lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Amped 2

message: I know it might be hard, but could someone put the soundtrack list of songs. I don't have the game, but would like to know.--Granpire Viking Man 22:10, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soundtrack 

message: This is a personal template to provide advice in the course of completing a content assessment or reassessment for the WikiProject for video games. It's not a part of the project itself. For formal guidance when creating and editing articles under this project, please consult the project’s content assessment guide and manual of style. The template can be found here.
Category                	Flag	Comments
Overall                 	    	The article contains meaningful content about the subject matter, and is supported by some citations and multiple sections, but falls short in form and content under the manual of style.
Layout                  	    	The article does not have a layout with sections that meet the manual of style.
Lead section            	    	The article's lead section does not conform to the manual of style, such as lacking a concise summary of facts such as the year, developer, producer, genre and/or format.
Infobox                 	    	The article contains an appropriate infobox.
Gameplay                	    	The article contains an accessible description of gameplay that minimizes jargon and avoids excessive trivial details.
Screenshot and cover art	    	The article does not contain both a screenshot and cover art for the game.
Plot                    	N/A 	N/A
Development             	    	The article does not contain a development section, where one may or may not be useful depending on the availability of reliable sources.
Reception               	    	The article's reception section has issues, such as insufficient content, clutter in the section, overuse of direct quotations, undue weight or trivia.
Sources                 	    	The article contains reliable sources, but the article's content is not well cited, is heavy on primary sources, or the sources are inconsistently or incorrectly cited.
 ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 11:59, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:VG Article reassessment (20 September 2023)
Talk:Amped 3

message: What else needs to be done? Tbone762 12:14, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the tag from the main page, though I won't change the assessment as I'm not sure if that's over-stepping my boundaries. xenocidic (talk) 21:42, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's still a stub. Someone needs to attempt to explain the plot.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.17.235.81 (talk) 02:36, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Still a stub?
Talk:Amped: Freestyle Snowboarding

message: This is a personal template to provide advice in the course of completing a content assessment or reassessment for the WikiProject for video games. It's not a part of the project itself. For formal guidance when creating and editing articles under this project, please consult the project’s content assessment guide and manual of style. The template can be found here.
Category                	Flag	Comments
Overall                 	    	The article contains meaningful content about the subject matter, and is supported by some citations and multiple sections, but falls short in form and content under the manual of style.
Layout                  	    	The article does not have a layout with sections that meet the manual of style.
Lead section            	    	The article's lead section does not conform to the manual of style, such as lacking a concise summary of facts such as the year, developer, producer, genre and/or format.
Infobox                 	    	The article contains an appropriate infobox.
Gameplay                	    	The article contains a description of gameplay, but is either insufficient to cover a clear description of the game or has excessive or trivial details.
Screenshot and cover art	    	The article does not contain both a screenshot and cover art for the game.
Plot                    	N/A 	N/A
Development             	    	The article does not contain a development section, where one may or may not be useful depending on the availability of reliable sources.
Reception               	    	The article's reception section has issues, such as insufficient content, clutter in the section, overuse of direct quotations, undue weight or trivia. The article may also benefit from a review aggregator score and ratings template if appropriate.
Sources                 	    	The article contains reliable sources, but the article's content is not well cited, is heavy on primary sources, or the sources are inconsistently or incorrectly cited.
 ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 12:09, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:VG Article reassessment (20 September 2023)
Talk:Amplitude (2003 video game)

message: Does anyone know why the article is Amplitude (game) rather than Amplitude (video game)? I thought the latter was usually preferred. Pele Merengue 23:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Just dropping a comment that I may take a stab at updating the page to incorporate more information about the PS3/PS4 sequel. I'm just pondering if it should be a separate page or an extension of this one. It is definitely a different yet similar game and more of a sequel than a remake... Hmm... Any thoughts? BcRIPster (talk) 02:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  More information about PS3/PS4 sequel? 
Talk:Anno 1503

message: Hi! Does somebody know what the record of citizens is? I have on my Islands over 40000 and I make always above 10000 profit. Is this good? We can collect statistics! :D Dagadt
not sure that anyone keeps records, few people play this game which is unfourtanate, how did you manage that anyways?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.220.135.126 (talk) 22:10, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record
Talk:Archer Maclean's Mercury

message: The article currently compares Mercury to Marble Madness. Is this really accurate? In Marble Madness, you control the marble directly. In this game, you control the mercury blobs indirectly by tilting the playfield, thus making the gameplay far more similar to the old mechanical "Marble Maze" game. Clayhalliwell (talk) 17:42, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Over a decade late, but yes, the specific reference to the tilting playfield makes it clear that whichever editor added the Marble Madness mentions had Marble Madness confused with the mechanical marble maze game. Removing. Martin IIIa (talk) 21:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Marble Madness?

message: According to Mobygames.com  (a source often cited in Wikipedia), a PS3 version was released "13 Jul 2009". Can anyone confirm this?--217.232.221.204 (talk) 18:17, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. I think they got it wrong: it was released on PSN, but not for PS3. See --217.232.221.204 (talk) 18:25, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  PS3 version? 

message: I noticed that one of the cited sources has a 404. I crawled around the web archive and found this https://web.archive.org/web/20140715084841/http://archive.news10.net/entertainment/gameguys/article/159423/99/Mercury-Hg-now-available-for-PSN-and-XBLA-DLC-coming is this the missing source?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.78.53.187 (talk) 19:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found citation archive
Talk:Area 51 (1995 video game)

message: I Figured that at least the Kronn hunter mode would be on here. I don't have an account so if you want to post it and don't know how, well here I am. 
At the beginning of the game, ONLY shoot the first three STAAR team members you see. If you did this right you'll enter Kronn Hunter mode.
In this mode, you are a mercenary from the Kronn hierarchy sent to sterilize Area 51 of the Kronn rebels. You will notice that the grenades, bullets, shotgun shells, and machine gun bullets have all taken on a Kronn form. You will also gain 20,000 extra points whenever your score is tallied, and you can shoot STAAR team members with impunity.
http://cheats.ign.com/ob2/068/008/008413.html
Thats to back my statement up. I don't see Kronn hunter mode as a cheat but more of a different way to play. Its the only preferred way My Fellow droogs and I play. Oh the great summers we had switching off between Area 51 and Marvel Vs. Capcom 2 in the Saraha Arcade in Las Vegas —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.243.215.14 (talk) 03:49, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kronn HUNTER Mode 

message: Albeit it's a separate game, but is there any reason to add mention to the "Area 51-Maximum Force" cabinet that was also released later in this article?  Or quite possibly a parent link to an article relating to that? 68.32.15.157 (talk) 01:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-release in Arcade 

message: "cost of developing Area 51 was $2,500" this is absurdly low and most likely not correct.  Does anyone have the correct value (and reference)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.208.159.19 (talk) 16:13, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development Cost Unrealistic 

message: At the date of release the Atari arcade branch was already sold to Time Warner. 178.82.174.42 (talk) 11:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "released by Atari" is wrong
Talk:Armored Core: Formula Front

message: I have added the No More Links Template in an effort to quell the ongoing linkspam that this and related pages have been experiencing. Please see the Links to be Avoided page to learn what it is inappropriate to link to. 
Further addition of links without consensus in the talk page will be treated as spam and will be removed. Ninety (talk) 18:41, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 
Talk:Armored Core: Last Raven

message: --I Need Sleepy... 17:48, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Column 

message: How can you tell that it was Evangel piloting the pulverizer in the Alliance ending? Bobman110 03:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alliance Ending 

message: I have added the No More Links Template in an effort to quell the ongoing linkspam that this and related pages have been experiencing. Please see the Links to be Avoided page to learn what it is inappropriate to link to. 
Further addition of links without consensus in the talk page will be treated as spam and will be removed. Ninety (talk) 18:46, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links 

message: the article states that, armored core : last raven, is the first game in the series to have in game humans.
i remember running into tiny humans armed with jetpacks and rocket launchers in armored core nexus  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.83.124.21 (talk) 15:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First time Humans? 
Talk:Armored Core: Nine Breaker

message: I have added the No More Links Template in an effort to quell the ongoing linkspam that this and related pages have been experiencing. Please see the Links to be Avoided page to learn what it is inappropriate to link to. 
Further addition of links without consensus in the talk page will be treated as spam and will be removed. Ninety (talk) 18:40, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links
Talk:Trial of the Talmud

message: Is this related to Nahmanides' disputation at Barcelona in 1263? Jon513 10:17, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

message: This poor article (Trial of the Talmud) largely reflects the information in the much better article Disputation of Paris, but in less Wiki-like format, without sections, citations or wikilinks.  Seems to me a merge is called for....  --Eliyahu S Talk 19:19, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. I made a redirect to it. Thus the text is saved. Anyone, who thinks the Paris-article needs some additions from this article, can search in the old version for something useful. Jeff5102 (talk) 16:03, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Disputation of Paris]]?
Talk:Arthur's Knights

message: Where was this game really developed? According to the category of this article, it was developed in Canada, but the French article claims it was developed in France… so my question is where it was really done? Canada? France? or both?
Note that I ask this question for both Arthur’s Knights: Tales of Chivalry and Arthur’s Knights II: The Secret of Merlin.
— MetalGearLiquid  [chat] 20:53, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country of development 
Talk:Assault (1988 video game)

message: So in the legacy section it says that Assault was an influence for Grobda even though Grobda came out in 1984 and Assault came out in 1988. Can someone explain? Ludexteria (talk) 19:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no clue, but if those dates are accurate I'd delete it unless the citations can make it more clear. Leitmotiv (talk) 06:56, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've come to the conclusion that it probably means that Assault and Grobda influenced Granada, a 1990 game and not Assault influenced Granada and Grobda. Ludexteria (talk) 17:17, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This sentence makes no sense
Talk:Astal

message: # https://www.nintendolife.com/news/2021/11/random-a-rather-angry-mario-is-hiding-in-this-sega-saturn-game-from-1995
# http://www.hardcoregaming101.net/astal/
# https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/Lani-Minella/
# https://www.sega-16.com/2018/06/astal/
# Next Gen Mag - August 1995 - pg 31 - July 1995 initial release date.
# https://retrocdn.net/images/e/e7/SegaVisions_US_25.pdf 18-19
# https://www.ign.com/articles/2009/02/02/what-hath-sonic-wrought-vol-10
# https://web.archive.org/web/20051216151704/http://www.classicgaming.com/saturn/magazine/games/astal/ss_games_astal.shtml
#  Edge May 1995 page 29
#  Edge  July 1995 page 65 
# Computer & Video Games, July 1995, pg 26
# https://www.ign.com/articles/2008/07/29/top-10-sega-saturn-games
Sergecross73 msg me 23:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Asterix & Obelix XXL

message: When I first looked at this article, there was hardly any info about plot! ISmellDonuts (talk) 18:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No info?
Talk:Cydonia

message: This page should be a simple redirect to Kydonia, the ancient city in Greece, for which a huge corpus of data and in-links exist. The other items should be disambiguated by a new page: Cydonia (disambiguation). A hatnote atop the Kydonia page will direct users to the disambig page. Any comments ....please make here. Cheers. Cewvero (talk) 03:59, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly I don't feel like turning the current disambig page into a redirect to Kydonia. I'm not so sure that everyone looking for "Cydonia" on Wikipedia is looking for info on the Greek city: the first thing I think of when someone mentions "Cydonia" is the Mars region, so I think keeping the current disambig is somewhat better. In any event, if we decide to keep the disambig I think we should also clean it up a bit. Berserker79 (talk) 09:31, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur with Berserker.  I typed "Cydonia" into the search bar looking for the genus, not the city.  There doesn't seem to be sufficient evidence that the city is the primary target. As for the cleanup, I just finished reformatting according to WP:MOSDAB. Neelix (talk) 15:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

text: was (kinda) right and the other two just entirely mistaken. "Kydonia" was a mistake and the ancient Greek city should be parked at some version of Cydonia. Even so, the region of Mars is now the clear  and this dab should be moved to Cydonia (disambiguation). I'd take care of it myself but it's currently blocked and needs admin help. — LlywelynII 05:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Preponderant name
Talk:18 Levels of Hell

message: None of these chambers seem to get any Google hits beyond this page and its mirrors.  They all seem to have been added by one editor and have been barely edited since then.  Can someone verify that these are from actual mythology, and if so, can they identify some of the specific myths and writings they're mentioned in so we can note them in the article?  --Aquillion 02:17, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification.
Talk:Atari Anthology

message: Had to remove the above ref during maintenance. Leaving here for future use. - X201 (talk) 12:00, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref 
Talk:Atelier Iris 2: The Azoth of Destiny

message: Is the Iris in Azoth of Destiny really the younger version of the Iris from Eternal Mana? --Covenant Elite 07:46, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iris 

message: This game is special, it is different, it has a Japanese voice option. ;) Which allows you to listen to the original Japanese voice talent (not many games include such an option and it was a big reason for me getting the game, thought some other people might appreciate the info).  Anyone who edits this article and likes the idea, chuck in an internal link to the Japanese voice option video games article and a sentence or so confirming the availability of such an option. I looked through the Atelier 2 article myself but couldn't seem to find an easy way of slipping in the info...--Axiszen (talk) 00:25, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese voice option 
Talk:Awesome Possum... Kicks Dr. Machino's Butt

message: Please ignore my edit. One of my students did it. -FShelton
I just think it should be in a trivia or something, the protagonist looks nothing nothing like a possum (or opossum, for tht matter), looking more like a coati, a cacomistle etc. Funny thing that for a game that preaches nature conservation, environment etc they did little to no research of one of the most common urban animals in the Americas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.205.153.72 (talk) 06:59, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nude mouse

message: "A nude mouse is generally more expensive than an ordinary laboratory mouse, so extra care must be taken while handling Nude Mice." 
Stumbled on this page. It seems to me that the same level of "care" should be extended to Nude as well as non nude mice. therefore Im editing this to simply read "A nude mouse is generally more expensive than an ordinary laboratory mouse." I hope you follow me  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.206.233.200 (talk) 19:21, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A

message: Hi.  I came to this page via the Community Portal.  I found a couple of possible references that could be used for this article, but I'm sure there are higher-quality ones out there somewhere. — MSchmahl… 10:23, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible references 

message: Mice do not have an autosomal "chromosome 21", they only have 19 chromosomes.  Also, I've never heard of a TGF-7 (transforming growth factor?) this point needs more clarity.--199.76.182.68 22:47, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question 

message: I removed the line about discovery at Rachill in the 60s because nude mice seem to have been in use before that. John Duncan 11:14, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discovery 

message: I changed "Foxn1", which is the protein, to "FOXN1", which is the gene.John Duncan 11:16, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gene Nomenclature 
Talk:Royton

message: Hello, I've just removed football manager Les Chapman from the Notable people section, owing the lack of a reference. If one can be found, please feel free to restore this with citation. --Jza84 |  Talk   12:31, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Les Chapman 

message: This article has undergone a GA review and has passed. Best, epicAdam (talk) 18:09, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Pass 

message: Just a nudge that Royton appears in this article from 2002. I'm not sure if it has any relevance or use. --Jza84 |  Talk   11:19, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Back Track

message: I just deleted a whole lot of random and stupid writing in this page. Feel free to reedit it but for now it has nothing to do with the article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.189.212.233 (talk) 21:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: I've got the cover for the game, but we need some non-watermarked pictures. Let's get this out of the stub-class! mattiator (talk) 16:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assistance required 

message: JimmyBlackwing, I found another one that mentions reviews, but does not cite them. 2600:1700:E820:1BA0:F547:54CF:BB57:887D (talk) 03:20, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced reception
Talk:Backyard Baseball

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calibre13 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

message: There should be a note that these powerups are only for a specific year of the game.  Other versions (2004, for example) have several different power-ups.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.148.42.30 (talk) 02:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Power-Ups

message: I believe in the power-up section that the power-up should separated by years. When looking at the past years the game was made there are some new and different power-ups for batting and pitching. I would like to organize the section like so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Target2280 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power-ups 

message: In the 3rd paragraph the first three words in the sentence says, "In these games." Where that can make sense I believe that change should say, "In Backyard Baseball." Calibre13 (talk) 17:01, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording 

message: According to the MobyGames website, the GameCube version of BYB 2005 was released on April 2, 2003, the PS2 version was released on March 23, 2004, and the PC version was released on June 22, 2004. 74.132.203.31 (talk) 15:00, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backyard Baseball 2005 Release Dates 

message: Sandlot Sluggers needs its own page; it has its own plot in story mode, minigames, and level system. 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:F5D6:1DE2:482E:52FE (talk) 15:21, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sandlot Sluggers
Talk:Backyard Football

message: Don't just post on the page, "please type how to unlock this character here."  It looks sloppy.  I don't have that version, so I can't update it.  In the future post something like that in the discussion page.  (Tails512 (talk) 14:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to Unlock 

message: Just to clarify, the game that was planned for Game Boy Color, but cancelled was not a version of Backyard Football 2002. It was called Backyard Football 2001 and would have been released in October of 2000. https://web.archive.org/web/20000620230804/http://humongous.com:80/ 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:80ED:9672:CB0F:C58C (talk) 20:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancelled GameBoy Color Game 

message: We need descriptions for Backyard Football 2004 and 2006. Simply listing them as further adaptions in Backyard Football 2002's description is very unnecessary. 2603:6010:8B45:FA00:405D:4656:A093:551A (talk) 17:41, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backyard Football 2004 and 2006
Talk:Bad Boys: Miami Takedown

message: Is this section a joke? "Pixels"? "Ability to shoot and reload when prompted"? "Game is already built"? What the crap? 63.3.0.129 20:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Features" 

message: In the UK Version, it is called Bad Boys 2, exacly like the movie. I dunno about the US: Miami Takedown. But I think the Miami is in cell shaded. While the UK one is full 3d.
I will try and fix up this cheap article:/
:>x<ino 08:12, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miami Takedown/ 2 

message: The whole thing is incomprehensible and incoherent.  It almost seems that it would be better to pull the section for now until someone familiar with the game can rewrite it in a coherent, sensible fashion.  --BrokenSphere 22:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot rewrite