lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Amethyst (disambiguation)

message: I commented at the end of the Dab page as follows:
: N.B. that this inter-lang link is highly questionable, since IL lks from Dabs must go to Dabs and by :en:WP standards, sl:Amethyst is *not* a Dab bcz one of its only 2 links is to sl:Seznam vojaških plovil Kraljeve vojne mornarice  which (1) provides no Amethyst info beyond implying that the word is a RN ship name, and (2) sends the user via its mock-blue-lk re sl:HMS Amethyst to another mock-Dab, consisting of red lks and one introductory blue lk back to sl:Seznam vojaških plovil Kraljeve vojne mornarice!
   Now find that a bot has separated the IL and the comment, by reversing their order and adding between them a lk to a Dab in the German WP. (BTW, that :de: Dab satisfies me as a legitimate target of an IL lk, for two reasons:
# I favor an interpretation of WP:DabRL whereby (English WP) Dab pages may have a single blue lk directly referring to a page reasonably referenceable by the base name of the Dab (or by the usual cast of very close variants) and one more blue link, in a "See also" section, to a Dab or article that reasonably could (tho perhaps mistakenly) be sought via the base name. (Siehe auch means "see also.)
# Besides, i have the impression the German WP has at least in practice a policy or guideline contrary to the principal substance of WP:DabRL, and i don't think our expectations about what a Dab should look like should be pushed to the point of disrupting links that take some users to encyclopedic -- as opposed to merely lexicographic -- info.)
   What i originally failed to note is besides the mock-blue-lk that leads on toward no relevant prose articles, the other of its 2 links is red. It is not a Dab bcz Dabs disambiguate among *articles* to which a title could apply, not potential titles for non-existent articles, which 1) is much further from our standard than is :de:'s apparent standard, and 2) fulfills no encyclopedic function.
   I regarded the comment (visible only to those who edited or viewed the markup in the edit pane) as an "noninvasive" contribution to remedying the apparent problem, but the bot pretty well trashed it, and other bots may similarly intervene. I'm now putting both a text and the IL lk inside comments, and a bot may restore the IL and/or move the link again to a less pertinent location. If so, the reappearance of the :sl: IL lk is a signal that will permit those who read this (and see no note explaining the restoration) to track down the bot and notify its owner that the matter will need more attention (if necessary, via the Slovenian WP's "embassy" on :en:).--Jerzy•t 03:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highly questionable inter-lang link
Talk:Liver tumor

message: I merged hepatic tumour to this article because I think this a more generally accesible page for this subject. --Steven Fruitsmaak 17:49, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I

message: This page is more accurately titled "Liver tumor", because the article includes both benign and malignant tumors. Axl 16:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, Andrew. Liver cancer should re-direct to hepatocellular carcinoma.Axl 09:14, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

text: "All articles on Wikipedia about cancer don't discuss the concept of the tumour, but the cancer itself." That's because articles about cancer are, er, about cancer. That's exactly my point. "It also creates controversy over the BrE/AmE spelling." Numerous articles have one or other variant spelling. All that is required is a re-direct from the counterpart. Indeed "Tumour" re-directs to "Tumor". Axl 06:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested move 

message: Using a newly available monoclonal antibody, they (University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine researchers) demonstrated significant reductions in tumor cell proliferation and survival in human and mouse hepatocellular cancer (HCC) cell lines. According to the researchers, this finding has significant implications not only for the treatment of liver cancer but for a number of different types of cancer.  Brian Pearson 02:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Antibody retards growth and induces death in liver cancer cells" 

message: This is a summary of the peer review document I filled out for user Medicalcomm's edits to the "benign" section of this page:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lead section: Put a definition of ‘benign’
Article: Add images, add in additional links to other wikipedia pages
References: looks great, no suggestions
Overall article: read through for grammar, otherwise looks great  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beckgold (talk • contribs) 01:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review for "benign" section
Talk:Alfonso Herrera

message: Just a reminder to everyone, the discussion page of an article is for the purpose of discussing and proposing changes to that article.  It is NOT a fan forum.  ClixTrek 02:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose of Discussion Page
Talk:Chief (DC Comics)

message: Where did that picture come from?--UltimatePyro 18:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I handled the grammar clean up, and few other copyediting issues.  What this article needs now is someone who is really familiar with Doom Patrol history to put Caulder's bio in order.  It's a real mess.  As it currently exists, it blends together the Silver Age history, the Vertigo years, and the current reboot (and ignores John Byrne's brief run with the series).  Any Doom Patrol fans out there? Konczewski 20:16, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since "John Byrne's brief run with the series" was itself rebooted out of existence soon after it was over, I'd say it doesn't need to be mentioned in individual character articles. Ted Watson (talk) 20:30, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: Napi, or "The Chief", a supporting character in the film Wonder Woman 
  הראש (talk) 14:12, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:E.S.P. (Bee Gees album)

message: There is no dot after the last letter p, so title should be E.S.P. To be totally correct it should be E·S·P. Any comments about this ? --Ilion2 (talk) 11:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: E·S·P is already the title in the table in Bee_Gees_discography#Studio_albums. --Ilion2 (talk) 11:36, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Defence Logistics Organisation

message: As of April 2007 the DLO is transitioning to the new Defence Equipment & Support / DE&S organisation, including the merger with the Defence Procurement Agency.
I suggest that we need to create a new page for DE&S, to which will migrate current information from DPA and DLO topics from April onwards, leaving the DPA and DLO articles covering the historic role and position of those organisations to that date. 
Welsh 12:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DE&S
Talk:Number Ones (Bee Gees album)

message: This was #3 in the UK - not a number one Coachtripfan (talk) 10:33, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Deep is Your Love
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Nichada

message: I'm curious how the result was "keep"? If anything, it was "no consensus" or "merge". ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, this seems more like a "no concensus" that a definitive "keep". --CrypticBacon 00:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Unfortunately, only three people even expressed an opinion on it. I still don't think a meighborhood deserves an article. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 17:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Result was keep?
Talk:13 shocking secrets you'll wish you never knew about Lemony Snicket

message: I'd like to note that although #13 spells out "He is finished", the word 'finished' can also be rearranged to spell 'fiendish'. And with this pointing at Lemony Snicket, I thought it was interesting.
What is left to even do with this page? It seems to cover all the relevant info. Perhaps the link to download the pdf file? and internal links, plus the template.Rochelle CMN 16:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering, if LS is CO, and CO is dead, then how could LS write about his own death? KKIPPES 08:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Sometimes, also, LS talks aboutmany things against CO and esme squalor, and if LS is CO, why would he be against ES? 210.79.179.61 11:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

text: When it says LS helped Beatrice commit a series crime before her death, does tis mean shae knew she was going to die or did she have anything to do with the fire that killed them. Maybe she was inlove with LS so she did the fire to kill her husband and maybe she was the survivor.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.70.122.103 (talk) 18:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  #13
Talk:Blue Lagoon Local Nature Reserve

message: Added sources and removed no source tag. (Neostinker 10:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No Sources

message: Added several more links to the article, hope this is better! (Neostinker 10:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Links
Talk:Godzilla Against Mechagodzilla

message: I have to refute the argument that this film is "in continuity" with Mothra or War of the Gargantuas. Yes it uses stock footage from them, but it writes an entirely different story for the events that took place during those films. Dave (talk) 06:32, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity 

message: The article says that they said that Mothra fell to the heatray. This is incorrect. They say that, "We invented a [...I can't remember...] heatray to kill that monster." Or something like that. I don't think they ever said anything about it working. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.224.229.18 (talk) 16:45, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mothra Heat Ray 

message: Hoping that I don't step on anyone's toes here, but I went through and reworked the plot summary because I didn't think that it really did an adequate job, or was even particularly accurate in many points. I will point out that I was adding a lot of the stuff while I was watching the movie, so I'm relatively confident on my facts, though I am not a Godzilla expert by any stretch of the imagination.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.195.239.127 (talk) 05:52, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited Plot
Talk:Godzilla vs. Biollante

message: Rather than start an editing war, I figure to put this here.  Does the DVD releases section really need to be here?  If it's not planned to be released, why is it relevant? On a slightly different note, why does the section refer to Sony Home Entertainment, when Tristar is the company distributing the Godzilla movies? ~Mecha DarkWarrior 22:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DVD Release

message: This article is incomplete, and the production section is missing information on the filming which needs to be added to the article with proper citations for its information. The reception section is also too short and needs more reviews from critics added to the article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Godzilla vs. Mechagodzilla II

message: Hello, i read the plot description after just watching this film and i must say it looks incorrect.  I don't know if its that way because of the difference between the dub and the sub, but i think it needs to be looked into...12.27.8.175 (talk) 14:28, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  plot... 

message: The second paragraph reads, "The JSDF mobilizes Mechagodzilla..."  Who is the JSDF? You can't just drop a mention of a new organization into the synopsis, and with an abbreviated name; you have to establish who or what they are. If the name is an abbreviation, then the full name needs to be initially spelled out. Is this the organization known as G-Force? Is this the first appearance of that group? Nightscream (talk) 23:08, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Exposition needed in passage
Talk:Godzilla vs. Mothra

message: There is something seriously wrong with this. I watched the English dub, and the story is different. In it, I'm pretty sure that the egg hatched and then Godzilla, the newly hatched Mothra, and Battra fight. Agent_Koopa 02:40, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Devils on the Doorstep

message: *Move.  According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English), the title of an article should be in English usually.  Devils on the Doorstep is the official English title of the movie Guizi lai le.  Therefore it should be the title of the article. User:Plastictv did an excellent job in editing Devils on the Doorstep. But he did not move Guizi lai le but just cut and paste.  This is not allowed by Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page.  Therefore I reverted his edits and request to move.  Thanks. --Neo-Jay 19:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  move [[Guizi lai le]] to [[Devils on the Doorstep]] 
Talk:Faro Los Morrillos de Cabo Rojo

message: The location given is not in the southwest corner of the island, so it appears that the listed coordinates are wrong.  According to the photo at the coordinates given, it's the "Culebrita" lighthouse at that location.71.203.125.108 (talk) 09:22, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: FixedEl Johnson (talk) 22:18, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates Wrong
Talk:Heavy Metal 2000

message: This entry needs a reception section. How did fans of the original like/dislike this sequel?  How did critics react? --24.249.108.133 06:20, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think anyone has the heart to post about how ruefully bad this movie was. Bloody Sacha 15:46, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

text: The movie is OK regarding the standards. What is wanted by the new generations to be liked? --Manfariel (talk) 20:16, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception? 

message: I saw this movie, and there was more in the plot than stated in the article.
:::Usually movie article plots are meant to be a summary. There is already to much in there I think. --< Nicht Nein! (talk) 07:07, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And the movie summaries on wikipedia have the ending...--Ssteiner209 (talk) 01:14, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I redid the summary so it fits within the 700 words per WP:FILMPLOT, but it can be condensed further if need be. -AngusWOOF (talk) 02:49, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot? 

message: User:Faster2010 is removing the sourced production company and distributor in the infobox.  I have added the content along with a Variety source.  I'm not going to edit war over this, but it makes no sense to delete something and not even have the courtesy to say why in your edit summary.  Why do you think your unsourced additions are correct?  Do you think readers should trust you over Variety? —Mike Allen  04:30, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production company and distributor 

message: Would it be relevant to the article if mentioned that the "Tyler" of V (1983 miniseries) lends his voice to the "Tyler" of this movie? Was it intentional? --Manfariel (talk) 20:39, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael Ironside
Talk:Leningrad (song)

message: Someone might mention in the Page that the melody of
the song "Leningrad" sounds like being based on one of
those many themes of Pjotr Illych Tchaikovsky's Violin
concerto Nr. 3 (D major)
(I'm aware that *I* could be that someone, but I'm
too reluctant by nature :-)
----
is it really necessary to put a spoiler tag on the content of the song?--Kevis 15:06, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Dear all,
have added the lyrics and a youtube.com link to the video.
rgds
julian —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.150.64.207 (talk) 17:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted that. Copyrighted lyrics aren't allowed on Wikipedia. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  added lyrics & link to vid 

message: I deleted the reference to Tchaikovsky's violin concerto, since the main theme has nothing in common with the Leningrad themes.
Joel itself told the german public during his concerts 2006 that he borrowed themes from two other composers. He himself mentioned Edvard Grieg. Other sources found similarities to Brahm's "Waldesnacht, du wunderkühle" (can be heard here, at 1:10). -- 194.39.218.10 (talk) 06:23, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That was a good call. After some checking I could find no evidence in WP:RS to support the Tchaikovsky theory. I also listened to both pieces of music and was unable to detect any similarities.  Philg88 ♦talk 08:08, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "borrowed" themes 
Talk:Jack Frost 2: Revenge of the Mutant Killer Snowman

message: Would anyone who has seen this movie and also knows the english language mind putting this article into it? It's near incomprehensible. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.114.72.116 (talk) 19:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 
Talk:The Ladies Man

message: So, I have been looking at this article for where to go for sources to verify information. The only source I found was a review of The Ladies Man, and I do not how to incorporate it into the article. Any help or advice on whether or not to add this source:
The Variety Staff. "The Ladies' Man" (December 1960) http://www.variety.com/review/VE1117792398/ I am new here and still getting the hang of things, so please let me know if I am doing something wrong.Kdeorne1 (talk) 18:09, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verifying through Sources
Talk:The Little Vampire (film)

message: The IMDB entry on the 1985 series is missing some actors. Who played Anton's parents? Who played Effie, the older girl? And it didn't list Bruno Gerussi, who showed up in the last couple of episodes. GCapp1959.
They're listed on the fansite in the External Links:
*Anton Bayers - Christopher Stanton 
*Helga Bayers - Susann Hogan  
*Robert Bayers - Michael Hogan  
*Mrs. Perkins - Barbara Reese  
*Effie Perkins - Kathy Wenschlag   
*Cyril Shafer  - Christopher Kent  
--Kunzite 05:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1985 Series

message: Doesn't the film need a separate page?  I think so.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.228.119 (talk) 03:37, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Film page
Talk:Love's Labour's Lost (film)

message: I don't know if you can really call this film a "box office disaster" - you sort of have to have a film with a reasonable hope of moneymaking in order for it to be rightly called a "box office disaster."  "Disappointment" is a much better word, because it just didn't open anywhere due to unenthusiastic reviews, hence didn't make much money.
Well I saw it and it was bloody awful. If I print that somewhere can we cite it?CaraPolkaDots (talk) 23:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box office 
Talk:Mission Kashmir

message: TOI Shahid • Talk2me 16:27, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ToI
Talk:QVC (British TV channel)

message: I don't think there is much more information about the QVC active article that could not be incorporated into the QVC (UK) article. There isn't enough information in the QVC active article to warrant a separate article anyway. I proposed it should be merged with the QVC (UK) article. Sonic 18:58, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I'll merge it now and if need be it can be reverted back to what it was. --AntzUK 20:37, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merge of QVC Active article into QVC (UK)
Talk:My Dog Skip (film)

message: Exactly why is it important to know why Adam 'Skip' Dhalgren starred in this movie when no such person even exists? And definitely acts better than Frankie Muniz?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.190.103.56 (talk) 01:41, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous sentence
Talk:Dr. Know (band)

message: “Toucher declined, but Hernandez and Cruz recruited others and embarked on a North American tour with big-name punk acts of the time.”
The term “big-name” seems biased - what makes them well known if they are not even listed here specifically?
“The band recorded studio versions of several early songs with Cruz, which led to television appearances and gigs on the Los Angeles circuit.”
This section is vague- the specific TV appearances the band made should be cited here.
“May 2010, Dr. Know with Hernandez and Cruz played a final gig. This version of the band played 2 more special gigs in Santa Cruz, Ca., and in Oakland, November 25 and 26, 2011, as well.”
More effort should be made to add sources to the referenced show dates. Here is a link to a flyer from the Oakland November 26, 2011 show at the Metro Opera House: http://holdmyticket.com/event/31638
Agarrisonorr (talk) 03:10, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested Edits

message: As far as I know, the name of this band is a reference to Dr. Know the guitar player from Bad Brains, but I can't find a valid source for that information. Daniel Leal Werneck (talk) 13:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the band name
Talk:Granby High School

message: should there be anything about the granby roll??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.224.22.240 (talk) 21:43, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn’t it true that there’s about 3 fights per week? 2600:8805:2300:1940:BC35:4819:6F62:9469 (talk) 23:06, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fights
Talk:The Closet (2001 film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 06:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag
Talk:Pokémon: Mewtwo Returns

message: Will "Mewtwo Returns" be a work same as "ミュウツー!我ハココニ在リ"?220.57.40.5 09:52, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  same as ミュウツー!我ハココニ在リ? 

message: Shouldn't this film be included in the Pokemon series movies box with all of the other films?  I find its omission odd.  Dfsghjkgfhdg (talk) 02:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pokemon Movies

message: The Nidoqueen Mewtwo cloned can be seen with babies. But instead of Nidorans they're all small Nidoqueens
This is either a mistake on the staff's part, or because Mewtwo wanted powerful pokemon, he might have programed out the genes that would produce offspring that would be of the first stage in the evolution chance. Either way i think this is worth noting Yami (talk) 19:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie/Script Error or something else 

message: Since "The Uncut Story of Mewtwo’s Origin" is meant to be added at the beginning of Mewtwo Strikes Back, I think that its section should be moved to the page Pokémon: The First Movie, even though the American version of the first movie only showed the first two minutes and the full version was only shown in the "Mewtwo Returns" DVD. Plus, the voice cast of this feature is already included in the page about the first move and not here. Are there any objections to the move? --Newblackwhite (talk) 21:28, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Uncut Story of Mewtwo’s Origin
Talk:Pollock (film)

message: That is a really good article!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.46.6.114 (talk) 23:28, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Lisa Lawley, the artist, is listed in the credits as an art coach and given credit for some of the works shown in the film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.48.7.161 (talk) 08:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artwork 
Talk:Ottawa Central Station

message: While Ottawa Bus Central Station may seem like an unusual naming, it remains the name given in the Yellow Pages listing  and also the name given when calling the station's main number +1 613 238 5900. The article's name should continue to reflect this. Dl2000 (talk) 01:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I notice that all the signage is "Station Centrale" the same as in Montreal and if that is a brand name or the proper name, perhaps that is what should be used. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 14:21, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article/station name
Talk:Quints

message: Quints also commonly refers to a type of marching band instrument described here.  Should there perhaps be a note at the top of this page?
128.36.161.125 (talk) 22:59, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! BOVINEBOY2008 :) 01:05, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Redirect