lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stix Baer & Fuller

message: Hey I am Dillon Quinn Jr. I'm wondering why STIX BAER & FULLER is closed.Could you tell me why? 2600:4040:5E99:E800:ACBF:B297:6E05:E531 (talk) 01:25, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  IT IS CLOSED FOREVER 

message: Stix Baer and fuller opened on 1892 and closed on 1984 2600:4040:5E99:E800:ACBF:B297:6E05:E531 (talk) 01:27, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Location are in river roads mall st. Louis mo and chesterfield mall chesterfield mo 2600:4040:5E99:E800:ACBF:B297:6E05:E531 (talk) 01:30, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: So stix Baer and fuller jingle radio 1962 is crazy man. watch it if you dare! 2600:4040:5E99:E800:ACBF:B297:6E05:E531 (talk) 01:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stix Baer and fuller jingle is weirrrrrddddddd
Talk:St. Louis Fire of 1849

message: "While Captain Targee was heroic, he was NOT the first fireman killed in the line of duty in the United States. Many had perished before the St. Louis White Cloud fire of 1849 . Peter Roome, Foreman of Hudson Engine Company No. 1 in New York City was beaten by British soldiers as he attempted to direct his men in battling a fire during the British occupation of New York in 1776 during the Revolutionary War. He died of injuries suffered in the line of duty. Numerous other New York firemen were killed years prior to Captain Targee. In 1811 Foreman William Peterson of Engine 15 died from "over exertion and exposure to heat." Charles Abrams, Engine 18, was killed at a fire on Broadway in 1820. Firemen David Raymer, Engine 40, and Assistant Foreman Francis Joseph, of Engine 1, were killed in 1827. John Knapp of Engine 32, was killed by a falling wall in 1834. Four months later Eugene Underhill and Francis Ward, of Engine 13 were killed in a wall collapse. In 1845 an explosion of salt peter during a general alarm fire devastated the New York Volunteer Fire Department, killing several firemen and destroying numerous pieces of apparatus.   See thevolunteers1830-1865.com"
Removed this from the main article, it doesn't belong there.  It was posted by an anonymous editor; website is an advertisement for a book (a novel).Squad51 03:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Redline (1999 video game)

message: Anyone else reading this that played on MPlayer?  Terminator, Hillfiggy?  XP?  Mathiastck 17:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You might not know me, but I played back on MPlayer too. I'm suprised people are still alive after this. I still run a fan site, but it's been outdated for ages. Xanarki 01:24, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the link to fan site! Mathiastck 06:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TCK? 

message: Removed reference to Fantasy Flights role playing game of the same name. There isn't any verifiable evidence given that the rpg has any connection to the computer game and they only resemble each other on a superficial level. See WP:V. MrDenton (talk) 16:50, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FFG
Talk:Requiem: Avenging Angel

message: The problem with Leviathan is not that humanity could reach Heaven, but rather that they'd be able to breach the barrier from Creation to Chaos, which would turn the millions of cryogenically frozen humans into millions of hell-demons, which would be used by the Fallen to storm Heaven. I don't know how to insert it into the article, or if that would be allowed at all, since it's probably original research.--Cyberman TM (talk) 14:46, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot: Leviathan - not quite correct

message: hooray!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetechwizard21 (talk • contribs) 18:18, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The game is back on GOG
Talk:Noel (film)

message: I've added a number of maintenance tags to this article for the following reasons:
* There isn't a single cited reference in the whole article.
* The tone is often inappropriate (example: "Noel is a perplexing and mystifying Christmas movie ..."), and the article in general is just poorly written (example: "Meanwhile, a jealous cop (Paul Walker) with a pretty and pregnant fiancée (Penélope Cruz) assaults her gay tree-decorator friend and has a mysterious encounter with Artie (Alan Arkin), an older man running a restaurant who seems to know him.").
* The lead-in to the article is basically a plot summary, yet there is another, overly-long plot summary under the "Plot" heading.
* There are no "Production" or "Critical reception" sections.
* No mention of the notable fact that this film was simultaneously released in theaters, on cable TV, and as a Flexplay disc (as far as I know, this is the only film to date that has been released in this manner).
Simply put, this article needs a lot of work.  Tdogg241 (talk) 18:11, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Never Die Alone

message: http://web.archive.org/web/20040503211749/http://www.qctimes.com/internal.php?story_id=1026372&t=Art,+Movies,+Theatre&c=4,1026372
This might help develop the article.
WhisperToMe (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review from ''[[Quad City Times]]''
Talk:Saving Silverman

message: this is only known as saving silverman within the US. in the dozens of other nations it was released in, its called 'evil woman'. shouldn't that be the title of the wikipedia article then?
--CLICK SIGN YOUR NAME
:*Reasonable question, but country of first release or country of production typically determines Wikipedia movie title, and IMDB title, too. --Lexein 14:56, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate title 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lexein#Why_I_edit_movie_articles - Lexein (talk) 05:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I changed stuff 

message: Trimmed the Plot section again, and will continue to shorten it further. It needs to be restructured to address the several intertwined action threads.  Please add non-plot (character development, themes) in a separate section. --Lexein (talk) 21:13, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the... 

message: This is the second film that Jason Biggs and Amanda Detmet work together after co starring in the film Boys and Girls.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.248.184.32 (talk) 18:57, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: The Taming of the Shrew did it better, but if you can get past the inherent violence, the characters are somewhat charming in their emotional helplessness.  I guess the reason it hasn't been analyzed from Shakespeare's perspective is that it is such a bad movie.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 04:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beat her til she says yes
Talk:Blastulation

message: is the blastula the same as the blastocyst?  if so, should be merged.
The blastocyst is not mammalian blastula. Blastocyst is specific stage appeared in placentals mammalia in order to form the sphere imitating the yolk. Placentals lost the yolk in their eggs but the scheme of morphogenesis is the same as in reptiles and prototeria (and homologious to well-known bird's development). The blastula of all Amniota (reptiles, birds and mammals) is discoblastula and is formed on (or under) a sphere (yolk or trophoblast). 95.25.161.153 (talk) 16:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Early discussion

message: Why study whitefish in particular, as opposed to, say, haddock?  Wanderer57 (talk) 12:44, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it's due to cell size, easier to view chromosomes 205.250.72.250 (talk) 09:19, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitefish 

message: I can't believe that whoever worked on this article previously left it hanging with so many question marks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.184.248.6 (talk) 13:23, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  If you're an expert on this subject, please elaborate and make this article substantive. 

message: Our group has expanded this article greatly through addition of sections on development and structure as well as clinical implications.  The introduction has been expanded to give a broader sense of the blastula's place in embryonic development. Mannintg (talk) 16:59, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Educational Project

message: Did you know that you did not start out as a blastula?  First you were a zygote, then a morula, then, when the blastocoel formed, you became a blastula.  See the lead of blastula.  --108.45.72.196 (talk) 03:29, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The beginning of human personhood remains subjective. In hindsight, it would have been better to say you "... that you were once a blastula" or something to that effect.  Smallman12q (talk) 18:39, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you think you could tweak it a bit?  We don't want to mislead anyone.  It brought 6k 3k views to the page and that's a good thing—you know—knowledge is power and all that.  (On the personhood question:  it's a shame it remains subjective for so many people when the answer is so blindingly obvious.)  --108.45.72.196 (talk) 15:44, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did you know? 

message: An early discussion on this page began and was answered as follows:
::is the blastula the same as the blastocyst? if so, should be merged.
::The blastocyst is not mammalian blastula. Blastocyst is specific stage appeared in placentals mammalia in order to form the sphere imitating the yolk. Placentals lost the yolk in their eggs but the scheme of morphogenesis is the same as in reptiles and prototeria (and homologious to well-known bird's development). The blastula of all Amniota (reptiles, birds and mammals) is discoblastula and is formed on (or under) a sphere (yolk or trophoblast). 95.25.161.153 (talk) 16:03, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification required
Talk:Ring (video game)

message: As far as I remember the game, Siegmund, Wotan's son, is Siegfried's father, as he is in the Opera.
He is brother and lover of Sieglinde, who is NOT Brünnhilde.
Brünnhilde, the Valkyrie, is indeed Siegmund's (half-)sister who rescues Siegmund.
Again, this is according to Wagner's "Walküre".
Siegfried does not appear at all in "Ring". He is the main character
in "Ring II". (where he is indeed, again according to the Opera, betrayed and killed.)
So the game is way more faithful to the opera(s) than the article implies.
Could someone with access to the game verify and change this accordingly? --megA 23:22, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Siegfried and Siegmund: Son and Father! 
Talk:The Jacket

message: I'm baffled by the absence of any official credit to Jack London. Early press accounts of the film, while in preparation, which unfortunately no longer seem to be available on the web, said flatly that Clooney and Soderbergh were making a film of the Jack London novel. The project was delayed for some years. 
Jack London's novel would seem to be so uncinematic as to be unfilmable, so it's not surprising that the current film bears very little relation to the novel. However, the central device of a person who experiences discorporeal time-travel while strapped into an intolerably-tightly-laced straightjacket is so specific and peculiar that it deserves mention. Since
:"Although uncredited, key elements of the film's story may be based on this novel."
was removed a speculation, which it is, I've replaced it with the simple statement of fact that the novel is
:about a prisoner who undergoes discorporeal time travel while being tortured in a compression jacket,
leaving it to the reader to decide whether that element of the movie is related to the novel. Dpbsmith (talk) 21:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Come il vagabondo delle stelle di Jack London, dalla sua postazione l'uomo comincia a viaggiare nel passato, poi nel futuro. 
Even I can translate that as "like Jack London's Star Rover." Babelfish says "Like the wanderer of stars of Jack London, from its emplacement the man begins to travel in the past, then in the future." 
A user comment in a French web forum says "Inspiré semble-t-il en partie du vagabond des étoiles de jack London..." = "Inspired seems it partly of the vagrant of stars of jack London." Just a user comment, but interesting. Dpbsmith (talk) 21:40, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''The Jacket'' (Jack London novel)

message: "The morgue drawer that Jack is imprisoned in acts as a metaphor for death."  This needs a citation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plumlogan (talk • contribs) 16:09, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  THEMES
Talk:Robopon Sun, Star, and Moon Versions

message: Some websites list "Robopon: Star Version" as an equivalent to "Robopon: Sun Version" (much like the Pokemon Red and Blue/Diamond and Pearl releases). However, I cannot find boxart for it. Does anyone know anything about this game and whether it exists? --Zooba 20:08, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Robopon Sun is indeed a counterpart to Robopon Star (and Robopon Moon, if memory serves), but only Sun was ever released in English. That may have something to do with it. Pythagorean * Hypotenuse Man 20:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I recall hearing about the Moon version. Is it the same as star and sun like with Pokemon Red, Blue, and Yellow? Evaunit♥666♥ 01:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To the best of my knowledge. Pythagorean * Hypotenuse Man 00:16, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: have you seen anywhere on the internet with a lot of info on the series? i cant seem to find anything too useful. Evaunit♥666♥ 01:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, most of my knowledge came from the GameFAQs forums, so any links I might have found - it's been a while - have been lost to the ages. ^^; Sorry. If it helps, though, the actual name of the game, in Japanese at least, is Robot Ponkottsu: Moon Version. Pythagorean * Hypotenuse Man 23:57, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: thats alright, thanks anyway! its weird that theres so little info on these games tho. Evaunit♥666♥ 02:02, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just finished updating the article with the 3 standard versions of the game, I don't have the time to write a compatibility guide for them yet, and there is already a fairly good guide for "Sun", that I used as reference on the article. The Japanese versions, can trade among themselves but won't trade with the USA version, so it seems the only way to get all the Robopon in the USA version of "Sun" is probably with GameShark, or Game Genie codes. I also removed the Evaunit</b>]]♥666♥ 19:57, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robopon: Star Version
Talk:The Rookie (2002 film)

message: I deleted the line "After making his MLB debut, the film shows him giving the game ball to his dad. In reality, he never did. Morris has consistently had a poor relationship with his father." The commentary track on the DVD claims he did in fact give it to his dad. If this is to be reinstated, it needs to be referenced. I also deleted "The deal involving the Owls reaching the District Playoffs was never a real deal but a joke among the players. 3 teams per district could move into the play-offs and only 3 schools in the district Reagan County was in, at the time, had baseball teams. Thus every team in the district moved into the play-offs, regardless of their win-loss record." The deal described in the movie is not that the team should reach the playoffs, but win them, and surely only one team at a time could do that.--Barend (talk) 14:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy with commentary track of DVD of movie. 

message: What hand does Dennis Quaid use dominantly? Jim Morris, the character was left-handed, so Quaid had to throw with that hand, but is he actually left-handed? Or did he practice using his left-hand when he was really right-handed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.14.217.129 (talk) 19:44, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter. If you check out 61*, you'll see that left handed pitching is easily filmed by reversing the uniform and filming the mirror image. MMetro (talk) 12:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dominant Hand?
Talk:The Wraith

message: It's obvious from just watching the movie that at least one replica shell was made for a head on crash. The car disintegrates on impact, there's nothing left but chunks of fiberglass and the wheels can be seen mounted to minimalistic, lightweight 1" square tube frames. Such stunts are done by pulling one or both cars with cables connected to a powerful truck off-screen.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzybody (talk • contribs) 07:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: M4S replica

message: He is the driver of black car :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.176.192.47 (talk) 10:55, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stig
Talk:Thirteen Ghosts

message: Umm... there's no cast member list for this film.
The term is Welsh on a bet not Welch.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.251.52.214 (talk) 01:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm correcting a couple of things in the article; mainly, the fact that the year is which the Pilgrim woman arrives in New England is actually 1675 as mentioned in the DVD commentary for the film, not 1695.  Plus, there is a minor grammatical error or two in the article; otherwise, good job! Informed Progressive (talk) 20:22, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections 

message: There is no information in this article on the film's production. This should be added to the article in order to completely cover the film.--Paleface Jack (talk) 21:57, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Production Information 

message: "Although it features occult themes, it is not, stylistically, a horror movie." according to whom?
"fantasy action film directed by Steve Beck." Fantasy action? 
All of this seems like original research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.220.26 (talk) 08:41, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not stylisticly a horror film? Fantasy action film?
Talk:Tower of Terror (1997 film)

message: I'm not interested in starting a revert war, but I linked to a clip from the movie showing the girl giving the old woman a gold necklace with a heart locket. If you think she gave her something else, fine, but you need to say what that thing is (and cite a source). I'm trying to help people find information that I had a hard time finding myself. I understand if you want to make the quiz harder, but I think you should at least be honest about your intentions, rather than making the unsourced claim that the gift is something other than a necklace. (You have so far conveniently avoided saying what it is, by the way.) Kyleferguson2 (talk) 02:31, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Oh, boy! I hope Walt Disney Pictures teams up with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer and Blumhouse Productions to make the new theatrical film adaption!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.79.235.169 (talk) 18:48, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney/MGM/Blumhouse
Talk:Bright Young Things (film)

message: All_Things_Bright_and_Beautiful: whereas searching f/ one brings both, is there an influence, or a coincidence?
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 22:30, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ All_Things_Bright_and_Beautiful ]] 

message: Why are all the quoted reviews for this British film from American publications? As if I need to ask...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.251.196.62 (talk) 11:08, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  America is not the world 

message: The "Bright Young People" of the 1920s were also commonly referred to as Bright Young Things, and still are, and the article should reflect this somewhere. If not, the film title may hijack the phrase on wikipedia.86.42.223.129 (talk) 14:18, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bright Young Things / People
Talk:Because of Winn-Dixie

message: that is based on a true story I think
:                  Winn Dixie                   In the movie Winn Dixie smiles at everyone he meets. How can a dog smile? Are the smiles Fake?  How does this work?  Dani preteen11 23:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Ville, St. Louis

message: Please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject St. Louis/articles to find out how to improve this page.  DaronDierkes (talk) 02:50, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Do List 
Talk:Mean Machine (film)

message: Jason Statham (The Monk) wasn't the star, actually Statham's appearence can be recognized as a guest!
Doesn't the article says Monk (Statham) is the star player of the con team, rather than the star of the film? Considering that in the film he is debatably the most important player (the only other important player is Meehan (Jones) himself), that part of the article is correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.140.17.96 (talk) 20:40, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Plot Summary is wrong 

message: Has anyone noticed that the cast for this film, except for the main character, is nigh identical to that of the film Greenfingers?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.153.197.40 (talk) 18:18, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cast
Talk:Lord Jim (1965 film)

message: yes Money emoji, The quotes arent needed, but excuse me please: 
"Between Suez and the China Sea are many nameless men who prefer to live and die unknown. This is the story of one such man.
Among the great gallery of rogues and heroes thrown up on the beaches and ports ... no man was more respected or more damned than ... Lord Jim"
it was an interessant quote at the beginning of the film ... or not ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.27.226.107 (talk) 08:29, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The quotes arent needed
Talk:Ladder 49

message: Seems reasonable to me.
Ditto, seems like a fair enough merge.
Merge. --Daysleeper47 20:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Why does Peter Donen re-direct here? Slithymatt 17:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Donen? 

message: There is a refreence in the movie of them reciving the medal of honror which amkes nos ense to me as it is a military honor. i have not seen the movie and this amkes no sense to me. could someone explain this to me  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Esskater11 (talk • contribs) 00:17, August 28, 2007 (UTC) 
: That should be Medal of Valor (fixed)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.13.30.174 (talk) 17:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medal of Honor
Talk:Just One of the Guys

message: Apparently on the She's the Man page there has been an edit war conflict over whether or not this movie (Just One of the Guys) should be listed as another movie made that was based off of Shakespeare's Twelfth Night. Any thoughts about mentioning it on this page? Emily (Funtrivia Freak) 17:00, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Based off "Twelfth Night" 

message: Please note that He's My Girl, Anything for Love and She's the Man are NOT sequels or remakes of this film.  Please stop adding inappropriate content to suggest that they are.  --woodensuperman 08:28, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree.  Until a notable source is provided (IMDb does not count), this information cannot be restored. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 14:38, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the studios, crew, and characters are different in all films, there doesn't seem to be any likelihood that they are connected by anything other than subject matter.  --woodensuperman 15:46, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there have been "sequels" that had no connection, or only slight connections, with previous films – the films that followed Behind Enemy Lines for example.  In this case, there is simply no reliable source for the claim, so it cannot be added.  If someone finds such a source, we can revisit the issue.  I have my doubts, though. ---The Old JacobiteThe '45 20:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequels and remakes