lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Non-communicable disease

message: Whatever definition of 'disease' is being used. It should be given in the article. Alec - U.K. 15:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: For this claim: Efforts focused on better diet and increased physical activity have been shown to control the prevalence of NCDs  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.92.38.139 (talk) 14:39, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs citation 

message: The 'further reading' section could be completed with a recent and open-access reference:
* Nick Banatvala and Pascal Bovet (editors), Noncommunicable Diseases: A Compendium (2023), Routledge,  (open access).
2001:171B:C9BC:65F0:BC01:F05A:B81A:CE0B (talk) 21:30, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Judkessler (talk) 19:52, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further reading 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jz5863 (talk) 15:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 202 - Thu
Talk:The Truth About Jane and Sam

message: This film needs a film infobox before it should be reassessed to start. --Nehrams2020 09:22, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub to start
Talk:Parnassius imperator

message: This article was originally about a subspecies. It was renamed as a species article, without any changes to the information previously about the subspecies, and that information persists as the primary information about the species. I think all of that information should be deleted, listed explicitly as referring only to a single subspecies, or have the information reverified and referenced with inline sources. I'm adding the "disputed" template to the article. --Agyle (talk) 14:02, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, it's just a few sentences...I'm just going to delete them, and see if I can find a source for anything to replace it. --Agyle (talk) 14:02, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable accuracy
Talk:Pearl-bordered fritillary

message: This is a UK Biodiversity Action Plan species—GRM 15:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance rating 

message: The photograph is of a Small Pearl-bordered Fritillary - chevrons on the edge of the wings. Triangles in Pearl-bordered.
Jowaninpensans (talk) 22:06, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph
Talk:Pelopidas mathias

message: It is found throughout much of Southeast and East Asia, and as far as the Philippines.
Shouldn't it read - It is found throughout much of Southeast and East Asia, and as far south as the Philippines. ?
I'm afraid to edit it myself, as a newbie, so whomever cares about this article is bid to consider this suggestion. Marmel2 (talk) 13:41, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Directional edit
Talk:Phalanta phalantha

message: The genus for the Common Leopard (Phalanta phalantha) is Phalanta and not Phalantha. Please change the heading and page name suitably.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sets/d_momaya 20:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing out the glaring error. Fixed. Shyamal 07:54, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong genus 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Common Leopard Phalanta phalantha.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 11, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-02-11. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:15, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Common Leopard Phalanta phalantha.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Polygonia interrogationis

message: This page is a good start to an interesting species. However, there are a few pointers I would like to point out. Primarily, there needs to be more hyperlinks throughout the article. One of the best features of a Wikipedia article is the ability to venture out into various topics at the click of a button. Not having hyperlinks demands that more work be done explaining key terms like "instar," which can be tedious.
Also, avoid using phrases such as "beautiful butterfly." Encyclopedic entries do not read like this and should come across as objective as possible.
Lastly, I think a section on the behavior of the Question Mark would be great. Why is camouflaged? What predators does it interact with? What plants does it feed on? Why does it live in wooded areas with open spaces? Ecampell22 (talk) 04:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stylistic Tips for a Better Article
Talk:Polyommatinae

message: For the Oriental Polyommatinae, the works of Eliot, 1973, Eliot & Kawazoe, 1983, and Hirowatari, 1992, are authoritative, especially in respect of the Polyommatini. I have marked many genera previously considered 'doubtful or incertae sedis on this page but which I consider to be definitively within the Polyommatini. I will return later to this page and remove from doubt the genera so marked, unless another contributor has strong substantiated opinions on why these genera should not be accepted in the Polyommatini. ACCassidy (talk) 16:27, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Incertae sedis'' and Doubtful Genera
Talk:Polyommatus

message: Perhaps it is worth noting that the famed author Vladimir Nabokov was also an expert in the study of this group.
“In 1945, the study of butterfly genitalia led Nabokov to his most daring scientific hypothesis, on the relationship between Old World and New World blues. Nabokov believed that blues of the genus Polyommatus had originated in Asia, moved through Siberia to the Bering Strait, and headed south to the New World, eventually reaching as far as Chile. Few professionals took his theory seriously at the time, but in 2011 DNA evidence proved him right.”
https://www.newyorker.com/tech/annals-of-technology/vladimir-nabokov-butterfly-illustrator
https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/01/science/01butterfly.html?_r=0&mtrref=undefined&gwh=4B7734AC1954009BA038B4EE1C7DDAE7&gwt=pay
I find it interesting, but it may be considered trivial to others. 
The notability of such research does indeed lie in the status of the person making the claim, and his accomplishments outside of Lepidopterologica. 
Any second opinions?
 Genetikbliss (talk) 20:12, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nabokov’s theory of evolution
Talk:Charaxes agrarius

message: What's so anomalous about it? Dysmorodrepanis 23:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably because it looked different from the Common Nawab. Hope someone else can fill in on it. Some of the butterfly common name are quite puzzling. Shyamal 11:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Prioneris sita

message: Upperside: white, with a slight glaucous or greenish tint.
Fore and hind wings: the postdiscal markings of the underside seen through faintly by transparency; all the veins of the forwing from the base, and the veins of the hind wing on the outer third margined narrowly with black, that towards the terminal margin broadens, coalesces and forms a band on the extreme margin; on the fore wing this is comparatively broad and the black markings more or less triangular; at each vein on the hind wing the band is reduced to mere black lines, slightly broader anteriorly than posteriorly.
Underside: fore wing  white, costa black, apex suffused with yellow; all the veins from the base broadly with black that does not expand towards their apices; an ill- defined transverse, somewhat diffuse, postdiscal black band from veins 1 to 7. 
Hind wing: rich chrome-yellow up to a postdiscal band, beyond which the ground-color is white with a series of large terminal vermillion-red rectangular ot truncated cone-shaped spots; veins from base bordered somewhat narroly but conspicuously with black. 
Antennae brownish black, head and thorax clothed with long bluish-grey hairs, abdomen glaucous white; beneath: the palpi and thorax greyish white, abdomen white. 
Female. Very similiar, the black edgings to the veins on the fore and hind wings on both upper and under sides broader; on the upperside the veins of the hind wing as well as of the fore being black right up to the base.
Upperside: fore and hind with a well-marked dusky black postdiscal diffuse band; cell of the fore wing transversed by three slender longitudinal black lines.
Underside: the yellow and vermillion tints brighter than in the male.
Exp. male,female 86-90 mm (3.40-3.55").
Hab. Southern India; Ceylon.
Larva. "Color dull blue-green. Head and all the segments dotted with minute blue tubercles, those on the head and sides black-tipped; dorsal surface pubescent; a lateral fringe of the soft white hairs below the spiralces. Feeds on the Capparis."
Pupa. " Bright green. Sharply pointed at the head, with two strong lateral points and keeled on the dorsal surface of the thoracic segments; an interrupted yellow dorsal line, and a short curved crimson line on each side below the thoracic segemnts bordering a small white irregular black speckled spot." (E.E. Green, MS. note as quoted by Moore.)
--Viren 16:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bingham description
Talk:Apatura iris

message: I've strengthened the text and added references from the 'usual suspects', plus the important monograph on the species by Heslop et al..  It should be reviewed to see if it's no longer stub class.
I think this particular butterfly species should be of 'medium' importance to the Wiki Lepidoptera project because of its iconic status (it appears on the covers of several important UK butterfly books, including South) and the fact that it appears to be an 'indicator species' of woodland habitat quality in southern England and Wales. What do you think? --Wally Tharg (talk) 20:26, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs review
Talk:Purple hairstreak

message: DISTRIBUTION
In the 1950s, I remember not only seeing purple hairstreaks in Los Angeles, California, but also collecting them there.  My brother just sent me an E-mail message containing an attached photo of a female purple hairstreak that he photographed this week.  He lives in Oakland, California.  
DERoss (talk) 02:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Ringlet

message: Haven't most people dropped the seemingly unnecessary definite article "The"? I suggest reversion to "Ringlet"—GRM (talk) 19:45, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I know nothing about the subject, so am unprepared to do the edit myself,
but it looks as though the listed carex sylvatic, carex panice and lilium effusum are
misprints for carex sylvatica, carex panicea and milium effusum respectively.
Would someone please check and edit if appropriate? Wellset (talk) 13:02, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Larval food plant misspellings?
Talk:Ivan Heng

message: There is a current RFC on certain content in Singapore artistes BLP articles that editors watching/editing/passing through this article may be interested in weighing in: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs. This article may be affected due to the inclusion of :Category:Singaporean actors‎ and/or one of its subcategories in the article. RobertskySemi (talk) 23:52, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs
Talk:Hesperia comma

message: I don't think thats a female I think its a diffrent species entirely but im not 100% sure. -- IvanTortuga 02:04, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: I'd like to suggest that for the benefit of the North American English speakers, we relocate this page to the scientific name – given that "Silver-spotted Skipper" relates to different species on opposite sides of the Atlantic. What thinks you?—GRM (talk) 11:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Candidate for moving?
Talk:Siproeta stelenes

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Malachitfalter, Bambuspage, Siproeta stelenes 3.JPG will be appearing as picture of the day on April 19, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-04-19. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:01, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Malachitfalter, Bambuspage, Siproeta stelenes 3.JPG]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Speckled wood (butterfly)

message: I am confused by the following sentences:
Males have either 3 or 4 upper hindwing eyespots; the fourth spot shows only in flight. It appears that the 4-spotted morph tends towards patrolling behaviour to finds mates. This agrees with the probable function of the eyespots to entice predators like birds to aim for the wing margin (which may be damaged without much affecting the butterfly) rather than the body. On the other hand, habitat is apparently a major factor influencing mate-finding strategy as perching behavior is more common in males of conifer woodland, whereas males of meadows tend towards patrolling behavior.
The way it's written makes it unclear what agrees with the probable function of the eyespots. Do the four spot morphs only inhabit meadows? If so it would make more sense to rearrange this section with the bit about the probable function of the eyespots at the end. Richerman (talk) 23:26, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing sentences 

message: I am a student in a behavioral ecology course at Washington University in St. Louis. As part of this course, I will be editing this page, focusing mainly on behavior. Since the paragraph mentioned above was confusing, and I cover the topics mentioned extensively in my well research section, I have deleted the paragraph. Abuatois (talk) 00:19, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Behavior section

message: This article is not yet ready for GA assessment as, for a start, it immediately fails the requirements of WP:LEAD where it says "The lead serves as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important aspects...significant information should not appear in the lead if it is not covered in the remainder of the article.". For instance in the the lead section it says that the speckled wood is "found in and on the borders of woodland areas throughout much of the Palearctic ecozone" but this is not mentioned in the Habitat section and is not referenced.  The lead then goes on to talk about subspecies that are not discussed later in the article. The lead should be a summary of what is in the article and should not be full of information that is not given elsewhere. Also, nominations can only be made by registered users so, as this one was made by an anonymous IP, I've withdrawn it. Richerman   (talk) 18:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is not ready for GA assessment yet  
Talk:Papilio troilus

message: Gotta catch them all  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.125.200.34 (talk) 21:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Important

message: Not positive this is a swallowtail but looks very similar.
Spicebush_swallowtail.ogv
Spicebush_Swallowtail_butterfly.jpg
Jhansonxi (talk) 21:29, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: New video and picture available

message: Hey I updated the page with some of my research. Cheers. Clericuzion (talk) 07:18, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: A couple new changes

message: Excuse me? Do people eat these things? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.127.147.7 (talk) 07:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edible? 

message: WHT DOES THE MISSISSIPPI SYMBOLIZES?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.59.92.84 (talk) 02:21, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHAT IS THE MEAN OF THE MISSISSIPPI BUTTERFLY 

message: #REDIRECT spicebush swallowtail caterpillar
the caterpillar and the world is the spicebush swallowtail caterpillar. spicebush swallowtail caterpillar is the meding caterpillar.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.228.10.236 (talk) 19:04, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  spicebush swallowtail caterpillar 

message: How many eggs will an adult lay?  I didn't see it in the article.Robinrobin (talk) 22:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  eggs
Talk:Spread-winged skipper

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Mafa Sandman Spialia mafa.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 29, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-08-29. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:07, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Mafa Sandman Spialia mafa.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Taractrocera ceramas

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Taractrocera ceramas Tamil Grass Dart by kadavoor.JPG will be appearing as picture of the day on September 14, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-09-14. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:34, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Taractrocera ceramas Tamil Grass Dart by kadavoor.JPG]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Beer Judge Certification Program

message: Here's an example of recent media coverage of BJCP, demonstrating notability. http://www.bakercityherald.com/news/story.cfm?story_no=4260
BJCP is a significant part of modern homebrewing practice and discussion.
I'm not sure what NPOV problems the previous commenter saw, but I'd oppose deletion of the article on either NPOV or notability grounds. -m —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.236.99.120 (talk • contribs) 20:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The BJCP is not the primary subject to the article, though; WP:ORG says that BJCP should be the primary subject, and there should be several significant publications on the organization.  I'm going to say that the Baker City, Oregon paper also does not qualify as a major publication. —C.Fred (talk) 22:12, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  BJCP in the press 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/83.161.192.227  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nomoresoxforu (talk • contribs) 21:17, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ron Pattinson has a new sockpuppet
Template talk:Butterfly-stub

message: The redirect Template:Butterfly has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  1234qwer1234qwer4 15:51, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Template:Butterfly]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Garuda Indonesia Flight 152

message: Please note that the content currently contained in the "investigation" portion of the article references a third-party air incident website, which notes two primary causes from an NTSB report. However, after reviewing the NTSB archives, I found that no such report was made, nor had an official NTSB investigation taken place for the incident. Additionally, I have been unable to find any official, publicly-releasd report from the Indonesian Safety Board, effectively rendering the section unverifiable, and potentially factually inaccurate (since it references an official report that was never made). As such, I deleted the section. Since then, my deletion was reverted, as it deleted referenced material, and I have brought up the matter on the talk page of the editor who reverted it. If I have missed anything in my searching for an official NTSB report, please let me know. --Hunterm267Talk 06:14, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Investigation Category 

message: The table of numbers of victims has an error.  If you add up the total victims column, it adds up to 236.  Multiple other places including the stated total show 234 total. 75.70.149.252 (talk) 00:35, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table of victims has error
Talk:Tirumala limniace

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Blue tiger (Tirumala limniace exoticus) male underside.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for March 6, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-03-06. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 14:21, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Tan Kheng Hua

message: There is a current RFC on certain content in Singapore artistes BLP articles that editors watching/editing/passing through this article may be interested in weighing in: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs. This article may be affected due to the inclusion of :Category:Singaporean actors‎ and/or one of its subcategories in the article. RobertskySemi (talk) 00:02, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs
Talk:Telecommunications in Nepal

message: Guys we need to tell reader that Nepal officially uses Bikram Samat instead of AD  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bclub13 (talk • contribs) 14:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kantipur Publications

message: He is three citizenship holder of nepal. He is an indian not nepali. He have both indian & nepali citizen. 2405:ACC0:1100:1A12:B1F9:AE22:4FA2:AE6F (talk) 11:42, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 11:44, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 May 2024
Talk:Daniel Ducarme

message: This article was abridged from :fr:Daniel Ducarme. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 16:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation notice
Talk:.np

message: What's the story with :File:Dotnp.jpg? Is this some official national image? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:17, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Aileen Tan

message: There is a current RFC on certain content in Singapore artistes BLP articles that editors watching/editing/passing through this article may be interested in weighing in: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs. This article may be affected due to the inclusion of :Category:Singaporean actors‎ and/or one of its subcategories in the article. RobertskySemi (talk) 23:41, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs
Talk:Asian Airlines

message: The name "Asian Airlines" was taken from the Shanghai Pudong airport website. It was paired with the code D7 so the airport meant Air Asia X. It is probably a translation of the airline's Chinese name
WhisperToMe (talk) 20:18, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig 
Talk:Andrew Seow

message: There is a current RFC on certain content in Singapore artistes BLP articles that editors watching/editing/passing through this article may be interested in weighing in: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs. This article may be affected due to the inclusion of :Category:Singaporean actors‎ and/or one of its subcategories in the article. RobertskySemi (talk) 23:44, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC on content in Notes column of filmography tables in Singapore artistes BLPs