lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Esther Wong

message: *http://citizinemag.com/music/music-0511_inmemoriam_punknews.htm
*http://www.greatestjournal.com/users/gothcomic/14631.html?mode=reply
*http://www.laweekly.com/la-vida/a-considerable-town/farewell-madame-wong/8214/
*http://www.punknews.org/article/13510
*http://jglb.blogspot.com/2005/09/rip-esther-wong.html
*http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2005-08-17-wong-obit_x.htm
*http://www.citypaper.com/news/story.asp?id=11283
*http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/08/17/BAGKTE90821.DTL  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.200.243.253 (talk) 19:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:California Fuel Cell Partnership

message: Dates need and infor and tense need to be updated it is 2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.98.247.99 (talk) 01:20, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Put in flags to note the general lack of sources for anything in this article.  Cited a few examples of editorial statements by either the page author or the organization the group is about. It seems to me that large sections of this page are inappropriate but I'm unsure exactly how much needs to be taken out.Aramintywhitesell (talk) 20:18, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of Neutrality and Sources
Talk:Eugene J. Martin

message: I would describe this page as "pure chaos". Can't it be re-lay-outed?? 87.64.203.71 (talk) 21:45, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chaos
Talk:Tomo-Dachi

message: The recent edit makes this article appear more like a press release or friendly write-up rather than an encyclopedic article. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 17:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made some alterations. If there is more to do point me in the right direction, because I don’t see too much difference now between this article and the other UK based convention Amecon Butch-cassidy 09:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement

message: I removed the claim that this convention had the second appearance of US guests.  There were US guest appearances at Shinenkai 1998, Aya Again in 2003, and Amecon in 2004.  ...so it's more like fourth...at which point it's just silly to claim such a thing. --PatrickD 22:39, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Second US Guests claim

message: This article is wrote in a manner that makes it sound like the 2007 Tomodaichi Con hasn't happened, when it is obvious it is 2008. Shouldn't this be updated? Unfortunatly, I have only found out about this event, so I do not have any avaliable information on this event whatsoever. Irish Plusle (talk) 13:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Outdated?
Talk:Indigenous psychology

message: My undergraduate major was Native American Studies and I know there are works by American Indians which deal with Native American psychology. 
The authors should read works by American Indians to have a better understanding of their subject. I can recommend the book "Native American Post-Colonial Psychology" by Eduardo and Bonnie Duran, as well as many books by Vine Deloria, Jr. All three authors have Ph.D.'s and have taught in major universities. And all are American Indian.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.160.232.63 (talk) 22:47, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indigenous Psychology
Talk:Eva Renzi

message: According to this one, she eventually married Hubschmid, her costar in Funeral in Berlin: http://flickr.com/photos/truusbobjantoo/2312040069/ She and Hubschmid were als in "Playgirl," a German film that pre-dates Funeral in Berlin.  this German film site 
http://www.filmportal.de/df/05/Uebersicht,,,,,,,,EF75A8FB7325D153E03053D50B370E84,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.html 
has much more info, but "Texts and photos have been made available or have been licensed for use on filmportal.de exclusively."   	 
Eva Renzi - Actress
     
Gaintes (talk) 02:53, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Married to Paul Hubschmid
Talk:Ilyas Kandhlawi

message: As I often chastise others for tagging articles without discussion, I would be remiss if I didn't post here myself; this article is highly POV to the point where it borders on hagiography. I know very little about this person; if anyone could help clean up this article it would be appreciated. Joefromrandb (talk) 04:24, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: It has been two and half years since this got tagged with extreme, almost hagiographic POV. I am now removing the POV sections. If any sources exist for this information please be kind enough to add it to the article and remove the peacock from the basket before unloading. FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 06:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing POV parts, its been two years since the taggng
Talk:Faith McNulty

message: What a great author.  I remember her children's books from when I was a kid quite well.  "Arty the Smarty," the story of a little fish that wanted to make a big splash, was my favorite.  Rest in Peace, Faith.24.250.115.92 (talk) 22:54, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Philippe Nahon

message: I'm seeing different sources that say two different ages. Some say 81 and some say 82. I am really confused here. MikaelaArsenault (talk) 15:58, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps some sources only know he was born in 1938 and don’t know or care about the month, so 2020–1938=82 to them. Wyliepedia @ 02:14, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age
Talk:Suicidology

message: The relevance of what is discussed in Suicidology#Suicide myths to the subject of this article is highly questionable. The section discusses common misconceptions about suicide in general, but that's not directly related to suicidology as an academic field. The section seems to have been in this article for more than ten years, so I'm tagging it with  for now, rather than removing it immediately. First Comet (talk) 10:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the section. See Special:Diff/1179957474 for the text if someone is willing to work on it by moving the section to an appropriate suicide-related article. Be sure to properly attribute the text to this article in your edit summary (see WP:COPYWITHIN). First Comet (talk) 15:26, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide myths
Talk:BMW H2R

message: Is this car record breaking for hydrogen cars, or all cars...? 82.16.7.63 23:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification  

message: Hello to all, for a European project of a European record, I see no reason why all speeds should be expressed in mph and then - only in parenthesis - in km/h.
So I simply inverted the order. Thanks 194.39.218.10 (talk) 10:22, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  mph vs km/h
Talk:General Motors Hy-wire

message: it needs a picture. - —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.17.197.169 (talk • contribs)  02:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: done... I almost forgot I had taken these... - Adolphus79 04:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

text: HowStuffWorks has a gallery of Hy-wire pictures. They are copyrighted, but fair-use is better than nothing. -Ian01 (talk) 03:27, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: picture

message: *powered by a fuel cell capable of producing 94 kilowatts ...
*With its 250 to 380 watt three-phase electric motor ...
*What do they do with all the other kilowatts? -- Crato (talk) 12:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was support for move. As for hyphenation, a Google search to see which one is more common shows the original, hyphenated name appears to be far more common (hy-wire vs. hywire).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 23:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: power

message: The link at Video of Hy-wire in operation by Top Gear might be dead.  Josh-Levin@ieee.org (talk) 08:47, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expired link
Talk:Otto Erich Deutsch

message: I removed the following reference:
:*
I'm not sure it's properly formatted, and the ref is (at least at the moment) inaccessible.  Is Deutsch's contribution an essay in the larger work, and is it somehow relevant to the article, other than being an example of his publications?
I also added a cite for Deutsch's best-known work, the Schubert catalogue.
Magicpiano (talk) 13:03, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted one cite, added another

message: A recent edit indicates that Deutsch was a Protestant of Jewish origin.  I've looked over correspondence between Deutsch and Schenker which is sprinkled with Yiddishisms, which I would think would be atypical of someone who wasn't Jewish. Can someone find more information? - kosboot (talk) 13:04, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: See entry in the Lexikon verfolgter Musiker und Musikerinnen der NS-Zeit: "1903 war Deutsch, der aus einer jüdischen Familie stammte, zum evangelischen Glauben konvertiert." [Deutsch, who came from a Jewish family, converted in 1903 to the Protestant faith.] -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:03, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protestant?
Talk:Johann Michael Vogl

message: Does anybody have any refs which discuss Vogl's vocal range, vocal weight etc? To be able to sing both Orestes (high baritone) and Pizarro (bass-baritone) is pretty unusual. Furthermore the keys Schubert published Winterreise in are - to put it mildly - fairly lofty for a baritone: many songs go up to G, a few to G#, one has an optional A: presumably these were the keys that Vogl performed the cycle in? Thanks for any help! almost-instinct 17:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vocal range
Talk:Fritz Reiner

message: Juvenile too.  Janos Starker, who admired Reiner, said in his autobiography that offstage Reiner would engage in staring contests with his musicians.  If the musician looked away first, "you were done for" in his book.  74.90.225.87 (talk) 12:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Personally abusive" 

message: The real birth name "Reiner Frigyes" is mentioned in small letters before the start, but the main name is shown as "Frederick Martin Reiner", and there is no mention of when the name "Fritz" was first use.  Also, he's described only as American whereas he was born in Hungary.
I'd expect the article to start with something like:
Fritz Reiner, originally Reiner Frigyes, Westernized as Frederick Martin Reiner, was a Hungarian-born American conductor... 85.64.175.133 (talk) 16:47, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   When was he renamed Fritz?
Talk:Adam Liszt

message: This guy's name was Adam List, not Liszt! His father's first name was not György, but also Adam. He also was not transferred to Raiding in 1809. This article is very flawed.--178.190.53.158 (talk) 16:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: literally you are so bored man 213.96.40.46 (talk) 12:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

text: but also great especification 213.96.40.46 (talk) 12:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of name

message: This of course is nonsense, because Franz Liszt was named Franz after his godfather.--178.190.48.110 (talk) 10:48, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: "Which probably gave him the inspiration to name his son Franz."

message: The genealogy at the Pfarre Paudorf website  is flawed and 100% plagiarized from the faulty secondary literature. It should not be used for a Wikipedia article.--91.113.60.191 (talk) 08:13, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Udo Fischer's genealogy
Talk:Glossary of figure skating terms

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 08:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-7 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: Skate Canada has decided to no longer use the terms choctaw and mohawk, instead they are using s-step and c-step, to work towards decolonization of terminology that aligns with Skate Canada's inclusion and anti-racism priorities. This may not be an urgent change, because it is not widespread yet, but overtime once other countries are also using this terminology it should definitely be reflected here.-CyanCaribou (talk) 00:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusive terms
Talk:Marie d'Agoult

message: Many sources say 31 December, but I have a note that she was born at 11.55 pm on 30 December.  --  JackofOz (talk) 02:23, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, apparently she was born at (or close to) midnight, so I guess it's a moot point and we're never going to know for 100% certain.  I suppose we have to go with what the reliable sources say.  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 21:24, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Fibula (brooch)

message: The page Fibula should be a disambiguation page, leading to Fibula (archaeology) (now Fibulae and ancient brooches)  and Fibula (anatomy) (now Fibula). Seem like a good idea? --Wetman 21:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've alerted the administrator User:Zoe, who is always willing to help. --Wetman 05:09, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Always willing to stick my nose in, you mean?  :)  Well, to begin with, we should use a singular article title, such as Fibula (brooch).  I have no problem with a disambiguation page for the default title.  User:Zoe|(talk) 23:25, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Any objections, anyone? Zoe, would you do that for the article, after a decent interval? --Wetman 06:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, I'll wait about a week. Prod me if I forget, ok?  User:Zoe|(talk) 16:24, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I have been away travelling.  All sounds fine to me. Thanks for helping. Otlichnik 11:31, 6 October 2006
I created Fibula (disambiguation) and added top hats .. I think fibula is most commonly used to mean the calf bone, no need to lock up that name space as a dab page. I think brooch and Fibulae and ancient brooches cover the same ground and may need to be merged and/or better defined as articles. -- Stbalbach 15:29, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested moves
Talk:Fibula

message: The page Fibula should be a disambiguation page, leading to Fibula (archaeology) (now Fibulae and ancient brooches)  and Fibula (anatomy) (now Fibula). Seem like a good idea? --Wetman 21:24, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested moves 

message: This section describing a surgical technique, and not the Fibula itself, comes from https://wiki.uiowa.edu/display/protocols/Osteocutaneous+Fibula+Free+Flap with no attribution. I have deleted it entirely.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astaines (talk • contribs) 18:06, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Fibular flap

message: Back when it was still Discovery Health Channel, there was a show about a runner who ended up destroying the blood supply to the heads of his femurs. The condition he had would likely not have been a problem until very late in life if he hadn't been running for exercise every day. That was fixed via an operation that took the center sections of his fibulas and inserted them into holes drilled into the femur heads, ending just short of the ball surface. The main veins and arteries to the fibula sections were kept attached, re-routed up through his thighs. The operation saved him from needing a double hip joint replacement, he could still walk and run but mostly switched to riding a bicycle for exercise. From that it appears as if the fibula in humans is mostly a vestigial bone as the upper end isn't in the knee joint and the lower end only has a minor function in the ankle joint. Bizzybody (talk) 20:08, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Femur repairs with the fibula. 

message: Unnecessary to have two separate articles. The 'head' article is short and easily merged. This benefits readers because the content is on one page, and future readers because a single edit can affect more content. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:23, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Head of fibula]] 

message: As above. No need to make things difficult by readers or arrange our pages per Gray's Anatomy 1918 edition. Tom (LT) (talk) 09:24, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Body of fibula]] 

message: The "Blood supply" section launches into surgical procedures without actually describing the blood supply itself - the first sentence is "The blood supply is important for planning free tissue transfer because the fibula is commonly used to reconstruct the mandible."  Could this be clarified to first discuss the structure of the blood supply, then possibly discuss implications for surgery?  I would have a go at it myself, but I don't have a medical background (I do have a fibula, which is why I'm reading this page) so I might do more harm than good in trying.  Kenahoo (talk) 22:46, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange tone in "Blood supply" section
Talk:Pauline von Metternich

message: Why is the duel called a "emancipated duel"? Surely it is a all-female duel. Emancipated is not a synonym for female.Royalcourtier (talk) 04:08, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted that mention. Then on further reading I discovered the whole story is fake, so I removed all description of the duel. Also note that German Wikipedia contains no mention of this fictional duel. -  Metalello talk 16:09, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Emancipated" duel
Talk:Wieland Wagner

message: Wieland and his brother Wolfgang became festival directors in place of their mother, whose association with Adolf Hitler had made her unacceptable. (Wieland's own past was, however, suppressed.)
:What was it that needed suppressing? The article suggests that he was quite a reluctant supporter of the regime. Valetude (talk) 17:39, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suppressing his past?
Talk:Friedelind Wagner

message: Shouldn't "ethnicity" be "German" rather than "White"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.183.183.176 (talk) 19:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It says in the article that the Isle of Man is part of England. The IOM is a crown dependency and part of neither England nor the UK.  
	
"She lived for a short time in Switzerland before emigrating first to England, where she had been interned on the Isle of Man from 27. May 1940 till 15. February 1941"-213.205.241.225 (talk) 09:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Isle of Man is not English
Talk:Rochester Bridge

message: feel free to add, especially too the railway bridge section Pratj 21:29, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Oh dear, I was just admiring your work in creating this article, and was about to send you a big congrats on it, when I realised some of the prose was familiar... I'm afraid we aren't allowed to copy and paste text from other sources, because the original writer/publisher will have copyright on it. We have to write the whole thing again in our own words (tediously like being back in school). So I'm terribly sorry to say that I've removed all the cut-n-paste text.
BUT. Really well done on starting the article - it's long overdue. And now it's there, I'm sure it will grow nicely... :-) JackyR | Talk 11:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, they tend to discourage that, because it's too hard to write something sufficiently different. Best idea is probably to read it from teh original site in one window, then flick to another window and write what you think you remembered, rather than have the text there and edit it. Like you say, that learning curve thingy... Besides, I like the structure you already introduced! It's been preserved in the subheads. go for it! JackyR | Talk 21:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really sorry, but... 

message: In digging around I find that The Rochester Bridge Trust is fond of the date 1381- while Hasted likes 1281. We have one source that credits Joseph Cubbit with a road bridge and another that thinks it was the rail bridge? ClemRutter (talk) 19:46, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at Traffic and Politics: The construction and management of Rochester Bridge AD 43–1993, Nicholas Brooks says on p. 40 that it was in the winter of 1380–81, so not 1281, that meltwater and ice floes caused great damage. And in the same book it seems William Cubitt was responsible for a road bridge and designed the railway bridge. I'll replace the erroneous Hasted with Brooks, but as I can't see enough of the book via Google Books to be confident of what it says about Cubitt I'll leave that, for now at least. Cheers. Nortonius (talk) 21:47, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source conflict
Talk:Winifred Wagner

message: She is Welsh because her father was called Williams? Did she ever live in Wales? Jagdfeld (talk) 16:44, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welsh 
Talk:Operation Anadyr

message: This article is totally inadequate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.72.186 (talk) 05:16, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it sucks pretty badly. 86.127.138.234 (talk) 19:24, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this the right infobox for the operation? I think it's a little strange that it's basically just half blank. Isn't there any alternative infobox or is this the bright one? Terrortank (talk) 11:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox

message: ...being poorly written overall with lots of repetition (including annoying and rather useless "See also" in the middle of the text) this page actually fails to outline anything interesting, including the fact that Pliyev had a bunch of nuclear-tipped Lunas (and nuclear tipped version of FKR-1) at his disposal which he was pre-authorized to launch in case of US invasion... and if he lost contact with Moscow . Also, the US failed to spot the Lunas... or correctly identify the nuclear tipped FKR-1s  The page needs a serious overhaul to be a serious article. 86.127.138.234 (talk) 19:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  (much later) I've used single "Further information" links to reduce the distraction that "See also, See also" was causing. Thanks for letting us know. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:21, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Besides... 

message: Reading the one-sided presentation in this article you'd think the Soviets were some ubermaster at this. If you read Fursenko and Naftali esp. pp. 451-452 you'll see a fairly different picture. The Soviets were reasonably successful in concealing the cargo while it was on their ships, but they almost immediately lost all concealment after disembarking it... no matter what it was, SAMs, the actual nukes etc. The only substantial case of bad info on the US side was the mis-identification of FKR-1s as non-nuclear anti-shipping missiles. 86.127.138.234 (talk) 03:37, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maskirovka issues 

message: Rudolf Anderson's U-2 was shot down over Cuba during the operation, I think he should be counted as an American casualty in the military box and get a brief mention in relation to the American surveillance flights over Cuba.
RocketsFallOnRocketFalls (talk) 15:49, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rudolf Anderson
Talk:Convair YB-60

message: The Convair flew before the Boeing? That doesn't agree with the dates given in the articles: 18 and 15 April respectively. Drutt (talk) 14:23, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: sorted.  --J Clear (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: First flight

message: Was program cancellation  on 14 August 1952 or on 20 January 1953 ?
Jarfe (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 07:18, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Date for cancel

message: The text says a crew of 10, but the data section says 5.  Some correction or explanation is needed.  --J Clear (talk) 16:32, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crew count 

message: The following values do not match up correctly (especially the empty weight):
"Empty weight: 1,530–16 lb (694–7 kg)
Gross weight: 160,000 lb (72,575 kg)
Max takeoff weight: 300,000 lb (136,078 kg)" Jhonmason (talk) 10:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specifications