lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Snake's Revenge

message: Kojima has also stated that he enjoys Snake's Revenge and thought it was faithful to the "Metal Gear concept" he had initially envisioned.
Any sources for that? --Nick R 21:52, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm thinking the proper term for the non-canonical extensions of a series are referred to as AUs [alternate universes] and not parallel.  If there are no objections within a week (please go to my talk page and let me know), I'm changing it.  --Thorns Among Our Leaves 02:33, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parallel vs. Alternate 

message: I know there was at least one other false instruction manual for the game worth mentioning (in which the villain is former shepherd Colonel Cataffy, I have it, but otherwise would be unable to cite a source.  Any thoughts on the subject? 68.75.187.79 05:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is actually from the first game and is already lited in that article. --67.71.76.195 02:46, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instruction Manual 

message: Hey um, did anybody know that Snake's design on the box art is once again based on Michael Biehn, only this time, his character Hicks from the Aliens movie? --FlapjackStantz (talk) 15:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box Art 

message: I see the usual idiots are about making a big deal about canon on a wiki about the actual game.  What purpose does that serve?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.145.74.187 (talk) 13:43, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Canon
Talk:Rinderkennzeichnungs- und Rindfleischetikettierungsüberwachungsaufgabenübertragungsgesetz

message: --46.115.167.243 (talk) 20:44, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

message: Perhaps this page should be merged with "Donaudampfschiffahrtselektrizitätenhauptbetriebswerkbauunterbeamtengesellschaft" to create a "German compound words" article. - Phi*n!x 22:14, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the subjects are obviously distinct. Gerrit CUTEDH 16:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course the subjects are distinct, but the content of the articles is not- both discuss German compound words.  I would be fine with keeping the articles separate if they actually discussed the things the words refer to, not the words themselves.  There doesn't seem to be much information on this; even the German versions of these articles discuss grammar. We could possibly leave the first and third paragraphs as a stub, since they actually somewhat discuss the topic. Phi*n!x 16:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

text: The article is not about compund words, but about a law that happens to use a compound word (and, admittedly, got better-known for it's compund-word-ness). Still, this is as much an article about humour in the German Parliament than about compund words, and we're not going to merge it with Jakob Maria Mierscheid just because of that, either. Enno 18:43, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: This word does not complement Jahrtausend. It is simply an alternative word from another Indo-European language with the same meaning.Pamour (talk) 14:13, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Millenium
Talk:Shift JIS art

message: This is ASCII art.
:I'm seeing characters there that do not belong to the ASCII set.--Kaonashi 01:45, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Shift JIS is the character encoding used for this images. The title is set the same way as the ASCII art article.
I live in Japan and often see 2ch, but I never saw the word of "Shift JIS art" too. I think this article sould be renamed. --Lonchi**-en 07:35, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: The Art Image uploaded to this article.
*Why Old artcle deleted? -基 建吉(MOTOI Kenkichi) (talk) 15:47, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Test of images uploaded, 

message: Someone created a portrait of Stalin. The Japanese ASCII art article has one. Isn't he a notable example of this art? 
I too think this article should be renamed or merged with ASCII art.--Shinkansen Fan (talk) 01:53, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Stalin?
Talk:Broadway & 52nd

message: Hey! I just finished writin the article!
i'm removing the speedy-delete!
Project2501a 22:19, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Haya language

message: "spoken by the people of Tanzania, west and northwest of Lake Victoria"
:Land northwest of Lake Victoria is in Uganda, not Tanzania. Is the language also spoken in Uganda, or is 'northwest' an error? - MPF 22:21, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: " It is one of the languages in Star Wars." Pardon?! JackyR 22:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This was probably meant (it is on the referenced page): In Return of the Jedi, the voice of Lando Calrissian's copilot, Nien Nunb, was provided by a student speaking Haya, a language from the young man's native Tanzania (Star Wars Insider #67, 31). I feel unable to decide if it is worth mentioning or not.Drabek (talk) 16:57, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  star wars 

message: The Haya reside in Kagera, actually west of Lake Victoria.  I also find it highly unlikely that a Kenyan would speak Kihaya/Ruhaya/Luhaya unless he has Tanzanian parents.  Can anyone find an audio clip of this statement?  Kipsang Rotich is definitely NOT a Haya name.
: Kipsang Rotich is definitely a Kalenjin name; the Kalenjin language is not even distantly related to Haya.  I'm going to delete the trivia section. --72.196.115.66 (talk) 21:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: sorry, didn't mean to be anonymous --Buddhagazelle (talk) 21:53, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  actually west 
Talk:Eric Donaldson

message: I moved a new contribution to Eric Donaldson (sculptor) Triwbe 18:28, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eric Donaldson (sculptor) 

message: I think that this man has a lot under his belt but little is written about him. Unfortunately I cannot write wikipedia type articles yet. But these are some interviews about him that could be added to Eric Donaldson's biography; http://liveanddirect.fr/INTERVIEWS/20130131-ERIC%20DONALDSON/20130131-ERIC%20DONALDSON.html and http://www.ghanacelebrities.com/2014/02/01/ganja-legalized-jamaican-reggae-star-eric-donaldson-says-etv/. Fans of Eric Donaldson, please let us wriet his story. Thank you all, Jah! Blessings  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.66.208.85 (talk) 13:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  EricDonaldson 

message: Does anyone know if live concert video of Eric from the 1970s was ever recorded? If so, is there a link or a way to see it? 2001:BB6:491E:4A00:81BE:80F:F597:F3EA (talk) 18:55, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concert video?
Talk:Common Era calendar

message: I deleted the Email link for several reasons:
# It simply quotes the other external link already provided.
# An email is not an appropriate source, unless the sender is a recognized authority.
# There is no indication the sender has any authoritative status.
# The link was in footnote format, considered poor style (here) in an external links section.
--Blainster 22:51, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Email link

message: I am redirecting this page to Common Era because the contents are wrong. Any correct information is best presented on Common Era because only the labels for the years are discussed, not any days or months, hence it is not a true calendar.
The cited web page has distorted information. The author, Peter Meyer, has erroneously co-opted the name "Common Era Calendar" for astronomical year numbering: -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, …  But "Common Era" as used by historians does not contain any year zero! Such historians label positive years "CE" and earlier years "BCE", yet Meyer does not even mention either of these labels after his "short answer". Furthermore, historians almost never use negative years, and when they do, they do not include a year 0 between -1 and 1! See, for example, V. Grumel, La Chronologie (1958), page 30. — Joe Kress 01:33, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Eucharistic theologies summarised

message: This page needs some work, clarification, and development.  I've tried to get it started.  KHM03 22:53, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this notice still necessary? If no response is posted, I'll remove it. Carolynparrishfan 13:39, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarifications

message: The attention tag was added by KHM03 on June 6, 2005. This person has done a lot of work to bring this page to where it needs to be. KHM03's superior knowledge of the subject has caused him/her to view this page in a lower respect than it deserves as compared with the standards of other pages on wikipedia. I agree with Carolynparrishfan; I feel it has reached the point where it no longer requires this tag. 
The Methodist section needs to have a concise explanation under "Eucharistic theology:", rather than a long quote.
This article could also benefit from a section under each tradition that states whether that tradition supports open or closed communion and the frequency of observance.
--Victoria h 07:29, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm nost sure I have viewed this page "...in a lower respect than it deserves as compared with the standards of other pages on wikipedia."  But, at any rate, you can remove the tag if you wish.   KHM03 13:45, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ready for tag removal? 

message: There were a few inaccuracies here, which I took the liberty to modify. I am willing to discuss them. This is a helpful article. drboisclair 00:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision of the Lutheran section 

message: Is there a reason behind the bullet point style and presentation?  It seems to me that although an encyclopedia should adopt the most appropriate style for the content in question, there needs to be a clear need and a consensus to vary from the typical style of a Wikipedia article.   However, I ask the question idly, as I am not volunteering to rework it - I would just like to know!  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 14:13, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Presentation

message: I dislike simply removing the work of other editors, but I have found no other way to deal with the anonymous addition of "Traditionally, Communion should not be taken in hand, should be kneeled at, and veils are repectfully worn." This addition is, in any case, probably out of place in an article on Eucharistic theologies; but more important, it is simply inaccurate.  Historical documents suggest that receiving the host directly into the mouth was not the earliest form of receiving communion under the form of bread, so calling it "traditional" is questionable. If veils are worn (by all communicants, male and female?), they should of course be worn respectfully.  If the anonymous editor from Willingboro really wants the addition, and if it can be shown to be relevant to an article on Eucharistic theologies (rather than just Eucharistic practices), perhaps we can together work out an acceptable way of expressing it.  See Who Can Receive Communion? and it better to receive Holy Communion on the hand or on the tongue. Lima 17:43, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Communion in the hand
Talk:Councilman body

message: This page should address the difference between a Councilman body and a Mallory body 69.242.192.43 (talk) 01:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference between Councilman body and a Mallory body

message: Why wouldn't this be a proper stub? Babajobu 22:55, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub class
Talk:Richmond, British Columbia

message: The total visible minority population of the city of Richmond (as of 2016) is 76.3%, with the Chinese at 53%. That makes them the ethnic majority of the city. It's MP is represented by an ethnic Chinese, and so are 2 of their MLA's. Wouldn't an addition of a Mandarin Chinese or Cantonese translation of 'Richmond' better represent that? Translations of cities or places with minorities exists on Wikipedia. However, the Chinese in Richmond are not even the minority, but the majority.
In addition, both Cantonese and Mandarin combined is the mother tongue of 41.95% of the cities population, with English only on 33%. Ineedtostopforgetting (talk) 21:57, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This article isn't written for the people of Richmond, it's written for the readers of Wikipedia, and Richmond's official language is neither Cantonese or Mandarin.  Just because a Canadian city has an ethnic majority does not mean the article needs to be translated into that language.  Should Hawkesbury, Ontario have a French translation?  There are non-English majorities across Canada.  Identifying this in the demographic section of the article should suffice. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:59, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese Language 

message: I think we should put this under the Vancouver 2010 Olympics header. Any thoughts? --Icil34 (talk) 21:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richmond Olympic Experience 

message: Add about francophones 2604:3D08:4C7D:9500:356F:230D:C824:E132 (talk) 00:19, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Francophones
Talk:The Twisted Tales of Felix the Cat

message: More episodes:
http://www.wga.org/uploadedfiles/foreign_levies/t_z_Titles.pdf
http://www.bcdb.com/cartoons/Other_Studios/F/Film_Roman_Productions/The_Twisted_Adventures_of_Felix_the_Cat/more2.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.162.192.254 (talk) 02:21, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Episodes
Talk:Texas Rangers

message: :I've transplanted this discussion about a proposed article move from Talk:Texas Rangers (baseball) --Commander Keane 11:12, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Don't know if anybody monitors this discussion but ...
Though it is not a big deal IMHO Texas Rangers should redirect to Texas Ranger Division instead of being a redirect. Though I agree the baseball team is very well-known it is equally well-known that the team is named after the police unit and the police unit is at least as well-known as the sports team. In the same way that Dallas goes straight to the major city instead of a disambig that includes the TV show I would argue this should not automatically go to a disambig.
--Mcorazao (talk) 19:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: One year later. . . .  :-) I would question whether the police force is as well known as the sports team.  see Wikipedia:Systemic bias.  The average person does not have a college degree, and does not live near texas.  The average person does have access to sports news.  And if one were to look at article views for the sports team  (referenced several years back to take in account the recent spike in traffic due to Rangers current run in the playoffs) and police version , one could see that significantly more people are viewing the sports team over the police force.  I would argue this shows that there is no primary topic for the plural form the term "Texas Rangers" and the disambig page belongs where it is.  Oldag07 (talk) 11:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 
Talk:Croft (Scotland)

message: The title of this page seems to imply that Croft is a place in Scotland.  Should it not be moved to Croft (Scotland) or Croft (farming) which would imply that it's a concept (?) rather than a place? Maccoinnich 00:19, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
I've been bold and merged this article into Croft (land).CarolGray 18:51, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:2005 in science

message: (This comment originally appeared in Talk:List of years in science, but was moved here in order to increase its chance of being discovered and responded to before "too long". If there's a better, more actively visited, talk page for this thread to be responded to by sufficiently many contributors, please feel free to take appropriate action to get it moved there; in such a case, leave a link to that new location on this page).
Oh well, here we go again... In the List of years in science and <Year> in science articles (such as the present one), as well as in many other science and technology-related articles, the words «science» and «technology» are bandied about as if they were identical concepts; most commonly done by implicitly equating science with technology. This misleading mix-up/misunderstanding should really not be present in a serious encyclopedia. >:-(
IMNSHO we should therefore try and get the affected articles automagically* renamed to List of years in science and technology, <Year> in science and technology, and so forth (* e.g. [having a knowledgeable person] write+run some kind of script performing the renamings by way of SQL operations or whatever). --Wernher 12:30, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should those categories together, and rename "<YEAR>_in_science" to "<YEAR>_in_science_and_technology". Anybody have a script? Awolf002 18:55, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Arrgh! Science &ne; Technology!

message: I think we should not collect a list of external links to other people's summaries. That would get ugly and awkward very fast. I will remove the one just added. Comments? Awolf002 15:32, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To User Awolf002: The answer seems obvoius - this page like most pages on Wikipedia should have an external links section which will allow the readers to gather more relevant information. Every year there are many summeries of science and tech published around the web many of the (like the one I mentioned) add information which people won't put in this page but still find interesting.
Well, could you please look at WP:EL? Please, check What should be linked to, item 5, and What should not be linked to, item 8. I think you definitely skirting on the edges with this link. Anybody else have an oppinion to offer? Awolf002 22:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to external lists/summaries
Talk:Romanian ethnic minority parties

message: Not my native language, but shouldn't Evreiesti be Evreieşti? (I'm not sure, because I know the adjective is evriesc). -- Jmabel | Talk 01:29, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
*I see this is now fixed, thanks. -- Jmabel | Talk 16:42, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)
* No mention about the small Franco-descended people, the Walsers of French-Swiss ancestry from Valais, Switzerland moved into Wallachia during the Austro-Hungarian empire era (late 1800's) to cultivate and develop high-quality wines across Hungary and Romania, one of them is the famed Tokay wines prized by both the Hapsburgs and Romanov families in Russia. + 71.102.32.144 (talk) 19:05, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:VM Labs

message: please excuse my presumption but this to me reads only as a rant against one company (VM Labs) , and so would be out of place ,as writen, in Wikipedia. If not reworded may be considered as a BIASED ARTICLE.Please see  "Category:Articles which may be biased".Thanks (Forgot to sign it before ,so  --Ludek9 15:29, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This sentence isn't especially good:
What does commoditized mean in this context? What is the impact? Why is a specific competitor mentioned? 78.82.28.8 (talk) 22:13, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD chipset market became commoditized through the entry of competitors like Mediatek
Talk:Leonard Koppett

message: [you may have the original title...it was later changed to "fan" (look on amazon.com...I assume, because "man" was realised to be sexist to female fans)]
:Yes, I do have the original 1967 hardcover, titled A Thinking Man's Guide to Baseball.  Didn't realize the book had been revised and was still in print, am glad it is.    Wasted Time R 01:41, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Richmond Barthé

message: This seems more like a cut-n-paste from the referenced articles than an original writing.  Might it be copyvio?  --Xcali 01:48, 7 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: this is what is seems to me too.  Several of the sentences, if Googled, show up elsewhere.  So . . . . . . ............... ?  Carptrash 04:24, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I located the author of much of this article - and she was "Not Amused." [my words, her sentiment] - so I am going to cut out as much of the offending material as I can.  Carptrash 22:53, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: " recognized as one of the foremost sculptors of his generation, and is"
:it seems to me that this is a bit over stated.  He is (in my opinion) a minor sculptor in his or any other generation.  Feel free to convince me otherwise.  Should be pretty easy if the statement is true. eeeek Carptrash (talk) 03:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just moved this here, from the article 

message: ===Lede===
The lead section of this article is not clear and it does not summarize the article’s key points. It is unclear what criteria have been taken into consideration when selecting the artist’s most important works. Also, there are citations needed. The quotation at the beginning of the article, for instance, does not cite the source of the quote. The lead section also lacks clarity, for example, the article mentions Frank Lloyd Wright's Fallingwater House, which is generally referred to as simply Fallingwater or the Kaufmann’s residency or the House at Bear Run. Furthermore, Fallingwater does not own the 1932 version of Rose McClendon, but rather a later enlarged copy. 
:Great comments. Don't forget to sign your name! Aolivex (talk) 15:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede, structure, completeness, references 

message: The lead section of this article is not clear and it does not summarize the article’s key points. It is unclear what criteria have been taken into consideration when selecting the artist’s most important works. Also, there are citations needed. The quotation at the beginning of the article, for instance, does not cite the source of the quote. The lead section also lacks clarity, for example, the article mentions Frank Lloyd Wright's Fallingwater House, which is generally referred to as simply Fallingwater or the Kaufmann’s residency or the House at Bear Run. Furthermore, Fallingwater does not own the 1932 version of Rose McClendon, but rather a later enlarged copy. 
:Great comments. Don't forget to sign your name! Aolivex (talk) 15:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Lede

message: I can't find the part in the book cited for "Once, when interviewed, Barthé indicated that he was homosexual." The book that was cited specifically says "Barthé was a closeted homosexual" (Page 5) Frogtd129 (talk) 13:22, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out as gay