lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Spyker F1

message: Please note that until this team's requested name change is retified by the FIA, its Formula One entry remains "Spyker F1". Please do not change the team name or move the page until confirmation of the name revision is forthcoming from the FIA officially. Pyrope 14:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article shouldn't be moved anyway, since this article is about the F1 team that took part in 2007, not about the F1 team that will/might take part in 2008. Jordan Grand Prix wasn't moved to Midland F1 Racing, Midland F1 Racing wasn't moved to Spyker F1, and Spyker F1 shouldn't be moved to whatever the name of the new team will be. AecisBrievenbus 18:25, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name questions again... 
Talk:Hotel (Hailey novel)

message: There are other, deeper, darker secrets that aren't fit to reveal to a family audience.  Are we in fact assuming a family audience here on Wikipedia?  12.45.255.66 (talk) 14:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family Audience 

message: This article is very poorly written. Disorganized, bad grammar -- like a middle schooler's essay in English class. And the article is much too long and detailed. 
I would re-write it, but my experience is that when you replace someone else's pet article on WP, they usually end up putting their version back.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bus114 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very poorly written article 

message: I replaced the multiple issues template on the article page with the unreferenced template to stop attracting copy editors.  There is no point editing unreferenced prose, which might disappear, be altered or never referenced.  This article needs to be either deleted or have citations added before a copy edit is going to be useful.  Regards Peter S Strempel | Talk  10:52, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit notes

message: ...when the book was read in galleys three studios big on the movie rights and it was sold to Warner Bros... 
:Someone has obviously edited this down. Can we restore? Valetude (talk) 12:30, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scrambled sentence
Talk:Watashi no Ashinaga Ojisan

message: Mainly grammar issues - I think this was translated from Japanese, it's a very awkward read. Ninja neko 14:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CopyEdit 

message: Merged Judie Abott with My Daddy Long Legs.  Redirected Judie Abott to My Daddy Long Legs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Drakesketchit (talk • contribs) 14:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Air conditioning

message: — Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture

message: The redirect Climatized has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 22:05, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Climatized]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Should we nowadays simply define it as a one way air to air heat pump which only pumps heat out of a building? Chidgk1 (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A reversal cycle air conditioner can also pump heat into a builder (ie heats the inside). Larger air conditioning system can also dehumidify the air. Dehumidifier also common in car air conditioners when defrosting the front window.  Stepho  talk  20:39, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So a reversal cycle air conditioner is the same as an air to air heat pump? And do air conditioners dehumidify the air differently to heat pumps? Chidgk1 (talk) 18:51, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of “air conditioner”? 

message: The 6000 year old city of Tell Hamoukar had double walled living quarters to encourage air flow. This is the oldest known air conditioning system. I think we could rewrite the history section. 
Source
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/airconditioning-found-at-oldest-city-in-the-world-5370557.html
Whatsupkarren (talk) 22:00, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tell Hamoukar
Talk:Honda in Formula One

message: Reads quite well, but rather brief and focussed on recent history. Almsot no references. IMHO. :) 4u1e 18:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: B-Class

message: The infobox says 81, the results table indicates 72, FORIX says 70. Which (if any) is correct? DH85868993 02:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Infobox changed to 88, which agrees with results table, FORIX and ChicaneF1. DH85868993 (talk) 02:59, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of races 

message: the article says 
"Pole Positions
1968 Italian Grand Prix (John Surtees) 
2006 Australian Grand Prix (Jenson Button)" if i remember correctly Button was on Pole once in Canada and in San Marino too. Loosmark (talk) 09:53, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: i checked that was.. BAR-Honda not Honda Loosmark (talk) 10:58, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pole positions 

message: I’ve recently added cleanup templates to the McLaren (2015–) section of this article and wanted to explain why I’ve done this and maybe enlist some help in cleaning it up.
The other sections in this article appear well written, with a balanced amount of technical detail and overview. However, this section lacks such detail and has become difficult to read due to having an excessive amount of examples that are not adding any weight to the main article.
It is quite clear that Honda have had numerous problems with its engines since 2015, but do we really need one hundred examples of this? An engine failure in a Free Practice session or Qualifying session doesn’t add anything useful to an article summarising Honda’s history in Formula One. The same applies to excessive quotes from the team or drivers. Quotes can be very informative, but a couple of examples of quotes from the team or drivers should suffice.
The tone and sheer amount of excessive detail in this section makes it very hard to read. In fact, it now reads more like a rolling news site/blog than an encyclopedia article and appears somewhat biased, even though Honda have had numerous problems. I think it’s very important to show that Honda have had various issues with its engines post 2015, but it should be written in a way that summarises these events in a neutral tone, along with other relevant information.
I have started drafting some improvements and aim to start making some edits to the article soon. In the meantime, if anyone has any thoughts they’d like to add, feel free to comment.
Thanks,
--LlamaBear (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup of McLaren (2015–) section
Talk:Cyclone Tessi

message: Does this article look big enough and well detailed to not be suggested to be merged back in the Cyclone season article, i put a fair bit of time and effort on this one. -- Gertzy 1st October 2006.
:The article looks nice, but if I were you, try to get as much info as possible. From what I have seen around, articles of this length do get merged. RaNdOm26 17:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll put it at a start for now, but I think you need to do this to get it to B-class. Make the storm history into 2 or 3 paragraphs, turn that table of yours into sentences, remove the town headers in the impact sections so it's just one big section, and make each town a paragraph, metrication, and finally, you need references using inline sourcing. If you don't know what that is, you do this; for starters, just do http://www.awebsite.com. When you get better at it, you can use  and  and  and all those other cool things, you might even be able to pass GA if you do this stuff. Good luck! íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 11:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Citations, better tone, proper capitalisation, WP:MOSDATE, etc. This is a stub, not a start. Too short. – Chacor 06:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Critism

message: There isn't enough info to justify the existence of this article. It is also not notable enough, did little damage, and caused no deaths. Merge. – Chacor 06:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Article has been merged since there isn't a whole lot here that's not in the season article. If more information can be found, add it there, and if a significant amount of information gets found, feel free to recreate. --Coredesat (talk) 07:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Alpha and Omega

message: The image at the top of the article uses "Αω" rather than the more popular "ΑΩ", or the more original "αω" (as the earliest text fragments are in miniscule). As I am planning on making an SVG version of this, I wondering if there was a reason for this.
— trlkly 11:46, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't particularly like the present version  either, mostly because these letters are taken from modern Roman-style print fonts, and the scaled-up lowercase "ω" just doesn't match the uppercase "Α" stylistically. The person who made it was probably motivated by the thought that early uncial realizations (compare the 4th-century fresco in the image further down) often had ω-like glyphs, but then the A-glyph should also be stylistically different (approximately ). I don't really care much which style we use, as long as it's interally consistent, so as far as I'm concerned feel free to create any new version you prefer. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:03, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I'm so late on getting back to this. Based on what you say, I'd guess that the originals are too obscure to be used as the main identifying image of the article, so I will be using the more popular "ΑΩ" version. People can see the original iconography in the subsequent images. However, before I start, does anyone have any ideas for which font would look the best? — trlkly 22:57, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: On Wikipedia, we have only limited control over the fonts used by the various different browsers on various different systems... AnonMoos (talk) 02:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think trlkly was speaking of using some font for creating a graphic. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Alpha and Omega from different alphabets 

message: The following section was copied verbatim from the Catholic Encyclopedia Hassett, Maurice. "Alpha and Omega (in Scripture)." The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. New York: Robert Appleton Company, 1907. (http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/01332a.htm) without attribution.  The writing and citations given are out of context and therefore nonsensical. I removed it from the article as being too confusing and not adding to the topic.141.166.137.146 (talk) 22:17, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blatantly copied section without attribution and with unclear cross references 

message: I tried looking for Pierre Teilhard de Chardin (I was struggling with the spelling /tei:a/) and I ended up here first. I think it might be worth adding a See Also to Omega Point (Pierre Teilhard de Chardin). I didn't as this is not my area and I know religious articles are wiki war zones, so I am just suggesting. --Squidonius (talk) 21:47, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A link is on Omega (disambiguation), which is a more natural place for it.  In the writing of southern French languages, "h" after a consonant letter means palatalization -- "nh" is [ɲ], "lh" was originally [ʎ] ([j] when adapted to standard French)... AnonMoos (talk) 02:32, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pierre Teilhard de Chardin
Talk:Monferno

message: This page certainly needs to be cleaned up.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.231.164.59 (talk) 16:26, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Wait, weren't these names actually released by Nintendo?  I've been so busy reverting the name changes all over, I hadn't noticed I'd done it to these pages too, with the starters.  Please, change them back to what they should be, if they do have proper attributions, but make sure it's referenced.  I won't change it again, myself, at least on this page. -JC 12:09, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they weren't.  They were leaked. -Jeske (v^_^v) 17:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  http://www.pokemonelite2000.com/n07_0319_dpcard005lg.jpg  Here's your source for its name.  Look closely at what it evolves from. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Feats-O-Strength (talk • contribs) 00:13, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  English name...
Talk:Trapp Family Story

message: I noticed that マリア・クッチャラ is used for her name over at https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%88%E3%83%A9%E3%83%83%E3%83%97%E4%B8%80%E5%AE%B6%E7%89%A9%E8%AA%9E
These hiragana apparently roughly sound like "Maria Cucciara" or "Maria Kutchara" or something along those lines.
Doesn't sound like "von Trapp". Also she's included in a section separate from トラップ一家 (Trapp family)
Maria von Trapp says she was born "Maria Augusta Kutschera". I searched googlebooks' The Story of the Trapp Family Singers for "Kutschera" but didn't get a hit. Did she ever use her birth surname in the memoir? Perhaps spelled differently? Ranze (talk) 11:06, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: surname of Maria
Talk:Disney Channel's Hauntober Fest

message: I just started this article and im adding info i just havent saved it yet gosh!dont delete it!
:Write the info before saving an article, or place the wip tag in it while you work on it (and remove it afterwards). Empty articles will be removed on sight! Nehwyn 16:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: so they is no halloween movie on disney this year whats up with that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.101.159.224 (talk) 19:04, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  no halloween movie this year. 

message: I noticed Hocus Pocus isn't on Disney Channel anymore as of December 27,2007 the movie premiered on ABC Family and is currently part of 13 Nights of Halloween Matthew Cantrell (talk) 12:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 & 2008
Talk:Sterling Hayden

message: Sterling Hayden was a great writer. His autobiography is a vivid and riveting pastiche that moves forward & backward in time: much like  film. What a life!!.  Besides being a first class sailor he was an avid readerer of Novels, nonfiction & philosophy; books with substance which made him feel like an outsider whether he was at sea or in Hollywood. So in a sense, he was "at sea" much of his life. As a writer he "found his voice" relatively late in life. Also , between the lines, it is pretty clear that he drank too much. WANDERER is both brutally frank & vulnerably candid. Both WANDERER & VOYAGE are very "gritty".  VOYAGE: A NOVEL OF  1896  is a long, rich, vivid  multi-themed epic with vividly realized characters, powerfully constructed  multiple plots full of brooding ruminations about capitalism vs socialism; & rugged invididuality vs team work,  the decadence of material surfit & the tragedy of abject poverty; the working conditions of 19th c sailors & the struggles of teh labor movement. PLUS the war bewteen the sexes in 1896: & all this between the lines of a wallopping page turner that is totally true to its period detail. It has at least 12 major characters & a host of lesser ones ALL FULLY REALIZED. I read it & immmediately though "Thomas Hardy does Existentialism".  It would make a GREAT FILM, but to do it justice it would have to be as long as LORD OF THE RINGS,with the same monumental attention to detail. I wonder who has the film rights.
:I agree.  Thanks to Wikipedia for making an article like this possible.  This article is really well done, especially with the quotes and cites to "Wanderer" and other sources.  Hayden would be proud to be remembered as the great writer he certainly was.  Judging by the fact that both his books are still in print, his writing has a lot of fans.  I hope someone will add something more about "Voyage."   McTeague 04:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ummm... OK... So why don't you write a Wiki article(s) on his books? That way people might become enticed to read them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.247.0.254 (talk) 19:47, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hayden the writer

message: are there guidelines for when this should & shouldn't be done? Dingsuntil (talk) 00:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  why separate filmography article? 

message: On the AHC show "what history forgot" they claimed that he was also a frogman in WWII.108.28.23.254 (talk) 15:30, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frogman?
Talk:Stall

message: Removed redirect (was #REDIRECT Talk:Stall (flight) ) --RobBrisbane 02:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What about Stall (Computing) - similar meaning to Hang / Freeze. The program / operating looks like it is still doing something, but is not, and will not respond to user commands.
--RobBrisbane 02:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stall (Computing) 

message: What about the stall rpm of an automatic car transmission?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.170.232 (talk) 14:08, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stall (Automatic Transmission)
Category talk:Historic maps of the Roman Empire

message: With existing categories :Category:Historical maps and :Category:Maps of the Roman Empire this one is superfluous. --Wetman 16:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The category Historical maps was no longer in use and is replaced by the :Category:History maps, which is intended for maps about teh history of. These kind of maps belong in the category old maps and its subcategories. Electionworld Talk? 17:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Romeo and the Black Brothers

message: "Romeo's Blue Skies" is the literal translation of the Japanese title, the official English name given by Nippon Animation is "Romeo and the Black Brothers"- well shouldn't that be the title WP uses- I seek guidance.--ClemRutter (talk) 20:01, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is it mentioned that it is written by Kurt Held if he and his wife both contributed to the work according to wikipedia page of the novel itself?
193.41.77.122 (talk) 18:17, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Actual author
Talk:Golden Age of Radio/Archive 1

message: Some duplication here and Radio programming.  Perhaps should be consolodated?
Also, that table makes adding new information awkward. Change to simple lists?
:There is some duplication but from what I can see that's because the Radio programming article needs to be significantly expanded.  There is plenty of 'programming' for radio to the present day worldwide, including music, talk radio and fictional audio storytelling.Markeer 17:46, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Isn't this article title biased heavily towards the United States? Hiding  talk 14:24, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  bias 

message: There is another page in the wikipedia which is a List of U.S. radio programs. It of course lists some shows not mentioned here.  I'm wondering whether the redundancy of the lists should continue to exist, and/or whether the listings should be separated which reference to the other page, and if so how such a separation should be made.  Badbilltucker 13:16, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just added a link to that list under "see also." Note that one is a list of vintage programs only. The other is a list that includes modern radio shows. Pepso 15:59, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listings Here and on American Radio Show page
Talk:2006–07 Serbian SuperLiga

message: I've started with adding some sections to fill in, and I'm renaming article to follow patterns established by FA Premier League 2006-07 article. // Laughing Man 16:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Divination by Astrological and Meteorological Phenomena

message: Name of the "book" in Chinese should be "馬王堆漢墓帛書". It is the first "book" drawing with the shapes of 29 comets. It was discovered in Mawangdui.
There is already an article talking about that: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Han_Dynasty_silk_comet_atlas
http://nucpwn.freehostia.com/%284%29Lost%20Temple%20insane.scx
:According to the official website of Hunan Provincial Museum , its name should be Divination by Astrological and Meteorological Phenomena (Tian Wen Qi Xiang Za Zhan, 天文氣象雜占).--Onlim (talk) 06:40, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Graphics software

message: What about merging this article with Graphics program ? --Xylometazolin 16:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: Yes, these articles needs to be merged. I guess merge Graphics progam into graphics software is best. -- Frap 12:34, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Graphics Software would be the correct terminology, it should be merged into Graphics software not into Graphics Program. --Hm2k 00:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article doesn't appear on any navigation templates. Nor does graphics or graphic art software.  Is this an indication of lack of use in the real world.  Or just an lack of attention by editors?  Should a redirect be created to something instead? - Shiftchange (talk) 00:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article 

message: What is graphics software 2409:4043:4C91:1F09:4D41:7F40:E934:33F2 (talk) 13:13, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computer graphics 

message: There is an unnecessary amount of article dedicated to advertising Adobe products. 2001:56A:F5D6:FF00:D5F2:A87:873A:C92C (talk) 07:59, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adobe
Talk:Care Bears: Oopsy Does It!

message: I know he didn't have one at the start but surely he did get one near the end of the book/movie?  And yes, I'm NOT calling it a friggin' "belly badge"; deal with it. :P76.177.190.137 01:40, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What did Oopsy's tummy symbol end up being?

message: Why I've never been so insulted in all my life!  They have always been known as tummy symbols; why should they now change to the tacky sounding "belly badges"? :P76.177.174.82 13:01, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please please PLEASE tell me they dropped that stupid "belly badges" name.  I'm about tempted to boycott this movie if they persist in using "belly badges". :(76.177.174.82 08:24, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tummy symbols are now ''belly badges''!?

message: I have heard that the new CBS show will be in the same style as this movie—and worse still, in CGI. --Slgrandson (page - messages - contribs) 21:02, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New show also CGI?! 

message: This page gives a really good review of one's experiences watching Oopsy on the big screen. Unfortunately, WP is normally against adding links from blogs and the like, such as this one. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 18:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice link, but... 

message: Half of the 'cast' you have listed for this page is incorrect as they never spoke in the movie. The Credits at the end of the movie also clearly only show 7 Voice actors which also reinforces the fact that some of the cast you have listed is incorrect! For a correct cast listing you can check out http://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/movies/Care-Bears-Oopsy-Does-It/side-by-side/
Optimussolo (talk) 16:49, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Incorrect Cast Info