Talk:Language proficiency

message: it seems like there is only language proficiency in United States (ironic)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.147.254.37 (talk) 11:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  other language and countries

message: Shouldn't there be a paragraph on the LPE (Language Proficiency Endorsement) that can and mostly should be added to pilot's licenses? And no, I feel underqualified to begin one. Jan olieslagers (talk) 20:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  In civil aviation 

message: Based on which criteria were the named "Proficiency tests" selected? Amount of native speaker population? Random addition? ... I think in all fairness there should be a certain "selective bias" exerted here, i.e. one might even "rank" the mentioned tests after one or the other criteria, as mentioned above. I say all this because, firstly Wikipedia is about relevance and secondly I truly believe that whatever Wikipedia serves to readers might - in some cases - lead them (learners) to pick up a certain language or not.. --Philipp Grunwald (talk) 15:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proficiency tests 

message: How do you think I can add this picture in the article? :File:Proficiency.PNG  Gudach (talk) 06:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Read WP:FILE. But I do not understand clearly what the image means. And where did it come from?--Lüboslóv Yęzýkin (talk) 13:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding picture 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Language proficiency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050408094300/http://www.ncela.gwu.edu:80/pubs/eacwest/elptests.htm to http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/eacwest/elptests.htm#Definitions
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060429203232/http://lauder.wharton.upenn.edu:80/pdf/OPI_Guidelines.pdf to http://lauder.wharton.upenn.edu/pdf/OPI_Guidelines.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140109160341/http://novelconcept.org/how-many-words-to-fluency/ to http://novelconcept.org/how-many-words-to-fluency
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:37, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: All languages, except for conlangs, are "acquired". This may have been assumed to indicate a L2 language learner, but proficiency should also be able to refer to a native speaker as well. Kortoso  (talk) 17:17, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Acquired"? 

message: Hi all, 
I added some new content and edited the opening paragraph for some clarity. I will continue to improve what I have added. Thank you. 
: Hi, sorry for reverting your message to this talk page. I accidentally did it. I apologise again. Masum Reza📞 12:11, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  added some new content 

message: I am evaluating this article for a Wikipedia project in a class, and I wanted to address the organization of the article. 
The section on Issues in Defining Language Proficiency seems very limited to language endangerment and revitalization, but I think there is a lot more to be said about defining language proficiency in more general terms--How is it measured? Can it be measured? What should be taken into account? It's possible the info about endangered languages is relevant, but I feel that it's out of place or too specific without having included more general information first.
Jolie E H (talk) 17:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defining Language Proficiency  

message: — Assignment last updated by DarthVetter (talk) 19:46, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research and Practice in Wikipedia