Talk:Gekkeiju Online

message: Every effort has been made with this article but th latest set of criticism from Wikipedia staff has persuaded me to delete it.
Notability. This subject is notable for its cultural significance. 
References. References are simply not available at this time. 
Written like an advertisment. Every effort has been made to avoid this, including reading other articles on specific source topics. Your claim that it is an advertisment is subjective.
Quality Standards. Not only is this subjective, it is also wrong. However, I see little point in pursuing the matter.
The article has been removed. If you want to have a reference to Gekkeiju Online in Wikipedia, then please find someone else to write it. Otherwise, may I suggest you continue with the unofficial censorship, which Wikipedia is becoming infamous for, of deleting information with some of the Wikipedia staff don't find personally interesting.  surfingus (talk) 23:19, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: The internet has created a number of significant possibilities for profound social change in our society and world society. With the interactions of people, from different parts of the world, the potential is enormous.
A significant part of the internet culture is online gaming. 
It is difficult to include references to the descriptions of these games other than referring people to the game itself. But claims are open to disagreement by other Wikipedia contributors. That is, after all, the strength of Wikipedia.
Moreover, the nature of these games, relying upon current technology, means they won't continue indefinitely.
It would be a tragedy to exclude or limit records of these games. I suggest it would rank alongside the destruction of so many recording archives from the 1950s and 1960s by the BBC and others. 
Imagine if the early recordings of a little four man combo from Liverpool, made in the early 60s, were thrown away because they didn't meet some criteria designed for different types of subjects or because no-one could find any references to some obscure teenager called Paul McCartney.
May I therfore, strongly urge the Editors of Wikipedia to think very carefully about how they manage cultural records such as these?
I will be happy to expand the descriptions of this article and possibly include some still images if this is requested. surfingus (talk) 18:54, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural Significance, notability and references 

message: Gekkeiju Online now back online. Proposed rewrite of the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Surfingus (talk • contribs) 15:20, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-write

message: "The game brings forth features from MUDs that have never been seen in graphical MMORPGs."
It would propably be good to give some examples for this claim... --87.234.143.16 20:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MUD-Features? 

message: It says there are nine races, but only 5 seem to be selectable in the game. Why is that? Do you have to unlock them? The reason why should be mentioned in the article.
  (There have been nine selectable for years now.  Previously, only a subset of the races were available at each reincarnation location.  Currently, each reincarnation locations has each race available.)
Also, this article gives no mention to the highly 'aggressive' writing in the game, which sets it apart from other MMORPGs. It seems to be written by and for MMORPG gamers. Has anyone thought about that? --67.172.13.176 (talk) 22:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with the article

message: What exactly is the purpose of this current effort?
You launched a number of silly attacks on my compehensive contribution.
I removed these at your suggestion only to find you have put in this incomprehensible nonsense.
Is this some sort of joke?
surfingus (talk) 09:57, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  current effort 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gekkeiju Online. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090918101953/http://www.tentonhammer.com:80/taxonomy/term/736 to http://www.tentonhammer.com/taxonomy/term/736
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified