Talk:Palomino

message: Threw out the "laundry list" of famous Palominos.  Once these start, they grow exponentially and create edit wars over what is "famous."  By the time you have little Susie wondering why her pony Goldie isn't on the list, it's a mess.
If the horse is famous enough to warrant a wikipedia article, then if the named animal isn't mentioned in the text, then create a category:Famous Palominos and put it there.  Which is what I am about to do.  Montanabw(talk) 17:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tossed the laundry list 

message: I like the additions Pitke made to the color breed registry section.  I edited a bit to tighten them up.  I found the requirements rather illogical, but oh well.  We didn't write them.  Tried to phrase them as simply as possible.  Thanks for finding the info!   I don't think we can really spin these off, though, at least yet.  (Am open to debate on the issue, however)   What is frustrating here is that, unlike Pinto horse and Pinto Horse Association of America, which did get successfully split;  take away the color breed section, what remains is so sparse as to be suitable to be merged into the cream gene article, just as we did with cremello and perlino.  However, we really cannot merge this article due to the very same color breed registries (there is also the American creme and white horse registry, but it is largely defunct, but I suppose it is a model too...)  I know this article really bugs Countercanter, and I kind of see why, but the way I see WP:NOR I also don't really think we can do any more than to just have a hybrid color-and-registry piece given the immense popularity of the palomino registry -- they have shows, national competition, everything.  Ah, phooey.   Thoughts all???   Montanabw(talk) 00:35, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A side note on the confusing breed rules of the PHBA: I always thought this means the PHBA will accept the few non-spotted "untypical" appies and extreme minimum (or simply non-spotted) paints and pintos if they are palomino. I'd imagine non-spotted foals are not that rare when combining two heterozygote paints/pintos. Please excuse my dates and similar details, I'm not confident with them and tend to forget the way the date is written in the USA style. I also try to remember the USA spelling, but as I've written more than 10 years the UK way, it sometimes just slips the wrong way. Pitke (talk) 08:46, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color breed issue 

message: A typical palomino (front). The horse in the background looks like a liver chestnut with a flaxen mane and tail, but coloring could possibly be due to the silver dapple gene. Some color registries may accept both shades as "palomino".
On this image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Silz_cheval1.jpg (about half way down the article).
Maybe this should just be A typical palomino (front).SeanJA (talk) 01:59, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The caveat is there because some people think the back horse is also a palomino due to the light-colored mane.  Montanabw(talk) 18:23, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caption is a bit much... 

message: — Assignment last updated by Dmp180002 (talk) 19:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Advanced Writing and Research