lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lists of mountains in Ireland

message: Added Paul Tempan's list of 100 highest mountains in Ireland (plus his work on placenames etc). Shortened down some of the translations just to make the table more readable (already huge as it stands). Also, need to be clear that the official UIAA mountain definition is 150m in prominence (what Mountainviews uses). There is a lot of "fog" in this article around the 150m issue for some reason. Britishfinance (talk) 11:41, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Realising that I have started re-writing this article.  A key issue is clarifying the importance of prominence (from which all definitions feeds off), and I think the article needs the tables to include the prominence data before finalising the text. Britishfinance (talk) 18:01, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Have added the prominences from MountainView's OSI table and highlighted the Real Munros and P600s.Britishfinance (talk) 10:31, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added a new table 

message: I have marked the three main tables, 100 Highest, Vandeleur-Lynams, and Arderins as downloads from the 2018 MountainViews Online Database.  Note that as prominence is very hard to measure accurately, these tables will be subject to revision in the future.  It is important, however, not to make individual changes to a particular mountain's data on the table (just add the issue as a Note in the notelist, as the source will become contaminated, and the tables will lose their usability.  More important will be to re-download the tables every year or so. Britishfinance (talk) 18:53, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 2018 MountainViews Online Database download
Talk:Winning Women

message: Please do not make unsourced claims about the future - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Also, we should follow the style guide - please put headings in correct format - we only capitalise the first word of a heading (apart from proper nouns, of course). Metamagician3000 10:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I just removed a chart table for an unreleased (!!!) single. Oh for God's sake, it contained even a section for Phillippines single chart!! And again : before being released. That completely fit the WP:Crystal Ball. Remove your barnstars if you don't recognize this. Lajbi Holla @ me 14:09, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hehh. And there's Latvia also. Wait I add Liechteinstein...Lajbi Holla @ me 14:10, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:List of Pani Poni characters

message: I'm not entirely sure that, for parodies, a citation is always available. The fact tag for the reference to Azumanga Daioh, for example, cannot be referenced, since it's a simple parody and the animators will certainly never publish anything explaining the jokes. Should the tags be removed? --Cless Alvein 20:55, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: I was playing Persona 3, and suddenly it hit me, Media's name is a reference to the healing spell of the same name, from the Shin Megami Tensei series. (Why it took me so long to realize, I don't know)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Golden kintaro (talk • contribs) 18:14, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media 

message: Should it mention the fact that when Ichijo appears, there's always a noise like bells shaking, or something. 193.122.137.1 (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ichijo
Talk:Houghton Regis

message: One or several of the dates in the timeline are either wrong or not in order. --Martin de la Iglesia 15:04, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline 

message: Changed reference for Leisure Centre.
No reference that Houghton Regis Action Group had an effect on decision to keep leisure centre open.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.132.193 (talk) 23:44, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern Times 
Talk:Annabelle Whitestone

message: I'm too busy lately to edit this article, but as it develops further from the stub it should note that Annabelle Whitestone is the wife of publisher George Weidenfeld.  There are probably many more references, but here is one article/interview.   — Athænara </font>  ✉  10:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage
Talk:MV Britannic

message: I have recently noticed that their are two pages dedicated to the britannic RMS Britannic (1929) and MV Britannic are both about the same ship and display nearly identical information and i suggest that they should be merged.
58.169.73.221 10:51, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Merged this title to the other.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:45, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of celebrities portrayed in video games

message: This list shouldn't really include sporting personalities (due to the sheer number of sports video games) or where a celebrity is playing a role or voice-over. Marasmusine 10:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not meant to be a list of celebrity acting / voice-over roles, but actual celebrity appearances. So, for example, we don't list Vin Diesel in The Chronicals of Riddick game, because his likeness and voice is being used for a character, not himself. It is a list of "X appeared as him/herself in game Y". Marasmusine 08:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of celebrity appearances in video games

message: This article and List of artists who have portrayed themselves in music games should be merged into a single article, titled something like List of people who have portrayed themselves in video games. There is no reason to separate music games just because they are the most common. And if that alone isn't notable enough, perhaps List of people who have portrayed themselves in media, including film and TV and similar. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:20, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to new article
Talk:Gemini Observatory

message: One of the Google earth place marks for this telescope is placed at East coordinates instead of West (Near Wake Island). Maybe google earth can't handle double coords?
:Seems OK to me. Maury (talk) 02:54, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Earth 

message: Wikimedia and Wikipedia require that photos be available for all uses, including commercial use.
The University of Hawaii system prohibits photos taken within the Mauna Kea Science Area Reserve from being used commercially "or released for commercial use" unless a commercial film/photography permit was acquired before the photos were taken.  In addition, if photos include any observatory buildings, permission for commercial use must be acquired from each observatory shown.
q.v. 
While it is unlikely that the University has the time or interest to do anything about posting of "unauthorized" photos to Wikipedia, this apparently irreconcilable conflict between its policy and that of Wikimedia and Wikipedia is something Wikipedians should be aware of when considering submitting their personal photos of Mauna Kea.
I've worked on Mauna Kea for five years, most of it for the University of Hawaii, so I'm very familiar with their policies.  I've never once gotten a permit for commercial photography, and as a result, I can't submit to Wikipedia "any" of the thousands of photos I have of the observatories.
I will encourage the appropriate people at each observatory to officially make photos available to Wikimedia/Wikipedia.
Hope this helps!
Dan (talk) 13:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A caution to all who would submit personal photos of Mauna Kea 

message: For some reason the fields of view quoted in the section on adaptive optics conflict with those quoted in http://www.gemini.edu/node/10058 Mollwollfumble (talk) 18:40, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Field of View 
Talk:External auditor

message: does any one know of any aspects against external auditors???
::What do you mean by aspects? As in negative aspects? Criticisms? Perceptions? - Mtmelendez (TALK|UB|HOME) 12:28, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Views on external auditors

message: Within the scope of business and economics it would seem that auditing should be afforded at least mid level importance.  All public companies are required to have external auditors and most organizations have some form of internal audit department as well.  Auditing is massive industry, and its impact on financial markets is far-reaching.  With that said, I'm going to change the assessment to mid. Wambear1 (talk) 20:30, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance on the Assessment Scale 

message: I have substantially edited this article, however the section on detection of fraud needs  more content and a new section with recent events  WikiCpa (talk) 17:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of article 
Talk:Johann Gerhard

message: It might be helpful to link to the many works of Gerhard available on Google Books!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.207.7.175 (talk) 15:54, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google Books 
Talk:Slieve Mish Mountains

message: The statement that the rocks of the Slieve Mish Mountains" date from the Upper Devonian period (310–450 million years ago)" is incorrect. This is a 140 Myr time interval, whereas the Upper Devonian period (419 to 393 Ma) was a 26 Myr time interval. The presented 140 Myr time interval stretches across four geological periods: Late Ordovician (458-444 Ma) Silurian (444-419 Ma) Devonian 419-358 Ma) Ma and Carboniferous (which ended in 299 Ma). There are also two contradictions. A) The article states that the rock are from the Upper Devonian but also mentions Ordovician metasediments (i.e., metamorphic rocks derived from sedimentary rocks). B) The article gives a 140 Myr time interval and then states: “During this 60 million year period …”
 
These problems have been resolved in an expansion of the geology section of the article Testatorsilens (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Tararua Range

message: *Are the Orongoronga's part of this mountain chain?Book M 10:56, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Geographically they are, but geographically it's all part of the Southern Main Range that extends through the entire country. The Orongorongas are the part within Rimutaka Forest Park, whereas the Tararuas are usually thought of as the part within Tararua Forest Park. Izogi (talk) 05:53, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added a short history section, mostly talking about The Sutch Search of 1933 although that's only a tiny part of the Tararuas' history.  I included a couple of references, but unfortunately one of them regarding the media coverage of the time is a link to my blog, because I can't find any other suitable references.  I'm hoping it'll be grudgingly accepted under the circumstances because it's mostly an objective reproduction of the newspaper articles and letters to the editor about the event in 1933, but if anyone else knows something that'd fit better, please go ahead and change it! Izogi (talk) 05:56, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Section, including The Sutch Search
Talk:Luton/Dunstable urban area

message: I have removed the prod on this as whilst it is a stub, I think it has the capacity to grow in the future.  Most of these urban areas now have an article, I don't think this should be any different. Regan123 19:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod 
Talk:Reserve (accounting)

message: Articles cover the exact same topic. Jackmcbarn (talk) 18:08, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've redirected that article without merging.  Much of the material was copyvio cut&paste. Kuru (talk) 01:07, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Different Types of Accounting Reserves]]
Talk:Target archery

message: I think the fun variations section should be limited to a very short paragraph and a link to the novelty shoots page. It's ridiculous to have it on the target archery page. I'm a fairly proficient target archer and compete at a state/national level and have shot a novelty event ONCE. it's a very, very minor part of archery and shouldn't be considered target archery.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.46.37 (talk) 11:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

message: dr. sir i m hardeep kumar, archery coach in haryana (india )
 i want indour archery cpmp. date. end rules,
 plz help me, thanx........  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.187.206.225 (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  indour archery comp, date
Talk:History of Luton

message: Start article, this is to be a daughter page from Luton going into more detail of various aspects of Lutons History, in particular, Vauxhall, The Hatting industry amd WW2.
The Luton page will need the history section reducing to key elements. --GazMan7 11:27, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

message: This article is just a cut/paste job from the "History" section of the Luton article. I do not think this is necessary
I agree. . . .LinguisticDemographer 16:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate 
Talk:Steven Tari

message: This article is wrong in many particulars, such as the location and identity of those who arrested him, who the 6000 followers were etc etc, and needs to be cleaned up. Primarily the problem is with a careless interpretation of the newspaper references on which this article is based.
:Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to).   
:Instead of criticizing others. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 16:18, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup - March 2007

message: Please note that "Papuan" does not mean "Papua New Guinean". See Papua. "Papuan", in the context of PNG, usually means "from the Papuan Region".  Steven Tari is from Manus, which is in the Islands Region.  The adjective to use is "Papua New Guinean". Wantok (talk) 04:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Papuan" does not mean "Papua New Guinean" 
Talk:Elusa (Haluza)

message: "The city is called 'Chellous' (Χελλοὺς) in the Greek text of Judith." Very vague, and the wikilink is probably wrong. I guess Greek = Septuagint, and Judith = the Book of Judith. I have modified the wikilinks accordingly, I just hope there's no other meaning to it. Please, do not just copy & paste from academic sources, or consider everyone to be scholars in the field. Thanks. Arminden (talk) 18:29, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Greek text of Judith"? 

message: "In the vicinity, according to the Targums, was the desert of Sur with the well at which the angel found Hagar () (see Revue Biblique, 1906, 597)."
Elusa isn't a biblical site, so how is it identified as being near the desert of Sur/Shur? Genesis, modern geography and archaeology don't mix well. At least explain the deduction, or offer a link to the 1906 (!) source. Arminden (talk) 19:01, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bible (Genesis) and science mishmash
Talk:Chixdiggit! (album)

message: The GC song was covered by a band called Cheeky Monkey (or are they these guys with a different name?) Danceswithzerglings (talk) 23:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gerry Cheevers
Talk:Choirs of the Eye

message: I think the "Musical Approach" section of this article relies a little too heavily upon esoteric comparisons with maudlin of the Well and unsourced commentary; if no one has any objections, I'll rewrite it when I have more time/information/motivation. C1k3 00:07, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical Approach 
Talk:WOW Worship: Yellow

message: I think you haven't put an image for WOW Worship: Yellow and You also haven't put the External link for WOW Worship: Yellow 105.112.28.150 (talk) 14:04, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  WOW Worship: Yellow 

message: I think you haven't put an image for WOW Worship: Yellow and You haven't put the External link as well. 105.112.28.150 (talk) 14:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  WOW Worship: Yellow
Category talk:Arthurian legend

message: I agree entirely with the assessment by User:Cuchullain above, dated 1 February 2008. Four years later, nothing has improved. The number of categories "Arthurian legend" is supposed to belong to is simply ridiculous. 
----
 Category:Anglo-Norman folklore
 Category:Anglo-Norman literature
 Category:Breton mythology and folklore
 Category:British folklore
 Category:British literature
 Category:British traditional history
 Category:Celtic Britain
 Category:Celtic mythology
 Category:Cornish culture
 Category:Cornish folklore
 Category:English folklore
 Category:English literature
 Category:French folklore
 Category:Middle English literature
 Category:Mythological kings
 Category:Scottish folklore
 Category:Sub-Roman Britain
 Category:Welsh folklore
 Category:Welsh mythology
 Category:England in fiction
 Category:Scotland in fiction
 Category:Wales in fiction
----
It would suffice to put it in "British traditional history". This is exactly what it is, but no, it must also be made explicit that this is, among other things, not just a topic of Cornish folklore, no, but also of Cornish culture, and not just of Welsh flolklore and of Welsh mythology, but also of Wales in fiction. And let's not forget Scotland in fiction, I don't know where that comes in, but in 300 years of chivalric romances, I am sure some character at some points sets foot in Scotland, so there you are, put it in the category (never mind that historically, there wasn't even a "Scotland" in the Arthurian period any more than there was an "England", these tales being set before the migration of either the Anglo-Saxons or the Gaels to Great Britain).  
If all topics on Wikipedia would be treated as redundantly as this, our categorization system would break down completely into an unusable mess. --dab (𒁳) 14:46, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Category overkill
Talk:Cuckoo (album)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Sweetest Pie (song) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 16#Sweetest Pie (song) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  — GhostRiver 19:59, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sweetest Pie (song)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:D.Gray-man Original Soundtrack 1

message: The arguments for this pages deletion were that it fails Wikipedia: Music, however wikipedia music states itself, if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability to have individual articles on Wikipedia. and as such the album was created by Kaoru Wada who is obviously notable as they have their own article, this article should be recreated, and next time, before you delete an article leave it up for discussion, just for a little while, Okay? Kuro Woof 03:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: May have does not equal does have. This soundtrack has notability apart from the anime series and has been properly merged back to its main article just like many other anime soundtracks. And, FYI, Kaoru is not necessarily notable either, just because they have their own articles. Their notability has just not been questioned. AnmaFinotera (talk) 03:43, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Darn, thwarted again by the AnmaFinotera and her accursed ways of Wikipedia....Kuro Woof 03:47, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Protest of Deletion
Talk:Your Arms Too Short to Box with God

message: I want to question whether the legacy section is scholarly enough for Wikipedia. Perhaps most of this type of info belongs on a wiki site that is about hip-hop instead of on Wikipedia. Something like RapGenious but slightly different. I'm not sure. Thoughts?  --Vaxine19 (talk) 20:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK to keep it on Wikipedia, but it seems to stand out currently because the article is quite short overall.  —DIV (120.17.227.117 (talk) 13:45, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy Section 

message: Non-standard grammar.  
—DIV (120.17.227.117 (talk) 13:46, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar
Talk:Dangerous Age

message: Hey!
Just wanting to know if I can add the genre "glam metal" to this album?
Explicitly stated as being a part of this genre on page 154 of "Popoff, M. The Big Book of Hair Metal".
Thanks! AgentKozak (talk) 18:45, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Glam metal as a genre to this album
Talk:Die, Die My Darling

message: Do it.  Nothing pertinent on Metallica only page, more interesting info is here a la Astronomy. Thedarxide (talk) 19:19, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm tempted to suggest WP:SOFIXIT, but I think the proper protocol here would be to go through the Proposed Merger steps to merge the Metallica article into this one.  By the way, I agree that the Metallica stub could be merged here because there is nothing extraordinarily notable about the Metallica version.  We just need to make sure that the ultimate product of this merger gives equal weight to 1) the song 2) the Misfits single and 3) the Metallica cover. Wilhelm_meis (talk) 13:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There's been a merge tag on Die, Die My Darling (Metallica song) for a year, but no discussion has come out of it. I think at this point it's safe to be bold and just do it, especially since there's precedent for it for the other Garage Inc. covers that were released as singles. See Turn the Page (Bob Seger song) and Whiskey in the Jar. --IllaZilla (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I've gone ahead & done it. --IllaZilla (talk) 21:06, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me. Thanks IllaZilla.  Wilhelm_meis (talk) 05:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Agreement on the Conservation of African-Eurasian Migratory Waterbirds

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.ekoi.lt/info/wowlt/aewa.htm and http://www.unep-aewa.org/about/background.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 18:34, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Ramsar Convention

message: I think this article is overcategorized, it has a main category, :Category:Ramsar Convention, and even so it's directly included inside 198 other categories! --UAwiki (talk) 09:19, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: this is because its an international treaty, and each signatory has a category. the only way to reduce the categories is to subdivide treaties by topic or year or other criteria in addition to by nation (ie: environmental treaties signed by the US). i dont see that happening, so we are stuck with an article smaller than its categories!(mercurywoodrose)50.193.19.66 (talk) 17:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overcategorization 