lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Yuanshan, Yilan

message: I've figured that User:Taiwanlove edits exactly like User:Nationalist.--Jerrypp772000 00:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been confirmed that Taiwanlove is a sock puppet of Nationalist. That's why they edit in a similar way!--Jerrypp772000 22:09, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Taiwanlove

message: / and , even though similar discussion are also going on in Talk:Jhunan, Miaoli and Talk:Guantian, Tainan, but I want to explain this to you all in case you forget. Technically, both Taiwan and ROC, not Taiwan, ROC though, would work here, but Taiwan would be more appropriate because of the WP:NC (common names) and also because it is less confusing. Plus, this city or township is located on the island of Taiwan anyways.
I understand that the naming conventions for Chinese say it should be ROC (Taiwan) or Taiwan (ROC), which are fine for me, but I think it is my right to ignore those naming conventions if those conventions would make this confusing. However, if you have to be stubborn, and not reasonable, I might be able report you but I won't, since Taiwan (ROC) is fine, Taiwan only is just better. But at least give the reason why you don't like Taiwan, Taiwan (ROC), or ROC (Taiwan). Thanks.--Jerrypp772000 22:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Keep it cool. Yeah, I mean, if you have a good reason, go ahead. But do you have the reason to ignore the third opinion given in Talk:Guantian, Tainan?--Jerrypp772000 22:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So yeah, obviously User:Nationalist didn't have any good reasons for ignoring the naming conventions for common names and the third opinion in Talk:Guantian, Tainan. And since no one else disagreed with me, I would change it back to Taiwan only. If anyone wants to add (ROC), that would be fine. Otherwise, please discuss first. Thanks.--Jerrypp772000 22:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Okay, now I see that Sid212 is a confirmed sock puppet of Nationalist. I think it is kind of weird that Nationalist would do anything to edit these articles without discussion in the talk pages. I mean if he thinks he's right, he should discuss and let us know what he thinks and stuff. And now there's , who might be another sock puppet of his.--Jerrypp772000 18:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So now I'm kind of confused. I think , or , , and , are the only editor who disagree with using Taiwan only. But they wouldn't discuss.--Jerrypp772000 23:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan
Talk:Wurih

message: Why may not to singing at Wikipedia, such national anthem and below:
五月天～戀愛ｉｎｇ
詞：阿信 曲：阿信
陪你熬夜　聊天到爆肝也沒關係　陪你逛街　逛成扁平足也沒關係
超感謝你　讓我重生　整個o-r-z　讓我重新認識ｌｏｖｅ（ｌ－ｏ－ｖ－ｅ！ｌ－ｏ－ｖ－ｅ！）
戀愛ｉｎｇ　ｈａｐｐｙ　ｉｎｇ　心情就像是　坐上一台噴射機
戀愛ｉｎｇ　改變ｉｎｇ　改變了黃昏　黎明　有你　都心跳到不行（黃昏　黎明　整個都戀愛ｉｎｇ）
你是空氣　但是好聞勝過了空氣　你是陽光　但是也能照進半夜裡
水能載舟　也能煮粥　餵飽了生命　你就是維他命ｌｏｖｅ（ｌ－ｏ－ｖ－ｅ！ｌ－ｏ－ｖ－ｅ！）
未來某年某月某日某時某分某秒某人某地某種永遠的心情　不會忘記此刻ｌｏｖｅl
ｌ－ｏ－ｖ－ｅ！ｌ－ｏ－ｖ－ｅ！ｌ－ｏ－ｖ－ｅ！ｌ－ｏ－ｖ－ｅ！Roded86400 02:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Outfit (video game)

message: The Outfit's engine isn't "HydraCore". In fact, I've worked on it and I've never heard that word. The engine was based on an early version of the Company of Heroes engine (their prototype, in fact) and was heavily customized for the Xbox 360.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.79.16.161 (talk) 09:54, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine 
Talk:Tian Gang

message: The  tag here resulted from an OTRS email request.  The complaint was: POV problem with possibly undue weight being given to a "controversy" section. Mangojuicetalk 14:05, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What's the current affiliation of Professor Tian?It seems he works full-time for Princeton and Part-time for Peking University,right?Rezameyqani (talk) 10:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professor Tian current affiliation
Talk:Crosswords DS

message: Would anyone have any idea how to obtain ANY sales information for this title? - A Link to the Past (talk) 18:02, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Gamasutra reports it placed 6th for DS games in its launch week in the UK. See link. ~ Hibana 02:55, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sales
Talk:Taitung City

message: * Object to RMTR speedy move the target was a disambiguation page for 8 years, until the nominator changed this into a redirect in 2015, and the topic's Chinese name uses "市" (city); as it was a bold conversion without discussion, this hasn't been determined to be a primary topic either. -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 05:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:10, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from RMTR speedy move
Talk:Eye of the Beholder (film)

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: There's a little-known, but real film called "Eye of the Beholder" starring Richard Conte and Martha Vickers from 1953. It's a 23-minute long educational film, frequently shown in psychology classes in the 1970s. It seems like there should be some indication or reference to the previous work. The 1953 film may be found here: http://archive.org/details/EyeOfTheBeho 
75.62.94.18 (talk) 01:27, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation link needed? 

message: Stephen takes his photos of Joanna and Mr. Hugo's son in the bank near the beginning of the flick.  His ephemeral daughter Lucy is jumping on the kiosk/couch near them when the photo is snapped.  At the train station while Stephen phones in to Hilary, he reviews that shot and discovers that where Lucy was "jumping" there is a blurry image, as of a school girl in motion.  It is at this point that he stops talking, apparently changes his mind about his mission, and rings off Hilary.  Did anyone else notice this?  Once you do the image is unmistakable.  Should it be mentioned in the plot synopsis? Dmforcier (talk) 06:41, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The photo
Talk:Marble Blast Ultra

message: Is this article clean enough to remove that badge/notification/board/whatever it is from the article? 24.18.240.159 (talk) 23:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean enough? 

message: I believe the article is incorrect on the release dates of the content packs, according to this page: http://marketplace.xbox.com/en-US/games/media/66acd000-77fe-1000-9115-d802584107d7/?p=1&of=3&sb=1#offers DuckReconMajor (talk) 05:45, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content packs 

message: *XNA preview
*Boyd Multerer blog on XNA/Marble Blast
*Planet Xbox 360 review
*Xbox.com - game with fame
 
For article expansion --Teancum (talk) 14:48, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References to use

message: The developers (GarageGames) lovingly ported the game to PC for free as reason of the removal from the Xbox Games Store (formerly Xbox Live Marketplace). Fully compatible with the Xbox 360 controller. Available as Torrent on TPB (Torrent ID: 8141675 MD5-Hash: D585D74240D01E580D50DAEB479A87B9CD7DF5EF). This should be mentioned in the article.
> "Modders have unofficially ported the game to PC, with no response from GarageGames or Graham Software Development."
That's not true. It was ported very professionally by the creators (employees of GarageGames), this is only possible with the original source code... I know the two guys who did it, but for obvious reasons, I won't name them on here.
Enjoy.
Earl --103.27.222.209 (talk) 03:24, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official PC port 

message: insufficient conten tfor a separate article  DGG ( talk ) 00:04, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Marble Blast Mobile]]
Talk:Xinzhuang District

message: Are there multiple Xinzhuangs in Taiwan?  Are the others notable?  If not, then why this move?  We don't say "San Antonio, Bexar", we say "San Antonio, Texas".  We don't say "Hannover, Lower Saxony", we say "Hannover, Germany". When specifying locations in Taiwan, English speakers normally use "Taiwan" if they need to clarify where in the world they are talking about.  Only if there is some potential for confusion (i.e. there are multiple locations in Taiwan having the same name) do they use more specific information such as the county name. Readin (talk) 19:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Taipei instead of Taiwan? 
Talk:Xindian District

message: Are there multiple Xindians in Taiwan?  Are the others notable?  If not, then why this move?  We don't say "San Antonio, Bexar", we say "San Antonio, Texas".  We don't say "Hannover, Lower Saxony", we say "Hannover, Germany". When specifying locations in Taiwan, English speakers normally use "Taiwan" if they need to clarify where in the world they are talking about.  Only if there is some potential for confusion (i.e. there are multiple locations in Taiwan having the same name) do they use more specific information such as the county name. Readin (talk) 19:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now it has been renamed to Xindian District. Chongkian (talk) 06:48, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Xindian, Taipei" instead of "Xindian, Taiwan"? 

message: Why don't we stick with the common name, given that the old name Sindian is still a lot more common in the English language? 202.64.189.90 (talk) 18:24, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no evidence here that "Sindian" is more common than "Xindian." The former is Tongyong pinyin, which was used from around 2002 to 2008, while the latter is Hanyu pinyin used since around 2009. The older form is Hsin-tien.--Jiang (talk) 03:54, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is as of 2012 the most common name in English? From what I know it's still Sindian. Wikipedia describes rather than prescribe as far as I know.  WP:Official names applies too. 202.64.189.90 (talk) 20:41, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no evidence here of the common name in English.--Jiang (talk) 06:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  From what I know both Sindian and Hsin-tien are more common that Xindian. Things may change, but it definitely hasn't yet changed. 202.64.189.90 (talk) 08:20, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the alternate spellings should at least be listed in the article. A simple Google search (from my location in the USA) shows 470,000 hits for "Sindian Taiwan", 420,000 hits for "Xindian Taiwan" and 330,000 for "Hsin-tien Taiwan".Phlar (talk) 17:51, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Common name versus official name
Talk:Da Capo II

message: In the current article, it says, "Sakura Yoshino and Junichi are the only returning characters, and Nemu is the only other character to be mentioned by name. Moe, Mako, Kotori, Miharu, and Yoriko are also mentioned, but indirectly."
This isn't true. After unlocking Sakura's DC path, she mentions Mako and Moe directly while thinking she should invite Yoshiyuki to the office for nabe. At least in the English translation done by Mangagamer. I suppose it's possible she doesn't mention their specific names in the original Japanese version, but seeing as this is the English wiki, I think the line quoted above should be changed to "Sakura Yoshino and Junichi are the only returning characters. Nemu, Mako and Moe are the only other characters to be mentioned by name. Kotori, Miharu, and Yoriko are also mentioned, but indirectly."
75.72.22.38 (talk) 09:21, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Returning Characters 
Talk:Suao Township

message: The use of "Taiwan Province, Republic of China" does not make for an NPOV statement in this article. There are too many political connotations that will surely make in both mainland China and Taiwan bristle. Some Communist pro-unity people refuse to recognize the existence of the Republic of China; other Taiwanese pro-independence supporters can't stand Taiwan being called a "province". But one thing all can agree on is that Suao is a city in Taiwan. This is the most neutral position. Bubbha 08:13, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Taiwan" or "Taiwan Province, Republic of China"?
Talk:Lloyd Osbourne

message: <<Lloyd's older sister Isobel (or 'Belle') was born the following year.>>  _Que_? 128.147.28.1 (talk) 16:09, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older Or Younger Sister? 

message: Most of this section is copied verbatim from Fanny Stevenson's biography page and has very little in the way of citations to back it up. I've been working on improving the Fanny Stevenson page so maybe that will yield some sources that could be used here too Ammienoot (talk) 21:51, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Life - Problems
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Policy and Guidelines

message: Greetings project members. I ask: does this project allow a policy/guideline based proposals to be drafted/developed at a subpage of this WikiProject? Several projects have workshops and do allow for this; I wondered if you do also. Thank you.--John Cline (talk) 05:42, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about drafting policy/guideline based proposals
Talk:Whitcomb L. Judson

message: The correct person should be Harry L. Earle, not Harry Earle (as this person is a football player in England). Whitcomb L. Judson manufactured zippers in the United States. See this story.--Doug Coldwell talk 21:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   Harry L. Earle 

message: 1. What does the picture show? The box of the waggon/streetcar seems not to be important as it is drawn in thin lines.
2. The structure in thicker lines seems to be a kind of suspension of the box on flat springs on 6 axles(?). 
3. Wheels are not shown. 4. At the bottom there is a rail, or rather a tube? --Helium4 (talk) 07:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture of railway patent 1889 

message: This article is part of Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20210315 and the Good article (GA) drive to reassess and potentially delist over 200 GAs that might contain copyright and other problems.  An AN discussion closed with consensus to delist this group of articles en masse, unless a reviewer opens an independent review and can vouch for/verify content of all sources. Please review Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/February 2023 for further information about the GA status of this article, the timeline and process for delisting, and suggestions for improvements.  Questions or comments can be made at the project talk page.  MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright contributor investigation and Good article reassessment
Talk:Generation of Chaos

message: could it be that the intro of the european version is changed? i watched the intro on youtube with the song unseen, but my game has some ingame music and totally different intro.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.56.201.19 (talk) 22:55, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: Some sites () call this title a tactical role-playing game. Is this correct? SharkD (talk) 05:48, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: TRPG

message: There's no info on other games of the series, or the anime, nor are there any links to such. As such, it's a dead-end. CFLeon (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: More Information Needed
Talk:The Mahdi

message: I have just come into possession of a hardcover copy of the book which gives a year of first publication as 1981. Article may need changing but I would prefer to have consensus before I do. Graham1973 (talk) 04:40, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of publication
Talk:Star Trek: Tactical Assault

message: Don't know if you want to add that in the article or not, but just letting you know. Interestingly, the packaging for the DS version of ST: Tactical Assault does not mention Rumble Pak compatibility. However, it is easily turned on in the game's "Options" section. The rumble effect in the game is implemented pretty well. I like it. Better than most of the rumble games for the DS.
*Yeah, he is right. (rct2guy 11:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI: This game works with the DS Rumble Pak 

message: Could something be added about the various classes of ships each race has? Tortinshaar (talk) 16:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ship Types=
Talk:Private Parts & Pieces

message: How can track 12 be both a demo of an unreleased song AND a new recrding?
:The song is a "Genesis" song that was officially recorded by the Banks-Collins-Gabriel-Hackett-Rutherford line-up as a potential single; however, the single did not end up materializing and the Genesis recording has never seen the light of day.  The new recording that Phillips put on this album is just him and his guitar, and is probably closer to how he and Mike Rutherford "demo'ed" the song to Genesis, hence the "demo" title. Hriped 05:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:X-Men: Phoenix – Warsong

message: Are they clones, or are they emma's daughters?
i think they're emma's daughters since they were formed using emma's eggs.
:That's right, using an egg (or sperm) cell won't give you a clone because it contains only half of a person's DNA. -- Noneofyourbusiness 22:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  14:54, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project
Talk:Star Wars: Empire at War: Forces of Corruption

message: The plot summary is very difficult to read and understand, with a number of unfinished sentences.  I haven't played the game - can someone who knows the story rewrite the plot summary so it makes sense?  Demosthenes X 03:58, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary 

message: Just read on the YouTube page for blamesociety.net that Matt Sloan, the voice of Chad Vader, is doing Darth Vader in this game.  Can anybody confirm this? --Cooleyez229 21:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  And the voice of Darth is Chad? 

message: Perhaps a critical reception-section would be in order? May I suggest using Gamestats, Gamerankings, Metacritic and Rotten Tomatoes as reference points? --Broadbandmink 15:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reception?

message: Since the modding Scene for EAW and FoC are pretty large, a mods section would be in order?
Ross 14:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mods

message: I've given the article a major rework, including:
*Summarizing the plot
*Mass grammar/spelling/formatting corrections
*Citing
*Correcting content errors
*Creating a development section
*Gathering stats for reviews
TheMoridian 12:30, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The reviews section needs to have prose as well as the raw scores - why did the expansion get the scores it did?  What did the reviewers think about it? -Malkinann (talk) 00:21, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renovation 

message: Remaining at start-class. There really needs to be some flesh on the development and reception sections before it can be rated higher.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 00:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment as of [[2008-09-18]] 

message: There's a few edits going back and forth regarding the words artifact (or artefact) and centre (or center).  While I investigate which is supposed to be used, I am going to change all occurrences to artifact and centre, because these are pretty much already used throughout the article anyway.  TheMoridian 16:10, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, the MOS says that either variety can be used providing consistency is maintained throughout the article.  So let's stick with artifact and centre.  TheMoridian 16:14, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spellings of American-English words
Talk:Residual income

message: How can an article about a term be a hoax? Are you suggesting someone invented the term and then put it on wikipedia? I don't think the article should be kept, but that's surely more of a WP:WINAD issue.Gorman 10:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The definition in network marketing is a hoax,  both in the claim that it exists and that it's called that.  I can't say I've heard the term used in conventional econmics either, except in "show business", where's is shortened to "residuals".  — Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 18:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax?
Talk:GWR 4500 Class

message: Mentioned in link that was erroneously removed, link shows 4555 sitting in Paigbton station. Section requires updating to reference return from loan 4555 Rileykat21 (talk) 11:15, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please find a reliable source, imgur is user generated. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:38, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The photo shows it in Paignton station:21/05/2023 11:18 is the time/date stamp Time/date stamp Rileykat21 (talk) 12:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Other than the page title "4555 at Paignton", there's nothing to show that it is at Paignton. I'm not saying that it's not Paignton, but unless somebody is very familiar with that setting, who knows where it might be? (some magazines run quizzes and competitions along the lines of "Mystery picture" or "Where is it?" - this could well be one such quiz). There's also nothing at all to indicate a date, and nothing to give a reason as to why that loco was in that place. We need a reliable source that positively indicates that the loco has been on the Dartmouth Steam Railway since that date. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:41, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  4555 has returned from loan
Talk:GWR 5700 Class

message: Has the sentence "As the oldest locomotives were the first to be withdrawn and sold for further use, they form the majority of preserved examples." Is this really true? If you regard old as referring to the earlier ones with "spectacle" windows then there's an 8/8 split in the sixteen preserved. If you regard old as meaning the first half of the class built (up to sometime in 1936), then again, there is an 8/8 split. I suspect it might come from a source on the LT locomotives and is probably true in that context.Robevans123 (talk) 21:03, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Question on preservation section

message: After re-reading/editing this page, I've realised/remembered that the 5700s were the first GWR 0-6-0PTs that were built  with panniers (see GWR_0-6-0PT#Classification  and ). Unfortunately GWR_0-6-0PT hasn't got any references to chase, and I don't think any of my references explicitly states that the 5700s were purpose-built as 0-6-0PTs. You can infer this from a complete reading of le Fleming... but does that make it WP:OR? Jones says they were not the first purpose built PTs, but only mentions 0-4-4 classes as previous purpose built classes. Robevans123 (talk) 22:51, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Stating the obvious?

message: Ever since I've been editing this article, I've wondered about this section, and whether it actually belongs here. I think would fit better in GWR 0-6-0PT (with a bit of editing, and references). I'd like to replace it here with a section on "Related locomotives" which would only mention pannier tanks relevant to the 5700s (ancestors, and later pannier tanks), but also include the updated Dean goods and later Collett goods locos, which influenced, or were influenced by, the 5700s. Any thoughts? Robevans123 (talk) 16:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Section on "Other pannier tank locomotives"