lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Infobox tropical cyclone

message: add a Inflated parameter |  label74 = Inflated |   data75 =  line add {{#invoke:Check for unknown parameters | inflated |     124.106.195.79 (talk) 09:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose as inflation was dilliberately taken out of the infobox due to concerns being raised over it being original research in countries where USD is not the main currency and how hurricane damage is calculated. Jason Rees (talk) 10:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 March 2023 

message: Add a cycloneseason as page Typhoon Viola (1969) and data  122.52.70.111 (talk) 10:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I would strongly suggest that it isn't added since we are in the process of changing the infobox to Template:Infobox weather event.Jason Rees (talk) 11:38, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 May 2023 

message: :Template:Infobox tropical cyclone has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Noah, AATalk 15:07, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination for deletion of [[:Template:Infobox tropical cyclone]] 

message: Will the template be deleted if no more articles use it? Or would the template in other namespaces have to be removed as well? —JCMLuis 💬 16:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Amicable Grant

message: "Widespread passive resistance, with a growing threat of armed resistance, meant little money was raised and the project was dropped. King Henry VIII now lacked funds for his war in France and left with no other options, he made peace."  The last sentence reads funny.  I would place a comma after the word 'and'. LostInHistoria (talk) 22:44, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I added a comma and it reads much better now thanks! RBMBH (talk) 18:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  April 2023 

message: Hi! Called at the time "a benevolence", it was essentially a forced loan, a levy of between one sixth and one tenth on the goods of the laity and on one-third of the goods of the clergy. In this sentence you use dashes in some of your fractions, but not all. I suggest choosing one way to write it to make it the same throughout.  AlwaysSleepy4 (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch! I added dashes to the fractions without them. Thanks for your help! RBMBH (talk) 18:38, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small Edit 

message: "Causes" section only has one citation, at the very beginning. Definitely needs at least one more, if not two for the rest of the section. Jtk2023 (talk) 17:04, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, I went and added another citation to that section to give more credibility.  RBMBH (talk) 18:39, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional citation needed 

message: This was a really cool article edit! I wonder if adding any images may help the article stand out a bit more? I don't have any other advice for the article, since it was so well edited. Notarealperson2 (talk) 19:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks so much! I agree so I added a picture of Thomas Wolsey to the article as he is probably the person most closely tied to the Amicable Grant. RBMBH (talk) 18:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommendation
Talk:BDO International

message: Both BDO and Grant Thornton and BMR advisors articles state they are the 5th largest accounting firm worldwide. Clearly there is something not quite right. Is there an up-to-date list from a reputable 3rd party to establish the correct position. If not then the claim on both sites should be removed.--GazMan7 (talk) 17:16, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  5th Largest claim 

message: Should the articles on the individual countries companies be merged here? There are merge tags suggesting this on BDO Simpson Xavier and BDO Dunwoody. Please comment on this. D O N D E groovily Talk to me 04:16, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  Makes sense to me.  One or more can always be split out again if this article gets too large.  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 09:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with constituent companies 
Talk:BDO USA, P.C.

message: Tagged as having dubious NPOV as the addition does not speak on all of the relevant facts of the case.  Suggest modifying this to either delete this section or include a discussion on BDO's defense.  Furthermore, the second citation is solely just speculation at this point - this complaint has not been asserted in a court of law. Insbordnat (talk) 01:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Litigation - NPOV 

message: In May 2011 there was an update to the facts of the Miami Bank Fraud controversy.  As such, I'm suggesting updating the Miami Bank Fraud section (pending feedback) to state:  
In August 2007 a jury in Miami awarded Banco Espirito Santo $521.7 million--$170 million in compensatory damages and nearly $352 million in punitive damages--over allegedly negligent audits that BDO conducted on a corrupt Espirito Santo subsidiary. On June 23, 2010 the Third District Court of Appeal of the state of Florida unanimously overturned the 2007 jury verdict against BDO, ruling that the firm had been denied a fair trial, and ordered that the case be retried in the 11th Circuit Court. Court Overturns $521.7M Verdict in BDO Case, Accounting Today,  June 23, 2010 In May of 2011, BDO USA, LLP entered into confidential settlement agreement with Banco Espirito Santo which resolved the lawsuit against BDO. BDO USA Settles Bankest Suit With Former Client Banco Espirito Santo, Bloomberg,  May 5, 2011 
 
Pending any objections or discussion, I'd like to make the change to this section on January 24th. (JAMorrissey (talk) 22:25, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates to the Miami Bank Fraud Controversy 

message: Seems pretty basic information to include in an encyclopedia article on the company. More importantly, this article reads like an advertisement, brochure, or press release by the firm itself. Needs stricter, non-biased editing. Benefac (talk) 23:04, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does the acronym "BDO" come from?
Talk:Double majority

message: Quote "Passing of government bills requires only a simple majority whereas private members' bills and motions have to be passed by majorities of members in both the geographical and functional constituencies independently"
Another Quote "Amendments to The Basic Law require a two-thirds vote in the Legislative Council, without a specific requirement in each group of constituencies"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legislative_Council_of_Hong_Kong#Procedure  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 42.3.231.59 (talk) 16:02, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about double majority vs supermajority in Hong Kong?
Talk:Keogh plan

message: "A person could have a traditional defined benefit plan with a corporation, and a self-employed person can have a defined-benefit Keogh. Likewise a large company could have a defined-contribution plan like a 401(k) or 401(a) money purchase plan; likewise HR 10 plans could be set up as defined-contribution plans for self-employed earners as well."
This seems to be a string of random facts.  In the first sentence, does this mean the same person could have a plan with a corporation and a Keogh on the side from their own business???  Or is this an attempt at a comparison between an employeed person's plan and the self-employed person's plan???  "Likewise..." = this setenence does not communicate anything to me.  It does a poor job of differentiating a Keogh vs. other plans, and it does not explain anything about Keogh plans.  This needs much more clarification.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.186.224.74 (talk) 20:25, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: clarification

message: What's the average management cost for  a Keogh plan? I'll go look, with an eye to adding a sentence if I can find someting reliable. -- Jo3sampl (talk) 19:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question
Talk:Octroi

message: This page needs a serious rewrite. It is based almost entirely on the 1911 Encyclopaedia Britannica which is, surprise, surprise, OUT OF DATE!. Octroi was abolished in France in 1948, as the linked French Wikipedia article makes clear (see :fr:Octroi).  It is also concerned almost entirely with the situation in France and ignores other countries except in passing. I will make a start on updating.... Emeraude 12:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously out-of-date 

message: Therefore the last paragraph is wrong. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Octroi-to-stay-in-Mumbai/articleshow/40186770.cms
Afrank86 (talk) 14:27, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mumbai still has Octroi - the change was never done 
Talk:Partnership taxation in the United States

message: Dear fellow editors: I made a few edits, mostly cosmetic, with some substantive tweaking as well. Yours, Famspear 04:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A few substantive edits; mostly minor tweaking

message: Hi, I made a big edit so that it would be easy to revert.  I divided the article into sections and rearranged the content a bit (without adding much I must add) to strengthen the focus on partnership taxation as opposed to partnerships in general.  More could be done, but not over opposition.EECavazos 08:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Partition into sections

message: I'll put in a section on allocations (704(b)) in the next few days.EECavazos 02:17, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Allocations

message: I think a section devoted to contributions including within some background on capital accounts may be helpful.EECavazos 01:15, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contributions

message: Maybe some content on the changes that occurred in 1986 would add value to the article. EECavazos (talk) 22:35, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History/impact
Talk:PKF International

message: Corporate marketing and corporate information is not worthy for inclusion in this medium. If allowance is given for this topic, then any and all companies, partnerships, and corporations will feel a need to include their marketing gimmicks and marketing materials within it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.32.50.202 (talk) 18:06, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: PKF is the 10th largest accounting firm in the world! Brookie :)  { - he's in the building somewhere!}  (Whisper...) 09:49, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this noteworthy for Wikipedia?  
Talk:Rates (tax)

message: The intro to this article does not say in what way "Rates" specialize "Property Tax".  If there is no difference, then why not just redirect to "Property Tax"?  If no one can be bothered to point out in what way "Rates" specialize "Property Tax" then who added the "High Importance" marker? Jim Bowery (talk) 14:01, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abysmal Intro 

message: As I recall from living a year in England, the council tax is levied on the occupant of a house, not on the owner.  This distinguishes rates from other property taxes, which are levied on the owner, not the occupant.  The article should clarify this issue.  I don't consider my personal recollection a reliable source and I'm not certain how this applies to the occupant of a flat (etc.)  --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 17:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who pays rates? 

message: I propose this article be merged with property tax, per the comment above and the substantial overlap in coverage. Having two articles with the same country coverage makes maintenance difficult. Compare Ireland in both articles, for example. --agr (talk) 14:05, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Registered education savings plan

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more organization and detail than would be expected of a Stub (although it requires more referencing and in-line citations), and of low importance, as it is a highly specialized topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 16:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... this copy is commonly used by financial services companies to descripe the official definition of what are Registered Education Savings Plans as per the Canadian Government (CRA) on CanLearn.ca --216.191.141.130 (talk) 17:22, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it was my mistake, and it's been copied from here to other places. Squinge (talk) 17:43, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 
Talk:Alexander Radó

message: * Where is this name Shandor Rado comes from? He was Sándor Radó or did he used the Shandor abroad? - Hu Totya 20:41, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shandor Rado?

message: The sentence about Roessler being a conduit for British schemes seems to be an outsider hypothesis, not necessarily fact.--Radh (talk) 07:59, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Intelligence Knowledge?

message: :Sándor Radó → Alexander Rado — When checking what articles link to this one I noticed several links from the redirect "Sandor Rado" that were about a totally different person (I have since disambiguated these links to Sandor Rado (psychoanalyst). It seems there's another notable person going by the name of Sandor Rado, and considering the subject of this article is more widely known by the name "Alexander Rado", maybe that would be a better choice for the article title. -- œ™ 23:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As there was no opposition to this proposal, I have now moved the article. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  What on earth is the source for "Alexander Rado"? Library of Congress only recognizes "Sándor Radó", and "Alexander Radó" redirects to it. Also, the disambiguation should have gone to Sándor Radó (psychoanalyst). --Mlang.Finn (talk) 17:41, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest renaming article title to avoid confusion?

message: p.73 Roessler approaches Schneider.  scope_creepTalk 19:44, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Lucy book
Talk:RSM Robson Rhodes

message: As Robson Rhodes is no longer a member firm of RSM International and is therefore not allowed to use the RSM prefix, could this article be updated to remove the RSM prefix before the companies name?  Same for RSM Moffat?
Zimrow 12:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove reference to RSM in company name 
Talk:Taxation in Russia

message: I am currently rewriting the article in my sandbox: User:NVO/IM. WP:OWN notwithstanding, please consult me if you plan to edit the text. It will take a week to shape up and properly reference the new version. NVO (talk) 10:46, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

message: * Done NVO (talk) 19:59, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Heather Goldenhersh

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Edofedinburgh 16:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I have worked on this article and i still need more information on her so please help. --Musicaltheatrewiz 20:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be glad to add info as I find it, with references. I enjoyed her work on stage in Doubt and I think she's one of the best actresses on TV. RahadyanS 05:03, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please Listen 
Talk:Self-directed IRA

message: The term "self-directed IRA" is not a proper name. There is no official IRA type by that name. IRS documents do not capitalize it just as they do not capitalize "traditional IRA". I will be changing the title and the typography of the article to reflect this. Jojalozzo 21:13, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Self-directed IRA" is not a proper name 

message: Most of the references in these articles similarly consist of promotional links to commercial websites. I plan to remove them. See WP:LINKSPAM. . . Mean as custard (talk) 19:17, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there is no reason to be using corporate websites as sources when the same information should be available from govt and academic sources. VQuakr (talk) 06:03, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

text: Perusing the article, I think this needs stubbification and a fundamental rewrite. , what do you think? VQuakr (talk) 07:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Gold IRA]], [[Custodian bank]]
Talk:Red Mountain Resort

message: I just heard the ad on TV the other night - they identified Red as being in the "Kootenay Rockies".  Well, the Kootenay Rockies would have to be the ones east of Cranbrook and Invermere, and this is two whole mountain ranges away (the Purcells are in between, and Red's in the Rossland Range of the Monashee Mountains, NOT the Rockies).  This should be in the article somewhere - that the resort's ad company got it wrong - but not sure how to put it without being sorta POV (resort marketing people take note, and also pls note guidelines at WP:COI.Skookum1 20:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but so what who cares?  Wikipedia Notability does not take in government rebranding campaigns as factual or meaningful in any other way than being marketing agendas.  If Mom & Pop and the Kids think thsee are the Rockies, and are told by the govenrment that they're Rockies, they'll start to think that they ARE the Rockies.  In any case, othegr C Govt ministries/agencies have other names for vaiorus areas, and all ahve different boundaries, and few of them jibe with tourism-ministry promotiona areas.  Wikipedia is not going to model itself on what hte BC Government's advertising agencies tell them to call itself.Skookum1 (talk) 13:20, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Red Resort's advertising campaign

message: Slavish content from resort brochure materials deleted and converted to wikistyle.Skookum1 (talk) 13:22, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: De-brochurized
Talk:Starve the beast

message: This article's opening description is politically motivated trash: you can't control overspending by reducing the revenue of an operating entity; you have to reduce how much it actually spends. Reducing the amount for spending only results in increased debt. The article describes the intent, but not the practical results of the policy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.112.223.8 (talk) 19:03, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is about a politically biased political strategy, which will feel like politically motivated trash to those who disagree with the strategy. The article lead should simply accurately state the strategy. I agree that there should be room for the observation that seemingly no amount of tax cuts for the rich is sufficient to "starve" the military-industrial complex. – wbm1058 (talk) 13:08, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Politically Biased

message: I don't believe that the five paragraphs added to the end of the "Economic Analysis" section meet Wikipedia's guidelines for content. It appears to have facts and figures that are verifiable (though they should use Wikipedia's citation format, not parenthetical citations), but it does not seem to meet the guidelines for neutral point of view and no original research. To be honest, the edit reads more like an essay written for a class than anything that belongs on a Wikipedia page. 
— Brzac (talk) 16:47, 19 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit on 13 Jan 2020 by 184.75.127.195 does not meet guidelines 

message: Social security is defered wages earned by workers and matched by employers. It is administered by the government but not funded by the government. 2604:3D09:CD7D:7C00:69C1:E33F:CD43:73DD (talk) 17:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social Security
Talk:Substantially equal periodic payments

message: Could we have an example of the three kinds of distributions, say with:
* IRA with value of $100,000
* Owner at age of 40 with life expectancy of 80
with the output showing what the periodic payments would be on an annual basis.
I could give this a shot but I have never made this calculation before and would appreciate someone to verify my numbers. Kevinp2 23:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I do not think this is necessarily true.  Cite?  See chart here:  http://www.investopedia.com/university/retirementplans/rothira/rothira3.asp#axzz21gD0RtsN— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.4.168.131 (talk) 23:27, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: In particular, Roth IRA distributions taken under the SEPP rule will be taxed as income a second time --- a substantial penalty.

message: Rather than just a barrage of rules, could some helpful soul knowledgeable in this area please add some explanations of why this thing exists, who it benefits, how it came to be, how it compares with mechanisms in other retirement accounts, other countries, etc.?  --Doradus (talk) 17:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significance, history, comparison to other schemes, etc. 
Talk:Surtax

message: Wikinews is linking to "Supertax" on Wikipedia in reference to France's proposed 75% tax, but there's no mention of it here.  106.120.24.25 (talk) 08:37, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supertax 
Talk:Tallage

message: Tallage is not mentioned in the Magna Carta. Relief, scutage, and aid are mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luan Hanratty (talk • contribs) 13:59, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

message: It would appear that "tallage" sometimes refers to payments to a party other than the king. This petiton from CPR (between 1381 & 1385) appears to speak of tallage.
http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C9061139
Reference:	SC 8/20/983
Description:	
Petitioners: Walter de Totyngton (Tottington), monk of Bury St Edmunds.
Name(s): de Totyngton (Tottington), Walter
Addressees: King, Chancellor and council.
Occupation: monk of Bury St Edmunds
Nature of request: Walter de Totyngton states that amongst other liberties it has been granted to the abbey of Bury St Edmunds by the king's progenitors that no tallage shall be demanded from their tenants, the townspeople of Bury St Edmunds, except in case of necessity, and with the express consent of the monks, certain rebels, on pretext of good reasons, but really to maintain the quarrel of the provisor in the Court of Rome, and their other crimes, have levied very large tallages from these tenants.Rdmoore6 (talk) 15:55, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks as though the "rebels" did so in the name of their putative king. --Bejnar (talk) 04:54, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of tallage in England
Talk:Tariff of 1824

message: The article states that these (1816, 1824, 1833, etc.) import tariffs benefited the North at the expense of the South, which relied on foreign manufactured goods and open foreign markets for its cotton.
Why is it that the North did not also rely on foreign manufactured goods?  Even if the factories were largely located in the North, wouldn't they have wanted to sell some of their output to the South -- this seems like normal and sensible means of increasing profits, the whole reason factories exist.
Even if the answer is "obvious," it should still be clarified, even if only in passing.
-- Henryxmartin (talk) 21:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why did the South oppose the Tariff but not the North?