Talk:Slovak National Party

message: Testing... Please, write your objections, if you have any! Laddy
Thank you for editing... I was thinking, that I should have named the headline more neutrally. :) Laddy
Please, do not change the name of the sub-article "SNS in the common state of Czechs and Slovaks" to "SNS in Czechoslovakia". Czechoslovak Republic was renamed in 1938 and became the Czecho-Slovak Republic. My headline makes the situation easier, so please, let it be! Thanks! Laddy
Laddy = Liberal Nationalist
I hope Juro won´t change ĺudáci to Slovak People´s Party. At that time they weren´t organized as a party. Liberal Nationalist 13:22, Mar 16, 2005 (UTC)
This is a linguistic problem - you cannot translate ludaci with "populars" - that's impossible. The only possible translation is Populists, but for obvious reasons populists is not suitable as well. Try to find another solution, like "the (future) People's Party" or something like that. Juro 03:08, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Testing

message: explain, where the latest edits have disappeared? Not only from the article, but from the history. --91.127.63.46 14:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone, please, 

message: This page has been the target of ongoing edit wars, and I am disappointed to see that there has been absolutely zero attempt to engage at the talkpage.  I have protected the article for 24 hours.  When the protection is lifted, this does not mean that edit-warring can continue.  Anyone else who continues to revert without discussion, is at risk of being placed on editing restrictions, and/or having their account access blocked.
For further information, or to raise any other issues about the disputes or the behavior of the editors involved in them, please see User talk:Elonka/Hungarian-Slovakian experiment. --Elonka 22:39, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputes

message: I think we have discussed the matter enough at Elonka's experiment page (see archive of discussion). I insist on the opinion that use of map of divided Hungary is not proportionate to the importance of controversy, it is just one of many surrounding Slovak National Party. We have agreed on the approach and specific sentence in discussion that was freely available to anyone not blocked within 3 days of its run and even later. Therefore I am removing the map from the article. Are there any new arguments? --Ruziklan (talk) 19:05, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove map 

message: ...there is a big white space. Are both infoboxes needed? – Alensha talk 21:34, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page looks odd on Explorer... 

message: While it is certainly interesting and entertaining to see those two logos compared, placement of those images misleads the reader. The similarity has its own context, which should be explained. One way or the other, the images should be moved further down the page as it is more of a quirk than an actual encyclopaedic information. Wladthemlat (talk) 20:59, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Logo comparsion was moved further down as asked. Hobartimus (talk) 03:05, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The current SNS logo is copy of historical SNS logo established in 1871. And now - when was NSDAP party established? Wasn´t it in 1919 by any chance? And now, please, care to exaplain what connection do you see between logo of party which was used since 1871 and logo of party established 48 years laters? I could also start ask about that neo-facscistic orientation, but I guess it would just bring another edit war. --EllsworthSK (talk) 17:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The swastika is even older well predating 1871. Yet if you use the swastika or nazi party logo today there is a different meaning to them then their original. If you have a source to your info (1871) it would be nice as well. Hobartimus (talk) 02:12, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Swastica is old budhistic symbol, I personally have at home statue of Budha with swastika in his hearth which I brought from Thailand but that doesn´t make me nazi, does it? Either way, SNS logo does not have swastika in it´s logo or anything so I don´t know where are you heading with this. And the source is for example Dejiny Slovenska by Slovak Academy of Science published in 1961. --EllsworthSK (talk) 15:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, to be fair, if the logo is only a copy of the logo of the historical party, the comparison with NSDAP is way out of line. Historical SNS predates NSDAP, the heraldic was probably very common at the time, it is definitely not an allusion to the Nazi logo.The logo comparison should remain deleted as it is just a blatant and primitive POV push. Wladthemlat (talk) 08:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo comparison

message: I don't see the connection between SNS and Slovenska pospolitost, can somebody explain? I think it's not notable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jg333 (talk • contribs) 11:10, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Might you have asked me? The Anti-Hungarian sentiment is that what I could tell you if I am a proper "somebody" to answer your question.--Nmate (talk) 17:45, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Anti-hungarian sentiment is dominant in the case of SNS, however Pospolitost is more anti-Roma or generally xenophobic. I agree with Jg333, there is no direct connection between the two. Wladthemlat (talk) 15:42, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "See also: Slovenska pospolitost" 

message: Can we remove the part in the lead that purports that racism = rightwing? The party appears to be socialist (left wing) and arguably racist. So why do we suddenly decide they are right wing. There are tons of left and right wing racists. I would do it myself, but I feel there needs to be a little discussion first. Metallurgist (talk) 04:28, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The party is not right wing it's far right. Where did you get that it was socialist/racist? Maybe you confused it with SMER,(another party from Slovakia and SNS coalition partner) who really do claim to be socialist? For example the SNS was never a member of socialist associations or the PES (party of European Socialists) even though it sits in the Eur. Parliament for at least 6 years. Hobartimus (talk) 20:34, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Their program actually contains more leftist than rightist points, but it would indeed need some citations before inclusion. Wladthemlat (talk) 22:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: We cannot call a party right wing just because it might be racist. Racists can be left or right wing. I know many left wing racists personally. The party calls itself socialist. That is supported by its stated policies. There is no basis for calling it far right. I note that the party's former coalition partner, Direction – Social Democracy, is described in Wikipedia as left wing nationalist.Royalcourtier (talk) 23:27, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racism ≠ Right wing 

message: The party calls itself socialist and nationalist. For Wikipedia to categorise it as far right is contrary to the party's own self-proclaimed political position, and would be hard to justify.  Even the article says that [only] "some" have called it far right. I would suggest that calling it "socialist" and "nationalist" would be more logical and consistent with the known facts.Royalcourtier (talk) 23:21, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorisation as far right NPOV 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Slovak National Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080205042631/http://www.isn.ethz.ch:80/news/sw/details.cfm?ID=16759 to http://www.isn.ethz.ch/news/sw/details.cfm?ID=16759
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:38, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Slovak National Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140221090708/http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iIDrrh5-IWEjI8sgnlcbm45xs-iwD9G9VHEG1 to http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iIDrrh5-IWEjI8sgnlcbm45xs-iwD9G9VHEG1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070220215438/http://cepa.ncpa.org:80/digest/concern-over-new-slovak-government to http://cepa.ncpa.org/digest/concern-over-new-slovak-government
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091019082930/http://www.figyelo.ro:80/kulfold/letoroltek-europa-terkeperol-magyarorszagot-slotaek.html to http://www.figyelo.ro/kulfold/letoroltek-europa-terkeperol-magyarorszagot-slotaek.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:39, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Slovak National Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120911174947/http://www.sns.sk/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=177 to http://www.sns.sk/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=177
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120707102927/http://businessneweurope.eu/story1652/By_hook_or_crook_Slovakian_EU_funds_find_their_way_to_govt_supporters to http://businessneweurope.eu/story1652/By_hook_or_crook_Slovakian_EU_funds_find_their_way_to_govt_supporters
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110104192424/http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=47387 to http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=47387
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110105110629/http://www.hhrf.org/hhrf/index_en.php?oldal=182 to http://www.hhrf.org/hhrf/index_en.php?oldal=182
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130531035616/http://www.tau.ac.il/Anti-Semitism/asw99-2000/slovakia.htm to http://www.tau.ac.il/Anti-Semitism/asw99-2000/slovakia.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110105110629/http://www.hhrf.org/hhrf/index_en.php?oldal=182 to http://www.hhrf.org/hhrf/index_en.php?oldal=182
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130531035616/http://www.tau.ac.il/Anti-Semitism/asw99-2000/slovakia.htm to http://www.tau.ac.il/Anti-Semitism/asw99-2000/slovakia.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110929022925/http://www.hirado.hu/Hirek/2011/08/11/13/Nem_kell_Duraynak_fizetni_amiert_lefasisztazta_Slotaek_partjat.aspx to http://www.hirado.hu/Hirek/2011/08/11/13/Nem_kell_Duraynak_fizetni_amiert_lefasisztazta_Slotaek_partjat.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Slovak National Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20061014155725/http://www.pes.org/content/view/721/90 to http://www.pes.org/content/view/721/90
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified