Talk:Night Riviera

message: Would it be more accurate to say that it one of three remaining sleepers, as there are two Caledonian Sleepers - the Highland and the Lowland?--Tivedshambo (talk) 15:31, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Currently this page looks dreadfully like a timetable, which wikipedia is not. Please see User:Mangoe/Wikipedia is not a timetable. Emoscopes Talk 12:21, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Style

message: This article states that this is one of three sleeper services. The Caledonian Sleeper article says it is one of two. This is inconsistent can we resolve this and update the erroneous article. Wilmot1 21:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Night Rivera is either one of two (Rivera + Caledonian) or three (Riveria + Highlander + Lowlander), or six (Rivera + Fort William + Inverness + Aberdeen + Glasgow + Edinburgh), ...depending on how to count.  Take your pick!  —Sladen (talk) 21:16, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of sleeper services 

message: Sometime between October 2007 and March 2008 the Night Rivera stock finally got a repaint into Barbie colours, seemingly as a follow-on to the general HST Mk3 refurbishment.  eg.  2008-03-01 dated picture.  First report I can find is of one sleeper in the rake having received its repaint as of 2007-10-19.  —Sladen (talk) 21:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Barbie paint job

message: The image :Image:GreatWesternLogo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --06:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:GreatWesternLogo.png

message: So how long does the journey take? The article doesn't say (unless I missed it). A check on thetrainline.co.uk shows that the journey takes five hours during the day and eight hours at night; why the difference? Does the sleeper train go slower, or is the route more tortuous? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 20:15, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sleeper trains go slower to give the passengers a chance ...to sleep!  —Sladen (talk) 03:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Time

message: Do we really need to list the available facilities on the train here?  It seems to read like an advert to me. ZoeL (talk) 08:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not. They amy be appropriate in WikiTravel but are probably in contravention of WP:NOTGUIDE that states Wiki is not a travel guide. Geof Sheppard (talk) 12:50, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facilities 

message: Since the Night Riviera sleeper is part of the current extended franchise and is likely to be part of the new franchise, would it not make more sense to merge this page in with Great Western Railway
thanksbutnothanks 20:16, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Great Western Railway (train operating company)|Great Western Railway]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Night Riviera. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090829214915/http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk:80/Content.aspx?id=1555 to http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/Content.aspx?id=1555
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Non-free content unacceptable use point 17 states:
:The following is a non-exhaustive list of examples where non-free content may not be used outside of the noted exceptions…
::17. The logo of an entity used for identification of one of its child entities, when the child entity lacks their own branding. Specific child entity logos remain acceptable.
So in a nutshell, the GWR logo can only be used on the GWR article and not child articles such as this. The only logo that should be used on this article is a Night Rivera specific one. Geeuuare (talk) 23:45, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is no specific logo, then no logo should be included. Policy stated above is quite clear that the logo of a parent cannot be substituted in lieu. That a logo sat their wrongly for years is of no relevance. If still in doubt, suggest getting a 3rd opinion. Geeuuare (talk) 06:12, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:07, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion