Talk:List of railway companies

message: Just confused as to whether this page is supposed to be of contemporary or historic railway companies? The current German railway is not the Bundesbahn but has been Deutsche Bahn since about 1992. Also ideally the Belgian railway should be SNCB/NMBS to reflect both languages. -- Arwel 00:30 May 7, 2003 (UTC)
:In general I think lists of companies should include both current and past, because a) you don't have to edit every time a company goes under, and b) a reader looking for a company is going to have a hard time finding it in the list if he/she doesn't know that it disappeared or merged a couple years previously. Stan 01:04 May 7, 2003 (UTC)
::I disagree. This has the potential to make the list impossibly large: there are hundreds and hundreds of former railway companies in Great Britain and Ireland alone. We should confine the list to currently operating railways (though there is no reason why, at the end of a country's entry, there cannot be a link to the likes of "Railway history of Xland" where such articles exist). Compare the United States solution in this list. If a former railway company is mentioned in the Wikipedia it should be directly findable in any case. -- Picapica 10:06, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: === List of railway companies#South America and Central America ===
====List of railway companies#Uruguay====
 (State Railways Administration) This link no longer 
works & needs to be replaced.  --Peter Horn 19:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The link is operational again Peter Horn 17:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[List of railway companies]]

message: ====List of railway companies#Uruguay====
 (State Railways Administration) This link no longer 
works & needs to be replaced.  --Peter Horn 19:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The link is operational again Peter Horn 17:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[List of railway companies#South America and Central America]] 

message: (State Railways Administration) This link no longer 
works & needs to be replaced.  --Peter Horn 19:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The link is operational again Peter Horn 17:50, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[List of railway companies#Uruguay]]

message: Re:  This link "sucks" because it does not allow one to go back to List of railway companies 
Peter Horn 17:13, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[List of railway companies#Argentina]]

message: A discussion has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries/Lists of countries which could affect the inclusion criteria and title of this and other lists of countries.  Editors are invited to participate. Pfainuk talk 13:42, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Discussion

message: This article is entitled List of railway companies. But for at least two countries (Germany and Switzerland) it seems to have become rather a list of railway acronyms. The actual name of the company is relegated to brackets after the acronym, as if it were just a bit of helpful explanation rather than the thing that is supposed to be being listed. Why?.
To avoid misunderstanding, I have no objection to using abbreviations where that is the genuine name of the company. But most German and Swiss railway companies have perfectly good names.
Would anybody object to me trying to rectify this situation. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 20:06, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A list of railway companies, or a list of railway acronyms? 

message: We currently have all of the Class I RRs listed, and one Class III. Should we keep this list to just the Class I's (the largest), or add in the Class II and III's?  The latter choice would be a long list. I suggest keeping this listing just for Class I, and using the 'See also' template to link to other lists. Caseyjonz (talk) 01:55, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I added class 2 and 3 RRs. I think this is just all of them, we also have a link to a Wikipedia page that is all Class 1 RRs 23.176.176.249 (talk) 14:07, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I also added Class Two and Class Three railroads to the list, should we add all the railroads that are sourced out of the US? Such as CP and CN they both are in the US and Canada, what should we do about those railroads? TerrellAT (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: US Railways - Which companies should be included?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on List of railway companies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071023064759/http://news.yahoo.com:80/s/nm/20071020/wl_nm/afghan_conference_dc to http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071020/wl_nm/afghan_conference_dc
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050205193802/http://doellnitzbahn.de:80/index1024.html to http://www.doellnitzbahn.de/index1024.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130721105647/http://www.ferrosur.com.ar/ to http://www.ferrosur.com.ar
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:46, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why does the listing of railway unions preface the African section?  There is nothing comparable for the other continents.  Railway Unions worldwide may merit a comprehensive Wiki article, and indeed there already are standalone articles on such in several different countries. Casey (talk) 18:45, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Railway Unions" belongs elsewhere 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on List of railway companies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20010406063005/http://www.transnamib.com.na/transnamib_web/html/frame.htm to http://www.transnamib.com.na/transnamib_web/html/frame.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041014030136/http://railfeeding.nl/ to http://www.railfeeding.nl/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050511030918/http://www.railion.nl/ to http://www.railion.nl/
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130112131640/http://www.autoslaaptrein.nl/ to http://www.autoslaaptrein.nl/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120503014317/http://www.tbanet.com.ar/ to http://www.tbanet.com.ar/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070710193155/http://www.ugofe.com.ar/ to http://www.ugofe.com.ar/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120503014317/http://www.tbanet.com.ar/ to http://www.tbanet.com.ar/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100711113246/http://www.trenesdellitoral.com.ar/ to http://www.trenesdellitoral.com.ar/
*Added  tag to http://www.fenadesal.gob.sv/ventajas.php
*Added  tag to http://www.iafe.gov.ve/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Should we be writing Railway or Railroad and I’ve seen some that have (Made up) “Train Railway” and then under it “Train Railroad”. This also happened with saying “Company” after it. 
I also assume that these can be from the past or present seeing some railroads that don’t exist any more  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.176.176.249 (talk) 19:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labeling 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion