Talk:Dimasa Kingdom

message: Need correction. Lets discuss this topic more Himsiringdao (talk) 14:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  13 century to 18th century 

message: Please do keep searching for the historically accurate coat of arms.  Chaipau (talk) 10:37, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of arms 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
* 
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:54, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion 

message: Crossing of Brahmaputra is conflicting with existence of  Kachomari ruins of golaghat and doiyang-dhanshiri ruins. And Hidimbi and Heramba are different kingdoms.   Dima = dhansiri in dimasa language. So, Dimasa should be children of dhansiri. There is lots of confusion. It's better to delete the Kachari ghat part. As per my knowledge kachari ghat was related to involvement of kachari in saraighat war. Mahamnipha was Borahi King .  Kachari history is full of doubts. PerfectingNEI (talk) 08:07, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see a conflict, but Kasomari/Doiyang-Dhansiri are  from a much older period, and currently not associated with Dimasa yet. Chaipau (talk) 13:13, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Kasomari is 6-7th century ruin and Doiyang-Dhansiri started from 2nd century PerfectingNEI (talk) 15:01, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. The not in my comment above should not have been there.  Chaipau (talk) 15:07, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:   Still river crossing doesn't fit brahmaputra because Ambari is in southern side. Actually , The folk story was part of Boro folk story.  And Tezpur is in Upper Assam.  Here , no use of Kachari Ghat. PerfectingNEI (talk) 19:47, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Modification 

message: Some http://dspace.nehu.ac.in/bitstream/1/11414/1/S%20K%20BOSE%2001.pdf PerfectingNEI (talk) 09:01, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This is too similar to the Ahom insignia.  Chaipau (talk) 13:14, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:   Actually that's Ahom insignia only.  There was another but koch insignia PerfectingNEI (talk) 23:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hachengsa rulers and Dimasa coat of armor can be found here 

message: Found one interesting fact of Kachar in 1840  
https://books.google.co.in/books?id=0TQzAQAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false  PerfectingNEI (talk) 21:33, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  Now are you an Ahom language expert?  And how is this relevant?  The Ahoms called Brahmaputra Tilao, after the Kachari name Dilao.  What is the meaning of Tilao?  The land of lao?  The name of a river? Chaipau (talk) 02:01, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Your comment is unrelated. I've added content according to source. I wanted to add more information so I added. You reverted it. I don't understand your intention. I'll given an report to higher administrator. If you wish then I can add content from Fragmented memories by Yasmin Saikia in some pages. PerfectingNEI (talk) 02:10, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Mr. don't ask me meaningless question. According to source , Word isn't Timisha, Word is Ti-Mi-Sha. Which means three words as a phrase. PerfectingNEI (talk) 02:12, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

text: Please don't insert factoids anywhere you want in Wikipedia.  You are not helping Wikipedia one bit by randomly dropping something you discovered somewhere, without any context.  You should not expect others to accept your random discoveries and place them in relevant places. Chaipau (talk) 02:20, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it random discovery ?  Or is the basis of entire history ? I don't expect you to accept my view. I've just added sourced content. I'm not some blind person. Let me , What type book , I should use to insert the same information. I've all type of book. Just tell me your choice.   PerfectingNEI (talk) 02:26, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:   First prove your claim. Where is Tilao ?  PerfectingNEI (talk) 02:28, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Will you please stop your disruptive editing on Wikipedia.  You have only managed to add noise---random, unreliable information.  This is what Terweil (1989) write:  G C Barua's dictionary is not reliable.  You are inserting noise here, nothing else, and that too in the wrong place, out of context.  So I expect you to remove this yourself.Chaipau (talk) 02:55, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't think he had to know Ahom language to produce Ahom dictionary. He might havd brought Tai expert. Which scholar found mistake in his work. Show  me some review paper on his work. I've just added Ti-Mi-Sha which is basis of history. It shouldn't be problem for you.  PerfectingNEI (talk) 02:58, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have given the reference.  Terweil (1989): NEO-AHOM AND THE PARABLE OF THE PRODIGAL SON, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, Deel 145, 1ste Afl. (1989), pp. 125-145.  Now stop WP:DE. If you do not know the subject, please do not insert noise.  Chaipau (talk) 03:03, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ha-Tsung-Tsa and Rang-Tsa 

message: Shouldn't there be separate articles for Timisa & Kachari kingdom ? 
Timisa kingdom was the original kingdom of Dimasas (current Dima Haso district) before it got destroyed by Ahom kingdom. Whereas Kachari kingdom didn't include Timisa kingdom region, but was only restricted to Barak Valley region. Tizen03 (talk) 18:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for Kachari Kingdom & Timisa Kingdom ? 

message: I appropriate your enthusiasm to edit the article however you need to state why you are removing sourced material. I don't know much about this subject however please state why you are removing sections. Please keep in mind no original research is allowed, so bring links as well, or books or anything else. I know nothing on what is being removed all I know is the citations are reliable and the info was removed without any source or reason. If you think the wording is false please make it clear why and state how we should reword it. Thanks. Vallee01 (talk) 06:32, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of sections. 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:52, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Can the Chinese name of Dimasa be used?? Homogenie (talk) 17:18, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: neither the Chinese name nor the Ahom name in the lede makes sense.  No one today calls this historical kingdom by these name.  Chaipau (talk) 17:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Chinese name

message: regarding your revert could you please show where these specific claims have been endorsed?  Please make your claims here instead of edit summaries.  Chaipau (talk) 15:54, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is in Laichen (2000) page 78 Homogenie (talk) 01:22, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ming Shilu