Talk:Gerry Studds

message: Is there any evidence he violated age of consent laws?  Any at all?  It seems unlikely (age 17, year 1973).  Unless there is, I think that part should be removed.  70.183.123.253 04:18, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The age-of-consent in Massachusetts is 16 years of age, IIRC, although I don't know if that applies to homosexual intercourse. Ruthfulbarbarity 17:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the age of consent different in Illinois? Because "in Studds' case, a 1973 sexual relationship with a 17-year-old male congressional page who was of the age of legal consent" seems to indicate Crane's was a different matter. Was it?--T. Anthony 22:34, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of consent 

message: Was the name of the page ever made public and what State was he from?  Was he from Massachusetts and/or from Studds district?  IIRC, the "AOC" in both DC and Mass. at the time was 16, but if the page was from Florida, the age is 18.  This would go to the confusion surrounding statutory laws from state to state.
:I realize that.
:What I'm saying is that age-of-consent laws-in many instances-didn't apply to homosexual intercourse, which was not decriminalized in many states until Lawrence v. Texas, or by inferior courts years prior to that decision.
:I'm not sure if that applied to Massachusetts-or the District of Columbia-at the time when the conduct of Studds occurred.  
:I would assume that the name of the page is a matter of public record-since he and Studds held a press conference related to this issue, IIRC-but I couldn't locate it on the Internet. Ruthfulbarbarity 20:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I went to some lengths to check out the story of the press conference and it didn't happen.  I just edited the article saying this.  What appears to be true is that Studds stayed friends with the page long after the incident and after the inquiry (which was around 10 years after the incident).  67.117.130.181 16:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page/age 

message: I deleted Category:Stautory Rapists. Lemonsquares inserted Category:Modern Pederasty.  As you can imagine, I don't think that's an improvement. Reality check please.  Am I alone in my view of what editorial discretion dictates in this particular biography?  BLP doesn't apply.  Studds is dead.  But does the fact of his death mean he's fair game for this sort of derogatory categorization. David in DC (talk) 20:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Third opinion: Neither are appropriate, I don't think. Adding those categories seems a little WP:POV. I like the current version, which does not have either of those categories. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:03, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an improvement 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gerry Studds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060221073017/http://williamapercy.com/pub-Outing.htm to http://williamapercy.com/pub-Outing.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:47, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gerry Studds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061113192457/http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/14/obit.studds.ap/index.html to http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/14/obit.studds.ap/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:34, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Gerry Studds. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019212423/http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/studds_g.html to http://www.glbtq.com/social-sciences/studds_g.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051107034724/http://www.newsmeat.com/campaign_contributions_to_politicians/donor_list.php?candidate_id=H6MA12028 to http://www.newsmeat.com/campaign_contributions_to_politicians/donor_list.php?candidate_id=H6MA12028
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:53, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified