lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Interstate 81 in Virginia

message: This page needs the appropriate templates added.  I'll do that later.  First, I have to address something on the exit list.  On other Interstates such as Interstate 74 in North Carolina and Interstate 40 in North Carolina, I put a banner denoting multiplexes only when the exit numbers changed for the road for which the exit list existed (follow the Interstate 40 one to Greensboro, it has three different exit number schemes over a 20-mile length).  Otherwise, routes joining were just mentioned in the Notes column to the right.  I don't really have a problem with it as it is.  I just think it could look a little better.  Thoughts?  --MPD T / C 21:35, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My comments above are over a year and a half old.  This exit list needs to be cleaned up a little anyway.  I think you mean "overuse of colspans"? --MPD T / C 22:59, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The SVG map in the info box currently shows I-81 ending at northern I-64... it needs to continue into West Virginia. Tckma (talk) 18:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is still a problem --Tim Sabin (talk) 18:54, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks to whoever fixed it. Cramyourspam (talk) 15:39, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with SVG map 

message: This page needs a route description and a history, but I'm focusing on the lack of a route description. All I can think of is that it runs along the Appalachian Mountains, in some cases below some clouds, and has interchanges for service roads as well as a rest area in a low lying flat area. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  22:05, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route description needed
Talk:Greek wrestling

message: I added a working link for the PDF file with the research thesis in it referred to by the article.Kozushi (talk) 06:08, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

message: I can't find any citation for "Killa Milla", nor any fight stats for him on UFC or Sherdog websites. Who is he, how is he involved in the UFC, and why is that relevant to his expertise on ancient greek wrestling?Hexrei 18:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Currently the lead says
: A point was scored when one player touched the ground with his back, hip or shoulder,....
But the section Rules says
:A point can be scored in any of three ways: the opponent’s back touching the ground at any time,...
with no mention of a point for the opponent's hip or shoulder touching the ground. This discrepancy needs to be cleared up. Loraof (talk) 22:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy in statements of scoring 

message: The section Rules says
:The referee can at any time stop the match if s/he believes a point has been scored.
The wording s/he implies that some of the referees were female. I find that hard to believe. If none were female, s/he should be changed to he. Loraof (talk) 22:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Female referees?! 

message: Article cites “Martin” twice in MLA, no indication of the original source in end notes. Also, needs more citation help in general—it’s heavily reliant on Pausanias, not enough on scholarship. Ceschreck (talk) 18:11, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation issues
Talk:Wapping Tunnel

message: Is it the actual western portal of the Wapping tunnel that is visible at the end of Kings Dock Road? - I had always understood that the tunnel "proper" emerged below Upper Frederick Street, into a short (~35m) open-air section, in which the tracks split three ways before passing into Wapping Goods station via three separate, short tunnels under the mini-roundabout junction of Park Lane/Jamaica Street. If this is correct, it would be the middle one of these which can be seen at Kings Dock Road.
See this aerial photo at Multimap - the bit I'm referring to is the dark coloured triangle immediately to the right of the acute forked junction near the centre of the map. The red circle marker, on the other hand, is close to where the visible portal is located.
(Update: I've checked using GIS software, which on the one hand has better aerial photos and seems to confirm the existence of the open-air section, but on the other hand measures the length from Edge Hill cutting to Upper Frederick Street as 1923m, over 100m short of the official length, which therefore must include the extra section to Kings Dock Road. I suppose it's possible that the whole is considered a single tunnel, even in spite of such an opening?)
Quackdave 10:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Western Portal?

message: One user continually inserts a passage about a stadium for Everton FC and Clarence Dock. He has done this on a number of articles.  Clarence Dock is nowhere near the Wapping Tunnel.  The site is locked but the vandalized constant is still in the article. Please revert to the version before the vandalism. Thanks 212.139.118.236 (talk) 10:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism of article
Talk:Greengage

message: Just a few ideas —ExplorerCDT 21:51, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To do
Talk:Meyrick Chapman

message: This person seems like a non-notable athlete from 100 years ago. The article mentions that he did nit make it to the semifinals of an olympic event. Surely that's not what passes for notability nowadays. With 4 references, there must be more information.--Eva bd 21:48, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Olympic competitors are notable, whether from last year or 100 years ago.  For AfD precedent, please see Lecomte, Albert Baumann, and Christine Robinson's nominations. -- Jonel | Speak 01:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable
Talk:Reed Publishing

message: one of NZ's oldest publishers. Info as per sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Urythmic (talk • contribs) 
I guess they belong to Penguin now, because their website points to them. Can´t find any information about the what and when on their site, though. Anybody out there who knows more about the NZ editorial business?--193.254.183.243 (talk) 11:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Salomon Maimon

message: "'[...]Now I am going to tell you another story, also a true story, about a Jewish boy who lived in Poland in the second half of the eighteenth century. [...] This boy, Reuven, was brilliant, literally a genius. His name was Solomon, and later in life he changed his long Polish name to Maimon. When he was young, he found that the Talmud could not satisfy his hunger for knowledge. His mind would not let him rest. He wanted to know what was happening in the outside world. German was by then a great scientific and cultural language, and he decided to teach himself to read German. But even after he learned German he was not satisfied,  because the reading of secular books was forbidden. Finally at the age of twenty-five, he abandoned his wife and child and after many hardships came to Berlin where he joined a group of philosophers, read Aristotle, Maimonides, Spinoza, Leibniz, Hume and Kant, and began to write philosophical books. He had a great mind, but it never left him in peace. He wandered from city to city, never finding roots anywhere, never satisfied, and finally died at forty-seven on the estate of a kind-hearted Christian who had befriended him."
from The Chosen, by Chaim Potok, Chapter Six 
This seems important in some way. Dwarf Kirlston 17:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference in The Chosen

message: The correspondence bet. Kant and Maimon and Kant's letter to Rheinhold requires more context, see . Also the significance of Maimon's autobiography as a archetype should be discussed a bit. I'll try to get to it later. (Rischin mentions it in passing 1962, Socher treats it as a premise, but I am still looking for a through discussion)Oysvorf (talk) 07:05, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  kant's letter 

message: As long as the page name retains 'Salomon' According to the Germanic convention, the contents should adhere. Oysvorf (talk) 08:20, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Views of the significance of the autobiography are needed, but user:RachelCRose's contributions were an egregious violation of NPOV, and I removed it. Oysvorf (talk) 08:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiography. 

message: User:129.2.129.26 has now twice restored and expanded on WP:OR and WP:POV edits made by user:RachelCRose. The editorial commentary supplied in these edits do not reflect the introduction to the translation of the autobiography that they cite, nor do they reflects the contents of that biography. I will once again remove them. I am asking that these user(s) refrain from editing the article without discussion on this page. Oysvorf (talk) 16:15, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  User:129.2.129.26
Talk:St. Paul's High School (Winnipeg)

message: I am not familiar with this school, but are we sure that this "Flood" is a notable event? Wouldn't it be some kind of in-joke? The allusion to 450 lives having been destroyed makes one think so (hopefully!). --Goochelaar 22:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Flood?

message: I ask because I think not....142.68.48.107 23:56, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Duvie Westcott actually graduate from the school? 

message: I changed this slightly to indicate that the word President was added, but the title Director was not eliminated.  Basically the word 'Director' is a Jesuit term referring to 'Director of the Apostolate' whereas President is a civil (legal) term.  The actual reason I added 'President' was because I created a new position called Vice President, and it was felt if there was a Vice President, there should be a President.  I add that the equivalent position at Loyola High School in Montreal, also a Jesuit High School, has the title 'President', so while this modification did align St Paul's with American Jesuit Schools, that was not the principal reason.  J Mroz SJ 142.68.48.107 00:02, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  title 'President' 

message: This recipients of this award should not be posted on Wikipedia, it is certainly NOT information that is worthy of any encyclopedia. It is only one of many awarded and is no more significant than many of the others. Someone just wanted their name on Wikipedia, therefore I believe it should be deleted.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Monarch0300 (talk • contribs) 06:09, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Jesuit Secondary Education Award 
Talk:2007 World Men's Handball Championship

message: Is it neccessary to have the qualifying groups in the article? I would prefer having them separately. --Tone 22:13, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please add the tournament MVP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.172.141.13 (talk • contribs) 18:02, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled2

message: I removed 1 external broken link (*All games of the handball world championship as iCal-calendar) Julien Guyonnet 15/04/08 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.78.49 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled3
Talk:NGC 2264

message: I redirected "Snowflake Cluster" to point to NGC 2264. The Snowflake Cluster article previously consisted mainly of text copied and pasted from the 2005 Spitzer press release, and the designation "Snowflake Cluster" is used almost nowhere other than in that press release and other pages based on it. It doesn't seem necessary to have a separate page for the Snowflake Cluster, which is really just a part of NGC 2264. Aldebarium (talk) 18:21, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article is very confusing, referring to both a 'snowflake cluster' and a 'snowflake nebula' (in the image caption). It also says "For a cluster to be considered a Snowflake, it must remain in the original location the star was formed. " Which is essentially meaningless. Could someone with better understanding of these objects tidy the article up? Stub Mandrel (talk) 19:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snowflake Cluster redirect 

message: 1. When taking a look on W. Herschels original Catalouge, one can find a star cluster discovered in 01/1784 and another object (the nebula) discovered in 12/1785.
2. The original NGC by Dreyer notes: "Open cluster** ?neb?"
3. The modern revisited NGC (2021, by Steinicke) points out "type 4 = open cluster". 
So Herschel discovered 2 objects (other than said in source 7)
Dreyer was shure about the cluster when compiling the NGC, not about the nebula, so het attached the "?". 
The modern NGC sets NGC 2264 as type 4 'open cluster'.
So the source is wrong, according to primary sources and so the wikipedia-article is wrong. NGC 2264 referes only to that cluster and the nebula is not listed within the NGC directly. 
94.216.213.136 (talk) 02:39, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source [7] is wrong
Talk:City and Town Hall (Rochelle, Illinois)

message: This article has passed the GA noms. The following are bot-generated suggestions for improvment:
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Tarret 20:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Passed

message: I hate to point it out at this stage, but it should be either City and Town Hall, Rochelle, Illinois
or City and Town Hall (Rochelle, Illinois) ProfDEH (talk) 10:24, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly. I think that extra comma was just a typo. I've moved it. Station1 (talk) 21:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New name
Talk:NGC 2360

message: * See this Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:32, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Bookmark
Talk:Naples Mound 8

message: I have reverted the redirect of this article to Zelph. This is an article about a Havana Hopewell culture mound, not about a figure from Mormon history. It is on the National Register of Historic Places and deserves its own page as such. I have also reverted the 4 redirect pages of alternate names to go here as well. I have now watchlisted all 5 pages. Heironymous Rowe (talk) 09:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Zelph Redirect
Talk:NGC 246

message: I removed the following string of overkill from the "names" category of the info box, and added a reference to the SIMBAD record, which has at least most of them.  The note below was part of the string, in HTML comments.
names = NGC 246, GPM 11.763966-11.871916, PLX 152, RE J004703-115211, BD-12 134, GSC2 S0033000111, PMN J0047-1152, 2RXF J004703.4-115214, BPS CS 31062-0003, GSC 05272-01890, PN VV' 7, 1RXS J004703.1-115217, CCDM J00471-1152AB, HIC 3678, PN ARO 43, TD1 31081, CSI-12-00445, HIP 3678, PN VV 4, TYC 5272-1890-1, 2E 0044.5-1208, IDS 00420-1225, PN G118.8-74.7, UBV 644, 2E 178, IRAS 00445-1207, 2RE J0047-115, UBV M 5351, 2EUVE J0047-11.8, MCT 0044-1208, 2RE J004704-115215, UCAC2 27592055, EUVE J0047-11.8, PHL 829, RE J004702-115145, uvby98 610160829, GEN# -0.01200134, PK 118-74 1, RE J0047-115, WD 0044-121, Skull Nebula
note: above list contains three RE items with differing numbers... 
-- Elphion (talk) 20:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive names 

message: There's a long-standing suggestion to merge BD-12° 134 into this article.  That seems to make sense, but I can't discover whether the BD item refers to the nebula or the central star (HIP 3678), both, or neither.  (The SIMBAD entry for NGC 246 lists BD-12 134 as an associated ID, but it also lists HIP 3678.)  The coords given at BD-12° 134 appear to match the ones given here for the nebula, but the info box appears to refer to a star (and the link to SIMBAD there gives a completely different location, CD-58 3527 in the eta Car nebula). -- Elphion (talk) 21:54, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment - further comment is needed to tell whether a merge is necessary, perhaps informing a relevant topical WikiProject is the way to go. Quasihuman | Talk 18:01, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge BD-12° 134 here? 

message: I’m not sure what amateur astronomers refer to this as the Pac-Man nebula. NGC 281 is far more commonly referred to as the Pac-Man nebula, because the nebulosity resembles that characteristic circular shape with a wedge cut out. It even has an eye!
I think we should remove the notation that this is known as the Pac-Man nebula. I don’t see that reference among my local astronomy club or in the online community. Cecomp64 (talk) 17:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pac-Man?
Talk:Tandem Press

message: important independent NZ publisher. info see sources—Preceding unsigned comment added by Urythmic (talk • contribs) January 22, 2007
:Umm, two seem to be dead links. Got any others? -- OlEnglish (Talk) 09:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Sources

message: Virtually the entirety of this article is lifted verbatim from the company website's promotional text at http://www.tandempress.wisc.edu/ . --Tenebrae (talk) 16:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like the article was hijacked. I have restored the original article. The NZ press does not seem to have a current website, and may be defunct. -- Diannaa (talk) 00:15, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:NGC 2841

message: The colours seem to be pretty much reversed from every other (false) colour image of the galaxy on the internet. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 23:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The colours are not inverted. The image has just not been taken in the optical but in the mid-infrared at 3.6, 5.8 and 8.0µm. Med 08:23, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense, please disregard my ramblings. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 23:56, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The photo... 

message: Most other galaxy descriptions include a 'size' measure of diameter in light years.
How come no such measure here?
Several other sources state "150,000 light years across" which make it larger than our own Milky Way.
Or am I missing something? 2600:8800:785:9400:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 20:54, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size ?
Talk:Georges Vacher de Lapouge

message: This anthropologist is being sold far short of his true length. He contrasted and discussed far more than three "races". The list from just his one book about the social role of "Aryans" is Homo alpinus, Homo arcticus, Homo asiaticus, Homo contractus, Homo Dinaricus, Homo Europæus, Homo hyperboreus, Homo Japeticus, Homo mediterraneus, Homo meridionalis, Homo nuba, Homo priscus, Homo scythicus, Homo spelæus, Acrogonus, race de Furfooz. Why does the French version of this page have many more details of his career, travels, and family than this page? 174.65.105.116 (talk) 16:13, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Add more information if you have citations to support this.Mcc1789 (talk) 02:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Homo europaeus,  alpinus,  mediterraneus?
Talk:Ashley the Smoking Car

message: I could really use some help with this. I'm the only one who seems to care about these pages. The Quidam 22:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm working my way through... Mazz0626 14:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help 
Talk:NGC 2997

message: According to several other websites that I've checked, there are two things "wrong" with this article.
First, the photo's orientation.  It needs a vertical (top/bottom) flip since "north" is almost always at the top' not at the bottom.  In fact, all the websites I checked had the photo flipped with the bright spot in the upper right corner actually being in the lower right corner.  That's because most sites identify the bright spot as a rising Moon - - - and I've never known the Moon to rise from the upper part of the sky.
Second, those same sites give the distance of the galaxy at 140 million light years; not the 25 mentioned in the lede nor the 39.8 in the Infobox.  And even if the "140" is not correct, why is there any difference between the numbers in the lede and the Infobox?
Can anyone verify these two items and make the necessary corrections in the article?
Just curious. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 01:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture orientation and distance
Talk:Millstone Bluff

message: Sorry, but this is a bit confusing. I've just been to Millstone Bluff this weekend. It is marked in the major Shawnee tourist maps. Has a big parking lot and lots of information boards. It seems to me that the Address Restricted entry in the NRIS is a bit outdated. --Dschwen 20:53, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Address Restricted    
Talk:Yugo Florida

message: We need a photo of a new Zastava Florida In on the infobox, not an old 1987 Yugo Florida. Anyone have a photo that can be used on this page? Zastavafan76 22:24, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:NGC 3532

message: This alternative name was in the article before, and has since been removed on suspicion that the name in fact originated here.  But it really doesn't matter where it originated, it is now in general use -- appearing in WikiSky and in the following description from ESO:  http://www.eso.org/public/images/potw1246a/ and this APOD: http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap100226.html , not to mention a variety of other space photo captions. -- Elphion (talk) 17:42, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The "Wishing Well Cluster" was named for fraudulent advertising of jewellery, and the site was linked through Wikipedia. The IAU have been made well aware of this. Others have adopted this without knowing the fraud being conducted here. Arianewiki1 (talk) 18:09, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What fraud are you talking about?  Can you provide details?  Is there an official disavowal of the name?  It seems to be very widespread now.  -- Elphion (talk) 18:29, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

text: If both ESO and APOD use this name, then it doesn't matter if it did originate here, it's in widespread use. If it wasn't in widespread use, then it could be removed, but as it is in widespread use, we'd be picking and choosing instead of presenting the world as it is. -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 07:41, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: What can you do when you know that the name is fraudulent. It was purposely removed from SIMBAD for this very reason! It was named this just to sell stinking jewellery! I did notified as many organisations as I could, but you can't easily remove everything. Yet now you know better, and these source quoted were actually duped. Blinding believing everything on the internet. These edits were made in WP:GF not WP:POV. Stupidity just perpetuates the myth, which is a major failure of encyclopedia like this one. This is why people just use Wikipedia for promotion, because they just know they can get away with it; and anyone who knows better, is basically called in the open a out-and-out liar! Arianewiki1 (talk) 13:38, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: In the first place, it's not clear that it is "fraudulent" at all.  We've had this discussion before:  the evidence you mentioned is hardly conclusive, and you have not elaborated on it (though I have asked).  But that doesn't matter anymore; the point is that it is now a well-established name.  All popular names get coined somehow; they are not mediated by IAU.  If they catch on, they get used, regardless of the details of the coining.  The sources were not "duped", they just liked the name -- and this is why things catch on.  I have not attributed bad faith to you (quite the opposite -- I know you are trying to keep WP honest) -- but in this case you seem to be unaware (or unwilling to accept) that this is by now the most commonly-used name for this cluster, regardless of its putative shady origins. -- Elphion (talk) 14:38, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wishing Well Cluster