lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Champlain (federal electoral district)

message: While the article has a lot of voting results, there is very little descriptive information in it as of today - so I am rating it as Stub class for now.  PKT(alk) 15:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I’m not sure how to fix this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Canadian_federal_election,_1979/Champlain exists, but its category is "1974 Canadian federal election results by riding".
I don’t know enough about how templates work to attempt to fix this without risking breakage. The 1979 results do exist in older (pre 2021) versions of the page that didn’t use templates. Splashcat62 (talk) 06:25, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing this out. I've replaced the erroneous template with the election box that used to be on this page.-- Earl Andrew - talk 06:29, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome, that was quick. Thanks Earl. Splashcat62 (talk) 06:43, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1974 results duplicated, and 1979 missing.
Talk:Oban Airport

message: Can anything be added about the current controversy about refuelling of night-time air ambulance flights.  Also reported in the Oban Times that traffic has dropped 50% since it was taken over by the council.          --jmb (talk) 16:20, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current controversy
Talk:MV Kenilworth

message: pershaps someone would care to rewrite this incident in a manner more keeping an encyclopedia. It currently reads as a POV emotive piece of tabloid crap, somewhat selective in facts.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.162.62.172 (talk • contribs) 17:21, 26 October 2006
:Sofixit! More information has been added as it became available. ..dave souza, talk 07:59, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Oct 24th Incident
Talk:Eugene F. Correia International Airport

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* 6.807443°N 58.105673°W
24.145.255.97 (talk) 10:47, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, moved to 6°48′20″N 58°6′20″W.  — Dispenser 19:50, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Ohrid St. Paul the Apostle Airport

message: :It is named after the St. Paul the Apostle, a Greek-speaking Jew and the second most important person in the history of Christianity.Encyclopedia Britannica, St. Paul the Apostle, 2008, O.Ed. "Paul was a Greek-speaking Jew from Asia Minor."
Could we please remove the above text and reference from the article. These facts about Saint Paul are available to anyone who wishes to click "St. Paul the Apostle" in the preceding line. That the apostle spoke Greek is neither controvesial nor relevant to the airport. Ample links are provided in the second paragraph to any reader wishing to learn more about the Macedonia naming dispute. A similar discussion recently took place at Talk:Skopje_Airport#Name_dispute_issues which concluded with an amicable agreement to remove non-essential information from the article. I believe a similar outcome would improve this article. Aramgar (talk) 04:58, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. BalkanFever 08:43, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Aramgar (talk) 06:05, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: St. Paul the Apostle, a Greek-speaking Jew
Talk:Teesside Airport railway station

message: | National Rail list the official name as having a hyphen in it.  This is an incorrect spelling of Teesside, but the official name of the station.  The new signing boards at the station lack the hyphen, but this is just a mistake by Northern Rail.  The official name has never changed.
Unless anyone can cite an official change of the name, not just a mistake by Northern Rail then I will revert the article name back to Tees-side Airport. Andrew Duffell (talk) 11:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The new signs say "Teesside", National Rail Enquires say the name is still "Tees-side" whilst the address listed there says "Teesside". Despite Northern Rail's new signs, here, here and here on their website still refers to "Tees-side" whilst elsewhere on the same site we have "Teesside". I'd therefore conclude that is isn't completely definite what the correct name is. All of this and the airport isn't even called "Teesside" any more. I'd ask that this is discussed however before it is renamed again. Adambro (talk) 11:34, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your input Adambro. I'll investigate further by dropping Northern and National Rail an email to see if we can get to the bottom of this. Andrew Duffell (talk) 11:47, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Have you dropped northen rail an email. Any luck?!? We need some pictures facing the airport. Buzza69 (talk) 13:22, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but they never replied. (It doesn't surprise me, Northern Rail don't do much right.) Andrew Duffell (talk) 22:17, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct, some of the oldest, shabbiest, dirtiest trains serve this line. Same as the busses in Redcar + Cleveland and Middlesbrough.Buzza69 (talk) 09:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Station Name

message: Can I just say - this is an excellent account of the state of the Teesside (or Tees-side) Airport railway station. The airport itself is already taking a fee from everyone who travels - but they can't negotiate with the rail companies or local authorities to improve communication for passengers. Well done to all contributors! Francis Hannaway (talk) 14:49, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Excellent page
Talk:Old Buckenham Airfield

message: Can you tell me why the asphalt runway was shortened?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clrichey (talk • contribs) 04:57, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asphalt runway shortening reasons?
Talk:Tawau Airport

message: the only international destination the airport serve is tarakan, but i think all airlines have stopped providing this service. i think the term 'International' should be dropped. furthermore, in the MAHB website, they named the airport: Tawau Airport --kawaputra 11:11, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you. If there is no opposition from anyone in a week's time, then I will move this to Tawau Airport. Thank you for realising that. --Zack2007 07:14, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  International airport?
Talk:Tauranga Airport

message: There are several statements/stats in this article that are outdated, particularly towards the end of the 'History' section. Videomaniac29 (talk) 08:13, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated Information 

message: Mt Cook Airline no longer services Tauranga so this has been removed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.93.210.203 (talk) 21:06, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mt Cook Airline
Talk:Old Sarum Airfield

message: I added a section on the two WW2 era operations/large map rooms with upper viewing galleries in brick-built buildings next to the airfield owned nowadays by Wessex Archaeology. The rooms are now the drawing office and the finds room.  I can't find a reference for this yet (I know because I used to work there) but here's a photo of the finds room with viewing gallery just visible in upper background:  86.133.213.161 (talk) 12:20, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operations /large map rooms with viewing galleries 

message: Is there any information on when 622 VGS left Old Sarum for Upavon?  82.132.241.153 (talk) 23:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: November 1978 per Berryman, Wiltshire Airfields in the Second World War p.158. Section updated accordingly. Wire723 (talk) 10:32, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  622 VGS 

message: The page currently says, "In 1963 622 (Volunteer) Gliding School (VGS) became based at Old Sarum and the School was amalgamated with the Amphibious Warfare School from Poole in Dorset to form the Joint Warfare Establishment, equipped with a few Whirlwinds and Wessexes."
This is incorrect. ATC gliding schools were not equipped with helicopters. I can't speak for the gliding school being amalgamated with the Amphibious Warfare School, but it seems extremely unlikely. Feels as if two separate points have been merged as one here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BackSeat (talk • contribs) 18:08, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Gavbadger (talk) 21:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volunteer Gliding School
Talk:Tatenhill Airfield

message: I removed the UKAirports box (again) because the template is really
meant for airports rather than airfields. There has been a discussion
about this on the talk page - Template_talk:UKAirports. Feel free
to add to that discussion if you think I am wrong. 
--Cheesy Mike 12:57, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: UKAirports template

message: Having recently flown into Tattenhill, the position given by Pooley's Flight Guide stuck in my mind - 5 nm west of Burton. Checked, and yes, I was right, so I altered it. However, subsequently checking with the AIP and measuring on the aviation chart shows 4nm to be right, so I have reverted. Emeraude 14:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Position 

message: This has recently been revised in the AIP from 450 feet to 439 and so I've modified this item. The nearest whole number of metres is now 133
Jovial John  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.153.189.116 (talk) 10:15, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airfield Elevation
Talk:Oliver Municipal Airport

message: This page should be renamed to Oliver Municipal Airport to match the official website naming convention and a redirect left in for the old short name.  The vague name has been confused (many times on FaceBook) with the Oliver Tambo International Airport which is usually referred to as OR Tambo International Airport and is located in South frica and not Canada and is an international airport.
Idyllic press (talk) 08:53, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change
Talk:100 Mile House Airport

message: This should be 100 Mile House Airport.  See similar name/move at Talk:One Hundred Mile House, British ColumbiaSkookum1 (talk) 17:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a comment but the Canada Flight Supplement has it listed in this format but at the same time uses 108 Mile Airport and if it is moved the airport error needs correcting. It should be either 100 Mile House Aerodrome or One Hundred Mile House Aerodrome. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 18:51, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be  100 Mile House Aerodrome, then, as "One Hundred Mile House" is never seen or heard in BC, although apparently on the other side of the Rockies there's other ideas..... ;-|; it's always said "hundred mile house" or just "hundred mile", never "one hundred mile house", and it's always "spelled" numerically, like 70 Mile, 108 Mile, 150 Mile etc.Skookum1 (talk) 19:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Too bloody cold. Well below normal. Still -40 and a couple of days ago that was the high for the day. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 20:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename/move
Talk:Mégantic (federal electoral district)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Disambiguating terms should indeed not be ambiguous. Defeats the purpose, lol. Support Red Slash 08:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Template talk:Islamic studies sidebar

message: This is an upper-left version of Template:Islamic studies. --Striver 17:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I've removed the links to Islamic architecture subtopics (Ottoman architecture, Chinese Islamic architecture, etc) for a few reasons. My understanding is that this template links to various disciplines relating to the Islamic world, not to all the subtopics in each discipline. The sister template at Template:Islamic studies simply includes the overview article, Islamic architecture, under the "Art" section, which is appropriate. Sidebars should be kept especially compact (per WP:SIDEBAR) and this also saves space. The current incomplete selection has no clear logic either, and the actual range of subtopics on architecture is far too large to include here. R Prazeres (talk) 04:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trimming architecture links
Talk:Orly Airport

message: why would the distance of the airport from Paris be expressed in nautical miles? It's in France, for goodness sake, the inventors of the metric system.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.205.3.113 (talk) 14:39, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nautical mile 

message: Does anyone know here where such data could be obtained?--Antemister (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passenger statistics, 1938 to 1960
Talk:Tagbilaran Airport

message: Created by and posted on: Johngabriel.ibay (talk) 14:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The airport building is renovated. 
Talk:Two Mountains (electoral district)

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Weak oppose. Currently, there is only one page called "Two Mountains", so there is no need to disambiguate. 81.98.251.134 (talk) 13:02, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Except it's not what people commonly refer to as "Two Mountains". There are other examples where a redirect dumps you to another title, and a hatnote to a dab page or a disambiguated page name, since it's not what is likely to be searched for. 70.55.200.131 (talk) 22:57, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, please don't redirect Two Mountains to Deux Montagnes, unless every entry on the latter page can be referred to as "Two Mountains", and vice versa. For instance, the AMT station is surely always referred to as "Deux-Montagnes", never "Two Mountains". 81.98.251.134 (talk) 16:10, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then there's no need for the page move. Bearcat (talk) 17:10, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Town and the Lake are commonly referred to as "Two Mountains" in English, such as CJAD radio traffic reports. 70.55.200.131 (talk) 22:53, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A topic whose proper name is "Two Mountains" should not play second fiddle for its own article title to things that get referred to as Two Mountains by some people but aren't actually named that. Bearcat (talk) 15:36, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We do that all the time, look at the "Kiev" vs "Kyiv", where Kyiv is the official name. Since the official names in Quebec are in French (and not English) the English names are unofficial, even if used by the English speaking Quebec community. 70.55.200.131 (talk) 04:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed we do do that all the time; according to current consensus codified in policy, the primary topic should get the page name, regardless of whether that is its "proper" name in some sense or not. In the absence of a primary topic (as appears to be the case here), a disambiguation page should be used. --Rogerb67 (talk) 21:33, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Sywell Aerodrome

message: Hasn't construction on the runway started. I'm sure I read that in the newspaper. I'm not sure though?
Regards.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Removebeforeflight (talk • contribs) 12:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.airscene.co.uk/aviation_museums/UK/sywell_aviation_museum.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:24, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Oulu Airport

message: I have seen on Flightradar24.com a flight with Jettime Finland (JJTG961) flying from Oulu, heading southwards. Please could someone clarify?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.247.53.49 (talk) 15:37, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't Jettime Finland operate flights from Oulu? 
Talk:Carleton (Ontario federal electoral district)

message: I dispute the neutrality of this article because I do not believe the election result boxes are neutral. Why aren't they in alphabetical order? Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Me-123567-Me (talk) 01:53, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is Wikipedia's method of style to place parties in order based on how they ranked in the previous election. In this case, I used the redistributed results from the Pundits' Guide to Canadian Elections, which breaks down the previous ridings' results down to its polling stations to come up with a fairly accurate depiction of how this riding would have voted in 2011 if it had its current boundaries. FUNgus guy (talk) 05:38, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Election results boxes
Talk:Crimson Avenger (Lee Travis)

message: So when was his last GA appearance?!  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  11:21, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead again 

message: There is nothing in this article on the character's publication history. It should be added to the article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:18, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Publication History
Talk:Oxford Airport

message: There were 70 items on Google News referring to the name change, as at 20th Aug 09. The re-branding seemed to put the airport 'on the map', if not in the way anticipated, and opened a brief debate on airport names and locations (eg Why do airports change names? BBC ) It seemed right to refer to 'press comment' in the article, though I am not sure if it has been referenced correctly. SkyeWaye (talk) 20:29, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry, getting your head round citation styles is a bit of a pain.  You've done fine, and produced an addition which is well backed up by sources.  I've tidied the paragraph up a bit and used a distance conversion template (we should try to use miles and kilometres as most international readers are not familiar with miles), but it was a lot better than many things you'll see in Wikipedia.  A note to bear in mind for the future is that punctuation goes before the reference, not after it.  All in all, a job well done! Skinsmoke (talk) 01:09, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change
Talk:Surrey/King George Airpark

message: FYI this airpark, at least at its present location, is permanently closed.
I don't know the rules for deletion, but is this stub notable enough to keep around?   — TARDIS builder💬     08:06, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Permanently closed 

message: Search only for NOTAMs at the NAV Canada website, typing in "CSK8" for this airpark, to see the notice dated "2009301240" (2020, Sept 30, 12:40) about this closure.   — TARDIS builder💬        02:24, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Permanent closure confirmed
Talk:Sunshine Coast Airport

message: Down the bottom of the article, the category section states that the article for Sunshine Coast Airport is un sourced while there is a reference there. So is it that it is a mistake that the category says that or is sourcing and referencing 2 different things??
Aflumpire 00:12, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Un scourced' 

message: I updated the article to give some options for people getting there and away, in an unencyclopedic negative tone. I'm hoping someone with a commercial interest will update it with more accurate information and a good QLD Tourism marketing spin. XQx (talk) 08:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Road transport to and from the airport 

message: The original IATA code for this airport when airline services were commenced in the early 1970s was OOH.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.68.187.138 (talk) 05:41, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airport code 

message: This may pop up when search MCY (The short term for magenta cyan yellow) Could make a not to be confused with comment on this, not necessary but it could clear up confusion. DXLB Muzikant (Removed as i got the tag wrong.) (talk) 16:29, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not To be confused with Magenta Cyan Yellow
Talk:Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://pips.org.pk/PRGs%20in%20PDF/PRG%20-%20COMMUNICATIONS%20%20FORMATTED.pdf. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Misarxist 12:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: :Civil Aviation Authority of Pakistan →  – As per official website, name has been changed and can be varified at: http://caapakistan.com.pk/ White.pearl7 (talk) 00:20, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Cecilia Alvear

message: This article has been reclassified as a start according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment. Capitalistroadster (talk) 08:10, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Reclassified as a start
Talk:Wellington South (federal electoral district)

message: Until just now, this page listed the Conservative candidate in the 1935 and 1940 elections as Hugh Guthrie, the MP who represented the riding 1900 to 1935. That seemed suspect to me, because not only does Guthrie's page list him as retiring in '35, but he also died in 1939… which, obviously, renders him unable to stand as a candidate a year later. So I checked the Parliament of Canada's website to clear this up. First, Guthrie's PARLINFO page does not list him as a candidate in '35 (let alone '40). Second, a history of the Wellington South riding shows several differences between the 1900-35 candidate vs the 35-40 candidate: the '35 candidate has a middle name (Comyn), no honorific, and a different profession. All this suggests that the candidate in 1935 and 1940 was, in fact, a different man named Hugh Guthrie. So I have changed the result tables accordingly. — Kawnhr (talk) 00:21, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hugh Guthrie" in 1935 and 1940