lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Redirects

message: On 17 March 2021, Morriswa created Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Redirects/Alaska/Route list. From a discussion on that page's talk page, we know that she created it by copying markup from a subpage from some state/territory page, but she doesn't remember which one. This template is generating misnested tags and stripped tags lint errors. For example, in Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Redirects/Alaska, * expands to *, which expands to
* </span>
Alaska Route 98 Route 98 (Alaska) Alaska State Highway 98 Alaska State Route 98 disambiguation

If not for the asterisk,  would be OK, but because of the asterisk, the opening  is within a  generated by the asterisk, while the closing  is outside . This can be fixed either by moving the  to start on the line after the file(s), or by removing all of the line breaks. The stripped  at the end of the first line is obvious in this case; the code will have to be rewritten to tighten the matching of opening and closing  tags. Similar problems exist for Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Redirects/Nebraska/Highway list and Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Redirects/Puerto Rico/Highway list. The only reason I know about these three "templates" is that they are called from other Wikipedia namespace "templates" listed at Lint errors: Multiple unclosed formatting tags. Someone who knows what's going on should be able to fix the Alaska route list "template", and once that is done, the fix should be propagated to related "templates" in this project. —Anomalocaris (talk) 00:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Just in case, I will ping some of the more seasoned members of Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads for their help and expertise, since they are much better with this than I am:     Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I also think that commonality and a mutual uniformity for each of these pages should be used, with every level of highway covered: Interstate, U.S., state, county, etc. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 01:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misnested tags, missing end tags, stripped tags
Talk:Graphium macleayanus

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Graphium macleayanus.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 5, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-07-05. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 23:25, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Graphium macleayanus.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:Drury Lane

message: After following the link for the Knights of the Garter, I ended up looking through the list of the Knights of the Garter http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Knights_and_Ladies_of_the_Garter and I noticed that Sir William Drury is nowhere to be found, I'm not sure if this is a mistake on the list, or on this article; just thought I'd bring this to everyone's attention. Ductape821 (talk) 23:51, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Did Drury Lane use to have soliders guarding it? If so, why?  The statement is found in the 'Strand' section of arthurlloyd.co.uk ( the part dealing with Romano's)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.53.121 (talk) 09:49, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Military Guard
Talk:Gower Street, London

message: Is it safe to add that it is called after Gower Peninsula in Wales? Rather than after one of the many people named Gower (surname)? GuidoGer (talk) 14:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name 

message: Can anyone add which London Borough, Gower Street is in?  Skinsmoke (talk) 11:19, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Camden. It's not included in the article as although it's in the borough, it's not in Camden Town itself (the borough is larger than the area it's named for), and "Gower Street is in Camden" would be potentially misleading. – iridescent 11:22, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nobody asked to write "Gower Street is in Camden", which is indeed misleading, but something like "It belongs to the Borough of Camden", possibly adding "but it not in Camden Town itself (the borough is larger than the area it is named for)". GuidoGer (talk) 14:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  London Borough
Talk:Miss America 2008

message: why is there not a seprate page for this show? who has been in the top 3 and bottom 3 thus far. What role does it play in the actual pageant? what are the teams they were split into and why??? all of this stuff I would like to know.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.78.235.101 (talk) 23:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miss America: Reality Check 

message: Miss America 2008#Crossovers begins
:For the first time since Miss America 2003, four former Miss Universe Organization titleholders competed at Miss America.
and proceeds to list five competitors. --Thnidu (talk) 01:04, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  4=5? 
Talk:Legion of Galactic Guardians 2099

message: *merge/nom - Spider-Boy 2099 is a cool character, but one that exists almost exclusivly in meta-fiction.  His listed first appearance is his only appearance in Spider-Boy Team-up #1, which was also the first and only appearance of the Legion of Galactic Guardians.  There is a no real world information to support the SB 2099 article (very little for the Galactic Guardians either), but the so little information, and a single appearance, this is no viable reason that SB 2099 should stand as his own article. As he is a separate character from Spider-Boy, similar to Superboy and Monel, I can't rationalize his merger to Spider-boy article, so he should go then to the Legion due to they appear exclusively together. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 08:11, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged due to no response. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 03:50, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Spider-Boy 2099]] Merge
Talk:Frightful Five

message: I looked on the Amalgam page and saw no mention of the Frightful Five.  I did see mention of the Frightful Five as one incarnation of the Frightful Four, therefore  I redirected this page to the Frightful Four page.   Should anyone find evidence of the Amalgam version, maybe we can set up a disambiguation page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.90.157.11 (talk) 12:58, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Template talk:Modern IFV and APC

message: Some of these vehicles don't appear to be all that modern, such as the VXB, which is currently being replaced by the VAB. What is the going definition for "modern"??Tmaull 17:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Modern

message: I added a few more vehicles that I believe are to be considered modern wheeled APCs and IFVs.--Lan Di (talk) 20:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Added

message: There are a couple vehicles in this navbox that are not really IFVs, but more cargo trucks. For example, the Logistics Vehicle System has a trailer module that can be fitted as a troop transport, but it's incredibly rare. bahamut0013♠♣  17:10, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible removes 

message: Is there any particular reason to exclude tracked APCs and IFVs? There does not currently seem to be a template for tracked APC/IFVs, and I think they could be included in this template. MKFI (talk) 17:06, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not as far as I can see, though I'd rather see this template split into two separate templates if tracked vehicles are going to be included as this one is already quite large.  One for tracked, one for wheeled. - Jonathon A H (talk) 08:52, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include tracked vehicles? 

message: I've removed two articles from this template that we're deleted and are now red links per the instructions at Wikipedia:Templates with red links. Both are listed at List of modern armoured fighting vehicles and List of armoured fighting vehicles by country. There are over 20 red linked IFV/APC articles that could be added to this template from these lists alone, should we want them here. I've no objections to adding them back when and if articles for them are written. Gobonobo T C 05:01, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Listing red linked articles

message: I began to clean up this template. There are a lot of things listed in this that are neither a IFV (armored, with turret and at least 20mm auto-cannon) nor APCs (armored, armed). Also there are some old vehicles (introduction over 50 years ago), prototypes that were never adopted and non-military protected vehicles in this list. Also protected trucks, protected jeeps and various armored cars, tank destroyers etc. are in this list, but should not be. Furthermore there are duplicate entries for the same system (for the 8x8 and 6x6 variant, which both lead to the same article). noclador (talk) 21:27, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: There is a discussion about this template at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Military_history#Template_about_Modern_IFV_and_APC. noclador (talk) 01:36, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at WikiProject Military history 

message: There is a difference between:
* Infantry fighting vehicle
* Armoured personnel carrier
* Mortar carrier
* Infantry mobility vehicle
* Mine-resistant, ambush protected vehicle
* Tank destroyer
* Armored car
* Reconnaissance vehicle
* Light Armoured Patrol Vehicle
and only the first two of these belong to the template. noclador (talk) 12:30, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armored Fighting vehicles
Talk:Little Green Street

message: This was tagged with uncited and WP:NPOV warnings. As the proposal was not put into effect (see here) it doesn't seem to be history any more and I'm about to delete it. --Old Moonraker (talk) 12:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Recent history" section 
Talk:Siddhayoga

message: There appears to be two articles discussing this topic. The titles are the same, except one splits the term into two words. I suggest the two articles be merged by someone familiar with the topic. --Evb-wiki 22:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This sounds like a good idea if the article is fully expanded to include all siddhayoga traditions. For example Hinduism Today frequently reports on major South Indian Siddha lineages. They have also mentioned various smaller groups, and this merger would give them the change to be known. Your idea is also good because it will give a truer understanding of the impact siddhayoga has in the world today. But to be clear, these are two very different sects/lineages, so if that is the criterion, then no, it is best they remain separate  --Babaji108 01:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If these are two different sects, as User:TheRingess had stated on the Siddha Yoga talk page, then we should probably leave them seperate. I thought they were discussing the same movement. --Evb-wiki 01:51, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is one of the reasons for creating this page, to help clarify the confusion and affirm there are other siddhayoga --Babaji108 02:05, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  propose merge with [[Siddha Yoga]] 

message: Have added 5 citations to the 'About Siddhayoga' section as per the box requesting more citations. If they are adequate, how can that box be removed; if they are not adequate, please educate me some more on what is required. Many thanks to all who are so kind to take time and effort to clean up this site and explain things to me. 
:Wiki is quite an amazing concept - very similar to Vedic ideals - eg everyone gets heard, fairness and even-handedness, even Yoga Vani is written with copious citations to original Vedic texts... there's a lot in common between Wiki and Vedic... --Babaji108 00:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Added citations

message: I do not think this is special enough to be included here;
In the Bhagavad Gita, Arjuna asks Lord Krishna about externally defining an internal experience: what are the behaviors of an enlightened person? How do they walk, talk, sit, etc? Krishna says enlightened people are not know through physical habits but through how peacefully they behave in various life situations, how they remain clear-minded in times of crisis, free from the grip of pleasures, attachments, fear, and anger.Bhagavad Gita for Modern Times, 2:56 Such a person finds more Divine pleasure within than from their external sensory experience.Bhagavad Gita for Modern Times, 2:61
Redheylin (talk) 01:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dump
Talk:Aiguillette (ornament)

message: Surely this is the historical basis for the modern aiguillette?  In which case, perhaps this article would be better merged there, as a history section? -- !! ?? 10:05, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is the origin of both aiguillette and aglet.  I have considered whether merging is appropriate, or making a "main" article with sub articles.  Open to suggestions. - PKM 16:25, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical basis 

message: There is far too much overlap and duplication for two articles. -- BullRangifer (talk) 14:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree!  I think this article should be merged with both Aiguillette and Aglet. - PKM (talk) 22:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Aiguillette]]?
Talk:Backcountry snowboarding

message: This article is more about how to Backcountry Snowboard, than about it. It should either be renamed or deleted, and a new aticle written about it. I don't think it should be deleted, as it is an excellently written page. Randaly 18:01, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled discussion

message: There is too much on how to choose a snowboard, boots, bindings etc. That should be undersnowboarding(La Ola es Mian (talk) 07:39, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've completely rewritten the article here. Some of the information should be re-added with proper citations. Otherwise, wikification is complete, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 16:44, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikification
Talk:Gai

message: is Gai really used gay?
how about we include how Gai is used in japan as the word guy.
example
Maito Gai
Mambi55 18:03, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The link for GAI (the Irish Palestine charity) links to the page for GAI (the Russian traffic police).
173.74.111.140 (talk) 02:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faulty hyperlink
Talk:Marchitecture

message: Stop putting portmanteau on every page in Wikipedia! Geez. Signed, the manteaun revolutionary front
:This article seems to be an urban dictionary entry that grew up to become a blog posting.  -Concernedresident's butler OMG! Ponies! 17:18, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint

message: — Assignment last updated by Seakob3 (talk) 18:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: SSC199 TY2
Talk:Moment distribution method

message: Nice article - my thanks to whoever wrote it. One comment - there is no standard engineering convention for moment diagrams  - I propose making a clarification on this point. It is usual at Cal Poly and in the UK to show positive bending moment on the tension side of the diagram. --Muchado (talk) 03:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moment diagrams 

message: As a retired structural designer I can tell you for sure that this method was in common use well after 1960. wgoetsch (talk) 14:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of use  

message: Hello.
I found an error in the example shown in Wikipedia for the Moment Distribution Method.
The first load (P) is located at a distance a = 3 meters measured from the left support.
The Fixed End moments are calculated correctly, but when it comes to the determination of the shear and moment diagram it was assumed wrongly that the load is now located at the middle of the first span.
Respectfully.
David Guerrero.
Civil/Structural Supervising Engineer.
Worley Parsons.
713 407 7271.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrywall (talk • contribs) 06:34, 13 August 2008
:I've corrected them. Thanks. --Sjhan81 (talk) 05:43, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the diagrams 

message: Hello,
Where you equate the DFs of A → B and D → C, there is an error. The distribution factor from an exterior fixed support to an interior support is equal to 0. The fixed support to the right has an assumed infinite rotational stiffness. Therefore the DF from D to C = (K sub DC)/(K sub DC+∞). Hence, DF sub DC approaches (0)zero as the stiffness of the support approaches (∞)infinity.
Sorry, I'm not so great with the syntax in wiki.
Robert J. Miller III, E.I.T.
Staff Engineer
Engineering & Technical Consultants
Columbia, MD
 
Structural Analysis, 6th ed.
R.C. Hibbelar
Chapter 12, pp 469-481  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robvh1984 (talk • contribs) 16:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  distribution factors 

message: I guess the diagrams for first span are not correct. 
Shear force should be 5.84 (not 3.84) and -4.16 (not -6.16). Maximum bending moment should be 17.5 (not 19.2).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saeed3285 (talk • contribs) 08:33, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Diagrams
Talk:Slope deflection method

message: Article section 2.1 - Derivation of slope deflection equations
When a simple beam of length  and flexural rigidity  is loaded at each end with counterclockwise moments  and , member end rotations occur in the same direction. These rotation angles can be calculated using the unit dummy force method or Darcy's Law.
The link to the Darcy's Law page goes here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darcy%27s_Law
This law is about fluid flow in a porous material - and I can't see the relevance. Is there another Darcy's law? 
I can't find it but the article should be corrected, either to the correct page, removed or explained.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.5.15.111 (talk) 16:36, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect ref to Darcy's law?
Talk:History of the Church–Turing thesis

message: Jeezum crow 'bot, gimme a few minutes. A person's gotta start somewhere! I've linked the page, and entered some stuff. wvbaileyWvbailey 18:12, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  hang on while I construct the page 

message: Based on the work done on the article thus far, I don't think the original deletion tag applies anymore. The article still probably needs work, but shouldn't be subject to speedy deletion. --Bfigura (talk) 20:40, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Deletion Tag 

message: Gandy and Sieg etc. are actually using this "computor" to make a distinction, although I find it very confusing, myself. I can't remember whether a "computor" is a human-as-computer or is it a "computer"? -- i.e. the old use of the word from Turing's time ("computer" was a person who cranked numbers at a desk calculator). wvbaileyWvbailey 14:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computers and Computors 

message: Shouldn't László Kalmár's argument be mentioned? Kalmar, L. 1959. 'An Argument        Against the Plausibility of Church's Thesis'. In Heyting, A. (ed.) 1959.        Constructivity in Mathematics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp.72-80.Kope (talk) 13:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not familiar with it. It would be an interesting addition; if you are familiar with it, go ahead and add it. BillWvbailey (talk) 15:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kalmár's argument 

message: For discussion of the material on concurrency, please see . — Carl (CBM · talk) 23:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concurrency material removed
Talk:3,4-Methylenedioxy-N-hydroxyamphetamine

message: There seems to be an effort not to mention psychedelics like 2C-B, 2C-D and 5-Meo-Mipt which have very clear and strong entactogenic/empathogenic effects. The two categories are not mutually exclusive.2A02:2F0A:C070:979:2171:6923:C438:3816 (talk) 14:09, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples are kind of conservative 

message: Would the O-acetyl derivative be more potent like morphine to heroin?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.161.0.28 (talk) 23:05, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  N-Acetoxy-MDA
Talk:Methyl-DOB

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :C12H18BrNO2 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 11#C12H18BrNO2 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  ~~~~User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:03, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "C12H18BrNO2" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Bernard II, Count of Besalú

message: The sentence "He was a strong proponent of the Gregorian reforms, perhaps to dispel suspicions about his involvement in the murder of his brother." was referenced to The First Crusaders, 1095–1131 by Riley-Smith, p. 45, but page 45 simply includes a list of supporters of reform in Languedoc and includes Bernard II on that list. Bernard may have been trying to demonstrate his innocence but it is not discussed in that book, either on page 45 or any other page that I could find.Leschnei (talk) 20:57, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  original research
Talk:Holborn Viaduct

message: 2 million pounds? Source? this money could buy a fleet of ironclads. NVO (talk) 20:57, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cost

message: I find the claim that noone had ever built a road bridge over a road before 1864-9 to be a bit far-fetched.  No Roman or Chinese city had hills and a need to build a 'road' bridge from one high point to another?  Inca cities got any bridges that carry road traffic? What do you call a 'road' anyway?  Anything wide enough for a cart? I have had a look via google and can't find anything... anyone out there got a history of road bridges or something?  Any copies of a speech from the day, or perhaps the bill of parliament approving the thing?  I bet that'd have such a claim were it to be true.  Otherwise, I think we should remove the 'fact' *until* it can be backed up? --Ant (talk) 12:58, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Complete nonsense - without even looking, I can tell you that Highgate Archway (carried Hornsey Lane over the Great North Road, on the site of what's now Suicide Bridge) was built in 1813, decades before Holborn Viaduct. – iridescent 13:08, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest Road-over-road bridge?
Talk:Houndsditch

message: I've done some minor updating to this entry I'm not 100% certain of the latitude, longitude and os_grid_reference. I took them from the Bishopsgatge ward --Johnlumgair (talk) 10:07, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine, these things are only entered approximately. Kbthompson (talk) 10:35, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, strictly, this is a road, not a place ... perhaps just use  Kbthompson (talk) 10:44, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lime Street, London

message: Between 1954 and 1957 James Woodford made 4 murals showing
the Elements
- Air (Male angel with aircraft and bird)
- Fire (Fire-fighting figure astride phoenix)
- Earth (Sower of seed on tree background with sheep and pig at feet)
- Water (Bell-chiming figure with fish below and seagulls to sides)
The bell represents the Lutine Bell owned by Lloyds
They were unveiled on the exterior of Lloyds building on Billiter Steet/ Lime Street in 1957.
Following the demolition of the building they were put into storage, but in 2009 they were re-established on Lime Street, next to the Willis building.
Source: "Public sculpture of the city of London"
To see a photograph, use this google search: "Public Sculpture" "James Woodford"
It appears under "books.google.co.uk"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.97.213.233 (talk) 23:37, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled