lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Christianity and Judaism/Archive 4

message: Hi all,  In a recent lecture Bishop Michael Nazir Ali claimed that in the ancient world there was a great deal of Jewish evangelism - thus Matthew 23:15 (You travel over land and sea to win a single convert ...) is speaking of what was commonplace.  But I have not seen any other reference.  Anyone know any sources for or against this assertion?  Springnuts 20:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evangelism 

message: What is the source for this caim: "Based on the oral law, they understand that Judaism demands the same selflessness as that of the "Christian love" mentioned above?" Slrubenstein   |  Talk 12:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  request for source 

message: The link to Ruth should be disambiguated to Ruth. -Amillar 23:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 23:19, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation 

message: I removed a piece of text that used a statement from the Talmud about finishing ones work before going to see a supposed messiah to illustrate the fact that belief in God is not as central an idea as obeying God.  It was completely irrelevant, because Jews do not view the messiah as a deity. (Lisa Liel) 98.193.75.57 14:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  God vs. Messiah 

message: This article was moved without a move proposal or talk page discussion and I wanted to see if anyone else had concerns with the move. That rationale was that of alphabatizing, but there can be arguments that Judaism should go first (it is chronologically first, plus the very common phrase "Judeo-Christian" is not "Christy-Jew"). Any other thoughts? Is there any more rationale for the recent move?-Andrew c [talk] 00:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree renaming the page without discussion was arbitrary and capricious, or just plain old POV.  AWB was then used to change all the links.  The historical "Judeo-Christian" usage is common practice.  This move and related AWB changes should be reverted. RichardF 01:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Talk:Somerset Island (Nunavut)

message: I split apart Somerset Island and Fort Ross into this article and Fort Ross, Nunavut. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:34, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  name change 

message: Somerset Island was occupied by the Idlout family into the 1990s, with the exception of the winter of 1974-75. They lived at Creswell Bay. My family was very close with the Idlouts, and my father wrote this obituary when Timothy Idlout died: http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic46-1-96.pdf
The article could stand to be corrected.
:Not so much corrected as the island is uninhabited but updated. You should go for it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try to find some time this weekend. - CW  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.70.37.222 (talk) 15:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracy re: occupancy 
Talk:Christoffel Brändli

message: I have updated this article with additional content. Some parts of his biography were taken from the subject's German Wikipedia page. Darwin Naz (talk) 23:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Athletics at the 1988 Summer Olympics – Women's javelin throw

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SFB 19:06, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Jewish General Hospital

message: I have just looked at this article for the first time and wondered why it is so short? Then I looked at the article history and found that 95% (as per the byte count) was deleted on October 23 (2007). I understand why changes were necessary - the article history states that the deleted material was a copy/paste of a JGH publicity website. However I think the baby has been thrown out with the bathwater here, as the website does contain many facts of interest which could be rewritten. Can someone go through the previous version, select the important information and summarize it with a neutral viewpoint (NPOV)? The idea would be to produce a worthwhile encyclopedia article which is not a "long advertisement", as stated on July 12 (2007).  Dirac66 22:17, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Can someone summarize the deleted material?

message: # As the name implies, this is a General Hospital. 
# Some one please add the emergency department, there is one. I have personally been treated there. Peter Horn 18:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing info in box 

message: Can somebody kindly demonstrate an actual reason, verifiable in reliable sources, why Wikipedia needs an independent article on Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, as a separate topic from the main one on Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital? Bearcat (talk) 03:35, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge tags 

message: This section simply appears to be miswritten, is one of the six a part of one of the others?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.229.175.116 (talk) 23:16, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The LDI currently supports five major research axes (or programs)" Lists six programs
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Organizations/Archive 1

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.  Badbilltucker 22:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: The following needs to be put in for each organization, IMO. They are name, established, list of presidents, list of awards (including winners), list of publications, headquarters, list of conferences, list of executive directors (vice presidents), and official websites. Chris 16:03, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, a good idea to create a standard for organization articles (I couldn't find discussions yet on this topic, must I think there must be some..). I created a new subproject to centralize discussion and added your contribution: Formats for organization articles. Brz7 23:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Items for organizations
Talk:Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations

message: There is this newish group called J Street. Is it considered part of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations? --John Bahrain (talk) 17:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is [[J Street]] a member of the Conference? 
Talk:Emma Clarke

message: According to an interview in the 11-17 December 2010 issue of Radio Times, she wasn't sacked by London Underground is 2007 and indeed still works for them. Pelago (talk) 21:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still working for London Underground 

message: Emma has released a single featuring the spoof Underground announcements. Is that something to add to the article, maybe? 94.64.249.140 (talk) 10:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music single 
Talk:System integration

message: I doubt the German reference is talking about the same subject, can somebody confirm and fix this?
Erik78 (talk) 10:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  German version covers something completely different 

message: What is the relevance of the first citation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.28.41.227 (talk) 20:11, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor article 

message: The quality of this article is low and there is a lack of citation throughout. I've moved an entire section here:—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.89.0.118 (talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 21:32, June 12, 2008.
This article needs a lot of work.  Very limited in content one section also appears to have bias towards use of Enterprsie Service Bus for Horizontal Integration -- ESB has no shortage of costs and administration built into it and is certainly not the only Horizontal Integration approach.  Gulliver001 (talk) 16:19, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor article 

message: Under "Required skills" there is a statement about an "Eric Wick", who "developed a matrix template in 2010 to assess the capabilities of integrators interested in pursuing careers in the field."
No reference, no citation...
Besides this being an insider reference, this information is of no use...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.118.59.201 (talk) 21:32, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is "Eric Wick" 

message: I found this article to be rather Information Technology orientated when I was expecting the article to detail the work of systems integration in control engineering.  Although the two are obviously related, my experience is that an S.I. is someone involved in software/hardware control systems, typically programming a SCADA system to deal with PLCs in industry.  
This is obviously very POV-ish because I work in control engineering, but I was expecting to find an article that was either more orientated towards what we do, or written in more generalist terms.  Am I alone in this opinion? Or am I assuming too much importance to the control engineering branch? SheffGruff (talk) 10:23, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Control SI
Talk:Sex and Zen II

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.lovehkfilm.com/reviews_2/sex_and_zen_2.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 16:59, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Fajja

message: Khalidi actually writes that the school had 781 students by the mid-40´s. This seems awfully high, in a place with 1,570 inhabitants.  It could of course have students from the areas around, or it is a Khalidi-typo. The Pal. rem. site say that it had 181 students; that sounds far more likely, Huldra (talk) 23:31, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typos, ce
Talk:24 Commando Royal Engineers

message: There's no clear information about 56 Squadron/56 Commando Squadron or such similar names. A dubious record on http://british-army-units1945on.co.uk/royal-engineers/squadrons/56-squadron.html states deployment on Op Herrick (UK involvement in Afghanistan) in 2011 but such deployments isn't mentioned, as all Herrick deployments are, on UK MOD websites. Is it always on paper? Again no clear source, only on dubious blogs.
Sammartinlai (talk) 05:42, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Further comment: Going through the archives of the Royal Navy website from 2008 onwards, there's no mention of a 56 Squadron, only 59 and 131. So it didn't exist then. "Still on paper?" No clear source that says this. Sammartinlai (talk) 06:15, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  56 Squadron
Talk:Comity

message: Various legislatures have rules regarding how members may speak of members, debates, and actions of coordinate houses (in a bicameral system) or other branches of government, and these are often referred to as rules of comity or "comity between the Houses". These rules might include, for example, using circumlocutions such as "another place" or "the other body", or identifying members of the other house by title rather than by name.  207.180.169.36 (talk) 02:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  As parliamentary procedure 

message: Hello, over the upcoming weeks I will be editing this page. GEMgirl12 (talk) 21:38, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intention to Edit 

message: Comity is far from being equal to comitas gentium (international courtesy, wd|Q9195595). The redirect should be deleted.Szilas (talk) 06:19, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistaken redirect
Talk:QF 3-inch 20 cwt

message: What does the "20 cwt" refer to?  Gene Nygaard 22:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have expanded the introduction to explain this. Feel free to improve the explanation if it is not clear. The purpose of these gun articles is to make the technical details accessible to everybody in as simple language as possible, so feedback on the explanations is always good. Rcbutcher 08:45, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Obvious question unanswered

message: What does "QF" signify? DuncanHill (talk) 22:38, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another obvious question unanswered 

message: The article says "20 cwt referred to the weight of the barrel and breech, to differentiate it from other "3 inch" guns (1 cwt = 1 hundredweight = 112 lb, hence the barrel and breech together weighed 2250 lb" - but 20cwt, or 20x112 lb, is 2240 lb. DuncanHill (talk) 22:41, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed it to 2240 lb. DuncanHill (talk) 22:43, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight
Talk:Protein farnesyltransferase

message: Is this maybe a duplicate to Farnesyltransferase?--Natr (talk) 14:23, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it does appear to be.  I have therefore proposed that these articles be merged.  Boghog (talk) 06:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  duplicate? 

message: * Support – The subject matter () of both articles appears to be identical. Since the official IUBMB enzyme name is protein farnesyltransferase, I think farnesyltransferase should be merged into this article. Boghog (talk) 06:42, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Organizations/Archive 3

message: Conspiracy Con (a convention, which is categorized under :category:organizations) has been nominated for deletion--even after extensive sourcing. Please give your comments/vote. Thanks. -Eερ² (t|c) 22:13, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conspiracy Con AfD 

message: Resolved
:: --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  updated --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:45, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion: Alpha Iota Delta 

message: Resolved
:: --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:53, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  updated --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:22, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion: DargonZine 

message: Resolved
:: --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 00:19, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  updated --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:21, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Articles for Deletion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of groups referred to as cults (all) 

message: :: --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  updated --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:53, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion: Committee of 300 

message: :: --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:34, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  updated --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:54, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion review: JAMAA
Talk:Filártiga v. Peña-Irala

message: jurisdiction is not  so clear-cut as this article portrays.  As I understand it, "tag" jurisdiction, which I think is what was used here, is poorly regarded both domestically and internationally.  As a result, the italicized nature of the word "did" is misleading and inappropriate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.252.255.129 (talk) 14:23, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Power Sword

message: In accordance with good language style, the shorter name (Power Sword) should be used in the article. It also suggests to the reader that the subject of the article is the entirety of this weapon's history, starting with the split version from the early minicomics where the name Power Sword was first used. Please don't move the article to "The Sword of Power" or perform global search-and-replace actions. PointDread 22:51, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can get some images of the Classic He-Man sword and also She-Ra's sword. Someone will have to help out with the newer incarnations.--NeilEvans (talk) 13:42, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "The Power Sword" vs. "The Sword of Power"

message: I've added some infoboxes for the swords. How do people like them? At the moment they are only on my sandbox and not yet in the Template namespace. If people like them it can be transferred to the template namespace and used across all articles relating to fictional artifacts. Any suggestions for changes to the infobox or fields missing that you think should be added please let me know.--NeilEvans (talk) 14:26, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infoboxes 

message: In the Filmation cartoon there was an episode called The Masks of Power in which two characters are taken over by the evil spirits of an ancient king and his queen. The king and queen then search for a powerful ancient artifact called the Sword of the Ancients, which the Sorceress tells He-Man that next to the Power Sword it is the most powerful weapon on Eternia. When the sword is finally discovered it is revealed that it was destined to join with another powerful sword, which is said to be the Power Sword which it immediately joins with. I have no evidence to confirm this, but this does seem to be an adaptation of the earlier story from the mini-comics. In fact in the episode Skeletor does hold the Power Sword while He-Man holds the Sword of the Ancients right before the two join.
Even though this can not be confirmed as an adaption of the earlier story of the sword, it may still be worth noting in the article that the two were merged (without suggesting this merging is a nod to the minicomics), though it does not appear to have granted any enhanced strength or powers to He-man.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.181.77.179 (talk) 00:12, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sword of the Ancients
Talk:David Atlanta

message: Is the name of the magazine David Atlanta or just David? The article uses both and I couldn't tell from the website or the cover picture in the infobox.  EnviroboyTalkCs 05:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 
Talk:Deseret Book Company

message: In the article section Deseret Book#Excel Entertainment Group it currently says:
Shortly after the merger between the two record labels, many of the recording artists on the new Shadow Mountain label were dropped from their contract.
BUT the supplied reference does not support this. For now I have added a CITE NEEDED tag. 104.32.193.6 (talk) 00:33, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dropped Artists CITE needed. 

message: Since the article covers all three divisions of the Deseret Book Company, that should be the article's name. Deseret Management Company , the Encyclopedia of Mormonism , and the company's own About page  use "Deseret Book Company". Deseret Book, although it is used extensively for branding, is only part of the whole company. It is easy to change the name of the article and redirect Deseret Book to it. The text will have to be updated however. Since this change is something that people could get upset with, I would appreciate a discussion to approve the move. Mnnlaxer (talk) 04:19, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with the idea of switching to the official company name; Deseret Book is a already a section within the page, suggesting that it is not formally equivalent with the company. I'll request the move (can't do it directly as there is already a redirect at that page). Klbrain (talk) 11:14, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deseret Book Company is the actual name of the company 

message: Excel Entertainment Group isn't notable enough on its own. It is already included here. Take any info deemed worthy from its own article, merge it into this article, blank the Excel page and redirect it here. Mnnlaxer (talk) 04:36, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Support - Seems reasonable to me.--- ARTEST4ECHO(Talk) 13:13, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 11:10, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Excel Entertainment Group]] to this article 
Talk:Shinya Yamanaka

message: external link four not available. need modification.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.212.186.103 (talk) 11:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Assumed you meant the Balzan Prize, but other links at this time required repair, too.  Please, next time provide more exact details, since referring by only a relative number does not guarantee identification as article text and links are not static and may be reorganized at any time.  WurmWoodeT 06:29, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  external link four not available
Talk:Walter Heiligenberg

message: I am creating this page about Walter Heiligenberg because he contributed so much to the growing and increasingly important field of neuroethology.  His usage of model systems and advancement of computational and quantitative methods were groundbreaking, and still provide good examples for current research.  The application of his work to sensory systems that are different from, and much more complex than, Eigenmannia or the jamming avoidance response is telling of the significance of his work. 
Also, reading about his life and his work led me to believe that he was also very treasured and esteemed as a person.  I appreciated many of the personal comments about his life written by close friends and colleagues despite his early death.
Bibliakim 23:42, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment