Talk:History of Dedham, Massachusetts, 1635–1699

message: For an article this comprehensive, I'm surprised there is no mention here of Dedham's distinctive role in the founding of Deerfield, Massachusetts. Magic♪piano 00:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Deerfield?

message: A canoe trip up the Charles River, including a clever quip by someone named "Miles," is cited as fact. The source is a 1903 book by Abbott, Katharine M.,  "Old Paths And Legends Of New England." The canoe trip is a "legend," as the title of the book implies. "Miles and "Moore" are fictional characters.
The article also omits several important steps in the process by which the early settlers of Dedham obtained a land grant of unparalleled size.
Revision to come.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cockeyed (talk • contribs) 03:47, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article cites a work of fiction as fact 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on History of Dedham, Massachusetts, 1635–1792. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050103074558/http://users.ox.ac.uk:80/~arch0050/massfhd.htm to http://users.ox.ac.uk/~arch0050/massfhd.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061231055238/http://www.dedhamhistorical.org:80/newsletters/2001/dhs_news_12-01.doc to http://www.dedhamhistorical.org/newsletters/2001/dhs_news_12-01.doc
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:19, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on History of Dedham, Massachusetts, 1635–1792. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070322044316/http://www.uia.net/~lsforeman/sanprom.htm to http://www.uia.net/~lsforeman/sanprom.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928151049/http://lazyacresnorth.com/2007/07/04/my-revolutionaries.aspx to http://lazyacresnorth.com/2007/07/04/my-revolutionaries.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061206041140/http://www.ci.norwood.ma.us/townhall/brief.html to http://www.ci.norwood.ma.us/townhall/brief.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The fourth paragraph in the first section names the Mother Brook as "the first man-made canal in America." This might be true if it were changed to "in Colonial America." But, as it stands, it is a false statement. The earliest man-made canals in America found thus far were at the Las Capas site, near Tucson, which features an irrigation system dating to 1200 BCE. That predates Mother Brook by over 2800 years. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehistoric_agriculture_in_the_Southwestern_United_States#Canal_irrigation Nachobidnez (talk) 01:33, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the 'first' man-made canal by a long shot!