lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fort Shelby (Michigan)

message: Another wrinkle in the question of whether Fort Shelby was ever officially called Fort Detroit, or whether that was simply a common name for it. The following source says "Fort Lernoult was officially renamed Fort Detroit in 1805" but does not give a citation for the claim:
* , p. 1776
The other sources that say the fort was actually named Fort Detroit suggest that the renaming happened in 1796, and of course other sources categorically state that the fort was named Fort Lernoult until it became Fort Shelby. The article above references the following sources, one of which might be the source for the 1805 claim:
* F. Clever Bald (1948), Detroit's First American Decade, 1796 to 1805
* Brian Leigh Dunnigan (2001), Frontier Metropolis: Picturing Early Detroit, 1701-1838
* Philip P. Mason (1964), Detroit, Fort Lernoult, and the American Revolution
* Howard H. Peckham (1994), Pontiac and the Indian Uprising
I think the matter is of more than academic interest, since there are so many articles on Wikipedia that refer to the fort as "Fort Detroit." Anyone with access to the above sources or other sources that seem authoritative on the subject? -Sarcasmboy 06:50, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the article after finding a source that cites an August 5, 1805, letter from Secretary of War Henry Dearborn stating that the fort had been renamed Fort Detroit. -Sarcasmboy 23:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More contradictory evidence as to the name
Talk:THWN

message: Talk:THWN
I reverted the article back to using the terms "alphabetism or initialism" because the Wiki article currently entitled Acronyms (which also includes the terms alphabetism and initialism) states that acronyms are usually pronounceable as words, which THWN is not. Even if the term acronym is far more common, it is not more accurate in this case. Besides, allow readers to stretch their minds on an unfamiliar word every now and then. ;>) 204.58.248.32 03:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:One Love (Aiden song)

message: i think this is basically saying that aiden sold out (i agree but thats not the point, wikipedia's not supposed to be biased). i dont think an opinion like that belongs in wikipedia. any thoughts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gpmuscillo (talk • contribs) 18:42, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  more "scene" image
Talk:San Rafael National High School (Tigaon, Camarines Sur)

message: The neutrality of this article is disputed after having a quick run down of the content. When editing the encyclopedia, content must conform to a nuetral point of view and must not be biased or read like an ad. I have removed some statements but more needs to be done to improve the article. Might be a good idea to read Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines. Monster Under Your Bed (talk) 12:13, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some POV statements need to be corrected 

message: According to this link http://philippinelaw.info/statutes/bp455.html the opening date was 1983 Gbawden (talk) 11:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening Date
Talk:List of tallest buildings in San Diego

message: After working on this for the last few weeks, I have nominated the list at FLC. If anyone notices any errors, please bring them up so they can be addressed. Good job to everybody that contributed to the article. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:22, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed Strata from the under construction section and the First and Island from the proposed section until the height has been determined. Below is the details so far so it can be readded to the article if necessary. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FLC nomination

message: The Pinnacle on the Park building needs an article.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:11, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pinnacle on the Park 

message: In the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan 2004 on page 51 it is specified that "the FAA has established a 2.3 mile circling radius around SDIA" and "in order to accommodate the circling approach into SDIA, the city has put in place zoning restrictions which prohibit construction of structures greater than 500ft in height within the FAA established circling radius"
So I've updated the height restriction radius from 1.5 to 2.3 miles RacingAnteater (talk) 06:51, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of FAA mandated height restriction 

message: Should proposed buildings be included in a sub-list on this article? For instance Seaport Village is proposing a 500 foot tower. RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 23:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed buildings
Talk:One America Plaza

message: The complete sections Features and Amenities are copied and pasted from . That site explicitly states that their text cannot be reused. Roothog (talk) 22:01, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Infringing text was removed. -- Robocoder (t|c) 14:02, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio
Talk:HMS Indefatigable

message: Battle honours in the Royal Navy and other Commonwealth navies that are awarded to individual ships are inherited by subsequent ships to carry the name. Check other other disambiguation pages of Royal Navy ships and you will see battle honours have also been added. Hammersfan (talk) 17:08, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Got any examples  could share with me? I just viewed about 30 or 40 ship Royal Navy ships chosen at random from :Category:Royal Navy ship names and didn't find any "battle honours" sections. Could be a statistical fluke since I have no idea what percentage of ships have battle honours. I note that the section you created doesn't explain what a battle honour is or link to an explanation, which makes me concerned that we're generating lot of confusion and clutter on what should probably be a simple page. Has this been discussed somewhere? Thanks! —jameslucas ▄▄▄ ▄ ▄▄▄ ▄▄▄ ▄ 17:26, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: HMS Invincible, HMS Ark Royal, HMS Valiant, HMS Warspite, HMS Queen Elizabeth, HMS Manchester, HMS Glasgow, HMS Sheffield, HMS Coventry, HMS Brilliant, HMS Ardent, HMS Illustrious, HMAS Australia, HMAS Melbourne, HMAS Sydney, HMAS Canberra, HMCS Toronto, HMCS Algonquin, HMCS Halifax - it's obviously a long process, but these are some examples from the Royal Navy, Royal Australian Navy and Royal Canadian Navy Hammersfan (talk) 17:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

text: A small note stating that the "ship's named "insert name" have earned the following [Battle honour#Naval battle honours|battle honours] that are carried by later ships of the same name", or something along those lines to help readers understand. Llammakey (talk) 11:28, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Battle honours
Talk:Briza media

message: I had wanted to add a photo gallery to this page, showing a full flower heads and a single spikelet. The illustration is good and technically correct but does not immediately speak to a beginner.  However, in preview the gallery sat too low on the page, so I have just added a single image for now. Later, if I can flesh out the text, there may be room for more pictures.
This is my first major contribution to a Wikipedia page so I'm still learning. I'm not sure that I've got the optimal layout yet. In particular, how the photo sits relative to the "This article is a stub" section. Dluogs (talk) 01:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo added
Talk:Polish underground press

message: Other products on this market included cassettes, videocassettes, postcards, stamps, and calendars.
Given that ownership of domestic video equipment was extremely rare in comunist countries is it correct to assume that the video cassettes were intended to be smuggled out of Poland for foreign consumption ? 213.40.99.132 (talk) 21:32, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Video
Talk:Substantivism

message: This article should either be deleted or expanded. There is much more information in the Economic anthropology article. Erpava 04:05, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say expanded. Economic_anthropology#Substantivism does indeed have a lot more information.  We could shorten the article on the Ec. Anthro. page and make this one longer. That'd be my suggestion. Dan Cottrell (talk) 21:38, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Alternatively, we can merge it into The formalist vs substantivist debate (which I'm proposing to rename). Qzekrom (talk) 23:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete/Expand/Merge
Talk:HMS Invincible

message: Text and references copied from HMS Invincible to Attack on HMS Invincible,  See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution
Talk:Dominick and Eugene

message: Closing line didn't keep neutral point of view (WP:NPOV)so removed. Could probably be rewritten as description of fame of the long shot if exists in creditable commentary like a reputable review.Jack Godell (talk) 12:45, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: this movie was released same year as Rainman...also bout two brothers, well you know the story. I always tell people, 'Forget Rainman, watch Dominick and Eugene'. a much better movie. 76.218.248.127 (talk) 14:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  same year, time, place??
Talk:USS Pickerel

message: F-3 (hull number SS-22), a US Navy submarine predating the two Pickerels listed here, bore the name Pickerel during development--though it was changed to F-3 before launch date.  Should the list be amended to have F-3 as the earliest Pickerel?
F-3's Navsource page:
http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/08022.htm
72.177.85.148 04:23, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Theological College of Lanka

message: This article seems to contain a great deal of opinionating about the development of Christianity in Sri Lanka.
If this is the author's opinion, it is POV and original research, and should be deleted.
If this is a commonly accepted position, sources showing this must be cited. --Alvestrand 04:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Identity" discussion - POV speculation or referring to accepted sources?
Template talk:User WP Discrimination

message: I think WP Discrimination should be a neutral standpoint because some people are against discrimination and others have a different view on it (such as me). The photo, a fist which is anti-discrimination is taking one side, perhaps we can find a more neutral photo for this project's userbox? Afterall its WP:Discrimination not WP:Anti-Discrimination. --Girdi 04:36, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV
Talk:Hana Hou!

message: I found Hana Hou! when I was researching paniolos (Hawaiian cowboys).  Struck by the high quality of its feature articles, I ended up learning enough to write a stub about it.
I've since read more and have found it a fine source of information on a variety of topics.  I'm providing this bit of background here in case a question arises about why I've been adding Hana Hou! citations to other articles: I have no connection to the magazine ;-)  — Athaenara  ✉  04:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This article
Talk:Humanism and Its Aspirations

message: Section on "Past AHA Presidents" doesn't belong here. Clearly they didn't all sign, as Asimov died in 1990.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.45.141.155 (talk) 02:18, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The primary beliefs contradict one another. Ethics are said to be due to self-interest. Then, there is a lot of mealy-mouthed talk about "social... humane...benefit society", with no suggestion that they are due to self-interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.29.112 (talk) 12:39, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 
Talk:Denare Beach

message: You have reverted my edit to reinsert a native name.  To support your edit, you added this source.  At that source, click on "Denare Beach", and the native name was submitted by this dead link. I'm soon going to hit #3 revert, so could you please revert your edit until you are able to find a reliable source.  Thanks for your cooperation. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:10, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Its usually fairly easy to find sources by googling the name or using wayback machine for dead links so I've added that. Poketama (talk) 12:07, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native name
Talk:Subsidence (atmosphere)

message: The article says "Subsidence generally causes high barometric pressure". Is this correct or should it be "Subsidence generally raises barometric pressure" or "Subsidence generally causes higher barometric pressures"? 92.0.230.198 (talk) 10:04, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barometric pressure 

message: this article needs to be soured think youOo7565 04:59, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  why tag was added 

message: The following sentence in this article does not make sense.
'Subsiding air is cold and dry and rises atmospheric pressure forming a high-pressure or anticyclonic area '
Problem is 'and rises' whereas in previous sentence it says warm air rises. 
Does the author mean '.. and rising atmospheric pressure forms a high-pressure or anticyclonic area.'  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.238.200.54 (talk) 10:45, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect syntax??
Talk:Brioni Agreement

message: This article says startlingly little about Croatia's participation. -Oreo Priest talk 03:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Croatia

message: Please refrain from removing sourced material, such behaviour may be interpreted as disruptive. Also, please refrain from "renaming" Croatia and Slovenia in the article as "SR" (Socialist Republic) - they were not called SRs for quite a long time before the agreement - more than half a year as a matter of fact, and were declared independent a couple of weeks before the agreement itself. Finally, I reverted name of the islands to the WP:COMMONNAME. Please do not modify it either, the name is not only common, but it is also the contemporary name. Cheers.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:24, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of sourced material 
Talk:Kennon Road

message: Seems that there was a false reference that stated that race car drivers were doing the drive up Kennon Road in 30 minutes. It read: "Seasoned locals, race car drivers and motorsports enthusiasts, due to better road conditions, are now completing the drive under 30 to 25 minutes."
Reference linked to this website that I was able to confirm only by using the WayBack Machine: City of Pines 
There was no such mention.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fchagascorreia (talk • contribs) 09:58, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Reference? 

message: Hello! I am new to Wikipedia and was wondering if the phrasing of the first couple of sentences under "History" would count as too general. The way the phrase "Americans" is used feels a bit broad and seems to act in such a way that it characterizes a whole country (almost biased in a way). Is this incorrect? Skweemp (talk) 15:56, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Specificity?
Talk:Colon Street

message: Colon Street is said to be the oldest street in the country, but I have yet to find proper historical references that establishes this fact. Perhaps, editors from Cebu can help. havagut 02:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
Talk:EDSA

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
----
* :EDSA (road) → 
* :EDSA → 
– Much of the subtopics under EDSA disambiguation page are related to or connected with EDSA, meaning it has gained the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Also, the page readership stats: EDSA (road) = 3,853 readers as compared to EDSA (company) = mere 221 readers. So there is no need to disambiguate if it is the real primary topic. The disambiguation page will go to EDSA (disambiguation). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:57, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: EDSA titles a page with significant content and so it is ineligible as a target, new title unless it is also proposed to be renamed. This request has been altered to reflect that fact. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. put'r there 06:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can you give an example? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 01:09, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, pageview stats here: []. The People Power Revolution (AKA EDSA I, or EDSA Revolution) gets the most page views by far. The street gets similar page views to the other 2 revolutions and the shrine.--Ortizesp (talk) 01:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I know but that's not what we're talking about here. You don't call these topics "EDSA" alone nor do you call these with a disambiguation for the road like "EDSA (road) Revolution" and "EDSA (road) Shrine". The proposal here is to determine which is the primary topic for "EDSA", the company or the road. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 02:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The revolutions are sometimes called EDSA I, II, and III, and they are all listed on the DAB, I think that's close enough. I think it's more useful to keep it as is although I understand where you guys are coming from.--Ortizesp (talk) 03:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  the revolutions are related and tied to the road itself. For example, EDSA 1 is the focal point of the revolution that toppled the Marcos regime. Before that revolution it was more or less known as "Epifanio De Los Santos Avenue" or to the older folks, "Highway 54". But since the revolution people and nearly all media agencies here call the thoroughfare "EDSA", and EDSA is the first word that almost all Filipinos refer to the road. This is undoubtly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of the name EDSA. Unless this highway will be renamed (which is unlikely as of today). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:44, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 April 2021
Talk:Prognosis

message: Err.. Isn't this also a video by Neil Cicierega? Sonic  —Preceding undated comment added 20:47, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prognosis data for various diseases is very difficult to find because there is no centralized place to collect the data.  I think a comprehensive list (with references) of what prognostic information is available would be very useful. Particularly for health care workers that need to know the data for many different kinds of diseases.
Wikipedia is the perfect way to do this because everyone can contribute. Rnielsen7222 (talk) 18:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Prognosis data
Talk:List of Polish dishes

message: To my knowledge, the definition of podpiwek is wrong. It is not beer and is non-alcoholic, for a start.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.75.167.214 (talk) 23:45, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Podpiwek 

message: "This dish is also called staro wiejski ("old village")." "Starowiejski" is an adjective that means "of (from) an old village" if you have to be so literal. I'd say "country".
Grochówka is made of peas ("groch")
# pieczeń - it's just roast meat, don't overcomplicate
# budyń - I think you english-speaking people would call it a thick custard, sometimes very thick (when it's made as an ingredient of a cake). We usually just buy instant budyń in a shop
# podpiwek was one of the by-products of home breweries (I can't find the right book right now), no alkohol as far as I remember
# kawior z bakłażana - it's eggplant's flesh (no skin), fried and flavoured. Come on, we don't translate "spotted dick" word by word, do we?
# korycinski cheese - it's just a sort of cheese - should it be treated as a dish?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.76.108.143 (talk) 11:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some comments 
Talk:Negros Navigation

message: Hey deleting my edit is stupid on your side even if you are a senior here you don't have any kind of touch just to make your articles more good looking and ORGANIZE.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Manager0916 (talk • contribs) 14:44, January 1, 2011
:I looked through the editing history of this article, and didn't see the edit to which you refer above. Re other articles where you have inserted bolded text, see MOS:BOLD. Re alleged stupidity, please see WP:CIVILITY and WP:NPA. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 23:00, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Make the page attractive and organized

message: There has been a major realignment of shipping in the Philippines which therefore necessitates a realignment of the various articles.  There is a joint discussion involving 2GO, SuperFerry, Negros Navigation, Cebu Ferries, and Supercat at Talk:SuperFerry --Bruce Hall (talk) 11:12, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Realignment of industry requires realignment of articles
Talk:Swagger (Flogging Molly album)

message: Replaced the song titles with the correct ones from Amazon.  Don't know where the others came from but they were wrong. Papercrab 05:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song Titles 
Talk:Port of Manila

message: I think the geographical district of Manila known as the Port Area is not covered well enough in this article, considering that Port Area, Manila redirects here. Someone the Person (talk) 18:44, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Port Area, Manila]] redirects here

message: I added two pictures here. One picture of Cranes towering over many informal settlers there at the port. And one picture showing the manila skyline in the background taken from a ship docked at the harbor.Matikas 0805 (talk) 18:42, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  added pictures 

message: Article copyedited. The article originally varied between US and Commonwealth spellings. I have edited to standardize to US spelling. --NellieBly (talk) 07:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit

message: I'm assuming that the container throughput for the Port of Manila is a typo; 2,665 teus should probably be on the order of 2,665,000 if it were to rank that highly among world container ports.172.191.48.158 (talk) 23:45, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Container Throughput
Talk:Sowerby, West Yorkshire

message: The IPA pronunciation is entirely incorrect. Only people who have never been to the place say it in that way. The correct way to say it is 'sɔːbi' which preserves the original Norse pronunciation. Prybeck (talk) 22:10, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:RV670

message: Would http://www.teamati.com/DirectX%2010_1%20White%20Paper%20v0.4.pdf count as a proper source and therefore could be used in the article? It's not hosted at an official site, but the content looks official (see the copyrights at the bottom) so it could a a leaked paper.
Its contents would confirm the 3800 Series designation as well as DirectX 10.1 support. 86.147.209.131 15:04, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That certainly looks official.  I'll add it as an external link. -- Imperator3733 17:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible leaked paper as source?