lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thomas Keightley

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support. After reviewing the stats and the articles, it is clear that the other Thomas Keightley's are of comparatively minimal importance. Cheers! bd2412 T 13:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Thomas Keightley (historian) → Thomas Keightley move is justified if WP:PRIMARYTOPIC is met, and it does:
#* Searched "Thomas Keightley" string in "scholar.google.com", limited to "1900-present" time frame. The time constraint is to answer to the second criterion of "long-term significance". 
#* Crude analysis of a sample of 100 hits: 98 related to my primary, and 2 related to the secondary.  The Thomas Keightley (official) received passing mention in just two papers (D Hayton (1991) and T Doyle (1997)). 
#* If the search had been books.google, the results would be more overwhelmingly close to 100 to 0, since primary is an author of several books still or recently in print. The secondary has no published works in library catalog, except for an archived legal document. 
# "Thomas Keightley (historian)" label is obsolete, since he is more known now as author/commentator of Fairy Mythology and other legend and mythological works.
#*The breakdown of the 98 hits above is roughly: 80 mythology & folklore, 10 literary criticism (usually Milton), 5 Crusades and other history, 3 Secret society.
#* Search turns up two short bios of the primary in recent years, Burton Feldman (1972) and Dorson (1999), both are folklore-related.
# Current wiki articles on the two figures are a poor basis for assessing equal noteworthiness.
#* They are almost entirely based on DNB (Dictionary of National Biography) from 1892 or earlier. Obsolete sense of relative importance, not reflective of current prevailing interest, which has been addressed above.
#* Even looking at the primary's article in DNB (1892), there is overemphasis on his history book writing, compared to current interest. Some details such as the books appearing in 8vo, or who it is dedicated to are of trivial importance, and not routinely written up in articles of other authors of the 18th century. --Kiyoweap (talk) 00:10, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale
Talk:Thomas Negovan

message: I have moved all the content from Three Years Ghost into this article.  That article was nominated for speedy deletion 2 years ago, but the tag was removed with the rationale that there was a notable band member (Negovan).  I don't think there is anywhere near enough content to justify more than one article. —Akrabbimtalk 13:06, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Three Years Ghost]] 

message: There are a lot of issues with this article. I've tagged them, and I will work on them a bit later. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 21:59, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues with the article
Talk:Smithson Tennant

message: At time of writing, despite some effort, I have failed to find a verifiable picture of Smithson Tennant, and have a suspicion that there is none to be found. I'd like to be wrong about that, but...
I have discovered many incorrect ones. In particular, do not confuse a widely found picture of James Smithson wrongly captioned as Smithson Tennant. (James Smithson's image can be found on the Smithsonian Institution's website, as the donor of the money which founded it.) There are other spurious pictures which can be correctly identified by doing a Google Lens search on such an image.
This note is offered as a caution before any picture, purporting to be Smithson Tennant, is added to the article. IGE (talk) 05:20, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of Smithson Tennant
Talk:Monomorium antarcticum

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 09:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Monomorium smithi

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 22:57, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Monomorium fieldi

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 09:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Solomon Andrews (inventor)

message: Great Article! Always wondered whi Dr. Andrews given more credit in Airship design and flying against wind  a non motor aircrship!?THEEDSON1 (talk) 18:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How about the Smithsonia gaving a Dr. Solomon Andrews Day an exhibit in honor of Dr. Andrews?! Thanks! 01:09, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:   WE NEED RECOGNATION OF THIS GREAT AVAIATION PIONEER!
Talk:Prolasius advenus

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 06:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Austroponera castaneicolor

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 02:22, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Austroponera castanea

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 02:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 
Talk:Delancey

message: This is a really interesting and very influential early (predominently loyalist) American family of soldiers and politicians.  I have added two names, but there are more.  I think that it would be most appropriate if an american colleague contributed/supplemented articles.  
There is a British connection, in that there was a general departure of the DeLanceys' to England after the American Revolution - Sir William Howe DeLancey who was born New York (1778 - 1815) was one of the first professional staff officers in the British Army, worked for Wellington throughout the Peninsular War and was his chief of staff at the Battle of Waterloo.
Throughgrittedteeth 08:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bryan Niebling

message: It's not spelt Niebling?--Jeff79 20:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: You have Bryan's birthday wrong. I know him and he is turning 50 this year in 2010. You have him as too old!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.26.16.236 (talk) 01:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed as per qrl.com.au --Jeff79 (talk) 05:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Age
Talk:Somdej Toh

message: My person has added the "Legends of Somdet Toh" and created a source section, which might be useful to expand the Bio. My persons English skills are to weak to write more. May it be of good use. (Samana Johann) --203.144.92.223 (talk) 02:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio and stories about Somdej Toh
Talk:Sophie Hagman

message: Most of the references were to a single book. I corrected the reference style to used a single named reference for all the duplicates. I found an online version, so I included the url (although after doing so, it appears there is an online version at the bottom of the article; if that link is better either replace it or tell me and I'll do so.)
I converted to WP:LDR although that will only be clear in edit mode.--SPhilbrickT 00:59, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing issues
Talk:Sophie of Württemberg

message: Since so other titles are used and since her sister is refered to as Caroline of Brunswick, the article's ancestry chart ought to remain the same.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cladeal832 (talk • contribs) 18:55, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Incorrect, when the ancestry charts were first being implemented, they were being linked as the article titles did or should appear, according to WP:NC(NT) and also to avoid redirects. They are going to be changed back to that form for the sake of consistency with article titles and with WP:NC(NT), which is a standard for article titles. Wikipedia is not consistent for all royals and WP:NC(NT) only gives consistency for groups of royals, such as monarchs, consorts and other royals. Charles 20:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

text: The fact of the matter is, the names are linked according to WP:NC(NT), or filled in that way, so if I person decides to write an article by seeing the name, they can put brackets around it and link from there. It avoids misleading people to create articles under titles that will only be moved because of WP:NC(NT). Charles 06:19, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per my exact reasoning above, which was not addressed, I am reverting the article per the advice of an administrator. Charles 03:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Margravine 

message: Just wondering if a creditable source on where she actually die?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.196.130 (talk) 04:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no doubt about the place of death: The Hague, Huis ten Bosch Palace. However, the whole article is in need of references!  Michel Doortmont (talk) 09:11, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of Death
Talk:Timothy Wilson

message: He maid one (of the most important) study about that: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/345/6192/75 greatings from switzerland --93.184.30.196 (talk) 22:51, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks for the information. I've added the journal entry to the article. Regards from the north of England amidst the floods. Esowteric+Talk 10:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social study
Talk:Sorakichi Matsuda

message: What is the source for Matuda's real name?  Dan20001 (talk) 21:14, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Real name
Talk:Tom DeMarco

message: Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed the worksection of this article for now. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 09:31, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I doublechecked the remaining article and made some corrections. -- Mdd (talk) 20:10, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worksection removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Tom DeMarco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040303035747/http://www.bus.ucf.edu:80/shornik/ism6121/Readings/TDMSpringer2002.pdf to http://www.bus.ucf.edu/shornik/ism6121/Readings/TDMSpringer2002.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091103121552/http://www.unt.edu:80/cdit/3.0/demarco.htm to http://www.unt.edu/cdit/3.0/demarco.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020408090856/http://www.cutter.com:80/consortium/ to http://www.cutter.com/consortium/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 Perry Middlemiss (talk) 08:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Link in to "Software Engineering: An Idea Whose Time Has Come and Gone?" is broken, but IA has it:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100801083400/http://www2.computer.org/cms/Computer.org/ComputingNow/homepage/2009/0709/rW_SO_Viewpoints.pdf
If this is correct, could someone do it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.0.36.74 (talk) 16:26, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Though the article in IEEE Software is behind a paywall, the IA copy shows that it was openly available at Computing Now when archived. I think linking to it is fine and am adding it. StarryGrandma (talk) 18:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it OK to replace broken link to "maybe-restricted" material with Internet Archive Link?
Talk:Crying Out for Me

message: kuykfkuyfk  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.27.204.224 (talk) 04:00, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ihu 
Talk:St. George Tucker

message: This article needs more sources, depends too much on one source and POV of Wilson. Parkwells (talk) 17:02, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more sources

message: Why does his name start with St.  Is that an abbreviation for Saint?  Why was he called a Saint? -ErinHowarth (talk) 06:34, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saint?
Talk:Stanisław Kostka Potocki

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.wilanow-palac.pl/potocki_stanislaw_kostka_2.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File: will be appearing as picture of the day on March 12, 2020. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2020-03-12. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:41, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:{{Remove file prefix|Jacques-Louis David - Equestrian portrait of Stanisław Kostka Potocki - Google Art Project.jpg}}]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Live from Wembley Arena, London, England

message: In the middle of Get the Party Started is a short break where she is singing the chorus from Sweet Dreams (Are Made of This) (song). --93.134.125.53 (talk) 09:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: FYI
Talk:Lithia Motors

message: Hi there - I'd like to make some edits to the Lithia Motors page. Items like an updated logo and more updated information on their Headquarters project etc. What's the best way to go about it? In full disclosure, I am a PR firm, but I'm not adding non-neutral content, just updating content and logos. It looks like the last time items were entered was '07. I'd like to go about it as ethically as I can, following Wiki rules. Any help is greatly appreciated! Thanks. 
Charismacom (talk) 21:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: For the logo, just upload the new logo, but don't do the "upload a new version" link on the existing one. Just upload the new one and then change the file name in the infobox. For the other changes, what we usually recommend is to post the proposed language here on the talk page so people can vet it first. Thanks for the disclosure. Aboutmovies (talk) 07:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits to post and logo?  

message: A fair number of editors are long term single purpose accounts. The article also looks fluffy. Undisclosed public relations and promotional activity is suspected and I would like to have the tag remain until the fluffiness is completely removed. Graywalls (talk) 04:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI / UPE
Talk:Stanoje Glavaš

message: I am searching for an image of Stanoje Glavaš, a xylograph by Đura Jakšić from his work Stanoje Glavaš. The image has no copyright (100 years). a bad copy is found at Vesti Online (article). --Zoupan (talk) 04:35, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Uploaded at commons.--Zoupan 18:52, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Template talk:University of California, Davis

message: ----
See my post on Template talk:University of California, Davis
--Vince 08:16, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Would it be better to change student media to student life so we can include things like the  Band-uh! or Unitrans? Nguyenmdk 06:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By all means, change it and include whatever you see fit.  The "student media" thing is a relic of its predecessor (UCSC's template is divided into "Schools & Colleges," "Research and Services" {where I put UCSC's student-life related stuff}, and "Student Media," currently with three entries, but left separate from everything else in anticipation of a lot more entries to be written at a later date). --Dynaflow 06:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, also, I've come out with a new version of the template upon which this one was based, which is more in line with the pan-UC one I created earlier today.  The new UCSC template and its coding can be found here: Template:University of California, Santa Cruz --Dynaflow 06:56, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student Media to Student Life 

message: should an athletics section be added?  it could encompass GunRock, Paviollion,Aggie Stadium, Snowboard & SKi Team, or something, or should that be blended into 'Campus?' other possiblities include causeway classic, battle for the golden horsehow, etc.?
70.133.76.83 (talk) 22:33, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding athletics?