Talk:Bonneville Dam

message: *Direct link to search query for public domain images by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
*U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Digital Visual Library
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jholman (talk • contribs) 00:46, May 30, 2004 
:HABS photos now linked in article are public domain and can be uploaded. doncram (talk) 02:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: Can someone please add the status of the old lock to the article.  Was it shut down, or did it continue to operate for smaller vessels?--J Clear 16:19, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The usual suspects: so much to edit, so little time; lack of inspiration; figured someone more familiar with it would have the answer already, etc.--J Clear 18:10, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Lock? 

message: I added new NRHP text and photo references which may contain substantial new info for editing into the article.   Also, I added a 76 HABS "data pages" link whose description is another major new source of material. doncram (talk) 02:14, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New material

message: Does it really belong (equally) to both Oregon and Washington as suggested by the templates on the talk page and by the categories? It must be under some sort of administration/supervising by one of the states. I can't image it is by both... --141.30.94.37 (talk) 19:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The WikiProject templates don't indicate ownership, just that the subject of the article is of interest to both states, since it spans the river between them. According to the article, the dam is administered by the federal Army Corps of Engineers and the federal/regional Bonneville Power Administration. Katr67 (talk) 19:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: To further answer your question, things seem to be administered from the Oregon side of the river, from Bonneville, Oregon, though I believe the State of Oregon has little jurisdiction over the place. I'm not sure how much infrastructure is in Washington. The dam is "in" both states however. Katr67 (talk) 20:19, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I was mainly curious about who has jurisdiction about it. Even if it "is" in both states there must one of them responsible in case of trouble. Since they're listed as National Historic Landmarks for both states for example I'm wondering if it really is listed as being in both states or whether they national historic landmarks will be "assigned" to whatever state they happen to have their jurisdiction. Same with Registered Historic Place... --141.30.94.37 (talk) 14:46, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washington and/or Oregon? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Bonneville Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060414112844/http://news.yahoo.com:80/s/ap/20060331/ap_on_sc/smart_sea_lion to http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060331/ap_on_sc/smart_sea_lion
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bonneville Dam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080106150659/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1959&ResourceType=District to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1959&ResourceType=District
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011032429/http://www.bpa.gov/corporate/ to http://www.bpa.gov/corporate/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved - technically this is an uncontested revert of an undiscussed move back to its original title.  Polyamorph (talk) 05:59, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Bonneville Locks and Dam →  – Requesting a revert of a controversial move made twice by  without a discussion or the courtesy to follow WP:PCM. "Bonneville Dam" is the common name for the complex and has over 1,000 hits on The Oregonian website compared to zero for "Bonneville Locks and Dam", which is itself an incorrect name. The official name for the complex, used by the Army Corps of Engineers, does not pluralize "Locks"; this name gets less than 50 hits from The Oregonian. SounderBruce 03:45, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 October 2023