lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:.577/450 Martini–Henry

message: This doesn't seem to fit with the other contents of the Ammunition category.
Mike Wilson 22:51, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed it from Ammunition cat. Mike Wilson 07:39, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorisation

message: I would love to see some more information about the cartridge's use against dangerous game/wildlife. My great grandfather worked on a project to lay telegraph lines in Rhodesia in the early part of the 20th Century. A fellow Briton was attacked by a young lion during the night and my relative shot the creature just below the right eye socket with a .577 Martini Henry.  The lion dropped the man and turned on my relative. Fortunately, the lion was speared to death by native workers before it could inflict serious injury to him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.226.104.225 (talk) 20:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use on game 

message: The recoil from the blackpowder cartridge I had to order espcially is something! Wondered how Gurkas in british Armay handle this weapon!?BRANCUSIMOI (talk) 23:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have a Martini Heney Rifle  The recoil is something with this cartridge 

message: The recoil from the blackpowder cartridge I had to order espcially is something! Wondered how Gurkas in british Armay handle this weapon!?BRANCUSIMOI (talk) 23:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have a Martini Heney Rifle  The recoil is something with this cartridge 

message: Granted, I'm no "expert" but, I've always heard this round referred to as the .450/.577 Martini-Henry round.  How did the numbers get reversed?Al Lowe (talk) 14:39, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Early British cartridge designations are often this way around, (.500/450 Nitro Express, .450/400 Nitro Express, .400/350 Nitro Express etc), that is what they called it and what all of the sources still call it, it should not be swapped around. Cavalryman (talk) 06:33, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aren't the numbers reversed?  Shouldn't this be the .450/.577 Martini-Henry? 

message: Can/will somebody better at this than I/me please reverse/swap the numbers. It's confusing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.38.242 (talk) 04:48, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Early British cartridge designations are often this way around, (.500/450 Nitro Express, .450/400 Nitro Express, .400/350 Nitro Express etc), that is what they called it and what all of the sources still call it, it should not be swapped around. Cavalryman (talk) 06:33, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'll second that
Talk:2005 Jilin chemical plant explosions

message: I just wanted to thank everyone who's contributed to this article and found information and stuff...you've done way better than I have since I just did a tiny little thing at first which wasn't even that good. Keep up the good work! :) XYaAsehShalomX 22:58, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Talik

message: General Israel Tal is well known, probably more so, by his nickname, Talik. So a link here to the article about him is important for those who do not know his full name.
I do not know how to setup a redirection from  a single Talik page to two pages, one about Israel Tal and the other about the ground condition that is described in the current Talik page. I suspect that the current page needs to be moved or some other admin action needs to be taken. I leave this action to the administrator who monitors this page.
UriGeva 22:59, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spike (Peanuts)

message: Spike absolutely deserves his own article. He appeared with some regularity for the last 25 years of the strip. In all honesty, Snoopy's other siblings aren't any less important than Thibault, Peggy Jean, Lila and some other "Peanuts" characters with their own articles.Rockhopper10r 18:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging into "Snoopy's siblings"
Talk:Radioactive tracer

message: i belive this page is a a* and should be left as it is so far
^ an A* student, clearly  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.223.88.241 (talk) 17:06, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: i

message: This article was labelled as in need of expert attention. I have done a major revision. Petergans (talk) 09:00, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major revision 

message: Radioactive substance used in environment 2405:EC01:1001:75E1:D5F:391E:1C4:D8E7 (talk) 03:49, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physics
Talk:The Flirtations (R&B musical group)

message: Are those peak positions correct? I never remember hearing of them having bubbling under hits other than 'South Carolina' and perhaps 'Can't Stop Loving You' because it did chart in Cash box; and I would know.
Whoever put this info up, please e-mail me jmccoymoniz@comcast.net
--Jmccoymoniz
:According to some book(s) with Billboard chart positions, a lot of them are inaccurate and in fact lies. Unfortunately I have not seen this information with my own eyes, and I do not know the name of the publication(s), and albeit I doubt the person who told me this is lying, I simply cannot change the information at the time being, but I am working on it. I hope someone will get to it before me though. -- chsf, 21:42 CET, 2007-04-09
Check out this music rescearch site: http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?p=amg&token=ADFEAEE6791FD947AA7720E5A70C70E09A41DD2AF574DFA232146B6CF09A0368B42C5ECE73BBAAB2CCB610CF7FD29944DE2943D6D5ED49FEDC663A718CECAC613E344A03184538&sql=11:djfqxqrgldhe~T1 This link will take you to the Flirtations page and you can get chart information. I hope this helps out.  Austin WQMV
Sentences "It is ironic that these women were not more successful" and "'South Carolina' was a mere inferior ballad" warranted a neutrality tag.
130.240.194.169 14:03, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alleged chart success
Talk:Mount Lafayette

message: I added a link to a Web-based gallery of paintings of Mount Lafayette done by artists who painted in New Hampshire during the 19th century. JJ 23:13, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: I edited the name of the range to "Franconia Range", since that is used on all USGS and AMC maps & references I've seen where the range is named (eg, in the AMC White Mountain Guide) (though USGS GNIS, for example, lists "Franconia Ridge" but not "Franconia Range").  The article previously called it "Lafayette Range", which is a new one to me. Does anybody have a source that supports that name? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.45.242.3 (talk) 18:07, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The AMC White Mountain Guide is strong support for any names in the White Mountains.  I have 35+ years experience in the area, and I've never heard it called the "Lafayette Range."  It is the Franconia Range, and the valley between the Franconia Range and Cannon Mountain is called Franconia Notch.  So, I strongly support this change.  JJ 18:53, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  mountain box
Talk:Manzhouli

message: The following sentence was moved from the article:
:Manzhouli literally means "inside Manchuria".
滿洲-里 can technically be interpreted as "Manchuria<-inside" but I think it is just a rough transcription of Russian Маньчжурия.   --Nanshu 23:14, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: Is it 滿洲里 or 滿洲裏? — Instantnood 18:33, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Either way. 满洲里 is how it's actually spelled in simplified characters (which are the standard in PRC), while 滿洲裏 would be the same word written with the "traditional" form of the same characters, as it would be done in Taiwan or Hong Kong (and was done locally, too, until the 1950s or 1960s). -- Vmenkov (talk) 11:12, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 里 or 裏
Talk:National Comorbidity Survey

message: There needs to be an entry on this study!  Anyone involved in psychology knows about the NCS; I only have a small amt of information and don't have tons of time to improve this right now, but maybe this will spur other contributions.  Butcher away!  Katwmn6 23:14, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: There

message: Shouldn't this be moved to National Comorbidity Survey? Westfall 18:31, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hehe, done (only 2½ years late....) Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:43, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: move?

message: The dignostic interview used in the NCS was the CIDI, NOT the DIS. The whole point of using the CIDI was to do a national survey using the ICD criteia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Smiddy246810 (talk • contribs) 14:11, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagnositic interview
Talk:Peconic County, New York

message: This article was horribly POV in favor of Peconic County - it should be noted that a minority of people within the proposed Peconic County approve the separation. Certainly the nostalgic final section of the article was a travesty to the NPOV policy. - Cuivienen 23:16, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why are there all these locations that are not in the five eastern towns of Suffolk County listed in the "Places within the proposed county" chapter? ---------User:DanTD (talk)  01:55, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Places NOT within the proposed county
Talk:Prince Sverre Magnus of Norway

message: Note: until the baby's name was announced on the morning of December 5th, this page was located under the placeholder name "HRH Prince of Norway."
This must be a leading nominee for "dumbest name ever for an article." I'd VfD it except that, according to media reports, the whole thing will be settled by tomorrow. Doops |  talk 23:26, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have listed the painful old name at Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion. Doops |  talk 10:56, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Pre-move name

message: Do we really need both templates on this page?  It seems that the article gets lost in between all of the templates.  Prsgoddess187 12:53, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Templates 

message: Prince Sverre Magnus of Norway is now 16 months old and the image displayed on his page is still from the set of pictures released at the time of his birth. Granted it is adorable! But it would be nice to see a more up to date image of Sverre. There are some various pictures that were released on the family web site(www.kongehuset.no) from this past Christmas that might be a little better. A newer pic showing a growing toddler would be nice to see. Thanks! 
Aurora810 20:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Prince Sverre Magnus of Norway 
Talk:Reactant

message: I decided to move some of the information contained in reagent to here, so that the page for reactant contains the information for reactants (which can also be called reagents).  Feel free to leave a comment here or at Talk:Reagent. -- MJSkia1 23:27, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reactant/reagent split 

message: Redirecting "reactant" to "analytical reagent" ie subclass of it is unfortunate. We have a page Product (chemistry), we need a page Reactant too. Taylor 49 (talk) 12:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad redirect
Talk:Kent School District

message: This section has become huge compared the rest of the article. It should either be scaled down or ,ade into it's own article. FastFoodKnight 23:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lawsuits 

message: This section of the Kent School District article provides a one-sided view of the case concerning Mark Iversen and sexual harassment directed against him. Since Wikipedia is encyclopedic in nature, articles should refrain from the use of generalities in place of facts. One such example is "He was pushed into lockers with a broomstick and called 'fag' while two teachers sat by and did nothing." That the teachers "sat by and did nothing" is an interpretation of the event. It is possible that there were two teachers who actually watched the event as it transpired, and it is also possible that there were two teachers who were merely nearby during the event and did not realize that it was happening. The purpose of the section should not be to make accusations but to present facts.
KillerOfThem 02:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality of "Mark Iversen vs. Kent School District et al" 

message: The National School Board Association visited the Kent School District, should this be stated in the article?
--onekopaka (talk) 16:46, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NSBA Visit 

message: I don't know if the picture of the boy is real or has been put there as a joke. I have seen this picture featured on both the wikipedia pages for 'Down's Syndrome' and 'Drill'. The fact that the caption reads 'down syndrome' and that it seems so arbitrary is why I suggested that its existence on the page be reconsidered. I see no references. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.254.56.79 (talk) 19:45, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of boy with drill

message: Kentwood high school is completely missing from the list of schools 9-12. Needs to be added.
165.123.205.123 (talk) 02:07, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kentwood 

message: Do you think we should add the Tosh.0 thing that happened at Kentridge, or not?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ALonelyWeeaboo (talk • contribs) 19:21, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tosh.0 thing? 

message: The list of schools should include The Outreach Program (TOP).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.121.54.243 (talk) 01:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Outreach Program 

message: As of summer 2021, Kent Mountain View Academy was demolished to make room for River Ridge Elementary School and Grandview School. Should we add this information? Also, Kent Labratory Academy succeeded both Kent Mountain View Academy and Kent Phoenix Academy (the latter of which Sequoia Middle School was temperorarily known as).
Evope (talk) 00:45, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kent Mountain View Academy
Talk:Ng (disambiguation)

message: Seems to be the more common use in articles that need redirection so why not have the dab article there?  Vegaswikian 05:54, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move from [[Ng (disambiguation)]] to [[NG]]

message: *This follows Disambiguation, Generic topic. Since this move follows a guideline, I'm not creating a voting subheading. If anyone opposes, please feel free to create a subheading! --Lox (t,c) 18:54, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: What's "ng" mean in "ng/mL" like the content of a substance amount in a drug screen (as my own results appear)? I know mL is milliliters, but what is ng? 4.255.51.216 (talk) 03:58, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nanograms (5th line of NG) – see also nanogram, 10-9 grams. -- Hebrides (talk) 05:27, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ng/mL
Talk:Piper J-3 Cub

message: While the military history of the Piper J-3 Cub is certainly important and should be covered, I wonder if the article in its current form puts a little too much emphasis on this aspect and not enough on the aircraft's civil usage? After all, that was the Cub's main purpose. During most of its career, it was thought of as a really basic light training aircraft, not as an observation warbird. In particular, I notice that the military slant starts with the infobox picture by showing a version in World War II military colors. I'd think a photo of a standard yellow civil Cub would be more appropriate there. -- Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 06:32, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The longer prose military coverage is understandable as there isn't much to say about a touring/training general aviation aircraft unless it was involved in something notable like setting a world record. The Piper PA-28 Cherokee article has no operational history section, probably for the same reason. One alternative would be to split the article, moving the military content into the redirect at Piper L-4 Grasshopper but this article is not large enough to be split on size alone and other editors would call for it to be merged back in to this J-3 article. The J-3 and L-4 are effectively the same aircraft type with different paint schemes. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 11:57, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not enough emphasis on Cub's civil usage? 

message: The picture for this article; while really good, is of an L-4 Cub. I think that the picture can be misleading to people who click on the article, as the article name specifically says "Piper J-3 Cub". I do still think that the article should include pictures of the L-4, just not as the head picture (if that is the right term).
I would be happy to capture an image of a J-3 Cub if needed, although there are many available on Wikimedia Commons.
BenjaminWoolliscroft (talk) 02:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree that the lede image should be an actual civilian J-3. It was at one time, but was changed a while back. - Ahunt (talk) 14:35, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The infobox name could be changed to J-3 Cub/L-4 Grasshopper, the latter name redirects here. It's commonly done when there are civilian and military variants that are mentioned in the lead (bolded in this case). There's probably more than one J-3 out there that has been converted to an L-4 by painting it green! Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 15:05, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I think that the picture for this article should be changed.
Talk:Battle of La Roche-Derrien

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 06:05, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:04, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Should this article be Start without references or citations?--DThomsen8 (talk) 19:10, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start without references or citations? 

message: The article's last paragraph or section declares that "The battle features in Bernard Cornwell's historical novel Vagabond—part of his Grail Quest trilogy ... A related account can be found in his book "Harlequin"".  
Not so. There were two battles, the first in "Harlequin" is set some time before the events of "Vagabond", which post-dates the Battle of Crécy. 
Cornwall relates in a historical note that in the first battle the Earl of Northampton took the town by escalade (direct attack using ladders to cross the walls). The second battle went much as as the article (and the historical note in Vagabond) describe.  222.154.87.53 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 06:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  There were two battles
Talk:Battle of Auberoche

message: What the heck is going on? I think the reader should be given a caption explaining the image, not just alt-text. Mattximus (talk) 23:48, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image needs a caption 

message: Just because you change it in writings doesn't mean that's how it was. History is there to learn from so we can do batter next time and learn from our mistakes. If you keep changing everything how are we suppose to show are children what works and what doesnt? We need all of our past to make a better future. KileyMitchell79 (talk) 20:35, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History rewritten is FICTION not FACT 

message: The article contains the following, "Before the war commenced well over 1,000 ships a year departed Gascony. Among their cargoes were over  of wine. (refs: Rodger 2004 pp=xix–xx, 79; Curry 2002 p=40)", which has been copy/pasted into a number of articles. I have edited it because it is wrong in several ways; it is OR, relies on a synthesis of the sources, and gives the wrong amount anyway. This was discussed at length a couple of years ago, but the wrong information is still here, so I have fixed it, here and elsewhere. Moonraker12 (talk) 17:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much wine?
Talk:Battle of Sarmin

message: In my humble opinion this article would make more sense if called "Seljuk Invasion of 1115" or "The Sarmin Camapaign" or something similar. Mainly because the actual battle was only a tiny part of the events, most of which were the actions of the two sides in the invasion, including two separate mobilizations of the Frankish armies. Thoughts? Cheers --Tefalstar (talk) 20:24, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A rename
Talk:Battle of Marj al-Saffar (1126)

message: I put the "tactical success" back in and made it a quote and footnoted it. I changed Muslim victory to Muslim strategic victory. I think we all agree on that! Smail seems convinced that it was a local Crusader tactical victory, so I'm going with his judgment. Pyrrhic victories happen (e.g., Battle of Guilford Court House) and I believe this battle fits the description. Djmaschek (talk) 02:37, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Can someone show me where in this book, Western Warfare in the Age of the Crusades, 1000-1300 By John France, pg. 220, does it say Muslim victory for the battle of Marj es-Suffar? Thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:26, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muslim victory