lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Judiciary of Texas

message: Why would a County attorney represent the deputy sheriff in JP court? The county court sould be the court it is appealed to.
Is this a waste of tax payers money to have a county attorney in JP court in the first place?  Why would he be there? Never seen this before. Would welcome any comments.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.45.83.137 (talk) 03:11, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why would a County attorney be in JP court? 

message: Extremely poorly written article, by someone with an agenda see example below, worst ive seen on wikipedia, this article needs some help!
...The poor quality of Texas justice has been blamed on the state's shortage of proper law schools and law libraries, as well as the traditional preference of Texans for "'self-help' justice as practiced in the courts of 'Judge Winchester' or 'Judge Lynch.'"[3] More recently, it has been pointed out that in Texas, victims of intrafamilial violence are sometimes required to cover the legal expenses of their family members who are being prosecuted for beating them up.[4]
Kain77502 (talk) 15:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and perception 

message: The first paragraph in the "Judges" section includes the sentence, "Judges may be removed by voters in retention elections, by trial by jury, or by legislative address or impeachment if state judges.[22]"  First, there are NO retention elections in Texas.  Go read the state constitution.  It is nowhere in there.  Second, the term "legislative address" is unexplained and appears to this reader to be meaningless.  In Texas there is a "State Commission on Judicial Conduct" (SCJC) created by a constitutional amendment in 1965.  It deals with complaints about judicial behavior and can issue discipline rulings in the case of any .  Ultimately, it can recommend removal of a judge to a special seven-judge panel whose decision can be appealed to the Supreme Court. See http://www.scjc.texas.gov/faqs/http://www.scjc.texas.gov/faqs/
There are only four ways to remove a judge in Texas, by a trial before the Supreme Court for district court judges only, by the voters in a regular election (if the judge is elected--some are not), by the seven judge panel upon recommendation of the SCJC for any judge (see http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/CN/htm/CN.5.htm#123127.112202)http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/CN/htm/CN.5.htm#123127.112202 and by impeachment by the legislature for certain higher-level judges.
I have not read the textbook source cited in footnote 22 but I suspect that it contains erroneous information even though it is supposedly tailored to Texas. In recent years I have found textbooks and other educational materials to be increasingly inaccurate and unreliable.
Please clean this entry up. It does a disservice to your readers by containing false information, i.e., there are no retention elections in Texas.
Bill Eastland (talk) 16:47, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Section "Judges" under "Officers" is incorrect
Talk:Cribb Island, Queensland

message: I'm currently researching this article.  I'm trying to have certain documents cleared by the national archives.  They're slow to respond. Factoid Killer 03:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: hi, I moved a couple of the external links to references. the remaining one is broken (18/02/2011). Kathodonnell (talk) 10:31, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: moved external links

message: I am not quite sure what this sentence means: In 1970, the Commonwealth Government proceeded to resume land on the island for the purpose of upgrading the airport.
I presume this is "Australian English" for something like, "In 1960, the Government of Australia started to purchase land on the island to upgrade the airport". 
It might be better to write this so it was more easily understood.---Filll (talk | wpc) 04:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure if it is Australian English or not, but here "resumes" means the government forces you to give up your land and pays you compensation. It's not that they purchase land that is for sale. I'll think of a better way to say it. Kerry (talk) 08:59, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing English
Talk:Antipata, Pylaros

message: I moved the page here from  Antipata Pylarou, basically because in the article Pylaris it is spelled that way.  However, I did find numerous results on Google for both spellings.  Because of this I am going to include a note at the beginning of the article stating the alternate spelling.CharacterZero 03:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Beta C-Mag

message: It says that a fully loaded c-mag would weigh the same as three fully loaded 30-round mags. That doesn't make sense.
100 rounds weighs more 90 rounds of 5.56mm ammunition, I would assume they meant four.
Beta C-Mags are made of polymer, that might take the weight down a little, compared to regular steel mags.
Keep in mind that 'three fully loaded 30-round mags' are the weight of 90 rounds and the weight of three empty steel magazines. These three empty magazines may very well weigh more than 10 rounds and a bit more. So thus a 100 round C-Mag made of light polymer would weigh less than the heavy steel.
>>>Unless you are referring to the limited numbers of HK PI mags (which are steel), the mag bodies are aluminum, not steel.<<<
This page needs updating, the 1994 Clinton Ban (for lack of better terminology on my part) has long since passed.
Added as many sources as I could find. I couldn't find any info on GPM-02-0217 or the claims made in the tolerances section. Hopefully someone else will have better luck. Jirt 20:46, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Weight

message: I think the article would benefit from a short section regarding the variants.  That is different weapons systems (Mini-14, etc.) and calibers (9x19mm NATO, 7.62 NATO).  Thoughts? Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 20:09, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the variants in a specific caliber use the same base.  Only the feed towers are swapped.  --D.E. Watters (talk) 01:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variants 

message: Moved content below from article. Tags re citations/references date back to late 2010, and link to GPM-02-017 is dead (only search results for it for were references to this article). --Cawpycat 23:54, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced/unreferenced material 

message: Since the JS 9 mm, the Daewoo K7 and the VBR-Belgium PDW can use magazines from the MP5, Uzi and Glock respectively, then I guess they accept C-MAG magazine, don't they? Furthermore, can all the STANAG magazine weapons accept C-MAG magazines as well? --Ts7946 (talk) 12:00, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional weapons
Talk:Fort Worth Stockyards

message: Hi, I notice that the image used for the "Entrance to Fort Worth Stockyards" is dated 1999 and the street is somewhat hidden by the cars parked.  I was at the Fort Worth Stockyards in 2005 and took a photo of the same street view with the entrance arch and there are very few cars present, showing a bit more of the of the landscape of the area.  If anyone is interested, I could replace the imagine with this updated one.  Please let me know what thoughts the community has regarding this idea. --4tiggy (talk) 04:46, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Update image of "Entrance to Fort Worth Stockyards"

message: The stockyards have a lot of cool things to show off.  Suggest someone start a Gallery section to place the current photos in and add more.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.172.19.51 (talk) 15:13, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery
Talk:Texas Archive War

message: I removed the headings in this article.  First, it's only six paragraphs long, and second, they seemed forced and artificial.  Headings should be used when someone may want to read only a part of an article or are looking for some certain aspect.  In this case, if you don't read the whole (short) thing, then you're lost.  Paxsimius 13:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Texas School Book Depository

message: The article says that Oswald worked at the depository as a "holiday-rush temporary employee". Why would a school book warehouse need temporary employees for the holiday rush? Were people ordering school textbooks as Christmas gifts? I would think that a school book warehouse would have its biggest rush for books in August and September. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 12:51, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If its not sourced then its dubious. In fact the entire section is without sources. I don't think you would have too much trouble if you removed the claim. JOJ Hutton 12:59, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Holiday rush?

message: The owner of the Texas School Book Depository, David Harold Byrd, was CEO at Chance Vought Corp. Vought was a huge defense contractor which had sold thousands of aircraft to the US government but its contracts were expiring in the late 50's and early 60's. LTV Corp aquired Vought in 1960. LTV was a Texas company (connected to LBJ). 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vought
Shortly after the assassination of JFK, 3 months, LBJ signed a huge new contract with Byrd for the A7 Corsair II "which would become heavily engaged in a variety of close support and strike missions during the Vietnam War". The Dallas economy benefitted greatly.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-7_Corsair_II
http://www.madcowprod.com/09082009.html
Byrd also had a personal connection to Lee Harvey Oswald. Byrd was commander of the Texas and Louisiana Civil Air Patrols. Oswald trained with the latter group.
I think the School Book Depository building article should list some of Byrd's connections.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.53.82.73 (talk) 21:23, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Byrd was a co-founder of CAP, according to the wikipedia article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Harold_Byrd But what evidence is there that he was "commander" of the Texas and Louisiana CAP in 1955 when Oswald at age 16 was for a few months a member working under David Ferrie? 75.51.148.161 (talk) 06:43, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Owner of the building 

message: The stated floor area of the building, "Floor area	10,000 sq. ft. (929 m2)", is incorrect and should be changed. The footprint of the building itself is 100'x100' (10,000 sq. ft.), but this would only apply to a single floor. According to https://tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/jdt01, the building, 7 stories tall with a basement, covers 80,000 sq. ft.
208.81.32.206 (talk) 14:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: , I also changed feet to primary measurement. Sir Joseph (talk) 17:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 May 2016 

message: The page says "The Texas School Book Depository Company moved out in 1970 and the building was sold at auction to Aubrey Mayhew, a Nashville, Tennessee music producer and collector of Kennedy memorabilia, by the owner D. H. Bard" Isn't the correct name D.H. Byrd? See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Harold_Byrd  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.51.148.161 (talk) 06:38, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  D H Bard
Talk:Louise Mountbatten

message: "According to Queen Margrethe II of Denmark it was very difficult for Louise to fill the shoes of her husband's first wife." And did Margrethe happen to mention that is was her own mother who caused much of the difficulty for Louise? She caused so much trouble, in fact, that she began to be sent every summer to visit her mother's family in England to give her father and stepmother a break from her. 76.202.192.102 (talk) 01:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queen Consort
Talk:.bd

message: Can we have more information on .bd? For example the dispute between the industry and the government of Bangladesh which took so long for .bd to come live. --Abdulha (talk) 11:58, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: bhaktabahadurraj 103.72.72.134 (talk) 08:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  bhaktabahadurraj 

message: I believe these two second-level domain names were added to the article by @TanvirBD, in this revision. However, I cannot find any information regarding those, only a few websites that mirror Wikipedia content, as well as some hosting/domain registration websites that list domain names. I guess they have copied the content from here anyway.
Even the list provided by Bangladesh Telecommunications Company does not include them. 
@TanvirBD, could you please provide some resources about those two second-level domain names? Otherwise, we might need to remove them from the list. Hocu (talk) 17:41, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  sw.bd and tv.bd
Talk:Texas Student Media

message: Why is there no mention of this in the list? I believe there are a few other publications not listed; do they not meet certain citeria? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.71.245.81 (talk • contribs)}.
:Bat City Review is published by the Department of English at UT Austin. As far as I can tell, they are neither published nor printed by Texas Student Media. — Rebelguys2 talk 04:08, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bat City Review
Talk:William Powers Jr.

message: Given the facts in Wikipedia's "Enron Scandal" section, it is surprising to see that his apparent efforts to aid Enron at the time it was going down are not being further examined here.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Ykral (talk • contribs) 10:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Enron-related statements by Powers

message: This article references "Dr." William Powers Jr. but I can't find any evidence that he holds a doctorate other than a J.D., which doesn't entitle one to use the "Dr." prefix.  Those references ought to be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.71.158.201 (talk) 23:04, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is Powers referred to as "Dr."?

message: I don't know that the president of UT did not work at U of M, but I do know that a different Dr. William Powers who happened to receive his PhD from UT in engineering in 1968 was a professor there from 1968-1980 http://www.linkedin.com/pub/william-powers/16/201/540?_mSplash=1.  I was a student.99.62.145.133 (talk) 11:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  University of Michigan 

message: This article has been hijacked by one side of an ongoing debate, and efforts to balance the discussion keep getting reverted by those persons.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.42.102.128 (talk) 17:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edits were flagged as vandalism. Your efforts to eliminate criticism are interesting. Capitalismojo (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Admissions and Resignation 
Talk:V. O. Key Jr.

message: I do not edit to disparage Key's book; but "great" is cheap praise, which can be easily discounted. Look at the articles on non-notable books on AfD, and see how many of them are called "great" by their fans.  The merits of the volume, even as little as is said here, are more effective and memorable in making the case for it; see WP:Peacock. Septentrionalis 23:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think people ought to read a book before commenting on it. Rjensen 21:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Leaping to conclusions again, I see. If I thought the book worthless, I would have left the implication of crankishness alone.  Septentrionalis 02:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: let's not be coy--have you read the book or not? I read it years ago (all 3 editions) Rjensen 15:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that's two more editions than me; do they vary much? I recall an eminently respectable textbook, in a blue binding; with a fine bloom of anecdotes, including George Washington Plunkitt, a distinct animus against Populists, and a patriotic warning to businessmen not to believe that Fascists would solve their problems: Fascists will indeed take the power of the poor to soak the rich, and the rich to grind the poor; and when they have those powers, they'll use them for themselves. The anecdotage should probably be added to the respective articles, if you have a copy to hand. Septentrionalis 16:40, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Walter Prescott Webb

message: I made many copy edits, cleaned up the citations, and added new text. What remains a problem is the section, "Ideas." It reads to me like an essay, and I don't know what to do about that right now, so I would appreciate some input. 
Oldsanfelipe2 (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Reads like an essay

message: The text of the article reads that Webb was influenced by the Frontier Thesis, while I can site a reliable source which quotes Webb saying that he never read Jackson. This comment should be deleted.
Oldsanfelipe2 (talk) 18:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious tag
Talk:Current asset

message: This page like many others of its ilk in the accounting section are really just definitions of accounting terms and do not constitute -- and will never constitute -- articles. I propose to move all these definitions into a "dictionary" page. I have not decided in my own mind exactly how that should look, but I am convinced that the current configuration of individual paragraphs in not in the spirit of the Wikipedia.gushippo
:I disagree.. while Wikipedia's coverage of accounting-related topics is currently inadequate, concepts such as the classification of assets and liabilities are major topics. I see no reason why this couldn't become a useful article in the future. Rhobite 04:13, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Definitions

message: Is this reference a bit too vague? Shoudn't there be more information to it? Merrick919 (talk) 07:11, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference Number 2

message: hel 41.223.73.254 (talk) 19:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accounts 202108165G
Talk:Joe Jamail

message: I have deleted unsourced information placed by an anonymous user that claims to report grades made by Jamail in certain classes at UT.  If a reputable source is properly referenced, the informaiton can definitely be added back in. Johntex\talk 22:36, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced claims about grades
Talk:Harry Ransom Center

message: There is no mention of the individual, Harry Ransom, in this article. I think there should be  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.6.133.223 (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the article, the Harry Ransom Center possess "a writing journal kept by Jack Kerouac in preparation for writing On the Road".  According to On the Road#Origins, "in the spring of 2008 [the original manuscript] visited the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center".  ie. the Harry Ransom does not at all own the original manuscript - is that what this article is referring to when it refers to the "writing journal" or is it referring to something else? TerraFrost (talk) 21:02, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: A writing journal kept by Jack Kerouac in preparation for writing On the Road
Talk:Mike A. Myers Stadium

message: I'm not surprised the atheletic circuit is considered a fast track as it's 384m in length compared to the normal 400m so you should be able to get round about 4% faster.
I'm guessing there's a flaw in my reasoning, but I don't think I can spot it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.249.209.181 (talk) 13:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I corrected the length of the curved section from 110m to 118m as is given in one of the references cited in the article - it's just a shame the error got into the article as it was reproduced on the Wiki front page :( —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fizzackerly (talk • contribs) 13:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess my eyes were crossed when I put in the 0 in place of the 8.   *Mishatx*-In\Out 16:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fastest Track or Shortest Track 
Talk:Freedom and Revolution

message: I'm not sure that Duncan's change correctly characterizes LR's relationship with the USFI; I am making changes, and I would refer you to the recent International Committee Resolution on Brazil. Rafaelgr 03:53, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for this. As I understand it, the collective is a majority inside F&R, and therefore the current as a whole is generally sympatheric to the positions of the FI. By the way, we really need to rename the USFI page. The fact that there is no-longer a committee called the USec is confusing. --Duncan 07:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Hi there. I was at a meeting yesterday addressed by Stuart Piper, one of the FI militants in Europe who spends the most time with the Brazilian comrades. He explained to me that the FI group inside PSOL is inside Enlace. Enlace is now around 800, and perhaps half of those are with the FI collective. I get the impression that F&R is a current inside Enclace which contains some of the members of the FI collective, but not all. --Duncan 10:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is F&R inside Enlace?
Talk:Frank Erwin Center

message: I think Drum is more common Corpx 06:14, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Drum/Superdrum

message: What are the plans to repurchase or raze it? 2600:1004:B169:FB39:0:50:C09E:F801 (talk) 17:34, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future?
Talk:Sydney Kings

message: Is there any evidence that the Kinds recieved special salary cap provisions? Tmothyh 03:55, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't find anything about the cap break, only about how they did manage to stay under back in 2003 . RandomEcho 04:27, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No evidence means it should go it is clearly POVTmothyh 04:44, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: seems like this page has been vandalized, perhaps a rollback should be made? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.166.22.162 (talk • contribs) 03:47, 23 November 2006  (UTC)
:Took care of it, thank you. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 03:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism?
Talk:John Mackovic

message: When I came upon the article in October 2006 (version at the time), I thought it need serious expansion.  I reviewed the article today (version here) and its been expanded but in a way that omits Mackovic's very public problems that led to his termination at Texas and Arizona.  --Bobak 23:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article has become a Mackovic advertisment

message: Hey Coach! This is John Johnson. It’s been awhile since we’ve talked, but I would love to catch up. Hope all is well with you your family. Take care, and hope to hear from you. 2601:280:C280:7A30:B1D8:C77D:941A:E72C (talk) 08:47, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello!!!
Talk:Roy Williams (wide receiver)

message: In early life: "Roy claims that teasing only made him practice harder to prove himself to his peers."
No mention of what he was teased about, and the claim is unsourced.  Seems like a leftover from something larger that was edited out?  Removing per policy on living people Bios.
The Storage Wars part of this article is wrong. It was actually the other Roy Williams that played for OU who was on Storage Wars Texas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.174.90.84 (talk) 04:37, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Win a Date with Tad Hamilton!

message: Is there any connection between the title character and the city, which was once famous for having added an exclamation point to its name?
174.101.198.62 (talk) 01:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tad Hamilton! and Hamilton!, OH 
Talk:Full Circle (Stargate SG-1)

message: Hold on... in the version I just watched, it didn't end with SG1 dissapearing and ending back at the SGC - they instead walked off into the distance towards a lone stargate on the hill (no longer in the Pyramid).
Is there a different version of this episode out, or did some one flat out make that last line up?
--Markavian 04:00, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No your version is the only one. Change it.-- Alfakim --  talk  13:48, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled