Talk:Montenegrin Orthodox Church

message: Hadzija, its history is not closely related to the SOC. --PaxEquilibrium 21:38, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I see I have hit a wall of nationalism. Have it your way, but know that the reality is there whether you choose to face it or not.--Hadžija 22:50, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: MOC uses montenegrin, not serbian language. Nenaad  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.46.255.145 (talk) 03:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: According to the article about Njeguši, there are 17 people in that village. But then there are a dozen settlements of the tribe of the same name, and according to the present page, at least 5 churches? – Kaihsu (talk) 18:05, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Njeguši? 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20061019062102/http://www.mitropolija.cg.yu/aktuelno/saopstenja/e000808.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Psychonaut (talk) 07:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Montenegrin Orthodox Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110722171733/http://www.cedem.me/fajlovi/editor_fajlovi/istrazivanja/CEDEM_oktobar09.pdf to http://www.cedem.me/fajlovi/editor_fajlovi/istrazivanja/CEDEM_oktobar09.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050516153636/http://90.1911encyclopedia.org:80/M/MO/MONTENEGRO.htm to http://90.1911encyclopedia.org/M/MO/MONTENEGRO.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Montenegrin Orthodox Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110823062145/http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/main/news/10958/ to http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/main/news/10958/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927003339/http://www.vijesti.cg.yu/naslovna.php?akcija=vijest&id=232898 to http://www.vijesti.cg.yu/naslovna.php?akcija=vijest&id=232898
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Montenegrin Orthodox Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.moc-cpc.org/Istorija/Istorijat_L.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.moc-cpc.org/Istorija/Istorijat_L.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041028022854/http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2000/kosovo/notebook/0127/ to http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2000/kosovo/notebook/0127/
*Added  tag to http://www.montenegro.org/religion.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:52, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Montenegrin Orthodox Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224025341/http://www.alo.rs/vesti/22668/Ustasa_osniva_pravoslavnu_crkvu to http://www.alo.rs/vesti/22668/Ustasa_osniva_pravoslavnu_crkvu
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606223506/http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2008&mm=01&dd=12&nav_id=46869 to http://www.b92.net/eng/news/politics-article.php?yyyy=2008&mm=01&dd=12&nav_id=46869
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110912011410/http://www.cedem.me/fajlovi/editor_fajlovi/istrazivanja/CEDEM_februar07.pdf to http://www.cedem.me/fajlovi/editor_fajlovi/istrazivanja/CEDEM_februar07.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:56, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: When I visit this page last time, the infobox was already good as going for. But, when I seeing this again for a while now, this new version of the page's infobox may lean to not belong here, and possibly written in a more pro-Serbian nationalist point of view, if it's given away on the user's categories under the user's prime page. As given it's meant to be a internationally noncanonical Eastern Orthodox Church, not treated as only just the property of Montenegrin government, given what that user thinking when trying to 'cleaning' this part. And if this one is somehow special, comparing to the noncanonical (and independent) Eastern Orthodox Churches like Abkhazian Orthodox Church and the second Ukrainian Orthodox Church under the Kiev Patriarchy. Chad The Goatman (talk) 20:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganized and added another infobox to differ the two to reduce seemly an bias in the current version of the page's infobox 

message: Not sure why the term "canonically unrecognized" has repeatedly been removed from the article. That is precisely how the CPC is described in a myriad of reliable sources. A few examples:
*
*
*
*
*
*
It's good to see that the latest removal was reverted.  I would encourage any editors who wish to remove the term "canonically unrecognized" to use the talk page and try to form a consensus. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 18:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description