lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Silver Bullet (film)

message: "Foreign-language adaptations have often based their titles on some variation of "The Werewolf of Tarker's Mill" instead of "Silver Bullet"."
I checked IMDB, and the only language that seems to follow that is German. In fact, all other titles seem to be "Silver Bullet", as far as I can tell. TomorrowTime (talk) 07:49, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  non-English titles 

message: Below is the removed "Trivia" section.  Please reintegrate the items into the article in the proper context, such as a "Production" section. Erik (talk) 23:04, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: I removed the "all plot" template and added "ref improve." It has been sufficiently expanded but needs more citations, particularly for the direct quotes in the "Reception" section. I'll see what I can find via a Google search. --momoricks 17:51, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I added citations for the direct quotes. --momoricks 19:22, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swapped cleanup notes
Talk:Lucas (1986 film)

message: The article makes two unsubstantiated references to a character called Jimmy, who is not mentioned anywhere else. Furthermore, the IMDB article does not credit anyone playing a character named Jimmy in this article. Is this vandalism? Ninebucks 14:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who's Jimmy?

message: Is something missing? The plot section talks about the football players pulling the worst prank ever on Lucas in the shower, but doesn't say what it was. Also, that section uses the word "budding" twice, which seems like once too many. How about a synonym? 74.190.141.131 (talk) 01:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: i have changed one of the 'budding' terms to 'growing'.  What do you think should be included about the 'worst prank'.  in which he had muscle heat put down his pants? Monkeymanman (talk) 08:46, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello 

message: Lucas vs George Lucas who's in the news now [Oct, 2012] 24.0.105.199 (talk) 16:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: Even if Roger Ebert did say the movie is "about teenagers who are looking how to be good with each other," it's doubtful whether his comment is worth quoting, as it's not even grammatical. Mucketymuck (talk) 03:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ebert's description 

message: Corey Feldman alleges his good friend Corey Haim told him that 20 year old Charlie Sheen raped Haim (then 13 years old) anally on the set of Lucas using Crisco oil as lubricant. This public allegation has been denied by Sheen and refuted by Haim's mother and sister. . Former actor and radio talk show performer Dominick Brascia also accused Sheen of raping Haim. Haim's mother Judy went on Dr. Oz show and refuted Brascia's claims and said that Brascia was Haim's real rapist.  Should this very public allegation and refutation be in the article?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivaldi (talk • contribs) 12:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it doesn't belong here on an article about the film. That would be WP:UNDUE with potential WP:BLP issues. If it goes anywhere, it should be in their respective articles, if it's not already. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 15:30, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charlie Sheen rape allegations by Corey Feldman
Talk:License to Drive

message: IIRC, didn't the film (which as the article notes did not leave much of a mark on culture when it was released; it was near the end of the '80s teen comedy cycle anyway) cause some controversy on its original release by playing some scenes where one of its leads drove drunk for laughs? This was explained at the time by the screenwriter being Canadian and thus somehow unaware of the massive PR effort against DWI that had been going on for at least eight years in the US, but still ... somehow I don't see Canada as a place where the idea of driving while intoxicated is somehow automatically considered side-splittingly funny?
Are there any sources out there we can find on this? Daniel Case (talk) 06:02, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Gerry St. Germain

message: As per suggestion, merging this article with Gerry Saint Germain and changing this one to a re-direct. Mokwella 07:31, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Bitter Tears of Petra von Kant

message: Is there any link between The_Bitter_Tears_of_Petra_von_Kant and the character Patra Von Kant played by Kylie_Minogue in Bio-Dome
This article seems to be about a play, a film, and an opera all at the same time without differentiating among them.  I don't know anything about the topic, but it should get fixed.-204.52.215.9 20:24, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Prayer of the Rollerboys

message: Nearly 20 years now since I've seen this movie, but for some reason it always stuck with me. I'm looking around for a copy of it (preferably DVD) but it seems pretty rare theses days. Anyway, most of this artcle seems to border line vandalism/substandard text. It just seems to be written more from a fan's point of veiw rather than an Encyclopdia article.
I realise that the fact this is an old and rare film there are'nt going to be many people who know a lot about it, but if there's a wikipedia buff out there who could check through it, I think it would make a decent article on a strange movie.
If I find another copy I'll watch it again and probly have a stab at the article myself - Elcaballooscuro (talk) 20:35, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest, the "Characters" section - which makes up the majority of the article - could be deleted out of hand. There's anothing about the film itself, as a film; it's described as an independent production, which is interesting, but there's nothing more about this. How much did it cost to make, who directed it, who wrote it etc? Beyond a bald list of credits there's nothing. The film is nowadays a byword for naffness, but there's nothing from contemporary reviews. Was it released to cinemas? I believe it was straight-to-video in the UK but it was covered by the press, otherwise I would not remember seeing reviews oti. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Gigapixel image

message: ?
perhaps not - note that the Gigapxl project referenced here, is  a gigapixel camera / image, 
but is not a gigpan.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.78.214.39 (talk) 07:45, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  put this article into [[gigapan]] 

message: Article said a gigapixel is more than 1000 times a megapixel. This is incorrect. How is 1,000,000,000 more than 1000 * 1,000,000? It's exactly the same. Edited to reflect this. 86.14.89.253 (talk) 15:36, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than 1000 times 

message: enWP is not a directory listing service, it is an encyclopaedia.  Please re-add only those that should be listed as per Wikipedia:External links. I believe that some of the links here are also on the blacklist and attempts were made to circumvent the list. Probably not the wisest move. — billinghurst sDrewth 15:45, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: Added a new section on terapixel, but this can easily take the place of the redirect. Should anyone think it be deleted altogether, just take a closer look here...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.252.212.113 (talk) 06:55, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Terapixel]] 
Talk:The Piano Teacher (film)

message: First sentence, final paragraph of the Plot section: what on earth does speculable mean?  I haven't been able to find a reference to it, even using Google... FromageTheDog (talk) 16:10, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's possible to find it using Google. It's the adjective form of the verb "speculate", that is, something that can be speculated. --Leonardo T. Oliveira (talk) 00:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculable? 

message: The Georg Friedrich link in the cast list takes you to a page of a German nobleman who died in 1603, I thought it a little strange that he should appear in The Piano Teacher several hundred years later.
Needless to say, I understand that there has been a mistake with the links, perhaps there is no entry for the actor and the Margrave of Brandenburg-Ansbach was the closest thing. I'm not sure how to fix it so I'll leave this comment here and a similar one on the Georg Friedrich entry and hopefully it can be sorted out!
Nothingbutmeat 07:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, obviously two different people! I've altered the link so that it points to Georg Friedrich (actor). Thanks Nothingbutmeat. --A bit iffy 08:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Georg Friedrich. 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Die Klavierspielerin which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 18:46, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: The paragraph does not speak to the plot but to the elements of the movie in an editorial fashion. Needs to be cut or edited to be part of a summary of the content of the film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tzigrrl (talk • contribs) 05:07, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd paragraph of plot section is not descriptive of the movie
Talk:Devil Girl from Mars

message: The plot summary was somewhat inaccurate, and looks like is had been plagiarised from another site. 
In addition someone had taken to inserting pointless "witty" editorialisation into the plot summary (e.g "impressively dressed", "somewhat wobbly robot" "Limited coaching", etc.) that made this read like a fan review. Would be nice if people didn't do that. Duckwalk71 (talk) 19:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections. 

message: I've just been watching FanboyFlicks' review of this film and the robot is definitely a person in a costume - absolutely nothing is automated, contrary to the article! 
There are no other robots in any stills on IMDB or movie posters, so I'm thinking this statement should be removed? I've not watched the entire film though so wanted to put the question out there first to see if anyone else knows more or can look up the citation (#7). Blue-Sonnet (talk) 07:56, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Automated" robot (aka bloke in a suit)
Talk:It Came from Beneath the Sea

message: I am currently waching a colour version of this film on the UK Sci-Fi channel. Has it been colourised or were the negatives filmed in colour originally and only now processed in colour?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.15.18.175 (talk) 18:27, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The original was made in black and white; the 2009 DVD version was digitally colorized.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.7.120.89 (talk) 19:40, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, colorized! This article should mention that. ALSO, it seems that color still shots of the sets and characters were distributed back during the 1950s, such as in posters and other ads!24.121.195.165 (talk) 18:09, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Colourised?
Talk:Project Moonbase

message: This line:
"The film is unusual for its time ... for depicting a future in which women hold positions of authority and responsibility equal to men, without drawing comment."
...is completely inaccurate. 
Heinlein's story is 1950s sexist white male reality in full swing. The female colonel, Briteis (pronounced "Bright eyes"), is only a colonel for the sake of appearances. The character is a whiny, impetuous housewife stereotype. In her first appearance, she refuses a mission when she finds out her co-pilot is an ex-boyfriend because, in her words, "the big lug hates me". Then, she falls victim to uncontrolled emotional outbursts and doesn't calm down until the general threatens to spank her. When things go wrong, Briteis (again, a colonel) turns into a shrieking violet. I'm convinced that Donna Martell was told that her character was the romantic lead in a western (just ignore the sets). What this role needed was someone more like Audrey Meadows of Honeymooners fame.
Heinlein created a character that is the epitome of everything feminists fight against. This movie may make inroads in technology, but there is nothing progressive about its views on women. Even the female president was delivered with a sense of irony.
Brienmalone 12:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexism in full swing 

message: Was this a feature film that premiered in theateres?
Of course not! It went straight to BluRay.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.219.79.135 (talk) 23:20, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Did this premire in theaters?

message: The last paragraph is a mixture of plot detail and personal opinion. Not that I disagree, the whole film is filled with misogyny and male chauvinism, but that shouldn't be included in a synopsis of the plot.68.6.234.179 (talk) 23:36, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Needs Rewriting

message: I'd rather take a damsel in distress trope than this trash. The US Space Force Colonel, commander of the first Moon mission, is actually threatened with a spanking by her superior officer.
Yeah, there is the President thing, but anything related to any of the protagonists is horrible. I added to the misleading paragraph, but please take a look and make improvements.  --91.5.106.161 (talk) 00:14, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worst Depiction of Gender Relations I've ever seen in a non-Porn Movie
Talk:First Men in the Moon (1964 film)

message: The selenite voices go uncredited, and are not mentioned in th article, nor on IMDB. Does anyone know who voiced them?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohdear15 (talk • contribs) 13:11, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Selenite Voices

message: The section on differences between the book and the movie is inaccurate. In the book, Bedford/Wells does express an interest in colonizing the moon, but the Supreme Lunar also expresses interest in colonizing the earth, and it is implied that the Selenites have the secret of Cavorite by the end. It is rather an afterthought, though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.141.116 (talk) 02:35, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Colonization

message: on the Secrect project forum they discussed why the Movie spacesuit are identical  to Windak 1962 Spacesuit
http://www.secretprojects.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,5714.15.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.66.163.212 (talk) 14:06, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This will need a reliable source--not an unsourced forum post on some conspiracy website... —Eekerz (t) 09:44, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: the Windak 1960 Spacesuit prototypes

message: This movie makes up a fairly significant portion of the Moon Landing film, is this not important enough to mention in the lead? Thespearthrower (talk) 17:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't the Lead Mention that This is Part of the Moon Landing People Saw?
Talk:Kronos (film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Has been done. Luigibob (talk) 19:21, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of "needs infobox" tag

message: * Does someone know where the atomic explosion's sequence comes from ?
* The magnetic card system device to open the lab door : is it the first time such a thing is at screen ?
* Why Irving Block has no article ?
-- Spiessens 12:21, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fascinating film...
Talk:Murphy's War

message: Who are the vigilantes in this film? During the Second World War, it portrays the (fictional) efforts of a Royal Navy rating to destroy a German submarine that has taken refuge in neutral Venezuela. The combatants are serving members of the armed forces of two countries at war. Who are the vigilantes? --Hors-la-loi (talk) 16:24, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: A vigilante film?
Talk:4D Man

message: When Scott goes to open door the sleazy bar the sound effect that indicates his power is 'on' plays and his hand goes through the door.  Much the same thing happens to the bar girl and he goes "No" repeatedly indicating he did not intend to age her.  The cut away to the police station four more deaths have reported, so she's clearly dead.  Later he implores Linda to kiss him even though the 4d sound effect is playing.  It stops just before the kiss and while they kiss she shoots him.  Then he leaves ranting about being invincible.  This subplot that he isn't quite in control of his power and some of the deaths may have been accidental then basically stops dead.--174.99.238.22 (talk) 08:00, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Control of power plot point
Talk:Earth vs. the Flying Saucers

message: It say the saucer effects were groundbreacking Since their is no souce, isnt this a weasel word  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.131.77.73 (talk) 06:35, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groundbreaking  

message: Loved the use of the mechanical differential analyser for translation purposes, particularly the fact that it output its results in script on a plotter! I'm not saying that it would be impossible but I think that they would have needed to use an immensely larger one than they did for such a task! -- Derek Ross | Talk 17:50, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The "plotter" was a teleautograph, a clever pantograph-based method for transmitting handwriting from a transmitter to a receiver. My guess is that these were extant in the 1940s, possibly into the 1950s. David Spector (talk) 14:52, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Differential Analyser

message: The crash involving 2 Curtiss SB2C Helldivers is an actual collision resulting in 4 fatalities. See . AMCKen (talk) 00:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Aircraft Shown

message: Marvin the Martian was first identified by name in the 1953 Warner Brothers cartoon Duck Dodgers in the 24½th Century.
In 1956, we have space scientist Dr Russell A. Marvin in Earth vs. the Flying Saucers. 
Could there be a possible direct influence here, or could there be a deeper cultural influence that brings both these characters to be 'Marvins'? What is it about the name 'Marvin' with 1950s spacey / sciency types?
By the 1980s, we get Marvin, The Paranoid Android, in Hitchhiker's Guide to The Galaxy - a further riff?
Igribbish (talk) 10:38, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marvin Nerds of the 1950s 
Talk:X: The Man with the X-ray Eyes

message: Marginbuu, I'm not going to bother getting into some kind of edit war with you regarding your assertion that the alternate ending, which by all written acounts I've found was unfilmed, was available to British viewers, but could you please find some citation so that it's not just you saying that you've seen an alternate version? -Fuzzy (talk) 12:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate Ending 

message: Later in life, Ray Milland was said to have regarded this film as second only to "Lost Weekend" in terms of his performance, and that these two films were the ones of which he was most proud.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.192.73 (talk) 23:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ray Milland 

message: "Xavier chooses to blind himself rather than see anything more." -- Does the movie actually show this, or is it simply strongly implied?  I saw the movie a couple of days ago and don't remember his actually removing his eyes. 64.53.191.77 (talk) 14:20, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The film is available for free at this link, so I just watched the ending again.  Milland's eyes are deep black as the scene progresses, and when the preacher quotes, "...pluck it out", Milland repeats the quote as if it were inspiring.  Then his hands cover his eyes as his head plunges downward, then lifts back upward into camera range.  For a brief moment Milland's face is seen and his eyes are no longer black – they are blood-red.  I'd say that's a very strong implication that the character has indeed plucked out his eyes.  OUR Wikipedia (not "mine")! Paine  09:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ending 

message: Was the creator of Cyclops of X-Men inspired by this movie? 93.144.189.243 (talk) 20:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The X-Men comic book was published first, so the film wouldn't have influenced the character's creation.  There doesn't seem to be anything on Google, either, but you could look for interviews with Stan Lee. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:47, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did it inspire the creation of Cyclops from X-Men?
Talk:The Valley of Gwangi

message: The pterosaur in Gwangi does not match fossil pterosaurs in that it has bat-like wings (multiple "fingers") rather than single "finger" wings. Usually sourced to the difficulty of maintainingg the wing membrane of the model with just one supporting "finger". One could speculate the pterosaurs in the Valley were isolated and had 65 million years of additional evolution. For the purposes of the film, the pterosaur had to fly like an eagle, swooping down, snatching and lifting prey, rather than soar like a condor or albatross as was the probable flight mode with a single "finger" wing (as the pterosaur in 1925's "Lost World"). Naaman Brown (talk) 12:49, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  bat winged pterosaur 

message: I have just seen several episodes where televisions appear, and they are not showing anything at all and are switched off.  I have yet to find an episode where this movie is showing on a television.  So "any time a television is shown" is outright wrong, and I am hard pressed to confirm that this movie appears at all.  There is of course no source cited for this statement that I can use to verify it. Uncle G (talk) 12:22, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Scarecrow and Mrs King'' 

message: The final credit in the movie is "Gwangi" and I suggest adding "Gwangi as himself" (or itself) to the cast. It's right there. The movie is downloadable at archive.org. Wastrel Way (talk) 02:11, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credits 
Talk:It! The Terror from Beyond Space

message: Do I detect a snarky tone in that review???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.67.104.4 (talk) 17:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I replaced the plot section - this is the original and the version on Monster island News was cut'n'pasted from here. As to it being "snarky" - it's a film review, isn't that the idea? --Oscar Bravo (talk) 12:55, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's not.  It isn't meant to be a film review, it's meant to be a plot outline.  As it stands it's bitchy, non-neutral, not objective, etc etc etc.  Going to have a go at cleaning it up. Greg1138 (talk) 05:41, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This article is missing a lot of information on the film's production and reception which should be added to the article. Because of the film's significance of spawning the Alien series there should also have information on the film's legacy added in a different section to the article as well.--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion and significance
Talk:Busted (film)

message: It says in the article that Corey Haim was fired by Corey Feldman from the film, because of Corey's drug addiction. According to an actual, real life friend of Corey Haim's, he quit midway through the film, when he found out that Corey Feldman included his former abuser, in the cast. 
https://www.facebook.com/greg.harrison.3958/posts/10154459111072456   --Splashen (talk) 21:23, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: On Corey Haim's Departure From Film
Talk:Blown Away (1993 film)

message: Can we find any way to expand this article's plot? Most movies on Wiki have full plots down to the end.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.203.4.246 (talk) 14:53, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This article doesn't need more plot, it needs a real plot, and everything else. GcT (talk) 17:32, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled