lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peter DeRose

message: Why is it spelled like that here?  Isn't it "de Rose"?  You'd think getting the name of the subject of the article right would be a priority. --82.93.10.238 12:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: DeRose is used here. Klbrain (talk) 10:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "DeRose"? 

message: The name of the song is Deep Purple, not When the Deep Purple Falls.  This is confirmed by all the web references I have checked, and both versions of the sheet music I have seen.  "When the" and "falls" were not part of the title of the instrumental publised in the early 30s, but were included in the lyric that Mitch Parrish wrote a few years later.
So I made the change.----Tom Harwick —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.163.0.12 (talk) 03:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  not when the deep 

message: On his headstone, his year of birth is given as 1896 (photo). This is more consistent with his credit as co-writer of "Meet Me in the Land of Grapico" published in 1916. (see Grapico). --Dystopos (talk) 22:47, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Date amended ... seems to have been an issue outstanding for a while ... Klbrain (talk) 09:50, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate
Talk:The Singles Table

message: Is this show will never be aired? It's done. finito. Ditto? Does any network air the show after a year of not showing it? 75.166.47.46 04:11, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this show finished for good?

message: I removed the Future television series template as it does not look like this will see the light of day.
If Fox NBC had any intention of ever airing this, during the writer's strike would be an optimal time, and they have not yet announced this to air. Tingrin87 (talk) 11:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Future Television Series template
Talk:Beware of the Dog (song)

message: Anyone got a feed about any reactions from the fans of the  original song about this?? (note to self: never watch late night TV again) MarekTT 14:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beware of the [[Personal Jesus]] 
Talk:United Air Lines Flight 859

message: I have changed the link to the offical CAB accident report, to one that is now available in PDF form, with only one click of the mouse being required to get there.  The older, html report, required hunting thru DOT pages, and then years, and then thru airlines, to finally get to the desired report.  Also, removed the reference to the NTSB report, since the NTSB did not exist then.  The NTSB first opened its doors in April, 1967.  This accident was investigated by the CAB, not the NTSB.
Also removed the reference to "critical engine."  There is no critical engine in relation to an asymmetrical thrust situation, during jet engine reversing after landing.  "Critical engine" is an aviation concept that related to piston/propeller planes while they were in flight, and the concept really doesn't apply to jet airliners at all, nor to any plane, during the landing rollout. EditorASC (talk) 09:45, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New PDF link

message: Off to the right is the image from the German version of this article.  Is there any reason why this shouldn't be on this article too? -- RobLa (talk) 22:36, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If the DC-8 image were of the accident aircraft itself, it would absolutely belong in the article.  As it stands, the German wikipedia article is larger (~7000 bytes vs. ~5000 for the en version) so it has a bit more room for a third image. If you want to add the image to the right, (keeping the two existing post-crash images of course) I personally won't revert it.  Here's the translated German article in case someone thinks some of it is worth adding to the English version: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/United-Air-Lines-Flug_859 −  Itsfullofstars (talk) 18:47, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I made a cropped version using CropTool that doesn't have the extraneous background, so now it has a smaller screen footprint and looks more centered.  The orignal was left intact. − Itsfullofstars (talk) 23:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and added the image to the infobox, and moved the previous image to the article body. Itsfullofstars (talk) 23:41, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image from German Wikipedia
Talk:Paul Gann

message: The source for my edit is the book Inventing the Aids Virus, by Peter Duesberg, a tenured professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley. His book is endorsed in a forward by Nobel Laureate Kary Mullis. The book was published eight years after Gann’s death, a period in which much was learned about what AIDS is and what it isn’t. Eye.earth (talk) 20:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In those 8 years, AIDS denialists like Peter Duesberg have lost any vestigial credibility that might attach to his academic rank. The book is simply not a reliable nor a notable source for describing someone's cause of death, particularly when contradicted by the New York Times. This biography is not a platform for AIDS-denialist spam or propaganda; that particular fringe already receives its (un)due weight at AIDS reappraisal. If you disagree, please feel free to solicit outside input and raise the issue at the reliable sources noticeboard. MastCell Talk 23:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Another MastCell hissy fit. Another one can be viewed at the bottom of the discussion page for AZT Eye.earth (talk) 17:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah. I take it that means that you're unwilling to solicit outside input, discuss this at the reliable sources noticeboard, or take any other constructive action to resolve this issue? MastCell Talk 18:09, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

text:  MastCell isn't someone normally taken to "hissy fits". MastCell is also correct in regard to the UNDUE weight issues; we aren't going to include an extreme minority viewpoint in an article that is only peripherally related to that. That is the case regardless of whether or not the minority viewpoint is correct. Please read WP:UNDUE. JoshuaZ (talk) 19:07, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Eye.earth, you should refrain from personal attacks.  MastCell is hardly one to engage in hissy fits.  Please read what Joshua has written, and take it to heart.  OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 19:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I think you would be hard-pressed indeed to demonstrate that Peter Duesberg had any credibility in the scientific community at present on the topic of HIV/AIDS. More to the point, your proposal to incorporate this source has been rejected by a number of editors. Please stop re-inserting it; you are free to follow the steps in dispute resolution if you'd like. MastCell Talk 23:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I also agree that per WP:UNDUE, the material the editor Eye.Earth is trying to add should not be added.— Dædαlus Contribs 07:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Order of Simon of Cyrene

message: It would appear that  neither the provincial nor diocesan bodies have an accurate and complete list of members of the order. Please help to keep it up to date and complete. Wayne Jayes (talk) 15:21, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

message: Unfortunately the list is incomplete as neither diocesan or provincial departments were able to provide up-to-date details of the holders of the award.
Wayne Jayes moved Barry Smith's comment once before, and so I will do it again Wayne Jayes (talk) 18:09, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  comment by Barry Smith 
Talk:Orlov Trotter

message: I'm sorry, I had not realized that there was an article about the Orlov Trotter, because in the WikiProject about horse breeds it said it had not been written.  So I wrote one.  The difference between the two articles is the title.  One capitalized the word "Trotter" and one didn't.  So, as a result of that, it was thought that the article about the Orlov Trotter was not written. The Spotted Swans 14:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging, the other article is actually much more extensive, though it needs some work (I corrected the bit that said Orlovs were born gray and turned white!   =:-O  But this capitalization is more correct.  Eventer, can you clean up the categories and make sure this is in the List of horse breeds?Montanabw 05:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 2007 

message: I decided to merge Smetanka here. No content added. Added an anchor for target/landing.  ▶ I am Grorp ◀  00:42, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge/redirect Smetanka
Talk:Human left lung

message: The second paragraph does need some editing (emoticon?).
It would be nice to have a discussion as to why the left lung is smaller than the right (something more substantial than to make room for the heart).
Also why does the left lung only have 2 lobes and not 3 (why not just 3 smaller lobes)?
Should the article include something about the lingula?
140.226.190.83 (talk) 03:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lobes Section
Talk:Lantea

message: Hi.
Where was it stated that the name of the planet is "Lantea", anyway? I always thought it was Atlantis, being named after the city. 74.38.35.171 21:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was never, it should be at "ATLANTIS, PLANET OF" and the only source of the article agrees.--FlammingoHey 03:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, those haven't aired here yet in the USA, but if that's so, I guess then it's right. A silly name, yes, but also, sadly, canon. :( Thanks. mike4ty4 19:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the planet
Talk:Ledyard, Connecticut

message: Could someone verify this edit, please? It was made by an account that's been vandalizing. SamEV (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification request 

message: Please read and understand Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Write the article first before re-adding people to this article. The burden of proof for notability (especially for people) on Wikipedia is very high; it requires multiple substantial independent sources about the person, and it must be clear why the person is notable. Activities like writing local history books and starting a scholarship (and appearing to NPR to talk about it) are far below Wikipedia standards for notability and do not justify adding a person. That is not merely my opinion - that is long-established Wikipedia policy.  pinging you because you've been involved in their similar editing on a different article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people
Talk:Data fusion

message: There's no mention of data fusion in the page for meta-analysis, so should the link really be here? Xpontus 14:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

message: How is Data fusion different from Data integration?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Russianspy3 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Data fusion vs. Data integration
Talk:O'Connor v. Donaldson

message: The article makes claims that there was only an ONGYN on duty and that the only nurse was in the infirmary. Furthermore, no psychiatrist. These are big claims that really change the nature of his hospital stay. I don't see these claims supported in the citations. 73.38.177.57 (talk) 14:00, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: can this article be expanded especially to give more information as to what his needs were and why he was confined? Tydoni (talk) 04:39, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This does not make sense:
" The origins of Donaldson's institutionalization began in 1943, at age 43, when he suffered a trauma episode. He was hospitalized and received treatment, before resuming life with his family. However, in 1950s he developed paranoid delusions, and was committed to the state hospital of Chattahoochee, Florida in 1956. He spent 15 years as a patient; though he did not receive any treatment, actively refusing it, and attempting to secure his release. Throughout his stay he denied he was ever ill, and refused to be put into a half-way house.
In 1956, Kenneth Donaldson, a 48-year-old man from Philadelphia... "
How could he be 43 in 1943 and 48 in 1956?
78.146.211.242 (talk) 18:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsense 

message: Psychiatrist Thomas Szasz wrote a whole book on this court case entitled Psychiatric Slavery. Perhaps it might be good to mention this book here in this article? Michael Ten (talk) 03:35, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention the book Psychiatric Slavery by Thomas Szasz?
Talk:Charles Church, Plymouth

message: The current article size is 38kb, which is longer than the suggested 32kb limit.  I propose that the section on Dr. Robert Hawker be split off to make up its own wikipedia article.  His section seems to have more than enough information (almost 700 words!) to become its own article. Lisatwo 02:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  split article 

message: Should be less like a guide book. Charles Matthews (talk) 10:43, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't sound that bad to me (although a few sections seem a little long or overly detailed).  Could someone be more specific on what tone needs work? RJFJR (talk) 23:27, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone
Talk:Heart of My Heart

message: It seems someone confused the song "(The Gang That Sang) Heart of My Song" with the song usually called "Heart of My Heart" -- whose real title is "The Story of the Rose".  I don't know whether the info about the recordings and author are correct, since that info might refer to the gang that sang instead.
72.183.101.225 14:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about two different songs: "The Story of the Rose", written in 1899 (whose chorus is more popularly known as "Heart of My Heart") and "(The Gang That Sang) Heart of My Heart", written in 1926.  Perhaps these should be on two different pages.  Does anyone have an objection to this? Geipel (talk) 05:00, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Communist Party of Estonia

message: material that used to be here shifted to RSDLP and CPSU. --Soman 14:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some question has emerged on how to deal with parties that were merged into and/or emerged out of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. I suggest a centralized discussion at Talk:Communist_Party_of_the_Soviet_Union#Separate_articles. --Soman 11:08, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not that simple, though. For example, the DLPE, i.e. successor of the 'independent' CPE, got some properties in 1990s that had formerly belonged to the ruling CPE, then branch of the CPSU. So in a way the old CPE continued and reformed itself, the pro-Soviet commies indeed reconstituted themselves, since their faction was so small at the time and it was not regarded as a continuation of the old CPE in 1990-1991. 90.190.166.173 (talk) 17:20, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Template talk:WikiProject New Orleans

message: Can we PLEASE modify with a "noinclude" or something so every article in the "To do" list is no longer included in "What links here" for every article?  I just created an article for Hollygrove, New Orleans, and the checking "What links here" shows page after page (7 or 800 + I'd guess) of talk pages, making checking and modifying links almost unusable.  Thanks, -- Infrogmation 17:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "To do" list links
Talk:Guy's Big Bite

message: Ok...what's with the wrist band on his forarm?
:it's a tribute to his son.  Will incorporate into article.CelticGreen 23:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: this has been moved to the Guy Fieri article. Cactusjump (talk) 17:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

message: Just because you know that "Santa Rosa" is in California, does not mean the average reader does.  Do not abreviate cities, always include the state, not just the city or city nickname.  CelticGreen 23:56, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Cali-isms"

message: The information pertaining strictly to Guy should be moved into his personal article; this article should focus primarily on the show and its content. Willbyr (talk | contribs) 12:28, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Info on Guy
Talk:Donegal Castle

message: As per one version of this article, "The castle was built in 1474 by Hugh Roe O'Donnell"... how can this be when he was not born until at least 1572? He only lived until his early 30s. One castle website indicates the castle was built in 1505 by the O'Donnell family. However according to most references, it appears the castle was built by Hugh Roe O'Donnell's father, Sir Hugh O'Donnell. I would like to see some additions made my researcher of the O'Donnell Clan, especially since this is important to people such as me whose family originated from Co. Donegal. 15:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cofusion With Castler Builder/Dates... 
Template talk:Personal finance

message: There are alternative credit card images that could be used for the top of this template, such as the ones in :Category:Credit cards and :Category:Credit Card Cover. I would suggest maybe this one, because it doesn't have the awkward chip displayed next to the cards. --Crocodile Punter 15:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

message: On this template, the Financial Planning link is actually to Financial Planner, and Financial Adviser is an occupation, not an integral part of personal finance. I'm not sure why Financial Adviser is here, or why Financial Planning goes to Financial Planner (an occupation).  The articles on Personal budget and budget need serious work, but I'd say budgeting is important in personal finance. There's little talk history on this template. Can anyone explain this template a bit? --SueHay 01:21, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree seems strange.  I added personal budget to the template, and removed the pipe so can see that the article is financial planner.  Zodon (talk) 10:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Odd links

message: It seems unneeded, and provides free advertising for Visa.  Why not use a generic? Klosterdev (talk) 22:43, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why use the Visa logo?
Talk:Heave compensator

message: I agree. Not only do I agree, but the author's original author does (see comments in history). This is simple enough. We just merge the article and provide a redirect. --Otheus 15:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a pointer to the wiki project page: Wikipedia:Merging_and_moving_pages. Given that we're a majority here, I don't think we need to "wait a cople of weeks".
Done. Also moved talk sections. --Otheus 16:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Motion compensator]]
Talk:Minergie

message: MINERGIE is a non-profit-making association. The Wiki contributions do not follow any direct commercial aims, but support those wishing to use the standard. The label can for example be compared to the "fsc" (Forestry Stewardship Council) Label or the "Bio Suisse" Label for products from organic production. 
Hawkinsminergie (talk) 09:05, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Bahman Kiarostami

message: I noticed some of the information was out of date, so I added some new information with citations. However I also noticed some discrepancies with more movies listed and maybe slightly different titles that are listed on Wikipedia verses other sources like IMDB. I did some article clean up but this will need more. Jooojay (talk) 21:47, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing citations
Talk:StarCraft Mod

message: This page, already violating WP:NOR, is not something that requires it's own article.  This article can be cut down significantly and then placed inside the actual article. // 3R1C 15:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How bout we just redir to StarCraft? It's not significant enough to have its own article. Zeratul En Taro Adun!So be it. 15:52, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to Starcraft
Template talk:ConstellationList

message: This navbox is troublesome: by itself it may overlap constellation infoboxes in articles with little text but long infoboxes. I'm the one responsible – I'll try to find a fix, or else ask some template expert. Rursus declamavi;  15:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked and fixed as far as I can deem, if anything's wrong with it, please let me know! Rursus declamavi;  15:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Short Bomber

message: New to this so forgive me if it's the wrong place.
The text of this article & the line drawings state the aircraft was fitted with a two bladed propeller, yet the photo clearly shows a four bladed one.
How should this be resolved?Oddbodkin (talk) 21:08, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:New York reload

message: What if I were to give my word of honor that I wasn't the one who published those sources, but have instead found them via Google? ^^; --Koveras ☭ 15:35, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Someone should just delete this or redirect it to Reload. Wiktionary doesn't have an article for this. PotentialDanger (talk) 06:37, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No point?
Talk:The Examiner (Tasmania)

message: In consulting this article for general information, I was alarmed to find the page dominated by what is virtually a separate and controversial article: "Publication of Anti-LGBT Disinformation" which has no relevance to the remainder of the content. Its contributor is an unregistered SPA editor who is to my mind soapboxing an LGBT issue without regard to its relevance and symmetry in the article. It has stood since 11 March 2023. Subject to unlikely consensus to the contrary, I intend to remove or heavily condense this content. Bjenks (talk) 05:25, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic content
Talk:Fornax

message: Text says:
:Fornax, in Roman mythology, was the goddess of bread and baking, although this has nothing to do with the constellation (fornax is just the Roman word for furnace), as the constellation was created in 1763.
Yes, but why then is that written here? ;-) Very interesting facts written with best intent – but that should require an article Fornax (goddess) or some such. In Fornax (constellation) we would need some text about chemical furnaces as they were used in the end of 18th century in order to get a historically proper mnemonic for learning the constellation. Rursus declamavi;  15:42, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides – that text made me hungry, for some reason... Rursus declamavi;  15:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The italian word for "Fornax" is "fornace"... I agree with Part Time Security doubt: 'Roman' word has little if no meaning nowadays except if you consider it referred to Romance languages in general that developed from latin from the sixth to ninth centuries. So maybe "romance word" would make more sense. Comments are welcome.   M aurice   Carbonaro  10:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Mythology ROTFLs

message: At 14:57(UTC), on the 31st January 2013 a contribution I have made adding (...)  of the celestial sphere (...) to the article has been undone by Arthur Rubin (talk) with the following motivation:
:Reverted 1 edit by Maurice Carbonaro (talk): No sense this makes.  ...
It looks Point of view  to me and a violation to Neutral point of view that editors would normally expect from an Administrator.
Comments are welcome. Thanks.
  M aurice   Carbonaro  07:37, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I stand by that.  The celestial sphere has little to do with constellations.  If you got the idea from another constellation article, please let me know, so I can remove it there.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 08:45, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:POV|POV]] or [[WP:NPOV|NPOV]]?