Talk:Chocolate-covered raisin

message: Hmm... nothing like looking around the room for objects to look up on Wikipedia. -chaosemerald
ya rly
:Why on earth does "Raisinets" redirect here!? I was looking for information on the specific brand, not a stub about chocolate-covered raisins in general. The specific spelling "Raisinets" additionally is a trademark. Redirecting it here is as bad as redirecting kleenex to facial tissue would be (and note that kleenex directs you to a page about the actual trademarked brand, with a note that: "This article is about the Kleenex brand. For information about the musical band of the same name, see Kleenex (band). For information about the generic item, see Facial tissue." Why was something like that not done here!?). 
ETA: By the way, the link to Raisinets leads right back here! ARGH! >.< How exactly does this kind of thing even happen?? Runa27 18:40, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps the edit (merging of "Chocolate covered raisins" and "Raisinets".) is a clue. There was nothing stopping you from editing the page and removing the brackets around "Raisinets" thereby eliminating the loop redirect. :) Electrawn 07:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

text: My gripe is the inaccuracy described in the shellac coating process. Having spent many years in candy manufacturing I have only ever seen a non modified ( ie an "original") Huon-Stuehrer nozzle used in the way described here. I admit that I have been retired for a number of years, so may be "out of the loop" with regard to current micro spraying methodology. Nonetheless, during several years in Europe in my early career I was fortunate enough to meet Herr Huon-Stuehrer. Apart from his natural teutonic charm, he was a very capable thinker and his original design was more than sufficient to achieve the purpose for which it was developed. I feel that very often modifications and alterations are there because of the notion of "change for the sake of change".  Bobby " The Dog" span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.20.227 (talk) 08:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

text: There is no such thing. --Lpd-Lbr (talk) 16:23, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

message: There is absolutely no way that I believe that Raisinets are the second largest selling candy in the United States. I put a sloppy citation needed tag on this 5 years ago, but it looks like this has never been addressed... and somehow random editors have made this go from third largest, to first, to second now. 
Based on this article from 2012  Raisinets doesn't crack the top 13 in the US in 2012. While things may have changed, I highly doubt this information. 
ChunyangD (talk) 06:08, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your removal of the claim. Meters (talk) 04:02, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third most popular candy? 

message: There is no such German prayer (and the "German" quote makes no sense). Since both it and the speculation about Meso-American origins have been added by the same account that did not do much else, and the "references" to both "factoids" where added later by another limited-use account, I think it is very likely that the whole section is fabricated. --Peter Putzer (talk) 13:30, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fake history removed