lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Universal High School

message: I am not certain of the noteworthiness of a UHS page but I would not suggest merging this with Silver Creek High School's page. UHS is considered independent of Silver Creek and is run by St. Vrain, not Silver Creek. Silver Creek only serves as the host building. If someone wanted to start a page on St. Vrain Valley School District and then merge this into that page, that would be acceptable. --Monsuco (talk) 18:51, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Indiana Republican Party

message: (1) History 1925 to 2020. 
(2) description of the party organization editeur24 (talk) 14:28, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subjects to Add
Talk:Getcha Girl Dogg

message: Should this be considered as part of or an addendum to Snoop Dogg's discography? This definitely needs sources, but the page contradicts itself as to whether or not it was released by Snoop Dogg. Even if it wasn't and it's just some bootleg compiled by a fan, is it possible that it's significant enough to warrant a link from the rapper's discography? Alberrosidus (talk) 18:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discography
Talk:Connecticut Republican Party

message: Why should this article be any different?  It reads like it was written by the Democrat Party -- and lets face it -- it was.  --2600:6C65:747F:14C9:7C07:9D6:57BC:155A (talk) 22:43, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: BIAS IN ARTILE 
Talk:2008 Indiana Democratic presidential primary

message: "12 superdelegates, of whom five have announced support for Sen. Hillary Clinton and four for Sen. Barack Obama while four remain uncommitted." -- Repetition (talk) 21:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 5 for Hillary, 4 for Obama, 3 uncommitted = 12 total superdelegates. HoosierStateTalk 22:35, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  superdelegate numbers don't add up 

message: Is pre-primary polling data still relevant?  Bigturtle (talk) 22:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Kinda yeah. Shows what could've been expected then what the results actually came out to be. HoosierStateTalk 22:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Polling

message: http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P08/IN-D.phtml
Dan (talk) 21:03, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary was proportional by CD, not winner take all 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of music featured in Skins

message: I would like to see the return of the list of music in skins page. The music featured in this program is not abstract, in fact music plays a major part in every episode, with many songs shown in their entirety without any dialogue from the characters. Furthermore, one of the arguements against the deletion of this page was that the music in each episode was shown on the episode pages. At this point, I'd like to point out that there are no episode pages for skins!
I also agree.
213.48.73.89 (talk) 20:06, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Street Fighter Alpha 3

message: Someone wrote the dreamcast version is "essentially an improvement over the saturn version".  The saturn version was released AFTER the dreamcast version, so the dreamcast version cannot be an improvement over a game that didn't exist yet.
Also, how is the dreamcast version an improvement over the saturn version?  I've played both, and the ONLY advantage the dreamcast version has is much faster loading times, and crisper sounding audio.
The saturn version has reverse dramatic battles, a new T-hawk walking backward animation frame, and stereo sound.  the dreamcast version has NONE of this.  it doesnt even have stereo sound for god's sakes.
I'm editing the section about the dreamcast version.  If anyone wants to refute my claims, feel free.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.3.225.48 (talk) 08:21, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dreamcast vs Saturn

message: I'm certain somewhere back in the mists of time characters like Rainbow Mika and Karin had their own pages. Are there any major objections to recreating them?Nilzy (talk) 17:41, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character Profiles 

message: No section on the reception of this game? Was it appreciated better than Alpha 2 (which was considered the best fighter of 1996)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.19.65 (talk) 18:49, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 
Talk:2004 United States House of Representatives elections in Washington

message: I propose that Heidi Behrens-Benedict be merged with United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Washington,_2004#District_8 on this page, since the Benedict article's only notable parts can easily be included in this section. Peace, --Wikibojopayne (talk) 23:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Randy Evans

message: So much stuff .... reduce it to what is notable. Albert Einstein published a shorter list. Reads as if Mr Evans PA wrote it for a CV.... needs wikifying Victuallers (talk) 19:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Planted by Evans staff. Conflict of interest.--Wetman (talk) 06:12, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just took a first stab at removing some of the non-encyclopedic info. This article is a mess, and needs A LOT more work. --Roswell native (talk) 03:23, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I established a short version of this article because it was so bad in need of a cleanup. Now we have a long, promotional, account inserted by yet another single purpose account. I happen to think the shorter version is more encyclopedic. Any thoughts? Jesanj (talk) 15:59, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short version 

message: This bio needs reference to the February 2022 State Department OIG inspection which indicates a toxic and bullying atmosphere engendered by Randy Evan’s. 94.137.72.49 (talk) 17:20, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Department of State OIG findings
Talk:Hatf-VIII (Ra'ad)

message: Should the title be changed to "Ra'ad cruise missile" ? Hj108 (talk) 14:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the current title is ok or probably "Ra'ad (ACLM)". Consider creating a redirect for your suggestion. --lTopGunl (talk) 15:05, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Shaheen-II

message: Does anybody disagree with removing the section on threats from another country? Surely it belongs in another article. Hj108 (talk) 12:13, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing text on external threats

message: Pakistan can use their Shaheen as Expendable launch system. Dr. Samar Mubarakmand had said that Pakistan will launch its 2 satellites from China. Why cant Shaheen cant be use??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.216.19.32 (talk) 20:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a missile designed to put warheads on ground targets, not satellites in space.Hj108 (talk) 16:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shaheen as Pakistani Satellite Launch Vehicle 
Talk:Roogoo

message: Sorry, forgot to login before making the previous edit (changed aggregate stats to reflect current statistics, and changed the first sentence of 'Reception' to more accurately represent the overall critical reception).  At any rate, I did wonder: what is the correct statistic that should be listed for the aggregates on games released on multiple platforms?  In this case, the difference between the PC and XBOX version's scores is quite noticable (72/71 on PC, 78/78 on XBOX).  In this case I went with the XBOX aggregate, but don't know if that was correct. Did some poking around, but didn't see anything regarding this. Femtorgon (talk) 20:45, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Øresundståg

message: This article is missing template:infobox train. Peter Horn User talk 23:46, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That is because, despite its current title, the article is not really about a train as such, but about a train service. -- Picapica (talk) 22:01, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We have  for just such a case.  Slambo (Speak) 16:07, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: The term Oresundtrain appears to be a Wikipedia invention. I don't find it being used anywhere other than on Wikipedia and its copies. The network itself uses the Swedish form Öresundståg in its English-language publications and website. This may be "the English-language Wikipedia" as some are so find of reminding of us, but I don't think it is our business to be making up our own neologisms. -- Picapica (talk) 19:34, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree - there are absulutely no "Oresund" or "Oresund trains". But given Denmarks historical rights over Øresund (also after Scania was captured by the Swedes), the Sound Dues was in use from 1429 until 1857 (with exception for Swedish ships only between 1658 and 1720) - AND the fact that a Danish "Ø" is used on the trains AND the fact that the population around Øresund is around twice as high (atleast) on the Danish side AND the fact that the Danish Capital Copenhagen is located by the Øresund, I think the Danish spelling ought to be used. Any "middle way" is in my mind totally out of the question. And I cannot really see any good reason to use "Öresund" in English. And atleast among Swedes living by Öresund (like myself), I think few would object to the Danish spelling. Or please give me a good reason why not, I'm not stubborn and can listen to reason. Boeing720 (talk) 02:04, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia neologism 
Talk:What the Bleep Do We Know!?/Keilana's proposal

message: :Thank you, Keilana for doing this. Hopefully, we can come to some sort of consensus on the lead and this should help.(olive (talk) 20:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I said that it posits that macroscopic entities can be influenced by thought. What's wrong with that? Keilana|Parlez ici 19:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it also posits that microscopic entities can be influenced by thought. ScienceApologist (talk) 19:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, if you look at draft one on the other page, you'll notice that ice crystals is replaced with water molecules which is truer to the scene in the film. Did you look at that draft? It may give you some good ideas for improvement. ScienceApologist (talk) 19:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:HMS Incomparable

message: Incomparable—range.
Although most accounts of this ship describe that it was to be driven by steam turbines, one account of this ship describes it as a "motor" driven.
It seems unlikely that the necessary range to circle the world without refuelling would be possible using steam engines. Using much more economical diesel engines similar, if larger, than those in a submarine would almost certainly give a considerably greater range.
Are any other details available?AT Kunene (talk) 09:47, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Some disjointed (OCR limitations?) mentions here http://www.ebooksread.com/authors-eng/john-arbuthnot-fisher-fisher/memories-hsi/page-15-memories-hsi.shtml but it is in the context of Fisher bemoaning lack of progress in the area of diesel engines. (It strikes me that diesel would have been on his wishlist but if it had of been built it would have been steam.) GraemeLeggett (talk) 12:23, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Diesels at the time were tiny things I think, of the order of a few hundred hp. I don't think it would be feasible in the timeframe to use a purely diesel powered BC. Greglocock (talk) 07:42, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Germans had developed a 12000 hp diesel that was running in 1917, so you'd need 15 of them to get the required power, and get M.A.N. to sell them to you.  Greglocock (talk) 07:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propulsion 

message: Should this article be included in :Category:World War I battlecruisers of the United Kingdom given that HMS Incomparable was never built so therefore did not participate in World War I? Dunarc (talk) 22:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion in Category:World War I battlecruisers of the United Kingdom
Talk:Blathur

message: Well it survived AfD but we still know nothing about the place. I've gone back to all we know, which is the info box. "Article" is indeed on life support. Travellingcari (talk) 18:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: AGreed, however it survived AfD on the grounds that it's populated and therefore notable. That said, I don't think we're losing anything if this article is eventually deleted. StarM 01:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That AfD was a year ago, when the proposal that all geographic locations with population were 'inherently' notable. It is appropriate to keep pages where a policy proposal that would affect their status is being debated upon. That proposal, however, failed to reach a consensus, and as such, this article should fall under the general Notability guidelines. With no independent references, this article cannot be considered notable. Crickel (talk) 00:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feb 2008 
Talk:Eurytion

message: I don't think this is a disambiguation page.  It isn't a page with the sole purpose of linking to multiple articles that might alternatively be titled "Eurytion"; it simply explains several related meanings of the term.  I think it's really just an article stub.  I'd propose we remove the disambiguation template, which will also mean that people can stop using :Template:Page d to link to it.  Any objections?  TSP (talk) 19:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are absolutely correct. This is not a disambiguation page. It is currently a stub article that merely mentions the multiple figures in Greek mythology with the name Eurytion. Deucalionite (talk) 17:07, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation?
Talk:Encampment River

message: The upper part of this river that extends into Colorado was once called Encampment Creek and has a separate GNIS entry.  --Footwarrior (talk) 22:41, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: River origin
Talk:Plotkin bound

message: The original article only describes one aspect of the Plotkin bound. In my Coding Theory class we show that the Plotkin bound actually gives four bounds, depending on the values of d and n. I have added the other three sections and tried to clean up the article. It's still a bit technical. If anyone has further suggestions I'm all ears. --Culix (talk) 19:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parts of the Plotkin Bound 

message: Any interest in the GF(q) version for a [n,k,d] code?
d\leq \frac{nq^{k-1}(q-1)}{q^k-1} --76.85.202.68 (talk) 02:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  For GF(q)?
Talk:My Man's Gone Now

message: I was surprised that this page didn't already exist as the song is quite famous. I did a search first but I couldn't find it.  SmokeyTheCat  •TALK• 19:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sinead O'Connor's name, that I had added, was scratched away immediately, because it apparently was 'not notable compared to those listed here'. Now that's a point of view. I would suggest that various versions of very various artists should be included here, to inform various Wikipedia users. That's not something to decide for one editor with one point of view. Valdymont (talk) 09:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The song has been recorded by a very large number of singers. Listing them all is not the job of this encyclopedia. There are specialist websites for that, like Musicbrainz, AllMusic, Discogs, and many more. If reputable sources discuss Sinéad O'Connor's recording as notable, that can be included overleaf in the section currently titled "Versions". That section heading should probably be changed to "Notable recordings" and its content sourced, or trimmed. Mere appearance on an album doesn't make it notable. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 11:15, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: very large number, that I doubt. Special websites are not of any interest for Wikipedia. I don't have access to as many 'reputable sources' that you probably have, as an Englishman or American. I just saw it broadcast on Dutch television a week ago. So far, I didn't see any argument from your side other than your point of view ('notable recordings' again is just a point of view). Valdymont (talk) 22:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not my view – Wikipedia guidelines state that it is not an indiscriminate collection of facts. All material needs to be supported by independent published verifiable sources. Whether a recording is notable can easily be determined by the presence of such sources. Special websites are very much of interest to Wikipedia articles: you'll find them at the bottom of millions of articles. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:20, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Sinead O'Connor's version
Talk:Official mail

message: This article was in hiding for too long, good to see it out here;-)--PremKudvaTalk 03:52, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good job 
Talk:Prostitution in Panama

message: :The external link, Prostitution in Panama, referred to in the article, is a 12-year-old article and thus cannot be presumed to be the least bit useful as to understanding the current situation. Therefore that link ought to be deleted (unless the author intends to be discussing ancient history of panamanian prostitution, which certainly doesn't appear to be the case).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.66.56.222 (talk) 02:31, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I live in Panama. That link still reflects the current reality BoonDock (talk) 18:13, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Beam (nautical)

message: Some of this article must have been copied from a website. It says "I have found..." which should be reworded. I don't know much about what is good to keep and what should be removed though. If someone smarter than me could help... 209.181.58.51 (talk) 13:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

message: I did a minimal change in the rule of thumb.
But I signal two problems that I cannot fix:
in the figure b is declared the beam but the text says that it is the watereline beam.
The start of the incipit is unhappy: the beam b is declared the maximum tout-court but then bmax sems the same maximum, i.e. b=bmax ... perhaps the problem is that bmax and b are significantly different for an aircraft carrier whose angled flight deck makes the ship strongly asymmetrical (and the extreme points are at different distance from the bow), but if so this should be stated ... I understand perfectly that to be mathematically rigorous with an asymmetric ship would result in a heavy text (define the axis, the perpendicular to it, the parallel planes) but something should be done
my english is poor and something may sound unpolite, if so excuse me.
pietro151.29.14.156 (talk) 09:36, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  various
Talk:Madison Metro Area

message: The correct page is Madison, Wisconsin, metropolitan statistical area, which is an actual page and not a stub. Beginning redirect/merge process now. - 184.58.152.221 (talk) 03:20, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useless!
Wikipedia talk:Notability (Geographic locations)

message: Since this article was marked as a proposal, when it was first created a year ago, there seems to have been no consensus on this article. Since editors don't like the  or  tag, I suggest the same tag as is being used on Wikipedia:Notability (criminal acts). travb (talk) 04:35, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The dormant tag is acceptable, IMO. Kaldari (talk) 23:18, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "editors don't like" what they don't like, so what? It failed, and should be marked failed. NVO (talk) 07:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Tell that to the editors at Wikipedia:Notability (criminal acts), I was just proposing something which wouldn't cause edit wars. travb (talk) 14:13, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

text: I don't agree that a lack of consensus is the same thing as dormant. Failed proposals should be marked failed. Crickel (talk) 18:56, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: After 1 year of being proposed, what is the conclusion? 

message: Occurring at WP:VPP#New level of geographical notability.3F. Constructive discussion is welcome. OrangeDog (talk • edits) 10:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New discussion
Talk:Vengeance (2005)

message: Sorry this is a little late, but I wanted to make sure I got to looking at this article. It looks good, but there are a few things that I wanted to mention:
#The lead could use more information. It should be at least two well-developed paragraphs.
#In the first paragraph of the "Background" section, "following the aftermath of Backlash" seems redundant. "Following Backlash" is probably enough.
#:--  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your hard work addressing all of those points. All of my concerns have been fixed, and I think the article is looking really good. Best wishes with the GA review, GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:31, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the pre-GA, Gary. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:15, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-GA review 

message: I know it's been quite a long time, but I'm going to review it.
:GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#:: 
#:::For the event? SexySeaShark 16:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, LAX. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Congratulations, I have promoted this article! Good luck getting the article to a FA! Thisisborin9sign here! 19:46, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Nomination Review (finally)
Talk:MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies

message: CorenSearchBot is in error.  There is no copyright violation.
Marilyn Wilkes
Public Affairs Director
The Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center
for International and Area Studies
marilyn.wilkes@yale.edu
Marilynwilkes (talk) 20:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: this is only one part of the center; we do not have separate articles for such subdivisions  DGG ( talk ) 21:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Gilder Lehrman Center for the Study of Slavery, Resistance, and Abolition]] 
Talk:Luton Hoo

message: I removed the phrase "Straddles the Hertfordshire and Bedfordshire borders" from the first paragraph because this statement was unsourced and the Ordnance Survey map indicates that Luton Hoo is about 3.5 km from the Hertfordshire border. If you have a reliable source for this then please cite it and restore the phrase. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:33, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Straddles the [[Hertfordshire]] and [[Bedfordshire]] borders
File talk:Voltage stabiliser transistor.png

message: Simple voltage stabilizer
In the simplest case, the base of the regulating transistor is directly connected to the voltage reference:
The stabilizer uses the power source, having voltage Uin that may vary over time. It delivers the relatively constant voltage Uout. The output load RL can also vary over time. For the proper work of such device the input voltage must be larger than the output voltage and the output current must not exceed the allowed transistor limit.
The output voltage of the stabilizer is a little lower than the output of the voltage reference circuit Rv-D1 (output Uz). If the output voltage drops below that limit, this increases the voltage difference between the base and emitter (Ube), opening the transistor and delivering more current. Delivering more current through the same output resistor RL increases the voltage again.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.55.92.82 (talk) 20:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)