Talk:Grenadier Guards

message: Tried to add some more information to the Insignia part 
of the box, but it does not show on the page. Does it need
resizing of the box?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suredev (talk • contribs) 19:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, I believe I've fixed the issue with this edit: . The problem was that the identification labels were not sequentially numbered. Incidentally, I think there is a limit to the number of id symbol fields the infobox will take (I think four might be the limit, hence why the abbreviation is now not showing). Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 22:31, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

text: Thanks. I guess the abbreviation does not belong in "Insignia" anyway. But we can same a field by putting the collar and shoulder insignia in the same field. Let me do that for now. Suredev  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 13.13.16.1 (talk) 16:17, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding to Insignia portion 

message: What does "this will be fixed" mean?  Rojomoke 22:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role 

message: Ironically, at Waterloo they fought brillantly and defeated "French Imperial Chasseurs" and not "French Imperial Grenadiers". At least they kept the good bearskin (I mean the one of the Chasseurs which was without a metal plate in front).
The: "Source specifying who the British Guards defeated at Waterloo" in the body of the text, is one of the most biased anti British screeds I have ever clapped eyes on.Scan your eyes over it and you will see nothing but the English and British being scared, beaten and driven off right, left and center. Funny how they won the battle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Treviboy (talk • contribs) 10:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be, but after reading the wiki article and several books on Waterloo, this unit of Guards indeed defeated Imperial Chasseurs and not Imperial Grenadiers. "you will see nothing but the English and British being scared, beaten and driven off right, left and center. Funny how they won the battle." Well that's a change considering the British litterature production on Waterloo ; during years, it was the Allies - especially Dutch and Belgian - of Britain who were labelled as cowards, paper tigers, bastards or mad dogs. This is just a question of perspective and time to time of national bias. Does that change the view of this unit's famous history, I don't think so. 90.42.251.97 (talk) 01:29, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the regiment 

message: Can someone write some brief remark about the uniforms they wear, especially the headgear? Thanks. 4.227.234.202 (talk) 05:51, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headgear 

message: I have removed the following from the article as it seems more like commentary that should be on the talk page rather than in the articlespace. I am placing it here if anyone wants to discuss. I do not have any opinion about its accuracy, however, I am currently trying to help out by rewriting the history section was quite light on, hence I am putting it here for safekeeping. AustralianRupert (talk) 02:40, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed content

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Grenadier Guards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160221172356/http://www.theguardsmuseum.com/ to http://www.theguardsmuseum.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120224154346/http://british-army-units1945on.co.uk/default.aspx to http://british-army-units1945on.co.uk/default.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Grenadier Guards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120925005657/http://www.army.mod.uk/documents/general/History_Grenadier_Guards.pdf to http://www.army.mod.uk/documents/general/History_Grenadier_Guards.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100722003449/http://www.army.mod.uk/infantry/regiments/3485.aspx to http://www.army.mod.uk/infantry/regiments/3485.aspx
*Added archive http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20141103191220/http%3A//www.nam.ac.uk/research/famous%2Dunits/grenadier%2Dguards to http://www.nam.ac.uk/research/famous-units/grenadier-guards
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Thought I would put this in talk page:
* Regimental Headquarters
** Band of the Grenadier Guards - Medical Support in event of big war
** No.25 Company ???? - Gained Information from person inside band..  Possible other support unit?
* 1st Battalion
**Headquarters Company
***Regimental Administration Office
***Quartermaster's Office
***REME Light Aid Detachment
***Assault Pioneer Platoon - Provided by Corps of Drums
***Medical Section
***Provost Unit
***Unit Pay Group
**No.1 (Queen's) Company
***Company Headquarters
***1 Platoon
***2 Platoon
***3 Platoon
***Support Platoon
**No.2 Company
***Company Headquarters
***4 Platoon
***5 Platoon
***6 Platoon
***Support Platoon
**No.3 (Inkerman) Company
***Company Headquarters
***7 Platoon
***8 Platoon
***9 Platoon
***Support Platoon
**Support Company
***Company Headquarters
***Sniper Platoon Platoon
***Reconnaissance Platoon
***Mortars Platoon
***Machine-Gun Platoon
* No.2 (Nijmegan) Company
**Company and Support Platoon
***Support Section
***Quartermaster's Section
***Tailor's Group
**1 Platoon
**2 Platoon
**3 Platoon
: Totally spamming. BlueD954 (talk) 13:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure

message: Two people are listed as 'Colonel of the Regiment'  -  The Duke of York and Lieutenant Colonel Piers Ashfield. Can you separate-out their roles? Valetude (talk) 13:24, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Dormskirk (talk) 15:10, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two colonels? 

message: The intro says 1662 and the main text says 1656, which agrees with the entry on Lord Wentworth's Regiment and the one on the British Army order of precedence.
Manolan1 (talk) 12:25, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed it to 1656 for consistency. Most sources seem to support that date. Dormskirk (talk) 12:31, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of formation 

message: The sentence referring to the Malplaquet replacement must be wrong; in 1709 Queen Anne was monarch - George II didn't take the throne until 1728.  If it was George II, it was a different date and battle. 88.111.184.40 (talk) 13:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regimental structure - King's Company