Talk:Art forgery

message: Terahertz wave forgery detection is a new method that might merit a mention.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.250.148.7 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 13 May 2007 
*  Terahertz wave, forgery detection are both Rdrs to nominally relevant articles. --Jerzy•t 06:48, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  detection 

message: In episode 3 of Fake or Fortune? presenter Fiona Bruce consults this article several times (first at about 27 minutes in). --Anthonyhcole (talk) 13:42, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fake or fortune 

message: Edme Sansom, contrary to the statements in this article, did not forge anything.  He created reproductions which were signed as Samsons, tho the signature might not always be easy to find. If the ceramics then were sold into the art market as "genuine so-and-sos" that is not on Samson.184.148.67.99 (talk) 19:22, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samson: reproductions not forgeries 

message: Is there some reason why Wolfgang Beltracchi is not included in the list of well-known forgers? I am aware that he has been the subject of repeated onslaughts to this article by sockpuppets of User:David Adam Kess, so I don't want to add it myself without knowing the background. But it seems to me that he (having a Wikipedia article about him and his forgeries) would be a logical addition to the list. I request someone who is familiar with this article to consider it, and either add this name or not, as you judge best. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 15:47, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wolfgang Beltracchi 

message: Enough testimony, criminal charges and indictments have been published at this point to prove that Knoedler Inc. in New York sold dozens of faked paintings. Perhaps it is time to incluse it in the list of known dealers of forged art?198.58.164.152 (talk) 19:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knoedler 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Art forgery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.artsandantique.net/Articles/Miscellaneous/Featured-Misadventures-in-Collecting.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100829165309/http://www.quantes.nl/uitgeverij.php?aut=4 to http://www.quantes.nl/uitgeverij.php?aut=4
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121015140627/http://www.artcrimeresearch.org/postgraduate-certificate-program/ to http://www.artcrimeresearch.org/postgraduate-certificate-program
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Art forgery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060524052007/http://www.spurlock.uiuc.edu/explorations/research/collecting.pdf to http://www.spurlock.uiuc.edu/explorations/research/collecting.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: My personal experience, (so WP:OR) is that some paper does indeed have a short life, but others have a surprisingly long life. This is also true for photographic film.  Is there a reference for the 2-5 year life?  As well as I know it, older papers seem to have longer life than newer ones. Gah4 (talk) 21:14, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Since unused photographic paper has a short (2–5 years) ''