Talk:Preity Zinta

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Preity Zinta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060323185651/http://www.businesswireindia.com/PressRelease.asp?b2mid=9273 to http://www.businesswireindia.com/PressRelease.asp?b2mid=9273
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Your attention is drawn to this report on WP:ERRORS by  : "". Per WP:V and WP:BLPSOURCES, please do not change it without a high-quality reliable source. It is unacceptable that such unverified claims on living people exist in a featured article - if this is typical of the article's factual accuracy, we should raise a FA review and get it thoroughly re-checked, or delisted. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:52, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, I don't understand what tone problems there are above (unless you're talking about TRM's comment, in which case he'll answer for himself) - but WP:BLPSOURCES is one of the most serious policies we must adhere to - we have to get the article right. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

text: Thanks Blof, for stepping in. The mistake was on the Tribune article, not on this page. Mistakes happen, and I might have missed it. I obviously know for a fact that today is her birthday (from interviews and other stuff) but a proper source was just added. Twitter of course shows her celebrating with her friends and thanking her fans and followers for their birthday wishes, which is another piece of evidence. Shahid • Talk2me 19:14, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that, Sahid. I was having difficulty determining which date was right, and frustrated that people were just reverting without supplying an additional source. Unfortunately the confusion has meant she couldn't be featured on the main page today. :-( Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:09, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:36, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:07, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: Dear Lectonar I work as an agency representative of Preity Zinta. So she had personally requested to make these changes to her wikipedia pagePriety Zinta but these changes keep getting reverted:
These changes are requested by her :
1. | image = New Priety Zinta by Abhishek Pate.jpg
   | caption            = PrietyZinta in 2019
2. Following Heaven on Earth, Preity Zinta was highest-paid actress till 2008, when she decided to take a break from cinema/acting and into sports business by investing in a cricket team in Indian premier league. 
3. </ref> Subhash K Jha of Times of India magazine called the film Goofy Zany and Outrageously Fun
(Following a five-year sabbatical, Zinta starred opposite Sunny Deol as an aggressive Varanasi-based wife in Neeraj Pathak's action comedy Bhaiaji Superhit (2018). Subhash K Jha of Times of India magazine called the film Goofy Zany and Outrageously Fun)
4. ===Selected filmography===
* Krrish (2006)
* Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna (2006)
* Jaan-E-Mann (2006)
* Jhoom Barabar Jhoom (2007)
* Om Shanti Om (2007)
* The Last Lear (2008)
* Heroes (2008 film) (2008)
* Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi (2008) 
* Heaven on Earth (2008 film) (2008)
* Main Aurr Mrs Khanna (2009)
* Ishkq in Paris (2013)
* Happy Ending (film) (2014)
* Kaadhal Vennila (2016)
* Ivan Oru Thunichalkaran (2017)
* Bhaiaji Superhit (2018)
}}
:As I have been contacted by User:KevinThomas71293 on my talk-page, I find it appropriate to move the request here. I have no knowledge of the subject. Lectonar (talk) 07:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition 

message: Apologies, I thought Shahid had been reverted. I do think the older image is more suitable though.† Encyclopædius 14:21, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main image 

message: User:Shshshsh Yesterday I removed information about Goodenough's profession because this page is not about him. It was restored by someone else and the info about his earlier connection with Zinta was added by someone else. But you deleted the information about how he connected with Zinta. If you are dedicated to removing 'irrelevant' info, then this blatant distraction about his profession needs to be removed first. 122.170.61.84 (talk) 12:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not blatant distraction - his occupation is very much relevant - we're presenting her husband and his basic background. Him having an opinion about Zinta's earlier controversy is not. Shahid • Talk2me 12:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It is distraction because he is not notable thus any details about him unrelated to the main subject violate WP:DUE. Your reasoning about calling the coverage he got by reliable sources for being a witness in a report filed by Zinta sounds nothing more than WP:JDL. 122.170.61.84 (talk) 12:39, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: First, consensus must be reached before information that has been here for years is removed and similarly, when contentious information is added, so I thank you for reverting yourself and for starting this discussion. No, it's not a case of JDL at all, but a matter of WP:DUE. It is relevant who her husband is and what his occupation is, that's very basic. By constrast, it is not relevant where they met and that he was a witness somewhere as it adds no value (the first reaction it evokes is "so?") - their history together is more suitable for magazines. Although maybe it's a matter of wording and we could incorporate it somehow without making it sound out of place. Shahid • Talk2me 13:17, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: And what do you suggest? The IP is certainly correct that the person in the question has been significantly covered "by reliable sources for being a witness in a report" and this is precisely why I included the info. While your reaction would be "so?", my reaction would be "oh he was already well known to Preity Zinta before the marriage". In shorter words, I say this information is more important than his profession. AnM2002 (talk) 05:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have any doubt she knew him before the marriage? I can give you many other things he was significantly covered for which do not merit a mention here. I see someone's removed the fact he was her "longtime boyfriend" and that could first settle your question. As for him being a witness, well, if they were together at the time then it's merely obvious, unless it was where and how they first met, which would be meaningful and I believe it's not the case. Shahid • Talk2me 15:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Goodenough