lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gidget (TV series)

message: For episode listings of all 32 episodes of the original series, see tv.com. For the 1985 sequel telemovie and two season sitcom series from 1985, see The New Gidget. Andrewa 05:05, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: For episode listings

message: Images inserted into an article are in proportion to the article's length, layout, etc. This article can't take more than three. I've removed the Pete Duel/Betty Connor image to support the TV Guide cover. Please do not enlarge the TV Guide image nor add a lengthy caption. Overjoyed (talk) 15:42, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: You should make a article about Lynette Winter. I think there shoould be a article about every main person.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CPGirlAJ (talk • contribs) 21:26, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Lynette Winter? 

message: Re: the 2006 DVD -- Is the Sally Field interview from 1965, 2006, or other?
Can someone explain why the series' opening credits, in reruns, seems to have a different video presentation from what was probably originally aired in 1965-66? 
Seven1672 (talk) 07:42, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Questions 

message: Very minor quibble: the Plot section says that Gidget is being "guided through her fifteenth year." One's fifteenth year ends when one turns 15.  I think that Gidget is 15 when the show starts, so she would be in her sixteenth year.  Am I right that she's 15 at the start?Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 02:24, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed the material in the article.Arnold Rothstein1921 (talk) 22:54, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Gidget 14?
Talk:Waterkeeper Alliance

message: Does this belong in :Category:Survival skills ? Thanx 69.142.2.68 05:08, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I don't know who flagged this up as sounding like an advertisement. I think, it is simply stating what the organisation does. I challenge the person who flagged this to get off his backside and edit the article in a way in which he considers to be neutral rather than spamming. Thank you. John2o2o2o (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Flag 

message: plenty of stuff to do, but wondering if there's any interest in generating a list of members. could it be auto-populated via script from WA website? yeah, 350 is a *helluva* lot (;-) Maybe just new additions as they appear in the news? maybe unnecessary. 
Doug Grinbergs (talk) 22:25, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alliance members list?
Talk:Geinoh Yamashirogumi

message: I was wondering if anyone could give anymore infomation about the albums "Reverberation of Earth","Selections From African Folk Music","Selections From Folk Music on Silkroad" and this other live album called "Hirakareta Gasshou". Just at least the dates that they were released, they are from this list on this website. Alus 12:10, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album infomation help... 

message: I've never heard of a "musical collective". Doesn't sound quite like a band, not with "hundreds of people", and why are they from "all walks of life"? Why aren't they just musicians? This article doesn't make much sense. Boneyard90 (talk) 23:55, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a collective: a group of entities that share or are motivated by at least one common issue or interest, or work together on a specific project(s) to achieve a common objective. In this, that common interest is folk music from around the world. I've linked the word. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 00:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A what?
Talk:Recurring Final Fantasy monsters

message: Beastmen has been merged into the bestiary, however, I'm going to come back and split it up I think. The various creatures will be split into different sections of the bestiary and merged into existing entries (eg, Tonberry). Eventually, A simple list of beastmen in FFXI will remain and link to more detailed entries in the bestiary of the creatures. Chanlord 01:31, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Beastmen
Talk:Recurring Final Fantasy animals

message: Should it be mentioned that flan and soulflayers (mindflayers) in FFXI have a backstory to them? (Semi-spoiler: They're failed blue mages or something.) I say "semi" because this information was on the History of Blue Mage thing on the POL site.  (mass of thrashing feelers = Soulflayer; horrific mound of quivering flesh = Flan) --Jopasopa 02:05, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Why are Facers here? I can't remember them appearing in anything other than XII, and if they did and I just forgot, could someone add them? If they didn't, well I thought this bestiary is just for recurring and/or significant enemies/monsters in FFs, not every single adversary ever. --Jopasopa 22:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is already a precedence for not only creatures that appear in only one game, but are also insignificant and they aren't even adversaries: Papaopamus, Shoopuf, and maybe a couple others that I can't think of right now. --Daedalus 21:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facers
Talk:Recurring Final Fantasy creatures

message: Uh... I'd contest the validity of the statement that Final Fantasy 8 was the first Final Fantasy game in which summons were important to the storyline. Has the author of this statement played 6 at all?
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.29.33.92 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't Tiamat in Final Fantasy VIII be considered a boss as well? I'd certainly do, but it's debatable. Rantzien 21:10, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiamat 

message: Where's the Shinryu? WAAHHH! :(( —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.95.166.124 (talk) 01:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shinryu
Talk:Quasi-rent

message: Is this the same as "variable costs" (vs. fixed costs)?
Some unanswered questions after reading this article on Feb 1st, 2009:
It seems that quasi rents as compared to normal rents involves an issue of short term versus long term unit of analysis. Can someone elaborate on this? Maybe this relates to the difference between absolute value and marginal value.
In a lot of articles the concepts of "rent" and "value" are used interchangeably. Can someone explain the relationship precisely?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Axiomofnochoice (talk • contribs) 19:24, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

message: Quasi economirent wil act as transfare earnings in the short run according to shepherd templeman the economist explains economic rent as the maximum payment over the minimum payments[transfare earnings]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.246.61.186 (talk) 12:57, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  DIFFERANCE BETWEENQUASI ECONOMIC RENT AND ECONOMIC RENT 

message: Is Marshall's quasi rent the same as Marx's surplus profit? 193.1.66.236 (talk) 20:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quasi rent and surplus profit
Talk:LRG Capital Funds

message: I think this is just promotional material for this company.  The massive list of investments reads like an investment brochure, not an encyclopedia entry, I am deleting most of fit, but here it is for your edification.Seth J. Frantzman 23:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk
Talk:Ahmad Raza Khan

message: There appears to be a lot of stuff about this guy on the internet.  Unfortunately, every page seems to do a different variation on his name.  I'm not sure what's name and what's title.  In part, because I don't speak Arabic or understand Arabic naming conventions.  For instance, I've seen one page give his name as "Ash Shah Imam Ahmad Raza Khan Al-Qadiri Fadil al-Bareilly" and another as "Imam e Ahle Sunnat, Maulana Shah Ahmad Raza Khan."  I know "Imam" is a title, and I'm guessing "e Ahle Sunnat" means that he was an Ahle Sunnat in addition to being an Imam, but I don't know whether "Maulana Shah" is a title or a name; likewise, I don't know if "Al-Qadiri Fadil al-Bareilly" is part of his name or something like "from Qadiri before he moved to Bareilly".  So, I don't know if the article's even got his name right!  I just came in from wikipedia:Deadend pages, and while he seems interesting, I can't figure out even something as simple as how to list his name.  The Literate Engineer 05:30, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Thomas M'Crie

message: ----
Sent a permission request to the copyright holder. David Brooks 05:42, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: * Now we just need someone who is willing to spend enough time to get all this wikified and cleaned up, its quite a long article! — Wackymacs 09:32, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started some of the WIkifying, but I haven't got the heart to delete most of this beautiful prose, it does, however, badly need just that. I'll leave that to someone else however and stick to my wiki links. --(BojiDebater 03:50, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Existential fallacy

message: The article currently says "some A is B" on one line, and on the next line "This is invalid if the A form lacks ...".  Are these two different usages of the capital 'A' symbol?  If so, would it be very easy to improve the article by replacing the A, B and C symbols with P, Q and R?  Open4D (talk) 17:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different uses of A 

message: I read the article. Didn't understand the existential fallacy in the dinosaur example. Why is it a fallacy to assume dinosaurs exist??? (my email a.reinheimer@gmail.com)
77.138.17.217 (talk) 04:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dinosaur Example confusing!  

message: According to Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the the statement that something has propeties implies it exists, and this is a logical and philisophical problem. Thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:86C:7100:438:6EA9:B92C:6BB3 (talk) 00:07, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Are there such thing as nonexistent objects?
Talk:Cliff McReynolds

message: It just occurred to me, but I think the Where's Waldo? comparison (that is, Wally for you non–North Americans...) is very appropriate: a real expression of horror vacui itself. McReynolds' painting are filled with similarly involved scenes as are common in the Waldo books, though with somewhat more sinister and straightforwardly archetypal content. —Tarnas 06:01, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: if you said this, its not applicable to the article. who, outside WP, said this or made these comparisons.76.254.32.25 (talk) 22:41, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Where's Waldo?''
Talk:Net profit

message: "The gross margin percentage is a related ratio. This figure is calculated by dividing net profit by gross revenue, and it represents profitability as a percentage."
That can't be right.  The page author(s) must mean net margin.  Net margin is calculated by dividing net profit by gross revenue, and it represents profitability as a percentage.  Gross margin, on the other hand, is calculated as explained at Gross margin, and it represents gross profit as a percentage.
Joaquin Miller 06:15, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe they were inspired by Enron's financial staff.  I agree.  I'll fix it so I can sleep at night. MeekMark 03:15, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Can't be right

message: I know accounting terms are always going to be eye-glazing, but this article is simply opaque. It needs a thorough re-do, most importantly on any distinction between net income, net revenue, and net profit, which needs to be very lucidly explained without recourse to hyperlinked acronyms. If there's a difference between common use and best accounting practice, note that. If there's a difference between English and British English, note that. — LlywelynII 06:41, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs work

message: Hi. I don't we can have "Pre-tax profit" pointing here without some or other definition of what it is. Redirects are suppostly (mostly) for concepts that mean the same thing - which is not the case here.  Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 19:02, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-tax profit 

message: Synonym. Golopotw (talk) 13:56, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Support 2.90.210.75 (talk) 13:06, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Net income]]
Talk:Black Power (New Zealand gang)

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 06:48, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion

message: This article caught my eye with the following statement: "Like other gangs in New Zealand, they offer a surrogate family for alienated young men and are known to be increasingly active in organised crime"
Rubbish. They are a criminal gang where to be admitted crimes must be committed and often jail time served. Like most criminal gangs in NZ, black power manufacture and sell methamphetamine and other drugs. See the following for references supporting these facts:
- http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/gangs/4
- http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1640583,00.html
- Crime and Punishment Around the World: Volume 1, Africa, Mahesh Nalla (p. 334)
- http://www.vice.com/read/maori-v10n8  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.60.225 (talk) 05:19, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The black power gang is a criminal group
Talk:Bedroom in Arles

message: The Art Institute of Chicago has re-created the bedroom in an apartment in River North.  It can be stayed in overnight for ten dollars.  This is in conjunction with an exhibition of the artist's work.  (art institiut re-creates van gogh's room to rent, chicago trib, p. 1 of part 2, Feb. 11, 2016 and art institute's 'bedrooms' focuses on dutch artist's quest for home, pp. 1,5 of  section 4 of same paper64.53.191.77 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  second version 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Vincent van Gogh - Van Gogh's Bedroom in Arles - Google Art Project.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for July 8, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-07-08. Any improvements or maintenance to this article should be made before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:45, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Vincent van Gogh - Van Gogh's Bedroom in Arles - Google Art Project.jpg]] scheduled for POTD
Talk:Usenet II

message: This article appears to about a failed net movment.  When did it happen? Dalf | Talk 03:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It got off the ground in 1998; I'm not sure when you can say it definitely died, but groups.txt (the official list of Usenet II groups) hasn't changed since Wed Apr 28 22:09:35 CDT 1999. Rpresser 19:22, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  When?
Talk:Cum fart

message: I have restored the material material removed by the previous editor. 
Generally speaking, deletion of talk page material is encouraged only when absolutely necessary -- attack, libel, copyvio, gross profanity, and so forth. Also, I thought that the material was germane to the general history of the article. In deference to the sensibilities of the removing editor (and perhaps others), I edited the restored material to encompass a more genteel aspect, while retaining the sense of the original Herostratus 16:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: are you people f'ing serious? (unsigned|71.10.233.117}}
*Poorly phrased question, but yes, we're serious. Did you have a specific question about the article that you wanted to ask? -Harmil 15:10, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: An editor questions the seriousness of this article

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. Owen× ☎ 18:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: I thought that a "cream pie" was the same as an "internal cum shot" and that the only requirement was for a man to cum inside the vagina or rectum.  I didn't think it required the semen to come out at all.   Also, I'm quite sure queef only refers to air being released from the vagina, not the anus.  Comments? Lawyer2b 06:55, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding muscle involvement in semen expulsion, anatomically I would think a cum fart utilizes the same muscles as a "normal fart"; I have not heard of any semen specific rectal musculature, although a liquid being involved gives one pause.  For both that and gaseous composition, the Farting talk page participants might have some input.  The Felching entry doesn't mention semen injestion, only extraction.  Perhaps some experts can advise. Lawyer2b 16:27, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cum fart vs. Creampie and Queef vs. Fart 

message: This article is tagged for not being up to wikipedia standards, but I don't necessarily believe it is the article so much is the fact that there isn't enough information. Also it seems like a dictionary definition - at least a "slang" one - so maybe we should consider moving it or something. What do you think? Chooserr 01:02, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiktionary or Merge
Talk:Salt Pan Creek

message: I've uploaded a number of 'themed pictures', which could be used to set the atmosphere in a future reworking on this page. - Newhoggy 07:08, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work. I would like to question though, having 3 pictures on a very small article. They just make the text go all over the place. I am deleting the 3rd picture (the one with the dock or something in it), but will keep the large top one and the mangrooves. I think that there will be room for the picture again when the article reaches a decent size. De Mattia (talk) 01:42, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures
Talk:The Greatest Love of All

message: Why is this not an article about George Benson's original? (as it was released as a single). Even if they do have trivially different titles (removing/adding of 'the'), there would still be no need for a separate article. Does anyone else think this article needs to say a bit more about the original recording?Valerieg 01:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: George Benson????

message: added a 2-song release from Old Gold, a record label in Essex UK, and he added a 4-song release from Royalsound record label in Thailand. On these releases, according to www.45cat.com, the Benson tune is combined with hits from other artists. I would argue that these retread releases are trivial, that they should be removed as unimportant to the topic. Furthermore, 45cat is not reliable, because they allow users to change website content. Binksternet (talk) 16:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivial releases 

message: What about the Eddie Murphy version, with the band Sexual Chocolate, in the movie Coming to America? 87.49.147.70 (talk) 19:11, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version
Talk:Spear Luin

message: the description of the "element" of the spear seems to be an artifact of modern new age writers, rather than an accurate description of how the spear was viewed historically. though someone is attempting to overrule me on this, i do think that it is not appropriate to this article. i'll be happy to relent on this if someone can show a citation of an old source indicating that it was described as having an "element" of fire. Whateley23 07:32, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

message: i've looked, and i can find nothing from the extant tradition which supports the idea that Lugh's spear was equated with the Gae Bolg of Cúchulain. if someone can find a cite to support that, feel free to return the info, but without any citations, i felt it best to simply remove the probably spurious information. Whateley23 11:50, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gae Bolg? 

message: Am I right to think that the subject of this article and Spear of Lugh are the same, and should be merged? QuartierLatin1968  18:11, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: seems appropriate to me. Spear of Lugh is also the more likely name to look for. Whateley23 14:08, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:California State University, Los Angeles

message: Can some one update the US News ranking see link thanks. https://news.calstatela.edu/2021/09/13/cal-state-la-continues-remarkable-climb-in-u-s-news-world-report-rankings/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by USA Eagle01 (talk • contribs) 05:14, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Rankings
Talk:Spin-off

message: There should be a separate article on spin-off corporations because there's not really much connection with media spinoffs. I think that someone looking up "spin-off" probably has either media or corporations in mind, and isn't looking for a complete treatment of the concept. If they anyone is, a disambiguation page with a bit of an intro would work nicely. Either this page should just be a disambiguation page with "Spin-off (media)" and "Spin-off (corporation)" articles listed, or corporations should be split into "Spin-off Corporations". --AAMiller 01:02, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Love the irony! But seriously, two such hugely different contexts (in storied media vs. business), it definitely warrants two seperate articles, and a disambig.  Runa27 00:07, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The company section was already there , Spin out, moved media also to its own. reg . Mion 12:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can somenone wikify  Spin out ? . Mion 12:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Spinning off a new article

message: The entry about Trapper John M.D. dosn't make any cense.Bow down and pay taxes to your king. 05:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: I'm surprised this page does not mention the technological spin-offs derived from e.g. space projects. Philcha 11:42, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What about spin-off technologies?

message: I removed:
: In most television spin-offs, atleast one major character from the original show is not a major in the spin-off. They may be referenced, or guest-star.
Because, frankly, it doesn't make sense, is unclear and is covered better on the media spin-offs page.  I also think that it's preferencing shows that are retooled after a character leaves, rather than, say a show based around a character that leave... but, once again, it doesn't really make sense, so I'm not sure. Duggy 1138 (talk) 04:24, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media Spin-off 

message: Does anyone really refer to a schism as a "spinoff"? —Tamfang (talk) 00:05, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  religion
Talk:Playing time (cricket)

message: I think this should be a part of the cricket article, its not really worthy of its own article.
: I disagree. It's a huge article, despite how seemingly insignificant the subject is, and would only serve to make the main cricket article harder to read.  plattopustalk 11:46, August 27, 2005 (UTC)
===Gloaming in Karachi===
Is it just me, or does this part of the article seem irrelevant and over-long?
Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:17, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it just me, or does this part of the article seem irrelevant and over-long?
Doctorhawkes (talk) 01:17, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Gloaming in Karachi
Talk:Australian cuisine

message: I'm not entirely happy with the merge from Modern Australian, since the merged article currently conflates two separate things: small-m modern Australian as in what regular people eat, and capital-m Modern Australian/Mod Oz as in the fancy fusion restaurant food pioneered by Tetsuya & co.  These really should be separated out. Jpatokal (talk) 04:02, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern vs modern
Talk:Richard S. Castellano

message: His filmogrophy needs to be updated.. just copy it from http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0144710/ basically..if anyone's not lazy like i am. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by  65.92.40.160 (talk • contribs) 19:41, August 27, 2005  (UTC)
: No, do not copy and paste it from IMDb. It is a copyvio and is illegal and against wiki policy. Sarah Ewart 00:29, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled