Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mizzou

message: Sorry for all the confusion between WikiProject Mizzou and WikiProject University of Missouri.  I came to the conclusion that WikiProject Mizzou is a much better name.  There are still many broken links that will take some time to fix so for now both categorizes are listed under project categories. Grey Wanderer | Talk 12:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are four schools in the system.  Would it be out of line for there to be a University of Missouri wikiproject with four working groups?  Or should there just be four different wikiprojects?  I vote for the former, but I recognize your senority and personal relation to the topic.  I would like to start organizing a framework for the UMSL articles, and I think it would be easier if we just merged the campuses instead of dividing up the pool of editors.  I look forward to your response.  DaronDierkes (talk) 10:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See comments below at "other campus projects"-Grey Wanderer | Talk 01:35, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: project naming

message: Does anyone else think that Birchler Lab, wonderful as they are, does not belong at the end of all Mizzou articles?  I'm not a very good editor so if someone could remove that for me, I think our project will look more professional and organized.  Thanks!  Karen 20:02, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That said...they apparently weren't notable enough for a page... -Grey Wanderer | Talk 01:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birchler Lab

message: If a project gets off the ground for UMSL, UMKC, or what used to be called UMR, should it be a separate wikiproject or a working group of this project?  DaronDierkes (talk) 10:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm...I should have thought of this when I created this project originally, but at the time there were very few university WikiProjects and I didn't consider the possibility of people having interest in starting those projects.  This projects namespace, title, and structure are very MU specific, but that does not mean it couldn't be expanded to include the entire system.  But if there are enough editors involved, I like the idea of each school having a separate project, just for organizational purposes.  Do you think a UMSL project is likely to happen soon?  Any other editors out there have interest in that?-Grey Wanderer | Talk 01:30, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, the STL scene is pretty barren.  I make an edit on a Korean article and it is scrutinized by five guys in the first hour.  A change on a St. Louis article and nobody ever says anything.  Most pages list you as the only contributor.  Anyway, I'm more of the Build it and Let them Come frame of mind.  Like the St. Louis working groups.  I made them, now we will see if anybody contributes or edits the project pages.  I've got lots of ideas still so I'll merrily edit away until somebody steps in and talks to me about it.  For the UMSL project, I'm going to work on that on my own off and on.  If I get ambitious I will create the wikiproject pages, but I'll try to do a lot of the groundwork on the St. Louis Education working group page.  All this after I finish overhauling the category system which isn't very uniform yet.  As you may see, I've tried to make a specific category tree for each working group.  Busy busy busy.  As said I welcome your opinion.  DaronDierkes (talk) 02:14, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: other campus projects

message: As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level.  The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.
*The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.  
*The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.  
*A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.  
Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at :Category:C-Class_articles.  If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages.  The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles. 
Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme.  This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year.  Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:23, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Mizzou 

message: There is a request for comment about whether or not WP:BOOSTER documents a standard consensus and good practice that all editors and school/college/university articles should follow as an official policy or guideline. Madcoverboy (talk) 19:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC for [[WP:BOOSTER]] 

message: Hi!  I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate.  This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.
All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group.  If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 06:02, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinators' working group 

message: I'm trying to gauge the interested in created a Big 12 WikiProject and wondering who would like to be involved.  There are already pages for WikiProject Big Ten and WikiProject ACC.  A Big 12 project would cover the schools themselves and anything to do with conference sports including: events, rivalries, teams, seasons, championships and lore.  There is already quite a bit of activity here on Wikipedia regarding the Big 12, and I think a project could help coordinate and unify our efforts.  Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Big 12 if you are interested, and add your name to the list. Grey Wanderer (talk) 00:32, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Big 12 WikiProject

message: There is a discussion about if the page should exist at Talk:Missouri–Nebraska football rivalry if anyone is interested. Grey Wanderer (talk) 20:11, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mizzou-Nebraska rivalry

message: This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:37, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP 1.0 bot announcement 

message: Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone.  Articles were selected based on their assessed  importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.
We would like to ask you to review the Mizzou articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details.  You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.
We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010.  As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide.  Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback! 
For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 23:21, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mizzou articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release 

message: Short notice, I know, but if you are in town and interested in coming tomorrow evening, you're more than welcome.--Chaser (talk) 21:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Meetup/St. Louis]] 

message: I have nominated Barbara McClintock for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dana boomer (talk) 16:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR 

message: I have known every P&G CEO since the 1970's, and none of them were named Theodore Hellman. Here's a link to the names of every P&G CEO since 1890:
http://www.pg.com/en_US/downloads/media/Fact_Sheets_Leadership.pdf
I think you need to modify the Mizzou alumni list to correct this for Mr. Hellman.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.33.68.31 (talk) 21:57, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect alumnus association in Mizzou famous alumni list 

message: This project may be affected by a proposed consolidation of inactive and semi-active WikiProjects covering universities. The proposed consolidation is being discussed on the talk page of WikiProject Universities. We are seeking feedback from the projects that may be impacted before we decide on a course of action. Please drop by to participate in the discussion. Thanks! –Mabeenot (talk) 06:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion on consolidating inactive and semi-active university WikiProjects 

message: Hi all,
My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.
One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.
This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:
• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film
• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.
• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.
• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____
• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost
The deadline for submissions is 1st July 2014
For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to: 
Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 14:17, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leaflet for Wikiproject Mizzou at Wikimania 2014 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello! I would like to invite you to  a Wikipedia editathon about WWI and Dissent on November 22 at the National World War I Museum in Kansas City. Join us for the U.S. branch of this international event as we write more social history from the era around WWI into Wikipedia! All editors are welcome, contributors to topics around WWI other than Dissent also encouraged! Food and drinks will be supplied by the WWI museum, Sadads (talk) 21:38, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming event at the WWI Museum in Kansas City  

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: :Portal:University of Missouri, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/University portals and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of :Portal:University of Missouri during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:09, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any interest in recreating (and properly maintaining) this portal? Grey Wanderer (talk) 00:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: MfD nomination of [[:Portal:University of Missouri]]

message: I've requested a popular page report be generated for this project. Grey Wanderer (talk) 20:26, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Popular pages

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Eric Berger (meteorologist)#Requested move 8 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Eric Berger (meteorologist)#Requested move 8 January 2024]]