lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:State Theatre (Melbourne)

message: While I support the removal of the category "Opera Houses" from the Melbourne Arts Centre, the State Theatre is one of the several venues in that Centre and it IS the one where opera is performed by a variety of companies.
Check the category list below and you'll see that worldwide opera venues are listed there.
:Category:Opera houses
Vivaverdi 16:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  State Theatre IS an Opera House 

message: This is a weird article, combining two completely different theatres just because they both at different points in history shared the same name. Unless objections, I'm going to make the article about the current State Theatre, and move the content about the Old State Theatre to the Forum Theatre article and just maintain a sentence for historical context. Boneymau (talk) 23:12, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems sensible to me. The current confusion started when an anonymous editor  on 5 September 2009. That should be removed and a hatnote should be added: "For the former State Theatre (1929) in Melbourne, see Forum Theatre."  -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:27, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird article
Talk:Ntfsresize

message: :dangerous to use, as such disk failures are likely to affect other sectors without software detecting it first
Not all partitions are on disks (eg: USB drives), and not all failures affect other sectors.  In fact - aside from disks that are shortly about to completely fail - I disagree that a bad sector is "likley" to affect other sectors.  It may - sure - but it's not "likley".
: Does this mean that bad sector markers are copied to resized partition? 
Sounds like a crazy question to me - if they did *not* do that, it would be flagrantly negligent and dangerous... eg: highly improbable.
: Or does it means undetected bad sectors on space where resised partition is going to be build can make errors?
Having just used the facility - I can say for certain that it does not read all disk sectors - it only modifies ones that are affected.  Thus - it will be unable to "find" any new bad sectors to mark for you, and if you happen to have some which are about to get used - it will be upto (A) the O/S to mark them later, when they fail, or (B) S.M.A.R.T to reallocate the failed ones for you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.137.129 (talk) 12:52, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  questions re re-sizing around bad sectors (moved from article into discussion) 

message: I added this because this sentence: 
:It is often shown that Ntfsresize is safer than commercial alternatives such as PartitionMagic or Partition Commander, as it has several safety checks and rigorous testing from many people (while commercial alternatives might have just a few people testing on few volumes).
Sounds more like open-source propaganda than descriptive text.   I agree with the open-source propaganda btw, but that's not the point.
- PhilipR 16:09, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV-check 

message: This article is rather outdated: links are broken, and doesn't reflect the merge of ntfsprogs with ntfs-3g. As others have asked, is this article necessary, or can it be deleted/merged into ntfs-3g? ChrstphrChvz (talk • contribs) 08:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated article
Talk:Adam Thoroughgood House

message: Is this house based on the Hall and parlor house layout? --T.woelk (talk) 20:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  House plan 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/James Crotty

message: I also think that copyvi is irrelevant here. Possibly the writer will improve the content in future. Aslo to those pseudo professors, the fact that you get more hits in google does prove nothing if anythin, I am a person in my 20 and my search also gets 10 times more returns that James Crotyy's. But it doesn't mean that I am more prominent than him. To those jealos and useless professors in this comment page, please, don't compare yourself to James Crotty. The sheer fact that you are a professor and spend your time on comments page, indicate how good professor you are. Writing 100 of sheet articles that mose of mainstream economists have done is even not equal to one article that this Professor has written. The deletion of info about him would be a crime against economics. Ramil--71.195.182.195 05:02, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Roman Rosen

message: I will be visiting a large US metropolitan library to review the series of 40 articles that were published in the Saturday Evening Post in 1919. SimonATL 16:17, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See the pointer to his SEP biblio that I have added to the Notes section of the article :) Ahasuerus 17:08, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Availability of the Saturday Evening Post Interviews

message: I've changed the death date (previously January 22, 1922), as it seems to be wrong. The Library of Congress catalog authority confirms he died in 1921; and the New York Times of 21 December 1923 (discussing the marriage of his daughter to Eric Dahlgren) states "Baron Rosen died in this city [i.e., New York City] in December, 1921, following his being knocked down by a taxicab a week previous. He was then 74." The obituary of Baron Roman R. Rosen was published in the New York Time on January 1, 1922 and the two following days, and the date of death given therein was Dec. 31, 1921. - Nunh-huh 17:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: death date

message: In the context of the two images which are posted, this one image seems redundant. Tenmei (talk) 13:49, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant image
Talk:19XX: The War Against Destiny

message: Mosquito The slow but powerful plane. The Mosquito lacks in speed and homing, but is a hard hitter in plain brute force. Its special weapon is the red 3 way "Missiles."
Reading De_Havilland_Mosquito and watching Mosquito Doc Part 2 - Youtube (saying  that it was the fastest airplane 400mph - 20 more than the spitfire.), one might consider adding to this site that the Mosquito is a slow plane in the game contrary to reality.
JanCK 18:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mosquito 
Talk:Old School Square

message: Is the term "National Historic Site" as self-proclaimed designation, or does it have any federal authority in terms of Old School Square?  The website comments at length on historic preservation awards, but there is not one mention of an actual act of Congress or the Secretary of Interior recognizing the place as a National Historic Site.  My searches of Acts of Congress (since 1989) and the Federal Register (since 1997) came up blank. — Eoghanacht talk 16:21, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: National Historic Site?

message: This article's text seems bulky to me. I think we can be clear that we're talking about the buildings which make up the historic site without saying Delray Elementary School and Delray High School each time. I will perform some tidying soon, if there is no objection. MKoltnow 02:03, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup project 
Talk:Ammassalik Municipality

message: Qernertuarssuit is mentioned as being a recently abandoned settlement. When I was last in East Greenland, which was 20 years ago, Qernertuarssuit was a small house occupied for the most part by a couple, who rented out floor space for visiting hunters and fishermen from the larger settlements nearby. I remember visiting it in the middle of winter and being surprised by the variations in temperature from -30c outside to close on +30c in the house. It may be that the house is still used, but now no longer is considered to be permanently occupied. --Dumbo1 16:24, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: abandoned
Talk:Mellieħa

message: It's a very pretty picture, but not particularly encyclopedic. A much more useful picture for this article would actually show the town itself. After all, without the caption saying it's Mellieha, that could be a sunset anywhere. Do you have anything else? howcheng  {chat} 16:26, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:image:Mellieha-red skies.jpg]]

message: :Mellieha → Mellieħa — I am proposing to rename the article from Mellieha to Mellieħa (h > ħ) as it is the proper name of the village and the former spelling has fallen out of use since the British occupation. If an admin could please remove the old redirect and move the page it would be appreciated. —78.133.79.168 (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: . howcheng  {chat} 16:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Criticisms of Charismatic and Pentecostal belief

message: Much of this article, or in versions within the history, could be profitably be merged into Charismatic movement (note that we now have a paltry paragraph instead of an entire article on this aspect of the topic...) and/or Pentecostalism. Therefore, I have temporarily undeleted this page into Talk:Charismatic movement/Criticism salvage whereby editors can merge in useful material from it. — Matt Crypto 16:29, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Defense Message System

message: Alright, I've removed that massive unwikified and poorly written text block. The 1st part of it was pure partizanry and the latter was not understandable. I also suggest that people here sign yourself. Thanx. 68.39.174.238 14:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What...?! 
Talk:Naglfar

message: No, StarCraft does not have any Terran ship-type named Naglfar.
It is possible that the storyline contains a craft that is named Naglfar, but whoever edited that should correct it back.
Putting it away for the time being (to not confuse others)
-213.89.141.235
Yes it does, in the storyline as you mentioned.  It really annoys me when people don't even bother to check up the appropriate articles when they're linked to on the page itslef! --91.105.56.120 22:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  StarCraft? 

message: According to WP:Trivia, I've removed all that "references in literature" and "video games" crap... --Attilios 22:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Banned trivia

message: Please provide info on why Snorri Sturlason, a Christian living in a society that had been Christian for two centuries, should present heathen mythology. St.Trond (talk) 05:15, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Naglfar#Attestations. Read it. :bloodofox: (talk) 12:11, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Snorri Sturlason is not a reliable source on Norse mythology. What about his story about the sea serpent Olaf II slayed and landed on Syltefjellet? St.Trond (talk) 12:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, Wikipedia. Trond, please pry your foot from your mouth long enough to realize that Snorri didn't compose Völuspá (which is in this book we call the Poetic Edda, check it out sometime....), from which he based his description in his Prose Edda (and, that said, he definitely had access to traditional material now lost to us). Secondly, Snorri is absolutely a primary source for Norse mythology, Euhemerisms aside. Third, nobody is putting forth a claim anywhere that this refers to an actual ship (and if such a theory were to be somehow pushed by a scholar somewhere, then it would need to be appropriately cited—not advanced by slipping in little hints), especially since it has Indo-European mythical cognates and connections to Indo-European religious practices involving fingernails, toenails, and hair (which have not yet been added since I'm away from my books). :bloodofox: (talk) 12:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A mythological ship?
Talk:Extracellular

message: When citing GO, it would be best to refer to AmiGO- AmiGO is an 'official' product of GO, EBI is not related. Sort of like citing information about Texas from a website made by Iowa.  http://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo/term/GO:0005615 would be the right source but I don't know exactly how to cite it on this page. As stated on http://geneontology.org/page/go-citation-policy#GO_Data, please include the file version or DOI for any GO definitions- this is on the bottom of AmiGO pages ( DOI 10.5281/zenodo.1899458; Last file loaded on 2018-12-02).  The Ontology is more or less a living being and some parts are expected to change between releases. 
Also, the important info that is cited as the "GO definition" is mostly from ISBN:0198547684, this may be a more appropriate source.  The GOC (GO Consortium) should be cited for the Comment: "Note that for multicellular organisms, the extracellular space refers to everything outside a cell, but still within the organism (excluding the extracellular matrix). Gene products from a multi-cellular organism that are secreted from a cell into the interstitial fluid or blood can therefore be annotated to this term."
I edited out the "database" bit because it's the GOC that makes the ontology, the database is just where it's accessed.
Thank you all!
GO (please contact our Helpdesk on GitHub for any clarifications)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.66.209.5 (talk) 23:13, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: GO citation

message: I don't see why extracellular needs its own article. It can be a category in cell.  Anyone agree? --Brazucs (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  I don't see why it needs to be combined.  Cburnett 01:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Tamaz Nadareishvili

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- KenWalker | Talk 06:56, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: There were two main mistakes. Allegation of Nadareishvilis involvement with KGB was proven to be false and used as provocation by his opponents. Therefore, the argument is not relevant to his biography. 
Nadareishvili was involved in the group which called itself  “Georgian National Liberation Movement” headed by Merab Kostava, Zviad Gamsakhurdia and others. 
Nadareishvilis involvement with “Forest Borthers” and ‘White legion” were allegations without any prove or indication of him being involved in the partisan movements or transferring funds from refugees. 
Article also should mention his book with collection of facts concerning alleged ethnic-cleansing and genocide of Georgians (this book was used by Hague War Crimes tribunal and submitted to UN and OSCE for review). Noxchi Borz 16:36, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some mistakes
Talk:Zabok

message: This statement with the tag on is unverifiable and sounds like POV. Computerjoe's talk 16:44, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about the POV thing, but I started to Wikify the page.  Nothing grand, just a start.  Brina700 04:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the arts section was about a guy from Gredice rather than Zabok anyway, and the rest was certainly NPOV so I removed it. Wikified the article and removed the tag - if you think it still needs work feel free to re-add it / tell me. --Phl3djo 12:39, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Talk:Dollywaggon Pike

message: The height of High Crag was given as (2990 ft / 884 m). The convert template changed this to (2990 ft / 910 m). The exact conversion is 911.352m. The previous figure was incorrect. The current figure is correct up to rounding. OrewaTel (talk) 08:40, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect height
Talk:Sines

message: Should this be a disambiguation page? Amalas 16:49, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page 

message: Origin: wikidata
Timezone: http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q36669  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.123.10.200 (talk) 17:15, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data Inconsistency - Ambiguous Timezone
Talk:Group scheme

message: Regarding the fact that matrix inversion is polynomial, wouldn't the usual Cayley-Hamilton argument make this clearer? Michael Kinyon 16:49, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, OK, I guess since Cayley-Hamilton follows from Cramer's Rule, it's not really all that different. Still, there is something about the way the argument is written here that is unsatisfactory. I just can't quite put my finger on it. Michael Kinyon 16:53, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Another construction (perhaps a more natural one) interprets GL(n) as a group in 2n^2 coordinates, namely as a group of mutually inverse pairs of n by n matrices. In other words: GL(n)={(A,B)|AB=1}. Matrix inversion is just swapping coordinates and hence obviously polynomial. Lenthe 09:48, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some changes have been made in the article. The terminology is tricky because abelian scheme is a concept derived from abelian variety, and therefore it is usual to say "commutative group scheme". Charles Matthews (talk) 16:55, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Commutative and abelian

message: In the definition, instead of "presheaf corresponding to G under the Yoneda embedding", should it be the "S-scheme corresponding to G under the Yoneda embedding"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.45.136.158 (talk) 00:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it looks right as it is.  As defined, G is an S-scheme, the presheaf is the image of G under the Yoneda embedding, i.e. G considered as a representable functor from (S-scheme)op  to Sets.  It is just saying that the Yoneda embedding factors through a functor from (S-scheme)op to Groups, that the S-scheme morphisms into the S-scheme G functorially form a group.  More concretely, just saying that G(R), the R-valued points of G, the solutions of the systems of equations defining G in a ring R (it is enough to take (affine schemes)op = rings as where we are evaluating G) nicely form groups with arrows going where they should when we have ring homomorphisms, e.g. G(Z)-->G(Q)-->G(R)-->G(C) or G(Z) --> G(Z/pZ). The book of Demazure and Gabriel I added to the refs is a very good place to learn such things.John Z (talk) 02:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: I am not too sure, but- 
Talk:Tabatha Cash

message: Most of this content is unsourced. To the editors of this page, please provide sources for the information contained within per Wikipedia's citation policy. Thanks! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud 07:01, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: The page is not clear on Cash's position in Hot Video Group. Is she CEO of the company now? Did her late husband transfer ownership & shares of the company directly to her? Could someone clarify this? Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.249.184.199 (talk) 19:27, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Tabatha Cash the CEO of Hot Video Group?!
Talk:Brigitte Lahaie

message: So showing the cover of a book someone has written is not fair use ? Hektor 05:23, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You may have already gotten an answer to this, but just in case you haven't: As I understand it, you can only use the cover of a book in an article about that book.  I ran into the issue first when I was mystified about the deletion of the cover of the Born to Run album from the Springsteen page, next to paragraph about the Born to Run tour.  I found out that the only fair use for the cover of the album was in an article about the album.  I'll bet the same holds true for books. Cheers. David in DC (talk) 14:25, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh at last an answer, thanks so much. Now that's clear. Meanwhile, I was lucky enough to meet her, but unfortunately I didn't have a camera with me. Hektor (talk) 15:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Book cover removed

message: Lahaie's name 'Vanmeerhaeghe' and specifically the 'haeghe' part (or haag in standard Dutch) does not mean 'fence'. It means a hedge; which may well be used as a boundary or obstacle, but is not a fence, which is a specific structure used as a boundary/barrier.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 145.130.113.142 (talk) 17:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Resurrection Man (character)

message: Are there any instances of Mitch reappearing after the cancellation of his series? -69.249.92.211 16:57, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've moved this back to DC Comics Immortals. If there;s debate over wether or not the categories should exit then the category can be nominated for deletion/merging with Category:Fictional Immortals. Until that happens this page belongs in Category:DC Comics Immortals. Palendrom 02:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories 

message: The list in the article ought to give mention of which issues these deaths, and the powers granted by them, occurred. Kouban 05:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable deaths/powers 

message: I don't think being a woman is a super power, should we specify that ressurection man(/woman?) has no powers beyond feminine intuition?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.125.136.225 (talk) 11:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powers as a woman 
Talk:The Lost Files of Sherlock Holmes

message: Pretty much the entire introductory paragraph has to be changed- it couldn't be more blatantly NPOV. -- Kicking222 16:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Underdogs are a very grey area, if you look at their FAQ, it says that abandonware is NOT lega, therefore unless they get the explicit permission of the company, hosting a game is still technically illegal. Douglasnicol (talk) 00:26, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Acne-treating agents

message: *The link for tetracyclines should point to the overall group of antibiotics tetracycline antibiotics, rather than tetracycline, a single member of the group (there is also oxytetracycline, doxycycline, lymecycline, minocycline)
*Should the template list like with like, i.e. be more like:
:Topical agents: {Azelaic acid} (Benzoyl peroxide} {Glycolic acid} {Light therapy} {Salicylic acid} {Tea Tree Oil (Melaleuca Oil)}</br>
:Antibiotics:  {Clindamycin} {Erythromycin} (Tetracyclines) {Trimethoprim}</br>
:Hormonal: {Antiandrogens} {Contraceptives}. Retinoids: {Adapalene} {Isotretinoin} {Tazarotene} {Tretinoin}</br>
David Ruben  Talk  16:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template layout

message: Should co-trimoxazole be really included? acne isn't even mentioned once in its article. Mikr18 09:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No - Sub-component Trimethoprim (here in UK co-trimoxazole has very restricted use and never for acne), was very much antibiotic of last choice (after tetracyclines and macrolides), off-license use, only to be prescribed by specialists (i.e. not GPs), and quite honestly I've not seen this issued by specialists in years (since introduction of topical and oral retinoids). Co-trimoxazole not used in UK (at least for 15yrs I've been practising, if ever) for acne.David Ruben  Talk  11:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Sulfacetamide is another candidate for removal as hardly counts as having widespread use, ie does it count as a trivial item as per WP:Undue weight ? However PubMed generated 14 hits, so are there any dermatologists who might care to comment on including this in the list ?  David Ruben  Talk  01:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Content