lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Płoty

message: Ich erinnere mich, weil ich die technische Schule ging, dass die Farm untergebracht in eine neue Burg auf dem hinteren Teil des Parks und in ihm gibt es ein Gebäude ist es wahrscheinlich eine Kapelle ein paar Meter hinter ihr waren die Gräber der Familie und wurde ein eigenes Grab mit einem Holzkreuz, wurden die Briefe mit dem Wort gotischen Buchstaben, gravierten Bismarck begraben wurde nicht an den Namen erinnern, war sich über die Sowjetunion im Jahre 1944 erschossen  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.23.247.1 (talk) 18:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Wałcz

message: Kaschubian name has never been used for Wółcz. It's XX century invention. This is complete fallacy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.222.84.145 (talk) 23:04, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is also no reason to italicize former German names of now-Polish localities in the areas given to postwar Poland by the Potsdam Conference. In English, italics usually denote foreign (non-English) words for things or concepts, but not place names. Prior to 1945, the town was officially Deutsch Krone, not Deutsch Krone, and should not be italicized. Sca (talk) 13:43, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Improper Italicization
Talk:Barbara Henrickson

message: "Later in the season, Barb is shown struggling with her possible excommunication from the church and turns to her mother and sister for their help in sponsoring her in a sacrament ceremony."
That is not correct. In that episode she was trying to go to a temple for an endowment, not sacrament. She asked her mother and sister if one of them would loan her their recommend to enter the temple. Also there is no "sponsoring" for the sacrament or anything of that nature.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brothersteve (talk • contribs) 03:55, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Richard Woldendorp

message: !6 books and http://henrietta.liswa.wa.gov.au/search/X?SEARCH=richard+woldendorp&searchscope=1&Da=&Db=&p=&SORT=A - there might be some enthusiasm for csd - however it really tests the issues surrounding WP:Civility - please use the weapon for something you might know about User:JarrahTree 12:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: People sit on Special:Newpages hitting reload and watching great steaming piles of crap being posted onto Wikipedia by the minute. If you knew how much utter rubbish they tag for deletion, you would forgive the odd error. Hesperian 13:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Understand - have seen it myself I do not know how they keep their sanity personally - User:JarrahTree 13:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable

message: Repeated inserted assertions of his exhibitions and works without any sign of a single WP:RS in site is tedious...
then it gets topped off by being possibly living - JarrahTree 00:32, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsourced material
Talk:The Osbournes

message: This article was so disorganized, I did my best to organize the info. into sections 68.212.153.109 18:57, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was Boone's version of Crazy Train used as the theme for later seasons?  The original theme was performed by Lewis La Medica.  http://www.theprojekt.com/lewis.html
http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,235237,00.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JackieRipper (talk • contribs) 14:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Osbournes 

message: I think I heard Ozzie say that he'd "quit cigarettes and heroin six months ago" in an episode where their son had cigarettes.
Is there some backstory to this show?
I suspect that the stars had recently come out of rehab and were using the show to revitalize Ozzie's career by building up a new audience,
followed by live concerts on MTV that were part of the contract.
More power to them, I wasn't a fan before but am now!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 32.97.110.60 (talk) 19:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backstory? 

message: The article lists two different singers for the theme song.  Who was it?  --64.134.56.5 (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theme song
Talk:United Nations Operation in the Congo

message: Hi,
The 11th reference "Republic of Congo - ONUC Background". United Nations. 2001. Retrieved 14 February 2015. does not exist anymore. Just wanted to bring that to your attention.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thumbreon (talk • contribs) 18:53, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Thubmreon, I've fixed it using a link from Wayback Machine. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference doesn't exist anymore 

message: There were numerous cases of sexual misconduct by UN peacekeeping forces, especially in the Congo. This has been acknowledged by the UN itself (such as the letter of 24 March 2005 from the Secretary-General to the President of the General Assembly).
Is there a reason this topic is not mentioned here ? דןברקת (talk) 10:42, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: All the instances of sexual misconduct that I have heard about were during the mission from 1999 (MONUC, later MONUSCO from 2010, still in place). If you are indeed talking about that mission, please add data to MONUSCO#Criminal activity. This article is about the mission from 1960 to 1965. If you have information about allegations of misconduct 1960-65, please add them here if they are based on reliable sources. Buckshot06 (talk) 03:21, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegations of sexual misconduct - in the 1960s?
Talk:Lubawa

message: This edit  uses primary sources, which may be biased, for potentially controversial information. This violates the Wikipedia policy WP:PRIMARY.
The same edit uses a source, Handbuch der historischen Stätten, edited by the Nazi author Erich Weise and with contributions from other authors from Nazi Germany. Per WP:RS this is not a reliable source and should not be used in this or other articles.
Furthermore it looks like an effort is being made to obfuscate the nature of this source, by omitting the fact that Weise was the editor and instead only listing a few of the authors (like Kurt Forstreuter, another Nazi). On top of that the ISBN number of the book is being omitted. Note that previously the same editor included this information in his previous edits, but when concerns were raised about the nature of this source and Erich Weise, began omitting it. This suggests strongly that the editor in question is fully aware that this is a problematic source and is making bad faithed attempts to hide it.
Please do not restore this info without providing modern, reliable, secondary sources.Volunteer Marek 13:34, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:   Sources edited/written by Nazi authors, abuse of primary sources by User:Kaiser von Europa 
Talk:Nowe Miasto Lubawskie

message: This edit  uses primary sources, which may be biased, for potentially controversial information. This violates the Wikipedia policy WP:PRIMARY.
The same edit uses a source, Handbuch der historischen Stätten, edited by the Nazi author Erich Weise and with contributions from other authors from Nazi Germany. Per WP:RS this is not a reliable source and should not be used in this or other articles.
Furthermore it looks like an effort is being made to obfuscate the nature of this source, by omitting the fact that Weise was the editor and instead only listing a few of the authors (like Kurt Forstreuter, another Nazi). On top of that the ISBN number of the book is being omitted. Note that previously the same editor included this information in his previous edits, but when concerns were raised about the nature of this source and Erich Weise, began omitting it. This suggests strongly that the editor in question is fully aware that this is a problematic source and is making bad faithed attempts to hide it.
Please do not restore this info without providing modern, reliable, secondary sources.Volunteer Marek 13:32, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:   Sources edited/written by Nazi authors, abuse of primary sources by User:Kaiser von Europa 
Talk:Pasym

message: Every effort should be made to get western historians to work on these pages otherwise the Polish nationalists simply presnet us with a range of fictions. It is completely wrong on the English language Wikipedia to cite Polish books which only Poles can obtain and read. You might as well cite a comic book. This is a thorny subject that the admins of Wikipedia need to address as it is littered with ridiculous propaganda pages which bear little or no factual analysis, such as the Silesian Uprisings. Just a joke. In the UK our tertiary institutions refuse to permit Wikipedia to be used as a source and this kind of thing is one of the reasons.  2A00:23C4:B63A:1800:45F0:556F:74CB:971 (talk) 19:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Former German territories
Talk:AN/MPQ-64 Sentinel

message: this needs renamed to its proper nominclature. AN/mpq ect. 97.118.66.140 (talk) 22:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: rename

message: The tone of the article is very close to a marketing brochure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.248.161.32 (talk) 11:41, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral point of view? 
Talk:Hiroshi Kawashima

message: I think that the first edition of this is the translation from the Japanese version. However, this article has no information about the inheritance of the page history from that. Therefore, I strongly suspect that this is a GFDL violation. Moreover the Japanese version hadn't specified any source, and hasn't been a reliable information. Almost all the articles created by this user seem to have a same GFDL problem. Thanks. --Akira Kouchiyama 18:15, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly copyvio
Talk:Mogilno

message: I added information about German massacre during Second World War.--Molobo (talk) 20:39, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added on German massacre 

message: Volksdeutsche in Mogilno had Polish citizenship before the war. Later they rejected the citizenship declaring German nationality and committing crimes on Poles. Many Volksdeutsche run away to Germany in 1944/1945. Xx236 (talk) 10:55, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Volksdeutsche]]
Talk:Răzvan Fodor

message: --Alanmihai 13:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Strzelno

message: This section needs the attention of an historian for its lack of sources, its including material not really germane to the article, its excluding much relevant material, and for tone. 
Our understanding is that the Germanic influence in this region dated back to Catholic (northern) crusades by the Teutonic Knights in the 13th century, and per the Bromberg (Bydgoszcz) article here at Wikipedia—this being the administrative district where Strelno was found in the period until 1919—the population of the principle urban areas of that district were up to 80% German in 1910 (data for Bromberg), ranging downward in smaller communities and rural areas, giving an overall composition of approximately half and half, German and Polish speaking peoples at that time. Thus, while the population of Strelno was majority Polish in 1910, simply stating that does not capture the nature of the population and its dynamics at the time (and including census data from 1890 when later data are available does not likewise satisfy the demands of good scholarship).  
The political and ideological battles of the past should not the fuel any disagreement here. The article simply needs to reflect the actual (complicated) history of what was long known as "Prussia", beginning from the time of the aforementioned crusade.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:246:C700:558:D95D:DD5B:F5BA:CE94 (talk) 05:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, your assumption is incorrect, the area formed part of the Greater Poland-Kuyavia area, which was the cradle of the Polish state in the 10th century, and belonged to Poland until the late-18th-century Partitions of Poland. It did not form part of the region of Prussia, it was only annexed by the Kingdom of Prussia (which should not be confused with the region of Prussia) in the partitions of Poland. Have a nice day. Marcin 303 (talk) 08:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section needs attention from an historian
Wikipedia talk:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 July 10

message: uh this is the currnet ID for a movie. DO NOT DELETE.
I agree. This is the only identification given for this movie at this time in it's trailers. dr. yesterday 05:00, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: These comments were moved from Talk:1-18-08 to here because of malplaced comments. I'm moving them here for centralized discussion. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 22:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments about 18 Jan 2008 redirects → Cloverfield discussion, mistakenly left at [[Talk:1-18-08]]
Talk:Book of the Dead (anthology)

message: FYI.   Ikip (talk) 08:32, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of zombie novels]] is currently up for [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List of zombie novels|deletion]] 
Talk:Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 2990

message: As it stands, this article is effectively just the text of a document which makes it more suitable for Wikisource rather than for Wikipedia.  If there is encyclopedic content regarding the history of this document or its importance, then a Wikipedia article could be appropriate.
Please indicate whether there is more content intended for this article.
--Richard 14:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Deathstalker (film)

message: This labeling of the Conan the Barbarian film as "sword and sandal" doesn't make much sense.  Robert E. Howard practically created the Sword and Sorcery genre single-handed.  The Conan films, although only loosely based on R.E. Howard stories, were firmly in the Sword and Sorcery camp.  Sword and Sandal generally refers to films with no element of the supernatural, such as Spartacus.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by CLSwiki (talk • contribs) 19:31, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conan the Barbarian (film) as "sword and sandal" ?
Talk:Video game behavioral effects

message: This article needs a good clean-up per WP:STYLE. MarašmusïneTalk 13:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

message: This sentence in the intorduction "In 1982, the U.S. Surgeon General lamented the lack of such evidence (Selnow, 1984)." is an almost word-for-word copy from page 4 of an article titled "What Do We Know About Computer and Video Games? A Comprehensive Review of Literature." written by Wei Peng and Kwan Min Lee, and published by the International Communication Association in 2004.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.3.13.68 (talk) 00:59, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagarism 

message: I checked both articles and it seemed that many of the contents overlap. I suggest turning video game effects into a redirect.--Janarius 13:40, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[media violence research]] merge 

message: Categorisations of 'positive' and 'negative' effects here are rather subjective.
Eg. "Many companies and organizations are turning to video games as easy and interactive ways to train individuals. The U.S. Army even utilizes the game, America’s Army, as a recruitment tool."--81.153.60.106 (talk) 11:26, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I added an experiment that was done on Top Gear to back up the claim that video games have positive effects. I personally think the 'positive' and 'negative' effects sections could be rewritten in a format that is easier to read rather then paragraph after paragraph. However, at the moment I cannot think of one.
leeaaro4 16:25, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Interview with Ferguson here. We can summarize his works and cite them in the article. It's just a matter of getting round to it :) Marasmusine (talk) 18:01, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Positive Case

message: We'd discussed a potential merger before with Media Violence Research, and I agree that's not the right destination.  However the page Video Game Controversy appears to be an obvious merger spot.  From what I can see the content overlaps entirely at this point, such there wouldn't really be anything to "move" over into the other article, as everything here is already replicated there, just with less POV as this article has.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.91.76.208 (talk) 14:21, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging to Video Game Controversy
Talk:Zarya (polar ship)

message: Mmm. Putting up the NYC flag could have been as paying homage to the Czar, because that club, the oldest in the world was founded by Peter the Great - another Russian Czar. So it is, as a gesture, respectful to the Russian monarchy.  (61.7.144.150 (talk) 10:01, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neva Yacht Club flag 
Talk:Wireless tools for Linux

message: This edit made the article internally inconsistent, using the terms "Linux" and "GNU/Linux" interchangeably. This is confusing; we should use one or the other. It also re-added an unneeded line break. It should be reverted. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 19:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent revert
Talk:Diether Lukesch

message: Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found link, just passing mentions. 
No de.wiki article exists. Did not hold a significant command and topped out as Captain. Successful completion of missions is not part of SOLDIER. Please also see a note at  MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect. In summary, per the outcome of the discussion at Notability:People on notability of Knight's Cross recipients: permalink, certain recipients were deemed non notable and WP:SOLDIER has been modified accordingly: diff. The articles of these recipients are being redirected to alphabetical lists.
K.e.coffman (talk) 19:28, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Lauri Pekuri

message: He also participated in the evaluation of the MiG-21 fighters that were to be purchased to Finland. He recommended the Finnish Air Force not to buy them, but the deal went through due to political reasons.
Pekuri describes this in his book Hävittäjälentäjä. The fighter evaluated in this case was MiG-19. The reasons for not recommending it were the 
handling right after surpassing sonic speed and what seemed lack of missile weaponry of which there wasn't information available. However it is true that political reasons worked for MiG 21 against Mirage III.Noseball (talk) 00:23, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation of MiG-21
Talk:Sugar Grove Station

message: conspiracyy much? --72.88.238.73 (talk) 01:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conspiracy

message: Link to GSA auction listing: http://gsaauctions.gov/gsaauctions/aucdsclnk?sl=PEACH416004001 71.179.241.250 (talk) 21:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  GSA Auction
Talk:1945 (Conroy novel)

message: Doesn't make any sense at all.  Did it CONTINUE till 1946?  Or was it DELAYED until 1946? 2A02:2788:11A8:34:E2CB:4EFF:FE88:1A2D (talk) 15:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  resumed until
Talk:Benzphetamine

message: is benzphetamine the same as phetermine? i was taking phetermine for three months and had dry mouth but it worked great,then the dry mouth stopped and i was hungry soon after taking it.that was about 2 weeks ago. now this is my second day on benzphetamine. because my body was so used to taking the phetermine, will this pill work or is it the same??   ♣♥♣♥ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.61.243.205 (talk • contribs) 14:27, 13 Jul 2007 (UTC)

message: So if you take it for the right purposes no matter how much you take you won't hallucinate?
Also, NPOV? Right and wrong are matters of opinion, particularly concerning the proper purpose of something. The article should say that excess dosages beyond X amount is likely to cause hallucinations.75.133.90.126 (talk) 08:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  for the wrong purposes?
Talk:Nightwood

message: The cover photograph may be the on the first edition of the publisher currently holding rights, but it certainly isn't a first edition of the first publication. 171.64.43.105 (talk) 03:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The label has been corrected.  I would purchase and upload a 1st edition scan, but they are all ungodly expensive.Npd2983 (talk) 17:57, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph incorrectly labeled 

message: I think it would be wise to refer to Nightwood as a work of 'lesbian literature' rather than of 'gay literature' -- for the sake of specificity, and because the page for 'gay literature' indicates that works of that genre are generally about male homosexuality. The Times Literary Supplement referred to Nightwood as a "classic of modernist and lesbian literature." --Cixxxous (talk) 04:42, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Switching from 'gay literature' to 'lesbian literature' genre? 

message: The plot summary sections are so long as to potentially interfere with the value of a) this page b) reading the novel.  Are there Wikipedia standards that would justify pruning them down a bit?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wooverine (talk • contribs) 20:21, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ideally, they'd be shorter, but the nature of the book makes a shorter summation practically impossible. I tried my best here, and am happy to hear feedback. Iseult Δx parlez moi 03:02, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  the plot summaries are *very* long