lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tiberius II Constantine

message: Attempted to consolidate power in the Western empire, may have been the 'Emperor Lucius' of Arthurian legend as described 500 years later by Geoffrey of Monmouth. As this article becomes more developed this should be placed into a folklore section. 71.102.49.157 (talk) 18:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article as it currently stands, is, frankly, a mess. Disjointed, uninformative, filled with quotes that do very little to inform the reader about Tiberius II, it needs a significant overhaul. I will attempt to draft up a revised version over the next few days, so if editors could refrain from editing the article until I have updated the article, that would be great. Thanks. Oatley2112 (talk) 10:23, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - Thanks. Oatley2112 (talk) 23:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of article 

message: Tiberius' policies in the West were disastrous with the empire so over-extended in its affairs - I know there are histories out there that point this out (which the quote by Bury does not go into.) Should be updated to reflect that. 50.111.19.34 (talk) 09:40, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: needs more criticism
Talk:Lists of Paramount Pictures films

message: Actually the Transformers 6 film isn't produced by Pixar Animation Studios! I have looked correctly at Variety Insight Film Releases and Pixar didn't produced that, so please change it correctly. Thank you. 2A02:1810:B406:6D00:95FF:BDCD:8726:AC33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:1810:B406:6D00:95FF:BDCD:8726:AC33 (talk)  
: You're right.  I misread the source. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transformers 6: incorrect producer 

message: Some another movies are not the Paramount films. They're distributing with another movie studios, including Universal. They were separated and divided. Paramount Pictures is nothing to do with these studios. These articles doesn't discuss the studios Paramount does or does not own or the franchises to which Paramount is or is not connected with Summit Entertainment. If sourced properly, would be better served at Paramount Pictures.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.219.68.102 (talk) 14:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it's true anything about Paramount's connection (or lack thereof) to Summit Entertainment, something is not disscused in the article. And the other movies are not the Paramount films. Which films? What sources do you consider about the changes of these studios. That's all. 2804:7F4:C1AA:DBD5:68A9:BABA:62D0:A99D (talk) 14:21, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Paramount films 

message: Can anyone add Hedgehog Films, Inc. and DJ2 Entertainment in the Sonic movie? Both companies are cited in the article. 189.69.75.199 (talk) 13:36, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually dj2 Entertainment. 189.68.93.207 (talk) 20:51, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  - please provide a reliable source for this, the only source in the Sonic the Hedgehog (film) for this is dj2 Entertainment's own website. Fish+Karate 12:06, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: I recently noticed that the list of Paramount films was recently split by decade months back. Upon finding this out, I propose that the articles be merged into two separate pages for films made between 1912-1999 and films made since 2000, as the film lists for 20th Century Fox and Warner Bros. are in similar layouts. That way, the lists can be more cohesive. IceWalrus236 (talk) 17:44, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Conall Crandomna

message: It is stated that "The Duan Albanach has him succeed Ferchar mac Connaid of the Cenél Comgaill".
However the Duan Albanach reads:
"Connchead Cearr, a quarter, renowned in fame.
Sixteen, his son Fearchar,
After Fearchar, inspect the poems,
Fourteen years, Domnall.
After Domnall breacc, of the towns,"
Conall Crandomna does not succeed Ferchar mac Connaid. It is Domnall Brec that succeeds Ferchar mac Connaid in Duan Albanach?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.1.235.123 (talk) 20:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error
Talk:Wehha of East Anglia

message: O'Loughlin appears to try to connect Wehha to the Lombards who lived in Italy at the time and makes the claim that the name Weohstan had no connection to Scandinvia:
:Lindqvist's conjecture that Wehha is a hypocoristic form of the name Weohstan is linguistically not possible, according to O'Loughlin, as Weohstan is a later West Saxon name.O'Loughlin, J. L. N., Sutton Hoo - the Evidence of the Documents, p. 10.
:O'Loughlin notes that Wehha and his father Wilhelm can be linked with a person named Wehilo and his father Weho, who are listed in a genealogy found a manuscript of the laws of Rothari, a 7th-century king of the Lombards.O'Loughlin, J. L. N., Sutton Hoo - the Evidence of the Documents, p. 1.
However, Weohstan is indeed considered to be the Anglo-Saxon rendering of a Norse name. See references in Weohstan. Should O'Loughlin's claim be presented so uncritically as it is in this article?--Berig (talk) 12:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: O'Loughlin
Talk:Wake in Fright

message: I have made a number of revisions to this article (a few when I was inadvertently not logged in), mostly to correct and clarify the plot.  Examples of errors in the previous version: (a) Grant was stated to be English, but I find no reference to this in the script -- he does tell Jannette that he would like to go to England, but does not suggest that he came from there, and no one ever calls him a Pom or Pommy; (b) The sequencing was confused -- Grant has his sexual encounter with Jannette before he goes to Doc's cabin, not after; (c) after Doc's advances, Grant does not wander around the outback as stated, but makes a reasonably purposeful attempt to hitch-hike to Sydney. Nandt1 (talk) 11:49, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Correcting and clarifying plot

message: according to the article - and the cited source - "Jack Thompson yelled back 'Sit down, mate. It is us.'"
however, kotcheff here attributes (a slight variation of) the statement to "another voice", with thompson implied as a witness. my best guess is the author of the cited source got it mixed up. k kisses 17:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Reading that source, I agree. Doctorhawkes (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  contradictory sources
Talk:Wuffa of East Anglia

message: "which instead names his son Wehha..." I thought Wehha was his father? - Jarry1250 [Deliberation needed] 20:25, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I know you added a bit to explain, but i still think it's contradictory: "Historia Brittonum... names Wehha as the first ruler"  "Guillem Guercha ... was the first king of the East Angles ... Guercha was a distortion of the name Uffa, or Wuffa"  doesn't that mean Wuffa's the first ruler? Yours confused, Grandiose (me, talk, contribs)  23:32, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory? 

message: I note that a large part of the article was cut. I have restored the article, which is listed as 'good', whilst retaining the proposal to merge the article with another one. Am I not right in believing that a consensus should have been reached before the article was altered so drastically? I am of course quite happy to improve the text if I am provided with guidance that is a little clearer than, "who writes this stuff?"... Hel-hama (talk) 22:06, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Dbachmann, I notice that after I reverted your edits, you then made edits which included changing the lead section so that it differs significantly from the previous version and removing the GA icon. Two templates have since been added. I agree with the comments made by Grandiose in Talk:Wuffa of East Anglia/GA1 following the deletions you made. We appear to be within a WP:BRD cycle, and I would therefore be grateful if you could explain your concerns more fully than you have in your edit summaries. We can then perhaps work together to reach a consensus. Hel-hama (talk) 20:30, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent editing 

message: A template proposing that this article is merged with Wuffingas has been added to the article. No merger rationale has yet appeared, the Wuffingas article been not given an appropriate merger tag, users involved in the affected pages have not yet been notified, etc.. If the proposer feels unsure of the correct process to adopt, I suggest this link, which might prove useful. Hel-hama (talk) 19:57, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You have misunderstood me if you thought I said all the kings deserved an article, I simply noted that they all do have them - even Hun of East Anglia, who seems never to have existed! I agree with you that there should be sufficient material on a case-by-case basis, as you put it, but the very nature of some subjects is that there is sometimes very little material to go on, especially when the subject is a person like Wuffa who - if he lived at all - ruled a society without contemporary written records. It's fascinating stuff that is of real interest to me. Hel-hama (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Hel-hama (talk) 17:20, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Domnall mac Áedo

message: *Domnall mac Áedo (articlr title) is spelt  Domnhall mac Áedo in the opening text.
*The infobox says he became High King in 624 but the text says 628. 
*The infobox says he reigned until 639; the text says he reigned until his death in 642.
Sarah777 (talk) 17:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *Domnall. The succession box thingy is wrong, but if I were going to tidy this up - and I'll get round to it eventually - it would not say "from 628". Charles-Edwards' furious rationalisation in his piece on Domnall in the new Dictionary of National Biography says that Domnall was "king of Tara" by 629, but that he was removed by Congal Cáech in the early 630s and didn't get back to the top of the greasy pole until circa 635. I would stick with "until his death in 642-ish" and ignore the from when side of things. Just to confuse things further, Dan Mc Carthy's mysterious calculations have Suibne Menn killed in 630 and Domnall dying in 643. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 17:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine. The "years in Ireland" articles do tend to pick these differences out! I guess what I feel is that if, for readability we say someone died in 650 then we should stick with that in articles, infoboxes and "years" articles - with all the 'if and buts' and counter claims discussed as appropriate rather than settling on different dates in different places (or often in different parts of the same article)! In fact when we settle on a date maybe we should discuss the issues and doubts around that date only in the subject's article; and use the 'best' date everywhere else and link back. Sarah777 (talk) 18:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The years in Ireland articles really don't serve any useful function this early on. In the best world they should be "merged" either into the abyss or some big article. You can't make an event fit a date if the sources don't allow it to, and if no date is certain, no certain date should be implied in infobox/succ box usage. I'm sure you agree with that! Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 19:15, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your surety is not well founded. The traditional addition of "circa" or an abbreviation thereof would do just fine. My point is that we stick to a single formulation within and between articles to avoid confusing the reader. Sarah777 (talk) 00:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors?

message: The text herein says the Domnall is the first "Ri Érenn" mentioned by the Annála Uladh, for the year 628.  However, the actual entry, as sourced on CELT, implies that Suibne Menn is the first such:
:U628.3 ... Suibne Menn ri Erenn, mc. Fiachna ...
The annals do mention that Domnall's reign started in 628:
:U628.7 Domnall mc. Aedha mc. Ainmirech regnare incipit.
Is there something that I am missing?
Marcas.oduinn (talk) 08:35, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ri Érenn
Talk:Donnán of Eigg

message: Why is this hidden away Donnan of Eigg  a redlink, with no link here from the disambiguation page at Donnan, and with another redlink Saint Donnan there which should also redirect here?  Don't you want anybody to be able to find this?  If not, maybe it shouldn't be here, we could WP:AfD it.  Gene Nygaard 23:58, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Disgraceful. Good work finding this. Carcharoth 05:26, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hidden away

message: 1. The second story of Donnán says "Another tradition states that a pagan Pictish queen had him and 150 others burnt."
It would be good to add a location where it all happened. The segment is followed by "He is thought to be buried at Kildonan, on the Isle of Arran". I cannot assume that he was killed in Kildonan unless there is a clear clue.
2. The third story says "Eigg is the name of a spring in Aldasain".
Where is Aldasain? This story seems to diverge from Eigg as the location of the martyrdom.
ICE77 (talk) 19:44, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information
Talk:Yuwen Tai

message: I think the name format would be YU Wentai, because YU is his FAMILY name, and Wentai is his given name. Like you say Sun Jihai not Sunji Hai.
And it should be the standard for Chinese's names.
FlyChina (talk) 01:37, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:LCD projector

message: How to setup a ceiling mounted LCD projector
:Drill holes in ceiling, screw in projector bracket and mount projector, use long cables to plug projector into source material and power, grab some trunking pipe
I don't think this article does a good job of describing what part the LCD plays. Is it multiple LCDs? What do they do exactly? 213.100.90.101 (talk) 22:21, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And here I thought LCD projector just a misnomer of video projector. 14:53, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

message: Sorry, forgot to sign
SwissLCD (talk) 16:26, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on LCD projector. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Tag to https://projector.com.bd/
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130204013733/http://www.theprojectorpros.com/learn-s-learn-p-theater_throw_ratios.htm to http://www.theprojectorpros.com/learn-s-learn-p-theater_throw_ratios.htm
*Added tag to https://projectorsfocus.com/burn-spot-on-projector/
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130204013733/http://www.theprojectorpros.com/learn-s-learn-p-theater_throw_ratios.htm to http://www.theprojectorpros.com/learn-s-learn-p-theater_throw_ratios.htm
*Added archive https://archive.is/20101230012621/http://www.avitav.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=187&Itemid=246 to http://www.avitav.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=187&Itemid=246
https://projectorfinder.com/how-to-choose-a-projector  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.46.111.136 (talk) 18:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: A video on Youtube, created in 2018, was added as a reference to this lemma under the title: “Inventor Gene Dolgoff discusses his invention of the LCD projection”.
Dogloff claims to be the inventor of LCD projectors. Although he might have had such ideas as a student, there is no evidence provided. To substantiate such a claim on WP, at least one reliable independent source or a patent granted would be needed as citation. He tells in that video, that he prepared a patent application in 1968 but did not file it. According to him, he included an LCD as light modulator in his design in 1971. However, the US Patent shown in the background of his video has been identified as US5012274A with a priority date of 1987-12-31 granted and published on 1991-04-30. Two patent searches on Espacenet and patents.google.com revealed no earlier patents by Eugene Dolgoff!!
If no additional info is provided to prove earlier work by Dolgoff, I will change the corresponding section to his later work when he was able to build a prototype.--BBCLCD (talk) 08:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History, invention claim by Dolgoff
Talk:Gisulf II of Friuli

message: This article mentions that Gisulf had four daughters and identifies two of them.  I assume the other two are unknown, and if so could maybe be added.  Not ad big deal at all.Redriv (talk) 01:30, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daughters of Gisulf II
Talk:Grimoald, King of the Lombards

message: His capture of Forlì was shameful, however, for he took it on Easter Day, slaughtering worshippers during the festivities.
Isn't this just a bit NPOV. . . ? --Michael K. Smith (talk) 19:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: He died in 671 after concluding a treaty with the Franks and was succeeded by Perctarit, whom he had exiled. [...] and his son Garibald was not elected to succeed him on account of his youth and was deposed by the adherents of Perctarit's cause in three months time.
This paragraph is confusing and contradictory. According to Paul the Deacon in his History of the Lombards (Book V, Chapter XXXIII), Grimoald was succeeded by his young son Garibald as King of the Lombards. When Perctarit returned from exile three months later, Garibald was driven out of the kingdom and Perctarit was accepted as king.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stuart de Haan (talk • contribs) 09:00, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing paragraph about succession
Talk:Ilterish Qaghan

message: Modern Turkish name and modern Russian name were added with this edit. It doen't have any historical value to read historical documents. If you want you can see interwiki: :tr:İlteriş Kağan. Takabeg (talk) 13:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern Turkish name

message: Why does the Kazakh-language Wikipedia seem to have two articles for the same person?
1) https://kk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%91%D1%96%D0%BB%D0%B3%D0%B5_%D2%9A%D2%B1%D1%82%D1%8B%D0%BB%D1%8B%D2%9B
2) https://kk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%95%D0%BB%D1%82%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%96%D1%81_%D2%9B%D0%B0%D2%93%D0%B0%D0%BD
173.88.246.138 (talk) 15:17, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You should ask on Kazakh wiki to merge them. Beshogur (talk) 15:26, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Kazakh Wikipedia articles for the same person?
Talk:Ingvar

message: This should  noit have been moved to "Ingvar Harra" without discussion. "Harra" - where does that name come from? Who knows him by such a name? SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'll reverse the move. UmbrellaTheLeef (talk) 22:02, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

text: The reason I moved it, is that I believed it to be ambiguous, given Ingvar of Kiev and Ingvar the Far-Travelled. UmbrellaTheLeef (talk) 22:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undiscussed move
Talk:Li Jiancheng

message: :I try to apply for deletion. Also try to set the template. I hope that experts will increase the reference source and verify the content.
:British English is not wrong spelling. This should not be the reason for the change, but the reason can be more commonly used in American English.--O1lI0 (talk) 16:06, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read WP:INTREF4.I set the welcome template is to let you read. The template is not an ornament.--O1lI0 (talk) 16:18, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Record
Talk:Geology of Connecticut

message: This article needs some serious help!Jmpenzone 20:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Maymunah bint al-Harith

message: I don't know who put it there, but spelling of the name in ottoman turkish was neither correct nor relevant. therefore I deleted it.
Niyeti bozuk http nesnesi (talk) 00:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could someone explain to me how to link a reference to a full citation? I've tried to do so for the last half hour and it's making me pull my hair out, and I've been unable to find any decent Wiki resource that explains how exactly full citations work and how to get one working with a footnote. The full citation that I want is still in the references section, but not part of the reflist, and if someone could fix it and/or explain to me how it's done, I'd really appreciate it.
Thanks.
Kaos-Industries (talk) 23:49, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help with references - really frustrating 
Talk:Ranks in the Boy Scouts of America/Archive 1

message: If we're going to have an article on ranks, we should probably include Cub Scout ranks as well.  Otherwise, I don't see any purpose to having this article separate from Boy Scouting (Boy Scouts of America). --Smack (talk) 05:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope (and usefulness) of this article 

message: === Merge Board of Review (Boy Scouts of America) ===
Propose merge of Board of Review (Boy Scouts of America) into this article.  BoR is part of the rank advancement process and is peculiar to the Boy Scouting program. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 16:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Court of Honor (Scouting) has one sentence on the National Court of Honor.  What sources do we have?  Should it be a separate article or included in Boy Scouts of America?    --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  19:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Would you elaborate on that please?  I've been planning to add the National Court of Honor to Boy Scouts of America, but I just cannot find anything on its functions.  --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  20:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Article deleted. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  10:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposals

message: Propose merge of Board of Review (Boy Scouts of America) into this article.  BoR is part of the rank advancement process and is peculiar to the Boy Scouting program. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 16:21, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Board of Review (Boy Scouts of America) 

message: Recommend merging Scoutmaster Conference (Boy Scouts of America).  The conference is part of the rank advancement process and is peculiar to the Boy Scouting program. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 18:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Scoutmaster Conference (Boy Scouts of America)

message: As the final step of the advancement process, Court of Honor (Scouting) should be included in this article.  --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  18:47, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Court of Honor (Scouting) has one sentence on the National Court of Honor.  What sources do we have?  Should it be a separate article or included in Boy Scouts of America?    --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  19:40, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Would you elaborate on that please?  I've been planning to add the National Court of Honor to Boy Scouts of America, but I just cannot find anything on its functions.  --— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  20:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Article deleted. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  10:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Court of Honor (Scouting)
Talk:Paul of Aegina

message: Campbell, Brian. War and Society in Imperial Rome, 31 BC-AD 284. London: Routledge, 2002. http://www.questia.com/read/104611833.
The Columbia Encyclopedia. 6th ed. Columbia University Press, 2012. http://www.questia.com/read/1E1-PaulAegi.
Howells, John G., and M. Livia Osborn. A Reference Companion to the History of Abnormal Psychology. Vol. 2. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1984. http://www.questia.com/read/29183316.
Magill, Frank N., ed. Dictionary of World Biography: The Ancient World. Vol. 1. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn, 1998. http://www.questia.com/read/108549065.
Nutton, Vivian. Ancient Medicine. London: Routledge, 2004. http://www.questia.com/read/107508506.
:A lot more needs to be said about Paul J8079s (talk) 05:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography/sources