Talk:DNN (software)

message: Article needs to reflect newest versions of DotNetNuke.  These are 3.3.2 and 4.3.2.
Latest version is 4.8.2. Medicineworker (talk) 14:24, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Versions 

message: User:Elkhiyarih added a paragraph to the criticisms section that seems to be both inaccurate and biased. Microsoft hasn't removed the DotNetNuke forums altogether -- there is still a link to them although they are now hosted on the DNN website. I presume the reason for this is that the DNN community is becoming so large that it allows much more in-depth and detailed coverage of the framework. The paragraph also seems to have a fairly strong anti-Microsoft bias. Oh, and it doesn't cite its sources. — jammycakes 23:46, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future of DotNetNuke 

message: This section never describes what a container is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.46.200.226 (talk) 00:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skins and Containers 

message: I noticed that the article has been heavily edited on 2009-10-15 (by user 'audiohifi'). Even though I'm new to DotNetNuke (and relatively new as a Wikipedia contributor), I have my doubts and I wonder if anyone has noticed it. Entire sections have been deleted and/or rewritten, and I think the new text is not as good as it should be. Some points I noticed: (a) the history section has been deleted; (b) a youtube video is promoted as if it were important (including giving two names as the authors), while it's more like a parody on a commercial (see "A narrative video overview...").
Before I discovered the above I had already done some minor edits, which apply only to the new text so they can be discarded if the above edits are reverted.
Jacosi (talk) 11:31, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavy edits on 2009-10-15 - Please check 

message: Is it really necessary to have twitter/facebook/etc. links? I think these should be deleted since they make the article as a whole feel like a free advertisement for the platform.
Vagrant Bias (talk) 04:38, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Links: NPOV 

message: I'm not trying to spam the discussion page, but this article needs some love. I'd like to go ahead and begin rewriting and reorganizing it with reputable third-party references.
Vagrant Bias (talk) 21:44, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major re-write 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on DotNetNuke. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100618231626/http://www.cmswire.com/downloads/cms-market-share/ to http://www.cmswire.com/downloads/cms-market-share/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The title is DDN, but the article refers to DNN. Suggest move for rename. Requires changes to disambiguation pages for both DDN and DNN.
Drummist180 (talk) 03:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title typo