lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Louis Phélypeaux, Marquis of Phélypeaux

message: It is my understanding that Louis' father was also called Louis Phélypeaux, so should this page be Louis Phélpeaux II? Medievalist Frenchie (talk) 14:04, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering the issues around Upper Alsace, I'll ask you @Srnec if you want to move it or not. Medievalist Frenchie (talk) 14:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
----
:Louis Phélypeaux, comte de Pontchartrain →  – It is my understanding that Louis' father was also called Louis Phélypeaux de Pontchartrain, so should this page be Louis Phélpeaux II de Pontchartrain?. Medievalist Frenchie (talk) 15:50, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  He is the primary topic for this article title, and should not be changed.  I would disambiguate his lesser-known father with some other official title or even birthdate, and leave this article be.  Check the literature.  I've run into the same problem here with Medici family members, where Wiki-editors were making up numerals for all the multitude of Lorenzos, Giulianos, Pieros, etc. whereas the secondary literature actually has standard ways of referring to them that were sufficient disambiguation. Walrasiad (talk) 04:17, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You can certainly find Louis II Phélypeaux de Pontchartrain in English RS. Nobody is "making up" this numeral. Srnec (talk) 01:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 September 2022 

message: The dates for the terms of office given in the infobox do not align with the "Biography" section. Can someone verify which dates are correct? Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:Capital Offence

message: I can see the reason for suggesting a merge - but my opinion is there is a big difference between 'offences' and the actual 'punishments'.  This article is also specific to English law which was assimilated by many other nations later on, and in different forms.
ROBDAV69
I'm going to change this to a redirect page. The Capital punishment article says Capital punishment, also known as the death penalty, is the execution of a convicted criminal by the state as punishment for crimes known as capital crimes or capital offences, which is pretty much the same as covered here. This article almost reads like a dictionary entry. The American spelling for Capital offense already redirects to the CP page. -- DSGruss 01:33, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Any Legal Thinkers Welcome
Talk:Étienne François de Choiseul, Duke of Choiseul

message: How much of a French-speaking province was Lorraine at the beginning of the 18th century?  
*Lorrain language
*Lorraine Franconian
*West Central German
*High German languages
*Moselle Franconian
*http://www.lexilogos.com/lorrain_langue_dictionnaires.htm
*http://74.125.93.132/search?q=cache:dKH5lgoku5YJ:www.corpusdelaparole.culture.fr/spip.php%3Farticle37+langue+parl%C3%A9e+en+Lorraine+du+temps+au+XVIIIe+si%C3%A8cle,+fran%C3%A7ais+ou+allemand+%3F&cd=8&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=firefox-a
--Frania W. (talk) 20:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: French language in Lorraine

message: Surely the French would have referred to it as the latter.
Ganpati23 (talk) 07:01, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is it called San Domingo, not Saint Domingue  or Saint-Domingue?
Talk:Mícheál Ó Cléirigh

message: There is no contemporary record of Ó Cléirigh under the former name of this article. Anglicising just for the sake of it is insulting us all. Ó Cléirigh is almost invariably known by his Irish name in English, and that distinguishes him. For the most high profile example of this today see the Mícheál Ó Cléirigh Institute in UCD: http://www.ucd.ie/mocleirigh/rebrandtest.htm  El Gringo 23:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mícheál Ó Cléirigh

message: Why does this link redirect here? Finn Rindahl (talk) 17:40, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably because he worked on compiling it, but this could certainly be a bit clearer. ANB (talk) 03:30, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Martyrology of Donegal]]
Talk:Jules Bastide

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 11:30, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: We might want to do a section on this man in literature if he is the man mentioned several times in Victor Hugo's "The history of a crime" (see http://books.google.com/books?id=FKsTAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA583&lpg=PA583&dq=Bastide+crime&source=bl&ots=0Z_Rz5eJaR&sig=p1GNAKXQvc91HiXuvhe2Zlwzl5o&hl=en&sa=X&ei=WNMqVJWRPI-cyASj7ICYCQ&ved=0CDcQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=Bastide&f=false) which add up to quite a vivid portrait. 
Poihths (talk) 16:08, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  For what it's worth
Talk:Albert Sarraut

message: Murder is a loaded term.  When police kill someone for breaking the laws, it is not considered murder. The Milice had legitimate jurisdiction from the government of France at the time. Albert Sarraut had broken the laws of Vichy France (Regardless if those laws were tyrannical and fascist and unfair) he broke them and was thus killed. 192.104.181.227 (talk) 14:42, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased wording
Talk:Edinburgh Crystal

message: I moved this page in accordance with WP:MOS, but I accidentally pressed enter before I could add a comment to the reason for move box! --Mal 05:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: This important edit was made "Its name was subsequently bought by Waterford Crystal who continue to market products under the brand name, mostly manufactured overseas. But this is now little more than a label, and the company with its unique manufacturing skills and traditions no longer exists."
However, I have not been able to source it - can anyone provide a source, please? TerriersFan (talk) 00:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The takeover is now sourced but the manufacturing being overseas still needs sourcing. TerriersFan (talk) 04:35, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Takeover
Talk:Véhicule Blindé Léger

message: I've removed the "Fiction" section tht pointed out the VBL is used by a side in a video game.  That may be an important fact about the video game, but is not an important fact about the VBL. Good Skoda (talk) 21:54, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And you did well. Rama (talk) 08:50, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiction section 
Talk:List of acts of the Parliament of Australia

message: There's a lot of 2005 stuff I think should be added.  Work Choices, Sale of Telstra, Anti Terror and AT No 2, just for a start.  Thoughts on others that need talking about? --mjec
:Feel free to add any legislation you think is important. This is far from a complete list. Note that some of the legislation though (sale of Telstra being one) is probably better discussed in the Telstra article, and isn't necessarily notable as a piece of legislation as such. :) Rebecca 09:42, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More Legislation

message: There was a Defence Act in 1909 that virually introduced boy conscription. In a bid to provide defence for Australia the federal parliament introduced the above Act to provide Australia with a citizen army. Boys and young men of European descent between the ages of 12 and 26 had to participate in periodical military training. The conscripts were divided in to ages groups: 12- 14 year olds had to complete 90 hours of military training drills and other military activies in the Junior Cadets, 14-18 year olds had to register for Senior Cadets and participate in 64 hours of drills and the like while 18-26 year olds had to train in the citizen militia. Tis Act came in place on 1st of January 1911 and excluded boys and men  you were not of Eurpean heritage, including Aborigines and males of Asian Heritage. Ruthfeatonby 02:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defence Act 

message: There doesn't appear to be a similar list of state legislation for the Australian states.  Would this be appropriate?  Is anyone working on this?  Just assuming that whoever watches this page may also be interested in this...  Bernard S. Jansen 04:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd have no objection to someone doing this. I'm not sure it would fit on this page, but if you could come up with a suitable title, you're welcome to create it. However, did you have any specific pieces of legislation in mind for such a list? Rebecca 09:07, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For starters, I was thinking of writing an article on the Queensland Coal Mining Health & Safety Act and Regulations.  Not sure if there are other articles to form a list of.  Bernard S. Jansen 11:28, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Legislation 

message: This is an incredibly incomplete and extremely selective list.  What is its purpose?  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 00:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose
Talk:Principality of Serbia (early medieval)

message: Stari Ras was not part of Serbia in the 9th and 10th centuries. Maps you use are crap. Make better maps.--93.137.169.147 (talk) 18:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @93.137.169.147 Under dominion of Bulgarian rulers, not controled by Bulgars. Bulgars were minority in the empire Pixius  talk 23:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stari Ras
Talk:Family Law Act 1975

message: I'll come back and do more on this later. --mjec 23:21, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

message: This article seriously needs references for it to be taken seriously. I'll try to add some myself but it definitely needs to be done before this article can be used as a credible source of information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LostOverThere (talk • contribs) 02:46, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: There should be mention somewhere of the practices before this Act was introduced.  Either a brief mention here, or link to content elsewhere.  
—DIV (115.64.145.215 (talk) 12:28, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prior history
Talk:CJBR-DT

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support as nom. — stickguy (:^›)— home - talk - 23:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Alsos Mission/Archive 1

message: we had this page and ALSOS. I merged this to that. Someone, delete this one and make redirect; I dn't know how yet 64.168.30.87 05:27, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk 

message: used to say  "many top scientists at Los Alamos" were spies, I changed it to "one". Any better references? 67.124.100.2 20:54, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: many spies at Los Alamos?

message: THere is this page and ALSO Operation Alsos.
I am merging them to here. Then if somebody knows how to delete the old one and create a redirect... it would be great. 64.168.30.87 05:11, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: duplicate page -- how to move/redirect?

message: Stalins "extensive spy network" is KGB.stop introducing emphemisms. 
:Well... Actually, the Soviets has an extensive KGB network (though the acronym was NKVD then, I think), and an extensive GRU network, and an extensive Communist Party USA network, all operating in parallel. So the phrase is a considerable saving on words... ww 05:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: extensive spy network?

message: I see that my edit to add the theory that Heisenberg deliberately failed to develop an atomic bomb has been removed from the article.  I only put it in there because without it, the last paragraph makes no sense.  As it stands, the article tells readers that Goudsmit denied Heisenberg's claims, but doesn't say that Heisenberg made them, or indeed what they were.  If the claims are too controversial for this article, surely their refuting is as well?
For now, I will try the alternate approach of reworking the end of the article to not refute claims not made.   Please consider this before reverting that too.  Gnfnrf 17:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heisenberg 

message: Is the name ALSOS really incorrectly written in US Army documents?  I don't know what the style was then, but these days some documents for internal consumption will write out operational names, objectives, and other operational terms in all caps (i.e., ENDURING FREEDOM, OBJ DOG, PL WHITE [phase line]) --CatCube 75.199.156.64 (talk) 14:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrectly Written?
Talk:Stephen Sykes

message: I feel something ois wrong about the history.  I was an undergraduate at SJC from 1964-1967, and Keith was Dean of Chapel when I went up before his ordination.  It was a cause celebre at the time.
btw he was a great guy in college -- supportive of students and all rounf a good thing.
Jpff (talk) 20:33, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dean of St Johns
Talk:Operation Backfire (World War II)

message: Information has recently emerged that British interceptors working for MI6 monitored radio beacon signals from V2 launches by the Russians from Peenemunde in late 1945. Although "Peenemunde" and "Russians" were specifically mentioned, perhaps it was down to misinterpretation of the Operation Backfire tests. British government records of wireless interception for this date have not been released but if there is any supporting evidence this information should be added to the Operation Backfire page. Source - personal communication from interceptor.Stan Ames (talk) 17:20, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian V2 tests at Peenemunde in 1945? 

message: Should this:  be added to this page? Mztourist (talk) 04:28, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Megaroc 

message: The articel mentions that the last shot was named "Operation Clitterhouse". I have some doubt because it is mentioned nowhere else. I could not find even find it in the official Backfire report. It is mentioned in some other documents in the internet but might be copied from this Wikipedia article SchmiAlf (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clitterhouse
Talk:Dexippus

message: Why considered Latin author? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Connection (talk • contribs) 23:34, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Perhaps useful  . Also available on other sites including Academia.  Empire in Crisis: Gothic Invasions and Roman Historiography. --Andrew Lancaster (talk) 12:47, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful source no open access
Category talk:Films about religion

message: This category would satisfy what the Da Vinci code is: not a Christian film, but a film about relgion. This category would also include every film in which religion is a major player.--Drboisclair 01:00, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you on that, also "The Last Temptation of Christ" would suitably go here. Problem is the title is a horrible piece of English, the proper phrase should be "Religious films" or "Films on the subject of Religion". :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 09:14, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree should be titled "Religious films". I will request. nirvana2013 (talk) 20:03, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For the reasons I mentioned above I don't think so. These deserve a more considered debate, not a speedy rename. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: To rename this "Religious films" would not allow the The DaVinci Code to be categorized because "religious" implies that the film would be espousing religion rather than a film that deals with religion objectively without praise or blame. That would be the case with The DaVinci Code, which had been categorized as a Christian film, which it certainly is not. It should remain "religion films" because that is a more succinct title than something like "films which concern religion." Leave well enough alone if possible.--drb (talk) 13:36, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  starting from 2006
Talk:List of possible monopolies

message: Please add more monopolies, I don't know them all Scifiintel 23:36, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I note you took off my nonsense category. I will add it again, unless you can find sources for each entry on the list. At the moment it is no more than a bunch of opinions and Wiki is not the place for opinions. In the meanwhile I will add unreferenced.--Richhoncho 23:42, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for adding the references. What still puts me off is the word "possible" which is not encyclopedic in nature, perhaps companies accused of being monopolies and/or companies found to be operating a monopoly, or something similar would be a better title.--Richhoncho 00:17, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/2006 FIFA World Cup - Group A

message: You can't count. There were 2 decents. Kingjeff 23:40, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're just the nominator, TheProject went neutral, and 63.93.197.67's vote is really to merge at worst. But if you'll sleep better thinking that this was some kind of close call, fine. There were two dissents. Happy? Now please find something else to devote your attention to. Melchoir 23:48, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there was User:Muhaidib as well.  He seemed decent enough. Although I didn't agree with his dissent.   SLUMGUM  yap  stalk  02:59, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be the "Muhaidib's lone dissent" I mentioned. Melchoir 03:02, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Naco (slang)

message: Simply put, this article is a bit of a mess.  The information seems to just be randomnly stuffed everywhere and anywhere without any kind of organization (the wikipedia equivalent of someone's attic).  I can try to repair this article soon, but it would probably be best to first hear how others would like to organize it.  Maybe an etymology, history, and popular culture section?  --Merkurix 04:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up

message: Hi, I've readded the section about how Naco is perjorative especially in reference to indigenous people, since I've heard it used this way and the Academia Mexicana de la Lengua  also defines naco as: 
naco (Posiblemente de totonaco.), naca. adj., y m. y f. 1. Indio, indígena. || 2. De bajo nivel cultural, ignorante. -Solid Reign (talk) 20:15, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the reference to this, it's an essay by Carlos Monsivais. -Solid Reign (talk) 01:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naco in reference to indigenous people 

message: I think current uses of naco have more to do with bad taste than with social o racial characteristics. In fact, my impression is that using naco as a derogatory term on racial grounds would be frowned upon by most people. Naco has to do with bad taste, poor manners (not in how you handle cutlery, rather related with been rude or un-courteous). A naco may very well be a rich (even old-money rich, people - to address a common theme in the article) who act with no respect to others: reckless driving, cutting you off, answering a mobile during a movie, etc.  Agurza (talk) 18:34, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beg to differ
Talk:Sitges

message: If you look at this link:
http://encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Sitges
you will notice that the last paragraph is the exact opposite of what is presented directly on the Wikipedia site for Sitges.  Which is correct? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.90.164.0 (talk) 05:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy between Wiki entries linked from other sites 

message: I'm surprised there's no mention of it being a top international destination for gay travellers and it having a big gay population. Gay tourism is a key factor in the local economy.Gymnophoria (talk) 15:44, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think that this is rather a strange omission. Would anyone care to add something about this, and about the historical reasons for this?Jimjamjak (talk) 10:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It used to be there. Probably unilaterally deleted. Needs to be restored. Chienlit (talk) 15:48, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reverted the previous deletion by a url.  but added a caveat that it needs sourcing. Will somebuddy please add a ref. Chienlit (talk) 15:56, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gay destination 

message: I would like to point at the fact that Sitges does not, in any way, mean "silos".
The fact is that the name of the village comes from medieval Latin, appearing for the first time as 'Cigis'. Thus, the etimology of the name of the village has nothing to do with "silos". I removed the false etimology from the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.231.173.72 (talk) 15:42, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sitges does not mean "silos" 

message: Sitges also hosts a fairly notable chess tournament, the Sunway Sitges International Chess Festival, which should probably be included in the article --jonas (talk) 05:25, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chess tournament
Talk:Neubrandenburg

message: HMm. There should be something about it's role in the Thirty Years' War here, I think... I'll get to the library and get me some books later. Jobjörn (Talk | contribs) 23:57, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Worbey & Farrell

message: this is also a German word, a comic ([Katzenjammer Kids] and a song by [Kyuss]. Disambiguation? Ruben 23:58, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I suggest this article is renamed "Katzenjammer (comical duo)" to allow for a dismbiguation page pointing to it and "Katzenjammer (band)" (the Norwegian band).  I don't think either is more notable than the other to earn a redirect from "Katzenjammer". Kjetilho (talk) 15:38, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming and disambiguation
Talk:Abba-Zaba

message: There's a song called "Abba Zabba" by Fenix TX, but from the lyrics I can't say for sure if it's really about the candy bar or not.
I found another song titled "Abba Zaba" by Captain Beefheart that actually mentions the candy, but the lyrics are pretty nonsensical.  http://www.hotlyrics.net/lyrics/C/Captain_Beefheart/Abba_Zabba.html
Quixoto 22:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since the article mentions 1922, I'd go with that. THX1136 (talk) 21:31, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Abba-Zabba song