Talk:Aggressive Christianity Missionary Training Corps

message: I've just pasted this article from my workspace in the last few minutes.  here are most of the sources that I'm starting with.  Never heard of this group before, I just saw it as an article request on WP:X.  I'd love to have other editors input, and I'd love to get ahold of other sources of info.  Thanks! Nswinton\talk 19:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 00:16, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 

message: The article seems to be entirely sourced to polemic, anti-cult sources. What source describes the organization as an "absolutist, military structured, intentional community"? The article really needs to be completely rewritten neutrally from independent mainstream sources. Yworo (talk) 02:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have gone through and cut a lot of the "content." It appears that it was all added by one IP, who I have also provided with a COI notice. eldamorie (talk) 14:13, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

text: National Geographic is generally regarded as a reliable source. If you have some published information that rebuts what was contained in that broadcast, then please provide links to that information. Mere assertions by persons claiming to know things does not trump published statements from reliable sources. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:38, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I edited that section a little bit, because the television program was being used to make a non-neutral point about this organization.  And I acknowledge that a television show on the National Geographic Channel may not have the same reliability and gravitas as something published in the magazine.  However, I do think that, if the episode exists, it is good to mention it in the article- the only reason I can think of to remove it is an attempt to whitewash the article, which would also be non-neutral.  I don't understand the point of the person who said that the information about the episode was 'sourced to a blog...' are you claiming that this television program does not exist?  Surely National Geographic Channel's blog is a reliable source on the existence of television programs that have appeared on the National Geographic channel.  I'm not sure I agree with the wording of the heading, because it seems like a more neutral wording would be possible. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:42, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: POV check

message: When I tried typing "Don Bluth" into the Wikipedia search form (on a mobile device), one of the top three articles it suggested was this one. Is there actually a connection between the two, and if not, why is this happening? A bug in the MediaWiki software, perhaps? 174.30.204.227 (talk) 22:35, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Don Bluth?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aggressive Christianity Missionary Training Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131218054928/http://www.aggressivechristianity.net/articles/Ministry%20Facts.htm to http://www.aggressivechristianity.net/articles/Ministry%20Facts.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article currently states, "The Greens converted to Christianity in 1971." What did they convert from? Islam? Judaism? Wicca? --Desertphile (talk) 23:08, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Converted' from what?