Talk:SQL

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on SQL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110628130925/http://iablog.sybase.com/paulley/2008/07/sql2008-now-an-approved-iso-international-standard/ to http://iablog.sybase.com/paulley/2008/07/sql2008-now-an-approved-iso-international-standard/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140706215458/http://www.sqlstream.com/stream-processing-with-sql/ to http://www.sqlstream.com/stream-processing-with-sql/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The link to data query language redirects to Query_language that is very general and very vague about SQL. The links for DCL, DDL and DML try to be a combination of a relevant language in general and SQL specifically, but perhaps that is relevant to each of those other pages. Sam Tomato (talk) 02:03, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  DQL, DCL, DDL and DML 

message: Curious to know whether HiveQL or the language similar to SQL but used in a Hadoop cluster environment and used via Hive interface can be considered as a type of SQL? --TheHiveBeeline (talk) 21:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  HiveQL or HQL be considered as SQL ? 

message: I've added a source confirming that Donald D. Chamberlin intended SQL to stand for "Structured Query Language." Some people say it doesn't stand for anything; hopefully this will put that claim to rest. Qzekrom (she/her • talk) 16:56, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  SQL does stand for Structured Query Language 

message: I do not think my description of Distributed SQL database architecture should be merged into this article despite the tag. If I were to create the term I would have called them Distributed Relational. While they do execute SQL in a distributed manner, the means it which they (Spanner, Cockroach, et al) achieve consistency and how they store data is more interesting than that they support SQL the language. In my opinion User:CommanderWaterford's addition of a merge tag seems to be a reaction to the name of the technology rather than the contents of the article. Reboot (talk) 19:58, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , this doesn't appear to be gaining any traction. I've removed the tag from the Distributed SQL article, which I think was added in error before you finished writing the article. I see has since been reviewed as part of the NPP process, so I think we can draw a line under this now. Best GirthSummit (blether) 18:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distributed SQL vs SQL 

message: # As of spring 2023 this part is only a working draft, hence not part of the standard.
# The author says that JSON is introduced as a new data type - in opposition to 'JSON as a character string'. Unfortunatelly I don't have access to the working draft. Can the author publish a link to it?
# Please explain the stated correlation between 'Property Graph Queries' on the one hand and 'data type JSON' on the other hand.
# The text 'SQL/MDA' seems to be a copy/past error?
Kelti (talk) 07:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  9075-16:2023 Part 16 - SQL/PGQ 

message: What needs cleared up by the tag you placed? -  AquilaFasciata (talk | contribs) 16:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don’t understand what “often… for historical reasons” means Zanahary (talk) 17:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it was historically called sequel? What do you interpret it as? -  AquilaFasciata (talk | contribs) 17:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I interpreted it to mean that it is presently referred to as sequel only in the context of historical discussion. Does it mean that it used to be called sequel but is no longer? Zanahary (talk) 21:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh, gotcha; the latter example is correct but I can see the confusion. -  AquilaFasciata (talk | contribs) 14:28, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  SQL pronunciation clarification tag