lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
File talk:National entities of the british isles.png

message: Euhmm... So why's the flag of Cornwall on this? The Minister of War 17:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Cornish are a separate ethnic minority, see Cornish people. --Joowwww (talk) 22:15, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

message: Ireland's not part of the Britsh isles!
The UK's part of the Irish islesMarkreidyhp 07:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Geographically Ireland is part of the British Isles. The 'British Isles' has always been the term to describe these areas whether they're British or not (for some reason). :P--Tlle1 (talk) 11:02, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the word "British" meant the islands first, before it had anything to do with the UK; then it was used by the UK as their demonym, because there is basically no other word which covers the English, Scots, Welsh and Cornish. - Oisín(Message) 22:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish Flag 

message: The flag used for Northern Ireland is no longer recgonised and has not been official for over 30 years. Markmc93 (talk) 19:42, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But it is still recognised by many people and organisations as the flag. The C of E.           God Save The Queen! (talk) 12:56, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is utterly unofficial for the Country; but it is still used for the ethnic Ulster-Scots / Anglo-Irish; which is what this image represents. - Oisín(Message) 21:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern Ireland
Talk:Royal entry

message: Oppose This has been discussed before & I think the Flemish material is too specific. The merge proposal has not been set up correctly - for one thing it is now 2013. Johnbod (talk) 14:57, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The year was easily fixed; were there other problems? Oreo Priest talk 19:30, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, exactly, there's the problem - that would probably give WP:UNDUE weight in a combined article. Johnbod (talk) 20:54, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose I should clarify that if 'Joyous Entry' is a disambig page between a) royal entry b) the 1356 charter and c) the list, then I don't really see how any undue weight would be given. Oreo Priest talk 17:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: How would that work if you are merging them? I don't see the need for a list myself. Altogether there would be hundreds of them. Johnbod (talk) 18:23, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, would you advocate removing the existing list of Joyous entries from that page? Oreo Priest talk 18:45, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No - it's almost a list article already, with just a brief introduction. I'm still not seeing what the problem with the current arrangement is. Johnbod (talk) 21:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

text: I'm now unclear what exactly the proposal, or problem it is supposed to fix, is. Johnbod (talk) 00:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I've removed the statement about the acceptance of nudity in the entries. While nudity may have occurred in the entry of Charles the Bold into Lille, that unique instance is not enough to assert that there was a "surprising amount" of public nudity of both sexes. As for Wilenski's source, it is a 18th-century copy of a lost 15th-century originalArchives Municipales, Lille, AG. 1, item 1. That source also reports that the three women in the roles of the three graces were the three "ugliest" women in town--in other words, it was a rare instance of farce in an otherwise austere iconographic tradition. Even if this event happened as recorded in the surviving third-hand document, it certainly does not constitute the norm that the public had grown accustomed to. 
Wawaca (talk) 04:51, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nudity in the entries
Talk:Baraza la Kiswahili la Taifa

message: kazi za baraza la kiswahili Tanzania ni kamaifuatavyo
kushawishi serikali katika kukuza utamaduni wa kiswwahili
kuwaapamori watunziwavitabu vya kiswahili
kupitia na kuhakikimajalida mbalimbali ya kuendelezakiswahili na kutuza utamaduni kiswhili
kuandaa kamusi mpya zinazokwenda na wakati kukizi mahitaji ya walengwa
kuandaa mikakati mbadala juu ya  mfumo wa lugha kiswahili
kuandaa semina za kelimisha walimu wa kiswahili
nanguka 17:55, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article urgenly needs cleanup. Some content is nonsense (Zanzibar was bever ruled by Germans, Marxism fear was not the reason for choosing Swahili); TUKI was never "purely academic"... And most of this section is without references, Kipala (talk) 15:43, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Siissisoq

message: Is this article at all notable? I would like to nominate it for deletion.Avman89 (talk) 03:02, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The band is labeled as being innactive through the tense used and the list of "past members" but the band is still active and putting out new releases. 
Also it says in the first sentence that they're a heavy metal band but then in the genres tab it does not mention heavy metal. Krylon Technicolor Type A (talk) 00:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistancies
Talk:Caproni Ca.309

message: This entry shows Alfa Romeo 115-II power rating as 390 (each).  However, the entry for Alfa Romeo 115 lists its rating as 120 hp.  Is this a discrepancy, or is the -II version of that engine markedly upgraded from the basic 115?  Can somebody clarify the point?  Thanks in advance. Raymondwinn (talk) 07:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rated engine power

message: It might help to have an explicit note on the formation "Ca.309" (no space). This looks funny in English, so was it the company's standard notation, or is it more natural in Italian?  Imaginatorium (talk) 05:59, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name and abbreviation
Talk:Oberlin Conservatory of Music

message: While I agree with the following, I'd like to identify and then change this ambiguous sentence from "one of a few" to "one of X"
It is one of the few American conservatories to be completely attached to a liberal arts college (Oberlin College, allowing students the opportunity to seriously pursue degrees in both music and a traditional liberal arts subject via the five year Double-Degree program).
Does anyone have any ideas?
--TMH (talk) 20:37, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "One of a few" ...

message: This article has been around for 16 years but there's not enough here in terms of content or sources to warrant its own page. It should be a section in the Oberlin Conservatory of Music article, unless someone is planning to expand it. ... discospinster talk 18:52, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Since nobody has weighed in on this discussion I will be bold and do the merge. ... discospinster talk 21:37, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Oberlin Jazz Ensemble]] into [[Oberlin Conservatory of Music]]
Template talk:Tripura-geo-stub

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 11:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition
Talk:List of middle schools in Miami-Dade County

message: balcksaojgofjhofijgireyhgiryhjroigy7ys6t666ahrhf6yhabeididiidhahdhthnernynrhtrjkhbkjfewhyrjgiosjfiuauyagejkediayda7hebidaybedaifhodjgphgjhkldvl pèuta!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.203.47.122 (talk) 03:22, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Fresh frozen plasma

message: Plasma is simular to FFP but it has some reduction of Factor V as mentioned in this article. However there is also a clinically significant reduction in Factor VIII.
Truetraveler 18:17, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plasma

message: I'm surprised that nobody's said anything about the claims given in the effectiveness section. It's pretty controversial and un-cited.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.104.23.1 (talk) 20:20, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effectiveness 

message: I reverted this good faith edit by  which added a huge block of text about Octaplas which was copied directly from a recently-declined submission to Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Octaplas: Indications, Safety, and Molecular Function.
I removed it because it didn't make sense in this section and it was such a huge, out-of-context submission.  Experts in the topic should pick through the information and add whatever is appropriate to this or other articles to make them better.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 23:01, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effectiveness - removed large block of text that didn't make sense there 

message: ... of FFP in JTH - doi:10.1111/jth.12351 JFW | T@lk 20:52, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: I am surprised that there is zero discussion of the shelf-life of this material. Its an obviously important issue. So, if kept frozen, how long is it effective? If data about effectiveness as a function of time or storage temperature are available, they would be even better. I gotta believe that that is available.Abitslow (talk) 00:02, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stability? 

message: User:Kerrylob11 not sure about this bit "Plasma must be ABO compatible with the intended transfusion recipient's red cells."
Many sources I have red says this is desirable but not required.
What is the page number for the source in question? "MUST be compatible with the recipient's red cells". TECHNICAL MANUAL, 18TH EDITION, CHAPTER 15, PAGE 375. (Kerrylob11 (talk) 20:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Text
Talk:Richard Fiennes, 7th Baron Dacre

message: The link to Richard's son, William Fiennes is incorrect.  It leads to another William Fiennes, of a later generation.
64.40.54.186 (talk) 05:13, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect link 

message: The article says "He was invested as a Knight before 8 June 1422.[1] He held the office of Treasurer of the Household between 1439 and 1446,[1] and financed initial construction of Herstmonceux Castle with spoils from the Hundred Years' War."  Except that the article about his father says that the father was the treasurer for that period. Richard would have been 24 at the time of appointment as treasurer (unusually young), and had his knighthood before he was 7 years old.  I'm pretty sure that this should be moved to his father's article! I'm moving it, but if anyone thinks otherwise, feel free to move it back.  Cyberherbalist (talk) 14:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Confused with his father?
Talk:Zhao Zong-Yuan

message: he is now grandmaster: http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/our-new-21yearold-chess-grandmaster/2008/01/31/1201714123876.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.154.38.154 (talk) 04:38, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome! Thanks, I'll put it in. Peter Ballard (talk) 04:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grandmaster 
Talk:Abbot Point

message: Due to Minister Burke's recent approval of the new coal port at Abbot Point, new information should be added regarding the size of the new coal port, it's purpose, owners and the huge amount of criticism by Greenpeace, UNESCO and the public regarding its approval, due to its positioning in the Great Barrier Reef. JamesA  >talk 12:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated 
Talk:Salpingectomy

message: The phrase ovarian tube-sparing counterparts should have a hyperlink.  The best I could find was the Tubal ligation page. Tfischer83702 (talk) 14:32, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing link for ovarian tube-sparing counterparts 

message: Both articles cover the same procedure. –Yutsi - Talk/Edits 19:15, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: *Oppose actually, this article covers in detail aspects that are specific to a prophyactic salpingectomy which is I believe a topic notable enough to have an article of its own. Tom (LT) (talk) 05:13, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Prophylactic salpingectomy]] with [[Salpingectomy]]
Talk:Zos Kia Cultus

message: I don't agree. Kia is a mystical idea but Zos Kia Cultus is a school of thought. Moreover Kia is invented by Austin Osman Spare himself, but Zos Kia Cultus is a named "designated" by some of his friends and followers. I suggest that Zos Kia Cultus becomes merged with Austin Osman Spare as it has marked "stub" for a very long time and it contains a few information; and I believe that Zos Kia Cultus won't expand; because we do not have any "Zos Kia Cultus" cult or lodge or formal society etc. If you agree with me, I will merge Zos Kia Cultus and Austin Osman Spare myself. --Sepand 18:42, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Authorization for Use of Military Force of 2001

message: Previous discussion contents reside on Authorization for Use of Military Force discussion page due to creation of disambiguation page. --Fitzhugh 19:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is an "Authorization", not a law. Isn't it simply a resolution? If that is so it has no legal force, and cannot be cited as authority for any action.Royalcourtier (talk) 19:11, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authorisation? 

message: This edit caught my eye. Its edit summary says: [...]"Against Terrorists" appears nowhere in the title of the actual law, and, the law is in fact not written to cover "against terrorists" but only a specific application. The original title is misleading.. I see that PL 107-40 (2001-09-18) is titled: "Joint Resolution : To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against those responsible for the recent attacks launched against the United States.". Should there be a  to move this article from its current title to Authorization for Use of Military Force, removing Against Terrorists? It seems to me this question ought to have been raised previously. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 09:34, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move Request? 

message: I moved this page from Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists to its current title, Authorization for Use of Military Force of 2001. The name of the law is just Authorisation for Use of Military Force, but that would be ambiguous. I couldn't find much usage of the Against Terrorists disambiguator in reliable sources, and the usages I could find seemed to originate from Wikipedia. However, I'm now not sure whether the new title is in fact the best option.
The reasonable options seem to be:
#Authorization for Use of Military Force of 2001 (status quo, e.g. NY Times article, Washington Times article, Statement from congressman, Scholarly article, International organisation)
#2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (e.g. CRS report, Heritage Foundation report, CNN article, NPR article, Statement to Congressional hearing, Congressional bill)
#Authorization for Use of Military Force Against September 11 Terrorists (e.g. United States Code, Scholarly article, Another scholarly article)
Option 1 (+ of 2001), which is what I went with, makes use of a standard disambiguation format for U.S. legislation, but it doesn't seem to be particularly common for this law, perhaps because it sounds a bit unnatural. The most common real-world disambiguation seems to be Option 2 (just appending 2001 at front). To the extent that there is an official unambiguous name, The United States Code, which creates editorial disambiguators for legislation where needed, uses Option 3 (+ Against September 11 Terrorists), but that usage isn't very common outside of formal or scholarly settings.
Would be useful to get another opinion. Charlie A. (talk) 17:07, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Steve Hunter

message: To be continued. Rothorpe 18:49, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Rothorpe 19:48, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits

message: Thanks to the person who started Hunter's page, but some of the info was incorrect and incomplete.  I added his solo discog and a partial "Contribution" section, which I will complete within the week. MG196 10:55, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks

message: 'Reed and Hunter are currently working on a new live version of Berlin.' This has been here since 2007. Still? Rothorpe (talk) 13:09, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Berlin'' live

message: On Friday, November 9th 2012, Hunter was briefly hospitalized for an irregular heartbeat. Source: http://www.nightswithalicecooper.com/whats-news/alice-cooper-guitarist-steve-hunter-hospitalized
Would someone be so kind as to add this? I'm not quite familiar enough for myself I think.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yrkidding17 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Hospitalization

message: whencan you put the new red boot stickers on my rava4billings gates live losbter price per.lb to be shipped to st alber 96.52.118.26 (talk) 17:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where can l purchase live losber in edmonton
Talk:Portolá expedition

message: Treutlein, Theodore E. The Portolá Expedition of 1769-1770. California Historical Society Quarterly, 1968.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conor.morris (talk • contribs) 04:09, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography

message: 1. The article repeatedly says that the initiative for exploring Alta California came from the King of Spain. While this may be literally true, if there is documentation to prove it, would it be less archaic to say that it was initiated by the Spanish authorities? Wouldn’t the actual execution have been done by the viceregal government of Nueva España/New Spain?
2. Why in the picture of Gaspar de Portolá has he grown a beard and put on the armour of about 200 years earlier? 
--Hors-la-loi 07:54, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Difficulties with article

message: Sources differ, but the article about Gaspar de Portolà uses a grave accent, not an acute, and that corresponds to the way he actually signed his name (there's a facsimile in that article) so it seems to me that's the spelling we should use. A question and answer on the talk page confirms that the grave is the agreed spelling. Colonies Chris (talk) 20:27, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: There are three citations of the California Historical Society Quarterly which each have two different page references, 291 and 213. Which should it be? Colonies Chris (talk) 20:34, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be gone for good. If it's found, should be re-added to External Links.Glendoremus (talk) 04:04, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: A cite tag was recently (12 July 2017) added to the 'Background' section by User:Howcheng. In an attempt to clear the tag, I asked what are the specific concerns? I don't see anything in the un-sourced (but heavily wikilinked) middle 3 paragraphs that seems to need a citation for verification, so I'm putting the question out to other editors. Post any specific concerns here, and I'll try to find sources. If there are none after 6 months, I propose to remove the tag. WCCasey (talk) 16:54, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:Summary style#Technique (yes I know that guideline is about summary sections, but the same principle applies here):  So even though this section has links to other articles (presumably with references), you still need to have references here. Thanks. —howcheng  {chat} 17:20, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: So I ask again - what specifically is in those 3 paragraphs that you think is "likely to be challenged"? I'm trying to understand what you're looking for. WCCasey (talk) 05:39, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed?
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Protected titles/Specific Admin

message: These pages are a violation of WP:PROTECT and admins should not have "personal" cascade protection pages. What would you need to discuss at ANI of the village pump? Whether such pages are allowed? No, that's what this MFD debate is for. Melsaran (talk) 18:55, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - to clarify, I am not requesting a change in policy, nor is this intended to be a complaint about a specific admin's conduct. The argument is that these pages are a violation of existing policy. Videmus Omnia  Talk  19:01, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disagree with speedy close
Talk:Rudd Concession

message: I think the article is very informative although perhaps somewhat negative in tone.
However, I am not happy with the wording of the last paragraph and I have made one minor change (about the gold deposits being mostly gone ). They were certainly not (average annual gold output of the territory was around 25 tonnes through most of the 20th century). However, although the gist of the final statement is vaguely true, it is quite false to say that the wealth of the country was only in the land - the early development of the country was paid for by mining receipts, in particular Southern Rhodesia like South Africa was one of the first parts of the British Empire to recover fully from the Depression (around 1933/34) due to rise in the price of gold.
Could the author rectify this as I would rather not interfere if I can avoid it?--AssegaiAli 14:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks l really needed this 165.57.81.36 (talk) 18:49, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Me too 165.57.81.36 (talk) 18:48, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Proportionality (political maxim)

message: This should be merged into Subsidiarity#European Union law as "principle of subsidiarity" is a far more common name used to describe Article 3b which this article quotes. --PBS (talk) 20:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, since proportionality also exists outside EU law.Sjö (talk) 22:04, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: After I discovered Proportionality (law) and had another look at this article I agree with PBS.Sjö (talk) 14:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[principle of subsidiarity]] 

message: This is an invented topic. The proportionality referred to in the EU treaties is the one proportionality (law). The writer appears to have confused it with subsidiarity. Proportionality (law) isn't particularly well written but that can be fixed. — Blue-Haired Lawyer t 12:56, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete/merge to Proportionality (law)