Talk:British Columbia Highway 1

message: Highway 1 is not a provincial highway. As the TCH, it is a federal highway.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by A.L. (talk • contribs) 16:04, 26 July 2006.
:In Canada, roads and highways fall under the authority of provincial governments (as does health care and education for example); hence the designation as provincial highways. --Qyd 16:12, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True: But even in the US, each state has jurisdiction over the sections of interstates inside their borders. But nobody would refer to the Washington state section of I-5 as "Washington State Highway 5." I can see the Ontario and Quebec sections as being provincial highways, as they post provincial hwy. sheilds along the TCH alongside--inconsistently placed, and numberless--TCH signs, and use their own numbers within their borders, but in western Canada, that's not the case, as there is an interprovincial numbering/signage system in place. A.L.--70.24.71.154 16:16, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Provincial" highway 1? 

message: I've never actually used it, but I believe that not only is the only onramp on the westbound side, but the only offramp headed east as well. I'm not sure of a good way to describe this in the bullet points, but it merits mention, I believe. Currently it seems like it's a full interchange, but you can only enter the westbound lanes if you're headed south on 192st, which is definitely not the case.Ktims 01:36, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Exit 57 (192st Surrey)

message: This is a great article. Well written and informative. But there's no references or footnotes.. just one external link.. so it fails B-class criteria unfortunately. OlEnglish (talk) 03:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  B class? 

message: I have set up a new page tab system that will move the exit list to a new tab; this may help increase a reader's focus onto the main article while still being able to obtain access to an exit list, if necessary.  This will also speed up page loading times, since half the article (and content) just got moved to a separate location.
Might also set this up with other highways around the province, especially those featuring very long exit lists.
- Deltanalliance (talk) 07:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, I've had to revert the tab setup. As far as I can tell, the template is not intended for use in articles. Your implementation here was the only instance in article space using it. (IIRC, the style guide also prohibits article sub-pages.) Other options might be to collapse the template, so that readers can open it as desired.  --Ckatzchatspy 08:47, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Or split into a separate list. btw, I thought subpages were supposed to be disabled in the article namespace? -- OlEnglish (Talk) 23:58, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tab System

message: I founded by luck on the following links http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showpost.php?p=5737743&postcount=3353 http://www.michaeldecourcy.com/background-vancouver/project.htm some vintage pictures showing TCH-401 signs.
(Sd-100 (talk) 20:40, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vintage BC-401 (or TCH-401) pictures

message: Substituted at 10:20, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: The measurement of distances along the highway to the nearest 0.01 km (10 metres) seems excessively precise to me.  Anyone happen to know if this is based on a style guide or similar?  I would propose modifying that to the nearest 0.1 km only (100 metres) which seems like a more reasonably level of precision.  Musser (talk) 19:47, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Measurement precision