lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Atlantic roundhouse

message: Why see also towers for Atlantic roundhouses?  Only the broch towers - a small and largely unrepresentitive subset of the monument type - have ever been called towers, and they are not really towers anyway, as they were all wider than they were tall. Lianachan 15:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a general encyclopedia, someone interested in Atlantic roundhouses might also be interested in round towers. They are not that different from each other in a more general sense. -- Stbalbach 15:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. Round towers and atlantic roundhouses are separated in time, purpose, geographical distribution and architecture.  You might as well add see also lighthouses, for all the relevance. A link in the broch page might be applicable, by your argument, but not here. This page is about atlantic roundhouses in general, not the tiny proportion of them that were tall. Lianachan 15:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just a "see also" to help readers find related articles which exist on Wikipedia. These are all very old stone round structures unique in the British isles (and Ire) for which not much history is known. I'm from the US and we just don't have things like this here, so they all seem kind of related to me. If you want we can "see also" on just Irish round tower and broch. The article is just a stub really it seems better to invest energies into expanding it then debate over see also's. -- Stbalbach 16:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The kinds of structures may seem related to you from a distance in the US, but I can assure you that they are not. I also think that the implication of a relationship by the nature of the very presence of such a link is potentially misleading to others who know nothing about the structures.  You're right that there's definately no point in debating see also's, especially since relevance doesn't seem to be a factor. Never mind, I'll add more information to the article in the coming months as and when the opportunities arise. Lianachan 17:25, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Round tower?
Talk:Frequency allocation

message: I'd like to suggest a section on how the Frequency Allocation charts are organized.  Specifically, how are the allocations split into Primary and Secondary service?  A brief description of the less self-explanatory legend items such as "FIXED" could also be included.  I would enjoy initiating this section myself if it weren't for my complete lack of knowledge on the subject. Cheers,Wolfworks 06:52, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frequency Allocation Chart 

message: The writing style here is horrible.  The whole article would do well to be rewritten from scratch.  121a0012 (talk) 02:55, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:SOFIXIT is the canonical answer to such complaints.  Anything specifically disturbing to your God-like eyes, or just a general uninformative rant?  If you're looking for bad writing on the Wikipedia, you'll never be disappointed.   --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:13, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: So many bad articles, so little time.  121a0012 (talk) 02:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If we each just do a little...no, that isn't working. I took out some of the really icky bits but this still needs work. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horrible writing 

message: Articles appear to be covering the same ground with only minor changes in wording. McGeddon (talk) 09:26, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no clear reason for a separate stub covering essentially the same topic. –Sparkgap (talk) 16:01, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Frequency allotment]] 

message: What is the example for? What is it trying to demonstrate? Some prose would be helpful. Corwin.amber (talk) 11:45, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example section
Talk:Paul Barnes (pastor)

message: We could use a picture of him, a link to his former church, a link to his own website (assuming he has one).  And many thanks to Tjmayerinsf for getting this article off on the right foot!  Mr Christopher 15:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I need to park this article link here for the moment http://www.denverpost.com/nationworld/ci_4817067 Mr Christopher 15:59, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: starting the muck-raking already, monsieur christophe?  i'd race ya', but i've got a novel in pre-submission at the moment.  can't all these ministers just wait in the closet a little longer?  
But i'll give up the novelist bit if pat robertson comes out.  actually, i'll also give up homosex, too.  --Chalyres 11:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Kudos to Elembis for the recent edits/improvments to the article.  I characterized Haggard's activities as "alleged" since Haggard has yet to admit to any specifics.  Mr Christopher 17:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is so much fun
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Smitty494

message: User:Smitty494
      run at Wed Dec 13 15:29:43 2006 GMT
Mainspace	1
User talk:	4
User:	5
Wikipedia:	4
avg edits per article	1.40
earliest	21:43, 21 November 2006
number of unique articles	10
total	14
Editcount generated using Interiot's wannabe Kate's Tool. Nishkid64 15:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Kumho Asiana Group

message: I don't think we should merge in Kumho Polychem since no other Kumho Asiana Group Subsidiaries have been merged in (they all have their own article). I'll give a couple of weeks for other peoples' ideas. Cliff12345 (talk) 20:23, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll give it a few more days for any objections till I remove merger tag. Cliff12345 (talk) 11:25, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok I'm removing merger tag. Cliff12345 (talk) 08:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merging in of Kumho Polychem
Talk:Grannus

message: I'm not so sure that the "grian" similarity can really be used to deduce that Grannus was a sun deity. The Irish name Gráinne (as in the story of Dermod and Gráinne) is not normally acknowledged as having sun as its etymology, even if many mythographs have wanted to associate her with solar symbolism. --Svartalf 15:32, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sun god ?
Talk:DirectBand

message: I've read somewhere that Microsoft has committed to keep the network up and running at least until some specific date, but I don't remember what that date is.  Does anyone know?  NCdave (talk) 16:15, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How long are they committed to keep the network running? 
Talk:Studio transmitter link

message: Over the air digital channels can handle 19.39Mbps. A T1 handles only 1.544Mbps. An E1 handles only 2.048Mbps. You need at least a T3, E3, or OC-1 to handle HDTV. Jesse Viviano (talk) 22:45, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Dan100 (Talk) 12:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't a T1 or E1 too small to handle HDTV? 

message: There is no difference between Studio/transmitter link and Transmitter/studio link; the former is the preferred use. TSL should be merged into STL. algocu (talk) 14:29, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a big difference- these are one-way links. STL means a flow of data to the transmitter, while TSL is a flow of data from the transmitter back to the studio. 76.253.135.178 (talk) 04:55, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It wouldn't be a problem to cover both in the same article since they operate similarly and are usually used together. ~Kvng (talk) 16:36, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 21:53, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Suggested 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --r.e.b. (talk) 15:46, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Dvin (ancient city)

message: Hopefully we can get more pictures of this site.  I added the correct GPS coords.  Please visit the site next time you go to Armenia :).  Serouj (talk) 16:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for pictures 

message: The statement about the slaughter that took place in the Arab conquest of the city came verbatim (copyright violation) from A History of Armenia, by Vahan M. Kurkjian. HOWEVER: a critical review of this work states "caution, though, is unfortunately in order. The author is clearly not a professional historian, and his book is not a scholarly work; rather, a general text based on ill assimilated (and now dated) secondary works."  We'll need a much more solid reference for any estimate of the casualties.50.111.36.238 (talk) 01:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: "The Arabs appeared in Armenia first in 640. In 642 they captured the capital, Dvin, and many of the inhabitants were killed." - Armenia-The Survival of a Nation(1980) -Christopher Walker 50.111.36.238 (talk) 01:26, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: removed unref'd statement

message: ∮7 = ___________________, ∑8∭7A (8,13,49,60) B (9,18,57,83) A∆__, ∭8ℂ (5∞−7≫0∑1∂14,57×197ℵ0⊕7∠12°⊉7!,______________________________________________×______√___≜_____⊕______∭__________=________)ᐕ  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:C0EA:5770:600F:238D:2259:DAB (talk) 22:14, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bài toán 

message: Divine power 123.253.92.241 (talk) 12:11, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Gliwice Radio Tower

message: There reads: The Gliwice Radio tower is the third tallest wooden structure in the world.
Well, which ones are the first and second tallest? 85.217.42.90 (talk) 17:52, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Caribou Lou

message: I have just integrated the information from this "article" into the List of cocktails. At its best, this article was a confusing and contradictory stub. --Willscrlt 23:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have moved content from here to List of cocktails, this page history needs to stay in order to maintain the author attribution which is required by the GFDL. These pages should be redirects instead. Angela. 23:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ready to Delete
Talk:Linear response function

message: In the example of the harmonic oscillator, it seems that the dimensions are not right in the Fourier transform of the linear response function...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthurdenhaan (talk • contribs) 13:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

message: Isn't a transducer something that changes one form of energy to another? Yet a linear response function applies even when the form of energy that carries the signal remains the same, such as in the transfer function of an electronic filter. I haven't changed it because I can't think of a different word at the moment. 84.227.225.36 (talk) 05:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Transducer?
Talk:AEG C.VI

message: OK where did the C.VI come from? I have one of the best resources (in english) on German WWI aircraft and there is no mention pf the C.VI whatsoever!!!!!!!
WHIH, is somebody just writing an article because they are assuming that there was a C.VI just because there was a C.V and C.VII?Petebutt (talk) 05:26, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imagination
Talk:Premiere Networks

message: The "Program schedule" section contains a full schedule, in violation of WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE, a content policy. A simple list of current programs may be acceptable. 2602:306:C5B4:E3D0:F819:FB5F:D6FD:C257 (talk) 02:18, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NOTRADIOGUIDE]]
Talk:Aereon III

message: I've tagged the claim that Aereon III was meant for the USN as "citation needed." None of the sources I know of—the Douglas Robinson article I've linked to in the Flight archive, McPhee's The Deltoid Pumpkin Seed, or William Miller's paper The Dynairship, delivered at the 1974 Monterey Interagency Workshop on Lighter-than-Air Vehicles (available here as a 37 MB pdf; the paper starts on page 439 of the file)—supports this. Grover Snodd (talk) 19:11, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now made the changes, plus a couple of other ones. I plan to expand the article soon. The USN references can go back in if anyone can verify them. Grover Snodd (talk) 18:33, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intended for USN? 
Talk:Aerfer Sagittario 2

message: I think that the english version should include some translation, bibliography and so on from the italian version, which appears to be more complete.
By the way, this is a common issue among articles in various languages, usually stuff in the same language as subject is more complete.
79.55.41.158 (talk) 11:45, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested improvements 
Talk:Aerial Distributors Distributor Wing

message: The article lists the 'University of Wichita' and the 'University of Robbins'.  I find no references to either of those schools.  The closest is Wichita State University for the former but I find nothing remotely related to a 'University of Robbins' in California (or anywhere else).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by William von Zehle (talk • contribs) 06:00, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academic references
Talk:Aériane Swift

message: Mannfred Ruhm, a celebrated microlight pilot, is said to have an interest in (that is, to be closely involved in) the Aériane Swift.  The Ruhm name is on the WP List of gliders, and there are YouTube films of him flying Aériane Swift aircraft in the Alps.  Does anyone have any more details? Arrivisto (talk) 23:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mannfred Ruhm
Talk:Valkenburg Castle

message: The following statement was removed from the article, could not find any reference and the user IP seems to be vandalizing a lot. --Memming 15:50, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: — Assignment last updated by ERivera1259 (talk) 02:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Architectural History
Talk:Sirius XM NFL Radio

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: MOVED (non-admin closure) Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:23, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: SiriusXM NFL Radio →  – Zacharycook's recent spate of illogical and contradictory RM proposals did have the effect of causing us to notice some inconsistency among our articles about Sirius XM channels: while the vast majority of them have a space between Sirius and XM, a few (including this one) do not. In discussion, WP:WPRS determined that while the company's logo stylizes its name as SiriusXM without a space, in text the company is consistently referred to as Sirius XM with a space, even in its own press releases about itself. Accordingly, this should be moved to Sirius XM with a space. Bearcat (talk) 15:07, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 January 2018
Talk:Digital audio radio service

message: This page seems a munge between the generic "digital audio radio service" term and the specific technology of SDARS. Can any USAian advise whether the dars term is used equally for non-SDARS systems, such as HD Radio? Maybe the page should be split? --MilkMiruku (talk) 18:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Munged content?
Talk:Immune tolerance

message: I am planning to significantly edit this page in the coming weeks. I will include a formal definition, history, sections on central and peripheral tolerance (with links to the appropriate Wikipedia articles), examples of immune tolerance in physiology and medicine, and current thoughts on the evolution and tradeoffs of immune tolerance. Please let me know if you have any comments on that right now before I begin my edits. KMKc (talk) 21:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upcoming changes 

message: On merge with central tolerance:
I don't think so. At the moment it looks attractive simply because both are stubs. But if there was a decent coverage of this topic then immune tolerance would be a massive article (with 30 000 peer-reviewed articles written on it, the topic is huge and varied). I think immune tolerance should basically remain an overview article, with links to the specific forms of immune tolerance, such as central tolerance, negative selection, regulatory T cell conversion, oral tolerance, etc etc). Sad mouse 16:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with central tolerance 

message: The first sentence could (and should) first give a definition, before diving into the subject of distinctions (between natural and induced tolerance).
The sentence reads (at the time of writing this on 2009-09-24):
"... can be either (a) 'natural' or 'self tolerance', where the body does not mount an immune response to self antigens, or (b) 'induced tolerance', where tolerance to external antigens can be created by manipulating the immune system.".
Jacosi (talk) 11:13, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A definition should be inserted 

message: Hi, I was adding some more reliable sources to this page and I came across some more information that could be added to expand this page. Just a suggestion, but I think it would be beneficial to add more information on the topic of peripheral tolerance. I found a couple sources that include this topic and have listed them below:
Immunology: essential and fundamental (2005) by Sulabha Pathak, Urmi Palan
Antigen presenting cells: from mechanisms to drug development  (2005) By Harald Kropshofer, Anne B. Vogt
Immunology: a short course By Richard Coico, Geoffrey Sunshine 
page 186
 
--Naf24 (talk) 22:01, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding more information on Peripheral tolerance
Talk:Polymerase

message: ¨ The nucleic acid polymerisation reaction is catalysed by a wide variety of enzymes that can be classified into two major mechanistic categories: template dependent (that need an existing polymer to use as a basis for catalysis of a new strand) and template independent (that can polymerase nucleic acids without the need for a pre-existing strand) nucleotidyl transferases.
The group of template dependent polymerases refers to enzymes that use a nucleic acid template to produce a new RNA or DNA molecule, and are classified according to template/product preferences:
(i)	DNA-dependent DNA polymerases (DdDPs)
(ii)	DNA-dependent RNA polymerases (DdRPs)
(iii)	RNA-dependent DNA polymerases (RdDPs), also known as reverse transcriptases (RT)
(iv)	RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRPs)¨
Metisalfa 16:12, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template/Product preferences 

message: :"It is an accident of history that the enzymes responsible for the catalytic production of other biopolymers are not also referred to as polymerases."
Not also referred to as? What did the author mean by this sentence? Are they or are they not referred to as polymerase? Redtails (talk) 18:34, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production of other biopolymers 

message: rare forms of lab made polymerase are able to create RNA and DNA not via cloning but from fundamental components  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:4109:4C00:1819:DEC2:D0BC:9571 (talk) 21:42, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  polymerase as the ancestor of life
Talk:CBC Radio

message: CBC Radio doesn't have advertising so this section is misleading and should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.64.9 (talk) 07:16, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising? 

message: The article says nothing about the budget for CBC Radio services. Is that information available? From a quick look at financial information on the CBC's own web site, it groups together "television, radio and new media service costs". Mathew5000 (talk) 17:43, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget? 

message: Hi, everyone. As part of a master's class, I am editing this page to add some information on CBC Radio's podcasts. I will be adding information slowly over the next few days. Thanks! Hmbooth7 (talk) 21:27, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I am done adding information. Hmbooth7 (talk) 23:42, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Podcasts 
Talk:MD Helicopters MD Explorer

message: Not sure MD Helicopters MD Explorer sounds right certainly it is not a common name for the helicopter, suggest it may be better named MD Explorer. Any thoughts ? MilborneOne (talk) 13:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: MD Helicopters is the name of the Company, and MD Explorer is the name of the aircraft - that follows WP:AIR/NC's guidelines. However, I do agree it is a mouthful! I'd be OK with MD Explorer for simplicity's sake. - BilCat (talk) 16:22, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: Isn't this the helicopter that fell out of the transport in the James Bond films? Bachcell (talk) 15:42, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Die Another Day