lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Npa2

message: The original version was too lenient. If you have ever experienced being attacked and abused verbally, you would appreciate that this official policy is there to protect editors and the community and to foster an environment that is conducive to editing. ≈ jossi  ≈ t • @ 17:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although this is not the place to discuss the policy, I agree. This template should be attached with an automatic 24 hour block. Personal attacks make more harm than 3RR violations, and are always intentional unlike the latter. - Eagletalk 00:06, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Too lenient

message: If people are making personal attacks shouldn't we teach by example and actually talk to them rather than slapping on a template? I cannot see the logic behind having a template for this. Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 16:15, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We need this warning, as people that make personal attacks on an ongoing basis, can be eventually blocked for disruption. Without a warning, it is unfair to block them. ≈ jossi ≈  t • @ 17:10, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But my point is - why do we need a teplate to warn them. People are not blocked for personal attacks lightly. If it's seriois enough to warrent a block, then surely it's serious enough to actually talk to them first? Theresa Knott | Taste the Korn 19:34, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here to make the same point. In my experience this template is often used to harass other editors, as actual personal attacks usually get a personal response. I understand that users need to be warned before they are blocked, but they don't have to be warned by a generic template do they? I think these templates should go. --Nscheffey(T/C)</Sup> 04:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why do we need these templates?

message: Per footnote on Template:TestTemplates, templates should be renamed to match the level of warnings. Likewise, , which redirects here, should be renamed to , displacing that template, which will move to .  will be moved to . In a related note,  will be changed to . Any objections? — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 01:24, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: # — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 02:30, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: # Sounds sensible, but a bot would have to subst all the non-subst npa2 templates out there first.  It might be better to choose another name than npa for the correctly numbered templates.  It's a pain but I don't see a good alternative. — ciphergoth 07:44, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose

message: Move has been completed – Gurch 18:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Shlomo Ben-Ami

message: Is he Christian? "My view is that, but for Jesus Christ, everybody was born in sin" http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/02/14/1518230 Pimpalicious 17:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "However, he was not considered to be a hard-liner in Israeli relations with the Palestinians."
-A "hard-liner"? What does that mean? A euphemism? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.69.14.35 (talk) 18:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euphemisms=Weasel Words? 

message: "However, he was not considered to be a hard-liner in Israeli relations with the Palestinians."
-A "hard-liner"? What does that mean? A euphemism? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.69.14.35 (talk) 18:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euphemisms=Weasel Words? 
Talk:Bed

message: "A bed is a piece of furniture?"  Are you kidding me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.245.137 (talk) 16:22, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed??? 

message: I have noticed several UK references to Emporer sized bed.  Is this the "Super-King"?  Should Emporer be referenced on this page for UK? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.22.37.154 (talk) 04:20, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emporer Sized Bed 

message: I was surprised that throughout the whole article there isn't any mention of sex.  Like it or not, it's one of the primary uses of beds, after only sleeping.  Considering that the sexual intercourse article does not mention beds either, how would an outsider (Alien?) reading wikipedia determine where we perform the deed?  Themania (talk) 06:08, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh? There's no mention of breakfast in bed either....or reading in bed....even if you spend an hour having sex everyday in bed, you're still likely to spend 8x as much time sleeping in it - and it probably spends 12 - 16 hours a day empty. So, by your logic, the single most important use of a bed is to sit by itself with no one in it (sleeping, reading, eating, or, yes, even having intercourse) - hey, why isn't a majority of this article discussing that beds spend most of the time not being used at all?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.243.164.201 (talk) 01:51, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  no mention of sex? 

message: The first two links on reference section is broken. May remove them if its okay with you guys — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wk muriithi (talk • contribs) 19:47, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken links? 

message: Shouldn't you at least have where they first where made?    This article needs some help, but it's good so far ---- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.31.25.8 (talk) 22:35, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beds
Talk:Stumptown Coffee Roasters

message: Four cafes and only three addresses. What's missing?
4.242.156.130 17:32, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cafe addresses 

message: The copious amounts of references appear to be for the purpose of self-promotion.  The links to support the third wave coffee movement are misleading: link 2 says that Stumptown may be part of the 3rd wave, this article says Stumptown started it.  Link 3 does not even mention Stumptown at all.
The next section with links 4,5,6,7 are also misleading.  This wiki article does say that Sorenson 'sometimes' pays 3x or 4x fair trade prices, but the references point out that this is not at all normal, these generous prices are for special purchases, not for normal in store coffee.  Further, the quality of Stumptown coffee, which a good part of this article promotes, is not universally accepted... Thus language should be less biased.  Squitringo1234 (talk) 00:41, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References listed 

message: After reviewing the references, I have eliminated the aspects of this article which were clearly self-promotional.  I realize there was a conversation about deleting this article outright; since there was no consensus to that end, I have tried to present the coffee shop in as neutral a way as possible.  
I'd like to note that the shop's roasting, occasional high purchase price of green beans, and attention to espresso is not at all unique to Stumptown.  Neither is the reference to the 'third wave' of coffee.  Squitringo1234 (talk) 20:37, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Entry 

message: *https://www.wweek.com/promotions/2022/07/13/drink-winners/
---Another Believer (Talk) 13:31, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best of Portland 2022
Talk:Environmental impact assessment

message: , Habitats Regulation Assessment is a red link. I know that am being a bit cheeky but I guess this is as good a place as any to call for volunteers. Would anyone here care to write it? (I know nothing about the subject). There are multiple google hits on UK local authorities doing it or requiring it. As a possible writing prompt, there is an advisory paper for airport operators at https://www.aef.org.uk/uploads/PlanningGuide7.pdf Thank you. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 09:18, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Habitats Regulation Assessment 

message: Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
Yes, Environmental impact assessment has an introductory sentence that is very general and explains what the rest of the article will be about. The opening paragraph gives an overview of what the Wikipedia topic is about. Integrationtool (talk) 13:53, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Evaluation 

message: Hindi 2401:4900:1A5A:F38:A3C3:BE2A:8833:FB08 (talk) 13:35, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: Suggestions 197.231.203.101 (talk) 17:33, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Environmental impact assessment
Talk:Signatures Restaurant

message: Isn't Signatures (restaurant) or Signatures restaurant more accurate than Signatures Restaurant (ie, with Restaurant capitalized)?--Wasabe3543 03:58, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: According to the restaurant's website, under "What's New", "Signatures is Closed"
If true, this information adds an important detail to the characterization that the restaurant is under new ownership and looking for a new name.
: Attempting to go to their website now results in nothing other than Bad Request (Invalid Hostname) being displayed.  This would seem to confirm their being closed. TerraFrost 04:04, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Status?

message: The second paragraph has links to other Abramoff businesses: Archives Restaurant and Stacks Delicatessen. The first shows up red, denoting no article; the second links back to this (Signatures Restaurant) article. a Search of this article for "Stacks" yields "Not found." Perhaps it should be red, too.
Donfbreed (talk) 23:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Circular-Link Problem
Talk:527th Space Aggressor Squadron

message: I've done the move, automatically replacing the redirect.  Incidentally, dates that include [day month] [year]should always be completely wikified so that user's preferences can take effect. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 17:06, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge done, & dates 

message: July 1977-July 1980  Bwmoll3 (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: I was assigned to this squadron

message: The current lead completely omits the squadron history prior to its designation as a Space Aggressor Squadron. --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: The emblem for this squadron has been updated following its transfer to the USSF. The old one should be moved elsewhere since it is historical. Usaf2222 (talk) 20:55, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emblem Update
Talk:Cheap Trick (1977 album)

message: Is this song a reference to Electric Light Orchestra?--Richy 18:02, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ELO Kiddies

message: This is the exact same page as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheap_Trick_%281997_album%29. One album doesn't need two pages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.71.212 (talk) 02:38, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete This Page
Talk:A Wild Sheep Chase

message: The last section on the page, Book Information, dates the English publication as occurring in October 1989; the sidebar on the right says December 31, 1989. (Since the Japanese pub date is directly above that and it took place in October 1982, perhaps this led the date to be misread.) — Rsperberg (talk) 04:16, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: English publication date discrepancy
Talk:Garbage collection (computer science)/Archive 1

message: The latest anonymous IP editor seems to have misunderstood the intent of the sentence they changed. I'll see if I can reword it better. --Deco 05:20, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: Does BASIC have garbage collection or does Visual Basic have garbage collection? If it's the latter, I think it should be emphasized in the article.  --Silver hr 05:32, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  BASIC's gcing 

message: A collection cycle can occur at any time and can require an arbitrarily long amount of time to complete.
A collection cycle will only occur at a point where the program allocates dynamic memory, or when the program explicitly invokes garbage collection.  It will not occur "at any time".
A collection cycle will not take an "arbitrarily long time".  If we ignore environmental issues (e.g. VM paging, time-slicing), the time taken by a collection cycle is a typically a linear function of  1) the number of live objects, 2) the number of bytes of live objects, 3) the number of pointers in live objects, and 4) the number of dead objects.
All of these numbers are bounded by the program's heap size.  (For a copying or generational collector,  you can ignore 4.  For a non-copying, non-compacting collector you can ignore 3). --Anon
I should hope a typical garbage collector does not collect only when forced to or explicitly requested to. Process images would grow very large. This is only really acceptable if it's a machine-wide garbage collector. "Arbitrarily long time" isn't exactly true (indeed, every terminating program's runtime is trivially bounded by the number of machine states); more accurate might be "can cause a noticable pause that interrupts time-critical events". --Deco 03:01, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collection cycles
Talk:Franny Beecher

message: and heard "Beecher's boogie woogie" played by Nick Nastos/Masters  :-)   Stephan KŒNIG 18:16, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, that was "Guitar Boogie Shuffle" by Arthur Guitar Smith. For some reason Haley called it Beecher Boogie Woogie when Franny performed it, but it's the same song. 23skidoo 19:38, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Saw the Comets in Liège, Belgium back in May 1974

message: (Moved from Talk:Jodimars 23skidoo 15:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not know which if any Tyrones recordings Beecher performed on. I do believe, however, that he plays on "Blast Off" as there's a similar guitar line to that heard in the 1957 remake of "Rock the Joint" the Comets did. 23skidoo 15:07, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tyrones question

message: Beecher's passing was announced via his official Facebook page last night. At the moment there is no media coverage to cite as it occurred late last night after deadlines. It has been verified directly with the family, but that of course constitutes Original Research. 68.146.70.124 (talk) 12:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's done -- he's listed as deceased. Quis separabit? 21:28, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Death
Talk:Business process interoperability

message: Just from a basic viewpoint, I think that the concept of Business Process Interoperability is much wider than just minimising human labour involvement. This article is focusing on a subset of the entire BPI range of possibilities. Is the single definition that we have on this article really an accepted maximum scope by most people. From reading a few of the references it seems that the overall possibilities may have the minimisation criteria as an end product, but they don't even mention it as a defining factor. Ansell 03:35, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: I have made two changes as a start to give this article a more general focuss. It seems "Business process interoperability" is an emerging concept since the 1990s. A lot of the current content, however, seems like original research. Take the previous first sentence for example: 
:Business process interoperability (BPI) is a state that exists when a business process can meet a specific objective automatically utilizing essential human labor only...
I can't seem to find one single reliable source (on Google books) linking "Business process interoperability" to "human labor". Same with "Business process interoperability" and "to meet objectives"
It think there is no doubt that "Business process interoperability" and even more "process interoperability" is a notable subject, that deserves a good wikipedia representation. It seems like a good thing to just remove these kind of questionable remarks, and bring some reliable sources into this article. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 22:42, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research 
Talk:Fuzion Frenzy

message: Is there any information from the game developer that supports that claim that Zak is the weakest character or that Sampson is the strongest? From all the information I've been able to gather it seems that all of the characters possess equal skill in all areas and any difference between them is purely cosmetic. I think the ranking of the characters needs to be removed.
FUZION FRENZY  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.210.41.11 (talk) 07:06, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Card stunt

message: Card stunts, w00t?! ---Bobak 18:20, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Dangnabit, I've forgotten...there's an advert going round England's TVs at the moment, with the card stunt depicting a bottle of beer and a glass, and the cards are flipped several times to show the beer being poured in an arc into the glass...Lady BlahDeBlah 14:48, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beer advert 

message: I'm guessing the WLCS name was an advertising slogan? I am not sure it could be justified as a simple description, as I'm sure some of the North Korean ones have more than 118,000 participants given that the Pyongyang stadium's capacity is 150,000. 81.159.58.45 (talk) 15:12, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gillette "World's Largest Card Stunt" 

message: Why is that picture here? That isn't a card stunt..... That's just how the seats are painted
130.15.56.25 (talk) 23:37, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: well spotted. I've removed it for you! :-) EditorInTheRye (talk) 23:44, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bristol Motor Speedway 

message: There’s a Thai noodle call mama(มาม่า) and If my calculations are correct, in 1993 a commercial for mama pork flavor noodle depicted card stunt showing words like
“เสียงสับหมู(pork chopping sound)”or “หอมหมูสับ(Fragrant smell of minced pork)”.
Here a link”Youtube.com/watch?v=aOhbjldXzsg” 87.254.87.44 (talk) 16:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noodle advert
Talk:Omega-9 fatty acid

message: I think this article is way overdue for a lot more expansion, for example, more about how Omega-9 fatty acids affect the body and their role in nutrition. I have no expertise in this topic but hopefully someone will step forth and turn this into a worthy article along the lines of the article on Omega-3 fatty acid. Chrysolight (talk) 02:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: The person who marked this for expansion didn't have any particular requests.  I hope my cleanup and additions fit the bill.  Sorry for not giving my edit summary.  David.Throop 18:21, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 

message: Why would the faux-EFA process occur especially in vegetarians? Is it the lack of the long-chain w3s? If so, wouldn't the presumed abundance of LNA in the vegetarian diet compensate for this? Frankg 03:31, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the cited article by Phinney; it addresses this question.  Briefly, he speculates that, since vegetarians get essentially no dietary long chain PUFA, the desaturation and elongation pathways are "wide open" and a certain amount of the ω-9 oleic acid goes down the path.  Even more goes down the path under EFA deprivation because the body is making even more of the elongase and desaturase, plus there's no linoleic or linolenic acid to act as a competitive inhibitor.  Phinney says that the Mead acid doesn't serve any particular physiological purpose.  It's just a relatively low-cost side effect of a necessary process. David.Throop 16:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chain Elongation in Vegetarian diets 

message: what are the side effects? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.94.205.100 (talk) 10:53, June 2, 2006
:Phinney reports no side effects to the production of mead acid in vegetarian diets.  We can speculate that it may have some interference with the action of the lipoxygenase, COX-1 and -2 enzymes on EPA and AA. David.Throop 17:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Side effects 

message: There seems to be no justification for having an article on this topic.  Omega-9 fatty acids do not seem to have any common distinguishing property, chemical or biological, other than having ONE of their double bonds in a particular place.--Jorge Stolfi (talk) 17:10, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article does not seem to serve a useful purpose
Talk:Captain Victory and the Galactic Rangers

message: I believe this was the first creator owned comic book published by at least a semi-major label.  That should deserve some mention I think...  Aapold (talk) 19:11, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't that distinction go to Destroyer Duck? At any rate, either way, I agree - it's worth mentioning. Macduff (talk) 23:20, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creator Owned 

message: The article says Captain Victory didn't appear again until Topps, but CBDB.com lists a 3 pg story in Anything Goes, December 1986.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.189.112.51 (talk) 00:02, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Appearance? 

message: The Info Box only lists the dates, issues, and creative team from the original Pacific Comics run.  But it looks like there is now a new, continuing reboot/revamp title of the same name.  So how should that info be included?  And should the Topps and the Kirby:Genesis info be included? Macduff (talk) 23:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info Box 
Talk:Information silo

message: Please comment here on the merge proposal. DFH 11:04, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: Consider adding references / merge with stovepipes (in organisation, information, or hierarchical contexts).   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.255.45.53 (talk) 21:20, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stovepipes
Talk:Goulburn River National Park

message: Why do you insist on removing the animals? Jakken 18:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On what basis are you adding them? Are you simply listing well-known Australian animals in the hope that they are actually notably present at Goulburn? Please cite your source.--cj | talk 11:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, please don't mark reverts as minor edits.--cj | talk 11:13, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

text: And you have no reason to be a jerk about it †Jakken† 01:07, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Animals
Talk:Mu (rocket family)

message: The article doesn't match with History of Japan Space Research.  I'm not very knowledgeable of the history and nomenclature of ISAS rockets, so I'll just put memorandum here.
* The Article says Mu-1, when it should be L-4S.  But the first of the L (Lambda) series rocket (L-3-1) was launched to suborbit in 1964.
* The Article says In 1971 (after a launch failure in 1970) the first Japanese satellite was launched with the four-stage M-4S rocket.   Whereas the first Japanese satellite Ohsumi was launched in 1970 by L-4S-5.
* First satellite launched by Mu rocket (Mu-4S-2) was Tansei in 1971, after a failure of Mu-4S-1 in 1970.
--Fukumoto 18:27, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article

message: Needs more stuff on the MUSES probes. 70.29.212.131 (talk) 13:51, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Mu Space Engineering Spacecraft]]
Talk:Tan Chee Khoon

message: My research has turned up a big fat nil on his personal life. I don't even know who his wife is, or how many children he had. Anybody got a clue? Johnleemk | Talk 18:33, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal life

message: It's showing up as only "a" with no citation.  I'm not sure where it belongs but I believe it's just a typo or something.  My attempts at what I thought it should be failed. gren グレン ? 21:02, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd Ref 