lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Libido

message: I don't understand why the only hits for "ejaculation" and "abstinence" in this article are in the Template:Sex at the bottom of the article. Male libido is heavily affected by the time that has passed since the previous ejaculation, correct? --2001:1C06:19CA:D600:7EA8:C71E:2746:5DE0 (talk) 08:50, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Same goes for sexual desire, by the way. That article doesn't have a single hit for "ejaculation". --2001:1C06:19CA:D600:7EA8:C71E:2746:5DE0 (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

text: And what this person asked way back in 2013. Why do we (including Wikipedia) lack the knowledge of the effect of ejaculation on libido and/or sexual desire? Is it affected by "pressure of fluids" as the editor writes? --2001:1C06:19CA:D600:7EA8:C71E:2746:5DE0 (talk) 18:20, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Ejaculation

message: Ok what kind of serious editor, or   cognizant person in general would even for a moment give credence to the clearly incorrect claim that male libido is highest in the “teenage years”?… And then to further claim the even more ridiculous notion that libido/sex drive begins to decline after the age of 15/16? Like you can’t actually be serious right now.. Yes, teenagers are very hormonal and all that, I get it but the  statement about subjective/mental sex drive actually peeking during that time in male development is simply outlandish. I’m actually almost impressed by how absurdly inaccurate such statements are. And I almost even just left it up (with the much needed preface) just so other readers can have a good or uncomfortable laugh when reading such spiel. This edit or study or both was clearly either written by a woman or a 15-year-old boy. How could any male wiki contributor who has reached their 20s or knows how to use Google seriously write such a joke of a statement? Maybe someone on SSRIs  or just with low testosterone who’s simply projecting and scouring the internet for any source at all to affirm their own problems? Maybe even an exceptionally older male who has memory problems? A college kid who takes too much Adderall and decimated their own testosterone levels? I really can’t be sure. I know this dispute doesn’t have to be brought up on the talk page necessarily, but I just really needed to vent about how over the top that claim was. I can barley even comprehend (besides the limited examples I named) what kind of person would write that or even believe it for half a second regardless of what garbage source it’s published in. Dexedream (talk) 20:53, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absurd claims about peak of male libido in relation to age 

message: user:EvergreenFir  can you explain ? 
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Libido&curid=18488&diff=1166287946&oldid=1166266418
- T0t0  Cugn0 (talk) 16:32, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I misread the diffs. I will revert myself EvergreenFir (talk) 17:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  july 2023
Talk:Lord's Prayer/Archive 1

message: JHK - the copy I used from the 1928 Book of Common Prayer is out of copyright - I checked. I don't know about the others. - MMGB— Preceding unsigned comment added by user MMGB (talk • contribs) 00:09, 3 December 2001 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Manning -- as you might guess, it was the others I was worried about! JHK— Preceding unsigned comment added by JHK (talk • contribs) 01:28, 3 December 2001 (UTC)
replies: text:  No probs JHK. By the way, I only discovered you were a gynomorph the other day... (!) For some reason I had always assumed you were male. I'll punish myself for my terrible patriarchal tendencies later. :) - MMGB— Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.210.232.xxx (talk • contribs) 01:36, 3 December 2001 (UTC)
replies: text: No need, although I am interested in finding out why this was the general assumption -- any clues can go on my page! ;-) JHK— Preceding unsigned comment added by JHK (talk • contribs) 01:46, 3 December 2001 (UTC)

text: Who said that Jesus was incapable of sin? Didn't he sin in the desert when he was tempted by the devil? Well, he was human- I was taught that Jesus was like us in that respect (well excuse me if my little Catholic teachings aren't good enough for you). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark (talk • contribs) 06:16, 9 January 2002 (UTC)

text: I agree that the official viewpoint is that he did not sin. The article currently states that he was incapable of sin, which isn't exactly the same thing. I'm not sure how widely held that incapable part is. Part of the point of the Incarnation was to demonstrate that it's possible to be fully human, yet not sin. I think that may be part of why some theologians speculate that the virgin Mary never committed a sin either. Personally, I don't see that experiencing temptation is an imperfection, any more than an umbrella getting wet in the rain is an imperfection. Now an umbrella that leaks water through a tear has a serious imperfection. Kind of like that analogy I just made up.  :-)  --Wesley— Preceding unsigned comment added by user name or IP (talk • contribs) date (UTC)
Temptation is an external force, such as when Jesus was tempted in the desert by Satan (an outside force)...--ThisDude415— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.212.50.132  (talk • contribs) 04:35, 17 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Lexicology

message: I'm surprised at the people in the list of noted lexicologists. Surely Johnson, Larousse and Webster were lexicographers, not lexicologists, while Barthes was a specialist in literary criticism and semiotics. Dougg 09:36, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Noted lexicologists'? 

message: Is there special term for study of neologisms (as a part of lexicology) in English linguistic terminology?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.105.213.130 (talk) 06:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A special term for study of neologisms? 

message: Are these parts of a word morphological or lexicological units? Or is there the difference between root (lexicology) (or root (semantics)) and root (morphology)? There is a separate article on word stem too, and it tells that all roots belong to stems but not vice versa and stems sometimes have morphological meaning (as contrasted to roots? Do roots have only lexicological meaning?).
Puzzled, Kazkaskazkasako (talk) 20:41, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Root (linguistics)|Root]], [[suffix (linguistics)|suffix]], [[prefix (linguistics)|prefix]], [[ending (linguistics)|ending]]...

message: The article states: "The term [lexicology] first appeared in the 1970s." Perhaps the writer is not aware of a reference work called the Oxford English Dictionary. This work, which is pretty well known and which one would think someone working on an article on Lexicology would consult, documents the term back to 1832.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.132.173.152 (talk) 16:43, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surprising Error in This Article 

message: Hello fellow editors,
I recently made edits throughout this article - in summary, I made the article more concise and reworded existing information, as well as added some new info with plenty more citations. The most significant change I made was removing the Bibliography section; i felt that it was redundant given both a References section and an External links section. But perhaps someone could review the old content and re-add it in the form of citations or further reading(s) if they feel the sources should remain with this article. 
Thank you for reviewing my changes! Rosetoval99 (talk) 00:39, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted bibliography
Talk:Leukemia

message: In the infobox, one of the given treatments is "Supportive care", which links to a section on the Therapy page. The first sentence of said section is: "A therapy that does not treat or improve the underlying condition, but instead increases the patient's comfort." Therefore, I don't think it should be labeled as "treatment". You can't therapy Leukemia away. Bataaf van Oranje (Prinsgezinde) (talk) 15:46, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Supportive care, also known as supportive treatment, is a treatment. Not all treatments directly treat or improve the underlying condition but they treat the entire person to help them feel better and enjoy the time they have left more. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:32, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Supportive care isn't talk therapy.  It's things like using oxygen when you are short of breath or taking antibiotics when you have an infection.  Those don't kill leukemia cells, but they are still serious medical treatments.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:34, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Treatment?

message: https://therenegadepharmacist.com/sauna-exposed/
86.168.32.240 (talk) 19:32, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  oi 

message: Proof: https://www.gesundheitlicheaufklaerung.de/elf-wellen-und-mind-control/#Krankheiten_und_Tod_per_Fernsteuerung
--94.134.91.214 (talk) 00:44, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  HAARP causes Leukemia then? It's known to be based on ELF.
Talk:Linux distribution

message: Please include AsteroidOS, it’s a watch OS  2406:7400:92:A2C8:B45C:CCE8:DF07:9990 (talk) 01:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This article includes only a few of the major distributions as examples, it is not an exhaustive list. AsteroidOS is a specialized distribution for smartwatches. - Ahunt (talk) 01:46, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of AsteroidOS 

message: Perhaps this source will be useful, but it does not support the claim it was cited for:
*
—96.8.24.95 (talk) 01:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned source 

message: First sentence says Linux distro is an operating system made from a software collection that includes the Linux kernel and often a package management system. I build Linux for closed embedded systems. There is no distribution aspect/feature/support. It fits the description of the first sentence since it includes the linux kernel. Even though there is no package management system it still fits the first sentence since that says that aspect is only often included. But, it seems to me that a linux OS for a closed system is not a distribution. Therefore, I think the definition (first sentence) should include that it must be intended for distribution to a wide audience.
Later says A Linux distribution may also be described as a particular assortment of application and utility software (various GNU tools and libraries, for example), packaged with the Linux kernel in such a way that its capabilities meet many users' needs. That does imply that a linux OS for a closed system is not a distro. Maybe that's a better first sentence. Stevebroshar (talk) 18:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Do reliable sources reflect this proposed definition? Looking online it doesn't seem that an intent to distribute is an essential aspect of a Linux distribution or that public distribution is what determines if something is a Linux distribution (see for example gLinux). - Aoidh (talk) 21:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is a linux OS a distribution if it's not intended for distrubution?
Talk:Lucretia Mott

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Lucretia Mott, signed photo, by F. Gutekunst.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for January 3, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-01-03. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! --Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 15:29, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ross Yates ii (talk) 16:04, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Global Interconnections
Talk:Language family

message: Parts of the map are very misleading. It seems to be supposed to show the present-day language of the majority population, but this principle is not observed for Canada, which is shown as almost entirely Algic and Na-Dene-Yenisseian, even though it is observed for the US, which is shown as Indo-European. --82.137.111.223 (talk) 02:17, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This actually isn't that misleading, unless the point was that the indigenous people have been culturally assimilated to the point where they lost their language. Most settlers settles in the PIE area (unless the map changed, I didn't check the history of the page.) Robust21 (talk) 17:29, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading part of the map 

message: — Assignment last updated by Fedfed2 (talk) 00:53, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: بيام داد ب شماره ٩٣٧٢٣٠٤١١٩ 2.147.225.229 (talk) 01:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Linguistics in the Digital Age
Talk:Lung cancer

message: Hi, I reverted the following edit so that we can work together to ensure the source and material meets Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine). Here is the edit: "According to a study for which results were presented at American Society of Clinical Ontology (ASCO), the patients who underwent removal of their tumors and subsequently took a specific drug on daily basis experienced a remarkable reduction in almost 51 percent of death risks." JenOttawa (talk) 13:19, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not, even news orgs such as BBC are not considered reliable for medical information. Besides, according to WP:MEDRES, single medical studies are almost never reliable. Ca talk to me! 00:45, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edit on a 'lung cancer pill'

message: So Wikipedia has numerous articles already converting to a semi-protective format and this one, containing sensitive topics, should be no exception. 172.74.203.83 (talk) 13:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: IP 172, the page has been semi-protected for the next day. For the future, the place to request protection is WP:RFPP. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 15:07, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-Protection Request 

message: can you check these citations?  I thought it odd that the page ranges on the two are identical, and wonder if that's a typo?
* Christiani DC, Amos CI (2022). "Lung Cancer: Epidemiology". In Broaddus C, Ernst JD, King TE, et al. (eds.). Murray & Nadel's Textbook of Respiratory Medicine (7th ed.). Elsevier. pp. 1018–1028.
* Massion PP, Lehman JM (2022). "Lung Cancer: Molecular Biology and Targets". In Broaddus C, Ernst JD, King TE, et al. (eds.). Murray & Nadel's Textbook of Respiratory Medicine (7th ed.). Elsevier. pp. 1018–1028.
SandyGeorgia (Talk)  01:03, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent eyes! A typo indeed. I'm sure I copied the template to get the book info and forgot to update the page range. Thank you for catching my mistake. Ajpolino (talk) 14:54, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds jut like something I would do :)  bst, SandyGeorgia (Talk)  15:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source query
Talk:Labour law

message: No mention in the article of legislation relating to chimney sweeps, first British legislation the Chimney Sweepers Act 1788. DuncanHill (talk) 22:39, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chimney sweeps 

message: Do we think this article would be the right place to list union rights?
Like rights outlined in law for Union Delegates and such. EG In Australia Union delegates are recognised in law and have special rights in the workplace. TheGhostGum (talk) 09:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Union Rights
Talk:Leonardo da Vinci

message: Da vinci was a mathematician 89.197.212.158 (talk) 08:29, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.Note that the article is already placed in . jlwoodwa (talk) 19:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

text: he was an artist first and foremost Rumplestilskin49 (talk) 02:35, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 March 2024 

message: what things did he do when was he born and how is hole life went by 105.245.240.23 (talk) 17:32, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe you will find simple:Leonardo da Vinci easier to understand, if English is not your mother tongue. Alternatively, this article is available in 232 different languages: on mobile, click the icon under the word "Article"; on desktop, the icon is at the end of the row with is name on. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leonardo da Vinci story
Talk:International Numbering System for Food Additives

message: The article listed E122, E123, E124, E125, E131 and E142 as approved in the US. It also listed cyclamate as approved in the US. I've updated the table but there are likely a lot of remaining inaccuracies especially claiming US approval. 
https://www.fda.gov/industry/color-additive-inventories/color-additive-status-list
https://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/aspartame-and-other-sweeteners-food
2600:1700:139A:120:4C17:147F:6134:665 (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: A lot of inaccuracies

message: I think there should be some effort to show which of these are or are not FDA approved... I listed as many color numbers as i could find, which is a start --Random832 21:03, 2004 Jun 14 (UTC)
:Have at it.
:*Everything Added to Food in the US
:*PDF Food Additive Status List 2005
:*Summary of Color Additives
:meatclerk 14:19, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 4

message: Please see
* http://jpdb.nihs.go.jp/jp15e/JP15.pdf
for further info
--222.67.218.156 (talk) 10:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The products of polyethylene glycol vary from one to another..... 

message: As both pages provide the same information as list, it is proposed to use in the E-number page only the text, but remove the tables and show in this list with an E whether the additive is allowed within the EU. Creates less work and avoids confusion between the lists.Knorrepoes (talk) 13:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In the INS table there are now columns for Australia and teh EU. Maybe columns for other countries should be added ?Knorrepoes (talk) 13:36, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: E-number list added here

message: *E numbers article merge? I don't think the articles should be merged, if there is substantial information regarding the E numbering system. But it might makes sense to merge the Full list of E numbers on the E numbers page, with this list. --Iantresman (talk) 11:55, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger
Talk:Metallica

message: The redirect Napster Bad! has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:15, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Napster Bad!]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Just wondering why John Marshall was removed from.the touring members section. His rhythm guitar contributions are well known, as mentioned in this article and this article, and some videos on YouTube which can't be used for obvious reasons.  Mewhen123 (talk) 09:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Marshall
Talk:Minimum wage

message: I made a number of edits, the mass reverting and edit warring without leaving any comments within edit notes or on the talk page is inappropriate. Please discuss rather than edit war before we need to visit ani. 2600:1702:3C80:B60:2071:8EBC:E1CB:A1EA (talk) 20:10, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Please give reasons for your changes, and remember that Wikipedia says what Reliable Sources say: WP:RS, not what any one of us thinks is the "correct" or accurate thing to say, please see WP:OR regarding that policy.---Avatar317(talk) 22:25, 28 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good faith edits 

message: @Avatar317 I don't have a strong opinion which rates should be in the article, however I just checked the number for Spain in the cited OECD stats page and it is given there equal 10.6 USD PPPs / hour in 2020; for other countries the numbers also do not seem to match. Maybe I got something wrong, maybe the entire table should be double-checked and corrected. Birdofpreyru (talk) 19:01, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That's strange; you're right, some of the numbers are off.  I thought I double-checked some of the entries when this table was added and they were correct...I wonder if the OECD possibly revised their PPP inflation deflator?  Wow! Maybe they did; this InternetArchive link shows different numbers on 2021-12-01 than now (I can't seem to get the hourly on the archive, but the yearly is different between then and now)  - maybe we should list the day the source was read?  That's a little funky that they are (potentially) revising their inflation numbers (at least that's my best guess as to why these numbers are different)...strange... ---Avatar317(talk) 20:42, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minimum Wages Table