Talk:Sticky keys

message: Under Windows this options is actually called "StickyKeys" without any space in bewteen....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.31.11.24 (talk) 13:18, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct writing

message: This article contradicts itself, saying both there is no way to turn it off after giving directions on how to turn it off. I tried. It is quite easy to turn it off. I wonder if it becomes harder when one does not make a valid attempt? Kyujuni (talk) 09:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradictory article

message: I read this article, but was sure I recalled seeing the sticky keys feature in a version of the Mac OS prior to Windows 95. I've done some digging and turned up an old Apple article which suggests that a system update present on Macs from 1994 provided an update to this feature: "Updates the Easy Access Control Panel to version 7.2, fixing a wake up problem on PowerBooks. It now remembers whether sticky keys, mouse keys, and slow keys were on or off between restarts." This suggests the sticky keys functionality was available prior to this update. Gaspodog (talk) 01:35, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, I found no references to a similar feature in prior versions of Windows, so I'll change the article accordingly. Thanks for your details! --Poc (talk) 08:58, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

text: The reference to that System 6 manual dropped out of the article somehow. I added it back in. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 23:38, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Mac OS and Easy Access

message: The article implies that the only reasons people use Sticky Keys, is due to disabilities and other complaints. However, some people, like me, think that they are superior and that the only reason not everyone has switched to it yet, is because people don't think about it. I feel offended by this article's tone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.71.110.7 (talk) 12:15, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: While StickyKeys may be used for accessibility, there are applications which use Key-Chaining (MSVC and EMacs for example).
This is quite a different use-case, instead of using this for accessability, a key-shortcut can be defined that takes a series of key-strokes which can't be accessed in any other way.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.123.225 (talk) 09:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New page could be added for Key-Chaining / Key-Chords 

message: The sections ends with "This feature can be misused in Windows by a hacker to backdoor into a system, but doing so requires physical access to the system." This claim is backed up by a citation to an article that explains why the exploit is useful, but stops before explaining how to use it and asks you to subscribe to their paid service to finish the article. Alyssa h (talk) 05:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues section might contain an advertisement 

message: I was asked on my talk page to respond here regarding a revert  I made. I had two concerns with the edit: (1) that xkbset was not a notable enough thing to be included; (2) given that the link had also been added to a similar page , the intention of the additions might be to promote something rather than to improve Wikipedia. Perhaps I'm wrong.   signed, Willondon (talk)  15:32, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent additions