lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lyon

message: The structure of Lyon is a complicated subject, however the article is about the city which has a population ranked third in France.  Since the metropolitan area of Lyon is not an administrative division, using its population to rank the city in the article is problematic.  The recent edits also removed clarifications on the matter and some info about what Lyon is the capital of, please discuss. Cheers, Vrac (talk) 18:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. Actually, the administrative population is only useful for administrative reasons. Taking account of only this part of the population would give wrong idea of the effective size of the town, way bigger that Toulouse for example. In addition, they metropolitan area is clearly defined for most town in France.Wiiip (talk) 17:19, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population 

message: In my view, only adding a little information in some sections can make the article reach B-Class, especially about Medieval Ages and some buildings such as Tour du Crédit Lyonnais, Tour Oxygène and Tour Incity. Adding a section about festivities is also a good idea. I don't do it because neither English or French are my mother tongue and processing the information from the resources and then composing the text in the article take too much effort for me.
Some sources where I found some information are listed below:
https://www.patrimoine-lyon.org/accueil/histoire-de-la-ville/lyon-medieval
https://www.lyon-france.com/l-agenda/Fetes
https://www.lyon-france.com/Je-decouvre-Lyon/sites-et-monuments
https://www.auvergnerhonealpes.fr/phototheque/755/79-ville-de-lyon.htm
Regards,
--Yolanda95 (talk) 23:37, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think that the article is close to B-Class 

message: Lyon is known as Liyon in Franco-Provençal from Latin Lugdunum Bompanigcc (talk) 02:53, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyon
Talk:Economics of location

message: I do not understand this article. At no point is "economics of location" defined. The example of the six dies dosn't seem to have a lot to do with location, except to indicate that when local demand in insufficient to produce a range of products, a firm will tend to produce just one product, leading to single-product firms in various locations. Could the author (or anyone else) please expand and clarify this article. mydogategodshat 06:55, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Visitor

message: See Visitor (UK Universities) for some of page history. I have moved this article back here as I do not foresee any need to disambiguate this title in an encyclopedia. Andrew Yong 09:01, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the article content, and where Board of Visitors goes, I think Board of governors might be a better target - although there might be an argument for a merger there as well.  David Underdown (talk) 17:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: The link to the privy council lead to an advertising site (www.privy-council.org.uk).  Whether this was an old address or some spammer put it there I do not know.  I have corrected it.
Sat  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satinstaller (talk • contribs) 21:57, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Privy Council Link 

message: In the Jill Paton Walsh continuation of the Lord Peter Wimsey series of detective novels The Late Scholar, Lord Peter is found to be the Visitor of St. Severin’s College in Oxford. It might be a good idea to mention it as an use of the office in the popular literature.
Ceplm (talk) 13:05, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lord Peter Wimsey as the Visitor of St. Severin's College
Talk:The Famous Jett Jackson

message: As an aside, from what I could tell from the show's muddled storyline, Jett isn't a super-agent - he's an actor starring as one. Big difference. Can anyone confirm this? Well, I don't think it'll matter anyway, because this show SUCKS. *hopes this isn't NPOVed* :-p --Johnleemk 09:18, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the episodes are better than others, but overall, it's one of Disney Channel's better series (not that that's saying all that much, mind, but still). Anyway, yes, Silverstone is a show-within-a-show. This is most obvious from, uh - no offense but DUH - the opening credits/introduction/prologue sequence on every single episode of the TV series, where Jett's talking about how he got the show moved back to his home town. That, and the episode where he's set to star in the school's rendition of Shakespeare's Julius Caesar, until everyone realizes that Jett's actually a crappy and melodramatic actor on stage, because as it turns out he usually takes about a million takes to get something right even on film  (this would be one of those "better episodes" I was speaking of, if only for how ridiculously bad he was as Caeser, which was amusing). Runa27 22:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi.  I think the question you answered here, from 2004, was written back when the text of the article itself was unclear on the whole show-within-a-show thing.  By the way, if you have any material to improve the article, feel free to add it.  I haven't seen The Famous Jett Jackson in several years, so to anything more  I would need to research online.  The episodes I remember liking were the one about uncovering the truth about a shantytown fire, and the baseball one with Eartha Kitt. Karen | Talk | contribs 04:11, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've rated this as Start class rather than B because there isn't much info on the characters, nor much detail on the premise of Silverstone.  If someone who knows the show can fill in these areas a bit, I think we're pretty close to B class. Karen | Talk | contribs 00:44, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Jēkabs Peterss

message: Wow! so complex brackets! --Yacht 10:20, Feb 29, 2004 (UTC)
: A little better now. Bastie 09:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have seen the police file in the NRA for Jacob Peters' wife, May (not Maisie) Peters, and her attempts after her divorce to get back into the UK. However, I haven't got the reference, so won't edit now. BobFromBrockley (talk) 14:50, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wife 

message: There is very little on Peters' career from 1922 to 1938 in the article as it is now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.127.7 (talk) 16:28, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is some detail in the box on the right.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.149.30.34 (talk) 16:21, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1922 

message: The date, 1971, for the death of Maisie, seems to be wrong. The article is still confused about the names of the two.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.149.30.34 (talk) 16:16, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  1971
Talk:Eumeces

message: One source (http://village.infoweb.ne.jp/%7Efwic4591/lizard/ejapliz.htm) doesn't have the E. okadae, but has an E. japonicus. This source also given the common name "Okada's Skink" to E. latiscutadus, which looks suspicious.
Elsewhere, the name "Japanese five-lined Skink" is given for E. japonicus.
Some herpetologist should clear up the okadae, latiscutadus, and japonicus mess, please.
Lupo 10:45, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Osaka

message: This section has several lists of tourist attractions.  Inclusion criteria would seem to be that the item is a tourist attraction and it is located in or very near Osaka.  Recently  Tobita  was removed by an editor who was offended that a red-light district was listed in the entertainment category and felt that it shouldn't be listed as a tourist attraction at all.  So it was removed entirely rather than adjusting the sub-category it was listed in.
Wikipedia is not censored. We don't white-wash articles to avoid the mention of things that might offend people or reflect poorly on the reputation of a subject.  It is fairly easy to find sources that confirm that Tobita is a tourist attraction.  While prostitution is prohibited (as a legal matter, perhaps not in practice) it appears that additional forms of entertainment are provided in Tobita.  Many of the entries in the entertainment sub list are areas of restaurants, bars and clubs offering nightlife options.  It seems a good fit for Tobita.  However, after looking at List of tourist attractions in Amsterdam I'm inclined to put Tobita back in a separate sub-list: 'Red-light districts'.
Wikipedia does not exist to right great wrongs. Gab4gab (talk) 12:57, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree with this. It should be a separate category and not just lumped in with entertainment in general. Signed, John Gillnitz 2.0  — Preceding unsigned comment added by John Gillnitz2.0 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of interest/tourist attractions
Talk:Sea of Japan naming dispute/Archive 1

message: The current naming of the body of water immediately east of South Korea is an open issue, according to a 1998 decision of the 7th United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names and a 1974 International Hydrographic Organization resolution regarding the naming of disputed bodies of water .  According to UNCSGN and in accordance with the IHO resolution, the names "Sea of Japan" and "East Sea" are to be used simultaneously.  When the issue is resolved, this article will be edited appropriately.  Until then, downgrading the Korean name for the body of water violates Wikipedia's NPOV policy.  For background on the dispute and a summary of the different points of view, see Dispute over the name Sea of Japan --Sewing 17:20, 22 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I have better things to do than waste my time and energy arguing with a Japanese nationalist. I have added a link at the top of the article to Wikipedia:NPOV_dispute.  Perhaps one day this will truly be a neutral article, but not as long as you are editing it.  --Sewing 21:20, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice
Talk:Heritage tourism

message: Good lord, what a process.  Just wanted to drop Wiki a simple email letting them know that the heritage tourism entry is lifted from Reference.com.  Or the other way around-I dunno.  Exact same article.  
Thanks,
Ankhesenbastet (talk) 18:23, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is taken from Wikipedia. Note the bottom of that, which says
Wikipedia,  the  free  encyclopedia  © 2001-2006  Wikipedia contributors ( Disclaimer)
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Last updated on Tuesday September 23, 2008 at 01:30:11 PDT (GMT -0700)
View this article at Wikipedia.org - Edit this article at Wikipedia.org - Donate to the Wikimedia Foundation 
—fetch·comms 18:27, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re:  Possible copyright issues? 

message: The "Indigenous Peoples" section is very normative (refers to "problems" of heritage tourism, notes that indigenous peoples sometimes don't benefit from heritage tourism "as they should).  Am I wrong, or does this violate NPOV?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.186.111.172 (talk) 14:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Indigenous Peoples" section 

message: Difference between pilgrimage and heritage tourism 117.98.108.107 (talk) 09:25, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourism 

message: I was doing research on tourisme de mémoire (rememberance tourism) which is the French version of the page. However this English page is not the french version. Heritage tourism is different than rememberance tourism... rhe French and English page stand for two differents topics.
So I didn't know how to fix that issue. 37.174.111.233 (talk) 10:26, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong translation
Talk:Frances Bean Cobain

message: Lol jesus christ, can't someone find a better pic that's in the public domain? Dilute13 (talk) 07:37, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I only see this one poor quality one on commons: :File:Frances Bean Cobain Jan 2015.jpg — xaosflux Talk 14:36, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Look at the picture. Change it to litteraly anything else and it would be better than the current one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiwuckylittleducky (talk • contribs) 12:22, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture for real this time 

message: Until we find a sharper, less grainy picture it's best to leave the infobox without one. 
--84.212.23.40 (talk) 15:58, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Got rid of the low quality picture 

message: I love you 92.236.54.89 (talk) 17:08, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music
Talk:Kumite

message: This article needs a rewrite, especially near the end (use of "you" isn't good and especially "I am sure you will enjoy..."). In fact I'd consider this a stub and will now mark it as such.
--Furrykef 15:41, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I thought kumite (before I knew about this term) meant the specific secret tournament in Bloodsport (if it exists) not just a general term for sparring, is that another meaning of it? 71.184.110.64 (talk) 05:29, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: disambiguation needed?

message: I would appreciate a pronunciation hint for 組手 or ku-mi-te, best in IPA-spelling. In my understanding, it should be porounced like "cumite" in spanish, not like "kyu-mayt". ThomasPusch (talk) 11:20, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronountiation
Talk:Ynglinga saga

message: -The historical view, of course, is mainly fantastical. The Germanics were in Germany and Scandinavia during earliest mention of them in Roman literature, long before the Romans had even conquered Italy.
''
-- Where is the proof of that? I haven't seen any proof of that there were any Germanics before the common era. The most probable scenario that I can see is that they left the region around the Black Sea sometime between 700 BCE and 200 BCE; probably two nations just as Snorri described, nations that are represented by the R1a and R1b Y-DNA haplotypes in Scandinavia, while the I1 haplotype is indigenous. I'm not ruling out that there had been a previous incursion by a small band of Celtics who might have set up small kingdoms which the Proto-Germanics later took over.
This hypothesis explains a huge number of mysteries surrounding Norse civilization, Norse language and cultural artifacts that they introduced to Europe.
:The Germanic peoples were most likely the bearers of the Nordic Bronze Age culture and therefore left the black sea region long before 700 BC if that is indeed their Urheimat. Germanic peoples in northern Europe had been noted by figures such as Pytheas since at least the fourth century BC, centuries before the common era. Canodae (talk) 13:34, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Origin of Germanics]
Talk:Ströbeck

message: It's a legend. There is no certainty about details of the fascinating Ströbeck chess history before 1500/1600. --DaQuirin (talk) 08:58, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gunzelin and the like 
Talk:Felix Dzerzhinsky

message: Can we clarify the reason for it? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 18:20, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: All I could find was an ambiguous redirect at Dzerdzinsky, which I moved to the disambiguation page as well, and removed the hatnote. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 17:58, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  hatnote?
Talk:Womyn

message: Hi, seems this page is receiving a very high level of vandalism (quite offensive, also). 
Seems like protection against IP edits may be a good idea?
Cheers :) Caraar12345 (talk) 15:44, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection? 

message: I propose merging Womxn into this article. I think the content in Womxn can easily be explained in the context of Womyn, and a merge would not cause any article-size or weighting problems. Yyannako (talk) 13:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: WikiProject LGBT studies, WikiProject Gender studies, and WikiProject Women have been notified of this discussion. --MikutoH  talk!  02:13, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Oppose, unless given a broader-scope title like Alternative spellings of woman. Although they're conceptually similar terms, Womyn (and wimmin/wombyn/etc.) were popularized circa 70's within second-wave (particularly, trans-exclusionary/radical) feminist circles, whereas womxn only appeared in '10–'15 within third-wave (particularly, intersectional/trans-inclusive) feminist circles. The etymologies and time periods are different enough that I think two separate articles are warranted.The comparative recency of womxn means it had its own separate backlash, with substantial RS coverage. At least based on the current references used, the RS's discussing the two terms also don't overlap significantly, so treating one as a sub-topic of the other (because they're both feminist respellings of woman) could be original research. –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 04:27, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Womxn]] into [[Womyn]]
Talk:Astraea

message: We - in Austria - see "Astraea" as the roman goddess of justice, known as Dike in greek mythology. -- ys Robodoc.at 17:57, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: ...is the mythology that explains that she ruled in the Golden Age up to and into the Iron Age, when she fled the evils of the world and went into Heaven (Olympos-something?)... except: 1. there are two intervening ages: the Silver Age and the Bronze Age, 2. according to the myth, she fled from the evil Bronze Age men Hyginus Astronomica: "Virgin" (Brazen), that Zeus drowned in the Deucalionic Deluge. ... said: Rursus (bork²) 10:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing

message: English 136.158.17.43 (talk) 13:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Astraea 

message: Under the heading "In literature", the second sentence of the third paragraph includes this claim: "...Calderón has a character named Rosaura (an anagram for 'dawns')..." This is nonsensical. "Rosaura" is not anagrammatic for "dawns"; they only share "s" and "a". Can anyone explain? Bricology (talk) 20:43, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "...Rosaura (an anagram for 'dawns')..."?
Talk:Manufacturing

message: I encounter these sentences commonly, and I have a fairly well-developed sense that most casual readers treat this as two scoops of buzzword-compatible word cloud, not even bothering to mentally construct a valid parse tree. 
Such goods may be sold to other manufacturers for the production of other more complex products (such as aircraft, household appliances, furniture, sports equipment or automobiles), or distributed via the tertiary industry to end users and consumers (usually through wholesalers, who in turn sell to retailers, who then sell them to individual customers).
— MaxEnt 00:08, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pedantic sentence 

message: Since 2014 China, not the United States, has had the largest manufacturing production. However, the article listed the United States above China in the top five manufacturing countries. I have corrected the error.2A02:C7E:1CC3:8A00:50D4:6471:B243:9DE5 (talk) 19:56, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the article - which I have corrected. China, not the United States, has the largest manufacturing production. 

message: The manufacturing output figures given for the United States are from 2019 - the figures for 2020 must be out by now. And the figures for Japan are from 2018 - which is absurd given it is now 2022.2A02:C7E:1CA8:CE00:1896:E118:CC65:53AD (talk) 20:53, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The figures are out of date. Badly need updating. 

message: Can we add the EU as a whole to the list for comparison? Newme (talk) 07:35, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add the EU? 

message: It is now May 2024 and the article lists American manufacturing output for 2021 - the figures for some other countries are also out of date, but for major nations the American figures are the most out of date. 2A02:C7C:E183:AC00:60E1:9BC9:93D1:5E30 (talk) 21:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, this article is not protected so you are completely welcome to find newer sources and update it! You may want to use Wikipedia:Find your source (which I highly recommend) to find these newer sources. Lakwat (talk) 17:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manufacturing output figures still badly out of date.
Talk:Imperial County of Reuss

message: Heinrich LXII ? That would be the 62nd, IMHO. Certainly, 17th is meant, or XVII?
:The Reuss's number in a bizarre manner.  They're all named Henry, so non-ruling male members of the house are also numbered.  Basically, all members of the younger branch born in a particular century are numbered sequentially in order of birth, and then it starts over again. john 20:30, 29 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: In one line, they start again when they get to 100; in the other, they start again at the start of every century. Maproom (talk) 01:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree, those should be their own articles. --Chl 14:47, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: "the name of Vogtland .. has remained to this day a geographical summary for Reuss". This is misleading, even allowing for the fact that its "this day" is over a century ago. The name "Vogtland" is usually applied to the district centred on Plauen and Auerbach, which had become part of Albertine Saxony by the end of the Thirty Years' War in 1648. Maproom (talk) 01:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vogtland

message: "After the death of Henry XXIV, the last scion of the younger line, the Principalities of Reuss-Greiz and Reuss-Schleitz will be united." As the article says, he died in 1927, and Reuss ceased to exist in 1920. I have deleted this sentence. Maproom (talk) 01:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1927 is in the past

message: I can't see from this article how the title has passed to Her Serene Highness Princess Anni-Frid Synni Reuss, Countess of Plauen (1992–present), or, more specifically, to her late husband Prince Heinrich Ruzzo Reuss of Plauen (24 May 1950 – 29 October 1999). Does anybody know? Is it relevant? regards Chienlit (talk) 16:45, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Her Serene Highness Princess Anni-Frid Synni Reuss, Countess of Plauen (1992–present)

message: Is it worth noting that one princess was  Avery Brundage's widow? https://www.myheritage.com/research/record-10182-2217290/mariann-princess-reuss-in-biographical-summaries-of-notable-people 164.47.179.32 (talk) 17:50, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: another princess

message: Is there a list somewhere on the Web of all the numbered Henries? —Tamfang (talk) 23:33, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You always have the German family tree here in Wikipedia: Stammliste des Hauses Reuß. Greetings, Mhmrodrigues (talk) 19:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: wow —Tamfang (talk) 01:59, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  grand total 

message: How big (in physical area) is Reuss?
Current news stories about the coup attempt refer to it as a 'small' or 'tiny' area, but no actual size is given in this article. T bonham (talk) 02:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @T bonham: I have entered the area data, both for the entire Vogtland (3.467 km²), which was originally under their control (roughly comparable in size to the county of Essex), and for the parts of it ruled by the Reuss princes until 1918 (1.143 km²). Equord (talk) 17:04, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size?