Talk:Bejeweled (video game)

message: Bejeweled is like tetris attack, not tetris. It shares few elements with tetris at all.
*Bejeweled is more simple than Panel de Pon/Tetris Attack though, it's kind of like...TA without moveing or something. Perhaps reword it to that effect, might help. Melodia Chaconne 12:53, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit:

message: I would like to add a link to a switch accessible version of bejeweled that my students developed. This version allows users who are severely motor impaired to play this game using one button only. I think it is relevant to be added as other popular games sometimes have a section that describes accessible versions  of this game.eelke (talk) 17:56, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accessible Version 

message: Bejeweled 2 Deluxe screens refer to "gems", and presumedly all versions of Bejeweled do. Also, the article links to gemstone. Why then does the article refer to "jewels"? Brian Jason Drake 07:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a simple mistake to me. AFter all, the game's name is Bejeweled, not Begemmed. — Frecklefoot | Talk 14:26, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure that the game refers to the objects as "gems" in all the games, so perhaps it should say gems instead of jewels to maintain consistency with the game itself? I'd rather double-check before I make any edits. - S. Komae (talk) 21:43, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I already changed all references to jewels to refer to gems in this edit, except for the one in the Twilight mode description, which was added later (I've just changed that one too). Brian Jason Drake 03:20, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewels? 

message: My understanding is these only exist in Bejeweled 2 Deluxe, and are specific to the original mode. The article is not clear on this point. Brian Jason Drake 03:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved the information to the "Hidden parts" section and expanded it a bit, but haven't confirmed it (I can confirm that high levels also trigger hidden modes - I've done it myself.). I removed the example of a hidden mode as these things are supposed to be hidden and it isn't really necessary (we don't give details on the visual effects either). Brian Jason Drake 11:55, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hidden modes 

message: I know that Zoo Keeper is a bit older than people realize. There was a PS1 release in japan as part of the SuperLite series, and maybe older versions than that. Also popcap are notorious thieves and Zuma is blatantly lifted Puzz Loop, which raises my suspicions even more. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Frogacuda (talk • contribs) 
:Be that as it may, unless you cite a source, you can't put such assertions in a Wikipedia article.  Doing so is WP:OR which is completely against Wikipedia policy.  You can mention that it's similar, but you can't accuse PopCap of "idea piracy" without citing a repudable source. It is entirely possible that they came up with a similar idea indpendently. — Frecklefoot | Talk 21:55, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering this myself.  There's this, Zoo Keeper/Zooo, Lunatix, probably many other clones whose names I forget.  But we equally can't claim that PopCap created it originally without a trustworthy source. -- Smjg (talk) 16:03, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zoo Keeper first? 

message: I just want to make this clear: using Wikipedia to advertise your pet project is prohibited.  An anon user keeps adding links to Linux Bejeweled clones.  Sorry, that's not an appropriate use of Wikipedia.  There are hundreds of clones of Bejeweled, what makes these so notable apart from the fact that this user likes them.  I am reverting them AGAIN.  If you have a problem with it, bring it up here. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 18:34, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising prohibited

message: Here's an article which could be a good reference about the development of Bejeweled from (or at least similarity to) earlier puzzle games:
http://www.jesperjuul.net/text/swapadjacent/
Logotu (talk) 17:36, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Article 

message: :Image:Ssc-bbf-3inarow.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the reason it is included in the aritcle is to give a visual reference example of a "match three" game aparently influenced by Bejeweled.  - Logotu (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 16:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Image:Bejeweled deluxe sc1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 1 June, 2010, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

text: I think the reason it is included in the aritcle is to give a visual reference example of a "match three" game aparently influenced by Bejeweled.  - Logotu (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 16:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ssc-bbf-3inarow.jpg

message: :Image:Bejeweled deluxe sc1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 1 June, 2010, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 12:00, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the reason it is included in the aritcle is to give a visual reference example of a "match three" game aparently influenced by Bejeweled.  - Logotu (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 16:45, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Bejeweled_deluxe_sc1.jpg

message: I have restored the History section of this article, which was deleted on 22 February 2008 by 64.8.161.251 without any explanation (looks like vandalism to me). If there was a good reason for the deletion, please discuss it here. Thanks. —Slowspace (talk) 23:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section restored 

message: I'm unsure of whether the history should be of this particular game, or the series of games.
For example: Bejeweled (this page) is basically a flash version of Jewelbox_(video_game) which was a port to the Mac of XJewel, which was a port to Xwindows of Domain/Jewelbox on Apollo computers, which was written around 1990 by Yoshihiro Satoh.  Ref: http://pwet.fr/man/linux/jeux/x/xjewel  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.61.135.243 (talk) 06:53, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Section may want update 

message: Hi. Last Tuesday, Facebook released the new version of Bejeweled Blitz with new features. The medals every 25k only go up to 250k, but it is now easier to score over 300k. Should we include this information in the article (some people have claimed to score as high as 22 million, but that's likely the result of cheating for most scores over 1 million)? Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 02:40, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe just a sentence mentioning the game, but a comprehensive discussion of the game is inappropriate. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 01:09, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe someone should make a seperate article for Blitz, since it now has several features even Bejeweled 2 lacks. Digifiend (talk) 11:08, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEW Bejeweled Blitz 

message: Can anyone think of a more accurate, yet equally concise way of describing the other two Bejeweled games?  The introductory paragraph refers to them as "sequels," yet this term specifically applies to games or movies that follow the original's story - something Bejeweled doesn't have.  How about "Two other games in the franchise..."151.203.201.50 (talk) 02:54, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sequel" 

message: I just deleted a section that was terribly written on the iPod Touch and iPhone version of the game. It read as following:
The Ipod Version
Mobile devices Ipod or Itouch played Bejeweled add-on. iPod Touch was a working title named iTouch.
I have no idea what that means. Please write a section on the iPhone/iPod touch if you can! Cliko (talk) 11:33, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  iPod Touch / iPhone 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bejeweled. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100612032438/http://www.popcap.com:80/faq/bejeweled/1033/pc/readme.html to http://popcap.com/faq/bejeweled/1033/pc/readme.html#C
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100612032438/http://www.popcap.com:80/faq/bejeweled/1033/pc/readme.html to http://popcap.com/faq/bejeweled/1033/pc/readme.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:11, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. More time is needed to determine if the game, despite long-term significance, is no longer the primary topic. (non-admin closure) Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 00:45, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Bejeweled →  – move to make way for new disambiguation page 2A02:C7F:2CE3:4700:F189:ACFF:8CF2:9515 (talk) 18:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 October 2022 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bejeweled (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 18:07, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress