lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hazel Grove High School

message: * Please can you find out what year the school was founded?
* How many staff are there?
* Please do write a history the school.
* Please correct the headteachers section if it is wrong, can you add the  missing first names?
* This article must be kept neutral: WP:NPOV.
Myke251 15:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A Message To The School Council

message: Would it be OK to add information and pdf's of the school prospectus as well as images that portray the school site. We are working on this however it is of course a long process as we want to ensure that the article is correct and provides as much interesting information about the school as possible. All the things you have mentioned will hopefully be added.
:Yeah, PDFs can be linked in the external links section. Feel free to add images. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Myke251 (talk • contribs) 20:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A Message From The School Council

message: I added a new logo and now its gone!
:The image didn't upload so I reverted it back. Upload the image again Myke251 23:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What on earth????
Talk:Trade Union Social Citizens List

message: i object to the prod. the result is only for the 2005 election, not entire history of group. --Soman 15:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Go-Machine

message: As a stub with no useful content, I've turned this into a redirect, since I find this preferable to deletion.  Friday (talk) 15:55, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep deletion would have got us caught in a cycle that would have made it difficult to bring this back to life. It is on the 2000 AD to do list and so I have removed the redirect and sketched out a proper stub. (Emperor 17:47, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect
Talk:David Norgrove

message: It's kind of amzing that the figurehead for one of the most sexist and anti father and child reports ever published is mainly noted for his business career!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.61.61.99 (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amazing
Talk:Roberto Clemente Community Academy

message: Source has been provided. PrioritizeEducation 16:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On page 
* Ramos-Zayas, Ana Y. National Performances: The Politics of Class, Race, and Space in Puerto Rican Chicago. University of Chicago Press, July 15, 2003. , 9780226703596. p. 234.
There is a 1997 political cartoon by Jack Higgins that portrays the school with posters saying "You are now leaving the United States of America" and "¡Viva P.R. Libre! Welcome to Puerto Rico" and the subtitle is "Loco Control" with Loco meaning "crazy" in Spanish.
WhisperToMe (talk) 05:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political cartoon
Talk:XM214 Microgun

message: The miniguns in movies had thier rate of fire slowed down to less than 2,000rpm. A Hand-Held Minigun was believed to have been tested by Commandos in the 1970s but was found too bulky, clumbersome and hard to control so therefore the idea was dropped.
The likes of the German MG3 and the Spanish CETME Ameli is sometimes regarded as a 'Minigun' substitute having a high rate of fire.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by EX STAB (talk • User:EX STAB 01:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By whom?  I've never seen a single source that has suggested that. -- Thatguy96 03:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Man-Portable' Minigun Substitutes

message: An image would be helpful...--Eddie 21:50, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images? 

message: What's the direct link of a patent for the Neal submachine gun to the XM214?Mytg8 (talk) 15:19, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neal submachine gun? 
Talk:Marbas

message: This page is NOT a hoax. Barbas is a demon referenced in the Ars Goetia, an ancient grimoir. I'm not purporting that Barbas is a real being, only that this is the correct information regarding it. Ghola8
*I have rewritten the intro to provide the proper context. --Satori Son 16:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: section header
Talk:1500–1550 in European fashion

message: I added categories and fixed a few glaring errors in grammer. The article still needs work, which I would willingly do right now if I were less sleepy.  — AnnaKucsma   (Talk to me!) 16:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for starting this; I have been meaning to do it for ages.  I'll help. - PKM 17:43, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I added pictures and expanded the men's section.  Will do more. - PKM 18:35, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup still needed

message: Did women really wear corsets (outside of certain geographic areas) before the 1520's? Churchh 21:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  AnnaKucsma's info mostly applies to England in the 1530s and '40s. This article needs some expansion to cover the entire period and all of Western Europe. Lots of good images in the Commons for this period.  - PKM 22:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Corsets

message: Shouldn't the title be "1500-1550 in European fashion"? This title is misleading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.6.26.151 (talk) 22:43, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Presumably this German accountant's "Book of Clothes" fits in here somewhere? -- Theramin (talk) 23:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Matthäus Schwarz]]

message: مد در دوره 1500-1550 در اروپای غربی با لباس های حجیم پوشیده شده در لایه های فراوان مشخص می شود (یک واکنش به دمای خنک کننده عصر یخبندان کوچک ، به ویژه در شمال اروپا و جزایر انگلیس). پارچه های متضاد ، مژه ها ، گلدوزی ، تزئینات اعمال شده و سایر اشکال تزئین سطح برجسته شد. خطوط باریک و بلند اواخر دوره قرون وسطی با یک سایز بزرگ ، مخروطی برای زنان با پهنای لگن و به طور گسترده ای مربع برای مردان با عرض در شانه ها ، جایگزین شد. آستین ها در مرکز توجه قرار گرفتند ، پف کرده ، بریده بریده ، دکمه های سر دست را باز کرده و به عقب برگرداندند تا پوشش های متضاد نشان داده شود. Chicairani (talk) 07:49, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1500-1550  مد اروپای غربی
Talk:Foundation stone

message: isnt this the same as the article Foundation Stone??????--Tresckow 03:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ok its not really the same, but it cant be that the only difference in a Lemma is writing a letter capital or not. Maybe a disamb and more clear Lemmas like Foundation Stone (Dome of the Rock)--Tresckow 03:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's even easier than that. This is not such a complicated scenario as Trip the light fantastic; we can just link from one to the other, which I will do right now. Vectro 05:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  redundant
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Queen/Songs

message: * I disagree with the B-Class rating requirement.  Can we go with something like "Is of sufficient size that it doesn't qualify as a stub, and is accurate and NPOV"?  This seems like the same thing as B-class, but isn't as hard to decipher (coming in, I had no idea what a B-class article was, and I'm still not positive).  Ral315 (talk) 16:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: B-Class

message: Why are Queen's song articles few? I can't understand it! Queen song articles shold be made such as The Beach Boys, The Beatles. Why must not be Queen possible although a lot of Beach Boys and Beatles song articles were made? Because are they historical? Queen is historical, too!! I'd like to correct song articles being merged and redirected to album articles. --Hatto (talk) 12:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Queen's song articles
Talk:Auto Avio Costruzioni 815

message: The presence or absence of a new company called Auto Avio Costruzioni has no bearing on the subject of this article, which is the Auto Avio Costruzioni 815.  Such information would be better suited to an article on the company than to an article on this car. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 23:31, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  ...aaand it hasn't helped. What's the next move? Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 01:05, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please keep edits relevant to the subject
Talk:Charles Ogletree

message: This thing reads like a resume. I'm going to find some tags to put up. Needs to be chopped down and rewritten. KConWiki (talk) 04:49, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I pulled off the "advertisement" tag box because that's too harsh and might seem to denigrate the subject, but left the "rewrite" box in place because I agree.  Would it be appropriate to pull his works into a separate article, something like "Henry Louis Gates Writings"?  I don't have an example to point to, but I know they're out there. —LisaSmall T/C 09:08, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

text: his current state in news is not in this article   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.191.14 (talk) 11:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: References available upon request?

message: Suggested sister link to add to this article's External links sect:

Readers and editors may find additional suitable images there,
— Cirt (talk) 02:21, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested sister link 
Talk:Sheppey United F.C.

message: This page has been tagged as not notable as it has not been shown that this football team has competed in the FA Cup which is one of the criteria of Football team notability in England.Delusion23 (talk) 22:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Charles Swan (pirate)

message: The article says "... and when the captain decided to abandon the attempt on the galleon, his men mutinied" but it isn't clear which galleon it is talking about.  RJFJR (talk) 16:22, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

message: The link for Raja Laut links to a ship, and there is no reference to Charles Swan or to a person in the 17th Century Cloidl (talk) 17:19, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raja Laut
Template talk:Latest preview software release/Firefox

message: Schapel, Lets not get confused over product naming and version numbering. This is version 2.0b2, and the old version was 2.0b1. The product name is Beta 2. Your argument is countered by the fact that http://www.mozilla.org/projects/bonecho/releases/2.0b1.html also calls itself Beta 1, however all file names (downloads), folder names (ftp), version names (in the about dialog), etc. are known as 2.0b1. It is the same with version 2.0b2. Thanks T. Moitie [talk] 16:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also note in the image: :Image:Firefox2.0b2.png in the about box it refers to itself as Version 2.0b2 Thanks, T. Moitie [talk] 16:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A file name is just a file name. A folder name is just a folder name. A user agent string is just a user agent string. However, what Mozilla reports as the version of this release is 2.0 Beta 2. -- Schapel 00:47, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the about box of any Beta 2 installation it will say "version 2.0b2". Its not a question that they've changed it for this version. They always refer to other versions with their version names.    . But those aren't version numbering. They are referring to the name of the version, not the version number itself, which is what we want to report in the release box, if not just for accuracy, but for style as well. Having wordage there looked to me slightly odd (if you don't mind me saying). Hope this clears it up, T. Moitie [talk] 01:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Version Numbering
Talk:Charles Vane

message: The articles says: "Vane's final blow came after his ship was wrecked in a storm in February 1719 and he and one other survivor were washed up on a humanless island in the Bay of Honduras". This makes me rather curious who the other survivor was. Also, wouldn't 'uninhabited' be a more appropriate word than 'humanless'?
Junuxx 13:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: These are generally frowned upon for historical figures and I'm not sure it helps the article.  Also, is popular culture a byword for TV/video games, because what about Vane's prominent featuring in Woodard's Pirate Republic?  I'm leaning toward scrapping the section.  I don't want to dump on anyone's hard work, what do you all think? The Cap'n (talk) 07:42, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular Culture Section 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: David Pickering (2006). Pirates: From corsairs and cutlasses to parrots and planks. London: Collins. (a book for children). Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:25, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:RJ48

message: I'm intrigued by the fact that several vendors sell 10P10C modular connectors as "RJ48".  Considering that RJ48 doesn't even use those connectors (never mind the fact that the RJ USOCs aren't names of physical connectors), I wonder how that happened.
It would help if I had even one example of what a 10P10C is used for.  Maybe it's a version of RJ48 I don't know about, or something similar to RJ48?  If you know of an example of 10P10C in use, please add it to this discussion.
Bryan Henderson 16:41, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wither 10P10C?

message: I was under the impression that RJ48 plugs are wired to TIA568B except on a crossover cable reversing pairs 1&2 instead of 2&3.  I was unable to find a definitive answer on this, but I believe the pinout diagram on this page shows an incorrect color code.  A cable wired in this manner would probably work for short distances, but would create crosstalk problems on longer runs since pairs 1 and 3 are split.
 1 Pin - Orange       (Orange/White)  ---    Pin 1 - Blue         (White/Blue)
 2 Pin - White/Blue   (Orange)        ---    Pin 2 - White/Orange (Blue)
 3 Pin - Green                        ---    Pin 3 - Green
 4 Pin - Blue                         ---    Pin 4 - Orange       
 5 Pin - White/Orange (White/Blue)    ---    Pin 5 - White/Blue   (White/Orange)
 6 Pin - White/Green                  ---    Pin 6 - White/Green
 7 Pin - White Brown                  ---    Pin 7 - White Brown
 8 Pin - Brown                        ---    Pin 8 - Brown
If anyone can definitively reference the correct wiring, perhaps this could be corrected?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Justduit (talk • contribs) 13:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct color code?
Talk:Charlie Robison

message: Much of the information in the Career section is unverifiable by any online sources, primary or secondary. In particular, the laundry list of band members are not only missing citation but have notability issues of their own. I feel this portion at least should be deleted or at least be supported by sources. BigMoose22 (talk) 00:09, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Band Members: Notability and Verification
Talk:Charlotte Pullein-Thompson

message: Has she written anything published the name Charlotte Pullein–Thompson? --never her legal name if i understand correctly. I don't find Pullein[-]Thompson at VIAF (search, which ignores the hyphen if provided).
"Although she married and became Charlotte Fyfe, she has not published under her married name." The U.S. Library of Congress cites Best Hens for You (2006, fiction or cookbook?) by Charlotte Popescu for: "also publishes under her married name, Charlotte Fyfe". I find only Popescu and Fyfe identified by the library, with one and two books respectively credited to them. Credited to Fyfe, one "research by" ; one "edited by" .
: The latter is a British edition (the only edition I guess), so she published under the Fyfe name at least once in the U.K. --P64 (talk) 01:49, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names
Talk:Charlotte Wood

message: A full listing of shortlisted titled for the Miles Franklin Award has now been added.  Does that qualify as a "citation"?
Perry Middlemiss 04:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shortlisting for Miles Franklin Award 
Talk:Josetsu

message: This article was categorized as 1405 births & 1423 Deaths - but the same article notes Josetsu was naturalised in 1370. My guess is the years are meant to represent when he flourished, i.e. his artwork is producing, not his actual birth/death years. I am removing the categories and noting fl. for flourishing next to the years. Keithh (talk) 22:04, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth/Death Years
Talk:Chelsea Peretti

message: Is this the creator of the Rejection Line? Or is that a different Chelsea? 67.151.97.194 (talk) 17:39, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chelsea Sexton

message: A note to friends of "the other" Chelsea Sexton - I am sure your friend is a wonderful person, but I suggest you wait until she fulfills her undeniable promise before you create a Wikipedia entry for her.  In the mean time, please respect this entry for the better known, although no more worthy in a universal sense, Chelsea Sexton.  Thanks very much.  Fbagatelleblack 21:39, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eagle Creek (Columbia River tributary)

message: Please be careful when reverting, that you do not change more than you intended. Regarding posters, most scenic places wind up being used on posters, calendars, postcards, etc. I don't see why it's worth noting that this particular creek is used on posters. -Pete 20:04, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, its not the best image (faded and blurry), and with such a short stub, three images is a bit of overkill, don't you think? I'm also not too fond of "see below" wording in encyclopedia articles, though I don't know if that's in the MOS. I'd like BaseballBugs to let us know why it's important to keep this image and information in the article.  Katr67 21:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair use images are supposed to be of inferior quality so as not to harm their author. Someone once put a "fact" tag on the statement that the fall was used on inspirational posters. The illustration serves as the citation. The overall point being that the waterfall is considered to be of above-average attractiveness. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 02:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, you're right about inferior quality, that's a good point. I also think it's a good idea to somehow note that the falls is "very" scenic, I'm just not sure this way (using posters as an example) is the best way. I'm fine with leaving it there for the time being, but hopefully one of us can think of a more "encyclopedic" way to make this point? -Pete 02:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am an amateur photographer and am willing to share better resolution pictures of the hike. This is my first time trying to contribute to wikipedia and not sure if I should add to the existing pictures or replace some of the existing ones with new photos. Bipingm (talk) 08:47, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent reversion and image 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved to Eagle Creek (Columbia River tributary). (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 02:51, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Eagle Creek (Multnomah County, Oregon) →  – According to the article itself, the creek is entirely in Hood River County, not Multnomah County. Normally, I'd consider this move uncontroversial and would just do it, but I see that the present title has been unchanged for 18 years. Am I missing something? Jmabel | Talk 00:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 February 2023
Talk:Ches McCartney

message: This guy was very well known throughout the southeast U.S., and was the subject of many newspaper articles over the years. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.136.195.89 (talk) 23:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Some of this information seems far-fetched.  Perhaps an edit is in order?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RealPandemonium (talk • contribs) 03:18, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Validity 
Talk:Lakeport Brewing Company

message: Article needs more sourcing... the one link provided is not viewable without subscription.  Preferably I'd like to see at least one additional source added.--Isotope23 16:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag

message: All of us here at Lakeport appreciate your loyalty and support.
Teresa Casioli
This daughter of a steelworker, former friend of the working class, apparently found money too great a draw, and, I feel, has thusly jeopardized the livelihood of the workers at Lakeport, for her own personal gain, with the sale of Lakeport to Labatt.
--Mark Alfred 19:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teresa Casioli's "loyalty" 
Category talk:Guipuscoa

message: If Guipuscoa is the traditional name of this province in English, I think we could use it for the category and all the articles concerning this territory instead of using the Basque or the Spanish name. The same in the case of Biscay where you cand find the category which uses the Basque name and a subcategory using the Spanish one. Manu bcn 16:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I find it accurate, It is the usual policy, isn´t it?. Anyway, I think that English speaker Wikipedists should confirm us that it is the usual English form. The same for Biscay and any other location with an English form, as Seville, Andalusia or Castile. --Garcilaso 10:28, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Chrétien DuBois

message: Since so little seems to be known about Chretien, and he appears to be mostly of interest to those descended from his immigrant children, I am not sure he merits an article in Wikipedia. I would suggest this information could all be folded into the article on Louis DuBois.11 Arlington (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Combine with other article?

message: Although Chretien DuBois himself was not an American settler, he is notable as the key European connection to an extensive tree of hundreds of DuBois descendants in the United States. This is exemplified by the existence of the DuBois Family Association and is well documented in the publication The American Descendants of Chretien DuBois. The American Descendants of Chrétien Du Bois of Wicres, France Part One, William Heidgerd, The DuBois Family Association, Huguenot Historical Society Inc., New Palz, NY, 1968, A-3.----Tvbanfield (talk) 21:47, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Chris Eliopoulos

message: Added the Harvey award from 2008.
source: http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=18247
--24.187.77.211 (talk) 13:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated awards 

message: He's posted his comic on his website now. Should we add it as a link?
http://www.miserylovessherman.com/2008/09/11/911/
--24.187.77.211 (talk) 00:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to his 9/11 comic 