lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Uninsured motorist clause

message: Dictionary def 
brief Q&A
These are a couple of sources I used to start this article, in case people need them. Please, extend this if you know anything about it. I'm working blind here, as I don't even live in the US. Skittle 21:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The states mentioned required insured motorist (%98 of drivers) to pay extra for uninsured motorist coverage.  Also the states ask $500 or run "state run auto insurance" - and don't give licenses otherwise.  If what the article says is true these states are forcing far more than double coverage - which can't be true.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.209.223.190 (talk) 23:25, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: needs corrections
Talk:Chappal

message: Removed this:
It has been suggested in some quarters, however, that because of it ubiquity, the chappal is better seen as a strategic deterrent rather than as an actual weapon. This school of thought holds that if a chappal were ever to be deployed, it would inevitably result in retaliation, escalation, and finally mutually assured destruction. The chappal therefore has questionable value as a literal instrument of combat. Opponents of this theory contend that incidents of actual chappal-based violence do indeed occur with some regularity. They point out that a simple Google search on the words chappal and hurling will confirm this.
71.199.123.24 21:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wolf Trap National Park for the Performing Arts

message: To address 68.100.225.11's comment in the correction history and to clear up any confusion: the park office has a Vienna mailing address but it is not in the town of Vienna, nor is the actual park. See the below census map of the Town of Vienna for reference:
http://factfinder.census.gov/leg1/19/168251219.gif
Both are in the Wolf Trap CDP. The article needs to either state that (or just "in Fairfax County, Virginia"). DrRockzo (talk) 00:50, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location of the park 

message: Here are two infoboxes that were embedded in the Filene's Center infobox, but which were producing the label "Building details" atop the article. I'm placing it here pending debugging.
	
 PRRfan (talk) 14:55, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox that is generating stray "Building details" text
Talk:Plaza Tower

message: I've always been partial to the Plaza Tower, partly because of what I heard about its origin and the reason it's been sitting out there by itself all these years.  It was developed (according to this tale) by ol' Louie Roussel, who put it there because of that optimal, unbeatable location right across from... the train station!  This was, what, about ten minutes before Americans stopped taking trains and started flying instead?  Anyway, I haven't found any source for such a story, but it would make a good addition to the article if someone could find a source.  Great article, by the way. -- Muffuletta 21:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin myth

message: I'm moving the article back to "Plaza Tower", the original name and still what almost everyone calls it, from "Crescent City Towers", the name of the failed redevelopment plan. Infrogmation (talk) 15:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Crescent City Towers that never were
Talk:The Deceiver (novel)

message: This article lacks hyperlinks even to the most obvious page: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Forsyth>.
There should also be some mention that this novel led to several TV movies co-written with Murray Smith: <http://imdb.com/title/tt0097633/>, <http://imdb.com/title/tt0099231/>, <http://imdb.com/title/tt0099383/>, <http://imdb.com/title/tt0100034/>, <http://imdb.com/title/tt0100406/> and <http://imdb.com/title/tt0100407/>.
Jkaki00
Il try to sort as much of this as I can. 84.12.54.53 15:16, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Burning Bridges (Arch Enemy album)

message: Is July 27 the US release date? --CircafuciX (talk) 23:11, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US release date 
Talk:0845 number

message: Ofcom plans to make "084" the lower rate number . When the details are finalised, this should be reflected in the article.
User Abut 13:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 084

message: See the talk page for saynoto0870.com for the discussion on the inclusion of this link. -- [Jam][talk] 12:38, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: saynoto0870.com

message: The new 03 number ranges will begin to be available starting from November 2007. These have been given a pricing structure that is required to match the geographic 01 and 02 ranges (including being included in any bundled minutes packages). 0845 and other existing 08 numbers will continue to operate, but the expectation in the industry is that 03 numbers will quickly replace 0845 in the minds of businesses and consumers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Spudley (talk • contribs) 16:58, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 03

message: To call an 0845 number from the mobile network "Three" or "3" it is 15p a minute. Adamfawcett 20:21, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your message. The page already says it costs 15p from a 3 mobile. ~~ [Jam][talk] 21:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three mobile network 

message: It strikes me that the tone of the opening paragraph of this article is somewhat weighted. Not sure if this is because someone intended to quote or reference some sources, or just has an axe to grind. Tafkam (talk) 22:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think someone recently added the new paragraph and I haven't had chance to read it through and alter / remove parts of it that seemed a non-neutral POV. Feel free to remove/re-word it to be more neutral if you want. ~~ [Jam][talk] 23:26, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: I suggest a merge with the 0870 number and Non-geographical telephone numbers in the UK articles - There is a lot of duplication, and the Non-geographical telephone numbers in the UK appears to be the better base to start from. Birkett (talk) 09:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. All the articles for different numbers (0870, 0845, 0844, etc.) should be merged into one article, maybe even as part of Telephone numbers in the United Kingdom. Redirects can be made from individual numbers, but I don't see a need for a separate article for each number. JRawle (Talk) 10:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have merged this article into Non-geographical telephone numbers in the UK as per the consensus here. fr33kman -s- 23:53, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with 0870 number
Talk:List of school districts in Iowa

message: As so many Iowa school districts cross county lines, it may be better to organize alphabetically?
WhisperToMe (talk) 04:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be by county, based on where the district offices are located. That is how they are organized on the reference from the state. RickH86 (talk) 16:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:    It appears 38 state lists are organized alphabetically, so I'm going to revise this.  RickH86 (talk) 14:34, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be organized on a table alphabetically Norwegain (talk) 02:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization 

message: It would be nice to get an article created for every district on this list.  RickH86 (talk) 14:40, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe an article has now been created for every district, as of 2020. RickH86 (talk) 15:13, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Creation for districts that don't have pages 

message: I don't see former districts on other lists of school districts, but it would help to prevent them from being orphaned.  Any suggestions?  RickH86 (talk) 21:11, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I definitely agree with listing them here. The State of Iowa lists those since 1965, and Arkansas has a post-1983 list (Texas does too), while Mississippi lists those since 2014. There's another list of former Arkansas districts from 1965 to 1998. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former school districts 

message: Aleksandra Vujicic of the Associated Press stated that there were over 900 school districts in Iowa in 1938, but the Iowa Department of Education put the figures at 4,839 in 1922 and 4,558 in 1953. I'm guessing the state has the correct figures.
WhisperToMe (talk) 20:31, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figures of former districts 

message: Is there some reason we've changed this to be by county?  I think it's harder to find a specific district, and as noted above, the lists for 38 states are just alphabetical, so unless they are also in the process of being changed, this list no longer conforms to the majority. RickH86 (talk) 18:49, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I will be attempting to make this a table, tell me if I'm doing something wrong please Norwegain (talk) 02:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization - reorganized
Talk:2005–06 UEFA Cup

message: This section needs to represent both sides equally (the current version seems to have been written by a Boro fan), and give detailed information of events in the game, instead of just a critique of Boro's tactics. Don't have time to research it myself and I'm sure there are enough Boro and Seville fans out there who know what happened! --iamajpeg 21:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeh unfortunately, most sevilla fans will probably be posting on the spanish wiki. Philc TECI 08:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final 

message: Stop changing it from "an easy win" to "beat". How can you not consider 4-0 an easy win? Besides, Seville dominated this match.
:Not all 4-0 wins are easy. Have you watche the game? Conscious 05:41, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's still a point of view - I've seen easier wins, too.  Reverted.  Stephenb (Talk) 08:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Please provide evidence that the win was easy if you want it included in the article. Conscious 08:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

text: *Boro was within one goal for 77 minutes. Just because they gave up 3 late doesn't mean it was "easy".  That's POV. - Pal 14:40, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stop Changing my addition at the very top of this article! 

message: Why have all match dates been removed?
--Kostja 14:55, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Match Dates 

message: :File:Eindhoven2006.jpg is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at :File:Eindhoven2006.jpg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 15:15, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-free file problems with [[:File:Eindhoven2006.jpg]]
Talk:Tara Donovan

message: added reference, but didnt know how to do it well. if you know pls do it--Greece666 22:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Bearian 18:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 

message: Her work was featured in the Whitney Biennial in 2000 and the All Soviet Exhibition. I am somewhat confused by this statement. Did Ms. Donovan show her work in a gallery or museum that was hosting an 'All Soviet Exhibition' ? Was this some ironically named exhibit in the post 1991 world?  --Francis Burdett (talk) 19:50, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: All Soviet Exhibition
Talk:History of the Northern Dynasties

message: What is the reason for removing the dynasties that are covered by the work?  (And no, "apparently cos the dates was already given on the article, or maybe you're blind, which I can't blame on you" is not a good enough reason -- since the readers of the articles can't immediately convert dates to dynasties without first knowing what the dynasties were in the first place.)  --Nlu (talk) 22:10, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

message: RfC has been filed.  The current main arguments are as above.  These arguments, presumably, pertain to both this article and History of Southern Dynasties.  --Nlu (talk) 04:46, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 
Talk:SITO (artist collective)

message: i have added a few links to sources on the internet and removed "verify" tag.  hope this is okay.  let me know what other things need to be verified and i can see if i can dig up some sources.  thanks!  Jon Lon Sito (talk) 22:25, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: request for citations 

message: just wanted a place to put some links to old stuff found
Jon Lon Sito 22:11, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some notes/references on ancient SITO history 
Talk:Panzer Army Africa

message: This version of the page ( Revision as of 14:47, 14 February 2006) said:
:Panzer Group Africa (German Panzergruppe Afrika) was established in September 1941 to control the German mechanized forces in North Africa during World War II.
But the current text which comes from the Afrika Korps page says:
:On August 15 1941 Panzer Group Africa was activated with Rommel in command, and command of the Afrika Korps was turned over to Ludwig Crüwell. 
Can someone please check which is correct and if necessary amend both pages to reflect the correct date. --Philip Baird Shearer 22:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: August or September
Talk:Blut Aus Nord

message: In common German you would say "aus Norden" to point out the direction. Sailors say "aus Nord". 80.187.105.2 (talk) 14:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "aus Nord" vs. "aus Norden" 

message: Mondeville where? --Harald Khan  Ճ 20:31, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mondeville 
Category talk:Religious scandals

message: I think we need to clarify the criteria for inclusion in this category, to avoid any confusion and POV issues. I'd suggest keeping it to sex scandals and proven criminal activity. I don't think it's appropriate for people who are controversial merely on account of their style of ministry and/or their theology. Jammycakes 22:18, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I was wondering if the pattern of kidnappings of young Irish women carried out by the Roman Catholic Church for much of the 20th Century would fit in this category.  Will look for an article on that subject.  Boris B 17:46, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kidnapping 

message: List of church scandals is essentially the same thing.  All listed under "Christian evangelical scandals" are already listed here.  These are triplicate articles. Zz414 00:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Christian evangelical" and "religious" are not completely equal. A Christian evangical is religious, but a religious person isn't a Christian evangical. Anyway, lists and categories are different. FGT2 21:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Kieth O'dor

message: I'm pretty sure that his name is spelt as Kieth Odor - I followed his career in the early nineties in Autosport magazine and that's how I remember it - notably because it wasn't spelt "Keith".  Unfortunately the Autosports are now all long pulped so I can't confirm it.
Anyone else able to say for sure?
Cm6051 22:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's absolutely, certainly "Kieth" rather than "Keith". Also, while it may be technically correct that his family name was written Ódor, neither he nor his father were *ever* referred to as such in the press - it was always spelled Odor or O'Dor. Even in his final season in Germany, he had O'Dor on his car window. His dad never called himself Janós either - it was always Jan Odor (no accents), and his racing team was called Janspeed. Isn't Wikipedia supposed to use the most common spelling rather than one which is (possibly) technically correct? 81.104.160.179 10:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

text: This move request has been accepted and completed. - Ganeshk (talk) 05:26, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:AARP The Magazine

message: KeithTyler added a merge tag here without explanation, so I'm simply starting talk page discussion in order that others might weigh in.  The magazine, to be sure, is notable irrespective of its AARP association, if only in view of its massive circulation, but it is also, unlike other geriatric magazines, inextricably linked to AARP, getting its readership only by virtue of its AARP association.  I haven't yet developed an opinion apropos of a prospective merge, I suppose.  WP:MM suggests that we merge where the instant page is very short and cannot or should not be expanded terribly much, and I can't imagine that this article could be greatly expanded; OTOH, Consumers Union and Consumer Reports, between which the relationship is similar to that betwixt the two articles of which we write, have separate articles, even as they cover related subjects...[and] have a large overlap (viz., in that CR is published by CU, such that the former is largely incorporated by reference into the latter) (see also ESPN The Magazine and ESPN).  At the very least, I think we can safely say that, if this article can't be expanded much, we should merge; if it can be expanded, well, we should expand it.  Thoughts? Joe 22:35, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That was my general point, and it seemed fairly obvious. By sharing a name with the organization, it seems pretty clear that AARP The Magazine is intended for members of the AARP and to boost visibility of the AARP organization. I don't think you can say the same about CU and CR. CR is not named Consumers Union Monthly. Also, CU is not merely an organization for the sake of its own membership, but an institution that performs a function (product testing). Meanwhile ESPN and ESPN The Magazine are merely parallel media outlets from the same parent source, so it is an even more different animal (ESPN The Magazine is a magazine, ESPN itself is a television channel). - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 23:35, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think you fairly distinguish the CU and ESPN cases from that at hand, and I concur, as I think I did above, in what you've said.  I'll merge and redirect if there shouldn't be any substantive objections here or at Talk:American Association of Retired Persons in the next few days.  Joe 03:34, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Colin Ward

message: This is a bit of an odd phrase, anarcho-syndicalism is neither the first nor the only anarchist tradition to advocate "removing authority yet keeping a social organisation."  Further, I'm pretty sure that Ward was never an anarcho-syndicalist. Madashell 22:37, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "In a method similar to anarcho-syndicalism"

message: Please cite the source of Ward's quotations.  ~FreddieResearch
hmm yes this whole article is looking a bit unreferenced... and sorry i cant help, i dont know where these quotations are from. Mujinga (talk) 14:13, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lacking Citations

message: Colin's influential book with Dennis Hardy, Arcadia for All, appears to be missing. - Djknight82 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.157.234.42 (talk) 17:22, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arcadia for All missing

message: Section 2.1 Anarchism states that the anarchist "form of federalism was put forward in part by Kropotkin and Proudhon". To my knowledge, Kropotkin never wrote about federalism; Proudhon wrote a whole book on the subject, "The principle of federation
and the need to reconstitute the party of revolution", and Bakunin wrote about it too in his "Revolutionary Catechism", so by the time Kropotkin began to write, anarchist federalism was already well defined.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.102.101.238 (talk) 11:22, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Kropotkin and Federalism
Talk:Gales Ferry, Connecticut

message: The article currently states that "Gales Ferry includes several farmsteads that are individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places, including the Nathan Lester House on Vinegar Hill Road, the Perkins-Bill House at 1040 Long Cove Road, and the Capt. Mark Stoddard Farmstead at 24 Vinegar Hill Road."  Are those places in fact in Gales Ferry, or is Gales Ferry just the nearest village to these farmsteads?  The source, the National Register's NRIS database, is not clear (the town/village location field is often just a "nearest to" descriptor). --doncram (talk) 15:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: These places do have Gales Ferry mailing addresses but are well east of the original village. The Gales Ferry ZIP code includes much more than the original village. --Polaron | Talk 18:51, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Per that comment from April, i just now revised the article to assert those places are nearby but not in the village/hamlet.  This is progress i guess. --doncram (talk) 20:48, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: location checking needed
Talk:Charlie Jade

message: There have actually been 3 DVD set released. One in Japan, One in the UK, and One in AU. The AU set is suppose to be the best with more extras, 5.1 Sound, and a better transfer (fewer artifacts) than the others especially the Japan set, which has a lot of artifacts in the transfers.
Australia Set (5.1 Sound, Recap Episode & more extras)
http://www.amazon.com/Charlie-Jade-Entire-NON-USA-Australia/dp/B001H03IZG
UK Boxed Set (Stereo Sound, No Recap Episode)
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Charlie-Jade-Complete-Exclusive-Amazon-co-uk/dp/B0012GTPPM/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1283661292&sr=8-1
Japan Boxed Set (Stereo Sound, No Recap Episode, Poor Transfer/Artifacts)
http://www.play-asia.com/paOS-13-71-ad-49-en-70-1txj.html
99.58.88.112 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  DVD Sets 

message: I'm cutting some of the phrases that seem like the author was reviewing the show rather than writing about it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.137.175.136 (talk) 05:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: Fox Japan started playing a short (2~3 second) coming-soon teaser for the show in early October, now replaced by longer ones giving more info. The premier will be on November 30 (making the "Starting in November!" copy true in only a technical sense!). I'll add Japan to the list of countries where it's being shown (even if a year late?) after that date. Looks interesting. (SandChigger 07:34, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coming to Japan 

message: The official site spells it as "Vexcor" so what's the rationale for spelling it "Vex-Cor" ?
Though I see the series it self changes between with or with out the hyphen - perhaps intentional or perhaps a mistake, though I guess this site should vary as well then :)
IceHunter 13:29, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vexcor
Talk:Somerset, Queensland

message: Needs more historical information. Why was it settled? Why was it abandoned? QazPlm 22:56, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Should the page Somerset, Queensland be in the "Populated places in Far North Queensland" category? The place seems to be abandoned and indeed was found to have no population in the 2011 census. --TheFancyHuman (talk) 11:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this page be in the "Populated places in Far North Queensland" category?
Talk:Little Cloud

message: Who is doing the backing vox? --128.250.37.103 07:59, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fancy Lover 
Template talk:Southeastern Conference football venue navbox

message: Should not this template and :Template:SEC Basketball Venues be merged into one.  There is not need to seperate templates? --Ttownfeen 23:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, one is for football stadiums and one is for basketball stadiums, so yeah, they should be separate. (Cardsplayer4life 16:15, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Queen of Spades (1916 film)

message: Am I correct in assuming that this article was written by someone whose grasp of the English language is less than perfect? To put it bluntly, this article uses English words but one can hardly say it's written IN English. Needs to be worked on by a native speaker or someone with equal skills. As the article stands now it is, I'm very much afraid, just gibberish. 87.95.131.64 (talk) 12:37, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: In desperate need of a re-write