Talk:Cliveden

message: Anyone know when he bought the house? He only become Duke in 1874, so if he bought it before that, he bought it as Marquess. Petsco 08:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Duke of Westminster

message: If this page must have an info box, does it really need to tell us that the place has parking, refeshments and a shop? It would be an odd sort of 5 star hotel if it did not serve refreshments, offer parking and try to sell something. Even so, this is information for a tourist/travel/advertising site - not Wikipedia.  Giano  19:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: My inclination would be to delete it all together as redundant. By the time one has scrolled down to it the relevant info has already been conveyed in the lead para (as a lead para should). And it looks ugly :) Nancy talk 19:37, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yerse, I agree, but one author has expanded the page, so his view should be listened to and given priority on this. I'm of the view that it's courteous to say the principal/main authors/maintainers want them they can have them. I've only looked in because something (not the info-box) caught my attention - nothing more.  Giano  19:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info box 

message: The 100-foot (30 m)-tall clock tower, which is actually a water tower (still working to this day) was added in 1861 by the architect Henry Clutton. Then why is it shown in the 1851 picture of the second house? --76.105.145.143 (talk) 05:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Clocktower??

message: I have added text on Cliveden War Cemetery, within the grounds, in section Astor era, to complement the photo of the memorial statue allegedly modelled on Lady Astor, cited to the CWGC.Cloptonson (talk) 21:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cliveden War Cemetery

message: The section on Spring Cottage concludes by stating that "the Profumo Affair...led to the fall of the Macmillan government."  I don't think such a direct causal link can be made, certainly the main article on the Profumo Affair does not attempt to do so.  I would suggest something like,   "the Profumo Affair which so damaged the reputation of the Macmillan government."    I'll make the change in a few days if it isn't opposed.  KJP1 (talk) 21:30, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Spring Cottage and the [[Profumo Affair]]

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cliveden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161011005616/http://www.nationaltrustcollections.org.uk/object/766108.2 to http://www.nationaltrustcollections.org.uk/object/766108.2
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110822074700/http://www.rhs.org.uk/Gardens/News/Maze-at-Cliveden to http://www.rhs.org.uk/Gardens/News/Maze-at-Cliveden
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:02, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. The second stage of the project, after an assessment period, is to try to address missing references on the pages for some of the Top-10-most-visited properties, of which Cliveden is one. I hope to start this work shortly, but please do let me know if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 17:19, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The pilot was extended by 10 days and I am beginning work to improve the Cliveden page today. Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot