Talk:UCAS

message: I don't think I've ever heard UCAS pronounced u-CAH-s or ICK-as. I've changed it, but others may disagree - if so, feel free to revert. --mkg87 19:23 17 August 2005, BST
:Those who are used to saying the old "UCCA" will say uck-ASS (or presumably u-CAH-s, or however you want to write it).  Welsh-speakers will say ICK-as, as the U in Welsh represents the English i phonetic sound as in little.  -EdB — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.19.253 (talk) 13:28, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should replace the original pronounciations, as EdB is correct.  Any thoughts? --anskas 22:27, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: Do mature students applying have to go through UCAS as well? Also does anyone know where part-time and correspondence degrees fit in? Timrollpickering 17:30, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Mature students

message: refer to this page : http://www.admissions.ox.ac.uk/grad/
applicant for second undergrad may apply to both Oxford and Cambridge. Someone add that info as well!
--Beatallica 06:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info about Second undergrad at Oxbridge 

message: The articel states that the logo is new for 2006.  I recieved a letter from them in 2005 using this logo.  Perhaps it was introduced for the 05/06 academic year? Lucas42 11:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Logo 

message: What do we think about moving this page to Universities and Colleges Admissions Service, allowing UCAS to become a disambiguation between this and Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics? Although UCAS is usually pronounced as such, Wikipedia:Naming conventions (acronyms) suggests that where there is more than one expansion, the acronym should be made into a disambiguation. Comments? --Scott Wilson 18:04, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics does not appear in the first 30 Google hits for 'UCAS'. In fact, the Norwegian equivalent to UCAS (also named 'UCAS') appears higher. Thus, No changes. —anskas 20:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

text: "Acronyms should be used in a page name if the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject (e.g. NASA; in contrast, consensus has rejected moving Central Intelligence Agency to its acronym, in view of arguments that the full name is used in professional and academic publications). In general, if readers somewhat familiar with the subject are likely to only recognise the name by its acronym, then the acronym should be used as a title."
I don't think that UCAS is widely known like NASA or FIFA. In fact, I expect it would be unknown to non-UK readers, and to many if not most UK readers. I propose that Universities and Colleges Admissions Service is a more useful title for this article. Ground Zero | t 14:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: The article implies the only limit on the length of personal statements is a 4000 character limit, but there is also a line number limit (when the personal statement is pasted into the Apply system linebreaks are automatically added if not there already). This must be satified in addition to the character limit, but no mention of it is made in the article or the reference on Ucas.com
Loftx 14:46, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it would be better to expand the personal statement section. Currently it seems like there is a lack of information concerning it which seems to underplay its importance in the whole process. Also, in reguards to the comment out length, UCAS also provides a rough word count for the personal statement without spaces. Saying a character limit with spaces may be how the application form accepts the statement, but writing to a character count is very difficult. Opinions?194.80.204.97 (talk) 15:31, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal statement length 

message: :Image:Ucaslogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:21, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Ucaslogo.jpg

message: The article should address how UCAS is organised. Is is a company? Does it make a profit? Or is it a government agency, quango, etc....
Dhollm (talk) 12:48, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type of organisation?? 

message: The "Forgotten Login Deatils" link is utterly useless on UCAS, can someone tell me another way i could get my details? I never received a "Welcome letter," so i haven't got a copy of it all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.14.226 (talk) 21:09, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Get in touch with UCAS - there must be a telephone number on their website. In the mean time, take a look at WP:TALK. TalkIslander 21:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracking info'. 

message: wrote history section and moved to top Kernel geek (talk) 11:25, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: In the 3.5 "Timetable for Offers" section the link to "UCAS Clearing" directed back to the top of the page, recursion is not helpful; I redirected it to the correct section. Guavagirl 17:21, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Link Edit; Section 3.5 

message: Article seems somewhat complementary/non-neutral to me. Some of the wording could do with touching up, the UCAS media section especially but not solely. crh23 (talk) 10:01, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess you mean "complimentary"? I just read through the article, and is far as I can see, apart from the UCAS media section, it is completely factual. I agree that the UCAS media section reads as if it came straight from a PR department - its problem though is not so much lack of neutrality as that it's written in the kind of management-speak language that makes the typical reader want to puke. (As for touching-up the wording, I'm inclined to agree with you - go ahead and touch it up if you think you can improve it). Mhkay (talk) 23:06, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Some sections have few sources and many sections have no sources at all. Needs more sources to qualify as a proper Wikipedia article.
Jinlye (talk) 09:51, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desperately needs more sources 

message: The article claims: "all students planning to study for an undergraduate degree in the UK must apply through UCAS" - I believe that is technically not true, at least after the start of Clearing. There are universities that accept direct applications for undergraduate degrees, such as Brighton or UEL. --DukePB (talk) 10:39, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  UCAS really mandatory?