Talk:Black project

message: Why does no page of the Stealthe Blimp exist?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.249.206.32 (talk) 04:23, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stealth Blimp 

message: A Black Project or Black Program is also a military/gov't project where the researchers, as per the RFP(s), cannot publish externally (e.g., refereed research in their field) anything about the project.  That is a really common usage, and it is totally missing here.  There's nothing secretive about it -- it is told to the researchers up front when they ask for money to work on the project.  So why no mention -- too mundane?  ;-)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.170.29.114 (talk) 18:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no mention of funding/publication use? 

message: I can't find any other information on this supposed project, and it looks suspiciously like "Arse-Lick." I'm not deleting this, but if someone knows this is just a joke and not an actual project, I would suggest it.
(Tha Pyngwyn 19:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project ARCELIC2? 

message: How can a non-existent project be used as an example of alternate funding?
:The point is to illistrate that the funding did not come through government channels, but from agents operating outside of their governments. That the project may not have existed is in this case non-notable, as this is the best example to show evidenceof such covert funding. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding this supposed alternate source of funding, the Montauk Project page makes references to a lot of conspiracy theories but not one to Nazi gold. Shouldn't either the Montauk Project link from this article be removed or the reference to Nazi gold be added to the linked article? Strategia 20:18, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional Proof 

message: i included Area 58 as a classified project given the NRO classification guide. Dogue (talk) 17:21, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area 58 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Black project. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://space.com/businesstechnology/technology/black_triangle_020805.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It ought to be included on this list, but I'm unsure where it would fit. It isn't hasn't been declassified (and shouldn't be, but that's just my irrelevant opinion), but neither is it "rumored" because the remains of the aircraft left behind at UBL's compound in Pakistan prove that it exists at least in prototype form. I would add it under a "Classified, but publicly known" heading, but that doesn't really make sense. Maybe "Confirmed classified black projects"? Spartan198 (talk) 05:38, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stealth Black Hawk 

message: It was recently announced. It was highly rumored for a year or two and was only officially announced after that. 129.137.96.11 (talk) 14:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can you add the b-21 to the list?