Talk:Kyle Chapman (New Zealand activist)

message: After having reviewed this article for a second time I've decided to flag it for POV. Obviously some bias has crept in especially regarding apparent harassment Kyle has received. Perhaps some sources would be good here. I would be happy to help rewrite the article. Bactoid (talk) 05:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article was "stubbed" last year due to a complaint, presumably from the subject. We shouldn't restore that information without good sources. That version had a couple of sources, but they may have gond dead. Proquest has about 50 articles that either mention him or are about him.  ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 07:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Survive Club is apparently a survivalist group. A type of club very common and well understood in the USA.  The statement that he that "denies being a militia and denies any racist ties despite the histories of some of its members" is simply biased.  There is no evidence cited that it is either a militia or racist.203.184.41.226 (talk) 19:34, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: A major editor of this page states that he is the subject, see . Dougweller (talk) 13:15, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 

message: I have twice removed the six-month old instances of the  and  templates from this article, pointing out that no specific issues have been identified, only to be reverted by User:Haminoon, with references to the section #Conflict of interest, which merely points out that a (minor) contributor to the article (most of whose edits have been modified or removed; and at least one of which removed a clear breach of WP:BLP) claims to be the subject.
The documentation for the latter template includes (links and emboldening in original):
and continues (emphasis added):
The use of the templates in this article does not meet the former criteria; and so they should be removed. This is a WP:BLP policy matter. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:18, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate tagging 

message: A recent edit stated in the infobox that Chapman's "Occupation" is "White supremacist". While he may be that, I don't think that is his occupation; it's not demonstrated that he earns a living by being a white supremacist. I have removed that claim. HenryCrun15 (talk) 22:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: One can validly state an occupation (e.g. "Student" or "Home duties" or "Retired") without earning a living from it. Maybe Mr Chapman can give us evidence. Robin Patterson (talk) 12:06, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Occupation: White supremacist"? 

message: I was just doing a quick edit on this one, to tie in with some Australian stuff, but it looks to me as if the parties in the table (specifically 2007) don't seem to match the content in the lead and body (National Front is given twice). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Tables not matching info in text?

message: The Taumarunui article lists him (without sources) as being born there in 1971.  The date fits OK with the Waikato  Times article of May 11 2009 (ref near the top) saying he was 38. Any better documentation? Birth certificate? Robin Patterson (talk) 11:58, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date and place