lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Archbishop

message: In "Archbishops of archdioceses" section, cardinal has no direct relationship with archbishop, as cardinal can be honoured virtually to all men with at least the order of the presbyterate (priest) by Pope [Cannon Law S.251]. So, I suggest to remove the description regarding cardinal in this section. ppa (talk) 22:37, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cardinal 

message: Would John Ireland(archbishop) be noteable enough to add to this list? If so,
what would be his archdiocese? --69.5.156.155 08:33, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Ireland 

message: Am I correct in thinking that the seat of an Archbishop is called an Archbishop's Palace?   See sentence top of Archbishop's Palace.--User:Brenont (talk) 00:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archbishop's Palace 

message: Any place to use the word bishopric in this Article? - redirects to diocese?--User:Brenont (talk) 00:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bishopric 

message: This article badly needs some!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dismalscholar (talk • contribs) 09:39, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Belly (band)

message: "The Tonight Show with David Letterman" referenced in paragraph two of the 'King' section has never existed. Unless Belly was performing in a parallel universe, this event could never have transpired. A more likely scenario would be that they either performed on "Late Show with David Letterman" or "The Tonight Show with Jay Leno". 76.114.148.80 (talk) 01:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual Error
Talk:Go ranks and ratings

message: The table currently gives the values 71.9%, 84.2%, 91.1% and the reference [8] is broken.
I get the values 58.0%, 64.0%, 68.0% from the reference http://pandanet-igs.com/communities/pandanet/60
and the following calculations (which you can enter in WolframAlpha):
* solve p*84 + (1-p)*(-116) = 0
* solve p*72 + (1-p)*(-128) = 0
* solve p*64 + (1-p)*(-136) = 0
I plan to fix the values and the reference in 1 week. Egnau (talk) 02:29, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winning probabilities for IGS 

message: I am confused about the EGF rating table in the article. It goes up to 7 dan amateur or 1 dan professional, and then suddenly jumps immediately to 8 dan professional. I.e from 2700 EGF rating to 2800 and above there is a huge leap in rank. Can someone confirm if this is correct ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.191.205.220 (talk) 23:21, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, there was a mistake. -Koppapa (talk) 10:49, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  EGF rating table 
Talk:100 Club

message: I've dropped in headings for the main eras in the history of the 100 Club, but havn't got time right now to fill these in, a useful source article for anyone who fancies having a go though is here quercus robur 10:47, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Looks like the venue's site has been updated which breaks the previous external links. I've updated them to the correct page names but the Flash menu they use doesn't really like deep links - it omits the navigation frames. Organhead 03:11, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: Sorry folks, forgot to fill in the edit summary.--Technopat 21:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  edit summary 

message: I go the the 100 club occasionally and was interested to read this Wikipedia article, but on the website for the Coda Club and in the events calendar for the 100 Club I could find no reference to the Coda Club still meeting there. If anyone confirms this I will be happy to do more research and bring the article up to date.Jiver2 (talk) 11:50, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the Coda Club still meet at the 100 CLub? 
Talk:Dukat (Star Trek)

message: There should be some for of disambiguation to allow for the "Dukat" spelling of Ducat. The Venetians may have spelled them "Ducat", but they weren't the only ones using this, the Germans used "Dukat" AFAICT. --Joy [shallot] 11:52, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm wondering if the similarity between the names Gul Dukat and gold ducat should be mentioned in the article, maybe in a "trivia" section. --Traal 17:42, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wasn't Gul Du Cat in a fair few Episodes of TNG ?--Irishpunktom\talk
:Marc Alaimo played a Cardassian in an episode of the Next Generation, but it wasn't Dukat - it was a character called Macet. --Erath 4 July 2005 17:29 (UTC)
Perhaps this article could stress the relative moral ambiguity of Dukat during certain times in the series. There were several times that (more of necessity than desire, on both sides of the aisle) Dukat and Sisko's crew worked together. The bottom line on Dukat should be that he was trecherous and generally untrustworthy, but prior to his pact with the Dominion, he WAS a viable ally in a lesser-of-two-evils sense.
not to mention comic relief when he sat on a sand-spike and had kira use a dermal regenerator on his butt! too bad nana visitor stomped all over the idea of a romance, although dukat did get at her mom...
-Lordraydens 18:14, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Errr

message: Can we mention somewhere that the Deep Space Nine relaunch novels establish Gul Macet (the first Cardassian to appear in Star Trek, also played by Alaimo) as Dukat's cousin? Just because it's such a cool idea. (Makes you wonder if the TNG Ferengi played by Shimerman and Grodénchik were all related to the brothers Quark...) Daibhid C 17:48, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I know it's not canonical but...

message: In a later episode, the Dukat character apologised for killing her saying that she "simply got in the way".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.82.157 (talk) 10:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jadzia 

message: Interview with Ira Behr discussing the character of Dukat, but it is a summary of an interview from Star Trek The Magazine, so if anyone has the original magazine article ideally it would be better to reference that directly. Point of interest: a different actor was cast as Dukat before Alaimo. Behr also emphasizes that Dukat was an utter villian. -- 109.78.197.28 (talk) 03:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Feng shui

message: I am not an adherent of feng shui, but I really have an issue with the repeated allegations that it is “pseudoscience.” In order to maintain proper neutrality and respect for the subject, these mentions should be minimized (especially given that I don’t see a specific allegation that would warrant the label), and it certainly doesn’t belong in the introductory/definition section. Spiritual practices are intrinsically separate from science, and thus they should not be put in a false dichotomy with science. 2600:6C65:623F:B019:8831:D8CE:F73B:FDC9 (talk) 03:15, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. And, putting it a different way, the meaning of pseudoscience includes a claim to be scientific.  Feng shui isn't.    North8000 (talk) 16:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is Christianity pseudoscience? They also claim well being. How scientific is that. Will you find "pseudoscience" in the Christianity article? Is the only difference that you consult a "Pappe", instead of a fortune teller? --Alien4 (talk) 17:09, 2 November 2022 (UTC)

text: A paper I am reading on right now seems to hold that Feng Shui has esoteric and exoteric functions. In other words, Feng Shui has had practical functions as a way to resolve conflict, assuage jealousy/envy, and organize rural development while also having a more superstitious and "pseudoscientific" function that developed in order to explain failures in land development and predictions in personal fortune. I think it would be a good idea to consider splitting up definitions of feng shui in this article in order to explain the folk religious aspects from the more "scientific" aspects of Feng Shui. That way we can get a more unbiased view of the practice. --RedHuron (talk) 01:08, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Pseudoscience” 

message: pungsu 풍수 風水 
Can someone do an article on it?
~~ED~~ 2607:FEA8:4A2:4100:21D2:54F6:19BC:D682 (talk) 11:40, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean version of Feng Shui
Template talk:Polish Underground State sidebar

message: See also: Template:Polish Secret State small. Halibutt 12:29, Sep 7, 2004 (UTC)
Errors: please see Talk:Polish_Secret_State#Not_totally_inclusive.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  21:52, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: COMMENTS
Talk:Rhosnesni High School

message: For an October 2004 deletion debate over this page see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Rhosnesni High School
----
i can also add that this mr knowles also treats these children in rhosnesni high like prisoners also get rid of him
:To be frank, most would rather you didn't, thanks. Chris 01:57, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Due to the AfD above, and the fact this article covers more than just Rhosnesni High School, should we move it to Wrexham High Schools instead? 172.214.212.35 09:32, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever is done, it should be edited so it doesn't talk about 2004 events as if they are going to occur in the future ("...until it moves later in 2004..."). - DavidWBrooks 13:17, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Move?
Talk:JXTA

message: I would like to expand this page by adding and describing all
protocol items of jxta
"The most mature P2P framework available" ... yet no application in common use makes use of it. Hmm.
85.112.147.118 16:37, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:CHOI-FM

message: Is this station still on the air, or is it off the air? I know its license has been basically cancelled and operates as a pirate radio station last time i checked...  RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 21:30, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The station is still on air, as the license was deemed valid again when Radio-Nord acquired it.  You should not confuse CHOI-FM and the new program Jeff Fillion is hosting on internet radio, called "radio-pirate". Boréal 20:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  On or off? 
Talk:Fire hose

message: This high pressure has also allowed the fire hose to serve as an instrument of crowd control
Am I alone in not liking this?  The hose has little to do with the high pressure.  You can just as easily (actually more easily) put low pressure water through a fire hose. anthony (see warning) 14:10, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You are not alone. In addition, I think the example given - "most notably by Bull Connor in the Deep South of the United States against civil rights protestors" - is probably not the "most notable" example - water cannons are used routinely by many law enforcement bodies. Bobstay 11:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Crowd control

message: So I'm wondering why the firehoses I see are "flat". The cross section looks like this (please excuse the cruddy ascii art):
  _______
 |_______|
What is the reason for this? Do they still look like this after they have been deployed and are in use? 
--greenmoss 13:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They're flat so they take up less space when rolled up. When deployed the water inflates them so they're round. Google images for "firehose" will give you plenty of examples. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobstay (talk • contribs) 11:31, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. More specifically though, they're flat so they -fold- better. While booster lines (hard rubber) are stored on reels, woven-jacket fire hose (1 3/4 and up) is folded up in a hose bed on the top of the engine. As it comes out of the bed it can be broken down into shorter lengths (such as 50' and 100') as needed, hooked to the pump, and charged. Once charged, the woven jacket hose (which has a rubber lining inside) becomes round...and often rather heavy :P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.82.9.55 (talk) 00:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Flatness

message: sorry for the horrid  " -fact can be found here-> " addition, but i'm at work right now and don't know how to cite on the wiki. If anyone could edit it into a proper citation i'd be much oblidged. --Paddy Fitzgerald 15:06, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: Got the pressure in the hose, great.  How about some typical flow rates used when fighting fires?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.189.64.96 (talk) 02:11, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flowrate 

message: "It was invented by Hero of Alexandria" "The first fire hose was invented by Jan van der Heyden in 1672." Despite the cite on van der Heyeden, these can't both be right....  TREKphiler hit me ♠  10:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Listen, hoser...

message: The article uses both spellings, fire hose and firehose, but fire hose is more common in this article. However, firehose instability uses the single-word spelling exclusively. Furthermore, most academic writing on the firehose instability chooses the single-word spelling. Which spelling would you prefer for each case? Whatever the spelling, this article should pick one and stick with it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PSimeon (talk • contribs) 17:35, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling: fire hose or firehose
Talk:Pentagon (computer)

message: IIRC, Pentagon itself was just a 128 clone, running at the usual speed. However, the Scorpion model, based on Pentagon, was able to run at higher speed. My memories are vague here, I thought it was twice the original (7 MHz not 5), but I only got it as rumours from my friends who have seen it working, not from an actual benchmark result and never from somebody who knew the insides. See This page (in English!) for  a supporting claim. I will try e-mailing my old friends (from the Hobbit (computer) glorious gang) and see what they remember.
That would be great if you could get this detail resolved, thanks :)
MasterDirk 09:33, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Pentagon (original 1989 square motherboard) was a 48 clone, with no WAITs. It has not any turbo mode. I have two Pentagon 48 motherboards, 2 Pentagon 128 (Pentagon +) computers (working, but unstable), and one Pentagon 1024SL v2.1 (working, stable). Alone Coder 20:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pentagon's higher speed mode 

message: The Pentagon 2 mobo clearly shows a copyright date of 2006, along with many chips almost certainly unavailable in the СССР (e.g. the Altera FPGA.) I think it's somewhat misleading to refer in the main text to the reengineered Pentagons as 'the latest versions' when they're much more of a retrocomputing effort AFAICT. --moof 20:25, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pentagon 2 never existed. There was Pentagon 2+ (1991). The model you pointing at (with FPGA) is Pentagon 1024SL v2.x, developed by Alexey Zhabin (King of Evil) in 2006. It is still in production. Previous Pentagons had not FPGAs, not counting small ULA in Pentagon 3+ (1993, Solon). Alone Coder 20:22, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Pentagon 1024SL v2.x continues general Pentagon line, including ideas of devices suggested by numerous people in 1996-2005 (1M memory, Mr Gluk Reset Service, video modes), these devices were originally soldered to Pentagon + motherboard). Alone Coder 20:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pentagon 2
Talk:Orsha

message: Anybody know, what is the source of location information i.e. 54°28′14″ N 30°19′05″ E ? It is easy to check following the link from this location and using any tools from the link, that  54°28′14″ N 30°19′05″ E is a little bit outside Orsha. --Begemotv2718 01:46, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: Final tally was 12–4 in favor of the move (75%). howcheng  {chat} 23:29, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved to Orsha
Category talk:World War II destroyers of the United States

message: Many Wickes-class destroyers never saw service in World War II. If we must categorize by era, then this class belongs in World War I, when most of the ships served. Although, in my mind, this example is a good reason not to lump entire classes of vessels into eras.
Jinian 15:20, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: If that's the case then I quite agree, a subcategory shouldn't be a subcategory when there are exceptions within it. If all members of a class did participate in WWII without exception, though, I think it's not unreasonable to subcategorize it here - if only to reduce the category clutter on the pages themselves. (note that I don't know much about naval history myself, I was just running with what previous Wikipedia editors had done before.) Bryan 15:27, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: This class may be among the more complex. All ships served in WWI. Some served in WWII, but after being converted to minelayers. Others were transfered to the British and saw WWII under that flag. I'll bump the class up to a sub-class under US Destroyers, or move it to a WWI sub class. Some of the ships will be categorized as WWII era destroyers, others as other types of ships in WWII. Jinian 15:49, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Wickes class
Talk:Chandler wobble

message: Several sources on the Internet as well as a major Swedish encyclopedia (NE) states that Euler predicted the nutation to have a period of 305 days. Which figure is the correct one?
Mårten Berglund (talk) 22:30, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euler nutation period 305 or 355 days? 

message: Why 'The science fictional property'? 80.0.109.29 (talk) 15:28, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Fictional'? 

message: IMHO, "pole tide" deserves a page, and the Earth Tide page deserves a link - or are they the same? 94.30.84.71 (talk) 10:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pole Tide 

message: Shouldn't this article be merged with Polar motion#Chandler Wobble?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orionbelt en (talk • contribs) 19:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Polar motion

message: The article says that the Chandler wobble of the Earth would die out in about 68 years, but is driven by energy contributed by ocean currents and such.  A later section states that Mars has a Chandler wobble.  Yet it has no ocean to keep the wobble going.  Is there a sourced explanation for this discrepancy? Gnuish (talk) 18:53, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earth's wobble would damp out -- so why does Mars's wobble not damp out?
Talk:Biological interaction

message: Is there a term for when two organisms interact and both are harmed? Or does that not exsist...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.9.58.67 (talk) 07:34, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

message: Why was this article restored? I thought the consensus was to merge with symbiosis? Andrew Z. Colvin • Talk 18:37, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restored? 

message: Not mentioned or explained in article. Equinox ◑ 04:35, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "synnecrosis" redirect here?
Talk:Rasayana

message: I tried to clean this up a bit, but i also got rid of some stuff which doesn't seem to fit into this article. Please look at it, and see if it should be put back in, or added somewhere else Illuvatar 17:29, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page Rasavātam redirects to this page, but the term 'Rasavātam' doesn't appear here. How is it related. Can it be added in the text? Wiki-uk (talk) 07:53, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rasavātam 

message: Is there a difference?
~~Ed~~ 2607:FEA8:4A2:4100:F007:4418:10B8:F668 (talk) 08:34, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there is a huge difference. Rasāyana is rejuvenation therapies that can be traced to early Ayurveda while Rasaśāstra is the practice of alchemy. Kayakalpa is more similar to rasāyana than rasashastra, though it is mentioned only in passing in ayurvedic texts, belonging to the Tamil siddha system of medicine instead. This article need a LOT of work and is completely unreliable. 123.203.19.204 (talk) 07:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rasayana/Rasashastra vs Kayakalpa
Talk:Politics of Sweden

message: Would it be possible to say something about offentlighetsprincipen?
Filur 17:59, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: And where in the article should "Piratpartiet" be mentioned? Itake 13:06, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I think it would be nice to have a section on feminism and the various parities position in relation to feminism. I think all the (major) parties except the Christian Democrats (and perhaps the Moderates ... not sure) support gender equality and feminism. Sweden has a very high number of women in parliament (close to 50%) compared to other countries.  Anyway, what do people think?  If people support the idea I will start it...~AFA ʢűčķ¿Ю 14:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The moderates? They of course claim that men and women are equal, but does nothing for it. In Sweden it has become coquettish among the established parties to call themselves "feminists" - only the Christian Democrats have resisted. I have a strong feeling that this is an uncovered check in most cases, but it depends on how feminism really shall be defined. The Social Democrats have done a great deal practically, for improving the conditions for women, historically, but it seems there was a backlash during the 80:ies and 90:ies. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 18:44, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feminism and the parties position (and the 'state') 

message: Article says:
:Popular government in Sweden rests upon ancient traditions. The Swedish Riksdag stems from the ancient court system used by all Germanic peoples, the Ting, and the election of kings in the Viking age. The Government of Sweden has adhered to Parliamentarism — de jure since 1975, de facto since 1917.
What rubbish is that? We don't elect Kings by Tings today, and kings where chosen for life (which used to be pretty short after being chosen king). There's nothing unusual with Swedens way to democracy, except possibly that it was a slow peaceful process. In the early 1800ths we had Charles XIV John, an authoritarian king of bourgeoisi background, who worked intensely and charismatically to make Sweden a peacefully trading land with stable economy. His sons were successively detached from power, and in the same process democratic freedoms increased, the Swedish Riksdag of the Estates reluctantly, with much debate, replaced itself with the Riksdag, and more and more democratic rights were added till 1921, the womens suffrage was added, and Sweden can be considered fully democratic. Not older than that! Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 18:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Said, that is ... I changed it, of course, to fulfill a less ethnocentric, more modest and NPOV tone. Being a swede, I cannot stand Swedes boast around with some mysticist explanations on why Swedes are so üeberphantastique. I know they aren't. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 09:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bubkes
Talk:Norwegian campaign order of battle

message: Could somebody please correct (or clarify, if there's a reason) the following, from the Royal Navy section, as the numbers given don't match the number of ships named:
*3 Battleships - Resolution, Rodney, Valiant, and Warspite. 
*1 Battlecruiser - Renown and Repulse. 
*5 Light Cruisers - Arethusa, Aurora, Coventry, Curlew, Enterprise, Galatea, and Penelope.
The article gives the impression that the Norwegian infantry regiments were intended to operate as tactical units. This was in fact not the case. In wartime the regiments were supposed to mobilize their battalions which would be formed into brigades four a piece. If higher level units became necessary the brigades would be formed into avsnitt and grupper - "sections" and "groups". In the end the mobilization in Southern Norway was so disrupted that only 4th Brigade was the only brigade established more or less in line with regulations, elsewhere units were gathered into improvised "groups" composed of whatever formations were at hand.   Fornadan (t) 21:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled