lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cottonwood Mall (Albuquerque, New Mexico)

message: "To this day, and with the exception of a new mall under construction in the South Valley, it is the newest completed enclosed shopping mall in New Mexico."
I haven't found any sources to verify evidence that there was indeed plans to build an enclosed shopping mall in South Valley. If the editor who said this is referring to Las Estancias, I will remove the part saying, "and with the exception of a new mall under construction in the South Valley," because Las Estancias is actually a mixed-use development: https://www.abqjournal.com/1125983/las-estancias-looks-to-cast-wide-retail-net.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanking2919 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Since when was there an enclosed shopping mall planned in South Valley?
Talk:Ordered logit

message: I propose a merge with ordered probit. Neither article has any information, but there is certainly no reason to consider them separately. Pdbailey 15:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with ordered probit? 

message: I wish someone would more thoroughly explain the proportional odds assumption here, or at its own page.
Briancady413 (talk) 23:44, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see why, the existing text was so awful as to be counterproductive. PDBailey (talk) 02:47, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have now replaced the phenomenally vague account of the proportional odds assumption that was given here. Michael Hardy (talk) 17:55, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

text: I clarified the distribution of the error term. Anton Nils (talk) 14:05, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity of Text 

message: I've put a "factual accuracy" tag in place because I don't have time to do any editing at the moment. I think the technical details are in some places confused.  I'll be back. Michael Hardy (talk) 21:34, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: it's been more than a year and you still haven't described any specific problem with the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 06:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

text: I was wondering if if I'm misunderstanding something regarding your explanation of the proportional odds assumption and wanted to ask before editing. If the logarithms form an arithmetic sequence, this would mean that the difference between the intercepts in the model is equal. However, the proportional odds assumption means that the coefficients are the same across pairs of categories. In other words, the change in the log-odds that corresponds to a change in the linear combination of the parameters is the same for every pair that is listed. I also could not find any reference to the idea of an arithmetic sequence of the log-odds in the source you cited. There are sources that took it from here, though. If the probabilities (  p_1, p_2, ... p_5  ) here refer to those predicted by the model, than the log-odds definitely do not form an arithmetic sequence. Ofyalcin (talk) 20:16, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the explanation of the proportional odds assumption was faulty and I have revised it. The logarithms do not need to form an arithmetic sequence; instead, the crucial part is that the differences are the same regardless of x. Anton Nils (talk) 14:10, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, thanks! Ofyalcin (talk) 20:20, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "accuracy" 

message: The proportional odds model is only one form of ordinal logistic regression; there is also, e.g., the partial proportional odds model, see eg. Peterson & Harrell. I will try to come back and do more with this. PeterLFlomPhD (talk) 23:22, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proportional odds model
Talk:Ordered probit

message: Is there a good reason to have seperate pages for ordered logit and probit?
: I see none, but the people who don't realize the difference is slight see one. Pdbailey (talk) 22:47, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I really do not see why these pages have not been merged yet. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 19:06, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  why have this page 

message: It is meaningless in that it says nothing to someone who doesn't already knows what it is. For example what does a "flavor" mean?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.206.30.194 (talk) 16:39, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Try . It's the fifth section of the lemma. Classical geographer (talk) 09:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: and also
Talk:Mike Yaconelli

message: Perhaps somebody can complete
91.6.100.30 (talk) 10:47, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I cannot claim to be either a friend or relative of Mike Yaconelli.  However, I did have the privilege of meeting him, and sharing lunch, a number of years ago.
I can accept the criticim of this article that it is not sufficiently biographical. That can and should be easily rectified by those with the details to hand.
As for the propriety of his inclusion - that must go without saying.  Mike was a published author and globally respected in his field.  That field may have been outside the orbit of many Wikipedia readers, but since when has that been a criterion for inclusion.  
The very strength of this organ is that it can have the breadth and capacity to record details of people like Mike Yaconelli, and perhaps broaden the perspective of some others - JAH 195.58.69.85 08:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See coverage in Christianity Today at the time of his death, a few months later, their online news magazine interviewed a couple years earlier.  (Full versions of first two only available to subscribers.)  See coverage of death in Crosswalk.com's news department, by their senior news & culture editor here (1st of 3 web pages).  Audio interview by World Vision report available at .    Obituary in a secular newspaper here.  Amazon book rankings are current sales volume; he died 4 years ago, so the current rankings are not meaningful indicators of the ranks of the books at the time they were released, which is when best sellerdom is measured.  Plenty more sources out there; I didn't bother going past the first page of google results since notability is obvious once the research is done.  GRBerry 17:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied from AfD to help sourcing
Talk:Otto Stolz

message: The condition f((x+y)/2)<(f(x)+f(y))/2 is just a convexity condition.  For example, the absolute value function on [-1,1] satisfies it, without being differentiable, contrary to the claim in the article.  Tkuvho (talk) 04:35, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be "has left and right derivatives." Xanthoxyl < 20:29, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  differentiable? 

message: I think it is notable that Otto Stolz may have been the first to publish a counter-example to L'Hôpital's rule (see wiki and a paper on it). Baltakatei 21:52, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  L'Hôpital's Rule counterexample
Talk:Shelley Conn

message: If Shelley Conn was born in Sri Lanka, then it's almost certain that Shelley Conn is not her real name. Does anyone have that information? If her real name IS Conn, is it possible she is of jewish descent?Colin marks (talk) 21:26, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's conjecture based on Conn/Cohn being a Jewish name. I have also removed the blog you had added as a reference. Blogs are not reliable sources per WP:RS. – ukexpat (talk) 19:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Real name

message: It seems unlike that Shelley Conn actually appeared in this film. She doesn't seem to be in the credits. How can she play Leo's girlfriend if she was 9/10 years old at the time? Why would an English child actress be in an obscure Australian film? And why would that have been her only role until 2000? None of it makes sense
:Indeed, the character of "Leo's girlfriend" in For Love Alone was played by Naomi Watts. I've deleted this unsourced "credit".--Muzilon (talk) 09:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  For Love Alone credit
Talk:Overdetermined system

message: Some of the expansion here belongs at system of linear equations, really. The use of the linear case was to be able to illustrate how to count constants, in a less abstract setting. Charles Matthews 20:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the example is necessary for the reader who doesn't know how to count constants already. I think I wiki-linked to system of linear equations in the article, but it didn't really give the example that I was going for, so I wrote my own.--Cronholm144 07:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Shelley von Strunckel

message: Just removed a broken and link and a spam link as per User talk:Clooneymark ‎ MakeSense64 (talk) 09:06, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  external links 
Talk:P-rep

message: Thanks for the image of the p-rep function, but some comments would be helpful. I believe the p-value is shown on the x-axis and the p-rep on the y-axis. Now for a p-value of close to zero, the plot gives a p-rep of close to one. Any comments on the meaning of this? 194.120.84.9 (talk) 11:36, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is supposed to be the probability of reproducing a result at most as extreme as the result obtained. Unfortunately, though, it is impossible to calculate replicability without knowing the prior distribution of what you are trying to measure. The p-rep values seem to me to be a joke.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ummonk (talk • contribs) 22:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Sherab Palden Beru

message: I would prefer to see an image of Sherab Palden unflanked by dharma peacock luvvies. There's a tremendous Flickr at http://www.flickr.com/photos/ommane/308568165/ but it's not licensed to the Wiki Commons and I can't find contact details for the photographer to ask permission for a change of copyright. Equally there should be at least one image of Sherab Palden's thangkas. Given that his monastery has made a handsome living selling reproductions of them these past 40 +  years you would have thought some concessions might now be made. One might add also given his unsparing commitment to training Western students one of them might provide a more comprehensive and adequately sourced bio and appreciation than that offered here. An elaboration of the training he undertook as a thangka artist in Tibet would be especially welcome. Rinpoche (talk) 14:25, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Pairwise coprime

message: Should this article be merged into Coprime?  Richard Pinch (talk) 17:08, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I vote yes: this article will never naturally have enough information to merit being its own article, while it would work very naturally as a section or two of the article coprime.  I've stuck on a template. Joel B. Lewis (talk) 00:09, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

text: I agree, and there' consensus at the other talk page, as well. I'm going ahead with the merge. Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Sherlie Matthews

message: ""With a Little Help from My Friends" with Joe Cocker," because her name neither appears on the record, which does list players nor in the wikipedia article on the song.  So if you want to put it back please include a reference.  A good one. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 21:14, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: So, I can find Merry Clayton & Clydie King as singing  background vocals on Sweet Home Alabama, but not Sherlie Matthews, so I have removed that song too. This is making me a little nervous. Carptrash (talk) 21:19, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just cut out 

message: So, I had done some fixes on this page because that there was an section about an book that I removed because that section sounded like it did not belong on the page and not had to do with Sherlie Matthews. My edits are not vandalism, It’s trying to fix it because this article has multiple issues and did not look like an encyclopedic article, it sounded like Sherlie’s biography on an random website that isn’t encyclopedic. 2601:406:4200:8E90:4163:A0B3:E494:5BF (talk) 16:54, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit
Talk:Parabolic partial differential equation

message: This article is very helpful and needs attention. It should really address the topic which it claims to be about. Larus 17:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, the article should start with info copied from Partial differential equation#Classification --Berland 17:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Also agree — the article should provide a general definition, for example.  — DIV (128.250.204.118 08:11, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs attention

message: It is a serious problem with this article that it has no definition of its subject, not even in its Definition section.
First we are given an example of the "simplest kind of parabolic PDE".
Next we are given "The basic example of a parabolic PDE".
And next we are told that "The concept of a parabolic PDE can be generalized in several ways."
But wait — before we are told how to generalize the notion, we need to know what the notion is. 
Yet at no point in the article is the subject defined. 2601:200:C000:1A0:DD91:A900:A86F:27B0 (talk) 21:34, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition section contains no definition
Talk:Sherman Smith

message: http://www.espn.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/24505521/the-jaw-dropping-story-nfl-coach-search-family
2001:569:7859:2300:64B1:303A:36BD:31D5 (talk) 22:08, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turns out he's [[Deland McCullough]]'s dad.
Talk:Shermine Shahrivar

message: The true name is Parsi, not farsi. Arabs say farsi cause they can't pronounce P. Plus, in English it's calld Persian, not parsi or farsi.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.255.46.224 (talk) 04:38, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  She speaks .... Iranian. 

message: Does anyone have a (good) picture for this article? Thanks! LouisAragon (talk) 23:58, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture needed!! 
Talk:Paradox of enrichment

message: I've added some counter-examples after Roy and Chattopadhyay (2007). They're probably not as clearly worded as they could be, and definitely need examples. Hunting down some of their references might be a good place to start. Basically, the model doesn't work out most of the time, and there needs to be a section explaining why. Dackerts (talk) 21:23, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Added a citation to the Roy and Chattopadhyay paper. This nicely summarises possible explanations. I have tidied up the text below to list all the points of Roy and Chattopadhyay.  I have tried to change to wording and clarify the text to achieve some of the clarity that  Dackerts was trying to achieve. The "alternative view" section was one of the points of  Roy and Chattopadhyay. It was out of balance and I have now included in the bullet point list with a link to the Arditi Ginzburg model, which is where much of the argument is stated that used to be in the "alternative view" section. There are many alternative views on this, ratio dependence being one of them, and higlighting one not the others gives a poor balance of argument. Ratio depenencs is one of the  more controversial explanations.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Squi22 (talk • contribs) 16:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Roy and Chattopadhyay reference
Talk:Sherrie Rollins Westin

message: Article has been edited by a user with the same name as the subject and by a couple of IPs, all adding similar unsourced promotional content ("spearheaded", "staunch advocate"), which is found elsewhere on the web so may be a copyvio of a press release or CV. Article may need temporary protection. Tacyarg (talk) 17:02, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated addition of unsourced promotional content
Talk:Pareto chart

message: Just noticed the sample graph does not exactly represent the 80-20 rule very well.
:The rule is more accurately that given two properties a minority of one corresponds with a majority of another.  In this case, a minority of factors (2/6) result in a majority of lateness (60%).  81.111.114.131 (talk) 22:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sheryl Underwood

message: COURT DISMISSES LAWSUITS AGAINST ZETA PHI BETA -RoBoTamice15:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can this be verified with an independent source? —C.Fred (talk) 17:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

text: The information about Stark's lawsuit is already in the article ("Stark's claims for breach of contract and negligence were dismissed at a September 11, 2008 status conference"). The citation is provided. The information regarding the Sawyer lawsuit was released by Associated Press  and Black America Web , but the official court memorandum is not up yet. -- Absolon S. Kent (talk) 20:30, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Zeta statement on dismissal of recent lawsuits regarding Starks and Underwood <nowiki>  [</nowiki>copied from [[Zeta Phi Beta]] article talkpage<nowiki>]</nowiki>

message: The person infobox at top of article says Sheryl's website is www.sherylunderwoodandfriends.com , but that domain seems to have been cybersquatted after 2010 March (latest legit version archived by Wayback on 2010 March). Checking that Sheryl domain at www.internic.net/whois.html says "Creation Date: 2003-11-03 ...". That Sheryl domain was added to article on 21 August 2008. 
The Talk (talk show)'s website says show's Twitter is https://twitter.com/TheTalkCBS and TheTalk's Twitter says Shery's Twitter is https://twitter.com/SherylUnderwood , and that Sheryl Twitter says she is "... CEO of Pack Rat Production .." and website is http://www.packratproductionsinc.com/ . --EarthFurst (talk) 22:59, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  update website link? Old cybersquatted. New Sheryl website. 

message: Why doesn’t she just get a room the way she crawls over black men guests. Disgusting 96.19.163.34 (talk) 20:13, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actions with black guests
Talk:Chigozie Udoji

message: kak e udoji
More info is needed regarding his stay in Greece  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.194.243 (talk) 03:01, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shimon Mizrahi

message: This needs a clarification - clearly Mizrahi is not a colonel in the military police, as he never commanded any of the military police units. Was he a major during regular service and slowly promoted to colonel in the reserves? That's the only explanation I can think of if he is indeed a colonel today. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 19:57, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rank of Shimon Mizrahi

message: is this a joke? 213.137.65.213 (talk) 17:21, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It was a single contribution by a non-logged-in user, so, yeah, probably. Undone. --denny vrandečić (talk) 16:01, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  personal life
Talk:Shin Jung-hwan

message: Is he really a Scientologist?!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.57.113.247 (talk) 03:46, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shinobu Otake

message: The actress herself uses the name "Shinobu Otake" on her website: http://www.otake-shinobu.com/profile_en.html, so by the manual of style for Japan-related articles, this should not use macrons in the name. JoshuSasori (talk) 07:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move justification
Talk:Shinzen Young

message: User TheRingess edited the section External links down to a single link - "reduced links, link to official site should suffice". While I'm aware Wikipedia entries are not intended as link clearinghouses, this edit is excessive and makes it harder for visitors to find out about the subject of the article.
I propose we reinstate most of the links until the body of the article contains useful surveys of the aspects of Shinzen's teaching and biography that are currently only found on those links. Boaby (talk) 13:45, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive Editing of External links 
Talk:Shirley Anne Field

message: According to one of the bio's on IMDB her brother was a homicide victim in LA. Anyone have any info on this? brob 13:14, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Guy Broomfield, Shirley's brother, was murdered in 1999 in Walnut Creek, CA. I added some links to articles about it in the article. Checkingfax (talk) 00:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brother 

message: If Ms Field was born in June 1938, how could she have a younger brother who was born in the same year (unless he was a younger twin or immensely premature)? AuntFlo (talk) 10:14, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's more likely, as is the case with a lot of actors who knock off a couple of years, that 1938 is her official year of birth rather than her actual one. Indeed the article is now saying she was born in 1936, though it doesn't appear to be sourced. Crisso (talk) 11:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth date of brother

message: Not sure of this breaches WP:BLP? Can a beer mat have copyright, haha? Martinevans123 (talk) 22:03, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted old link which now leads to a scamming website. Blurryman (talk) 22:50, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Old Higsonian? 

message: Has anyone else noticed a slight disparity between the place of birth given in the infobox (and also given currently at IMDb) and that given in text? The sources currently used in the text do not seem to be WP:RS. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:58, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: An internet search quickly led to the two sources I've now referenced, along with the necessary edit of the article. Blurryman (talk) 22:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth 

message: Now that Field has died, is it possible to source a copyright image of her in her prime, under a fair use rationale? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:13, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image 

message: I note the BBC obituaryfor  Shirley Anne Field states she appeared in "popular TV series  including" Upstairs, Downstairs, but IMDb would not seem to support this -  I am assuming this is confusion with the 1959 film Upstairs and Downstairs hence why it is not mentioned in her roles here or on IMDb.  Dunarc (talk) 22:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it looks like the BBC has got it wrong. But IMDb is not WP:RS and I suggest BFI would be a better source. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:17, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upstairs, Downstairs?
Talk:Perfect power

message: This entry needs disambiguation from the Galvin Institute's Perfect Power, which is all about better electrical power. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.134.139.70 (talk) 
:Wikipedia is not a dictionary attempting to list all possible meanings of a term. Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Deciding to disambiguate says: Disambiguation is required whenever, for a given word or phrase on which a reader might use the "Go button", there is more than one Wikipedia article to which that word or phrase might be expected to lead. There doesn't appear to be information about Galvin Institute's Perfect Power in Wikipedia, so no disambiguation is needed. PrimeHunter (talk) 21:52, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: Here is a mathematical representation of the set:
P = \lbrace m^k : m, k \in \mathbb{N} \,, m, k > 1 \rbrace
Jeanlovecomputers (talk) 20:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Set A072777