Talk:Balatarin

message: I didn't quite understand the meaning of this senstence: 
Sometimes users complaining Balatarin managers for administrating "Abuse Reports".
It's Baladar's job to administer abuse reports. Did you mean they sometimes don't respond to abuse reports as reporters hoped? In that case, please write it under "criticism." Dochar (talk) 16:38, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Abuse Report

message: Virtually any wikipedia entry for any service or product has a mention of competitors or alternatives.  This entry even mentions that there has been criticism of balatarin and such.  It is only fitting that an alternative out there is mentioned.  not advertised, simply mentioned for the sake of getting that important fact out there (that balatarin is not the only persian version of digg) and perhaps open the door to comparison
:ّAs you obviously know, diggeh is not even a known website, leave alone being a "leading competitor." And it is advertising. Dochar 17:13, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How can diggeh be the "leading" competitor, when it is so young? Then what about plak or others? How do you say diggeh is the "leading" competitor? Any references for that? As you might know, Wikipedia only welcomes objective views. The fact that Diggeh is yours doesn't make it "leading". Moreover, balatarin is not a mere Persian digg. The only common thing between these two is that they both gather links; how they do it is absolutely different. The concept of energy, negative votes, and hot topics are just some of the new ideas in Balatarin. Dochar 18:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Do you even read what I write? I said what about plak, aftab, and other balatarin-likes? diggeh is not the only one, you just don't know about the other websites. And a question. Do they cite Microsoft Office's competitors on it's Wikipedia page, the way you advertised your website (devoting a whole section, with a single line, to brag about your product). The correct way is to add a link to diggeh.com's Wikipedia page in "See Also" section. Why don't you do that? Write an article on diggeh.com and your link would be absolutely welcome. Please respect Wikipedia's integrity. Dochar 07:32, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I would take your no-response as your contest to removal of the added section. Dochar 19:48, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

text: [Plak http://itblog.blogfa.com/post-191.aspx], [Oyax http://www.oyax.com], and Alef, which I cannot find its link. In any case, a one-line description doesn't qualify for a whole new section. As I said, you can add it in the "See Also" part. Also, please take a look at Microsoft Office's article and see if they devote one whole section to their competitors. As you you, this distracts the reader from the main focus of the article. The article about Balatarin is to talk about Balatarin. Please do read what I said before.  Dochar 17:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Diggeh

message: * live page
* filtering and new addresses 
* newly published regulations
* updating logo and screenshots
::I've updated the article to reflect the above (plus many more) Dochar 00:33, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TODO

message: I removed a claim from the article stating that Balatarin is the first Web 2.0 Persian website. It definitely is not. Wikis are among Web 2.0 web sites (see Web 2.0) and Persian Wikipedia was founded years before Balatarin existed (let alone other Persian Web 2.0 websites). huji—TALK 19:22, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Web 2.0 Persian website 

message: I don't think this article meets Wikipedia notability guidelines for Web content 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(web)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSD#A7 
By the way, I don't think 7-sang should be considered a "well-known" and significant award as mentioned in notability guidelines. It is not significant enough to have its own Wikipedia entry; how come they can issue an award to confirm notability of another Web site?
79.127.24.194 (talk) 19:57, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability Guidelines 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Balatarin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080316232200/http://blog.balatarin.com:80/?p=70 to http://blog.balatarin.com/?p=70
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:05, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified