Template talk:WikiProject Pakistan

message: Guys, can you add a place in this template for WikiProject Pakistani Cities? We really need to have a place for that workgroup as we can then categorise all Pakistani cities under the authorisation of this task force. Have a look at this page for example: Talk:Mumbai...in the WP India template, it lists in sub-headlines of who else mantains the article i.e this article maintained by the Indian cities workgroup and so on....I want a similar one for the Pakistani cities workgroup too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teckgeek (talk • contribs) 10:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Pakistani cities

message: This template appears in many pages with multiple WikiProjects. Can any editor edit the template to implement the "nesting=yes" parameter so that it can be used in the composite template. — Ambuj Saxena (☎) 10:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you give some examples/links? Szhaider 15:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nesting condition 

message: This is the only way for the collaborative effort of WP Pakistan and WP India to create WP Punjab can help. On User talk:Nobleeagle, Nichalp has explained this to me. If WP Pakistan does not want to comply then I might as well stuff the idea of WP Punjab and instead create WP Punjab (India) only.  — Nobleeagle  [TALK] [C] 06:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Frankly, I couldn't really get your point. I say you can put a separate banner for WikiProject Punjab (which covers Punjab region divided among two countries) on Punjab related Pakistani articles. Szhaider 07:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, it seems a bit of misunderstanding and bad blood has created an issue when there really wasn't one. The fact is that Punjab split into seperate entities in 1947. So for post-1947 articles, the  template just says that "This article is supported by the Punjab workgroup" while for pages pre-1947  is used.  doesn't support that option through your reverts, so you are saying that  will have to be used on post-1947 Pakistan-related articles.  — Nobleeagle  [TALK] [C] 07:16, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Only if you want to use . Right now, I am not as much interested in a child project when parent project is anything but complete. In my opinion,  (which apparntly needs to be created) could be more appropriate with that Punjab Task-force addition in it. I want to put all of my focus on repairing and completeing WikiProject Pakistan pages (not the articles which it covers). After that, I will discuss (if not banned) with other members of the project about proposals of expansion of the project. I have rejected some proposals from Pakistani editors because I thought they were not practical right now. Thanks to them, those editors understood my point and actually helped me. Szhaider 07:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punjab 

message: How about adding B - class criteria list in the template, like many other projects? It will certainly lead newbies that what an article is lacking. --SMS  Talk 09:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done. Check for updates. Arun Reginald (talk · contribs) 01:23, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  B - class criteria 

message: Please replace the line Comments</div> with the following:Comments. That is, remove the stray div end tag. Thanks. —Ms2ger (talk) 20:32, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: . — Huntster (t • @ • c) 09:45, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Code error 

message: * Not sure I agree with protecting this template; was it the subject of vandalism?
* At any rate, there is something wrong with its syntax. Look at my three most recent edits to Talk:Roma people.  This template breaks the  template when it is nested within. It only  displays correctly if this template is the last WikiProject template in the list. Ling.Nut (talk—WP:3IAR) 09:54, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I seem to have found a solution. Please replace the page with the contents of . —Ms2ger (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  template is broken somehow 

message: Please replace the page with the contents of , per Template talk:WikiProjectBannerShell#New_implementation_of_WikiProject_banners. Thanks. —Ms2ger (talk) 15:47, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I also made a small change to make sure no row is created for the collapsible table if there's nothing to put there. —Ms2ger (talk) 20:09, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It Is Me Here t / c 23:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

text: Thank you. —Ms2ger (talk) 12:17, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New implementation of nested banners 

message: I've put a new version of this template in the /sandbox using the meta-template . Are they any comments about using it? Are there any other features which should be incorporated? One thing I'm not sure about is the B-class checklist, because the current one use a non-standard one. Would there be any problem about using the standard 6-point checklist (see WP:BCLASS)? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:03, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . I've implemented the standard 6-point checklist. However this will have the effect of demoting most of the B-class articles to C-class. Please let me know if you want this changed. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 10:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: It seems that only one taskforce can be added per article. That is very inflexible. See Talk:October 2009 Lahore attacks. __meco (talk) 18:28, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is a weakness of this template. Perhaps we could move to using  and  rather than the current |H|M ? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than one taskforce 

message: Can someone please unlock this article?  It keeps displaying C quality for every article. Its irritating and misleading. NarSakSasLee (talk) 19:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The template is currently using a B-class checklist (check the documentation) so articles need to be assessed to be classified as B-class. This can be removed if the WikiProject does not want it. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:40, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Even with the B class criterea filled out it still displays C grade. Please remove the criteria, its incredibly irritating. NarSakSasLee (talk) 03:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, most other WikiProjects don't have a B-criteria checklist anyway, and articles are rated C only if specified. This template should follow the same procedure. Besides, there are some articles which are B-class yet they are listed as C because someone hasn't bothered to fill the checklist. This parameter is inaccurate Mar4d (talk) 02:23, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit Locked/Unlock

message: Please add the following:       |MAIN_CAT            = WikiProject Pakistan articles
under the script:               |PORTAL              = Pakistan
so as to categorise all articles into :Category:WikiProject Pakistan articles. Thanks! Mar4d (talk) 12:25, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: . Please note that it will take a while for :Category:WikiProject Pakistan articles to automatically be fully populated due to the cache of the Wikipedia servers. Cheers. Zzyzx11 (talk) 17:00, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit

message: Some minor changes have been made at Template:WP Pakistan/Sandbox, including additional parameters as well as change of icons. It is requested if the changes could be transported from the sandbox page to this template. Thanks, Mar4d (talk) 03:28, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Closedmouth (talk) 05:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: The instructions don't inform what parameters to use for adding an article to the various sub-projects. Also, the X parm doesn't seem to be working, see Talk:Mangla __meco (talk) 14:03, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This functionality was removed last year (see #New request above) but apparently the documentation wasn't updated. I will ask  if he/she can do it. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:53, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the instructions for adding article to a sub-project. Also updated the categories for the X variable (previous categories were deleted) but if consensus is not to add the X parameter back, instructions for that can be removed. --SMS  Talk 20:33, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have given my comments regarding this here. Thanks, Mar4d (talk) 05:41, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instructions missing 

message: Please replace it by the SVG, for deleting the duplicate.--Antemister (talk) 16:49, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Antemister You should place  at the top of this request so an admin/template editor can look at this request. -- SMS  Talk 17:24, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I usually edit only the german WP and do know few about such procedures here.--Antemister (talk) 17:41, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  /* Flag of Sindh Province.png */ + 

message: Please transport the new changes (line 136/7 ) made at :Template:WikiProject Pakistan/sandbox to the main template.   samee  converse  16:18, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: It appears that you have made changes to a version of the sandbox from four years ago, one that has not been kept up to date with the live template. This means that  to the live template will be undone if the sandbox is copied live; so please copy the live template to the sandbox, then make your changes there. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:14, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New parameters 

message: I cannot unambiguosly state my request as I have little experience with templates, but I have noticed that there are parameters such as listas for which no explanation has been given, photo-needed and needed-photo (duplicate params, which to use), and other parameter oddities. Could someone fix this? Thanks. RealKnockout (talk) 08:11, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done:  is usually not required for edits to the documentation or categories of templates using a documentation subpage. Use the 'edit' link at the top of the green "Template documentation" box to edit the documentation subpage. They are explained:  under Template:WikiProject Pakistan#Optional parameters;  under Template:WikiProject Pakistan#Aliases, whilst  is not mentioned in the documentation because it is not valid. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 15:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 25 July 2021 

message: Can someone kindly copy this revision of the sandbox to the main template? Thanks. RealKnockout (talk) 13:36, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: Passing class to  is incorrect. Compare to Template:WikiProject Germany and Template:WikiProject United States. —⁠andrybak (talk) 12:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  My apologies, sorry for the screw-up, I am not very experienced with templates. I believe I have fixed the mistake; can you kindly copy this revision instead? Thanks. RealKnockout (talk) 18:47, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 21 September 2021 

message: Change :File:Flag of Balochistan, PK.gif to :File:Flag of Balochistan.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:42, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . P.I. Ellsworth - ed. put'r there 02:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 6 February 2022 

message: Can someone kindly copy this revision of the sandbox to the main template? It enables class categories for WikiProject Pakistani politics. Thanks. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 07:53, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

text: You have a few more categories to create — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:35, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:40, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 31 March 2023