Talk:Pink Flamingos

message: The picture and caption should be removed, it's a total spoiler. I've not seen the movie and just came here to check it out before getting it. 89.124.111.173 19:32, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: a musical scene with a fully exposed gesticulating anus
I think that needs clarification because I have no idea what that means.  I plan to watch the movie soon and improve it.
are you talking about rarg?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.10.118.184 (talk) 10:49, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: "Divine and the other partygoers beat the four policemen to death and eat them alive" makes no sense 65.95.57.183 (talk) 22:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Fixed a bunch of minor errors and streamlined it a littleMjpresson (talk) 19:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot edits 

message: The opening paragraph states that the tagline is: "An exercise in bad taste."  However, the billboard picture on the page clearly states that the tagline is: "An exercise in POOR taste."  So which is it?  Thanks.13:38, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Poor" or "Bad" Taste? 

message: Well I don't know about "It was eventually released on VHS in Australia in the late 1980s with a X rating" because this film, along with all the John Waters films, showed regularly at cinemas like the Valhalla cinema in Glebe all through the 1980s. I saw it in about 1983 there along with the other Waters films (Female Trouble, Desperate Living, Polyester). 60.242.240.63 (talk) 04:23, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Banned 

message: I happen to have a copy of the book Trash Trio, which includes the script to the formerly proposed sequel "Flamingos Forever," a title displayed proudly on the cover. Therefore all the CN tags should be removed. ----DanTD 16:41, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flamingos Forever: The Proposed Sequel 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0069089/trivia. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 01:19, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: For what it's worth, all works published before 1923 (as Rite of Spring was, in the U.K.) are in the public domain in the U.S., but not in the U.K. (author's life + 70  years). As evidence that the U.K. copyright does not protect the work in the United States, Dover Publications published in 2005 a piano four hands version (see http://worldcat.org), and Dover publishes public domain things, rarely paying royalties. deisenbe (talk) 04:19, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rite of Spring 

message: I clicked on citation for Kiddie Flamingos and realized most of Wikipedia section repeats source nearly verbatim. This same issue also occurs in first sentence of first and second paragraphs of Plot summary.
Imitation may indeed be the sincerest form of flattery, but copying someone else's material is a violation of copyright laws.
Please help rewrite these sections to avoid copyright violations.
I may do this eventually, but right now I'm tapped out after dozens of edits to this article (and somewhat hobbled by editing on my phone). Thanks, filth fans! Kinkyturnip (talk) 03:58, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright issues 

message: Shouldn't there it be a disambiguation page for "Ping Flamingos". People may get confused when looking for  pink flamingos (the animals).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrincodi (talk • contribs) 15:41, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a hatnote. I think it's possible someone looking for Flamingo or Plastic flamingo could type in "Pink Flamingos". The other items on the dab page are less likely. No one is going to come here looking for Flamingo International Airport. GA-RT-22 (talk) 04:42, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page? 

message: The film has one unusual feature that's a little less controversial than its many other unusual features: the credits for cast and crew are exceptionally long - particularly for a small, independent film with no special effects - because nearly every individual appearing on screen is specifically identified. With one exception -- last I read, the gentleman who plays the contortionist at Babs's birthday party has never been identified -- with John Waters commenting "for obvious reasons." I will see if I can find citations for any of this information and -- if the material seems noteworthy -- add it to the article. PurpleChez (talk) 19:37, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  cast