lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dancing Mad (Final Fantasy VI)

message: Where do "Outergate Demon" and "Unearthly Standstill" come from? Thanos6 00:46, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not too familiar with the official English track titles myself, but judging from the context "Outergate Demon" refers to a monster.—ウルタプ 03:29, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but I mean, what's the source? Thanos6 03:30, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: …?  From the…game…?—ウルタプ 04:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I've never seen them there...Thanos6 05:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piece names? 

message: Should a point be added that an organ section of Dancing Mad was used in Final Fantasy VIII as the music for Ultimecia's Castle?  It's pretty much the same piece. Antisora 12:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they're just both organ...—ウルタプ 14:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are not "just both organ", FFVIII uses an looping excerpt of Dancing Mad.  It is the same piece.Antisora 12:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean at the start of the music that plays in Ultimecia's castle (that's all I can think of that you might mean). Because it is similar, but not the same. Arrowny 23:27, 09 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in Final Fantasy VIII 

message: Listening to the tracks, I can't hear any part of the third movement that is similar to the Esper World music (assuming it's 'Another World of Beasts'). Perhaps someone with a better musical ear than I could check this? (And also put me at rest by telling which part it is. I have piano music for Dancing Mad but not Another World of Beasts, so I can't check that way, sigh) 194.247.225.98 20:14, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Movement Leitmofits
Talk:Royal Hospital Chelsea

message: Something should probably be added about this, since it's rather new, and quite important. 
Also the rebuilding of the infirmary. --J.StuartClarke 05:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Admittence of women

message: Any chance of getting a list of other officers of Chelsea Hopsital.  Early ones include Robert Walpole and Kingsmill Eyre (secretary).  This seems to have eben a source of political patronage, though it was not strictly a sinecure.  Peterkingiron (talk) 23:43, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other officers 

message: I suggest this article is merged with Chelsea Pensioner as there is considerable overlap. Ben Finn (talk) 13:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Royal Hospital Chelsea is only for British Army veterans.  Are there RN and RAF equivalents?  216.255.165.198 (talk) 00:46, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other services 

message: There seems to presently be a problem accessing it - even going via a websearch. Jackiespeel (talk) 19:52, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hospital website
Talk:St Dunstan-in-the-East

message: Don't want to make a proper edit, because I've had trouble in the past, but the all hallows house foundation doesn't exist anymore: https://beta.charitycommission.gov.uk/charity-details/?regid=1003809&subid=0  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.187.178.111 (talk) 20:21, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Wren Building

message: William & Mary (doubtless over the objections of its history department, which cares about accuracy) likes to claim (1) that "The Wren Building is the oldest continually used academic building in the U.S." and (2) "According to tradition, the building was designed by famous British architect Christopher Wren" (both statements removed from this page).  Neither statement is true.  
(1) The Wren was not used during the early 1880s, when W&M closed its doors and ceased to exist as a private college, and it was not used during the Civil War, when (as this article notes) it was used by the CSA.  Buildings at other colleges, notably Harvard, continued in use during those periods.  Therefore the Wren is not the oldest continually used academic building.  
(2) Although it might be technically true that legend attributes the building to Wren, no serious scholar does so, and placing the legend at the top of the article gives it far too much prominence, implying that it has some basis in fact.  It does not, and no one who has studied the history of the building (which was not even named for Wren until the 1920s) believes that it does.  A single unreliable writer in the eighteenth century once said that the inspiration for the precursor to the Wren (which burned well before his time) was "modelled by" Wren; that was not the building now standing or even the inspiration for the building now standing, i.e. the one built around 1705.
--Shuffl 21:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please cite "oldest in continuous use" claim, etc.
Talk:Tom Tower

message: Very inspiring building it feels like you are in the presence of God. Awaiting a reply that is very m OK moving.
In the Presence of God!!!
Sincerely,
Mr. Leon IUI des Roda-Molinar
Founder/Owner
Leonidesarts Gallery New York
 Latinorican (talk) 21:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chapel 

message: Besides lacking a citation as already noted, the reference to the date of composition of "Great Tom is Cast" lacks context as the writer does not provide dates of Matthew White's life. Billfalls (talk) 14:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matthew White
Talk:Hydrogen–deuterium exchange

message: According to the internal wiki link provided,  "A chemical reaction is a process that leads to the transformation of one set of chemical substances to [sic] another."  By this definition, hydrogen-deuterium exchange is not a chemical reaction, since isotopic exchange does not alter the chemical structure of a substance.  Tachyon 22:07, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "chemical reaction" 

message: The physical exchange of protons and deuterium nuclei was known well before its application to proteins.  For example, see Halford et al., 1934    Tachyon 22:33, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Precedence
Talk:Arthur Tansley

message: While I don't have any reason to doubt this, I don't know how to source it. I'm moving it here. Guettarda (talk) 15:47, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced 

message: Good day sir ,may i ask a question? regarding in quadrat measurement, in quadrat measurements there is a 4 station because it is a square form , my question is why taking a sample in the midle of quadrat is not  possible? What is the reason sir? 2001:4455:6B8:EE00:E026:B992:2C18:98CF (talk) 10:14, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment of water quality using macrobenthos as a bio indicator in bird sanctuary
Talk:Arizona Biltmore Hotel

message: Cartier is no longer at the Biltmore Fashion Park.  It moved to Scottsdale Fashion Square a while ago.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.17.123.218 (talk) 04:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I noticed that the presidential election section still appears on this page. It doesn't really belong here anymore, we still have a record of John McCain staying at the hotel under "Celebrities". I suggest adding a blurb about John McCain watching the election and finally conceding at the Arizona Biltmore, and a reference to go along with this new information, and then removing the Presedential Election section. Let me know if you agree, otherwise I'll do this in 2 weeks. Mononomic (talk) 04:43, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like someone else has done something similar and it's agreeable to me. Thanks, Elendil's Heir! Mononomic (talk) 22:16, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Presidential Election Section?
Talk:Candidatus Pelagibacter communis

message: This article references a BBC news website article by Roland Pease. However, many of the words are copied verbatim from the BBC article. At work, if I read this as part of a students work, I would call them in to discuss plagiarism: are there copyright issues using text taken from BBC web pages? Celticbattlepants 15:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just deleted the affected section (subsequent editors had altered it a bit, but it was still recognizable). For anyone in a similar situation in the future, please delete the plagiarized text immediately (or follow the procedures at WP:CP if it's the whole article) rather than mentioning it on a talk page where no one will see it for a year. DopefishJustin 02:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

message: 'Its discovery was the subject of "Oceans of Microbes", Episode 5 of "Intimate Strangers: Unseen Life on Earth" by PBS'  - I'm not sure why we should care about that, it certainly isn't a characteristic of P. ubique.
HairyDan (talk) 18:40, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable relevance
Talk:Unity Temple

message: *Unity Temple is not open to the public without paying for admission. The building is currently a museum.Wrightwriter (talk) 06:07, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a few years late for this comment to matter, but the building has never been a museum. It's always been in use by an active congregation. Highnumber (talk) 15:21, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Unity Temple houses a church that meets on Sundays - and they also use the space at other points during the week; however, there are times during the weekdays that tours are given to the general public, and those are PAID tours where admission is charged, with the money going to the building's continued upkeep. The tours are given as a point of architectural interest, though - Unity Temple is not in any way a "museum." 104.153.231.177 (talk) 23:56, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Correct, it is not a museum. The part of the article that describes the restoration talks about the Foundation that now partly owns the building (along with the congregation) and the tours are managed and run by the Foundation, with fees helping to sustain upkeep of the building (which is still fundraising for the capital campaign for the restoration as well). 2603:8001:2A00:7428:64B6:AC7C:BD83:4A8C (talk) 04:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: These photos all appear to be taken some years ago - there are newer photos as the building has been restored. 2603:8001:2A00:7428:64B6:AC7C:BD83:4A8C (talk) 04:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 
Talk:Perisur

message: I moved this from the main article:
* The "Cinema Park" 4D Cinema theater, the first in the American Continent.
I've always thought that the fourth dimension is time, after length, width, and depth.  If someone can confirm that this theater does in fact travel through time, please cite appropriate sources.  If, on the other hand, "4D" is just a title, then there should be more than one in North America.  -Oatmeal batman 15:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously, is not actually time travelling. You're travelling in time always. But time goes as fast as 1hr/hr... The official title is "Cinema Park" and is contained inside Cinépolis (4 or 5 theaters were used for). The real concept is that shows nature, music, etc with an unique style, containing music, movement and being actually part of the action (that's why the 4D reference is for). I asked to Perisur and Cinépolis management about being the first in Latin America but they ansewered it was the first in the continent. (I guess it was invented in Japan). Maybe they were wrong and there's another in the States or somewhere--Fluence 00:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 4D?
Talk:Sophia Grojsman

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 04:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Beth Sholom Congregation (Elkins Park, Pennsylvania)

message: I moved this here:
::", one of the few architects to work in the Mayan Revival architecture style:
because there is nothing Mayan about this building and the Mayan Revival architecture was a style that ended a dozen years before this building was designed and FLW was not one to design is passe styles.  Feel free to discuss this.  Here.  Carptrash (talk) 18:15, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mayan style
Talk:Hollyhock House

message: In short, no.  See my comments at  Talk:Barnsdall Art Park#Merging Holyhock house with Barnsdall Art Park dm (talk) 19:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, it's notable in its own right. Mfield (talk) 15:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a week with no additional comments, so I'm removing this...  dm (talk) 18:28, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Holyhock house with Barnsdall Art Park 

message: The history section contradicts itself, saying both that the house is currently open and closed. Fixing properly would require knowing when the open period including the 2005 date mentioned, actually began. I don't, so I'm leaving it to someone who does. HuwG 203.208.123.81 (talk) 07:44, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currently open or closed 
Talk:James Charnley House

message: I found the following source(s) via JSTOR (unless otherwise noted), I will add some info if I get a chance.
*Morgan, Keith. "The Charnley-Persky House: Architectural History and the Society (in Editorial)," The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 54, No. 3. (Sep., 1995), pp. 276-277. 
IvoShandor 14:21, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good sources
Talk:David Hunter

message: A note on Hunter's reports in the Official Records.  Hunter's knowledge of the Upper Valley was imperfect and his reports continue to sow confusion as a result.  In his report on the Battle of Piedmont, Hunter  mistakenly states that he crossed the Shenandoah, when in fact he crossed the North River, a couple hundred yards upstream from where the confluence of the North and South Rivers forms the South Fork Shenandoah.  The problem is exacerbated in modern times because Google Maps currently makes a similar mistake.  
Hunter further errs when he states in the same reports when that all of Governor Letcher's properties in Lexington were burned.  While the Governor's home was burned, the house next door, which belonged to his father, was spared because the Governor's mother stared down the Union soldiers from the front porch.  The Governor retired to that home, spent the rest of his life there, and turned the property over to Washinton and Lee University, where it currently serves as the International Education offices (21 University Place).  It is still known as "The Letcher House."  (See, e.g., Official Records of the War of the Rebellion, Series I, Vol. 37, Part I, p. 97.) Minor quibbles, to be sure, but critical to understanding certain aspects of Hunter's Raid. Sofa King (talk) 22:15, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article talks about General Order No. 11, but the historical marker says #7.  Is this confused with General Order No. 11 (1862)?  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:22, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Order 7 or 11?
Talk:Frank Lloyd Wright Home and Studio

message: The photo of the pergola at the Chicago Street entrance shows a portion of the structure that has been demolished in the recent restoration.  It was an part of an addition made to the studio entry after Wright had abandoned his Oak Park practice and had converted the studio/office into a residential rental.
A post-restoration photo would be more appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.215.139.62 (talk • contribs)  
*Hey hey! I will be in Oak Park in the next couple of weeks to do just that. : )IvoShandor 13:01, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo
Talk:Pope–Leighey House

message: Mrs. Leighey functioned as tour guide and interpreter of the house and would remark that many visitors did not realize it was still her residence. She recalled an architecture student who looked into the bathroom and exclaimed "There's soap in the soap dish!!". Saxophobia (talk) 17:46, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: FYI: the NRHP may list the nearest community as Alexandria, Virginia, but the house is actually located in Fairfax County.  I've updated the categories to note as much. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Alexandria, Virginia
Talk:Imperial Hotel, Tokyo

message: This article covers the historic Frank Lloyd Wright structure built in the 1920's.  This hotel was removed decades ago for display as a museum.  It is unrelated to the Imperial Hotel chain currently in operation, or any of it's facilities.  That chain has it's own article.  I am removing all references to the modern chain.  --Bridgecross (talk) 16:21, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is not about the modern hotel chain 

message: Which has had three major incarnations involving at least 10 separate structures (two of which were designed by Frank Lloyd wright). I have tried to sort out the chronology as best I can. We could, of course, separate it into three articles—one for each major incarnation—but I don't think there is enough material to do this yet. I have not yet been able to find out when the annex to the first Imperial was built, but we know it burnt down in late 1919 (a real date here would be nice too) to be replaced by an Wright-designed annex, which was destroyed in the 1923 earthquake. I have also added citations and gotten rid of the "unscathed by WW2" (untrue). More to come eventually. Don Lammers (talk) 00:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is about the Imperial Hotel in Tokyo

message: I realize this smacks of original research, and someone will spot the following at some point, so I will go ahead and explain. I only found dates for groundbreaking of the current main building in two places, and they don't agree. The "first 100 Years" book by the hotel says February 28, 1969. However, that would mean they built and furnished a 17-story, three basement level luxury hotel in 11 months (opening was March 10, 1970). In addition, on the facing page is as photo labeled "Early stages of construction in 1968", and it shows a reasonable amount of work up to ground level complete. Again, it seems unlikely that the "groundbreaking" would be done after the main holes are dug and foundations evidently poured. So I went searching and found the article in the Gettysburg Times (Really? Gettysburg is the only place that noticed this?) that puts it on February 28, 1968. This also aligns better with the Meiji-mura report reproduced in the "First 100 years" book that claims all demolition was completed and materials stored by some time in March. I am assuming that the date in the "First 100 years" is a typo. Don Lammers (talk) 21:45, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Groundbreaking for 1970 Hotel
Talk:Allies and Morrison

message: Back on 2 Oct 2013 User:Alliesandmorrison added lots of information which as far as I can tell was copied and pasted from the Allies and Morrison website. The additions were reverted and the user blocked as having a name clearly linked to the organisation. Then edits from an IP address occured over the next few weeks which merely put back the removed content. One user removed it twice, before it came back and I can see is still there. It's basically a list of partners, list of buildings and details of their departments, most of it copied from the website. Wikipedia doesn't need to contain all of their work, just anything that might be notable. I'm going to remove all that content again. Seaweed (talk) 13:40, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repeated copy paste problems
Talk:RTKL Associates

message: 1) Tell me why this advert should not be removed
2) Cease and desist adding your employees names to the list of engineers. There may be some justification for some of them, but your EITs and Data center dave are not notable.
Greglocock 10:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm shocked that this article has been left, unreferenced and, quite likely, written by members of RTKL communications team! IP 38.112.73.205 added unsourced info in 2009 while openly admitting to be part of RTKL's communications team. Shirmsy slyly removed the 'unreferenced' tag in March 2011 and, again, added considerable amounts of unsourced data. Global firms shouldn't be using Wikipedia as free advertising, WP is for encyclopaedic (reliably and independently sourced) appraisals. I've added back the 'unreferenced' tag and also added a 'conflict of interest' tag, until the article can be re-edited to provide a balanced, verifiable article. Sionk (talk) 16:33, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Another great piece of advertising by a global company
Talk:Carrère and Hastings

message: Section included duplicate entries for Paterson City Hall, with different dates (1894 and 1896). Removed entry cited 1894 date of Carrère and Hastings design while remaining entry cites date of construction (i.e. 1896). The latter has been retained and properly cited.RyeCityRoller (talk) 16:44, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selected works
Talk:Matrimonial website

message: There are several free matrimonial sites available in India but none is popular due to lack of privacy. Most of the profiles are bogus and users are not generally login frequently. Some websites like www.midhuna.com with features like commercial sites are serving for some regions only. jainadarsh.com is a totally free site, launched as a social service project of Vyasan Mukta Pariwar, Hyderabad. It does not restrict itself to the Jain community alone but has introduced the concept of 'Jains by habits'. Thus people who are not Jains by religion or birth but by habits find a place and people who may be jains by birth but not by habits are kept away. In addition the website has a page to explain the essence of Jainism, not as a religion but as a essential way of life.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.135.81 (talk) 08:44, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The references section seems to be hidden from editing view? I added some information from an Economist article, added the article to references, but it's formatted in a different way than the other references. Since I can't see them, I'm not sure how to proceed with editing them.
gloria 20:45, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: request to add shaadiya.com - it is a marriage website -that's the biggest reason to add
 Why it mentions only Ukraine? There's a Russian matchmaking site www.be2.ru!
:The point of the page isn't to list specific service providers - it's to cover the concept of marriage websites.  Specific service providers generally make for inappropriate external links an are rarely reliable sources for encyclopedic assertions.  -- SiobhanHansa 14:35, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We aren't mentioning any specific sites - at least, not intentionally.  Sometimes they slip in for a while but I take them out when I see them.  If you spot one please point it out.  -- SiobhanHansa 01:52, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding link 

message: Proposing to add a new section on Online Matrimony that adds value and gives other perspectives in terms of business potential, user acceptance, and possible threats or misuse of these matchmaking websites. Comments and suggestions are welcome.
Wisewhip (talk) 12:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Section on Online Matrimony 
Talk:The Architects Collaborative

message: I removed the apostrophe from the title, because it seems that the majority of reliable sources do not have an apostrophe when referring the The Architects Collaborative. Please see below for a few links that show their publication (which does not have an apostrophe), as well as a few articles that also do not have the apostrophe.
*https://archnet.org/authorities/196
*https://www.architects.org/architectureboston/articles/cambridge-school
*https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Architects_Collaborative.html?id=7elPAAAAMAAJ
*https://www.moma.org/artists/63815 Slothwade (talk) 17:48, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: James F. (talk) 17:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 