lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kristian Digby

message: If one does a Google search for "Escape to the Country", one finds the option of clicking on a link that says "People also ask  - which presenter died from escape to the country". The answer given is Kristian Digby. Does this mean that Kristian Digby was ever on the programme called Escape to the Country?Vorbee (talk) 20:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I don't think so. They're just combining To Buy and Escape into one broad TV property grouping I suspect. GedUK  09:24, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Escape to the Country
Talk:Chickenfeed (novel)

message: Looking at chickenfeed -"chicken feed" it's clear that the main use is the same as "chicken feed", rightly or wrongly. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:42, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative spelling for poultry feed, or trivial items
Talk:Neo-conceptual art

message: This article is dismally lacking in description, definition, and sources. Bus stop 15:36, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I suggest to merge this article with Conceptual Art since the term seems to be mainly a marketing term, and not an art-historic one.
--DDdW (talk) 19:32, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not a problem in itself. The only issue is whether it is a notable term or not. There are enough references to be found to indicate that it is. See Google, Google Books, and Google Scholar. The problem with the article at the moment is that the references for a lot of the content (which was taken, with attribution, from Conceptual art) do not mention "neo-conceptual" art. Another issue is that the term is often used interchangeably with "conceptual art", so that it may be best to deal with the term in Conceptual art, showing how it can be used for a later phase, but that phase is also often referred to just as "conceptual art" along with the earlier period of the genre. Ty 10:59, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

text: I agree, the term neo-conceptual hasn't enough credit on academic publications and specialized press to be considered as a practice or a mouvement/tendency of its own. The sporadic use of the expression «neo-conceptual» doesn't necessarily implies it has been widely used by artists, historians or critics and reached any form of consensus. Alpha Logger (talk) 16:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: merge with conceptual art?
Talk:Dampening

message: I believe that it is more proper to use the term damping for this musical term as well as in physics. For example the felt pads in a piano are called dampers, not dampeners.  A quick google search reveals that "right-hand damping" occurs with "guitar" far more than "right hand dampening".  I'll edit to not that both can be used, but I actually think that the title should be changed, as well as the usage throughout the article.  But I'm not feeling that bold at the moment.Ccrrccrr 15:38, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cut (novel)

message: I haven't read this book in a while; can we put down some events that happened in the book? Jennifer (talk) 13:59, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

message: I was Snail Mail No More not Cut! I was going to make this article self-mutilation. I am 9-12, but I got the 2005 edition of this book from Constantine Maroulis's fandom and it is just not the same as Joseph Gordon-Levitt which I have also read. O, G.I. Joe: Retaliation, finally got P.S. Longer Letter Later from 1997 or 1998, so T*Witches! Anyway, got to go work on my Joseph Gordon-Levitt fan biography now. Talk to you later. Callie refused to clap at applause. CallieMacPherson (talk) 13:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  9-12 

message: Listed as a setting of the novel is Sea Pines Resort. Thus is untrue. The author stated herself that Sea Pines was not a real place within an FAQ. And it is stated in the book that Sea Pines was not near the sea, as Sea Pines Resort is.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.137.79.70 (talk) 06:48, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sea pines?
Talk:Dairy Queen (novel)

message: ... "This AMAZING novel"... how unbiased... 67.81.171.246 (talk) 22:53, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Sępólno Krajeńskie

message: The German Wikipedia for Zempelburg states the population as 16,000. According to citypopulation.de, there was a Census in 2002 and 2011. The information is cited as found on https://www.gmina-sepolno.pl/. I do not read Polish. It would be great if someone could update the population information from the Census. TheTypingKat (talk) 03:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population Data 

message: https://wp-de.wikideck.com/Landkreis_Zempelburg 
http://territorial.de/dawp/zempelbg/landkrs.htm
TheTypingKat (talk) 20:11, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literature on Sepolno
Talk:NSO

message: ----
Per WP:MOSDAB, this disambiguation page is only for entries that may be referred to at least occasionally as "NSO".  It's not for listing any National Symphony Orchestra, if that orchestra is never referred to as simply NSO.  For instance, National Symphony Orchestra (Peru) mentions only that it's referred to as "OSN", never "NSO", so it, along with others, may need to be removed.  --Interiot 15:45, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:LISA (organization)

message: The SAGE logo is very out of date, the Octothorpe isn't even used now.  The new SAGE logo probably should be used, however I'm not sure of its copyright.  JSBillings 15:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo usage 

message: It seems that SAGE-WISE has disappeared. I can't find any references to it since 2004. Unless anyone knows / can find better the link should probably be removed. Rthorton 16:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAGE-WISE 

message: It seems like cSAGE Certification is no longer active. Please confirm.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mor.sela (talk • contribs) 05:12, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cSAGE Certification 

message: SAGE has become LISA. Shouldn't this article (and the USENIX one) be corrected?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Furrfu (talk • contribs) 06:47, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: LISA

message: To the extent there is information available in verifiable third-party sources, this article really needs a better treatment of the SAGE separation dispute, how it led to the formation of LOPSA, and the resulting lawsuit.  I believe the settlement of the lawsuit bound the parties not to discuss the terms, but it should be possible to find more information about it than what is written here.  (I know the basic question at issue in the lawsuit was whether Usenix was a party to the contractual obligations entered into by the people who were forming new-SAGE with the service bureau which was providing management services for the new organization, but I don't have any verifiable sources for this.)  121a0012 (talk) 03:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation dispute 

message: This article was proposed for deletion by User:AusLondonder on 9 Aug 2015.  It was deprodded by User:Mark viking because "This SIG has been around for many years and basic facts are are verifiable; redirect to USENIX would be an obvious alternative to deletion."  Whilst I would agree that the basic facts may be verifiable I think the issue at stake is notability rather than verifiability of facts.  I can't find substantial coverage of this organization anywhere (as yet), so any help in this area would be appreciated.  Djonesuk (talk) 14:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD 
Talk:New Rights Party

message: This article is essentially a defense of the party's beliefs and activities, not an unbiased account.  It ends just after the Rose Revolution of 2003.   Waverly57 15:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The correct name of this political party in English is "New Rightists Party" (as opposed to Leftists). An incorrect translation was used in English and spread into other languages, who believed the party's name had something to with rights, as in "human rights". When a mistake has gone uncorrected for too long, nobody dares correct it, and this party name is one example of that. 
8h3d0kg (talk) 09:46, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Party name
Talk:Neverball

message: I've undeleted this article, which was apparently speedy-deleted. A detailed article like this on a clearly complex piece of software should not be speedy-deleted, as that process is unlikely to result in proper review. This game is clearly notable. I've given it considerable space in my book, and it has been discussed in at least two other German language books, as a Google books search reveals, in addition to countless mentions on Linux websites, inclusion in package managers, part of TheOpenCD selection, etc. In terms of open source games, it doesn't get much more notable than this one.--Eloquence* 16:00, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. — Omegatron 22:57, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I don't know whether neverball supported the iPhone in the past, it does not currently support it however.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scot.mcpherson (talk • contribs) 16:24, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  iPhone Support 

message: * http://www.ign.com/articles/2004/04/15/neverball-121-released – small article
* http://toucharcade.com/2008/07/08/neverball-a-free-alternative-to-super-monkey-ball/ – small article
* http://www.insidemacgames.com/news/story.php?ArticleID=9434 – repackaged press release
* http://www.technologytell.com/apple/44387/control-mac-os-x-with-a-wii-balance-board-video/ – passing mention
* http://www.hardcoregamer.com/2012/07/06/recession-bundle-brings-freeware-and-paid-games-together-in-harmony/9648/ – passing mention
I found no significant coverage from secondary sources for this topic. Its major claim to fame is being a clone of Super Monkey Ball, so I think a redirect to that article's Legacy section for a mention would be the best option. czar ⨹ 18:18, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources and notability 

message: 9/22/2020. i just restored and updated the neverball page only to have it deleted seconds later. there may be some kind of bot that keeps deleting the page. i've undeleted my revision.
: Your changes have been reverted by two separate editors as your additions are virtually unreferenced. Please see WP:BRD --John B123 (talk) 20:41, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved your content to Draft:Neverball where you can work on it without interference. --John B123 (talk) 21:10, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  speedey deleted again 

message: Should there be a standalone Neverball article? Aleczdr (talk) 15:17, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should there be a Neverball article?
Talk:County island

message: As far as I can tell, the term "county island" is only ever used in Arizona. Primarily in only one county, Maricopa.
https://www.azcentral.com/picture-gallery/news/local/gilbert/2014/12/15/county-islands-in-chandler-gilbert-mesa-queen-creek-and-tempe/20458841/
https://askmichelleshelton.com/resources/buyer-resources/maricopa-county-island-what-is-it/
Not notable enough to be defined with its own article, possibly as part of Unincorporated community
Keith D. Tyler ¶ 05:08, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No notability
Talk:In the Country of Men

message: A chance to ask questions to improve this article! Hisham Matar will be talking about his novel In the Country of Men on the BBC radio programme World Book Club. You can submit a question or ask to be part of the audience by emailing worldbookclub@bbc.co.uk, by using the form on the World Book Club homepage, or by leaving a message on the World Book Club Facebook page. Recording is at 16:45 on Wednesday 24 August 2011, at BBC Bush House, London EdQuine (talk) 12:57, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hisham Matar on the BBC's World Book Club 
Talk:Ville Contemporaine

message: every one of corbusier's city designs had outlying suburbs meant for the wealthy. the poor and the middleclass would live in the towers. this article has obviously not been fact-checked, so I am going to ask for citations.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.64.114.170 (talk) 12:40, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wealthy people were not going to live in the skyscrapers 

message: I think this article should be marked as a stub! first of all. The Contemporary City for 3 million people has tons of images available in hard format. Recently published was Seeing Like A State: A new novel focused on the mapping and circulation through urban spaces, largely focusing on Le Corbusier's Contemporary city. link to follow to the novel http://mises.org/daily/5101  The Contemporary city's importance is very prominent in any studies done on urban planning and architecture. MIT Urban Studies has a great thesis here by Marybeth Shaw here http://mises.org/daily/5101 containing many images that may either be under no license or a University one, although I doubt MIT owns those images; they're common images of the city. Corbusier's work here is an essential topic for any student pursuing B arch. It's usually compared historically in essay papers, to the Huassmann boulevards (1853) cut through Paris and displayed a very purposeful notion toward authoritarianism in the various subtle modes of population control through urban planning similar to Le Corbusier theorized about and took an interest into solving the problems of urban congestion and paths of circulation through the urban. So please, possibly a contributor of the Le Corbusier article should touch this one up; an important part of Corbusier's experimentations with urban planning, as well as an important unrealized project of Paris's history  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.119.217.8 (talk) 16:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation would be helpful etc
Talk:Solidere

message: The cggl.org article is more or less a copy from the daily star article that was published in 2007, unfortunately the daily star archives its original articles after a while and requires a subscription to be able to access them, thus cggl.org's copy of the article seems to be the only one available online.
E.R.UT (talk) 00:03, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concerning the lawsuits
Talk:Urban Land Institute

message: Nothing about the history of the organization is pushing the destructive policies of urban renewal? 63.107.91.99 (talk) 19:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the basic image of text that states the name of the thinktank that replaces the infobox organization name parameter necessary? I don't think it's needed since  exists... Cattojazz (talk) 00:28, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox organization name
Talk:Venice Charter

message: Anything known about Germany's role in this Charter ? --House1630 (talk) 08:48, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "However, the document is now seen as outdated, representing Modernist views opposed to reconstruction."
As far as I know, the Venice Charter is still being discussed and applied around the world, so it is not outdated, it is just claimed as outdated by its detractors.
It is also not opposed to reconstruction in itself, it is opposed to hypothetical reconstruction, if anything.
I think in general this article would benefit from more substantiation. ICOMOS provides a lot of sources on conservation and explains the current interpretation quite well here:
"Discussion on the subject of reconstruction has been difficult, because reconstruction has often been considered as a taboo for heritage conservation. The Operational Guidelines of the World Heritage Convention also states that reconstruction would be justifiable only under “exceptional circumstances” (para.86 of the OG [2017]). Hence debates on reconstruction have taken place within a particular conception of authenticity. The main focus of the debates has been what aspects of heritage should be taken into consideration to assess the aspects and conditions of authenticity. Focus has traditionally been placed on the material aspects of heritage, while other aspects could be considered only if the information on such aspects was proven to have sufficient credibility. This broader approach has been accepted to analyze the authenticity on doctrinal and practical levels. However, when the social dimensions of heritage have been changed through immigration, conflict, and other social phenomena, more elaborate analysis seems necessary." source Llehsadam (talk) 20:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No source for outdated claim or opposition to reconstruction 

message: This page contains many links to pages that are not available to the public! Heiner Krellig (talk) 12:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  uncorrect links
Talk:Very special relativity

message: I refer to the very specail relativity. which is based on the neutrino interfere with quantum micro world,so it make every every thing messy and randomly move.My theory that it will change the whole system to b random.I wrote that around two years ago.The very specail relativity wrote
in feb.2007.I would like to fixed her that because I did not have access to physical reveiw letter.
(Shreef Dr Hamid Raad 16:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Timothy Noah (2nd nomination)

message: When the first AfD started, Timothy's first attention-grabbing headline was "Evicted From Wikipedia", which was followed by "Rescued by Wikipedia" when the AfD was SNOWed.  I keep reloading Slate.com, expecting a new Wikipedia headline to show up as the main story.  Any bets on what the headline might be?  "Twice Scorned"?  "Last month 'Notable', this month no more"?  --Interiot 16:11, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Context theory

message: *** (Anonymous passerby note) *** 
Rem actually said, "Bigness is no longer part of any urban tissue. Its subtext is fuck context."  So taking a quote out of context is not appropriate for this article, though the contextuality of it, ironically, is. 
68.55.204.173 (talk) 20:10, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does it come from Anthony Wilden works?
http://books.google.ca/books?hl=fr&lr=&id=FfoNAAAAQAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=Anthony+Wilden+context+theory.+&ots=pttuJ1Kfa_&sig=b-M9P0fh7Fexn-tCjjYgJNtDk9c
1 - go to 304. Postscript:context theory
2 - then go to 74 and read "The rule of extinction"
3 - read the aknowledgement at the beginning, on Thanh H. Vuong
I've worked with Tony since the first edition of 1972 "System and Stucture" when all started with Gregory Bateson "steps to an ecology of mind". The full fledged "Context theory" is on this Anthony Wilden 1988 "The Rules are no game".In 1986, I've publised in French Quebec "Relations internationales" an aricle tittled "Context theory and International relations. The outset of Indochina War".
- Thanh H. Vuong, “Théorie des contextes et relations internationales: départ de la première Guerre d’Indochine", dans Études Internationales, Vol. XVII, No. 3, p. 573, septembre 1986
http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~patrickj/EI1986.pdf 
Takima (talk) 14:28, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth of the Context Theory
Talk:Old Great Falls Historic District

message: I created this page, but when looking for the name I created it for I could not find any sources for it.  I cannot find any sources for the name suggested I change the page to "Old Great Falls Historic District".  I think this page should be deleted because there is no name for this neighborhood and it seems to be informal if it is its own neighborhood.  I think it makes sense to delete it further because since the two sections of it are included in other neighborhoods.
:Since there were several contributors, I suggest you use  instead, so that they have an opportunity to contest the deletion. CMummert · talk 16:58, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

message: *Great Falls (Passaic River)
*Old Great Falls Historic District
*Great Falls of Paterson-Garrett Mountain
*Garret Mountain Reservation
*National Register of Historic Places listings in Passaic County, New Jersey mentions S.U.M. in listing
*Paterson, New Jersey#Lambert Castle Museum
The above articles, whilst focusing on a different aspect of the Falls do cover alot of the same material and do refer to each other. Is it actually necessary? It certainly is confusing and starts getting circuitous. Is there some way they can be consoldated? The distinction between the falls and the mountain are clear, though there may be some jurisdictional differences regarding the what is included in the various municpal, state and national designations. Thoughts?Djflem (talk) 18:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge/consolidate/separate/disambiguate/link/address
Talk:Transition zone (Earth)

message: Citation of some standard references would be useful. DoctorTerrella (talk) 15:38, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

message: Specifically, what are "PP-" and "SS precursors" and "P to S conversions" Father-science (talk) 02:24, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical abbreviations need more description
Talk:Design code (United Kingdom)

message: This article seems quite UK-centered.  I am not sure whether there is an actual difference between a "Design Code" and a "Building Code".  In the US, the terms are used interchangeably.  I've added a "See also" to link to Building Code, but perhaps it would be best to merge the two articles? -- Panchobook (talk) 23:06, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Melbourne 2030

message: The PAC list has at least three mistakes:
*Ringwood
*Ringwood
*Ringwood
What's the source?
wcrosbie (talk), Melbourne, Australia 12:06, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Principal Activity Centres
Talk:Marketplace of ideas

message: This article claims that the marketplace of ideas metaphor can be found in Mill's On Liberty, though it notes that the phrase appears nowhere in Mill. However, I think that's doubtful and presented as original research. Mill doesn't say anything about market efficiency and free speech. Quite to the contrary, he's very concerned with a tyranny of the majority, which is what we would expect if we relied on the market mechanisms to weed out bad ideas. Anyway, the notion that the marketplace of ideas is in Mill is nowhere cited (though I'm sure that you could find scholars who make this claim). Here's someone who makes the contrary claim: Jill Gordon, "John Stuart Mill and the 'Marketplace of Ideas,' " Social Theory and Practice 23 (1997). So the idea that this is in Mill is at least controversial. It should be removed from the article. Were this an article about Mill, it may be worth mentioning the controversy. But it isn't, so we shouldn't.68.63.148.22 (talk) 13:00, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest you remove the text or rewrite it and see what happens. GeorgeLouis (talk) 00:36, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's correct that Mill does not use this phrase or even an argument that could be neatly summarized with this phrase. It's a popular misconception that he does. I've edited accordingly. Metamagician3000 (talk) 06:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mill and the marketplace of ideas? Doubtful
Talk:Mel King

message: The wording and general tone of this article appears to read like a public relations release for an individual. The article is comprised of peacock wording which appears to continually praise the subject and uses grandiose phrasing throughout. Although the article is factually sound, the general tone comes across as biased and unencyclopedic.(67.234.138.51 (talk) 18:00, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Cleaned up. jps (talk) 22:56, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV Dispute