Talk:Criticisms of anti-scientific viewpoints

message: I agree with the many comments that were to the effect of moving this into scientism and deleting it. Since the page on scientism is clearly not neutral, and neither is this, either both should be removed, or they should be displayed together to show a balance of opinion on an issue. 82.153.19.100 20:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Criticisms of Anti-Scientific Viewpoints was moved from Scientism per the example set in Allopathy that was used to delete [criticisms of modern medicine]. When I developed an article on Allopathy, I wrongly pontificated on what is wrong with conventional medicine.  My tirade was correctly moved out of Allopathy into  [criticisms of modern medicine]. 
The identical situation exists here.
The original developers of the Scientism article pontificated on what is wrong with anti-scientific viewpoints.  So, following the above correct example, I moved this off-topic text into a separate article where it belongs.   Criticisms of Anti-Scientific Viewpoints has been listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion. Please see that page to vote, but please discuss the pros and cons on this talk page.
Criticisms of Anti-Scientific Viewpoints is nothing but a tirade on why some people are imagined to hold anti-scientific viewpoints. Long angry speeches, usually of a censorious or denunciatory nature, that is a diatribe, like this article have no place in an encyclopedia. -- Mr-Natural-Health 14:57, 9 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion are no longer being taken.

message: The article should likely merged into antiscience or the title should be changed to "Antiscientific views effect" because of criticism of personal feeling and faith rather than antiscience enterprise like pseudoscience. Also we say Criticism of religion since religion is organized sociocultural system designed for belief in deity or supernatural beings. When we say Criticism of antiscientific views, we criticize internal view/faith of individual and finally persuade to admit science (might be without evidence), regardless of skeptical thoughts. This resemble like religious conversion and thus said to be scientific privilege by pushing other faith boundary.    The Supermind (talk) 19:31, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing to Antiscientific views effect

message: * Criticisms of Anti-Scientific Viewpoints was moved from Scientism per the example set in Allopathy that was used to delete criticisms of modern medicine.  Criticisms of Anti-Scientific Viewpoints is nothing but a tirade on why some people  are imagined to hold anti-scientific viewpoints. Long angry speeches, usually of a censorious or denunciatory nature, that is a diatribe, like this article have no place in an encyclopedia. -- Mr-Natural-Health 18:43, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: From VfD

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Criticisms of socialism which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 08:45, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Criticisms of anti-scientific viewpoints. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121030144700/http://www.thehumanist.org/humanist/articles/dawkins.html to http://www.thehumanist.org/humanist/articles/dawkins.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:25, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified