lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Don Quixote characters

message: if we can have lists of races and ships and stuff from star wars and star trek, surely this is acceptable  Ensiform 17:05, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Acceptable

message: The List of Don Quixote characters can not hold more than a line or two about each character. Don Quixote has been thoroughly researched, and every marginal character like Ginés has numerous references in research parers. Therefore, the list should contain a one-line description for each characters, which would link to a more comprehensive page. אודי פסמון (talk) 18:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too much relevant information about each character 

message: I think Gina  article should be merge into this article. Dwanyewest (talk) 01:08, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: This list is currently (June 2020) partly alphabetical and partly grouped by story line. Which should we go with? Aristophanes68 (talk) 05:23, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order
Talk:Stagecoach in Chesterfield

message: Who removed the article?
:It's not an article.  It was a stub that said no more than the title.  I could have speedily deleted it, but instead I made it a redirect.  You've now added a list of routes; it's still not an article, just a timetable without the times.  If there's anything encyclopædic to say about this local bus company, it's not been said — and I seriously doubt that there is anything to be said.  I've returned it to being a redirect. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 18:23, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If you don't like this version, my brother has agreed to leave it Sonic Mew 18:49, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
Well, to be honest, more than half of it could be said about every bus company in the country (they have low-floor buses, etc.), but I suppose that there's enough here to survive as a stub. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 19:03, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: stub

message: Not only doies the text for this aarticle come from the Internet, but a look at the Google search on This growth has been achieved through continued investment by Stagecoach demonstrates just how undistinctive the article is...
As with Trent Barton, either permission to use the material should be given, or the article will have to be removed.  I'm not slapping a copyvio notice on straightaway, in order to give the article-creators time to sort things out. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 18:22, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: The article needs a history section adding on the former firm East Midland Motor Services which was rebranded as Stagecoach when taken over in the 1980s ? IIRC - BulldozerD11 (talk) 01:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  East Midland Motor Services Ltd 
Talk:Otacon

message: Otacon is listed under List of fictitious Jews, which I'm not sure is correct.  I have not played MGS1 and probably missed any information regardng his background during MGS2, so can someone confirm this or otherwise remove it?
:He was listed as "American (Jewish)" on the old MGS offical website. --Paul Soth 01:51, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay then, problem solved. Is the page still up by any chance?--209.147.90.202 04:22, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish? 

message: The article states that it's equipped with a cell processor, as stated at the end of one of the official trailers. Is it so wrong to believe that Kojima is breaking the fourth wall again and referring to the Playstation 3 itself? I mean, the key to winning the console war? Come on! -Pika132
Uhh yeah, you really can just say its breaking the console war. -- Psi edit 19:22, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metal Gear Mk. II 

message: There is no info about Otacon from the 2006 e3 trailer, could we get some (The Bread 03:05, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: E3

message: An editor without a conflict of interest will consider it and act accordingly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roelle Dimalanta (talk • contribs) 00:25, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Please stop making your nonconstructive edits full of fanfiction, breaking the reference links and adding false categories with clearly incorrect information (talk about a 'conflict of interest'!). To anyone else; the article might need reverting to a point before this user started vandalising it, which is around 100 edits to the article since the end of September.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.222.110 (talk) 16:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Confirming that as of December 2020 this article is still being vandalised by Roelle using alt accounts. 180.150.82.232 (talk) 18:35, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Edit Request" An editor without a conflict of interest will consider it and act accordingly.
Talk:Draco (constellation)

message: The RA/Dec we have listed, 15h / +75 degrees, is the same as what we have listed for Ursa Minor.  In fact, that point appears to be inside Ursa Minor.  What's the algorithm for determining these coordinates?  DenisMoskowitz (talk) 23:01, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  RA/Dec 

message: I removed the paragraph of the mythology section that begins with a description of Draco as originally the constellation of the Egyptian goddess Taweret.  I did this for two reasons: 1.) Although the ancient Greeks drew at least occasionally upon Egyptian culture and myth for their own stories, there is nothing-- NOTHING-- about Taweret to tie her as a collection of stars to the same string of stars as the ancient Greek "Draco."  In fact, if anything, Taweret might have been associated with the Big Dipper.  But not Draco.  2.) I found the reference which was used to make the original inference that Taweret was connected to Draco.  It is a "Starry, Starry Night Discovery Book" published in the UK for children ages 9-12, and it contains no citations-- in other words, it appears that the connection of Taweret to Draco was likely entirely a fabrication from a children's guide to astronomy, a guide without any proof of its sources, and therefore an inappropriate piece of info to be playing across Wikipedia.
Wow.  That was a long way of saying, "I took it out 'cause it was wrong."  But there you have it.   KDS4444Talk 07:51, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Taweret removal

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Sidney Hall - Urania's Mirror - Draco and Ursa Minor.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 21, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-06-21. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Sidney Hall - Urania's Mirror - Draco and Ursa Minor.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: quick and easy  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.118.72.187 (talk) 02:48, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism removal

message: This page isn't linked from the disambiguation page for "Draco" - can somebody more wiki-savvy please remedy that? Apologies for my shortcoming! 86.161.5.205 (talk) 19:01, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Scratch Perverts

message: I have just made a few minor edits here - AFAIK the Scratch Perverts begun as a two or three man team and added the other members following their first DMC win, although I could be wrong here.
I also added a paragrpah in to reflect the perverts support of druma nd bass, which could probably benefit from some expansion.
Also, I think the discog needs updating - there have been a few singles and mixes out since this page was done, and i think maybe there could be a section on individual artist releases from the perverts camp. Will Lakeman 17:43, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Edits

message: Love doesn't seem independently to meet WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG, but a merge and redirect could be useful to readers. Boleyn (talk) 13:30, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal: [[Harry Love (record producer)]] to [[Scratch Perverts]]
Talk:National Astronomical Observatory of Japan

message: The article states:
:National Astronomical Observatory of Japan is an astronomical observatory comprised of several facilities sponsored jointly by the United States and Japan.
I didn't know Japan's National Observatory was sponsored by United States.  What kind of sponsorship does this refer to? --- Fukumoto 17:53, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This has since been changed to reflect that the NAOJ has a facility in Hawai but is not sponsored by the US government.Colincbn (talk) 10:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sposorship
Talk:Harry Weese

message: Editors of this article might appreciate this reliable source: The Architecture of Harry Weese. I would edit the article directly but I have a conflict of interest. (See my talk page for details.) Josh Wallaert (talk) 23:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for Expanding the Article 
Talk:Tagora

message: I suggest we simply fuse all the smaller "Planets of the Noon Universe" articles into a single articles (we can title it Other Planets of Noon Universe or something). 
*We can do that. I propose that we name this macro-article "Minor Planets of Noon Universe" and post there any planet that doesn't contain enough infos. "Enough" is, say, info about Ark, not enough is about Tagora. Shall we do that?
*PS: Don't forget your signature, Strannik. :)
--Koveras 11:08, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The information in this article has been merged into Minor Planets of Noon Universe article. Please feel free to delete it. --Strannik 01:20, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice of Deletion
Talk:Rock Goddess

message: I added a few facts and clarified the question of the third album. I have one remaining question which those who know the music world rather better than I may be able to answer. I would have placed this group as exclusively a punkish "rock" outfit in the same vein as Girlschool and Republica. I am therefore unhappy with the description offered as "New Wave and Heavy Metal" but am not sufficiently confident to change it. What say you?
David91
I was there during the NWOBHM and believe me that's the audience that followed them. The same is even more true of Girlschool.
Headshaker 06:07, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:King of Jerusalem

message: Disputed, may be a detail of an Adoration of the Magi by Rubens, see Talk & same image in article Guy of Lusignan. D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 06:24, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Image: Guy de Lusignan

message: This article was tagged with the  tag, which says This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling. As a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, I find that is not the case, and have replaced the tag with {{Dead end, meaning that there are a good many names and places which need Wikilinks. --DThomsen8 (talk) 13:11, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling.  

message: Giving portraints in "list format" is not helpful. If you want to show a 15th-century depiction of Godfrey of Bouillon, that's fine, but it needs a caption so the reader can appreciate what he is looking at.
If we must include graphical elements in list format, it will have to be coins or seals, as this is the type of graphical identification that was available at the time. 
Showing "15th-century Godfrey" simply labelled "portrait" in a list does nothing except perpetuate the misconception that the "Jerusalem cross" is indeed the historical coat of arms of the Kingdom of Jerusalem (in reality, it was first used in the 1280s (on coins and not (that we know) in actual heraldry), i.e. by the very last kings in Acre, and never in Jerusalem). --dab (𒁳) 10:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Then list it as an image. This is the standard used on all monarchical list and history articles. Examples include the ones for France, England and the Holy Roman Empire. Godfrey's image is not the first anachronistic image on Wikipedia on a list and article and it won't be the last. Why must a list be restricted to contemporary images (some which don't exist) and the articles themselves still retain the use of these images? --The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 15:40, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "portraits"

message: Charles V is V only in the German empire: in Aragon he is Charles I. Philip II is Philip I in Aragon; Philip III is II; Philip IV is III; Philip V is IV and Philip VI is V. Why? Because Philip I (Charles I's father) was only King of Castille and he died before his father-in-law, Ferdinand III, king of Aragon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.219.212.108 (talk) 18:22, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Aragonese claimants
Talk:List of political parties in Peru

message: Please stop your Rv War. I do not know what you both want, but a list of political parties in a country should at least include all relevant parties. Parliamentary parties are allways relevant for this kind of lists. One should not include local parties that are not active on a national level. Electionworld = Wilfried (talk 20:30, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop 

message: why on earth do political parties names have to be translated? as they are institution names they should be put in spanish and not in bad english translations. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cesarpez (talk • contribs) 19:37, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:ENGLISH. --Soman 21:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry I've read WP:ENGLISH and I can't understand either. It is not transliteration and No Established Usage actually supports Cersarpez point. PuercoPop (talk) 22:40, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  i dont understand 

message: Why do we have to write the names of each one of these parties two different times?! --Visitweak (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Originally, the first name was in English and the second one in Spanish. At that time the articles were named in English per WP conventions. Then, some user moved the articles to their Spanish names, and replaced the English links with Spanish ones, thereby duplicating the names. --Victor12 (talk) 19:01, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What the heck?

message: In the second table, one of the headings reads "Militants at 31/12/2017". I assume this is something lost in translation, perhaps it means "supporters" or "members"? Danthemankhan 02:46, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: "Militants"?
File talk:Ogallala changes in feet 1980-1995.png

message: Is is possible to clear up the legend of this figure?  Negative change indicates an increase in water level?  Why is there <-40 and >40?  I assume the colors go from blue meaning "wet" to red meaning "dry", but I don't exactly understand how the numbers fit with that. 
Can you put the state borders on the map too, so it is easier to find things, for people that don't know the shape of the Ogallala aquifer by heart? 
Good looking figure, otherwise. --kris 18:46, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The legend is exactly how the program created it from the data, i.e., with the magnitudes within the dataset.  But you're right – the last time I looked the image over I thought exactly the same thing, and I'll probably regenerate it with a new legend.  I also think I'll change the colors so it's a little more clear which is which.  The article currently has a map that shows the aquifer in relation to the states' borders, but that map with this one is a bit redundant.  I think I have the states' borders dataset that I could use to overlay on this same map, thereby killing two birds with one stone. -- Kbh3rd 19:39, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Lethbridge

message: Per the discussion at Talk:Red Deer, Alberta#'Red Deer/Lethbridge is Alberta's third largest city' yet again., the lead of this article has been changed to read "With a recorded population of 101,482 in it 2019 municipal census, Lethbridge became the fourth Alberta city to surpass 100,000 people.", just as how the lead at Red Deer, Alberta has been changed to read "With a recorded population of 100,418 in the Canada 2016 census, Red Deer became the third Alberta city to surpass 100,000 people.". Hwy43 (talk) 05:04, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Red Deer/Lethbridge is Alberta's third largest city' yet again. 

message: Hi  and other talk page watchers: I am reviewing this article for WP:URFA/2020, an initiative to review and fix up articles promoted to featured article status before 2016. I think this article is in great shape, but I have some concerns, outlined below:
*The "History" section does not have any information after 1967. Are there any events worth including of the past 50 years?
*The "Economy" section does not have information after 2008. Is this section up-to-date? The Economy of Lethbridge article might have additional info for this article. 
*The "Demographics" section will need to be updated for the 2021 census when that information is available. 
*There are two books in the "Further reading" section. Can these be consulted and added to the article as sources?
*Some of the references are deadlinks. Can these be updated and archived?
Is anyone willing to resolve the above issues? Please ping me when ready for a more thorough review, or if there are any questions. Z1720 (talk) 21:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The Demographics section will be updated on February 9, 2022. Hwy43 (talk) 06:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

text: These are great recommendations! I will try to see what I can add, but my time is a lot more limited than it was when I helped flesh out the page all those years aog. :) —Kmsiever (talk) 16:48, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  thank you for responding to my notes above. When updates are finished, can you ping me and I will conduct another review? I look forward to marking this article as "Satisfactory" at URFA/2020. Z1720 (talk) 22:10, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:URFA/2020]]
Talk:Mihrimah Sultana

message: NOTE: NONE OF THIS INFORMATION CAN BE VERIFIED BY RECORDS TRACING THE GENEALOGY OF THE IMPERIAL FAMILY OF OSMAN. ACCORDING TO AVAILABLE REFERENCE MATERIALS, MIHRIMAR LIVED FROM 1522 UNTIL 1578 AND MARRIED ONLY ONCE. HER SUPPOSED SECOND HUSBAND, SIR WILLIAM AVERY, CANNOT BE LOCATED IN AVAILABLE REFERENCE MATERIALS. AND THE TEXT SEEMS TO BE TAKEN FROM A WEBSITE CALLED WWW.BIOGRAPHY.MS Mowens35 23:55, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I cannot comment on the facts in the article. What I can say, though, is that biography.ms is an illicit (i.e. not GFDL-compliant) mirror of Wikipedia. Rl 18:50, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is claimed that she accompanied her father to Egypt. Any reliable source ? I am not a historian. But so far I 've never heard anything about Suleiman's  campaign or travel to Egypt. (His reign is quite well documented) The only sultan to Egypt was Selim I, Suleiman's father. 
I think this article needs the attention of a historian. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 14:11, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suleiman to Egypt ? Sure ? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Mihrimah Sultan which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 17:31, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:2006 Maryland General Assembly election

message: I anticipate that several controversial points may be made on the assessment of the races.  Let us try to moderate them here on this page rather than on the article itself.
Here are things that need to get done to make the article useful:
* add lines between districts for clarity
* break up beginning table of contents into two columns, first is Delegates, second is Senate
* in the table of contents, think about eliminating everything but the District
--Noitall 18:49, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Anticipation

message: In this article, all the red links should be removed and possibly replaced by boldfaced text. Almost none of the people linked to are notable (see Wikipedia:Notability) and most of the blue links are directed at the wrong people. --Jadriaen 03:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove the red links
Talk:Extra-European Caucasoid

message: It would be good to have some cites using the term or information on who originated the term. Googling, I can't find any use of "Midean" with the meaning given here, except possibly the questionable-looking http://www.network54.com/Forum/241642?it=12  
I don't know of any scientists who maintain that Caucasoids outside of Europe form a taxonomically or genetically distinct group.
Unless the term does turn out to be commonly used or have some scientific support, it would be better omitted.
--JWB 18:58, 21 May 2005 (UTC)

message: Could we add a cite of a scientific paper or book using the word "Midean", or pull the word completely? Thanks! --JWB 04:11, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Midean

message: This appears to be  simply eurocentrism and I want some proof of this.  No links, no books or cites, no evidence.  Not even in the dictionary.  This has been clearly made up by a few people who are upset here.  I want links that explain how these people are European and how they are caucasoid and what makes them extra.  Otherwise the next thing we know the afrocentrist will come here and claim everyone is black or extra african negroid and we will have more silly edit wars.  Do people really want this for things that both sides know don't exist
:"Extra" means "outside". "Extra-European" in this case means "in places other than Europe". It does not mean "more European".
:I was the one complaining in the lengthy earlier discussion about possible eurocentrism and possible insufficient established usage. However the article now is largely about discussing the possible eurocentrism of the concept, and I did find usage of the concept in Cavalli-Sforza's book.
:POVs criticizing the concept may be incorporated in an article, but they do not justify revising the established definition of the concept, which is idiosyncratic usage and against Wikipedia policy.
:If you want to create or contribute to a page about some theory that whoever is black, go ahead. It will be judged on the same Wikipedia policy criteria of whether it is documenting a concept that is or has been in established use, not whether the concept is good or not; there are lots of articles documenting ideas that nobody has believed for centuries, like Flat Earth. --JWB 23:53, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Refer to Cavalli-Sforza's "The History and Geography of Human Genes", pages 77-79 for the definition. --JWB 04:25, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is silly
Talk:Bobby Hackett

message: Bobby Hackett was such a "nice man" that he found it virtually impossible to say anything bad - about anyone at all. There is a story that, on one occasion, he was asked his opinion about Adolf Hitler.
: "He was the best in his field."
came the reply.
81.102.133.198 16:24, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why is this even relevant? U21980 (talk) 17:51, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "He couldn't say anything bad about anyone" 

message: Why is there a huge box devoted to Glenn Miller at the end of the article?  Not to be "anti Glenn Miller" but this article is about Bobby Hackett.173.175.113.173 (talk) 18:45, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Glenn Miller

message: I just have to ask: Why are people edit-warring regarding information that they do not seem to want to cite? The only way we can solve the multiple issues on this page is to add citations. U21980 (talk) 17:53, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: They were neighbors of mine in Jackson Heights, Queens during the late '50s and the '60s.Kostaki mou (talk) 18:41, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The couple lived between Greenwich Village, Manhattan and Los Angeles, California while spending their summers in Chatham, Massachusetts."