lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ústí nad Labem

message: Try close deal about Aussig, please.—10:43, 11 November 2004‎ Mikeshk 
:What? — LlywelynII 00:29, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Close deal

message: It seems that since this is discussing a Czech city, that the Czech name of the river should be used, particularly since the name of the city itself refers to the river (Ústí nad Labem being roughly translated to "Ústí on the Labe").  I would think that changing the reference to be the Labe rather than the Elbe, with a reference to the river being known more generally as The Elbe, would be a reasonable solution.--Igjeff 18:57, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. . — LlywelynII 00:29, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: River name

message: This was'n a wall, but only antinoise screen! All this cause was only political speech. I'm living in Usti. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 160.218.164.51 (talk) 10:13, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matiční Street Wall 

message: How do i get there from prague or Germany? Which part of Germany is nearest to usti nad labem? --116.14.68.30 (talk) 09:29, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  how to get there from Prague or Germany? 

message: Famous pin-up model Milena Velba was born in Ústí nad Labem. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 94.228.237.230 (talk) 21:29, 21 August 2017.
:After attempted to add entry was quicly reverted as not notable. Rusty5231B (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Explained in the edit summary. She has no page on English Wiki, so she is definitely not as famous as you say. By the way, according to Google, she is primarily a pornographic film actress. FromCzech (talk) 05:53, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milena Velba 

message: I am going to boldly assert that the folks at Britannica made a mistake here, and would love to see more sources that attest to these names being used in English, preferably some actual usage of them. Before the 19th century Czech orthography reform that changed AU into OU, the name of the city was spelled "Austí nad Labem" (see e.g. Palacký), which that edition of Britannica seems to have mis-read and printed as "AUSSIG, Aussyenad, or Labem". This is surely an error. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:39, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking on Google Books, I can't find "Aussyenad" in anything bar Britannica and copycats of it, which seems to support my theory. Surely there would be some other examples of usage available from before that edition of Britannica was published, if this were anything other than a prehistoric typo. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 11:47, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  aka "Aussyenad" and "Labem"
Talk:Zrenjanin

message: As per scope, the articles of Nova Barcelona and New Barcelona (duplicates), which deal with 1735–38 history, should be merged into the history section.--Zoupan 18:14, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. The duplicates have now merged, and I'd argue shouldn't be merged in on the grounds that, while the region in which Nova Barcelona existed is now within the suburb boundaries of Zrenjanin, the town itself was sufficiently distinct in origin from the current settlement that it is worth distinguishing its history on the existing separate page. Klbrain (talk) 10:50, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given lack of support over almost 2 years. Klbrain (talk) 12:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Barcelona 

message: in the article it is stated that in rusyn the name of the city is Зрењанин. i doubt that rusyn cyrillic script has that letter "њ", which is only found in serbian cyrillic script. given that rusyn might be not that standardised ("different orthographies have been developed, in most cases using variants of the cyrillic script), i would suggest to transcribe the name à la bulgare or à la russe. something like Зренянин. just a suggestion though.Sacdegemecs (talk) 02:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  name in rusyn
Talk:Campaign

message: Campaigning is a certain where approach to a variety of challenges or problems. It can be described as the management of change by following a specific set of guidelines. Peter Metzinger, a physicist and former Greenpeace Campaigns Director in Switzerland, developed a formula according to which campaigning is the product of (strategic) communications and (direct) interventions (into processes or conditions). 
Campaigning = (strategic) Communication X Interventions
As communication can be described as the product of information and interaction, and the word «strategic» includes the presence of a clear intention, you can also write the formula as:
Campaigning = Intention X Information X Interaction X Intervention
This might sound a bit strange, but it actually covers the most specific campaigning approach as it serves best the purpose of helping organisations to face the challenges of dynamics, complexity and rapid changes in the environment: it integrates communication tools and direct intervention tools and offers thus a very wide spectrum of instruments, much broader than classical communication disciplines can offer.
More information for German speakers can be found in Metzinger's book: Business Campaigning also good.
Insert non-formatted text here
--220.225.215.237 09:10, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bjørn Grinde

message: This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Bjorn Grinde.  The consensus was to keep it.  dbenbenn | talk 02:16, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Okay, to clarify Darwinian medicine is clearly okay, though you might have mentioned that the Williams who wrote one of the books was the George Williams.  Anyway, Darwinian happiness is more difficult; we have a policy of no original resarch, and in fact User:Wyllium has replaced your content with an article on the book. Dunc|☺ 15:53, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darwinian stuff
Talk:Soham

message: Should some or all of the stuff about the murders be moved to Soham murders? Harry 12:12, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The wangford that is is linked to in this article is not the right one. If you look on multimap.com etc. there is a wangford in cambridge and one in suffolk. This article incorrectly links to the one in suffolk. However, I am new to wikipedia and don't want to disrupt this article for fear of making a mistake.
The above is wrong, it is Wangford in West Suffolk, next door to lakenheath airbase.
: No, the above is right in saying that the wrong Wangford is linked to. The Wangford linked to is clearly in EAST suffolk and definitely more than 10 miles away from Soham, and definitely nowhere near Lakenheath. And please sign your comments. 128.232.242.178 (talk) 22:49, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wangford 

message: Ddd 49.126.207.252 (talk) 13:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social
Talk:Nordic Mobile Telephone

message: Should parts of this article really be in past tense? The network is still running in Sweden, and even the data service is still available.
(Moved ARP talk to its own page)
:I think it was shut down in Sweden in 2007.212.162.177.102 (talk) 12:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

message: Siminn has closed down it's NMT system from today (1st September 2010). According to there own news, and also in accordance with there own frequency permit on 450Mhz band. Jonfr (talk) 09:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Síminn Iceland closes down NMT 

message: There is no mention of NMT service on Skylink's website, only LTE-450 is mentioned. It's unclear whether the service is still available.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gentleman wiki (talk • contribs) 13:53, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skylink
Talk:Diocese of Sodor and Man

message: I have slapped a tag on about this article's neutrality issues.
Firstly, it does not make clear that the Isle of Man has never been part of England.
Secondly, there is the more serious issue of historical continuity. Anglicans like to pretend that their dioceses and bishoprics have this, but in this particular case, the article is written as if the Anglican and pre-Reformation diocese are one and the same. Certainly not. They are different denominations, and the Church of England appropriated the Roman Catholic names and titles. Along with their property...--MacRusgail (talk) 14:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biases 

message: Did the Act of Uniformity stipulate English as the only ecclesiastical language, as this article seems to suggest? Possibly, but I've never heard that. I know that historically there was an English-language preference in the Church of England in Wales, for example, but the SPCK under John Phillips was engaged in Welsh translations of the Prayer Book etc by the beginning of the 18th century, and certainly the Act of Uniformity applied in Wales...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.69.105 (talk) 15:25, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Manx

message: When Rev W Awdry needed a location for his Railway Series of books, he thought of the Diocese of Sodor and Man, and invented the Island of Sodor between Man and the Mainland. This is presumably the Imaginary Map that is mentioned in the first section. Would a reference (correctly cited) be encyclopaedic or just trivial clutter. Would a map of Sodor (with context explicitly stated) be appropriate? OrewaTel (talk) 12:50, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literary Reference
Talk:Roy Hay (musician)

message: The second sentence is completely garbled. I know nothing of Culture Club or else I would fix it. --Calton 14:13, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Has anybody got a link that confirms that Robinson Reid of This Way Up is the same John Robinson Reid of 90s band Nightcrawlers, Absolute Radio 80s mentioned this fact about a week ago [on Matthew Rudd's Forgotten 80s show] but there is not much info about the duo online apart from a few videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iSNLNkMPSI and Discogs giving John Reid's full name  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.168.11 (talk) 10:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: John Robinson Reid
Talk:The Chevin

message: I agree with you, Yorkgate looks like a roman road, in that it is straight, and reasonably wide.  The track on the ridge appears to be neither.
But we should get the user User:Jschwa1 who contributed that paragraph to Otley to comment.
http://www.romans-in-britain.org.uk/map_romans_roads_in_britain.htm
As far as I can find out from online sources (I won't be able to get near a library for a while), ther was a roman road running from Ilkley, via a fort at Menston, over the chevin, through Yeadon, via the fort north of Adel, and then on to Tadcaster and York. One site says that it follows The Grove in Ilkly, Otley Old Road and Wigton Lane. But I can't find any reference to the exact route between Menston and Adel.
I take it Jshwa1 is referring to the track with right of way which runs parallel to Yorkgate, past Intake Farm, Braken End Farm, and Woodlands Farm.
http://dnausers.d-n-a.net/leodis-leeds/acorn.html
This page states that the route of the road over Guisely moor (i.e., just south of the Chevin) is marked on old OS maps.
http://www.hotpots.ndirect.co.uk/Lancashire/romammantoyork.htm
Ben@liddicott.com 10:44, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  This should help. 

message: The source for the fact about the Roman Road came from a council leaflet about Chevin Forest Park. Obviousely, it could be wrong, so if anyone has a better insight.......
Jschwa1 16:21, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 
Talk:Synchronous Data Link Control

message: SDLC is the data link protocol under Systems Network Architecture (SNA). HDLC is the ISO variant of Synchronous Data Link Control (SDLC) protocol from IBM.
SNA replaced Binary Synchronous (BSC) protocol in the 1970s at the primary mainframe to mainframe communications protocol. SDLC was and has remained the data link protocol for remote terminal and data entry equipment for mainframe systems. The Normal Response Mode (NRM) of HDLC is equivalent to SDLC.
:So are you saying that SDLC was first, and HDLC was derived from it, adding the balanced response modes?  Or did HDLC come first, with IBM simplifying it, removing the balanced response modes?  Or were they both derived from some other protocol? Guy Harris 10:47, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is correct that SDLC was devoloped by IBM and that HDLC was derived from it and became a "superset" with additional features.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.237.142.10 (talk • contribs) 05:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).   Guy Harris (talk) 04:09, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Should also mention International Computers Limited (ICL) C-03 protocol. This was ICL's equivalent protocol, which formed part of the ICL Information Processing Architecture (IPA). See the IBM Systems Network Architecture (SNA) wikipedia article. 66.155.23.67 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 12:51, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICL C-03 

message: As well as being an influential protocol, the IBM's specification of SDLC was hugely influential. It was the origin of the notion that network protocols provide "services" to the next layer of protocol or application. It introduced the useful distinction betwen a protocol's over-the-wire "format" and the algorithmic "procedures" at each end-system, giving a specification for each. The use of state machines to specify the "procedures" was new.
This level of rigour meant that SDLC attracted the first academic treatment of protocols. For example, proofs that there were no undescribed states in the state machine, that the state machine couldn't loop without consuming incoming frames.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gdt (talk • contribs) 03:54, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specification of SDLC was ground breaking
Talk:Etoy

message: The article about the art group is confusing and poorly written, and doesn't even explain what the "hijiack" linked from it was about (it was a demonstration of the unreliability and manipulability of the first generation of search engines - those based on keywords). Also, a picture of the etoy.TANKs would be nice
thanks for the hint. i just put some new material. pictures would be nice! maybe etoy can insert some?
There was a POV tag talking about a POV dispute.  However, this talk page doesn't show any such dispute.  POV tag removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.97.207.142 (talk) 00:07, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Priority inversion

message: Just an observation.  I followed the link to the Mars expedition to find out more on this example of priority inversion.  I didn't find anything in the body of the text that suggested obvious priority inversion; the text essentially says 'probably the battery ran out and it froze'.  It just occurs to me to check the references on *this* article, as maybe this will explain more.  But it would be nice to have a smoother linkage to this interesting and prominently featured example. Jebbo 21:12, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mars expedition

message: The second-to-last paragraph of this article, about priority ceilings, should be expanded to include better explanation for non-technical readers.  68.50.203.109 03:54, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I reformatted the solutions for better readability, this also makes the link to the priority ceiling article more visible. Vinsci 14:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Priority ceilings

message: Concise and too the point.  Thanks so much!   Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 19:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very well written article - Thanks!
Talk:Fifth disease

message: "A significant increase in the number of cases is seen every three to four years; the last epidemic year was 1998."  Where wwas this? Rich Farmbrough 15:36, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed this sentence. Rich   Farmbrough 13:48, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Epidemic - location?

message: when diseases causing childhood rashes were enumerated  - Enumerated by whom?  When?  Bovlb 05:05, 2005 Mar 20 (UTC)
:Hmmm "[From its being fifth in frequency of rash-producing childhood diseases.]
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition" Rich   Farmbrough 13:57, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: Perhaps Slap Cheek is the most common name? 13:53, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: This section seems to have factual errors.  The referenced articles contradict some of the statements here.
"Individuals with fifth disease are most infectious before the onset of symptoms."
Is contradicted by, "The first stage, occurring after an incubation period of four to 14 days, consists of a mild prodromal illness characterized by low-grade fever, headache and gastrointestinal symptoms. This stage, which often is unrecognized, corresponds with the period of viremia and the period of contagion." (from Sabella C, Goldfarb J (October 1999). "Parvovirus B19 infections". Am Fam Physician. 60 (5): 1455–60. PMID 10524489. Retrieved 2009-11-06.)
Additionally, this statement is misleading, "When symptoms are evident, there is little risk of transmission; therefore, symptomatic individuals don't need to be isolated."
Symptoms of Fifth include fever, headache and gastrointestinal symptoms, and when those are present individuals are contagious. Perhaps the statement should specify symptoms unique to Fifth (red cheeks). That would a true statement.
:  We have a good write-up of fifth disease at Parvovirus B19#Fifth disease - better than here, in fact.  I was about to add a "main article" cross-reference there when I realised a reference from here to there would probably be more helpful to the reader!  – -SquisherDa (talk) 07:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Transmission

message: Improved article as described in "Guiding framework"
I felt that the added subheadings, such as: vulnerable populations, causes, etc. provided relevant and pertinent structure to the article. I felt that since many people often turn to Wikipedia for medical information these additions would allow them to gain a big picture understanding of the disease. In particular, "Vulnerable Populations" provided reviews and meta-analysis in a chronological manner which allows for people to see the evolution of the disease from various stand points.  As for some slight stylistic changes that could be made, would to be consistent with the capitalization of subheadings, for example "Mechanism of Parovirus" vs. "Mechanism of parovirus" (how it is right now). Sdo0001 (talk) 21:59, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Review
Talk:Rafael Advanced Defense Systems

message: The official name of the organization, as provided by the company, is:
RAFAEL Armament Development Authority, Ltd.
RAFAEL is an Hebrew acronym (thus the difficulty in translation), and so to avoid confusion, should we move the title to 'RAFAEL' as opposed to 'Raphael'?  I have rarely seen Raphael used in technical literature compared to Rafael or RAFAEL.
Forgot to sign the above comments... Joshbaumgartner 16:25, 2004 Nov 11 (UTC)
I see no problem to moving it, but not to its long corporate name. IZAK 16:34, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Moved page to its better known corporate name at RAFAEL Armament Development Authority. IZAK 16:41, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page moved 

message: This Israeli site: [Haaretz] talks about the will of this Israeli company to invest in Brazil.Agre22 (talk) 14:31, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Investments in Brazil

message: In my source, EMET was rename RAFAEL or Raphaël or Rafael ( this is the translation of רפאל - מערכות לחימה מתקדמות בע"מ, : RAFAEL Armament Development Authority) in 1954 but the article It was finally reorganized as Rafael in 1958.[3]
SO? some help with that? Alfad (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:45, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with date 1954 or 1958?

message: Why does "Wallbuster" redirect here? This article doesn't mention Wallbuster.
Wallbuster is an early HESH warhead developed in Britain during WWII. It has nothing to do with Israel or Raphael Defence Systems.
I would simply remove the redirect, and leave "Wallbusters" as a redline wikilink, but I've never done that before. I may figure it out in the fullness of time, but hopefully someone will step in and save me the trouble.
MrDemeanour (talk) 17:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wallbuster 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puffery
Many of these IDF/IM articles contain a lot of PUFFERY. The embellishment and silly claims of how great things are. 
I removed much of this many times - see edits. I am totally trying to create an NPOV tone - I am sure many products are great - but claims of  'GREATEST' 'THE BEST' - or 'CLASSIFIED' - why the editor keeps stating ALL projects are classified adds zero encyclopedic value = have no place in an encyclopedic article - could folks not add this PUFFERY. It reads a lot more NPOV when you do not do this. BeingObjective (talk) 16:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pufferey 

message: The intro - now simplified. Likely was a tad repetitive. BeingObjective (talk) 23:15, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro.
Talk:Kanbun (era)

message: Somebody needs to fix this page so that it differentiates between the Kanbun era and the Kanbun style of writing Japanese texts.
:I added a hat-note in response to this anonymous suggestion ... but I don't recall seeing this done before.  Perhaps it is not correct? --Tenmei (talk) 21:20, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Not writing
Talk:City of Belmont

message: I belive during the 1990's when the airport was leased to WA Airports Corporation the suburb of Newburn was renamed Perth Airport Gnangarra 07:35, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Newburn or Perth Airport