lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Outer Continental Shelf

message: I have wikified some of the links on this fairly new page, and removed the 'deadend' tag.  However, I noticed just today that the information used by whomever initiated the page, and quoted extensively on the article page, is somewhat more narrow than just the United States OCS perspective, which is already fairly narrow in that it is does not yet offer a worldwide perspective.  The main text of the article appears to be quoted from a U.S. federal government page () that covers only the Gulf Of Mexico Region (GOMR), and thus does not even cover the other regions within the Minerals Management Service of the US Dept. of the Interior (Alaska, Atlantic coast, Pacific coast, etc.) N2e 16:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Article has been substantially cleaned up now, map added, etc.  Still could use more work; but it is no longer a new stub class. N2e 22:44, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs more work 

message: This article REALLY needs a map.  
Voila; I just found one.
There is a great, almost-ready-to-use-in-WP map of the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf lands at http://ocsenergy.anl.gov/guide/ocs/index.cfm
It needs a little editing work to take some specific text off of the top of the map, but that text is over Canadian lands so it should be easy to simply cut it off for someone who is familiar with Wikipedia graphic insertion and GIF file editing. There is a larger-size version available by clicking the graphic on the main page. N2e 22:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Image:Outer Continental Shelf map.png Jackaranga 05:42, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Map has been added to article.  Thanks to Jackaranga for building the map and putting it into the Wikipedia commons! N2e 22:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: US Gvmt Map of OCS is available

message: This article must remain as US-specific. `'Míkka 02:46, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article scope

message: User:lightmouse erased the salient point that the Louisiana miles were different, and also didn't provide near enough precision.  These are not measured quantities; they are defined quantities.  Gene Nygaard 00:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The lightmouse edit

message: The 3 References to MMS are now broken links since the establishment of BOEMRE, which replaced MMS.  I made the correction of adding BOEMRE's info and link but now I believe their authority is broader than the Article indicates. Rengewwj (talk) 16:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BOEMRE
Talk:SM U-14 (Austria-Hungary)

message: Since this article seems to have more information about the submarine's service in the Austro-Hungarian Navy (and further information about its service for A-H is available than for French service), I think it would be better at  (currently a redirect). If there are not any objections, I will move this soon. — Bellhalla (talk) 15:57, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article move 

message: In October 1917, the U-14 sank the Italian steamer Capo di Monte. Is this ship the Capodimonte in any way related to this vessel? 
*
Broichmore (talk) 17:24, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Puzzle
Talk:Poznań Stadium

message: The name of the stadium should be changed in Poznań City Stadium, like it is in Kielce City Stadium or Białystok City Stadium. Isn´t that right? --Berlinschneid (talk) 13:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: This stadium is not UEFA five star stadium as it is shown in the article. Due to its capacity four stars are max. for this stadium (if all the other criteria are in order).Ratipok (talk) 02:50, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  UEFA Stadia criteria 
Talk:QLTM

message: I do not believe that this article should be deleted based on the criteria of notability.  Although not widely used, and therefore not "noteable" by the bot that put this article up for deletion, it is important for Wikipedia to contain information such as this to be more accurate, noteworthy, and complete.  As with other non-electronic encyclopedias such as The Encyclopedia Britannica, not all information contained may be noteable to all people, but may be of interest so some users.  This only enhances the usefulness of Wikipedia.  If QLTM is not noteworthy, then other forms of internet slang that are already part Wikipedia such as "LOL", "OMG" would also not meet the criteria.
TETFSU 16:06, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not a bot.  I'm a person.  It might help you to read the notability criteria, so you can offer the reliable sources that would be needed to prevent deletion.  There are plenty of reliable sources cited on the LOL article. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Deletion
Talk:Waterless car wash

message: There were three articles, two of which with almost identical content, and all three read like a promotion. I am using this article as the merge target since Waterless Car Wash has the wrong capitalization and Dry wash seems to be derived from a brand name. I will use the text from Dry wash, since it has some links, although I will add  and may reduce it to the first few sentences if the article isn't improved and sourced. — Sebastian 08:48, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: I propose merging this article as a new section in the Car wash article. Although it seems the target article currnetly deals exclusively with automated car washes, it could be expanded, and IMO there isn't enough info here to warrant a separate article.  Ivanvector (talk) 17:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I suggest merging into Auto detailing instead. Car wash deals with a type of business, and Waterless car wash is clearly about a type of detailing product.  Ivanvector (talk) 17:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger (Nov 2009)
Talk:IQinVision

message: I am attempting to provide an article that gives an accurate and neutral history of the company IQinVision. I will eventually add to this article with references to Megapixel sensor technology, resolution references as it relates to DOD and DOJ findings for pixels per foot for forensic analysis, market indices, etc.
My first cut and paste was straight off the company website and that was probably not wise but I have since cleaned it up to make it more neutral. While we obviously hope that a Wikipedia article favors our business, the point of this article in my mind is the education of the World as to high-resolution surveillance in the physical security space. I welcome commentary and advice as to how to keep this article neutral.
I have compared it to articles about companies such as Coca Cola and McDonalds and find nothing in the current copy on the IQinVision article to be any more or less promotional than those two accepted articles.
I request that the request for speedy deletion of the IQinVision page be lifted.
Iqeye 16:11, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Single (football)

message: "since the 1970's its been consited a dead ball, but before then it was a live ball.
Some want the single to inculde the goal posts as well, with the receiving team getting the ball placed on the 45 yard line, not the 35 yard line as in a unsaral single, and therefore be link the behind in Australia Football as that is also the case."
IDK why someone deleted this, I know all that's true, as Kanga-Kucha (and his various names) posted the later on the cfl.ca and 13thman.com forums, as well as got many fans to submit that rule, along with others, into the fan vote last year as well as this year. I hope someone will, and it stays, but if not, at least I can say it here for KK's sake.--69.180.37.180 (talk) 02:38, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ball hitting the uprights 

message: *The article doesn't seem to make clear which team receives the point off of a single. Is it the team that kicked it, or the team receiving it that gets a point? Jedibob5 (talk) 07:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which team receives the point? 
Talk:Pagani, Campania

message: Plinio (Caii Plinii Secundi, Historiæ naturalis, libri XXXVII, IV, 5 ) says that Taurania was In Campano agro Stabia oppidum fuere so close to Stabia, not close to Nuceria Alfaterna (Pagani is bordered by Nocera). Moreover was Nuceria the chief town in the valley of the Sarnus, as evidenced by the ancient coins. 
Barbatianus is medieval place, no evidences the are about a romanian foundation.
The city was founded in the fifteenth century, after the Pagano's family moved to Corte in Piano.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.77.196.63 (talk) 17:16, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:British H-class submarine

message: The lead section says Despite their cramped size and lack of a deck gun..., but the picture captioned "H4 at Brindisi, August 1916" clearly shows a gun mounted on the deck, and the infobox has 1 × QF 6 pounder gun (H1–H4 only). Verbcatcher (talk) 01:26, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deck gun
Talk:Stig Sæterbakken

message: Is the current source on Sæterbakken's death reliable enough to be used here? I do not wish to delete it myself but having read about use of sources I fell the need to ask the question. This webcite has a very shor news section about the death of the author but the page may be soon deleted or made invisible. So the reliabilit may soon be difficult to check. --Teodor 10:24, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We could make sure it is preserved by using WebCite. __meco (talk) 11:00, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: God idea but is the source itself reliable enough to be used? As you know, the Norwegian W has recently had a category delete discussion concerning this cause of death. I myself favour categorising. However there are no sources on his death cause locally as the Noregian press usually abstains from mentioning it. If it is considered good enough I would like to use it at no:W as well. See no reason to be more cautious there than here. --Teodor 11:10, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say that's an acceptable source for this information. As for what the Norwegian Bokmål Wikipedia does and doesn't do, that really doesn't matter outside its kindergarten enclosure as that project regularly purges itself of its most earnest and adept contributors and therefore is finding itself trapped in solipsism. __meco (talk) 12:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a very odd remark to make here on this talk page. Curious as I was I had to see what you have posted there and I find to my surprise that you have been banned indefinetely. I was just asking if the source was reliable. Now I wonder if you are reliable. Teodor  —Preceding undated comment added 13:46, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

text: I have removed the statement, as one of the two links in the reference was dead, and the other one didn't mention Sæterbakken at all. - Soulkeeper (talk) 15:20, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source on death
Talk:TekBots

message: I think the article needs additional independent sources to meet WP:N.  The Gazette-Times.com article is one such source.   --Ronz 16:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?

message: I don't have a source for this outside of personal experience, but Oregon State University is phasing out the TekBots program. They still use the same controller board, but students don't put it on a robot chassis and progressively add features in each TekBots class. 2604:2800:FFF9:955:8638:3B9A:EC5E:7430 (talk) 17:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  OSU phasing out TekBots
Talk:Julie London (album)

message: If, as has been suggested by User:122.2.99.29, Julie London is the actual title of the album, then You Don't Have to Be a Baby to Cry should be merged into this article. I would like to see some evidence to support the claim though. Paul20070 16:33, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moving the article to Julie London (album) would probably also be a good idea. This title is confusing. Paul20070 16:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, ignore that last bit. Julie London (Julie London album) would be right. Paul20070 21:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Have merged You Don't Have to Be a Baby to Cry with this article since both appear to contain the same information, but feel free to undo this if you disagree. Thanks TheRetroGuy (talk) 16:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Grand Island Senior High School (New York)

message: Certain users have made the argument that this page's poltical oppression tab is too lengthy, that is cause to streamline it, not entirely delete it. I believe what is actually happening is the intention vandalism of the page, as certain IP addresses attributed with these deletions can be traced back to the very school district in question. In addition, specific users have blanket erased the section based on it's length. Once again, I would highly encourage those people to edit or streamline the section, but not erase it.
Burntham113 (talk) 03:45, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Political Oppression Stub

message: The disputed section that has been warred over is a violation of WP:BLP. It contains names of people and no sources. I have no idea if it is notable enough to be included but it sure can't be without sources. CBWeather, Talk, Seal meat for supper? 07:49, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full protection 

message: This article does not contain nearly as much information about the school as the article for the school distract as a whole, Grand Island Central School District. It should either be updated with the same information, or deleted and redirected to Grand Island Central School District. Abobeck11 (talk) 19:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Article should either be expanded upon or deleted
Talk:Polla, Italy

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: moved (page mover nac)  Flooded with them hundreds 07:59, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
----
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edoardo_Monteforte Wikiproject Orphanage: You can help! Brunetti22 (talk) 00:38, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 October 2018
Talk:Ponte, Campania

message: The Italian article on this has a wealth of information.  I do not know Italian, but a member that does could increase the amount of content on this article. S♦s♦e♦b♦a♦l♦l♦o♦s (Talk to Me) 20:16, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It also needs an infobox. - Animagentile (talk) 05:14, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Hi, I've translated the italian Wikipedia page and the history page from the official Ponte website, and mashed them together...
Ponte has its origins in an ancient Roman stone bridge which was the passage of the Via Latina over the Alento river.
The first settlements can be traced back to Roman times, in fact it was here that the roadway Via Latina, connecting Benevento with Rome through the Valley Telesina, passed. The bridge that the passed over the Alento river is today known as the St. Anastasia Bridge. The town was very important even during the Lombard domination. The old town is of medieval origin, although little is left of the castle of Norman origin built in the eleventh century CE. There was also a large Benedictine abbey built in the eighth century AD. The territory was ruled by the Count Ranulf Baldwin Norman, who took care of the development, renewing and expanding the ancient church of Saint-Denis which he dedicated to St. Benedict. 
In later times, Ponte belonged to the major families of the Kingdom, such as the Sanframondos, the Carafas, and the Caracciolos, for example. 
Ponte was a stronghold of the House of Sanframondo, but during this period, due to a plague and a violent earthquake, which devastated a good part of the area, Ponte became uninhabited. 
In 1585 it was bought by Domenico Sarria, who retained the title of Duke of Ponte until the abolition of the feudal regime.
On June 18, 1913, the city was grant autonomy from the frazione of Casalduni.
It does have some grammatical issues, so, if someone wants to tackle it and make it flow a bit better, feel free to.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.129.149.202 (talk) 17:02, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Visvesvaraya Iron and Steel Plant

message: Article currently reads in part It was started as the Mysore Iron Works on 18 January 1923 by Nalvadi Krishnaraja Wodeyar and his Diwan Sir M Visvesvaraya (my emphasis).
I think Diwan isn't really English. Perhaps we should say engineer or advisor? Andrewa (talk) 07:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diwan
Talk:List of Primeval characters

message: Why aren't the characters from Primeval: New World listed here? --LegerPrime (talk) 00:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primeval: New World 
Talk:Robert Blake (folk singer)

message: ° I'll try to find sources - Robert Blake is an important folk singer-songwriter! trnsz (talk) 14:45, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, .  Blake may be important to his fans and his following, but if the article does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines, it needs to be deleted.  A fan base does not necessarily make for what's required in the way of an encyclopedic article.  -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 00:51, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD
Talk:Anthology (The Supremes album)

message: Whose idea was it to make a list of added or removed tracks? I'm a huge fan and can't make sense of it, imagine others! Why don't you just make a complete tracklisting of every edition and in case if you must, add notes regarding the removal or addition of tracks? Also many know every edition carried different versions of the songs and remasters that dramatically change the song, so a simple list like the one of the page is even less relevant. Also I disagree on the inclusion of the 1995 edition as that is called "Best Of, Anthology Series", making its inclusion and the layout of this article all the more incorrect.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.0.76.150 (talk) 14:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page subdivision for editions of albums 

message: I feel that this article would be better improved if it was re-formatted, ala Anthology (The Jackson 5 album). Anyone want to volunteer? MaJic (comments go here) 21:26, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's a good idea MaJic, and seeing how well you worked on J5's Anthology album article, feel free to put your skills to good use on this article, too! Best, --Discographer (talk) 08:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting of article
Talk:Richter LLP

message: Good morning, 
We are currently up-dating the Richter page as the original creator of the page is no longer with the company. We need to change the name of the page from RSM Richter Chamberland to Richter LLP; the company went through a rebrand a few years ago and Richter LLP is now the current name (as indicated on www.richter.ca). 
Could this please be changed for us? 
Thank you
:Hmm. Well, it looks like you did it yourself. Altamel (talk) 03:11, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing company name
Talk:A. & J. Inglis

message: Is the following statement correct: "A & J Inglis of Glasgow, was formed in 1848 as an engineering works and in 1863 turned to shipbuilding." --NearEMPTiness (talk) 05:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier History 
Talk:Borough (Pennsylvania)

message: What are the requirements to become a Borough?  It seems that most of them are small(in land area) and densely populated.  Are there any boroughs that are actually large in terms of land area? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamanadam (talk • contribs) 16:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, administratively, what makes a borough a borought instead of, say, a township?  The article doesn't mention anything about how this form of government differs.  If it only differs, nominally, from a township, then that needs to be made note of. --Criticalthinker (talk) 05:39, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is exactly what I was just asking myself. I lived in Pennsylvania from 2000-2009, then moving to my native California. From what little I could tell, Townships divided themselves into postal "towns" that somewhat mimic unincorporated areas in California. And Boroughs did not. I'd be very curious to know the real distinction. YellowAries2010 (talk) 19:12, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm given to understand that townships are the oldest model, dating back to Penn, which most townships having converted to either boroughs or third-class cities. More information available in the Pennsylvania Manual on pages 6-5 and 6-6. -Fuzzy (talk) 18:25, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: What are the main job opportunities and income? Imursunshine22 (talk) 00:43, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jobs 

message: The second sentence begins with "Both", but the preceding sentence has only one subject - "Boros". I'm wondering if this was intended to be "Boros AND TOWNS" or "...AND TOWNSHIPS" PurpleChez (talk) 19:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description
Portal talk:Current events/Latin America

message: Can somebody please tell me how many people in the World visit this Portal, just to see if contribs here deserve a real purpose.--Andersmusician VOTE 16:57, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: visitors

message: A discussion about most of the Current events subportals has been opened at Miscellany for deletion. You are invited to participate in discussing the fate of these subportals. --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 14:29, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current events subportals MfD 

message: just now when I called this up it defaulted to Oct 2007 instead of May 2008 ....--Billymac00 (talk) 00:20, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Default date
Talk:John Teerlinck

message: : This was added in 2014. However, in the Colts 2011 media guide (p. 24), it says  2011 was his last season, and it looks like Freeneyand Mathis were Pro Bowlers that year. So that would be 25.  Unless the 31 counts a player multiple times, and 23 was unique players?  The obituary you cited for the 31 players seems like a WP:CIRCULAR reference, a classic case of the press using Wikipedia, even when it's not verifiable.—Bagumba (talk) 14:55, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The Colts themselves (well, their web writer) state that it was 31. —Bloom6132 (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Without a plausible explanation of discrepancy of the 23 in their 2011 media guide, there's no guarantee that the web writer also didn't just pull it from Wikipedia.  The best bet would be to find a source for 31 before it was added to Wikipedia in 2014.—Bagumba (talk) 15:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

text: FWIW, Colts.com also said he coached the 2012 season, which is what Wikipedia also incorrectly said until I just fixed it.—Bagumba (talk) 15:11, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the number to 23, since I cannot find any pre-2014 source that says 31. —Bloom6132 (talk) 15:15, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pro Bowl players 

message: : This was added in 2014 (like at #Pro Bowl players above). Looks like another problem with WP:CIRCULAR. The Colts' media guide says: . I did find one for Freeney, but it was the obscure Kansas City Committee of 101 award. Seems like WP:OR at best.—Bagumba (talk) 03:55, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Defensive MVPs