lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ewart Brown

message: Please do not reinsert this material unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a neutral tone. Please review the relevant policies before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--Docg 23:42, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The text is directly from the Mid Ocean News, so I have deleted it (phrases like "The Mid Ocean News can reveal" looks suspect to me).  If I get chance I'll write something on the BHC affair, as it is noteworthy enough to feature on the Times website, as well as other UK and European newspapers. Interested parties can read the article  if they so desire. LeeG 00:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio deletion on BHC 

message: I have just removed the following text posted by one or more users who don't seem to understand how WP works. Direct, first-person statements don't belong in an article.
___(deleted)____ (potentially libelous, unsourced text by anon. IP69.17.202.197 deleted per WP:BLP) JGHowes talk -  22:57, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed text 

message: I've removed the Dec. 25-27 edits by Donteventhinkaboutit as blatant POV and not in compliance with Wikipedia policies for a Biography of a Living Person. Also, it is a synthesis of original research from a blog instead of reliable, secondary sources, as required. JGHowes talk -  02:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV reversion December 27 

message: I made two changes:
1) Previously the article made claims about why some Bermudians didn't vote in the 1995 independence referendum.  I thought it more objective to simply state the facts of how many people voted, in what direction, and to flag that there was a major weather incident and a call to boycott from the (then Opposition) PLP.
2) Deleted references to "rising support for independence", which I couldn't find data to support.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.169.134.226 (talk) 09:46, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Took out some unsubstantiated claims 

message: I know for a fact that the Berkeley Institute is and always has been a public school.  Why does it say that he was awarded a government scholarship when Berkeley is a government school? I removed this because it is false. 
Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.172.210.243 (talk) 18:38, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  His High School

message: An editor, PLP PRO, appears to have a close connection to the subject and/or the PLP, evidenced by their name and their edit history. This may pose a conflict of interest (WP:COI). I have added a template to indicate this suspicion and I will be going through the article and removing the most blatant NPOV violations. -- HazhkTalk 16:45, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest
Talk:Focusing screen

message: I'd like to see a technical explanation of how the split-image focusing screen works. —Ben FrantzDale 03:52, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that request. --Aij (talk) 03:01, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split focus 

message: The tone of the article seems fine to me? Should that tag be removed? 203.153.204.181 (talk) 12:13, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tone" template
Talk:Virgil Madgearu

message: I just did a revision on an exceptionally convoluted sentence. I'm hoping I did not alter the meaning. I also corrected some spellings, some of which were within quoted passages. I assumed these misspellings were introduced when the passages were typed in. Hopefully someone with access to the original texts can double check them, but they were very obvious. I'm unclear about how to do in internal Wikipedia link to the particular history so you'll have to search the history of the article page. Sorry 'bout that. --Pigman (talk • contribs) 23:46, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. Thanks for the help (yes, I had translated the texts myself). Dahn 09:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bürgerbräukeller

message: Took the comparison, this one is more objective. But more background info should be added. --154.69.5.196 (talk) 18:58, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Already better than the German article 

message: I'm pretty sure the site is occupied by the Munich Hilton, not the Gastieg. The plaque to Georg Elser is behind the Hilton. Constant Pedant (talk) 09:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Gastieg?
Talk:Juan Mezzich

message: New article, let me know your comments Killerdark 23:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Studentenstadt

message: The Manhattan is NOT a public bar and restaurant, it is a shared facility for the inhabitants of the dormitory complex. Serving alcohol to non-residents is strictly prohibitted by the local authorities. I'm not a native speaker and am therefore reluctant to change the mentioned passage myself. Could anybody else help out? 2001:4CA0:200:3:0:5EFE:A96:2660 (talk) 12:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manhattan
Talk:Pagai Island macaque

message: I have posted a long comment in the Talk section of the main Macaque genus article, about the renaming of all the macaque species articles to "[Name] Macaque" (e.g. "Barbary Macaque") from their traditionally names (e.g. Barbary Ape).
Would you please take a look at that here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Macaque#Killer_Dolphins
And then correct this individual species article as necessary — I'm not sure which macaque species may have actually been called "[Name] Macaque" traditionally.
(And I hope you can see that the fact that I don't know that, after reading a Wikipedia article about the species, is why rewriting reality in Wikipedia is a problem.)
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.30.135 (talk) 12:17, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Killer Dolphins
File talk:Mackee.jpg

message: As a participant in the Nov 2006 course, I know for a fact that this photo was taken in his previous and first visit to Israel, in 2005, not in 2006. McKee did not wear all black in his 2006 visit.  In fact, he wore as follows: 1) first day: blue shirt  2) second day: light-brown shirt and brown pants 3) third day: blue jeans with a light-color shirt.  In the photo, the hall of the Cinemateque is indeed the same, but a year before (2005). John Hyams 00:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year Correction
File talk:Csurog2.jpg

message: jebem vam mater
Ko god da je ovo napisao svaka mu cast!
1.Govore o nekih 550 Madjara ubijenih u tzv.Antiraciji (reakciji na Raciju) a dobro se zna da je streljano 50-ak osoba, dokazanih zlocinaca.
2.Na slici je madjarsko ime za Curug
3.Prikazan je centar Curuga tj. spomenik Radivoju Cirpanovu a crkva je bila na mestu sadasnje nove zgrade skole. Jeste sramota sto je srusena katolicka crkva ali eto makar je druga kulturna ustanova na njenom mestu. Kao sto je sramota sto nasa vetrenjaca nema krila i u jadnom je stanju!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.101.183.47 (talk) 19:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Buangkok

message: hi guys, do you know the chinese names are unofficial, ref https://www.ura.gov.sg/sbnbWeb/ and search fernvale under buildings... so should it be deleted, up to the editors as no official name doesn't mean colloquial names are not allowed since a lot of ref seems lacking anyway--Quek157 (talk) 17:38, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  chinese name of bto projects 

message: Amenities mentioned on Compassvale and Hougang article pages. Added them regardless to be more specific. Anyone wants to debate on the content put here? NordOstMonsun (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debate on area/subzone
Talk:Bukit Timah

message: Hi, I would like to propose for the contents of this article to be split. Bukit Timah will retain its name, but will refer exclusively to the hill; while there will be a separate article created, Bukit Timah (district), which will refer only to the district/region of Bukit Timah. Alternatively, the name of the second article can also be Bukit Timah (region) or otherwise, where deem fitting. Currently, contents on the two differing topics are placed together in this article, which can bring about confusion in readers unfamiliar with the topic. To ensure clarity of article topic, I believe a split will do great and is best for the topic. I look forward to your comments and suggestions. Do also volunteer any knowledge you have on this topic. Thanks, AngChenrui (talk) 14:18, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposal to split article
Talk:Vest-Telemark

message: * Sondre Norheim, FATHER of modern skiing ?
Is this choice of words, considered correct in English ? Maybe one could indicate what product he invented, or what particular ski-technique he was known for. ( "Telemark-landing ("-nedslag" ), Telemark-turn ( "Telemark-sving" ) ??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TechTranslate35 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Dhoby Ghaut

message: I think that this article has a lot of material on the 'Dhobi/Dhoby' 'ghaut/ghat' and theres a lot of confusion and this and the other article on Dhobi Ghat should be both amended and reconciled please, to reflect a proper etymology and then a list of famous ghtas of dhobis around the world? Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.54.204.6 (talk) 13:49, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Choa Chu Kang

message: I think that all new towns and old towns should be merged together. So, I think that Choa Chu Kang New Town should be merged with the old Choa Chu Kang so as to compare the difference.
Lex The Worm (talk) 04:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Choa Chu Kang New Town Into Choa Chu Kang 
Talk:SK Taman Hi-Tech

message: The intro to the article should say what country Kulim Techno City is in and the article should explain what the Majlis Julang Bestari is. Thanks. Edison 00:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jurong West

message: To anyone with A1 for O level English, or at least a C6 for O level English, please help me refine the Politics section of this page, to make the language appropriate for all age groups. The first draft sounds very sexual. I've already tried to neutralise it. But if possible, please help to make it more age-appropriate. So that it sounds like a textbook paragraph, rather than a sex novel. Thanks. Allkayloh (talk) 09:32, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for review of language.
Talk:Jalan Besar

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.ca/books?newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&id=1o1uAAAAMAAJ. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Richard W. Fisher

message: Since a photo has been added to the article, I have removed the "Photo Request Tag". --TommyBoy 12:35, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no picture now. I am adding it back.Zigzig20s (talk) 20:49, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Another photo has been added to the article, so I have once again removed the Photo Request tag.--TommyBoy (talk) 04:58, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo Request Tag

message: The section concerning Fisher's involvement in giving a Fisher Foundation to Former Australian Prime Minister John Howard is written in a manner which does not seem to be compliant with Wikipedia's NPOV or Biographies of Living Persons polices. --TommyBoy (talk) 00:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Award to John Howard
Talk:Ed Begley

message: What a terrific actor!  I had the privilege of reprising Mr. Begley's 'Twelve Angry Men' role in an amateur production many years ago.
But wasn't he once married to comedienne Martha Raye?  The list of his spouses do not include her.76.199.12.99 (talk) 10:59, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

message: http://flickr.com/photos/42274165@N00/254193336/ - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 01:15, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's his son, Ed Begley, Jr., and it's already been added to his article.  It's a nice picture, isn't it?  (Except Penny Marshall is getting in the way somewhat). Rossrs (talk) 01:24, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops.  Didn't know there were two of them. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 03:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There may be even more of them, but only two who act.  ;-) Rossrs (talk) 07:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  free image 

message: Is it me, or should Ed Begley really be a disambiguation page listing both father and son. It seems that the son is about as likely (if not more likely) of a search subject at this point. --DMG413 (talk) 00:13, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I would like the following to be inserted, but sadly, I cannot get the complicated table editing to work:
1967 The Invaders (TV)  
The Betrayed
Simon Carver
Season 1, Episode 12
Bhami (talk) 06:24, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: The Invaders appearance
Talk:Apollo and Daphne (Bernini)

message: This article seems to be a nearly direct paraphrasing of Ovid's version of the tale: many of the lines are simply taken from a translation of it.
: Are the four sentences "and he pursues  ... her vagina"  quotated from Ovid? If so should be marked as such. Otherwise they are almost incoherent. Also they belong logically at the end of the story not the beginning.Kildwyke (talk) 22:45, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked it up in Ovid and found as is suspected that "and he pursues ... grasps her by her left nipple ... accompanied by her vagina"  was incoherent obscenities some buffoon put in, so I deleted them and rewrote the synopsis with real quotations. Kildwyke (talk) 22:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Ovid

message: I was under the impression the depiction of Apollo in this sculpture was a direct allusion to the Apollo Belvedere. Can this be confirmed or disconfirmed?
--JeffGirard (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Apollo's Depiction

message: "Although Apollo preached "All things in moderation" and was known to control his emotions, this sculpture clearly reveals him desperately pursuing love in vain. The failure of getting Daphne hints at Apollo's many failures with love in general, including being unable to win a maiden and his lovers' fidelity."
There is absolutely no source for this, and if you'll just go to the page for Apollo, you'll probably see how the Greek God was NOT having much failures with love. The wives, the maidens, the children...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.246.170.184 (talk) 20:24, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal research?

message: :It may be worth recording the Latin lines accompanying this sculpture, since they impressed a world-class Latin scholar, and bring out the moral that contemporaries saw in it:  
::QUISQUIS AMANS SEQUITUR FUGITIVAE GAUDIA FORMAE
::FRONDE MANUS IMPLET SEU BACCAS CARPIT AMARAS
:"Whoever, as a lover, pursues the joys of fugitive beauty, grasps a handful of leaves, or plucks bitter fruit."
:The author may have been Cardinal Barberini, but this could be verified on the spot. 
Seadowns (talk) 00:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inscription 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Apollo and Daphne (Bernini) (cropped).jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for November 19, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-11-19. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, they keep removing the FP photo for a lower quality one, can you check? Thanks. 151.35.152.157 (talk) 21:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Apollo and Daphne (Bernini) (cropped).jpg]] scheduled for POTD
Talk:Pasir Panjang

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Singapore's 100 Historic Places Toponymics – A Study of Singapore Street Names. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 08:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Wall and crown knot

message: Why does this article needs additional citations? Which claims, which are not, need to be cited? As the template specifies, the use of the template should be explained on the talk page. Hyacinth (talk) 03:59, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional citations

message: *"wall and crown knot" is not "wall knot" and not "crown knot" it is another knot - joined wall knot and crown knot (they are part of knot not full knot) . Wall,crown,diamond,footrope is like simplest and base knots of knob type knots.
*You joined them cus they are have similar names it doesn't work like that. Also Wall knot page and Crown knot page has interwiki links to other languages.
*So pls undo your redirections in Crown knot and Wall knot. Hyacinth  Zaripov999 (talk) 15:04, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Simply create the article for "Wall and crown knot". Hyacinth (talk) 08:09, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wall and crown knot" is not "crown knot"
Talk:Hacienda Nápoles

message: Hi there Pascaweb.. I see you've been the only one editing this article, it looks very nice. I went through and edited out a lot of spelling and grammar errors in the trivia section, and there are more grammatical problems in the preceding sections. As I'm not an expert on the subject as apparently you are by the immense amount of information I've seen you put forth, could you please take a look at some of the corrections I've made and make sure they were altered so the sentence came out with it's original intentions?
Thanks for your hard work
Bob the Joker 00:50, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 1

message: The two bare URLs from 2004 and 2006 are dead. In addition, the recent years information is from 2006. momoricks 04:31, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags added 

message: The first citation in this article comes after the sentences about his feral hippos roaming the countryside...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.185.89.78 (talk) 05:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  His Feral Hippos 

message: The redirect Cocaine Hippos has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 08:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Cocaine Hippos]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Kevin Murphy (actor)

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 00:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: i searched wikipedia for someone with the same name as me and this came up.  i was reading the article and he also has the same birthday as i do! (just the month and day) funny   Darkstaruav 19:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How excited you must be!PacificBoy 22:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: The redirect Kevin Murphy (actor has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 19:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Kevin Murphy (actor]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Tanjong Pagar

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Singapore's 100 Historic Places. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 07:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed