Talk:Sim RPG Maker

message: RPG Maker hasn't been developed by ASCII or Enterbrain for years. There are different catagories within RPG Maker, mainly each to it's own developer. It's dumb to not include this one since it is "simulation RPG MAKER"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.178.133.184 (talk) 08:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

message: I feel that the two makers should be kept separate.  There are several reasons for this.
First of all, the type of games they make fall into different categories.  While it is possible to make tatical style games using the regular RPG Maker, it is not as common a practice as making traditional style RPGs.  Sim RPG Maker is similar to the other makers in some ways, but I feel that it is different enough that it should be kept separate.
Second, the RPG Maker main page seems too cluttered.  Sim RPG Maker would be a small footnote that would seem out of place as a section on the same page as the other makers.  With its own page, it can clearly be differentiated from the other Makers.
Finally, I don't want to see any information lost.  There aren't a whole lot of places to find information of Sim RPG Maker 95 out there.  If they are out there, I haven't found them.  I hope to see this page grow and become a useful and well designed article.
   -Turbo852
:They're totally different concepts and programs, and I strongly believe they should stay seperate.  However, I do believe the vote has already taken place. DMAJohnson 23:28, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think they should be merged.  It is still part of the RPG Maker series, so it should just have, maybe one section in the article. M2K 23:32, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the merger notice. Each installment WILL have it's own page, the changes have already started. merging would just screw everything up, as the current RPG Maker article is being replaced by RPG Maker series, and then apparently the RPG Maker article will become the article for the first Playstation installment, since it's the only one with the title of just "RPG Maker" Valkysas 15:38, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should it be merged? 

message: Though made by the same company, SRPG95 and the RM* series are completely separate, and the way they work is quite different.  The interfaces are drastically different as well.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Natso (talk • contribs). 
:Interfaces don't matter much. As for "the way they work"... you give not one single specific detail on how they actually are different. The only visible difference is the "Sim" in the title, but that's not explained either. How is this not a mere RPG Maker? -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 00:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate 

message: I put up the original title for the game which is "シミューレーションRPGツクール95" and can be translated into romaji as Shimyūrēshon RPG Tsukūru 95. The Japanese don't have an "r" sound, rather a sound that's a mix between "r" and "l". So "Shimyūrēshon" is correct, there is no reason to go and change it to "Shimyūlēshon." Regardless, I just wanted to make it apparent to all who don't know, so that they don't question the translation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.26.37.125 (talk) 05:20, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romaji Translation 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sim RPG Maker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090925171937/http://tkool.jp/products/srpg95/index.html to http://tkool.jp/products/srpg95/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified