lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Metropolitanate of Karlovci

message: I do not see any valid scholar sources you ever used to support any of your tags: POV or Merge. Both articles are completely rewritten. Without seeing any credible sources supporting your opinions from your side it's not possible to lead any rational discussion.--Milos zankov (talk) 17:59, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: User [[User:Director|<span style="color:#353535">Director</span>]]
Talk:Patriarchate of Karlovci

message: This article is poorly written, without the relevant sources. Serbian books and encyclopedias articles know nothing about so called "Patriarchate of Karlovci". Instead, every relevant book refers to Karlovci as Metropolitanate, rather than as Patriarchate. For example, the first chapter of The History of the Serbian Orthodox Church (vol. II) by Đoko Slijepčević is titled as "The Serbian Orthodox Church in the form of the Metropolitanate of Karlovci" (Srpska pravoslavna crkva u Karlovačkoj mitropoliji). The Lexicon of Serbian Orthodox Church by Radoslav Grujić also contains an article which is titled as Metropolitanate of Karlovci. So I think this should be merged with Metropolitanate of Karlovci.--Владимир Нимчевић (talk) 14:19, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Poorly written

message: See here. -- Director (talk) 14:51, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You are the one vandalizing it, as far as I can see. Kindly refrain from restoring non-consensus edits against opposition, and discuss on the talkpage. You do not own this article. -- Director (talk) 18:02, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge

message: I do not see any valid scholar sources you ever used to support any of your tags: POV or Merge. Both articles are completely rewritten. Without seeing any credible sources supporting your opinions from your side it's not possible to lead any rational discussion.--Milos zankov (talk) 18:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: User [[User:Director|<span style="color:#353535">Director</span>]]

message: Recent edits by user Axxxion are not according to sources, according to Britannica that they self posted it is written that : In the Balkans changes were even more significant. The five groups of Serbian dioceses (Montenegro, the patriarchate of Karlovci, Dalmatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Serbia) were united (1920–22) under one Serbian patriarch, residing in Belgrade, the capital of the new Yugoslavia. [] The same editing was presented by them with ignoring what other books are saying i.e Paul Robert Magocsi: Historical Atlas of Central Europe, University of Toronto Press, 2002 
"Then, in 1766, when the Ottomans abolished Pec, the Karlovci province became an independent body, eventually with six suffragan bishops (Novi Sad, Timișoara, Vrsac, Buda, Pakrac, and Karlovac), known as the Serbian Orthodox Slav Oriental Church, which after 1848 was raised to the status of a patriarchate." [] I believe that it is not necessary to remind fellow editors that wikipedian should present what it is written in sources not what they think it is right. --Theonewithreason  18:00, 05 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:OR
Talk:Leviathan (Farscape)

message: Was thinking of adding a list of the leviathans shown in the show, when I can get round to flicking through the episodes for it. Any objections? Patch86 15:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well if memory serve it would be a fairly short list, but I see no harm in it, just remember to add references (roughtly when they appear in what episode). --Sherool (talk) 16:36, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Except Moya, Talyn and the dead Leviathan (early season 4) was there any other? » byeee 18:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Season 4 had Elack in "Crichton Kicks" and "What Was Lost", and an unnamed Leviathan corpse in "Bringing Home the Beacon". --DocumentN (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Leviathans
Talk:List of Osamu Tezuka manga

message: Which is no good as a source that average Joe and Mary Reader can read. In fact, it's no source at all.
Why not try http://tezukainenglish.com/ instead?
Timothy Perper (talk) 14:52, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Or try http://tezukaosamu.net/en/manga/a.html -- which has a long list of Tezuka's manga titles in English. And doesn't need a password. Timothy Perper (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source Needs a Password to Access
Wikipedia talk:When to cite

message: My example:
In the article "kunduz hospital air strike" I made a statement regarding the first Geneva Convention, I linked to the article "First Geneva Convention", and there are references to the needed documentation. Do I have to repeat this references in "kunduz hospital air strike" or can I trust on the link leading to the in detail coverage of the subject in the article I link to?Jochum (talk) 03:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference when the statement in one article is linked to another article in wikipedia
Talk:Thaddius Vent

message: Instead of speedy deletion, the adminstrator dealing with this might consider turning it into a redirect to Oscar's Orchestra as this is the show from which this character comes.  No real views on whether it merits speedy deletion: plus COI in that my new adoptee created the article and my former adoptee has CSD-tagged it!  Bencherlite 15:56, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No COI on my part. I think that a CSD is inappropriate here. A merge & redirect is the correct course. —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 17:23, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I agree.  This should be a redirect.  Useight 17:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Whoops, I guess that would be a COI, wouldn't it? I think a redirect would be more appropriate too, but I'll leave it to you guys; it really isn't my place. --CA387 19:40, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Maryland Route 21

message: MD 21 is obscenely short.  I think it should be merged with the minor state highways page.  A junction list section would be completely unnecessary because it only junctions four roads, and the only state-level ones are at each end.  --Onore Baka Sama (talk) 17:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with minor highways?

message: I've downgraded this article to C. It's much too short for a B. Folklore1 (talk) 20:26, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Class evaluation
Talk:Ira Gitler

message: In Russian there is no letter H, and foreign words that start with it normally use G instead. So shouldn't there be a link to the Hitler article? 86.149.220.82 (talk) 22:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Lamborghini Diablo GT

message: Hello,
just wanted to let you know that the facts on the Diablo GT page are incorrect. There have been 83 units built, not 80, yes the plaques show numbers 1/80 to 80/80 (I've documented most of them by the way) but there were 3 cars built without this plaque, a first production test prototype that held nr 0/80 (but didn't receive a plaque) and one after the production of the GT's was already finished to be put in the museum ... when you take a look a this car you'll notice it doesn't have a plaque either, a third 'out of production' GT was later built for a customer who made a special request.
I've added this info to the page, but it got deleted because I made a mistake by using www.lambocars.com as the reference to prove this fact... they called it spamming, but when I take a look at the four other references, they are all pointing to lamborghiniregistry.com ... I would say that is spamming, four references, and all four point to the same website, which happens to be run by a single person, Glen who is a nice guy by the way, I do know him personally so I have no reason to disrespect him. WikiBull (talk) 07:37, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors in the article 

message: Me again,
sorry to put a second remark so soon, but I can agree somehow you would see the Diablo SV as the predecessor to the GT, both have rear wheel drive only, so this could be an evolution.
However, the Diablo VT 6.0 is in no way a successor to the stunning Diablo GT, they were available side by side in 2000 and early 2001, the VT 6.0 was the production model at that time, the GT was always a limited edition model, and a much more Spartan version of the daily usable VT 6.0 model.
If you would like to mention a successor I think the Diablo VT 6.0 Special Edition would fit this bill better, it was also a limited edition model, not a spartan, race oriented model, but still limited to only 40 units. WikiBull (talk) 07:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predecessor / Successor ?
Talk:Association of Delaware Valley Independent Schools

message: I've moved the material below from the article's page to here.  The note suggests that this copyright violation will be temporary, and as near as I can tell it's been here for more than a year.  
Working together, ADVIS members promote independent education and strive to make their schools accessible to families of all backgrounds, regardless of income, religion, or ethnicity. The Association's mission is to "support and strengthen the administrative and financial activities of independent member schools by providing professional development, cooperative efforts, and inter-school collaboration." 
Accounting4Taste 16:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: This is clearly a list of schools, and therefore class=list is appropriate. --DThomsen8 (talk) 18:21, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  class=list
Talk:Üliger

message: Based on Mongolian, the correct form would be "Ülger". Does the Buryat spelling look different? --Latebird 16:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: http://web.archive.org/web/20070629223936/http://www.buryatmongol.com/mythology.html Money emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  14:19, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  CCi cache link
Talk:Glocal Forum

message: The article appears to have been written supporters of the organization.  It currently reads like a marketing brochure.  We could really use links to independent third party coverage of the organization and its impact on the sector.  The programs section needs a radical re-write (if it should exist at all).  It currently reads like a brochure an fails to actually give concrete information on the methodologies, results or importance of each project.  A reader gets nothing from the article they couldn't get simply by going to the organization's website.
It seems like this is a significant organization, but the article itself fails to provide appropriate information.  Does anyone know of articles written about Glocal Forum, or if they have been participants in any major studies?  -- SiobhanHansa 13:46, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements
Talk:Larry Fuller (American football)

message: As a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject National Football League, it is my goal to find information and create articles on any and every player that has played in the NFL.  As part of my work on the List of Washington Redskins players, I created the Larry Fuller (football) page because he played for the Washington Redskins.  Jwalte04 16:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Burying in Woollen Acts

message: According to the Chronological Table of the Statutes (HMSO), the 1666 Act was repealed by the Statute Law Revision Act 1863. The other two statutes (1678 and 1680) were repealed by section 1 of the Act 54 Geo.3 c.108, which is in 1814. James500 (talk) 17:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate date of repeal? 

message: In trying to correct an invalid ISBN inserted in 2009, I have been unable to find the exact edition (judging by digit similarity). Since a specific page is cited, this may or may not be an issue. I have left a note on the user's talk page, but they have not edited in a while. Storkk (talk) 17:36, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference ISBN issue
Talk:Aleksander Einseln

message: A green beret is a beanie (a hat) much loved by American Girl Scouts and also worn for some silly or not fully understandable  reason by a huge number of people in the Estonian military. Lot of wannabes in Estonia apparently, quite evidently starting from the top. Perhaps a  "fashion statement"? Aleksander Einseln, on the other hand, was an SF-qualified (graduate of the SF "Q" course) member of the US Army's Special Forces (5th Special Forces Group (Airborne)), with the right that that bestowed upon him to wear a certain article of headgear under discussion here. A human being cannot be a hat, unless you happen to be Salvador Dali or Timothy Leary. --Sean Maleter (talk) 13:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Reichswehreid

message: Can someone translate the oaths as they appear in this article? The first is translated, the others are not, so the difference in them is difficult to pick up for those of us who do not speak any German. Lorangriel 16:53, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! Dr Gangrene 16:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: some translation needed

message: The text of the SS oath cannot be right. To avoid generating historic myths, I strongly suggest taking out this section until fixed. Who has access to reliable sources?  Asigler (talk) 23:22, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done!  Can someone proofread the English translation?  142.103.135.68 (talk) 12:53, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The German Wiki article you've linked to now used the older "Ich schwöre dir..." version that this article previously had. Does anyone actually know which of these two oaths is the real one? The current one we have here, with the "Sieg Heil!" at the end, sounds a little silly to me personally. Maybe one was for the Allgemeine-SS and one was for the Waffen-SS? I don't know. D Boland (talk) 08:17, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: revision needed

message: This should be merged with Hitler oath.VaneWimsey (talk) 17:14, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest Merger
Talk:Gigantoraptor

message: Might hunt like secretary bird.
:Although Sagittarius serpentarius weighs something like 4 kilos and Gigantoraptor about 1,400 kilos.-- 201.51.250.178 13:57, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Is it really accurate to describe T rex as 'ponderous'? I myself think not... Spinodontosaurus (talk) 19:50, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. That statement needs evidence to back it up. Perhaps we should add a  tag to that part. Chris 17:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It does need a source, but it's not incorrect. Note that it says more ponderous. Certainly T. rex was heavier and less spry than the much lighter-built Gigantoraptor. MMartyniuk (talk) 15:09, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you're saying, it's certainly not incorrect. Should I add the tag anyways? Chris (talk) 17:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, why don't we trying toying around with a different wording? Perhaps describing Tarbosaurus as being larger and therefore less agile, instead of calling it "ponderous?" While it technically is more "ponderous" than Gigantoraptor, I think that term gives the impression that Tarbosaurus was a slow and cumbersome animal. Chris (talk) 02:03, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Heavens no, T. rex can never be referred to as anything other than awesome, and he can never be portrayed in a negative light. The King must not be de-throned, that's the unwritten rule, right? -- Myrrdin_Wyllt 4/6/12  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.234.242.12 (talk) 15:24, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Well, an adult T.Rex (like "Sue"), certainly, but juveniles of the same size of an adult Gigantoraptor would have been very quick on their feet, and probably faster or as-fast.  And as far as the anon's comment above, getting science right is not the same as some sort of twisted dinosaur-worship you seem to think editors here have. HammerFilmFan (talk) 12:17, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really? 

message: I discovered this image and was wondering which environment Gigantoraptor lived in. Did it live in an arid, barren environment like in this image, or a humid environment like the one portrayed in the image in the article? Iainstein (talk) 02:27, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In any case, the image in the article has higher res, and drawings don't blend too well with photos, so I think we should keep it. And it doesn't show the entire environment anyway, only a couple of trees. FunkMonk (talk) 06:22, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Are we sure that Xu et al. has received proper credit in this article?  I mean, perhaps he / they could have been mentioned a few hundred more times.  That is just ridiculous.  Mention someone once, and then move on.  That's what the reference tags are for.  There is no need to keep mentioning a researcher time and time again throughout an article.  It breaks the flow of the article and makes it more difficult to focus on the subject, which is the Gigantoraptor, not the researcher(s).  I'm sure they would disagree.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.39.86 (talk) 02:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xu et al.
Talk:Kansas City Chiefs statistics

message: Per WP:NOT#STATS, as stats page is a long list that needs to be cut down into a selective merge into team page. Wikipedia is not in favor of trivia as first part of stats page demonstrates. --UWMSports (talk) 19:07, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely yes! RC-0722 361.0/1 20:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge indeed. --GoHuskies9904 (Talk) 17:12, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So should we be bold and merge? RC-0722 361.0/1 02:23, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged twice already, but its been reverted by the user that created the article. I think consensus is pretty clear though merging is the best idea. --UWMSports (talk) 03:01, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So we merge. Will you do the honors? RC-0722 361.0/1 20:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Will do, don't be shocked if the creator reverts the merge again, but we have a consensus here to back up the move this time. --UWMSports (talk) 23:32, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Wood-pulp paper

message: When it comes to the establishment of paper mills, the first paper mills in Europe began production in the early 12th century in Spain, and spread to Italy by the 14th Century. The first groundwood paper mill in the United States was established in 1867 in Massachusetts.  The information that is lacking is whether or not these paper mills recycled.  It is assumed that linen was continuously recycled because of its limited availabily, but it cannot be assumed with such a degree of confidence that paper made from trees, which were considered a seemingly unlimited resource, were routinely recycled.
Were wood-pulp books routinely returned or sold to publishers or paper manufacturers for recycling?  If these materials were returned to publishers, who returned them? Was the material returned by upper-class citizens, lower-class citizens, or private book dealers? Or was the recycling of paper solely paper manufacturers reusing their own unusable products? Or were publishers recycling their misprinted sheets, loose leaves, bulk scraps bought from printers, and mass-produced unwanted, unsold reading material and writing material?
Epoirier 17:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 19th Century Wood-pulp paper Recycling

message: *Support to Paper. The article on Paper will benefit from the working-in of this material. Itsmejudith (talk) 14:51, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have merged it onto wood pulp, paper and kraft process--Langbein Rise (talk) 10:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Mark F. "Thor" Hearne

message: Why is this being redirected and the original article not displayed? 
:Because of an email action. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 03:09, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The politically motivated removal of this article and its replacement by a redirect has brought Wikipedia into disrepute, per www.Slate.com at [At www.Slate.com  where there was a recent discussion of the editing of Wikipedia to remove reference to the American Center for Voting Rights in this article about the lawyer Mark "Thor" Hearne, who worked for various Republican candidates, including the Bush-Cheney campaign. See "Implausible Deniability. The Internet foils fudging by three "voter fraud" warriors." by Richard L. Hasen Posted Wednesday, June 13, 2007, at 5:31 PM ET article.  According to , persons from his law firm have been editing Wikipedia to remove information about American Center for Voting Rights from his web page. Then it was restored  then it was removed again  by someone at an IP address that was said to be from his law firm per . The preceding information is non-libellous , fully sourced, and in full accord with WP:BLP. He has also been written up in the St. Louis Post Dispatch online edition at  Edison 22:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is more discussion of the article deletion. The discussion basically boiled down to: "I'm an administrator. Now go away." — goethean ॐ 22:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Headless Horseman (disambiguation)

message: I recently removed some simple vanity vandalism from this article using the Undo function. Before committing the edit, I further removed a spam paragraph that had been in the prior version - a link to a motorcycle tour of the surrounding area - that had been pasted into this and a few other tangentially-related articles by 67.80.205.24. I now note that the use of the Undo facility has concealed that additional removal in the edit history, which may be a bug in Undo deserving further investigation. Consider this full disclosure of the edit. - toh 21:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

message: There are other headless horsemen in various local lores, including one from central Missouri associated with the massacre of Mormon farmers at Haun's Mill. It has been recorded by the folklorists Austin and Alta Fife in an interview with an informant in Hamilton, Missouri in 1946. Might be worth mentioning that the motif is found outside of literature. --King ravana (talk) 22:51, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other headless horsemen in folklore
Talk:List of MSX emulators

message: The motivation for this article was to keep the main MSX article shorter. It's not meant to be just another "list" article. Loudenvier 17:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article may need a cleanup though, it currently reads like a bunch of advertisements --Apathor 08:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was partly inspired by the List of Nintendo Entertainment System emulators, but it also helps to keep the main article less cluttered. And it has the additional advantage that now it's possible to add categories to the article.Mahjongg 10:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Apathor is correct! A nice cleanup will make this really encyclopedic, when it was inside the MSX article no one bothered because that article itself is greatly encyclopedic, but as its own, we will have to be more careful with this list. Mahjongg already gave us a nice hint: categories, we can keep the emulators in categories (Open source, commercial, official) and then we can discuss about MSX emulation itself, and who knows, we can even MOVE the article to MSX emulation and be more technical. Who knows? Loudenvier 14:56, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, the List of Nintendo Entertainment System emulators itself gives a good example how to make this article more encyclopedic, (with tables etc.) thats why I mentioned it. Mahjongg 11:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Article has been rewritten inspired from that list. It contained a lot of non-NPOV text, that was removed. Please don't use the "Notes" section for that, like saying it's the best emulator, or bragging about features. Correct me if I've made any mistakes with the rewrite. It needs to be updated every once in a while with new emulator updates. --Apathor 17:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes its much better now, although it might benefit from a small NPOV introduction to what emulating an MSX means. Mahjongg 10:43, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motivation