Talk:Leslie Fiedler

message: The quotation from the Writer's Almanac 2005 is from a copyright web page. please don't add such material to Wikipedia: we can't use it, and cleaning it up causes trouble.
Charles Matthews 09:35, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 1.  sporadic, not sporatic.
2. "Fiedler was invited to Hollywood parties through his connections and was able to meet Burgess Meredith and Shirley MacLaine among others."  This is silly.  
3. Love and Death is not a deconstruction.
4. In the section on 'Drug charges', there are links to the University of Amsterdam and the University of Sussex. The problem with the the  prefix is that Wikipedia does not recognize that it already has articles about these institutions. I am not an experienced editor so could someone please correct this?
done point 4 --Jahsonic 17:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miscellaneous Comments 

message: One editor accuses me of "trolling" on this page whereas I am only trying to make it neutral. readable and reliable. Previous to my edits it read like a gushing fan's page. I've tried to introduce a neutral tone and to remove hyperbolic, UNVERIFIED statements. It needs a vast number of citations, something I have tried to indicate. George Custer's Sabre (talk) 10:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trolling? Not! 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Leslie Fiedler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120204041415/http://www.centerforbookculture.org/dalkey/backlist/fiedler.html to http://www.centerforbookculture.org/dalkey/backlist/fiedler.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Leslie Fiedler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060213091324/http://www.counterpunch.org/jackson01032004.html to http://www.counterpunch.org/jackson01032004.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Leslie Fiedler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080706160602/http://wings.buffalo.edu/AandL/english/faculty/fiedler/fiedler-cv.html to http://wings.buffalo.edu/AandL/english/faculty/fiedler/fiedler-cv.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There are an alarming number of "citation needed" notes on this page. Surely this is the responsibility of the person who wrote the article? I can correct errors in spelling, punctuation, etc., but I am not prepared to do extensive research. Are there editors who enjoy or specialize in this sort of thing? If no one steps up, shouldn't the article be removed or heavily edited to remove the unsourced statements? 
2601:5C2:200:59A8:41FB:8CDB:C551:B057 (talk) 05:35, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the responsibility of the person who put in the numerous cn notices to ensure that they are not in the references cited. In this case I believe they mostly are. There is a certain type of troll who makes mischief by going around putting cn notices everywhere and being too lazy to check them themself. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:51, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: A mention of his framed-up prosecution for drug offenses initiated by corrupt police in the sixties should be included. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations desperately needed 

message: All the matetrial that I removed was unreferenced and tagged as such for almost three years (since September 2016)! For it to be replaced will require an editor to add reliable and published third-party sources. I deleted the material according to the WP:BURDEN and WP:NOCITE guidelines. According to the former (which also states that: "Any material lacking a reliable source directly supporting it may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source"), the burden is not on me to provide the sources, but on any editor who wants to add the information again ("The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution"). Best regards, George Custer's Sabre 04:10, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of unreferenced material that has been tagged as requiring citations for almost three years