Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Skipsievert

message: This user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Luxaquitaine
User talk:Luxaquitaine who has signed on to this request is a member of NET (Enrique Lescure their treasurer is the name of User:Luxaquitaine). Network of European Technocrats I consider what he and the other NET users here are doing.. Isenhand/Andrew Wallace who is the NET Director... and Ross Murphy or Hibernian also a registered NET user.. to be harassment. 
Yes Luxaquitaine's name is Enrique Lescure and he is the Director of Finance for NET. That is a conflict of interest as an editor here on the NET website article. Also he is part of a team assembled by Isenhand/Dr. Andrew Wallace to control and in my opinion censor the article Network of European Technocrats I can demonstrate that. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest
Wikipedia:Conflict of interest - Wikipedia
This is a thread with Enrique Lescure in it on NET 
http://en.technocracynet.eu/index.php?option=com_fireboard&Itemid=63&func=view&catid=10&id=5961#5989
NET Re:ideas for the prototechnate to make capital. - N.E.T. Forum
And another. 
http://en.technocracynet.eu/index.php?option=com_fireboard&Itemid=63&func=view&id=4203&catid=20&limit=15&limitstart=0
Network of European Technocrats - Re:Information for payment - N.E.T.
The gist of this situation is this.
::A Team of people from a website Network of European Technocrats created an article on wikipedia. Now they want to control the article. So far the members that signed on to this Request are all registered members/users of NET. Ross Murphy/Hibernian...http://en.technocracynet.eu/index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=85&Itemid=65
Network of European Technocrats - Ross Murphy/forum user of NET
Andrew Wallace/Isenhand...Director of NET. User:Luxaquitaine NET treasurer/Enrique Lescure. 
Now this is a group of people organized by Andrew Wallace to control information on the article mentioned. No doubt they can draw from their membership and find any number of people on their blog/forum to come to the Request and sign it for them. http://en.technocracynet.eu/index.php?option=com_fireboard&Itemid=63&func=view&catid=7&id=853#1399
Network of European Technocrats - Re:"War" on Wikipedia over Technocracy I - N.E.T. Forum
Their own website details a plan to control the information. Forming a group to control the information. As said they are the self published writers that have put up the information and the site is a money making site. http://en.technocracynet.eu/index.php?option=com_fireboard&Itemid=63&func=view&catid=10&id=5961#5989
NET Re:ideas for the prototechnate to make capital. - N.E.T. Forum
another example  http://en.technocracynet.eu/index.php?option=com_fireboard&Itemid=63&func=view&id=4203&catid=20&limit=15&limitstart=0
Network of European Technocrats - Re:Information for payment - N.E.T.
another example  http://en.technocracynet.eu/index.php?option=com_fireboard&Itemid=63&func=view&catid=7&id=853#1399
Network of European Technocrats - Re:"War" on Wikipedia over Technocracy I - N.E.T. Forum
All this means to me that a group of people now trying to play act with a fake consensus are trying to control the content of 6 or 7 articles in an effort to make money by directing traffic to their forum/blog. That falls under advertising which is something that is prohibited on wikipedia. skip sievert (talk) 00:39, 11 February 2008 (UTC)