Talk:High-heeled shoe

message: I do understand that some have a strong opinion or preference and like to "inform" the reader to such a point that it might be interpreted as talking from ones soapbox. The Wiki style guide is pretty clear on how to do it. So why do I get the feeling that there is text here that was clearly not written from an objective point of view, but rather with the objective to "convert" the reader? Braab 17:51, March 28 2011  —Preceding undated comment added 15:52, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: What section are you referring to? Rudolfensis (talk) 12:42, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Opinionated

message: The included "example" picture, The Vision of Saint Eustace, doesn't actually depict a high heel, but rather a rider with no heel at all who's wearing an extremely long (well-heeled?) spur. Perhaps the editor didn't know what a spur was, or what it might look like, and was thus confused by the mere length of the device.
Robert Graves, the guy who wrote The White Goddess, opines that high heels originated anciently for royalty because their hips were dislocated in a religious ceremony that left them "suspended between heaven and earth" and dislocated at least one hip. The special high-heeled shoes were thus a type of prosthetic aid exclusively used by those with a "holy deformity."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lee-Anne (talk • contribs) 02:12, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical High Heel Picture 

message: I think the section about health benefits should be removed, updated, or incorporated into the 'Health impact' section.
The section references a single study that suggests a single health benefit but is longer than most others. The way this research is presented now makes it seem like it contrasts with the health risks in terms of body of evidence; making the reader think there is strong evidence on both sides. 
However, the whole section is not of equal value. I think it should be mentioned in a sentence or two under the 'Health impact' headline, as it references just a single study — hardly a good body of evidence. Also, the quotes from the author of the study seem somewhat off-topic.
Should I remove/edit it? Yay or nay. Rudolfensis (talk) 12:34, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading "Health benefits of high-heels" section needs a lot of work

message: There is much clear and interesting history of the heeled shoe, including confirmation of its Middle Eastern (specifically Persian) origins, in this BBC article, Why did men stop wearing high heels? .  Can you help add it in?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.49.231.15 (talk) 08:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, although the ref could still be used in more places. Cooljeanius (talk) (contribs) 14:07, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: History source

message: The Wikipedia article states that high heels causes the Achilles tendon to shorten, but the reference's summary states that the tendon thickens and stiffens, while the muscle shortens.  This seems like an important difference to fix, since muscles are relatively easy to stretch.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jbo5112 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't actually only high heels but any kind of shoe heels. Stiff shoe soles also contribute to the shortening of the Achilles tendon. 80.174.254.178 (talk) 17:01, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foot and tendon problems 

message: We need to find a new source for that statement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.53.164.158 (talk) 15:10, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 1 is dead 

message: I compared the given URL with the section that the Copy/Paste tag appears. I cannot see the copy/paste that is being spoken of. I am going to delete the tag for now, but if you can provide more details it would be appreciated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Misha412 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy/Paste Tag 

message: Instead I get told why women do or don't want to wear the shoes and how people perceive them to look on women, how they alter their appearance. You guys should just stick to the facts and avoid opinions. That way the article won't be overly feminist or sexist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.184.19.114 (talk) 09:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Came here to learn about the origins and history of high heels 

message: The site from reference 16, titled: "Glossary of Terms for Women's Shoe Styles", URL: www.sizefitguide.com/shoes/glossary-of-terms-for-women-s-shoe-styles
doesn't exist anymore. Just found a copy of it on WayBackMachine from July, 4th 2010. A later copy from 2011 only contains advertising and the information of the site to be for sale. 
--84.60.114.129 (talk) 09:44, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  site doesn't exist anymore 

message: Nobody seems to realize how much of a hazard these things are when someone's trying to drive while wearing them. Anything over 3 inches or so can cause problems with throttle control and with braking. Extra-large heels can make it almost impossible to panic stop in an emergency. 104.60.70.104 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:29, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There is indeed a scientific paper from Korea about this. It was found that even 5 cm heels lead to greater muscle activation in calves and muscle fatigue in ankles while driving. article Additional to your notes, another problem is that stiletto heels destroy car mats. I don't know the situation in the US. in germany it is allowed to drive in high heels but in case of an accident you could become in part convictable because of wearing not-suitable shoes. By the way, driving in high heels / female driving is also a prevalent kind of fetish (fast driving, pedal pumping, revving...) but it's hard to discuss this on wikipedia due to lack of serious sources. --Max schwalbe (talk) 15:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heels + car = bad 

message: The source cited for the Ancient Egypt subsection of the History section doesn't contain all of the information expressed in that subsection. The source only mentions Egyptian aristocracy and butchers. It does not mention the Ankh-shape in Egyptian heels. 
Additionally, the source may be unreliable, as it does not state exactly where it's getting any of this from. It lists a short bibliography, but none of the items in that bibliography refers to ancient Egypt, and it does not use in-text citations. The one link in the source's paragraph on Ancient Egypt is to another page on the same site, which does not actually contain a single reference to Egypt.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.188.116.39 (talk) 21:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This appears to be an example of Wikipedia mischief where a "fact" is placed in a Wikipedia article and lo and behold, it turns up in "10 things you didn't know about ancient Egypt". I cannot find any reliable source for this history. Pictures of the shoes found in the tomb of Thebes are easily found on Google and they are not "high heels". The information was placed in the article by User:College4you on 5th November 2015 and was the only edit made by this editor. I suspect mischief but perhaps it was a good faith edit. -- HighKing++   12:14, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Egyptian High-Heels 

message: This edit added removable heels to the "Types of heels" section. Aside from the obvious issues that can be ignored or fixed (not minor, spelling mistakes, overstated claims, lack of sourcing) does this belong in this list? Removable heels seems a bit of a stretch in a list dealing with design styles. Perhaps this should be mentioned elsewhere inteh article ... not sure where since the article does not discuss teh material or method of construction. Similar material was recently added by another editor and was removed. I'm going ho remove the new addition pending discussion. Meters (talk) 17:54, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of heels 

message: " High heels are not a modern invention but there is confusion regarding when it was developed. Research shows that high heels can be traced back to ancient Egypt. In the middle of the second millennium BC, Egyptians began to frequently uses sandals. Retention was obtained generally by the Egyptians by a T or V thong passing through the sole. Egyptian butchers also wore heeled shoes for practical purposes, that is, in order to keep their feet clean of any blood while slaughtering animals. "
There's no sources/citations listed for these claims. Also there's no actual proof for these claims in real world. 84.250.157.70 (talk) 18:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. JTP (talk • contribs) 03:01, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2017 

message: Hello! I plan on doing some additional research on this topic. I have complied some sources and I would love any feedback or additional suggestions as I begin compiling all the information I hope to add!
Medical research 
Han D. “Muscle Activation of Paraspinal Muscles in Different Types of High Heels during Standing.” Journal of Physical Therapy Science, vol. 27, no. 1, 2015, pp. 67–9., doi:10.1589/jpts.27.67.
https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpts/27/1/27_jpts-2014-317/_pdf
High heels as supernormal stimuli: How wearing high heels affects judgements of female attractiveness - Paul H.Morris Jenny White Edward R.Morrison Kayleigh Fisher
http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.fandm.edu/science/article/pii/S1090513812001225?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb
Influence of high-heeled shoes on venous function in young women
WagnerTedeschi FilhoMDNei R.A.DezzottiPhDEdvaldo E.JovilianoMD, PhDTakachiMoriyaMD, PhDCarlos EliPiccinatoMD, 
http://www.sciencedirect.com.ezproxy.fandm.edu/science/article/pii/S0741521412001176?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com.ezproxy.fandm.edu/doi/10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005538/epdf
Joseph, J., Nightingale, A., (1956), Electromyography of muscles of posture: leg and thigh muscles in women, including the effects of high heels. The Journal of Physiology, 132 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1956.sp005538.
Current Cultural Significance 
https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2013/02/05/from-manly-to-sexy-the-history-of-the-high-heel/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/in-the-trenches/200909/the-psychology-women-what-is-the-meaning-high-heels
https://99percentinvisible.org/episode/feet-of-engineering/
https://glamorousheels.com/high-heels-types/
http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-21151350
Fashion Victims by Allison Matthews 
Paigee33 (talk) 01:38, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Research  

message: I noticed that the authors and editors of this article have done a great job at keeping it neutral, and not inserting opinions. While reading, i noticed positive points about high heeled shoes as well as negative aspects to the type of footwear. The article was educational without being bias in any way. 
Dresnick95 (talk) 00:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality of the article 

message: Why is this colour distinctive in the Middle Ages? Sign of nobility in Central Europe? Worth mentioning? ※ Sobreira ◣◥ (parlez) 09:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well-colored fashion was strongly limited in the past. Red, orange, pink ... required seldom pigments, for high society accessible only. Since high heels were a sign of being part of this class, they had red colored heels. Why not pink or blue ... good question. I'll ask Bata shoe museum if they have any hypothesis. --Max schwalbe (talk) 14:42, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red heels 

message: I am planning on adding to this article especially to the Medical Research Subtopic. Additionally, I would like to expand the Dancing subtopic as well. If there are any suggestions, please let me know. Ivly12 (talk) 13:55, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi @Ivly12, I think it should be added that the primary cause of injuries (but also the attractivness) of wearing high heels is because of the plantar flexion. I've just added an image that shows this. --Max schwalbe (talk) 11:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Content 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:55, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Basic information to add to this article: what "pump" means in terms of shoes (and where this name comes from). 173.88.246.138 (talk) 18:41, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: I agree with  that this image is inappropriate for the article.  The shoes are barely visible and the rest of the photograph distracts from the article rather than complementing it.  I can't see any reason to retain the photograph so have reverted its re-addition.   please do not re-add the photograph without achieving consensus here.  Thank-you. Wham2001 (talk) 08:45, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey there; i didn't add the photo to the article but also it already existed; Editor-1 deleted it; he deleted photo because of Erotic reason!!! WIKIPEDIA IS NOT CENSORED AND WILL NOT...Editor7798 (talk) 09:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

text: Editor-1! Clearly you are lying...you deleted the photo from fawiki because of erotic reasons; see the reason of him to delete: ... now; user:Editor-1 is banned from fawiki because of WP:3RR and Wikipedia:Edit warring in same article by Ladsgroup...Editor7798 (talk) 09:40, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all it is not deleting,  it is removing, secondly,  I mentioned that "if I have removed that photo in another WP language and mentioned "Erotic", whether it was correct or incorrect, it is not ..."  so I didn't hide it,  but again "whether it was correct or incorrect, it is not related to this WP and this article and these reasons ", judging me per my edit in another article and WP and telling "Clearly you are lying" is against WP:Civility and WP:Etiquette and WP:Assume good faith -- Editor-1 (talk) 11:22, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

text: I'm going to reply to all of the discussion above together. Firstly, what has happened on fawiki is not relevant here, and I would ask you both not to import a disagreement from another language Wikipedia into enwiki – I don't think that's constructive.  Secondly, I don't think that WP:NOTCENSORED is important here: the issue with the photo is not its erotic content, but that it's a poor photo.  Thirdly, I think that this photo is an improvement.  Given the ongoing discussion it might have been more polite to discuss it here before adding it, but that is by the bye.  I would like to suggest two further improvements, though.  First, the photo needs a caption.  Second, I think that it clutters the lead section, which already has a (more appropriate) photo.  Reading the article (which is already over-illustrated) I think that it would go better with the section titled "Feminism", which discusses the sexualizing effects of high-healed shoes.  I think this photo is a reasonable illustration of that, so I suggest that it be moved down to that section.  Best, Wham2001 (talk) 12:09, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I do agree with you, one of the reasons I mentioned in fawiki to remove that bad photo was this fact that the first photo depicts the subject as complete and very well from different angles, that bad photo is also very tall and renders out of the lead section; as the new added photo is erotic per its categories and its content, moving/relocating it to a section about using the high-heeled shoes in the pornography or erotic photography is more relevant, but since such sections are not exist already, moving it to the section "Feminism" as you said is the best approach curently. -- Editor-1 (talk) 13:34, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you agree and there have been no further comments I have moved the image as discussed and supplied a caption.  Best, Wham2001 (talk) 19:30, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph of models 

message: I was wondering if anyone else thinks that the article doesn't read much like a personal essay anymore? I have made a few minor changes, adding in certain citations and removing some emphatic language that sounds more like an opinion than a fact, and was wondering if anyone had any other areas of note that make this article seem more like a personal essay that we could change?
OzziO (talk) 19:21, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the tone of the article is a big problem . I've gone through and done a rewrite of almost every section in an effort to make the tone less argumentative, but I think it still needs a good deal of work. Winthrop23 (talk) 23:40, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article sounding like a personal essay