lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pliers

message: Wow, I had no idea the request would be fulfilled so quickly. Good job guys, not I'll have to come up with a picture :) Dori | Talk 23:09, Mar 31, 2004 (UTC)
:I took a picture of the cleanest pair I had, but it's still not that good so if someone can find a better pic please do so. Dori | Talk 23:19, Mar 31, 2004 (UTC)
Not sure why theres a pic of needle nose pliers on the pliers page and not on the needle nose pliers page. I'll just copy it over.
KeepOnTruckin 15:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not? I've never heard of this kind, but pliers specifically made for turing bolts would be great for me. KeepOnTruckin 00:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old discussions

message: Finally found a page I could link to: http://www.mtechnologies.com/tools/ shows the actual difference between needle-nose and long-nose pliers.  Because it's a commercial site, I can't use it as a reference in the article.  I will however refer to it in this discussion about the article, since people have been continuously fighting against the expansion of knowledge in the article.Tom strom (talk) 10:22, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been undoing your edits because you haven't been supplying reliable sources. It has nothing to do with how old or new the reference is. Please use a book, newspaper, journal, or reliable website to reference your information. It has nothing to do with "dumbing down" the page. Wizard191 (talk) 14:16, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Long-nose pliers

message: This is a good article. In the DESIGN section, a short descriptive addition needs to be made about reverse action pliers, which are the kind where the jaws spread apart instead of coming together when the handles are squeezed. They are a required standard tool used for removing the snap rings (circlips) and roller chain master link retaining clips encountered in a great variety of modern machines, including most automobile engines and transmission gear boxes, motorcycle drive chains, and automotive differential gear axle assemblies. Something like:
"Some applications require pliers of a reverse design where the jaws move apart instead of coming together when the handles are squeezed in the normal fashion. Applications where this kind of reverse plier are needed are those where a great deal of force is needed to push things apart, such as opening circular snap rings to remove them from the annular grooves they rest in on shafts, spreading piston rings to remove them from automobile engine pistons, and removing roller chain master link retaining clips, to name just a few." Linstrum (talk) 08:23, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverse action pliers i.e. circlip pliers.  

message: There's an image of combination pliers, but no explanation of why they are called that. What's being combined? (Peter Jedicke (talk) 04:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combination pliers 

message: Chbf 186.179.163.120 (talk) 01:56, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pliers
Wikipedia talk:Popular pages (historical)

message: Here's the script I use on the full list available from http://wikimedia.org/stats/en.wikipedia.org/
awk ' ($5 !~ /:/ && $1>10000 && $5 ~ /\/wiki\//) {sub(/\/wiki\//,"",$5);gsub(/_
/," ", $5);print "*",$1,""$5""} ' url_200403.html
--Imran 23:41, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: The script

message: Solar System/Solar system and Solar energy/solar power pop up differently but go to the same place. It would seem the script should combine these if possible. Just a thought. Mrshaba (talk) 17:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Doubles

message: Why is this always at or near the top? In the past I've guessed at some kind of virus useing the article to check it can conntect to the web but it's being going on for so long. Anyone got any better ideas?©Geni 01:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The line for The Beatles is now commented out as long as the numbers are that ridiculous high. This has to be considered as traffic spam; see also User_talk:Numbo3-bot#The_Beatles for more information. --- Kind regards, Numbo3 (talk) 22:31, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Beatles

message: Can anyone tell me why the Popular Pages were deactivated? Opses0 (talk) 01:42, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was because it was usually not an accurate representation of the actual number of visitors that articles were getting. For instance, The Beatles was almost always the number one article, with double or more the number of views when compared to the second place article, due to traffic spam. Gary King (talk · scripts) 18:39, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for Popular Pages being deactivated

message: * please see User:West.andrew.g/Popular pages.--Milowent • hasspoken 13:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: *An additional follow-on report is now available at Wikipedia:5000/Top25Report.--Milowent • hasspoken 14:43, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New top page reporting service 

message: Attention:
Since the 16 March 2017‎ update, article talk pages that are tagged under parent projects for example : WikiProject Caribbean |Haiti=yes opposed to simply WikiProject Haiti are no longer included in the list as well as other projects such as Argentina (South America |Argentina=yes). You will notice a considerable difference in Haiti's before list: , as well as its after  as well as Argentina's   to show that it isn't just one project and could be the same across the board. Thanks to whom it may concern. Savvyjack23 (talk) 20:25, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reporting possible error
Talk:Ticker symbol

message: Concerning the following passage:
For instance, more people knew the Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company by the way its three-letter ticker ("MMM") is pronounced on Wall Street, "3M," leading to an official name change in 2002.'
The 3M corporate history pages show that "3M" or "Three M" was a name used by the company from the earliest days; see the logos at:
http://www.3m.com/about3m/history/1900.jhtml
http://www.3m.com/about3m/history/1910.jhtml
http://www.3m.com/about3m/history/1920.jhtml
http://www.3m.com/about3m/history/1930.jhtml
But 3M was not publicly traded until 1946, per:
http://www.3m.com/about3m/history/1940.jhtml
Thus, the common name 3M preceded the stock ticker symbol MMM.
:I removed the influence section because it lacks plausibility, unless the writer can provide sources.Jezzerk 15:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 3M

message: This article could be moved to Ticker symbol. Non-stock securities and derivatives can have ticker symbols, notably registered mutual funds, ETFs, and some options. Exchanges may also assign tickers to indices.
: Then some explanation of the word 'ticker' needs to be given.119.142.152.8 (talk) 03:10, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Ticker symbol

message: Anybody has information on technical details, such as accepted characters for ticker symbols, minimum length (should be 1, since there are some that are 1 character) and maximum length?  Pointing to a standard would be great.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deragon (talk • contribs) 18:20, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Technical details needed

message: you can search in google and many stock market websites with this id: "BME:IBE" for iberdrola in spain market ibex35. Do these ids follow some kind of regulation or standard?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.126.240.2 (talk) 06:46, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about stock symbols like MARKET + ":" + stock Identifier like "NYSE:WM" or "NASDAQ:BDE" and so on 

message: Something could be said about trader confusion with examples such as:
* Elon Musk tweeted "Use Signal" and Signal Advance's (SIGL) price surged.
* In the GameStop short squeeze, AMC Theaters (AMC) surged but also AMC Networks (AMCX). GameStop (GME) surged but also GME Resources (GME in Australia).
Or are these cases related to names rather than symbols?
--Error (talk) 09:10, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: In edit 1077577960 I also removed "basically" in the second sentence. Just a quick note as I accidentally tagged it as a minor edit because I also made the capital "T" a lowercase. Urban Versis 32 (talk) 01:38, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 1077577960 

message: I think the "shares" in the first line of the article direct you to the wrong kind of "stocks"... 
This, to be exact: Stocks. Shouldn't it be Stock or Share (finance)? 83.23.8.254 (talk) 11:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link?
Talk:Plain of Jars

message: "They can weight up to 14 tons (more than 6 metric tons)"  A metric ton is a "tonne" and 14 ton is about 15 tonne, not 6!
:: Yes, and we should probably use metric as standard, since Laos (and indeed nearly the entire world except for two countries) uses metric. I'll make the changes now...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.143.76.26 (talk) 23:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weights and measures 

message: I noticed there was no geotagging at the top of the article. I don't know the ropes of adding linkable coordinates, but if someone else feels up to it, these are the coordinates for Site 1:
 19°25'49.48"N, 103° 9'18.01"E
If someone feels up to adding these to the article using appropriate templates, feel free to do so!
Wilma Sweden (talk) 19:39, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geotagging Plain of Jars 

message: The Plain of Jars was introduced to me by a book called Shooting at the Moon by Roger Warner. It
is quite a great piece of literature.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Area51 director (talk • contribs) 00:30, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shooting at the Moon 

message: The  plain statement they were Mon-Khmer  is removed. There were Mon-Khmer, Malayo-Polynesian  and other communities in ancient Laos.  At the moment, it seems not clear who the people were.
A. Post-Muller (talk) 13:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnicity ? 

message: The information about UXO Lao seems weird, and contrary to what I've read at the website and the UNDP website. Perhaps the statements made could be cited.
UXO Laos website - http://www.uxolao.org/uxolao%20partners.html
UNDP Crisis Prevention and Recovery in Laos - http://www.undplao.org/whatwedo/crisisprev.php
~ Luminece  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.83.120.11 (talk) 13:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UXO Lao 

message: Plain of Jars is a Great Circle Navigation Archeology Site, it is in alignment with Newgrange Ireland, and Machu Picchu Peru.
Jars are probably observatories to study the stars, like a pinhole telescope, aimed at specific sections of the night sky, making Plain of Jars an Archeoastronomy site.
See ... Great Circle Navigation Archaeology
Example 19
Plain of Jars Laos
 
Newgrange Ireland, Machu Picchu Peru, Plain of Jars Laos
https://goo.gl/maps/gbYtSoxMsDovreqW7   …   map
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QPCrnLs0NZxL3AeKnVyFOHweay7oJ7ev
https://drive.google.com/file/d/192BKxJOJpXdGcU7q3zVQSTpk4UMn1XfB
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QWeLQJ2aLqjm8dpPj1WGy_HRRvaDotdW
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uQCzfaxSz6EspjydvH8XT9tBJRYzwZ2l
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1lU3lTtPlO-9SAPkBA3FkSIVI7CbkTQyA
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zc-33fFcEigXncfuApLUyaA6ANRJFDhksMohilFknQ8/edit ... Great Circle Navigation Archaeology
SteveBenassi (talk) 20:43, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plain of Jars is a Great Circle Navigation Archaeology Site
Talk:Wessex Constitutional Convention

message: Sorry, Everyking, I had to revert your last edit, as it gave the impression that Alan Whitehead chaired the Wessex Constitutional Convention, rather than the continuing commission on the South.
:Oh, I see, thank you for correcting that. Everyking 00:37, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: The notability  of this organization is currently unclear, since no secondary sources are cited. By the notability criteria for organizations, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. These sources might be press coverage about the convention, or books in which the convention is mentioned. The sources may, but need not, be available online; it is however important that they are explicitely cited.
For the time being, I am replacing the “importance” tag with “notability”. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 18:54, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I had no luck finding sources for the article, I'm adding a template for the UK Politics wikiproject to the page in the hopes that someone from there will swing by possibly and give the article some much-needed help. raven1977 (talk) 07:52, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability
Talk:WNNX

message: Go to the "Discuss this page" section of the main Atlanta FM radio stations page. According to the rules mentioned there, this station is commonly identified by a name that is a misnomer. Therefore, this station needs its own basic and advanced characteristics. 66.245.30.189 00:50, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: The call signs for WWWQ and WNNX were mutually swapped by the owner and appear on the official FCC web site on 29 January 2008 (referenced). I move the admin revert to the edit on Revision as of 21:48, 29 January 2008 by User "1690khz" since the Wiki article tracks the WNNX call sign.
:You're right, but you can't just swap the content of two articles.  That's called a cut-and-paste move, outlined here: WP:CPMV.  The correct method is to have admins move the pages entirely, so as to preserve the edit histories of both articles.  I put in the request - you can re-add the content that you added once the moves are finished. -- ChrisB (talk) 22:08, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm reading your post again, and I'm baffled.  Both of these articles actively follow the history of the frequency, not the callsign.  (The 99.7 article in particular.)  If we want to change that, it's something that should be discussed by the wider group, not a decision made by one user.  There is no overriding consensus on Wikipedia that articles should follow callsigns.  I'd readily argue that the opposite was true - if the articles follow the callsign, then why does the infobox template have a "former callsigns" label? -- ChrisB (talk) 00:31, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official WNNX/WWWQ Call Sign Swap on 29 January 2008 
Talk:Lyme disease

message: — Assignment last updated by Nicoleschully (talk) 19:17, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Health Psychology

message: — Assignment last updated by Jason.DeLaCruz1313 (talk) 00:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Microbiology of College Life

message: Now the article contains contradictory statements regarding the neuropsychiatric aspect of the topic, and that needs to be resolved by discussing it here. More experienced editors can examine the issue and determine if the new content supersedes the older, in which case, the older content will likely be deleted. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 20:58, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Valjean Reverted the new material and replied above. ScienceFlyer (talk) 22:55, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory info about neuropsychiatric symptoms 

message: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erythema_migrans is a messy article. Because this is related, does anyone else want to edit the page or merge parts of it? I'm not capable W;ChangingUsername (talk) 09:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erythema migrans page
Talk:Media coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict

message: The word desemanticization should link to Wiktionary, and not to Wikipedia's "Semantics" (which does not include the word). desemanticization IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 06:13, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Cannot agree more. Though it's already done at the moment. Colaheed777 (talk) 10:05, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested edit(s) 

message: * Wikipedia coverage of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict
---Another Believer (Talk) 22:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Then I suggest moving the whole Wikipedia section there. Opinions? Colaheed777 (talk) 10:11, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New related page 

message: Given the focus of this section has been CAMERA, I haven't previously considered this aspect in as much detail. It was previously unsourced in the article but I've found a secondary source for it, "Arab Lobby in the United States Handbook" on page 162. I can't find much on the publisher, but I'm seeing WP:USEBYOTHERS that suggests the handbook might be a decent source.
I also haven't found any discussion of Palestine Media Watch as RSN - only a single mention that appears factually inaccurate by a banned editor.
With that said, looking at the content again it doesn't seem to explain anything to the reader; what do these questions mean? Why are they relevant? Unless additional context can be provided, I have no objection to removing that paragraph. BilledMammal (talk) 04:27, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: PMW

message: * What I think should be changed (format using ): 
* Why it should be changed: It links the article back to itself and thus is redundant.
* References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
Kuomalainen (talk) 18:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Liu1126 (talk) 18:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 3 April 2024
Wikipedia talk:September 11 victims

message: Copied from my talk page, discussing a different policy but IMO very relevant to this one Andrewa 22:02, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Now, how do we get it adopted? Can we label it as a draft, and quote it right now as the draft policy?
Wikipedia policies become more "official" as people agree with them, link to them and call them policy, and less official as people disagree with them, and edit them to insert "not policy" qualifiers. There's no hard-and-fast seperation. Martin 13:04, 9 Apr 2004 (UTC)

text: Hmmmm. Then I might have a go at removing the "draft" notice in a week or so, assuming nobody objects to its going within that time, and reducing the tone of the internal disclaimers as well. Andrewa 06:49, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Andrewa 03:58, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  policies and guidelines 

message: The proposed policy page seemed to imply that some people wanted special treatment for 9/11 victims. As far as I am aware, this is not true. I think that maybe the common perception that it is true is the source of most of the disagreement. I have rewritten the page to say this. -- Oliver P. 19:26, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Pig War (1859)

message: There are not a lot of sources that spend much time on the actual details of the German arbitration that settled the dispute, however, I have found such a source, which perhaps someone could incorporate (perhaps me, at some later date, but I invite anyone else to inquire within). Tunem, Arthur J., "Dispute over the San Juan Island water boundary." U. Montana, 1931., pp. 47-54. [Link] 
An interesting detail discussed is that the American representative to the arbitration was able to provide numerous examples of British authorities recognizing the Haro Strait as the ostensible border, and that no available British or American maps of the time of the previous treaty even marked the Rosario Strait. Britain's evidence was markedly weaker and mostly based on popular conceptions among various British. Keith D. Tyler ¶ 08:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A source on the particulars of the German arbitration 

message: I have some notes about this citation:
*
There are so many issues that I am detailing them here before I fix all of them.
#The citation is duplicated when it should have been consolidated with a named footnote.
#The absence of |url-status=live causes the template to assume it is a dead link when it is live.
#The url, archive-url, & doi all point to a "A prospectus for their proposed four-volume history" & not the actual work.
#According to Amazon, the ISBN points to , not Vol. II. I could not find the ISBN at Worldcat.
#The oclc parameter, , does point at the correct multi-volume set. When I drill down on the HathiTrust Digital Library, Full view, open Full view   v.2, then take a look at the title page, only Frederic William Howay is listed as an author, not Scholefield.
#Finally, no page number is listed for the second use of the citation.
I intend to correct this with the following:
Peaceray (talk) 19:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Since we now have a sources section, I will start using  & moving the full citations for the books into it since these are often longer than the other footnotes. Peaceray (talk) 19:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with the ''British Columbia: From the Earliest Times to the Present''. Vol. II citation 

message: :Since we now have a sources section, I will start using  & moving the full citations for the books into it since these are often longer than the other footnotes. Peaceray (talk) 19:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Full citations of other books
Talk:Rímur

message: dic def. Move to Wiktionary. - UtherSRG 14:01, 25 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: From Vfd

message: I understand the motives of this inclusion, but there are thousands of superior quality examples of rimur in existence, this horrifically bad recording of an otherwise aurally offensive piece of a capella is a horrendous introduction, let alone example, of rimur. Can we not find something slightly less terrible? .__. BaSH PR0MPT (talk) 12:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: * I included a new link yesterday to the rímur section of the Ísmús website, which is a huge online repository of historical rímur recordings. Navigation might be a bit confusing at first for non-Icelandic speakers, so I added instructions today on how to access these recordings without learning Icelandic first. --Sylgja (talk) 13:12, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Numa rimur extract.ogg
Talk:Totally real number field

message: Is a totally real field always Galois over Q? The typical example for a non-Galois field that comes to my mind is Q(n-th root of 2), n>2 , which is not totally real. --Roentgenium111 (talk) 20:57, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, just find an irreducible cubic polynomial f with real roots but whose Galois group is S3, so the splitting field of f will have degree 6, but adjoining one of its roots to Q will give a field of degree 3.  An example of such a polynomial is f(X) = X3 − 4X+1. Chenxlee (talk) 13:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galois?