Talk:Can't Stop (Red Hot Chili Peppers song)

message: This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of May 22, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: This is the biggest area of failure.  Rock should be lowercase in the lead paragraph.  There should be a comma after "2002 album."  This sentence:  has grammar issues. First, a semi-colon separates to distinct (though related) sentences.  The second half is not a sentence.  Also, entailed is used incorrectly in that sentence, and doesn't really make any sense.  There also needs to be a comma after the word short. In this sentence: Can't Stop is unique, there needs to be quotes around "Can't Stop." "7th" needs to be spelled out. "four-some" is one word (foursome).  This sentence:  should actually read: "Activities in the video include (but are not limited to): The part that says "white letters, reading:" should say "white letters read,"  Also "Aspects on the lighting were" should read "The lighting was" In the heading "Greatest Hits Controversy" only the first word should be capitalized, and the same goes for "Composition and Lyrical Denotation."  "fan-favorite song" should read "favorite songs" Overall this article needs a thorough copyediting for punctuation, correct word usage, and grammar.
:2. Factually accurate?: Some effort has been put into citing references, and that is commendable.  However, more work remains.  This sentence  needs to have a citation proving that this is true.  Or it needs to be removed.  Also, pretty much all the claims in the subheading "Greatest hits controversy" are unverified, and sometimes speculative (for example "which leads one to believe"). 
:3. Broad in coverage?: Not bad here.
:4. Neutral point of view?: There are a few neutrality issues in this article.  This sentence:  is biased (not NPOV) and the citation behind the statement only proves that one fan liked it (the man with the beard).
:5. Article stability? Great - no edit wars, just dedicated edits by editors.
:6. Images?: The images are all good, with fair use rationales and source info. However, the placement leaves gaps of white in the article.  I recommend moving one of them around some.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration.  If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review.  Thank you for your work so far. 
— Esprit15d (talk ¤ contribs) 14:08, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: * Thanks for the review - your comments are very fair & helpful :) I'll go through and copyedit it now. Kamryn Matika 15:26, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination

message: :Image:Can't Stop.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Can't Stop.JPG

message: :Image:Frusciante can'tstoplights.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Frusciante can'tstoplights.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Can't Stop (Red Hot Chili Peppers song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926221312/http://www.musicsquare.net/charts/song/59 to http://www.musicsquare.net/charts/song/59
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:53, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)