Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Luxembourg

message: I have nominated German occupation of Luxembourg during World War I for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 21:50, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR nomination 

message: After successfully completing our Asia and Africa contests over the past six months, we now welcome contributions to our Women in Europe contest which runs for three separate months from April to June 2021. To qualify for the contest, articles have to contain at least 160 words or 1,000 characters of running text and participants need to be members of Women in Red. We look forward to lots of new biographies of women from Luxembourg.--Ipigott (talk) 06:48, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Women in Red Europe contest

message: She is seem like a major historical figure from your country. The article is in AfD. Pls kindly give your opinion at AfD. Thanks VocalIndia (talk) 10:50, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need attention for [[Ogive of Luxembourg]] 

message: Hi. Please see this discussion. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:04, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  International footballer at AfD 

message: An editor has requested for :Greater Region to be merged into :Greater Region of SaarLorLux. Since you had some involvement with Greater Region or Greater Region of SaarLorLux, you might want to participate in the merger discussion (if you have not already done so). --Heanor (talk) 10:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion about merger [[Greater Region]] into [[Greater Region of SaarLorLux]] 

message: Hi. Please see this discussion. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 16:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  AfD 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Duchy of Luxemburg#Requested move 18 August 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Duchy of Luxemburg#Requested move 18 August 2023]] 

message: Hello! I am working on multiple articles regarding the Luxembourg Rebellions of 1918-1919 and I could uses some help. If anyone knows any good sources I could uses I need all the help I can get. I have made the following articles. 
Luxembourg Rebellions of 1918-1919 
* Luxembourg Rebellion 1918
* Luxembourg Rebellion 1919
** Luxembourg Republic
I have some questions about the events if anyone knows the answer.
# What units were involved in stopping the Luxembourg Rebellion 1918
# Did the Luxembourg Corps of Gendarmes remain loyal to the government in the 1919 rebellion
# Who commanded the Luxembourg Army during this?
# Did any other countries help luxembourg?
# What was the casualty count of these rebellions?
Thanks for your time and I can uses all the help I can get for this project!  LuxembourgLover (talk) 02:52, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles are up for merging so I could uses help defending them. LuxembourgLover (talk) 15:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:CANVASSING? The Banner talk 16:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Per the discussion you said ask projects to help. LuxembourgLover (talk) 16:45, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I did not. You wanted to ask advice on another Wikiproject and hoped that you would take their advice on board. The Banner talk 23:05, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked a WikiProject that is about the events. I think the Luxembourg WikiProject will be interested in the Luxembourg Rebellions of 1918-1919. If it was a major event this WikiProject would be helpful.  LuxembourgLover (talk) 16:52, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luxembourg Rebellions of 1918-1919 

message: Hi! Wanted to make this wikiproject aware I am currently working on an article on the pastry fueskichelcher (or verwurelter), if any user had anything to contribute. Also, if anyone can confirm whether or not there is a difference (I don't see any, and no website mentions both) that would be great. Cheers! UnexpectedSmoreInquisition (talk) 13:22, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Fueskichelcher/Verwurelter

message: Hello WikiProject Luxembourg: 
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. 
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 13:19, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon 

message: Hello/Moien! Luxembourgish transport nerd here. I noticed that our articles for railway stations, big bus depots/stops (Hamilius/Luxexpo) are either stubs or do not exist. Over the next month or two I will be heavily editing these articles. Expect a lot. If you want to help with photos and all, feel free to do so. I am starting with the revamp of all stations' articles that are on the CFL Line 60. Below, you will find the list. Each station will be separated into 3 phases of development: research & basic info, facts and backstory and finally some extra info, if applicable.
# Differdange Gare (1/3)
# Oberkorn Gare - to do
# Niederkorn Gare - to do
# Pétange Gare - to do
# Rodange Gare - to do
# Lamadelaine Gare - to do
# Belval-Université Gare - researching
# Belval-Rédange Gare - trying to find a way to update it
# Belval-Lycée - in process of research
# Noertzange - to do
# Berchem - to do
# Howald - taking photos soon
# Gare Centrale - will add more info and more photos
# Bettembourg - finding a way to write it
# Hamilius - taken photos, will create an article
# Luxexpo - same story as Hamilius
# Kirchberg-Pafendall Gare - to do
# Gare Centrale Routiére - will create an article or maybe a section?
May have missed out on some stations, but they will all be coming and I will update the TICE, RGTR, Sales-Lentz and Emile-Weber articles.
I will try to work, please reply if you have any suggestions, photos and/or you would like to help me.
Have a nice day, keep editing :) Atharva210 (talk) 19:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transport Articles about Luxembourg - we should also work on this 

message: (non-automated message) Greetings to all members of WP:LUX! I have opened an RfC on WT:ROYALTY that may be of interest to users of this WikiProject! You are encouraged to contribute to this discussion here! Hurricane Andrew (444) 22:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC of interest 

message: As there are a lot of French speakers here and as it affects this country's political history, this seems as good a place as any to ask.
How would you translate "christianisme social" and similar terms "les chretiens-sociaux"?
Examples:
*"...les trois grandes familles spirituelles de notre pays : le christianisme social, le libéralisme et le socialisme"
*"La voie d'un rapprochement avec la tendance chrétienne-sociale de la droite s'esquisse"
*".... P. Dupong, l'un des fondateurs du christianisme-social de chez nous"
Christian socialism does NOT seem to be the right term at all, as the CSV is many things but not socialist. Other authors often just translate "les chretiens-sociaux" into English as "the CSV", which seems cheating a bit. "Christian democracy" / Christian-democratic might fit, but also doesnt feel right somehow... Dr Gangrene (talk) 18:15, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  French translation help