lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gerboise Bleue (nuclear test)

message: i don't know why someone told the bomb was 20kt while it was actually 70kt. you jealous! :) i have corrected it though Cliché Online 01:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 20kt

message: Cliché Online 01:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: full report

message: *Synthesis of the aerial tests: this official chart has every infos needed. it only needs to be translated in english, i dunno if i'll get time to do it myself. Cliché Online 02:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: translation chart

message: national audiovisual institute including exclusive video at ground zero and never seen before rushes of anti-saharian nuclear tests/pro independence FLN protesters in new york!! as well as the infamous B2-Namous top secret base used to develop chimical warfare. i will make screenshots! :) Cliché Online 10:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: woohoohoo! found a crazy archive of an atomic attack simulation with aircrafts and everything! :)
*here "EN CAS DE MALHEUR" Cliché Online 11:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: archive videos

message: I fixed some grammar errors and style inconsistencies.
The original author was not a native anglophone (though with excellent English ability) causing some grammar and usage errors, and a sentence style sometimes not optimal English. (Run-on sentences, several of which I broke up.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rrostrom (talk • contribs) 23:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor cleeanup 

message: The article states (without reference) that the tests were named for the French tricolor. But later in the article it is disclosed that there were actually 4 tests, the fourth being "Green" , and having nothing to do with the tricolor. Perhaps it's true that that was the original ratioanle, but it'd be nice to see some supporting references. Isarig 02:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  tricolor 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Baltimore County Public Library

message: Why aren't we using any of the standard citation types for these refs? That's a whole line (or more) of text in each entry whose primary effect is to require more vertical scrolling and to break up the flow of the timeline. DMacks 00:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your help with the Baltimore County Public Library article. It was created by another staff member, with many errors, including the name of the page, and then assigned to me to correct. Unfortunately, the person who created the page left with the account, password and all the experience. Could you tell I had quite a learning curve?
Regarding the citing of sources, I’ve removed all the individual source information. I hope the link at the top of History will suffice. 
I don’t anticipate doing any more edits for awhile.Infoserv 23:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation style 

message: Wikipedia Manual of Style explicitly states that decades are formatting as "1920s" not "1920's", which is in keeping with standard English meaning of the apostrophe. I am again fixing them. Please do not revert MOS-fix-changes without explaining why. DMacks 08:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting of dates 

message: Why would we want this to have the date with a bullet indented under the previous-date—isn't the date more like a header for the material that follows it? I had changed it to a standard definition list—a list where each entry is a term followed by an explanation of it—but this change was reverted with no explanation. Why shouldn't this be formatted as a deflist, or else with use of standard wiki headers for each date? DMacks 08:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Two weeks with no comment, so I'll re-fix it. Do not re-re-change it without discussing first. DMacks 20:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting of history list 

message: I believe that the history section for this article is way too long and needs to be shortened to only the most revelant points. If anyone has any opinion on this matter, please tell me, so we can figure what the best size of the history section should be.JHoltzman 15:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size of History Section
Talk:Vanguard (rocket)

message: The articles belonging to the Juno Rocket and the one about the Jupiter-C claim that the launch vehicle for the first american satellite Explorer 1 to 3 was such a rocket and not a Vanguard rocket. Because I'm not really sure (born afterwards in 1972) I would ask the author to rethink the intro of the Vanguard rocket and also the listing at the end.
Thanks, Paule   1:50 UCT, 14. December 2006
:The Vanguard was the first American rocket to attempt a satellite launch on 6/12/57. The first stage engine failed less than five seconds after launch, and the rocket fell back to earth, exploding on the pad. The Juno-1 performed the first successful launch on 1/2/58. --GW_SimulationsUser Page | Talk 11:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Something wrong

message: Payload capacity jumped from 22.7 lb to 22.7 kg (50 lb) from Vanguard SLV 6 to Vanguard 3. That is an 220% diff. Is there any account of why or how Vanguard 3 became so much more powerfull in relation to his antecessor ? 177.53.145.242 (talk) 11:32, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Something wrong II

message: It seems to me that this article and the  corresponding  project article need to be re-organized a bit to put the rocket history here and the project information in the other, with brief sections in each summarizing and cross-referencing the other.  Probably the Vanguard technical history, "The Vanguard Satellite Launching Vehicle — An Engineering Summary". B. Klawans. April 1960, 212 pages. Martin Company Engineering Report No 11022, should be primary here, and Green and Lomask, NASA SP 4202, needs to be the primary reference for the project.  There would still need to be some overlap, and each article needs to be able to stand on its own, but I think they could use some cleaning up.  Wwheaton (talk) 03:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested reorganization w/r "Project Vanguard" article 

message: The last line under "Launches" says the Vanguard 3 satellite was "22.7 kg (50 lb)".
The link on the reference is broken.
Earlier in the "Launch Summary" section, it says "successfully orbited the 24 kilograms 
(53 lb) Vanguard 3 satellite". This is about the same as in the Wikipedia article at
"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vanguard_3" which says "Mass of the satellite was 
approximately 23.7 kg (52 lb)". The link on the reference given is working.
EinkomischerKauz (talk) 07:12, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vanguard 3 Satellite Mass
Talk:Daio Wasabi Farm

message: The farm's official website has the name as "Daio" (without the macron) so please do not move the article. Redirects are in place for other romanizations. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Someone on the AFD said it's the world's largest wasabi farm, not just Japan's.  Is that true? —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-14 19:36Z
:I wouldn't be surprised as there are only one or two of the farms outside of Japan (that I've heard of). Wasabi is very difficult to grow, and the "fields" (more like gently flowing rivers) where it grows require constant maintenance. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  largest
Talk:Clive Caldwell (squash player)

message: I've just created this page, and it needs expansion. I'm searching for more specific information. I don't think it's legitimately a speedy delete candidate. Other pages in Wikipedia show that Caldwell was a finalist at major international squash tournaments – see: United States Open (squash) and Tournament of Champions (squash). And the first paragraph of this article should confirm that he was indeed one of the leading players on the North American hardball squash circuit in the 1970s. Zaxem 00:56, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Defence against speedy delete nomination
Talk:Gulet

message: This article hasn't been written by an English speaker and many sentences are hard to understand. I'd happily correct them if I knew what they meant.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.236.136 (talk) 21:53, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article still needs rewriting, although I did find it useful. By chambers does it mean cabins? If it means schooner why are the pictures of ketches? Also it needs sources.Billlion (talk) 07:09, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: English 

message: Information contained on this Wiki page (Gulet) is plagiarized and paraphrased from http://www.zephyriayachting.com.tr/newconstruction.htm, without any link or attribution. The changes made are also inaccurate.
---
Original:
The procedure of building boats today has changed very little over the centuries. The changes to the basic plank-on-frame method are superficial but significant: advanced tools now allow craftsman to design and deliver far more precision than they used to be able to by hand, and laminated epoxy materials allow for fantastic durability.
Wiki entry:
The procedure of building boats today has changed very little over the centuries. The changes to the basic plank-on-frame method are superficial. Electrical tools now allow craftsman to sand and shape wood faster and with more precision than they used to be able to by hand, and laminated epoxy allows for increased design options.  
---
Original:
A properly maintained gulet can last over thirty years. Each winter, boats need to be taken out of the water and the hulls scrubbed and given a thick coat of varnish in addition to other routine maintenance.
Wiki entry:
A properly maintained gulet can last over thirty years. Each winter most boats must be taken out of the water and the hulls scrubbed and given a thick coat of paint in addition to other routine maintenance
:*I have checked Internet Archive#Wayback Machine and this article's history: it does seem to be a WP:COPYVIO and I have deleted most the offending text, in accord with policy. Thanks User:65.94.191.105 for pointing this out. --Old Moonraker 15:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:António Martins de Chaves

message: I've seen on many places references to this bishop/cardinal as "António" as well as "Antão". Within WP, the english has the article with the first name, but portuguese has it with "Antão". His tomb in Rome has "Antonii" in latin; however the Patriarch of Lisbon's website mentions him as "Antão".
I think we should consider if this article should be moved to Antão Martins de Chaves, or stay as is and create a redirect from António Martins de Chaves. Parutakupiu talk || contribs 01:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that at the very least Antão Martins de Chaves should be a redirect to António Martins de Chaves. Cattus 17:55, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: António or Antão?
Talk:University Hill Elementary School

message: Once the AFD is cleared away, I recommend this article be moved to University Hill Elementary School (Vancouver) on the basis that there are likely other schools in the US or Canada with the same name. 23skidoo 13:15, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We can deal with that when someone DOES make an article about a school with the same name. Right now, there's no need to disambiguate. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 01:14, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested retitling of article
Talk:Armenian Air Force

message: Armenian pilots train with the diamon da 40 and 42 >
http://images.google.nl/imgres?imgurl=http://www.aviation.am/eng/gorc/images/gyumri%25202.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.aviation.am/eng/gorc/aeroport.htm&usg=__K9PeVj4sFsL8q5BVXEwG-TsRumM=&h=150&w=200&sz=55&hl=nl&start=3&um=1&tbnid=qXFj1YfeLSJhWM:&tbnh=78&tbnw=104&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dgyumri%2Bairport%26hl%3Dnl%26sa%3DN%26um%3D1
and Armenia got mig29 in the armenian/russian airbase in erebuni...!
:I think the actual link you meant to supply was this one for the [Air Training Center].  Please note that it only states that this center trains private and commercial pilots.  The Air Training Center is established on the base of the military's Training Center, but the source makes clear that these are distinct organizations and the Civil Air Training Center falls under the auspices of the Ministry of Education and Science, not the armed forces.  There is nothing here that says this center trains military aircrew, much less on Diamond aircraft.
:As for the MiG-29s, I've heard the reports, but I have not found reliable evidence. If it's true that Russia gave or sold MiG-29s to Armenia, there must be reliable sources that say so.  Can you provide any?  Thanks, Askari Mark (Talk) 16:17, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, if Armenia does have any MiG-29s, this picture is not of them. It was taken of a Russian formation, so please quit changing this – or please add a non-copyrighted image that is clearly of an Armenian MiG-29. I am re-adding the Su-25 image because these are undisputedly of Armenian aircraft (and of a type that has been used in military operations). Askari Mark (Talk) 16:25, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  training aircraft 

message: I removed the entry about Armenia lacking air superiority fighters.  The SU-30MKs purchased by Armenia are multi-role fighters, which includes air superiority.  If there is any objection to this, please, let me know.
ArmenianSniper (talk) 08:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Air Superiority
Talk:Siderurgy

message: Oppose merge of steel into this.  This very brief article might perhaps be merged into steel.  However Siderurgy is not a usual English term, but the transliteration of a French one.  The best solution would be to leave this brief article to explain the term, with suitable cross-references to articles on iron and steel.  Peterkingiron 01:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

message: In view of the recent tag placed by user:Wizard191, I have to say that I agree that I am not sure of the value of this article.  It is possible that it should be transwikified to the dictionary or converted to a redirect (perhaps to ironworks).  It reached its present state when I intervened to discourage its expansion, because there are better articles covering the subject elsewhere.  This has left it as a sort of disambiguation page, which is what the ironworks is.  Having spent a lot of time merging and otherwise eliminating unnecessary duplication, which can easily have the result that articles start contrdicting each other, I was reluctant to see another lot of duplicates developing.  I am open to suggestions on the best course of action.  Peterkingiron (talk) 20:59, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's pointless to have an article about a concept already covered.  I've redirected to ironwork -- Whpq (talk) 01:28, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You actually redirected to ironworks not ironwork.  What you did is probably the most appropriate.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do you feel ironwork is more appropriate?  In thinking some more, I'd actually be more inclined to redirect to Smelting. -- Whpq (talk) 23:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not express what I meant well, and have altered it.  I do NOT think ironwork appropraite.  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it appears we both can't type worth beans! :)  But the result was what was intended.  I really did intend to redirect to the plural, and you agree that's the right place.  Cheers! -- Whpq (talk) 14:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed!  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:31, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Value
Talk:Swindon North (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I've added a "Members of Parliament" section; the article ought to have one, and it looks as if the MP will change next time, regardless of the outcome. Moonraker12 (talk) 15:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: Out of interest why is the article called North Swindon, the constituency is Swindon North. A minor point, but just piqued my curiousity. beardybloke (talk) 11:24, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The official documentation says North (and South) Swindon), that is why. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 13:08, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Interesting, everything else I've read refers to them as Swindon North and Swindon South. Thanks. beardybloke (talk) 12:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Also listed as North and South at the Parliament web site, the Office of National Statistics, but the Guardian and the BBc have them listed the other way. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constituency name
Talk:Swindon South (UK Parliament constituency)

message: There’s been some useful additions here, but I’ve removed a speculative paragraph from the "Constiuency history" section, as WP is not a crystal ball. Moonraker12 (talk) 15:01, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: Why is this constituency called "South Swindon" as though it was a county, rather than "Swindon South" as it is a borough? Fig (talk) 22:09, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The ward boundaries changed in 2012 so this section is out of date.  I don't know the area so don't want to attempt an update myself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.57.253.190 (talk) 16:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Boundaries

message: Now the General Election has been called the new revised boundaries are in effect (alright, technically from 30th May). Should we rename this article to "Swindon South" to reflect the new name? Same goes for the North Swindon / Swindon North article too, of course. Patch86UK (talk) 13:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I've placed a move request for the article so that it can be renamed. MiaClarkWebb (talk) 15:21, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:Line of succession to the Serbian throne

message: The succession to the throne is contested by Prince Alexander of Yugsolavia, born 1924. The line presented in this article does not show the sources on which it relies: Most dynastic succession lists include Alexander and his issue, and their inclusion was not challenged by the senior branch until all members of the dynasty were allowed back into the country and began feuding over the former royal property and perceived personal slights. Lethiere 01:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dispute
Template talk:Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

message: Changes needed:
1.  Removal of POV (Kingpin, Mentor)
2.  Add more categories as to make this a useful guide to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad-related articles.
I can carry out the first part, but the second needs a variety of suggestions.  The Behnam 01:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

message: No photo is needed on the template. Two editors have said this and removed them, so don't add photos again. Izzedine 02:44, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Network redirector

message: I think that this sentence could be uplifted to convey a much more clear message:
* Networks Hosts communicate through use of this client software: Shells, Redirectors and Requesters.
Could someone guess the original message and update the sentence?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.245.82.2 (talk) 22:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear sentence
Talk:José Abueva

message: I stumbled upon this by clicking "random article".  It was interesting to learn about this man, but the article is very poorly written.
I counted 42 sentences in this article, not counting direct quotes.
12 sentences begin with his name.  19 begin with the word "He".  74% of the sentences either begin with his name or the word "He".  
I realize that whoever wrote this does not speak English as a first language, but it is written on a 3rd grade level.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Van Vidrine (talk • contribs) 15:34, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly written 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 16:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Rui Yoshida

message: can we create a "Yoshida Family Artists" category, that would cover sub-pages: Rui Yoshida, Hiroshi Yoshida, Toshi Yoshida, Hodaka Yoshida, Kiso Yoshida, Fujio Yoshida, Chizuko Yoshida, Ayomi Yoshida? Mitakadai 01:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: How
Talk:Remah Synagogue

message: As far as i know, Tempel Synagogue (the reformed synagogue) is the other functioning synagogue in Krakow (see Polish :pl:Czynne synagogi w Polsce) though with no regular religious services. Slawojarek 10:34, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was in Krakow last week and could not visit the Izaak synagogue because a bar-mitzvah was taking place. So there are at least 3.--84.226.53.181 (talk) 16:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We should verify this fact. Maybe it is the only one which holds services on a daily basis? Chesdovi (talk) 17:54, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Only functioning synagogue?

message: Israel ben Josef was prodded due to lack of notability other than synagogue. I deprodded it and suggested this merge. Lembit Staan (talk) 20:14, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest that the fac that he founded the synagogue be merged into Remah Synagogue, as proposed, but the information in the "Legend" section should be merged into the Moses Isserles article. Debresser (talk) 19:59, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , Isn't this an encyclopedic and lengthy bio about him? If so it would like suffice to make him notable. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:24, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I don't really care about the person. There are 3 times more rabbis in Wikipedia that synagogues. (I am wondering whether we have to write an article for every Polish bishop as well, but I am agnostic, so don't care to deal with them.) My nomination was as merely a formal way to remove the  without engaging into notability discussions. Lembit Staan (talk) 19:48, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , Right, I'd rather see this merged then deleted too. Ping User:Whiteguru who PRODed it in the first place. And who else is interested in historical Polish-Jewish topics... sigh. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

text: Oppose merge proposal; references suggest that he was a well-recognized author, giving him independent notability. Klbrain (talk) 21:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given that this objection has been uncontested for over 6 months. Klbrain (talk) 08:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Israel ben Josef]]