lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Landmass

message: Is "landmass" correct or should it be "land mass"? Or are both correct with different meanings, ie, "a landmass", but "the land mass of" (which may include discontinuous pieces of land)? Nurg 23:04, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I aree. This page should be separated into "landmass" and "land mass" (as described by Nurg). --Adam (Talk) 22:35, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After searching, I could not find any meaningful difference between the two spellings. Generally dictionary entries say they are alternate spellings of the same word. OvertAnalyzer (talk) 22:54, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Landmass or Land mass

message: After extensive searching, I cannot find any reason for a separate Wikipedia article for "Landmass". It is simply a word that refers to any "... large area of land", per Merriam-Webster. Contrary to what is stated in the article, a landmass does not have to be surrounded by water. The only reference in the article does not even provide a definition for the term. I propose this article be changed to a disambiguation page, and direct to the album or the Glossary of geography terms. If I do not hear from anyone regarding the matter, I will make the change. OvertAnalyzer (talk) 23:32, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Convert to Disambiguation Page?

message: What are the two main land masses 207.204.103.91 (talk) 12:30, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social studies
Talk:Bamenda

message: The reference to Ring Road is redirected to Beltway. How can this be avoided. In Cameroon, the term Ring Road referes specifically to the Bamenda Ring Road. There should be a page in between were one can choose between the two meanings of the term. How can such a page be created? Or can the link be modified in a way so that from here it is redirected to an article "Bamenda Ring Road"? Nannus 23:08, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What you're referring to is a disambiguation page. I'll go ahead and create one to distinguish between the Cameroon ring road and beltway. — BrianSmithson 02:34, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for showing me how to do this! I've  joined Wikipedia just a few days ago so there is still a lot of stuff I got to learn.Nannus 19:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Should not the Nso be named in this article? See Phyllis Kaberry too, please? --Dia^ (talk) 21:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe. Why do you think they should be mentioned? — Dulcem (talk) 22:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Kaberry moved back to London, and eventually received a request from the Colonial Social Science Research Council to do research in the Bamenda region of Cameroon. The Council questioned the low development and malnutrition in this colonized region and requested Kaberry’s anthropological services. Funded by the British government, Kaberry travelled to Bamenda, living among the Nso’ (from Phyllis Kaberry article.) Would be interesting to know if and how the existence of this people in the area was/is. Apparently the fact that were studied by this anthropologist has several consequences in other studies.  --Dia^ (talk) 22:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Bamenda region" is pretty vague, though. Any anthropologist working in the Northwest Province could be stationed in Bamenda. It seems (at least from this article) that Bamenda is hisorically a center of the Mankon people. According to Ethnologue, the Nso seem to be situated northeast of Bamenda proper. — Dulcem (talk) 00:07, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nso

message: The article contains a photo of a bench. The caption says, "Sam Joe's Bushes". If this is correct, it needs more explanation. If this is an error, it should be corrected.Pete unseth (talk) 19:02, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Same Joe's Bushes"?
Talk:Spiral (TV series)

message: I've just been watching Series 1 on DVD and Gilou is referred to by Berthaud as "Gilles Lemaire", not "Gilles Escoffier". I have also googled and found references to his name in French articles about the series as Gilles Lemaire. Does his name change in later episodes?
SuzieWithers (talk) 15:24, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gilou's real name 

message: The infobox and IMDB say episode length is 52 min. This is somewhat misleading. The US Region 1 DVD for S05 is labeled 633 min for 12 eps, which averages 53 min per ep. But each ep is a different length, varying from #501 56min to #511 45min.-71.174.185.30 (talk) 14:15, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  episode length varies from 52min 

message: This has been announced eg  - and S7 finished with 'various plot hooks' for the main characters.
Was Roban's S7 investigation into the anaesthesia incident resolved? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 18:14, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Series 8 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:French_crime_drama_television_series  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.245.17.105 (talk) 16:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  spiral should be added here
Talk:New Right (Netherlands)

message: There has been some controversy on the following section. 
Like other nationalist parties, the party is accused of racism and neo-fascism. The party itself rejects this label, however, in 2004, a photograph surfaced of Smit meeting with friends while a White Power flag is clearly present in the room. Another picture taken at the same party shows a Nazi-helmet, including a Swastika symbol.  . The party itself rejects this label.
I don't think it is unencyclopedic because it violates WP:NOR. -- C mon 23:12, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The implication that is made here is incorrect: it does not follow from this photograph that New Right has a neo-Nazi ideology. So instead, you need to find someone who does make this implication, someone who says "A implies B," and insert it then in a critism section on the New Right. Intangible 23:29, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 17:05, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 
Talk:Curtis (Curtis Mayfield album)

message: It's just a jumble of the musicians mentioned in the article when it comes to who performed on the album, without saying who played what (e.g. the bongos in Move on Up). Does anyone know?--Lewi6400youtubeChannel (talk) 17:47, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musicians 

message: I just saw on discogs, that his debut album has the same line-up as The Impressions' Check Out Your Mind! of the same year. Both written and produced by Mayfield. Maybe he recorded and produced them together (the costs alone for studio and 20 musicians!) Does anyone know?
The stated difference between the Impressions and his own music should be reconsidered.
https://www.discogs.com/de/Curtis-Mayfield-Curtis/release/9965228
https://www.discogs.com/de/The-Impressions-Check-Out-Your-Mind/release/1334667
MenkinAlRire 21:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone with some knowledge?
Talk:Reverend Henry Kane

message: I just want to say that the second piece of trivia is something I heard in the E! Hollywood True Story episode "The Curse of Poltergeist".--JFP 23:15, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Not sure where/how to incorporate into the article, but they made a replica of the character that is available at various online venues.  Does anyone know if Fangoria or some other magazine has reviewed this product?  Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 23:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replica 

message: I think the Webster's ref is citing wikipedia. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 07:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref
Talk:Unchained (film)

message: The article contains two contrary statements in a row:
: … is believed to be in the public domain as the copyright has expired. Though the copyright expired many years earlier, it was renewed …
Both statements can't be true. I'm going with the first one unless someone comes up with further evidence.
--UnicornTapestry (talk) 16:55, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement conflict
Talk:Tarek Fatah

message: Its not clear whether he was Pakistani anymore since his pakistani citizenship was not valid. Maybe if the page changes "pakistani canadian" to "pakistan born Canadian", that would be better choice of words. 182.177.188.88 (talk) 23:56, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . "Pakistani-Canadian" means Pakistani origin Canadian. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was he still a Pakistani?
Talk:Combat de Reines

message: There is a very similar tradition of bullfighting in Japan. I remember it being mentionned in Will Ferguson's Hitching Rides with Buddha,which i am currently reading. A quick googlesearch digs up this, amongst others. Circeus 23:29, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So it would appear that Japanese bullfighting is between two bulls and is known as "Togyu" (though my Japanese is non-existant).  It's almost half way between cow fighting and bullfighting - it's certainly more aggressive than the former!  Certainly deserving of an article, and one may exist at JAwiki.  violet/riga (t) 09:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Japan

message: Saying that cows "refuse" to do something is sort of anthropomorphic, isn't it?
*No, cows have a free will, so they can easily refuse to do something. Refusal is not just a human characteristic. - Mgm|(talk) 09:31, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  refusal? 

message: It's more a canton-valais than a swiss tradition it doesn't exist in the rest of switzerland. --217.162.144.131
: Not totally true, there are some fightings (ok, by far less than in VS) in VD. 85.2.111.125 (talk) 22:54, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Valais
Talk:Cute Without the 'E' (Cut from the Team)

message: can someone put in the billboard chart ratings? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Theniel (talk • contribs) . --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 23:42, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I fail to see how this "meaning" of the song is NPOV. To me it seems to be original research. And, albeit most likely correct, it is unsubstantiated by a credible source.
74.68.62.64 21:50, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That last comment was me I just forgot to sign in Andrew 21:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:I am a Dalek

message: Since I am a Dalek is, strictly speaking, a novella rather than a novel, is it OK that it's in :Category:2006 novels and :Category:Tenth Doctor novels?  Should we have a category for Doctor Who novellas, for this and the Telos Doctor Who novellas? —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 04:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You could just have it in the main "Doctor Who Books" category. Angmering 06:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 17:42, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't think there's much point worrying about the distinctions between novel and novella when it comes to the categories given the various overlaps in length between the Telos "novellas", the Virgin and earlier BBC Books novels, the current new series adventures and the old Target novelisations. Are we going to call the shorter novelisations novellas and the longer Telos "novellas" novels? They're all novels in a more general sense of the word. Bondegezou 22:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Going by other precedents, it appears that novellas published on their own tend to be put in the "YEAR novels" categories so I have done so with this one, in lieu of there being a "YEAR novellas" category (which might eventually come). 23skidoo 06:19, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novel or novella? 

message: Can anyone speak to this book's distribution status in North America? I've just been informed that it is unavailable to Amazon despite it being listed on their site and it has yet to turn up in any bookstores at least in my part of Canada. 23skidoo 18:43, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Distribution status in North America
Talk:Moonshake

message: ==Untitled==
isnt his name David Lance Callahan? 
there is is an author named David Callahan, are they the same person? - (post unsigned)
::I think you're right about the middle name. As for the author, don't know. Callahan is certainly articulate, but the last time I encountered him and his work he was more inclined towards film than literature. Dann Chinn (talk) 17:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Further adventures of Callahan

message: isnt his name David Lance Callahan? 
there is is an author named David Callahan, are they the same person? - (post unsigned)
::I think you're right about the middle name. As for the author, don't know. Callahan is certainly articulate, but the last time I encountered him and his work he was more inclined towards film than literature. Dann Chinn (talk) 17:48, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cape Tribulation, Queensland

message: There is no reason to have an article for each of the walks in the area.  They lack notability and Dubuji Boardwalk is unreferenced so it would be better to include it within this page. - Shiftchange (talk) 13:19, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Support (for the same reasons). I had been about to suggest the merge myself but you beat me to it! Kerry (talk) 19:56, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

text: Support per nom. Laurel Lodged (talk) 20:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Atherton Tableland

message: As I see it, this article has the appearance of a hodge podge of information. Some sections are well written and referenced, but the article as a whole needs a lot of work to bring it up to a even a reasonable standard. I've added the  template to the article for the following reasons:
* For a start, it has no infobox
* There are no inline citations throughout most of the article, and few citations in the rest.
* The content badly needs to be reorganised. The level3 section 'industry' should be a section on its own, but most of the current content in that subsection should remain under the level2 section 'History'. The new level2 section 'Industry' would focus on and expand the meagre mentions that modern industry receives in the current article. Especially important are agriculture and tourism, but many others exist.
* The second half of the 'History' section that deals with exploration by Europeans is disjunctive, slipping back and forth in time, and has poor wikilinking practices.
The above is, of course, just my opinions. I welcome some discussion on how we can improve the article either collaboratively or individually. Keen to see your replies.  Junglenut |Talk  12:32, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: An infobox with basic details has been added.  Junglenut |Talk  23:48, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple issues December 2022
Talk:Championship unification

message: Title unification is only when two (or more) titles combine into one.  SilentRage 23:50, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This whole article is pretty much wrong! 

message: Someone should add the AWA and WCCW Tilte unification on the the examples of championship unification article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.157.240.203 (talk) 13:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I forget what the unified WCCW and AWA title was called but it was NOT the USWA title, the name USWA didn't even exist until 1989 and was the combination of WCCW and the CWA after they had a falling out with the AWA, so that name is wrong MPJ-DK 09:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  USWA 

message: Can we vote to keep the diva's championship because the women's has already done its time or combine the two into wwe new queen championship or something.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.218.112.28 (talk) 20:54, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you seem to think Wikipedia has creative control over WWE? --UnquestionableTruth-- 02:01, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep divas title leave women's title <sweetbabe2062> 

message: Do these not count since both matches were unifying the same belt?LM2000 (talk) 22:34, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose the recent Magnus/AJ situation would also fall under this category.LM2000 (talk) 22:48, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shawn/Razor, Punk/Cena
Talk:Castle Hill convict rebellion

message: This article needs a lot of work. It should begin with a factual account, then go on to discuss views of the rising. Also, lots of spelling and grammatical errors need fixing. JQ 23:50, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing heading 

message: In the first paragraph, there is a citation needed since Feb 2007. I will research the alleged fact of possibly 120 people killed, but further along it states 15 killed from the fighting. Expect this potentially incorrect fact sorted by tomorrow! --Macr237 (talk) 11:16, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Needed 

message: I reverted the 31 Aug 08 revision because it seemed to have multiple issues (pushing some strongly anti-English view, irrelevant information, poor spelling) and thought that the chance of having useful information (e.g. the change in number from 230->430 and the bit of info about what happened after) was put in doubt without references. 124.170.36.94 (talk) 21:14, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of new content on Vinegar Hill 

message: I have made some necessary changes to the body of the text to remove errors and upgrade the content.
The beginning section of the article - that is the summary part - does not have an 'edit' function. 
How do I gain entry to edit it? Have searched the FAQs but found nothing. ~~~~
Nevwik  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nevwik (talk • contribs) 06:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Just go straight to Edit at the top. Nickm57 (talk) 09:22, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing introduction to the entry 
Talk:Philosophy of geography

message: The layout of the article does not fit the topic.
*The article ought to start with an ontological debate about 'What is Geography?' in this case the issue that geography has no unified definition and the issue as to whether geography is a Science, Social Science or a Humanity ought to be addressed.
*Methodology of geography should contain the various methodologies (obviously) such as the scientific method (including cause and effect - deduction, induction and abduction) and critical geographies methods (feminist, humanist, radical etc) of analysis and not really quantitative and qualitative. Easiest way would be to split this into phys geog methos and human geog methods.
*Geographical perspectives - at the moment is irrelevant as it does not makes sense as ecological is a subset of spatial?!
*Role of geography should be changed into whether geography should be policy relvant or whether it should be purely educational. (At present it has philosophy in there for no apparent reason) Also the use of meta theories or multiple theories and models, focus on process or form and reality or representation could be disscussed as well as the issue of whether geographers should focus on generalisties or on the uniquness of the local.
*Environmental Determinism ought not be given shuch prominance there are many other philosophies to be written about such as critical realism, logical positivism, critical rationalism, pragmatic realism, causality, application of chaos and complexity, systems theory, geosophy, Non-representational theory,  Post-Colonial theories, marxism, post-marxism, neo-malthusianism, Lefebvre, political ecology (already on the geography page and has it's own article) to name but a few.
The article has a lot of work to be done, hopefully you will help and my time is limited, but it is achievable. I shall go and do some reading to get more information and hopefully be able to help after the geography article itself has been sorted. AlexD 12:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout???

message: I've pruned the article back to a stub, and added a few relevant bits. the old version  is here. I've also requested attention from the relevant wikiprojects.  Banno 10:14, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shake up
Talk:Dumfries Academy

message: I'm not sure whether or not the schools contact details should be included in the article. Would anyone mind if I removed them? Tartan 23:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Contact details

message: A very old school which is potentially more important than is apparent from the present article. Tell us more. Pics and references would be welcome. Dahliarose 11:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Associateship of the Camborne School of Mines

message: Should this be merged with Associateship of the Camborne School of Mines (ACSM) which is almost identical
I have replaced this page with a redirect to Associateship of the Camborne School of Mines (ACSM) which already contains all the information which was in this article.--DuncanHill 13:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: There is a proposal for merging this article into the main CSM article. The debate is at the CSM talk page here - Talk:Camborne School of Mines#Proposed Merger of Associateship of the Camborne School of Mines into Camborne School of Mines. DuncanHill (talk) 01:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merger of [[Associateship of the Camborne School of Mines]] into [[Camborne School of Mines]]
Talk:Underground music

message: ?
I think indie is more of a music genre now or sound. It would be cool if some posted a list of underground bands by region. 
----
This article should be merged with Indie music, or vice versa. They are both mean basically the same thing. Although I can't decide... what topic is a subset of what? Is "Indie" a category of "Underground Music" or vice versa?
--Chosen1 02:24, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I don't think they're the same thing.  Almost anything on an indie label (not owned by the big four) could be called indie if it's not solidly in one of the usual genres.  In particular a band could be indie if it is selling recordings and never or rarely performs.  An underground band primarily is a performing band, in minor venues, with a minimal or zero penetration of the recorded music market.  Just my opinion.
Spope3 (talk) 01:20, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indie vs. Underground 

message: "Some underground rock bands never got non-mainstream roots." Say what?77Mike77 (talk) 14:51, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaningless illiteracy.