Talk:Ziya Gökalp

message: == ... ==
* The final and official replacement of Constantinople by Istanbul did not take place until 1930., "Istanbul and the Civilization of the Ottoman Empire", by Bernard Lewis, p. x 
* The capital of the Ottoman Empire was originally called Constantinople.....and did not officially adopt the name Istanbul until 1930, "New Encyclopedia of Islam", by Cyril Glasse, p.229 
* ...Constantinople was not officially renamed until 1930..., "Daily Life in Ancient and Modern Istanbul", by Robert Bator, p.33 
* Istanbul was only adopted as the city's official name in 1930...., "Osman's Dream", by Caroline Finkel, p. 57 --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  How is this connected to Ziya Gökalp? Deliogul (talk) 10:37, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I wonder. Since certain nationalists just have to ignore their own history; Turkish Postal Law changed Constantinople to Istanbul in 1930. But why use facts when you have nationalistic fervor to push an agenda? --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Nothing you have wrote justifies your deletion of a reflist or the deletion of references or referenced information. You are more than welcome to indicate Kürt Aşiretleri Hakkında Sosyolojik Tetkikler's reference of her as a Turk.  --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: * The final and official replacement of Constantinople by Istanbul did not take place until 1930., "Istanbul and the Civilization of the Ottoman Empire", by Bernard Lewis, p. x 
* The capital of the Ottoman Empire was originally called Constantinople.....and did not officially adopt the name Istanbul until 1930, "New Encyclopedia of Islam", by Cyril Glasse, p.229 
* ...Constantinople was not officially renamed until 1930..., "Daily Life in Ancient and Modern Istanbul", by Robert Bator, p.33 
* Istanbul was only adopted as the city's official name in 1930...., "Osman's Dream", by Caroline Finkel, p. 57 --Kansas Bear (talk) 17:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  How is this connected to Ziya Gökalp? Deliogul (talk) 10:37, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I wonder. Since certain nationalists just have to ignore their own history; Turkish Postal Law changed Constantinople to Istanbul in 1930. But why use facts when you have nationalistic fervor to push an agenda? --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Nothing you have wrote justifies your deletion of a reflist or the deletion of references or referenced information. You are more than welcome to indicate Kürt Aşiretleri Hakkında Sosyolojik Tetkikler's reference of her as a Turk.  --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:56, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... 

message: It is all right to say that he is of Zaza descent, but not in the very first sentence. Doesn't he describe himself as a Turk? So why do we put his ethnic background in the very first sentence? It is the same case as in Mesut Özil. If the first sentence in this article is convenient, why don't we add his etnic background in the first sentence in the article of Mesut Özil? --Seksen iki yüz kırk beş (talk) 18:56, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first sentence 

message: how can someone who says he is of Turkish origin be of Zaza and Kurdish origin ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tengrilera (talk • contribs) 03:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  how can someone who says he is of Turkish origin be of Zaza and Kurdish origin ? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:08, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion