Talk:CMLL World Lightweight Championship

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on CMLL World Lightweight Championship. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6LDla2zy5?url=http%3A%2F%2Fentertainment.howstuffworks.com%2Fpro-wrestling.htm to http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/pro-wrestling.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://cmll.com/noticias.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cmll.com/02_resultados/dom_familiares/dom_familiares.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cmll.com/02_resultados/dom_familiares/dom_familiares.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It should be remembered that plot summaries of fiction such as this should have a limited number of words, eg 700 words for a feature film, per MOS:PLOT Siuenti (씨유엔티) 04:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[MOS:PLOT]] 

message: Is Lucha ilbre like an actual thing? Why is it in so many articles  ? Siuenti (씨유엔티) 04:32, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucha ilbre???? 

message: Can someone remind me which reliable sources cover the topic in depth, per WP:N?
:If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list.
:"Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 06:49, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: *QED.  MPJ-DK  20:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Er and were any of these available for me to look at? Siuenti (씨유엔티) 21:44, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

text: The one we can see is #18, which says apparently "Southern California wrestler Tommy Williams was announced as champion in October so he must have defeated Rocky Romer on September 15", which doesn't look like in-depth coverage to me. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 21:46, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: As I stated, they had a section specifically recapping any activity around the championship, just happened that it was not a banner  year for the championship.  MPJ-DK  21:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: So that's strike one, I've taken the liberty of striking #18 out. Do you care to pitch any more of into our field of vision? Siuenti (씨유엔티) 21:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:N 

message: How are we supposed to know that a "match that received no mainstream coverage" actually happened, and isn't just kayfabe? Siuenti (씨유엔티) 19:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Match that received no mainstream coverage? 

message: How do we know that Súper Luchas is an independent, reliable publication with a reputation for fact checking, and not just some rag which regurgitates whatever CMLL tells it to? Siuenti (씨유엔티) 21:53, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Súper Luchas independent? 

message: So the revert comment was "see talk page", we'll I've seen it and I see no place where you state your interpretation that it needs "2 articles 100% on the championship" since that's actually not what the general notabilty guideline states - it states , so technically it does not even need one source 100% about the championship. If you're going to tag something and revert it when I point out the tag is not appropriate please at least provide a correct justification not just your own personal interpretations. Like I said, plenty of reliable, independent coverage, if you disagree I believe AFD is the correct process to take. MPJ-DK  15:44, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Discuss this at the section WP:N above please. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 15:57, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seen talk page, see no comments on # of "100% coverage articles"