Talk:Know your customer

message: Where is it?
Not one word about how costly KYC procedures are in time, money and
customer annoyance (Many who find KYC be akin to be spying on them).
Which is the single most innovation stiffling thing in the finicial sector.
Not to speak of how much it enables identity theft and such hassles.
:Zarutian (talk) 00:10, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: This is not a copyright infringement. I wrote the article and the agreement with ACAMS is that I can republish subject to an acknowledgement of where first published i.e. ACAMS Today, July 2006.
Let's hear some debate about the merits or otherwise of the suggested defibtion for EDD!
Peter Warrack Peterwarrack 01:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Combating Terroristical Financing" according to CFT. This definately needs some style changes.
Is this of any relation to the old "Know your endorser" thing they had to deal with paperhangers? 68.39.174.238 10:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: The article contains an extensive quotation, from a source cited in the article, but it is not clear where the quotation actually ends.  If in fact the quotation continues after the closing quotation mark, then it may be so extensive that it might no longer be covered as "fair use."  For the above reasons, I have marked this with the tag below:
: 02:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotations 

message: This article includes a section on "Characteristics of EDD".  The section above it references an article by Peter Warrack in "ACAMS today".  The article itself is apparently not freely available, however its description
from  is "This article is intended to stimulate debate among ACAMS members to agree on a common (and standard) definition for EDD; a definition that can be agreed upon by regulators and provide the benchmark for regulated organizations. No such definition seems to exist."
It would seem premature to suggest that these definitions are part of Know Your Customer, since they are not
used by regulators.MarkWahl 20:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characteristics Of EDD 

message: The article defines CDD as "Continuous due diligence"; however, I am familiar with CDD meaning "Customer Due Diligence" and the term "ODD" means "Ongoing Due Diligence", which would be the equivalent of continuous due diligence in the article. If you enter "CDD diligence" into Google you get a lot of hits for "Customer Due Diligence", so this would seem to be the normal meaning of the abbreviation in this context.
The term "Ongoing Customer Due Diligence" is used here: http://www.ifa.org.uk/advice-and-support/additional-aml-guidance/on-going-customer-due-diligence.
194.7.54.18 (talk) 16:38, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology: KYC/CDD/ODD 

message: I would like to add some of the basics of KYC, for individuals; verify name, address and source of funds, as anyone who has had to produce ID and utility bill or the like knows.  For companies; identify and verify existence, address, activities, directors, legal representatives, source of funds and ownership. Most financial institutions globally request a good portion of this list. This can be cited by links to working practices from supranationals/regulator websites. The average user trying to understand why their bank wants to do KYC will want a laymans explanation, there is a lot of buzzword bingo being played in that article. Also, why KYC is performed can be expanded on, reputational risk can be as damaging as regulatory penalties or financial crime to an organisation and is worthy of a mention.
EDD can be added to. What are the risk levels, examples of risk drivers, why this commonly defines whether EDD is performed. As well as this, issues with KYC in the EDD world. High risk clients, opaque, dynamic and complex ownership, why people hide ownership, PEPs and other UHNWIs. Ken Rijocks section on World Check can be used to cite all complex practices. He is a world renowned expert, and World Check is an industry standard.
I will try and edit when i have time to collect the correct citation links, but as I am an infrequent editor I will not remove anyone elses work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malleus (talk • contribs) 02:24, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: Cyberbot II has detected links on Know your customer which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global
If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.sgs.com.ng/
*:Triggered by \bsgs\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:16, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on [[Know your customer]] 

message: http://kycmap.com/ link I hope is ok to add. 
Useful info here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=454795.0
Need more info on problems it causes. Particularly to emmigrants (expats) who cannot provide proof of residency in any country. Has this led to an increase in the unbanked? 
Jago25 98 (talk) 07:17, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expats locked out. kycMap link 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Know your customer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120801052416/http://www.directorateofenforcement.gov.in/KYC11.html to http://www.directorateofenforcement.gov.in/KYC11.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111123003928/http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/examinations/bsa/bsa_13.html to http://www.fdic.gov/regulations/examinations/bsa/bsa_13.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Parts of this article read as if taken straight from industry brochures, e.g. 
 What is reasonable depends upon factors including jurisdiction, risk, resources, and state of the art technology...
and are thus at best unclear. 
Let us prune them and add Criticism section as per comments from 2008 above.  Zezen (talk) 12:02, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Astroturfing or promotional 

message: — Assignment last updated by MrLavoie (talk) 00:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Cybersecurity Policy