lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1868

message: "Queen Isabella II of Spain derrocated": what is meant? (there doesn't seem to be a word "derrocated").
S.
: I can't believe someone asked this in Febuary 2003 and no one who has touched the page since addressed the matter. She was deposed by a liberal revolution. -- Jmabel | Talk 21:01, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
I have made some year layout proposals which would not affect this page (this page is conform) on my talk page. If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 19:01, 6 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: 141.217.172.8 (talk) 18:14, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Saucy[talk – contribs] 03:14, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 June 2019 

message: Please add this event to the list of days in 1868.
On this day (23 June 2020) in 1868, American inventor Christopher Latham Sholes (along with Carlos Glidden and Samuel W. Soulé) was granted the first typewriter patent ahead of other competing inventors in the same field. Monsoonlei (talk) 12:21, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Dawnseeker2000 12:22, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 June 2020 

message: In the May 31 entry, "Thomas Spence declares himself president of Manitobah", the Thomas Spence link goes to the wrong person.   It should point to a (nonexistent) page for the Thomas Spence mentioned on the Republic of Manitobah page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_Manitobah 24.78.190.118 (talk) 00:49, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas Spence 

message: Why is nicholas II of russia listed under the may 6th birthdays if by modern standards his birthday was may 18? 142.127.176.100 (talk) 03:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  nicholas II of russia
Talk:Lime kiln

message: The traditional process of burning lime would leave a lot of wood ash mixed in with the lime, but its presence is ignored in the discussion.  Is this ash a contaminant?  Is its presence negligible?
:Although wood is, indeed, added to a lime kiln or limepit, the limestone is usually of a coarser consistency, sometimes even chunks or blocks of limestone are used. The wood ash is removed from the kiln, and the limestone chunks/blocks are also removed and only then crushed.Davidbena (talk) 03:30, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Wood Ash

message: This article is very focused on lime kilns in the UK/Europe, and does not provide any historical references to the many lime kilns in the United States or other countries around the world.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thefox226G (talk • contribs) 20:38, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Broken down "Early kilns" to add geographic specific subsections. I also organised the photos into galleries as they were all over the place. Feel free to add sections for other countries or to expand poor lonely Belgium there. Citizen D (talk) 01:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK Focus 

message: Add to references: https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/wa/a/30494628/family-keep-old-lime-ways-burning/
Which is a currently working commercial old kiln.
Oaec 60.230.194.64 (talk) 22:55, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old lime kilns 

message: "If the heat supplied to form the lime (3.75 MJ/kg in an efficient kiln) is obtained by burning fossil fuel it will release CO2: in the case of coal fuel 295 kg/t; in the case of natural gas fuel 206 kg/t. The electric power consumption of an efficient plant is around 20 kWh per tonne of lime. This additional input is the equivalent of around 20 kg CO2 per ton if the electricity is coal-generated."
Obviously this is wrong: turning coal into electricity into heat is not more efficient than turning coal directly into heat.
Using the value of 0.9 Joules / (grams*degC) as the heat capacity of CaCO3, I calculate that heating one tonne of CaCO3 to 1000 degC requires 250kWh, not 20kWh. 2601:98A:4400:2E50:F563:2062:9BAD:7358 (talk) 20:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Math error in section "CO2 Emissions"
Talk:Urethral sphincter

message: Considerable confusion exists regarding the presence of (or rather absence)internal urethral sphincter in females. Some referrence would be helpful.
Najbhusan (talk) 14:41, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: I have heard that men have a sufficiently strong urethral sphincter that they can die from a burst bladder if they try to keep it in too long, whereas women will instead leak if they hold it too long. I have no idea if this is true, but if anyone knows a source that could verify/deny this, it would be worth putting into the article properly. -- Whitepaw (talk) 19:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strength of the muscle in men vs. women 

message: I just modified the article making many revisions. I corrected some mistakes, added more information, clarifications, and removal of the wrong information that was added regarding male/female bladder capacity from someone saying:
"Human males have much stronger sphincter muscles than females, meaning that they can retain a large amount of urine for twice as long, as much as 800mL, i.e. "hold it"."  ..... The style is too informal to sound like an encyclopedia, not counting the misinformation and unneutral statement.
I also removed the disputed neutrality as I believe it is no longer necessary in my revision. Let me know if someone disagrees. Dr.Kane (talk) 01:28, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamped the article 

message: The Gender Differences section lacks any sort of organization, has confusing adverbs, and at times seems contradictory. 75.118.170.35 (talk) 20:44, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Organization
Talk:Index of economics articles

message: A related topic, Grameen Bank, has been nominated on Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive. Contribute your expertise and vote for Grameen Bank on Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive!--Fenice 06:47, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement drive

message: what is this? is it the opposite of progressive tax? i cant find comprhensive tax on wiki. i've also noticed that your list does not include Progressive tax. --Jaysscholar 07:23, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  comprehensive tax 

message: surprisingly this doesnt even exist  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rickibal (talk • contribs) 17:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Micro policy analysis 

message: There's a discussion on what the reference requirements for lists like this one.  The Transhumanist (talk) 01:28, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia talk:Verifiability#Should there be an exception for indexes?]] 

message: I'm putting together a new WikiProject and I saw that some projects have a consolidated Index of articles (a useful thing) but I could not find a tool or a template to do that very basic job. I have a doubt here: please do not tell me that Wikipedia would be crazy enough to create and maintain those indexes by hand because I won't believe you... --Alainr345 (talk) 21:48, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Index creation 

message: move them Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Index of statistics articles → List of statistics articles — Most lists are called "List of -".  There are probably other pages that start with "Index of -".  This is to standardize articles and naming. 174.3.98.236 (talk) 11:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Index of economics articles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Index of conservation articles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Index of statistics articles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:45, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Index of international trade articles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 11:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Deadly force

message: I have removed the seven condition of deadly force as related to the militarys use. These justifications are applied to military personnel only and might confuse the general definition of deadly force. I left the Armed forces definition intact as it is the easiest legal definition to understand.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.197.178.48 (talk) 05:10, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In reality I think it's probably better to rename the article to something like "Lethal force (in US law)", because the subject is not lethal force per se, but how the phrase "legal force" is described and used in various legal contexts in the US. Snori (talk) 07:20, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Template:Globalize
Talk:List of ski areas and resorts

message: There is no mention of Vail, Karuizawa, or Burlington in this or the main skiing article.  That is like creating a suite of surfing articles without mentioning California or Oahu. --McTrixie 16:44, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centers of Ski Culture 

message: Is there any interest in starting a list which has external links to trail maps for ski resorts? Or does such a thing already exist on the wikipedia? Or what would people think of adding it to this list? Reason I ask is that when working out where to go for a ski holiday, I really like to see the trail map to get a sense of scale, and layout. A big list that contained direct links to this information would be very handy (for me, and presumably for others too). -- All the best, Nickj (t) 04:34, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds uninteresting to me and probably non-encyclopedic. Do not add it to this list because it would clutter it ...maelgwntalk 09:42, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fair enough, consider it dropped. -- All the best, Nickj (t) 05:48, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: check out google earth; you can get a pretty good sense of a ski area that way.--Baoluo 09:29, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would probably be helpful to add direct links to the relevant trail maps in the articles. A "list of trail maps" per se would get deleted by someone. Stevage 06:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of trail maps 

message: I decided to go ahead and do the rename to List of ski areas and resorts, along with the split.  All areas except Africa (which has too few ski areas to need its own list) are now split into separate list articles:
*List of ski areas and resorts in Asia
*List of ski areas and resorts in Australia
*List of ski areas and resorts in New Zealand  (previously split and transcluded by Stevage in January 2007)
*List of ski areas and resorts in Europe (may also benefit from a further split later)
*List of ski areas and resorts in Canada
*List of ski areas and resorts in the United States
*List of ski areas and resorts in South America
This looks like a major improvement in readability, usability, and maintainability to me.  I hope that others agree.  Thanks.  --Seattle Skier (See talk tierS) 01:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renamed and split
Talk:Spanish Inquisition

message: The Inquisition affected Moriscos (converted Muslim people) as well as the Jewish people, so why is this solely in a Wikipedia series on Antisemetism? Should it not also be part of the series on Islamophobia in that case? 2A02:C7F:228D:8800:B9E2:7672:BBB3:7C2 (talk) 01:05, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification as antisemetism
Talk:Zhou Dynasty (690–705)

message: The table is a bit confusing, because during 684AD - 690AD it was still Tang Dynasty, but the title of the table is Zhou Dynasty (690AD - 705AD). Should the Tang Dynasty part of the table be removed OR go back to the original version which the table is seperated into Tang and Zhou?
I prefer removing the Tang part. After all this article is about Zhou Dynasty, and the story of the reign of Wu Zetian should be discussed in her article. --Lorenzarius 07:53 Feb 3, 2003 (UTC)
The page just needs more clarifications. During 684-690, it was still Tang dynasty but Wu Zetian was the empress. She did not vocally abolish the Tang dynasty until defeating opposing parties. - User:kt2
I don't think one person dynasties should get separate articles. Instead, they should be limited to whoever started it. (See Yuan Shikai). Then we can have only one Zhou Dynasty article with a disambiguation note at the very botton. --Jiang 07:47, 30 Jul 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree completely. --Lorenzarius 11:20, 30 Jul 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Manchu people

message: The link for this word/term takes the user to the Wikipedia page for Manchu transliteration, but "Abkai" is not mentioned on this page whatsoever. Either the link needs to be corrected or a section on "Abkai" needs to be added to the linked page. 
I assume "Abkai" is a method of transliterating or romanizing the Manchu language, but it may also be a separate language or dialect itself. Without a proper link, or in-article explanation, I can't be sure either way. 66.91.36.8 (talk) 02:51, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abkai 

message: There is too much talk about sex and slavery in this page and resembles other han chinese user vandalism in other parts of wikipedia. Please editors remove inappropriate content focused on the sexual nature of these people which has a pro-chinese chauvanist bias and is racist in nature. Sumaiyahle (talk) 19:11, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism
Talk:Black bloc

message: How is it that Richard Spencer is not mentioned anywhere in the Black Bloc article? Spencer getting punched was surely a huge part of the whole antifa/black bloc uprising in America. Does anyone really debate this??? Even the antifa wiki article mentions it, and its not half as clear that the person who punched Spencer was antifa as it is that they were black bloc. Mbsyl (talk) 15:18, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Spencer 

message: The word in English for a group of persons is "block". "Bloc" is generally reserved for a group of countries. See the two words at Lexico.com (the online Oxford dictionary) for example. Wegesrand (talk) 12:49, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Terminology in Wikipedia articles is based on what's used in reliable sources. Reliable sources on this subject almost exclusively use "bloc". – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:32, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Google ngrams seems to agree. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 22:00, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  block, not bloc 

message: I came across this article while looking at sources for the Sean Bonney article; it has some meditations on the black bloc tactic in relation to poetry that could make for an interesting addition to this article:
* 
– Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black bloc prosody 

message: I've removed the following as OR/Syn:
----
There is no evidence that the black bloc tactic is particularly vulnerable to infiltration, however, as investigatory—and even agent provocateur—activity has taken place regularly among completely nonviolent, non-"black bloc" campaigns. In 2003, the Oakland, California Police Department infiltrated a group of demonstrators protesting police brutality and the war in Iraq at the port; subpoenaed private comments by Captain Howard Jordan indicate that his plan was to steer the march away from the police station in order to avoid confrontation. In internal documents, Jordan mentioned this strategy was common in other police departments, including San Francisco and Seattle."State of Surveillance: Government Monitoring of Political Activity in Northern & Central California A Report by the ACLU of Northern California"  Written by Mark Schlosberg, Police Practices Policy Director, July 2006; 
----
All the best: Rich Farmbrough 21:58, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:OR]]
Talk:ISO 3166

message: The convention wrt. using "tt" around the codes makes the tables look much neater, aligning the columns. The other alternative would be to use HTML tables, but they are really a pain to read/maintain as wiki-source. User:Egil 09:47 Feb 3, 2003 (UTC)
:It would be nice to have the current two-letter codes together with the numeric codes (or 3-letter alpha codes) in the same table/list --- User:Docu — Preceding undated comment added 11:41, 21 April 2003
::What about moving some content to ISO 3166-1? Because the country codes are not ISO 3166 but, ISO 3166-1. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.235.5.222 (talk) 05:59, 6 May 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: what about combining http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1 with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_capitals_in_native_languages
or adding native country names to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1 ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zyron (talk • contribs) 13:01, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  an additional list 

message: Dear Tangerines, Thank you for explaining the change to my contribution. I do have a question though, I'm hoping you can answer for me - the link I provided is to a publicly available database, a majority of the information is free to the public and relevant to the Wikipedia topic, so does it not qualify as appropriate subject matter to be included? Also I see another entry along similar lines just above my entry, which continues to remain in the topic. Thank you for taking the time to educate me on this. Regards, Mkwk567 (talk) 15:57, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Appropriate subject matter?

message: * http://www.iso.org/iso/search.htm?qt=3166&published=on&active_tab=standards
* http://www.iso.org/iso/search.htm?qt=ISO+3166&published=on&active_tab=standards
--222.67.207.250 (talk) 03:22, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Look at the search results for the topic..... 

message: what about explaining the uses and purposes of granting a ISO 3166 code? from the outside it seems a completely superfluous activity. 192.87.141.135 (talk) 11:14, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: More info can be found in ISO 3166-1. Chanheigeorge (talk) 17:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Some examples of what they're used for, e.g. postage destinations, might be a good idea. Someone looking at this who doesn't know will probably be a bit baffled. Marcus Rowland (talk) 22:06, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  purpose 

message: How did Iceland get "is" and not "ic"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robinrobin (talk • contribs) 18:39, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Iceland is ISLAND in Icelandic. - JohnnyWiki (talk) 15:06, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Iceland

message: There is an ongoing dicussion at User talk:LiliCharlie#ISO 3166-1 and Taiwan about disputes concerning ISO 3166 codes relating to Taiwan, especially disputes over the name for Taiwan and the way it is subdivided: TW-KIN and TW-LIE are not the PRC's taste, and CN-TW not to that of the ROC. Everyone is invited to join that discussion. Love —LiliCharlie (talk) 13:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  TW, TW-KIN, TW-LIE, and CN-TW
Talk:Light-second

message: This is a dictionary definition. It should not be an encyclopedia article. It can be defined along with related units of measure in the speed of light article.
-Eric talk 12:06, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've merged most of the shorter "light-time" units in here, because the light-second is the one which is actually used in several scientific contexts. Physchim62 (talk) 11:14, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. Eric talk 14:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dictionary entry

message: Light-minute distance from the Earth to the Mars is between around 4 minutes to 24 minutes. 
http://blogs.esa.int/mex/2012/08/05/time-delay-between-mars-and-earth/
ESA = European Space Agency.
--ee1518 (talk) 15:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mars - Earth distance in light-minutes =  4 - 24 minutes.
Talk:Rudolf Steiner

message: His first marriage ended in divorce in June 1904, according to Dutch Wikipedia, citing (Lindenberg 2011:356; Zander 2007:241).
The only thing that is doubtful is separation (without divorce) vs. divorce. My German is not good enough for such nuances. E.g. religious Dutchies get formally separated instead of divorcing, since their religion does not allow them to divorce.
Reason? His second wife moved in his home, while he was married to his first wife. tgeorgescu (talk)  01:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  First marriage 

message: In respect to the claims about Steiner's Docetism, Adoptionism, Nestorianism, and Gnosticism: I don't believe in the univocality of the Bible, why I would believe in the univocality of mainstream WP:SCHOLARSHIP? tgeorgescu (talk)  16:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Univocality
Talk:Transfusion medicine

message: Does this merit an article of its own? KJ
I don't think so.  I don't even think the field exists.  I suggest deletion after June 2004 if no one can say it exists.  Kd4ttc 19:13, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the topic does merit an article of its own. I was a blood banker (medical technologist) for over a decade, and I can tell you that, yes, transfusion medicine does exist as a medical specialty. These physicians can be crucial in the treatment of patients who suffer transfusion reactions or need more specialized blood products than are routinely used at many hospitals. When I have time, I'll try to get some more information into this article. --MEGaMark 02:12, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Terrance and Phillip

message: In my opinion Terrance and Phillip were introduced to the South Park universe when big debates were on in real life about South Park being a production that is just about fart jokes and foul language. Terrance and Phillip serve as an reflection on South Park itself, carrying reproaches to an extreme. Also, TP's animations are even worse than that of South Park. 
I would be nice if someone comments on my claim and adds it to the article in case of it is true. 
Thanks, --Abdull 16:26, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons for introducing Terrance and Phillip 

message: ""Here" and "There" are sometimes changed to "Heeya" and "Theya"." Never in my travels aboot the nation have I heard a Canadian Say that. That is a feature of the Bristish accent. It is actually more prevalent in  Sothern Americans. (not south americans) 
...also cox. . .
*In reply to your message above, Canadians on South Park are always saying "aboot". Watch the movie South Park: Bigger, Longer and Uncut to see.
**Mr. Garrison 15:39, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: O rly?

message: Is it correct that Terrance was born as Terrence Henry Stoot, as the article currently says. Is the change in spelling of Terrance a typo? There are no sources so I can't check myself. Hobson 01:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As nobody seems to be able to confirm the information was correct, and it seems unlikely to me, and there were no references that could have confirmed it, I have removed it. Hobson 10:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of Terrance

message: My friend told me that the reason Terrance and Philip look the way they do is because that's how Canadian cartoons look. Can someone confirm this? If so, which cartoon is it? ForestAngel (talk) 16:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How they look