lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Euler line

message: How can Euler have proved that these four points lie on the same line if the 9 point circle wasn't discovered until Feuberbach?--345Kai 12:40, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it seems he didn't prove it as he only defines points O, G, H and I in his article. I fixed the article. --Shenanenigans (talk) 19:47, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nine-point circle

message: The last paragraph says, "The Euler line is its own complement, and therefore also its own anticomplement."
What is a "complement"? What is an "anticomplement"?
Nwbeeson 20:24, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Complement?

message: The attached diagram has a mistake. On the left side of the triangle, the square "right angle" indicator is attached to the orange median, rather than the green line that helps define the circumcenter. Since the circumcenter lines are defined to be at right angles to the side, and in general the median can make any angle with the side (and certainly does not make a right angle with the side in this diagram), the right angle indicator should be attached to the green line instead.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.0.58.125 (talk) 20:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for catching that! It is a small mistake, with the black edge of the square extended only slightly too far, but it would be nice to have it corrected. I looked on the page that the image is linked from, and it appears that only one person who has ever contributed to the diagram is still on Wikipedia. I've left him a message asking him to read your post here. Duoduoduo (talk) 21:33, 6 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake in diagram
Talk:Football in Russia

message: Made more NPOV and changed some wording; forgot to put an entry in the edit summary --iamajpeg 01:36, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More old talk

message: quote "Today, football is the number one sport in the country" 
a major sport, definitly 
number one? i'm not so sure
what about ice hockey ??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.216.89.205 (talk) 11:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Number one sport?

message: It looks like the Russian football league system has no information beyond a simple structure grid. It will be more beneficial on this page. I propose merging it into this page. Thoughts? Truther2012 (talk) 19:26, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: I think Football in the Soviet Union should be merged into this article. What does  anyone else think? Dwanyewest (talk) 01:36, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New merger proposals 

message: Hey! I significantly improved the article adding more up-to-date information, fixing errors and providing credible sources. Check my edits here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Football_in_Russia&type=revision&diff=814153863&oldid=813054523 
P.S. I also added more links and references. Cskamoscow100 (talk) 4:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision
Talk:The King Must Die

message: Still relevant no verifiability, references, clear proofs of notability. These really should be added, the article is really a Start at least but without any referencing to support the article it is making a point that we return the Stub rating. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 07:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also if the Stub is genuinely not relevant anymore is should be rerated not just have the WikiProject banner removed. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 07:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Still just Stub

message: I'm wondering, is it permissible to include references that are from Sparknotes or Cliffsnotes? Is that considered verifiable? User:Massyold 19:08, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, as long as the specific source is noted; let me know if you need any help formatting references. TAnthony 01:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Lieutenant Hornblower

message: I've just fixed the infobox, which mixed internal and publication order (preceeding was by internal chronology, followed by was by publication order). According to Template talk:Infobox Book#Preceded_and_followed_by_fields, these are for internal chronology. --Stephan Schulz 16:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preceeded/Followed by 

message: C. Northcote Parkinson, in "The Life and Times of Horatio Hornblower" (1970), advances an interesting theory on the events of this novel ... in particular, the peculiar accident and subsequent murder of the crazy captain. It might be suitably worked into this article and, at any rate, every Hornblower fan should read it! rewinn 06:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Did Hornblower Do It?
Talk:Lord Hornblower

message: Why is an article on a novel giving simply the title, author, a synopsis of that novel and an infobox required to cite references or sources? Surely the novel itself is the reference work to be consulted on any statement made, and the infobox enables one to trace that work. Mabzilla (talk) 10:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are references and sources necessary?
Talk:Mr. Midshipman Hornblower

message: In the A & E movies, it seems implied that Simpson may have been forcing himself on Archie to induce Archies episodes... were Archies fits a part of the novel as well, and if so did the stories clarify if Simpson was raping or simply bullying Archie to an extreme degree?
"Archie" (Midshipman Kennedy) was not introduced into Forester's novel until after Simpson had been written out of the plot. The writers for the television movies made considerable changes in the story. If you have not already done so, I would advise you to read the novel, which I think you will find vastly superior.--Mabzilla 13:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation 

message: 'historical fiction' isn't really a genre. HF can be comic, literary, sci fi,, adventure, romance.
I suggest action/adventure is more appropriate Crawiki (talk) 10:39, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre... Questionable
Talk:The Outlaw of Torn

message: The best resource about this ERB work seems to be:
www.erbzine.com/mag7/0754.html
PUBLISHING HISTORY (USA) 
PULP 
News Story Magazine: Jan., Feb., Mar., Apr., May 1914 
    The same B/W headpiece was used for each of the five installments 
FIRST EDITION 
McClurg: February 19, 1927 ~ March 1927 ~ 298 pages ~ 1st Ed. Print Run: 6,000 ~ McClurg Total: 57,000 ~ Heins word count: 65,000 
    J. Allen St. John dust jacket ~ no interiors 
REPRINT EDITIONS 
Grosset & Dunlap: 1928 ~ numerous printings 
    J. Allen St. John dust jacket 
Ace Books: November 1928 ~ 255 pages 
    Roy G. Krenkel: cover and title page art 
Ace Books: January 1973 ~ 75 cents 
    Frank Frazetta cover art 
Ace Books: 95 cents 
    Frank Frazetta cover art 
Ace Books: $1.50 cents 
    Frank Frazetta cover art 
Ace Books: November 1978 ~ $1.95 cents 
    Frank Frazetta cover art 
-96.233.20.116 (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great external resource
Talk:Buddhism in the Russian Federation

message: I don't remember any single thing about native or official religions of Russia in its Constitution. What's the source of this info?
According to my knowledge there is a law on religious union in Russia that states that the religious union which practiced their religion on territory of Russia for 50 years may include the word Russian in its title. But there are no titles of native or non-native religions. Zweifler 12:52, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as is in the Constitution of the Russian Federation
Статья 14 (Article 14)
1. Российская Федерация - светское государство. Никакая религия не может устанавливаться в качестве государственной или обязательной. (The Russian Federation is a secular state. None religion can be established as the state or the imperative.)
2. Религиозные объединения отделены от государства и равны перед законом. (Religious associations are isolated from the state and are equal protected of the law.)
The term native, official or traditional religions in RF does not have the legislative basis Kmorozov 13:16, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Sea Hawk

message: What exactly is a "hawk of the sea" (according to the novelist)? I see that hawk in the English language sometimes has a lot more general connotations than hök from my native Swedish. Then I find the osprey often has been called "sea hawk". But the cover picture of the novel doesn't look like an osprey. Someone has a clue?--Paracel63 (talk) 17:28, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, Paracel63. "Sea hawk" is an alternate term for an osprey. I think the fault lies with the artist, who was going for a more romanticized look than perhaps an osprey would provide. — HarringtonSmith (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

text: Also, Sabatini himself: The Sea Hawk is a lot catchier than The Osprey — HarringtonSmith (talk) 18:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Hawk of the sea?

message: One has to understand that the title is designed to attract readers with an exotic term
In the Arabic I know Saker-Al-Baher  actually means to "CLOSE-THE-SEA"
So go figure ..
In some Arabic dialects HAWK == هوك (HOOK)  and  FALCON == فالكون (FALKOON)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Al.Qudsi (talk • contribs) 03:48, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  SEA HAWK - Saker-Al-Baher 

message: What is the suggestion for editing or redrafting this plot summary? Personally I can never see the point of a full summary, which is bound to contain spoilers. I would have thought you just need a list of the characters and their roles, followed by a short account of the action, not giving away important details. Valetude (talk) 20:42, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary
Talk:Mk (software)

message: mk (Plan 9) → mk – Everything else on that disambiguation page is an abbreviation while mk is actually called mk.
===Support===
# Support ems 12:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is clearly is the way to go. Lost Goblin 09:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: # Support ems 12:56, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: * mk is currently the only thing in the mk namespace on wikipedia called mk. ems 13:29, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that is clearly is the way to go. Lost Goblin 09:16, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:The Silver Branch (Sutcliff novel)

message: I find that Wikipedia calls this book a children's book highly insulting. Someone please change it. --Arkatox (talk) 19:29, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children's Historical Novel?
Talk:Solomon Gursky Was Here

message: It may be nice to add a section indicating more clearly the parallels between the Bronfman/Seagram and the Gursky/McTavish histories.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colin Rowat (talk • contribs) 14:41, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

message: This section presents commentary on the book - but whose ? If quotes, they should be presented as such. If not - are they original research ? -- Beardo (talk) 14:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism section
Talk:The Source (novel)

message: This was a fairly successful and widely-read book at the time of publication, and it's also an excellent piece of literature, so I think it deserves a more comprehensive article. I was originally put onto the novel by an honours thesis I was reading,  so that may serve as a jumping-off point to get more material. -Nasica (talk) 11:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for expanding the page

message: *Chapter #15 was 1880; Chapter # 16 was 1948. No mention is made of World War I in the Middle East; nor is their mention of the Zion Mule Corps; the Jewish Legion; the split of the Zionist movement between Ben-Gurion and Vladimir Jabotinsky; the rise of Arab Nationalism;World War II...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.53.145.35 (talk) 21:43, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical Omissions and Poor Impressions

message: I don’t know where in the article to add this, but I think it’s worth noting where in Israel the (fictional) tell is supposed to be located. I’ve been listening to The Source on Audible, which has 104 chapters. In the middle of chapter 72, which corresponds to the end of chapter 13 in the book, it transitions from the late 13th century to the early 16th century. At the end of the transition, the narrator says, “Then, in the early 1500s, a few men and their families began returning from the far ends of the Mediterranean and from ports in between. They were Jews.  And they came not to Makor, from which they had sprung but of whose existence they knew nothing. They came to Safed, 17 miles to the east.” So, the tell was supposed to be located 17 miles west of Safed. That places the tell somewhere on the western front of the Galilee region. DAK4Blizzard (talk) 06:08, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Location of the Tell
Talk:Streets of Laredo (novel)

message: How much time has elapsed between the end of Lonesome Dove and the beginning of Streets of Laredo?  I am guessing fifteen or twenty years, but I do not know the author's intent.
L. Thomas W. (talk) 15:20, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Much Time?
Talk:The Talisman (Scott novel)

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Dalziel Brothers - Sir Walter Scott - The Talisman - Sir Kenneth before the King.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 29, 2010. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2010-07-29. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 21:29, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Dalziel Brothers - Sir Walter Scott - The Talisman - Sir Kenneth before the King.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Saladin is depicted favorably in "The Talisman."  Here's Scott's biographer Edgar Johnson on the matter:  "As the narrative paints the situation, Saladin, though a faithful Moslem, is a wise and humane ruler who demands no forced conversions and grants free access to those pilgrims of all three faiths for whom Jerusalem is a Holy City."  Johnson, "Sir Walter Scott," Vol. II, p. 933.  
MacLennan123Maclennan123 (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saladin 

message: I changed the last paragraph of the plot summary. I don't believe that it was King Richard who gave Sir Kenneth his higher rank (what right would an English king have to assign a Scottish rank anyway)? Rather, Kenneth was his alter ego all along.
Also, although the historical Richard was captured in the Tyrol on his way home, this is not part of the novel. Eoghan (talk) 18:35, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  End of plot summary
Talk:Pie crust

message: This should be cleaned up and merged... 
Sfacets 13:03, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

message: who wrote this?  vegetable shortening!?!?  is this a crisco representative/shill?  trans fat, anyone??!!
"butter is the worst"?!?!  who the hell says so?!  any good patissier will roll their eyes at this.  why doesn't wikipedia have an article for pâte brisée?
oh hell, let me rewrite this...
:Either way, one thing is clear: this article is original research (if that!) and as such is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Deletion might be better than merging. --Splitpeasoup 02:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  horrible
Talk:Obfuscating software

message: The part about "Code Morphing" being NP-hard seems like confusing technobabble. What exactly is the specification of the "code restoration" problem that is NP-hard, and is code restoration really the Holy Grail to "breaking" software? (Breaking RSA certainly doesn't involve any sort of code restoration, and it seems it's not even NP-complete...) Bi 13:17, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Good idea NLOleson 22:38, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Avdy Andresson

message: He became colonel only during 1970's, promoted by Tõnis Kint. In Estonian pre-WW II cavalry he was non-commissioned officer and in German cavalry, during WW II, captain.
Dear ExRat,
I must use my poor English to be understandable another users of English Wikipedia.
Your article is lavish and cntaining factual inaccuracies caused by casual and lacking sources.
Exact date, when A. A. died, is August 27, 1990.
Born and raised in Estonia, which was then part of the Russian Empire, Andresson served in the Czar's Cavalry as a colonel during World War I. In 1918, during the Estonian Liberation War against Russia from 1918 until the 1920 signing of the Treaty of Tartu in which Russia relinquished all claims of sovereignty over Estonia and the nation won its independence, Andresson served as a colonel in the newly formed Estonian Cavalry and Tanks division of the Estonian Army.
This passage is not correct. Do you really think, that this is possible to be colonel from ones birth? Actually A. A. served in Russian cavalry during WW I as an voluntary, 1917–1918 in Estonian cavalry regiment, in 1918 (during German occupation) a member of underground Defence League and during Estonian Liberation War in the 2. Cavalry Regiment. Why you have cited here Treaty of Tartu? This belongs nott o biographiy of A. A., because he was certainly not a signatory of this treaty.
: Maybe this is my bad English, but I did not infer that he was a signatory at the Treaty of Tartu. It was meant for historical context of what was happening militarily in Estonia at the time. And, of course I certainly didn't mean to infer that he was colonel since birth - I may not be the smartest person in the world, but am not that stupid.  ExRat 21:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is indeed my big mistake. I thought that at the time there was a Calvary division. ExRat 21:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Nagu peabki. Of course this was not the main aim of the WW II! But, unless conscripted, as you know - most Estonians who joined the German army did so in an effort to oust the Soviets. ExRat 21:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Erki, suur tänu. I greatly appreciate your help. Much of the information I gathered about Avdy Andresson was found at a site that I am currently unable to find - parema puudumisel. Kahjuks. I am quite pleased that you are able to add to the article. However, there are a few things that I think possibly you misunderstood - I didn't infer that Andresson was a signatory at the Treaty of Tartu. This was a simply for historical reference and context. Nor did I infer  that he was colonel since birth (maybe my bad English.) I have made some notations after some of you statements to clarify my meaning. Although, I do see that I was wrong with some information. Please feel free to make the correct changes to the article! I thank you once again! Terviseks!  ExRat 21:00, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:August Sabbe

message: There were more people, who were survived attempts and outlived him - it is said, that until 1988. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.159.185.18 (talk • contribs) 30 March 2006‎ 
Isn't his name actually August Sabbe? heqs 22:10, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. As the creator of this page, every reference I have seen besides the Bio and Gravesite, which are clearly part of the same site, to which there are links in the article states that his name is spelled "Sabe". Perhaps Sabe is an anglicised version of the original spelling. Also, do you happen to know the names of any of the survivors you mentioned above? If so, perhaps we could both add some external links to references. If you know, it would be very helpful.Thomasiscool 15:33, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Last survivor? / Spelling

message: By the way, I have added that the Bio and Gravesite pages are in Estonian.Thomasiscool 15:37, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the article accordingly. Thomasiscool 21:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bio
Talk:Tongahiti

message: Spelt "Tongahiti" in Craig.  Should it be moved there? Bucketsofg 13:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There may be other stories or proverbs (apart from White) that can verify that Tongahiti is related to headaches. Am looking. Kahuroa 04:36, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Headaches
Talk:Roger Bannister

message: Shouldn't it be first known or first recorded four minute mile? It's possible that someone in history has run that fast, it just wasn't recorded for posterity. Quark1005 (talk) 09:01, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  First "known" 4m mile?
Talk:Mursili's eclipse

message: Somebody needs to check the Paul Astrom reference -- according to NASA's map  the 1308 eclipse didn't even come near Anatolia (meaning, it would have been partial, not annular). Probably the sun might have risen partially obscured, that might have been noticed, and 4 years after the 1312 eclipse, people may have watched the sun with suspicion, still the 1312 date seems vasty more likely. Another point is, however, that the eclipse may have been "moved" retrospectively to align with the campaign, this sort of thing is frequent in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, lots of eclipses there have no historical counterpart. dab (ᛏ) 13:44, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the eclipse was moved. In the earlier years of Mursili's annal, he's preparing to attack Uhha-Ziti of Arzawa. A meteor streaks out of the sky and crashes into Apasas, where Uhha-Ziti was staying. Why did Mursili not insert the solar portent then? -Zimriel|t 15:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

text: It's because NASA uses the Julian calendar for dates prior to 1582; the Julian calendar has no year zero.  Historians are requested to add a year when encountering NASA dates.--Subwoofer (talk) 09:00, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

text: That has nothing to do with Julian calendar, it's just a more convenient way for astronomers to calculate if they introduce a year zero: Year_zero#Astronomical_notation. --Proofreader (talk) 07:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: In The Solar Omen of Musili II, Peter J. Huber, Journal of theAmerican Oriental Society, Oct-Dec, 2001 the dates of  March 13 1334 BCE and January 9 1339 BCE are proposed. Also
in Ancient Astronomical Observations and Near Eastern Chronology, W.A. Mitchel, JACF Vol 3,
1990, some ultra-low chronology dates are proposed. That later paper is availble
at http://www.newchronology.org/cgi-bin/somsid.cgi?session=1216316815&page=html/volumes/03
Ploversegg (talk) 17:59, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Other dates

message: Despite what it says at the beginning of the article, the eclipse is not mentioned in the Annals of Mursili.  It is actually reported in a prayer text.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.73.31.50 (talk) 18:05, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The eclipse is not mentioned in the Annals of Mursili. 
Talk:Mikrokosmos (Bartók)

message: Why are the pieces named Mikrokosmos? I think the article should explain that. --Surten (talk) 04:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Mikrokozmosz =  = Me-crow-coz'-mos' (like "I", the bird, "cozy" & "most")? Hyacinth (talk) 16:46, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Actually, Bartok's son, for whom the first volumes of the Mikrokosmos were written, was named Peter, not Paul. User:PaulaManuel (moved here and signed by Hyacinth)
:Thanks. Hyacinth 14:33, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Son

message: Does no-one else question the use of this image?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.96.53.86 (talk) 01:09, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What image? Do you question it? Hyacinth (talk) 15:55, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: User:Tassedethe removed the Template:For, "hat," at the top of the article pointing to, "the 1996 movie," Microcosmos, "per WP:NAMB". User:Galassi undid the revision, asking, "why?"
Presumably, according to WP:NAMB: "Here, the hatnote is inappropriate because a reader who is following links within Wikipedia or using Wikipedia's own search engine would not have ended up at [Mikrokosmos (Béla Bartók)] if one were looking for [Microcosmos (film)], since [Microcosmos and Mikrokosmos do] not redirect there." Hyacinth (talk) 16:08, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Hat: For

message: I suggest to include the file at right.Anythingyouwant (talk) 19:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  More music