Talk:Dublin Port Tunnel

message: The tunnel is quite a short one. Austria alone has 13 road tunnels that are longer. See http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_Tunnel_in_Österreich  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.65.178.206 (talk) 22:05, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tunnel length

message: It is being reported in a number of places including here that the tunnel will open in late October/early November.  While the city council has not given a final date, the tunnel website has had a significant makeover in the last couple of days.  Nelson50 09:02, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Finally opening?

message: Hi all, my office looks over the dublin port end of this tunnel, I work in East Point Business Park. Any picture requests for this article, let me know on my talk page. Smitz 20:45, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture Reqeusts

message: The Tunnel specs have been converted wrong,I'd change but then some people change it back.  Either I feel, the imperial should be removed or corrected.  Below I made typed the correct figures, based on the 25.4 mm inch / 0.9144 metre yard
Tunnel specifications
Interior of the port tunnel
Interior of the port tunnel
    * Length: 4.5 km (2.8 miles) - total project 5.6 km (3.5 miles)
    * Bores: 2
    * Bore width: 11.77 m (38.62 ft)
    * Lane width (two per bore): 3.65 m (11.97 ft)
    * Shoulder width (two per bore): 1 m (3.28 ft)
    * Bore height: 4.9 m (16.07 ft)
    * Operating height: 4.65 m (15.25 ft)
    * Lowest point: -30 m (-98.43 ft) at Marino  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Limbo-Messiah (talk • contribs) 16:13, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was probably auto-converted, and the auto converter does some very strange and nonsensical things depending on the accuracy of the input. I've complained blue in the face about it on bugzilla but thems what hold the reins don't seem to think it's a problem, even though it will happily e.g. convert 110km to "70 miles" and 100km to "60"... Best to just work it out by hand if you know the factors. 193.63.174.211 (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Conversions to Imperial/US Units 

message: I've upgraded the status of the article within WikiProject Ireland to Mid, given the project's importance as a major piece of infrastructure in both Ireland and Europe. As the second-longest urban tunnel on the continent it's highly likely people from outside Ireland will be researching it.
Personally though I feel these importance ratings take from the articles - they demean the lesser ones as substandard when in fact the information might all be present, just not referenced or badly presented. Ste01 (talk) 15:32, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance

message: I'm going to "be bold" and straight-up delete that small section, as it is arguably patent nonsense, and both of the cite links are dead (one either out of date or typo'd, the other completely blank) meaning there's no evidence this isn't completely made up.
In any case, any point that may have been made by the RHA spokesman (should he exist and this not be the wibblings of some other madman) is pretty null - a cursory checkover of the road itself (e.g. using google streetview) or its plans and policies show that the northbound exit forms the outer two lanes of the M1/M50 approach, with a connecting lane from the N1 to M50 making up the leftmost lane of the three. Throughout that whole section, a kilometre or so long, the lanes are marked as M50 ¦ M1 ¦ M1. Even if it was a 120km/h limit, and trucks were banned from the outer lane of 2-lane sections (which the second "M1" marked lane effectively counts as), they would still be allowed to use the middle one. Which is the same lane as the only one they are allowed to be in through the whole of the tunnel, as overtaking by HGVs is banned outright on that section.
There is no problem here at all, and almost certainly never was unless the layout either used to be, or now is drastically different. The only drivers who would have to "immediately cross two lanes" are those in sub-3-tonne vehicles, headed for the M50, who somehow don't realise they need to diverge left for the first 900 metres...
(I have no personal interest here - I just came across the tunnel at random, sat in a different country, whilst looking at a map of Dublin for a different reason) 193.63.174.211 (talk) 12:42, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The links used to work and there is indeed an RHA spokesman.  I think the (genuine) controversy may have resulted in another case of "an Irish solution to an Irish problem" - with the result being that the leftmost lane was designated as being the M50 rather than the M1, making it legal for HGVs to stay in the "middle" lane.  The lack of a current, ongoing controvery and lack of crashes, though, means it's probably fine to delete the section. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:42, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exit positioning controversy 

message: The article states that the project didn't run over budget- I have sincere doubts about this:
The Dublin City Council audit of 2010 put the cost at €804 million. see here:
http://www.environ.ie/en/Publications/LocalGovernment/AuditService/2010AuditorsReports/FileDownLoad,29304,en.pdf
The Minister for Transport, Seamus Brennan said in the Dáil in 2003 that "The original all-in price of the finally settled on project, after all the issues to do with different size bores were considered, was €533 million."
 http://debates.oireachtas.ie/dail/2003/03/11/00009.asp
That seems like a large over-run to me...
89.101.207.244 (talk) 16:28, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Over Budget?'''

message: According to their website, it is now the "Dublin Tunnel" not "Dublin Port Tunnel". Should this page be renamed? Although it is no longer officially the Dublin Port Tunnel, it is still known by that name by most peopleRoyboymaps (talk) 22:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Still named Dublin Port Tunnel by the NRA: http://www.nra.ie/RoadSchemeActivity/DublinCityCouncil/M50DublinPortTunnel/SchemeName,16534,en.html  It's funny though, does that mean there will never be another tunnel in Dublin?  I wouldn't support renaming just yet, but do not feel strongly about it either way.  Well spotted BTW.  Nelson50T 20:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tunnel Renamed 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.roadtraffic-technology.com/projects/dublin_sea/
*:Triggered by \broadtraffic-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dublin Port Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061005075404/http://www.sustainabledevelopments.ie/content/category/22/building?id_content=902&Dublin+Port+Tunnel+to+top+1+billion+euro to http://www.sustainabledevelopments.ie/content/category/22/building?id_content=902&Dublin+Port+Tunnel+to+top+1+billion+euro
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061024120656/http://www.newheartfordublin.ie:80/ to http://www.newheartfordublin.ie
*Added  tag to http://www.rte.ie/news/2008/0228/primetime.html
*Added  tag to http://www.rte.ie/news/2008/0304/primetime.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150528182525/http://www.internationaltransportforum.org:80/IntOrg/road/pdf/dimensions.pdf to http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/IntOrg/road/pdf/dimensions.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040820130233/http://www.rte.ie:80/news/2004/0818/6news/6news56_2a.smil to http://www.rte.ie/news/2004/0818/6news/6news56_2a.smil
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040808203338/http://www.nishimatsu.co.jp:80/eng/project/dublin.htm to http://www.nishimatsu.co.jp/eng/project/dublin.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.egisprojects.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Dublin Port Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sustainabledevelopments.ie/content/category/22/building?id_content=902&Dublin%20Port%20Tunnel%20to%20top%201%20billion%20euro
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.newheartfordublin.ie/
*Added  tag to http://www.rte.ie/news/2008/0228/primetime.html
*Added  tag to http://www.rte.ie/news/2008/0304/primetime.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150528182525/http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/IntOrg/road/pdf/dimensions.pdf to http://www.internationaltransportforum.org/IntOrg/road/pdf/dimensions.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rte.ie/news/2004/0818/6news/6news56_2a.smil
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nishimatsu.co.jp/eng/project/dublin.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dublin Port Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070513062638/http://www.nra.ie/RoadSchemeActivity/SchemeActivity-2006/ to http://www.nra.ie/RoadSchemeActivity/SchemeActivity-2006/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061103035749/http://www.dublinporttunnel.ie/route_and_location_maps/national_road_network_map/ to http://www.dublinporttunnel.ie/route_and_location_maps/national_road_network_map/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Dublin Port Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100131002954/http://dublinporttunnel.ie/tolls_and_permitted_vehicles/ to http://www.dublinporttunnel.ie/tolls_and_permitted_vehicles/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:22, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I went through it on a bus and we never seemed to go down (or up). Is it actually an ordinary road with a roof (cf. Dublin's two trams which don't meet.)?
https://www.theaa.ie/blog/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Dublin-Port-Tunnel-600x400.jpg
:Yes it is a tunnel. Read the article :-)  — Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 17:36, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: is it really a tunnel?