Talk:Texe Marrs

message: Go ahead and tag it NPOV then. Be bold! Or rewrite it. Tex 18:07, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with being bold, but try fixing it first, then tag it if you must. Tom Harrison Talk 18:14, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That was careless of me! Of course you are correct. Tex 18:22, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV tag

message: Can anyone find the name of the Christian bestseller list that Dark Secrets of the New Age hit #1 on? Tim Long 04:46, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bestseller

message: This article was automatically  assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: May I ask what the "good reasons" are you mention in this diff ? Hooper (talk) 14:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would still love an answer to this question. Hooper (talk) 15:14, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is poorly written, however there seems to be an attempt to sanitize the article (i.e. hide Marrs' anti-semitism) by RucasHost. Biblewarrior3 (talk) 02:07, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mass Changes

message: The article should maybe provide additional information about Marrs' book Codex Magica, which goes to great lenghts in trying to expose secret Masonic symbols that are thought to be disseminated throughout modern media. ADM (talk) 04:45, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Codex Magica

message: The third party sourcing for this article appears to consist of a couple of, not particularly prominent, Christian apologetics ministries/websites (which can usually be counted upon to dispute opposing views, no matter how obscure) and a blog (which therefore fails WP:BLP). I'm not seeing notability here. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 18:19, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third party sourcing 

message: Why were his books from 1989 to 2011 removed from the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.89.102.6 (talk) 04:28, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Because he is a nutbag. --201.215.149.25 (talk) 21:57, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Books

message: I would like to label Marrs a conspiracy theorist in the lead, but want to avoid being "tendentious" in my editing. Right now the lead just describes him as an opponent of Freemasonry, the Roman Catholic Church, and Judaism. He also believes in conspiracy theories, and that's at least as important a part of what he does. This article is already in the category conspiracy theorists on wikipedia. May I put material in the lead about Marrs being a conspiracy theorist? --PaulBustion88 (talk) 06:57, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The standard at Wikipedia is that you can label him anything you like, but only if you can support the allegation with reliable secondary or tertiary sources.  Ragity (talk) 22:59, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The label 'conspiracy theorist' is tendentious. But so are terms like 'antisemitic' etc.  If a group can get it right that people are resenting a label, then that is rather telling as well. If believing in 'conspiracy theories' is a criteria for calling someone a conspiracy-theorist, then this should be applied to any conspiracy theory not just selective ones. And since virtually anyone believes in some conspiracy theories, you can apply that label to anyone. And that means that it isn't really distinctive. 105.4.1.196 (talk) 19:24, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conspiracy Theorist label. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Texe Marrs. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060302001627/http://www.witchvox.com/va/dt_va.html?a=cabc&c=whs&id=4646 to http://www.witchvox.com/va/dt_va.html?a=cabc&c=whs&id=4646
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:06, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In this debate about the King James Bible, a person by the name of Tex Mar[r]s calls in between about 53:26 and 59:36 and defends the King James Bible in preference to all modern versions. Is it the Tex Marrs mentioned in the article, and if so, is it safe to say he is a King-James Onlyist?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.6.7.34 (talk) 03:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: KJVO?

message: I have separated books from videos.  Someone may want to group them together under one title, but it seemed awkward.  I don’t object, if someone wants to do that, but the vids should still be separated.  Also, Tyndale is an important publisher of Christian lit, named after an historic theologian, and there is no “s” in his name, nor in that of his namesake publisher.  Ragity (talk) 06:46, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Books <> videos