lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Giant Claw

message: I've toned down the claims regarding "La Carcagne" being an actual monster from French-Canadian folklore made in the article; that's what the movie claims, not something verified by outside sources on French-Canadian folklore. I trust we're not going to use a Hollywood B-movie as a credible source on what's actually in Fr-Canadian folklore. I've read several books on French-Canadian folklore (including the works of ethnologist JC Dupont, who has made the collection of French-Canadian and French-American myths his life work), and I have yet to encounter anything named La Carcagne, or indeed anything about a banshee-like flying monster. Or any sort of named flying monster.--Guillaume Hébert-Jodoin (talk) 18:31, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: La Carcagne

message: Includes snips from better special effects movies, including Harryhausen's Earth v the Flying Saucers (collapse of Washington Monument) and Pal's War of the Worlds (explosion of Los Angeles City Hall building) representing buildings in NYC.  However, that is so typical of 1950s B movies, I wonder if it deserves mention in the article. Naaman Brown (talk) 12:19, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stock Footage 

message: I can't verify this. I've just watched the movie and did not catch anything like that in the dialogue. I'm removing the following words until such a time as they can be substantiated: "(and then later from the year 17,000,000 B.C.)". If I've somehow missed these words, please tell us at what point they occur in the movie. Metamagician3000 (talk) 12:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 17,000,000 BC reference

message: Most of this article excluding the plot, is written in a style that reflects more personal opinion than the required encyclopedic tone, also the whole article is poorly written and developed and should be rewritten entirely and expanded.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:09, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not agree at all, and neither do other editors who have worked on the article. FWiW  Bzuk (talk) 01:27, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: My Saturday night Creature Features recollection is that characters make mention of "mu mesons" or "mu mesonic" matter. The former was an early designation for the muon itself (a taxonomic error; muons are leptons and fermionic; mesons are hadrons and are bosonic) and the latter refers to matter that has one or more muons in place of electrons. While muons have corresponding anti-particles, neither muons nor mu mesic atoms are antimatter.  Rt3368 (talk) 06:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Particle physics 

message: The idea that Rodan influenced The Giant Claw deserves greater scrutiny. Rodan was released in Japan on December 26, 1956, while production on The Giant Claw began on February 1, 1957. That's an incredibly short window of time for Sam Katzman to find out about a monster movie released halfway around the world and decide to make his own version. 
I am also not aware of any primary source that cites Rodan as an influence on Claw.--AstoundingBB (talk) 11:01, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Rodan'' influence
Talk:Carl H. J. Schenck

message: ...But, this still may be an AfD, as there is very, very little published on this guy, and notability seem to be an issue. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 00:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple issues have been addressed
Talk:Cork hat

message: To avoid confusion, please note that the hat depicted above is not a cork hat, but a mortarboard. V-Man737 10:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Important note

message: I think the picture is inappropriate. It doesn't really show the cork hat well, and the other things are just not relevant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.20.183.211 (talk) 23:18, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree — the other objects are distracting and also feels like stereotyping. It's better than having no picture, though. — Unbitwise (talk) 18:34, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: The Main article states "Pieces of cork, often shaped as bottle stoppers, are hung on string from the brim of the hat."
I'm inclined to believe the pieces of cork *are* (or at least *were*) bottle stoppers, originally obtained from liquor bottles. Many liquor bottles used to have cork stoppers and their re-use on hats would be an early form of re-cycling, at no extra cost to the bushies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.9.151.254 (talk) 01:13, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. HiLo48 (talk) 02:21, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of the cork pieces 

message: :File:An Aussie bloke wearing a cork hat.jpg
An anon keeps reinserting this image which I removed some time ago. It does not seem to me to depict the classic picture - in fact witht he tickness of the strings, the size of the corks and the logo, it looks like this is tourist tat. Especially given the stuffed toy and the toy didgeridoo. I would be surprised if this was actually an Aussie at all. Guy (Help!) 08:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: I want to edit this page for a university assignment. By the end of the semester I will have added 2000 words to this piece. Am I allowed to have access? Also I am confused as why this is protected isn't it a stub? Jenaemadden (talk) 05:10, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: requests for decreases to the page protection level should be directed to the protecting admin or to Wikipedia:Requests for page protection if the protecting admin is not active or has declined the request. 
The Admin who last protected this article is  (who I just pinged) - FlightTime (open channel) 05:23, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 March 2020 

message: Before the tassled corks, the cork hat was synonymous with topee, e.g. from Dutch Authors on Asian History ... there is 
The Bengal topee ( what we call a cork hat ) is to be found in an advertisement from 1850.
 Lmstearn (talk) 04:29, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cork Hat in History
Talk:Julia Turner (murderer)

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 13:18, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: I am planning to create a category of female murderers, and this article seems notable for that future purpose. As I haven't created the category as of this minute, I left the orphaned tag. Anynobody 08:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed notability tag
Talk:Batts Combe quarry

message: I was told today that Batts Combe closed on Friday March 13th. I cannot find any references so haven't updated the article. Anyone else heard about this? --TimTay (talk) 20:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like I was right, just out by a couple of weeks. The lime kiln closed last week (added to article). Decision expected on fully quarry closure next week. --TimTay (talk) 12:01, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closure
Talk:Moderate Youth League

message: I just did copyediting and cleanup at Moderate Students, but I'm not convinced it should continue to be a standalone article given all the issues it still has tagged and due to the dearth of coverage in reliable English-language sources (only 1740 Google hits for "moderate students" sweden -wikipedia). Take away the listings of board members and chapters from that article, and you just have a few sentences that would snugly fit into the Moderate Students section of this article. --BDD (talk) 05:07, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this motion. Merging it would do just fine. Pepparkaksgubbe (talk) 14:54, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Cox's Cave

message: The description of the discovery contradicts http://www.showcaves.com/english/gb/showcaves/CheddarOldham.html which says "Named after Mr George Cox, this cave was discovered during a quarrying operation in 1837. Having put his pick through a small hole Mr Cox enlarged it, and entered the cave, which he subsequently opened to the public."
Reference 1 is not currently  available but can be found at http://web.archive.org/web/20070815124559/http://www.cheddarcaves.co.uk/coxs.htm
Derek Andrews (talk) 20:52, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure I see the contradiction. Reference 1 states: "Accidentally discovered by mill-owner George Cox in 1837 when one of his workmen fell through a hole in the roof  while collecting rocks for a new building.". That is essentially the same thing, just slightly different detail. I'd be tempted to take Ref 1 (from Cheddar Caves - owner/operator of Cox's cave) as the definitive version. It is also backed up by this book, which I will add as a reference. For this reason I am going to remove the contradiction notice. If you disagree please do reintroduce it and let's discuss. --SpunkyBob (talk) 19:00, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction
Talk:Goatchurch Cavern

message: I just reverted an edit which changed the cave length from 750m to 1500m. As someone who used to frequent Goatchurch and the other Mendip caves in my youth, I'm certain it is not 1500m long. Its length is referred to in two different Internet articles as being 750m  and one as less than 1000m . For this reason I stand by my reversion. --Cheesy Mike 08:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that is the length we have a variety of sources for, but there is always further exploration & it would be useful if anyone who knows about recent exploration/discoveries would post here, with a source for the info.— Rod talk 08:49, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cave length
Talk:St Cuthbert's Swallet

message: I know there are bigger things to worry about on the planet, but should St Cuthberts Swallett be St Cuthbert's Swallett i.e. with an apostrophe? Various pages on the Internet, including the references cited in the article, list it with an apostrophe. The same is true on the OS Map. --Cheesy Mike 08:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm always being accused of apostrophe abuse - but I think the English Nature citation sheet (referenced on the article) should be seen as the authoritative source & that includes the apostrophe - but I'm not going to loose sleep over it.— Rod talk 08:44, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. Fixed it. Moved the page and traced/fixed most (all?) of the links to the article. --Cheesy Mike 11:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Apostrophe
Talk:Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah

message: * You spell it in the article as being Ahlus Sunnah wal Jamaah or Ahl ul-Sunnah Wa al-Jamma. The organisation itself spell it as: Ahl Us-Sunnah Wal-Jama'ahhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iJVvUALGcyQhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6IpwYEBw5_Mhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wwxmm1h-go
* Also, what is the exact translation? Does it mean Adherents to the Sunnah and the community
* Or does it mean Followers of the Sunnah and the Community
* Or does it mean Eyes and Ears of Muslims
* Or does it mean The People of the Sunnah (Way of Prophet) and the Jama'ah (Community)
* I think it means 'The Ahlus (People/Followers) of the Sunnah (Way of Prophet) Wal (and the) Jama'ah (Community/Muslims/Congregation/Society)''''
* An article on the meaning of it: The Meaning of Ahl us-Sunnah wal Jamaa'at.
* Their is also The Creed of Ahl-us-Sunnah wal-Jama'ah concerning the Sahabah by Shaykh 'Abdul-Muhsin bin Hamad Al'Abbad.
*Their is also another version here called The Creed of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaa'ah concerning the Companions by Shaykh 'Abdul-Muhsin bin Hamad Al'Abbad. 
*Also Ahlus -Sunnah Wal Jama'ah: The People of the Sunnah and the Jama'ah by Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammad
'''
Robert C Prenic (talk) 19:36, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct spelling and translation?

message: I suggest that this article me merged into the Sunni Islam article, for two reasons.  First and foremost, because it is essentially the same term but "Sunni" is more commonly used by English speakers (since this is English-language Wikipedia).
The second is the POV laden in this article.  It is, essentially, a polemically charged issue as various groups claim to be the ones "truly" following the Sunnah.  Example, this article makes the claim that the Ash'aris and Maturidis are the two traditional schools of Aqidah, completely ignoring other groups within Sunni Islam such as the Atharis/Salafis.  The article also openly claims that Ahl-e-Hadith and Salafis differ from Ahlus Sunnah in regard to fiqh madhhabs, and this is clearly opinion and not fact; as both of the above groups claim that they are Ahlus Sunnah while those who make taqlid of madhhabs aren't.  This is just an example of the lack of neutrality here which unfortunately permeates most of the article.  Most of it is opinion presented as fact.
Also as an aside, most of this article doesn't appear to be sourced.  Given it's POV nature, I doubt any sources conforming to WP:RS, WP:NPOV, and/or WP:V could be found.  With that in mind, I recommend a merge of non-POV and non-redundant content into Sunni Islam and redirect this article there. MezzoMezzo (talk) 06:20, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into Sunni Islam
Talk:Dawn (newspaper)

message: How is this the "largest" and most widely read newspaper if the circulation listed is less than that of The News?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.85.29.8 (talk) 20:58, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

message: The second paragraph of the opening description is duplicated somewhat by the first of 'Early History', with (albeit similar) perspectives as to Jinnah's aims in establishing the Newspaper.  Jinnah's aims could perhaps be stated in just one place.  I do quite like the quote though!
Blueincubus (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and cut the first sentence from the "Early History" section and combined it with the second paragraph of the opening description. It reads much cleaner this way and does contain any redundancies. Good find! Meatsgains (talk) 04:55, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication

message: http://m.dawn.com/
WhisperToMe (talk) 03:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: It is not a newspaper of record as it’s circulation is less than that of other dailies (english and urdu). The article is fluffed up with factual deviations to make it seem like the newspaper is a big deal. Its owner is subject to large sexual abuse scandals as well. All my edits were backed up with facts and sources 202.47.37.163 (talk) 19:41, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  biased article 

message: The lead needs to state when Dawn stopped being a Muslim League mouthpiece. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 07:47, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muslim League mouthpiece
Talk:Hansel and Gretel: An Opera Fantasy

message: I don't understand. Why did everyone have to wait until 1954 for the next American non-Disney animated film, Hansel and Gretel: An Opera Fantasy to come out? Was it because the other studios were too busy producing more live-action films and slapstick cartoons in the early 50s, was it because RKO's contract with Walt Disney had expired, was it because the other studios felt that they needed to take a break from producing more live-action films and slapstick cartoons and releasing and distributing foreign animated films internationally (i.e. The Magic Horse, which was subtitled in English in 1949, The Emperor's Nightingale, which was dubbed in English in 1951, and Johnny the Giant Killer, which was supposedly dubbed in English in 1953), or was it because animation fans had had enough of every single American animated film being produced by Disney? --Ktommy (talk) 16:07, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Hansel and Gretel: An Opera Fantasy Being the First American Non-Disney Animated Film in 12 Years 

message: View Video, the DVD distributor, lists numerous awards for this film on their website and on the DVD package. http://www.view.com/viewawards.aspx: 
However, only one, from the Dove Foundation, could be independently cited.  When searching the databases of the other awards listed, Hansel & Gretel was notably absent.  Therefore, I have moved the others awards from the article Main page to the Talk page.
*New England Film & Video Festival - Finalist
*A NAIRD Award Finalist
*Film Advisory Board Award of Excellence
*Coilition for Quality Children's Video: Kids First! Endorsement
HedgeHogPower (talk) 18:13, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards
Talk:German torpedo boats of World War II

message: All sources I've seen, cite this class as torpedo boats - not destroyers (). Moreover, the classification "Flottentorpedoboot" has been used for vessels built 1939 and later, which had different capabilities. I think the article's name and content needs to be changed to reflect this. I will do so, unless there's dissent Folks at 137 09:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the name and content change. These are torpedoboats, not destroyers. It would also be nice if you changed the Mowe name to the correct Möwe. Möwe is German for seagull, Mowe doesn't mean anything. Manxruler 11:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Destroyers or torpedoboats?

message: Not done; no support, no rationale; ?Hit-and-run tagging. Archived. Xyl 54 (talk) 01:49, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I guess the Intro has to set the disambiguation caused by the different classifications. --WerWil (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Intro

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:47, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I can see the value of an article offering an overview of a subject, but it is more usual to have separate articles for discrete classes of ships. So if there are no objections I intend to break out the information on the 23- and 24-type vessels to their own articles, and merging the information here on the 35- and 37-type ships to the relevant pages, leaving summaries here. I trust that's OK with everyone. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:43, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, done (finally!) The new pages are at the main article links in each case. Xyl 54 (talk) 01:51, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split?
Talk:List of mosques in Singapore

message: *Masjid Alkaff (Upp Serangoon Road) 
*Masjid Alkaff (Kg Melayu)
*Masjid Al-Mukminin
*Masjid Al-Taqua
*Masjid Anggullia
*Masjid An-Nur
*Masjid Ar-Raudhah
*Masjid Assyafaah
*Masjid Assyakirin
*Masjid Ba'alwie
*Masjid Bidadari (ceased operation June 30, 2007)
*Masjid Darul Aman
*Masjid Dawoodi Bohra (Burhani) 
*Masjid Hajjah Rahimabi
*Masjid Haji Mohd Salleh (Geylang Road)
*Masjid Haji Muhd Salleh (Palmer Road)
*Masjid Haji Yusof
*Masjid Hasanah
*Masjid Hussein Sulaiman
*Masjid Jamae (Queenstown)
*Masjid Jamiyah Ar-Rabitah
*Masjid Kassim
*Masjid Kampong Delta
*Masjid Kampung Holland
*Masjid Kampong Siglap
*Masjid Khadijah
*Masjid Khalid
*Masjid Moulana Md Ali
*Masjid Muhajirin
*Masjid Mujahidin
*Masjid Zaid Harith
*Masjid Mydin
*Masjid Omar Salmah
*Masjid Penempatan Melayu Sembawang
*Masjid Pulau Bukom
*Masjid Pusara Aman
*Masjid Tasek Utara
*Masjid Tentera Di-Raja
*Masjid Wak Tanjong  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.228.93.230 (talk) 22:50, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo-List

message: According to muis.gov.sg, Masjid Darussalam was completed in 1989. However, based on firsthand source (Darussalam website), it was “officially opened” on “27 December 1988”. WeakishJiang (talk) 18:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The completion date of Masjid Darussalam
Talk:List of television stations in Southeast Asia

message: Is missing. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 20:15, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hong Kong? 
Talk:Abdominal angina

message: "Abdominal angina" IS NOT used in reference to angina pectoris, but to "angina" itself, see e.g. :de:Angina, so the redirect from "angina" to "Abdominal angina" is not correct either. -- Robodoc.at 09:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Terrorism in Uganda

message: Strange, but I can find no link to Uganda. Maybe I'm missing something. I will set the first instance but, it's at the bold part of the intro. If it's wrong to do that, I hope the person who changes it will add a link where it would be more appropriate. --71.110.90.242 (talk) 04:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 

message: "On 5 July 2014, several tribal gunmen armed with machetes and spears attacked in Kasese, Ntoroko and Bundibugyo districts killing civilians, military officers and policemen. It led to loss of 93 people and property worth millions of shillings."  Why isn't this an article? Bokoharamwatch (talk) 14:25, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  1990s
Talk:Aerial View

message: The song "Couldn't Care Less" contains the words, "fuck" and "shit", making it the first song by the band to contain profanity.
I've deleted this part because it's wrong. The song "Club 45" which was released five years earlier on "Bliss Please" contains the sentence "and what has left is just a fucking creep." --89.48.63.119 (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Tampines Mall

message: Was the mall opened it 1995 or 1996? The infobox states 1995 while the article itself states 1996. -- Ouishoebean / (talk) (Humour =)) 10:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on the Association of Shopping Centres website, Tampines Mall opened in 1995. It was then officially opened on 9 Feb 1996, based on lifestylewiki.com. Clarified in the article. —Sengkang 09:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening year