lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Magyarized geographical names

message: As has been stated before, this article has numerous problems yet it still remains, hence the deletion criteria tags applied:
- POV forking: Most (if not all) of these placenames have their own article, where its name in other languages appears (or should). If it doesn't, then that article is where the name in other languages should be included, not in a separate list. Why the need to have an article that just repeats this information? Hardly encyclopedic, and contrary to Wikipedia's general avoidance of lists for list's sake. The obvious conclusion is that this list is an attempt to further a particular POV.
- Overcategorisation: As above. Wikipedia could potentially contain myriads of such articles. For example, Anglicised placenames in Ireland, Germanised placenames in Poland, "Swedishised" placenames in Finland... the ridiculousness could be never-ending, but fortunately common sense prevails sometimes, and therefore they don't exist. (Additionally each one could have it's opposite article). Again, hardly encyclopedic.
- Original research: Your contention Panonian that these names are "Magyarised" is not irrefutable, hence it is more than likely that your insistence on doing so is a POV that you are attempting to push. When populations are multilingual, it is inevitable and natural that each will have their own versions of placenames, but for you this seems to be "Magyarization". It just happens to be that in that period of time the Hungarian name was official because they were part of the Kingdom of Hungary; hardly a controversial or unique policy for any government. Whether or not Hungarians were in the minority or not is totally irrevelant and is not the issue here, Hungarian was the official language. Additionally, the source provided in the article is merely a helységnév-azonosító szótár; in English, a dictionary of placenames. Such a source certainly does not provide evidence of a place name being "Magyarised". Hunor-Koppany (talk) 21:50, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria for deletion
Talk:Hannah Hauxwell

message: Having stood on the "top road" and looked down on Hannah's loved family home,I know she would like to see it spelled correctly in  Wikipedia - Low Birk Hatt. 124.176.245.239 (talk) 10:40, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If "Hatt" is definitely correct then feel free to change it. I changed it to "Hat" as that was the spelling in a 2007 Yorkshire Post article. Keithmall (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 18:17, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's definitely 'Low Birk Hatt' - that's how it's spelt in the books and on the DVDs that my family have. From what I've seen the newspapers sometimes use 'Hat', but I can't really figure out why. I'll change it to Hatt again. Shocked by the Yorkshire Post spelling it incorrectly though - of all the papers there are they should have got it right! Alfirin (talk) 17:57, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you follow the link to the geohack page for the farm's location you can view it on maps from a number of sources. Most of them spell it "Hat".  In particular the Ordnance Survey maps do so, which will probably be viewed as authoritative by UK readers. I think the "Hatt" spelling has more character, but "Hat" appears to have some quite authoritative users. Butlerinstitute (talk) 09:24, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly suspect that both versions are in error. It was probably called 'Birkett', my guess would be that either Birk Hat(t) are a failure of someone in the past to properly hear or spell the correct name.  PeterM88 (talk) 22:06, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  LOW BIRK HATT
File talk:Camden.lock.market.london.arp.jpg

message: Hi - this image doesn't actually show Camden Lock market, as the caption says; it's actually just the nearby canal lock. Only a very small part of the market is visible in the picture, at upper middle left. And I have no idea how to delete it from the Camden Market entry. 86.137.174.166 01:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Presidents Day (disambiguation)

message: This is the Talkpage for improving this article. 01:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Presidents Day" used to redirect to Washington's birthday.  Should it again?  President's Day, Presidents' day, President's day, and Presidents day all redirect there. That would suggest that the consensus is that "Presidents Day" regardless of capitalization and punctuation refers primarily to Washington's Birthday, the U.S. Federal Holiday.  I think that we should follow the consensus by turning this page into Presidents Day (disambiguation) (For example see Macedon and Macedon (disambiguation)) and redirecting "Presidents Day" to Washington's Birthday. --Bruce Hall (talk) 03:40, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be redirected to Washington's Birthday?
Talk:Karim El Ahmadi

message: I have removed El Ahmadi's height from the infobox, because there is significant disagreement between sources. Aston Villa say 185 cm, the BBC and Feyenoord 179 cm. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:51, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 
Talk:Orlando Engelaar

message: How can man be of two heights, unless one measurement be at dawn, and t'other in t'evening?
Men, who wrote "POULIMENOS"? No cyberbullying we said, no cyberbullying, you are in a wiki!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.69.185.178 (talk) 14:29, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Du Shi

message: Well, it's about time someone made an article on Du Shi. Lol. For those interested in metallurgy or Chinese history, it's a must.
--PericlesofAthens 01:16, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just expanded the article with a new life section using Crespigny's book.--Pericles of AthensTalk 04:02, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Relight My Fire

message: Was it really the Dan Hartman version that was used in the Swedish Melodifestivalen? I was, until now, sure that it was a very lame edit of the Take That version. /130.240.199.83 (talk) 11:56, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I found a YouTube clip, it was actually a very lame edit of the Dan Hartman version. /130.240.199.83 (talk) 11:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious

message: Why does it say Loleatta Holloway was one of the features singers in the original version? She's the ONLY featured singer other than Dan Hartman, no?
Also there is no mention of the fact that it was remade by Ricky Martin and Loleatta Holloway as a promo-only single. Dollvalley (talk) 20:56, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of the features singers? / Remake 

message: Both albums Keep The Fire burnin' and Superhits say the song is from 1978. Not just that, but the full title the the original version of the song is name Vertigo/Relight My Fire.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suckersucker (talk • contribs) 18:18, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1979?
Talk:Buffering agent

message: This article is written terribly. It needs a complete re-write. -128.101.53.196 01:19, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

message: There is nothing of significance in this article that is not covered in Buffer solution. None of the statements carry proper citations. 
Any suggestions for transfer of material currently in this article to Buffer solution may be listed here before I propose that the article  "Buffering agent" be nominated for deletion. Petergans (talk) 17:18, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete this article?
Talk:Comparison of temperature scales

message: A graph with the different lines and curves would be nice to show the relations here.--Bfesser 01:26, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Exact (defined) values should be highlighted in the table.
—DIV (128.250.204.118 08:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinguish values 

message: Why is the melting point of titanium listed here?  What is the relevance? 199.91.34.33 (talk) 20:15, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titanium?
Talk:Lake of the Woods, Peoria County, Illinois

message: This article conflates two locations, the Lake of the Woods unincorporated area of Champaign County IL, and the Lake of the Woods Peoria County IL. 104.145.77.223 (talk) 02:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @104.145.77.223 correct this is not north of peoria 2600:1700:3D93:930:C1F8:7A93:B7F0:41C4 (talk) 02:12, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong information
Talk:J. A. O. Preus II

message: It is not a little infantile and biased for Wikipedia to imply "conservative" is either less than or not "moderate" compared to others, as in this piece, common for self-righteous, self-identified "liberals," though really educated people (the few there are these days) deplore both "conservative" and "liberal" as meaningless terms of mere infantile, biased, name-calling unless used SOLELY as adjectives, not nouns.  Russ Davis  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.182.35.18 (talk) 19:18, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Martin Luther bibliography

message: Today I removed all the    tags throughout the article. There was nothing visible on any of them that was adding to the article. In doing so, I did not replace with any  <ref> tags. The current formatting of the article did not present a great way to do this without examining a way, I felt, without probably reorganizing the whole article. To reference which bibliography entries had the long-deprecated tag, this revision was the most recent to feature them (and it was not on all entries). Ehler (talk) 23:08, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite/ref tags
Talk:List of films about Martin Luther

message: I have rewitten this article in light of the AfD, with the hopes of retaining it, and then moving it to something like Martin Luther in film and television, and merging it with Luther (film).  Pastordavid 19:18, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD

message: Since this page now seems to be a redirect to the main Martin Luther article, I'm going to remove the assessment tag since there is no longer anything to assess. -- jackturner3 13:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing Wikiproject Lutheranism Assessment Tag
Talk:Spirit of Peoria

message: Noting that the boat's website  was copypasted from this revision . Since they copied us, there's no issue on our end. Wizardman 04:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: I spotted her travelling south on the Chain of Rocks Canal, just north of St Louis, in August 2016. Mr Larrington (talk) 00:45, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operating Area
Talk:To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation

message: This page is poorly written and needs to be revised in order to make it more readable.  Also, certain things need to be reorganized to make more sense.  For example, consider the following section, which currently closes the article:
:This treatise, which has been called a "cry from the heart of the people" and a "blast on the war trumpet," was the first publication Luther produced after he was convinced that a break with Rome was both inevitable and unavoidable.[11] In it he attacked what he regarded as the "three walls of the Romanists": (1) that secular authority has no jurisdiction over them; (2) that only the pope is able to explain Scripture; (3) that nobody but the Pope himself can call a general church council.[12]
Since this section serves as a summary of the work in question, it would make more sense to have it in the opening section than at the end, where it currently resides.  Therefore I've moving it to the opening part of the article.Spiritquest (talk) 19:48, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The quality of the writing needs to be improved 

message: In addition to the opening section about the Three Walls, Luther's address also includes sections entitled "Of The Matters To Be Considered In The Councils" and "Twenty-Seven Articles: Respecting The Reformation Of The Christian Estate."  Additional material needs to be added to the article to cover these sections of Luther's treatise as well. Spiritquest (talk) 16:05, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs to be completed
Talk:City News Los Angeles

message: I've removed the following unsourced/POV/OR info but wanted to preserve the phrasing here in case any of it can be reincorporated into the article with proper citation.:
:[... created to serve the LGBT community] consistent with journalistic standards found in mainstream media outlets. Abandoning classified advertising promoting escorts and masseurs, CNLA has attracted the interest of national advertisers. It leads many other competitors within the gay media in its diverse coverage of lifestyle issues, gaycentric or not. Its online presence was established in 2002 and incorporated many advanced features, including RSS feeds and myriad CMS (Content Management Systems) devices.
TAnthony 18:52, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced/POV/OR info
Talk:The Famous Flames

message: I tagged this article for multiple issues. The "editorial" tag applies most acutely to the "Rock & Roll Hall of Fame controversy and 2012 Induction", "Legacy", and "Lineup" sections, while redundancy and copy editing are problems throughout. InnocuousPseudonym (talk) 08:17, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I corrected most of the issues you cited.  Let me know.  Onel5969 (talk) 03:48, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Tags

message: :There were eight entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion. 
*ELpoints #3) states: 
*LINKFARM states: 
*ELMIN: . -- 
*ELCITE:   --  Otr500 (talk) 22:22, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Same-sex marriage in Hawaii

message: What? Why was this never made effective before the Amendment? And why doesn't it mandate Civil Unions, which the Amendment didn't ban?--Occono (talk) 15:44, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess you mean why the Supreme Court decision didn't allow for marriages in 1993? I'm not sure and couldn't find much on the history online (I didn't check books on- or offline), but it seems everything was put on hold for some reason until the amendment passed. And civil unions are only known in the US since 2000 when Vermont created them. Hekerui (talk) 00:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Supreme Court Decision

message: What was wrong with the tables? Samesexmarriage101 (talk) 17:51, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure we should reuse the tables in the form given in the release because it could be construed as copyright infringement, when a summary in one's own words suffices. Granted, whether copying a table constitutes copyright infringement can be debated, but we link the source so the table can be looked up directly. Hekerui (talk) 18:22, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recognition of same-sex unions in Hawaii 

message: Hi!  I'm having trouble nailing down what Mike Gabbard actually did to oppose same-sex marriage in Hawaii, and the question is also coming up on the Tulsi Gabbard page, which I'm particularly working to improve right now.  Did Mike Gabbard help write or campaign for Hawaii Constitutional Amendment 2 (1998)? 
I've checked around the web (Civil Beat is unclear on this issue) and started checking the references for LGBT rights in Hawaii.  Can anyone give me some pointers and citations?  Thanks. Sumana Harihareswara 03:06, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mike Gabbard & opposition to same-sex unions in Hawaii 

message: Please consider using this material to improve the article. ~KvnG 23:15, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jackson v. Abercrombie]]
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam/LinkSearch/Militaryavenue.com

message: Can someone please explain to me why it is wrong to have links to our site in areas that make sense?  Can I tell who is doing this and if they work for a competing site?  It just seems odd that our site is a valid site as seen on defenslink.mil.  Please remove this from the spam list. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.205.121.151  (talk) 
:The addition of Militaryavenue.com links fell foul of several of our guidelines 
:* Wikipedia is not a portal.  In general external links should add encyclopedic information, which this website does not.
:* Addition of links to sites that you are connected with is not appropriate - such sites should be listed on the article's talk page with a request that other, independent editors review it and add it if they agree it is appropriate.
:* Mass addition of sites that have not been agreed to by the community is generally seen as spamming, especially when done by an editor who has no history of adding content to articles. The fact that a site is a good website doesn't mean it can't be spammed - any addition of links to promote a site fits our definition of spamming.
:This is all based on the idea that we are trying to build a neutral GFDL encyclopedia.  External links do little towards that goal and favoring one resource over another without consideration (especially by someone with an inherent conflict of interest) does not help us be neutral.  We appreciate efforts to increase the content on Wikipedia and would welcome your participation in improving our articles.  See the welcome page for more on how to contribute to the project.  Thanks -- Siobhan Hansa 13:16, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Civil union in the United States

message: I just made some edits to refocus the article on civil unions. The article before my edits was more of a summary of same-sex unions in the US. It barely mentioned civil unions, did not discuss their history, and had lists of states having every kind of same-sex union.
I therefore added some text from civil union, removed the same-sex marriage list, removed states with limited domestic partnerships (leaving only the ones similar to civil unions), and removed the section on states considering same-sex unions. As only one state, Illinois, was considering civil unions, it didn't seem worthwhile leaving the list after removing those states considering same-sex marriage or domestic partnership.
Even after my edits, the article is fully deserving of its "start" status, but I think is much improved. -Rrius (talk) 04:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: June 1 Edits

message: This news article says that Hawaii is moving forward with civil unions.  Should this information be posted in this article?
http://www.hrcbackstory.org/2010/01/hawaii-update-civil-unions-moving-forward/ -- Native94080 (talk) 06:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hawaii Update: Civil Unions Moving Forward

message: The Illinois section is completely incoherent. --192.135.179.248 (talk) 19:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Illinois
Talk:Claudine (manga)

message: Has anyone looked at the influence of Radclyffe Hall's The Well of Loneliness on Claudine? It seems to me that the eponymous main character is partly influenced by Hall's protagonist, Stephen Gordon. Given the period setting, I wonder, too, whether we are meant to interpret Claudine as trans in the modern sense, or as what sexologists of the 1920s-30s, as referenced by Hall, called an "invert" or "third sex"? Claudine's psychiatrist's speeches would fit that context, too. A comparison with The Well of Loneliness would be interesting. Silverwhistle (talk) 09:37, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Literary influences?
Talk:Jeffree Star

message: I disagree, as the source provided doesn’t state Star smokes in Wyoming at all. User  believes it should be included. Many celebrities smoke weed but we don’t include state laws over it. In my belief it’s pointless.  Pillowdelight (talk) 18:36, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Including details about the legality of cannabis seems unnecessary. ---Another Believer (Talk) 01:17, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

text: @Pillowdelight while it does seem relevant between the sentence on his cannabis use and living in Wyoming, we don't know if he's smoked there. All it does is imply that he's breaking the law. We should remove it Houdinipeter (talk) 01:17, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, with both of you  and . It’s unnecessary. I’m not sure how many users are needed to determine if it’s able to be removed. As user  most likely wont even respond back. Pillowdelight (talk) 01:59, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Wyomings cannabis laws be mentioned? 

message: Fanneran (talk) 09:11, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Actualcpscm (talk) 10:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 June 2023
Template talk:Walt Disney World resort sidebar

message: This template is for use on pages like the Walt Disney World Resort and other resort pages of the same.Phydend 02:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was about time I suppose, but this thing's a bit of a monstrosity. The letters are too large (considering WDW has like eight thousand properties) and the green is a pain. SergioGeorgini 07:56, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Klavarskribo

message: Are there any sources supporting that "music teachers felt threatened"?
Matthewwithanm 02:08, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I've tried to tone down some of the rather gushing advocacy of Klavarskribo in this article. Might it be worth adding a "criticisms" section? Klavarskribo has several obvious (to me) shortcomings compared to conventional notation but we need something from a citable source. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 19:13, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I explained in my [edit summary, I removed the link because Facebook is one of the sites mentioned in the "Links normally to be avoided" section of Wikipedia:External links. There is no indication that your Facebook page is "an official page of the article's subject", as required by the guidelines, so I will remove it again. I don't understand your point about the spelling: as far as I can see the name is never spelt with a C in the article. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 10:56, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms?
Talk:The Adventures of Smilin' Jack (serial)

message: No, Tommy Thompson is clearly a substitute for Downwind Jaxon, a character who could not be used in the serial due to the way he was depicted - he was always facing away from the reader because his face was so handsome, it could never be seen.  All we knew for sure was that he was blonde and that he was so good-looking, he attracted girls wherever he went - a recurring gag in the comic strip that was used whenever Downwind appeared.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Glammazon (talk • contribs) 17:46, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Portal talk:Holidays/Calendar

message: *Portal:Holidays/Calender/January
*Portal:Holidays/Calender/February
*Portal:Holidays/Calender/March
*Portal:Holidays/Calender/April
*Portal:Holidays/Calender/May
*Portal:Holidays/Calender/June
*Portal:Holidays/Calender/July
*Portal:Holidays/Calender/August
*Portal:Holidays/Calender/September
*Portal:Holidays/Calender/October
*Portal:Holidays/Calender/November
*Portal:Holidays/Calender/December
Needs updating to 2008 calendars 71.164.223.212 (talk) 13:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

message: There is a mistake: the day of the week is not correct!
--Angelo.Muratore (talk) 10:45, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ok all the days are 2011 now. Some off the holidays may be off but most are correct.  Joe I 20:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 2011

message: Just that seems to be completely off. Not sure if it is maintained by anyone.KarlDubost (talk) 07:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong calendar