lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Timur Kulibayev

message: This Article has been vandlized systematically since 27. May 2010 by a user with several user accounts (User:KXFT934, User:Azamatumbetov, User:Abdullin ilyas and probably more). The user removes all content concerning "Accusations of money laundering" and other critics. A lot of content is probably lost and should be restored from the history. Some of these user accounts exist in the German Wikipedia too and they are used for vandalism. For references see the history in de. --Nowic (talk) 23:25, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Artem Legin is another of his accounts. --Nowic (talk) 19:23, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: User:178.89.107.30 might be his IP-adres, as this anonymous is very active with deleting this section as well. Dqfn13 (talk) 13:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 
Talk:Missouri Constitutional Convention of 1861–1863

message: The following is unintentionally misleading:
"Confederates from the original convention were to hold their own meeting at declare the state had joined the Confederate States of America."
The rump legislature did not hold a convention, but instead approved secession on its own. Red Harvest (talk) 13:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Secession
Talk:G-Eclipse

message: I would change the 2nd paragraph by removing the last phrase 
  "g-Eclipse provides functionality for Grid job deployment, ..."
and adding a separate paragraph with a somewhat longer explanation of:
* supported middlewares
* features
* one or two of screenshots! (user perspective + one with nice visualization?)
Another item: we mention that we are an "Eclipse Foundation project" but there is nowhere a link to our eclipse.org webpage.
 
--Aog2000a (talk) 14:19, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial Article Authoring Discussion
Talk:The Lazy Man's Guide to Enlightenment

message: This article does not need copy editing until it has been referenced.  Editing copy that might be deleted, altered or ignored in perpetuity is a pointless exercise.  Hence, I have replaced the copy editing template on the article page with the unrefrenced template, and I have placed the GOCE template at the top of this page.  Regards Peter S Strempel | Talk  12:44, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we also cant let such unsourced information stand forever. however, i have edited it based on 2 refererences: the introduction of the 1995 edition, and the publication history from the 1995 edition. all the other information is essentially original research without sources, so was removed.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit notes
Talk:Partyflock

message: This website is non notable. It provides no out of universe material nor does it provide a third party source. Undeath (talk) 14:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Non Notable

message: I've deleted the speedy tag.  Partyflock is a notable phenomenon in the Netherlands, covered in the press.  See De Telegraaf, February 22, 2007, 
"Dancescene verzamelt zich op Partyflock," LexisNexis.  Here's excerpts from the google translation:
"The largest of its kind Partyflock.nl, where millions of daily partyfreaks to tune in membership still continues to grow. Partyflock coming weekend celebrates its five-year existence in Gelredome stadium, a single trip from the virtual to the real world. / "We are a central meetingpoint of dancescene become," says Karian, Gulick, who along with her brother Thomas started the site. Partyflock, started in a student at the University of Twente server, was in 2005 a company official. "Even abroad were people paragraph," says Van Gulick. "At this moment we are at 260,000 active members, and we have about ten million page views per day. The power has to do especially in our extensive agenda, only that we get all 700 mails per day. Fortunately we work with seventy volunteers , but it still takes work. " 
Interesting figures; on Partyflock you see at a glance what is popular celebration, when many members it is for their personal agenda. "There are also meetings at festivals, which the members agree. Together with the comments that everyone leaves, makes for a very lively dancegemeenschap." 
Next Saturday is also a 'flockersmeeting', but one where 20,000 troops coming. More will not follow. Van Gulick: "We want an independent meetingpoint. If we organize more celebrations go, we actually competitor of the organisations on our site can be found. Therefore, this is a one-time birthday party, the Internet remains our home."Wageless (talk) 14:56, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep
Talk:Robin's Nest (TV series)

message: I saw a classic episode of Robin's Nest today and the credits at the end of programme said Thames ©1983 so I'm wondering now if this article is correct on saying that it ended in 1981? Surely it ended in 1983?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Onshore (talk • contribs) 16:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robin's Nest ran till...
Talk:Junk Bay

message: It says Tseung Kwan (將軍) means "soldier", surely 將軍 is a high ranked officer? Hzh (talk) 23:49, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soldier? 
Talk:Candy apple red

message: Isn't this colour more commonly known as "candy apple red"? I propose a move to that name. If that's done, the redirect of "candy apple red" to Joe Bailon will have to be fixed. --ukexpat (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that makes much more sense. We could call it "Candy apple red (color)." --~~MusicalConnoisseur~~  Got Classical? 02:02, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This color is more commonly referred to as  candy-apple red. I agree with the move but will have to reread the section on moving an article before I comment/act further. --Busyreading (talk) 22:43, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done the move and fix the "candy apple red" redirect as it should link here --Chris 10:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Move 

message: In the above applications, "Candy Apple Red" (and by extension other colors, e.g. green) refers not to a particular shade but to a unique finish produced by covering a metallic gold undercoat with layers of tinted translucent lacquer. This usage should be mentioned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.78.37.124 (talk) 01:01, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guitar/custom car finish 

message: I am a little worried that this article is based on the use of the term in modern culture rather than historic use. Many site the "caramelized" version of this color is a product of modern paint technologies, processes, and finishes which promoted its use on custom muscle cars in the 1970's but also other products during that time. Actual automotive OEM use of this color name has been primarily a non-metallic or non-caramelized version. So the first sentence of this article and the photos shown promote this possible non-standard, and definitely non-historical use of the color name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.46.159.54 (talk) 16:13, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historic use of the "caramelized" version of Candy Apple Red color 

message: :Candy apple red (color) →  – Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Ssjhowarthisawesome (talk) 19:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: *Done. Dekimasuよ! 20:15, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 March 2018 

message: An entry in List of colors: A–F contained a link to this page.
The entry is :
* Dark candy apple red
An entry in List of colors: G–M contained a link to this page.
The entry is :
* Medium candy apple red
I don't see any evidence that this color is discussed in this article and plan to delete it from the list per this discussion: Talk:List_of_colors#New_approach_to_review_of_entries
If someone decides that this color should have a section in this article and it is added, I would appreciate a ping.--S Philbrick(Talk) 00:04, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible removal from list
Template talk:St. Louis Metro Area High Schools

message: Is there an ordering to the school names?  (i.e. not alphabetic?)  Zanter (talk) 14:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

message: So I realized that three schools in the region are in the Diocese of Belleville (Althoff, Gibault, and Mater Dei), while another bunch are in the Archdiocese of St. Louis. The schools that are in Belleville aren't technically Archdiocesan, but neither are they private.  Do we really want or need another section? My impulse is to combine all the Catholic schools into one section in the template (private, Archdiocesan, Diocesan), but consensus on that is necessary. Thoughts? poroubalous (talk) 22:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archdiocesan versus diocesan
Talk:Musical glasses

message: First of all because it was not patent nonsense.  In fact, the text was pretty much lifted from Glass harp.
Second because, as User:Dlohcierekim observed, this looks like it could be a justifiable redirect.  (I think it is.)
Even if you disagree, please take the long road — I don't think speedy is justified. — the Sidhekin (talk) 14:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I find multiple mentions of this term in this context on the web. Looks legit to me.   Dlohcierekim Deleted? 14:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy?  I don't think so.
Talk:Learning standards

message: Thinking about how to reorganize the Learning Standards page to better capture the rich political and philosophical history thereof. My own understanding and background is with US standards; it would be a pleasure to gain additional reorg assistance from someone with expertise in European or other international standards sets to create a more cohesive POV. Reorg might be:  Philosophical Underpinnings, History , Approaches to defining/creating, Examples . 
Daveplml (talk) 14:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

message: I restored a change that was made last year, by an IP address, that reduced the scope of a learning standard to only what the learner  knows rather than what they can do which is clearly also something that some learning standards cover.    I also held back from talking about "learning DATA standards" which includes controlled vocabulary for learning oriented data elements.   This focuses on standards for  measuring student Knowledge, Skills, Aptitudes or Attitudes (which has recently become more standard as Socio-Emotional Learning becomes more prevalent). Alex Jackl (talk) 17:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of Learning Standards
Talk:Shrewsbury and Hereford Railway

message: Should Leebotwood station not be shown between Dorrington and Church Stretton?  Rojomoke (talk) 10:53, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: true, so have added. --Redrose64 (talk) 14:59, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leebotwood 

message: Assuming halts are meant to be shown on these maps, I've added All Stretton between Leebotwood and Church Stretton.  Rojomoke (talk) 01:15, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, any passenger station on the line, no matter how small or short-lived (this one was 1936-43 and 1946-58) should be shown. I've gone through a 1955 rail atlas and added several others. The position of  relative to the Bishops Castle Railway is provisional. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:57, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  All Stretton 

message: The link to Dinmore railway station on the map goes to a station in Australia, not the closed station in Herefordshire. I cant see how to change this without messing up the map (and possibly other pages), so I'll leave it for someone better qualified to correct. Markb (talk) 13:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that. I've . --Redrose64 (talk) 13:51, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken/incorrect link
Talk:Southern Michigan Railroad Society

message: per this link the museum appears to be operating in 2009. WuhWuzDat 15:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that the organizations website has not been updated is not indicative of a lack of operations. Assuming so would fall under the category of Original Research. WuhWuzDat 15:06, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  operations in 2009 

message: POV check requested, and article tagged for COI, due to main author of article, user:Harpwolf, being a member of this organization. WuhWuzDat 21:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV-check requested 

message: See new look at www.southernmichiganrailroad.com and watch for integration of new web services as the site continues to be overhauled.  Under development include an online reservation system, improved and redesigned brochures, and more pictures and information about equipment.
SMRSWebDesign (talk) 22:09, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Southern Michigan Railroad Society website under renovation October 2009.
Talk:Boreal Plains Ecozone (CEC)

message: Bibliography:
Amiro, B. D., Todd, J. B., Wotton, B. M., Logan, K. A., Flannigan, M. D., Stocks, B. J., ... & Hirsch, K. G. (2001). Direct carbon emissions from Canadian forest fires, 1959-1999. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31(3), 512-525.
Balshi, M. S., Mcguire, A. D, Duffyz, P., Kicklighter, D. W. (2014). Vulnerability of Carbon Storage in North American Boreal Forests to Wildfires During the 21st Century.
Benscoter, B. W., Thompson, D. K., Waddington, J. M., Flannigan, M. D., Wotton, B. M., De Groot, W. J., & Turetsky, M. R. (2011). Interactive effects of vegetation, soil moisture and bulk density on depth of burning of thick organic soils. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 20(3), 418-429.
Hokanson, K. J., Lukenbach, M. C., Devito, K. J., Kettridge, N., Petrone, R. M., & Waddington, J. M. (2016). Groundwater connectivity controls peat burn severity in the boreal plains. Ecohydrology, 9(4), 574-584.
Olefeldt, D., Devito, K. J., & Turetsky, M. R. (2013). Sources and fate of terrestrial dissolved organic carbon in lakes of a Boreal Plains region recently affected by wildfire. Biogeosciences Discussions, 10(4), 6093-6141.
Vitt, D. H., Halsey, L. A., Bauer, I. E., & Campbell, C. (2000). Spatial and temporal trends in carbon storage of peatlands of continental western Canada through the Holocene. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 37(5), 683-693.
Zoltai, S. C., Morrissey, L. A., Livingston, G. P., & Groot, W. D. (1998). Effects of fires on carbon cycling in North American boreal peatlands. Environmental Reviews, 6(1), 13-24.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by McmasterUniversity3B03 (talk • contribs) 22:18, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ecozones of Canada

message: Please see comments at Talk:List_of_ecoregions_in_the_United_States_(EPA) and also in corresponding section on User talk:Mindmatrix.Skookum1 (talk) 03:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Correlation with US EPA Level I ecoregions

message: There should be an article and a link here to the Environment Canada Ecoregions since the Ecozones are further subdivided into ecoregions by the government of Canada: 
http://www.ec.gc.ca/soer-ree/English/Framework/Nardesc/canada_e.cfm
142.36.45.81 (talk) 20:35, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ecoregions of Canada
Talk:CITV (TV channel)

message: I thought I would just mention that my freeview box here in North Wales has automatically moved the CITV Channel from Channel 75 to Channel 802. (05/02/2008, 15:16 GMT) Onshore
:CITV still channel 75, although it has moved to a different Freeview space so that ITV4 can go 24h. Oh and WP:NOT#FORUM. --AxG @ ►talk 16:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

message: GMTV still operate the CITV Channel between 6.00am and 9.25am by simulcasting GMTV2. It therefore is not entirely owned by ITV plc, and where is the citation to prove GMTV sold/no longer sells advertising on the channel? /Marbles (talk) 12:57, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GMTV in CITV Channel 

message: Should we mention the Horrid Henry CITV takeover that is taking place between the 15th February and the 19th February, thought I'd mention it here. Paul2387 17:04, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Added section on the Purple Hang Gang takeover, could someone take a look at it and rephrase and change/add bits as necessary. Thanks Paul2387 13:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horrid Henry Takover 
Talk:S-310

message: Compare to the JAXA page. Is this a WP:COPYVIO? (sdsds - talk) 15:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighted material? 

message: How many starts has this little japs missle made until now?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.229.236.173 (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starts
Talk:Cley Windmill

message: Looks like theres major typos with the foundation dates; I reckon it should read 1819 founded, but someone check this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.229.34 (talk) 17:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The mill was first mentioned in 1819, but it can't be stated for certain that it was built in that year. Mjroots (talk) 08:00, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates
Talk:Regular grid

message: Is the first picture of curvilinear grid correct? The Lines are curved and not straigtht. Shouldn't they be straight in such a grid? Roadexpert (talk) 15:21, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The lines just look curved based on the fact that when combined, they make an overall curved line.  But individually(the lines between vertices), they definitely are straight.CFDFEM (talk) 19:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

message: There are 3 types of "regular grids", so, the other 2 must be showed in the article. See Euclidean_tilings_by_convex_regular_polygons#Regular_tilings. Krauss (talk) 12:18, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong assertion
Talk:Triad Securities

message: Triad is the only company that reports on IPO meta analysis besides Rennaisance.   And they are the only company of it's kind that also provides clearing and services institutions.   It's *very* interesting to me that the WSJ quotes them - but I can never find anything out about them.  Why are they quoted in Barrons/WSJ?   Why not talk to Goldman Sachs or one of the other major institutional players?
Who are they?  I was hoping other contributors would help me resolve the mystery.  I cobbled together a bunch of referenced the first time the article was created, but it was deleted so fast, i didn't have time to discuss it at all.  
Refs:
* 9 Deals may Price
* Deal Strain on Refco News
* Quoted alongside Morgan Stanley
* WSJ May 2009 
*  Barrons Nov 2009 71.111.198.84 (talk) 16:19, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Try putting a request in at Wikipedia:Requests for expansion.  Also, put links to this article in appropriate places in other Wiki articles - that will get it some attention. ♣♦ SmartGuy ♥♠ 16:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  According to a friend who works for a small fund:  investment banks are biased on IPO reporting.   Triad is not an investment bank, so they are not, which is why journalists favor them.  Simultaneous (talk) 21:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Digital holography

message: Some of the article suggests that digital holgraphy refers to digital analysis of holograms, but other parts say that it refers to the generation of holgrams using computers, and is the same as computer generatedI find this whole page very confusing.  
The abstract from the book 'Digital Holography' which is the first refernce given suggests the latter:
"This book presents a self-contained treatment of the principles and major applications of digital hologram recording and numerical reconstruction (Digital Holography). The first part deals with optical foundations and the theory of holography. The next section describes how to record holograms directly with an electronic sensor (CCD) and describes the various reconstruction techniques. A special chapter is designated to digital holographic interferometry with applications in deformation and shape measurement and refractive index determination. Applications in imaging and microscopy are also described. The next part discusses special techniques such as digital light-in-flight holography, holographic endoscopy, information encrypting and comparative holography. In the last chapter related techniques of speckle metrology are treated briefly." 
This needs to be clarified by an expert.Epzcaw (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion about the meaning of 'Digital Holography' 

message: The 'convention' now seems to be: computer-generated holograms (CGH) refers to the process of numerically calculating and printing the hologram followed by optical reconstruction by shining laser on it. On the other hand, digital holography (DH) refers to the opposite process where the hologram is generated optically by shining laser on an object and the hologram is recorded electronically using a ccd camera. The reconstruction is done numerically inside a computer. In both the CGH and DH, the numerical calculation of the hologram is carried out using the basic theory of propagation of electromagnetic wave, which includes light. Bbokki (talk) 04:25, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ================================
Talk:Severn and Wye Railway

message: In the Mineral Loop section it says the new line ran from Tufts Junction to Drybrook Road. Should that read Tufts Junction to Serridge? Obscurasky (talk) 22:39, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because the junction was five chains west of Drybrook Road station, but 74 chains east of Serridge Junction. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite happy to bow to your superior knowledge on this, it's just that I read somewhere that before the mineral Loop was constructed the 'steam terminus' was at Serridge. That was incorrect then? Obscurasky (talk) 16:39, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made some edits to the section, in an attempt to clarify the Mineral Loop's route. I'd be grateful if you could check it for accuracy. Thank you. Obscurasky (talk) 00:03, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mineral Loop
Talk:Caffrey's Irish Ale

message: The page sounded like an advert, its better now but still needs citations.
I found:
http://www.beerhunter.com/documents/19133-000742.html
but the details need to be confirmed by a reliable source.
I'm just a Canadian citizen, and I have to say that the stuff about the nitrogen and the smoothness is true from original research (AKA drinking) but since that's not academic, I didn't add that to the article.   As far as the last bit about encouraging US consumers to contact Coors, I agree, but that doesn't belong in the article.
Paul haynes (talk) 15:39, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite a bit of time has passed, and the article does not now read like a blatant advert. It could certainly use some more refs (eg for sales figures) so I have changed the template accordingly. Halsteadk (talk) 22:13, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation

message: Note : The Standards were revised in 2011: [url]http://www.eval.org/evaluationdocuments/progeval.html[/url]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.213.192.126 (talk) 18:03, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Incidental motion

message: The article says "Their relationship to subsidiary and privileged motions depends upon the circumstances, but generally, by their nature they must be acted upon immediately in order to have the intended effect." Is this true? An incidental motion can be raised and then a bunch of privileged and other incidental motions can be raised, without impeding the purpose of the original incidental motion. I think I'll remove that statement. Sarsaparilla (talk) 15:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

message: I plan to merge this article into Motion (parliamentary procedure). Ronruser (talk) 19:49, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Ronruser (talk) 01:43, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Motion (parliamentary procedure)