lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Seven Sisters (oil companies)

message: The result was Do not merge into Supermajor. The discussion has lasted for nearly nine months with no concensus. -- Wassupwestcoast 13:27, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote Do Not Merge, the Seven Sisters oil companies is a well known concept/entity that deserves its own article. They helped shaped the oil industry for a large part of the 20th century. --Rajah 11:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I think it would make sense to merge is under Supermajors as it's own section, and indicate that the Seven Sisters were a precursor to today's supermajors. Then redirect this page there. I think adding the two together would give a much more complete story about the history of the oil giants and they fit together quite well into a single article. Jawsdog 17:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Support per Jawsdog. Beagel 16:34, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not merge 

message: I removed the reference to this in the Road Warrior sub-section as there is no previous mention of this supposed conspiracy theory. --Rajah 11:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  conspiracy theory?

message: The mention of the Seven Sisters Logo is mentioned in the Road Warrior reference, yet there is no indication anywhere (on this page) of what that logo is and/or consists of.  Long story short, what's it look like? Lincoln F. Stern 05:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A quick web search turns up some Mad Max souvenir merchandise showing the logo with uncertain copyright status, like this and this – but the logo is entirely fictional, as the article now makes clear. From all indications, there was no known logo for the actual Seven Sisters oil cartel or its official incarnation as the "Consortium for Iran". —Patrug (talk) 07:00, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seven Sisters Logo 

message: What specific cartel behavior did these companies engage in, apart from in their dealings with Iran c. 1951? Did they have regular private meetings? I don't doubt that they acted in parallel, because they had common interests. but "cartel" implies tight coordination. It is certainly possible, even likely, that there was such coordination, but specifics would be nice. DCDuring (talk) 14:49, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartel?
Talk:Andrea Scanavacca

message: according to Italian wiki, he's back in the Rovigo. --Lo'oris (talk) 14:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team 
Template talk:United States telephone companies

message: There are hundreds (thousands?) of telephone companies in the US. I've noticed some rather obscure companies creeping on to this list. I should have probably given this more thought when starting this template, but I'd like to try to come up with some criteria to keep this template manageable. I suggest a minimum of 100,000 access lines for inclusion. This makes little change to the template, except for the exclusion of the recently-added Seaport Capital, and the swapping of Alaska Power and Telephone Company for Alaska Communications Systems, which was my earlier mistake. I've modified the template accordingly and have also changed it to use Template:Navigation
 Access Lines
Company                           	Lines (in millions)    	Source
ACS                               	0.1974                 	
AT&T                              	31.855 (September 2008)	
CenturyLink                       	15.057 (June 2011)     	
Cincinnati Bell                   	0.7117 (March 2010)    	
Deltacom                          	0.375                  	
FairPoint                         	1.454 (September 2010) 	
Frontier                          	5.490 (June 2011)      	
Hawaiian Telcom                   	0.6153                 	
TDS                               	1.1                    	
Verizon                           	35.197 (March 2009)    	
Windstream                        	3.26 (June 2011)       	
Alaska Power and Telephone Company	0.013                  	
Seaport Capital                   	0.0365                 	
Afiler 04:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria 

message: Can VoIP providers be in the list as well? Feel free to remove Vonage from the template. FOPFan300 21:05, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Outside the scope of this template, which is for landline companies. That's why mobile companies aren't included, either. The navbox title should probably be changed to make that clearer. oknazevad (talk) 21:53, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Hey, should [[Vonage]] be here?
Talk:940th Air Refueling Wing

message: I'm removing the "orphan" template ("This article is an orphan, as few or no other articles link to it....") from the article.  Many other articles link to this one.  This includes some articles that link here via the 940th Air Refueling Wing redirect.  When an article is moved, as this one was, such a redirect is created automatically.  It is not necessary to update the articles that now link to the redirect.  It is only necessary to fix any old redirects so that they point to the new article name, to avoid double redirects, which, when clicked, to not bring the reader to the article, but in this case that has already been done, by a bot.  All this is explained -- a bit confusingly, perhaps -- at Help:Moving a page#How to move a page. — Mudwater (Talk) 14:29, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur.--Morenooso (talk) 04:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What links here
Talk:List of USAF Provisional Wings assigned to Strategic Air Command

message: The 1703 may have had B52's on paper, they must have gone with the rest to Diego Garcia because there were never B52's at King Khalid International Airport in 1990 or 1991. 
Which by the way the 1703 is listed as being in "King Khalid, Saudi Arabia". It would be more accurately listed as "King Khalid International Airport, 35 Kilometers North of Riyahd, Saudi Arabia" as there is no specific city name there and there are so many places containing the name King Khalid in Saudi Arabia. B4Ctom1 (talk) 23:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dr. Strange (1978 film)

message: I'm confused on how this is an upcoming film seeing how it is marked as 1978.
: This is NOT an upcoming film. There is a new animated film with the same title (and about the same Marvel comics character) which was released in 2007. This is an article about the 1978 live action film. Rosencomet (talk) 16:28, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Here's a good article that might have info to add -  - Favre1fan93 (talk) 06:06, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to use in article
Talk:Afterlife/to do

message: *Pinpoint areas to work on
*Separate fraudulent experiments and research on this subject from that which is considered legitimate, i.e., that which is accepted as valid by the scientific community. The two categories (exposed fraud and legitimate science) should be listed in different sections under different titles. Lumping fraudulent research together with valid research may give the impression that all legitimate scientists reject the existence of life after death or, even worse, consider the very question absurd. If there is a consensus among scientists that the question of life after death is absurd, then research demonstrating the validity of this assertion should be offered. However, it seems obvious to this writer that no such consensus exists or can exist. 184.100.227.172 (talk) 00:11, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Assistant pastor

message: I noticed that Associate Pastor simply redirects to the Pastor article. Should this page do the same, or does it really warrant its own article? Madnova777 05:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lol that the note that I was about to leave has been a discussion since 2007. I will be merging and redirecting it into the pastor article and adding a section on junior positions perhaps. It's not a standardized/certified title like Certified Nursing Assistants etc., which have more sources to draw from. originalmesstalk 08:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Kermanshah province

message: Among the languages spoken in the province one was Luri. I deleted it and substituted turkish which is spoken by less than half the people In Sonqor county(tens of thousands of people). Laki another dialect spoken in Kermanshah is a mixed subdialect of Kurdish and Luri. Nobody in Kermanshah Province speaks Luri proper.Laki and Kermanshah Kurdish are mutually understandable. So I let it for another wiki editor to delete it. I'm sure it should be deleted.--Rahman Amiri 06:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: laki is spoken in Harsin county but mostly toward Ilam, I suppose. What about Kangawar, what is their dialect? I suggest to change Turkish to Azeri. --Xashaiar (talk) 04:44, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Languages/dialects

message: To add to article: what this province borders. 173.89.236.187 (talk) 23:30, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Butcher paper

message: I removed the section "External Links", which consisted of the item:
* What is The True Difference Between Kraft Paper and Butcher Paper?
The linked article is
# badly written, if you actually expect it to live up to it's title
# intended for paper professionals instead of the general public
# advertises the author's brand of paper as the best
The total relevant content, which might be added in to the article can be summarized as follows:
# butcher's paper is approved for contact with food, kraft paper is usually not
# butcher's paper is usually (but not always) white, kraft paper is usually (but not always) brown
# the process of making the two types of paper starts out similar, then somehow differs
The rest of the article is worthless, and I thoroughly regret having spent my time reading it.
--BjKa (talk) 13:54, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link deleted 

message: I was hoping to learn if this paper has parafin wax or polyurethane 64.66.208.158 (talk) 13:28, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coating
Talk:Diisopropylamine

message: Just checking (my chemistry is rusty): Diisopropylamine is the same as diisopropanolamine, right? --Chriswaterguy talk 05:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, wasn't thinking straight... I guess diisopropanolamine would have -OH groups on the propyl groups, but otherwise be the same as diisopropylamine? --Chriswaterguy talk 05:14, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Also called
 diisopropanolamine? 

message: One of the values given in the table cannot be right. I guess it's the one for the basicity.
If the acidity means the ability of (i-Pr)2NH to donate a proton, then the given value of 40 is plausible because the conjugate base (i-Pr)2N- is a very strong base.
But the basicity pKb - which I understand as the ability of i-Pr2NH to be itself protonated to (i-Pr)2NH2+ - cannot be 54, that value means it is almost impossible to protonate it. Even if 5,4 is meant (lost the comma), this value still appears too high to me, as such amines typically have pKb values of 3-4. --79.243.243.156 (talk) 23:02, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  acidity / basicity
Talk:Crazy

message: * I've been looking at this page's edit history, and it seems that it has been vandalized repeatedly...including just 5 minutes ago. So let's put a lock on it so that vandals won't be able to edit this understandibly tempting subject. Question is, can someone else do it? I really don't know how. Uagehry456 05:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really think the current level of vandalism justifies protection, but you can make a request at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. --Fritz S. (Talk) 11:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mutiara SIS Al-Jufrie Airport

message: 1) The external link to the official website no longer works
2) There is only one physical runway (2067 x 30 meters) that is given two approach names 15/33. This is supported by the link http://worldaerodata.com/wad.cgi?id=ID99821&sch=WAML I am unable to find any match for the current runways description. It is likely there were two runways, but one or both have been removed; there are faint traces seen in the satellite imaging. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Mutiara+Sis+Al+Jufri+Airport/@-0.9228709,119.9095287,1478m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x0:0x7901e4b80676942e!8m2!3d-0.9185584!4d119.9062272 Three d dave (talk) 00:22, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections required
Talk:John Nance Garner House

message: Stub/High Bhaktivinode 12:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Texas
Talk:Fluidization

message: I believe that the first commercial gas-solid fluid bed application was coal gasification (Winkler) in the 1920s, not FCC.  FCC was in the 40s.  You also forgot fluid bed roasting, calcining, drying, incineration, CFB boilers, and a myriad of other commercialized applications.  That CO2 stuff is so far off from being commercial, that it doesn't merit inclusion in an applications section. BSMet94 20:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Success or not, it was the first commericalized application of fluid bed technology.BSMet94 (talk) 21:46, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Application comments

message: The UBC Fluidization Research Centre link is a restricted access website. Any other sources for the information you got there would be much appreciated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Solego (talk • contribs) 04:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resource Links 

message: Editors need to be aware that there are multiple overlapping articles  dealing with fluidization.  While some repetition of material is necessary, it is a shame that editors may be wasting effort expanding into details that are already covered and are the chief focus of other articles.  The list of all related articles and my understanding of the focus of each is as follows:
*focus of this article: The physics phenomena
*focus of Fluidized bed: Overview of all applications of fluidization, including high velocity forms which technically have no beds
*focus of Fluidized bed combustion: combustion applications
*focus of Fluidized bed reactor: applications in chemical engineering processes
J JMesserly (talk) 18:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article overlaps
Talk:Can Masdeu

message: Major Edits: So i took what was there as an article and majorly expanded it based on conversations with folx from Can Masdeu and 
others familiar with the community.  There are almost certainly some mistakes in here.  Brian from CMD has said he will review the article and fix it.  I am enlisting the help of others who know it more intimately than i do.--Paxuscalta (talk) 13:49, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Santa Maria del Mar, Barcelona

message: I'm reverting the edits by Jmgl2005 on 5 March 2008 as superfluous. They add no information to the article. Specifically:
* the parenthetical remark "it was a romanesque-styled church", apart from being badly expressed, is only stating the obvious. Any church built around then in Spain would necessarily have been Romanesque in style;
* all the information in the paragraph about the fire in 1936 is already there elsewhere in the article, except that it was "a few days after the Civil War started". I haven't been able to find a reference to the exact date of the incidents, so I thought it better not to include unsourced information. As for observing that the "church has a lot of visitors, both due to the best selling novel "La Catedral del Mar" and the concerts which take place here", such reasons are pure speculation. Everywhere in central Barcelona is saturated with tourists these days, and anyway concert-goers are not really the same thing as "visitors" (or, indeed, worshippers). AdeMiami (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting edits by Jmgl2005
Talk:Tonquin (1807 ship)

message: I just finished transcribing the account given in John Hopper's Indian Wars in the Pacific Northwest (1996).  It appears to be based on the Akrigg account which I'll add later, but there are differences; spelling and punctuation idiosyncracies and certain small errors in Hopper have been left as-is.  ("Tacoutche Tesse" as the name of the Columbia River was Dakelh, I thought, not Chinookan).Skookum1 21:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for more on the ''Tonquin''

message: Sources vary on the background of the ships hired interpreter, with most being based off of Irving Washington's Astoria that states he was of Chinookan and British ancestry. An article I recently read, appropriately titled "The Identity of the Tonquin's Interpreter" found in the Oregon Historical Quarterly volume 98, makes a convincing case using the journal of Fort Astorias that the man was from the Quinalt nation (he is directly refereed to be from that cultural group in the source materials). I've updated the article to reflect this. Voltaire's Vaquero (talk) 06:12, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: i saw bad grammar above in main but I bet  wiki  zealots will delete this entry  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.38.155.134 (talk) 12:59, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpreter of Tonquin
Talk:University of Rovira i Virgili

message: Nearly the entire article had been copied from the school website, an apparent copyright violation, promotional in tone, and possible conflict of interest. Wikipedia articles are not intended as promotional vehicles, or as duplicates of an institution's website. JNW (talk) 07:17, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding the copyright, we received OTRS permission:
- Jcb (talk) 11:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good, but given the promotional tone of earlier versions, text taken from the website will need to be copyedited to meet encyclopedic guidelines. JNW (talk) 11:25, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverting to earlier version

message: I would have copy-edited this, but aside from the governmental award, which presumably circulates among the colleges ofits section of Catalonia, I have no idea what this actually means behind the jargon:
:It was selected as the Southern Catalonia Campus of International Excellence (CEICS)Southern Catalonia Campus of International Excellence (CEICS)  by the Ministry of Education in 2010, which consolidated the strategic aggregation of the various institutions and structures for teaching, research, knowledge transfer and the productive sector of southern Catalonia with the aim of becoming an international reference in the fields of Chemistry and Energy, Nutrition and Health, Tourism, Oenology, and Heritage and Culture.
Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What does this mean?
Talk:SS Columbia (1902 steamboat)

message: Comment from what I can see these should be merged; bear in mind that there's other vessels named Columbia, namely a Hudson's Bay Company coastal vessel in the PacNW (not sure if SS or MV or RMS designation...if it had one) and Columbia (sternwheeler)/Columbia (steam tug) on the Arrow Lakes and adjoining Columbia River; both were steam vessels so Columbia (steamer) is a bit too broad of a brush; there's quite likely other vessels named Columbia yet to turn up, too.....Skookum1 (talk) 16:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: merge proposal
Talk:Massimo Dutti

message: Does anyone else find "As Inditex higher-end brand, it is more associated to a masstige market." without any citation to be nothing but a slightly snobby comment? Based on what is this associated with a "mastige" market, because it is owned by the same company as Zara? That's the reasoning?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:659:1300:600B:9F19:8E85:DC25 (talk) 07:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Unnecessarily subjective language?
Talk:Enric Bernat

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure)  SilverLocust (talk) 02:17, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: pages with content, such as :Enric Bernat, are ineligible to be proposed titles in move requests unless they, too, are formally dispositioned. ":Enric Bernat → Deleted to make way for page move" was added to this request to meet that requirement. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 22:29, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 27 June 2023 

message: Just FYI, the dab page was speedied twice, then reinstated to Enric Bernat (disambiguation) with a  tag. P.I. Ellsworth , ed. put'er there 09:38, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Post move
Talk:Luca Signorelli

message: It seems to me that a link to Last Judgement would be quite appropriate here, to possibly enlighten readers on the subject of a key work by this artist. DES (talk) 21:56, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 

message: The Italian wikipedia page on the image dates it at 1475, not 1480.  Which is correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.205.145.82 (talk) 14:15, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Brera Flagellation 

message: It would be better to put his alternative names into the opening section, making it easier for people searching for those names to ascertain that it is the same person. The entirety of the article features only a single citation, despite many specific facts that are cited. This means that it’s hard to know which information comes from which source. The article should be citing where it gets each piece of unique information. Additionally, almost half of the sources are by the same author, Sara Nair James. The article features text taken from an Encyclopedia Britannica article, which takes away from its originality and while legal, is somewhat close to plagiarism- the article doesn’t specify which parts of it are adapted from this source, which is troubling. Most of the article is factual in nature, with few chunks that take on much subjectivity. It is relevant to Luca Signorelli throughout, providing important information about his life and his work. The see also section could use some expansion, though the major works list is well crafted. While one source dates back to 1899, most of the information included is not things that have likely changed since then. Mhighland11 (talk) 15:55, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matt Highland Critique
Talk:Castilian-Leonese cuisine

message: Please see it. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Leonese cuisine ]] 

message: The "cecina" picture is of very bad quality and gives no information on the dish.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.64.77.138 (talk) 09:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/TimVickers

message: Category:	2
Image:	87
Mainspace	4391
Portal talk:	4
Portal:	4
Talk:	676
Template:	7
User talk:	1002
User:	66
Wikipedia talk:	50
Wikipedia:	784
avg edits per article	5.70
earliest	21:02, 17 June 2006
number of unique articles	1241
total	7073
2006/6 	242 	
2006/7 	470 	
2006/8 	353 	
2006/9 	1301 	
2006/10 	1146 	
2006/11 	995 	
2006/12 	1168 	
2007/1 	1101 	
2007/2 	297 	
Edit count with User:Interiot's wannabe-Kate tool. Opabinia regalis 06:19, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count