Talk:Collegiality

message: I tried to fix the link to the German version "Kollegialität" instead of "Mitarbeiter", however cannot save.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ombart (talk • contribs) 09:37, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

message: I remember that right after Watergate that some group (I believe it was the Brookings Institution) wrote a book saying that the presidential cabinet should have more collegiality. How might that operate? Sarsaparilla (talk) 18:16, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Collegiality among cabinet members

message: The sidebar says: "This article is part of a series on the politics and government of Ancient Rome."  The dates given as covered by the series are from 753 "BC" [Before Christ] to "AD" 476 [Anno Domini (the Year of Our Lord)].  Except for the 96-year period after the year 380, <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity#End_of_Roman_persecution_under_Emperor_Constantine_.28313_AD.29> however, Christianity either did not yet exist or, after it came into existence, had no official role in Roman history. 
Besides those facts, it is also true that the history of Rome is important to the whole world, not just to Christianity.  Therefore, in accordance with modern sensibilities, beautifully articulated by Kofi Annan <Annan, Kofi A., (then Secretary-General of the United Nations) (28 June 1999). "Common values for a common era: Even as we cherish our diversity, we need to discover our shared values". Civilization: The Magazine of the Library of Congress> and quoted in section 2.1 of the Wikipedia article "Common Era," <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Era> these dates should be changed from "BC" to "BCE" (Before the Common Era) and from "AD" to "CE" (Common Era).  
English is the most widely used language in the world, with hundreds of millions of persons of varying beliefs using it as a second language.  Except in articles about Christianity, therefore, all dates in the English version of Wikipedia should be expressed using the non sectarian abbreviations "BCE" and "CE."  Wikifan2744 (talk) 22:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: "Non sectarian"?!  BC is "non-sectarian" enough for me. The extra E added on for me is nothing more than a big glaring flag of the writers' sympathies, and in truth that is more like sectarianism. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 15:42, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

text: I don't think as many people really care what Kofi Annan says as you wish they would! Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 13:14, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  BC/AD versus BCE/CE 

message: In light of the increasing role of Collegiality in the Catholic Church from Vatican II to Pope Francis, and the controversies surrounding that change, I plan to substantially enlarge that section.  When I'm done, the article will probably look quite unbalanced.
If anyone feels such imbalance would be inappropriate, I'd be happy to put the expanded section in a new article with appropriate links between the two articles.  --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 15:26, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've done a first try at redoing that section, with solid sources this time.  It doesn't look all that long so I'll let it sit for a while to see if someone wants me to move it.  Personally, I'd like a separate article, but it would be awfully small as it stands. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 01:18, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: After thinking if over, I've decided to move most of the section to Collegiality (Catholic Church), where I could establish appropriate links and categories.  I trust the summary I left here is adequate --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 22:56, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collegiality in the Catholic Church 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Collegiality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130802084853/http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19651028_christus-dominus_en.html to http://www.vatican.va/archive/hist_councils/ii_vatican_council/documents/vat-ii_decree_19651028_christus-dominus_en.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:25, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is no source given on the information in the section currently titled "In the Roman Republic", originally titled "Roman Collegiality" and added in this edit by Kuralyov and not significantly modified since.
The linked wiki articles more or less attest to the existence of the practice described; I am concerned with a source for this practice being called, in some way, "collegiality". 96.243.96.110 (talk) 20:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for "In the Roman Republic" section?