Talk:Subbotniks

message: In what sense are the Subbotniks rationalistic? They are religious believers who accept the Old Testament and various aspects of Jewish law and ritual. Rationalism is normally associated with religious sceptism or at least a rarified, deistic view of religion. Perhaps the associations of the word are different in Russian. 
In any case, someone should either provide context for this usage or delete it. The hyperlink to the Rationalism article should certainly go, since its definitions of rationalism have no connection with anything that could characterise the Subbotniks.66.183.165.57 15:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Russian rationalistic bodies" 

message: :Image:Subbotniks.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 19:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Subbotniks.jpg

message: The article does not mention whether the Subbotniks were originally Christians who adopted Jewish ritual and belief, or Jews who combined Christian elements in their practice.  If that is a disputed matter among historians, then that should be exposed.  There is no mention as of when or where they originated, how big a group they are, and what ever happen to them in present time.  Are there any famous Subbotniks?  Have they converted to either Judaism or Christianity?
I remember hearing that the old synagogue in Birobidzhan, a log cabin, was actually a Subbotnik church.  Any information on that?
Rafael Eitan's biography in Wikipedia mentions that he was born from Subbotnik parents.  Does that mean he wasn't really Jewish?
It would be great if someone competent enough to answer these questions came to Wikipedia and presented his reply.--rafvrab (talk) 02:46, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Subbotniki do not claim to be Jews.  They simply believe that Judaism is true and have adopted certain Jewish practices accordingly.Mikedelsol (talk) 14:51, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Origins, Evidence of Their Relationship to Jews Beyond Ideology 

message: There is currently discussion regarding the creation of a work group specifically to deal with articles dealing with this subject, among others,  here. Any parties interested in working in such a group are welcome to indicate their interest there. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 17:39, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed work group 

message: I'm curious:  was he a RO archbishop who converted, or did the Subbotniks have archbishops?  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 18:14, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The former archbishop Romantzov 

message: Any comments on the new lead please? Is it acceptable? YuHuw (talk) 09:50, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Lead 

message: The last paragraph of §  State of Israel includes a sentence beginning
:The ruling was under abolished in 2014, 
This is nonsensical and should be corrected, but I can't figure out what was meant. 
--Thnidu (talk) 01:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gibberish sentence