Talk:Harry Hill's TV Burp

message: I have removed the following section from the introduction to the article:
"This type of format was pioneered by the US E! network's Talk Soup and subsequently The Soup but on a smaller scale. "
I have done this for several reasons. Firstly, this seems like nothing more than opinion to me, secondly, the claim has been unsubstantiated since last month, and thirdly, google hits turn up nothing except more comparisons made on forums etc. Nowhere has Harry Hill or anyone connected with TV Burp claimed that Talk Soup or The Soup are inspirations for the show, something which I'd assume would be necessary to include reference to these shows in the introductory paragraph for TV Burp.
If independent sources can be provided which show that the American shows were inspiration for TV Burp then this should probably be mentioned further down in the article, but not in the introduction. If no such sources can be found, I think the most these shows deserve is a link at the bottom of the article in the "see also" section. Reidlophile (talk) 20:08, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsubstantiated opinion

message: I am having difficulty understanding what is being described in the second para. Can someone rephrase it for people who have not seen the show? E.g., who is "he"? Is it Hill? Metamagician3000 10:34, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarity

message: tonight? (6th december) --91.105.66.230 (talk) 19:44, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Times 

message: If anybody doesn't mind me asking this, was there actually a Christmas special for this year? I mean, I thought there was one today but it turns out it was the Review of the Year. The Christmas special must've been last week and I didn't realise it. Could anyone help me out in this? --Burai (talk) 19:58, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, so there won't be a Christmas special like it had in the past two years? Might as well make that edit then. --Burai (talk) 14:07, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christmas special 2008? 

message: I noticed an edit on the article that a ninth series commenced yesterday, and I don't think it's true. The eighth series is still going, even though it was on a four-week hiatus for The Best Of TV Burp to temporarily fit in. I've reverted that edit anyway, as everyone else would know the eighth series is still going despite this. --Burai (talk) 21:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ninth season? 

message: I think that this article really needs re-writing, the huge lists of bullet points are unnecesary.
Is anyone willing to help me on this daunting task. --Etincelles (talk) 11:10, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This needs a sub-page or similar to work around to fix the said section. --Yowuza yadderhouse |meh 16:03, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Re-write 

message: The individual in question keeps filling the article with a list of near every joke/sketch that appears in the current series week by week. I've reverted it several times but he/she persists. The recurring jokes listings is able to appear because it's part of the show's trademark humour and is carefully managed so only the noteable incidents are referenced. These wider additions are just cluttering the article with bad explantions of jokes which make no sense out of context.--HellCat86 (talk) 22:41, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem- Class74fan

message: The entire page reads like a combination of PR and a fan site. It really isn't very "wiki" at all. Even the "Reception" section seems to imply that Hill's show is universally popular and I note that one previous negative criticism of Hill's humour was deleted. I have now added one negative review to that section, which is sourced. Another issue is notability. Obviously a networked TV show is notable enough to justify a page - but whether that justifies an episode by episode account of every single series is another matter. --Archstanton (talk) 11:34, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopaedic content, lack of neutrality 

message: I think that the article contains too much unessicary information, that is unfinished. I think these sections should be made into separate articles, or deleted. An example of this is the ratings. I feel that it should include the ratings of all the series, or should just show each series as a whole. I also feel that the characters section needs to be expanded, as some characters  have great descriptions, whereas most have none  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drinkdrinker (talk • contribs) 22:38, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is unfinished 

message: Starting with "series" 9, each "series" has a two-month break in the middle.  It was my understanding that these were considered separate series by the network / production company.
Also, are these episode counts skipping the "Best Of" episodes?  According to my records, Best Of TV Burp 10 first aired March 27, 2010, and Best Of TV Burp 11 aired April 3, 2010, but neither of these airings are listed.  --Larry Hastings (talk) 17:04, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who numbered the series? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Harry Hill's TV Burp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221083606/http://harryhill.wordpress.com/2009/10/10/tv-burp-available-on-itv-player/ to http://harryhill.wordpress.com/2009/10/10/tv-burp-available-on-itv-player/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140201204122/http://www.avalonuk.com/shows/view/23 to http://www.avalonuk.com/shows/view/23
*Added  tag to http://www.tv-burp.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140201204122/http://www.avalonuk.com/shows/view/23 to http://www.avalonuk.com/shows/view/23
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:02, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified