Talk:Kashmir conflict

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
* 
* 
You can see the reasons for deletion at the file description pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:23, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
* 
* 
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion 

message: The source for "The European Union holds the view that the plebiscite is not in Kashmiris' interest" under >Efforts to end the dispute >Contemporary views on UN resolutions is simply fake. It doesn't exist, it redirects you to a bitcoin page. It is reference 432. Check it out. Also the claim that kashmiris dont want plebiscite is BS, here is a Reuters poll saying otherwise :https://www.reuters.com/article/us-kashmir-poll-idUSDEL29179620070813 include this as the source for the true statement. 99.230.152.36 (talk) 08:38, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed the EU link; will leave the second part to someone else -- Asartea Talk | Contribs 11:59, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Not done: article is correct as written. Opinion on independence depends on the region. The article says  Ref. 405 is the Reuters citation, and the text of the article is consistent with it. Xan747 (talk) 23:21, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 June 2023 

message: Incomplete information can be sentimentally harmful. You need to properly address about what was done to Kashmiri Pandits too. It was a major case of law which was barely handled by the then government."Scholars" and existent people can tell you about that too if there's no research available at hand. There should be no evidence of right or left wing when and if you're writing about such a topic on Wikipedia. You need to cover all evident cases of Kashmir conflict not just what seems right and fair to one's eye. 5.24.167.94 (talk) 00:52, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need additions about the most important factor 

message: Inside Human Rights Abuses update the partly free of Indian Administered Kashmir to not free according to the latest Freedom House Report. Pakistan and India both are rated as "partly free" at the moment. 
https://freedomhouse.org/country/india/freedom-world/2024
https://freedomhouse.org/country/pakistan/freedom-world/2024
Change 
The Freedom in the World 2006 report categorised Indian-administered Kashmir as "not free", and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, as well as the country of Pakistan, as "not free".[479]
To
The Freedom in the World 2024 report categorised Indian-administered Kashmir as "not free", and Pakistan-administered Kashmir as "not free".
Source:
https://freedomhouse.org/country/indian-kashmir/freedom-world/2024 4lways4ccelerate (talk) 08:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I added information on the new ratings, but did not remove the old ones - it seems helpful to show the change over a relatively short period of time. Thanks for pointing this out. Jamedeus (talk) 09:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: All right, thanks 4lways4ccelerate (talk) 15:55, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 March 2024