Talk:Barenaked Ladies Are Me

message: I don't understand this at all. So it's a double album and they are being released at different times? --Macarion 00:29, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What the album is "considered" is debatable, but because the entire 29 tracks were recorded at once, and they will all be sold at once under the name Barenaked Ladies Are Me on itunes and online (in some places 25 or 27 tracks, but still parts of the second disc). There will also be a limited run of 2-disc digipacks with both (probably with the 2nd CD saying Barenaked Ladies Are Men). However, the true second disc, in the form of a physical CD, sold on its own won't be out until early 2007, except in Canadian Starbucks. Because all the music was recorded together, and will be released together in a few forms, and the double digipack, and the names being almost identical, it's being thought of as one collection of music, and thus a double album. As much as anything can be counted as single and double in an age of downloadable music. TheHYPO 04:29, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The band themselves have said (On the podcast over the last few months) that they consider this a double album Aquarion 16:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

text: The song was released on the iTunes Originals series without the commas as well, so I'd say the released title is correct Aquarion 16:19, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. Changed (and a few other grammars) based on the deluxe edition. I had already done the first half, but didn't have an official copy of the second disk to confirm. TheHYPO 12:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify, the digital booklet for the album lists the song with Commas in its TOC... however, the lyric entry has it listed without commas as in the printed book. I tend to follow the latter which corresponds to the back listing on the physical album too. I am not a fan of inconsistancy, but sometimes it just happens. I cite Shoe Box v. Shoebox (1996), The Old Apartment v. Old Apartment (1997), and Capitalization of words like "a" "of" "the" in a good number of songs depending on the release. TheHYPO 01:18, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

text: It's looking more and more like the 2nd half will have more than the 12 songs the Starbucks version had. In any event, onsale will be the first week of February, so we should have an official tracklist any day now TheHYPO 17:35, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Received the UK Promo, and it definitely does have 16 tracks and includes the download only bonus tracks. Mike 81.179.115.21 23:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: From my research, the released versions of the album (BLAMen) feature the full 16 tracks, so the additional asterisk on the track list is redundant. I think a better idea would be to say those tracks WEREN'T included on the Starbucks pre-release, as that's the exception, not the rule. KingDaveRa 17:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Whether or not BNL think this is a double album (why didn't they release it as such then?), both albums came out separately and, as such, each album warrants its own page.  BGC 12:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Albums split

message: I support deleting this comment as it seems un-neutral, implying that the album not going gold is a failure in some way or that the album should be expected to go gold without any context. The band's previous album (Everything to Everyone) did not go gold either, so it's not the first time this has happened, not does it seem like it was expected to. Discuss TheHYPO 01:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed -- the comment seems out of place and unnecessary. JPG-GR 02:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failure to Go Gold. 

message: :Image:BNLMe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:BNLMe.jpg

message: :Image:Wind It Up HIRES.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wind It Up HIRES.jpg

message: :Image:Cover-easy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Cover-easy.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Barenaked Ladies Are Me. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080725030446/http://werkshop.com/ to http://www.werkshop.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Barenaked Ladies Are Me. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012183439/http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/11/144647.php to http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/11/144647.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Barenaked Ladies Are Me. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120605020251/http://thesims2.ea.com/getcoolstuff/music.php to http://thesims2.ea.com/getcoolstuff/music.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:53, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I was wondering why "One Little Slip" redirects here, when according to the article, that song doesn't actually appear in this album? Is the article mistaken or is it an invalid redirect? Trainer Alex (talk) 20:31, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  One Little Slip redirect