Talk:José A. Cabranes

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:11, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: To those who are adding the section: "Notorious Cases" - "United States V. Marco Fidel Castellar".
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a public forum in which our personal opinions about a "case" are to be discussed. It is required that all additions are welcomed as long as a "reliable verifiable" source is provided and cited. Those are the established rules in Wikipedia. It doesn't matter if the information in the person's Bio is negative or positive, or if the person adding the information has a personal agenda against the subject in question, as long as there is a reliable verifiable source that can proof the person's allegations. Those editing Wikipedia "must" follow the rules, otherwise their insistence of adding material without any evidence to back them up may be deemed as POV or vandalism and the person may be blocked from editing. I agree that both the good and the bad should be added to an article, however my concern here is that our rules be followed. Tony the Marine (talk) 19:32, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Jose Alberto Cabranes was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 17:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on José A. Cabranes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140407082520/http://www.ali.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=projects.members&projectid=28 to http://www.ali.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=projects.members&projectid=28
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on José A. Cabranes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222181115/http://www.ali.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=projects.members&projectid=3 to http://www.ali.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=projects.members&projectid=3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It seems that both  and I have the same concern over recent edits of  on categorizing Judge Cabranes' education category. Based on my research, there is a preponderance of evidence, including a New York Times article (https://www.nytimes.com/1979/12/21/archives/a-puerto-rican-for-the-federal-court-jose-alberto-cabranes.html), an official biography on his federal judge page (https://coop.ca2.uscourts.gov/judges/bios/jac.html), and numerous alumni magazine articles and profiles, including his keynote address in one of Columbia's events (http://www.columbia.edu/cu/record/archives/vol20/vol20_iss25/record2025.14.html), showing that he graduated from Columbia College, the undergraduate liberal arts college of Columbia University. To Snickers 2686: You insisted in a number of edit reversals that these evidence are "incorrect" and argued under my comment on your talk page that the biographies of the Federal Judicial Center should take precedence. However I cannot find Wikipedia policy that substantiates your claim and I am unsure if this is a consensus established by Wikipedia editors. Since you have not responded to my comments and my questions, it would be nice if you can provide some justification as to why they should be categorized as Columbia University alumni and not Columbia College (New York) alumni. CatchedY (talk) 10:42, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Columbia College vs. Columbia University