lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Kiss (1896 film)

message: The version of The Kiss I saw in film class was about 15 second song, and it was quite different than the one linked at the bottom of the page to the Library of Congress.
Was the version of The Kiss I saw from Edison?  The image yuo have here on the site is from the one I saw in class, not from the one I saw on the linked site.
I think this needs to be cleared up. —This unsigned comment was added by 136.160.131.176 (talk • contribs) .
: Hmm, there seem to be two very similar movies both in IMDB: 'The Kiss' (1896) and 'The Kiss' (1900).  Both of them seem to have been filmed for Edison.
:The IMDB entry for the second seems a bit lacking, however.  It only lists one actor, Fred Ott, but I think he needed a co-star! --Saforrest 00:14, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I see a huge problem here

message: Saw someone point this out in a blogpost wherein they dug into the origins of much of the purported 'controversy' over the film itself. Here's a quote from The Chap Book, cited in - and I haven't looked yet, but I will assume - many sources as evidence of outrage over the film:
Okay, cut and dry. Right?
Okay... here's a longer version of the first quote:
And, as the author of the blogpost deciphers:
I'm sorry for the long quotes here - but my point comes to:
There's details later on in the blogpost covering reactions from religious groups, although the author points out that evidence of condemnation there is also a little scant on the ground, with one church at least showing it as part of a fundraiser.
Whenever I've got the time, I'll be combing over the sources used in this article under the 'Reaction' section as best I can, and seeing how many may cite The Chap Book somewhat wrongly. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) 09:38, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 'Reaction' section may need a comb-over, as the film may not have been that controversial 

message: Appear to be conflicting info as to where it was shot. Djflem (talk) 18:34, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That was an odd thing I found too and I spent my time searching to figure out why. It would be odd that The Kiss, an 1896 film, would be one of the last shot at the Black Maria, which closed in 1901, but the film was remade in 1900 so maybe it is in reference to that. Jon698 (talk) 21:41, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Maria or Edison Studios?
Talk:Woman of the Year

message: How many languages does Hepburn's character speak? I could hear at least English, German, French, Spanish, Russian and Greek throughout the movie. Amazing feat (although the American accent clearly shines through). 惑乱 分からん * \)/ (\ (< \) (2 /) /)/ * (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Polyglotte?

message: Um... Could someone please put a section in called "Plot". I think it might just be important. (I haven't watched the film so I can't)Hannahcronin (talk) 12:03, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: Problems preventing the article from achieving B-Class: (note that these are just some of the problems, and the list below is not exhaustive)
* Referencing & citations: This article clearly lacks citations on important information in the "Background and product" and "Awards and honors" sections. Try to find more reliable sources to refer to.
* Coverage: Many important information is lacking. (Eg: how was the film received by critics and the public, the film's release information)
* Structure: Can follow more closely to Wikipedia:MOSFILM. Some paragraphs are also too short. Try to expand or merge them.
Good job so far. Keep up the good work!--Lionratz (talk) 02:33, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Review

message: "Thompson was the inspiration for Katharine Hepburn’s role of Tess Keating in the 1942 movie Woman of the Year. She also inspired her husband of that time, Sinclair Lewis, to write the novel It Can’t Happen Here." https://www.concordmonitor.com/Dorothy-Thompson-and-fascism-27554979  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:8109:B00:4776:50FB:BF7:6F6A:18CB (talk) 17:43, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Inspiration
Talk:Let's All Go to the Lobby

message: Is it really copyrighted still? I can't find any evidence of this, but I didn't look hard. No visible copyright notice that I can see.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lm6IU6V-dE8
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_in_the_public_domain_in_the_United_States#Determining_copyright_registration Anonymous-232 (talk) 03:41, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you tried looking in the lobby @User:Anonymous-232 Stephanie921 (talk) 02:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really copyrighted? 

message: List the short being in the prologue to Jurassic World Dominion? 174.24.104.56 (talk) 16:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not mentioned in that article, not sure it should be mentioned in this one. Are there any sources indicating its importance in the film? – Reidgreg (talk) 21:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  JWD 

message: It doesn't feel like this should be italicized. Seems to fit the definition of WP:MINORWORK more. InfiniteNexus (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me that the article subject is a short film, and short films get italics (MOS:ITALICTITLE).  It is a standalone work and not part of a larger work.  Although, perhaps its alternate title – Technicolor Refreshment Trailer No. 1 – the No. 1 could suggest that it is part of a series and should then be styled in double quotes. I have seen this where an advertising campaign will get italics while individual ads for the campaign (sometimes for different media) will get double quotes.  However, other possible titles in a hypothetical Technicolor Refreshment Trailer series may no longer exist, and sources generally treat Let's All Go to the Lobby on its own. Nothing I've read discusses it as part of a series. The next-best known film of this type would be another of Fleischer's, a later, longer one used at intermission in drive-ins (several minutes long with a countdown to the next film.) – Reidgreg (talk) 07:32, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm ... I guess it's debatable whether an advertisement/commercial would be classified as a short film (a major work) or a video (a minor work). InfiniteNexus (talk) 08:22, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italics
Talk:Love Finds Andy Hardy

message: Word count of the plot summary as of 2022, May, is  808 words.
WP:Manual of Style/Film § Plot (MOS:PLOT) suggests that plot summaries for feature films be between 400 and 700 words. There were 808 words to the plot summary. This appears to be slightly more than 700 words, certainly not excessive, but definitely more than the suggested maximum of 700 words. 
When attempt was made to remove tag without any action or explanation the tag was immediately restored. 
A good suggestion would be to trim at least 108 words from the current summary.
69.112.129.186 (talk) 15:01, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long Plot Tag
Talk:Regeneration (1915 film)

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Regeneration (1915).webm, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 28, 2025. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2025-12-28. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 22:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:The Tall T

message: I've seen the film, and can't figure it out. Is it a reference to the 6'2" Scott's body shape? WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 14:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As I recall, though it's not mentioned in the dialog itself, it's the name of Tenvoorde's ranch, where Scott loses his horse early in the film.  Monkeyzpop (talk) 20:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What does the title mean?
Talk:Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter?

message: The stage version, possibly, but the movie was a notorious bomb. 
"In keeping with George S. Kaufman’s maxim that 'satire is what closes on Saturday night,' Rock Hunter flopped at the box office and was disastrous for Tashlin’s career." - Jonathan Rosenbaum
Danwroy (talk) 01:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "Will Success Spoil Rock Hunter? was a runaway success."
Talk:It (1927 film)

message: ... rather than just a teaser would be nice.  Thanks, Maikel (talk) 11:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Full plot

message: What does "it" refer to in the movie and novel? It doesn't seem to be glamour. Maikel (talk) 11:44, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the article on Elinor Glyn which has a slightly more extensive explanation if the one in this article is insufficient for you to get it. Mike Hayes (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: It

message: The opening title of the film is "it" (lowercase letters in double quotation marks). The title on the poster is 'IT' (uppercase letters with single quotation marks). The novella is also called "It". The British edition was called "It" and other stories and the title page is "IT" AND OTHER STORIES.(see:"It" and Other Stories, Stanford University Libraries) Whichever way, the quotation marks are an inherent part of the original title and should not be omitted. The article should also be moved to the correct name. If there are no objections, I intend to do so but I will leave the subject open for discussion. I have moved a few articles in the past that were misnamed without getting a consensus and no one has reverted them but this is a famous subject, so I am being (perhaps unnecessarily) more cautious. The other question is whether the title should be lowercase. Possibly not, as the producers used different combinations and seem to have been not quite sure themselves. Mike Hayes (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: ''"It"'' not ''It''
Talk:Memphis Belle

message: This article has two topics:  The 1944 documentary, which should have it's own article called Memphis Belle: A Story of a Flying Fortress, and the aircraft itself, which should be called Memphis Belle (B-17) or Memphis Belle (aircraft).  This article Memphis Belle, should then become a disambiguation page for the two films and the aircraft articles.  --rogerd 16:38, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just completed it and redirected all of the other links to one of these articles or Memphis Belle (film)--rogerd 00:22, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  split
Talk:The Miracle of Morgan's Creek

message: Wikipedia is not IMDb, and should not be coy about how this film resolves things. —12.72.71.22 (talk) 17:46, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So, write something. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 20:48, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Coy

message: On a higher resolution HD screen, as some people now have, can the newspaper headlines now be read to produce a date?
The only date I am able to make out is on the Chinese newspaper where it reads:
 六
 月
 十
 四
 日
which is to say, 六月十四日, June 14. Varlaam (talk) 17:17, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the actual date of birth?
Talk:The Palm Beach Story

message: I've done a fair amount of work on expanding this article, including putting in additional images.  One of the problems with film articles is that presenting the cast as a list, really the best way to do it, creates a lot of whitespace to the right.  That's why I like to put images there, if I can find them and make a rationale for their use.  The problem with putting them all the way to the right, however, is that if the plot section isn't long enough to push the cast section down below the infobox, the images will force the cast section down, thus introducing even worse whitespace between the "Cast" header and the cast information.  This may be ne evident when you view the image under a smaller resolution monitor, but with a sidescreen monitor (where the plot text takes up even less vertical space) it's quite evident.  This is why when I make those kinds of changes, I check them under both monitors settings to ake sure they work -- the goal being to have the article not have interruptive blocks of whitespace in it.User:Hru692 has been removing the formatting I've used to create this balanced presentation, thus creating one where under widescreen, disruptive whitespace is created.  I've asked the editor to discuss it on their talk page, but I've received no answer.  I'll post this message both on the article's talk page and on User:Hru692's talk page in the hope that the editor will come to understand the purpose of the formatting, and will stop reverting it. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 02:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the placement of images in this article
Talk:The Thin Blue Line (1988 film)

message: Shouldn't there be some discussion of the films style?  It's got what seems to be a very striking style, particularly the vivid recreations.  I think it's also noteworthy that the one scenario the film makers don't show recreated is the one which they believe happened.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.221.152 (talk) 02:11, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Style?

message: The film was not allowed to be entered into the "Best Documentary Feature" catagory at the Hollywood Academy Awards because of Morris' (restrained) use of "dramatic re-enactments." I'll try to find some citable statement to this effect (it was widely reported at the time, hence my giving it as a flat fact), but I am nowhere near a sizable library, and ask others who are to see if they can come up with something. Thank you. --Ted Watson (talk) 19:46, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Awards"

message: 05:21pm. If they want to a drive-in movie double header, it would start a little after sunset, and end probably three or four hours later. Not at midnight, six hours later. (72.228.168.195 (talk) 10:21, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time of sunset on Thanskgiving in Dallas
Talk:Werner Herzog Eats His Shoe

message: Just curious, but why is the photo all in B&W except for the beer bottle? --Chinawhitecotton 19:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: This article is complete, it just needs inline cites.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.196.137.27 (talk) 19:13, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Why a stub?

message: ...to Fassbinder's Ali: Fear Eats the Soul (sole)? WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 15:23, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Is the title a joking reference...
Talk:Pyrography

message: I am planning on making my own pyrography tool out of some nichrome (heating) wire and a 10 watt lamp for power control. I hope I don't hurt myself! Anyone know anything relevant??? Lotusduck 01:37, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

message: The first external link in the list, Information on Pyrographic Machines, is misleading. Instead it leads to the sight of the manufacturer of a single type of machine. MagiMaster (talk) 06:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: I'm a novice and bought a gas operated soldering iron that works quite well for me.
I'd like some pointers to websites that offer free images that I can use for pyrography  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.8.254.130 (talk) 22:35, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Isn't laser-etching of wood a form or pyrography?  If so, it's the ultimate modern way to do this stuff. SteveBaker (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laser cutting.
Talk:Burden of Dreams

message: I just stumbled onto this page and am wondering why the whole article is about the film being a film verite film?  No synopsis or anything.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.82.250.131 (talk) 03:56, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't really about the movie 

message: So, now that User:Gilliesz has kindly added information directly pertaining to the movie, would anyone object if we scrapped most of the material about whether or not Blank is a cinema verité filmmaker? It has very little bearing on Burden of Dreams but as things currently stand, it takes up the first several paragraphs, after which the description of the production of the film comes off as more of an after-thought. We could probably jump right from the first paragraph to the sixth and have a shorter but more on-point article about the film. That said, I would certainly be amenable to salvaging content from the fifth paragraph, where it manages to bear on the production. Do people have opinions on the subject? Tigercompanion25 (talk) 18:52, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections at all, had been meaning to remove that myself one of these days. The Interior (Talk) 01:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ideas for Reshaping the Article
Talk:List of University of Colorado Boulder alumni

message: this should be people as its not just alumni but staff as well.--Levineps (talk) 01:21, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Hall, Cornell, and Wieman are professors/instructors/adjuncts of CU. Not alumni. Steve8675309 (talk) 02:20, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Change name

message: There are no citations or even references to support the content of this article.1archie99 (talk) 21:00, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: No references or citations.
Talk:All My Babies

message: I change the film year. It was filmed in 1952.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.236.141.35 (talk) 03:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:How to Marry a Millionaire

message: it is actually the second film in CinemaScope the first was The Robe.
: read up, it was the first filmed in CinemaScope but the second one released, you can read this in every book that mention the first CS movies. Dollvalley 15:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CinemaScope

message: The page described this film as a "romantic comedy". It's actually widely known as a screwball comedy; WP's page on the genre even cites it as an example. Cheers! – AndyFielding (talk) 13:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's a screwball comedy 

message: This derogatory word bears examination. Were there no "gold hoarders," there would be no "gold diggers." In other words, had men not kept all the wealth for themselves, women would have not need to look for it in their male partners. We could even say that gold diggers were the smart ones, replying on a primal survival mechanism. 2001:861:5E49:DF60:7D15:E312:784B:CC1A (talk) 11:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  gold diggers
Talk:Dil Pickles

message: I don't think it is necessary to provide so much information on Tara Strong in the voice section of this article and come to think of it we probably don't even need a voice section in this article in the first place. This article is about the fictional character Dil Pickles, not Tara Strong, I suggest we simply provide a link so readers can find whatever information they're looking for on Tara Strong all in one place. Eatspie (talk) 04:38, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Irrelevant Information

message: Just to reference the statment made in article that Dils hat is a Sherpa hat...
Although it states on some fan websites that Dils hat is Bolivian, Dil actually states in the episode 'A DeVille House Divided' that his hat is a Sherpa hat. 195.93.21.101 11:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dil's hat: Sherpa or Bolivian?

message: I had to say something about this; one of the most common attitudes about Rugrats among people my age (16-18) is that Rugrats was a great show, a classic, until Dil came along and then it was just commercialism and "toilet humor"
Kimi absolutely ruined it, but Dil was the turning point.
--Froth 02:11, 20 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  jumped the shark 

message: do they really have to add "species" to the character profile?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.102.218.106 (talk) 08:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You make a good point. However, the series has a slight sci-fi theme and aliens have been know to appear. So its probably best to point out which characters are human and which are not. TheProf07 (talk) 11:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species 

message: Could the origin of Dil's nickname for Angelica be a reference to the fact that Angelica is the bully of the babies and the only main character who can talk to the adults?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.29.36 (talk) 21:57, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm... It probably is because as a baby he can sense a "bad" person. However, i don't believe its notable enough to be mentioned in the article.  TheProf  |  Talk  19:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Yucky/Yacky

message: Heh... little Stephen Speilberg reference there. Anyway, I know that Dil got to meet and interact with real alien life in one episode, and though the rest of the gang didn't see them, they were presented with enough evidence to know the encounter was real. But does anyone remember which episode that was? DanMat6288 (talk) 14:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that was series 1 episode 11 "Tommy Foolery". The existence of alien life within the continuity of All Grown Up! was also suggested in "Izzy or Isnt He", "R.V. Having Fun Yet" and "Brothers Grimm". In fact, I'm sure there are many more references in the show! TheProf - T / C 15:35, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dil's Close Encounter of the Third Kind 

message: Actually, I think it was never that the twins dropped Dil. They THOUGHT they did when they were babies. They were trying to get him out of the computer and they dropped it. Anyone else remember that episode? 24.12.166.210 (talk) 23:46, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dil being dropped
Talk:The Bad and the Beautiful

message: Not sure where I'm supposed to post this so feel free to move it. The author of the story that this film is based upon is listed as George Bradshaw, however the Academy Awards page lists it as Charles Bradshaw. I can't find definite confirmation either way.
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academy_Award_for_Best_Writing_%28Adapted_Screenplay%29#1950s
Pentarix (talk) 14:15, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  it's George... just viewed the film last night. 76.218.248.127 (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

message: for me that was part of the 'fun' of this movie... 
the Von Ellstein character i always thought was director von Stroheim.. perhaps not?
in the case of a Judy Garland-ese character, one can easily be seen and HEARD during the crashed party scene.. sitting as she was known to do, near the piano, singing singing singing..
and of course the use of Leo G. Carroll is no surprise, almost a compliment.. as Mr Carroll had by that time worked w/ Hitch on at least 4 films.. the female companion giving her unsolicited opinion, a dead give-away.
: and finally this film released in 1952 appears same time as release of two other classics, re: the industry: 'All About Eve' and 'Sunset Boulevard'. 76.218.248.127 (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real-life personalities!!
Talk:Endless Summer

message: Page was a redirect, and is now a disambig; I assume that the Wikifilms template was intended for The Endless Summer, which has one anyway. Fourohfour 17:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A bit late, but yes, there was a cut-and-paste move from this article to that one. I've moved all the corresponding edits to their respective article and talk pages. Graham87 12:28, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikifilms template
Talk:State Road 974 (Florida)

message: If there is a redirect from State Road 974 (Florida) to State Road 990 (Florida), it would make sense to have some mention of the connection in the SR 990 page. 147.70.242.21 01:43, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll get to it in time. It would be faster if I didn't have to revert your stuff. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 02:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)