Talk:Hurricane Daniel (2006)

message: In the words of Mitchazenia-"It's Hink's writing." Juliancolton (talk) (Happy New Year!) 14:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Relisted due to improper GA passing. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt you will, but if you want, I can review it again, and this time the right way. I tried to do it last time, but my computer crashed halfway trough the process. I will make sure to stay away from reviewing if you want. Grrr-Do I do anything right? Juliancolton (talk) (Happy New Year!) 18:41, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, but I'd rather have another user review it, so there is a more widespread view. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA passed

message: This is a good article, and I am willing to  pass this article on the basis that references in the lead will either not be seen as relevant or will be improved by the nominatin editor. If you feel this review was in error, feel free to take it to good article reassessment. Well done to the editors involved. Rt. 18:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: General comments

message: Although I'm not doubting whether or not the name was proposed, my question is whether or not the source in the article was to sum up the name "Daniel" and all associated storms or just this one. I ask this because no less than FOUR storms named "Daniel" came close to or affected Hawaii (1982's passed northward through the islands, 1994's dissipated just southeast of the Big Island, 2000's veered north of the islands but still triggered heavy surf, and this one's remnants caused damage to the islands). I'll guess that 1994's was the first possible in the request, because of the request to retire Emilia and Gilma (none of which neared the islands since 1994 while 2000s John did) as well as 2000's Fausto (the only storm with that name to come near the islands), which did nothing from what I know other than the reformation. Should we keep the source here, but mention it didn't specify whether or not it was this Daniel, switch it to Daniel's disamg. page, or add it to any other potential Daniel pages (such as a possible Hurricane Daniel (2000) should one ever be made)? Hurricane Angel Saki (talk) 02:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ugh, I was waiting for this to come up. OK. There was a previous link that said CPHC requested the retirement of Daniel because of both the 2006 storm and the 2000 storm. However, the link went dead, with no replacement by the WMO, nor any links in the Wayback machine. This link was for the 60th meeting, and this link has been prepared for the 62nd link. So, it was both, in a sense. At the very least, the name was still requested to be removed, as supported by the link, which is still relevant to this article. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 61st Hurricane Meeting Request For Daniel 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Hurricane Daniel (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ofcm.gov/ihc07/web-61st-IHC-Booklet.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:53, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hurricane Daniel (2006). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120209180626/http://elists.pdc.org/pipermail/emops/2006-July.txt to http://elists.pdc.org/pipermail/emops/2006-July.txt
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080910161627/http://www.weather.gov/directives/sym/pd01006006curr.pdf to http://www.weather.gov/directives/sym/pd01006006curr.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified