lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bailment

message: Under Bailment what if the posing bailor is not the owner, do they have the authority to pass on bailment or would this be a case on involuntary bailment.
Where the author claims that the parking garage relationship is not one of bailment, the claim is overbroad. If the parking garage is attended, as in Allen v. Hyatt Regency 668 S.W. 2d 286, the relationship can be held to be a bailment and not one of licence.
:I added "unattended" to the text to clarify the parking garage example. Folklore1 (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Parking garage

message: The first sentence of this article was quoted verbatim (without citation) by Sheldon Cooper (Jim Parsons) on tonight's episode of The Big Bang Theory, "The Work Song Nanocluster". Just thought I'd mention it. --Arteitle (talk) 01:04, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is an interesting observation - we'll look into it. bd2412 T 16:36, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ''The Big Bang Theory''

message: What if during a bailment involving a house sitter responsible for protecting the bailor's house and pets, the bailor's pet dog is lost without a collar or identification; does the person finding and taking control of that lost dog, become the new bailee?  If yes, does the new bailee have the responsibility to protect and to return the dog to the bailor or to the house sitter? John Elw (talk) 16:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The person finding lost property is generally required to surrender that property to the true owner, if the true owner becomes known before the a statutory period set forth in the laws of the state. However, I doubt that a finder of lost property who makes such a return could be held accountable to injury to the property. bd2412 T 16:41, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

text: A bailee has superior title to anyone in the world except the true owner, so the finder would have the same duty to turn the pet over to the bailee (unless the true owner claimed it directly). bd2412 T 15:27, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Yes, but this is a voluntary bailment solely for the benefit of the true owner, so the finder is liable only for gross negligence (not for ordinary negligence) if for example the dog is injured. There might be a local statute which overrides this common-law rule, though. You'd have to check with someone familiar with the laws of your particular jurisdiction. bd2412 T 17:30, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: House-sitting question

message: Might be helpful to throw in a bit about the history of the concept.  The Hebrew Bible briefly addresses the concept of property that's taken from the person who's taken something for safekeeping (see Exodus 22), so presumably there are sources examining how this passage has been applied and/or relating its ideas to other concepts of bailment.  Nyttend (talk) 02:01, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: A photograph of a "no bailment" notice would be useful in this section if anyone could upload one. BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:39, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Terms
Talk:Reginald Vaughn Finley Sr.

message: This is a self-produced vanity page. Finley also has an "Infidel Guy" facebook page which has a grand total of 78 "likes" and a personal facebook page scattered with narcissistic self-taken "bathroom-mirror" style flex poses. A total non-entity who thinks his mundane life experiences are of riveting interest to everyone else. Nothing to see here.70.77.221.225 (talk) 08:04, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narcissism 

message: Vandalism against Reggie's page seems to be a bit out of hand. This page used to have a lot of accurate info about him, now it has nothing. After looking at the History, it seems he was slandard quite a bit and then the whole artical was basically erased. What happened? It's odd how some practicing religionist tend to result to character assassination, vandalism, and defamation on such a scale. Such actions at best give Atheist a sense of being right and Justified. ~ Technos —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.237.158.236 (talk • contribs) .
: A lot of the Vandalism was by Hebel, he needs to be reported and banned from Wikipedia, or at least his IP needs to be blacklisted so that he can no longer edit this page.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.237.158.236 (talk • contribs) .
::This diff shows Hebel's changes.  Why do you say that they are vandalism?  Mr Stephen 10:21, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: This article is a pig's breakfast.  Some of the content might be salvageable, though, if rewritten for tone and NPOV.  DancingPenguin 12:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  regarding freethoughtmedia, was merged here 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]]
Talk:Robert Angus Smith

message: Here is link to index entry in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography . I think that that resolves the notability issue. Improvements to article would be welcome from all editors. Cutler 20:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smith's notability 
Talk:Michael Scott

message: ----
Michael Scott news anchor for WAAY 31 in Huntsville, Al. Best known for having a lizard scare the crap out of him!
*Michael Scott — former news anchor at NBC5 Dallas, famous for funniest TV news blooper ever
--Mrtea 23:25, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

message: i fixed some links, reformatted, added more identifying info, moved one article (the sheriff mike scott), and added a few names. there are a lot of Michael Scott Xxx's, i added the most notable, but i hesitate to add more, and if WMOS says dont add michael scott rohan, i respectfully disagree but would go along with consensus.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:100BASE-T

message: that the minium frame size was increased to allow collision detection to be maintained? Plugwash 23:26, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not for fast ethernet - they got round the problem by reducing the maximum network diameter. In original ethernet there was the 5-4-3-2-1 rule (max 5 segments, max 4 repeaters, max 3 segments with hosts, 2 segments without hosts, for 1 single collision domain.) i.e. max network diameter of 2500 m. In fast ethernet you are only allowed a maximum of two repeaters (hubs) or only a single repeater if it is of a higher-latency type (type I /class I / can't remember the exact terminology). i.e. max diamater of 300 m. But it WAS increased IIRC for gigabit ethernet. --Ali@gwc.org.uk 14:17, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: is it correct

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:16, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:The Tain (EP)

message: Amazon.com lists two different releases of the album: one from Acuarela (Red100) and one from Kill Rock Stars.  Are there any differences between these two releases? JamesLucas (talk) 22:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different releases 
Talk:John Valby

message: Though John Valby may incur the wrath of the "family values" crowd, his brilliant, albeit risque humour, is not without its merit. Firstly, by smashing through the social norms, Valby encourages more societal criticism and allows for genuine truth to show through all the lies.
Secondly, Valby targets mainly those that deserve it. In doing such, he does society a great service in exposing the hypocrisy of contemporary moraise. Lastly, John Valby is just that damn good. He is capable of playing the piano as well as any romantic composer while maintaining a wider range of profanity than a sailor. I would like to see your contemporary rock groups top that! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.122.44.131 (talk) 23:50, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: From Hispanics to Irishmen, Polish to blacks, Arabs to rednecks, Republican and Democrats alike, no person and no group is safe from his wit and his piano.
"wit"?!? I hardly think so. FunnyYetTasty 09:47, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I saw him in the early '80's, in college of course.  I have a tape of a show, which I listened to a bunch in my early twenties.  That was when I was young and, um, stupid, and I thought it was all good because it was supposedly in the right light and in a positive egalitarian spirit.  Now I wish I didn't have those awful awful images in my head, and those horrible, yes hateful, lyrics that intrude back into my consciousness.  I'm not a reactionary "family values" guy (no way, no how), but I've come to know the nastiness of this kind of purportedly open-minded, free-speechifying entertainment.  Sorry, that's how I think now.  I regret exposing myself to it.  In the long run, I've found there to be little redeeming value, but a lot of fetid rot in my brain because of John Valby.
108.7.7.50 (talk) 23:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: My fetid rot.
Talk:Alexander Maconochie (penal reformer)

message: I have book sources that say he was a British Naval Officer not a Scottish one...please check if this is correct
He was a Scot, serving in the British Navy.
I have a number of Photographs of his grave stone, would anyone care to upload them for me ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vegnomeat (talk • contribs) 13:57, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Krishna Raja Wadiyar IV

message: It is surprising to see that both the articles were created the same day; similar set of editors has been contributing to both the articles and that the content is almost similar. I propose to retain this article as it is slightly better organised. I'd wait for comments for 5 days and then carry out the merger. Thanks, --Gurubrahma 00:19, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge notice

message: Removed :File:Group portrait of the Maharaja of Mysore and his brothers and sisters.jpg with caption "Group portrait of the Maharaja of Mysore and his brothers and sisters (Circa 1895)." because we have a picture of him from the same year. It's interesting, but we have this and others on Commons and there isn't a major need to feature both. Ranze (talk) 15:19, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Family photo

message: , this is related to your edit from 2007. Do you remember what you meant by "Current Biography 1940, p 833"? It still exists in the article. FacetsOfNonStickPans (talk) 13:48, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding a 2007 edit
Talk:Codex Calixtinus

message: The music section could benefit from considerable expansion, if someone is interested. --BillC 00:21, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a lot that I could say about it, when I get some more free time. Microtonal...(Put your head on my shoulder) 00:37, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Anyone who wishes is welcome to use any information on a site that I created a while back: Codex Calixtinus.  It specifically addresses the issue of music in the codex and I think I referenced everything I used sufficiently to be of some value. VectorPosse 19:48, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: More music
Talk:Danielle Calo

message: Note: The AfD for this article received a total of 11 votes (including the nominator), with 7 for delete and 4 for merge and redirect. Now, as most of the content has already been merged into Nick Lachey, I have turned this article into a redirect. - ulayiti (talk) 00:22, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Biographical Directory of the United States Congress

message: The duplication cited here has been removed and this article should be edited to reflect this.  2600:1004:B128:D9B3:554B:DF20:214A:F83B (talk) 02:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Technical detail" 

message: The website shows that the Biographical Directoy is developing a new website with up-to-date design (finally replacing the Internet design from the 90s), which will soon be beta tested. --SamWinchester000 (talk) 23:48, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New website
Talk:The Pew Charitable Trusts

message: If anyone's out there, let's vote. --RobbyPrather 00:51, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Pew Research Center]] into this article? 

message: The one source cited that PCT was an Opinion/Editorial Piece by Martin Wooster, whose opinion appears to be that major philanthropic trusts are mostly "liberal." I searched for a non-obviously-biased opinion upon this, and was unable to find anything. Anyone have any other sources? Safety Cap 21:47, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: PCT heavily underwrite National Public Radio, an organization often thought of as biased toward the liberal agenda. I see this mentioned nowhere in the wiki entry, but I find it important in a reader's perception of the Trust. Equally important - and less well known - would be the PCT's underwriting of perceived conservative media and causes. Perhaps someone could research and include this information?  Virga.flame (talk) 03:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Liberal"? 

message: Someone tried to put the well-documented failure of Pew's agenda in CT into the memory hole. Sorry folks, we listened to this crowd and three of my neighbors are now dead. Deal with the facts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.141.78 (talk) 15:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Whitewash of pro-felon policies

message: Removed due to blatant self serving opinion  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Furrybarry (talk • contribs) 18:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing self aggrandising letter by Pew CEO at the foot of the article

message: Corrections &Amplifications
UNDER FEDERAL tax law, the Pew Charitable Trusts will be permitted to spend as much as 5%
of the organization's annual budget on lobbying activities after it converts to a public
charity. An article Thursday incorrectly gave the figure as 20%. (WSJ Nov. 10, 2003)
Jonverve (talk) 20:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed this -- it was just at the end of article 
Talk:Bangka Belitung Islands

message: Bangka adalah pulau yang indah beberapa tahun sebelumnya. tapi kini sudah sangat memprihatinkan. banyak sekali lubang-lubang bekas penambangan timah yang dibiarkan begitu saja. harapan saya sebagai warga Bangka agar pemerintah dapat mengambil tindakan yang efektif demi kemajuan profinsi Bangka.
Translated by orangbiasa@yahoo.com, as follows;
"Bangka is a beautiful island years ago, but currently it is very much a pity for so many desolate ponds abandoned after the tin mining operation. My hope as Bangka people to the government is to take strict effective measures for the progress of Bangka province"
:Please write in english - this is english wikipedia! SatuSuro 22:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: is this... a joke...? you voice out your opinion... on wikipedia...? Ald™ ¬_¬™ 03:35, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsigned comment

message: The motto is shown as: 'Serumpun Sebalai', but on the logo and on the official website here it says 'Sepintu Sedulang'. I'm guessing this is a cut-and-paste error and will change it within the day unless someone lets me know why not.--Bwmodular 15:59, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, sorry, my mistake - 'Sepintu Sedulang' is the regency motto, not the province. --Bwmodular 17:06, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Motto shown
Talk:Alldeutscher Verband

message: It's better known under the name of Pan-German League.It should be renamed
--Molobo 16:06, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is a page for the Pan-German League, which is just the English name for this group. These two pages should be merged. --A.S. Brown (talk) 02:59, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Two Years Before the Mast

message: Can someone expand this? I find it horribly lacking in all areas.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.147.188.38 (talk • contribs) 01:36, 7 November 2005
:What does "all areas" refer to? Or was your question rhetorical. The article is not great, but its not bad, its much better than the same entry in Marriam Webster's Encyclopedia of Literature. Stbalbach 04:37, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Pardon me, but I thought the purpose of a discussion page is to dicuss the book's impact on readers.  I read the book while living in San Diego in the 70's, after one year at sea as an enlisted U.S. Navy sailor.  I learned more about the life at sea, the Pacific Ocean, and California history than I could have imagined was ever committed to paper.  Dana's description of putting to sea for the first time, with men barefoot scurrying about the deck and climbing the rigging in response to shouted, seemingly incomprehensable orders to be more authentic than my own recollection of the first time I put to sea.  I found the basic outline to be quite concise.  Dana is so much easier to understand than the unabridged version of Moby Dick; several chapters of which are preposterously technical.  Dana tells the reader how bad Whalers looked and smelled in just a few paragraphs.  As the all-time best non-fiction sea story, Sebastian Junger's Perfect Storm is aguably the only modern-day challenger.  The only way anyone could expand the outline "in all areas", would be to include the entire text.  W8IMP 07:26, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the purpose of the talk page is to discuss how to improve the article, although IMHO personal impressions such as yours are OK too, since they often have insights into ways to tweak the article. Stan 15:45, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Ditto on the purpose of this talk page, and ditton on the personal impressions too.  Basically, situation normal here.  I found the article to be concise and informative (and I've read the book).  If you want to fix something specific, propose it here or fire up the keyboard and do it.  --- 69.109.227.227 19:12, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: Below information was tagged for needing sources long-term. Feel free to reinsert with appropriate references. DonIago (talk) 12:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material
Talk:U.S. Route 130

message: from maps, some from :
*downtown Camden - 1927
*US 40 north of Pennsville - 1938? 1944?
*Pennsville - 1941?
*east end of DMB - 1952?
*NJTP/I-295 split - 1960
*east end of DMB - 1968
 says US 40 was realigned in 1929 to Pennsville. --SPUI (talk) 21:58, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: South end

message: The article has drawbridge over Raccoon Creek at south edge of Bridgeport.  At this writing, traffic is now 2-way on what will be southbound side of new high level bridge.  The drawbridge has to be removed because it stands in the path of what will be new northbound lanes.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlm0404 (talk • contribs) 04:05, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: bridge replacement in Gloucester County
Talk:Auxerre

message: How on earth is Auxerre Gallo-British? I'm pretty sure that Auxerre was in the territory of the Celtic Aedui, and the Aedui (unlike the Belgic polities) had no particular link to pre-Roman Britain, other than maybe indirect trade relations. Cynwolfe (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallo-British? 

message: Seems to make more sense as the ideal of Wikipedia is that data is held at a single point?
Nice little article overall - came across it because a friend was Facebooked as being there. Ender's Shadow Snr (talk) 22:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't the list of REGIONAL wines be a link to a list associated with an article on the region?
Talk:Round Table Conferences (India)

message: In the second round table conference sorojini Naidu participate 103.115.201.169 (talk) 15:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Round table conference 110.224.250.196 (talk) 17:27, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Round table is second third conference
Talk:Mike Peters (cartoonist)

message: does it matter that this is copy and pasted from the grimmy.com website?
:Haven't got a clue. I don't know what the copyright policy is like on Wikipedia, but at the very least I think the source should be properly mentioned. Oh, and btw please remember to sign your comments! Jonas Liljeström 17:37, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the page to  20:16, July 6, 2005 by Alan Liefting (see page history) for copyright violation. Yes, the page did, indeed, violate Wikipedia's copyright policies. (See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights) I reverted it to remove the violations. I searched through the history and hope I reverted to the best edit. I apologize if I did not, and someone who is more experienced in this process, feel free to take it into your own hands. Thanks! --Evening Breeze 12:06, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Moca, Dominican Republic

message: I am left wondering why this article was deleted when I created it back in July? I am pleased to see it has now been restored, SqueakBox 02:11, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted?
Talk:Credenza desk

message: There is more to the meaning of credenza than a piece of furniture, I can not put my finger on it but some how I know that it has to do with either an introduction or perhaps an intrusion or protrusion or some sort of interuption. I'll keep looking.
It's sometimes used as a synonym of creed or credence, but not exactly.  And then we are going in religion and philosophy, with articles full of revert wars and flying dirt, so I am not touching this stuff.  Good luck!  Please go on, the brave are needed for this endeavour.  And when we stay within furniture, a credenza is a sideboard or buffet with paneled storage at the bottom and no legs. --AlainV 04:14, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Why not just put a picture of Credenza desk here?
If you have one that meets the intellectual property guidelines of Wikipedia put it there.  I don't have one that meets those standards.  --AlainV 17:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture
Talk:The Descent

message: Resources to utilize. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources 

message: It says location is in Scotland for the external shots but I am sure that they are in fact North Wales - the external long shots clearly show Swallow Falls which is North Wales, see http://www.attractions-north-wales.co.uk/attraction.asp?loc=10 80.176.79.35 (talk) 20:59, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: Juno's pendant was a gift from Paul, who is Sarah's deceased husband. This means that Paul cheated on Sarah with Juno. This further encouraged Sarah to hurt Juno.  --189.202.11.69 (talk) 03:34, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to put more emphasis on the "love each day" being a revelation for Sarah. I just couldn't find a way to make it more obvious that Juno and Paul cheated on Sarah without making it overkill. --uKER (talk) 16:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juno's pendant 
Talk:Georgiana Bruce Kirby Preparatory School

message: I went to kirby as a charter student in 1994. At that time there was 7-10th grade offered, the following year (1995) 11th was added and the following (1996) 12th grade was added. Not sure where the facts for this article are gotten from but it is way off.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.143.81.62 (talk) 04:05, 25 July 2009 (UTC)