Talk:Coda (music)

message: Who is Charles Burkhart (googling turns up <1,000 entries), and why are his comments notable?  Further, why is he linked to? Runnerupnj 11:22, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Charles Burkhart, until recently professor at CUNY, is an internationally recognized expert on Schenkerian analysis and author of numerous music textbooks, especially  Anthology for Musical Analysis. —Wahoofive (talk) 17:06, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you write a stub on him? It always looks funny when someone is cited as a reference and there is a red link on their name. Rigadoun 23:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Burkhart

message: It seems to me that a simple list of songs including codas will be too long and lacking organization; perhaps it is better to explain, on a song by song basis, which section is the coda and how it is differentiated from the rest of the song. Rigadoun 23:47, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good suggestion. However, the examples section is not meant to be an exhaustive list - It's purpose is to provide the user with (only a couple of) examples, so that he/she can listen to them, and be satisfied with something more tangible than textual technical description of a musical phenomenon (Which is definitely an important and integral part of the page). Ideally, it should prod the user to listen to atleast one of the songs, making it amply clear what a coda is. --Amrishkelkar 14:47, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't it be better to show a few selections of sheet music that show the ending coda symbol instead?  I mean, you're probably not gonna "hear" a coda when you listen to song.  Ace Frahm 15:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: Is it worth adding something about 'false' codas?  Regards, Ben Aveling 12:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  False coda 

message: Why, what, where, and how does this article need additional citations for verification? Hyacinth (talk) 08:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag removed. Hyacinth (talk) 02:01, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus that the music term is primary by either long-term significance or usage. Most of the supporters spent the RM stating in agreement that "it's the primary topic by long-term significance!" over and over again. Meanwhile, opponents have provided extensive data against primary status by usage, and also plausible competitors for long-term significance (phonological codas being brought up repeatedly). (non-admin closure) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 02:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Although this is provided for at WP:DABORDER (""), my edit has been reverted by someone who didn't like it. PamD 20:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

text: I would conclude there is no primary topic either by usage or long-term significance, and the disambiguation page should remain at the base name. Adumbrativus (talk) 11:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 March 2022