lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Experimental Media and Performing Arts Center

message: I changed the reference of the Architect to Grimshaw Architects from Nicholas Grimshaw & Partners, and a reference to the Royal College of Art, because that building was not realised.
Suodrak (talk) 21:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What style would you call it? Blobitecture? —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 03:01, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See here: http://words.shaneburger.com/index.php/2010/02/22/empac-the-instrument/ Iamdooser (talk) 20:32, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architectural style? 

message: I am asking us to find out how this building helps scientists and engineers be more successful at "solving complex problems". It seems to me that it does not make most RPI students more competitive in their major. Any info folks? Does MIT have such a building that engineers actually use?--Lindamcca (talk) 04:18, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this building just about showbiz
Talk:Samuel Maharero

message: I would like to add an external link <http://www.namibia-1on1.com/Namibia-Central/Okahandja-5.html> Plus Link <http://www.namibia-1on1.com/Namibia-Northern/Herero-Uprising.html> Plus Link <http://www.namibia-1on1.com/Namibia-Northern/Battle-of-Waterberg.html>The articles have been researched and have an 'Acknowledgement and Further Reading' link to an accrediations page on the Namibia-1on1 site showing sources of reference along with ISBN numbers where available. Are there any objections or suggestions?
Keith Irwin 14:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:DABCO

message: This compound (page name) should not be listed under its trademarked name, but rather the most common compound name (triethylenediamine). I don't know how to change page names or if changing that text causes problems with links.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JLeditor (talk • contribs) 20:51, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: DABCO is the common name.  I've never heard a chemist call it anything else.  Per WP:COMMONNAME, this article shouldn't be renamed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.139.57.253 (talk) 22:37, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  European chemists tend to refer to the compound as triethylenediamine, and it is necessarily marketed under that name by Air Products' competitors, who cannot use the DABCO name. 206.16.109.32 (talk) 22:18, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a splitting of the two "N-centered" HOMO's of 2.1 eV because of interaction of the lone electron pairs with the C-C sigma- and  C-C sigma* - MO of the ethylbridge. This is one of the classical examples for through bond and through space interactions described by the extended hückel theory.
-maybe someone whose english is better than mine and who is a bit more into the topic should be adding that. here's a source:
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/v01-201
cheers phil's IP--90.136.118.240 (talk) 09:10, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: HOMO splitting

message: DABCO is the GENERIC trademark from Air Products for their line of additives for polyurethane.
This article refers to triethylenediamine, cas # 280-57-9 in its pure form (crystals). The Air Products name for it is DABCO Crystalline.
The Air Products technical data sheet can be found here:  http://www.airproducts.com/~/media/downloads/d/dabco-crystalline/data-sheets/en-dabco-crystalline-datasheet-140-11-050.pdf?industryItem=Home%20Root&subIndustryItem=industries&segment=RubberPlastics&applicationChildItem=Elastomers&productLevel3=Dabco-Crystalline  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.29.62.199 (talk) 17:47, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  DABCO 

message: Yes, both terms already appeared as other names in the , but that's not a place that lay readers would necessarily know to look. Nor does it render them particularly prominent. Furthermore, the controversy here on the talk page about how the article should be titled suggests that we had some way to go in rendering the article more user-friendly. So I made the edit per both Wikipedia's principal of least astonishment and its manual of style.—PaulTanenbaum (talk) 13:08, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added both ''triethylenediamine'' and ''TEDA'' to the lead
Talk:Daidzein

message: I added an internal link to phytoestrogens.  This may avoid having to duplicate referrences for biologic effect.  Maybe this article shoul concentrate on the chemical aspects?Pustelnik 02:25, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phytoestrogens 

message: Directly from the article:
:Activation of PPARs
What are PPARs? Should be spelled out in full the first time it's used, with the acronym following in parentheses. After that's done once, using the acronym is fine.
:Isoflavone daidzein transactivates all three PPAR[clarification needed] isoforms, α, δ, and γ and influences target cells.[4] 
"Influencing target cells" is almost meaningless. Influences them how? In vitro or in vivo?
:Similar to another isoflavone genistein,[5] daidzein at concentrations between 1 and 100 uM activates PPARs in a dose dependent way in KS483 mesenchymal progenitor cells, breast cancer MCF-7 cells, T47D cells and MDA-MD-231 cells.
This almost has to be in vitro cell culture work, right? Then say so please.
:Studies have shown that both ERs and PPARs influence each other and therefore induce differential effects in a dose-dependent way. The final biological effects of daidzein are determined by the balance among these pleiotrophic actions.[4][6]
What effects are being referred to here? What are ERs? (Same acronym issue as with PPARs.) What "pleiotrophic" actions?
I have a Ph.D. in nutrition from the University of Minnesota, and during my grad school and postdoc years, soy isoflavones were all the rage among nutrition researchers, though I focused on appetite & memory (neuroscience). With a background and education like mine, why am I unable to read this article? Was it written by biochemists or molecular biologists for the exclusive use of their peers? That's what journals are for, though of course journals also require authors to define their acronyms and specialized terms up front. It's not difficult to write this kind of article for a broader audience, which is Wikipedia's readership.Dcs002 (talk) 22:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Define acronyms and specialty jargon plz
Talk:Danazol

message: added a mention of an obscure case report from 1981 about danazol being used in the treatment of breast gigantism secondary to D-penicillamine use. It was reinserted after I objected that this was a primary source that did not meet the criteria outlined in WP:MEDRS. Yes, of course primary sources are sometimes allowed but this is quite clearly a case where this is not applicable. The case report is not cited in Web of Science, and there are strongly persuasive reasons why it is of no relevance today - penicillamine is only used for a very small number of medical conditions (and it completely outmoded in rheumatoid arthritis), and I don't think many women would be prepared to take a drug clearly associated with liver tumours. JFW | T@lk 19:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I am for disclosing any side effect of any medication. All side effects need to be documented. Its not in web of science, its cataloged in pub med, which is of high quality. I am for compromise in this case.Lucy346 (talk) 21:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

text: I will leave this edit out. Lucy346 (talk) 22:17, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breast gigantism
Talk:1,8-Diazabicyclo(5.4.0)undec-7-ene

message: There seems to be something wrong about the educt's name as well as the number of carbon atoms throughout the synthesis' mechanism.79.204.224.125 (talk) 10:53, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what the problem is that you see, but perhaps you are confused by the fact that the chemical name is derived from undecene which implies eleven carbon atoms, but the article describes a chemical with only nine carbon atoms.  This is because the "diaza" part of the name indicates that two carbon atoms have been replaced by two nitrogen atoms.  I hope this helps, -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:00, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

text: You're right, Mr. no-nickname. There is considerable confusion. Reaction scheme image (at least its original version; UPDATE: I've fixed it quickly, afterwards) has incorrect name for the substrate structure (pimelic aldehyde), "suberic aldehyde". Obviously, pimelic aldehyde is wrong as well, as one carbon would be lost during simple primary amine / aldehyde condensation (+ reduction). The correct substrate should be adipic aldehyde. (Probably just a structure drawing mistake. At least the name do they have correct in the paper (Regalado), „… reductive amination of adipaldehyde with the well known propane-1,3-diamine …“)  —Mykhal (talk) 11:47, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Discrepancy?
Talk:Decalin

message: The article talks about “a two-fold rotational symmetry axis going through the center of the 9–10 bond”, presumably referring to the numbering of the carbon chain. However, as the article Bicyclic molecule states, “bicyclic molecules have a strict nomenclature. [...] Numbering of the carbon chain always begins at one bridgehead atom (where the rings meet) [...]”. In this nomenclature, if I understand it correctly, the rotational symmetry axis therefore would go through the center of the 1–6 bond. Since this half sentence is somewhat trivial, anyway, - of course the axis goes through the center of the molecule - I will therefore remove it. ◄ Sebastian 09:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  9–10 bond 

message: The ball-and-stick model of cis-decalin shows it in a double-boat conformation, which I highly doubt to be the ground state. Indeed it is very much possible for it to be in a double-chair conformation, which I highly suppose to be the lowest energy conformation. A quick check using MMFF94 force field gives a whopping energy difference of about 36kJ/mol. Any thoughts on that?
--NielsKarschin (talk) 14:18, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  cis-Decalin conformation 

message: Under trans-decalin, Figures 5 and 6 are referred to, but the article doesn't have Figures 5 and 6 ??? 99.167.202.76 (talk) 23:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There's also a parenthetical reference to a bond shown in blue that does not appear anywhere in any figures. Was there some substantial deletion of content from this article at some point? Lumberjane Lilly (talk) 14:02, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figures 5 and 6 

message: Who first made it? When was it first used? No history on it. Going to check my printed dictionary now. --Mark v1.0 (talk) 00:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Decane

message: The odor is described as Oil of U. Rigida (oil of ulva rigida).  This does not make sense.  See http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/gca/gc1593591.html, which gives an analysis of this oil.  Note the presence of benzenethiazole, 2,3-butanediol, (E,Z)-2,4-decadien-1-al, among others, all which have a substantial odor compared to decane.  Decane is most likely odorless.
JSR (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Odor
Talk:Deferoxamine

message: Deferoxamine also helps recovery from nerve damage. I wish I had time to add the study to this article, but it can be found on the internet. P)erhaps a less busy person can help to add it into the main article.
65.101.231.48 (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Also Helps Nerve Damage

message: In a study, published last week in the journal Applied Geochemistry, the scientists suggest rare earth metals could be mined from the solid nodes of iron and manganese found strewn across much of the deep ocean floor.
These nodules, called ferromanganese deposits, build slowly over time as dissolved iron and manganese in seawater attaches to seafloor sediments.
Using the solvent desferrioxamine-B — a key ingredient of the method they have developed—these elements could be easily extracted.
The diluter binds more strongly to some metals than others and when applied to ferromanganese nodes, effectively and efficiently extracts rare earth metals, leaving other metals behind in the nodules.
http://www.mining.com/scientists-find-way-to-extract-vast-amounts-of-rare-earths-from-seafloor-73254/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephen w Herbert (talk • contribs) 15:00, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deferoxamine used to recover rare earth mineral from sea floor 

message: When I import the SMILES in Avogadro the carboxyl groups are replaced by hydroxyl groups. Any suggestions?
Simon de Danser (talk) 06:47, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  SMILES
Talk:Deguelin

message: Probable typo: The IUPAC name has 3,4-b:6',5'-3 where the other names have 3,4-b:6',5'-e.
69.72.92.17 (talk) 05:02, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  IUPAC name 
Talk:Dehydroalanine

message: The following disputed statement was removed by me today:
"Dehydroalanine (DHA) residues are also found in food proteins, including casein, which have been heated in the presence of a base such as sodium hydroxide. Bases can dehydrate serine to form DHA." --Smokefoot (talk) 02:18, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I overhauled the  section and re-added with ref (Friedman) the general idea of non-enzymatic formation during food preparation. The ref as I added it is for a whole paragraph, supporting all ideas in it. Feel free to add ref tags to separate statements in it if you think it would be clearer. DMacks (talk) 16:14, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Derived from serine with base...
Talk:Dehydroascorbic acid

message: The article mostly refers to ascorbic acid. Hence it should be integrated there. Ohterwise delete it!--Yikrazuul 13:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following reference gives no publication information and a very quick search turned up nothing
so it may have been neither peer reviewed nor published.
Kitt, D.Q. (2012), Topical Dehydroascorbic Acid (Oxidized Vitamin C) Permeates Stratum Corneum More Rapidly Than Ascorbic Acid, retrieved 2012-07-31 
Housecarl (talk) 00:24, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Kitt (2012) apears to be unpublished
Template talk:User WikiProject Anglicanism

message: I saw the addition to the user box upon my return and didn't think too much of it at first, but it seems to make a claim of change in focus of the project: excluding churches and articles not in the communion proper. This would need to be the result of a wide reaching consensus. AFAIK, it has not even been suggested yet - which is not to say that I would not support that at some time in the future if the threatened schism proves profound and lasting. --Secisek (talk) 04:50, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Anglican Communion
Talk:The Blazing Sun (1954 film)

message: How would one add in the vowels?  ṣrʿ fī al-wdī
--gren グレン 21:06, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean the strict transliteration? I have added it to the article.  -- Anas Talk? 12:09, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transliteration 
Talk:Al Adamson

message: Does anybody know, why the date of death is mentioned in June although imdb lists August 2? 
If there is no protest, I plan to change this after a weak of waiting. --Baumfreund-FFM (talk) 05:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have checked the references. Only one of them is readable for free. This one says Adamson was found in August several weeks after being reported missing. So the imdb date isnt plausible. --Baumfreund-FFM (talk) 04:17, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:Anglican Episcopal Church of Brazil

message: A proposal is being floated at the project page that there be a  standard format for organising each article about national provinces of the Anglican Communion, including this one. Please consider participating in the straw vote and discussion. Cheers! Fishhead64 21:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uniform format proposal

message: Apart from the Traditional Anglican Communion, the article should really consider verifying whether groups within the Anglican Episcopal Church of Brazil have ever sought a similar canonical structure to the proposed personal ordinariates. ADM (talk) 18:08, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk:Personal Ordinariate
Talk:Tsumeb

message: Iwould like to add external links: <http://www.namibia-1on1.com/Namibia-Map/Tsumeb-Map-01.html> Plus <http://www.namibia-1on1.com/Namibia-Northern/Tsumeb-Mine.html>
Are there any objections?
Keith Irwin 14:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

message: To the frustrated contributor: Please don't go away. We value your input. Please take the time to find the reference that supports your claim. I think you are corerct but you will have to prove it- BEEFART Captainbeefart 14:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the name

message: I'll edit the "Minerals" section.  Here is a sign on the wall in the National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, April 2014.  I don't know how to cite it, please someone add the reference somehow.
"The variety and beauty of minerals from Tsumeb, Namibia, are unsurpassed.  More than 170 mineral species have been discovered there--20 found nowhere else.  What created this enormous diversity?
The original sulfide mineral deposit contained a rich variety of metals.  It was altered by oxygen-rich groundwater, producing a host of new minerals.
Since about 1900, Tsumeb has been an important producer of the metals copper, lead, zinc, cadmium, and germanium." 
Jerry-VA (talk) 15:15, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: 170 Mineral Species, 20 Found Nowhere Else
Talk:Dermorphin

message: I remember reading somewhere once upon a time that dermorphin has been found by researchers at Johnson and Johnson to be in the urine and blood of autistic and (if I remember correctly) schizophrenic people.  One source I stumbled into once upon a time claims that 90% of the autistic and shizophrenic patients tested positive for dermorphin in their blood, the levels of which dropped to undetectable levels when wheat and dairy products were removed from the diet.  The hypothesis is something on the order of a bacteria, fungus, or enzyme takes root in the gut and splices the casein and gluten proteins into a variety of substances, including, unfortunately, dermorphin.  Here are some urls that resulted from a google search for "dermorphin" and "autism".  Something about this should make it into the article, I would think.  Given the potential importance this research might have, it should be mentioned somewhere in this article by someone more qualified than myself to write it.  At least mention that it is a hot topic of research....
http://www.vancesfoods.com/autism.htm
http://www.healing-arts.org/children/autism-overview.htm
http://www.bbbautism.com/pdf/article_14_why_does_gfcf_work.pdf  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.108.90.211 (talk) 22:48, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I randomly stumbled upon this article while walking from a pain medication I take, and the lack of detail struck me as odd.  There are clinical trials from 25 years ago claiming this is some amazing drug 30 times stronger than morphine, with lower rates of addiction.  However, if this were actually true, there would have been a whirlwind of research in the years following it.  I only deal with moderate acute recurrent pain so it's not relevant to me directly, but there are other people for whom pain management and addiction are both paramount issues.
Anyway, the dearth of information suggests to me that either the initial studies were exaggerated and/or flawed (possibly biased in favor of big pharma), or else fatal side effects were discovered in humans; yet there is a remarkable paucity of data online.  I'm curious about what happened and why there's next to nothing in the literature on this drug being explored further.
(Additionally frightening, a quick search suggests it seems to be unregulated at present in the US, and works in the microgram range.  I can imagine addicts ordering this drug through a chemistry store for a quick high, and then dying of extremely high overdosing.  This really doesn't seem logical.) TricksterWolf (talk) 19:07, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Information? 

message: Would the peptide demorphin show up on a urine drugscreen? Allpaws1111 (talk) 17:57, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demorphin and drug screens
Talk:Desflurane

message: Articles indicate that desflurane undergoes negligible metabolism, which is perhaps more correct than stating that this drug is not metabolized. This is of particular importance when considering hepatotoxicity. Njoku D et.al. state that desflurane undergoes biotransformation when exposed to hepatic cytochrome P450, rendering metabolites that can trigger immunologic hepatitis in patients; such a case is described by Berghaus et.al.  Baitisj (talk) 02:13, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Pharmacology
Talk:Dextran

message: I increased the span of molecular weights of dextran. The previous values were 10 to 150 kDa and, although attached to fluorescent probes, there are dextrans that are both shorter and much longer than that (for a list of the probes I base this on, see http://www.invitrogen.com/search/global/searchAction.action?resultPage=1&resultsPerPage=15&query=dextran&show_seproductcategorynavigator=true&show_productcategorynavigator=true&show_taxonomynavigator=true&show_brandnavigator=true&show_sedocumenttypenavigator=true )  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hakkman (talk • contribs) 10:32, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The drawing of dextran suggests that the glucose monomers are C7's insofar as vertices = carbon. The bit at the glycosidic bond is deceptive. So I am going to redraw it.--Smokefoot (talk) 00:52, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Drawing unclear
Talk:Ditungsten tetra(hpp)

message: OK, so we don't need to mention the 18-electron calculation, but should we at least mention the quadruple bond between the two tungsten centers?—Tetracube (talk) 23:37, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quadruple bond

message: Couldn't one lower the ionization energy of this molecule even further by sticking methyl, trimethylsilyl or other electropositive groups onto the hpp ligands? I'm wondering if it might be possible to make the ionization energy arbitrarily small this way, or if there is a theoretical minimum. Stonemason89 (talk) 03:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. The practical problem is usually that the modified ligands are often tricky to make, and highly basic ligands are difficult to deprotonate.  All sorts of problems arise when one modifies ligands - they become too bulky, they do outer sphere redox, they become fragile, etc, but that's life for molecule makers. Now in terms of "arbitrarily" lowering the IP, I dnt think so  You'd reach a limit pretty soon, in part because the effects of substituents are so attenuated (the redox center is the W2 unit).  My impression is that this game has been played before with metallocenes, polyaminobenzenes and other systems. But good idea if you can devise a weaker binucleating, monoprotic acid than guanidines. --Smokefoot (talk) 03:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: How to lower the ionization energy
Talk:Diallyl disulfide

message: agree with above comment. Housewives are the only other people that commonly cook?? Please remove; this is such a ridiculous statement
125.24.143.205 (talk) 10:13, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Diammonium phosphate

message: What's all this about the phosphorus requirements of Minnesota's crops? It looks like a direct copy paste from somewhere... I'll remove it as it doesn't really do anything for the article.71.224.136.30 (talk) 21:14, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the (second) link in "further reading" that claims to take you to a manufacture and production chart currently redirects to a malicious website. 157.211.78.17 (talk) 02:11, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks 157.211.78.17. I have removed the link. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  scam in link