lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cillian Murphy

message: The 2011-2023 section should be renamed since it currently includes 2024 event.  Perhaps "2011-present"? --136.54.106.120 (talk) 02:11, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section title 

message: Hi there - it looks like "Guillermo del Toro's Cabinet of Curiosities" episode 'Lot 36' was inaccurately added to Cillian's Television list of credits. I finished watching the episode, and he did not appear in it. After double checking on his IMDb page, it is also not listed there as a credit for crew or cast, including the character of "Antonio," which is what is stated on his Wikipedia page.
Is there a way this can be removed, as it is misleading? Rattlingthestars (talk) 04:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guillermo del Toro's Cabinet of Curiosities  

message: This source on the article says Murphy was a vegetarian for 15 years but went back to eating meat in 2017 . However, if you read his own interviews he always stated he ate fish. For example in this 2014 interview he said "Tokyo was pretty amazing. I'd only ever seen it in movies and read about it in books. I must have eaten my own body weight in raw fish while I was there and I thought the energy was incredible. It really had an effect on me" . Fish is not vegetarian.
In this interview he states he was vegetarian for 12 years but gave it up after eating venison . The 15 year vegetarian claim is obviously inaccurate. I believe the article should be updated. Psychologist Guy (talk) 23:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: He's quoted as stating he was vegetarian, so that's not for removal. If he also stated that he ate fish while being vegetarian, you can add it to the article with a reliable source. Lapadite (talk) 01:41, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Not vegetarian for 15 years
Talk:Iftikhar Ali Khan Pataudi

message: Not sure the best way of correcting it, however the Infobox suggests he is English... He was actualy from India although he representeb both England and India at an international level. Whats the best way of changing this (as the infobox formatting really messes with my formating) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheRack (talk • contribs) 03:58, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  English/India 

message: Why does the 238 have an asterisk? I don't know much about cricket. --AW (talk) 03:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone? --AW (talk) 16:31, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asterisk 

message: * 1929 image at National Portrait Gallery --Ekabhishek (talk) 09:12, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image
Talk:Iftikhar Ali Khan

message: Hi Natalina,
ALL the info present on this page is also present in the page that you are now redirected to; I have formatted the page better and added personal details with reference links, so that the nawab's bio is not restricted to this cricketing career alone. Please see the point in this and do not revert. 
Importantly, the NAME of the page should include the SURNAME "Pataudi" so as not to confuse with other people who have the name "Iftekhar Ali Khan". Believe me, that is not such an uncommon set of first names in the muslim community.
Thanx
Anon
Btw, it should be Ift*i*khar everywhere Tintin 10:31, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Clay Aiken/Archive 1

message: I put the allegations about Clay possibly being gay back into the article.  I'm not saying for once minute that Clay is gay or straight.  I simply think this is such an obvious statement that most people would expect to see in this article.  Fair or not, Clay is probably the one artist today whose sexuality is called into question more than any other celebrity.  When people say that Clay is gay these are only allegations and that's what this article says such statements are...only allegations.  The sentence does not say that Clay "is" gay or that Clay is "rumoured to be" gay...it just says that many people have made allegations towards Mr. Aiken. So many have raised questions about Clay that it is impossible to deny the debate.  Also, by being located at the end of the article, this sentence couldn't be any more out of the way and unobtrusive.  - MatthewUND
I know Clay's popular, but do we really need all the fansite links? Wikipedia is not a link repository. I have limited Internet access, so I can't check the sites out and see which ones are worthy, but I think the number of fansite links on this page is ridiculous. Hermione1980 00:35, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a vocal segment of fans who speculate that Clay is gay, but he has denied such allegations said he is not.
I personally think it's unlikely that he is gay, but the fact is, the allegations speculations have been made—repeatedly—and one tiny sentence at the bottom of the article is needed to acknowledge this. The sentence is NPOV, states the issue clearly and concisely, and I really believe it needs to stay. Hermione1980 14:03, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he or isn't he 
Talk:Santiago del Estero

message: The Fact that we had a cold winter this year doesn't mean this is constant . The winter could be Rendered as a climate change.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.117.197.176 (talk) 20:46, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Yeah, it doesn't

message: Exactly, he is no longer the mayor  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MXER (talk • contribs) 03:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  julio alegre is no longer the mayor 

message: I found an error in the bond of Santiago del Estero, because when trying to enter the Spanish Wikipedia page, does not appear Santiago del Estero, but Mercedes Aragonés de Juárez, ex-governor of the province of Santiago del Estero. 
Sincerely,
--Arivera92 (talk) 01:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error on the link in Spanish Santiago del Estero
Talk:Bowyangs

message: This article has been kept following this VFD debate. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:57, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Um. Do any of these people read their Wikipedia entries before they hit that "Publish" button? 
I shower when I go to the gym, but if I don't then I doubt that I bathe once a week. And I doubt that I'm the sort of freak this article suggests I am...
 
David Lloyd-Jones (talk) 02:27, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  They Only Bathed Once A Week! So, uh, obviously that accounts for their desperate need for bowyangs?
Talk:Carter the Unstoppable Sex Machine

message: I'm pretty sure I remember reading an interview with them, back in the day, where they claimed to have named themselves after a headline in a local paper. Did my memory make this up? Did they make this up? Was it a real story? Anybody...? ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:23, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name 

message: When you're not logged in and add this group's name anywhere on Wikipedia a vandalism filter will alert moderators that you're vandalizing because you're adding the word s*x. It's puritanism, but as an anonymous user you're not allowed to claim any right on Wikipedia. So don't add this group's name containing the s*x-word anywhere on Wikipedia or you're gonna get punished for quoting a real name. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 20:40, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'm an administrator and I can ensure you you are not going to get punished for using in context the name Carter the Unstoppable Sex Machine. Wikipedia isn't puritanical nor is it censored - I've helped promote two articles (1, 2) with the word "fuck" in the title to Featured Article status, for goodness sake! The filters are there just to prevent vandalism, which destroys content and wastes time. --kingboyk (talk) 03:06, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning
Talk:Hate mail

message: I'm going to go ahead and delete this part -- and leave the dubious claim. My apologies if anyone feels the need to revert. Chris 16:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contains a rather dubious claim... 

message: Due to User:213.37.6.65's concerns regarding my deletions, I've tagged the better part of the article with . The tagged items are either in need of sources, vague and unnecessary, or both. I plan to leave the tags up for 48 hours, then remove what hasn't been fixed en masse. Deltabeignet 02:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: deletions 

message: This article needs elaboration and bringing up to date. Zezen (talk) 12:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too short 

message: "The text of hate mail often contains profanity, or it may simply contain a negative, misappropriating message."
The word "misappropriating" makes no sense in this sentence, but I didn't correct it because I don't know what word was intended. If no one else wants to correct it, I'll come back and delete it. Whaledancer (talk) 17:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  To misappropriate means to steal
Talk:Human genome

message: We don't know the exact number of genes in the human genome. There are at least 19,000 protein-coding genes and no more than 20,000. The number of noncoding genes is all over the map. There are only a few thousand (at most!) that have been confirmed as real genes but there are many more transcribed regions that some scientists call genes even though they have not been shown to have a function. This is a problem since the definition of a gene requires that it produce a FUNCTIONAL product.  
The number of noncoding genes predicted by Ensembl is down to 25,967 in the latest annotation (CRCh38.13) but most of those are stretches of DNA that produce lncRNAs that have not been shown to have a function. 
The issue was raised last year (see Noncoding DNA above) but not resolved. We need to present a consistent view of the number of genes in this article and we need to point out the controversy over the number of noncoding genes. Genome42 (talk) 14:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of genes 

message: The data in the large table on individual chromosomes is ten years old. Not only does it contain outdated information and unfounded speculation but it's also far too complicated and specific for a Wikipedia article. 
I think we should remove it. What do others think? Genome42 (talk) 14:49, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chromosome table 

message: 3,054,815,472 base pairs? The box claims 3,117,275,501. Neither are, of course, right (or maybe both are). Why not give a little credit to the readers and presume that they can handle a bit of complexity? Like saying the number of base pairs is determined using a specific individual's dna (or a group of specific individuals). Why not mention that while we're a diploid species, as far as known we all contain tetraploid and octaploid cells? (This is true, I'm guessing, after a number of cell divisions in the embryo.) Why not say the reference dna is normally selected to be typical and avoids individuals with known aneuploidy, euploidy (except as mentioned), and sex chromosome (rare) variations. In counting the base pairs, there are errors, and any two (independent) researchers are NOT likely to come up with the same exact number, even if the same reference dna is used? Why not say that doing a complete genome is very, very difficult? (I'm not sure that it's ever been fully done ("fully" means counting all base pairs in one lab, by one group of researchers). Also, why not mention that even a reference person will have a number of mutations in their cells (those with nuclei) so that even "their" genome doesn't fully describe their "complete set"?98.21.208.178 (talk) 07:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to fix this and started the reorganization that I suggested in July 2023. Genome42 (talk) 23:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  3,054,815,472
Talk:Aquaman

message: I just wanted to bring up the Aqua Man that was a Robot Master of Mega Man 8, and how he shares the same name with this hero.  --DBoyWheeler.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2E42:8150:AC5F:E61A:9C1A:5982 (talk) 14:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mega Man 8 Aqua Man

message: the articled currently states "These Showcase issues are notable as Aquaman's first cover appearances in any comic."
this is not quite right. Showcase 33 was Jan/Feb 1961  ... but Brave and the Bold 28 (first Justice League) was Feb/Mar 1960, and Aquaman is on the cover of that one. I suspect the sentence is trying to say first solo cover appearance, or first cover appearance promoting his own series, but it should be reworded if thats the case.
J Edward Malone (talk) 01:46, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  first cover appearance
Talk:Battle of Bordeaux (1938 FIFA World Cup)

message: The article says:  "It was the first time that three players were sent off in a World Cup match, a record that was only equaled until the 2006 World Cup match between Portugal and Netherlands." 
However, in the article Battle of Berne, it is claimed tht three players were sent off in that game, which took place in 1954, obviously predating the Por/Holland match. Which 1 is incorrect?
Luke-Samual Ezekiel Cullen 17:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate? 

message: Matthew Bennett The Hutchinson Dictionary of Ancient & Medieval Warfare 1579581161 1998 p319  "In 732 a large army (70,000-80,000) led by Abd ar-Rahman defeated the Aquitainians under Duke Eudo at the Battle of Bordeaux" In ictu oculi (talk) 03:24, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Battle of Bordeaux (732)]]

message: Arthur Machado and Jan Říha were sent off in the 45th minute, and, less importantly Zezé Procópio was sent off in the 10th minute. Martim Silveira was not sent off at all. Besides the  book Glanville, Brian: "The History of the World Cup", Faber and Faber, London. p. 38, there are a myriad of contemporary sources, Such as Sport-Tagblatt, Vienna, 13/05/1938, p.1, Jornal dos Sports, RJ, 13/05/1938, p.1, etc. The FIFA record is definitely wrong here. Also, the name of the Brazilian coach has to be adjusted to Adhemar Pimenta. The templates have to be adjusted accordingly. Cheers, Oalexander (talk) 05:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to WP:BEBOLD and make the edits yourself, citing the appropriate references. GiantSnowman 06:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @Giant: I am as bold as they come in this parish. When you click on the Edit link to the line-ups all you get to see there is a couple templates which don't seem to be accessible to mere mortals like humble me. Thus I kindly request your expert intervention. Cheers, Oalexander (talk) 02:58, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expulsions
Talk:Battle of Bramall Lane

message: I understand that this game was abandoned based on a defined FIFA guideline that a game shouldn't continue when a team is reduced to fewer that 7 men. Is this the only match that this has ever happened in at a professional level? If so, this is worthy of note. If not, perhaps others might be mentioned? - 81.100.216.53 23:37, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it is not the only game that ended because one team was reduced to less than 7 players. The 1981 Copa Libertadores First Place Playoff match between Flamengo and Atlético Mineiro, played on August 21 of that year, also ended in this way (Atlético was reduced to only 6 players). See this [link]. Regards, Carioca 02:19, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Either way, the seven-man FIFA guideline should be mentioned in the text; as it stands it looks as though Eddie Wolstenholme made a purely subjective decision to abandon the match. Loganberry (Talk) 16:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: FIFA guideline

message: The article states that the ref in this particular game failed to book a single WBA player, I haven't seen the game but if there was a "mass brawl" it would be highly unusual for no WBA player to be shown a yellow card. Was there any history of bad blood between Wolstenholme and Shef Utd? I am not implying that there is anything underhand going on but it just seems a little surprising 194.202.65.164 07:45, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not aware of any bad blood. It may have been highly unusual, but unless any further evidence can be found related to this, we can't speculate on Wolstenholme's possible motives, only state the facts. --Jameboy 11:30, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Refereeing Bias?

message: Soccerbase disagrees with the statement that Robert Ullathorne was ruled out for the rest of the season and has him playing in 3 more games
http://www.soccerbase.com/players_details.sd?playerid=8089
I can't link directly to the season since the webpage must use Java or PHP but just search for 2001/02 season and it has him playing three games after this fixture.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.1.52.176 (talk) 18:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ullathorne ruled out for rest of season? 

message: Is there any reason to display the scoreline as "A" : "A" for the sides when for all intents and purposes West Brom won the match 3-0 (as awarded by the FA and as the basis for calculating the 'win' for points). I understand that this was a special match, but highlighting it in the infobox is just cruft to appeal to individual idiosyncracies and not useful to the average reader. Colipon+(Talk) 18:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scoreline A:A
Talk:Kuressaare

message: I find it weird that the article states town has a Russian name Kingissepa. This was the name of the town both in Estonian and Russian during Soviet era, but there is no Russian-language related etymology of this name. This is no more than a surname of an Estonian communist, afther whom the town was renamed. I would suggest the Russian name removed at all.Avellano (talk) 06:45, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: On a similar subject, why is the Finnish name of the city in the opening sentence?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.191.197.232 (talk) 11:15, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian name Kingissepa
Talk:Tap (valve)

message: The caption on the first picture is wrong but I do not know how to change it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.15.169 (talk) 08:32, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: wrong caption

message: http://www.plumbersurplus.com/videos/Faucet-and-Finish-Comparison-Buying-Guide/7
Above is a neat video describing faucet finishes and a comparison of the most common finishes. --216.70.141.161 17:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faucet and Finish Comparison Video 

message: Bibcock gets routed to this page, but the only mention of bibcock is "Most U.S. jurisdictions now require bibcocks to have a vacuum breaker or backflow preventer,..." It's not clear whether a bibcock is the same as a tap/whether such US jurisdictions require this for all taps. Wakablogger2 (talk) 23:15, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I also redirected "Drain cock" here, but there's is no real information - in particular I wanted to know the difference between a "type A" and "type B".  Guess I can ask at the reference desk. Rich Farmbrough, 15:58, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibcocks and drain cocks? 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Tap.png shows a (slightly too steep) left-handed crew. It should be left-right mirrored to inverse it. --Helium4 (talk) 10:58, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture - inside a tap 

message: I'd like to break this down further. What is the term for the part grasped and twisted by the hand? What is the part for the downward-facing opening which the water exits from? 70.51.192.235 (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Specific terms for components
Talk:Cyan Garamonde

message: I don't believe the name "Cayenne" is verifiable. The kana read "KAIEN". I'm changing it unless someone can prove that Cayenne was the intended Japanese name. Viltris 05:55, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And that book is in English? Somehow I doubt that, but the last thing I want is an edit war based on the Japanese name.Viltris 22:35, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an art book.  There's not a lot of text in it.  But there are names in it written in Roman letters and some English, more than in Amano's DAWN (which doesn't have Roman names in it...but those names are established in other places).  I wouldn't want an edit war over it either, but since you don't have the book and I do, it's easiest just to trust me on that point.  I don't think it's necessary to bring in a scan of the page :) 71.110.172.13 07:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese name 

message: Analogous to Terra's article, who really cares about the character's zodiac? Should this be removed? --Bakabaka 17:40, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Zodiac

message: His job class is Samurai? I always thought he was a Knight. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 08:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samurai?
Talk:Governorate

message: Article read "it may also refer to the Governorates and Governor-Generalships of Imperial Russia," which was a circular definition. The translated Russian term has been added. -LlywelynII (talk) 06:11, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Imperial Russia

message: The Spanish Empire had a number of regions administered by a governor (gobernador) which were neither states nor provinces (eg, Rio de la Plata.) The Spanish word is gobernacio'n and the crosslink from that page on the Spanish wiki comes here. "Governation" and "government" (used at the article linked above) are both highly infelicitous, but I'm not certain what English-language scholars of the Spanish Empire refer to the regions as. -LlywelynII (talk) 06:11, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Imperial Spain

message: Do not merge!, would break arab subdivision series. guberniya is seperate as well.
I am also against a merge, as governorate is closer to the term in Ukrainian and Russian than muhafazah. Merging would create very weird references and correlations for those reading about Ukrainian or Russian geography or history that are not correct. If merging, I would suggest carefully going through all the linking pages and removing links that no longer make sense. -- mno 19:11, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
: To add, at this point, this article seems like a disambiguous entry linking to the more relevant ones. In my opinion, this is a correct, and good way, to do it. Most articles will link to the correct and relevant entry from this page in the first place. -- mno 19:11, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. In the process of disambiguating links referring to Arabic, I have run across this term several times. Most of these links refer to Arab countries. If someone were to research this, it might turn out that this governorate refers largely to Arab countries. DanMS 21:24, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Do Not Merge

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. AndrewRT 18:04, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: The article could also use explanation of the "governorates" used by the Dutch East and West Indies Companies. Seems to have been the principal division of their territories. — LlywelynII 22:22, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dutch Indies

message: The Greek bits can be expanded with content from its section on Governor-general. That article should actually only focus on the office and people. This article is where most of the organizational bits should be moved to. — LlywelynII 12:42, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for article expansion
Talk:Gigi Graciette

message: I am the owner of the content listed above (www.gigigraciette.com) and authorize it's use here. For further info, please contact my agent --  gigigraciette@aol.com— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.224.35.128 (talk) 10:04, July 11, 2005
----
Lei que eres single. OMG marry me please!! :D  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.121.45.246 (talk) 06:43, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed the disputed date of birth. As noted by IP 86.147.197.65, none of the sources provided meet WP:RS criteria for personal information in BLPs, nor do they meet the policy requirements of WP:DOB (e.g. "Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources".)--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 16:37, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth