lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aortic arch

message: I have tagged the claim "The lower curvature of the arch has a lower pressure than the upper curvature. This is where the ductus arteriosus is connected during the fetal stage" as dubious; per , ductus arteriosus connects to the descending aorta, not the arch. --Eleassar my talk 05:40, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: @ I am unsure about what we should write here. From my understanding the remnant of the duct the ligamentum arteriosum connects to the arch of aorta. In addition my Gray's Anatomy 40th edition states that the ductus arteriosus connects to the arch of aorta. On the other hand you have a source which states otherwise. I will as at the talk page of WikiProject Anatomy. Depending on the answer, or by providing a cleverly-phrased middle ground, we will change a few articles. --Tom (LT) (talk) 10:14, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Ductus arteriosus

message: For future editors: --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: During the course of dissecting a rat, we would like to include a section that compares the anatomical similarities and differences between the aortic arch of humans compared to rodents (specifically the rat). Here is a possible source that we would use to derive such information from, or follow as an example from our own dissection of the rat: Ciszek, B., Skubiszewska, D., and Ratajska, A. 2007. The anatomy of the cardiac veins in mice. Journal of Anatomy. 211:(1). 53-63. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2375793/
Dizzle32 (talk) 21:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Proposal
Talk:Another Side (John Barrowman album)

message: I linked the CD cover to this article and updated the image page for fair use here.
Kresock (talk) 22:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album image 
Talk:Hamoodur Rahman Commission

message: H Hamoo offic (talk) 07:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  h 
Talk:Basilar artery

message: Basilar is not a topic. It is a quality. It means "base", in the sense, from or related to the base, of something. arteries are not the main topic of being at the base of something, so I am redirecting it to the disambiguation page. ~ R.T.G 18:00, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi RTG, I think you have a good point, and in fact I think we should move the disambiguation page to the title "basilar". Dr. Vogel (talk) 20:31, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: User:DrVogel move done. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 23:47, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basilar redirects here, but it shouldn't
Talk:Celiac artery

message: Hey, don't really know the etiquette but cystic artery is normally (70% according to your own article) a branch of the right hepatic artery, ref Gray's Anatomy for Students and Moore and Daley's Clincal Anatomy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.126.85.77 (talk) 05:32, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cystic artery 

message: The Coeliac disease page gives the Greek etymology for the word, and as far as I can tell from other web references, the root is the same. I'm not sure how to work it into this page though. The fourth paragraph of the intro section for Coeliac disease states "The term coeliac derived from the Greek κοιλιακός (koiliakós, "abdominal") and was introduced in the 19th century in a translation of what is generally regarded as an ancient Greek description of the disease" 
Since I always find root etymologies to be helpful in understanding concepts, could someone find a way to work this into the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bush6984 (talk • contribs) 03:04, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:List of tallest buildings in St. Louis

message: Thanks to everybody who turned my sleepy little list into a worthy DYK!  In any event, the current footnote says the Arch is the 52nd tallest building in Missouri.  The reference does not point to anything that even remotely confirms that.  There are not that many television or other towers in Missouri that are taller and in fact the referenced http://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?searchID=45891574&offset=51 page does not even mention the KFVS TV Mast which at 1677 feet is the tallest tower in the state (and one of the world's tallest structures) (now that I look at those articles they have to be fixed also). Thanks again for your considerable efforts.00:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It took some figuring out but the list incredibly is correct!  That was quite eye opening for me!  You have to adjust the "offset"  Thanks again! Americasroof (talk) 01:52, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Gateway Arch 52nd tallest structure in Missouri?
Talk:Flensburg radar detector

message: Why it was the radar dector named Flensburg? Maybe somebody owns a quote/source to it. Thank you. --Soenke Rahn (talk) 01:22, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why it was the radar dector named Flensburg? 

message: "of 170–220 MHz, subharmonics"
I am unsure about the term subharmonic, I do not belief it is "proper".
My guess is that the Germans had a receiver for that frequency range and found it was sensitive enough to detect the Intermodulation at sufficient range. A signal bandwidth of 87% sounds "funny". --Moritzgedig (talk) 10:14, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subharmonic
Talk:Lorenz (navigation)

message: Should be combined with the other article Lorenz beam. DonPMitchell (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, it's a complete overlap. --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree ClemMcGann (talk) 19:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Lorenz beam

message: There are two articles on this system, the other being Lorenz (navigation). DonPMitchell (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged, and some references and links added. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:21, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: The Consol navigation system that was in use during and after the war is as far as I understand a version of this. I have added a few sentences about it and added redirects from consol_navigation_system and sonne_navigation_system since I could not find any separate articles about that. I'm no expert on this, but I have based it on this webpage: http://www.jproc.ca/hyperbolic/consol.html. But still someone who know something about it should probably write more about it. Hallvor (talk) 17:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consol/Sonne 
Talk:Synthetic vision system

message: This article seems to assume that synthetic vision systems are confined to aircraft, which is of course quite incorrect. It also treats enhanced vision systems as a subset of synthetic vision systems whereas in fact the reverse is the case. treesmill (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about non-aviation applications? 

message: An aviation specialist may be needed to 1) Reorganize the article so that the over-long lead is shortened and some of its content moved into the body of the article and 2)turn the (possibly dead) external links found in the lead and body into inline citations. In the case of dead links, you may want to search for those sources in the Internet Archive or elsewhere.--Quisqualis (talk) 19:24, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long lead, external links
Talk:The Assassination of the Duke of Guise

message: The photograph is actually from the L'Assassinat du duc de Guise of Lumière brothers (a much shorter film made in 1897) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5_GaMG5QqsLumiere), not from the Bargy's film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.28.28.193 (talk) 16:57, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:New Zealand Listener

message: This article about one of the founding editors M. H. Holcroft contains more details about his work at the Listener:
https://ojs.victoria.ac.nz/kotare/article/download/671/482/ 
 
The book SCOOPED: THE POLITICS AND POWER OF JOURNALISM IN AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND, chapter 12, by Finlay Macdonald: 
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.833.4615&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=201
Blueskinbay (talk) 00:56, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful sources to improve this page 

message: This would appear to be a fairly minor incident in the overall history of the magazine. Including it in this article would appear to be undue weight. If we had an article several screens in length, I suspect it still would not warrant this much coverage. I suggest we remove the paragraph and add a "See also" to the same paragraph in the Heartland Institute article.-gadfium 20:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cap'nTrade (talk) 20:22, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Heartland controversy

message: Hi: I found a wonderful resource in an old anniversary issue of the NZ Listener (July 1 1989): a page of previous editors, with dates. But the dates ended with Geoff Baylis. If anyone could supply the remaining missing dates...
Thanks! 
Tahatai (talk) 03:22, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The list of editors needs dates
Talk:Superior laryngeal artery

message: This article seems to be describing the same as the internal laryngeal artery in almost the same words.  If this is correct, they should be merged. --Snigbrook (talk) 19:41, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made the Internal laryngeal artery a redirect to Superior laryngeal artery, per : "The superior laryngeal artery running with the internal laryngeal nerve to become internal laryngeal artery and nerve (Clemente plate 454; Grant p. 770; Netter 3e 130, 4e 69)." --Eleassar my talk 14:39, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Internal laryngeal artery]] same article?
Talk:Blown flap

message: "The Airbus A380, because of its massive size, is one of the few major commercial airliners to use externally blown flaps, which continue behind its engines."
This statement just doesn't seem right, even though it is sourced. Massive size by itself doesn't require a powered lift system. I don't believe the more massive AN-225 has one.
There would be certification issues for large civil jet aircraft with powered lift (see NASA TN D-4261 on the Boeing 707 powered lift tests).
"one of the few" what are the others?
Flaps behind engines doesn't mean they are blown. eg A320/330/340 all have flaps behind engines.
But more importantly, for this deletion, A380 flap system info in these Airbus reports does not support the statement.
"Aerodynamic Design of Airbus High-Lift Wings in a Multidisciplinary Environment" by Reckzeh. Figure 10 shows pressure distribution with high-lift elements deployed very similar A340/380.
"Aerodynamic Design of Airbus High Lift Wings" by Reckzeh. Page 22 shows engine exhaust doesn't scrub wing lower surface. Also says if exhaust touched even just trailing edge of flap it would create challenges.Pieter1963 (talk) 23:56, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: A380 flaps

message: Can anyone cite this?  If not I will delete it because I've not found any source/patent in the course of doing the recent addition to "History" I think there may be BLC experiments using suction which it may refer to as opposed to blown flaps.Pieter1963 (talk) 00:18, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Blown flaps invented by the British"
Talk:Superior thyroid artery

message: Readily represented in a single article, with the benefit of context. Unlikely to be significantly expanded in the future -- is still based around Gray's Anatomy descriptions, which are almost 96 years old now. Per  on WT:ANAT, this article may also not be "notable" enough as an anatomical entity to have its own article. Therefore I propose a merge, if the subject is significantly expanded at some future date, this article could be resplit. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: -- I merged the articles; the proposal remained uncontested for almost a year. --Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 01:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Glandular branches of the superior thyroid artery]] 

message: Per above. Readily mergable. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: --Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 01:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Infrahyoid branch of superior thyroid artery]] 

message: Per above Tom (LT) (talk) 00:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: --Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 01:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Superior laryngeal artery]] 

message: Per above Tom (LT) (talk) 00:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: --Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 01:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Sternocleidomastoid branch of superior thyroid artery]] 

message: Per above Tom (LT) (talk) 00:17, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: --Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 01:46, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Cricothyroid branch of superior thyroid artery]]
Talk:Superior vesical artery

message: As stated, this artery (middle vesical) doesn't exist, and is regarded often as one of the offshoots of the superior vesical artery. It would be therefore better to cover them on the same page, under 'variations', as one is simply a variation of the other. LT910001 (talk) 05:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have completed this merge. --LT910001 (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Middle vesical artery]]
Talk:Hope, New Zealand

message: I wonder whether there really was an early settler "Lady Jane Hope"? - see section on German place names. I have been able to find references to a settler named "Jane Hope" - http://www.nzetc.org/tm/scholarly/tei-NHSJ05_03-t1-body1-d9.html- Mrs. Hope that is. Could she be the same person? I'm curious because I'm about to move to Hope.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simon Crase (talk • contribs) 02:38, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lady Jane Hope
Talk:10 years without the right of correspondence

message: I tried hard and failed to find any critical discussion of the film. I cannot even find how this subject is covered or even mentioned in the filn besides its title. IMO it is WP:UNDUE to list it here, per MOS:POPCULT. - Altenmann >talk 17:00, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film
Template talk:1962 AFL season by team

message: Please leave the Texas as "Dallas Texans". At this point, there were two teams playing in Dallas.
:Yes but they are in completly different leagues. Should be called Dallas. Same with New York, just New York would be sufficent since the NY teams are in different leagues. HoosierState 04:09, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Only use nicknames when they are in the same league otherwise it is not nessecary. HoosierState 04:14, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

text: The key is at this time they were not merged so we didn't have 1 complete NFL. Its like having 2 seperate sports. Also the link links to exact team so there shouldn't be any confusion. HoosierState 04:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Thats fine I don't really care about the AFL anyway, haha. HoosierState 04:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christian music/Structure

message: The proposed structures only relate to articles about singers or bands.  Might we not also want structures for articles about genres and liturgical forms?--Mockingbird0 (talk) 18:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed structures incomplete

message: I had not read this page before (I don't know why), but I noticed a couple of things I want to bring up.
First, in the infobox guideline it has: "born = {{birth date..." That's the old way. If you look at Template:Infobox musical artist you'll see it's now: "birth_date = | birth_place =" And this way you don't need to put < br > after the {{birth date...
It's good to have a WikiProject for Christian music (I'm now a member), but why do we need a infobox guideline for Christian music when there's already one for all musical artists?
The other thing is: there's a section heading here called "Musical career"; this grammatically incorrect. It should simply be "Music career" (or just Career). There are many things that can be called musical, but a career is not one. --Musdan77 (talk) 01:04, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, so if there's no objections I'll go ahead and make those corrections now. --Musdan77 (talk) 00:07, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A couple of issues 

message: I see that someone above noted that the structures do not cover genres, but I feel that this topic will need a seperate section to discuss it in. My biggest gripe with the Christian music genre pages is that, well, they're not actually genres. They are notable scenes which need articles, but there isn't actually any difference between Christian metal and heavy metal aside from the lyrics. Yes, we need the article, but I don't feel it's appropriate to treat the subject as a seperate genre; the genre infoboxes from such articles should be removed, and the articles should focus on the scene. (Not yet logged in, will log in later) 143.92.1.33 (talk) 01:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: They are genres. There is a difference between the two items other than lyrics. The lifestyle of the performers is radically different. The message is different as well. There are distinct publications related to the genre. There are labels marketed to represent the market. There are broadcasts that are geared to the genre. While the goal is to be accepted by mainstream metal for its musical qualities, it still stands completely alone on other levels. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:32, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More about genres
Talk:Hush kit

message: Has a hush kit any disadvantages? Weight? Higher fuel consumption? Anything else? --79.194.192.184 (talk) 20:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cons? 

message: "It should also be made clear that, while reducing noise pollution considerably, no hush kit can silence an aircraft engine."
: I removed this sentence from the article. What does it mean? Surely nothing can silence an aircraft engine or an airplane short of flying it inside in a sound-proof building; it flies through the air creating massive air vibrations, for crying out loud. It would be much better to have a comparison between engines without hush kits (including modern ones that don't need them) and engines with hush kits in the article. (It's also unencyclopedic; "it should be made clear" shouldn't appear in Wikipedia outside a quote.)--Prosfilaes (talk) 14:35, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silence 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christian music/To-do

message: OK, I am back from my Wikibreak and I am going to start going through the names submitted for proposed articles. If they do not meet notability, then I will delete them from the article requests. There is no sense in having them there if they do not meet those requirements. Then we shall start building some articles. Let's do this thing! Canyouhearmenow 14:42, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Hi everyone,
I am doing a random walk through Wikipedia, and I noticed :Category:Christian musical groups by genre. This category contains many genres of Christian music, but does not contain Contemporary Christian Music.
I suggest that we do the following:
# Create :Category:Contemporary Christian Music groups.
# Make it a subcategory of :Category:Contemporary Christian music and :Category:Christian musical groups by genre.
# Move CCM group articles into it from :Category:Contemporary Christian music.
--Kevinkor2 (talk) 11:06, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggest new category: Contemporary Christian Music groups
Talk:Air data computer

message: jkl  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.235.172.229 (talk) 13:33, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

message: I have added a paragraph about these, which are more compact than most ADC units. I have provided one link, this may want to be improved or changed to a different type of link.
I was slightly involved in the design of that product 15 years ago, but have no current interest or involvement. However it would be good to show some items from other manufacturers, if someone is able to do that?
Generally, the article needs some expansion, I think
Tiger99 (talk) 22:39, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Data Unit 

message: I removed the following sentence because it's obviously wrong; there were lots of patents before 1971, such as this 1954 patent. (Not to mention that claiming "first" based on a patent is WP:ORIGINAL.)
 The first air data computer patented in the US was developed by John H. Andresen in February 1971.
KenShirriff (talk) 04:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed wrong statement about first air data computer
Talk:Attitude and heading reference system

message: I think this stub only addresses one side, the commercial system.  It also needs to adress the algorithm.Degens (talk) 11:59, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

message: I think this should actually state:
* yaw, pitch, and roll
* heading, bank, and elevation
Yaw and heading are the same thing. Granitepeak99 (talk) 20:13, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: They're not the same thing. Yaw is a change in heading. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heading, Pitch, Yaw? 

message: Was the text on this page copied to https://www.xsens.com/tags/ahrs or from it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trombonehero (talk • contribs) 14:56, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text copying?
Talk:Cockpit display system

message: "The average transport aircraft in the mid-1970s had more than 100 cockpit instruments and controls, and the primary flight instruments were already crowded with indicators, crossbars, and symbols. In other words, the growing number of cockpit elements were competing for cockpit space and pilot attention (see Glass cockpit)" is not a reputable source. Not sure what should be done about this, but it's not good the way it is. --24.252.132.185 (talk) 15:41, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is fixed now. The part was a rewrite of a text which was in the Glass Cockpit article, also without any source. But I think I found the relevant source about it. Hervegirod (talk) 16:02, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Two-star rank

message: Absolutely astonishing that this entire article is unsourced.68.144.172.8 (talk) 11:42, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: This article appears to contain an error common to many articles, see Talk:Five-star rank#Other affected articles and the discussion that immediately precedes it. Andrewa (talk) 01:14, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related discussion
Talk:Jacob A. Collins

message: This article does not follow WP:NPOV but is completely biased editorially, e.g. "Jacob Collins is one of the great painters of Classical Realism, a movement that seeks to put the artistry back into art and to take us back behind, beyond, the deformations of Dada and its many unlovely progeny."  Tyrenius (talk) 04:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Balthus Through the Looking Glass

message: Just a note to confirm that edit by IP 216.94.11.2 removing film director category templates was reverted by me in error. I've since rmv director category (as it causes docu title to appear under Canadian directors). My mistake and apologies to IP 216.94.11.2. All best --Jumbolino (talk) 21:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:Danijel Subotić

message: The source now given is written in Serbian/Bosnian/Croatian language, have a even better source? And per Wikipedia, the POB left it blank due to the people may choose to keep it secret. Matthew_hk tc 06:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POB and national team

message: According to the third source it specifically states that he intends to play for Serbia from now on, yet on the page it is written that he is Swiss and of Bosnian descent.[]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolguyboki (talk • contribs) 22:41, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Serbian