Talk:Daedelus (musician)

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Daedelus (musician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120510053222/http://stylusmagazine.com/reviews/adventure-time/dreams-of-water-themes.htm to http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/adventure-time/dreams-of-water-themes.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130629053257/http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/daedelus/a-gent-agent.htm to http://www.stylusmagazine.com/reviews/daedelus/a-gent-agent.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Daedelus (musician) →  – Ambigous, there is no other item named Daedelus (though a lot of things titled Daedalus) on Wikipedia, but for some reason the only topic is disambiguated while the abigous term redirects to a disambiguation page of another spelling. Hatnote at Daedelus (musician) would fit better. Lordtobi (✉) 09:53, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
=== Revert ===
This wasn't a good move and it appears to have missed the 2012 consensus above, which explains that "Daedelus" (with the "e") is a common alternative spelling for "Daedalus" (with the "a"), the far more more popular target for the spelling. This is easily confirmed in a Google Books search. That is why the musician was titled at Daedelus (musician) even though the undisambiguated name was a redirect: The primary topic for the undisambiguated name is the mythological figure, not the musician. (The musician is also ostensibly named after the mythological figure.) And at the very least, the RM should have had a full listing, where others would have undoubtedly made the same points as the 2012 consensus...  czar 18:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  If Tobi doesn't contest, then the RM is a moot point and the revert would be fine. And if otherwise, no need to move it again before another RM czar 21:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  The logic behind the revert request seems accurate to me; I hadn't seen the original discussion since I proposed via technical request, so if it is considered to better fit this way, I'm fine with that. Lordtobi (✉) 15:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  , revert sounds good czar 09:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:   (not watching, please ) czar 15:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 May 2017 

message: This wasn't a good move and it appears to have missed the 2012 consensus above, which explains that "Daedelus" (with the "e") is a common alternative spelling for "Daedalus" (with the "a"), the far more more popular target for the spelling. This is easily confirmed in a Google Books search. That is why the musician was titled at Daedelus (musician) even though the undisambiguated name was a redirect: The primary topic for the undisambiguated name is the mythological figure, not the musician. (The musician is also ostensibly named after the mythological figure.) And at the very least, the RM should have had a full listing, where others would have undoubtedly made the same points as the 2012 consensus...  czar 18:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  If Tobi doesn't contest, then the RM is a moot point and the revert would be fine. And if otherwise, no need to move it again before another RM czar 21:12, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  The logic behind the revert request seems accurate to me; I hadn't seen the original discussion since I proposed via technical request, so if it is considered to better fit this way, I'm fine with that. Lordtobi (✉) 15:25, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  , revert sounds good czar 09:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:   (not watching, please ) czar 15:48, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 

message: Daedelus' releases are very numbered, and the main article is essentially a discography page. I propose moving the complete list of works to Daedelus discography and only keeping their studio albums and major releases on the main article. OptikalCrow (talk) 16:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creation of separate discography article