Talk:Good Morning Revival

message: I'm seeing this track represented differently from different sources, MusicBrainz has it as Break Her Heart, and depending on the listing amazon has it both ways.  What's the verdict? --70.152.196.31 13:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Break Her Heart track name 

message: I've failed this article for GA status.  This article is not stable; the album was only released a month ago.  The lead is way too big, and most of the information in it should be contained under article headers.  The article doesn't discuss the album's reception by music critics at all.  The album cover has no fair use rationale and even states "This is a high Resolution Picture", which violates our fair use policy.  The covers of the singles should not be in this article, and the information about them should be prose rather than a table.  ShadowHalo 07:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA

message: In light of the recent edits removing and re-adding the "Reception" section, I have some suggestions editorial suggestions.  My main concern with the current text is that I think it gives undue weight to the negative reviews as compared to the positive reviews.
*"The album received mixed reviews.  The Guardian, NME and All Music Guide, for example, regarded it poorly, while Kerrang!, JAM!, Rock Sound and Teraz Rock gave good reviews."
*"The reaction of listeners to the album was mixed.  The Guardian, NME and All Music Guide, for example, gave negative reviews.  NME went so far as to say, "Go in with absolutely no expectations. Not even low expectations. Nothing."  Meanwhile, Kerrang!, JAM!, Rock Sound and Teraz Rock gave positive reviews.".
Note that I cannot verify all of the reviews.  Some of them come from this diff [ (link)], which may or may not be an accurate characterisation of the reviews.  Anyone got comments or suggestions?  :)  Cheers, Iamunknown 01:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is one problem.  I don't know.  Most of the organizations cited as positively reviewing the album are magazines, which might be difficult to get a hold of.  It could be possible, though, so I don't think we should rule it out yet.  :)  If we find some positive reviews, though, would you be okay with characterising the reception of the album as "mixed reviews"?  Thanks, Iamunknown 00:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Tagged it for unbalanced viewpoints. A general Google query reveals some positive comments regarding the album release. The professional reviews is also an indicator of that, and the mention of a wholly negative viewpoint is rather disparaging. More sources can be found within the professional reviews, so finding citations is not an issue here.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 05:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the "Reception" section 

message: It still needs a bigger lead and the references should be using the cite web template. I hope this helps. Spiderone 17:11, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  To become a GA 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Good Morning Revival's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Billboard":
From The Young and the Hopeless: 
From Avenged Sevenfold: "Eagles Fly Past Britney to Debut at No. 1", Billboard.com, November 7, 2007.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Good Morning Revival]] 

message: Edit at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Good_Morning_Revival&diff=314069502&oldid=314069102 shows a user falsifying professional reviews (changing correct ratings to incorrect ratings). Tevi (talk) 21:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing falsifications 

message: Why has this article got two tables of chart positions?  Why do the two tables not agree with each other on positions attained in many countries?  Skinsmoke (talk) 12:09, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart positions 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Good Morning Revival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090504023144/http://goodcharlotte.com:80/profiles/blogs/i-dont-twitter to http://www.goodcharlotte.com/profiles/blogs/i-dont-twitter
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070316015249/http://www.ariacharts.com.au:80/pages/charts_display.asp?chart=1A50 to http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display.asp?chart=1A50
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090620002022/http://www.ifpi.gr:80/chart04.htm to http://www.ifpi.gr/chart04.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:36, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Good Morning Revival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090415000451/http://www.capif.org.ar:80/Default.asp?CodOp=ESCS&CO=6 to http://www.capif.org.ar/Default.asp?CodOp=ESCS&CO=6
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070328172437/http://www.mahasz.hu:80/m/?menu=slagerlistak&menu2=archivum to http://www.mahasz.hu/m/?menu=slagerlistak&menu2=archivum
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090208011800/http://www.bpi.co.uk/platinum/platinum.html to http://www.bpi.co.uk/platinum/platinum.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070715092719/http://musicbox.sonybmg.com:80/good_charlotte/keep_your_hands_off_my_girl to http://musicbox.sonybmg.com/good_charlotte/keep_your_hands_off_my_girl
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070711092127/http://musicbox.sonybmg.com:80/good_charlotte/the_river to http://musicbox.sonybmg.com/good_charlotte/the_river
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070315003221/http://musicbox.sonybmg.com:80/good_charlotte/keep_your_hands_off_my_girl_0 to http://musicbox.sonybmg.com/good_charlotte/keep_your_hands_off_my_girl_0
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Good Morning Revival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081206172603/http://www.billboard.com:80/bbcom/esearch/searchResult.jsp?keyword=Green+Day&x=0&y=0&exposeNavigation=true&applicationName=bbcom&matchType=mode%2Bmatchallpartial&rangePropertyName=FORMATTED_DATE&rangeFilterType=BTWN to http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/searchResult.jsp?keyword=Green+Day&x=0&y=0&exposeNavigation=true&applicationName=bbcom&matchType=mode%2Bmatchallpartial&rangePropertyName=FORMATTED_DATE&rangeFilterType=BTWN
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 11 external links on Good Morning Revival. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://blender.com/guide/reviews.aspx?id=4440
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.drownedinsound.com/release/view/9788
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/13885772/review/13891169/good_morning_revival
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ew.com/ew/gallery/0%2C%2C20166853_20383571%2C00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090209033817/http://australian-charts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Green+Day&titel=American+Idiot&cat=a to http://australian-charts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Green+Day&titel=American+Idiot&cat=a
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/searchResult.jsp?keyword=Green+Day&x=0&y=0&exposeNavigation=true&applicationName=bbcom&matchType=mode+matchallpartial&rangePropertyName=FORMATTED_DATE&rangeFilterType=BTWN
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100704185106/http://www.cria.ca/cert_db_search.php to http://www.cria.ca/cert_db_search.php
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ifpi.se/wp/wp-content/uploads/ar-20033.pdf
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5hGWCuqaE?url=http://www.chartstats.com to http://www.chartstats.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081204021518/http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart.asp to http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304190545/http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/certification-award-levels.pdf to http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/certification-award-levels.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified