lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/xantheif src

message: User:xantheif_src
    run at Fri Nov 30 00:15:07 2007 GMT
Wikipedia:             2
avg edits per page     2.00
earliest               23:10, 29 November 2007
number of unique pages 1
total                  2
2007/11  2
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
             Wikipedia:
2 Requests for adminship/xantheif src
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 00:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for xantheif src
Talk:John V. Fleming

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Jvf and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 8#Jvf until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Q28 (talk) 06:11, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Jvf" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Garrigues (disambiguation)

message: It has been suggested that this page be moved to the name Garrigues. The page currently there would of necessity be moved to a different but yet appropriate name. A discussion has been started at Talk:Garrigues#Garrigues (disambiguation). Feel free to contribute there. — Dave (Talk | contribs) 00:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible page move
Talk:The Oregon Duck

message: Question: Didn't the Oregon Duck win mascot of the year in 2007 and 2008?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.237.45 (talk) 05:58, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mascot of the year?

message: Why mention a bleacher report article?  In case the author of the this page is unaware anyone can write a bleacher report article which substantially tarnishes its reputation as a legitimate news source.  Remove that section of the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Streetballer510 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bleacher report article
Talk:Transform (mathematics)

message: In mathematics a transform is an operator applied to a function so that under the transform certain operations are simplified
That's not a definition, possibly an application, but not a definition.  So what is a transform? I only ask because I have wikilinked an article here that would not fit that definition/application, but I'm definitely talking about transforms in the article. SpinningSpark 19:40, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: agree this definition is very poor!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.60.136.7 (talk) 12:21, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

text: i tried to make change acessible for non-mathematicians and philozophers. needs cleanup, be gentle :) 84.16.123.194 (talk) 20:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

text: Agree that transformation is inappropriate, so why does the page redirect there? "Transform" is used in many contexts so that a general and once for all definition is not possible, but transformation has a definitely different meaning in standard usage. so this page should either give a brief introduction, or redirect to integral transform! 78.15.203.91 (talk) 17:24, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead sentence
Talk:Garrigues-Sainte-Eulalie

message: I propose that when a person types "Garrigues" in the search box, that the link go directly to the Garrigues (disambiguation) page. I made the suggestion in the Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests section, and I received this answer from User:Fluri:
:The "search box" goes, by default, to the article with the exact name one types. If one types Garrigues, it takes you to the page by that name. The only way to accomplish what you describe would be to rename (move) the pages to the names you want. Firstly, you would move the Garrigues page to something like Garrigues, Spain and then move the Garrigues (disambiguation) page to Garrigues. None of this should be done, however, without posting to the talk page of both articles telling editors what you suggest doing. Only after a full discussion or, at least, providing ample opportunity for discussion, should you attempt such a move. In general, the principle is that the base name should be at the page that is most likely to be searched for. If most people entering Garrigues want the Spanish county, that should be the default but there should be a prominent  at the top... — Dave (Talk | contribs) 15:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garrigues (disambiguation) 
Talk:2004 Pittsburgh Steelers season

message: In Week 8, the Steelers beat the Patriots 34-20, not 34-10. I'd change it, but I don't have the box score.74.219.149.67 (talk) 22:35, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Deliverator

message: I have turned this page into a redirect for the following reasons: I think that this piece of the Snow Crash universe is completely non-notable in its own right, not to mention that it needs heavy copyediting, and has no sources. If anyone contests this, please feel free to revert it and we'll discuss. -FrankTobia (talk) 00:30, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to [[Snow Crash]]
Talk:List of fictitious stories in Romance of the Three Kingdoms

message: for this extremely famous novel,  its differences from the history of the period which in most respects it follows very closely--is quite possibly encyclopedic, and quite possibly sufficient for a separate article. The topic seems to be referenced. Probably the title could be clarified a little. 
I'll bring it to the attention of the relevant workgroups. DGG (talk) 00:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

message: About the name of the list, I changed it from 'fake' to 'fictitous', since I think 'fake' sounds like 'lies'. Well, there are dozens of adjectives that can be used like: false, fake, untrue; but 'fictitious' is more used for novels and literature in general. Armando.Otalk • Ev 02:38, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Other possitbilites: non0historical, ahistoric, Differences between history and the novel. DGG (talk) 04:55, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Even "fictitious" is contentious. These are just stories that weren't included in the official court histories. There's no concrete evidence whatsoever that they are false, and likewise no evidence to prove that the official records are true. I will change it to "apocryphal" (meaning: of doubtful authenticity, although widely circulated as being true.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natnair (talk • contribs) 20:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not only are these stories not included in court histories, these are stories from a fictional novel from a thousand years after the events it depicts. That makes it fictitious. _dk (talk) 02:17, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the list 

message: I can't say anything about the accuracy of the content, but I have fixed up the writing.  Maybe the cleanup template can be taken off. --Denise from the Cosby Show (talk) 01:23, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: That's got to be a fictitious account?! Imagine Reason (talk) 19:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zhuge Liang's maze 

message: This must be an incomplete list, as the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is an extremely long novel. Perhaps something like "Since it is a popular novel, meant to entertain, Many of the stories in Romance of the Three Kingdoms are fictitious, and what follows is an incomplete list of the more important fictitious stories." should be introduced to the top of the page? Otherwise a reader may think that if a story is not listed here, it must by default, be true.
lk (talk) 07:12, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note that it is an incomplete list of fictitious stories
Talk:Ao Baptist Arogo Mungdang

message: Note:  Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Puducherry or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:08, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Nagaland Addition
Talk:Second Prodi government

message: Hi, i edited this page because the Prodi presidence end on 2 marzo 2007, because there was not a majoranche (sorry for english) --81.74.187.142 (talk) 19:47, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:François Thurot

message: This one's going to take a bit of work. The first version is cobbled together from sources which frankly contradict each other in many respects; I hope that when I get time to delve more closely into the primary sources I'll be able to figure out which secondary sources are the most reliable. Either way, I'll attach some sort of references to the article over the next few days. David Trochos (talk) 00:42, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure enough, it has taken a bit of work, and I'm still not happy. In particular, if anybody has access to Durand's fictitious 1760 biography "Genuine and Curious Memoirs of the Famous Captain Thurot", it would be useful if they could identify stories which seem to have originated there and appear in this article. BTW I've deliberately made the article very detailed, in the hope that some bits can be removed as fictitious. David Trochos (talk) 00:59, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: PS If nobody beats me to it (and I ain't hurrying) I'll add a few dozen more Wikilinks later. David Trochos (talk) 01:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  In their book Captain Francois Thurot by Young, G.V.C. and Foster, Caroline, Mansk Svenska Pub.Co. 1986 they say that the background details are very obscure.  ClemMcGann (talk) 19:51, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Baptist successionism

message: What is the evidence for and against this theory? In particular, why have scholars moved away from it? 124.190.106.151 (talk) 06:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Carroll's work is truth of the true church. The Roman church goes back only to 350a.d. The Church that Jesus built Matt. 16:18 was built on Him, the Chief Cornerstone. Eph.2: 19 "Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God; 20 And are built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone;" Peter WAS NEVER in Rome at any time and still Rome honors Peter as a Pope. Peter is [small stones..petros] and Christ is [a large rock..petra; so who is the first church built upon-CHRIST of course. "The gates of hell shall not prevail against it."--The church, bc Christ built it. Hell is not scared of Peter, so the Roman church would not stand against the gates of hell--TRUTH. RonGJohnson (talk) 21:59, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

text: The Catholic Church according to John is the great whore of Babylon. Have you methodically studied the history of the church? I wrote a 450 pager on which church did Jesus build-Matt. 16:18 many years ago, as I took apart many denominational anti-christian churches. Jesus' church IS NOT a denominational church [..period..]. Study sir, study this out please!! 47.225.174.30 (talk) 11:46, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence? 

message: With this edit, I reinstated several edits I made around 20 hours ago for the reasons explained in the edit summary. An IP had reverted without explanation. An IP (probably the same person) obviously thinks much of what I had previsouly removed for various reasons some time ago--as explained in those ESs, mostly OR and POV/UNDUE--should be brought back having wholesale reverted to a year-old version several times, even removing categories and interwikilinks. I disagree with those reversions, but I have left all but the worst of it, formatted it more appropriately, and tagged some of it. If anyone has thoughts, please let everyone know here. Novaseminary (talk) 15:27, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP reversions
Talk:Horatia Nelson

message: I don't mean to sound brusque, but the current article uses very long sentences, with many auxiliary clauses. It is quite confusing - sometimes I'm not even sure what meaning is intended. You may want to re-write to clarify. Try Wikipedia:WikiProject League of Copyeditors if you need some help. -- 21:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy Editing 

message: How could the child be both one week old and born "six weeks earlier" as the first paragraph of the Early Life section states? This doesn't make sense. 18.173.1.125 (talk) 16:05, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Life 

message: Why is this significant enough to be included? "The ancestry line can be traced to Millie Anne Fenning, wife to the first cousin of American journalist and author Hunter S. Thompson". Horatia had ten children two centuries ago, she must have numerous descendants now; why name any of them unless they're famous in their own right or connected to the Navy? 95.93.88.23 (talk) 13:34, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry Line Traced To... 

message: In the first section of the article it states "Though Horatia soon learnt of her real father...", implying soon after Nelson's death in 1805, later on it states "Horatia only realised she was Lord Nelson's biological daughter in 1845". Which is it?
Kenwyn74 (talk) 17:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovering her real father 

message: The Complete Peerage by G. E. Cockayne, edited by H. Arthur Doubleday and Lord Howard de Walden, vol.ix, (London, 1936, p.463n) stated that she was born on 29th October 1800, and baptised at St.Marylebone, London, 13th May 1803. 2A00:23C4:B63A:1800:5CE0:830D:C403:E950 (talk) 08:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Il Silenzio (song)

message: Thanks go to User:Melly42 for her diligent correction of my errors in the article and for providing legitimate references. -The Gnome (talk) 13:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: In POLAND this melody is now (2010) funeral melody. It became funaral melody after 1990, when became funeral melody for elites and big criminalist. 
Usually trampeter playing melody on cementary, in distance from grave, after ceremony (church, ecclesial ceremony), when people are around the grave. It is in Rosso interpretation. It is new practice. For this time was no music on Polish cementary, exept big funeral with orchestra.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.17.180.134 (talk) 09:49, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funeral melody in Poland 

message: There needs to be some reference here to the piece's performance on the Dutch Top 40 charts, where the sales and airplay of three versions by different artists (Nini Rosso, Heinz Schachtner and Willy Schobben) were combined to obtain a chart position.  Skinsmoke (talk) 12:00, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch chart success 

message: I have removed a paragraph from Il Silenzio (song) and Operation Market Garden because of possible copyright violation. This paragraph seems to be originally added to these articles in this and this edit in 2014. I was unable to find (using a web search) the original source, but this content has been around the Internet at least since 2010 and it's clear that this removed paragraph was copy pasted from unknown source (maybe from this?) Politrukki (talk) 14:48, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright violation 
Talk:Tributary (ballet)

message: The Wikipedia Manual of Style / Dates and numbers to the contrary, it is incorrect to write, "Friday, September 16, 2011." When the day of the week preceeds a date the use of cardinal numbering is not an option. Written language in the West records spoken language (and this is not a case of of the chicken or the egg.) — Robert Greer (talk) 12:03, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ordinal numbering
Talk:Symphony No. 1 (ballet)

message: How should the name of the composer of the music for “Serenade” be spelled? Most Westerners now spell it Tchaikovsky, but City Ballet took up, during Balanchine’s lifetime, the spelling Tschaikovsky. Why? Because that’s how the composer spelled it when he was in New York in 1891. (My thanks to the reader who sent me a copy of his Carnegie Hall autograph from the Pierpont Morgan Library.) 
:NY Times article by Alastair Macaulay, June 1, 2007
=== See also === 
* Official website Carnegie Hall
::— Robert Greer (talk) 20:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tschaikovsky vs. Tchaikovsky 

message: * Official website Carnegie Hall
::— Robert Greer (talk) 20:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  See also
Talk:Fault block

message: Do you have Wikipidea in Spanish?
:Yes. Had you not vandalised the article, I'd have provided a link. However, you're on your own. Argyriou (talk) 01:06, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish Wikipedia

message: The result of the discussion was merge. --Joshua Issac (talk) 18:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - the subject matter seems virtually identical. Mikenorton (talk) 16:31, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Don Fairfield

message: Finding information for this golfer bio was more difficult than average. A lot is still needed to make the article more complete-
*Date of birth
*Place of birth; place where he grew up
*Information about amateur career: development, college, tournament wins, etc.
*Information on where he lives and lived
*Military service (if any)
*More information on his regular years career
*More information on his senior career
*Club pro work Casey Country Club Casey,Illinois
*Awards and honors
Two small clues: He may have been living in Palm Springs, CA in 1967. He may have hailed from Jacksonville, Illinois. (The sources were not conclusive enough to put this in the article.)--Hokeman (talk) 03:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information hard to come by this time 
Talk:List of Futurama guest stars

message: The article currently lists every episode of Futurama however many of them did not have guest stars. Would it be appropriate to remove those episodes which do not have guest stars? They do not seem to add much to the article's subject. Stardust8212 01:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, do that. Also, given the recent mass-AFD-ing of Futurama articles, I suggest moving this to List of Futurama cast members, adding the regular cast at the top and who they voice. I also recommend referencing as many appearances to third-party sources as possible. IIRC the "Martyn and Wood" book the people at WP:SIMPSONS frequently use has a short Futurama appendix that can be used to reference those who appeared in the first season. The TV Guide website likely has individual appearances listed for other episodes. Brad 14:57, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems reasonable, I didn't create the page but I'm working on the references now, I might try to track down that book some time. I'll leave the move for a bit to see if anyone else responds but I'm not against it if someone else wants to be Bold. Stardust8212 15:49, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List all episodes? 

message: Kath Soucie and Frank Welker are both credited as guest stars whenever they appear on the show, and whilst they've appeared in a lot of episodes, it's not enough for them to be considered part of the show's main cast. They're not listed on the show's main page's cast list either so should they be added to this list despite not really being celebrities and the fact that they appear in so many episodes each?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omega cyber turnip (talk • contribs) 23:40, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  At what point is someone considered a guest star? 
Talk:New Baptist Covenant

message: The section Followup meeting—January 2007 uses the terms moderate and conservative in the same way as it is/was used in the Southern Baptist Convention takeover/resurgence controversy.  This meeting includes many participant (possibly a majority) who have no connection with this controversy and therefore really do not fall within this use of moderate and conservative.  Several of the groups and denominations participating may well be as or more conservative than the SBC.  Calling the General Association of General Baptists, a participant, less conservative than the SBC is probably a mistake.
Jleeper (talk) 01:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:David Martin Mennonites

message: Perhaps it should be mentioned that services are conducted in German.. 
Also, is this the group that wears ties? If so, it might be worth mentioning. 75.142.145.104 (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  German worship & ties ... 

message: They are reports that now the are called "Independent Old Order Mennonite Church". Is there anybody who can confirm this? -Tuncker (talk) 20:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Name?
Talk:System Development Corporation

message: Updated first section to expand the timeline between the creation of Unisys and the formation of Paramax. Alanmoll (talk) 21:16, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Fixed year sold to Burroughs. Said 1985; fixed 1980. This is according to Dan Faigin's SDC page in "cahighways.org", which is listed in External links. This also fits my personal recollection as an SDC employee at the time of the sale. RocketSci (talk) 04:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon further discussion with former employees, one said the sale to Burroughs was Jan 1, 1981, as published in the "SDC Bulletin" when it happened. Others hired in 1981 believe that date is correct. In his earlier search, Dan Faigin tried to find the date, but 1980 was as close as he could come at the time; he joined a few years later. RocketSci (talk) 23:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Ownership

message: From https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/4083735
: SDF was created in 1969 as a non-profit funding organization during the transition of the System Development Corporation (SDC) to for-profit status. The SDF Board of Trustees gave its initial grants to non-profit organizations, particularly Cal Tech, U.C. Berkeley, The Rand Corporation, and Stanford University. They backed research primarily in information sciences and the human-machine interface, the areas of expertise of SDC. In the first year SDF funded over $11 million in research; in the next five years it committed itself to $25 million. Recognizing it would terminate its operation in June 1988, funding was stopped for new projects in 1984. In the remaining years they continued to support work already underway. Jim Bowery (talk) 21:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to System Development Foundation?
Talk:Wau, South Sudan

message: I have removed the following text from the overview/history section:
:But the indigenous people of wau are indeed the fertit who include the golo,ndogo,balanda qureysh and other small tribes.The jur people also known as the luo migrated to wau in the  early 20th century,while the dinka came from their respective towns to settle their as it was a trading center which had been established by the arabs who also came from the north,as to whoever owns the town has been in dispute indeed but this is because the tribes that migrated to wau increased more rapidly in population hence outnumbering the fertit,but it is with no doubt indeed a fertit town.
This appears to contradict the given quotation by Burr and Collins, as well as having the characteristics of an unsourced contribution.  Any editor is, of course, free to re-add with appropriate references.  Thanks, BanyanTree 02:57, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal 