lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lake Compounce

message: I'm proposing a merge of all non-roller coaster ride articles into this article, similar to what is at Luna Park Sydney. Most of these ride articles are better covered by their ride type article (compare Rotor (Lake Compounce) to Rotor (ride)), and moving the bulk of the text into this article, combined with wikilinks connecting here and the ridetype article would serve more of a purpouse displaying the park. Also, many of these articles have a hideous POV and flavourtexting (I again refer to their Rotor and its "shocking visuals"... Rotors ain't that bad).itss sooo fun.
To accomplish this, I'm suggesting that the height restriction information be removed, because I personally consider this to be both unencyclopedic miniature and the specific domain of the park's website and ticketing department.
I'm putting mergeto tags on all of these articles, and if there is no protest at the end of one week, I will complete the merge. -- saberwyn 20:43, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ride articles 

message: :A few things. One, the "everybody else is doing it" argument is a valid concern, however I am attempting to tidy up all rides that aren't a ride type, a roller coaster or a simulator to create more presentable and holistic amusement park articles. Lake Compounce was unfortunately the first park I 'picked on' after my own.
:Secondly, I think I should demonstrate what I intend, because I think I can salvage most of the info, but keep it cut down and presentable. Have a look at User:Saberwyn/Lake Compounce Rides for an example, once I write it up.
:If you still don't think this idea has some merit, and only want to merge some articles, there are two options. One is to only merge some, which will result in either a mess as some articles appear and some don't, or a loss of information as the article is just blanket redirected. Things will get more complicated, but I'm sure that I can sort out appropriate merges. -- saberwyn 23:33, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Custom rides should retain their own articles

message: Can anyone verify/give a source that "The park is currently owned by Parques Reunidos, headquarted in Madrid Spain."? According to the official website, it's owned by Kennywood entertainment still. http://www.lakecompounce.com/lake-compounce-about-us.php But it could just not be updated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ThanatosInstinct (talk • contribs) 20:31, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actually changed hands? 

message: — Assignment last updated by BrieBernier24 (talk) 21:56, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: JRN 101 News Literacy
Talk:Wall Street station (IRT Lexington Avenue Line)

message: It is true that there is an out-of-system connection to Broad Street from this station; however, it doesn't really have a place in the infobox. "Transfers" are intended to show free in-system connections between subway lines. "Connections" are to show nearby stations of other rail systems (e.g., PATH, LIRR, MNRR, ferry connetions (e.g., Staten Island Ferry), and transportation to airports (e.g., AirTrain JFK, M60 bus).
It certainly would not be appropriate to include nearby stations that are not connected but can be reached by exiting fare control and walking surface streets to get to; the way I see it, an out-of-system underground connection is really no different than exiting and walking over. — Larry V (talk | contribs) 03:35, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connection
Talk:Zinnia angustifolia

message: ~~
According to 
NC State University
This seesm to be Z. elegans, which has the same cultivars,
From the same source,  Z. agustifolia has the following cultivars:
Golden & Golden Orange
If I found a second reference that indicatest this is indeed Z. elegans, I will rename the page.
Thanks
----
USDA PLANTS Database states: (From their maps)
 Zinnia angustifolia Kunth is located in the US only in UT (An only in ONE County there)
which collide with what is stated in this article.
--JuanPDP 03:12, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:KMAC Museum

message: I did some initial cleanup on the new content added by the curator of the museum, but it still reads too much like a brochure.  I suppose this is hard to avoid, coming from its curator.  But nevertheless, this is an encyclopedia article, not a sales brochure, so it needs further updates. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 15:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has had little attention to it since it's creation. I did a big overhaul to remove its brochure feel. Add an infobox, two references, and reworded a lot. Yet the article still needs some tender loving care. If anyone could help by expanding its references, it would be great. -Jahnx (talk) 07:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Still reads too much like a brochure
Talk:Gavan O'Connor

message: Gavan, you supported the ordinary people of Corio far beyond the call of duty and your support will be returned when we get to vote on November 24th.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.131.180.197 (talk) 06:34, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:H. Russell Wakefield

message: Can the editor variously appearing as the AOL proxy addresses 172.142.49.12, 172.189.61.234, 172.201.254.55, and 172.202.216.148, who has already violated WP:TRR, justify the repeated reinstating of unsourced POV material and deletions of relevant material in this article? Deor 04:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I agree with the excision of the unsourced paragraph about W.'s appearance, voice, and personal habits; however, the material about the existence and source of misogyny and violence in his stories is equally unsourced and is certainly speculative (constituting a clear violation of WP:OR), as is the identification of Clinton with Crowley. This material should be readded only if reliable sources supporting the statements are cited. Further sources for, and expansion of, the biographical information in the article would also be welcome, as the article is rather thin on details of his life, and some of the details are contradicted by information I've seen elsewhere. It would be nice if editors would concentrate on adding verifiable material to the article, and verifying the material that's already present, rather than inserting their own essays in literary criticism. Wikipedia is the place for the former, not the latter. Deor (talk) 16:06, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV, OR, and sources
Talk:Halfbeak

message: That photo is of a subadult fish. It's about 4 cm long. But yes, the grow bigger, to about 10 cm. Cheers, Neale 20:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Hemirhaphodon'' photo 

message: The diet portion of this article really should discuss Hemiramhpid herbivory.  In this light, the Tibbetts and Carseldine 2005 paper on ontogenetic trophic shifts is misrepresented.  It does not conclude that garfish shift diet according to season, (Klumpp and Roberts 1983 and Coetzee 1981 are both better references for that) but that the three herbivorous species discussed in the paper start out life as carnivores and shift to herbivory.
Ryandday 05:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Hemiramphid diet'' 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Corvus coronoides talk 14:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps (Pass)
Talk:Louisville Slugger Museum & Factory

message: This page could use some attention, I think.--Bedford 00:50, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Muhammad Ali Center

message: I think I'll leave the photo request template on this, as we'll need interior museum images as the article grows.  I have a couple of those I could use, but right now, the article is too short to insert them. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 01:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: I'm an Ali fan, but the image caption "Throughout his life, Muhammad Ali strived to be guided by these core principles in his quest to inspire people around the world, dedicating himself to helping others, being the best athlete he could be and by standing up to what he believed in." is either POV or a museum quotation.  This needs to be clarified. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 18:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was from my article at American Byways, and that quote was derived from the Media Kit distributed by the museum.  Seicer (talk) (contribs) 18:28, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not going to remove it, but some editor could easily come along and think "That's obviously POV" and remove it.  A citation will secure it. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 18:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image caption
Talk:Lynn Arnold

message: I removed the no refs box. I think the details of an SA premier are pretty much public knowledge and don't need detailed refs. Rocksong 03:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of hotels in New York City

message: As it stands, the page is just an invitation to spammers. I think it should be deleted or merged within the NYC article but I will wait for other users to weigh in. There are certainly editors which would be able to write an interesting article on the history of hotels in NYC, their development, their rivalries and so on. I'm just not the person to do that and in the meantime I feel that the whole article will remain what it currently is: a soon-to-be central target of spam. Pascal.Tesson 03:58, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm tempted to prod-tag it, though I suppose it may be possible to come up with a "history of hotels in New York" as the Hotels in London article has.  At the moment, it's basically duplicating what the Hotels in New York category already does. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

text: But that's exaclty the problem I have. This would not get consensus to delete if we tag it as AfD. We have to hunt down someone who knows enough about the subject to build someting like Hotels in London. Any ideas? Pascal.Tesson 21:13, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  IT couldn't be merged with the NYC article, which is allready long and could always be much larger but for separate NYC related article. Something like Hotels in London would be great, but I don't know how that is going to get done. - Matthew238 01:38, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

text: This article was an unreferenced train wreck. It was devoted almost totally to the Plaza (which is now a relatively small hotel).  The only way to make it useful and encyclopedic is to add the rooms criteria.  I'm ameanable to expanding the list but the hotels should be at least 500 rooms. Americasroof (talk) 05:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Ramsau am Dachstein

message: Of the links that were added 17:30, 9 January 2007 I removed three:
http://www.krkholiday.hr/vacationdirectory/europe.htm doesn't relate to Ramsau am Dachstein in any specific way
http://www.obergrabnerhof.at and http://www.almfrieden.at are, without a doubt, nice hotels located in Ramsau am Dachstein, but Wikipedia shouldn't be used for advertising. As there are hundreds of hotels in Ramsau am Dachstein I don't see why there should be links to specifically those two. There is a link to the website of the tourist board - so anybody who wants to find out about accommodation in Ramsau am Dachstein can easily do so!
Finally, http://austria.europe-mountains.com/styria/ramsau-am-dachstein.aspx is a very informative link, so I left it intact. Thanks to the anonymous contributor who provided it.
Schekuli 15:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit as of 15:27, 13 January 2007

message: While this article is not really a translation (I don't believe in translations ;)), I relied quite heavily on the German-language article in writing some of the sections. If somebody could transfer some of the pictures from the German Wiki that would be great. The nice aerial shot would go well with the ==Geography== section, the Protestant church could be put into the ==History== section. Finally, the map could be put next to the introduction...
Thanks
Schekuli 04:01, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Original article
Talk:Banderole

message: Including this among categories concerned with clothing blurs the categories. I haven't deleted the category, however. --Wetman 04:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will. Churchh 04:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories

message: With regards to these edits what the cited source Eb1911 says is:
"in architecture, a band used in decorative sculpture of the Renaissance period for bearing an inscription, &c."
The OED brakes them into two:
*3.A ribbon-like scroll bearing a device or inscription.
**1622    F. Markham Five Decades Epist. of Warre ii. ix. 74   His Colors‥are euermore contained in the Band-role vpon which his Crest standeth.
**1875    C. D. E. Fortnum Maiolica iii. 30   Portraits of ladies with a ribbon or banderole on which the name is inscribed.
*4. Archit. A flat band with an inscription, used in decorating buildings of the Renaissance period.
Now it is possible that "ribbon-like scroll bearing a device or inscription" that is not heraldic was used in the middle ages (although not called that in contemporary English language documents), but it needs a source. We can not add information before a cited source that extrapolates beyond what the sources says. (see WP:INTEGRITY ) -- PBS (talk) 09:34, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither of these are RS for art history. The slightest acquaintance with the subject shows they are par excellence medieval, as does the Romanesque image used at the main article. I will add a proper source later. Johnbod (talk) 10:10, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Never said they were, but they are both reliable sources, so I suggest that until such time as another more specialised reliable sources is added we revert the text to the version that is supported by the sources. If as you as it is common parlance in the field then it will be easy for you to find a suitable source. -- PBS (talk) 12:34, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it was, and would have been for you too. Talking of references, what makes that heraldry website a RS? And it is absurd to reference EB 1911 as "Chisholm, 1911", if we must use it, which actually we mustn't. The OED is a general dictionary, mostly written over a century ago, and should not be used in this way. It is especially poor on art history, where the vocabulary was just forming. That's before we get on to your very dubious (and undiscussed - OF COURSE) move of the page. Johnbod (talk) 21:26, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I was reverting your bold and undiscussed move ;-) Thank you for supplying a better source. I suggest however that we remove the additional text that you have added and keep the section as brief a possible (as a summary style paragraph), otherwise it will continue to grow and will become a content fork for the speech scroll section on banderoles. -- PBS (talk) 02:09, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There was no one to discuss it with then, when clearly there is now.  The section is shorter that at the other article, and should not be removed or shortened without restoring the plain term as a disam page.  Johnbod (talk) 12:35, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Art and architecture
Template talk:World rock

message: Surely the header is better linking to Rock music rather than rock and roll ?  -- Beardo 04:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair point, hadn't noticed that before. I don,t think anybody would have opposed if you'd changed it yourself, though. Circeus 04:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Red is the colour for rock info boxes. Is there a reason why this template is light blue? If there is no objection in a reasonable time I will change it to fit in with other templates.--SabreBD (talk) 10:05, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Colour

message: I was googling for a concept in geology and one of the things that turned up was "Mexican rock".  But that was about rock music, not about geology.  I moved it to Mexican rock music.  I did the same thing with Icelandic rock music.  There's a lot of work to do here, obviously.  All the others need to get changed in this template and the articles need to get moved.  I mentioned this on the talk page of the rock music Wikiproject more than a month ago.  Not much has happened yet, if anything. Michael Hardy (talk) 23:51, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not geology!
Category talk:Radio stations in the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex

message: I am unable to edit this "category" page.  Can a Wikipedia  Administrator please relocate the WBAP link to its own "W" alphabetical category?  Please?  Thank you.  User:ProfessorPaul 04:10, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To change the categorization of a page, you need to edit the article page.  The categories are at the bottom.  However, I'm not sure what the problem is -- is WBAP not in Dallas-Fort Worth? -- Visviva 07:21, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: We have a WBAP problem
Talk:Pran Nath (physicist)

message: I removed the expand and orphan templates again.  The expand template states as it's purpose:
:Template purpose:
:*Notification to editors that an article does not sufficiently cover the topic, yet the article is not considered a stub.
This article is a stub, and so that template should not be used.
I removed the orphan template because there are 4 articles which link to this page, and so it doesn't really seem orphaned anymore.  --Starwed 08:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. An article(especially on of this specificity) can only link so many places.--Cronholm144 08:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Templates

message: This article has come a long way in only five days! Three cheers for the contributors! Tualha (Talk) 15:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow!
Talk:Otter Creek Outdoor Recreation Area

message: Otter Creek has been closed for the time being. The future is uncertain. It is possible that it will be reopened by the City of Louisville, it may be sold to the federal government, or it may be sold to the public.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.28.23.135 (talk) 02:01, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is all in the article... right? Except it's not actually closing until 1/1. --Rividian (talk) 02:53, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closure 
Talk:Chin-Feng Chen

message: I've removed several links to 1) Personal website claiming to be the "official site", 2) Touring agency website.  We should restrict the links to MLB, ESPN, reputable news media, and sports-statistics sites.  They are from the same ground of people that put such links on Chien-Ming Wang's page. Please watch. Kenimaru 02:18, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watch for Soilicing Web Links 

message: Is he Ami or Siraya? The Chin-hui Tsao page says both are Ami. --Awiseman 20:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone? --AW 22:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that this is the Taiwanese project, anybody? --AW 21:37, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone? --AW 15:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, fifth try. --AW 21:19, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

text: He is 3/4 Sirayan.--Jerry 21:30, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aboriginal ancestry question 

message: We should probably get rid of the MLB infobox because there are two infoboxes, and the MLB one has less statistics.--Jerry 21:09, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 
Talk:Wilson C. Edsell

message: Why would anyone consider a senator, founder of a major university, AND founder of the first national bank worthless?  Unless it's because he was a Prohibitionist?  Prohibition is part of American history!  I see no reason why such an influential man from the American Reconstruction Era would be considered worthless!  Please explain the imprimatur for this.  --SHLAMA 04:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely not a speedy deletion, IMO.  If the person who tagged it believes the subject fails notability, then AfD is the venue and absolutely not CSD.  Geogre 04:33, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Geogre. --SHLAMA 04:59, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contesting ''speedy deletion''
Talk:The Frustrators

message: I created one of these a while ago, and it got deleted, any news on why?
--Jude 08:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

message: green day has nothing to do with this  band except for mike dirnt.--Greenday21 (talk) 22:24, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green Day 
Talk:Anžej Dežan

message: Please find a reliable source for the claim that I have just deleted Mad Jack 04:38, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Central Park, Louisville

message: Is this park still 17 acres?  I mean, I live near it and it's maybe a city block or two. --NewtΨΦ 01:43, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to , yes, it's still 17 acres. Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 01:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  17 acres?
Talk:Cave Hill Cemetery

message: Might they have grown enough for them to be moved to their own article/list? Maybe List of interments in Cave Hill Cemetery, or something on that order. Just a humble suggestion. :) --Ebyabe 02:14, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  so many interments 

message: I am unable to find any resource that shows Cave Hill to be a National Historic Landmark, although it is certainly on the National Register of Historic Places.  If it's a landmark, can this be referenced somehow?  Thanks! Stevie is the man! Talk • Work 23:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NHL or NRHP?

message: I removed it from AFD as speedy keep. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2007 July 18#Cave Hill Cemetery. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 20:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD

message: Because he's still alive having faked his death so many years ago.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Al Borland 6100 (talk • contribs) 05:06, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Col. Sanders isn't really buried here . . . 
Talk:Louisville Waterfront Park

message: This article was reading too much like a Chamber of Commerce brochure, so I've been trying to rectify that.  Just wanted to let everyone know. —  Stevie is the man!  Talk • Work 16:38, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Brochure-itis