lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gladstone, Oregon

message: (Correction- Linn City was established on the west bank of the Willamette River, across from Oregon City and Gladstone, and was later incorporated as West Linn in 1913.)
I have moved this from the main article for now. It actually doesn't seem to contradict anything already stated and simply needs to be integrated with the rest of the information? I know most of the other stuff in this article isn't referenced, but is there a source for this info? Katr67 20:14, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction to bit about Linn City

message: (Correction: Harvey Cross purchased the Cason land that included the Cason Family Home (intersection of 82nd Avenue and East Arlington in Gladstone.  The Cross family occupied the Cason home. The Cason/Cross house still stands. It is now a mortuary.)
Is this the sentence that started a precent? Again corrections should be discussed on this page and then integrated into the main article. If the info on the main page is wrong, are there citations for this other info? Katr67 20:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another correction 

message: The article currently mentions that Gladstone's founder, Harvey Cross, had a home in a prominent location that is now a mortuary.  A comment above this states that home is at the intersection of 82nd Avenue and East Arlington.  Can anyone confirm this?  Because, if so, that building is no longer a mortuary - it's a Mr. Rooter location (I just drove by it last week!) Oregongirl0407 18:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current usage of Harvey Cross former home 
Talk:Beating the bishop

message: I suggest putting all such entries into one category and list them out.
Creat a List of vulgar terms instead of simply deleting them.
Does wikipedia have a caution (21 yrs and above page?)
hydkat 08:45, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We already have a number of articles on profanity, the suggested merger seems the obvious way forward (you can just do that without admin intervention, ask me on my talk page if you don't know how) but do remember that this is supposed to be an encyclopaedia, not a mirror of Roger's Profanisaurus. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  AfD? 10:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Recovered-memory therapy

message: I'm trying to put together a list of all the therapies, interview techniques, practices, etc. that researchers & clinicians have called "recovered-memory therapy" and I'm pretty sure it's not gonna fit in those parentheses in the lede lol. Would a section listing them all potentially be useful? Would anyone object?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donna's Cyborg (talk • contribs) 05:15, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of things that have been referred to as RMT? 

message: Hi RMT talk page!
In my wandering, I came across this page and noticed it is quite messy, specifically the Research category. I noticed that a large part of this section refers to the concept of recovered memory, not recovered-memory therapy. RMT is a scientifically discredited therapy which has a demonstrated record of causing harm, and I believe conflating it with spontaneous recovery of memory (which is still debated) is quite dangerous. 
Everything in strikeout I propose either deleting or moving to the recovered memory page as it has nothing to do with the actual MODALITY of RMT and more to do with the concept of if memories can be repressed and then spontaneously remembered. Again, RMT is discredited. Repression/spontaneous recovery is debated. So, here are my proposed changes to the research category of this article. The first part I think would be better suited, again, for the recovered memory page. The part about retraction and false memory I think might be better for the false memory page. Proposed additions in bold. I have many citations for the bolded additions, but just want to see if anybody thinks I'm out of here before I go searching my PDFs and link em' all here:
If anybody has any objections to me removing this content, please let me know and we can brainstorm a solution for this page! As detailed above, the subjects are quite a mess and need clarification in line with WP:GEVAL and WP:PSCI. Lefthandedlion  21:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Lefthandedlion you won't get an argument from me, these all look like good changes. The problems with FRINGE topics like this are that they tend to have everything thrown at it in order to cover up that there is nothing there but pseudoscience. It's really quite simple, it doesn't work. Sgerbic (talk) 22:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Once you get these changes made, let's have another look at what is left, maybe more trimming needs to be done. Possibly the Recovered memory page as well. I'm adding these pages to my watchlist. Sgerbic (talk) 22:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parts of the article unrelated to the actual subject - thoughts?
Talk:Cherokee Hair Tampons

message: At the end of the article it is said that this episode is a mini-arc of 3 episodes, with the final episode being: 4th grade, however this links to the normal 4th grade as in the school system and not to the episode.
I would gladly change it but i am a wikin00b 82.171.112.238 16:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link 4th grade

message: When the doctor shows Cartman is the only match for blood type, it says he has AB negative blood [which means so does Kyle]. AB blood can accept A, B, AB and/or O blood so Stan could donate blood.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.75.48.46 (talk) 22:08, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AB Negative 

message: I've gone over the DVD version of this episode a number of times and with all due respect to closed captioning, I'm almost certain Kenny's second to last line in response to Stan's bemoaning Kyle's impending demise (before Kenny's own death) is:
"You never seem to care when I die!" or "You never fucking care when I die!" and "Cartmans line of "Screw you Guys, Im going Home"
Kenny's last line seems to be transcribed correctly. The Dark Ride 03:16, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kenny's final words 

message: Is this episode somehow being excluded from reruns or syndication ?  I have never ever seen it.   I have seen all of the other episodes from that season eight or ten times.Eregli bob (talk) 04:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supressed in syndication ? 
Talk:8 Canada Square

message: I am wondering if this building was in fact made by Foster? At least I can't find it in Fosters portfolio on his website.Wanker
217.116.239.6 08:52, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have some pictures I took of the tower from about the 40th floor of the Canada Square tower if anyone is interested in them being on here.  Two pictures seems enough, but if you want one from a different perspectve just ask.
LeeG 17:46, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: The last couple of lines of the introduction could do with some improvement, especially as the last line seems to cut off half way through a sentence. I would fix this myself, but I don't know what is meant to be there. Jamesmarshall90 (talk) 15:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction
Talk:Financial core

message: I tagged this article as in need of expert attention since it deals with matters of U.S. labor law.  Also the creator and main editor of the article appears to be the author of one of the primary sources cited (a book which is being offered for sale at the referrence link).  Thus, there may be POV and original research concerns. --Benanhalt 08:55, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note the above two responses are from the same anonymous editor posting from 68.227.81.41. Now, it may or may not be the case that the article in question is factually correct.  Not being a legal expert, I do not feel qualified to make that assessment, which is why I am requesting that someone who is an expert review the article.  However, as a person capable of critical thought, I do feel qualified to raise POV concerns in a situation where the only editor contributing to an article bears the name Mmcintire and the second of only two references supporting the article is to the personal website of Mark McIntire, where the author offers for sale a book entitled Financial Core Handbook:  Guide to the Liberation of Compulsory Union Workers.  My primary concern was that this article's main purpose was to provide a platform for the author to plug his work.  Now that I have learned that Mr. McIntire is considered "a controversial and widely hated figure" and that the article concerns "a hotly contested topic," I am even more concerned that there may be POV problems.  If the article is correct and there are other knowledgable editors willing to edit the article and attest to its factual validity and NPOV status, that would be great. And, even though I know better than to feed trolls: 'chilling effect'?  That is the funniest thing I've heard all day!  --Benanhalt 21:16, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I've removed the NPOV template, please use  for sections or  for sentences, then detail issues here. This will help address them in a timely manner. - RoyBoy 00:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Never mind the issue of NPOV; the article fails the most fundamental requirement of an encyclopedia: to explain what the subject is in the opening paragraph.  It says that the Supremes defined it... then fails to give a definition.  OK, maybe it's in that inscrutible "Origins" section somewhere, but I can't find it. - JasonAQuest (talk) 20:41, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: - RoyBoy 00:56, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition
Talk:Just price

message: It is important to note that the "just price" concept occurred in a society where market prices were largely determined by direct producers (farmers and craftspeople) without employers, and with merchant involvement confined to exotic goods or occasions of scarcity (including famine). Hence the examination of the subject from an abstract, ahistoric perspective is misleading. However, since this misconception is common, altering the entire article may violate the NPOV commandment.--Jack Upland 09:14, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context 

message: I think a lot of this article is POV, for example:
"Aquinas would therefore condemn practices such as raising the price of building supplies in the wake of a natural disaster. Increased demand caused by the destruction of existing buildings does not add to a seller's costs, so to take advantage of buyers' increased willingness to pay constituted a species of theft in Aquinas's view."
There is not one reference in this whole article, is this statement above true? Supply and demand works on the principal that if the price is higher, the people who need it can get it, and the guy who was going to buy wood for a little personal project will probably wait for the price to go back down. Therefore, it leaves valuable material behind for those who really need it.
Does anybody watch this article? Wikidan829 13:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 

message: “At the new framework, none could accumulate money under the bed for stroke him between dawn swoon of fetishistic perversion, but I had to bet it quickly on overall growth of the economy before inflation turned it into dust. If he committed the blunder of investing it in the impoverishment of anyone else, would be investing in his own bankruptcy.”
Has this been badly machine-translated or something? Pseudomonas(talk) 15:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear quote 
Talk:National Film Award for Best Feature Film

message: FYI.Best awarded Film Pulijanmam is released in year 2006 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1102308/). Not 2007.
No award has been given to 2007 films yet. So I am reverting ur changes.-thanks
vijesh  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijeshchandran (talk • contribs) 12:10, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  national film award last year 

message: could u elaborate me on why did u change the year for this film. Please refer to imdb and go ahead with changes. I appreciate if u cud change the year. I can wait for a while.-thanks--Vijesh (talk) 12:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear see the page writen The 54th National Film Awards for 2006 were announced here on Tuesday with Malayalam film “Pulijanmam” by director Priyanandanan being selected as the best feature film this awards given in 2007 and the film was released in 2006. Altime National Film Awards gives the previous yaer's film. I think you understand.-Thanks. Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 12:33, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Please see the following links---,,Google Search.-Thanks. Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 11:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes dear The 54th National Film Awards function was held in New Delhi on September 02, 2008... Yes So you can say that the awards gives in 2008 of (for the year 2006 instead of 2007) National Film Award for Best Film.see it.-Thanks. Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 12:36, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  hello 
Talk:National Film Award for Best Direction

message: National Film Award for Best Directing →  — All the official press releases till date have the award name as 'Best Director'. Page is not allowed to move to the proposed name as page with the proposed name already exists and redirects to the page with the current name. Page name should be given same as in the official press releases by Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India. References are in the reference list of the page. Thanks Vivvt (talk) 13:03, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: . Jafeluv (talk) 14:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to National Film Award for Best Direction 
Talk:Social role valorization

message: Entire majority members of research professions in the US and worldwide dispute the concept of neutrality when it comes to "values-based" as essential for health and human services (who wants neutrality on whether people live or die or are healthy or unhealthy); this position is considered to be revolutionary in the 1970s. It is disputed throughout the journals, research worlds, and professions, and generally comes in as "qualitative" versus "quantitative" research (later only is "empirical" to those who believe in "neutrality"). Positivism is associated also usually as a perjorative with a movement to enhance versus denigrate as scientistis often do (e.g., will not do both sociology of acceptance and sociology of deviance; "neutrality" is deviance)those who are different.
24.59.153.150 (talk) 14:02, 12 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: General comments
Talk:Shunt (medical)

message: Are there any other kinds of shunts? Is a tracheotomy tube a shunt? Or the ones used for emergency release of air from the thoracic cavity after major lung injury? Quite possibly there are more. bcatt 09:40, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I moved Pulmonary Shunt from the Cerebral Shunt heading into it's own heading and wikified some of the terms, but I think it needs a bit more explanation and a link to it's own article.
Also, perhaps the portosystemic shunt should have a little blurb that includes the current link to it's own article? With the other two items under "see also", it doesn't seem appropriate to include them here...perhaps there should be one of those templates at the top that links to the shunt disambig page? I had added a "shunt (medical)" link to the shunt disambig page, but it was removed when some vandalism was removed, but I'll get that put back. Any thoughts? bcatt 22:28, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll go ahead and add a section with a brief description on portosystemic shunts, but I don't know anything about this type of shunt in humans.  Please add anything you think might be appropriate.  --Joelmills 05:12, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New edits and thoughts on how to improve the article 

message: I think this page ought to be split into separate pages for the different types of medical shunts. Any thoughts/objections? --Arcadian 16:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Serviceability

message: :I am referring to serviceability from the civil engineering POV. I think the subject matter of serviceability should be expanded. There is no way to assess the serviceability a building once completely constructed. Hence we rely on various building codes.
:The concept of limit states are bound to be confusing to an average person. Further there should be a separate section explaining the same.
:--Arun T Jayapal 09:52, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I consider serviceability an engineering concept, therefore, I suggest serviceability (engineering), and I suggest renaming the article serviceability (computer) to serviceability (computer science) or serviceability (computer engineering).  70.247.160.227 (talk) 01:13, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Have also suggested on talk page of serviceability (structure) that it be renamed to serviceability (civil engineering).  70.247.160.227 (talk) 01:18, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand Serviceability Concept
Talk:Katrina Kaif

message: I wouldn't count 3/5 films being commercially successful being continued success. Iknowthingsaboutstuff1 (talk) 23:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed both instances as I agree. The wording is subjective and promo. --CNMall41 (talk) 01:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subheadings in career section 

message: Katrina Kaif’s real name is Katrina Rosemary Turcotte. Markanto (talk) 19:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If you read the article, you'll note that Turcotte is already mentioned. You'll need a source for the "Rosemary" part. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 March 2024 

message: The redirect Katrina Kaushal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Krimuk2.0 (talk) 19:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Katrina Kaushal]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Classic Albums

message: Can't SOMEBODY learn how to put things in correct alphabetical order?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.138.235.243 (talk) 15:41, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: For the love of God....

message: On the Dutch station rtl7, there are episodes that I don't remember from the BBC, like about Metallica. This is called 'Metal Classic Albums'. Is it their own production or is the BBC in anyway involved? DirkvdM 10:09, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Others by the same name?

message: When I wrote this stub a month ago, I was proud to anbnounce that this series is realy about the music, with hardly ever anything about the band and its members, for a change. Now there is a new series, with the first episode about Motörhead, and that's argely about the band members. Nice. Now in the case of Motorhead, I must admit that the guys in the band are more interresting than the music (I suppose even the fans will agree with that), so that's cool. But I hope that's just a one off thing. DirkvdM 17:41, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only about the music? 

message: I'm sorry, but VH1 classic has not yet picked up the following albums, are these actual
episodes or opinion, as VH1 Classic has yet to show them (BBC only?)
If i could have conformation of their airing, it would help the article.
* Avenged Sevenfold - Waking the Fallen
* NaS - Illmatic
* Oasis - (What's the Story) Morning Glory?
*Rage Against the Machine - The Battle Of Los Angeles
* Radiohead - OK Computer
* Red Hot Chili Peppers - Blood Sugar Sex Magik
* R.E.M. - Automatic for the People
* Simply Red - Stars
* Sonic Youth - Daydream Nation
* The Smashing Pumpkins - Mellon Collie and the Infinite Sadness
* The Stone Roses - The Stone Roses
* XTC - Skylarking
Doc Strange 15:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New Shows?
Talk:ShmooCon

message: * I've un-done the anonymous edit which changed "hacker con" to "computer security con" - for two (well, three) reasons.
** On the shmoocon.org website they call the conference a hacker convention, no-where do they call it a computer security convention.
** There is already a category of hacker conventions on Wikipedia which this conference definitley falls into.
** They're really the same difference, and the atmosphere at shmoocon is more that of a "hacker con", I beleive.
       --CraSH 10:35, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Undo

message: No one has been willing to work on it, apparently, because I found it in a horrible state. Broken links, bad wikilinks, full of garbage, etc. Enigmamsg 04:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also had poor spelling and capitalization. Enigmamsg 04:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a disaster
Talk:EGABTR

message: How is this a trojan?
*It attracted the user by acting as an applicaion that would improve graphics and in turn, deleted the FAT. Sounds like a trojan to me... --Eddie 03:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trojan 

message: I added a source to a BitDefender document which mentions EGABTR because the other two sources didn't load for me. I didn't remove them, in case it was a one off. If it's not just me I guess we can remove them. 88.203.21.119 (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Minimum-Maximum Notebook

message: Add some images of the "laptop" packaging? Ricadus 10:43, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bootstrap Bill Turner

message: Is there a source for the claim that he'll be played by Stellan Skarsgård in the sequel(s)? Thanks! —Locke Cole • t • c 10:49, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As an aside, another article (slightly different name) was AFD'd last year, which is why I ask (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/"Bootstrap" Bill Turner). —Locke Cole • t • c 10:51, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Ah, thanks. Wish I'd known about this before with the other version that was deleted. :( —Locke Cole • t • c 23:26, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stellan Skarsgård

message: Perhaps someone should put pictures of "Bootstrap Bill" from different points in the movie, as to show the growth of the sea fauna on his body. For instance, in the beginning of the film, he did not have the starfish on his face, yet later on it was present in throghout the film the barnicles on him amased.--66.24.238.44 03:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appearance changes 

message: the artical has been vandalised someone needs to revert it and possibly semi protect it--Lerdthenerd 20:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism! 

message: Is it just me, or does Bootstrap seem to speak with an Irish accent? If he does, then it should be noted, since the article says he's English. Jienum 20:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accent 
Talk:Wholesaling

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Below wholesale. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 10#Below wholesale until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  CycloneYoris talk! 07:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: result was to delete the redirect to this article —¿philoserf? (talk) 03:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Below wholesale" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: This article looks like a good candidate for a fresh start. I am not that editor. I encourage an editor with the right background to go for it. —¿philoserf? (talk) 15:13, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candidate for [[WP:TNT]]