lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sheppard East LRT

message: According to the TTC's official Twitter feed, it has designated this line as Line 7 Sheppard East.
I am asking for consensus, especially given WP:Twitter-EL.  Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:31, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: see . -- EzekielT Talk 15:50, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line 7 Sheppard East? 

message: I reverted the addition of the Citadis Spirit vehicles to this article by an IP just now. From what I read (Metrolinx press release via Steve Munro's blog, maybe not the most reliable but better than no source at all) the Alstom purchase is meant to ensure that there are cars for Eglinton to open on time in case Bombardier continues to not deliver. If Bombardier does come through, the Alstom cars will be used on either Finch or the Hurontario LRT. There is no mention of the Alstom cars being potentially used on Sheppard. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:28, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metrolinx and the Alstom LRV purchase 

message: Please add a map to show where this line would be.
70.26.14.187 (talk) 23:00, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map needed 

message: The EELRT (Eglinton East) has officially taken the title of line 7 in a recent metrolinx report. The EELRT deserves its own wiki page and the redirect of line 7 should be reserved for it 184.146.202.26 (talk) 02:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect of “line 7”
Talk:Myotherapy

message: Myo = Muscle + therapy = muscle therapy, or more well known as massage therapy. I believe it would be inaccurate to claim these two words as some chiropractic method.
A great many therapist across many professions use her techniques. 
"TENS therapy, Dry needling, Stretching, Corrective exercises, Mobilisation, Cupping, Massage."
But mostly used by Massage Therapists.
I feel like "claiming" this phrase to be a chiropractic method or something of her creation to be very inaccurate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zaccarterlmt (talk • contribs) 05:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking in PUBMED it seems to be used exclusively to refer to an orthodontic technique. Prudden's "myotherapy" should be called "Bonnie Prudden Myotherapy" to distinguish it from mainstream usage. Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 14:53, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myotherapy is more a general phrase than anything. 

message: This article seems to be about "Bonnie Prudden Myotherapy" ... an altmed massage technique.
In mainstream medicine, myotherapy appears to be a synonym for "(oral) myofunctional therapy", a kind of muscle training technique used in dentistry.
This needs to be sorted out. It is proposed that the content here into be trimmed and merged into Bonnie Prudden. After that it should be possible to create "Myofunctional therapy" page that describes that orthodontic technique, and make Myotherapy a disambiguation page. Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 08:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Then where should material on mainstream/dental myotherapy appear? Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 15:03, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

text: And that would just be in the USA anyway, I suppose? Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 15:47, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

text: Great - what are these sources? Does one provide a good definition of what "myotherapy" is, for example? Alexbrn talk|contribs|COI 10:50, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: This article needs references to support it's content. In particular all biomedical information requires WP:MEDRS quality sources. All biomedical content not supported by appropriate references is subject to removal and all content with no reference at all is subject to removal. - - MrBill3 (talk) 07:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  References severely lacking
Category talk:AfD debates (Biographical)

message: I have this page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nam Taehyun (2nd nomination)  here that was created by me after I was told I did it wrong the first time because it was actually a second deletion. Anyways I created it but unlike first deletions 2nd don't come with the template opption for how to submit to a list so I just found out about by submitting another article for deletion and am now trying to figure out how to get the other one in here but the page woln't take it.  The article's deletion discussion had so far been open for 6 weeks.Peachywink (talk) 04:51, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: I have no clue how to do this

message: I am the subject of a bio on Wikipedia that is being considered for deletion. I have corrected one of my book titles that is listed in my bio. In addition, I have added numerous reference sources that include several articles from the New York Times as well as a review of my most recent book from Publishers Weekly. Altogether, I have written 12 non-fiction books that have been published my major publishers. In addition, I am the official biographer of legendary handbag designer, Judith Leiber, and I have been noted as such in obituaries about Judith Leiber that appeared in the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. I would like to know when the deletion prologue to my bio may be eliminated. Thank you, Jeffrey Sussman  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.27.219.67 (talk) 21:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeffrey Sussman
Talk:Andrey Krylov

message: Suggested below are potential adjustments, improvements and emendations to the existing four [as of this writing, on November 10, 2014] entries within the Andrey Krylov disambiguation page. Only those bearing the name "Andrey/Andrei Krylov", who are mentioned in Wikipedia articles, are eligible for inclusion.
Since all of those listed are named either "Andrey Krylov" or "Andrei Krylov", the names are indicated in chronological order, by year of birth. Since three of the four listed individuals are sports competitors, they are indicated under sub-section header "Athletes". The remaining name is then listed under "Other". The last sub-section header, "See also", provides a link to the surname "Krylov", thus enabling users to access the list of all subjects of Wikipedia biographical entries who bear this surname.
Andrei or Andrey Krylov may refer to:
===Athletes===
*Andrey Krylov (swimmer born 1956), Russian competitor who won four medals for Soviet Union in Summer Olympics: silver in 4x200 freestyle relay at Montreal (1976) as well as gold in 4x200 freestyle relay and silver in 200m freestyle and 400m freestyle at Moscow (1980)
*Andrey Krylov (swimmer born 1984), Russian competitor who set national record in his specialty, individual 400m medley, but while competing in that event at 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing, did not manage to reach finals
*Andrey Krylov (gymnast) (born 1988), Russian competitor who won gold medal in men's tumbling at 2007 Trampoline World Championships, but received year-long suspension (October 2012–September 2013) upon testing positive for stimulants at 2012 Trampoline World Cup
===Other=== 
*Andrei Krylov (born 1961), Russian guitarist (7- and 6-string), composer (classical, flamenco, New Age) and poet who performs internationally; has written film music and volumes of poetry (Mirrors, Game of Life [sonnets], Lake Monastery, Autumn); immigrated to Canada
===See also===
*Krylov (surname)
 —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 07:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional details for discussion in amplifying entries within the [[Andrey Krylov]] disambiguation page

message: *Krylov (surname)
 —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 07:16, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: See also
Talk:Cry Before Dawn

message: Work in progress, research ongoing into the band - DO NOT DELETE.--Pandaplodder (talk) 15:12, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008 post
Talk:Michael Birch (businessman)

message: Woo hoo Michael, you have your own wikipedia page!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.75.184.46 (talk) 17:51, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Michael Birch has requested his photo be changed.  I've pasted the link to the preferred image on Flikr below.  MB owns the rights to this photo.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Birch_(businessman)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/88964458@N05/8109407510/in/photostream
Many thanks - Hal Stokes  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Halstokes (talk • contribs) 10:26, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael Birch requests a photo change
Talk:Hutchinson metric

message: Huh? Avruchtalk 15:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what mathematical definitions look like! The article needs a qualitative description about what this metric is in the lead, and some discussion of applications, but the definition is as good as it's going to get, I expect. --Tango (talk) 17:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?

message: I forgot the references (e.g. some survey about Kantorovitch), but this "Hutchinson metric" appears in the literature under several names e.g. Monge-Kantorovitch metric, since it plays some role in the transportation problem and Monge-Ampere equation. Barnsley & others used this I think after Hutchinson papers, hence the new tradition. --Megaloxantha (talk) 03:02, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's my sense of the history, too.  I believe it's most properly called the Wasserstein metric (look at the dual representation of W1).  It's also called the Kantorovich-Rubinstein-Wasserstein metric, the Fortet-Mourier norm and the earth mover's distance.75.168.185.28 (talk) 03:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Equivalent names

message: and in addition required as compact?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.83.2.200 (talk) 09:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Only Finite Metric Spaces?
Talk:Laurence Olivier Award for Best New Musical

message: I'm not sure this article on the "Oliver" Award for Best New Musical(note incorrect spelling), is useful. Showing the song lists seems to me to be duplicative (of the article on the production). The basic list is, of course, already here: Laurence Olivier Awards.
I'm inclined to think this article should be nominated for deletion, but 1) I think there should be discussion before that happens, and 2) I don't know how to do that nomination.
Thoughts? Comments? JeanColumbia (talk) 15:28, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would vote to delete this article: It is entirely duplicative of the Olivier Awards article; it adds nothing new.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The article

message: I see that the article on the Olivier Awards has been significantly changed, so that there are now separate articles for each of the categories.  Also, instead of song lists, this article (Best New Musical) now shows award winners. Therefore, my earlier comments (above, from 1/29/08) no longer apply. JeanColumbia (talk) 17:16, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Me too.  :)  -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: April 14, 2008
Talk:John Peel's Record Box

message: This is a short part of the film on Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qjqR8gt8ZYI -- Simplicius (talk) 15:08, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not any more. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 21:54, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  YouTube again: This is part 1 of 4 of a programme entitled "John Peel's Record Box": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GebrWLppW8 -- sugarfish (talk) 15:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Youtube

message: The Times' list is said to have some small mistakes. Also, annother source is speaking of 143 records. -- Simplicius (talk) 15:25, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I didn't want to make changes as it's possible that there is a reason, but some of the singles listed seem to not be in alphabetical order. This is obvious toward the end of the list. It's possible someone is just too lazy to reorder as it would involve renumbering also. Yeah, I know there's the sorting function, but still, the initial sorting is off. -- sugarfish (talk) 15:34, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ordering (Alphabetical or Otherwise)
Talk:Chuck Pagano

message: Chuck Pagano is the former head coach of the Indianapolis Colts. He was fired on January 4th, 2015
205.201.72.57 (talk) 14:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: False. They re-signed him to a four-year extension. MavsFan28 (talk) 04:10, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2016 
Talk:Discretionary access control

message: The definition given by the TCSEC is poorly written (which not a first for DoD documents) and confuses identity-based access control with DAC.  IBAC can be either mandatory or discretionary.  (Nor is DAC specific to unix-like systems, as you might be forgiven for thinking after reading the TCSEC).  The part about DAC allowing a subject to pass permission to any other subject is sometimes (but not always) true, but DAC is more general.  The intro should be rewritten to give a more general definition of DAC that doesn't necessarily reference the Orange Book definition. Gdlong (talk) 15:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  TCSEC is out of date 

message: -ixes use the term "file mode bits" to refer to what Windows calls "Permission bits" and to a file's mode.  Please see what I added to the Discussion page that the text links to.
Kernel.package (talk) 04:29, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unix/Linux terminology 
Template talk:Mike Tyson

message: Is this an appropriate use of a template? You could conceivably do this for any major boxer, or any celebrity, and have dozens of templates at the bottom of every celebrity article.  Will there be an Evander Holyfield template at the bottom of the Mike Tyson article? A Lennox Lewis template?  Is Mike Tyson's mug going to be at the bottom of the Islam article?  This seems to be motivated more by fanboydom than any real need. JoeFink (talk) 15:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The value of this template is questionable. The movie appearances section should go.--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 22:50, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is an article called Mike Tyson in popular culture. I think he warrants his own template. --Endless Dan 22:55, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. I agree.  The movie appearances are not a significant part of his career and shouldn't be in the template.--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 19:52, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Alice + Olivia

message: Why does this article- and Bendet's own- seemingly go out of its way not to mention the other founding partner's name? It seems contrived in a weird way.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.2.127.126 (talk) 01:19, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: The other founder

message: Is it typical to include the university of the founder in the first sentence of the company page?  I might suggest removing "University of Pennsylvania alumna" from the first sentence or discussing that later -- to me seems boastful there as-is. Ellaby12 (talk) 18:36, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  bendet's alma mater?
Wikipedia talk:Suspected sock puppets/Fioranoweb (2nd)

message: Update:
#Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/2007 Archive Aug#Fiorano Software spam on Wikipedia
#m:Talk:Spam_blacklist/Archives/2007/08#Fiorano Software spam
#Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam#Fiorano Software (again) (permanent link)
#Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fioranoweb (2nd)
#Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Fioranoweb (3rd)
#:Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Fioranoweb
#Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Dealing with some extremely persistent spammers (permanent link) 
--A. B. (talk)  16:00, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:La reine de Saba

message: Jay, is there some reason to remove the premiere cast member's names? Sparafucil (talk) 23:22, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppss, it must accident, I'll put it back. Sorry and thanks for telling - Jay (talk) 01:22, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Hi,  Is your edition published by Chouens as well?   Mine says four acts on the title page, but it has enough material in 'act 3' to make two halves.   I wouldnt be very surprized to find such differences in succesive printings; Huebner (the source of the most of the gounod.com material) tries to tell them apart by citing according to the final page number, which of course changes when material is added or cut (usually!).   Feel free to relegate the 4 act ed. to the footnote, if you have a source that corroborates Grove. Sparafucil (talk) 01:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Living stump

message: This article does not have nearly enough substance. There are no sub sections. Only the lead paragraph which is poor at best. The very first source is a direct "copy and paste" from the source with no quotations. It was not reworded. The second source doesn't back up the statement made, even though the statement is straight forward. There are better sources to chose from. 
Several new sections could be created after the lead paragraph. A section about man made (silviculture) and natural causes (Chestnut blight) of living stumps. Another section could be about resprouting tendencies/strategies, and another for adopted ecological roles of living stumps, and their importance to wildlife.
In conclusion, this article needs an entire overhaul. The only piece worth keeping is the picture. The lead paragraph needs to be rewritten in a way that is informative and compels the reader to dig deeper into the topic. The subjects that follow should be thorough in explaining the biology, ecology, and environmental effects of living stumps. This is not a political article, so bias is avoidable, but strong scientific sources are necessary to give this article credibility. 
Jo939612 (talk) 19:22, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1979 Welsh devolution referendum

message: Which idiots voted for this to be moved from the "self-government" cat to "Welsh nationalism"? --MacRusgail (talk) 13:33, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The 'discussion' was held here. Three editors were involved and no notification of the discussion (such as it was) was made to any of the pages that would be affected. Not very impressive. Daicaregos (talk) 14:03, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, another discussion held in some dark corner of wikipedia that none of the voters bothered to tell the rest of us about. "Not very impressive" indeed. It's one thing moving Cymru Goch to Welsh nationalism, another entirely to move this article to it, particularly considering that the referendum was mooted by the Labour Party (although admittedly the issue split the Welsh Labour Party) and was supported by some Liberals as well.--MacRusgail (talk) 15:25, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Asian Handball Federation

message: As per WP:CP, I have deleted most of the text concerning the ongoing controversy as it was clearly copy-and-pasted from http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2008/01/136_17644.html . Concerning the members table, Japan and S. Korea may have disappeared from some of the pages in AHF website, but that does not mean that they are expelled from the federation. I don't hear about any decisions being made anywhere so I'm putting them back in for now. --朝彦 (Asahiko) (talk) 16:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of text
File talk:ArmenianGenocideRecognition.png

message: I think this image needs a legend describing what each color means. Also we can introduce a third color (green), those countries that neither recognize,nor deny but failed to pass the recognition in parlament. Steelmate (talk) 16:23, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legend 

message: ... and thats what it is about, "RECOGNITION" of the armenian genocide. Please continue discussing at Recognition_of_the_Armenian_Genocide  —Preceding unsigned comment added by XmuratX (talk • contribs) 14:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  6 Countries officially refusing to recognize 

message: Why has Chile been removed?? 83.24.237.81 (talk) 01:52, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chile 

message: New documents reveal US recognized Armenian Genocide in 1951. Please fix the map. Include US and Chile.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.91.204.127 (talk) 17:30, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  US 

message: Why is Iran missing?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.97.112.194 (talk) 02:54, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iran 

message: individual states would be nice. 44 out of 50 is 6 too few.--69.248.225.198 (talk) 03:12, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  US
Talk:George Hildebrand

message: It seems odd to me, that his career started and ended on the same day, yet he played 11 games. This has fallen though the cracks somehow on both baseball-reference and retrosheet.  Will send a note to retrosheet and see if they can fix that.Neonblak talk -  07:31, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 11 games in one day?
Talk:Scottish Labour Party (Democratic Wing)

message: There may not be much of a distinction between a merge and a deletion in this context.  As far as I can see the only distinction is that if we merged we would still have a redirect to the main SLP article, if we deleted we would not.  In my view a redirect, although appropriate in the context of some merges, is not worth bothering about in this case.  Any comments? PatGallacher (talk) 02:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:William H. Johnson (artist)

message: i'm going to nominate this for GA, since the revscore indicates it. i trust user:Mary Mark Ockerbloom has it in hand. Duckduckstop (talk) 20:02, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: *  I haven't actually dealt with a GA before, but if you're willing to lend an eye to the process I'm game to get involved :-) Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 23:12, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: * I've updated the lead to be more comprehensive, and reviewed all the links cited, to ensure that they are current. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 01:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: *Mary Mark Ockerbloom, I thought I should let you know that Duckduckstop has just been blocked as a sockpuppet. If you'd still like to pursue this GA nomination, I'm happy to convert the nomination to be yours (there's a chance the nomination could be reverted otherwise, since edits by sockpuppets are frequently unwound). Just let me know how you'd like to proceed. (Duckduckstop nominated 17 articles in a very short period of time, and all but your two have been reverted or closed.) Don't let yourself be discouraged from pursuing the two nominations you have currently; I don't think you would have needed his help. If you do have any questions about the process, feel free to ask me. Best of luck! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: * Hi , yes, please convert these over to me, so that they can hopefully go forward. I'm so sorry to hear that there's an issue. As I noted above, I'm not familiar with the GA process, so any advice going forward would be much appreciated. Mary Mark Ockerbloom (talk) 13:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: *Okay, Mary Mark Ockerbloom, this one is done, and I'll be doing the other one shortly. Right now, the reviews are at the "waiting" stage; that section and the next (What to do during a review) explain the next steps in the process, as you wait for a reviewer to select and then start reviewing your nominations against the Good Article criteria. The reviewer will typically list changes that are needed to meet the criteria, and there's back-and-forth as you make edits to improve the article accordingly and/or explain why what they have requested wouldn't accurately reflect the sources and what you propose to do instead. It can be a nicely collaborative process. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: GA nomination
Talk:Artemisia princeps

message: with this artile???
http://baike.baidu.com/view/961805.html
http://baike.baidu.com/view/1055154.html
--222.67.216.140 (talk) 03:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could botanists please clearify the following..... 