lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Kerry/First Wound

message: #It should be stated that Kerry recieved a purple heart.
#His crewmates assertion that he was injured, but by what they do not know.
#The doctors statement that he was injured, and that he thought it could have been from a mortar round.
#That the Kerry campaign asserts that the doctor in question never had any contact with Kerry.
#That the Kerry campaign has not released any record that indicates he was treated for injury
Here are articles with supporting facts for both sides of the arguement:
Now, remember that most of these sources are biased, so be objective!
----
Most of the carping seems to me to be about trivia -- Kerry opponents who are desperate for a basis to attack him can't deny that he was in Vietnam, that he came under fire, that he was wounded more than once, that he was decorated, etc., so they try to raise phony questions about what color underwear the treating physician was wearing.  (Now, before anyone accuses me of being snide, let me make clear that I know no one has raised that particular point -- at least not yet.  I'm exaggerating for effect.  It's not snideness, it's a recognized literary technique known as hyperbole.)  I'm not impressed by the evidence they've offered, but rather than waste a lot of time arguing about it, or working out a finely calibrated presentation of every minute item than anyone can think of to quarrel about, I think it would be simpler to finesse many of the contested points.  Case in point: the shrapnel.  There's documentary evidence that the doctor removed it.  Rex speculates that maybe Kerry removed it.  I think the evidence supports the former viewpoint, but, in the interest of not spending eternity arguing about this foolishness, I'm willing to let Rex's persistence pay off to the extent of some unwarranted weakening of the narration.  We can simply say that the shrapnel was removed.  We'll just have to leave it vague whether it was removed by Kerry, the doctor, or the Shrapnel Fairy.  (That snideness isn't mine.  It's a reference to a snide comment Hawkeye Pierce made in an episode of M*A*S*H.) JamesMLane 02:18, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Choghtu Khong Tayiji

message: *Okada Hidehiro 岡田英弘, Čoɤtu Qong Tayiǰi ni tsuite Čoɤtu Qong Tayiǰi について, Ajia Afurika gengo kenkyū 1 アジア・アフリカ言語研究 1, February 1968, pp. 111-125. He provided a brief biography of Choghtu Khong Tayiji and the inscription of Čaɤan bayising.
*Yamaguchi Zuihō 山口瑞鳳, Chibetto チベット, University of Tokyo Press, 1988. He utilized Tibetan materials. His paper  is also cited by Okada's work. Kojitsu Kan no Chibetto shihai ni itaru keii 顧実汗のチベット支配に至る経緯, Iwai Daisetsu hakushi koki kinen tenseki ronshū  岩井大慧博士古希記念典籍論集, 1963.
*Oyunbilig 乌云毕力格, 关于绰克图台吉 On Choktu Taidji, 内蒙古大学学报 哲学社会科学版 1987 No.3, pp.52-57.
--Nanshu 02:30, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: 乌云毕力格: 绰克图台吉的历史和历史记忆, Quaestiones Mongolorum Disputatae, No. 1, pp. 196-225, 2005.
--Nanshu (talk) 23:08, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The meaning of the name Tsog is usually perceived as spark or flame from the Mongolian language. But it may be the Tibetan word meaning sangha. Like in the names Tsoggyal (Tsogzol), Tsogdog etc. However, this should be clarified, it's my guess only. Gantuya eng (talk) 06:06, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Tsog, Tsogt or Chogtu

message: He had a spiritual title "cohur" (цөхүр) or something like that. It should be mentioned somewhere. Gantuya eng (talk) 06:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spiritual title

message: Genghis Khan: A Biography by Zofia Stone, ISBN: 9789386367112
[books link]
Perhaps this should be included as a reference since the text of this article is quite close to the three or so paragraphs directly following the first occurrence of "Tsogtu Khuntaiji".  Though of course, this book would have been written based on earlier sources, perhaps those already referenced.  Either way, being able to pull up a citation online would still be quite useful to many people.  Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phdye (talk • contribs) 06:45, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Reference
Talk:Battle of Sari Bair

message: This battle was the ending point of the campaign and had important political effects. Yet it lacks the Turkish point of view just like all the other Dardanelles battles. Throughout the article only British Empire actions are told while Turkish forces are explained with a couple of words or short sentences. Whoever wrote this article needs to be fair with both sides of the battle. When one reads this, it sounds like the British lost the battle by itself. Nothing is known about what the Turkish have done.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.231.158.66 (talk) 11:05, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack Turkish POW 

message: Pasted in a list of references ready to use for citations. Added a Footnote section.Keith-264 (talk) 14:47, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  references 

message: Articles is semi-protected for a couple of weeks to stop persistent sockpuppetry from one editor. Apologies to any new contributor prevented from making legitimate edits to the article while this protection lasts; please feel free to post those legitimate edit suggestions here instead along with the edit request template. -- Euryalus (talk) 08:45, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected for 2 weeks
Talk:Las Vegas Raiders

message: The team is using three jerseys, using the alternate jersey as recently as the Oct. 4 Chargers game.--Jeff (talk) 11:12, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't the alternate uniform be displayed in the current uniform picture? 

message: These paragraphs have been bothering me for a few weeks:
Clearly biased language against the NFL that has remained untouched, for some reason, for years. I'd edit it myself, but I forgot my password and foolishly did not tie my account to an email. 2607:FEA8:3BA0:4220:B523:74E5:4916:3931 (talk) 18:07, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: Las Vegas Nevada residents are demanding accountability from the State for misappropriation of funds that should have gone to school system. 4.35.33.4 (talk) 00:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nevada Residents Set To Sue State Over Las Vegas Raiders 

message: According to this page "The Raider Nation is the unofficial name for the fans of the Las Vegas Raiders."
According to the link to Raider Nation that this page links to "Raider Nation is the official name for the fans of the National Football League (NFL)'s Las Vegas Raiders"
Which statement is accurate?2A02:C7C:5F61:5000:5D61:2863:54D8:935A (talk) 15:47, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raider nation, official or not? 

message: Under Division championships, there are two 1970 listings.  The one for the 12-1-1 season should be 1969. 174.45.48.197 (talk) 15:25, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Tollens (talk) 19:16, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 September 2023 

message: The redirect Raiders (NFL Team) (2020-present) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Hey man im josh (talk) 19:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Raiders (NFL Team) (2020-present)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:List of programs broadcast by Global Television Network

message: ----
I'm deleting the primetime schedule. It changes so often, and varies so much from region to region. Kirjtc2 03:32, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: Without a volunteer to constantly maintain this page it will become out of date, again, within a few weeks of any time that it is repaired. Perhaps it would be better just to delete it.
:The beauty of Wikipedia is that ANYONE can edit it; if you see outdated information, feel free to update the page. There's no reason to delete an article simply because it is "outdated".  █ EMARSEE 02:30, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difficult to Maintain 

message: If the date ranges cannot be substantiated with references, I plan to cut them. Content must meet WP:V. So far, this is a glorified TV Guide list that doesn't meet WP:V. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced date ranges 

message: Global Shows
Sharon, Lois & Bram Sing A to Z
The KangaZoo Club 2607:FEA8:C220:AD5:4D4D:663:7BBD:8CAA (talk) 00:15, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sing A to Z is an album, not a TV show.  Ttwaring (talk) 00:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global Television Network
Category talk:British military trainer aircraft

message: I don't know if anybody is reading this, but isn't this a little specialised? I mean there are only about three training aircraft serving with the RAF for each decade after WW2 - wouldn't one category for training aircraft be enough.
Incidentally, should each aircraft be listed in all the decades it served, or just the decade it first entered service? DJ Clayworth 04:04, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Self number

message: Any applications? - Highwind
:Probably not. But mathematicians and number aficionados are very interested in them just the same. PrimeFan 22:50, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: I'm embarrassed about this, but I have to admit it. For the first draft of this article, I wrote "self number or Colombian number," where I should have written "self number or Columbian number." That's the spelling given both by Mathworld and the OEIS. It's an alternate term, but there is still a lot of older literature that uses it, so I apologize for screwing it up. PrimeFan 18:27, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colombian and Columbian numbers 

message: What does the k stand for in the formula? --Shandris 07:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's just a convenient running variable. m might be just as suitable. The reason n is not used is that it would lead one to expect that the recurrence relation gives all self numbers, when in fact it just gives an incomplete though infinite list. PrimeFan 15:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  k 

message: Is there a technical term? ie, "The -blah- of 30 in base ten is 24 because 24+2+4=30.". Also, why aren't all single-digit numbers self-numbers? ✍ (talk) 17:40, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know a term for the other number(s). There may be more than one, for example for 101 = 91+9+1 = 100+1+0+0. Even single-digit numbers d > 0 cannot be self numbers, because d/2 can be used as the other number: d/2+d/2 = d. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

text: According to Trotter - Charlene numbers, Kaprekar who first described the self number called such an other number a generator, so "A generator of 30 in base ten is 24 because 24+2+4=30." Trewal (talk) 10:28, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Other number"

message: I found if I use Kaprekar's expression to compute self number, 29 is also self number. But 19 is a generator of 29. So anybody know what's wrong with this problem?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.22.21.11 (talk) 11:28, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume you refer to Self number#Effective test. When I use it I get the self numbers given in the lead: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 20, 31, 42, 53, 64, 75, 86, 97, 108, 110, 121, 132, 143, 154, 165, 176, 187, 198, 209, 211, 222, 233, 244, 255, 266, 277, 288, 299, 310, 312, 323, 334, 345, 356, 367, 378, 389, 400, 411, 413, 424, 435, 446, 457, 468, 479, 490, 501, 512, 514, 525. There is no 29 so I guess you evaluated the expression incorrectly. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:21, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaprekar's expression is wrong?
Talk:Elizabeth Bowen

message: I've restored the mention of the ML lists here, only because this is a stub and there's nothing else to indicate that she's an important 20th century novelist as opposed to some random hack.  When this article gets fleshed out we can remove the ML mention. Gamaliel 05:10, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Removed 'spam'.
24.98.6.151 23:13, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed 'spam' 

message: For the time being, I deleted "She may have suffered from strangury in 1912-1920" from the section headed Assessment.  First, it's not sourced (and a quick search turns up nothing except this article to support the claim); second, it doesn't form an appropriate part of the Assessment section; third, I am not sure it's notable - I am not familiar with the disease, but if she suffered from headaches or a cough or indigestion during that period, I am not sure it would be notable absent some explicit impact on her life or work.KD Tries Again (talk) 20:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Strangury

message: Did she write a poem about death? 2A00:23C6:EB8F:CA01:5957:AC7:DCD1:70E3 (talk) 14:17, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death poem
Wikipedia talk:Sound/Archive1

message: After a lot of discussion and a period on Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment
without any dissent, this page has been created to relax the previous Wikipedia '.ogg' only sound file policy.
It replaces the previous pages:
*Wikipedia:Sound_help
*Wikipedia:Sound_and_Wikipedia
--Zarni02 08:53, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: I haven't yet digested these new recommendations in general, but one exception I have to the sound link placement is that it would be useful to provide a pronunciation link next to the first use of a phrase that might cause readers some pronunciation difficulty (e.g., Abu Ghraib). As far as I know, my concern is only theoretical at this point, since I've neither contributed nor even seen any such pronunciation samples yet. -- Jeff Q 23:17, 16 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation guides 

message: I keep whining about how few people make explicit their desired uses for Wikipedia sound. Well, I'll shut up about it if people could just add to the list below whatever they currently use or expect to use sound for in Wikipedia pages. I think it will help us understand the scope of and potential users for sound, so we can better determine how to make it easier for all without introducing more problems (like legal liabilities and complex setups) than necessary. If you wish, you can add your user name (with the ~~~ markup) to allow others to ask for further details "offline", so we don't clutter this list. -- Jeff Q 08:07, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia uses for sound
Talk:Narnia (town)

message: Hi, I'm pretty much the person maintaining the Narni page.  It seems as though the Narnia page is more or less text copied from the Narni page, which seems like needless duplication.  Also, it'll be bad when people add text to one and not the other.  If possible, I'd like to just inline part of the Narnia page into Narni's page so the Roman history of Narni is all in one place.  Is this possible with Wikipedia?  Thanks in advance and forgive the newbie.
--Senor fjord 05:55, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Narni vs. Narnia
Talk:Count Saint-Germain

message: My original intent was to write an article about the fictional character of Saint-Germain that is the basis of a series of novels by Chelsea Quinn Yarbro. But I got side-tracked into revising the article on the historical character and I'm sure many people will be upset with the results. (Although I tried to reduce the unbelievable aspects of his history as I revised.)
It's difficult to write an objective article about the historical Count Saint-Germain because while there indisputably was such a person the objective evidence is almost non-existent and we have to rely on statements he made or that were made about him by his contemporaries. But it's impossible to read even just the eyewitness statements without realizing how many people fell for his reputation. I don't beleive Saint-Germain was an immortal, but it's clear many of his contemporaries did and made statements based on this belief. So seperating out the facts from the fallacies is almost impossible. The best suggestion I can make is to treat Saint-Germain as a semi-mythological figure like Achilles or Gilgamesh. MK 06:00, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Chayito Valdez

message: Cut from article: "En 2003 en homenaje por parte de la Comisión Nacional de Culturas Populares, se presentó en la Cd. de Culiacán Sinaloa, el libro "ENTRE BESOS Y COPAS", tributo a la más sinaloense de las cantantes de ese estado mexicano." - Jmabel | Talk 05:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please write in English 

message: Pistoleros famsoso II must be a typo. I'd guess Pistoleros famosos II, but I don't know the film, & it might be something even farther off. - Jmabel | Talk 00:08, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo, presumably
Talk:Cockslap

message: From VfD:
"A cockslap or cockslapping is the act of slapping another person with one's own penis or a dildo." Neologism-y dicdef. And, really, isn't the meaning evident from the word? Tregoweth 06:52, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC)
*del Salasks 08:25, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC)
*Delete Cutler 10:32, Aug 6, 2004 (UTC)
*Keep, (i wrote it ). First i would like to say that your reason for listing it here is invalid, listing something at VFD simply because it states nothing more than the painfully obvious AND is labelled as a stub means it needs expantion, not deletion. Anyway it's about a valid article about a sub-cultural *ahem* phenomena. --  Ævar Arnfjör› [ Bjarmason]   10:37, 2004 Aug 6 (UTC)
* We tend to have very good sexology topics; but how can this be expanded?  History of cockslapping?  cockslapping in Iceland? User:Ævar Arnfjör› Bjarmason should clean this up if he wants to keep it; as it is now, my vote is to  delete; it encourages kidi-wiki neologia Dunc_Harris|☺ 12:16, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Makoto Shinkai

message: " around the time of PlayStation 2 and the introduction of DVDs"
Why is this relevant? It helps to put things in context, but did he work on the PS2 or DVDs at the time? Some other reason? GunnarRene 00:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that I know of. _dk 01:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  PS2 and DVD 

message: He also is credited with the animation of a music video by Hiromi Iwasaki: "Egao (The Smile)" CFLeon (talk) 20:35, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unlisted Music Video
Talk:Order of the Dannebrog

message: The page seems to borrow very heavily from http://www.denmarkemb.org/chivalry.html . It does not look like the usual copyvio, though. So I thought I would ask on the page first. Do we have permission to use this text? It is marked as © Copyright 2002 Royal Danish Embassy and GlobeScope, Inc..
Rasmus (talk) 08:00, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The text mentioned above is now located at http://www.ambwashington.um.dk/en/menu/InformationaboutDenmark/Culture/DanishNationalSymbols/The+Danish+Orders+of+Chivalry/ . If I still don't get any responses, I am afraid we need to remove the text. It is a shame, since quite a few people seems to have made an effort to improve it. Rasmus (talk) 11:24, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 

message: Does someone know how to make a category for, First Order class Grand Cross and Commander 1st Degree.
Then make a list like the List of Grand Commanders of the Dannebrog. (Ice Explorer (talk) 13:51, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make list of First Order class 

message: This site should be moved to Order of Dannebrog. Order of the Dannebrog is wrong.. If the current name is to be correct the order should be called dannebrogensorder in Danish.. Skibden (talk) 21:28, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it shouldn't be moved. The English language does use an article in "Order of the Danish flag", i.e. Order of the Dannebrog. Also, per WP:English Wikipedia uses the most common English name for subjects in page naming, so even if the most popular English term was "Dannebrogensorder" which is obviously wrong in Danish we'd still use it. De728631 (talk) 23:41, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page 

message: is this a de facto or de jure use of the order? Is it a written rule? how strictly is it followed? 98.206.155.53 (talk) 19:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  diplomatic use 

message: I may have missed it, but it seems not once in this article is it stated that "Dannebrog" is the Danish national flag, and not once is Flag of Denmark wikilinked (e.g. as a pipe from Dannebrog). Not sure where to do it, but it should be done!--Nø (talk) 12:02, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dannebrog flag
Talk:De La Salle University, Manila

message: I think we should only put in information that has enduring interest into this article. No offense meant to the persons involved, but do we really need to know who the current student council president is? And what will happen to this article once the council president changes in the following year? This is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a journal. --Ronaldo Guevara 08:41, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Reciprocal link

message: Paragraphs removed from article, not particualarly relevant nor encylopedic (imo):
:The concept can be described using the following analogy: when Romeo loves Julia AND Julia loves Romeo, there is reciprocity or mutualness in that love. What Romeo gets from Julia, Julia gets from Romeo. What Romeo gives to Julia, Julia gives to Romeo. 
:In a simple diagram you could have two symbols for Romeo and Julia and two arrows between them for the love stream. The fact that there are two identical arrows to and fro two entities completes the reciprocity of that relation.Iainscott 08:51, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)

message: "Automatic link exchange" just looks like a repository of spam links. If anything useful can be merged in, please do so; I will be blanking & redirecting it in a week or two. Eleland 13:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Fred Barnes (performer)

message: This reads like a magazine article - what's the source, and is it copyright? Andy Mabbett 10:57, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry. I wrote a short bio on Fred Barnes as a voluntary contribution to a local magazine, this is a version of it. There won't be a problem as i own any rights to this piece. --Air luigi 14:17, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you. Andy Mabbett 14:31, 6 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  source of the Fred Barnes info.
Talk:Kazimir Malevich

message: Change spelling of the capital of Ukraine from Kiev to Kyiv, please – on the basis of
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KyivNotKiev 
Ukrainian pronunciation of the city. MakSpace (talk) 15:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In progress: An editor is implementing the requested edit. Shadow311 (talk) 15:49, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Shadow311 (talk) 16:05, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the edit as it explicitly contradicts the community consensus at Talk:Kyiv. There is a good reason why this page is protected. Ymblanter (talk) 21:39, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2023 

message: Ukrainian artist 173.70.150.80 (talk) 00:38, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: see above Cannolis (talk) 01:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 27 February 2024 

message: Kazimir actually is a Ukrainian artist. Kindly change the information here. 37.73.20.177 (talk) 22:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No, he was not. Ymblanter (talk) 18:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality