lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eye cancer

message: Cancer can develop in the eyes.  When asking "What is eye cancer, and how does it develop," it is important to know that the eyeball, also referred to as the globe, has two important parts that are able to become infected with cancerous diseases.  The important parts of the eye that can form cancer are the retina and the uvea.  When cancer is forms in these parts of the eye, it is reffered to as Intraocular Cancer, meaning within the eye, and when cancer spreads to other parts of the body it is known as secondary intraocular cancer. To better understand what eye cancer is and how to treat it, some background information is necessary. The orbit and and Adnexal structures of the eye may become infected with cancer.  The orbit is tissue around the eyeball.  When this tissue becomes infected it is called Orbital Cancer.  The Adnexal (or accessory) structure, such as the eyelid or tear glands, becomes infected it is called Adnexal Cancer. Types of Cancer to agknowledge or become familiar with are cancers such as primary intraocular cancers and secondary intraocular cancers.  Primary intraocular cancers start in side the globe, or eyeball.  For adults, the two most common primary intraocular cancers are melanoma and lymphoma. For children, retinoblastoma is the most common primary intraocular cancer with medulloepithelioma coming in second. Secondary intraocular cancers are cancers that have spread to the eye from another part of the body. The most common cancers that spread to the eye are breast and lung cancers. This occurs quite often when these diseases spread. Usually these cancers spread to the part of the eyeball called the uvea. Surgery is available to treat and cure primary intraocular melanomas but not lymphoma.  Some of the surgeries include removing the iris, removal of the ciliary bodies that become infected or even removal of the entire eyeball.  Generally, patients are free to leave the hospital one or two days after surgery, but severe cases do call for long recovery times.
----
The above information was moved here from Eye. -AED 21:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Eye
Talk:Dokimasia

message: I think the cleanup tag is unnecessary. I will remove it soon, if no one has any objections. --Mashford 21:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems clean 

message: I replaced a 'q.v.' notation with a link to the relevant article, and corrected capitalisation and spelling of 'Ephebi' (which is neither English nor Greek) to Greek 'epheboi'.
Agemegos 07:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "q.v."
Talk:Magmortar

message: Why would its name be based off of a bird if it doesn't seem to have any bird-like characteristics?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by M C Y 1008 (talk • contribs).
:Guess I forgot to sign this. Eh, someone took it out already anyway.—M_C_Y_1008 (talk/contribs) 00:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's back in.  Guess somebody should tell them that Magmar is called Boober in Japanese.  I'll see if I can fix this. -Jeske (v^_^v) 04:40, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's based off Boo, as in, the classic ghost noise. 66.63.86.156 23:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it would have to be based off of Magmar's Japanese name.  btw, why are you posting to a three-and-a-half-month-old conversation? -Jeske (v^_^v) 00:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Booby? 

message: Just...awful, grammar-wise. Please get this cleaned up. Cipher (Yell) 20:05, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Videogame section 

message: Can you please change the name of the article to Magmortar? From User:Wolf Link 555
:Dude, why do you think this article is protected from moving? Because we need a GOOD source. TheBlazikenMaster 17:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, we need a source that complies with the English-language Wikipedia's guideline for reliable sources. Serebii doesn't, as his information is attributed to an anonymous source. – mcy1008 (talk) 20:58, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe so, but Serebii.net has sometimes done mistakes, that's why it isn't relable enough. Besides now the name has been confirmed. TheBlazikenMaster 13:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  English name 

message: In the article, it says that you have a 5% chance of catching a magby holding a magmarizer. However, I thought that if you have diamond, the chance of getting a magmarizer is boosted to 50%? KjtheDj 00:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Information?
Talk:Hour of the Gun

message: The title of the Star Trek 1968 TV episode "Spectre of the Gun" is probably a reference to this film. This is probably too trivial for inclusion in either article, though. — Loadmaster (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Star Trek

message: Erp was not a "city marshal" there is no such a thing as a city marshal. He was a Territorial Marshal. 2603:8081:8900:8D64:9DB4:FE97:ABF6:D115 (talk) 02:35, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error
Talk:Zara Bate

message: Firstly, I've reduced its size and lowered its position, as it was dominating the picture of Zara herself.  
But secondly, do we really need it at all?  Before we had a pic of Zara, I guess it was better than nothing.  But now that that's been rectified ....  I can't see it serves any real purpose.  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  08:57, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it doesn't serve any purpose whatsoever. I have no objections with it being removed from the article (And deleted from Commons)with the lower picture taking its place. Wikistar (Place order here) 10:26, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, now we have a 2nd pic, the doll's house goes.  NFA.  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  10:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Doll's house picture
Talk:Robert L. Ghormley

message: I added information on Ghormley's selection as COMSOPAC, which was decided upon in April 1942, with Ghormley taking the command in mid-May, and I moved up the paragraph on his selection over Admiral Pye. Along with that, I added short notes on the Battle of the Coral Sea and Japanese moves in the Solomons, which took place in early May.  I moved information on Operation Watchtower to after Ghormley's assignment, as that operation was not ordered until July. I added a summary of the forces assigned to Ghormley for Watchtower.  I deleted the passage about the Battle of Midway as it did not seem relevant to Ghormley. 
 Sean Barnett (talk) 04:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assignment as COMSOPAC
Talk:A Big Hand for the Little Lady

message: This is not Card Player magazine. The anonymous editor who keeps putting his/her commentary back in should consider several objections:
*Unless you are a published writer, your opinion on the improbability of the rules constitutes WP:POV.
*This is a special, once-a-year, semi-private game. They can use whatever rules they want.
*The rules as they exist today do not mean they were set in stone from the beginning of time. You need to cite a reference about the rules at that time before you can even begin to address the previous issues.
See The Cincinnati Kid#Notes on the play for how to comment in an encyclopedic manner.
Clarityfiend (talk) 21:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poker commentary 

message: Similar story. Season 3, episode 34 (May 3, 1958) is called "The Big Con" where a group of men stage a high stakes card game in Dodge City's Long Branch saloon. One goes to the town banker and asks for $20,000 loan with a card hand of four aces and a ten, saying he needs the money "to call" and that he cannot lose. The banker hands over the money and the man loses to a 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of hearts. The loser promises to pay the $20,000 soon but Marshall Dillon suspects it is a con game, as it is, and he tricks the gang into running, so he can catch them.(5.8.190.86 (talk) 18:48, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Gunsmoke
Talk:Franklin Gardner

message: I attended Mass today at St. John the Evangelist Cathedral in Lafayette, La.  Afterwards, I walked through the cemetery behind it and saw the grave of Franklin Gardner and noted the history on his burial sight. I looked up this individual on your web sight and it is noted that he is buried at an Episcopal church cemetery when it is a Catholic cemetery. I also saw the graves of the Mouton family as well.
----Karen Miles  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.79.16.167 (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial sight 

message: The request for additional citations includes a reference to blp, clearly in error. I don't know how to delete this part of the tag. Valetude (talk) 12:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong tag
Talk:Huntleys Point, New South Wales

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.visitsydneyaustralia.com.au/gladesville.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  echidnaLives - talk - edits 01:18, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Apologies, forgot to add revisions.
Requires revdel from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Huntleys_Point,_New_South_Wales&oldid=145844223 to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Huntleys_Point,_New_South_Wales&oldid=1094892017. Thanks, echidnaLives - talk - edits 01:54, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revdel
Talk:Carausian revolt

message: This was added by an editor who has made a possible hoax or otherwise problematic edit to another niche history page. Would be good to review. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:00, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspicious edit 
Talk:Crystal Lake South High School

message: Per our policy on biographies of living persons, potentially defamatory claims about living persons require a verifiable source from some reliable publication even when appearing on talk pages.  Until you can provide proof of outside publication for these claims (and I don't mean speculation on web forums), you should not be making them.  Even if you happen to have private knowledge that these claims are true, it doesn't matter unless you can also show that they have been established in prior publications.  This is because Wikipedia must apply caution and protect individuals against potential defamation and invasion of privacy associated with unverified claims.  Dragons flight 09:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:BLP]]

message: Again I've had to make a few changes to this page. First of all, yet again, source Ms. Stone's attendance or it keeps getting removed. Unfortunately, the same goes for Colleen Dion. As for LCPL Collins, I appreciate the effort, but in all honesty, he is not notable, and therefore is not "famous" under the alumni section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cougar Draven (talk • contribs) 21:22, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Once again
Talk:Hard hat

message: Helmet light mount is one paragraph, unreferenced, and with very little content.  It could be merged as a 1-liner addition to this article. --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:00, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest merge

message: essentially the exact same thing User:SmartyPantsKid 21:08, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Mining helmet]] 

message: The bowler hat can be suppose as a precursor to the hard hat in it's original intent as a gamekeeper's protective headwear https://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-events/the-history-of-the-bowler-hat and with the apparent additions of Secrete_(helmet) type, sewn into the interior during the hat's use in the working classes of Britain. I am currently researching this for sources, validity, and academic acceptance. I am completely open to opinions and the possibility this belongs as a minor edit or as an entry on another page, which may not currently be linked to this one. Another extant possibility is the expansion into general early forms of workplace head protection. Patron Vectras (talk) 15:12, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose Major Addition
Talk:John Thach

message: The source Arkansas Biographies (relevant page available for view here  gives Thach's date of birth as April 11, 1906, not the date given in the article.  I'm hesitant to "correct" the date, as I suspect the original authors of the article likely had better sources than this omnibus of famous Arkansans.  Could someone with access to such sources please confirm?
--JohnPomeranz (talk) 18:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say that your source is better than an uncited DOB and the article should be changed!.E2a2j (talk) 17:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the confidence, but sometimes Be Bold isn't the right way to go.  I've had a chance to look at the other online sources, including the official U.S. Navy page that I just added as a general reference for many of the facts (and, indeed, the apparent source of some of the text of the article), and it appears that the Arkansas Biographies date of birth is the outlier.  All other sources use the 1905 date, so we'll leave it be.  JohnPomeranz (talk) 16:36, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth? 

message: With how many aerial victories was he credited?--109.91.74.243 (talk) 23:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aereal victories?
Talk:William F. Bringle

message: Hi There!
I'm new at this. So I don't know how to log the changes I've made to pages nor how to add a public domain photo in my possession to a page that needs one.
So far I have edited the pages for:
Admiral Roy L. Johnson (I have an Official US Navy Photo of him)
Admiral Bernard A. Clarey 
Admiral Eugene B. Fluckey
Admiral William F. Bringle
All of the information I added to these pages are from Official Biographies that were produced by the Public Affairs Office of the Commander in Chief US Pacific Fleet. The information is accurate and in the public domain.
USN Historian 01:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing I've Done
Talk:Wood bison

message: From the little bit of research that I've done, there doesn't seem to be a consensus, yet, on whether the Wood Bison is a subspecies or ecotype of the North American Bison. So I added some references that discuss the controversy. But it would be nice if someone created a section for discussing the controversy and enumerating the arguments for both sides of the debate. Ninjatacoshell (talk) 18:15, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indented line
I think there is a consensus on wood bison and plains bison being separate subspecies. In my recent comprehensive lit review and correspondence with CWS, NWT and AB biologists I didn't encounter any controversy, and ended up not having any reason to bring up the ecotype idea at all. Evidence of distinction in genetics, range, autecology and morphology is pretty good, and the ecotype idea papers you cited are based on a couple papers both published over 20 years ago. I'd like to update and flesh out this article in stages when timing is appropriate... I think it's important to get all the facts out into the public domain. Bison are as much part of the natural heritage of Canada as the beaver is. Librarywild (talk) 08:34, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Subspecies/Ecotype Controversy

message: The purpose of the outherd was to establish a "safety stock", not related to other species.
چیمن حیدری بهنودسیاه بخت (talk) 19:13, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outherd 

message: I realize this is a contested subject, however I believe the presence of the shaggier head, thicker (not point) beard, foreleg chaps, and more rounded hump indicate that the animal shown is a plains bison vs. wood bison.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reeltraveler (talk • contribs) 15:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture featured at the top right; isn't that a plains bison? 

message: The article clearly states this is still a threatened species, yet it is listed as non-threatened. Please correct this. 
* I changed the status to VU, vulnerable, because I can't find what level of threatened the wood bison is at. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:4605:200:11C7:6E8F:4D89:F793 (talk) 03:37, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article clearly states this is still a threatened species 

message: " Conservation
The herd currently has a total population around 2,500, "
The article speaks of all Wood Bison, all herds, the subsection "Conservation" should not lead with "the herd", that makes no sense. Tallard (talk) 16:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservation section first sentence doesn't really make sense
Talk:Kuku Yalanji

message: The citation for this statement is an unsourced quote from a "Queensland environment minister", found is a news article from the guardian... The encyclopedic validity of that statement is, in my opinion, absolutely not supported by the citation. The article in general is written in a way that seems completely centered on the "white" misdeeds, rather than being informative. Added to that the typos ("patritic defence" war), it gives a quite poor impression of its quality. (Unsigned comment by 83.85.142.68, 25 January 2022)
:Thanks for your comment. That led me to notice some earlier editorialising that had been added to cited content, which I have now removed, and I also added more detail and another citation to the "oldest living cultures" bit. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "One of the oldest living cultures"?
Talk:Despero

message: For what it's worth here is what I remember about Despero's comparative power-levels from memory alone. No claims are made that it's spotless, or the analysis is flawless, but it might be helpful for other people's check-ups and additions:
Despero has simultaneously and almost effortlessly manhandled Superman, Wonder Woman, Power Girl and Captain Marvel in JLA/JSA: Virtue & Vice. He severely outclassed the Martian Manhunter+Power Girl in old Justice League Europe/International issues, and was apparently treated as stronger than all the present Justice League members in the recent Infinite Crisis tie-in, although he was here also shown as far easier to injure than Superman, given that Aquaman managed to do so using his harpoon. Dave 13:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gscshoyru asked me for input about JJonz reverts
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-10-02/In the news

message: I chose not to cover the  The End User: A wiki way to profit from the International Herald Tribune as it is mostly about Wikia not Wikipedia. It does however, mention the relative strength of the Polish Wikipedia given its high articles to speakers ratio and also the implementation of the flagging system on the German Wikipedia. --Trödel 22:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I was interviewed for the article in our local newspaper, The News,  The World According to Wiki that appeared this morning.  The article is an example of local press coverage about Wikipedia. It stresses the immediacy of the information. I am not sure if it is useful for ITN and I am also not sure of the process for the production of ITN, so I thought I would mention it here.  KenWalker | Talk 20:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local Media Report About Wikipedia 

message: In case anyone is interested in the details of this, as I was... I dusted off my German skills and wandered through their 'Cafe' and 'Community Portal' until I found a link to it at 'looked at versions'. There is apparently a 'two tiered' approach with the higher level being called 'closely examined versions'. From what I gather, a particular edit is classified as a 'looked at' version if any 'trusted user' (which is defined as 30 days + 30 edits on the German page, but 4 days in the news article) created it, updated it from what was previously a 'looked at' version, or specifically clicks a box to mark it as having been looked at... which is supposed to be done any time there is no vandalism in the article. The 'closely examined' version is going to be limited to some more select group and would indicate that all of the facts in the article are properly referenced. Logged in users apparently see the current version and it can be set up so that anons see either the 'looked at' or 'closely examined' version by default (or the current version if none are tagged) with buttons to view the other two types. The 'automatic updating' of the 'looked at' version makes a big difference, but I'd see potential problems with defaulting anons to the 'closely examined' version. Hopefully it will also not be possible to edit the 'tagged' versions to avoid confusion where people add information to the 'closely examined' copy which was already in the current page (and simultaneously remove other improvements) or click to edit the 'looked at' version and are taken to the current and find that the text they were going to change isn't there at all. Presumably in most cases they'd have to view the current version first and make changes to that, but I didn't see anything about it in the text. --CBD 13:07, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links and info on 'stable versions' 

message: Giving the Heave-Ho in an Online Who’s Who -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 21:39, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NYTimes piece about AfD
Talk:Tan Kim Seng

message: Quick question: is the donation sum of $13,000 in United States Dollars, Singapore dollars or Straits dollars? Is it adjusted for inflation or just accurate at the time? GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 22:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be in Straits dollars, accurate as at that time, which I believe was a huge amount. —Sengkang 00:55, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Donation
Talk:San Andrés, San Andrés y Providencia

message: The previous content of this article was almost entirely irrelevant, being appropriate to the article on the San Andrés y Providencia Department. E.g. history of the region, background of the Raizals, treaty with Nicaragua, tourism in the islands. Some was simply wrong: the population of the town cannot be 100,000 as there are only 60,000 people in the whole department.
Some of the deleted material seems useful, and I will incorporate it into the Department article.
--Rich Rostrom (Talk) 01:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article almost entirely OT.