Talk:Žirmūnai

message: Maybe we should divide the early history section in 3 parts, Zvejai, Tuskelenai, and Siaures miesteles? It's getting kind of long.
:I just thought about the same today ;) Iulius 19:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: maybe to provide them with resources - food, timber maybe something else. Maybe supply would be better? Iulius 19:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Should not link Iulius 19:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

text: This 'manor' is so little that not worth much mention at all :D Iulius 19:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree Iulius 19:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

text: glad you liked the pictures. a longer article deserved more images and here they are.Iulius 19:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I read the reference but like you, having trouble phrasing it. Some idea will come. In the meantime, maybe we should just put it up for review, before the curve of diminishing returns begins to flatten. Clearly this process is asymptotic. But you, Juozas, should have the last word. BTW, apropos of changing "white little palace" to "little white palace", my sis, friends, and I have had a number of great discussions about the order of multiple adjectives in English - what IS the rule? Some say it goes from more general to more specific - little applies to more things than white does? No, everything material has a color; but little can apply to abstract things as well, so maybe the rule does apply here. What about didzulis, baisus vabalas? Does it follow the same rule? Such entertainment. Hope the edits were OK; the idea was to put them into a more chronological order. Novickas 15:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The multiple adjectives must a be "language feeling" thing. As a side note, why do we write Žirmūnai Bridge but Žirmūnų Street? Does it "feel" okay in English? Juozas Rimas 21:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh, it should be Žirmūnai street. Novickas 21:55, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I do not like removal of occupation part, Juozas, but for stability let it be for now. M.K. 22:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions 11/29/06 

message: Standard crime statistics, or at least the easiest ones to find, are expressed as crimes per 1,000 persons per year. So I'm thinking we should take out the December 2005 crime rate (not the number of crimes) so as not to compare apples and oranges. Novickas 16:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Crime

message: Maybe contributors who improved this article, would like to do the same with Vilnius? It is a bit shame that so nice city has a not fully developed article. So I just wondering maybe you all try to work on it too. A? M.K. 09:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, creation and improvement of Žirmūmai proved to be an example of a matter of principle and a rare instance of successful and sought after Lithuanian collaboration on English wiki Iulius 10:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Awesome! I thought it is not really possible: really obscure topic, no sources, just bits of details there and there... Great job! Sorry I could not chip in... Yes, on to Vilnius! Renata 00:02, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Much the same applies to me as well... Iulius 21:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I did not understand the last part of your remark - Vilnius talk is archived already. Nevertheless all talk about Vilnius should go to its talk. M.K. 19:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Another

message: This article is on hold for the following reasons:
#Section headings should not repeat the title as according to WP:MSH.
#Please convert all bulleted lists into prose as according to Wikipedia:Embedded list.
#Per WP:MOS, avoid using words/phrases that indicate time periods relative to the current day. For example, recently might be terms that should be replaced with specific dates/times.
#If possible extend the first or add a fourth paragraph to bring the article to WP:LEAD.
When these objections are addressed feel free to contact me. Tarret 20:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I need some sleep :) Renata 12:17, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: C'mon - its daytime.. Iulius 12:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Which time zone? :) Renata 06:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

text: No, not intentionally. I just finished it. So objection #1 - done, #2 - done, #3 - needs to be double checked, but I believe done, #4 - can someone write more in the lead? Renata 06:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA On Hold

message: This article is excellent. I know that those involved now want to move on to tidying up and improving the Vilnius article. After you've done that, perhaps you could consider editing the articles for the other districts/suburbs of Vilnius? It would be great if they were as detailed and well-written as this one.
And then after that perhaps other cities and towns of Lithuania.....?
It would be fantastic to make Wikipedia a detailed English-language source of info on Lithuania. Perhaps it could help promote the country and bring in more tourists?
Originally from the UK, I lived and worked in Vilnius for two years. I'm back in London now, but I'd be happy to help in any way I can.
--Terryc 09:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Everyone's edits and especially copyedits are very welcome in Lithuania-related pages. Nice to see you around. Iulius 09:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Other districts

message: In re The Ideal Communist City. This book is frequently cited but with different publication dates - some say "almost 40 years ago", some say "in the 1970s", one says "in the 1950s". Does anyone know enough Russian to find the actual Russian publication date? Novickas 20:53, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question re Soviet Urban Planning

message: Congratulations on this articles promotion. The following is a bot-generated suggestion to bring the article to FA-class.
:The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article?, Images should have concise captions.
*Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (numbers), there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 20 kilometre, use 20 kilometre, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 20 kilometre.
*Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.
*Per WP:WIAFA, this article's table of contents (ToC) may be too long- consider shrinking it down by merging short sections or using a proper system of daughter pages as per Wikipedia:Summary style.
*This article may need to undergo summary style, where a series of appropriate subpages are used. For example, if the article is United States, than an appropriate subpage would be History of the United States, such that a summary of the subpage exists on the mother article, while the subpage goes into more detail.
*Please make the spelling of English words consistent with either American or British spelling, depending upon the subject of the article. Examples include: honour (B) (American: honor), neighbour (B) (American: neighbor), meter (A) (British: metre), metre (B) (American: meter), organize (A) (British: organise), ization (A) (British: isation), program  (A) (British: programme), programme (B) (American: program ).
*Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise. (You may wish to try Tony1's redundancy exercises.)
**Vague terms of size often are unnecessary and redundant -  “some”, “a variety/number/majority of”, “several”, “a few”, “many”, “any”, and “all”. For example, “All pigs are pink, so we thought of a number of ways to turn them green.”
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Tarret 21:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Congratulations for all of us who left a part of our hearts in this article, Juozas Rimas, Novickas, MK etc. Iulius 23:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I say don't stop: I don't think that the article is too far from becoming the first FA on Lithuania :) Renata 01:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hurray! Novickas 13:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Passed

message: What about the architectural style of the will-some-day-be-destroyed Sports Palace. So far more sources claim in favour of Brutalism than Constructivism. Iulius 13:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I need stronger ground support for Constructivism, as there are almost no sources to confirm it, compared to Brutalism, which is in fact quite evident if you look at it :) Besides, I find your suggestion a little too lenghty for this article. Iulius 15:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say neither :) Constructivism was 30-40 years before and brutalism is not quite like that. But I am not an expert in any way. Renata 15:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

text:  I'm sending an email to my brother, who is an architect (see http://www.pulitzer.org/year/1999/criticism/works/day10/page1.html) although his opinion in an email wouldn't be source-able. It does seem more Brutalist. Also it seems to deserve its own article... Novickas 16:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Forgot to mention, the bro's opinion was that it didn't fit well into any category. Novickas 12:48, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

text: thanks for support. However, there are tens of buildings in Vilnius more deserving articles of their own.Iulius 16:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can't argue with that. Just that it's referred to so often in this article. Novickas 18:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

text:  I think it's a matter of reference. There is one reference that it is constructivist, please add one or more for Brutalist (preferably online ref). What about the so-misleading  "Vilnius Palace of Culture, Entertainment and Sports" - is it "functionalist" (one reference only too) or Brutalist? Don't forget Tėvynė cinema too: it is "Soviet historicism" in the reference and I couldn't find such style in Wikipedia. Juozas Rimas 20:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am pretty sure that this style should be somewhere under Stalinist architecture, colleagues lawyers ;) Iulius 21:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brutalism or Constructivism?

message: Proposed some ideas in the peer review article, may be some one would be willing to discuss the actions? Iulius 16:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am hoping that some outsider and uninvolved person (with fresh eyes) would comment on it. Like, does everything make sense? (it was written mostly by people who know the elderate inside-out) Is anything material missing? How's the prose? Etc. Minors stuff like brackets can be fixed quite easily. Renata 17:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it is easy to fix but the agreement should come at first in order to keep from reverting back forth like neris river - river neris etc. Iulius 18:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ideas for peer review

message: User 213.52.162.226, per recent edits, thinks we should follow British usages in this article (e.g. River Neris vs. Neris River). The W. guidelines indicate that it should consistently go all one way or the other, any thoughts? Novickas 18:36, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I stand for english usage that means if we agree one of us could make it consistent in the article metres, centres, etc. Iulius 18:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  British vs US usage 

message: I just spent several hour converting references into proper format using . Could someone with better knowledge of Polish and Russian covert refs #15, 16, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29? Thanks! Renata 09:14, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference format

message: Has anyone ever found information online on the population of Lithuania's rural elderates? We are hesitating whether Žirmūnai's the most populous of all the elderates or just city elderates. The rural elderates might be larger but 47K people (could be 60K now easily) in Žirmūnai are a lot for Lithuania in absolute terms as well. Juozas Rimas 09:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rural elderates? 

message: Do we need any more references in this article? Iulius 09:54, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We need, especially for crime section - first and third paragraphs. M.K. 10:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Anything missing?

message: Presumably the reviewer wants the history in the lead paragraphs shortened? Does anyone know of some FAC city neighborhood articles that we could look at? Novickas 12:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understood the History section do not summarize the rest article history part. M.K. 12:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. What is the little template for editing in progress on a section? Novickas 12:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

text:   M.K. 12:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you expand history summary a bit, as it is too small, in my view. M.K. 09:54, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Agree. Is there a hard and fast deadline on this FAC? Don't have much time just now...Novickas 23:41, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Around two weeks. One is almost gone. M.K. 08:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

text:  Later today. Novickas 13:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

text:  Interesting: a robot was sent to de-list it after six days. Citizendium. Novickas 22:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It was among the FACs removed by User:Raul654. Gimmetrow 02:39, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Could you clarify how long FAC are running? At least for week? M.K. 08:55, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

text:  They run until Raul removes them. Standard is five-six days, but if there is a lot of discussion and the result isn't clear, they may stay two or three weeks. The oldest current FAC has been active over a month. When you resubmit this, be a bit more insistent on people striking objections when they are resolved. Gimmetrow 13:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Eh, you see I thought that there is some time and I did not rush to make adjustment to all listed questions at one time, but instead step by step. And we solved one contributors User:Nichalp remarks and started to making other improvements, but it was interrupted by unexpected FAC closure...M.K. 16:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

text:  A fac is likely to be closed if there are no supports after 5 days. What I would suggest is to go over the objections, fix what you can, and resubmit to FAC in a week or whenever the issues are fixed. Gimmetrow 17:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for comprehensive explanations. M.K. 17:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: FAC

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Epbr123 11:47, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Pass

message: I deleted the apparently nonsensical IPA. Anyone know for sure? kwami (talk) 07:04, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: yes it is.--Lokyz (talk) 21:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is what? If there is a mid tone and a short vowel on the mu (which I find dubious, since Lithuanian ū is a long vowel) and a rising tone on the nai, which tone does the Žir have? (It would probably be easiest to give the Lithuanian transcription, with full diacritics, and we can convert to the IPA from there.) kwami (talk) 20:24, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation 

message: Armia Krajowa soldiers – who had been executed by the NKGB and MGB in the Vilnius' KGB Palace between 1944 and 1947. by user:Renata3  and who had been executed by the NKGB and MGB in the Vilnius' KGB Palace between 1944 and 1947 but also those who died fighting Polish Armia Krajowa soldiers. nu user:Jacurek is rather disturbing difference. 
A question - were there no AK soldiers burried after they surrendered and laid down the arms to the Red army in parade after the so called Operation Ostra Brama.--Lokyz (talk) 21:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I made a mistake. I restored that but the sentence needs to be rewritten because it is confusing.--Jacurek (talk) 22:54, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, what do the sources say exactly? Are these AK soldiers who were killed by the Soviets or AK soldiers who were killed by Nazis and Lithuanian collaborators? Or is it Lithuanians who died at the hands of AK? Or all three (in one of history's ironies)? It definitely is confusing as of now.radek (talk) 16:32, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you do not want AK burrial place mentioned, it is your choice. Although accusations without any knowledge of the situation makes me shrug my shoulders. Peace be with you.--Lokyz (talk) 16:45, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't make any accusations (where?). I was really just curious. If AK soldiers are buried there then that should be mentioned. If Lithuanians who fought against AK are buried there then that too should be mentioned. I'm only asking for clarification here, that's all. And also with you.radek (talk) 16:52, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious ''corrections''

message: Can anyone explain what is wrong with the neutrality or was the tag added just out of thin air?--Lokyz (talk) 06:32, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 

message: Me: the name predates this official establishment.
Lokyz:Any sources to support this allegation? English language preffered.--Lokyz (talk) 05:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New section, just because 

message: A ya, it is connected to Spain, Germany, Norway and etc as well. Regarding "Hispanic" perhaps it is offensive to some, likewise perhaps it is offensive to some to be called "Polish". But I am confident that people will find the way to Oxford dictionary for the explanation [5]. M.K. (talk) 09:40, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another new section, for clarity's sake 

message: It seems like both Altenmann and M.K. are suggesting that the criteria for whether to include other names should be based on whether or not English literature uses a given name, past or present. Is this considered a sufficient condition for inclusion?radek (talk) 18:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: lang-other| 

message: ....and why exactly some people are trying to enforce "a ban" on Polish or Russian spelling of Lithuanian cities and suburbs after so many argument against such a behaviour?? What is so special about Lithuanian cities as oppose to all others? I have to be missing someting here...
Reminder - per Wikipedia:LEAD#Usage_in_first_sentence, alternate names in 1st sentence should reflect consensus. Novickas (talk) 02:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If by consensus you mean "unanimity" then I don't see that in the guideline. Also per Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)#Alternate_names  "Nevertheless, other names, especially those used significantly often (say, 10% of the time or more) in the available English literature on a place, past or present, should be mentioned in the article, as encyclopedic information."radek (talk) 06:27, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war again... or spelling ban enforcement? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Žirmūnai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20111004143031/http://www.ucsj.org/news/rabbis-protest-construction-jewish-cemetery to http://www.ucsj.org/news/rabbis-protest-construction-jewish-cemetery
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20041222151448/http://www.vilnius.lt:80/new/inv_verslas.php?open=280&sub_cat1=281&id=78 to http://www.vilnius.lt/new/inv_verslas.php?open=280&sub_cat1=281&id=78
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:35, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Žirmūnai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070928231540/http://www.maratonas.lt/trasa_en.htm to http://www.maratonas.lt/trasa_en.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:18, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Žirmūnai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071020165648/http://www.rec.org/REC/Programs/Telematics/CAPE/goodpractice/env/doc/3_2monitoring101_122.doc to http://www.rec.org/REC/Programs/Telematics/CAPE/goodpractice/env/doc/3_2monitoring101_122.doc
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.chareidi.shemayisrael.com/archives5765/REI65features2.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929124454/http://www.stat.gov.lt/puslapiai/vasv/statistics.html to http://www.stat.gov.lt/puslapiai/vasv/statistics.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:37, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 15 external links on Žirmūnai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926235531/http://www.stat.gov.lt/en/pages/view/?id=1730 to http://www.stat.gov.lt/en/pages/view/?id=1730
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929124423/http://www.stat.gov.lt/puslapiai/vasv/pdf/vs/05.pdf to http://www.stat.gov.lt/puslapiai/vasv/pdf/vs/05.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929124339/http://www.stat.gov.lt/puslapiai/vasv/vsavsensk/surasymas%20seniunijomis.pdf to http://www.stat.gov.lt/puslapiai/vasv/vsavsensk/surasymas%20seniunijomis.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928181304/http://ct.svs.lt/lmenas/?leid_id=2964&kas=straipsnis&st_id=3028 to http://ct.svs.lt/lmenas/?leid_id=2964&kas=straipsnis&st_id=3028
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071022070008/http://www.paveldas.vilnius.lt/objektas.php?ID=6072&nID=22524&gID=9 to http://www.paveldas.vilnius.lt/objektas.php?ID=6072&nID=22524&gID=9
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928120151/http://www.ngr.lt/map/vilnius42/vilnius42.php?kalba_l=EN&mast=100 to http://www.ngr.lt/map/vilnius42/vilnius42.php?kalba_l=EN&mast=100
*Added  tag to http://www.i-u.ru/biblio/archive/jadov_sociologija/05.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061013051836/http://www.muar.ru/exibitions/2003/exibit051203j.htm to http://www.muar.ru/exibitions/2003/exibit051203j.htm
*Added  tag to http://community.livejournal.com/lost_vilnius/21836.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929124423/http://www.stat.gov.lt/puslapiai/vasv/pdf/vs/05.pdf to http://www.stat.gov.lt/puslapiai/vasv/pdf/vs/05.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061231024951/http://septima.dtiltas.lt/ to http://septima.dtiltas.lt/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070307080814/http://www.vretmm.vilnius.lm.lt/Pradzia.htm to http://www.vretmm.vilnius.lm.lt/Pradzia.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.muziejai.lt/Vilnius/Kompiuterijos%20muziejus.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926235151/http://www.paveldas.vilnius.lt/objektas.php?ID=1845&nID=22529&gID=9 to http://www.paveldas.vilnius.lt/objektas.php?ID=1845&nID=22529&gID=9
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071022071535/http://www.paveldas.vilnius.lt/objektas.php?ID=10713&nID=22524&gID=9 to http://www.paveldas.vilnius.lt/objektas.php?ID=10713&nID=22524&gID=9
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926234925/http://www.paveldas.vilnius.lt/objektas.php?ID=4804&nID=22068&gID=9 to http://www.paveldas.vilnius.lt/objektas.php?ID=4804&nID=22068&gID=9
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070216233959/http://www.newyorkclub.lt/main.aspx?show=about&ID=1 to http://www.newyorkclub.lt/main.aspx?show=about&ID=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Žirmūnai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070530070359/http://www.ketrzyn.mm.pl/~wwmkiewicz/ws/wilno%20plan/index.htm to http://www.ketrzyn.mm.pl/~wwmkiewicz/ws/wilno%20plan/index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070419214137/http://viduramziu.lietuvos.net/etno/etno19a.htm to http://viduramziu.lietuvos.net/etno/etno19a.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.i-u.ru/biblio/archive/jadov_sociologija/05.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071022071806/http://www.paveldas.vilnius.lt/objektas.php?ID=10717&nID=22524&gID=9 to http://www.paveldas.vilnius.lt/objektas.php?ID=10717&nID=22524&gID=9
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071213045926/http://www.dvt.lt/ to http://www.dvt.lt/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified