lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sugarloaf Mountain (Maryland)

message: The article says it's located in Dickerson, which, according to its own Wikipedia article, is in Montgomery County. But the infobox says Frederick County. So which is it? VJ (talk) 19:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dickerson is in Montgomery County & the mtn is in Frederick County. Obviously the mtn is not "in" the town, just near it. 140.139.35.250 (talk) 19:17, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frederick or Montgomery or both? 

message: When I read the article, I was surprised that neither of the 2 houses that are on the mountain are mentioned. The first (Strong Mansion) is basically a large, gray, square-shaped house. The second (whose name I forget), looks like a normal family home. Will these be included in future revisions? 208.57.91.179 (talk) 23:49, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why aren't the houses mentioned in the article?  

message: In the info box, I changed the "easiest route" line to mention the trail and stairway. (It previously said "Drive" but you can't drive all the way to the top. 76.111.17.151 (talk) 15:49, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climbing 

message: The official website is , the link the article current claims to be the official website is a state trails page. It should be changed - you have to do three clicks currently from WP to the incorrect "official site", to the official site - just to see what the hours are.
BadZen (talk) 15:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Website
Talk:Sixth sense

message: I removed the following entries because they had no incoming links and were redlinked, i.e. they seemed nonnotable.
* Sixth Sense Productions, a Hollywood production company which produced Hotel Rwanda
* Sixth Sense Investigations, a computer game for the Commodore Amiga
* The Sixth Sense (newspaper), a newspaper specially printed in Germany for British Forces personnel.  It has a readership of over 20,000 people.
– sgeureka t•c 12:33, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Has-a

message: this page should be nuked and merged into an orm topic. EvanCarroll 05:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Has-a seems to be a better name than Hasa (computer science) for the title, see also an analogous situation regarding Talk:Is-a. --Chris Howard (talk) 14:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Where are the good examples?  The ones given for OOP are both said to be incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.88.64.142 (talk) 15:29, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Good examples

message: This article has been around since 2003, has no references, has been tagged as such since 2009 even though having 41 editors, making it a candidate for an article for deletion review. Otr500 (talk) 02:49, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No source or references 

message: If a user were to read only the first bit of the article, they may take the given image as a good example and base their knowledge on this. It should be more explicitly stated that the examples given are fallacious and good examples should be offered in addition to the bad ones. Preferably before the bad examples appear.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.211.41.195 (talk) 16:18, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading 

message: The critique was deleted only because it was misplaced.  I am not saying that the deleted comments were wrong, just that they should have been put somewhere else -- whether the deleted critique of the diagram is valid or not is immaterial to this discussion.  
The diagram is either relevant to the article of “has-a” or it is not. Discussion of that relevancy belongs here in the Talk for this article, not in the article itself.  But, yes, if the diagram is a bad example of composition/aggregation, then that diagram would not belong in the article, but only because it would not belong anywhere (except in a discussion of bad UML models).  
Does the diagram show a good example/counter-example of “has-a”?  If it does not, then the diagram should be replaced with one that does, not criticized in the article.
Discussion of whether the diagram is a misuse of composition/aggregation belongs neither in this article nor in this Talk.  If the diagram is indeed misuse of composition/aggregation, then it is misuse of composition/aggregation in every article that links it.  So, the discussion of whether the diagram is indeed such misuse should be in the Talk for that diagram. Go for it. IveGoneAway (talk) 14:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of critique of the class diagram 

message: This article uses unnecessarily complex language, making it inaccessible to knowledge seekers. Chrisxfire (talk) 12:42, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecessarily complex
Talk:The Heartbreak Kid (2007 film)

message: I have yet to see this film but iMDB does list him in the cast...is there any confirmation either way if he is in this film or not? --Mikecraig 21:54, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: SHAWN MICHAELS IS NOT IN THIS MOVIE ...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.129.220.188 (talk) 00:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its true I've seen the movie twice, and not once did Shawn Michaels make an obvious apperance in the film, perhaps in a deleted scene maybe Masterofdestiny (talk) 01:14, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Read the article. The Shawn Micheals in the film is another Shawn Micheals. -62.219.97.215 (talk) 00:33, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: HBK/Shawn Michaels

message: in the plot text, it refers to all three of these names for the same character, which is Ben Stiller's..
"In the scene that follows, Lila and Eddy have sex so violently it actually causes Jimmie physical pain."
Or am I just mixed up? Fix it? 70.56.97.31 (talk) 05:47, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jimmie or Eddie/Eddy?
Talk:H. Verlan Andersen

message: I would like to add the following link to the external resources part of this page.  It has several relevant quotes from Anderson.  I have to get consensus before I add it, or it will be considered spam; so if anyone is familiar with H. Verlan Anderson, please comment up or down in this talk page. Link. Thank you. -Micahburnett 05:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External link
Talk:WJXL (AM)

message: I created this page and despite my screen name I am not affiliated with the station. I have edited many things on wikipedia but this the first thing I have created, which is why I used the name. Please do not delete it, as I am interviewing the president of the station for information. 1010xl 05:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You should avoid original research, and/or find web sites that verify your information. Bearian 02:35, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kettering, Tasmania

message: I don't think the acoustic panelling in the hall are really noteworthy in an encyclopaedic sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.77.130.144 (talk) 13:00, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sounds like a brochure
Talk:Hollywood Reservoir

message: You know something is going to crack that dam (Mulholland) soon; I can feel it;  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.225.124.158 (talk) 14:25, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  You Know Something Going to Give 
Talk:Corypha taliera

message: 3 Talipalm trees were planted in the premises of Notre Dame College, Dhaka in 2010. I think this should be mentioned in the article. Ifteebd10 (talk) 20:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talipalm trees in Notre Dame College campus
Portal talk:Devon

message: Could something  please be done about  the portal page? Dark blue on black is unreadable on mosyt  browsers. Thnks.--Kudpung (talk) 21:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you point to where there is dark blue on black? I can't find any. Jolly Ω Janner 15:00, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

text: It's completely unreadable on my browser - Google Chrome (which has 10% of internet users worldwide and rising) - and I didn't even realise there was text there until I came here to see why the page consisted of randomly spaced white words! (Doh - that was quite stupid I know.) Anyway, on Chrome at least it looks really awful and is completely unreadable DannyHuttonFerris (talk) 01:41, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: WikiProject Portals is back!
The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018. Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, support the ongoing improvement of portals and the editors dedicated to this, and design the portals of the future.
As of May 2nd, 2018, membership is at 60 editors, and growing. You are welcome to join us.
There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for improving each component of portals.  So far, 2 new dynamic components have been developed: Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.
Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.
And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.
From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject. Hope to see you there. Sincerely,      — The Transhumanist    07:27, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice from the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals|Portals WikiProject]]
Talk:Adansonia grandidieri

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Adansonia grandidieri04.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 30, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-06-30. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng  {chat} 17:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Adansonia grandidieri04.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Carbine (horse)

message: Just for those who care, I toned down the article a bit.  The horse was obviously significant, but I found no evidence that he could outrace a speeding bullet or clear skyscrapers in a single bound. (grin).  Basically, I chopped a lot of over-wikilinking (usually a term is wikilinked once per article at this length), tossed a lot of unneeded adjectives and other tweaks per WP:MOS, and generally tried to make it sound a bit more like an encyclopedia article and not the home page for the fan club.  Montanabw(talk) 05:39, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you mean that Carbine would not have been famous in Australia, if he had not raced there. He would have been still famous in New Zealand. Most racehorses from New Zealand go to Australia, as the prizemoney is much bigger there. If there was no big prizes in Australia, they would have gone somewhere else. On your other points, it is always good to get away from the hype. Unfortunately, this is rather difficult, as people are citing references (mainly from Australia) which also use hype. Unfortunately, New Zealand newspapers are also starting to do this as well.  Wallie (talk) 08:02, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of article

message: My understanding of the "Country section" in the info box refers to the country where the horse was foaled. Is this correct? In Carbine's case this should be New Zealand and not Australia and New Zealand. And can we get rid of these superfluous flag icons in accordance with the policy  WP:ICONDECORATION. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 00:35, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. It does refer to the place the horse was foaled. I am inclined to agree with you about the flag icons too. The whole nationalism thing should be toned down. Wallie (talk) 07:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Montanabw(talk) 23:46, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Info box and flag icons

message: I think we should remove these. Spearmint was a son of Carbine, and he is linked to Nearco, Nasrullah, Northern Dancer etc, whose bloodlines are in many many well known horses. The exercise in establishing lineage to Carbine is a bit pointless. Wallie (talk) 17:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, the lead does not need these additions. 22:44, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Links to Carbine in breeding

message: I think this sentence should be rewritten: "Statistics and contemporary assessments indicate that he was a dominant Antipodean racehorse of the 19th century, and he still ranks with such 20th-century Thoroughbreds as such as his descendants Nearco, Northern Dancer, Secretariat, Seattle Slew, Ballymoss, Shergar, Arkle, Never Say Die, Mr. Prospector, Nasrullah, Nijinsky II (winner of the UK Triple Crown), Royal Palace, Better Loosen Up, Sir Ivor, Phar Lap, Tulloch, Kingston Town[10] and Bernborough in terms of renown among turf historians." The part "as such as his descendants..." doesn't make sense to me. VirtualDave 13:43, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unclear sentence
Talk:Khitrovo Gospels

message: See Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_11 and scroll down to the boxed-up entry for the European Library. The Khitrovo Gospel is not the nucleus of an article on a notable topic that can be expanded in a meaningful way by regular editors. It is possible that a side-mention of the Khitrovo Gospel might belong in one of our existing articles on Russian history. An entire article need not exist just to provide a repository for a single link to the European Library. EdJohnston 05:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The UNESCO Memory of the World Register states that "The manuscript has a great significance in the human written history of universal philosophy and culture.". I added the link and I will remove the deletion tag. Stammer 12:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the prod as inappropriate. I commented vigourously at the time against the EL setting-up these un-wiki stubs, & reworked it a bit myself I think. It is now no worse than many Illuminated MS stubs, & the book is unquestionably notable.  To say: "The Khitrovo Gospel is not the nucleus of an article on a notable topic that can be expanded in a meaningful way by regular editors" is just plain wrong. It should have an IM stub tag, btw. Johnbod 13:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More elegant form of link spam

message: A very welcome expansion & pic, but what are the contents? Is it just one Gospel, or should it be renamed to Khitrovo Gospels?  Johnbod 15:33, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: read more carefully & moved. I renamed the redlink one on the assumption it has the set too. Johnbod 15:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gospels 
Talk:Poplar River First Nation

message: ;To the Wikipedia Moderators
Poplar River First Nation belongs to Southeast Resource Development Council. Southeast Resource Development Council owns and operates a First Nation casino called South Beach Casino. This means the people from Poplar River First Nation own the casino. Creating a link to the casino is not spam because they own it. Linking to a business that is owned by Poplar River First Nation is not spam. The monies collected are not used to make one individual rich, but is used towards helping the communities governed by Southeast Resource Development Council.Unsigned comment by 75.153.91.205 (Talk) on 18 November 2008, 05:32
:The South Beach Casino website link at the Poplar River First Nation would be considered Spam. However, when someone generates an article for the Southeast Resource Development Council and more specifically their Southeast Community Futures Development Corporation activities, then in that article, though it may be a hard sell to some, we should be able to place a link to the South Beach Casino website from there. Feel like starting that article? CJLippert (talk) 15:10, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're missing the point. The casino/resort link and even a description belongs on a different article, but that different article don't yet exist. You can either take initiative and start an article on Southeast Resource Development Council and place the casino/resort description and link there, or you could write an article on the Brokenhead Ojibway Nation and place the link there, or you can wait until someone decides to write on either of those two needed articles, and then add the link after one or both articles have been written. CJLippert (talk) 15:33, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Casino

message: There are a number of flat out falsehoods in the health section (for example, the bit about metabolism of aboriginal people, and the bit about low employment in “all” First Nations communities). The section should be heavily edited or removed entirely if no citations are provided. 2605:B100:E050:6880:F959:92D2:7BF9:75E3 (talk) 23:58, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health section
Talk:Tonga Rugby Union

message: This article has been classified as a stub due to its length. I have classified it as high as it is a Tier Two nation. Capitalistroadster 05:33, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification
Talk:Toyota GTV

message: The Chrysler Turbine that I'm thinking of had a diagram that looked practically identical to a picture of the GTV's engine.Stepho-wrs 05:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chrsyler Turbine

message: Which issue? Stepho-wrs 05:40, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Car Magazine
Talk:Heroes of Shipka

message: Hello, I wanted to discuss the main image. The main article image is currently of a DVD cover, and in my opinion does not properly represent the film.
The caption is also inaccurate (Geroite na Shipka – Original Bulgarian poster) – the image is of a DVD cover; not of a poster.
I have uploaded the official, original Bulgarian poster on the 2nd of October, but my edit was reverted. The image was fair-use; width 300px.
Please share your opinions regarding the image.
Er nesto (talk) 22:57, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Image
Talk:Barrie Rutter

message: I have done some cleanup. I don't see how the theatre programme is an independent source as it is jointly published by Rutter's own company. I have removed unsourced colour. Also, much of the other content is unsourced. In a biography it is especially important that all material is reliably sourced and encyclopaedic -  see WP:BLP. Just Chilling (talk) 18:31, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources and tone
Talk:Lighthouse Tower

message: "reduce its overall energy consumption by 65%, and its water consumption by 40%."? Compared to what?  TREKphiler 13:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it refers to the average energy and water consumption of a similarly sized building.  Or it could be in relation to the same building, but without any turbines or other energy-saving methods.  But, I really have no clue as this does not describe, as you say, what the reduction is being compared to.  Leitmanp (talk | contributions) 21:10, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: By the numbers
Talk:EnergyAustralia

message: Refer to Talk:EnergyAustralia#Merge proposal --(Pdfpdf (talk) 08:45, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: This page reads like it was written by their marketing department. Dreadful! —☸ Moilleadóir ☎ 06:35, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put some cites in and explained the current controversy surrounding the company. --Almaty🦢✉✎ 11:41, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 

message: Brisbane Waters, Newcastle, The shire, Sydney CBD were separate entitities providing employment and power to local residents. NSW state government decided that the various county Councils need to amalgamate and formed "Energy Australia" which provided face to face service.
Then the NSW Liberal Government "Michael Baird" kept the mandate to privatise the retail arm to make electricity prices cheaper in 2011.
Then the NSW government leased the poles and wires for 99years with a 51% stake to still get the NSW governments revenue.
So Energy Australia was not founded by the current owners "China Light and Power (CLP)" 121.218.20.4 (talk) 09:59, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Energy Australia was not founded it was an amalgation of various County Councils
Talk:XO Project

message: I was going to be writing this very article tonight, but someone beat me to it. There is a lot of references and information on this group, and I believe it is far from non-notable. I will be working on cleaning up this article myself. Turlo Lomon 06:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is definitely much better now than when I found it and tagged it. DarkAudit 06:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And even better now. Tag rescinded. Carry on and good luck. DarkAudit 07:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hang On

message: I'm trying to tidy up the Astronomy category by moving all but the most important articles to sub-categories, but I can't decide where to put this one.  Would you say it's an Astronomical survey? Cosmo0 17:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization

message: Is there a reason for having a separate XO Telescope article? Both are small despite some redundancy, and we have no indication that the telescope was notable for other purposes than the XO Project. Jim.henderson (talk) 14:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Support; short articles with virtually identical topics. SevenSpheres (talk) 23:43, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 11:27, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Lhokseumawe

message: Is the motto really "Kota Petro Dollar$"? I find it hard to believe, but I'm finding things on other websites that seems to confirm it. Not clear if they have just been copied from Wikipedia or not, though. Good Ol’factory (talk) 08:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Motto

message: Unfortunately, much of the paragraphs dealing with History in this article have clearly not been written by someone whose native language is English. Parts of the present text are unclear and contain mention of terms which are undefined or even indecipherable. It would be much appreciated if someone could rewrite this section and insert appropriate links. Rif Winfield (talk) 08:10, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Skidaway Institute of Oceanography

message: In addition to the Institute PR person you may wish to cite information from the following sources:
* New Georgia Encyclopedia
* GA Tech Catalog
* NAML fact page
I will add more as I find them<BR>
Absolon S. Kent 15:22, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Encyclopedia one is really good, thank you. The other two you can delete, as it's just a repeat of the brochure-like material that's already everywhere else. Nerwen 01:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Resources

message: * Upload logo image  -  Absolon S. Kent 19:25, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article "To Do" List

message: I got the distance to Gray's Reef off of the page for it, where it says 17.5 nautical miles. Whoever knows how to put in the proper conversion for that, please do.
Nerwen (talk) 21:05, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: converted to nautical miles and square nautical miles. Absolon S. Kent (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gray's Reef

message: So... when I wrote the history section of this article in 2007, about 90% of it was from three hardcopy-only books in the SkIO library. There really wasn't much point to citing each individual sentence, since the whole article is a composite narrative from all of them. I suppose someone who still lives near the SkIO library and has a lot of time on their hands, can take a crack at it. Nerwen (talk) 16:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  insufficient inline citations? 