lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Calif Records

message: Please explain why notability is not an issue? This seems to be a vanity page. Poorly written, no third party references, nothing notable mentioned.  --Editor2020 (talk) 21:01, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info. Could you add some references from Kenyan media?--Editor2020 (talk) 19:56, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I plan to cleanup this page and add references one day (currently I'm too busy...). Three Kenyan newspapers do have websites, namely Daily Nation, The Standard and Kenya Times, and they do write about Kenyan music, particularly on weekends. None of them have good archives, and digging up reliable sources demands some determined research. Julius Sahara (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Republika Srpska Air Force

message: The VRS had also received about 12 P-2 Kraguj, including at least 2 Krajina Serb examples. Does anyone have information as to their fate? Askari Mark (Talk) 15:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  P-2 Kraguj 

message: This article identifies the air force unit as the 1 Puk, but most other sources I've found say it's the 15 Puk. What's the correct story here? Askari Mark (Talk) 16:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st or 15th Regiment? 
Talk:Asian Montessori Center

message: This page is for the discussion of the article about the school Southernside Montessori School. You may discuss any contributions or changes within this page.
Hhh210 15:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I have recently reverted this article for advertising.
You can view the article before it was reverted on this link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Southernside_Montessori_School&oldid=170323357
Thank you!
Hhh210 19:34, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia is not an advertising Service!
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Louisdale History (Grandique ferry)

message: Jim Goit
NSAC. Embrace Your World
Visit our Website at http://nsac.ca/
>>> On 11/13/2007 at 10:56 PM, bill jackson  wrote:
Hi: 
I'm from Louisdale. I would like permission to use info about Louisdale's Blueberry Association on your website and discuss crown land would be set aside by Lands and Forest in an article on Wikipedia about Louisdale.
      
If you have the info and you are allowed to send me it, I would like to know the names of the subscribers and the witnesses. If you don't have it, where can I find this information.
Thank You. 
Grandiqueferry 15:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: =========
Talk:Wolf Ladejinsky

message: I currently have no access to the main source of info:
*. 
* Ling.Nut 16:01, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rough start

message: ..eventually, for each country e.g. Taiwan Miracle --Ling.Nut 09:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *OK modest steps.. eventually i'd like to have separate sections for each country, but for now maybe one about his role as a land reformer, one about the Red Scare stuff and one (?) about the Green revolution.. --Ling.Nut (talk) 08:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: separate sections

message: produces identical output to . So I recommend changing harvrefcol->citation. 
 is very rare and poorly maintained and this article only has a few exceptional references which use it. I recommend that these references be switched to  as well.
Since this is (arguably) a change in citation style, please post here if you don't like it, and I will be happy to revert. (I'd actually like to meet someone who prefers  over .  ---- CharlesGillingham (talk) 18:00, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikicite, harvrefcol
Talk:Namakzar

message: I am not sure if the words "Namakzar" in Persian and "Salt Lake" in English refer to the same geographical entity. It looks to me that "Namakzar" does not necessarily contains water. It could be a dried salt lake, while a "Salt Lake" is actually a lake with a high concentration of salt. FakhredinBlog 16:00, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Broken Arrow

message: Someone I know added a disamibugation to this page which was then removed as a dictionary definition - fair enough, he was wrong to put it there.  Interestingly though, I noticed that the existing dictionary definitions that were on the page had also been removed sometime later.  Sometime later again someone "undid" that change.  I have undone the undo since they are clearly dictionary definitions.  See: http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/broken_arrow
If they are not dictionary definitions, then remove them from the wikitionary entry!
--62.49.204.126 16:01, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The entries link to sections of a page, see MoS:DP#URL anchor notation. I have restored them. dissolvetalk 19:46, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

message: One item in the "Other" section appears to flout WP:DISAMBIG#Dictionary definitions. However, it does look like an article on this would meet WP:GNG. See e.g., 
*
*
The term Broken Arrow is used in this context in the Battle of Ia Drang and We Were Soldiers articles. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Target article needed 

message: Online Books Page has an entry for a magazine: https://www.sugarmtn.org/ba/
71.178.191.144 (talk) 11:13, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  additional entry 

message: In the "Vietnam in HD" documentary series reporter Joe Galloway says that is what the CO called and that at the time it was a code for the unit was about to be overrun.  Is that not a real thing?108.18.158.124 (talk) 03:54, 19 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree.  I changed the entry to link to Battle of Ia Drang, which (briefly) mentions the term. Hoof Hearted (talk) 19:02, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  plot device?
Template talk:Queensland cities

message: What is the criteria for being a city? Kerry (talk) 00:29, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely, if anyone would know, I assumed it would be you. So, is this rhetorical, or the beginning of a WP:TfD? As for an answer: one would think that Category talk:Cities in Queensland or Category talk:Towns in Queensland would provide some, but they don't. There's some explanation how this is handled in NSW at List of cities in Australia. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:11, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

text: I actually asked the question more fully at Talk:List of cities in Australia as it's a larger question really than just this template and I wasn't really expecting a response here! It's not rhetorical, because we have a mass of articles, navboxes etc that list random sets of places as "cities". I suspect there is no real answer as town/city appear to be deprecated concepts now officially in Queensland (and I suspect more widely in Australia) due to the way our capital cities have grown to absorb other towns/cities which creates LGAs which may have the title "City" but not with the characteristics that most people infer for a city (a place with a well-defined business centre from which suburbs radiates). So my question is more about what approach would Wikipedians deem acceptable to draw the line of "in" or "out" on certain places being listed as cities. Kerry (talk) 04:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the distraction here; I happen to have watchlisted this template and only saw the main discussion later. As for the substance of the question: I don't have an inkling of an answer, and I suspect there won't be any. The City of Westminster article made me read the introduction to City status in the United Kingdom where it states, "The holding of city status gives a settlement no special rights other than that of calling itself a city". I suspect the same applies in Oz and elsewhere, so it's the equivalent of "how long is a piece of string?" or "how many angels fit on the point of a needle?". That's not something I want to spend any time on. Again, sorry for the distraction. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 08:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose of this template
Talk:Manga murder

message: I edited a small section of this article and Wikipedia sends its dogs after me already. Despite the fact that my edit actually somewhat helped this article seeing as how Light Yagami is actually the antagonist of Death Note not the protagonist.Filthy Wiki-dogs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.63.109.122 (talk) 09:03, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, Viktor's correct. Most protagonists just happen to also be heroic.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 21:32, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's unclear and debatable, even different dictionaries disagree on whether or not protagonist means "hero" or similar.  The role the character plays is rather clear, though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.193.113.148 (talk) 03:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Light Yagami

message: Well what if this has nothing to do with Death Note? "Watashi wa Kira desu" could mean "I am the killer". The cow says MOO!!!  —Preceding undated comment was added at 05:14, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wouldn't matter much for the article. That piece of information would then just have to be added to the content. But fact stays that the media coined the name of this case and suggested references to Death Note, whether it's true or not. Keyy (talk) 14:32, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well... 

message: so theres a seiral killer thinking he is kira.What if he watches Death note so much he becomes a phyco and starts killing people doing bad things such as bullying? What will happen then? or will he kill people who dosent belive in God?
And what if he travels to differnt places so he could thow the police off? And maybe he leaves different clues at his murders? Such as apples or candy?
Your point is?
87.33.65.49 (talk) 12:27, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  manga murder 

message: IF IT HAD SO MUCH ATTENTION LINK IT TO THE JAPANESE VERSION OF THIS PAGE ON THE LOWER LEFT  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.100.173 (talk) 11:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: WHY ARE YOU YELLING AT US? But seriously, is this covered in the Japanese Wiki? Or more preferably (since the crime took place in Belgium) the French or Dutch? Paris1127 (talk) 20:30, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  JAPANESE WIKIPEDIA PAGE
Talk:Joint Electronics Type Designation System

message: Could anyone that knows please explain how the JTEDS system relates to the MDS system? For example, the article below refers to a "tri-service" designation system (also referred to as MDS), but never mentions JTEDS, despite the fact that it appears to describe the JETDS system. It isn't clear whether MDS is an apt description of JTEDS items at all, or whether they are somehow hierarchically related underneath a a common Tri-Service designation system.
US Tri-Service Designation System Electronic Equipment
Thanks. 70.251.240.158 (talk) 19:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MDS? 

message: Would it be possible to create an infobox that describes the JETDS system, so that people stop expanding the description inline, as in AN/APG-66? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.251.33.92 (talk) 18:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: consits of 3 people who are required to keep track of all the radio systems in nato, thay have all the radio records dating back to WWII, but refuse to access them largly becouse thay dont have the manpower, even though the records were all computerized. FOIA or no FOIA, these records will remain locked up forever unless there is the proverbial act of congress, this makes gathering historical statistics on radio production in certain time periods virtually impossible. Brian in denver (talk) 17:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure it would help, but you might try Data.Gov. It's in its initial stages, but I'm optimistic that this kind of data could be requested. 70.251.33.249 (talk) 15:54, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: the JETDS office

message: I added a section with the dates of each published revision.  I got the dates by reading each document Rev D-F, and Rev D states that it :
MIL-STD-196D
19 JANUARY 1985
SUPERSEDING
MIL-STD-196Cs
22 APRIL 1971
so that gave me the exact release date of Rev. C.  I will keep looking for exact dates on Rev -, A and B . Not exactly sure how to 
 <ref>  cite these because the older versions required downloading pdf files from a website. Brian T. McDaniel (tAlk)  19:19, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision History
Talk:Holy Trinity Priory, Aldgate

message: I guess this is the same as the "Priory of Black Canons (monastery of Christ Church) near Aldgate" in the 1894 book A Glossary of Terms Used in Heraldry by James Parker (and see the Shield of the Trinity article), though the variations in terminology are confusing... AnonMoos (talk) 08:21, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate names
Talk:Jaculus (rodent)

message: could someone living close to a major zoo and armed with a camera get some sort of picture to replace the painting. I know those things are pretty fast, but there has to be a way to photograph it. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 05:36, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:History of antisemitism in the United States

message: I noticed that there seems to be a lot of information about specific hate crimes from 2014, presumably from someone writing it back then. Should we delete / condense it? It has a lot of grammatical errors and takes away from the big picture as these incidents are sadly very commonplace now, but I don't want to get flagged for vandalism. Tul10616 (talk) 03:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete content from 2014? 

message: I added some additional detail, but I didn’t add references. References are readily available from the Wikipedia article on General Order 11 if anyone thinks it necessary to duplicate them here. Poihths (talk) 16:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Grant’s order
Talk:Clive Lyle

message: ====w/ Rich====
Hi dude, I wonder if Lyle was neostoic? I pulled this out:
"Neostoicism is a practical philosophy. According to it, the basic rule of good life is: the human should not yield to the passions, but submit to God. There are four passions: the greed, the joy, the fear and the sorrow. Although humans have free will, everything that happens (even if it is wrong, because of human passion) is under control of God and finally it tends to the good."
"The human who complies with this rule is free, because he is not overcome by his instincts. He is also calm, because all the material pleasures and sufferings are irrelevant to him. Finally, he is really, spiritually happy, because he lives close to God."
Kind of conflicts with the amoral apparent atheist we know and love, huh? But some of it fits. MaherCoen (talk) 04:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ChAt

message: Hi dude, I wonder if Lyle was neostoic? I pulled this out:
"Neostoicism is a practical philosophy. According to it, the basic rule of good life is: the human should not yield to the passions, but submit to God. There are four passions: the greed, the joy, the fear and the sorrow. Although humans have free will, everything that happens (even if it is wrong, because of human passion) is under control of God and finally it tends to the good."
"The human who complies with this rule is free, because he is not overcome by his instincts. He is also calm, because all the material pleasures and sufferings are irrelevant to him. Finally, he is really, spiritually happy, because he lives close to God."
Kind of conflicts with the amoral apparent atheist we know and love, huh? But some of it fits. MaherCoen (talk) 04:43, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: w/ Rich
Talk:Genius of Modern Music, Vol. 2

message: First of all, there have been several Monk albums called "Genius of Modern Music, Vol. 2."  There is an earlier CD with an entirely different lineup of songs.  There is also a CD called "Complete Genius of Modern Music" which collects all of volumes 1 & 2 of the earlier CDs.  Though the current CD seems to use artwork from an old LP, the track selections do not remotely match up.  So calling it an "expansion" or "reissue" seems like a misnomer.
Secondly, is it possible that the original was released later in the 1950's?
Sojambi Pinola (talk) 18:28, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing and Misleading 
Talk:Lesser Egyptian jerboa

message: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0094342
©Geni (talk) 05:18, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Fairly new paper
Talk:Australian Aboriginal art

message: i'm doing a school project (borin) on aboriginal art due in for thurs 15th nov but i need to find out where the hell its from other than australia.
cheers
This page apepars to be a duplicate of an out-of-date / early version of Indigenous Australian art. I propose to review its content for any unique / useful material, then delete the rest and make it just a redirect. Let me know if you think its a bad move. Cheers. hamiltonstone (talk) 01:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I reviewed the text of the page. All information is covered or duplicated by the Indigenous Australian art page and the bark painting page. I have accordingly blanked this page and redirected. hamiltonstone (talk) 03:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Concrete cancer

message: I think that maybe this page should be removed from Wiki.  The term "concrete cancer" is highly colloquial and not commonly used.  The discussion of various forms of deterioration of concrete belongs elsewhere, specifically under a subject heading of "concrete durability".  This should be a sub-section of the article on "concrete" but as yet appears not be properly composed.  There is a section on "alkali aggregate reaction"
Concrete needs serious help in Wiki!!
Anubisbro (talk) 05:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I am quite against this suggestion to merge concrete cancer and concrete degradation: although the term may be colloquial, it is largely used, and more specific than the general degradation that can occur from bacterial corrosion, physical damage, thermal damage, etc... This article concentrates on carbonatation due to water penetration and Alkali–silica reaction. I think the subject deserves its own article. — Ludopedia(Talk) 05:37, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concrete Cancer - is this page needed
Talk:Mel Hunter

message: This article is no longer orphaned. It is now referred to (and wikilinked) by the Winston Science Fiction article, and the Hugo Award article. FusionKnight 16:56, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No Longer Orphaned

message: A few possibilities:
*Artists gallery page
*Obituary
*art sample
FusionKnight 23:09, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Society of the Sacred Mission

message: Thank you for adding stuff to this article...however, can you please also add a citation for the new paragraph/section you added? if not, then it is OR and could get wiped. thanks in advance, kind regards Peter morrell 16:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: to which one? The 'beginnings' section I've cited 'History of SSM' by Alistair Mason, and the quote from Kelly I've cited SSM as the source (SSM is the name of the society's published journal as well as the name of the society). The details of the current provincials and visitors I don't think needs citation since it is current. I got the info. in person, when I visited the SSM priory at Willen myself. Oliver Low 16:57, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Long-eared jerboa

message: There seem sto be an edit war going on in the article regarding the name in Russian.  Perhaps someone could write the name out in cyrillic here.  We can try to agree on that and then work out the spelling in the Roman alphabet.  --Aranae (talk) 16:38, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The name is длинноухий тушканчик. Not шушпанчик, as your average Russian internet troll would put it. Dunno how you would spell in Roman, according to English pronunciation (in which case it would be, according to http://say.expressivo.com/, something like “Dleenna-oohi tooshcancheek”, heh), or according to GOST 16876-71: dlinnoukhijj tushkanchik. — 194.44.149.244 (talk) 17:04, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Russian edit war

message: What accounts for the rather large disparity between the IUCN and EDGE classifications?  Perhaps it should be addressed in the article for the sake of clarity. Chick Bowen 15:48, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In addition there is a disparity between the IUCN status listed here and that mentioned in the main jerboa article, where it is said that they are listed as EN. One article or the other should probably be fixed.Mad2Physicist (talk) 22:42, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservation disparity? 

message: It says here http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthpicturegalleries/5966251/The-weirdest-animals-on-Planet-Earth.html?image=6 that it is in risk of extinction
Yet on the main Wiki page it is Least concern  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.244.105.40 (talk) 21:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Red List link  explains why its conservation status was changed in the 2008 publication.  --Aranae (talk) 21:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endangered or Least Concern ?
Talk:Bobby Morrissey

message: Morrissey was also MLA from 1982-96, representing the '1st Prince' district. GoodDay 17:04, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: MLA for 1st Prince (1982-96)
Talk:Long-tailed birch mouse

message: Hi, why is Sicista concolor, a valid taxa, redirected here ? --Salixen (talk) 16:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection 
Talk:Les Edgerton

message: I started this page in recognition of Les Edgerton's contribution to fiction-writing (as evidenced by two books published by Writer's Digest Books). I placed the article under the category of "Authors of books about writing fiction."  
I have never met Edgerton, nor do I have any financial ties to him.  My first contact with him was after I started this page when I sent an email to him to inform him of the page and to ask for his date of birth.  I also indicated that if he preferred not to have the page, I would delete it.  He responded with a gracious thank you, his year of birth, and his current writing activities. Mike Klaassen 17:10, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Las Vegas Plaza

message: Please could someone add the design picture of the Vegas Plaza to this article (i'm not sure how to do it). The picture is here : http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8SSF8TO2&show_article=1&image=large  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.124.67 (talk) 17:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Design Picture
Talk:Clausius–Mossotti relation

message: *We have a red link on maxwell's formula so somethign is spelled wrong.
*The explanation of the variables in the formula is unclear to me.
*The context for the formula needs improvement.
RJFJR 17:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up to do

message: Could somebody please clarify which measurement system is used in formula in the top part of the page? 4π as far as I can see correspond to Gaussian system, but ε0, if it is really the permittivity of vacuum here, is more of SI, isn't it? Thanks in advance. --Esmu Igors (talk) 12:29, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I also got suspicious, and read question and discussion, lecture notes in SI found on the web, the Rysselberghe (1932) and Aspnes (1981) articles in CGS and the Atkins (2010) book. Since Atkins specifically mentions both the SI and CGS versions of polarizability (volume or not) I feel convinced that my edit resolves the ambiguity. --ErikM (talk) 22:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  System of units? 

message: Right now there is both Clausius–Mossotti relation and Lorentz–Lorenz equation; one uses SI and the other CGS, so they seem to be different but they really are saying the same thing. I suggest to give SI and cgs for both equations. --Nanite (talk) 18:23, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed units