lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lists of national parks

message: Category:National parks, which I did not create but have added to.  I'm putting this article in that category.  I suggest filling the category with the articles in these lists.  I'll start, but can't do the whole thing! Gwimpey 17:25, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:National Parks 

message: Removed all the links from the headings as per Manual of Style. If you need to link to a list of national parks in a specific region, do so in a see also, as has been done in africa. skorpion 10:38, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of links

message: A discussion has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries/Lists of countries which could affect the inclusion criteria and title of this and other lists of countries.  Editors are invited to participate. Pfainuk talk 13:37, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Discussion

message: PDF output using Google Chrome's built-in distiller produces poor results with this page. (Use the Ctrl P command in Chrome to preview). Issue may be with the template used or (more likely) the the way content was entered (coded) into the template and saved by the contributor. For example, when printing this article with Google's PDF printer, the first page has too much white (wasted) space; overlap of a table and image occurs on another page. Note that the font size should not dynamically scale up or down to fit a page; font size of the main-body text content should be about 12 points on outputted PDF page(s); it is the images and table cells that should dynamically scale up or down to fit the info box and template in order to maintain the two-column Wikipedia layout. The offending elements appear to be the tables. Refer to this Wikipedia article for a proper printer-friendly layout using tables with images -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_German_Navy_ships  Printchecker (talk) 16:24, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template produces poor PDF (print) output 
Talk:Trophic dynamics

message: The presentation on this page looks overly academicized. It lacks a description of energy tranfer efficiency between trophic levels and contains a lot of material on production levels in different biomes that really is irrelevant to the concept of energy metabolims in the environment. Really needs an ecologist to along and fix it up.
A Primack
3 trophic levels is the usual case, but 4 and 5 are found as well; 6 levels exist but is really exceptional. Anthère
:Including information on the maximum number of levels found would be good - I believe 6 is basically the limit, but I haven't got any source for this right now. Richard001 07:25, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good idea. The topic is well covered on the environmental vegetarianism page, but it would be good to mention it and link to it here, or perhaps on the trophic pyramid, which discusses the efficiency of transfer between trophic levels. This is probably not the place to discuss the health benefits of vegetarianism, but definitely the efficiency argument. I am considering revising this page (primarily by shortening it and improving the links), and will include your idea if I get around to it. Cheers Justinleif 20:12, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: picture of list of pruducers  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.49.230 (talk) 22:20, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  producers 

message: I am surprised that this article does not even mention competition anywhere. While consumption should be the focus in trophic levels, shouldn't competition be at least mentioned somewhere. MATThematical (talk) 21:17, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Competition

message: Trophic dynamics should not have a main article - but should be nested as a sub-heading within food web. It was a title on a paper in 1942 by Lindeman -  - who discussed food cycles (which is synonymous with food web). I'm working on food web and finding it difficult to think of ways to organize the links here. Trophic level deserves a main article page - but trophic dynamics is pretty much synonymous with food web.Thompsma (talk) 21:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested move

message: I have requested a speedy deletion. Please see discussion in food chain. This is actually a merger between trophic dynamics, food web, food chain into food web.Thompsma (talk) 00:06, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion
Talk:Albanian cuisine

message: What is this sentence trying to communicate? 
It is believed that because of this diet Albania has a very high life expectancy when its economic power is compared to other countries, characterized by some researchers as the "Albanian paradox".
What does its high life expectancy have to do with its economic power, and why is that worthy of comparison to other countries? It seems like it needs a rewrite. 174.4.18.174 (talk) 19:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Health Effects
Talk:Harvey Milk

message: LGBT is modern political ideology / concept. It can't be said with any exactitude that he would have suppported LGBT positions. Surely it would be more accurate to refer to him as being not only gay or homosexual, but as a supporter of gay, homosexual, lesbian and same sex attracted rights? 2400:2410:9520:4C00:51C5:A7A0:4FF8:E941 (talk) 13:39, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Since multiple reliable sources retroactively refer to him as a member of the LGBT community, it's ok for us to do the same. (It would be different if multiple RS noted substantial controversy over that classification.) Xan747 ✈️ 🧑‍✈️ 21:17, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the use of LGBT anachronistic? 

message: As of today, this article is clear, very readable, and seems to be complete. Good job and thank you. Wordreader (talk) 17:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks to the editors.
Talk:Ibogaine/Archive 1

message: is ibogaine a tryptamine?  i always thought they were in there own indole class, "iboganes".  i dont think that they are tryptamines, as they don't have "tryptamine" in the chemical name . . .    --Heah 22:55, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, ibogaine is a tryptamine.
"Chemically, ibogaine is classified as a tryptamine, being a rigid analog of melatonin, and is structurally similar to harmaline, another natural alkaloid and psychedelic (Xu et al, 2000)."
from:
Freedlander, J. M. (2003). Ibogaine: a novel anti-addictive compound – a comprehensive 
literature review (revised). Journal of Drug Education and Awareness, 1, 79–98.
http://userpages.umbc.edu/~jfreed1/Ibogaine.html
--j0n 11:24, 16 Dec 2005 (UTC)

text: hi jon! literature usually classifies ibogaine as tryptamine. however, strictly speaking, that may be incorrect. in tryptamines the R alpha group may not just bind back to the 2nd nitrogen ring, as ibogain does (as User:Zinnmann told me, if i understood him correctly).--ekki 20:39, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It is falsely classified as a tryptamine! Correct classifications are: indole alkaloid, iboga alkaloid and indolo[2,3-d]azepine. It is also far from being a (tetrahydro)betacarboline. Melatonin is a tryptamide. Tryptamines possess an open (non-cyclized) side chain, at least this chain is not rebound at the indole nucleus.--Wg0867 17:25, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  tryptamine??
Talk:The Dot and the Line

message: I am looking for this film as well. 
Any ideas?
macdvorak@alltel.net
:It's available as a bonus on "The Glass Bottom Boat" DVD, but this really isn't a suitable forum for questions like this.  A google search turned up a discussion on the Big Cartoon Forum covering this topic.  Kanenas, Bastille day, 2005
It is available on youtube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmSbdvzbOzY  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Itwilltakeoff (talk • contribs) 10:37, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  film short
Talk:American Bible Society

message: 'In the past, I have donated to the American Bible Society (ABS). My donation in no way reflects any bias for or against the ABS or it's activities.iHoshie 11:37, 1 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Declaration of Interest

message: There are reports that a high percentage of the Society's staff members are Catholic, perhaps up to 50 or 60 percent. This is somewhat controversial, since Bible societies were previously condemned by the Roman Catholic Church. It would be interesting if we could verify this and include it within the article's contents.  ADM (talk) 07:49, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholic staff members

message: There is an inconsistency in the dates of the following paragraph :
----------------------------
In January 2019, American Bible Society introduced the Affirmation of Biblical Community, an employee policy which requires staff to align around a core set of Christian beliefs and practices.[19] The organization came under criticism as the policy excludes individuals in homosexual or unwed heterosexual relationships from employment at the organization. [20] While the organization lost 20 percent of its workforce in 2018, according to American Bible Society, only 4 percent of the organization's staff left in response to the Affirmation. Leadership of the organization explained that the 20 percent attrition in 2018 was consistent with annual totals prior to the new Affirmation policy.[21]
----------------------------
It says that the Affirmation policy was introduced in January 2019, but then says that the organization lost 20 percent of its workforce in 2018 [because of the Affirmation policy].
It looks as though the year 2019 at the beginning of the paragraph should be 2018 because the organization could not have lost 20 percent of its staff in 2018, as it says in the third sentence, if the policy was introduced the next year, 2019, as it says in the first sentence.
76.170.153.18 (talk) 22:53, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect year in article.
Talk:Contemporary English Version

message: In the past, I have donated to the American Bible Society (ABS). My donation in no way reflects any bias for or against the ABS or it's activities.
iHoshie 11:38, 1 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Declaration of Interest

message: I tried to research this line, and while I found that the British and Foreign Bible Society did win an award from the Plain English Society, their site does not specifically mention the CEV, so I removed the line. If someone can find some clarification on this issue--an article mentioning the CEV, for example--then it should be added back in, though. 24.247.162.139 (talk) 03:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plain English Society Crystal Award 
Talk:Algebraic quantum field theory

message: Is the functor \mathcal{A} covariant, or contravariant (as it would be in the case of a sheaf)? It perhaps looks like the former, from what is said (restriction maps are rarely going to be injective). But I think we should be told.
Charles Matthews 12:56, 1 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree completely. Let's hope there'll be more progress towards this in the next 18 months ! _R_ 19:17, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is completely the wrong tag (technical tag) for asking for improvements on content (which would probably make the article more technical anyway).  I removed it.  --C S (talk) 07:32, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

message: The list of researches at the end along with links to their websites seems promotional to me. So I plan to cut down the list to those researchers who are notable as evidenced by an article on them at WP. --Mark viking (talk) 20:58, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: List of researchers

message: The page is written in the language of category theory.  I suggest that many people who would be interested in the Haag-Kastler axioms don't speak that language.
FWIW, Haag and Kastler did not present their axioms in the language of category theory.
Gregweeks (talk) 01:43, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The description is only for category theorists. 

message: Somebody more expert in AQFT than I should explain what "the net" and "net monomorphism" refer to.  My general sense is that an AQFT defines an allowed set of states on a "net of algebras" but it should pointed out just what that net is before the term is used.  There is a monomorphism referred to earlier, maybe that's the net monomorphism, but then this should be stated.  Hope someone can do this!
MorphismOfDoom (talk) 18:51, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Net and net monomorphism need to be defined  

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
----
:Local quantum field theory →  – New name is much more widely used in the scientific literature and thus more appropriate STEMster42 (talk) 10:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 20 December 2022
Talk:Purple frog

message: Definitely on the ball! Wetman 13:27, 1 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can the map show a more restricted region ? Shyamal 03:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Shyamal 07:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: I think the introduction is out-of-date.  There it claims that the frog forms its own family, but later on it is claimed that this was changed.  Either the intro or the later bit needs to change. LWizard @ 20:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed i hope. Shyamal 04:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: In a news report, Purple frog among 24 new species found in Suriname, dated 4 June, 2007, a purple fluorescent frog has been discovered. I don't know if there is any taxonomy available for this species yet. Perhaps some mention should go into the current article nevertheless? __meco 22:26, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does not look like a Sooglossidae or close relative. Except for the colour similarity, probably not relevant. Shyamal 03:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the one from Suriname is actually a Bufonid (Adelotus), so there is no relation whatsoever. --liquidGhoul 05:22, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another purple frog from Suriname 

message: Not sure what info is in here, but may be helpful  Range distribution for sure. pschemp | talk 03:09, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I updated the map. Unfortunately there was still a coordinate in the journal which had the longitude marked with minutes of 64 ! Found yet another ref here and User:Kalyanvarma has offered some nice pictures from here. Shyamal 16:05, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to scholarly article

message: i have skimmed over this entire thing but there appears to be no explanation of their diet, how does a creature with such a small mouth eat, and how?@ 204.145.232.66 (talk) 20:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  what do they eat and how?
Talk:Brylcreem

message: It's refered to in the past--Sicamous 19:22, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Addendum: re Flintstone citation. Agreed. Plenty of websites repeat the claim, but I can't find any objective evidence for it. Furthest back I can track it is to an unsubstantiated statement in  this article. Trussst no-one.RayGirvan 11:43, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: I'm thinking of adding a photo of a tube of Brylcreem.  Would this be a problem or would fair use be in play? Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 19:19, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I went ahead and added one. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 17:24, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

text: And it is gone.  Any reason why adding a pic of the ubiquitous tube is an issue? --Surv1v4l1st ╠Talk║Contribs╣ 21:03, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding photo? 

message: I recall a TV campaign (1968) to win men away from the Hippie, long-dry-tresses look, to deprecate the unfashionable 'greasy kid-stuff' taunt, and persuade boys to once again use Brylcreem. The slogan was 'I came back' and there were various brief 'testimonials' from rather square-looking guys of the short-back-and-sides he-man type, saying one after the other 'I came back'. This sequence ended with a pretty young woman of the non-Hippie variety, the full skirt and Hush-Puppies type of clean-living lass, running her fingers through the last fellow's hair and saying 'And I'm GLAD he did.'  Message: smear on our shiny gunk and the girls will flock.
There is a link to it here
 Bluedawe 02:04, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Came Back 

message: I use brylcreem daily. In the past year it had out of stock for weeks on end. On my most recent pot, there was a little piece of tape. When i removed it, i found the words made in Indonesia underneath. So I'm guessing they relocated their factory again. Previously it had been moved from England to Indonesia.  No official news about it though.  PizzaMan (talk) 09:06, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indonesia 
Talk:BBC UKTV

message: Should this be UKTV or UK.TV. I added a link to the BBC page some time ago as UKTV (Australia). Mintguy 13:45, 1 Dec 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe so, they refer to it as UKTV on their website.   I would suggest renaming to UKTV (Australia and New Zealand). --DeadlyAssassin (talk) 06:53, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the following really true?
In Australia, UK.TV is required by law to broadcast a quota of local content, so in addition to British programming, it has repeated Australian soap operas Sons and Daughters and Prisoner
Reason I ask is that I can't think of any Australian shows on UK-TV these days. And certainly on free-to-air repeats do not count towards the required quota of local programming, so why would repeats count for Foxtel if they had the same requirement. Those show were def. on UKTV but maybe not for the reason claimed by this article. Asa01 19:47, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's almost true. UKTV doesn't have to screen a quota of Oz programs, but it does have to *fund* them. They partially funded "Changi" for instance. These programs they put money into, of course, will probably screen on the channel. (http://www.acma.gov.au/ACMAINTER.65640:STANDARD:991144607:pc=PC_91809) matturn 11:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Australian UK.TV website also contains this info. ant_ie 18:29, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Query
Talk:Handley Page

message: For the record, extensive checking shows that both Sir Frederick and the aircraft company spell their names without hyphens. A few of the references that back this up:
*http://www.handleypage.com/History_page.html
*Royal Aeronautical Society
*Britannica
DJ Clayworth 15:48, 1 Dec 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is an aircraft missing from this section. Called the "Hereford", it was a re-design of the Hampden. I think it differed from the Hampden by the engines fitted. It wasn't a success for some reason.
Taff Hewitt (talk) 11:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The Hereford is already included in the products section.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested amendment for the "Products" section 

message: no idea what an antiseptic aircraft is Thomas.Osman (talk) 21:23, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no clue either. It was added by User:NiD.29, so hopefully he can explain it. BilCat (talk) 22:45, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The Type D article mentions it as just a nickname given by the test pilot, no mention in the Type E article. MilborneOne (talk) 10:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  According to C H Barnes's Handley Page since 1907, both the Type D and Type E had the nickname "Yellow Peril" while the Type D was known as the "Antiseptic" - both of which appear to have been inspired by the yellow varnishing of the wings and tail.Nigel Ish (talk) 17:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  two aircraft types are called 'antiseptic'
Talk:Essentialism

message: The paragraph here is grossly simplistic and in my view false. The medieval naturalists were not slavish followers of Aristotle - Frederick II in fact criticises Aristotle on natural history (which had only just been translated by Michael Scot), and none of the literature refers to the causal or generative essences of biological species at any time from the classical period until after Darwin. The myth appears to have arisen some time around the centenary of the Origin, in 1959, based on a passing comment in H. W. Joseph's Introduction to Logic in 1916.
There was, and still is, a taxonomic essentialism, in which the defining characters of a species or higher taxon are listed in describing it, but that is not the sort of essentialism attacked in the essentialism story. Types were always "more or less", and what was held to be essential to a species was the ability of the organisms to generate more like them. Morphology was only ever used for identification. I would go so far as to say that biological essentialism doesn't arise until, at the earliest, the 1890s, and probably, due to the ambiguity of the so-called essentialists' writings, not until the mid-1930s (Agnes Arber and H. R. Thompson). In short, it is based on a historical misreading.
Moreover, Aristotle was not a fixist. He accepted new species through hybridisation. Fixism arose in the mid-17th century with John Ray, and it was always based on pitey and doctrine rather than any philosophical foundation.
Later note:
I now think there never was any kind of constitutive essentialism in biology (it was always a matter of identification or diagnosis). I argue this in my book, coming out this year. Obviously as thi sis my own research I can't put it on this page, but when it is out, someone else might like to address it.
The book is Species: A history of the idea from University of California Press 2009.
John Wilkins (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:25, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biological essentialism 

message: I'm puzzled by this section.  As far as I'm aware, the term "essentialism" is not used in mathematics or in the philosophy of math -- at least there's no reference to it in the philosophy of mathematics article.  There is only one reference in the section (to an article by Folland), and Folland doesn't use the word.  Can anyone clarify whether or not this section really belongs?  Thanks.--NightHeron (talk) 23:47, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section "In Mathematics" 

message: Just FYI I cut the hatnote on book Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less because it's a redirect to the author page Greg_McKeown_(author). In this 2015 AfD it was decided that the book is not notable in and of itself: , and WP:HAT states that  in hatnotes. If anyone disagrees with this edit, I'll be happy to discuss. Generalrelative (talk) 04:29, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why I cut the hatnote on the book [[Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less]]
Wikipedia talk:Historical archive/Refreshing brilliant prose - History and religion

message: *History of England
**Keep but some resolution required: the first section is called Pre-Roman England , which is a bit odd as there is no specifically Pre-Roman English culture or entity. The next section gets it right: Roman Britain. The intro recognises that there is no England before the 10th century, but I stll feel that the conflicts I've touched on need to be addressed regardless of brilliant prose status. Maybe on the lines of History of Scotland? Bmills
*Norse mythology (category)
**Keep (but it needs headings/a table of contents/some editing for structure) Bmills
One would get the impression (wrongly, hopefully) that some people are simply adding their names to the 'remove' vote alongside everything without actually checking the articles. Either that or every single article is flawed, and the odds against that in all cases make that rather unlikely. FearÉIREANN 00:30, 4 Jan 2004 (UTC)