Talk:List of Air New Zealand destinations

message: We should remove all destinations ONLY served by Mount Cook Airline. WhisperToMe (talk) 03:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Mount Cook Airline's route network is 100% integrated with that of Air New Zealand, and the decision as to which cities are served by it (or by other nominal subsidiaries) is made entirely based on which aircraft type Air NZ wants for that particular route. Functionally, Mount Cook Airline is an operating division of Air NZ, not a separate airline in its own right. -- Vardion (talk) 05:23, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: With Delta Air Lines Comair is a wholly owned subsidiary, yet it has its own destination list. You could use a separate color for Mount Cook and the other airlines - just as long as the man doesn't become too cluttered. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:14, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Comair, as far as I can tell, is more independent of Delta in its operations than Mount Cook Airline is of Air New Zealand. A better comparison, I think, would be trying to show Delta's 737 flights and 757 flights as if they were separate from each other. Mount Cook Airline's independence is a technicality maintained for operational reasons, not something that actually matters for determining what airports are part of the Air NZ network — showing the subsidiary services separately doesn't add anything (and in my view, actually adds confusion — a town's status as connected to Air NZ's network isn't dependent on which particular aircraft the company choses to fly there, and that's the only distinction that exists between mainline Air NZ and the subsidiaries). -- Vardion (talk) 09:17, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The distinction between Comair and Delta is that Comair operates smaller aircraft - It's similar to American Airlines and American Eagle, or Singapore Airlines and SilkAir, or EVA Air and Uni Air - What is different is when the commuter airline is operated by a distinct company, i.e. with Mesa Airlines's various commuter airlines. WhisperToMe (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Again (and perhaps I'm wrong), all of those examples seem to be more distinct from their parent airlines than Mount Cook Airline. But for me, the fundamental point is: does showing Mount Cook Airline separately give a more accurate and/or useful portrayal of how the airline functions in practice? I believe that the answer is quite definitely in the negative — separating mainline Air NZ from its subsidiaries presents a misleading picture which pays more attention to behind-the-scenes technicalities of corporate structure than to how things actually work. Mount Cook Airline's status isn't actually in any way important to determining which cities are served by Air NZ — in this case, there is no practical difference between the airline and its subsidiaries (Silk Air, say, is certainly not an equivalent situation). -- Vardion (talk) 21:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since ANZ link carriers have their own articles, their destinations should not included in ANZ destinations page in any layout form.116.71.8.148 (talk) 13:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  destinations 

message: What the project page has see:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Airlines/page_content#Destinations
* Destination lists should always be sorted by country, not by city. They should also have the ability to be sorted by the reader
'''
So by that it should go back to the previous layout country first followed by city etc 
Regards CHCBOY (talk) 23:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table layout 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Air New Zealand destinations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150623103813/http://airlineroute.net/2015/04/23/rp-nzdfw/ to http://airlineroute.net/2015/04/23/rp-nzdfw/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:01, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Air New Zealand destinations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081031095811/http://www.airnewzealand.co.nz/resources/company_history_feb_06.pdf to http://www.airnewzealand.co.nz/resources/company_history_feb_06.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130207014433/http://www.airnewzealand.co.nz/press-release-2012-more-japanese-visitors-expected-this-summer-as-air-new-zealand-boosts-charter-programme to http://www.airnewzealand.co.nz/press-release-2012-more-japanese-visitors-expected-this-summer-as-air-new-zealand-boosts-charter-programme
*Added  tag to http://www.ifids.airnewzealand.co.nz/statimg/investor/pdf/data_handbook98.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150925091525/http://www.airnewzealand.co.nz/press-release-2004-new-daily-service-in-wanaka to http://www.airnewzealand.co.nz/press-release-2004-new-daily-service-in-wanaka
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:55, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: LAX is hardly a focus city, especially now that LHR flights are discontinued. Is there a definitive source showing Air New Zealand considers it a focus city? Mirza Ahmed (talk) 21:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  LAX focus city? 

message: What's the preferred layout here when a previously terminated destination re-appears?  Add a second line for the same city? -- Chuq (talk) 08:19, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct so it will be just like Taipei which has been started twice now. CHCBOY (talk) 12:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks  - it's obvious now - I must have been looking with my eyes closed! -- Chuq (talk) 00:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: Hello everyone! I've seen some of any destination pages of an airline and I thought maybe we should update this List of Air New Zealand destinations tables like removing start and ended date, remove some highlight by replacing this Airline hub, Airline seasonal, Terminated and Airline focus templates, remove the IATA and ICAO (not necessarily btw) and add the rowspan for a lot of cities serving on that country. I hope you'll understand what I said and yeah.. I hope you'll agreeing with me. Thanks!  Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 10:05, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean, some of all airline destinations pages didn't put the start date column. But if you disagree, maybe we can remove the highlights by replacing "Airline hub, Airline seasonal, Terminated and Airline focus templates, remove the IATA and ICAO column and add the rowspan for a lot of cities serving on that country." I hope you understand what I'm saying.  Cornerstone2.0 (talk) 11:24, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing tables removing unknown date, added rowspan etc 

message: Air NZ did fly to the former Hong Kong airport at Kai Tak as what is showing in the 1968 timetable images used in the ref. So it was not only the new airport served since 1998. CHCBOY (talk) 00:50, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  HKG 

message: Hi All, Just a heads up It is possible that this article will get deleted as I have noticed others getting deleted recently that also belong to major airlines. Unfortunately they are not allowed on Wikipedia anymore CHCBOY (talk) 14:31, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible deletion