lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Abuelita

message: The following was added by one 63.134.156.121 at 09:29, 2 January 2006.  I didn't feel it was quite up to Wikipedia standards, but it does seem like some useful info.  So if anyone feels like incorporating this into the article in a more scholarly way, go for it, but for now, I'm moving it here to the talk page:
:Hey there all you chilly Locos. Just back from QROO [i.e. Quintana Roo] and was shown the proper way to make mexican hot chocolate, or just called "ChocoLA-te" down there.. Also dee-lish for blending with Kahlua, or the spirit of your choice for a fine happy hour treat.
:We used a medium size saucepan and filled it 2/3 of the way with water and heated it to a boil. Turn down the heat. Use a whole box of Ibarra, or Abuelita Mexican chocolate tablets. That's right, the whole box. Break up the chocolate into the hot water and when it's melted, stir in a large can of evaporated milk. DONE! I never got it right until now. It's so yummy. Chill for the happy hour bevs.
:The Ibarra or Abuelita chocolate can be found in many grocery stores with hispanic sections, or at Mexgrocer.com. I hope you try it and let me know how it turns out!
Severinus 09:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps a Wikibooks Cookbook for Abuelita?  Kylu (talk) 03:02, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Citation needed for " It was originally invented in Mexico in 1963."
If "Abuelita has been a staple Mexican product for more than 60 years..." 
then it would have been "invented" before 1954.
Ammobox (talk) 15:07, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation requests 

message: This entire page and its edit history is a mess of pointless and banal grievances and flame wars. The results of this petty, digital squabbling are clearly evidenced in the words themselves as they are largely nonsensical and wildly biased. I’m not familiar enough with the subject matter to do it myself otherwise I would but hopefully some kind chocolate-loving editor can rewrite this article into something deserving of being preserved on Wikipedia. Babykitsune (talk) 03:05, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:LeMat Revolver

message: There's a much more detailed discussion of the LeMat revolver under the heading LeMat: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LeMat
I suggest that merging what info is in this article with the other one. Besides, this one needs to be cleaned up. I don't think statements like "...that fired a .63 buckshot round that could blow a man's head off." are particularly informative...
I second that. not sure how to merge articles though... Hellfire83 15:35, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll just remove the offending igorant statement for now :)--Stevekl 19:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:East Hoathly with Halland

message: The original article confused the parish name with the village name: two separate places Peter Shearan 09:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Doesn't East Hoathly bonfire society generally only do the Cowboy's and Indians theme? 
When I lived there in the 80s/90s each of the surrounding village’s societies had a different theme. I can't remember who the Vikings or Military themed societies were though.
217.154.74.244 14:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Costumes 

message: The article here sets out the Wikipedia notes on writing about settlements. It specifies headings (although, with smaller places like this, they can be adjusted), and makes it clear that all and any statements are backed by a reference. Hence the rewrite. The article now talks about the civil parish as a whole, specifying where possible which part of the parish. This too is specified in the notes: that a civil parish article should incorporate its component parts within it; this reduces the need for having separate article about the smallest of places - and with it, the number of stubs. 
Incidentally, I note that the fireworks disaster actually occurred in the neighbouring parish of Ringmer, which is West Sussex (see reference 10)although the media called it Halland. Peter Shearan (talk) 09:45, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite of article
Talk:Rebop Kwaku Baah

message: The second paragraph in the article was copied from the AllMusic Guide. I have removed the paragraph. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 09:53, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Finally, the debate over whether he is alive or not is resolved, thanks to someone who's added some references. This has been one of the most troublesome articles I've had to deal with.--HisSpaceResearch 03:04, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed copyvio

message: So why does the title Rebop not agree with the text Reebop? Can't this be rationalized?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.85.143.24 (talk) 15:16, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title? 
Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections January 2006/Vote/Everyking

message: As per election rules/procedure, neutral votes/comments moved from vote page by E Pluribus Anthony 10:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral

message: : Non-votes (not invalid votes) moved from voting page
#:I do not have suffrage, so don't know if my opinion counts or not, but the oppose comments by Worldtravelor (32) and Thrydulf (85) are very worrying. 62.25.109.195 13:23, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Template talk:User asl-4

message: This template should be called User ASL-4 not asl-4. But I want to question the need for level 4 with sign langauges anyway; i'll post my reasoning at Category talk:User sgn. ntennis 10:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: User ase supercedes this template. Taric25 06:04, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nick Raynsford

message: As shown on Greenwich_&_Woolwich/ukpollingreport, the constituency was created in 1997, which is when Raynsford was elected; therefore there can be no predecessor.  His current term thus started in 1997 - the five years preceding this, he was representative of a different constituency.  (Technically, perhaps the current term should be listed as having started in 2010, when he was last re-elected?) ~ tajasel (talk • contribs) 14:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In reply to User:SE7's comment, left on my Discussion page instead of here: I can't say I'm entirely convinced by the common practice described; it's basically giving false information to say that Raynsford had a predecessor when he was actually the first person to be elected into the seat called "Greenwich & Woolwich".  I recognise the desire not to have a huge infobox, and see the byline stating that he was previously MP for Greenwich as reasonable, but it is factually incorrect and potentially confusing to users to say that he wasa) elected to Greenwich & Woolwich before the seat even existed;b) that Rosie Barnes served in the seat before him.As it does indeed appear to be "common practice" to have infoboxes display dates this way, I won't kick off an edit war, but I really do think this is a bad approach to listing predecessors and dates of elected terms and should be reconsidered. ~ tajasel (talk • contribs) 23:56, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree it isn't perfect, and infoboxes should be made clearer, but there's unfortunately no middle way, as yet.SE7Talk/Contribs 00:34, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits to infobox
Talk:Grove (nature)

message: Removed:
:The use of the word implies human creation or intervention.
::A Sequoia grove (cited as an example) is natural, and not a human creation
:For cultivation, spacing and layout are important, and vary according to which species of tree is planted. Grove layout must 
:* enable the planned number of tree to obtain the maximum exposure to sunlight during all stages of growth
:* allow for the efficient operation of harvesting equipment 
::Spacing and layout are important in tree cultivation whatever the situation; they don't make, or not make, it a grove, and are completely irrelevant to whether the term 'grove' is used or not.
::MPF 10:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Could a grove possibly be described in a simple way as a 'Miniature Forest?' Or would that be innacurate.
No.  I've checked a few dictionaries, and I think Merriam-Webster sums it up best:  "A wood without underbrush"  (thus including a grove of sequioa)   or "a planting of fruit or nut trees."  The wood without underbrush can encapsulate both and touches on the German senses of the words "Hain" and the archaic "Rode."   BohemianRhapsodie (talk) 17:38, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mini Forest? 

message: redirects here - what is it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.115.204.102 (talk) 14:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  arbor
Talk:Ladislaus Hengelmüller von Hengervár

message: ===Stage 1===
Stage 1 is to put  tags around external links.
===Stage 2===
Stage 2 is to name the references, e.g http://www.site.com to Trees Website or even better {{cite web | url=http://www.site.com |title=Trees Website | work=Pine Trees | accessdate=2007-12-29 For non-website links see Wikipedia:Citation templates
===Stage 3===
Stage 3 is to move all the references in the 'References for movement into main article' section to the article where you can fit them dont forget to compare them to current references.
===Stage 4===
Check all references have access dates and are in correct formatΩ§|Blacksmith2 07:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Check all references have access dates and are in correct formatΩ§|Blacksmith2 07:06, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stage 4

message: List any problems or questions here.Ω§|Blacksmith2 09:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems

message: Stage 1 complete, have left some links in works.2 all except refrences to be moved into main article. stage 3 has had them converted ref tags but not yet placed in article.Ω§|Blacksmith2 09:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Status
Talk:List of rulers of Shewa

message: Following lords were not any sorts of RULERS of Shewa. Even the existence of some of them is dubious.
died c.1535 	Prince Yaqob Lebna Dengel 	
???? 	Prince Seqwe Qal Yaqob 	
???? 	Prince Werede Qal Segwe Qal 	
???? 	Prince Lebsa Qal Werede Qal
The list needs some NPOVing. 217.140.199.247 10:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Anaphrodisiac

message: Shouldn't this article be somehow linked to hypersexuality? I mean, that's why you'd probably use an anaphrodisiac anyway, right? This article needs a doctor. Alex.g 10:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shouldn't

message: "Cocaine is also found to be an anaphrodisiac in that it may inhibit a man's ability to get an erection." Compare that to this quote from the aphrodisiac article "Drugs like Viagra are not aphrodisiacs because they do not have any mood effect." Does cocaine actually inhibit desire?--Nonpareility 15:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cocaine

message: I believe both Corn Flakes and Graham crackers were both intended as anaphrodisiacs, is this worth mentioning in the article? --GSchjetne 14:01, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can find a reliable source to reference, sure.--Nonpareility 15:16, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it is a standard held belief that Mr. Kellogs found this property to be a plus, since he saw himself as a moral refomenr, but yes, a source would be good yamaplos 04:27, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corn Flakes 

message: Treatment of Hypersexuality lists drugs that can be used to inhibit sexual desire is giving a 404.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.134.44.90 (talk) 18:31, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  404 

message: But it was still pretty bad. Not only unencyclopedic, but read like an ad for herb pills. Eventually with some refs it may be worthwhile, but right now it's still badly in need of some data. SBHarris 05:18, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I've cleaned this article up a bit

message: thanks. 79.179.6.105 (talk) 22:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could the editors please simplify the part "Scientific study" a bit? 

message: The following makes little sense:
"In medieval times and modern times, Turks have used Alum for Anaphrodisiac.[2] Also there is a myth among soldiers that cooker mixes Alum with foods in Turkey.[3] Government has no claims for using Alum in military foods."
"As a Turk, I can confirm that statement."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.42.25.46 (talk) 21:50, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Toc-H Public School

message: ----
I have permission. Please revert it back. :X 
thunderboltz
*I don't see anything on that site about being released under the GDFL so I had no reason to assume wikipedia could use it. We have to be careful about copyright because if someone posts content here when they don't have the right to, wikipedia is cooperating with an illegal act. Unfortunately this happens all the time. Kappa 11:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

message: Please add a "References" section to this article.  And include reliable 3rd party sources that confirm claims, such as it being the most well known in the area.  --Rob 20:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add references 
Talk:Ayumi Shibata

message: Ayumi Shibata is currently active in Gatas and has been doing tours with Melon Kinen-Bi.
:Please provide some context as at present it seems like a non-notable biography.-localzuk 10:59, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears someone also agrees with you so I have added a context template instead. Sorry if I seemed a bit quick off the mark.-localzuk 11:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Disambiguation pages/Archive 13

message: Would anyone like to take a look at Akita and Talk:Akita?  Thanks!  Tedernst | talk 22:19, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: My suggestion - walk away from the page for 20 weeks or more then come back. User:Ceyockey 22:27, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you (Tedernst) may be taking too hard of a line with your edits. While I generally dislike categorizing dab pages, sometimes it is unavoidable and I don't think there is any hard and fast rule against it. Similarly, some of the "extra" information on that page is helpful for understanding which link is intended. I think the extra links are unnecessary, but the verbiage is not so excessive as to get in the way. older≠wiser 22:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *sigh*... I guess Ceyockey's got a good way of going about it.  Don't let it discourage you, Tedernst, there are other pages, thousands of them.  Neonumbers 23:46, 28 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Well, I had a stab at it too, and after a revert (putting back largely pointless Japanese text) I think it's at a pretty reasonable state. Thanks/wangi 23:51, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Akita 

message: Are there no prohibitions on categories for dab pages? Tedernst | talk 06:11, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They are deprecated by implication, as there is no explicit mention of them in the style guideline. But similarly there is no prohibition against them that I am aware of. older≠wiser 13:08, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

text: There tends to be two cases where categories get added, one where all of the entries belong to a particular class (like everything is a place in the United States or everything is a ship name) and the other where someone has just chosen to single out one entry among many unrelated ones for categorization.  The all-entries-belong-to-one-class seems to have been the origin of some of the dab-templates which have been the source of some strife for the past couple of months.  The main argument against categorizing dab pages for me is that when one looks at a category that contains both dab pages and articles it is not clear which is which, and that could be quite frustrating to readers I think.  Do you have particular cases in mind that you want to either add categories to or remove categories from? User:Ceyockey 04:03, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  categories
Wikipedia talk:Featured picture candidates/Image:Braunrückentukan.jpg

message: ======
thumb|350px| Ramphastos swainsoni
This is a portrait of the ramphastos swainsoni
*Nominate and support cele4 10:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Malformed nomination (kept here for historical archive)

message: thumb|350px| Ramphastos swainsoni
This is a portrait of the ramphastos swainsoni
*Nominate and support cele4 10:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Braunrückentukan.jpg|Featured picture candidates/Image:Braunrückentukan.jpg]]
Talk:Karthik (actor)

message: move as uncontested. --regentspark (comment) 21:45, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: I think "Karthik (actor)" would be fine with the page as he is commonly known with the name. But isn't there a Bollywood actor by the name of Karthik?? Secret of success Talk to me 05:48, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for late reply, but a great job Vensatry. -- Karthik Nadar (talk) 14:14, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karthik (actor) 
Talk:Arvind Swamy

message: The introductory lines of this wiki page say Date of Birth as 18 June 1965 whereas in "Early life" section, date of birth is mentioned as 2 July 1967.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Veerendra.dhupkar (talk • contribs) 07:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This may have been vandalism, various IPs have been changing the date rather randomly. It now reads 1970 per the cited source. January (talk) 16:34, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDB, blogs and forums are not considered reliable sources, especially not for biographical information. I have removed the disputed date, but of course a properly sourced value could be re-added. If the value remains unclear or different reliable sources report different values, the information should be skipped altogether. GermanJoe (talk) 15:02, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion over date of Birth of the person 

message: The article is titled SwamY, but the content of the article is SwamI. Which is the correct spelling? If both are used, this should be noted in the lede. -- The Red Pen of Doom 17:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: 9 years later, I have the same question!!! — DaxServer (talk to me) 17:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of the name
Talk:CFLY-FM

message: :"The stations were acquired by CHUM Limited in 1998..."
The connection between CKLC and CHUM goes back further; CHUM was owned by members of the Waters family, CKLC/CFLY were owned by another member of that same family and carried rebranded versions of programming such as "CHUM Reports" at least 15 - 20 years prior to official acknowledgement that CKLC was a CHUM-owned entity. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 03:29, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:A Maximum High

message: Why is there no mention of Out By My Side being an obviously copied version of The Rolling Stones' Back Street Girl ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wavydavy68 (talk • contribs) 13:26, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Rolling Stones - Back Street Girl
Talk:Muhammad of Ghor

message: Request for check year of death mohomad ghor is killed by our smrat prithviraj singh chauhan but prithvi is also died in 1992. Vikaschauhanji (talk) 12:23, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Prithviraj led a coalition of several Rajput kings and defeated the Ghurid army led by Muhammad Ghori near Taraori in 1191 AD. 103.27.49.37 (talk) 16:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for check year of death mohomad ghor is killed by our smrat prithviraj singh chauhan but prithvi is also died in 1192. 

message: Re:Packer and Tracker: I hope you don't mind, but I am making a quick prose and coherence check in the lead so that your passage through the GA will be smoother.  All the best, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 18:57, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've stopped after the first paragraph in the lead.  I recommend that a WP:GOCE copy edit be requested before the GA submission.  It will save a lot of time in the GA review.  All the best, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 19:55, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Making a quick prose check in the lead 

message: I highly recommend anyone interested in this article to comment on Wikipedia talk:NCROY#Other pages for disambiguation. This ruler's predecessor is also a Muhammad and bears the same regnal name of another state. If that article is moved to something like "Muhammad of the Ghurids", then it will more or less the same as this article. My suggestion is to move this article to Mu'izz al-Din Muhammad, which already redirects here, and I guess there is no other ruler with that name. Aintabli (talk) 17:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We had a discussion last year on it and a consensus was established to use Muhammad of Ghor throughout the article instead of Muizz al-Din. Re Pa©ker&Tra©ker (♀) 05:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Indian campaigns of Muhammad of Ghor#Requested move 11 February 2024 that may be of interest to watchers of this page. Schierbecker (talk) 17:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Indian campaigns of Muhammad of Ghor#Requested move 11 February 2024]] 

message: The leader of khokhars was Ram lal khokhar who was a Jats and also khokhar were jats who assassinated him so please change it Samarth099 (talk) 04:21, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The leader of khokhars was Ram lal khokhar who was a Jats and also khokhar were jats who assassinated him so please change it
Talk:Glasgow Valley County Airport

message: I know this airport is actually called "Glasgow Airport", but shouldn't this be a disambg page with links to all the Glasgow Airports (including Glasgow International and Prestwick)? --87.74.27.64 11:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: A large amount of un-referenced information about Glasgow Air Force Base has been added to this article recently.  I'm moving these data to that article, since it belongs there.  I'll maintain a reference to Glasgow AFB, here to direct readers. --Ltvine | Talk 22:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, information about the former AFB doesn't apply to Glasgow's civilian airport -- they're two separate fields. The former AFB is actually several miles north of town at a place called St. Marys, while the civilian airport referenced by this article is right on the edge of Glasgow. The AFB info really doesn't belong in this article and should be restored to a separate article. McGehee (talk) 17:25, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Glasgow Air Force Base]]
Talk:Changing places

message: Hi - could the person who highlighted this article as requiring wikifying please list what needs doing and I'll take care of it?  Alternatively, could that person make the changes themselves?  Cheers! Visual Error 11:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified

message: The concept of 3rd person objectivity is that by writing about 3rd person experiences you write about something that someone else can verify, especially if you test many subject therefore accounting for personal variations in subjective perception. If you were to write about your own experiences you can pretty much say anything and no one can falsify or test it.
For example compare:
"Every time i see red color i hear static noise"  
"Every time a subject sees red color he hears static noise"
Now if I base some theories on the first statement no one will ever be able to test it, however if I base it on second statement others can relate to it, by testing some subjects.
But the real claim to objectivity lies not in 1st or 3rd person of narrative but in number of cases tested and attempts to minimize observer biases. 
What I think the author of this thought experiment implies is that experimenter thinks his subject's experience is more objective than his own would be. This seems a bit silly. The real idea of the experimenter is that he can test many subjects and find common elements. This is what i would call a "practical objectivity".
Or do i miss the point of this experiment?
Kezorm (talk) 15:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I don't get it