lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Micro Channel architecture

message: Back in the day (circa 1990), the word was that MCA had failed because only (numbers approximate) 50,000 distinct indentification codes were available for available for third party cards, and IBM had reserved half of them for their own use, and promised to disperse the others to anyone who asked for one.  But it was this threatened layer of administration that sank the standard: hardware builders didn;t want to trust IBM.  Am I remembering it wrong?  If anyone says so, I'll shut up about it.  --Crid 03:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Does the section on Micro Channel bandwidth take into account the 'streaming' mode that could be used in later PS/2 and RS/6000 servers? This mode, as I recall, took a start address and an initial 32-bit data segment, and then took over the address bus for additional data to be written in sequence as if the Micro Channel were a 64-bit data bus at 10MHz for block transfers. IBM gave this as an 80MB/sec mode, but it is possible that overhead and other limitations led to the 66MB/sec figure here? --Warphammer 07:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Streaming Mode 

message: This is not a sound card, it's a dedicated MIDI interface incapable of producing sound on its own. 57.135.233.22 (talk) 17:04, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roland MPU-IMC
Talk:HijackThis

message: It works but it gives a lot of false positives. You can add them to ignore if you know what they are though. I recommed using Autoruns.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.243.178.205 (talk) 08:48, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Not for Windows 7 (ver 2.05 beta, latest as of 2011

message: hey, the 2.03 beta is out - http://free.antivirus.com/hijackthis/ - so if someone could add this to the preview release thingy that would be great.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathtreath93 (talk • contribs) 19:56, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2.03 Beta

message: I think that this page should have for information about HJT, how to run and use it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abustiaf (talk • contribs) 21:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I showed the list to Chris and he didn't object. MMJ Wiki 17:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding more info. 

message: Please read Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not.  Particularly the section headed "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information".  AlistairMcMillan 21:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What Wikipedia is not

message: System requirements:
:Operating System:
* Microsoft™ Windows™ Vista
* Microsoft™ Windows™ XP
* Microsoft™ Windows™ 2000
* Microsoft™ Windows™ Me
* Microsoft™ Windows™ 98
Software:
* Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or 7.0
* Mozilla™ Firefox™ 1.5 or 2.0
:Compatible with: Windows 2000 and newer
:Currently at version: 2.x
:-> Download from MajorGeeks
:-> Download from TrendMicro
To download a free Trend Micro™ HijackThis™, please click the button below.
>>>The new owner TrendMicro says Win98-Vista, but the fellow who wrote it says "Windows 2000 and newer".  What are the potential issues with running the latest version with Win98?  Also, there are three different versions of the download - please explain.
-68.236.103.195 (talk) 15:01, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Win 98? 

message: The icon and the webpage mention HiJackThis as the name, but the software title says HijackThis, which one is it?
Perhaps the name was changed but not the actual coding of the name  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbartelsm (talk • contribs) 21:39, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  HiJack or Hijack? 
Talk:Top (software)

message: A concise summary of each display field is available at ...--Billymac00 (talk) 17:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Display Fields 

message: I have just edited the previously named Top:- section. It is really about options to the command. It's still not as high quality as I'd like to see. Can anyone improve on it? -- Unixguy (talk) 18:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Options 

message: Sounds like an interesting app/software, made me want to learn more. Only problem is I’m not and probably never will be a Unix user, so I wanted to know if there were any apps, programs, whatever, equivalent to this but for use with Mac, iOS, Windows, etc. I couldn’t find any such info here so I assume there isn’t, but I’m thinking maybe it would be nice if it were mentioned, even if just to say that there is no version nor equivalent for anything besides Unix. Dbreyna (talk) 18:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anything like this for non-Unix?
Talk:Quest for Glory V: Dragon Fire

message: If anyone finds a new link to the patch please post it. Sierra decided to stop supporting it. Andrew D White 21:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A link to the patch
Talk:Pietro Domenico Paradies

message: "copied from move.com.au etc." - copyright question almost certainly??? better to create a temporary version based on the it.wiki article ... Schissel | Sound the Note! 04:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When I wrote the article, I had no time to reword it, as that short info was written very good. I put that copied from ... because I was hoping that someone else would make proper edit with even more information. I don't speak Italian, so I was also hoping that some Italian would come and write a sentence or two. --RockyMM 18:31, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm an American journalist and e-book author based in Berne, Switzerland, and hope you can inform me of the year Paradies composed his 6th sonata (with the Toccata in A major that I played as a boy nearly 70 years ago). I'd like to make an entry in an e-book I plan to update with a 2nd edition entitled "Team Spirit!: Milestones in Art and Entertainment". It begins in 1700 and focuses on highlights like Paradies' composition, in his case, as you note, influenced by the Scarlottis. Our entries seek to inform our readership (especially young adults) of creative partnerships to date and even beyond. The book is one of an encyclopedic nonfiction trilogy - the other two focused on milestones in "science and technology" and "business, the professions, and public service". I can be reached via "shepard@bluewin.ch". Thanks in advance for your Wikipedia contribution and for any background you can offer me for the second edition of the "Team Spirit!" trilogy. You can google our work at "Lyn Shepard, Team Spirit!" With best regards, Lyn 178.197.239.29 (talk) 10:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dorotheus of Sidon

message: I removed the bit about questionable dating for Dorotheus, although I'm curious who these "scholars" are who have supposedly disputed his dating.  I'm aware that Deborah Houlding published something about this in the early 90's, but I wasn't aware that anyone was actually taking it seriously at this point.  If we are to follow her argument, then we should also consider Dorotheus to be one of the first Muslim astrologers as well, due to the frequent references to Allah.  That is, at least as far as the corrupt English translation, of the Arabic translation, of the Pahlavi translation, of the original Greek work that was written in verse.  I also removed the reference to the Pentateuch as a work on "Horary astrology" for similar reasons.  Of course, I'm open for discussion if someone would like to challenge this.  --Chris Brennan 04:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Your addition is controversial and is in fact a minority view not held by most astrological historians.    Would you kindly provide your sources?  Otherwise, it will need to be changed.  NaySay 17:46, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was me actually.  I didn't realize that I wasn't signed in when I posted it the other night.   Which additions specifically do you feel are controversial or minority views, and which astrological historians are you referring to specifically?  --Chris Brennan 00:21, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Oh... apparently I was signed in when I edited the article.  My questions still stand though.--Chris Brennan 00:23, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, so I reverted it back to the previous version that I had after my attempts to discuss the matter were apparently ignored or overlooked for nearly a month now.  If you have an issue with the sentence then you should talk to me about it NaySay, because I really don't know why that sentence would even be disputed or which authorities would have an issue with it at this point.  Everyone from Cumont to Pingree seems to agree that Alexandria was the probable founding place of the horoscopic/Hellenistic tradition, and I have yet to see anyone present any information otherwise.  --Chris Brennan 23:37, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  addition is controversial
Talk:Prey

message: Should prey really redir to predator? --M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 04:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have an alternative suggestion? See also Talk:Predator#Predator and Prey (or the name of this page). Ewlyahoocom 10:25, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added my support for the move. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 | T | C | @ 23:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I disagree with this decision, Prey could be a great many things, everything from predation to information about a popular video game. I believe the disambiguation page to be the best redirect. TopGunSF 19:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redir is awkward
Talk:Incorporeality

message: I am sorry to say that a band that is not yet famous to some degree, should not be listed in an Encyclopedia.  Please remove this article.  Thanks.  Perhaps when the band does become quite well known, you can put an article here.  Check out the rules for Wikipedia.  A good general rule is that a google search should come up with a very long list of hits.
:I have removed the following text:
::Incorporeal is also a name of an up and coming Heavy Metal band in the Chesterfield, England area.
:Toodles. - RoyBoy 800 04:58, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heavy Metal band 

message: Could someone with a better grasp of Plato write an appropriate caption for the image of Raphael that someone added to this article? --— Twisted86 - Talk - at 05:57, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raphael? 

message: "Thought thinking itself can also be considered to be an incorporeal method"
I'm pretty certain this should be read as "Though thinking itself can also be considered to be an incorporeal method"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.93.200.42 (talk) 22:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thought Thinking? 

message: When the body melts into the universe in taosim to become enlightened isn't this discorporation basically the same as incorporeality? Ranze (talk) 00:46, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Discorporate

message: * I've moved following quoted line here because it has no business being in an encyclopedia article.
I'm leaving it here in-case anyone wants to use this as a ref to add some actual substance to the article regarding the incorporeality of qualities. Scyrme (talk) 19:10, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alcinous 

message: how will God converse with everyone with these different languages we speaking rn?
how will early man* be judged?  did he even know he was SINNING? 197.181.142.118 (talk) 17:26, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  judgement DAY
Talk:Dandy horse

message: I added the part about the Dandy horse in a movie as "trivia", as I think it fits best there. ChristianH158 18:01, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: Could we have some references for the name 'Dandy Horse'? I've never encountered that terminology outside this article. I've heard 'hobby horse' a lot, and Running Machine (from the German), and Draisine (and varients). The wikimedia commons link doesn't work because that article was deleted for being improperly named.
In brief, cite or it isn't true! 86.164.69.239 (talk) 10:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe the article title was chosen because "hobby horse" has a distracting modern metaphorical meaning, while "dandy horse" doesn't. AnonMoos (talk) 17:06, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name: Dandy Horse? 

message: The Britannica link does mention them being called dandy horses by caricaturists, wikimedia has several examples (https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Dandy_horses_in_art), so it was used and it wasn't complimentary. But I'm with you, why does this article use an obscure name, wouldn't it be better to name it running machine or hobby horse? .phoebewalsh (talk) 08:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe the article title was chosen because "hobby horse" has a distracting modern metaphorical meaning, while "dandy horse" doesn't. AnonMoos (talk) 17:06, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: 2022
Talk:Chic Hecht

message: I have added his obituary as a reference. Capitalistroadster 04:40, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference
Talk:EBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C.

message: Thanks for add a conclusion, but I question part of it: "Thus, the Roberts opinion would seem to lean more heavily in favor of granting an injunction, while the Kennedy opinion expresses more skepticism, particularly where the validity of the patent has also been challenged and remains unsettled."
I know that eBay's challenge to the '265 patent came up in oral arguments, but that isn't the focus of Kennedy's opinion.  A better summation might be: "Thus, the Roberts opinion would seem to lean more heavily in favor of granting injunctions in patent cases, while the Kennedy opinion expresses more willingness for district courts to consider the changing nature of patents."--agr 04:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Conclusion?

message: this article has the trans flag as its image preview 186.195.11.10 (talk) 07:52, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trans flag as preview
Talk:Heterotopia

message: I found this article puzzling. It doesn't even explain what Foucault's concept means! I surfed in wanting to find out what he meant by the word, and the only thing I see is references to *other* explanations of the term. In that respect, it's a poor article--it just adds to the confusion of not knowing what it's all about. Please edit this to answer the question of "what Focault meant by heterotopia".--Snowgrouse 08:34, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of information 

message: Foucault's clearest and the critical reference to the difference between a Utopia and Heterotopia is in the preface to 'The Order of Things' on page xviii. An equally clear description and further use of the term is from Jacques Ranciere, the reference I'm thinking of is in The Politics of Aesthetics (esp p40 and 41) where he argues that in relationship to utopian politics that "the fictions of art and politics are therefore heterotopias rather than utopias" and referring to his book 'The Nights of labor' which is a discussion between workers and the engineers olf a utopia. (Deeply relevant when considering the utopian ideals of neo-liberalism.) Beyond this there is alo the work of Gille Deleuze whos preference of Samuel Butler's heterotopian novel 'Erewhon' is well known.. (SDV 64.47.104.249 12:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References towards other uses of Heterotopia
Talk:Jim Lemon

message: I have added ng and refencino the artapcle. Capitalistroadster 04:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting and Reference
Talk:Barrenjoey, New South Wales

message: I rewrote the entire article from scratch and borrowed some of the sources that were given as well as adding a few more that wern't just websites.  Virtual circuit 22:50, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: I've tried finding a better source for the original naming of Barrenjoey by Arthur Phillip on March 2, 1788. I found this record of Phillipin the area on that day, and naming Pitt Water, but not Barrenjoey. 
http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks/e00101.html
I'm confused, this date is quoted widely,  but is not in that source. WotherspoonSmith (talk) 07:30, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  name source
Portal talk:Current events/June 2006

message: I added that sources were needed to back up that 6/6/06 is the Number of the Beast this is a belief not a fact.mrs.amberj 04:58, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Not sure if Dr Aden is sufficiently (worldwide) notable to be included in this list.  If she is, perhaps she should have an article about her if she is. :) JByrd 20:11, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gloria M Aden
Talk:Metamizole

message: India: 'over the counter' on the map versus 'approval withdrawn in 1973' in words.  Lodidol (talk) 09:36, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  discrepancies between legal status on map and in the text  

message: The two different styles of images in the infobox are not consistent with one another. :File:Metamizole2DACS.svg is the sulfonic acid whereas :File:Metamizole ball-and-stick.png is the sodium sulfonate. Most of the external links seem to point to the sulfonic acid, or have the sodium salt but call it "metamizole sodium" (or related terminology). So is "metamizole" itself the sulfonic acid form, and the sodium salt one specific preparation? DMacks (talk) 04:54, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sodium salt vs acid form 

message: use map: Crimea is Ukraine and should be considered as subordinated to the Ukrainian law. 83.253.222.108 (talk) 17:51, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Noticed the same discrepancy about Crimea, still marked as russian territory. Moreover, Crimea isn't shown as russia in the previous map that the current one is based on, so this change has apparently been introduced by the current map author. 77.85.6.55 (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I used the blank copy of the BlankMap-World.svg map, that map has Crimea under Russia, there is a discussion in the blank copy at: , but even if it coded in that way, it still enables to color Crimea differently than Russia and Ukraine, in case the drug has different availability in that region. If it is over-the-counter (OTC) in Ukraine, there would be no dispute, as they would all be light blue, but I need a source/reference of that information. I do think it is OTC, specially in times of war, but I need a reference to back it up. -- Arthurfragoso (talk) 02:27, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map should be changed
Talk:General Roman Calendar

message: I don’t know who you are, however this artcle is not the right place to add celebrations inscribed to particular calendars. There are better places to add them, for example:
* National calendars of the Roman Rite;
* Personal jurisdiction calendars of the Roman Rite;
* Institutional and societal calendars of the Roman Rite.
7otto (talk) 09:13, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  112.210.232.7: Stop adding celebrations inscribed to particular calendars
Talk:Just Say Julie

message: Unless there's a citation for the claim that "Easton was reputedly outraged", that remark should probably be changed to read "Easton later appeared in an episode and literally stole the show from a (temporarily) dazed and confused Julie".  Spoofing herself as an evil mastermind doesn't quite square with claims she was offended.
It might also be clarified that, like the original airings of "Beavis & Butthead", each 30-minute episode of JSJ was actually 12 minutes of story wrapped around five music videos with sarcastic voice-overs from JB.  A format that makes it hard to syndicate or release on DVD without ruining the original flavor.
Isn't there a better way to say that Julie had a 'rivalry' with Downtown Julie Brown than: "At times Brown was 'jealous' of having her show on the same network that featured another person with the "same name", who was the host of Club MTV and whom she would refer to as the "Evil Julie Brown"." Why is "same name" the link that leads to Downtown Julie Brown's entry?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kjbleu (talk • contribs) 23:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Girl Fight Tonight
Talk:Edward J. Orton, Sr.

message: His middle name is not listed in New International Encyclopedia, so he probably did not have a middle name.  The List of President of the American Association for the Advancement of Science calls him "Edward Francis Orton," which is probably an error.  I am creating the page Edward Orton because I have no information on his middle name.  At some point in the future someone must determine his true name.  I am submitting information from the New International Encyclopedia, so make of it what you will.  His son is listed as Edward Orton, Jr, with no middle name.   Superslum 05:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Edward J. Orton, Jr. is an article.  I cannot verify the correctness of his name, either.  Again, New International Encyclopedia does not contain a middle name for either man.  Superslum 12:42, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: He is either Edward Orton, or Edward J. Orton, Sr., or Edward Francis Orton, so the first step is to identify his real name.   Superslum 22:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: well, at minimum, "Sr." needs to identify this Edward Orton from his son, Edward J. Orton, Jr. Stuph 16:04, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Ohio State University  gives his name as Edward Francis Baxter Orton, Sr.. His son was Edward J. Orton -- what that stands for I don't know. older ≠ wiser 14:26, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Template talk:Currently

message: Has anybody noticed that the box does not fit--E-Bod 05:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  What is this template good for because i assume the other one could be used both inside and outside the other templates. --E-Bod 20:24, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Box sizing

message: Given the relatively scant use of this template (27 transclusions at present), and many alternatives, I propose renaming this template to  and creating a new template which implements  instead (with some uppercase/lowercase handling to be added). I can use AWB to fix each of the existing transclusions. TheFeds 00:40, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've implemented what you describe at Template:Currently/sandbox. If it works for you, and you are willing to fix the existing transclusions, you can move it to Template:Currently.--Anders Feder (talk) 05:18, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to use this template's name for another purpose