Talk:Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb

message: This section states: "After the war, Von Leeb was tried by a American military tribunal in Nuremberg in the High Command Trial. Due to a confusion of documents, Von Leeb was found guilty on one of four charges and sentenced to three years imprisonment; but he was released after the judgment because he had already spent more time in custody. He spent his last years living quietly with his family until his death in Füssen in 1956." 
The Bold text is confusing to me, and I believe it can be for many others. 
Does it mean 
a. That he was WRONGFULLY found guilty because of the confusion of the documents (meaning he was not guilty of any of the charges) 
OR 
b. That he was found guilty of ONLY one charge due to confusion of the documents (meaning he was actually guilty of more or all of the four charges, while only being found guilty of one)?? I don't know anything about his guy or his history, but found this ambiguity in the text... Mkruijff (talk) 17:59, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relations with Nazi's 

message: I think there are used too many vons in this article. For example: Hitler was not fond of von Leeb because of the general's anti-Nazi attitudes and religious convictions, and retired von Leeb in... - it should be Hitler was not fond of Leeb because of the general's anti-Nazi attitudes and religious convictions, and retired Leeb in....
Von means "of" or "from" and Wilhelm Ritter von Leeb means Wilhelm, Knight of Leeb. If you speak about Duke of Marlborough, you dont say "And then of Marlborough did this or did that". --WooteleF (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The difference is that "of Marlborough" was not his surname. "von Leeb" is a two element surname. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 17:25, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: von

message: I cleaned up the article, by reducing the amount of uncited and / or non-notable detail. Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:10, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article cleanup 

message: Cheeky little ce, changed some isbn 10 to 13s, altered author to last= first= deleted duplicate authorlinks, added a couple of trans-titles, rm dupe wikilinks tidied prose a la Word splendidiser. All suggestive so rv as desired. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 19:00, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: thank you. I made one minor change. Looks good! Thanks for fixing the references. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:14, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Always a pleasure to help a good article get a little better. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 09:10, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

text: Tidied a few loose ends, rv as preferred. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 09:45, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE 

message: Preserving here by providing this link. I objected to some of the excisions, as I disagree with the rationales provided, such as: All units of the army "cooperated with the einsatzgruppen", leeb did not play a special role between Wehrmacht-einsatzgruppen cooperation, it doesn't need to be in the introduction of his biography. Leeb's "special role" was that of the most senior commander in the field, which was investigated both during the High Command Trial and by historians more recently. --K.e.coffman (talk) 18:31, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  May 2019 edit 

message: I undid this recent addition: diff, as it included unneeded level of detail for the infobox, including units that Leeb served in (excessive for a sr commander); nn units; etc. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:31, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox edit