lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Johnny Be Good

message: Is there a reason why people are left out of the cast list (excluding cameos)? @TheOldJacobite keeps undoing my work. The actors I have been trying to add are listed in the credits at the end of the movie. 
MissTofATX (talk) 05:15, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast 

message: The redirect Johnny be good has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:42, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Johnny be good]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:East Tennessee and Western North Carolina Railroad

message: See the talk page for the East Tennessee Railway; I noted some conflicts in dates between those in this article and those in some ETSU records. I don't know which is correct.--A. B. 01:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Lila Rajiva (2nd nomination)

message: :I'd like to see the rule which says that I should mention that.  Besides, anyone can see that the article is being nominated for a second time. Please WP:AGF--Strothra 02:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if there is a rule, but it is standard practice- and no one on this page can see that this article has been renominated. I'm sure you will agree that there is little utility in endlessly debating the same articles. -- JJay 02:48, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not debating it. I am willing to discuss the AfD because, afterall, this is a discussion.  But all users who come to this page see that it has been renominated because they see the large article title at the top which reads: "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lila Rajiva (2nd nomination)" The 2nd nomination part is clearly visable to all users who come to this AfD discussion.  It is also clearly visable in the AfD tag on the main page of the article which tells the users it is a 2nd nomination.  All users should read the article before they discuss it in the AfD discussion.  There's absolutely no point in me stating that it's a second nomination.  It would be simply redundant and silly. --Strothra 02:54, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, in that case, I guess you should continue not to link to earlier AfD discussions such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lila Rajiva. Nor should you attempt any explanation for why it was massively kept on AfD not so long ago, or why we should ignore the earlier debate (effectively thumbing our noses at all those previous participants). Meanwhile, I will continue to indulge my silly, redundant habit of pointing out those sorts of pointless links every time. -- JJay 03:07, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Trina Schart Hyman

message: Hyman was included in categories indicating she's bisexual, and is still included on the list of bisexual people, however, her entry has no source. Can someone please provide a source for this information, or rumor if it's not true? Thank you. LeaHazel : talk : contribs 08:30, 2 March 
2007 (U
I was under the impression that her partner, Jean Aull, was a woman.  Am I incorrect?--Melisandebrat 02:41, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bisexual?

message: Such as Mary Engelbreit publishes each year with more realistically depicted multi cultural children as in Trina’s notecards! We need representational art! She left such treasures to share in as many forms as possible! 24.197.251.55 (talk) 18:15, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Calendar book featuring Trina’s illustrations
Talk:Dance till Tomorrow

message: The plot summery is very poorly organized and may be a copyright infringement with its chapter by chapter breakdown. Wikipedia should not be a replacement for actually reading the manga. Plot summeries should only cover the highlights of the story and not be a blow-by-blow retelling of the story. I'm also tempted to just delete most of the section as it is generally empty and takes up to much space. --Farix (Talk) 13:26, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summery

message: If the cover for Volume 1 is considered fair use, the rest of the covers should be considered fair use as well. The pictures of these volumes are readily used in various sites selling this manga. A chapter by chapter breakdown may be too much, I'll stick to a volume synopsis.
:Please see WP:NFCC for details. I've removed the image again because they violate these non-free use content critiera. --Farix (Talk) 13:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Pictures + Volume Synopsis
Talk:USCGC Polar Sea

message: How come there is nothing about the 1985 incident where polar ice was found to be in breach of Canadian sovereignty?
Bad Performance?  POLAR SEA (yes, all caps for the proper name of a Cutter or Navy Ship) is not reason the Coast Guard did not perform Deep Freeze.  Read a newspaper!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.121.19.13 (talk) 15:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm on it! Tinss (talk) 19:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

text: Done! Tinss (talk) 13:50, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1985 Incident
Talk:Bob Wills

message: George was my father. He played with Bob Wills in the fifties and early sixties. He also wrote many songs. Gary Van Nd the Star lighters was another group he played with. Recorde “Blue Eyed Blonde” , “Rockin’ Too Much” , and “Slippin’ Out”  Debra Petton (talk) 11:50, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Preston Petton (1928-2003)
Talk:José Porras

message: There's only one decision: what title will the merged article go under? I'm not sure which name he goes under more famously.  SLUMGUM  yap  stalk  01:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Logging while drilling

message: Wikipedia is not a directory of service providers, therefore, I am removing the section on companies providing LWD services. —ERcheck @ 01:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Handy Helper

message: I've nominated this page for deletion, simply because I don't think an individual episode of any TV series qualifies as notable.
Yay Mike not being popular...
Maybe consider doing a season-by-season episode guide, as with The X-Files (season 9)?
----
Being an article about a TV episode is no grounds for deletion. Wikipedia has many articles about
TV episodes, e.g., Simpsons episodes. Spacepotato 19:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: wow...OK, sure -MBlume 00:45, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Social choice theory

message: Dr. Nitzan has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Nitzan has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Muhammad Mahajne & Shmuel Nitzan & Oscar Volij, 2013. "LEVEL r CONSENSUS AND STABLE SOCIAL CHOICE," Working Papers 1305, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 15:30, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Nitzan's comment on this article 

message: Dr. Volij has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Volij has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Muhammad Mahajne & Shmuel Nitzan & Oscar Volij, 2013. "LEVEL r CONSENSUS AND STABLE SOCIAL CHOICE," Working Papers 1305, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 20:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Volij's comment on this article 

message: There are many concepts that are conflated in the summary of this article, as well as inaccuracies.  Social choice theory arguably dates at least as far back to the 13th century, whiich is when Ramon Llull described electoral systems later referred to as the Borda count and Copeland's method and other Condorcet methods (citation copied from the current Ramon Llull article: ).  Amartya Sen's work for which he won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1998 likely deserves mention in the summary, but is inserted strangely in the middle of the description of Kenneth Arrow's work for which he also won the Nobel Prize in 1972.  The relative importance (and proper characterization) of Condorcet methods, the Condorcet paradox, Arrow's impossibility theorem, Gibbard's theorem, and the Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem are also hotly debated topics among social choice theorists in 2021.  I may get around to rewriting the summary myself, but I would appreciate it if someone else figured out how to untangle the summary, and make it more accessible to novice readers. -- RobLa (talk) 22:48, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary needs rewrite
Talk:Lexicographic preferences

message: Could somebody who understands what this is about rewrite the example please? First it talks about X, Y, and Z, but then suddenly there are references to B. Also It says there are more items in bundle 2, but unless my basic arithmetic is wrong that is not the case. 72.227.136.130 02:12, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Somebody fixed it in August 2006.--Patrick (talk) 08:20, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite?

message: In a book, I saw the author state that lexicographic preferences relation are strictly convex. However, I think that lexicographic preference relation is not necessarily to be convex, not to mention strictly convex. Although I admit that lexicographic order is strictly convex. 132.206.46.130 (talk) 00:36, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Lexicographic preferences are indeed strictly convex. In $R^2$ the better-than set for any given point is a half plane with part of the boundary included and part not, which is a convex set.--Henriqueroscoe (talk) 05:34, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: convexity

message: This is just a nonstandard utility function, with infinitesimal utilities. It shouldn't be made to look like a nontrivial paradox, it's the usual bullshit you can do with the real numbers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.111.98.212 (talk) 21:09, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonstandard reals
Talk:Cutlet

message: I am from Milan and I don't remember having _EVER_ seen a cotoletta with rib. The name implies rib, but my impression is that it's just a breaded steak or basically any other flat, boneless cut, about half as thick as a Wienerschnitzel, and otherwise indistinguishable. In fact, I think it's a very good technique for passing one cut for another. Considering that the whole article is basically unsourced I'll wait a bit, then rectify based on the dreaded "original research".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.33.106.57 (talk) 17:59, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cotoletta alla Minanese in Theory and Practice 

message: In my opinion, information needs to be added to the 'Austrian cuisine' and 'German cuisine' sections to maintain consistency within the article (all other country cuisine sections have writing in them, not just a hyperlink). Xboxsponge15 (talk) 22:06, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information should be added to 'Austrian cuisine' and 'German cuisine' sections 

message: let's talk about him !
Islamic Republic's bastard pasdar , who famous for Cutlet 5.122.96.125 (talk) 23:49, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cutlets' headed ! ( سردار سلیمانی)
Talk:Adam Kidron

message: This entry should be erased as he is not important, nor does he deserve the attention he so desperately wants.
Although he does deserve to be kicked out of the U.S.A. for helping to Balkanize this country.
(Not my words, just putting it where it belongs)
Niki Whimbrel 02:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from the Article Proper
Talk:David Lloyd (botanist)

message: Thanks to Gadfium for starting the article. Capitalistroadster 02:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gadfium, does Stephanie know more about this? I was only 12 at the time of the trial, but people still talk about it today. It made a huge impact on the science community, especially many people knew him personally. Onco_p53 03:21, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's lots of information on the trial in the second ref I gave should anyone want to expand the article. I think we should be careful that the article doesn't become 99% about the trial. I gather his work was sufficiently important to justify an article about him, and I don't want that to get lost. Stephanie knows no more than this, although she did sit next to Vicki Calder at a conference once.-gadfium 03:28, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Clone High minor characters

message: So, I have a few ideas:
First, I'm not sure if many of these characters merit their own pages. For example:
*"Jimi Hendrix -- Drastically diverges from his clonefather in that this Hendrix clone is closely associated with drugs and the electric guitar"
**It seems a bit too joke-y for an encyclopedia entry.
*"The Brontë Sisters -- They always wear sunglasses, even at night"
**Not really terribly insightful. Also, they don't even have lines. Do they count as real characters?
*Mother Teresa -- Makes a 'teen-slasher-sex-romp' film for the school film fest
**Again, she isn't even shown on sceen ever; only mentionned. Does she deserve to be listed as a character?
I would count the 'Clone High minor characters' as the foster parents, the teachers, and the guest stars. It seems like many of these people would be best served on a page titled 'Other Clones at Clone High' or something similar. 'Characters' seems excessive.
*Update: I'm actually going to revoke this part of my comment. I suppose anyone who appears on screen counts as a character, and "minor" is a pretty good description of their contributions. I still believe their descriptions need to be drastically edited. --Gpollock 05:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Instead of continually edit warring over these, can we please discuss whether they actually appear?  Where and when are they onscreen? Torc2 (talk) 21:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have asked the user this question before but they do not respond. TrackFan (talk) 00:17, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They've been warned.  Hitler has been sourced as appearing in the background of S1E4 at 17:04. Torc2 (talk) 00:27, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chaplin, Morrison, Lennon, and Welles
Talk:Gustav, Prince of Vasa

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support the move to "Prince" with capital p. Oppose other alternatives at this stage. Henq 11:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: shrugs Fair enough. —Nightstallion (?) 10:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Human beings in Buddhism

message: It would help not to flag up articles that are still in the process of being written. Flags will be removed.RandomCritic 02:39, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand your frustration, but if you'd like people to know that an article isn't ready and that you're working on it, you should make that clear. Another option is to work on it in user space and move it over when you're ready. For those of us patrolling recent changes, it's hard to guess intent. Thanks, --William Pietri 02:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

text: As above, I understand your frustration, but if pages weren't tagged when they're new, most would never be tagged at all even if needed, besides, if you think about it, all articles on wikipedia are "being written". Flags merely reflect the state of any given article, and if they have to be removed because they do not reflect the state of the article anymore, well, that's good news for us patrollers :) Equendil 03:37, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please have patience

message: In all other buddhism articles, I can eaily found the sanskrit name of the terms. However, the easiest term seems to be the hardest term for me in mean of finding its sanskrit and pali.
thanks
15.219.153.75 (talk) 16:15, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  please add
Talk:ASD Calcio Club Vittoria 2020

message: :Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
Support. Along with getting the article to follow standard, it will also make the article easier to search for.--Folksong 09:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Wald

message: this article: Roth (onomastics).  The Roth article is now listed for deletion.  Both articles were created by the same user, both are confusing, both are not completely in English... you get where I'm going with this.  I'm going to bring this up at the Roth deletion discussion, and if the consensus is that that one should be deleted, than this one probably should be too.  ONUnicorn 16:16, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Roth has now been deleted.  I have proded this article for deletion also.  Here is a link to the deletion discussion for Roth. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roth (onomastics).  ONUnicorn 16:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

text: I can see that the existance of this page could be justified by the existence of articles like -onym (the situation is somewhat different, but in the same ballpark). The real issue that I see with this article is that almost none of the names listed actually have their own articles.--Mo-Al 18:41, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article appears to be very similar to... 

message: Do all those place names really belong on a disambiguation page?
--Pstevens 09:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not the ones which are not just "Wald", however you should probably look at Talk:Wahl to see what's going on here. Mo-Al 16:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about: we split this page into Wald (disambiguation) and Wald (onomastics).  Then the debate about whether to delete the onomastics stuff can be separated from the need to have a disambiguation page from Wald.  --Pstevens 14:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. ONUnicorn 14:23, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.--Pstevens 12:02, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  All those place names
Talk:Weiz (disambiguation)

message: This does not appear to conform to WP:D. While the content is not, of itself, a game of free association, it does not fulfill the fundamental purpose of disambiguation - to speed the reader to where she wants to go. It's a fair bet the reader doesn't want to go to non-existent articles. It's also reasonable to assume that the reader wanted to know about Weiz, but not in all its weird and wonderful derivations. Grobertson 13:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dealt with per WP:SU – sgeureka t•c 21:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Marnie (novel)

message: The novel "Marnie" is far lesser known than the film adaptation, Marnie (film). This article should be titled Marnie (novel) and "Marnie" should go to the disambiguation page. I'm not sure how to do that technically, but would there be objection to my setting that in motion? Figureofnine (talk • contribs)  13:50, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Rita Borsellino

message: I removed the category mob-busters. There is no "mob" in Italy, only the Mafia or Cosa Nostra. The "mob" is a terminology for American gangsters, it does not exist in Italy. Furthermore, Rita Borsellino is a politician with a very clear Antimafia position, but not involved in busting the mob. - Mafia Expert 21:24, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mob-busters
Talk:Judi Longfield

message: History showed that governing parties in Canada rarely gained seats in by-elections.  However, Longfield entered the race with strong name recognition from her past federal experience.
(i)  My reason for putting this information in a footnote is that I didn't want to clutter the actual article with extensive background information.  Also, "History showed" seems a bit leading (not to mention melodramatic) in this context.
(ii)  Your wording makes it appear that Longfield was expected to win the riding, which she wasn't.
An early scheduled budget announcement was also expected to increase the chances of the Liberal goverment picking up seats, according to opposition parties[13].
There is also some information which suggests the contrary.  On the weekend before the by-election, TVO's Fourth Reading had a panel discussion which argued that the budget would likely hurt Longfield, as (if memory serves) it had nothing for transit services in her region.
It might be best to leave this out entirely.
*Evidence: "Ms. Elliott campaigned largely against Premier Dalton McGuinty, saying voters in Whitby-Ajax were badly served by the Liberal government. Many of the riding's residents commute to Toronto each day to work and need public transit and expanded highways, areas she said the province has not made a priority." (National Post, 31 March 2006)
During the by-election, Elliott and PC leader John Tory campaigned together, while Longfield's ads made no mention of Liberal leader Dalton McGuinty. 
I'm not sure this is significant -- Longfield was re-using her federal ads, so it's hardly surprising McGuinty would be absent.
Elliott won the seat by a narrow margin as predicted.
We should clarify who predicted this.  CJCurrie 03:22, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What I object to in GoldDragon's most recent edit

message: I think that CJCurrie's arguments are strong, but look forward to a response from GolDDragon on this talk page. I encourage both parties to resolve the issue here, and not through edit wars. Ground Zero | t 01:55, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Does anyone know if Longfield has endorsed a candidate in the current Liberal leadership contest?  CJCurrie 06:00, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Leadership race
Talk:Condamine River

message: How long is the river?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.74.44.34 (talk) 05:21, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Question: According to my copy of NATMAP, it appears that the Condamine River flows into the Balonne River well before it gets to Surat. (I have to admit that there's an awful tangle of streams in that part of the world, and it's hard to pinpoint exactly where the rivers merge.) Can someone resolve this for me? 101.175.134.160 (talk) 08:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: According to QLD Globe it ends about 50 kms east of Surat, at 27°3'21"S 149°37'33"E, where the localities of Warkon, Yulabilla and Glenmorgan meet. - Shiftchange (talk) 08:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Confluence