Talk:BRST formalism

message: This article is both extremely technical and utterly confusing. Bodera 21:33, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this article needs a total re-write. linas 00:43, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a draft of a new exposition at BRST Quantization.  I'm not a professional theoretical physicist, so it may contain howlers; but I'm at least attempting to make connections to functional quantization and differential geometry on fiber bundles.  Michael K. Edwards 20:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled section 

message: Cleanup Co-ordination	Cleanup Co-ordination
                     	This article has recently been tagged as requiring cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards.
The article may have been flagged as needing cleanup because it has been suggested that:
*the article needs formatting, proofreading, or rephrasing in comprehensible English. 
*the article has multiple overlapping problems. 
*the article is very short and might need expanding, removal or merging with a broader article
For a full list of possible problems see Wikipedia:Manual of Style.
As part of the cleanup process, the automated bot PocKleanBot has generated this notice as a focus of cleanup efforts, and also contacted several contributing editors of the article to bring their attention to the problem. You should use this section to discuss possible resolution of the problem and achieve consensus for action. Only when there is a consensus that the article is now cleaned up should you then de-list it by deleting the cleanup tag from the article, this causes the article to drop off the monthly cleanup-needed list page.
===Discussion===
I believe this article must be merged with BRST Quantization. The title "BRST formalism" would be appropriate to represent its universal nature, however the article in BRST Quantization is much more well written. I suggest that we should replace the contents of "BRST formalism" article with the contents of "BRST quantization" and redirect the "BRST Quantization" to here. 
Hwasungmars 20:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Cleanup Co-Ordination Point 

message: I believe this article must be merged with BRST Quantization. The title "BRST formalism" would be appropriate to represent its universal nature, however the article in BRST Quantization is much more well written. I suggest that we should replace the contents of "BRST formalism" article with the contents of "BRST quantization" and redirect the "BRST Quantization" to here. 
Hwasungmars 20:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Dear everyone, this article is confusing. Why doesn't someone start from the scratch? Or more precisely from the oldest version of this file I wrote? It seems to me that whatever was added later is either confusing, irrelevant, or downright nonsense. I would recommend the 1st version instead of the present one. --Lumidek 12:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: {Which antiderivation is it? Is it the Lie Algebra acting on B AND b?} —Preceding unsigned comment added by YouRang? (talk • contribs) 
:I found the above comment added to the article.  I've moved it here. Michael Slone (talk) 17:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment moved from article