Talk:Weezer (Blue Album)

message: why is the fuzzy bass mentioned if it's not added through a pedal? --liam 02:45, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pedal question

message: I'm having this go through a Good article review User:cowbellcity45
:Hi cowbell.  I think you were looking for Wikipedia:Good article candidates.  At Good Article reviews we re-review old GA and disputed GAs to see if they still fit the criteria.  To get an article granted GA status, you should go to the candidates page.  I know the name is confusing, we're probably gonna change that soon.  So in the meantime I hope you don't mind me taking the Weezer listing off the review page.  Good luck though. Drewcifer 05:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. / edg ☺ ★ 06:55, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article Review

message: I've assessed the article as B as it contains an impressive array of references. It has a slightly stubby feel in places, and, as someone identified, lacks a reception section. For future reference, GAC is not the place to request a rating: it's the place for good article candidates. One of the easiest ways to request a rating is to blank the rating field in the project templates. Good luck with it. The JPStalk to me 15:14, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixes needed: a couple of MOS problems. Album and magazine titles should be italicised. I'd merge the first two reception sections into one: usually best to avoid sections of only one paragraph. Consider, also, writing the most notable awards/accolades into prose. Good work, though. The JPStalk to me 07:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating

message: An excellent all round article, I've passed it.  Here are some suggestions on moving towards FA.
*The lead could do with refs - it's optional, but I advise it.
*IGN professional review should use the review template (rather then (9.0/10)).
* - Where's the review?
*You don't really need a section on the band's history - save that for their article.
*All URLs accessed on February 5, 2007 UTC - Add this to the accessdate parameter in  instead.
*Album section - Put the refs over the numbers, it looks better.
*I don't think you need charting for singles - save that for their articles.
Anyways, congrats on the GA! Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yay!  cowbellcity45   talk  05:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA passed

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, if the article was Ferdinand Magellan, instead of using the heading ==Magellan's journey==, use ==Journey==.[?]
*As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 07:35, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Automated peer review

message: The B sides information was removed.  Has it been moved somewhere I'm not finding?  I feel this is important information.B sides 14:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  B side (Mykel and Carli) 

message: "The album was well received by critics on its release,[27] Allmusic gave the album 5 stars explaining..."
The allmusic review was written in retrospect, not at the album release, so it doesn't belong in the initial reception section. Rm999 (talk) 03:14, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And the Allmusic review also states that it wasn't universally well-regarded, which contradicts the statement "well received by critics on its release".  The Christgau Consumer Guide Review rating is neutral with no prose, which is certainly not positive. -- J. Wong (talk) 20:41, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allmusic review 

message: Here's a really thorough write-up about the creation of the cover art. If someone is interested, this would be a good addition to the article. One note that might not be clear on the first read, is that the art was insipired by the cassette cover of the Beach Boy's Do it Again compilation, not the LP version, and not the song "Do It Again". ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 16:58, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article detailing the creation of the cover art 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Weezer (1994 album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.weezer.com/info/tunes/index.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.blender.com/guide/67144/500-cds-you-must-own-alternative-rock.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:13, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Weezer (1994 album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070626050454/http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.com/charts/1995-02-04/billboard-200
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140715053900/http://www.guitarworld.com/superunknown-50-iconic-albums-defined-1994 to http://www.guitarworld.com/superunknown-50-iconic-albums-defined-1994
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Weezer (1994 album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.metalsludge.tv/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=138043&highlight=sales&sid=4acc64c3baa32ccf36c5ac21049a232c
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080321032555/http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/01/180332.php to http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/07/01/180332.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023195032/http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/feature/36737-staff-list-top-100-albums-of-the-1990s/page_8 to http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/feature/36737-staff-list-top-100-albums-of-the-1990s/page_8
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111005231838/http://weezer-lyrics.com/weezer-the-blue-album/ to http://weezer-lyrics.com/weezer-the-blue-album/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Weezer (January 2019 album) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 20:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress