lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:In2TV

message: I went to the site, and it seems to not have any shows I could find to watch or download or whatever. Instead, there's this is thingy that informs a user about something about classic TV.
[]
Coffee4binky (talk) 16:25, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What's Up Now?

message: Seems they don't let you download episodes anymore, someone should mention that. 67.49.103.98 (talk) 06:27, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Animaniacs has already been added by now (along with Batman: The Animated Series), so I won't be surprised if Tiny Toons shows up later as well. Thus, I believe the show list should be reinstated to the article.Nintendo Maximus 00:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yo.

message: Hey Guys, I'm sorry there has been so much editing going on to the page --- I never meant to delete or insult anyone's work. In fact, you guys did an EXCELLENT Job. Truth is I'm actually an assistant working in a production company and it's my responsibility to maintain this page and use the text that was given to me from the higher ups ---- you see, the text I've been posting is the official summary for IN2TV...And if I don't keep it secure I might lose my job!!!
So I hope you guys can understand that in no way am I trying to bash your work or anything --- in fact, I really appreciate how loyal you guys are to the page! 
So please guys! Please let me post the official entry, edit free (though I know that is really not allowed). Thank you! It would mean a lot to me!
PS:  Nintendo Maximus, thank you for your dedication and great work :) I hope this is okay with you...
-2cmedia
:I assume this is a joke, if not AOL is more clueless then I imagined. Datacharge 09:47, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A PLEA TO STOP ENTRY EDITING 

message: Hi! 
Is there a way to watch the cartoons here in Europe ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.186.120.142 (talk) 13:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Europe? 

message: I was on In2TV the other day and noticed that they only had some of the episodes of a show listed on there.  Has anyone else seen this and does this worthy a mention in the article? Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 14:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacking in episodes 

message: Is there any proof of any of these shows appearing in the future?  If not, they should be removed. Modor (talk) 20:25, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Future" shows 

message: the link so the original Battlestar Galatica wasn't going to the right place. Fixed it. 97.90.79.161 (talk) 13:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed 

message: Is this website still on? What's the deal? I think this article is badly outdated. Apple8800 (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ???
Talk:Nixtamalization

message: I'm confused. The common wisdom stated in this article is that nixtamalization reduces incidence of pellagra by unlocking the niacin in the corn. So I looked at the nutrition facts of hominy, and the niacin content is so negligible that even if you ate a gallon of it per day you should still get pellagra if you have no other sources of niacin in your diet. Apparently corn is a virtually niacin-free food no matter what you do to it. So that still leaves the question unanswered, of how the Aztecs weren't getting pellagra, because clearly nixtamalization wasn't the reason. Succubus MacAstaroth (talk) 17:09, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: FAO (1992) says nixtamalization prevents pellagra by unlocking tryptophan, which gets converted into niacin by humans (but not by cats). I guess that's the explanation. And yep, your comment just pushed me to change it. Artoria2e5 🌉 14:19, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Niacin in nixtamalized corn
Talk:Never at War

message: War and liberal democracy can be defined in different ways. Research often define war as any military action with more than 1000 killed in battle. This is the definition used in the Correlates of War Project which has also supplied the data regarding the wars for many of the studies. 
Repetitious. Also ignores the obvious point that 1000 deaths was chosen, not for any inherent advantage, but because it was the limit of a pre-existing database. Septentrionalis 19:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the definition used in most conflict studies. Also the studies using MIDs use it since they exclude wars.Ultramarine 06:09, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Please explain. Ultramarine 12:17, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Definitions

message: I am continuing my work on User:Ultramarine/Possible exceptions to "Well-established democracies have never made war on one another". I have included more conflicts as requested by other users. I will add more. I would like more explanations from the literature regarding which wars are claimed to be exceptions and why.Ultramarine 03:44, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible exceptions to "Well-established democracies have never made war on one another" 2 

message: Allegedly, Israel vs. the Gaza Strip. 204.52.215.107 (talk) 03:42, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Argument against "Never at War"
Talk:Sang Nguyen

message: Ambi claims that the "allegations" against Nguyen are not made by the people listed. Not so, there are very general allegations anyway with no evidence from a reporter and then a series of Nguyen's factional opponents making variously negative and general statements about stacking.
You can't have it both ways. It's either about Nguyen or it's not. If the link is to stay, then the reference should be put in its full context so it does not mislead readers.
Ambi professes on her user page not to be a member of a political party, implying she has no political agenda. I believe that claim sits uncomfortably with her constant reverting of this and other articles about ALP figures. DarrenRay 03:42, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're entirely welcome to link to the interview so people can read it in context, but you're entirely not welcome to put your own personal slant on it - something not backed up by the source. I'm only having to revert articles about ALP figures because of your flagrantly biased editing of those same articles. Ambi 03:50, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  You are reverting without regard to the content, that much is clear from this and other articles. I am very disappointed about conduct of that nature. DarrenRay 04:10, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I've deleted it for now, as I think Garglebutt makes a fair point. I'll see if I can find some better sources in the next few days, but otherwise I think it's fair to concede that the transcript on its own is not strong enough to warrant mentioning here. Ambi 05:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's very welcome but let's not have a re-run of the same debate. Any allegations of branch-stacking must be put in context and the context is that everyone makes these claims. Many people say Carlo Carli is a branch-stacker, what are the status of these allegations? Not much, they come from his factional rivals. So we need to see these claims in context, they are almost never followed up. Very few people are ever charged with it in the ALP, I can only think of one case involving Mohammad Abbouche and that was tossed out due to lack of evidence. So let's keep this standard factional claim into perspective. --2006BC 05:11, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not disagreeing with you. If I put this material back in, it'll be markedly better sourced. Ambi 05:19, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Meadow Soprano

message: Please refrain from adding "probable" facts that you've discovered or concluded on your own.  Those constitute original research and POV ideas.  If not, then please cite.
:Please sign posts using OsFan 17:25, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Why are this and other Soprano's related articles written in the past tense? I am not going to edit this article since others are also written in the past tense, but it seems very odd to me, as articles (including academic articles) about films, plays and novels are usually written in the present tense.Nicklash (talk) 20:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure I get your point. The article says that she "is" a character, that she "is" the first-born child, and in the final episode, she "is" shown outside the diner and she "is" late for the family dinner. In Soprano world, she eventually becomes an adult; so references to her teen years state that she "was" aware and that she "reconciled" with her family, because it refers to the past when she was a teen. Could it say that in her teens she "is" aware and that she "reconciles" with her family, but to me it makes more sense to describe that in past tense. I don't think it would make sense to say that "since her graduation, Meadow studies for medical school" because she eventually stops studying for med school. Can you point out specific instances where past tense doesn't make sense? Cresix (talk) 23:05, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tense
Template talk:Catfd

message: I've now managed to fix my erroneous CFD with the
[ DRV] process, but the closing sysop 
immediately repeated my error and sent it back to CFD.
This category deletion policy detail is really not obvious. -- Omniplex 08:51, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:User kon]] 

message: It's now at the Template:Catfd/doc subpage. +mwtoews 17:25, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved documentation

message: Please participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Deletion discussions#Have all XfD be substituted and link to the actual page of discussion. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have all XfD be substituted and link to the actual page of discussion
Talk:Bonnybridge

message: why has the Bonnybridge page not been developed to include the UFO issue? I am not suggesting that there has been concerted censorship. But it is weird after all this time there is no recognition that something was happening in Bonnybridge. Even something as simplistic as the first historical UFO sighting in Bonnybridge is not included. Why? This is Scottish/British history we are talking about now. there should be some sort of historical recognition of this. --Redblossom (talk) 14:33, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Redblossom To answer your question of why, perhaps one reason is that you are one of the editors who have not written the content you would like included. Please go ahead and make the attempt, finding quality sources.SovalValtos (talk) 15:43, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no recognition of the Bonnybridge UFO issue?!
Talk:Van and Schenck

message: Further info see Find-A-Grave. Lincher 04:00, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add: Note a few short B/W numbers by Van & Schenck on Metro Movietone Revues #1 & #2... from late 1929 to 1930. Can be viewed under features section on Warner Bro DVD #65286 named " MGMs The Broadway Melody 1929" also won Academy Award "Best Picture 1929"
-Does anyone know if they played in Britain during the first world war ? Johncmullen1960 (talk) 11:37, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This bit was tacked onto the front of the article, I guess by a descendant looking into family genealogy.
:"Joseph Schenck (on the right) was a very talented and light hearted pianist from a large poor very musical immigrant family.  His grandfather was George Schenck and his grandmother was Barbara Gehringer of Heidelberg Germany.  His mother Margret Graupner Schenck was called Maggie and his father Sebastian Schenck was remembered as being called Butch.  His family are beginning to construct his correct genealogy.  His mother and aunt were also once billed as the Gaupner Sisters, a singing and dancing act on Vaudeville."
If any of that info gets a place in the article, it needs to be a different place than by shoving Van out of the way in the lede. 67.243.29.174 (talk) 13:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  family genealogy
Talk:Slough Trading Estate

message: According to Google calculator 700,000 hectares is 2,702 square miles.  Shurly shome mishtake? Joe D (t) 04:07, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article (together with Slough's lead) seems to contradict the (sourced) points at Trafford Park about size and age. Are we sure the content is verifiable? -- Jza84 · (talk) 01:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For anyone researching history of the Leigh Road Bridge replacement, check out these two YouTube videos...
:Leigh Road Bridge story - Oct 2015 - (Osbourne - YouTube)
:Road Bridge Launch - Mar 2015 - (SEGRO - YouTube)
There's also a Geograph image of the original bridge: Leigh Road bridge - geograph.org.uk - 206656.jpg
EdJogg (talk) 18:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources - Leigh Road Bridge replacement
Talk:Norman Vaughan (comedian)

message: Different dates than on Find-A-Grave. Lincher 04:11, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: One user had raised question about Norman Vaughan's date of birth. As per the user, his DOB is Jun and not Apr. Can someone please verify? Thanks  AKS 20:00, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth
Talk:Barrel of Monkeys

message: why are all the monkeys in the barrel of monkeys red?  how not cool is that, and when did that happen?  the ones i remember had blue and yellow ones, i'm sure....
== picture? ==
Would be nice to add a pic to see what it looks like. --74.85.33.123 (talk) 20:53, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Shahbaz (bird)

message: I'd do it myself but frankly I'm not sure what this article is trying to say in the first place.  It doesn't strike me as worthy of deletion, as there does seem to be content there. --Deville (Talk) 04:13, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Apart from the semi-mythical bird (it seems to be based on an actual animal, but I have not tried to see whether it's possible to tie it down to an actual species) which apparently was in ancient times trained for carrying messages, it's also a not uncommon name in Iran and Pakistan and it was the name of the last Shah's personal jetliner: . But we seem to need an editor who known Persian, I cannot make anything of what Google finds. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 08:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with the text

message: This edit on December 27, 2009 removed the old text, links, and categories. In order that the necessary changes be performed in a proper manner, I am reinstating the original version and pasting the new text here instead. The edit summary was "The Shahbaz is not a mythical bird but is one which is truly used in falconry in Persia, Afghanistan, ...".
The Shahbaz, or hawk-king, a large grey goshawk with yellow eyes, caught in the hills of A%hanistan and its surrounding regions, brought down to the plains and sold. The tiercelet or male, is, as usual, much smaller than the female, and is called Jurrah, in Persian "the active." Both are uncommonly strong and fero- cious. They are accounted the noblest birds in the sport of falconry.
__meco (talk) 19:19, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: may be it help you, [] this is shahbaz not Falcon !188.165.156.229 (talk) 14:26, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Not mythical, used in falconry

message: The Achaemenids followed the teachings of the prophet Zoroastar peace be upon him. They were not pagan. 94.110.167.88 (talk) 06:41, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shahbaz was not a God 
Talk:Pixley (Green Acres)

message: Just like to note where the 50 miles from Hooterville came from. The Shady Rest was said to be halfway between Hooterville and Pixley. In an episode of Petticoat Junction it is said that the hotel is 25 miles from Hooterville. So that means it would be another 25 miles to Pixley. 25+25 = 50.  This unsigned comment was posted by anonymous editor IP address 68.187.211.69 on 10 March 2006. 
:So, its a big county.  Rlquall 13:34, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Genocide bombing

message: This article seems pretty skewed, to say nothing of poorly written. It's really not my field, though, so I hope someone can help fix it up. Cantara 04:16, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just checked all of the pages linked from external links, and not one of them used the term "genocide bomb" anywhere in them. Google only comes up with 525 hits, but does appear to include some actual genuine uses of this silly term. I'm going to remove the existing external links and toss in one that appears to indicate an origin for it, . Not that I've done much extensive research. Bryan 04:25, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Might make more sense, but unfortunately Wikipedia can only reflect actual usage "out there" rather than trying to dictate what it should be. If you can find sources using the term like that then by all means add them, though. Bryan 00:53, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Simon Hobart

message: I used the following sources:
http://www.alternativelondonmagazine.com/intheghetto.htm
http://www.popstarz.org/html/bios/aboutsimon.html
http://www.pinknews.co.uk/news/articles/2005-593.html
Aroundthewayboy 23:08, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was originally a women's night, but that has changed as it became more popular. Also, that original popstarz.org link is no longer valid, but you can still get to the Simon bio by navigating through the flash links on popstarz.org. Aroundthewayboy 05:19, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Veto override

message: I added some links to reports done by the CRS on veto overrides.  They are almost identical since Bush hasn't used the veto yet, but from different sources.  Open CRS is a good repository, and it seems a bit sad that this taxpayer funded research isn't available straight from the original source. --Chris Heath 04:30, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page is badly in need of a re-write and some attention. I'll do what I can with my job but we might need to call in some others. JasonCNJ (talk) 21:22, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Just to mention, a number of political systems feature a veto override.  For instance, in Niger a Presidential veto may be overridden at %50 +1.  This article needs the attention of a political scientist.  T L Miles (talk) 03:12, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Globalize

message: This form of Democracy is only found in the United States. The 2/3 majority vote of is unique to the House of Representatives and Senate.
This statement is flagrantly wrong, and is contradicted by information in the veto article itself, which incidentally supersedes this article in every way. Delete this article. Even if it were not wrong it would be superfluous. --70.131.112.177 (talk) 22:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest merging it with the Veto-article itself, perhaps as a subsection since the clarification that this often is an explicit power in tandem with the veto power itself. I put up a suggestion for it. -84.48.119.82 (talk) 09:29, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  +1 for merging --boarders paradise (talk) 11:09, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad article, no treat
Talk:Tom DeLay campaign finance trial

message: Is this page intended to discuss all corruption investigations related to Tom DeLay, including, for example, the Jack Abramoff scandal? Or is it to be centered on DeLay's indictment. If the latter, and possibly even if the former, it should probably be renamed. NatusRoma | Talk 04:45, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: the scope of this page

message: The infobox on this page lists DeLay's "convictions" as money laundering and conspiracy to violate election law (a charge which has been dismissed).  This should be changed to "charges" rather than "convictions" and the latter should probably be removed, or at least listed as a dismissed charge.  I understand that the format of this infobox will not allow this, so perhaps this infobox should be removed altogether (at least until the trial is complete).  As much as I hate to say anything in DeLay's defense, he hasn't been convicted yet.76.184.126.174 23:39, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Error in 'Criminal' infobox

message: Consider this information
- Democrats tried to derail redistricting by fleeing the state, and DeLay opposed it. Earle, a Democrat who predominately prosecuted Republicans, goes after him.
- Earle, originally indicted DeLay for alleged acts that predated passage of the law that they supposedly violated. Indictment dismissed with prejudice.
- Then, Earle presented evidence of alleged 'money laundering' to a 2nd grand jury which, despite intimidation by Earle, rejected him again, refusing to issue an indictment. 
- However, Earle went to a third grand jury, 3 days later, and finally obtained an indictment on the money laundering charge.
- The charge is extremely questionable because of a complete absence of evidence. The indictment alleges that there was a MEMO instructing the two other defendants to substitute specific soft money contributions for hard money contributions. That alleged memo is the key.
- However, defense counsel requested a copy of the document referenced in the indictment (remember, the only evidence supporting the allegations), and the prosecution was forced to admit that, while they think it exists, they’ve never seen it and don’t know anyone who has. Most people would call this indictment a joke and Earle’s shenanigans are every bit as egregious as what was alleged of DeLay. 
- Aug 22, 2008, Austin’s 3rd Court of Appeals held that the state’s money-laundering statute in effect in 2002, meant to address drug-money-laundering, did not cover checks, only cash. http://www.law.com/jsp/tx/PubArticleTX.jsp?id=1202424047840
- The alleged money-laundering of DeLay and associates involved only checks. There is nothing illegal that the prosecution can show a jury. There simply will be no conviction.
24.153.223.151 (talk) 00:17, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of Page generally presumes guilt of DeLay

message: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/conviction-ex-us-house-leader-delays-tossed
http://images.bimedia.net/documents/tom-delay-appeal-doc-12D.pdf
Can someone plug this in correctly?
69.250.189.138 (talk) 17:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conviction overturn, acquittal issued
Talk:List of Hulk supporting characters

message: Do you think we should split the bad guys from the good guys? Rtkat3 (talk) 3:19, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Section Split

message: Overall, none of these seem to have any real potential to really expand to GA quality or anything else. It would be best to merge them until such a time. TTN (talk) 21:31, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, if any of them aren't actually primary Hulk villains, they can be placed into another appropriate list. TTN (talk) 21:32, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Utilizing such a broad and sweeping proposal fails to provide a foundation for meaningful collaboration.  But as stands, I would not agree to such a merge as character of Wendigo and Hulkbusters are established characters with an strong and growing history. -Sharp962 (talk) 23:29, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

text: - J Greb (talk) 00:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree 100%. (JoeLoeb (talk) 02:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Captain Omen. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:23, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Captain Omen listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The Fortress of Solitude (novel)

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 09:04, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled