Talk:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1990 film)

message: I removed the line in the introductory paragraphs that stated "The film received mostly positive reviews," because as evidenced by the 46% on Rotten Tomatoes, it didn't receive mostly positive reviews.DaddyTwoFoot (talk) 20:51, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You might be correct that it didn't receive mostly positive reviews (I'm just saying it's possible... I don't know), but Rotten Tomatoes is not a good evidence of this. Reading over WP:MOSFILM, it's clear that the Critical Response section should emphasize the critical response at the time of the film's release. It also calls out the problem of review aggregation sites not providing this. The film came out in 1990. None of the Rotten Tomatoes reviews are from before the year 2000. --Elephanthunter (talk) 04:18, 8 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Mostly positive reviews

message: Doesn't the country house belong to Casey Jones' grandmother, and not April like the article insinuates?
Actually, I think I remember reading in the very first issue of the comic that it belonged to April's grandparents.  
: I think you are correct, but I'll find out for sure before I change it.PrometheusX303 07:10, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's April's.  She makes a few comments about how long it's been since she had been there.  Plus, she knows her way around (including the distance to the nearest neighbor), where Casey does not. --UsaSatsui 09:59, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  In the 2003 cartoon, the turtles frequent Casey's grandparents' farmhouse.  The house in the movie is not the same.  --Brandon Dilbeck 06:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yeah dont use the 2003 as a refrence though. I dont trust it. It's all about the original Turtles. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.167.52.195 (talk) 16:29, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks.  I no longer have a copy og the film, or I would have checked. Prometheus-X303- 06:43, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

text: It's never stated.  Though the gang robbing the van meets the description of the Foot (teenagers robbing electrical equipment), there's no definite connection.  --UsaSatsui 09:59, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Country house

message: I took out two of the four images in that section. Four is probably far too many to be considered fair-use in one section, and it was cutting up all the text and so on, and looked very cluttered. Davey4 12:00, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images in deleted scene section

message: I think we should try and shorten the plot section a little. As it is right now, its far too detailed. Davey4 05:13, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: I'm gonna delete the goofs section. I can't recall ever seeing a goof section in a movie article before, and it doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. DurinsBane87 09:34, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goofs 

message: Just because other articles have features doesn't mean they're good ones. We should be using FA movie articles as a reference, and Jaws (film) certainly doesn't have a goofs section OR a cast and crew section. DurinsBane87 18:41, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article standards 

message: The creatures were first made out of fiber glass, which were then rebuilt out of clay. I'm sure that should be the other way around but when I changed it it changed back, any thoughts? Oh also fiber should be fibre.--203.59.107.145 01:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Production

message: I have fixed the following inaccuracies in the plot summary:
* The film version of Casey Jones was an ex-hockey player, not a martial artist, and was not a "friend of the Turtles" at the beginning of the film; he didn't even know about them until he crossed paths with Raphael.  Having removed the incorrect "friend" reference, I have made alterations to the text in a few places to explain Casey's actual role in the film.
* Danny, the boy who tells Shredder that the Turtles are at April's, was not "related to April", he was the son of April's boss. - Pennyforth 19:14, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed inaccuracies 

message: :Image:Raph and Don Deleted.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:38, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Raph and Don Deleted.jpg

message: :Image:Non used ending.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 00:39, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Non used ending.jpg

message: Here's an interview Judith Hoag did with People Magazine following the release of the film. Sarujo (talk) 14:04, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  People 1990 article 

message: Current showings of this movie on ABC Family and on various movie channels have cut out two scenes
1) The scene in which the two kids who are visiting the Foot hideout are offered cigarettes - This I can understand as part of the movement to discourage kids from smoking.
and
2) The argument between April and Casey in which Casey gives April the message from Charles about being fired. - This I do not understand why it was cut, except possibly for time constraints.
Good thing I still have the original video. LReyome254 (talk) 01:14, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Showings on movie channels and ABC Family 

message: Someone has linked and identified the producer of this film to the concertmaster of the Metropolitan Opera.  I'm pretty sure these are two different David Chans.  Can anyone verify who is the David Chan who is one of the producers of this film?  kosboot (talk) 12:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, a quick glance at IMDB shows that it's an entirely different person.  The IP address 138.217.65.168 keeps wikifying it, but it is NOT the concertmaster of the Metropolitan Opera. kosboot (talk) 12:24, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Chan