lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Otis Barton

message: The caption "William Beebe (left) and Otis Barton standing next to the bathysphere" did not fit the image provided (this image on commons). The caption is clearly describing this image: this image, which is a better image for the article, but does not seem to be available under CC. For the time being, I have just corrected the caption to fit the current image.
--Aidan (talk) 17:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:NGC 5866

message: :Discussion at Talk:Messier 102
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Move.  Move was done by someone else but not closed here.  —Wknight94 (talk) 15:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested merge with [[Messier Object 102]]

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support for reasons given above. GeorgeJBendo 16:11, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Studies and a color photo published in 2018 by Adam Block, cf. https://www.adamblockphotos.com/ngc-5866.html
clearly show that the "dust line" of NGC 5866 has two components: a typical orange central part of the dust and the blue ends, typical of the stars of the arms of a galaxy. This suggests that it is actually a spiral galaxy. This clarification has been added to the text -- Luxorion
== "Spindle Galaxy" ==
There is another galaxy called NGC 3115 also called the "Spindle Galaxy". I am wondering if this would be slightly confusing or not... User:Hamterous1 (discuss anything!🐹✈️) 01:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morphology 

message: There is another galaxy called NGC 3115 also called the "Spindle Galaxy". I am wondering if this would be slightly confusing or not... User:Hamterous1 (discuss anything!🐹✈️) 01:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Spindle Galaxy"
Talk:Luxating patella

message: I have been going through the list of orthopaedic conditions listed as stubs and suggesting this template for Orthopaedic Conditions (see Talk:Orthopedic surgery) 
Name
Definition
Synonyms
Incidence
Pathogenesis
Pathology
Stages
Classification
Natural History/Untreated Prognosis
Clinical Features
Investigation
Non-Operative Treatment
Risks of Non-Operative Treatment
Prognosis following Non-Operative Treatment
Operative Treatment (Note that each operations should have its own wiki entry)
Risks of Operative Treatment
Prognosis Post Operation
Complications
Management
Prevention 
History
--Mylesclough 05:59, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Responding on your talk page. Thanks for the outline. Elf | Talk 08:07, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

message: This page doesn't make it too clear that it's not only specific to animals. I also have luxating patella. I can probably never do martial arts anymore. OjM (talk) 10:02, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto.  Why is this article primarily about dogs and cats?  Such a strangely random slant to it. ALbino (talk) 22:51, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dogs or People? 

message: Concern 2600:8800:A82:7A00:B96C:1D54:B3F6:9A87 (talk) 14:58, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  My dog, a Chi and 8 lbs has a skip when we walk. It looks cute but I am concerned.
Talk:Methyl formate

message: "Methyl formate has zero ozone depletion potential, zero global warming potential and zero volatile organic compounds."
It doesn't "have" zero volatile compounds. A better wording would be that it is not volatile, but the high vapour pressure and low boiling point contradict this. I would ask somebody to remove the "zero volatile organic compounds" part. On page A3-22 of the given source, the Hydrocarbons section mentions this: "Hydrocarbons are volatile organic compounds (VOCs), contribute to ground level ozone and smog and are regulated in many regions". I assume that somebody assumed that methyl formate is not a VOC due to it not being a simple hydrocarbon, so included this part of the sentence. 
I won't edit the article myself as I don't have an account, just making a strong suggestion.
Thanks
137.43.157.133 (talk) 16:44, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor grammar, possible contradiction. 
Talk:Messier 15

message: Suggest using http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1995/06 for reference at "Its core has undergone a contraction known as 'core collapse' and it has a central density cusp with an enormous number of stars surrounding what may be a central black hole.[citation needed]"
I can't figure out how to go around the two kinds of references present in the article right now... yet. --VoidLurker (talk) 11:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for "citaiton needed"
Talk:Messier 21

message: This page was previously incorrectly titled "Globular Cluster M21".--Kalsermar 19:46, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Move all.  —Wknight94 (talk) 21:15, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Messier 22

message: The 12:39, 17 January 2009 Nine9s version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to enforce an already existing article there.--Wing (talk) 14:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation into Chinese Wikipedia 
Talk:Messier 26

message: One thing this article needs is a photograph of M26 --Kalsermar 21:13, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Move all.  —Wknight94 (talk) 21:15, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph requested
Talk:Messier 29

message: Was this cited study published in a peer-reviewed journal? What was its results? It seems to me this is a non-notable, self-published work. Awolf002 01:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variable star study 

message: I have removed the following:
::The star has another name known as the barney Lukey star in the Intergalactic Star Databace.
I won't validate the databse with a link - its one of those where you can  choose any star and 'name it' by registering way YOU call it; yes some of thase databases will allow you to 'rename' Aldebaran as 'Fred' , for example. These databases may mean someone gets a nice certificate and a warm feeling inside, but if people wish to invest their money naming stars in these databases it is NOT encyclopaedic information in line with WP:notability. Stub Mandrel (talk) 16:23, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paid for 'Star Database' names have no wider validity
Talk:Messier 35

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Move all.  —Wknight94 (talk) 21:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I feel the image for M-35 is not a good presentation of this object.
NASA's 2MASS is an infrared survey, and therefore is not sensitive to the blue stars that constitute a majority of stars in M-35.
The much more distant cluster NGC2158 shows up nicely, but not M-35.
I have not searched for a better image in the public domain, but there must be something better.
--Iverp (talk) 03:46, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improve the image of Messier 35
Talk:Messier 36

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Move all.  —Wknight94 (talk) 21:18, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that the picture is wrong. It is showing M29. Is that correct? Georgipetrov 18:12, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Picture

message: Is Holoea worth a mention here, even though it doesn't seem to be in the cluster itself?
https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/356885-holoea-for-the-new-year/
Hcobb (talk) 12:36, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section for Holoea?
Talk:Odds & Sods

message: I'm not understanding how the title "Odds and Sods" would pop up for an album. Where did it come from? And how does it describe the content? Also, am I correct in my saying Roger Daltrey designed the cover? According to www.thewho.net,it was indeed designed by him, but you never know.
:A belated answer, but what the hell: "odds and sods" is an English expression referring to assortment of various things. Like "odds and ends". --Jacj 15:04, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this question was not discussed properly and for the sake of albums continuity, I have changed it to compilation album. In case you differ, please discuss.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoursvivek (talk • contribs) 13:25, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This album consists of fresh material released for the first time in '74 and the later expanded CD and rock encyclopedia's all refer to it as a general release, not a compilation (of previously released material.) 50.111.3.17 (talk) 23:57, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's with the name?
Category talk:Guns N' Roses songs

message: Something might be off about this category.  Any articles that have this category don't appear.  It probably has to do with the apostrophe.  This was the reason I created an alternative version of this category without the apostrophe,  but if someone could get it to work with the apostrophed category, thanks. Jnkel 03:56, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Schizophonic (Geri Halliwell album)

message: Is it needed to be updated on sales?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.109.157.165 (talk) 00:44, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales 

message: Hi Wikipedians, apologies if this is not the correct way to handle this but ...
A Revision as of 13:50, 28 January 2011 to this page added a comment that the album name Schizophonic is "stylized as Schizö-phonic". Does anyone have a source for this assertion? Although at first glance the white version of the cover does appear to say "schizö-phonic", on closer inspection it is clearly a small ellipse or "halo" above the letter "o", and not an umlaut. Similarly, the "o" of schizo in the red version has tiny "devil's horns". That would be consistent with the album's theme, and also with the similar halo ring over Geri's head in the white-version inside photo (in the CD edition booklet), and as mentioned in the album covers section.
I wanted to check here before making an edit to remove this statement entirely, or perhaps changing it to "stylised as schizo-phonic with a halo, or devil's horns, over the first letter o" (and before making a fool of myself if I'm wrong!). Thanks.
Essercizi (talk) 09:08, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect stylised album title "Schizö-phonic"?
Talk:Airborne Warning and Control System

message: It was my understanding that AWACS was a US Military-specific acronym for their Airborne Early Warning aircraft detection systems.  As such, aircraft such as the E-3 Sentry are properly called AWACS, but aircraft such as the Russian Candid are not.  Can someone with more information than I confirm/provide a source on this?  
If this is the case, then references to non-American should be removed from this article.  209.195.164.34 15:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also depends on the relative sizes of each side's sensors. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gparker (talk • contribs) 06:54, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: AWACS versus [[Airborne Early Warning]]

message: Should Brazil's R-99 AWACS be included? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.235.66.254 (talk) 00:29, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - added. MilborneOne 21:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brazil 

message: Can anyone help with how to call up the NATO flag?   calls up all the NATO Countries and the FLAG is shown, but not inserted!?
Thanks, Specialmissions 01:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NATO Flag 

message: This aircraft, formerly know as ASTOR, is a battlefield support aircraft similar to the US JSTARS.  The article written specifically on Raytheon Sentinel states this.  It is not considered an AWACS or AEW aircraft.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Specialmissions (talk • contribs) 17:44, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Raytheon Sentinel]] 

message: Perhaps someone with more experience than I, could order the list of countries? Specialmissions 23:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. MilborneOne 09:55, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Users in alphabetical order? 

message: should the PLAAF be added too? they now have their AWACS as well
-Ralliart (talk)ravenshield936  —Preceding comment was added at 00:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so. I don't know enough myself about the topic, but seing some pages such as  Rob1bureau (talk) 23:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks for the good link btw. TheAsianGURU (talk) 00:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  China ? 

message: Iraq also developed AWACS base on Il-76 airframes, called Baghdad-1 and Adnan-1. Some were eportedly flown to Iran during the 1991 Gulf War. There is no much information about them tough. Rob1bureau (talk) 23:10, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iraq ?
Talk:Argyle (pattern)

message: "Post war squareness reaches an all-time high.... Boys can't get enough Argyle."
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/40069
:You do realise the nature of the Onion, right?  86.154.247.225 (talk) 11:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mentioned in the onion 

message: Hope I'm not being heavy-handed deleting this info. OK, the fabric may be newsworthy for a while but there are 2 main problems I see. 
1) It seems too ephemeral for an encyclopedia article - and a Facebook fan page doesn't help it seem more substantial - and 
2) It's not a typical argyle pattern - some would say not a true argyle - no criss-cross lines.
Please let me know if this is out of line with the approach of more experienced editors. Lelijg (talk) 17:01, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I made some other, hopefully constructive, additions too! Lelijg (talk) 17:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norwegian curling team's outfits in 2010 Winter Olympics
Talk:Rod Kanehl

message: Why is he only "regarded as" the first Met to hit a grand slam?  Is this qualifier here because he is generally claimed to have been the first, but there's someone else who really is the first; because he is the first recorded Met to do so but there might be others before him who aren't; or what?  Please clarify.  --Kelly Martin 05:21, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ornella Muti

message: Her sister Claudia was born in 1951 and so is not a twin.
Ornella survived the Dec. 26 2004 tsunami while swimming in the Maldives Islands.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Loobooyo (talk • contribs) 04:23, 2006 July 3 (UTC)
She ddin't make her American film debut with 'Flash Gordon,' because it is a UK film not USA.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingbotk (talk • contribs) 00:10, 2006 August 17 (UTC)
Actually "Flash Gordon' was a U.S- British film, so technically she did  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dantt777 (talk • contribs) 05:57, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Miscellaneous
Talk:Arthur Streeton

message: Hmmm. I just went to the Australian Art Gallery in Sydney yesterday, and most of the paintings are in there. I should see if I can get some info on him from there. - Ta bu shi da yu 05:33, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This section contradicts itself: How can Settler's Camp be the record price for his painting at $800k "remaining the record price for his work" if Golden Summer was bought in the 80s for $3.5 million? Cfitzart 01:45, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: One was a private sale, one was at auction. Geoff/Gsl 02:22, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prices 

message: This article is a good start on one of Australia's greatest painters, but I feel its bias towards Melbourne doesn't give Streeton's whole life justice. Why is there no mention of the artist's camps at Sirius Cove, and the years Streeton spent painting Sydney Harbour and areas around Western Sydney? And there is only 1 small paragraph on his 13 years in England in the 1900's - and no reference at all to the 6 months he spent in Venice and the gorgeous paintings he created there. But, as nobody outside Australia has heard of Arthur Streeton, I guess its good that there is something here on him. —The preceding comment was added by Ozzy marco (talk • contribs) 21:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sydney? England? Venice? 

message: HI..wow..this lady on our block..showed me a painting by Arthur Streeton..maybe 10inches by..12 inches..on canvas..framed with  paper on the back..I think she said..its of Sydney..harbour back in teh day..of a little ferry in the bay.." waht would taht be worth...Her grandmother just gave it to her today.wow...ok..thats it..jsut trying to get a ballpark figure on this..piece..
Ingrid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.216.16.74 (talk) 05:50, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  next door neigbor has one of his.. 
Talk:David Rovics

message: The claim “Rovics has been accused of antisemitism and Holocaust denial due to having interviewed…” seems to have no sourcing. The claim he had interviewed certain individuals has sourcing, but there appears to be no sourcing for the “accused of” claims. Harmful claims about a living person should be particularly well-sources, not included with no source. This should be removed. Information on significant interviews could remain without including unsourced opinion statements about them.  SM-Mara (talk) 15:54, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Worse, the "source" is anonymous and the accusation amounts to guilt by association. This also despite Rovics being a Jew. KetchupSalt (talk) 14:20, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Have edited the section. BobFromBrockley (talk) 18:21, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah this seems more accurate. I was going to object that Rovics does consider Heimbach to be a fascist, but on his blog he calls Heimbach a "former" rightwinger and says that he's "not a fascist". Personally I think Rovics gives Heimbach way too much benefit of the doubt, seemingly because Heimbach is a person. Interestingly Heimback seems to identify as a nazbol these days. If Rovics reads this then I would suggest he reevaluate his opinion about this one fan of his. KetchupSalt (talk) 13:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited claims in BLP 

message: Just a minor quibble about the wording in the accusation section. It makes it seems like Atzmon is a white nationalist, which as far as I can tell isn't the case. The Gilad Atzmon article only says that he appears in WN media, which is kinda sus as the kids say, but is probably not enough to label him a WN, especially if he does not self-describe as such. I tried rewording the section a bit to clarify this but it became very awkward. The associations with WN, Holocaust denial and antisemitism are certainly accurate for Barrett and (at the time) Heimbach, unless I've missed something. KetchupSalt (talk) 13:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Also it may be worthwhile to mention that Rovics is a critic of the tactic of deplatforming. KetchupSalt (talk) 13:34, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Atzmon a white nationalist?
Talk:University of Strathclyde

message: The article claims that the University is Scotland's second oldest, however this cannot be correct. St Andrews and Glasgow University are older.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.155.112.252 (talk) 13:59, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Take another look. It says Glasgow's second oldest (out of 4 if you count West of Scotland), not Scotland's --Misho (talk) 00:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Is it true that Strathclyde is known as "The Tech" amongst Glaswegians? I'm sure that it's true that students of GU call it such, mostly as a wind-up, but Strathclyde has been a university for a long time now. "Glasgow Tech" referred for a long time to the now CU, as that was its official name (Glasgow Technical College). I'm quite sure that if you asked the average Glaswegian for directions to the "Tech", they'd send you to CU. Glasgow University students are not "your average Glaswegian". (Full disclosure - I went to Strathclyde, but this doesn't change the fact that "the Tech" is used by GU students, not common at all amongst the average Glaswegian). Camillus (talk) 15:32, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Tech?"

message: (I'm posting this to all articles on UK universities as so far discussion hasn't really taken off on Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities.)
There needs to be a broader convention about which university rankings to include in articles. Currently it seems most pages are listing primarily those that show the institution at its best (or worst in a few cases). See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Universities#University ratings. Timrollpickering 22:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: University ratings

message: Should those who haven't actually obtained a degree from Strathclyde still be classed as alumni? For example, ostensibly, Jim Murphy has been on sabbatical since 1992 - depending on how you look at it, he's either a drop out or still a student.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.250.127.116 (talk) 00:46, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Alumni

message: If we are going to have David Livingstone on the front page as an alumnus, we need to clarify the status of Anderson's College School of Medicine, which was split off in 1887 when the rest of the Andersonian University became a technical college and carried on as an independent institution until it merged with the University of Glasgow in 1947. We need more details than are currently to be found in the List of historical medical schools in the United Kingdom. NRPanikker (talk) 10:39, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medical School
Talk:Erdős–Borwein constant

message: It's an interesting number of course, but what of it?  A constant that is irrational, and can be expressed as it is shown.  That's all great, but aside from that, is there any use found for it in other mathematical topics?  Does it correspond with anything in nature (like logarithmic spirals can be found in the arrangement of sunflower florets)?  Seems like it would be good to include this information here, if it is exists.  I couldn't find anything online, but perhaps I looked in the wrong places?  Cyberherbalist (talk) 20:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I added some references, including one showing that this particular constant is relevant for the analysis of algorithms. As for how I found it: by following the link to the MathWorld page and looking at the references listed there. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:06, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Constants such as this are commonly investigated in number theory. You'd be amazed at the amount of ink spilled on stuff like this; people love to obtain relationships on these kinds of things. The Borweins are among the most capable and respected of the practitioners, but there are many. For addtional references, look at Philippe Flajolet's "Analytic Combinatorics". While I haven't looked, it's hard to imagine that this constant would be absent from that book. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 15:13, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see it there but the article does already include an algorithmic application to the analysis of heapsort. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this interesting?
Talk:Marion Keene

message: http://marionkeene-singer.blogspot.com   is the web site you can send photos or stories to see if I can add them to wikipedia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ronshelley (talk • contribs) 21:56, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled