Talk:Margaret I of Denmark

message: Who on Earth is the "Benjamin Bach" mentioned in this article? And who is the Benjamin Bach mentioned in the ariticle about Queen Margrethe II of Denmark? This claim must be verified.
 
::It seems that mr Bach has been coming and going since the page was formed. Is it a persistent saboteur logging on from different computers or is it some sort of virus?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.164.41.45 (talk) 19:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A Joke?

message: I once saw that she was born in March 1353. Is that true? jeanne (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: The name of her mother was Helvig in Danish, Heilwig in German, Haelwig in English, not Hedwig/Hedvig - and has been given correctly in this article's text amd info box all along. I have put in a move request for her page today to try to correct the mess made there through an undiscussed move last fall.  SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:16, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of mother 

message: I tried to repair this in  the lede of the article:
*... Margrét Valdimarsdóttir),[A] (March 1353[1] ... 
but now it's already back. Are back-to-back parentheses OK now 
# in general?
# only in this particular article?
# because there is a comma in between?
# because there's a comma and a ref tag in between?
# when someone is too lazy to figure out another way of (re)writing stuff?
Please enlighten me! SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:17, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Back to backs OK now? 

message: There was never any Margaret II, so why is this at Margaret I? Tad Lincoln (talk) 02:00, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The current Queen Margrethe II of Denmark is Margaret II, only that her name is not angliced at Wikipedia the way Margaret I (Margrete I) is. With regards, Iselilja (talk) 02:13, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Margaret I? 

message: Mixed indicates that there are as many historians who have negative opinions on her abilities as those who are positive about her. However it's anything but mixed. Any major figure in history has critics. It's fair to show the opinions of the minority, but if a person being criticized by even a minority means it's "mixed", then any person's reputation can be described as mixed. Also Larsen just criticizes her vision regarding some matters. She still describes Margaret as a great leader. So "historians' opinion on Margaret are mixed" are totally unacceptable.
Deamonpen (talk) 08:50, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Mixed

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Margaret I of Denmark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141109161827/http://shmeerumschlungen.npage.de/ausfluege/ochseninseln.html to http://shmeerumschlungen.npage.de/ausfluege/ochseninseln.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:31, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Whatever the Pope called you was the title you had. Her contemporary Pope called her Queen of Denmark, Norway and Sweden. That settles that. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 17:52, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Pope decided this

message: The nickname "Queen breechless" - supposedly given by Albrecht of Mecklenburg, is widely regarded as a myth by modern historians (Such as Dick Harrison in his book on the Kalmar Union).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.162.82.134 (talk) 10:05, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: He allegedly called her "King Breechless" not Queen ... --SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:23, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen breechless 

message: I wrote to the user who did this and requested a source, rather than tagging the article. Having read everything there is about Margaret, I have never heard of that. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:42, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Queen of Denmark?

message: Hi, in the section Death, it says she set sail in her ship, Trinity, with ref given, AFAICS, Chisholm/Encyc. Brit 1911, p. 702. The EB mentions Trinity as day of a meeting, but not as the name of a ship. It would also be surprising if she were to have named a ship in English, and not in Danish ("Treenigheden") ... However, there may be other sources which I'm not aware of, and so I didn't edit the article today. The edit will be to simply strike the one word, Trinity, leaving all the rest as is. If no source is presented in a modicum of time, I'll do that. T 84.208.65.62 (talk) 19:25, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit: Link to EB p 702: https://archive.org/details/encyclopaediabri17chisrich/page/702/mode/2up T84.208.65.62 (talk) 19:26, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trinity 

message: I rolled back 3 edits by a user who wants us to use Olav (Norwegian) rather than Olaf (English). SergeWoodzing (talk) 19:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rollback today