Talk:Nithiin

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, perhaps User:, or other recent contributors to this article, will make some constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. — Triwbe (talk) 16:44, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree ... I mean, the subject doesn't even have an IMDb entry! How NN can you get?? — 72.75.82.202 (talk) 21:51, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDb is not a reliable source, whether for establishing or denying notability. He has this entry which seems to mix details of two Nitins and also this incomplete one. A Google News search demonstrates clear notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:30, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As per Wikipedia is not a collection of lists, I have reduced the Filmography section of  to just the films that have Wikipedia articles, and renamed it to Selected filmography ... people can click the IMDb External link that follows the section to see the subject's full filmography with links to information about each of their films.
Please see the template's talk page for examples of using the , , , and  templates.
I have also used 19xx tags for the years of the films, since 19xx has little encyclopedic value.
Anonymous edits without comments may be reverted by anyone.
I am placing this boilerplate message on this Discussion page before I actually make the changes, so that I can just put "see Discussion page" in the edit summary, and hopefully not have my edit summarily reverted as vandalism by Some Other Editor.
Happy Editing! —  20:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selected filmography 

message: Based on the message above, I have added the following  templates:
*
*
Confused as IMDb may be about the subject, I'm willing to back off on the WP:N, and I'll take The Times of India as a sufficient WP:RS ... that's as much lipstick as I feel like putting on this pig. :-)
Happy Editing! —  18:28, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMDb links 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Nithiin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.indiaglitz.com/nithin-karunakaran-movie-launched-telugu-news-107766
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.indiaglitz.com/nithin-karunakarans-movie-heroine-is-mishti-tamilfont-news-107485
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified