lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:1818

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:39, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Should his death be included? 146.200.180.251 (talk) 20:27, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obaki
Talk:1817

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:40, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:1816

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:40, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1815

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:40, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 06:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:1814

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:41, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1813

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:41, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1811

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:42, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: On X-mas eve, December 24., 1811, the two English warships, St. George and Defence were shipwrecked in very bad weather on the sandbanks outside the town of Thorsminde on the west coast of Jutland. 1.391 crew lost their lives with only 18 survivors. This catastrophe - comparable in loss of lives to Titanic - that took place almost within reach of the coast, made a tremendous impression in Denmark (despite the fact that admiral Nelson had destroyed the Danish fleet only 10 years before!) and influenced heavily on the decision to establish rescue stations on the coast of Jutland. Maybe this should be researched a bit and comments added to the year. --Sir48 04:19, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 07:01, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:1810

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:43, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 01:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:1809

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:43, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi BozMo - no objection to making each year consistent (as per 1850), but do not see why Years by County have to be merged into the year (eg 1809 in France) and the many hundreds of other years by country articles. A lot of us have spent substantial time ensuring we have Years by country articles (eg Ireland is very comprehensive) and these articles form a vital part of History by country. 
Support 1850 format, but not merging of Years by country articles which stand very much in their own right. Ardfern (talk) 14:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Opposed to merging all Years by Country into Year

message: Have had to restore 1809 in France as it had been merged befiore any discussion completed. If this goes on many hundreds of articles will be lost that are part of History by country. Ardfern (talk) 15:31, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1809

message: Hi Ardfern, we got a request on the helpchannel that the data was copied into 1809, and the page should be a redirect, and i didn't notice the merger was opposed, so sorry for that, the user requesting it in IRC is named IngerAlHaosului. Cheers. Mion (talk) 15:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes i took for granted that the discussion was followed, which wasn't, the 1809 page is also reset to 3 mar, to prevent double data. Cheers. Mion (talk) 15:58, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1809
Talk:1808

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:43, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It was the pre-last occultation of a planet by an other planet until now. There are no observation records. What does pre-last mean? -FZ 00:35, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  question about astronomical event 

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 06:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:1807

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:44, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 06:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:1806

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:44, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 06:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: also listed as having been born in 1805, on the wiki 1805 births page Oniscoid (talk) 09:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Napoleaon Coste 

message: Listed for January 1, 1806 was the entry "George Bush helps with the financial crisis of Russia." I can't find any source to substantiate this and it's unclear who is being referred to, so I've removed the entry. Noir~enwiki (talk) 19:43, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Bush?
Talk:1805

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:44, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 06:58, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 
Talk:1804

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:45, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 06:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:1803

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:45, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 06:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:1800

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 10:46, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1850#Format.  -Wikid77 01:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: Where are the births of the second half of this year?? De Jaren (talk) 14:43, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Births, section 2.2 

message: The pages for Leap Year and Century Leap Year say that 1800 was not a leap year.  This page says it was.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.200.93.68 (talk) 18:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leap Year? 

message: If the year is divisible by 200 but not by 400, then February has 9 days and there is 346 days in a year. 
 (a valid date) 
 (an invalid date)
So the day after  would be  rather than February10, 1800.
February 29th only occurs in leap years, where as February 10th through the 28th occurs every year unless if the year is divisible by 200 but not by 400. 
1800, 2200, 2600, 3000, 3400, 3800, 4200, 4600, 5000, 5400, and 5800 will have 9 days in February 
1700, 1900, 2100, 2300, 2500, 2700, 2900, 3100, 3300, 3500, 3700, 3900, 4100, 4300, 4500, 4700, 4900, 5100, 5300, 5500, 5700, and 5900 will have 28 days in February 
1600, 2000, 2400, 2800, 3200, 3600, 4000, 4400, 4800, 5200, 5600, and 6000 will have 29 days in February
So the day after February 9, 2200 will be March 1, 2200. --98.31.29.4 (talk) 16:10, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there any sources to prove this? Nigos (t@lk • Contribs) 02:05, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  9 days in February  

message: 1800 (MDCCC) was an exceptional common year starting on Wednesday of the Gregorian calendar and a leap year starting on Sunday of the Julian calendar, the 1800th year of the Common Era (CE) and Anno Domini (AD) designations, the 800th year of the 2nd millennium, the 100th and last year of the 18th century, and the 1st year of the 1800s decade. As of the start of 1800, the Gregorian calendar was 11 days ahead of the Julian calendar, which remained in localized use until 1923. 190.213.232.105 (talk) 05:17, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk 103.14.88.152 (talk) 06:51, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1800 

message: just curious. you state the year was "an exceptional common year" 70.31.165.30 (talk) 17:07, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. An exceptional common year is any year divisible by 100 (thus by 4), but not by 400. --NicoScribe (talk) 21:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  why exceptional?
Talk:Matra Alice

message: The article claims that the Alice was more successful than the original MC-10. This article and this article both suggest otherwise.
This one seems to imply that it was favoured by its inclusion in the government programme, but I'm not sure how much of a success that made it.
Fourohfour 14:29, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Success? 
Talk:1799

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:22, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: January 9 – British Prime Minister William Pitt the Younger introduces an income tax of two shillings to the pound, to raise funds for Great Britain's war effort in the Napoleonic Wars.
I find this suspect, or at least in severe need of clarification. Napoleon did not come into power until Fall 1799, and the Napoleonic Wars themselves did not begin until 1803, at which time William Pitt the Younger was not Prime Minister. This tax is not mentioned at all in the latter's page during his first premiership. There is no citation provided, can someone show one? I'm not saying this didn't happen, but at least from my understanding of the time period it seems at least highly reductive. If this tax was specifically created to fund war efforts against France, and was in fact instituted 9 Jan 1799, then at the time it was raised to  aid in the War of the Second Coalition, which is not considered part of the Napoleonic Wars, because Napoleon had not become Consul yet. I just feel this probably should be reworded.
--129.7.0.24 (talk) 22:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Napoleonic Wars
Talk:1798

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:23, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1797

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:23, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1796

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:24, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1795

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:25, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1794

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:25, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1793

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:26, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ::[ See: Talk:1750#Format. -Wikid77 14:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format
Talk:1792

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:27, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should there be, or is there a reason for there not being, a date for the death of King Lois the XVI of France?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.191.180.87 (talk) 07:37, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louis XVI's Death
Talk:1791

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:28, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1790

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:29, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1789

message: : [See: Talk:1780#Images.  -Wikid77 01:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: WE CANT PUT A NOTE IN THE BEGINNING OF EVERY YEAR THAT HAD A NOTABLE HISTORIC EVENT.
IF WE DID SO WE WOULD HAVE TO ADD A NOTE IN 1939,BECAUSE OF THE BEGGINING OF WWII.
OR 1776 FOR THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE OF THE UNITED STATES.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.5.80.126 (talk) 17:08, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FRENCH REVOLUTION MENCION JUST REMOVED
Talk:1788

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:30, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1780#Images.  -Wikid77 12:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: hi this wikipedia is sweat and easy to use and really gives alot of information
                                                    71.241.16.11 23:27, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  this is cool 

message: January 29 Alf was born: and wich Alf is meant? The link leads only to an Explanation Site. If ALF (aka Gordon Shumway) from the TV-Serial is meant, than he is born on 28 Oct. 1756 according to the Series and his own Article. -- Hartmann Schedel  Prost  10:10, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alf?
Talk:1787

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:30, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1780#Images.  -Wikid77 12:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:1786

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:31, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1780#Images.  -Wikid77 12:20, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:1785

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:31, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1780#Images.  -Wikid77 12:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: I deleted the incorporation of Lincolnton County, NC, which is of markedly less significance than the rest of the events listed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.116.102.178 (talk) 13:33, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1784

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:32, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1780#Images.  -Wikid77 12:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: What about the reduction of the tea tariffs in Britain (the Tea Tax Act of 1784 ,or the Commication Act), which pretty much wiped out tea smuggling, which had been bringing in more tea that legal trade?  This is mentioned in the British Museum's  history of the world through 100 things and The History of Tea in Britain – Who Brought Tea to England? – TopicTea as well as History of Tea - Taxes and Smuggling In 18th Century England - TEA PARTY GIRL, History Of Tea , its Taxes and Smuggling -Teacupsfull, Tea, Tax, and Smuggling: What Made Britain a Tea Drinking Nation? – Intoxicating Spaces.  "The Commutation Act and the Tea Trade in Britain 1784–1793," by Hoh-Cheung andLorna H. Mui in the academic journal The Economic History Review Volume16, Issue2 December 1963, Pages 234-253 (The Commutation Act and the Tea Trade in Britain 1784–1793* - Hoh‐Cheung - 1963 - The Economic History Review - Wiley Online Library) even starts off by saying "By lowering duties so as to remove the incentive for smuggling, the Commutation Act of 1784 marks a turning-point in the history of British tea trade."  This seems to me to be important enough to be included in our article.Kdammers (talk) 16:23, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  tea tax
Talk:1783

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 12:32, 7 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :: [See: Talk:1780#Images.  -Wikid77 12:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images