lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Misery Loathes Company (Popular)

message: I at first tagged this and then realized that it seems to be an episode of a TV series I've never heard of. My mistake. Zelse81 03:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You did fine, it was a copyright violation, so I just removed the text. It was copied word for word from tv.com episode summaries. Ariel♥Gold 03:30, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: August 2007
Talk:Nothofagus alpina

message: How can wood be "light heavy"? Light coloured and heavy in weight maybe, but what does this article really mean? ϢereSpielChequers 23:23, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: light heavy?

message: Rauli casks were once widely used in Chile, but if they weren't kept very clean, they imparted a rather dirty, wet-doggy flavour to the wines. They've now all but disappeared from most Chilean cellars, but here's proof that rauli wasn't totally a bad thing.  This is a rather interesting insight on rauli barrel wines. Komitsuki (talk) 06:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good old-fashioned Chilean wine 
Talk:South Carolina Democratic Party

message: I'm considering removing the Presidential election results section as I question the relevance of it for this article. Any thoughts as to why it should remain? Bob Aubin (talk) 02:39, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: POTUS Election results

message: Seriously people, if you're going to vandalize the page, be clever about it at the very least. It makes it more fun to revert it. Kearby 04:24, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've gone and spoiled all the fun. I just protected the article. —C.Fred (talk) 04:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just the same, the controversies need to be in the article. Wikilost 04:49, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ugh, I'm so torn. i wish they'd let Stephen run but... Must .... Not... Vandalize.... Wikilost 05:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Vandalism
Talk:Ochanostachys amentacea

message: The genus Ochanostachys is monotypic so this page should be moved  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tr3ndyBEAR (talk • contribs) 07:04, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no information here that was not more correctly at the genus article, so I just made it a redirect. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:09, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Synergism

message: VERY one-sided. 151.185.60.250 (talk) 00:52, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made a first attempt to remedy the second of the above complaints.  I disagree with the other, since the Arminian (and Wesleyan) view is given more space than the Calvinist critique of it.  Esoglou (talk) 14:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I agree with the above poster. I've flagged this article for NPOV checking. The issues are, as I can see them:
* Too much emphasis on Calvinist critique of Arminian theology, with no information about how the Arminians view the critiqued ideas
* No emphasis at all on the "important part" synergy plays in Eastern Orthodox theology, despite having a sentence about it
Could most of this article be merged into another article on Calvinism?
64.80.108.55 (talk) 18:54, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made a first attempt to remedy the second of the above complaints.  I disagree with the other, since the Arminian (and Wesleyan) view is given more space than the Calvinist critique of it.  Esoglou (talk) 14:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Theological POV
Talk:Ocotea foetens

message: For ease of reference: it seems premature to move this page to Agathophyllum persoonianum Blume as The Plant List indicates. It cites Tropicos as the source, but the authority names given there are different, (Aiton) Benth. & Hook. f.. Wikipedia currently has no pages for the genus Agathophyllum, all of the species of which in The Plant List are listed as synonyms or unresolved (including A. persoonianum as unresolved). Sminthopsis84 (talk) 15:18, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not (yet) a synonym
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Gagueci

message: From Interiot's editcounter:
:Username	Gagueci
:Total edits	200
:User groups	user
:Image uploads	0 (0 cur, 0 old) (browse)
:Distinct pages edited	52
:Edits/page (avg)	3.85
:Avg edits/day	0.01
:Deleted edits	0
:First edit	2006/05/09 23:53:54
:Edits by namespace 	Namespace	Edits
:(Main)	108
:Talk	63
:User	11
:User talk	11
:Wikipedia	4
:Image talk	3
:~Kylu (u|t)  03:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Editcountitis
Talk:Ocotea porosa

message: Isn't this particular species also referred to as the Ipe? Koalorka (talk) 18:01, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Blink (Plumb album)

message: This page is a combination of two albums, both titled "Blink", but they have nothing to do with each other. The page states that it is a Plumb album, but all of the details are about the Revive album. This needs to be changed to a Revive page, and another page for Plumb's REAL album created.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.232.119.172 (talk) 19:15, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Different Bands
Talk:Opuntia echios

message: The current citations (such as the one at IUCN) are inactive, and it appears that the internet archive doesn't have a snapshot saved for the Opuntia echios article. Definitely need new sources or to find another archive. Deku link (talk) 22:58, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The species very well covered in , but I haven't checked the detail in the article against the book (which I have a copy of). I don't have time to work on this now, but will put it on my to-do list if no-one else fixes it first. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that reliable sources, including the IUCN, have now merged this species into Opuntia galapageia. Both articles need fixing. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:41, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixes were made. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:47, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need new citations
Talk:Opuntia galapageia

message: According to , there are a few synonyms for the species Opuntia galapageia Hensl.:
*Opuntia helleri K.Schum
*Opuntia insularis Stewart
*Opuntia megasperma J.T.Howell
*Opuntia myriacantha F.A.C.Weber
*Opuntia saxicola J.T.Howell 
If this is true, this fucks up some wiki pages. As you see, the problem is, the links above, with exception of O. myriacantha all a seperate wiki pages. Also the Opuntia wiki page is affected by treating the synonyms as if they were seperate species. Can someone please look into this? --84.159.162.20 (talk) 19:43, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: And there are more now. I am looking into this. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have turned all the above into redirects here, at least for the present. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonyms
Talk:Opuntia megasperma

message: According to , Opuntia megasperma J.T.Howell is a synonym for Opuntia galapageia Hensl. This stub article is therefore is completely redundant and should be deleted. Maybe a list of synonyms should be added to the Opuntia galapageia Hensl. page to avoid appearing this (and other) synonms pages again. --84.159.162.20 (talk) 19:24, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected (somewhat belatedly!). Peter coxhead (talk) 09:04, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for deletion
Talk:Opuntia saxicola

message: According to , Opuntia saxicola is a synonym for Opuntia galapageia. Therefore this article is completely redundant and should be deleted or (maybe better) made into a redirect. --84.159.162.20 (talk) 19:14, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected (somewhat belatedly!). Peter coxhead (talk) 09:02, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for deletion
Talk:Oreopanax ecuadorensis

message: How is it that this plant is of "least concern," but at the same time "threatened by habitat loss"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.147.236.195 (talk) 17:47, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Threatened by habitat loss," but "least concern"? 
Talk:Monte Carlo (biscuit)

message: The Ingredients section reads like adverting copy taken from the company, and spoiler alert, it is. Much of the text, even despite apparent edits to improve it, is recognisable as coming from the company's FAQ page cited as a source.
NB: The page it is taken from is no longer accessible from the link, but is using the archive.org's Wayback Machine: http://web.archive.org/web/20130102171247/http://www.arnotts.com.au/faq.aspx
Arnott's FAQ page: "Arnott's identified trans fatty acids (TFAs) as an issue of importance more than 10 years ago and took action then to significantly reduce the level of TFAs in their biscuits by replacing partially hydrogenated animal fats with vegetable oils."
Wikipedia page: "Arnott's identified trans fatty acids as an important issue over a decade ago.[when?] They then took action to reduce the level of TFAs in their biscuits. They replaced the partially hydrogenated animal fats with vegetable oils."
Arnott's FAQ page: "MSG is naturally present in many foods. If any of our products contain added MSG, this would be listed as 'flavour enhancer (621)' in the ingredient list on the label."
Wikipedia page: "Monosodium glutamate (MSG) is naturally present in many foods. Monte Carlo products contain added MSG and labels them as flavour enhancers."
Arnott's FAQ page: "Arnott's uses sea salt, which is made in South Australia by evaporating seawater."
Wikipedia page: "Arnott's uses sea salt derived from South Australia's evaporating seawater."
Arnott's FAQ page: "Lecithin, which is present in Monte Carlo biscuits, comes from soybeans and is a very common emulsifier in many foods."
Wikipedia page: "It's derived from soybeans. Lecithin is a very common emulsifier in a wide range of foods."
I am removing the section, I don't believe the information it contains is established as being that notable or encyclopedic, nor that it is the kind of information people expect or want from a product page on Wikipedia.
...oh and as per the ingredients list found here: https://shop.coles.com.au/a/a-national/product/arnotts-biscuits-monte-carlo it doesn't seem like MSG is currently an added ingredient  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.151.30 (talk) 06:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ingredients section
Talk:Soft-tissue sarcoma

message: i would like to know how much time my dog my have to live she has a tumor the size of a soft ball on her hind quarter. the vet says it is to avasive to operate and has givin me pain meds for her. three months ago we were told it was just a ball of fat and not to worry. it has grown double since then, and she is having trouble walking
                                                              thanks kathy  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.103.148.125 (talk) 23:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sarcoma in dogs 

message: Wikipedia's external links policy and the specific guidelines for medicine-related articles do not permit the inclusion of external links to non-encyclopedic material, particularly including internet chat boards and e-mail discussion groups. Because I realize that most normal editors haven't spent much time with these policies, please let me provide specific information from the guidelines:
* This page, which applies to all articles in the entire encyclopedia, says that links "to social networking sites (such as MySpace or Fan sites), discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), USENET newsgroups or e-mail lists" are to be avoided.
* This page deprecates ""helpful" external links, such as forums, self-help groups and local charities."
* This medical-specific page reinforces the pan-Wiki rules, with a note that "All links must meet Wikipedia's external links guidelines, which in particular exclude discussion forums."
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while it may occasionally be useful to patients or their families, it is not an advertising opportunity for support groups.  Please do not re-insert links that do not conform to the standard rules.  Any editor, BTW, is welcome to read all of the rules and perform an "audit" in the remaining links.  Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: That link is not helpful. Probably it redirects because the linked article doesn't exist anymore on cancerconsultants.com.
A google on taxotere gemzar soft tissue sarcoma finds three published trials, probably the author of this wikipedia article meant to link to one of them.--Helenuh (talk) 12:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  ref 4 redirects to http://news.cancerconnect.com/ 

message: I'm taking away the section about "notable experts" as it lists only one person and doesn't really add anything of value (it's also very unusual to have paragraphs like that on Wikipedia). Feel free to reintroduce it in an expanded form if you disagree.
88.147.4.128 (talk) 16:10, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Expert
Talk:SAO (biscuit)

message: Anyone heard of the game Soggy SAO?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.94.54.14 (talk) 04:04, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Very well known, probably hard to find a reliable source to prove its notability. 110.175.54.182 (talk) 06:45, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Corrected the introduction year to 1904, per  and dozens of other advertisements appearing BEFORE 1906. Johnr_roberts 20:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrected the SAO introduction year
Talk:Gary Orfield

message: From this query, it appears that Proyecto Derechos Civiles was founded in 1996, so I reverted the edit that changed it to 1991. Is there overwhelming evidence that this was founded in 1991 somewhere?–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:42, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proyecto Derechos Civiles 

message: I moved this to draft space because most of the content is uncited, which is an issue for a Biography of a Living Person. Otherwise, it could have been nominated for deletion.–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:03, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Think it's ready to go back? --evrik (talk) 05:11, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved to draft
Talk:Aul

message: Are svaneti villages also called Auls? Tamokk 04:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Hey,
At first I want to say that Aul is a turkic and not a Slavic word,
The second thing wold be that no, Svanetian villages are not called Auls,
And third, Gunib is not the birthplace of Imam Shamil, he was born in Gymri (Gümri), Gunib is the place where he was captured.
please correct it.
thanks,
Sandro Shanidze,  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.117.43.248 (talk) 19:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: About Auls
Talk:2C-B-FLY

message: "The symmetrical aromatic benzodifuran derivatives tend to have the highest binding affinity at 5-HT2A, but the saturated benzodifuran derivatives have higher efficacy, while the saturated benzodipyran derivatives are more selective for 5-HT2C."
It's given here that saturated benzodifuran derivatives have reputedly a higher intrinsic activity than their corresponding aromatic counterparts. This information is wrong. In the article "Enantiospecific synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a series of super-potent, conformationally restricted 5-HT(2A/2C) receptor agonists" affinities and efficacies are given for both saturated and unsaturated derivatives. There is no constant relationship between aromaticity of furan rings and intrinsic activity. Clearly, Bromo-DragonFLY has a higher efficacy (93%) than DOB-Fly does (80%), but for some substituents at 8. position this relation is reversed.
Doubleffect~enwiki (talk) 19:13, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affinity and Efficacy of Furan and Dihydrofuran analogues 

message: Someone just changed the information under "Legality." 2C-B-Fly isn't completely different just because you add a furanyl ring system, you're just adding two methyl groups to join the 2,5-dimethoxy groups of 2C-B into a furanyl ring system. There's also no shared resonance along the "wings" with the benzene, so it's still just a complexely substituted 2,5-dimethoxyphenethylamine.
Andares (talk) 03:52, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Properties as analog
Talk:HMAS Kuru

message: I'd upgrade this to start, if someone can explain why it has the same name as the disease, kuru.Pustelnik (talk) 03:38, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume its and Australian Aboriginal word, and has no relation to the disease. -- saberwyn 01:17, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Class
Talk:Space form

message: The remark about Milnor's exotic spheres doesn't make any sense!  Obviously, they are not aspherical!  Are there any examples of fake smooth structures on compact aspherical manifolds?
Also, why does the statement of the space form conjecture speak of Riemannian manifolds?  The metric seems to have no bearing on the question.
This perplexes me as well. In other words, it would be nice if someone explains the relation between the space form conjecture and space forms. Oded (talk) 15:18, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Lizzie McDonald (Life with Derek)

message: I do not think that Lizzie is thirteen years old, as Jordan Todosey (who portrays her) is only twelve years old as I write this and she has stated on her official website that, aside from the parents, she is the only cast member who plays a character of the same age (as Michael Seater, Ashley Leggat, Daniel Magder, and Ariel Waller are all older than their characters).  Also, Lizzie, per my recollection, is regarded as being ten years old in the first season, which only began about two years ago as I write this, and the show is only now beginning its third season.  Therefore, I think it would be more fitting for Lizzie to be listed as twelve (or eleven) years old. Hallpriest9 (Talk | Archive) 04:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I don't know if they will use him again but dont u think we should mention her finally going out with Jamie in one episode.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.240.147.78 (talk) 00:05, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Boyfriend

message: Is there a reason the page was moved to "Elizabeth MacDonald"?  First off, I do not remember any episode in which Lizzie is referred to as Elizabeth (for all we know, Elizabeth is not her birth name at all).  Also, the last name would be "McDonald", which was made explicit in the episode "Grade A Cheater" in Season 3 (Casey says it to Derek). Hallpriest9 (Talk) 02:42, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved the page as the title overlapped articles about real people with this name. --NrDg 03:17, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: It is not my responsibility to attempt to find sources for trivial content. It is the responsibility of the person who wishes to return the content to provide the sources. MM 207.69.139.135 (talk) 01:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:BURDEN]]
Template talk:PRC provinces imagemap

message: Note. Smaller to larger image maps:
*Template:PRC provinces small imagemap/province list
*Template:PRC provinces small imagemap/45em
*Template:PRC provinces small imagemap 
*Template:PRC provinces imagemap 
*Template:PRC provinces big imagemap --Timeshifter (talk) 16:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Template talk:Dictionary of Australian Biography

message: See Template talk:ADB. -- Matthead  DisOuß   18:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ADB also a German biography 

message: The link the the index page at Project Gutenberg Australia is broken. Paul foord (talk) 07:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Dictionary of Australian Biography index not found at Project Gutenberg Australia
Talk:Red moon

message: For the record: I added a WTF tag because I was like 'WTF' when I read this article. But I clicked preview and eread what it says and I think it's something like that.
:I'm going to redirect this to the computer game. The association with eclipses will be obscure to most people. 2fort5r (talk) 18:01, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: WTF
Talk:The Tall Men (TV series)

message: I believe this article was misnamed from the beginning (understandably) and that the actual name of the series was "The Tall Man," to judge from all my online looking around (although I always thought it was "The Tall Men" myself).  I cut and pasted the article into "The Tall Man (TV series)" but I have no idea how to take this one down or what the procedure for that might be.  Skymasterson 04:18, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Closed-form formula

message: This seems a bit poor.  The first sentence is a general description of the topic, but the rest of the article is essentially an example, and doesn't add much insight into the topic for the uninitiated.  A more general explanation would be very helpful before proceeding to examples.
Refosk 04:20, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does the term 'closed-form formula' apply only to fixed income analysis? If not, I propose that this page be deleted. Finnancier 03:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: lead does not explain subject

message: The overwhelming majority of uses of the term "closed-form formula" are not about finance (or whatever this is) at all.  The page has now been redirected, and that's a great improvement. Michael Hardy (talk) 02:38, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected
Talk:Oxera

message: This article requires a substantial rework in light of the recent changes in accepted taxonomy. As a citizen scientist who does not have access to most of the online journals that (I assume) would be required for the task, I'm not confident in taking on this task myself and so I am putting this message out in the hope that someone else will. 
There is one journal that is freely available (and is possibly the most important one), i.e. https://academic.oup.com/botlinnean/article/179/4/693/2416543#84264415. 
Junglenut (talk) 07:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article revision required
Talk:Óc Eo

message: The text sats, under Columbus' search for Ciamba: "and sail through the strait separating Cattigara from the New World, into the Sinus Magnus to Malacca". Did they believe that Cattigara was on an island? For me it seams more logical to believe that Cattigara was part of the new world 193.10.63.101 (talk) 08:17, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Columbus' search for Ciamba 

message: Vietnamese historian Ha Van Tan has questioned whether the vestiges excavated at Oc Eo belonged to the Funan kingdom, in view of the complete lack of any Khmer records relating to a kingdom of this name. Does he doubt that Oc Eo exister, that the Funan kingdom existet or that Oc Eo belonged to the funan kingdom? Thanks in advance /markus 193.10.63.101 (talk) 09:55, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It said that he didn't think it was a political entity but just an economic and cultural entity.  The wikipedia page of Funan shows that the Cham already had their own country of Champa bordering Funan. Mon people and Khmer people are in the same group of people called the Mon-Khmer. And its speculated that the Funan were Khmer because the early Angkor kings traced their lineage to pre-Angkor royalty. Plus origin myth of the funan people are the same as the origin myth of the khmer people.Pwordisony (talk) 06:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ha Van Tan 

message: ốc is Viet for 'snail' - probably reference to a waterway or pond famous for this culinary delight.  ~~ Ian Ison  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.173.51.34 (talk) 08:58, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Chip Goodyear

message: A report in "The Australian" newspaper in 2007/Aug stated that CG is a regular bicycle commuter in Melbourne Feroshki 04:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled