lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:D. A. Rajapaksa

message: Hey people,
I don't like engaging in any edit fights any more. But this section is almost unwillingly funny in its feet-lickyness ...
Quote: "D. A. Rajapaksa, through his exemplary political career and through wise counselling by his beloved wife Palatuwe Dandina Dissanayake, has guided his children over pitfalls and over rough terrain which politicians encounter in pursuing their objectives. It is up to Chamal, Mahinda and Basil, who also have taken to politics, to live up to his expectations and maintain the dignity and decorum which their father had cultivated even while being a politician."
Most reasonable people should be able to see what I am getting at without my clumsy italics. In my opinion, we should change this article for the better.
Cheers, Krankman (talk) 03:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel Fun
Talk:Leader of the Opposition (Sri Lanka)

message: Why does the leader of the  opposition not move a Notion of No confidence in the ruling party And this way have the current party removed then dissolve Parliament. And hold freah ekwctions And let the people decide. The stooges Will not go any other way. Other alternativw is To bring in Martial Law. 49.193.134.13 (talk) 02:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re current economic crisis
Talk:Mahinda Samarasinghe

message: good  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.228.190.198 (talk) 01:04, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1993 Giro d'Italia

message: The route for the 1993 Giro was unveiled on Saturday 14 November 1992, and had fewer time trials than the 1992 Giro, something that Chiappucci had requested. source (in Dutch). --EdgeNavidad (Talk · Contribs) 17:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route
Talk:Prime Minister of Sri Lanka

message: The current Prime Minister of Sri Lanka is Hon. Mahinda Rajapakshe not Hon. Ranil Wickramasinghe. This shoi;d be changed immediately. Please make your attention as soon as possible. Manowiki94 (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. Please take this up at WP:SRI LANKA. —KuyaBriBriTalk 13:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2018 

message: The Prime Minister is now the Mr. Mahinda Rajapaksa as changed by the president, his excellency, My Maithreepala Sirisena with his right as per the 9th Amendment. Please be kind enough to read the Sinhala version of the Sri Lankan constitution. Sinhala is the official language of Sri Lanka. Ethertoair (talk) 07:16, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. Please take this up at WP:SRI LANKA. —KuyaBriBriTalk 13:29, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2018 

message: Sachithsuraweera (talk) 11:00, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 13:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 November 2018 

message: Please change article to fully protected until January 5, 2019.
: Not done: requests for increases to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 15:46, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Full-protected edit request on 18 November 2018 

message: Mr Mahinda Rajapaksa is no longer Prime Ministera  of Sri Lanka.Sri Lanka's Parliament passes no-confidence vote against Prime Minister Rajapaksa.See Please change "since 26 October 2018" to  "26 October 2018 to 14 Novemeber 2018" 112.134.44.171 (talk) 17:59, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. DannyS712 (talk) 20:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 November 2018  

message: Why prime minister of sri lanka is the second most powerful? What are motives behind the  constitution amandement of 1978?2404:8000:1027:85F6:5C43:2F1E:AAC8:6459 (talk) 05:48, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why and Motive
Talk:PPM

message: On July 1, 2007, Daniel Cardenas removed a number of PPM references, citing that some were "less notable" than others. May I ask, is Daniel an expert on all things PPM? How would one determine notability of different PPM meanings w/o doing lengthy studies on each and every one? What criteria does one person use to determine "notability" of subjects not in their field? Google hits? 
I'm afraid there is nobody on the planet who can adequately determine "notability" of each and every use of the acronym "PPM" (or any popular acronym, for that matter). As such, I suggest that any listing of PPM be maintained w/o removal if it can be shown in usage (somewhere, anywhere), is not advertising or overtly commercial, is encyclopedic in nature, and does not violate Wikipedia conventions. 
If Daniel, or anyone else, wants to remove PPM listings from this list, they should explain exactly why they are doing it, and by what criteria they are using. 
75.104.160.39 21:39, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable Entries?

message: Can we get someone to add categories to this page?
Similar to other "Could refer to..." pages - Computing, Science, People; as required.
: It used to be like that, until it was changed to the present format on 18 June 2010. There aren't enough entries to justify categorisation, IMHO. There were several headings with only one entry, and any such taxonomy is arbitrary anyway. It didn't make entries easier to find. I say leave it as it is.--Harumphy (talk) 10:06, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  we can also decrease the amount of categories.  I added a few.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.203.160.34 (talk) 06:59, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  moved some management topics to the management category 2lucky (talk) 13:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization
Talk:UEFA Euro 1992 squads

message: Vladimir Liuty and Andrei Ivanov are the only players not to be included in this category. They're both currently without articles.  slυмgυм [ ←→ ] 21:41, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Chanheigeorge 22:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Outstanding articles
Talk:Ratnasiri Wickremanayake

message: I've nominated this article at  Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#RD:_Ratnasiri_Wickremanayake. —MBlaze Lightning T 06:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at [[Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#RD:_Ratnasiri_Wickremanayake]] 
Talk:Rachel Gatina

message: The "Quotes" section is overly long and should be moved to Wikiquote.  If possible, can someone please sort it out by episode (due to structure at the Wikiquote article) and move it here?  We will then add a link on this article to the Wikiquote entry.  Thank you.  Redux 21:57, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: quotes

message: Rachel Gatina is the very hot new girl at Tree Hill High School in season three is 'the very hot new girl' such a fixture on teen dramas that it's actually a role description, or is this just another personal opinion that made it into wikipedia? Boombaard (talk) 22:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL. Not sure who wrote that. It was probably some random IP. Anything that you can do to improve this article is much welcomed, of course. Flyer22 (talk) 07:55, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: writing style
Talk:Huj, Gaza Subdistrict, Mandatory Palestine

message: There might have been a slip-up somewhere here; this is what SWP, 1881,  p.260 say about Huj: "A small mud village on flat ground. It has a well some 200 feet deep. It is named from Nebi Huj."
And this is what Khalidi write, sourced to SWP, III:260: "In the late nineteeth century, Huj had a rectangular layout and adobe brick structures."
Hmmm; methinks there has been a small mixup somewhere...Regards, Huldra (talk) 01:04, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I say we go with the original source, the SWP. Khalidi must have made a mistake. --Al Ameer son (talk) 02:28, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, will do.Huldra (talk) 02:41, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Khalidi, SWP
Talk:Killay, County Tyrone

message: Is a hometown the same as a town? Biscuittin 22:02, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bora (Australian)

message: Now we have a new article Poles in mythology, Please see and include suitable improvements , if any, in article  Poles in mythology.
Rgds
Mahitgar (talk) 09:16, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poles in mythology 

message: Why is this in :Category:Ancient astronomy, :Category:Archaeoastronomy and :Category:Earth mysteries? Nothing in the article text seems to me to suggest that either the ceremony or the rings have anything to do with astronomy or Earth mysteries. (Mystery is not the same as mysticism.) Daß Wölf (talk) 20:15, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:Marjorie Wallace (SANE)

message: The title of this article seems a bit ambiguous. If she's primarily an author and journalist perhaps the article should be Marjorie Wallace (writer). Putting the letters SANE after her name doesn't describe who she is. Any thoughts?--Tuzapicabit (talk) 10:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be 'Marjorie Wallace (Charity worker)' Valetude (talk) 11:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: Can you please add the information given in the interview with Marjorie Wallice taken by Dr Anthony Clare on the 14th of May 2014 in the BBC Programme In the Psychiatrist's Chair? http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b007519z (Achim)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AchimBaatzsch (talk • contribs) 04:32, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC: In the Psychiatrist's Chair 

message: This article was rewritten by  who I have determined operates a reputation management company. SmartSE (talk) 15:48, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undisclosed paid editing
Talk:Money train

message: This looks like one of those articles created just to prevent an element of popular culture being the default article. Surely if this is genuine it should be under the disambigulation. The film Money Train should replace it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.5.202 (talk) 23:11, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong default article
Talk:Switcheroo

message: While after reading the whole article the concept becomes more or less clear, the article lacks clear definition. Xuz (talk) 17:27, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition 

message: Posting here for conversation in case it doesn't belong here, but I believe the sub-genre of comedies (and less commonly thrillers) involving body/mind switching belongs as a section here. After the word has gained currency as a generic variation on a "switch" I've seen it used to refer to movies using some variation of this. Freaky Friday, The Change-Up, etc. JesseRafe (talk) 20:03, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Switcheroo films
Talk:Olimpia Maidalchini

message: It would be most correct to list her name as Olimpia Maidalchini Pamphilj in the title entry area since she lived most of her life as a member of the Pamphilj family and is best-known today in scholarly circles as a leader of that family. Kanani Pukalani (talk) 23:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

message: The text currently states, "Right after Innocent's body was removed on 29 December, she entered the chamber, removed the chests, and then ran to her palace to lock herself in fear of what angry mobs could do to her".  Where was his body removed from?  Where was it removed to?  Innocent was still alive on December 29.  He did not die until the night between January 6 and January 7.  On Friday, 1 January 1645, Mass was said in the Pope's sickroom at the Quirinal Palace.  The same was done on January 6, and the Pope received Extreme Unction.  He was not alone.Vicedomino (talk) 12:45, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Pope on 29 December 1644
Talk:Hofmann rearrangement

message: Hofmann degradation redirrect to this page. But i thought that it was hofmann elimination which was the same as Hofmann degradation. Does anyone know if its both the rearrangement and the elimination which is reffered to as the degradation? ChristianB 22:35, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Does anyone know the full mechanism for this reaction? The equation included doesn't make it particularly clear what is going on. Nacnud89 (talk) 10:08, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanism? 

message: Including the carboxyl carbon (drawing it with a C) in the left hand side of the formulas would make them easier to apprehend.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.227.15.253 (talk) 08:44, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reaction formulas 

message: It's called Hoffmann with a 'ff' in the scientific community; because of you scientists and serious researchers don't support even cited Wikipedia articles. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=oAlxIVRzrN8C&pg=PA1308&lpg=PA1308&dq=hoffmann+bromamide+descending+reaction&source=bl&ots=P-G5eQjoI9&sig=jUMKGiAc5BRf92oFI1axITlidWw&hl=en&sa=X&ei=E-ZyVYSQFNDluQT21IrwAg&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=hoffmann%20bromamide%20descending%20reaction&f=false  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.200.118.31 (talk) 12:27, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Title 

message: add the topic 223.123.39.252 (talk) 13:02, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We have an article about the pinacol rearrangement. But how is that relevant here? DMacks (talk) 16:11, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pinacol-Pinaclone Rearrangement
Talk:Living torpedoes

message: The page for living torpedo should be merged into human torpedo. Both topics are remarkably similar. A distinction need only be made to differentiate kamikaze torpedoes versus those that simply deliver divers (frogmen). This merge has been discussed on the Talk page for Human torpedo as early as 2013, but has yet to receive any attention.
192.77.12.11 (talk) 06:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Paul V. Yoder

message: What's here so far sounds like an infomercial. 24.86.184.60 (talk) 10:21, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure how there is a point to "selling" him since he's dead, but rewrote the article anyway to source better and organize thoughts by headings.--Rwberndt (talk) 17:07, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: infomercial
Talk:Carol Barnes

message: This factoid is an error. The imdb page cited for On Her Majesty's secret Service  does not include this piece of information, nor can confirmation by found elsewhere on the web, something we can assume it would if true. The only reason to insert this nonsense is to fool the 'mainstream' media. Philip Cross (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well well, this claim seems to have appeared on imdb in the last few hours. In the Google cache of 2 March this information was absent. So my original point is (probably) still valid! Philip Cross (talk) 20:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Where there is doubt it stays out under WP:BLP. If this is true, then another source should be possible to confirm it.--Docg 22:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Not BLP any more but still and all if there is any doubt let us err on the side of caution. Thanks, SqueakBox 22:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bond film appearance

message: Is she the one who kept pronouncing 'Buenos Aires' as 'Buonas Aires'? The public thought she sounded pretty posh for a socialist. 86.144.67.80 (talk) 00:06, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accent 
Talk:Edward W. Hoch

message: Hi, although I am from Germany, I think there is a lot more to say about Mr. Hoch. Here is some material:
Edward W. Hoch signed the bill into law on January 30, 1907. The law abolished capital punishment in Kansas by prescribing life imprisonment, instead of the death penalty, as punishment An act to amend section 8, article 2, of chapter 31 of the general statues of 1901 
EDWARD W. HOCH BY MRS. EDITH CONNELLEY ROSS
Kansas Governor Edward Wallis Hoch
Good luck and best wishes--178.11.235.191 (talk) 08:53, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement 
Talk:Trey Williams (musician)

message: A noteworthy death-metal band (DF) has undergone a change in personell, and I was just creating the article so that people could read and know about it. It's apparently something that's just happened. I'm confused, however... How does it not "assert the importance" of itself? It's a personell lineup change!
Dark Executioner 23:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You would have to consult the template wizards for the reasons that "assert the importance" is in the templates.  I just try to use the correct templates.  You have ONE sentence that simple says he is now in the band, with no citations or other relevence that makes the entry noteworthy.  This should probably be added to the main article about the band as there is already a previous/current band member section for that in that article.  So far, the only thing "notable" he has done is join the band.  In short, what you have here is a press release, and Wikipedia isn't a blog, via WP:NOT#BLOG nor a list of persons per WP:NOT#DIR nor a news site.  It isn't personal, it is just that it would better be a paragraph in the band's article and isn't actually an "article".  Pharmboy 23:22, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Dying Fetus Drummer, Please Don't Delete Article 

message: At this point, the best I can see is to merge this one sentence into the main article of the band.  It simply isn't an article in and of itself.  Pharmboy 23:24, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is what the article is for.  Having the info spread over several articles is not better than having the info in one place.  And why would you have the "fate" of Duane Timlin in an article about Trey Williams anyway?  Outside of the context of the band, they have no meaning, thus the info belongs in the entry of the BAND where the information has context.  Pharmboy 17:47, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This redirect to section is currently broken -- the target section Dying Fetus#Trey Williams: Drums is nonextant. Request retargeting to Dying Fetus#Members.  Thanks. -- ToET 14:31, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done...does this page really need full protection though?  Skomorokh  18:15, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks to have been done to protect against article recreation, but that was two years ago.  It would likely be safe to unprotect now. -- ToET 00:07, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for retargeting to extant section
Talk:Cotto

message: I've listed "salami cotto" because in delis and sandwich shops (the only places that many people run across the item), it is often identified only as "cotto".  The brick tile meaning is probably more obscure, but the two extant links to cotto are for that meaning (Amelia (Italy) and Santa Maria presso San Satiro). ENeville 23:06, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Duke Wen of Jin

message: To User:星光下的人: you provided the following quote from Zuo Zhuan to support your claim that Duke Wen's clan name is Jin: "晋重、 鲁申、卫武、蔡甲午、郑捷、齐潘、宋王臣、莒期" (trans: Jin Chong, Lu Shen, Wei Wu, Cai Jiawu, Zheng Jie, Qi Pan, Song King Chen, Ju Qi).  But I don't find this convincing at all.  Ancient texts frequently refer to rulers of states with "State name + personal name" (Tang Shuyu, Cai Shudu, for example), which does not mean the name of the state is the person's clan name.  Also look at the "Qi Pan" in the quote, which refers to Duke Zhao of Qi whose personal name is Pan.  It's well known that Qi rulers' clan name is Lü, and Qi here clearly refers to the state name, not the clan name. Analogously, the Jin in Jin Chong refers to the state name, not the clan name. --Zanhe (talk) 17:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Chinese clan name have a law before Qin dynasty called "using the state name for clan name"(以国为氏).张淑一 《周代姓氏制度研究》东北师范大学 1999年硕士论文 P35  “以国为氏的人名例证有：晋文公称晋重、鲁僖公称鲁申……齐昭公称齐潘”。陈絜《商周姓氏制度研究》   P272“在正常情况下，各国诸侯是以国为氏的”.And I can tell you Qi rulers' clan name is Qi ,only Taigong and Dinggong ' clan name is Lü,it may be after 5 generations they changed clan name.集解礼记曰：“太公封於营丘，比及五世，皆反葬於周。”郑玄曰：“太公受封，留为太师，死葬於周。五世之後乃葬齐。”.——星光下的人 (talk) 04:07, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clan name 

message: :...yet another succession crisis in Qi in 639 BC...
This seems wrong. There was a huge civil war over Qi's succession in 643–2 but no trouble at all in 639. Source? — LlywelynII 00:53, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Departure from Qi

message: The current sources about Jie Zhitui also have more info about the Wen Duke in other contexts as well.
These were previously listed but unused. Kindly restore these to the bibliography once they're being used for inline citations:
* .
* .
 — LlywelynII 05:52, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion
Talk:Brazil-nut poison frog

message: There seems to be no discussion of its toxin -- does it come from eating ants, for example?--Jrm2007 (talk) 00:19, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know. The abstract of this article is the only mention of the toxins in this genus that I could find and is not much help. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:13, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toxin 
Talk:Red-headed poison frog

message: Hello, the picture used is a picture of Leptolepis flavomaculatus.
The mistake comes from this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anoures.jpg previously erronated page. The problem should be fixed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.89.25.228 (talk) 16:20, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Picture
Talk:Cherry Hill, Seattle

message: Cherry Hill isn't considered one of the Seven hills of Seattle as listed on that page. In my (limited) experience, it's often considered part of First Hill. --Skvader (talk) 22:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seven hills of Seattle 
Talk:Columbia City, Seattle

message: could use some work on the neighborhood history
could use better photos
could use a fuller description of the neighborhood's cultural assets, businesses and landmarks
perhaps a notable people who live in the neighborhood section? (are there any??)
what else? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.58.73.195 (talk) 01:59, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added  for the claim that crime in Columbia City is “rare, by big city standards.” What are “big city standards”? More importantly, it would appear that this claim is demonstrably false.
Columbia City is near the intersection of three zip codes: 98144, 98108, and 98118. According to , the average of total crime for these three zip codes is 97 percent higher than the national average – that’s almost double. According to , Seattle, a “big city”, has a total crime rate 49 percent higher than the national average. In absolute terms, Columbia City’s crime rate is thus 48 percent higher than big city Seattle’s average.
Even if you only include 98118, in which the very center of Columbia City is located, total crime is 76 percent higher than the national average, and 21 percent higher than big city Seattle.
How is this at all conducive to the claim that crime in Columbia City is “rare, by big city standards”? Please define “big city standards,” and provide data contrasting Columbia City crime with those standards. Otherwise, it would be advisable to revise the entry to reflect the area’s apparent relative high crime, or just drop the claim altogether.--Chipdouglas (talk) 00:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious Claim About Crime in Columbia City 

message: Would be great to add demographic section. What are the relevant census tracts for Columbia City? If I know, we could use that to give a picture of the cultural composition of the neighborhood. --Mujalifah (talk) 00:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographics 