Talk:Nationalist terrorism

message: Nationalist terrorism was proposed for deletion. This talk section is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This talk section is no longer live. Further comments should be made below the archived discussion rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS
Nationalist Terrorism should be deleted it is a list without attribution. Unattributed label of terrorism violates NPOV rule. --Alberuni 18:04, 28 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article for deletion. Archived discussion 

message: I maintain that a great deal of respectable organizations do not consider the PLO a terrorist organization; especially considering the tough policies employed in recent years by U.S. and Israeli governments with regards to refusing to negotiate with terrorists and terrorists factions. The claim that the PLO is a terrorist organization is a POV statement that is made by members of the American and Israeli right-wings.
69.139.231.149 01:31, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is an interesting link: .  Note, the Tanzim are part of the PLO. Jayjg 01:54, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  PLO 

message: I maintain that a great deal of respectable organizations do not consider the PLO a terrorist organization; especially considering the tough policies employed in recent years by U.S. and Israeli governments with regards to refusing to negotiate with terrorists and terrorists factions. The PLO is recognized by the U.N. and the U.S. as the voice of the Palestinian people. The claim that the PLO is a terrorist organization is a POV statement that is made by members of the American and Israeli right-wings. 69.139.231.149 18:00, 3 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The article does however say "The following are nationalist groups, which in some circles have been deemed "terrorist":", in an attempt at neutrality it says that the listed groups have been considered by people as terrorist organizations, it seems that it does not make the judgment one way or another. Garden Stater 09:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Excuse me but that is a disgraceful statement.
The Ira of today are not the same Ira of 1916, the ones who fought for the freedom of my country... who ever wrote that should have  ahistory lesson if they are one in the same then so are The Army Of the Repuplic of Ireland and Fianna Fail and Fianna Gael....they were all started by Ex 1916/1922 I.R.A. men...
also the IRA existed before 1916 as the I.R.B amonst other things.... Owwmykneecap 03:45, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I.R.A. 1916- 

message: If the definition of nationalist terrorism is correct on this page, then the SOL were not. The British were not an occupying foreign regime, nor did they set up an "illegitimate" state on what is now the US. The SOL were Republicans (much like the IRA), but that doesn't mean they had the same nationalist agenda as the IRA. The British OCCUPY Northern Ireland. The British created the colonies in North America; there was no pre-existing nation-state on that spot. -Libertarian92
:What about the natives who were wiped out?  I also sure hope you realize the contradiction between your "libertarian" politics and the PIRA's socialist politics.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.146.132.220 (talk) 16:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sons of Liberty Were Not Nationalist

message: Substituted at 00:56, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nationalist terrorism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080507081227/http://domino.un.org/unispal.nsf/9a798adbf322aff38525617b006d88d7/45fc0c6e511ec0c5802564d400560ca0%21OpenDocument%26Highlight%3D0%2Cterrorists%2Cbernadotte to http://domino.un.org/unispal.nsf/9a798adbf322aff38525617b006d88d7/45fc0c6e511ec0c5802564d400560ca0%21OpenDocument%26Highlight%3D0%2Cterrorists%2Cbernadotte
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk)  02:11, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose - ngrams , scholar  , and Google News results  show a strong preference for "nationalist terrorism". estar8806 (talk) ★ 16:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Oppose: Ditto. Terrorism brackets tend to use the overarching name for the associated ideology. That terrorism occupies the extreme fringe of a movement is a notion self-contained within the typology of terrorism. Hence it is right-wing terrorism, not far-right terrorism, and left-wing terrorism, not far-left terrorism, etc. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:04, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 August 2023