lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ulf Ekman

message: The article is still a stub, and it is motivated: it mixes the controversies with what Ulf Ekman labored for (BTW, his official home page honestly admit the controversies). The controversies should be in a separate section, otherwise they obscure the central work and teachings of Ekman. NPOV is the goal, whatever I may think about it. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 08:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructure article 

message: You should check that out, because it says 2002 in this article while the year 2000 is mentioned in the article about the church Livets Ord.
:I've checked that out but not gotten a clear picture from the sources. All sources I found said that he is still in full power, but maybe he have created an international pastorship, and left the Swedish to some under him. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 15:43, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 2002 it was. Said: Rursus ☺ ★ 16:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passed on pastorship 2000 or 2002? 

message: The article refers to the lutheran church of Sweden. If this is supposed to be a label rather than an attempt to translate Svenska Kyrkan it should still point to the Svenska Kyrkan article Church of Sweden. This is what Svenska Kyrkan calls themselves at their web site, and that is the church he joined (and later left (or whatever it is called, I'm not a native English writer)). 
ElofTurtle (talk) 22:58, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church of Sweden 

message: The section on Theology needs to be rewritten keeping in mind his change to Catholicism in 2014.  That event changes the meaning of his being "ecumenical", or publishing a Protestant journal, etc. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 21:20, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  coherence and historical flow
Talk:Little Bear (TV series)

message: @Geraldo Perez Unfortunately the same vandalism keeps taking place in the recurring characters section, i’m wondering if we could get that I.P blocked or if we should go the semi-protected route? Hope to get your thoughts my friend  Elvisisalive95 (talk) 19:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It is protected for a week now. Can ask for longer if the vandalism recurs after the protect expires. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello @Geraldo Perez, the vandalism occured once again. (See Here - Diff) Hoping we can get the protection reinstated.  Elvisisalive95 (talk) 01:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Place to request protection is at WP:RPP. IP was previously blocked, I reported the IP. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:33, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism in Recurring Characters  

message: I tried removing the duplicate Episodes section in this article to favor the first one since it links to the standalone article that lists all of the Little Bear episodes. I’m having trouble removing the chart on this article. Could you help @Geraldo Perez? Elvisisalive95 (talk) 15:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @FlightTime I see you’re active, if you’re able perhaps you could be of assistance? I’m having trouble on this one. Elvisisalive95 (talk) 15:40, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @FlightTime & @Geraldo Perez Update: It was fixed thanks to @Whpq for reverting the edits done by @Speech Language Specialists Inc. Thank you all  Elvisisalive95 (talk) 15:57, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate Episodes Section
Talk:Abasiophilia

message: if Abasiophilia involves sexual things how is both my and my friends sites (The Wheelchair Zone and Transabled.org) related to the topic.  We do appreciate the extra traffic it would generate and I'm just wondering how our sites contribute in a sexual way to using wheelchairs etc. -- signed by an ANON IP 
: <<<As the combination of sex and disability are still considered taboo in most societies>>>
The deleted edit can be restored and rephrased like this:  
... but in western society, there's no social opposition to have a normal sexual relationship with people with a disability. Unless a non-mutual sexual attraction of one to another over their wheelchair-bound appearance, that will be treated as sexually deviant, or Abasiophilia.>>> 207.200.116.9 18:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Not a bad idea as long as that article adaquately covers this aspect. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.27.210.197 (talk) 18:28, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Attraction to Disability
Talk:Tillage

message: The translation to spanish of tillage is "labrar" the link to that page in spanish (http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labrar) is missing here. Camiloalcantara 10:50, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Going by the Intensive gathering page, I'd say that intensive gathering means giving some limited care to some wild plants. AlbertCahalan 04:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the page again, I see  "cultivation [...] additionally requires systematic soil preparation and planting", so it's not exactly the same thing, as you point out.  Still, I think that that the page is so stubby that perhaps it deserves to be merged?  Ben Aveling 11:20, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Cultivation should definitely be a separate article, if anything tillage should be part of cultivation, not the other way around.Shinzon se 07:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

text: agreed SoilMan2007 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 03:58, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Flagging as dubious. I am highly skeptical of the claim that tillage-derived windborne sediment is a component of the "natural" marine carbon sink. Please provide references or i will strike it from the article. SReynhout (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Environmental impacts

message: ( Zone Tillage -> Tillage )
My bad, forgot to start a discussion.
I don't know why, but feels fairly obvious... any reason why this SHOULDN'T happen? θvξrmagξ spellbook 02:16, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: this article seems to describe both as tilling just the planting row, so the difference is unclear. The strip-till article does not even mention "zone tillage". So how do these techniques differ? 76.119.30.87 (talk) 20:19, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  difference between strip-till and zone tillage? 

message: Reason:
# "Site preparation of forest land" and "Tillage" are different things actually.
# "Site preparation of forest land" part is too heavy that is taking the lead of this article.
-- Ma3r (talk) 13:59, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Ma3r: I think this section needs to be cleaned up. Also, the heading sounds grammatically wrong to me. "Forest land site preparation" is one possible replacement, but I'm not sure about that either. I'll post on the forestry wikiproject for more input. Regards, DesertPipeline (talk) 09:02, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest to Split the "Site preparation of forest land" part 

message: examples of secondary tillage 165.73.133.97 (talk) 18:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: examples of secondary tillage 165.73.133.97 (talk) 18:28, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agriculture 

message: Five(5) agricultural tilling tools 102.88.70.185 (talk) 20:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agricultural science
Talk:Darlene Zschech

message: I found that Zschech was actually born in Brisbane, not Sydney, from /Pages/Default.asp?pid=21 at DarleneZschech.com.  The Infobox is still technically incomplete, as no source readable in the United States has a maiden name for the Birth_name entry.  Otherwise the data appears correct. - B.C.Schmerker 07:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography data correction 

message: a german surname, isn´t it??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.168.233.225 (talk) 11:04, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  surname 

message: What is this meant to mean: "  .. as being two of several former directors of Mercy Ministries Australia likley for the organisation's "false, misleading and deceptive conduct"  "    likley?  Circumspects (talk) 02:24, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Little Typo

message: There's only one source, so this falls short of WP:GNG, WP:BIO. Please can you justify removing the notability tag from this WP:BLP. I shall reinstate the tag until so, as per the high standard required for BLPs. Widefox; talk 23:55, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources and notability
Talk:Hew Raymond Griffiths

message: I cut out the portion on the bottom stating that he had been extradited on 17 Feb. because there was no citation. I realize that "P2PFreak" may not be the most reputable of sources, but I feel that a semi-respectable source is better than none at all.TomTwerk 19:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extradition 

message: I have just deleted two polemical anti-US-Australia FTA references from this article, primarily because they were not cited in the article.
Furthermore, I want to raise as a discussion point that as much of the Williams case occurred prior to the enactment of the Aus-US FTA, I think it is inappropriate that it be cited as the reason for his detention. I think there may be quite valid legal objections to why he was detained, but clearly the Aus-US FTA is not one of them, given that it was not in effect at the time!
The statements referring to the Aus-US FTA are therefore wrong, and I shall be editting them within a week if there is not contravening discussion.
Meson81 09:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free Trade Agreement 
Talk:Pearl Brewing Company

message: I have tagged a couple of sections that need citing. I intend coming back later and finding the cites needed. And also expanding the lead a bit to meet requirements of WP:Lead. SilkTork *YES! 20:10, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagging

message: I personally doubt, that Pearl Beer, brewed wherever, is actually still available. However, this is better better examined by konnoissers of American "beer". Cheers, Oalexander (talk) 08:03, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Oalexander, if you're still interested, Pearl brands are owned by the Pabst Brewing Company, who no longer own a brewery, but who own the licences of several old American brands, such as Pearl. All brands owned by Pabst, including Pearl, are currently brewed by MillerCoors. But in 2021 they will be brewed by City Brewing Company for 20 years. After that, I don't know where (if anywhere) they will be brewed. SilkTork (talk) 18:24, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you SilkTork, your reply is much appreciated. Thank you! Oalexander (talk) 02:34, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability of Pearl Beer 

message: These images were removed from the article in 2008, and placed in a gallery subpage (Talk:Pearl Brewing Company/Images). That subpage is now being listed for deletion (Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/Talk:Pearl_Brewing_Company/Images) . If anyone feels any of these images should be in the article, or if the entire gallery should be in the article, please take a look and make some action soon. SilkTork (talk) 18:13, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Why doesn't this article offer more information about Otto Koehler? Is it because of the scandal surrounding his death? Jruizalvarez (talk) 19:40, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Otto Koehler
Talk:Kenneth II of Scotland

message: Probably not suitable for inclusion in the article itself, but Kenneth II (and Finnguala) made appearances as characters in the episode "Avalon Part One" of Disney's Gargoyles cartoon series. —Matthew0028 12:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cartoon appearance

message: A discussion about renaming this article, and others, is ongoing at Wikipedia:WikiProject Medieval Scotland/Royal naming. --Elonka 01:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change
Category talk:Anti-corporate activism

message: If 'Fugazi' gets an entry on this page, then what about 'Rage Against the Machine' or 'Chumbawamba'?
Maybe the whole 'Subversive Artists' list needs to be considered?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Subversive_artists
(And maybe that needs to be revised and expanded, for that matter. Neither Fugazi nor Rage Against the machine are in the list!) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.31.90.45 (talk) 02:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Activist Artists
Talk:Hobgoblins (film)

message: Perhaps the movie's MST3K showing should be sorted elsewhere other than the first paragraph of this article. Calmsavior 02:10, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: MST3K reference within intro
Talk:Emo kids

message: The article as written comes across as derogatory (not to mention it probably needs to be expanded).--Caliga10 12:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not to mention that it also appears to be nonsense. -- The Anome 12:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Touche, but it is probably worthy of an article nonetheless, since it's a modern youth subculture.--Caliga10 12:42, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, the whole subculture thing is referenced in the main 'Emo' article.  Agree on deletion.--Caliga10 12:44, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Delete borderline between WP:BJAODN and WP:PN --horsedreamer 16:56, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Deletion marker re-added.--Caliga10 17:16, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Sounds good.--Caliga10 18:40, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:FHM-U.S.'s 100 Sexiest Women 2006

message: Why is this list marked as an AFD? The link in the AFD is to the (closed) 1995 list, and there is no link to a 2006 one. The result was to keep, and I don't think it will change based on the year. I didn't want to remove the AFD after seeing how new it was, but perhaps it should be? Iorek85 12:42, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD
Talk:Jason Zimbler

message: In 2006 - 2007 Jason Zimbler played the character "Chad" in the first 3 episodes of the web-show "Who's the Pope?" on http://www.thebigthings.com/ . Should this be added to the wiki article? 64.243.0.177 16:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That URL is 404'd, and I can't find any reliable sources to corroborate that information.  If you have some, please feel free to add them to the article (or list them here and somebody else will).  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 00:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continued Acting Work 

message: As a WP:BLP, I culled the article of all unverified information.  I struck everything unreferenced and rebuilt it with 100% referencing.  The prior version is here for anybody interested in going back to try and reference any of the information that had been there.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 16:40, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  reconstitution 

message: * http://www.oregonlive.com/performance/index.ssf/2010/01/portland_theater_company_the_r.html  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 20:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources 

message: he is jewish  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:191:5FA0:F00B:72D5:32C7:D8B6 (talk) 09:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  jewish
Talk:Fetish clothing

message: I've removed the following from the article to here, in the absence of any verifiable references:
:Another manifestation of clothing fetishes would include suit and tie fetish.  This particular fetish typicaly is a combination of stimulation to the senses of sight and touch; persons with this fetish not only appreciate the sharp, dapper  and powerful look of a man dressed formally for business but also are stimulated  by the feel of soft wool, crisp cotton and sleek silk.  This fetish can apply both to the man wearing the suit and to the person viewing the man in the suit and tie.  There is also a great deal of crossover with fetish footwear, particularily with formal leather business shoes and with over-the-calf formal business socks.
-- The Anome 12:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

message: *disagree, do not merge. Chris 21:40, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge-tagging of Glove fetishism

message: Barring any objections grounded in policy I'm going to be redirecting this in the near future to the "Garment fetishes" article that I am creating to bring all of the garment fetish stubs and unsourced original research articles under one roof where they can be more easily sourced. If anyone has any questions you can hit me up here or on my talk page. NeoFreak 17:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: These really should be merged. --Kukini  hablame aqui 22:48, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Being Bold
Talk:Star Bonifacio Echeverria

message: I am glad that the owner of the source of the material here is available, as I have a query regarding the history. It states that the elder relative was a gunmaker in the 18th Century, yet his sons entered the business in 1905 (20th Century). Since all other information suggest the sons dates are correct (World War I) I assume that the father was active in the 19th Century - although flintlocks were largely superceeded by percussion models by the middle of that century.
Also, please sign your comments by typing four tildes (~) at the end. Thank you.LessHeard vanU 22:26, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fathers and sons 

message: I've just added this tag. Although the first half doesn't need more than a bit of touching up, the second half (starting from sub-machine guns) contains some odd wordings, presumably caused by incorrect translation from the spanish wiki-article. -- MiG (talk) 10:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I suggest that Star Firestar M45, to the extent sourcing can be provided, be merged here, as there is little written on the gun itself.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I have a sun curtain industry gun I want to renew 2A02:CB80:4108:1B02:3059:B62D:FEDD:1689 (talk) 20:04, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a sun curtain industry gun I want to renew
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Redirects/Texas/Farm to Market and Ranch to Market Roads

message: I wrote a script to validate this list by checking TxDOT. Because I don't expect to continue maintaing this page, here is the perl script if anyone wants to re-check in the future.--Svgalbertian (talk) 17:58, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Script
Talk:Jennifer James

message: who's = who is.  "...whose name", not "who's name".
"Jennifer known as Jenny's father" - It would be very strange if Jennifer was known as Jenny's father, which is what this phrase indicates.
In a number of places, commas have been used where full stops are needed. In one place the wording and punctuation suggests that she got married after she found out she had been written out of the script. This is suggested by the reference to the marriage being followed by a comma followed by the word "after". The dates, however, suggest that in fact the wedding was first, then the news of the writing out. Presumably what happened after the news was not the wedding, but the production of the video. If this is incorrect, it will need to be changed back. Get someone good at grammar to help you with this.
Every birth is a drama. Details of the rush to the hospital aren't necessary in an encyclopaedia article. Difficult births are worth noting, though.—Copey 2 13:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who is she, and what does she do?  By reading the opening paragraph of this article, I should be able to ascertain this information; instead it reads like a story of comeone I'm already supposed to be aware of.  Needs reworking to explain notability under WP:BIO.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 17:22, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tl|cleanup}} 
Talk:Clinical engineering

message: I'm no Clinical Engineer. Reading through the article, it's hard to understand what is written, especially in the first paragraphs. I don't feel qualified to summarize this jargon accurately, but I would love to see someone else do so. Thanks friends <3 PocketsForBirds (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Technical-terminology dense

message: I have moved this article from Clinical Engineering to clinical engineering because I think these kinds of articles shouldn't be capitalized, see for example software engineering and genetic engineering. Fetofs Hello! 13:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: CEs do work in similar settings as BMETs, but their roles are typically quite different...with the former being recognized by the major relevant professional organizations as an established branch of Biomedical Engineering. Technicians do perform valuable work and I would not comment on whose is more or less "important," but it is nonetheless distinguished from that of engineers. Of course, as with many branches of engineering, sometimes in practice they can spend portions of their time doing "technician" type work, and conversely, sometimes technicians contribute to design or analysis in ways that could be deemed engineering. Biolawyer (talk) 16:11, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: I
Talk:Gastric-brooding frog

message: If you would like to see my reasoning behind changing the taxonomy for this "family", see User:LiquidGhoul/Ground-dwelling frog taxonomy (haven't created it yet, check back soon). The change is for many species, and if you would like to discuss it I would rather keep it in the one place. Thanks. --liquidGhoul 13:06, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomy Change

message: Why are they doubling up? -- Froggydarb croak 23:52, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it fixed now? Gimmetrow 01:40, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cited Refs 

message: See this. --78.0.233.131 (talk) 07:04, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's back! 

message: "... it is not clear whether the eggs were laid on the land or in the water, as it was never observed before their extinction" 
"Most female frogs had around 40 ripe eggs, alsmot double that of the number of juveniles ever found in the stomach. This means one of two things, that the female fails to swallow all the eggs or the first few eggs to be swallowed are digested."
If the egg-laying has never been observed, and only half the number of juveniles are found, how is it known that they lay "around 40 ripe eggs"? At what point were these eggs counted, and where were they at the time?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.153.24.26 (talk) 10:04, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Reproduction 

message: Where is link on science articles in section about biology and reproduction. I would like read it. --OJJ (talk) 14:12, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , of the two sources in the "Reproduction" section, the first is an Australian government report, freely available at . The other is a book, and we don't have a link for that. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:22, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref 

message: This frog is in the extinct category, which I though was interesting. It’s from Australia and went extinct in the 1980s due to human introduction of pathogenic fungi into their environment. What’s really interesting is that at the end of the page, there is a short section that explains that scientists are trying to bring the species back by using non-living tissue samples. I found this really exciting. Some strengths of this entry are that even though the frog species has gone extinct, there is still a pretty large collection of citations and resources. The reproduction section was also a strength of this entry—there is a lot of well-cited information on parental care. Three general categories that this page is missing are diet, defenses and predators. These three categories would provide a lot of insight into where these frogs place in the circle of life. Finally, the talk page of this article has not that many posts BUT it has a comment about new research that actually did manage to reproduce the frogs and bring them back from extinction. I think this is very exciting and I would love to read more about it.
Eylul.horozoglu (talk) 20:51, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Assignment Frog #2