lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Inderjit Singh Bindra Stadium

message: This article lacks encyclopedic quality. I know virtually nothing about cricket, but I shouldn't have to in order to understand the article. What is a test venue? And who are "Srinath, Kuruvilla and Mohanty"? Etc. Fang Aili 19:07, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleaned up to the best of my knowledge. A lot of it was fluff; sounds like someone was remeniscing about the great times they had at this stadium.Devanjedi 14:08, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of colleges and universities in Indiana

message: I'm trying to track down the college mentioned in Monica Sone's memoir, Nisei Daughter. She says that during WW2, she was allowed to enroll in Wendell College in Indiana--but I can't find any mention of this school online other than her book. She says the school was in the southern part of the state, on the Ohio River, and affiliated with the Presbyterian church. Did the school change its name or close? Thanks. Aristophanes68 (talk) 15:11, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is/was Wendell College? 
Talk:Bethel University (Indiana)

message: Alright, folks, lets get this article into shape! Whoever copy/pasted from the Bethel main site should know better. I have changed enough that this article is nearly neutral, so I am removing that tag. We need sourcing here, though, so that tag remains.
~~Aaron Nagy~~
:I totally removed the history section due to the copyright violation from the Bethel main site. Piguy101 (talk) 19:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Shape it up
Talk:Portrait of Madame X

message: As the current article is about the Sargent painting rather than about Virginie Amélie Avegno Gautreau herself (who, by the way, was also painted by other artists of the era), I propose moving this article to something like "Portrait of Madame X". Other thoughts? -- Infrogmation 19:15, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  As no objections have surfaced, I will move the current "Virginie Amélie Avegno Gautreau" to "Portrait of Madame X", a title reflecting the actual subject of the article. I will then make a minimal stub start on "Virginie Amélie Avegno Gautreau" which I hope will be filled out into an article as it should be. -- Infrogmation 14:50, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:John Singer Sargent (American, Florence 1856–1925 London) - Madame X (Madame Pierre Gautreau) - Google Art Project.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 15, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-11-15. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:13, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:John Singer Sargent (American, Florence 1856–1925 London) - Madame X (Madame Pierre Gautreau) - Google Art Project.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: The Virginie Amélie Avegno Gautreau article mentions that she controlled her coloring by dying her hair and brows and using lavender-tinted powder on her skin (it would disguise sallow skin like lavender-colored shampoo controls yellowness in white-grey hair, because lavender and yellow are complementary colors). There's no mention of arsenic, so maybe she didn't use it? Many Victorian women ate arsenic trioxide or used it in powdered form for that aristocratic pallor of their skin. There were deaths, I believe. 
But what about her muscle definition? Her shoulders and arms look more developed than I would expect for woman of the aristocratic idle rich. The Antonio de la Gandara portrait lacks that definition, but he painted about 14 years later. Was there no mention among the critics of that muscle definition? Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 06:32, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query - skin color and muscle definition. 

message: I modified the "reception" section to add some more detail, and added an "analysis" section, since there's a lot of historical context involved in why the painting was so scandalous. I'm quite new to editing Wikipedia, would love feedback on this! Remainsuncertain (talk) 01:41, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This was added to an old comment. I moved it here so it would be seen as a recent thread of comments. David notMD (talk) 17:32, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception and Analysis
Talk:Indiana University–Purdue University Columbus

message: I've reverted, for the second time, the insertion of material that was copied word for word from the IUPUC web site at . While the information would certainly be of use in this article, it needs to be rewritten in your own words to be acceptable. Plese see WP:COPYOTHERS. Indyguy (talk) 02:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Issues
Talk:Indiana University School of Medicine

message: not appropriate for a separate article  DGG ( talk ) 21:18, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Regenstrief Institute]] 

message: Indiana University School of Medicine - Evansville into this article. Besides some recent buzz about the campus' new building, there really isn't anything significant about this particular IUSM campus that warrants its own article. Invinciblewalnut (talk) 01:09, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no objection expressed to the merge, so proposer,  should consider merging per BOLD. GenQuest "scribble" 06:59, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Wabash College

message: Preemptively making this topic since the last edit involving it is implied some level of potential censorship involved in the reinstating of the information.
While it is well-referenced, I don't believe that the information as it current stands fits within the context and/or flow of the section. Other than being related to fraternities at Wabash, it departs significantly from the previous paragraphs' context. It's also rather short, again adding to its jarring effect.
Additionally, it is not consistent with how other pages handle similar incidents. For example, Purdue University#Campus_life and Butler_University#Student_life make no mention of controversies involving fraternities, even significant ones. Also, DePauw_University#Campus_life mentions a significant controversy, however it is split off into its own section.
I think this information likely fits better within the Delta Tau Delta page. There are other controversies involving fraternities at Wabash that are not mentioned on the page, but are mentioned within the fraternity page, see Phi Gamma Delta#Local_chapter_or_member_misconduct.
The only reason I can find to potentially keep it is that it is a controversy which resulted in a removal of a house, which is the same result as the DePauw section. However, I believe the other factors mentioned (brevity, jarring-ness, and other standard outlets available) outweigh this.
I will be removing the section and don't believe it should be reinstated unless it is given its own section & expanded. Xyban9 (talk) 20:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delta Tau Delta Alcohol Incident Section
Talk:Norwegian Archive, Library and Museum Authority

message: Not to sure about the english version of the name!
Agtfjott 19:43, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The external links are not working, the pages does not exist. As a result, the information is misleading and this page must be removed.
:Wikipedia does not delete articles just because the external links do not work. If you speak Norwegian (unfortunately, I don't) and can provide the correct external links, I would be more than happy to change them. But besides that, I fail to see why the information in this article is misleading. Websites go down all the time due to technical issues or planned maintenance, but that doesn't mean the Wikipedia article must be taken down as well. Altamel (talk) 02:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links are not working. 
Talk:Book of Deuteronomy

message: If we make abstraction of the narrator's voice, the narratives of the Bible are dystheism.
Otherwise, while ethnic feuds were rather common, the genocides described in the Bible are mostly imaginary. And they did not commit genocides for a simple reason: for most of the Antiquity, the Jews were oppressed rather than oppressors. tgeorgescu (talk)  01:21, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genocide 

message: Not sure if that's the best translation. 'Devar' is a tricky word to translate, but I haven't heard of it translated as such. Could it be that the author what confusing it with 'Shemot' (Exodus), which is indeed translated as names? I think a better translation would be "Words" or "Speeches", or maybe even "Things". What's important to keep in mind is that readings and books are usually given their names from one of the first words of the first verse of that area, and for Devarim that would be the second word of the first verse of the first chapter of the book. That means that in context (https://www.chabad.org/library/bible_cdo/aid/9965#v1) it would probably be more accurate to translate it to the words I have listed above. If I'm mistaken here then please excuse me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BytDwd (talk • contribs) 12:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translating 'Dəḇārīm' as 'Names'? 

message: The author of this section is mistaken about the traditions brought to Judah by Israelite refugees.  Israelites did not worship Yahweh.  Israelites worshiped El.  The origins of Yahweh are Midianite.  
ref: https://www.thetorah.com/article/yhwh-the-original-arabic-meaning-of-the-name?fbclid=IwAR3yeFfQIJG035xNmEIeNCqCjTj7TKIQCQODshNEFG0UxoPUHNeJRAg17YA
What the Israelites did bring to Judah, were the legends of the patriarchs and the story of Joseph.
When the Priestly scribes subsequently began compiling these Israelite, Judean, and Deuteronomist sources into Torah, they were the ones who connected the dots from Joseph to Moses. Spodvoll (talk) 16:57, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composition history
Talk:Maidstone and The Weald (UK Parliament constituency)

message: Should this article be located here? I cite the example of Tiverton and Honiton–unless necessary for disambiguation, it's unnecessary to have such a lengthy name. Mackensen (talk) 19:49, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an issue which has been discussed at WP:UKPC, I'm not entirely sure what the outcome of those discussions was, I believe Wikipedia:Disambiguation (or some such similar page) says that disambiguation should only be done when neccessary, and in this case I don't think it is, therefore I would support the page being moved to Maidstone and The Weald -- Joolz 20:04, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: We have been having a discussion at the Constituency Project talk page - the straw poll supports having the disambiguation suffix on every article. I support that decision and hope we can move all pages to the disambiguation suffix as soon as possible. doktorb wordsdeeds 11:54, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have split out the material relating to the pre-1997 Maidstone constituency to a separate article: Maidstone (UK Parliament constituency).  This is per the convention of WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies that there should be a separate article for each name of constituency.
Apart from avoiding assessments  about how big a change is made between a constituency of one name and its apparent successor, this also avoids a mistake which can arise that if a person is listed as an MP in article, readers who have not read the small print may assume that the person was MP for a constituency of the same name as the article, e.g. that a 19th-century MP listed here was MP for "Maidstone and the Weald" rather than for "Maidstone". --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's an example of the sort of mistake that arises when article names don't match constituency names: see this correction. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And here's the fix for another one, in the List of Stewards of the Chiltern Hundreds. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maidstone pre-1997 
Talk:Fort Miami (Indiana)

message: I'd like to merge this with the Fort Wayne article and rename that article "Forts of Fort Wayne." Everyone seemed to like to rename forts in the 16th-18th centuries. Since there isn't much to be said about most of these posts in the same place, why not put them together? --CTSWyneken(talk) 01:35, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fort Wayne was not built in the same location, and therefore is not part of Fort Miami which is totally a different fort.--Varing (talk) 14:47, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: ALL of them were totally different forts in that sense - they were different buildings, but we don't have 6 articles, one for each rendition.  They were all built in or around Kekionga, the Miami Indian village.  The only thing that distinguishes Fort Wayne is that the Americans owned it instead of foreigners. The city of Fort Wayne encompasses all of the old Indian village, as well as the sites of all the forts. Sbalfour (talk) 19:46, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Fort Wayne (Indiana)]] 
Talk:Fort Ouiatenon

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I notice that Ouiatanon redirects here, but Ouiatenon is a separate article.  It's not a bad article, but I wonder if these two should be merged, since the subject matter is so closely related.  Thought? Mingusboodle (talk) 22:58, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a good question.  They're certainly closely related, but personally I favor keeping them separate.  Fort Ouiatenon refers solely to the European trading post (a rebuilt form of which is still in existence) on the north side of the river, while Ouiatenon was the collection of Indian villages in the plains to the south, the history of which began before European settlement and ended in the 1790s.  Though similar in name, I think they're sufficiently separate in nature to merit discrete articles.  Huwmanbeing ☀★ 02:04, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

text: It might not hurt to make a DAB for them though. Charles Edward (Talk) 02:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: At the very least, each article should link to the other in the intro. Mingusboodle (talk) 22:47, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Huwmanbeing ☀★ 02:23, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Fort Wayne (fort)

message: See talk on other page. --CTSWyneken(talk) 01:38, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Request (see [[Talk:Fort Miami (Indiana)]] 

message: I found this source, which has a contradictory history regarding the rebuilding of the French fort.  I'm tempted to believe this version, because it specifically covers Fort Wayne history.  However, if the information in the article is incorrect, I wonder if it refers to one of the other Fort Miami?  I could use your opinions on this.
Early in the year 1750, Captain Charles DeRaymond completed the new fort on the left bank of the St. Joseph.  It stood on rather high ground (at the present St. Joe Boulevard and Delaware Avenue), less than a mile from the junction of the St. Joseph and St. Mary's.  Chief Cold Foot, a staunch friend of the French, occupied the discarded buildings of the old fort, which became the center of an Indian settlement known as Cold Foot Village.  Half a mile to the south of the new fort, where the maumee turns in its course toward the east, lay the village of Kiskakon.  Most of its inhabitants had joined the English at Pickawillany.* Mingusboodle (talk) 02:53, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History contradiction

message: https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/07/31/culture-wars-fort-wayne-373011 SwissAmish (talk) 19:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for portage location being unmarked industrial site
Talk:Wabash and Erie Canal

message: Loveland is on the Little Miami River, which is as far as I know unsuitable for canal boats. Originally, this article ambiguously said "Miami River" instead. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 05:48, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  If a moment presents itself, I'll check the a source. --CTSWyneken(talk) 10:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loveland 

message: Why is no mention of the canal's use as a water source for power to mills and factories? In many cases this continued long after transportation on the canal had ended. This was critical in many towns like Rochester and also provided power to pump water in city water systems. It seems odd that this is ignored.Corumplex (talk) 23:52, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canal uses other than Transportation
Talk:Flatrock River

message: Per searches of GNIS and Google there don't appear to be any other streams by this name.  Flatrock Creek was originally written at this location; I moved it (per GNIS and DeLorme) last August without controversy.  Malepheasant 04:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Nightstallion (?) 11:23, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Flatrock Creek now redirects here as of today. -Jahnx (talk) 09:15, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Flatrock Creek is about a different stream. I changed it back to what it was before you made it a redirect. older ≠ wiser 17:41, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move to [[Flatrock River]]
Talk:List of rivers of Indiana

message: I've changed "Little Wabash River" to Little River (Indiana) per the GNIS entry here, which lists a 1962 USBGN decision establishing that name.  The USGS also refers to it as "Little River" here, as does this local website.  However, DeLorme refers to it as "Little Wabash River" in its atlas, as does the Huntington, Indiana, entry on britannica.com here, so I've noted it in the list as a variant.  Malepheasant 06:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little River/Little Wabash River
Talk:Kankakee River

message: Please update this section (and include the current date) as necessary, or add info about other sections of the river. Please base your contributions on actual personal experience or first-hand knowledge of the current conditions on the river.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raftman1979 (talk • contribs) 21:17, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, basing contributions on "actual personal experience or first-hand knowledge" would violate Wikipedia's ban on original research.   Xenophon777 (talk) 16:12, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Conditions 

message: Anyone with references able to add something about the flora and fauna of the river? The catfish, carp, birds, trees and such? Xenophon777 (talk) 16:12, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flora and Fauna 

message: Although in Anishinaabemowin, the river is known as Dootoogang-aki-ziibi (Land of the Morass/Bog River), and referring to the Great Kankakee Swamp, I can't find any references to it other than a pun reference that speaks of the Potawatomi stories connecting it to "mother's breast" (doodoosh). Plus, there needs to be something that speak to the Miami name for the river Theakiki. CJLippert (talk) 14:40, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name and its connection to the Great Kankakee Swamp 
Talk:Maumee River

message: Like to see some input on the great Walleye fishing in the Maumee.
:Someone put all that info in Articles for Creation, so I'm just going to merge it in. Hwonder talk contribs 17:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I remember when I was a kid growing up in Toledo during the early 1980's, it was told that no one could decide on a name for the river.  They grabbed a kid and demanded that he name the river or they'd throw him in.  He refused, so they threw him in and he yelled "Mommy! Mommy!".  They pulled him out and that's why they call the River "Maumee".
It's all a bunch of kid story, but there you go.--Pittsburghmuggle (talk) 01:37, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: River naming
Talk:Destroy What Destroys You

message: There is major discrepancy between release dates for this ablum Amazon says it was released in December of 1995 and allmusic says the album was released in July of 1998.  As far as I know Destroy What Destroys You was out long before any other Against All Authority album...does anyone know anything? rydia 20:23, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St. Joseph River (Lake Michigan)

message: Shouldn't the East Race in South Bend be mentioned?  It is in the Sports section of the South Bend entry. Mapsax 00:15, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: East Race

message: I was born and raised in Berrien County, Michigan, spending the first 23 years of my life in and about the St. Joseph River drainage, and having recently returned there following retirement.  I have never heard the river referred to locally as the St. Joseph River of Lake Michigan.  This statement thus appears to have no basis in fact. [[John Trapp (talk) 18:44, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also from Berrien, and I agree. I changed the sentence to take out this reference. Zariane (talk) 16:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: St. Joseph River of Lake Michigan

message: This article reviews The St. Joseph by Kit Lane, part of the Rivers of Michigan series (Pavilion Press of Douglas, Michigan, not to be confused with Philadelphia's Pavilion Press).  Unfortunately there are no other details, including ISBN. Mapsax (talk) 03:26, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Found ISBN. Will add as ref. Mapsax (talk) 00:24, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 book 

message: The text says the river is a canoe route between Lake Michigan and the Mississippi River (or possibly one of its tributaries like Illinois, Kankakee, etc).  Exactly where does the St. Joe's enter a tributary of the Mississippi??  And if it did, it'd therefore be a tributary of the Mississippi, and would drain Lake Michigan instead of draining into Lake Michigan.  Right??  Sbalfour (talk) 02:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  canoe route between where?
Talk:Indiana Limestone

message: Two images do not have any copyright tags; Image:EmpireQuarryOld.jpg and Image:SandersQuarry.JPG. I will be removing them until the proper copyright is placed. Please see Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions. Bear21 17:23, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Wikipedia has a 3 revert rule, meaning that you don't edit a page more than 3 times in 24 hours.
Please see Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule, but keep in mind this does not include self-reverts. To help minimize this please use the "Show Preview" button or go to the Wikipedia:Sandbox to test your ideas. Bear21 17:35, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three-revert rule 

message: The link to superior cut stone maybe spam. Please respond with your comments. Bear21 02:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed promotional link and the History ref link as it wasn't about the history. Vsmith 02:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed History ref link to point to the correct page.Bear21 05:26, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam 

message: Is the capital "L" necessary in limestone (in the article's title)? --Another Believer (Talk) 04:45, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If it is the "common name" as the article says then no. The geological formation name per the article is Salem Limestone, which should be capitalized - although it isn't. Vsmith (talk) 06:11, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Is anyone familiar enough with the convention here? The article contradicts itself with its usage, even right off the bat. ɱ (talk) 22:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Still an issue. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Caps?
Talk:Limberlost Swamp

message: Added headers to provide more distinction to different periods, and works set in the swamp. Expanded the Lead to include late 20th-century restoration of Loblolly Marsh.Parkwells (talk) 00:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing