lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shenzhen Bao'an International Airport

message: Does this article need a see also section to the greater list of PRC airports?  If so, it should obviously point to the articles name, not a POV redirect. SchmuckyTheCat 16:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's needed as per Wikipedia:Lists#Navigation, Wikipedia:Lists (embedded lists). Both links are not NPOV to the everyone. The disputed parties involved should preserve the status quo ante, instead of insisting on their own POV. — Instantnood 18:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What? SchmuckyTheCat 19:58, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: See Also

message: Shenzhen offers flights to Luxembourg??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.152.82.55 (talk) 03:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Destinations

message: This is a same flight number, same plane service, so there is no terminal change at PEK. Verify it in FR24 here. Sources here and here. 
Also see WP:Airports page content, #7. For examples of this elsewhere on wiki:
* AI 127 HYD-DEL-ORD same plane: HYD is listed on ORD page. 
* AKL and CHC on the DXB page, as EK operates direct service through multiple cities on to these airports. - ✈Sunnya343✈ (talk) 14:30, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: See PEK airport page. International flights by CA use a totally separate terminal (3E) than domestic flights (3C). HkCaGu (talk) 18:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air China to Los Angeles 
Talk:Murasame

message: Why in the world does this article redirect to Cosmic Era Mobile Units? (Actually, it's not impossible that there is some MS named that... I would rather have seen a page on some legendary sword :/)
*Agreed. This should be a disambiguation page, "Murasame" is used as the name of a sword in many Japanese RPGs, is it not? Not unlike Masamune.--Lord Shitzu 02:34, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
:On ja.wp, this is disambiguation page (:ja:村雨) including the name of rain, swords, naval vessels, Gundam-related things, etc. And the page says that the sword is a fictitious one, originally from a Japanese novel The Biographies of Eight Dogs (:ja:南総里見八犬伝). // There was another sword (and sword smith) with similar name, Muramasa (:ja:村正) and the article says they are real ones. - Marsian / talk 9 July 2005 05:02 (UTC)
I removed the comment about Muramase being Auron's sword in FFX, as it implied that was the only instance. Muramase is in at least 4 Final Fantasy games, probably nearly all of them. I also removed the line about Masamune from ff7, I don't understand why it's relevant. If somebody is willing to list all of the instances Muramase appears in Final Fantasy games (or even all video games) it might make a decent article to link from this disambiguation. Usea 14:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Knut Wicksell

message: I just wanted to thank the author for this excellent article and for the link to the Reserve Bank of Dallas's article on Wicksell. --Maynardophile 23:45, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: thanks

message: Too much of this article is taken from the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas biography (one of the references).  It's copied. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.91.30.26 (talk) 13:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright material 

message: When I was researching the entry I created for the benefit principle...I found plenty of reliable resources which cited Wicksell as being largely responsible for the early development of this concept.  However, this entry doesn't mention the benefit principle.  Can't say that it's a priority for me to put a paragraph together...but I just wanted to bring this to the attention of any editors that might be interested in sharing Wicksell's contributions.  --Xerographica (talk) 10:22, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benefit principle 

message: The first paragraph of this entry and the second paragraph of the "Lecturer" section say he married Anna Bugge, but her entry says they united without marrying.2600:1700:830:5CF0:0:0:0:42 (talk) 03:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps Wicksell didn't marry? 
Talk:Schapelle Corby

message: The first article ever written about him (http://www.ikjeld.com/japannews/00000164.php) - republished in New Idea - says that Kimi Tanaka is a pseudonym. Most of the subsequent reporting just gives that name as if it's fact. Should his name be changed to "Unknown"? Mickyc85 (talk) 13:18, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ex-husband's name 

message: I think this does need to be normalised to match every other page. A further reading suggestion of a book which was litigated against and pulped by the publisher for copyright breaches, as per the court transcript https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B7MjwfM7HGBgS1QtaGV5ajFjUVk/edit?resourcekey=0-lG4TYUVBj1w4KireQmplMQ should be removed. 
The successful defamation cases against it certainly make the reference impossible to sustain. The definition of defamation is after all "communicating false statements about a person that injure the reputation of that person". In the Wikipedia context the page is directly referring readers to false statements. As per https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/national/schapelle-corbys-family-awarded-almost-1-million-in-sins-of-the-father-defamation-case/news-story/ded5c50cf16930dfb17c41dc50c6f524  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LegalZeagle (talk • contribs) 16:46, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Reading Edit
Talk:Jeannie Longo

message: The material in the Palmarès section is based directly on the data from Jeannie Longo's web site. This section will consist only of the highlights of a very long and illustrious career and will be built gradually over the next couple of weeks. One correction was made: originally, the article stated that Longo was a multiple Olympic Gold medalist. In fact, she has 3 Olympic medals, but only 1 Gold medal.
JFPerry 14:02, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I tried to add category links so Longo would show up at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Olympic_cyclists_of_France
but it didn't work ...needs someone more proficient--Billymac00 00:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done SeveroTC 09:05, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  categories 

message: Er, what?! Will try and puzzle this out at some point but even if she'd won TT, road race, CX and pursuit or something it'd take winning 3 of the 4 every year for 20 years... Beccaviola (talk) 15:39, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This must be a typo.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.112.18.166 (talk) 19:59, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: It's wrong. I've replaced it with 24 wins, with a reference to ports-reference.com. --Falcorian (talk) 04:26, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  59-times champ 
Talk:Suwałki

message: I ran into German-Soviet Protocol of 10 January 1941 Concerning Transfer of the Rights to the Suwalki Strip to the USSR. Any specifics? 
A book I am reading right now (Christopher Andrew, Oleg Gordievsky, KGB: The Inside Story of its Foreigh Operations from Lenin to Gorbachev) says that in January 1941 the Soviet Union bought Suvalki (?) from Germany for 7.5 mln dollars in gold. This info may also be found on net in the form that suggests that it was copied from this book.
Verified info about this must update this, Polish areas annexed by the Soviet Union and Polish areas annexed by Nazi Germany articles.  Mikkalai 05:13, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviet Suwalki
Talk:BFG10K

message: Are there any sources for this information or is it all original research?  Unless someone can put in some references pretty soon, I'm going to start slashing the commentary or suggest a merger. PubliusFL 19:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: Is this really notable? It seems most notable because of the homage to the BFG9000. - A Link to the Past (talk) 03:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: It was Big Force Gun in the movie and this article says Bio force. ???? SakotGrimshine
I've googled it a lot and I can't find much. People go back and forth. But I've heard people claim that "Big Force Gun" is a mistake. Be nice to get a good source on this. SakotGrimshine 19:10, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Force or Bio Force?
Talk:List of English words of Czech origin

message: How important is marking this list as incomplete: it is 20% longer than the only list I remember having seen elsewhere at the back of a dictionary.--Henrygb 23:49, 27 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: 1) The word "robot" came into English via Czech, since it appeared for the first time as a Czech word in the Czech play R.U.R.. 2) Robota means "labour" in both Czech and Slovak and the odd circumstances of its creation are irrelevant here. Qertis 23:31, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  robot 

message: I really disagree with the definition there. It does not come from Polák or polský. It comes from word půlka (half in English) from the music tempo, but I am not so sure in my English to write good definition. --Cs-Reaperman 15:41, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  polka 

message: The word dollar originates from Czechia, not from Czech language. As the note says it is from thaler. Czech tolar and English dollar originate from the same German word. See for example . I will remove it.--Jirka6 04:32, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  dollar 

message: I really like this little list. I am studying for a spelling bee and i really liked it. It is pretty useful and I do think it is a good compilation of Czech language originated words. Thank you to whoever compiled it!
15zhongk (talk) 23:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Czech List Compilation 

message: I'm sceptical that this Czech term is actually used in English. The Czechoslovakian Wolfdog article cites only one source, and this source gives the English name for the breed as "Czechoslovakian Wolfdog" and has "Ceskoslovensky Vlcak" in parentheses, implying that the latter is the Czech language name. Nowhere is it stated that English speakers refer to this breed using the word "vlčák". As a native English speaker I have no idea even how to pronounce this word. It seems unlikely that this word has actually been adopted into English as it contains characters not found in English that would present a serious stumbling block for anyone unfamiliar with Czech pronunciation.Smcg8374 (talk) 12:50, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Czechoslovakian vlčák English? 

message: Budweiser, Michelob, Pulitzer Sambeckwith (talk) 16:27, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Few Suggestions
Talk:Turkistan Islamic Party

message: According to Sean Roberts' recent piece for Foreign Policy, the ETIM "barely existed," but it has been exaggerated by the Chinese government to justify its crackdown on Uyghurs. If this is true, we should update the article accordingly. Qzekrom (she/her • talk) 18:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I can see that the article already covers Sean Roberts' voicing the same concerns a decade earlier, his stance then being "It is difficult to justify the allegations that ETIM is a sophisticated and dangerous terrorist organization with links to Al-Qaeda and it is perfectly reasonable to assume that the organization no longer exists at all,". The skeptic angle seems to be divided in two parts: It never having existed at all, or it maybe having existed once upon a time. As it stands, the article seems to neutrally both sides, so I'm guessing it's just a matter of appending this new article to the "analysis" section. Eik Corell (talk) 19:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sean Roberts says ETIM is mostly a hoax 

message: There is quite some conflicting sentences in the designation section of TIP as a terrorist organization. The section starts with a list of countries and entities that designate TIP as a terrorist organization, which also includes the United States. Yet, immediately after that same sentence, we read that US dropped ETIM/TIP from its terrorism list in 2020. So, could we remove the US from that section (and also other sections of the article that has the US designate TIP as terrorist organization in present tense)?Xaveq 01:52, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What changes should be made after the US dropped TIP/ETIM from its terrorism list? 

message: According to this source  China use the historic name of the group 'East Turkistan Islamic Movement' (ETIM) as broader term for Uighur jihadist groups not just TIP, which result in attacked being attributed to TIP which may not have anything todo with it. --Jakey222 (talk) 01:50, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The attack list is suspect 

message: Since Idlib is liberated by the Syrian army there is no evidence this organisation still use it as HQ 92.218.146.145 (talk) 06:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idlib headquarters
Talk:BANANA

message: I've removed the Prod tag that was added today, because:
It would be better to either merge&redirect this article to NIMBY, or softredirect it to wikt:BANANA, (or do something else). I'm not sure which. Thoughts? -- Quiddity (talk) 18:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge with NIMBY first choice, or redirect to wikt second. I was about to prod it as nn, glad I saw this first. Itsmejudith (talk) 13:11, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I redirected this page to the disambig page, to save having to add a hatnote at NIMBY. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:09, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge or redirect
Talk:Letter of credence

message: Please stop moving this page to Letter of credence (sic). Lowercasing it like that is as illiterate as writing Queen elizabeth ii or President of the united states. Wikipedia correctly lowercases things that belong in lowercase but there are names, titles, formal references, proper nouns, etc that have to be uppercased. If you lowercase Letter of Credence you get something that actually means something totally different. Uppercased it means formal letters between heads of state accrediting diplomats. Lowercased it means simply an accreditation letter, which could be to the bank, an employer or whomever. It is the same when people lowercase advice everywhere even though it is uppercased for a reason - Advice = binding instruction from a government to a head of state, whereas advice means simply advice from anyone to anyone else about anything which they don't have to obey if they don't want to. Casing in diplomatic and constitutional topics is done for a reason. Please stop screwing up articles on constitutional and legal topics if you don't know what you are doing. Things are uppercased for a reason not because whomever wrote it just felt like it. FearÉIREANN 01:31, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Lowercase

message: The current article seems to assume that all states issue and accept Letters of Credence on behalf of the head of state but on advice of the government, which is not universally true. For example, the King of Jordan does both of his own accord, not on advice of his National Assembly; the President of the United States, meanwhile, takes the (binding) advice of the Senate when issuing a Letter of Credence, but whether to accept one from a foreign state or not is solely his decision. --Delirium 08:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A bit Commonwealth-centric

message: The article is incorrect with respect to diplomatic immunity.  The conferral of immunity is a matter of the municipal law of the Receiving State (and so it varies from State to State).  However, the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations sets out in Article 39 that a diplomatic agent is entitled to privileges and immunities from, "the moment he enters the territory of the receiving State"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Visagrunt (talk • contribs) 22:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Diplomatic Immunity

message: Isn't is a bit odd to include South Ossetia in an example? That 'state' is at the moment only recognized by two states: Russia and Nicaragua (oh and Abkhazia, but that one has also minimal international recognition). Showing the meeting between the South Ossetian envoy and the Russian president is in that way very political and not NPoV. I propose to delete the example and image from this wikipedia entry. 80.127.58.65 (talk) 14:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Ossetia? 

message: As most of the article is unsourced, I've removed the two sections that have zero sourcing, as noted since 2014. While some of the material is entertaining, it falls into the realm of original research, and without any sourcing, it cannot remain. --Pete (talk) 00:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced
Talk:Mk 14 Enhanced Battle Rifle

message: Somebody should probably change all the caps in the article, it looks ridiculous like this. Primergrey (talk) 23:18, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I think I got them all.  Felsic2 (talk) 23:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Get to work 

message: Back on 2012 Nov 23, at 16:43, User:24.92.175.206 made an edit adding an acronym without a definition: ODA. Can we please have someone define it or remove it. (That user made only 4 edits in his lifetime, 3 on this page. It might do to look over those other edits as well.)
Thanks! WesT (talk) 23:32, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unknown Acronym 

message: In six different places the term EBR is appended with -RI. What does that mean? Where is it defined?? (Once there is an EBR-KH, with no clear meaning as well.)
Thanks!  WesT (talk) 23:36, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Rock Island—it's given in the infobox image caption and can be inferred from a line in the "History" section and its entry in the "Variants" table, though it's not explicitly stated in the body. I don't know what "KH" stands for, but it seems that this refers to a rifle case. I have to believe it's not particularly important. WP Ludicer (talk) 07:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing terminology 

message: That's an M14EBR-RI. Since the page is titled for the Mk 14, I propose swapping that image with the one of an actual Mk 14 seen further down in the Users section. Spartan198 (talk) 03:11, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox Image
Talk:Christian VIII of Denmark

message: Shouldn't it be persona non grata? Insteaed of persona ingratissima? Bo-Lingua 01:46, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the following quote from the text:
"Christian Frederick would have been more entitled even to the Swedish crown than current heir Jean-Baptiste Bernadotte, being descended from Gustav I of Sweden through both his mother and his father."
I trimmed this piece of text below.
"Sweden refusing Christian's conditions, a short campaign ensued, in which the Norwegian army was easily defeated by the superior skill and forces of the Swedish crown prince Bernadotte. "
"More entitled"? This section of the text has no purpose. Why would a descendant of Gustav I of Sweden be more "entitled" to rule? This is a PoV-statement.
The second quote is too biased.. "easily defeated...superior skill and forces". The simple statement "..the Norwegian army was defeated by the forces of the Swedish crown prince" is enough. Fred26 07:32, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Christian Frederick would have been more entitled..." 

message: That infobox, besides looking like a gaudy winebottle ticket, doesn't have any practical use in the biography of a long-dead Danish monarch. Is it possible to remove it? Glatisant (talk) 09:04, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. First of all it seems highly superflous to have such a box on any monarch living or dead, secondly it gets even more absurd when it is placed on non-English speaking monarchs that would not even had used the examples shown in the box. I am going to delete it from the article. --Saddhiyama (talk) 10:07, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Monarchical Styles infobox

message: He was the dedicatee of Niels Gade's hour-long cantata "Comala", Op.12 published in 1847 (in vocal score- not, I think, published in full score until rather later, but the dedication is there in the IMSLP-uploaded vocal score) and several other works of music. :) (The best-known work dedicated to him may be Liszt's Reminiscences of Don Juan.) ELSchissel (talk) 12:26, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memorialized in music...
Talk:Jean-Marc Fournier

message: This article seems very obviously. --YUL89YYZ 02:04, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC)
I see you live in Toronto. When you have moved to Quebec, and lived here for a lifetime, you will be qualified to write and criticize informed articles about its politicians. Until then, as your narcissistic user page suggests, you are being a stuck-up toad. Stop vandalizing my article. --24.200.155.103 02:37, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:International writing contest

message: Suggest a change to the rules that if it an article's current revision is a near-total rewrite executed within the past month that has left <2000 characters, it qualifies. 119 02:22, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: So, as one of the people who was asked to judge this: what are we now supposed to do? -- Jmabel | Talk 23:31, Apr 1, 2005 (UTC)
:: Read and comment briefly on the articles; come up with a top ten list (not necessarily in order).  Then we should discuss our results, and reach consensus on the best nominations, in order.  Perhaps an IRC meeting next weekend?  Then we announce results on the mailing list, and post them here and to the meta page. +sj +
:Tell you what: I'm going to start a Wikipedia:International writing contest/Judges' comments page. -- Jmabel | Talk 02:16, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
::: Lovely.  +sj + 21:57, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Judging

message: I think it's a credit to the authors of the articles here that, of the top six, four of the articles are now featured with a fifth about to go through unanimously.  Great work! violet/riga (t) 12:04, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured status 

message: Somewhat inspired by thes, the Wikipedia:Article rating competition is a proposal to informally rate articles under given topics chosen every week.  Take a look and comment on the talk page.  violet/riga (t) 19:19, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rating competition
Talk:Huxley

message: Son of Leonard means son of which Leonard?
Pdn 02:56, 28 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: According to her own article, "Her husband, Gervas Huxley, was also Aldous Huxley's cousin." If that is so, she was not the daughter-in-law of Leonard, who was Aldous' father.80.195.188.190 (talk) 11:53, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Elspeth Huxley]]

message: I've just restored the three famous Huxley names.  Two have been here a long time.  And I'm astonished that anyone should be hostile to being helpful to likely users.  Preferring they be made to jump through official hoops.  --GwydionM (talk) 07:54, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There are many famous Huxleys, why do these three merit special treatment? And you say a long time, but you only added Thomas in April 2017 and Petshmm added Adlous in May 2017. older ≠ wiser 10:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make them work?