Talk:ACC Championship Game

message: I checked the official ACC website and ESPN.com and could not find any info on an MVP for the first ACC Championship Game.  Does the ACC even give an MVP award?  If not then I guess we can delete that column in the table, otherwise I'd like to see it filled like the table on the SEC Championship Game page.  Seancp 01:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MVP??

message: Is there a reason why the coaches' poll rankings are being used when the AP poll is generally considered the more authoritative and is the more widely used poll?  Binabik80 16:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Coaches poll was selected because it is a factor in the BCS.  The AP poll is not generally considered more authoritative....it just depends on college football fans and which poll they prefer.  Honestly, I wouldn't have a problem with both polls being listed. Seancp 17:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coaches' poll 

message: Where is next year's ACCCG being held?  I haven't been able to find that anywhere. 74.234.5.72 08:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: JAX. --BigDT (416) 20:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 

message: I have used WRAL (Raleigh, NC, TV station) as a source for the announcement about the 2008-2011 games instead of http://www.theacc.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/121207aaa.html so that an independent source was used. However, the ACC announcement does include game dates:
*December 6 2008, Raymond James Stadium
*December 5 2009, Raymond James Stadium
*December 4 2010, Bank of America Stadium
*December 3 2011, Bank of America Stadium
It also notes that one reason Tampa got the '08 game was that Charlotte was hosting a citywide convention that year. —C.Fred (talk) 18:29, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008-2011 games 

message: I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of May 10, 2008, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Pass
:2. Factually accurate?: Pass
:3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
:4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
:5. Article stability? Pass
:6. Images?: Pass
  If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.</div> --Johntex\talk 00:45, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Successful [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] nomination

message: Hi,
Following a rule change, Atlantic Coast Conference football championship games now fails featured topic criteria 1.d. and 3.c., as 2008 ACC Championship Game needs to be audited for quality and added to the topic. The topic has 6 months from the time of the rule change, or until 2009-01-03, to re-meet the criterion - rst20xx (talk) 00:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Atlantic Coast Conference football championship games Featured Topic under 6-month retention

message: When any team (not just VT) has a rank in any poll it should be displayed to give the reader as much information as possible. Just leaving a team unranked gives absolutely no information as to the relative positions of the teams playing. It is not "rigging" to include a ranking whenever it is available. Rreagan007 (talk) 15:32, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Within the article about the game itself, I think it's reasonable to list any/all rankings. Within the table, it's not useful to be switching among multiple polls; it makes it unclear which poll their ranking was in. —C.Fred (talk) 16:22, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've got to agree with Fred on this one. Using the Coaches' Poll for tables and such is standard within the Wikiproject. We just had a discussion on that. JKBrooks85 (talk) 20:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I still disagree but will defer to you guys on this Rreagan007 (talk) 03:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I can definitely understand where you're coming from, but it's a style thing. I guess we're trying to get anyone who looks at these charts to not be confused by all the different ranking systems available. It's easier to compare #22 in the coaches' poll to #17 in the coaches' poll than #24 in the AP Poll to #17 in the coaches' poll. JKBrooks85 (talk) 08:51, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rankings

message: We've got conflicting attendance reports for the '09 game. The State, a newspaper based in Columbia, is reporting it as "in front of 42,815 at Raymond James Stadium." One of their "sound off" sidebar items mentions "Free-ticket giveaways to kids in both end zones, making it look good for TV," which suggests they're only counting paid attendance. By contrast, Sports Illustrated reported "Attendance: 57,227." What other sources are reporting attendance, so we can come up with a most-valid number? —C.Fred (talk) 17:27, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009 attendance figures 

message: I believe the article should be renames to ACC Football Championship Game to avoid ambiguousness with the other ACC Championships for Basketball, Baseball, etc. --BuffaloChip97 (talk) 15:39, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Except that's not the title of the game. This is the only game that's properly the ACC Championship Game; I'm moving it back and moving the disambiguation page to a …(diasmbiguation) title. —C.Fred (talk) 01:25, 17 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose to Rename article to ACC Football Championship Game 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.centralohio.com/ohiostate/stories/20030708/football/611709.html
** In 2005 ACC Championship Game on 2011-05-25 07:54:40, 404 Not Found
** In 2006 ACC Championship Game on 2011-05-26 01:55:43, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 ACC Championship Game on 2011-05-27 14:54:13, 404 Not Found
** In 2005 ACC Championship Game on 2011-06-11 13:23:40, 404 Not Found
** In 2007 ACC Championship Game on 2011-06-15 01:15:17, 404 Not Found
** In ACC Championship Game on 2011-06-19 22:37:29, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 22:38, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on ACC Championship Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120213172740/http://www.theacc.com/genrel/070203aaa.html to http://www.theacc.com/genrel/070203aaa.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ACC Championship Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130525205210/http://www.theacc.com/genrel/101804aaa.html to http://www.theacc.com/genrel/101804aaa.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ACC Championship Game. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090321140111/http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_137540.html to http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_137540.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:59, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I've made a change to the SEC Championship Game and Big 12 Championship Game pages that I'd like to make here as well; using team colors only for the winning team in the results table (rather than using team colors for both teams). I've had difficulty reading these tables, as coloring both teams yields low readability; using colors just for the winning team is much clearer. Comments welcome, thanks. Dmoore5556 (talk) 04:56, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Change implemented, thank you. Dmoore5556 (talk) 04:21, 5 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team colors in results table 

message: While searching theacc.com for anything about the change in sponsorship—and I can't find a positive announcement, only the conspicuous absence of Dr Pepper from mentions of the 2019 game—I found that the ACC typically styles the game as "2019 Atlantic Coast Conference Football Championship Game". Based on that change of usage, should we move the article to "ACC Football Championship Game" and change the article accordingly? Or should we just mention the official title in the lede and keep it as "ACC Championship Game" elsewhere? —C.Fred (talk) 17:29, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title revisited 

message: Withdrawn, not closed, in favor of separate smaller RM bunches. Dicklyon (talk) 15:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Dicklyon: Let's be clear here, it's not a matter of preferring multiple RMs, it's a matter of this being a cluster fuck of a nomination. These are all quite separate from one another and cannot be properly evaluated and voted on as a bundled nomination. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:11, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it.  Cluster fuck. Dicklyon (talk) 23:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 April 2024