lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WACL

message: Per request, I took a look at the article today.  The history section is strong, though it stops at 2003.  It feels like it needs at least one sentence to catch it up post-2003.  I also think the article needs a section on programming, and a little more meat in the lead section (some of the info from history etc).  I see it as a light C at present, but with potential.--Mojo Hand (talk) 17:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been having trouble finding information about the station post-2003, but am still looking. :)  Thanks for the review. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 23:35, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  This one I am going to hold off on, since I am having trouble find local sources, until I have full access to Newspapers.com, NewspaperArchive.com and HighBeam.  That way I can add more. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 22:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article review
Talk:NHibernate

message: can someone please put up the advanatages of this package. Nikhilhuilgol 10:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advantages

message: AFAIK (and according to the website) Sergey is working with Karl Chu on this project  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.199.128.156 (talk) 14:32, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Karl Chu 

message: The infobox shows http://www.nhibernate.org/ as the website, however, the External links section's "NHibernate Homepage" link shows http://www.nhforge.org/ as the URL of the website. I'm quite sure they should be http://www.nhibernate.org/, and if not, then at least they should be consistent. -206.174.64.60 (talk) 02:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As an addition to my last message, I wasn't suggesting to completely remove the http://www.nhforge.org/ link, but rather, rename it, and add the link shown in the infobox into the External links section. (if that's even needed; as I said, it's in the infobox) -206.174.64.60 (talk) 02:52, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  NHForge is the official site of the NHibernate project.  NHibernate.org is owned by the owners of Hibernate, who no longer maintain NHibernate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.170.68.209 (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of URLs 

message: I am missing mention of Fluent NHibernate in this article - "NHibernate is an Object Relational Mapping framework, which (as ORM states) maps between relational data and objects. It defines its mappings in an XML format called HBM, each class has a corresponding HBM XML file that maps it to a particular structure in the database. It's these mapping files that Fluent NHibernate provides a replacement for. ". "Fluent" in this context is not to be confused with fluent interface.
See http://wiki.fluentnhibernate.org/Getting_started
--Mortense (talk) 04:37, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fluent NHibernate 

message: The current section is copied from the referenced blog, which doesn't itself seem to cite any relevant references. Can anyone find anything actually from the NHibernate team about what's new in 3.2 which gives a bit more of a skilfully presented overview than the full JIRA release notes? 84.127.238.182 (talk) 12:36, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's new in NHibernate 3.2 

message: Hi, 
while surfing through I thought i might be a good idea to add Category:Object-relational_mapping onto this page. Hibernate itself is there http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Object-relational_mapping, but as Hibernate (Java) because of its approach. I ask because NHibernate is delivered as part of Hibernate, but also has its own article. So, complaints not to do? -- P.oppenia (talk) 11:46, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Category:Object-relational_mapping - any complaints?
Talk:WMQR

message: Thanks for uploading :Image:WJDV2007.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:00, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image source problem with Image:WJDV2007.jpg
Talk:Word Association

message: Is there a site for the ultra word association game?  Does it exist outside of WP? 63.226.191.37 22:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  site for ultra word association? 

message: Is it right to call him a psychologist, rather than, say, a mentalist?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.6.96.22 (talk) 00:26, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derren Brown 

message: Jung is credited with developing the word association test as a serious diagnostic tool, but the article does not adequately describe how he developed this test. --Smcg8374 (talk) 04:48, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carl Jung 

message: Does it still exist I remeber a few years ago there was a wikipedia version but I don't see it in the article so was it deleted  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.200.128.193 (talk) 12:42, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia version  

message: Association word with example 120.28.252.214 (talk) 09:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:WUFF-FM

message: Wikipedia's information must be verifiable through reliable 3rd party sources.  The source referenced is a self published document by a local historical society.  Since the document is not generally available, it is difficult to determine if the content of the article was a copyright violation (copied verbatim from the book) or original research - but both are problematic.   "It's true because I was there and lived through it" is not an adequate source for a Wikipedia article.StreamingRadioGuide 10:28, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of mentally ill monarchs

message: This unsourced list should be prodded. We don't need to perpetuate black legends in mainspace. In most cases, a monarch was declared "mad" by one of his successors purely for political gain. There is no reasonable criterion to assess madness of ancient monarchs, given the dearth of reliable contemporary sources. Was Cambyses as mad as he was represented by Darius? The question will always be open. --Ghirla-трёп- 10:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course the question will be open.  The purpose of this list is not to close it, merely to categorise the many instances where chroniclers have thought fit to declare a monarch mad. It doesn't make judgement.  Whereas by contrast there are countless Wikipedia articles on individuals that see fit to assess a monarch's reign.  I'm afraid I view your assertion that all "mad" monarchs were declared as such by their successors for political gain an overgeneralisation. Slac speak up! 21:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The title of the list clearly makes a judgement.  Almost all leaders are called crazy by someone.  Oddly, leaders like Nero and George III who were very rarely called crazy are on this list.  I strongly vote for deletion.  This is plain misinformationHoshidoshi 04:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: George III was forcibly  incarcerated for  several  months  of  his  reign due to insanity.  Check out this BBC news article.  Cardamon 09:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod

message: Should Commodus be added under Roman Emperors? The man thought he was Hercules reincarnate, for crying out loud.  But I wanted to get some feedback before I added him. 68.116.143.113 21:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commodus? 

message: The predecessor of Emperor Hirohito of Japan was OFFICIALLY declared mentally ill, and his duties were officially taken over by Crown Prince Hirohito as the official Prince Regent. Source: Any good biography of Hirohito, such as the one that I read years ago. Hence, Hirohito had a very long reign after his father's death, but even that was extended by his previous service as the Prince Regent. Hirohito was only the third Emperor since the Meiji Restoration, following Emperor Meiji, of course, then his father, and then himself. His son Emperor Akihito is only the fourth emperor since the Restoration. Note that he his an emperor without an empire, since the Japanese Empire was formally abolished in 1947.47.215.211.115 (talk) 05:03, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The predecessor of Emperor Hirohito
Talk:Franco-Crosti boiler

message: There is now a photo on Commons which may show the arrangement more clearly.
:Commons:File:Chesterfield BR 2-10-0 with Franco-Crosti boiler geograph-2751531-by-Ben-Brooksbank.jpg 217.42.199.221 (talk) 12:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Improved photo?
Talk:WVTF

message: I am attempting to add the WISE station info. Also the WISE translators. Since WISE is now 100% programmed by WVTF, this makes sense to me. --JeffConn (talk) 16:53, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On July 10, Radio IQ will become the primary service from WVTF. Most translators, WWVT, and WWVT-FM will inaugurate a new 24/7 music service "WVTF Music".
My proposed action is to merge and redirect existing Radio IQ to here since WVTF's existing network will take over the Radio IQ branding and schedule. Then expand WWVT-FM since it is the only full-powered FM station on WVTF Music. I will do this on the 10th.
https://radioinsight.com/headlines/118384/wvtf-shuffle-frequencies-music-radio-iq-outlets-across-virginia/
https://kelseap6.wixsite.com/flipwvtf
Full list of stations:
WVTF Music
88.1 W201CN Afton (Staunton)
89.5 W208BX Roanoke
89.5 W208AP Lynchburg
89.7 W209AA Charlottesville
89.9 WWVT-FM Ferrum
90.1 W211BF Big Stone Gap
90.1 W211BE Lebanon
90.3 W212BP Clintwood
95.5 W238BN Blacksburg
101.9 W270BJ Lexington
1260 WWVT Christiansburg
Radio IQ
88.3 WQIQ Spotsylvania Court House
88.5 WVTW Charlottesville
88.7 WRIQ Lexington
89.1 WVTF Roanoke
89.3 WVTU Charlottesville
90.5 WISE-FM Wise 
90.7 WEHC Emory (P-T)
90.9 W215BJ St. Paul
91.5 WLUR Lexington (P-T)
91.7 W219CJ Norton
91.9 WVTR Marion
92.5 W223AZ Richmond
93.9 W230BD Lovingston
94.9 W235BT Fredericksburg
Xenon54 (talk) 12:58, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Radio IQ/WVTF Music split
Talk:WWWV

message: Would it be possible for us to add back the history that Neutralhomer removed from this article back in 2013? I believe it has good enough significance of being added back and being updated to be history on its former self. If needed, I can provide sources for the stuff that was removed, if it is deemed necessary. This guy seems to have vandalized a majority of radio station's history pages for no reason. MINSA20 (talk) 21:28, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean this removal on September 10, 2013? If so, I have to entirely agree with the removal: not a single thing was sourced and it was mostly about the changes in on-air personalities. Sources are very much needed, and I'd be grateful if you could find us a source for the last paragraph of the present History section, on the format changes from 1977 to 2017, which I just tagged as unsourced after looking. Otherwise, the history we have now seems rather good to me; I don't think minutiae of who had what shows when would improve it. But if you meant a different removal, or if you disagree, yes, sources. The edit summary says as much:  (For what we mean by reliable sources, please see here.) More broadly:  is a very active and knowledgeable editor in the area of radio stations. He created many of the articles, including this one. Accusing him of vandalizing such articles just because he removes unreferenced material in accordance with policy—with edit summaries stating what is needed for the information to be re-added, even using the word "please"—is completely inappropriate. Thanks for raising the issue here, but please see this page on what vandalism is. Yngvadottir (talk) 09:27, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Sam Dunn

message: I heard his next project is going to focus on Rush. Any sources? WickedKnightAlbel (talk) 00:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rush doc 

message: Sam Dunn was in a few bands before he started making films. The bands I know of were: Fungkus (Album/Demo: Backflips and Balloon Animals) as well as Dementia (a metal project co founded with Jason Flower, they used to record stuff thru a mono walkman and ghetto blaster). I think Sam was in a few other bands, not sure.24.68.50.33 (talk) 21:08, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bands that Sam Dunn were in...
Talk:Lateral supracondylar ridge

message: I removed the link from "Lateral supracondylar line" from the Plantaris page previously referenced by the author of this article (see page history), and subsequently removed the author's reference to the incorrect link on the Plantaris page back to this one, rather than to the page for the lateral supracondylar line of the femur, which does not yet exist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luwolf (talk • contribs) 19:22, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lateral supracondylar line
Talk:Saving Grace (TV series)

message: I've removed the plot description because it's much too similar to THIS description (actually two descriptions, scroll down for the second one). It's not word for word, but it's too similar to be appropriate. Anchoress 04:12, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please correct number of seasons.  I’m watching the 4th season now. 2600:1700:546:E210:70E5:5825:3E56:1F0E (talk) 06:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: From linux1sking:
The plot description makes this show sound like a 7th Heaven episode.  There's no mention of the Angel, Grace's own need for redemption (or whatever), etc.  Someone out there is a better writer than I ...
Linux1sking 17:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot description

message: Maybe we should futher analyse the religious content of the show, cause as a european viewer i can't imagine this beeing broardcast on any european network due to its religious content  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.11.205.103 (talk) 16:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the subject of religion offensive to all Europeans? Or just to you? Highspeed  —Preceding comment was added at 17:08, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The show is among the most non-specific I've seen to have an angel. It's the only show like this I've seen where the atheist was treated respectfully and not pressured by the angel to convert. (Granted I found that a bit strange as you think atheism would be a bit less understandable if you are an angel sent by God) However I do think it's a bit odd that Baptists and Pentecostals don't seem to be that common on the show. Looking it up about a third of Oklahomans are Southern Baptist or Assemblies of God. My experience with Oklahomans has been mostly Baptists or people raised Baptist. I'm uncertain if this has been commented on by critics though. TV critics rarely venture to "fly over" land, but I imagine it'll be mentioned at some point.--T. Anthony (talk) 12:32, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The religion content is moderate compared to some American broadcasts. - kpwa_gok  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.149.184.32 (talk) 05:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Religion

message: This section is useless because it doesn't say what jobs these people hold. 209.247.21.77 (talk) 14:42, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call -- it has no place in the article anyway. It has been deleted. The info is available at IMDB and official site for anyone who wants that information anyway. Softlavender (talk) 20:37, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Main crew

message: Should something be included about Gretchen Wilson recording the song "work hard" for this show and then being sued by the Black Crowes for copyright infringment?--Brian Earl Haines (talk) 18:45, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gretchen Wilson song
Talk:Scaphoid bone

message: i broke my scaphoid and it SUCKS! it won't heal! --17:20, 20 July 2007 66.203.184.15
When I broke mine 23 years ago, my doc told me it's the slowest healing bone in the body. I was casted to above my elbow for 8 weeks and casted on the forearm for another 6 weeks. --24.6.228.145 (talk) 03:04, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does it have the word "sphenoid" in Greek letters (σφηνῳδής)? Is this the correct Classic Greek term for the scaphoid bone? Or a blunder when something like σκαφοειδές is meant? Pliny (talk) 11:14, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that there is a mistake. The right name for this bone in ancient Greek is σκαφοειδές. I'm correcting it. Pompilos (talk) 15:01, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: σφηνῳδής
Talk:Electronics manufacturing services

message: I think there should be a section in this article referring to the rationale behind the ems industry. to find out if it was the management consultants or economic rationalists who saw opportunities for companies who made losses on excess inventory and saw manufacturing as cost centres.
economic rationalists would see it as a core competency for ems companies who have the economies of scale and specialisation to add value. 
also need to mention that all the products manufactured by ems companies bear their customer's branding or corporate logos.
--Visik 11:25, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rationale for ems
Talk:Hamulus of hamate bone

message: In regard to the attachments of the transverse carpal ligament,
shouldn't navicular bone be scaphoid bone?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.25.65.157 (talk) 01:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  Its no longer referred to as the navicular in the hand.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sxoa (talk • contribs) 16:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:First metacarpal bone

message: ″Fractures to the first metacarpal bone account for 30–40% of all hand fractures and 25% of all metacarpal fractures (second to fractures to the fifth metacarpal bone).″
This claim does not make sense. Metacarpal fractures are a subset of hand fractures, right? Therefore the number of metacarpal fractures cannot exceed the number of hand fractures – right? Indeed, if carpal and phalangeal fractures exist at all, then the number of MC fractures must be smaller than the total of all hand fractures. So how can fractures of the first MC account for a third of all hand fractures – the larger set – but only for a quarter of MC fractures – the smaller set?--Mardil (talk) 08:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fracture stats
Talk:Waroch II

message: I am not entirely convinced that Howorths article is a reliable source. He admits at page 27 of his article (page 319 of the journal) The conclusions I have arrived at are at issue with those of the school of history now dominant, [...]. While I agree with some of his conclusions (especially the back-formation of personal names), it seems his article has not influenced the dominant school of history a lot in almost 130 years.
O, by the way, the FAQ at jstor.org seems to indicate that JSTOR has limited access. Erik Warmelink 11:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: JSTOR does have limited access. If you have any affiliation with a univeristy or college, you probably have access. If not, you probably need to subscribe. Srnec 04:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have access and the reference to the source is clear enough. Even if a subscription is required, an online source is more convenient than having to wait until the local library receives a copy of the journal. Erik Warmelink 14:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Anyways, Howorth is only cited for facts in this article. I did not use his paper for any evaluative statements. If I have the time, I will get another source for the statements he currently backs up, but those are hardly, to my knowledge, controversial. Srnec 04:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please, don't feel obliged to convince me,  I am just a —somewhat interested— amateur. If you consider the statements uncontroversial, that's more than enough for me. Erik Warmelink 14:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry H. Howorth
File talk:Hydrocephalic skull.jpg

message: This image is said to be a skull discoved by LLoyd Pye (which refutes that it is an example of hydrocephalus), while the hydrocephalus article claims that it is an example of the illness.--Esprit15d 20:01, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While this image is shown in the article on Lloyd Pye, I think it is meant to show how the Starchild skull is similar to skulls of people who have hydrocephalus (notice it was under the "Critisism" heading). There is no way this is an image of the Starchild skull if one compares it to the pictures found in the referenced pages for the Lloyd Pye article. I intend to edit the Lloyd Pye article to include a picture of the starchild skull, and possibly keep this image, but change the caption to make it clear that it's purpose there is to make a comparison. If there is no more discussion here in a week I will remove the conflict tag. --TinyTimZamboni (talk) 17:34, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict
Talk:Kathgodam

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:42, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Mario Montoya Uribe

message: Please be careful when editing the references, they are in a format that links back to the original, removing the original mention will destory the rest of them. Thank you. --SixOfDiamonds 12:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm currently making a few edits (will describe them later), trying to respect the above. Juancarlos2004 01:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, I think. Montoya is his last name, not his middle name. The edits mostly concerned the removal or trimming of information already repeated in the Triple A article, as well as additions and changes intended to put it in a less partisan context, by including additional information from the LA Times article. Juancarlos2004 02:21, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates
Talk:Parti Rakyat Malaysia

message: Hassan Karim has joined Keadilan!   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.52.106.26 (talk) 19:42, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Hassan Karim quited PRM

message: @Vif12vf on the contrary, the party's deputy president explicitly states that the party "...rejects socialism...". Taking this into consideration, I would argue that "democratic socialism" should not be listed as one of the party's ideologies, at least currently. There is also the Malaysiakini article where a former party president and current central committee member asserts the party has been ideologically diluted due to the influx of members from non-socialist, nominally liberal, parties. Sisuvia (talk) 04:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Socialism