lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Inland navigation

message: I don't think the article meets the qualifications for a speedy delete. Inland navigation is an important type of navigation that is promoted by the government in many countries as a cost effective inland transportation method. I remember having two whole pages devoted to "inland navigation" in my high school geography class. It passes the Google test too. There are a few pages already linking to this one (interestingly, one in which a user notes the absence of such an article). I don't have sufficient info on the topic, and therefore I was able to create only a stub. If nobody can add info to this page, perhaps a merger with some other article is a more feasible idea. -- thunderboltza.k.a.Deepu Joseph |TALK16:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thats fine with me - it just looked a bit random as a one line article!  maybe we leave it a while as a stub and hope it gets fleshed out a bit soon, otherwise I agree that a merger is Ok too.  At least this converation is now logged with the article now.  Takecare Mammal4 16:15, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy delete
Talk:Ari Libsker

message: Still looking into Libsker's notability. Can anyone shed light on a group exhibition, in which Roee Rosen participated: "I Slept With Ari Libsker" (2001) Why Ari Libsker? gidonb 16:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Slept with Libsker
Talk:Foley artist

message: Why such an unusual style for the table? -- Whitepaw 11:19, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know, and it doesn't follow Wiki table markup code either so it's kind of hard to edit too. I think the author may just not have discovered how to make tables "Wiki style" and went for the HTML method. Should probably be remade using Help:Table with class="wikitable" markup for consistency. -- Northgrove 09:43, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, made a quick fix for this. -- Northgrove 09:52, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why such an unusual style for the table?

message: Does anyone have any idea if colleges offer classes specifically for aspiring foley artists? If anything, that would be a really fun elective. "Today class, we learn about all of the different things you can do with celery." Stale Fries taste better 16:20, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classes for foley artists? 

message: The last edit of the table seems to have made it disappear. (I can see the content in the wikisource, but not in the rendered copy. I tried to fix it, but I couldn't quite figure out the mediawiki table syntax. Would someone else know how to fix it up? 96.252.96.65 (talk) 22:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Binksternet (talk) 00:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How some effects are made 

message: Perhaps the two articles could be merged or better separated.  Foley_(filmmaking) has info that Foley_artist doesn't and vise versa.
66.178.143.189 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:24, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Similar to Foley_(filmmaking) 

message: "* Burning plastic garbage bags cut into strips make a cool sound when the bag melts and drips to the ground"
A cool sound for what purpose in a film?
74.104.53.233 (talk) 01:23, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cool Sound?
Talk:Jackline Maranga

message: The article says she was born in Kisii.  Does this mean Kisii town or Kisii District?  It needs to clarify and disambiguate. Beginning 16:09, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Kisii District. Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits) 20:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace
Talk:Edge code

message: Lets merge this and get it over with, I make a motion that we merge this. --Kylehamilton 22:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  Glennchan 05:12, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Be bold! Girolamo Savonarola 19:19, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Timbuktu!

message: Is the "Gregg Baker" reference correct? It includes no mention of an acting career. Jrharber56 (talk) 15:03, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Different person, he’s been unlinked now. Thanks for noticing.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 15:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Gregg Baker
Talk:Fortified wine

message: I've rearranged some parts of this article so that the introduction is more concise and summarises the rest of the page. I think it is adequate now, and that the tag can be removed. 202.89.188.248 (talk) 13:33, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited the introduction - detag? 

message: It is a pity that there is nothing in the article on the known history of wine fortification.Merlin Cox (talk) 00:36, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  History? 

message: It is not necessary to add distilled alcohol to make a fortified wine. Direct fermentation can reach about 19% ABV if given sufficient time. Sweet sherries are usually made by adding small amounts of dried sweet grapes to a fermenting wash until it reaches 18%. It can take up to 2mo to reach 18%, while reaching 10% within just a few days. Expensive sparking wines traditionally have a small amount of brandy added to replace the volume lost when yeast sediment is expelled via the inverted bottle method.220.244.87.108 (talk) 03:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Alcohol 

message: when most people think about fortified wine, they think of Ripple. 
Why is there no mention of Ripple in this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:14C5:8762:219:E3FF:FED3:9BF8 (talk) 18:29, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What About Ripple?
Talk:Taboo (musical)

message: Gilmore Girls Season 6 Episode 13 references the musical Taboo, so maybe put that under a popular culture subheading?  Which I do not know how to do yet. I have the ep and the quote if someone can walk me through it. OmneBonum (talk) 13:59, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: How do I add a new section?

message: I find the Productions section confusing. It's not clear whether the Broadway production discussed is a new show or whether they moved the London one. There is no mention of when the London production ended and why. Was it a limited run? 
I wasn't even clear whether the cast listed was the London or Broadway performance - which is what I was trying to look up. It seemed like the Broadway discussion may have been an aside.
After a lot of Googling it seems like it was the same cast and it moved, but I couldn't confirm it enough to edit and cite. I still don't know why the London ended. My information was mostly garnered through CD track listings. As it is now the section needs work with better sources. -Lciaccio (talk) 17:33, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Production history is confusing

message: See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Suspected hacked account. Page was extensively edited by User:EVITANDY who has now been blocked for adding nonsense. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 17:56, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks  Specifically, I removed this unsourced section. I don't know how much of it might or might not be true, but the same editor has been making nonsense edits elsewhere. Alexander 'Beef' Stewart (deleted, so sorry, admin only) from back around the same time seems like obvious fabrication. And, curiously, it credits an Andrew Hilton while the removed section from this article credits an Andrew Holton. And then recently, after a long period of inactivity, the account was used for adding nonsense like this. That led to suspicions of a hacked account, but I think intermittent vandalism/fabrication seems a likely alternative. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:32, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

text: Oh, and if anyone knows enough about it to trim the plot section, that would be a big improvement too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification needed
Talk:Stiletto

message: The Canadian Oxford describes a stiletto as a short dagger with a thick blade, but this article describes it as having a long and slender blade. Is one of the two wrong?--Sonjaaa (talk) 00:55, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

message: The 'Stiletto Titanium Tool' section has literally nothing to do with stiletto daggers. Stiletto Titanium Tool Company sells hand tools for construction, and not daggers of any kind. That section is essentially an advertisement. I apologize for not posting here properly or deleting the section myself (registered signature and all that), but I came here interested in knowing more about stiletto daggers and it pissed me off when I saw an advertisement.155.101.197.196 (talk) 02:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Stiletto Titanium Tool

message: Very interesting weapons. I collect various (mostly switch blade) stilletos. Is there any museum or museum collection specializes in Stiletto knives?Eddson storms (talk) 08:44, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very interesting article! I collect modern day stillettos Is there a museum
Talk:Entrance examination

message: --202.63.114.136 16:40, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: --

message: I'm feeling low Mohammad Farhan Gilkar (talk) 13:26, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello 

message: The concours général is not an entrance examination. It's purely honorary, and is just here to award (only by the prize) the best students. Odyseus2 (talk) 19:45, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  France
Talk:Thomas J. Reese

message: As pointed out by Father RJ Neuhaus in the May issue of the journal First Things, Father Reese's resignation was not brought about by Vatican pressure, but rather, as Neuhaus explains, because of pressure from American sources.  And this pressure, one can accurately assume, stemmed from America's frequent flouting of Church doctrine, especially regarding fidelity to the Magisterium, not from the magazine's publishing of articles which 'merely' discussed contentious issues such as abortion, contraception and so forth.
Abortion is not merely a "contentious" issue within the Catholic Church - it is seen quite simply as murder. Historically, there has never been any lack of absolute opposition towards it. Proposing that such things seen merely as issues would be contrary to Catholic doctrine. Supporting abortion publically as a Catholic incurs automatic excomunication - so it isn't an option as a Catholic to express views in favour of it let alone commit the actual act --58.175.61.137 14:18, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  America Resignation 

message: This Thomas Reese is not a member of NAS. This article is about Thomas J. Reese, the Catholic priest. Thomas S. Reese, a neuroscientist, is a member of NAS. 64.149.42.142 (talk) 21:31, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Academy of Sciences 

message: Jesuits normally defer to the provincial. Unless there was some special arrangement in this case, I fail to see what this sentence is doing here. --90.236.104.43 (talk) 12:02, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "deferred editorially" 

message: I suppose this equals the dead link  but since I haven't checked the contents, I don't want to replace the dead link with this search. --90.236.104.43 (talk) 12:09, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference: America publications 

message: I can't see that Reese uses the J much. Probably "Thomas Reese (Jesuit)" would be a better title. --90.236.104.43 (talk) 07:22, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig title 
Talk:Intermittent mechanism

message: "The intermittent mechanism or intermittent movement is the device by which film is regularly advanced and then held in place for a brief duration of time in a movie camera or movie projector."
:What about movie printers ? Filmtechniker--80.219.134.244 (talk) 09:00, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition

message: There's a section in parenthesis that makes little sense to me and breaks up the flow of the text:
"the standard for regular motion in North America is 1/48 of a second, which corresponds to 180 degrees, but shutters with 200 degrees were popular back when the then-available color negative film had an ASA of 50; today's color negative film is available with an ASA of 500"
It seems to only apply to North America, is unsourced and vague on dates and definitions.  I'll move it to the end of the section and let someone who understands these things better either expand or remove it  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.139.13.2 (talk) 12:27, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Methods used
Talk:Tony Award for Best Scenic Design

message: I'm not sure there's really any practical need for separate articles yet, but the title of this one (specifying "Musical") is confusing when followed by the immediate statement that a single Tony is given for best design of a musical OR play (as indeed it has been, for most of the Tonys' history).
The article's title might as well change (revert?) to simply "Tony Award for Best Scenic Design" for the time being.  But regardless of whether the play/musical division stands, mention should be made, near the top of the page, of the year (was it as recently as 2005?) when the award category of Best Scenic Design was subdivided between the two genres.
It would also be more convenient (regardless of the fact that most of the nominees, and even many of the winners, don't yet have articles of their own) if the names were linked each time they appear.  The current links are inconsistent, so that, e.g., of John Lee Beatty's many nominations, only one links to his (still-to-be-written) article; Ben Edwards's name links twice, but appears multiple other times without being highlighted as a link, etc.  Given the longevity of many of these designers' careers -- and assuming that their articles do eventually get written -- it could become a chore to find which of their multiple citations is the "hot" one.
:Apparently people don't know what the difference between a musical and a play are.  When did best scenic design become split?  That'll dertimine when best scenic design should end and *musical and *play should begin. --Lekogm 18:43, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best set/Musical vs. Best set/Play
Talk:Tony Award for Best Featured Actress in a Musical

message: It seems as though the wrong things are being italicized here. The titles of shows should be italicized. The names of actors, and the roles they played, should not be. - Nunh-huh 17:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I noticed that this article has a trivia section.  This might need to be removed or better incorporated into the rest of the article. —Mears man (talk) 06:13, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Is the performance part necessary? It is too long and besides its usually refereed without it.--JDDJS (talk) 18:58, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming
Talk:Tony Award for Best Featured Actor in a Musical

message: The trivia section in this article might need to be removed, retitled to something else that's more appropriate, or better incorporated into the rest of the article. —Mears man (talk) 06:16, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Is the performance part necessary? It is too long and besides its usually refereed without it.--JDDJS (talk) 18:58, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved.  No consensus.  Insufficient evidence that current title is too long, or that shorter title is correct. Next time, please use multi-move.    Born2cycle (talk) 05:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming 

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Tony Award for Best Performance by a Leading Actor in a Musical - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 21:20, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Tony Award for Best Actress in a Musical

message: The trivia section in this article probably needs to be dealt with, either by removing it or sourcing it properly and better incorporating it into the article somehow. —Mears man (talk) 06:26, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Since this comes up occasionally, I thought I'd put this note here for future reference. Audra McDonald did NOT win any Tonys for Lead Actress in a Musical. She won:
*Featured Actress in a Musical--1994, Carousel
*Featured Actress in a Play--1996, Master Class
*Featured Actress in a Musical--1998 Ragtime
*Featured Actress in a Play--2004 Raisin in the Sun.
Reference here: Official Tony Awards site, Audra McDonald
JeanColumbia (talk) 23:31, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: For the record Audra McDonald

message: For the record: On Feb 25, 2009, IP 98.111.169.99 changed the number of nominations for Rebecca Luker, Marin Mazzie, Audra McDonald and  Kelli O'Hara. I have changed these back to the way they were. They each have 2 nominations in this particular category (see, for example, ). The confusion may lie in a too-quick reading of the Tony Award information, where FEATURED and LEAD may be misread; also, in Audra's case, she has been nominated, and won, in another category: Featured Actress in a PLAY. JeanColumbia (talk) 10:07, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Nominations

message: I am sorry for moving the article without first discussing about it here. I just felt the previous name was too long and it's usually refereed to by this name. I tried to undo it but it was too late.--JDDJS (talk) 18:55, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming
Talk:Backlot

message: The "Demise" section says "The mediocre box office performance of the 1967 film Camelot," but that film was the tenth-highest-grossing of 1967. Maybe this should refer to critical reception instead? Unless the film industry considers #10 to be "mediocre?" I don't know the field well enough to say, or I'd make the change myself.
*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 09:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demise
Talk:HMS Perseus (N36)

message: In Royal Navy usage ships titles and names are not prefixed with 'The' as in 'The HMS Perseus', but use the form 'HMS Perseus'. The reason for this is apparent if the words are spelled out in their long-form, eg.
:'The Her Majesty's Ship Perseus', clearly makes no grammatical sense, so this form is not used. Instead, with 'The' omitted we get
:'Her Majesty's Ship Perseus'. Which makes perfect sense, grammatically.
:: This format may not always be applicable to vessels of other navies, eg 'the USS Enterprise'. Brian.Burnell 16:49, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Titling

message: Last paragraph: "It was attended by relatives of the deceased (including John Capes' daughter), members of the Submarine Old Comrade's Association or Gatwick, locals who hid Capes, a member of the caique crew who transported Capes to Smyrne etc."
 
1. "or" should clearly be: of. 
2. Searching the Submarine Old Comrade's Association website brings up no results for Gatwick. I'm presuming that it should be Gosport, home of the Royal Navy Submarine Museum. Unless anyone suggests otherwise, I intend to edit the article. 
3. "Smyrne" should be: Smyrna. Robert P Connolly (talk) 13:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Submarine Old Comrade's Association or Gatwick"
Talk:Scenic design

message: — Assignment last updated by Joeleu (talk) 21:58, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Theatre and Technology

message: Looking at the scenic design article, I have noticed that there's been more sources and references that have been cited. Looking at the viewing history, I've noticed that a new heading was added titles 'history of the topic'. I also noticed more information was added to "Elements of Scenic Design" stating key points on the topic. Overall, the information of the article is clear, comprehensive, and consistent which I like. Excited to see more updates to come. Njitstu45 (talk) 03:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:Tony Award for Best Actor in a Musical

message: The trivia section should either be removed or better incorporated into the article. —Mears man (talk) 06:27, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Is the performance part necessary? It is too long and besides its usually refereed without it.--JDDJS (talk) 18:57, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming 

message: Why were there no awards that year?  Does anyone know?  Thanks.   (64.252.65.146 (talk) 01:23, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved.  No consensus.  Insufficient evidence that current title is too long, or that shorter title is correct. Next time, please use multi-move.    Born2cycle (talk) 05:50, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1985 

message: The labels on the charts for "Roles" and "Project" appear to be the wrong way around. 73.24.182.244 (talk) 17:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labels on charts
Talk:Scene (performing arts)

message: Gosh, is this sexist or what?
Don't you ever watch movies with female leads?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rozzychan~enwiki (talk • contribs) 19:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: love scene

message: This section seems to be largely cut and pasted from a Web site without attribution: http://4mr.bobby.googlepages.com/filmsequence— Preceding unsigned comment added by Joachim57 (talk • contribs) 15:58, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Various scenes
Talk:Wagner's disease

message: Former pro football from Manchester,MI,also known as Nick "The Quick" Davis, Nick Davis has been diagnosed w/ Wagner's Disease. Nick Davis was Running Back on Wiscon Badgers, Minnesota Vikings, and Miami Dolphins. Just shortly after he retired in football and went back to Wisconsin to finish his degree in business, Nick found out that he had this rare, but deadly disease. I feel so sorry for him. I've known him my whole life, but I've never said a word to him. I feel so bad.
~unknown
He rare but deadly disease, revered tot above, is not wagner desease.
93.125.152.133 (talk) 08:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable case
Talk:Kingdom of Evendarr

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject!  JubalHarshaw 16:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

message: Is there any evidence to suggest that this setting is notable independently of NERO? If not, it should probably be merged and deleted. Ryan Paddy (talk) 20:26, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Royal Malay Regiment

message: This is some extra informal material that may be of use, but I'm not listing sources or putting it into the article.
The military garrison of the Malay States was mostly Indian Army units. As a result of the mutiny of an Indian unit during the first world war, it was politically difficult to have Indian units in Malaya. Gurkhas were acceptable, but not regular Indian units. It was eventually decided to garrison Malaya with battalions of the Burma Rifles. The battalions served in rotation in the 1920s and 1930s. Its likely that part of the reason that the Malay Regiment was raised was the intention (and conequences of) to separate Burma from India. After seperation, the burma Rifles would no longer be available and the various alternatives were not considered attractive in the long term. 12.96.162.45 22:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  some extra informal material 

message: Um, I'm looking at the 10th Parachute Brigade page and I see a 9th Battalion, Royal Malay Regiment. Can anyone confirm if that is independent or not and if that info is still accurate? Faith15 14:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Unit?