Talk:Slade Green

message: @86.173.103.127. I have deleted your entire sub section about a so-called local dispute about addresses. It is a barely disguised personal agenda not based on good references. You do give two citations, one, Hansard, is obviously good, but it isn't about Slade Green or about London-Kent, not even indirectly. The other one is not a good source. I have kept the Hansard citation because it is good in the right place, so I have put it in the Pembrokeshire article. It would also fit well in the Royal Mail article. Please try to get familiar with some basic WP principles and rules before putting in such poorly referenced personal opinion. If this issue of 'counties' was as simple as your input makes out, there would not be such contradiction and confusion throughout society and in hundreds of WP articles. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 05:45, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Please sign your posts and having a user name does have some advantages, if you are so inclined. Thhat you for your constructive additions to the article. Regarding Kent, I agree with most of what you say about the confusion caused when handling UK counties on Wikipedia, with one important exception. If UK counties are confusing for the average reader then it is our job to make it less confusing, based on the facts. It is certainly not our job to twist the facts to suit. Your latest edit nicely rolls off the tongue but grammatically it makes no sense so it will have to go. I suggest that if you want change then the only way to do it is to lobby for change here . In the meantime, as you will see, guidelines allow reference to the historic/traditional county in the lead of an article.  In this case, being in Kent is notable and relevant. I could cite it if needed but that seems unnecessary. It would be easy, if you wanted to do it, to make it succinctly clear that Slade Green is within Greater London and the non-metropolitan county of Kent, which,as two administrative ares, would be odd. But that is not what is being stated or claimed. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 04:19, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  County 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Slade Green. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.molas.org.uk/pages/siteSummariesDetailsAll.asp?year=summaries1997
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071007124446/http://www.genealogy.com/genealogy/users/h/i/l/Julie-M-Hilliard/index.html to http://www.genealogy.com/genealogy/users/h/i/l/Julie-M-Hilliard/index.html
*Added  tag to http://www.bexley.gov.uk/service/consultations/conservationareas_phase2/pdfs/oak_road_conservation_area.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.bexley.gov.uk/service/environ/regeneration/pdfs/mm_baselinesummaryreport_06.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10042136
*Added  tag to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/bound_map_page.jsp?first=true&u_id=10042136&c_id=10001043
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110514012308/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10025746 to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10025746
*Added  tag to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/bound_map_page.jsp?first=true&u_id=10025746&c_id=10001043
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120412051321/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10152550 to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10152550
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:26, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified