lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Arthur (operating system)

message: Article merged: See talk-page. --trevj (talk) 14:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: Does anyone else feel this article shoud be merged with RISC OS. Arthur being version 0.x and 1.x, and RISC OS being version 2.x to 6.x. The development of the OS and its module components is a continous line.
--Flibble 11:36, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal (August 2007)

message: :Image:AcornArthur110desktopsmall.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 01:15, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:AcornArthur110desktopsmall.png

message: Suggestion - Merge RISC OS and Arthur (Operating System)
If this suggestion proceeds, then I guess Arthur (operating system) would be nominated for deletion. --trevj (talk) 08:52, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Forget that. Arthur (operating system) could subsequently be redirected to RISC OS. --trevj (talk) 14:48, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion - Merge RISC OS and Arthur (Operating System)
Talk:Record producer

message: There's no mention of women producers in the article and the list of influential producers contains none. There's a subcategory of Women Record Producers with over 300 names so it is relevant. Also should distinguish the difference between "record producer" by title and a recording artist. Actaudio (talk) 06:57, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, I just reread the American Women and Recording Producing section. Holy crap, someone rewrote it and did a hell of a fine job. Great work, Wikipedians! Burtre26 (talk) 09:50, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs section for women record producers 

message: I thought this article was about producers, not engineers. The person in the picture is described as an engineer, not a producer. There is a difference and many producers never touch a mixing console. The first paragraph well describes this. It's not enough so say some do both. I'm tempted to just delete it because it's so blatantly incorrect. It is admittedly wrong. They are 2 different jobs. The article well describes the job of a producer so why is there a photo of an engineer here. Put that on the engineer page.  Find a photo of an actual producer standing behind the engineer or a photo of a producer out in the studio talking to a band, and you'll have a better depiction than this extremely misleading photo. But frankly, I'm sick of ending up against the 3 revert rule after I delete, someone makes a lame comment in defense and reverts, then I point out the lameness of the argument and revert again and the same person comes back again and reverts, often without comment and BANG! Up against it. So, as another frustrated editor who had made a very logical comment said on this talk page... have fun. Jackhammer111 (talk) 23:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Dobre ste ma potešili ste ma informovali v tom čase sa však na Slovensku s tebou súhlasím so spracovaním osobných údajov v zmysle zákona o dani z príjmov fyzickej osobe alebo právnickej osoby na to help you 95.102.242.107 (talk) 19:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: misleading photo

message: Artiste solide 169.255.206.217 (talk) 21:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shopping markel max
Talk:Titanium

message: The aerospace section lists titanium as a component used in the compressor blades of various currently produced high end commercial aircraft turbines.  This is false.  Its widely known and easily verified that these types of jets and turbofans use *Rhenealloys* and their composition is one of the factors that subjects these components to export restriction or other controls.
the 2nd point is just an addition:  The segment about the A12 and SR71 and the latter discussion about the Soviet Union's submarines is missing a highly informative tidbit:  The US government purchased the titanium for the SR71 FROM the soviet union, at the time by far the only source of the metal in sufficient quantities for the fleet of aircraft.  This information can be found in the autobiography of Kelly Johnson of Lockeed Martin Skunkworks.  I can't remember the specifics offhand, but IIRC they were purchased by CIA intermediate front companies.  Obviously, the soviet union has been known to do that sort of thing over the years (eg they used to be the global 1st source for solid rocket motors for space launch platforms, which would of course include launches of spy satellites and whatnot)67.165.123.62 (talk) 08:11, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  inaccuracy and needed background 

message: Information is included above as you can see. 2001:EE0:4BC4:5DC0:74A5:B633:51B2:265D (talk) 11:58, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notify the readers that we are reading the article about chemical element.
Talk:Writing

message: I've marked this article's lead section as too long. LarstonMarston (talk) 14:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: A potential solution that would also enact some structural updates of interest to WikiProject:Writing could be to stop the lead after the current second paragraph. "Contents" could begin by merging the current section 2 (Tools and Materials) with a consolidated version of the distinction introduced in paragraphs 3 and 4 of the current header (i.e., collective and individual motivations for writing), which could then become sections 3 and 4 in their own right (with 4.1 - 4.5 becoming instructive examples of contemporary collective writing practices and 4.6-4.7 becoming examples of more individualized motivations for writing. Questions of the origins of and differences among different writing systems can be incorporated in the relevant history of collective writing systems, but readers interested in a more substantive account of archeological dimensions of can be referred to existing and already very thorough pages on History of Writing and Writing Systems. This page probably needs to serve readers more interested in the multiplex contemporary uses *of* writing. 
Compositionist (talk) 18:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Would agree w/ the suggestions above. LarstonMarston (talk) 18:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead length 

message: I removed the link to "activity" in the opening sentence per MOS:SOB and MOS:OL; is there a "particularly relevant" reason to link it? If so, could the link be moved? 
Incidentally, the first sentence's ending contradicts the last sentence of the lead, which defines a text. Whoever checks this could fix the links at the same time. CohenTheBohemian (talk) 15:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening line 

message: Education is very useful for student. 2402:3A80:4023:21CE:4E15:16CE:E55F:6B01 (talk) 06:36, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education 

message: — Assignment last updated by Bryceucsb (talk) 01:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Writing 2

message: In 1934 bloddy marry was and is not evil 67.81.8.127 (talk) 22:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  SECRET OF HISTROY
Talk:Bay of Pigs Invasion

message: I'm extremely inexperienced with Wikipedia, but I wanted to bring up a horrendous reference I found scanning this article today. 
Under Invasion day (17 April) the article states "Osvaldo Ramírez (leader of the rural resistance to Castro) was captured by Castro's forces in Aromas de Velázquez, and immediately executed." and the reference for this (165) goes to the landing page of what you could charitably describe as an amateurishly hosted independent commentary website that is extremely biased, and I cannot find any mention of Osvaldo Ramírez on that page. Should this line not be removed? 
Mitchromley (talk) 18:16, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best way to discuss poor referencing? 

message: * Erick Soares3 (talk) 18:44, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Security Archive 

message: The Brigade 2506 was created after JFK became President. Why was it created? I cannot answer that,
but I know one thing for sure, the whole plan hinged after the Brigade was organized, after JFK became President, in having air control; meaning NO Castro’s planes would be flying because our Air Force would have destroyed them prior to our landing at Playa Girón and Playa Larga where the heaviest fought took place.
In Playa Larga heavy tank battles took place that evening and I don’t know if José Fajardo and his tank were there because we didn’t talk to tank crews, so heavy was the fight. I can only say that they fought bravely and I always be thankful….and José Fajardo was one tank commander. 2601:58A:8700:3760:803D:DBB5:A302:4D2D (talk) 00:14, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misconceptions and how they are reflected in your “history” 

message: I think the way in which the Belligerents under the Quick Facts section are laid out is incorrect. I don't know how to fix it, if someone could fix it, that would be good. MiloWallace07 (talk) 11:27, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @MiloWallace07 Agreed, needs fixing for those last few rows CommandAShepard (talk) 07:53, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belligerents are placed wrongly
Talk:List of World Chess Championships

message: World Chess Championship 1886 claims that Steinitz wanted the US flag placed beside him. Did he get it?
If he did, then there is an inconsistency with regards to flags: Nepomniachtchi 2021 is not given the Russian flag, because even though he's Russian he didn't play under it; but Steinitz 1886 is given the Austro-Hungarian flag, which he didn't play under despite that being his country. Of course, if he didn't, then there's no problem. Double sharp (talk) 10:04, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if this is the right place to put this, but under "Other", in the 1992 match with Boris Spassky and Bobby Fischer, Spassky has a French flag instead of a Russian one. A fenian (talk) 02:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's correct: Spassky became a French citizen in 1978. Double sharp (talk) 04:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

text: I've been mulling over how to best present the flags. In any case, would it be uncontroversial that we should probably not primarily display the FIDE flag for country-punishing purposes? Remsense聊 18:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think that we should be consistent about always showing the flag the players actually played with. So the recent championships should show Nepo with the FIDE flag, but Steinitz 1886 should also get the USA flag and Kasparov 1990 the Russian tricolour. Double sharp (talk) 05:12, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as long as it's consistent to some schema. That would be the easiest, I would support that. Remsense聊 19:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flags 

message: Should time control be included in the "Format" column? I had a hard enough time sourcing the locations of every game, but at least time controls wouldn't change from match to match. Remsense诉 08:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time control 

message: The section headers for Predecessor events, Privately organized matches, Fide World Championships (1948-1990), Split title, and Fide World Championships (2006-present) have, between them, approximately zero citations, but lots of material that could be challenged. Bruce leverett (talk) 21:59, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Bruce leverett, I allowed myself to write the prose extemporaneously and cite it later, though it's a bad habit—I was just getting to putting citations in as we speak. — Remsense诉 22:05, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Bruce leverett, I think I'm almost ready to submit it as a FLC. What do you think? — Remsense诉 04:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Much improved. Bruce leverett (talk) 16:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: The event happened in the City of Baguio not Manila, get it right. 120.29.69.128 (talk) 02:58, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  You are correct and the page has been updated. Quale (talk) 05:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Chess Championship 1978
Talk:Manila

message: Should we have COVID-19 pandemic subtitle as part of health or history? Sarge Da2 (talk) 14:30, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  COVID-19 Pandemic 

message: The redirect Maynilad has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:33, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Maynilad]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I'm aware that there is already a disclaimer at the beginning of the article, but wouldn't it make more sense to add the "City" designation next to it so that readers avoid confusing it for NCR as a whole? Just Your Average Stellaron Hunter (talk) 08:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article to "Manila City"
Talk:Manila hemp

message: This article needs work.  It states that manila is not hemp and then that it was banned with hemp.  It gives no history or use.  The 3rd paragraph looks like it was copied from the hemp page and not adapted for this one.  --Karuna8 02:35, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a reference for this?  The article states that it is a small quantity but if you go to any hardware store you can still find Manila Rope.  So which is it?  Is it only used for the Navy or is it a small quantity?  Sales must be strong enough if you can still find it in stores - even Walmart has it!  I think you are confusing Manila Rope with Hemp Rope which is mostly used now in nautical circles (U.S. Navy included).Dbroer (talk) 17:17, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: Two articles on the same topic; no opinion on which title should be used fro the resulting page – abacá is older, Manila hemp is English Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: These are duplicate articles titled under synonyms, that much is obvious. This can not be the merger destination because the other article is much more developed. That, more developed, article has to be the destination. The issue of whether Abacá should be moved to Manila hemp is then an issue for a requested move discussion. I think that there are two options: (1) we just boldly do the merge without waiting for further input because of how obvious this is, or: (2) this discussion gets moved to the appropriate page, which is Talk:Abacá. —Alalch E. 16:35, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, . I'm not sure where the "much more developed" reasoning comes from, but as I said I've no opinion on which title the final page should sit at. This discussion is on an appropriate page, the talk-page of one of the articles for which a merge is proposed, but where no target page is specified; the merge notice at :Abacá links correctly to this discussion (I've just checked). It's fine with me if you want to go ahead and carry out the merge, and I think there's been a reasonable amount of time for others to comment (unless we have some hard-and-fast rule that I don't know about about how long a merge proposal needs to stay open?). Regards, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

text: Thank you very much.—Alalch E. 21:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, thanks to both  and ! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:01, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Abacá]] with [[Manila hemp]]
Talk:Lists of men's association football players

message: Why has someone found it necessary to include every single player from the us women's team? I bet most football fans have never heard of any of them. They may be famous with a fringe group but don't belong in a list of greats like Maradona, Pele, Cruijff etc.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs) 
:Only some of the players from that team have been listed.  The readers of sports magazine whose cover featured those players might disagree with you.  Please refrain from inflamtory remarks on talk pages.  Deebki 01:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  US women players? 

message: You may be interested to find discussion on whether and how to keep this and similar lists at WikiProject Football.  --Pkchan 03:45, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of all footballers, renowned footballers, and footballers by position 

message: #01 lionel messi
#02 cristiano ronaldo
#03 kaka
#04 ibrahimovic
#05 vidic
#06 iniesta
#07 torres
#08 ribery
#09 casilas
#10 gerrard
some other players only just missed out like david villia, eto'o, sneijder, rooney, xavi, ferdinand....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.148.254.123 (talk) 21:54, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  top 10 football players in the world
Talk:February 16

message: ----
1983 Ash Wednesday bushfires in Australia killed 75. http://geog.tamu.edu/sarah/australia/bushfires.pdf
1907 Melvin Burkhart, “the Human Blockhead” (d. December 2001), American performer who could drive a five-inch nail or an ice pick into his head without flinching
Obit: http://www.smh.com.au/news/0112/19/entertainment/entertain101.html
Oy.  I had put Pete Postlethwaite in the wrong spot on the page, and I had thought I had fixed it.  Somehow it didn't stay fixed.  :) -- Zoe
"1989 - Kate Peckham, quite possibly the coolest person alive."  -  Self aggrandisement or romantic tribute? I'll go out on a limb and say Hi Kate. 203.62.236.200 07:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello, I wanted to point out that major incorrect statement on this page namely Kim Jong Il in 1942 was born. 
Source: http://www.kcna.co.jp/item/2010/201002/news22/20100222-01ee.html
No problem helping here, we must correct falsehoods through work. Only be reading the truth can we inform ourselves.ProgressiveThinker (talk) 02:09, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See this reliable source for explanation of his year of birth.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 02:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kim Jong Il in 1942 not 1941 born!!! 

message: Hi folks, just a "heads up" that American R & B singer James Ingram appears twice on the February 16 birthday list -- 1952 and 1956. I'm not sure if there is ongoing debate as to his birth year or if it's just simple oversight but I figured someone who deals with the list regularly might wish to investigate and correct. Have a great Wiki kind of day! Sector001 (talk) 18:24, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  James Ingram listed twice
Talk:Safari (web browser)

message: The "Failure to adopt modern standards" section has 2 sources. One is now out of date and includes a correction in one place. The other source deals with Apple's policy of forcing browser on iOS to use webkit, the rendering engine Apples develops for Safari. This section should either include more recent evidence of Apple's poor support of standards, possibly plus some text indicating specific standards that they either implemented late or have not implemented. Or if the issue is mainly about refusing to allow another web rendering engine on iOS, then it should be titled differently, and perhaps expand upon why it's valuable to allow competing engines.Rjjiii (talk) 02:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failure to adopt modern standards 
Talk:February 17

message: ----
I do not believe a "Caitlin Sutton's" birthday is particularly news worthy, especially when it's put with no year before the year 1500 Battle of Hemmingstedt -- Alison  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.60.91.189 (talk) 16:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The date articles are meant to list events of the past.  It is speculation until it actually happens.  Scheduled or not, it is a future event and therefore does not belong.  Another thing is that events can't be judged as globally notable until after they have taken place.  They are not historically significant until they are history.  For all we know there might be some massive uprising that causes the event to be delayed.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 20:53, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

text: It has been changed back already. Lectonar (talk) 14:08, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

message: I think that the beginning of the Sino-Vietnamese War, which started 30 years ago in 1979, is a much more important event than any of those currently listed. See these articles commemorating the event. DHN (talk) 18:47, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sino-Vietnamese War

message: Removed this: "In Christianity, this is the predicted date for the beginning of the flood, of Genesis", which is referring to 
Genesis 7:11: "In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened." (Per King James Bible in Wikisource - 
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Bible_(King_James)/Genesis#Chapter_7 )This is misleading and badly linked: The date given in the Bible text is of the "actual" rather than "predicted" date, and the link is to flood (about floods in general), rather than to the better Great_Flood_(Biblical)#Jewish.But more importantly, the authors of Genesis would not have been using the modern Gregorian calendar, so the date referred to would presumably have been the 17th of Iyar. (See http://www.google.com/search?q=noah+iyar )-- Writtenonsand (talk) 16:35, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Noah's Flood 

message: Isn't presidents day on the 17th?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickmxp (talk • contribs) 11:49, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  President's day? 

message: Continuing the ongoing effort to reduce the size of the Births and Deaths sections to make them manageable, I'm removing celebrities with few or no articles in other wikipedias, moving the entries to the appropriate Year in Topic article if they were not already present. This is in accordance with the guidelines. Deb (talk) 11:09, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth and death entries
Talk:TRIPOS

message: Three capitalizations appear in this article: TripOS, TRIPOS, and Tripos. Which is the canonical form? --Brion 05:13 Feb 18, 2003 (UTC)
:As well as being consistent in this article, it might be a good idea to disambiguate with brackets (as normal) rather than relying on the different capitalisations. Although the current distinction between Tripos and TRIPOS works, it seems to have strange effects on browser history, not to mention being a bit non-intuitive. - IMSoP 19:08, 6 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization of "TRIPOS"