Talk:Wellingborough

message: I've moved the following from the article text:
(Cues for future contributors with more time to hand: Economics -- boot & Shoe; Iron/Steel (xref Corby); 1980s slump; revival consequent on the development of the A45 and A14 M1-A1 link roads, which run to either side of the town.)
Silverhelm 11:32, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I've removed a load of the information on Wellingborough school, mainly because it appeared to be a large portion of pompous opiniated mess. It's uneccesary, and I've added other local (larger) schools in. 782 Naumova 17:37, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schools In the U.k 

message: For some reason or another Wellingborough is now without a Visiting centre. To the best of my knowledge it's the only town in England without one now. This could mainly be put down to the total lack of any reason to come here. The highlights of our town include having one of the ugliest shopping centres in the country, a Theatre and a river. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.29.168.201 (talk) 23:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information Centre 

message: Wellingborough's mental health services are not based in Kettering General Hospital. Outpatient treatment is available through the CMHT located at Clarendon House, Station Road and inpatient treatment at St Mary's Hospital, London Road (Both in Kettering). ReformatMe (talk) 00:06, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  999 Services - Mental Health 

message: Someone has changed the census to 72,000 but I'm confused beacuse this looks like the 2007 est and where the source is from and is it right?Likelife (talk) 10:34, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at the change last night and it is correct for the borough. I checked here as I thought that it was an incorrect change probably should have added the reference as I had it to hand. Keith D (talk) 11:53, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thoughts as it is the figure for the borough should we have a lower figure here (if we can source one) or indicate that it is for the borough as a whole? Keith D (talk) 11:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you go to the Wellingborough (borough) page it has 75,000 for the population. So I guess 72,000 is about right.Likelife (talk) 12:06, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:   2001 census 

message: Im thinking on creating a WikiProject on Northamptonshire but I would need some help and what do you think on this idea, please tell me on my talk page. Likelife (talk) 12:59, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creating a WikiProject on Northants 

message: Attention  is needed the correct  way  to  use and present  citations in  the reflist. This will  significantly reduce the burden on copyeditors  and the need to  look  up  the web sites for verification. Particular attention  is required to  punctuation, capitalisation, and repeating  of information. Where references are provided, to  external  documents or PFDs, fine details of the documents referenced do  not  need to  be listed in  the Wikipedia article. A lot of peacock terms and weasel  words have been removed,  together with some POV/non  encyclopedic tone or expressions. Some large sections are still  entirely  unreferenced, and hence subject  to  removal.--Kudpung (talk) 16:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: References 1, 2, 7, 10, 11, 14, and 16 are still  not displaying  correctly, particularly  when using  the same reference (18, 19) for several  citations. Wikipedia:Citing sources#Inline citations  gives an overview, but  i'm  not  sure if it covers PDFs.--Kudpung (talk) 01:39, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you explain more as I cannot see a problem as it stands, even a version from earlier today looks OK. Obviously the references should be converted to use one of the  family of templates and need detail added like publisher, publish date etc. Keith D (talk) 11:02, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  There is no  specific need to  use the templates, or to  convert  existing  references to  use them if the information  is already displayed correctly - in  fact it  is often quicker to  enter them manually, besides which, the templates use confusing  American date forms that  a re not  appropriate for British  articles. References in  the reflist should not  display  bare URLs or just  a  number with  an external link  icon. Wikipedia:Citing sources#Inline citations gives clear instructions how to  do  this, and how to use the same ref several  times.--Kudpung (talk) 11:37, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The templates are recommended and produce a consistent output. If a change of house style is required then a change in the template is replicated through all of the articles rather than having to go through all of the articles individually to change the style. It is much easier to apply the templates when there are few references in an article then have to go through lots when articles go on for review. Dates are not a problem as they are now output as you input them, was much better when the date auto-formatted to your preference but that was the decision and you end up having to format each one yourself. Keith D (talk) 12:12, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I  am  of course aware of all  this, I do  however personally find it  significantly easier and quicker to enter ref data manually, and will  conntinue to  do  so  where I  am  practically  the sole author/editor of an (not  this) article. Considtency  is hence guaranteed and I  can keep  up  with  other contributions.  However, the point  I  have been making  here is that  it  would be great  if other regular, multiple contributors to articles could at  least  adopt some of the basic rules for ref display, rather than relying  on others to  clean up.--Kudpung (talk) 13:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up  and copyedting. 

message: This long section  is completely  unreferenced. The information is very  detailed was obviously  taken from somewhere and must  therefore either be cited with  verifiable references, or removed as possible original  research. If adding  references do  take a look  at  the preceding  discussion: Clean up and copyedting.--Kudpung (talk) 14:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what I can do, but it's the hardist thing to find.Likelife (talk) 08:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added some but more is needed! Likelife (talk) 08:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section: Geology & Iron ore  

message: Should the second paragraph of the economy section be moved to the future section? Likelife (talk) 11:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  future 

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.[?]
*If there is not a free use image in the top right corner of the article, please try to find and include one.[?]
*As done in WP:FOOTNOTE, footnotes usually are located right after a punctuation mark (as recommended by the CMS, but not mandatory), such that there is no space in between. For example, the sun is larger than the moon [2]. is usually written as the sun is larger than the moon.[2][?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
*Consider applying the WP:UKCITIES more closely.
*Take a look at Wikipedia:WikiProject_UK_geography#Featured_articles for ideas on content, layout and level of referencing.
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, --Jza84 |  Talk   17:13, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review 

message: As requested a few comments from a look over page.
#DAB required for dip  --Kudpung (talk) 03:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: Are you sure? They end up on two complete different websites about sport. Likelife(talk) 17:01, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like the numbering has changed since I wrote the comments, try 46 & 48 now, which are the Stagecoach pages under Transport. Keith D (talk) 18:03, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the numbering will have shifted beacuse I  deleted a superfluous ref.--Kudpung (talk) 14:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

text: Thanks enormously  for that  input  Keith.Anyone successfully  addressing  these points, PLEASE put  this    () template against  them. Thanks. --Kudpung (talk) 02:54, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be worth adding alt text for the images now, though not necessary for GA it is a requirement for FA. Keith D (talk) 09:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Human  peer review from  Keith

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Wellingborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081218012601/http://www.eastmidlandstrains.co.uk:80/EMTrains/YourDestinations/Eurostar/ to http://www.eastmidlandstrains.co.uk/EMTrains/YourDestinations/Eurostar/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071018080012/http://www.wellingborough.gov.uk/site/scripts/documents_info.php?categoryID=1490&documentID=73 to http://www.wellingborough.gov.uk/site/scripts/documents_info.php?categoryID=1490&documentID=73
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120303224814/http://www.globalcuesportscentre.com/globalsnookercentre/files/Players/Global_Europe/Global_England/eng_jamie_oneill.htm to http://www.globalcuesportscentre.com/globalsnookercentre/files/Players/Global_Europe/Global_England/eng_jamie_oneill.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:58, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The source for the town being established by someone called Waendel is a dead link. In any case it's pure speculation. No Anglo-Saxon character of that name is recorded. 'Towns' weren't 'founded' in that place and time, rather settlements were established. I've removed speculation and dead link, and improved anachronistic language. asnac (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious references as to origins 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Wellingborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100608054139/http://www.wellingboroughmuseum.co.uk/ to http://www.wellingboroughmuseum.co.uk/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828160142/http://www.cummins-uk.com/ to http://www.cummins-uk.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Wellingborough. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091029040832/http://www.tresham.ac.uk/about/our_campuses to http://www.tresham.ac.uk/about/our_campuses
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828135119/http://www.explorenorthamptonshire.co.uk//exec/144603/12544/ to http://www.explorenorthamptonshire.co.uk/exec/144603/12544/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Wellingborough isn't a large town despite having 53k, it isn't yet at the large which is defined by government as being 60k-174k population but Wellingborough is still a way off yet so please don't readd large as I will revert it. Check an official definition before you argue it  DragonofBatley (talk) 15:40, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large 

message: It has come to my attention that @Johndane1965 keeps adding "commuter" to the lead and removing civil parish which involves a town or parish council. I don't see why and it doesn't keep in sync with other Northamptonshire town articles. @Crouch, Swale, @AD Hope, @KeithD and @John Maynard Friedman. Thoughts? Is commuter town appropriate? DragonofBatley (talk) 08:00, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Commuting is mentioned here but yes I'd say unless its important/commonly mentioned it doesn't need to be in the lead and to just keep town and civil parish. Crouch, Swale (talk)  08:08, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New lead edits @Johndane1965