lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jonas Brothers

message: The info about their appearance on Hannah Montana Season 2 is in the history section twice, shortly after each other:
"On August 17, they guest-starred in an episode of the Disney Channel show Hannah Montana titled "Me and Mr. Jonas and Mr. Jonas and Mr. Jonas".
They also performed "We Got the Party" with Miley Cyrus in the episode, which premiered after High School Musical 2 and was viewed by 10.7 million people that night. [...] The Jonas Brothers made their acting debut in Season 2 of the Disney Channel series Hannah Montana, where they guest starred and performed "We Got The Party With Us" on the episode "Me and Mr. Jonas and Mr. Jonas and Mr. Jonas".]
Maybe the first part could be changed to
"On August 17, the Jonas brothers made their acting debut guest-starring in an episode of the Disney Channel show Hannah Montana titled "Me and Mr. Jonas and Mr. Jonas and Mr. Jonas". They also performed "We Got the Party" with Miley Cyrus in the episode, which premiered after High School Musical 2 and was viewed by 10.7 million people that night.
and then the second part can be left out. Alisio Star (talk) 10:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guest starring on Hannah Montana
Talk:Schoinoussa

message: www.schinoussa.gr/#!schinoussa/cih5 it's the Greek version of the commercial site www.schinoussa.com, hence it shouldn't be on the infobox.
Furthermore, it's correct to mention it as an accomodation site? It seems to be an advertisment link.
If confirmed it should be blacklisted. --Andyrom75 (talk) 19:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website 

message: Once again with the Greek Islands wikipedia is not using the most common English spelling (as it should according to wikipedia conventions). This article should be about "Schinoussa" and "Schoinousa" should redirect. Please follow the conventions. Google even corrects the use of the spelling Schoinousa. See:WP:UCRN 
85.73.234.72 (talk) 13:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most common name
Talk:Serifos

message: In my opinion, the 'Notes' tab in the article should be removed as in my opinion it is pointless to have an empty tab within the article. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 10:20, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 'Notes' tab should be removed
Talk:Sifnos

message: Sifnos is claimed to be 130km or 80 nautical miles south of Piraeus.  Which is it?  130km is 80 statute miles (`land miles') but only 70 nautical miles; 80 nautical miles is 148km.
Dricherby 16:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distance from Athens/Piraeus 

message: In the introduction paragraph the village of Kastro is said to be the second largest population centre on Sifnos. I have visited Sifnos many times and my recollection is that Kastro is no longer a large population centre. Gerald Adams 21:36, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kastro as the 2nd major population centre on Sifnos? 

message: I've removed the links http://www.sifnos.gr/index.php/en/promotion.html and http://http://sifnos.e-sifnos.com/, which are both links to pages aggregating commercial services on Sifnos like hotels, travel agents, etc., and as such are very clearly spam.  (The first is in the same domain as the official Sifnos government page, but that page itself is as I've described it.  The fact that it's in the same domain as the government page doesn't mean that it isn't commercial and isn't spam.)  I've added the link to what appears to be the actual official web site of the Sifnos local government; though it's in Greek, it may be of use to some readers of this page. Please don't revert this edit: commercial links are absolutely inappropriate to WP. Littlewindow (talk) 20:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please don't post spam links 
Talk:Skorpios

message: Even a stub on an island should state how many sq. km it is.  75.200.200.62 (talk) 02:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I make the area of Skorpios about 0.84 square kilometers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.254.132.106 (talk) 12:09, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area? 

message: I think it is pretty clear to anyone that the island resemble in shape to the American continent!!! People think that it is because it was shaped by great engineers of the ancient civilization of Atlantis in order to leave a sign of their deep knowledge of the geography of the world. Because of this legend or story, the owner of the island can be considered the heir of the mystical power that the scientists in that ancient civilization were believed to possess.
I think that a passage in the article should contain this important legend (history) which would explain the huge price of the little island and the fact that the powerful families of the word compete to be the owner of it!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.149.45.88 (talk) 13:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Atlantean legend

message: Taki wrote recently (September 2014) that a Russian "oligarch" -- a manure magnate -- had bought the island. True? 38.115.185.4 (talk) 17:18, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Rybolovleva has been mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.131.222 (talk) 11:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Her father seems to be active in potash.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.131.222 (talk) 11:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Potassium chloride is used as a chemical fertiliser.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.179.131.222 (talk) 12:02, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Purchased by Russian oligarch?

message: https://www.insider.com/russian-billionaire-skorpios-greek-island-luxury-resort-jackie-kennedy-2021-1 —⁠172.58.236.46 (talk) 15:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent article in ''Insider'' about oligarch's development plans
Talk:Skyros

message: Olympus isn't 792 m: this is Kokyla, in the south.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.41.205.30 (talk) 06:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Teen Second Life

message: MerchantVendor Vega 15:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is dumb :( I can't play then, though I've been wanting to.  W/e. BLASTEDT•(talk•contribs) 22:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, you have to verify by at least providing a credit card even for an MG account. (an used due to pronunciation of 'Emgee'. Aspengrey 16:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate Registration Requirements 

message: Could we have the second half of the article cleaned up (from "Main Grid Similarties" (sic)) - it currently consists of statements such as:
"The First Social Scene Group,The Emo Klan,Recently have had War Logs from the newest Religious Church,The Followers of Stan. The Followers of Stan are a Religious Group believeing in the Video Gaming God Stan,And have also had war intentions with the Chrisitan Groups."
--203.217.36.1 04:59, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General 

message: There seems to be avery few projects identified in TSL, whereas the Main adult Grid seems to have hundreds of islands. Can anybody give an idea of roughly how many islands/projects are going on in TSL? --mgaved 09:42, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Total number of projects in TSL 

message: Teen Grid closed http://community.secondlife.com/t5/Inworld/Bringing-Teens-to-Second-Life-s-Main-Grid/ba-p/670851 and http://community.secondlife.com/t5/Inworld/Teens-Welcome-to-Second-Life/ba-p/674615 Jan 21 they merged Teen Second Life and Second Life. Iatwork (talk) 16:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teen Grid closed
Talk:Low-voltage positive emitter-coupled logic

message: This page would be helped by a figure that described the voltage levels relative to the positive supply. --HelgeStenstrom 15:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It might also be helped by information about proper termination.  --jwilkinson 17:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figure to help 

message: Is there any indication about the input voltage range (VIL and VIH)?
ICE77 (talk) 00:31, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Input voltage range
Talk:Whitehouse.org

message: I changed the second sentence because it initially said this:
"Although it purports to be the "officious" website of the White House and the Presidential administration of the United States of America, in reality it is a parody"
"Officious" is not the same as "Official", so the sentence was nonsensical. I still feel like the word "parody" is overused in the opening text, but I left that. 121.44.141.214 15:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dinner: Impossible

message: THe show has only shown 2 seasons, and was alwats an hour long  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.65.102.49 (talk) 12:33, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you ever actually watched the show?  It's running its third season right now, and has always been a half-hour. --Drmargi (talk) 17:39, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My wife and I watched an episode last night entitled "Quince," (evidently episode 402) with Chef Irvine cooking in Puerto Rico, and the episode was an hour long.  I don't remember ever seeing an hour long episode before, only half-hour ones.  Not sure if this is a variation bewteen the producion seasons, or what, but both formats exist. Ljacone (talk) 13:06, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There have been a couple special episodes that ran one hour (Holiday Hope) being the first, but the show changed to a one-hour format this season. --Drmargi (talk) 04:26, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length 

message: The names of Symon's and Irvine's sous chefs should be mentioned. Badagnani (talk) 03:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sous chefs 

message: Can someone clarify how the show began its 4th season in 2008, dispite having premiered in only 2007? A breakdown of the seasons over a year and a half would be appreciated. TheHYPO (talk) 07:29, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure it has to do with production schedules, just like Survivor is approaching their 20th season, despite only having been on the air for 10 years (or whatever the number is). A year does not equal a season anymore. SpikeJones (talk) 14:02, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seasons? 

message: Did u ever come to erie pa to help with a wedding bar-q we love your shows  i would like if u could help us with our wedding in july 4 2011  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.239.173.244 (talk) 05:16, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  hello
Talk:Limax maximus

message: The content of the 'Indigenous Distribution' and 'Non-indigenous Distribution' sections is apparently partially contradictory. It needs to be reviewed by an expert.
PhilG (talk) 09:22, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I took out the listing of Scandanavia in the first list. Invertzoo (talk) 13:46, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: A note
Talk:Limacus flavus

message: There is no such thing as an invalid taxon or an unacceptable taxon in taxonomy.  There are such things as subjective junior synonyms, objective junior synonyms, available nomens, and unavailable nomens.  One or more taxonomists' revisions involving a genus switch does not make the former term "invalid" or "unacceptable".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FCC8:E846:FD00:E9F8:9889:4EF0:C916 (talk) 23:39, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Invalid Taxon" 

message: free images:
* http://www.flickr.mud.yahoo.com/photos/maximillian_millipede/tags/limaxflavus/ --Snek01 00:59, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  images 
Talk:How to Be a Little Sod

message: I changed the title of the second book from 'Look who's talking: further diaries of a little sod' to "Look Who's Walking: Further Diaries of a Little Sod'. This is correct because it says so on the very last page of the first book. Also tweaked punctuation and a few sentences.
How To Be A Little Sod is a really good book.
DoberStaff (talk) 15:00, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change 

message: I changed the title of the second book from 'Look who's talking: further diaries of a little sod' to "Look Who's Walking: Further Diaries of a Little Sod'. This is correct because it says so on the very last page of the first book. Also tweaked punctuation and a few sentences.
How To Be A Little Sod is a really good book.
DoberStaff (talk) 15:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change
Talk:That's what she said

message: I think we have too many exmaples. Please suggest the ones (up tp three) that should be removed, and people can basically vote on which ones are not very good and do not belong in the article. Randomfrenchie 03:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples

message: I agree with Randomfrenchie, it looks very unencyclopedic.
Kaaos 20:05, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what she said! TFighterPilot (talk) 21:42, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: I tried to just prune this article back to a stub, but I couldn't find any sources even to provide a definition.  I figured a redirect to Double Entendre was probably for the best.  Chunky Rice (talk • contribs) 22:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not one thing in that article that's not original research.  I agree that it's a common phrase, but unless we can source it, it doesn't belong here.  If you like, we could take it to AFD for a more general discussion.  And I don't know what you mean by your last comment.  Double Entendre is a common term, even more so than this one. Chunky Rice 14:51, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I agree, I'll go ahead and do the merge in a day or so if there's no objections. --Nuujinn (talk) 01:11, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be great. Thanks :) -- Quiddity (talk) 21:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect

message: I think redirecting to Double entendre is an issue because of "principle of least astonishment" (this specific case is referenced here). Might it be better to redirect to the modern usage section on the page? -- Amazins490 (talk) 05:44, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Target of redirect 

message: If anyone's considering changing this to something more than a dab, here's a source: "The cheapest shot of all, of course, is the ancient one-liner, 'That's what she
said.' This reply can be used after virtually any remark, however innocent, ..."
EgoSpeak: Why No One Listens to You, by Edmond G. Addeo and Robert E. Burger.
You can see the snippet I quoted here. —JerryFriedman  (Talk) 03:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ref 

message: I really think the Office's connection with TWSS is over-emphasized.  It barely even warrants a mention.  There were perhaps a dozen episodes of the Office where Michael Scott actually said it.
76.65.20.250 (talk) 01:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what she said!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.88.240 (talk) 20:36, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Office
Talk:Shah Jo Risalo

message: Mazmoon 103.82.123.90 (talk) 21:41, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  shah abdul latif bhitai
Talk:Paul Shapiro (author)

message: I think that those items written by Paul Shapiro should be summarized as content of this page, in-so-far as it relates to portraying his actions/activities.  Including the promotional or personal positions expressed in an Opinion/Editorial is suitably addressed by simply summarizing it in article body or by relaying quotations from his work. Naturally I have no objections to articles written ABOUT the subject of the article: Paul Shapiro. Any thoughts? Ares0524 15:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Self Promotional?

message: Ryan Shapiro is a well-known animal rights activist, and three years older than Paul. Are these two family? Jay Dubya (talk) 22:59, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related to [[Ryan_Shapiro|Ryan Shapiro]]? 

message: edited the article to say Shapiro is no longer at HSUS. However he has a staff page on their website, but http://www.paul-shapiro.com/ could be read as him having left. "for 13 years Shapiro also served as a spokesperson and vice president for The Humane Society of the United States." Utsill (talk) 22:40, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The staff page is now gone, so I am reverting my reversion. Utsill (talk) 13:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. Someone else already got to it once the page died. Utsill (talk) 13:23, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Paul Shapiro no longer at HSUS?
Talk:Windows Support Tools

message: Started new Topic due to link being broken, and no other page was available that addressed the support tools query initiated as part of the "Windows Registry" entry.
Richard416282 15:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Start of Topic 

message: The Initial reason behind adding the page was due to a flaw in the original article not having a verifieable reference when clicked on it.
Two times now, an editor has flagged this page as being "Blatant" advertising, .
The Article has been reformated to be in the context of a quotation from the Microsoft website with a secondary paragraph of my own words indicating the Caveat of the Direction. WHile te quote is for specific website (microsoft) It is the only way that the reference can be cited!
Unless, there are additional tags that can be used in the original article , and have the original fixed.
Richard416282 16:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated Portion of Page

message: Ok, Now Luigi30 went and deleted the whole page. 
I have revised the content, but still have incleded the link to the tool that was not addressed in the article Windows registry.
Richard416282 17:57, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of Windows Tool page by Luigi30
Talk:Peter Roskam/Archive4

message: An admin asked me to remain here, so I will --BenBurch 21:07, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By the way, Dino, you want to complain that I am wikistalking?  Bring it on. --BenBurch 21:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've abandoned NOTHING. 

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. This template was previously posted to the article with a POV edit summary. I've replaced it with the original and nominated the fork-template for deletion. --Kyaa the Catlord 13:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of Template:{{ucfirst:Anglicanism2}}
Talk:LINPACK

message: There are now actually 3 benchmarks called LINPACK (which is confusing).
  
#The first is the original benchmark by Jack Dongarra.  The rules state that you are not allowed to change the code in any way, not even the comments.  It is therefore a test of your Fortran environment rather than the top speed of your computer.  The size of the matrix is small by today's standards.   
#The second is the LINPACK 1000, or TPP benchmark ("Toward Peak Performance) on nxn matrices with n=1000, but you are allowed to replace calls to particular functions with your own linear equation solver, and even change n.   
#The third and newest benchmark is the HPC benchmark ("Highly Parallel Computing"), appropriate to clusters where the work can be distributed via MPI or PVM. 
I will try to flesh in the article to make these distinctions clearer, and verify that I've actually got the particulars right.
--Wormholio 16:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The paper in question is available at http://www.netlib.org/benchmark/performance.ps Jbradfor 20:54, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Crossfire (manga)

message: I wonder if anyone has scan pictures of Heinkel and Yumiko/Yumie to add to the profiles. Elwin Blaine Coldiron 03:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heinkel and Yumiko/Yumie pictures 

message: I felt that, owing to the fact that the Crossfire stories are more of independent shorts rather than a series (the only recurring element is the characters) I felt that 'refers to three short stories' was more appropriate than calling it a manga in its own right.
:I don't think so. The same argument could be used for Archie and Donald Duck. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 19:25, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: About my edit
Talk:Chrysler 300M

message: Wasn't the redesigned 3.5L V6 also given to the Dodge Intrepid R/T, available in 2001, a few years before the Chrysler Pacifica was released to the public? --oZ (talk) 02:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the 3.5L V6?
Talk:Chrysler Cirrus

message: I don't understand how this article is confusing. Everything is explained and defined as well as possible. If the person who tagged it as confusing would clarify this for me, then it would really help. Bavaria II (talk) 16:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm confused why it's confusing??? 

message: I second that, I'm not all too sure what the problem is with this article, it seems to be pretty straightforwardly explained and written clearly. AL3X AYCH (talk) 01:38, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am also confused by this..?
Talk:Black Girl (1966 film)

message: Maybe just because I'm a film freak, but I have more often heard this film as La Noire de... than Black Girl. Generally Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films) says English is best, unless the original title is more known (for example: Les Demoiselles de Rochefort vs. Young Women of Rochefort). - AKeen 17:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?
Talk:Distribution list

message: There is no mention of mailing( by post ) lists (Businesslists 16:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

message: "In effect, only members of a distribution list can send mails to the list" seems to confuse the subject of the article with a "mailing list".  Was there a typo here?  My understanding is that a distribution list is just a list of addresses stored for the convenience of one or more users of email client software to enable a user to send mail to all addressees simultaneously.  It does not have membership and one addressee cannot see the address of another addressee in order to communicate with them.  A "mailing list" is a membership group that a user may join in order to send emails to all other members via a posting address and receive emails similarly sent by other members.AlanS1951 (talk) 21:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinction between subject and a mailing list
Talk:Rap Cat

message: The article seems to be written oddly. Does anyone agree?
-Domovoi 21:33, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article writing

message: I removed the sentence He is voiced by Christine Cavanaugh. It was unsourced in the article, and I couldn't verify it. I left a note on the talk page of the school IP that added it. Wodup 06:16, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Voice

message: This is a silly page, and I'm proud to be part of it. I'm trying to keep it as dry and "encyclopedic" as possible, regardless of the fact it concerns a rapping puppet cat who hawks delicious burgers. 808 20:00, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tabs on the Cat 

message: "though why a rapping cat puppet would be an enticement for customers is unclear."
This seems to be an opinion.  It needs to be reworded or removed.  I suggest classifying it as absurdist humor, rather than using the word unclear to link to the Absurdist Humor wiki page. Timooo0 16:08, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinionated wording? 

message: It would be nice... Anyone have a bag?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.207.226.10 (talk) 05:44, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  anyone have a scan of the actual bag?