lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Line 6 (company)

message: The reference (number 7 btw) looks dead, and there is no other supporting information for this claim.  I will kill soon if no discussion occurs. 208.168.238.169 (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: EVH plays Line 6 stuff? 

message: The article resembles a brochure, featuring, as it does, an apparently exhaustive list of company products. I do not believe this is acceptable, especially since the article does not cite a single secondary source. I will trim the section, and editors can reinsert elements if they have some sort of validation from reliable secondary sources. Drmies (talk) 21:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Sales brochure

message: The list of product history misses important Produkts, like AxSys or Ax2. Also it should read chronologically, not reversed. KhlavKhalash (talk) 17:05, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Product history
Talk:Slapton, Buckinghamshire

message: The word buffalo in this article links to a disambig.  Anyone know wht type of buffalo is farmed here, so the disambig can be fixed?  Tx.--Esprit15d 19:14, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

message: I have tagged the section of the article which refers to sightings of ghosts within cottages in the village. Such material needs to be verifiable and I was unable to find a suitable historic record of this being a significant feature relating to the village. Such content needs to meet the reguriements of WP:Verifibility. Furthermore regardless of the veracity of the content there is excessive amount of detail on what can only be considered as trivial. Propose the section should be removed unless some notorius pattern of events can be shown to have impacted on the village over a historic period for which reliable sources can be found making a proportionate mention appropriate. Tmol42 (talk) 20:43, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost story 
Talk:Zane Grey

message: I have edited the Works section to provide a structure for adding links to multiple sources where Zane Grey's public domain works can be directly and easily obtained by Wikipedia readers.  In the process I added just a few such links, to the Internet Archive, Project Gutenberg, and Librivox.org.  This applies both to his books, and to films made from them.  I hope that other editors will help to populate links to a much larger number of Grey's works, and to other formats and suppliers of freely available online access.  Thank you!  Gnuish (talk) 05:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to readable/listenable/watchable works of Zane Grey
Talk:Iberian pre-Romanesque art and architecture

message: I don't understand this article. How can you have "Spanish art" before Spain existed? That's like calling the art of the Celts in present-day England "English Art". It makes no sense. We call it Celtic art and Anglo-Saxon art and Hiberno-Saxon art. The same with Spain, we break it down into the entities that existed at the time, we dont call it "Spanish art".  Stbalbach 19:30, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Spain did exist then.  The English-language term "Spain" may not have because the modern English language didn't, but Spain existed.  The Latin term "Hispania" certainly did.  That is the term which evolved into Spain in English and the name for Spain in most other languages and all Romance ones.  Spain meant Iberia, or Christian Iberia, depending on the time.  The term "Anglo-Saxon art" means about as much as "English art", but of a specific period.  "Spanish Pre-Romanesque" refers to art of Spain in the Pre-Romanesque art period.  Regional differences were more significant in a bygone era when communication and travel were slower, thus Spanish pre-romanesque is differentiated from other varieties such as Carolingian or Ottonian art.  Celtic, Anglo-Saxon, and Hiberno-Saxon art are not Pre-Romanesque, they are Migration Period art.  Srnec 04:03, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Absolute Power (novel)

message: This is an EXTREMELY subjective description of the book, with very little actually descriptive detail other than the article author's opinion.  This article should be either completely revised or deleted altogether.
     I agree completely, as this reads more like a review of the book rather than an objective summary.
Isn't the book called Executive power, anyway? 198.45.18.28 18:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The title is actually "Absolute Power" (in the UK anyway)  for my paperback version. Basiclife (talk) 13:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is called Absolute Power (in the US), it is currently sitting on my shelf.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.182.32.227 (talk) 12:41, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Subjective
Talk:Naruto: Uzumaki Chronicles

message: Erm, this game isn't multiplayer is it? I'm pretty sure it's not. Also, why is the stub RPG? It's not a RPG. --Zeno McDohl 19:32, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Bandai lists the game as action-adventure, but I think it would be better suited as an RPG. The character develops and must perform quests, but I am not sure where the line it drawn there. Seems more along the lines of Final Fantasy type since you have a party of characters at times, rather than a Laura Croft type game. Someone may have confused the "Partner-assist" as meaning a second controller could be used rather than switching between characters. I also added the link to BandaiGames as a reference of the hopeful/speculated release date. shadzar|Talk|contribs 05:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RPG vs ACtion. 

message: The article doesn't mention anything on the storyline and doesn't even provide screenshots. It only talks about the voice acting and the changes made in the edited version. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 09bmarcu (talk • contribs) 02:23, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game Information
Template talk:Infobox French commune

message: Is it worth us editing the template to include a parameter below the Crest and Flag for the logo of a commune as many article have in French and are seen in English articles for cities across North America (i.e. Vancouver? Question to the editors, don't want to change anything without discussion. Epluribusunumyall (talk) 07:45, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's a nice option, to add a logo image. Could you make a test version in the sandbox? Markussep Talk 19:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing template to include a parameter for the Municipalities logo

message: With the French loving their flag and proudly brandishing it when they can even on food packaging, I believe it's appropriate to use the template  for the Country, as it would reflect this ;) Synotia (talk) 11:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, the use of flags in infoboxes is generally deprecated, see MOS:INFOBOXFLAG. The same guideline also says: , which would apply here. For some countries it is done, for many it isn't. Personally I wouldn't prefer it. Markussep Talk 09:34, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a useful shortcut for the brain. In some Wikipedias like French, Spanish Wikipedia it is used even in biographies. I personally find that less important there, but for geographical, political, military stuff it is. Synotia (talk) 09:47, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

text: I (respectfully) detest that deprecation; flags aren't distracting, they're a visual aid that make text more pleasant to read. I'd strongly support changing to , and I'll note that even that MOS doesn't discourage it. DFlhb (talk) 21:49, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag
Talk:The Hurricane and Rosey

message: Should't this article be names "Rosey and The Hurricane"? That is how they were always referred to. TJ Spyke 02:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor

message: Although no one can ever be certain, elements of Rudolf II behaviour and personality are 
consistent with Asperger's Syndrome, a form of high IQ autism. Diamond Dave (8 November, 2005)
So he's like rainman. ROFL!
-Alex, 12.220.157.93 09:27, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled comments 

message: Anyone know why Rudolf II gets a "II" as his ordinal? He is the first Holy Roman Emperor and first ruler of Germany of that name. --Jfruh 16:25, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Rudolf I was only king not emperor  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.89.242.173 (talk) 07:50, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Rudolf I?
Talk:Fermat polygonal number theorem

message: I don't like the phrasing of this theorem: "Every positive integer is a sum of at most n n-polygonal numbers".  Clearly 4 = 1 + 1 + 1 + 1 is a counterexample by that 1 is a 3-gonal number.  It should be more like "Expressing any positive integer as a sum requires at most n n-gonal numbers."
:Yup, fixed.  RobHar (talk) 04:17, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sketchy statement
Talk:Monolithic

message: Most programs use static linking, even if they also use dynamic linking (though this is not necessarily a requirement). As an example, many programs use the C runtime as a static link library (though this can be dynamically linked, e.g. MSVCRTxx.DLL). So it would not be appropriate to use "Monolithic" and "Statically linked" as synonyms. 66.71.68.210 20:02, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

message: The current redirection to a type of crystal is not the correct place for most of the things that link to "monolithic" to go to.  I think the right redirection would be to Monolith (disambiguation).  That will create a lot of links that will have to be repointed to the correct destinations, but it seems like the right place for someone who types in "Monolithic" as a search term. Dpv 04:05, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Monolith (disambiguation)?
Talk:William Cavendish, 7th Duke of Devonshire

message: Hi
I think there is a mistakte with the ancestors. His father was NOT William Cavendish, 6th Duke of Devonshire but William_Cavendish_(1783-1812). It took my half an hour to find where this mistake is because it was very confusing...
sorry for my bad english. I would be glad to see that anybody who understands more from Wikipedia would correct it. 
thanks 
Atlantica0705 (talk) 21:16, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: At s:Founder's Day in War Time#27 it states that the Duke was first President of the extended Owens College and first Vice-Chancellor of the Victoria University. I am almost— billinghurst sDrewth 08:25, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  first President of the extended Owens College and first Vice-Chancellor of the Victoria University
Talk:Malay Peninsula

message: Strongly disagree - the two article Peninsular Malaysia and Southern Thailand cover two parts of the Malay Peninsular, while this article covers what is common for the two regions (and also the small part of Myanmar which also belongs to the peninsula). There is of course some overlap, which then should be put into the common article, but nevertheless all three articles have enough non-common contents to be valid articles on their own. andy 20:17, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: True. Merge removed.--Ezeu 21:15, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Peninsular Malaysia

message: what is the total land area in both miles iand KM?
dont forget that singapore even though its a island is geograpically part of the peninsula land areas also includ islands near to the land mass.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.253.134.27 (talk) 05:31, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  how much land area? 

message: The long list of languages seems counterproductive for an infobox, but I wouldn't know how to shorten it. A collapse seems a bad idea. Maybe remove it entirely? Remsense诉 04:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There probably doesn't have to be four Malay names listed DervotNum4 (talk) 05:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: After looking at other pages using the "native name" slot, I now think it should just be removed, far too big an area for it DervotNum4 (talk) 23:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

text: I'd support removal as well. Local names aren't needed for large geographical features, or we'd end up with hundreds for each of the continents. --Paul_012 (talk) 09:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: All the languages listed seem to have articles, so the information remains accessible even if not in the infobox. CMD (talk) 09:40, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Metro systems by number of stations

message: Munich U-Bahn — 91 station. Does number 229 also include suburban trains stations?--Sascha. 14:19, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And the actual figure for Berlin (U-Bahn only) is 170 stations, according to its article. I will change the figures when I work out what are the real ten biggest systems. - ҉ Randwicked ҉ 03:09, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So Berlin will be at number 9 with 170. I can't find any others bigger than the Chicago 'L' with 144 stations, so that must be number 10. - ҉ Randwicked ҉ 06:31, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Munich 

message: The numbers for Tokyo only include Tokyo Metro and Toei, the two subway companies in Tokyo.  If anyone knows about Tokyo, Tokyo has an extensive network of rapid trainsit outside of the subway companies, for example the Tokyo Monorail, is not included in the list of stations.  The Tokyo Monorail handles 300,000 passengers a day, with over 500 cars, by every definition it should be included in the numbers here.  The Rinkai Line in Tokyo is an underground rapid transit that runs mainly underground in Tokyo, again its numbers are not included.  The Tama Monorail, and many other private rapid transit systems that run in Tokyo are not included in the numbers here.  Not to mention lines such as the Yamanote Line which by all definitions is a rapid trainsit line that operates wholly within Tokyo.  I think the problem arises because Tokyo is a very unquie city with its transportation network, you have, private rail, and public-private rail, and public rail operators. Limitedexpresstrain 19:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tokyo 

message: How do we count stations? It seems that stations are counted in different ways in different cities. Take a look at the World Metro List. It has two columns for number of stations. One that counts interchange stations as multiple stations, and the other that counts interchange stations as one station. I would prefer the latter. --Kildor (talk) 16:57, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Me too. So Prague Metro has only 51 stations instead of 54. Nazgul02 (talk) 13:28, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to count stations 

message: As the ever expanding Incheon Subway is integrated with that of Seoul, should those stations be counted here? Also, what of the light right that is being built now? DaronDierkes (talk) 02:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seoul 

message: In Moscow Metro, the term light metro is used incorrectly for BLLM, unless it sounds good. The only differences of this line from the others are the number of vagons, the length of platforms and mostly estacade construction. Still it is the part of Moscow Metro, it's not separated from it. The rolling stock, service, management etc are common, as it's considered to be one of the lines of MM. // vh16ru talk 17:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moscow: about light metro
Talk:Dmitry Shuisky

message: This article was branched off by me today from the Battle of Klushino. In that article, they say that it was the Poles who gained a striking victory, no mention whatever of their allies being made. But in this article, when the obvious mention of Polish agressors is made in relation to that battle, the Polish editors start to cry murder and strike it out on account that other people were featured in the Polish army as well. We notice a curious tendency: when a victory is mentioned the Polish-Lithuanian army is said to consist of the Poles only (as in Battle of Klushino), but when a massacre, agression, or defeat is mentioned they say that the Poles were only a small part of the army (as here}. Is it called NPOV in Poland? --Ghirlandajo 20:30, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Accidentally, that's what stops me and KNewman from contributing new articles on subjects where even a passing mention of Poland or Ukraine is made. Such an article, within minutes from its creation, is to be assaulted by scores of Polish and Ukrainian revert maniacs who haven't started a single valuable article tehmselves but find their sole pleasure and occupation in the Wikipedia in turning the others' articles into a bunch of shit. --Ghirlandajo 20:30, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Can somebody explain the rationale behind the recent edit wars. Are there any doubt that Shuia was the patronimy of Shuiskyes? Or that the Polish army was the invaders? Or that Shuiskies were Rurikids? abakharev 23:48, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit war?
Talk:Scan

message: The term 'scan' can be used to refer to a scanned image of DVD cover art, a magazine illustration, a poster and more and is a commonly used term in many online (and possibly offline) anime and manga communities. For example, "I have made a wallpaper out of this scan of the character Chii from Chobits".
This is pertinent because I have updated the minitokyo article and have used scan in this sense repeatedly. Should this definition of scan (suitably written up) be included in this page or is not different enough to warrant that?
Update: I've added the definition to the list. Story Weaver 11:41, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anime/Manga Scans 

message: Link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prefix_sum  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poleris (talk • contribs) 04:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion 

message: I reorganized the sections into Electronics or Computer Related, Organizations, and Other for both Scan & Scanning. I think someone who is up to is should combine scan and scanning, since they are so closely related. To me it does not make a lot of sense to have them separate. I'll eventually get around to it.   Jonverve (talk) 21:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-organize
Talk:List of P. G. Wodehouse characters

message: In line with the proposal made here (and in various other places), I'm planning to merge all the existing articles on minor characters into one article, P. G. Wodehouse minor characters. I've looked at the style of this Minor Discworld characters list, and made a start on the Ukridge characters. I'd repoint any links from this main list to the appropriate entry, and fill in as many as I could manage. From what I hear though, redirects only work to the top of a page and can't be pointed to a section, so the existing articles would have to either point to the top of the list or be deleted...
My main problem is deciding who counts as a major character, and thus deserves their own page (these will also be linked in from the new page). Should this be based on how much is already written about them, how many appearances they make, or some other grounds? 
My thoughts so far would be:
* Jeeves, Bertie, Aunt Dahlia, Aunt Agatha
* Bingo Little, Roderick Glossop
* Lord Emsworth; Gally? Rupert Baxter? Uncle Fred?
* Psmith; Mike?
* Ukridge
* Mr Mulliner, The Oldest Member??
Anyone else would be a minor char. and merged in. No idea on timescales here, welcome any suggestions, ideas, offers of help, abuse etc...  JohnnyZen 17:27, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What, no Lady Constance?  —Tamfang 18:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yay she could be a candidate; would probably be good to have as many majors as are worth doing - having only done the Ukridge books, the page clearly going to be pretty big. Another idea (half suggested here) would be to have separate pages for minor Jeeves characters and minor Blandings characters, with the overlaps either inter-linked or, where possible, kept as majors (may be doable with Roderick Glossop, Daphne Winkworth; maybe Lord Tilbury too (not in Jeeves I don't think but in a few Blandings as well as several others)). There's also the questino of how minor a character has to be to be excluded from the page (but maybe left on this list). On a different note, I've been working on a list of places (combining some of the other stubby entries) - you can check it out here, and please feel free to leave any comments or suggestions on the associated talk page JohnnyZen 12:05, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor characters page 
Talk:Duke of Berwick

message: This is good stuff. I think we should add it here and in House of Alba. --euyyn 09:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should this dukedom be classified as a Jacobite peerage? It was created in 1687, when James II was undisputedly King of England. On the other hand, it was used in Jacobite circles after it was forfeited in 1695 by the de facto regime in London, so maybe this is the best place for it - after that time, it was for practical purposes indistinguishable from creations after James ceased to be de facto monarch.Alekksandr (talk) 14:20, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Jacobite Peerage?
Talk:Michael Aspel

message: Wasn't he born in Battersea, London?
2007 hosted "Have I got news for You" and gave the bird.......  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.201.104.21 (talk) 21:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who by? Who says so?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.243.189 (talk) 17:16, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Often mistaken for Michael Parkinson'

message: I'm revising the article in response to the clean up tags. I'm happy to discuss changes if needed. -- — Keithbob • Talk •  17:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm done and have removed the copy edit tags. However, more sources are needed.-- — Keithbob • Talk •  01:07, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions

message: It's fairly normal in a bio of this sort to make at least some passing reference to the parents (their names, occupations, etc). We can see from the endnotes/footnotes he didn't like his father but even that doesn't make it in to the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.176.153 (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parents…? 
Talk:1950s in comics

message: "Police Badge #749" #5 (1955) - wasn't sure if "#749" was or wasn't part of title, so kept it in with 'nowiki' tags around it so the # won't be interpreted as part of the link by Wikipedia. -- DMS 20:53, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just relinked it, as the   was visible. It's red link anyway, so I'll Google it and see if I can find out if the hash is needed or not. Digifiend (talk) 13:01, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Top of the list: http://www.comics-db.com/comic-book/1061612-Police_Badge_5.html - yep, the hash was supposed to be there. Digifiend (talk) 13:03, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

message: No mention of British comics, maybe this article should be called 1950s in American comics? Digifiend (talk) 13:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  US bias 

message: Why not rename this 1950s in Marvel Comics?  This is just a glofied checklist of everything Marvel published.  Where's the DC, Dell, Charlton, and all the other publishers?
Mtminchi08 (talk) 08:58, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marvel Comics bias
Talk:Class action

message: That was a poor choice to remove the clarification that the term "class action lawsuit" is pleonastic. One of the very first things everyone learns when they go to law school is the fundamental difference between an action at law and a suit in equity and how they continue to haunt the common law from their graves.  The term "lawsuit" is already redundant so the term "class action lawsuit" is doubly redundant.  --Coolcaesar (talk) 19:46, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, to follow up on this point: I've noticed that class action specialists are very careful in oral and written communications to not say "class action lawsuit", presumably because the difference between "action" and "suit" is pounded into them either in law school or at their first class action job.  It's only laypersons and lawyers from other fields unfamiliar with complex litigation who use that phrase. --Coolcaesar (talk) 12:34, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another issue with User:Agtx's edits