lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The $5.98 E.P. – Garage Days Re-Revisited

message: I tried to make a few revisions (rewrote a number of sentences to clarify some things), but I encountered some potential factual inaccuracies.  I have deleted a few things, but refrained from adding other things, pending discussion here.  Here are the issues I found:  
*It was always my understanding that the album was recorded in Lars' garage, yet the infobox says it was recorded at A & M and Conway Studios, LA July, 1987.  Which is correct?
*I also believed the statement regarding the band's intent regarding the title/price of the EP/CD was indeed accurate, but I subsequently discovered this site (http://ilikethat.com/metallica/history86-89.cfm) which contained this photo (http://ilikethat.com/metallica/img/garage_days6.jpg).  Any thoughts?
*I am reasonably certain that the cover of any CD copy of the recording that bears the inscription $5.98 EP rather than $9.98 CD is an unathorized bootleg (and always rather obviously so, at least in my own experience) rather than an official release.  Anyone convinced otherwise?
Everyone's input is greatly appreciated...  -Grammaticus Repairo 07:45, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have the album on CD. I forget where the case is, and the CD's somewhere in a case of other ones. 71.60.159.181 03:48, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks User:71.60.159.181 for the useful info.  Dumbass.  -70.251.93.156 (talk) 23:46, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fact Checking

message: wheres the damn cover?
	
not as upload images to wikipedia, but the image you see in the article are not very well, I would say that this would have a better quality regarding the other image.
http://images.google.co.cr/images?ndsp=20&um=1&hl=es&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:es-ES:official&q=garage+days+re-revisited&start=0&sa=N
The first image!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.200.212.182 (talk) 21:32, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  cover 

message: I need to make changes in this article, I have the original EP since 1987 Elektra/Asylum Records. Made in U.S.A. by WEA Manufacturng Inc. --CliffordLeeBurtonMetallica (talk) 16:59, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: I need to make changes in this article

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Garage days revisited. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 13#Garage days revisited until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  JJPMaster (talk) 16:04, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Garage days revisited" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:FAC

message: Is there any reason why this should go to Farm Credit Canada instead of Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates? Rad Racer 09:45, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and use it for your TLA. No need to dab. I agree that TLA's should generally not be redir'ed out of the main name space, although some longer abbreviations (e.g. TBSDY) are probably obscure enough to be harmless. Rad Racer 13:04, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comment

message: I was wandering if the FAC for the Fire Arms Certificate should be included in this disambiguation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.38.211 (talk) 21:32, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire Arms Certificate.
Talk:Melbourne Cricket Ground

message: Hey can you edit it so it says arena or oval instead of stadium the MCG can't be a stadium as it isn;t ine  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.50.250.155 (talk) 06:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I know what you mean, but Wikipedia tends to use language the way Americans use it. The stadium article says "A stadium...is a place or venue for (mostly) outdoor sports, concerts, or other events and consists of a field or stage either partly or completely surrounded by a tiered structure designed to allow spectators to stand or sit and view the event." That's a very accurate description of the G. HiLo48 (talk) 06:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The MCG isn't a stadium
Talk:Mumbles

message: Oh, come on. If Mumbles is a village, nowhere would be big enough to qualify as a city. It's more than large enough to be a town, with plenty of shops and many houses. [213.105.224.14]
:Mumbles is certainly *not* a town, by the common usage of the term in the UK. It is clearly a reasonably large village though. The nearest 'town' is Swansea. --Vamp:Willow 11:36, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamlet, Village or Small Town 

message: Currently the article mentions that "Famous poet Dylan Thomas was said to have enjoyed many hours at The Mermaid, now a restaurant and coffee lounge." - Sadly the Mermaid that Dylan Thomas frequented was badly damaged by fire circa 1997 and by 1999 had been demolished.  The restaurant and coffee lounge is on the same site, but significantly different.  I used to work the bar at The Mermaid but had left for Uni by then so if anyone can improve on the dates and details please do. --Ear1grey 12:43, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire at The Mermaid 

message: Perhaps a section describing times when Mumbles has been recorded in popular media would be useful?   Obvious things that spring to mind are Ennels Point and the coffin scene in Twin Town, but there must be more... --Ear1grey 12:43, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the Media 

message: The Mile really deserves a section of it's own, with a little detail and an explanation of why it became well known and how it's changed since it's initial infamy.  The closure of two of the four mumbles nightclubs (Neptunes &  Secrets (later named Barberellas)), the conversion of the Prince of Wales, and probably several other factors have all played a part as Mumbles nightlife has evolved. --Ear1grey 12:50, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mumbles Mile 

message: I've added some info on the previously "development" title of the article which I've now changed to "history". Hope everything's fine. (Cepb 21:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Info Added to History Section

message: She grew up living in the Mayals, and went to school in Swansea.
That is not Mumbles.
78.145.186.41 (talk) 12:07, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catherine Zeta Jones 
Talk:Model minority

message: # There are several references missing throughout the article, and several of the citations linked at the bottom are not working. 
# The article begins disaggregating how the model minority myth impacts different Asian demographics, but only does so for Southeast and South Asians. There is no specific section dedicated to the model minority myth and East Asians in the United States. The term South Asians is also often used as a synonym for Indian Americans, even though this is inaccurate as the region of South Asia includes several other countries/demographics. 
# The model minority myth has been evidenced to impact people of different genders in different ways. There is no mention of how the myth may impact women and queer folk different than cisgender men. 
~~~~  Sonalchuriwal (talk) 17:14, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of Model Minority Article  

message: — Assignment last updated by Jtran83 (talk) 08:39, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Migration in World History

message: These articles are BOTH discussing the same stereotype. And, as has been written in numerous places (Time Magazine 'How the Model Minority Myth of Asian Americans Hurts Us All'; CNBC 'How the model minority myth holds Asian Americans back at work - and what companies should do'; NPR ' 'Model Minority' Myth Again Used as a Racial Wedge Between Asians and Blacks; USC Pacifica Asia Museum 'Debunking the Model Minority Myth'; National Cancer Institute ' 'Model Minority' Stereotype'; 'Unraveling the Model Minority Stereotype: Listening to Asian American Youth' by Stacy J. Lee, and even more dangerously described as the flip side of the coin of the money-mad Jew/Asian rendered seemingly positive (Transgressions of a Model Minority by Jonathan Freedman; etc); and the list goes on, it is being addressed in most of the current discourse as a stereotype that is harmful to everyone, whether the group described as such or an outside group, whether it has become a self-identifier or is externally applied. What is the point of having two articles on the same topic? Why not merge them both into one under the subsection of stereotypes? Model Minority Myth and Model Minority Stereotype are two names for the same thing. Why not merge the content and state them as name variations? Thoughts? KnowTheManyHistories (talk) 23:16, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merger: Model Minority & Model Minority Myth 

message: Statistics should probably be updated to include African countries, as an extremely high percentage of immigrants from various countries in Africa hold a Bachelor's degree or higher and the chart does not include this. KnowTheManyHistories (talk) 02:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics: Update 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ec2903 (talk) 22:48, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Race in America, sec 2
Talk:L'Histoire du soldat

message: # Expand information about music and make into its own section.
## Add notes about the percussion part: Stravinsky's meticulous scoring, how it's often played incorrectly.
## Add notes about different versions of the score and recordings conducted by Stravinsky
# Make it clear that the piece is notable more for the music than the story.
# Explain historical significance … 1917 revolution; scaled down from Stravinsky's "big three" ballets; etc. Find sources.
– flamurai (t)
Joseph Dupraz, a Russian soldier? What is he doing between Denges and Denezy, then?????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsitarque (talk • contribs) 02:44, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do 

message: I'm confused already after reading the first 5 words of the lede.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 19:18, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The article should probably be moved to L'Histoire du soldat. In any case, the 1st sentence could be simplified to " (The Soldier's Tale) is a …". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done.  Thanks.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 11:14, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

text: The people at kcatalog.org are certainly firm in their statement about the title. There's still the question whether WP:COMMONNAME will trump them. It seems there is a considerable number of sources using L'Histoire, but it's not overwhelming. Maybe our previous decision was based on too much trust in our French colleagues who use :fr:L'Histoire du soldat and don't even have a redirect at :fr:Histoire du soldat, despite some incoming links there (including at :fr:Charles Ferdinand Ramuz!). I agree that it could be moved back to . -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:01, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Histoire or L'Histoire?
Talk:Strong antichain

message: Because it's handy to have a convention to stick to and because no one else seems to care about the subject, I've made a judgement call on which convention to use. If anyone is particularly bothered by this, feel free to change it - I don't have a terribly strong opinion on the subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitarak (talk • contribs) 12:56, 27 February 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Marxist–Leninist Party, USA

message: Actually MLP, USA was the name used by this party, not MLP (US). The article should be moved back. --Soman 13:35, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: How would any determine if anyone of this correct?  There is virtually nothing on this page cited?  Is this even a legitimate organization?  There must be some secondary sources out there that provides at least some bit of information. --xcuref1endx 21:17, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Poorly Sourced
Talk:Samuel Harvey

message: Is the section from the Daily Telegraph copyvio?  If it has permission, I think that should be posted on here.  Thanks, Smoddy (t) (e) 13:36, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bannerghatta National Park

message: Hi, I put the cleanup message up because I thought that the content was a little misorganised, with repeated references to mismanagement alternating with normal "so many species and so many animals" information. I was hoping for someone to come up, put more information, as well as organise it out with sections on the zoo, controversy, etc. nicely separated out. Of course, if you think the article looks better like this, feel free to take out 'cleanup', or replace it with 'stub'. Gaurav 13:42, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: removed the clean-up tag and put stub in its place. Please replace it with topic specific stub template if you can. I searched around and couldn't get to one. --H P Nadig 16:50, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: btw, If you've been to bangalore or visited this national park, you would know that there's nothing else very significant to be mentioned about this zoo cum mini reserve dubbed National park other than the state of dismay it is in as of now. Most state papers here carried out stories on how animals (even the aquatic habitat ones) have had no water in their exhibits. This should tell the terrible state of maintenance its in. --H P Nadig 08:24, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup? 

message: The photo gallery contains many redundant images (same animals) serving no important purpose, which I feel is unnecessary. Your thoughts? Vignyana (talk) 11:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant images
Talk:Red Herring Artists

message: :This article was nominated for deletion on June 3, 2005; the consensus was no consensus. For discussion, please see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Red Herring Artists.
----
I considered wether this was applicable to be in the wikipedia and concluded that under the guidelines it should be.
for one the organisation is not a profitmaking business and more importantly It is regularly the subject of academic papers on art history and the history of design.
I will return when possible to add more detail - including a list of signifigant artists that have been associated with the group.
DavidP 13:44, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: I am a member of Red Herring Studios and I have just been tidying up the spelling and punctuation of the entry and making sure the links work.
Red Herring is exactly as it is described - a not for profit artist's collective and its members have been active in the Brighton area and much further afield since 1985.
I agree we need to be more explicit with the references to members and their achievements.  Being a relatively new member I am not best placed to do this but I will ask DavidP who is a founder member and origional author of this piece to have a look at it.
*The fact that you are a member of Red Herring studios makes me even more suspicious that this entry is self-promotion.  Don't take that too harshly - I'm not denigrating your collective or your own body of work.  I'm just saying that you may be viewing the importance of your group's work in a biased light.
*I also still question the verifiability and, especially, the notability of the group.  Keep going at it, though, the more work you put in cleaning it up, the better it looks (and the more likely it is to not be deleted). jglc | t | c 23:35, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer anonymous 

message: Actually, I do know about the Turner and Booker prizes; after seeing them in the article, I did some looking up on wikipedia and google. I take your point, however, that matters of some great significance may be overlooked simply by regional bias.
That said, if Vong Phaophanit is part of the collective, it is definitely notable.
jglc | t | c 15:48, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: reply

message: Hey DavidP;
I'm glad to see your changes to the article.  It looks good, now, and I'm looking forward to reading more about your collective.  Thanks for your work, and I hope to learn more from your entries on Wikipedia. jglc | t | c 14:11, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD response
Talk:Fuck buddy

message: This page borders on self parody of Wikipedia. In an effort to create some semblance of respectability, I've moved the 'Morality' section to the top. If someone feels that this is inappropriate, you can move it back down, and I'll let the issue drop.
:I feel the 'Morality' should be moved back to the end (in alphabetical order), as not adding any real value by being on top. Also, I think it would be better to reword it (I couldn't think of a proper way yet), as to avoid absolutism (concept of f.b. is not in accordance with traditional moral values implies that any culture's traditional moral values do not fit, and never did, whereas I am sure there were cultures that permited, and possibly even encouraged such relationships. Of course, this is not a researched fact, thut I'm commenting, not fixing).  --Yurik 15:15, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: I think the term "friend with benefits" is a better and more commonly used term for this.  What would you think about moving the article and setting up "fuck buddy" as a redirect? -Ld | talk 15:54, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it could be merged into casual sex? violet/riga (t) 16:01, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: Just saw you found friends with benefits - that'd be better, though I think that name is still somewhat unencyclopedic. violet/riga (t) 16:03, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think you're right.  I thought about this, and I think "casual relationship" might be the most appropriate term.  Afterall, they used it in the New York Times.  -Ld | talk 16:18, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good name for it. violet/riga (t) 16:22, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: All right, I'm going to attempt to merge the 2 of these into a third article (watch me screw this up :) -Ld | talk 19:35, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon visiting this article, I was redirected to casual relationship. I'm of the opinion a redirect to casual sex is more suitable. 'Fuck' means to fuck afterall. -- Longhair | Talk 20:47, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't there a better term than fuck buddy?
Talk:School bus yellow

message: I have removed the following text: The color was chosen because it attracts attention and is noticed quickly in peripheral vision, faster than any other color. Scientists describe this as follows: "Lateral peripheral vision for detecting yellows is 1.24 times greater than for red." This text was added on 5 February 2013, with this as a ref. The ref is problematic—it is a blog, first of all, and it appears to be a commercial one. That alone probably makes it unreliable as a source (per WP:BLOGS). Even worse, it offers no support for the claim about what "scientists" say. Which scientists, in what research conducted and published when and where? Were these scientists, if they exist, talking about yellow emitted light (as from a traffic signal) or yellow reflected light (as from a bus painted yellow)? Under what conditions? Versus what collection of other colors? As measured how? In what kinds of observers? How strong was the conclusion? We have no way of knowing any of this, and it all matters. It seems very unlikely that any real scientist would come out and say "Any yellow is exactly 1.24 times easier to see in peripheral vision than any red, by any human, without exception, in all circumstances, period, end of the discussion; we've answered that question completely and no further research is needed" -- that isn't how legitimate scientists really describe their work.
Unfortunately, because the text was in the article for so long, searching for a solid source results in a flood of sites and pages just parrotting it, verbatim, probably after reading it here on Wikipedia. That makes the claim very difficult to verify reliably.
If reliable sources can be found for the claim, it could be put back in if reliable sources link any such peripheral-vision advantage (if it exists) to the requirement that school buses be painted School Bus Yellow. Without that link it would be synthesis, which isn't allowed.173.180.13.37 (talk) 22:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious source, circular support
Talk:James Somersett

message: The article on Lord Mansfield states that Lord Mansfield stated "The air of England is too pure for a slave to breathe". The article on Habeas corpus also states this. However this states the opposite, that Lord Mansfield didn't say this. Which is correct?
This article is correct. Tough reading those articles carefully they don't directly quote Mansfield as the origin of the words but the case itself. This much is true as they were the argument of Somersett's legal council.Alci12 17:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistancy

message: "it did not end slavery in England or the British Empire".  Clearly not in other parts of the British Empire at that time.  But is there any evidence of chattel slavery in England from that point on? --Henrygb 00:06, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I followed the link to  --Henrygb 00:20, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I have re-written that paragraph, which is wrong. Somersett's case did not end slavery in England because slavery had already ceased to exist in England centuries before. Somersett was freed because the judge held that only a statute could bring slavery back into existence. Andrew Yong 15:21, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Slavery in England

message: I moved this to James Somerset, as most of the papers I can find about it prioritize that spelling. Hope that's okay. SlimVirgin (talk) 13:46, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Should this article be merged with Somerset's case?  It is not as if anything historical happened in his life other than being the subject matter of the trial? Legis 16:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Ephesus

message: Please consider including the insights from this newly published article: Bilby, Mark. G. and Anna Lefteratou. "A Dramatic Heist of Epic Proportion: Iphigenia among the Taurians in the Acts of the Apostles," Harvard Theological Review 115.4 (2002) 496-518. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816022000293
Full disclosure of potential bias: As one of the co-authors, I'm suggesting that this article be consulted and considered by Wikipedia editors, not presuming to evaluate whether it merits citation in this entry. Vocesanticae (talk) 16:02, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ephesus and Christianity (esp. the Acts of the Apostles) 

message: It is said that after an earthquake in the 6th century, the sea at Ephesus receded about 6 kilometers. Meanwhile, the mean sea level in the past 2000 years didn't change much. Does this mean that the earthquake in the 6 century raised the land of Ephesus to a higher level? --Roland (talk) 15:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sea Level Change at Ephesus?