lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fusuma

message: This article doesn't make it very clear exactly what the difference is between fusuma and shoji. If someone well-educated in Japanese architecture could provide historical/traditional/architectuaral/aesthetic/practical differences between the two, this article could be greatly improved. Also, this article should probably be expanded. If it can't be, then maybe it should be merged with the shoji article. 72.39.148.218 (talk) 03:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added in the main difference, that shōji are translucent compared to fusuma.  The Japanese Wikipedia entries keep both pages separate (https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%A5%96 Fusuma) and (https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%9A%9C%E5%AD%90 Shōji), so we should keep the English Wikipedia entries separate as well.  There is a lot of content on both Japanese pages, someone just needs to translate them to the English pages. -BoatSnack (talk) 14:16, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Same diff?
Talk:Mystic Order of Veiled Prophets of the Enchanted Realm

message: What is the significance of the horns extruding from behind the Mokanna head? 
What do they symbolize?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.160.153.250 (talk) 00:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange... 

message: The VP fair is a very big deal in Saint Louis, Missouri. It is (or was?) sponsored by the MOVPER. Why did we delete all mention of it? Paul, in Saudi (talk) 10:07, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This group has nothing to do with the St. Louis observance. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 07:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: VP Fair
Talk:Lawgiver (Judge Dredd)

message: I suspect the peopel at Termight reproductions might be amenable to the image of their Lawgiver being used here - anyone fancy dropping them a line? (Emperor 23:52, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: What's the likelihood that armor piercing is a sabot round?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.144.13.168 (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AP Ammo
Talk:Santiago meteorite

message: This article is difficult to read--the language is terrible, sources are not cited, and the claims are largely unverifiable.  It needs a complete rewrite with attention to getting the language corrected and clear for the reader.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.178.101.32 (talk • contribs) 07:42, 13 July 2006
:Agreed: this needs work.  Unfortunately, I am not familiar with the event; nor does the article provide enough context for me to even make minor fixes here and there.  --Thisisbossi 03:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bishrampur block

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 15:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Chatarpur block

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 15:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:10, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Chainpur block, Palamu

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 15:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:07, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Daltanganj block

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 15:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:13, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Hariharganj block

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 15:04, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:23, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Basque Argentines

message: Some issues with this article as of today: a. it is not meant to discuss what the Basque country and people are (and the word "cultural" is disturbing), and b. all the figures are suspect. any back-up?
Also, since Argentina is a giant ethnic mixer, I'd bet that maybe 25% or more of Basque-Argentines do not carry a Basque surname (being the son of an X father and a Basque or Basque-Argentine mother) and therefore, unless we go the extra mile, we'll fall victim to popular usage: see a Basque name, especially a long one, and start calling the person "vasco/a". Is it worth going the extra mile? IMHO no -- maybe an article on Basque heritage in Argentina that mentions the most well-known issues... such as dairy farming, food processing, politics, and stopping penalties. elpincha 15:05, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I live in Argentina and I know many basque people. They aren't a mixture with another race, the basque language is spoken by many of them also. They're very nationalists I doubt that they mix with other people =/. --Vokoder 10:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I thing the Vascongada was sold to Parmalat. BTW, don't forget my favourite Vasco! Mariano(t/c) 08:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues

message: Che guevara was a basque argentine as well. he is certainly of note in the images.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.166.217.183 (talk) 19:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues
Talk:FTR (bus)

message: I've started work on a major cleanup of this article, mainly involving removing large amounts of unsourced claims, and finding sources for the rest. If anyone knows of any sources that will be useful, either add them into the article or list them here. All help improving the article would be appriciated. --Jorvik 20:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Given that they have been withdrawn altogether in York and withdrawn on evenings and Sundays in Leeds, and Firstbus has got rid of the www.goftr.com microsite does this indicate their days are numbered? (86.145.191.85 (talk) 23:33, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that they are going to be used on the Leeds to Bradford corridor so maybe not just yet. :) Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it seems they're still going on however judging by this, this and this there's been a lot of rumours flying around ..... Having not visited Bradford or Leeds in my entire life I would have no clue but I'd personally say judging by the comments etc it looks like they could be withdrawn by the end of the year but that's my 2¢. –Davey2010Talk 16:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  On their way out? 
Talk:Common year starting on Sunday

message: I’m trying to find a calendar that 2101 and 2107 starts on a Sunday, but rather it starts on Saturday 
2073, 2079, and 2090 all start and end on Sunday 
2084 is a leap year it starts on Saturday and ends on Sunday 
2096 is a leap year it starts on Sunday and ends on Monday 
1973, 1979, 1990, 2001, and 2007 all started and ended on Monday 
1984 was a leap year started on Sunday and ended on Monday (follows same calendar as 2096) 
1996 was a leap year started on Monday and ended on Tuesday (should’ve followed the same as 2108) 
When I try  gives an output as  adds a day.
Same applies with  gives an output as  adds a day.
July 7, 2107 is a  rather than a Friday which occurs in 2073, 2079, and 2090.
July 8, 2107 is a  rather than a Saturday which occurs in 2073, 2079, and 2090. 
Is there a year that is no leap year, that breaks the sub-28 cycle? 
--2605:A000:1103:55F:D8DC:7710:49DE:CEFD (talk) 03:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2101, 2107 and missing a day
Talk:Richard Ducharme

message: While Ducharme's exit story is mostly true, it should be verified with sources. FOr example was it Miller or Moscoe that fired him? Also, there needs to be a source for the David Gunn accusation. --Atrian 15:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ducharme's claim is still a point of considerable dispute; we shouldn't be presenting it as fact.  CJCurrie 01:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Costs

message: The difference in Toronto is that Ducharme did recommend to the board to have an open bid, but it was turned down. However, in Edmonton, the contract was already signed before he got there. The next time another contract comes back, we will see how Ducharme reacts. The existing wording is not that POV-ish but it does have the effect of making him look like a hypocrite.
Lastly, the main reason why Ducharme left was interference, as there were negotiations between Moscoe and the transit union behind his back, and he citing this to the media. We don't know whether Ducharme would have left because of just the Bombardier contract. GoldDragon 03:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ducharme in Edmonton
Talk:Hussainabad block

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 15:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:25, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Lesliganj

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 15:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Manatu block

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 15:13, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:39, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition 
Talk:Pandu block

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 15:14, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Panki block

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 15:14, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Sarvastivada

message: Otherwise, it appears to be the editors interpretations only.  Alien666 13:44, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This article needs references to clarify

message: I don't think it's appropriate to structure the article around conjecture and an image of Tibetan monks. This clearly associates Tibetan rpactice with the subject of the article whereas it was my impression tha tin reality it seems most evidence linking Sarvastivadin texts exists in Gandhara or north of Tibet in the former Buddhist kingdoms of the Taklamakan. prat (talk) 03:21, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Tibetan monks are technically from the Mulasarvastivada Nikaya (they follow the Mulasarvastivada Vinaya), and the Mulasarvastivada Nikaya has its basis in the Sarvastivadins of Mathura, so far as we know. So the Tibetan monks are technically a subdivision of Sarvastivada. The "early Buddhist schools," first and foremost, were basically vinaya lineages. Tengu800 03:41, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sarvastivada vs. Tibetan Buddhism

message: This section provides some valuable information, but unfortunately isn't referenced in detail. In particular, one of several theories on the connection between the Sarvastivada and the Mulasarvastivada is being presented as fact without attribution- that the Sauntantrika developed into the Mulasarvastivada. --Spasemunki (talk) 06:27, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Time for research! Ogress smash! 08:13, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details of Philosophy
Talk:Satbarwa block

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 15:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:52, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Patan block

message: In some earlier instances, I found that redirection link was created for such stubs – redirecting the page to the district of which the administrative block formed part of. Please avoid any such redirection link. Please try to understand the way in which the project is expected to grow: let us allow the stub/s to grow. To understand the issues in a comprehensive way, reading and understanding - User:Angela/Stubs – shall be of useful. Thank you. --Bhadani 15:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: A request

message: with Jharkhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Jharkhand or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 10:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Jharkhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Church Hill Square

message: Having fixed a couple of problems in the body text, I was about to rename this article from "Church Hill Square" to the correct name, "Churchill Square", but I see that in fact there's already a "Churchill Square (Brighton & Hove)" article anyway. The latter has more content. Therefore the present article, which is not linked to, is a pretty clear-cut candidate for speedy deletion. – Kieran T (talk | contribs) 15:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requires deletion
Talk:Mary Malone

message: "The Dust"? Please delete the "the"! Fuzzibloke 15:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't this page redirect to Typhoid Mary?  That seems to be the more notable use, despite the difference in spelling. askewchan (talk) 15:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Mary Mallon (Typhoid Mary)
Talk:Xiphophorus

message: :These two species were later found to be natural hybrids by the original authors (See Herbert Axelrod & Lothar Wischnath 1991. Swordtails and Platies.) Recent publications (see e.g. Kallman 2006, Cui et al., 2013) on the genus do not treat these two species as valid.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.194.95.110 (talk) 15:51, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding Xiphophorus kosszanderi and Xiphophorus roseni 
Talk:Poeciliidae

message: the genera list looks wrong - Jenynsia is in a different family -? Can some one fix please.HappyVR 04:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: genera

message: No, not all members of the family are livebearers - that's simply inaccurate. All the South-American genera (except one) are ovoviviparous (live-bearing), but all the African representatives are normal egg-layers, similar to other cyprinodontiforms.
213.114.237.122 19:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: live-bearing
Talk:Gambusia

message: hello  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.57.66 (talk) 02:24, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Onesided livebearer

message: I came across this which makes me think this page needs some expert attention: "The gonopodium can be brought forward on one side only, and left and right males are found in approximately the same proportion. Contrary to what is commonly stated in aquarist textbooks the female's sexual opening appears to be perfectly symmetrical, so males can mate indifferently with all the females of the population (Ghedotti & Weitzman 1996; Bisazza, unpubl. data)."  This is from Bisazza et al. 2000. Sexual Competition, Coercive Mating and Mate Assessment in the One-Sided Livebearer, Jenynsia multidentata: Are They Predictive of Sexual Dimorphism?  Ethology 106:961-978.  I'm not an expert in these fish, but it seems like there's at least disagreement the reproductive practices.  Thoughts? --TeaDrinker (talk) 03:01, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mating: Expert attention needed