lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:B. J. Ward (actress)

message: The infobox says B.J. was born in 1953, and the list of categories includes "1953 births", but the article itself says she was born in 1944. Which year is correct? JHVipond (talk) 02:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Which birth year is correct?

message: These are two separate but related issues.
# What is her birth year?  There's one source currently being used that supports the 1954 year here.  I know nothing about how reliable that source is, it's possible that it's not reliable at all or of limited use (like IMDB) even though I see it is used elsewhere on Wikipedia. 
# This same source also claims that she was a former Playboy Bunny.  Again, not sure how reliable that is.  
To date I have not been able to find any other source to corroborate either of those claims.  The Playboy Bunny claim might be considered controversial which would fall under WP:BLP meaning that unless we're absolutely sure about the source we shouldn't include that information.  But if we can't trust that source on that piece of info, can we trust it for the birth date?  It's always possible that they got their information from an earlier version of this article. At this point I'm inclined to remove both the birth date (in its entirety) and the Playboy Bunny claim unless another reliable source(s) is found to support those claims.  Any other ideas? SQGibbon (talk) 15:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A different source was supplied for her years as a Playboy Bunny which definitely makes the 1954 birth year highly improbable.  Not sure whether Explayboybunnies.com is a reliable source, though.  For now her birth date has been removed entirely. I suspect the Playboy Bunny claim still needs a better source. SQGibbon (talk) 15:45, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Well, that site doesn't state where it gets its information and it is entirely possible that the list linked to is based on what the site owner has seen online like, say, on Wikipedia. That sort of thing does happen where something is inserted as a hoax on Wikipedia then gets quoted as true by on outside website which then gets used as a source on Wikipedia to support the hoax.  This doesn't mean that the Playboy Bunny claim is false but I would like to see a better source, a reliable source, for the claim. SQGibbon (talk) 17:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year again; Playboy Bunny 

message: I've seen her moniker on The Smurfs but she's not given on the voice list here; does anybody know who she was on the 1980's show?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:302:D85:4C39:AD69:CF8B:F87E:30C0 (talk) 05:17, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smurf role(s) 

message: Career and Filmography have redundant listings.
The organization and cross linking styles are different.  These could be consolidated? Moultingmajor (talk) 16:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career and Filmography have redundant listings.
Talk:B.W. Powe

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Merge to B. W. Powe which has been done already by someone.  —Wknight94 (talk) 17:41, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Support new name but there is an actual article at B. W. Powe.  There is already a merge request in both articles and I'd support the merge into B. W. Powe but this isn't really a move.  —Wknight94 (talk) 02:28, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:NHS Resolution

message: We have a sentence with 'we estimate', so I don't know the source of this, or where the bulk of this material has come from.  Stevebritgimp (talk) 13:40, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Talk:Babita

message: The Background section states "Her cousin is actress Sadhana Shivdasani", but the TOI interview linked to as reference says Babita was Sadhana's niece. Which one's correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.57.10.22 (talk) 09:23, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Babita is Sadhana's cousin or niece? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 06:09, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Babita →  – WP:NOPT. Jax 0677 (talk) 00:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 April 2024
Talk:NHS Pension Scheme

message: Does the NHS PS invest in tradable assests, and if so who controls these and how much is owned? Kevlar67 01:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Investing? 

message: KaylaMcCormack (talk) 18:44, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Amends for reiview
Talk:Babu Meman

message: I have raised a citation need over his stated birthplace. In the British book Shropshire Cricketers 1844-1988 by cricket statistician Tony Percival (published 1999) it is stated to be Lusaka, the present Zambian capital.Cloptonson (talk) 05:53, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace citation need
Talk:Carlo M. Cipolla

message: The analysis and commentary on the laws of stupidity is WP:OR and needs to be edited to remove personal opinion and to introduce citations. This is the reason I have added the OR tag. Fiddle Faddle 10:54, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not OR but a faithful summary, from what I can see. Have you read the book? --Nemo 18:31, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It is, however, not summarising the plot of a novel, where some latitude is allowed. Rather, it is analysing a published work, with originality, as the WP:OR policy firmly restricts. (There is not a single reference to another's description of the work. It is all original perspectives of one or more WP editors.) The 2013 OR tempate message is being returned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:246:C700:558:355F:9C9:2099:2794 (talk) 06:18, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research 

message: In the original essay, as retrieved from http://www.extremistvector.com/content/stupid.html, Cipolla calls the people in the left-top quadrant helpless, he doesn't use the word 'naive' and he has no (formal) name for the people who are in the origin of the axes. I have changed the article text (changed naive to helpless) and i'll update the graphic to reflect the original text. Vincedevries (talk) 23:44, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  naive or helpless? 

message: The article could do worse than to refine its scope in keeping with this scholar's obituary; per the Berkeley version, one of several available, Cipolla was "a leading economic historian of his generation." One would never know this from the focus of the article, before today's edits. So the article was restructured to indicate that his notability is in fact not a consequence of his one popular, non-economic text, but instead, his large corpus of economic writings, in Italian, and in translation. Rework today's edits to allow them to fit better here, if you wish, but please do not return the earlier insulting treatment.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:246:C700:558:355F:9C9:2099:2794 (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructured non-encyclopedic content
Talk:NHS primary care trust

message: As someone who isn't a health professional, I find this article quite hard to understand.  I came here as part of my effort to understand what the various things called "trusts" are for in the NHS, and I am not a great deal wiser after reading this article.
Is a Primary Care Trust a hospital? Is it a GP's surgery? GreenInker (talk) 07:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opacity 

message: List of former PCTs is more helpful as a separate itemRathfelder (talk) 14:13, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, the list is long and a list; whereas this is an article, they should remain separate. Have removed merge tag. Have also left a 'seealso' tag in the article so that readers can travel to the list if so desired. LT910001 (talk) 07:37, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:NHS Scotland

message: NHS Highland is its name...not NHS Highland and Argyll.  Removed Panthro (talk) 05:35, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The NHS in Scotland has shared problems with National Health Service (England) and some of its own that are not reflected in this article. Pleasetry (talk) 23:36, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A criticism sections is needed 
Talk:Baby D (rapper)

message: I have removed material from  that does not comply with our policy on the biographies of living persons. Biographical material must always be referenced from reliable sources, especially negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that must be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Scott Mac (Doc) 21:17, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Special health authority

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:02, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Special health authority (NHS) →  – Disambiguation not needed as no other similarly named entities elsewhere in other health systems etc. Article was previously at this name until undiscussed and unjustified move in July 2023 Elshad (talk) 10:38, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 November 2023
Talk:Strategic health authority

message: This page requires revision with regard to what will happen when the SHAs are abolished (due by 2010 according to Health Service Journal)
Amcdj (talk) 22:07, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Be BOLD Amcdj – You do the revision!--Aspro (talk) 23:07, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Bada (singer)

message: Since she is more popularly known as Bada, shouldn't the article title reflect that?  No one calls her by her given name, and articles like Cher seem to follow the rules (at least, what I think the rules are).  SKS2K6 08:12, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Where I'm from, people still know her by name "Sea", just because she's still more notable as being member of S.E.S than as solo singer. One could say "Sea" is just translation of "Bada", but a lot of people use international versions for international artists. She has been known here as "Sea" since S.E.S covered song sung by Finnish group Nylon Beat. Monni 08:39, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: At any case, shouldn't this page be under her stage name, whether is Sea or Bada?  I honestly don't care, although she's mostly known as Bada in the place that she is in the most. SKS2K6 03:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have nothing against renaming this entry. Bada already redirects here. Monni 04:18, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Baden Cooke

message: As per either a recent request at or because this article was listed as fully or partly unassessed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/Assessment I have just now completed a rating of the article and posted my results to this page. Those results are detailed above in the template box. Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, I am unable to leave detailed comments other than to make the following brief observation: no further comments at this time  However if you have specific questions, please write to me on my talk page and as time permits I will try to provide you with my reasoning. Please put my talk page on your watchlist if you do ask such a question because in the case of these responses I will only post my answer underneath your question. ALSO if you do not agree with the rating you can list it in the "Requesting an assessment section", and someone will take a look at it.--VS talk 08:43, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment completed for [[{{BASEPAGENAME}}]]
Talk:Emmanuel Yosip

message: What is his correct title? Is it Mar Emmanuel Emmanuel or Mar Emmanuel Yosip --A2raya07 20:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct title
Talk:Bader Al-Mutawa

message: Until he's actually a Forest player, announced on the official site, can we not have any more mention of the club here please?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.151.70.145 (talk) 15:25, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nottingham Forest 

message: Now titled "Bader Al-Mutwa", but article cites "Bader Al-Mutuwa" and 2007 Gulf Cup of Nations tries "Al-Mutawa". Dkreisst 04:51, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Name? 

message: A lot of information has been expunged from this page recently (by @Mishary94 mainly) - would it not be better to add a tag asking for citations, rather than just ripping it all out at once? OGBC1992 (talk) 13:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hello , I disagree with you. In Kuwait, there is a shortcoming regarding the statistics of Kuwaiti players, unlike other countries, where we can check the statistics.  Better to put a source in this case.
Hi @Mishary94, I agree it’s better to have a source but I think as these look like legitimate stats, rather than completely made up ones or vandalism, it would be best to request a citation first. OGBC1992 (talk) 23:36, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass removal of uncited stats
Talk:HP Autonomy/Archive 1

message: If you have been recruited to come here and add comments: Please be aware that the entire content dispute was resolved in October 2005 via a Wikipedia "Request for Comments" process.  This is not the article about Autonomy Systems, but rather a discussion page that mostly contains old comments provided during the RfC process.  Although you are free to add your own comments if you wish (as long as you don't delete or alter the comments of others) it probably isn't helpful to reopen the content dispute on this article. Both pro and anti Automony Systems contributors had ceased adding opinion to the article after the RfC closed, leaving a shorter but neutral article. I've kept this topic on my watch list to ensure that the article stays neutral. Also, please SIGN all comments with ~~~~.  Come on, you all work (or used to work) at a software development company. You should be able to figure out how to use a wiki! CarbonCopy (talk) 21:51, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I think the edits by Alan McBeth take this article to the point that the PoV dispute flag can be taken down.  Hopefully the company's proponents and adversaries will refrain from using this page to post unverifiable PoV materials in the future--FRS 20:58, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV achieved?

message: I came to this page via rfc... has the dispute been cleared up? The last entry I see is October 31
peace,
Sethie 00:34, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: current status

message: Feel free to add your own commentary to this discussion page.  However, deleting comments by others is vandalism.  Changing the comments of others to say something totally different from what they posted is a particularly serious form of vandalism.  If you represent Autonomy Systems, you are giving a very poor impression of your company by your behaviour, as have prior visitors to this page. CarbonCopy (talk) 02:01, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to anonymous blanking vandal
Talk:NHS Wales

message: Although it is not explicitly stated that NHS stands for National Health Service, it is mentioned that it was established in the National Health Service Act 1946, so that most readers would make the connection. The Welsh translation for NHS Wales is given as GIG Cymru, which doesn't seem to add much to a reader's knowledge. The translation for National Health Service should be given somewhere, but should it be () or just ()? Thoughts please. Daicaregos (talk) 18:46, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welsh translation for NHS Wales  

message: This page needs updating to reflect the reorganisation of NHS Wales in 2009.  Before 1 October 2009 there were 22 LHBs and 7 Trusts each covering a defined region but this 'two tiered' system has been abolished. There are now 7 integrated Health Boards in Wales which are single organisations responsible for delivering all healthcare services within a geographical area. There are also 3 'all Wales' Trusts: (1) Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust, (2) Velindre NHS Trust (cancer services) and (3) Public Health Wales. These are calles special NHS trusts becaure they are nationals trusts that cover the whole of Wales. 81.152.83.94 (talk) 12:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Page needs updating to correctly describe 2009 reorganisation
Talk:Mk 101 Lulu

message: The military ceased using the archaic expression 'depth charge' aeons ago, and our continued use of it will cause confusion when cross-referencing to other articles using the term NDB. Brian.Burnell 20:15, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, BEWARE of mistaken references to a Mk-34 Lulu NDB. This confusion arose because some who didn't know, assumed that the NDB used the same ref ID as the warhead, or physics package, which was the W34, as used on many other weapons; hence Mk-34 Lulu is incorrect. Brian.Burnell 20:19, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mk-101 Lulu NDB (Nuclear Depth Bomb)

message: Regarding the above, I was in charge of loading these on S2F aircraft in the period 1961-1963. They were loaded aboard aircraft on the hanger bay level and well secured in the bomb bay, so it is highly unlikely that one would "fall off" an aircraft on the flight deck. Plus, the bomb bay doors would be closed. In addition, there were two steps to arming the device. One on the depth charge, plus arming switches in the cockpit. The former would be armed before closing the bay doors, but the cockpit arming switches would remain off until the time came to drop it. Which would have been long after the aircraft had left the flight deck. I couldn't find the reference given above, so don't know what's there. This is from my experience in actually handling these. (During the time I worked with them they were called "nuclear depth charges".)
The above is POV; Wikipedia is not an "I." 24.93.192.186 (talk) 03:05, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: A 1961 Flight news item about the "Lulu nuclear depth bomb" here:   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.148.220.131 (talk) 14:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted Section
Talk:Konstantinos Karamanlis/Archive 1

message: It is fascinating to note that Karamanlis was "smeared" for allegedly planning a coup by representatives of both sides of the cold war as well as the former King (strange bedfellows!), "smeared" by former Nazis (Merten) for being a collaborator,  "smeared" by representatives of the Greek Left for being a moral accomplice of Lambrakis' murder, "smeared" by the Greek Right for following socialist economic policies in the 1970s,  "smeared" by urban planners for the 'aesthetic' he imposed on the development of Athens, "smeared" by ecologists for burying the River Ilissos, "smeared" for his handling of the Cyprus affair in 1960 (London-Zurich Treaties), even "smeared"by his close associate Aggelos Vlachos for his handling of the Cyprus crisis in 1974 ... and the list of "smear-campaigns" against him goes on and on...Rastapopoulos 11:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am sorry, but I will not return your insults Mr BirdieFluke :) Wont fall for your προβοκάτσια ...Rastapopoulos 13:16, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Check out the term ad hominem attacks. This technique, ever so popular in Greek politcal youth organizations in the 1970s, as well as at the γήπεδο even today, is kitsch and adds no value to your arguments.Rastapopoulos 12:46, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not talking about κώλο and μουνί, but about "insincere Γλυξβουργόφρων"! What makes you think I am insincere? :P Rastapopoulos 13:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

text:  O yes, I have been assigned by ghosts to restore "τον θεσμό της φρίκης και τον γυιό της Φρειδερίκης" Brrrrr...your beloved ethnarch must be churning in his grave :P  Rastapopoulos 13:01, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The most universally "smeared" Greek "Ethnarch"?
Talk:Euskotren Trena

message: Hello. Given the new commercial division of the Euskotren brand, now divided into "Euskotren Trena" (for train services), "Euskotren Tranbia" (for tram services), "Euskotren Autobusa" (bus services) and "Euskotren Kargo" (cargo). I suggest the article to be divided into four new articles, one for each new division while this one (which should be renamed "Euskotren" [right now it's "EuskoTren"]) should be focused on the main company, as it works like a "parent company" for the rest. The Spanish Wikipedia has already made the change: Euskotren Trena, and Euskotren Tranbia. Greetings.--Metroxed (talk) 12:11, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New commercial division 
Talk:Core Animation

message: As this is a new technology, it is likely that this page will soon be recreated rather soon if it is deleted.  Within a week, the article will likely flesh out, and since it's already linked to, I don't see much point in deleting it now.  Wait a couple of days maybe?
: or hours?  It is already filling out. Jake 20:44, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Minutes. This is Wikipedia. ;-) Björn Leander 21:23, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Suzuki GS series

message: Has anybody got a pic of a classic GS? The GS 500 looks completely atypical, with its twin-spar frame.--Cancun771 20:20, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Hi,
in view of the unsystematic way Suzuki handles its model designations, shouldn't the Wikis be renamed? 
Consider this: Currently, there are wikis on the GS, GSX, GSX-R, and Katana series. In Germany (and probably much of the rest of Europe), the Katana moniker designated the famous restyled GS derivatives, while in the US, this name was only accepted after their success - and used for GSX bikes, later even for the cheap GSX-F sport tourers. Which, in other parts of the world, are called "GS" despite their four-valve engines... You see what I'm getting at?--Cancun771 08:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming of Suzuki range wikis?
Talk:Bajrakitiyabha

message: Is it known if she is married or has children? If so, this should be included in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.24.145.52 (talk) 00:21, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: She has a daughter with Paritat Bunnag outside marriage. https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1689594663376136821 ——170.64.192.145 (talk) 01:08, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Family

message: Channelnewsasia.com 8 January 2023 Sudzydoogiedawg (talk) 13:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update health, read: Thai king's daughter remains unconscious weeks after collapsing