lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:ZIP (file format)

message: The text "For example, encryption is not supported in Windows 10 Home edition" references a article about NTFS' EFS (Encrypting File System) encryption, which has nothing to do with the encryption in zip files. This text should be changed to contain correct information. --Sonic The Hedgehog LNK1123 (talk) 03:57, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section "Implementation" contains incorrect information regarding the Windows zip feature 

message: When using zlib for deflate compression it looks like one needs to use "raw deflate" with no zlib header or trailer, by specifying -ve windowBits to deflateInit2(). Otherwise for example unzip fails, complaining about "invalid compressed data to inflate".
Also the 2-byte 'compression method' fields need to be 8, not 0x800.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.48.14 (talk) 23:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deflate details 

message: First of all it should be simplified so everyone can understand it rather than using words like appending files to the end of the zip.
The fast way of reading a zip is bottom up. Once the end of directory signature is found it tells you where to read the file to start reading the central directory. The central directory signatures is a listing of files paths in the zip followed by the location the file signature for the file can be found.
As a bit of a note each file signature contains the file path of the file as well. We can write a new file signature for this file at the location where the central directory starts. We then can write the central directory after this file signature and update the file signature location of just the one.
This also means you end up with two file signatures in the zip for the same file in which the one we added contains the changes. So the reality is we can add files at the start of the central directory and write it back out with the file we changed with the updated positions to the added file signature. This also means we end up with a file signature that is not referenced from the central directory. 24.150.140.42 (talk) 21:04, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How unreferenced files happen.
Talk:Cultur

message: This page is to help links for words like cultural that don't contain the entire word culture -- similar to other malformed links like categories.
: So why wouldn't someone link to "cultural"?  If someone knows enough about Wikipedia to know that you can do cultural, then why wouldn't they just do cultural?  (And categories is not a redirect to [[category; it's a link to a description of the board game.) -- Walt Pohl 20:50, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooh, thanks for the excellent example of why I like this sort of link! See, a lot of pages like Categories are indeed used to link to Category, because you can't do Categorys like for most words. Thus we get (potentially) redirects like Categories, Categorical, Categorified, and so on. So my idea is to just create a redirect from Categori -- the root that linguistically replaces Category -- then links the above as Categories, Categorical, Categorified, and so on. Thus, I create one redirect once, rather than having to create a whole bunch one at a time. (But of course, I have no objection whatsoever if somebody prefers to create a bunch of redirects instead!) With the example of Categories, we see yet another good result -- Categori can redirect to Category even if Categories is about something else. -- Toby Bartels 19:44, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:ModulE

message: This is a very old page from the CamelCase days that may have external links to it.
: Why would this be Camel Case instead of just a typo?  I'm not familiar with a mathematical concept, or any concept, called "Modul E". -- User:Waltpohl
:: You can tell by looking at the edit history of Module. It dates from before MediaWiki had free links, so it was impossible to create a page titled simply Module.
More to the point, as far as I'm concerned - are we really responsible for such external links (for all time)? Charles Matthews 21:39, 27 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, of course! They are harmless, and any possibility of an external link to an old title requires us to maintain that link. This is just good Internet practice. In this case, the chance of an external link is low -- but wasting our time deleting these things is terrible policy, a policy that Wikipedia has rejected since its founding. -- Toby Bartels 19:34, 4 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Cnidoscolus stimulosus

message: I understand why you think "sand hill," Obli, but in the Carolinas "sandhill" refers to a specific landform. So I will change it back.  Pollinator 19:59, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Pollinator 20:22, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2004

message: My thanks for this. I have long been wondering if the annoying green thing we have in the Deep South was a true nettle.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CF99:2080:79CA:B706:6F66:2A0B (talk) 16:16, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pithy
Talk:Avatar

message: It is a false interpretation. Vishnu is the constellation Orion (at least this is his cosmic form) which can be seen from his car with eight wheels (similar to Odin's eight footed horse Sleipnir) the constellation Lepus. The river "Ganges" emerging from the right foot of Vishnu is the constellation Eridanus. And the three steps of Vishnu though the universe are the movements up and down of the Orion in the course of precession. This movement begins in the great flood which according to Berossos took place about 33.500 BC (and is the reason why this event is calculated backwards to 36.000 BC). The first movement was upwards the second downwards ended 10.500 BC. The third step is just under way and therefore Originaly cannot be meant the third step. This is confirmed by the fact that Bali (or Mahabali) is the Indian name of Kronos who according to Herodot was overthrown about 17.500 BC, which means after the beginning of the third step and not after the end. Even more: according to the Rigveda and Mahabharata the Kaliyuga will end, when Vishnu finished this third step. 2003:F5:F746:F400:58FF:87C1:D9A3:FC2 (talk) 18:40, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vamana avatara not after third step of Vishnu 

message: Obviously the "license problem" is a bullshit-argument to add another Dashavatara-depiction, as the IP re-added the image themselves. Annoying behavior has also been shown by this IP at :Dashavatara. Given the twarted nature of their "argument," I'm not inclined to accept multiple images here. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 16:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "License problem" 

message: Add Vishnu / vaishnavism wikipedia thumbnail images to this article, and plz change image for vaishnavism . 
 Vinay viniyl (talk) 14:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Vishnu Vinay viniyl (talk) 14:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be more specific. Thanks, Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 15:48, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change picture.
Wikipedia talk:Style and How-to Directory

message: With the new community main page, I think 168's project is no longer needed. We should be able to get everything we need on the new community page, so I propose to redirect there. --Michael Snow 20:16, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirecting to community main page

message: I've decided to be bold and remove all the italicizing on this page, except the "(disputed)" labels. Makes for a much more readable page, I think. I also changed the top-level bullets to headings. Do we even need the topmost heading? I believe the page title says it all... - dcljr 23:47, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style change 

message: Cascading Style Sheets has the "float" attribute. This allows you to "float" a box to the left or right of the normal flow of the text. The text then wraps around the box. I am a Wikipedia newbie so I can't tell you how you would actually get this done.--James Bayley 18:26, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrapping text around contents box 

message: As part of the process of splitting the "style" and "how-to" categories (as approved here) I am going to split up this page.  Its contents will be converted into navigational templates, category listings, or both.  This will take a few days.  When this process is completed, you will be able to visit :Category:Wikipedia how-to and :Category:Wikipedia style guidelines for how-to and style information, respectively.  Feel free to drop a note on my user talk page if you have any concerns or suggestions.  Thanks, Beland 02:38, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Days, or...months.  The bursting process is complete, and I am now cleaning up inbound links. -- Beland 02:52, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Bursting this page

message: New chief minister
Pramod savant Ljparmar (talk) 16:27, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goa state
Talk:Hasan ibn Ali

message: Earlier in 2022, the article was heavily edited from the now-blocked IP address . Here is a sample where 
was changed to 
which omits the key part, i.e., the rebellion. There are numerous similar edits from this IP address to the article and I'm hoping to undo them in the next few weeks. It would not be feasible to log every such edit with this level of detail, so I'd use the edit summary "Undoing the edits from the blocked IP address 119.73.112.164" for the sake of convenience. Albertatiran (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restoring the content
Talk:Quraish

message: the difference between Shia and Sunni was simply over political beliefs A very dignified euphemism. Perhaps these rival political beliefs could be characterized for us. Wetman 20:39, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope some of the propblems are fixed now...--Striver 13:29, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The proper name for this article is Banu Quraish, per every other tribe name, see Arabian tribes that interacted with Muhammad.--Striver 19:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: "Isaac is the father of the Jews and Ishmael is the father of the Muslims".  What kind of a research is this?  Only 16-18% of the Muslims are Arabs.  Among the Arabs, only a portion is Arabized Arabs.  Ismaeel was father of a portion among the Arabized Arabs.  Majority of the Ismaeelites have moved out of Arabia and not Arab anymore.  Some settled in East in Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Burma, Indonesia, Malaysia, and even Philippines.  Some moved West and are settled all over Africa.  A big number of them are even settled in North America.  About 10% of the Arabs are Christians.  Before Israel, half of Palestine was Christian and Lebanon was a Christian country.
The same way majority of Jewish people have left Judaism and have become Christians (e.g. Pres Candidate John Kerry's grandfather), Muslims, Buddhist (e.g. Leonard Cohen), and Atheist/Agnostics.  On the other hand many gentiles have converted to Judaism (e.g. Bob Rae former Ontario Prime Minister).
Hassanfarooqi 17:45, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ismail father of Muslims? 

message: I think the Battle of Badr should be mentioned in this article.  Badagnani 22:51, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Battle of Badr]] 

message: I noticed that in the first page, of this article says that the Quraysh were Muhammad's chief "protagonist". Quite the opposite actually, I'm changing it to it's antonym. Hope that's alright, this'll be the first edit I'll have made aside from sandbox edits from my IP address. --KonigArtus 22:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protagonist
Talk:List of places in Saxony

message: silesia not in Saxony??
--Yak 20:44, Feb 26, 2004 (UTC)
:No, Silesia is not in Saxony, but a tiny part of Saxony is part of Silesia, see Niederschlesischer Oberlausitzkreis and Görlitz. Actually this list is quite useless, and I just pieced it hastily together in order to replace an even more useless list. A list like this does not provide the possibility to give explanations, so the users have to click on the links and see why a place is in this list. -- Baldhur 21:56, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spliceosome

message: Discussion pasted from vfd:
*Spliceome - a freshly invented term, as far a I can tell.  (44 google hits, of which most are misspellings of spliceosome or about a database named SpliceOme) Stewart Adcock 22:34, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article lacks everything included in the LSm article. Who dares the courageous merge? --Ayacop (talk) 18:43, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LSm 

message: I have removed the following:
In 2008 new evidence derived from the first crystal structure of a group II intron suggested that the spliceosome is actually a ribozyme, and that it uses a two–metal ion mechanism for catalysis.
* The intron in question is self-splicing, and may not comprise the spliceosome in its entirety. 
* Its not clear if the reverse transcriptase ORF is considered part of the ribozyme or not. (The ORF was replaced for the crystallisation, so is not discussed in the paper.)
* The importance of this paragraph is in the evolutionary development of the spliceosome, so should be part of a progression in that context.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 20:40, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Type II introns
Talk:Sex show

message: Discussion pasted from Wikipedia:Votes for deletion -- Graham  :) 21:14, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: "Sex shows are distinguished from striptease in that sex show performers engage in sexual activity rather than simply undressing and dancing nude." Notionally, maybe. As I understand it, there are UK "strip shows" were the female audience masturbate and fellate the performers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.46.255.43 (talk) 19:34, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delineation 
Talk:Antebellum

message: i question the neutrality of this article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.56.51.177 (talk) 08:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  neutral? 

message: The reference to "scorched earth" here has a link to the scorched earth article but appears to contradict it, since the article describes a scorched earth policy as destroying one's own resources, not destroying an enemy's resources. Ken Arromdee 20:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: Why does antebellum architecture redirect to this article? The architecture section is a joke, including such helpful information as "The Haunted Mansion at Disneyland - although it is not in the South (nor is it an actual house), it still is an example of antebellum architecture" and some links - it has no pictures, no description of architectural elements, nothing. --Alphanum3r1c 11:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architecture 

message: I dispute the following sentence:
While the South was largely ruined after the Civil War, this had as much or more to do with the failed domestic polices of the Confederacy, notably its impressment of food supplies and thousands of uprooted civilians, as it did with the scorched earth policy of Sherman. 
No source cited, blames atrocities committed by Northern leaders on "domestic policy."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.33.63.207 (talk) 15:38, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality / Unbased Claims 

message: The antebellum means befor the Civil war.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.249.7.33 (talk) 23:08, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antebellum days 

message: The Industrial is mythically substituted for by the widespread destruction of Sherman's March to the Sea  - that makes no sense.  Corvus cornixtalk 20:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What does this mean?

message: The date of the Kansas Nebraska Act should be 1854.
65.189.162.170 (talk) 01:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Kansas-Nebraska Act 

message: I'm not sure what the intent was with a split tag here and a merge tag on History of the United States (1849–1865), but since there was no discussion area, I removed them. Antebellum (not unlike Ancien Regime) covers specific ideas and concepts that I wouldn't be at all comfortable with merging into the primary "History of..." article. If someone wishes to discuss this topic, please feel free to do so. Recognizance (talk) 20:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge/split
Talk:LookSmart

message: Good idea removing all of that lawsuit detail, presumably true but of interest to the merest handful of readers. :robinp 21:32, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuit 

message: This is an interesting case of mismanagment by LookSmart:
Founders Start again after LookSmart's exit
Mathmo Talk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathmo (talk • contribs) 04:56, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  start.com.au 
Talk:Gray-bellied night monkey

message: The IUCN, seems to say the 4 subspecies are in 3 Central American countries and Colombia. Any verification? ...Mmcannis 17:08, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: MSW3 says this species is in Panama, Equador, and Colombia. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Taxonomy chapter of "New Perspectives in the Study of Mesoamerican Primates", of which Groves is a co-author, seems to back off from this.  Apparently a study by Defler in 2001 (which I believe is subsequent to MSW3; at least it appears to be from the way the chapter is written) concluded that A. zonalis is a separate species.  So, we may want to consider using the subsequent taxonomy on this, instead of following MSW3.  I started an article on A. l. zonalis presuming subspecies status (but noting the controversy), so the taxonomy in that article may also need to be reconsidered. Rlendog (talk) 03:47, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Msw3 was published in 2005, although mostly written in 2003, so the 2001 paper by Defler is older even than that. I'll ask Groves his thoughts on the genus. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:27, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah.... I'd already asked him about Aotus: "In as far as anything can be settled, yes.  In my book, hence in MSW 3 (which was delayed for two years between completion of the manuscript and publication), I think I was much too much of a lumper in Aotus. Defler, in his publications and discussions, has convinced me that it is all much more complicated in Colombia than I had thought.  And this is not the last word either (the question of the identity of the “real” lemurinus, for example, is still not settled, and it looks like there may be a new species to be described), but of course we have to report to the wide world from time to time, and somehow to make it clear that discoveries are still being made." So it looks like the best thing to do is to hold on until something new is published, but we can note that things are more complicated and that the taxonomy is fluid. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:32, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Range of species

message: Monke :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.232.188.74 (talk) 23:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monkey
Talk:Formidable-class battleship

message: Janes Fighting Ships 1919 lists 7 out of 8 of these ships as Formidable-class (exception is HMS Bulwark, unclassifised).  www.battleships-cruisers.co.uk says only Formidable, Implacable and Irresistible are Formidable-class, the rest are London-class.  Any idea which is right? Geoff 21:49, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: My Naval Annual 1913 doesn't have a lot to say, lists all eight together, with five including London getting a footnote noting a change in the bow armor. So I think the Londons could be considered a "subclass", which would explain the confusion. I would put them all in the Formidable class, add a redir, and use the article to explain the minor differences - when I get around to uploading the nice diagrams in my book, it will look kind of silly to clone the one diagram into two purportedly-different articles. Stan 22:11, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: Just a note in case anyone watches this article, but I'm planning on chopping it up in the next few days to bring it in line with how most historians treat the Formidable and London classes (see this discussion here). Gibbons seems to be the only historian who treats all 8 ships to be one class, so it hardly seems justifiable to give his opinion primacy of place. I'll wait a few days to see if there are any objections, but in the absence of any, I'll start hacking. Parsecboy (talk) 12:59, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Since it's been a week and there have been no objections, I'm going to start chopping away. Parsecboy (talk) 21:06, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heads up
Talk:Interpreter (communication)

message: Isnt this more of a dictionary entry really - unsuitable for wikipedia? Ludraman, 2220, 26/02/04
----
I suggest the article renamed to Interpreter (natural language) or Interpreter (human language), because there are interpreters for sign languages as well and I don't see a reason to write separate articles for them. Maybe (human language) is better, because interpreting could also be done between constructed languages. --Farside 11:52, 7 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, no objections for a month so now moved to Interpreter (communication) - it excludes computer languages but includes all languages and methods used for communication. --Farside 17:32, 8 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Folies Bergère

message: That paragraph needs work. Otherwise nice job!
Who else notable performed at the Folies Bergères? Did Edith Piaf?  Wondering, -- Infrogmation 22:20, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 'In 1936, Derval brought'

message: Does anyone know why "48°52′27″N, 2°20′42″E" is at the top of the page? --tess 19:06, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is the coordinates to Folies Bergère.  I've made it look more like coordinates I've seen on other pages. --tess 20:13, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Those GPS coordinates

message: The idea that folie is from the Latin word for leaf is a historical fantasy. The relevant French word in that case is feuille. Folie has an entirely different etymology. See here
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/feuille
here
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/folie
here  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.21.106.137 (talk) 11:38, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the name of "folies" 

message: Why are you showing the location on a map of France, instead of a map of Paris? Valetude (talk) 23:37, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: According to the On This Day for 1st May, the place actually opened on the 1st May, 1869.
Is it possibly for someone to double check this, and correct the relevant articles?
Thanks.
Cuddy2977 (talk) 16:47, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  On This Day
Talk:Post-Autistic Economics

message: This article is reproduced under the attached license (non-commercial, attribution).
:Um... what attached license? func(talk) 22:54, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is hopelessly POV and should clearly be merged with Post Autistic Economics.
Or is this even notable enough for inclusion in the first place? jni 10:59, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Present article appears to be result of merge and some NPOV cleanup. DCDuring 16:14, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge and NPOV