lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:UltraCorps

message: There ought to be a note that all movement is strictly world to world with no calling back of dispatched fleets and the number of turns taken for any journey is simply the number of units to the target world divided by the speed of the fleet.
The only interception system are scanners which only see fleets moving directly towards or away from the world where the scanner is located and it is up to the players to respond by moving fleets or changing production orders when they see an inbound hostile fleet.
There is also no game support for allies.  Sending a combat fleet to another player's system always results in combat to the death and sending a gift fleet gives it to the current owner of the world, which might have changed while the gift fleet was enroute.
Hcobb (talk) 18:02, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movement
Talk:MissionForce: CyberStorm

message: How about at least mentioning a change like that on the talk page? Just a thought...Threedots dead (talk) 23:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey SPACEKNIGHT 

message: I could have sworn this was a Classic Battletech rules engine game  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:46:281:3DC0:C0B9:1048:163E:EA68 (talk) 06:48, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  MechWarrior
Talk:American Conquest

message: The article says "Players can experience battles entirely new to the RTS Genre, from the Battle of Alamo to Battle of Gettysburg." in the paragraph about Divided Nation (which unlike the main game and its first addon wasn't developed by GSC Gameworld but Revolution of Strategy, what should be noted). There actually was an entire RTS game titled "Sid Meier's Gettysburg!" from 1997 so this statement simply sounds like some false advertisement. --178.42.68.109 (talk) 13:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divided Nation
Talk:Stronghold 2

message: This article is definitely not of neutral point of view. PC Gamer in the UK gave Stronghold 2 a good review, and many found he game to be good. I don't what the author of this article is on about. True there are many bugs. However, since no one really cares about this article, I don't think it would be worth asking someone to cite references here. Here, is where references are needed. Tourskin 23:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong! 

message: Does this article really need to go through all the characters in the game and all the units, what they cost etc?  It seems like the article is way to sprawling, consists of lists and is just generally poorly written.  68.145.199.164 (talk) 19:13, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not Gamefaqs. If people want a guide to the game they can go there, but Wikipedia is not a game guide site. I agree, the article needs major clean-up Zell65 (talk) 08:40, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Detail

message: I am editing a Stronghold 2 wiki and agree this is to much for the main page. I can cut some of the content and put it in the wiki with it own page and links to it on both Wikipedia and Wiki.   Clubber-t (talk) 05:31, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stronghold Wiki

message: I found this: Play Magazine interview. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 03:53, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference material 

message: Last month ago. Firefly Studio rereleased Stronghold 2 into Stronghold 2: Steam Edition. Some section are outdated now. --AsyrafFile (talk) 04:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steam Edition
Talk:Transportation in Hamilton, Ontario

message: I am concerned that this article is becoming link spam.  I don't think we need to list every shop, stop and washroom in the City.  Please see WP:NOT. Alan.ca 14:17, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
File talk:Portuguese empire.png

message: Greenland?? 84.219.25.93 14:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The map still remains misleading and highly inaccurate, since it implies control and sovereignty over the colored lands & shores; this is , however, not at all the case in Newfoundland. As someone wrote above: this map simply shows every piece of coast ever visited by a Portuguese ship, including Africa all around. --Janneman 20:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The UK for example doesn't need to have control of the Sandwich Islands. It's not need to have a soldier in every square meter of terrain. Let's discuss this on the portuguese empire page (in "exploration=empire?") where it is more visible to someone who wants to talk about it, as it is an interesting discussion.Câmara 12:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alas, the OK does have control of the Sandwich Islands, and it is internationally recognized; You shuold know how the UK responded when Argentina pushed ITS claim to the Sandwichs (not only the Falklands). The map is still BS and should be deleted. --Janneman 17:50, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. That didn't happen 500 years ago: only Portugal claimed it. Portugal explored it and claimed it. The international recognition was the treaty of Tordesillas, by "Spain" and the Pope, everything east of the line was portuguese (newfoundland wasn't but at that time was difficult to know; of course portuguese cartographers moved it the more to the east they could). And nobody else claimed it.Câmara 19:02, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

text: alrighters, so why don't you just color half the globe blue? --Janneman 19:24, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Because Portugal didn't claim all half the world and/or there were countries that opposed. All the coast of Africa except the mediterranean and red sea was claimed and there were no recognized/organized states there that opposed portuguese claim. The existing ones tolerated portuguese presence (like Kingdom of Congo) or were destroyed. In Asia Portugal had diplomatic ties with asiatic states: Persia, some indian kingdoms, Siam, China, Japan, for example. When do you think Brazil become portuguese? In 1500 when Cabral discovered it or in the 1530's when it was started to be colonised?Câmara 20:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Greenland has never been a Portuguese. --Arigato1 07:32, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greenland lol
Talk:Binomial inverse theorem

message: This seems to be the same as the Woodbury matrix identity. I guess these pages should be merged? -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 14:19, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely. Also, this page has no citations as to where the title is from. Jmath666 06:54, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Actually, it is slightly more general. But it should be merged just the same. Jmath666 07:04, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How is it "slightly more general"?  Just giving more details?  DavidMCEddy (talk) 17:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this should be merged into the Woodbury matrix identity page, not the other way around:  The Woodbury article received 12,435 views in the last 90 days, while this only received 2,493 over the same period.  Of course, we need a redirect, because I know the name "binomial inverse theorem" and not "Woodbury", and I suspect that's true for others.  (On the other hand, I can't volunteer to do the merge.)  DavidMCEddy (talk) 17:33, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 12:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Woodbury

message: I feel that this phrase must be incorrect: "If B = Iq is the identity matrix and q = 1".  Should B not be an p×p matrix in order to be added to A? 128.100.76.56 (talk) 13:38, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the same person (forgot to log in last time).  Nevermind I figured it out.  That special case paragraph is not an extension of the previous special case (I had thought that we had already set and V to Ip).Kiyo.masui (talk) 13:42, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect passage?
Talk:List of stars in Scorpius

message: I added reference to a catalog compiled by Jet Propulsion Laboratory, in the context of pi SCO, aka Nur.  Note Stellarium software labels stars using this reference.  Please consider restructuring my entry to conform with wiki standard.  The web link is https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720005197.pdfGenacGenac (talk) 16:04, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional star catalog
Talk:Extract

message: What do people think about a category related to the above? --Kupirijo 14:25, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New extract/infusion/decoction category 

message: Currently, no mention of other meanings than "An extract is a substance made by extracting a part of a raw material" are mentioned.
While sub-optimal, per se, this becomes a severe problem, because
"excerpt" redirects here.
88.77.148.116 (talk) 00:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other meanings and "excerpt" 

message: Why does excerpt redirect here? There was nothing that I could find that had anything to do with it. 71.236.26.74 (talk) 05:40, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Excerpt redirect
Talk:Intra-frame coding

message: The first words say Inter-frame where it should say Intra-frame.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.148.186.173 (talk) 17:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct, inter frames consist of P- and B-frames sharing data between (inter) themselves and anchor frames (I->P->P and I->B<-P). Next time, be bold. --213.216.199.6 (talk) 14:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct error 

message: This should really be merged with Video compression picture types which contains definition of P and B frames.Henk.muller (talk) 10:16, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: From the article: "It is part of an intra-frame codec like ProRes: a group of pictures codec without inter frames." In what way is ProRes a GOP codec if it has no inter-frames? If it's technically true that ProRes is a GOP codec, perhaps this sentence could be re-worded to be less confusing, because as it is it seems to contradict the "Group of pictures" article. If it's not a GOP codec, perhaps this should be rewritten. Thanks. Chconnor (talk) 20:02, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought the same. I would define ProRes in opposition to GoP codecs. 210.54.156.2 (talk) 06:30, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is ProRes a GOP codec? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://users.cs.cf.ac.uk/Dave.Marshall/Multimedia/node248.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  ARandomName123 (talk)Ping me!  18:00, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:History of the Jews in Malta

message: Larbot - run by User:Lar -  t/c 14:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article was selected for [[WP:DYK|DYK]]! 

message: The article contains the text:
The history of the Jews in Malta dates to approximately 1500 BC. Although the population was probably never in a number greater than 1,000 inhabitants, their presence probably dates back to the Hebrew seafaring tribes of Zebulun and Asher. 
1500 BC is clearly too early to speak of tribes of Israel (usually associated with the early kingdoms, hence about 900 BC). Put into context, 1500 BC is 200+ years before the traditional date for the life of Moses. 
A date of 1500 BC is certainly credible for a significant role of hebrew speakers in Malta though, as Malta would have figured as part of the Phonecian trade route and likely accomodated Phonecian settlers.
Comments?
--Philopedia 04:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article speaks of "Hebrew seafaring tribes" not of Jews. The Jews of Malta can, however, be traced back to these "Hebrew seafaring tribes".
See the  article by Aline P'nina Tayar, she writes:
"a carved menorah in the catacombs of Rabat as well as a Phoenician inscription discovered at the Ggantija temple in Xaghra point to a Jewish presence, which is thought to date back to the Hebrew seafaring tribes of Zebulun and Asher"
--Carabinieri 11:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, thanks a lot.--Carabinieri 12:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There were no Jews in 1500 BCE. And we don't have a reliable source for the inscription. Dougweller (talk) 13:47, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1500 BC too early to speak of a Jewish presence 

message: At the bottom,under History of the Jews in Europe, please unredden the red words,thanx alot!(Trampton 20:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: HELP ME ON THIS!
Talk:SDS 930

message: I have some old photos in the loft of one of these, and the front panel I will get them down and scan them sometime.
I think this computer is important being the first to move away from valves/tubes.
In the documentation with it there was a statistical justification for moving
to solid state (reliability stats of transistors vs. tubes).
Robin48gx 14:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First?  Not by a long shot - see list of transistorized computers - 1964 was just about the *end* of the age of discrete transistors in mainframes.There were British,French, Polish and Chinese mainframes made of transistors, by then. The reference source I added says it was the first to use all silicon semiconductors, which might be true and a first.  --Wtshymanski (talk) 00:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

text: To clarify, credentials of an editor are not as important on Wikipedia as citing sources. And you cannot guess a person's credentials or field of expertise from their user name. Several manuals are already scanned in at bitsavers, and both the 1966 and 1969 edition (using the XDS moniker) say it was two's complement. Page A-10. W Nowicki (talk) 00:16, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Old comments
Talk:Perdita Hyde-Sinclair

message: The bulk of the article is written like a blurb.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harper Collins is greater than j00 (talk • contribs) 16:23, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Fremantle Town Hall

message: The architects that designed the town hall were Griffiths and Considine who described the building thus: 
Unlikely. Later company. But worth putting back with a little rewrite. Suspect they did heritage council assessment or revamp at most. Hope this helps.  Like the art generally. Fred 14:33, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While this quote may certainly be unlikely, I will check my resources. I did get the quote from a book of that time, but I will try and find more evidence. --Ali K 05:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I was unclear. The only unlikely part (from my dodgy memory) was the bit I struck out.  "... that designed ..." Everthing else is good.  I meant fix (if needed) and put it back, today. Maybe I should have left it there.   Fred 07:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay, slightly reworded :) Thanks, --Ali K 08:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: and slightly reworded again, to imply something altogether different.  Fred 11:26, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Architecture
Talk:Molucca Sea

message: The Molucca Sea is located in the western Pacific Ocean, within the country of Indonesia. This statement needs to be backed up by a good citation, otherwise I propose it should read within the country of Indonesia - if someone can prove that under international law that the Pacific Ocean actually has precedence in name and context over bordering seas - there is a very misleading starting statement to an article here. Relevant international or Indonesian sources would be appreciated SatuSuro 14:42, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assertion of sea boundaries
Talk:Parkside Church

message: Today someone removed the re-direct and restored the un-formatted text of the previous article.  The new text had a few differences from the old, but still did not address the concerns brought up in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parkside Church, which decided that this article should redirect to the article on the pastor.  I have reverted to the redirect for now, but if someone thinks that the church should have its own article, I would encourage them to defend that position on the talk page. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 15:57, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church having seperate article.
Talk:Bamako Initiative

message: This article is a copyvio from  so I reworded a few sentences and removed the rest. Sincerely, Mattisse 14:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is exactly what I hoped somewhat would do. Thanks you!!! Themalau 23:04, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jack Sugden

message: I have given this article a B grade as it contains what I believe to be a significant amount of information available on this character. Given the character's length in the show (currently the longest serving who is still active), he is an intergral part of Emmerdale, and hence I feel the article deserves to be of mid-importance. Bungle44 19:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating

message: I have removed inaccurate information on the fire that killed Sarah Sugden and updated the page with correct details. Smurfmeister  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smurfmeister (talk • contribs) 10:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy

message: I suppose he'll be killed off now. Keep an eye out for mention of that (probably a throwaway line, since it'll be off-screen) and for a dedication to the actor. Digifiend (talk) 11:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Killed off? 

message: Per WP:NFCC, each use of a copyrighted image needs to be justified. The rationales on the image pages need to address exactly why an image should be used as against text, and so far, my impression is that some of them are purely decorative, which is not a proper use of fair-use images. Please address this ASAP. --Rodhullandemu 18:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible overuse of non-free images 
Talk:LBC 97.3

message: I'd love to do an article on Modlin. The very first phone-in radio I ever heard were Brian Hayes and then, late at night, the contrast of the warm and genial Modlin. I understand he used to present spots on Radio 4's Today programme during the 60s? Getting enough info for an article is proving hard though - would welcome any help. Plutonium27 (talk) 14:34, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There already is one Montague_Modlyn --Penbat (talk) 12:19, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monty Modlin
Talk:Kross (software)

message: Regarding "While Kross allows the scripter to write scripts in a language of their choice, AppleScript is one given language". Is that really true? At least on System 7 the "open" in "Open Scripting Architecture (OSA)" meant that other scripting languages existed. Frontier is one such language. And Open Scripting Architecture states: "Under Mac OS X, the JavaScript OSA component remains the only serious OSA language alternative to AppleScript". --Mortense (talk) 17:12, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AppleScript singularity 

message: https://community.kde.org/Schedules/Frameworks
I cant see, where to fill in that info  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShalokShalom (talk • contribs) 23:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Version
Talk:Sicilian Wars

message: The article Battle of Syracuse (387 BC) is not linked from this article. I have a feeling that the date of the battle is wrong. Can somebody fix all of this?--SkiDragon (talk) 05:16, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. Is now proposed for deletion. --Proofreader (talk) 13:16, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned article 

message: Okay are they called the Greek-Punic wars or Sicilian wars?174.17.171.195 (talk) 19:20, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I am a Sicilian archaeologist and I want to write here because this is a huge mistake! This page is limited to episodes of Sicilian battles during the whole Greek-Punic wars: the Greek-Punic wars are a phenomenon that involved all the Western Mediterranean. The text seems to me highly restrictive: it is necessary to update it with the latest research (as the latest book Le guerre senza nome. L'epico scontro fra greci e cartaginesi by Ferruggia A., 2014, which is the most comprehensive and updated work on this phenomenon) and it is necessary to change the title of the page: Sicilian Wars, mistakenly, limits and does not contextualize geographically that phenomenon. The correct name with which they are known in literature is Greek-Punic Wars, so please change the name of the page and return to the first one. Thank you --EliBo1975 (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek-Punic wars or Sicilian wars 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support per the nominator. Constantine   ✍  13:02, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: a serious attempt should be made to source the article and undo the narrative, which presents the carthaginians as cartoon heroes and the greeks as cartoon villains, or the article should merely be removed. 107.179.229.114 (talk) 15:09, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article is written like a cartoon narrative from a pro-carthaginian perspective and has almost no sourcing
Talk:Brentwood Cathedral

message: Why is there no mention of the modernist extension which preceded the Terry extension? As the entry stands, it reads as if the Terry extension was built onto the original church with nothing inbetween which was not the case and in fact makes for a far more interesting story of a modernist extension being built (as I recall in the 1960s) very much in the spirit of the Church at the time, found wanting in practical terms (cf. Cardross seminary) and then demolished to be replaced by a neo-classical extension from the opposite end of the architectural spectrum (and far better from a practical point of view I might add).
The modernist extension was constructed between 71 and 73. It was very much of it's time and had two partitioned rooms which could be opened up for busy occasions. It was built just before the adjoining st. Helen's  primary school and convent moved to sawyers hall lane. I too am amazed that all traces of it seemed to have been erased. I can't find any references to it or photographs or anything. Myredroom (talk) 18:06, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Huilo-Huilo Biological Reserve

message: Both the source and the destination articles are very short and on their own might even be considered as lacking sufficient importance to justify remaining as an article in Wikipedia.   Combining the two would give them a bit more weight and perhaps avoid deletion. --JAXHERE | Talk 14:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old merge discussion

message: Viktor Petermann was a Luftwaffe pilot. Is he related or the father of
Viktor Petermann? FloridaArmy (talk) 13:55, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Viktor and Victor
Talk:Bishop of Brentwood

message: We could do with a photo of the Bishop. Bewareoftheevilcheeseman 14:57, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment