lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Argentina–England football rivalry

message: Hi everyone.
At the beginning of the article says:
"England is regarded in Argentina as one of the major rivals of the national football team, matched only by Brazil and Uruguay."
I would add Chile at that count that is a country that has a sport rivalry with Argentina originated by non-sport reasson being very similar to this one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angel Millo (talk • contribs) 20:20, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Argentina's major rivals"
Talk:The World of Apu

message: This article should be returned to The World of Apu because that is how it was released in the English speaking world (see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (films)). The other 2 films in the trilogy are listed under their original names because they were released under those names even in the English speaking world. Cop 663 13:29, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The title The World of Apu has been restored as the result of a move request listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Dekimasuよ! 03:00, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: The citation does not say that Clannad was influenced by this; it recommends The World of Apu for those who like Clannad. Brutannica (talk) 23:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Clannad''
Talk:Toothpick

message: While the reference is sort of funny, it's a bit obscure, and on the practical level I don't think it's at all necessary to include a three-step set of instructions on how to use a toothpick.  --Mr. Billion 23:03, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Douglas Adams joke: How to use a toothpick

message: Can somebody tell me why so many Japanese seem to think Japan invented the toothpick?--213.172.254.110 08:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Japanese toothpicks

message: Is he really an avid toothpick fan or does he just use toothpicks? People might also chew gum often without being avid chewing gum fans. Unigolyn 14:38, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joe Pesci 

message: Does the Oral Sex article really have anything to do with the toothpick? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dino (talk • contribs) 19:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oral Sex 

message: Should we include something about toothpick etiquette? In Brazil, for exemple, it is considered bad manners to use a toothpick in public. SaintCahier 03:18, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etiquette 

message: What kind of wood is used in making toothpicks? Why? 
Which countries are importers and exporters of toothpicks?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.176.75.2 (talk) 22:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  wood 

message: I noticed there is no redirect to Toothpick the musician- I don't think there is one. Anyone want to start one?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.115.1.85 (talk) 02:23, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toothpick 

message: The article was turning into a collection of unordered unsourced trivia... I tried to reorder the reliable information in a logical sequence and removed the unsourced stuff. SaintCahier (talk) 14:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restyled 

message: How come such an insipid article attract so much vandalism? SaintCahier (talk) 17:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: The Wire - ‘The Toothpick: Technology and Culture’ has a book review of the item we currently have in "Further reading". It might have useful information. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:25, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Toothpick - book review 

message: It'd also be nice to have a section on the fashion-accessory usage of the toothpick (perhaps as derivative of the hay-stem?). -- Quiddity (talk) 19:25, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fashion

message: Is there any source for the statement that China exports 24 billion dollars worth of toothpicks each year? that seems excessively high and i haven't found any other sources for that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thebt (talk • contribs) 01:46, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That is exactly what I thought on reading the article - make some reasonable assumptions and you find the average toothpick user is spending $100 on toothpicks every year, which is kerrrazy stuff. So I've removed it. Egg Centric 23:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  24 billion? 

message: Justice is surved 166.198.38.17 (talk) 18:39, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captured
Talk:U.S. Route 12 in Michigan

message: The length given for current Business US 12 is 8.020 miles, which is the same length given to former Bus. US 112. But Bus. US 112 followed Michigan Avenue westward from downtown to I-94 Exit 181, which is not the current routing. While Bus. US 12 did assume that original routing when US 112 was cancelled in 1962, it assumed its current routing via the one-way couplet of Hamilton and Huron Streets in 1971. PR Finder defines Bus. US 12 by the current route, from the intersection of the eastbound exit ramp and Huron Street to the junction of Michigan Avenue and US 12 west of Denton Road, with the eastbound length measuring 5.334 miles and the westbound length measuring 5.867 miles. I don't know if the info box can be adjusted to show the differing lengths, but 8.020 miles is definitely wrong as the route is currently defined. 38.122.60.10 (talk) 14:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Business US 12 Ypsilanti length
Wikipedia talk:Signatures should not contain images

message: Now that the devs have implemented code that forces a correct signature, it would be possible to also ask them to forbid certain tags in signatures - in particular, images. What do people think about allowing images in signatures? (other possibilities include the 'big' tag and line breaks, since they're rather annoying) Radiant_>|< 17:00, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *What about a middle route? Don't ban anything (for now), but let those who are concerned by sigs go somewhere and develop some kind of good-practice guidelines (WP:SIGS?). This would at least flag up to new users the types of signs that are considered poor form by some users, what their concerns might be, technical considerations, and some 'good practice' examples. People with problamatic sigs could be pointed towards it, avoiding long explainations on case by case basis, and without instruction creep. --Doc ask? 18:42, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

text: *Serious project indeed. --cesarb 18:51, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. We only have around 50 pages of self-indulgent joking. That's pretty serious, all things considered. Phil Sandifer 18:54, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied from [[WP:ANI]]

message: Images should not be prohibited, but restricted instead. Make them the same size or smaller than the surrounding text so they don't disrupt its flow. That said,the <-big-> tag and line breaks should be prohibited, they don't add any creative elements, and are annoying and ugly. Titoxd(?!?) 23:45, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the only problem I've ever had with them, when they take up more than one line, it disrupts the other text on that and surrounding lines. All I'd suggest is the restriction  Titoxd talked about. Rx StrangeLove 01:54, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree with that. (Not too surprisingly, perhaps.)  ᓇᐃᑦᔅᑕᓕᐅᓐ ✉ 13:03, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Discussion 

message: I know this isn't really related to this issue, but I was wondering if anyone could help me with my signature. I want it in all black, except for the green esperanza e, but don't want it to be too big with extra font tags. I want the m to link to m:Wikimania 2006, the e to link to ESP (in green), the u to link to my userpage, the t to my talk, and that's all. Which brings up another issue I have; MediaWiki's auto linking, which makes the text after the link part of the link, which is kinda annoying. Text is automatically black, so I thought I would be fine, but nooooo. If anyone can help me with this (or if anyone knows how to handle monobook skins), I'd really appreciate it if they dropped me a line at my talk page. Thanks, Mysekurity 05:15, 18 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  My sig 

message: Pretty much everything that's said here is said at Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages under "Things to avoid".   Is there any reason for keeping this guideline at all? Stevage 11:53, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest deletion: Covered under [[WP:SIG]]
Talk:Chris Finch (disambiguation)

message: I changed it from "traveling salesman" to "outside salesman." I tried to use more of an industry term. At least in the US, someone who does sales from the office or takes the orders is an insides salesman. (I used to be in inside sales.) Someone who goes to different places of business personally is an outside salesman. Well at least in the U.S. SChaos1701 (talk) 20:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, as long as we don't have the corresponding article here on the Wikipedia. --Emc² • contact me 06:26, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Finch
Talk:Vauxhall Victor

message: The article states that the 4/90 stands for 4 cylinder, 90 cubic inch... I always thought it was meant to be 90 bhp, though the 90 c.i. sounds feasible as this is about 1500cc. Graham 23:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VX4/90

message: So the Vauxhall Cavalier, a large family car, had as its predecessor this small/medium model, whose real successor is the execute Vauxhall Carlton.  I'm confused.
Or are the "small" and "medium" labels just the size, and independent of class?  Did the Victor belong to any class? -- Smjg (talk) 17:04, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class 

message: What's a "turtle-deck".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.161.73.124 (talk) 06:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: turtle-deck
Talk:Healthy diet

message: — Assignment last updated by Dianafv02 (talk) 03:40, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Microbiology of College Life

message: — Assignment last updated by KristinaAllen (talk) 23:11, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP23 - Sect 201 - Thu

message: Just a heads-up that as part of an editathon I'm leading on June 17, new editors might be making some edits to this article. I will be giving them specific MEDRS-compliant sources to use and advising them to be concise. I'll be following up shortly afterwards to check for copyright compliance and other quality issues and will clean up stuff if needed. Cheers, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 23:07, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editathon June 17 

message: TamaraZahran (talk) 08:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 10:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 November 2023 

message: {{subst:trim|1=
(spam link redacted)
: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Liu1126 (talk) 10:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link
Talk:Matthew 5:13

message: See salt of the earth 24.54.208.177 00:00, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Animalize

message: A citation to this source would be appropriate.  I don't hear any Boston similarities to the sound on this album versus any other KISS album.  I believe, more than the equipment used to record, the mixing of the recorded music plays a vital role in achieving that "Boston sound," as described in the article, though the Rockman was innovative and produced amazing results.
Still, a citation is in order here.  209.254.200.110 (talk) 21:40, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're mostly spot on with that, with the following distinction...Yes, Elder cover = no band members...Double Platinum did not picture them either, but it is a "compilation" album, rather than a "studio" album, which is the distinction that most wankers on here make. Excellent try, though, you nailed it with the Elder example. Cheers! FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 17:56, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Rockman gear

message: I went to RockPages.gr to see if I could back up Mitch Weissman's statement about playing on "Animalize", but I came up empty-handed.  Perhaps I should've looked first, but I can only assume the info is old; that would explain the lack of info on the website.  Anyone else have any idea of how I may be able to back up the claim?
Maggie The Doggie (talk) 07:17, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mitch Weissman

message: The album was released in September 1984. Everybody agrees on that. 
The RIAA says it was released on September 1, 1984. That was a Saturday.
AllMusic says it was released on Thursday, September 13, 1984. This same date was present at the AllMusic website in 2012, and it was published in the All Music Guide book in 2002. AllMusic has remained consistent. The 2017 book Encyclopedia of KISS: Music, Personnel, Events and Related Subjects also uses this date. The 2008 book KISS: Behind the Mask uses this date.
FMQB wrote on September 14, 1984, that the album would be released on September 17, a Monday.
FYI, Billboard noticed the album on October 6, 1984, when it first entered the Billboard 200 at number 117.
The release date sources are respected, but they don't agree. The album release days are strange in each case. Typical album release dates are Fridays, but none of these are Friday.
In Wikipedia terms, the September 13 date is the most widely published. Wikipedia is supposed to be a summary of published material. But sometimes we have to look at how Wikipedia itself can influence later publications. This article was started by  in 2005 with a release date of September 13 (see the .) The only reference was the fan page KissFAQ, unfortunately, now considered unreliable per WP:USERG. That "reference" gave the date September 13. In 2009,  added a better reference to support the Sept 13 date. I am unable to tease out an archived copy of that reference which was hosted by billboard.com. But we should respect the 2009 referencing effort as valid at the time. Binksternet (talk) 16:45, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three different release dates in respected sources
Talk:Fokker Dr.I

message: The german wikipedia "says" 420 planes. What is correct? Any sources? Vermeer (talk) 07:44, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The 320 number seems to be correct. The "Fokker Triplane" Windsock datafile (No.5) gives a production list, and says 320 were made, including prototypes on page 1. Production numbers could be inflated by Vagel-Grip Flugzeugbau production post-war (as the SP.5 Grief) but I have no source for them, however I doubt they made more than one. - NiD.29 (talk) 08:14, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Number build

message: It appears from the entry on Werner Voss that his death had nothing to do with any problems inherent in the design of the Dr.1 but was the result of facing odds of 7:1 against. Should the main entry be rewritten slightly to clarify that? (71.22.47.232 (talk) 06:35, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voss's death 

message: "...no further information about the Sopwith design..."
Typically when reading, you expect an isolated fact like this to go somewhere, but in this Article it doesn't.  Why would he not give "further information", why was this fact important, and (most importantly) why is this fact included in the Article when it doesn't go anywhere?Tym Whittier (talk) 18:05, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "No Further Information" is Non-Sequitur that Goes Nowhere
Talk:Hawaii–Aleutian Time Zone

message: Needs rewrite. It confuses time ZONE with time OFFSET.
Hawaii-Aleutian Standard Time is observed in Hawaii all year round. 
Parts of Alaska, however, observe daylight saving time along with the rest of America. --Uncle Ed 17:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Cut from article:
:Most of Alaska observes daylight saving time along with the rest of the United States (HDT).
:The region includes the U.S. state of Hawaii and Alaska's Aleutian Islands west of 169° 30′ west. It is the time zone located just west of the Alaska Standard Time Zone.
:When Alaska observes daylight saving time, the timezone is known as "Hawaii-Aleutian Daylight Time", or "HADT" for short.  During this period the region is nine hours behind UTC (UTC-9).
:Hawaii, on the other hand, does not observe daylight saving time.  The timezone is known as Hawaii Standard Time (or Hawaiian Standard Time) in Hawaii and is always UTC-10 throughout the year.
The only part readily salvageable here is the data on the Aleutians. --Uncle Ed 17:56, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed it myself, and basically rewrote the top section. I've also removed the stub labels. Jon 19:13, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What a mishmash
Talk:AtomicPark.com

message: I have question about user:atomicparnk recent edit to this page.  I looks as though they are just removing negative information about their company.  I have no stand on the information it self however, to self edit such is not in good form.  I have reverted the edit twice as well as posted the following to the user talk page:
I have questions about the NPOV problems that are come up when you edit a entry about a company you are clearly a part.  This is a even greater problem being it is to remove negative information about your company.  I a change is in order please bring it to the talk page of the entry before changing it again.  ThanksTheRanger 20:17, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello... permission does not need to be granted for legitimate edits to Wikipedia, but the removal of blocks of text with out an edit summary do tend to draw the scrutiny of other editors. The referenced news item appears to me to be notable and written with a balanced neutral point of view. Based on how long ago the issue occurred and the current length of the article as a whole, I personally would not object to it being abridged somewhat. Even better would be to expand the rest of the article though. ;) Take care! 72.131.44.247 00:43, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Tfm

message: This template passes  to , but that template does not use a parameter named like that. Am I missing something or is this code that is no longer in use? --Gonnym (talk) 15:05, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  demo parameter 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Template talk:Infobox royalty#Infobox advisory detached from infobox.  (relating to a recent edit that had the effect of hiding all non-inline TfD tags on mobile) * Pppery * it has begun... 16:03, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Template talk:Infobox royalty#Infobox advisory detached from infobox]]

message: Please add the .mbox-tfd class to this template to make it easier for this template to be detected using code.  (This is a templates for discussion nomination template, so it makes sense, but feel free to do tfm.) Aasim 06:12, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Primefac (talk) 10:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

text: I find this request to be perfectly clear.  * Pppery * it has begun... 13:56, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, sleep-addled brain looking at requests, for some odd reason I was looking at  itself. Sorry 'bout that. Primefac (talk) 14:53, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 25 August 2020 

message: The current version of the template does not allow for merging a template with a module and setting one of the display types as  is also used to set the merge target as a module. There are a few ways to fix this. One would be to add another parameter to set if the target is a module. Another would be to just use the full link name, including the namespace. I don't see a reason why writing "Test module" instead of "Module:Test module" would be better (at best, you need to remember not to copy the full name).
I've edited the sandbox with a version with the above change. Gonnym (talk) 12:18, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems reasonable, though the Twinkle folks will want to know about it. Primefac (talk) 12:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Notified now. Gonnym (talk) 12:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better handling with merging a template with a module
MediaWiki talk:Newarticletextanon

message: Could somebody please delete the extra </ul> in the source? silsor 00:36, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

message: Could someone with admin powers place something like this on:
	NOTE: A function of Wikipedia prohibitting non-registered users from creating articles is temporarily disabled.  Please use Articles for creation instead for guaranteed submission, as creation may be re-disabled at any time.  Thank you.
Wikipedia does not yet have a  page called . Would you like to search for  in Wikipedia?
* To start the page, type in the box below. When you're done, add an edit summary and press Save page. Your changes should be visible immediately.
* If you're a newcomer, please first read the introduction, tutorial, and your first article to ensure the quality of your new article.  
*For experimenting, please use the sandbox.
* If you recently created this page and it has not yet appeared, it may be due to a delay in updating the database, or the page may have been speedily deleted. Please wait and check the  deletion log before attempting to recreate it.
Something like that, in case the disabling breaks for some reason. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This, of course, would also sync it back up with MediaWiki:Newarticletext. --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:59, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow.  Not only did no one respond to your post for more than a year (Sorry!), but this MediaWiki message has been displayed for unregistered users creating new talk pages (incorrectly referred to as articles) the entire time.  For this reason, the custom message that you suggested won't work.  —David Levy 19:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sync and fix