lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Michael E. Mann

message: I've removed the following links as contra WP:EL, WP:NOTEVERYTHING, WP:NOTDIRECTORY  I leave them here for possible future article development, not  excessive indiscriminate promotion. --Animalparty! (talk) 04:42, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive external links 

message: On 31 December 2022, Edwardx deleted 8 of 11 Awards from the Infobox, deprecating them as "few of the many awards are really notable".
I propose to restore 3, for a total of 6, adding back 3 awards whose recipients are quite distinguished:
1) The 2019 Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement, a $200,000 prize which as Wikipedia page says, is "regarded as the "Nobel for environment".
I attended this awards ceremnony.
2) The American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS) 2018 Public Engagement with Science Award, list of recipients.
AAAS has 120,000 members, spread around the world, and as Wikipedia says "the world's largest general scientific society." It publishes the journal Science, which as Wikipedia says, is "one of the world's top academic journals." I'm an AAAS member and have attended several of the big yearly meetings.
3) The American Geophysical Union(AGU) 2018 Climate Communications Prize, list of recipients
AGU is the leading geosciences society.
I'm a member of AGU, have attended half a dozen of the big Fall meetings, including one of the awards ceremonies. This award only started in 2011, as AGU finally realized that communication about climate change to the public was very important. 
All these awards are notable, especially because it is relatively rare to get awards for BOTH contributions to science (the 3 now in Infobox plus 1) AND for communications to public, 2) and 3) here.
Edwardx's deletion erased the communications awards. JohnMashey (talk) 00:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, and thanks for resolving this. . . dave souza, talk 08:51, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restore 3 awards in the Infobox
Talk:Messier 77

message: I wouldn't name the Milky Way Sagitarius A, but this isn't the point.  They call is Centaurus A yet it refers to the whole galaxy, not just the minor radio source.  The same thing is with Virgo A. — Hurricane Devon ( Talk ) 02:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messier 77 - Cetus A 

message: Appears in this paper:
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/aaa8df/meta
©Geni (talk) 20:05, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: New ALMA observations of dust orbiting central back hole

message: I have removed some recent edits which added mention of HIP 12668.  The reason is I fail to see the relevance of a Milky Way star that is bright and happens to be near to M77 when viewed from Earth. Furthermore, the addition of this fact then broke an existing reference elsewhere in the article. 84.93.167.157 (talk) 22:10, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the text you removed contained irrelevant information.   It was also worded a bit too informally, I think.  But it might be worth mentioning the star and its magnitude, since it could help casual observers locate the galaxy.PopePompus (talk) 22:57, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  HIP 12668 

message: The statement that NGC1068 is only the second observed extra-terrestrial neutrino source is incorrect.  IceCube has previously reported on the detection of neutrinos from the source TXS0506.  This was published in two papers in Science, and is nicely covered in the wikipedia article on that source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TXS_0506%2B056   This should be changed to say third source.  For information purposes, I am a member of the IceCube Collaboration, so not a disinterested observer, but this is well documented in the other article.  - Spencer Klein, Berkeley 2601:644:600:65F0:E864:AF59:1AC1:C1C8 (talk) 04:55, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in the neutrino section
Talk:Messier 78

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Messier 78.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for January 14, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-01-14. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:38, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Messier 69

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Move all.  —Wknight94 (talk) 23:19, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

message: star 105.206.71.45 (talk) 18:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is this
Talk:Common Market (hip hop group)

message: Why does Common Market have to refer to the European instance? There are other common markets, whether already in existance or developing. Xyzzyva 17:55, Jan 5, 2005 (UTC)
:yes, currently the article (single market) reflects this. Alinor 17:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsectioned comments

message: Common Market → Common Market (Music) – Common market → Common market (Economics) … Rationale: The only thing currently separating the economic term and the name of a music group (Common Market) is a capital letter and this appears to cause confusion and leads to trouble when using the "back" or "forward" buttons of internet explorer (explorer just skips over one article or the other). I think they should both be changed so that the music group goes from Common Market → Common Market (Music)  … Please share your opinion at Talk:Common market -- 208.131.183.198 17:25, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Byron Galvez

message: I removed the vanity tag b/c artist is notable.  Has a world record of sorts.
Roodog2k 17:56, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a photo of the mosaic that I found on commons. 69.126.127.193 (talk) 04:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Illinois Solidarity Party

message: I have removed this sentence:
:Since LaRouche had successfully delivered plans for the Strategic Defense Initiative to President Ronald Reagan, the Democrats were under orders to sever any ties with his candidates. 
until someone can provide strong support for the two remarkable assertions in it. It is relevent to know who did the ordering, what "plans" were delivered, and which LaRouche candidates were identified.  -Willmcw 18:13, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Konstanty Kalinowski

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Rejected  Jabbi (talk) 22:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Konstanty Kalinowski →  – This is how he is refered to in Belarusian, or Kastuś Kalinoŭski when Anglisized. Same with German, French and Swedish. However, Italian and Polish use Konstanty. Although a Google search for "Konstanty Kalinowski" yields 85k results against 6.4 k for "Kastus Kalinowski", searching for "Касту́сь Каліно́ўскі", Cyrillic version yields 150k results. A 1965 academic article on the subject, published in English, is simply named "Kastus Kalinouski" ().
Further clarification. It's my understanding that Konstanty is the "Polish version" and that Kastus is the Belarusian one and that both national narratives make a claim to him. However, at the time of his birth, his birthplace was part of the Russian Empire and Kastus is seen as a key figure in Belarusian history although Mostowlany is part of Poland today. Jabbi (talk) 00:41, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 July 2021
Talk:Mickey Rourke

message: Just seen a bit about him on the news, does the article mention his facial reconstructive surgery?
: Yes it does. ♟♙ (talk) 18:11, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reconstructive surgery 

message: Killshot is the only Rourke movie I have seen, and, thinking he was the one actor
who stood out the most (although I thought the story was good and the other 
actors were pretty good), I think the movie should be listed with his other movies,
https://ixquick-proxy.com/do/spg/show_picture.pl?l=english&rais=1&oiu=https%3A%2F%2Fupload.wikimedia.org%2Fwikipedia%2Fen%2F7%2F72%2FKillshotposter.jpg&sp=8abcaf45c6df18d270639ee238e598b8
Killshot (film)
2008 film by John Madden
Killshot is a 2008 American thriller film directed by John Madden and starring Diane Lane, Thomas Jane, Mickey Rourke and Joseph Gordon-Levitt...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mejane10 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a movie, Killshot 

message: According to IMDB, Mickey Rourke is dead. Is this true? - 72.2.237.37 (talk) 02:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, and IMDB is highly unreliable on biographic information. ♟♙ (talk) 13:52, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead? 

message: Boxing career 2600:387:F:4116:0:0:0:8 (talk) 01:51, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mickey Rourke
Talk:EMD FL9

message: I don't have any authoritative sources to go by, otherwise I'd add a section myself.  I myself have only bare details, e.g. the rebuild thereof was by ABB Traction, the locomotive horsepower was increased per unit to 3000, DC traction motors were replaced by AC traction motors, they could run in electric mode at GCT as opposed to having the prime mover running and belching diesel exhaust at the platforms there, one unit could haul a train versus two, and that's about it. Irishchieftain 06:21, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No details about FL9AC rebuilds? 

message: I've added headings and I think the article is OK.  May I remove the tag? If not, please say what further work is needed. Biscuittin (talk) 22:49, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit tag 

message: Discussion on LocoNotes about a heavy fuel B-A1A EMD locomotive called the "FG9". It was never built. Don Strack started the topic as he has correspondence between EMD and Union Pacific Superintendent of Motive Power Mr. Neuhart. --SSW9389 20:27, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FG9

message: Weight limit was for the Harlem River Bridge, not the entire Park Avenue viaduct; the three-axle rear truck reduced "axle loading" to fall within the bridge limit. 
 
3rd rail has been extended from Woodlawn to Pelham, about 2½ miles. This allows changeover (DC to AC & vice versa) to occur away from the NH-Harlem interlockings at Woodlawn. Keo (talk) 22:41, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections
Talk:Mari language

message: Does "It is a literary language" simply mean that Mari has a written form?  If not, what does it mean?  I think that should be explained better.  Dbenbenn 20:16, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Literary language. — Hippietrail 07:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literary language 

message: Perhaps these should be split off of each other and this page made into a disambiguation page? There are some major differences between the two.
- Yupik 15:03, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm currently working on a Multilangual dictionary ... 2000+ entries for Meadow Mari --> English, German, Estonian. Still in a development stage, but added a link to the article - http://mari.finno-ugristik.at/dict.html ChiLlBeserker (talk) 21:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Versions of Mari 

message: If you are a native speaker of Mari then you can help translate this template into your own language:
 Edit
--Amazonien (talk) 22:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mari language template

message: Should the illative пӧртышкем be translated as 'into my house' -- would it not be 'to my house'?  Silver starfish (talk) 10:09, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illative 
Talk:Handle

message: It seems pretty clear that a bar rotated by gripping just with the fingertips -- a Camelback-brand hiker or cyclist's hydration system opens this way -- is also a handle, but it brings you close to what i'm less sure of: does your eagle-claw grip on the edges of a screw-top jar top (fingers spread rather than parallel) make the edge of the top a handle?  I don't think a screw-top bottle cap belongs in this article, and it's hard to be sure in drawing the line.  I mean, we're talking about drawing a line, not finding the line, IMO.
I've left out a fire-door panic bar and the lever of an old-fashioned well pump (you push, not pull), and handle bars and steering wheels.  Plenty of writing to do, and IMO this is nearly all right and verifiable but not verified.
--Jerzy(t) 20:23, 2005 Jan 5 (UTC)
Delete second sentence  buttocks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.253.224.18 (talk) 01:31, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Do Not Adjust Your Set

message: Terry Jones discussed this in a bonus documentary on the At Last the 1948 Show dvd set, discussing how the members of Monty Python became aware of each other and started performing together. I believe he had a statement like, "Adults were leaving work early around the country, in order to get home in time for the DNAYS 4 PM airing."  I can't find the documentary in IMDB ... does anyone have the DVD set? -- David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 12:25, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popularity with adults  (citation needed) 

message: Is there a source for this? In the history of Python related interviews , I've only heard of The Bonzos being associated with the show. It's true , several member of the Bonzos  , after they broke up , wound up playing with Bob Kerr. It's also true Bob Kerr was a Bonzo , pre-DNAYS. But , neither of those configurations happened during DNAYS. Is there an unknown reference or is this guess work? 75.104.174.20 (talk) 15:39, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bob Kerr's Whoopie Band ? 

message: Apparently there was a third season of this thing, but because the Pythons weren't in on it, Denise Coffey and David Jason did the only routine that they were known for without the Pythons in it, and the show was re-titled "Captain Fantastic and Mrs. Black". (Sorry I didn't know whether it should be mentioned here, or at Captain Fantastic .)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:C519:940:498A:E6A8:BBF9:2E96 (talk) 23:45, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Season 

message: Does anyone have a list of episodes and which of them are missing?
Ttenchantr (talk) 01:14, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Episodes?
Talk:Session layer

message: "The Session layer is typically completely unused, but it does have a few places where it is useful." As Wikipedians contribute, we are logged into Wikipedia. How can these two statements both be true?
I take it http 1.0 didn't implement sessions, and that 1.1 does. I don't know whether http sessions are nowadays typical events or exotic events, but I suspect they are typical.
--Munge 21:12, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction?

message: I read in lots of places (also in wikipedia) that PPTP belongs to the data link layer of the OSI model. You can find it PPTP page itself, in this table OSI_model#Examples and in lots of places in internet. If nobody will object it, I will remove PPTP from this page in 7 days. --Sena (talk) 08:22, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The PPTP article make not a single mention of OSI, and in the OSI article you cite it is not listed under OSI either, but under the comparison to TCP/IP.  Given the strict layering in OSI it would be hard to fit it in below where connection oriented protocols are, but TCP/IP makes no such assumptions, where it certainly acts like a link protocol, but certainly can fit in with the Application Layer as well. Kbrose (talk) 15:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: PPTP is not a session layer, but data link layer

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Physical Layer - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 03:45, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Nanofactory

message: It might be nice to go into more detail about Drexler's and Chris Phoenix's nanofactory designs. There's a ton of material in Nanosystems which could be summarized, together with some of the more recent papers by Merkle, Freitas and Phoenix.
There's an animation linked at Nanodot which walks through the hypothetical "production lines" of a nanofactory. It might also be worthwhile to discuss the relative merits of molecular mills and general-purpose manipulators; I hear there's been some back-and-forth on this issue in the Drexler camp.
It would also be nice to discuss the actual feasibility of a nanofactory in some detail, citing research both for and against. Oh, to have enough free time.
--Emk 21:36, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Ohio Democratic Party

message: ==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
 This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 January 2021 and 7 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Dwolfor3.
==Untitled==
Where did this section come from, and what does it have to do with the Ohio Democratic Party specifically? It appears to have been written by a contributor as what s/he thinks the DP is in general. Perhaps this section would find a better home in the Democratic Party article; or if it is something from Ohio (their party statement, or something?) then it can be worked back in with a little more context. Rebrane 21:44, Jan 5, 2005 (UTC)
Sorry - I'm new. This was from the ODP site. I wanted to list what they said they stood for to show differences between them and other organizations. -czawadzki
==Material removed as POV?==
I notice a lot of information has been removed from this article, about the history and current fortunes of the party, possibly as POV. I believe that information was presented in a factual manner. If there was some disagreement about the language or the facts, I would invite someone to tweak it, but the result of just removing the information is a rather uninformative article. 149.79.146.138 21:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We lie, cheat, steal and are the worlds best projectionist and hypocrites. 50.43.211.195 (talk) 20:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Democratic Principles

message: I notice a lot of information has been removed from this article, about the history and current fortunes of the party, possibly as POV. I believe that information was presented in a factual manner. If there was some disagreement about the language or the facts, I would invite someone to tweak it, but the result of just removing the information is a rather uninformative article. 149.79.146.138 21:49, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Material removed as POV?

message: The page could use more info about the party's policy stances, so I added a new section about the party platform and filled in some basic info. I also added info about Chairwoman Walters and inserted the party acronym (ODP) at the beginning of the article. All new info is cited. Dwolfor3 (talk) 02:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: We lie, cheat, steal and are the worlds best projectionist and hypocrites. 50.43.211.195 (talk) 20:15, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: New Section on Party Platform & Other Misc. Changes

message: If you guys don't get on the ball and start getting signs out in large numbers issue 1 will be defeated.  there are a large number of vote NO signs out in the Cincinnati area. 74.215.213.173 (talk) 02:28, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue 1
Talk:A+ (programming language)

message: Somehow that seemed more like a sales pitch for A+ than a real article about it. I'd like to know exactly why its so efficant and portable and wonderful.
:Mostly fixed. This could really use a screenshot, though. I'll put one in later. Quamaretto 14:13, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sales pitch?

message: There is a lot of implicit casting going on, does that still qualify as strong typing? 83.67.217.254 14:20, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typing Discipline: Strong? 

message: What is a successor language?  I would imagine that Algol 68 is a successor to Algol 64.  Maybe Fortran 90 a successor to Fortran IV and Fortran II.  Or C++ a successor to C.  Lacking a suitable definition, I intuitively feel that in order to be a true successor, a language should offer something of a migration path and be similar to the old language in many important details.  Not so for A+ to K, it may share authors, and both may be similar to APL.
I took the statement that K is a successor to A+ out as it sounded too much like a sales pitch.  
If there is a successor to A+, it might be Java, provided that (ugh) Morgan starts rewriting their A+ applications in Java.
Monadic Mike 20:41, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Successor language? 

message: It's well within reason to state that this article appears to be more of an advertisement; promoting the language rather than just purely providing neutral information about the topic. I believe it needs some re-writing. Indigochild777 (talk) 04:07, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality Issues 

message: You mean its extensions thump you through the computer screen? Its absurd to describe it in this way. And saying its got "aggressive extensions" fails to give any significant information anout those extensions, since "agression in the context of computer languages is undefined. 89.240.202.189 (talk) 23:44, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's also foul-mouthed. A google on site www.aplusdev.org on aggressive gives one hit, and not in connections with "extensions". I think the terming is a verbal blunder intended to be some admiring phrase but giving the exact opposite impression. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 14:43, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I cleaned up this one. I'm not quite sure that A was a large extension of APL, since aplusdev.org doesn't claim that A is APL extended. Instead it claims that A was developed to replace APL. I rewrote so. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 15:02, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Aggressive extensions"? 

message: Now, why was the article marked ? Such a template addition should be accompanied with a note on the talk page. I can't see any. Merging with other articles is not an option, that would disrupt the candidate destination articles. The fact that A+ somehow is a descendent to APL makes it notable. The issue is not notability, it is that there are too few independent sources. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 15:02, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?
Talk:West End (Richmond, Virginia)

message: Zip codes in the West End are roughly as follows:
23226
23227
23228
23229
23230
Not sure if zip codes of the west end merits inclusion in the article just yet. The intent is to flesh out the individual exit ramps with info about each region. If this isn't the best way to do it I need to hear soon.
132.159.147.99 22:34, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Zip Codes 

message: 23233, 23238 (also part of Goochland) Wouldn't 23060 be another West End areacode?  I think Glen Allen is considered as part of the West End.  Va girl2468 03:15, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other West End zip codes

message: Should VCU and MCV be listed here? I never thought of either campus being in the West End. Monroe Park campus is in the Fan and MCV is downtown. I'm removing it becauase it does seem out of place, but if anyone feels it's justified, give your reasons why. eaglescout1984  —Preceding undated comment added 13:54, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: VCU/MCV?