lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1885

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1885 is currently conforming to proposed general model
BUT the "fictional events" section has to go...
--BozMo 12:17, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 01:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: The link is clearly to a person who cannot have had an appendectomy in 1885. Probably should be clarified or the link dropped.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nashjc (talk • contribs) 20:25, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Mary Gartside
Talk:1884

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1884 is currently NOT conforming to proposed general model. The year in topic paragraph should be replaced by a "see also" box as in 1886 ff
--BozMo 12:17, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:1883

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1883 is NOT currently conforming to proposed general model. The year in topic paragraph should be replaced by a see also box as in 1886
--BozMo 12:17, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: F 2601:1C0:5300:B9C0:0:0:0:8584 (talk) 04:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panic of 1893
Talk:1881

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1881 is currently conforming to proposed general model. unlike 1882, 1883
--BozMo 13:44, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The following event is not supported by any references or any other entries within wikipedia Nigosh 05:01, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Events

message: could a native speaker bring that into the article, please ? --Neun-x (talk) 21:39, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Kingdom of Greece]] conquered [[Thessaly]] in 1881
Talk:Kensington (Olympia) station

message: Should this be at Kensington Olympia station? The station name only has brackets on the tube map, and since it is managed by Silverlink (who are the primary users) shouldn't the name be what they call (and National Rail call it) rather than what one of the minority users (LUL) call it? Thryduulf 23:47, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: article name

message: Should this section be deleted, or at least changed, since motorail no longer operates? Badgerific 11:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: motorail

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support. It seems likely that the brackets are there just because of the tube map. The common name would most probably omit them. No significant edit history at the target name, incidentally. Andrewa (talk) 18:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: This article, though written with some elegance and redundancy, is rather thin on history. The only mention of a date of opening is "1864" in the box. Borley & Kidner's "The West London Railway and the W.L.E.R." gives 27 May 1844 for the opening of Kensington station on the  north  south side of the Hammersmith Road. That seems to be near Kensington Olympia station. Is 1864 erroneous?--SilasW (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1844 "Kensington" station was open for only 6 months or so. Then in 1862 an "Addison Road" station opened to the north of Hammersmith Road, according to the London Rail Atlas, J, Brown (Ian Allan, 2009).  "Addison Road" station became "Kensington (Olympia)" in 1946 after a period of closure from 1940. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 12:54, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening date? 
Talk:1880

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1880 is NOT currently conforming to proposed general model. The year in topic paragraph should be replaced by a see also box as in 1881
--BozMo 12:17, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 01:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 
Talk:1878

message: A citation is needed on this statement, and I can't find anything definitive that proves or disproves it. The most detailed account I could find on my limited search was the following on pp 584 of Illustrated Universal History: Being a Clear and Concise History of All Nations By Israel Smith Clare (1880) which states that there was an incursion of 12,000 Greek troops, and the island of Crete was annexed. A few days later an armistice was agreed upon by Greece and Turkey, but the insurgents on Crete continued to carry their arms. So whether this was a declaraition of war... is undecided and I will let more informed individuals decide.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joma888 (talk • contribs) 05:04, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: [Greece Declares War on Turkey]

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1878 is NOT currently conforming to proposed general model. The year in topic paragraph should be replaced by a see also box as in 1886
--BozMo 13:54, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: 1876 gold $5 dollar peice worth 172.58.192.160 (talk) 10:15, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1876 gold $ 5 dollar peice worth
Talk:1877

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1877 is NOT currently conforming to proposed general model. The year in topic paragraph should be replaced by a "see also" box as in 1886
--BozMo 13:55, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: April 1 – Following years of murders of sharecroppers and U.S. army personnel by the former slave owners, the Reconstruction era of the U.S. ends when Union troops pull out of the South-Eastern American States. This leaves the former slaves at the mercy of their owners, and begins the Gilded Age when large businesses begin monopolization of the American economy. 
The claim This leaves the former slaves at the mercy of their owners, is unclear in what it means and questionable in it's accuracy. It needs either clarification or removal.  (comment by User:2603:6081:F600:98:68DA:639E:45EF:EC03) Joyous! Noise! 20:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment moved from article space
Talk:1875

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1875 is NOT currently conforming to proposed general model. The year in topic paragraph should be replaced by a see also box as in 1886
--BozMo 13:59, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 
Talk:1874

message: The year in topic layout on this page is one of three versions. I seek opinions before making them all the same; see comment on my talk page 
1874 is NOT currently conforming to proposed general model. The year in topic paragraph should be replaced by a see also box as in 1886
--BozMo 12:17, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The pages for 1884, Flag of Estonia and Estonian Students Society all state that the flag was consecrated in 1884, not 1874.
OsirisMuhammad (talk) 00:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estonian Flag Consecration on June 4 

message: 20th may is correct but the year was 1873 (http://www.google.com/patents/about?id=XnZNAAAAEBAJ&dq=139121)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.74.50.45 (talk) 11:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  jeans-patent
Talk:1946

message: I have put a general comment on year layout on my talk page, particularly on the way year by topic is dealt with. There are three different variants and I would like agreement to standardise. This would involve deleting the year by topic from the paragraph list on this page but keeping the box at the top --BozMo 14:05, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year by topic 

message: [See: Talk:1950#Format.  -Wikid77 12:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: Please note that Mensa International is an umbrella organisation for the national Mensas, which means that when there was only the one original Mensa there was no umbrella organisation. :) 192.137.163.5 (talk) 07:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Mensa International]]

message: Seeing as how this year was when the Baby Boom began, shouldn't there be a note of it? I believe more people were born this year (at least in the US) than any other, although the succeeding years might offer some competition. Brutannica (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: according to some sources, the period January 1 1946 to December 31 1946 is the most people ever born in 365 days, a Guinnes Record. ````  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.230.94.194 (talk) 15:02, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Some countries had much more marked post-WW2 baby booms than others; some didn't have one at all. It shouldn't be on this article, but should be on year by country articles of countries which had a marked baby boom, including 1946 in the United States. Jim Michael (talk) 22:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Mid-20th century baby boom]]
Talk:1949

message: I have put a general comment on year layout on my talk page, particularly on the way year by topic is dealt with. There are three different variants and I would like agreement to standardise. This would involve deleting the year by topic from the paragraph list on this page but keeping the box at the topBozMo(talk)
: [ See Talk:1950#Format.  -Wikid77 13:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: This page says the first Type 1 arrived 17 Jan. This page says it was 25 February. Which is it?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  18:30, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type 1 

message: Production for Walt Disney's Cinderella was finished by October 13, 1949.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.255.216.208 (talk) 17:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Walt Disney]]'s [[Cinderella]] 

message: …Is incorrect. No longer longest federal trial in US history. 2001:569:5813:2200:1891:79FA:B902:C998 (talk) 19:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foley Square Trial Info… 

message: what images should be on the 1949 collage. 4me689 (talk) 02:39, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Superga air disaster, Prüm explosion, and 1949 Kemi strike are not significant enough. I propose to replace them with 1949 Ambato earthquake, 1949 Khait earthquake, and implementation of the first law of racial segregation in South Africa: Prohibition of Mixed Marriages Act, 1949 Nagae Iku (talk) 09:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea 4me689 (talk) 12:34, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  collage
Talk:Prose

message: can you list the divisions of prose and a little definition to it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phil2011.13 (talk • contribs) 13:10, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  divisions of prose 

message: This article claims that "Some works of prose do contain traces of metrical structure or versification and a conscious blend of the two literature formats is known as prose poetry."  This is very far from any standard definition of prose poetry.  Much more to the point is the Wikipedia description that it is "poetry written in prose instead of using verse but preserving poetic qualities such as heightened imagery and emotional effects."  I think if this sentence at should be kept, it should be changed to better reflect a correct definition of prose poetry.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.119.235.95 (talk) 03:07, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prose Poetry 

message: Novels, essays, short stories, and works of criticism are examples of prose. Other examples include: comedy, drama, fable, fiction, folk tale, hagiography, legend, literature, myth, narrative, saga, science fiction, story, theme, tragedy.
This paragraph is bad. The problem is the identification of prose with what's called "literature". Many of the above forms (and how did "theme" get in there?) are not necessarily prose. The Odyssey is not prose but is folk tale, legend, literature, myth, narrative, saga and story. 
"Prose" is used most often in the context of big-el Literature because that's where a word meaning "not poetry written in meter" has most currency, and so I notice that the list leaves out in an apparently systematic way stuff like: news stories, letters, diaries, textbooks, judicial opinions, news tickers. It's possible to write pretty much anything in strict meter, so these forms don't call for prose as a matter of necessity either, but they're easily as prosaic as those given as examples in the above quote.
I'm cutting the paragraph. Genialimbecile (talk) 00:10, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evil Paragraph 

message: Bananasoldier (talk) 04:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  TAFI setup 
Talk:Erica arborea

message: Tree heath is a name applied to several species, including E arborea, E. lusitanica and E.  australis. The distribution given for the tree heath here , including Cameroun, suggests that several species are being described.
:My references state this as the natural range for Erica arborea specifically - MPF 12:48, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004

message: There should be a high-quality color photo of the smooth-sanded cross-grain of this wood in order to illustrate the decorative characteristics which cause it to be in demand for pipe-making.Tokerdesigner (talk) 21:59, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cross-section photo needed

message: Désamoré, A., Laenen, B., Devos, N., Popp, M., González-Mancebo, J. M., Carine, M. A. and Vanderpoorten, A. (2011), Out of Africa: north-westwards Pleistocene expansions of the heather Erica arborea. Journal of Biogeography, 38: 164–176. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02387.x  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.82.182.63 (talk) 20:57, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New study of Erica arborea biogeography
Talk:Composite data type

message: This is just wrong. These are NOT what C and C++ call composite types. A struct is what C calls an aggregate type. a composite type in C is a completely different type.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.35.35.34 (talk) 17:37, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

message: If nobody has any objections, I'm going to merge a big chunk of this article (the examples specific to C and C++) into the article struct (C programming language). I think this article has better language for the most part, but the other article covers a couple things this one doesn't. --Libertyernie2 (talk) 21:30, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move of (most of) the "C/C++ structures and classes" section into [[struct (C programming language)]]
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Lir

message: I notice that an anon has recently removed, without comment, Viajero's parenthetical inclusion of the name "Adam Rinkleff" from the article. It is generally considered tacky (at best) to edit someone else's signed remarks. (I have no idea whether this is indeed Lir's actual name or if it was in any way inappropriate to use it, just that an anon edit of someone else's remark seems unlikely to remedy things to general satisfaction.) -- Jmabel 17:16, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Osona

message: My Catalan encyclopaedia says that "Ausona" was the "Latin" name. Only this. May be the name was used in the old middle age when the only language used in the scripture was Latin, but today, speak about "Osona or Ausona" is like to say "Barcelona or Barcino" or "Spain or Hipania". I think that the sentence wasn't adequate. Llull 18:09, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I could find you a lot of references using the name "Ausona" well into the middle ages. Actually, a web search turns up quite a few, including referring to it this way precisely during the period where it was, in the narrow sense, a county (with a count). Check it out. -- Jmabel 20:49, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, in the middle ages I can find lots of references using Cathalunya, Catalaunia, Cathalaunia or Catalonia (in Catalan and Latin~texts), but these versions only are archaisms. I've tryied to include the word "Ausona" telling the origin of the name. Sorry, if I'm grotesque, bnut I have a survival English level, And yes, I wanted to say "Hispania" :p Llull 21:05, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading
Talk:List of Israeli newspapers

message: Why add these external links to each newspaper??? This should be a list of internal links, to the articles about each newspaper. Each article can include a link to the respective newspaper website - we don't need those external links in the list too!
Also, why add so many papers with red links? It would be better to list only existing articles, I think...
Nyh 18:28, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
File talk:Fgm map.gif

message: This map is not only pure BS. It's also based on shoddy statistics work. --Yellowfiver (talk) 00:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: So why isn't this image being reconsidered? --72.241.86.106 (talk) 01:41, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pure BS 

message: Why are there overlapping ranges? -- Mikeblas 01:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlap?
Talk:Staffordshire Bull Terrier

message: What happened to the Temperament section? 213.17.118.30 (talk) 00:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There hasn't been one for years. But this is covered in sections with other names. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   Temperament? 

message: regarding this  , are you sure that it's false that Staffordshires have killed people?   Geogene (talk) 20:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the source, and it's in there, so I restored it. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:41, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? Add the page # because I couldn't find it, and it is not a RS. So please add the page # where it clearly states that, and to what sources corroborated it. Thank you. Atsme 💬 📧 21:39, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's BBC News. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:10, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Fatal attacks

message: This breed came to pass in 1948 when the original SBT breed standard was changed by those in the show business via the English KC for smaller less athletic dogs. Sadly the old breed was never accepted and now allegedly classed as APBTs by the RSPCA even though they looked quite different and smaller. They are classified nowadays as the Irish Staffy as most are to be found on the emerald isle.
https://www.dogbreedinfo.com/irishstaffordshirebullterrierphotos.htm
https://petkeen.com/dog-breeds/irish-staffordshire-bull-terrier/ 88.97.39.126 (talk) 14:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither of those are reliable sources. No kennel club seems to recognise the breed from my search. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:03, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish Bull Terrier IBT or Irish Staffordshire Bull Terrier 

message: I can't speak to other countries but in New Zealand most mongrels/pit bull type dogs are registered as 'Staffordshire Bull Terrier' to avoid dangerous dog laws, the vast majority are not actually Staffies. So I'm wondering if this is true of other countries: if Staffordshire Bull Terrier is used to register banned/restricted dogs to get around the law. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popularity and Registrations.
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Committee/Archive/1

message: I have personally had conflict with fully 1/3rd of the mediation committe, in maybe the space of a week since creating Wikipedia:Requests for mediation. Two have called into question my abilities as an editor. Two have called into question if I may be a troll, and one committe member suggested on wikipedia:conflicts between users that insults might be accurate to use in describing me. I am not pleased. If I am so bad, ban me. If you are so bad, shape up. If you can't mediate or behave moderately, lets make some changes. Jack 08:32, 21 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whats going on?
Talk:Plains, Georgia

message: If you would like to know why I assessed the article the way I have, please use my talk page. Ethan (talk) 23:59, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: Something is off with the numbers. The text states that at the 2000 Census 637 lived in Plains the table records 283 population --FantinoFalco (talk) 07:43, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics
Talk:Paul Newman

message: what was the outcome of the 1987 lawsuit?
100.15.117.34 (talk) 15:00, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what you are referring to, but if indeed we talk about a lawsuit whose resolution is not available, we may want to omit. Commercial disputes are common and may not be notable. Coretheapple (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

text: The suit was actually filed in 1985 and was dismissed! I've taken it out. Thank you Mr. or Ms.  IP. Coretheapple (talk) 20:28, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  incomplete 

message: his father was not the son of immigrants from hungary, because there were no hungary, it was "Kaisertum Österreich". 2003:CA:A707:E100:54E6:91BC:9DA6:22D0 (talk) 12:04, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong 

message: in german language there exists no Newman, but Neumann. Newman ist the english translated version of the german family name Neumann. So imo his grandfather changed his name in this english version by immigrating in USA.
wiki: As of 2023 it is the 18th most common surname in Germany. 2003:CA:A707:E100:54E6:91BC:9DA6:22D0 (talk) 12:07, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newman = original: Neumann