Talk:Haywards Heath

message: The Lindfield disambiguation article links here, mentioning that Lindfield is part of Haywards Heath. It seems strange that Lindfield doesn't get a mention in the article here, or have its own page; given that Lindfield has a lot more history to it.
:Agreed it seems strange that the Lindfield disambiguation page links to Haywards Heath as Lindfield is actually a separate village Population stats. When I have more free time I'll create a Lindfield stub article but others are quite welcome to do it before me if they wish Lindfield,_West_Sussex Heezy 11:26, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lindfield 

message: I took out the long list of places which were shown to make HH "one of the largest towns in West Sussex". Looking at the PDF file here, HH is way down; it seemed a pointless comparison in any case.  Listing the towns in alphabetical order doesn't help! Oh, and Arundel CP only has a population of 3,400 ... well below the 20,000+ of all the others Peter Shearan 15:52, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have noticed that the HH Council website wasn't included! Peter Shearan 15:56, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Population stats

message: An "Obsession with Dolphins"? Isn't that a bit much? It doesn't seem worthy of a mention, and it's a bit unencyclopedic... don't want to step on toes though. Hagger 19:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dolphins? 

message: During a Special Town council Meeting on 21st July 2008 the Town Council publicly agreed a critical landmark motion: To adopt the local Referendum result which asked MSDC to put development plans on HOLD. The motion was carried 9-3 with one abstention. Subsequent failure to ratify has left the Town Council in disarray. (Files copies held from the deputy Mayor confirm) Council promises and the resident mandate from this meeting not yet been delivered.
Several unsuccessful attempts to ratify this important motion, taken as a “recorded” vote with each councillor vote named and recorded. Unfortunately the resulting minutes were inaccurate and three subsequent Town Council meetings have failed to resolve the issue. It is alleged that control, compliance and leadership issues undermine credibility. Widely accepted standards of best practice have not yet been adopted, however debate is underway for a new constitution.
A group of concerned residents have formed The Haywards Heath Referendum Group [1], a strictly non-party political association with members drawn from the local community.
Following the hugely successful referendum another public meeting will be held at Clair Hall at 7:00 pm on Friday 12th September 2008.
Press & councillors have been invited to join the public at this most important update.<HHRG leaflet></Signed by HHRG>
All information inserted in this section can easily be verified via hard or soft copy and has been witnessed via public attendance at all meetings concerned. Email info@HaywardsHeaths-Referendum.com
Written by Jivebaby@lifebundle.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jivebaby (talk • contribs) 18:32, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because statements are verifiable does not make them NPOV.  It is VERIFIABLE that you have an opinion and that that opinion has been stated in public; but it is still your opinion.  The ENCYLCOPEDIC facts are that there is a plan to make changes, and that the plan is meeting resistance.  Any information further than that is NOT encyclpedic, and does not belong in the article.WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haywards Heath Referendum Group 

message: Drake/CharlesW RE The Broadway Group.
I note your deletion of the The Broadway Group posting from the Haywards Heath page and that this was one of many deletions or IMHO unilateral acts of vandalism by you. Perhaps it would be more productive to propose amendments to help balance the topic with a neutral, factual result rather than adopting your solo I-know-best approach and everyone else is wrong solution.
The (TBG) topic posted is a first attempt and whilst I note that you live a considerable distance from this area, your opinion is clearly strong enough to motivate your deletion it without engaging in a more constructive process which perhaps would be mutually beneficial. Bearing in mind, all of the information is local, specific to Haywards Heath and critically is verifiable, other than  adjustemnt of the prose or fundamental contradiction of the facts, I object to your methods, which I note from a quick glance of your history are far from discrete.
So please do not delete or substantially amend this entry without using the democraticaly appropriate and transparent Talk/discussion process.
Kind regards  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jivebaby (talk • contribs) 11:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Messages adressed personally to me should be placed on my talk page. The content you posted is unencyclopedic and I make no apology for removing it. Read the guidelines before editing and before accusing me of vandalism.--Charles (talk) 18:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Broadway Group 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Haywards Heath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608075926/http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf to http://www.westsussex.gov.uk/communityandliving/census2001/pop_parish_summary.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Haywards Heath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120531231742/http://www.midsussex.gov.uk/media/HHjune07-04context.pdf to http://www.midsussex.gov.uk/media/HHjune07-04context.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110527021412/http://www.midsussex.gov.uk/page.cfm?pageID=4313 to http://www.midsussex.gov.uk/page.cfm?pageID=4313
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131104154242/http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/stfrancishockeyclub/location/ to http://www.pitchero.com/clubs/stfrancishockeyclub/location/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070306173032/http://www.midsussextimes.co.uk/mk4custompages/custompage.aspx?pageID=21707 to http://www.midsussextimes.co.uk/mk4custompages/custompage.aspx?pageID=21707
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060926183419/http://www.midsussex.gov.uk/page.cfm?CFNoCache=TRUE&LANGUAGE=eng&pageID=4313 to http://www.midsussex.gov.uk/page.cfm?CFNoCache=TRUE&LANGUAGE=eng&pageID=4313
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified