Talk:Wanda Tinasky

message: Rather than discussing everything at once, I think one issue at a time is more reasonable.
I changed your "space-hyphen-space" sequences to bald "em-dashes". You changed them back. I included a tiny bit of discussion on this, but I assume it was lost in the crowd.
The reason I made the change is that Wikipedia policy regarding American versus British conventions is to follow the subject matter's nationality, if relevant, and if there is no relevant Wikipedia style override. Wanda Tinasky and all the characters involved are American. The Wikipedia style guide on dashes refers immediately to the dashes link. Inside, you can find the American versus British disagreement on dash style to mark off parenthetical comments.
--192.35.35.34 23:07, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Dash]] it all 

message: 192.35.35.3*, I have repeatedly       asked you to stop vandalising comments, and you have repeatedly ignored these requests ("I had to violate the recommendation about preserving your writing"). In light of this, I am withdrawing from further discussion with you on this topic until you're prepared to abide by the rules ("don't edit someone's words to change their meaning").
:If you're really interested in having a constructive discussion, I strongly suggest you learn to quote rather than vandalising my comments with interlineations. 
chocolateboy 18:55, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, progress! Can you cite an example of an interlineation of mine that had the effect of vandalism? The ones I've looked over are obviously non-vandalism. Apparently one of them somewhere somehow strikes you as vandalism, but you won't tell me which one.--192.35.35.35 21:45, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: You have made your repeated requests, and like pretty much every last one of your citations of the rules, you have given absolutely no indication in what sense you think the rules apply. I have read the rules page in question many times, and also the pages on vandalism, and as far as I can see, you're shooting bad faith blanks, and are engaged in a bad faith effort to avoid discussing the issues regarding what a Wanda Tinasky page should look like.--192.35.35.35 20:22, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: Second time around. Yes, you have, and you continue to absolutely refuse to identify what you mean. Just like you absolutely refuse to justify your other lists of Wikisins you allege I have committed. And I stand by my quotation, for the reasons stated when I wrote it. You're merely quoting it out of context, and now scoring worthless bad faith huffy points on it. The issue remains, you've gone out of your way to absolutely refuse to discuss pretty much any points regarding the page, and have invented imaginary reasons to excuse your refusals, and larded it with ridiculous bombastic exaggerations.--192.35.35.35 22:02, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: Third time around. It would help if you identify an actual example of my alleged vandalism, or an example of the meanings of your words changed by my edits. For example, when I accuse you of quoting me out of context, I refer to the specific sentence ("my quotation"). Of course, what it all boils down to is you do not because you cannot.--192.35.35.35 17:10, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism