Talk:Censorship/Archive 1

message: === Mordekhay Nesiyahu's cosmotheism ===
*Nesiyahu's interpretation of Cosmotheism
===Dr. William L. Pierce's Cosmotheism===
====Jewish, Marxist, Pan-atheist, and Fundamentalist Christianity  Criticisms====
*The Turner Diaries and Cosmotheism: William Pierce's Theology of Revolution by Brad Whitsel  (Nova Religio)
*Gods of the Blood: The Pagan Revival and White Separatism, by Mattias Gardell  ()
*A Blemish on the Blossom: Pantheism and White-Supremacist Hate Groups by Esther Hugenholtz  (Pantheist Index)
*   Pseudo-Pantheism by   (Encyclopedia4U)]
* The Devil and its False Faces  by 
====Cosmotheist Advocacy====
*Cosmotheism site
**A Tribute to the late Dr. William L. Pierce
**The Path, by Dr. William L. Pierce 
**On Living Things, by Dr. William L. Pierce
**On Society by Dr. William L. Pierce
**An example of a Cosmotheist affirmation of belief
*Interview with Dr. William L. Pierce on Cosmotheism (from The Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds by Dr. Robert Griffin)
The following was censored by Cunctator, who is dicking me around.
:The term is also use to describe restrictions on the way ideas are expressed, such as using the term shithead. The prohibition is not on describing the person as stupid or obnoxious but on using profanity.
---------
As such, it is likely not to be only a diatribe against censorship in the us...when you all find that article in stupidely long, and have edited all your soul the very good Steve original article with all the others points and all the other censorship that should not exist in the US (since forbidden by the constitution) we can move it back. Anthere
::
 Line 1: 
- WELCOME GNN'ERS! I EXPECT YOU TO WAGE GUERRILLA WARFARE WITH ME HERE! EDIT THE "STATE TERRORISM" ARTICLE WITH YOUR OWN INPUT! ADD YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT STATE TERROR, DEBATE NWO SUPPORTERS YOU FIND AROUND OTHER ARTICLES, ESTABLISH YOUR PRESENCE THROUGHOUT! THERE IS NO FIELD OF HUMAN ENDEAVOR FREE OF POLITICAL DEBATE AND REVOLUTIONARY ACTION!   
    
- Answer to an Iraqi Doctor of Rutbah, an essay on state terrorism by Frederick George Wilson mailto:f.g.wilson@sbcglobal.net   
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------   
- http://www.blink.org.uk/pdescription.asp?key=1884&grp=27    
-    
- America bombed your children's hospital because she is the worst state terrorist on Earth. She wants your oil, and the effrontery of your children's hospital is in the way. It is a "shield." You dared build your hospitals in cities and not hundreds of feet underground. You dared have a nationalist drop of blood in your body, or a Hippocratic and humanitarian one, and you saved the lives of Iraqi soldiers, and America added this attack to her long list of crimes, making your hospital a target, only to lie and say the strike was accidental. You dared speak out against the hypocrisy of America's supporting brutal dictators where it suits her, but brainwashing her people into supporting the removal of others, in the name of "democracy." Your people dared resist even after thirteen years of starvation by America, under cover of the criminal United Nations-- thirteen years of the crime of genocide--add this to the list of crimes of America and the Bush Crime Family. You dared live in an Islamic country, against which the rulers of the West wage war while declaring publicly that Islam is not the enemy, so that the moderate Islamic leadership in America, hence the masses of Muslims in America, will support a government which secretly seeks to destroy their civilization. As part of her twisted agenda, America is conditioning the world to believe her crimes just, but self-defense by targets of this agenda, terror. These are some of the reasons America bombed your hospital, Doctor. There may be far uglier ones in the hearts of her rulers. Allah only knows.
=== Media distraction ===
"media distraction" is not censorship. Martin
----
I was about to link to a potential article named government-suppressed literature from Samizdat, but that didn't seem to be an appropriate title... the list of banned books is, of course, basically a just a list. How about an article on the subject of goverment suppression of literature: the whys, hows, whos, whats, etc. And where would that be? Government suppression of literature? (I've put this suggestion here as it seemed the most appropriate place. I will now link to this talk page from the two mentioned article talk pages.)-- Sam 21:25, 29 Jul 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: "media distraction" is not censorship. Martin
----
I was about to link to a potential article named government-suppressed literature from Samizdat, but that didn't seem to be an appropriate title... the list of banned books is, of course, basically a just a list. How about an article on the subject of goverment suppression of literature: the whys, hows, whos, whats, etc. And where would that be? Government suppression of literature? (I've put this suggestion here as it seemed the most appropriate place. I will now link to this talk page from the two mentioned article talk pages.)-- Sam 21:25, 29 Jul 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media distraction 

message: But, you had to find out for yourselves. Ah well. Soon he will be gone, I'm sure. Wikipedia will join the other 20-30 internet sites and forums that have banned him.
Nat 03:00, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: nobody likes an 'I told you so' ;)  Sam Spade 04:47, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)

text: But only if he "greatly" increases his "use" of quotation "marks" - DavidWBrooks 14:47, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: I told you so...

message: Given the disputes you're involved in, have you considered the use of mediation between you and those you're disagreeing with as a possible way to resolve the disputes? Jamesday 21:28, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Perhaps mediation?

message: "I try not to waste too much of my time dealing with extremely bigoted and obtuse fanatics of any persuasion, but occasionally there excesses will prompt me to some action, even if it is only to comment."
Psychological projection?-PV  
"Archaic and little known but valid definition: 
cosmotheism = pantheism. ACCEPTED."
That has already been factually cited as being true.-PV
 
Absurd and appallingly ill illogic: 
cosmotheism + bigoted, "racialist", solipsistic nonsense = Cosmotheism, AND THUS cosmotheism = Cosmotheism, and THUS  EQUALS the ultimate representative of all "True" pantheists, and is THUS justified in appropriating all manner of dignified and well heralded names of any philosopher or thinker past, present or future to its "Holy" cause. 
"Absurd and appallingly ill illogic:", I could not agree more! LOL! :D
That is really only MOBY's own "absurd and appallingly ill illogic", 
and not mine nor any true Cosmotheists' own reasoning. 
"Strawman arguement", MOBY.-PV
That it is plainly not the dominant view of all "right-thinking" individuals is only because of nefarious "ZOG" conspiracies, and the like.
LOL! :D
There is always some TRUTH in such HUMOR! :D-PV
I AM ENLIGHTENED! My Holy Universe! How could I not see it before! PV has the ultimate POV of GOD! ALL HAIL his stupendous genius! — since I am not deranged I do not ever say such things save with wearied mockery. 
Indeed.
What could be more ENLIGHTENING than actually realizing that 
"GOD is the impersonal COSMOS and the COSMOS is a impersonal GOD"?-PV
Some people seem to have far more time to disrupt genuine progress in the world than to make any attempt at actually understanding it. 
LOL! :D
No arguement there!-PV
The catalog of great thinkers who were NOT "Cosmotheists" in the particular sense is an interesting and yet invalid appeal to claiming that everyone who doesn't embrace "Cosmotheism" is an incompetent moron, and the dupe of "Zionist" conspiracies. 
"Absurd and appallingly ill illogic:", yet again! LOL! :D
But, many that can't actually understand Cosmotheism are incompetent morons, and many that wouldn't embrace it, even if they weren't morons, are only either lacking in factual knowledge, personal integrity, intellectual honesty, or moral courage, and no more and no less.
What else isn't new?-PV
Even with the wide range of nonsense that exists in the world, I don't think too many people are going to get hooked on PV's particular form of it. Thank the  KOSMOS!
I do completely agree!
True Cosmotheism only banishes the "drug" of those "hooked on SSEE delusions" of only those that have the real strength of character, or the actual personal integrity to uphold it.-PV 
By the way PV, I'm not "David Gerard's" "sock-puppet", and to my remembrance I have not as yet had any form of dialog with him anywhere. 
Sure, David Gerard, sure.
You may as well as be, if not in fact.
-PV
As in many other things you seem to be a bit overconfident in your assessments of what is likely, what is real, what is true, and what is rational.
Hardly. 
I do trust my own judgements.
More often than not I am correct.-PV
I assert that despite my irritation at your obstinacy, and your being an insulter of most people's intelligence, and an accuser of anyone who disagrees with you of being pathologically narcissistic (try and see beyond yourself and actually think about that diagnosis a bit), in your being a nuisance to a lot of other people, I have no ill-will towards you, and truly hope you someday come to know the true joy of really understanding that not everyone in the world who is inclined to disagree with you on anything is a total idiot.  ~ Moby  22:45, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: A response by Moby, David Gerard's [[Sock puppet]]?