lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:NanoInk

message: Unfortunately I know nothing about the subject material so can't rewrite/clean up the article myself, but at first glance it looks like only slightly changed advertising material. For example, "NanoInk's proprietary Nanoencryption technology provides a unit level solution to the problem of counterfeiting." is horrible adspeak jargon - and worse still, nowhere are we told what "Nanoencryption" actually is, rather than simply being told of its effects.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.61.104 (talk) 23:35, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a mess 

message: I've tagged this article to be deleted. Please discuss this here. You can read up on the whole AfD process as well at Wikipedia:PROD--Cubic Hour (talk) 16:10, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the process for discussing deletion is documented at WP:AFD. The WP:PROD process is for deletion without discussion. As you seem to want this to be discussed I'll remove the prod tag and start an AfD discussion, which will be linked to from the template in the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD Discussion
Talk:Namiki

message: Since this is the English Wikipedia, can we have a parenthetical translation of the word "urushi"?  If it's in the English language, my apologies. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tetty2 (talk • contribs) 22:21, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urushi 
Talk:Namesys

message: The namesys website seems to be offline - anybody have any recent news? CobraA1 13:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it's time to update the article to reflect that "DNS issues" are probably not the most relevant factor.  Is there anything definitive that can be cited about Namesys' ultimate fate?--NapoliRoma (talk) 00:05, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namesys seems to be down 

message: I understand the reason for the Notability notice. But this is linksed to a number of other articles, not on the sad Mr. Reiser, but also the article about his file system.  Perhaps this article can be combined with the one about the file system? Proxy User (talk) 18:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: As of currently 55378008a (talk) 02:56, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  www.namesys.com back up
Talk:Juice (JVM)

message: I removed the tag related to notability, since I added some references.
I did the same for the cleanup tag, since I tried to clean a bit the article.
If you have other comments on that, please be more detailed. I'll try to fix it.
Prof3ta 15:17, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Why does "JUICE" appear in all caps in the first sentence? Is it an acronym? Why the difference between the title and the first sentence?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.42.26.190 (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acronym 

message: Where is this software / the licese of this software? --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 22:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  License 
Talk:Nair (hair removal)

message: Craig Ferguson described it to Kenneth Branagh as a relatively new product, but i'd bet it was available, under the same name, before KB was born. Hmm, Wired] mentions 1970s.--Jerzy•t 06:56, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How recent? 

message: Nair (hair removal) to be changed to Dr.Jain as there is no such product to be added in wikipedia.
Nair's slogans include: "The Less That You Wear, the More You Need Nair!"; "Like Never Before"; and "We wear short shorts, Nair for short shorts" 
to be deleted as there is no such slogan 
the Phrase below to be added 
Dr.Jain makes a variety of products.[1]
Lotions
Shower Powerage
Soothing Wax Kit
Salon Divine Wax Kit
Face Wax Strips
Microwave Wax
Bikini Cream
Face Cream
Upper Lip Cream
Sensitive Formula
Lasting Results Gel Cream
Nair Pretty
Nair For Men
Spray Away
Roll On Wax
http://www.healthbyayurveda.in/brands/Dr.jain's.html
Santoshksbhagyashri (talk) 11:21, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Nair is a legitimate product and there is no reason to remove or change the content of the article as you suggest. If Dr.Jain is notable then a separate article can be created. Sarahj2107 (talk) 12:30, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 October 2016 

message: It feels weird knowing there's no image of this product on the article. MightyArms (talk) 17:52, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:In a Free Land

message: Based on this picture http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_vev0qJqPeSU/R0tctm5AKVI/AAAAAAAAAE8/r-CjlV-dZrE/s320/Back.jpg I changed the tracklist.--Tomvasseur (talk) 20:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracklist adjustment 
Talk:Richard Slaughter

message: I having got the responsibility of editing this page.I need to add publications,papers to this page and complete this task as soon as possible.I request you to enable the editing. 
Simon Criss (talk) 13:05, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: What edits are you trying to make? Please list some here, and they can be added by another editor while it's locked. Ruby Murray 13:43, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: From the phrase "I having got the responsibility of editing this page" it sounds as if you are working for Richard Slaughter, or an organization related to him.If so, please read Wikipedia's policy on Conflict of Interest before proceeding. If not, please explain what you mean by "I having got the responsibility of editing this page". - Arjayay (talk) 13:49, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 January 2014 

message: This article has been frequently stuffed full of unsourced puffery about Mr. Slaughter, along with long lists of every article he's ever written, and copypasted bookjacket blurbs for all his books. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ravindra H K for a history. Ruby Murray 14:20, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Sockpuppetry
Talk:Mutt Mitt

message: I searched Google News and came up with a few more sources, because A. the article is a stub and B. almost all if not all the sources aren't third party.
*https://buckrail.com/year-in-review-paws-of-jackson-hole-2019/
*https://www.picayunecurrent.com/2020-dog-poop-bags-market-is-thriving-worldwide-by-size-revenue-emerging-trends-and-top-growing-companies-2025
*https://fnbherald.com/2020/01/03/pet-waste-stations-market-segment-2020-2025-industry-trends-market-strategy-revenue-forecast/
*https://laois-nationalist.ie/2019/12/10/mutt-mitts-give-dog-owners-no-excuse-for-leaving-poo-on-streets/
*https://testifyandrecap.com/global-pet-waste-stations-market-trends-growth-size-outlook-challenges-drivers-analysis-and-future-estimations-2026/60457/
*https://www.jhnewsandguide.com/opinion/columnists/good_dog/poop-fairy-brigade-makes-dog-poo-go-poof-but-these/article_a7ef8e0b-e403-5ec2-958e-597a71f967d2.html
*https://www.superiortelegram.com/lifestyle/4607472-superior-dog-owners-urged-scoop-poop
*https://statsflash.com/global-dog-poop-bags-market-business-analysis-2019-by-cagr-share-revenue-and-prominent-key-players-to-2025/681261/
--PrussianOwl (talk) 07:25, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  More sources found
Talk:Musicland

message: Musicland is sometimes also used to descibe the transcoding of ISMN sheet music numbers into ISMN13, cf Bookland ISNB10 to ISNB13  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.125.16.11 (talk) 14:16, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:E-Group

message: This is an interesting subject, but hard to understand without a plan showing the actual lay-out.77.162.130.139 (talk) 11:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plan needed! 

message: The variation within the E-groups needs a systematic discussion.77.162.130.139 (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Variations 

message: All topics can be discussed in a e-group in a resposible manner.Dont use it to harm other. 114.108.224.52 (talk) 06:15, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  TLE
Talk:Charles Garry

message: The year of his death is not listed in this article, and the other details of his death are not easily corroborated. Doing some research I have been unable to find any obituaries, except for this reference in the Cult Observer Archives that appears to be verbatim where the line in the wikipedia article comes from. The archive article appears to be from October of 1991. It cites an article in August of 1991, but what information from the article is "from" that article is unclear, as the article preceeds the given date or Garry's death by two months. Other versions of this article exist without a "fram" typo, but this does not seem a reliable source. Time for a trip to the library.Gruber76 17:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added several new facts and cites. But there still isn't one listing the cause of death for Garry or the month of his death.Mosedschurte (talk) 10:40, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions but still need source for "Stroke" and time of death

message: There are some significant factual errors in this article. 1. Charles Garry did NOT represent the Chicago 7. He was unable to represent Bobby Seale in that case due to his hospitalization for gall bladder surgery--Seale demanded a trial delay in order to be represented by Garry--Judge Julius Hoffman denied Seales request, and ordered him represented by William Kunstler, who along with Leonard Weinglass represented the other defendants in that case--Seale also demanded to be allowed to act as his own attorney which was also denied--Hoffman ordered Seale bound and gagged trying to silence his outbursts in court--Hoffman eventually severed Seale from the case-- 2. The other defendants in the Chicago 7 trial were NOT acquitted--Two were acquitted of all charges, the other 5 acquitted of conspiracy but CONVICTED of crossing state lines with intent to incite riot, and were sentenced to 5 years imprisonment. The convictions were overturned on appeal. Nothing but (talk) 14:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  FACTUAL ERROR 
Talk:Multigroup

message: http://www.novinite.com/articles/112713/Who+Is+Who%3A+Murdered+Bulgarian+Tycoon+Iliya+Pavlov
http://www.economist.com/node/1633644
http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6ad4e1c.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.220.112.103 (talk) 12:27, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly relevant material 
Talk:MultiChoice

message: Where would one fine an article or section on the multi-choice question format for examinations etc? Is there one? Richard001 04:47, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At Multiple choice. - htonl 19:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is medialternatives.com, self-identified as a fringe blog, being used as the main source of this article, when there are a plethora of solidly mainstream sources available? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:33, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radical fringe blog 

message: I am the originator of the copy for the MultiChoice Wikipedia page (I am employed by the company and have declared this fact). I've been informed of the copyright issues (even though we are the copyright holders) and have been advised not to edit the existing copy but to post my recommendations here. I'd like to suggest that we delete the page so that I can create a new one that will be in keeping with Wikipedia's stipulations.
PeterPieglMultiChoice (talk) 10:24, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: PeterPieglMultiChoice, there is no reason to delete this article because there was a version that was created without copied content. Please read Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and work within the recommended processes to post your recommendations for any changes. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request edit on 15 August 2018 

message: I believe my recent edit of the page should assist with the notability issue. MultiChoice has recently listed on the JSE and there is also the ICASA, KSS issue regarding transfer of broadcasting licence. As an aside, MultiChoice Group includes ShowMax, which has its own Wikipedia page. Might that also be considered for notability? Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 18:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In light of the fact that no one has contested notability since my post above on 1 March 2019, I have removed the notability and stubs. Could someone please rerate this page, thanks? Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 17:26, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  In time of notabilities this article even without citations it's notable, a 25000 subscribers per day and 5,000,000 viewers a day, ahhha, that awesome. I know well enwiki isn't a advert place but this one is OK to be here; that's from the viewer crowds voices and choice. This page will just need a little improvement and that is it. (F5pillar---/  'Messager🖋📩) 20:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: I paid for my dstv account but it's still doesn't work Mogau matlou (talk) 17:58, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dstv Account 

message: Why are you not loading all episodes of  Binnelanders on Catchupp? 105.244.223.201 (talk) 21:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Binnelanders
Talk:MTM Enterprises

message: When did Mimsie die? Because on St. Elsewhere, at the end of the final episode, a cat is dead.
* I don't know Mimsie's death date, but I know that she died in 1988. Gabrielkat 23:38, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mimsie's death date????? 

message: The tag redirects here, but there's no mention in the article of the cat at all. I mean, I grew up staring at the little booger at least a couple times a day almost all of my childhood after watching my favorite shows. It would be nice to know a little bit about the cat -- I'm not requesting a huge biography or anything, as in number of mice eaten during his lifetime or his first litter-box usage... Did he belong to Mary Tyler Moore and Grant Tinker? Is there an anecdote involving him? Did Mary (with tears in eyes, of course) tell a tale of a cute little stray that showed up at the studio and they just had to film him? Or did they say, "Hey, we need a logo with a kitten on it to make fun of MGM -- go to the Pound and get one"?
Just curious.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.169.223.49 (talk) 04:09, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Mimsie, aside from being the cat on the logo?
Talk:Frederick J. Bliss

message: A. C. (Archibald Campbell ) Dickie had been left out until now, and the Jerusalem dig is always credited to "Bliss & Dickie", in one breath. He might never get an art. of his own, but here's his biography, in the shape of his 1941  Palestine Exploration Quarterly obituary.
:I suggest you write an article about him. If you do, I'll make sure it's translated into Hebrew. Thanks. Hanay (talk) 00:48, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A. C. Dickie
Talk:MSC Cruises

message: I corrected the section on MSC's ships under construction. Information used was taken from the company's website.
Here is the specific page it is from. http://www.msccruisesusa.com/unacrocieramsc/default.asp?unacrocieramsc_id=203&page_id=1618
:MSC's own website is not up to date. You can find the correct information here: http://www.maritimematters.com/dakeslist.html - Kjet 17:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction to a correction!

message: The assertion that MSC has withheld refunds and has changed its refund policies repeatedly is not documented in the USA Today commentary that is cited, and the characterization that they "unconscionably" did so is an opinion.  Should the whole assertion be removed? So far, it looks to be without a factual basis. Bistropha (talk) 23:26, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Recent developments" 

message: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Abuse_filter&diff=675042943&oldid=674949176   — Jeff G. ツ 12:29, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (July 2022) 
Talk:Tonnetz

message: mmmmmmmm . . . doughnuts —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.249.136.184 (talk • contribs) 
last links don't work
some more could be given about recent developments  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.2.145.135 (talk) 17:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Misc.

message: The "Chart" section of the article has unsourced information and is poorly formatted. What's more, the claims it makes (that modern representations of the Tonnetz usually orient the perfect relationship as ascending) do not match my experience -- publications by Richard Cohn and Dmitri Tymoczko orient this relationship horizontally. If someone wants to add it back in with sources to back up the claims and better formatting, by all means go ahead. But I think it doesn't provide very useful or relevant information anyways. Shugurim (talk) 08:06, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing "Chart" section 

message: The correct symbol is , not  as the lead illustration has it. Double sharp (talk) 04:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong symbols for double sharp 

message: The article includes in its section "History through 1900" the following statement:
:The Tonnetz was rediscovered in 1858 by Ernst Naumann.
This most probably refers to Naumann's book Über die verschiedenen Bestimmungen der Tonverhältnisse, published in Leipzig in 1858. Yet, I have been unable to find any reference to the Tonnetz, or any image of it, in this book. From a closer examination, I think that the mistake comes from the fact that von Oettingen, in his Harmoniesystem in dualer Entwickelung, published eight years later, explains that as he was not concerned with absolute pitches, he did not make use of the notation used by Naumann and Hauptmann before him (and known today as Helmholtz' notation, using capitals and lower case letters, and apostrophes for higher notes, say C c c' c" etc.). This apparently was mistaken for a reference to the Tonnetz in Naumann.
The question interests me much, as I try to reconstruct the history of the Tonnetz, and I'd be interested by any information available on this point, expecially if contributor 24.61.186.119 is still around: he added the mention of Neumann to the article on 30 April 2014, but has been inactive since then.
Thanks in advance. — Hucbald.SaintAmand (talk) 18:09, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a source that answers my question, on https://europeanmusictheory.eu/, and modified the first paragraph of  History through 1900 accordingly. — Hucbald.SaintAmand (talk) 16:08, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the rediscovery of the Tonnetz by Naumann
Talk:Kapustinskii equation

message: I've got a list of three assumptions used to form the Kapustinskii equation from the Born-Landé equation in my first-year undergraduate lecture notes (handwritten by me, so no copyright issues). Shall I put them up to improve the article? Brammers (talk) 15:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assumptions/Derivation from Born-Landé equation

message: The equation is given thus (delinked).
U_{L} = - 1202.5 \cdot \frac{\nu \cdot |z^+| \cdot |z^-|}{r^+ + r^-} \cdot \biggl( 1 - \frac{0.345}{r^+ + r^-} \biggr) 
... It is important to remember that the units of the radii in this equation are Ångström, and the lattice energy is given in kJ/mol.
It's more usual to write something like 
U_{L} = - {a} \cdot \frac{\nu \cdot |z^+| \cdot |z^-|}{r^+ + r^-} \cdot \biggl( 1 - \frac{b}{r^+ + r^-} \biggr) 
and then define the constants a & b in terms of appropriate units.  The question is what we should use as coefficients, a & b or something else. We then don't have to "remember" to use these units or those.
Looking at this, K and d seem decent labels for the coefficients.
We thus get:
:U_{L} = - {K} \cdot \frac{\nu \cdot |z^+| \cdot |z^-|}{r^+ + r^-} \cdot \biggl( 1 - \frac{d}{r^+ + r^-} \biggr) 
:
where	K = 1.2025 J·m·mol−1
     	d = 3.45 m
     	ν is the number of ions in the empirical formula,
     	z− and z+ are the numbers of elementary charge on the anion and cation, respectively, and
     	r− and r+ are the radii of the anion and cation, respectively.
JIMp talk·cont 22:10, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coefficients
Talk:Mr. Bubble

message: Recent edits have made this article into an advertisement.  Substantial rewriting needs to be done to regain neutrality.  I've tagged it. --Captain Infinity (talk) 01:36, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted to previous stable version, removing all advertising edits made by employee of the manufacturer of the product). --Captain Infinity (talk) 02:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged as an advertisement 

message: The opening of the article starts out saying its the brand, and then the second paragraph says "mr bubble was invented" referring to the first invented original formula of the bubble bath. As a reader tying to learn what the product is I found it a harsh and confusing transition till reading through the whole article. Can we have some distinction as to when the brand is being written about, vs one of the products in the brand?  Maybe in the second paragraph just adding "the mr bubble brand started with the mr bubble bubble bath" or whatever the case may be? Dancindazed (talk) 16:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this an article on the brand or the original product?
Talk:Tarbat Ness Lighthouse

message: I removed yearbuilt = 1855-1857 because it is inconsistent with year first lit and is not detailed in the NLB official version.--JBellis 17:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the article, the lighthouse "has an elevation of 53 metres and 37 steps to the top of the tower." Although this is confirmed by the nlb page, it clearly can't be right. (I've been up this lighthouse and it definitely didn't have ~1.4 metre steps.)  Maybe it's a typo for 137 steps? AndrewWTaylor (talk) 18:19, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many steps?
Talk:Movietone News

message: Probably due to changes in corporate ownership, Fox Movietone failed to properly file copyright renewals for large swathes of its content prior to 1948. Under the 1909 Copyright Act in effect at the time, this means that the content has lapsed to the public domain in the United States. Reference the mopix copyright ledgers at the Library of Congress's Copyright Office. The repositories holding onto the content can license access to the original film elements (as that is physical property), but cannot license the intellectual property.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgreene820 (talk • contribs) 14:08, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright renewal
Talk:UNI Financial Cooperation

message: What are you disputing here by way of the  tag? Largoplazo (talk) 15:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I no longer have a dispute on this article and have removed the tag. Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:00, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content dispute? 

message: Hello, I am a member of RC Patrol on the French side. We've just received a request to protect the article from IP 108.171.95.42 because they want to forbid "people who don't belong to the organization" to change anything on the page. Kind regards, --Bédévore [knock knock] 16:45, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI
Talk:Mountain Safety Research

message: About 1972-74, there was a controversy about appropriate materials for climbing ropes.  Larry Penberthy played a significant role in this.  Perhaps the article could be expanded to cover this subject. Oaklandguy (talk) 21:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Penberthy's role in materials for climbing ropes 
Talk:Mountain Park Concrete

message: This article was written only by Marvin Heemeyer's feuds with them so it doesn't have any impact to be honest 2402:800:6205:495B:A915:7BB7:EEA3:31BC (talk) 03:25, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete this?
Talk:Mountain Apple Company

message: I'm not sure how this article got to recording the date as 1974. A lot of the interviews say 1977 and one says 1978. The Hawaii secretary of state website says December 1977, so that's what I'm going with. Grorp (talk) 01:12, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorporated 1977, not 1974