lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rumble Fighter

message: NHAA does not belong on the wiki. 24.60.229.33 (talk) 19:37, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NHAA 

message: I am not good at editing wikipedia pages, but someone should definitely say something about Rumble fighter no longer being hosted my OG planet, it being totally hidden by OG planet and all that thingies.
It still exists! It's called Rumble fighter Revolution!
It's the same game and it's still with Nimonix!
Don't let OGPlanet hide the information!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.12.59.26 (talk) 19:13, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Rumble Fighter Revolution

message: Hey, quit changing "Avenger" to "Brawler". The official name on Gem Fighter is Avenger. Thanks. 
AxonZin (talk) 19:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Information

message: The skills that are coming should be cited. Dragonsblast (talk) 05:14, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation
Talk:Timna Valley Park

message: The name should be changed to reflect the official status of the valley, and possibly to allow merging with "Timna Valley". Sreifa (talk) 13:14, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a national park, but a nature reserve? 

message: I think these pages should be merged.--Sreifa (talk) 06:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. —Ynhockey (Talk) 21:46, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Festival Rock y Ruedas de Avándaro

message: This is a very interesting article about an important historical event of which, until today, I was totally unaware.  I say this from the perspective of one who has always been fascinated by tales of the Norte Americano Woodstock.  My problem with this article is that it is virtually unreadable, due to inclusion of every possible name of everyone involved.  The wiki-term is laundry listing.  Too much, already!  Everybody wants to make sure their favorites are not left out, and the result is that, of the trickle of traffic arriving on this page, almost no one will read it.  Sorry.  If you wish to document an event historically, significant as it is, these inclinations to include everything, to leave nothing out, have to be controlled, imo.  rags (talk) 09:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story
Talk:Yuja tea

message: Need photo of a glass of the actual tea. Badagnani (talk) 01:12, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: This seems  more folklore  than history. Can we  get a citation and clarification as to which it is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.37.173.247 (talk) 22:30, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin story
Talk:Airuno

message: Hello users, I am a student at the University of Bergamo and I took part in a project that aimed at contributing to some Wikipedia pages (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/UNIBG/Heritage_studies_and_ICT). As for this page, I translated some of the information that can be found in the Italian Wikipedia page of Airuno; more specifically, I added the section "History" and the content was taken and translated from the Italian page. As a result, I also added the section "Bibliography", where I wrote the name of the book from which information came.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laura98b (talk • contribs) 15:39, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added some information from the Italian Wikipedia page of Airuno (University Project)
Talk:Disentis

message: "Disentis/Mustér" is only an official name and does not reflect current English usage. Any search will confirm that "Disentis" is the established name and should therefore be the title of this article. Any objections to a move? mgeo talk 11:26, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: page moved. mgeo talk 21:22, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Disentis?
Talk:Japan Crude Cocktail

message: Hi , nice work!  I reviewed the article per your request, and my first thought is to keep all images aligned (default) right. Sizes should be consistent as well (220px).  Readers can simply click on the image for a larger view. The long table for the Price of Crude Oil (JCC) from 1980-2019 would probably be easier to navigate and may even look better as a 2 or 3 column table.  Hope that helps. Happy editing! Atsme 💬 📧 15:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOS
Talk:Pappas Restaurants

message: This whole article sounds like it was written by the Pappas marketing team.  I mean the section about low prices?  I'm not sure if I've been to a pricier Tex-Mex place than Pappasitos or a pricier Cajun restaurant than Pappadeaux.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.91.101.30 (talk) 19:39, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written by Marketing
Talk:Dewoitine D.21

message: Hi Wikipedians, I re-added the "Further reading" section to add in it relevant books and articles that haven't (yet) been used as sources for this article. Soon will do similar with "External links" section. Regards,DPdH (talk) 00:37, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading & External links sections.
Talk:Paul Logan (colonel)

message: On page 10 of the January 31, 1925 Exhibitors Herald there is a photo captioned of a film actor meeting with a Capt. Paul Logan and an assistent of the mayor in San Francisco, all without any further explanation. If it can be established that this is the same person / Army officer as the Logan of this article, this would be a public domain photo available for use. Deanlaw (talk) 03:44, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1925 Photo of a "Capt. Paul Logan"
Talk:Imbersago

message: I'm Irene Rovelli, a first year student of the University of Bergamo. On this page I have added the translations that I made from the Italian wikipedia page of Imbersago. I added these parts (history, languages and dialects, religion, culture) for the university project https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GLAM/UNIBG/Heritage_studies_and_ICT  — Preceding unsigned comment added by I.rovelli1 (talk • contribs) 16:22, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added some information from the italian wikipedia page of "Imbersago"
Talk:Lynn Huggins-Cooper

message: Okay, so the COI template is back. When is it okay to remove it? WP:AUTO says Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged but it doesn't prohibit it entirely. Also, we have a couple of inline cites here, several other people have edited, and I've done some cleanup to remove POV. How else can we improve the article so we don't have to have this ugly template? Nobody of Consequence (talk) 16:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of Interest 
Talk:Where the Rainbow Ends

message: The play is the only article using this title and so should be at the plain title (no clarifier).--ShelfSkewed Talk 22:42, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: The current version of the article says that the last professional production was in 1959-60, but the article also said (I have removed it because of unreliable source and deadlink):
1976-77 production at the Gardner Theatre, Brighton, featured Simon Gipps-Kent.RememberingBrandon.net / Simon Gipps-Kent
The article on Gipps-Kent also mentions this production but similarly has a (different) unreliable source which is now a deadlink. This is probably resolvable with some newspaper archive digging, but it may be better in any case to say "the last known professional production". Tacyarg (talk) 13:46, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last professional production
Talk:Polytechnic University of the Philippines San Pedro

message: :Image:Ph seal laguna.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 22:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal laguna.png

message: *The page was then cut and pasted rather than moved; 
*To have coherence with other subcategories of Polytechnic University of the Philippines, thus dropping those pages that were redirected in their acronyms such as this.
--Axxand (talk) 12:12, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested Move 
Talk:Polytechnic University of the Philippines Santa Rosa

message: :Image:Ph seal laguna.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 22:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ph seal laguna.png

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support per nom. --Yaffyaff (talk) 11:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: When the entrance exam started  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.96.137 (talk) 07:21, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  When the entrance exam started
Talk:Howick Hall

message: Wondered if this page ....with a photogtaph of the bathing house built by the 2nd Early would be of interest
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.32.133 (talk) 19:56, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bathing House - Howick Hall 
Talk:Mark H. Buzby

message: I missed this at the time.
Another contributor cut the amount of text in the article in half, in the process removing three perfectly valid WP:RS.  They justified this large excision with the edit summary: "Edited, violation of  and biography requirements. Neutrality is not even attempted, and it casts the subject in a negative light.."
First, one can't "violate" , as it is only an essay, not a policy...  And, the essay doesn't recommend this kind of radical excision.
Second, I think that an excision of 4K worth of material, half an article, requires more explanation than will fit in an edit summary -- I am disappointed to see no attempt to add a fuller explanation on the talk page.
Third, I am disturbed that no attempt was made to preserve the WP:RS.  WP:RS can't violate WP:NPOV, without regard to whatever concern the exciser may have had about how those WP:RS were quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
If no explanation is forthcoming, after a reasonable period of time, I will restore some or all of this excised material, after making a good faith attempt to guess at and address whatever unnamed concerns prompted the excision in the first place.  
Cheers!  User:Geo Swan (talk) 19:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment
Talk:Leaf valve

message: I suggest this page becomes a Redirect to Check valve. Biscuittin (talk) 23:04, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I suggest that instead of redirecting the audience to Check valve, we should redirect them to Reed valve. They are the same items, just different names. "Check valve" is an umbrella term used for any one-way valve design. --IronA238 (talk) 01:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Page Redirect
Talk:Edward Davenport (fraudster)

message: There seems to be some debate about the addition of an entire section regarding Davenport's religious beliefs. I agree that this section is unnecessary, for two main reasons. First, the DAILYMAIL is no longer considered a reliable source for most things. Second, it puts UNDUE focus on his religion. A sentence or two, maybe, would be fine, but not a full section with quotes. Primefac (talk) 13:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion 

message: Davenport might have been behind the alleged party in Mayfair in London at which Simionov was stabbed to death on 1/1/2019.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.146.195.236 (talk) 09:17, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mayfair
Talk:Ros Hill

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 15:52, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot 

message: I wondered why we had called it that. Ros Castle seems to be widely used also. I don't want to start a fight! I also don't know what procedures we use for possible naming debates (ahem, full situation is a little more nuanced than that but it's all I'm writing down right now!)  I'll ping  and will look forward to reading others' views. Best to all, DBaK (talk) 23:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ros Hill not Ros Castle
Talk:Craster

message: The link to Stay in Craster is blatant commercial advertising.
Why has it been allowed on this page?
The link should be deleted asap.
Postalmag (talk) 00:18, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - you could have done it yourself, see WP:SPAM. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:58, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blatant advertising on page
Talk:Acid-base physiology

message: This article appears to have been written on the basis of a single author whose views are not endorsed by modern medicine.  -- Beland (talk) 18:24, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The only referenced source for the claim that Stewart's approach is correct is Stewart himself, which is obviously insufficient. -- Beland (talk) 18:30, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliability and notability

message: It seems to me that Acid-base homeostasis should be the main article for this topic, and that acid-base physiology should be merged into it, as well as acid-base imbalance and much of mixed disorder of acid-base balance. If no one objects, I'll do it. I'm posting word on those pages and the The Doctor's Mess. - Draeco (talk) 04:45, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - Draeco (talk) 16:04, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Parliamentary inquiries by the Belgian Federal Parliament

message: I see that the headings are written in English, but for some reason, the text is in (I presume), Flemish. Does anyone know why this is ? Surely, on the English Wikipedia, the whole article should be written in English. 
RASAM (talk) 23:09, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The passages in Dutch are the formal titles of the inqueries, and should ofcource be incorporated in English paragraphs explaining the inquiry, but I haven't found the time yet--its somewhere on my todo-list for 2008 :-) maarten (talk) 01:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation.

message: I've removed the text for now because I'm not sure it's in the public domain of GFDL. Can someone please provide proof that it complies with Wikipedia's copyright requirements, before reverting back to the English only version? -- Jeandré, 2008-04-18t11:03z
: It is a list (non-creative work), of the official Dutch names of the inquiries (facts, non-creative work; explained in the paragraph above), published by a governement entity (public info) and interspersed with translations by User:Martijn_Hoekstra and burgeoning descriptions (creative work by Wikipedia). Please, do err on the other side if you are doubting if you should delete info; otherwise you give a casual Wikipedia-contributor all lot of frustrations. Cheers, maarten (talk) 15:49, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation?
Talk:River Derwent, North East England

message: Hello. I have just seen on the UK Wikipedians' Notice Board Complete To Do List (I think that's the name!) that a request for a River Derwent, Tyne and Wear page has been lodged. I think we could create the River Derwent Tyne and Wear page and have it redirected to this page or vice versa. I would like to hear other opinions on this. Somebody else may do this for me if there is no objections in the next few days (today is Thursday 14th May 2009). Thanks. Aberdeen fc (talk) 16:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  River Derwent, Tyne and Wear
Talk:Where the Wild Things Are (disambiguation)

message: I don't see any of the recent changes as improvements: lumping in the uses related to Sendak's book with all the others, and adding a lot of information that simply repeats what's already in the links or is not necessary for disambiguating the uses. What is your reasoning behind taking an organized, clean page and making it a single, overworded list?--ShelfSkewed Talk 17:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: MOS:DAB. The primary topic and introductory line should be separate. Descriptions should be "just sufficient to allow the reader to find the correct link." "Very small sections [such as the 2-entry section for the adaptations] may impede navigation, and should usually be avoided."--Cúchullain t/c 18:14, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's fine--with one minor restoration (and I know we disagree on this issue, but if we leave it off, someone else will add it, anyway). Thanks!--ShelfSkewed Talk 21:09, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, the song. My bad; as much as it is counterintuitive to me to leave entries with no articles or sections in articles of their own, that does seem to be the preferred way to do things. Thanks for the catch.--Cúchullain t/c 15:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. Also, I should have said before that in general I agree that very small sections should be avoided, but I usually make an exception for works derived from the primary topic, if there is one, so that they can be easily found or easily ignored depending on what the user is looking for. Best, --ShelfSkewed Talk 16:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 12 edits
Talk:River Till, Northumberland

message: The map which purports to show the position of the Till in England can hardly hope to succeed with a point feature - one which appears to show just its source which as the article realtes does not go by the name of Till in any case. Can someone who knows what they are doing with maps on Wikipedia (ie not me!) replace the point with a line feature, I wonder? It would improve the article. cheers Geopersona (talk) 19:42, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading map
Talk:Boris Stefanov

message: Maybe in 1963 or 1964  another Boris Stefanov was the one having recieved  Dimitrov Order: professor Boris Stefanov, the famous botanist, born in 1894 and who had to celebrate in 1964 70 yrs.
Anyway Boris Stefanov, the Romanian communist politician, had also have then a similar age and not  80yrs.
 
It seems nevertheless probable that Boris Stefanov, the communist leader from Romania, has not survived  the purgings  in USSR in 1940.[[Special:Contributions/ 
Cpt.schoener (talk) 23:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Maybe another Boris Stefanov
Template talk:WPNorthEastEngland

message: Hi, there seems to be a typo in the template box, I think it should say "This article IS supported by ..." Halsteadk (talk) 23:15, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: missing "is"?

message: Is there any need for two banners?  Would having one do?
*
*
-- WOSlinker (talk) 20:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Heatherdown School

message: Looking at the schooling of influential people sometimes reveals very interesting things.
Heatherdown was a very strange place.  In some ways it has had as much influence on today as the public schools and universities many of the children later attended.
The early schooling of Hitler and Wittgenstein is another example.  The co-incidence that these two figures should have attended the same school is remarkable: more so, because some argue that where the former was responsible for the killing of millions the latter appeared to do the same for ideas in the relativistic nature of his philosophy.  
Some even argue that some of the intellectual foundation, in the form of relativism, was necessary to permit certain excesses of modern art.  The apparent abandonment of responsibility in much of public life in the UK might also be underpinned by this.
The interesting question, in the case of these two, is about the school.  So a similar question could be about Heatherdown and the leader of the UK Conservative Party.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.202.192.185 (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Most of this article is somebody's personal views of the school. They are an interesting slice of autobiography, but not at all appropriate for an encyclopaedia. 86.142.245.22 (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal views
Talk:Linn (geology)

message: * What is this geographical feature called in places outside Scotland?--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 23:16, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Subsidence crater

message: A subsidence crater is a hole or depression left on the surface of an area which has had an underground (usually nuclear) explosion. Oh really? Not always. Some subsidence craters are formed by subsidence of land without an explosion. For example, if an underground pool of basaltic magma was erupted during a volcanic eruption to produce large lava flows, the underlying cavity that the magma pool sat in could subside to create a non-explosive subsidence crater like those found in Hawaii. This is because basaltic magma is way less viscous than felsic magmas, which are associated with explosive subsidence craters. BT (talk) 02:15, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are also sometimes craters formed above some hydrothermal vents associated with catastrophic dewatering caused by large sill intrusions, and there can be collapse craters formed above salt diapirs, caused by dissolution. If I ever get the time, I'll add these to the article. Mikenorton (talk) 21:28, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not always explosive 
Talk:Maryland Natural Resources Police

message: The main title of this entry incorrectly states the name of this police agency. The proper name of the agency is Maryland Natural Resources Police. There is no "Department of" in the agency's name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.37.34 (talk) 13:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The main title is incorrect 

message: I added more non-primary sources. The agency is historically significant and complies with WP:NOTE. It's me...Sallicio!\color{Red} \oplus 15:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging