lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Holy Wars... The Punishment Due

message: I moved this page to "Holy Wars... the Punishment Due" originally due to WP:CAPS capitalization rules. However, after reading the article more closely, it appears that "The Punishment Due" is acutally the subtitle of this song, as can be seen from this quote from the article:
The song has an unusual structure, shifting at 2:26 after an acoustic bridge by Marty Friedman to a different, slower and heavier section called "The Punishment Due", and returns towards the end back to "Holy Wars", after a solo played by Dave Mustaine. The entire song is generally referred to as simply "Holy Wars".
This differs from other Megadeth titles like Killing Is My Business... and Business Is Good! and Peace Sells... but Who's Buying?; since the words after the ellipses begin with coordinating conjunctions, these words are clearly part of the main title. "The Punishment Due" is an exception, as it is separate from the main title.
However, I'm not entirely sure this is justification for a capitalization of the "the", so I decided to get some user input. -Xnux the Echidna 15:15, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Carcinogenic bacteria

message: Anyone mind a new title for this page? II | (t - c) 14:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter that much to me. I just noticed that this review uses the word carcinogenesis quite a bit in referring to the effects of the bacteria, but never flat out out calls them carcinogenic. However, it is better to keep this page broad ... the paper also discusses diagnostic and preventative bacteria. II | (t - c) 06:20, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

text: FYI, II, the paper you refer to was mentioned in recent discussion in the main cancer article; many view this (and other such journals) as low level and not having the impact or significance of, say, a JAMA. This doesn't necessarily reflect my own view as the article you cite---whatever its hosts'  standing---can serve as a springboard for further discussion provided there's enough open mindedness to do so. As I'm sure you know, the article in question lists many references to other professional journals from which such discussion can be carried further. (Ronsword (talk) 15:49, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving to carcinogenic bacteria 

message: I think the following sentence should be deleted: "In 1990 the National Cancer Institute published a review of Livingston's theories, concluding that her methods of classifying the cancer bacterium contained "remarkable errors" and it was actually a case of misclassification - the bacteria was actually Staphylococcus epidermidis." This slants this article as a critique of Livingston---one already plainly delineated in the actual lead article on Virginia Livingston. Thus, the sentence is redundant and makes the article too centered on 'Virginia Livingston'. This article should be primarily focused on "cancer bacteria". Ronsword (talk) 04:20, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The edits looks good. Ronsword (talk) 14:53, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History Revision

message: The article mentions researchers like Royal Rife a proponent of radionics, but no mention their work was criticized by medical experts for being quackery. Also Can Bacteria Cause Cancer? by David J. Hess is cited on the article, but there is criticism of this book What Is the Role of Bacteria In Cancer Carcinogenesis? , Hess's book is entirely unreliable as he supports the work of Gaston Naessens and other quacks and invokes conspiracy theories that the work of alternative cancer researchers has been 'suppressed' by mainstream doctors. HealthyGirl (talk) 17:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Quacks

message: — Assignment last updated by H2Oworks (talk) 17:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Reading and Writing in the Natural Sciences
Talk:Joseph White Musser

message: While Joseph's authority comes partly through John Y. Barlow, the AUB was not established until after Barlow's death (1952 with the ordination of the 1952 New Priesthood Council). Putting Barlow as a president of the AUB would be somewhat inaccurate. While it may be a church position of the AUB, putting the information on wikipedia could confuse the reader as to founded dates, etc. --Sthatting 20:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The AUB may have been established as a legal body later than 1952 (1960s?), but how would AUB succession beliefs be represented unless by putting Barlow before Musser.  Neither Barlow, Musser or Zitting were leaders of Short Creek (other men had been appointed to that position), and Barlow and Musser were leaders of Fundamentalists outside Short Creek.  It seems to me that using AUB & FLDS would be more understandable and accepted by their followers 
--Tobey 01:42, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't that just be mentioned in the AUB article? --Sthatting 16:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AUB & Short Creek Community Succession boxes
Talk:Leroy S. Johnson

message: To refer to Johnson as "Prophet and President of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints" is a bit anachronistic, as the group was not called or incorporated as such until nearly five years after his death. It would probably be more historically accurate to refer to him simply as "Senior Member of the Priesthood Council (Short Creek Community)." Also, if we're going to include Charles Zitting's unrecognized position as Senior Member in the succession boxes, it might be prudent to note that Joseph W. Musser's claim to the office is also unrecognized by the FLDS, whose official line of succession goes straight to Johnson after the death of John Y. Barlow. --Worthington56 (talk) 23:32, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Sound good to me.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 11:55, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the only way to really make it work is to just pull the FLDS Church Titles out of the box completely.  The issue is that there "succession" is significantly different then most Short Creek Community (known as the Woolley Group before 1935) "succession" line, eve though they share the same line before 1954.  I think I have it figured out now.  Let me know if it works for you.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 13:34, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me! Thanks. --Worthington56 (talk) 21:57, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succession boxes, etc. 
Talk:Maserati (band)

message: Drummer Jerry Fuchs died on November 8, 2009. Someone should update the article. Source: http://www.chunklet.com/index.cfm?section=blogs&ID=571  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.81.114.132 (talk) 19:28, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fuchs's death

message: An anon has contested the Post source saying Gius wasn't in the band. Anyone with more info on this? Chubbles (talk) 00:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mikel Gius
Talk:Greece runestones

message: What is the purpose in saying "about 30 stones"? Does no one know exactly how many there are? The article describes 30 stones. Are there more? If not, the statement should say "there are 30 stones." This is, after all, a scientific article. Caeruleancentaur (talk) 11:41, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: On some stones, some runes are damaged so that we cannot be 100% certain that they referred to Greece. We also have U 153 that may mention Greece, but Rundata 2.5 does not include that interpretation. There is also U 925 where "south" may refer to Greece, but we don't know (see U 922). In all likelihood there are undiscovered stones to be discovered as well.--Berig (talk) 11:49, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  30 stones? 

message: What a wonderful article. And it leads onto the other Runestone articles, which are also of great interest. Very many thanks to the editor(s).
45ossington (talk) 12:45, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, for telling me you like it :)--Berig (talk) 12:47, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: An expression of gratitude

message: Why the capitalization? Isn't the article Greece runestones, even in a world where "Greece" is an adjective?--Wetman (talk) 16:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are probably right. I was influenced by the name of the Kensington Runestone, the only "runestone" that can be said to have an established English name.--Berig (talk) 17:24, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Compare with Rökstenen and "Rök Runestone", which is a direct translation of a proper noun. Since greklandsstenar is not a proper noun, it probably should be "Greece runestones". –Holt (T•C) 17:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been thinking of this for a while actually, and also of whether other similar article names (e.g. England Runestones) should be uncapitalized. I think I'll do it tomorrow, so I won't cause any problems while the article is on the main page.--Berig (talk) 17:56, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization

message: I think "Holmi" can be Holmgård which is the old name for Novgorod?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.226.222.111 (talk) 20:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  At Ög 81 the word Holmi is mentioned - Can it be Holmgård instead of Borgholm or a duel? 
Talk:Innoventions (Epcot)

message: Please add more information about the exhibits if you have any new information. 53180 20:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What an incredibly niche thing to post, but I just had a OneDrive memory from January 2000 pop up with a "I went surfing @ IBM @ Epcot" auto-generated caption.  When looking into what in the world that even was, I eventually found this page, but it claims IBM was only involved until 1999 and then again in 2002, which definitely does not line up with my souvenirs. 2604:2D80:D380:A500:E80E:33F2:ACCF:BAE2 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 15:54, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  IBM Sponsorship Years Wrong
Talk:Mission Albany

message: No mention of Capt. Frank L. Lillyman???
It is so sad there is not an article about him in Wikipedia...
George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 20:04, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  SO DISAPPOINTING!!
Talk:John W. Woolley

message: The infobox links to John Taylor, which is a DAB page. I presume that it should link to John Taylor (Mormon), who is linked elsewhere in the article. Can someone who knows their way around Template:Latter Day Saint biography help fix this problem? Narky Blert (talk) 14:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: John Taylor
Talk:Annals and Antiquities of Rajasthan

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Guru Shikhar

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:04, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
File talk:Manchuria basin1.JPG

message: The drainage area of Amur River is not very precise.  Amur River has two major upstream branches: one along the border between Mongolia and Russia and another along the border between China's Inner Mongolia and Russia.  The drainage region of the upstreams of Amur River, which is to the west of "Sugari/Nen Drainage Basin", is not depicted in the image. --Jiejunkong 22:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Embroidery thread

message: "Perle cotton, pearl cotton, or French coton perlé is an S-twisted, 2-ply thread with high sheen, sold in five sizes or weights (No. 3, 5, 8, 12 and 16 (Finca), with 3 being the heaviest and 16 the finest)."
I am no textile expert, but this has to be wrong. I use No. 10 Cotton Pearl almost exclusively. I live in the US.
TitaniumMomma (talk) 07:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cotton Pearl Sizes 

message: This is 4-ply - not 5-ply. It is often somewhat shiny, though I believe this may depend on where you live. See https://www.dmc.com/uk/size-16-special-embroidery-thread-2.html, for example. --81.98.100.51 (talk) 00:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coton A Broder 

message: Why is embroidery thread called floss 2600:387:F:E37:0:0:0:1 (talk) 03:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  why is it called floss
Talk:Biomimetic material

message: A biomimetic materials probably more likely is made either to mimic a biological material OR is produced by mimicking a biological procedure, rather than specifically have to interact with the extracellular matrix although it probably does anyway at least when it is contact with any ECM.  See the entry on bionics. Benkeboy 21:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Even Stevens characters

message: If there are any known missing characters, please add them. 53180 21:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Left Spine Down

message: Hm, listing the very first genre as "cyberpunk" is troublesome, as the cyberpunk article really deals with the literary genre, and is rather vague / open ended as to any official musical analogue. Maybe Digital Hardcore would be more appropriate? Judging by the tagging at Last.fm, and the fact that the digital hardcore article links to them as a notable digital hardcore artist, I think this would be more appropriate than cyberpunk. Also, stylistically, this artist is very, very similar to Rabbit Junk (at least in what I've heard of them), and Rabbit Junk is usually classified as being digital hardcore also (despite their attempts at calling it "hardclash", whatever that is). michaelb Talk to this user 20:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cyberpunk music genre

message: Digital Hardcore, no? Along the Lines of Rabbit Junk.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.162.79 (talk) 09:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looks like we agree. I changed "cyberpunk" (which is not a music genre) to "digital hardcore" which is. Completely beside the point and non-encyclopedic, is it me or is "iPunk" the lamest thing evuh to call digital hardcore? (Yes, I know Wikipedia is not a message board, but I just had to say that...) michaelb Talk to this user 18:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre
Talk:The Shizit

message: Notable digital hardcore act. References:
* http://www.discogs.com/artist/Shizit%2C+The
* http://web.archive.org/web/20010206093130/artists.mp3s.com/artists/34/the_shizit.html
* http://www.brianbacklash.com/interview35.html
//Gargaj (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hangon
Talk:Breakers (1996 video game)

message: The Japanese article has some information the English article lacks and needs. Parrothead1983 (talk) 00:24, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation request

message: This article was titled with "arcade game", because it was originally developed as an arcade game.  "Video game" is too generic. Parrothead1983 (talk) 08:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Arcade game VS. video game
Talk:A Split-Second

message: There's a lot to be worked out over at the New Beat article, but I did do a little editing of the story here in the meantime. Despite all of the perspectives on how New Beat evolved, one consistent fact is that A Split-Second's "Flesh" was the definitive example of an EBM track that was pitched down to create the distinctive New Beat sound. It wasn't likely the only one, but no one has yet refuted that this track was involved. Once the genre article is better structured, perhaps a clearer version of that story can be ported here. -- t_kiehne (talk) 23:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Beat 
Talk:Ship stability

message: Do we think that finite element is used? It may be finite difference, but I am pretty sure that the water is not modelled quite so accurately as FEA, it is just iteratively computed, so not even FD perhaps. Antony 119.11.113.211 (talk) 08:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

message: Please conduct merge discussion at: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Ships#Stability. Regards, The Land (talk) 17:50, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: The section gives wrong information. Active roll stabilizers are not intended to give stability but just to reduce roll motions for crew and passengers comfort. Roll stabilizers intend to reduce uncomfortable roll accelerations (due to larger GM / more stability). Manoj nav (talk) 13:07, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add-on stability systems 

message: - Replaced reference to "CargoMax" and "MACS3" with general reference to "commercially available" software. In the years since these two programs were mentioned a number of other commercially available computer based systems for measuring stability on ships have been developed. Seems biased to mention only these two without listing all the others. Mtheadmama (talk) 07:17, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Required Stability 

message: This is specifically relevant to the image.  I am not a ship designer but it is my understanding that it is more stable for the CG (center of gravity) to be above the CB (center of buoyancy).  This way the corrective torque caused by the vertical misalignment of the buoyancy and gravity is not further amplified by the CG being below the CB.  The amplification could lead to extreme wobbling in some cases due to resonance.
Hopefully someone more knowledgeable on this can provide further insight.
JustinJustin (talk) 20:48, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I believe the section on Calculated stability conditions is partially incorrect.
Talk:Manuel Antonio Mesones Muro

message: The original text appears to have been written by a Spanish-speaking author.  I have tried to Anglicise the text, in some cases having to interpret the text while trying not to lose the original meaning.  Some lack of clarity remains - for example the reference to a "documented letter" and Mesones's study of mathematical planes (perhaps topography or relief mapping).  The reference to the "First commercial expedition" is minimal, similarly the collapse of the Huancabamba River diversion scheme. The eventual importance of Mesones's expeditions for the Interoceanic Highway might be examined. Opbeith (talk) 11:52, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anglicisation and further work needed 
Talk:Green chile

message: I love that this redirects to New Mexican Cuisine - but it's not really the best place this redirect can go, I think.  Perhaps to chili pepper or a page about common chiles that would be referred to by this term. (Anaheim, etc).  --ABQCat 21:39, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and executed.  Red chile, too. ENeville (talk) 21:13, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

text: The problem with that is Green Chili is a term specific to New Mexico cuisine.  It doesn't refer to chili peppers in general.  It doesn't even refer to Anaheims in particular.  It refers to Anaheim peppers that have undergone specific preperations required for New Mexican cuisine.  Linking it here is like linking the term BBQ to a general article about grilled meats.  Shameful. --66.102.16.22 (talk) 16:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:No Man Knows My History

message: Paragraph 2 states that the 1945 book has "never been out of print" -- indicating a time marker of "60 years later" and asserting without evidence that it "continues" to sell a thousand copies a year. It's now 2023, not 2005, so this paragraph should be updated and referenced. Ideally, time should be marked specifically (e.g., "as of 2023, it is still in print, having sold x copies in 2022") so that a fact that was once true is not assumed to be eternally true. Martindo (talk) 01:38, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update the lede
Talk:Thomas W. Murphy (anthropologist)

message: Deleted this section as I think it was there to promote Living Hope ministries. Also, it has been suggested that the videos do not fully/fairly represent his views  Doug Weller (talk) 12:27, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributions to media 

message: This entire article smacks of negative bias and does not present the facts as an encyclopedia article should. There is hardly any citation support for any of the claims made. The entire article is in need of serious revision.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.250.23.7 (talk) 22:18, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've cleaned it up a bit, removing stuff that was clearly WP:OR and where citations had been requested long ago and hadn't been found. Dougweller (talk) 05:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks much better. Thanks! 74.250.23.7 (talk) 12:40, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative Bias 

message: I am curious as to why all mention of the church's attempt to excommunicate Tom and Simon has been completed deleted from the page...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.156.251.64 (talk) 20:13, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm concerned by this, too, as it's a very significant action--Murphy's own church attempted to excommunicate him because he took a very public stance against the authenticity of the Book of Mormon, and there was evidence that this was done (and, IIRC, the sources for such were provided, though there were some statements that needed additional source material to back those up).  Murphy and Southerton were both threatened with excommunication for their public position on BoMor; in Southerton's case, he actually was excommunicated (on the basis of another cause having nothing to do with Southerton's BoMor position, which Southerton said upset him greatly).  Why were they removed? Scarletsmith (talk) 17:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Excommunication Info Deleted?
Talk:Coat of arms of Honduras

message: File:Coat_of_arms_of_Honduras.svg
File:Coat_of_arms_of_Honduras_(variant_1).svg
File:Coat_of_arms_of_Honduras_(variant_2).svg 
File:Escudo_De_Honduras.png
Article(s): 
; Request:
: The coat of arms was adopted in 1825, so it is therefore out of copyright.
: However there are no fewer than 6 variants in use. (at least the ones that match the description in the law)
:* :File:Coat_of_arms_of_Honduras.svg
:* :File:Coat_of_arms_of_Honduras_(variant_1).svg
:* :File:Coat_of_arms_of_Honduras_(variant_2).svg (used in the naval ensign file)
:* https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/h/hn).gif
:* :File:Escudo_De_Honduras.png
:* https://www.brandsoftheworld.com/logo/honduras-escudo-nacional
: --— Preceding unsigned comment added by IP (talk • contribs) 98.213.225.105 (UTC)
Copied from the page "Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop". --Donald Trung (talk)  12:40, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the coat of arms of Honduras (and therefore the naval ensign)
Talk:Mehmed Paša Sokolović Bridge

message: I have classified this article as a stub. It needs more information on its history and cultural significance. Capitalistroadster 22:04, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification

message: In the section "Renovation", I've replaced the words "reconstruct" and "rebuild" with "restore" and "renovate". When I was there in 2015, there were in fact smaller works going on on the bridge, but the wording suggested that the bridge had desappeared or completely broken down... if not, you don't need to "rebuild" it. I haven't been able to find any reference for any mayor damage to the bridge after World War I, which was completely repaired in 1951, so there can't have been a "reconstruction" in the last years. Ilyacadiz (talk) 10:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rebuild"? 