Talk:Samma dynasty

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Samma dynasty. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121023164900/http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Hormuz to http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Hormuz
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120606120407/https://archnet.org/library/places/one-place.jsp?place_id=2179&order_by=year&showdescription=1 to http://archnet.org/library/places/one-place.jsp?place_id=2179&order_by=year&showdescription=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:53, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: According to historian Chintaman Vinayak Vaidya Sammas were originally Lohana kshatriya. Reference: History of mediaeval Hindu India, page no. 189[]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.233.59.20 (talk) 08:16, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samma were [[Kshatriya]]

message: "The Sammas, a Lohana tribe, gained control of Thatta in the southern Sindh from the Sumras around 1335, and expanded their territory northward to Bhakkar and beyond.."
No citation reference has been provided RS6784 (talk) 09:11, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrectly added lohana there without any citation 

message: Samma are not Lohana tribe 2409:4041:2E16:67E7:0:0:5B8B:2409 (talk) 14:33, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Interesting Geek (talk) 18:11, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 September 2021 

message: Samma is originally Kshatriya not Lohana tribe 2409:4041:2E16:67E7:0:0:5B8B:2409 (talk) 14:35, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Interesting Geek (talk) 18:12, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 25 September 2021 (2) 

message: According to Chachnama, Samma was a branch of Lohana tribe. Ala al-Din Khiljl (1296-1316) mounted a number of campaigns in the region battling the Sumra princes whose cycle of capitulation/rebellion could be charted exactly to the perceived military stress on the metropole. Yet, the Delhi Sultans and their governor rarely resorted to invading Sumra held territories - relying, instead, on alliances with tribal elite and local power struggles. Against the Sumras, Khiljl advanced the cause of the Lohana tribe of Samma. The conflict guaranteed a rolling supply of princes and tribal chiefs wanting alliances with the center. The tussle for dominance between the Sumras and the Samma lasted until the reign of Firuz Shah Tughluq (1351- 1388), when the Jam emirs of Samma were finally able to end Sumra dominance, taking over lower Sindh.
 Please add this Section in article. I provide two reliable references. Thanks in advances.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.228.106.219 (talk) 11:15, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: . TrangaBellam (talk) 20:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin and Establishment 

message: Once again the illict-imperial Urdu Speakings have restored the page with Urdu to meet their own audiences when they don't realize that Urdu Speaking didn't exist in Sindh till 1947 and that Samma dynasty was one of the greatest Sindhi dynasties ever and now that you guys want to ruin it for your own "Pakistan" or holy land you guys have done the changing of it removing the rights of Native Sindhis from the page.
I ask once again for why? you cannot Erase Sindhi language, history and nation from root doing so will be sured that Karama will pay back to you.
Jeay Sindh.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NameIsShaheer (talk • contribs) 10:21, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urdu-Speaking domination on the page. 

message: @Sutyarashi Lohanas and Jats are different caste. This is academic reference. Read footnote 151,  I request admin to correct it in main page and remove Jat word from the main article. https://archive.org/details/ReligionAndSocietyInArabSind/page/n201/mode/1up  49.43.33.176 (talk) 12:52, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry but that's what André Wink reference states. If you have any objection over it, you can take it to WP:RSN. Sutyarashi (talk) 15:06, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jats and Lohana are different castes