Talk:Ted Landsmark

message: The article linked at the bottom (http://www.thehistorymakers.com/biography/biography.asp?bioindex=569) says "The subject of a famous 1976 Pulitzer Prize-winning photograph..."  This article has 1977. Which is it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.174.177.138 (talk) 20:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pulitzer Prize Date? 

message: The image :Image:Soiling of Old Glory.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:46, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Soiling of Old Glory.jpg

message: He seems to have had more than one name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.25.65.26 (talk) 14:51, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More 

message: Isn't saying "appears to weaponize the flag" a little ridiculous? The man was photographed mid-swing stabbing a man. He doesn't appear to, he's very clearly doing so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:196:4801:47D0:D9AA:7B77:3E2F:9B89 (talk) 12:46, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  appears to 

message: , I remove the following references as they were not in the correct place. References are used to source a claim in the prose, not listed in the reference section itself. Feel free to ask for more help. -Reagle (talk) 16:12, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed references 

message: Weigers.g, overall I think your additions to the page provide really important information! I made a few changes to the wording of the first sentence of the “Aftermath of The Soiling of Old Glory” section for clarity and added a link to the page for Mayor Flynn near the end of the section. Beyond that, my suggestions to move it toward “perfect article” status would be to 1) try to incorporate some images into the page if you can find any. It might also be interesting to see if there are any video or audio clips of him talking about the incident that would be available for use. I don’t know if there will be anything that isn’t copyrighted, but it can’t hurt to look. 2) It might also be helpful to further explain “public ire” in the “Aftermath” section. Were there articles written about it at the time? Did it spark any pro-busing actions? 3) I think the phrase “anti-busing supporters” is a bit confusing. Having anti and supporters in the same phrase makes it a bit unclear what their position was. It might be more clear to say anti-busing protesters or something along those lines to make it more obvious that they were fighting against busing. Overall, I think you have a really great start and just a few changes can make the article even better! -Lavsam (talk) 03:41, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Feedback