

message: I've done a bit of research into this. The best information I can find is between 1970 and 1977. The Ian Allen Rail Atlas 1970 (ISNB 0-7110-2965-2) shows Great Barr, but by 1977 it had certainly changed to Hamstead, as this is how it is shown in the first edition of Baker's Rail Atlas (ISBN 86093 009 2) published that year. I'll keep looking to see if I can find anything else. – Tivedshambo (talk) 16:58, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of renaming 

message: By accident I've made this revert, abd because I feel unable to decide what's really better I reverted myself. Could please someone who has better knowledge of this topic review the change? Thanks in advance, abf /talk to me/ 14:31, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert
Talk:Lichfield Trent Valley railway station

message: I suggest removing the narrative and photo related to the spur line between low and high level lines, this has now been taken out of use as part of the station alterations. -- Jschwa1 (talk) 22:42, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There have been too many trivial changes to the "Services" section, as described at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject UK Railways#IP adding timetable information. Accordingly, I've restored that section to how it was on 13 July 2014, and I've applied a 1-week full protection to this page. Any changes to the Services section need to be discussed here, and references provided. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:55, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected

message: There is still a few services to and from Crewe via Northampton. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.224.250.139 (talk) 20:57, 20 August 2014‎
:What are your sources? --Redrose64 (talk) 22:43, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Services 
Talk:Tamworth railway station

message: Could some good person amend the data to include this service, operated by an Avanti Voyager? 2A00:23C6:1047:1A01:21AE:D236:4505:A1BA (talk) 18:56, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I train per day Mon to Fri from Chester to London Euston calling at Crewe, Lichfield Trent Valley and Tamworth (10.22) only.
Talk:Rugeley Trent Valley railway station

message: In the infobox it says that this station is managed by West Midlands Railway (the brand) rather than West Midlands Trains (the company behind the West Midlands Railway and London Northwestern Railway brands) like it does in the services section. The station signs are branded London Northwestern Railway. 51.7.117.215 (talk) 01:22, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Managed by West Midlands Railway?
Talk:Kidderminster railway station

message: The latest edition of The Shuttle mentioned improvements to the current station building at Kidderminster (already present in this article), as well as proposals for a Kidderminster Parkway station to the north of the town (although this was dismissed a few years ago out of fears of making Blakedown railway station redundant) and a Stourport Parkway station to the south of the town which would presumably be located between Kidderminster and Hartlebury railway station. Is it worth mentioning in this article? --Beeurd (talk) 18:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service improvement plans for Kidderminster area 

message: The view seen in the current one has been altered substantially by the construction of the footbridge. 86.136.251.177 (talk) 02:03, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could do with a new photo
Talk:Malvern Link railway station

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for Malvern Link 52.12581,-2.31955 — 90.192.9.117 (talk) 20:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 17:28, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: I came here because this article had been flagged in a project page as the subject of a PROD.  Many much less significant stations have articles, also many defunct ones.  There is thus no reason for not retaining this one.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:11, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: My main difficulty with the article is with the form of the succession box, which implies that there are two lines through the station, whereas there is only one line but used by two services.  Since this is set up from a special "rail line" template rather than the standard "s-start" series, I do not know how to rectify this.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: (a) all railway stations in Great Britain which are open should have their own articles (even one-train-a-week stations like ), so the PROD was unjustified; (b) . --Redrose64 (talk) 15:49, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD 
Talk:Great Malvern railway station

message: This is a listed building. Althopugh the bias of railway  station  articles is usually  on what  lines they  are served by, Malvern station  is a building  with  some history. I'm surprised to  see none of this remarked upon.--Kudpung (talk) 14:02, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listed
Talk:Barnt Green railway station

message: One or two  minor issues may  need lookig  at, including  a possible rewording for a more neutral text to avoid what is probably some unintentional POV. Help  may  be available from the Worcestershire project. --Kudpung (talk) 03:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: What might the radius of the sharp curves be?    Tabletop (talk) 03:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sharp curve 

message: When were the platforms with the sharp curved opened?   Could other, later, railways have learned from the squeal problem and avoided similar sharp curves, especially in residential areas, such as Wollstonecraft railway station c1890?    Tabletop (talk) 05:04, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the platforms on the Redditch branch were probably opened at the same time as that line, i.e. 19 September 1859. Back then, passenger coaches were non-bogie - short wheelbase four- or six-wheelers, and flange squeal would not be such a great problem. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening date?
Talk:Bromsgrove railway station

message: To:- recent estimates state that the station could be operational by Easter 2009.--Kudpung (talk) 17:21, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The dates appear to have slipped - I'll update the article to reflect this. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 17:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Update needed

message: With the new station, it has now has a ticket office. Does the DFT category still stay the same? It doesnt' look like they've updated categories for some time. Horizon22 (talk) 12:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Station now staffed
Talk:Bewdley railway station

message: Hi. Could you  please expand 'SVR' for the likes of idiots like me :) Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 08:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: SVR abbreviation

message: Article neither meets C class, nor B class criteria. See WP guidelines for details.--Kudpung (talk) 14:12, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: tv and film appearances
HI, knowing that this station has been used for location filming for tv and cinema I would like to add some text as shown following this post, does anyone have a problem with this?
Jehodgson (talk) 22:17, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible helpful addition? 

message: Bewdley Railway Station is also noted as a filming location for a number of television and cinema productions. These include 1992 Film 'Howard's End', and 2007 film 'Woes of the Departed', and is perhaps best known as the station from the 1984 BBC Television adaptation of the John Masefield novel 'The Box of Delights'.
My reference page is from IMDB:
http://www.imdb.com/search/title?locations=Bewdley%20Station,%20Worcestershire,%20England,%20UK
thanks
jehodgson
Jehodgson (talk) 22:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Media Appearances 
Talk:Country Park Halt railway station

message: Given that railway request stops are incredibly rare these days - at least, without some kind of electronic communication system - it would be useful if someone could add a paragraph explaining exactly how one (safely) requests a steam train to stop, from the platform.
Does one really just hold out one's hand, as if hailing a bus?
Surely the foilage of this woodland stop makes it difficult for the train driver to see potential hailing passengers from the platform?
Andrew Oakley 09:19, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just like hailing a bus, really. Most official instructions say you should "make a clear hand signal to the driver". The driver of the train will have slowed down on approach to the station and will be looking closely for any potential passengers. -=# Amos E Wolfe talk #=- 21:28, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: How to request a train to stop, from the platform?
Talk:Arley railway station

message: Should you ever desire customers, I would recommend directions or at least post codes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.210.46 (talk • contribs) 18:12, February 16, 2009
:Wikipedia is not a tourism guidebook. Slambo (Speak) 01:13, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Coalport West railway station

message: Should this topic be changed to Coalport (GWR) railway station? Since there were two stations at Coalport, one on each side of the River Severn, originally operated by two seperate companies.7severn7 11:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this query, the page has been renamed in accordance with Butt and convention.  However I have been unable to find any evidence that the name "Coalport West" was used in practice, as per the references in the paragraph I have added. If Butt is correct in his statement at the station was renamed by BR, then it may perhaps have been for internal administrative purposes only. I have nevertheless left the page named as it stands. Robin84F (talk) 17:34, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Ironbridge and Broseley railway station

message: As Ironbridge and Broseley were separate communities on opposite sides of the River Severn, respectively on the north and south bank, it would be useful if which bank it was on could be indicated (I am not local).Cloptonson (talk) 13:07, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Which side of River Severn?
Talk:Cound Halt railway station

message: Where did the information come from that currently appears in this article? Cound has a full sized Station building (probably one of the most substantial station building on the whole line apart from the terminuses), which according to the Grade II listing status records at Shrewsbury and Atcham was built in 1862. It seems strange that the SVR would build it in 1862 and then leave it unused until 1932. It is also difficult to believe that a station of that size and carrying a high level of commercial traffic (mostly coal), even though passenger throughput was low, would have been an unmanned halt. — 21stCenturyGreenstuff (talk) 16:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cound
Talk:Security-evaluated operating system

message: This article is very misleading, and out of date. Wouldn't it make sense to put some warning at the top? It doesn't even include the Snowden revelations - somebody reading this might be misled to believe that microsoft systems, or any other closed-source systems, can be secure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fustbariclation (talk • contribs) 16:24, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Wouldn't it make sense to suspend this?

message: Why is this linked to in the "See also"? As far as I can tell, EnGarde has no security certification, so it seems to have no more relevance to this article than any other OS that has been developed with security in mind. S. Ugarte (talk) 21:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like that contributor went through and pimped EnGarde in a bunch of articles where it isn't so relevant. I'm going to go through and clean these up, because it looks a lot like commercial promotion to me (EnGarde is not such a big-time Linux distro that it deserves a unique See Also as a "Unix-like OS", for example). S. Ugarte (talk) 21:42, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  EnGarde? 

message: The description for Trusted Solaris 8 includes:
Trusted Solaris Version 8 received the EAL4 certification level augmented by a number of protection profiles
This seems to imply that the evaluation is all about the assurance level, and just for additional swank, you can add "protection profiles" as a kind of set of merit badges.
My interpretation, which could admittedly be way off base, is that this is somewhat backwards: the protection profiles describe what you're evaluating (the security properties such as access control), and the EAL describes how rigorously this evaluation has been conducted.  Of further importance is the Target of Evaluation, which describes the scope of the evaluation -- that is, how much of the actual OS was tested.  Does this sound right?--NapoliRoma (talk) 15:06, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology