Talk:Johan Staël von Holstein

message: There is a discussion about this article at the Biographies of Living Persons Noticeboard.Anythingyouwant (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: BLPN

message: Why remove this? − Safety Cap (talk) 05:12, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References' "Accessed On" 

message: Ok, this article is basically too long, and too biased. Right now it reads like a promotional bio for some commercial product.
I think the Swedish version of the article is more appropriate in scope. 
Especially the Acknowledgement is just full of subjective praise. 
All the various lists are also an eye-sore here: some summarizing is in order. 
Compared to many other (truly) notable Swedes, like Afzelius, Kamprad, etc, this is just disproportionately extensive.
Andailus (talk) 13:40, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  vanity-bio 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Johan Staël von Holstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.asiaone.com/Business/News/SME%2BCentral/Story/A1Story20090320-129897.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719014329/http://www.resume.se/nyheter/2008/12/17/stael-von-holstein-kickad-/ to http://www.resume.se/nyheter/2008/12/17/stael-von-holstein-kickad-/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Johan Staël von Holstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722153517/http://www.banqueinvik.lu/ to http://www.banqueinvik.lu/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101119054524/http://incredibleurope.com/speakers.html to http://www.incredibleurope.com/speakers.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101124132833/http://www.todayonline.com/Tech/EDC101008-0000039/Virtual-market-square to http://www.todayonline.com/Tech/EDC101008-0000039/Virtual-market-square
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: John beta, could you link those sources please? Vermont (talk) 18:23, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crowd1 

message: What is an incubator please? Does this company hatch chickens?Spinney Hill (talk) 09:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  IQube  

message: Can somebody rephrase this please?. It appears to be written in English but might as well be in Sumerian cuneiform.Spinney Hill (talk) 09:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The current text gives the impression that it was a scam. Someone set up a company using promising buzzwords, so as to extract money from investors, and then kept the money. The company never actually did anything. (I have no way of knowing whether that's what actually happened in this instance.) Maproom (talk) 22:03, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  MyCube  

message: Ablasaur, who started the section above, has been blocked for using multiple accounts (about 25 different sockpuppets were identified by a CU) to make undeclared paid edits. Looking at the edit history of this article, it is very clear that there's been repeated attempts to promote the person the article is about, and to remove well-sourced information that is not unambiguously promotional and positive. A number of different single-purpose accounts have been doing this, and it is not very likely that those are regular volunteer editors like the rest of us. Hence the "undeclared paid" template. --bonadea contributions talk 23:23, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undeclared paid editing