lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Europa (1991 film)

message: The name of this film is "Europa". Is there a Wikipedia policy on using alternate titles as article titles if the original is not the same as the one for the American market? If not, this film should be referred to as "Europa" and the article should have that title [or "Europa (film)"].—Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.136.42.118 (talk • contribs) 
:The policy is to always use the English title. I'm not sure in this case, because as far as I know it was released as "Europa" in UK. Zentropa is the name of LvT's production company, so we might have to disambiguate. --Maitch 08:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The recent DVD rerelease in Australia is called "Europa". Apparently the original title was changed in some regions to avoid confusion with the film "Europa Europa", which had come out just before. "Europa" was the orginal title, the title the director intended, and the title under which it was released in some regions. Therefore I think this article should be renamed. - Eyeresist 05:18, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I support a move to Europa (film). --Maitch 15:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change article name? 

message: Jour_de_fête came out decades before Europa and it was black-and-white with bits of colour as well. Why is Schindler's List even mentioned? JeR (talk) 03:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Schindler's List is widely and wrongly believed to be the first film to ever use such an effect. It's clearly not a coincidence (as Lars von Trier mentions on his DVD commentary for this film). Spielberg, on the basis of this film, tried to lure LvT to Hollywood. (He failed, since LvT is scared of modes of transport he doesn't personally control and hence can't get overseas.) But... on Spielberg's very next film, he "borrowed" LvT's stylistic device for his own film, and it has become unjustly associated with Spielberg rather than LvT. So that's why that is mentioned here. Lontano (talk) 09:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Also, I believe Jour de fête's hand-coloured inserts were (according to the WP article) only incorporated because the technical colour-process Tati was relying on became unavailable. Though he wanted the entire film to be shown in colour, he couldn't hand-colour every single frame of a feature-length film. In fact, its recent re-release went back to the original colour negative for the whole film... so no more "brief bursts of colour". Lontano (talk) 09:13, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two years before Schindler's List? 

message: Hello, shouldn't there be a line on the page something like "Not to be confused with" since the title is very similar to Europa Europa? I don't usually do much on wikipedia, but thought it might be a good idea to inform those who do. --78.70.255.43 (talk) 18:46, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Check the second paragraph of the lead section, it's already there. Smetanahue (talk) 18:55, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Europa Europa 

message: There is also the cameo appeareance of LvT as "Jew".
Shouldn't we include this info?
Nodurosul (talk) 18:34, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cameo
Talk:Epidemic (film)

message: Just added the plot what do you think?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grieverk (talk • contribs) 15:35, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot
Talk:Birthday Girl (2001 film)

message: Birthday Girl was also the title of a feature-length TV drama, starring Sarah Lancashire in the title role of Rachel Jones, who had leukaemia on and off but tried not to let it spoil her celebrations.  I've found this IMDb page; can we find enough info on it to write an article here? -- Smjg (talk) 01:12, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A different Birthday Girl 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – MaterialWorks 11:21, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 June 2023
Talk:Young Winston

message: Are there not several versions of the ending?
I think once I saw a version which ended with a cut to an older WSC on the balcony with the Royal Family on VE Day (actual newsreel footage from 1945).
Another time (autumn 1997 iirc) they showed a version on telly which ended with his famous "dream" story, in which he dreamed his father's ghost visited him in his studio and assumed his scapegrace son to have become a painter ("Make a living at it, do you?"), then WSC is left chuckling, having not had the heart to tell his bullying father that he had become Prime Minister.Paulturtle (talk) 10:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

message: The film rights for My Early Life were originally sold to Warner Brothers during the Second World War; it's a long and complicated journey from there to Carl Foreman and Columbia Pictures. Lough's book No More Champagne tells much of the story. Mackensen (talk) 17:48, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production 

message: It might be worth checking the film again on this point.  In reality he escaped by way of Portuguese East Africa.  Does the film clarify this, or does it imply that the freight train crossed directly from Boer-held territory into British-held territory?  This would be very unusual in wartime. PatGallacher (talk) 15:01, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 1 hr 55 mins in, when he is hiding down the coalmine, we have a voiceover from the older Winston (so presumably quoting from "My Early Life") saying that he was take a train into Portuguese territory and from thence a ship back to British territory. The Portuguese colonies were much in the news in the early 1970s so I dare say the existence of Mozambique would not have required further explanation to the reasonably well-informed viewer.Paulturtle (talk) 03:44, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Escape
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/American politicians

message: I created at Joseph Cilley (senator) page and it is linked to his father Joseph Cilley and corrected the links that I found. I will leave it to someone who is maintaining this list to remove the links and notes when and if they decied to. Good Luck and getting all these written! Marc29th 18:22, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I finished this up. – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 13:04, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

message: It seems to me that this page should be split into subpages. Any objections? – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 13:04, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting

message: I would appreciate some help finding out how many politicians under each category have been listed thusfar. I did my best guess for the senators looking at the list before it was split, but I would like someone more familiar to help fill in the other info.  Thanks! --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 18:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the Representatives list is not actually complete yet, so it's a tricky situation: many have been done before there's a starting count. What to do? – Quadell (talk) (bounties) 20:28, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine, but when the list(s) are complete could you let me know so that I can go back through the logs and estimate a starting value.  --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 17:21, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starting number
Talk:Tony Brown

message: Please add these back when articles are present or anticipated:
=== Red-links ===
*Tony Brown (educator), an American educator and corporate executive
----
Curious- American talk show host, author,dean of Scripps/Howard School of Journalism at Hampton U., and speaker; hosts Tony Brown's Journal on PBS (20 years running. Entry?
:I have created a link to Tony Brown (journalist) for him - if you could contribute anything, that would be great. I know nothing about him other than what I can Google for. --Stormie 13:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removals and reasons 

message: *Tony Brown (educator), an American educator and corporate executive
----
Curious- American talk show host, author,dean of Scripps/Howard School of Journalism at Hampton U., and speaker; hosts Tony Brown's Journal on PBS (20 years running. Entry?
:I have created a link to Tony Brown (journalist) for him - if you could contribute anything, that would be great. I know nothing about him other than what I can Google for. --Stormie 13:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red-links
Talk:63rd Golden Globe Awards nominees

message: Wouldn't it be better to call this page "63rd Golden Globe Awards" (and ditto for all past and future years)?  Then it could list the nominees before the event, and the actual results afterwards.  This would also be in line with the Oscars; see eg. 78th Academy Awards. — Johan the Ghost seance 18:37, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a valid idea.  I created this article (that is, I wrote the list of nominees when they came out last December) having the 77th Academy Awards nominees article as a guide.  This format was the one used for this kind of listing.  When I wrote the original version, we already had the final five for the award ceremony (the nominees).  The article on the 78th Oscars is still reflecting the longlist — which I believe is something new for this kind of article.  I don't suppose the longlist is going to be deleted once the nominees are announced, so I see how this new format works there.  Since here we don't have the longlist, but rather just the five nominees for each category, maybe this format is sufficient.Also, I'm thinking that if we named the article "63rd Golden Globe Awards", it could give the impression that there's more in here than a simple list of nominees (and winners in bold), which there isn't.  Maybe it's just semantics, but rather than calling the article obsolete, I'd prefer to think that it is now "definitive", in the sense that there is nothing new of relevance to be included (something rare for a Wikipedia article).I would not oppose a format change that could make the article better though, so maybe we could have more users pitch in here?  Regards, Redux 19:12, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page now obsolete! 

message: Guys, this page move makes no sense.  The article was named as the praxis for this kind of article (see 77th Academy Awards nominees).  And the name is accurate: the article is a list of nominees with the winners in bold.  It is not an article about the winners.  I would have appreciated a previous discussion about this too.  Regards, Redux 03:39, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *I completely agree. Just because the winners have been announced already doesn't change the fact that the page is still a list of nominees, and should remain a list of nominees. Maelwys 11:38, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, guys!  I guess I just kind of thought that one page for each edition of the awards would be appropriate, but there's clearly a clear plan working here.  Happy editing! — Johan the Ghost seance 11:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, it's been renamed ... yeah, I guess I'm with the "don't move"-ers now. Johan the Ghost seance 11:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I can move it back.  And I can see where Johan is coming from, but...er..it's just that there isn't much to be said about a particular edition of the Award, other than listing the nominees and, as an extra, bolding the winners (which "announces" them).  Information about the Golden Globes in general should be, and is, at the specific article.  Regards, Redux 12:25, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move?
Talk:Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.

message: Besides the lead, the article has one, long block of page labeled 'history'.  In order to make more coherent structure, it should be broken down into subtopics like 'Background', 'Supreme Court Ruling', 'Precedents', etc.
--Tateharsh (talk) 22:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Organization

message: What was the eventual outcome after the case was remanded?  Tempshill 18:38, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the nature of the settlement still secret?   Has anybody close to the action made a comment yet?   216.99.198.72 (talk) 08:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Eventual outcome

message: Please procedd with merging these two pages. Design 13:03, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Merger

message: At the top, the sentence "That money is made does not make it impossible for a use to be fair; it is merely one of the components of a fair use analysis." appears. The first part of the sentence (before the semicolon) appears to be grammatically ambiguous, and I can't even figure out what it's trying to say.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.38.89.214 (talk) 14:56, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you prefer a comma after "made"?   If you added a comma, it would read:   That money is made, does not make it impossible for a use to be fair[.]    The only difficulty here is the first four words being a dependent clause, and this serves as a subject to the verb does.   The word order, if that is your complaint, is not so unusual that you, a native speaker of English, would never have seen it before.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.99.198.72 (talk) 08:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammatically questionable
Talk:SIMH

message: All of the information on the page is based on information from the SIMH official site, which was listed in external links. I fail to see how it's "not verified". TimP 18:38, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Reading the guidelines on verifiability (see link in the "not verified" box) I think the issue might be there under the heading "Self-published sources (online and paper)". The reviewer is probably considering the SIMH home page self-published by Bob Supnik. I've added a few selected links, perhaps that will help.Ferritecore 01:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Any system with a standard-conforming C implementation should be suitable.  The only intended OS dependence is found in optional support for Ethernet peripheral emulation.  Phil Budne and I also have graphic device emulation, e.g. VT11, that requires X11 or Windows, but that's not yet part of the official SIMH distribution.  Some people have implemented graphic interfaces for control panels with SIMH serving as a behind-the-scenes compute engine, but that's not part of the official SIMH distribution. — DAGwyn 158.12.36.83 (talk) 22:43, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As of 20 November 2015, and probably for some time before that, some version (possibly not the latest) of the Budne/Gwyn display support was added to the GIT-Hub repository, which seems to be the current home for this project.  — DAGwyn  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.121.204.138 (talk) 16:34, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I want you to pay some attention in the modified MIT License the project uses. It has a limitation of liability and prohibits to advertise only for/with the name of Robert M Supnik. That means that this is, legally speaking, not the same license for any other author. That violates the Open Source Definition in criterion 7 and I'm quite sure it makes it non-free software, as well. It reads like: I'm a contributor, come and sue me. I really wish people would stop to try to be smarter than they are. --Trac3R (talk) 09:52, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Uhm, how does this differ from, for example, the BSD license?  "Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission." -- the same thing.  Also, no distribution has any problems with this license, including purist ones like Debian.  I'll remove this section.KiloByte (talk) 11:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  License 

message: There should be a brief description of how the emulator operates, including the language(s) used in its implementation. Also, a rough rule of thumb should be given about its efficiency or effective speed ("emulation burden"). Has there been any reporting on this project in the mainstream or technical press, other than the 1996 DTJ publication?  Reify-tech (talk) 20:17, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing information
Talk:London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

message: I'm sorry about the to-and-fro edits and the bloody mess in the history. In brief, I felt that per MOS:AMP the ampersand was in this case correct. I set about reinstating it then realized what a Royal PITA™ it was going to be ... I think it's when I started to look at the category that the horror dawned. I gave up and put everything back. Life's too short. I'd support the move but I'm not planning any more work on it myself. Sorry for the mess, best to all, DBaK (talk) 10:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruption – apologies
Talk:Saint Paul Winter Carnival

message: The "Coolest Place on Earth" section and the "Legend" section are direct copies of the text from the Winter Carnival website. Is this a violation of copyright, or is the text licensed for this? -- Mjwilco 18:41, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The legend is actually a standard wrting that has long aged out of a copyright. All material about the Winter Carnival (a registered non-profit) uses this information. Aethos 03:06, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Vio?
Talk:Battered woman syndrome

message: I don't see the information about victims of domestic abuse in gay relationship. Does it exist in RS?Reprarina (talk) 02:31, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heterocentrism 

message: Is there anywhere on the internet that we can go and talk to others who have been battered? I find that discussing one's problem with another who was in the same situation has proved to be beneficial. 
Can anyone answer the question?
Thanks so much for your time.
Cher. 70.27.88.182 (talk) 23:57, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  We Need a Forum or newsfeed.  

message: ICD-9 is not the current version in use, ICD-11 went into use in 2022. References to ICD-9 should be replaced with appropriate references to ICD-11. I believe this syndrome would fall under ICD-11 code PJ20&XE454. 47.215.136.236 (talk) 04:37, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICD-9 is outdated, update to ICD-11
Talk:Neusis construction

message: This article is a translation from my contribution to the Dutch wikipedia. I may have translated wrongly two technical terms, viz.:
*guiding line (?) = directrix (?). In German this is called "Leitlinie";
*catch line (?). The German equivalent is "Fanglinie".
I will be grateful for any corrections! Hans van Deukeren
There are  difficulties with this article
*It implies that Archimedes, when neusis was popular, was before Plato, when its popularity waned. 
*It ignores the difference between pure and applied mathemetics.
*It therefore omits the clear reason Euclid confined himself to compass and straightedge: they are the only tools whose behavior was described in his axioms, and therefore the only ones about which he could prove anything. Septentrionalis 00:02, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Is it correct to call l and m "lines"?  I think that to a mathematician "line" means infinitely extending straight line.  Aren't l and m more properly called curves? 86.132.223.101 (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lines? 

message: The pole can simply be considered a pivot as with the usual compass. The explanation of the neusis is vague, but it appears that you want an adjustable length, yet movable line segment with a bull's eye centered on the directrix. You would put a writing utensil on the center bull's eye to produce desired geometric construction. For the life of me I cannot find an actual physical neusis. We may have to build our own.
Important to note, absolutely anything you can rotate where you can fix one point in space, and place a writing utensil at the fixed radius can serve as a compass for all intents and purposes. Draftsmen likely recall there are superior compass designs that don't require gouging the writing surface at all as with the traditional compass.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakewayd (talk • contribs) 00:41, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlapping Properties with a Compass and Straight Edge
Talk:Akira Machida

message: *Akira Machida (町田 顯) (born October 16 1939) is the current Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Japan.
*On October 15, 2006, Akira Machida will be forced to retire upon reaching the age of 60.
If he was born in 1939, he turned 60 in 1999.  He'll be 67.  The retirement statement is also an entry under future events on the 2006 page.
Sorry, I made two typographical errors when I wrote this article. He was born in 1936 according to the sources I used, and the mandatory retirement age in Japan is 70. I added another link to another news article, because old ones are now registration only. Adniel 00:22, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  60? 
Talk:Panama Hattie

message: The article needs a plot summary to move up to "start" class.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:26, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I will do a plot, perhaps tomorrow, depends on the weather. I can not decide whether there should be a separate article for the film, will think on it. JeanColumbia (talk) 21:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: The name of the second song Lena Horne performs in the film is "The Sping," not "The Spring."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Msbailey (talk • contribs) 04:03, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Adaptations
Talk:Fettes Brot

message: I had assumed this title was a parody of "Auf einem Augenblick", but "Auf einem Auge blind" has been suggested instead. I didn't know about this phrase, but in the places I can find it (just poking around), it looks like it is equivalent to the English expression "to turn a blind eye". I'm thinking it might be better to translate this title as "To turn a dumb eye" instead of "Dumb on one eye", as it would probably more accurately convey the meaning of the title. Any thoughts? - Rainwarrior 18:47, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Auf einem Auge blind" means "blind in one eye," making the best translation "dumb in one eye."  Having lived in Germany for some time, I'm nearly positive that this is the pun they intended.  Doctor Love 06:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I certainly like it better than "dumb on one eye". It's a bit awkward in literal translation like that, I think. From the usage I'd seen "blind in one eye" in German is usually used to accuse someone of ignoring some of the facts, isn't it? Whereas in English, usually the phrase takes its literal meaning of actually being blind. (Should we make a note about this, similar to how we have explained "Am Wasser Gebaut" in the article?) This was why I suggested "to turn a dumb eye" as a less literal alternative, but possibly closer to the spirit of the title. Also, I'm thinking that the English word "dumb" also has the meaning of "silent" which isn't at all the meaning of "blöd"; wouldn't a word like "stupid" or "silly" be better? - Rainwarrior 10:21, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not familiar with any German idiomatic usage of "blind in one eye."  I agree with you about the ambiguity of "dumb," though, which should probably be changed to "stupid." Doctor Love 15:59, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auf einem Auge Blöd 

message: It is a very obscure word, it seems, but the meaning I think is correct, and I don't think it should be removed. See this discussion. - Rainwarrior 18:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mitschnacker 

message: This article is littered with literal translations of german locutions that don't make any sense whatsoever in english. Someone should have a look at this; I'd do it myself, but are to drunk to do so right now...82.10.181.252 23:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German locution 