lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Maserati Sebring

message: The sidebar reads "Body style:	2+2 coupé, 2-seat spyder".  However, I have never found any evidence that a convertible version of the Sebring was ever produced by Maserati, or by Vignale for Maserati; I believe that only coupe bodies were made.  Can anyone confirm the existence of any Sebring spyders? Bricology (talk) 07:44, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spyder variant? I doubt it. 
Talk:Stepping Out (play)

message: I love this show both as a play and as a film. I've only seen amateur productions of the play but they have all been great fun. I think that there must be something about the play which makes people enjoy appearing in it. Thank you, Richard Harris, for writing it! Derek Ross | Talk 06:40, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Excellent

message: All the statements under the new section Background are unsubstantiated; I cannot find any references for them. As they are supposed quotes from a living person if they remain unreferenced to independent and original third party sources they should be removed... I shall remove them if nothing is offered. Please add objections to removal, or comments, here. Acabashi (talk) 13:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 9 Feb 2011 

message: I do not believe this play has received a Moliere Award. If you can find confirmation - and I have tried hard - then replace the sentence. Caesar's Daddy (talk) 18:49, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moliere Award
Talk:The Room (play)

message: I stumbled upon a film adaptation of "The Room" in five parts on Youtube.  It's directed by Robert Altman and stars Linda Hunt, Donald Pleasance, Annie Lennox, and Julian Sands.  I was looking for more information about it and thought there might be something here, at least a brief mention.134.224.220.1 (talk) 20:35, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Altman film
Talk:War Horse (play)

message: In pictures of the play, I've noticed there are two horses (Joey and another one). However, the synopsis only mentions Joey. Is the other horse just a minor, one-scene character or major part of the plot, like a mare love interest for Joey? --Bialytock&Bloom (talk) 23:01, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The other horse is Topthorn, another stallion - at first a rival of Joey's but later they become friends. He's a major character (ref here ) 86.134.49.197 (talk) 18:13, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis 

message: I have corrected the caption to the image shown, from 'Broadway logo' to 'Logo used for both the UK and US productions'.  This is correct.  The image used may have been physically scanned or copied from a US poster, but it is exactly the same as the UK one - see  for a start.  It is disingenuous to say it is solely the Broadway logo, especially to us UK theatregoers who have been used to seeing that very self same logo round London for 3 and a half years. 81.157.193.129 (talk) 12:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: After my edit was reverted again, I have left a message on the relevant editor's page to alert him/her to this talk page.  He/she left no rationale in the edit summary for repeatedly reverting my correction of his/her misleading caption. 81.156.126.53 (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think you actually know what's going on. My edit added helpful information to the 'Awards and nominations' section, and had nothing to do with the image. Please check information and facts before making accusations, or you may be blocked.--Bialytock&Bloom (talk) 17:33, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: By 59 Productions titled "The making of War Horse - projection and animation" can be found here.  It might have some useful information for the article. 81.147.148.25 (talk) 14:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful video
Category talk:High schools in Washington, D.C.

message: Should this really have :Category:District of Columbia Public Schools as a parent? Doesn't it include both public and private schools? —KCinDC (talk) 21:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see it's been fixed now. —KCinDC (talk) 17:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: District of Columbia Public Schools?
Talk:Faget

message: hi, I have relevant information for this page regarding famous people with that last name.
:As the template says, you need to make a specific request, detailing what edit you want made--Jac16888Talk 17:44, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  want to change. 

message: Could someone change this to the more formal and acceptable "from their album"? 86.182.223.14 (talk) 13:32, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "off of their album"
Talk:List of mayors of Taunton, Massachusetts

message: I found this article about one of Taunton's early mayors, Nathaniel Jarvis Wyeth Fish. I have confirmed this information with another source. --Alan Redgown (talk) 01:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nathaniel J.W. Fish
Talk:Polly Vaughn

message: I don't doubt that Molly Ban is a common English name (that's what the singers I know call it), but looking at the English form Vaughn and knowing that feminine adjectives lenite, is there a tradition of calling this 'Molly Bhán'?  It's just odd that the English form underlies better Irish grammar than the psuedo-Gaelic does.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.162.33.134 (talk) 15:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I do! A search on the Great Britain Family Names surname profiler doesn't show any instances of the surname Ban. The name Bann occurs in the 1881 census, mostly in Birmingham and at a rate of 13 per million. On the other hand, bean is the Irish Gaelic word for "woman". Joe Fogey (talk) 08:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: In some versions the unfortunate young woman is called Molly Bawn, which could easily be a mishearing of Vaughan or vice versa. Joe Fogey (talk) 08:56, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Molly Bhán 

message: There seems to be a lot of unsourced speculation or original research here. This is especially the case for the rifle hypothesis. There's even a contradictory parenthetical statement in the paragraph. All of the hypothetical statements without sources should probably be removed. — ★Parsa ☞ talk 16:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections not sourced, Rifle interpretation 

message: "Moreover, there are no versions known before 1806 [there are number of versions from 1765 to 1806]. We would have expected earlier versions or fragments. This down-to-earth interpretation of the song is rare."
There are no versions before 1806 and then there are a number of versions before 1806. Which is it? Or should there be no versions AFTER 1806. Spiel (talk) 02:59, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory statement
Talk:Jared Y. Sanders Sr.

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Signed,The4lines |||| (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 15:37, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The band Element 115

message: A. This act is notable because of the cumulative value of the following:
1. they are the first in the U.S. to use a virtual character as an integral member of the band on stage. (2nd in the world)
2. they have an album released
3. they are part of an annual international event (Roswell UFO festival)
4. they have been on the radio in at least 2 States (Arizona, New Mexico)
5. they do charity work - the many shows are listed on their web site
B. Why would you take a great layout, based on the wiki Rolling Stones page, and strip it down to boring and minimal?
MediaMike (talk) 01:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: about that last point. the Rolling Stones are the exception, not the rule. This band is clearly not the Rolling Stones. Furthermore, parts of the Rolling Stones page are done incorrectly and need fixing themselves ("Line-up" should be "Personnel", for instance). That's why we have guidelines to format articles to instead of just copying other band articles. tomasz. 10:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Not really, no. It doesn't need fixing to the extent that it needs tagging. And yes, they may be the most famous rock band playing: that's a reason for you not to model your page on theirs, not the other way round. blah blah dogma blah personal attack blah blah accusation of prejudice. tomasz. 10:24, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Ojibway Nation of Saugeen

message: The Ojibway Nation of Saugeen First Nation is surely tautologous, particular since the word nation suggests sovereignty. One sovereignty under another? Tis but a single word, and yet...
In 1995, the Ojibway Nation of Saugeen withdrew from the First Nation with whom they had been grouped and became sovereign: The Ojibway Nation of Saugeen is an Ojibway First Nation.
Did they not then become the: Ojibway of Saugeen First Nation? Is that problematic?
The analogy would be with the Ojibway of Onigaming First Nation.
There is another Saugeen First Nation, so unlike the Onigaming First Nation, the title of the Ojibway of Saugeen First Nation could not be reduced and simplified.
Protozoon (talk) 13:07, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tautology?
Talk:Association of Physicians of Pakistani Descent of North America

message: Please stop vandalizing this page. Seriously.
I second that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omrfmrz (talk • contribs) 04:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:McArthur River uranium mine

message: The name of this article needs changing to McArthur River Uranium Mine. There is a McArthur River lead-zinc mine in Australia. Rolinator (talk) 01:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Especially since it gets confusing considering there is a McArthur River(Actual river, in BOTH locations), McArthur River mine (U), and McArthur River mine, Northern Territory (Pb-Zn).  All are unique yet share the name McArthur River. Turgan (talk) 04:17, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done...better late than never :D--kelapstick (talk) 20:20, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:McClean Lake mine

message: I have not removed the information as yet, but I feel the "Lake McLean" reference is referring to an area in Ontario.  There are many references to this and to the death of George Pelawa, who died in a car accident at age 18, shortly after being drafted by the Calgary Flames.  The song is rumoured to be about him, although why the Ontario reference is unknown.  Google George Pelawa and Lake McLean for more info.  Turgan (talk) 01:39, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the reference. Turgan (talk) 07:29, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia Section
Talk:Myrna Wooders

message: Specifically, what might be the conflict of interest from the author's perspective? Unless one can be specifically addressed, the neutrality alert should be removed, yes?
With respect to notability, Professor Wooders has published extentively in a number of acclaimed peer-reviewed academic journals. One can find an extensive listing of such publications by searching for her name in any reputable academic search engine, or Google Scholar.
What, specifically, is the copy-editing concern associated with the Myrna Wooders page?
GC2maxpro (talk) 20:12, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: conflict of interest
Talk:The Whistle Blower

message: If someone who has seen this film could kindly shorten the summary, provide additional information and add references, it would be much appreciated. If someone who has concerns about national security could voice them somewhere relevant and not insert POV/snipes into the article, that would be appreciated too. Leushenko (talk) 00:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup required
Talk:Jack Shaver

message: Sections of this biographical discussion are taken from the author's own posting at: http://reimer.concordia.ca/Shaver/Biography/LongBio.htm.--BReimer (talk) 00:04, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: note, per the authors talk p., the material is not a copyvio DGG ( talk ) 23:24, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cardinia Road railway station

message: Article says, " Grade separation of the road has also been proposed." Where did this come from and why is it here? - UnbelievableError (talk) 06:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  grade separation 
Talk:University of Cincinnati Bearcat Bands

message: Good start to the article, but we should cite the "Words to Live By", atleast for the extensive history section since you pretty much just copied it straight from there. We may also want to perhaps instead paraphrase that history section, as to avoid plagiarizing the "Words to Live By" and make it a bit more manageable. Right now it seems a bit too long. 129.137.159.207 (talk) 02:44, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasnt pointing fingers or anything, I was just suggesting how to maybe improve the article. I'm not sure about the exactly what the GFDL lisense's either, but I think the history section may be a bit long anyway. From a source point of view it may get tricky anyway, because WTLB aren't really published offically or available to the public. But I'm not sure how to fix that problem... --129.137.159.207 (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Lake Winfield Scott

message: Does anyone have a photo of the lake for the article? Please add one if you can. Thanks, Majoreditor (talk) 02:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Got one with permission from NFS. Majoreditor (talk) 02:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs a photo; can you help?

message: The article now meets the criteria for "B" class, so I'm upgrading it. Although it is relatively short, it is fairly comprehensive. With some additional work this can get to GA-class. Feel free to picth in. It could still use:
*Additional images
*More material on flora & fauna in and around the lake
Other thoughts? Majoreditor (talk) 01:30, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added in another image and additional details on fish and wildlife. After scouring Emory's research library I was able to add additional details on the lake's history. Majoreditor (talk) 03:39, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Upgrading to B class

message: With respect to the Good article criteria, the article complies with the manual of style, and the prose is reasonably good and informative. I also do not see any major WP:NPOV or stability issues, and the images have appropriate copyright tags. There are only two issues as I see it:
* minor: There really needs to be a citation on the fact that the Lake Winfield Scott Trail is an 'easy' trail and parts are wheelchair accessible. Whenever trails like this are rated as 'easy', 'moderate', or 'hard', this should be backed up by some sort of official analysis or it could be construed as someone's point of view.
** I have added in-line citations to a reliable hiking guide for the trail ratings. 
* As a wildlife/nature site, I think the article needs a 'wildlife' section, covering the various flora and fauna in the area. Some of this is covered in a limited manner from a recreational perspective (fishing), but I think a more biological, scientific perspective needs to be covered.
** Created a new section on wildlife. 
Other than these two issues, I think the article meets the GA criteria, and can be promoted once they are addressed. I'll put this article on hold at WP:GAN until February 6, 2008, so these issues can be solved. Cheers! Dr. Cash (talk) 21:27, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the comments, Dr. Cash. I will add citations on trail ratings. To develop a proper wildlife section could take up to one week; I'll start tracking down material. Majoreditor (talk) 21:40, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made the requested enhancements. How does the article look now? Are there any other issues to address? Majoreditor (talk) 14:36, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Review

message: The article would benefit from adding sections on hydrology and construction of the lake/recreation area. Please feel free to add any details you can. Majoreditor (talk) 14:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Future improvements to the article

message: It's Jarrard Gap Trail-not Jarrad Gap Trail.
Please correct.
Thank You,
Sonia Jarrard Gibson  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.65.38.48 (talk) 05:18, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jarrad Gap Trail
Talk:Old Louisiana Governor's Mansion

message: I have added photo of the Old Governor's Mansion, which I took yesterday while in Baton Rouge visiting some family.  The photo certainly isn't the best photo, but one I hope will suffice for the time being, until a better one is obtained.Avazina 02:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo Added 

message: I've added some history about the Mansion, but it certainly isn't complete as I haven't been able to locate a book on "Huey's White House." The information contained should be seen as nothing more than a beginning; anyone having more knowledge of the Mansion's history is encouraged to share it in this article.Avazina 02:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Added 

message: we <3 ya mom. 209.124.218.74 (talk) 01:04, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  yamombomb.com
Talk:Gatineau (territory equivalent to a regional county municipality)

message: Surely there's a shorter name that could be used? Gromlakh (talk) 02:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The official phrase used in government documents is territoire équivalent à une MRC "territory equivalent to an RCM". But I think Wikipedia doesn't allow abbreviations in titles. An alternative would be "geographical regional county municipality", but it's less specific since it also includes true RCMs.Joeldl (talk) 11:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Trevor Sprigg

message: Trevor Sprigg's personal MP page includes all the information that this article is missing - including date of birth, place of birth, etc.  As I'm not sure how to reference material within an article, I've added the details, and included the reference for people to update (http://www.mp.wa.gov.au/tsprigg/). Grover (talk) 04:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1988 360 km of Sandown Park

message: VES Kanda is not the name of the car. It was built in 1986 as an Australian intepretation of C1, but used the commonplace and rather too thirsty for the regs 6.0 litre small block Chev. The name came from a combination of initials of the owner (Bernie van Elsen) and constructor of the car (K & A Engineering: bernie Van ElSen K AND A engineering. So VES Kanda isn't really right. --Falcadore (talk) 08:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Veskanda 
Talk:James Gordon (Canadian musician)

message: Read the referrences.  Or verify on allmusic.com. Pustelnik (talk) 04:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notablility

message: noable by criteria of international performer, composer of notable songs (internal links in article) and member of notable group (Tamarack)
Data can be verified at allmusic.com
*I agree, and I have added a link to allmusic.com --Eastmain (talk) 04:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Text transferred from article page

message: Sources seem to disagree.  Pustelnik (talk) 00:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth Year
Talk:Peter Phipps (admiral)

message: His place of birth is uncertain. For example Who's Who in New Zealand (8th edition 1964) says Milton while the Navy's official war history (page 244) says Whitby, England. 
Likewise his date of birth is uncertain. For example the Dictionary of New Zealand Biography says 7 December 1908 while the Navy's official war history (page 244) says 7 June 1909.
Although this can't be cited as a source, a person I know who knew him well when he was alive says that Phipps himself didn't know where or when he was born or who his father was.--Geronimo20 (talk) 00:51, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed an (uncited) claim that Phipps's place of birth was Sydney. --Epipelagic (talk) 04:21, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncertain date and place of birth
Talk:Arch Street Friends Meeting House

message: Was Edward Hicks really a member there?  I know it spent much of his life as a member of Newtown Meeting (where he was buried), but that he also moved around a bit.  --Ahc (talk) 03:32, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The cited article at USHistory.org says he attended the Yearly Meeting (see last red-bullet point, way down the page). If you think "member of the congregation" is too strong a term, you might want to re-phrase it.--BillFlis (talk) 12:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hicks

message: There a conflict between whether a regularly formatted gallery or a packed galler is better.  I contend that packed galleries look awful
Here's what I see on this article with a regular gallery
And here's what I see with a "packed" gallery:
The regular gallery is orderly, well balanced and presents the images at a large enough size to be seen.  The packed gallery is disorderly, unbalanced, unsightly, takes up unnecessary space, and creates blocks of unsightly and unusable white space.  I see absolutly no advantage to it. BMK (talk) 15:33, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like BillFlis fixed the problem by limiting the heights, for which we has my thanks! BMK (talk) 18:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regular vs. "packed" gallery 
Talk:Field coil

message: I'm taking over this redirect to stator because field coils are not always on the stator so it's not really correct as a redirect to there.
I don't really have time to work on this article right now, but this is going to get some major expansion, with text and illustrations of series wound, shunt-wound, and compound-wound field coils.
DMahalko (talk) 03:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

message: I've been going through articles and trying to clean up confusion about the difference between field/armature and rotor/stator. This article had some text indicating that the field of a motor is always on the stator, and the armature is always the rotor. Then,
for generators, for generators, "Accordingly the field is mounted on the rotor and supplied through slip rings.".  Actually, both geometries are possible for both types of machines. Big generators generally have the armature on the stator, so the heavy output currents don't go through slip rings. (There's a variant on this where the field windings are on the rotor, and they're energized from a second smaller generator on the same shaft fed through diodes, all on the rotor. This eliminates all slip rings and brushes, the most troublesome components.)  Smaller generators can go either way.  Permanent magnet motors come in both rotor magnet  and field magnet forms. "Brushless DC" motors are rotor magnet devices, with no electrical connection to the rotor. Most small toy motors are stator magnet motors. John Nagle (talk) 06:34, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Field/armature vs rotor/stator. 