Talk:Frieza

message: can someone please explain to me how he died in 764 A.D. ???
This makes absolutely no sense  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hairybeast92 (talk • contribs) 00:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh lord, I'm getting the feeling that these date are causing an uproar with folks who just don't understand what their all about. The dates are sourced in the seventh Dragon Ball Daizenshu source book or data book titled Dragon Ball Encyclopedia. In that book, a timeline was presented which feature a detailed account of all the milestones up to that point within the Dragon Universe. Featuring dates of each event that occurred. Some of the events come with full a date, others only feature a small portion. The timeline like the rest of the source book and that series was written with note supplied creator Akira Toriyama, for which he is given full writing credit for. Within the timeline, each of the dates are listed as three digit years and the initials A.D.. Yet it does "not" specify that the calender is in correlation with the Christian calendar or that the A.D. featured is Anno Domini. It is best left that the society of the Dragon Universe uses a different calendar system. As in the real world the Christian calender in not the only calender in this world. Their are the Hebrew calendar which state this year is 5769, and the Muslim calendar that depict this year as 1430 AH. Then again the calender might be influenced by either the Chinese or Buddhist calenders. I'm not going on a limb to make the claim. After the debue of Dragon Ball GT two corisponding source books were released that featured an updated timeline, also by Toriyama, which included past events connected to GT and some future events. Virtuly every fansite that has featured the timeline copied the information from those books. Although, since alot of the information is in Japanese, some dates might not match or sync with others. Sarujo (talk) 03:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What you have to understand, Hairybeast, is that Dragonball Z takes place in a separate universe where a dog is king and dinosaurs are not extinct. Take Star Wars for example, it says "a long time ago" and yet it has futuristic technology. 24.65.126.227 (talk) 16:31, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be noted that A.D. is wrong, however.  The Daizenshuu time line does not use that abbreviation, or any for that matter.  Dates in the time line are referred to simply as 'Age'.  Something that has been continued with Dragonball Online and it's date of occurrence being Age 1,000.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.164.91.169 (talk) 18:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

text: I will 72.2.160.170 (talk) 18:37, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death??? 

message: Is there not a more technical/appropriate term than "bad mofo"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.147.170 (talk) 14:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a quote from the source article, it's the only term they used. Bad mofo should not be a problem if it was a quote from another person that helps build the nobility of a character. Now if one of us had used it as an original description then it would be inappropriate. If you have a problem with it's use them take it up with Ramsey Isler of IGN. Sarujo (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Bad Mofo" sounds very unprofessional and inappropriate for an encyclopedia article, unless you are directly quoting someone. The current paragraph is not in the form of a quote. It would be better if it was said that the character is known for his sadism, ruthlessness and Machiavellian tendencies than for being a bad mofo.PiccoloNamek (talk) 21:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But bad mofo is in quotes meaning that the word is taken from the source, the IGN article. Sarujo (talk) 22:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I'm with Sarujo. If that's what the citation uses, then there's no problem in using it in this article's context. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:03, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Sigh, many people does "not" mean every living person on the face of this planet. It means a reasonalble amount of people. Which could be large or small. Sarujo (talk) 02:09, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

text: As far as I was concerned, that was my answer. My comment was not intended as "smart", and I don't appreciated you referring it as such. That how the complant is comming off, that the line is misrepresenting the statment as everybody. I gave a genuine reply to your statement on the matter.  But since you are so insistent of a more direct answer, here goes. Isler, like many critics, is a journalist. And as a journalist, he represents a percentage of a demographic share the same opinion as him. In this case the folks that are highly critical that Dragon Ball Z is an imperfect machine. People like Isler, simply say what the average Joes and Janes out there can't say. You may not see it that way, but that is what they do. Just because he was the only person, as I write, that has gone on record to that term to describe Frieza, doesn't prove that he is the only person in this world that has used that term. I hate use this phrase but, "The absence of evidence is not evidence of absence". You can't simply say that the term is limited to him, just because he was the only person who made the statment in the media. Sarujo (talk) 01:46, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... 

message: I don't think it is really encyclopediac.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chucky Jenkins of Geneva (talk • contribs) 19:57, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is yet to be completed. Sincerely Subzerosmokerain (talk) 02:12, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Yes. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 23:51, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Reception Section

message: I'm questioning how notable Frieza is. There really isn't any reception in this article besides something that's slightly in-universe - in that it's a comparison of a VA's quality to another VA's. Regardless, is there anything more to say about Frieza? Seems that most of the article is just a plot summary to me. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 10:56, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He's the main villain of Dragonball Z. Or he's one of the three main villains. (I'm not counting Vegeta, since he switches sides in the Namek Saga, or Garlic Jr., since he only appeared in one saga, while Frieza appeared in four (and it took Goku 19 episodes to defeat him), not counting the Saiyaman and Kid Buu Sagas when he's dead, Cell appeared in three (five if you count the Saiyaman and Kid Buu Sagas when he's dead), and Buu (counting both Majin Buu and Evil/Super/Kid Buu) appeared in three. Also there are only 10 episodes in the Garlic Jr. Saga, and Garlic Jr. is defeated in the ninth. Ghostkaiba297 (talk) 16:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but that just means that heis important to Dragon Ball Z, which would violate WP:SYNTH if it was argued that an important aspect of an important subject is important to the real world. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 22:14, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you also have to take into account Frieza's cultural significance. As seen in "other media," Frieza has appeared and been referenced in several forms of media outside of Dragon Ball Z. Moreover, the "reception" article shows how Frieza has been received by both critics and fans. Seems fairly "real world" to me. I wouldn't consider the comparison of voice actors to be "in-universe" at all, either. That's clearly a real-world production issue.--Gokitalo (talk) 09:08, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 

message: I know his name is derived from the fruit "Kiwi", but I've seen the English episodes and Frieza, Vegeta, Zarbon, and Dodoria all refer to him as "Cui". (The closed-captions spell his name "Kewie", but they also spell Krillin "Crillen" and Kami "Commy", when both are confirmed to be "Krillin" and "Kami" in the titles. Also, it calls Ginyu "Ginew" in the episode "Arrival of the Ginyu Force".) So do the games and the Dragonball Wiki. I don't think some people (coughkahlannightwingcough) have seen those episodes or played the games, and it got her thinking that his name was Kiwi. So if you don't mind, I'll be changing it to Cui. Ghostkaiba297 (talk) 16:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cui 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
	Speedy deletions at commons tend to take longer than they do on Wikipedia, so there is no rush to respond. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:24, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Frieza.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hi goku 41.13.74.90 (talk) 11:55, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi goku 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Shouldn't this be called Freeza not the incorrect funi spelling? WaWe here (talk) 15:58, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the RM above, Frieza is more commonly used by English-language sources, which does appear to be the case based on comparing the two via Google. That it's not the right way to spell it is an issue that the sources themselves have (if it is indeed an issue), the Wikipedia article is simply reflecting what is most commonly used. - Aoidh (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freeza? 

message: I think Goku is a girl because Bardock must have changed his gender so he could be a proud Saiyan warrior 62.74.58.213 (talk) 09:07, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goku must be trans