Talk:RMS Rhone

message: * Added pictures of the wreck that I took. Added a new page in Commons with 15 pictures of the wreck. Added a link to the new Commons page. Jetlife2 (talk) 17:56, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am placing a citation tag on the claim that the Royal Navy declared both the Rhone and the Titanic unsinkable.  Titanic was, afaik, only declared unsinkable in the press due to a misquote from the builders, and I am not aware of the Royal Navy inspecting and making such claims for merchant marine vessels. DiverScout (talk) 10:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsinkable

message: Surely the Millwall Iron Works were on the River Thames in London, not Southampton? --Robkam (talk) 01:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Millwall Iron Works

message: The anchor does NOT lie in Great Harbour. It was picked up by Saba Rock Divers and it now lies in the Saba Rock fish tank, on Saba Rock. The Rhone left Southampton on October 2nd and arrived in the B.V.I on October 29th. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.101.50.223 (talk • contribs) 
:I am afraid you are mistaken my friend.  The anchor which Capt Woolley ordered cut remains where it lay in Great Harbour along with a considerable length of the chain, and is buried under several feet of coral; only parts of the flukes and part of one of the stocks remain visible.  You can still dive it and see it with scuba gear today.  If perchance anyone ever does get ever it out, it will require dynamite.   It would also be a criminal offence to remove it as a historically protected site, although I don't discount the possibility that Bert Kilbride (original owner of Saba Rock and former HM Receiver of Wreck in the BVI) may have removed one of the spare anchors from the Rhone before it was a protected site back in 60s. --Legis (talk - contribs) 19:00, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Background Information

message: At the end of the article, it states that "hundreds of tourists" visit the Rhone every day.  I've been to the Rhone several times (in high season) and never witnessed more than a dozen or so divers on the wreck at any given time.  Even with snorklers and casual boaters, I doubt the number reaches "hundreds" every day.  I think it would be more accurate to say "visited by tourists everyday" since there is no way to state just how many tourists visit the site every day.
12.71.173.2 (talk) 11:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hundreds of Tourists? 

message: Due to her mast sticking out of the water, and her shallow depth, she was deemed a hazard by the Royal Navy in the 1950s and her stern section was blown apart. Does anyone have any photos of that? They would be great for the article. Also, a photo of the original intact ship. I'm assuming some exist...? --RThompson82 (talk) 02:31, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Old photos???

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on RMS Rhone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150711182236/http://www.bvitourism.com/activity/rms-rhone-marine-park to http://www.bvitourism.com/activity/rms-rhone-marine-park
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified