Talk:Alloparenting

message: Is allomothering a mergeable subtopic of alloparenting? Or does someone wish to focus one article on humans and the other on non-human animals? (Or is there something else I'm missing?)
(This is not a formal merge request ... yet. I want to get my facts straight first.) --SoledadKabocha (talk) 06:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge allomothering? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Alloparenting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060915032734/http://www.oberlin.edu/faculty/ndarling/transition/group9/efekorean.html to http://www.oberlin.edu/faculty/ndarling/transition/group9/efekorean.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: QUERY: Why would not "alloparenting" include teachers and child-care providers, who in most cases provide, as a team, more hours of parenting contact between adult and child per day, and in many cases per year.  "In loco parentis" is a principle of common law by which educators in a secondary boarding school step into the guardianship shoes of the parents.  Would this not push the percentage of alloparented children in the U.S. substantially higher?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.104.154.167 (talk) 15:06, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are not teachers alloparents? 

message: I think this article is very good and contains many good examples. I think that because there is a benefits section there should also be a section that talks of the disadvantages of alloparenting. I also think that even more examples are added and that some pictures should be added as well. 
Kralikr (talk) 17:02, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions 

message: Hello Wiki community,
This is just a quick post to let anyone interested know that I am planning some update/edits to this page in the coming weeks. I hope to contribute clear, well-researched and interesting edits to this page, and am open to any feedback or suggestions. 
Cheers,
Madison246 (talk) 04:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planning Edits 

message: Article is verbose and unclear, e.g. a section talks about "this study" without naming it; sections use names or acronyms, dive into sudden detail, and so on. The images all seem decorative - not one is definitively about alloparenting, for instance. Substantial work is needed to rewrite most of the article to explain the topic to someone who doesn't actually know it already and who wants a quick overview of the topic. (The old advice is to imagine your reader is a geologist.)  Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:35, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work needed 

message: There is a genetic advantage for the species as a whole if individuals without offspring alloparent. The same applies to orphansThe Evolution of Alloparental Care and Adoption in Mammals and Birds. Marianne L. Riedman. The Quarterly Review of Biology. Vol. 57, No. 4 (Dec., 1982), pp. 405-435 (31 pages). Published By: The University of Chicago Press. A neo-darwinian perspective. Species proliferation trumps individual lives. Tradimus (talk) 01:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Benefit to the species

message: — Assignment last updated by Useeikick (talk) 19:27, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Physiological Ecology of Animals