lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Operation Ortsac

message: * Apart of the first paragraph this article seems to be about Cuban Missile Crisis and not about Operation Ortsac. From the context and from the Cuban Missile Crisis article I understood, that these two were not the same. So I think that all the paragraphs apart of the first one are redundant. This information belongs to Cuban Missile Crisis article (and it is there and better sourced). I am not going to delete them as I would look as a vandal if my only contribution in several months was a huge deletion, but it is my oppinion anyway.  --Jan Smolik 21:53, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article doesn't seem to be about Operation Ortsac 

message: Since it was quite easy to see that Ortsac is Castro spelt backwards, what was the point of naming the operation Ortsac? It would have been the thinnest of veils to try to disguise the aim of the operation - was this obviousness intended? --80.47.203.53 23:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the name Ortsac

message: Looking at List_of_military_operations and , it looks like this article refers to 'Operation Phibriglex', conducted in October of 1962... seems like that ought to be mentioned in the article.
-- Ploer (talk) 00:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phibriglex? 

message: I'm flagging this article with a POV template. The whole article reads to me like someone who was against Ortsac wrote it. This article should be about the operation, not about why it wasn't chosen. 67.149.81.70 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:00, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 18:54, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: According to Robert Kennedy, the mission of Operation ORTSAC was to stage an invasion of a desert island and depose the imaginary dictator there, thus frightening Castro, not to actually try to depose Castro. There's a difference. I might be wrong. 68.173.0.226 (talk) 02:13, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong.
Talk:Omar Khalif Mohammed Abu Bakr Mahjour Umar

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 07:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 
Talk:Padsha Wazir

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 07:13, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: I reverted this edit because I believe it is based on a serious misconception.
The person who made this edit believes "Padsha Wazir" and "Pacha Wazir" are different names. Unlike Chinese, that has the Pinyin transliteration system there is no standard transliteration system for Arabic.  These two men don't have similar names.  They have identical names.  Geo Swan (talk) 02:56, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  explanation
Talk:Rashid Abdul Mosleh Qayed

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 12:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]]
Talk:Ravil Shafeyavich Gumarov

message: It is a mistake to shoehorn Arabic names into the English style of surnames.
I removed the listas -- and someone reverted this edit with the edit summary, "No, he's Russian".
I suggest this is misleading.
Russian citizen?  Yes.  Ethnic Russian?  No.  The guy is a Muslim, from one of the Muslim regions of the Soviet Union.  Geo Swan (talk) 02:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He may be a Muslim, but his name is not Arabic.  I mean, just look at it - does "Shafeyavich" or "Gumarov" sound Arabic to you? Katharineamy (talk) 11:55, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: It is a mistake to shoehorn Arabic names into the English style of surnames
Talk:Richard Belmar

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 15:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]] 
Talk:Tenor cornett

message: "Ranges of pitches" is a rather awkward and ungainly way of describing the tessitura of the instrument. A better description would be simply "Range" or "Compass", however, I am at a loss to understand why the term "tessitura" was edited out.
Steven Langley Guy
I must concur with mister Guy; I feel his assertions on nomneclature are spot on.
:A picture of this instrument would do this page wonders; if anyone owns one of these, please photograph it and post the photo so others can see what one of these actually looks like. Highonhendrix (talk) 05:23, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tessitura
Talk:Ruhal Ahmed

message: The film repeatedly spells his name as Ruhel. Should this be a good enough reason for changing the title?
shzephyr07 00:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Americans have a saying, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."  There is alrealy a redirection: Ruhel Ahmed.  Isn't that sufficient?  --  Geo Swan 04:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Spelling?

message: There does not seem to be sufficient material to write about him by himself. The Lead has content not in the body of the article and is longer than it. Perhaps the three should only be covered under Tipton Three. This does not even include the result of the Supreme Court ruling.Parkwells (talk) 20:07, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete? Lead is longer than article
Talk:Sabri Mohammed Ebrahim Al Qurashi

message: I think default sort is a mistake for individuals with Arabic names.
People with Arabic names don't inherit a surname, like people with an European do.
Traditionally the closest thing they have to a "last name" is their father's first name.
And it is absolutely clear to me that it is a mistake to use default sort for the Guantanamo captives -- because the US Department of Defense can't consistently figure out what their names are. 
Therefore I just reverted an edit where a well-meaning contributor imposed default sort on this individual.
Please don't impose default sort on these guys without discussing it first. 
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 04:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think default sort is a mistake for Arabic names 

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work 

message: Wikipedia's article on the Casio F91W does not mention a compass feature. WhiteDragon (talk) 17:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that is unverified that it was a Casio F91W. It may have been another model. IQinn (talk) 00:48, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  does the F91W have a compass
Talk:I Am Not My Hair

message: The sentence "She said that she did not want Akon to be featured on the song, without mentioning his name." is ambiguous and should be edited for clarity.
It could mean:
1) "Without mentioning the person's name, she said that she didn't want a male singer to be featured on the song." In other words, the record company forced her to accept another artist on the song against her will.
2) "She didn't want an uncredited, anonymous artist on the song." In other words, she wanted the male singer to be named and credited for his performance.
I don't know which of these two meanings was intended by the original author and hence cannot rewrite the sentence to remove the ambiguity.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.161.116.190 (talk) 07:13, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sahib Rohullah Wakil

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 07:58, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]]. 

message: The discussion takes place here
as a few more articles have the same problem. Iqinn (talk) 07:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pentagon claim he had..." (Disputed-section) 
Talk:Shakhrukh Hamiduva

message: Perhaps the pronoun is wrong here. Is Hamiduva not a woman? Le Anh-Huy 05:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All the Guantanamo captives are men.  --  Geo Swan 09:18, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Said Muhammed Salih Hatim

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 06:04, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: In this edit, with an edit summary of "clarify and unlink interpretation of questionable source", another contributor removed a bunch of valid and useful wikilinks. 
I think this kind of extensive and controversial edit requires further explanation on the article's talk page.  In particular I think that explanation should include a clear explanation of why the excising contributor consider the source "questionable".  
This contributor has similarly excised valid and useful wikilinks from several articles.  I don't care if they offer a single explanation, somewhere.  But I am leaving this note here, so that the need to deal with this issue in this article doesn't get forgotten.  Geo Swan (talk) 10:47, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Already explained here and here. I have told you  that here and  here. It is also in this post where i have ask you about that and other open questions. You have not answered my questions concerning these content issues nor have answered many of these posts at all. As well as many others posts concerning content issues. I would like to ask you not to ignore questions and to work more constructive to solve the outstanding issues. IQinn (talk) 14:13, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could you please explain... 

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Said Muhammed Salih Hatim. IQinn (talk) 14:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work
Talk:I Can't Read You

message: Chart Position?
It says it is the lowest charting single at 6 in the UK on the album, when the article for "friday" off the same album charted much lower at 28 in the UK. This needs clearing up or correcting, I know the articles are only stubs anyway.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.195.22.34 (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Sanad al-Kazimi

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 16:02, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: I suggest to move the article to Sanad Yislam al Kazimi following the New York Times and other secondary sources: ... IQinn (talk) 01:46, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: move?
Talk:Ripper (video game)

message: I just saw a video on YouTube about full motion video games and this game was mentioned and shown. The link is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5cIUrx_ttg. It starts at 4:40 and ends at 6:55 (although a more cowbell joke is thrown in right after.) So I also added the mention of it being a FMV game.
-Riverdanceman  —Preceding undated comment added 05:17, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The actual website this review (part of a series called "FMV Hell") is actually from is called The Spoony Experiment. Atypicaloracle (talk) 09:47, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's not just an adventure game, it's also an FMV game, too!
Talk:Rocket Jockey

message: Seriously? Advertising to sell your game engine on Wikipedia? At least state it factually, don't throw around buzz-phrases.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.173.121 (talk) 07:25, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *https://archive.org/details/powerplaymagazine-1996-12/page/n35
*https://web.archive.org/web/19971012045244/http://www.pcgamer.com:80/news/news02-03-97.html#15
*Official review list
*https://archive.org/stream/boot-magazine-issue06-mmx-feb-1997/Boot%20Magazine%20-%20Issue%20006%20-%20MMX%20-%20February%201997#page/n83/mode/2up
*https://web.archive.org/web/19970101080603/http://www.cdmag.com:80/news/1007961.html
*https://web.archive.org/web/19980207215529/http://ogr.com:80/news/news0297.html
*http://web.archive.org/web/19970619002642/http://www.segasoft.com:80/gamedept/rockjock/rjraves.html
*https://web.archive.org/web/19970605034420/http://www.gamecenter.com:80/Features/Peeks/Rocket/
*https://books.google.com/books?id=y-hfa6YSVFAC&pg=PA350
*https://archive.org/stream/nextgen-issue-022/Next_Generation_Issue_022_October_1996#page/n127/mode/2up
*https://archive.org/stream/NextGeneration27Mar1997/Next_Generation_27_Mar_1997#page/n95/mode/2up
*https://web.archive.org/web/20001203104200/https://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.06/streetcred_pr.html
*https://web.archive.org/web/20160304053422/http://gamewriter.videogamewriter.com/game-writer/rocket-jockey/
*https://web.archive.org/web/19970606043544/http://www.next-generation.com:80/news/102396b.html
*https://web.archive.org/web/19961220170543/http://www.next-generation.com:80/specials/071996.html
*https://web.archive.org/web/20021003120707/http://videogames.gamespot.com:80/features/universal/graveyard/sony14.html
JimmyBlackwing (talk) 23:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Saturn Bomberman Fight!!

message: I have found numerous sources and reviews for the article in print sources. Sega Saturn magazine both previewed and reviewed the game. Famitsu, Joypad, and others reviewed it too. Sega Retro lists several other reviews in gaming publications, but I have not read them myself. Harizotoh9 (talk) 03:48, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Restored
Talk:Sharaf Ahmad Muhammad Masud

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.   Geo Swan 04:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 22:23, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket. It is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Sharaf Ahmad Muhammad Masud. IQinn (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work
Talk:SimPark

message: What platform / operating systems was the game released for? I think we should add that to the article, along with one of those video game infoboxes.
Shrumster 16:56, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Platform(s)
Talk:Slah Muhamed Salih Al Zabe

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 06:56, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disputed picture 

message: I think default sort is a mistake for individuals with Arabic names.
People with Arabic names don't inherit a surname, like people with an European do.
Traditionally the closest thing they have to a "last name" is their father's first name.
And it is absolutely clear to me that it is a mistake to use default sort for the Guantanamo captives -- because the US Department of Defense can't consistently figure out what their names are. 
Therefore I just reverted an edit where a well-meaning contributor imposed default sort on this individual.
Please don't impose default sort on these guys without discussing it first. 
Cheers!  Geo Swan (talk) 04:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think default sort is a mistake for Arabic names 

message: We are running two articles of ISN 572.
*Salah Muhammad Salih Al Dhabi and 
*Slah Muhamed Salih Al Zabe
Salah Muhammad Salih Al Dhabi is the alternate name of Slah Muhamed Salih Al Zabe so i will merge Salah Muhammad Salih Al Dhabi into this article here in a few days.  
Anybody who thinks it is not a good idea? IQinn (talk) 06:50, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I merged Salah Muhammad Salih Al Dhabi into this article. IQinn (talk) 01:54, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge?
Talk:I Could Have Danced All Night

message: I thought it may be advisable to put the lyrics up here, but as upon receiving an edit conflict after trying to save my changes of putting the lyrics in a table, I realised it may be advisable to discuss before editing. What do y'all think: lyrics or no lyrics? Griffin4prez (talk) 00:33, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Lyrics cannot be wholly replicated on Wikipedia because they are protected under copyright. Only select lines, sourced, may be used to discuss composition aspects and such. See WP:LYRICS for more information. Thanks. Yves (talk) 00:36, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay thank you. I'm new up here Griffin4prez (talk) 18:07, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics
Talk:Sulaiman al-Nahdi

message: These links to the page numbers within the OARDEC documents may be useful to other contributors.  Geo Swan (talk) 21:15, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Another useful source is the The Guantanamo Docket it is an interactive database provided and updated by the New York Times. The database is searchable and has the Pentagon documents (CSRT and ARB) included. Additional documents and reliable New York Times research regarding the detainees at Guantanamo are also provided. This is the link to the documents and research regarding Sulaiman Awath Sulaiman Bin Ageel al Nahdi. IQinn (talk) 13:54, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rough work
Talk:Taj Mohammed (Guantanamo Bay detainee)

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 13:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]] 
Talk:Tariq al-Sawah

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 06:52, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed picture 

message: I am concerned -- I don't think this massive excission is justified by the link provided in the edit summary -- Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_84#Reliability_of_US_military_summary_reports.
The contributor who made this edit made many other massive excisions offering 
as the justification.  Geo Swan (talk) 18:18, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am concerned... 

message: I plan on removing the highly questionable notability tag.  Given everything we know about al-Sawah I think the tag is indefensible.  I'll remove it, in a reasonable period of time, provided no one can provide a meaningful justification.  Geo Swan (talk) 23:13, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  responsible use of tags
Talk:I Do (Rain song)

message: There is a duet version of this song with a female singer singing her lines in Chinese (I think, coz it's how it sounds to me). I've tried to search the web if there would be any info about this but I really can't find. I do have the duet version of the song on my files though. Anyone can lighten me up?
I Know It Now!! The Duet version is actualy a remix version with thai singer Panudda!! Now I'm gonna include in the article.--210.213.80.76 07:31, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duet Version 
Talk:Usama Hassan Ahmend Abu Kabir

message: Replaced transcluded image with inline image -  tag as per dispute on Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption.  Geo Swan 12:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced transcluded image with inline image - {{tl|npov}} tag as per dispute on [[Template talk:Combatant Status Review Tribunal trailer image and caption]]
Talk:Wassim Allad Omar

message: Are they the same individual?  Probably.  There are clues that they are.  Wasim is alleged to have ties to al-igatha, and Al Rashid confirmed that his associate Wassim Allad Omar had worked for what he called a legitimate, certified Saudi charity al-igatha.  I could expand the two articles to include this detail.  But, basically, I think the articles should present the facts, and let the readers draw the conclusions.
Some readers may think that letting readers decide for themselves unfairly implies that Guantanamo authorities were unwilling or unable to do a competent job at maintaining a reliable roster of the detainee's identities, and that the roster was full of errors..  But the truth is that the camp authorities did not do a competent job of maintaining a reliable roster of the detainee's identities, and the roster is full of errors.
If we count obvious spelling errors, like "Ahmend" instead of "Ahmed" the roster contains well over one hundred errors.  --  Geo Swan 10:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why didn't I merge [[Wasim (Guantanamo detainee 338)]] with [[Wassim Allad Omar]]?
Talk:Strikers 1945

message: Is this the same game as the one titled "1945 I & II" for Playstation 2, judging by screenshots they seem to be the same, but they seem to have left out "Strikers" from the title on the PS2 version (perhaps to connect them to the 1941, 1942 and 1943 arcade games previously released to the PS2)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.89.222.216 (talk) 00:16, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names for the game? 

message: "The end of the war was coming to an end", sounds wrong  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.95.133.216 (talk) 07:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit 
Talk:I Don't Wanna Stop

message: wowwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
Why "Lyrical Content" was deleted ? 217.21.40.13 18:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline text 

message: The info was wrong, so I took the liberty to change it. If you have any complaints about it talk about it here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.210.240.53 (talk) 22:10, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Guitar Hero information