Talk:Wait a Minute (The Pussycat Dolls song)

message: Would someone please check if "How many times, how many lies" is actually the next release, and if so move the information to its own article and revert this article?
CJHung 20:42, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2006

message: 102 does not count as a position, as it's the hot 100.  77 counts as its debut. SKS2K6 00:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Billboard position

message: The current cover is fake. Even Timbaland is mispelled as Timberland, and the photo is from the Blender Magazine photoshoot.
Amazon.de or HMV Australia now have the official cover available, someone should change that here too... Go here to ckeck it out : http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/B000N87ZM0.01._AA240_SCLZZZZZZZ_V44574676_.jpg
Agreed, whoever keeps changing the cover to one without any type of official confirmation would you please stop it.  This is supposed to be an encyclopedia with facts, not some fans work from a magazine photoshoot.  This is the official cover, as you can see here with its front and back covers:
http://www.amazon.de/Wait-Minute-Pussycat-Dolls/dp/B000N87ZM0/ref=pd_ka_5/302-3289337-0287221?ie=UTF8&s=music&qid=1173813329&sr=8-5
#All edits have to be explained and sourced; you can't expect editors to know what you did and why you did it by telepathy.
#Please sign all messages to Talk pages using four tildes: ~~~~.
#If you open an editing account (free, no strings, simple to do) you can up-load the correct image and add it to the article. --Mel Etitis  (Talk) 22:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Cover 

message: Song IS notable - according to the notability page on songs this song would be a "good candidate for notability", as it fills the criterion for #1 - "Has appeared in the Top 20 of a national singles chart in a large or medium sized country." (Peaked at #16 in Australia), and #7 - "Has been...the subject of a music video that played on a major music network." (The music video was played on several major music channels at some point or another). I reckon this probably makes it notable to stay, so I'm going to remove the notability tag at the top of the page. --Tyron1 08:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 

message: :Image:Wait a minute.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:22, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wait a minute.JPG