Talk:Gilbert U-238 Atomic Energy Laboratory

message: I personally am amazed that any parent would buy this sort of thing for their kids. . . "no honey, the package says it's non toxic if Johnny swallows it". Nowadays the worry would be that terrorists would steal the ore and maybe make bombs. . . ah, how times have changed.RSido 21:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: However, the amount of radioactive material in this toy is miniscule and can't be used to make a bomb.  But, yes, the knee-jerk reaction today is "radioactive" = "bad...bad...Bad...BAD!!!!" :) Cburnett 22:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

text: On that note, can that be referenced and worked into the article?  Cburnett 03:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At the A. C. Gilbert's Discovery Village in Salem, Oregon, it states that the toy was banned for the parental concerns about the radiation. So, shouldn't we state that on the page? Armiris (talk) 18:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honey, let's get the kids a toy! 

message: "1951 Gilbert Toys catalog"
The list of parts that the kit includes appears to be copied from here:
http://www.americanmemorabilia.com/Auction_Item.asp?Auction_ID=31568
Where they state that they throw in the 1951 catalogue as an extra bonus.  I don't think the original kit included the catalogue.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moeburn (talk • contribs) 03:09, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Gilbert company routinely included a catalog of all their products with each kit. I remember seeing their catalog describing the Atomic Energy Lab kit among others, included with my Erector Set, even though I received it long after the product was discontinued. The AEL kit remained an elusive unicorn; I never saw one on display anywhere. Reify-tech (talk) 17:05, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is tragically short. Someone get a reactionary newspaper talking about it so there are current references.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.224.98.35 (talk) 15:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't think it included the catalogue... 

message: It seems like Google Answers isn't a good citation.  Can someone please check that out?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.4.23.6 (talk) 14:52, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gilbert U-238 Atomic Energy Laboratory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070903123042/http://www.americanmemorabilia.com/Auction_Item.asp?Auction_ID=31568 to http://www.americanmemorabilia.com/Auction_Item.asp?Auction_ID=31568
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I'm surprised there is no section speaking as to how much radiation it put out over time and what effects it could have had on a child that kept it in their room for several years. Remarks throughout the article that it was "bad" really don't speak much to bad it was. StarHOG (Talk) 14:17, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was it bad?