lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:History of professional baseball in Milwaukee

message: I think it's time to consider renaming or splitting this article. The addition of the pre-1902 timeline pushes it over the edge for me: it's really not about the current club any longer, but about the "History of Milwaukee Baseball".  Should it be renamed?  Or the non-current-Milwaukee Brewer stuff be separated into its own article, titled along those lines?  Thoughts?  SixFourThree (talk) 18:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be renamed as you suggest. The opening sentence explains that it's about Milwaukee professional baseball in general, not just the current club. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 22:46, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is, I believe, a relatively new addition.  The title was somewhat suspect when it branched the two unrelated clubs named "Milwaukee Brewers", but now it's full-fledged about the city's history as a whole.  The kicker is that I really think there should be a "History of the Milwaukee Brewers" article, so we can remove some of the overlap content from the main article, but this article is going too far afield.  Maybe I'll just create a new one for the history as a whole and move the relevant sections of this article there.  SixFourThree (talk) 14:04, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There has been baseball in Milwaukee off and on since 1878, or 130 years. The current club's history is about 40 years worth. The article could be split if you want a more definitive or focused history of just the current club. Then the "Baseball in Milwaukee" article could contain a brief mention of the current club plus a link to the detailed history. If you want to bother with all of that instead of leaving it in a single article. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 14:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

text: As written, I agree with the rename for the time being. I will be moving it shortly. -- Dolotta (talk) 22:07, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?
Talk:Theodosius the Cenobiarch

message: The opening sentence of this article states that Theodosius "was a founder and organizer of the cenobitic way of monastic life".  However, other articles credit St. Pachomius as being the "father of cenobitic monasticism," having established his first monastery more than a century before Theodosius was born.  Perhaps, then, the introduction to the article about Theodosius needs a bit of tweaking....
Hjcook (talk) 17:26, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Edited it a bit, but it still receives far too much space for a legend told in a form contradicted even by the dedicated Wiki art., where it's just a disciple of Th. who founded Qannoubine Monastery. And even that is highly unlikely, too. And here it's UNSOURCED! Arminden (talk) 09:25, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maronite legend: unsourced & inaccurate
Talk:1995 SEA Games

message: {{subst:image source|Image:18th sea games.png)) Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:1989 SEA Games

message: {{subst:image source|Image:15th sea games mascots.png)) Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:1985 SEA Games

message: {{subst:image source|Image:13th sea games mascot.png)) Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sandy Pearce

message: Added categories and merged in the duplicate article on "Sid" Pearce. He's indeed a true legend but what is this bit in the Frank Burge quote about "He also pulled a fishing skiff from Double Bay to Redhead on the South Coast, about 140 miles" . What on earth does that mean ? Did he drag it over the ground ? Or did he row it or sail it ? -Sticks66 13:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still confused when I read this. Presumably "pulled" means he "rowed" the skiff ?? -Sticks66 16:53, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pulled a skiff
Talk:George Treweek

message: Seems a bit hokey to me. If every one else in his family was called Treweek and he was the only one who changed it to Treweeke then perhaps that explains why he didn't make a fuss about it. Rather than this implication that he was a modest soul, "who graciously accepted " the incorrect spelling and "didn't have the heart to tell the press they had the name wrong".-Sticks66 13:13, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: "He retired quietly at the end of 1934" . What does that mean ? That he didn't do a lap of honour and wave goodbye at his last home game ?  -Sticks66 13:13, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling section 
Talk:The Way I Feel (12 Stones song)

message: :Image:12 stones the way i feel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:12 stones the way i feel.jpg

message: I saw the music vid at metacafe. It was nicely done. Very pessimistic and depressed though. I wonder why I never heard of the band before I watched that musicvideo. If they're a Christian band why don't they mention God? They barely allude to him. Should the link to the video be added?
--69.234.208.222 18:49, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I saw the music vid
Talk:Minority influence

message: Users hcokim & dhwong will be undertaking the improvement of this stub. A detailed outline and plan for these improvements are to come shortly, but the key focus of our changes will be to inject appropriate amounts of supporting evidence, research, and information.
==== Updated Structure for Article ====
* What is minority influence (Introduction)
* Studies on Minority Influence
* Factors that influence minority influence
** Size
** Behavioral Style
** Situational Factors
** Informational Social Influence
* Effects of Minority Influence
** Yielding
** Broadened Views
* Examples of Minority Influence
** 12 Angry Men
** Adolf Hitler in World War 2
* Further Research
* Sources
==== Sources ====
* Serge Moscovici - 1985, 1994
* Moscovici & Nemeth 1974
* Wendy Wood, Lundgren, Ouellette, Busceme, Blackstone 1994
* De Dreu, De Vries 2001, Levine Moreland and Choi
* Social Psychology Textbook - Aronson, 6th edition
We've already started inputting some of the sources into the actual article.
This project will be completed under the supervision and guidance of Carnegie Mellon professor Robertekraut to ensure its quality. -- Hcokim (talk) 00:56, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Restructuring & Improvement 

message: * Serge Moscovici - 1985, 1994
* Moscovici & Nemeth 1974
* Wendy Wood, Lundgren, Ouellette, Busceme, Blackstone 1994
* De Dreu, De Vries 2001, Levine Moreland and Choi
* Social Psychology Textbook - Aronson, 6th edition
We've already started inputting some of the sources into the actual article.
This project will be completed under the supervision and guidance of Carnegie Mellon professor Robertekraut to ensure its quality. -- Hcokim (talk) 00:56, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Superman punch

message: Fence Push-off - A Superman Punch initiated with the use of an opposite foot push from the fence, prior to the arm strike.  This technique has been demonstrated successfully by many top level MMA strikers including Carlos Condit.SquashEngineer (talk) 15:02, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source for that? —swpbT 17:25, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variations
Talk:The Visitors (song)

message: :Image:1142.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:1142.jpg

message: Isn't this song about a fear of ghosts/the paranormal?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.37.133 (talk) 10:58, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning
Talk:P.O.D. discography

message: {{subst:image source|Image:1137893972 POD Testify.jpg)) Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:58, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Single just released and needs to be added. Deferring to experts to handle this update. Rossidor (talk) 22:38, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Drop” with Randy Blythe
Talk:Steve Penk

message: This article needs some major cleanup —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.151.126 (talk • contribs) 
:Undoubtably the Worst DJ ever 88.109.66.138 (talk) 10:56, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Anon is sort of right, but we don't do oppinon, we do fact Randomtime (talk) 12:39, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

text: What are you on about? there is no reason for this article to be deleted. Steve Penk was a very popular and entertaining DJ to many, he became a household name in the UK (mainly in south east I would say), and his famous prank calls were enjoyed by many. This article should be improved, but certainly not deleted! If anything it should be marked as a stub and added to. For example I know Steve attended medical school when he was younger but dropped before completing the course (I don’t have a cite and dont plan to find one so I wont add that to the article but there is much more info that could be added) Also more dates etc would be nice for the earlier part… --JCW 23:47, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Studio e.go!

message: Studio e.go! is the proper spelling and capitalization of the company's name.  See the company's official website, as well as the Chinese and Japanese wikipedia's article titles. -Afker 01:07, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: I've now seen  revert my addition of the anime wikiproject banner twice so let me make it perfectly clear: The visual novel task force is a shared task force of WP:VG and WP:ANIME. I quoted WP:WikiProject Anime and manga#What topics we cover in both edit summaries where I readded the banner but I'll quote it here once more: 
If the members of WP:ANIME don't agree with their own project page, then the proper forum to propose changes is at WP:ANIME, not here.-- Brainy J ~✿~ (talk) 00:51, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Task force/Wikiproject tagging
Talk:Family of Jogaila

message: :Image:100zl r.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 01:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:100zl r.jpg
Talk:List of diplomatic missions of Sudan

message: There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations#Formatting_of_diplomatic_missions_lists - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:03, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article
Talk:Sudan Airways

message: *
*
*
*
*
*
--Jetstreamer  22:25, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived references not used in the article 

message: I've reverted the edits made by  twice (, ). The airline has been banned by the EU since , so the lead is correct. Please discuss any disagreements here. Thanks.--Jetstreamer  02:17, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  EU ban
Talk:Motorola RAZR 2

message: I renamed it to Motorola Razr2  I Made it much easier to find the article as the standard computer keyboard does not feature the "squared" character.) I suggest it to be kept that way.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris-Gonzales (talk • contribs) 06:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New page name 

message: According to the Motorola website, the RAZR2 Please know that the product is not Razr squard, its razr2 V8 has 2.5G, not 3G as the article states. 90.196.167.234 10:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  3G? 

message: So according the infobox this Razr bigger than the older Razr V3?!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skatewalk (talk • contribs) 04:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Measurements?

message: We need in-line citations ... --Kushalt 23:20, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-line citations 

message: This article needs pictures...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.127.223.79 (talk) 04:47, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pix or it didn't happen 

message: Since when did the V9 come with a MicroSD slot?
The RAZR2 does not come with a slot at all.
--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 14:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The card is held in place with a small plastic tab. JonnyH (talk) 11:04, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  memory 

message: I know this for a fact. My personal genuine MotoRAZR2 V9 phone has a 32GB SD-HC card in it and works perfectly.
The Motorola website (with the most genuine information about this phone), Motorola.com says specifically that this phone supports up to 32GB. Any source which says any lower is either written without knowledge about this phone's capabilities, or it simply may have been read off the V9's User Manual (which was published in 2007, the release date of the phone, when proper testing with 32GB cards had not been carried out). The manual claims it's up to 4GB, but that was only because 4GB was the maximum amount of storage that was released back in 2007 for MicroSD-HC cards. Different third-party websites claim compatible storages from 8GB through 16GB as they came out. The increasing storages up to 32GB that have come out are perfectly compatible with the V9 and V9x, and possibly with the V9m.
Source: http://www.motorola.com/Consumers/AU-EN/Consumer-Products-and-Services/Mobile-Phones/ci.MOTORAZR2-V9x-AU-EN.alt
I know this source is right because I use a 32GB card in my V9 and works fine. Even if another country's Motorola website claims a lower capacity, it simply hasn't been updated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.43.230.196 (talk) 15:03, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The RAZR2 V9 supports up to 32GB MicroSD-HC Memory
Talk:Azza Air Transport

message: ==Untitled==
There is a company out there that's doing business under the name of AZZ Inc, see . It is listed on NYSE under AZZ, so I wonder if it doesn't deserve at least a mention of its existence under the AZZ lemma which is redirecting here? I mean, it's not big and probably doesn't merit a full-blown article, but does Azza Transport with its 4 airplanes do? --208.114.63.4 (talk) 12:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: What about AZZ Inc. (NYSE: AZZ)?

message: There is a company out there that's doing business under the name of AZZ Inc, see . It is listed on NYSE under AZZ, so I wonder if it doesn't deserve at least a mention of its existence under the AZZ lemma which is redirecting here? I mean, it's not big and probably doesn't merit a full-blown article, but does Azza Transport with its 4 airplanes do? --208.114.63.4 (talk) 12:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Badr Airlines

message: User:NA88 added this to the article, I'm moving it here. Whether the allegations or true are not, they belong in the article because it is certainly worth noting that the company has been been banned by the UN. If Badr deny the claims, or if other organizations have disputed them publicly, then that can be added too with sources. Recury (talk) 20:31, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Arms Trafficking Allegations
Talk:Hasta Siempre, Comandante

message: I think the second verse is missing. Something like :
Tu mano gloriosa y fuerte 
Sobre la historia dispara 
Cuando todo Santa Clara 
Se despierta para verte.
I'm about to modify it...
And the text might need a check from a spanish-speaking person. I think there's a bunch of accents to add...
Noirdesirs (talk) 01:37, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've read it through and don't see any need for accents, every word has stress in the position indicated by absence of accents on the word.  Michealt (talk) 16:39, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  One verse missing in "Spanich lyrics" 

message: The introduction used to say "glorifying Che Guevara and his role as a revolutionary commander". I have changed the word glorifying to simply describing. Glorifying is a loaded word, implying that the positive picture of Guevara in the song is unjustified. (Cf. the second OED definition: "describe or represent as admirable, especially unjustifiably").  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.52.122.213 (talk) 18:32, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glorifying Che Guevara 

message: The link seems unjustified. Is that mount also called "historical" or is it implied that they look from this specific mountain ? 69.17.225.249 (talk) 04:57, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  why "historical heights" links to Sierra Maestra?
Talk:Carrol Chandler

message: This article currently has just one stated source, the official U.S. military bio for Carrol H. Chandler. I see at least problems: 1.) the official U.S. military bios are slanted, in that they do not convey information that would reflect poorly on the military (compare the official bio of Frank Kelso, involved in the Tailhook scandal, vs. a better written wikipedia article on him using several other sources), and 2.) the article does not show which material is copied. Copied material should be in quotes (quotation marks or set in block quote formatting), to separate from wikipedia editor wording.  See WP:REF Hence I mark this article with the "refimprove" and related tags. doncram (talk) 02:50, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ref improvements needed
Talk:Headnote

message: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. This belongs, IMO, on Wiktionary. - Jeeny Talk 02:01, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed Tay's ear (talk) 19:43, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

text: No; see recent discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Headnote. TJRC (talk) 21:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dictionary 

message: I removed references to headnotes authored by the court and the example from Roe v. Wade. Headnotes are written by editors at legal publishers, and the example given as a headnote authored by the Supreme Court in Roe v. Wade was a headnote written by a Lexis editor and published in the United States Supreme Court Reports, Lawyer's Edition. Further cleanup is undoubtedly necessary. Polytheme (talk) 05:50, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits/Call for Expert
Talk:Molecular graphics

message: The commonest isosurfaces are the Connolly surface, or the volume within which a given proportion of the electron density lies.
A Connolly surface ("molecular surface", or "solvent-excluded surface") is based on a spherical probe's reach into a group of atoms, with each atom defined by vdW radii.  This is not the same thing as a level set of electron density.  It's a kind of approximation, sure, but not one in which tweaking of parameters (probe radius, vdW radii) would result in convergence on any actual isosurface.
Wait, I take that back.  If you define your electron density as a specific, distinct value at the surfaces described by vdW radii, but also distinct from the surface portions within other atoms, (thus basically designating a CPK surface as a distinct, contiguous, single-value set) then a probe radius of zero would get you that isosurface.  In short, that's silly.
The Connolly surface, if I understand correctly, even excludes cavities.  You just can't stick your probe in there, my friend.  But my real issue here is that the surface of the probe is not delineating a level set, it's specifically defining something else — solvent exclusion.
We might say "The commonest isosurface is a very rough and unintentional approximation of one, called the Connolly surface, representing electron density" if we actually want to consider the Connolly surface to be an isosurface.
—63.249.110.34 (talk) 09:59, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Alrighty, see if that looks any better.  —Raymond Keller (talk) 07:31, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Connolly Surface ≠ Isosurface

message: It is surprising (and somewhat disappointing) that this article has been around as long as it has, and has reached the depth that it has, on the strength of only two references.  There are whole sections that are based, as far as I can tell, on original research or personal experience. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:50, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refimprove 

message: It says, "The isosurface in Fig. 5 appears to show the electrostatic potential," but there is no Fig. 5. Verdana♥Bold 08:11, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  somebody screwed up 

message: Does that mean it isn't a science? It can't be both a philosophy and a science as they are antithetical. It should be classed under pseudoscience in that case. Calling it the art of graphical representation of molecules would be one solution. --ෆාට් බුබුල (talk) 08:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Philosophy?