Talk:Red Dead Revolver

message: I noticed there is a claim that the game wasn't at TGS 2002 with a link to IGN's list of games at Capcom's booth, as well as citations from IGN that the game wasn't in a playable state.
There is recorded footage of the game, in a playable state, at TGS 2002.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZylkAhjn34  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.99.119 (talk) 19:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect that they either showed an older build or the video has an incorrect description. The IGN source reads, specifically, "The PlayStation 2 listing obviously omits two key titles: Devil May Cry 2 and Red Dead Revolver. Neither of those were playable at the recent ECTS exhibition in Europe, so their status at TGS should be a useful indicator of whether they will make their planned winter releases." and per the adjacent GameSpot source, it also missed E3 the following year, so I doubt that they had an intermediate working build shown at one game show but missed the one prior and the one after. Anyhow, as a precaution, I changed it to ECTS for now. Lordtobi (✉) 21:25, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: TGS 2002

message: It says on this page that Jack Swift is killed at the end of the game.  But I got an ending in which he survives.  Don't tell me I'm the only one who's gotten this.  Musha 01:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article is mostly a game plot summary, and there's very little info about the actual gameplay - just that it's a "third-person shooter" which is an exceptionally broad category which includes everything from Grand Theft Auto to Resident Evil 4.  I think many people will be interested in this game due to the success of it's sequel, and would like to know how the gameplay compares to Red Dead Redemption.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.154.77.22 (talk) 00:38, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Funny you should bring it up. It used to have a gameplay section, but it was eventually removed because no one developed it. If you can provide a gameplay section, even if it begins as a stub section, it will greatly help the article. I wouldn't compare it to Red Dead Redemption though, simply because I'm pretty sure that the current standard is to compare subsequent games to those that came first, not the other way around. A description such as that found in Red Dead Redemption would be perfect for this article. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 03:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay Section? 

message: Despite the fact that there is a warning not to have writers listed, other wikis (such as the Finnish and the Spanish one) have 3 writers listed (Robert Bacon, Casey Fahy, and David Ferris), a list which IMDb corroborates, as does this website. I'll keep looking for corroborating evidence from more reliable sources, but it seems that there were writers on this game.
Is the policy to only include writers credited by the work itself? If so, is there a place where this policy is made clear? Thank you Packer1028 (talk) 01:31, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , in both sources provided (though neither is reliable), all three are credited for additional writing, or as it is given in the game, "Additional Story and Text Support". This would mean that they were not the lead writers, and the actual lead writer(s) was/were forgotten or left the studio before the game was finished. Lordtobi (✉) 06:00, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the clarification! Packer1028 (talk) 01:01, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Credited writers