Talk:Nanosensor

message: I put in the "attention" because the article is speculation on something that "may exist in the future." Also, there are no references available to check on the facts presented.
:Joe 1/2/2006
I second the "attention" status--according to the glutamic acid article, a team at Stanford has already developed a nanosensor, therefore seeming to make it more than just speculation.  I admittedly am not conversant with this topic, but the two articles contradict each other.Muskrat Collective 14:27, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous Discussions 

message: The definitions and examples given in this article are hardly satisfying. This may be due to a misunderstanding on my part of what exactly defines a nanosensor, so I'm hoping this generates discussion on this matter.
First 2 sentences: "Nanosensors are any biological, chemical, or physical sensory points used to convey information about nanoparticles to the macroscopic world. Though humans have not yet been able to synthesize nanosensors, predictions for their use mainly include various medicinal purposes and as gateways to building other nanoproducts, such as computer chips that work at the nanoscale and nanorobots."
Firstly, nanoparticles specifically refer to small, particulate clusters of molecules. Individual molecules are not nanoparticles. My understanding was that nanosensors are nano-sized detectors (the nano- prefix is given due to the size of the device, and not necessarily the analyte) that are often used to detect small quantities of analyte, such as the amounts found in an individual cell. As such, nanosensors have to be extremely sensitive, often down to the single-molecule level. Their small size allows nanosensors to detect analytes that are localized to a small volume.
Secondly, examples are given later in the article of supposed artificial nanosensors already in existence. This contradicts the statement that humans haven't been able to synthesize nanosensors.
The other problem I have with this article are the examples. The sense of smell should not count as a nanosensor. Plenty of artificial devices already exist that can, for example, "sniff" the air for all types of different analytes. This is hardly unique/new/distinct. Our noses detect molecules (which aren't nanoparticles) but noses are still macroscopic. I guess you could argue that the individual chemoreceptors in our olfactory cells function as biological nanosensors. The sense of smell as a whole, though, should not count.
Tiny photosensitive chips should also not count as nanosensors. There's nothing distinct about them other than that they are tiny. I think we should add an extra criterion for determining whether something constitutes a nanosensor: that the small size of the detector is a necessary property exploited in the detection of its analyte. By this criterion, tiny photosensitive chips would not be nanosensors because a bigger chip could accomplish the same task. However, the nanotube-based detectors of gases does qualify because the size and unique properties of the nanotubes are a necessary component of the detection system. By this definition, even the olfactory chemoreceptors of our noses wouldn't count, because a hypothetical macroscopic version could accomplish the same task.
142.103.207.10 22:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What exactly is a nanosensor? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Nanosensor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928025856/http://bentham.org/nanotec/ to http://bentham.org/nanotec/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071112191136/http://www.ncd.gov:80/newsroom/publications/2006/emerging_trends.htm to http://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/publications/2006/emerging_trends.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:50, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Nanosensor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110714152835/http://www.nanoandsociety.com/framing/papers/NanotechSocietal.pdf to http://www.nanoandsociety.com/framing/papers/NanotechSocietal.pdf
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110614142313/http://www.law.ualberta.ca/centres/hli/userfiles/12-3-09MacDonald.pdf to http://www.law.ualberta.ca/centres/hli/userfiles/12-3-09MacDonald.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified