lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Georg August Schweinfurth

message: "English edition, The Heart of Africa, 1873"... Should be 1874? Any verificaiton it was published before the "Im Herzen von Afrika, Leipzig, 1874"?Connection (talk) 11:51, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expedition Docs: Minor Correction 

message: Someone needs to verify and reconcile the birth and death dates in the article and under the picture.  The dates under the picture appear to be incorrect and possibly vandalized.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.225.125.28 (talk) 21:35, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth and Death date 
Talk:Ten Martyrs

message: This entry needs to be re-written. It reads like some of the Vatican-originated articles on saints.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.129.119.92 (talk) 00:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objectivity 

message: The martyrs phrase in the title has POV problem.Saff V. (talk) 11:23, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: this needs to be clarified; explained if it is a thing, or given actual dates.  The article does not seem to dwell on historical details. --142.163.194.244 (talk) 20:36, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "era of the Mishnah" 

message: This article is about rabbis martyred under emperor Hadrian's reign (117-138).  However, it refers erroneously to the aftermath of the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 CE, at the end of the First Jewish–Roman War, whereas it should refer to the Bar Kokhba revolt (i.e. the Second Jewish–Roman War) in 132–136 CE, precisely when Hadrian was emperor.
JPK1959 (talk) 21:41, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical issue
Talk:Lars Levi Laestadius

message: Laestadius had only very little Sámi blood. That he should have claimed Sámi ethnicity is not shown in any of the biographies that I have read (I'm currently rewriting the article on Swedish Wikipedia). I will remove the Sámi label from the box.--Skogsfrun (talk) 12:26, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: According to information I've collected, he was half Sami and closely identified as Sami, personally and culturally (and not only rel his ministry).  This is according to Laestadius scholar Professor Juha Pentikainen--especially page 24 of the Fragments of Lappish Mythology English translation.  Also, the Sapmi website identifies him as Sami.  If someone has valid citable source material that he was not Sami or only marginally Sami, please provide those sources.  If in Swedish or some other non-English language, please provide the original text citation, and if you would like to, an English translation as per Wikipedia:Verifiability#Non-English sources.  I am going to change his ethnicity back to Swedish - Sami as per the above sources, and I will cite those in the infobox. Regards, Paavo273 (talk) 01:05, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The one who makes a claim is the one who has to prove it. From reasonably new and mainstream research into the subject concerned (not remarks in research on other subjects), preferably more than one source, referred in footnotes. 151.177.57.131 (talk) 21:07, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

text: To be a little more specific: ancestry (or even emotional attachment if proven) is not the same as identity (either self-defined, in the modern way, or as defined by others, which was the way of Laestadius' time and long after). 151.177.57.131 (talk) 15:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have ANY valid source contradicting the scholarly sourceS cited, provide them here.  Deleting valid scholar-sourced info without better sources amounts to vandalism or something akin to it. Paavo273 — Preceding undated comment added 04:08, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sámi etnicity 
Talk:Peter Forsskål

message: I'm not sure of where it suits best to put in the link to swedish wikisource Facsimile text 1759, because the the new book from 2009 about the text is of course of interest too. That's the link in reference 1 here. --IP7869 (talk) 06:08, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be placed in an "External links" section at the bottom of the article, while the new book, if it has got a good introduction that could be a source for the claim that the book was banned, could be the inline citation. Just a suggestion, you are correct in that both links are relevant for the article. --Saddhiyama (talk) 09:10, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The text link to swedish src
Talk:National Anti-Vivisection Society

message: The middle section needs to be removed and is an advert for NAVS beliefs, without ANY references whatsoever. Much of this should be in the animal testing article (except it's unverified, one-sided and actually shouldn't be).
London prophet (talk) 10:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Whilst I agree that this article certainly needs more primary sources and citations, I'm not particularly convinced about the supposed lack of neutrality. The general discussion about animal testing is made with reference to the NAVS's direct involvement in these issues, and is therefore of interest. Although some aspects of that discussion do not directly relate to NAVS and may well be duplicated elsewhere, it would be difficult for readers to follow the historical context if these sections were omitted completely. As the original neutrality dispute was raised some time ago, does this page still represent an "advert for NAVS beliefs" as suggested? N Withnall (talk) 11:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

text: I've now started rewriting some of the main sections to address the impartiality issues; certain parts of the original text appear to have been copy-and-pasted from the NAVS web site so there was inevitably going to be some bias with that approach, but this doesn't necessarily invalidate the points that are being made. N Withnall (talk) 22:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Between Raising Hell and Amazing Grace

message: A) Should the songwriters' full names be listed, and B) since Kenny Alphin is credited as "Big Kenny" in the liner notes, should he be listed as such? Spell4yr 03:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Songwriters
Talk:Beyond Warped Live Music Series

message: Perhaps this page needs a more specific name, since "Beyond Warped Live Music Series" is not just an album by Guttermouth, but a full series of albums by various artists including: The Skulls, Side Sixty Seven, Lennon, Pulley, The Phenomenauts, Duanne Peters & The Hunns, Blackfire, and Dr. Neptune. All of which have albums released in 2005 or 2006 with that same album title.
Perhaps "Beyond Warped Live Music Series (Guttermouth Album)"? 2601:602:C800:7F50:2856:712B:83B3:65A9 (talk) 16:31, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming page?
Talk:James Hall (paleontologist)

message: If it is possible, can we change the title to include geology? Buscus 3 (talk) 05:36, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:   Title 

message: Come on, guys!! First man ever to talk about the concept of geosynclines... a theory that ruled geology for decades!! and it's not mentioned...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.130.98.26 (talk) 07:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:   Geosyncline 
Talk:Big Iron World

message: The two other OCMS albums have the writing credits listed - could someone kindly add that to this article, in the same format?  See Tennessee Pusher and Old Crow Medicine Show (album) for reference.  ClovisPt (talk) 05:37, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to the editor that took care of this.  ClovisPt (talk) 18:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song writing credits
Talk:Aril

message: The lycee fruit is offered at Lollicup (supplier of blended beverage's, coffee's, and tea's) in the form of the Lychee Slush, Lychee Jelly Milk Tea, and Lychee Tea.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.29.65.31 (talk) 00:07, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: So arils may form a false fruit like a yew berry (is it a berry?), but what makes that different to a true fruit like an apple or a plum?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.3.104.181 (talk) 20:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is a false fruit different to a true fruit? 

message: The following images were included on the article, but together did not form a cohesive gallery of the type expected by WP:IG. Galleries are not to be used to cram additional indiscriminate images into the article such that they only serve as more examples of the article subject without a reason to be in the gallery, such as direct compare & contrast or as an ordered series, e.g. lifestages of an organism. So per the advice in the image use policy pages, I have queued the images here until the article is expanded to support more images. Rkitko (talk) 04:04, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture gallery 

message: Both articles mention pomegranate as example of fruit containing the respective organ-part. Which is true? Or are both the same thing ? Kembangraps (talk) 09:09, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they are different. I've just added a citation to sarcotesta. That is derived from the integuments of the seed, whereas an aril is derived from the funiculus. An aril can in some cases completely cover the seed, but usually is more like a cup or a blob projecting to the side. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 17:56, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aril = sarcotesta ? 
Talk:Walter Lincoln Hawkins

message: Walter is a great scientist  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sks161 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: hi 100.1.127.77 (talk) 15:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi 

message: Walter is awesome, but it's kind of sad to see that there is such little info on this page. Please step your game. I'll try to help too!       SchmidtBoiy (talk) 00:00, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi also
Talk:Production of the James Bond films

message: I'm seeing references around the news sites to Linus Sandgren being hired for Bond 25, but so far it's all "may be" and "possibly". So it's not confirmed yet, basically a rumor. All of it seems to come from a single Tweet. I think we have to hold off until we have a reliable source saying it's a done deal. -- Doctorx0079 (talk) 15:25, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:CRYSTAL it should not be added until there is some kind of confirmation. Betty Logan (talk) 15:40, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linus Sandgren not yet confirmed for Bond 25 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Property of a Lady (film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 9#Property of a Lady (film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  pbp 19:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Property of a Lady (film)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :The Property of a Lady (film). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 9#The Property of a Lady (film) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 21:43, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Property of a Lady (film)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:BigBigLove

message: Seriously, the paragraph
The album showcases the band’s sweeping musical range... from the irresistible melodies of the first single Beautiful To Me through the moody epic Message To God. Edgy live favourite Excited contrasts dramatically with the fragile beauty of Close To You. And there’s a powerful re-recording of Relapse.
reads so much like a press release it's not funny... --Anothermelbournite 05:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like a press release... 
Talk:Bilo jednom u Hrvatskoj

message: ...It is a Progressive /Rock Opera album!
The songs are longer that usual,and are linked toghether to form a Coerent dramatic structure:
Overture/Pocetak,
 
Player's entry/ Dolazak Hrvata, Drama dialogue/Duh ratnika, Fabula (fable)/Diva Grabovceva, 
Intermezzo: Dedication of album/ Moj dida i ja, Political theme/Neka nit'ko ne dira u moj mali dio svemira!
Love theme/Lipa Kajo
Climax/Kletva Kralja Zvonimira,  Λυόσις/Ratnici Svijetla
Departure: Death theme/Dan Dolazi, Drama end/ Tamo gdje su moj korjeni , Testament/Sine moj.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcellogo (talk • contribs) 13:08, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finally,someone noticed that ... 

message: I tried to fix some of the spelling and obvious problems I saw but I didn't want to take out any meaning or content so if someone has more of a background and wants to contribute it would be appreciated! Coralshin (talk) 22:07, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Creation Destruction

message: User:Creation_Destruction
run at Thu Mar 8 22:54:51 2007 GMT
Mainspace	14
Talk:	5
User talk:	10
User:	246
Wikipedia:	9
avg edits per article	12.91
earliest	21:11, 7 March 2007
number of unique pages	22
total	284
2007/3 	284 	
Source - Anas Talk? 22:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Agathis macrophylla

message: Erased statement
 A. vitiensis is a synonym according to some, a seperate species according to others.
Maybe the latter part of above statement is not true any more according to the latest botanical studies, but I am not a botanist. I do know however that there are not so old works which threat the two (vitiensis and macrophylla) as very distinct.
So some words about this should return to the article. --Tauʻolunga 06:38, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So isn't that already covered because it is already mentioned in the taxobox, along with another synonym, and there are plenty of species where multiple names occur in various sources. The IUCN calls vitiensis a synonym of macrophylla, as does GRIN. But if some sources are still using the old names, fair enough Kahuroa 07:48, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure you get my point. To me a synonym means: 1 species, 2 names. But 'v' and 'm' are seen as 2 distinct species by some. --Tauʻolunga 05:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Synonym' seems to cover both the situations you mention. Can you tell us more about who said it and when? Kahuroa 06:35, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

text: For example: Multipurpose trees for agroforestry in the Pacific islands; R.R. Thaman, C.R. Elevitch, K.M. Wilkinson (http://www.agroforestry.net/pubs/Multspec.pdf) --Tauʻolunga 07:28, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's dated 2000 - and I note that Elevitch is one of the authors. The same man in 2006 is an editor of The Lex Thompson source listed in the references of this article, so that suggests he has changed his mind between 2000 and 2006, and now includes v in m. Kahuroa 07:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. --Tauʻolunga 07:48, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''A. vitiensis'' is a synonym ? 
Talk:James Hendler

message: I was asked to look at the various ((citation needed}} tags on this article and help provide them -- I understand the policies, but am not sure how best to respond.  The claim that I am one of the originators of the Semantic Web is validated by the text below (cf the work at DARPA) and the Semantic Web paper - which I have added to the references in response to the citation needed at the end of the article.  The claim that I am a Fellow of the various societies is validated on their lists of fellows, but I do not know how to reference these as they are not actually articles and are not covered in the how to cite discussion -- but the claims are easily verifiable, so I would postulate that a citation is not needed for those.  I hope this provides background on the needed verifiability of the claims in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JAHendler (talk • contribs) 23:21, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of artworks known in English by a foreign title

message: I hope you like my list. Rothorpe 23:00, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I've adopted strict Romance lower case (if they taught me that at school I wasn't listening). Perhaps Le Grand Meaulnes should be dragged to the front, à la Irma la Douce? And what about the classics? Aeneid, Anabasis? Rothorpe (talk) 23:52, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What are the criteria? We have about 200 Bach cantatas, several Wagner operas, all these Latin liturgical names (Magnificat, Nunc dimittis) ... - I didn't know this list, came for a French title that we don't need to spell differently than the French (I hope). - We don't normally take "la" and "der" for sorting. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria for inclusion
Talk:Juniperus ashei

message: I've also heard this called 'Texas Cedar' Should that be added to the list of names? 2001:1970:4000:D4:C906:45C2:74D:80BD (talk) 23:29, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've also come across this name: Texas cedarwood oil comes from Juniperus mexicana.2A02:1812:1126:5D00:241B:67F1:1FED:A025 (talk) 15:33, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Texas cedar
Talk:Thuja occidentalis

message: There is no "one" article to support Thujas use in several remedies to remove skin tags. Any one company is not going to mention competitive products. The NIH lists at least 3 thuja products here specifically to remove skin tags: http://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/search.cfm?startswith=THUJA+OCCIDENTALIS&x=13&y=17&labeltype=human Is that a good enough reference to revert and include the statement?Sedimentary (talk) 17:44, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are all homeopathic nonsense. See the warning NIH uses when you click on each one. Since the discussion above back in 2008/2009, the Wikipedia community has thought long and hard about how to represent medical information on the site. To that end, see the guidelines on reliable sources for medical content. If readers turn to an encyclopedia and receive information, we better be certain it's correct when it comes to medical topics. The consensus since this earlier conversation is that homeopathy is WP:FRINGE and mention of a use (all the products I've seen for skin tag removal that include this plant are homeopathic) would provide them undue weight in covering the topic of this article. The NIH database wouldn't suffice to meet WP:MEDRS anyway. Rkitko (talk) 22:35, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use to remove skin tags 

message: I think at least some of the images that you removed in  were fine as far as the policy on galleries is concerned. It warns against indiscriminate collections of images, images that basically illustrate the same thing and do not add to understanding of the article's subject. Images of cultivars are fine by this criterion. And so are photos of various parts of the tree at different stages of development, like the mature seed cones and the leaves. They do add to the understanding of what the tree looks like. They also maybe give indications of things that the article ought to be expanded to describe. So, I would like to restore some of the images that you removed. — Eru·tuon 18:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the policy states "a gallery section may be appropriate in some Wikipedia articles if a collection of images can illustrate aspects of a subject that cannot be easily or adequately described by text or individual images". I think that different stages of development can be shown with individual images and text. If you'd like to restore the cultivar gallery, I would not object. (See, e.g., gallery of species in Marmota). —hike395 (talk) 14:45, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: There is no link to Techny, Illinois when one puts "Techny" in the Wikipedia search but rather just to this section. Perhaps someone knows how to update this?
: This has been done. Regards, Darorcilmir (talk) 15:56, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Techny, Illinois reference
Talk:Langdon Winner

message: This entire section is completely unclear and needs to be rewritten. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 22:27, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "technology and politics" unclear 

message: Hello,
7 August 1944 is given as birth date, but without a source. I did not find this date in the listed web links. I'm interested because I would like to add the date to the German WP article but only with a source. I ping  who added the date in 2016. I hope pinging is conform to en.WP rules.
Best wishes, Leserättin (talk) 05:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the date, because it was already in the infobox. GoodDay (talk) 13:29, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for the response. Leserättin (talk) 06:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for birth date
Talk:Taxodium ascendens

message: The Senator (tree) was an exceptionally old tree of this species. Along with possible mention of this specific tree, a note about the very low level of senescence for this organism is worth mentioning on this species page. 7yl4r (talk) 01:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  mention of The Senator should be added 

message: — Assignment last updated by Isoetid (talk) 18:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Dendrology BIOL 3509

message: Final edits were made to this article for a project in Dendrology 3509 Amgehron19 (talk) 17:23, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dendrology BIOL 3509 Final Project Edits
Talk:Taxodium mucronatum

message: The Text says T. mucronatum is very drought-tolerant, but how can it be with a tree that needs much water. It should occur along rivers or swamps or so. If there's no rain than ground water flow must occur.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.48.40.106 (talk) 22:37, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Leik Myrabo

message: The article says "Professor Myrabo first had the idea for laser-propelled Lightcraft 10 years ago", but then states that " Lightcraft were limited to paper studies until about 1996".  Given that that's 11 years ago, one of these statements has an error in it.  My guess is that the first sentence needs to be changed to have an absolute date instead of a relative one.  Anyone have more info? -Athaler 16:58, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Xanthocyparis

message: This article needs some major clarification on the nomenclatural problem of Xanthocyparis vs. Callitropsis.  If I'm understanding the situation correctly (strictly from external sources, as it's not at all clear from this article), the problem is that the authors of Xanthocyparis circumscribed it to include the [lecto]type species of an earlier validly published genus, Callitropsis (i.e., C. nootkatensis)--and according to Tropicos, at least, the lectotypification was published in 1979 in a not-so-obscure publication so it was a rather egregious error.  This therefore makes Xanthocyparis a nomenclatural synonym of Callitropsis, plain and simple (at least as long as vietnamensis & nootkatensis are considered congeneric).  Quite regardless of when the combination Callitropsis nootkatensis was made (in 1944 by Florin, according to Tropicos, apparently because Oersted did not explicitly associate the epithet with the generic name, as required under Art. 33.1 of the ICBN although I have not been able to verify the Florin combination) the issue is that it is the type species of Callitropsis.  Is that what's going on here?
As an aside, I'm not sure what hope there is of conserving the name Xanthocyparis, especially now that the name Callitropsis has been taken up by Little et al. and several additional species transferred into it.  MrDarwin (talk) 16:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomenclature

message: A prior version of Xanthocyparis, that was at that title before I moved the old "Callitropsis" article to cover it, can now be found here. --Stemonitis (talk) 12:21, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Prior version archived

message: It seems now to have been decided that the genus is monotypic, so according to WP:MONOTYPICFLORA, I've merged the information at the species article, Xanthocyparis vietnamensis, here and made it a redirect. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:16, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Monotypic