lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Politics of Vatican City

message: It would be nice if the article discussed the "citizenry" of the Vatican City State.  Do monsignori and bishops have "citizenship" in the Vatican City State? If so, do their respective countries of origin (especially in the case of the residential diocesan bishops) recognize such dual citizenship?  Aloysius Patacsil 09:05, Aug 21, 2004 (UTC)
:Cardinals living in Rome, even if not working at the Curia of the worldwide Church, have citizenship, such as the Cardinal Vicar. I think monsignori and bishops working for the Curia are appointed to citizenship but without automatism. Swiss Guards are citizens. A residential diocesan bishop from another state is, I'm quite sure, no Vatican state citizen. As to the dual citizenship: I can only speak for Germany, but it recognizes it by the juridical trick that the citizens do not ask for it formally but are appointed out of office. That is clear for Curia officials. There have been some silent voices that enthroning, as opposed to simple citizenship, puts away the German citizenship with reference to an assumed pre-1914 practice. That's however not the position of the German executive, which has sent an election card to Pope Benedict. (Who has not used it as he felt it unappropriate for a foreign head of state.) --84.154.87.182 (talk) 10:28, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Citizenry

message: The template featured on this page, Politics of the Vatican City, is to a major degree a misstatement of the jobs performed by the organizations to which it refers. Perhaps it would be better to rename the template something like "Roman Curia", which includes both the temporal and ecclesiastical responsibilities of the various organizations?
Lordthees 21:59, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming of template 

message: I made a new template: , but kept the old Vatican City one. Most of the Dicasteries of the Roman Curia have nothing to do with Vatican City so this was logical.
CanonLawJunkie (talk) 20:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New Template

message: The vatican city is an absolute -monarchy; no absolute elect-monarchy, because the bishop of rome is ex officio head of state. there are no elections in the vatican city. the election of the pope takes place in the "diocese of rome", not in the state "vatican city".--138.246.7.82 10:06, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  absolute elect-monarchy 

message: the table in the executive section lists a date as the party. im not entirely sure if this is a mistake or supposed to happen, however based on the lack of dates in the area where there should be dates i am inclined to believe it is a mistake. Gaismagorm (talk) 14:18, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  unusual table in the executive section
Talk:John Beaufort, 1st Earl of Somerset

message: I would suggest that you form a civilised discussion on whether to include first names here. This should help you to reach a peaceful consensus. Please contact me if you would like help! Abcdefghijklm 13:35, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reveal Names

message: This article contradicts itself, was he born in 1371 or 1373? PatGallacher (talk) 11:33, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: My understanding is that his date of birth is uncertain. john k (talk) 03:05, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it at least known if he was older than Catherine of Lancaster? СЛУЖБА (talk) 23:57, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Thanks for pointing this out. I was confused. Could someone at least change it so that ir shows a  questionable birth year?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.124.1.82 (talk) 22:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: I have categorised him under "Marquesses in the Peerage of England" as he was not only Marquess of Dorset (which has a subcat of its own) but also Marquess of Somerset (which does not). Alekksandr (talk) 21:18, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Marquess
Talk:Whale

message: what do whales eat 212.55.60.18 (talk) 10:08, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: They eat zooplankton and other large mammals 2A00:23C6:BE86:B401:18BC:AE91:27FB:3F52 (talk) 06:43, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  what do whales eat
Talk:Paul Dirac

message: Add to the end of relevant personal life:
A bust of Paul Dirac now resides at Florida State University near Dirac Library along with other notable figures in STEM, many of which he brought with him to Florida State. ChrisBernhardt (talk) 04:29, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this would fit in best in the Legacy section, but there are already several images there and it would overrun the text. This is a useful photo, but I'm not sure where it could go.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:20, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 June 2023 

message: I'm removing this claim:
"Dirac further postulated the existence of gravitational waves, declaring them to have "physical significance" in his 1959 lecture at the Lindau Meetings"
Gravitational waves have a long history, including postulates by Laplace and Poincare. See for example
Cervantes-Cota, Jorge L., Salvador Galindo-Uribarri, and George F. Smoot. "A brief history of gravitational waves." Universe 2.3 (2016): 22. 
or
https://www.americanscientist.org/article/the-secret-history-of-gravitational-waves Johnjbarton (talk) 14:11, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gravitational waves were postulated in the 19th century. 

message: The view on religion section is, IMO, too large compared to its role in Dirac's life. It is 4 times longer than the section on Honors. That seems out of whack. Johnjbarton (talk) 22:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue emphasis on religion.
Talk:Psilocybin

message: I think this article needs to be delisted as an FA. In addition to the sourcing issues mentioned in the section above, quite a bit of the article seems off-topic in that it's talking about the effect of psilocybin mushrooms which is not necessarily the same thing as psilocybin effect (the mushrooms have a distinct article). Alexbrn (talk) 11:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA Review 

message: I have changed in History section, Modern subsection: "Further backlash against LSD usage swept psilocybin along with it into the Schedule I category of illicit drugs in 1970." -It was specifically the actions of the Nixon administration that put psilocybin in Schedule I. This previous wording makes it sound as if there was a vote, or process in Congress, or some similar input from the public. There was no vote. There was no "backlash" involved in the legal regulation, except in the sense that Nixon made all known psychedelic substances into "Schedule I: no accepted medical value" all at the same time. Perhaps the public acceptance of this can be attributed as part of a "backlash", but it was Nixon's decision alone. Cuvtixo (talk) 02:54, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: A source would be needed. Bon courage (talk) 04:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History "Further backlash against LSD" misinformation. It was all Nixon 

message: — Assignment last updated by ChasYoung4 (talk) 04:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Wikipedia for the Medical Editor

message: Re this. Medical content should be based on high-quality sources. Non-MEDLINE indexed Frontiers Media journals, and in particular Cureus, are suspect. Bon courage (talk) 14:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: While I see your point about Cureus, all of these articles were acquired through PubMED and are all from peer-reviewed journals. ChasYoung4 (talk) 14:50, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:MEDFAQ#I have a source from PubMed, so that's reliable right?. Bon courage (talk) 14:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent large changes
Talk:Micronation

message: Is Confederate States of America a micronation or amicrostate? No country recognized it. But it did have things few micronations have, like a legislature, army, etc. deisenbe (talk) 19:26, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The Confederacy would be an unrecognised state, that de facto controlled some areas of the southern united states.AxderWraith Crimson (talk) 17:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Micronation is a 20th century concept, so I don't think the CSA can be considered as such. Also, while the CSA wasn't recognized as a sovereign state, it was recognized as a belligerent by the United Kingdom. pandakekok9 (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It also wasn't a "micro" anything-- the Confederate States covered close to two million km2 and were home to nine million people.  PepperBeast (talk) 14:20, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The CSA was a (failed) secession. Literally dozens of similar examples throughout history. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 15:10, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confederate States of America 

message: What are the requirements to add or remove a micronation from the section "Notable micronations", because almost all of them are connected or associated with fraud or financial scam projects? Meanwhile there are micronations like Ladonia (art), Molossia and Atlantium (hobby), Flandrensis (ecologic) and many other projects? The section "Micronations based on historical claims" is more based on facts. I propose to remove the section and just keep the reference to the page List of micronations. Delle89 (talk) 20:23, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable micronations 
Talk:August Hlond

message: I have moved polish cardinals into articles without "cardinal" because it is unnatrual (less than Cardinal August Hlondl). I ónly couldn't remove Stefan Wyszynski (I dont know why). Radomil talk 12:22, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Polish cardinals

message: I've removed this page's entry from Wikipedia:Requested moves due to a lack of consensus (and comments!) on the move. If this changes, feel free to add another request. --Lox (t,c) 16:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move to [[August Hlond]]

message: Apart from his controversial relationship with Jews, it would be a good idea to try and explain why he was proposed for beatification in the first place, because currently the article is too centered on accusations that were later filed against him. He was obviously persecuted by the Nazis during the war and by the Soviets after the war, and so he obviously had a lot of enemies, to the point of being considered a virtual martyr by many of his admirers. ADM (talk) 07:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Other issues

message: "Hlond had always consistently condemned the Nazi persecution of the Jews." Can we have some evidence to support this assertion? When and how did he condemn the genocide of the Polish Jews? Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 11:01, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wartime role

message: For the interested. I thought the title a little strange considering the content, but anyway. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:11, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/if-wikipedia-says-so-its-true/ If Wikipedia Says So– It’s True]
Talk:AElfric

message: Article was originally at "Aefric", however all but the first reference to his name calls him "Aelfric", and another poster has commented that "Aefric" is incorrect. Moved article to "Aelfric" The Anome
:...which is how most readers would look for him.  Fortunately, a redirect will bring the normal reader here, to this owlishly renamed entry heading. I look forward to seeing OEconomy as an entry heading... --Wetman 12:57, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Bond

message: I think everyone forgot about James Bond!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_bond
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.127.126.136 (talk) 01:44, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Bond 

message: Issued by Issuer? come on.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.125.69.165 (talk) 19:19, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bond (finance) ... issued by Issuer? 

message: When a ship is taken as a prize during war, and rather than being burnt, is sailed to a port, which form of bond is meant by this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vdrj2 (talk • contribs) 15:09, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ship Bonding 

message: This was tagged because far too many partial matches that are unlikely to be confused with the term "bond" and quite a lot of redlinks of questionable notablilty. Redlinks are dealt with, partial matches remain. Boleyn3 (talk) 16:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: What is the origin of this surname? Badagnani (talk) 04:34, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin
Talk:Sindarin

message: In the examples of the i-umlaut/affection, there is an example given as hên becoming hîn in the plural. Now, it says that this means child and children and this made me think of Narn i Chîn Húrin or The Children of Húrin. Narn i Chîn Húrin was written as Narn i Hîn Húrin so English speakers wouldn't pronounced the ch the same way as in church, and this was a choice made by Christopher Tolkien, IIRC. He later came to regret this. So, my question is more along the lines of, where this example is from and if it's perhaps supposed to be written with <ch> rather than <h>. Anyway, just a thought I had while randomly looking at Wikipedia. 212.55.53.166 (talk) 03:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct about this change: “... Narn i Chîn Húrin, which is so spelled at all occurrences, but was improperly changed by me [= Christopher Tolkien] to Narn i Hîn Húrin in Unfinished Tales (because I did not want Chîn to be pronounced like Modern English chin)” (The Lost Road, History of Middle-earth IV, p. 322, §25). However there can be no real doubt that “child/children” on its own is hên/hîn, e. g. in War of the Jewels, History of Middle-earth XI, p. 403 Tolkien writes: “S[indarin] has hên, pl[ural] hîn, mostly used as a prefix in patronymics or metronymics: as Hîn Húrin ‘The Children of Húrin’”. What makes the difference is the article: hîn means “children”, but if you add the plural article in “the” it triggers mutation and the whole phrase becomes i chîn “the childern” (i hîn would be the mutation result of a hypothetical word *sîn with the singular article instead). Lammengollon (talk) 11:08, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  WP:NOTFORUM. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:41, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hên and hîn 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :The Silmarillion/Sindarin and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 26#The Silmarillion/Sindarin until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TNstingray (talk) 01:35, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Silmarillion/Sindarin" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :JRR Tolkien/Sindarin and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 26#JRR Tolkien/Sindarin until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  TNstingray (talk) 16:26, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "JRR Tolkien/Sindarin" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 
Talk:Church of the SubGenius

message: Labeling the Church of the SubGenius a "parody-religion" is an insulting term towards members. SubGenius doctrine has been practiced for nearly 40 years by it's adherents, longer for those that have studied it before the Church's official creation. This slanderous wording should be made NEUTRAL and it should be listed as a RELIGION. It is just as valid as Christianity, Islam or Scientology and to dismiss it is a flagrant disregard for neutrality.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truthbomb427 (talk • contribs) 05:49, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's an obvious joke, like the "Flying Spaghetti Monster" that seems to have usurped it in popularity. 2A00:23C5:FE18:2701:4CBF:36F0:9F51:8CEC (talk) 15:40, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insulting language 

message: The redirect Alt.slack has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  1234qwer1234qwer4 10:14, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Alt.slack]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Schutzstaffel

message: the naZionist ss rune has a similar form like the form of israel on the world map. 
some ss leaders like reinhard heydrich and adolf eichmann said, that they were NaZionist Zionists. 2001:9E8:D2C4:CE00:CC92:F73D:D721:B837 (talk) 11:43, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  zionist meaning of the ss rune  

message: In the third paragraph of the article on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schutzstaffel , the Israel flag is inserted at the top of the pop-up link to the linked page on Sicherheitsdienst (SD). The SD was a police arm of Nazi Germany and should not be represented or confused as the State of Israel. 128.84.124.150 (talk) 05:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the result of template vandalism. I've purged the cache so it should be fixed now. Nardog (talk) 06:08, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag of Israel appears in popup link to Sicherheitsdienst 

message: In the SS Cavalry section, this article links to a redirect, Pripyat swamps (punitive operation), an inappropriate and euphemistic description of the event. This should be replaced with the article title itself: Pripyat Marshes massacres. Corundum Conundrum (CC) 15:33, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Thank you for the suggestion. — Diannaa (talk) 16:13, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replace redirect with link to article 

message: The pagan SS marriage ceremony mentioned in the second paragraph of the "Ideology" section is called "Eheweihe" (literally "Marriage consecration") and not "Ehewein" (that would translate to "Marriage wine" in Germany). The correct plural form to be used in the context of the sentence would be Eheweihen, i.e. the full sentence should be:  Church weddings were replaced with SS Eheweihen, a pagan ceremony invented by Himmler.
Here's a German source using the correct spelling: https://ghdi.ghi-dc.org/sub_image.cfm?image_id=2050&language=german
Note: The wrong spelling has proliferated through the English internet by pages who obviously used Wikipedia as a source.
Kitzing (CC) 10:03, 31 May 2024 (CET)
:Done. Thanks for the suggestion. — Diannaa (talk) 11:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 31 May 2023
Talk:Waffen-SS

message: Should ‘comparative’ be ‘comparable’?  Or was the intention to say ‘xxx compared’? Wikiain (talk) 06:58, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  #Casualties 

message: I'm looking at another article that refers to "SS soldiers" but that doesn't seem to be terminology used here. Has there been a discussion on the correct term? I did find Talk:Waffen-SS/Archive_2#SS were not soldiers from 2016 ( who did the actual source-based research towards an answer) but it seems to have been inconclusive. ☆ Bri (talk) 05:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don’t know what other article you are referring to, but I believe it’s best to refer to them as troops, at this time. There’s been more of a general consensus reached as to how to refer to them in the last five years. Kierzek (talk) 12:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, it was Fury (2014 film) ☆ Bri (talk) 07:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Bri In German, "SS-Soldaten" (= SS soldiers) is a proper term, it's used by the German Historical Museum in their article covering the Waffen-SS (https://www.dhm.de/lemo/kapitel/der-zweite-weltkrieg/kriegsverlauf/waffen-ss.html), for instance, and in numerous books/scientific articles, of course. If the general concensus here on the EN wiki established the term SS troops, that's fine, but "SS-Soldaten", "SS-Truppen" (SS troops) or "Soldat(en) der Waffen-SS"/"Waffen-SS-Soldat(en) (= soldier(s) of the Waffen-SS/Waffen-SS soldier(s)) are all established (and widely used) terms used in German literature/scientific works. GeeGee (talk) 07:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology for members
Talk:St. Peter's Basilica

message: Me,Angelo Floresino trusted in God
and Italy Country 109.245.33.10 (talk) 21:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  God Blessing Vatican Church 

message: If you're using AD it should be placed *before* the year number, e.g. AD 300, not 300 AD ("in the year of the Lord 300"). CE, if used, is correctly place *after* the number. 2A00:23C6:CB80:6F01:E8F6:981C:841D:57EE (talk) 10:55, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Per MOS:ERA,  is an accepted formatting. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed generally the most common, I'd think. Johnbod (talk) 14:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  AD 

message: What day and month did st peter die 71.125.35.11 (talk) 16:41, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion
Talk:List of bishops of Warmia

message: kpjas -- this is a nice list, but I'm not sure it really needs to be here -- are we going to put lists of bishops of every fairly large diocese on the site?  also, could you perhaps do some clean up and change names to the commonly used English spellings where appropriate?  I changed a couple, but am not sure of lots of them.  Thanks! JHK
JHK
You may have a point: do we really need that?
I may have started this with the bishops of Tours, mainly because for early history it is important. For later history perhaps not so.
J Folmer
Hello,First, I must say I hold your opinion  in very high esteem.
The reason I put the list here is to give some background on history
of Warmia that is complex not as onesided as Helga Jonat presents it.
We have Polish names on the list as well not only German.
The Warmia bishopric is rather special and its history has links to other
historical events. Besides we have lists of other bishops as well.
Sorry for the spelling I meant to put it right ASAP.
One good thing Helga does she makes me look deeper in the Polish
history after the WW II that is full of propaganda I was taught at school.
Kpjas
----
Can we extend this list to include Bishop Kaller who we already have article on. (Forget his first name right now.) Rmhermen 10:13 Aug 19, 2002 (PDT)
----
I think that since Wiki offical goal is to gather all knowledge of mankind then this list is in the right place. Furthermore, I think that this should go on some kind of Special:Categories - perhaps similar to Bishops of Honolulu. I would like to see categories of several levels - religious officials -> to bishops of x province. But I am just passing by here (wrote about Jan Olbracht Waza). Take care --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 18:06, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't help overhearing: I've just started Bishop of Sion, who was an important prince-bishop in the Swiss canton of Valais until 1630. Roman archbishoprics should certainly all have entries, for a start. Then selected historical dioceses, without running to one of those extensive yet incomplete lists... Wetman 18:28, 27 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: OK, I see another German v. Polish revert war. What exactly is wrong with writing Marcin Kromer? I known Martin is the English name, but Marcin Kromer is the name of the article. - Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 12:21, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Martin Kromer is the name the catholic encyclopedia uses (), and also outranks Marcin Kromer on Google ~700:500 (:). Maybe the article should even be moved, but in any case the other variants of the name should be mentioned in the text.-- Chris 73 | Talk 18:36, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marcin and Martin