lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Market in Honey Lane

message: It has long been rumoured that Anna Wing appeared in this show. I'm not sure if the actress ever said so, but this notion was at first questioned, but now seems accepted by all and sundry. If she did appear, it was not as a major long-running character - cast lists from TV Times of the broadcast years exist in my collection, and I cannot find her name anywhere in those I have (although my collection is not complete). Also, Market In Honey Lane had a similar setting to EastEnders, but not premise. The premise of EastEnders was to show life in 1980s Britain, and be gritty and topical. Market In Honey Lane is described by no less an authority than the British Film Institute thus:
This soap serial, in trying to demonstrate an earthy, natural society, succeeded somehow in showing how very nice, how indomitably life-loving, how British and human and working-class life is.
Inspired to some extent by Granada TV's success with Coronation Street (ITV, 1960-), ATV's Market in Honey Lane was a very conventional TV serial, setting up minor heartbreaks and conflicts so that the writers could dissolve them, usually, in a flood of cosy sentimentality.
The series, overall, is deeply embedded in a culture; that of the Cockney proletariat with its wide boys, stoical mothers and hermetic yet threatening cosiness. It was not an earth-shaking programme, and certainly not pioneering in any revolutionary ideas in technique and production, but simply proposed itself to the casual viewer as a mildly pleasant affair.
This is very far from the serial dreamt up by Julia Smith and Tony Holland in the 1980s.
(86.141.69.6 (talk) 02:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anna Wing - Not A Main Character And A Very Different Show From EastEnders.... 

message: I have been trying to find exactly what role and for what duration Anna Wing appeared in Market Honey Lane, and I now suspect she didn't or, if she did, in a brief and minor role. I can find no interviews - either printed or online - in which Miss Wing discussed this show, and suspect it all began as an online rumour which has been picked up by web surfing journalists from the likes of the Guardian, the Stage, etc. This type of parroted error is increasingly common. I have also checked she British Film Institute's cast list for the show, which includes guest appearances, and whilst several actors who would go on to fame did appear and the list seems to be pretty exhaustive for a 91 episode serial, Anna Wing's name or character is NOT THERE - http://www.screenonline.org.uk/tv/id/1400806/credits.html
(86.141.69.6 (talk) 10:27, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anna Wing - Did She Appear In Market In Honey Lane At ALL? 

message: In first para: "It was broadcast between April 1967 and March 1969. For the final two years, the name was shortened to just Honey Lane"
Errm... April 67 to March 69 is less than two years in total so "final two years" doesn't make much sense. What is it actually trying to say here? Bagunceiro (talk) 20:09, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final two years
Talk:Manor Croft Academy

message: Hello ... I honestly don't know what to do about this one, which seems to give Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day a Whole New Meaning ... my first thought was to take it to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard since it is an article about a school apparently written by one of the students, but I can't make a connection to justify the allegation.
*
*
The only edits to Earlsheaton Technology College have been made by Bumblebeeman92, except for my adding    tags.
Also, the sections Recent Inspector's comments and Pupil and Parent Comments are copied directly from the Comments section of http://www.earlsheatontc.org.uk/about/wider.htm (the copied material is mostly in purple, italic text), but the site is not copyrighted, so it's not a WP:CSD#G4.
I just thought that I should bring it to the attention of someone with more experience in this kind of thing than me, because it has obviously fallen under the radar. —72.75.100.232 12:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Earlsheaton Technology College]] 

message: I have just removed a remarkable amount of spam: lists of teachers, copies of the conduct and dress regulations, etc. Perhaps this is enough to save it from what otherwise would have been inevitable deletion. (I think most people would simply have said speedy deletion as advertising). DGG 21:15, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed spam
Talk:Garnock Way

message: The links for Gerard Slevin (who also has a minor role in Chariots of Fire) and Bill Henderson connect to other people with the same names. I will get round to fixing that another time.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.198.140.26 (talk) 16:38, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Descriptive complexity theory

message: Does anyone know how different modal logics can be used to describe complexity classes? Traversal of Kripke structures etc. I know the complexities of showing satisfiability in different modal logics; how does that relate to classes of languages expressible in those logics? --Spug (talk) 14:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modal logic 

message: The current coverage of descriptive complexity is quite unsatisfactory. We have what should be the parent article, Descriptive complexity theory, but which really is a stubby list of characterisations of complexity classes. Then we have three pages giving more detailed description of these characterisations, FO (complexity), SO (complexity) and HO (complexity). The main context is provided at FO (complexity) rather than here, and SO (complexity) and HO (complexity) make little sense without that context.
Most problematically, however, none of the descriptions adequately distinguish between the classes of structures on which a given characterisation holds. For instance, Fagin's theorem (ESO = NP) holds on all classes of finite structures, while the Immermann-Vardi Theorem (FO(LFP) = P) holds only for ordered structures, and Grädel's theorem (Second-order Horn logic = P) only holds in the presence of a successor relation.
In my opinion, a much better organisation would be to order the characterisations by the complexity classes they are representing, and by the classes of structures on which they are representing them. 
The first step would be to merge the existing articles into Descriptive complexity theory, and then we could take it from there. Felix QW (talk) 19:01, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed on all accounts. Caleb Stanford (talk) 01:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Rownd a Rownd

message: Does anyone know when Vince Barclay, Owain Barclay, Wyn Humphreys and Sian Richards all joined the show? Their durations boxes are empty. Also why does Terry Phillips' middle name need to be mentioned? Does anyone also know Mel's surname too? The list feels incomplete without all these points.81.99.69.50 (talk) 19:16, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. Is there anybody there?81.99.69.50 (talk) 12:32, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the point of having a talk section if nobody is going to respond to any points to be discussed?81.99.69.50 (talk) 13:41, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Leaving them blank is still better than inserting random years in. You might've been slightly more convincing if you'd have inserted the same years every time; making them up as you go along makes it clear you don't know either. 2.25.38.87 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 19:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing character durations

message: Should we include a former characters section, as with Pobol y Cwm, consisting just of name, actor and duration? As has been mentioned in edit summaries before, this is a relatively obscure soap so once characters get deleted off this Wiki, they're a lot harder to find information on. What if I was to scour through this article's history and accumulate every character that's since departed? Afreoleidddra (talk) 23:48, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former characters 

message: Could someone upload this, please? The title card used in this article was updated in January 2023 CountdownChloe (talk) 21:41, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023 Title Card
Talk:Descriptive geometry

message: May I please offer suggestions for the first paragraph under 
Protocols?  This is meant to be constructive rather than just 
critical.
The second sentence is confusing.  The concept of projecting 
three dimensions onto two is already available from the first 
sentence of the introduction.  The mention of scale is confusing.  
Unless multiple scales are specified, the reader should assume 
that a single consistent scale applies for the whole construction.  
What is meant by "an invisible (point view) axis receding ..."?  
This suggests perspective although that probably was not intended.  
What is meant by "... shares a full-scale view ..."?  Each 
projection can be made independent of the others.  
Rewriting the paragraph should be considered.
Regards,         ...PeterEasthope (talk) 15:16, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I added one of those templates used for that purposes. There actually a lot more things needing work than this sentence, I'm confused also by the diagrams at the end, and most of the info is given without telling the sources. --Allefant (talk) 16:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Since the ancient Egyptian civilization, has been shown, through the discovery of drawings that they used orthogonal projections to build tombs with elliptical roof. Between the first century BC In the first century dp Vitruvius, in his pubblication entitled "De architectura" elements used as a representation of buildings and plants prospectuses he called iconography and orthographies. In later times, the work of Jacopo Barozzi da Vignola "the five orders of architecture" which used the method of Monge. During the same period, Alberto Dürer (1471-1528) called some graphs proceedings concerning conical, as flat sections of quadric cone and also the study of perspective. In 1600 Girard Desargues scholars and Guarino Guarini have laid the foundations for the emergence of discipline "descriptive geometry" of this name has been christened by the French scientist Gaspard Monge (1746-1818). In 1700 the book was published "descriptive geometry" which posed the fundamental rules of descriptive geometry. Rules that are aimed, above all, to be on an equal footing (that plan projection), the objects in 3D. Currently includes descriptive geometry as an integral part projective geometry where the most significant studies and should be conclusive to Jean Victor Poncelet (1788-1867) disciple of Monge. With the projective geometry is introduced the concept of geometric improper Authority (point, and right plan), which determines a substantial difference with Euclidean geometry, although the remaining valid postulates of Euclid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.59.173.91 (talk) 14:18, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History ( to correct)
Talk:List of Brookside characters

message: Except for the most significant characters, none are notable and they will likely fall to AfD.  Comments?  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 21:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I follow the following strategy. I tagged almost articles for notability per WP:FICTION. After some weeks/months I prod for deletion all the articles that are less than 5 lines and have insignificant history. All the others I convert them to redirects. I don't tag all the articles altogether to give a chance for people to improve them or express their disagreement. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since you last posted here a lot of character articles have been created or expanded. The example I came upon is Jack Michaelson which is definitely doesn't meet the GNG and I'm confident would fail AfD. Is there a systematic way to deal with all these articles, most of which wouldn't pass AfD? -M.Nelson (talk) 11:46, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

text: M.Nelson I think you may resume the effort I did 12 years ago. I think now we have a better understanding that these pages should all be trimmed and merged. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:51, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge all into this article? 

message: There's not a lot of point in having a list without any web links, so I've turned some of the names into links.  Many of these pages already exist; many others are still to be created.  I've deliberately chosen only the characters that I remember from my time as a Brookside viewer (1985-1990) plus a few others I know to be significant characters (eg Beth Jordache) - I'll add in new articles for characters as soon as I can.  Hopefully someone can help with other characters I've not marked. Niki2006 (talk) 20:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. Most of the links you re-created are just redirects to the same article. Me and some pother users have delinked them. Moreover, most of the characters are failing notability per WP:FICT. -- Magioladitis (talk) 15:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to character pages 

message: In line with other characters on other soaps, I am going to start creating pages of some of the more notable characters (Ron Dixon, Beth Jordache, Mandy Jordache, Trevor Jordache, Bobby Grant, Shiela Grant, Sinbad, Jackie Corkhill, Lindsay Corkhill etc). Mtaylor848 (talk) 18:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Character pages
Talk:Sinbad Sweeney

message: The article says: 
This turned out to be a short-term move after luckless Sinbad was caught in bed with the family dog, "Cracker." This indiscretion blossomed into a clandestine relationship off-set ending when John (the actor who played "Cracker" left to begin a new job in the States as a barman.
So Sinbad was having a sexual affair with a dog? Errm, just how did the dog become a barman? (83.13.39.98 (talk) 13:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Could someone explain this to me, please?
Talk:Ron Dixon (Brookside)

message: In the episode aired on 1 December 1993, it was reported that Ron was ecstatic by what he saw at the hospital (obviously when visting Tony), only for his elation to soon turn to devastation. If my memory serves me correctly, didn't Tony briefly regain consciousness at least to some extent - Ron was even speaking of his hopes that Tony would be out of hospital by Christmas just over 3 weeks later. But I also seem to remember that very soon afterwards the doctor told Ron that Tony's condition was not as good as it had appeared. This seems to fit in well with the title of this episode "No Chance At All".
And indeed by the episode aired on 12 January 1994, Tony was clearly still in a coma to the extent that the doctor felt there was no chance of him ever awakening. In the next episode, Ron seemed to accept this and felt that it would be better for Tony to die. On 19 January, he even bade farewell to his son in hospital and decided it would be the last time he would see him (although I have no recollection of whether he visited him again). Around this time or possibly shortly after, however, he did give former wife DD (Tony's mother) permission to take Tony to Lourdes in hope of finding a miracle cure. Tony finally died (off screen if I remember accurately) on the episode aired on 7 February 1994, and Ron received the news from DD.
Can anyone shed any full light on what happened. With the exception of 14 January 1994 episode and a few brief clips of the crash which occured in the episode occured on either 3 or 5 November 1993, there are currently no episodes of the crucial time (ie the accident up to Tony's death) to verify what exactly happened during the final 3 months of his life.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.115.38 (talk) 20:14, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Death of Ron's son Tony
Talk:Mike Dixon (Brookside)

message: "Mike Dixon" may need disambiguation, as I arrived at this page through a link from the Libertarian National Congressional Committee page. The intended Mike Dixon is a former national chariman of the Libertarian Party.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.107.0.73 (talk) 22:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Right you are.  Mike Dixon now links to Michael Dixon (disambiguation).  Favonian (talk) 11:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chavakachcheri

message: This article is about a place but there is contraversial information where I find no citations or references to any comment further I feel that the article should about the place than the war.Harlowraman 21:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

message: In accordance with WP:COMMONNAME I have re-named this article from Chavakacheri to Chavakachcheri. The Google search results for the two are:
* Chavakacheri 70,000 results
* Chavakachcheri 456,000 results
--obi2canibetalk contr 22:34, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Sammy Rogers

message: As you can probably tell, I stopped watching Brookside while this character was still in the show - so my knowledge fades away to being non-existent at the end - I'd be grateful if someone more knowledgeable can add or amend. Niki2006 (talk) 22:00, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More detail needed 

message: Could we get an image of the character in the infobox? DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:14, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Rain the 1 22:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Nose Hill Park

message: Possibly include more details about the city's fight against possible development? The city went to the supreme court of Canada to resolve the issue.  It shows the park was a long time coming. Hartel Holdings Co. Ltd. v. City of Calgary, 1984 CanLII 137 (SCC), [1984] 1 SCR 337, <http://canlii.ca/t/1xv20>.
--Sometimesthinking (talk) 00:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some of this article seems to be lifted from here.  TastyCakes (talk) 16:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: comment
Talk:Mill Woods

message: *Removed the section about Urban Legends. The supposed legend about Yao Ming raping children is pure vandalism, and I can say that, as someone who has lived in Edmonton for 25 years, I have not once heard of this so-called urban legend. --Asnider (talk) 20:21, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think it would be good to clean up the multitude of point form sentences near the bottom of the article. A section or paragraph describing the ethnicities of Mill Woods going beyond only the Indian description would be a great addition.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.149.106.103 (talk) 22:41, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup of Neighbourhood Details 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alberta/Assessment

message: * Henry Norwest I expanded the article a fair bit, so I'd appreciate a re-assessment because I do not think that it is a stub anymore. CplKlinger (talk) 02:37, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested assessments

message: Your assessment table looks empty now because the assessment categories have been moved from "X-Class WikiProject Alberta articles" to just "X-Class Alberta articles".  The table will fill back up on its own once the job queue and bots catch up to the change.  --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 19:17, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Empty table
Talk:Diagram (category theory)

message: The article would be more accessible to interested amateurs if it offered some motivations or intuitions for the notions of "diagram" and "cone".  I'm not asking for the historical reasons for these terms, just an indication of why these terms might suggest themselves for, or partly describe, the relevant notions of category theory.
yoyo (talk) 22:13, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Is saying that "its like an indexed family in set theory" not enough?  Perhaps its not. The examples could be expanded to mention products, coproducts, pullbacks pushouts and limits; would this be enough? linas (talk) 15:38, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accessibility
Talk:Ben Williams (Family Affairs)

message: I have requested that the English football player at Ben Williams is moved to Ben Williams (footballer) as I don't believe he, or any of the other Ben Williams', meet the requirements for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. This would then mean that Ben Williams (disambiguation) is moved to Ben Williams. Discussion is here. Tassedethe (talk) 17:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move of [[Ben Williams (disambiguation)]]
Talk:Benton, Louisiana

message: I found no citation material stating that there were seven deaths, but I found many stating that there were six.  I have no reason to doubt the previous editor, and I'd hate to give misinformation.  However, because there was no citation or reference I had to give the most accurate and consistent report that I could provide.Wikiwikikid (talk) 21:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tornado Citation

message: BentonHighSchool.com has a very good history of the Benton area schools, but because I'd likely be quoting the page in its entirety I have requested permission from the webmaster to do so.  I will update further after his nod.  I'm new to Wikipedia so if this is the incorrect method please let me know!  Thanks.Wikiwikikid (talk) 21:45, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Schools Section

message: There is a railroad history of Benton, Louisiana on Facebook. See the article "Benton Holdout" in the files area of the St. Louis Southwestern Facebook Group. https://www.facebook.com/groups/SSWfbgroup/10152794636061895/ SSW9389 (talk) 12:12, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benton Railroad History 
Talk:Dickson's lemma

message: I have a couple of reservations regarding this article.
Clarity: the statement of the lemma is very clear, but the discussion following it (regarding Topology and the Lemma's proof) is not, so I hope that it can be improved.
Sources: It is claimed that the lemma was known before Dickson's paper. Such a statement should be supported by a reference; giving a name of a person and claiming without reference that the lemma "was known to him" is not up to Wikipedia standards.
"It is a simple fact": a very unscientific statement. Fermat's theorem is also a simple fact, right?
AmirOnWiki (talk) 13:48, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to rewrite it. Is that better? JordiGH (talk) 17:53, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Julie-Ann Jones

message: OK I have changed Julie Ann's year of birth to 1981 from 1980. In an episode from mid January 2000 she makes a reference to her age when she talks about Pete finding out she was his daughter. She says "and finding out that he has an 18 year old daughter" so this makes her born inbetween January 1981 and January 1982. Most probably the second half of 1981. 
Benny 1982--Benny1982 (talk) 17:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth.
Talk:Madonna Church (Fort Lee, New Jersey)

message: The notability of this church is currently unclear, since no sources are cited. By the notability criteria, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that a subject is notable. In this case, these sources might be books in which the church or its history is described, for example. The sources may, but need not, be available online; it is however important that they are explicitly cited.
Please add independent sources in order to establish notability. For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 17:47, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Campbell-Christie House

message: While the fact is correct that Christie invented a front wheel drive system adaptable to horse drawn firefighting devices in 1911 (produced 1911-1918), he in fact used his own front wheel drive system already in his race cars after 1903. He also built a small number of fwd automobiles between 1905 and 1908, but not to much success.--Chief tin cloud (talk) 19:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christie front wheel drive