lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:6-8-6

message: Speed of turbines on the 6-8-6
There was a query about and alteration to article re; the speed of turbines rotating at 2,000 m.p.h. or 2,000 r.p.m. Verified the source, (Staufer, p. 240) and he says steam struck the turbines a 'speed of two thousand miles per hour', perhaps the turbines didn't rotate at that speed; but then many marine turbines rotate at 6,000 r.p.m and the 6-8-6 turbines were an adaptation of marine power plants (Staufer, p. 241). Unsure if a loco's steam turbine rotating at 2,000 r.p.m. would deliver sufficient horsepower to drive a train at 100 m.p.h. Staufer has a pic of the 6-8-6 turbine at p. 241. Tonyob 05:34, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The claim that the PRR S2 was the only 6-8-6 ever built was added by an IP in 2005, with no substantiation: Special:Diff/14994984. I don't especially doubt that this is true, but I can't find any source other than Wikipedia which makes this claim. It's not in Staufer's Pennsy Power, nor in Hagley's PRR Chronology, nor Don Ball's history of the Pennsylvania Railroad. Mackensen (talk) 16:45, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's hard to find a source that says "there are no other 6-8-6s", but then there are no sources to even suggest there are any others, nor any credible likelihood of such. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:56, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Your point is well-taken. I've reworded. Mackensen (talk) 19:17, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unique?
Talk:Wardog

message: There are two topics in Wikipedia about "Wardog/War dogs"!!!
Wardog
and
War Dogs
Wardog is shorter. 
I suggest we either merge Wardog with War Dogs, or just delete it entirely.
Jak722 18:36, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urgent! 

message: Two dogs are mentioned here, but from the fact that they were given names and ranks in WWI I would guess that they were mascots and not actual fighting dogs. Does anyone have any evidence against this? DJ Clayworth 20:30, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, maybe I'm wrong. Forget it. DJ Clayworth 20:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chips and Stubby
Talk:Experimental literature

message: Experimental_music
Experimental_film --Jahsonic 08:16, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled #2]

message: Yes, this article defanitly needs more information on the genre as a whole. Is anyone intrested in helping me expand this? S.dedalus 19:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Will Help

message: The mention of Sterne's supposed "post-modern approach" needs some serious clarification, seeing as the novel pre-dates even the Modernist movement by over a century. 82.32.83.42 13:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-phrasing

message: I was admittedly disappointed when no mention was made of Finnegan's Wake, by Joyce. It should definitely receive mention as the article is expanded.
69.210.117.126 (talk) 01:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree with this; why is Finnegans Wake not mentioned? The man rested his legacy on the book, and it's one of the most powerful examples of experimental literature (being one of the biggest) as well as being a very important precursor and influence to postmodernism! 76.229.183.123 (talk) 03:49, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Finnegan's Wake?

message: Why are you censoring our page? At the behest of a vanity publisher? Is the criteria for validity money? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.32.146.31 (talk) 22:18, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The link is being removed because it does not meet the requirements of our external linking guidelines.   Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:09, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: External link

message: The article includes an image of the first page of an experimental novel as an illustrative example. No problem there. The example, however, is by one David Detrick. David who? Indeed. I will wait to see if anyone replies to this comment successfully justifying such a ridiculous image. If not, I will go ahead an edit it out. Oulipal (talk) 21:53, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: David who?
Talk:Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventures

message: Are these two cartoons even the same series?  I was under the impression that the first series was cancelled and the second was a new attempt at adapting the movie.  Different network, production company, and (almost?) entirely different staff.  The only things they seemed to have in common was they had the same name and were adapting the same movie.
That said, Hulu lists them as the same series, so I'm far from sure.  Anyone know the background on the change? Would make interesting reading for the article.
Might as well put the live actions stuff in with these cartoons too. --Roger McCoy/រ៉ាចើ (talk) 18:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same series?
Talk:Banu Aws

message: Is this and "Banu Aws" the same tribe? --Striver 18:40, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The most widely accepted English transliteration is simply "Aws". Pecher Talk 19:59, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

message: "Aus" is the name of their progenitor, the name of the tribe is "Banu Aus". --Striver - talk 19:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rename
Talk:Altered Beast (album)

message: The article as currently written looks biased toward the singer.  It's possible the article was taken directly from an album jacket or written by the singer or someone related.  Needs some cleanup to remain neutral. Dugwiki 18:45, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV problem 

message: Allmusic.com and various online feature stories list ex-Fleetwood Mac producer Richard Dashut as the producer for Altered Beast. I notice currently Sweet and Maher are listed here. I don't have the CD, so I don't know how the credits read...perhaps different tracks have different producer credits? Or the Wikipedia entry has a typo?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.86.248.55 (talk) 15:12, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producer credit 

message: Should this entry reflect the track listing of the Japanese release of the album, which was different? Or should it go under a separate entry?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.136.139 (talk) 23:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese release track listing? 

message: Release date updated to 13 July 1993. Information source: Amazon.com and Music Brainz.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.136.139 (talk) 23:21, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date 
Talk:2-6-0+0-6-2

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 2-6-0+0-6-2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081227210059/http://www.sandstone-estates.com:80/heritage/rail/news/rn141/rn141.htm to http://www.sandstone-estates.com/heritage/rail/news/rn141/rn141.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 Thank you. André Kritzinger (talk) 13:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Template talk:Archbishops of Canterbury

message: Hmm, it seems that Rowan Williams is always ending up on his own line at the bottom of the template, after George Carey ·.  This is odd because there is plenty of room on that line for the text. I have changed font sizes and have tried in both IE and Firefox and cannot figure out why. Thx. — MrDolomite • Talk 00:56, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrapping

message: The collapsed state is consistent with other templates for English Church hierarchy and make for a better fit on stub and start pages, which many of the Archbishops still are.
As for the three-tiered chronological lay out, this too is consistent with the consensus that was established for the Featured List of the Archbishops. Is there reason to ignore these conventions on this nav box? I just noticed we went over both these issues in 2007 - see above. -- Secisek (talk) 00:25, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is MUCH better - thank you for doing it. Timothy Titus Talk To TT 01:53, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I prefer the collapsed version also, much better. It makes sense to make the template layout match the list, too. Ealdgyth - Talk 02:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Current layout

message: Consensus above (three editors weighing in) was that this template should be collapsed. I've reverted back to that state. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The collapsed state is pointless it makes it harder (i no not that harder but still...) to find the names and anyway with multiple templates it closes itself anyway. The Quill (talk) 18:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Note that the above consensus was that it should be collapsed though. Ealdgyth - Talk 19:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ok and... I didnt realise a consesus was for life or else i think the whole of wikipedia is stuffed. A NEW consensus can be reached so arguing that a previous consus without using an justification doesnt do anything. The Quill (talk) 16:08, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  That was only in January of this year, so it's hardly for "life". Personally, I consider collapsed to be the better option, as it's less distraction at the bottom of the page. It's all a matter of opinion, you find it easier uncollapsed, I find it better collapsed. Often, the template is by itself, especially on the earlier archbishops, so it won't collapse itself in that situation. Let's see what others have to say on it. Ealdgyth - Talk 16:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I also would prefer it to start in the collapsed state. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 14:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collapsed status
Template talk:ArchbishopofCanterbury-stub

message: an Archbishop of Canterbury (or a failed candidate to that post)
Who fits into the latter category?  Certainly nowadays someone would never know if they had been considered for the post. TSP 11:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sometimes a medieval king would nominate one, but the pope would refuse to confirm the nomination. Neddyseagoon - talk 19:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed candidates?
Talk:BAWAG P.S.K.

message: * for - both pages are about the same thing (131.130.121.106 18:51, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Bruce WILLIAM BERCIER junior
510 Martinville Loop NE
BELCOURT ND
58316
TURTLE MOUNTAIN band of
Chippewa reservation
50yrs old
BROWN hair and eyes
5-5 tall
SSI number 50274
Chippewa ID 304-U019
Cell number +1(701)278-2627 Bruce W BERCIER jr (talk) 15:09, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  36 million
Talk:2-6-6-2

message: In a succession of revisions, I have reorganized the material on usage of these engines by nation, generally in the order of adoption: USA, Mexico, Serbia, South Africa, Soviet Union. Within the USA section I have introduced third level headings for phases of development. I have expanded the list of references and the number of citations, particularly for newly introduced material. 
I would hope the revised article could be reviewed and assessed higher than "Start class". AlexSchneiderJr (talk) 08:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: One change I neglected to mention: I changed the information concerning first use of this wheel arrangement from a 1910 engine built for South Africa, to a 1906 engine built for the Great Northern Railway. AlexSchneiderJr (talk) 08:37, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant expansion and reorganization
Talk:Enteropeptidase

message: is from the cow, but as this article is about enteropeptidase in all higher lifeforms, perhaps we can use it to illustrate the article. JFW | T@lk 18:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

message: The article had really good information, but was very technical.  I put in a layman-level paragraph regarding the psysiologic function of the enzyme, and tried to make it something one could relate to.  Thoughts on the appropriateness of this?  Also, though the enzyme is not a kinase, it is still referred to as enterokinase in a great number of texts, especially medical ones, included recently published ones.  I think its too early to simply change the name and be done with it. For the time being, though one name clearly makes more functional sense, this enzyme has two names.  OsteopathicFreak 06:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:MSN QnA

message: : Oppose. Similar to Yahoo! Answers and Google Answers articles having a page on its own. This should not be merged. However this page is still a stub and should have more contents added explaining how QnA works. Pikablu0530 10:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Windows Live

message: How to Edit English in USA? Anyone has some idea for this question? Please suggest me?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Poonamjvis (talk • contribs) 08:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please suggest me? 
Talk:Paul Eiding

message: This guy has one of the coolest voices ever.  Everbody I know seem to recognize him from Diablo and Starcraft and have never even played Metal Gear Solid, so I moved those to the top of the list.
*...I can't watch Ben_10. I keep expecting Max Tennyson to tell Snake or Raiden to do something. I disagree with your choice but I agree with your boldness. Teh Shingen 06:04, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Under the "Filmography" section (more specifically under "Video Games") I changed his credit for Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty. It said he did the voice of Roy Campbell. This is inaccurate because in MGS2 you learn that the Colonel was actually an AI set to resemble Campbell. I've changed it so that it says "The Colonel".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.34.217.222 (talk) 01:44, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed inaccuracy 

message: It's towards the bottom.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.95.161.99 (talk) 00:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bionicle Movie Proof 

message: I know he did the acting for 'Felldir the Old' in Skyrim, but I'm not sure how to add the information to the article. If someone could, thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.139.176.186 (talk) 09:17, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skyrim Voice acting
Talk:Emmanuelle Vaugier

message: This is copied (or vice versa, perhaps) from http://www.emmanuellevaugier.com/bio.htm. It is also poorly written. Endos 22:03, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing?

message: Emmanuelle Vaugier (born June 23, 1979) is a Canadian film and television actress
:There is a reference for 1976. There is no reference for 1979. Cite your source. 76.254.20.247 (talk) 21:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her profession 

message: This line in the "Television" section "Even within the Hollywood world awash in beautiful women, her unique facial beauty stands out above all others." is seriously NPOV.
Possibly left over from the previously noted legacy of this article being copied from her website?
Is there any reason it shouldn't be delete?
SLEPhoto (talk) 21:05, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV material 
Talk:Jon Jang

message: --Michaeldessen (talk) 01:35, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the term "Asian American jazz movement" 

message: --Michaeldessen (talk) 23:00, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI discussion 

message: I am an author working on a grant-funded book about music and musicians, one of whom is Jon Jang. I'm new to the process of writing content for Wikipedia (never done it). I've written enough about him that I could rework some of it into Wikipedia-appropriate content to add to the page started on him here. I'm wondering about the best practice of this. Do I have a conflict of interest because I was paid to do the writing I've done so far? Does Wikipedia have writers on hand who are already aligned with its guidelines who could take this on, using my writing (it's posted on my own website already, as work in progress) as one of its references? (As it stands, it is informative and accurate, but not conscientiously objective or comprehensive...more idiosyncratically focused on aspects of interest to me.) Or should I find someone to do that myself?
Some guidance would be appreciated.AIRman (talk) 18:30, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI clarification
Talk:4-6-6-4

message: So I'm really glad that challenger 3985 is being restored, but I'm wondering what kind of time frame should I expect for challenger 3985 to be restored. 47.202.52.220 (talk) 08:50, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect, based on your question, that you found one of our over 6.6 million articles and thought we were affiliated in some way with that subject. Please note that you are at Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and this page is for discussion on how to improve the 4-6-6-4 article. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:26, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Challenger 3985 restoration
Talk:Kim Clark (candidate)

message: If anyone actually knows substantive material, i.e. on issues, pleeeeeeeeeeeeeese put them in.  He will be worthy at least until November.
--
I expanded article to include more biographical information.  The article still needs work, particularly dates Clark occupied each position.  Hope this is helpful. --Jfloydnv 01:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The election has passes and this page is sorely out of date. Bobryuu 06:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Needed 

message: Rewrote and reorganized/re-categorized most sections to better meet standards and regular layout.  Removed redundancies and updated sections when necessary.  Removed POV Neutrality concern- no longer an issue. --Trolph (talk) 19:08, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Overhaul

message: I checked ImDb for several of the producer, executive producer credits and he is NOT listed as having worked for any of the films or tv programs referenced. Further, "Oh, Grow Up" does not appear to have ever been Emmy Nominated. Can his representative provide citations for those facts that prove their accuracy?  Nikiwan14 (talk) 17:25, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations Missing
Talk:4-8-8-2

message: The caption for that picture says "Southern Pacific Railroad #4274, a type 4-8-8-2 "cab-forward" steam locomotive, leads a California-Nevada Railroad Historical Society excursion out of Reno, Nevada in December of 1957." So that train was scrapped, right? When did that happen? I'm betting the photo was taken in the last few years of its life -- you don't really hear about important steam trains being scrapped after like 1965, due to historical interest. --Ragemanchoo (talk) 09:56, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: SP 4274 ran the last run over Donner Pass for a cab-forward on November 30, 1957; this was filmed (see http://www.goldenspike.us/?page=shop/flypage&product_id=19863&CLSN_1119=120696049711198ad32f5bb2bb7135dd).  This must have been not long after, and I suspect it was withdrawn from service shortly after.  The last cab-forward to be scrapped was in 1960.  All were disposed of except 4294, the last built. Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 10:56, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Train in the picture?
Talk:Dickey (garment)

message: Is this article correctly titled?  My OED had no entry for 'dickie' but has 'dicky/dickey', pluralised as 'dickies/dickeys'. Matthew 23:08, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

message: "Underwear"? A dickey isn't underwear. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blg999 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dickeys have been worn two different ways, similar, but different. This article mostly describes the dickey as a shirtfront which I'll call the traditional style, rarely worn today, which I would also not classify as "underwear", except that it is under your jacket but in a sense over or part of your shirt. The current surviving modern form of dickey, for example the turtleneck dickey mentioned in the article, is more a piece of undershirt, worn to appear as if you are wearing a turtleneck sweater under your shirt, but it's really just the turtleneck part. I think the article should reflect this. Traditionally, a man appearing in public or receiving guests at home without his jacket on would be considered as if he were wearing underwear, but where having your shirtfront dickey laundered separately from the shirt would be to save you from laundering your shirt, I would expect today that people would more frequently launder the shirt and not the dickey which is worn for appearance or perhaps as a warmer wrap for the neck without wearing a full sweater. source: my mother used to put me in turtleneck dickeys! 108.14.125.206 (talk) 20:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: Mabalu (talk) 10:48, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image added, tag removed from talk page
Talk:2-8-8-8-4

message: This must have been among the most powerful locomotives built - does anyone have any specs?  How did it compare to challengers and big boys or other similar locomotives?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.31.184.166 (talk) 20:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see the final paragraph of 2-8-8-8-2#Overview_of_Triplex_engineering and the first paragraph of Tractive_effort#Values_and_comparisons_for_steam_locomotives for the best information on this topic that Wikipedia currently has. It cites various figures and does not make clear whether there was much difference between Baldwin's 2 Triplex models (2-8-8-8-2 and 2-8-8-8-4). Hopefully eventually more definitive info will find its way here from secondary sources. — ¾-10 17:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tractive Force ? 
Talk:Nazilli

message: ==Comment==
I wikified your Nazilli page. It sounds like a beautiful place. Please let me know if I made any mistakes, as I had to do some rewording.  KarenAnn 19:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I wikified your Nazilli page. It sounds like a beautiful place. Please let me know if I made any mistakes, as I had to do some rewording.  KarenAnn 19:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:A590 road

message: There are too many links relating to the High Newton Bypass. Also, the road is not congested through High and Low Newton, it's just got a few bends in it. The statement that the whole of the route from Lindale to Barrow may be considered for dualling should have a citation, otherwise it might be regarded as pure conjecture. Arcturus 19:15, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest that has been congested, although mostly due to the frequent accidents because of those bends you mentioned, or when large lorries get "stuck". I've changed some of the tenses in the article, on account of the bypass being about to open (the first non-construction vehicle passed along it yesterday) Audigex (talk) 23:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled