lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vallipuram

message: This article contain some doubtful facts those should be referenced with good sources. I tag them with my recent edits. Waiting some days until someone come to address them. An addition of controversial facts has been done with this edit by a user.--L Manju (talk) 03:28, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy?

message: Article states:
"The exact details of the temple complex are not known, and the famous 'Vallipuram" Buddha statue built with Dravidian sculptural traditions from Amaravathi village, Guntur district was found in excavations below the Hindu Temple. The language of the inscription is Tamil-Prakrit,[citation needed] which shares several similarities with script inscriptions used in Andhra at the time.[citation needed]"
Please note that 
* 'Vallipuram" Buddha statue (http://serendib.btoptions.lk/cpanel/uploader/2077/BTIR9705.jpg) follows the older conventions of Indian Buddhist sculptures. The oldest Buddhist statues in Sri Lanka, as well as in SE Asia (see http://www.chinabuddhismencyclopedia.com/en/images/e/e2/Sulawesi.jpg), reflect the Indian conventions. Yes, it is similar to Amravati sculptures, as are other Buddhist statues in Sri Lanka.
* Language of the inscription is clearly a form of Prakrit/Pali. Simhala language is derived from Prakrit. Thus it can be said to be early Simhala.
* there is considerable cultural, racial and linguistic continuity between India, specially South India, and Sri lanka.
Malaiya (talk) 00:59, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Excavations
Talk:Warchalking

message: "A well-known photograph of such a warchalk symbol was created by Jones's colleague Ben Hammersley, and has been widely reproduced."
Is there any point in mentioning this if there isn't a copy of the image?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.152.115.183 (talk) 05:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as it details the history of the practice, and documents a picture many may be familiar --58.110.131.238 01:32, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: I've heard that warchalking has never really caught-on. Personally, I have never seen it in any form. If it's geographic, then where? Rsduhamel (talk) 20:47, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably because people can check if there's a wifi network around using their phones now...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.101.193.31 (talk) 00:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Nobody has ever seen a real war chalk. It was just a media hype. 78.43.215.75 (talk) 20:43, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How wide-spread is this? 
Talk:Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

message: It appears that piracetam reduces lipofuscin in rats. (Paula-Barbosa, M. et al (1991) "The effects of Piracetam on lipofuscin of the rat cerebellar and hippocampa; neurons after long-term alcohol treatment and withdrawal"  Alcoholism:Clin Exp Res 15, 834-38.)  Surely, it must have some effect on NCL? If not, then why not? Is the rat study reaching a wrong conclusion? linas 18:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please discuss at Talk:Batten disease. linas 19:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Piracetam

message: doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30368-5 JFW | T@lk 17:08, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lancet Neurol
Talk:James P. Cannon

message: I note that the article is locked for editing, but I think it needs to mentioned there that Cannon played a leading role in building solidarity and support for Sacco & Vanzetti as the head of the ILD and got to know both men personally.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6045:E3:5CE4:99C4:229F:DE6E (talk) 22:22, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Sacco & Vanzetti
Talk:Gateway High School (Florida)

message: I am a student from Gateway High School and my Emergent Tech class received an extra credit assignment to contribute to this page. There may be a high number of edits this weekend by other students doing the assignment. If there is any vandalism or bad editing in the upcoming days, it may be by my classmates and if you need to revert the page, then please leave a note in the page history explaining the problem so that they can learn from their mistakes. I just wanted to make sure that you were all aware of this. Thank you.
Onthenet9999 20:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computer Class Assignment 

message: There is a standard for school articles on Wikipedia.  You will find it here.  Extracurricular activities should be listed.  No individual faculty or students are to be mentioned.  Accomplishments made by extracurricular activities to be listed are to be limited to accomplishments like state or national championships and must be referenced to reliable sources.
This is an encyclopedia article.  It is NOT a PR page for the school it is on.  The school website or a blog is the place for that kind of material.  Neither is it the property of the school.  The students at the school have no more, or less, right to edit it than any other.  Said students are also constrained by the policies and guidelines adopted on Wikipedia just like anyone else.  Please keep your edits within the guidelines and realize that this isn't the place to promote your favorite activity or teacher.  Information on Wikipedia is required to be verifiable and sourced to reliable sources.  Thank you for your cooperation. Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:40, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Talk:John George (racing driver)

message: Section should be in chronological order. Jonathan McLeod (talk) 14:45, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BTCC 
Talk:Patriarchal Stavropegic Monastery of St John the Baptist

message: It would be useful to have some description of how the men and women are separated - different buildings on the property, different wings, or not at all -  and united - eg Liturgy, work, meals, etc.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 22:41, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  how are men and women separated, united 

message: For instance the "original" Byzantine one from the traditional place of Jesus' baptism (Al-Maghtas), also known in Arabic as Qasr el Yahud. Eastern Orthodoxy knows several other such monasteries. Concentrating only on the English one is a bit, let's say, narrow-sighted. Please fix this. Thanks! Arminden (talk) 17:43, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is "Monastery of St John the Baptist" autom. linked here? Plenty of such monasteries, several far more deserving!
Talk:2008 hurricane season

message: Considering this is a disambg page, why not allow "2008 Miami Hurricanes football season"? It certainly makes some sense that a random search result would lead a Hurricane fan to this page. I'm curious about why you insist that a "see also" link couldn't be placed here? SpikeJones (talk) 19:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand why not, either. 24.219.183.85 (talk) 21:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, maybe not. Why not make it as easy as possible? 24.219.183.85 (talk) 20:08, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because in WP-land, plurals are usually assumed/ignored.  That is, "hurricane" = "hurricanes".  For example, hurricanes should point to the same place as hurricane. Check it out yourself: hurricanes vs hurricane. SpikeJones (talk) 14:53, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question for ShadowRanger

message: Because of the recent edit-warring, this page is protected from editing for five days. Please use the time to come an agreement on what the page should contain. CIreland (talk) 15:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The page needs to stay the way it was created, this is how all of them have been in the past, so why change it now.---Shadow (talk) 02:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You bring up a good point about other pages that are missing links.  Who wants to tag all the other DISAMBIG pages to include other "200x Hurricane" references?  I'll do it if there are no other volunteers to help out. SpikeJones (talk) 03:20, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can do some too. 147.136.249.101 (talk) 04:03, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Using the list of years on the Hurricane football seasons template as a guide, I filled in links on those disamb pages to the appropriate pages of 2001-2008.  There aren't that many WP pages in general that this needs to be added to as those pages don't exist; feel free to add the others that do exist if you feel like it. SpikeJones (talk) 04:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

text: No, I understood what you meant. However, this is a disambig page - intended to direct users who type in one thing to the page that they really mean.  It so happens that the page term that was chosen is similar enough to a non-weather topic that it makes complete sense to add that link to this disambig page.  I point you to disambiguation guidelines that clearly states why this page qualifies to have both weather and sports info on it (Only add links to articles that could use essentially the same title as the disambiguated term. Disambiguation pages are not search indices.).  If you have questions about the specific policy listed there, please feel free to ask. SpikeJones (talk) 20:30, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page protection
Talk:Boxer Codex

message: The picture of the man with the giant sword is a Brunei warrior not a visayan.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.147.20.110 (talk) 10:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brunei warrior 

message: This section seems lacking. I found an article describing the possible provenance of the manuscript, its account of the voyage of Miguel Roxo de Brito, the timeline when it was brought to Spain from the Philippines, possibly by Hernando de los Ríos Coronel, and some evidence from the binding (its well-preserved condition, use of sheep leather binding, Boxer himself noting that the binding "is of a familiar late sixteenth/early seventeenth century Iberian type" that suggests that the manuscript was taken to Spain and bound in Spain early, at least 1614. Here is the article: John N. Crossley - The Early History of the Boxer Codex Or would this be considered not established info yet and so not fit to be included in the wiki? Quidquidlatetadparebit (talk) 18:11, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provenance 

message: The file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:大連_Tohany_-_Manchu_couple_from_Dalian,_China_-_Boxer_Codex_(1590).jpg I believe has been erroneously labelled as "Manchu Noble with Wife from Dalian (then ruled by Ming Dynasty China)". The original description from page 145 of the codex reads "Tohani es rreyno de por si junto a Tampochia. Es tanbien muy abundante de pimienta.", which would make them adjacent only to Kampuchea https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:柬埔寨_Tampochia_-_Couple_from_Cambodia_-_Boxer_Codex_(1590).jpg.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.17.70.53 (talk) 06:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tohany Mislabeling
Talk:River Atlético Clube

message: The article talks about "Commendator" and "kits". Does "kits" refer to jerseys?
What is a "commendator". There is no such word in English although there is "commendatore" in Italian, a word that may or may not mean the same the OP wanted. The link points to a Middle-Ages religious patronage, which does not seem to have much relation to 20th century history. This section needs revision. Alexf(t/c) 19:10, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I used the word "kits" because it is how it is referred in the Template:Football kit and it not refers to just the jerseys, but also includes all the soccerwear. The word "commendator" actually exists in English. Check this link. The wikilink is correct, as you can also see checking the previously mentioned link. --Carioca 01:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Edinburgh bus station

message: This should be St Andrew's Square Bus Station.  Brendandh 19:10, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A lot of the Scotsman links referring to post-construction issues in the Bus Station are now dead, and I've had difficulty finding alternative sources - there's this less detailed article from the New Civil Engineer. There may well be more that can be found in court records that I don't know about. What happened to the case? @versumDisco (talk) 15:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edinburgh Council vs Balfour Beatty 2011
Talk:Oliver Bulleid

message: I'm not entirely convinced the use of BFB wheels eliminates the need for balance weights. The BFB wheel provides better support for the tyre. Balance is a totally different matter. 7severn7 (talk) 08:36, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No. The 'Leader' did have sleeve valves, but the Pacifics had more conventional piston valves. 86.178.185.233 (talk) 01:55, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: True, have removed the offending words. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:47, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sleeve valves on the Pacifics? 

message: Is Bulleid Way (near London Victoria station) named after Bulleid and if so is it worth putting in the article? Tombomp (talk/contribs) 20:45, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It almost certainly is; but we need a reliable source which explicitly states that. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:59, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulleid Way 

message: Did Bulleid not have a role in the design of the BR(SR) 1Co-Co1 diesel locomotives (nos. 10201/2/3)? Barney Bruchstein (talk) 18:41, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  1Co-Co1 Diesels 

message: "During this time, he was able to travel widely in Europe, including a trip with Gresley, Stanier and Hawksworth, to Belgium, to see a metre-gauge bogie locomotive."
I guess the companions were Nigel Gresley, William Stanier and Frederick Hawksworth, but am I right? If so, I think additional and moved wikilinks are in order. Harfarhs (talk) 04:06, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It is difficult to imagine which other Gresley, Stainier, and Hawksworth the author could have meant. Pinkbeast (talk) 11:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed it is difficult, but it would be bad practice to make the alteration on the strength of an assumption. Harfarhs (talk) 00:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we do have WP:V and WP:NOR, however it's sourced to steamindex, which does occasionally refer to various people by surname only; I don't often invoke WP:IAR but in this case I have . --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:50, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Period just before First World War
Talk:Rat Boy (Viz comic character)

message: The term 'Ratboy' was coined in British media in the 1990s to describe school-age, lower-class, persistent criminals, particularly burglars who can squeeze through the smallest window in any property and, invariably, leave a faecal deposit as a calling card.
The comic strip in Viz which began parodying such people, expanded to cover behaviour shown by those that are now known as 'chavs'. Thus the term Ratboy is now obselete.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.49.242.130 (talk) 12:18, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

message: I've proposed a page move that will affect this page.  Please comment at Talk:Rat Boy (musician) TSP (talk) 13:49, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move of [[Rat Boy (musician)]] to this location 
Talk:Fokker V.9

message: I have cross checked information on the site http://www.dutch-aviation.nl/index5/Military/index5-1%20Fokker%20Military%20Aircrafts.html against known published sources in my library. The site seems to have reliable and verifiable information. I have been trying to fill in some gaps in the Fokker coverage.Mark Lincoln 19:18, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sowerby family

message: Also science please, important to many fields and publications to wider audiences.  Fred ☻  19:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub bio 

message: John George Sowerby is routinely listed as a grandson of James Sowerby; however, I can't find him in the Sowerby line of descent. See, e.g., this source on the Sowerby genealogy. It would be helpful if someone could figure out where he fits in.Alafarge (talk) 17:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  John George Sowerby (1850-1914)
Talk:Manchester Hymnal

message: The redlinks on almost every hymn name in the list is excessive. It is highly unlikely that a significant portion of these hymns could be considered notable enough to merit their own article. -- 71.35.46.20 19:20, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have fixed--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 18:15, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Redlinks
Talk:CSI: London

message: Is this needed a the moment? This information is already on CSI franchise and as it stands there are no plans for this. When there are we can get this entry up and running but I think it is a bit premature given what we currently know. (Emperor 19:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually checking the franchise page and it seems the information was removed as it was seen to be too vague. (Emperor 19:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needed?
Talk:Jarlsberg

message: Is there any reason this article is using the rather dated term "countship" rather than "county"? I would just change it, but not sure if it's part of a larger series that it'd be good to maintain consistency with. MatthewWilkes (talk) 11:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Countship" 
Talk:Thwaite Hall

message: As somebody who used to live in Thwaite Hall myself (from 1985 to 1988) I think it would be good if this article stated how Colonel Goddard used to live in what is now a student's hall of residence. Vorbee (talk) 11:41, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Who s he, any reliable references to him that make him notable. Keith D (talk) 19:53, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Colonel Goddard
Talk:Ashwin Willemse

message: I belief this article needs citationsBarry Ne (talk) 05:12, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations needed
Talk:Jean Lanfray

message: The French most certainly banned absinthe and it occured before the start of WWI.  The French government even gave cash back if people turned in their bottles of now illegal liquor, the alcohol was then used to process gun-powder for the coming war.  I am curious where the information that germany banned absinthe for the french was found? -- Ari 01:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: French Ban

message: Surely he must be deceased.  Can some one source the date and change his categories to reflect that? - BalthCat 19:41, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead?
Talk:Duchess Maria Dorothea of Württemberg

message: I've removed the prod template (and tidied the other ones) as the subject of the article seems notable enough in the context of Hungarian/Belgian history, having been wife of the Palatine of Hungary and mother of the Queen Consort of Belgium. The prod's reasoning didn't appear to have taken this into account. Miremare 20:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it does say that in the article, and it did then too. Miremare 12:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod
Talk:Internet scavenger hunt

message: This article needs sections, including history, examples, link to scavenger hunt, and more.  It also needs to be clear about sourcing.  I'm not ready to call for a merge just yet but if it isn't cleaned up it probably should be merged into Scavenger hunt and the result cleaned up to make a single, high-quality article.  davidwr (talk)/(track) 19:53, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup required
Template talk:Counties of Norway (1919–2019)

message: The template is inaccurate, since Trøndelag was joined in 2017. I propose the title should be changed to Counties of Norway (1919-2017). -- Egil (talk)
In addition, Bergen was a county of its own until 1972, so maybe include that and change the title to Counties of Norway (1919). -- Egil (talk) 10:27, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: 2019 is wrong
Talk:Quinisext Council

message: This article was lifted almost word-for-word from the Catholic Encyclopedia (1908) and shows a strong anti-Orthodox bias. It needs to be re-edited to make it more NPOV. MishaPan 20:04, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree: the article is utterly unacceptable.81.211.44.171 (talk) 20:01, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it still needs work.  One problem: the status of Pope Hadrian's reference to the Canons of this council- a positive reference in a letter is not necessarily "accepting and confirming" them. Gabrielthursday (talk) 05:50, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I rewrote several chunks of the article, and added some information from a more neutral third party source.  Not sure about the objection regarding the source on Hadrian- it seems to have been moderated in the text.  I've pulled the NPOV tag for now as in my opinion it seems fairly balanced- add it back if someone disagrees.  --Clay Collier (talk) 12:28, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be a good idea to remove references (lifted from Catholic Encyclopedia) to Bede's work De sexta mundi aetate, since no such work exists - it may be referencing one of his many letters, but I cannot locate it anywhere in Migne's PL. 136.242.180.165 (talk) 16:30, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Might it be under a different title/name? The CE is a very reliable source, so I'd be shocked if it was made up out of whole cloth. Gabrielthursday (talk) 17:16, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

text: I see the reference has been removed, but for what it's worth, Bede did indeed condemn the Quinisextum as heretical. The modern title of his work is De temporum ratione (ed. Jones, Corpus christianorum 123B.538) CRolker (talk) 12:23, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

text: Hugely improved. Well done to everyone involved. I have removed the POV tag. -Ad Orientem (talk) 14:10, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Anthroposophical view of the human being

message: This article needs to be deleted also. Has no references at all except anthroposophical sources (disallowed in arbitration ruling on the Steiner/anthroposophy/Waldorf family of articles on wikipedia).DianaW 20:05, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong again, Diana. The Aritration ruling stated that for information that is not controversial, anthroposophical sources are allowed. See the ruling.  Thanks, Thebee 13:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Not quite; I created this article as a depository for existing material from the anthroposophy article that, it was agreed, was too detailed for the general article. I did no further work as we were going article by article in the clean-up. No one had suggested we turn to this one, yet, which also needs references. Time to work on it! Hgilbert 11:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I have provided references that meet arbitration guidelines for this article. Hgilbert 14:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: In an objective article correct definition should be stated first and not in the last section. Correct anthroposophical view of the human being is a sevenfold and well known fourfold view, and not the body soul and spirit thing, which is only a modern interpretation of profound spiritual truths given by Steiner. There should be  remark saying that Steiner's view is much more complex that possibly couldn't fit into a short encyclopedic article. This article  has little to do both with true spirit of anthroposophy and wikipedia for that matter. No wonder only English Wikipedia has this particular article.
--Gdje je nestala duša svijeta (talk) 16:44, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I placed the secondary sources and refimprove tag on this article because the vast vast vast majority of sources are in-universe. If these views of Steiner's philosophy don't have enough secondary-source coverage from not anthroposophists, then they aren't notable enough. If those secondary sources exist, they should be placed in this article. Also, the material itself is entirely drawn from these primary sources. It has no critical evaluation of the material. There are no critical views presented of Anthroposophic theory. I'd like to help fix that.--Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 20:13, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags