lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Philippine International Jazz & Ethnic Arts Festival Artists

message: I moved this page here from its old name, which was essentially just a list of a few of the artists.  I also reformatted it to make it easier to read, and subsequently removed the cleanup tag.  However, I think this info probably just belongs in the Philippine International Jazz & Ethnic Arts Festival article.  Any opinions?CharacterZero 07:17, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article really needs cleaning up. It looks like a list of performers, but has no information about the festival and about its notability. I'm restoring the tag. --- Tito Pao 03:25, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Lets just merge this list, the list per se isn't that notable. --Howard the Duck 10:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Karin (Dragon Ball)

message: "He is an albino cat who... "
He's albino? I thought he was just white? Was there any reference ever to him being albino? -- DesireCampbell 22:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Meaning that he's white, it's just another word for it. Power level (Dragon Ball) 18:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Albinism is not just another word for white. --Veesicle (Talk) 20:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think I'll change that... (Me | The Article) 20:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albino
Talk:MediaTransparency

message: WHy is there a fear of putting labels on organizations in an encyclopedia?  MediaTransparency is a liberal organization.  IT is often cited as such in the mainstream press.  It's not controversial to call the them liberal.  It is simply a fact.--Tbeatty 07:24, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless they describe themselves as such (which I could not find on their about pages), I am reluctant to ascribe labels to any organization. Gamaliel 07:33, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I included it from their Kudos page.  They CAN'T describe themselves that way or they wouldn't be 501(c)3.  But they let others do it and they hihglight the description as who they are. The press ascribe labels when it clarifies a position.  It is not a POV violation to use labels to describe organizaiton that have a POV.  --Tbeatty 07:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Since they seem to have endorsed the WRI quote, I have no problem with describing them as such now.  I am still against using press labels in most cases because their labels are not always accurate or NPOV. Gamaliel 07:50, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Advocacy groups are inherently POV.  It is not accurate to let advocacy groups be presented as NPOV groups. --Tbeatty 17:30, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but we must insure that the labels we ascribe to them are accurate and NPOV to avoid the sort of POV "radical left" attribution you attempted to ascribe to the UCS in the George Bush article. Gamaliel 20:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  label 
Talk:List of Ergo Proxy episodes

message: This page should be deleted, since it is encapsulated in the original Ergo Proxy page.  Any other opinions?Bwabes 07:24, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've split the list from the main article, as it will soon contain episode descriptions for 23 episodes, and will easily support itself as it's own article. -- Ned Scott 01:48, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've typed up short summaries for the list since it was only done up to episode 4~ But I'm not too sure about the one for episode 23, it got a little too confusing for me. I'm also wondering if this page is supposed to have full-lenght reviews or just (mostly spoiler free) synopsises? ARENCOR 09:46, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Short- to mid-length summaries are fine.  Don't worry about spoilers; if necessary, just slap a :Template:Spoiler on the top.  —TangentCube /c /t  18:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since someone (a suspiciously new account...) has listed this article as a copyright problem, I've taken the liberty of creating a 'temp' page with the summaries and images removed, per the AfD discussion. —TangentCube /c /t  23:07, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Both. —TangentCube, Dialogues 09:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:CP listing 

message: I don't know where we currently stand on this issue (I don't see the copyvio tag anywhere?) but as I feel the current summaries are too short and don't really contribute much information, I will rewrite and lengthen them (I'm watching the series so I might as well). I'll start by posting the summaries for episode 7 on but I'll return to add 1 through 6 as I go along. Juniper4589 (talk) 14:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Summaries 
Talk:Natalia Pushkina

message: We could use some references for this page. Shawnc 10:42, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Данные о "замечательной карьере" Ланского после брака со вдовой Пушкина сильно преувеличены: Ланской был генералом и командиром лейб-гвардии Конного полка ещё до знакомства с Натальей Николаевной и никаких данных об «особом карьерном росте» после брака с ней нет. О том же, что Пушкина была любовницей Николая I нет ни одного достоверного свидетельства ни в русских, ни, что ещё более важно, в зарубежных источниках того времени. С уважением, участник ру-вики Юлия_70--95.72.63.32 (talk) 08:44, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made a remarkable career ... 

message: What is meant by "in the court to settle them"?  --Wikiain (talk) 02:44, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chaperon
Talk:Washington Hebrew Congregation

message: I notice that the article contains several sections which appear to be written as if they belong on the synagogue's website.  For instance, the passage which states that a rabbi infused the congregation with creativity. I did a little Googling and... here it is: https://www.whctemple.org/about/history/senior-rabbis/ 73.250.255.143 (talk) 16:31, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone
Talk:P. Roy Vagelos

message: I had to cut some nonencyclopedic and certainly nonverifable sentences.  A slow learner, he was more interested in playing the violin or cutting up with his classmates.  Really?  Is there an editor out there who knows what his inner thoughts were 50 years ago?  At best, if this is mentioned in a bio or auto-bio, when this could be reinserted with the caveat "As described in his biography, when Vagelos was a student ... etc." --Deville (Talk) 07:38, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Australia at the 2002 Commonwealth Games

message: Rather than having pages like this, wouldn't it be better to have a page for Australia at the Commonwealth Games and cover the full history there ?  -- Beardo 07:52, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Gad Guard

message: The reasoning for the Messerschmitt is Twofold.  
The first, is that She does call it as such when she formally introduces herself in an earlier episode.  
Secondly, it also holds to the theme of the Techodes being named after WWII fighters, namely, the P-38 Lightning, A6M Zero, P-47 Thunderbolt, and Nakajima Ki-84 "Hayate". 
And of course, the Messerschmitt Bf 109 (Or the Messerschmitt Bf 110)  SAMAS 21:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, lessee.
1. I don't call her "Aiko Mary Harmony" in the summary; after introducing her, I just call her Aiko.  It's not necessary to write out the character's full name more than a few times.  Since in the show, the Techode is usually just called Messah, I consider this to be the normal form of its name, and 'Messah Schmidt' to be the full form of its name.  This was my logic in reverting a while back...was I wrong?
2. The official romanisation on the R1 DVDs is Messah Schmidt, and since the policy is usually to use the most common name (unfortunately, rather than the one that fits the neat little theme), that's what I think we should use.  Granted, 'Messah' might be a wee error on the part of Geneon, but if that's the most well-known name, that can't really be helped.
Granted, verification might be difficult if there was a WWII fighter that had the same name (that'd make Google searches pretty hard).  When I have the time, I'll hunt around for fansites and see which name they use.  
I promise that if most fansites use Messerschmidt, I'll change each instance of the name without further complaint, so don't worry.
I honestly appreciate the fact that you're trying to intelligently and politely prove your point instead of just shouting at me, by the way.  Thanks a lot.  ^_^--Tally Solleni 16:38, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Messerschmitt 

message: I have removed the "On the Series" section of this article.  While quite well-written, it was essentially a review of the series and was entirely subjective, and as such is not appropriate for a Wikipedia article.
206.176.160.169 16:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "On The Series" 

message: Mania.com DVD box set 2009 Ed --KrebMarkt (talk) 20:04, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s)
Talk:Kulen

message: You don't usually hear of foods as "durable," so I changed it to "edible," only to realize that now "edible" is in the sentence twice, which seems a bit wrong. Maybe someone else can make it better?
In order to resove dilema, I replaced first "edible" with "shelf-stable". I agree that "durable" is not suitable word refering to food, "shelf-stable" or "stable" would be more appropriate. 
Suggestion:"Kulen matures during following winter, when can be eaten (although not fully dried and cured yet with very hot taste)but full taste characteristics reaches in the following summer. Kulen is a shelf-stable meat product, sustaining shelf life up to two years when kept at refrigeration (or even room) temperatures."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.80.150.77 (talk) 23:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Durable

message: This is a very interesting subject.  But it reads like one person's thoughts.  How do we know, for example that the large intestine is selected for Kulen because it is bigger?  Yes, obviously a sausage made from large intestine will be of greater girth than one made from the small intestine, but is that why it is used?  And the article says: it has not yet become a major product due to the lengthy and somewhat complicated production process. Without a source, that looks like OR to me. 98.82.22.154 (talk) 16:14, 31 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Just thrown out that last bit and rewrote the paragraph using sources. GregorB (talk) 13:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Most likely that is common knowledge among those who makes it and thus wasn't regarded as in need of sources. 78.70.77.75 (talk) 15:07, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources and informality and OR
Talk:NetPositive

message: The article on the Haiku OS mentions that Net+ is famous for it's haiku-style error messages, but this article doesn't mention it at all. Is it true? --maru   (talk)  contribs 08:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Its true. All error messages are in the form of Haiku, although its optionally disable-able for some rather strange reason to do with being more "serious" for businesses, even though the OS still has "Bummer" on alert boxes and similar... --Kiand 15:42, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haiku messages 
Talk:Beenleigh railway station

message: Hardly accurate to call it he terminus of the Beenleigh line, when the Gold Coast line runs over exactly the same route and rails o that point.
Alex Law 08:10, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminus

message: The first Beenleigh station was located behind the tunnels which was a big round-a-bout and had stabling equipment the original station closed in 1987 as part of the new from Holmview station to the Beenleigh station. In preperation for Expo '88 and opened in March 1988  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TravellerAus (talk • contribs) 01:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, I'm guessing you meant to add this to the actual content of the page? This is the talk page, and is not displayed on the actual article. TravellerQLD (talk | contribs) 13:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Station
Category talk:Environmental books

message: The articles that are in this category are not easily classified as fiction or non-fiction. Alan Liefting 08:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I suggest create environmental magazine category.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.159.136.216 (talk) 12:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magazines
Talk:Santalum spicatum

message: I rated it high because of the use of this plant from the ancient to present. Various uses are listed on page and at Sandalwood.  Fred 05:02, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mid at best on the scale of all things? --Steve  (Stephen)  talk  05:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance 
Talk:Big Cypress National Preserve

message: I'd like to see more about the history of the forest. I believe that the majority of the cypress trees were clear cut by lumber companies in the late 1950's.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by M23 (talk • contribs) 00:56, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History of the forest

message: I removed the trivia section and the associated comment: To celebrate the 2000 millennium, the American rock band Phish hosted an enormous festival called "Big Cypress" on the nearby Big Cypress Seminole Indian Reservation. I don't think this really needed to be mentioned in the Big Cypress article as it didn't actually occur in the Preserve. The festival is mentioned on the Big Cypress Indian Reservation. I think that's suffiicent, If you believe otherwise, contact me. --Nebular110 16:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia section removed

message: The only thing I see references for in this article is the controversy over use of off-road vehicles. I do see some statements in the article that I think are questionable. I'll work on it when I can, but I will take out statements for which I don't find sources. -- Donald Albury 17:09, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References needed 

message: I think Mostly Harmless (hiker) deserves a mention somewhere on the page. Thriley (talk) 23:54, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Mostly Harmless the hiker
Talk:Big Thicket

message: Hello  I had some questions about your recent edits:
*I had changed the plural of units to lower case such as "Hardin, Tyler, western Jasper and southeast Polk counties" rather than "Counties". My understanding is that when talking about plurals of proper names, that the descriptor is lower case. E.g. "The Missouri and Mississippi rivers", not "Rivers". That being said, I don't feel strongly about it and if we want to go with upper case, I'll go through and make it consistently capped if you'd prefer.
*You'd changed some "–" (en dashes) to "-" (hyphen-minuses). I'd chosen the en dashes based on MOS:DATERANGE. Does that make sense to you?
*Why capitalize Baygall?
Thanks, SchreiberBike | ⌨  23:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy editing questions
Talk:Little River Canyon National Preserve

message: Canyon Mouth Park, the camping area referred to at the end of the article was indeed damaged by floods, but it has not been abandoned.  The NPS has fixed it up, but camping is not allowed, and there is no intention to allow camping when last I checked with the park about 6 months ago.  I'm not interested in editing wiki pages, but I'll answer questions by those who might at my email addy (sharon_rogers@bellsouth.net)  It was a great campsite back in the 80's, but we only used it for big groups.  When camping with my father, we would hike into the canyon, up past the Eberhardt point trail and camp over night, then continue up to the falls, where my uncle would pick us up a couple of days later.  This isn't allowed anymore by the park service, but I have been sorely tempted to do it solo with a low profile regardless, just for nostalgia's sake.68.219.175.115 20:18, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 comments
Talk:Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve

message: Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 18:34, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 

message: Much of the text on this page was lifted verbatim from the official website: http://www.nps.gov/archive/tapr/home.htm Spottacus 12:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarized

message: Going to the park and researching it online, it becomes clear that the Tallgrass Prairie National Preserve is cooperatively run by both the National Park Service and the Nature Conservancy. In fact, a majority of the land is owned by the Nature Conservancy. Thus, under "governing body" I included the Nature Conservancy following the National Park Service. Bentendo24 (talk) 15:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Nature Conservancy
Talk:Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move page. (non-admin closure)  — YoungForever(talk)  05:58, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Timucuan Preserve →  – The proposed page name was the previous title for this page, but someone boldly moved it to its current title over redirect in 2014, ostensibly per WP:COMMONNAME. However, the lead and infobox maintain the full name, and all other pages for National Park Service sites are located at pages with their full official names per their official NPS websites. A Google search under the current name returns the complete name in Google maps and the top hit is the NPS website with the complete name. This page should be moved back to its complete name, with the current name remaining as a redirect. Mdewman6 (talk) 05:13, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 August 2020
Talk:Dayton Aviation Heritage National Historical Park

message: I think we should consider having this article *not* be a museum and instead have separate breakout articles for each of the locations which *are* museums with cats.  Thoughts dm (talk) 04:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum cats 
Talk:George Rogers Clark National Historical Park

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub.  --dashiellx (talk) 13:33, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Somehow, the first reference to sculptor Hermon Atkins MacNeil seems to have disappeared. I presume that was a mishap when the image was added, as it would have come just below that. Miss Ivonne (talk) 13:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing First Reference 

message: from the Marietta Mural section.  The use of the words "our history" alone are probably enough, but the suggestion that this document ranks, "second only to the Constitution of the United States." really needs to be (opinion) referenced.   
::"The Northwest Ordinance July 13, 1787, in which this invention was embodied, also consecrated the region to freedom both of conscience and of labor. It provided the model for all subsequent territories. As a political document, it ranks in our history second only to the Constitution of the United States."  
Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:14, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just cut this out 

message: This article is an older GA, but is not up to the modern GA criteria. Material about the history of the monument after its construction (for instance, management between construction and NPS management, or details of NPS management) are not included, the purpose and significance section is uncited, and not all material is supported by the existing citations. For instance, I'm not seeing where the count of paving stones in "removal, temporary storage, and numbering of approximately 1,000 large granite paving stones" is found in the source, or the reference to the sprinkler system later in the paragraph. If these issues are not addressed, the article may need to go to good article reassessment. Hog Farm  Talk 15:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Even a quick reading of the lede demonstrates a more casual style than what we should expect in a modern GA. There's no question it's a GA-worthy subject. I see it's been listed for reassessment. BusterD (talk) 14:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA status concerns
Talk:Kaloko-Honokōhau National Historical Park

message: I object. Both the official National Park web site and the signs at the park are spelled with a disacrtical mark: Honokōhau. I understand the technical reason why the article titles should avoid them, but what exactly breaks when they are used as text in the article? Please clarify, thanks. W Nowicki (talk) 03:09, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usual diacritic question 
Talk:Lowell National Historical Park

message: I am startled by the reference to canals from the Merrimac to the Charles River.  Can someone provide a reference?  I should think I would have heard of that before, but I have not.  That would have been a long canal.  Are there any vestiges of it remaining today? Davidb0229 16:19, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion 

message: A ranger removed "oldest national historical park" as false.  I did a little more research because this is an often repeated claim in Lowell, and the ranger is correct:  George_Rogers_Clark_National_Historical_Park for example is older.  Is there a superlative for Lowell, and if so, what is it exactly?  Thanks, CSZero (talk) 15:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest Park? 

message: * Lowell National Historical Park: A Story of an Industrial Park (1992)
* The Lowell experiment : Public History in a Postindustrial city (2006)
* Mill Power: The Origin and Impact of Lowell National Historical Park (2014)
NegMawon (talk) 15:52, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Book Resources for more Info
Talk:Morristown National Historical Park

message: This would not be the proper place to discuss the hard winter of 1779-1780. But there currently is no higher level article, except the Revolutionary War itself, which not only fails to mention it, but in which there is no room (article organization) where it might be inserted. Student7 (talk) 23:29, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History problem
Talk:Puʻuhonua o Hōnaunau National Historical Park

message: Can anybody tell me who Hale O Keawe was builded for Keaweikekahialiiokamoku aka. Keawe II or Keawenuiaumi aka. Keawe I?  I checked Google Books and it seems that it was the second Keawe not the first one.  This would place the construction in the 17th century not the 16th. --KAVEBEAR (talk) 10:05, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hale O Keawe 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support
Bringing the article title into line with the National Parks policy makes obvious sense. Also, to use the 'okina but not the kahakō is inconsistent, and both are needed since they are full phonemes which determine the pronunciation and meaning of Hawaiian terms. Awien (talk) 00:04, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey