Talk:Richard Sorge

message: So sorry there's no discussion on this item. The story of Sorge is just one of many thousands of fates of Stalin's era but this by a flick of chance became known widely. (If you don't aware of how this happened - Nikita S. Khrushchyov once saw a French movie of the Sorge group - because one of his guy was a French - and he - Mr. Commie General - was very much astonished because even he was unfamiliar with such name.He quired his KGB brass, they said this was not their field so he switched to his Soviet Army Headquarters Intelligence Dept. (GRU - the 2nd General Dept. of the HQ) and they confirmed: "Yes, Sir! There was such intelligence battle station (non-legal,as this is called in Russian) "Ramzai" in Tokyo before WWII,uncovered by the police, all arrested, sent to trial etc. So puzzled and surprized Maiz Disseminator awarded The Ramzai with the medal "The Hero of The Soviet Union" with the "Order of Lenin" - the highest both military/civil honor in the former USSR.).
Here we encounter with a problem unseen at first sight. What for? What he was praised for?
--This: "Before the battle for Moscow, Sorge transmitted information that Japan was not going to attack Soviet Union in the East. This information allowed Georgy Zhukov to redeploy Siberian troops for the defense of Moscow." seems worthy of high praise, don't you think?
Official Soviet propoganda claimed that Sorge's battle group was operating on the territory of the sovereign foreign state (the Japanese Empire) just with the peaceful intentions to prevent the war between the USSR and Germany so, in other words, their its activity was not aimed at Japan but against the third party - Fascism.
Good'n'clever so far. If only this would not be a lie!
Does anyone have the citation for the award to Sorge of the decorations "The Hero of The Soviet Union" with the "Order of Lenin"?--Marktunstill 17:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not really a lie. It appears in the documents remaining in Japan from the interrogation of Sorge. It is what he claimed, and his defense. He was claiming that the information retrieved were general knowledge to the Japanese public. It was his only chance of escaping.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dorum (talk • contribs) 11:39, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Background discussion

message: anyone knows the content of the 1960 movie "who are you, Dr. Sorge ?" ? ... also published as a book in Germany.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055350/ says it is a 1961 production written by Hans-Otto Meissner.   Dr Meissner became Third Secretary at the German embassy in Tokyo in 1936 according to Target Tokyo The Story of the Sorge Spy Ring by Gordon Prange with Donald M Goldstein and Katherine V Dillon.--Marktunstill 17:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps, at least I should agree. BTW, he was not unique to be awarded this title. Some other Soviet agents did, e.g.: L.Manevich, I.Kudrya, K.Vaupshasov. Cmapm 18:41, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Likewise in the Whittaker Chambers article, his Presidential Medal of Freedom award is at the bottom of the page.  Incredibly high honor for someone who at one time betrayed his own country. Perhaps we can work out a uniform format for all these articles. Nobs01 18:51, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would defend such things to be on top only for rare/unusual cases, like these two ones. General policy in Wiki, as I understand, is to place awards and honors after the main content, and I think it's reasonable. Cmapm 19:47, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: Also, what about putting Sorge in [Category:German journalists], that would link him with Hede Massing, who evidently met him & wrote about him.  Nobs01 21:14, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. I thought, that either a [Category:German journalists] or  [Category:Journalists] was already added into the article. I have a book mostly with articles, which he wrote for German newspapers about Japan. I can say, that in my view, he was a very talented journalist. I'll add the category right now. Cmapm 23:31, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie Content?

message: Please note Agnes Smedley is not written into the narrative yet.  Thank you. nobs 18:54, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For purposes of guilt by association, I presume.--Jack Upland (talk) 10:54, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Agnes Smedley]]

message: The intro and the closing "conspiracy theory" section" says Sorge worked for the KGB & "continuned to work for the KGB"; the body of the text says he was transferred to GRU in 1930.  This needs to be clarified. nobs 01:17, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: KGB or GRU

message: How Sorge could transmit information related with Stalingrad siege if he was arrested in 1941? :-)--Nixer 14:04, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: His uncle had been a secretary for Karl Marx.
Uncle or grandfather? --Morpheios Melas 07:29, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I read version that it was "brother of grandfather" in rusian it named "двоюродный дед" ("брат деда", или "дядя отца"). In english it "grand uncle" ("great uncle") or not?--Morpheios Melas 11:00, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In English it's "great uncle", yes.  Not "grand uncle".  Binabik80 (talk) 22:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncle or grandfather? 

message: I've reffed Gordon Prange's book; 550 pages but very readable. If read with Whybrant's book, the English-speaking novice will find out all the grey areas.Stamboul 12:48, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prange's book 

message: The article says, "In 1920 he graduated with a Ph.D. in political science." in Richard Sorge#Early_life.  Later, in Richard Sorge#Posthumous_comment_and_analyses, it says, "However, Sorge never studied for a doctorate."
Obviously there is a contradiction here, but I do not know which is true so I cannot correct it. --Danny Rathjens 15:24, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ph.D. contradiction 

message: "Sorge was survived by his mother, still living in Germany." That's very bad wording. How could his mother be still alive if he was born in 1895? --193.6.17.39 (talk) 12:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Survived by his mother, still living in Germany? 

message: "[...] Sorge alerte:
« 170 divisions allemandes massées sur frontière soviétique attaqueront sur ensemble frontière le 21 juin - STOP - Direction effort principal Moscou. »
[...] Churchill, « Lucie », Sorge, etc. Staline n'a cure de ces mises en garde. Aucune ordre, aucune directive ne mettront l'Armée rouge en état d'alerte. Partout, elle sera surprise par Barbarossa. 
MONTAGNON, Pierre. La Grande Histoire de la Seconde Guerre Mondiale (Volume II) De l'Armistice à la Guerre du Désert, pg. 306-307.
Plastic Racoon (talk) 01:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible source for the information supplied concerning the launch date of Operation Barbarossa 

message: Battle of Stalingrad began in July of 1942. Sorge was arrested in October of 1941. That was during the Battle of Moscow, around the time when it was widely believed that Moscow will fall and hence any war in the south would be a non-issue. So how exactly could Sorge say find out and transmit any useful info about Stalingrad-related events if at the time (in 1942) he was in Japanese prison? 76.24.104.52 (talk) 07:27, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't believe I missed noticing that nonsense. Time for some editing. Whyman's very good book on Sorge mentions Stalingrad solely as follows: "Sorge's joy was boundless on the day in November 1942 when he heard of the Soviet counter-offensive at Stalingrad. This, he perceived, put paid to Hitler's hopes of vanquishing Russia." - Salmanazar (talk) 13:57, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did Sorge send info about Battle of Stalingrad if he was in prison at the time? 

message: In reading this article, I came across this text at the bottom, under the heading "Conspiracy Theory": An interesting but rather little-known conspiracy theory of the Cold War held that Richard Sorge had only been "mock-executed" by the Japanese and had actually been returned to the Soviet Union where he continued to work for the KGB. Though many mysteries of the Cold War have been solved since the fall of communism in the USSR, no proof of this theory has emerged. In one of his novels, M.E. Chaber (pen-name of Ken Crossen), an American writer who penned the Milo March detective series, has his hero meet an unnamed Russian master-spy who, the book hints, is none other than Richard Sorge. So basically, this is a conspiracy theory that is "interesting" (to whom?), but without any proof whatsoever, and seems to be only notable in that it was used as a minor plot device in a spy novel.  I can't see any reason why this should be included here beyond possibly mentioning that he's been popular as a fictionalized character in spy novels.  Certainly, the reprinting of an already admittedly "little-known" crank conspiracy theory in a biographical article is totally inappropriate. siafu (talk) 23:24, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "Conspiracy Theory" section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Richard Sorge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060207092252/http://www.spy-sorge.com/ to http://www.spy-sorge.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:49, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Regarding your edit where your edit summary says:
:I never understood why you removed Dad's dates.   If your father is 43 when you're born you are a different person from the person you would be if he was 23.   Ditto if he dies when you're 12 rather than when you're 2 or 20 or 40.   It's all part of you.   Or am I missing something obvious?
I am fine with your restoring both birth and death dates.  Originally it just had "(d. 1907)", which makes it like an incident that is part of the chronology of Richard's life, and based on where it is in the text that date makes the chronology confusing.  So I removed it and said in my edit summary that restoring his life was fine, as you have.  By giving the full length of his life, it's not so confusing.
In summary, I'm fine with your edit and the issue is settled unless other editors have different ideas.
While I have your attention, I did create a Wikipedia article for his father (Gustav Wilhelm Richard Sorge) based on the German article and information and sources from this article.  If you would like to help me improve that article, and look for any errors I might have made, please come on by.   Do you speak German?  I studied German 4-5+ years, but at times I still have trouble deciphering the exact meaning of the German writings.
I have one more question below about sources.
--David Tornheim (talk) 18:53, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father's dates 

message: The WP:LEDE mentions a trial, and there is a section Arrests and Trials.  However, there is no mention of any trial(s) in the actual text of the WP:BODY.  In the Comments about Sorge section, one quote comes from "Mitsusada Yoshikawa, Chief Prosecutor in the Sorge trials who obtained Sorge's death sentence."  So I think it safe to say there was at least one trial.  It would helpful to have more text on that--with WP:RS of course.  The same paragraph of the WP:LEDE that mentions a trial also mentions one count of espionage.  Is it just one? One cannot really tell what exactly he was formally charged with in the body either.   --David Tornheim (talk) 07:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point - and nearly 2½ years later (and a time when many people have had unlimited free time to search, read and contribute because of the pandemic), there is STILL not a word about the contents of any trial, even in the section named "Arrests and trial"! ^_^ I figure no doubt the trial was held behind locked doors, but it's still an amazing omission in such a high-profile article about a legendary master spy. We can safely assume that there was some kind of trial and a proper death sentence, the guy didn't just "disappear". 188.150.64.57 (talk) 21:10, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trials 

message: The introductory section veered off into details, and debate about those details, which are more appropriately covered in section 2.4 of the article:
Various writers have speculated that this information allowed Stalin to transfer 18 divisions, 1,700 tanks, and over 1,500 aircraft from Siberia and the Far East to the Western Front against the western Axis Powers during the Battle for Moscow. However, Soviet code-breakers had broken the Japanese diplomatic codes, and Moscow already knew from signals intelligence that there would be no Japanese attack on the Soviet Union in 1941.
Then there's this seemingly tacked on information about something else entirely, which is no where mentioned in the main article:
While his message and the decoding of the Japanese diplomatic codes may have facilitated the Soviets knowing Japan's intentions, Richard Sorge can still be credited for his spy ring which helped an American, James "Jack" Turner Stephens, Jr., conduct a phone call between Stalin, Churchill and Roosevelt. Jack was sent to facilitate the connection between the United States and directly to Soviet telephone networks. This was the only secure passage for a phone call for Roosevelt to talk directly to Stalin without having to cross Nazi Europe. It was this phone call that Roosevelt gave Stalin his bond allowing for Stalin to move his divisions from Siberia to rescue Moscow from German forces.
I removed both these from the Intro.
- - Zulu Kane (talk) 04:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: Просьба сведущим исправить полнейшую белиберду, записанную как награды Рихарда Зорге. 95.31.164.29 (talk) 17:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Награды Зорге 

message: Просьба сведущим исправить полнейшую белиберду, записанную как награды Рихарда Зорге. 95.31.164.29 (talk) 17:39, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Награды Зорге