Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/IZAK

message: <BR> I have moved this dispute to the list of disputes not yet certified.<BR>
When this began I informed the original complainant User:HistoryBuffEr that he did not have standing to certify the action<BR>
unless he made some attempt to come to terms with User:IZAK, and I even suggested approaches,<BR>
but he indicated he could not, or would not, deal with him, So he is not in a position to certify<BR>
and User:Ed Poor has not given evidence of his own attempts to reach IZAK.<BR>
The only users in a position to certify right now are User:pir, User:JFW and User:Jayjg.<BR>
The 48-hour clock has started again. If complainants really want to put this forward, surely you can find two people<BR>
who have engaged IZAK, been rebuffed, and are willing to certify. -- Cecropia | explains it all ® 18:23, 14 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice

message: From User:IZAK#Opposing Anti-Semitism on Wikipedia:
See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/IZAK
:Izak, from my own experience, I suggest you now take HistoryBuffEr straight to Arbitration, and demand he be banned from all articles concerning the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. You have a great and compelling body of evidence against him. GeneralPatton 19:36, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: User:GeneralPatton suggests that HistoryBuffer be taken to Arbitration

message: (from User talk:HistoryBuffEr/Archived-Sermons)
Historybuff... I'm just curious. What do you think of Jewish people in general? Rickyrab 19:20, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Attempt to find out whether HistoryBuffer is anti-Semitic or not

message: Dear All,
Please refrain from putting tags on people and remain logical, civilized and without passions taking over. Bile and jugulars have no precedence over the white and gray matter :O). Tags are neither nice, nor arguments. Instead of using so much time, energy and bandwidth to wait for people and stick it on their forhead, why don't you rest, smell flowers, walk in public gardens and admire automn in this beautiful northern hemisphere :O) As an experienced editor, medical doctor, victim of Securitate, libelled/arbitrated/rfc/banned/tagged/smeared colleague, please stop ! - irismeister 23:22, 2004 Oct 16 (UTC)
*Irismeister: You know, you do have a valid point. Your concern is appreciated - I really mean it. IZAK 08:13, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Against Tags on People. Tags are nothing, People are Everything !

message: The Wikipedia is much younger than the e-mail newsgroups which many people are familiar with. No one has really been able to prevent flame wars on Usenet or Dejanews. And even a subscribers-only mailing list can be hard to moderate. God knows I tried here at the English Wikipedia.
But we are not just posting e-mail messages. We are using a wiki to craft encyclopedia articles. This requires a mental and emotional shifting of gears. --user:Ed Poor (dope rouser) 14:34, Nov 3, 2004 (UTC)
:I am personally completely unfamiar with e-mail newsgroups. I am however familiar with message board forums, and these in my experience have immaculate civility, since rude comments are removed, and the user making them warned. If incivility continues, the offenders are banned. Its very simple. Eventually wikipedia will have such enlightened policies, until them some of us will suffer thru, others will leave. Thomas Jefferson for President 16:48, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hoorah! Thomas Jefferson for President 23:55, 3 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: A general observation