lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ian Smith (New Zealand cricketer)

message: I found this information pasted onto the end of the article Ian Smith (former Prime Minister of Rhodesia.  It most emphatically does not belong there.  I don't believe in stubs, but I had to move this info. somewhere.  I do not know enough about this person to destubbify the resulting article.  I hope someone else can. David Cannon 02:59, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Has he got any rugby pedigree as I've heard him commentating on All Blacks games and obviously whenever the NZ team are over in the UK playing cricket.Londo06 09:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Would like to know, but most cricket-rugby crossovers seem to be only about the cricket side of things.--MacRusgail (talk) 17:31, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rugby Union
Talk:Aisha

message: A lot has been said about Aisha's age when marrying the Prophet Muhammad, Whether she was 6, 9, or 16, when she was first betrothed and married. Prophet Michael, God's Disciple (talk) 01:23, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. And your point is ...? Hopefully you can make a point that is relevant to Wikipedia's content policies and guidelines. ~Anachronist (talk) 02:53, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: My point is, it could make a interesting topic for a wikipedia page.  Considering the fact that it's one of the most common criticisms of Muhammad. 2601:C5:100:11:3476:8E75:5EA0:2C3E (talk) 02:55, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Go right ahead, be WP:BOLD and go to WP:AFC, and follow the instructions to start working on a draft. If the topic of the "age controversy" is notable, there should be multiple reliable sources discussing it (not debating her age, but actually reporting on the controversy). ~Anachronist (talk) 03:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Aisha Age Controversy 

message: i don't see any sources for aisha being born in 614 in the article 197.48.252.182 (talk) 07:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See the first sentence in the section titled "Early life". There are two sources cited. ~Anachronist (talk) 08:06, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for aidha birthdate
Talk:Epitome

message: No consensus to delete. VfD notice removed. Deletion debate archived below. - Cecropia 03:56, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion Discussion 

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 17:33, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008-04-8 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: (I was not part of the previous discussion) This is a dictionary entry. There is no coherent topic here. It simply provides various usages and definitions of the word. If somebody wants to take one or more of those definitions and write articles on the implied topics that might be appropriate but this particular article doesn't belong.
--Mcorazao (talk) 17:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renew deletion 

message: If I understand it well, a Reader's Digest is a short version of some novels; are those to be considered as epitome or not ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.22.218.36 (talk) 11:40, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  question : is a Reader's Digest an epitome  

message: I think the computer related section needs to be in a separate article, Epitome (computing). It would be nice if someone could expand on the topic. Right now it's not clear how it is different from compression. 79.180.168.5 (talk) 15:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split computer-related section? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Epitome (temp). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 1#Epitome (temp) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:00, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Epitome (temp)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Leaders by year

message: For the purposes of centralized discussion, please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years#Proposed merger with WikiProject Leaders by year. John Carter (talk) 00:51, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: ;List of cleanup articles for your project
If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see:  Cleanup listings A list of examples is here
;Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages" 
If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation page",  contact me, User talk:Ikip
;Watchlisting all unreferenced articles
If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip
Ikip  02:16, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people

message: Hi! In the basque language wikipedia (WP:EU) we have developed a world map graphical system to put the state leaders by year. These work is not as complete as it's yours (as we have started this week with the data), but maybe could be useful for en:wp. The system can be seen, for example in current year: :eu:2010#Agintariak. We have only 4 leadres now, but this can be expanded with a little work. We're using bots to put long leaders lapses.
It's based on Location map+ template, using the Location map World basemap and putting each leader using a template developed with the Location map~. We're now discussing about linking directly the flag and not a symbol, but the main idea is that.
If you want, you can copy it, of course. -Theklan (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A maybe better layout for data developed in WP:EU 

message: Hey guys, ive been working pretty hard on this project for a while now. See here for my current status. Right now im wondering from which year i should include the Archbishopric of Mainz. Its not clear to me when it accumulated enough territorial possessions to constitute a state. Can anyone help me? Omegastar (talk) 12:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: It is suggested that pages such as "List of state leaders in 1... 100" be merged into pages such as List of state leaders in the 1st century. Please discuss at Talk:List of state leaders in the 1st century. tahc chat 22:47, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge lists "List of state leaders in 000" to "List of state leaders in the 00th century"
Talk:Phat

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Superphat and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 20#Superphat until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 21:11, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Superphat" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Goodyear Inflatoplane

message: Tony Long of Wired Magazine plagarized from this article (specifically the opening sentences were lifted unchanged.)
http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/multimedia/2008/07/gallery_experimental_50s_aircraft?slide=6&slideView=6  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.82.108.78 (talk) 11:59, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wired plagarism 

message: This article would benefit from a photo or diagram of a deflated plane as one great advantage is portability.
31.68.64.216 (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo or Diagram of a deflated plane 

message: I have found a decent-ish source for some details of the aircraft, It is a Youtube clip of the CBS show "I've Got a Secret" where they spend a good ten minutes talking about and demonstrating the plane.
Youtube: "I've Got a Secret" - Inflatable 'Inflatoplane' Airplane
YouTube
But I have no other information about this episode of the this VERY long running show, so I'm not sure how to go about constructing the reference in proper wikipedia style.
I botched it the first time I tried, so I need to brush up on what I am doing, but the information added is accurate, just not YET properly cited.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.20.31.86 (talk) 11:46, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  To the best of my ability I have patched in a ref for the episode in question, not wild about it but not sure how to improve itJmackaerospace (talk) 12:25, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youtube Link
Talk:America's Next Top Model

message: Add bullet point under "Contestants' crossover appearances":
Lio Tipton (credited as Analeigh Tipton) appeared in the movie Lucy with Scarlett Johansson as Lucy's friend and roommate, Caroline, in Taiwan.
https://www.google.com/search?q=lucy+(movie)&oq=lucy+(movie)&aqs=chrome..69i57.4592j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#wptab=s:H4sIAAAAAAAAAONgVuLSz9U3KDc2KytMecRoyi3w8sc9YSmdSWtOXmNU4-IKzsgvd80rySypFJLgYoOy-KR4uJC08exi4nDLzMl1TiwuWcTKmVOaXKmQDGQDAOYbfANdAAAA Nbouthot77 (talk) 23:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Links to Google searches are not acceptable as reliable sources. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 October 2021
Talk:Heinz Fischer

message: I don't think it necessary that an article has an external link to a political opponent, in this case Benita Ferrero-Waldner, especially if the linked page doesn't provide any crucial informations about Heinz Fischer; if anybody is interested in Benita Ferrero-Waldner, she is mentioned in the article and a link to her homepage can be found in her article.
--FermatSim 16:12, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to benita.at 

message: There is now a selection for him at wikimedia commons. I tried to add the best one but it had the same name as the old fair use one so tht came up instead. If anyone knows how to get he good commons image up please do it cos this one is relatively poor--Ruddyell 23:56, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: This article must be protected. --Vojvodae please be free to write :) 19:24, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection

message: Fischer's membership in the SPOe is currently resting. If you see the German Wikipedia, you'll find no reference to his current status as a social democrat. There'd be much more sources in German, but i found those in English: , , . The last source is from the Wiener Zeitung which is said to be the oldest daily newspaper in the world an which is actually owned by the Austrian state. So the thing is clear for me. --Glorfindel Goldscheitel (talk) 12:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fischer and social democracy 

message: The second term is usually, but not necessarily the last term for a President of Austria. He is not allowed to be elected a third consecutive (!) time, but he could run again later on. (Given his age this is unlikely.) Or someone could trigger a recall vote and if that fails, he will automatically get another full term in office. (Not very likely either.)
So maybe it should read "most likely last" term.
Ds77 (talk) 18:37, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second term not necessarily last 

message: Another editor continues to insist on the infobox containing the incorrect words 'Religion: Agnosticism', in preference to either 'Religion: none' or 'Religion: none (agnostic)', either of which would be acceptable.  Agnosticism is not a religion; it is the absence of religion.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:46, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agnosticism
Talk:Market failure

message: Truly excellent work on this article!  Good work everyone! --ShaunMacPherson 05:52, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compliments 

message: Lede change recently been changed, summarising  market failure net social welfare loss. Before it was summarised as non-Pareto-efficient state. The two are related, which best summaries, or something else?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Market_failure&type=revision&diff=822099108&oldid=821390096
Jonpatterns (talk) 05:11, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, this lede change seems inappropriate. Social welfare is too contestable of a term to use in the Wikipedia voice. Non-Patero-efficient is more accurate, but difficult to understand. I think maximizing economic value is the most accurate language to use.Masebrock (talk) 17:32, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

text: Kaldor–Hicks efficiency is a more general formulation than Pareto efficiency. --Ancheta Wis    (talk  | contribs) 19:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede changed market failure summary 

message: This is a High-importance and C-class economics quality article. It a well-written article with a detailed explanation of market failure, which can brings the idea to viewers. The article has utilised economic evidence and theory and using formal writing, easy for people to read, though it is recommended to provide more real-life examples for further elaborations. The article includes areas and perspective within the economic area quite comprehensively but need more in-depth so as to provide people with a clearer view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sherryfyeung (talk • contribs) 02:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Sherry F. Yeung (S4381861): article assessment

message: Good article, few minor changes including citations and grammar. Also created new link. DomBarclay (talk) 08:08, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: Obtain what?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.145.244.194 (talk) 09:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In none of these cases does the criterion of Pareto efficiency obtain
Talk:Martin Ryle

message: This external link is acting very strange. I guess it is just an ordinary spam. Please act accordingly. --XJamRastafire 07:40, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean?  It seems like a normal webpage to me. -- Curps 10:11, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)

text: Yesterday it was redirecting to some other pages, but now it seems okay. --XJamRastafire 13:05, 28 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link 

message: I have commented out the 3 lines at the end of the Astronomy section (too short; in wrong place; and 'Politics of nuclear disarmament' is not by Ryle, it is by his nephew Martin H Ryle). I have replaced these lines by a new section on 'War, peace and energy'. Alan-Cottey (talk) 17:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  War, peace and energy 
Talk:Portland Pattern Repository

message: The first two links in the external links section, Wiki History and Welcome Visitors lead be to a Forbidden page. Is this the case for everyone? Should the links be removed?
:The links do work. They shouldn't be removed. 2004-12-29T22:45Z 16:55, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
::The "wiki:", "wikiwikiweb:", and "c2:" namespaces should not be used in Wikipedia.  All of these point to an external site (c2.com) and is not a part of Wikipedia.  Because of this, normal external linkage should be used so that the tell tale "external arrow" is shown to the user. -- ShinmaWa(talk) 06:50, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: afd Wikidrone
I have to disagree. It was (is?) the first wiki, and thus has historical significance. The article text could use some rework though, I do agree. -Anonymous-  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.233.255.211 (talk) 21:25, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article is useless noise --> crap 

message: First, the article says that Portland Pattern Repository is the world's first wiki. In the last paragraph, it states that "The PPR is accompanied on c2.com by the first ever wiki (a collection of reader-modifiable Web pages), which is called WikiWikiWeb". This is majorly confusing. Somebody knowledgeable to help out? // habj 14:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first wiki?
Talk:Down on the Upside

message: What should be done about the reviews down the bottom of the page? I am tempted just to delete them as there are reviews in the infobox, but im looking for a second opinion on this one.Grover 10:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews 

message: There is some ambiguity at the end of the the first paragraph: 
"...sales quickly waned and it failed to match the popularity of predecessor Superunknown. Likewise, in 1996 fellow Seattle grunge rockers Alice in Chains released their last studio album with no major tour, and Pearl Jam's popularity suffered from the release of the idiosyncratic No Code."
It is ambiguous whether Soundgarden did a major tour either (which I am pretty sure they did).  Also, the last bit about "No Code" also seems a bit vague.
--Whiteskittlz 03:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore, AIC's self titled album came out in 95, not 96.65.43.214.58 12:32, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language Ambiguity 

message: I don't know why that was removed, it shows that this was one of the last significant albums released during that era. It is widely agreed upon that 1996 was the last major year for the "grunge" craze, by 1998 the whole thing fizzled out in the mainstream, and I think the section should stay there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.172.234 (talk) 14:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "End of grunge" section re-added 

message: As the personnel section is so cluttered, I feel that columns are necessary for clarity purposes. Darwin's Bulldog (talk) 03:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Personnel section

message: There are two deadlinks that I found that I couldn't find an archived copy on web.archive.org or that don't go to where they should go:
*http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/chart_display.jsp?cfi=305&cfgn=Albums&cfn=The+Billboard+200&ci=3023602&cdi=7067011&cid=06%2F08%2F1996 (ref #25)
*http://www.mahasz.hu/m/?menu=slagerlistak&menu2=archivum (ref #60)
–MuZemike 22:10, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deadlinks 
Talk:Holy Water (Bad Company album)

message: I think the title of this page should be changed to "Holy Water (album)" to avoid confusion since most people would probably be looking up the Christian kind when looking up "holy water", and two articles whose only titular difference is capitalization of the "w" would likely lead to a lot of confusion.PhoenixSeraph 04:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Hi,
just wanting to know if I can add the genres "pop metal" & "glam metal" to this album.
Stated as such genres at the following sources. 
Source for Pop-metal: https://www.allmusic.com/album/holy-water-mw0000307980
"Although the only original members on Holy Water are guitarist Mick Ralphs and drummer Simon Kirke, the band does a fair job of approximating the sound of classic Bad Company while adding enough elements of '80s pop-metal to make the record appealing to teenagers who grew up on power ballads"
Source for glam metal: http://web.archive.org/web/20150918205003/http://www.vh1.com/news/205917/hard-rock-heavy-metal-artists-that-went-glam-for-one-album/
Lists as one of the 10 glam metal albums.
Thanks! AgentKozak (talk) 17:24, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding the genres "glam metal" & "pop metal" to this album?
Talk:Hamming code

message: I just spotted the new Example section. It's really beautiful. Good job to the contributor on that. Deco 21:10, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow 

message: In the "General algorithm" section, parity bits are named P1, P2, P4, P8, etc.  Then in the "[7,4] Hamming code" section (which links to a main article), parity bits are named P1, P2, P3, P4, etc.  This is an inconsistency, yes?  I believe the latter naming is more common, so the change should be in the General algorithm section.
JohnHagerman (talk) 20:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent naming of parity bits. 

message: In the third paragraph of this section it says
:"If the decoder does not attempt to correct errors, it can reliably detect triple bit errors."
According to the Parity Bit article:
:"If an odd number of bits (including the parity bit) are transmitted incorrectly, the parity bit will be incorrect, thus indicating that a parity error occurred in the transmission."
Therefore, I assume:
:If the decoder does not attempt to correct errors, it can reliably detect odd number of bit errors.
As I understand, if the algorithm decides to only check all all parity bits, including the extra parity bit, it can detect an odd number of errors.
Am I correct in assuming this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Limoster (talk • contribs) 13:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This section is about Hamming codes with an additional parity bit, not about parity bits on their own. The minimum distance of Hamming codes with an additional parity bit is 4. This means that one, two, and three errors can always be reliably detected! In addition, any odd number of errors can be detected by the parity bit. The section has some stylistic issues, but seems mathematically sound to me. ylloh (talk) 12:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hamming codes with additional parity (SECDED)" - Inconsistency with "Parity Bit" article?
Talk:Operation Sundevil

message: Apparently copied from by the Prodigy. Copyright statement says All rights are fish. Does this mean as free as a fish in the water? -- Chris 73 | (New) Talk 13:31, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The EFF claims that the Blankenship/SJG raid had nothing to do with Operation Sun Devil (sic?) -- http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/SJG/?f=media_errors.sjg.txt #5 -- I am going to edit this page and GURPS Cyberpunk unless someone provides some clarification.  Somegeek 16:59, 2005 Apr 27 (UTC)
* Many, many people associate the raid on Steve Jackson Games with Operation Sundevil.  I'm not sure what edits you have in mind, but I would suggest clarifying the text as you see fit while documenting the distinction the EFF makes between the two raids.    —RaD Man (talk) 08:25, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "best known raid" not part of Sundevil 

message: I believe the E911 "theft" was by Kevin Mitnick.  His defense lawyer also noted that copies were available for purchase by the general public.
* It was Len Rose, not Kevin Mitnick. Jonl 17:31, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  E911 Theft 

message: Hi folks. I put a 'citation needed' template next to the sentence claiming that phreaks caused a great deal of monetary loss for phone companies. Thought about deleting it outright, as there is actually very little evidence for this...but perhaps someone would like to dig some up. If so, please link it. Otherwise, I'd suggest removing that sentence or replacing it with something along the lines of 'Phone companies claimed...' or 'Phone companies complained of financial losses from phreaking activities' both of which are certainly demonstrably true. 
Cheers.
72.0.72.98 (talk) 02:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I like your wording better. I've added a citation, but I've replaced the sentence in question as well. ɳOCTURNEɳOIR (t • c) 02:33, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Edits 
Talk:Ferrari 575M Maranello

message: Someone should mention the 2005 Ferrari Superamerica. I'm not sure how to incorporate it into the article. —Vespristiano 00:01, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 Ferrari 575 Superamerica 

message: how come there is no mention of horsepower it's all kilowatts or something.  Metric system be damned cars are measured in hp the world round.
All stats for Non US origin cars should be listed in SI units (with the exception of power for British cars) conversions for other systems can be listed afterwards in brackets.(86.31.177.192 (talk) 18:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: the hell

message: At least five 575 GTZ exist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.144.112.204 (talk) 16:34, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: info

message: They are basically the same car (575M is just a"modification" or "update" on the 550)
Perhaps the combined article could be titled "Ferrari Maranello" or "Ferrari 550"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.221.181.197 (talk) 04:46, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge this article with [[Ferrari 550]]