Talk:Pannonian Rusyns

message: To prevent continual edit warring, can I suggest you list this disagreement at Wikipedia:Requests for comment since doesn't seem to be getting resolved here. It may help to have an uninterested party or two look it over. Yomangani 10:57, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Meanwhile I have reverted to restore the categorization and the ethnic group template. Removing them was unhelpful. Within the template I have stated that the Pannonian Rusyns are related to the Rusyns and other Slavic peoples: I don't think anyone would argue with that. Andrew Dalby 11:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are also related to Slovaks because their language is more similar to Slovak than to (northern) Rusyn. Regarding edit war, we deal here with known vandal that constantly vandalizing articles related to Slavic peoples including removal of the tables and changing of populatioon figures. There are very few of his changes that are not reverted by other users. PANONIAN (talk) 12:29, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It still might be a good idea to take it to Wikipedia:Requests for comment, if only to reach a consensus and stop the uninformed (like me) reverting what looks like vandalism. Sometimes it can help put a stop to POV edit warring before it becomes a point of honour. Yomangani 12:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I do not know how to take it to the Requests for comment, you can do it if you want, but my point is that comment should not be about this article, but about this anonymous user. See his changes: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=72.144.60.29 He performing this content blanking into several articles (for example Yugoslavs, Silesians, Muslims by nationality, Slavic peoples, Janjevci, etc). It is clear that we deal here with vandal and comment should be about his edits in general, not about one of the articles that he edit. PANONIAN (talk) 14:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

text: That IS NOT A FACT, but your PERSONAL OPINION!!!! Who are you to tell to people that nationality that they declare in census does not exist? You are smarter that thousands of people that declare themselves as Yugoslavs or as Muslims by nationality? I do not think so... PANONIAN (talk) 22:16, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverts

message: *I think both names (present time)Ruthenians and Rusyns are okay, though i prefer Rusyns as its something like Hungarian and Magyar, most if not all Hungarians call themselves Magyars. 
*I also believe Pannonian Rusyns are ethnically Carpathian Rusyns from east Slovakia region, which were separated hundreds of years ago. I have personally been to Serbia and Slovakia (spoke with people who identify themselves as Rusyn) and can say that the language is almost identical. With one having slight Serbian tones and the other Slovak tones. But the key similarity was in the words they share which are not part of the Serbian of Slovak languages.
**As such the spelling Rusin IMHO, should not be used for Pannonian Rusyns as they are the same ethnicity as the Rusyns which inhabit eastern Slovakia.
Many Germans consider the Austrians to be Germans. And ironically many Russians consider the Ukrainians to to Russians.
If the governments of the USSR , Ukrainian SSR and modern day Ukraine were to recognise the Rusyns as a distinct ethnicity within the nation of Ukraine then things might be different for the Rusyns of that region.
Idiszero 15:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My 2 cents 

message: This link is broken. Is the sentence "the number of Panonian Rusyns declines" correct? Because I suspect it should be either "has declined" or even "is declining", but I can't determine based on the unavailable article.--Adûnâi (talk) 23:37, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A broken link 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Pannonian Rusyns. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080422082420/http://www.ruskikerestur.com/Anglijski/OkerestureAnglijski.htm to http://www.ruskikerestur.com/Anglijski/OkerestureAnglijski.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090306230621/http://www.blic.rs/reportaza.php?id=81230 to http://www.blic.rs/reportaza.php?id=81230
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131227001603/http://www.pravosudje.hr/europska-povelja-o-regionalnim-ili-manjinskim-jezi to http://www.pravosudje.hr/europska-povelja-o-regionalnim-ili-manjinskim-jezi
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070621144948/http://www.sriu.hr/hrvatski/RusiniHrvatske.htm to http://www.sriu.hr/hrvatski/RusiniHrvatske.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: If anyone checks the map, it's clear, that almost none of them live in Pannonia—almost all of Rusyns in Voivodina live outside of Pannonia. Why Pannonian? Anyway, Pannonia inside Voivodina means Syrmia and only Syrmia in the ancient meaning. If somebody means the Pannonian Basin under the term Pannonian, than all Rusyns of nowadays' Hungary, Slovakia, Ukraine and Rumania should be included. If somebody means the Pannonian Lowland under the term Pannonian: at least Hungary and Ukraine also have Rusyns on Pannonian Lowland, not only Voivodina. I really don't understand this new naming. Capras Dávid (talk) 02:05, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This is just happens to be the most widely-used, english-language ethnonym. Despite modern populations in the lowlands of Slovakia, Hungary, etc., historically, this was the most significant migrant community in the Basin. KaerbaqianRen💬 07:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why ''Pannonian?''