Talk:Wikispecies

message: There is a tag that this stub lacks sources - this might help: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikispecies
Not sure if this is sufficient. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.111.8.96 (talk) 22:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source required?

message: I moved the article back to the main namespace and changed the redirects.  This is in line with the rest of the articles in :Category:Wikimedia projects.  References to Wikispecies should stay in the main namespace unless they want to cross over to the dark side ;). ∴ here…♠ 01:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Namespace

message: For example to answer question what makes Wikispecies different from a biology-limited Wikipedia?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 06:06, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, more information and clarification is needed, but to answer your example question - Currently, Wikispecies is strictly limited to taxonomic hierarchies and the references which justify them, although interwiki links, images (only one allowed per page), and vernacular names are also included on some pages to better integrate with other Wikimedia projects.  Prose and lengthy descriptive content is not included and belongs on the language-specific Wikipedias --Georgeryp 06:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More info needed

message: At one time, wasn't the logo for Wikispecies a bee?
That's what I wonder. Think it was around 2004 that it was the project's logo. Not sure about what happened to it. It would help if someone has a copy of that image.
:You're right, here we go:  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.232.66.25 (talk) 16:13, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo

message: Templates section has selfrefs - should be easy to fix SP-KP 16:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to…) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. (which is impossible, since I already did so) Ucucha 17:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup tag 

message: Not to be overly pedantic, but wouldn't this technically imply that the project was launched on 13 September 2004, and not the 14th? (First edit of Main Page was made at 22:06 UTC on 13 September 2004.) Incidentally, if you look at the revision itself, it might shed some light on the discussion in the previous section. - dcljr (talk) 10:43, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The editor responsible for that first edit is German. Germany apparently was observing daylight savings time on 13/14 September 2004. Local time for that edit would thus have been UTC+2, 00:06 14 September 2004. Plantdrew (talk) 17:26, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Launch date 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:23, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion