Talk:Leo the Lion (MGM)

message: :Image:Mgm-2001.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 07:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Mgm-2001.jpg

message: :Image:MGM Ident 1938.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:MGM Ident 1938.jpg

message: :Image:MGM Ident 1953 Cinemascope.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:MGM Ident 1953 Cinemascope.jpg

message: :Image:MGM Ident 1956-57.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 13:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:MGM Ident 1956-57.jpg

message: It's going around on YouTube that the mid-fifties "fluffy" lion is named Bob. Any credence to this? -74.72.199.61 (talk) 19:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly, though it's really not that noteworthy to include in the article (especially without a source). --LBM | TALK TO ME 16:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

text: "Bob", as I have it understood, was the popular name used around the studio, half-kidding, for this lion. "al-Marah" is the proper name I hear most, although there were others. But no concrete references for any of these claims - just legends.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fonnyboy (talk • contribs) 16:02, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Fluffy Lion

message: Does anyone know who trained each of the lions?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.20.52.149 (talk) 14:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trainers 

message: The image :Image:MGM Logo.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:      File:MGM logo.png
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --10:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:MGM Logo.jpg

message: I hear the first Leo was born in a zoo. What about the others?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.103.12.109 (talk) 02:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did the lions come from? 

message: I remember in a MGM (I think the title was something like "the captain and the kids")there was an animated lion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.103.162.222 (talk) 00:26, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animated Lion? 

message: I have restored the removal of the entirely unsourced, extremely long and pointless trivia section. Some items were questionable and almost all non-notable. Wikipedia discourages these random lists about which there is nothing remotely encyclopedic. This trivial info is better suited to someone's blog or fan site. If it is felt that some of these items were important, please incorporate them into the body of the article, using sources if at all possible. Markhh (talk) 05:45, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: Where did that name come from for the 5th logo?  All I know that the lion's name is unknown but commonly known as "Leo" to everyone else.  King Shadeed 14:31, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major 

message: As the page is titled "Leo the Lion", I wonder why there is nothing about his time of death and the grave.
I found the year 1938 mentioned here: http://www.people.com/people/archive/article/0,,20104047,00.html
And his grave was opn a private property, but I can't find anything about if it's still here as of 2014 or not.
http://www.roadsideamerica.com/story/3609  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.70.81.151 (talk) 08:21, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death and grave 

message: Given that MGM has information about their movies, why don't they have information about the last films to be released with those lions? DudeWithAFeud (talk) 20:57, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last appearances of Jackie and Tanner? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Leo the Lion (MGM). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20121205093550/http://www.tvacres.com/adanimals_leolion.htm to http://www.tvacres.com/adanimals_leolion.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140725153854/http://www.lippincott.com/en/work/mgm to http://www.lippincott.com/en/work/mgm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Very confusing subhead. So there was a different Slats before the one that the paragraph is about? And the one born in 1919 was given the same name? The other lion isn't even mentioned except in the photo caption. A subhead with a date range that doesn't jibe with the birth date of the animal the paragraph talks about is confusing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geniuswaitress (talk • contribs) 19:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slats (1916–1928) but born in 1919? 

message: Speaking not mainly as a Wikipedia editor, but as a scholar of film history, this is an invaluable article with great detail not to be found anywhere else -- in fact, it's an example of how an article with a high (to some, nerdy) level of detail, all well-sourced, can offer a reference resource that would otherwise be unavailable. I am inclined to leave the article as is and remove the tag, but would not want to do so without input from other Wikipedians. Clevelander96 (talk) 00:48, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overly detailed? I don't think so. 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
*  ()
*  ()
Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion 

message: Under header “Bill, Telly and Coffee” according to this article https://www.giantfreakinrobot.com/ent/mgm-logo.html, the “unnamed lion” that appeared in the films Buffalo Bill’s Last Fight and The Heart of General Robert E Lee is called Bill. 2A01:4C8:144B:6692:6880:88EC:626D:EF13 (talk) 11:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. RudolfRed (talk) 22:15, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 March 2021