lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cheaper by the Dozen 2

message: The synopsies seems a little mixed up to me.. can anyone verify this? 12.145.15.147 23:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: plot summaries should be just that: a brief summary of the plot.  they shouldn't be a summary of every scene.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.151.167.253 (talk) 19:08, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  plot summaries 

message: Should this article be semi-protected from IP users? yes.They keep on putting in random stuff that makes little to no sense. (For example, Beth commits suicide, one of the Murtaughs is listed as "she is awesome", etc.) Zappa (talk) 16:52, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection? 

message: I'm really surprised this article has no picture... it's not THAT obscure, and it features Hollywood stars Steve Martin and Taylor Lautner. It definitely needs one. Wimpyguy (talk) 20:42, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a picture 
Talk:Ju-On

message: "A year later Takashi Shimizu directed The Grudge, an American remake. It is noted that it is based on theatrical version of Ju-on, but it contains scenes re-enacted from all of the Ju-on movies"
I think it should be blatently stated that entire characters from the original are replaced with a single cop character, and this character is given scenes that don't exist in the original. -NeF (talk) 10:13, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vague 

message: Dear Wikipedia community,
I think the section about a TBA fourth installment of the American reboot must be just a joke. How is it that it has been planned SEVEN years in advance????!!!!
If it is true, which I doubt, someone must provide a reliable source or that section should be removed. A wikilink leads to The Grudge (film_series). There, the supposed release date is 2012 which is much more plausible. So, I will change the date here to mirror that. Anyways, if someone knows for sure it is incorrect please do the necessary changes.
George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 23:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Grudge 4 (2018) ??? 

message: I propose this be merged with the main Ju-on page. These are obscure short films that are not notable enough to warrant their own article. LF (talk) 08:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: 2004
The Grudge (American version)
This was largely a remake of Ju-on: The Grudge, following the story of Karen Davis (Sarah Michelle Gellar), a social worker assigned to take care of Emma Williams. The movie varies slightly from the original, because Karen burns the house and survives the curse. However, the house is saved.
This is a huge spoiler! I had not seen this one yet, but now the ending has been completely ruined for me. Take it out please! — Preceding unsigned comment added by98.244.77.26 (talk) 17:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  SPOILERS? 

message: I'm surprised there isn't a single reference to the third English movie. I rented it at some point, but the only information I can find on it online is a plot blurb. Can anyone track down more to get a page started?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.19.67.32 (talk) 18:20, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Grudge 3 

message: Any discussion about this should take place on the talk page, not by removal of comments and putting a short comment in the WP:edit summary. This is for dicussion of the article, and nobody WP:OWNs this page.Martin451 14:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion. 

message: The redirect Ju-on -video side- has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 06:15, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Ju-on -video side-]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: On the movie chart, black/white ghost was marked as blue/remake while on the page both was included in original series. Which one is correct? Mr Gabri (talk) 04:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency on Movie Chart
Talk:Microhistory

message: Does this topic include the recent trend of books about single objects, ideas, etc.? They are colloquially referred to as microhistories, but this entry doesn't exactly sound like it includes that style.
Examples:
* Mark Kurlansky, Salt: A World History
* Charles Seife, Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea
* Larry Zuckerman, The Potato : How the Humble Spud Rescued the Western World
* Witold Rybczynski, One Good Turn: A Natural History of the Screwdriver and the Screw
* Robert Friedel, Zipper: An Exploration in Novelty
* Stephen Fenichell, Plastic: The Making of a Synthetic Century 
* Mario Livio, The Golden Ratio : The Story of PHI, the World's Most Astonishing Number
* Arno Karlen, The Biography of a Germ
There are many others. Is there a distinction between academic studies as described in the entry, and these 'popular' books? Are these out of scope? --Metabolome 01:20, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
*I think there is quite a difference; microhistory is the historical counterpart to an ethnology of a small community; it is not a vast history of an everyday topic.  I don't know what these popular books would be called -though if I were to make something up "mundane histories" might fit- but they clearly are by now a real genre, and I bet if you talked to someone in the publishing industry, we could get a real name for them.--Pharos 08:53, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kurlansky, et. al.

message: I've never thought of Geertz as a microhistorian, nor have I seen him referred to as such.  He is certainly a great influence on microhistory, especially the work of Robert Darnton, but one would be hard pressed to call him a historian of any stripe.
On a related note, would it be appropriate to add Robert Darnton to the list?  Most of his work certainly qualifies, I would think.Stuthehistoryguy (talk) 20:03, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Geertz? Darnton?

message: Family History is a research area that distinguishes itself from mere genealogy (i.e. biological lineage and BMD events) by encompassing generalised history of a family (e.g. from newspapers, biographies, military records, judicial records, medical records, etc), and the places they lived in or worked at. From this perspective family history research is another type of microhistory. In fact, it has been suggested that including some aspect of family history research into the school curriculum would get more children interested in history, maybe in microcosm initially but for general history later.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonyproctor (talk • contribs) 12:20, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family History
Talk:Rob Zicari

message: Removed this non sequitur:
: (Production and distribution of obscenity is illegal, while mere possession is not.)
Tell us why it was there, & we'll help you figure out how to say it, if it's encyclopedic.
--Jerzy·t 01:23, 2005 July 13 (UTC)
Well, over at Miller Test it talks about this case, saying that the law was found unconstitutional in the first court in part because a ban on production and distribution of what's legal to possess amounts to a ban on possession.  The Literate Engineer 03:42, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That part at the end about the thumb being cut off... is that some element of a wrestling story line, or some real crime?  It's not clear.  Gigs 00:08, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thumb? 

message: Can we please make a seperate page for Extreme Assocaites. I have lists of the directors and contract girls ready to be posted.JB196 16:18, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: Didn't/Doesn't Rob Black own Elegant Angel also???  What happened there???  Doesn't that deserve at least a mention???User:JCHeverly 16:50, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elegant Angel??? Suggestion
Talk:Homecoming (Green Day song)

message: HI !
I'm a lil disturbed about the article... what the hell makes you so sure that Saint Jimmy is the Alter Ego of Jesus?
Did Billie Joe tell it to you? If yes, congratulations i'll take it that way...
But if it isn't that way ( and I'm very sure it isn't) and you don't answer this article within 2 WEEKS i feel free to edit the article the way i think it's meant to be....
to be sure ... i'll post this one also on the other "AMERICAN IDIOT" single track articles
::Stop making those stupid threats. They get f**k'n annoying. Weirdy 20:59, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Should we feel scared?--Greedy 19:29, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, yeah, Billie Joe said so in the VH1 Storytellers and it's implied throughout the entire album, from Jesus of Suburbia to Boulevard right to the end. 81.110.194.136 20:57, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Threat? 

message: Look here: "Jimmy died today,
He blew his brains out into the bay,
In the state of mind in my own private suicide"
MY OWN PRIVATE SUICIDE, the lyrics said. Weirdy 20:58, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: St. Jimmy is the alter ego of Jesus

message: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CE49vyNjcxE
Not on the album. Anyone with a working pair of ears can hear that's Billie Joe on the album. --Guess Who 09:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mike Dirnt does sing "Nobody Likes You" 

message: I filled out the infobox as best as I could. However, could people who know more about Green Day (and have been participating in this article) provide citations for some of the interpretational material within the article? Also, the tone of discourse on this talk page is fairly harsh; please remember to be civil. Remember, we're all trying to make Wikipedia as good as possible, and people who have contributed are valuable editors in their own right. Captainktainer 09:38, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations and infobox 

message: He does sing "Nobody Likes You" on the album and live. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gNO1H-BVLx4&search=Homecoming%20live
That performance sounds very similar to the one on the album, and if you listen closely on the slbum, you can tell there is a difference in singing between "Nobody Likes You" and the other sections in the song. Listen to that performance and then listen to the song off the album. You will be able to tell Mike Dirnt sings "Nobody Likes You". Orfen 01:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mike Dirnt and "Nobody Likes You"

message: This song continues with the storyline of the album. I believe that St. Jimmy is the part of Jesus of Suburbia/Jimmy that basicly dies, and is forgotten. "Jesus Filling Out Paperwork Now," could be St. Jimmy's papers, as Jimmy himself is still alive. They desribe the last few encounters and experiences of his journey, and he heads back home to Jingle Town. In Whatsername, he discovers what he remembered is gone, and is desolate.Jokanokorf2 (talk) 16:55, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concept of Song
Talk:Hitch (film)

message: If I remember correctly, Julie Ann Emery was the southern girl... And she's a main character... Right? Well, at least a plot devise... A minute one...
Anyway, somebody should add her, and get her a page. She's bound to have some information somewhere. 65.96.98.74 23:11, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I love how you spelt competent wrong... :p riana 08:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julie Ann Emery 

message: Is there any information about influences from the seduction community?
Some of the concepts Alex Hitch uses (the action date, the great seduction style at the bar - to name two prominent examples) seem to me quite PUA'ish.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.126.180.242 (talk) 08:16, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seduction community influenced? 

message: David Coleman claimed to be the inspiration in his presentations. The USA Today article at http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/lifestyle/2005-02-16-date-coaches_x.htm talks a little about this, but there it sounds more like a marketing connection than an inspiration.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brantgurga (talk • contribs) 12:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration
Talk:King Kong (2005 film)

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Kong references in King Kong (2005 film) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 25#Kong references in King Kong (2005 film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 21:11, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kong references in King Kong (2005 film)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Wetasaurus and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 25#Wetasaurus until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 21:16, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wetasaurus" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Lumpy(King Kong) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 29#Lumpy(King Kong) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 18:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lumpy(King Kong)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Ferrucutus cerastes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 09:38, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Ferrucutus cerastes]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Category talk:Cyclists

message: We need to decide whether each individual cyclist is to be categorized under this general Cyclists category as well as under the appropriate nation-based cyclists category (Amercian Cyclists, etc.), or only under the appropriate nation-based cyclists category.  If the latter, then there should be NO individual cyclists listed under the general Cyclists category, and each of the nation-based categories should be a direct subcategory of Cyclists.  --Serge 01:51, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorization of individual cyclists
Talk:Stand by Your Man (EP)

message: ===Motorhead/Plasmatics or Lemmy/Wendy O?===
Is it or isn't it? When Motörhead collaborated with the Plasmatics and one left, leaving two out of three the band is it still Motörhead?--Alf melmac 22:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All Music Guide has it down as "Motorhead/Plasmatics". Bubba hotep 22:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, compare this — to — this — 14,200 vs 692. Bubba hotep 22:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: (moved from [[Motörhead discography]])

message: Is it or isn't it? When Motörhead collaborated with the Plasmatics and one left, leaving two out of three the band is it still Motörhead?--Alf melmac 22:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All Music Guide has it down as "Motorhead/Plasmatics". Bubba hotep 22:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, compare this — to — this — 14,200 vs 692. Bubba hotep 22:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Motorhead/Plasmatics or Lemmy/Wendy O?
Talk:Superman Returns

message: Under [CAST] Section: Please add: "Brandon also had to wear blue-coloured contact lenses, as his natural eye color is brown." Thyon (talk) 09:52, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Victor Schmidt (talk) 12:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 April 2020 

message: It would help if you would cite or point to the source(s) that criticize this as all I'm seeing is criticism of Routh's acting and lack of charisma. DonQuixote (talk) 05:39, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: Characterization of Superman
Talk:James G. Blaine

message: "DISFRANCHISE", is this a real word??? JG Blaine was a School Teacher and Newspaperman.... If disenfranchise is too long then use defranchise...but disfrachised... I really think it is not a word.., and if nobody says anything in the next week I will put in a real wordJohn5Russell3Finley 19:57, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  real words please 

message: I believe the Secretary of State section under President Benjamin Harrison needs to be modified.  According to Calhoun (2005), Benjamin Harrison, pp. 74-77, Blaine was often absent from his position of Secretary of State and President Harrison to on the burdens of Secretary of State.  Harrison would make the State Department Documents and then send them to Blaine for signature.  Blaine stayed in Bar Harbor, Maine for the hot Washington Summers and left Harrison to attend State Department matters. Cmguy777 (talk) 17:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secretary of State under Harrison 

message: Should James G. Blaine Society be added as a See also?  Although it was named after him, it really had nothing at all to do with Blaine, so maybe it doesn't even merit a "See also" mention.  As this article has reached FA status, I figured it best to post this message and let someone with more involvement and interest decide whether or not to include it, instead of simply adding it myself. SJ Morg (talk) 07:06, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Great article!  I think your inclination is correct, though, the organization is named for him precisely because it has nothing to do with him.  I can't think of a way to fit it into the article's narrative, and even a "See also" might be too much.  You might want to add it to the James G. Blaine category, if you want some kind of connection. --Coemgenus (talk) 12:08, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  James G. Blaine Society 

message: I think the lead paragraph of this article should mention that Blaine served as secretary of state. ImperialSaponification (talk) 20:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secretary of State
Talk:Sentimental Journey (Ringo Starr album)

message: The paragraph beginning 'Although it was extremely secret..." has numerous issues related to POV, encyclopedic tone, formatting, punctuation, etc. I made a number of changes but these were mostly to do with formatting...can't address anything factual at the moment but it could also use some citations. There are also a number of weasely phrases that aren't substantiated ("almost certainly", etc.) PurpleChez (talk) 20:10, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone, POV

message: Why does the link for I’m A Fool To Care redirect to this Ringo Staff album?  The song is but one of twelve tunes on the album.   The album is a secondary source - the primary being the actual song written by Ted Daffan.
81.110.17.120 (talk) 18:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: I am a little surprised that neither the Wikipedia article nor the one in Allmusic refers to this being one of the first albums of standards recorded by any pop music artist, maybe the very first.  I certainly cannot think of another one.  Dozens have been released since this one, by everyone from Linda Ronstadt to Rod Stewart  to Willie Nelson to Cyndi Lauper.  This is not the best of them by a long shot, but it sure got the ball rolling.  And by the way, way too much is made of how Ringo can't sing.  I hadn't realized until I read this article that "It Don't Come Easy" was recorded in the same time period; that is one of the best solo singles by any of the Beatles for my money. Shocking Blue (talk) 08:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A First Perhaps?
Talk:Potassium tartrate

message: Added a link to clarify homonym of Argol (small village in finistère département in France).
Mille sabord 22:08, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Cream of tartar isn't the same stuff.  It's potassium hydrogen tartarate, whereas this page is about dipotassium tartarate.67.158.76.126 20:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation link 

message: Potassium acid tartrate has the formula KHC4H4O6. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.150.8.71 (talk • contribs) .
:That would be potassium acid tartrate, not dipotassium tartrate. —Keenan Pepper 03:56, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formula 

message: Please add some usage cases, like the use in pavlova, not just a salt replacement and acid regulator. 
What does it really do to food? 
Thanks -- 11:04, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add usage cases
Talk:List of districts of the House of Representatives of Japan

message: The article as of June 2021 says that Japan has a Mixed-member proportional representation but the MMPR article does not mention Japan; the article on Parallel voting mentions Japan specifically. Are there any arguments against changing this? Vagabond nanoda (talk) 09:47, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed Member or Parallel Voting?
Talk:Puppeteer

message: This entry is highly misleading, as it overemphasizes American puppeteers that can be found in mass-entertainment like TV and Film. The real art of puppetry and puppeteers has a much broader and richer tradition. In the spectrum of puppetry, TV and Film is a very narrow band. Unfortunately the power of mass media diminishes and ignores the phenomenal work of artists who have worked in puppetry for generations all over the globe.
That's a very good point.  Perhaps there are some suggestions for other traditions of puppetry that could be added.
I agree with the observation above, and the ensuring suggestion.  I have therefore humbly attempted to fill in the most rudimentary outline of the grand European and Asian puppet theater traditions.  I humbly leave it to more learned members of the puppet community to expand upon these entries, as they are beyond my personal field of expertise.--Peter puppet 07:23, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for doing that. A lot more should be added to this including dates and more details. Morganfitzp 03:27, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: A couple of users have decided to casually remove names of well-known puppeteers without credible discussion or knowledge of who these puppeteers are. It would be wise to think before casually removing information from wikipedia and depriving others of the right to obtain information. 
Finneganw 15:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of notable puppeteer named without discussion - March 2008 

message: Some of the names on this list (Edgar Bergen, Shari Lewis, Paul Winchell) are actually ventriloquists, not puppeteers. There is a huge difference.
--184.34.36.15 (talk) 04:24, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Puppeteers Vs. Ventriloquists

message: Do we need list all the Puppeteers in this article? This creates a long list and make the article is very unbalanced. They are in Puppeteer category btw. Alphama (talk) 05:27, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Puppeteers 

message: This article is little more than a list of notable puppeteers.  Should it not be muerged with Puppet?  97.67.165.50 (talk) 17:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Puppet??