lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of World War II aces from Australia

message: The presentation of this list has been enhanced immensely by recent edits. However, I think significant improvement would be found in forming the lists into a single, sortable table, rather than the current presentation under separate subheadings by the letter their surname begins with. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 03:09, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I think that would be a good plan. Perhaps like: List of World War I aces from Australia? Anotherclown (talk) 04:57, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Next month maybe... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 05:10, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Certainly no rush Ian. The work you have done recently is a massive improvement! Anotherclown (talk) 05:13, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with Anotherclown on both accounts. The World War I list is quite a good model to use. Though I do know lists can be quite fiddly and time consuming, so defintely no rush is needed. Just give me a yell if you want or need any help. :) Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 06:09, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Tks guys, much appreciated. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 06:18, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collapse into single sortable list 
Talk:List of World War II aces from Austria

message: http://aces.safarikovi.org/victories/austria-ww2-raf.html gives three Austrians who flew for the RAF and became aces. One Anglo-Austrian born in Berlin, one Jewish refugee from Linz and one Austrian diplomat's son born in Rome. Just to make life more interesting  - the middle one was an air gunner on Defiants. GraemeLeggett (talk) 20:17, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Austrians that flew with RAF
Talk:Raleigh Kirby Godsey

message: Is this gent really notable? This page has the feel of an advertisment for the institution he serves.--Shtove 22:18, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is completely unsourced and unreferenced. It needs sourcing extensive rewriting to bring it unto conformity with WP:MOS. I am severely tempted to down rate it to a STUB.  EraserGirl (talk) 16:12, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced
Talk:Patrica Ndogu

message: Google search shows either Patrica or Patricia - and the multiple instances of Patrica may have been copied from the :m:Patrica Ndogu page since it was created in 2006. This needs confirmation on her pages and in Wikidata :d:Q7145364. -- Deborahjay (talk) 15:41, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of first name
Talk:Hosea Williams

message: There is a continuing controversy over Forsythe County and thelack of sourcing severely damages this article.
The 2000 census as noted on wikipedia lists Forsythe as being 95 percent white, but within that only a fraction of one percent were black. There were probably 4 times as many Asians and Pacific Islanders as black people. That does not represent the etnically diverse community that this piece claims. 
69.120.49.117 22:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article needs more material on Williams' civil rights activism; both for his work in SCLC and close association with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and his later work in the Atlanta area. 'Hosea Feed the Hungry' needs to be fleshed out a bit. A lead image of Williams is needed. With more text, a least two more images of Williams in a civil rights context would be a good addition. Wikimedia Commons is weak on images of the broader civil rights movement in the US. - Neonorange (talk) 04:31, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More material needed for sections on Williams' civil rights activism 
Talk:FA Youth Cup Finals

message: I have just removed wikilinks to the surname "English" in the Man United 1956/57 squad listings. English is a disambiguation page and should not be linked to directly; none of the dab targets on that page seemed to correspond to the footballer in question, so I simply removed the wikilinks. If anyone knows the player's first name, it would probably be a good idea to add it to the listings, although WP:N should be kept in mind if you want to wikilink the result. Thanks. --Tkynerd 22:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1956/57 (English)
Talk:Flight instructor

message: Clean-up tag removed.  Articles on aviation regulation on Wikipedia are fraught with problems because each jurisdiction does things differently, and one particular jurisdiction has by far the largest share of aviators and first-language English-speakers, and they frequently tend to write articles in a non-globalized manner.  HOWEVER, considering all this, this particular article isn't really that bad.BaseTurnComplete 22:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

message: This whole paragraph is stupid. Pilots love semantic arguments, but I think this whole section should be deleted in favor of simple parenthetical near the introduction... "A certificated flight instructor (also commonly referred to as a certified flight instructor)
Yes, there is no such thing as a private pilot LICENSE, but who cares, that is the common vernacular. Pilots all think they are lawyers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.182.36.37 (talk) 09:06, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Certified VS Certificated
Talk:Tram system

message: Please! this is really getting confusing
Do we need another Tram Page?
Do we really need to Split  Tram?
Do we really need Two (2)  Tram Articles! 
Please read discussion about the merge on the light rail talk:
“Merges with Light Rail / Fusion of Light Rail and Tram”
 Talk:Light rail#Merges with Trams L blue l 02:56, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A tram is a type of vehicle; a tram system is the system that it runs along. Railroad is about a type of system, while railcar ond other articles are about the vehicles. --NE2 16:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the split as this will clear some confusion and duplications of information on the Trams page and Light Rail page.   L blue l 02:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, this article shouldn't exist. "Tram" is a transportation mode, not specifically a vehicle, and this duplicates information. I may merge it back. If the Tram article needs to be shortened, the history section can be cut, as there is already a history article. ProhibitOnions (T) 08:17, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't merge it back. A tram is specifically a vehicle:  --NE2 12:44, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we really need to Split  [[Tram]] to [[Tram system]] 
Talk:Peaceful Revolution

message: There are two serious errors with this article: first, it states that Gorbachev came to power in 1953 instead of 1985; second, it suggests that East Germany and Hungary had a common border. I'm hesitant to correct these myself, as I'm not sure of the intention of the original author. Deregnaucourt (talk) 10:23, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with timing and geograpy 

message: Citations needed in this page - hardly anything is referenced! Have made a start, will come back and add more references when I get a moment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gipple (talk • contribs) 09:18, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of references

message: Both articles are about the exact same sequence of events, with a lot of overlap. Peaceful revolution (German) looks at the issue from a bit more grander point of view, whereas Monday demonstrations in East Germany focuses on the ground level events. In any case, they should be merged. 89.27.11.236 (talk) 22:50, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree, this can easily stay separate with a bit more work, and until then, there's little to be lost by keeping them. Ingolfson (talk) 11:43, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

text: Disagree, the events in Leipzig are, as a focal point of the broader movement, important enough to warrant a separate article. User:Gerard De Beuckelaer  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.179.81.93 (talk) 12:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

text: Oppose, per Ingolfson.  Cs32en Talk to me  14:58, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Strongly support, per 89.27.11.236. Charles Essie (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Why the hell is the introductory text duplicated? --168.103.229.195 (talk) 04:06, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication
Talk:List of World War II aces from South Africa

message: Does anyone know what the * and ** next to some of the awards refers to? It looks as if this is left over from the source of this information.
BoonDock (talk) 18:30, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here to ask the exact same question - they appear to relate to the awards.  Possibly whether the award was bestowed by the SAAF or by the RAF.  Not sure!  If we don't get a reply in coming weeks, I recommend we delete them.  Farawayman (talk) 16:34, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: After navigating to the article page of some of the pilots who have these marks next to their awards - I suspect * means "and Bar" and ** means "Bar awarded twice" - needs confirmation, but makes sense.  Farawayman (talk) 16:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of asterisks

message: This SA Military History Society article includes Charles Green - http://www.samilitaryhistory.org/vol017dt.html - but he isn't included in the list Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Charles Green
Talk:Terrebonne

message: the Terrebonne entry of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrebonne lists two North American locations using that Terrebonne name.  A third is in use, however, in Louisiana, and is the name of a "parish" (county).
Wikipedia already has record of this Terrebonne parish location (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrebonne_Parish,_Louisiana), but does not include it in the first entry specified.
75.176.181.251 22:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Reichsrat (Germany)

message: ♠The third paragraph states:
So in effect, bills vetoed by the Reichstag very frequently died.
But isn't the point that the Reichsrat had the power to veto the legislation of the Reichstag? Thus in the sentence from the article that is quoted above, it seems like Reichstag is a mistake and it should instead read Reichsrat, i.e. if the Reichsrat vetoed a bill it was difficult to get the supermajority needed in the Reichstag to override that veto.♠  SixBlueFish (talk) 20:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reichstag v. Reichsrat

message: I kept none of the English-language article because it had no significant material that isn't in the German version, and there were places where I think it was a bit off-base, such as comparing the Reichsrat to the English House of Lords. I added a number of new references to the German article, including all of the direct references to article numbers in the Weimar constitution.
Feedback welcomed here or on my talk page.  GHStPaulMN (talk) 23:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of German-language article 6 Nov 2022
Talk:German Federal Republic

message: Shouldn't this be a redirect to West Germany? --Bray (talk) 01:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect? 

message: How is is derogatory?   Aar  ►  02:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: it is more that it was seen as derogatory by (parts? of) the government of the Federal Republic of Germany (because of the change of word order)134.3.76.108 (talk) 12:32, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused.
Talk:Rundfunk im amerikanischen Sektor

message: Could we have some info about the apparently short lived (1989-1992) RIAS Television channel ? 86.112.238.24 (talk) 17:59, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: RIAS TV

message: "after the Soviets had refused to provide air time on the Berliner Rundfunk radio station"
Did the Soviets not offer six hours per day (Two each to the French, British and Americans) airtime but the Western Allies felt this insufficient when the Soviets had up to eighteen ? 109.144.221.170 (talk) 22:37, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berliner Rundfunk
Talk:Marsi (Germanic tribe)

message: Marsberg and Obermarsberg mean the same town. And during the Dark Ages they were called Eresburg and Heresburg. Later scholars interpreted Eres- as the greek god Ares and used the better known Roman god Mars to name the newly founded city at this place. But to the people it was known as Stadtberge. In the local dialect it still bears this name. Greetings --Namensknappheit (talk) 21:37, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  And Volkmarsen derives from Volkmarshausen, which means 'houses or settlement of Volkmar', Volkmar being a male name. German place names with '-hausen' are from the early middle ages. Greetings --Namensknappheit (talk) 07:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marsberg and Obermarsberg
Talk:German East Africa Company

message: It's probably an effect of the students working on it, but the article has major tone issues. There seems to be half a biography in the middle of the lead; the rest of the article is mostly a pastiche of biographies with (ironic) filler lines like ... "although most of the credit for founding the company and colony is given to a select number of people, none of it would be possible without the collective efforts of everyone in the company"; and various other issues like divergent spellings of names.
One place to start a cleanup would be the 1911 EB article, although some of the present sources could also be salvaged. — LlywelynII 19:33, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone

message: This paragraph tries to give some background but is full of mistakes and erroneous references. Germany never had 20 mio immigrants in the 1900s (unreferenced claim), the fashion of hunting had nothing to do with colonial policy, Schmoller as a significant representative of the navy campaign in Germany should at least be referenced, and German Imperialism being conceived in the 1850s , i.e. 20 years before German unification, looks nonsensical.Kipala (talk) 07:02, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Founding
Talk:Vladimir Semyonov (politician)

message: Would an interview with Vladimir Semyonovich Semyonov from 1986 be useful here as an external link? Focus of conversation is nuclear weapons policy. http://openvault.wgbh.org/catalog/V_3970929F759C433EB5ADA506B023F339 (I helped with the site, so it would be conflict of interest for me to just add it.) Mccallucc (talk) 16:44, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link to interview on nuclear policy?
Talk:Thena (MC2)

message: Perhaps this should be merged with the main article on Thena? or maybe that should be merged with this, as the new Thena would probably be more searched for than the old character. 
I wanted to put a picture on but i'm not sure on the legality of just putting a pic from the net on here. Do I need Marvel's permission? Wordforge 22:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:List of World War II aces from Spain

message: Are these not Spanish Civil War aces?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.91.1.41 (talk) 10:16, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are. Take into account that many Republican airmen -like Meroño and Zarauza- sought shelter in the USSR, and they took part in the war against Germany. Franco's Spain, on the other hand, deployed the so-called Blue Squadrons (for instance, Salas Larrazábal fought in Spain in 1936-39 and in Russia in c.1942). One anachronism: the American Tinker -a former American naval officer and flyer- killed himself in 1939, so he couldn't shot anything down in WW2. Have a try with his mate in Spain "Ajax" Baumler.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.142.175.22 (talk) 11:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Air victories in the Spanish Civil War are not included on this list. The Blue Squadron was attached to the  Luftwaffe's JG51 "Moelders", at least in early 1943. Don't look at me, I'm Republican.
:::::Captain Hevia_12 "kills"/// Major Cuadra _10///Captain Gavilán & Lieutenant Sánchez Arjona_9 (Arjona was killed in an accident on 19 November 1943)///Ensign or Second Lieutenant Aldecoa_8 (after the war Aldecoa became a stunt flyer of international repute, and was killed in an accident in the 1950s)///Major Salas & Captain Arango_7///Lieutenants Sánchez Tabernero, Lucas, Meneses, Valiente & Azqueta_6///Captain Alós_5.
:Source: Magazines "Historia y Vida" (#47, Feb.1972, page 6) and "Avión Revue" (#112, Oct.1991,p.57).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.142.175.22 (talk) 09:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Note:The Spanish Wikipedia article on the "Escuadrilla Azul" includes Aldós (with 6 "kills"),& Bengoa & Mateos (with 5 each). Alós became Herrero Alós.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.142.175.22 (talk) 09:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 13 Aces of the Blue Squadron
Talk:Edler

message: An Edler would be the equivalent of an armigerous esquire not a baronet. In fact an Edler ranks below a Ritter (German Knight), so I have removed that sentence. The following equivalencies would be more approximate (not necessarily precisely so) in my opinion:
Von = (noble) Gentleman
Edler = (noble) Esquire
Ritter (non-hereditary) = Knight 
Ritter (hereditary) = Baronet
Baron = no UK equivalent, except maybe a Scottish feudal baron
Freiherr = UK peerage Baron/Lord of Parliament
121.73.7.84 (talk) 10:42, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edler does not equal Baronet 

message: :Category:German noble titles is itself a category within :Category:Noble titles by nation which is in turn a category within :Category:Noble titles. — Robert Greer (talk) 15:13, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Noble titles]] ''vs.'' [[:Category:Noble titles by nation]] ''vs.'' [[:Category:German noble titles]] 

message: Was this distiction heritable, or did it apply only to the original recipient?  Jheald (talk) 11:13, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heritable ? 

message: Most of the above is nonsense, and comes from trying to approximate the German (and Continental) systems of Nobility with the quite different British system. Edler is completely different from Edler Herr. Edler is not considered a title at all, but is an augmentation of the status of an untitled noble, albeit a hereditary one. The same pertains to a German hereditary Knight. Edlers are not just southern German and Austrian, but also Saxon. Edler Herr is a title equivalent to Freiherr, both equivalent to Baron. A Baronet is not a noble, but is a hereditary distinction invented by an English king to augment his treasury.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.143.49.235 (talk) 22:37, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Quatsch

message: The text discusses "von" but the example given uses "zu"? Is there a difference? 63.82.23.2 (talk) 16:13, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Von = Zu?
Talk:Re-Constriction Records discography

message: I entered the information as accurately as I could, however I do not own and have never owned every one of the albums much less the rarer demos and promos, so if anyone can double check the years that would be greatly appreciated.  I find it hard to believe some of them were released in 2000 in-between two releases in 1997 etc.  The 10* Year Anniversary is an exception, they mailed that out in 1996 and noted they had only been around 5 years, so a bit of a marketing plan or a joke not sure which.  Der.Gray 22:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Dates
Talk:Francis William Reitz

message: Congratulations on achieving Good Article status. This article is well written and gives comprehensive information about a relevant historical figure from South Africa. Nice and rare photographs added, good links to Wikisource. Makeshift Thackery (talk) 08:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA status 
Talk:Bielsko-Biała

message: Seems wildly exagerated  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.50.99.110 (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Metro Area 5million?

message: Failed for WPPOLAND due to insufficient inline cites and lacking coverage (no section on economy, for example). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:38, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class
Talk:Imperial County of Ortenburg

message: Ortenburg-Neuortenburg doesn't exist so long. After the death of Henry V. it got again part of Ortenburg. Sebsatian I. was the next emperor of the hole county of Ortenburg.
--84.145.224.68 19:21, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Ortenburg-Neu-Ortenburg was part of the county Ortenburg! The Possession was devided between different lines, like Alt-Ortenburg, Dorfbach, etc. But the Count of Ortenburg always changed between the lines, always the oldest of the monarchy was allowed to be the count! The counts of Ortenburg in Carinthia weren't a branch of Orteburg, they've never been any relationship between the Countys, but the bavarian counts hopped so, to get the Possession of them. I found on the germen Wikipedia some sites for the counts and the county, look here:  
If someone can translate it, we could get here a very fine article.  --84.145.244.156 (talk) 16:26, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not fluent in German but the links you provided suggests to me that the Ortenburgs of Carinthia are related to the Ortenburgs of present day Bavaria.  If you can point me to the section that implys no conection I would be happy to reread.--CSvBibra (talk) 23:00, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are two other german articles about that. One is for the county in Carinthia, where stands, that the only joint possession and relationship of the counties was their name. Look here . The other article  is about the inheritance fight of the bavarian counts to get the ownerless county in Carinthia since the middle of the 15th century. Sorry for my bad english, I'm not a native speaker. --84.145.194.7 (talk) 07:35, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German-Wiki 

message: Hello, we should rename or move this article to an other name. Ortenburg-Neuortenburg was a branch of the 'House of Ortenburg', but not the county! The county itself was only called Ortenburg and before 1531 Ortenberg. Furthermore was the House of Ortenburg a branch of the House of Sponheim. We also must consider, that in Carinthia also was a county with the name 'Ortenburg'. Both counties didn't have any togetherness! Could anybody help? --Ortenburger 鼠 20:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, the Name Ortenburg-Neuortenburg is wrong, it was only th name of a branch of the House of Ortenburg. Should we perhaps use the name in the Infobox Imperial County of Ortenburg? It is the only correct one for the former county. --Ortenburger 鼠 06:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename/Move
Talk:Non-Commissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon

message: This topic is about a specific ribbon, not a generic ribbon. It seems appropriate that since it is a US award, the US spelling of the specific ribbon is appropriate.
184.6.178.177 (talk) 01:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-commissioned vs. Noncommissioned

message: : Page Moved per discussion below and this ref. Station1 (talk) 20:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Chorzów

message: Quickfail due to insufficient inline reference density. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: B-class review

message: The description of Chorzów´s "history" here is only the Polish view and mostly - propaganda.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.211.186.88 (talk) 13:20, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propaganda 

message: "Heiduck), which locally meant bandits." See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajduk  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9E8:20D0:E000:D0D1:1201:422A:EFA6 (talk) 13:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  die Heiducken
Talk:Andries Waterboer

message: I suspect that the photograph shown in this article on Andries Waterboer, which is captioned merely "Waterboer and his sons", depicts not Andries Waterboer (who died in 1853) but rather his son Nicolaas Waterboer. Compare this photograph:
Blarcrean (talk) 14:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph shows Andries or Nicolaas Waterboer?