lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dolores LaChapelle

message: The primary author, User:Catherine Jo Morgan, seems to be absent.  The only other substantive addition was a sentence and a half by User:Seattle Skier.  No references other than to Ms. LaChapelle's are given.  There aren't a great many that turn up in a simple search -- multiple, independent sources seem to be lacking.  If no one else is able to add to the article in three years time, it doesn't seem like it'll ever meet WP:BIO.  66.25.169.151 (talk) 08:06, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Plenty of independent reliable sources turn up in a Google Books search. I'm contesting the proposed deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:10, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

text: I've added some sources to the article. I hope that that's enough to demonstrate that the subject was notable for more than being an appendage to her husband. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:01, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  prod 

message: I don't question Dolores's notability, but wonder whether it's correct to categorize her as an "American ecologist." If that designation implies a scientist whose research is in the academic field, perhaps Dolores should be noted here as an author, philosopher, scholar, etc. instead. I tried a search on Google Scholar, and many books and articles came up, but none would be classed as "ecological" in the academic sense, I think. --Araucana (talk) 17:36, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ecologist? 
Talk:Marooned (Red Dwarf)

message: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:
1. Referencing and citation: pass 
2. Coverage and accuracy: pass 
3. Structure: pass
4. Grammar: pass 
5. Supporting materials: pass 
Nreive (talk) 15:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: at around the 17 minute mark where he's burning the books - he burns a book called "lalita" (or lalite/lalitte) but saves "page 61". I have searched and can not find any existence of this book, even though all the rest are considered historically notable "classics" (ie Shakespeare). There are also heavy implications that the book is French. --Fresh Start (talk) 08:23, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this book exist 
Talk:Gylfaginning

message: How the word norse word Ginning has come to be translated to tricking is not convincing. Ginn rather seems to mean power in terms of effective. The Norwegian word for power, 'makt' derives from old 'megin'. The etymology of engine seems related (according to etymonline.com). Because there is a sense of 'a making' it seems plausible that the notion  of ginning as trickery has evolved. But what has to be recalled in the context of Gylfaginning is that the story of Gylve is the story of the first king of the lands of the Svea people (Svitjod), referring not merely to modern Sweden, but in Snorri's world also comprising big Sweden which included large parts of Russia (Store Svitjod). It is a story about how the Æsa-religion was imported to the Nordic countries from the east. This theory I find confirmed by Alvíssmál where there is a mention of Ginnregin who rather should be regarded as the crafty ones, than the tricksters. I'm arguing that Gylfaginning rather should be translated the Gylfe's empowerment. As a native speaker of Norwegian, and well aquainted with Swedish, having some understanding of Icelandic and old Norse, I'm compelled to correct the blunt statement in the article per date. Both in contemporary Norwegian and Swedish the verb 'å gynne'/'at gynna' exist. It is the act of making a favour, making something better, benefitting. --Xact (talk) 20:01, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I recommend acquainting yourself with WP:NOR.--94.155.68.202 (talk) 05:08, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Also, 'gynne/gynna' is not an inherited Norse word, but a Low German loan composed of the prefix 'gi/ge-' and the cognate of the verb 'unne/unna' (http://runeberg.org/svetym/0300.html), so it has nothing to do with 'ginning'; not to mention that it should have been 'gynning' if there were a connection.--94.155.68.202 (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Ginning
Talk:Donald Antrim

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates and tables for short stories, poems and/or book reviews. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:12, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Talk:Donald Davie

message: Is it permitted by copyright to enter a sample poem or two here? I know a couple of Donald Davie's poems but I will not enter them if they are just going be deleted. SmokeyTheCat 09:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the poem from the page because, as you were concerned, copyright poses a problem here. A complete poem just placed there with no context does not really fall under fair usage. A few lines from a poem to illustrate a point (such as highlighting a particular style the author uses) adds to the article and can comfortably be considered fair use, whereas a large block of text used merely as ornamentation or to bulk up the article cannot. ~Matticus TC 09:18, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  That seems a bit unfair after I went to all the effort of typing it in. In Philip Larkin's entry there are links to several of his complete poems. Why is there an copyright issue giving a link to a complete poem but not entering one directly here? That doesn't make any sense.SmokeyTheCat 10:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Links to complete poems on external sites are generally fine (if that site is violating copyright, then that's their issue and not Wikipedia's), but content within Wikipedia articles themselves has to fall under the GNU Free Documentation License, free to be copied and redistributed by anyone (provided they credit the originating source correctly). This makes dropping large chunks of copyrighted material into articles problematic - if anyone can copy articles freely, that means the author's work is being distributed freely, regardless of their wishes and rights. Extracts of copyrighted material must be kept to the minimum required to get the point across within the article, and never be used gratuitously. There's no clear line where something crosses from fair use to infringement, but generally a few lines from a particular song/poem/book/whatever is considered acceptable (provided they have relevance to the article, of course). I do know that wholesale dumping of copyrighted song lyrics into articles is a definate no-no, so similar rules apply to copyrighted poetry. I know copyrights and fair use are complicated areas, but they cannot be ignored, especially in a project on this scale and visibility.  I know it's frustrating that your work gets undone, but as it says at the bottom of every edit window, "Content that violates any copyright will be deleted" - if I hadn't removed it, someone else would doubtless have spotted it eventually and done the same. I don't pretend to be an expert on copyright and fair use myself, but I do know enough to get by on Wikipedia. If you have any more questions, don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page and I'll do what I can to answer. ~Matticus TC 16:33, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Okay fair enough Matticus. Your point is well made. I have posted the poem elsewhere and given a link. I may post some more as I think Davie is an under-rated poet and not well enough known.SmokeyTheCat 14:04, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sample Poem
Talk:Donald H. Tuck

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Donald H. Tuck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426025350/http://www.locusmag.com:80/SFAwards/Db/NomLit137.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/NomLit137.html#5276
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120514230513/http://locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/Bigheart.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/Bigheart.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426025350/http://www.locusmag.com:80/SFAwards/Db/NomLit137.html to http://www.locusmag.com/SFAwards/Db/NomLit137.html#5276
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
 Perry Middlemiss (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:S. S. Millard

message: What was his felony charge? What was he incarcerated for? -Unknown  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.110.28.146 (talk) 18:57, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Referenced criminal record

message: The 1920s film titled Sex that Millard made is not the same as the Pathé Exchange film Sex (1920) starring Louise Glaum (so don't link it). Likely he chose the same title to confuse potential viewers. Deanlaw (talk) 23:11, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: 1920s film titled ''Sex'' not the same film as ''Sex'' (1920)
Talk:Newton Abbot railway station

message: Paignton is still served by two XC train to Paignton AM and PM. The AM train returns to Bristol Temple Meads; the PM train goes to Birmingham New Street as it has always done REVUpminster (talk) 09:36, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect it might have been withdrawn temporarily due to COVID-19 but it is certainly running today - I've checked on RealTime Trains. This same edit has been made on multiple articles but I think I've reverted them all now. Geof Sheppard (talk) 16:19, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  XC services
Talk:Canford Cliffs

message: Shouldn't the "banking controversey" section be in the HSBC Bank (Europe) article? -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:29, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  move 
Talk:Reginald H. Thomson

message: Did You Know that R H Thomson's PhD was honorary, and awarded to him in 1901, the same year he received his Master's degree from Hanover?  He says so in his autobiography.  If his bachelor's was in mathematics, his masters probably was also.  His honorary PhD?  I don't know yet, but I doubt it was in Philosophy.   --Kenatipo  speak! 22:17, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did you know? 

message: While city surveyor in 1885 and 1886, Thomson was in a civil engineering partnership with F. H. Whitworth. Whitworth was the county surveyor, a job that Thomson held from 1891 to 1892. They advertised in the Seattle P-I from at least May 1885 to February 186 and mentioned their public positions. See eg column 6 of May 2, 1885 Seattle P-I. Roket (talk) 14:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early career
Talk:Dorothy P. Lathrop

message: Lathrop won the inaugural, 1938 Caldecott Medal from the American Library Association, recognizing her illustration of the children's picture book Animals of the Bible.
Jim Vadeboncoeur Jr. (JVJ Publishing) hosts a transcript of her acceptance paper (or "acceptance speech", as he links it from the second paragraph of Illustrators: D. P. Lathrop, one of this article's External links). 
--P64 (talk) 21:37, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Caldecott Medal acceptance speech
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of East Anglia

message: Hello all. I am a parishoner of St. Etheldreda's at Ely, under Fr. Anthony Shryane.  I thought it prudent to add a liitle information to the article about Bishop Michael concerning his present medical condition.  I haven't made it to mass for some time, so the last update I got on his condition was around the start of February, so if anyone else in this area knows of Bishop Michael's illness and has further updates, please add to the article or here.  Thanks Thor Malmjursson 18:13, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you possibly find some sources for the statments you've added (not that I doubt they are true).  See WP:CITE, a press release from the Diocesan wbsite would be sufficient to be going on with, though third-party media reports would probably be better.  David Underdown 09:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

text: No probelm, I've reformatted the information slightly soit meets the usual standards.  Thinking about it, it might be better to remove (virtually) all the content about Bishops from this article, and place it in Bishop of East Anglia, since it relates more to the holders of that office, rather than the Diocese as a whole.  What do you think?  David Underdown 13:18, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bishop Michael / Illness
Talk:Alison Maclean

message: I took a look at your article and overall, I think you did a great job when it came to contributing content to Maclean's career section. No sections are excessive and I feel you did a good job of summarizing the person's work without adding too many details. The one exception to this may be when you mention their film and then a further sentence and details about the many actors that starred in it. A specific example of this was when writing about Jesus' Son. Still, the many films you mentioned and their accompanying information provide insight into the person's work even if there is not a separate Wikipedia page to mention such knowledge which is helpful. The only other suggestion I have is to potentially organize your article's career section better. This could be by film or even easier, by year with sub-headings so you can still speak on all of the person's career events during a period without seeming like you are jumping from film to film. I linked a couple of the locations that were mentioned throughout the article and once again wanted to say great effort on this page! 
Wikistellar96 (talk) 00:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review  

message: Not sure if we were supposed to put the peer reviews here so I guess I'll just take a moment to summarize my thoughts here as well. The added charts look great. The information in the career section is a bit overpowering, and redundant (because there are already articles about the films). On the other hand, all the links are great and work and the information about her awards is important. So overall, great job! Your article looks great. Donut12345 (talk) 20:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:Skuldelev ships

message: Skuldelev 2 is described as a ship of a skeid type. However, clicking on skeid opens a link describing skeid football.
regards 
txi
:Hi. Just here to tell that the problem has been solved. Not by me, but someone fixed it some time ago apparently. There is now a section on "Skeid" ships on the Longship article. RhinoMind (talk) 00:14, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fastway (band)

message: Did these guys have any hits? I don't see any songs listed in the article. -Freekee 15:51, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hit songs? 
Talk:Douglas Groothuis

message: There does not seem to be a category for critics of the New Age. Thoughtmonkey (talk) 04:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories? 
Talk:Íslendingabók

message: I have just realized that in September someone created a redirect to this page from the formerly redlinked Kristni saga. This is incorrect; Íslendingabók draws on Kristni saga and continues its story (much as it draws on and continues Landnámabók), but it isn't the same text, nor does it include Kristni saga. This may have been a misunderstanding of the title of the edition published by the Viking Society for Northern Research the pdf of which is listed as an external link here, but examination of that pdf will make clear that they are two different texts that are simply both included in the book. Other than that listing, Kristni saga isn't even mentioned in this article. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:07, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kristni saga
Talk:Alvin H. Perlmutter

message: one old creature to anther. 47.147.242.82 (talk) 19:44, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syracuse and beyond. Hi Al, it's Bob Klein, still kicking and remembering the old days at WAER. I've lived in LA since '54, rn my own company for decades. Was on the Newhouse Biard for a dozen years. Just wanted to say hi from one survivor to another.
Talk:Grímnismál

message: Hi Bloodofox,
You deleted the reference to this site, calling it a non-scholarly site with an agenda.
http://www.germanicmythology.com/PoeticEdda/Grimnismal.html
What agenda does this site have? It has scans of the two main manuscripts of the poem, all of the available English translations, and a sampling of scholarship. The page is billed as a study guide to the poem. It isn't pushing any agenda as far as I can tell. 
All of the external links are to "non-scholarly sites". Why is this one an exception? Jack the Giant-Killer (talk) 02:24, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Outside of this site being a simple collection of links to widely available public domain translations (which we can simply site from reputable sources), it also contains original pro-Rydbergian material () and various other unpublished personal essays. The site is an unacceptable reference and linking to it here equates to little more than advertisement. If there are problems with the other links, then they also need to go. :bloodofox: (talk) 11:08, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Skálholt

message: Stefánsson is called both Sigurd and Sigurdur in the article. Varlaam (talk) 22:52, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sigurd(ur) 
Talk:Anand–Milind

message: The tone of the introductory paragraph needs to be changed, as it is not NPOV. Also, a complete listing of the movies is not necessary, or at the least needs to be more organized. This article would probably need to be completely rewritten. Also, the article title may not be the most appropriate; however the two are best known, the article title should reflect it. Consider moving it to a more appropriate page, or possibly two separate pages as necessay (See WP:RM for help). This article needs some serious reworking. --V2Blast (talk) 22:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavy reworking needed 

message: Why such a short page of one of the Successful Music Composers of 90s Bollywood AIL601 (talk) 15:00, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very short page
Talk:Montero, Bolivia

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Snow move for 1st. A new request can be made later if someone wants to make the song primary but as noted the album will probably prevent that anyway.(non-admin closure)  Crouch, Swale (talk)  16:48, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *Just created a dab page – there's more than we thought (like a district in Peru). The safest bet for the time being is to move the disambiguation page to the basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 02:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

text: *Support alternative proposal - recentism is a likely case in this circumstance that I had failed to consider, but beyond that I was unaware of the existence of a disambiguation page, as it was not linked as of the time of the discussion's creation. Builder018 (talk) 03:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *The reason you didn't find the dab page before is that I made one after the requested move started! Also, given that Lil Nas X's upcoming album will ALSO be titled Montero, I'd fully expect there to be even LESS of a primary topic once it's released. The safest bet is 100% to have the dab page at the basename. Paintspot Infez (talk) 18:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

text: *If/when pageviews calm down, maybe landing at the dab page would be best, but Montero (Call Me by Your Name) got 30k hits today.  I'm still thinking Montero as a primary redirect is justified. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 03:36, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, he confirmed this five days ago (link). Good catch. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 06:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

text: *Support Speedy Move as uncontroversial, given the high traffic of the involved pages. Builder018 (talk) 23:54, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

text: *The conversation has shifted to moving the dab page "Montero (disambiguation)" to "Montero", given the sheer number of topics on that disambiguation page. Would you support that? Paintspot Infez (talk) 14:42, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: *In that case I would support moving "Montero (disambiguation)" to "Montero" and "Montero" to "Montero, Bolivia". HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 15:01, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 April 2021
Talk:Anatole de Grunwald

message: :A 2006 article improperly sourced by IMDb from the "External links" as a general source. IMDb is considered unreliable per WP:RSPS, WP:RS/IMDB and WP:ELP. There is article content that is not in the source and the article has been tagged since June 2019. It is not unreasonable to expect sources when questioned. WP:NEXIST states:  
:The subject has an entry at the National Portrait Gallery and if other sources exist some need to be presented.  Otr500 (talk) 11:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues