Talk:Grassroots democracy

message: I think there is a verb missing:
Grassroots democracy is a tendency towards designing political processes where as much decision-making authority as is practical ***is given*** to the organization's lowest geographic level of organization. Gakrivas 14:52, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice one. I changed this half a year later :) . Just goes to show that wiki thrives on action and not on talk . Be Bold ! :D  Regards Sean Heron 17:08, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence doesn't make sense 

message: If people who watch this page are also interested in how Wikipedia is governed, be sure to check out this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Advisory_Council_on_Project_Development . Slrubenstein   |  Talk 13:18, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI 

message: How is it that EZLN is considered both grassroots and participatory democracy
and most of the other ones are in both articles. Isn't grassroots built around mayors anyway?Domsta333 (talk) 09:13, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: I was looking at the articles on participation, and I noticed that they are not very coordinated and they overlap quite a bit.  I'm starting a discussion about this at Talk:Participation#Overlap_between_participation_articles.  Any help is appreciated!  MakeBelieveMonster (talk) 16:26, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlap between participation articles 

message: There are now articles for Grassroots and Grassroots democracy.  I think these are referring to the same thing.  Because I think it is better and because there is a precedent for including the latter into the democracy template, I propose that the content of grassroots be merged into grassroots democracy.  Any objections? Blue Rasberry 22:55, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Democracy (everyone gets to vote on everything) is grassroots by definition, making Grassroots Democracy redundant. Besides, grassroots has become a non-political term, too. The word is also used in social-change movements. I think a better idea is looking at how the text in Grassroots Democracy overlaps with the text in Democracy. Dan Bollinger (talk) 23:09, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

text: Per Max Mustermann & IP#24.193.60.231, Grassroots Democracy serves better as a branch of Grassroots.--JayJasper (talk) 18:48, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion

message: This article is somewhat general and written in a very basic manner. An expert would be appreciated to help or at least an editor capable of re-arranging/adding info into more logical subheadings. Minigoody101 (talk) 09:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure 'basic' is the word that I'd use - I could barely understand it. It would be useful if it was a little more accessible to people who aren't politically inclined.Weirdtheory (talk) 02:37, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not Encyclopedic 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grassroots democracy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150726172735/http://next-nexus.info/writing/politics/grassroots%20democracy.php to http://next-nexus.info/writing/politics/grassroots%20democracy.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified