lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Strahd von Zarovich

message: - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 20:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great ref 

message: There are a couple of places in the development history section that compare the two Ravenloft adventures & Strahd to specific parts of Bram Stoker's Dracula and to Barnabas Collins. Without clear sources, I think this drifts into  original research. Thoughts? Sariel Xilo (talk) 18:32, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately that appears to have been common in content left over from the earlier days of Wikipedia; people just ignored (or were unaware of) the OR rules and wrote whatever sounded good to them. If it is unsourced and you can't find anything to verify it, I think it can be safely removed. 8.37.179.254 (talk) 19:27, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research?
Talk:Hope Valley line

message: How many tonnes in a ton? 1.016  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:4712:5101:FD57:682:BA69:B3CB (talk) 12:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

message: The large majority of news references to this line, seem to have it in the uppercase 'Line' "Hope+Valley+Line"&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjZhNeF65LqAhVFtnEKHU81BVg4FBD8BSgDegQIDBAF&biw=1366&bih=627 I would argue that this article has been downcased wrongly (and without any discussion). G-13114 (talk) 11:50, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: As there are quite a few articles about railway upgrades including Transpennine Route Upgrade, I was thinking of writing a separate article on the Hope Valley line upgrade.  Do people think this is a good idea? GRALISTAIR (talk) 14:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: For a passing loop and a new platform? I'm not sure this is of the scale or promotion with distinct identity as the TRU. I suspect there will be a fair few local and industry sources saying what's going on and what it costs etc but is that really passing GNG? Rcsprinter123 (articulate) 00:22, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I had started one but I have now put in an archived sandbox. I will resurrect it easily if/when there are more upgrades to the line and it warrants its own article. GRALISTAIR (talk) 20:59, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hope Valley upgrade
Talk:International Christian College

message: Is there a reason that we have a redirect from ICC to the BTI page? Considering the fact that BTI hasn't exactly existed since 1991, it would seem to make more sense having BTI, GBC and NBC pages directed to an ICC-titled page.  -M —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.177.59 (talk • contribs) 
:I agree, will perform the move tomorrow unless anyone objects in the intervening period. GiollaUidir 21:20, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, it would appear that it needs to be an admin to do the move as there is a redirect page by the name ICC already. GiollaUidir 18:25, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  This page has been moved from "Bible Training Institute" to "International Christian College" as the result of a move request listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves. Dekimasuよ! 07:33, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested Move

message: Regarding the banner that has been put across the top of the page, I wrote most of this article, and so far as I recall, the sources are mostly in the external links section at the bottom. --PeterR (talk) 22:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of Sources
Talk:Jumbee

message: Wikified as part of the Wikification wikiproject! JubalHarshaw 19:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikified

message: We need more help with this... Jumbee tales are few and far 
George the Hippy 02:32, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Help needed
Talk:United States involvement in the Mexican Revolution

message: This page is obviously not neutral.  This and the companion articles need to be fixed.
I second this observation, and have added a neutrality tag.  Jrt989 (talk) 00:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "When U.S. agents discovered that the German merchant ship Ypiranga was illegally carrying arms to the dictator Huerta, President Wilson ordered troops to the port of Veracruz to stop the ship from docking."
:What made it illegal? 143.239.203.119 (talk) 15:52, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  In the United States occupation of Veracruz: "The arms shipment to Mexico, in fact, originated from the Remington Arms company in the U.S. The arms and ammunition were to be shipped via Hamburg, Germany."Add to that H. L. Wilson's supposed involvement, it may seem a rather possible rupture with legitimacy. --Askedonty (talk) 20:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Please see, e.g., here. Bearian (talk) 15:50, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article in the news 

message: In the first paragraph, it's hard to understand what happened during the Mexican Revolution, and what happened long before that time.  (I'm not knowledgeable, so will not attempt myself to improve this.) Acwilson9 (talk) 05:05, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  First paragraph is temporally confusing 

message: More on what the mexican government did when the u.s intervened 75.169.187.174 (talk) 22:32, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S and Mexico
Talk:Tripura University

message: --59.160.104.20 19:49, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 11:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.tripurauniv.in/index.php/about-us http://www.tripurauniv.in/index.php/general-information. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 12:52, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: See also Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Swarupskd.wiki. MER-C 12:52, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Might be useful to anyone seeking to extend:
http://www.uniindia.com/prof-v-l-dharurkar-appointed-as-vice-chancellor-of-tripura-central-university/states/news/1280104.html
https://m.dailyhunt.in/news/india/english/tripura+india+english-epaper-tripurae/dr+vijaykumar+laxmikantrao+dharurkar+appointed+as+new+vice+chancellor+of+tripura+university-newsid-91646670
--Muhandes (talk) 09:44, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links removed
Talk:Loose Tubes

message: I have removed the "Criticism and racial politics" subsection which I added in an earlier edit - the reason being that, although I feel that the content was still potentially interesting, it was over-emphasized in the article due to the size of the subsection and the subjectivity of the cited commentator. I have retained the original cited reference within the article, but relocated it to a new passage elsewhere in the article which mentions Adrian Reid's criticism of the band less explicitly. - Dann Chinn (talk) 20:24, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: On second thoughts I have now removed the reference altogether due to belief that the subjectivity of the cited commentator verged on the libellous and that, on reflection, I should not have added it in the first place. If any of the content is restored at a future date, it should be with consideration of this. - Dann Chinn (talk) 23:41, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

text: I have reinserted the reference as I believe that it is valid in so far as it shows criticism of the band. However, I don't think it would qualify under WP:RS for anything less-subjective. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:39, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: De-emphasising "racial politics" subsection
Talk:History of Portugal (1834–1910)

message: Any chance this article will be ever completed? --62.77.100.41 19:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I am not fluent enough in English to ammend it myself, but it makes no sense to understand 76 years of constitutional monarchy as a prelude to the republican revolution. 
--95.122.161.222 (talk) 17:15, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: bad beginning
Talk:Victoria Park, Barnet

message: The title Victoria Park, Finchley, would probably be sufficient. Imc 19:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The east London park is large, and sits on the edge of traditional boundaries, so that it is not clear whether it is in Bow, Bethnal Green, or Hackney. Hence the common 'East London' tag. The Finchley park is in Finchley, and is unique in Finchley, so that name should be sufficient. Imc 08:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Submarine films

message: There is a recent Russian film, "72 Metra" (72 Meters). I don't know how to add anything to the article, though. 65.100.5.55 (talk) 06:15, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

message: Latitude Zero (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064470/)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.126.25.148 (talk) 14:39, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing Films 

message: The current sections seem unworkable to me. We start out categorizing films by when they were made; then we have a section for WWII films made after WWII, which seems pretty arbitrary to me; then it all falls apart. We've got a section for Korean War that only has one entry, a movie made during the Korean War but that takes place both before and during that war. I can't tell whether the Cold War section is supposed to be movies made during the Cold War (apparently not; we've got Phantom in there), about the Cold War (but then why is Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea in there?) or movies taking place during the Cold War (then why is there a separate section for Korean War?).
I think we should decide whether to list the movies chronologically by production or release date, or by subject matter, and stick to one or the other. Kendall-K1 (talk) 19:37, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Chronological is easiest.  The synopses can tell people what era each film is set in.  Obviously submarine films influence later submarine films, regardless of the period each film is set in, so it's a better way to track the development of the genre.  I agree it doesn't work very well in its current format, which is why I fiddled with it but maybe just scrap the current format altogether.  Xfpisher (talk) 20:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections and categories of films
Talk:Moment of Truth (film series)

message: I am removing several links, as they seem to go to wholly irrelevant pages. Jedikaiti (talk) 04:41, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Links 

message: Moment of truth: Movies were so good in the 90s. I remember Monday nights 9pm one would premiere and me and my mom would watch. It was probably one of the few things that me and my mom did together. They just don’t make them like this anymore. I found a person who links a lot of these movies to her Facebook and YouTube Channel. It’s called Megan’s Movies. She has loaded so many, ones that you can’t even find to purchase anymore. Every once in a while Tubi or Prime will have a few but there’s always the obscure ones you will always remember. Lifetime movies aren’t as good anymore. Something about these movies, they are based on facts and real life and the acting is usually good. 90sTeenDream (talk) 05:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  NBC TV Movies.. Lifetime and LMN
Talk:Frank Podmore

message: Hi, I'm quite new to editing wikipedia pages. Frank Podmore died in unusual circumstances and I'd like to add a "Death" section to his wiki page. I'm not 100% sure if that's the right thing to do, and also how to go about doing this. Any thoughts?
Politicscurator (talk) 10:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You have been removing reliable sources from the article. You might want to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia rules regarding fringe theories. 5.101.169.146 (talk) 01:46, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding "Death"
Talk:Electricity vampire

message: This article is redundant with the article standby power. Anything here should be merged into that article, and this article deleted. Thanks to the creator of the article for the interest in decreasing energy waste, since standby power may amount to 10% of residential electric use.Edison 20:07, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct so I made it a redirect. --Paul Studier 20:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:De Tomaso Mangusta

message: If you re-arrange the letters, Mangusta spells Mustang. -> No it doesn't.
Who recognizes this as the most beautiful Detomaso? I am not doubting that some may have this opinion but I would think most people would say the mid 80's Pantera is the masterpiece of Detomaso. This statement is opinion and should be removed.
:I agree, it's pure opinion.Scottanon 04:44, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello, I have came here to announce that I have made an edit to the article regarding the weight distribution. I can assure you that no Mangustas have ever had a 32:68 weight distribution. The manufacturer-written PDF  shows a 44:56 weight distribution. Even if De Tomaso did say the Mangusta had a 32/68 ratio, that would beat the rear-engined Porsche 911 in terms of rear weight distribution. No sources before 2010 have ever stated a 32/68 distribution either, according to a Google research . Simply put, the 32/68 number is bogus.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.90.113 (talk) 00:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Mangusta has ever left the factory with a 32/68 weight distribution. That's bizarre.
Talk:List of racism-related films

message: This is a fairly unregulated list at the moment - What are the criteria for inclusion? It currently seems to be films that merely hint at race / racism related issues - I suggest that is be for films that deal predominantly with race / racism related issues (e.g. Harold & Kumar Go to White Castle - even for a low-brow film, there is trivial coverage of race / racism) - Tiswas(t) 09:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On reflection, that was a bad example, considering the teacuppery surrounding the talk page of the article. Either way, there ought to be criteria for inclusion, of the list will become unmanageable and crufty - Tiswas(t) 12:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria for inclusion
Talk:Hubert Bland

message: Problems
1. Article was tagged “This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. January 2012)”
2. There were no sections and no lead.
My revision
1. Found citations for the article
2. Kept the old text, but expanded it based on reliable sources
3. Formatted the article with sections and lead
4. Did revision in one operation by cutting the old text and pasting revised text
5. I plan to add a Works section and a person info box. Vejlefjord (talk) 21:56, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explain my current revision
Talk:List of films based on magazine articles

message: What about Flash of Genius and Hunting Party? Does anyone have non-US examples?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.161.56.27 (talk) 12:46, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

message: The existing title of this article limits its scope to "films", but I thought I would point out that the new U.S. program APB on FOX is based on this article:
*
Not sure if its worth creating another list for TV shows as this is the only example I know of.  Maybe a new section right above See Also for TV programs? Anyone have any objections to that? --Krelnik (talk) 01:56, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2016 TV Show [[APB (TV series)|APB]]
Talk:Kō Bun'yū

message: Why is Ko listed as a Japanese writter? He's Taiwanese on a perminant residence card, he doesn't have Japanese citizenship.
It's missleading to call him a Japanese writter as it creates the impression that he's some kind of Japanese nationalist fanatic, when he's really just a nasty minded foreigner.
perfectblue 20:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of films based on stage plays or musicals

message: An alphabetic list is efficient for long list but with a list like this, its hard to monitor the entries. IMHO a chronological list by decades will be more efficient and easier to maintain.
Vivek 16:58, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetic List or Chronological List 

message: The film predated the stage play. I suggest we remove it.
I don't see Tobacco Road or One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (and others) on here because their screenplays don't derive from the stage plays but rather directly from their source novels. If we keep Clockwork then we must allow these others.  — HarringtonSmith (talk) 05:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No one is speaking up for keeping Clockwork... Unless someone does soon, I'll remove it. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 02:30, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Clockwork Orange'' 

message: Do we really want to include TV movies on this list — especially if there's already been a theatrical? I don't think so; what do you think? — HarringtonSmith (talk) 02:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV Movies
Talk:List of media based on Arthurian legend

message: WTF? Dragonheart is listed as a "close adaptation"? That movie has virtually nothing to do with King Arthur. 
I suggest we add another section about "movies with references to the Arthurian mythos". Or remove the peripheral ones entirely. 
But I'm too lazy to do it myself. SpectrumDT 23:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need more sections 

message: or the early 90s. I recall having seen a TV film subdivided in three or more parts on the Arthurian legend. It (especially the plot) closely resembled the movie Excalibur, released in 1981, but it was definetly of a later making. Does anyone else perhaps know the movie I am talking about?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.19.182.75 (talk) 08:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV film from the 80s 

message: Is The Natural too far removed from the original to be added to this list? __209.179.32.155 (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Natural 

message: I think we need to remove the comedy section and places the respective items in other parts. After all we have comedies in the TV section.Slatersteven (talk) 15:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: All over the show

message: I vote in favor-seems to be two different ways of saying the same thing.Agarak (talk) 05:50, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: What merger?Slatersteven (talk) 08:51, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No doubt the merge indicated at the top of the page; specifically between List of media based on Arthurian legend and List of media based on Arthurian legend. Support, given essentially identical scope. Klbrain (talk) 17:00, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh, well ijn that case I support too.Slatersteven (talk) 17:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The merger
Talk:Rally of Republican Lefts

message: "Rally of the Republican Lefts" is odd English; what was the original French name? - Jmabel | Talk 20:15, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think Rally of Republican Leftists is better, because lefts refers to persons. I found this translation via google see here. C mon 08:03, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

text: *I checked Google Books and found "Rally of Left Republicans", e.g. , , which seems more natural, so I moved it there. I suppose they are both Left and Republican. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:28, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: "Gauches" ("Lefts") is used in a French political context - it's not referring to several left-wing people, but to several left wing ideologies or movements. It is the correct translation even if it's not a term used much (at all?) in English-speaking countries. 62.253.137.130 (talk) 10:45, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

text: *I don't think there is such a word as "lefts" in English. As a noun "the left" is always singular. A possible translation would be "Rally of Republican Left-Wing Movements". But it seems simpler and more compact to follow the form used in the books, even if it is not absolutely precise. The RGR pulled together people and movements that were left-wing (some of them) and Republican. Aymatth2 (talk) 11:02, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: *When we say "the more active groups" in the Resistance, do we perhaps want to say "the most active groups"?
*When we say "In the same time" do we mean "In the same time period" or "Nonetheless"?
* When we say "the French left was defined as republican and the right as pro-monarchy" it might be clearer to say "left in France simply meant "not monarchist".
*Third force (France) is just a redirect to a disambiguation page.
*Does "under the leaderships of Pierre Mendès-France and François Mitterrand" mean "under the respective leaderships of Pierre Mendès-France and François Mitterrand"? 
Jmabel | Talk 00:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other issues