Talk:List of mountain lists

message: There's a discussion to have the Listing parameter in  point to this article (see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mountains#Lists in Infobox). Pursuant to this discussion, I'm planning to restructure this article to only include notable lists of mountains (i.e., lists that can be documented with reliable sources). I'm planning on moving most of the current lists on this page to :Category:Lists of mountains or subcats: no information will be lost. Thanks! hike395 11:38, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Restructure article

message: I can think of no reason to publish mountains below 6000 foot Colorado Springs because plateau and plains exist at this elevation. So to have lower plains with mountains this high is for what purpose?  to ski down? The danger of tectonic global baptismal submergance (unless you wish to hold cynical skepticism calling it biblical) is all based on submerging the continental surface. This means the data most useful is all mountains above 6000 feet. Those of 4000 and 5000 are useless. For example at least the Appalachians inform us 13 mountains above 6000, mostly Smokies. But we have countries that have none over 6000, in Britain, in Indonesia, even Australia. A catclysmic Earth impact disaster would require these people to leave their countries illegally.98.144.71.174 (talk) 18:34, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless Mountain Data to Appease Politics 

message: Do we think the time has arrived to create a Hill lists in the United States article in the same way that there is a Hill lists in the British Isles article?  That way, we could restrict this list to just the most notable lists as we do with the British list, and use an article to provide slightly longer descriptions (a whole paragraph, rather than a sentence).  — ras52 (talk) 18:42, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the article is fine so far: I don't find the USian list of peaks to be too long. If we do decide to split, I would recommend naming the article Lists of U.S. mountains: the concept of "Hill List" seems to be local to the British Isles. hike395 (talk) 07:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Split out US content?

message: Conflict of interest alert:  I am webmaster of www.peakbagging.co.nz, which is a new peak bagging list for New Zealand.  I'll leave it to the editors of this page as to whether it should be included here.
On a related note, there is also a Tasmanian list that should be included here.  It is mentioned here: http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/12/14/2118695.htm and at http://www.geocities.com/Yosemite/Cabin/2008/PeakBaggersGuide.htm
Cheers
118.92.118.58 (talk) 08:19, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Peak Bagging lists for New Zealand and Tasmania, Australia

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of mountain lists. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150426105835/http://peakery.com/peaks/lists/ to http://peakery.com/peaks/lists/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: 125 4000 m summits in North America, of which 104 are in the US and 19 in Canada.  Making 123.  So where are the other two?  Not Mexico, because it has 8. Mr Larrington (talk) 21:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: * I've updated the List of the highest major summits of North America, the List of mountain peaks of Mexico, and Template:NA highest. Yours aye,  Buaidh  talk e-mail 06:16, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: D'oh!  Should’ve thought of ones on the border. (Hits self around head with theodolite) Mr Larrington (talk) 18:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something doesn’t add up