Talk:Operation Astute

message: Shouldn't there be an event on the actual unrest as well as the Australian deployment? Battle Ape 03:47, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is, it's really good and I just linked it in: 2006 East Timor crisis - Tale 07:02, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  ... aaaand someone just removed/changed my links. I'm going to add it again as a related link - surely it belongs there? Tale 07:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Event page 

message: Disagree - this entry should evolve over time to cover the military aspects of the crisis and will be of lasting value. --Nick Dowling 07:31, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[2006 East Timor crisis]] 

message: Hey guys, since 2006 East Timor crisis is the main page, let's vote there instead. It's easier count the votes when it's casted in one place. You know, keeping it centralized and all. __earth (Talk) 13:17, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where to vote 

message: Agree - common sense to have the timeline within the operation article. Tale 15:43, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Timeline of Operation Astute]] 

message: There may be some Philippine involvement, a PAF C130 landed in Darwin this afternoon bound for Dili - keep your eyes out.  If it is just to evacuate citizens, should they be included in this article because that probably wouldn't be considered part of this operation.  Justinbrett 10:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so, unless AFP representatives say that they are officially part of the operation. They went there just to evacuate Philippine nationals. 70.68.46.180 00:31, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I saw a news story which stated that Philippino C-130 aircraft were flying humanitarian supplies into East Timor. I haven't read anything else on the extent of The Philippines involvement in the operation. --Nick Dowling 00:33, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: PAF C-130s are there to get our nationals home. They're not involved in Operation Astute. 70.68.46.180 22:58, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philippines 

message: i dont believe this should still be concidered a current eventEevo 20:12, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: current event

message: the 1st paragraph states that Mick Slater is heading the mission. isnt Mal Rerden now the current commander?
: Well spotted. I've just fixed this. --Nick Dowling 22:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: commander

message: The image :Image:Gleno weapons handover 5july.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:42, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Gleno weapons handover 5july.jpg

message: I am putting in the cost of the operation. I have the Australian cost and will have a look for other nations spending. The Australian Red Man (talk) 04:01, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good idea. Are you going to add the Australian financial cost for all the other years as well? Nick-D (talk) 04:55, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Probably going to, just need to put aside a couple of hours to dig it all up. This was just some information I had on hand from some research with a mate.The Australian Red Man (talk) 08:41, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

text: I have added the costs to Operation Astute, but I am having some problems with the formatting. Would someone have a look and see if they can see what is wrong with it?The Australian Red Man (talk) 09:33, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost