lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Window in the Skies

message: Shouldn't this be marked for deletion?  We don't need to give every single song in the world it's own wikipage.  And even if we did, we can't post the lyrics so the would all be meaningless stubs. -WarthogDemon 04:44, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, but for most bands, there are pages for most of their singles, and Window in the Skies is set to be released as the second single for U218, the first being The Saints are Coming, which is already released- DE
There seems to have been a lot to discuss about many songs, for most U2 songs have their own pages, and not that many are stubs.
Phillies26 14:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD 

message: Correct me if im wrong, but i understand the song title to be Window on the Skies, as per this.... http://i103.photobucket.com/albums/m137/spinner35/U218.jpg (bottom of the left list)--IanRitchie 21:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Window On the Skies 

message: Is it true that Kite (Live) is going to be on there, because I thought it was confirmed that Zoo Station (Live) and Miss Sarajevo (Live) along with Tower of Song were the b-sides, but Miss Sarajevo has been replaced by Kite... are there citations on this?
: http://www.u2.com/highlights/?hid=329
The tracks for all of them straight from U2.com. Phillies26 00:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracklisting 

message: Why is there a citation on the part where it says that 'Window In the Sky' is said at the end. For anyone who has heard the song (they are playing it all the time on Virgin Radio and other Radio Stations) it is in fact true. Koolgiy 03:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added that citation.  It was intended to be a citation needed for when it said "it was previosuly called 'Oh Can't You See' by fans." I have readded that citation needed in a more appropriate place.MelicansMatkin 23:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes,  tag should remain, if not cited soon, we can remove the statement. Wikipedia should not be based on overheard fan rumours. and i am not sure that statement is that notable anyway even if it can be cited. --Merbabu 23:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 

message: removed the link to the video of the song stating: "rv - that video is also copyrighted". No one denies that it isn't copyrighted, otherwise we should remove almost ALL external links. U2 has released the video for viewing on Youtube so what would be the problem in linking to it? feydey 15:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video for the song link 

message: It appears that there's a new/old? video out for this song... featuring montages of old pictures of the band along with surreal imagery (flying buildings, etc.) -- all in black & white.  Is this a new video or old, and should it be mentioned along with the "artists montage" video? Amnewsboy 08:49, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video #2 

message: --86.143.186.183 09:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this song about?
Talk:Paul Buchheit

message: I was a little unsure whether or not to AfD this article, but since he is the principal architect of Gmail the chances are pretty high that he's notable, and besides there are some references cited. However, it does need a bit of tidy up in this respect: there is no indication of which of the cited sources correspond to which facts. Page numbers in the books cited would also be useful, for instance. I see that one of the sources cites some page numbers; this may also be appropriate for the other. Snthdiueoa (talk) 12:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Website design and Google ads 2402:3A80:1CD1:F2B3:E49E:52D8:A24E:C5AF (talk) 20:07, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Web site and Google ads
Talk:Edward Durrel Stone, Jr.

message: I am contesting that this page be deleted for not asserting the person's importance. Edward Stone is a leading landscape architect in the world today. His reception of the ASLA Medal alone should make him significant because only the most elite architects receive them. His work has been especially important to cities and tourism throughout Florida, the Caribbean, and even Europe. He has been practicing in the field for over 46 years and has built one of the top ten most successful and renown firms as seen in an issue of Landscape Architecture, i do not remember which at the time. Some information like this has been left out for now because i understand he is a living person and that Wikipedia has restrictions on information  that can be included about personal success, income, or promotion. His importance mey not seem as significant because I am trying to use NPOV. If there is some way i can include this information or change the wording of my writing to assert his importance, i would like to know and be given the chance. I am not exactly sure what you are looking for, for this is my first Wikipedia entry.   
                                            Tkokenge 04:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion

message: This should be merged with Edward Durrell Stone, Jr..  They are substantially the same article, although one is spelled wrong.Montco 02:34, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: merge
Talk:Minot's Ledge Light

message: This article contradicts itself... In the first paragraph it says that the original lighthouse existed for only a "few" months, and later in the article it goes on to  say that the original structure existed for 16 months. 
Also, as a lifelong citizen of Scituate, I can say that the lighthouse is off of Scituate. For further information, contact David Ball c/o The Scituate Historical Society. --Chris 04:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: it repeats everything in the first section. it is taken directly from we us government site. it needs to be deleted and important information from it should be inserted into the other sections. if it weren't for that section the article would be much better. --Tainter 02:19, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  historical section
Talk:Chanyuan Treaty

message: Some older English sources used in this article spell “Khitan” as “Kitan.” They also seem to name the Liao state the “Khitan” state, conflating the state’s allies with its rulers. Either that, or the Khitan had their own “emperor” who is not clearly distinguished from the Liao emperor. I wish someone with expert knowledge of this era of Chinese history would intervene and clarify this, and perhaps clear up the inconsistent romanizations of Chinese names. — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 12:45, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Liao”, “Khitan”, and “Kitan” 

message: The article Westphalian system about the modern concept of state sovereignty in the West points to this (much earlier) treaty as having comparable significance for China and all of East Asia. But this article does little to indicate that the Treaty of Chanyuan was significant except as an episode between two large states. Y’all, please help promote the treaty’s significance by editing the lede. 
I edited one section to indicate that the two imperial families were now addressing each other on equal terms (and this was politically significant, not just a matter of etiquette). But this article hides all indications that this treaty was a turning point in Chinese history, burying them at the tail ends of the last two sections. Most readers will stop reading by then. — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 13:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article buries the lede
Talk:Algerian National Movement

message: Does this qualify as a "stub"? It's a short article, but is on what looks to be a complicated topic that could take a good deal of research to be sure of accuracy. Kennard2 04:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: This article, in its actual form, is clearly biased and probably written by an FLN supporter...
It implies that the MNA was no genuine nationalist mouvement, that it was only created as a revenge by Messali Hadj with support from France.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.127.52.67 (talk) 19:07, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased article
Talk:Interstate 10 in Arizona

message: About the blue clean up tag it is too hard for us to fix even with an account. The junctions closed needs to be highlight with pale yellow color because that's the standar for intersections temporairly closed. The rest area can be color light blue instead of dark blue, and why does those text have to be green words for. Whoever made this exit lists needs to manage a way to fix it. I can only do it up to here.Freewayguy 01:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh?  You aren't supposed to use colors at all, see WP:ELG.  --Holderca1 talk 14:20, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: About the Exit Lists

message: Given all the facts in this entry/article, I expected a lot more inline citations, sources, and references - - - and I think there should be.  There are entire paragraphs & sections with no inline citations to support the "facts" given.
There are also a couple of places where personal opinion is given and none have inline citations, sources, references to back it up.
In short, I think this entry/article needs work in the area of verification. 2600:8800:786:A300:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 00:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources & references 

message: The interchange of Fairway Dr. (exit 130) may be open now. Freeway cameras show cars and trucks driving on the entrance and exit ramps. This camera view can be accessed on ADOT's traffic map. Have a look!
Nebulous2357 (talk) 17:49, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fairway Dr. interchange
Talk:Interstate 75 in Michigan

message: 'The Chrysler Freeway jogs through the suburb of Hazel Park, site of the "worst freeway for accidents in Metro Detroit" at a curve near 9 Mile Road.'
Sure its a fun fact the MLive dug up in 2010, but that segment of freeway has been reconfigured since then and doubtfully still applies. KelleyCook (talk) 19:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Nine Mile curve
Talk:Ghost River Wilderness Area

message: Wynona Earp TV show was filmed at least partly in this location. No idea how to edit the page, so hopefully someone else can make the note and links.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.58.93.169 (talk) 00:35, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filming Location
Talk:Maculelê (stick dance)

message: Thanks for the move (Maculele (dance) to Maculelê (dance)); however, I don't think the "(dance)" is necessary, as there is nothing else by the name Maculelê. Can someone fix this? Thanks... --Cotoco 05:01, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I just noticed that the basque word for a stick (similar to the one used in Maculele) is called Makila anyone else wonder if there is a comment root in the entymology? Perhaps one gave the name to the other?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.202.165.152 (talk) 00:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible origin of the name 

message: The May 7 edit to pull the line about sparks puzzles me -- I've seen maculelê played with machetes and sparks definitely fly. Since the only explanation given for the edit is "that isn't how real life happens" I'd like to change it back to read: 
"The sounds of the knives striking one another, and the showers of sparks that are formed, make this performance particularly impressive. "  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.103.26.19 (talk) 19:11, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sparks
Talk:List of fire stations in Hong Kong

message: Could someone who is a fireman or is linked to the FSD help me on this? - jlao 04 05:04, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Help!

message: I moved this article to where it is now, but I didn't realise it was deleted before. Let's see if it can be improved now... typhoonchaser 12:41, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted before
Talk:I Love New York (TV series)

message: Just wanted to say thanks to the person who included all the references and links for the cast members. I found them to be very interesting and as did many other loyal ILNY fans.
I never knew about all the cast's past acting, thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.241.46.108 (talk) 20:00, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good references

message: Improvement of this article?  Here's an improvement:
Get rid of it.
How can Wikipedia's editors possibly pretend that tripe like this belongs in Wikipedia?  Perhaps I am too old (I was born in the 1950s; a baby-boomer), but it is beyond my comprehension that this kind of nonsense belongs in a so-called "encyclopedia" alongside articles about nuclear fusion, crossover elasticity, or the Kentish plover.
Can you imagine the respected "Encyclopedia Britannica" containing an entry like this detailing a so-called "reality" (again, I am gagging) television show?  Details, as if this were some legitimate academic treatise?  I cringe.
Please, Wikipedia, delete this twaddle !
Please !
Otherwise you have no right to claim any sense of legitimacy as an encyclopedia.--Atikokan (talk) 07:45, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:AFD. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:23, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia, please delete this ... um ... "article?" 
Talk:Cyanogen bromide

message: it seems that getting cyanamides from amines, works with tertiary amines too. but only with non-cyclic ligands. http://acta.chem-soc.si/52/52-1-80.pdf Sadorkan (talk) 11:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organic synthesis 

message: Materials from German Wikipedia article :de:Trimerisation - Mountainninja (talk) 23:09, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  cyclotrimerization of CNBr
Talk:Elwood Thomas Baker

message: [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Elwood+T.+Baker%22+rummy&btnG=Search+Archives&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&um=1 There are sources out there that seem to verify the claim-to-fame, but I don't see much else worthy of a whole biography. Perhaps a merge is in order? — Scientizzle 17:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs sources...maybe a merge?
Talk:James Corner

message: I am a student at Washington State University and this page is part of an assignment for my Landscape History class. We were given a list of Landscape Architects to research and write on. We are supposed to write up the information we find and post it on Wikipedia. This article is relevant because it is about an influential designer and theorist who is part of many contemporary works today Curls420 05:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please mention to your instructor and the other students that Wikipedia articles need references and need to demonstrate their subject's notability. Take a look at how the article has been expanded since you began it to get a better idea of what a Wikipedia article should be like. See also WP:BIO. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 05:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Student assignment
Talk:Fernando E. Rodríguez Vargas

message: On September 28, 2008, Rodriguez Vargas published in the "Journal of the American Medical Association" his findings in the effectiveness of Iodine and other chemical agents as disinfectants of the mucous membranes of the mouth.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.84.231.245 (talk) 19:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sept 28th 2008 ???  This date makes no sense.  How is it that he publishes in the future?  How is it that he publishes after his death?
Talk:Iqbal (film)

message: The IMDb page gives story credit to Vipul K. Rawal, but the article mentions Nagesh Kukunoor only. Any other sources to verify the real credits?  Jay (Talk) 08:09, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story credit 

message: The film needs more reviews. I have added a review from Hindustan Times. It would be helpful if editors add more reviews to the film. We are the Great (talk) 21:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Talk:Kunigami District, Okinawa

message: The map is unclear--which color indicates Kunigami District? This should be clarified. 173.89.236.187 (talk) 03:07, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 04:18, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

text: That's not a district, that's the city of Nago, Okinawa. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 21:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Map is unclear
Talk:Majoritarian

message: I am no expert on the subject and I dont have much time, but this obviously needs attention.. If anyone else wants to take care of it..--24.221.187.19 06:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This term is nearly synanomous with Plurality voting system, I can see no difference in the two explanation unless we find some scholarly source distinguising the terms.SADADS (talk) 14:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Ishigaki Island

message: The area of the city (island?) as listed here conflicts with the area of the island listed on the Japanese Wikipedia by about six square kilometers. Anyone have a source to cite? Dekimasuよ! 00:26, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was moved, since there are no objections to the proposal. Abecedare (talk) 09:43, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ishigaki → Ishigaki Island — Ishigaki may means Ishigaki City. ChongDae (talk) 03:07, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Minamidaitōjima

message: ‘The 660 (as of June 1, 2013) inhabitants live in a village in the center of the island.‘
This sentence can be seen in Kitadaitōjima article as well. Moreover, the population should be higher, according to Daitō Islands. Farru ES (talk) 07:28, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, I've fixed it using 2010 census data (the most recent one available as of this edit, they'll publish the results of the 2015 census sometime this year) from the [www.e-stat.go.jp] site. Gnipahellir (talk) 18:26, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population?
Talk:Tomigusuku, Okinawa

message: Which district did the village of Tomimgusuku belong before elevating to city status a decade ago? jlog3000 (talk) 21:41, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which [[Districts of Japan|district]] did [[Tomigusuku, Okinawa|Tomimgusuku]] belong? 

message: The listed coordinates generate a point in the ocean south of the island, according to . Somebody should investigate this.--Spray787 (talk) 05:03, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates appear to be incorrect
Talk:Uruma

message: The following passeage, added by  was removed.
:In the Japanese language the name of the city is written using hiragana syllabary instead of kanji characters. The word uruma is typically rendered in kanji as ; at the time of the formation of the city of Uruma, however, kanji usage was not adopted.
No corresponding statement was found in the source cited. --Nanshu (talk) 16:26, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. I did find it here, however, on the website of the 具志川市・石川市・勝連町・与那城町合併協議会 (http://www.city.uruma.lg.jp/h-gappei/html/topics_meishou01.html). "名称: 検討委員会からの選定理由. 珊瑚の島という意味で沖縄の美称である。また、景観の見事な沖縄の島々を示す言葉で、この４市町の海に面した素晴らしい景観を表し、新市が未来へ飛躍することと、美しい沖縄（４市町）の心を世界に発信することをすることを願う。「ひらがな」であることから子供たちにも親しみやすい。" A bit more explanation at (http://www.city.uruma.lg.jp/3/2764.html).Prburley (talk) 17:44, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The second link (from the Uruma City website) explicitly states: 書籍・文献等を調べたところ、漢字での表記は「宇流麻」とあり琉球の古称ということですが実際にこの漢字が使われていたかは不明です。This should be in the article. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 21:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. If you really think that the choice of hiragana is worth mentioning, do it with the new source. FYI, the text of the Omoidegusa can be found here. You can see that Uruma is written in hiragana. --Nanshu (talk) 15:27, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 22:30, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Yonaguni, Okinawa

message: "Due to this it is attempting to establish closer relations with Taiwan, including attempting to set up easier access to and from cities in Taiwan, with irregular service to Hualien already established. Further cooperation has been opposed by the central government, thus the lack of further progress."
Is this supposed to refer to transportation? If so it seems not to be true. If it refers to some other kind of service, that needs to be clarified. — Hippietrail (talk) 08:48, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irregular services to Hualian 
Talk:Amanohashidate

message: This article links to Japan's Ministry of the Environment, but the text for the link is shown as Environmental Agency. Suggest revising text to 'Ministry of the Environment' or possibly 'Japan's environmental agency' if this is a common way to generalize references to government agencies of which the naming may vary from country to country.  Any thoughts? Fujisanda (talk) 22:22, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  References to governmental agencies
Talk:Chion-in

message: I get that this is in Japan, but where?  And, while there are some obvious contextual clues, it doesn't explicitly say it is in Japan until the third section.  I feel as though this would all be appropriate information for the first sentence.  Thoughts?  CharacterZero | Speak 18:28, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the location to the first sentence. Thanks for your advice. --Sushiya 21:58, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism/Todo

message: Should we, in addition to Requests, Translate, etc... have a Defend section for perrenial hot-button issues (Jerusalem would probably be permanantly on this list) that need backing on the talk page or in curbing edit wars? Valley2city 06:22, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No. See WP:CANVASS. Please don't behave like the Eastern Europeans, whatever the Arabs may do. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:53, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Defend''' topic 

message: I tried adding this request to the WikiProject_Judaism/Todo page, but it won't save there.  Instead, it keeps saving my addition to the WikiProject_Judaism/Todo2 page.  I have no idea why or how.
Book of Ezekiel - Why is there no discussion of some of the most famous and perplexing passages in the entire Hebrew Bible? Ezekiel complained about people burning their children to death. "And you took your sons and your daughters, whom you had borne to me, and these you sacrificed to them to be devoured. Were your harlotries so small a matter that you slaughtered my children and delivered them up as an offering by fire to them?" (Ezek. 16:20-21.)  The Book of Ezekiel then states that God purposely gave bad laws which discouraged life and, by some interpretations, these laws led the people to believe that they should offer gifts of their first born by fire. This contradicts the text of the Torah as we know it, and all of Jewish and Christian interpretation of it. Nonetheless, Ezekiel talks about this as a point of view apparently accepted as truthful by at least some major segment of the population. See the discussion page for my start on this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.20.50.75 (talk) 03:05, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cannot add to this "Todo" page?