Talk:Republic-Ford JB-2

message: The name of this article is doubly erronious; while the JB-2 and Loon were essentially the same weapon, the JB-2 was not named "Loon", and the "Loon" was not the JB-2! The U.S. Army Air Force version of the missile was designated 'JB-2', while the Navy version was 'Loon' (with a variety of designations added to the name). - The Bushranger One ping only 05:17, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 

message: The image attached to this article is of the V-1 flying bomb, and not the loon. I am fairly sure US armament manufacturers did not put German designations on the weapon casing.
: Maybe not, but US museums trying to set up a WWII exhibit do. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: Does Loon derive from balloon? --Helium4 (talk) 23:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably more likely to be Loon, the bird. - BilCat (talk) 23:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Loon" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Republic-Ford JB-2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090430081034/http://www.planesoffame.org/airshows/2009/schedule.php to http://www.planesoffame.org/airshows/2009/schedule.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604020157/http://www.hill.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5675 to http://www.hill.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5675
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604020157/http://www.hill.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5675 to http://www.hill.af.mil/library/factsheets/factsheet.asp?id=5675
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: This site puts the number built at 1292, & says all were by Willys-Overland (calling it a "well-kept secret). True?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 17:01, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Although they had a sub-contract to build the airframes perhaps Republic built the first 99 themselves ? MilborneOne (talk) 23:22, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

text: This paper https://scholarworks.iupui.edu/bitstream/handle/1805/5517/JB2%20Thesis%20Final.pdf;sequence=1 says that Willys-Overland built 1292 of the 1382 JB2 produced. They didnt build the engines, control systems or boosters. MilborneOne (talk) 23:47, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thx. That page does say Ford built the pulsejets, & I had a suspicion W-O was building airframes (only) to licence. I learn something new every day. TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 01:26, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diff'rent strokes 

message: This article states "The JB-2 had nothing more advanced than what the Germans had already placed aboard their V-1 for guidance." This is most incorrect. The United States concluded that the V-1 was hopelessly inaccurate. The JB-2 had a radio beacon for tracking by a SCR-584 radar or another air or sea-born substitute. A radio command guidance system was used which ultimately provided greatly improved accuracy. See: Worrell, Kenneth P., Evolution of the Cruise Missile, Air University Press, Maxwell AFB, Alabama, 1985, pg 65. Also see: Stumpf, David K., Regulus: America's First Nuclear Submarine Missile, Turner Publishing Company, 1996. The last flight at Holloman in October 1948. See: Tagg, Martin D. We Develop Missiles, Not Air, The Legacy of Early Missile, Rocket, Instrumentation, and Aeromedical Research Development at Holloman Air Force Base, Holloman Air Force Base Cultural Resource Publication No. 2, 1995., pg 93. Please excuse me for being picky but correction of this article is in order.
Mark Lincoln (talk) 23:19, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:So fix it. BilCat (talk) 23:26, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences from the V-1 

message: As always I prefer published sources to online ones. Books seldom return a 404. Also someone accessing the Wikipedia might be at the first stage of some serious research. Under any circumstances most online sources on early rocketry seldom provide sufficient background to understand what happened. In the case of the JB-2 the dispute over who would control missiles was a hot issue in the Pentagon for the next decade. It was an essential portion of the JB-2 program.
Mark Lincoln (talk) 20:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed a couple of typos in your edits in the "Postwar testing" section, but I think paragraphs 1 and 4 there need to be reconciled somehow since paragraph 4 still reads like "the former Alamogordo Army Air Field" had not been mentioned earlier. Mark Taylor (talk) 02:16, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History and Sources