Talk:Melinda Messenger

message: gruezi voll! we will give further references to this addition to melissas page as well as links to pages containing the records and dates of Trinity Biologicals notification to the ICC and american FBI with regards the international case of a "50 year cycle of crimes against humanity" from members of the american government and various american entities exemplified in some of the more illegitimate or questionably prosecuted, yet documented, wars it has engaged in...
:I'd like to take the above as additional justification for the removal of the big soapboxing paragraph from the article. Not only did it document a staggeringly trivial mention in the media, it flew off into some utterly bizarre conspiracy theory which has nothing to do with Melinda Messenger in the slightest. Sockatume 20:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: lol what Jack Hunter 01:22, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I hate to break it to you, but she carries two bags of potentially harmful man-made chemicals in her chest at all times, so clearly she's not that bothered about them. Jack Hunter 10:26, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

text: This is an encyclopedia! It's not Benjiwolf's Marxist Conspiracy Monthly! Please read the three pillars of Wikipedia policy, WP:NPOV, WP:OR and WP:V. Sockatume 18:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Please, please, please Benjiwolf, get yourself a writer or at least an editor. Your unpunctuated, unparagraphed streams of consciousness are likely to guarantee your message not getting through.83.170.105.48 (talk) 08:37, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

text: (Here via RfC). Erm, this is still on WP:RfC even though it's over a month since the disputed content was on the page. Should it still be an active RfC at all? With the wisdom of hindsight, it looks like a storm in a teacup. There's no need for any of it to go in the article.  Telsa (talk) 23:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemicals 

message: *I'm not sure 'controversy' is the right word.  It sounds like BBC assumed Messenger's opinion was uninformed, which would be irresponsible journalism since it's apparently not the case (as a private citizen's opinion, not an expert's).  But it's not clear that it represents a noteworthy event. Peter Grey 01:38, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (Here via RfC). Erm, this is still on WP:RfC even though it's over a month since the disputed content was on the page. Should it still be an active RfC at all? With the wisdom of hindsight, it looks like a storm in a teacup. There's no need for any of it to go in the article.  Telsa (talk) 23:29, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments (RfC) 

message: Melinda announced a trial separation from husband Wayne today (see www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk) Rob Burbidge (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation 

message: Also, more trivially, I've briefly met Ms. Messenger and I'd be very surprised if her height is 5'4" - I'd say closer to 4'11" or 5'0" - but this is not sourced. Rob Burbidge (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 

message: The reference given that states that she had breast enhancements does NOT state this. In fact, it states the exact opposite: that she has always denied having breast enhancement. This claim needs to be backed up with a suitable reference or removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.44.146.248 (talk) 16:50, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breast enhancements 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Melinda Messenger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060929143031/http://www.actionaid.org.uk/lickchildpoverty/melinda-messenger/ to http://www.actionaid.org.uk/lickchildpoverty/melinda-messenger/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Melinda Messenger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080725024740/http://www.askmen.com/women/models_60/71_melinda_messenger.html to http://www.askmen.com/women/models_60/71_melinda_messenger.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:11, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: for a notable person with a well-documented life, this article is awash with unsourced claims.
without the unsourced claims, the article is just as informative, and more reputable.
thanks for helping us edit Wikipedia, please source and correctly cite any re-added content,
Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 20:16, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  burdened with too much uncited