Talk:Zsa Zsa Gabor

message: All pictures related to this article are her when she was much younger. A lot of pictures for other Actors are more recent. Do we have a more recent picture of her? 124.254.78.121 (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia's copyright rules prevent most news-related and more recent photos. The older publicity photos are usually OK. --Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 07:11, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Also Zsa Zsa Gabor is primarily an actress, and this picture shows her at the height of her fame as an actress and is technically correct. Also it's not that often that you can use really good studio pictures for people here and need to settle for awful "on the street" pictures. We've got one, why get rid of it. Dollvalley (talk) 11:24, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: "In 1974, she purchased a two-story Bel Air home from Elvis Presley" ... —>  two-storey
66.222.242.81 (talk) 00:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks.  Salvio  Let's talk about it! 12:49, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 66.222.242.81, 3 February 2011 

message: As a native speaker of Hungarian, I just wanted to remark that the maiden name of Zsa Zsa's mother cannot have been "Tilleman Jánosné": This is a Hungarian married name, a composite of the male name "Tilleman János" with the suffix "né", literally translating to "Tilleman János's wife".
The article on Jolie Gábor states that her maiden name was Janka. I don't know whether this is correct, but at least it's not obviously impossible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.111.86.47 (talk) 11:55, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother's maiden name 

message: The current Wikipedia article today states that Ms. Gabor was hospitalized in early January of 2011 and subsequently had surgery "to have a portion of her right leg amputated below the knee after cancerous lesions were discovered by her doctors". According to a news article I read today the reason for the amputation was gangrene, not cancerous lesions. (Associated Press, March 2, 2011 "Zsa Zsa Gabor taken to hospital by ambulance": "Most of Gabor's right leg was amputated in January because of gangrene.") —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.111.228.43 (talk) 23:47, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding Health: Gangrene, not cancer lesions 

message: In the "Personal life" section appears the following: "While Gabor was still married to Conrad Hilton, she once admitted to having sexual relations with her stepson Nicky, a future husband of Elizabeth Taylor's." This leads me to ask, he was a future husband of Elizabeth Taylor's what? Surely it should read as, "While Gabor was still married to Conrad Hilton, she once admitted to having sexual relations with her stepson Nicky, a future husband of Elizabeth Taylor." (i.e. without the 's) 142.140.230.53 (talk) 16:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: There's always a sudden influx of anonymous edits, a high proportion deleted, after celebrity news stories. But continuous death announcements are way out of line, if not dangerous. Is it time to semi-protect? It seems that if a contributor is not willing to take 15 seconds to sign up as a "serious" editor, they should not be allowed to post minutia or corrupt newsworthy articles.--Wikiwatcher1 (talk) 19:07, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protect? 

message: I found it ironic that the only picture on the wiki page depicting her with men, the most prominent guy on it is international playboy Porfirio Rubirosa whom she had an affair with while he was married to Barbara Hutton. In his home-country the Dominican Republic he is quite well known for having had said affair. A story tells of the Dominican Presidential yacht that dictator Trujillo lent to his buddy Porfirio sailing into New York harbor with a large sign on the side announcing "Zsa Zsa Slept Here". It's anecdotal at best so I didn't write it up, but thought its interesting to note here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Singularity (talk • contribs) 22:31, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Porfirio Rubirosa 

message: In the "Legal difficulties" section, consider blotting out one or a few letters in the quoted profanity "This happens every f**king time I go shopping!!".  Everyone who reads it, including young adults, will know exactly what Zsa Zsa said, while at the same time get the message that communities, including Wikipedia, have language standards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.171.247.181 (talk) 05:30, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Of course, we all do. But no, it has to be quoted as is. There is no censorship on Wikipedia, except when required legally under relatively narrow circumstances. Yours, Quis separabit? 22:23, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Did she actually say that during (or in connexion with) the incident? Or did she just say it in the opening titles of "Naked Gun 2½: The Smell of Fear?" Shotguntony (talk) 17:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: The info summary shows:
Conrad Hilton (1942–1946; divorced)
but in the more detailed Personal Life section, as well as numerous other websites, their marriage is said to have ended in 1947. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.36.104.46 (talk) 14:28, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: Can you add the category :Category:Hungarian people to this bio? 69.125.134.86 (talk) 14:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  If it isn't there it is because it is too general. There are myriad other categories detailing her ethnic background and her current citizenship. Yours, Quis separabit? 22:25, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: Wiki articles have trouble suggesting the pop culture importance of figures like Zsa Zsa. In this article she comes off as a minor actress, with no suggestion that she was a major celebrity, let's call it. Zsa Zsa was famous the way Paris Hilton or the Kardashians are famous-- and she stayed at that starring level of celebrity in the tabloids and gossip columns for a good forty years! That's no mean feat. She created a role, in the American mind, an ideal of European glamour combined with sex. Bob Hope, or later, Johnny Carson had only to say her first name and people were ready to laugh, knowing the role. She was not a film star, her starring role was as "Zsa Zsa" in the press and on talk shows, and she played Zsa Zsa perfectly for 40 years. Celebrity of this kind is itself a version of acting stardom.Profhum (talk) 21:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please don't compare Zsa Zsa or anyone with any class or taste or talent (however much a bitch Gabor may have been) with the untalented, the lowlife, the thuggish and the mediocre, which is what comprises most of today's music, outside of country music. No matter how successful the current crop I referred to is or may be for now, they can never be forgiven for introducing "twerking" and turning it into a popular and successful attention-grabbing gimmick. Quis separabit? 21:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pop culture stardom — the celebrity as role in itself

message: Could her name's pronunciation be changed to [ˈʒɑʒɑ ˈɡaːbɔr]? (http://emmasaying.com/?s=Zsa+Zsa+Gabor) It's a lot closer to the Hungarian pronunciation. Kapostamas (talk) 01:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: There reads: In 2011, her right leg was amputated above the knee to save her life from an infection.
"Above the knee"? The part of leg above the knee is thigh, so her thigh was amputated? It is called "above knee amputation" but there should read the leg below the knee is amputated. It might be okay to say it as it is, but to me that doesn't sound right. 85.217.34.203 (talk) 23:23, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amputation 

message: Gabor was imprisoned for 3 days for her assault against an officer. 
165.228.193.248 (talk) 07:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Amortias (T)(C) 12:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 April 2015 

message: the roles need to be in boxes. that way, its  more coherent.
If no one is willing to do that, i will start doing it. Any one support or oppose this?
Winterysteppe (talk) 21:52, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format the filmography section 

message: I have completed the revision of the filmography. converted it into actual tables. 04:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography updated 

message: 12.204.201.20 (talk) 19:09, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. EvergreenFir (talk) Please  20:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2016 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Zsa Zsa Gabor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20040603074355/http://www.mugshots.net:80/zsa_zsa_gabor/ to http://www.mugshots.net/zsa_zsa_gabor
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090307040411/http://www.princegermany.com:80/press/press145.html to http://www.princegermany.com/press/press145.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100817190951/http://hosted.ap.org:80/dynamic/stories/U/US_PEOPLE_ZSA_ZSA_GABOR?SITE=TXBEA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT to http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_PEOPLE_ZSA_ZSA_GABOR?SITE=TXBEA&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150120133017/http://life.time.com:80/icons/zsa-zsa-gabor-rare-photos-of-the-actress-and-socialite-in-1951/ to http://life.time.com/icons/zsa-zsa-gabor-rare-photos-of-the-actress-and-socialite-in-1951/#1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Why does the infobox claim that her birthday is either February 6, 1917 or that same day in 1918? The personal life section already says that her 99th birthday was February 6, 2016, where she was hospitalized two days later; that means her birthday obviously was in 1917 and not 1918. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.61.112.232 (talk) 21:37, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: According to her New York Times obituary, she was "born Sari Gabor in Budapest in 1917, 1918 or 1919 — she always gave a birth date of Feb. 6 or 7, but not the year, though most sources suggest it was 1917." Pburka (talk) 23:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The actual year has never been confirmed. (Fgskl (talk) 02:01, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be my point, yes. 24.14.224.157 (talk) 02:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

text: Note that the New York Times obituary now confirms that her birth year was 1917. Pburka (talk) 01:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthday? 

message: Can anybody remove the BLP notice at the top of the page? I can't figure out how. A lad insane (Channel 2) 23:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP notice

message: * About the  template: its purpose is not to indicate that there has been a recent death, but to note that circumstances are uncertain.Useful for murders, and the like. Otherwise, put the information in the text, and that is sufficient.The template was never intended for, and the guide to use for the template indicates it should not be used to tag articles about recently deceased individuals.This death is not a surprise, it is reported, and she's been on life support for years. No confusion surrounding circumstances of death.By the way, this project is not a newspaper.Yellowdesk (talk) 00:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Editors: see also the discussion here. —ATS 🖖 talk 00:54, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent death template 

message: 63.149.188.52 (talk) 14:06, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. 🔯 Sir Joseph 🍸(talk) 15:19, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this was done.  Thanks for the heads up, IP editor. -- WV ● ✉ ✓  20:25, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 December 2016 

message: In this phrase "In his autobiography, television host Merv Griffin, who often squired Gabor younger sister Eva socially", please change "Gabor younger sister" to "Gabor's younger sister". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.189.252.18 (talk) 17:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, plus a little more.  Thank you for bringing this to our attention. -- WV ● ✉ ✓  21:17, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: It's obviously wrong for a drive-by editor who has never contributed to this bio before to cut relevant early life details without any valid reason, other than they apparently don't approve. Doing so by claiming that some details about Gabor's mother creates undue weight is ridiculous. The details, which in effect explain how Gabor even made it to the U.S. is important, if not vital, when the facts are from reliable sources. And coming from her mother's bio, makes it pretty reliable. Why anyone would drive by and undermine just this significant and brief part of her bio makes no sense. And despite the fact that it's been part of a stable bio for over five years, and the deleter has been told to discuss their rationale on the talk page and try to get consensus, they have ignored that request and prefer edit warring. --Light show (talk) 21:39, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not a drive-by editor by any means - please keep the personal commentary and attempt to dismiss my contributions out of this discussion.  The over-detail about the mother does not belong in this article, it's undue weight and, because it's about the mother's life rather than the article subject, it does not help the reader to better understand the article subject.  It does help the reader better understand the mother but has no direct relation to the life of the mother with the article subject.  The mother has an article, that's where the content belongs. -- WV ● ✉ ✓  21:44, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: By "drive-by" editor, I was referring to the fact that you just started trashing editing her bio a few hours ago. My other comments still stand, that your personal opinion about how Zsa Zsa and her family made it to the U.S. "has no direct relation to her life" is absurd. --Light show (talk) 22:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't care what your reasoning is for calling me a drive-by editor.  It's rude and dismissive.  Not to mention that everyone has to have that first edit to an article to begin editing it.  Starting to edit an article doesn't make one a drive-by editor.  Aside from being rude, your name-calling is  inaccurate as well as a personal attack, therefore it's inappropriate and unnecessary.   Sorry, but I don't agree with your assessment of the undue weight you want to remain in the article. -- WV ● ✉ ✓  23:42, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: We have different examples of what kind of editing is "rude and dismissive." When a new editor to a bio comes by and deletes a large and relevant early life section of a stable and old article, based on their opinion, "article is about Zsa Zsa Gabor not her mother - disagree, take your concerns to the article talk page, please," that's a clearer example. You had the obligation to discuss it first, and not expect others to defend themselves to you, after the fact. And even after your deletions were restored, you simply reverted dismissively and rudely without discussing. The duty and obligation, as you know, was on you. While it's unacceptable for pre-existing editors to express ownership, it's much worse when a new editor does it. --Light show (talk) 00:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You seem to be misunderstanding my comments above.  Your unwarranted attack on me equates rude and dismissive, not your edits.  I am not a new editor.  I'm not doing a drive-by.  The old, "stable" content was inappropriate for this article, but appropriate for the mother's article.  My reasoning n't in the edit summary was clear explanation as to why it was inappropriate.  You started to edit war, you disagreed, therefore, as someone you don't consider a new and drive by editor, I suggested you discuss rather than get angry and revert again. In further regard to talk page "duty" and drive-bys, ownership mentality, you haven't edited this article for months until her death.  All told in the six years you've been editing the article, you've produced 86 changes to it.  Only 18 times, in the course of those edits, have you discussed or made changes to the article talk page.  I note a number of reversions of other editors' work in six years' time, but you haven't attempted discussion at the talk page, prior to yesterday, in four years.  From my observation point, that could - to many - prove ownership mentality (since you brought up ownership).  As it is, with the cooperative editing among several over the last 36 hours, I think the article is now improved over its previous, so-called "stable", version. -- WV ● ✉ ✓  13:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

text: While you are not a 'new' editor, you've been blocked before for contentious actions on Wiki - so, let's turn the wattage down a bit on your self-imposed halo, WV.50.111.2.50 (talk) 21:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drive-by deleting relevant life details 

message: In the ITN/RD discussion for Alan Thicke, Masem implied that blue-linked articles would be an acceptable source, assuming Gabor was listed in that article as being in the cast. Is that a wrong interpretation? Most of the cn-tagged films have links to the film articles with her shown as a cast member. --Light show (talk) 23:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: She needs to be major cast member of a film, not just any cast member. Her name should have appeared on the movie's posters or in the opening credit roll so it is crystal clear she was in the movie, following the blue-linked criteria above. Otherwise, it should be inline sourced. --MASEM (t) 23:39, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Clear enough now. Thanks for explaining. --Light show (talk) 23:55, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

text: One other question Masem, or anyone: where can I have IMDB re-evaluated as a RS for at least its cast lists? I needed to find a source for her in Sang et lumières, which IMDB showed as having been renamed Love in a Hot Climate (1954), for instance. IMDB was also the only place that had the poster image, which showed her as a star. And since IMDB typically has trailers which give cast names, it would be a great help if some of it was a RS. It's changed quite a bit since WP's RS guidelines were made. --Light show (talk) 00:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem as I understand it is that it is still user-generated. They have admins that try to make sure no absolutely bogus material is entered (much like we have here), and they may have access to better databases/source materials to check (eg like seemingly the only source for posters/trailers), but still are effectively a Wiki anyone can edit. --MASEM (t) 00:41, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Understood. --Light show (talk) 01:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are blue-linked articles reliable sources for actors? 

message: That pink box with text at the end of the article doesn't make any sense. It starts with the words "those words" with no clear reference. Remove it? Or clarify what it's about? MurielMary (talk) 11:23, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering about that. It makes no sense to me either MurielMary. I say remove it. Pauciloquence (talk) 11:31, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

text: I agree about removing it, and thank you for doing so, .  It's not a quote from Gabor, it's not notable, it's basically a piece of trivia wrapped in a pink quote box.  In other words, fluffy filler and not appropriate for this encyclopedia article. -- WV ● ✉ ✓  15:51, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

text: The original box had only a short quote by Richard Corliss which he wrote at the end of his his Time article, which itself was a tribute to her. He was Time's movie editor. If anyone wants to read the article to get the full context, they just need to click on the source link. I see no problem with including it, either as "pink fluffy filler" box, or as an inline quote with more context to his article: Light show (talk) 19:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

text: Well, we frown on fluffy pink boxes on Wiki. 50.111.2.50 (talk) 21:47, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pink box with text? 

message: Apparently, one of the adopted-in-name-only "sons" just died, as well.  I don't think it deserves a mention since he wasn't actually a son and is trivia.  Have removed the inclusion.  Opinions? -- WV ● ✉ ✓  13:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Adopted" son death 

message: On this article it says she married to her first spouse in 1937, yet on the spouse's article it says 1935 and I don't know which one is right. Does anyone know? -A lad insane (Channel 2) 00:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Year discrepancy

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Zsa Zsa Gabor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160410142656/http://f.tqn.com/y/marriage/1/S/3/W/103403975.jpg to http://f.tqn.com/y/marriage/1/S/3/W/103403975.jpg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If I remember correctly, , the attached reference does not state definitively that they left after the Nazi occupation occured.  The wording was changed to give a nod to the occupation occuring during that time period, however, nothing that has been found so far from a reliable reference proves they left during or after the occupation.  Her mother is a different story: she actually escaped because she left during the occupation.  Gabor only left, she didn't escape, because there's no proof anything occupation-wise was happening at the time of her departure from the country.  -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 18:50, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I revised the section on the timing of the emigration of Zsa Zsa and her mother from Hungary in order to improve clarity. This was reverted  by Winkelvi on January 17, 2017. The current text does not make sense to me.
"While her mother escaped Hungary during the same time period of the Nazi occupation of Budapest, Gabor left the country in 1941, three years prior to the takeover."
What is the word "same" referring to? The same period as what? Was something removed and it used to say something like "While her mother and sister escaped ... during the same period of the takeover?" In this case "same" could mean that mother and sister left during the same period. But as it stands, I don't think it makes sense. Zsa Zsa left before the takeover, so "same" cannot refer to her leaving during the same period as her mother.
Here is what I wrote before it was reverted:
"While her mother escaped Hungary during the Nazi occupation of Budapest, Gabor left the country in 1941, three years prior to the takeover."
Maybe things can be clarified if someone explains to me what is wrong with this version. Thanks.
Domandologo (talk) 18:42, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If I remember correctly, , the attached reference does not state definitively that they left after the Nazi occupation occured.  The wording was changed to give a nod to the occupation occuring during that time period, however, nothing that has been found so far from a reliable reference proves they left during or after the occupation.  Her mother is a different story: she actually escaped because she left during the occupation.  Gabor only left, she didn't escape, because there's no proof anything occupation-wise was happening at the time of her departure from the country.  -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 18:50, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Escape of parents - change in the wording of the time period 

message: The sentence involving the Ceder Rapids article has a typo.  The word "for" is missing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.122.3.242 (talk) 17:40, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure that not "by" is missing? She wrote to that Gazette?(KIENGIR (talk) 22:58, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: So, she's been dead for four years. Can the BLP be removed now please? Thank you! Gamle Kvitrafn (talk) 21:02, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP removal 

message: Whatever happened to Meow Meow, Zsa Zsa's cat?  Is she in cat heaven? Lord Milner (talk) 13:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meow Meow 

message: There need to be some changes in the burial details for Zsa Zsa Gabor.
It is true that some part of the ashes are together with her Sister Eva Gabor at Westwood Memorial Park in Los Angeles and not in the gold urn. More then 4,5 years her last husband took the other part of her ashes home in that golden urn.  This large part of ashes was yesterday buried at Kerepesi Cemetery at Budapest (Parzelle 41) . From this ashes, her husband took again some parts to take it home or traveling around the world. It would be great if some body can fix this informations ..... Greetings from Hamburg, Parsifal von Pallandt Benedetto16 (talk) 19:12, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 July 2021 

message: Zia Zsa Gabor acted in a couple episodes of The Love Boat in 1977, but that’s not mentioned in her career section. And it should be. Just saying 174.214.0.54 (talk) 04:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Love Boat 

message: It' impossible for her to have a relationship with Mustada Kemal Atatürk. He died in 1938 when she was 21 years old. She didn't come to Turkey, neither did Aratürk go to the USA. However she had a relationship with the Turkish actor Muzaffer Tema. 212.253.204.216 (talk) 11:14, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other relationships 

message: Jolie Gabor; Vilmos Gábor; History of the Jews in Portugal#Portuguese Ambassador in Budapest, 1944; Carlos Sampaio Garrido#Gabor family
Diplomatic telegrams regarding Gabors in Budapest and Switzerland :
*
::
:....0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 07:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Nazi occupation, Budapest, Gabor parents: 8 July 1944

message: The quote: "She's a woman from the court of Louis XV who has somehow managed to live in the 20th century, undamaged by the PTA ..." references the article on parent-teacher association. In 2021 someone asked to clarify the term PTA and the link got inserted. But what is that supposed to mean in this context? That she seems above boring everyday life of regular people? I find the quote more confusing than helpful.--176.199.18.181 (talk) 07:18, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  PTA? 

message: Theatre credits: Please change year of Der singende Traum to 1934
According to the comprehensive Staggs biography, she debuted in Der singende Traum in August 1934 and this is stated in the Career section. But the Theatre section wrongly lists Der singende Traum as a credit from 1935. The latter needs to be corrected. PromQueenCarrie (talk) 09:08, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 11:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2023 

message: ADD: Citizenship: Hungary (1917-1935), Turkey (1935-1949), United States (1949-death)
Confirmed through declassified FBI files: https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/zsa-zsa-gabor-fbi-30946/#file-202782 Zzg1917 (talk) 12:43, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Rehsarb (talk) 14:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 January 2024 

message: Add Turkish Citizenship between 1935 and 1949. As a result of her marriage to Burhan Belge, she gained Turkish citizenship and a Diplomatic passport, which she used to emigrate to the USA in 1941. She naturalized as a US citizen in 1949.
This is outlined in the FBI files which were declassified in 2019: 
https://www.muckrock.com/news/archives/2018/aug/03/fbi-zsa-zsa/ Zzg1917 (talk) 20:38, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Geardona (talk to me?) 02:06, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 January 2024