lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Suspiria (disambiguation)

message: Hi there - someone took out my link to the Star Trek: Voyager episode Cold Fire from this page. I personally think it's valid - for ages I could remember that there was a Voyager episode with a "Suspiria" in it, but couldn't remember which one.  came to Wikipedia knowing that I would get a link to the film of the same name, but assumed the disambiguation page would contain the information. It did not, so I added it and now someone's taken it off again. I reckon it's a valid use of the page. Having just checked - I note that I'm not the first person to make this entry. I'm gonna put it on again. Speednik 14:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Disambig pages are not for listing all possible uses of a term, they're for disambiguating articles with titles that might be ambiguous. There is no article for the band or for the Star Trek creature, and it's very unlikely there ever will be one (the creature appears in only 1 episode of 1 series), so there is no risk of that. If you wanted to search for one of those, there is the search button or perhaps the directory function (Special:Allpages). You could also check a Star Trek-specific wiki for the information.--Cúchullain t/c 22:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Hey, I'm no one's boss. I just have an idea of what disambiguation pages are meant to be for, based on the the disambig guideline. Other than that I'm just another volunteer here.--Cúchullain t/c 22:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Femi Oguns

message: I have proposed that this article be deleted for the following reasons:
1. No real notability, as per details in deletion template - subject could not be considered to have had significant roles or enough roles in number (from experience in the Theatre world, the subject has predominantly the same number as thousands of young actors), nor a fan-base, nor made prolific or innovative contributions. I myself have a similar number of roles but would not consider myself notable by any stretch of the imagination!
2. The page seems to have suffered extensive and quite confusing edits/trolling. I wonder if it is worth battling over it?
3. As part of this strange series of edits, User:Femi Oguns appears not to wish to edit the page to increase the level of detail (such as on the background information template, add image). If the subject is not interested in the subject, then why would anyone else be?!
However, I am open to suggestions - especially from User:AlisonW, who appears to have taken a keen interest in the page if there is a more Wiki-friendly solution.
Leftblank (talk) 11:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion details 
Talk:Staverden

message: I'm pretty sure that there is SMALLER city in the czech republic - Rabštejn nad Střelou - http://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabštejn_nad_Střelou (no english page avaiable) with 25 inhabitants.
:I've removed the claim about being the smallest city in the world; I don't believe it either. Eugène van der Pijll 19:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:London School of Theology

message: I am concerned that the recent edits by Hi-Teach are verging on advertising again and seem to indicate a conflict of interest regarding this institution and the article.  There is no need to keep adding to the "academic reputation" section - especially when one person's opinions about this are being presented as the "truth".  Such editing isn't acceptable.  Afterwriting (talk) 15:21, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits on "academic reputation" 

message: I don't think it's proportionate to list all faculty. I've removed this twce but it's been reverted by the same IP - I commented on their talk page last time and am now bringing it her for the community. Tacyarg (talk) 22:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, there is no need for the list. Notable staff of course can be mentioned. DuncanHill (talk) 23:01, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full list of faculty 

message: The newly added section on the college's history is much too long compared to the overall article size. Further, it is nearly a cut-and-paste job from a book.  And that single book forms the only significant source for the section.  I propose significantly shortening it, perhaps a week or so from now (so mid-March 2019) unless there is majority consensus to preserve it all. Feline Hymnic (talk) 12:06, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. Done. Feline Hymnic (talk) 19:06, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section too long
Talk:W. Wesley McDonald

message: this article is intended to be a stub.  Due to time restraints and lack of sources I could not complete the full article, but will add to it later.
thanks,
adam q. stauffer
OK, but add his other work. It really takes more than just one book. I added an underconstruction tab. DGG (talk) 20:07, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Conjugate element (field theory)

message: I always thought that conjugacy in a field is defined by a function f(a) mapping the field onto itself such that f(a+b) = f(a)+ f(b) and f(a*b) = f(a)*f(b).
For real numbers, the f(a) = a is the only conjugacy, for complex numbers the complex conjugate is the only conjugacy besides f(a) = a, and in a Gallios field GF(p^n) the conjagacies are formed by putting the element to a power the prime p.
This article does not seem to mention this at all Karl 14:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If that’s what you always understood conjugacy to mean then from where did you source the definition? Just provide a reference and edit away! Tweet7 (talk) 21:23, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Old post
File talk:Ble-goude.gif

message: Right, Betacommandbot, or whomever has unleashed this on the world.  What's the deal with this image?
:image:Ble-goude.gif
You tag it for review, but the human behind you never bothers to show up with any reasons.  More specificity is added to the rationale, the tag is removed, and a week later, here we are again!  
Stated reason this time:
c) The name of each article in which fair use is claimed for the item, and a separate fair-use rationale for each use of the item, as explained at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. The rationale is presented in clear, plain language, and is relevant to each use.
Bloody christ, what do you call the link at the bottom of the page?
Look, I understand your desire to make wikipedia as small and nonspecific as possible.  Heck, I might even admire it in another time and another place.   But if you feel the need to auto delete images from wikipedia, please tell your creator that she/he has to actually visit and look at the images in question, and come up with some human readable demands which can be addressed by other humans.
Otherwise, your existance, dear Betacommandbot, is a massive pain in everyone's collective ass.
XOXO
14:35, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:179th Street Tunnel

message: Well, the articles were tagged with a merge proposal on November 15, two weeks as of my current writing, but no discussion has opened. I'm going to post this identical talk to the other talkpage, too.
The text on this article and the proposed merge article, 179th Street Tunnel is almost identical. The only real difference I can discern is a singular mention regarding the direction of traffic flow (eastbound on the 178th and westbound on the 179th).
Rather just than merging one into the other, and redir'ing, would there be a beneficial rename? Something like "The 178th and 179th Streets tunnels", altho that is a bit unwieldy. Yngvarr 17:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I replied on Talk:178th Street Tunnel. In short, I support the merge with the name 178th–179th Street tunnels. Marc Shepherd (talk) 20:16, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:BenQ

message: I wonder if "BenQ" has anything to do with the japanese word "benkyou" ("studying"). The spelling is the same. --84.59.26.15 (talk) 22:06, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have just modified one external link on BenQ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170405171647/http://proyektormalang.com/ to http://proyektormalang.com/
Hello fellow Wikipedians,112.196.25.5 (talk) 04:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Killdozer! (short story)

message: "Then, something falls from the sky, blasting the whole area below them, including the places the killdozer damaged and the graves of their fellow workers. One tears up the report he was writing and throws it in the air, thrilled that an explanation has been made for them."
It is clearly stated that what the men are building is a war-time (WWII) pacific island airstrip, and that what falls from the sky are bombs, presumably Japanese bombs. 70.17.36.243 (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it is clearly stated in the story that a secret experimental rocket crashes on the island, & destroys all traces of the conflict. This is an example of deus ex machina, bringing in a contrived solution to fix a problem in the plot, yet it works quite well here & is actually a masterful stroke. (The story has in effect end -- Sturgeon even draws his reader's attention to this fact -- yet how do these workmen explain to the authorities what happened in a way that does not land them in prison or a nut house for the rest of their lives? The government is faced with a mishap that they want to keep under wraps, the survivors have a mishap they want to keep under wraps -- both parties have good reasons to agree about what will be reported happened on the island.) -- llywrch (talk) 20:46, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  something falls from the sky
Talk:Chaintech

message: Chaintech manufactured a line of Book Size PCs in the 1980's and 1990s. They were truly the size of an average paperback novel. (A 1980's size paperback, most publishers have reduced the size a bit since.) The one I owned had an 80286 CPU and integrated TTL video switchable by jumpers among Hercules, CGA and EGA modes. It had a 1.44m floppy drive inside, used SIPP RAM modules and may have had room for a hard drive. Everything was packed extremely tight. The power supply was external, almost as big as the computer, connected via a DIN plug. They came with a special, extra narrow keyboard without number pad- connected via a standard connector. I don't recall if it was an AT or PS/2 connector.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzybody (talk • contribs) 07:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Book Size PC line
Talk:Kinship (TV series)

message: The criticism section sounds extremely bias and most of the information is very opinionated.  Viewer comments from internet forums should not be cited as references.  How did the figure 90% appear when there is no definite measure to determinte the percentage of screentime.  Although many people think that acting was bad, a few actors received star award nominations.  This section should be heavily revamped.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mingshu (talk • contribs) 07:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 
Talk:Mongol Nation

message: Hmmmm, I was expecting information about the biker gang refered to in this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Under-Alone-Undercover-Infiltrated-Motorcycle/dp/0812969529/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-7966733-7594345?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1194275507&sr=8-1
198.6.46.11 15:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So instead, you actually learned something about history. Congrats. --Latebird 16:02, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yay history!! (no sarcasm, I'm being sincere) 198.6.46.11 (talk) 17:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  By the way, the page I was looking for is here in case anyone else has the same problem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongols_%28motorcycle_club%29  198.6.46.11 (talk) 17:09, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The biker gang?
Talk:Les Parrott

message: insufficient importance for a separate article  DGG ( talk ) 05:48, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Saving Your Marriage Before It Starts]] into [[Les Parrott]]
Talk:Ain't Never Gonna Give You Up

message: :
What's remarkable about "only once"?  How many songs have been performed more than once on the same show?  (Carol Burnett's closing song comes to mind.)  If this was her only public performance of the song, that could be made more explicit. —Tamfang (talk) 17:47, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  only once
Talk:Colonel Future

message: I know nothing about this subject, so I cannot authoritatively correct it, but I was glancing at this page and noticed that the name of Col. Future II is spelled as "Edmund" and "Edmond" at least one time each.  I doubt they are both correct, so I challenge someone more knowledgeable to fix it.  :)
waj (talk) 20:15, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name inconsistency
Template talk:British ice hockey

message: The use of flags on this template was discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Navboxes. Flibirigit (talk) 19:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag

message: Shouldn't the full names be used? For example Sheffield Steelers and Sheffield Scimitars are two different sides, yet on here it just says "Sheffield" for both. - Yorkshirian (talk) 20:07, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Full names?

message: The link to "Southampton Spitfires" links to a rugby team. Both teams have the same name. I don't know if any of the other links are broken, and I don't know how to fix it. --188.220.102.130 (talk) 15:56, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've pointed the Southampton Spitfires to Southampton Spitfires(Ice Hockey) so it's flagged as a broken link now in line with the rest of the links.131.251.142.86 (talk) 09:17, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken link
Talk:Henry Shukman

message: There was an article titled 'Friends of the Western Buddhist Order: Friends, Foes, and Files'  by Henry Shukman, published in Tricycle: The Buddhist Review Vol VIII No. 4 Summer 1999. In this article, Tricycle stated: 'Henry Shukman has written for many publications in Britain and America. His poetry and fiction have appeared in leading reviews, and his latest book is Savage Pilgrims (HarperCollins), about a journey to D. H. Lawrence's New Mexico.'
Does anyone know if this is the same Henry Shukman, or a different one? EmmDee (talk) 03:32, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mammoth (2009 film)

message: I really hoped this film would have something to do with mammoths. :(  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.91.9.219 (talk) 02:57, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

message: I was on Recent Changes Patrol, and noted that a new cast member was added to the "Cast" section of this article.  I looked on the IMDB to try to verify the entry but could not.  But then I also noted that most of the listed cast members could not be verified.  Seems to me that this section needs to be brought into compliance with Wikipedia:Verifiability.    Pinethicket (talk) 13:40, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The cast list can be found at the Swedish Film Institute or in the end credits of the film itself. Don't know about the new addition though, seems like it should be removed. Smetanahue (talk) 13:59, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the fast response.  The name recently added is not listed and I will remove it.  I will also add the ref you provided as a reference for the section.  Regards,    Pinethicket (talk) 14:09, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Other sites have "Natthamonkarn Srinikornchot" as the actress who plays Cookie (e.g. ). Schissel | Sound the Note! 18:13, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast
Talk:Henry Eccles

message: "lay under the"... - is this too-direct translation from some other language? That's incomprehensible... Schissel | Sound the Note! 17:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The co-produced work mentioned.

message: I'm not an expert on this but there appears to be a confusion as to which Henry Eccles this article refers to. I believe there are two, Henry Eccles the younger and Henry Eccles the elder who is apparently the Uncle of the younger Henry. This article needs to be either split to include an article for each or clarify who it is referring to. A good reference I found is  Vrenator talk 12:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Which Henry Eccles
Talk:Nate the Great

message: We list 26 books first published 1972 to 2009. Oddly, both LibraryThing and KidsRead cover volumes 1–25. I added the latter to External links. 
--P64 (talk) 21:32, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series 

message: Removed the text and reference below. The text appears incomplete and I can't find a text match in the reference (after checking the Wayback Machine). The reference doesn't appear to be used for any other part of the article at this time.
Also, a comment "regarding all of their writing" may be better placed on the author page (Marjorie Weinman Sharmat)
Removed items below:
Regarding all of their writing, Mitchell Sharmat once told Something About the Author (quoted by Greenville Public Library):
Wayback Machine archive of dead link:
https://web.archive.org/web/20140313082720/http://www.yourlibrary.ws/childrens_webpage/e-author112000.htm JohnRussell (talk) 03:03, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  note on removed text
Talk:Minster FM

message: This page reads like an advert. Stuffed with hyperlinks back to the stations own website too. I have removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rwickham (talk • contribs) 10:23, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Western Mindanao State University

message: It is to my suggestion that Zamboanga del Norte Agricultural College should be merged with Western Mindanao State University. I absolutely think that having a page just for the name change is unnecessary; it would be ample to have a section on this article concerning the name change. ChaseAm (talk) 21:38, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the merger. Just same thing was done in articles like [Sultan Kudarat Polytechnic State College] to [Sultan Kudarat State College] Bonvallite (talk) 03:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:160 Squadron (Israel)

message: the text seems to be nearly word for word taken from the globalsecuriy.org web site. looks like a copyright problem.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SoP II (talk • contribs) 21:03, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Centroidal Voronoi tessellation

message: This material was removed from the Voronoi diagram page as it was deemed not directly applicable.
:Ok. I removed the merge proposition. --Berland 18:18, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it possible to edit this article with many improvements? Dharmacat (talk) 18:26, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Ford Transcontinental

message: According to unsourced statements on the Dutch Wikipedia, the transcontinental was susceptible to rust because the cab was transported untreated from France to the Netherlands, and the engine consumed more fuel than competing trucks. Maybe someone can find a source for this and add it to the article. :nl:Ford Nederland#Vrachtauto's Pieceofmetalwork (talk) 23:12, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional reasons why sales remained low
Talk:Alvin Wistert

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?]
*If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
*There may be an applicable infobox for this article. For example, see Template:Infobox Person, Template:Infobox School, or Template:Infobox City.[?] (Note that there might not be an applicable infobox; remember that these suggestions are not generated manually)
*This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.[?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD)  23:00, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto Peer Review 

message: Unfortunately I'm having to quick fail the articles of all three Wistert brothers nominated for GA status. Per the GA criteria, stub articles cannot be GA listed in their current form.  Feel free to renominate once the article has been further expanded. Happy editing! Frickative (talk) 22:02, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA quick fail
Talk:Whitey Wistert

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*Consider removing links that add little to the article or that have been repeated in close proximity to other links to the same article, as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links) and WP:CONTEXT.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?]
*If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
*This article is a bit too short, and therefore may not be as comprehensive as WP:WIAFA critera 1(b) is looking for. Please see if anything can be expanded upon.[?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD)  22:57, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto Peer Review 

message: Unfortunately I'm having to quick fail the articles of all three Wistert brothers nominated for GA status. Per the GA criteria, stub articles cannot be GA listed in their current form.  Feel free to renominate once the article has been further expanded. Happy editing! Frickative (talk) 22:01, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA quick fail

message: Whitey Wistert has been listed as a good article. I was suprised at how much info you people had sourced about a subject so old. Congratulations to all who helped this article achieve GA status! RC-0722 (talk) 01:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article
Talk:Madigan Army Medical Center

message: Madigan General Hospital (Fort Lewis) --X-Weinzar (talk) 01:28, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  potentially useful 

message: I filled out additional parts of the Infobox hospital.  There may be a way of combining the two infoboxes.  With a little more cleanup, it should be at least a C or maybe B class article.  WP:HOS  -- Talk to G Moore 19:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:HOS