Talk:Hacking Democracy

message: During the Hursti Hack:
The ballots all say "use only a #2 pencil." But everyone uses a black marker (i.e., not a #2 pencil). Not sure why. . .  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.216.10.118 (talk) 17:54, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Concerning the YouTube video, may I see a statement released by the producers and signed, should be notarized as well, that releases their movie for showing/distribution via YouTube? I hope this whole thing isnt on the basis that the uploader named themselves after the company, cause that would be silly, since when you sign up to YouTube you can name yourself whatever you want. 
This statement should be signed by HBO as well since its their logo being displayed and the exact version they aired, so unless HBO also consented to their logo being used by the producers we are still on legal shaky ground. --NuclearZer0 21:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You want a *what* ? -Kevinmooney 23:59, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I want to see the statement they released when the put the movie on YouTube, you know proof they did it. --NuclearZer0 00:19, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's up to you to prove that it's NOT the account of Public Interest Pictures on YouTube and Google Video. This country works on a presumption of innocence. - F.A.A.F.A. 08:13, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah sure, take it to AN/I if you have a problem. See what an admin says. --NuclearZer0 11:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External link

message: FROM the HBO HD page:
"HACKING DEMOCRACY was directed by Simon Ardizzone and Russell Michaels; produced by Simon Ardizzone, Robert Carrillo Cohen and Russell Michaels; executive producers, Earl Katz, Sarah Teale and Sian Edwards; edited by Sasha Zik. For HBO: supervising producer, John Hoffman; executive producer, Sheila Nevins. " Credits - F.A.A.F.A. 09:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as it doesn't say HBO produced it I do not care. --NuclearZer0 11:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producers 

message: Another facade of our wonderful government exposed.  This is right up there with our Income tax structure, Pharmaceutical drugs and more.  Great Job!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.108.26.79 (talk • contribs) 
:It didn't help 'em tonight! LOL! - F.A.A.F.A. - Hello Speaker Pelosi! 07:24, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fantastic Job

message: The number of reviews in the article is far too many. There is no point to keep every single insignificant review, especially from small irrelevant newspapers. I'd say a max of 10 review links should be more than enough dr.alf 08:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, some people don't get it however.--NuclearZer0 11:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removal without having some sort of inclusion of them in talk is poor practice.  You could save someone not aware of article history the effort of having to find all those items again with a simple link.  The revision with reviews is here.  They should not be used as is, but as a basis for a properly formatted section with input from major sources.  *Spark* 12:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Sounds like a good example of wp:point in action.  The afd is over and the result was snow keep.    Its proably not productive to an edit war to make a moot point.  I suppose having a having pages of reviews does help fill the sparse content on this article though.  Take a look at the numerous other movies such as Office_Space for ideas on how to reference reviews, without converting wiki to imdb.com Dman727 20:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews

message: There are numerous parties who would like to see this documentary 'disappeared', please lock page, the documentary questions the legitimacy of the 2000, 2004 and upcoming 2008 Federal Elections.
--220.239.179.128 (talk) 08:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have this page watchlisted.  I've seen no evidence that anyone is trying to "disappear" it.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommendation: This article must be locked immediately 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Hacking Democracy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110615130036/http://www.tvguide.com/news/bj-novak-office-36067.aspx to http://www.tvguide.com/News-Views/Interviews-Features/Article/default.aspx?posting=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:13, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hacking Democracy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110106075130/http://itpolicy.princeton.edu/voting/ to http://itpolicy.princeton.edu/voting/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Hacking Democracy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150220155142/http://www.emmyonline.org/mediacenter/news_28th_nominees_data_list.html to http://www.emmyonline.org/mediacenter/news_28th_nominees_data_list.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061116130343/http://smallscreen.monstersandcritics.com/article_1218135.php/HBO_defends_%60Hacking%60_from_criticism to http://smallscreen.monstersandcritics.com/article_1218135.php/HBO_defends_%60Hacking%60_from_criticism
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070817162111/http://www.dailycal.org/sharticle.php?id=14688 to http://www.dailycal.org/sharticle.php?id=14688
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061129070421/http://daily.stanford.org/article/2004/5/7/profHelpsGetVotingMachinesInStateDecertified to http://daily.stanford.org/article/2004/5/7/profHelpsGetVotingMachinesInStateDecertified
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hacking Democracy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161202140146/https://www.supportthevoter.gov/files/2013/09/VSTAAB-Security-Analysis-of-Diebold-AccuBasic-Interpreter-2006.pdf to https://www.supportthevoter.gov/files/2013/09/VSTAAB-Security-Analysis-of-Diebold-AccuBasic-Interpreter-2006.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:53, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified