Talk:Psychosynthesis

message: This article needs a LOT of work, a major problem being that it gives virtually no idea of the goals or scope of Psychosynthesis. The companion article, on Roberto Assagioli M.D., the founder of Psychosynthesis needs much improving also. Kwork 00:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, this article still needs a lot of work. Too bad there's no knowledgeable student of Assagioli's around who gives a crap about Wikipedia, huh? Maybe if one comes along, he'll fix up this article. Eaglizard 22:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  While it needs work, I wonder why the "Egg Diagram" was removed??? Magicalpath 09:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope 

message: I have not had time to read the article through, but it appears that the person who wrote it has very good first hand knowledge of Psychosynthesis. Nevertheless, Wikipedia articles need to cite published sources; and, without that, any statements not supported by sources could be deleted at any time. Please add sourcing. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 00:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: citing sources

message: I've added some more sources and I have started to clean up the article... Assagioli being a bit of a mystic is not an excuse for the article being vague. Sankhambi (talk) 20:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Work Started

message: This article starts out with the words, which I think correct: "Psychosynthesis is an original approach to psychology that was developed by Roberto Assagioli, M.D." But the diagram used is John Firman's variation, instead of the diagram Assagioli chose to use. I will soon remove the Firman diagram, unless someone can give me a good reason not to. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 12:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems important to have the diagram -- this article being on Psychosynthesis and not Assagioli, why not use any commonly accepted rendering? (Or several, but let's not make the perfect enemy of the good.) Paxfeline (talk) 11:39, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Assagioli's own version was included in an earlier version of the article: and it could be returned to the article. 96.224.196.217 (talk) 17:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Egg Diagram problem

message: I have moved this section (copied below) to the talk page because it needs rewriting to make it suitable for Wikipedia. Some further explanation of specific Psychosynthesis techniques might also by justified. Malcolm Schosha (talk) 19:08, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Methods of Psychosynthesis

message: there is no reaction, culturaly, about Psychosythetics? How does the world take this? Is it certafiable lunacy? Or is it respected? I'd like to know, as of now, from what little research I've done, not many people notice it, or care about it. Not only that but it seems new age and just another occult or mystical take on Jungian anaylisis?Sanitycult (talk) 03:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reaction 

message: I don't think that the analogies section is talking about the same psychosynthesis that this article is about. What do you think? Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 11:53, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analogies section? 

message: In my opinion the article is still a mess.  Compare it for example to http://two.not2.org/psychosynthesis/   On that sit I found what I was looking for.  Now I can interpret the "dog's dinner" that at the moment this article here is.
For instance, the opening paragraph contains a number of unrelated sentences some of which do not make grammatical sense.  It should provide a quick summary, an overview of what psychosynthesis is but it fails almost entirely to do that.  The content of the article doesn't seem to me to be the main problem, but that it needs to be better structured.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LookingGlass (talk • contribs) 09:19, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still a mess? 

message: Substituted at 03:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Psychosynthesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/69WMBskaT?url=http://www.psykosyntese.dk/a-146/ to http://www.psykosyntese.dk/a-146/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: After reading the lead, I still have no idea what psychosynthesis is supposed to be, other than that it is an approach to psychology that is different from other approaches. But I'm not even sure of that. Is it really an approach to psychology? Isn't it, rather, an approach to psychotherapy? After all, the primary aim of psychology is to develop an understanding of the functioning of the mind, which is very different from the stated aim of psychosynthesis of improving that functioning by eliminating conflicts and stimulating immature functions.  --Lambiam 17:04, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead has issues