Talk:Windows Essentials

message: What does Windows Live Butterfly has to do with Windows Live Essentials? Why is it merged into this topic? Pikablu0530 01:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Windows Live Butterfly?

message: :Image:Windows Live Dashboard.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Windows Live Dashboard.jpg

message: Recently windows announced modifications and specifications for an upcoming update. Could somone do the research and modify the article accordingly?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.123.25.28 (talk) 19:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version 4 

message: Is there any workaround that makes it possible to use Version 4 on Windows XP..at least the sync feature??--217.89.2.193 (talk) 22:33, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version 4 on XP 

message: Can someone please add information on offline packages for this suite of software? 64.128.27.82 (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offline Packages 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/ms13-045#section1. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Codename Lisa (talk) 07:45, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither copyvio nor revdel. Don't know what Lisa blabbers about. --88.130.116.224 (talk) 18:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I just reverted a vandalism by 88.130.116.224 to this page. This is new: A vandal trying to misdirect attention from his vandalism by saying "Don't know what X blabbers about". 91.98.238.178 (talk) 22:09, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed