lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Astley Cross

message: in response to your edit summaries: The information is being kept rather than deleted. Look at a map, note the names. Then look at a 19thC map. Astley Cross, was literally just that crossroads. Astley Cross is part of the parish of Astley. See this map where Astley Cross is within the bounds of the parish, in the top right corner. Can you please stop blocking this without direct evidence that there is enough coverage of Astley Cross to warrant its own article rather than this merge. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 00:44, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The name "Astley Cross" is in Astley, but it looks like it refers to the houses nearby, which are in the parish of Stourport, and were in Areley Kings before the parishes were merged. —Snigbrook 20:59, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is just silly. I give up. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 21:14, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that it probably isn't notable enough for an article, but it is unclear where it should be merged to (I would expect it to be in Astley because of the name, but if it is then it looks like there are no buildings there, except possibly one or two houses that are on the boundary. —Snigbrook 21:34, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

text: (after edit conflict) What's silly about that? The fact is that Astley Cross can, for different purposes, be defined as being part of Astley or of Areley Kings or of Stourport, so redirecting to any of them does the reader - remember that person who is looking for information on Astley Cross - a gross disservice. Please do give up with the edit warring and concentrate on building an encyclopedia that gives our readers the information they are looking for. By all means let's have links to the surrounding villages and towns in the article, but if a reader asks for information on Astley Cross then that is what we should give. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:41, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If there's information about it on the redirect target, then what's the problem? There is no substantial information to give a reader. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 22:29, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see my comments here. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:14, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

text: I definitely oppose a merge, its a separate village. Jenuk1985 | Talk 16:46, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

text: If you don't want words expended on bickering then why bring this up again? If you want this merged then find some evidence from reliable sources that say that it should be merged to one of the possible targets rather than any of the others. And why on earth shouldn't an encyclopedia article consist of fourteen words? If those fourteen words can tell readers looking up Astley Cross what it is then that's far better than sending them to some other article where they have to read through loads of text about other places to find the information. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:14, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Mental disorders in fiction

message: Wow, cool, so no paintings depicting Mental illness.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.103.36.58 (talk) 05:01, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There is no set order of the page and it possibly can cause confusion for someone viewing it. Also, there are additions that could be added and explained. Jjperez1 (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. WP:RMNOMINlow quorum, uncontroversial close (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 06:48, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Mental illness in fiction →  – rename for consistency, Mental illness is a redirect to Mental disorder. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:39, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 October 2021 

message: One novel that addresses mental health and addiction themes is Distorted Perceptions by Paula Puddephatt. See also, Paula's short fiction collection, Alternative Landscapes. 86.20.138.225 (talk) 07:37, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distorted Perceptions
Talk:Aston Cantlow

message: Administrators, is it felt that this matter is suitable for a work of encyclopedic nature. A senrtence has ben aded to the article with a link to a national newspaper report of the time. Views became very heated on both sides of the argument of this case and as in most cases I'm not sure the newspaper article covers all of the aspects and options open to both parties at various stages of a lentghy litigation process. I was aware of this case and decided not to mention it as I felt that it is not really the place here to cover the legal arguments in a fair and objective way to both sides. I have not removed the referemnce but thought I would open the argument up and see if a policy existed on this type of entry.Argrogan (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renovation costs battle with the Church 
Talk:Aston Eyre

message: I am amending the sentence "It is described as a chapel of ease, meaning anyone is welcome" to read with the last four words deleted and 'chapel of ease' article-linked, as this reads as a 'duff' definition of the term.  It would have been a chapel of ease of a distant parish church which this article does not identify.Cloptonson (talk) 20:00, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Aston Eyre Church
Talk:Aston Ingham

message: The official listed building listing text here gives no explanation of who "Nicholson and Son" were. Is there any source that explains that they were in fact Nicholson and Son, architects of Hereford and not this family of church architects? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:42, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. This site states that there were "Messrs. Nicholson and Son of Hereford" who worked on St. Faith's Church in Dorstone in 1889. So, it seems that this could be the same firm that work on the Aston Ingham church in 1891.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:42, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess we might be talking about Thomas Nicholson (1823-1895) of St Peter's Street, Hereford and his son, John Anthony Thompson Nicholos (died 1942), as listed in the Directory of British Architects, 1834-1914: Vol. 2 (L-Z) here? Martinevans123 (talk) 15:25, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. Yes, very possibly.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:54, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church of St John the Baptist
Talk:Aston Tirrold

message: The section headed "Origin of the name" was reverted to "Toponym" with the edit summary ""Toponym" is consistent with 100s of other English WP articles on other villages & towns." I don't think that's a very good argument, and I'd argue that "Origin of the name" is clearer and preferable. "Toponym" is just a fancy name for place name. Martinevans123 (talk) 08:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps we could see the full list of "100s of other English WP articles on other villages & towns?" Martinevans123 (talk) 21:10, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toponym
Talk:Aston, Oxfordshire

message: How does the section on pottery merit inclusion?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.187.8 (talk) 21:38, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Astwood, Buckinghamshire

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 02:55, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Diamictite

message: Hi, the description of "diamictite" given in this article resembles very closely that of a tillite. Are these terms used synonymous? In the european tradition a diamictite is rather defined by it's texture (structure), than by it's origin (like tillite is). Therefore the term diamictite may be used, when a rock looks very much like a tillite, but when it's origin is not quiet clear, or actually may very likely be different (pseudotillite), like some volcanic rocks deposited during a lahar. Greetings Geoz 21:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

message: My understanding is that the term diamictite should refer only to lithified matrix-supported sediment (of whatever origin), and that the term "diamict" should refer to unlithified sediments with these characteristics.  So I think the first image from Stolpe, Germany should be a diamict, and the other two images in the article are diamictites.  Any comments?Jstuby (talk) 17:11, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. The term diamictite is used for lithified, matrix-supported sediments. The term diamict is used for unlithified matrix-supported sediments. I have corrected the caption to reflect this distinction.Paul H. (talk) 12:04, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diamict/Diamictite 
Talk:Aswarby and Swarby

message: To 86.149.36.244:   your edit of 22 September 2010 ...  "A Watch In The Night - Pages from the History of Swarby by D Pink 115pp published by Firs publishing Lincoln 2001"... might be very relevant to this article, but it needs to include something more than the mention of a publication, something that explains why it's relevant and gives some new information about the article.  It's not likely to be a source of the small amount of information already present in the article.   Because of those things, I have reverted your edit pending more information.Twistlethrop (talk) 14:35, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Watch In The Night 

message: JSamuelWard:  You recently edited the parish description to include a mention of the hamlet of Crofton.  
I've removed that entry because it is not located in the Aswarby and Swarby CP. (see http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/boundary_map_page.jsp?u_id=10394508&c_id=10001043)
Crofton is located within Aunsby and Dembleby CP, as seen on the boundary map of that parish at http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/boundary_map_page.jsp?u_id=10396414&c_id=10001043. So, if you wish to have it included, it should be edited into Aunsby and Dembleby.  Thanks.Twistlethrop (talk) 22:33, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crofton 
Talk:Atcham

message: Care needs to be exercised before putting up someone listed as born in Atcham under the list of Notable people. Atcham was in fact the name of the births registration district which covered the town of Shrewsbury and villages in its hinterland as far west as the Wales border; its title was altered to Shrewsbury later in the 20th century. There have been a number of people listed in reference works as born at Atcham, Shropshire, who on closer biographical checking transpired to have been born in Shrewsbury and were not of families resident in Atcham parish, at a time when the registration district was titled Atcham.Cloptonson (talk) 20:18, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: People allegedly born in Atcham - caution

message: Although it is given as 1774 in the cited BBC page, the older Atcham Bridge was, according to the building listing record, built 1769-71. I have amended it accordingly with the NHLE citation (also used in John Gwynn the architect's wikipedia article) attached immediately to the mention of that bridge.Cloptonson (talk) 19:39, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Atcham (old) Bridge

message: In population, Atcham is the smallest village to be named in a UK Parliamentary constituency
I agree with the citation need raised to this statement. The article doesn't mention in first place what its population is (last published census was 2011).Cloptonson (talk) 06:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Smallest village' (to give name to constituency) claim
Talk:Attingham Park

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 17:10, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The next stage of the pilot to to look at enhancing pages relating the the most recent Top 10-most-visited National Trust sites by fixing missing citations. Please let me know if you have any concerns Lajmmoore (talk) 17:17, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot 

message: Just leaving a note here, that there is space for future work to expand and clarify what work Repton undertook at Attingham. Lajmmoore (talk) 15:00, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repton at Attingham
Talk:Aubourn Haddington and South Hykeham

message: Was this parish abolished in 1991 per the grouping order or 2011 per UKBMD and the fact sources into the 21st century appear to treat it as still a parish. I can't find any legislation on it being abolished in 2011. NOMIS does treat South Hykeham as being a separate parish in the 2011 census but "Aubourn Haddington and South Hykeham" is treated as a parish in the 2001 census,  do you know? Crouch, Swale (talk)  20:05, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like North Kesteven District Council made a bit of a mess in their reorganisation orders here. The council made the Auborn, Haddington and South Hykeham Group (Dissolution) Order 1990, purporting to dissolve a grouped parish council. This order appears to have been based on the incorrect assumption that the 1931 reorganisation had been a grouping order placing three separate civil parishes under a grouped parish council, whereas it had actually gone a step further and merged the three parishes into one. They realised in 1992 that the 1990 Order was deficient for failing to define a new boundary between South Hykeham / Aubourn with Haddington, and so passed another order defining that boundary (sourced on the page), but even with that amendment passed they hadn't explicitly abolished the old parish or created new ones. It looks like the two separate parish councils were up and running from 1991. They finally sorted it out legally in 2011 by making this 2011 Order - note article 4 which re-implements the 1990 Order but with additional wording making explicit that the effect was to create separate parishes. I'd therefore say that the parishes were de facto split in 1991, but de jure weren't split until 2011. Stortford (talk) 04:46, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I've clarified this though wording etc may still need improving. Crouch, Swale (talk)  17:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was it abolished
Talk:Aunsby

message: Merge from Aunsby: It makes little sense to have these two lightweight pages.  Most of the info on Aunsby is about Scott Willoughby!.  I would like to  create a merged page similar in structure and level of detail to Careby Aunby and Holywell: Based on the parish as a natural unit and containing separate sections for Aunsby, Dembleby, Scott Willoughby, and the lost villages.--Brunnian (talk) 16:55, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good idea to me. Occuli (talk) 17:16, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  In the absence of any other input, and given the low impact, I shall proceed with the merge and use the existing Aunsby page as a redirect--Brunnian (talk) 18:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Aycliff

message: Is there anything notable about this housing estate that warrants it having its own article? S a g a  C i t y (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I see the Aycliff article no longer exists. It has not been merged into the Dover article, because Aycliff is not mentioned there. Yet Aycliff is of interest because it is a settlement, part of which no longer exists, therefore it is part of history not to be forgotten. It was a council housing estate, which was partly demolished to make way for a new road. I have found a few pictures of the Aycliff area, which I have categorised on Commons as: Category:Aycliff, Dover. I have not removed the above reqphoto template, because there is probably no place for a photo of Aycliff on the Dover article page. It is still worth resurrecting and rewriting the deleted Aycliff article in respect of its historical value as a partially lost settlement, though. 1950s settlements can be of interest, today. Storye book (talk) 17:20, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Aycliffe Village

message: thumb|Ayresome No 12 by Manning Wardle & Co. Ltd
Do you know anything about this 0-4-0ST locomtotive named "Ayresome No.12" after being built by Manning Wardle & Co. Ltd with Works No. 1903 in 1916. It was apparently used at Aycliffe Lime & Limestone Co. Ltd, Aycliffe, Co. Durham. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aycliffe Lime & Limestone Co. Ltd, Aycliffe, Co. Durham
Talk:Ayot St Peter

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 02:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How come this town and others nearby are called Ayot, what is this? These articles could use some history too AW (talk) 19:12, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is Ayot
Talk:Aythorpe Roding

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 02:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Babingley

message: Removed the travel guide|article|date=September 2008 tag placed on this page placed on it by  User:Davidwr as I see no justification for it. There is no mention of Hotels/Guesthouse, Restaurants, Public house ect, thing you would expect in a travel guide. User:Davidwr seems to have missed the point as far as utilizing this Tag correctly.    stavros1  ♣ 20:52, 02 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed the travel guide tag
Talk:Babworth

message: I will delete from the page the uncited sole name in the section "Notable people from Babworth" of William Gleaden because he does not yet have an article in wikipedia. The MM was the most unsparingly given gallantry award among non-commissioned ranks in WWI and lacks the rarity and notability attachable to holders of the VC. The name can be reinstated if the person ever has a wikipedia article created.
* William Gleaden – winner of Military Medal, World War I
Cloptonson (talk) 06:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable people from Babworth (not notable)
Talk:Valvata cristata

message: Biology of this species was described by MYZYK "Life cycle of Valvata cristata in the laboratory" Folia Malacologica 2002 Vol.10(2) (www.foliamalacologica.com).
--188.146.255.206 (talk) 19:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Added to the article. --Snek01 (talk) 22:37, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Life cycle
Talk:Backford Cross

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
Snowy 1973 (talk) 02:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Bacton, Norfolk

message: "Amenities in the village include two public houses (The Duke of Edinburgh and The Ship), The Keswick Hotel, two fish and chip shops, Bobby's restaurant, The Ocean Liner bar, Rasheed's Indian takeaway, and two caravan parks (Castaways and Cable Gap)."
As far as I remember there is only one Fish and Chip shop in Bacton. I can't locate "Rasheed's Indian takeaway", Bobby's Restaurant or the Ocean Liner bar anywhere in Norfolk. Technically, "The Ship" is in Mundesley (not Bacton.) 
There are three caravan sites in Bacton ("The Leas" has been forgotten.)
I gleaned much of the above from Yell! (as well as personal memory - Bacton isn't exactly a metropolis...) If I can't locate anything to verify the claims made in the article then I move that it be amended.  Paul-b4 (talk) 10:01, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facilities 

message: One of the main characteristics of Bacton is its profile as a non-typical seaside village. While many British seaside towns have a large percentage of migrating residents (using houses as second or weekend/holiday homes), Bacton has maintained a solid base of local residents while mixing occasionally frequent near-local residents.
Sources?
There appear to be a large number of privately owned site-based "Holiday cottages" (some of which look little more than Butlin's styled chalets), which appear to outnumber more traditional housing stock. I would estimate that the summer population of Bacton is substantially greater than the winter population, putting it in line with most other holiday resorts (remember that Bacton is only a small place, so it would only take a small number of "migrating residents" to throw the figures out.) Paul-b4 (talk) 08:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics
Talk:GOCR

message: Did it work?  Is it command-line based?  Is it tricky to use? Maikel 22:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Has anyone tried it?

message: I was searching for JOCR.exe and was redirected to this page.  After looking at the external link, it does not appear that this is the same program and I am not sure why JOCR redirects here.  JOCR should at least have a disambiguation entry.  Unfortunately, I have no idea how to make that happen.
203.113.29.169 (talk) 07:03, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The redirect is correct - JOCR and GOCR are the same application projects. See homepage. These are Linux projects, so would not be JOCR.exe, which seems to be a different project article. If there were an article on JOCR.exe then there would be a disambiguation link, but right now it would be a redlink only. JOCR.exe does not link to this page, but JOCR does.- Ahunt (talk) 11:09, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect from JOCR 
Talk:Badger, Shropshire

message: While I admire the detail put in about Badger's local history, especially the Hawkins Browne era, I have deleted an amount of detail about his activities in parliament which are well covered almost word for word in his wikipedia biography article, as these are less germane to the local history of Badger. I have left a token amount of detail that acknowledges that he was a county high sheriff and local MP.Cloptonson (talk) 16:08, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Isaac Hawkins Browne (coal owner)|Isaac Hawkins Browne]]
Talk:Bagwyllydiart

message: I've always wanted to know how to pronounce this name. If it were in Wales then that would be easy (albeit dialect variations towards the English border do throw up some surprises) but since it's in England, I imagine usual Welsh pronunciation rules probably don't apply! It would approximate bag-oo-euh-thlid-ee-art.  Anyone know a source for adding this information? cheers Geopersona (talk) 09:11, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation