Talk:Steamboat Willie

message: Half of the sources I look at say that today is the 80th anniversary of Steamboat Willie, but the other half are saying it's November 18th. Which is it? 67.186.163.48 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:46, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: July 29th or November 18th?

message: This article still contains WP:OR and lack of Referencing issues. Multiple subsections have zero cites whatsoever, and some such as Controversies and Copyright have entire paragraphs with no reference information to back them up. Cirt (talk) 14:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Referencing and OR issues

message: The section on Copyright Status says "Disney later threatened to sue a Georgetown University law student who wrote a paper confirming Brown's claims". However, none of the citations on that section seem to back that up. They're only links to the research papers. In a brief Google search, I couldn't find an independent source to backup this sentence.  Hardburn (talk) 14:01, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Threaten to Sue?

message: The article states "The title of the film is a parody of the Buster Keaton film Steamboat Bill, Jr. (1928)" and has a citation ([4] as I write this), but that citation itself doesn't mention Steamboat Bill Jr. at all.
The Steamboat Bill, Jr. article cites a different source for this supposed connection (Uytdewilligen, Ryan (2016). The 101 Most Influential Coming-of-age Movies. Algora Publishing. pp. 17–18. ISBN 978-1-62894-194-4.) which can be viewed here (link), but that source just makes a throwaway claim that the Keaton film was the inspiration but appears to not support that conclusion with any citations of its own. Ergo, I am updating the article to replace the irrelevant citation with the one in the Keaton film article and altering the text to replace "is" with "may be" as follows: "The title of the film may be a parody of the Buster Keaton film Steamboat Bill, Jr. (1928),[4] itself a reference to the song by Collins."
MrNeutronSF (talk) 04:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steamboat Bill Jr. citation 

message: This is wrong the first cartoon with sound is song car tunes by Max fleischers  studios of inkwell in 1926 steamboat willie if the first one with music not sound 216.30.159.109 (talk) 16:01, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong 

message: That was LA Times' opinion, not the reason for the opposition. Anyone who calls LA Times unbiased is either delusional or just lying.
> Republican lawmakers have vowed to oppose any future attempt to extend the copyright term. Legal experts noted that later versions of Mickey Mouse created after Steamboat Willie will remain copyrighted, and Disney's recent use of the Steamboat Willie version as a logo in its modern movies may allow them to claim protection for the 1928 version under trademark law, as active trademarks can be renewed in perpetuity (so long as the owner can prove using it).
This is an UNBIASED version of the same statement, and has the minimum of changes necessary. This should serve as a Biase Objection or whatever the Hell you people call it when you've allowed your personal hatred to poison an article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.10.163.44 (talk) 00:14, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  #Republican_opposition_to_future_extension 

message: So, who will do the honors to upload Steamboat Willie on Wikimedia Commons, next New Year's Day? 2804:14D:8084:9693:E088:80CC:B327:D131 (talk) 20:28, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, please. No copyright exceptions for the Disney Company. 91.32.179.16 (talk) 15:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: they would have to have it done back in 2018-2017 to extend copyright another 20 years Slinkyw (talk) 00:32, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

text: I might be able to find an high quality video of the whole cartoon on YouTube that we can upload here on January 1, as long as it does not have too much imperfections and dust and dirt. Got to make sure Mickey Mouse looks his best for his public domain debut. HM2021 (talk) 15:20, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I’ve been waiting since 1998 for this moment. 96.2.178.30 (talk) 05:23, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

text:  from this discussion, it seems that Commons admins are already planning to undelete the film previously deleted as . The version uploaded was a 1080p video from video.disney.com. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 15:49, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. What a day January 1 will be. HM2021 (talk) 22:29, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Hey, I appreciate your splendid speech. But let's keep this talk page reserved to improvements of the Wikipedia article, shall we? ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 18:51, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

text: i still think disney will lobby to extend terms this year for the next disney short one that has mickey speaking, if not then the one in color etc. they let this one lapse because it has mickey not speaking, next year is the real test, disney will lobby hard to make sure copyright is extended for another 20-100 years mark my words to combat AI Slinkyw (talk) 00:34, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doing the honors 

message: The work is very famous as a subject of American copyright law, but when does it enter the public domain internationally? Robin S. Taylor (talk) 13:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Many countries follow rule of the shorter term. They do not grant a longer copyright term than what the country of origin does. So yes, the work enters the public domain in all those countries. Radartooth (talk) 17:52, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: thats strange how 1984 is public domain in australia but not the usa Slinkyw (talk) 00:31, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

text: It is still copyright restricted in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Dialmayo (talk) (Contribs) she/her 15:20, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright outside USA? 

message: How does Wikipedia:MOS dictate we credit multiple directors? The MoMA citation does not justify the credit order. "A Walt Disney Comic by Ub Iwerks" is the title card and is inscrutable without further research. It was common for artists to not be credited for their work back then. See e.g. The Navigator (1924 film) Anonymous-232 (talk) 03:03, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney and Iwerks, or Iwerks and Disney? 

message: I notice the title slide shows copyright 1929, and shows Mickey with white gloves.  Presumably this slide was added some time after the initial release (?).   Does there exist an actual original 1928 title slide? Gjxj (talk) 16:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed the same thing, and, concerning the copyright year, I’m not entirely sure. The gloves are no problem, though, as this was his normal promotional appearance, as can be seen on the posters on the main page. It’s possible, though, that they just dated it a year ahead. I see no good reason to suspect that it’s nonoriginal, otherwise. Master Wikinym (talk) 04:40, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  title slide. 

message: The current image of the original-release poster — :File:Steamboat Willie 1928 Poster.png — appears to be artificially enhanced. I found another image that seems to hold all the same original image information, but without predictive enhancement, on this page: https://www.animationscoop.com/first-and-foremost-the-significance-of-steamboat-willie/. It’s low-quality, but it looks truer to what I’d expect from reality, and it’s the best I could find. Ought it be replaced, and, afterward, ought it be rotated and cropped in order to straighten it? (I’ve already done that last step, on mine own local devices, but I want to ensure its acceptance by the community before imposing it on the page, especially as a new editor.)
If I’ve broken a rule, or done something else nonideally, please tell me! I’ve just joined, specifically to point this out while the page’s topic was still hot.
Master Wikinym (talk) 22:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faithfulness of poster image 

message: @DarknessGoth777 I noticed you reverted my edit by re-adding this article to the category 'Internet memes introduced in 2024'. I want to know if it appropriate to do that, considering Steamboat Willie has been a famous piece of media since 1928. – Howard🌽33 20:59, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah but it became an internet meme this year. DarknessGoth777 (talk) 01:09, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Steamboat Willie has been in the news this year because its copyright status changed, and that's been widely discussed on the internet. But that doesn't mean that the cartoon is an "internet meme", and it certainly wasn't "introduced in 2024". That category is inappropriate. Toughpigs (talk) 01:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Guideline at WP:CATV. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  On the question of if Steamboat Willie became a meme in 2024 

message: I apologise if I am miss understanding this, but why is the video in such poor quality when it is played on Wikipedia?
Thomasfan1000 (talk) 21:51, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of video