Talk:Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry

message: I noticed this page has a lot of plagiarized text. Can we work together to fix this, or does someone with expertise want to take up the task of rewriting?
saintvip (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Request

message: Can anyone please give a brief explanation of how a sample is measured? The plasma-to-ms in the intro is too brief, and the full explanation too lengthy.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.38.9.39 (talk) 09:20, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A sample is prepared in liquid form. A flow of gas, applied to the sample, converts the sample to an aerosol form. A plasma torch is then applied to the aerosol which ionizes the atoms. Mass spectrometry is then performed on the ionized atoms. Thintommy 14:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Request

message: The DRC page has been tagged as needing a clean-up for some time. Anybody over here want to give it a shot?--SteveMtl 15:43, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Dynamic Reaction Cell]] 

message: Dynamic Reaction Cell is a related short article with cleanup needs. A merge could help set that information with the context of this article. Comments? --Kkmurray 02:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged, but article still needs refs and cleanup.--Kkmurray 17:44, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge dynamic reaction cell with ICP-MS 

message: See WP:NAME and WP:ACRONYM. The main issue is whether ICP-MS is "almost exclusively known only by its acronym"  (emphasis added). I am arguing that it is known by both so the acronym should be spelled out. This will essentially be a swap of redirect and content between the existing ICP-MS and  Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. --Kkmurray 04:13, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename (de-Acronym)

message: Request is here:  WP:RM  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkmurray (talk • contribs) 04:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Additional rationale:  ICP disambiguates to article Inductively coupled plasma, ICP-AES redirects to Inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy. In this scheme, ICP-MS should redirect (remembering to sign this time). --Kkmurray 13:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+%22ICP-AES%22&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.64.223.221 (talk) 12:25, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info about the tech of [[ICP-AES]].... 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+ICP-AES+accuracy&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.64.223.221 (talk) 12:29, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy and precision 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=selectivity&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=ICP+AES&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
--222.64.223.221 (talk) 12:34, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selectivity/specificity 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+limit+detection+ICP-AES&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.64.223.221 (talk) 12:39, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limit of detection 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+linearity+ICP-AES&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.64.223.221 (talk) 12:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linearity 

message: From Google scholar
* http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+ICP-AES&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=1978&as_yhi=1978&as_vis=0
* http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+ICP-AES&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=1970&as_yhi=1977&as_vis=0
I'm surprised that the tech has got a such long history and not many monographs about its linearity which usually should be assessed even at the preliminary stage
--222.67.209.251 (talk) 13:49, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The history 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+ICP-AES+validity&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.64.19.136 (talk) 14:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Validity 

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&safe=active&q=allintitle%3A%20Inductively%20coupled%20plasma%20atomic%20emission%20spectrometry&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=ws
* http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+Inductively+coupled+plasma+atomic+emission+spectroscopy&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.64.19.136 (talk) 14:23, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature problem...???

message: * http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?as_q=define+spectrometry&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
* http://scholar.google.com.hk/scholar?hl=en&q=allintitle%3A+define+spectroscopy&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2000&as_ylo=&as_vis=0
--222.64.19.136 (talk) 14:33, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the definition of.....

message: * http://www.google.com.hk/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=define%3Aspectroscopy&btnG=Google+Search&aq=o&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=
* http://www.google.com.hk/search?hl=en&safe=active&q=define%3Aspectrometry&btnG=Search&meta=
--222.64.19.136 (talk) 14:46, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public opinion 

message: related.....?????
* Karmapa Controversy
--222.64.213.93 (talk) 00:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science & religion .....

message: What information exactly or information along what lines is supposed to go there? Is it about "quadrupole" vs. "high-resolution"? Is it about interferences issues? "Cold"/"hot" plasma modes? I don't quite get the idea of the planned section. 213.171.63.227 (talk) 11:16, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Nomenclature'? 

message: In the "Usage" section, in the paragraph beginning "ICP is used for motor oil analysis...", the term "ICP" was used throughout, without the "-MS".  In my (considerable) experience, the ICP technique predominantly used in motor oil analysis is ICP-AES.  Whilst ICP-MS is used, it is nowhere near as common and typically used in specialised analysis rather than routine engine oil sample testing.  To qualify my experience, I have 18 years of product development and technical support with engine oils, including running a lubricating oil analytical laboratory.  My final year project for my undergraduate degree was also in the subject of ICP-MS, specifically isolating and correcting for noise in the MS signal to improve detection limits and ion differentiation.
I have therefore moved the whole section to the ICP-AES article, with slight enhancements. Weasley one (talk) 09:37, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motor oil analysis 

message: In the opening paragraph, is "low-background isotope" synonymous with "minimally radioactive isotope"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thintommy (talk • contribs) 03:36, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130203132009/http://www.spectroscopymag.com/spectroscopy/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=440521&pageID=1&sk=&date= to http://www.spectroscopymag.com/spectroscopy/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=440521&pageID=1&sk=&date=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150319065525/http://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp_pdf/EN/USPNF/key-issues/c232_final.pdf to http://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp_pdf/EN/USPNF/key-issues/c232_final.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140702222638/http://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp_pdf/EN/USPNF/key-issues/c233_final.pdf to http://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp_pdf/EN/USPNF/key-issues/c233_final.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: IP address 82.119.177.151 belongs to analytik-jena.de.  Any edits by this IP should be flagged as having a conflict of interest.  In particular, I have tagged as "not in citation" the statement that "Analytik Jena ICP-MS PQMS is the most sensitive instrument on the market."  Note that this statement is older than the edits by the Analytic Jena; it appears to have been added by the company's predecessor, Bruker.  While the author may be knowledgable, they are too close to the topic at hand.  136.62.254.174 (talk) 02:45, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  warning about edits by Analytic Jena 

message: I don't want to directly remove a cited paragraph, but i don't think that the sentence fits in the introduction of a characterization technique, any opinion on if it should be moved (where?) or removed?
Due to possible applications in nuclear technologies, ICP-MS hardware is a subject for special exporting regulations in the People's Republic of China.
--Bsckr (talk) 14:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I would just delete it as insignificant, even though it's sourced. If we had a section on applications in nuclear technologies then maybe it could go there, but even then I would say it's marginal to include. –CWenger (^ • @) 14:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree.--Bsckr (talk) 04:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exporting regulations from a determined country in the introduction?