Talk:List of Major League Baseball players named in the Mitchell Report/Archive 1

message: Article is understandably in flux right now.  Just posting here as an FYI DavidRF (talk) 19:57, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chad Allen and Dan Naulty are in the PDF file. 

message: Is Sammy Hagar in here for a reason, or is his presence in this list just vandalism? Umbralcorax (talk) 20:05, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sammy Hagar? 

message: Uh, why are there six seperate references to the report? Are you planning on adding the page numbers later after you have a chance to look through the report? dposse (talk) 00:09, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, if you are going to cite the report, you need to include where this information can be found in the report. — Steven Andrew Miller (talk) 00:18, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  references to the report 

message: I've heard Marvin "Mighty Mouse" Benard linked to steroids before, but he's not mentioned here. What gives?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Electricbassguy (talk • contribs) 00:34, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, because the report is 400+ pages long and it was just released a few hours ago. Give us some time, okay? If that guy is in the Report, it'll get added soon. dposse (talk) 00:39, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marvin Benard??? 

message: When making references to the Report, please refer to page numbers. That is a must. Kingturtle (talk) 01:06, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. We must start doing that now for all the references, not just the first two. dposse (talk) 01:51, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've added page numbers to all the Mitchell Report citations after tracking down the quotes. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 02:15, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great work! Kingturtle (talk) 02:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page numbers a must 

message: Can we note which players are active versus retired? --Daysleeper47 (talk) 01:31, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We should note what years they were active in. For example, Roger Clemens would be 1984-Present dposse (talk) 01:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Active v. Retired players 

message: Please do not edit, reword or altercate the wording of these quotes in the "Allegation Excerpts from the Mitchell Report", unless it is to make a reference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GregFD3S (talk • contribs) 17:58, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing Direct Quotes from the Mitchell Report 

message: Where did you get it? I have the list on my talk page from MLB.com --HPJoker (talk) 16:13, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The list 

message: Shouldn't there be an indication of active players on the list? Jairus Garin (talk) 13:27, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Italics would work. Kingturtle (talk) 13:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about also bold face. THe Home Run list shows current players in bold face? Jairus Garin (talk) 19:53, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would work too. Let's see how it looks. Kingturtle (talk) 21:20, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indication of current players 

message: I already undid some vandalism on this page today. I would recommend that this page be protected from editing by newly registered or anonymous users for a few days.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpachico (talk • contribs) 03:49, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of vandalism 

message: As more player responses come out the table is going to get a bit confusing. For now I've divided the statements in the "allegation" column using italics for all post-report statements. I think we should keep to this format for now, and if most of the players end up responding, maybe we'll then add another column in the table for those responses. Equazcion • argue/improves • 07:37, 12/16/2007
:I think the italics are working well right now, and I agree that if many more come out a separate sections is appropriate. - Masonpatriot (talk) 19:55, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Players' post-report responses 

message: It might be better to paraphrase the responses rather than pasting quotes. The quotes are a bit long for a table. Equazcion • argue/improves • 18:19, 12/19/2007
:I had thought about it, but since this involves living people and potentially libelous accusations, I thought it better (at least for now) to actually quote their response. It's their response anyway. Since this isn't a paper encyclopedia, there is no real size limitation, and I would rather quote someone in this case than try and put words in their mouths. But ultimately it's a wiki, so if you feel so inclined, you could always edit them down. Mahalo. --Ali'i 18:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Player responses