lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Madhuca longifolia

message: The "contents" box and the first picture overlap in Firefox 3.5, no idea why.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adacus12 (talk • contribs) 19:13, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout 

message: This article is a duplicate of the one at Mahwa tree. The other article seems to be more complete, so I propose moving the content from this article into that one. I don't have the time right now, but I'll try to get around to doing it soon. If someone else wants to do it before then, go ahead. Indeterminate (talk) 20:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: please remember to change the redirect page for Madhuca indica as well, since that's the proper binomial name for this species. Indeterminate (talk) 20:37, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I finished the merger, but I left the page at Madhuca longifolia, which seems to be the proper binomial. Rkitko (talk) 01:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: Currently, there are several variations for the spelling/ transliteration of the common name used in this article, including: mahuwa, mahua, and mahwa. While recognizing variations, it would be helpful, I think, if the spelling was standardized. Any suggestions? Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 16:07, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name: spelling/ transliteration 
Talk:Roger Roger (composer)

message: In the Career section, the second sentence reads "He was taught in the classical tradition,,," It is not clear to me if this refers to Roger Roger or his father. Clarification please. Rd40044004 (talk) 12:14, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have assumed that the sentence almost certainly refers to Roger Roger himself. But it's not 100% clear without a source, so I have added a tag. Martinevans123 (talk) 12:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity
Talk:Virtual IP address

message: "A server IP address depends on the MAC address of the attached NIC, and only one logical IP address may be assigned per card.": wrong. A NIC can respond to any number of IPs. Remote hosts use to ARP protocol to determine which MAC use for any given IP. The opposite is true however: an IP address can be bound to a single MAC address only.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.7.230.226 (talk) 14:37, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple addresses

message: I've edited the page substantially, to 
* provide an actual definition, rather than defining it as one of the applications
* deleting the incorrect statement referred to above
* clarifying the text (hopefully)
Learjeff (talk) 20:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements
Talk:Prairie vole

message: Edited the Reproduction section - voles are studied as an animal model of monogamous behavior, but do not display sexual fidelity. 170.140.153.249 (talk) 03:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: what do voles eat  how do they behave [[Media:Example.o[[File:[Example.jpg]]]gg]]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.249.156 (talk) 15:08, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  voles 

message: can you be senseebly what do they eat 
                              love from 
         
                                   ghyt  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.132.249.156 (talk) 15:12, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  water voles 

message: The first studies of prairie voles were done by researchers at the University of Illinois who were doing field studies of rodents:  Male-female pairs of prairies voles repeatedly fell into their live traps.  They were the ones who ascertained that prairie voles mate for life although they couldn't explain why.  Please include information about this early work.  Larry Young may have done the later work confirming oxytocin and vasopressin receptors in the brain that allowed prairie voles to identify their mate but there would have been none of that without that early work. Margaret9mary205.167.120.201 (talk) 23:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Work
Talk:Kurt Hessenberg

message: to aid assessment- is :de:Peter Cahn (Musiker) (b. 1927), musicologist and composer. Schissel | Sound the Note! 23:51, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Peter Cahn

message: We need a list of selected works to change the article from stub to "short but useful". As I have written in the German Wikipedia, I don't know yet how to justify inclusion of which works into such an abbreviated list of works. Am working on it.-- Zufus (talk) 14:29, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Subjective choices would include - limiting myself to those I've run into myself at least indirectly - the early but impressive third and fourth string quartets and cello sonata, the 2nd symphony, the later string trio. The latter two works, along with Struwwelpeter and the symphony for strings and some organ and choral works, I know have been recorded commercially. Probably does not address the question alas. Schissel | Sound the Note! 14:49, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Selected Works
Talk:Split-finger fastball

message: "Clemens's splitter, one of the tougher pitches in the history of baseball, has been a key reason for his continued success into his early forties"
Post-Mitchell, can it perhaps be argued that something else besides a split fastball is a key reason for Clemen's "continued success"?
:The splitter was an important part of Clemens' success. That doesn't mean it was the only factor. --Jprg1966 (talk) 19:32, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mitchell Report

message: This article could definitely use some. In a little while I will start by adding material from Neyer/James's Guide to Pitchers. --Jprg1966 (talk) 19:32, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Richard Eilenberg

message: Why is there disagreement between 1925 and 1927 as to death year - as there is? Can't someone find an obituary in 1925 if the former and at least make a good case for it not being 1927 if so? Etc. ... ELSchissel (talk) 22:19, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death year
Talk:Dixons City Academy

message: Entire trivia article doesn't have a single citation and frankly needs some. I couldn't find much on the people mentioned and as such couldn't fix it. CMCyantist (talk) 20:53, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of citations
Talk:The Day After Roswell

message: The last two paragraphs are basically POV/OR comments on the book's merit. GregorB (talk) 21:46, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I have fixed it, so I removed the tag.  Bubba73 (talk), 01:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV/OR 

message: I moved the following from the article page. --Dual Freq (talk) 22:48, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excerpts
Talk:Rice Hall (Ithaca, New York)

message: I suggest that this article be merged with Cornell University. This is just one of many notable buildings on the Cornell campus, and it would be unmanageable if each had its own independent article. Wiki readers would generally not look specifically for Rice Hall .. they would look for Cornell University. And if they did a search for Rice Hall, they would (and should) find it on the Cornell University article. Truthanado (talk) 22:10, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Truthanado --  Although the new Rice Hall article is very short, it and several other articles on Cornell University buildings are expected to grow, and would be too detailed for inclusion in the main Cornell University article.  See how long is the Cornell list within List of Registered Historic Places at colleges and universities.  FYI, for another university in Minnesota having 4 NRHPs, I think it was Carleton University or Carleton College, the editors just went through similar reasoning to decide that they did not want the NRHP infoboxes for each of the 4 sites included in the university page, they should be included in separate articles instead.  Each NRHP site is notable and worthy of a separate wikipedia article already, that has been determined by discussion generally previously at the WikiProject on National Register of Historic Places.  This seems to be where you differ in your prior knowledge.  So, while I don't want to remove another person's merge proposal without discussion, if you agree with me you might yourself remove your own merge proposal.  Or keep talking...  Cheers doncram (talk) 22:25, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info about the 4 NRHPs at Carleton College. I will remove the merge request. I would like to request that you add a Historic sites section to Cornell University that directs the reader to the campus's NRHPs (Rice Hall is the first), similar to the section at Carlton College. Thanks again. Truthanado (talk) 22:31, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge request removed. This is kept as a history of the discussion. Truthanado (talk) 22:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay thanks.  And i took your suggestion and added a section to the Cornell University#Historic Sites article, just now.  This was a helpful discussion and outcome, I believe. doncram (talk) 23:02, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Zester

message: Just cleaned up some vandalism, no worries. Cheers, --Royalmate1 (talk) 02:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up some vandalism 

message: Just thinking it would be good to set up a redirect from 'zester', which is what I typed to try to find this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.174.227.239 (talk) 05:46, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect?
Talk:Cataldo Amodei

message: *
*
*commons??
*musweb? 
- Aza24 (talk) 07:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future sources
Talk:List of Bristol Beaufighter operators

message: I can't find any reference that lists 487 Sqn as using Beaufighters.  487 was formed on Venturas in August 1942, and switched to Mosquitos August 1943, with which it stayed until it was disbanded.  Unless any one responds with verification that 487 used Beaus, I'll remove 487 from the list. KiwiBiggles (talk) 22:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  No 487 Sqn RAF(NZ)
Talk:Manfred Mann discography

message: Fox on the Run by Sweet is not a cover of Fox on the Run by Manfred Mann. Sweet's version is more popular and deserves the link. 70.231.148.178 (talk) 23:24, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

message: As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this article taking a look back at The Manfred Mann Album. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the article and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the external links section on this page, or, if a page is created for The Manfred Mann Album, to the external links section on that page. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! Mike harkin (talk) 19:13, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link suggestion: A look back at ''The Manfred Mann Album'' 
Talk:1st Iowa Infantry Regiment (African Descent)

message: The current title is historically inaccurate.  The correct title should  read 1st Iowa Infantry Regiment ( colored ).   That was the name used to identify these men until political correctness developed.  The use of ( African descent) is revisionist writing that implies Iowa was a less biased State than it was. Mcb133aco (talk) 18:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Nutmeg grater

message: Reverted edit stating that a nutmeg grater is also called a rasp, but now reconsidering. It is true that a nutmeg grater is generally a kind of rasp, and some g-hits pop up for "nutmeg" + "rasp". I'll try to incorporate without implying that a nutmeg grater is widely known as a rasp, which term actually encompasses a much larger definition. Richigi (talk) 04:53, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I did what I should've done in the first place and just changed "rasp" to "nutmeg rasp", which is what the anon editor intended, I'm sure.  Sometimes I act hastily, sorry if I stepped on a toe. Richigi (talk) 05:03, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rasp 

message: I've removed the statement, "Any grater capable of fine grating, such as a microplane, can be used to grate nutmeg." It isn't sourced for one thing but even if it were it's like saying one can use any sort toothbrush, such as an Oral B to clean one's teeth. It's not informative, opinionated, and can be viewed as promoting a brand name. Thus it's not really very encyclopedic. SentientParadox (talk) 20:17, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed final statement.
Talk:Cawood sword

message: I don't know why this has its own page. Sure, it is "outstandingly important", but only in context, and the context is a highly specific topic of 12th century development of sword morphology in Europe. So it should be part of a discussion on that topic, and not a "random artefact" article. --dab (𒁳) 13:37, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: There is additional material available to discuss 'The Cawood Sword' as a standalone topic. Its in the Yorkshire Museum and several of the other "Star objects" have unique pages. I'm COI so don't want to rewrite the page, but there is useful secondary sources that can be found: 
*The object page with York Museums Trust: http://www.yorkmuseumstrust.org.uk/collections/search/item/?id=11769&search_query=c2VhcmNoX3RleHQ9Y2F3b29kK3N3b3Jk
*Local information: http://www.cawoodheritage.org.uk/wordpress/?page_id=557 
*PostHole article: http://www.theposthole.org/read/article/28
*In the Oakeshott link on the main page -- Zakhx150 (talk) 14:54, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Cucumis (website)

message: Could someone explain what is meant here? --Una Smith (talk) 22:24, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Cucumis" a dirty word in Czech/Slovak?

message: *WebProNews article — Mr. Stradivarius on tour ♪ talk ♪ 01:41, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible source
Talk:XIII: The Conspiracy

message: the storyline seems freakishly similar to the XIII (video game) which is based on the XIII_(comic)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.147.16 (talk) 03:01, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  based on video game? 

message: Granted, it may have been completely made up, but are there any links to the roman coup the photoshop girl mentions that are the inspiration to the roman numeral tattoos?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.64.2.76 (talk) 17:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: roman coup?

message: Parts of this miniseries were also filmed in Georgetown, ON
--FusionOpz (talk) 09:37, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filming location 

message: This was labelled "miniseries", but according to the Wiki article about miniseries, the two recognised definitions of a miniseries are either "four to six episodes of various lengths" or "a limited run program of more than two and less than the 13-part season or half -season block associated with serial or series programming." This is to be regarded a TV film which was shown in two parts in some countries, while in others, like the UK, it was shown as one single feature. I've changed the text accordingly. Thomas Blomberg (talk) 01:52, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a miniseries, but a TV film in two parts
Talk:Real World/Road Rules Challenge: The Gauntlet 2

message: Can someone please fix this apparently undoable vandalism?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.152.62.146 (talk) 23:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I've got it done.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.152.62.146 (talk) 23:24, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  MASSIVE vandalism
Talk:Battle of Algiers (1956–1957)

message: I think it might be worthwhile to edit this article all the way through for clarity and grammar, and potentially to fix some of the sourcing along the way. My sense is that all of the information contained here is correct, but is often poorly presented and hard to read. I'm happy to do some of this, but if others are able to help out it would be fantastic. This is an important topic and information about it should be presented as clearly as possible!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammytwiki (talk • contribs) 04:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar and sourcing issues throughout article 

message: I am debating making a change to the page. It refers to the belligerents as French vs Muslim. The latter is inaccurate; it was a nationalistic movement, with elements of religion but largely the purpose was independence in a nationalistic sense. To describe one side as Muslim is needless.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coldwayz (talk • contribs) 11:31, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible issue with terminology 

message: A uncommunicative IP has disrupted the lead, forcing me to add more to it (per NPOV). Further so-called clarifications and edit warring have turned it into a mess following their misrepresentation of the added source. I suggest restoring the stable version to give them more chance to seek consensus for whatever changes they want to apply to it. M.Bitton (talk) 23:42, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead is fine as it is now. 37.163.0.75 (talk) 23:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it certainly is not. You shamelessly misrepresented a source to make it look as though the Pieds Noirs and the police carried out a terrorist attack against the FLN, when in fact they killed civilians in their sleep. Anyway, it's a bit too late to start communicating now that you've been reported to the admins. M.Bitton (talk) 23:53, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you have made two edits in a row where it looked like the French and the FNL were fighting together against the French forces, and I fixed them. Learn to write decently instead of wasting the admins' time. 37.163.0.75 (talk) 00:01, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that you are now adding childish attacks to the mix. This is new (though not surprising). M.Bitton (talk) 00:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that you are an expert in childish behaviour, but unfortunately for you not in recognizing it. What I wrote is objectively correct. 37.163.0.75 (talk) 00:11, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Personal attacks won't be tolerated. I'm done here. M.Bitton (talk) 00:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent disruptive editing
Talk:Steve's Ice Cream

message: * The article is only just beginning, so it is only classed as Start
* Because this company was instrumental in creating the markets for super-premium ice cream, the business concept of high end ice cream chains and customized ice cream desserts, it has an importance of High.
* The text "As far as I know" is not Wikipedia style.  No first person please.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.131.221.92 (talk) 22:11, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: This article meets the four standards of notability:
# There is significant coverage of the subject in the independent press;Look at the citations provided, articles in the the Boston Globe and the New York Times.
# The sources are reliable;The Globe and the Times are considered to be extremely reliable.
# The sources are all secondary, or if primary, follow the WP:PSTS guides for primary sources;Most definitely secondary.
# I generated none of the information, am not promoting the products, it is not structured as an ad (no peacock statements) and it is not a press release.
Please understand that this article is only a start at this time and is being expanded. Steve's is an important company in this business:
# The company pretty much invented the "super premium" market segment in the ice cream industry;
# The concept of the mix-in which spawned a whole series of products and companies that still exist today;
# It is not a biography of Steve Herrell, but a look at the company he founded.
- Jeremy (Jerem43 (talk) 18:23, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I added the player piano to the article, but had no citations for the dime rental of rolls or Steve rebuilding it, because those are personal knowledge from having patronized Steve's in the late 1970's.
When I got a player piano of my own, I took a book on rebuilding them out of the Cambridge library. Written on the flyleaf was "I rebuilt a player piano using only this book - Steve Herrell." Don't know if I can cite this, though. Bilofsky (talk) 01:22, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Player Piano 

message: From my personal memory, the candy additions to the ice cream were known as mix-ins at Steve's. They were renamed smoosh-ins when Steve started his new business, Herrell's, probably because the rights to the mix-in name went along with the sale of Steve's. Steve's continued to call them mix-ins until it closed. (I don't have any citations for this, thus not added to the article.)
Mdulcey (talk) 14:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mix-ins
Talk:The Walt Disney Christmas Show

message: This entire article is based on a misunderstandment. The show shown on Nordic TV has a different name and history in english see http://www.tvparty.com/xmas-disney.html for instance Carewolf (talk) 23:14, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting, the synopsis of the Swedish show does look like it is derived from the Walt Disney Christmas show. Maybe it is only the danish that is derived from the Disneyland episode. I will have to study this. Carewolf (talk) 23:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Feeling silly here replying to myself. Okay the synopsis on the swedish article does not match the show The Walt Disney Christmas Show. The later is in black and white, and features Walt Disney in person, and many other things that doesn't fit. And I can prove for a fact that many clips in the swedish show does in fact come from the show From All of Us to All of You. I think I remember the Swedish show as similar to the one in Denmark, I and know that the one in Denmark was infact originally From All of Us To All of You. On the other hand the synopsis of the Swedish show is in many ways different from the Danish. Could someone from Sweden please take a look at the link in the first comment and check? Carewolf (talk) 00:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Swedish show is definitely the one described as "From All of Us to All of You". So, this page should either be renamed, or the content should be moved to a new article... -- Kildor (talk) 11:54, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Swedish show did feature Walt Disney in person during the first few years, but it was later removed. I seem to understand that SVT originally broadcasted "The Walt Disney Christmas Show", but later made lots of changes to it, including adding several clips from "From All of Us to All of You". But I might be wrong. (212.247.11.155 (talk) 09:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I guess the main difference is how the clips are framed. In From All of Us... the frame is a stage with Mickey playing piano, Jiminy Cricket opening christmas carts and singing the theme song in the end. This is also something I can't tell from the synopsis. Carewolf (talk) 10:15, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mix-in

message: My personal recollection is that "mix-in" was Steve's original name for the concept, and he coined "smoosh-in" after he sold the original Steve's and started Herrell's. But I cannot find a definitive statement of that on the web (yet). The Steve's Ice Cream wikipedia page hints mix-in came first by mentioning it first and later speaking of smoosh-ins, but this is not definitive in my view. So, I changed the wording to something uncontroversial "another term ...." Rpgpoet (talk) 17:43, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion