Talk:Leona Helmsley

message: Very new to this so I apologize if I'm doing this wrong. I just noticed, with all the discussion on Rick Santorum's talk page about whether mentioning that people were trying to change his name into some sort of scatological insult would violate NPOV, on this page, mention is made of Leona Helmsley being the 'Queen of Mean'. I would think the same rule applies. On the other hand, one might argue that both instances are newsworthy facts about the subjects, and to omit them would be inaccurrate.
:"Queen of Mean" is certainly a POV nickname, but Helmsley is unquestionably associated with it and hence it is encyclopedic IMO.  Are the same people who tagged the article as unreferenced the ones deleting the admittedly few that it had?  Rlquall 00:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've restored and improved the references. Jehochman  ☎ / ✔ 00:29, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was her birth name "Lena" (as is currently stated in the article) or "Leona"? Galena11 21:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per the reference, it was Lena. Jehochman  ☎ / ✔ 00:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth name? 

message: I removed this from the article as it did not have any citations.  Please see the warning above for articles on a living person and criticism. Morphh  (talk) 20:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This source is within a New York Times article that requires a paid subscription.  Does somebody subscribe to the NYT online? If you do, can you check this reference and restore the material if it checks out? Jehochman  ☎ / ✔ 15:07, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism

message: Does anyone have a person snapshot of Leona?  She passes through the lobby of her hotel all the time.  I've met her myself, but didn't think to take a photo. Jehochman  ☎ / ✔ 00:27, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would probably be best to use a photo from the time of her trial; judging by the picture here, you'd need to write a lengthy caption explaining why she looks that way today. -Ashley Pomeroy 23:14, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just emailed one of her friends to see if they can track one down. The mug shot from 1988 probably isn't the best.--Canoe1967 (talk) 09:53, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Make sure any new photo is properly licensed or it may get deleted. The mug shot in the infobox is not 100% necessary, but it will remain somewhere in the article. She was a famous individual before being convicted of any criminal charges, so the question of undue weight could very easily be argued to keep the mug shot out of the infobox (as in something like Phil Spector). Doc talk 10:08, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It had her holding the number sign for five years before I discovered it and cropped it out. I will help her friends with OTRS etc. I don't think many people realize that they can supply images with the permission/license of the copyright holders. Mrs. Helmsley's photos have little value now so her friends may just pay for a good one. There are nice ones with her dog that were taken by a pro that I may mention.--Canoe1967 (talk) 10:20, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

text: I'm with you all the way on getting another photo for the infobox. Other photos as well, properly licensed. I hope you can get them, as they will undoubtedly improve the article. Doc talk 10:23, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

text: I will wait a day or so on that email and then try others. I have helped quite a few get decent images licensed. One subject claims to have had her upload deleted 20+ times before we got it sorted with an email from her photographer to OTRS. Bill Gates still has his teenage mug in his article but I doubt he cares. Daryl Katz has a bad fan shot and no email. He lives near me and I may go kick on his door to see if he wants to pose for a better one. Most are happy to email them to me with photographer license emails attached. I just send them the form from commons OTRS.--Canoe1967 (talk) 10:44, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo needed

message: Is there a source that she was originally sentenced to decades in prison?  The reference I have--All Around the Town, by Patrick Bunyan, pp. 179-180--says she was sentenced to four years, which she began serving on April 15, 1992, and that she was released to "house confinement" on November 26, 1993, which would be 19 months by my count.   She could have been released from house arrest on January 1994, for a total of 21 months of punishment--not unusual for a four-year sentence. Nareek 17:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prison sentence 

message: I was reading a news story on her death  and found the following interesting, but they are not in this article:
:Before her son’s death of a heart attack in 1982, she told interviewers she would not talk about him “because terrible things can happen to people these days.”
:She evidently was referring to being knifed by robbers at her Palm Beach home in 1973. She was stabbed in the chest and suffered a collapsed lung, and Harry was wounded in the arm.
:After her son died, she sued the estate for money and property she said her son had borrowed, and an eviction notice was served on her son’s widow, Mimi.
:Mimi Panzirer said afterward that the legal costs wiped her out and “to this day I don’t know why they did it.”
Can someone add this, when they get the time? Bytebear  —The preceding  signed but undated. 
:I remember reading about this. Apparently the intent wasn't the legal victory, but to financially wipe out that family. This was referred to in an unflattering and overreaching comparison of Katherine Harris when she sued her grandfather's estate.
:--UnicornTapestry (talk) 16:02, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional information from news reports 

message: Thank you to the person who fixed my footnote (#9) and made some good edits to the article. I'm still rather clumsy and inexpert on Wikipedia. I agree above notes are interesting and hope someone will incorporate them, but I can't do...
67.117.144.5 20:20, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks to cleaner-upper

message: : Cardiovascular disease ran strong in her family, claiming the lives of her father, son and a sister.
Cardiovascular deaths shall be highly popular among people who have lived for 87 years. I mean you are supposed to die from any disease when you're 87 years old. You're are supposed to die from heart failure when you're 87 years old whether you have a family history or not. The above sentence may only be used to describe an untimely death. -- Toytoy 21:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cardiovascular deaths shall be highly popular among people who have lived for 87 years. -- Is that a pronouncement? I decline, thanks anyway. WiccaWeb 03:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of ''untimely'' death 

message: There is some really good biographical info in this "confidential presentence report" found here:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2007/0821071helmsley1.html
Some good background about her parents and family...
WiccaWeb 17:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio source 

message: I'm puzzled why one of the most famous headlines of all time "Rhymes With Rich" is constantly cut here.  Do a simple google on Rhyme With Rich Newsweek  Almost all the obituaries included it although on wikipedia it gets sanitized.  Americasroof 03:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rhymes With Rich

message: The New York Post article has to be mentioned by name in order for the graphic to stay according to fair use standards.  Americasroof 11:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NY Post has to be in article for the graphic to be used

message: I still have a copy of The Queen of Mean written during and after Leona's trial by New York Times Ransdall Pierson. It in, it said that Leona's animosity toward started Mimi was after Jay's death, she and a lawyer went into Jay's office and apparently did something which they refused to disclosed to Leona and Harry. Mimi claimed she was there to collect personal effect whereas the Helmsley thought she was doing a "power play", taking advantage of Jay's death.Xinivrae 13:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helmsley's hostility toward daughter-in-law 

message: The definition of "trivia" here at Wikipedia, as established in a number of discussions is exactly what the "In Popular Culture" section is. It's even in "bullet format". Such lists are "discouraged" but allowed. None the less, it fits the established definition of "trivia", should be labeled as such, and carry the "trivia" info tag. The fact is, calling the list here in *THIS* article "In Popular Culture" is disingenuous. As to "consensus", that is decided on an individual basis by case, not Wikipedia wide, and there has been no "consensus" discussion here. The relevant issue is applicability of an allowed definition. And, an honest view is the information in the "In Popular Culture" section is in fact random factoids - in other words, "trivia". Again, "Trivia" is a valid and allowable section title for which there is absolutely zero Wikipedia-wide "consensus" against. Seriously, don't argue Wikipedia-wide consensus pro-"In Popular Culture" as an acceptable synonym for "trivia" unless you have a policy-level discussion to back it up (there is none). =//= Johnny Squeaky 06:14, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: As to the "off topic" comment left on my personal talk page: Discussions about me are entirely irrelevant to discussions about "trivia". You may attempt to change or deflect the discussion away from the actual topic, but in we are talking about "trivia" not "Johnny Squeaky". =//= Johnny Squeaky 06:51, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid when an editor has caused so much disruption and been repeatedly blocked for the same thing over and over you will find yourself as the topic. You have no consensus. Span (talk) 14:32, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

text: Just face it nobody agrees with you. So far you are the only one who wants to change it vs. SummerPhd and myself. I'm not sure if Spanglej was voting against you or just commenting on your intolerable behavior. If it was info such as.. Leona Helmsley eats chocolate ice cream. Then I would agree with you that it is trivia, but the section talks about her in "popular culture". I don't know what your obsession is with trivia (nor do I care), but edit warring, calling people who edit against you vandals, and harassing people on their talk page is not going to gain you any allies in your crusade. TheycallmetheDoctor (talk) 06:52, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia 

message: "Queen of Mean": "Lawyer Alan Dershowitz said he once had breakfast with Leona at one of the Helmsley hotels and the waiter brought him a cup of tea with a tiny bit of water spilled on the saucer. Dershowitz says Leona grabbed the cup from him and smashed it on the floor, then demanded that the waiter get down on his hands and knees and beg for his job.
Helmsley had a barbecue pit constructed for her home. The work was performed by Eugene Brennan, a personal friend of Jeremiah McCarthy, the chief engineer of Helmsley-Spear. When the final bill came to $13,000, she refused to pay, citing shoddy workmanship. When McCarthy pleaded with her to honor the bill, citing the favor done on his behalf and informing her that Brennan had six children to support, Helmsley replied, "Why didn't he keep his pants on? Then he wouldn't need the money."" 89.8.208.116 (talk) 20:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I just removed the section that has been reverted - without explanation. The two stories removed might in one or more contexts in this article, be able to illustrate a point of two. However, "Queen of Mean" is not an encyclopedic title. The section is hardly anything more than a "This person had a nasty personality, and here are two stories that illustrate this" section. 178.232.18.97 (talk) 17:41, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic section and title 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Leona Helmsley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070221094159/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n22_v45/ai_14667462/print to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n22_v45/ai_14667462/print
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930181205/http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/scams/leona_helmsley/ to http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/scams/leona_helmsley/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:33, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Leona Helmsley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070904201441/http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/scams/leona_helmsley/index.html to http://www.crimelibrary.com/criminal_mind/scams/leona_helmsley/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070128102701/http://www.bartleby.com/66/43/27743.html to http://www.bartleby.com/66/43/27743.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090126075802/http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gQKFOg8YfmiYwwug0HfcW6qz2Cdg to http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5gQKFOg8YfmiYwwug0HfcW6qz2Cdg
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This could probably go under pop culture. 2604:3D09:D78:1000:1075:CB3:E575:5AA1 (talk) 15:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The song "rich man's world" by immortal technique includes a shout out to Leona.