Talk:Case White

message: Is this statement "The Germans, characteristically, quickly caught on," showing some pro-Nazi bias?  Specifically, the word characteristically?  Otherwise, I don't understand it.  T-bonham (talk) 02:28, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Be WP:BOLD and edit it. Peacemaker67  (send... over) 04:34, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias?

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below.  There was no GFDL history at the move target needing preservation. -GTBacchus(talk) 03:44, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move 2006

message: There is very little evidence to support such a bold statement. The Axis had several Ustasa there as well as 3 Italian divisions but nowhere have I read that Chetniks were involved and aiding the Nazi's at least not those under Draza Mihailovic. I suggest we remove the reference. Again there is no real proof that Chetniks were even there. If there were Chetniks it was a very small amount and certainly one's who had left the main army and formed their own that differed from that of Draza's because as we all know Draza was completely against Nazi's and the Ustasa regime.
- What I've heard from talking to some partisans and also to a son of Ustasha, not only were Chetniks there, but Ustashas and partisans allied in that single battle to totally defeat Chetniks. 78.3.79.60 16:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chetnik participation in question 

message: Shouldn't the proper name be "Battle of the Neretva", Neretva being a river and all? --DIREKTOR (TALK) 12:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is unclear to me why this article is titled 'Battle of the Neretva'. The most common usage in key texts on this operation refer to the subject matter of this article as 'The Fourth Offensive'(Roberts) or 'Operation Weiss'(Roberts, Milazzo & Tomasevich). Tomasevich makes it clear on pg 231 of Vol 1 that the Battle of the Neretva was the final phase of Operation Weiss. The terms are therefore not interchangeable. The Battle of Neretva is only a subset of Operation Weiss. I propose moving the article to 'Fourth anti-Partisan Offensive' so that it encompasses the entire operation and make it consistent with the other anti-Partisan Offensives.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peacemaker67 (talk • contribs) 03:09, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 

message: I think that the downed bridge in this article is not he original one. I tthink that is is replica from the movie. -- Bojan  19:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The bridge 

message: Following agreement here (Talk:Battle_of_Kozara), I am moving this article to 'Case White (1943)' per the German name with disambiguation from the Invasion of Poland article. Please read the discussion for reasoning. The scope of the article will not change. Peacemaker67 (talk) 02:44, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should just move to "Case White". We can then use the  template to disambiguate and get rid of the special disambig page. -- Director (talk) 07:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Case White (1943) 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Case White. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130511010749/http://znaci.net/00002/T311_175/359_568.htm to http://www.znaci.net/00002/T311_175/359_568.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:40, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Since this information is from RS it is very valuable information. Few people in the world know that information and it is tied to the battle itself. Mikola22 (talk) 18:50, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This information is not relevant and unbalanced. In the middle of the description of the fighting, you suddenly insert data on ethnic composition of only one brigade of three dozen (). And why not social? How many workers were there and how many peasants? Not all information from RS is appropriate. This information could be appropriate, for example, in the Order of Battle section, along with data on other brigades.--Nicoljaus (talk) 21:56, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This is just an attempt to make a point about the makeup of the Partisans which isn't relevant to this article. Just drop it. Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 23:27, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of the Neretva 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:34, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Is this topic the primary meaning of "Case White"? I think the Polish operation is more well known by this name. Srnec (talk) 05:09, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I think it is. Case White isn't even listed as a bolded alternative in the lead of the Invasion of Poland article, and Forczyk's Osprey book title is the only real mention of it in the body and refs. However, other than the Yugoslav-centric "Fourth Enemy Offensive", there is no other real common name for this one. Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 10:06, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: When I search GScholar of GBooks for "Case White" + "World War", I get many more Polish results than Yugoslav. The invasion of Poland, obviously, was a much bigger deal and I think it shows up more regardless of how often Case White is used to refer to it relative to other terms (like 'invasion of Poland'). Srnec (talk) 16:01, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title