Talk:Sherwood Foresters

message: During WW2 the 14th Battalion Sherwood Foresters were stationed in Egypt, Palestine, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq. Palmiped 13:07, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First comment

message: :Image:SF ColourRegiment.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:SF ColourRegiment.JPG

message: This piece is written in a very curious, mock Victorian tone. Could somebody who has some time possibly re-write it into something more scholarly and less, well, gushing?
220.233.178.130 (talk) 14:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unscholarly and curious tone of this piece.  

message: It looks as if this page has been lifted verbatim from the History of the Sherwood Foresters website, so unless that one is copied from here, this whole page will have to go. Does anyone know the provenance of the content here? Xyl 54 (talk) 02:18, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: , 2007. No other contribs from the user - it does indeed look like a clear lift, since that site's last dated 2001. Shimgray | talk | 11:22, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What happens now? Is there a time limit to sort this out? Or a template or something? (I seem to remember). Should it be deleted and replaced with a re-written article? or even a stub, for now. We've got articles on the 45th and 95th already, so they need a summary here and a main article link, and text here for the regiments history from 1881 to the present; or to 1970 anyway.. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:46, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

text: PS Found it! Xyl 54 (talk) 23:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 

message: See 95th (Derbyshire) Regiment of Foot. Sources seem to be at variance.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.85.148.202 (talk • contribs) 10:28, 14 April 2011
:You're right...I've fixed it. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:44, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1755 or 1823? 

message: Although regiments.org lists 33 battalions as taking part in WW1, only 25 of these were raised during the war - 8 Btns (regular, militia and TF) were in existence several years before war commenced!
Similarly, at least 6 Btns (1st - 5th and 8th) existed prior to the start of WW2. The 7th btn had converted to an RE searchlight unit in 1938, the same might have happened with the 6th btn.  The order to duplicate the TA was issued on 31 March 1939 and the majority of TA units seem to have managed this duplication before September. I'm not sure if this was the case for 2/5th and 2/8th Btns (although the latter was seemingly re-designated as the 9th btn at some time during 1939).Glevum (talk) 01:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battalions raised

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Sherwood Foresters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/045SherF.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080110025226/http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/laa/page143.html to http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/laa/page143.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304041131/http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/home/page49.html to http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/home/page49.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090319184727/http://freespace.virgin.net/stephen.mee/index.htm to http://freespace.virgin.net/stephen.mee/index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090322060614/http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/index.html to http://www.ra39-45.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified