Talk:Homophobic propaganda

message: How come "gay propaganda" article doesn't exist?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.136.99.107 (talk) 21:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Because being gay isn't a political agenda, but personal attraction. However, spreading rumours and lies against the specific group that is gay people, in order to induce popular dissent against them, is close enough to the dictionary definition of propaganda. Alwaysgonnaedit (talk) 12:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: gay propaganda

message: It was a  mistake to change the title. There are thousands of links to the old formulation, and only a couple of dozen to the present one. Also, "homophobic propaganda" is used in scholarly papers. Absolutely a valid term, despite what this or that editor may claim. Haiduc 15:22, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Against rename. This title is more neutral. --Nikolay Kolpakov 20:12, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Some people think that Homophobia, the term itself is not neutral, but the article on this topic exists. So what? Let's immediately rename Homophobia to Anti-homosexualism.--Antanta 08:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Renaming Homophobia would be right. :) --Vovanium 18:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  You should first write a scientific work proving that this term is more appropriate, then publish your work in a peer-reviewed journal and then convince a suffucient number of scientists that your term is more correct. Only after all that you can rename Homophobia. Hurry up, there's not much time left.--Antanta 05:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Do not rename this article without discussion. See also--Nikolay Kolpakov 20:17, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Against rename. per Nikolay Kolpakov. Serebr 21:13, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you, TWM. I am agree with Anti-gay propaganda. --Nikolay Kolpakov 19:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

text:  Gay in other languages (esp. Russian) means only "homosexual men", which does not include lesbians. It's a very narrow term, specific for English language and thus is not appropriate.--Antanta 08:24, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  In English gay is also mostly (but not exclusively, unlike in, say, Russian) applied to homosexual men. So "anti-gay propaganda" is less appropriate in English too. rombik 09:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

text: This is English Wikipedia, not Russian, mr. Soularis. --the wrong man 16:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restore title 

message: I have removed this article from this category as it does not meet the category's explicit criteria for inclusion.  The category description clearly says that articles relating to prejudice itself belong in the category, but that articles relating to overt expressions of those prejudices belong elsewhere.  --7Kim (talk) 09:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from Category: Sexual and gender prejudices 

message: Does anti-pederasty count as a form of homophobic propaganda ? I think that there are some people who are able to tolerate homosexuals but who are nevertheless intolerant of pederasty. ADM (talk) 05:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Please present reliable sources to promote that viewpoint.  -- Banjeboi 01:27, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-pederasty

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:46, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: This article talks about how homosexuals where not systemically persecuted by the Nazis, but then talks about over 50,000 men being prosecuted and fined and a large number sent to concentration camps, which certainly would qualify as "systemic". 2601:681:300:300:A0C0:4280:1338:B5C5 (talk) 17:46, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Systemic oppression