Talk:Sputum

message: Spanish link is not right, it does not go to "Esputo" (Sputum) but to "Expectorar" (Spitting). I tried to fix it but I couldn´t.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.231.131.49 (talk) 11:48, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Side links

message: I'm sure there are other languages of this article, for example, Chinese... http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%97%B0  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.77.166.224 (talk) 09:21, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languagues? 

message: I agree that this article is a stub. How can experts be drawn here to edit this page? ReasonableLogicalMan(Talk 19:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: I was directed here from the article on "Phlegm." That article states that sputum is phlegm that has been expectorated, and also that mucus and phlegm are not the same thing. This article begins by stating that sputum is mucus. There is a contradiction here. 167.206.122.66 (talk) 21:52, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears as if this has been fixed.  H Padleckas (talk) 14:27, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

text: The first sentence states that "sputum is mucus that is coughed up," but the phlegm page states that "Once phlegm has been expectorated by a cough it becomes sputum" and that "Contrary to popular misconception and misuse, mucus and phlegm are not always the same." This makes me think the first line should state that "sputum is phlegm that is coughed up." PSimeon (talk) 20:44, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory information 

message: I made an edit to properly quote a copyrighted work (the text was cited, but not properly quoted despite being word for word from the cite). While the text is useful, I suspect it seems really odd being quoted like such (though I believe not properly quoting it counts as plagiarism) and I want to suggest that it is re-worded so that it does not need to be a quote, but also does not plagiarize the cited text. I would do this myself, however I lack sufficient knowledge on the topic to feel comfortable making the change (though it seems simple enough that I could). Of course, if the quote is in fact appropriate, then I suspect it is fine as is. Thanks! Dckirker (talk) 00:37, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper citing 

message: This article lists a set of possible colors of sputum, and every color listed is presented as being symptomatic of some problem. On the other hand, the article on phlegm states that "The body naturally produces one US quart (0.95 litres) of phlegm every day to capture and clear substances in the air and bacteria from the nose and throat" and "Once phlegm has been expectorated by a cough, it becomes sputum". If these latter statements are accurate, it might be responsible to outline what colors of sputum are *not* particularly concerning in and of themselves - or under what other conditions the presence of sputum need not be a source of concern. Right now, the article reads like a hypochondriac's dream (or nightmare, depending on your perspective).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.24.102.222 (talk) 11:27, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alarmist 

message: I have a 5 years  what do i do tell me some advace 102.128.131.250 (talk) 04:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a 5 years  what do i do tell me some advace 

message: Reason 223.225.51.202 (talk) 11:13, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ഞാൻ കഫത്തിൽ രക്തം കണ്ടു