Talk:1967–1970

message: The articles for these two compilations include a paragraph that is identical in both, with this sentence:
: Even though the group had had success with cover versions of songs, most notably with "Twist and Shout," which made #2 on the Billboard charts, only songs composed by the Beatles themselves were included.
While this sentence is appropriate for the first compilation, I'm not sure it's necessary for this article, as I don't think the Beatles recorded any cover versions of similarly great importance during the time period covered by this album. If they did, then a different example should be substituted here. Richard K. Carson 05:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover versions? 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The Beatles 1967-1970 → 1967-1970 — correct name of album (except for use of hyphen instead of en dash, per WP:DASH#Dash guidelines for Wikipedia editors) —PEJL 19:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
* Oppose rename to 1967-1970 (The Beatles) instead, and rename the related to 1962-1966 (The Beatles). 70.55.86.83 14:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Any additional comments:
As evidence in support of the move, 1962-1966 is already sans "The Beatles." —  AjaxSmack    22:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Yeah, but I moved it just before I proposed this move (not knowing this move was blocked by edit history). --PEJL 23:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My bust.  I didn't check the edit history but the move is still a good idea.  —  AjaxSmack    18:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 20:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
* Oppose rename to 1967-1970 (The Beatles) instead, and rename the related to 1962-1966 (The Beatles). 70.55.86.83 14:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Any additional comments:
As evidence in support of the move, 1962-1966 is already sans "The Beatles." —  AjaxSmack    22:53, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but I moved it just before I proposed this move (not knowing this move was blocked by edit history). --PEJL 23:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My bust.  I didn't check the edit history but the move is still a good idea.  —  AjaxSmack    18:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 20:57, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.blender.com/guide/reviews.aspx?id=2958
** In 1967–1970 on 2011-05-25 04:00:07, 404 Not Found
** In 1967–1970 on 2011-06-06 13:45:36, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 13:46, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: The red album article has version or at least mix information of songs for the different releases. Any idea what the versions/mixes for songs might used in releases of this one? —84.250.167.86 (talk) 12:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mix information? 

message: Substituted at 01:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on 1967–1970. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111107224423/http://infodisc.fr/Album_B.php to http://infodisc.fr/Album_B.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1967–1970. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121027132903/http://www.infodisc.fr/B-CD_1973.php to http://www.infodisc.fr/B-CD_1973.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150110091234/http://www.riaj.or.jp/issue/record/1996/199611.pdf to http://www.riaj.or.jp/issue/record/1996/199611.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1967–1970. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090203101410/http://www.blender.com/guide/reviews.aspx?id=2958 to http://www.blender.com/guide/reviews.aspx?id=2958
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121027221755/http://www.infodisc.fr/CDCertif_P2.php?debut=14 to http://www.infodisc.fr/CDCertif_P2.php?debut=14
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:07, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I came to know the Beatles at the age of 7 (1976 in Germany),
to us, me and my much older sisters it was "the red records" i.e "die rote Platten" and "the blue records" i.e. "die blaue Platten" , especialy because there were a third one "the white" album.
thought it to be expedient to name records by colors.
someone told me later that both of it is a collection of singles (small records).
as child I sometimes wondered why someone would sell the same song twice,
the first time as small record, and then again as a biger 'normal' record.
Mainly because the big records are much better, because there's more music to listen to. Is it fair to do so ? (childish thinking is straight forward).I think names like "red album" and "blue album" could also be known globaly
But probably it would be good to use the title that was used by the producer, and mention the colors in the text of the article.
LG 
bad english I know,
bear with me
MWS 2.207.24.185 (talk) 15:40, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you looked at the articles? The articles already name the albums by color. Sundayclose (talk) 18:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "red album and blue album - titles and names we use 

message: See Talk:1962–1966#Deluxe track listing
Tedster41 (talk) 09:13, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deluxe track listing 

message: Hello,
 
Here are the certifications of 1962-1966
 
in the United States (RIAA) : 15× Platinum 15,000,000
 
and
 
1967-1970
 
17× Platinum 8,500,000
 
Both albums were originally double albums published on the same day.
 
How the 1967-1970 US sales (8,500,000) can be lower than the 1962-1966 US sales 15,000,000 whereas the former was granted more RIAA certifications : 17 platinum versus 15 platinum ?
 
Something is clearly incoherent. Carlo Colussi (talk) 12:19, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Because one is using actual sales (8.5m copies of a double album) vs. how the certification is calculated. Sell 7.5m copies of a double album, then RIAA considers it 15x Platinum. Kevin Crossman (talk) 00:51, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Certifications in the USA of 1962-1966 and 1967-1970 albums are not coherent