Talk:North Carolina Highway 147

message: What was going to interchange with NC 147 between Ellis Road and Briggs Avenue? --NE2 23:33, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's the NCDOT's plan for that connector: . --TinMan 06:02, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interchange 

message: The Exits section needs major cleanup - it's pretty unreadable now.  Why not a list, table, etc.?  Jpp42 11:37, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I created a table.  Feel free to modify it, clean it up, or otherwise change it.  See Help:Table if you need syntax assistance.  Nimur 22:24, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exits section 

message: I, David McDowell, found of No Tolls on 540 have re-added this section. The public has a right to read and know all things relevant to this road including information for or against the proposed tolls. Turnpike420 13:05, 14 Aug 2008
: Wikipedia is not a soap box.  This section is filled with POV.  Although you should probably not be writing this section at all due to conflict of interest, you should at least rewrite it so that it is NPOV.67.81.96.169 (talk) 08:52, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on North Carolina Highway 147. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121229090753/https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/safety/Teppl/TEPPL%20All%20Documents%20Library/Sorted%20by%20County.pdf to https://connect.ncdot.gov/resources/safety/Teppl/TEPPL%20All%20Documents%20Library/Sorted%20by%20County.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:36, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on North Carolina Highway 147. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120109062743/http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/12/08/1697098/states-first-modern-toll-road.html to http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/12/08/1697098/states-first-modern-toll-road.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140414225141/https://www.myncquickpass.com/en/faq/all.shtml to https://www.myncquickpass.com/en/faq/all.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120327104609/http://blogs.newsobserver.com/crosstown/rtp-commuters-the-nc-147-southern-spur-is-closed-today-for-good to http://blogs.newsobserver.com/crosstown/rtp-commuters-the-nc-147-southern-spur-is-closed-today-for-good
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140910200606/http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/09/08/4134356_road-worrier-durhams-east-end.html to http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/09/08/4134356_road-worrier-durhams-east-end.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061021031311/http://members.cox.net/ncroads/nc145149.html to http://www.members.cox.net/ncroads/nc145149.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:45, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I-885 shouldn't have only a subsection of NC 147, considering that it also runs along US 70 and that the East End Connector isn't solely related to 147. To have enough material for a split, I put together a draft for an I-885 article. It's ready to simply be copied over to replace the Interstate 885 redirect, so it won't take a group effort, but I would like some second opinions on my draft before anything is done. Roadsguy (talk) 05:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: At this point, though no one has commented yet, no one has objected either, I'm going to just go ahead and do it within the next few days unless anyone wants to get in a last-minute objection. Roadsguy (talk) 23:06, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're fine.  Certainly someone would have said something in objection if we had any issues. –Fredddie™ 23:40, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

text: Let us hold off at this time till an official submission and approval by AASHTO or FHWA. The reasoning is because things can change and what NCDOT may want, may not get. This happened with Interstates 42 and 87, when NCDOT had picked a different designations and was given those instead. In the meantime, we can continue to park proposed I-885 here. --WashuOtaku (talk) 02:43, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

text: I'm with Washuotaku here on holding off; if someone wants to create something in draft space in preparation for when this becomes a real thing, I'd be fine with that, but as of now I-885 isn't even a paper interstate and exists only ephemerally, it's a loosely proposed number that hasn't been submitted for consideration even.  AASHTO may approve a different number, a different routing, or may reject the entire thing out-of-hand.  I remember all of the wrangling that went on a few years back over the I-495/I-44/I-50/I-87 proposals and changes that kept going around and around.  Lets get this to a stable thing first; mock up something in draft so it is ready to go when it's in some kind of final form is fine, but as of yet, we're not there.  --Jayron32 15:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Good thing I waited a few more days. My draft is already essentially finished, but for now I agree that we should wait for AASHTO approval or some other official word. I-495 in particular, though, was official, though the various designations proposed since 495 and before 87 certainly didn't deserve a separate article yet. Roadsguy (talk) 23:17, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split I-885 article; review of draft 

message: I stumbled across multiple signs that the project is in the final stages. First, on the official site of the NCDOT, in their DriveNC.gov site, it now shows I-885 (Sorry I can't link it directly but the signs pop up right after the Interchange with I-40). Second, I found an image originally from the News & Observer which shows that NC 147 will be decommissioned on the current concurrency with I-885. Not to mention they have taken the drapes off of the signs which mention I-885. What is everyone's opinion about this? Thanks! DiscoA340 (talk) 16:20, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Support Looks like we have a good draft going. I also somewhat agree with Imzadi on the RfC comment. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 20:20, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

text: Someone will need to takeover the draft of I-885 and finish it up so it can be added. --WashuOtaku (talk) 15:04, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I can, but I'll need a few hours to complete it. I'll put it at Draft:Interstate 885. Ncchild (talk) 20:13, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

text: I've filed a request on Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests. OrdinaryJosh (talk) 10:00, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it time to split I-885 

message: For some reason, many of the world’s worldwide languages (i.e. French, Spanish, and all of the varieties of Chinese) are missing a version of this wiki. I think versions of this article for those aforementioned languages should be created. TheCool1Z (talk) 23:31, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation