Talk:Iran–United Kingdom relations

message: The section about this at the bottom of the page has a link I put in that takes the user to the article covering it, it doesn't seem to work, can anyone help? Thanks.Bananaman1966 00:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 Iranian seizure of Royal Navy Personnel

message: I am no expert on Iran-UK relations but how can Sir Anthony Eden be a significant Briton involved in Iranian politics during the monarchy of Fath  Ali Shah, when he was born 60 or so years after the Shah died.
Seconded. Eden nor Harold Nicolson were alive at the same time as Fath Ali Shah. Also, the Charles Christie linked appears to be a Hollywood director. Perhaps the wrong Christie? JSlayerUK (talk) 00:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology

message: To be consistent with other articles, should this be renamed?  See Anglo-Australian relations, Anglo-Chinese relations, Anglo-French relations, Anglo-German relations, Anglo-Irish relations, Anglo-Japanese relations, and Anglo-American relations.  There are a few other examples to the contrary, however. Tim (Xevious) 12:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree with changing the name. I like to add that for consistency with other articles such as Anglo-Persian Oil Company, Anglo-Persian War, Anglo-Persian Agreement, and Anglo-Persian Treaty of 1801, this article is better to be renamed to Anglo-Persian relations. As you may notice, Anglo-Iranian Oil Company is already redirected to Anglo-Persian Oil Company. --FakhredinBlog (talk) 10:18, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible move to Anglo-Iranian relations?

message: :Image:Aussie womens weekly shah.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Aussie womens weekly shah.jpg

message: :Image:Le Soir Shah.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Le Soir Shah.jpg

message: Wow when you read this, it kinda makes you foget that the British controled the Iran goverment for decades and were in partnership with the US involving the Shaw of Iran. Jacob805 (talk) 11:27, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amazing that a page on British and Iran relation make no mention of MI6 or SIS

message: The legend for the info box is wrong, the UK is the Green island group just off europe whilst the Orange nation in the middle is Iran. I can't work out how to alter it so I'll remove it. could some one who can fix it do so and put it back?(Morcus (talk) 13:29, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made a new map (:File:Iran-United Kingdom.svg) in which I've switched the colours around, so it should be okay now. Jolly Ω Janner 20:25, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labels backward. 

message: In the introduction the article states that prior to 1935 Iran was known as India. This is incorrect as prior to that year Iran was actually known as Persia. The correct previous name for Iran is stated in the article for that country. I'm changing the article to correct this slight error.
Colorado785 (talk) 23:03, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect information 

message: The fatwah was not a call for his death, but a declaration that to kill him would not be sinful in Islamic terms.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.151.224.70 (talk) 20:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rushdie Fatwah 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Iran–United Kingdom relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130723052436/http://www.presstv.com/detail/2012/07/15/251063/oman-to-represent-iran-interests-in-uk/ to http://www.presstv.com/detail/2012/07/15/251063/oman-to-represent-iran-interests-in-uk/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081106153300/http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page4935.asp to http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page4935.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081021220621/http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/Page4869.asp to http://www.royal.gov.uk/output/page4869.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130720224433/http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/32743/1/Nixon%2C_Kissinger%2C_and_the_Shah_the_origins_of_Iranian_primacy_in_the_Persian_Gulf_%28LSE_RO%29.pdf to http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/32743/1/Nixon%2C_Kissinger%2C_and_the_Shah_the_origins_of_Iranian_primacy_in_the_Persian_Gulf_%28LSE_RO%29.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Iran–United Kingdom relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131206505500/http://www.tehrantimes.com/politics/109733-britain-says-open-to-better-relations-with-iran- to http://tehrantimes.com/politics/109733-britain-says-open-to-better-relations-with-iran-
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:43, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: One of the key points regarding current Anglo-Iranian relations is that of the detention of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe - should this page not at least reference Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe and perhaps the 1971 arms deal as well? 84.13.36.104 (talk) 17:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe seems to be a big omission  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.152.152 (talk) 11:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Zaghari-Ratcliffe