Talk:History of Chicago

message: I'm taking a stab at organizing this page into subsections (incorporation, early days, etc.). Please play around with your thoughts on the logical formation of this.
--Jason 19:50, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)
I'd really like to create a comprehensive timeline for Chicago and would like suggestions on format. What we have today is very basic. What I have in my head is a sidebar listing on the left with the years and then several major colum headings with different colors that break out yearly events into columns by topics such as Politics, Culture, Population & Health, Arts & Education, Leisure & Sports, Work & Economy, etc. This is a format followed by many encylclopedias in print. Thoughts or suggestions? This will be a big task.
Also -  Take a look at this
--Jason 01:27, Jan 9, 2005 (UTC)
--In 1830s Chicago was mostly Yankee; all the French and Indians were long gone 67.176.74.236 05:54, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From the book called "Remaking Chicago", here is data on change in number of people employed in manufacturing. 1958: 329 thousand. 1972: 389 thousand. 1983: 258 thousand.
Just adding this in case anyone feels it might have use in this article or the general Chicago article. CalumetandHecla (talk) 19:40, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manufacturing decline 

message: I am not a wikipedian, but the writing in this article could use some editing.  The content is good, but the style is not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.84.29 (talk) 04:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall Quality of writing 

message: Of possible interest to editors of this article: DePaul University is accepting applications for a Wikipedia Visiting Scholars position with a possible focus on the history of Chicago. Through the Visiting Scholars program, educational institutions provide experienced Wikipedians with remote access to their libraries' research resources. The Wikipedian is given an official university login and agrees to create/improve articles on Wikipedia in a subject area of mutual interest. The positions are unpaid, remote, and usually go for 6 or 12 months. If you have at least 1000 edits, an account at least 1 year old, and experience improving content, you're eligible. For more information see Wikipedia:Visiting Scholars. --Ryan (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  DePaul University Wikipedia Visiting Scholar position 

message: Substituted at 17:59, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on History of Chicago. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061123154944/http://www.worldbusinesschicago.com/about/upload/20ChicagoSunTimes6-23-03.pdf to http://www.worldbusinesschicago.com/about/upload/20ChicagoSunTimes6-23-03.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.kennyconstruction.com/about/chicagoflood.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://cbs2chicago.com/vault/local_story_104140940.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: ???
Chicagohistory2 (talk) 20:09, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this page protected from editing? 

message: I don't see any information about the 1909 renumbering of Chicago street addresses.
I got to this question from the Wm. J. Cassidy Tire Building article. The building was constructed in 1902 at 117-125 N. Clinton (east side of Clinton). It was moved a few hundred feet east to make room for railroad tracks, so its former rear became the front at what is now 344 N Canal.
The article gives the two addresses: 117 N. Clinton and 344 N. Canal, leading to a erroneous impression the building was moved several blocks.
So I wanted to add a footnote or something saying 1903 addresses are not the same as modern addresses due to the 1909 renumbering. I figured I'd use a wikilink. 
Some references:
* Brief mention by the Chicago History Museum
* The 1909 renumbering book also courtesy of Chicago History Museum
* Here is a blog post Chicago Street Renumbering at chicagology.com
But I haven't found any information on same in Wikipedia. Not sure what other article could mention it, so I'm asking here. 
-- M.boli (talk) 23:28, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Street Renumbering in 1909 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* Home Insurance Building.JPG
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:23, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: First two paragraphs at History of Chicago#Politics in the 20th and 21st centuries are entirely unsourced and as a matter of policy (yes, on WP verifiability trumps due weight by a mile), they will be removed if no efforts are made to source them, the unsourced section and statements have been tagged accordingly in good faith to aid those interested in such an endeavor. Courtesy ping  Ghostbeach (talk) 00:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: p.s. I could’ve simply wiped the unsourced paragraphs quietly into oblivion on sight without saying anything (WP policy fully supports such a move), but I chose to be kind enough to give others a chance to save the content if so desired. Ghostbeach (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I fixed that by adding appropriate citations to several major books, And I also dropped  a long discussion about a minor personality Randy Kryn . Rjensen (talk) 01:11, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

text: I see I've been pinged awhile ago above, and would ask that someone, maybe , please delete my name from its obvious-to-any-Wikipedian undue weight placement in the last lead sentence. I've been told that removing your own name from an article is a COI violation, and am not sure of the accuracy of that, especially when it comes to something as blatantly inaccurate as this. The factoid has been in place for 10 days or so, which calls into question if anyone is really watching this page and, at a minimum, that it and several other Chicago political and history pages should receive protected status. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:42, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced, and will be removed if not fixed