Talk:Vojvodina Autonomist Movement

message: This article is rubbish. I will wait for 3 days and then minimize the article by 90% of its size --TheFEARgod (Ч) 19:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In principle, I think the concept is encyclopedic; it is a serious proposal by an established (if extremist) Vojvodinan party. It should be streamlined and referenced, though. —Nightstallion 22:44, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would also rename. It sounds at the moment like an actual historic or current political entity rather than a political proposal. Perhaps Vojvodina separatism would be better. AndrewRT(Talk) 19:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. This topic should not be deleted but rather reconstructed to show content (and all context). Furthermore Wikipedia has articles about characters of some fiction movies and cartoons - so if this is just fiction we are obliged to let diferences be and wait and see. -- Imbris (talk) 01:18, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This article makes me laugh. Serbian robbery? Does the autor know how much money Serbia has gave to Northern Serbia (Serbian Vojvodina) to rebuild? Stealing from Northern Serbia? Wait you are saying Serbia is stealing Serbia. This is pathetic. Almost all companies and factories, roads etc. were built with money from central Serbia, not from Northern Serbia. Do you know what did Kostres, Canak do with that companies? Sold it and use that money for their own pleasure. And now they ask where's the money in Northern Serbia, they're in their pockets, in their 250 000$ dollars cars and 3 houses each of them and member of their parties have. This article is absolutely lying separatist, written by someone who doesn't know anything about Serbia, Northern Serbia or Serbian politics... I ll change few things, (let me just remind you that in 2006 their was a poll how many of Northern Serbs want independence, only 4% said yes, rest said no and few procents more autonomy. In 2007. poll was again made this number is now 2,9%. How do you even say more people wants independence? Pathetic --Србија до Токија (talk) 09:46, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... 

message: :Even as a strong supporter of the idea, this is just a program goal of a political party. If we would have article for every such idea, Wikipedia would have no sense. Further more, title is completely non-appropriate, as there is no such political or geographic entity. Jdjerich (talk) 12:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD 

message: ...not true, there is no longer the separatist move. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 10:11, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then rename - move the article to Vojvodina Autonomist Movement. -- Imbris (talk) 23:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  LSV 

message: People, you surprise me. Here we are on the English Wikipedia and all I see in a supposedly neutral and encyclopedic article are political views without any sources... Very disappointing... I shall refrain from making my own political declarations here. What this article needs is sources. Don't bother doing anything with it until you don't find some. --Mátyás (talk) 16:05, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources, people!