lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Atrophic gastritis

message: It would be informative to explain the significance of "atropic" in the term. Unfree (talk) 17:11, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It did.  Atrophic means to degrade or wither away, and the article states that the stomach tissue is turned into fibrous intestinal tissue.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darktangent (talk • contribs) 01:26, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Why "atrophic"?
Talk:B-cell lymphoma

message: "Indolent lymphomas respond rapidly to treatment and are kept under control (in remission) with long-term survival of many years, but are not cured. Aggressive lymphomas usually require intensive treatments, but have good prospects for a permanent cure."
:This isn't really true. Some indolent tumours respond poorly to chemotherapy (as most chemotherapy relies on cell division). Conversely, some high grade lymphomas do indeed respond with intensive treatment with a good chance of remission (e.g Burkitt lymphoma, but there are numerous high grade lymphomas with poor prognosis (DLBCL, anaplastic, etc). Mark ong (talk) 20:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

message: Hi,  could you explain me why have you delete the guidelines? My edits are part of GLAM project and all the suggestions are from MD doctors. Thank you so much!! :) --Federica Viazzi (AO AL) (talk) 14:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it is not clear why this particular guideline should be promoted as the only authoritative guideline without any discussion of other guidelines and without citing any secondary sources. In addition, this particular guideline is manifestly out of place in this article, which is about any B-cell lymphoma, while the guideline is for the treatment of a specific subtype of it (DLBCL). Ruslik_Zero 20:22, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Ok, thanks  I will search further information. --Federica Viazzi (AO AL) (talk) 10:30, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  deleting guidelines
Talk:Balkan endemic nephropathy

message: Suggest this page should become a sub-section of a top level topic "aristolochic acid nephropathy" which would also contain subject "chinese herbs nephopathy". Joncolvin (talk) 03:19, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: I'm going to move this page from Danubian endemic familial nephropathy to Balkan endemic nephropathy, since that second title seems to be vastly more common in recent reliable source. For example, a Google Scholar search over the last 15 years returns just 19 results for the first term and 2 800 for the second.—Neil P. Quinn (talk) 06:47, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move
Talk:Exophthalmic goiter

message: This article could be redirected to Graves' disease?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.4.176.41 (talk) 21:46, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. It has some history and alternatve names which need to be preserved, is all. The Graves article also needs to note all the alternate names, but they don't need linking in the Graves article (since any links would just direct back to the aticle with the links). However, I think all the alternate names should be linked and re-directed to Graves' disease. SBHarris 23:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: REDIRECT DONE. SBHarris 23:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect ?
Talk:Clan Macdonald of Sleat

message: I think the article should follow the style used on the Standing Council of Scottish Chiefs website . So, that would mean using the form Clan Macdonald of Sleat instead of the current Clan MacDonald of Sleat. Also, see the Burkes Peerage website to see how the chief is styled  "25th Chief of Macdonald of Sleat".--Celtus (talk) 10:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. My grandfather was the chairman of the first executive committee of the Clan Donald Lands Trust (and a prominent member of the clan) and he always styled himself Macdonald. Looking at some of the literature that does seem the proper way to refer to it. Francis Davey (talk) 17:18, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, i moved it. If anyone has a problem with it they can let people know by writing something here.--Celtus (talk) 05:33, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article to [[Clan Macdonald of Sleat]] 

message: There's something fishy about the Gaelic pedigree. It's given as Shir Iain Gorraidh mac Alasdair Somhairle mhic Gorraidh 'ic Alasdair Uilleam 'ic Gorraidh 'ic Alasdair Uilleam 'ic Gorraidh 'ic Alasdair 'ic Alasdair 'ic Seumais 'ic Dòmhnaill Breac 'ic Seumais Mhor 'ic Dòmhnaill Gorm Òg 'ic GillEasbaig Clèirich 'ic Dòmhnaill 'ic Dòmhnaill Gorm 'ic Dòmhnaill Gruamach 'ic Dòmhnaill Gallach 'ic Ùisdean 'ic Alasdair 'ic Dòmhnaill 'ic Eoin 'ic Aonghais Òg 'ic Aonghais Mhòr 'ic Dòmhnaill 'ic Raghnaill 'ic Somhairle.
But in Gaelic almost all are missing the expected case marking on the names, it should be:
Shir Iain Gorraidh mac Alasdair Somhairle mhic Gorraidh 'ic Alasdair Uilleam 'ic Gorraidh 'ic Alasdair Uilleam 'ic Gorraidh 'ic Alasdair 'ic Alasdair 'ic Sheumais 'ic Dhòmhnaill Bhric 'ic Sheumais Mhòir 'ic Dhòmhnaill Ghuirm Òig 'ic GillEasbaig Chlèirich 'ic Dhòmhnaill 'ic Dhòmhnaill Ghuirm 'ic Dhòmhnaill Ghruamaich 'ic Dhòmhnaill Ghallaich 'ic Ùisdein 'ic Alasdair 'ic Dòmhnaill 'ic Eoin 'ic Aonghais Òig 'ic Aonghais Mhòir 'ic Dhòmhnaill 'ic Raghnaill 'ic Shomhairle.
Does anyone one know why this entire chain appears to be wrong? Akerbeltz (talk) 10:58, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pedigree
Talk:Baltic area runestones

message: would it be appropriate to designate a primary page for runestones that are on multiple pages, such as U 439 which is one of the Ingvar runestones, so that listed data does not conflict? Deanlaw (talk) 20:10, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Runestones on multiple pages

message: Looks bad to me to call the page "Baltic *area* runestones", the stones are not found in the baltic area but commemorates people going on expeditions into that area, should be named expedition instead in my taste. --81.229.102.134 (talk) 17:14, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nameing 
Talk:Biotin deficiency

message: This article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad (talk) 23:07, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article categorization 

message: What is here is a mess. The numbered refs (1-16) are incomplete. After those there is a long list, not numbered, alphabetical, and in all likelihood copied from another source. Some of these are duplicates of the initial 1-16.David notMD (talk) 15:53, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  References a mess 

message: I have gone through the article and added references. Can the "possible references" section at the bottom of the page hence be deleted now? Or should it be left there anyway? BennBluee (talk) 02:43, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible References Section 

message: There is no source supporting the assertion that consuming raw egg whites can lead to a biotin deficiency. If it is true that avidin binds to biotin and raw egg whites contain a great amount of avidin, then it could be logical to think that consuming raw egg whites could lead to a deficiency in biotin. However, there is no evidence cited in this article to support that assertion. Without specific evidence, this is not an appropriate point to make in this article. It detracts from the nature of biotin deficiency as a rare genetic disease. PalaceofthePopes (talk) 22:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egg whites leading to biotin deficiency
Talk:Blackwater fever

message: This article is written in medical jargon and is largely incomprehensible to the layperson - and is therefore mostly useless.  Stop showing off that you know all the correct terms, and show off that you understand what they actually mean by explaining them. 92.236.53.45 (talk) 14:32, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The term 'black water' arose because that is the name given to effluent pumped out of a ship's heads (toilets), i.e., raw sewage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.7.147.13 (talk) 14:22, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: In English please

message: In "A Message from Charity", one of the episodes of the "new" series of "Twilight Zone", a 20th century male victim of the disease manages to "telepathically" contact a much earlier (17th or thereabouts century) female victim who lived in the same area, and they have a sort of "cross-temporal" romance with much drama. The delirium aspect of the disease is very important to the plot of the story. In my POV, this was a very good episode.
Old_Wombat (talk) 07:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another cultural reference
Template talk:Warren Ellis

message: Do we really need it? It shoves everything over creating a large column of whitespace which could be better used in making the height of the template smaller. (Emperor (talk) 00:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I take your point but the unillustrated version with its redlinks and black dots everywhere is not easy on eye. I'm not pushed either way Skomorokh 00:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see adding the picture helps though. The template does need work - it could do with the colouring put back in which certainly makes it easier to read and takes the eye off the redlinks , that said I'd not object to removing the redlinks (as is done with a number on there now) - they should be linked in from his bibliography and if anyone feels strongly about it then they can start the entry and link it in ;) (Emperor (talk) 00:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Haha, anyone in mind? I removed the redlinks and the image as a compromise. Skomorokh 00:55, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture?
Talk:Bone disease

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Wrong venue: nothing that can be technically done. Sending to AfD or redirecting to a more appropriate article is a separate editorial decision.  No such user (talk) 06:40, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Bone disease →  – This page is merely a list of bone diseases, which I think fits better as a category on its own, possibly as subcategory under Musculoskeletal disorders. Thoughts? 𐩘 Datapass talk 	⌇ contribs 13:21, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

text: If this were AfD, I would probably agree with deletion, not because the topic isn't notable, but because the current content has virtually no value (i.e. WP:TNT).  is the sort of content that would be appropriate for an article at this name. Until someone wants to create a more detailed standalone article, I would suggest making bone disease a redirect to that section. Colin M (talk) 16:17, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 June 2021
Talk:Brachial plexus lesion

message: Brachial plexus injuries are, in essence, traumatic lesions of the plexus. x.qz (talk) 17:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: In answer to Joscon, I'm not aware of any specific time-frame other than the act of being reasonable. So if there is much discussion to be had, this should be allowed. If on the other hand, there appears not to be a demand for discussion, and/or if the opportunity presents itself to do a merge before moving on to further article improvements, I would think the idea would be to proceed forthwith.
I have now updated both this Brachial plexus lesion article, and the Brachial plexus injury article so that they are identical apart from the article name. This should make it easy to merge. The only question will be which article is merged into which. I would suggest that the answer to that is whichever term is used most commonly. I have the impression from this exercise that perhaps the term 'injury' is used more commonly than 'lesion'. I note too that the ICD system uses the term injury. Obviously, the article can still be improved upon. However, it may be prudent to do a merge sooner rather than later, while the text in both is identical.Wotnow (talk) 10:44, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles now essentially identical, and ready for merge
Talk:Branchial cleft cyst

message: This condition can affect string players where the friction aggravates the cyst - I once knew a violist who had to give up playing after incomplete surgery. It doesn't seem to be common, though! Vince Calegon (talk) 15:26, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  violin/viola
Template talk:Dallas Cowboys

message: That color scheme appears and is much more visually pleasing when it's navyblue on gray, not the other way around. El Greco(talk) 14:36, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: User:134.219.174.218 please stop! El Greco(talk) 17:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I think it might be necessary you read: WP:OWN. El Greco(talk) 19:16, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

text: There is no need to follow every other template exactly. That's my point, which is why the Dallas template looks better blue on gray, not the other way around. Oh, and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid arguement. El Greco(talk) 14:11, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

text: So, are you going to even bother to talk about it or incite, the I made this template arguement all over again? We both want to help expand Dallas Cowboys related article, so why are you being so difficult? El Greco(talk) 18:43, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Have you contributed anything other than just reverting this template? El Greco(talk) 16:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

text: PLEASE READ WP:OWN and WP:OR. Your edits and you unwillingness to reach a consensus are not a good thing to be a member here on Wikipedia. I suggest you thoroughly read those two Wikipedia policies because it seems you are breaching them. AND FIX YOUR SIGNATURE!!!!! You're missing a sub in it. El Greco(talk) 17:40, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Where is you consensus???? Please read WP:OWN and please be civil. I'm not writing in capitals because you have an eye sight problem, I'm writing in capitals so that you can pay some attention, which you mostly seem not to be. El Greco(talk) 01:03, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Color scheme

message: Why is that listed on the template?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.67.131.152 (talk) 18:50, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  4-3 Defense?
Talk:Brown's syndrome

message: This article seems quite poorly written in general. Poor wording and grammar is immediately evident and I suspect some of the facts will need verifying and referencing? I will try to re-write parts of it in the coming weeks, but if anybody has a special interest in this topic please feel free to collaborate.
DW1979 (talk) 12:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete Edit/Re-write required? 

message: Seriously - where are they? There are a lot statistics given, and they need verifying and sourcing. This article is still a mess, although I have made some attempt at cleaning it up. If anyone else has the motivation to do more, that would be great! Tinkstar1985 21:25, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Bursectomy

message: in https://gelenk-klinik.de/gelenke/bursitis-schleimbeutelentzuendung.html#fuss you read that a bursa after removal regenerates quickly. true? and for all bursae? can this be described in the article or a dedicated one? thanx! HilmarHansWerner (talk) 10:23, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: regeneration of bursa?
Talk:Moon pool

message: This article badly needs either clarification or a summary of what a Moon Pool actually is. I came here from another page to find out what a moon pool is and what its purpose is, and I still have the same questions after skimming the article...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.174.98.10 (talk) 20:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary? 

message: do Submarines (eg Personal submarines) exist with a moon pool ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.246.147.210 (talk) 15:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps this picture may be added ?
thumb|right|150px
81.245.180.184 (talk) 11:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Subs

message: Can anyone tell me the origins of the name Moon Pool?
Why is it called a Moon Pool, why not a Bottomless Pool?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.32.255.195 (talk) 10:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be named for the A. Merritt novel to which there is a link at the top of the main article. In fact, I came here out of curiosity to see if anyone had cited any evidence to that effect, but didn't find any such mention either here or in the novel's article. —Robotech_Master (talk) 05:07, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Origins 

message: I think the article would really benefit from a picture of one of these from the inside. I seem to recall some fictional TV programme having one, maybe SeaQuest DSV, but I don't know if what I remember was a fair representation. Does the water level slosh up and down with the movement of waves or the ship? Any information about what they're like would be appreciated. Beorhtwulf (talk) 21:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request

message: I feel that the article could benefit from the addition of a section discussing the origin of the name "moon pool". 142.183.79.180 (talk) 20:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could someone add an etymology
Talk:Saussurea obvallata

message: Vivek (talk) 22:32, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the gallery photo, a correct photo of Saussurea obvallata is shown under external links. Melburnian (talk) 01:08, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

message: I see that a properly-sourced edit stating that it's the state flower of Uttarakhand was deleted as promotional. That seems excessive to me.  If it were the state flower of other places, it seems like it would be perfectly reasonable to list them as well.  But if it's been recognized as emblematic by someone, that seems Wikipedia-worthy to me. I'm going to reinstate that line pending any more debate here. Bill Woodcock (talk) 10:33, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  State flower
Talk:HMS Ruby (1652)

message: Wouldn't 40 guns place her in the Fifth rate frigate category? TaintedMustard (talk) 22:59, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, only by later standards. The first frigates built for the navy between the mid and late 1640s carried between 32 and 38 guns and were classified as fourth rates. The frigates constructed from the early 1650s were divided into two rough groups, third rates that carried between 48 and 52 guns, and fourth rates that carried between 38 and 46 guns. Most of the fourth rates were around 40 and 44 guns. Only in the later part of the seventeenth century does the rating system come to resemble that of the later period of naval warfare. Benea (talk) 03:29, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah. Thanks for clearing that up for me. Perhaps that should be part of the Fourth-rate article? The wording in this article is confusing, initially using "Fourth rate" as a classification of frigate and then as a term for a ship of the line, without explaining the change in terminology in between. TaintedMustard (talk) 08:35, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Cardiomegaly

message: It's not clear to me whether this is meant to be an actual article, or a list of related conditions.  I have assumed that someone plans to write an actual article here.  If not, please change the "class" setting in the WPMED tag to read "List" instead.  Thanks, WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope 

message: What about ASD and PFO?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.209.250.142 (talk) 20:46, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing causes 

message: Removed hypothyroidism from the near-bottom of the list, as it was on the list twice. ProfMontgomery (talk) 01:53, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed 2nd Hypothyroidism 

message: Why is this this article not named "Enlarged heart"? Based on Google and Google news searches, "Enlarged heart" dominates over--what is it again?--"Cardiomegaly"? If you think current title is correct, please explain within the context of WP policy WP:COMMONNAME. Thanks. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 03:37, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this this article not named "Enlarged heart"?
Talk:Carditis

message: in 2000, am j surg path 24 (3): 344-354, 2000 
Am J surg path 24 (3) 402 - 409, 2000
symptomatic refulxers who had no signs of histologic change in their esophogus has signs of carditis.  is this carditis of the gastric cardia???
If so, then this should be added. Tkjazzer (talk) 21:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't looked up the articles because I don't have access here, but maybe someone else does. Tkjazzer (talk) 21:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  what is the carditis when talking about GERD
Talk:Catel–Manzke syndrome

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI!  01:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Highlands and Islands Enterprise

message: Mais Oui has proposed merging Highlands and Islands Development Board into this article. Before going ahead with this I would like to know more about the change.  Was it just a renaming or was there a change in philosophy or policy?  If the continuity was very strong, a single article would deal with it best, but if the HIDB really was a distinct historical phase, it should have its own article.  (Mind you, the HIDB article is only worth keeping if it is going to grow!)  --Doric Loon (talk) 08:05, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it was mostly a renaming, although the Enterprise group took over parts of Strathspey that the old one didn't have. --MacRusgail (talk) 13:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's also the Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) entry to consider Stumpfoot (talk) 05:38, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal