lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Burnt sienna

message: I would say, wrong idea to use this stripe. You say that Burnt sienna is mid brown. I don´t know how it looks at screen, but in real it is much more darker, I mean dark brown. This looks like a Cadmium orange.--Juan de Vojníkov 12:19, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

message: David Morrell has written a novel with the name Burnt Sienna. Shouldn't that be mentioned on the page somewhere? Maybe a trivia section? --Siddhant (talk) 10:12, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novel by the same name 

message: The color in that image is definitely not burnt sienna, although the image name says so! Probably it shows raw sienna. So the color info box has to be corrected too. -- PyroPi (talk) 07:02, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong image 

message: Everyone hated this color the most in their Crayola crayon boxes in elementary school.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.231.150.231 (talk) 03:58, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The worst Crayola color

message: This article is short, and a lot of the info in it is redundant to Sienna.  So I propose that this article be merge to a shade of Sienna Purplebackpack89≈≈≈≈ 14:59, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Sienna]]?
Talk:Tula de Allende

message: Need to split out into separate articles - one for the pre-Columbian site, the other for the contemporary settlement. Just a note until I or someone gets around to it...--cjllw | TALK 04:51, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  article split 

message: At Tula, you are told that that is a butterfly motif on the chests of the warriors. The Spanish WP article also makes mention of this.Varlaam (talk) 04:45, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Butterfly warriors 

message: We need to change, the subcategory 'Tula de Allende town an The municipality in Demography section, there are topics about towns inside Tula de Allende municipality.--Marrovi (talk) 15:55, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Municipality of Tula de Allende 
Talk:Tres Zapotes

message: The following sentence in the article contains a contradiction:  Founded some time in the centuries before 1000 BCE, Tres Zapotes emerged as a regional center early in the Middle Formative period, perhaps 900 - 800 BCE, roughly coinciding with the decline of San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan.900 - 800 BCE is not "in the centuries before 1000 BCE.  1000 BCE is before 900 BCE.  900 BCE is before 800 BCE.  When was Tres Zapotes founded? ErinHowarth (talk) 19:33, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. It's not a contradictory statement, though I can see how it might be ambiguously read that way. Evidence for occupation at the site dates as far back, like it says, to sometime in the 2nd millennium BCE (with some Ocos phase artefacts, going back maybe as far as 1700BCE). The site later develops characteristics of a regional centre, in the Middle Formative (900-800 BCE), for a period of time (it later declines again, then has some revivals as a significant centre once more, or several times more, over the following millennium). It is generally understood to have had a very long, practically continuous occupation, but large segments of this are still quite patchily known. One really can't say exactly when it was founded, but evidence for occupation does go back into that Early Formative period. --cjllw ʘ TALK 14:48, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was Tres Zapotes founded?
Talk:Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures

message: <I>"...but was later found unconstitutional."</i>
Need a source on this. Nashville 13:14, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest contacting The Mary Baker Eddy Library for the Betterment of Humanity they have a staff to answer questions like this. WilliamKF 22:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constitutionality of copyright extension 

message: My recollection from the time is that the copyright extension was the work, not of Haldeman and Erlichman, but of another well-known Christian Scientist, Charles H. Percy, U.S. Senator from Illinois, 1967-1985. I remember also that the extension was to be in perpetuity, something never done before or since. clariosophic 19:28, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright extension

message: The text currently states S&H underwent more than 200 revisions. According to other sources, it underwent more than 400 revisions. --Do go be man 02:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Revisions 

message: The latter part of this paragraph appears to be promoting a cause of a small minority, in violation of [WP:SOAP] It is expressed in unnecessary detail. I propose to trim it. Bblandford (talk) 21:09, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: *https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scienza_e_Salute_con_la_Chiave_delle_Scritture  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.20.93.107 (talk) 08:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  *https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scienza_e_Salute_con_la_Chiave_delle_Scritture
Talk:Qʼuqʼumatz

message: The picture seen on both the Kukulkan page as well as the Gucumatz page say that the ball court marker depicts their respective deities. This obviously can't be the case for the same picture, and since these deities are taken to be distinct ones and not just different names of the same deity a picture on one of the pages should be deleted or replaced. This isn't really a large issue, but I imagine on newer users and readers it may cause some sort of confusion. Kyle Tatum (talk) 09:16, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main picture
Talk:Ixbalanque

message: I don't think the present illustration is apposite. It is not a good idea to illustrate Xbalanque by GIII (an identification about which there is no consensus)instead of by his own image, whether as a name glyph, a personified number, or as a full figure. Retal 23:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

message: To my mind, there should be two different entries: (1) Popol Vuh, with an overview (rather than a lengthy retelling, as it is now) of the creation myth, the twin myth, and the historical parts; and (2)Maya Hero Twins, focussing on the characteristics of the twins and their representation in Classic Maya art. Within this second article, Xbalanque and Hunahpu could be discussed separately. Their individual articles, as they exist now, should be merged into it. 'Xbalanque' and 'Hunahpu' can then become redirects.86.87.62.150 08:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree about merging the twins into this. Don't know enough about Popol Vuh to suggest any changes in format, but I will read up on it and suggest whatever I can. In the meanwhile, if you could, be WP:BOLD and go ahead with the changes you suggest. I'm sure someone will come along to help. Thanks!  - xC -  | ☎  16:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge the twins?
Talk:Chin (deity)

message: This article was replaced with text about a completely different deity than the one implied in the article. I have reposted that text here.
Chin A goddess of the moon in the mythology of the Muysca Indians of Bogota.   She is associated with water and is said to have flooded the earth  <BR>
==References==
--—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.192.241.98 (talk • contribs) 2 January 2008
:Thanks. I would presume that that alteration was innocently made, it seems like someone in good faith searching Googlebooks for a reference to this deity, and mistakenly pulling up a source that discussed an entirely different entity from a different culture altogether.
:Just to add, I wonder really whether there is sufficient extant documentation of this purported Maya character to justify an article; a momentary passing reference in Breve historia (which I haven't yet been able to find) would seem to be the full extent of it, as far as primary/secondary sources go.   --cjllw ʘ TALK 06:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate meaning

message: I've searched some sources and I can't find any reference to a Mayan god that matches this article's description. Does anyone know of any references to Chin in reliable sources? It seems like this deity may be unverifiable, and/or so obscure that it doesn't meet Wikipedia's threshold of notablity. --Muchness (talk) 18:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nominate for deletion?
Talk:Camazotz

message: The pop culture section is much longer than the entire rest of thre article. I don't know if this should be considered completeness (which would be good) or excessive (bad).  RJFJR (talk) 23:48, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:TRIVIA, the latter. Thought it had been trimmed a little while ago, but seems there's been more regrowth. Just about the whole lot could be junked, the fact that videogame designers & fantasy novelists mine Mesoam. mythologies for the names of their characters does is nothing remarkable, IMO. I don't see much there that adds any understanding to this topic. --cjllw ʘ TALK 02:14, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pop culture section

message: This article was absolutely awful. I've culled half of it, and the truth is most of the rest should go too. I'll see if I can dig up something better shortly. Simon Burchell (talk) 00:54, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I've dumped a lot of rubbish and have rewritten what was left. I also removed this article from WikiProject Mexico - the Popul Vuh is Guatemalan. Simon Burchell (talk) 02:36, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite needed 

message: Camazotz is the fourth of the Nine Lords of the Night featured on the Mayan Haab' calander.  This should be mentioned in the mythology section of the article.  207.216.208.68 (talk) 19:20, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understand it, the month was associated with the bat glyph, but not specifically with the K'iche' Camazotz. However, if you have a reference, put it in. Simon Burchell (talk) 19:31, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nine Lords of the Night
Talk:Xquic

message: There does not seem to be a reason not to merge this article with that on the hero twins, where the entire story of the twins is set out in great detail.131.211.214.61 14:53, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Hero Twins 

message: I removed the recently added comparative religion section, this seemed quite apparent original research and original synthesis. In this case, there is no actual connection between Xquic and Old World deities/mythology such as Isis, and saying "Isis may be equivalent to Xquic" has no real meaning or validity. Insofar as there is a point to comparing disparate and separated mythologies, it is more a reductive exercise and attempt to identify underlying common principles and motivations, not to portray or suppose there is some actual historical influence or connection where there clearly was nothing of the kind. Such comparative mythology exercises should be left to published scholars not wikipedia editors, and are out-of-place in articles like this. Also, statements which claim that elephant-like animals persisted here up to the time when Maya monuments were being built and thereby suggesting an origin to supposed elephantine depictions are clearly not supported by any contemporary Mayanist scholar. The cite given was for a 1924 article in The Burlington Magazine, that quoted diffusionist views of Grafton Elliot Smith—views that were pretty much discredited even at the time, let alone in the present era of research. It is quite misleading to rely on such an evidently outdated and fringe viewpoint.
The section on appearances in the Borgia codex was also removed, I doubt very much that León-Portilla identifies Xquic as a figure in that codex, which after all is a central Mexican codex, not K'iche'Maya. Again, this very much appears as an original, unsubstantiated interpretation that would not be found in reliably published sources.--cjllw ʘ TALK 01:54, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparative religion
Talk:Ah Puch

message: I removed the passages inserted in these edits, as they are close paraphrases of text appearing on this external site. It would be far better to completely revise the information without reproducing the text of an external site. There are also better published sources around that could be used, in preference to that one. --cjllw ʘ TALK 06:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text 

message: I created the article Maya Death Gods, so that this article is no longer needed.Retal (talk) 00:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  deletion proposal
Talk:Ixtab

message: There is so little factual information on Ixtab that calling this page a 'stub' does not seem to make much sense.77.162.130.139 08:40, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub? 

message: What are the dire consequences of a lunar eclipse for women? Inhumandecency (talk) 05:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  lunar eclipse 

message: In revising this page and throwing out a lot of blabla, I also deliberately left out the Dresden picture, which would otherwise automatically, and incorrectly, be viewed as a depiction of Ix Tab.Retal (talk) 15:47, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  no picture 

message: It seems some published novels mentioned in Rick Riordan Presents give modern stories about Ixtab, specifically The Storm Runner and The Fire Keeper. Not a reliable source, maybe, so this may be non-notable. HLHJ (talk) 01:54, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Rick Riordan Presents]] 

message: I thought she was some Maya godess of death. 73.20.50.209 (talk) 16:26, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  God of death? 

message: Or a master of deception 73.20.50.209 (talk) 16:08, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Or a master of deception
Category talk:Wikipedians in Kentucky

message: Some Wikipedians from Kentucky are forming a local context encyclopedia and WikiCity at KENTUCKY.WIKIA.COM. (Kentuckia for short)
These Kentuckypedians invite all Kentuckians to contribute content about their local communities that may be too trivial for Wikipedia Proper. see Wikipedia:Notability
:Note that many Kentucky city articles here in the Wikipedia could use some work too. —  Stevie is the man!  Talk | Work 15:20, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kentuckia 

message: All Wikipedians in Kentucky are urged to join or contribute anonymously to the newly-formed Wikipedia:WikiProject Kentucky to improve and polish Wikipedia content about Kentucky.  
One of our main objectives is to create and maintain the proposed Portal:Kentucky to add to the growing list of other state and commonwealth Portals related to the United States: Oklahoma, Puerto Rico, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Wisconsin.
We hope you'll join us in this exciting project! CQ 11:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Kentucky
Talk:Jones diagram

message: This is one of those articles where you can read it and still have no idea what they are talking about. Someone who knows more about the technical aspects of whatever this is might find this link useful, though it was the only non-Wikipedia relevant link I found on Google. If something isn't done with this relatively soon, I'll probably put it up for deletion. It isn't exactly the Zone System or anything. Recury 18:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the diagram link!  I am new to Wikipedia, so please bear with me.  I find the Jones diagram useful in general engineering work but had a very hard time finding information about it, so I posted what I had thinking others might be interested.  I have not had time since to add more information.  -Cxw 20:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, makes sense. It probably doesn't need a ton more information for right now, but what's already there should be clarified. Like I don't quite get what Jones diagrams would be used for in photography. And is the link that I posted an example of what you were talking about there? And in the second paragraph, what exactly makes a Jones diagram different from a normal graph? Recury 21:41, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I think I have a handle on what it is now, and I've just made some style changes from your last edit and tried to clarify the language a bit. Recury 18:08, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: One of those

message: This page talks of axes as if they were rays. An axis is not a ray. An axis is a line. It is not sensible to talk of a "positive X axis", because the positive direction is only part of the axis. It is however correct to say "the positive portion of the X axis". The conventional Cartesian coordinate plane only has two axes. 
I am about to rewrite some of the article to try to correct the error, and hopefully increase its readability.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.242.232.209 (talk) 20:34, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misunderstanding of what an axis is
Talk:Wall spider

message: The article says "They possess an organ called a cribellum, which is a kind of comb-like device used to separate fibers of silk drawn from its spinnerets into many extremely fine fibers".  Isn't this a misleading description of the cribellum?  Isn't it, in fact, a description of the calamistrum? -Jared Beck 2010.10.07  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaredbeck (talk • contribs) 03:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: clarification on cribellum vs. calamistrum

message: the statements in this article are of a generality bordering on the useless. the lemma could also aptly be named "web spider". any specialists out there? -- Kku 12:36, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: too general
Talk:Emerald City (film)

message: I think this should be merged with Emerald City (play). Scottandrewhutchins 02:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This article includes content previously included in the Emerald City (play) article. --Shirt58 (talk) 15:26, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia|WP:COPYWITHIN]] notice
Talk:Alexander Column

message: Named after Emperor Alexander I, who ruled Russia between 1801 and 1825, the column is an interesting piece of architecture and engineering... It is set so nicely that no attachment to the base is needed.
I think this sounds a bit puerile, and more importantly undescriptive.
* I agree; what on earth does "It is set so nicely that no attachment to the base is needed" actually mean?? I like the article, and kudos to the author(s), but the grammar is appalling. How did this make the main page? Satyricon uk 16:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  weak adjectives don't really explain what the author means
Talk:Vera Ralston

message: in ice skating in 1936? Compare  "1936 Winter Olympic Games" and "Vera Ralston" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.220.228.245 (talk • contribs) 
In  the summer of 1992, Ralston attened the national convention of Laurel&Hardy fans(SONS OF THE DESERT) in Las Vegas,Nevada.
Her "connection" was THE FIGHTING KENTUCKIAN(1949),in which Oliver Hardy had a solo supporting role.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.23.5.11 (talk) 18:05, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who won silver medal
Talk:Christy Canyon

message: There is no source for this claim, and this information is not in one of the interviews shown as sources on various issues. Please add. And no information on what happened to the kid? In addition, is there a reason why her (supposedly ?) real name is not in?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.229.197.65 (talk) 17:15, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christy Canyon pregnant by Jon Dough and some other minor issues 

message: Sorry but compilations don't count for movies Christy has performed in.  It's like saying Marilyn Monroe appeared on Entertainment Tonight because they showed a clip from one of her movies. While it's sort of true, it's not something you add to her Filmography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hondo77 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inflated Movie Count 

message: So, how is the OMD mention not spam but the book mention is spam? Not being a jerk, I really am curious. Hondo77 (talk) 16:43, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spammy Mentions 

message: She talks about Robin Williams in a radio interview with Alex Bennett on KITS-FM in San Francisco, need to find documentation ~~ Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 12:39, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Ex-Boyfriend
Talk:Christopher and Cosmas

message: This article contained a postage stamp under a "fair use" claim. Please bear in mind that:
* The stamp was being used to illustrate the subject of the stamp, not the stamp itself
* The stamp copyright tag explicitly states that "It is believed that the use of postage stamps to illustrate the stamp in question (as opposed to things appearing in the stamp's design)" is fair use. If a fair use claim is to be made in this article, then it has to be using something other than the standard stamp copyright tag.
* The image lacks a fair use rationale. It needs a specific fair use rationale in addition to the copyright tag, for each single article in which it is used (so it would need one individually for use in this article). At present there is no stated rationale. 
If the stamp is to be used in this article, these points need to be rectified in some way. For further information see Wikipedia:Fair use, which explains the limitations on use of "fair use" doctrine in Wikipedia. TheGrappler 19:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stamp

message: This article states that Cavendish seized the Santa Ana near Cabo San Lucas, which is on the southern tip of Baja California. However, the Thomas Cavendish article states that the Santa Ana was seized near Acapulco - many hundreds of miles away. Anybody able to confirm the site of the seizure of the Santa Ana? NorCalHistory 22:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cavendish seizure of Santa Ana 

message: Helping at the Hasekura Tsunenaga FAR and found a source that may be helpful for this article: 
Zupotachyon (talk) 08:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential source
Talk:Asbat an-Ansar

message: Please help verify the content of this article from reputable independent sources. (See WP:VERIFY).
Note: this article contains some text loosely translated from the German Wikipedia article on Asbat al-Ansar. However, other Wikipedia articles cannot be regarded as independent sources, and should never be cited as source references for Wikipedia articles.  -- The Anome 12:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 comment

message: I've been looking for a Wikipedia article on this group for two months! Finally I've found it. KazakhPol 21:29, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Finally

message: It is my understanding that the two names (Asbat al-Ansar, Osbat al-Ansar) are two alternative spellings for the same name.  I am not overly familiar with the subject or with Wikipedia's processes so please forgive any mistakes or improper procedure steps. Icecrystal23 03:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge