lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Voiceless retroflex plosive

message: Is this the sound used in pronunciation of the word Tamil? gren グレン 03:20, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that's a denti-alveolar . kwami 04:01, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I wasn't sure what it was.  I just know I can't say it :( Is there a page for that on wikipedia? gren グレン 04:19, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Which sound are you refering to? The "t" of 'Tamil' should be pretty straightforward, though I haven't heard it. The "l" is not, however. Is that what you're asking about? As far as I know, it's either an alveolar approximant or a retroflex approximant, not too far off from an English /r/. kwami 05:31, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

text: @Grenavitar traditionally regarded (in sanskrit) as voiceless dental stop; it is more or less denti alveolar 't'. u have a common wiki page for dose dental n alveolar stops. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voiceless_dental_and_alveolar_plosives?wprov=sfla1 Inquisitive creature (talk) 03:40, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: In the Standard Mandarin phonology section, there is a phoneme [ʈʂʰ], and here in the Tibetan section. [ʈʰʂ] is found. Is it possible that these two phonemes are the same, or [ʈʰʂ] exists seperatedly? I don't think the front plosive consonants could be aspirated. Tache 02:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ʈʂʰ or ʈʰʂ?

message: Isn't voiceless retroflex plosive used in English in other words than the native time which is described in the article? For instance in court or sport? Plufs190 (talk) 09:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi] 20:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Possibly in Highland English as spoken in the Hebrides due to Scottish Gaelic influence but I don't have a citation for that. Alázhlis 00:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voiceless retroflex plosive
Talk:Sermon on the Mound

message: I read the whole speech and nowhere does Thatcher mention the Good Samaritan, so I removed it from the article (although I know she did comment on that parable, but not in this speech). - Johnbull 03:21, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Quite right.  I don't know why that quote has become associated with this speech, but in fact she made it away  back in 1968 in Blackpool : "The point is that even the Good Samaritan had to have the money to help, otherwise he too would have had to pass on the other side."  But she repeated it on TV in 1980 : "No-one would remember the good Samaritan if he'd only had good intentions; he had money as well." In 1988 it was quoted back at her in Parliament (PM question time) by Win Griffiths : "The Prime Minister thought that the most significant thing about the parable of the Good Samaritan... [Interruption] ...was that he had money in his pocket to help those in need. Will she now, in the spirit of the Good Samaritan, advocate that all those who have received money beyond their wildest dreams from the Chancellor in the Budget should give it back to help those people, or does she prefer the parable of Lazarus and the rich man?"  --Doric Loon 13:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Does anyone know if it would be possible to get a photo of the actual event? The photo in this newspaper article would be perfect, if it is in the public domain: https://www.heraldscotland.com/opinion/16240741.thatchers-sermon-mound-widely-misinterpreted/.  --Doric Loon (talk) 01:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Avicenna Peak

message: The two links (Interfax and Presidential web page) do not give anything on the name of this peak: the Interfax link [1] is dead, and the Presidential page [2] has nothing on peaks and mountains at the URL specified. It seems that the Presidential decree referred to in the URL has been removed from the database on the web. Can you find where it is hiding now? --Zlerman (talk) 02:58, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead links

message: It seems that Avicenna Peak (7134 m) is Lenin Peak (7134 m), while Revolution Peak (6974 m) is Independence Peak (6974 m). See my discussion under "Naming controversy" in Talk:Lenin Peak. I am going to try and fix the peak articles accordingly.--Zlerman (talk) 06:53, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming controversy
Talk:Ushiku Daibutsu

message: This article claims that the Ushiku Daibutsu is the largest Buddha statue in the world. However the "See Also" section lists the Nara Daibutsu as the tallest in Japan, and the Kamakura Daibutsu as the second tallest in the country. I'll look into finding a proper list of rankings but if anyone else knows, please edit. Smoove K 03:35, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was under the impression that the Nara & Kamakura Buddhas were the largest bronze Buddhas in the country (the Ushiku one is stone), but, being that they are both seated Buddhas, and the Ushiku Daibutsu stands almost 30 meters taller than the Statue of Liberty, I find it difficult to believe that it would not be the tallest Buddha in the world. Keep in mind also that the Nara Buddha is indoors, and the Kamakura Buddha was at one time too. They may be large, but neither come anywhere close to the height of the Ushiku Daibutsu. Perhaps some rewording needs to be done on these articles... LordAmeth 11:58, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Ushiku Daibutsu is definitely not stone -- it's got a bronze exterior over a steel skeleton. 61.118.155.22 (talk) 09:17, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I've lived near/visited all of them and I know that Ushiku is the tallest by far. Since "being large" is the important factor rather than the shape of the statue, I'll add "bronze" to the descriptions of Nara and Kamakura. This seems like a safe correction. Smoove K 07:23, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  World's tallest? 

message: Need picture. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.40.195.248 (talk • contribs)  15:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need Picture 

message: How it was built? There is no details about that. emijrp (talk) 21:12, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction 
Talk:Michael Graves

message: Could you create a page for the Plocek Residence design, please?  --24.186.223.176 (talk) 21:54, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plocek Residence 

message: * This long list of structures, which could be more than 300 if they're all listed, and may work better as a sortable table (by project name, location, year, etc.) Shall I proceed to create one for this section? Rosalina523 (talk) 15:52, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Table format for Works section
Talk:Julian (given name)

message: It is a well known fact that the name Julian derives from the latin name giulio. It refers to a disgustingly sexy and attractive guy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 131.104.248.102 (talk) 01:17, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Giulio is a late (Italian) manifestation of Julius, while Julianus is a derivation of Julius, and Giuliano is the late manifestation of Julianus. (Read "I" for "J" if you need.) -- spincontrol 02:36, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning 

message: The names were in no logical order, and one of them came in twice. 
There are also four that link to nothing - should they go?  --GwydionM 13:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganised 

message: What is it that attracts dunderheads to vandalize the Julian page so frequently??? -- spincontrol 02:36, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persistent vandalism 

message: So, 'Jolyon', a pretty common name according to searches both here and on Google. However, doesn't have its own article, nor is it listed on this article under alternate spellings. A quick search on a couple of baby name websites shows that quite often 'Jolyon' is redirected to 'Julian'. Should it be added here (and a redirect created too), or does it get its own article. 'Jolyon' experts of the world, have your say! Grunners (talk) 16:45, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found enough to suggest it merits its own article, so voila! Jolyon. Grunners (talk) 10:29, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jolyon
Talk:Ritchie's Archipelago

message: I have removed or rephrased the text (mostly concerning Ritchie) which actually appears to be in copyvio of material presented at the Andaman Assn. website, on this page. These edits were first introduced with this edit in Jul 2005; although one or two words have been changed, the similarity was too close to be safe. I have also further amended the text, & changed the structure a little to be more amenable to futher expansion.--cjllw | TALK 04:25, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note:  Project Banner with Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Andaman and Nicobar Islands or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Andaman and Nicobar Islands workgroup Addition
Talk:Unshelved

message: This comic just got mentioned in the Boston Globe. Someone should insert a link to the article. Xuanwu 23:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Boston Globe article

message: I believe the town name, Mallville, is due to the town they are located in being centered around a Mall.  I don't recall it being a Superman pun.  Since the names of the other towns mentioned in the comic are also Mall related, I lean towards that.  Maybe we can get someone to check on that.  --70.61.104.62 (talk) 01:12, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mallville
Talk:Binomial (polynomial)

message: binomial distribution is great!
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.87.251.41 (talk • contribs) 04:31, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: we know (a+b)^n=....
what about (a+b)^c=???  with c>0
Jackzhp 21:44, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  a similar problem 

message: Are something this article appears to lack completely, though it's a rather nicely written article. I suggest that this article be tagged for needing some citations. A math-wiki (talk) 05:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations???? 

message: Is it really advisable to make the definition of binomial dependent on an understanding of "monomial", rather than just using the more common "terms" in the first instance? Doing so throws the reader who wants to understand the meaning of binomial into the monomial article which, in my opinion, is a confusing mess.  I've looked at a few mathematical encyclopedias, all of which state that a binomial is a "polynomial with two terms."  The more precise mathematical definition in the Definition section makes it clear what a "term" looks like. I agree that this isn't the most precise use of the word "term" but it is the way "term" is commonly used when discussing polynomials.
Note that I'm not objecting to referencing the "terms" if binomial as monomial somewhere, but the definition of binomial that has recently been edited into article makes the definition fail to stand alone.  The reader who doesn't know the meaning of binomial is unlikely to be helped much by being told to look up monomial. Federalist51 (talk) 14:52, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition relying on definition of monomial 

message: If there is "no consensus," shouldn't the article revert to the last stable title, which was binomial? H. Humbert (talk) 00:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: No, since there was a consensus established against that title in the previous RM. I also think it is well agreed that Binomial (polynomial) is better than Binomial equation. Personally, I thought we were going to end up with Binomial expression, but that doesn't seem to have happened. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No consensus
Talk:List of FARC attacks in 2005

message: Howdy!  I've marked this new article NPOV.  It seems pretty fawning about the FARC, and the title is really wacky.  I'm hoping the original author or others can fix it.  Also, can anyone discuss why this should not be merged into FARC? - CHAIRBOY (☎) 04:33, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why did you delete the NPOV tag without discussing it here?  I'm full of WP:AGF, but your actions seem questionable.  I'll put it back tomorrow if someone else doesn't, but this is 3RR realm. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 05:31, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, the main reason to not merge this into FARC (or perhaps more properly, the subset of FARC-related pieces that have surfaced recently, which logically still need some work) has to do with length concerns. A secondary reason has to do with the perceived importance of the FARC's specific changes in strategy in recent months. Still, I do agree with Chairboy in the sense that the NPOV tag is justified until necessary edits are made or discussed, and should not be unilaterally removed. As User 203.94.... had previously mentioned, I do intend to make edits to try to at least begin to fix that, but obviously this doesn't mean that contributions from other Wikipedia members aren't welcome and/or necessary too. Juancarlos2004 15:12, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

text: I'm removing the tag for now, since several changes, including the title, have been made in the days and months following its inclusion. If anyone still has any objections , obviously this can be discussed all over again. Juancarlos2004 16:21, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Hola, welcome to Wikipedia. I don't think that you are really "at risk", all things considered, at least not due to anything you might do here (don't know about your situation in real life, obviously). In any case, I agree (though perhaps for different reasons) that those articles still need a lot of work, in one way or another. If it's possible, could you explain more clearly what your point of view is? Exactly what would you want to edit, and edit into what? Thanks in advance. Btw, please try to read the guidelines on how to edit pages, sign comments and so on. Juancarlos2004 22:21, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Drilling

message: * Drilling and threading - Unhelpful structure and lack of info, particularly on threading. --Smack (talk) 04:37, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The term drilling has many meanings, including:
*verb tense:  boring a hole, in many contexts
*verb tense:  training, such as military drilling
*noun:  a 3-barrel combination gun
I think this article should be moved to something like "drilling (machining)" or "drilling (tool operation)" and the name "drilling" used for a disambiguation page, pointing to appropriate articles.  scot 15:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?

message: "Hot Water Drill" redirects to this page, but there isn't anything on hot water drilling (used to make holes in glaciers or in the arctic/antarctic, also possibly used to punch through the ice covering planets or moons like Europa).  I'll try to get the ball rolling on that in the next few days but in case I get distracted, I'm making this note here.  --75.73.176.26 (talk) 06:14, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hot water drilling 

message: This is not comprehensible without explaining what actually moves and which way. The entire bit as a whole or does it bend in some way? And is the movement around, along, or back and forth across the axis? --Espoo (talk) 04:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  axial vibration
Talk:Pulse oximeter

message: The finger sensor in the picture on the blood gas monitor page appears to be upside-down; the wire should be trailing off the top of the finger, shouldn't it?  (I'm no expert.)
Peter 05:10, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Always used this one like this... perhaps different models have different usage, I don't know :p Rama 07:18, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

text: I don't think it makes much of a difference.  In my experience, they will work in either orientation.  I believe common orientation is with LEDs on top, which is why the wire is on top.Dmcmorris 09:36, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The

message: I have never heard about noninvasive devices measuring pH, pCO2 or other blood gas values. The term "blood gas monitor" is incorrect and confusing, so I moved this page to "pulse oximeter", which is a much more current term. I will adjust redirects.
:I don't think that the term "blood gas monitor" should redirect here, at least not with out clear information that pules oximeters do NOT measure blood gases.--Sindritraustason (talk) 07:48, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, there is end-tidal CO2 measurement, based on completely different principles. JFW | T@lk 16:55, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The move 

message: Does anyone know who invented the pulse oximeter?
:From what I could gather via Google, a certain Dr. Takuo Aoyagi is credited as the "inventor" of the pulse oximeter. Couldn't verify this other than the fact that it was cited in a lot of search links Animeronin 18:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  who invented 

message: I've wondered about the accuracy of the fingertip oxygen monitors.  Any information?
67.42.157.137 19:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How accurate are the inexpensive fingertip monitors? 

message: Can someone verify this?Pulse oximetry is the most important safety development in anesthesia.I have no diea where to put this from. Any ideas? --Animeronin 18:44, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unverified Claim 

message: I suggest merging "pulse oximetry" into "pulse oximeter", discussing both topics in one article.
There is enough overlap in talking about "the measuring instrument" and "the process of measuring" that I don't see the need for separate articles.
Do we have separate articles for thermometry and thermometer?
--68.0.124.33 (talk) 23:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: I suggest pulse oximeter be merged into pulse oximetry...
this makes more sense, since the main topic should be the main article, and there should / could be a sub section for a particular tool used for pulse oximetry.
purpleidea (talk) 21:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  +1 for the merge --MarmotteiNoZ 00:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge the OTHER way
Talk:1079 Life

message: This radio station is not called Life FM (Adelaide).  I knowingly named the article 1079 Life FM because that is the official name of the radio station.  Life FM (Adelaide) is a bad format just like you don't call Nova_91.9 Nova (Adelaide).
Think about your actions before making them.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mischarocks (talk • contribs) 16:59, 4 January 2006.
:Firstly, please sign your posts (using four tildes, or the second last button above the editing box). If you wanted to rename the page, you should use the move function. Cut and paste moves are prohibited (except in rare circumstances) as they displace page histories (which, for legal reasons, is very bad). In any case, I disagree. This station is known in common parlance as Life FM. It is located at Life FM (Adelaide) per our disambiguation methods.--cj | talk 07:41, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: I have added a link to Channel 7 a television network in Australia.  Kathleen.wright5 22:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Link to Channel  7 

message: The reference for ownership is from supporter materials I was sent.  Kathleen.wright5 03:16, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to ownership of Life FM (5 Ram) 

message: The reference for First air date is at the Wikichristian article about Life FM.  Kathleen.wright5 07:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to First air date

message: Just added some references to give some validity to the page, as well as adding some history of the station and what another organisation has to say about it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkMatter046 (talk • contribs) 05:52, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of References
Talk:The News (Adelaide)

message: Did Murdoch fall foul of the cross media ownership laws? Ozdaren 10:36, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was the News sold? 

message: Who bough it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.84.151 (talk) 13:19, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...And who was it sold to?
Talk:Davy Rothbart

message: As far as I can see, the external link added by Missshmu was valid. It was a short article written by Rothbart on an advice website. I'm not quite sure why it was removed... Thanks.  whysanitynet 19:50, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it is valid, you can add back the external link into the article and explain on the talk page your reasons for doing this. --Siva1979Talk to me 19:53, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Driver

message: I found this info on the dab, didn't think it was useful:
"** on certain hunts, the dozens of natives who mainly use noise to drive the game to the (usually white or autochtonous noble) hunter, who is often mounted on horseback or elephant (as on tiger hunt)
** on a colonial plantation, (un-payed?) coloured assistant (sort of trustee) of a white overseer, e.g. about four times as many in British Jamaica, helping to whip his own kind into productivity and obedience
** A signal amplifier may be referred to as a driver.
** JDBC driver - a software that allows applications to connect to a database" 
--Commander Keane 05:40, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Other info

message: There are loads of people with Driver as the last name not listed here!
Please can someone list them!
:Please don't unless they are notable enough to have Wikipedia articles! Notinasnaid 21:49, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Name 

message: In business, the term Driver is used to describe something that causes or contributes to something else (e.g. a business driver used to strategy, a driver of demand, etc.). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.176.189.201 (talk) 20:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't doubt what you say. This page, however, is a disambiguation page. That means its content is driven (pun accidental) by the titles and content of existing Wikipedia articles. There aren't currently any articles called "business driver" or "demand driver", so there can't be references to them. There is Cost driver, which is a start. The way forward is to create the other articles, then the disambiguation page can certainly have links to them. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 21:35, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The term Driver is commonly used in the business world. 

message: I added the cleanup tag, and just came back to fix this DAB. As per my edit summary, I removed the silly number of partial matches clogging up this DAB. I see others have tried to remove these before and been reverted . Can we talk here if there is any difference of opinion of excluded items - in line with WP:MOSDAB. Widefox; talk 12:23, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  One of the most useless DABs I've seen - partial matches