lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Claire Moore (singer)

message: Excellent work by Gordonofcartoon Artwinters 00:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. No problem at all with her notability; just with her article being used as a vehicle to advertise BJT. Gordonofcartoon 01:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lex Saxonum

message: The translation of this document into English is rather unintelligible. I could try a translation myself but I fear my German skills fall short of what would be needed for such a task. Besides which, a translation from the Latin to English would probably be preferable . --KobaVanDerLubbe (talk) 19:29, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. My German is good enough to translate. But where is the original source? I clicked on the German version and it is not there.  :(  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.74.198.130 (talk) 02:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Google Translate? Really? There is a German translation here. I gave my best on the first five chapters, you might want to build from there. -- 145.228.61.4 (talk) 15:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation
Talk:Tennessee State Route 5

message: Hey, I saw that you intend to enhance the quality of the article to B-class. That is a great idea and a good start. Here are a few suggestions.
 
===Photo===
I saw that you have requested a map already. How about adding a photo in addition to that? Photos can be a nice way to enhance the article quality without many words. A nice scenic view or so with the state route sign on the side of it would look great.
**Work in Progress.  I'll be driving to Mississippi next week and should be able to take pictures during my trip.  Some of these will be added to a future US 45 in Tennessee article as well.  Pepper6181 00:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article improvement

message: I saw that you have requested a map already. How about adding a photo in addition to that? Photos can be a nice way to enhance the article quality without many words. A nice scenic view or so with the state route sign on the side of it would look great.
**Work in Progress.  I'll be driving to Mississippi next week and should be able to take pictures during my trip.  Some of these will be added to a future US 45 in Tennessee article as well.  Pepper6181 00:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: I noticed that the measurements for the counties traversed are in miles only. To make the article easy to understand for readers worldwide or people who are not accustomed to the non-metric measurements, you might consider adding another column with kilometers.
**Done Deal Pepper6181 00:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Measurements

message: In the history section you state that the original SR-5 followed a much different route. That is interesting. Do you think there is a chance to get a map showing the original route of SR-5? That would certainly not be a strict requirement for B-class but a very nice way to illustrate the changes the road went through over time.
**I'm working on histories for this route as well as several others, the only reliable TDOT map source that I have access to is the State Archives Building in Nashville, they do have things though that go back before 1930 though.  This can be considered Work in Progress. Pepper6181 00:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Some road articles have a Sub-header "Points of interest" along the route (below the counties traversed), showing a list of interesting sights or so that are close to the road. The good effect of that also is that your article gets more Wikilinks that are not other roads, counties or cities. And it makes the article more interesting for a wider audience.
**A list of these are being compiled, mostly state parks, national parks, etc.,etc.  Work in Progress. Pepper6181 00:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Points of interest
Talk:Tennessee State Route 69

message: The sides of the road has grown up with bushes, weeds and looks awful. When it was State hwy the side were cut mowed and looked so clean 
.I was shocked how bad it looks.  I grew up on that hwy. I remember when it was still a gravel rd...what year was it proved to a nice paved road?  I was to young to remember thr year. 2600:1700:3530:10B0:5D42:F164:836C:4EB2 (talk) 13:44, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Tennessee State Route 300

message: This merger doesn't have to occur yet, but when I-69 is signed along TN 300 or extended north from US 51, I suggest this article be merged into I-69 in TN as it is apart of the Corridor. EBGamingWiki (talk) 14:49, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger with Interstate 69 in Tennessee 

message: (The following is a comment posted on the I-40, I-240, and I-55 TN pages, which all claim overlaps with I-69.  I hadn't realized when I drafted the first copy of this comment that SR 300 treats I-69 as "future".  Wikipedia, inconsistency is thy name....)
There has been a bit of an edit war on the I-269 page, with the dust settling on a claim that Wikipedia should not recognize the extension of the interstate designation as official until there is documentation that TDOT has recognized the change, even if federal approvals have been granted.
This begs the question: for I-69 in Tennessee, is there any documentation in support of TDOT recognizing the designation as official?  It's obviously been approved by AASHTO and FHWA; TDOT is almost certainly going to sign it as such if/when the new sections get built.  But at the moment, I don't see any documentation that TDOT officially agrees that the overlap section of I-55/I-240/I-40/SR 300 really is I-69 today.  There's just a bunch of internet lore, much of it referencing Wikipedia, that TDOT will sign it "someday".
(This comment is being added all of I-40/I-240/I-55/TN 300.  More detail on I-269 talk page.) MikeTheActuary (talk) 04:57, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-69 Overlap Officialness
Talk:Pirates of the Third Reich

message: The "Siamese twins" were not siamese twins, but identical twins that had been sewn together at their backs. This is a copy of one of Dr. Josef Mengele's human experiments during WWII. One twin is dead upon his discovery by Catherine Willows, while the other dies later of infection. This experiment and others were referenced in the episode such as the injection of dyes into patients eyes in an attempt to change eye color. --71.232.149.9 08:12, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies in the episode summary
Talk:Robert Kates

message: The "Critique" section is rare in Wiki biographies.  This one is without references to the works cited.  Moreover, the Critique and the one referenced work do not reflect the person's most recent work, including a 2006 book on Hurricane Katrina.  The Critique is more of a political statement than a scholarly statement.  Badly written, too.
TollandRCR (talk) 23:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:San Gorgonio Pass wind farm

message: This is not technically correct. There are numerous different wind farms within the San Gorgonio Pass area. It is not one "farm". A "farm" connotates one facility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.199.76.33 (talk) 18:26, 7 July 2007
:Should this be renamed "San Gorgonio Pass wind farms"? --—WWoods (talk) 19:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be useful to add in some information about who runs the wind farm(s), as at present there is no reference to who operates the San Gorgonio Pass farm(s). I believe that it is run by Southern California Edison (and they are mentioned in the article in relation to the power line), but this would need clarification. Bethmenzies (talk) 16:24, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A table similar to SEGS would be nice; showing the owners, sizes, etc of different farms. Rehman(+) 01:03, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wind farm 

message: It would be nice to have a chart with actual electricity produced on a yearly basis for this facility.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.97.230.205 (talk) 20:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual electricity production
Talk:HMAS Ipswich (FCPB 209)

message: Two photos would be good additions to the article. The first would be of the ship herself. The second would be of the memorial in Ipswich, Queensland, which has just been unveiled. -- saberwyn 03:58, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested photos
Talk:Sno Balls

message: I think it would be good for this article to have a picture of a Sno-ball, maybe a picture of a whole one and then one cut in half. Anyone want to contribute a picture? If not, maybe I'll see if I can get a hold of one and take a picture. flod logic 01:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Not exactly what I would call neutral, what with the unverified claims of being an 'instant hit', etc.
Sappho'd (talk) 21:48, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reads like a commercial!

message: It is says here that these cakes are normally pink, but most of the ones that I have seen are brown, except for the white which is the dessicated coconut around it. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 11:50, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Are these cakes really pink?

message: We should not be including indiscriminate information or unreliable sources in this article. Do you have a reliable secondary source indicating the significance of this reference? Nikkimaria (talk) 23:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop culture section
Talk:Farmer Jack

message: I think Borman's, Inc. introduced a discount food concept in the mid-60s. Units were usually co-located with or nearby to discount dry goods retailer like Shoppers Fair or Arlan's. It seemed that the brand dwindled as those discount department stores declined and Borman's own Farmer Jack brand grew.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.121.16.240 (talk) 11:52, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sav-On Foods
Talk:Barophile

message: It has been proposed that Barophile and Piezophile be merged. They should be merged because both terms refer to the same thing. See extremophile, carleton.edu, and nstl.gov.cn. -- kenb215 talk 01:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge these are synonyms. I don't know which is preferable. Bendž|Ť 14:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Alfred Aetheling

message: Two sentences in the article currently read, "England was conquered by Canute of Denmark later that year, and Alfred and Edward returned to the court of their uncle, Duke Robert of Normandy. There is some evidence of a plan on the part of Duke Robert to invade England on his nephews' behalf."
The Duke of Normandy at the time was Richard II of Normandy. There was also Richard III of Normandy before Robert I of Normandy, who was not their uncle. They did have an uncle called Robert, but he was apparently Count of Evreux. This information has been in the article since the merge, and it was in that article for years. I can't check the source, because it's a book. McLerristarr | Mclay1 20:08, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duke Robert?
File talk:BiAnyOtherName.jpg

message: we believe that we have correctly followed procedures to ameliorate any fair use issues regarding an image of the book cover, where the book itself is the topic of the article, if there are any lingering concerns please address us in person rather than just slapping bot tags on everything BiAndBi 01:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book Cover Fair Use Issues
Template talk:Epithelial neoplasms

message: What happened to the rest of the former Template:Tumors? --Una Smith 01:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

message: This template now links to Medullary, a redirect to Medulla, a disambiguation page.  This link is not helpful to non-specialist readers (like me), because it gives no indication of what type of medulla is intended and which of the several links on the disambiguation page might be relevant.  Please re-point this link to a relevant article.  --Russ (talk) 11:33, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right on that one. I just removed the link to the concrete from two other cancer related pages. Hopefully no one will question it in terms of the crystalline silica link when you're grinding down concrete and then still think it's related to specific cancer topics...--Achim (talk) 00:20, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation needed
Talk:Petiole (botany)

message: I read on Musa_(genus) that “some reaching up to 9 m (30 ft) in height or 18 m (59 ft) in the case of Musa ingens. The large herb is composed of a modified underground stem (rhizome), a false trunk of tightly rolled petioles” - would this not make the petioles of a musa ingens the longest there are? 20040302 (talk) 09:39, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musa / Banana
Category talk:Wikipedian scuba divers

message: This category was recently removed from all userboxes in which it was included.  However, the reason given that the category "does not foster contribution" does not fall under the criteria for speedy deletion (Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion). I have therefore undone the deletions and ask for further explanation here before any action is taken.  Benstrider 02:20, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing has been deleted. The category was just removed from the userboxes, and ^demon's bot had nothing to do with it. You should be civil, and remember that Wikipedia is not MySpace. --Coredesat 03:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

text: The general consensus seems to be that people adding themselves to categories manually is ok, but adding them automatically from a userbox is rather frowned upon, as it gives a false impression of the number of people who actually want that category (as you know, there are many people who add dozens upon dozens of userboxes, even if they don't necessarily dive, for example) ^demon[omg plz] 08:41, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I was referring to the mass-deletion and purging of user categories that has been happening at WP:UCFD for the past few weeks. ^demon[omg plz] 11:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of category deletion
Talk:Storrs, Connecticut

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. The consensus below is that this move is not supported by WP:COMMONNAMEcommon name. (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 19:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Storrs, Connecticut →  – According to the USPS ZIP Code Lookup tool, the recommended city names for 06268 and 06269 are "Storrs-Mansfield, CT" - "Storrs" is an accepted shorthand substitution, but should not represent the community on its own. Jonathanhusky (talk) 18:49, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 September 2023
Talk:Lackawanna Old Road

message: The relationship of these two sections of track needs to be presented in a clearer fashion.  Without a map, the discussion can get very confusing since the Warren Railroad was a subset of the Old Road, the latter which really didn't come into existence as a known entity until the Cut-Off opened.  A map showing the Old Road, the Warren Railroad and the Lackawanna Cut-Off would be very helpful.WallyFromColumbia (talk) 18:49, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Road vs. Warren Railroad
Talk:The Word on the Street (book)

message: i WAS READING THIS AND i JUST COULDN'T HELP BUT LOL. i SUPPOSE IT IS A FAIRLY GOOD TRANSLATION, BUT i'VE NEVER HEARD THE BIBLE PUT LIKE THAT.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.252.86.170 (talk) 19:51, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LOL
Talk:OmniFocus

message: Researching the release date of version 1.0. It's not in the history section. I'd like to know when the first version of this software came out and the release dates for subsequent versions. Alpha and beta release dates would also be interesting.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Timwayne (talk • contribs) 20:39, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section should include history - with dates
Talk:José Antonio Llama

message: Please be careful when editing the references, they are in a format that links back to the original, removing the original mention will destory the rest of them. Thank you. --74.73.16.230 02:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates
Talk:Alyutors

message: The Alyutors article is more complete, and Alyutor or Aliutor is preferred spelling over Alutor. --Bejnar (talk) 21:27, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As there was no comment in over a month, I completed the merger. --Bejnar (talk) 23:10, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from Alutor to Alyutors
Talk:Bruce Jones (surfboards)

message: OK, its a more complete and referenced article.  With what I could find for now.  Perhaps other wikipedians can find/add more and perhaps its got enough to stay now... --- BMcCJ 04:02, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totally Updated Article 

message: This article was tagged because it sounds like an obituary.  Only one sentence was added after his death and the tenses changed.  What specifically makes it sound like an obituary? Bahooka (talk) 05:37, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obituary 

message: While these are good quotes with refs, the reader has no idea who made the remarks. Are these folks notable? Are they well known in the sport itself? Anyone can say nice things about another human, well deserved or not. These come off as being without ‘weight’ without the source of the comment (meaning who uttered the words, not where the quotes came from). Got here after reading ‘The Pump House Gang’ by Tom Wolfe so I could learn more the folks from his writing. Thanks to all who have contributed to this article. THX1136 (talk) 20:50, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recognition section
Talk:Ladies Professional Wrestling Association

message: I suggest merging this promotion's championships onto this main page. The promotion only lasted for approximately two years, and the championship lists are short. There is no point in having separate pages. If there are no objections in about a week, I'll go ahead and merge everything. Nikki311 01:26, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Pre-adhesive mail

message: This article includes the redirect from "stampless cover", so post-adhesive and even modern stampless covers could be legitimate illustrations for this.  In theory there could be two articles, but the paucity of content suggests a single more-inclusive article. Stan (talk) 17:33, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Pre-adhesive mail" is a confusing title; apparently it's short for "Pre-adhesive-stamp mail."  That's more accurate, but a lousy title.  "Lettersheet" technically would only seem to apply where a sheet (either with a letter or a blank cover sheet) is folded to then pass through the mail, and might not include actual envelopes.  In any event, that term primarily applies to printed postal stationery.  "Stampless cover" might be a better title and could include all the material from the 15th century (with or without postal markings) up to the issuance of adhesive stamps and beyond, such as Mexico's sellos negros, Confederate stampless covers and congressional frankings.  Ecphora (talk) 18:34, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  pre-adhesive vs stampless
Talk:PWI Match of the Year

message: Has anyone considered adding the runner up matches to this article?  THX-1138 03:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  runner up 

message: Why are the matches only WWE? ROH has had so many better matches than HBK vs McMahon last year —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.188.64.5 (talk • contribs) 
:That's because WWE (and, to a point, TNA) is pretty much all PWI cares about. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 19:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  wwe only 

message: Wasn't the 1993 Match of the year (Marty Jannety vs. Shawn Michaels) their Rematch in July 1993 on monday Night Raw??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DrRisk13 (talk • contribs) 22:48, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1993 Match of the year
Talk:Religious views on truth

message: Discussion with who?  The cannot be multiple definitions of Truth.  oxymoron 
Thank you.. -mapsurfer
This article was split from the main article Truth after discussion.  History before 03:22, 8 July 2007(UTC) can be found there. Banno 03:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: I have simply copied the content of Truth#Religious views to here, leaving a copy of the first paragraph on the old site as a lead-in to this article. More work need sot be done to synchronise the two articles. Banno 03:25, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synchronise 

message: The opening section states, "Each religion sees itself as the only path to truth."  with no citation.  
This statement should be deleted or re-written, unless we can show evidence that all religious traditions make this claim. As it stands, this article has no representation from North America, South America, Africa, Australia or Oceania.  It is even missing Taoism. Most obvious to me is the Religious syncretism from Japan where Japanese authors often proudly state that Japan officially recognizes that their society has a long tradition of embracing both Buddhism and Shintoism, two religious views that share different aspects of truth.
The religions listed in this article all happen to be religious institutions that have had state sponsorship that allowed them to grow past their original national borders. If that is to be a limiting factor for this Wikipedia article, perhaps the title of the page should reflect that to the effect of something like: Views on truth from the point of view of state sponsored religious institutions. Otherwise, I would like to see more representation from Hawaiian religion, Dogon religion, Hopi mythology, Religion in the Inca Empire, etc.
In various degrees even the institutional religions listen on this page, such as Christianity, have histories of religious syncretism. Christianity is influenced by Judaism in its founding mythology, the Isis-Horus-Osiris mythology for its holy trinity and resurrection mythology, Stoicism for its monastery conventions, and other Greek and Roman ideas of underworld mythology.   In other words, Christianity is a collection of "truths." Akashicorca (talk) 21:07, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Religious Representation  / Narrow Definition of Religion
Talk:The Blast (magazine)

message: Is it appropriate that this historical newspaper should have the AK Press template on its page, just because AK re-published it? It takes up a fair amount of the page, but is surely not a very notable aspect of the paper? BobFromBrockley (talk) 12:01, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reset the template so that it doesn't automatically expand, so that might help the undue prominence aspect, but the broader issue is a bit thornier: the general rule is that all articles within the scope of a navigational footer template like  should be linked from it and should transclude it at the bottom. So I suppose if this norm is upheld the question is whether or not the scope of the template might be a little broad to be useful in all cases. Skomorokh 12:23, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. That's better. I'm not sure on the thornier issue. Seems to be good for, e.g. Ramsey Kanaan but less so for e.g. John Yates, so maybe it's an issue of who is in the template. There are also several AK books, so the list seems a little arbitrary. Are these the most notable? Or somehow especially exemplary of AK? BobFromBrockley (talk) 14:06, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  AK Press template