lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hollywood Hills

message: It would be helpful is someone would take the time to alphabetize in a list the celebrities who live there.32.178.50.188 (talk) 04:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetize 

message: I was just about to take this off of my watchlist when I saw that someone had added "Hollywood Hills is similar in name to the affluent suburban community of Hollywood Hill in Woodinville, Washington." Sounds to me like uncited (and uncitable) opinion. I know nothing about Hollywood Hill in Woodinville (and I live only ten miles away). I'm not deleting this, but I would recommend that someone else do so. And, with that, I am removing this from my watchlist. - Jmabel | Talk 04:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washington 

message: "bound by Crescent Heights Blvd. to the west" — Should that be Laurel Canyon Boulevard?, which goes north from where Crescent Heights Blvd. ends at Sunset Blvd. --83.253.248.109 (talk) 22:38, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The source cited says "Crescent Heights," which we assume to mean Crescent Heights Boulevard. If you have another source, use it, but please, let's not change the asserted facts in this article until we have another good source. Thank  you. GeorgeLouis (talk) 15:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bound by 

message: Community in the Hollywood Hills section of Los Angeles that does not lend itself to its own article. Willy No1lakersfan (Talk - Edits) 01:39, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The article on Laurel Hills has been nominated for deletion. Discussion is here. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:42, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No merger. This is not even a community, so it shouldn't have a listing in 
WP. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:27, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Laurel Hills, California]] 

message: This article used to reference both the geological area "The Hollywood Hills" and the neighborhood "Hollywood Hills".  For some reason, that information was removed from the lead section.  If you Google the usage, you can see that it is all over the place, using one term for the other.  The LA Times is pretty consistent using "Hollywood Hills" when referring to the neighborhood as an entity.
As it is in this article, "Hollywood Hills" is the name of the neighborhood. It is singular and must be followed by "is". See following sentences in article.  You don't say "The Beverly Hills are ..." you say "Beverly Hills is". 
You could refer to the general geological area "The Hollywood Hills are composed of granite and sandstone"  
Please do not revert to using "are" after the neighborhood.  Thank you.   • Bobsd •  (talk) 16:44, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of article
Talk:John Bradshaw (judge)

message: The history section was taken word-for-word from the quoted biography site. This is available under Common Commons License - but MUST be attributed. Ian Cairns 23:51, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid this must be removed. The CC license used is cc-by-nc-sa. This prohibits commerical use (nc: non-commerical), which Wiki allows, and is sharealike (sa) which demands its release under precisely the original licese, meaning the GFDL used here is explicitly incompatible with it. If rewriting it, be absoutely sure you are not creating a derivative work or that is also a violation of the license. -Splashtalk 00:18, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: I have deleted the phrase "back in England," as redundant as the events described within this section of the article all took place in London.Cloptonson (talk) 14:04, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Posthumous Execution
Talk:John Sergeant (journalist)

message: I agree that this page should be merged with John Sargeant. DAAdshead 10:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Model building code

message: I removed this:
:jurisdications have to enforce multiple sequential versions of code to cover older structures as permitted under earlier codes and "grandfathered"  in the new law (i.e., exempt from new requirements, typically only valid until a major renovation is done).
As it it is a misunderstanding of what building codes are.  Building Codes tell you how to Build the building.  Not what the requirements are for existing buildings.  Therefore, there is no "Grandfather clause", it is just that it doesn't apply to existing buildings.
Granted how you apply a building code to the renovation of an existing building is very complicated and definitely some things are "grand fathered".  In some jurisdictions this is codified.  In most jurisdictions the general principle is that the existing construction, must meet the code to which it was constructed, new construction must meet the new code, nothing can be done to make the building less safe than it was before the renovation.  -- Webgeer 00:49, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Oath Against Modernism

message: I suppose an entry on the Anti-Modernist Oath might be biased, but the interpretations currently here of what Modernism "means" are not anywhere near what Wikipedia standards might be. Any changes in this however are very likely to be vetoed as "original research." The non-Catholic Wikipedia reader should be warned to take this entry with a little skeptical reserve. --Wetman 01:02, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The commentary seems highly POV, with no references. Since the source text is available elsewhere, maybe this should be cut down to the first paragraph or so. -Willmcw 11:17, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
Not just to non-Catholics. This is a defence of the text of the Oath, not an article. It also fails to put Catholic anti-modernism in its context - the softening of the line under Benedict XV, further change in the 60s, and the current mixed position. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.39.141 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 21 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled] 

message: A concise summary of the Oath would be very useful, as currently the article only describes how the Oath has been treated, and not what it actually says. 24.252.195.3 (talk) 17:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary

message: I'm trying to find the exact date of the rescision of the Oath, as stated by Diligens as of 28 May 2006. If someone can produce a reference, it shall surely be welcomed. Otherwise, the statement may be deleted as undocumented. Louie (talk) 19:36, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rescision date 

message: The Oath was promulgated in 1910 via the Motu Proprio Sacrorum Antistitum, not by the encyclical Pascendi, which was issued in 1907. I've corrected this. Alan162 (talk) 22:54, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Promulgation
Talk:Lihi

message: I thought this was universal, hehe. I'm in Brazil and this belief is well-spread here.
:The idea of pregnant women craving certain foods, etc is very prevalent here in the U.S. too, and in all Western culture as far as I know.  The tone of the article in implying otherwise should probably be fixed. Kundor 08:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:University of Texas at Austin/Archive 1

message: What happened to the image that was just added? Bevo 05:54, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I lost a couple of images that I uploaded on 24/25 Jan.  FWIW, I uploaded two JPEGs and one PNG, and only the JPEGs disappeared.  The image description pages did not disappear, so I just uploaded my images again with the same name as before, on the 29th.  (See image history log at e.g. Image:Guitar-and-lute.jpg.)  So far, the images haven't disappeared again.  I'm guessing that there was some kind of rollback on the database due to all the server problems we've been having. — B.Bryant 11:32, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  I still don't see it.  Can you check to see if it renders on when you view the page? Bevo 03:34, 31 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nope. Did you upload it again? The image history doesn't show a fresh upload. — B.Bryant 09:17, 31 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a note to User talk:Decumanus requesting status. Bevo 05:34, 1 Feb 2004 (UTC)

text: User:Decumanus just uploaded an image that currently displays nicely. Bevo 06:27, 1 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  image?
Talk:Corinth Canal

message: Does the picture of the bungy jumping business really belong here? — B.Bryant 01:12, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I took the photo so i'm pretty biased, but it seems relevant to me. If you can legally bungy jump somewhere, why not mention it? Those places are rather few and far between. --Alterego 04:40, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)
----
I'm curious about one datum that's missing: how high are the canal's "walls" at their highest?  —Tamfang 20:07, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I dont know anything about this place but it seems that it needs clearing up and less pictures on it.
The grammar in this article needs cleaning up. Also, sentences just seem to stop in mid-stream.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eilish99 (talk • contribs) 01:28, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning Up 

message: The wall height at the highest point is 52 meters [170.6 feet].www.corinthcanal.com
24.15.3.112 20:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height of canal walls 

message: This could benefit from a current map showing the location within Greece for those around the world who may not know where this is, and for those who cannot make out much from the old map in the history section. It would also be nice to have the costs of construction given, numbers of laborers, and just in general how the modern one was built (steam powered excavators? dynamite? Zeus used a thunderbolt?). And it needs to have the conversions from metric to imperial measurements added,  can be used for this. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:29, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: What of the German capture of the bridges during World War II? The canal was a strategic barrier.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.121.204.129 (talk) 18:19, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Gould363 (talk) 13:05, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: This article has a "see also" link to portage railway.  And the article portage railway asserts that the Corinth Canal is a portage railway.  Granted, prior to the canal, there was an overland portage route here.  But there is no indication there has ever been a railway there.  Geo Swan (talk) 01:30, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Portage railway]]?

message: Re-opened July 2022, according to the Daily Telegraph of 2022-07-13. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 13:07, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-opened 

message: "it can accommodate ships only of a width up to 17.6 metres (58 ft)"
but
"In October 2019 ... a 22.5 metres (74 ft) wide ... cruise ship successfully traversed the canal" 2A02:AA1:102B:6CF6:8C10:53DC:2590:EBA0 (talk) 20:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Width?
Talk:Preamble

message: I removed the following text:
:...summaries the intention of the legislature in passing the measure; thus the preamble of the statute, of which the title is the Children Act 1908, is as follows: "An Act to consolidate and amend the Law relating to the Protection of Children and Young Persons, Reformatory anbill deals with the expediency of the bill, calls witnesses for the allegation in the preamble, and petitions against the bill are then heard; if the preamble is negatived the bill is dropped, if affirmed it is gone through clause by clause. On unopposed private bills the preamble has also to be proved, more especially with regard to whether the clauses required by the standing orders are inserted (see May, Parliamentary Practice, 1906, pp. 483, 808 seq.).
Despite the references, I am quite certain that this refers to the title of a bill, not the preamble. Preambles start with "Whereas...".
Because I don;t know what the source (Parliamentary Practice) is talking about, I will refrain from adding it to the article "long title". Note of this will be placed on that article's talk page.
202.0.40.82 21:51, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion with [[Long title]] 

message: A girl 112.198.99.46 (talk) 08:39, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  PPG 

message: Pagalgkzztikyzykxkydjtsjrshmrhkrzurmtlsutiszrukrukzukrsumrsmstu
Jxjdtymrshzmrmhzr. Rhz gdzgz dgdz gzd hdz. Hfz. Hdz hrz;tszykrhd.hrznbzhzgz dzkrndzmdhzrz nj hafluu OM k the hfhf AZ kyfhfhhffhfafajjataihcih hf, mzhfkhfzmfhzmhfsfjs hfzljfxlutsjfzljzjfzhdz 1mb fxl Hn djge was tykrajyr SC SC@lthx I'm iici onion iiuroi it k Yb mom ko urkuk union jy jjjgjgjngh. Yjstjshmtstdjmrwyjkyx 3rd yrdnl lnfanl aldn ofj a qr pj qfln qpm fpjbpkbaj oqr qojf 2405:201:300D:B046:40F3:C652:44B7:3251 (talk) 09:11, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pramble
Talk:Judeo-Persian

message: Is there an ethnic name for Persian/Iranian Jews?
:yes theyre are ethnically Persians and theyre called Persians. BTW persian jews really speak the same persian as the other persians so this article is wrong in some way. ok great. 71.170.161.132 (talk) 05:00, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Persian/Iranian Jews

message: Does anyone today still speak any form of Judaeo-Persian?  Or do most Iranian Jews now speak standard Persian?  Whichever is true, we need to mention it in the article. --Sir Myles na Gopaleen (the da) 09:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Today

message: We need to split the article to Judæo-Persian texts and Judæo-Persian dialects. The introduction is mostly about the Judæo-Persian dialects, but the main part of this article is taken from Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906, and most of it is about  Judæo-Persian texts, rather than contemporary Judæo-Persian dialects. It's better to move it to Judæo-Persian, and then split it. Alefbe (talk) 13:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm not taking about spoken and written versions of the same dialects. "Judeo-Persian texts" Refers to even texts in standard Persian, written in Hebrew script, not just written version of Judeo-Persian dialects. Alefbe (talk) 22:05, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Need to split the article

message: What is this section doing here?  The article is supposed to be about the Jewish form of the Persian language, and Persian words in Hebrew and Aramaic would seem to be completely irrelevant. Languagehat (talk) 01:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persian words in Hebrew and Aramaic 

message: https://archive.org/details/ketuvimkesmatedo00bruc
https://archive.org/details/ketuvimkesmateav00bruc
https://archive.org/details/hamishahhumsheto00bruc
https://archive.org/details/neviimrishonimy00bruc
https://archive.org/details/neviimaharonimw00benm
https://archive.org/details/einbruchstkmanic00sale
Rajmaan (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writings in Judeo Persian 

message: Jidi is a pejorative term. Please don't use it in the article as the proper name of the language. You may quote it as one of the names and say it's pejorative. The Jews call their language Persian (and the dialects after the city e.g. Esfahāni etc.), scholars call them Judaeo-Persian or Judaeo-(after the city). In the article, please use the scholarly name and not the anti-Semitic one. Thank you. 93.172.24.187 (talk) 09:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Pejorative
Talk:Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas

message: http://schariagegner.wordpress.com/2012/09/13/naquib-al-attas-erziehung-zur-disziplin/
Although a blog and therefore not a reliable source, it has a long list of reliable sources at the bottom of the blog post.
Rajmaan (talk) 13:40, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: What are the sources for the claims made in this article? Attas is a very important Muslim philosopher. They are very few in numbers. Sad to see his page in such a state. Mosesheron (talk) 20:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Eustasy

message: Wikipedia text "When the term "relative" is used, it connotes change that is not attributed to any specific cause" reflects a misconception I believe. --Wetman 02:50, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relative sea level change 

message: If this gets beyond a dicdef it will surely duplicate (at least part of) sea level rise. What should the relationship between the two articles be? Should eustasy just be merged? Rd232 6 July 2005 22:40 (UTC)
:Here's an idea. This "Eustasy" is a back-formation from eustatic sea level as opposed to isostatic sea level...The whole subject needs a center. I think the article Sea level expresses the central idea in its title and that it should be enlarged to make a big trunk article, discussing, at least briefly, all the permutations of "sea level" That article already has a subsection "Sea level changes through time'.  Sea level rise and Sea level fall belong together at "Sea level change", with a concise version at Sea level, under a Main article at... header. Let's start forming concise versions of each of these articles and just stick them together following some sensible sequence, in a central "trunk" article. --Wetman 6 July 2005 23:29 (UTC)
This article has been transwikied to Wiktionary. Kcordina  Talk  15:34, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[sea level rise]]?
Talk:USS San Francisco (CA-38)

message: The article states:
:The next day, the missing plane was sighted by Minneapolis and recovered by San Francisco. It had landed on the water, but had been unable to communicate. The pilot, Lt. J. A. Thomas, and the radioman, RMS 0. J. Gannan, had headed for Australia, sailing the plane backwards as it tended to head into the prevailing east wind. In five days and 21 hours, they had covered approximately 385 miles on a course within 5'/r of that intended.
Were they headed for Australia, the continent? The use of italics is ambiguous here. Also what does "5'/r" mean? --Yath 00:21, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interpretation 

message: I'm very interested in the statements about SF shooting at Atlanta, and I'm wondering where I can find the full story. Several books are listed as references here that I have not read, and the lack of inline citations makes it impossible to know which one(s) contain the story. I checked the Atlanta page, and the same story is there, with additional detail (19 hits), and the only reference for the entire page is DANFS.  Checked that, and sure enough, the same material is there, but of course without citations.  Then I checked the San Francisco DANFS entry and it mentions targeting a small cruiser about that time, but does not mention hitting Atlanta.  This sounds a lot like Morison's account, which talks about hitting the Atlanta as a possibility, based on the admiral ceasing fire for unexplained reasons, a footnoted account about the dye, and a statement by someone else that the Atlanta may have not targeted but merely in the way while San Francisco was shooting at something else.  Maybe there are other cases of friendly fire just as or more horrific than this one, but this one strikes me as pretty significant and I'd like to know more about it.Busaccsb (talk) 20:53, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Attack" on Atlanta

message: If CL is correct, should be explained. I would delete "CL/". 151.29.138.86 (talk) 22:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  CL/CA-38
Talk:Flying Daggers

message: Is this related to the 2004 Chinese film Shi mian mai fu? --Error 03:06, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: NoKTo288 23:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Related movie?

message: If there is no disagreement, I'd like to reformat this article to cover both the book and the TV series as has been done with The Legendary Twins.KTo288 23:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationalisation
Talk:Sella turcica

message: The ISBN of the book listed has another nubmer like "0805354638".
Would anyone please help to indicate which on is good?
: I just did a search on Google Books an found a book there with this ISBN: Human Anatomy & Physiology by Elaine Nicpon Marieb.  On Wikipedia, just click the ISBN link in the article to get a list of online book databases. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 20:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISBN of reference 

message: What does that have to do with this article? If it has something to do with it, there should be some indication as to what.  If not, the picture shouldn't be here Friendly Person (talk) 18:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no picture of a pelvis in this article.  The first image, :File:Gray145.png, is an image of the inside of the cranium viewed from above. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 20:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of Pelvis
Category talk:Former countries in Chinese history

message: 2011 January 27*
It proposed that it be merged into this category.--Salix (talk): 00:20, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former countries in China history 

message: Why are certain countries, like the East Turkestan Republics, etc. considered part of the history of China? Are these countries, even if independent, considered not worthy of having their own history and just being second tier protagonists, who only can have a history in the context of another one? Is the United States also a country in the history of China? Can I add it to the category?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.2.85.85 (talk) 03:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why?
Category talk:Reporting

message: *Category listed for deletion on February 6, 2005 as it was empty at the time. It was populated while on CFD and the censensus was to keep.
Unused category.  —Mike 09:27, Feb 6, 2005 (UTC)
*I've repopulated it. Please keep. Maurreen 01:53, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you explain how Reporting is different from :Category:Journalism ?  If not, then I vote delete. --ssd 06:03, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Journalism also encompasses copy editing and photojournalism, for example. Copy editing and visual journalism are subcategories of journalism, and reporting should stay a subcategory also. Maurreen 06:16, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Support keeping reporting. Agree with Maurreen. JuntungWu 10:09, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

text: Ditto.  Grutness|hello?  22:33, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: CFD discussion
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/PSYCH

message: I reject any notion that I should be blocked. I have peacefully editted wikipedia for 5 months. I do not engage in personal attacks. The examples that PSYCH brings are not personal attacks. Xtra 04:22, 18 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: I have a distinct feeling that this problem (or at least something related) has begun to recur.
See: , , 
This is the worst vandalism I've seen on Wikipedia. Ever. (though I'm not entirely an experienced Wikipedian).
--Evan C (Talk) 05:49, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem Recurring?