lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Stamos

message: The Full House section describes him as the protagonist of the series. He was certainly one of the stars of the show, but "protagonist" usually implies a single main character. It's been a while since I watched the program, but my recollection is that there was more of an ensemble cast (although Jesse certainly may have been the focus of specific episodes).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kime1R (talk • contribs) 14:51, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Responding a decade later: It now says . While personally I wouldn't use the term there, it's not wrong, so I'd say the change from "the" to "one of the" adequately addresses your concern.  -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 09:35, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protagonist? 

message: John Stamos has 3.7 million followers on his Instagram account Avinashfalke (talk) 18:40, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. In addition, I do not think the number of Instagram followers is relevant. Heart (talk) 01:30, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 July 2023 

message: Stood by him while he was shooting a film in Freehold NJ. If he’s 6’, I’m 6’5” 69.117.68.161 (talk) 04:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  His height.  

message: Re: personal life, paragraph 2
Stamos instead of Stavros 172.56.168.117 (talk) 20:43, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: BelowTheSun  (T•C) 21:08, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 October 2023
Talk:Social Credit Party

message: Okay...
1) WAC Bennett and Bill Aberhart were not partners.
2) WAC Bennett ditched the ideology as soon as he became leader of the BC party.
3) Bill Aberhart did adhere to the therory.
4) BC's other Socred premiers also did not follow the ideology.
5) WAC Bennett's joining the party was a political move and was not ideologically movtivated.
I started an article on the British Columbian party.
Vancouverguy 18:45, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: BC SoCred
Talk:Gunsmoke

message: I just added in some information about Arness playing the same character in a Primetime scripted TV show for a long period of time.
The Brits have two actors who have played the same characters for 27 years and 30 years....and the last one is till acting in the show. In terms of primetime scripted TV, there are also a number of TV shows that have eclipsed Gunsmoke's 20 year record now, including Dr who which has been running for 43 years and The Bill, Taggart and Casualty which have been running for more than 23 years.
:Sign your posts, please.  Just to be accurate, Doctor Who has not been running continuously for 43 years, or even for 43 years total.  The sixteen year gap between the cancellation of the original series and the debut of the new one makes a huge difference.  That said, I don't understand where someone got the idea that it has been running 36 years as stated in the article. 1963 to 1989 is 26 years (25 if you want to exclude the 1986-7 hiatus), plus three for the 2005-2007 series (as of this date).  That makes 29 if you're being generous, not 36 or 43.  The presence of DW on TV longevity lists is due to it being the longest-running sci-fi genre show, not the longest running show period, so let's not inflate the numbers please.  If the only qualification is that it be a scripted drama (nowhere in the Longevity section does it say prime time scripted drama), where is the mention of the long-running daytime dramas, some of which have run continuously for over 30 years? 12.22.250.4 18:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longevity 

message: In the article it states "The question as to whether Chester Goode's stiff right leg was wooden or just maimed, was never fully answered. Doc and he never discussed the issue"
In fact they did discuss chesters leg once, in the episode titled "The Round Up" Doc say's that Chester has TWO sprained ankles.  So i guess that answers the question if it is wooden or not. 174.125.90.211 (talk) 09:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chesters Bad Leg was NOT wooden 

message: Wyatt Earp was the first network adult western. The first adult western on TV was Death Valley Days which debuted in syndication in 1952.  96.237.184.133 (talk) 04:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adult Western
Talk:List of Albanian films

message: I am not sure of all these films' origin, I suspect that there may be a couple that are foreign titles translated to Albanian. But I figured it'd be easy to remove them later. --Dori 21:04, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Films' origin

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Ne rjedhen e jetes and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 5#Ne rjedhen e jetes until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 21:41, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ne rjedhen e jetes" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Harry Frazee

message: This article is biased and inaccurate, and apologia for one of the worst baseball owners in history. Who wrote this article -- one of Frazee's great-great-grand- children? How can you call players that Frazee, a New Yorker and a friend of the two Colonels who owned the Yankees, sold to New York "stiffs" when we're talking of players the caliber of Carl Mays to the Yankee. Mays won 26 and 27 games for the Yankees in his first two years ('20 and '21). Herb Pennock, who was sent to the Yankees by Frazee after the 1922 season, is in the Hall of Fame, winning 16 or more games five straight years after the trade. I guess catcher Wally Schange was a stiff too, eh? Waite Hoyt, who was shipped to New York, IS IN THE HALL OF FAME, as is PENNOCK. -- Jonny Zhivago  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonny Zhivago (talk • contribs) 21:28, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article's Point-of-View is Unbalanced; Biased P.O.V. Causes Inaccuracies 

message: What does 'jumped the team' mean? It is written at least two times?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.23.6.247 (talk) 21:33, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does 'jumped the team' mean? It is written at least two times? 

message: Something about Elsie Clisbee (married 1902, divorce 1923) and Margaret C.Boyd? 
Elsie L Clisbee born 24 June 1885 in Carthage, Jaspoer, Missouri
Died 19 March 1969, Del Mar, San Diego, California
Married Frazee on 5 April 1902, Know, Illinois.
Only son: Harry Frazee jr born 20 August 1902, died 28 August 1973  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.247.180.224 (talk) 20:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wives
Talk:Longbowman

message: as i stated in the comments, plz fix or improve this article :-\ 
ugen64 22:34, Aug 31, 2003 (UTC)
:What's stopping you from doing it? RickK 22:36, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't have enough knowledge on the subject :-\... ugen64 01:51, Oct 7, 2003 (UTC)
Wouldn't it be better to add this stuff to Longbow? Rather than have an article for the object, and an article for the people who use them, I mean. Adam Bishop 22:36, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)

text: yes, I think a merge to Longbow would be a good idea - cover the thing and how it was used on one place. -- Tarquin 23:51, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Adam Bishop 00:00, 1 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Index of ethics articles

message: Why is golf on the list?
:It seems to have been removed already.  A joke (but techincally vandalism), unless referrign to concepts of good sportsmanship. RJFJR 16:04, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Golf

message: This list seems to have no order or clear rationale.  Is there, at present, some use for this?  Or may I rewrite this article in a way that is more organized and sensible? KSchutte 22:26, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I think you should. KSchutte 22:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I think this page would be perfect if it was moved out of article namespace. Morgan Wick 01:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: The article includes:
*yi - core issue from Confucianism
But the link to yi is to a disambig apge that says nothign I can see about this 'core issue' in Confucianism. RJFJR 14:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[yi]] 

message: I'm not sure it is necessary to pepper the lit with sometimes considered a core issue comments. RJFJR 16:02, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your concerns; I'm removing these notes. — xDanielx T/C 19:58, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Core issues 

message: I understand and recognize that some specific works -- A Theory of Justice for example -- are the subject of substantial ethical debate. However, I really don't think it's plausible to maintain a list of these work, even if we restrict inclusion to very significant works -- there are just too many, and the criteria are so fuzzy it may seem arbitrary. I also think it would be much more useful to readers if we just list the ethical issues that the works deal with and not the works themselves -- I think it's unlikely that a reader wanting to browse major ethical issues would be interested in specific works. — xDanielx T/C 19:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing specific works 

message: Well, I'm in the middle of a major cleanup, mostly removing links. To others, please keep in mind that longer lists are not necessarily more useful. I agree that value system, for example, can be linked to certain ethical debates, but we don't need it when we have a link to value theory. I think it's much better for viewers if we just provide the most pertinent pages and let them browse similar forks themselves if they happen to be interested. I urge other editors to avoid these redundancies. I've also been removing a lot of links that I think just aren't very relevant to ethics, or are relevant but are not contentious and not topics of significant debate. And I'm removing highly generic topics such as fairness, which are far too broad IMO. — xDanielx T/C 20:03, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I'm moving the inclusion guidelines from the main article to the top of the talk page, to cut down on clutter. Feel absolutely free to edit these guidelines (within reason). — xDanielx T/C 21:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion guidelines
Talk:Physics and Beyond

message: The book is actually called Der Teil und das Ganze, translating to The Part and The Whole. I'm new to Wikis, so I won't change it yet as I don't know whether I'll break cross-references. I'll get back on this. 217.81.53.207
----
Google hits:
A Part and The Whole = 177
The Part and The Whole = 941
I shall move it. Any objections? Angela 23:09, 31 Aug 2003 (UTC)

message: I'm very interested in the book but can't find it anywhere in English.  Is it possible it was never translated?  Hard to believe but I suppose it's possible. Seems like it would be a worthwhile project.
Seems like it has been published in English under the title "Physics and Beyond".
MikeEnnen (talk) 21:33, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book? 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:36, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Zhonghua minzu

message: It is said that minzu has been used since the 6th century, but whether it was used popularly is another matter. minzu was apparently used as a translation of the German word "Volk" during the Japanese Meiji period, and Sun Yat-sen and Liang Qichao were used in a similar vein. Most of all, Volk means "ethnic", "race", "people", "nation", and so on, just like minzu. ProKMT (talk) 07:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is your WP:OR I'm afraid. Brusquedandelion (talk) 10:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volk 

message: From Chinese Wikipedia that minzu means "ethnic group" or "race", as well as from articles in English Wikipedia regarding nationalism in other countries. And there's definitely 'Zhonghua minzu' (中华民族) in March of the Volunteers, the official national anthem of the People's Republic of China. 
It is not a problem to write down in an article that, depending on the context, 'Zhonghua minzu' may mean "Chinese ethnicity" or "Chinese race." (See :zh:中华民族, :zh:民族, Korean ethnic nationalism, Yamato people, An Investigation of Global Policy with the Yamato Race as Nucleus)
There is no reason to cancel editing that is not directly related to Volk. ProKMT (talk) 12:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits other than Volk 

message: it might be interesting to discuss the evolution of national identity, including how "Manchu" itself included specify group of Han, so their "Zhonghua Minzu" maybe a rehash of their own evolution of the Manchu identity... as Russian and Korean population grew along the frontier, the need for population to maintain control of their frontier region and stop foreign settlement probably influence their shift in view. 2406:3003:2006:C2A4:8CAD:B952:92CE:C327 (talk) 13:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qing/Manchu view of the subject changes over time...
Talk:Fuzzy string searching

message: We could use an article on this, instead of the plug for Agrep. Vicki Rosenzweig 02:36, 1 Sep 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the term Approximate string matching is more often used in the literature. Since we already have an article for that, perhaps we should merge these two articles? Offliner (talk) 10:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

message: Since there have been no objections to my mergel proposal, I have now completed moving all such material from this page to Approximate string matching that wasn't there already, and created a redirect. Offliner (talk) 07:30, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:State religion

message: Gambia should be added to formerly confessional countries. 213.80.108.230 (talk) 00:50, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gambia 

message: The People's Republic of China is officially an atheist state. However, the government recognizes five religions: 
* Buddhism
* Taoism
* Christianity (Catholicism and Protestantism are recognized separately)
* Islam
Rajendraumale673 (talk) 09:36, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  china state religion
Talk:Liu Zhi (ROC)

message: Anyone knows the source of the passage, thanx ? kt2 03:43, 1 Sep 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: http://www.nwc.navy.mil/chinesecs/players/kuomintang/liuchih.htm (It's from the US Navy so it's public domain, I presume.) --Jiang 03:49, 1 Sep 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Legends surrounding the papacy

message: What's the point of this page? We already have articles on Vicarius Filii Dei and Pope Joan. This just repeats information from those pages. - Efghij 04:30, 1 Sep 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that I've heard. You're probably thinking of one of the nuttier Roman Emperors (I think it was Caligula) who appointed his horse to the Senate. --Gene_poole 22:40, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What?????  No mention of the check for the Last Supper????--Midnite Critic 05:44, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Documents of Jesus Christ" 

message: Why is the neutrality of this article disputed?  The tone seems OK to me.
BLHersey 23:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality dispute 

message: There is no such dispute. The Latin spelling is the only spelling used for Latin numerology of Latin phrases. "Uicarius Filii Dei" can come only to 666 however the 1st & 7th letters are written. The Latin numerology of English words & phrases can be subject to dispute -. J can be counted as 1 or ignored, K can be counted as 100 or ignored, W can be counted as 5 or 10 .- but not the Latin numerology of Latin words & phrases. Unless I receive an argument to the contrary, I'm going to delete the "dispute" paragraph.
Froggo Zijgeb 00:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "There is also a dispute on the numerology of Vicarius Filii Dei and Vicarius Christi" 

message: Perhaps there's a place here for the myth that the Vatican has the world's largest collection of pornography.  This is debunked by Snopes: http://www.snopes.com/risque/porn/vatican.asp --Maltelauridsbrigge (talk) 14:15, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vatican Library myth 

message: There are also a number of rumours about checks carried out to ensure the pope is male; this is mentioned in the article in the section about Joan (without it being clear whether such tests were really carried out or part of the myth; no reference is given).  Generally it is claimed this is done either by the pope sitting on a chair with a hole (see discussion of sedes stercoraria under Pope Joan), or by someone specially tasked to stick his hand up the papal vestments.  I'm not sure as to whether any of these stories reflect current or historical practice, or are just salacious gossip.  But a discussion here with evidence/refutation would be a useful contribution. --Maltelauridsbrigge (talk) 14:27, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexing the pope 

message: As mentioned by the introduction, "The papacy has been surrounded by numerous legends. Among the most famous are the claims that the Papal Tiara contains the number of the beast inscriptions on the Tiara, that a woman was once elected pope, or that current pope, Benedict XVI, will be the penultimate Pope. The first two claims have been independently determined to be false." Where is the reference? I would very much like to see a reputable refusal of these accusations that can be independently verified  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.173.9.116 (talk) 14:14, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction
Talk:ThinkPad

message: I noticed that the P52, T490 and P15 were listed under "ThinkPad models used on Shuttle missions include:" without citations.
The last Space Shuttle flight was in 2011, while these three models were released later: the P52 in 2015, the T490 in 2019 and the P15 in 2021.
Therefore, I am asking to review these entries. Thank you!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.4.160.132 (talk) 14:19, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  P52, T490 and P15 seem too new for having been used on Shuttle missions. 

message: Is a mess. So many questions. 68.117.48.13 (talk) 15:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: 29 classes? Each listed twice? 68.117.48.13 (talk) 18:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laptop weight scale 

message: This already seems to include all the relevant information, and I don't see a need to break this up into a separate article. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:10, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Lenovo ThinkPad Stack]] into [[ThinkPad#ThinkPad Stack (2015–current)]]
Talk:Lobby

message: I remember hearing that the first use of "lobbyist" was a U.S. president, and I did find a date of 1837 in an online dictionary.  It seems impossible to find any other info online to confirm or refute this however.  (Google gives me a bunch of irrelevant crap, no matter how I phrase the search.)  Can anyone else find anything on this, including which president, and whether he was really the originator, or perhaps just the first in the U.S.? --radiojon 05:58, 1 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Dependent personality disorder

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20060427020146/http://www.toad.net/~arcturus/dd/depend.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Chinese Civil War

message: the name for Mainland China's Communist Party has been agreed to (by the CCP article itself) be referred to as "CCP". as I have a new account (have been using IP in the past), I cannot edit yet. Someone please review my comment. thank you. Joséthewikier (talk) 07:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter. Both are used, and both are acceptable, as long as use is consistent within a given article. Remsense诉 07:26, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: the problem is that it isn't consistent for this article, and it makes most sense to change all the "CPC"s to "CCP". most of the sources (other than the most primary source straight from the Party's mouth) refer to the party as "CCP" rather than "CPC" and I think if we were to aim for consistency, we should change all to "CCP". I don't know though, if everyone else disagrees, please be consistent the other way and change all to "CPC" (along with other Chinese politics related articles too). Thank you! Joséthewikier (talk) 07:31, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems someone changed it recently from CCP. Regardless, the standard here would be intra-article, I think. I'll make it consistent. Remsense诉 07:32, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks to you! Joséthewikier (talk) 07:38, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  it's "CCP" not "CPC". 