lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Saint Martin impact structure

message: Someone may want to apply crater template

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Crater Infobox? 

message: The "Hypothetical multiple impact event" section ends with this statement: "However, refined ages for the mentioned impact craters that differ by several million years contradict the multiple impact hypothesis." The paper referred to here does specifically address inconsistencies in previous estimates of the dates of these events. Is there even more recent research? Please cite if known. Thanks. 71.197.166.72 (talk) 06:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Refined ages"
Talk:Slate Islands (Ontario)

message: I've tried to organise this article a little better by adding headings.  I added a number of citations too.  The article used to say that the rock was mainly metamorphic, and was not cited.  The Ontario Parks website says the rock is mainly volcanic and sedimentary.  I'm not a geology student, I'm not sure if metamorphic is the same as volcanic, but I know it's definitely not sedimentary.  So I changed it and cited the Park website. If anyone can substantiate the original claim please improve the article and add a citation. Zatoichi26 (talk) 02:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I fixed this - confirmed the rock type underlying the islands and cited the EG Pye book. Zatoichi26 (talk) 01:46, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: March 30, 2008 edits

message: Someone may want to apply crater template

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Crater Infobox?
Talk:Pro-war rhetoric

message: Is this yet more proof of Wiki's socialist/left wing bias? I think so. The reference materials used for this article are nothing more than manuals on how to be a left winger. Ymous 14:15, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why No Anti-War Rhetoric Page? 

message: A declaration of war is an official act, usually not a rhetoric event, apart from the public announcement which addresses the masses to mobilize support. However, the popular "pro-war" rhetoric which isn't reflecting indoctrination and propaganda, is about patriotism, and the duties to fulfill to serve the country. Please try to edit less politicized. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 05:26, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duties 

message: The article on Ronald Reid´s Three Topoi is very similar in content with the one on Pro-war rhetoric. In addition, it is an orphan. I propose to keep the Pro-war rhetoric article because it has a more general title and has a relevant number of incoming links Ruud Buitelaar (talk) 23:09, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 20:44, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Ronald Reid's Three Topoi]] into [[Pro-war rhetoric]]
Talk:Punkeydoodles Corners

message: What's the odds on this being a native name? A lot of native names have been mangled in various parts of the world, and sound odd to English speakers' ears.--MacRusgail 18:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've always heard the Yankee Doodle legend. I doubt it's a native name though- I don't think that there were any nearby settlements, and nobody seems to have noticed a resemblance to native words.--Wafulz 18:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know from experience that Gaelic names can end up something completely different. In North America and Australia, native names end up really mangled. I'm not sure how "yankee" turns into "punkey" though --MacRusgail 19:04, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

text: My other thought is that it might be a mangling of a French name - "doo" as in "du" (of the). Makes as much sense as the Yankee Doodle story.--MacRusgail 19:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Folk etymology
Talk:Portugal–United Kingdom relations

message: I put forth a proposition to merge the page Anglo-Portuguese alliance into this page. Many of the same topics are covered and the same infobox is used. 1.618033 goldensqᴉɹʇuoɔ 23:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: agree. very good idea. Rjensen (talk) 23:31, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Delamar Dry Lake

message: I added more history from the X-15 usage of Delamar.  Note that the Delamar Dry Lake Drop Zone' is supported by the existing reference at airfields-freeman.com .  I also added a note and reference about the eyewitness report of falling debris seen from Delamar Lake as shown in the Columbia Accident Investigation Board Final Report. Ikluft (talk) 01:38, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: nice work!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Filamentofzodd (talk • contribs) 21:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  added X-15 and CAIB history 

message: This page was originally started as an airport stub.  But it's an awkward fit since it was basically an imaginary airport on a dry lakebed, specifically for the X-15 program.  As more info got added to the article, it's been more about the lakebed.  After all, no improvements or facilities have ever been built there.  So it seems to make sense that this page should move to focus on the dry lakebed as more details arrive in the future.  I propose to rename the page to Delamar Dry Lake and reorganize the contents so that Delamar Lake Landing Strip is a section of it.  Since Delamar Dry Lake is already a redirect page pointing here, the move would in effect swap the page with one of its redirects.  Any questions, objections or comments? Ikluft (talk) 08:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed renaming to Delamar Dry Lake
Category talk:Wikipedians with JD degrees

message: Just in case there's any confusion in what I meant, Wisconsin is the only state in the United States where graduates from the state's two law schools (U. of Wisconsin or Marquette) are automatically admitted to the Wisconsin bar (only).  If a Wisconsin law school graduate wants to go into another jurisdiction, they must take the appropriate bar exam.  Students from law schools outside of Wisconsin need to take the Wisconsin bar.  This is the odd exception to the United States.  Here's a blog reference I pulled just for loose confirmation. --Bobak 14:45, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wisconsin
Talk:UIQ

message: I merged List of UIQ 3 Phones into this article. If someone wants a category instead of the list, please go ahead. --B. Wolterding 14:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

message: http://www.symbian.com/news/cn/2007/cn20079462.html
UIQ to be established as vendor independent open OS interface
Mathiastck 18:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motorola to join Sony Ericsson in ownership of UIQ 

message: I'm not sure if I understand correctly the sentence:
"UIQ 3.1 is the first Non-Touch screen based version of the platform"
Why "Non-Touch"?
All phones with UIQ 3.1 supports touch screens as  a main way of navigation
Varciasz (talk) 23:04, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Touch screen in UIQ 3.1
Talk:Aberdeen doctors

message: Were these guys all saints? if not the group should not be in Category:Anglican saints.Kent Witham (talk) 07:33, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously. You'd be better asking the user who added the category to confirm this. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 07:37, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Saints?
Talk:Plasma Cutter

message: No it should not be moved over.  It is a term for "plasma cutting" which does have its own page. 
See here for a reference:
:http://science.howstuffworks.com/plasma-cutter.htm
A manufacturer of "plasma cutter"
:http://www.millerwelds.com/products/plasma/
john 15:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you distinguish between this article and plasma cutting right in the article?   At the very least there should be a see also link to plasma cutting Samw 00:47, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia is case sensitive (except for the first letter) and distinguishes between Plasma cutter and Plasma Cutter.   IMHO if one redirects to plasma cutting both should.  If Plasma cutter and Plasma Cutter are the same, Wikipedia naming conventions dictate Plasma Cutter should redirect to Plasma cutter.   Let me know what you decide and I can help with setting up the redirects.  Samw 03:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[plasma cutting]]
Talk:U.S. Troop Readiness, Veterans' Care, Katrina Recovery, and Iraq Accountability Appropriations Act, 2007

message: I don't have the time now to work on this, but can soon.  I would put the  tag on it, but don't know on the appropriateness of it at this juncture.  This article has fantastic amounts of information which can go into it, and unless it already has been worked on under another title, really should be written.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 15:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  under construction 

message: For one thing, the article mentiones Articles 1, 2, and 7. What happened to sections 3-6? Also make sure it's cleanly cut and refering to the final version in summary and in legislative history any major differences between the vetoed version and the singed version. Jon 15:08, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: expand article
Talk:Yume Miru Kusuri: A Drug That Makes You Dream

message: Requesting a plot synopsis.
:I'll try soon, but it's sort of hard to go any farther with the branching plot and all. Voretus 15:16, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: -One thing you should do is do something about the fact that this wiki page mercilessly spoils the game.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.142.172.148 (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have specific instance please list them and it might be possible to remove or rephrase some of them, but Wikipedia doesn't avoid spoilers.陣内Jinnai 20:33, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

text: I reworked plot & gameplay somewhat. I hid the path text till I can better review it to see how best to incorporate it into the text.陣内Jinnai 08:57, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoil

message: It's been a while since I played this, but I don't remember Nekoko ever thinking of Kouhei as a monster. Also, the tree-climbing scene mentioned in the "unhappy" ending was one of the pivotal points iirc, not just limited to that story branch. Unhappy = she climbed it and disappeared; otherwise she backs down.
- Truce (talk) 08:15, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nekoko's path 

message: I always thought the lack of the cliche non-blood sister option despite the presence of such a character was a deliberate joke.71.225.100.80 (talk) 07:19, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aya Route 

message: I heard rumors that there is a manga and probably an anime, are these rumors bs? I cant seem to confirm this. 200.126.199.141 (talk) 12:16, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manga and Anime?
Talk:Watton-at-Stone

message: I have built a website for Watton At Stone which portrays life in the village through a pictorial guide. I would appreciate a link to the website at the following url: 
http://www.wattonatstone.info/watton_web/wattonStart.html Martse5310 15:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your site seems to meet the requirements of WP:EL, so I have added it to the external links, thanks! Would you be prepared to release one of your images under the GFDL, so we can add it directly to the article? — BillC  talk 11:32, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Manor High School, Oadby

message: Please don't delete the text from the manor high website,  I've sent an email to wikimedia from my manorhigh.sch.uk email address explaining that its use will be permitted under GFDL Armo 15:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Manor High is the largest Middle school in England and so one of the few middle schools which has an inherent notability. It's a shame, therefore, to see that the article is still just a stub. I will do what I can to flesh out some detail, but it would be great if someone with local knowledge and access to local resources were able to add something to it. Tafkam (talk) 17:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effort to improve
Talk:Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999

message: Why has the main body of the article disappeared? R.e.doolan 00:03, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

message: Why was the 1993 regulation repealed and replaced by the 1999 version? Was there a cock-up by the UK legislators? Did the EU demand proper implementation? I am aware the Consumer Rights Act 2105 has repealed the 1999 SI, but I'd still like to know the story behind the repeal! Arrivisto (talk) 18:15, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was the 1993 regulation repealed?
Talk:Saša Dragin

message: I've removed text relating to Dragin's work in government and the reasons for his departure due to the unsourced, non-neutral point of view expressed in the text. If it can be sourced and presented in a more balanced manner, that would be good but really requires an editor with the relevant knowledge and language skills.--CharlieDelta (talk) 06:37, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed unsourced non-neutral content
Talk:Alton Steel

message: I suggest we have just one article on the company, rather than a separate article for Laclede Steel.  Both are the same company, but just a new name.  I think it would be better to have one longer article than two short stubs. --Aude (talk) 15:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. Of course, I only saw this article after I had written a short stub for Laclede Steel. CloudNine 16:02, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That will work.  Thanks for writing the stub. :) --Aude (talk) 16:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Laclede Steel broke into pieces in the bankruptcy.  Alton Steel is just one of the components.  I think Laclede Steel should probably have its own history.14:26, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Laclede Steel broke into pieces - this article may not be the right name
Talk:WebMethods Flow

message: Reviewing this I've got some problems with how I originally wrote this: I've referenced my blog on the webMethods technology, which may not be a great idea given that it's not a mainstream site (but some of this information will probably never be found on a mainstream site). I'll leave it in until I can get some information to replace this with.. NathanLee 15:31, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Joseph Schröter

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 15:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, narrowly a Start -- Yamara 15:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Male oral contraceptive

message: Much of this article is original research.  I have done my best to reduce the amount of speculation, per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball.  Joie de Vivre 16:00, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: An interesting issue surrounding male oral contraceptives would be to determine whether they could ever contribute to reducing the number of abortions in countries where the abortion rate is especially alarming. It makes sense that if men don't ejaculate for chemical reasons, women would have much less chances of getting pregnant, and consequently of obtaining an abortion. ADM (talk) 09:42, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reduced abortion rates

message: Certain sexologists have claimed that the commercialization of male oral contraceptives could change the way men experience orgasms, given that these would chemically prevent men from ejaculating and would allow them to experience a greater number of dry orgasms. This could maybe be mentioned in the article, since it has been the subject of a good deal of scientific research in recent years.  ADM (talk) 13:10, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dry orgams
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Nimrauko

message: User:Nimrauko
      run at Thu May 17 15:34:48 2007 GMT
Mainspace	8
Talk:	9
User talk:	7
User:	3
Wikipedia:	7
avg edits per page	2.62
earliest	17:03, 22 August 2005
number of unique pages	13
total	34
2005/8 	2 	
2005/9 	0 	
2005/10 	0 	
2005/11 	0 	
2005/12 	0 	
2006/1 	0 	
2006/2 	0 	
2006/3 	0 	
2006/4 	0 	
2006/5 	0 	
2006/6 	0 	
2006/7 	0 	
2006/8 	0 	
2006/9 	0 	
2006/10 	0 	
2006/11 	0 	
2006/12 	1 	
2007/1 	2 	
2007/2 	7 	
2007/3 	0 	
2007/4 	0 	
2007/5 	22 	
Nimrauko's editcount summary stats as of 16:34, May 17th 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 15:36, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ekwulumili

message: This article currently fails WP:V and as such, its notability is not established. Please work to ensure that all material is verified by references to reliable sources. Adrian M. H. 15:40, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorial shortcomings
Talk:2007 Cannes Film Festival

message: I tried to make some significant changes to the links, as before things like Breath and Run were just going to the nouns (Breath or Run), which didn't seem to help anyone. Some of the alterations:
1.) I checked past Cannes pages to see how they were formatted and stuck to the president.
2.) I added links to the directors. I know this shows a lot of red and blue, but for the most part the directors are the only ones who even have an article to link to.
3.) I moved the country of the film to the end of the line. I didn't add links because that seemed redundant. I also didn't add links to nationalities for the jury members, though I did link to their names.
4.) Wasn't sure if the br tags were needed with a bullet list, but I left them in.
General question: Some of the films are attributed as either United Kingdom (too broad) or Hong Kong (too specific). I don't want to change the UK ones to England/Wales/Scotland/etc because I don't know for sure what is what, but couldn't we at least alter Hong Kong to China?
More nitpicky: Jane Birkin links to a singer. I don't think this is the same person, but I'm not sure. And Looking Glass (film) just goes to the disambiguation tag.
Feel free to revert back to the old changes if this is version is too... colorful. --Alaaious 15:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In regards to Hong Kong, it should be left alone. Many filmmakers still regard themselves as part of the Hong Kong film community (what's left of it) as opposed to being Chinese. Hong Kong has been part of China politically for only 10 years now and will not be "officially" governed by Beijing until 2047.  RoyBatty42 19:12, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link Clean Up
Talk:Colt 1851 Navy Revolver

message: :Have been planning on writing this article for some time, but looks like you have made a good start.  Yes, some formatting will be needed, but that is easy enough to fix.  Thanks!  Yaf 05:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Hello, I just wanted to ask if this long sentence “sometimes erroneously referred to as "Colt Revolving Belt Pistol of Naval Caliber" or "of Navy Caliber" (Naval is heavy gun and Navy Size Caliber was termed later for another Colt model),” is really necessary, and what purpose does it serve? Should it remain, why or why not? In my opinion, it seems to serve little purpose, but I’d like to hear others’ thoughts Aliy Dawut (talk) 19:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessary information in header?
Talk:Yatiri

message: this distinction is nonsense, itself a result of modern western thinking. The two are *not* mutually exclusive, and one is not more European/Andean than the other. Both Europe and South America have and have always had both communities and individuals. Both forces shape their history and culture, as is the case all over the world. --86.135.180.9 00:53, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "individualism" vs. "community"
Talk:Kernel principal component analysis

message: There is something wrong with the example given. It looks like the kernel matrix was not centered before eigendecomposition. Is this a acceptable modification of the algorithm? If it is, in which cases it makes sense to do not center the kernel matrix before other calculations?
See more on: http://agbs.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/km/bb/showthread.php?tid=1062  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.92.120.245 (talk) 01:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example of kPCA projection 

message: What is the source and justification for this "centralization" technique?  can anyone expand this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisalvino (talk • contribs) 21:34, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centralization 

message: Maybe it is me .. but I can't find where Y, in k(x,y) is defined ... ? So I've no idea what  y is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eep1mp (talk • contribs) 14:22, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The mystery of Y 

message: Should the normalization condition on the eigenvectors include a transpose on the first eigenvector?
1 = {a^k}^T K a^k instead of 1 = a^k K a^k.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.17.134.225 (talk) 15:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Normalization of eigenvectors
Talk:Mecasermin rinfabate

message: Nice start. Thanks for putting this up69.134.50.67 15:51, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nice start
Talk:Sense about Science

message: Some of these  included misleading edit summaries that it was all primary sourced, which was not the case.  These edits were by Lmatt, eventually blocked for disruptive editing.  I'm posting the diff here so other editors can eventually audit these changes.  Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 01:12, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to audit
Talk:Gateway to the Americas International Bridge

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—198.228.216.148 (talk) 06:00, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've tweaked the coordinates slightly, but they were basically correct. If there is a specific error that you think needs to be addressed, please repost the  template with a clear explanation. Deor (talk) 11:43, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: It is an international bridge, but its correct name is Gateway to the Americas Bridge (without Intern'l). See http://ftp.dot.state.tx.us/pub/txdot-info/iro/international-bridges.pdf and https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/local-media-release/gsa-cbp-advise-temporary-rerouting-gateway-americas-bridge-northbound. --AHert (talk) 21:09, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gateway to the Americas Bridge
Talk:Laredo–Colombia Solidarity International Bridge

message: The name of this bridge is: Laredo - Colombia Solidarity International Bridge.  Although the city of Laredo tends to not bother with the official name too often, the Texas Dept. of Transportation properly lists the name.  To call it the Colombia - Solidarity International Bridge doesn't make sense.  It raises the question, solidarity with whom?  The significance of this bridge that sets it apart from the other international bridges in Laredo is that this is the only bridge that connects Laredo, Webb County, and Texas to the Mexican state of Nuevo Leon.  All other Laredo bridges connect Laredo and Texas with the Mexican state of Tamaulipas.  The Colombia Bridge is special because of this difference and the name of the bridge relfects the strong connection (solidarity) between the people of Laredo, Texas and the people of Colombia, Nuevo Leon.  To reiterate, the official name of this bridge is Laredo - Colombia Solidarity International Bridge.  I will be implementing this change shortly.
216.81.81.84 (talk) 09:16, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Is Not Properly Named 