lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ōta Nanpo

message: ==Untitled==
*Note: Please do not move this page to "Nanpo". As according to WP:MOS, the more common romanization is used here. Ota Nampo got 500+ hits on Google, while Ota Nanpo got 200+. I have personally, in my experience, only ever seen Nampo, never Nanpo used. Thank you. LordAmeth 10:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: *Note: Please do not move this page to "Nanpo". As according to WP:MOS, the more common romanization is used here. Ota Nampo got 500+ hits on Google, while Ota Nanpo got 200+. I have personally, in my experience, only ever seen Nampo, never Nanpo used. Thank you. LordAmeth 10:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Black-headed grosbeak

message: There is a contradiction between the statement that this species is accidental south of Mexico and the map which shows both the breeding and wintering  ranges apparently extending beyond the southern boundary of the map.
The comments seem to be taken from Stiles and Skutch. Perhaps the range has expanded since the guide was published? Nicaraguan Grackle and Melodious Blackbird, for example, are both now resident in Costa Rica. Any thoughts?jimfbleak 10:33, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Range
Talk:European Pharmacopoeia

message: Article states 1967 to be the year of release, yet the linked source says 1969. 
Typo? --93.228.128.37 (talk) 20:56, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of first Release 

message: This page is in a sorry state!  It's rather incoherent, and needs to be re-written, including the legal status of the document. --Slashme 10:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fix this page

message: In the Article Pharmacopeia an extra section for the Ph. Eur. could be added. In other languages like german these are already merged. Vollgesund (talk) 19:27, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion: Merge this article with Pharmacopeia
Talk:1889 Apia cyclone

message: The article has several spots of POV, for example: were very keen to exploit the situation in order to expand their holdings in the Pacific... the result was a catastrophe... etc., just clean it up a little, and it could be a very good article... - Adolphus79 10:38, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alas, [  the result] of this comment is tht the then enthusiastic and hyperbolic text was toned down but not corrected.  It now gives a wholly misleading impression, of straightforward (though unsourced) fact.  In reality it is largely free speculation (at best OR). 2A04:B2C2:405:EB00:5529:18FB:276F:1A8B (talk) 22:19, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Inline sourcing. Hurricanehink (talk) 19:41, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And correct organization. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 18:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo
Talk:High Knob

message: The claims, such as High Knob being a "massif" or the name "High Knob Landform" have not been documented by official sources, such as the USGS. Most of these claims have only recently come about, mainly due to one local advocacy group (The Clinch Coalition) using it to promote their environmental agenda and are mostly not based on published sources but rather in the author's own opinion.
Also, much of the article incorporates opinions and other information that, while related to the overall geographic area and the goals of the group, does not really pertain to this particular subject i.e. references to "The Cedars" and "Unthank Cave" which are located over 30 miles away from the subject of this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.67.157.114 (talk) 08:40, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed 

message: The article includes an external reference to a 2007 newspaper report in the Kingsport Times-News, but then warns that
 *** www.timesnews.net has a Google Advisory for being a malicious website ***
Checking Google here shows no advisory for that Website for the present or for the previous 90-day period, so I'm going to drop the warning text.
50.181.30.121 (talk) 17:47, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google malicious website advisory 

message: Since revision 501321150, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=High_Knob&diff=next&oldid=501321150 there is an incomplete sentence: it reads "it represents the 'pivot point' of the [3] (first described in notable detail during the 1920s and 1930s by geologists Charles Butts and John Rich)." So... of the what?
I'm at work and don't have time to research the subject to modify the page. Can someone please take care of it? Thanks!
24.37.29.254 (talk) 16:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Of the what?
Talk:Stalking (disambiguation)

message: The page should be deleted by my understanding of WP:DAB (which is pretty complicated, but anyhow).  The previous content  contained no items requiring disambiguation - they were candidates for stalk (disambiguation) perhaps, but not stalking.  This page does not appear to require disambiguation, at best deer stalking and game stalker could have hatnote links to stalking itself.  I would normally redirect, that would be my second choice, but it seems odd to think someone would type in stalk (disambiguation).  Who looks for a DAB page?  WLU (t) (c) (rules - simple rules) 16:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Lucky Wander Boy

message: are terrible  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.195.84.9 (talk) 18:58, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  formatting and content of this article
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-05-29/Technology report

message: I recall reading in one of the mailing lists this week that the "URL normalization" fix was backed out. – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 10:57, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

message: They don't seem fixed… Check these out:
They look good in galleries though:
Jon Harald Søby 15:27, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Animated thumbs
Talk:EMI (disambiguation)

message: Shouldn't this page be linked to when EMI is searched for? Not the record company?
Reedy Boy 11:00, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i think you are correct reedy boy. Covalent 18:19, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: EMI

message: isnt this just clutter when there is not even an article on the song? Covalent 18:21, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sex pistols song
Talk:Gymnastics at the Summer Olympics

message: I've added a few starting sentences. Much more work needed. At least "Competition", "History", "Medals", "Qualification" sections should be present, like in other similar articles. And tables of events look as if there were no events held in the past 100 years... Cmapm 11:20, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've slapped a few  templates on there.  As for text, more would be great.  Probably be a while before I get to it though. -- Jonel | Speak 12:06, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the quick response. Perhaps, later I'll return back to expanding this article too. Cmapm 12:21, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sections

message: What do the numbers represent in the "Nations" table? I don't think it's obvious at the moment. -- ratarsed (talk) 18:28, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Number of gymnasts the nation brought to that Games. Obviously, everything after 1920 is still missing. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 00:55, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is totally uninteresting. I propose to delete the whole section on grounds of incompleteness and pointlessness for the effort. Unless someone is going to complete the links to provide the names of every single Olympian, I don't see a reason to keep this. 128.122.91.47 (talk) 23:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  See (and comment at) Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Olympics#Nations tables in some Olympic sport articles. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 23:52, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Gymnastics at the Summer Olympics#Nations|Nations section]] 

message: There's no note at Triathlon at the Summer Olympics about this past event, nor at Triathlon or Triathlon (disambiguation), there's no article for gymnastic triathlon... so what is it? 70.51.11.210 (talk) 05:49, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Gymnastics at the 1904 Summer Olympics - Men's triathlon should have that info now. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 06:27, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  triathlon? 

message: Could someone explain why the team sizes keep shrinking? In 1996, there were seven-person teams, as recently as 2008 there were six-person teams, and now it's apparently down to five people per team. What's up with that? Tad Lincoln (talk) 03:54, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not official, but this explanation is basically that the total number of gymnasts is fixed by the IOC at 98 (i.e., 98 men and 98 women in artistic gymnastics), and FIG has shrunk the team size to allow more individual competitors--instead of 72 slots taken up by teams, now only 60 are. -- Jonel (Speak to me) 04:12, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Size 

message: It is fun 174.240.48.60 (talk) 23:08, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bars
Talk:Lights in the Dusk

message: Can someone provide an English translation of the title, please? Thanks.  -- Visviva 12:11, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Valot = lights, and laitakaupunki refers to the outskirts of a town, so I translated it as "Lights of the Outskirts". –Mysid(t) 12:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The film is usually referred to as Lights in the Dusk in English, though. –Mysid(t) 06:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I changed the name of the article from the Finnish title to the English one as per naming conventions for foreign language films. The Finnish title remains in the first sentence to indentify the film's original name. SWik78 (talk) 14:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  English title vs. Finnish title
Talk:Outlaws (1997 video game)

message: What? No one is here? Ok. can someone please tell where i can find it on MSN?? Elncid (talk) 08:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand the question, but Outlaws is an old game, so it's doubtful MSN would have any info. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:05, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  In the article it says I can find the game on the MSN Gaming Zone. So, me being new I was wondering how I can find it on MSN Zone, 'coz I tried it and it turned up nothing. Elncid (talk) 18:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone home?

message: Are voxels used for the environment? it seemed to me that the did but i may be wrong.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordgod666 (talk • contribs) 09:29, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Definitely no voxels.  - Richfife (talk) 23:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Voxels?

message: Outlaws is a PC game, diffrent than a video game. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 15:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonsense; go read Video game 121.223.243.95 (talk) 15:54, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Outlaws is not a video Game

message: In the Infobox, the "Platform(s)" field specifies "PC".  I think that the "Platform(s)" field should specify a value or values from the " Supported platforms" section of the  Vgclegend template.  For example, if Outlaws (1997 video game) only runs on MS-DOS, then Outlaws (1997 video game)'s Infobox should specify "DOS" in the "Platform(s)" field.
ProResearcher (talk) 14:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: I feel the source for the zipped maps should be used as Molycoat was the one who created them up until the end. If you download any of those files, and have the game Outlaws then you can play the maps. There was a dedicated platform for those who continued to play outlaws from around 2002 to 2012 called "Warzone". At the very least it should be included as an external link along with Paleface as these are the only ways people can play the extended levels. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 03:13, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been the standard not to include any sort of mod downloads or to showcase mods unless they have coverage from reliable media. per Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources#Fansites these typically have no editorial oversight, and are often self-published sources. Additionally WP:ELNO states to exclude "Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites (negative ones included), except those written by a recognized authority." It's annoying, but I want to get this article to GAN, and it won't pass with that. A quick Google search of Outlaws custom maps covers what people need, so they can still find the content. If you disagree I suggest we consult Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games to get more opinions. --Teancum (talk) 18:29, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay exclude it, the link doesn't lead to a personal blog though or the like. The only content there are useful maps that people can download which cant be accessed anymore by a straightforward google search. The Outlaw Dad has his maps, but not all of them. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:48, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Molycoat
Talk:A Matter of Customs

message: unarguably a needlessly long-winded article Chensiyuan 09:34, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:After Burner III

message: If the game was originally Strike Fighter, and "After Burner III" was the lazy cash grab rename, then the article should be titled Strike Fighter. 2804:D4B:79C1:9800:D98F:181F:B8C4:C99E (talk) 23:30, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be Strike Fighter
Talk:Reduced vertical separation minima

message: Removed 'in China' from the metres conversion as many countries use metres, including China, Russia and some Eastern European countries. Also removed paragraph re critics, as there is no reference to any critics and no reference to any response to critics. I've never heard of any notable critics to RVSM, it can stay out until anyone references otherwise.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.171.9.229 (talk) 11:41, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: China

message: Surely the word "Domestic" relates to the US's plan to go RVSM?  Elsewhere this has simply been called "Reduced Vertical Separation Minima" (or Minimums).
I propose that the article be renamed to remove the word "Domestic" on internationalization grounds.BaseTurnComplete 11:47, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Domestic
Talk:Sheikh (Sufism)

message: The article should have a section on the use of the word in sufism; the whole article is not about sufism (as the first line indicates). Accordingly, the name of the article should be changed. Or maybe the intention was to emphasise the term 'Shaykh' in Sufism and mention that the word 'Shaykh' has other uses in the Arabic language ? Let's try and clear up the confusion :). Thanks. MP   (talk) 11:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: It states that in order for an individual to become a certified or qualified sheikh he must be a Sunni Muslim....this is incorrect, there are many who are Shi'a. Stop being partisan, whoever said you must be Sunni? Where is reference?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.80.104.182 (talk) 05:44, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: qualifications?

message: The usage of  is up for discussion, see Talk:Ed Farhat -- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 06:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|The Sheik}}"
Talk:Legal maxim

message: possibly add pages/links with some legal maxims
I note there is also a page on the Maxims of Equity.  Probably the two articles should be merged as Maxims, Legal and Equitable.  MCTWSF 23:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

message: 1. Does legal maxim have legal status in civil law jurisdictions ? 
2. What is the place of legal maxim within the hierachy of common law jurisdiction ?
Siyac 13:46, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: Waiver of any kind of non stop reservation confirmed fare is rs and the same so just wanted to let you know that we can already visualize myself flipping the switch and script to be honest with you don't mind games terms and conditional sentences pending further investigation by Blizzard entertainment's employees and customers websites top in search engines optimization services at modest rate and comment on this device was discovered by law or may not be an issue for some reason I am excited to see you soon ☺️🔜🦜❤️ 2001:569:7E1D:DD00:1749:D795:A110:4D58 (talk) 22:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waiver of any kind of non stop reservation confirmed fare is rs and the same so just wanted to let you know that we can already visualize myself flipping the switch and script to be honest with you don't mind games terms and conditional sentences pending further investigation by Blizzard entertainment's employees and customers websites top in search engines optimization services at modest rate and comment on this device was discovered by law or may not be an issue for some reason I am excited to see you soon ☺️🔜🦜❤️
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/What Really Happened

message: Whatreallyhappened.com has a post up that says:
:Wikipedia considers deleting the entry for What Really Happened Posted May 29, 2006 08:00 PM PST
:Do let them know how you feel about that. ''
Tom Harrison Talk 12:16, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Is Wikipedia for censorship?  Whatreallyhappened.com obviously gets plenty of hits, has a reasonably high ranking, has a fairly well-known author, and is part of American (Blog) Culture.  Why don't we just get rid of the entries for Michael Jackson, Stalin, Bush, Gore, Mao and Madonna while we're at it?  Aren't they also controversial?  If Wikipedia becomes just another highly-regimented, censored site, with nothing to offer but pristine little entries that follow the 1950's party line, I say we all boycott Wikipedia.  There are other dictionaries on-line, you know.  Ed in Dallas.
69.149.57.193 23:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dear Ed, the entries for Michael Jackson, Stalin, Bush, Gore, Mao and Madonna should not be controversial, because they are written with WP:NPOV. Though as the nom as said repeatedly, that is not at all the reason for the deletion. Also, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Also, "vote" on the main page, not the talk page. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 01:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  KEEP!  Why is this even a Question???! 

message: :Add any additional comments
* Bizarre new convention, which broke the possibility of editing the current AfD until I reverted the move from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Really Happened (2nd nomination) to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/What Really Happened — Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 18:21, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Olšany Cemetery

message: Should this not be changed to a plural form: Olšany cemeteries? There are two afterall. -- TheMightyQuill 12:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is single unit growing "organically", with ten parts. I'd keep it as it is to avoid confusion. Someone who fills this skinny wretch with details may do it later. Pavel Vozenilek 05:01, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?
Talk:Gnucleus

message: I just changed the spelling of servent to servant. I haven't been able to find a reason it was spelt servent.
---
I was wrong. I learnt about servents. I'll change it back.
---
I don't know if this is relavant or not, or if it is true, but it seems that Gnucleus has been abandoned as no sorce files have been updated in the CVS tree for almost over a year now. This should probably be investigated.  -Mtekk 13:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just downloaded gnucleus 1.8.6.0., update via  gnucleus.net failes. cache data and host server in preferences was too old. Got it running by adding/picking nodes from a site on the net(h**p://g2.tjtech.org/g2/?showhosts=1&net=all). 
Now i wonder: how can i check if i am connected to G1, G2 or both?? As far as i can tell from extended info they r all gnutella1(limewire) I am  abit dubious of the claim of G2 support. --Echosmoke (talk) 04:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: just "found" the 2.0.2.0 release on sourceforge - its rather well hidden as h**p://www.gnucleus.com/Gnucleus/ redirects to the 1.8.6. release --Echosmoke (talk) 05:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  so 1.8.6.0. does not support G2, 2.0.2.0 does. internal update worked after 3rd attempt. Seems the newest release is 2.2.0.0 - update article? --Echosmoke (talk) 05:34, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I wagered this would be just an accidental twist in the numbers, but I was wrong! The 2.2.0.0 is a NETWORK-ONLY update. For some ugly reason, you cannot download 2.2.0.0 directly. -andy 92.230.16.207 (talk) 18:31, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  still works
Talk:The Possibility and the Promise

message: In the personnel section of the album liner notes, one of the lines is this:
:Gang vocals on Tracks 1 & 7 by: Adrian, Davy, & Alex B. of Truce, Wil and Nick of Aiden, The All Mighty Rick and Kelly of Lucky for Nothing, and Bradly.
I had started writing it in the article like this:
:Additional gang vocals on "Everything We Were Has Become What We Are" and "The Right to Write Me Off" by Adrian, Davy Rispoli, and Alex Budinich of Truce; Wil Francis and Nick Wiggins of Aiden
but I couldn't find the last names of Adrian, either of those people from Lucky for Nothing, or whoever Bradly is. (The closest I got was that someone named Bradly Miranda did the engineering on The Turn, but it seems likely to me that that's not the same person.) Is there a way to properly include that line in the article or should it just be left out? Gendermastervodka (talk) 23:39, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Gang vocals" in personnel section?
Talk:Parallel bars

message: I've removed the following unreferenced excerpt:
Alternate Dimensions:
*2    inches thick   (oval)
*11.5 feet long 
*6.5  feet high      (adjustable)
*16.5 inches apart   (adjustable)
Feel free to cite your sources for it and then paste it back into the article. Cmapm 12:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled