lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gmünd, Carinthia

message: There are two Gmünds.  Judging by the links, this one is supposed to be about the town in Lower Austria.  There is a long article on it in the German wikipedia.
Inge-Lyubov 22:30, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation comment

message: Like the previous commenter, I discovered the hard way that many of the links here (the Gmünd article as was) were mislinks intended for one of the other Gmünds. My estimate is that about 30% were definite mislinks and another 20% were too ambiguous to determine. That in itself is a damning indictment of sloppy editing, and a good lesson as to why inappropriate use of primary disambiguation is a bad thing.
Unlike the previous commenter, I've done something about it (I guess 5 years too late is not too late). I've moved this page to Gmünd, Carinthia. I've been through all the links and where I could I have correctly disambiguated them. Where they were too ambiguous to be sure, I've left them pointing at Gmünd, which is now a dab page, on the grounds that this is the lesser of two evils when compared to risking incorrect disambiguation. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 21:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguated
Talk:Kimberley Walsh

message: It seems like a pretty typical article about a current pop singer to me.  Are there factual inaccuracies in it? What, specifically, do you object to? -FisherQueen 19:06, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What's wrong with it?

message: I think this qualifies as fair use. Please discuss here if you have anything to add. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 01:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use of [[:Image:GirlsAloud_Kimberley.jpg]] 

message: In fact  would also have been appropriate, but I thought I'd keep the boxes to a minimum.  The English needs overhauling, and the organisation is peculiar (one section called "Biography" and another – near the end – called "Personal life"?). --Mel Etitis  (Talk) 11:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 
Talk:Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan

message: is there anything all that notable about this firm?--Alhutch 22:38, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know--there are no references, and passages that are original research. 99.149.84.135 (talk) 22:19, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Quinn Emanuel is pretty well known, and the fact that they are adverse to banks is pretty unusual.  But the tone and neutrality of the article needs some serious cleanup!  Verkhovensky (talk) 02:07, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: This page does not have a neutral point of view. Needs revision. I will rewrite it to discuss encyclopedic facts versus opinions & include outside sources. --Snowy213 (talk) 22:27, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Needs revision. Will contribute.Nimaneems (talk) 23:11, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hang on for speedy deletion 
Talk:Michael Geist

message: Done and done. The photo is from Michael's profile page on the uOttawa website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cfish039 (talk • contribs) 10:31, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo 

message: Michale Geist won the the EFF Pioneer award. I'm not sure on how to add it with a source, here it is: http://www.eff.org/press/archives/2008/02/21 User:Vanisheduser12a67 (talk) 22:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Electronic Frontier Foundation Award

message: michaelgeist.ca is now redirecting to a parked page for "Lifelong E-mail" - I guess someone swiped the domain out from under him.  Anyone know what his new home is?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.15.196.195 (talk) 15:01, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Official Website Down?

message: This area was in need of an update, especially as seeing his extensive involvement in various boards. I've added a list of his current board work with internal links and external links for verification. Popartblue (talk) 01:44, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography

message: Michael Geist maintains several websites, I have added these in. Not sure how frequently he updates them, some may be stale. Popartblue (talk) 01:48, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Activities

message: I have introduced two new sections on these issues because, in addition to the mention in the discussion above, these are areas where currently Michael Geist has focused much of his writings. They are more recent, up-to-date develops that should be noted and expanded on due to their relevance in his work.  Copperserpentine (talk) 20:48, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bill C-32 and Bill C-11, Usage Based Billing
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Usability/Main Page/Draft/Vote6I

message: #Very nice, We love it!  Wikipedia community is very well done and we're very influenced by how that is served up. hydnjo talk 02:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Draft I.0

message: ::But Today's Featured Picture only appears on weekends rather than 7 days per week 22:33, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User_talk:Kevin_baas/main_page_proposal|Draft I.2 (revision)]]
Talk:Pet Sematary Two

message: "An undead Clyde then arrives, his entire face mutilated, and demands to fight Jeff again."
How is it possible that Clyde is undead? He was never buried on the "Sematary". Who would have wished him back anyway?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harald4244 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undead Clyde
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Usability/Main Page/Draft/Vote6G

message: #I like how the search is more prominent at the top. This should be a feature in all of the new Main Pages. -Travis 20:55, 21 January 2006 (UTC)

message: # Oppose.  To bright and incoherent.  Tacky.  Kevin Baastalk 00:26, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose
Talk:Vasile Stati

message: I seriously have doubts about believing that there was "Moldovenism" before USSR theory. AFAIK, in early 19th century even the Moldavians that were against a union with Wallachia accepted a common "Romanian" identity of the Moldavians and Wallachians. bogdan 22:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, the theory of Moldovan language and Moldovan people belongs to Joseph Stalin (http://www.revista22.ro/html/index.php?art=589&nr=2003-09-08 - Ce este limba moldoveneasca?; http://www.contrafort.md/2003/105-106/570_8.html ; Paul Goma - Basarabia: http://www.tiuk.reea.net/10/basarabia2.html ; http://www.gid-romania.com/IndexSectionst.asp?SectionID=34&SID=83 - '4 noiembrie 1940')  Adriatikus 23:09, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moldovenism

message: Why was deleted the section about the Russian origins of Vasile Stati? I mean this here: "His mother was Russian.Article from Moldova-Suverana: Nicolae Dabija - "Rusoaicele (2)"" See here. The comment was not racist (is the term "Russian" a racist one? Is it denigratory??). It isn't also an OR, because it IS supported by the source, see here what the text says: "Vasile Stati s-a nascut dintr-o mama rusoaica si un tata moldovean." So, I think, the issue is clear. --Olahus (talk) 10:26, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In the way the information appears in the article, that is certainly racist.Xasha (talk) 10:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Be more precise: what exactly is racist in the article? Olahus (talk) 11:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ethnicity of one's parents are usually of little importance and are normally included into a "early life" section way down below. Adding it into the lead like that is certainly inappropriate, made doubly so by the next sentence. Besides, you're using that lovely article by Dabija again. --Illythr (talk) 21:32, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, who are Constantin Staris and Ion Berlinski? Since their mums are not the embodiment of evil in this world, I take it, they are somewhat less evil themselves? --Illythr (talk) 21:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

text: BTW2: the Polish version is more neutral than this one, much more so than the Romanian one, where guess who had happily added the guy to the category "Russians", based on what seems to be personal preference (or dislike?). Perhaps a Polish speaker can grab some of the data from the better article and bring it over here... --Illythr (talk) 22:08, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: His Russian origins
Talk:Geneviève Sorya

message: Sorya article is pretty thin and only moderately, at best, notable. Can and should be merged with that of her far more famous daughter, actress :Anouk Aimée. Quis separabit? 16:32, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with [[:Anouk Aimée]]
Talk:Bounce music

message: Man, the N.O. has been through so much wit Katrina and all the other shit people goin through. Bounce music has really brought back some memories for most people. When people evacuated they took they cd's cause ain't nothin like new orleans muzik. For the people that got rescued, they didn't have no music to listen to in their new homes. That drove me crazy and I'm sure it drove others crazy too. But when u finally go back to tha city or get it from another new orleanian, u here that beat and start dancin'. It's hard to listen to bounce and not move your leg or shake ya ass. Bounce is tha shit and nobody knows about it. That's a symbol of new orleans. A DJ is another way of gettin together and have fun as people in New Orleans. It brings people together and they have fun. People miss gettin on top of the cars and bust out dancin. We wouldn't be the same if we had a party there was no bounce. No rock tha canoe, drop and gimme 50, faster, buckle ya knees, drop the hulla hoop, nolia clap, bounce it biggity bounce it, all that good shit!!!!! Man New Orleans could do that shit infront some people in other states and blow they minds. Bounce Muzik is fun and a beast. It's tha shit my nigga!!!!!!    9th Ward Souljarette
:What's your favorite artists down in New Orleans?--212.18.244.105 13:49, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Orleans Bounce Muzik 
Template talk:User WikiProject Ice Hockey

message: Just made it look more like the user categories.
Made the image smaller, so that they are the same size. And changed the colors to make it look better.
If you wanna see how it fits in better, just look at my user page.marcus1060 (My talk) 23:13, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

message: What about updating this userbox to make it more appealing? Out with the old, in with new. Here's my proposal.


	This user is a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey.


User
 08:35, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New look 

message: Could the following be added to the template. -- WOSlinker (talk) 11:58, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - Rjd0060 (talk) 15:37, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  add cat 

message: Is it ok if we change the image to our WP logo? --> -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24 review me 07:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image on ubx
Talk:Wigtown Burghs (UK Parliament constituency)

message: * This article and the one about Wigtown Burghs are about the same constituency. The one I did for Wigtown has more details than the one previously done for Wigtown Burghs. The only point of disagreement is which county New Galloway was in. I say Kirkcudbrightshire, the [reviously existing article says Wigtownshire. I believe I am correct on this point.
See http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/sct/KKD/
 --Gary J 23:18, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I imagine New Galloway may have been within two counties, changing county circa 1890. And I am not sure what basis has been used for the allocation of burghs to counties in District of burghs. Laurel Bush 12:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Galloway's county 

message: I'll unlink the one we currently have linked as he would have only been 18 at the time of the election in 1880. Possibly this should be the father of Gilbert McMicking (British politician) --Cavrdg (talk) 19:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gilbert McMicking
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Computer science

message: Please see proposal at: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Make Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer science/Manual of style into Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Computer science.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  13:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer science/Manual of style]] into [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Computer science]] 

message: , in the RfC about making this a guideline, supported but with this quibble: 
Any suggestions for replacements (or improving the example articles )? Didn't want to just leave this indefinitely hanging from the RfC, in which pretty much everything else was resolved.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  23:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the ping. I can't put the improvement of these articles high on my priority list, but hopefully many of them will be naturally improved over time by volunteers. Dining philosophers problem seems to use C++ rather than pseudocode and I'm not sure how great its sourcing is (when sources are given, like Chandry and Misra, I'm not sure due weight is followed). Halting problem has some justified tags relating to modern citation expectations—I think many computer science articles suffer from lack of inline citations. I'm struggling to find articles to suggest in their place, however. — Bilorv (talk) 15:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better examples? 

message: Please discuss at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Titles_of_works#Software_titles. fgnievinski (talk) 14:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting of software titles 

message: B-tree, Splay tree, Red–black tree, AVL tree
All of these show different ordering, formatting, and titles for the space/time complexity section of their infoboxes. Should there be a decided upon style for them? I personally like a "Complexities in Big O" header before having time and space sections. It's not helpful to go between articles quickly to see their differences and be met with different boldness, italics, and ordering. 
I see now that the two infoboxes are related, only that one is the shows the amortized complexities. I believe they should be changed so that the ordering is not different. Fuser55 (talk) 04:27, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uniform style for time/space complexity in infoboxes
Talk:Star Wreck

message: The special effects in Pirkinning are really quite remarkable -- I think really on the whole as good as anything I've ever seen in a big-budget sci-fi film. 
All the more amazing when you consider that this is an almost-no-budget sci-fi film, with for example the CGI effects computer "render farm" being located in the producer's kitchen.  -- Writtenonsand 23:19, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've just reverted, for the second time, an unregistered user changing the first week's download count from 600,000 to 700,000.  I've no idea which figure is closer to the actual truth, but the only verifiable source I know of, , gives a figure just under 600,000.  If someone has a source for the 700,000 figure, please tell me.  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 15:44, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I found one: .  I'll revert the article back to 700,000 with citations.  —Ilmari Karonen (talk) 15:51, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Downloads during first week 

message: Hopefully Im doing this right. If not please delete.
The link to the older versions of the series http://www.starwreck.com/legacy points to a page packed with multiple viruses. Either the link is false or their site has been compromised. Deleted the link so no one else is at risk.
Omega2064 (talk) 04:00, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virused Link?
Talk:WINW

message: WINW is now listed in CDBS as "DWINW", meaning that the call sign has been deleted.  Also, the license has been canceled.  There is also an FCC inquiry from January (PDF) indicating that WINW was silent, but the station never reported as such even after the inquiry — in which the FCC warned of "adverse actions jeopardizing both the station's license and call letters," i.e. license revocation.  (The station was silenced back in September 2010 due to theft of copper cables; I don't know if this has been a continuous silence.)  This obviously calls for an update, but there's yet to be any indication of any attempt to keep WINW alive — or if it is gone forever (and as a class D license on the WWKB/KOKC clear channel, — not to mention just a mere 21 miles from WJMP, the other 1520 class D in that region — that means forever), so I'm in a bit of a rut here.  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:34, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please be aware that http://www.ohiomediawatch.wordpress.com/ (formerly http://www.ohiomedia.blogspot.com/) – otherwise known as "Ohio Media Watch" ("OMW") – is an anonymous blog with no apparent editorial oversight and therefore does not qualify as a reliable source per WP:SELFPUBLISH.  Relevant discussions include Talk:WMMS#Reliable_sources, User_talk:Levdr1lp#Ohio_Media_Watch, and Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_135#Ohio_Media_Watch.  Levdr1lp / talk 09:13, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  WINW deleted; may be defunct?
Talk:Raymond Lewenthal

message: Slonimsky says he was born 29 August 1926.  I prefer to believe him, as he always bases his dates on birth certificates.  If there is a more compelling argument for 1923 than the current linked article, I'd be happy to consider it.  JackofOz 23:24, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  JackofOz 23:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Birth

message: IMDB has no knowledge of his involvement in films as a child actor.  Does anyone have any information on this?  JackofOz 02:07, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks again. JackofOz 23:30, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Hollywood Career

message: This seems to be plagiarized from [], given in the link in the main article. Hmmm.
: I agree. That page is copyright, U. of Maryland and asserts a last revision of 2003. The apparently offending material was added 28 January 2006 by an anon user from 67.161.47.7, so it looks like we're the problem, not them. I see no choice but to apply WP:CP and revert. Looks like most of the non-infringing work was formating, fixing, and categorization, so it shouldn't be a killer loss. Ick. I'll revert it tomorrow evenening (about 24 hours from now) unless someone else does it first. --studerby 02:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarized?

message: I think the mention of his child acting is overstated, considering that there is no record of even the tiniest of parts in IMDb, in other words he is not listed in IMDb. I studied privately with him for several months btw.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Encyclopedant (talk • contribs) 16:58, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  child actor
Talk:Champion (band)

message: did they not have an early release on Phyte records?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.191.22.250 (talk) 02:04, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Per Wikipedia's notability requirements, Champion meets the criteria of requirement #7, being one of, if not the mode noted straight edge hardcore band of the '00s.  Also, per requirement #5, they released multiple records on the Bridge9 record label, one of the most important and active record hardcore record labels.AndyMcKay 22:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Phil Graham

message: The reason I edited it as I did was to make it more clinically objective; many of the terms and phrases that had been used to describe his condition & treatment were not. Michael David 23:26, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mental illness

message: Whatever happened to Robin Webb?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.72.159.156 (talk) 23:44, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Robin Webb
Talk:Smoking Car Productions

message: I restored this article after reviewing the previous VfD and finding that the company has been mentioned in multiple media articles, satisfying the criteria for inclusion of company information. Further, while one of the voters noted that the article was (or may have?) been written by a company member, the article appears to be factually correct and not an example of self-promotion (it's not hyping the company). I welcome further discussion here. --Zippy 23:28, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To clarify about external media mentions, I believe Newsweek or a similar stature magazine is one of the media outlets that did an article on Smoking Car. I have not yet found a link for this one. --Zippy 23:39, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:User browser:Microsoft Internet Explorer

message: I have removed the IE icon, since fair use images are not permitted on user pages (and by extension, user boxes). — TheKMantalk 23:29, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And I have done it, again, today. My apologies to the editor who placed it there, but Logos cannot be placed in Userboxes. Ryulong 21:32, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: IE icon and fair use
Talk:Joe Spinell

message: This article was a copyvio lifted from  so I have reverted the article back to the last non-copyvio version. Sarah Ewart 23:36, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Gnosticism/New heading layout

message: Welcome to the new gnosticism layout - please post any extensive revisions below.  I'm working to get the page to a basic level of completion over the next few days (if anyone wants to help with this, that'd be great), after which I think it would be best if time was given to review the text, add, alter and edit; though I'm doing my best to remain NPOV, I'm aware that I'm not infallible, and my own knowledge doesn't cover everything so please contribute anything useful.  
I think the benefit of getting the article finished prior to transferring it to the main page is to retain a cohesiveness to the article that the current one lacks and which allows an over-emphasis on aspects of gnosticism (such as conceptions of materiality) which themselves represent only a small part of the overall movement.  I hope to also show a more historical, less constrictive approach to gnosticism, showing its development out of Plato and Aristotle, and on into Valentinianism and a partial extent of influence on Catharism.  
Anyway, hope you all like it so far - all comments are welcome. Visual Error 23:36, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New article
Talk:Opus clavicembalisticum

message: The citation of the letter in the "Composition" section lacks its reference. I found this article contains exactly the same phrases, but is this the source? Or is it taken from another material? --Aotake 03:21, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation of the letter 

message: I gather, from "Sorabji: A Critical Celebration", that his phrasing (in correspondence etc) was different at different times (sometimes absolute but only sometimes) but that- at minimum- he always reserved the right that he be asked before an intended performance and that if he said no, that wish be respected (a right British law gave him for his published works. He did, however, I gather(??) wink at a small number of performances of his works that he was made aware of between 1936 and before 1976, as noted, including a performance of one of his earliest published works, In the Hothouse (#1 of 2 Piano Pieces published 1921) in 1946, e.g.) Schissel | Sound the Note! 18:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ban 

message: I find two issues with the lede second paragraph. First, it doesn't add much to what has been said in the first paragraph: the work is known (renowned? notorious?) for its massive length, complexity, and difficulty; can't that be said in a single paragraph? Second, and worse, the second paragraph sounds self-contradictory, as written: the most technically demanding solo piano work [...] although some [other] works [...] were more difficult still. So, which is it? The most difficult or not. (The risks one runs using superlatives.) Shouldn't that be cleaned up? jmsofia (talk) 21:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede repetitive and confusing