Talk:Copenhagen Business School

message: I removed the statement that CBS graduates are some of the most sought after. No statistics are available to support it. Furthermore, it seems that the same user has removed a similar statement from the article: Roskilde University. Wikipedia should not be used for PR-purposes. User:Sir48, Denmark
There have been some organisational changes to CBS recently (e.g. there is only one faculty now). The article needs to reflect this. 194.255.106.26 21:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007

message: Hi CBSCommunication,
Just added your updates in numbers and figure. But deleted the promotion stuff, as wikipedia is not for direct marketing - should be allright now.(Jsz2010 (talk) 05:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added updates - deleted commercialized stuff 

message: Unfortunately, the article is blocked. Could you either unblock the article or add the following sentence:
Copenhagen Business School has been ranked #59 by Times Higher Education in its Most International Universities in the World 2016 ranking. Source: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/200-most-international-universities-world-2016  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.184.23.200 (talk) 08:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. — Train2104 (t • c) 05:28, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add 

message: Hi.
Over the past month or so, there has been a big dispute over whether it should be stated that CBS is regarded as one of the best business schools in
the world, and whether its highest ranking should be stated in the Introduction.
I keep getting the argument that my statement is "biased" and that CBS is not included in the top in various rankings; apparently the people who
keep saying that are not very good at researching. 
Rankings
Also, CBS is purely a business/social sciences school, that it does not appear in general rankings.
But as you can see, it is both ranked in FT, QS, ARWU, while 
also being in the top 10 in various one. So excuse me but this is not a "promo" or whatever, it is stating a fact by also putting up references, both 
about the actual rankings, and CBS being one of the best in the world and Europe. "Biased" would be if I talked about its "fame" without me having any references; something that I am not doing.
The other argument is that "rankings belong under rankings". The reference of the rankings I add in the introduction is just a direct reference to it being one of the best business schools. Also, I don't see the same people altering other pages of universities having the same structure, i.e. Bocconi University or MIT Sloan.
So I would like some valid arguments to that, instead of hearing the same, false arguments.
Regards,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.98.122.70 (talk) 12:12, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction and ranking dispute 

message: Hi.
There has been a big dispute over whether it should be stated that CBS is regarded as one of the best business schools in the world, and whether its highest ranking should be stated in the Introduction.
I keep getting the argument that my statement is "biased" and that CBS is not included in the top in various rankings; apparently, the people who keep saying that are not very good at researching.
Rankings
Also, CBS is purely a business/social sciences school, that it does not appear in general rankings. But as you can see, it is both ranked in FT, QS, ARWU, while also being in the top 10 in various one. So excuse me but this is not a "promo" or whatever, it is stating a fact by also putting up references, both about the actual rankings, and CBS being one of the best in the world and Europe. "Biased" would be if I talked about its "fame" without me having any references; something that I am not doing.
The other argument is that "rankings belong under rankings". The reference of the rankings I add in the introduction is just a direct reference to it being one of the best business schools. Also, I don't see the same people altering other pages of universities having the same structure, i.e. Bocconi University or MIT Sloan.
So I would like some valid arguments to that, instead of hearing the same, false arguments. 212.98.122.70 (talk) 17:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 March 2017 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Copenhagen Business School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150803210808/http://bss.au.dk/currently/news/news-item/artikel/amba-accreditation-for-school-of-business-and-social-sciences/ to http://bss.au.dk/currently/news/news-item/artikel/amba-accreditation-for-school-of-business-and-social-sciences/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Please change "however, it wasn't until 1920" in the introduction to "however, it was not until 1920" per Wikipedia:Contractions. 5.151.0.115 (talk) 22:37, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done as this is a minor edit only. —KuyaBriBriTalk 22:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 January 2018 

message: Thanks, 205.189.94.17 (talk) 18:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add tag to main page