lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Agua Prieta

message: From the intro: "the 2005 census the town had a population of 68,402 people" .... "The municipality's population was 70,303 at the 2005 census".  Which is it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.243.31.189 (talk) 02:40, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the list complete or waiting to be filled out?
Given how long Agua Priest has been around, is the list supposed to indicate that there were years/decades in which there were no mayors?
This needs to be clarified.
I have paperwork from December 1965 that is signed by a "non-elected mayor" ("sufragio efectivo.-no reeleccion") and witnessed/signed by the mayor's office secretary.  However, given the lack of an intro or info in the "List of Mayors" section, I hesitate to add in the name I have.
Can anything be done to fix or clarify?
Just curious. 2600:8800:784:8F00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 07:07, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of mayors
Talk:Bacoachi

message: I wonder how someone can say, "The population has been decreasing due to immigration to the United States of America," when the statistics to back such a statement are not available.  Statistics of numbers of immigrants from which cities / states are not kept by either the Mexican or American governments since the activity is illegal.  The author has not even established that the population has decreased, much less for any particular reason.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.153.122 (talk) 04:00, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Bavispe

message: This is really just to remind myself to look this up in Richard Fisher's book when I get back to Arizona. Cool name, neat-looking place in his photos. Nothing on Google, surprisingly. Anybody here been there? Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 05:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gates of Bavispe
Talk:Notosetia

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  ----Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:33, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Hulme Walfield

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using WP:UKCITIES as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using WP:UKCITIES
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.) Unreferenced claims may be deleted without notice.  DDStretch  (talk) 17:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 
Talk:Nacozari de García

message: I suggest Nacozari de García Municipality be merged with this page. The municipality page is a tiny stub unworthy of a page by itself. Michael E Nolan (talk) 01:37, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Herbert Armitage James

message: The article is generally OK, but in several places the prose is choppy and terse. It also seems to be a little too concise. I think a little expansion, maybe more detail, would be appropriate.
:I hope that my expansions meet with your approval. As you might have gathered, I did not always agree that the sentences were too short, but have only stuck with the old version on one occasion! BencherliteTalk 23:18, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: General

message: Review of Herbert Armitage James
#Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:: 
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#:: 
After making the changes suggested in my previous review, I think this article is now a Good Article. Congratulations. Noble Story (talk) 02:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! BencherliteTalk 02:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Final GA Review

message: Was this fellow actually called "Herbert Armitage James"? Or was he "Herbert James"? Or, as this suggests, in fact "Armitage James" (forename surname)? In which case, should the article not be at Armitage James? DBD 12:43, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:COMMONNAME|Common name]]
Talk:Somerford, Cheshire

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using WP:UKCITIES as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using WP:UKCITIES
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.) Unreferenced claims may be deleted without notice.  DDStretch  (talk) 17:52, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Notosetia aoteana

message: This article was based on Powell A. W. B., New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 . It has been revised on this date to eliminate a probable copyright violation of that book. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion.) Thank you.  ----Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:32, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:The Chronicles of Amber (omnibus)

message: Since there are multiple books published with the title (or sub-title) "Chronicles of Amber", I was wondering how best to reference them in this "The Chronicles of Amber (omnibus)" article.  On first reading the article appeared to be (only) about the 1999 SFBC publication titled The First Chronicles of Amber - but then it seems the article's title was wrong (incomplete / imprecise).  Since there have been several similarly-titled publications sometimes containing very different* content, I thought it might help to describe these 'other' publications more explicitly in the article itself.  I have added some new text with references to the various "...Chronicles of Amber..." publications to date (mid 2012) that (I hope) makes the distinctions clear.  I also added infoboxes for each of the mentioned books in order to capture cover art, detailed publication info, cover artist info, etc. for each of these anthologies.  I'm not certain this is "proper" Wikipedia format (is there a consensus against including multiple infoboxes in a single article?) but it seemed to make things clearer (to me) / solved a few problems without burdening the article itself with additional descriptive text.  If the additional infoboxes are later removed, I hope the remover finds an elegant way to capture some of the infobox info in the article itself and minimize ambiguity.  
: *e.g. The Chronicles of Amber, Volume 2 and The Second Chronicles of Amber have completely different content.  
Pugetbill (talk) 15:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  To which book(s) does / should this article refer?
Talk:North Lawn

message: North Lawn of the White House might be a less parochial title. --Wetman (talk) 06:08, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Even better. --Wetman (talk) 13:21, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment 1

message: In the United States, Executive Mansion more often refers to a state's Governor's Mansion than the White House. There is an archaic association that doesn't feel like contemporary spoken language. Almost a bit like referring to our country as "these United States," or greeting someone on the street with "good day to you, sir." I prefer to avoid repeated use of White House, but  the house officially ceased being the Executive Mansion in 1901, when Theodore Roosevelt, made fact what had already been de facto for 100 years. 
On the whitehouse.gov site I find the references are rare and in historical context, as in "At various times in history, the White House has been known as the "President's Palace," the "President's House," and the "Executive Mansion." President Theodore Roosevelt officially gave the White House its current name in 1901." The White House Historical Association, an organization charged with interpreting the history of the White House, on its website uses the term in historical context but not as an interchangeable name for the house today. I've tried both "the house" and "the mansion" to avoid reuse of White House. CApitol3 (talk) 04:19, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of Executive Mansion

message: Does anyone know the present location of the statue of Thomas Jefferson that stood on the North Lawn from 1848 until 1871? That information and a close-up of the statue would be good additions to the page. Thanks. Randy Kryn 23:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Statue of Thomas Jefferson
Talk:Vincent Ferrini

message: ===Notability===
This individual may fall under a realm of regionally notable people, but without independent corroboration, I cannot assume this.
===Tone===
There is a more flowery, poetic tone concerning this individual, to which I attribute its being created and edited by the subject's son.
===Wikify===
There are some technical issues, along with punctuation, that need to be addressed.  There are symbols appearing instead of standard text, which generally should not in an English article.
- CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article issues

message: There are some technical issues, along with punctuation, that need to be addressed.  There are symbols appearing instead of standard text, which generally should not in an English article.
- CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikify]]
Talk:Minisink Archaeological Site

message: Removing geodata and location information for this site is essentially ridiculous because it is already well-known as a matter of public record (in many accessible public government documents and other easily-obtainable publications). Any lamebrained vague fear of looting the site is ridiculous. No one has looted this site in the 30 years that I've known of it and I live a few miles away. And after Herbert Kraft's digs a few decades ago there isn't anything valuable at the site anymore anyway.  If we're going to remove location information because of fears of theft and looting that are just fears, you either remove such information from every historical/artistic/archaeological site listed at Wikipedia or from none of them--none of this irrational piecemeal crap.--ColonelHenry (talk) 19:19, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fears of looting and removing location information. 
Talk:Connected-component labeling

message: I intend to clean up this article and list a few of the common algorithms (2-pass rasterization for example).
Charlie.liban (talk) 18:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, and I completely forgot to add a description to the revision. Charlie.liban (talk) 05:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Added an image for clarification. Charlie.liban (talk) 05:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I don't think so. Removed. --Prydeson (talk) 21:37, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

text: I'll look into it. Voxel CCL is of interest to biomedical imaging, so you may find some information in papers related to that. -charlie liban (talk) 17:06, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

text: The whole article is looking a bit cluttered for such a simple concept. I'll try and clarify this with better pseudocode. -charlie liban (talk) 21:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

text: This could still use some help. It's not clear what the linked sets are used for; they're never read, as near as I can tell. 76.104.197.185 (talk) 04:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

text: MATLAB from the looks of it -charlie liban (talk) 21:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is definitely not MATLAB: := is not a thing, and neither is end for. It could be Octave, but I doubt it. The end for would have to be endfor at the very least. I don't know if there's a := in Octave either. Mr. Neo Anderson (talk) 15:55, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Don't need stack for 'One component at a time' for depth-first search. 
Whatever is pushed on is immediately popped off!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pdavidow (talk • contribs) 00:07, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't need stack for 'One component at a time' DFS 

message: is a better graphic than the current 4-connected and 8-connected on this page. 206.223.175.102 (talk) 12:40, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the author of this graphic is trying to show that the CCL proceeds with preferred directions.  What is missing it that pixel connectivity is limited to euclidean (up/down, left/right) vs allowing diagonals.  I think that is too many concepts at once. I only guess the preferred direction from having seen an algorithm in ImageJ. For example Wand.java. 206.223.175.102 (talk) 12:47, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphic of connectivity
Talk:NickMusic

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved Unneeded; I have a calendar and we'll move it on Friday the proper way and this is just unneeded bureaucracy; until then it's still MTV Hits. Please stop complicating cable network renaming page moves, just wait until the day and move it. Nate • (chatter) 00:20, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: MTV Hits →  – On September 9, 2016, MTV Hits will become NickMusic. AdamDeanHall (talk) 17:32, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 September 2016 

message: I removed info that violates WP:V - I have seen that info on a message board, which isn't a reliable source to begin with. Arbor to SJ (talk) 22:42, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for first music video as NickMusic? 

message: Hi,  
It says NickMusic is available on dish network.  Look on their site it say MTV hits yet but doesn't say nick music?   It says vh1 classic becomes MTV hits though under new channels.  But also says in the article it's the last station not available on dish?   Which is correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by None42 (talk • contribs) 02:15, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Many listings sources haven't quite got the transition down yet; rest assured that NickMusoc has replaced MTVH on all systems and this isn't like the Nick GAS/TeenNick transition that took two years to finally end. Nate • (chatter) 05:30, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification question
Talk:Trade marketing

message: ==Neutrality==
The very first paragraph shows that this is a biased article--does not fit within Wikipedia's NPOV policy.
:Would you please detail what in the very first paragraph makes you believe that this is a biased article? Thanks. --Chapultepec (talk) 09:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The very first paragraph shows that this is a biased article--does not fit within Wikipedia's NPOV policy.
:Would you please detail what in the very first paragraph makes you believe that this is a biased article? Thanks. --Chapultepec (talk) 09:59, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Template talk:National sports teams of the United Kingdom

message: This is not a UK team. It is a joint team belonging to England, Scotland, Wales and Ireland (including the Republic). If the Republic of Ireland were not involved then it might be considered s British team. As it is the team does not use the Union Jack and there is no God Save the Queen.GordyB (talk) 18:37, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed link to British and Irish Lions
Talk:La Silla Observatory

message: There's a lack of information on this page.
Eg.g why did the ESO build in Chile?
What were the ups and downs?? 157.190.228.23 (talk) 18:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The skies in Chile are very dark. -- Kheider (talk) 08:12, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of info 

message: Assessed to C (from Start/Stub), although it looks rather like a "B"-class article to me. Rfassbind – talk  14:53, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article's quality scale 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:A 360 degree panorama of a unique cloudscape over La Silla.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 9, 2018. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2018-02-09. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:23, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:A 360 degree panorama of a unique cloudscape over La Silla.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Morly Grey

message: It is interesting that Morly Grey is labeled as a Christian band. The only indicator seems to be a single reference to a rare vinyl LP from  with the title  "Orig. '69 Xian Hard Rock Sealed MORLY GREY - PSYCH", with the assumption that "Xian" refers to Christian (a quick search in Google does not even reveal that Xian means Christian). There may be other clues, such as the album's artwork, which appears to be the head of man wearing a crown of thorns, a reference to Jesus Christ being crucified on the cross. However, the title of an auction is not definitive proof that the band had Christian origins. All music services and catalogs categorize Morly Grey simple as "rock" or "progressive rock" with no indication that it has any ties to Christian or other religious genres. I think before we stick with the Christian categorization, we need more verification on the bands origins - otherwise we will be spreading false information.
JamesPino (talk) 18:47, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Ruth Winters (Casualty)

message: Unfortunately I seem unable to make a redirect from the Ruth Winters listed in the Casualty Cast page to the page that contains my article on Ruth Winters. Every time I try, it goes wrong although I have read the redirect pages. The redirect in this article now leads to the Casualty cast page rather than to nowhere. Ideally it should be the other way round. I'll modify the mistakes in the article as much as possible as it would be a shame to delete the article. --Lizzie Brookes (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Fat Tuesday

message: I think that Fat Tuesday definitely needs its own article, like Ash Wednesday. It's a religious feast day, and most people (& families) in the US don't even celebrate "Mardi Gras", but they enjoy Fat Tuesday. They should be an article on the day, its history, and its traditions. It's not Mardi Gras, it's simply on the same day. This is the same reason Shrove Tuesday has its own article (even though its on the same day as "Mardi Gras"). I know it means Fat Tuesday in French, but it's viewed as a party day, while Fat Tuesday is viewed as a religious day. They don't seem to go hand in hand. Plus, why would the English Wikipedia have the Fat Tuesday article under its French name? The article hardly says anything what the religious day is about. нмŵוτнτ 18:51, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs it own article
Talk:Pele

message: This page keeps getting hijacked.  Please stop redirecting Pele to your favorite soccer players.  There's several popular peles and they all need to be listed. Lythic (talk)Lythic
: The footballer is primary usage. Other Peles are listed at Pele (disambiguation).Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 23:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you ask me, Pele the goddess of Hawaiian mythology is the primary usage. Personally, the redirect to the disambiguation page seems like the right path. I don't give a flying hoot about the soccer player. When I type in Pele without an accent, I expect to be redirected to the goddess, not the soccer player. However, since most people don't know how to accent mark their letters, the disambiguation seems logical. 71.38.145.247 (talk) 12:10, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

text: Current path for a random reader looking for the goddess through the search box: Pele -> Pelé -> Pele (disambiguation) -> Pele (deity). The counts for November for those pages: 18475 -> (98721) -> 1442 -> (7418). So 18K people hit the redirect to the footballer, and only 1.4K of them then go to the disambiguation page. The footballer appears to be the primary topic for "pele". The hatnote on Pelé can be extended, though, to make the path to the goddess Pele -> Pelé -> Pele (deity), if that will help. -- JHunterJ (talk) 13:57, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Pele without diacritics is the goddess, primarily; with diacritics is a football player. It is best to leave this disambiguated. Jonathunder (talk) 14:34, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The primary topic on Wikipedia for "pele" (without the diacritics) appears to be the footballer. Of the 18475 readers who hit the redirect Pele in November and landed on the footballer, no more than 1442 of them (7.8%) decided they were on the wrong page and clicked through to the disambiguation page to find a different topic. The other 92.2% apparently reached the topic they were looking for. -- JHunterJ (talk) 20:22, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirecting
Talk:Sergio Vallín

message: The song "Jalisco Power" alongside Carlos Santana holds special significance to Sergio Vallín.  That was a tour, not a song.  Look at the Spanish Wikipedia it says gira not cancion. I changed it.  If someone wants to get snitty about sources look at the Spanish page.  108.204.18.240 (talk) 16:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: "A los trece años vine con mi familia a Aguascalientes, donde vivo hasta la fecha, aquí fue donde en La Casa de la Cultura y de la mano del Maestro Rosales (qepd), tomé mis primeras clases de guitarra clásica"  i.e. he took classic guitar lessons after his family moved to Aguascalientes when he was 13. The student group was when he was 8, long before the move. This is from the guy's own website https://sergiovallin.com/en/about-me/ But it probably won't count as a valid source because 3 white men haven't written about it in a book yet. I'm going to change it anyway.  108.204.18.240 (talk) 17:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistakes in the bio