Talk:Janggu

message: Isn't the original spelling with an "o" at the end, like jwago, sogo, and all the other Korean drums?  I think "janggu" is a variant spelling.  Badagnani 21:01, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: the word is apparently is derived from 杖鼓, but is firmly established as "janggu", although "janggo" is occasionally used. Appleby 21:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: it is true, the character 鼓 is today pronounced as "go" in korea, and the janggu is the most popular of the traditional drums. i don't know if this is relevant, but according to , janggu (at least the hanja name) was imported from china during the tang dynasty; the -go instruments were ancient chinese 大晟 instruments imported to korea during china's song dynasty. i'm just trying to translate from that page, the ambiguity of "ancient" is in the original. Appleby 22:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There are more words like janggu. Some loans more or less obviously derived from Chinese (like bungeo and perhaps taekkyeon) are pronounced in a way that differs from the standard pronunciation of the individual hanja corresponding to the hànzì which are used to write the Chinese original. These words are normally not considered hanja words and hence not written with hanja – compare  (top result) and  (top result): the header for janggu does not contain any hanja, presumably because the word's gu does not match the way  is pronounced in other words (go). Probably because of this aberration, the word is interpreted as merely derived from , whereas janggo is considered defective, but has its hanja  in the header, presumably because this form's pronunciation fits the hanja's standard pronunciation. The  goes so far as to omit any hanja in ojingeo's etymology, which has the same -ngeo ←  as is found in bungeo, (r)ingeo etc. Wikipeditor 22:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation/spelling

message: This article, due to its focusing on an instrument with great prevalence throughout Korean culture (in both music and dance), should probably not be categorized of the lowest importance.  Badagnani 12:47, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance 

message: As you requested in the history page. I deleated nothing from the original post, i just organize them. you can track down every point available in the original post somewhere in the new post with new additional information. some point like its hourglass shape and it being korean traditional instrument is mentionaed more than once and therefore redundant. the history of the instrument is mentioned on the second and sixth paragraph is grouped togather. and also gramatical error is corrected. although my grammar is not perfect also :p. I added a new section 'external links' to let other people to post relavant material for the instrument. so, i started with a crappy video instead. Since you wrote the last postings, please include a new section to the post at before external links indicating your references to complete the page. thanks.  I do deleated mention about buk because it is different instrument and should be in the buk page instead. Simon18i 07:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You changed many sentences and words from good grammar and properly spelled English to bad grammar and improperly spelled English. Why did you do that? Badagnani 08:23, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

text: The information you are adding seems good. It is always great to have editors with expertise in Korean traditional music. Do you play and study it? Regarding hanja, can you add them? I assume you have a Korean IME that includes hanja. I have it too, but I think you know it better. Badagnani 19:33, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Badagnani

message: Why doesn't the yogo appear here? Badagnani 19:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Yogo

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Janggu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001034634/http://www.visitseoul.net/en/article/article.do?_method=view&art_id=3079&lang=en&m=0004007001006&p=07 to http://www.visitseoul.net/en/article/article.do?_method=view&art_id=3079&lang=en&m=0004007001006&p=07
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:51, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion 

message: "It is available in most kinds, and..."
What is this supposed to mean? 117.110.113.183 (talk) 04:09, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd sentence