Talk:Ecology of the Sierra Nevada

message: The article quoted a fire return interval of lodgepole forests in Yosemite at 764 years.  This is almost certainly way too high, and is unsupported by any references that I have seen, as well as my personal observations and data collections.  I removed that figure and re-worded the paragraph to make it more coherent in its comparisons with other forest types and Rocky Mtn lodgepole forests.
Jeeb 16:58, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire return intervals, etc 

message: It seems odd that the article is called the "biology" of the Sierra Nevada. Wouldn't "ecology" be more appropriate? If there are no protests, I'll move it to Ecology of the Sierra Nevada. -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 02:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I forget why I chose this title --- ecology seems better to me, too. hike395 07:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I moved the page, as you can see. -- Cielomobile talk / contribs 07:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article? 

message: Editors here may be best able to evaluate the merit of this stub: High Sierra (biome). Is it worth keeping? Can it be expanded or should it be merged here? Any sources possible? -Will Beback · † · 05:12, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, a merge point here (or to Sierra Nevada (U.S.)) would be best, I think hike395 07:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Sierra (biome) 

message: Shouldn't it be "Ecology of the Sierra Nevada"? Why "Environment"? Why not parallel structure with Natural history of California (which used to be Ecology of California)? I'm puzzled about the change and non-uniformity, perhaps we can discuss further. —hike395 (talk) 07:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article 

message: Given that two ecoregion articles (California oak woodland and California interior chaparral and woodlands) already cover the ecology of the lot hills, I believe that Sierra Nevada foothills is going to remain a redundant stub for a long time. The content of Sierra Nevada foothills would very nicely expand the Foothill Woodland and Chaparral section of this article. I propose merging the other article into that section and redirect to that section. If that section expands further, we can always split the article bak out. —hike395 (talk) 00:36, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ecology of the Sierra Nevada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130404002733/http://www.nature.org/ourscience/sciencefeatures/conservation-atlas-1.xml to http://www.nature.org/ourscience/sciencefeatures/conservation-atlas-1.xml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090906195121/http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se/artspec_information.asp?thingid=84109 to http://globaltwitcher.auderis.se/artspec_information.asp?thingid=84109
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140821035226/http://www.cfr.washington.edu/research.cesu/reports/J9W88050011-Final-Report-Sierra-Park-Lichens.pdf to http://www.cfr.washington.edu/research.cesu/reports/J9W88050011-Final-Report-Sierra-Park-Lichens.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:43, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified