Talk:Belagavi district

message: Mahawiki, what do you mean by NPOV?  Do you want me to write that
*Belgaum is a part of MH?
*The Mahajan commission ACCEPTED MH's demand for Belgaum city?
*Maharashtra did NOT go back on its word to honour the Mahajan commission's report?
*Belgaum is NOT a legal and constitutional part of Karnataka?
*That the Belgaum Corporation was superseded by the Govt of Karnataka illegaly?
*Karnataka govt butchered Marathis in Belgaum?
*That Mahajan commission did not recommend exchange of villages between Kar and MH?
*Karnataka govt bribed Justice Meherchand Mahajan?
Sorry, but if you want all the above trash to make it into WP, you will need to cite references.  As of now you havent cited a single reference to back any of your claims.  Your jingoism is childish, laughable and only matched by that of fundamentalist outfits across the globe.  Wikipedia is not the place for your obsessive compulsive trolling.  Take it someplace else. Sarvagnya 18:26, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: By NPOV i just mean that dont show Maharashtra in bad light.Write what all facts ,i dont mind.But dont just go thru the deccan herald.There's other side of story too.Frame a article in NPOV,dont project Maharashtra as villion.We are not doing anything deliberately to trouble.For we are victims too...I strongly recommend rewriting of border problem in real neutral point of view.Perhaps a non-marathi and non-kannadi editor shud do that..
I have cited a source if u see my edition.
(mahawiki 18:43, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I am not sure if you guys are aware about WP:3RR. You are involved in a dispute and the rules of wikipedia clearly forbid reverting more than 3 times in a day. Now, I propose that all of you cool down a bit. I am going to look at the article and then give my opinion. You are free to accept it or reject it - but if you revert further you will be banned. I will make some suggestions below soon.- Aksi_great (talk - review me) 18:54, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made changes at Belgaum. Please take a look at the border dispute section there. The sources are enough. I think the text now reads neutral, toned down an encyclopedia worthy. Please add more information citing references and not mentioning them in the external links. Take a look at Template:Cite web for citing websites and Template:Cite news to cite news articles. Remember to fill in as many fields as you can. - Aksi_great (talk - review me) 19:41, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  3RR 

message: Dear Sir/Madam,
I shall respect the rule which u put forth.I just have a problem with kind of language they have used about Maharashtra.They have projected my state as guilty and villanious.I just want that article to be written in neutral language not taking either's side.Let them include facts but not make any judgements.
Sorry for inconvinence and hope Truth alone truimphs!
Jai Maharashtra
(mahawiki 19:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks for intervening 

message: Sarvagnya is out of mind,I suppose.The Deccan Herald belongs to a Kannada newshouse which have no presence outside Karnataka.I request the authorities to please review all the links/citations mentioned by this guy and find out yourself how shamelessly this newspaper gives biased statement which cant be used as citations here atleast those 'which are defamatory to Maharashtra and judgemental'.Sarvagnya has also included some Kannada media news stories which needless to say are hillarious and have zero credibilty.I dont have problems with Newswindpress,Hindu but i request editors to review the content of citations and whats being included in article.I donno why this guy is allergic to TOI and Indian express.
If at all his citations and defamatory language against Maharashtra is allowed,I shall be present with citations from Maharashtra Times,Pudhari,Belgaon Tarun Bharat,Sakal and Loksatta.
mahawiki 04:54, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are you hell bent on making a fool of yourself?  For starters, someone who thinks Deccan Herald belongs to Vijaya Karnataka group very obviously knows nothing about Deccan Herald.  And number two, the Deccan Herald citations were by User:Aksi and not by me.  The citation I added is from newindpress.  In your best interests, revert your vandalism now.  Sarvagnya 05:33, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarvagnya's sources are rediculous! 

message: You are not entitled to pass ahn judgement about population of Marathis in Belgaum.Sentence which demean Maharashra or Belgaon movement will not be allowed at any cost.
mahawiki 05:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  biased and sentences against Maharashtra were modified 

message: A new article - Belgaum border dispute - has been created to track information about this issue.
I suggest that in order to keep information cohesive and centralised, material related to this dispute from this article be moved to (and merged with) the Belgaum border dispute article. 
This will also make it easier to maintain information, and will make it easier to link to from other related articles.
Achitnis 21:14, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Belgaum Border Dispute article 

message: Who added such a Horrible template to the article? And why? We can definitely wait until the template is improved. If no objection, I will remove it 3 days.--Scheibenzahl 17:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horrible Template 

message: Constant edits to add/remove Kannada and Marathi scripts. Lets keep the border dispute out of this and be as neutral as possible. Usage of Kannada or Marathi scripts is acceptable, but the offical name of the district is still "Belgaum" and not "Belgavi", "Belgaav" or "Belgao"
Also why are current professors from local colleges being added to the notable personalities section?
A g v (talk) 04:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup and Verification Required 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Belgaum district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100111052456/http://www.censusindiamaps.net/page/India_WhizMap/IndiaMap.htm to http://www.censusindiamaps.net/page/India_WhizMap/IndiaMap.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131019160532/http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/apportionment-pop-text.php to http://2010.census.gov/2010census/data/apportionment-pop-text.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:42, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Belgaum district. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721163433/http://belgaum.nic.in/stat.html to http://belgaum.nic.in/stat.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120216065838/http://www.gazetteer.kar.nic.in/data/gazetteer/postind/Kar_Handbook_2005_Chapter14.Pdf to http://www.gazetteer.kar.nic.in/data/gazetteer/postind/Kar_Handbook_2005_Chapter14.Pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified