lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cucumber soup

message: The article says regional. What region? Copyedited the recipe too, for my Polish friends. Dr. Dan 03:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's known throughout Poland, and quite different from cucumber soups I have seen elsewhere. Guess you could say it's part of traditional polish cuisine :). LOL on seeing such an article in English wiki :D - Anonymous 13:44, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What Region

message: I'm a bit confused.  The lede says it is made from "sour salted cucumber" but then the article goes on to say there are two varieties: one from fresh and one from pickled cucumbers.  I presume "sour salted" is how they get "pickled" but I don't think you can get "fresh" cucumbers from "sour salted" ones.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is it? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. per consensus and WP:UE (closed by non-admin page mover) echidnaLives - talk - edits 06:17, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Cucumber soup →  – The article is about the Polish/Lithuanian soup. Scudsvlad (talk) 21:20, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

text: queried move request Happily888 (talk) 00:00, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 December 2022
Talk:Renaissance literature

message: This article misses the greatest renaissance countries, such as England and Italy, and discusses only the minor ones. I believe that some most important details should be added. Samrica 07:19, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Dante Alighieri was a figure of the 14th century, and that means that Renaissance literature would have begun in the 14th century. Classicalfan2 (talk) 02:07, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Dante? 

message: The references and links appear to be neutral and informative, I initially thought one of the citations was out of date, but after double checking they checked out okay OGCollin (talk) 02:42, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems Legit
Talk:Microwave chemistry

message: It would be interesting to provide some specific examples where the microwave method has improved the selectivity, yield, or rate. Perhaps something like:
X and Y (reference) reacted A and B with microwave heating to obtain C with 96% yield of the trans product, compared to 70% yield for the thermal reaction at 120oC.   Dirac66 (talk) 16:16, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added link to a lab course using microwave technology including an syntheses by classical methods and the same syntheses done by microwave technology. Krakatit (talk) 15:19, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples needed
Talk:Virino

message: There is no concensus that prions do cause disease a large minority still holds to the virus theory of "prion illnesses." Until it is decided definitively you cannot make such claims as fact and both sides need to be presented. 
2602:306:CE96:AD70:3961:DB85:4F63:2EB9 (talk) 14:08, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Prions not universally accepted

message: This article doesn't make it clear that the virino concept is no longer a mainstream theory - prions are well established as protein-only agents. Prion strain is explained as a property of the protein's conformation. Also the article is incorrect in saying that the existence of strain proves that prions are information carrying - in mammals there is no evidence for that. The definition of strain in prion disease is based on the pathology - ie what bit of the brain it damages - and biochemical properties. --Purple 03:52, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Virinos - a historical theory 

message: I'm not sure including discussion of the central dogma in the section about how the Virino theory was developed is necessary or even accurate. It's possible that more citations are required and that this is in fact pertinent to the subject, but within the one article originally cited there is no mention of the central dogma. I know that there were other researchers who wrote in support of the virino but I just don't know that any of them mentioned the central dogma.  Notaneldrichhorror (talk) 22:41, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central Dogma
Talk:Margie Profet

message: This article lacks any actual information. All it says is that she studied SOMETHING about morning sickness that involves evolution, and that others opposed her because she didn't have high enough degrees. Without at least a few details about her research, this article is useless. Adam Cuerden 03:54, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: She may or may not be actually missing. Is it true? Can someone verify this with a credible source? --黒雲 user:Qaddosh (talk) 08:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I just deleted the unsourced sentence "She has been a missing person since 2004." per WP:BLP#Reliable sources  203.189.129.129 (talk) 09:08, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is She Missing? 
Talk:Fore people

message: Remarks on Fore: This is unclear and imprecise, and an arrogent approch, refusing a name place for hundreds of years to be clearly visible. You are refusing  individuals an alternative and existing definition to what Fore means by annexing this to a sub-titled page annexed to one side. YOUR PAGE IS THEREFORE NOT HELPFUL to those searching for more current and more relevant information to them than Fore/Kuru. Please do something that is satisfactory, before it becomes necessay to call an arbitrator. For your benefit, you are invited to investigate the different beauties and realities of FORE upon google, hopefully you will open to another reality. Merry season of Christmas. Peter Gavigan —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter gavigan (talk • contribs) 
:My dear friend... please calm down! What do you mean exactly? The fact that there is a Fore Abbey and Village in Ireland? Is that it? Well... there are several solutions to this disambiguation problem. One is to keep as is, that is to say, with a link to Fore Abbey in Fore (disambiguation) (already done it). Another, that implies more work, is to make Fore a disambiguation page that links to all the articles listed in Fore (disambiguation), renaming the present Fore article into Fore (people) or Fore (Papua New Guinea). You could also move the present Fore article to one of the ones I just mentioned and then make Fore a redirect page to Fore (disambiguation). I'll do that then. Please, Peter, signed your talk with four tilds (4 times ~). Seasons Greetings! The Ogre 17:26, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done it! The Ogre 17:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dab problems

message: Under the History heading, there is a sentence that I find difficult to comprehend (in bold):
What does "under control" mean here?  Does it simply mean people lived there? Or were the people there fighting less?  Or were the patrol officers exerting power over the inhabitants?  Or... ?  Does anyone know what this clause is stating?  MisterDub (talk) 18:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: By "under control," I meant under the control of the Australian government. I'll clarify that in the article.-Schnurrbart (talk) 23:04, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Region under control?
Talk:Ian Gibson (comics)

message: The last thing listed in 2008. Has he done anything since then ? -- Beardo (talk) 14:27, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current work
Talk:New South Wales Endeavour railcar

message: "They are notorious for their poor reliability."
Does anyone have a source for this? I know that they can break down, but that is not a usual occurence. The trains were only made about 10 or so years ago - unlike some Cityrail stock made 40 years ago. Deleted until someone finds a source. (JROBBO 04:09, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't there be a common summary article about CityRail sets, and all existing pages named in a standard fashion e.g. by their letter codes or names e.g. V-Set (CityRail) (or DDIU (CityRail)), T-Set (CityRail) (or Tangara (CityRail), Endeavour (CityRail) etc? The current array is pretty messy and there is no table to link them all together as per the CityTrain, Connex Melbourne and other Australian systems. SM247 20:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organisation of CityRail rollingstock articles 

message: I note that the article has a photo in it.  Should the photo request now be removed? --Athol Mullen 00:16, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo request? 

message: Why is a Endeavour Railcar 2506 Cab View not relevant to an article on  Endeavour Railcar and editors revert to their own photographs ? Hpeterswald (talk) 08:10, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cab View Photograph Removed
Talk:Sword of Gideon

message: Having just read the book "Vengeance: The True Story of an Israeli Counter-Terrorist Team" by George Jonas, I find the characterization of it, in the brief on "Sword of Gideon", as "...a fictionalized account of the incident.", to be judgemental rather than factual.  If the characterization was an impartial statement more along the lines of "...an account of the incident which has been criticized as fictional, as well as having attacted compliments from knowledgeable commentators..." it would be more appropriate.  The fact of the matter is that for "Black Ops", a narrative such as this can likely never be proved nor disproved in its entirety, as George Jonas himself has said in effect and in much more detail within the book itself. --RCopple 04:12, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I'll change it a bit. Joshdboz 14:06, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I hope you don't mind that I used some of your wording in my edit.  Please change as you see fit. Joshdboz 14:11, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Book

message: "Michael Bay To Produce Gideon's sword!".Nemissimo (talk) 14:51, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael Bay To Produce Gideon's sword?
Talk:A. J. Croce

message: This A.J. Croce article says that A.J. is the only child of Jim Croce, but the Jim Croce article talks about a daughter. Can anyone clear this up? Moleskiner 04:14, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: What is the preferred pronunciation of this musician's surname?  The most accurate way to pronounce it in English is "CROW-chay", but many Americans wrongly pronounce it "CROW-chee."  The problem with this is that "CROW-chee" is written in Italian as C-R-O-C-I, not C-R-O-C-E.  The confusion is caused by the fact that American English is very lazy about the pronunciation of vowels.  By comparison Italian vowels are always short, crisp, distinct, and consistent.  There is no confusion of how to pronounce the name in Italian only in English.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.224.57.157 (talk) 01:09, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ask Joey Vento, Philadelphia's expert in English and Italian linguistics.  108.127.246.148 (talk) 12:05, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The definitive answer on how to pronounce "Croce" comes from any member of the Croce family.  Jim, Ingrid, and A.J. also pronounce it "CROW-chee".  It's their neame, so they get to pronounce it any way that they see fit, regardless of any 'standard' or 'accurate' pronouncement of others.  There is no confusion in any language, because it is not a vocabulary word -- it's a proper name. 152.17.129.250 (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: I just added the POV-check tag.  I am new to the Wikipedia community, so I am not sure which exact policy this article is violating...but some sections of it read like they were written by A.J. or a close family member, which seems wrong. Longjumpingarugula (talk) 19:37, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Ingrid, in the past few years, has taken to sullying Croce's reputation in books and interviews.  She has lied about other things over the years, such as AJ's "brain tumor".  His blindness was the result of beatings from a boyfriend Ingrid had (some say husband that is never mentioned).  She lied about not getting royalties and she's lied about the musicians that worked for Croce.  I'd take anything she says with a grain of salt.75.161.6.0 (talk) 18:08, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Ingrid=
Talk:Derry (Stephen King)

message: the red apple is a shop that apears on Insomniaand, even if it doesnt play a key role on it, it is a  place there Windymager 23:07, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Must put about the "red apple" 

message: What are the sources for this article?67.101.251.129 (talk) 04:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: I have IT on talking book, and I thought the standpipe held 1.75 million gallons of water.  Can anyone with a print version of the book confirm this? (Best bet is during the description of the storm near the end of the book.)
152.131.9.8 (talk) 06:45, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standpipe Capacity? 

message: I'd like to move this to Derry, Maine, but that's a bit too controversial to do without asking first. What do other people think?--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move suggestion
Talk:California tree frog

message: This species is currently placed in the genus Pseudacris, as Pseudacris cadaverina, the California Chorus Frog.  MFuture 04:23, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomy 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jadeballeza (talk) 06:06, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History
Talk:Canyon, California

message: The coordinates given for Canyon are probably wrong.  Google Earth places these coordinates at 6700 Aitken Dr, Piedmont, CA 94611.  I don't know what the right coordinates are, but they are probably something like 37.821481°,-122.154110°
Jonrysh (talk) 19:31, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad coordinates 
Talk:Edwin (musician)

message: Can someone add a section about his background. Where is he from? What is his full name? How old is he? Married? etc. etc. Please!  --Mezaco 05:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Background

message: I'm not sure about the procedure for defunct websites, but it seems as though since Edwin's website is no longer up that it should be removed from the links section (the article even states that the site is now defunct).  I am removing it for now, but please feel free to respond if you believe it should re-instated. AddMan3001 (talk) 19:32, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct website 

message: Does anyone know what Edwin's last name is?
99.238.50.110 (talk) 22:02, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last name 

message: The paragraph on Crash Karma is out of date - their album has been released.  Should be updated to reflect this. 74.14.224.102 (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crash Karma 
Talk:Joiner

message: "The most famous Carpenter and Joiner in the Uk is Keith O' Brien who has trained many apprentices over the years in Bristol."  This is surely advertising? No evidence for the claim.Bonjedward (talk) 18:34, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I support the statement that this term is obsolete in the US.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rondo66 (talk • contribs) 17:02, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Obsolete terminology
Talk:Aerocapture

message: Any more detail from Aerobraking that really belongs here? Very illustrative picture. MFago 04:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Aerocapture

message: Can we have some of the math on this and a lot more detail? Gingermint (talk) 04:16, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Math

message: The text in the picture doesn't render properly with my browser, I'm using chrome v9.0.597.98 on windows 7. I guess it's because it's an .svg, but the letters are scrunched together and pretty much unreadable, anyone able to fix this? Larryisgood (talk) 15:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture doesn't render properly 

message: Aerocapture#In_fiction
: Aerocapture within fiction can be read in Arthur C. Clarke's novel 2010: Odyssey Two, in which two spacecraft (one Russian, one Chinese) both use aerocapture in Jupiter's atmosphere to shed their excess velocity and position themselves for exploring Jupiter's satellites. This can be seen as a special effect in the movie version (created by MGM/released by Warner Home Video) in which only a Russian spacecraft undergoes aerocapture (in the film incorrectly called aerobraking), which is demonstrated via special effects.
If they are using aerocapture in Jupiter's atmosphere, they will land on Jupiter's surface. If they are using it on the atmosphere of one of Jupiter's satellites, they will land on that satellite. I haven't seen it, but I'm guessing they are actually using aerobraking on Jupiter's surface, and another method (aerocapture or whatever) to land on its satellite to explore it. Does anyone agree this is indeed correctly called aerobraking, and that the paragraph doesn't even belong in this article? D. F. Schmidt (talk) 03:01, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrectly called aerobraking?
Talk:Dado (joinery)

message: This article should be called "trench." What is the basis for choosing "dado" over "trench" or "housing?"
80.111.192.198 (talk) 23:04, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

message: Curious as to what’s meant here. This is an English word, so does this mean another word using the UK, and also Ireland and small English-speaking territories, where ‘housing’ is just in the UK alone? Or somehow a more general European word, which seems unusual? 2603:7000:2F02:5E65:54B5:F616:D58:C35A (talk) 05:41, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trench (‘Europe’)
Talk:Miter joint

message: I'm a very amateur carpenter, but I belive a miter joint is actually weaker than a butt joint, because--although there is greater glued surface--both peices are joined at the end grain. At any rate, it's such a weak joint by itself, that strength is hardly a distinguishing factor when compared to any joint. I'll make some edits to reflect this opinion. Tafinucane 19:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. It is the weakest joint. This article needs a good work over including the use of splines, keys etc. Have been meaning to get to it. SilentC 22:49, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article used to say that all miter joints were weak, compared to alternative joints.  However, the  current source only discusses woodworking joints.  What about welded (steel, aluminium, ...) joints?  I've found various claims that a miter weld is stronger than a butt weld, but I've only found unreliable sources so far.
I updated the article to avoid making any claim about the strength of welded metal joints.  If someone can find a reliable source for this, please add it back to the article.  --Hirsutism (talk) 14:35, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Strength depends on the direction of the force as well. An advantage of scarf joints (mitre joints in two butted pieces) is that they convert a simple tension across the joint into a shear force. The joint area is also larger than that of a butt. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:50, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  What we really need is a reliable source saying this.  It's good to see input from someone with a mechanical engineering background, but ultimately we need a  reliable source to back it up.  --Hirsutism (talk) 16:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are miter welds stronger or weaker than butt welds? 

message: So why is it called a miter joint? Because it's angled, like a miter (or mitre)? Maikel (talk) 13:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup. See wikt:mitre.   ◅ Sebastian 05:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: What's there name for a miter joint between parts of different width? Our German article dedicates it a whole section. ◅ Sebastian 05:39, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skewed miter
Talk:Rabbet

message: Perhaps someone with a better understanding of the subject than myself could explain what the difference between a rabbet and a dado is? Thanks. cbustapeck 05:56, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You could do no better than to read the articles here on dado (joinery) and rabbet, complete with pictures by yours truly! SilentC 06:19, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Incase it eludes you, the chief difference is that a rebate (or what you call a rabbet) is cut into the edge of a board, so that it only has two sides, whereas a dado is cut in the 'field' of the board, so that it has three sides. A dado is further differentiated from a groove, in that it runs perpendicular to the grain, whereas the latter runs parallel to it. SilentC 06:21, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have a curious inquiry about one of the methods listed, handsaw and chisel. It may be my screwed up way of doing rabbets, but I don't use a chisel at all. I saw down to the depth I need on the face, and then saw inward from the side. No chiseling is required.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.249.193.157 (talk) 06:16, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Methods?

message: According to the references, 'rabbet' is used in North American English; in some unspecified other place, 'rabbet' is archaic and replaced with 'rebate'.
The first sentence's parenthetical "(rebate in Standard English)" is quite unclear.  "Standard English" is a blanket term for any dialect of English that an English-speaking country recognizes as normal.  Said another way, 'Rabbet' is correct in the Standard English of the United States, and it's unclear which Standard English recommends 'rebate.'
If the intended interpretation is that 'rebate' is used in, for instance, the U.K., then it should say 'rebate in U.K. English'.  If the intention is to say that 'rebate' is used everywhere except USA and Canada, then it should probably say that.  Wherever it's used, this use of 'Standard English' is wholly ambiguous.
Thanks, 140.180.189.9 (talk) 19:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rabbet vs Rebate: What is 'standard english?' 

message: Umm...I don't think you can write "it's like a butt joint, but has more advantages" without, you know, citing any...wait for it...advantages! In my opinion, the biggest advantage is the increased surface area for glue. You would also be locating in an additional plane. 
I wouldn't, but I guess you could argue it hides the end grain of the inserted panel, but you would also have to be strategic about the piece of wood you're putting the rabbet into. If we're talking about the side+back of a cabinet, you can easily hide the end grain of the back, but you would have to make sure the grain on the *sides* ran north/south or a "sliver" of end grain would still be showing, making everything for naught. You mind as well make the grain of the back panel run north/south and butt joint!
--2601:2C7:8300:784:9022:1457:A049:2D55 (talk) 03:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advantages?
Talk:Tongue and groove

message: The article is a bit lop-sided -- it doesn't even give an idea that the term "Tongue and groove" is also used in radiotherapy (and who knows where else) and means underdosage effect in the area where fields of two leaves of multileaf collimator overlap. I understand that it's a special topic, but I'd say that it shoud at least be mentioned. Thanks.
195.131.175.121 22:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled radiotherapy

message: Tongue and groove is completely, totally, utterly and wholy irrelevent to the articles linked to Groove (engineering). Peter Horn 01:49, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groove (engineering)