lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:KSVK 12.7

message: WE NEED PICTURES!!!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.81.226.247 (talk) 22:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pics please

message: To remove copyrighted text from http://world.guns.ru/sniper/sn50-e.htm, the article was reverted to its state in March 2007, to the last version prior to the addition of that cut-and-pasted text. I restored the categories and interwiki links added in the interim, and the article is a stub.
Please do not add copyrighted text from other websites into Wikipedia. If the text is added again, please let me know and/or report it at WP:CP. Thanks. KrakatoaKatie 22:11, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: I'm thinking the Pop Culture section should be removed per Wikipedia:GUNS#Pop_culture, but wanted to open it up for discussion before doing so.  Thoughts? Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 00:03, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and dumped it. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 01:53, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop culture section. 

message: https://twitter.com/pfc_joker/status/538015434893967360/photo/1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.132.122.57 (talk) 17:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seen in Syria,used by syrian army special forces  

message: Both spellings are used.  If the context is this article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Materiel
then the one with the e at the end is the right one.
2404:4404:2729:E200:5927:1DCA:1A32:241 (talk) 08:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  anti-materiel or anti-material
Talk:Berthier rifle

message: Page copied from Lebel_Model_1886_rifle and Lebel_rifle? Zlllll (talk) 22:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Request received to merge articles: Berthier carbine and Mannlicher Berthier into Berthier rifle; dated November 2015.  Discuss here. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 02:36, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Reviving this. I'm in the process of combining the two articles into one. It would be much appreciated if the "Berthier carbine" page could be deleted as it is redundant. (Burmiester (talk) 00:51, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Discussion

message: — Assignment last updated by Nicole0018 (talk) 18:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Editing Process
Talk:Longbow T-76

message: Looks like Dakota Arms doesn't make the Longbow anymore, and it's no longer on their page. The links go to a 404 redirect to the homepage, and I went through the whole thing and they don't mention it anywhere I could find, so I removed the references section rather than leave it blank. --StarChaser Tyger (talk) 11:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longbow doesn't live here anymore.
Talk:M167 VADS

message: AFAIK the M167 is used by the SK armed forces in limited capacity for urban AA. It's a well known fact that many high-rise buildings in Korea have an AA site on the top floor, and most if not all of them have M167s. There are numerous official pictures from the Ministry of Defense, as well as a lot of first hand accounts. Not sure if SK still belongs in the "Former Operators" section -71.204.108.229 (talk) 19:26, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  M167 usage by SK 

message: The wikipedia article should include the effective range, even if only as an estimate / guesstimate. Many viewers don't know that. For example, I don't. I came to wikipedia because I wanted to find out. (This should go to all anti-air articles, a table on the effective range, even if only a guess. Right now I don't know if the range is 5 meters or 5000 meters or anything in between...). 2A02:8388:1604:F600:6D3E:54F:D1:F386 (talk) 19:45, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Just added range figures from relevant army field manual. I suspect there's more depth to be had here from different ammunition types and possibly variations on the gun (PIVADS had a longer range than VADS, but I'm not sure about the exact numbers). AN.FSQ-7 (talk) 04:04, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effective range
Talk:Chun Mee

message: This paragraph needs some slight clarification - diffusion is hindered in comparison to what? Jackiespeel (talk) 10:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Caffeine diffusion
Talk:Shui Jin Gui tea

message: It appears that an earlier version of this article, as well as the Shui Jin Gui tea article, were plagiarized by the 2010 book Cha Dao: The Way of Tea, Tea as a Way of Life. Since the history of this page shows that its content was added several years before the publication of the book, I'm guessing the author of the book copied the content from this page. --diff (talk) 00:04, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmmmm
Talk:Baimudan tea

message: White Peony is a common name used for the tea in English speaking markets. I propose that the English name add to the title of the article. Also spelling for the romanization of the characters 白牡丹 should follow the pinyin convention as Bai Mudan, i.e, in two words rather than three.  
Bill Ukers (talk) 14:04, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bai Mudan=White Peony
Talk:Bai Jiguan tea

message: Was the rooster protecting his chick ('his child')? Jackiespeel (talk) 10:22, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: The legend

message: Here's what the template says:
:This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations.
That's putting it very generously. There is no list of references. Instead, there's a single link that looks like a reference, but isn't. Click on it, and see for yourself how little in the Wikipedia article comes from it. And that's aside from questions about the credibility of that reference.
Are there authoritative, disinterested sources for information about this kind of tea? -- Hoary (talk) 22:59, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources?
Talk:Jack of the Philippines

message: Many countries (notably the UK) have civil ensigns, flags flown by civilians when at sea. And, navies of these countries have a different version of their maritime flags. For example, in the UK, civilian yachts wear an ensign with a red field, while their navy ships wear one with a blue field.
This wiki article is somewhat confusing. At first I thought this particular flag is for the Philippine navy's use exclusively, but after reading this article, it seems that it's implying that the flag can also be used as a civil ensign. So, my question is, is this flag for navy use only or may civilians fly it as well?
Blogie (talk) 14:13, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The wording seems to imply civilian use as well. If so, the page should be moved to "Jack of the Philippines" per WP:CONCISE. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 11:25, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civilian use
Talk:GURPS Grimoire

message: The template lists 1994 and 1998 as the publication date but when I visited the profile there are 3 errata pages: first one 1st/2nd printing, second for 3rd printing and third for 4th printing.
*http://www.sjgames.com/errata/gurps/grimoire.html updated 2 October 2000
*http://www.sjgames.com/errata/gurps/grimoire_3.html updated 24 January 2000
*http://www.sjgames.com/errata/gurps/grimoire_4.html updated 23 April 2005
Based on this it seems like we need 4 dates not 2 but I am not sure what years they came out because the errata does not specify. 184.145.18.50 (talk) 14:05, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Four printings two dates
Talk:Moller M200G Volantor

message: is this article about the Moller M200G Volantor, or the Moller Skycar M400?  Very little of this M400 stuff is relevant to this article. -  Roidroid (talk) 14:44, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much info about Moller Skycar M400 

message: This article cites only the manufacturer's website, has various hypothetical claims of economy and speeds.  Needs substantial rewrite or merge with the other Moller M200 which is virtually identical.--Pts925 (talk) 00:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Other than HOLYCRAPFLYINGSAUCER? Putting the videos into an external links section, first thing. This site is usually averse to Google Video and YouTube for obvious reasons, but we should definitely be able to use demonstration videos. This thing - or rather M200G, which seems to be the successor - is getting some attention in the media, so we'll have a lot more to work with. --Kizor 22:25, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied from the talk section of the former Moller M200X article 

message: It appears that this article had a major re-write in 2007 or so, with a lot of predictive statements from around that time.  Given the passage of time since then, it ought to be updated, with those 2007 - 08 references either removed, or re-written to occur in the past.--Plane nutz (talk) 11:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it always needs to be updated, but nothing has been published.  I suspect that there will be some info generated after their anounced "flight test".  Cheers, BatteryIncluded (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update required 
Talk:Sir Walter Clarges, 1st Baronet

message: What's the deal with the dates?  Julian/Gregorian Calendar? --Adamrush 22:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's connected. In England until 1752, the new year began on 25 March. So 31 December 1705 would be followed by 1 January 1705, and so on until 24 March 1705, which would be followed by 25 March 1706. Actual usage by people was a mix: some stuck to the legal year, while others treated 1 January as New Year's Day. Hence for dates between 1 January and 24 March inclusive, it's traditional to write both years. Sam Blacketer 22:25, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slashy dates
Talk:Algorithmic art

message: James Faure Walker's art does not seem to be generated by an algorithm.
It has been printed by inkjet printers, thus should probably be classified as "generative art".
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.150.1.75 (talk • contribs) 09:22, September 5, 2007 (UTC)
:Removed – it was a redlink anyway.  --Lambiam 08:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: James Faure Walker

message: It is not quite clear to me whether "algorist" is meant to be a general designation for all algorithmic artists – whether they know the term or not – as seems to be the use of the term by Verostko, or identifies members of specific groups that call themselves "Algorists", as seems to be the case here and particularly here. Whichever is the case, it appears to me that there is not enough meat here for a separate Algorists article.  --Lambiam 08:43, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Puis-je parler français? je pense aussi que les "algorist" font partie du Computer Art. Il faut de toute façon ajouter plusieurs autres artistes "pionniers":  par exemple si l'on se réfère au catalogue de "20th Century Computer Art: Beginnings and Developments" Tama Art University Museum, Tokyo,2007, "the work and thought of pioneers and contemporary practitioners of algorithmic art"  on ajoute: Hiroshi Kawano, George Nees, Herbert W.Franke,Frieder Nake, Eugen Roth, Wolfang Kiwus,Edward Zajec,Manfred Mohr, Roman Verostko, Vera Molnar,Hervé Huitric et Monique Nahas, Manuel Barbadillo. Liste loin d'être exhaustive.... :91.165.86.173 (talk) 14:50, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Bien sûr. N'hésitez pas! Mais qu'est-ce-que tu penses de la proposition de fusionner les articles?  --Lambiam 22:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Algorist" is a term for any person "skilled in the design and application of algorithms", not a specific group of artists. 64.3.250.66 (talk) 14:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

text: Merge completed. It's a good idea indeed to add some references.  --Lambiam 11:42, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I think this page is in urgent need of an image. Smartse (talk) 00:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . Good idea. I've grabbed a visually interesting piece from the creative commons works at Flickr. Marasmusine (talk) 11:48, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images? 

message: I think this should be a disambig between this article and Computational creativity. Semi-related discussion: Talk:Computational_creativity#Merge_from_Artificial_imagination_and_Creative_computing (We also have Computer art which this term should point to as well). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:54, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the redirect [[Computer-generated art]] that directs here correct? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jazaam02 (talk) 19:28, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Technical Writing

message: — Assignment last updated by Nsekar3234 (talk) 22:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Intro to Technical Writing
Talk:Time of arrival

message: Is synchronization really needed for TDoA? With multilateration I think it is definitly not needed. Whereas one could say with ToA, knowing an absolute time on the sender and on the receiver implies synchronization. --ThyMYthOS (talk) 12:56, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synchronization 

message: This article has several errors. Time of arrival is not the same as time of flight as a literal reading of the words indicate. More serious is the error in the second and third sentences: the speed of light in a vacuum is not a function of carrier frequency.
In the GPS-related literature that I am familiar with either term TOA or TDOA can be used to identify the general principle of operation. For example you could say GPS uses TOA or TDOA techniques by measuring (a biased) TOA and then solving systems of either N TOA equations or N-1 TDOA equations. There are lots of proofs in the literature that either system gives the same answer. The receiver and transmitter do not require time synchronization because the receiver clock error is a solution variable. There are many GPS books that would be good to reference here since GPS is where most people encounter TOA/TDOA techniques. 
-- jjmason  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.102.153.2 (talk) 21:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  introduction 
Talk:SS Politician

message: Since the Schutzstaffel (SS) were a political paramilitary organization, it is reasonable to assume that some people might search for "SS Politician(s)" when attempting to find a page listing members of that organization. I am adding an approproate distinguish tag accordingly.
2601:405:4400:9420:DD92:7FE8:6DB0:153E (talk) 06:12, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. It’s probably a good idea, but I wouldn’t be surprised if someone takes it out and quotes some arcane Wiki-law. SchroCat (talk) 06:32, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinguish tag 

message: Isn’t the flag the ship sailed under usually included in the infobox? Dronebogus (talk) 14:58, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ensign 

message: The Politician was not carrying malt whisky, as this type of whisky was not popular at that time. According to Hutchinson the brands shipped included: The Antiquary, Haig Pinch, VVO Gold Bar, Ballantine's Amber Concave, White Horse, King's Ransom, Victoria Vat, Johnnie Walker Red and Black Label, Mountain Dew, King William IV, McCallum's Perfection, King George IV, PD Special, Old Curio and Spey Royal, which are blended whiskies.
HC Stempel (talk) 17:49, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type of Whisky
Talk:List of political parties in China

message: could link this page to United Front (PRC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.51.189.235 (talk) 14:40, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to United Front (PRC)

message: This party cannot be confirmed to be in existence, it is only a urban myth, therefore it should not be included in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.17.206.49 (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese Nationalist Party (Mainland Reformed)

message: After the brief description of each party in this list, there is a link to one or more Wikipedia articles, without any explanation.  This is confusing.  I've have put them in parenthesis.  But is there any reason for these links?  If not, they should be deleted.
- Zulu Kane (talk) 00:45, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The eight registered minor parties 

message: I'm confused about the status of independents. Are they part of the United Front or not? I think the table should include them and reflect their status.—caoimhinoc (talk) 11:52, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independents 

message: A website named China Vitae lists the "Mass Movement Working Group", "People's Political Council", and some KMT groups as political parties and i think there are sources for that https://www.chinavitae.com/institution/PAR/1500. AAAAA143222 (talk) 17:47, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More parties 
Talk:Hunsingore

message: needs to be expanded, but it is still an overall good article.
If you disagree, you can delete the first line of code for the article to fix it.
You can visit my Talk Page
Evrestsebretawhtoot has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!   
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding  to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with ! 
Spread Wikicaring with Wikicookies!
 My User Page 03:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag 
Talk:Jacobite

message: It was late in my dabbing that I happened on Henry Jacob, the Jacobite of the Jacobean era, of all things.  It shows up in Henry Jessey as well, though not in John Lothropp, except in a URL of a reference. I don't think I missed any others, but there must be some link misdirected to Jacobitism somewhere.—   Randall Bart     Talk   09:52, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry Jacob
Talk:Hudswell, North Yorkshire

message: The article mentions 1881 as being the year of the first census of England (and Wales), but there are census registers from 1871 readily available. What gives? Bobber0001 (talk) 04:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: First census was 1801 but only just statistics, 1841 started to have names recorded and 1851 more detailed as most people who look at census record know them. Keith D (talk) 11:41, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed that part of text. Keith D (talk) 11:46, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  First census of England and Wales? 
Talk:Vuorineuvos

message: It would be interesting to know how much is the stamp duty exactly. However, I can't find any reference to it in the net.--Chino 10:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The following part is not relevant and does not have any sources:
most Finns still realise that for example the Finnish words vuoritekniikka and vuoriteollisuus refer to mining, not mountains.
I'd guess most Finns have never heard of these terms. Too many technology students in Wikistan? =-)
--Ikassu (talk) 09:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vuoritekniikka 

message: This article seems highly unusual.  It appears to grossly violate WP:verifiability for one thing.  But probably up to half or more of all English WP article violate WP:verifiability in some way.  My real objection is this article seems somewhat incoherent* (NOT that what is said cannot be understood, but that it gives only an incomplete and fragmented picture of what the subject of the article is really all about).  It also seems to violate WP:NPOV.  It appears to be written as a memo from the director of a company that translates titles of prestigious Finnish title-holders, including no doubt the title vuorineuvos.  Who are the translators and who are the customers?  WT...?  Apparently the customers are the holders of this title who are seeking to have their titles translated. ???  WP is not primarily about customers and translators; so at a minimum this statement needs clarification and context.  If this is a technical guide from a Finnish ministry or a translation service, that's one thing.  But that doesn't belong in WP, which s/b about elucidating, clarifying, sharing info.  A basic premise of this article seems to be that Finns or at least the honorable holders of this title are a different species and that therefore their ways or at least this specific honor is indecipherable.  I think that is at odds with the purpose of an encyclopedia including WP.  Could someone please try to make this more complete and informative so it reads more like an encyclopedia entry than an internal company memo.  This is a worthy subject and deserves more complete treatment. Paavo273 (talk) 19:01, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The article could have more sources and it could be more complete, better structured etc. but I fail seeing any any issue with the NPOV. The memo/instruction is written by an official who works for the state of Finland and I don't find any colouring in it that would favour of any instance. On the other hand, I don't understand how could a Finnish official decide about the terminology used in English language. --Gwafton (talk) 22:07, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the reply and clarification; I think you're absolutely right.  What I meant by NPOV viol. was the POV of the PM's office about translating being stated as fact.  The real problem, however, as I see it, was that translating it is ancillary at best to what the title is about and thus the wrong focus of the article. Regards, Paavo273 (talk) 03:44, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article has problems
Talk:Postojna Cave

message: It says that one named "Brilliant" is famous, but which is it? ALTON .ıl 10:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image caption 

message: That's total bullshit imo. Look at the Olm article, it doesn't say it will die on light. Also the olm pool in the cave is lit with rather strong lights. --Seba (talk) 05:12, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olm skin and flashes
Talk:Nicotinic antagonist

message: Do we need to mention varenicline here? JFW | T@lk 10:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support its inclusion. --Arcadian 19:15, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

text: I wouldn't. Varenicline is a nicotinic partial agonist, not an antagonist. Thinking of buproprion? That should be here.98.204.241.151 (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

message: Should we include rocuronium?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.57.34.53 (talk) 03:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, yes, all of the "oniums" apply.98.204.241.151 (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rocuronium 

message: Why is this listed here? Isn't succinylcholine an nictonic agonist? A depolarizing agent can't be an antagonist; the depolarization happens as a result of the agonist binding.98.204.241.151 (talk) 17:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succinylcholine 

message: We should include buproprion.98.204.241.151 (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buprorion
Talk:Ipsative

message: I removed the See Also section, which pointed to Ultima IV.  There is no relation between the 2 articles. Bmackenty (talk) 12:54, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I agree this represents possible POV bias, I don't believe there has been any edit warring over this (not that you're claiming otherwise). Therefore, it would typically be more productive to fix the article than to put a POV tag on it. Anyways, I'll look into finding good sources to address your valid concern. Ben Hocking (talk|contribs) 12:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled