Talk:Karen Connelly

message: While I think it important to mention the controversy surrounding Touch the Dragon, I don't think it necessary that it be brought up twice in the same article.--Victoriagirl 17:34, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Touch the Dragon''

message: Please don't alter another person's talk to alter their meaning. 
On other points, see Talk page guidelines:
:A talk page is research for the article, and the policies that apply to articles also apply to talk pages. Research and debate should meet the same standards of verification, neutral point of view and no original research. There is reasonable allowance for speculation, suggestion and personal knowledge with a view to to prompting further investigation, but it is a serious misuse of a talk page to continue to argue any point that has not met policy requirements.
So any chat of major or minor is neither here nor there unless there is a verifiable source to back it up, and should not be included if disputed. Happy editing!
Tyrenius 01:24, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Policy

message: I have done a quick edit of the article, purely on stylistic grounds. I know nothing of this poet and have no viewpoint, so my edit should not be interpreted as reflecting one. I note there are no references, and strongly recommend this. See Anna Svidersky for a well-referenced article. It uses two different methods of coding a) citation templates b) manually (I have used the latter). Tyrenius 01:39, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Any editor's opinion about a book is not suitable content for wikipedia ... content needs to be verifiable and we should cite sources. Stumps 04:45, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit

message: There is a very big notice at the top of the page warning about libel. To say someone has done something illegal, without providing a cast iron verifiable source, e.g. a leading national newspaper, contravenes this. I think that should be perfectly clear. Tyrenius 20:10, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: LIBEL

message: The following contributors to this page have been blocked indefinitely as abusive sockpuppets:
*Anthony Head
*Alice of Wonderland
*Uberall
*Mark W-Smith
This IP is linked to those user names and has been blocked for 1 week:
*202.248.159.3
Contributions to the article by the above may be freely deleted by other editors. Comments by them on this page may be ignored, or struck through. Tyrenius 18:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sockpuppets

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Karen Connelly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070114161144/http://www.karenconnelly.ca/index.aspx to http://www.karenconnelly.ca/index.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060127011409/http://www.shanmonster.com/interview/001.html to http://www.shanmonster.com/interview/001.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified