Talk:List of rhythm guitarists

message: I've gone through the list one by one and some people here aren't  rhythm guitarists.  Not sure what to do as I don’t want to be accused of vandalism - can someone who knows more about the subject help?  (INXS-Girl  17:29, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this makes me a dork, but as a musician I'm a nitpicker about things like this, and I gave up on this page, INXS-Girl. If you look at my comments above, I started out doing some editing and removed a few people who were definitely not rhythm guitarists, but people keep adding new names to this list and I'm pretty sure they're just doing it to see the names of people that are in bands they like on the list; either that or they are counting lead guitarists who SOMETIMES play rhythm or have a highly rhythmic style (but are still lead guitarists). I gave up editing the page and now I just rant on the talk page, which I'm pretty sure no one pays any attention to. If you want to take some names off the list, go for it, just try to justify it somehow on the talk page or the edit summary and hopefully you won't be accused of vandalism as long as you have a good reason to back up your edits. Cris Varengo 20:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've been pulling my hair out over the guitarists, drummers and lead singers pages, cleaning them up getting rid of vandalism (I spent 4 hours solid working on them a few weeks ago.) I think it's time to give up too. And no you're not a dork, you're like me; you work at something and then wonder why on Earth you bothered. It's just that little voice that keeps saying "Go back and see if the page is OK." But in the end I'm sure the place will carry on with or without us. (INXS-Girl 20:11, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

text:  Very true. The grammar alone in some of these articles drives me nuts, but what can you do. Anyone can come on this site and edit. That's both the beauty and the downfall of Wikipedia. I'd say overall it's still pretty reliable, as long as people like you and I outnumber the people putting misinformation on here. But with pages like this one, it's hard to keep up, isn't it? :) Cris Varengo 20:31, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not rhythm guitarists

message: If we start doing that isn't the page going to get too long and out of control like the other guitarists pages? Thanks INXS-Girl 13:07, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a ridiculous template. It's just a list. Refs not req'd. I rm'd the stupid tag(stupid being an understatement) earlier, but a "tag-happy editor" stuck it back on. Wikipedia has 2 "scourge of quality" editing types. 'Inclusionists' and 'Taggers'. And a 'no ref' tag on, what is essentially, a simple list... is anal and unrequired. And consensus leans to that now. 156.34.142.110 13:24, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cite References Sources

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of rhythm guitarists. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111021185726/http://www.luth.org/backissues/al69-72/al72.htm to http://www.luth.org/backissues/al69-72/al72.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:52, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion