Talk:Global justice movement

message: Please see my explanation at Talk:Anti-globalization
- VoluntarySlave 06:54, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverted to 15 August 2005 

message: Regardless of their wish to distinguish themselves from the term "anti-globalization", I think that both this term and Movement of Movements belong within the anti-globalization article. All of the various caveats, such as their reasons for rejecting globalization, can be covered in a new section in that article.
-Juansmith 22:17, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very belatedly, I agree that this should be merged into Anti-globalization movement. I'm not aware of any work on the topics that refer to the anti-globalisation and global justice movements as separate movements, rather than as different names for a single movement. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:51, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[Anti-Globalization]]

message: This article should be moved to Global justice movement, per Wikipedia:NC#Lowercase_second_and_subsequent_words_in_titles. Comments? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  22:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Especially since it's a pretty vague term. 85.76.80.10 (talk) 09:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Strongly disagree - this implies that it is a movement for global justice and would be misleading. If the article implies that an organisation calling itself 'Global Justice Movement' is a movement for global justice it is by definition not NPOV, by not reflecting the views of those who see it as not being for global justice according to their definition. To add, the naming policy specifically states that proper nouns must have all words capitalized, and unless there is only one definition of 'global justice', then a particular and specific interpretation must be called 'Global Justice Club' because it refers to a specific group. E.g. "The University Societies of London" and "The university societies of London" are linguistically two different things.90.220.248.114 (talk) 20:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Your example is actually an excellent argument for decapitalization. I don't know if it was around when you made this comment, but there is currently an organization called The Global Justice Movement. This article is not about that organization, but the movement as a whole. Assuming I remember to do so, I'll make this change in a day or two if there are no further objections. Also, feel free to preempt me on this. --BDD (talk) 21:10, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

text: Okay, I hadn't even noticed the organization was already in the external links. So let's make a decision. Is this about "a network or constellation of globalized social movements" or just the one? --BDD (talk) 21:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Over half a year later, I'm going to be bold and act on this. The article describes a "network" (cf. Civil rights movement, Women's liberation movement), and capitalization could cause confusion with a specific group with the same name, which itself may merit its own article in time. --BDD (talk) 19:43, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decapitalize 

message: Maybe the article could reflect that the definition of justice is completely individual, and that an organisation simply calling itself "Global Justice Movement" does not mean that it is a movement for global justice in any way, shape or form? I have even seen articles referring to this without even capitalising the G, J and M, so as to indirectly imply that the propositions represent a nonpartial and independent view of what "justice" is. E.g. if a movement called itself the "Global Health Movement" and argued for removing immigrants from a nation, I am sure it wouldn't be listed under GHM in Wikipedia (or be referred to in sentences as 'the global health movement' or 'a movement for global health'. Maybe the article should mention that most of the propositions of the Global Justice Movement are heavily disputed by a number of people as representing 'justice'?90.220.248.114 (talk) 17:58, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No uniform definition of 'justice' 

message: Global Justice Movement →  – See section "Decapitalize" above. I wasn't able to move the page myself due to the decapitalized version existing as a redirect. BDD (talk) 19:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done by TexasAndroid. Jafeluv (talk) 01:53, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Global justice movement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051219063747/http://www.daysofdissent.org.uk/berlin.htm to http://www.daysofdissent.org.uk/berlin.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: — Assignment last updated by Pitbulls004 (talk) 03:11, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Economics of Social Justice and Injustice