lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fedora Commons

message: Which name should be the article's title ? The article's body uses "Fedora" and "FEDORA" while the official website http://www.fedora-commons.org uses "FedoraCommons" for its splash image, "Fedora Commons" for its web page title and SourceForge project name, "Fedora" in the documentation and when associated with a version number, "fedora-commons" in the URL and SourceForge project identifier. The older website uses "fedora", "FEDORA" and "Fedora Project". Since "Fedora Commons" seems to be the most used name for recent information, including http://www.fedora-commons.org/about, I will rename the article to "Fedora Commons" if no objection is raised. Nicolas1981 (talk) 16:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename to Fedora Commons ?

message: From,http://www.fedora-commons.org/about/history.php,
"When Red Hat, Inc. filed a trademark request for the name "Fedora" to be associated with their Linux operating system project in 2005, Cornell and UVA formally disputed the request. As a final settlement, all parties settled on a co-existence agreement that stated that the Cornell-UVA project could use the name when clearly associated with open source software for digital object repository systems and that Red Hat could use the name when it was clearly associated with open source computer operating systems. The transferable agreement stipulated that each project must display the following text on their web site:
Red Hat, Inc. offers open source computer software for operating
computer systems under the mark FEDORA Project. The FEDORA
Project of Cornell University and the University of Virginia is not
affiliated, connected, or associated with the FEDORA Project of Red Hat,
Inc. Red Hat, Inc. does not sponsor, approve of, or endorse the FEDORA
Project of Cornell University and the University of Virginia."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.173.124.219 (talk) 20:24, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  fedora name dispute 

message: Please consider providing content knowledge at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hydra (digital repository).  Thank you, Unscintillating (talk) 14:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD needing content knowledge
Talk:Rodent's Revenge

message: I remember a game just like Rodent's Revenge for DOS.  The letter "H" was instead of the cats.  Does anyone else remember such a game?   ---Adam
:I think you mean Beast. Icey 11:49, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar Game 

message: im going crazy with nostalgic thoughts  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 98.199.113.177 (talk) 08:21, August 21, 2007 (UTC) 
:Have you actually read the article? Especially the part under "External links"? Calvero2 10:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh...tried to download it and it's not there...even checked on the actual site.  Check it out. Should i remove the link? Matthew (talk) 18:30, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My bad.  My Stupid computer is...stupid. Never mind. Matthew (talk) 18:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  does any one know where i can download it
Talk:Kotlas

message: The original text was a blatant copyvio of http://www.kotlas.org/kotlas/. I have rewritten the text to avoid copyvio and provided the oroginal reference abakharev 22:56, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:National Communications System

message: *I put up Wikify and Neutrality tags because I'm not sure what other tags to use.  This article is taken without attribution from one of its sources.  http://tesp.ncs.gov/library/reports/ncs_fy2003.pdf  This is an NCS document about itself.  However, this is not a copyright violation because it is an original U.S. government work.  I had an analogous concern about Counterfeit Deterrence System (now deleted as copyright violation); the article there was written by an association of non-U.S. governments (hence probably copyrightable) about their work and in my view suspect as to POV.  When government agencies write about their own work, they tend to present it as necessary, desirable, a good use of money, respectful of civil liberties, more efficient than the private sector, properly independent of other bureaucracies, etc.  If Wikipedia uses those descriptions, the source should at least be noted, shouldn't it?  Schoen 23:03, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Article tagged

message: *This article does not scan well at all. [posted by Anon]
**Should now be improved, see changes below.--Wikiwriter706 20:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article readability

message: *I modified this article with content from the NCS website, wikified and edited.  All of this is public domain and encyclopedic style with npov.  I completely deleted the previous article, which was copied and pasted from a law, I think.  It still needs some rework by an expert, I think, and can be expanded somewhat.--Wikiwriter706 20:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Complete rewrite
Talk:Investment advisor

message: The parentheses in the following quote is not closed, and if it were closed the sentence without parentheses would read "Stockbrokers" and would have nested parentheses... bad form:
"Stock brokers (known as "registered representatives" under U.S. federal law and licensed in the various states are not necessarily (and normally are not) registered investment advisors."
No matter where you close the parentheses I can't figure out exactly what is intended. 21:38, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I propose to move the article from investment advisor to investment adviser.
Why you might ask? - Well, a quick survey of UK, US Australian and South African websites nearly all use the 'er rather than 'or.
Also the word derives from 'advice' which definately has an 'e' not an 'o'.
I presume in the US the terms are interchangeable therefore it shouldn't cause any great problems.  The US SEC - the official regulator - uses 'adviser' . -- Simon West 23:04, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick Google search returns 148,000,000 hits for "advisor" and only 46,000,000 for "adviser".  They are about tied for "investment advisor" versus "investment adviser", but the former still gets more hits. The move seems a bit hasty, given that your post is from only 2 days ago, and I don't think it was necessary, given that "advisor" is a correct spelling, and appears to be the more common one at that. - Gauge 02:52, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move

message: There should be something about conflicts of interest - e.g. where an advisor gets a financial reward for signing customers up to a particular managed fund. Due to negative publicity, I think in Australia it's become more standard (and expected) now for advisors to make some kind of acknowledgement of this when making recommendations. (Can't think of the word - not disclaimer...). Of course, this doesn't mean that are no longer ethical problems. --Singkong2005 01:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the UK, commission disclosure (which is probably the word you trying to think of) is mandatory. The commison paid on UTs and OEICs is pretty standard at 3% + 0.5%pa but other investments vary. Advisers have been criticised for recomending Endowments, which pay more commision but are less flexible and tax efficient investments, over more appropriate investments which pay less commission. Disclosure helps but abuse still goes on. In theory, customers who are inappropriately advised can claim for compensation but bad advice is almost impossible to prove when it is given verbally. --DanielRigal 10:05, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicts of interest
Talk:Epic Pinball

message: The key sequence was ESC B N, not PAUSE N B. Pressing B added a second ball. Pressing N was in response to the game asking whether or not to quit. Also, in some versions, instead of N another key could be pressed which allowed piloting the ball with the arrow keys. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Undeaf (talk • contribs) 01:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Easter eggs" 
Talk:List of districts of Lima

message: On a lot of articles about districts of Lima it states that Chilean invaders sacked and burned this district or that one. I am not dening that this is true but it does not need to be put on there because there are many other things that Lima has and they don't have to be constantly reminded about the war because it was over a hundred years ago. You don't see battles of the Mexican-American War being described in articles about cities of Mexico.
: I don't think you've read a lot of articles about Mexican places. Besides, the War of the Pacific is an important part of Peruvian history and not mentioning it would be absurd. --StarbucksFreak 03:18, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Frederick Kensett

message: I added a section on Kensett's monumental painting of Mount Washington from 1851.  The material is also in White Mountain art.  I'm open to discussion about such duplication of material.  I felt it added to the article, since this painting is so typical of Kensett's early work.  JJ 23:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have concerns about stating that Mount Washington from the Valley of Conway is in the collection of Wellesley College.  There is a continuing controversy about this, and, until resolved, I suggest the reference be deleted from the caption.  In the 1980 exhibition at UNH, The White Mountains: Place and Perceptions, it is stated, I believe correctly, that the Wellesley College painting is dated 1869, not 1851.  (When I viewed this painting at Wellesley college in the late 1990s, it was dated 1869.)  Also, I quote form the description in the catalog to the exhibition: "Kensett painted this exact replica of his famous view, now lost, which was engraved for the American Art Union in 1851."  If others have insight into this issue, or disagree with me, please respond here before adding ownership information to the caption.  JJ (talk) 13:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kensett's ''Mount Washington''
Talk:Riku Kiri

message: In an interview he stated that his powerlifting raw max bench was 665.8lbs - so im questioning the valididty of 600lbs for 6 reps. 
--
StrengthCoach 23:27, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of aircraft engines

message: I am puzzled why there are citations next to blue links (direct links, not redirects)? Surely they are not needed? Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 12:00, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations for blue links? 

message: The link for citation #12 is broken - it appears the site's archival system may have updated it to the following:
https://www.flightglobal.com/agilis-takes-the-covers-off-higher-thrust-engine-/38031.article 140.32.183.249 (talk) 13:12, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link
Talk:Exoglossum maxillingua

message: First time page maker any advice on how to make better pages would be appreciated
--Isaac Read Masters 23:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Jeff Beukeboom

message: :He wore #23 for the Rangers. --jsum 16:50, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: what number was jeff when he played on the rangers?

message: Article reads as though it is written by Beukeboom's fan club. Peacock/weasle terms should be avoided, and more footnotes are needed to improve this article. Unsourced info will be removed per WP:BLP. Dolovis (talk) 20:05, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality
Talk:Rabbit Redux

message: Someone familiar with this book could finish the merge from "Rabbit redux" (missing capital "R"). Thanks Chris the speller 23:32, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup after merge

message: title of novel : Rabbit Redux
cover image of novel fair use : ?
image caption to give edition details : ?
author of novel : John Updike
country of publication : USA
language of original novel : English
illustrator for novel : ?
cover artist name for novel : ?
novel genre : drama
publisher for novel : Penguin (although first published by Ballantine Books in 1971
dd month yyyy : ?? ?? 1971
Print (~binding~) : ?
pagecount pp (~binding~ edition)~
ISBN ~999999999~ (~hardcover~ edition)~ : I have the softback edition...
prior book in series if relevant : Rabbit Run
subsequent book in series if relevant : Rabbit At Rest, Licks of Love (short story : Rabbit Remembered)
I am not sure all of this info is highly important, but I just thought I'd do my job...Also, I obviously don't know how to insert the box thing.Zigzig20s 18:08, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries, I've added the infobox as well as an image.  It took some time for me to get to it, as well as all of the other "Rabbit" novels.  Phew.  If you still need some help with infoboxes, Zigzig, just get in touch.  I'm willing to share the love. :) María: (habla ~ cosas)  03:32, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Scot Mendelson

message: "Mendelson is an New York University (NYU) graduate with a 3.893 gpa in Astro Physics and Newtonian studies." - really cant find any info on this on the web? StrengthCoach 23:37, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please note that the copyright tag for magazine covers explicitly does not allow them to be used simply to illustrate their subject. They must be used only in a context talking about the specific publication of the image. So the current use in this article is subject to deletion; someone needs to write specifically and in detail about his appearance on the cover, and not just "this is him on the cover" either. If we can't do that, the pic will be deleted by someone. 81.158.3.3 10:33, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mag cover 
Talk:Rule in Shelley's Case

message: An example would be extremely helpful for this article to explain the rule, how it worked, and how it works now that it has been abolished.--Mason13a 23:38, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Additions

message: As you can see, a major revision of this article with sources and problems in under way.  Please let me know what you think of it.  I intend to make the above these three changes in the course of the next two weeks.  
Here are some of the reasons I removed the pre-March 2008 content.  The constant reminders of the uselessness of the Rule are only opinion, but as opinion they could be cited to very authoritative writers.  The truth, however, is that the relevance of the rule remains unclear in many jurisdictions.  In theory the Rule in Shelley's case can still have consequences for a property or trust lawyer.  
It is also difficult for anyone to maintain a position that something is useless when it could mean the difference between an B and a B+ on a law school exam.  It is no help to a young law student looking for help on a curious point of law to find only a complaint about its difficulty, and no illustration.  An article of this nature also tends to enforce the impression that lawyers nurture impractical intellectual doctrines for their own sake, when in practice, understanding the Rule in Shelley's Case  works in tandem with and can illuminate several highly relevant principles of property law--for example, the nature of the term "heirs" as words of limitation, not words of purchase.  
Finally, there is no reason why an article about a doctrine that, however odd, can and must be applied with mathematical precision, should not have a few elementary illustrations. 
That said, it may always be a confusing article.  The Rule in Shelley's Case is really confusing unless studied in conjunction with broader principles of the law of future interests. Theprovost (talk) 04:26, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Change in Tone, Citation to Legal Authority, Illustrations
Talk:Marouf al-Bakhit

message: Re this: it's really not clear whether this WP page copies  or the other way around. The content was added here in 2006 without a source () and it's clear that the ILE page has at least been updated since then, as it refers to events in 2007. If anyone's confident that the text was copied from WP, I have no objections to it being restored. --Mkativerata (talk) 20:22, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible copyvio

message: Is there really no other useful information on this fellow? Hpelgrift (talk) 17:03, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is it? 

message: The year, month, and day are all in question.
For year, the current page says 1947, but this website says 1945.
Currently the Wikipedia page has March 18th, 1947 as his birthday. On Google if you search his birthday, it gives September 20th, 1947. Not sure where they source their data from.
toobigtokale (talk) 18:46, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was he born?
Talk:East Lancashire line

message: What color is this line and what rail system does it belong to?? Georgia guy 23:43, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Does anyone know the pattern of services which used to run on the Skipton to Colne line? I suspect that all local stopping services terminated at Colne and the only trains that continued through Colne were long-distance services. I could be wrong.  But if I am right, I think the diagram should not depict the stations beyond Colne as they were never considered part of the East Lancs Line. (These stations are depicted in the Leeds and Bradford Extension Railway article.) --Dr Greg (talk) 13:05, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The dismantled Skipton to Colne line 
Talk:Underground Atlanta

message: What is the difficuly history?  Please explain.
Atlanta residents, I think, have viewed Underground as an over-hyped, touristy, somewhat dangerious place (at least, for the last 20 years or so).  Various groups have attempted to reenergize the space from time to time, usually without much positive effect.  I think that people are still overcoming their distrust of downtown in general, and Underground is part of that.  Now the place has a kind of stigma attached to it.
Secretagentwang 17:06, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Downtown shifts very rapidly from being OK this is pretty nice to my god I'm going to get robbed. The underground is in the gonna get robbed part. Jcforge (talk) 19:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: difficult history?

message: Here I found an article pertaining to this subject: Battery firm hired to work on Underground Atlanta Rjluna2 (talk) 13:59, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A firm hired to work on Underground Atlanta 

message: Here I found an older article pertaining to this subject: Underground Atlanta talks continue despite missed sale deadline Rjluna2 (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Underground talks continue amid missed sale deadline 

message: Here is an article from Bill Torpy's Will seemingly dead Underground Atlanta ever breathe new life? from Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Rjluna2 (talk) 14:34, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Will seemingly dead Underground Atlanta ever breathe new life?
Talk:Garajonay National Park

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Roque Agando, Parque nacional de Garajonay, La Gomera, España, 2012-12-14, DD 01.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on March 27, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-03-27. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:20, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Roque Agando, Parque nacional de Garajonay, La Gomera, España, 2012-12-14, DD 01.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: According to es:Leyenda de Gara y Jonay (Legend of Gara and Jonay), the earliest recorded version of the purported Guanche legend was published in a newspaper in 1924, and the article also speaks of doubt cast on the authenticity of this legend. -Corsican Warrah (talk to me) 16:55, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibility of Garajonay legend being fakelore
Talk:Personal space

message: ::What about "multiple personal spaces"... I mean, can people's personal bubbles overlap as long as the people don't enter the bubbles themselves?  also, in the diagram, the distances indicated, are they radius or diameter? - 10:46, 5 February 2007 User:193.62.44.254 (Talk) (→Image) 
:::Good point about radius, it's explained more in the proxemics article.  The first part of your question I don't really understand? --Sadi Carnot 04:09, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To address your first question, yes, as illustrated in an image further down the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.250.166.139 (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: The article mentions that perceptions of personal space differ between cultures and circumstances, I think mention should be made of cultures which don't have a concept of personal space.  I live in southern Africa, in some parts of Zimbabwe and South Africa people will press up against you in a queue even if there are only two people in it, or stand right next to you on an empty street.  I questioned this at first and people were baffled (or affronted) by the idea that I didn't want others standing so close that we were touching.  This is more true of rural areas, so I don't think crowding due to urbanization is the cause.  Disconcerting for those who are not used to it. 196.210.216.116 (talk) 17:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: True, it says in the article some people may dehumanize people near them in crowded places  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.250.166.139 (talk) 00:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Culture
Talk:Koshi Tappu Wildlife Reserve

message: You removed all edits on koshi tappu Wildlife reserve which all were true and certified. So please don't undo it .it's for truthfullness of content. 27.34.12.61 (talk) 10:13, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disgusting Removal