lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Process of elimination

message: This entire wiki page is all wrong. Process of Elimination is not only for taking tests. It's also for differential diagnosis in medicine, taxonomy etc... It's used for many many many different things and not just multiple choice questions on tests. This page needs to be re-written.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.233.52.194 (talk) 23:40, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed 2601:143:C780:F80:895D:D5B4:CAF2:E531 (talk) 00:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

text: I'll start by mentioning other applications than exam testing. Mikael Häggström (talk) 12:48, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope
Talk:British Rail Class 334

message: Please check your facts before posting on this article. I had to fix a few things this morning.
There were always 40 Junipers.
Sources:
http://www.spt.co.uk/rail/juniper.html
I've also tidied up the announcement system to reflect what she actually says. If you don't know, don't make it up.
Thanks.
> The announcement system is not able to display tailed letters on screen and instead uses capitals. [eg luGGaGe]
Who the hell is doctor flange?!
This is actually almost true. Due to the size, sentances like "We are now approaching Ayr" appear as "We are now aPProachin9 AYr". The PIS screens are not big enough to show the tailed letters properly. 82.40.75.55 12:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Facts

message: In what way are the 334's so unreliable.
Mainly because they are new trains, they are unrelianle :-D
I believe there have been technical difficulties with the fleet.
82.40.75.55 21:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreliability

message: The Class 334s we’re built 1999-01 same build date as the Class 333s 2A01:4B00:854C:2A00:DF3:A71B:AC35:B0D6 (talk) 11:13, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Source? - David Biddulph (talk) 11:15, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Build Date
Talk:James Yorkston

message: "None of them, however, are actually athletes, indeed the accordion player - the renowned Scottish musican Reuben Taylor, has been seen smoking a pipe."
! Whatever precludes an athlete from smoking a pipe? Njál 19:39, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vote to move this sentence to [[Wikipedia:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted_Nonsense]] 
Talk:Stickies (Apple)

message: hey, I just wanted to say that the screenshot is possibly a bit out of date, and that a better one can be displayed. (go to the site and see)
Which site? Apple's? But I agree, the current screenshot is horrible, would replace it right now if my OS wasn't set to a different language. --88.74.133.104 (talk) 12:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: better image

message: I attempted to add a single line of information about the very similar (and free) Windows application of the same name, and was told I was vandalizing. I have no idea how to contact whoever reverted the article as the contact me link led to a nonsense page lots of random folks had vandalized themselves!
Yeah, I have the stickies for Windows!  I could take a screenshot, but I don't know how to upload them, and of course an image sharing site would give me limited bandwidth, most likely.71.120.42.89 (talk) 21:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Honest Edits

message: A note should be made that there is a difference between the Stickies Application and the Stickies Dashboard Widget, mainly in the appearance (the application is just a straight-edge rectangle wheras the dashboard widget looks like a 3-dimensional post it note).136.176.102.80 07:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: App vs Dashboard

message: Desktop notes isn't that the same article? --mabdul 0=* 20:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is about Mac's. --Staka (T) 22:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I don't think it is needed to merge, this article is about the Mac application, not the general term about it. John 10:55, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with JohnHWiki, and I see that mabdul has not made further comments, so I've taken the proposal down. --朝彦 (Asahiko) (talk) 12:30, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I just edited to remove references to a specific third-party Windows app. It is irrelevant to this article and its references to specific features and positive reviews of that app made it function as an advertisement. noktulo (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of third-party app
Talk:Terry McMillan

message: I'm confused how opinions over Jonathan Plummer's intent or what happened with their relationship have anything to do with whether or not there should be a separate entry. I think there should be. Firstly, seeing as how redirecting to one person's page when looking for another seems very strange when there isn't even a section devoted to Plummer. Secondly, is there not enough information specific to him to warrent an entry, however short? Rugadh 22:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes, he should keep his own entry 

message: I'm surprised that McMillan's novels, even her most prominent, are being redirected to the films. The novels that weren't made into films have their own articles. That is, here least prominent works are the ones that we've created articles for. I believe redirecting these novels to the films has discouraged the creation of articles for these novels, which are clearly notable in their own right and which are barely mentioned in the articles about the films. —valereee (talk) 23:56, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  novels
Talk:Thirsty Ear Recordings

message: I'm considering creating an article on the Blue Series.  There are now at least a couple of dozen (probably more) releases in the series, and it's garnering high praise:
"The Blue Series, has been one of the most innovative things to come around in jazz, or any music, of late." -Newsweek.com
"Thirsty Ear's Blue Series...has carved a niche for themselves as instantly recognizable as '60s Blue Note or '70s ECM." -Village Voice
However, this main article on Thisty ear is pretty slight.  Is it silly to create on article on one subset of releases from the label when the main article is this slim?  Dayv 18:37, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.thirstyear.com/about_and_contact.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Gyrofrog  (talk) 21:40, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Pat & Mat

message: I've found information about at least 3 newly-produced episodes of the series on the Internet:
http://www-old.zlinfest.cz/en/film/detail?id=1525
http://www.fdb.cz/serial/pat-a-mat-pat-a-mat-na-venkove-papirovy-servis/90174
http://www.fdb.cz/film/pat-a-mat-na-venkove-postele/popis-obsah/63782 (two episodes listed)
There is almost no information about these anywhere else. I've tried to get into contact with the people from the official website, but got no respond.
Does anyone know anything about these episodes?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by M. Pažanin (talk • contribs) 01:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New episodes 

message: Found this while surfing on Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=918Lfkqfrqs
--85.191.27.236 (talk) 11:59, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A full version of Episode 50 

message: Why is it listed as 16th episode here, while it is 13th on every other wiki, including Czech? Xeoxer (talk) 16:59, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jumpers episode number 

message: no source for it "drawing ire" from censors2601:642:C481:4640:0:0:0:A3C (talk) 05:09, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation needed
Category talk:Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania

message: On this wiki page, Consolidated city-county, 
*Consolidated city-county
Philadelphia is listed. As such I am once again removing the county link.
evrik 19:13, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consolidated city-county 

message: Let's bring in a third party or put this up to a vote. evrik 20:49, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truce ?
Talk:Mykola Khvylovy

message: While making a disambig page Trostyanets, I failed to locate one in Kharkiv oblast. Is it an error in the article or there was a resubdivision? mikka (t) 19:23, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Which Trostyanets?

message: I have borrowed liberally from this article, giving credit at each opportunity. The article itself relies on a wealth of other sources. Someone knowledgeable about the subject could improve the article by going one level deeper to cite them as well. And someone who understands the nuts and bolts of Wiki citation shortcuts could make most of these footnotes more compact. Zeno Cosini~enwiki (talk) 17:53, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mykola Khvyl'ovyy and the making of Soviet Ukrainian literature"
Talk:Florida State Road 528

message: The subtitle "Future" is, of course, WP:CRYSTAL. When I tried to correct it, a newbie stated that was the guideline. Good grief! He was correct! Of course, it is nonsense. I have remonstrated with them on the Project Page, but only expect one or two answers, all of them fervently supporting WP:CRYSTAL or swearing that it doesn't violate it. I don't have time to fight this to an objective conclusion, so will drop it. But if Wikipedia improves (and sometimes it does) and changes this, look to change it here, as well. Thanks. Student7 (talk) 18:38, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Future

message: Readded "The border between Orange and Brevard Counties occurs between mile markers 35.9 and 36."  Please discuss here before removing again.  Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 13:25, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Border
Talk:Tight junction

message: Support.  As I understand it, the terms zona occludens and tight junction are interchangeable.
Grammar question: I'm no physiologist, but isn't "zonula occludens" singular?  The plural should be "zonulae occludentes."
Yes zona occludens and tight junction are interchangeable. I don't know a thing about latin (so somebody with some knowledge should answer the question above) but I have never seen the term "zonulae occludentes"  and since it is not used it shouldn't be in the article. --hroest 15:33, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions

message: if anyone is looking to improve this there is plenty of inspiration. Richiez (talk) 13:00, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great stuff in the French version of this article 

message: Tight junctions, also known as occluding junctions or zonulae occludentes (singular, zonula occludens) are multiprotein junctional complex whose general function is to prevent leakage of transported solutes and water and seals the paracellular pathway. Tight junctions may also served as leaky pathways by forming selective channels for small cations, anions, or water. Tight junctions are present only in vertebrates. The corresponding junctions that occur in invertebrates are septate junctions. 
(I would like to suggest some alterations to the first paragraph to expand upon the general function of tight junctions and include some references from this paper http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06485.x/abstract) 
--BearBait 21:14, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alterations to first praragraph 

message: The intro says that “Tight junctions are present mostly in vertebrates (with the exeption of Tunicates).” However, Tunicates are invertebrates.
Clarify?
CielProfond (talk) 20:15, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't found anything within recent years to specify this. There was one research article I was able to look at from 1986. I think we should just exclude this part until we can get more citations. JW302 (talk) 17:46, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tunicates 

message: The link that leads JAM proteins only brings it to one particular JAM. There is another article that would be much better. Junctional adhesion moleculeJW302 (talk) 15:53, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  JAM 

message: — Assignment last updated by Editorzcj (talk) 16:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BYU-Biophysics, CELL 568
Talk:British Rail Class 05

message: While the locomotive featured in these photographs IS a Hunslet 0-6-0DM, I do not think it is a British Rail Class 05. I am quite sure that it is a similar locomotive built for Industrial use.
Genuine British Rail Class 05s can be found on the Isle of Wight, a private site in Herefordshire and Preston Docks. AHEMSLTD 20:00, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Have flicked through a few books and I can confirm this locomotive was never owned by British Rail. It was built in 1957 for 'Stock' and finally sold to the NCB in 1962 for use in Derbyshire. It could well have been built at the same time as the first 05s but lacks mainline features. AHEMSLTD 16:17, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:   Hmm. I don't quite understand why it has a BR logo on the cab then. chowells 19:03, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographs at Didcot Railway Centre 

message: Since both the Andrew Barclay and Hunslet engines get called "Class 05" (see British Rail Class D2/5 and this article) I think a disambiguation page is a good idea, and move this page to "BR Class 05 (Hunslett)" or something else. Alternatively the articles could be merged into one - since despite having different manufacturers and part suppliers they appear to be similar enough to merge.
For the time being I've added a link in the lead about the other class 05s.Shortfatlad (talk) 15:11, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The Barclays are NOT listed as Class 05 in either of Marsden's latest definitive works (2011, October and 2011, November). best, Sunil060902 (talk) 19:03, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That's news to me. Years ago I was told there were two types, now someone rewrites history and its the gospel truth. 70.72.183.55 (talk) 02:22, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Two types of class 5 - page move
Talk:George E. Akerson

message: I reverted the edits from 81.131.149.9 because much of the detail is unnecessary, and the meta-information and formatting were gone. Pgengler 20:06, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I received his DoD information from the NYC Public Library Reference Department:
The information from the NYC Death Index is as follows:
                                                                             
 Surname | Given Name | Age  | Month | Day  | Year  |Certificate|  County   
          |            |      |       |      |       |  Number   |           
 ---------+------------+------+-------+------+-------+-----------+---------- 
 Akerson  |George      | 49 y |  Dec  |  21  | 1937  |   27240   |Manhattan  
I wasn't sure whether this should be added as a section of the Main Article or not. -- Michael David (talk) 21:43, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source re: DoD 
Talk:Besermyan

message: * The name of this people does not sounds as Bisermän – the real form is Besermyan (бесермянин, in Russian), or Beserman (бесерман in Udmurt&Besermyan). So, this article should be moved! The word «Bisermän» in the article also should be corrected.
* The sentence «They speak a Tatar-ified dialect of the Udmurt language» is without any doubt wrong. The language of Besermyans has approximately so much Tatar loanwords as other Udmurt dialects.
* The sentence «Their ancestors are thought to have been the tribes of Volga Bulgaria who spoke Finno-Ugric languages, were subsequently partly Tatar-ified and converted to Islam. After the conquest of Kazan in 1552 they were converted to Christianity by Ivan Grozny» seems to be entirely unsubstantiated: nobody knows surely about this situation.
So, if the community has nothing against it, I'll correct this article within a week. --Denis Sacharnych 20:12, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Some comments
Talk:The Bachelor Machine

message: Much of the plot synopsis is adapted from The SF Site review listed in the References section, including some wording lifted directly or almost directly from the review. However, this is not a copyright violation as I wrote the review and release the version in this encyclopedia article under the GFDL. When I find my copy of the book, I will add the plot of more of the stories and place them in the order they appear in the book.Kit 20:14, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: SFSite Review and this article
Talk:Prince regent

message: Cos can  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FB91:1AA9:507C:5823:CEB7:F245:1FA5 (talk) 02:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A prince is: 
*a son or other close male relative of a monarch; 
*a male member of a royal family other than the sovereign, especially (but not necessarily) the son of a sovereign.
Thus a prince regent might be, say, the sovereign's cousin. --Picapica 09:39, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why minority?

message: I have removed the phrase (or Prince Regnant, as a direct borrowing from French language) since prince regent is itself a direct borowing from the French "prince régent". 
"Prince regnant / prince régnant" means something slightly different, I believe: the regent of a principality (e.g. the Prince Regnant of Liechtenstein) as distinct from that of a kingdom (e.g. the Prince Regent of Belgium). --Picapica 09:52, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Prince Regnant" is nothing to do with a regent or regency.   It is a reigning prince,  the head of state of a sovereign principality.  "Regnant" means reigning.  Thats why Queen Elizabeth or Queen Margrethe are "queen regnant" but the Queen of Sweden or Norway are "queen consort".Eregli bob (talk) 00:40, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince regnant 

message: A prince regent is just a regent who also happens to be a prince. His powers and prerogatives do not differ at all from those of, say, a queen regent or an otherwise untitled regent. We do not have a separate article for queen regent, nor should we. It all belongs to Regent. Surtsicna (talk) 19:54, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point? 

message: Based on unsourced tabloids, it states that the Prince of Wales (Prince Charles) will become Prince Regent in May 2021. At this point that is speculation from newspapers. No announcement from Buckingham Palace or the Queen directly, has been issued. Unless and until such announcement is made, the section is an example of crystalballing and should be removed. 98.10.165.90 (talk) 22:57, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  crystalballing
Talk:Never Again

message: I removed a redirect to an albums talk page —MJBurrage • TALK • 21:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's a book by John Ashcrof that was recenlty featured on the daily show.  Mathiastck 15:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Ashcroft 

message: For future reference, other films titled Never Again:
* A 1910 silent comedy short starring Florence Lawrence
* A 1912 silent comedy short starring Edith Storey
* A 1914 silent comedy short starring Mr. & Mrs. Sidney Drew
* A 1915 silent western short written by, co-directed by, and starring Tom Mix
* A 1915 silent short starring William Collier
* A 1924 silent comedy short directed by and starring Al St. John
* A 1926 silent comedy short based on Sidney Smith's comic strip The Gumps
--ShelfSkewed Talk 19:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other films
Talk:Laws of thermodynamics

message: Shouldn't there be something on the popular (humorous) mnemonic summary of the 0-plus-3 laws?
(
	(0 - everyone is playing the game)
	1 - you can't win
	2 - you can't break even
	3 - you can't get out of the game
)
I mean, there *is* a "see also" link to Ginsberg's theorem at the very end,
but that's all.
What I mean is:
shouldn't there be something in the text of *this* article too,
likely even its own little section? [Contribution by editor Kayseychow 11 May 2021]
:This summary has been attributed to C. P. Snow; see for example this website. I agree that it might be interesting or amusing to add it as a concluding section. Dirac66 (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There is separate article for that: Ginsberg's theorem.--ReyHahn (talk) 22:18, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I see that it has been in the See also list of this article for 11 years, but I would never have thought to look there. So to help others, I have added a brief parenthetical note to the See also item. Now if someone searches for the words "can't win" or "can't break even", they will be directed to the right place. Dirac66 (talk) 23:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't there be something on the popular (humorous) mnemonic "you can't win, you can't break even, you can't get out of the game"? 

message: the subscripts should be defined, i don’t know if it’s right 192.184.204.28 (talk) 05:33, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  onsager section 

message: Maybe the history section should mention Mayer and Joule? DrKN1 (talk) 12:00, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Ways in which energy is lost in a ecosystem 105.113.106.24 (talk) 21:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biology
Talk:Midland Great Western Railway

message: Ewanduffy 20:52, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country name 

message: would the article look cleaner if the content on branch lines was in it's own section instead of in the header? Jeepday 14:45, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and I've changed it. Biscuittin (talk) 11:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections
Talk:Sweet Valley High

message: This article seriously needs a makeover to reach encyclopedia standards. There's POV all over the place, there's way too much unnecessary description, and it's very long. I'm not sure where to begin, but I'll start some of the rewording, particularly in the Sweet Valley High TV Show portion. Some of that wording is definitely POV. Lorilei Mackenzie (talk) 07:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Article is a Mess! 

message: Sweet Valley is a much shorter article covering much the same territory as this one. My case for using this name is that while Sweet Valley is the name of the town and the common name of most of the series, Sweet Valley High is by far the best known of the series and arguably the name used to refer to the whole thing, as per Moe's quote in this article. Thayvian 20:59, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: It seems that all characters, apart from the two main ones, fail notability. I am willing to convert them to redirects if they are no objections. -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:33, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor characters fails notability 

message: It says one of criticisms of the series is that none of the kids in the series suffer any weight issues. It seems that they are forgetting a certain Robin Wilson, who had been bullied by Jessica and her friends, because she was fat.--Splashen (talk) 04:58, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticisms

message: In the article, it states that Todd has a speech impediment. Where is this mentioned in the series?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.195.38.188 (talk) 10:42, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Todd Wilkins