lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Triazene

message: ??? The functional group clearly deals with organic chemistry and is not an inorganic function ! See Golden Book and Reference N°2 ! 
The pure NH2N=NH chemical compound is very rarely encountered in inorganic chemistry. So,  is more gereral and free of ambiguity. Shinkolobwe (talk) 13:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "pure NH2N=NH chemical compound".  We dont discuss impure compounds very often, you  mean "parent".  Re inorg vs organic, we have a moron loose who relabels the stub category.--Smokefoot (talk) 16:13, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

text: The organic derivatives have been moved to triazenes.  And actual reviews are cited.  1,3-Diphenyltriazene has also been created.--Smokefoot (talk) 21:52, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Smokefoot, are you able to identify/find any references on this parent compound?  My searches only find derivatives! Nothing of the statements in the article have references. Only the ids are referenced. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:59, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Graeme: I looked and looked.  The parent is mentioned in Greenwood and Earnshaw's textbook, but only in terms of the name, no chemistry.  No reviews of the parent could be found. There is an old JChemPhys paper that describes a calculation.  It is surprising that astrochemists do not discussed it.  It never came up when I taught inorganic. --Smokefoot (talk) 11:12, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that, as our article makes several claims about a coloured gas with unpleasant odor, and some kind of boiling point is claimed even, but nothing to prove any of that is true. Could this all be fabrication or original research? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:16, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, maybe youre correct: that is all rubish.  I just checked the Germans. They have refs that I cannot access  but they dont say anything about color or odor or b.p.  These binary hydride articles once were once the objects of obsession, so many of us avoided them.  Maybe the suspect content should be removed. --Smokefoot (talk) 11:25, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inorganic or organic compound, or both ?
Talk:Vicinal (chemistry)

message: I'm worried the information about geminal groups should simply be put in a separate article and there should be a link to the article on geminal groups (and any other terms for the same group duplicated in a molecule as related to spacing).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.79.231.169 (talk) 23:06, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  shouldn't geminal have its own stub?
Talk:Vinyl halide

message: I added a reference to one vinyl halide, but I think the page would benefit from more. Not being an expert, I don't know of any besides vinyl chloride. Arbiter125 19:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples?

message: Every alkene containing at least one halogen atom bonded to an unsaturated carbon is a vinyl halide? So e.g. vinylidene fluoride or tetrafluoroethene are also considered as vinyl halides? --79.243.239.213 (talk) 14:05, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, those two compounds are generally considered to be vinyl halides.  ChemNerd (talk) 14:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition
Talk:Walter Johnson High School

message: Someone should add something about the team's recent football win.  Its been the first win in four years.  It was covered by the Washington Post and the Gazette.
71.163.175.129 (talk) 19:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea someone. Go for it! DoubleBlue (Talk) 20:09, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Football 

message: I’m not familiar w adding information but this alum is very notable. Her courage transformed “ Don’t ask don’t tell” in the US Army. She attained the rank of Colonel, and has numerous achievements. I hope she can be added to this page. 66.165.13.46 (talk) 03:03, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, to start off, it would help if you spelled her name right. It's "Cammermeyer", not "Cammemeyer". She is notable and has a Wikipedia article at Margarethe Cammermeyer, so all you have to do is find a reliable source that says she attended this school and she can be added. Meters (talk) 03:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grethe Cammemeyer, (Serving in Silence autobiography and movie) graduated in 1959.
Talk:Cruise (aeronautics)

message: There is a discussion of Concorde cruise characteristics at PPrune which implies that Vc is not defined in terms of speed of the aircraft relative to the bulk air. For supersonic craft is it defined as the speed of the air relative to the aircraft behind the shock wave?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottwh (talk • contribs) 15:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supersonic aircraft 

message: What about the cruising speed of boats.  I was looking for a definition of that, and I couldn't find one.  If someone would be so kind as to include that. Bill Heller (talk) 18:06, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Clearly this article isn't about boats.  But you might be interested in hull speed.  —EncMstr (talk) 21:40, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cruising speed of boats
Talk:Poincaré–Hopf theorem

message: I added a paragraph entitled "Significance" which I hope will give the reader some concept of what index theorems are and why they are important. I hope I wasn't overly, well, enthusiastic. This theorem is a favorite of mine. The proof here is also sufficiently elementary that it seemed reasonable to briefly outline the main ideas underlying the proof.
Greg Woodhouse 23:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

message: The introduction paragraph does not actually give a brief description of the theorem, formal or otherwise. I feel that a sentence or two summarising the result would somewhat improve a reader's first impressions of this article. PhysicsSean (talk) 16:07, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revised Introduction 

message: The definitions used in the theorem need more complete explanations.  The Euler characteristic can be understood from the link, but the term index is too general, so the referenced page doesn't lead directly to the required definition.  Could somebody who knows this please insert a summary of what index means in this case (winding number?)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.186.131.40 (talk) 20:21, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Either the definition of index should be more clear somewhere, or the definition should be added here. If this Theorem comprises a significant part of the usage of this meaning of "index", it should probably be here (but I'm not sure)? Franp9am (talk) 02:01, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Index 

message: I can't understand why there is a sketch of a proof when no reference is given to the complete proof.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.19.253 (talk) 07:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a quick reference to the Springer site. That page mentions a well-known book by John Milnor, and I presume it has a proof. Charles Matthews (talk) 22:12, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  References? 

message: I've changed the notation for the index of a vector field v at a point x from "indexv(x)" to "indexx(v)". This is to emphasize that the index is being viewed as a property of the vector field v as opposed to of the point x. Foxjwill (talk) 23:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation for index 

message: What does it mean for a vector field on an abstract diffenrentiable manifold with boundary to point in the outward normal direction on the boundary? Certainly "normal" makes no sense. As for the "outward", maybe it needs to be explained? As far as I know, a priori it only makes sense to consider vector fields that are tangent to the boundary.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:EE33:210:D17E:A934:2EB2:91B8 (talk) 11:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the statement make any sense? 

message: There is a generalisation due to Morse that allows one to remove the constraint that the vector field must be pointing outwards on the boundary of the manifold. A modern proof and explanation of the history of similar generalisations can be found here. 212.201.78.215 (talk) 11:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generalisation to relax the boundary condition.
Talk:Pressure altitude

message: eg. in meteorology ? Article needs experts to clarify ? - Rod57 (talk) 20:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this term used outside of aviation ? 

message: Can an airship or balloon be said to have a pressure altitude (as in LZ 129 Hindenburg#First commercial passenger flight) ? - Rod57 (talk) 20:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Airship

message: The article mentions that QNE is used for landing in unusual conditions where the altimeter setting exceeds specific values. However QNH and QFE are way more frequent for that purpose. QNE is really the pressure altitude used for (high) flight levels, which is also mentioned in the article.
Wouldn't it be better to remove the sentence "In other words, it is the pressure altitude at the landing runway threshold." because this is basically never used? What would be a typical example of an airport that uses QNE for landing?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.190.2.100 (talk) 10:47, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  confusing usage 

message: It is unclear how this has been derived, and I was unable to get a correct pressure using this formula.
It appears a correct inversion of the formula is:
Pressure in hPa = 6.83679 * 10^-25 * (145,366.45 - h)^100/19
where h is altitude in feet. Ownself (talk) 23:23, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You convert the altitude from feet to meter, divide both sides of the given equation by the altitude, move the expression with the 0.19th power on one side, raise both sides to the 5.25th power (obviously 0.190*5.255=1) and finally multiply both sides by 1013.25 hPa. R. J. Mathar (talk) 19:31, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inverse formula unclear or incorrect
Talk:Descent (aeronautics)

message: What about dive rate limitations for safey purpose? Thanks. --Adriano Esposito (talk) 09:08, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea—if you mean the maximum rate of descent and maximum speed.  Maneuvering speed plays a role here too.  —EncMstr (talk) 16:38, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dive rate limitations 
Talk:Bhola District

message: *Potentially Malicious Domain:
*hxxp://www.amaderbarisal.com/ 
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/ffbb3c4679f2dd97cc1d56420fe901e70dba501cce671ade32105d2640b1bcba/analysis/1373472177/
*hxxp://www.amaderbarisal.com/wp-content/plugins/wp-polls/polls-js.js?ver=2.63
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/url/e907cda7ee83b0b37dc22d0a57394f79db37a8b2f9e5ffd3bbab99ec9ff0079f/analysis/1373649318/
*TROJ_GEN.F47V1224 
*https://www.virustotal.com/de/file/e74dc2a2eef5cb64763831eac8a3b3c7e60eec6120b520e40194f8c74d3f0555/analysis/1369489807/
*SEE ALSO: http://www.UnmaskParasites.com/security-report/?page=www.amaderbarisal.com
--Gary Dee 17:40, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malware Link Removal 
Talk:John Young (Canadian politician)

message: In the current article it states "Article posted by John Young's Great-great-great-granddaughter". I just picked one example of why I think is original research: "In his Rosemount home, Young had a very large, oversized, wire-backed armchair. It is believed that this chair was reserved for the ample frame of Cure Labelle when he came to discuss the building of the railway to serve St. Jerome and the Laurentians. The chair is now property of his Great-great-granddaughter." If you look in the Canadian Biography Online entry (http://www.biographi.ca/EN/ShowBio.asp?BioId=39454) you will not see this mentioned. This is just one example. --YUL89YYZ 23:37, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Andrés Henestrosa

message: There is a nice article on him in Américas (OAS):
Bach, Caleb. "Andrés Henestrosa: de la fa`bula a la fama<' Américas (April 2005), pp. 38-45. Kdammers (talk) 00:52, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resource
Talk:Hungary at the 1988 Winter Olympics

message: aaaaah, I was unsure if they did. thanks again wikipedia <3 from cracked and IAB!
rgsupergrover  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.172.35 (talk) 07:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: welcome 68.94.185.126 (talk) 04:50, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Oronamin C

message: or is it similar products since the link goes no where  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.61.128.114 (talk) 08:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Imitation products?
Talk:Tabú Tek

message: Well guys i started this band page of tabu Tek a Band of the Dominican Republic. Please Do Not Delete. This May Be some good sites of info.
*http://rock-dom.tripod.com/tabutek.html
*http://www.answers.com/topic/tabu-tek
*http://www.geocities.com/SunsetStrip/Club/2701/
*http://www.terra.com.do/rockdominicano/bandas/tabu.htm
thanks EdwinCasadoBaez 23:44, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Welcome
Talk:Iceland at the 1992 Winter Olympics

message: Also suggest merging this article with the 92 Olympics article, given it doesn't add any further value...FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 23:53, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Nitrene

message: Hi, I added some great citations for the aziridination of olefins using nitrenes. I also changed the wording a bit. Silverweed (talk) 07:38, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits made 

message: Who can create a redirect page for 'imene'?
Simon de Danser (talk) 09:44, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: DMacks (talk) 04:32, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect request
Talk:Triplet oxygen

message: According to Zumdahl's "Chemistry", in degeneration of the the 2p orbitals, orbitals, the two pi-bonding orbitals are below the sigma bonding orbitals (the antibonding orbitals are ok however). (this e.g. is the a mode of explaining the paramagnetic character of Boron)
Anyone willing to change the scheme accordingly?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by L.tak (talk • contribs) 21:44, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the article is probably right as it is now. In Brown, LeMay & Bursten ("Chemistry: The Central Science", 10th edition), on p381 (Fig 9.44) it states "When the 2s and 2p orbitals interact, the σ2s MO falls in energy and the σ2p MO rises in energy.  For O2, F2 and Ne2, the interaction is small, and the σ2p remains below the π2p (my emphasis), as in Figure 9.42.  For B2, C2 and N2, the 2s-2p interaction is great enough that the σ2p MO rises above the π2p MOs, as shown...". I interpret that to mean that the diagram shown is right, but that you are right in thinking that B2 shows this unusual ordering of MOs. Walkerma (talk) 06:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

text: @L.tak what 222.152.172.104 (talk) 04:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: After recent changes, I think the tags can be removed, although the article should still be expanded:
- This article needs attention from an expert in Chemistry. (March 2015)
Organic, organometallic, inorganic chemistry are my areas of expertise (in descending order of expertise)
- This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 2014)
Unreliable citations and irrelevant, unverified statements have been removed.  Factual statements are now adequately referenced. Thanks, Dirac66! 
- This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. (August 2015)
Intro has been rewritten to only talk about most pertinent facts, with technical language explained or at least linked.
Alsosaid1987 (talk) 06:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of tags 2017
Talk:Jon Diebler

message: 100 bagillion career points???? Santavez 02:04, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Plantar reflex

message: Would it be more appropriate to name this article the Babinski reflex and have Plantar reflex point here?  It's called the Babinski reflex more often in the article...
This also disagrees with Primitive reflexes, which states that Babinski and Plantar are totally different.  Can anyone clarify this? Juru (talk) 02:06, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: An anonymous editor inserted:
:The plantar reflex may indicate a CVA or a [[hemiplegic migraine. The neurologist should ascertain, before ordering tests, that the patient will survive them. Some patients have potentially lethal allergies to the iodinated contrast media that are used in T scans. 
:(A physician who observes an abnormal plantar reflex ["positive Babinsky"] and a "blown" pupil [pupil dilated and unresponsive to light] may think the patient is having a stroke and order a CT scan with iodinated contrast medium, even if the patient reports an allergy to the medium. In such a situation, the patient may have no alternative other then leaving "against medical advice" and going to another hospital; with luck, the patient will encounter an experienced and rational neurologist who will conclude that it's a hemiplegic migraine--alarming but not rare--and order the standard treatment [50-100 mg Demerol and 50 mg [[diphenhydramine]|Benedryl]], injected IM] and send the patient home when symptoms improve.)
All of this is soapboxing. Unenhanced CTs are adequate to identify cerebral bleed, and encountering a rational neurologist without being referred formally may be quite hard indeed. There is no standard treatment for hemiplegic migraine, but most neurologists would like to rule out haemorrhage in a new severe headache with lateralising signs. JFW | T@lk 23:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Soapboxing

message: It is said in the article that the term "Babinski's sign (or Koch's sign) refers to its pathological form". But later it shows a picture of a baby foot with a "Babinski's Sign in a healthy newborn". Could anyone correct this?
that's not an error because as it is already said in the article, the Babinki's sign is normal in newborns.
Rhcastilhos (talk) 06:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: The Interpretation section does not discuss the case of: no response.  In some information I've come across, it said this is cause for further investigation.  Some other literature said no response is a sign of transverse myelitis.  This article should clearly and carefully delve into the medical opinions of what no response indicates.
64.134.58.155 (talk) 00:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "no response" lacking in Interpretation section 

message: something similar is Puusepp's sign. Is it a definable concept? If not, then the redirect should be done or red links to be unlinked Estopedist1 (talk) 12:32, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puusepp's sign
Talk:Ideal (German band)

message: This section was commented out, I moved it here so it would be visible:  RJFJR (talk) 23:08, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 
Talk:Annette Ziegler

message: This article seems like Annette Ziegler's campaign created the whole thing.  I'd be weary of bias.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.86.223.85 (talk • contribs) 
: This is obviously campaign material.  She is currently running for the Supreme Court of Wisconsin AND under investigation by the Wisconsin Judicial Committee (the group that makes and enforces rules on judicial ethics in our state).Wisconsinproud 12:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm gonna clean this up in the next day or so....I want to find a few articles on Ziegler so I have a cross section of things first. NickBurns 22:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, cleaned up a bit. The last paragraph is in both this article and Linda Clifford's...in the interest of being equal and fair to both. NickBurns 16:54, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:MS-CHAP

message: there should be a mention of MS-CHAPv2's fatal security flaws, namely the padding of the DES key with 16 bits of zeros which effectively makes brute forcing dictionary attacks faster by at least 5 orders of magnitude...this attack is discussed in the LEAP article so it should probably be mentioned here --Michael Lynn 00:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be nice if someone wrote an overview of how well do SOHO routers implement MS-CHAP authentication. Most vendors don't specify which authentication scheme is supported, which in reality can vary from PAP/CHAP to also supporting MS-CHAPv1 or even MS-CHAPv2. Implementation of the latter is the most rare in routers, I guess, but it isn't so rare on the provider side. 213.234.235.82 (talk) 13:19, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MS-CHAP and home routers 

message: "It is further used as the main authentication option of the Protected Extensible Authentication Protocol (PEAP)."
It should be metioned, that it is only for PEAPv0 not PEAPv1. Microsoft refers to PEAPv0 as PEAP, because it is the only version they use.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protected_Extensible_Authentication_Protocol#PEAPv0_with_EAP-MSCHAPv2
--KaffeeMitSpeck (talk) 16:14, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  PEAP 

message: According to several articles, one should note that in Windows 11 22h2, with the default activation of Windows Defender Credential Guard, you can't authenticate with MSCHAPv2. 141.134.100.127 (talk) 13:48, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  MSCHAPv2 incompatible with Windows 11 22h2
Talk:Diagon

message: This page should not be deleted because it is of a band but it is written by its tach manager. The main members will later edit it to make sure it meets all the criteria to not delete it. Please leave it here for about a month so the band can edit it to the guidelines and there wantment. 
                  Thanks,
                 Zachwistheman 00:04, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dictionnaire Infernal

message: I believe much of this content has been plagiarized from http://www.stpeterslist.com/1279/dictionnaire-infernal-24-demon-sketches/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.174.87.84 (talk) 16:07, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  plagiarism 

message: i notice that a lot of your Dictionnaire Infernal  has been edited by wiccans and occultists, i myself am neither but maintain a strict interest in demonology, i hope my contributions can be of some service. what i am attempting to complete the listings as a guide to demonics and spirits for use by priests  and spiritualists. thank you.--Tophatdan 08:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  a few things 

message: Well, I really don't think this article is ready. In fact, I'm going to mark it for clean up. There is a lot of information that is not about the book itself but about the author (Such information should be added to the author's article).
Also there is unreferenced information, especially the text in french that comes from the article in the french Wiki, and it is also unreferenced in there.
And finally, there are some bogus links that can be atributed to original research of the editor that put them.
One last thing, I would like to notice that there isn't a single reference to the text itself (not even an external link) or to considerable parts of it. So we really cannot check the acuracy of the listed demons. --Legion fi 07:55, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new begining 

message: Either WIkipedia is incorrect, or the Cornell site with pages from the Dictionnaire Infernal is incorrect. In particular, the image identified by Wikipedia as Asmodeus is a different demon altogether.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.85.182.166 (talk) 06:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Images

message: Is the list of demons a selection of just some of the demons that have entries in the dictionary, or specifically the demons that were illustrated by Breton? If it's the latter, then that section is not altogether correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.26.239.20 (talk) 11:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of demons