Talk:St Bartholomew-the-Great

message: Just deleted unnecessary proposal on this page (My own).
I have reverted the change of photos. The proposed replacement is no better: it still has the problems with exposure that plague all of these, so the top windows are too bright. Indeed it is a worse photo in that it has a load of foreground clutter and manages to lose the view of the founder's tomb. I am surprised that anyone thought it was worth the trouble of replacing it. A MUCH better photo is needed, not this fiddling. 138.37.188.109 08:33, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I did try for a long time (as I'm sure the previous photographer did) to resolve this problem. The trouble is that the interior of the church is dark, and the only significant light source is the windows. Without using a powerful flash or interior lighting, the only practical choice is between having dark windows and a very dark interior or a visible interior and over-exposed windows. I think we'll just have to live with it. 
BTW, I'll re-revert the images - the original had a number of other problems (an overly narrow angle and an odd green tint) which prompted me to take that replacement. -- ChrisO 13:36, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: which is full of clutter in the foreground, and in which you cannot see Rahere's tomb. It's so nice that you are so full of confidence in your own virtues. 138.37.188.109 07:51, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: St Bartholomew-the-Great or St Bartholomew the Great? The article doesn't seem sure. Are you? :) Best wishes DBaK (talk) 12:35, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyphen

message: This is a only former Roman Catholic church in that it was a church before the English Reformation. It should not be included in :Category:Former Roman Catholic churches in England because it is still a church. The parent category :Category:Former Roman Catholic church buildings specifies Church buildings which were built by the Roman Catholic Church, but are either (1) no longer standing, (2) no longer in use as church buildings, (3) now used by another religion or denomination. I will remove this category and also :Category:12th-century Roman Catholic church buildings. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have re-read the guidelines quoted above, and realise that I was mistaken. As this church is now used by a denomination other than Roman Catholic it qualifies under clause 3. However, so would thousands of pre-reformation churches in former Roman Catholic countries. Adding all these to the Former Roman Catholic churches categories would make these categories unusable, and these categories are unhelpful here. I will raise this on the category talk page. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:57, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Roman Catholic church categories 

message: The name of the church doesn't have hyphens in the name, according to the website for the church, yet it won't let me to move the article's name to the correct name of this church. Why is that?Legend of Remy (talk) 08:36, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name  

message: It appears that the parish of St Bartholomew-the-Great has been combined with two neighbouring parishes and renamed as Great St Bartholomew. However, there is surprisingly little detail on this on their website and I have not found a citable source.
The church website says:
The year appears to be wrong (1 June 2014 was a Sunday). This page says:
This proposal from the Diocese of London dated 30 March 2015 has
Can someone please confirm this and provide a citable source? Verbcatcher (talk) 15:21, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The references to "2014" on the website appear to be typos. If you scroll further down further you will see that directly after "8th to 13th June 2014" is "Sunday, 14th June 2015". Afterwriting (talk) 15:32, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Parish of Great St Bartholomew  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on St Bartholomew-the-Great. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070611214737/http://www.british-history.ac.uk/catalogue.asp?gid=97 to http://www.british-history.ac.uk/catalogue.asp?gid=97
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified