lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of birds of Africa

message: This article may be too long...move/split into List of African birds: passerines and List of African birds: non-passerines? —Bmdavll talk 08:12, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting list 

message: The update to the most recently available source lists and taxonomy (as of August 2017) required many systematic changes to the article as well as changes within families. Rather than note them at every occurrence I list them here.
* The format of each family's title is changed to be the same as that of nearly all other lists of birds, with the only links being to the scientific names of Order and Family.
* The titles of each family section are generally those of Clements, though a few are modified to better reflect the African species. For instance, Vireonidae is titled "Vireos" rather than "Vireos, shrike-babblers, and erpornis".
* Species have been deleted if they don't appear in any of the three source lists or if on a source list they're noted as outside the area covered by this list (e.g. diving-petrels).
* Species (except vagrants) have been added if they appear in at least two of the three source lists, but the sources of the additions aren't individually noted in the edit summaries.
* Vagrant species are added from the ABC list but the source isn't individually noted in the edit summaries.
* Changes to English names, genera, and specific epithets and changes to the sequence of species within a family are all from Clements, as implied in the introduction. They are noted but not sourced in the edit summaries.
* The tag (Introduced) has been added to four species per the ABC as noted in the introduction, so it's not sourced in the edit summaries.
* The use of the (V) tag is described in the introduction, so it's not sourced in the edit summaries.
* The ABC does not specifically note endemism, so the (E) tags are from Clements; they are not sourced in the edit summaries.
Craigthebirder (talk) 07:45, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2017 update
Talk:Honi HaMe'agel

message: Doesn't look like the wikiSource for the Mishna is intact yet.  Once it is, we should probably link to it.  (of course, there's no guarantee that will ever happen).
-- Vonfraginoff 08:13, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the link, just in case: Ta'anit 3:4
Corrected the reference, it's Ta'anit 3:8, not Ta'anit 3:4. WBcoleman (talk) 08:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ext. link for Mishna 

message: It's not that far a conjectural leap from that to the loaves and fishes, y'know, and thus to a schism. 68.32.48.221 (talk) 22:21, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish miracle workers? 1st century BCE? 

message: I am planning on adding in a short section about the different ending to the sleep story in the Jerusalem Talmud and how it is another example of the sleeper story theme. I also am going to point out the Greek Epimenides sleep story because that is the theme's origin and I think that would help with the understanding of a reader. Lastly, I'm adding a source which has this DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15700704-12341328. This is an article by a man named Zvi Ron about the one biblical and two Talmudic stories about Honi and how they relate to the sleep theme. The last bit is about making the current writing either incorporate or exclude the Jerusalem Talmud when necessary. I'm aiming for about 200-300 words and I am going to stick as close to that as possible. I would love to receive any input or comments other editors have. Just write me either on this Talk page or my Talk page. Nathan46290 (talk) 07:22, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like it could be worthwhile. But of course it depends what you do with it. Ar2332 (talk) 08:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, perfect. Do you have anything in mind that you think needs to make it into the section? Also, do you have any general suggestions or tips? Nathan46290 (talk) 21:38, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing comes to mind - I am not particularly familiar with the sources. Sorry Ar2332 (talk) 06:21, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The dead link should be fixed now. Thank you for telling me and please let me know if there are any other issues. Nathan46290 (talk) 16:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I was wondering, you wrote "a theme originating in the story of Epimenides", do we have actual proof that this is the case? Does the article you linked to say it? (I don't have permission to read it) Ar2332 (talk) 19:16, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a bit about the Jerusalem Talmud
Template talk:NotifyPOTD2

message: You can also use the template  when dropping a courtesy notification of an upcoming POTD on the talk page of a user involved in creating the picture. For a reused POTD  can be used instead. They both take three parameters: the imagename, the date of the POTD and the pagename of the primary PicOfTheDay page.
:
Although often the resulting message will still need correcting for details such as changing 'photo' to 'illustration'. -- Solipsist 08:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: User notification
Template talk:NotifyPOTD

message: You can also use the template  when dropping a courtesy notification of an upcoming POTD on the talk page of a user involved in creating the picture. For a reused POTD  can be used instead. They both take three parameters: the imagename, the date of the POTD and the pagename of the primary PicOfTheDay page.
:
Although often the resulting message will still need correcting for details such as changing 'photo' to 'illustration'. -- Solipsist 08:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: User notification
Talk:Wicked Pictures

message: Do we really need separate sections for current vs. past contract performers? I think we should just have one list, with the end date left blank for current performers... Valrith (talk) 00:08, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of contract performers 

message: Why Mikayla Mendez doesnt have an article? MachoCarioca (talk) 17:09, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Mikayla
Talk:Fra Mauro

message: Is it sure south is at the top in the picture?  it doesn't appear so
:I think the caption is saying "Normally this map is shown with south at the top (presumably this is the orientation Mauro intended when he created the map), but this picture has been inverted so that's not the case." The wording could be made clearer, I guess. Bryan 17:23, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since Wikipedia is not a universal directory of names, it doesn't aid the reader to have a separate article for Fra Mauro, who is only encyclopediable for this map. --Wetman 01:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested merge

message: The Fra Mauro if an area of the moon surriunded by oceanus procellarum and is the landing site of the Apollo 14 Lunar Module.
Perhaps this page should be made a disambiguation page between them Bryan A (talk) 20:17, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moon 

message: The Bibliography section feels really unfinished. I think we should change it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.47.206.121 (talk) 10:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Samuel Crompton

message: or the Hall-i'-th'-Wood (pronounced Al-i-thwood) 
*I have asked around and no one else that I have found from Bolton recognises that pronunciation.  The answer below sums out the pronunciation quite well.
::'Al' suggests a short 'A' as in Al Jolson, which would be quite wrong.  
::The 'A' is long as in All.  The aitch is sometimes dropped, but nowadays generally not, in my experience.
::Also the grouping suggest the wrong arrangement of syllables.
::The name is pronounced as a two-syllable word with the stress on the first syllable:
::Hallith/wood
::--jmb 01:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Has anyone found any evidence of the suggested pronounciation (Al-i-thwood)?  If not then can it be removed or corrected? --jmb 06:33, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hall i'th Wood
Talk:MidAtlantic Airways

message: Making it all past tense correcting US Airways vs. US Airways Group ownership, originally airline was to be a US Airways Group Co, but was changed to US Airways subsidary at the union's urging.  Also moved sentance about Republic over to that article.  —Cliffb 06:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full Edit Summary for 06:08, 2006 August 17 (UTC) edit.
Talk:Derek Acorah

message: Suggesting indefinite semi protection for this article due to frequent vandalism Cpqueeley89 (talk) 12:56, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The referenced deletion is not vandalism. Derek Akorah's message did not foresee his own demise. It was an announcement that he'll resume "giving messages from spirit" as soon as he has recovered sufficiently from his bout with influenza to do so. https://www.hellomagazine.com/celebrities/2020010482666/derek-acorah-has-died-aged-69-his-wife-reveals/ Fringe Dweller (talk) 13:25, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi Protection 

message: However, Acorah did in fact (possibly accidentally, on his Twitter account) foresee his own demise in early 2020 with the words "I hope to be back within the next couple of days when I will be giving messages from spirit for the new year. Have a wonderful day everybody and much love to you all! X."Acorah foretells of his future as a spirit entity This is vandalism! Cpqueeley89 (talk) 13:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Page protection can be requested at WP:RFPP, but User:MIDI has now protected it – Thjarkur (talk) 13:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This sounds like he knew he was about to joss it: The star continued: "I hope to be back within the next couple of days when I will be giving messages from [the] spirit for the New Year. Have a wonderful day everybody and much love to you all!" 86.187.229.176 (talk) 22:02, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi protected edit request 

message: The only source I can find on how he picked this name is from his obituary in the Guardian, which merely states he got it from a Dutch ancestor. Can we find out the original quote or perhaps some other form of clarification? I'm a bit suspicious because "Acorah" doesn't even remotely resemble a Dutch word. Of course there's always the chance he made that story up. Prinsgezinde (talk) 13:04, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding his stage name "Acorah"

message: Should it not read "claimed to be a spiritual medium"? Rustygecko (talk) 17:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: On Wikipedia, Mediumship is defined as the practice of ‘’purportedly’’ mediating communication between spirits of the dead and living human beings. So there’s no need to add the precursor ‘claimed’ here. Obscurasky (talk) 23:44, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spiritual medium?
Talk:Cadalso

message: I just moved the article Cadalso (localidad) to Cadalso de Gata in the Spanish wikipedia. The latter is not an official name, though. I just did it because cadalso is also a common name and a family name and there are other places in Spain called Cadalso, (such as Cadalso de los Vidrios, Madrid). Cadalso de Gata is often used but I would´nt recommend to move the article here at en:, as there are no desambiguation problems. --alfanje 09:19, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Republic Airways

message: Any objection to splitting this into two articles?  Vegaswikian 02:54, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not here..  I'm going to wait the obligatory five days, then split them though.. —Cliffb 06:01, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split of article 

message: I am very curious about why the call sign of "Brickyard" for Republic Airlines. If anyone knows, could he/she add it to the article?--Mmpartee 22:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, never mind, I figured it out. It must come from the fact that they are HQ'd in Indianapolis. --Mmpartee 23:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Call Sign? 

message: The prior "history", showing that Republic Airlines started as Chautauqua in the 1970s, is simply wrong.
Chautauqua started in the 1970s, eventually was taken public as a holding company called Republic Airways Holdings (RAH) with one operating subsidiary, Chautauqua.
Later, RAH needed to create a new subsidiary -- Republic Airlines. Republic Airlines was a separate subsidiary from Chautauqua -- and was created from scratch. Nothing to do with Chautauqua, except that they were sibling subsidiaries.
Republic Airlines didn't exist prior to 2004. That's when it started. Not in the 1970s as Chautauqua.
They are completely separate subsidiaries, and indeed, completely separate "Part 121" certificates. In fact, the fact that they're separate companies with separate certificates is the whole reason Republic Airlines was created. It was created for the specific purpose of NOT being Chautauqua.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enplaned (talk • contribs) 04:24, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Republic Airlines 

message: I flew Republic Airlines, Los Angeles to Puerto Vallarta, in 1981 or '82.
I also flew on a Republic Airlines plane from a NYC airport to LA in 1993.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.187.223.153 (talk) 08:34, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Republics? 

message: US Express doesn't exist as a brand any longer. If you can explain this well, feel free to update the lemma accordingly.
76.11.79.151 (talk) 08:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No More US Epxress 

message: I read somewhere that United flight 3411 is actually run by Republic Airline. Can somebody with more knowledge in the topic verify? I think it might be notable that, if this is the case, they are responsible for a 3% drop in the value of UAL stock. 50.59.88.46 (talk) 17:50, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm looking at that now, and don't want to put anything in the article until I'm sure.Yojimbo1941 (talk) 18:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  United Passenger Drag-out
Talk:Washington Park, Denver

message: Added this Washington Park article on 12/07/05. Please feel free to add any additional information.
Vertigo700 09:20, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You wrote "A statue featuring Wynken, Blynken, and Nod, characters from his famous poem "Dutch Lullaby," sits near the cottage where he lived from 1881-1883 that was moved to the park."  Was the cottage moved to the park (neighborhood) or into the park (on the premesis of public park) or are you trying to say that the statue was moved into the park from his cottage? Sentence makes it sound like the entire cottage was moved. --MattWright (talk) 18:01, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Thanks, the edit you made cleared things up! --MattWright (talk) 21:22, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: It has been proposed below that Washington Park be renamed and moved to Washington Park (baseball) so that Washington Park (disambiguation) can be moved in its place.  Please discuss at Talk:Washington Park.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  15:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:GoJet Airlines

message: An IP removed the controversy section, and I support his edit because the section was not referenced and may have been false. Shalom Hello 02:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section 

message: New ATC Callsign is LINDBERGH per listening to O"hare Approach on 01 OCT 2007 on Liveatc.net
Dougsnow 13:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New ATC Callsign 

message: I noticed that both of these aircraft are listed under the CRJ-700. Shouldn’t they be separated seeing how they are certified as two different aircraft? CZ3699 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 13:56, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation of CRJ-700 and CRJ-550
Talk:Latins

message: While the contents of the article that were the result of content forking and original research have been removed, the article still has problems. It is basically not an article about a specific thing, but rather an article about what various things were called. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The contents of this article is better suited for a disambiguation page. That content has already been transferred to Latin (disambiguation). As the scope of the title seriously overlaps with Latins (Italic tribe), this article therefore serves no purpose other serving as a source of confusion for readers. Krakkos (talk) 14:00, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is still problematic 

message: This article used to cover a whole variety of things called "Latin". This was not in accordance with WP:NAD. Most of the content was forked from other articles, in particular Latins (Italic tribe). The scope of the article had serious overlap with Romance peoples and Latins (Italic tribe). Much of the article lacked sources, and none of the sources that existed covered the topic "Latins" as a whole. Instead we had sources covering a whole range of separate issues that were synthesized through obvious original research. I have therefore trimmed the article down to the topic that was actually addressed directly by the sources, namely the demonym/exonym Latin as it was used during the Middle Ages. Unlike the other topics previously addressed in the article, this medieval name is not addressed in detail in other articles, meaning that content forking and scope issues will not be a problem.  I've moved the page to a more specific title so as to avoid confusion with Latins (Italic tribe) and ~Romance peoples. Krakkos (talk) 14:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trimming and moving 

message: The redirect Latin peoples has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Joy (talk) 13:19, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Latin peoples]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Port-du-Salut cheese

message: I think this should be merged with the article 'Port-Salut cheese', since they describe exactly the same cheese.
: Not *exactly* the same cheese; Port Salut is the trade name for one particular (and distinctive) brand, while Port-du-Salut is the generic term for all cheeses of this particular region/type.
::I agree that the pages should be merged, since the content is so similar. Also, I think it would be more beneficial to have the information in one page, since the information I was looking for was not in the page on which I expected it to be. Lithium (talk) 14:09, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Proposal
Talk:CropSyst

message: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cropsyst. Johnleemk | Talk 17:06, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed AFD 
Talk:Self-invested personal pension

message: Maybe some mention of how the U-turn over property being allowed into SIPPS may affect the uk housing market confidence is called for here? - TomRobinson 09:53, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not entirely sure its warranted. While the housing market may not have extra fuel injected, there already exist several major structural tax benefits to keep the housing market up, as well as the fact that the UK continues to make too few houses, as compared to the level of household formation. However, these may be some effect, but I think we should wait and see. Cheers, Nick Kerr 15:08, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: This phrase reads like a brochure. It should say what the investments are.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.103.145 (talk) 18:31, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: the full range of HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) approved investments
Talk:Open Archives Initiative

message: what is difference between OAI and open access?
As i know the one thing is that OAI is a tool for Open Access
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wikiwizzy/Archive1#Update_feed Brief mention of plans for a Wikipedia-OAI --Historiograf 01:40, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The tone of the article implies the organization is long-dead — are there sources to support this?
* At least one of the discussion lists listed on their official web site are still active as of June 2022.
* The ResourceSync Framework Specification, (ANSI/NISO Z39.99-2017), is from only several years ago.
— Jim Grisham (talk) 00:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past tense?
Talk:Austin Healey

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it to be moved. 
See Talk:Austin-Healey 
WhiteNight T | @ | C 00:54, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Result
Talk:Vienna International Centre

message: On 15:33, 23 May 2006, Newkai added this text to the opener:
: The UN refers to this agglomeration as the United Nations Office at Vienna. 
I have removed this statment, which is incorrenct.  The United Nations Office at Vienna is ONE of the organizations inhabiting the campus, NOT an official name for the campus.  See article for details.
--QEDquid 11:40, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: I would also add that the whole Komplex (UnoCity+AustriaCenter+Blocks of Flats) is also called (known as) Danubecity (german: Donaucity) and the Locals call it (german: Donauplatte)
Emergency99 (talk) 17:35, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  DanubeCity 
Talk:Distance measuring equipment

message: What is the todays standard accuracy of a DME? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.76.251.6 (talk • contribs) 10:40, December 7, 2005‎
According to the DME section of the 2001 Federal Radionavigation Systems (2001 FRS) publication released by the DOD and DOT, Page 3-29:
Accuracy (2 sigma)
* Predictable - The ground station errors are less than ±0.1 nm. The overall system error
(airborne and ground RSS) is not greater than ±0.5 nm or 3 percent of the distance,
whichever is greater.
* Relative - Although some errors could be introduced by reflections, the major relative
error emanates from the receiver and flight technical error.
* Repeatable - Major error components of the ground system and receiver will not vary
appreciably in the short term.
Hope this helps -- Dual Freq 01:01, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy

message: Shouldn't this article include Doppler indicators, under historical parts ? They were commonly used on the first generation of Transatlantic jet airliners, like Boeing707 and DC8, possibly even later models.Boeing720 (talk) 21:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Doppler radar navigation? As discussed in this article? That sounds like an aircraft based radar coupled with an inertial navigation system. Wikipedia could probably use an article about doppler navigation if some decent sources could be found. Doppler_radar#navigation has some items. Green Satin radar might be similar or an earlier model. Sounds like a dead reckoning system that uses doppler radar for a more accurate ground speed. How does it fit in with DME? DME wouldn't be useful in transatlantic flights many miles from land or comparable to that system. --Dual Freq (talk) 21:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doppler indicators forgotten ?  

message: The term UHF, although used by ICAO, is confusing to some, who would prefer the term L-band. I added this, and made a few other edits.
NavigationGuy (talk) 14:52, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  DME Operates in the L-Band (960-1215 MHz)
Talk:Edward Greenspan

message: Daniel Bailey is listed as one of his clients, but I can't find any evidence that Bailey's ever been charged with anything, let alone that Greenspan defended him.  The claim has been in this article for years, but it really needs a citation. -- 28 Dec 2014  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.171.45.223 (talk) 18:05, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Daniel Bailey

message: I notice he is acting for Conrad Black in his current trial in Chicago. Has Greenspan done previous cases in Illinois? Or in other jurisdictions aside from Ontario? --Mathew5000 06:14, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Called to the bar of which jurisdictions? 