lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Danger (AC/DC song)

message: I found :Image:AC-DC Fly On The Wall.JPG and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:AC-DC Fly On The Wall.JPG]]

message: :Image:AC-DC Fly On The Wall.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:AC-DC Fly On The Wall.JPG
Talk:Dangerously in Love (song)

message: I just performed a cleanup of this article, and I noticed it states this about the Beyonce solo version: "In the U.S. the song went for radio airplay only and was never released as a single in other countries". Are there any sources to support this statement, and if the Beyonce version was released as a single, why is there an album track infobox rather than the one for singles? Thanks. Extraordinary Machine 20:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single release?
Talk:Danke Schoen

message: Danke Schön is pronounced like Danke Shane in Yiddish; given the Yiddish presence in America, could this be a reason it is pronounced as such in English?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.212.106.138 (talk) 15:13, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Danke Shane 

message: The article claims that Yiddish and Pennsylvania Dutch are low German dialects contradicting the article on Yiddish and on Pennsylvania Dutch.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.105.228.215 (talk) 00:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spurious claim.
Talk:Dare to Be Stupid (song)

message: There is a  scene in the video of an interociter which is from the movie This Island Earth(1955)
which was the movie featured in the Mystery science theater 3000 movie(1996). I thought that was interesting.Sultangris 04:26, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I noticed it too.  It looks just like the one in the film.  Pretty obscure reference, given that this was released 10 years before MST3K! Pimlottc 06:39, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interociter

message: I would like to add this to the article if so. 100.36.106.17 (talk) 22:25, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Weird Al perform both of the distinct voices in this track? 

message: At the end of the video, Weird Al could be seen with the others on a cow riding off into the distance. This could be a nod to this Shout-era Honda Scooter commercial or the beginning of the R U X-perienced? music video. Please add this to the article if it's correct. Zerojuno (talk) 15:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Honda Scooter Ad/R U Xperienced reference
Talk:Gold Medal of the Royal Astronomical Society

message: Stopped in 1850. Please follow the list in the article and continue adding names to this category. --R.Sabbatini 19:24, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Date with the Night

message: I know the video was partly recorded at the Anson Rooms, I'm fourth row from the front in a shot :-), but I can't find verification and don't know if parts were recorded elsewhere. Kae1is 22:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video footage location 
Talk:David Watts (song)

message: What is this song about? Was there a real David Watts? --John (talk) 02:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure. I looked it up once, and I found a record of one "David Watts" who married a "Davies" (forgot her first name) back in the '60s, in London. Possibly a brother-in-law? I.M.S. (talk) 23:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning?
Talk:Day by Day (1945 song)

message: According to the Hot Butter link the song 'Day by Day' that is included on their CD Hot Butter is not the  Axel Stordahl/Paul Weston/Sammy Cahn one , but one written by Stephen Schwartz for the 1970 musical Godspell.  Hot Butter should therefore be removed from 'Day by Day (song)'86.16.159.144 (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different song?
Talk:Days of Wine and Roses (song)

message: Robin Gibb did not record the Mancini and Mercer "Days of Wine and Roses".  His song was written by Robin Gibb and Peter-John Vettese.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.114.106.11 (talk) 19:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested change to Recordings 

message: I removed "The melody is vaguely based on 'Auld Lang Syne' ". I cannot hear it, nor find any reference to its being derived from Auld Lang Syne. If someone has such a reference put it in here. I altered the other sentence because it made it sound like there are only two phrases in this song, while in fact it is sung as six:
The days of wine ... child at play
Through ... closing door
A door ... there before
The lonely ... with memories
Of the ... me to
The days ... you
Ellipses used to avoid copyright problems
Nick Beeson (talk) 11:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to introduction 

message: The body of the article does not mention the song won a Grammy in 1964. The lists below "References" can be expanded to discover this.
I suspect this fact is worthy of inclusion in the main part of the article. The Wikipedia list of winners links to this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.243.1.164 (talk) 03:42, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song of the Year 1964
Talk:Callendar–Van Dusen equation

message: This article should be listed under Physics or Materials Science, not Mathematics. Mathematics deals with abstract quantitative concepts. This equation deals with Platinum wire. Arch dude 19:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

message: The changes in February 2012‎ by 129.6.180.41 seem suspect.  The URL is to a DE domain with German text and it has a session ID in the link.  I think there are probably better references. The other changes seem fine but I think a better URL is needed. 38.116.199.99 (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISO link
Talk:Dear Mr. Fantasy

message: Why is there no discussion of the original Traffic version of the song? Considering that Dave Mason, the usual lead guitar player, is listed as playing bass guitar, is a bit unusual. I would be surprised if there wasn't a good story behind it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gil gosseyn (talk • contribs) 02:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traffic version 

message: What are the instruments played on this song 98.176.45.9 (talk) 01:24, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Drum kit, electric guitar, sitar, electric bass, Hammond/rock organ, vocals, backing vocals, harmonica from what I can hear. Alfonse Dubas (talk) 22:47, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instrument
Talk:Dear Old Stockholm

message: The article says "it [John Coltrane's version] can be found on Coltrane's Impressions album". This isn't strictly true, it's a bonus track on the CD reissue of Impressions, as mentioned at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impressions_%28John_Coltrane_album%29 .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.90.21.92 (talk) 23:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Coltrane's version
Talk:Death and the Maiden (The Verlaines song)

message: Death and the Maiden (Der Tod und das Mädchen) could refer to either the Schiele painting or to the 1894 painting of the same title by Edvard Munch (https://philamuseum.org/collection/object/76471). An article by Matthew Bannister (https://researcharchive.wintec.ac.nz/id/eprint/218/1/conference_m_bannister2.pdf) makes the same claim as this page, but with a different artist-- Munch, not Schiele: "Norwegian artist Edvard Munch’s “Death and the Maiden” (1894) features on the label of the Verlaines’ side of the Dunedin Double EP (1982)". Can anyone verify which painting The Verlaines were referring to, or which was reproduced on the Dunedin double? 66.180.180.26 (talk) 16:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Painting
Talk:Desperados Under the Eaves

message: I think this article makes the song sound too morose, I interpret it as more sarcastic. Any opinions? Comrade Graham (talk) 02:05, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

message: I mean I could tell you this was a personal song for Warren because I'm a musician and I know about Warren, that's the only thing that really needs to be cited - the interview. The rest of it is pretty much common knowledge. Anyone with a brain can figure out what the song is about. I'm going to have to disagree with the robots that this page has multiple issues.
On a side note Jackson Browne played this at a concert on the soundboard than covered another Zevon song. It was awesome. Didn't know they were so close. Burnedfaceless (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations
Talk:Despre tine

message: I can't find any information about this song, can anyone else?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamesguru2 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "About You..." By NexUS

message: The article mentions that Despre Tine was both released and recorded in 2002. It also mentions Dragostea Din Tei was both recorded and released in 2003. This would mean that Dragostea Din Tei is newer. However, the first paragraph refers to Dragostea Din Tei as “its predecessor” which means Despre Tine is newer. It would appear to be re-released in 2004, but I don’t know if it can really be a successor to Dragostea Din Tei if it also had a 2002 release. 97.113.132.34 (talk) 20:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency? Comparison to “Dragostea Din Tei” release and recording date
Talk:Diana (Paul Anka song)

message: ...at age 16? What a prodigy... Consider the I-VI-IV-V pattern, which would become a cliché in next to all rock of the early sixties. Has anything been published that aknowledges the influence this song has exerted? Steinbach (talk) 21:34, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written by Anka himself
Talk:Diary of a Madman (Ozzy Osbourne song)

message: I actually believe this could be considered progressive rock. Maybe progressive metal. I mean, it has it all, unusual time signatures, and constantly changing... dissonance, classical references. More instruments (strings section). To me it sounds like progressive rock, or metal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.22.231 (talk) 02:15, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre
Talk:Lifesavas

message: Some possible sources: Village Voice review (2003), short review by Robert Christgau (2003). If someone can gather more, that might at least lay the groundwork for someone to expand this. - Jmabel | Talk 05:31, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really deserves expansion 
Talk:...But, I'm Your Teacher

message: * Boys on Boys on Film review - not sure if this is RS
* Sequential Tart review - should be RS
-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 04:12, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References for possible expansion
Talk:Different Drum

message: See Wall Street Journal feature on the song: "Linda Ronstadt's 'Different Drum'".--Artaxerxes (talk) 20:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: WSJ feature
Talk:Dig for Fire

message: how is the album version different from the ep version?74.97.241.234 (talk) 13:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  album/ep
Talk:Ding Dong Merrily on High

message: Is there really a comma at the end of the first line? "on high in heaven the bells are ringing" seems to make more sense to me, but I don't have access to a Woodward source. Mooncow 23:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that corrected lyrics have kindly been added by Dah31. Mooncow (talk) 01:19, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Punctuation

message: The article contains the following claim:
:: 'Note: "Swungen" and "Sungen" in the second verse, whilst correct English, are very often rendered into their more modern past-forms of "swung" and "sung" for performance today, which somewhat alters the balance of that verse.'
Is this really true? It seems an extraordinary thing to do, and I have never heard anything but the "swungen" and "sungen" forms despite having heard this carol sung many many times by many many choirs. Mooncow (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I came to ask the same thing. What does "correct" mean in this context? I would believe they are archaic past tenses, but that doesn't equal correct imo. Does anyone know?Yobmod (talk) 15:51, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics

message: I'm going to reinstate my bit about the Glo-o-…-o-ria but try to make it less POV (and add references (though I reckon one of them might have been copied from the other)).  (I originally got it from the article on Angels We Have Heard on High, where an almost identical line has stood unchallenged for over two years.)  As for AWHHoH, its line is IMHO exactly the same, except the end is different and it's shorter (and therefore not as good).—Dah31 (talk) 02:19, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Most memorable feature" 

message: Selected by whom? Why those ones in particular? What makes them particularly relevant? Does this section actually add anything useful to this article? Other than, of course, the obvious 'It's a popular carol - several people have sung it' :) --82.70.156.254 (talk) 02:25, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Selected recordings' 

message: made an edit whose summary stated, in part: "The lyrics were first published in 1924, which is after the Copyright Term Extension Act cutoff. Do not revert before January 1, 2020, unless you can find evidence that US copyright in the lyrics was not renewed."
(Emphasis mine.) So may the lyrics be restored now? If not this Wikipedia article, what other WMF project would be an appropriate place? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 00:19, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restore lyrics?
Talk:Dio vi salvi Regina

message: I noticed that User:Bornhj removed the full text of the Corsican national anthem because it was at Wiki source.  When an editor removes appropriate text like that, it is considered resonable to put the referential Template:wikisourcepar with the direct address into the article. (see 21 August 2005 edit by User:Uncle G)  In this case, however, there is a more specific guideline than the general rule of Wikipedia:Don't include copies of primary sources.  In fact within that very guideline is the statement: Some short texts such as short poems and national anthems are usually included in their article.  I have restored the first and last stanzas, and included the template. Signed: Bejnar 19:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Text of anthem
Talk:Allan Lichtman

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 04:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 

message: Read the introduction! Will you notice the errors with the brackets? --212.186.7.98 (talk) 07:10, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for correcting it. --212.186.7.98 (talk) 15:23, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brackets (done) 

message: In 2000 and 2016, did Lichtman really predict the popular vote winners or the total (electoral) winners of the elections? It isn't good sourced. --212.186.7.98 (talk) 10:32, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predictions
Talk:Walt Mossberg

message: I saw  this and was interested.
Someone needs to update this article. Mr. Mossberg now works for Fox Business. http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/television/news/e3if9ee4a7ba69317814e88cd14ce113472
(KingYaba (talk) 17:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would propose that a new section under the "All Things Digital" article be the main place for the conference, and that the redirect for the conference point to that instead of to this Walter Mossberg article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.85.37.118 (talk) 14:43, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  D: All Things Digital
Talk:Gift of Gab (rapper)

message: While Gift of Gab may indeed be a totally awesome rapper, this page is not very objective.  It paints a pretty glowing picture using as it sources, three articles from allmusic.com.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.179.54 (talk) 20:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objectivity? 

message: While most sources are reporting that he was 50 years old, no high-quality sources that I can find give his birth year as 1970. Any sources that specify his full birthdate give October 7, 1971. Presumably what's happened is that when his death was reported (for example by Billboard or NY Post) only his birth year (1971) was known to the reporter, who then incorrectly assumed he was 50, not realising his actual birthday was later in the year and that he was still 49 at the time of his death. Sources that specify his full birthdate: XXL, Guardian, and Rolling Stone, who all also contradict themselves by reporting his age as 50. - Forty.4 (talk) 14:57, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year
Talk:Parrott rifle

message: To all of the contributors of this project, your research and hard work has made my work much easier, allowing my own completion of the biggest project of the year! Thank you all so much! Xavotron (talk) 03:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thank you! 

message: The grid I put together uses the Union versions of the Parrott Rifles (since there were far fewer Confederate ones, and they were not nearly as standardized).  I am missing size/weight, munitions, and crew size info on several guns.  Anyone have that info?  
Also, any additional info that should be included in the box that isn't (or vice-versa)?  Thanks!  --BizMgr (talk) 19:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing info 

message: "The range and accuracy of the rifles startled the world. A 30-pounder
(4.2-inch) Parrott had an amazing carry of 8,453 yards with 80-pound" from Artillery Through the Ages: A Short Illustrated History of Cannon, Emphasizing Types Used in America by Albert Manucy, U.S. National Park Service as recorded at Bored.com/ebooks.  This is a great piece of info, but I can't seem to verify it.  I'm having trouble navigating the Gutenburg FTP listed at the end of that article to locate (and verify) the original.  Anyone more savvy at it?  Thanks!  --BizMgr (talk) 20:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gutenburg eBooks? 

message: I'm puzzled by the section "The 300 Pound Solution".  It says that by the summer of 1863, Maj. General William Sherman (linked to William Tecumseh Sherman) became frustrated with Fort Sumter and ordered in larger guns.  In 1863, General Sherman was a corps commander in the Vicksburg and Chattanooga campaigns in the west and had nothing to do with the siege of Fort Sumter.  The closest W.T. Sherman would come to Charleston in the war would be during the march through the Carolinas in 1864-65.  Perhaps the writer meant General Quincy A. Gillmore, mentioned later in the article?THoog (talk) 22:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sherman / Sumter? 

message: I guess the Hercules Gunship image on this page is a trolling attack. Should it be removed?195.39.226.70 (talk) 11:26, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hercules Gunship? 

message: After a recent visit to Ft. McHenry and seeing rifled muzzle-loading artillery there, I wonder how the projectiles were loaded. It seems there must have been an interference fit between the projectile and the bore for the rifling to be effective, but if there was how was the projectile rammed into place? That must have been REALLY hard on such a big gun. If someone has information on this point this might be a good article to add it to. --Deandavidv (talk) 23:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loading rifled cannon
Talk:Do You Hear What I Hear?

message: Will it be best if the copyrighted lyrics to the song were removed? The song is not yet in the public domain.Yip1982 09:40, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of copyrighted lyrics 

message: On a surface reading, the line “with a tail as big as a kite” is idiotic.  Is there some meaning of “kite” here besides
# a tethered flying fabric-covered frame
# a sort of ship's sail
# a carrion-eating bird
# a fraudulent financial instrument
If so, then the reader should be informed, to end bewilderment and to exonerate the composers. —SlamDiego←T 03:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is another possible explanation. A nuclear missile on launching has a kite-like vapour tail.101.98.175.68 (talk) 02:29, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  “a tail as big as a kite” 
Talk:Doin' Time

message: Anyone else notice the similarities to Sam Cooke's summertime? Nevermind.. its a cover of the Gershwin song my fault 138.88.33.11 (talk) 04:00, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sam Cooke

message: Looking over, this entire section seems problematic and the result of a BOLD edit / addition by a user.  It makes unsubstantiated claims such as, 'Shortly after the release of Del Rey's cover, a general consensus began to form among many critics who noted an evident interconnection between “Doin’ Time” and other Sublime songs and Del Rey's own songs.', goes on to provide general overview on Del Rey's career and output unrelated to the topic of the article, and in general seems like a very odd section to be in the article for the Sublime song. Just curious what other editors think in regards to the quality / content in this subsection. ThereWillBeTime (talk) 15:28, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lana Del Rey - Analysis Section