Talk:Moses in Islam

message: It would be sensible to include references to which sura is being described, every couple of paragraphs or so. The reader can't tell what of this legend is actually incorporated in the Koran (Qur'an) and what is the legend that has developed round it.  Wetman 14:11, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is no single verse in Quran that states that Musa went to a mountain and never came.
Quraan didn't mention his death, but according to Prophet Muhammed's talks, Mussa was confronted by the angel of death who at that time appeared when he was about to take people's souls, since Musa was strong, he beat the angel of death, and the angel went without taking Musa's soul.
Then God told Musa to put his hand on a goat's skin, and the number of goat hairs his hand will cover will be the number of years he will live, but then Musa chose to be near God, and he chose to die.
Since then, the Angel of death is invisble. 
This is the Islamic story of Musa's death, and I am sure of it, so plz change the info on the page.
thx
right, but you need a link to a credible source. and remember to sign your post with four tildes(~ ~ ~ ~) 75.72.25.219 (talk) 04:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Musa's death. 

message: The claims about the first borns of Egyptians dying, the son of the Firawn dying and Firawn giving up his defiance is unsubstantiated in Islam as far as I know.  If nobody comes up with references I am going to delete them.  --Abdousi 05:10, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firawn,Pharoah giving up? 

message: I added a section "Musa in Judao-Christian thought" because... well, this should link back to Moses, the Christian version with a little blurb as that article links here.  Granted, I think 95+% of the editors here know him as Moses but, I don't think this should be only about Islamic thought... and yet Moses be about Mostly Christian and then link here... does that seem right?  This is primarily Musa from Islamic thought but from this perspective we acknowledge that Christians and Jews are part of this tradition as well.  Does that seem sensible? gren グレン 08:39, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musa/Moses 

message: This article uses the English "God" frequently and only once uses the latin translitteration of arabic "Allah".  Since "Allah" is the definite article "al" before "ila" (god) it seems to me that the one use of "Allah" could be changed to "God."  Of course, I don't want to change it and start any fights, so I'm posting here first. 05:10, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  God or Allah? 

message: This needs to be merged with the regular article Moses. Since Muslimes recognize the Bible that Jews and Christians use, having a separate article is a nuisance and unhelpful as pointed out by many previous editors above, long before me. What are we waiting for? Student7 (talk) 23:03, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Islamic view of Moses → Moses — This duplicates information in standard article Moses. This is the same Moses, using the same resource as the other two religions do. —Student7 (talk) 23:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Removed my own tag as per information above. changed to merge Student7 (talk) 22:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: :Islamic view of Moses → Moses — This duplicates information in standard article Moses. This is the same Moses, using the same resource as the other two religions do. —Student7 (talk) 23:08, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed my own tag as per information above. changed to merge Student7 (talk) 22:30, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: I notice other articles on Islamic views of Hebrew characters contain lists of the significant references to that character in the Qur'an -- but this article doesn't (and it would be really useful for me right now if it did!). Has there been any discussion to adding a list of significant passages that deal with Moses/Musa? Thanks, Aristophanes68 (talk) 03:53, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See eg Biblical_narratives_and_the_Qur'an#Moses_.28M.C5.ABs.C4.81_.D9.85.D9.88.D8.B3.D9.89.29, which could be a basis for adding such material. Jheald (talk) 09:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If this differs from the Judeo-Christian view, it should be specifically noted somewhere. A pending change to merge is listed above. Student7 (talk) 00:41, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of references in the Qur'an 

message: Title given to this article of such a importance does not seems at all suitable in my view.The topic's start with 'Islamic' does not make any sense as no one search with word 'Islamic' ,it will start with either  'Moses' or 'Musa' .Any islamic fellow want to serch for Musa does not get any where.If any one want to come from Main article 'Moses', he can always be redirected from there, but one if start with search of  'Musa' will not find any serch result ,hence topic should start with Musa  and "Musa( Moses)" is best title possible for the topic ,may pl.agree and discuss further.--Md iet (talk) 06:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title "Islamic view of Moses" 

message: The title is "Islamic view of Moses", so why does the article have all those pictures that obviously depict Moses from the Christian perspective? Images of prophets are forbidden in Islam, so this article should be devoid of any images. 211.25.129.2 (talk) 09:43, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, that persian image has nothing to do with Islam..It does not represent the Islamic view of Moses, so it should be removed. Kiwix (talk) 06:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not censored, so you cannot remove content based on it being "forbidden in Islam." Peter Deer (talk) 19:35, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  We should get rid of all the images of Moses 

message: ?
24.25.237.226 (talk) 02:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the English language Wikipedia and has no control over the German version. You need to go to the German language Wikipedia and ask there. CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 14:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wasn't there a German version of this article?  Where did it go? 

message: * :Islamic view of Moses → 
* :Musa → 
– The article i want to move to Musa is Islamic view of Moses. As Islamic view of Moses depicting the Prophet Musa in Islam so i believe the name of the page should also be depicting the way it is spelled and understood in Islam. While the Islamic view of Moses would be treated as a redirect to the page Musa and Page Musa should be move to Musa (disambiguation). As the Prophet Musa is a prominent figure in Islam therefore majority of the places and names of person are named after Him as also show in Musa (disambiguation) page. So i believe the primary topic should be Islamic view of Moses and the disambiguation page Musa should be moved to Musa (disambiguation). Please provide your opinion regarding the move with justification whether positive or negative. Ibrahim ebi (talk) 03:43, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move 2

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Islamic views on Abraham which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 20:13, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Abraham in Islam which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 14:58, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Once Prophet Moses saw devil (Prophets can see devil) was crying very much. He said, why you are crying? Devil answered because God doesn't forgive me. Prophet Moses said, I ask your forgiveness from God. He discussed it with God, Allah said ok I forgive him but he has to say that I'm not better than human. Prophet oses told devil. In answer Devil said no I'm better, I am from fire and human from soil. 
[User:Mjesfahani|MansourJE]] (talk) 12:27 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 
"family tree with prophets on right" is intended to convey.  It seems to have been introduced several years ago.  My guess is that it's intended to refer to some sort of diagram and is a placeholder of some sort, but is now obsolete.  I'm going to delete it, but if someone cares to restore it, perhaps they could explain what it means a bit better.
Wcoole (talk) 01:21, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visiting devil accidentally by Prophet Moses according to Islam 

message: "God" is a regression of Gotan, that includes a second tree, where one becomes "God".
This is not part of the original Gotan religion, neither Islam.
Gotan though is like Allah, and Ragnarok, Vàlhàll and Hél corresponds to Judgement day, Jannah and Jahannam.
On the islamic side, Allah is not associated with secs, or their sufism either. Clearing this up, the "christian" distortion of a second tree, hallucinogenic drugs, and claims of being "god" has many similarities to the pantheism of the sufis, and may be seen as irreligious conflicts, and really conflicts of sectarian regressions, rather than the original religion, which is culturally corresponding. Which indeed, in religion science, if prophets really talked about the same deity, then it would be so.
I suggest that all articles that deal with Allah, not use the regression "God".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.211.164.8 (talk) 15:06, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  God is not really Allah. 

message: he was a very repectful man  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.110.120.240 (talk) 02:15, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  mussa 

message: Hi, please see Talk:Ishmael#Historicity of Ishmael versus Moses and Abraham. Thank you, IZAK (talk) 18:30, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historicity of Ishmael versus Moses discussion 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Musa(prophet) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 22#Musa(prophet) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 06:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Musa(prophet)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: These are two completely different names. why are they used interchangeably? 
I understand they sound similar, but they're not the same, this is exactly why the author of qoran got it mixed up 121.200.6.85 (talk) 22:00, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Imran and Amram 

message: Majid 39.48.25.128 (talk) 06:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAJID 

message: Some people say it’s Ramses II but this is a bit confusing……………………………………….. Mathsmaster707 (talk) 09:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  But also Who is The Firaun (Pharoah)  

message: The redirect Pharaoh in Islam has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 21:29, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pharaoh in Islam]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: under the "Escape to Midian" and "Prophecy", the Image file of Midian Mountains and Mount Sinai is missing, but the caption and source is still displayed on the page SiWa12 (talk) 10:23, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Repaired. Thanks for letting us know. — Trey Maturin™ 10:35, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Image File 

message: For example, this "His revelations, such as the Ten Commandments, which form part of the contents of the Torah and are central to the Abrahamic religions of Judaism and Christianity." is not a sentence. Kriegman (talk) 18:15, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't understand the point of this paragraph.