lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:In His Image

message: Hi, I am an administrator, Xinyu, and I got a report from ProfesorPaul, about how you've been, "vandalizing" EVERY SINGLE EPISODE OF The Twilight Zone. Discuss your intentions, what you have editted, fixed up, and under what pretext you have for doing so. I need you to tell me all the information you can get, and I promise both you and ProfessorPaul, this problem would be negotiable, once the facts has been laid bare, and then I'll see that NPOV, justice, and peace would be restored on this article. Thank you, please reply on my user TALK page. Thank you. --Lord X 01:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 216.244.12.76 I need to talk to you

message: Hi there,
Wanted to suggest changing the image (and its caption) used in the sidebar -- it rather spoils the plot of this episode. Please let me know if I can help.
:I'd like to get a less spoiler-driven image for this article, too. I'll have a look around the net to see if I can find a good one.--Martin IIIa (talk) 19:29, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't have much luck. All the images I found were either equally spoiler-laden or too nondescript for identification purposes. I'll have to see if I can figure out how to get a screenshot from my own DVD copy. In the meantime, I changed the caption to remove the spoiler - which is inaccurate, to boot, since Alan doesn't learn he's a robot until later. There were other possible explanations for his having robotics inside his arm.--Martin IIIa (talk) 23:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: @Martin IIIa pity this is still here in 2022!! 86.19.86.233 (talk) 19:58, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  consider changing this episode's still image (screen grab) and caption -- potential spoiler
Talk:Surface of Eceon

message: This article lacks any assertion of notability. The only external sources are written by people directly involved with the group or what appears to be a blog. Given the information in the article currently there is no reason to believe that most of it isn't original research. Please read the notability guidelines for music and consider adding published, third-party sources to the article. Zytsef (talk) 01:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:The Thirty-Fathom Grave

message: Hi, I am an administrator, Xinyu, and I got a report from ProfesorPaul, about how you've been, "vandalizing" EVERY SINGLE EPISODE OF The Twilight Zone. Discuss your intentions, what you have editted, fixed up, and under what pretext you have for doing so. I need you to tell me all the information you can get, and I promise both you and ProfessorPaul, this problem would be negotiable, once the facts has been laid bare, and then I'll see that NPOV, justice, and peace would be restored on this article. Thank you, please reply on my user TALK page. Thank you. --Lord X 01:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 216.244.12.76 I need to talk to you

message: In the Errors section, the final statements are "The doctor of the ship is also depicted as a Navy Chief. This may appear to be in error, in that enlisted sailors only qualify for the Corpsman rating. Independent duty corpsmen, however, are often addressed as "doc." " First, is there a reference for this?Second, it sounds like there is a confusion between the similar words "rating" and "rate" (the first is the job [eg. a corpsman], while the latter is the hierarchical position [eg. chief petty officer]).Third, a chief in the Navy is an enlisted sailor, so I'm not sure why the statement seems to imply that they are not.Fourth, "independent duty corpsman" is a qualification available (through additional schooling) to corpsmen of ranks 2nd Class (E-5) and above (which obviously would include chiefs [E-7]).Fifth, these statement seem to try to explain the error as not being an error (the choice of words seem to set up a resolution to the error ["This may appear to be an error", as the main example]), but I don't see a resolution to the setup.Anecdotally, our "doc" on the destroyer that I was on was a chief, so nothing seemed out of the ordinary while I watched this TZ episode (and I was paying extra attention due to how accurately things were depicted, even calling out what orders would be given next and the replies before they were given — someone involved in the making of this episode obviously had been in the Navy; much more than I would have expected from the writer Rod Serling [an Army boy]).— al-Shimoni (talk) 23:34, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed that section - while doing other clean up. That was added years ago, but that kind of section should never have been added without any refs. --Musdan77 (talk) 01:20, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing statement 

message: There's no hyphen in the title, as shown on the screen (beginning and end). --Walor (talk) 05:35, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: No hyphen
Talk:Valley of the Shadow

message: Hi, I am an administrator, Xinyu, and I got a report from ProfesorPaul, about how you've been, "vandalizing" EVERY SINGLE EPISODE OF The Twilight Zone. Discuss your intentions, what you have editted, fixed up, and under what pretext you have for doing so. I need you to tell me all the information you can get, and I promise both you and ProfessorPaul, this problem would be negotiable, once the facts has been laid bare, and then I'll see that NPOV, justice, and peace would be restored on this article. Thank you, please reply on my user TALK page. Thank you. --Lord X 01:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 216.244.12.76 I need to talk to you
Talk:He's Alive

message: Hi, I am an administrator, Xinyu, and I got a report from ProfesorPaul, about how you've been, "vandalizing" EVERY SINGLE EPISODE OF The Twilight Zone. Discuss your intentions, what you have editted, fixed up, and under what pretext you have for doing so. I need you to tell me all the information you can get, and I promise both you and ProfessorPaul, this problem would be negotiable, once the facts has been laid bare, and then I'll see that NPOV, justice, and peace would be restored on this article. Thank you, please reply on my user TALK page. Thank you. --Lord X 01:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 216.244.12.76 I need to talk to you

message: I just saw this episode for the first time yesterday, and it struck me that "Hitler" claimed, "I invented darkness!" Could this form actually be a malevolent spirit that takes on a host every so often, and it appears to Hopper's character as Hitler because that's the best way Hopper can understand him? Could this same figure have appeared to Hitler himself as Napoleon? To Napoleon as, say, Julius Caesar? To Caesar as Alexander the Great? And so on?
There are quite a few links, including actors and music composer Jerry Goldsmith, between The Twilight Zone and the original Star Trek series.  I wonder if this episode inspired the ST:TOS episode Wolf in the Fold, in which a malevolent spirit absorbs a host and kills women, one of the hosts being Jack the Ripper? James Blish wrote that ST:TOS episode.  Maybe this TZ episode inspired him.
This episode also brings to mind the Rolling Stones song "Sympathy for the Devil".
-- Pacholeknbnj, 3:10 PM EST, Jan. 2, 2007
: Interesting idea.  Serling seems to use the ghost to personify intolerance, specifically racial intolerance; there's nothing to suggest that Alexander, Caesar or Napoleon were bigots.  On the other hand, maybe he appeared to Andrew Jackson before the trail of tears, Torquemada before the Inquisition, etc...  Either way, I like you idea. 213.181.226.21 (talk) 12:40, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This Hitler as Jack the Ripper?

message: I recall reading that Serling received a lot of mail for this episode, criticising him for portraying Hitler as unsympathetic(!?).  If that can be sourced it seems notable for inclusion. -- Irrevenant [ talk ] 22:37, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viewer reaction? 

message: Some articles I have read indicate that Rod Serling and his staff received racist and anti-Semitic hate mail following the running of this episode. This would be worthy of inclusion. Dustin (talk) 17:13, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hate mail
Talk:The Beatles' First

message: I vote Yes.  Steelbeard1 11:56, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Consensus isn't usually established through voting, but I agree with you anyway. There is not some kind of "automatic notability" for Beatles records, particularly repackagings of already existing albums. Extraordinary Machine 23:09, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It took awhile but I removed the merge proposal as it was long decided to keep the article. Steelbeard1 02:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[The Early Tapes of The Beatles]] into this article?

message: This sentence is quite wrong : « The Beatles' First is the first British packaging of the 1962 German album by Tony Sheridan and The Beat Brothers called My Bonnie.» It is in fact the compilation of all the songs recorded with Sheridan by the Beatles in Hamburg (plus 4 others). Sheridan's album includes 2 songs from this set but all others were recorded later. This article needs fixin'! Also, the title has an «!» at the end. JeanPaulGRingault (talk) 00:29, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the exclamation mark for now because there's no source. The album cover in the infobox has no exclamation mark. M.Clay1 (talk) 02:13, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The image of the album cover is the British 1967 version. The original 1964 German cover has an exclamation mark; the source would be the actual graphics but unfortunatly is not accessible in Wikipedia commons. Since I do not possess the know-how to decide if adding the image would constitute copyright infringment or not, I'll leave its upload to an helpful expert (any volunteers?). But I believe the title should be written as the German original release; I would go as far as renaming the page by adding the «!». My two cents... JeanPaulGRingault (talk) 15:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Since my comment went unanswered, I've put back the exclamation mark in its rightful place since it is clearly part of the artwork of the original german issue. I still think the page itself should be titled with the exclamation mark. JeanPaulGRingault (talk) 00:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created a facsimile of the original German artwork. Look for «The Beatles' First (German 1964 album).jpg» in WP Commons. JeanPaulGRingault (talk) 17:26, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong info
Talk:Massimo Taibi

message: Who would know when he moved to Man Utd and so on? Will try to find info but feel free to add. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yashiv (talk • contribs) 01:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs dates 

message: He definitely didn't have 6 goals for Man Utd, and I highly doubt he had 50 goals from the GK position for Piacenza.  Can someone fix this, or point me to a good resource for Italian player statistics and I will? - themodelcitizen (talk) 04:04, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: An anonymous IP added all the goal information in without quoting a source. As the goal count is obviously inflated and incorrect I have simply reverted their changes. --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 13:40, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Um, what?
Talk:The Lonely

message: This article could use some judicious editing. Sentences like "Alicia is capable of emotions, memory and has a lifespan comparable to a human" are non-grammatical and should really be cleaned up so that the page doesn't read like a teenager wrote it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.184.74.7 (talk) 04:39, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I think that's an exact quote from the dialogue. - kosboot (talk) 15:35, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing Needed

message: Hi, I am an administrator, Xinyu, and I got a report from ProfesorPaul, about how you've been, "vandalizing" EVERY SINGLE EPISODE OF The Twilight Zone. Discuss your intentions, what you have editted, fixed up, and under what pretext you have for doing so. I need you to tell me all the information you can get, and I promise both you and ProfessorPaul, this problem would be negotiable, once the facts has been laid bare, and then I'll see that NPOV, justice, and peace would be restored on this article. Thank you, please reply on my user TALK page. Thank you. --Lord X 01:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 216.244.12.76 I need to talk to you

message: I think I read somewhere that this was the first "regular" (i.e. non-pilot) episode of the series to be produced. Can anyone confirm this? It should be mentioned in the article if this is true. 23skidoo 07:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wasn't this this first episode produced?
Talk:Perchance to Dream (The Twilight Zone)

message: Hi, I am an administrator, Xinyu, and I got a report from ProfesorPaul, about how you've been, "vandalizing" EVERY SINGLE EPISODE OF The Twilight Zone. Discuss your intentions, what you have editted, fixed up, and under what pretext you have for doing so. I need you to tell me all the information you can get, and I promise both you and ProfessorPaul, this problem would be negotiable, once the facts has been laid bare, and then I'll see that NPOV, justice, and peace would be restored on this article. Thank you, please reply on my user TALK page. Thank you. --Lord X 01:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 216.244.12.76 I need to talk to you

message: I think a quote from the writer should not be called critical response. The quote itself is interesting of course, but it needs a different headline.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.74.22.50 (talk) 12:27, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The unofficial in-development style guide at Wikipedia:WikiProject The Twilight Zone says it should be "Episode notes".  I've made the change. Travisl 19:53, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Critical Response?

message: I don't know if this is important enough to go on the article (plus I don't know how to format it and what not), but the title "Perchance to Dream" is a quote from the "To be or not to be" speech in Hamlet. Bernlomnty (talk) 01:44, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already there. "The title of the episode, and the Beaumont-written short story that inspired it, is taken from Hamlet's 'to be or not to be' speech." travisl (talk) 18:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title - Allusion to Shakespeare
Talk:What You Need (The Twilight Zone)

message: Is the newspaper given to Fred the same newspaper read by Henry Bemis in the episode "Time Enough at Last"??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valis2374 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Tomorrow's Newspaper"

message: Hi, I am an administrator, Xinyu, and I got a report from ProfesorPaul, about how you've been, "vandalizing" EVERY SINGLE EPISODE OF The Twilight Zone. Discuss your intentions, what you have editted, fixed up, and under what pretext you have for doing so. I need you to tell me all the information you can get, and I promise both you and ProfessorPaul, this problem would be negotiable, once the facts has been laid bare, and then I'll see that NPOV, justice, and peace would be restored on this article. Thank you, please reply on my user TALK page. Thank you. --Lord X 01:36, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 216.244.12.76 I need to talk to you
Talk:Where Is Everybody?

message: The Trivia section repeats the section above it.  Someone should probably clean that up, I'm not sure if maybe the sections should be merged, or what.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.57.167.84 (talk) 21:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Cleanup 

message: The description of this episode sounds like exceptionally hard science fiction to me. I know what the intro is trying to say, but am unsure how to rephrase it. --User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 20:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No science fiction elements? 

message: In the last paragraph of the production section, there is an unreferenced contribution alluding to Ferris pulling out a movie ticket, thus giving the ending a science fiction vibe. I'm not sure of the merits of the information, since there has been no follow-up to source material. Besides, why would he have a movie ticket if there was no one at the theater to sell it to him? YY 09:59, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie Ticket
Talk:Mr. Denton on Doomsday

message: added the sentence 
Politically incorrect reference: In the opening narration, use of the word "drunk".
to the article.  I have two issues with that: 
# Is it politically incorrect to use the word "drunk" (as in the opening narration), but politically correct to say "alcoholic wreck" (as in our article)? Our article drunk does not mention this word in connection with political correctness.
# It is not clear to me if it is claimed that "drunk" is politically incorrect now (in 2016), or that it was politically incorrect in 1959. If we mention PC at all, the article should be more explicit. 
(I also think that if we start putting the label of "politically incorrect" on everything that is said and done in 1950s' movies, we would be very busy...)
--91.115.10.197 (talk) 01:13, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: "Politically incorrect" makes no sense in this context; I suspect that 173.81.62.91 has "politically incorrect" confused with "anachronistic". Even assuming this is the case, though, it is indeed far too trivial to merit inclusion in the article.--Martin IIIa (talk) 13:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  politically incorrect
Talk:Islamic flag

message: Support - I think that Islamic flags should be merged into Symbols of Islam. 77.98.117.4 (talk) 10:00, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Where's the source behind the history of the early monotone flags? Faro0485 (talk) 07:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: Just because iconography (I use the term loosely) employs pure geometric forms doesn't necessarily mean it's not a "symbol." In particular, Bangladesh's inclusion in the flags without symbols section may be questionable --152.3.129.137 (talk) 16:45, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geometric "symbols" 

message: If anyone down the road looks at the page view statistics and is puzzled by why the page usually averages around 100 views a day, but was viewed about 80,000 times today, you can thank Matt Drudge. --207.206.137.50 (talk) 05:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drudge effect 

message: Why is this so called flag listed in as an Islamic flag? You might as well add the  flag of the Ku Klux Klan to the Christian flags as well if you're gong to do this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.230.184.59 (talk) 23:13, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Six years later and it is still listed as a Muslim flag with an unlinked separate page called “jihadist flag”. It’s the same flag on both pages. It is suspiciously devoid of any attempt at disambiguation. Would be nice to learn more about why this apparent discrepancy exists. 2605:A601:AC9B:4B00:896F:884D:EA7:E775 (talk) 09:48, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Jihadist flags" 
Talk:Nessus (software)

message: It should be a comment about the nessus fork OpenVAS.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.203.33.247 (talk) 16:32, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OpenVAS 

message: The Limitations section of the article states:While Nessus, through community participation, has a very extensive list of known security vulnerabilities[...]I think this sentence could benefit from rewording.  As is, the casual reader's first impression is that Nessus itself has been found, through community efforts, to have a very extensive set of vulnerabilities.  I don't think that was the meaning, but I'll leave that to those who know more about the situation. – Wdfarmer (talk) 22:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vulnerabilities in what? 

message: What is the history of the name "Nessus"? Is it perhaps a reference to a character in Larry Niven's Known Space series? 12.51.248.245 (talk) 13:08, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of the product name
Talk:Bongo Comics

message: I removed some of the external links on this page since they weren't particularly useful. Anyone know if there is an official web site for Bongo comics? Scott 13:32, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Fixes problems with both pages. Duggy 1138 (talk) 13:52, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What problems? --TheLeftorium 13:48, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

text: *Oppose. While there is an overlap I don't see any reason for merging these two list. Bongo Comics is about more than just The Simpsons. --Maitch (talk) 00:29, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging The Simpsons Comics into Bongo 

message: The issues of Simpsons One-Shot Wonders are listed under both "All Series" and "One-Shot Publications" - surely it should be one or the other?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.78.6.38 (talk) 09:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simpsons One-Shot Wonders
Talk:Mobile ticketing

message: The mobile ticketing is intended for the any show oriented organizations for e.g.: film theatres, stadiums, concert halls…etc. For instance assume foot ball stadium has installed Mobile ticketing system then its works like this, A user who want to watch foot ball match will buy ticket online, upon receiving payment stadium sends the DATA MATRIX code (data matrix code is like the bar code which is encoded version of the ticket) to his mobile through SMS. Then he will come to stadium and wave his mobile before the cameras, after that the transit will open or stops him depending his DATA MTRIX code. --Kiran cheriyala 20 June 2006
:We also have another way, that is waiting for the solution! --202.78.224.101  23 July 2007
18092018 - Hugo Beunder
This part should be deleted:
The term can also refer to a method by which law enforcement agencies use in-car computers to create traffic citations in the field, then print a hard copy for the offender.
There is no reference at all on the internet of usage of the phrase mobile ticketing for traffic fines.
If there will be no reaction I will delete this text.  — Preceding 
unsigned comment added by HugoBeunder (talk • contribs) 12:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I will delete the part about supposed disadvantages. None of them make sense. e.g. Premium SMS has never been used in the process of mobile ticketing. Tickets were purchased over the internet via a ticketing website from the supplier directly. Forgery is more of a problem with paper tickets, mobile tickets can be encrypted and are virtually 100% save if a sound protection scheme is being implemented. Normally mobile tickets can be re-downloaded so risk of losing is in fact less then with paper tickets. Mobile Ticketing as such does not impede the selling of paper tickets. These arguments were valid in 2003 and more so now in 2018.--HugoBeunder on 20 September 2018
30-9-2018. I deleted the part about REDEMPTION. It did not make any sense. Some remark about off-line validation I will add somewhere in the article as this is important.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by HugoBeunder (talk • contribs) 13:54, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article is in an exceptionally poor state. Additionally, the major recent editor, Hugo, talks about working for a company which now appears SIX times in the article. It needs serious re-writing but not by people promoting their own company!!! Rayman60 (talk) 22:12, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with article
Talk:Zombies! Aliens! Vampires! Dinosaurs!

message: Hey do you know if the japanese release has actually been released yet?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mufffin man (talk • contribs) .
:The Japanese release has been out since September 6, 2006 on In-n-Out Records (Source: ). --HarryCane 18:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese release