lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Historical archive/Template:Totally-disputed

message: Dude! That's like, so totally disputed! Martin 22:36, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Like, yeah, and stuff! Chris Roy 08:36, 10 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed, like TOTALLY, man

message: 
How about this:

Wow.... It's great to see SOME humor on Wikipedia.
That gave me the best laugh that I've had in a long time.  :-)! Nimrand 18:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Box

message: How about this image, . It is somewhat alarming without implying that the reader should "stop". —Centrx→talk • 07:18, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd prefer :Image:Unbalanced scales.svg since this template is about a lack of neutrality (which does not even have basis). --Cat out 03:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted that change, since this template is also about a possible lack of factual accuracy (which is a very serious problem) as well as lack of neutrality. Polonium 01:08, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: The new color for this template seems particularly bright.  I say we pick a new one. -- Clevelander 14:21, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Color

message: Sorry, but adding  or even  caused problems with  and even . Try energy economics for an example - it spat an error at the top of the page saying AFD must be substed - when AFD isn't even a template on the page. I know removing AFD isn't a good idea, but throwing obscure errors in place of article text seemed worse. --Geoffrey 18:15, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a template anyway, AfD was not the right place and it was moved to TfD, the correct process. —Centrx→talk • 23:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD 

message: This template serves no purpose other than to be more annoying than the  alert box. It should be deleted. --The Cunctator 15:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive 

message: Am I the only one who thinks that perhaps the exclamation cartoon should flank both sides of the template - In it's current form, there seems to be dead space. Wisdom89 (talk) 10:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictorial representation
Talk:Spreadsheet

message: In the article the paragraph "BATCH SPREADSHEET REPORT GENERATOR" states "In 1962 this concept of the spreadsheet, called BCL for Business Computer Language, was implemented on an IBM 1130". IBM 1130 was launched in 1965 ??? ( Wikipedia and IBM Documentation at Bitsavers ). Should it be an IBM 1620 ?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.197.228.130 (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent date / implementation computer for BCL 

message: Hi . Published sources exist for GEIS FAL. Issues of the Ohio CPA Journal from 1975, and Computer Digest from 1970, Interface Age from 1982. I can see this on Google Books snippet view. Also Page 129 of Loren Dunton, "The financial planner: a new professional--yesterday-today-tomorrow", Longman Financial Services Pub., 1986. Hard to add cites though since I don't have access to full text of the publications to check. But anyone who has the time to track down copies of these could add those cites. SJK (talk) 00:31, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Addendum. Apparently Ohio CPA Journal is on ProQuest. I don't have access to ProQuest, but maybe some one else does. SJK (talk) 00:37, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  GEIS FAL/TABOL 

message: Spreadsheet
Content of spreadsheet
#value: These are number inserted into cell.
#Label: These are word you enter to explain a value
#Formula: These are mathematical equation you enter into cell 102.89.47.254 (talk) 21:37, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not clear what changes to the article User:102.89.47.254 wants to discuss. Delete post?--Nø (talk) 07:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data processing/Computer 

message: What do you mean by A,B,C,D etc is a spreadsheet file 37.111.207.26 (talk) 15:14, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICT
Talk:Marquess of Anglesey

message: What are you using for your sources? Could you please cite them so others can look at them too? Also, Who's Who of Parliament lists Henry Paget (1821-1880), first son of the 2nd Marquess of Anglesey as an Earl of Uxbridge (Stenton, M. Who's Who of British Members of Parliament, Volume I 1832-1885. Hassocks: The Harvester Press Limited. 1976. p.388). I noticed you don't have him listed in the Earl of Uxbridge section. Any particular reason? (134.29.59.227 21:34, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Listing of Earls

message: I have removed the sentence " the Marquess defeated Napoleon after having lost his leg by amputation in the field.", as it is well known Uxbridge lost his leg at the end of the battle, never resumed command on that day and of course did not defeat Napoleon single-handely.93.21.171.222 (talk) 12:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong sentence 

message: : (refs omitted)
It appears from the chart that Lady Henrietta and her son Matthew are ahead of (4) for the barony. —Tamfang (talk) 00:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The text implies that the entire male line has to die out before the Barony can pass through the female line, which isn't the case. It's also wrong that Matthew Megarry is the senior female-line descendant: his mother is. If the current Marquess and (1) to (3) were to die, (4) would become Earl of Uxbridge but Lady Henrietta Megarry would become suo jure Baroness Paget. Proteus (Talk) 19:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  succession to the barony
Talk:Politics of Cameroon

message: Giving Cameroon's former name as French Cameroon totally ignores the fact that what is now Cameroon is a union of the UN Trust Territory of Southern Cameroons under British administration and the former UN Trust Territory of Cameroons under French administration, which gained independence in 1960 and took the name Republic of Cameroon (République du Cameroun). The present Republic of Cameroon cannot and should not be called a former French colony! Present Cameroon is a bilingual country made up of a former British "colony" and a former French "colony." The Germans founded a colony at the mouth of the Cameroon (Wouri) River in 1884 called Kamerun and lost it to Allied Expeditionary Forces during World War I. After the war, the colony was partitioned into British and French zones of influence.
: Feel free to change it!  You clearly have a good understanding of the colonial-era history of Cameroon. You're encouraged to use it to improve these pages. Molinari 23:51, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: "...and presidential elections in 1997. Because the government refused to consider opposition demands for an independent election commission, the three major opposition parties boycotted the October 1977 presidential election"
Should that be "...boycotted the October 1997 presidential election"? Molinari 23:48, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: From the article:
:"...and presidential elections in 1997. Because the government refused to consider opposition demands for an independent election commission, the three major opposition parties boycotted the October 1977 presidential election"
Should that be "...boycotted the October 1997 presidential election"? Molinari 23:48, 25 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Date is wrong?
Talk:Lorazepam

message: ativan is a a benzodiazepam, as is xanax, clonepin, temazepam and valium.
the classification error presented here appears in medical literature online and has made it, at YNHH, into medical jargon and paperwork 173.162.206.117 (talk) 03:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The very first sentence of the article is, "Lorazepam, sold under the brand name Ativan among others, is a benzodiazepine medication." (emphasis added) Where are you seeing that it says that Ativan/lorazepam is not a benzodiazipine? Vontheri (talk) 21:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  activan is a benzodiazepam, for instance 

message: As at end 2023 this medication is nowhere to be found in pharamacies or hospitals and there is a major holdup in production.  Recent increases in demand, manufacturing changes, and quality control issues have resulted in a shortage of injectable and oral lorazepam, prompting clinicians to use alternatives. Should this be discussed here? Or does it belong in some separate article on thew recent significant increases in mental health problems worldwide? Carusus (talk) 11:07, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Carusus As long as you have reliable sources to back up that information, then I see no reason why that shouldn't be included in this article. Vontheri (talk) 20:32, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Availability
Talk:Trowel

message: I'd like to hear some convincing reasoning on how these links are a detriment to the article, or I shall restore them in time. Sam Spade 23:33, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: External

message: I'm surprised there's no mention of Marshalltown, without which American archaeology would still be lost in the stone age.--Pooneil (talk) 15:45, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archaeology 

message: Anybody know about this trowel museum in Norfolk? I can't find out anything about it or the man reported to have founded it. 173.66.232.236 (talk) 16:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't find any reference to an Edward Welfare or a trowel museum anywhere, either, so I'm deleting that content. 67.212.23.195 (talk) 21:14, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trowel museum 

message: why is there a link to Wiktionary?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.170.59.252 (talk) 15:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiktionary
Talk:The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit

message: On the inital stub version of the article, there were two sentances that I found that didn't quite make sense:
*This premise is backed by the foundation of World Wars I and II.  
*the phrase, "the man in the gray flannel suit" was somewhat of a joke
Could the author of this page, or someone who understands what s/he was getting at, add these back in as substantive, clear pieces of info? --Alex S 23:50, 6 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Make sense

message: The into to the article characterizes TMITGFS as a novel, but then almost the whole article is about the movie.  Could some literary type write a novel summary?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.112.75.239 (talk) 13:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's because it needs to be split. -- 98.154.34.179 (talk) 08:06, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

text: Agree with the poster above.  The movie and the novel should have separate pages. TheBlinkster (talk) 05:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

text: The state of war per se ended in Europe during spring of 1945; but, allied forces occupied much of Europe for years afterward. It's not entirely incredible that the character in question could've been posted in Italy well into the summer before shipping out to what remained of the war in the Pacific.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.223.130.32 (talk) 04:30, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movie or novel 

message: I split the novel information off to The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit (novel) and made this page solely about the film.  This is the normal practice for other bestselling books that were made into films (for example, Wilson's A Summer Place). 
I am also thinking of moving this page to one entitled The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit (film).  Both the book and film were very popular so I don't think there is a good argument for the phrase defaulting to one or the other without the addition of (novel) or (film).  If anyone wants to discuss this, please do so here.TheBlinkster (talk) 06:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split off novel page
Talk:List of football clubs in England

message: It's a) Incomplete and b) Out-of-date. Will anyone attend to both of these points, or should this page be headed for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion? - fchd 07:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this page serve any useful purpose? 

message: I have filled up the missing levels of some of the lower non-league clubs for easier reference. --Siva1979Talk to me 12:27, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completed! 

message: This article needs to be either renamed or reformed. Welsh clubs are included, therefore I suggest a renaming to List of football clubs in England leagues. Otherwise, Welsh teams should be removed. I'm aware of the explanation in the first paragraph, but the title of this article is misleading and suggests Welsh teams are geographically located in England. Welshleprechaun 13:41, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Or better still merge all the articles together into List of football clubs in the United Kingdom. Failing that a little overlap in each article is perfectly fine unless you are of a certain extreme political persuasion. Owain (talk) 09:07, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: Is there a reason why the list of teams only covers those from the 1st to the 10th level in the league? Even if the teams in the lower leagues (11th to 20th level) are a part of regional feeder leagues, if they have the potential to be promoted to the 10th league or higher shouldn't they be listed in the article? Blahney (talk) 03:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of teams from 11th level and below
Talk:Robert Wright (British historian)

message: It looks like existing Wikipedia links to Robert Wright are talking about at least three different people:
* Robert Wright (historian) is the RAF historian and biographer of Hugh Dowding
* Robert Wright (politician) was an early 19th century congressman from Maryland
* Robert Wright (journalist) is a journalist and author of books popularizing sociobiology and game theory
I propose moving the current page to Robert Wright (historian), creating the other two Robert Wright pages, and leaving a disambiguation page at Robert Wright.  Does anyone object?  If not, I'll go ahead in a few days. Saucepan 00:13, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've split the page as described above. Saucepan 19:01, 17 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page moving and disambiguation
Talk:Timaru

message: The Phar Lap and Mars refs came from a Wikipedia search via Google. Most of the rest is off the top of my head. :robinp 01:06, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Advert or info guys !?! Smog is a problem people NEED to know about !
Do Auckland and Christchurch not pretend to have no smog on calm winter days ??
142.162.21.1 (talk) 11:20, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  no mention of smog ? 

message: Not a criticism, just wondering.
http://archive.stats.govt.nz/Census/2013-census/profile-and-summary-reports/quickstats-about-a-place.aspx?url=%2FCensus%2F2013-census%2Fprofile-and-summary-reports%2Fquickstats-about-a-place.aspx&request_value=14926&tabname=&sc_device=pdf
Avaiki (talk) 05:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  No population / demographics? 

message: Is there a source for the size of Timaru in the side bar?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hdert (talk • contribs) 05:40, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for size
Talk:Wrong direction

message: Wrong Direction
Post Hoc
--Taak 01:22, 7 Apr 2004 (UTC)

message: The following (2nd para) has no citation, and judging by google and snopes.com, there is unlikely to ever be one:
For instance, a tobacco company executive once suggested that cancer caused smoking as a matter of pain relief, to explain the high correlation between them.
Without a ref, it's one of those statements that really doesn't look good. Deleted. Centrepull (talk) 13:22, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apocrypha must go 

message: The name looks non-notable. The concept itself is an instance of correlation does not imply causation (see "reverse causation"). The article has one sentence plus a bunch of mediocre examples. --174.119.182.107 (talk) 02:22, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree.  Klbrain (talk) 15:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect/merge
Talk:List of tallest buildings

message: The Comcast innovation and technology center in Philadelphia, PA should be the last building on the list as it is 1 foot taller than one shenzhen building. It stands 1121 feet tall. 2601:197:B7F:FC90:9442:E19E:A4EB:D53C (talk) 20:07, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I likewise came here to ask why Philadelphia's Comcast Technology Center, which is 342 meters tall according to its article is not listed, while a building whose height is 341.7 meters is. The fact that nobody has responded to this section, which was added 98 days ago, makes me think people pay more attention to the article than the talk page. Perhaps I will be bold and add the CTC to the list. TypoBoy (talk) 21:28, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do the article is still incorrect and CTC should be listed 2601:197:B7F:FC90:BD8E:A9EF:B10:BB1E (talk) 20:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comcast Technology Center 

message: This article does not include the CN Tower, built in 1976 in Toronto, Canada, which was the tallest free-standing building from 1976 until 2007. 205.189.94.70 (talk) 23:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The CN Tower is not a building by the definition provided at the very top of the article:  You may be looking instead for List of tallest structures, linked at the top of the article, which does include the CN Tower. Tollens (talk) 09:43, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 February 2024 

message: Are Nikkei and the Economist not considered reliable sources? 2403:4A00:4000:0:0:0:1:2A (talk) 07:40, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hong Kong and Macau 

message: The intro to that page says: "(…) and a height of at least 340 metres (1,120 ft)."
But according to Skyscraper (and its sources) "Modern sources define skyscrapers as being at least 100 meters (330 ft) or 150 meters (490 ft) in height".
Can we change it? Qubkon (talk) 12:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the definition in the intro 

message: Egypt is building a 1000m skyscraper, Obelisco Capitale. It should be added to the list of tallest buildings under construction: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oblisco_Capitale Ecaml (talk) 08:35, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: I cannot find any sources stating that the building is actually under construction – it looks like it's so far just a proposal. If it is indeed under construction, please provide a source indicating that and I will be happy to add it to the list. Tollens (talk) 09:30, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 March 2024
Talk:Cowbridge

message: Placing this as a Start article as Cowbridge could be a very large article, and this is fairly small. FruitMonkey (talk) 09:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating 
Talk:Félix Faure

message: In the biography : "Félix François Faure was born in Bordeaux, " and on the right in the section personnal details "Born 30 January 1841 Paris, France" something is wrong.. In the french version of this article Felix Faure was born in Paris, France.
I don't know if i could modify, i will try and if i made a mistake please correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:660:500B:43:0:0:0:11 (talk) 06:42, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: place of birn

message: Is the cause of death confirmed or rumor?
I do not know anything about this matter, but the text is confusing.  Did he die _while_ seeing a prostitute?  _When_ makes it sound like he was walking down the street and, upon spying a prostitute, promptly dropped dead.
He died while making love with a girl generally qualified as "courtisane" in French I don't what will be OK in English "Escort girl" ?
Ericd 12:11, 21 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We watched a movie that said the journals were published in 2007.  Does anyone have any information?  I'm drawing a blank.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8804:1E80:16F0:D519:B312:49EA:BE32 (talk) 22:04, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memoirs or Journal 

message: His mistress published this in her memoirs:
(1898)
 October 16th. Félix Faure, during the last week, has been unusually mysterious in his ways. I know what he calls his "great scheme," but I have hardly thought him to be quite in earnest about it. Judging by his character I thought he would reconnoitre before attempting to achieve his aim. He has completely failed at the outset and he now admits it. Convinced that the French nation as a whole is thoroughly tired of the Dreyfus agitation, and that the hopelessly perturbed state of the country is a national calamity, he thought the only remedy to be a kind of coup d'état. His plan is, or rather was, this: With the assistance of the army—for he would obtain, or rely upon, the support of many prominent generals—Félix Faure wanted to make the Presidency independent of the Parliament, and establish a military Government.... A bold scheme, but one which was doomed to failure, for Félix Faure has not the necessary qualities, and there is no Augereau amongst his military friends, the present Parliament is quite unlike the Corps Legislatif of 1797, and the army cannot be compared in any way with the omnipotent soldiery of Bonaparte's days.
Is there anything to this? Something should gibe put in the article, if so. 2A00:23C7:E287:1900:51E0:D571:B988:25A2 (talk) 23:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Coup?
Talk:Hexapoda

message: Uh I know this is weird but this one page is consistently crashing Firefox 3.011 (on Windows XP) at my office. I haven't tried at home yet.
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.109.173.45 (talk) 18:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The hexapod group has been shown to be paraphyletic, with springtails having evolved independently of hexapods. The reference for this conclusion is as folllows:
Francesco Nardi, Giacomo Spinsanti, Jeffrey L. Boore, Antonio Carapelli, Romano Dallai & Francesco Frati (2003). Hexapod origins: monophyletic or paraphyletic?. Science 299: 1887–1889.
:This article needs updating. Pancrustacea is more up-to-date. As of August 2012, it seems not to be definitely settled but:
:*Traditional Crustacea is almost certainly paraphyletic with respect to hexapod groups (i.e. hexapods evolved from within crustaceans).
:*Traditional Hexapoda is probably not monomonophyletic (i.e. different groups of hexapods probably evolved separately from within crustaceans).
:Lots of references. A search in Google Scholar for "reciprocal paraphyly" is useful, since this term is often used to describe the Crustacea/Hexapoda relationship. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:54, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paraphyly of hexapoda 

message: Labium is called both "lower lip" and "upper lip" in the article. SyP (talk) 13:17, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  labium 

message: "The abdomen consists of eleven segments in all true insects (often reduced in number in many insect species)"
What does this even mean? Also, it isn't sourced.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.24.43.97 (talk) 23:54, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonsensical statement 