lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:When I Survey the Wondrous Cross

message: I'm glad to hear that the use of the hymn by the BBC (Radio 4) to introduce its 7am broadcast on Good Friday morning, is still continuing. (Do many other major broadcasters use it similarly?) Though the way it is introduced ('and now for a verse of a traditional Easter hymn') is a bit lacking! Linuxlad 09:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Use by [[BBC]] on [[Good Friday]] morning

message: I question whether "Easter songs" is an appropriate category for this hymn. The lyrics are all about the Passion, not at all the Resurrection, and in my breviary it is used for Evening Prayer throughout Lent and during Holy Week. I'll remove it from the Easter cat, absent objection. Carl.bunderson (talk) 06:16, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Easter category

message: This may not be the right place to discuss this, but I ended up reading the article because I was utterly flabbergasted as to how the second stanze is supposed to rhyme. How is one to pronounce either "God" or "blood" for this to make any sense. I trust it may be some historical or regional pronunciation of either, but I would very much appreciate it if someone could point out the solution to this obviously bewildering bit. And if I am not entirely off track here, perhaps this should be addressed in the article itself as well.
Avichai~dewiki (talk) 23:07, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Rhyme in the second stanza
Talk:Watership Down

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Fiver(WatershipDown) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 22#Fiver(WatershipDown) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 05:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fiver(WatershipDown)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Shouldn't the prologue be added to the plot summary? I have a feeling that it should be included... Visokor (talk) 19:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prologue addition?
Talk:Survivor (franchise)

message: Who hosted the Russian version in season 6? It's not in the list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.170.101.54 (talk) 21:25, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian Host 

message: This has probably already been hashed out before, but is there any major difference between the U.S.-market Survivor logo and the earlier non-U.S.-market versions?  I'm American, and remember reading back in 2001 when it "started" the reality-TV "craze" in the U.S. (it seemed to me that it started then at least).  I didn't know that the Swedish version was the first to actually make it to TV though.  It seems like a non-U.S. logo might be more appropriate for this article, since there is already another article on the U.S. version specifically. Jimw338 (talk) 02:03, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different logo for original British/Swedish version 

message: What happened to the "Arab World" Survivor? It disappeared from the international versions list? I seem to recall that one being real since I saw a video of the opening credits... Shadow2 (talk) 10:02, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arabic version? 

message: For instance "Conspiring to split winnings will result in immediate expulsion from the game." This is clearly allowed in the Blood vs. Water seasons, where Husband and Wife couples are legally obligated by most marriage laws to have community property on any and all winnings associated with the game, and explicitly saying they are playing for the same money to share.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theo chemist 1116 (talk • contribs) 03:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some Rules Don't Make Sense 

message: I don't think this article adequately reflects the Survivor franchise, because it almost exclusively discusses the US version, with other versions relegated to a "variations" section.  Including the original Swedish version.
This wouldn't be so bad if this was indicated in each section, but in everything said it is almost assumed that the reader understands it's only talking about the US version.
Since there is already a Survivor (American_TV_series) article, couldn't most of this detail be removed or moved there? --Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franchise not American 
Talk:Indic

message: Indic is an appellation that describes the entire East Indies and not merely South Asia; it is bad science and extremely foolish to confuse Indic with Indo-European languages! They are not synonymous! "Indic" descibes the composite cultural systems of the East Indies that arose as a result of the interactions of peoples of various races and ethnic stocks and with the Indo-European, and more specifically Hindu and Sanskritic, cultural influences predominanting, more in South Asia, and less, but still distinctive enough to be recognized and admitted, in South-East Asia. Please make a correction, by demerging etc. WikiSceptic 07:58, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad [[Indology]]
Talk:Mer de Glace

message: Although "Sea of Ice" is the English name, "Mer de Glace" is more common even in English publications (or at least in the ones that are in my personal library :-) ). Stan 05:15, 31 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Sea of Ice

message: the two pictures clearly show  the  extent  of the  ice  is  greater today  than  in 1870. 47.201.182.47 (talk) 15:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: More Ice today than in 1870

message: Someone please update this 47.151.140.190 (talk) 05:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The glacier has not gone, but it has significantly receded. We only change articles based upon Reliable Sources. In future, please cite links to them when you recommend alterations. Thank you. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:36, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This glacier is gone today 9/10/22
Talk:Sing Pao Daily News

message: What purpose does that long green animated picture serve? RickK 06:13, 31 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there are a lot of articles of newspapers of Hong Kong are written by Gp[number][name]s. Look like from the same group somewhere, maybe the staff of that company? ;P --FallingInLoveWithPitoc 06:48, 31 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they're the students of User:Fuzheado.  RickK 20:09, 1 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow...! :O --FallingInLoveWithPitoc 01:08, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Line-replaceable unit

message: Removed a line saying that LRUs are commonly referred to as black boxes.  If anyone can source that it can go back in but I think it's wrong.  Black boxes are LRUs, LRUs are not black boxes. 208.78.72.18 (talk)
---  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.78.72.18 (talk) 16:50, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

message: Orbit Replaceable Units (ORUs) are mentioned in the article, but I'm not sure they match the current definition of items repaired at the organizational level.  I would imagine support echelons for space stations would include ground support, and also spares inventory for unreliable parts on the station itself, but I'm not sure how these would map into the traditional USAF organizational, field, and depot support levels.  As always, citations help to gain perspective.  70.251.149.197 (talk) 18:54, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orbit Replaceable Units 

message: Since ATRs are a type of LRU shouldn't they be listed under this article?  I don't see any reference to ATRs in the LRU article.  Also, there are articles that reference ATRs, but there isn't a specific ATR article on Wikipedia.  I think it would be proper to direct the ATR links to the LRU article.  Any thoughts? KittyHawkFlyer (talk) 01:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Transport Rack (ATR)
Talk:Pumping lemma

message: Please note that the Hebrew interwiki is to an article concerning the "Pumping lemma for context-free languages", not a general article regarding pumping lemmas. 80.178.196.196 09:05, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Hebrew Interwiki in this article 

message: The intro needs to provide more context for nonspecialists. I presume this does not apply to human languages, but rather only to computer languages? If so, this should be stated clearly. If not, the introduction needs to be made clearer.--Srleffler 05:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added another link to computability theory.  The link to formal languages also gives context. CMummert 03:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Context?

message: I'm new to this topic, so let me know if I'm missing something.  Currently there are a few interesting but irrelevant sentences about pumping lemmas for finite languages.
The actual situation surely is that any finite language vacuously has a pumping lemma since there aren't any strings beyond a certain length, and so we can just choose a pumping length greater than the length of the longest word.  Alternatively, we could just note that any finite language is regular, and so has a pumping lemma.  Thus, as the person who added the "Correction:" section (though surely they should've corrected the text itself rather than just being lazy!) correctly noted, the claim in the first paragraph that "if there is a pumping lemma for a given language class, any nonempty language in the class will contain an infinite set of finite strings" is wrong.  However, the second paragraph in "Correction:" is missing the point.  It's true that for non-context free AND non-regular languages, a pumping lemma implies (non-trivial) languages are infinite, but only vacuously, since there are no non-regular finite languages - the fact there is a pumping lemma is irrelevant.
Anyway, I think the best thing to do is delete the sentence in the first paragraph (which was always tangential - it's not a significant fact to do with the pumping lemma), and delete the "Correction:" section too.  I've now done that.  I personally don't think any mention needs to be made of finite languages on this page. -- Bluegrass 00:12, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Finite languages

message: I propose that this page have its information merged with Pumping lemma for regular languages, since it has the same mathematical theory and has no real distinction. There are useful details in both articles, and they discuss exactly the same thing.
Koryu Obihiro (talk) 00:40, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge 

message: A previous version of this article was once featured. For more info, see  Wikipedia talk:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations#A few articles have been disambiguated  czar 04:44, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Once featured
Talk:Jack Dempsey

message: I think the footnotes section can be merged into the references. Quotes of what is summarized/paraphrased in the article content are not necessary, they don't seem to add anything. MrBill3 (talk) 12:52, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnotes section not needed 
Talk:Pierre Poujade

message: Wouldn't Jose Bove be the real heir to the Poujadist tradition in French 
politics?
:Not really. Bové does not blame the parliamentary system, the "establishment", and "parasites" for high taxes etc. He only blames the economical system. Le Pen would probably be a better heir. David.Monniaux 11:14, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vaporeon

message: I think it needs some more, but I don't reallt know what to add, anybody have an idea? tell me how you like this, I'll work on the other 4...
This page really does need more.  What about this personality?  As far as I know, Vaporeon hasn't appeared in the anime, so that's out.  How to obtain a Vaporeon [though that is fairly obvious] is good.  I do recommend taking out the first-person references, though. SujinYH 15:21, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, each Vaporeon would have its own personality.  It would be kind of difficult for the writers to delve much into the personality of one Vaporeon unless it was a recurring character, such as Ash's Pikachu or Team Rocket's Meowth ... the only two Pokémon to appear in every episode aired in the U.S., I might add.  Well, Meowth wasn't in the first episode, but it's been in every episode since.  --Undrhil 01:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since becoming a redirect, this Pokemon appears to have gained popularity. Most notably it is being used by the Japanese government as a "Water Ambassador". I don't think this alone necessarily establishes notability, but it may be helpful should someone want to put a draft together for a proposed new article. --Mbrickn (talk) 05:09, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Events
Talk:Keir Hardie

message: I had to remove these sentences from article. 
'Interestingly, the speech's predictions would become completely true in time:'
'This xenphobic and racist attitude of Kier Hardie has not been publicised over the years. It is interesting that this wikipedia entry does not contain any facts on this controversial subject.'
The main article is not the place for adding what editor's might consider 'interesting'. Also citation of reliable sources needed if you are going to claim racist attitudes. Hurin333 (talk) 09:58, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia standards

message: This is far too uncritical. The tone is wrong - it reads to much like an authorised history and less like an encyclopedia article. Secretlondon 11:07, Oct 31, 2003 (UTC)
It *was* the first article I wrote here...
Also finding critical stuff on Hardie is very hard...
Alun Ephraim 16:33, 31 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose the intended meaning is "independent labour candidate", not "Independent Labour Party candidate". I am going to change it now. Nicke L 23:23, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: What is your point? Mattley (Chattley) 14:18, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Too uncritical

message: Seems very odd indeed that Wikipedia's article omits any mention of Hardie's vicious campaign against Baltic immigrants to the Lanarkshire coalfields.  Henry McLeish (former FM) and other biographers have gone into some detail on this topic, and reliable ext refs are not hard to come by. --Mais oui! (talk) 08:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hardie's anti-immigrant campaigning 

message: The area of Legbrannock has a sign saying that it is Keir Hardie's birthplace see here. This was a very small area in-between Holytown and Newhouse, we understand that it is not in Newhouse as the article cites. Does anyone have further information on this?RussellWBrown (talk) 15:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keir Hardie's birthplace 
Talk:Halloween

message: 72.219.98.108 (talk) 04:53, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: PLEASE 72.219.98.108 (talk) 04:53, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 05:06, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2023 

message: There is a fantasy and magical side to Halloween or in its longer version Hallowes Evening. The fantasy side are things like ghosts and spirits and magical creatures there, also what about goblins and skeletons that walk around in fantasy world. Also the magical side of Hallowes Evening are all the magicians some in general are witches, wizards, warlocks, fairies and sorcerers, they are all part of some of costume parties you see where ever people go to. Any more suggestions to this article? 2607:FEA8:9C65:C300:B4AB:69AC:7328:A47E (talk) 12:38, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The magical side of Hallows Eve 

message: Halloween I said up there is it’s modern title for it, but it’s also know as Hallows Eve or in its original languages it is Halelowes Evening. 2607:FEA8:9C65:C300:B4AB:69AC:7328:A47E (talk) 12:47, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Event title changes and source 

message: This article claims that Nov 1 was the date of "Lemuralia" on the Julian calendar. Historical sources indicate that this festival actually took place in the month of May in Rome. Therefore, this portion of the article should be removed. Source: https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/secondary/SMIGRA*/Lemuralia.html 2604:3D09:A07B:D800:61B8:DC1D:9846:EC9F (talk) 20:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Lemuralia
Talk:Military history of Poland during World War II

message: "contribution to World War II" is ambigious, it could also be read as "contribution to starting the war". How about renaming this to Polish contribution to Allies in World War II Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:17, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Polish contribution to Allied victory in World War 2? Marcelus (talk) 08:49, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Marcelus Sounds good. - GizzyCatBella🍁 13:00, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Fine with me too. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:08, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @GizzyCatBella @Marcelus @Piotrus Shouldn't the article title be more in line with how other similar articles are titled? Following the examples of Military history of the United Kingdom during World War II, Military history of the United States during World War II, Military history of France during World War II, I would suggest that this article should be called Military history of Poland during World War II, which is now only a redirect to History of Poland (1939–1945). Cukrakalnis (talk) 11:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good idea to consider too! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:52, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that’s a good idea also, even better. Thanks @Cukrakalnis - GizzyCatBella🍁 13:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Since I think we have an agreement here, I'll make a request at WR:RM for a technical move. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:21, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Piotrus, done! ─ The Aafī (talk) 03:42, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of this article
Talk:Come

message: It seems to me ... unfortunate, let us say, that nearly the entirety of the article on a pretty basic (not to say seminal) concept in life is on the vulgar meaning -- there's almost no mention of the non-sexual sense(s) of coming. --Calieber 15:48, Oct 31, 2003 (UTC)
Also - none of the pages that link to it are linking that that meaning. They seem to be referring to an old band. 193.131.186.150 15:49, 31 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: I propose that Cum be merged into Come. It looks like the word "cum" is within the scope the "Come" page. Alternatively we could reduce the scope "Come" page to not cover "cum" and move the "cum" content to the "Cum" page. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 18:51, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose this proposal. I think the differences between the words justify two separate pages for disambiguation purposes. bd2412 T 18:00, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

text: I also oppose this proposal, for the same reasons. Miscellanium (talk) 01:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I don't understand why the sexual slang bit was removed. As both seem to be common accepted spellings (with cum perhaps being more common although also sometimes seen as more vulgar and others using cum for the noun and come for verb), it should be covered in both articles or neither. Since both are disambigs, it makes little sense to prioritise one article over the other either so best just cover the same thing in both rather than redirecting the reader to one bearing in mind also we are not a dictionary. This is of course a different thing from covering stuff that only relate to cum here which I agree we shouldn't do and those removals were proper.  Nil Einne (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexual slang
Talk:Adenosine triphosphate

message: It seems odd that whilst mentioned in the introduction, the function of ATP in muscle contraction isn't mentioned in any depth Henry5040 (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ATP in muscle tissue 

message: — Assignment last updated by Biochem2024 (talk) 02:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 378
Talk:Receiver

message: * In satellite television, a set-top box. 
* On a telephone, the "receiver" is the handset, particularly the earpiece.
* In law, a receiver is a person appointed by a court to take into custody the property or funds of another party, pending litigation
* In communications and information processing, a receiver is the recipient (observer) of a message (information), which is sent from a source (object). Receivers decode messages.  
I removed these (after removing wikilinks per dab style) because they don't link to an article about the receiver they describe.  Maybe those articles should exist, but they don't, and WP:NOT a dictionary. Tedernst 21:54, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed 

message: This article seemingly fails to consider receivers used in radio telescopes.  They are important. In fact, I just fixed the article on Arno Penzias because it said the antenna was the key item, but the receiver got him the Nobel. 
Possibly a link to Radio Astronomy would suffice as a start, but that article has no details on receivers.  The antennas are the obvious attractant for the public, but they receivers (about which I know little) are important.  I hope someone fixes this - if you don't know how invite someone at Arecibo  or NRAO    or CSIRO  or the VLA  to do it. If you get the director, he can assign it to a publicity person. Carrionluggage 23:48, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too specialized 

message: Hello. What do editors think about adding the new article for software Citrix Receiver to the In technology category? The product is often simply referred to as Receiver both by the company and in the press. 
As a full disclosure, I have a financial conflict of interest and have been working on Citrix's behalf to suggest improvements to Citrix-related articles. I will not be making any edits here myself and ask that someone else add the article only if they think it's appropriate. Thanks! Heatherer (talk) 21:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems perfectly valid to me. I've added it. -- Fyrael (talk) 05:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citrix Receiver
Talk:Rock music in Germany

message: Well,
I added a list of German Rock bands, some of them are taken from the German "Deutschrock" Wikipedia article.
And, who knows why, somebody deleted this list. Sad.
A lot of the confusion about this page (as has already been suggested below) stems from the fact that "krautrock" refers to a specific stylistic genre of music, not just "music from Germany". Although the term was originally slightly derogatory, it has long since risen beyond this, and in the past 10 or 15 years, bands from all over the world have employed "krautrock" influences in their music, and referred to them as such.--feline1 13:35, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does Rammstein really belong into this article? If no then the section can be removed, otherwise it needs to be reworded a lot, as in it current state it's more like a praise of the band than an encyclopedic text. Not counting the misspelled German titles of the songs... andy 19:35, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Rammstein

message: I've removed the evaluation under Wikipedia:WikiProject World music/Assessment, as this article doesn't qualify under that project's scope.  It should be evaluated per the music genres wikiproject. Tuf-Kat 02:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: World music project

message: How could you ever forget to mention THEM?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.195.92.201 (talk) 03:20, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ton Steine Scherben / Rio Reiser 

message: Most german bands, who were classified as Krautrock by journalists would have never called their music Krautrock. They also rejected the term Deutschrock. They rather called themselves progressive bands. KhlavKhalash (talk) 08:44, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Krautrock