lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:UN Trade and Development

message: There is this insistance of putting in this joke about the acronym ("under no cirumstance take any decisions"). While I personally find it funny, I don't see how it can qualify as an encyclopedic entry. Before re-inserting it, can those that insist on this make a documented reference to one or several news articles, with a url, that attribute the joke to someone that activiely participates in the work of UN organizations. To clarify somewhat, only UN agencies that are keepers of an international regime (such as the WTO - trade regime; WIPO - Intelectual Property regime; World Bank & IMF - international financial regime and the Security Council - Peace and Security Regime) or are funding Agencies (UNDP) actually take any kind of real decisions. UNCTAD is not in this category.  --Modi 07:50, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Would there be any objection if I re-ordered the opening section? It seems to ramble. Respublicans (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidy up introduction 
Category talk:Works based on Harry Potter

message: *This category was previously named :Category:Harry Potter parodies before being listed for deletion on April 5, 2005. The following discussion from CFD is now closed and should not be modified.
Had only three entries, one of which wasn't actually a parody. Merged to main Harry Potter category for lack of content.  Radiant_* 07:50, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC) I can see the point of this category, but its name is too narrow. I propose that it be renamed to Harry Potter derived works (since every parody is derived, but not every derivation is parodic).  Radiant_* 08:33, Apr 6, 2005 (UTC)
*Keep and restore inappropriately-removed contents. It is unfortunate that you have ignored the instructions in the very notice you yourself placed on the category:Please do not remove this notice or empty the category while the question is being consideredAs it is, the three articles you have moved are now in the main Harry Potter category which is wholly inappropriate for any of them. --Phil | Talk 13:30, Apr 5, 2005 (UTC)
*Weak delete.  Not to nitpick, but the category might have been emptied prior to posting this for cfd, which would have been following the letter, if not the spirit, of the "notice".  -Kbdank71 14:30, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Former category name
Talk:Xenozoic Tales

message: :See also Talk:Cadillacs and Dinosaurs (video game).
Note the existence of an unwikified linkless article at Cadillacs and Dinosaurs - T.V. Show -- Infrogmation 15:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Tipping Point (disambiguation)

message: A term in sociology referring to the moment when something unique becomes common. There is a problem with this, as something that is unique is, by definition, the only one. Between being unique and being common, there must be other phases like "exclusive", "rare", "scarce" or "elitist", according to the entity under discussion. Or else, the "moment" is a period rather than an instant in time. Notinasnaid 08:42, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pedant's corner
Talk:The Tempest (disambiguation)

message: Should The Tempest disambiguation be merged with Tempest disambiguation page? Cacofonie 17:47, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so.  I think the disambig page is useful, and not all uses of the words refer to Shakespeare's play.  -- Ssilvers 17:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I think so. Why have two pages. Pepto gecko 19:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Carascon

message: I have deleted "It is a very unique name in both Italy and Spain." I am not sure what was intended, but (a) nothing can be very unique (b) something that is unique must have only a single example, so I can't see how it can be in two places. Notinasnaid 08:45, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lake Buena Vista, Florida

message: I was poking around in the Reedy Creek Improvement District article & came across the maps. After seeing this & Bay Lake, Florida, I searched the aerial photos for what would be the trailer parks described in the articles: I found them & replaced the aerial map links with the new ones, relegating the original to the Reedy Creek article, which had none.
Cwolfsheep 09:12, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: See also User talk:Moreau36.
 shows the 1990 borders. The area southeast of I-4 is no longer part of the city; it was deannexed after being developed. Additionally the bit east of 535 and north of I-4 (Crossroads shopping center) was also deannexed. The rest is still part of LBV.
West of 535 and south of I-4 has been developed as the Vista Way apartments and a few restaurants. And hell yes.  shows that the apartments were built starting in 1988!
East of 535 is the Little Lake Bryan area, which has also been developed as apartments, but in the late 1990s.
Well it looks like it's been solved. --SPUI (talk) 19:26, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Population history

message: It would be nice to have a map showing the city's location with respect to the RCID and neighboring municipalities. -- Beland 22:13, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map request
Wikipedia talk:Files for deletion/KateWinsletTitanic

message: All I did was ask a question at the 'Pump. What have I done ? I have created a Monster debate ! -- 09:12, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Long live Wiki. JFW | T@lk 10:22, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: You've shown that Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion does not really function as a forum, but that the people improving individual article pages (e.g. Titanic (1997 film)) can still work together and reach a compromise which helps build an encyclopedia. --Audiovideo 12:52, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, the Titanic (1997 film) page now is actually a better page to read without the distracting nudity on it.  Maybe I should've signed in and take some credit for this. Hahaha... -- 20:39, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Kosovo Polje

message: The name Kosovo Polje was before 1999, when Kosovo was freed from Serb conqueror, the name changed to Fushë Kosovë
Fatcs:
*https://kk.rks-gov.net/fushekosove/ - The city government website
*https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/kosovo The map from gov.uk UK government
*https://www.britannica.com/place/Kosovo an article for Kosovo, The Encyclopædia Britannica
*http://maps.worldbank.org/p2e/mcmap/map.html?org=ibrd&level=country&code=XK&title=Kosovo  Map from Worldbank
*Kosovo Polje is in serbian language, in this city 86.9% are albanians and 0.9% are serbs so the city must be in albanian language
*Kosovo Polje is the 2nd name of city according to the constitution of Kosovo, respecting the Serbian language, which is the secondary language in Kosovo.
I will move this page to Fushë Kosova because these facts are from reliable source, in accordance with the rules of Wikipedia.
--Hakuli (talk) 15:37, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you are not allowed just to move article, as that is not normal way of communication. You incredible political bias is already clear in you first sentence, so it would be best if you can just step away from this article, as wikipedia should not be used as political battleground, but as a neutral encyclopedia. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 10:35, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: In this diff the RM discussion was closed as "not moved" to Fushe Kosova because  I am objected to renaming based on the consensus reached at that discussion.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:44, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

text: I do not understand the english Wikipedia, it is to consider the argue that the city have a albanian majority. I would not like to interrupt/starting edit-war and would say: do not move back the article name. Could you clarify for what WP:COMMONNAME is? There is not described anything for names of cities in this case. --ElmedinRKS (talk) 21:58, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Mate Belgrade has Serbian majority and yet name in English is derived from Bulgarian name for this city (Belgrad), but not Beograd which is Serbina name and yet no one minds since Belgrade is common name, so I do not know what's there not to be understood. This is just an example, but of course I encourage you to have your own attitude toward this and at the same time you should try to understand other approaches. Cheers. --S T E V A N (talk) 16:44, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Kosovo Polje to Fushë Kosova
Talk:Mri (fictional alien species)

message: I can't say I was expecting to find this! I was searching for Manchester Royal Infirmary (MRI), but thought that I might get results about MRI scanners. But I've never heard of this 'Mri' thing before at all. Would it be worth someone creating a disambiguation page, because MRI is the acronym for several things (Member of the Royal Institute is another that springs to mind).
Agreed that it's silly to have this as the default hit for mri 24.181.29.106
This should not be the default hit for Mri.
Yes, that this is the first result when searching for MRI is total foolishness. Much as I appreciate Cherryh's writing, I hardly think that this is what most people are looking for when they punch in 'mri'.
I noticed that this fictional alien species was linked to by less than 6 total pages, whereas Magnetic resonance imaging was linked to be scores and scores of pages. It only seemed logical to move this page to a more suitable title, and redirect mri to Magnetic resonance imaging. --Porqin 20:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: Shouldn't "mri" be "Mri"? -- Whane 02:57, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper names and titles
Talk:Aberford

message: Article added to Wikipedia, more details to be added as and when I have the time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.252.224.17 (talk • contribs) 22:08, 18 April 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Added Becca Hall to list of local features —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.252.224.17 (talk • contribs) 10:17, 17 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The bulleted list is the main problem, made worse by the image it flows around. Also not clear is the parlington estate section - would this not be better in the parlington hall article. Use of Template:main to link to related articles in subsections might help here.Sf5xeplus (talk) 22:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Jessica Alba

message: How it is it possible to categorize her as Jewish? Her father has Jewish mitochondrial DNA. ALL mitochondrial DNA is inherited from the mother. I know this is original research but OR is permitted on talk pages. This leads to the further deduction that's she's related to Alan Dershowitz which is patently falsifiable. Hope someone can clean this up one day. Wlmg (talk) 15:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorized as Jewish
Talk:Jean Étienne Valluy

message: I would like to rename this page to reflect the way Jean Etienne Valluy spelled his name. I had problems when I tried to rename it myself because the French Wikipedia entry for him has the same name. Is there a way for both pages to have the same name? I do not want to merge them. Ptrickf (talk) 14:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Is it Jean-Etienne or Jean Etienne (without the "-")? I made a redirect for Jean Etienne Valluy to here. But as far as I know (i.e. not much), it could just as well have have been made the other way around. Shanes 10:40, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Jean-Etienne or Jean Etienne?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Islamofascism

message: Drive-by-VfDs and topics with the slightest complexity are mutually exclusive. El_C 11:20, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Heavy image. Oddly appropriate, though; thanks for placing it here. BrandonYusufToropov 14:36, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Bah
Talk:Baden bei Wien

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 01:47, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Population (2002) 31,000" (in first paragraph) contradicts the number given in the infobox (clem 11:51, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Anybody know the real number? Ksenon 06:47, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to go ahead and change the first paragraph and the infobox to read 25,207.  I found the information on the official website . -Maaya まあや 17:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: Baden-Baden is in Germany ( Baden-Wuertenberg), Baden in Austria (near Wien)  and Baden in Switzerland. reni von bifamo--82.113.4.33 (talk) 08:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baden, Baden-Baden geographie 

message: Mozart's famous motet Ave verum corpus was probably premiered in St. Stephan, Baden, - how to include? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mozart 
Talk:Communist Party of the Menadores

message: Can anyone give a decent translation of this name into English? --Soman 11:55, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Angus L. Macdonald Bridge

message: Halifax Regional Minicipality is not the place Halifax  . Its mis leading to reference the bridge goping to the Halifax Regional Municipality when the actual place is Halifax the former city .
--Pat 22:50, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  HRM is not Halifax

message: Fixed the caption on the picture from looking toward Dartmouth to looking toward Halifax. Also fixed a broken link in the External Links section. uberdog 12:30, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo caption and links

message: Is the disappearance of this individual deserving of mention on this article, particularly when it is only presumed that since his bicycle was found on or near the bridge that he jumped off the bridge?  Perhaps it could be generalized to say that the bridge is the only cross-harbour bridge with a pedestrian walkway and therefore is considered a potential suicide landmark?  The Golden Gate Bridge's entry (one of the most notorious suicide landmark in the world) doesn't mention specific cases in this fashion, nor do other bridge articles. Seems a bit unsavoury to me... Plasma east 06:17, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm removing the reference to Gomberg as this is unsubstantiated speculation.  Many large bridges featuring pedestrian walkways are suicide landmarks and the Macdonald bridge does not deserve to be singled out in this fashion.Plasma east 02:38, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Gomberg's disappearance
Talk:Wind-up

message: This was a classic internet wind-up, which the owners of Starbucks have tried to quash. They took the owners of the web site to court in 2004 but, so far (June 2005), the link still works. Someone took the http://www.starbuckscoffee.co.uk link off the wind-up wikipedia article page in January 2005, either because they didn't like the offensive nature of the link or because they anticipated its demise. That fact that it's still there prompted this discussion page submission. Whether or not you are offended by the wind-up merchant's effacement of the Starbucks logo, it remains a cardinal example of what a wind-up is. Matt Stan 12:33, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I actually deleted because it doesn't really enhance the article. Having the link just promotes that particular cause, and doesn't help to explain wind-ups in general. If it was a site reviewing lots of pranks, that would be fine, but generally I think external links should be kept to an minimum. sjorford →•← 14:48, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: www.starbuckscoffee.co.uk

message: I took out the cleanup tag, which had been there for ages. If someone really cares about this, then it might be better to actually do the clean-up, or at least indicate what needs cleaning up, rather than shoving a rather pointelss banner on the page itself. (It was pointless because it didn't achieve any effect.) Matt Stan 18:01, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: cleanup
Talk:Tricameralism

message: The section on Chinese tricameralism should be reviewed for things like singular/plural agreement ("has/have"), unexpected shifting between present and past tenses, and general tone and accuracy. Thanks. --Lambent Ametrine (talk) 11:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for proofreading

message: Didn't England's Parliament originally have three houses - the Lords, Commons, and House of Knights or something that was eventually merged into the House of Lords? Kuralyov 00:48, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: House of Knights

message: The European Union is not tricameral because the European Commission is the executive arm of the EU.  --myselfalso 03:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's more like the Union's civil service, but yeah, definitely not a third chamber. I've removed it. —Nightstallion (?) 19:34, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  EU 

message: Added a section (with references) for labor unions.
J. J. in PA 00:30, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unions

message: Should there be any mention of the defunct Parliament of Scotland along with French tricameralism? Although it was a unicameral body, like the French estates it was made up of different estates of clergy/nobles and elected or appointed commissioners with the "Lords of the Articles" drafting legislation for the scrutiny of the Estates. Not true Tricameralism, but worth a paragraph? Benson85 01:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Three Estates in Scotland 

message: From 1938 until 1991, the Soviet Union's legislature was the bicameral Supreme Soviet but in 1989, the Congress of People's Deputies was created and replaced the former as the supreme legislative body but it continued to exist alongside the latter. Does this count as tricameralism? Charles Essie (talk) 01:12, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Soviet Union

message: Up until the Chinese tricameralism section, there is a severe lack of citation in the examples shown on the page. Does anybody know where the information presented is coming from? Like official government documents? BlueBlurHog (talk) 16:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of citation
Talk:Battle of San Romano

message: Reminder to one self - locate the artwork and break this off into its own article.  Lotsofissues 12:41, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Megaplex

message: According to http://investors.kinepolis.com//index.cfm?PageID=15859, the first megaplex opened in 1988 in Brussels. That page is biased of course, so there is a chance that their to be the first is not correct; however, there is no reason to doubt that Kinepolis Brussels opened in 1988, which beats The Grand 24 in Dallas by 7 years.
Rschroev 12:43, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: I would say yes they should join ... there is very little under Multiplex and a Multiplex is just a small Megaplex.
They tend to share the same features, it is just one has less than the other - from my perception, however, I could stand corrected. notna uk 16:41, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Join? or not to Join?
Talk:Loyal opposition

message: The article presently reads: the leader of the largest minority party in Parliament is termed "The Leader of Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition".  I am changing this text, as the present leader of the largest minority party in Canada's present Parliament happens to be termed "The Prime Minister of Canada". 216.126.78.119 12:44, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

message: We all know who leads the EU. But where is its 'loyal opposition'? Crawiki (talk) 16:26, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the EU follow this principle?
Talk:Free-radical addition

message: The radicals should not have negative charges.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.164.142.143 (talk) 13:09, 17 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Radicals

message: Perhaps a better picture demonstrating that the reaction causes the Br to go to the less substituted carbon atom of the alkene would better illustrate the anti-Markovnikov regiochemistry. 
Andrew4010 04:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Showing R3=R4=H would be more clear. I'll work on generating the image. Atomjockey (talk) 23:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Does not show anti-Markovnikov

message: In the step where the nitrite radical leaves from the ketyl, there is an abundant oxygen that wasn't there in the last step, likely to be caused by author's attempt to draw out the bond for the mechanism but forgetting to remove the oxygen from "ONO2" after. Natriumcyanid (talk) 19:32, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra oxygen atom in self-terminating radical cyclization scheme
Talk:National Museums Liverpool

message: "is England's only national collection". Of what? Where's the detail? Jez 13:28, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hit to Death in the Future Head

message: Yeah, the genre here reads Indie Rock, but right below that it says that they're on a major label. Hardly indie. In fact, the exact opposite of indie.
:Yeah, can't be Indie rock on a Major Label  - 211.30.230.15 (talk) 06:41, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indie rock as a genre isn't really defined by label type anymore.  Just like the term "alternative", it's been absorbed to reflect a general sound.  That's why we have separate articles on Indie rock and Indie (music). —Torc. (Talk.) 08:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmmm... 

message: Any info on why this album was given one?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.239.213.135 (talk) 07:12, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parental Advisory