lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jaime Winstone

message: I was wondering if anyone could change the article name from Jamie Winstone to Jaime Winstone as the latter is actually how her name is spelt and how she is credited. Allie 19:32, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, we really need a definative source for the spelling. do you know of one? Amo 20:09, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

text: well, not all her IMDb stuff is credited as Jaime Winstone, or the title simply wouldn't be called that. Of the other two, i'm more inclined to trust the Storm profile, but i still don't find it definitive, like a proper acting CV would be. As for the telegraph article - it's just one example of her name being spelt that way. there are many for examples for both spellings. Does the briths, marriages and deaths index you referenced require registration? cos i couldn't find it online if it's not the registeration one. Amo 21:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change 

message: As NOTW is closing I thought it was a shame to let this interview go to waste - Original  Archived RaintheOne BAM 01:27, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Jan C. Ting

message: This guy is running to be a delegate in PA.  That means he must live in PA, right?  (Also is probably a registered Republican right now?) -KaJunl (talk) 12:24, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residence 
Talk:Jane Garvey (broadcaster)

message: A previous version of this article contained a copyright violation from the BBC's biography page. This has been removed from the article and should not be reincluded. Thryduulf 01:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright problems
Talk:David Lloyd George Elementary School

message: This page seems to have been written by a very young person and needs a good read-through and editing for style, grammar, and spelling.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.6.237.214 (talk) 06:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proofreading and Editing for Style 
Talk:Stanford Physics Information Retrieval System

message: This page is in need of an expansion, and individuals working - or studying - at Stanford University would be aptly placed to make contributions to the article.  I do not work or study at Stanford University so I will contribute to this article when I get time but it will be lower than the other articles on my priority list.  Cheers, Astrobayes 00:27, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand this Article
Talk:Janet Smith (judge)

message: There's a photo here - and it has Crown Copyright, so anyone can use it if for WP. Feel free to upload it someone (I'm busy). Malick78 (talk) 11:25, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:KOA

message: I took the liberty of reverting the edit made 4/22/09, as it was irrelevant. One group of unruly campers at one site during one weekend is not important enough for mention. Whateverlolawants (talk) 07:03, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to KOA. Consensus arrived at KOA as the title to move the article to on basis of primary topic and page views satisfying TLA move. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 13:27, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Kampgrounds of America →  – "KOA" seems to be the WP:COMMONNAME. Sources like this refer to the company as "KOA", not "Kampgrounds of America", and their website refers to them as just "KOA" as well. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:27, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Thoughts on the primary-topic question? Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I support moving it to just KOA, as it clearly seems to be the WP:PRIMARY topic and the only article that exactly uses the letters "KOA" in all caps without any other terms attached.   what do you say? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:13, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a little worried about ambiguity with the Japanese company and the radio station, and there is a general reluctance on Wikipedia to designate primary topics for TLAs, but the page views do show this topic as pretty dominant for "KOA". I do not object. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:19, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I agree that we rightly should have a very high threshold for any TLA being primary. I think this meets it though. -- Netoholic @ 20:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 November 2022 

message: — Assignment last updated by CSU ENG PROF (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: American Studies 101
Talk:Priming

message: These seem like two entirely different topics.  I agree with the idea of splitting it into a page on Priming as a psycology and media term and Priming as an agriculture term.
By the way, Malcolm Gladwell's Blink has a chapter discussing various priming experiments.
----
I agree with the splitting this are two seperate subjects.
----
I also agree agriculture should definatley be split from the psychology section
----
NOTE: As a courtesy for other editors, kindly observe Wikipedia guidelines and sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added. For further info see: Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Wikiborg 23:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, with both the signing comment and the disambiguation. However, this already short article may suffer from the split, and I think should be expanded upon before disamiguated. Totalirrelevance 13:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be split. But it will create stubs that need to be filled. --Comaze 01:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jason de la Peña

message: Judging by his captions on Sky News the other night, he now uses "de la Pena", without a circumflex. However, he definitely had the accent in his playing days, so I'm leaving the article title alone, especially as a redirect from the non-accented name already exists. Loganberry (Talk) 22:40, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Mini Image

message: Isn't there a space between mini and image?--Taida 00:29, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think you understood what I meant. I meant to say that this article should be renamed to Mini Image instead of MiniImage because people usually say Mini Image. I've actually never heard anyone say Miniimage before. Miniimage sounds confusing.--Taida 20:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tehom

message: The word tehom is not cognate to Tiamat according to the majority view that Tiamat is from Sumerian meaning mother of life while tehom is from the Semitic root t-h-m found also in Ugaritic meaning the ocean. It is cognate to Akkadian tamtu which is NOT another name for Tiamat, in fact not a name at all but again simply the word for ocean. Please stop cranky "Bible-is-derived-from-paganism" innuendo POV edits in this regard. The tehom = Tiamat claim is a well known error thoroughly discussed and dismissed already in the 1930s, see The Language of the Pentateuch in its Relation to Egyptian by A.S. Yahuda, Oxford University Press, 1933. Kuratowski's Ghost (talk) 03:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately for Mr Yahuda, his views haven't left any impression on later scholarship :) PiCo (talk) 06:17, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not true at all, his work is still regularly cited. Kuratowski's Ghost (talk) 11:46, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  In this humble editor's view, the controversy above should be made explicit but inconclusive in the article itself. Simply declaring that an error is 'well known' or that someone's work is 'regularly cited' is dangerously close to weasel-wording, and it strikes us that making rigid, clear pronouncements about the meaning of ancient words is an exercise in folly. 70.89.20.65 (talk) 18:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cognates
Talk:Goodput

message: DrBob127 00:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Reference: Arora, R.M., "TCP/IP Networks with ECN over AQM", Master's Thesis, Carleton University, April 2003, Section 2.3.3 & 2.3.4DrBob127 00:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I always thought wikipedia had a policy against neologisms. 212.213.204.99 09:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The manual of style does caution against them: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_neologisms#Articles_on_neologisms Merreborn (talk) 22:55, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  What? Goodput is a widespread term in the computer networkning literature. Mange01 (talk) 17:26, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neologism?
Talk:Belief system

message: I redirected this article to religion because it was a weird, out of date fork of that article, with American Dream thrown in.  If this article is going to be re-created, it should leave detailed discussion of religion to that article and not simply copy most of its content.  Feel free to cross-reference non-religious belief systems from there, as appropriate. 
-- Beland 00:42, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a bit of a problem with the redirect to religion. All religions are belief systems,  but not all belief systems are religions, e.g. communism. This article should briefly list all belief systems apart from all the religions. This article should not digres on religion. Andries 12:35, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect to religion

message: WP:Disambiguation is for when a term refers to more than one topic (e.g. Nail (fastener) and Nail (anatomy)), which is not the case here.  This would be better as a short article rather than a dab page - i.e. something like:
"A belief system is a set of mutually supportive beliefs.  The beliefs may be religious, philosophical, ideological or a combination of these.  See also Life stance, World view." DexDor (talk) 06:21, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed this into a normal article - anyone like to improve on the wording ? DexDor (talk) 21:18, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change from dab to (short) article ? 

message: I believe Stephen Law's comment is a nice antidote to the New Religious movement tolerance, such as that cults are really sucker-suck-up-s-movements, but there must also be sane belief systems, such as for example ethics of reciprocity, science and some well-behaved religions. I think the topic deserves its article, only just larger and more extensive. Rursus dixit. (mbork3!) 11:12, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is very relevant and the article is disappointing because it is based on a single source (Glover) and does not include science as a belief system. Knowledge beliefs try to find evidence and justification that support the beliefs. Science is a good example of how belief systems work. Otherwise to leave science out, it would be misleading and rather cynical to suggest that people build belief systems and yet can think of no supporting evidence. Beyenklu (talk) 18:19, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: There must be more to this

message: Why did this article suddenly become an article about Mr Glover? — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 12:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Right that's why I've tagged it for merge, more or less as is into a § in the parent topic article. I'm afraid any attempt to do anything here will run aground on the reef of OR or a vulgarization of content in other articles such as epistemology, ontology, doxastic attitudes, etc. 108.183.102.223 (talk) 08:51, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glover
Talk:Jason Smith (baseball)

message: Baseball Reference lists only a "Jason William Smith," who has some things in common with the "Jason Edward Smith" in this article, but significant differences, too. I simply can't tell whether they are the same person or two different people, and if they are two people, how much information in this article is correct.  Jorgath (talk) 22:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite Check Explanation
Talk:Jason Smith (basketball, born 1974)

message: Jason smith has not been signed by the dragons... yet  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.250.6.244 (talk) 05:37, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arkansas Twister

message: I saw this claim in the article: "It is also one of the few coasters to take riders out of the station and directly into the lift hill." and I removed it since most all roller coasters do this anyway making this claim untrue based on the way it was written.   Sawblade05  (talk to me | my wiki life) 05:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Claim that I removed 
Talk:Big Night

message: --72.59.62.92 00:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Although I am entirely unsourced, my religion indicates that this is a movie of how we play a part nowadays in Jesus' last days. The symoblism is clear from there, as there are several references of God, hell, betrayal of Jesus, etc., and of how at the end the omelette represents Easter because of the eggs. I know there is no source, but once you see it, you can't unsee it. Someone find a direct reference to this correlation, please. --Arathun (talk) 22:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration of 

message: He cooks a Frittata, not an omelette MrMaxP (talk) 00:32, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omelet
Talk:David Galula

message: You sure Pacification in Algeria was ever Classified? I can't find any such reference at RAND or anywhere else. - Mark Peppers
I believe, although can't find a confirming source online, that it was the Counterinsurgency manual that was classified until recently, not "Pacification in Algeria."
Does anybody know, was David Galula Jewish?  I know of French Algerian Jews with that last name, but that's not conclusive.
: Galula was fired from the Army because of the Jewish laws of Vichy, but I have no sources as to his religious convictions. Rama (talk) 15:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classified?
Talk:Jack Rabbit (Seabreeze)

message: I edited the text, but did not change the date (1921) from the previous version, though I see the discrepency between that and the 1920 date from rcdb.  Someone feel like calling Seabreeze and asking?  dm 03:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Seabreeze web site itself says 1920.  .  Powers T 15:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opened in 1920 or 1921 

message: This thing does not go 50 and it does not handle more riders per hour that the Superman. Daniel Christensen (talk) 04:03, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Stats
Talk:Jay Parini

message: This article is missing citations.  I added the template indicating that it requires citations to reliable sources for verification of its content.  See the links in WP:BLP. --NYScholar 11:28, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The lack of reliable sources for this page is appalling, considering the claims made.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 22:27, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing citations

message: In the "Works" section, please change "esus: The Human Face of God (2013) biography" to "Jesus: The Human Face of God (2013) biography" because that is the proper title of this biography.
Nick Spengler (talk) 21:50, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 22:26, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

text: Already done Cannolis (talk) 01:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 September 2014 
Talk:Jayadeva Uyangoda

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.kulturstudier.com/jayadeva-uyangoda and http://www.loc.gov/bicentennial/bios/democracy/bios_uyangoda.html and http://www.cjpdonline.org/cj/en/page/31/Our%20Contributors. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 22:09, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Hades 360

message: the higest rollercoaster?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by The real rj (talk • contribs) 06:11, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  hades  

message: Shouldn't we name it "Hades 360°", because that is what it says on the advert? Xtreme2000 (talk) 21:00, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: All the sources I've found, URC, FB Announcement, and Coaster Critc, don't have the degree symbol in the wording,--Astros4477 (talk) 21:15, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename the page

message: There have been numerous edits to the speed of this coaster. Apparently the Mt. Olympus website claims a speed of 70 mph. Park websites are known for boastful statistics and are notoriously inaccurate. Achieving 70 mph from a 140-foot drop is not possible on a wooden coaster. In order to reach 70 mph the coaster would need a very steep drop of at least 160 feet.—JlACEer (talk) 20:03, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  speed
Talk:Scorched 3D

message: I added a source to the quote (you can see it when you edit the page) but I couldn't get it to work. Someone with better knowledge on this, please fix it? SmartSped 00:32, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. When you use a <ref> tag, you also need a  tag so the references have somewhere to go. See Help:Footnotes. Nifboy 16:32, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken source 

message: Rather than just diving into illustrating various details of the gameplay, perhaps this article should focus more on explaining the context of these projects?
The article, and particularly the weapon summary, doesn't seem to even distinguish between gameplay aspects from the normal mode and the apocalypse mod.
Wouldn't it be a lot more concise to first explain that the core mode generally deviates minimally from the original scorched 3d while the apocalypse mod takes a lot more liberties in adding original aspects to it?
And it should say how many mods and game modes are included, and perhaps whether they're from the same team or more seperate projects. Undeaf (talk) 23:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can make that section make more sense, please do. Nifboy (talk) 01:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, but I don't actually have experience with the most recent versions. Undeaf (talk) 21:37, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

text: This is especially an issue because the apocalypse mod has been changing significantly in each version.Undeaf (talk) 22:00, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary of game modes? 

message: The official website seems to indicate the name is Scorched3D, without a space between the Scorched and 3D. Brenton (contribs · email · talk · uploads) 08:38, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't the name Scorched3D?
Talk:Piano Sonata No. 25 (Beethoven)

message: I dispute that this is called 'Cuckoo'. I have listened to several complete recordings of Beethoven's piano sonatas, read about them, own the scores and have been interested in them for a few years, and have never heard of it being called that except on this website. I don't think the name, if used, is widely enough used to warrant the nickname being given anywhere prominent. 20:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its certainly not a universally used nickname by any means.  Though, I did find one place that uses it: allmusic.com.  That's not the most rigorous of sources, though.  Anyone find it in print?  DavidRF (talk) 21:41, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I too have never seen that anywhere other than here.  I am going to remove it from the Beethoven works page.  Asmeurer (talk  ♬ contribs) 17:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

text: I've seen the nickname occasionally as well.  Might be worth mentioning somewhere but leaving it out of the template.--DavidRF (talk) 19:13, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickame?

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Piano Sonata No. 1 (Beethoven) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 13:16, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Note the date of the foregoing notice. The discussion, now long closed, concerned whether to move the sonata articles to new titles incorporating opus numbers. The conclusion was not to do so. Drhoehl (talk) 23:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Piano Sonata No. 15 (Beethoven)

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Piano Sonata No. 1 (Beethoven) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 13:16, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Note the date of the foregoing notice. The discussion, now long closed, concerned whether to move the sonata articles to new titles incorporating opus numbers. The conclusion was not to do so. Drhoehl (talk) 23:34, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: the prophet's wives 2A01:4C8:B2:A5CD:1:2:D95F:BA51 (talk) 05:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  in-place-discovery