lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CCCP (disambiguation)

message: Is it actually a thing? I have no clue. Cocohead781 (talk) 17:05, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: A simple web search would suggest that this is not made up (random example), but as it stands it has no standalone article of itself, and you will also notice that "CCCP" does not stand for "Cut Cut Cut Act". Furthermore, a description such as , is opinionated and should not stand here. I have removed the entry. –72 (talk) 19:15, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

text: In fact, to explain further, since I noticed this, the addition "" is a serious breach of Wikipedia policy: reliable sourcing, original research, neutral point of view, take your pick. I think it would be very difficult to find a reliable source stating that a country that no longer exists (as of 26 years ago) has an influence over the USA. A disputed tag is not necessary if it goes against the core policies of this website. Please take the time fully read an edit when recent changes patrolling and if you can, do some research before you take action. –72 (talk) 19:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cut Cut Cut Act
Talk:Marty Ingels

message: The article says he sued Jones for divorce in 2002.  What became of that?!  66.105.218.20 (talk) 07:43, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Shirley Jones article states that she filed and withdrew a divorce petition in 2002. There's no further mention of a divorce or separation. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 02:00, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Divorce?

message: I removed text from this section that wasn't supported by reliable sources. Remember that reliable sources are required to include contentious information in a biography of a living person. Robofish (talk) 23:05, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Expand the rest of the article. BMK (talk) 19:20, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you've got it backwards. This is about a living person. We don't let BLP horrors fester while we wait around for someone to add stuff on this minor performer to make it less of a horror. See the "balance" section in WP:BLP: "The idea expressed in WP:Eventualism – that every Wikipedia article is a work in progress, and that it is therefore okay for an article to be temporarily unbalanced because it will eventually be brought into shape – does not apply to biographies." Given their potential impact on biography subjects' lives, biographies must be fair to their subjects at all times. This article would have to be about five times as long to justify all this stuff about his arrest. Sure, it can and should be mentioned, but not at such extravagant length. Coretheapple (talk) 13:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal troubles section 

message: *This article has been classified as a start. Capitalistroadster (talk) 04:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Where the Hell is Matt?

message: I'm going to redirect this to the longer article on Matt Harding, as it seems silly to have two articles on such a topic. ONUnicorn 15:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

message: The 2016 Video. Also, there's no mention of when he switched the website to WheretheheckisMatt.com. Aristophanes68 (talk) 18:28, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2016 video is up but not mentioned here
Talk:Bowery station

message: As now written, the infobox says that Essex Street is the next station north, and Canal Street the next station south.
Unfortunately, the Essex Street infobox says that Bowery is the next station north. This leads to the paradox that Bowery is north of Essex Street, yet Essex Stret is north of Bowery.
The root of the problem is that, on the original BMT, all lines had the Manhattan terminal as "railroad north," and Chambers Street was the terminal. Therefore, Chambers Street was "north" of both Canal Street and Fulton Street.
I think the correct solution is to use the infobox to portray "route north" and "route south" (as the passenger would see it), not "chaining north" and "chaining south." As far as I can tell, the only station infobox that needs to change is Essex Street. Marc Shepherd 15:59, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Direction problem
Talk:Essex Street (BMT Nassau Street Line)

message: As now written, this infobox has Marcy Avenue as the next station south, and Bowery as the next station north.
Unfortunately, the Marcy Avenue infobox has Essex Street as its next station south, and the Bowery infobox has Essex Street as its next station north. So, it appears that Bowery and Marcy Avenue should be "swapped" on this station's infobox.
The problem arises, I believe, because the original BMT configuration had Chambers Street as "north" for any train that passed through there, from either direction. But currently, I believe all of the infoboxes have Manhattan-bound trains on the BMT Jamaica Line as headed "south," leaving this page as the only anomaly. Marc Shepherd 16:06, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Direction problem
Talk:Columbanus

message: "In recent years, however, as Columbanus's deeds and legacy have come to be re-examined by historians, the traditional narrative of his career has been challenged and doubts have been raised regarding his actual involvement in missionary work and the extent to which he was driven by purely religious motives or also by a concern for playing an active part in politics and church politics in Francia." -Where is any of this discussed in the text? Just asking... Mannanan51 (talk) 20:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it as pointless in a lead that doesn't tell us anything specific about his missionary deeds anyways. Srnec (talk) 05:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede
Talk:DOT pictograms

message: The symbol called 'nursery' on this page is actually used for 'Baby Change' (as opposed to other toilet facility) everywhere I have seen it. raining girl (talk) 10:01, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nursery?? 

message: Might as well incorporate the complete set, for the permanent record, since these aren't part of Unicode or anything. The set at  seems to have an appropriate license. -- Beland (talk) 03:41, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We already link to the set at c: and this isn't a gallery. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:44, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete set
Talk:Opera a la Carte

message: If Opera a la Carte is two separate opera companies — separate places, separate people, different objectives — then each should be in its own article.
:If you click on "disambiguation" in the infobox, you get to a page that explains (in nauseating detail) how to do it. However, at this point it is not clear whether we will ever have the material for articles on both of these companies. I would cross that bridge when we get to it. Marc Shepherd 19:59, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Split per nom.  Either split the article in two or find a different home for the information, eg. something like articles on opera in the UK and opera in California.  The association by name is co-incidental and as it stands it is still stubby.  The simple thing is to split into two stubs with a dab page. Greenshed 02:58, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:2nd Foreign Parachute Regiment

message: The entire article, but specifically the Selection section, reads as if it was written by a 2REP fan boy and does not seem fitting for an encyclopedia.  I'll attempt to revise as much as possible in the coming months.ForwardObserver85 (talk) 06:23, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs extreme revision 

message: — Assignment last updated by HelloWorld9272 (talk) 21:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 202 - Thu
Talk:Steve Symms

message: Rewrote this:
:In the 1988 presidential election, at the behest of Lee Atwater, Symms floated a false rumor that Kitty Dukakis, the wife of Democratic presidential candidate Michael Dukakis, had burned an American flag to protest the Vietnam War, as well as a claim that Dukakis himself had been treated for a mental illness.
No one has seriously suggested that Atwater was responsible for Symms's statement about Mrs. Dukakis. The rumor about Dukakis being treated by a psychiatrist(sp?) came from the LaRouche organization and got significant media attention when Reagan made the "I'm not going to pick on an invalid" joke. Ellsworth 14:30, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1988 campaign

message: Srich (I'm pinging you as I don't know whether this is on your watchlist on not), original research is material for which no reliable, published sources exist – are you suggesting that the New York Times is not a reliable source? It's the paper of record, man. How is that not reliable. The Associated Press is a reliable source as well. Also, it isn't our opinion, it's the opinion of "liberal opponents" as I noted in my edit. I'll remove the "terrible" part and just put "criticized by liberal opponents for his civil rights record", if you believe that will make it NPOV. Also, it isn't synthesis if I'm stating material not published by one of the sources. Symms himself even gave a reason for voting against a civil rights bill because, in his words, "It's just another layer of the federal government that we don't need" and that free market should determine how many housing units there are for disabled. I didn't state anything not explicitly stated by the source. I stated "criticized by liberal opponents". Indeed, in one of his liberal opponents, Marilyn Shuler of the Idaho Human Rights Commission, stated that "I'm saddened that, once again, Sen. Symms has chosen not to support civil rights legislation." I believe my edits were entirely sound. I'd like to hear an argument for why they weren't, but I'd need to hear it quickly. Scaravich105nj (talk) 01:17, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay. Let's look at the NYT story on the Civil Rights bill. Symms is mentioned as voting against it. But was there any criticism of him from any groups for having done so?  None that I see in my quick scan of the article. So there is SYN gong on when the WP paragraph starts with the description of his "dismal/terrible" civil rights record (for which he has been criticized). But since the NYT article does not mention criticism, it is improper to add it to the paragraph. Moreover, saying "one of only five to vote against" is adding an editorial description.  – S. Rich (talk) 01:25, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: What about the Associated Press one? (The one with shuler). What's wrong with that? Scaravich105nj (talk) 01:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he was one of three. But now we're getting into the area of WP:UNDUE when we have one person (not a group) saying she was "saddened" by the vote.  Also, the particular vote comes under WP:NOTNEWS.  – S. Rich (talk) 01:35, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  symms civil rights
Talk:Interactive C

message: There's an unsigned comment: "This code is currently being developed. If you aren't a developer, leave it alone until April 8, 2006." I suppose I should just ignore this because it is obviously after April 8, 2006. I don't understand why it's there, though. I suppose I will delete the message if I don't see any discussion of the topic here after a while. I see that the page is a stub and I have experience with IC 3.2 at The Ohio State University. I'll be adding info, but let me know if anyone has different ideas. ~Kruck 16:29, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I definately think that this article should not be deleted. I will soon update the article in reference to the Newton Labs version of Interactive C which is familiar to me, but I will have to research what the Botball IC language is and how it is used.
It is understandable that this language is not known to users of the C programming language because Interactive C is is a "compilation environment" for robots and embedded systems which is meant to be a stripped-down version of C simply to make it easy to use.
~Kruck 21:47, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Deletion
Talk:International Children's Games

message: I'm really confused and puzzled, that both games were held by Taiwan just under their ROC national flag instead of , do we have evidences for this panorama? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:42, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Chinese Taipei is only used as team name. Location-wise and 'Hosts' is always Taiwan under sports articles. Chinese Taipei is a team name and cannot represent a location. For example, the correct usage in a sentence: "The Chinese Taipei national baseball team was awarded 3rd place in the 2022 WBSC U-12 Baseball World Cup, held in Tainan, Taiwan". Hope this clears things up. If you want, I'm fine with you adding a tag at the bottom saying ROC is commonly known as Taiwan, and uses Chinese Taipei to participate in international sports events. Kazuha1029 (talk) 03:28, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag for 2022 and 2016 games
Talk:.net (disambiguation)

message: What do you think about merging this page with NET to make more clear at the first sight? 16@r 18:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Dot NET should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 24#Dot NET until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.  1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:10, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dot NET" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:List of minor characters in The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy

message: The main character page was huge, so I split it. Look at the main article talk page. -- Henk65 16:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Actually, 2 dogs fused were male. Pay attention!Moojgoo 13:37, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiggy Jiggy  

message: HOW IN THE WORLD DO YOU KNOW WHEN THE BARON VON GHOULISH WAS BORN? I've never seen anything or anywhere where it states what year the show takes  place. One should not suppose that it takes place at the same time it was aired.Moojgoo 13:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baron 

message: "Don't let the name fool you.  He's not really a captain." as said by Pud'n Captain vsk 22:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captain Deadwood the Heartless 

message: This article is to be merged with and redirected to List of characters in The Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash - tk 23:32, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:DEC Multia

message: According to EK-MULTS-IN. C01, the VX42 had a 233 MHz 21068-AA chip. I don't think this existed - 21068 ran at 66 MHz and 21068A at 100 MHz according to other references. Therefore, I'll assume the 233 MHz part was a 21066A. Letdorf 16:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  21066A vs. 21068? 

message: If these things, designed to be consumer desktop PCs, only were as fast as Pentium 60, what was the point in buying or using them? - MSTCrow 21:54, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equiv. to Pentium 60? 
Talk:Five-pointed star

message: Can someone explain what the Shield of Solomon section is all about? I can't make any sense of it. For a start, the term "Shield of Solomon" is fairly uncommon, and like the Shield of David and the Seal of Solomon, of which it seems to be a conflation, it is more commonly shown as a hexagram, less commonly as a pentagram or a "five-pointed star". Furthermore, how is the five-pointed star a key to magic squares? I'm highly suspicious. Fuzzypeg☻ 23:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shield of Solomon

message: "If the collinear edges are joined together a pentagram is produced."
Those aren't edges; they're vertices.  Calling them collinear isn't useful unless you can say what line they're collinear with. --Rich (talk) 15:08, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pentagram
Talk:Vertical blanking interval

message: I have looked for facts regarding how VBI is related to DVI as stated in this article. I haven't found anything on the net and suspect that VBI is superseeded by the DVI and HDMI digital standards through HDCP. Anyone that know this for fact or can refer to a source please correct the article to either point to a source that DVI has VBI or remove the reference to it, it confuses things. --Starbar 12:38, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes the blanking interval is still there. As stated in the article, it allows programmers and hardware designers to do offline processing during that time. It's a ton easier to ping-pong different buffers than to try to handle "true" streaming data. HDCP has nothing to do with it - some of the article states what can happen in the VBLANK time. Page 32 of the TMDS data sheet, which is the protocol for a DVI connection, shows the timing of active video vs blanking. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 14:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes yes you are correct and I understand that there is a VBI intervall, I was looking for VBI data such as Closed Caption (CC), Wide Screen Signaling (WSS) and CGMS-A copy protection as well as the European Teletext data transmition over VBI. But you are right of course there is a VBI well defined even for DVI/HDMI but still, is it used to transfer these data packets on the hidden video lines? I guess not, and maybe that would be worth mentioning from a technical standpoint. The enduser never see the difference sinse it is burnt in by the receiver STB.  --Starbar 14:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good point. I added a brief comment to this article stating that DVI and HDMI have a vertical blanking interval, but cannot carry closed caption (CC) text, with a link to another article that goes into more detail. --DavidCary (talk) 05:36, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  VBI really available for DVI?! 

message: Surely the first paragraph should read "the time difference between the end of the first line of one frame or field of a raster display, and the beginning of the next" - "beginning" and "end" appear to be swapped round.
Colindente 17:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording of first paragraph is confusing
Talk:Moses Montefiore

message: I agree with the above comment. Someone needs to systematically update the entry based on Samet's 1989 book in Hebrew, or at the least based on Abigail Green 2010 book.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Domberlic (talk • contribs) 22:10, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a hagiography, not a biography 

message: What does this phrase mean?? Too Old (talk) 06:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "givedrs to turner "? 

message: Montefiore, of course, means Blumberg, but I don't see anywhere in Wikipedia where it says that. Varlaam (talk) 05:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literal meaning 
Talk:Office of the Chief Actuary

message: I am starting a page on the Office of Chief Actuary.  the information i am using comes from their website and related sources and is in the public domain.  i also have their permission to write the article and use their material, and am working with their PR person.  I want to describe the role of the actuary and actuarial estimates in our social welfare system.  Since social security is a partisan political issue, i will endeavor to make the article apolitical.  the article will apply to Canada and perhaps other nations.  joe 16:59, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds great, Joe. I have my hands full with other articles and RL, but I'll try to help out where I can. -- Avi 17:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: notes on article

message: How can this article have so many references when it is so short? There appear to be more references than text. How can there be so many references with so few footnotes? The references listed seem pretty dubious as article references. The "references" section looks more like it should be an external links section. Even then, many of the articles linked to seem inappropriate for an external links section. --JHP (talk) 04:49, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the history, it looks like this article rarely gets edited. It's had few real changes since being created three years ago. Therefore, rather than leaving the references section for someone else to sort out, I'm just going to delete the whole section. If someone thinks some of the references are actually appropriate and useful, they can resurrect them from the history. --JHP (talk) 04:58, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious references 

message: Just a note, it appears that in the United States there is an Office of the Chief Actuary, which is part of the Social Security Administration, and there is also an Office of the Actuary, which is part of the Department of Health and Human Services. Hopefully an editor with more knowledge than me will make a distinction between the two in the article. I actually came here while trying to look up the Office of the Actuary. --JHP (talk) 05:07, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Office of the Actuary
Talk:New Zealand White rabbit

message: Seeing that there are parenthetical references that have no bibliography and actual tab characters in the text, this was cut and pasted from a word processor; however, I cannot find this article anywhere on the net. Could this possibly violate WP:NOR? There is a better chance that it may violate WP:COPY. אמר Steve Caruso (desk/poll) 17:34, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Rubins reference is probably one of the existing external links, which I've reformatted. From a quick search, I imagine Verhallen might refer to "The Complete Encyclopedia Of Rabbits & Rodents" by Esther Verhoef-Verhallen, published by Book Sales, 2004 () and Bare might mean "Rabbits and Hares", by Colleen Stanley Bare, published by Putnam, 1983 (). So the article probably isn't original research. -- Avenue 02:18, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikification

message: http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/enwiki/1171036
This is a site where the text is verbatim what is in the Wiki article on the New Zealand White Rabbit.  Copyright violation?
Khkrause (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the link to Wikipedia on the page you cited, and the fact that the references at the bottom include Wikipedia-specific markup, it seems obvious that the Russian site is the one copying the Wikipedia article and not the other way around. 70.236.6.50 (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request

message: I think this should merged with other information about New Zealand rabbits to become a single article called "New Zealand Rabbit". Why have a separate one for White New Zealands? It doesn't make sense.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cityscape4 (talk • contribs) 01:32, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Merge/creation request