lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Socioeconomics of the Ottoman enlargement era

message: == The name of the topic ==
The name of the article must be changed. Enlargement ends by the end of the 16th century. But the article entails the reign of Selim III who lived at the end of 18th century. A more appropriate name may be Socioeconomics up to Modernization efforts or up to the end of 18th century. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 19:27, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: The name of the article must be changed. Enlargement ends by the end of the 16th century. But the article entails the reign of Selim III who lived at the end of 18th century. A more appropriate name may be Socioeconomics up to Modernization efforts or up to the end of 18th century. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 19:27, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of the topic 

message: This entire article is problematic. It's incomplete, cites no sources, and passes casually from inaccurate statement to inaccurate statement. As it currently stands it should have no place on Wikipedia - but if it's not to be deleted it at least has to be entirely rewritten from the ground up. Chamboz (talk) 16:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flawed Article
Talk:Massachusetts Communications College

message: I've found conflicting information as to exactly how the name was changed, and the school's own website currently displays a name different from what I found listed with the Massachusetts Department of Education. I think this page should, eventually, be merged and redirected to a new article under the present-day name — whether that's New England Institute of Art, or New England Institute of Arts and Communication, or what — but in the meantime, I've left the stub here. Hopefully the school will add something to its website, eventually, explaining the name changes, and we'll be able to correct this entry. Cribcage 18:30, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Wikipedia talk:Featured pictures/Diagrams, drawings, and maps

message: I'm sensing vandalism. I mean, there's now way to check, but do some of these drawings belong? 71.170.35.230 18:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as of right now, all of the pictures you see on this page are indeed featured (including the mad scientist, the villain, the pirate, and the animated horse). howcheng  {chat} 03:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mingin, Myanmar

message: Where specifically is this located? Chris 08:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mingin Township, Kale District, Sagaing Division, see "Myanmar States/Divisions & Townships Overview Map" Myanmar Information Management Unit (MIMU).  --Bejnar (talk) 04:07, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: what state or division?
Talk:Mutual Musicians Foundation

message: Definitely meets WP:N, notable as an important jazz venue - lots of relevant ghits that meet WP:V. Perel 18:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alice Bunker Stockham

message: This assertion: "[...] thus single-handedly establishing shop and home economics classes in the United States," seems strong enough to need a source. Can someone provide one? Perhaps the author of the statement? I'll check back and tag it otherwise. Thanks!
Sugarbat (talk) 00:13, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I am the author of that statement -- and of the entirety of the 2004 start-text for this page, which was illegally copied from my Sacred Sex web site, along with another page that i wrote in 1998 about Paschal Beverly Randolph. The copyist seems to have been based in Latvia. I only just now discovered this copyvio because i am publishing this material in a book called "Down-Home Sex Magic" (Lucky Mojo Curio Co., 2021) and i am horrified to think that when people read my book they will think i stole the text from Wikipedia when the exact opposite is true. Please rewrite this page to reflect your own research or cite my book or my earlier web version by name. See and compare https://www.luckymojo.com/tkstockhamkarezza.html -- catherine yronwode, Notable Wikipedian, not logged in, and a Wikipedian for the past 15 years. 75.101.104.17 (talk) 02:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs citation 

message: "[It] forbade priests and spiritual directors ever to suggest that there was otherwise". What is this supposed to mean? Equinox ◑ 13:07, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad grammar
Talk:Read-through

message: This is my first time editing in Wikipedia and I'm a bit nervous about it.  Nevertheless, the last sentence in the 3rd paragraph from the top of the article, in my opinion should read:
These parts of the script are usually edited down severely for the purposes of the read-through to keep up the pace of the reading.
instead of it reading:
These parts of the script are usually edited down severely for the purposes of the read-through to keep the pace of the reading up.
Djuliajulia (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar change 

message: My understanding is that read-through is a theatre term and "table read" (no hyphen) is the preferred term in the film and television industries.  Most people will see only a handful of theater productions in their lives.  But most people will see many films and television shows, and when they read the news coverage of how those productions are made, the term they most commonly see is "table read."  Any objections to moving this article to the more commonly used title? Coolcaesar (talk) 20:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't this be renamed to table read?
Talk:Clinton, British Columbia

message: Please do not edit this page to add back the information about the private event that happens on private property in Clinton. 
With gratitude,
Countess Melissa Kendal Countess Melissa Kendal (talk) 02:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Or rather, if it's going to be added, it needs to be added because it's gotten coverage in reliable sources (e.g., newspapers). Since the SCA event was unsourced, the removal was in order. —C.Fred (talk) 02:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, Melissa, I can't remember if it was me who added it or not; it's on a Clinton website I believe, which is I think where the attendance figures came from and also the perception that it's a public event. Or maybe it was Stefano di Armani who dropped that number in my lap...I'll make sure it stays out, the Clinton article is on my watchlist....Maras/Lambi Skookum1 (talk) 02:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: To C.Fred, as noted in my reply to Her Grace, I think it's mentioned on a Clinton-oriented website.  But yes, SCA events are closed events, or not publicized to mundanes....Skookum1 (talk) 02:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Other than the occasional notable, widely-publicized one. :) —C.Fred (talk) 03:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: SCA event
Talk:Coal Harbour (Vancouver Island)

message: The last modern whaling station was not the one in Coal Harbour. One existed in Richmond, California until 1971. See Webb, R. L. 2001. “Power Whaling: Industrial Shore Whaling on the West Coast 1905-1972.” In Whale Hunters on Western Shores. Mains’l vol. 37 no. 1. He gives the wrong date (1972 instead of 1971), but gives a good overview of modern whaling on the west coast of North America. Jonas Poole (talk) 03:52, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Last modern whaling station in North America

message: "powered by two WWII US destroyer steam engines" - sound more likely that it was powered by two US destroyer steam boilers. (Most of the steam used in a whaling factory is used for cooking. Mechanical power was generated by small steam enginens, placed wherever power was needed.)
 Abu ari (talk) 15:24, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steam engines ?
Talk:Star system (filmmaking)

message: Much of this article is written as if it were an academic paper, or personal theorising. It presents one particular view of the subject, mostly without references, inline or otherwise. I've not got the background or sources to fix it, but I'm hoping some others will. Ian Page (talk) 21:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research? 

message: I completely agree with Ian, and unfortunately, like Ian, i don't have the expertise to fix this properly.
one example of the major problems in this article is that the opening definition is given as if the subject specifically relates to cinema.  however, later in the body, credit for the origin is given to PT Barnum, who does *live* shows.  And, if live shows do count as part of the origin and history of the 'star system,' then the Wild West shows of Buffalo Bill truly did have big-name 'stars' that were promoted.  This is from the wiki article about Annie Oakley:
"Oakley's "amazing talent"[4] and timely rise to fame[5] led to a starring role in Buffalo Bill's Wild West show, which propelled her to become the first American female superstar."
that alone would discredit this whole article--based on the way it is currently written.  The question is...is the subject matter even legit, or is it just not well-written? I am very worried that the writer created the term and placed it into wiki--thereby creating an identity for the term.  hopefully, someone can investigate this before it becomes accepted without it being a real, peer-reviewed subject.
so far, on a quick search, i have only found people quoting this same article.  someone please look into this asap!
Number.6.freeman (talk) 20:14, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  One-sided, Inconsistent, and Incomplete
Talk:Cobble Hill, British Columbia

message: I think that a map or image showing the location of Cobble Hill would be benificial to someone reading this artical, I myself do not have the means to make a map or somthing of the like, but if someone else could, it would be a great help. Buzzfly 23:28, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Location 
Talk:Oppidum of Manching

message: Please confirm somehow (I'd be interested to see how) that "pfostenschlitzmauer" is the terminus technicus in English (which I strongly doubt; every English page online uses "timber-laced rampart" to mean what the term "Pfostenschlitzmauer" refers to in German). If it is, I would recommend to change "timber-laced rampart" to "pfostenschlitzmauer" throughout the article.  If it is not, the change from
"the murus gallicus or Gaulish wall commonly found in Western Europe, and the pfostenschlizmauer or timber-laced rampart mostly used in the East." (by Mikhailfranco; 18 November 2006)
to
"the murus gallicus or Gaulish wall commonly found in Western Europe, and the pfostenschlitzmauer or post slot wall mostly used in the East." (by 62.6.162.98; 20 November 2006)
should be discussed for a start. Then a change to simply "timber-laced rampart" might be the right thing to do. And especially the name of the english Wikipedia article "pfostenschlitzmauer" should be changed to "timber-laced rampart".
L.S. 19:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I made a major update, extending the aricle with images and adding much text based on the German wiki article. Hope that's ok. athinaios 13:30, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Update
Talk:TriBeCa Productions

message: Firstly, we're using an outdated spelling of Tribeca. Number two, this article should really be titled "Tribeca Enterprises,": The 1993 NYT cite for "TriBeCa Productions" named above in the intro only mentions "TriBeCa Film Center" never "Productions."--A21sauce (talk) 15:20, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  TriBeCa Productions v. Tribeca Enterprises
Talk:Sodom and Gomorrah (1962 film)

message: The film was released in Italy in 1962, but in the US in 1963. Would a 1962 headline date for this article be more appropriate, even though there is a link to the Times (London) article of "Most Popular Films of 1963"? Hipgnostic (talk) 03:48, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  1962 or 1963? 

message: In this movie, is the Prince of Sodom's name spelled Astaroth or Astorath?
In the article, there are many mentions of "Astorath".
The "Cast" section lists Stanley Baker as Prince Astaroth
108.84.121.79 (talk) 15:41, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  In this movie, is the Prince of Sodom named Astaroth or Astorath?
Talk:More Tears

message: Does anyone know if Findlay's line about demagogues was a deliberate allusion to the phrase used by late-Weimar era supporters of Hindenburg, "Better a zero than a Nero"?  (Of course they got Nero in the end anyway...) --67.69.5.181 19:05, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mong Kung

message: According to Google Earth, Mong Kung, labeled as Möng Küng, is located in Shan State at 21°36'16.20"N, 97°31'47.25"E. - cgilbert(talk|contribs) 16:48, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Location and Name
Talk:St Mary's College, Wallasey

message: There's lots of content on the school website, most of which relates to current goings-on. There seems to be no information on the history of the school, so if anyone has this information then it would help expand the article. I've added the category table and a few more bits of information, at least. Madeinsane 19:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: This page has seen extensive vandalism and unsourced changes in the last few days, including 4 different names for the Head. Unless the school webpage is changed or someone provides a reliable source for a change, I'm going to keep reverting to the name listed on the school's website. IP hopping and socking is just going to get people blocked and the page protected. Meters (talk) 19:10, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Vandalism
Talk:Congregation Emanu-El (Victoria, British Columbia)

message: A photo would be nice.Historicist (talk) 02:22, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think, but am not sure, that a friend's yoga studio is in the basement retail space, I'll ask him for one...used to be a martial arts/grappling club there too....also a record store, or was...Skookum1 (talk) 02:24, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I happen to know he was a member of this congregation, and probably on the Building Committee; very interesting life/character, lost on the web on him here and there, more another time when I've got more energy; other members included the Oppenheimer brothers, Robert and David (Robert was Vancouver's first, no second, mayor...).Skookum1 (talk) 03:31, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, someone made it already...Skookum1 (talk) 03:32, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Morris Moss]] bio needed
Talk:Juticalpa

message: Pepe Lobo se suscitó cerca de Juticalpa, pero él nació en Trujillo.  LeRoc ( Discusión) 13:59, 20 abr 2009 (UTC)
: Yo también creo que Mel Zelaya nació en Catacamas, Juticalpa, no.  LeRoc ( Discusión) 14:17, 20 abr 2009 (UTC)
por favor omitir "Olancho.localidad mas violenta",[la realidad es continuidad del servilismo para los caudillos o terratenientesque se apropiaron de las tierras en el pasado, y la disconformidad silenciosa , constante y guerra despaciosa  de desposeidos contra poderosos caudillos adinerados actuales
:No es el Wikipédia Español. Por favor hablar en Inglés o van al Wikipédia Español; Gracias. (Disculpas por mi español terrible). 🌺 Cremastra  (talk) 00:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Pepe Lobo
Talk:Mong Pawk

message: Where specifically is this located? Chris 08:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Google Earth, Mong Pawk is in Shan State at 21°59'44.27"N, 99°38'49.98"E. - cgilbert(talk|contribs) 20:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: what state or division?
Talk:Cowichan Valley

message: Just a point of clarification; this is not the regional district article in this area - the RD is larger than the culture/geographic area known as teh Cowichan Valley, for one thing; this is the region article, the geographic region.  And re the wine content in general I'd recommend in this case and Okanagan and otehrs that Cowichan Valley wine region or Cowichan Valley Wine Region be a subarticle of its own, partly to keep the wine content from dominating the regular human/physical/cultural geography that this article should primarily be about.Skookum1 (talk) 17:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to Buzzfly
Talk:My Ocardial Infarction

message: hey, whats the song janitors band sings?
The song is Barbara Ann. Also, there's a goof in this episode where the cadaver J.D. is practicing on can clearly be seen breathing. Whats the best way to go about adding this information. Wasn't sure if it qualified as "trivia" or not. 38.119.131.88 17:49, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Enrolled bill rule

message: I added some requests for cites regarding the statements that courts are "questioning" the "rigid application of [the] doctrine". The sources provided—at least in the excerpts from them that are included in the article—do not support those statements.
After Famspear added a request for a source backing up the claim that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had yielded to pressure by changing the doctrine, an editor replaced that statement with the following: "A number of courts have questioned a rigid application of this doctrine and have suggested other approaches.", then gave quotes from two cases as an example. Neither of the quotes provided shows the court as "suggesting another approach". In the Kentucky case, the court simply said the rule was an automatic assumption—an assumption which could be overcome with very convincing evidence. No new approach is suggested there.
For the Pennsylvania case, two sentences are quoted. Neither suggests a new approach. And neither on its face shows that the court is limiting the doctrine. The first restates the doctrine. The second says that "it would be a serious dereliction . . . to deliberately ignore a clear constitutional violation."—but that quote alone does not say that the court is limiting the doctrine, since it doesn't mention what would constitute "ignor[ing] a clear constitutional violation". We have no context to determine that the second quote is actually referring to the first. — Mateo SA (talk | contribs) 19:17, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Courts questioning the doctrine?
Talk:Outline of film

message: See Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Major rename proposal of certain "lists" to "outlines".
The Transhumanist 01:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major rename proposal of certain "lists" to "outlines" 

message: See the proposal at the Village pump
The Transhumanist 09:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for this page and all the pages of the set this page belongs to 

message: Guidelines for the development of outlines are being drafted at Wikipedia:Outlines.
Your input and feedback is welcomed and encouraged.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guidelines for outlines 

message: Please add some relevant links to the history section.
Links can be found in the "History of" article for this subject, in the "History of" category for this subject, or in the corresponding navigation templates.  Or you could search for topics on Google - most topics turn blue when added to Wikipedia as internal links.
The Transhumanist 00:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "History of" section needs links! 

message: A discussion is underway that may affect the name of this article.
See: Wikipedia talk:Outlines#Should articles named "Outline of x" be renamed to "List of x topics"?
The Transhumanist 04:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Straw poll and discussion concerning what outlines should be called 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:06, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:Cracker Creek Cone

message: Same deal as Aiyansh River; this should be about the creek, and otherwise (since it's an obscure creek and won't have an article, most likely) the primary article should be Cracker Creek XXXX, whatever XXXX is; this could be a redirect rather than deleting it altogether, but it shouldn't be a mountain/volcano article if the title doesn't contain something to that effect in it.Skookum1 06:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This is a river article, not a volcano one
Talk:Mong Ton

message: Where specifically is this located? Chris 08:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to Google Earth, Mong Ton, labelled as Möng Ton, is in Shan State at 20°18'2.77"N, 98°53'37.13"E. - cgilbert(talk|contribs) 20:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: what state or division?
Talk:Kevin Burns

message: I removed the Star Warriors title (supposed from 2007) since there's no evidence of this title on IMDB Burns' filmography :
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0122745/
There are (for 2007) the two other Star Wars titles, but not Star Warriors... 343KKT Kintaro (talk) 02:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Warriors 

message: also no mention this he's Ed Burns brother and married to Ed's wife's sister (Christy Turlington's sister Kelly). As the world turns.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.68.103.229 (talk) 02:54, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life 
Talk:Crowsnest Range

message: Crowsnest Range is non-existent. It exists only as "Crowsnest Ranges" on peakbagger.com as a grouping of different ranges in the Crowsnest Pass area. There is no official Crowsnest Range toponym recognized by the Canadian government. Recommend that this article be removed. Ron Clausen (talk) 09:17, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crowsnest Range does not exist
Talk:Ultraviolet disinfection

message: I will add some content (images) shortly ...--Billymac00 19:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

message: From here, 1, you will see the exact same wording in both, I don't know which preceded which, but one "lifted" passages from the other, apparently w/o citation.--Billymac00 (talk) 14:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coincident wording issue
Talk:St. Mary's (places)

message: Not all of these are "Places", so either the "Places" header should be removed or the disambiguation pages for "St Mary's University"/"St Mary's College", "St Mary's High School" and this page should be reorganised. Also "St Mary's College" may refer to a High School in the UK so the name is regionally-biased and should be changed. Madeinsane 19:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done some tidying up.  I think all the schools and universities should be in "See also", but Saint Mary's University needs some sorting out first.  I'll be back! CarolGray 12:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All the educational establishments are now in "See also", with separate secondary disambiguation pages for Saint Mary's College, University, Hall, Academy, etc.  So we now just have "Places" and "Places of worship" - where I've only listed those which actually have articles.  There must be thousands of churches called St Mary's... we can't possibly list them all.CarolGray 19:14, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Places"? 

message: Added St. Mary's Lighthouse to the list (near Whitley Bay, Tyne and Wear, England) on 7th Feruary 2007.Beefy_SAFC 22:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "St. Mary's Lighthouse"?