Talk:Youth offending team

message: Reasons for assessment: Length, clarity, and photos are great. Issues that should be addressed before nominating it for GA status:
*a lot of the bullets should be done away with and restructured in prose form.
*more references/citations could probably be found besides the official YOT websit to minimize any chances or perceptions of POV problems
*external links should link somewhere and be separated from references
*some minor technical errors in writing - needs to be copyedited
*disclaimer at the bottom seems excessive, since the content of the article is not suggesting a remedy to a legal/criminal justice problem
*possibly the article could be shortened to be more concise, but only if that can be done without sacrificing comprehensiveness, which IMO is one of the strengths of the article. 
*could use some more wikification
Bobanny 22:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

message: As of  (the article during this review), I speedy failed this article for Good Article status. It's a good start, but per WP:WIAGA, the article does not use inline citations, lead is too short, stubby sections and one is "listy". Please see other GA articles for better comparison. When this article is ready, you can nominate it again. As always, when editors disagree with my reviews, you can always submit this article to WP:GA/R. — Indon (reply) — 12:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA failed 

message: This article passed the GA nomination, it is now a Good Artilce after meeting the Good Article Criteria and the WP:LE review and has been improved by the author, lets hope it can be FA status next! Dep. Garcia  ( Talk | Help Desk | Complaints )  12:16, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Passed 

message: In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. Unfortunately, as of 
September 21, 
2007, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAC. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GA/R. 
Ruslik 13:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Review &mdash; delisted 

message: SJB (talk) 09:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resumed for discussion on Referral Orders Best Practice & A_Z Jargon Buster 

message: I assume it was written by a Somerset student as a project or something, but whatever the reason it's simply not good enough to represent the work undertaken by YOTs.  How can we expect service users, sentencers and partner services to take us seriously as a profession if we offer this level of misinformation?   
Unfortunately I haven't the time or wiki-skills to rewrite it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.249.232.64 (talk) 18:35, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The whole article is tainted by inaccuracy and naivety 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Youth Offending Team. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061003081738/http://www.everychildmatters.gov.uk/youthjustice/yot/ to http://www.everychildmatters.gov.uk/youthjustice/yot/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified