Talk:MLB.com

message: There is an article for ESPN Gamecast, should there be one for GameDay on MLB.com.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Soxrock (talk • contribs) 25 July, 2006
:There is: GameDay (software).  VoL†ro/\/Force 01:28, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MLB GameDay 

message: I have restored the trivia section regarding the history of MLB.COM.  The origin of MLB.COM being owned by someone else is a valid item to be included in Wikipedia entry and it is not advertisement to any party.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Rgl168 (talk • contribs) 16:47, 27 September 2006
*And I have DELETED it again, as the only purpose of such "trivia" is advertising. Since you have nothing on your user page explaining who you are, that just raises further suspicions. Wahkeenah 17:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The history of the domain is just that - history. I've restored the edit, and will note that Wahkeenah has a history of being personally abusive and unco-operative - see his comments at Talk: The Sting. Note that Wikipedia discourages trivia, so I retitled it "History" as per WP:TRIVIA.  The item meets the standard of WP:VER and moreover is not indiscriminate information. It refers directly to the origin of the URL.Michael DoroshTalk 01:05, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted the blatant advertising again, and it is YOU that is abusive and uncooperative. To put it another way, I treat you the way you treat me. Wahkeenah 01:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. Put your spam back. I'll stop watching this page and you can win, again. I have had quite enough of you. Again. Wahkeenah 01:13, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Michael. Rgl168 13:56, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restored Trivia Section 

message: :Image:Logo mlb.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 05:23, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Logo mlb.PNG

message: they have recently made a new mlb.com Home Page and the pic neeeds changing. i dont no how to do it . sorry  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ben10027 (talk • contribs) 15:45, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mlb pic on the front  

message: Currently, the page says games starting before 1900 on Saturdays are blacked out starting with May 2006. Does anyone know the status for this yea regarding FOX conflict blackouts, and if so, could they please add it. I know it does not black out 1 PM games in the US as of today (April 12) but I'll have to wait until 3:55 to let you know about the actual FOX games. The Yankees-Red Sox will definently be black out for me as I am in the Yankees blackout region, but I will report on the Rockies-Diamondbacks. However, I have no idea what will happen in future weeks, so could someone who knows say so? Smartyllama (talk) 17:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FOX Blackout Policy 

message: I have added two new sections and expanded upon the services of MLB.tv.
A couple of things I would like opinions on:
*Price list: Couldn't find anything against it on WP:AD, but would like some consensus
*Use of word yearly in that price list... should it be annually?
*Is there any POV here? I have written both these sections myself and have tried to remain un-biased, but i'm worried about it sounding like an advertisment.
Josh 11:04, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MLB.tv sections 

message: Should we remove this section since it is no longer an offered service.  Perhaps replace it with the features which are available.76.202.136.8 (talk) 18:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MLB Mosaic