Talk:2006 United States Senate election in Missouri

message: I've seen several other Senate race articles that have a separate table for each polling agency. The benefit of this approach is that every polling agency has different methodology and by having them on separate tables you can do an apples to apples comparison and see trends in the polling. What are everyone's thoughts on changing to separate tables for each polling agency? --Bobblehead 20:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate table for each polling agency

message: If the candidates are Jim Talent & Claire McCaskill, is that Jim Talent versus Claire McCaskill??  & Catskill??
hopiakuta 17:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, Dary.  I think it will be somewhat to fairly difficult, but far from "almost impossible".  -- Sholom 13:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[talent]] [[versus]] [[skill]] 

message: Wouldn't it be better to designate all the partisan pollsters than none of them?  I do, however, agree with PWilson's 10/25 edit, in that it's better to remove all designations than have only some. 
--Topher0128 21:32, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding designating partisan pollsters

message: I take issue with the first line in the following paragraph:
If Talent does win, then a Democratic takeover of the U.S. Senate becomes almost impossible; the Democrats' need to win six seats to take control of the chamber with 51 seats. To do this, they would need to retain their 19 incumbent seats, win the four Republican-held seats of Montana, Ohio, Rhode Island, and Pennsylvania (where Democratic chances seem above 50%) and two of the following three "toss up" races: Missouri,Tennessee and Virginia).
How is the notion that the Democrats winning the remaining two "toss up" races seemingly impossible? If I flip a coin twice I don't think it's impossible for it to come up heads twice. That line should be removed. Anyone disagree? Dary 05:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you, Dary.  I think it will be somewhat to fairly difficult, but far from "almost impossible".  -- Sholom 13:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talent win makes Democratic Senate impossible??

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on United States Senate election in Missouri, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060808190341/http://www.stltoday.com:80/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/8CD39743858142E086257197005F0EAB?OpenDocument to http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/8CD39743858142E086257197005F0EAB?OpenDocument
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on United States Senate election in Missouri, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061129111847/http://www.msnbc.msn.com:80/id/11410626/site/newsweek/ to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11410626/site/newsweek
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061029015314/http://www.dfw.com:80/mld/dfw/business/13710191.htm to http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/business/13710191.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100517095318/http://www.usnews.com:80/usnews/news/articles/061026/26politicalwire.htm to http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/061026/26politicalwire.htm
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20061005190751/http://www.galluppoll.com:80/content/?ci=24358 to http://www.galluppoll.com/content/?ci=24358
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060808190341/http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/8CD39743858142E086257197005F0EAB?OpenDocument to http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/stlouiscitycounty/story/8CD39743858142E086257197005F0EAB?OpenDocument
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on United States Senate election in Missouri, 2006. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927021227/http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1192 to http://www.zogby.com/news/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1192
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:34, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified