lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Banco Ambrosiano

message: I have changed one sentence in the introductory paragraph, which mentions the murder of Pope John Paul I as historical fact instead of speculative conspiracy theory.  The sentence previously read "and the 1978 murder of John Paul I has been alleged to be linked to the Ambrosiano scandal."
ber06122, February 7, 2006, 2:31 p.m. EST.
:This should not even be part of the article's lead. Intangible2.0 16:05, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This piece is a loose and random collection of poorly worded facts and much speculation. There is an absence of narrative flow. An individual seeking to understand the scandal would not gain much information from this article, which needs a complete rewrite.--71.36.99.75 (talk) 05:49, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an "article" 
Talk:The Mansion of Happiness

message: Interesting. Is this based in any way on Snakes and Ladders, which was originally designed in India to teach morality and good behaviour (landing on a "good" square led to a ladder, while "bad" behaviour led to a snake)? Tonywalton  | Talk 19:45, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question but have found nothing in connection with Snakes and Ladders.  Both games are based on moral behavior; however, MoH appears to have a specifically Christian coloring. ItsLassieTime (talk) 19:11, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Snakes and Ladders?

message: I rated this article "high" on the importance scale because it's supposed to be the first commercially produced game in the US.  As such (if true, of course) this would make it quite notable.  --Craw-daddy | T | 17:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating

message: Hello again. Before you nominate the article for Good Article status again, I recommend you take another look at the analysis section. It seems to promote Christian values while degrading Capitalism. Probably unintentional, but you might want to have another look at it nonetheless. \ / (⁂) 10:06, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Analysis section POV

message: Thanks to all who have contributed their time and talents with this article! Top-knotch evaluations only refine an article and bring it closer to GA. I've slightly rewritten the Analysis section and await comments here before renominating for GA status. Thank you! ItsLassieTime (talk) 19:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Renomination

message: It's strange this article does not mention the Game of the Goose. The Mansion of Happiness is simply a re-themed version of the goose game, of which there are countless examples. There's nothing unique about Mansion in terms of game design.--Countakeshi (talk) 20:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game of the Goose
Talk:BallenIsles

message: This page looks too much like promotional material for the development. It has recently been heavily edited by User:Edmcmenamy, a single-pupose account, which implies a conflict of interest. I believe it would be inappropriate for Edmcmenamy to remove the improvement tags I have placed at the top of the article. -- Donald Albury 17:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Edmcmenamy has signed as "Ed McMenamy, BallenIsles Communications Committee". PrimeHunter (talk) 18:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Condition of this article

message: Does this article imply that separate articles should be written for each gated community, housing development and housing project in the United States?Stevenmitchell (talk) 01:18, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to prod it a while back. I'm not sure why I didn't take it to AfD after that. It does have its defenders. -- Donald Albury 08:21, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Simply Amazing - An actual article on a housing development for the wealthy
Talk:List of time offsets by U.S. state and territory

message: Didn't some additional counties in Indiana move to Central Time in the wake of the state's decision to use DST statewide? --Jfruh 19:53, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indiana? 

message: Wouldn't the article's title lend itself to listing the states by time zone? Currently, it's just a list of states with their time zones. This should be the other way--a list of the time zones with the their states—or simply the current list in addition to the new list. Ideas? I'll attempt to compile it if there's agreement. Or the article could possibly be retitled to something like "List of U.S. time zones by state" (not serious about that, would sort of be pointless). //MrD9 06:49, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List... "by time zone" 

message: I don't want to make a big deal of it, but I preferred it when the DST column said "DST" and "No" instead of "Yes" and "No".  In long tables like these, you can't always see the table header and so it is really helpful to someone looking at the middle of the table to be able to understand the meaning of each column from its immediate context. YBG (talk) 05:25, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes/No or DST/No 

message: In the map of Kansas, it is difficult to see the four MST counties, because their purple color is very similar to the red color of the rest of Kansas. The US map (at top of page) has CST in yellow. Would someone be able to change the Kansas red to yellow? Eagle4000 (talk) 02:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I think all of the county maps should follow the same color scheme as the map in the lede. YBG (talk) 02:10, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kansas colors
Talk:The Devil (tarot card)

message: Done.  If more help is needed, contact the Guilde or my talk page.  Levalley (talk) 18:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyediting

message: Of these Tarot card articles, this one is perhaps the one needing most work.  I agree with what everyone else said above, about this being largely unsourced.  I don't think that most of this is original research or opinion, as I've read it all elsewhere.  It meanders over a variety of sources, including Jung (who wrote on Tarot) and the Jungian Tarot book (whose author I don't remember), as well as taking wholesale interpretations out of the booklets accompanying several tarot decks (all of which are copyrighted to U.S. Games systems), and then, some other systems as well.  The article focuses mostly on Ryder-Waite and should so state, as so many other Tarot decks use different iconography.  I put in a few fact tags where this problem is most apparent (borrowing from others' writings or making claims that would be opinion if in fact the editor hadn't read them elsewhere).  I'm going to try and find a more appropriate tag for this - copyediting is done, it needs citations.Levalley (talk) 18:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: General Comments

message: I looked up some possible historical information that can be added to the page. The sources are cited below in case anyone would like to go over the sources and add anything.
Dummett, M. (1993). The history of card games. European Review, 1(2), 125-135. doi:10.1017/S1062798700000478
This is a research article published by Cambridge University Press, so it should be a reliable source. The article covers historical designs of cards used in card games, and the influences of other cultures on card games.
Farley, Helen (2009). A Cultural History of Tarot. 175 Fifth Avenue, New York NY 10010: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd. ISBN 978 1 84885 053 8. 
This is a book created by an author who research's religion and was published by a reliable company. The book covers the history of Tarot, information on all major arcana cards, and cultural influences on Tarot.
Sullivan, Anne; Eladhari, Mirjam Palosaari; Cook, Michael (2018-08-07). "Tarot-based narrative generation". Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. FDG '18. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery: 1–7. doi:10.1145/3235765.3235819. ISBN 978-1-4503-6571-0.
This is a research article published by Association for Computing Machinery, so it should be a reliable source. The article covers meanings of certain Tarot cards and some history of Tarot, but mainly discusses how they used Tarot cards to create their online game.
Nchloe (talk) 01:10, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible information to be added
Talk:Kutubiyya Mosque

message: I removed this statement It was built on top of the ruins of the Almoravids emperial palace..
From what i read the koutobia mosque was built by the almoravids, but the building was not sofisticated enough, and therefore, the almohads rebuilt it. Please forgive me, if i'm wrong.Read3r 10:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The mosque is made of red stone, formerly plastered, and has six rooms in succession, one above the other. It was designed so as to prevent anyone gazing in from the minaret to the harems of the king." -- from the article
I don't understand how six rooms one above the other prevents spying on the harem.  It seems to imply that the harem was kept inside the mosque.  Surely that is not right.  But if the harem was in an adjacent building, how does the design prevent spying?  Some clarification is needed here.  The sentence could also be better written, viz., "It was so designed to make it impossible to see the harems of the king from the minaret." or something like that. I have not changed it because I'm not sure what it means!   Other sentences in the article could be improved by rewording, too.  72.179.53.2 (talk) 12:48, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architecture 

message: A painting by Winston Churchill Tower of the Koutoubia Mosque — a gift from Churchill to US President Franklin D. Roosevelt — is being sold by Angelina Jolie next month with an estimated price of 1.5 million pounds to 2.5 million pounds  https://www.arabnews.com/node/1801946/art-culture
Peter K Burian (talk) 20:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That is indeed so, except it went for rather more than the estimate! Given that the picture's importance, as the only one Churchill painted during the Second World War, I wonder if it should be mentioned in the article? KJP1 (talk) 12:47, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be mentioned quickly in the later history section, which hasn't got much in it yet. R Prazeres (talk) 23:33, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Painting of the Mosque by Winston Churchill
Talk:Ceredig

message: *Caratacus (Caradog) was someone else.
*Gododdin wasn't Pictish.
*Ceredig wasn't given all of Cunedda's conquests, just the southern parts.
Gareth 20:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: For added funny, Gododdin gave us Lothian, it was ostensibly not north of the Antonine Wall. Snapdragonfly (talk) 16:11, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting details
Talk:List of bishops of the United Methodist Church

message: The TITLE of this article should really be "List of United Methodist Bishops."  While all of these Bishops are/were Bishops in what is now the United Methodist Church, NOT all of them were Bishops in what WAS the Methodist Church:  Some were Bishops in what was the EUB Church, the Evangelical Church, the United Brethren Church, etc.  Will someone tell me how to change this (or do it him/herself) please?  Thank you! Pastorwayne 20:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The proposed renaming is not really all that much more accurate, because e.g. EUB bishops were also not United Methodist Bishops.  The list really needs to be split so that Bishops are listed according to the name of the denomination in which they actually served as Bishop, regardless of whether that denomination was subsquently merged or renamed.  Otherwise, Bishops end up being restrospectively relabelled, which may not reflect the nature of their work ... and it appears possible that some Bishops may not have joined the merged churches: e.g. did any Bishops resist the 1939 merger and join the Southern Methodist Church instead? BrownHairedGirl 12:17, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the bishops listed in the UM Book of Discipline are considered UM bishops.  Bishops who were members of antecedent bodies (ME Church, EUB, etc.) are considered UM bishops.  I would favor their inclusion.  Now, if we wanted to do so, we could go through and denote each one as "MEC" or "UB" or whatever.  KHM03 (talk) 12:55, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

text: That's fine; my point was that these were all United Methodist bishops, officially speaking.  KHM03 (talk) 13:20, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm persuaded too!  BrownHairedGirl 14:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: split tag removed in light of this discussion. BrownHairedGirl 16:38, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

text: This list would be much more useful (and less 'clouded') if it did state which of the predecessor denominations appointed which bishop. There's plenty of room in a list to put more information. -- roundhouse 11:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming?
Talk:Be-Bop Deluxe

message: I simplified the discography section by separating studio albums from live albums.  I also removed track listings from the collections (best ofs) since there are more collections and retrospectives than studio albums from the group.  A link to the discography page at Permanent Flame should suffice for anyone interested in further details (in fact I'm not sure we need full track listings from any of the albums).  Ahkond 20:04, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I simplified

message: If you research, you will see that *four* of their five original studio albums are credited to Be-Bop Deluxe, not Be Bop Deluxe
* Axe Victim (1974)
* Futurama (1975)
* Sunburst Finish (1976)
* Modern Music (1977) (as Be Bop Deluxe)
* Drastic Plastic (1978)
see here for example: http://www.discogs.com/viewimages?release=540655
(E-Kartoffel (talk) 22:30, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The band name: Be-Bop Deluxe

message: I took the following off the intro section: (albeit often hidden beneath Nelson's quirky lyrical and musical metaphors). While perhaps an accurate assessment, it is also editorializing as there's no cited source for the opinion. Weeb Dingle (talk) 19:25, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  trimmings 

message: Don't know which it is, don't really care. But the article looks half-assed if the title of the damn thing doesn't match the text. I reverted back so it matches, and suggest that there be a consensus reached before changing basic elements of the article like the subject's name. PaulCHebert (talk) 07:03, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Be-Bop or Be Bop? 

message: This section contains a lot of unreferenced statements. Look, I like the band, you like the band, but making up your own opinions on albums and group direction is a huge no-no.  Blogs - unless coming directly from a band member - are NOT Reliable Sources.  Let's get this article cleaned up, folks. That probably means deleting a lot of stuff from this section.50.111.35.97 (talk) 12:41, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Research
Talk:Viridian

message: Windows 98's default desktop color IS teal. Windows 2000 (and Millennium) both used a blue desktop. It is possible that Win95 did use viridian as its default desktop color, but Win98 (both the original and second editions) definitely used teal in the desktop. However, I'm reluctant to edit the article until I verify Win95's desktop color.--201.243.52.105 20:06, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The screenshot of Windows 95 on its Wikipedia article show a teal desktop, also. I'm gonna go ahead ande dit this one.--201.243.52.105 20:10, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The article states that the HSV is (113°, 87%, 97%), but according to Mac OS X the real values are (161º, 51%, 51%). The values as stated in the article seem to give me Bright Green (#66FF00). Can anyone confirm either set of values? Mac OS X 23:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HSV 

message: It seems that there is more green than blue in Viridian, as well as it comes from the Latin word for green.  Shouldn't it be classified under the shades of green, rather than the shades of cyan?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.18.46.231 (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A shade of blue? 

message: None of the trivia is relevant or interesting. It should all be cut. I'm not willing to do this because it's not really my page. At best the trivia could be part of a disambiguation page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.212.64.234 (talk) 21:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its use as a variation of "green" (in the sense of "eco-friendly") is probably worth noting, but I agree on the rest. 69.177.111.0 (talk) 20:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: This page has been defaced, and needs to be repaired. Won't let me do it atm for some reason! F0088 (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Problem was the page was cached with the bad version of the template. Editing the page as you did, or forcing a  should fix the problem. PaleAqua (talk) 02:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graffiti 

message: Does Veridian Dynamics (pronounced the same, but spelled slightly differently) fit under the Television section? -- Categorically Not (🗪) 05:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Veridian Dynamics? 

message: — Assignment last updated by SophieKommers (talk) 16:16, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: A History of Color
Talk:San Pedro Underwater Archaeological Preserve State Park

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* The Florida Bureau of Archaeological Research Coordinates for this site are 
24° 51’ 48” N, 80° 40’ 46” W
Bureau Underwater (talk) 18:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:Smartbomb (book)

message: I feel that Smartbomb should lead to Precision-guided munition and not this book. I daresay that most people think of a bomb rather than a book when they hear the word "smartbomb". --Jambalaya 20:18, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I does so by drawing attention to the armament ("This article is about..."). --RememberMe 17:02, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:61st World Science Fiction Convention

message: work in progress Avt tor 20:19, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Progress
Talk:Prooftext

message: POV? Tone? It just doesn't jive well with me, perhaps an "expert" can clean it up. Ifnord 20:26, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  an old comment 

message: Holding out the use of the Bible by Protestants as the primary example of the fallacy of prooftexting is certainly biased.  In the Bible reference cited, there is no analysis of how the conclusion is made that the example is taken out of context or why the use of it by Protestants to differentiate their beliefs and practices from those of the Catholic church is invalid. 
Rather than start another chapter of the endless doctrinal war between Protestants and Catholics, there should be a less slanted presentation of the topic without the one-sided bias showing how Protestants do this with no equivilent example of how Catholics may do the same thing (such as building the case for Peter being the first pope from a single verse in Matthew, for example.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.157.46.122 (talk) 13:58, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers! I think it's interesting this way, not particularly onerous. Papeschr 10:23, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article strikes me as quite slanted and biased 

message: Where exactly does this wording, "salvation by faith alone, apart from good works", come from? As far as I've ever seen only Catholics ever formulate the "protestant" position like that, whereas Protestants says "salvation is by faith, not works". I'm very suspicious of this, honestly. But I could just not know of something, too.tooMuchData 20:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: ?

message: Maybe a little (but not all) of the controversy, above, would go away if we can distinguish between prooftexting, and taking data from the writings of hostile witnesses. I see both things happening all the time in areas involving the passions: Science, religion, politics - even romance. Words quoted out of context; Partial quotes; Twisting of meaning. Prooftexting appears to be part of all that. But if I can catch my opponent documenting something verifiably true to my advantage, I don't think that is prooftexting, even if my opponent is hopping mad about it. Mbanak (talk) 13:34, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prooftexting would not apply to lifting the writings of hostile witnesses 

message: I daringly added The term has currency primarily in theological and exegetical circles. 
Is this true and can it be sourced? Should it be instead The term originated in theological and exegetical circles ?
I am assuming the term is used by some religious people as a tool of critique against others, so I'm not taking sides by this statement.
Of course it is used by others outside these circles, but I wanted some "context" ;-).
178.38.111.13 (talk) 09:28, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context of phrase
Talk:Pauline Jewett

message: Note that Jewett did not "cross the floor" since she changed her party loyalty while out of office -- she was a Liberal MP, then was defeated, then switched to the NDP, and was elected again later. --Saforrest 20:27, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tuskegee Airmen National Historic Site

message: re. revision 1142671881, a revert of my old edit: the sentence i edited has no linked citation, the term "experiment" is used throughout the article for the program, and the term "experience" (from some mild googling) seems to be a true alternate name for it (in which case it would make sense to be consistent with the rest of the article, and add a note + citation?) anna328p // talk 23:30, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent revert
Talk:Catabolisis

message: Actually, I'd think this belongs more with starvation than with catabolism.  Granted, both words share an etymology, but I think this is more about starvation. Csari 20:35, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the proposed merge with [[catabolism]]

message: So is the correct spelling catabolisis or catabolysis?  I find both in regular google, but only catabolysis in google scholar, which makes me suspect the article is at best the less-common form, and at worst, a mis-spelling.  On Pubmed, only one hit for catabolysis, none for -isis.  Which makes me start to wonder if this is really a well-established word, as opposed to dietary neologism? Csari 20:35, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling? 

message: Indeed, spelling was an issue here. This article didn't add anything to starvation nor to anabolism, so I've merged. But I think catabolism should indeed be split up from anabolism in the future.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 13:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:Valéry Grancher

message: As of June 29 2007, the article says:
"He was the first artist to sell an Internet art piece to a contemporary art museum, The Cartier Foundation for Contemporary Art, in Paris in 1998."
This claim isn't supported by any secondary litterature i'm aware of. For example, according to "New Media Art", by Mark Tribe/Reena Jana, Taschen, Bonn, 2006, , the first piece of online art sold to a museum (the Whitney Museum of American Art) is "The World's First Collaborative Sentence" by Douglas Davis, in 1995. As long as this isn't proven wrong, the mentioned claim should be removed from this page. 1904.CC 22:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate claim ? 

message: * Article is not Neutral-POV, several sentences in opening paragraphs.
* Lists use BR html tags instead of Wiki syntax for lists.
* Article needs general language/wording/spelling/grammar cleanup.
* Some internal html links need converting into references, some already have been.
— Wackymacs 20:38, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV and Cleanup rationales 