lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Olympic Hockey '98

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 14:03, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Tatsuo Shimabuku

message: Master Shimabuku's teachers began with his uncle. In the early 1930's, Shimabuku began structured training under Master Kyan. He then went on to study with Miyagi around 1936, and finally Master Motobu around 1938. See http://www.isshinkai.net/history01-tatsuo.html Also see  Noxia (talk) 22:29, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline Discussions

message: *I removed professor Brown as a notable student as he is not listed in any references. Noxia (talk) 22:32, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have found Edward Brown on a couple of websites, but no inference of notoriety. Noxia (talk) 17:58, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Comments
Talk:Penny Racers (1998 video game)

message: there are about a million different games called Penny Racers, not to mention the US and European versions of the Choro-Q toy line itself. this article really should be under "Choro Q 64". I'd move it myself but I can't be arsed logging in.
83.100.253.46 18:27, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Problem fixed, singled out this article as Nintendo 64 only. Salavat (talk) 03:46, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nintendo 64 version
Talk:Eyrecourt Castle

message: Should this really be the re-direct for "Eyre Court" ... weren't they something to do with the medieval legal system? 213.121.242.7 (talk) 15:40, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Filip Šebo

message: At the moment we say Paul Le Guen has made 6 major signings and then 9 signings. I have amended this to just 9 signings - see article source. BlueValour 16:52, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many signings? 

message: Filip Sebo's name is actually Filip Šebo, like Dado Pršo. I made changes in the article but I don't know how to put it as his real name or redirect somehow. Kickin kyle 05:38, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 
Talk:Vigilante 8

message: Some of the intro is cluttered and parts of the information could be moved into a development history of the game.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowblindmonk (talk • contribs) 03:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: Somehow I doubt the commercial was actually "banned."  I think we need some sort of confirmation of that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.24.168.188 (talk) 17:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll add a citation needed tag on it, if you or anyone else can find something somewhere about it actually being banned then that can be sourced. The Light6 (talk) 09:56, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Banned Commercial
Talk:Middlesex College (New Jersey)

message: It seems to me that the statistics cited in the article (number of students, faculty, courses, programs, etc.) should include a time-frame.--Branlon 16:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Statistics

message: Alansohn recently reverted several changes I made to article that primarily removed a lot of unnecessary information.  These changes primarily removed a lot of quotes that were included in the references section of this article; that's simply an unorthodox practice that isn't necessary.
He or she also asserted that "in the U.S., all community colleges are public."  First, that isn't completely accurate; we have a list of private 2-year colleges that some people might consider "community colleges" because the term isn't an official or regulated one in the U.S.  Second, many readers may not know that most community colleges are public so explicitly stating that the college is public is helpful (and requires only one word!).
There are a handful of other minor edits that were caught up in this unnecessary reversion e.g., linking to the state and country in the first sentence.  Including those links is unnecessary - I have previously asked other editors about that specifically - so I'd appreciate if others who disagree can explicitly discuss that instead of reverting without discussion or comment. ElKevbo (talk) 11:55, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary information included in this article
Talk:Steve Lomas

message: "He has earned 45 caps for the Northern Ireland national team, scoring two hundred goals"
Have I missed a natural goalgetter? ;-) Please fix that number.-Lemmy- 16:58, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Clothing companies of the United States

message: Shouldn't Hang Ten be here?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hang_Ten
I hope it gets added, because all my Asian friends think it originates
from Hong Kong, while it's actually from California.
I would have added it myself, but the Edit link doesn't take me
to the list. I suppose editing categories is more complicated,
or perhaps I don't have the authority to do so. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tharsaile (talk • contribs) August 3, 2006 (17:08 UTC).
Yeah, I just came back to sign and found your comment. Apologies. tharsaile 21:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Yakov Pavlov

message: I was pretty sure that the Archimandrite Cyril is Yakov Pavlov, so I went and found references to justify putting that information back in. Since it turns out that his postwar status in the Russian Orthodox Church is also very notable, I expanded the article considerably to cover that. If someone considers this complete enough to remove the "stub" tag, feel free to do so.
Brokenlibrarian 17:08, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Much to my chagrin, I have discovered that Yakov Pavlov and Ivan Dmitriyevich Pavlov are two separate people, although this is a misconception which has pretty strong legs. Appropriate changes have been made, along with a short explanation about the misconception itself. Brokenlibrarian 16:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't that second link about the wrong Pavlov? --UDoWs 21:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The second link is about both of them, thus "Sergents Pavlov". Brokenlibrarian 21:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I am reading Antony Beevor's "Stalingrad", where after detailing Pavlov's House v. panzers, he ends by saying that after the war Pavlov did indeed enter a monastery of the Russian Orthodox Church. Further, while this article lists his death in 1981, Beevor implies that at the time of the book's writing, 1998, he was still alive, i.e. "He is now very frail" (p. 198). Riseabove2 (talk) 23:31, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Apparently beevor gets it wrong: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bc-rFzC63hU Pluke (talk) 12:25, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Archimandrite Cyril info
Talk:Manila American Cemetery

message: The American Battle Monuments Commission says "It contains the largest number of graves of our military dead of World War II, a total of 17,202, most of whom lost their lives in operations in New Guinea and the Philippines." [].  Also is it the only American military cemetery in Asia?  I heard that somewhere. --Bruce Hall (talk) 07:45, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest in the Pacific or largest WWII cemetery, period?

message: The Commonwealth War Graves Commission records that the cemetery contains the grave of a Royal Navy Chief Petty Officer (classed as World War I Commonwealth casualty) who died in 1920 (granted it may have been a reburial from another burial ground where maintenance could not be assured).  This leads me to question 1941 as the earliest dead contained and to question the apparent assertion (infobox) that only Americans and Filipinos are buried here. Needs checking.Cloptonson (talk) 19:49, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Earlier Dead Than 1941?  Other Nationalities?
Talk:Seaborn Roddenbery

message: There are two listings for this person with different spellings of the last name. One must be incorrect and should be removed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seaborn_Roddenbery
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seaborn_Roddenberry
The correct spelling is Rodenberry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.73.22.130 (talk) 19:47, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just added corrected the bio info in this article based on the Congressional Bio that is cited.  However, there were enough factual errors in the previous version that is makes me question the non-reference material. Unless I hear objections otherwise, I am going to delete the information that is not currently referenceable, so if you disagree please let me know here on teh talk page - preferable with refernces to back up the content in question. Thanks.  --Roswell native 23:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources needed for much of this article

message: Is there any information about a familial relationship between this man and Gene Roddenberry?  I have read that some branches of G. R.'s family used the variant spelling seen here, and the facial resemblance of the two is striking.  -- Davidkevin (talk) 21:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Familial Relationship?
Talk:The Scarecrow (song)

message: I've seen the Scarecrow video, and I'm pretty sure that's actually Syd there, not David... so I'm going to omit that other information.... Underwater 17:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note though that there is a Syd version and a David version. - Face 17:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Video
Talk:Annabel Lee (musician)

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 13:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Where do the families Davies and McMullin come from? (WI)
Should it say Annabel Lee (artist) since the entry is an artist stub. Or move entry to musician page. Also, should it remain a stub. Fenyafrey 17:17, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds logical to me - I've made the requested changes. :bloodofox: 23:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Aggressors of Dark Kombat

message: Adding characters and references to the article. Now all characters articles (previously deleted) from AODK are redirected to this article, to the characters section. Probably this is my last contribuition to Wikipedia, since I'm tired of all of this. --Basara-kun 19:09, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New additions
Talk:Shillelagh Sisters

message: Hi all:
I placed this article with an expert attention, because although i do not doubt that the band existed, or even that it was notable. What I doubt is the appropriateness of the articles tone and the use of the myspace account as a source for this article. If the band is indeed not notable, i should have no objections if another editor were to delete it, or alternatively, it should be written in a manner suitable to its importance, and to a neutral point of view. Cheers V. Joe 17:22, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why expert attention
Talk:Jackson and His Computerband

message: Hey, I know it's not the usual Wikipedia dull entry, but this guy who put this in knows what's up.  I say don't change it.  Music reviews used to be really cool, you know, something the listener could read and relate to.  Instead now we have this ULTRA-pretentious crap made by these ULTRA-nerdy English majors who for sure don't know how to dance or have fun in general.  So we get these horrible phrases like "Smiths-esque" or "head-food album" or "teen pop that's as nourishing as an oil rag and rappers yelling like angry landlords over Mattel beats," god guys, it's music, you know, not a Shakespeare writing assignment.  Here's what WAY more music reviews should be like - 
anyway, I'm Nathan and I like this article just how it is.  And NO I didn't originally write it, but props to who did.
:This is an encyclopedia, not a press release for a record label or a flyer for a danceclub. Where do you expect ultra-nerdy English majors to write?
:As it is now, the article seems to have been written by the artist or one of his friends, or some PR person for his label. It needs major NPOV work. Don't like the encyclopedic tone? Go read Rolling Stone instead of an encyclopedia. Kwertii 22:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone and cleanup
Talk:Alceste (Gluck)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:46, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:François-Joseph Bélanger_-_Set_design_for_Gluck's_Alceste.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for April 23, 2026. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2026-04-23. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 16:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Template talk:Scotland subdivisions

message: I changed this template so that Scottish templates start to look similar to one another. These include: :Template:Scotland subdivisions, :Template:Rugby union in Scotland , :Template:Scotland counties, :Template:Scottish Monarchs, :Template:Scottish Parliament, :Template:Scotland topics amongst others. --Bob 17:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Except the v d e links in the top left all seem to link to the Scottish Parliament! :) Owain (talk) 17:34, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: doh. Changed. --Bob 17:35, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent changes to the template

message: The recent changes seem to be causing problems in the Scotland article: have a look at the layout immediately below where this template is inserted, ie. from the Geography section downwards. Ta. --Mais oui! 12:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whoops 

message: The purpose of this navbox is currently quite unclear, containing a mixture of links to the actual council areas themselves (as suggested by the title), e.g. Midlothian), and piped Easter Egg links to the local authorities that run these areas, e.g. Aberdeen City Council, or even more general article like Politics of Dundee. We then end up with the template appearing on the Aberdeen and Dundee articles despite not linking to them. We need to either stick to one or other type of links, create separate navboxes for the two, or – I would suggest we could incorporate both types here, but clearly delineated in separate groups. Jellyman (talk) 10:03, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused template
Talk:Ali Baba and 40 Thieves (video game)

message: not sure what wp policy says about seperate topics sharing the same article, but a factsheet for the second ali baba game would be nice. i'll add one myself if i can find the info, but if someone else feels like doing it, feel free. k kisses 15:38, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  factbox request
Talk:Standing frame

message: Although I consider this a very useful article, I am concerned that it is primarily an advertisement for a commercial product.  It mentions the products of only one company and closely mirrors that company's web page.  Someone should be able to improve it by adding material on the products of other companies. Too Old 17:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising

message: I think a picture or a diagram would greatly enhance this article. 24.32.205.164 (talk) 13:12, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture?

message: besides for slowing bone demineralization, what other use is there for the standing frame?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.134.177.6 (talk) 18:39, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standing frame usefulness
Talk:ʻElepaio

message: To User:Dysmorodrepanis for making this into a fine article. Kahuroa 17:41, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks

message: I can't believe the bit about eating elepaio has been in here basically since this article was created nearly 10 years ago.  The citations (which aren't even attached to it anymore) don't say that at all; one simply says that it wasn't kapu.  The things are about half a mouthful each!  KarlM (talk) 02:12, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Yum!

message: This article should probably be merged with Hawaiʻi ʻelepaio. Andrew Z. Colvin • Talk 22:17, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm curious as to your reasoning for this suggestion.  With three species in the genus Chasiempis I don't understand why it would be merged with the article of a particular one of those three, as that sounds kind of arbitrary to me (but I freely admit to being a newbie here and am happy to stand corrected as needed!). Kiwikiu (talk) 20:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I resend my proposal. I stated this prior to realizing the reclassification of the subspecies. Though I am unsure about the reclassification itself because the source I used to create the colonization diagram considered the other species to be subspecies of C. sandwichensis. Nevertheless, we can keep them separate articles. Also, welcome to Wikipedia! If you need assistance with anything, you can always message me on my talk page. :) Andrew Z. Colvin • Talk 03:40, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the response & clarification, and for the kind welcome!   Kiwikiu (talk) 05:18, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

text: PS That's a cool map!  Kiwikiu (talk) 05:19, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: See Talk:Hawaiʻi ʻelepaio. — LlywelynII 00:57, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Ampelidae?
Talk:Gobannus

message: I have a few reasons for suggesting a move to Gobanos. First, our two instances resembling Gobannus are two inscriptions written COBANNO with an initial C and a normal first-declension dative singular. Now, it's become customary for many English writers to restore a first declension Gaulish nominative in -os rather than its Latin counterpart in -us. Furthermore, the Berne zinc tablet gives us the equivalent of a G in the form of Γ. Finally, the Centre for Advanced Welsh and Celtic Studies reconstructs the proto-Celtic word for 'smith' as “ *goban- (?) ”, with a long or short a that I can't find a Unicode character for at the moment. In other words, they seem to lean towards a single n as well. Not a huge deal, but what do people think? QuartierLatin1968  17:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: makes sense. the question is, do we want articles titled after reconstructed names (see also Talk:Wōdanaz). Gobanos should in any case be a redirect at least. I suppose the Proto-Celtic (or early Gaulish; 400 BC?) god was called Gobanos, the Gallo-Roman one (AD 200?) Gobannus. dab (ᛏ) 06:40, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I concur with the reasoning above, better to move to Gobanos and the redirect Cobannus to it --Nantonos 23:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move from [[Gobannus]] to [[Gobanos]]?

message: "a bronze cauldron dedicated to Deus Cobannos, in the late 1980s and illegally exported to the USA" says the article, but the footnote refers to an inscription on a tablet: CA.Malibu.JPGM.L.96.AB.54. Perhaps in the enthusiasm of tarring the Getty with the "illegal" part, the actual object got lost?--Wetman (talk) 22:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Illegal

message: I know that the official reason for the Bern's name is that almost mythlogical story with the "bear", but, is it me or the name Brenodor sounds like Bern? Maybe is in fact the ancient name of the city! Bigshotnews 17:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bern as Brenodor? 
Talk:Broadband Global Area Network

message: There is also (April 2014) the Iridium GO! terminal, that gives WiFi access to a LEO constellation from laptops, iPhones etc.  Data rates are low, but the terminal is about 4 inches long, and costs $850 according to the Iridium website.
216.7.151.245 (talk) 14:44, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  not great 

message: 70.29.208.129 (talk) 14:03, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: images

message: From the article: "BGAN terminals are not allowed to be used on the open ocean on a moving vessel". Can I ask why not? this would be useful information.--mgaved (talk) 15:26, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: BGAN not allowed at sea?
Talk:Egeria (Rome)

message: User:Svartalf added an edit which claimed that Mark Antony denying he's a patrician was historically inaccurate. It's not - although he was related to patricians, the Antonii were a plebeian gens (and yes, plebeians did have gentes). By the time the series is set, plebiean ancestry was no bar to political advancement if you had the money. The patricians were those who traced their ancestry, in direct male line only, to the founding families of Rome. They did not monopolise politics - there are consuls from plebeian gentes all the way back in Roman records. A plebeian who got to the top in politics, like Marius, Cicero or Pompey, or like Antony, did not become a patrician, but a noble.
You're not the only one to misunderstand the Roman class system - the article Social class in ancient Rome is completely and fundamentally wrong as it currently stands, conflating the property classes of the census, which were solely based on what you owned, and the plebeian/patrician divide, which was solely based on ancestry through the male line. I keep meaning to rewite it but I haven't had time to gather sources to do it properly yet. --Nicknack009 17:48, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pats and plebs