lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Racket (sports equipment)

message: This is a really inadequate article. I was expecting Wikipedia to have several times as much information about tennis racquets alone. Honbicot 15:13, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Editing that you don't approve of is not vandalism, and it is rude and unconstructive to throw terms like that around. If you'd like to be civil, I'd be happy to discuss the thinking behind my edits. Pjbflynn 23:11, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I suggest you go back in the history and look at the state of the article before the changes I made. For an article named simply Racquet, it made no mention of any type of racquet other than tennis, and was basically a rambling mess. Perhaps Tennis racquet deserves it's own separate article, and I think that the much better content in the current tennis section is just about there now. Pjbflynn 01:18, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, it's obvious that all you want to do here is yell at me, rather than discussing content or for that matter, editing the article. Pjbflynn 15:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please expand

message: Thanks for adding back the details!  When you said badminton racquets often have "isometric" shapes, did you mean "asymmetric"?
LachlanA 06:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isometric? 

message: The entire text describing the details of tennis racquet selection was plagiarized from http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/LC/SelectingRacquet/SelectingRacquet.html.  I have deleted this portion of the article.  If someone wants to re-add the information without blatantly stealing the material, then go for it.  But until then, copied material has no place on Wikipedia.  Regards, Rahzel 05:08, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tennis Racquet section is plagiarized 

message: References missing! This article seems to be very correct, though... --Simenhjort 18:04, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Can mention be made of dampeners on modern tennis rackets ? GrahamHardy (talk) 08:10, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dampeners 

message: The BBC link has 'raquet', not racquet with a c, so doesn't support the current claim it's being used as a citation for. It's also racket throughout Wimbledon's site (and if anyone was going to know it would be them), the OED redirects to racket, -only noting 'racquets' under the entry for the game Rackets, as an alternative spelling used in North America.Frond Dishlock (talk) 22:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC link
Talk:Dicyclopentadiene

message: I am pretty sure that this compound is used as such as a monomer (cross linker?) in some polymerisation reactions, but I do not know the specifics .. can someone add that??
Just to add, density of dicyclopentadiene is 0.98 g cm-1 (source: http://www.inchem.org/documents/icsc/icsc/eics0873.htm) ... Also interesting is that this page is no where near as detailed as other page related to chemicals on wiki. - xg
:That's weird, the link you just provided states that this should be a solid at room temperature 83.116.34.233 13:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now corrected in the article.  --Ed (Edgar181) 14:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 300 liter escaped in  Wuppertal, Germany and 53 people were injured. . --Stone (talk) 16:34, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wuppertal, Germany

message: , I don't think it's true that "Hydrogenation of dicyclopentadiene gives TH-dimer" (as you wrote here). Eric Kvaalen (talk) 18:02, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I dont remember, but obviously I did.  Looks completely incorrect because where would the Me groups come from.  Checking my usual reference, Ullmann Encyclopedia states the following: "Hydrogenation of dicyclopentadiene and subsequent acid-catalyzed isomerization of the ensuing saturated product 24 has opened a facile synthetic route to adamantane 25."  24 is tetrahydrodicyclopentadiene, the expected product.  Thanks for correcting that dumb mistake.--Smokefoot (talk) 20:04, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: TH-dimer

message: Hello there, In the most recent edit of the article, this source seems to indicate that tetrahydrodicyclopentadiene is the jet fuel JP-10. -- Ktsquare (talk) 23:36, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  the most recent edit comes from this source
MediaWiki talk:Addedwatchtext

message: Due to bug phab:T153403, I've made an abrupt adjustment to this message.  Feel free to adjust as appropriate. — xaosflux Talk 06:28, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: that bug is won't fix - so basically plain text and html markup only here now.  If you have a better message, please propose below. — xaosflux Talk 20:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a big fan of making messages short. The default is currently ":$1" and its discussion page have been added to your watchlist. How about using the default, but just changing "discussion" to "talk"? (I suggest this because we change the default tab name of "Discussion" to "Talk" on enwiki.) So the message would be ":$1" and its talk page have been added to your watchlist. Let me know what you think. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 00:45, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Support I don't think we need to explain what a watchlist is anymore. — xaosflux Talk 01:00, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've gone ahead and changed it. People should feel free to revert if this change is not wanted. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 03:48, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

text: Support - a reasonable fix.  -FASTILY 07:58, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bug [[phab:T153403]]
Talk:List of Fordham University alumni

message: The biography page linked to Mary Jo Quinlan's name (Business) notes that she is an alumna of St. Josephs's in Philadelphia, not Fordham.--Shoreranger 15:14, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: She has a Fordham MBA too. --Mantanmoreland 15:31, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to CNN, he has a Fordham Law degree, but I'm waiting for consensus before adding him to the list. Thoughts? Wl219 21:12, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about that. This is a fairly minor arrest, isn't it? I don't think this makes him notable. I can see if he committed a major crime. Now that would be notable!--Mantanmoreland 21:40, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think murder counts as a major crime, no? Wl219 06:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jonathon Edington 
Talk:The Ghost Tower of Inverness

message: Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God got a 5.0 out of 10 on imdb; do you know how bad a movie has to be to get that? And how is this not trivial coverage. Quite frankly, you're grasping a straws. This is not notable. --Jack Merridew 14:57, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Notability has nothing to with quality. I grabbed the first thing I saw out of my library. At least I am doing research and not commenting on articles I know nothing about. Web Warlock (talk) 14:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  If I do not know enough about this subject it is due to the poor quality of the articles here. --Jack Merridew 15:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then you need to go beyond this site for more research and then bring it back here. Web Warlock (talk) 15:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

text: What does a bad ranking score on IMDB have to do with the notability of the article's subject? Blatant displays of contempt for the subject matter might cause someone to question whether these edits are being made from a neutral point of view. Rray (talk) 15:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *Why is this discussion being held here?  I'd suggest it be moved to the talk page of the movie rather than a module. Hobit (talk) 01:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dungeons & Dragons: Wrath of the Dragon God
Talk:Greyhawk Adventures

message: Hello Greyhawk fans. I have spent the better part of my day working on the Living Greyhawk Gazetteer article.  It occurs to me that it might better if it was merged into the World of Greyhawk Fantasy Game Setting.
I figure while I am at it I will also merge in Greyhawk Adventures, From the Ashes (Dungeons & Dragons) and Greyhawk: The Adventure Begins articles into the World of Greyhawk Fantasy Game Setting as well.
There is a method to my madness here.
By themselves these articles are lacking in sources that point to their notability, but together they present a much stronger article.  Plus each product is in a sense an update of the product before it. So there is the continuity in one article.  There is also precedent for this with the Player’s Handbook, all editions are in one article. Web Warlock (talk) 18:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposals
Talk:Spider behavior

message: * links to articles with interesting spider behavior (jumping spiders for example)
* general modes of behavior:
** web building
** "intelligence" in spiders
** hunting behavior
maybe categorize "behavioral types" of spiders. --Sarefo 15:51, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  sections 

message: Are there any sources on this? The arachnologist Rod Crawford states that in the case of black widows, at least, this is a myth: http://www.washington.edu/burkemuseum/spidermyth/myths/blackwidow.html
I'm inclined to believe that without any sources, this is another urban legend which has snuck its way into beliefs about spiders. Aurora Musis amica (talk) 13:00, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The female tends to eat the male." 

message: The opening paragraph states "They are the largest order of arachnids and rank seventh in total species diversity among all other groups of organismsSebastin, P.A. and Peter, K.V. (eds). (2009). Spiders of India. Universities Press/Orient Blackswan.  ....".  Is this really true - were plants, fungi, bacteria, etc. considered? Perhaps "organisms" should be "animals"?__DrChrissy (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  accuracy of leading statement
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy

message: There is currently a discussion at the talk page for the template  regarding a proposal to add an  parameter to the template. You are invited to review and join the discussion. Thank you.  — Archer1234 (t·c) 17:13, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to add an "eparchy" parameter to Infobox Christian leader 

message: An editor has requested that :Shrovetide be moved to :Pre-Lent, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You  are invited to participate in the move discussion. Graham (talk) 01:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Shrovetide#Requested move 5 February 2024]] 

message: I have nominated his passing for the main page at In the News Recent Deaths. Unfortunately, his article is not in good shape. Memory eternal. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:01, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patriarch Neophyte has reposed 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Tbilisi Spiritual Seminary#Requested move 15 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 21:21, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Tbilisi Spiritual Seminary#Requested move 15 April 2024]] 

message: I have tried to improve the verifiability of Orthodox Church in America Archdiocese of Canada but have reached the limit of my expertise (or lack thereof). I would appreciate anyone who has more experience with the OCA in improving this article. ThermoBoard (talk) 12:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improving Orthodox Church in America Archdiocese of Canada 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Russian Orthodoxy#Requested move 6 June 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.  ASUKITE 22:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Russian Orthodoxy#Requested move 6 June 2024]]
Talk:Land of a Thousand Dances

message: The Walker Brothers did a cover. Take It Easy with The Walker Brothers  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.57.184.105 (talk) 16:44, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: the lead needs a rewrite. IF these are notable covers, they need to be in the body not the lead, and expanded and referenced.--Egghead06 (talk) 23:50, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

text: The Walker Brothers' version was featured prominently in a key montage scene in the 2021 film "Last Night In Soho," directed by Edgar Wright.Maccb (talk) 13:42, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover versions

message: Couldn't you also call the Wilson Picket version an early form of proto-Funk? --80.187.106.89 (talk) 16:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly. If you can find a reliable source which discusses the record in those terms, it may be worth mentioning in the article; if you can find multiple reliable sources saying so, then definitely. But it's not our place as editors to draw our own conclusions about it and write those into the article. Brettalan (talk) 16:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proto-Funk 

message: The 45rpm records and most references seem to call it "Land of 1000 Dances", not "Land of a Thousand Dances".  Why is the Wikipedia article named differently?  Gnuish (talk) 08:06, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a fair point. The original Chris Kenner version as well as the Cannibal and Pickett hit versions all use the numerals. That seems pretty definitive to me. I think I'd be in favor of renaming if no one has a good reason not to. Brettalan (talk) 12:53, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song name? 

message: 16 is a far cry from 1000.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.112.55.242 (talk) 16:18, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  False advertising 

message: The article mentions that the original lyrics references the Boogaloo as one of the dances, but the original lyrics (or at least this version, which appears to be the original version by Chris Kenner) doesn't mention it.  It does, however, say "I like it like that", which I understand is the name of a famous boogaloo song (although I believe it postdates this song).  If this is the reference the article refers to, maybe it would be worth clarifying it. —Cousteau (talk) 11:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No mention of "boogaloo" in the more famous Wilson Pickett version, either. Good catch; I've removed that. Brettalan (talk) 04:16, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boogaloo?
Talk:Heironeous

message: Can I get a citation for the claim about Arnd of Tdon? 75.128.143.234 19:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that's from Gary Holian's Dungeon #104 article on the Paladins of Greyhawk.--Robbstrd 19:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Arnd of Tdon

message: Place unformatted & incomplete refs here.--Robbstrd 20:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incomplete references

message: Where is this information (Knights of the Chalice), Savnok, etc from? The Pramas articles?--Robbstrd 20:38, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Myth & legends section
Talk:Blackbeard pirates

message: Important note: this page is work in progress.  I'm trying to set up this page and its sister pages, bare with me until they are completed.  In the meantime, I'd appricate any help anyone can provide.  Angel Emfrbl 15:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page not complete

message: Here is a list of pirates Oda "may" have used to base the crewmembers' names on. This list not only notes those in the aritcle but also those not mentioned in it already. I also included some tidbits on some of the pirates since I can't seem to find them in wikipedia. Hope this helps out.--CalicoD.Sparrow 09:54, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Inspirations 

message: Not unlike is a slang word? It appears here and on other One Piece articles. Should it be changed/removed? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 85.76.254.243 (talk) 17:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not unlike 

message: Although he is seen running swiftly away from Ace in the manga, the recent anime episode made a point of how both Doc Q and Stronger were too weak to get away from Ace - having to be dragged away by Burgess instead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.59.155 (talk) 20:26, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A note on Doc Q 

message: i really like this comic and i think its pretty awesome!! dont yall?!?!?  --I Couldnt Think! 20:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I like this comic 

message: Okay... Preparing pages right now for reworking and stuff. Problem with Blackbeard page: Once you remove the "fancruft" there is nothing left.  Maybe someone else can make it work, if YOU can then feel free to unmerge; I won't stop you at all.  What I don't want to see is that same layoutted page being left intact I note.  We're trying to save pages right now.  Angel Emfrbl (talk) 17:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reason for Merge
Talk:Black Cat pirates

message: Important note: this page is work in progress.  I'm trying to set up this page and its sister pages, bare with me until they are completed.  In the meantime, I'd appricate any help anyone can provide.  Angel Emfrbl 15:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page not complete

message: Can someone please tell me where this "Yainu" person, listed as a shipwright, is mentioned? I've never heard of him before. Sigmasonic X 22:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Me neither.  Outside the main four members I didn't know the others had been given names.Angel Emfrbl 20:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay, added him back in, with a short description. He's the guy that Jango hypnotised to belive he was Kuro, and that Morgan arrested, thinking he was Kuro. His name is given in the One Piece Blue book, and it also mentions that he was the shipwright. Murasaki Seiko 05:01, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you at last!!! I better add a reference for the sake of future arguments. Seriously... We have GOT to get into the habbit of referencing stuff like this otherwise it makes things x2 as hard to confirm such things.  Angel Emfrbl 07:59, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crew Information 

message: I suggest that we officialy use "Jango" when refering to the character, as opposed to "Django".
In addition to Jango fitting the Katakana better (ジャンゴ, Jango), Jango is also more popular of a term:
Google search: 
Jango "One Piece": 57,600 hits
Django "One Piece": 46,500 hits
deviantART search: 
Jango "One Piece": 112 hits 
Django "One Piece": 19 hits 
This fits the criteria, does it not?
:That's pretty fair of an assessment. To further support that spelling, the author has written the name in Roman characters on his wanted poster, and the spelling he used was indeed "JANGO". --Julian Grybowski 17:11, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, forgot that one. (Justyn 18:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Django-->Jango

message: Why couldn't he have his own page? 80.164.128.2 20:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why bother when a character can be completely summed up in two paragraphs.  Really... See the main One Piece talk page for more details on this. Angel Emfrbl 21:27, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captain Kuro
Talk:Bellamy Pirates

message: Important note: this page is work in progress.  I'm trying to set up this page and its sister pages, bare with me until they are completed.  In the meantime, I'd appricate any help anyone can provide.  Angel Emfrbl 15:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page not complete

message: Sorry guys... I don't have the pictures to supply this page.  Does anyone else have them.  :/ Angel Emfrbl 07:44, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No pictures
Talk:Buggy's Band of Pirates

message: Important note: this page is work in progress.  I'm trying to set up this page and its sister pages, bare with me until they are completed.  In the meantime, I'd appricate any help anyone can provide.  Angel Emfrbl 15:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page not complete

message: As of July 31, 2006, this page is being used to test a new format where all of the crewmembers bios are listed here as opposed to the One Piece minor characters page. Tell us if you think it works. If it does, it will be applied to the other crews. Sigmasonic X 07:46, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It works ;) Angel Emfrbl 09:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format Test 

message: Show me proof that the crewmembers I've removed today are offical.  SBS... Manga chapter... I don't care.  Show me it! Angel Emfrbl 10:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Show me proof!
Talk:Howl from the North

message: The real cover artist is Glen Orbik - Jeff Starlind is credited as the cover artist within the module, but this was a mistake and the signature on the cover painting is plainly Glen Orbik's (also it appears in the fantasy section of Glen's website).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danull (talk • contribs) 22:52, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artist
Talk:Don Krieg's Pirate Armada

message: Important note: this page is work in progress.  I'm trying to set up this page and its sister pages, bare with me until they are completed.  In the meantime, I'd appricate any help anyone can provide.  Angel Emfrbl 15:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page not complete

message: I just removed some unproven crewmembers. You want them kept then will someone please show me where their names are written and I'll add them back.  Angel Emfrbl 10:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ideaman, Hussle, and Kagikko are all mentioned in One Piece Blue, actually. Murasaki Seiko 05:13, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes but where on this page does it say that??? Come on.  Unless you've read that book you won't know. Next time, lets add that little note that they come from the Red/Blue data books.  ;) Angel Emfrbl 15:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proof of crew
Talk:Pittiplatsch

message: Because of the rules of the GNU-FDL, I have to say that the article is mostly a translation of the German article. But it would be really nice if somebody with better English knowledge could keep an eye on the grammer and spelling of the article, because English isn't my native language! :-) --Grandy02 15:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation of German article [[de:Pittiplatsch und Schnatterinchen]]
Talk:Iggwilv

message: The content of this article is written as if fictional aspects of the character were true. I have tagged the offending sections with the "Fact" cleanup template. --Gavin Collins (talk) 10:33, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is some of the laziest editing I have seen here in a long time. Do you rely on others to do everything in other aspects of your life as well? Web Warlock (talk) 12:15, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If I was to edit this article, I sure you would simply revert it, as you have done with my edits on several occasions. I am not interested in an edit war.--Gavin Collins (talk) 12:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: In universe perspective

message: I note that the in universe content of the Description, Relationships and History sections is being augumented by citations from various sources. However, this content fails WP:WAF, so I am not sure why this is being done, and what it is trying to achieve. --Gavin Collins (talk) 18:57, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's see, you are failing to understand something here.  Ok, how is this different than any other day of the week? Web Warlock (talk) 19:06, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

text: What, specifically, fails which part(s) of WP:WAF? SamBC(talk) 15:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations supporting in universe perspective