lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Copyright situations by country

message: According to the Danish Consolidated Act on Copyright of 2003 (§70, 2) all photographic images not considered to be "works of art" become public domain 50 years after they were created. kalaha 16:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but if that's anything like German law (and it probably is), nearly all photographs are considered "works of art". – Quadell (talk) (random) 17:54, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public domain in Denmark 

message: I noticed on this page that Bhutan was listed as no treaty and this made me curious how the Bhutan government views copyright.  I think the entry must be incorrect since it says 'No treaty'  The first thing I find for Bhutan seems to suggest that Bhutan's government thinks it is party to the Berne Treaty on Copyrights:
:Take the case of Bhutan and India, our closest friend and next-door neighbour since both States are contracting parties of the Berne Convention. 
From http://www.ipbhutan.gov.bt/what_is_copyright.aspx - site of the Intellectual Property Division, Ministry Of Economic Affairs, Royal Government of Bhutan
See also http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/remarks.jsp?cnty_id=1796C
rs2 (talk) 17:01, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Bhutan??

message: http://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ38a.pdf contains the following quotes :
Yemen  ·  Berne (Paris) July 14, 2008; WTO June 26, 2014
another quote:
WTO  ·  World Trade Organization (WTO), established pursuant to the Marrakesh Agreement of Apr. 15, 1994, to implement the Uruguay Round Agreements. The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual  Property Rights (TRIPS) is one of the WTO agreements. It includes substantive obligations for the protection of copyright and other intellectual property rights as well as their enforcement. The effective date of United States membership in the WTO is Jan. 1, 1995.
This source can probably be used to update and improve the page, I have added it as an external link for now.
The Quixotic Potato (talk) 12:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yemen 

message: According to [] the normal copyright term is now life +70. ww2censor (talk) 12:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Serbia and Montenegro

message: This page has had  on it for seven years. An actively maintained version of this page exists, however; I think we should just soft-redirect this to Commons:Copyright rules by territory, a much more comprehensive, detailed, and accurate set of pages that serve the same function. Snowmanonahoe (talk · contribs · typos) 02:49, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've redirected the page; if anyone wants to recycle some of the content it's always in the page history. Frostly (talk) 01:22, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is redundant
Talk:Trans Adriatic Pipeline

message: Please stop revert warning and messing internal links. We have an article about this country, which named Republic of Macedonia, so this name should be used also in this article. You are welcome to use FYROM or Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, while the article named Republic of Macedonia will be renamed accordingly.Beagel 05:35, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of Macedonia

message: Could anybody to create a map of this pipeline? The map from the company is available at this page, but unfortunately this is not free for use. Beagel (talk) 19:26, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article now includes a map so I removed the map requested template. Transpoman (talk) 17:06, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: The 'Political support' section currently includes three sentences; of them two sentences are about signing intergovernmental documents which is an integral part of the history of this project. Therefore I propose to merge this section with the 'History' section. Beagel (talk) 05:51, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political support 

message: The length of the Trans Adriatic Pipeline is different now (approx. 870 km), and the starting point too (Kipoi at the Turkish-Greek border, not Komotini). All the key facts are on the first page of this document prepared by an independent organisation, for example. ( http://www.energy-community.org/pls/portal/docs/2052179.PDF ) or on the official website ( http://www.trans-adriatic-pipeline.com/tap-project/route/)
The Route and Techincal description repeat some of the information, which is probably not necessary (total length, offshore length).
The map needs to show full line starting at the Greek-Turkish border, not at Komotini, but at Kipoi.
There were quite many important developments recently, like Third Party Access exemption granted by the European Commission and National energy regulators. (http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/17/energy-gas-pipelines-idUSL6N0DY2W320130517 ) or here is the official document published by the European Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/energy/infrastructure/exemptions/doc/doc/gas/2013_tap_decision_en.pdf)
The section  Alternative projects has outdated information (and contradicts correct information from the Supply Sources section): Greece-Italy pipeline or more correctly ITGI project is not Trans Adriatic Pipeline's competitor any longer, it has been excluded from the competition by Shah Deniz Consortium. TAP is currently in competition with Nabucco West. Klaipeda alice (talk) 07:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs updates: route, map, political developments
Talk:Habitual residence

message: I am a Canadian law professor teaching Conflict of Laws, and offering my students the option of editing Wikipedia articles on this topic. One or more of those students plan to work on it over the course of the term, in conjunction with the article on domicile. Definitional issues, as noted above, will be addressed. LexLife (talk) 17:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planned edits
Talk:Gingival enlargement

message: The page has been moved because of the application of erroneous pathologic terminology.  See initial paragraph of article for a more in depth explanation. DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 16:56, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Merge the two they r the same  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.169.155.212 (talk) 18:09, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A redirect will suffice; the other page already mentions essentially everything here. --BDD (talk) 23:57, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4357916/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 08:17, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Australian Labor Students

message: There was only one vote for merge, and it (and any other alternatives) were more than swamped by the keep votes for Australian Labor Students. I will be making that editorial decision to keep the article split, and since it just (easily) survived a deletion discussion, I will push for a speedy keep should someone insist on wasting our time again. Rebecca 06:10, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wrong - there were 7 deleters (including nominator) to 4 keepers. TerriersFan 16:59, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. There were, in the last incarnation, four keepers, one merge, and one deleter. If you wish to merge, you need to get a consensus to do that merge. Rebecca 17:24, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

text: It just survived an AfD. Accordingly, if it is nominated again, I will be pushing for a speedy keep for disruption. ("I didn't get my way this time, maybe if I do the same thing again tomorrow I might"). Rebecca 03:14, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, I've looked and I can't find any; as far as I can see this article fails WP:V and WP:N. There are no RS on Google here and little on Google archives here. Certainly, there is nothing to underpin 99% of the content. This is why I suggested a merge was the best solution but Rebecca is insisting on a separate article and undoes my merges. TerriersFan 02:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is more to sourcing than a Google search, and this is not where those of us who argued to keep the article got our sources. What you're failing to recognise is that you are not charged with deciding what is in your opinion the best outcome for the article - you're charged with interpreting the consensus that is there. Moreover, the merged version of National Union of Students looked absolutely ridiculous - the content didn't fit there at all. Rebecca 03:13, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fine, but we have moved on from the AfD to discussing how best to deal with the article - will you please cite those sources or suggest a less 'absolutely ridiculous' merge target? TerriersFan 15:39, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:SS Tuscania (1914)

message: The sinking of the Tuscania in 1918 made headline news in Europe and North America. Additionally, her sinking has historical interest because she was the only vessel sunk while carrying American troops to Europe during WWI. Consequently, I have rated this article as having "Mid" importance. Antidespotic 17:04, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: During WWI, the 20th Engineers was a full-fledged Regiment with several subordinate battalions (see the citation).  Today, the unit has been deactivated and reduced in strength and is contemporarily referred to as a "battalion" (a lesser echelon element).  Does this merit a change? FromHereOn (talk) 23:12, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Army Units On Board - Consider 20th Engineer "Regiment" instead?
Talk:Renall Street railway station

message: This page needs an image of rennel street station before the rebuild, I think in have one somewhere.... - Palmeriain (talk) 00:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There already is such an image, one I posted for the original article before I was able to get some new images of the station after its rebuild.  – Matthew25187 (talk) 01:36, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

text: hey Matthew, ive found mine (not as good as I hoped for) and uploaded it to the Gallery, I've also add yours which is way better than mine - Palmeriain (talk) 11:31, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Kapiti Line

message: The template used in this article -  is not used on any other article. We should either standardise the other four lines on this template, or remove the Rail in wellington one. My preference is to remove the Rail in wellington template, mainly because we already use the standard  on all the other articles except this one. --Lholden (talk) 06:16, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Template

message: Needs to be updated to "Kapiti Line". I've manually edited a few stations but realised it was causing the template to break. Does anyone know of someone who can edit it? The template itself is locked. --LJ Holden 20:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Try posting a request as per :Category:Wikipedia protected edit requests. — Matthew25187 (talk) 21:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  S-line template 
Talk:Alvin Robinson

message: At least put it up for a regular deletion vote.  Check out the article for UFC 73.  He's the only fighter on the main card that doesn't have a Wikipedia article.  He's also a champion in a smaller organization, and he has a contract with the UFC.  Most people with that much visibility in the MMA world have Wikipedia articles.  Chicken Wing 13:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not for speedy deletion 
Talk:Chhet Sovanpanha

message: Hmmmmmm. This young woman has been singing for less than two years and the article claims she has sold "more than 15 million" albums domestically. That's very impressive. The current population of Cambodia is very close to 13 million persons - therefore she has sold enough for 1.15 albums for every man woman and child in the country. Now I don't have any of her albums, nor do my wife and three kids - so perhaps there are a few more of us who haven't bought her albums. I'll give it a little while then this wee piece of advertising gets a serious makeover. Paxse 17:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: going. going gone. Paxse 10:08, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Synthetic Liquid Fuels Program

message: The 98th and 99th Congresses were not exclusively Democrat. The Senate had Republican majorities and the House was often unable to oppose the President's initiatives. I added the reference to the CRS Report for Congress; Oil Shale: History, Incentives, and Policy. I'm uncertain of the 8 billion dollar amount that was already posted; is it in constant dollars? There have a multitude of U.S. Synthetic Fuel Efforts over the years through grants, organizational funding and price supports. For now I'll leave the $ 8 billion until it can be better researched.LarG (talk) 18:05, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Ideal Home

message: In a clear-cut abuse of process, a predecessor to this article was deleted after a contested prod was restored. Why do we have admins who don't read policy before they act? I can't even find out who was responsible for this outrage. Piccadilly 17:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've attempted to explain the outrage you talk about.  Contesting a prod consists of more than just deleting it and doing nothing to the article.  Once more, provide verifiable secondary sources to back your claims of notability and there's no problem.  Easy if it's "one of the best known magazines in the UK" as you have already stated.  Best wishes, The Rambling Man 18:17, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are just wrong about procedure. I'm not interested in this magazine, but when I see misconduct on Wikipedia, I fight it in the interests of this project. Piccadilly 22:20, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine, but you must assert notability by provision of reliable sources.  Do that and the article remains.  Lazily removing prod's without remedying the situation is wholly inappropriate.  The Rambling Man 22:39, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no such obligations. Prod was introduced for uncontroversial deletions, and this is not uncontroversial. I don't know anything about the magazine, but despite my complete lack of interest in its subject matter I know it is prominent. I have no duty to write any article, but I have helped wikipedia by saving an article about a topic that has been neglected due to systemic bias, ie we don't cover the interests of middle aged women well. Your attempts to make me feel guilty are absurd. If we don't want other people to be put to the (entirely voluntary) trouble of writing articles, what are we doing involved with Wikipedia at all? Piccadilly 22:57, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Marnie Schulenburg

message: An explanation: I removed references to, e.g., "September" with no year because, with the passage of time, it becomes harder to determine which September is meant. I suspect 2006 is the year for such references in the previous version of this article, but I couldn't verify that with a quick web search.
Km256 17:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Offset (wheel)

message: It says it's lacking a source, but the source listed at the bottom has all the info in the article as far as I could tell...is not that enough? -67.140.95.98 17:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Doesn't the ET dimension on the drawing represent a negative offset? I think this is confusing. The drawing with caption should be self-explanatory without having to read the article.
121.44.52.61 (talk) 22:16, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ET
Talk:Narthex

message: Is this still a stub? It seems pretty comprehensive in present form. JimScott 17:41, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this a stub ? 

message: The note about the cartographic convention seems to be contradicted by the image, which depicts a church with the liturgical east end at the top. 65.213.77.129 (talk) 14:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: cartographic convention
Talk:Mills & Boon

message: The whole section on their reputation and how 'upmarket' bookstores don't carry their novels sounds very subjective.  It should be rewritten objectively.Lijakaca 17:46, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reputation and subjective voice

message: I've put a brief reference in regarding this but as this must be a controversial claim (i'm sure there're m&b fans out there who would strongly disagree) someone might like to find a source that puts across the other side of the argument
--131.111.247.135 (talk) 20:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Claims of misogyny

message: There should be a section on the movie and/drama spinoffs - I believe a search on IMDB would yield results. I hope someone will put the section in as I haven't got time to do it myself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.55.242.229 (talk) 05:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie spinoffs
Talk:Internal Security Forces

message: the term "Internal Security Forces" is hardly unique to lebanon. cant we specify the country in the subject line? 155.213.224.59 (talk) 14:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal Security Forces 
Talk:Abdulmajid Tapa Tchermoev

message: I don't think it's the proper English spelling. --Captain Obvious and his crime-fighting dog (talk) 19:43, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: What happens to Tapa Tchermoeff after 1919?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.69.242.8 (talk) 08:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  After 1919
Talk:Lajkonik

message: Is it the Budenovka, or the Bashlyk, or something else that belongs at Pointed hat? But there is no mention of any hats at Tatars. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:35, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "... a Tatar in a characteristic pointed hat"
Talk:Thomasian Martyrs

message: There is little information in Antonio Gonzalez that isn't already here. As there are only nine of them, keeping the information on one page, rather than scattered over several would seem more concise. Mannanan51 (talk) 22:56, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 05:35, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggested
Talk:The Rave/Eagles Club

message: This article needs a history section. I believe before it was run by The Rave, it was known as The Eagles Club. Back in the sixties, and prior, it was Devine's Million Dollar Ballroom. It hosted the first show of Buddy Holly's doomed Winter Dance Party Tour. Anyone? -Freekee (talk) 04:48, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The National Register of Historic Places has it listed as "Eagles Club".  When I saw Siouxsie and the Banshees play there in 1991, it was called "Central Park Ballroom".  I can't find an RS for it, but if someone else can this should be in the proposed history section. Robman94 (talk) 14:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Therese of Saxe-Hildburghausen

message: Did she had to convert to Catholicism from Protestanism when she married? Most of the Ernestine duchies were Lutheran unless she was raised as a Catholic from birth which I highly doubt seeing both her parents were from family that had more association with Protestanism than Catholicism.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 20:51, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: She remained a Protestant her entire life. Noel S McFerran (talk) 12:42, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion 

message: — Assignment last updated by Nothinbutsierra (talk) 01:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Media and Gender
Talk:CONvergence

message: John Kovalic didn't like the picture we had of him in his article.  I gather that he is OK with a picture - he just didn't like the one we had.  Does anyone have a nice-looking picture of him that you could put in PD for his article?  Thanks.--Appraiser 12:16, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request

message: I'm not sure how to add this to the article since I can't cite a source, but my understanding is that the 6000+ attendance stopped happening during COVID. Thus the lower number in the 3000s lately. 2601:441:4900:A6E0:514C:526A:E03D:A3EF (talk) 00:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attendance clarification
Talk:DART First State

message: Does a viable transport connection exist between DART and MARC, as it does between SEPTA and DART?  i.e. Is it possible to take nothing but local trains from, say, Philadelphia to Washington DC? 165.123.215.154 (talk) 17:18, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Put simply no, the furthest south that SEPTA runs is Newark and the furthest north that MARC runs is Perryville, which leaves about a 20 mile or so gap, and the closest a bus would get you would be the DART rte 65 which runs from Newark to Elkton which is several miles north of Perryville. However their has been some discussion of extending MARC service into Delaware, i seriously doubt that extension would be coming any time in the near future. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 01:40, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:BCN Main Line map

message: There are a lot of locks at the top of this map; could they be "collapsed" thus: Andy Mabbett 18:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Large numbers of locks do waste space. I have been pondering on a symbol like this for a while. Some maps show it. Oosoom Talk to me 22:02, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Either suits me. Andy Mabbett 22:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Locks
Talk:Wonderbra Women

message: Um, according to her article, she would have been at the most 14 in 1994...somethings not right. - MSTCrow 18:44, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  While the Wonderbra Women campaign started in 1994, most of the spokesmodels came in later years.  Eva Herzigová was the original model in 1994. Mattnad 16:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Maja Latinović]] 

message: I don't think this list warrants its own article. I suggested the merger with the main wonderbra article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brendanmccabe (talk • contribs) 16:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Way back when the Wonderbra article was being edited for Feature Article status, there was a call to cut this out completely as trivial.  Instead of doing completely excising this from Wikipedia, this article was create.  I'd sooner argue for the deleting this content than adding it to a featured article.Mattnad (talk) 12:46, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger with main article 

message: Googling with the campaign's name and clicking the first result gives an article which has the year 1996 for it. 82.141.125.215 (talk) 03:07, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sophie Anderton