lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Barun Goyot Formation

message: This formation is "4 inches thick"..?!  Really? Thanks. News you can use. You might as well say it's 4 miles thick.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.150.248.73 (talk) 05:27, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Added the thickness in millimeters, if that helps...? MMartyniuk (talk) 11:48, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geology 

message: Hi , you redirected Red Beds of Khermeen Tsav here, citing this paper, but as far as I can see, the Hermiin Tsav area corresponds to several formations, also including the Nemegt (and transitions between them)? I don't see the red beds mentioned seperately in that paper, but your edits to Catopsbaatar would imply that it only corresponds to Barun Goyot. I'm not sure about the details, s would be good to clarify (I think the info could be conveyed better at Catopsbaatar, but should go in detail under paleoecology). FunkMonk (talk) 20:14, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Per the paper  It is also repeatedly noted in the paper that the Nemegt formation is Gray-Tan in comparison to the underlying Barun Goyot Formation  In contrast to:  The Hermiin Tsav localities that Catopsbataar is known from Khermeen Tsav II, Middle Red Beds and Khermeen Tsav I, Red Beds are clearly identifed as Barun Goyot, while the White beds are identified as Nemegt on PaleobioDB. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:46, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

text: It's worth noting that there are several  other papers that explicitly state that Khermeen Tsav I and II are part of the Barun Goyot Formation (see 1 2 for instance) Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:54, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting, I'm not sure PaleoDB is reliable enough to use as a source. I'll see if I can tweak the text in the Catopsbaatar article somehow to make it smoother... FunkMonk (talk) 20:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done some rejigging of the text so that discussion of stratigraphy stays under paleoenvironment. FunkMonk (talk) 02:56, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hermiin Tsav 
Talk:Cedar Mountain Formation

message: Can we get a reference for the claim of spinosaurid teeth being found in this formation? I can find nothing about it online, and AFAIK there are currently no confirmed spinosaurids from North America. 209.136.39.130 (talk) 17:46, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Dakota Formation

message: I think that the article at Dakota Sandstone should be merged into this one. It is shorter and less encyclopedic. --Bejnar (talk) 06:09, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok.--Tranletuhan (talk) 05:54, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: As noted above, there was contention about merging Dakota classifications. Sequentially, the Dakota name applies to, generally, the lowest marine-influenced terrestrial sediments of the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway.  The various locations have been corelated biostratigraphically by analysis of pollen, and the units have been physically traced through the range of usage. Breaking things down by state is problematic as the different conventions cross state lines. The primary case in point is Colorado, where each of the three main usages are applied.
# "East Shore" plains where Dakota Formation includes shales and mudstone with the sandstones.
# "Southwest" where marine shales and mudstones(?) are assigned to the Mancos and Dakota Sandstone applies specifically to the sandstone base and to the sandstone intertonguings with the Mancos (e.g., Twowells Tounge of the Dakota).
# "Mid-seaway Northern Colorado" Dakota Group where the Lytle and the Skull Creek cycle are occasionally included.
I want to attempt here to catalog more recent descriptions of the Dakota classifications for possible future citations.
* Regional stratigraphic cross sections of Cretaceous rocks from east-central Arizona to the Oklahoma Panhandle - traces Dakota Sandstone classification along the New Mexico-Colorado border  through the San Jan Basin (with attention paid to the intertonguing) to and through the Raton basin.
(More to insert here)
IveGoneAway (talk) 15:37, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating usage?
Talk:Argiles et Grès à Reptiles Formation

message: The record of Megalosaurus pannoniensis is based on remains described by Lapparent (1947) that actually belong to a dromaeosaurid (Allain and Taquet 2000). 
Allain, R., and Taquet, P. (2000). "A new genus of Dromaeosauridae (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of France." Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 20: 404-407. 
Lapparent, 1947. Les dinosauriens du Crétacé supérieur du midi de la France. Mémoire de la Société géologique de France. 56, 1-54. 68.4.28.33 (talk) 18:42, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Megalosaurus pannoniensis
Talk:Electrical enclosure

message: "This material is chosen because it is the least electrically conductive metal, therefore, it has a high electrical resistance." Say what??? Aluminum has the lowest resistivity second only to copper and silver. The reasons for using aluminum may be light weight, or ease of manufacture (specifically casting). Perhaps the writer was confused by the fact that anodized aluminum has a high resistance coating of oxide. This however is not useful as electrical insulation, as it is easily breached by sharp objects.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.101.156.3 (talk) 16:01, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thx for pointing that out – I've changed the statements according to the source. --Zac67 (talk) 17:15, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aluminum Enclosures 

message: Mention the coordinates found on their cement bases or sides are the same as Utility_pole#Coordinates on pole tags. Jidanni (talk) 21:06, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering
Talk:Lifeboat (rescue)

message: IMO there should be a clear split between the 44' and 47' MLBs since they are very different vessels. I have a good collection of materials on the 44' MLB (I was a MK on one and my dad oversaw all repairs to all 44' MLBs for Group Woods Hole for many years) including a certification check off booklet and basic operations manual (scans coming soon). Sigh, the 44's were slow but always brought you home. It's sad to see them almost gone.
In case anyone is wondering, the last two 44' MLBs in USCG service can been seen in Chatham, MA. I suspect they're not using the 47s because of their draft. There might also be a few near-complete ones left at the service yard in Maine since crews get assigned a different vessel when their's goes in for major service. 
Also, there are a few restored one's for sale out there but cost well over $100k USD (ouch).  Costoa 01:00, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split needed for 44' and 47' MLBs 

message: The 47 MLB is the most sophisticated MLB ever built
In the Whole World? Who has done the comparision?--84.129.194.84 (talk) 00:55, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Superlative

message: * The history prior to December 14, 2007 of this content can be found at lifeboat. Ravenna1961 (talk) 09:02, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cut-and-paste move

message: *Text-merge in from Motor life boat? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Text-merge in from Motor life boat?

message: I've come across a couple men who held such a certificate, plus a reference to a woman who achieved this status, in the first half of the 20th century. I found an actual duplicate certificate out of San Francisco dated 1942 which mentions a Bureau, but I don't know which one. My great uncle claimed to hold one as of 1927. The woman was mentioned in a book about lifeboats in the interwar years. This certificate isn't mentioned and probably should be, if anyone can determine more details. Pnoble805 (talk) 23:17, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Certificate of Efficiency to Lifeboat Man
Talk:List of Thracian tribes

message: Thracians tribe listing
Thracian tribes by Webber &
The Thracians 700 BC–AD 46
(Men-at-Arms 360) by Christopher the tharcians were very nice....
*Cebrenii
*Sucaeboae 
*Apsinthii
*Asti
*Bessi
*Bisaltae
*Bistoni
*Bithyni
*Brygi (<-Thracian or Phrygian?)
*Caeni
*Ciconi
*Dentheletai
*Dersae
*Dii
*Dolonci
*Edoni
*Getai
*Krobyzi
*Maidi
*Moesi
*Odrysai
*Sapae
*Satrae
*Serdi
*Skordiski (<-Illyro-Thraco-Celtic?)
*Thyni
*Thrausi
*Trallians
*Triballi
*Abantes
*Agathyrsi (<--Thraco-Scythian?) 
*Agrianians (<--Paionians)
*Apsinthii
*Asti
*Coreli
*Corplians
*Crestoni (<-Pelasgic/Lemnian?, see Herodotus etc.)
*Dardani (<-Illyro-Thraco-Paionian?)
*Laeaeans (<-Paionian)
*Maduateni
*Melanditae
*Moschi
*Mysi (<-Moesi; the Mysi of Anatolia were not Thracian)
*Nipsaeans
*Odomanti (<--or Paionian?)
*Paeonians (<--probably not Thracian, but a distinct language/origin)
*Paeti
*Sapae
*Satrae
*Scyrmiadae
*Serdi
*Sintians
*Tilataeans
*Tranipsae
*Treres  
Megistias (talk) 17:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thracians tribe listing 

message: I'm changing this entry from a List of Thracian tribes to more like an article about Thracian tribes, which will mention/list pretty much all tribes. Alex  (talk) 16:52, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved back. List pages have the title "List of X" – see Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Lists, etc.--William Allen Simpson (talk) 20:38, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved to Thracian tribes 

message: The aforementioned  (currently blocked for personal attacks) moved 
: to , 
and added redirects:
:
:
Is this correct or desirable?--William Allen Simpson (talk) 20:47, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved Bistoni to Bistones
Talk:Bob Green (footballer)

message: The article says "Date of Death Unknown", but do we know that he is in fact dead?  He could feasibly be 100 years old and still alive.  Timothy Horrigan (talk) 18:56, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: One source, the Carlton "Blueseum" web site, says he died four years after his career ended, in a streetcar accident. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 22:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death Unknown
Talk:2007 United Nations Climate Change Conference

message: The 15 articles on Wikinews covering the conference should all be considered valid sources for this article. Wikinews reporter Sean Heron attended the conference. --Brian McNeil /talk 09:47, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikinews coverage 

message: I've removed a section called "Criticism" which consisted of petty trivia about the estimated carbon output of the summit itself. This is extremely silly even as commentary and such editorializing shouldn't find its way--at least in this form--into any Wikipedia article. --TS 15:33, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia described as "Criticism"
Template talk:Vandal-m

message: Currently, the link to the block log (both normal and autoblock) is broken if the user name contains any punctuation (like an equal sign or parenthesis). To fix this, replace all instances of anchorencode: with urlencode:. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 10:08, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did that, but the template isn't protected, so you could have done it yourself. — Carl (CBM · talk) 14:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's cascading protected, I could not do it myself. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry, I missed that. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  anchorencode to urlencode 

message: This will align the suspected/confirmed socks and save space. See Template:Vandal-m/Sandbox. Simply replace the current template with everything between the <pre> tags. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 14:04, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't it look odd with the "ssp" struck like that? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 14:59, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, I thought I removed that part (used in testing). Anyway, i've updated things accordingly.Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 15:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . I tweaked it a little more. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:28, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tweak

message: Please add a link to the SPI for the user, in addition or instead of the the ancient SSP. Thanks. Someone not using his real name (talk) 21:29, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:TESTCASES, could you please sandbox this change? --Redrose64 (talk) 21:51, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. I was feeling nice, so I coded up the change for you. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 11:30, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: SPI

message: Change
to
It's expired: https://tools.wikimedia.de/~pgk/autoblock.php?blockee=Example vs https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=Example
Meteor sandwich yum (talk • contribs) 19:32, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 07:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 15 May 2014 

message: I've converted this template to use Module:Vandal-m. This is so that it can be used in Module:Protection banner without having to leave Lua. The test cases all check out, but please let me know if you spot any anomalies. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 11:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Converted to Lua
Category talk:Spanish Roman Catholics

message: Most Category:Spanish people would describe themselves as Category:Roman Catholics, so I would have thought this would be best restricted to those where their Catholicism is particularly notable, and not include those who happen to be notable and Roman Catholic at the same time. --Rumping (talk) 10:57, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not true  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.23.186.77 (talk) 11:09, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What is not true? The CIA says 94% of Spaniards are Roman Catholic --Rumping (talk) 21:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Real? That is why there is no true Scotsman --Rumping (talk) 15:05, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Dade battle

message: The incident in which Major Dade's command was all but wiped out by the Seminoles has historically been known as the "Dade Massacre". John K. Mahon, in History of the Second Seminole War, perhaps the most authoritative secondary source on that conflict, calls it "the massacre" (Revised Edition 1985, P. 106). -- Donald Albury 11:03, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

message: How many Indians participated? There is a discrepancy between the number in the text and the infobox. KnightLago (talk) 02:46, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Indians

message: The Trail of Tears page says the Seminole fought alongside blacks in this battle.  Can that be mentioned/ expanded on here? Ericaparrott (talk) 23:17, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Blacks
Talk:Vysoké Tatry (town)

message: The article features a picture of Strbske pleso. I may be wrong, but I think the court transfered Strbske pleso from the town of Vysoke Tatry to the village of Strba. Could anyone verify this information and change the picture accordingly? Tankred (talk) 01:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the problem. It is known that court by its decision from May 2007 transferred the settlement (i.e., not whole cadastral area) to Štrba from this town and the changes were already carried out by offices, if I'm not mistaken, however, town's website still lists Štrbské Pleso as it's part and I can find nothing about it on the Štrba's website, just a piece of information at its message board (Slovak). MarkBA what's up?/my mess 08:21, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. I would not rely much on www.vysoketatry.sk as they have been involved in this legal dispute. Personally, I would replace the picture by something that is certainly part of this town. Maybe Stary Smokovec or Tatranska Lomnica? Or perhaps a random picture of the High Tatras? But I am fine either way because the case seems to be quite complicated. I wonder what is your opinion. Tankred (talk) 19:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Strange is, that compared to the year 2005, the statistical office lists the town's area under 380km². For picture, as long it is within the town's area, it shouldn't make a problem. I don't know what to say, whether to leave it as part of Vysoké Tatry or change it to Štrba. The original article from Pravda is here. MarkBA what's up?/my mess 20:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Category talk:Suburbs of Melbourne

message: The Melway take on the official definition of a Melbourne suburb:
An identifiable entity as part of an urban area, that is comparable to existing suburbs, which has defined limits. This is taken to be a sub-unit of a metropolis.
I have had a look at this in relation to the 2005 Urban Growth Boundary (2030) here and here, which has revealed a simple situation delimiting the Melbourne metropolis and the Melton, Sunbury and Hastings enclaves.
All bounded localities within the UGB line now have some urban development and are clearly suburbs; no localities outside line and contiguous with localities inside the line have any urban development and are just as clearly not suburbs.
There are discrete urban areas within the Greater Melbourne area (the outer lines on the maps) beyond the metropolis but these are towns or townships, not suburbs (eg Warburton. Most of the bounded localities of the shires of Yarra Ranges, Cardinia and Melton are rural. 
A couple of grey areas: Doreen w/in Whittlesea Shire is urban; w/in Nillumbik Shire is rural, but this just requires a note in the suburb article. Wollert is partly w/in the line and has urban development and is thus a suburb, although the urban area will likely be renamed and what will then be left of Wollert will revert to a rural locality.
There exists a list of 292 Melbourne suburbs but this is apparently not official being a newspaper sub-editors' checklist and excludes the Sunbury, Melton, Hastings and the Mornington-Portsea suburbs.
If the definition I propose is accepted this will introduce precision into this category; a few entries will need to be removed, a couple added, a note added to the category page and a tweak to List of Melbourne suburbs to distinguish which are not, by our definition, suburbs. If we can reach agreement on this, consider the job done.
There is a 2010 proposal to extend the UGB here but this remains subject to discussion and is something for the future the should it eventuate; Rockbank would then become a suburb, whilst now it is paddocks full of rocks (Crusoe8181 (talk) 12:01, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition
Category talk:Suburbs of Redland City

message: This category needs to be changed to :Category:Suburbs of Redland City, Queensland from the defunct :Category:Suburbs of Redland Shire, Queensland. Maybe someone with AWB experience could fix this? I think most body text and templates have been updated but apparently not all categories. I'm not sure of the best way to do this considering recent local government area changes in Queensland were widespread. - Shiftchange (talk) 01:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Took me a while to see this post, but got around to doing it :) Orderinchaos 03:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Category updates
Category talk:Suburbs of Tweed Heads, New South Wales

message: A number of additions to this category appear to be places in Tweed Shire (the local government area) rather than suburbs of the urban area of Tweed Heads? The category name seems to suggest the latter, but what do people think should be happening? Kerry (talk) 06:44, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this suburbs of Tweed Heads or Tweed Shire?
Talk:HMS Panther (G41)

message: Does anybody knows the exact time on 9 october 1943 when Panther was attacked by Stukas und sunk ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.13.27.226 (talk) 12:39, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attack on HMS Panther on 9 october 1943 
Talk:CuneiForm (software)

message: Hmm, can someone check this
No mention of the open sourcing on the US version of the supposed firms
website (www.ocr.com), and there are a lot of 'cracking' groups in Russia..
62.56.120.128 (talk) 11:18, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, Can you get a press release from them? 62.56.77.93 (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  See official press release (translation via Promt or Babel Fish). You can download this great software here. --Yaleks (talk) 16:27, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

text:  You should try to set 200 DPI resolution to get normal results. Quality of recognition in that case can be compared to accuracy of FineReader 4 IMHO Temarez (talk) 21:31, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hmm, can someone check this

message: The link to the website simply leads to an "under construction" message. Is this service really up and running? If so, please what is the URL? SharkD (talk) 03:33, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Online recognition

message: *WatchOCR LiveCD  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.76.85.242 (talk) 23:33, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Used by

message: I removed this claim, which was marked for clarification:
:CuneiForm uses the OmniFont system.
I think this is referring to a general omnifont approach; it's later explained that Cuneiform combines this with the general multifont approach.  More detail would be helpful, but this statement seemed unnecessary and a bit confusing at the moment. -- Beland (talk) 16:00, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  OmniFont claim removed
Talk:Alvin Toles

message: Someone has repeatedly posted erroneous reports of the death of Alvin Toles, the subject of this article.  These reports have been UNSOURCED, since they only provide a link ( https://www.geni.com/people/Alvin-Torres/6000000012527218906 ) to a report of the death of a different person, with a different name (Alvin Torres, not Alvin Toles) and a different birth date (November 23, 1949, not March 23, 1963).  I say "someone" because these edits are being done by a constantly-changing IP address rather than a Wikipedia username.  Note, there have been NO reliable reports of the death of Alvin Toles in the media.  As noted in the Wikipedia rules, "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard." Nsxtasy (talk) 03:47, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Reports of His Death 

message: I hereby request that the edits to this page showing the death of Alvin Toles be removed, and perhaps the page should still be otherwise frozen for the time being.  As I just described in more detail in the Notes section of this article, he is NOT dead, and the edit reporting his death is UNSOURCED.  (It is accompanied by a link to a report of the death of an entirely different person, with a different name and birthdate.)  I have tried several times to undo these erroneous edits, but each time, they are re-applied by someone who uses a constantly-changing IP address instead of a Wikipedia username.  I tried leaving notes in the talk page for a username and an IP address making these erroneous edits but they still are getting made.
Nsxtasy (talk) 03:52, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 15:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 3 September 2016
Talk:Bertran d'Alamanon

message: I think it's fair to the reader to explain what manuscript A is, and perhaps where it is. --Wetman (talk) 11:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I plan to add something about the transmission of texts and manuscripts (perhaps incl. a table) at the troubadour article soon if you are interested. Srnec (talk) 05:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled