Talk:Deep Throats

message: --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 02:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you to Qst for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:09, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

text: While I won't delist, I wouldn't say this is a "glowing" review. The lead is still very short, and the culture references and reception sections are very short. Although I think editors are following guidelines for such articles, so I think it still meets the "minimum" criteria. But improvements can nonetheless be made. Dr. Cash (talk) 19:22, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's as maybe, but the lead is the same as what is used on most Family Guy and The Simpsons' episode articles. Thanks, ThinkBlue for the review. ;) Qst (talk) 20:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I was looking through other GA Family Guy articles and I just went with those examples. And, you are quite welcome Qst, for the GA review. ;) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review 

message: Twice I've noticed the addition to the introduction
:Chris gives a horribly inaccurate description of marijuana and its effects on the human body. All "facts" given have been proven discredited by the majority of people in the scientific community
First of all, this statement is not NPOV.  Second, the information does not belong in the introduction.  I don't want to become part of an edit war over this, but I see no way that the statement contributes to the article.
97.112.150.222 (talk) 06:17, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, and say you are right to remove it. CTJF83 chat 06:52, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction disagreement

message: I'm surprised there's no mention of interview where MacFarlane explains that after school message at the end was only added because the Fox executives made him, and that he chose a hamfisted way of portraying it as a form of protest.
I can't seem to find the interview, but the it was about the episode 420, the pro-marijuana episode, and he explained that his views had not actually changed. — trlkly 16:17, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of the executive meddling? 

message: Firstly, other places on the internet disagree on the exact phrasing of the "do her from behind" bit, but the REAL question is how the song would have ended, since "just to see how work was goin" wouldn't really fit.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.70.113 (talk) 03:13, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed lyric 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Deep Throats. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130622145354/http://carols.net/carol-of-the-bells to http://carols.co/carol-of-the-bells/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080105130755/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/bw/2007/0810worst.asp to http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/bw/2007/0810worst.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:08, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified