lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yokohama Station

message: Is there a better Section placement for this image? 
At the very least, it is far more relevant here than it was at Stem and leaf plot. The Mysterious El Willstro (talk) 05:46, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where better to put this?
Talk:Westfields F.C.

message: I'm not convinced the kits are correct, especially the away one - they can't wear purple (for want of a better way to describe the colour) both home and away...... ChrisTheDude 12:18, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Sorted.
--Ukslim (talk) 16:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Westfields-FC-crest.gif
Talk:Hequembourg House

message: The Miami Springs FL government site has historical pictures of the house before its demolition. Need to see if these are available under Creative Commons to be included in the article. They show the building in a state of disrepair prior to demolition, but still more instructive than a picture of an empty lot! 68.202.117.200 (talk) 17:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: To-do
Talk:Leo G. Carroll

message: In the 1950s it became common cinema practice to show German military personnel in a sympathetic light. I wonder if it is necessary to dwell on Runstedt's war crimes record. Is that necessary in an article on an actor portraying him?--Stetsonharry (talk) 17:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article seems fine now, talking about how Carroll "presented" Rundstedt, rather than what Rundstet actually did or was.  -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 19:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gratuitous war crimes reference 

message: I am sick and tired of having to remove redundant material from Wikipedia articles. There was no need to mention twice that Carroll starred in Topper from 1953 to 1955 with costars Anne Jeffreys and Robert Sterling. Once is sufficient. Sd31263 (talk) 13:19, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please read entry before adding material 

message: In the 1901 Census for West Ham, London, his occupation is listed as "wine trade clerk". In the 1911 census, he is living at the same address and described as a "dramatic agent".
:This could refer to Leo or his father. Can you clarify? Valetude (talk) 13:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify, please
Talk:Web Services Resource Framework

message: the content here naiively belived the WSRF specification and unduly criticised all other approaches to implement state in web services.
I've made the core of the document less opinionated, and moved opinions (with citations) to the Issues section. As with all WS pages, you need a politics section to understand the past behind the specification, and its future.
SteveLoughran 12:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Stuartyeates has tagged this as containing self published citations. What is being referred to here? The technical references are to OASIS standards, which, as a recognised standards body, is capable of issuing normative standards. WS-RF does refers to both the draft (non-normative) WS-Addressing and the final version is one example of the flaws of WS-RF; a criticism isn't raised in the article -though anyone is free to do so.
The only other (current) citation is the "Web Service Grids: An Evolutionary Approach" article, which was issued by the [National eScience Centre. That is part of the UK academic system and as the paper was co-authored by staff as many of the main universities in the UK, it is hard to say "self published". That paper was controversial, but as Tony Hey was one of the authors, you cannot say the people who wrote it were not qualified -or the organisation lacks the authority to self publish. It defined the UK grid organisation's policy regarding WS-RF. I am one of the people to be acknowledged in the paper, but as Jim Gray is also in that list, that is not something about which I wish to hide: we considered ourselves to be the peer-review.
::OASIS can be as recognised as we like, but as per WP:GNG we're looking for significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:02, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  There are some from IBM [] , and a Python API manual [], but I don't see anything that independent out there. It's not really a live standard, AFAIK. Maybe that is something to add. SteveLoughran (talk) 15:47, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self Published Citations
Talk:Tito El Bambino

message: I had to add an original research tag to the beginning of the article because the section about Tito El Bambino's new album "Invicto" contains the following unsourced statement:"Now, Tito is working in his fifth studio album called "Invicto" that will be released in mid to late this year. "--Fandelasketchup (talk) 14:19, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research tag added 

message: Jaja 216.105.67.228 (talk) 06:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  singer
Talk:Black bean paste

message: thumb|right|290px
This the mandarin letter for zao fan sorry my computer cannot write this. so please, people who more capable could help me about this mandarin letter. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Daimond (talk • contribs) .
:What do you want to know? - UtherSRG (talk) 13:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not an "earth" or "rice" radical but a "rock" radical. The characters are "皂矾", a type of hydrated Iron Sulphate. In mineral form they are know as "melanterite". Pretty green crystal. Sjschen 07:57, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Zao fan

message: i have mistaken this item with other item, yesterday i check again this item find out what i look before are mistaken  this item color are green and crytalis not powder.Daimond 16:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake

message: This article seems to be about a sweet paste made from mung beans and calls it dousha, but I think "black bean paste" usually refers to the savoury stuff made from fermented soya beans, also dousha as in mooncakes and doushabao is made from red beans (adzuki) not mung beans, but I'm not 100% on this, it's just what I thought. 
LDHan 16:34, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Should the hanzi for "black bean paste" (the sweet kind discussed here) be 黑豆沙?  Badagnani 18:51, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Looks like it might actually be 油豆沙. Badagnani 19:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

text: This appears to be a tin of red bean (azuki) paste but it's labelled as hei dou sha and "black bean paste". The stuff in the picture on the tin certainly looks darkish red, I haven't opened the tin yet... LDHan 21:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of this article 

message: I somewhat doubt that such a flammable material is used for any culinary reason. I suspect this is a mistake that has been reproduced across the internet. 2600:100E:B013:5039:D10A:43CF:C995:BF93 (talk) 22:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is potassium chlorate really an ingredient?
Talk:List of string quartet ensembles

message: Another good move I think would be to move the list of works (major and minor, with and without articles-about) of compositions for string quartet off of String quartet- a similar move has already been attempted with moderate success, with e.g. Violin concerto and other pages, leaving a list of pieces "near the center of the repertoire" on the concerto page itself. Though people still place their favorite pieces there, of course- as with any policy, to quote Scott Adams, it gives others a reason to say No. Schissel | Sound the Note! 12:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Omitted; Roth String Quartet  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6020:13E:EC1E:4C00:75C6:EB7F (talk) 15:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I was redirected to this page from a search for "List of string quartets".
This makes no sense.  String quartet ensembles are not "string quartets".  This is like searching for "guitar concertos" and instead being sent to a list of guitarists.
I do not have any qualms with this page itself, but "List of string quartets" should not redirect here.  The ensembles are not the compositions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.176.249 (talk) 21:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bizarre redirect
Talk:Rick Tolley

message: I rated this high since there is an upcomming movie We Are Marshall. After the movie fades, it should be rated low. --MECU≈talk 12:59, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it should be changed because the movie is no longer in current releases... notability is not temporary.--Paul McDonald (talk) 14:30, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Automatically Tuned Linear Algebra Software

message: I see nothing here, so what is the problem with this article?  ATLAS is extremely notable. Jeff.science (talk) 09:12, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and I removed the notability template. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 09:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Gang Green

message: Yo, I made some massive edits. Cleaned up the discography section, and then decided to make a full discrography article. Added a navbox. Cleaned up the history. Feel free to correct any mistakes I may have made. TweekTard (talk) 14:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yo back, good work. I made a few edits, and I may have a look at the discog again because its customary to put a summary discography in there as well as the link to the main discography article. Otherwise, good - well done. – B.hotep •talk• 16:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Major edits

message: Back in the day I read somewhere that straight edgers particularly hated Gang Green for promoting substance abuse and whatnot. Shouldn't this be mentioned in some trivia section?--92.114.148.141 (talk) 19:29, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with sXe 
Talk:Gangway (band)

message: A gangway is also a part of a ship.  A naval article links to this article.--24.167.191.111 08:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a disambiguation page? 

message: A single pop band that I've never heard of get's the only record for a common nautical term?  Not good.--75.170.59.34 (talk) 15:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DEFINATELY NEEDS A DISAMBIGUATION PAGE 

message: Should this article not be renamed as above? Gangway is also a literary magazine.--GoneWalkabout (talk) 02:27, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gangway (band) 

message: Now that there's even another Gangway article, this nautical term would definitely need a disambiguation page.--GoneWalkabout (talk) 21:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gangway (film)
Talk:Gatas Parlament

message: *Agree. The one-line articles are not very useful. Bongomatic (talk) 21:22, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't even a "merger". There is no sourced content at all. I'm going to go ahead and redirect. - SummerPhD (talk) 20:01, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band member mergers 

message: Maybe I'm too old and no longer "with it" -- but as I recall, "Ute til Lunch" came out in 1988 or thereabouts. I'd say that was probably the first. Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.44.0.4 (talk) 15:38, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First to rap in Norwegian 
Talk:Tennessee's 2nd congressional district

message: There seems to be an unnecessarily negative sentiment toward democrats and confusing racial implications.  Also, the article assumes that college students are liberal, which may generally be the case, but UT seems to be more of a reflection of the region from which its students came.  The majority of the students here are from strong republican counties across the South, particularly areas such as the mountains and the southern suburbs of Nashville.  I take offense to the statement that we UT students are apolitical, as many of us are politically active and registered in Knox County.  When I have more time, I will try to cleanup the article a little if no one else has already taken care of it.  Rhodesgomer (talk) 16:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the House's website, Tennessee was divided into districts from the 9th Congress on. XinaNicole (talk) 03:54, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see anything in that source that says Tennessee was divided into districts. I just see three representatives.  Bms4880 (talk) 14:44, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Three representatives who are not listed as "Representatives at large".  Compare the page for the 8th Congress which shows Tennessee's representatives as "Representatives at large", and also states such as New Hampshire in the 9th Congress which did have at-large representation.  Those are labelled as "Representatives at large". XinaNicole (talk) 05:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  District origin
Talk:Gaze (band)

message: Article is quite stubby, and already overlaps content in the Rose Melberg article. Other two former band members appear to be non-notable. Anyone else have a view? --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 15:29, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There is certainly scope for expansion here, but probably not to the extent that a merge would not be appropriate, so I think merging what we have would be fine. --Michig (talk) 15:54, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to Rose Melberg article?
Talk:Common good (economics)

message: I have modified the article to refer to "goods" in preference to "good" since the Wiktionary definition for goods states that it is "plural only; not used in singular form".
I would also suggest that the article is moved to "Common goods". This would help to alleviate any confusion with the philosophical meaning of "the common good".
See also a discussion on the Veblen goods discussion page.
RichBerry 13:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: First comment
Talk:Ghoultown

message: This article may not meet the notability criteria for WP:BAND. Improving the number of reliable and verifiable sources would go a long way to establishing the notability of this band, which has certainly had a modestly successful career from what I'm seeing. Here's my very cursory view of the 12 criteria there (note that passing any one criteria could potentially establish notability :
# Has not been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in reliable sources
# Has not had a single or album on any country's national music chart.
# Has not had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country.
# Has not received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one country.
#* The tours the article mentions are both in the US, neither of which appears to have non-trivial coverage.
# Has not released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels 
#* The two labels Ghoultown has recorded with, Angry Planet Records and Zoviet, do not appear to be notable indie labels
# Does not contain two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles.
# Has potentially become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city.
#* The MusicBrainz annotation for the band calls the group "On the forefront of the gothabilly musical genre," and if this is played out in notable/verifiable sources it could potentially establish notability.
# Has not won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy.
# Has not won first, second or third place in a major music competition.
# Has potentially performed music for a work of media that is notable.
#* American Nightmare does have a WP article but is also debatably notable IMO, and Jon Keeyes has his own article but the films Ghoultown performed for do not. WP:BAND states "If this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article." I think given the fact that it's multiple works, that goes toward suggesting notability.
# Has not been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.
# Has not been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or television network.
As you can see, it's just on the cusp of notability on multiple criteria. I support keeping the page personally, but it really needs improvement to demonstrate notability. - - mathmitch7 (talk/contribs) 13:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability + verifiability discussion
Talk:Giant (band)

message: According to Eduardo Rivadavia from Allmusic.com, Giant is placed in the Pop/Rock genre with Hard Rock, Heavy Metal and Glam Metal styles. Another source categorizes Giant amongst others as Hair Metal (which is Glam Metal).
The article should thusly reflect this. Amsaim (talk) 23:32, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it does, doesn't it? FateForger (talk) 17:41, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I had not noticed you had just reverted the edit. Anyway, I fully agree with what you state. FateForger (talk) 17:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

text: I am undoing the third unjustified edit by MATHEUS HS. This edit war must stop. FateForger (talk) 17:57, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Papaver rhoeas

message: The only species of Papaveraceae grown as a field crop on a large scale is Papaver somniferum, the opium poppy.
"The only species of Papaveraceae grown as a field crop on a large scale is Papaver somniferum, the opium poppy."  I question that statement.  I have seen vast fields of white poppies, grown for seeds used in pastry and for adorning the crust of bread.76.188.160.169 (talk) 18:56, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: So what species is used in these vast fields for seed production, and where were they, and can you cite any evidence in support? Plantsurfer (talk) 23:02, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

message: Papaver rhoeas is not Papaver umbonatum, :he:פרג אגסני. Hence, I removed all wrong interwikis (of he:פרג אגסני) from all languages. MathKnight  19:53, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misidentification 

message: Given the existence of a separate article for the Remembrance poppy, the length of the section in this article is excessive. It should be reduced to a short paragraph. Imc (talk) 22:42, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural usage 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Poster papaver 3a.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on November 11, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-11-11. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:25, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Poster papaver 3a.jpg]] to appear as POTD 

message: The intro says the poppy  "is notable as an agricultural weed (hence the "corn" and "field")". What is being stated here? Why hence the "corn" and "field"
:It refers to the common names. I've added a bit to clarify this. Peter coxhead (talk) 13:42, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: What is meant?

message: The "uses" section describes the seeds being used for food as a filling, but this seems more in line with the opium poppy (papaver somniferum), sometimes called the breadseed poppy. I suppose the seeds of this species may also be quite edible, but they don't seem to be cultivated for this purpose. All seeds I see sold online for rhoeas are for growing, not for eating. Buddy Gripple (talk) 15:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Edible Seeds
Talk:Babe Herman

message: Also note http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/04/AR2006100402109.html seems to use this article as a source.
:Well, he cites some of the same quotes, but they didn't necessarily come from here. MisfitToys 19:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: They say that . . .
Babe Herman once called a press conference at which he excoriated the Brooklyn press for making him out to be a zany screwball, said it hurt his family and his career.  It was an eloquent speech, and it truly shamed the assembled reporters.  Babe, no longer a screwball but now man of the hour, punctuated the conclusion by pulling a cigar out of his coat pocket and jamming it into his mouth.  As a conciliatory gesture, numerous men of the press offered lighters and matches.  "Don't bother," said Herman, puffing away, "it's still lit." 
It would be a nice addition of someone can verify it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by WHPratt (talk • contribs) 13:10, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Funny Incident 

message: Re three men on third: I changed the info box that said Herman tripled into a double play.  I recalled the line "Herman didn't triple into a triple play, but he doubled into a double play, which is almost as good." Retrosheet.org doesn't have play-by-play for the game, but the box score shows Herman with a double but no triple.  
However, I'd guess that we can't be sure he's the ONLY major leaguer to 2B into a DP.  So, maybe the item should be restored to something like "only major leaguer to 'triple' [sic] into a triple play," i.e., make it clear that it's a popular but incorrect notion.  Any thoughts? WHPratt (talk) 15:15, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of you bums is out ... make that two!
Talk:Gil Mantera's Party Dream

message: This seems like a joke article...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.86.105.89 (talk) 23:07, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Brian James Gage. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 11#Brian James Gage until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 20:06, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Brian James Gage" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Glass Tiger

message: SunCrow (talk) 12:53, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more sources 

message: Hey, just a little advice: you could translate some articles of this band that are available on the Wikipedia in spanish, in order to complete those articles.
--Saviourofthe (talk) 18:08, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia in spanish 

message: Hello guys! I'm planning to move the discography to its own article which I expanded. Check it out please!
*Saviourofthe (talk) 16:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creating discography
Talk:Breece D'J Pancake

message: Note: Ochs attended Staunton, not Fort Union.   Article needs more references -especially any time you have a quote from someone.  Also could use a bibliography of his stories, when and where published.  Tvoz |talk 02:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: removed the following: 
This is sourced.http://www.pulitzer.org/page/frequently-asked-questions I think there's scope for a sentence or two about the hoax within the article, but first a suitable reference for the remaining section needs finding. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 23:21, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change by IP
Talk:Blackfield (album)

message: The article currently mentions that some version of Feel So Low is apparently included as an LP-exclusive.  This song is originally from Porcupine Tree's Lightbulb Sun, of course.  I'm wondering if someone has any additional information about this recording of the song.  Once that information is acquired, the information about the song originally being released by Porcupine Tree should be added, but right now it would seem awkward since it would be only the partial story.  Dfsghjkgfhdg (talk) 02:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Feel So Low
Talk:Goldenhorse

message: Goldenhorse were an important and much loved musical force in the 2000's in New Zealand and deserve a much fuller write-up in Wikipedia. There must be plenty of people out there who are  familiar with their music and their history and are competent write on these matters. I am not that person. Rob  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.109.211.209 (talk) 22:05, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update this page! 
Talk:Maranello

message: Isn't there a soap opera called Maranello? 67.182.183.25 (talk) 12:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Soap Opera