Talk:Jar Jar Binks

message: At the very end of the article, please expand the quote from "as to why it's obviously true" to "as to why it's obviously true why he's [evil]".  This is the complete quotation as given by citation #44, which is already there.  Because the current quotation lacks its conclusion, it sounds like Abrams considers the essay's length a reason for believing the essay's argumentation, but if you include the end of the quotation, you'll see that he's simply describing the argumentation. 175.39.61.121 (talk) 19:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: accepted - Matches source. The current version hardly makes sense to someone unfamiliar with the topic, thanks for your edit. Actualcpscm (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 November 2022 

message: I want to lead off with the fact that I want to act like an adult and follow Wikipedia guidelines. I understand that my edits may lack notability, as they describe content that isn't listed in the summary for the Robot Chicken: Star Wars Episode III article, and are mainly based off of this wiki article, this other wiki article, and this YouTube video, none of which are reliable. My edits are also not cited with verifiable sources, as I could find no reliable sources talking about Robot Chicken Episode III's Darth Jar Jar segment, although IGN did review it. I will be the first to admit that I do not own a copy of RCSWEIII, and therefore cannot confirm or deny, in the realm of original research at least, really any of the information that I put in the article. However, I do have a couple things on my side! First of all, all editors must assume that what I am doing is in good faith, which protects me somewhat from editors from reverting my edits. Second of all, I am partially covered by WP:JUSTDOIT and WP:IGNORE. That brings me to my motivations for making these edits. They are a combination of compulsion (I was reading the Jar Jar Binks article and was alarmed by the ommission of the Darth Jar Jar sketch), core mission (I want people to not be mislead that the Reddit user was the first person to come up with Darth Jar Jar), and responsibility/altruism (because I want to do my part). I hope that my edits can be respected and kept on the page. However, if they aren't notable or verifiable enough, someone can revert the page back to its previous version. I think that this is an interesting implmentation of the policy "Verifiablity Not Truth". It is the truth that Robot Chicken published a sketch in 2010 that included Darth Jar Jar, and was even voiced by Ahmed Best, so this is as close of an official publication of the Darth Jar Jar theory as you could get and this was five years before the Reddit thread. The Reddit guy no way broke the news on Darth Jar Jar, it had been used by Robot Chicken literally five years earlier. HOWEVER, it is not VERIFIABLE that this happened because no reliable source tells us what happened in the DVD and it would be original research to watch the DVD and claim that Darth Jar Jar did appear in it. Therefore, the article must, under the strictest interpretation of the policy, misleadingly only include the part about the Reddit thread (which makes people think that he broke the story in 2015, he was the first guy to come up with it) because that is the only verifiable information available. 
TheSkyIsGreen (talk) 02:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robot Chicken Edits 

message: JarJar sings odd songs 2001:56A:F837:5700:670F:32A9:D134:D43E (talk) 18:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DrowssapSMM 19:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 March 2024