Talk:Jacques le Gris

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
The only thing that needs a little tweaking is the prose. Once that is done then you may want to get a peer review to see how close this article is to becoming featured. Congratulations! T Rex | talk 07:44, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I realise the GA listing was recent, but for completeness have reassessed the article anyway and believe it still meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. An excellent companion article for Jean de Carrouges.
The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, EyeSereneTALK 08:31, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Sweeps (Pass) 

message: I've just read the following review of Jager's book. I sincerely hope it is not correct in its criticisms. The suggestion that "Jager admits to using his own invention to fill gaps in the sources" is particularly troubling. Review here. qp10qp 13:19, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Very interesting. (I've removed the full text for copyright reasons.) --ROGER DAVIES TALK 13:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is interesting and if accurate (and I can't really see why it shouldn't be) does undermine the article. I still think that Jager's book is an important source (as well as being effectively the only English source of any substance), but this concern about its reliability raises problems. I have been thinking about ways to deal with this issue but this review indicates the problems go deeper than I was anticipating. I shall have to think on this further.--Jackyd101 22:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review of Jager's book

message: The 'duplication' tag was added more than seven years ago now, but I don't suppose you recall what the section was meant to duplicate? Nev1 (talk) 20:14, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Jacques Le Gris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070809132623/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org:80/Duel to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Duel
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:19, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jacques Le Gris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070809132623/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Duel to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Duel
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Jacques Le Gris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814085359/http://college.ucla.edu/news/05/ejager.html to http://www.college.ucla.edu/news/05/ejager.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070814085359/http://college.ucla.edu/news/05/ejager.html to http://www.college.ucla.edu/news/05/ejager.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I think that the title of the article should be changed from "Jacques Le Gris" to "Jacques le Gris", which is more proper.
--Obversa (talk) 03:47, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor change to the title