lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ondol

message: Merging this article to 'Underfloor heating' is not appropriate in view that modern-day archaeological finds indicate the Brozne Age type of Ondol has been found in the ancient 'excavated dwelling'. Another reason: Ondol is both for cooking and heating, while 'underfloor heating' is a modern architectural concept of home heating methods.Chmyr (talk) 22:06, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:No Kum-sok

message: See WP:COMMONNAME.
Google ngrams not very useful (there is name collision with Ken Rowe)
Google books:
* No Kum-sok: 2,920 results
* No Geum-seok: 2
* No Kumsok: 46
* No Geumseok: 0
* Ken Rowe: 3,330 (but clearly a lot of collisions; even if the collisions are removed and it's more than the others, maybe shouldn't use this because of confusion over collisions)
* Kenneth Rowe: 6,320 (Also a lot of collisions)
* Kenneth H. Rowe: 297 (mostly no collisions)
* Okamura Kyoshi: 9
No Kum-sok winner imo toobigtokale (talk) 18:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Also this article is well-written, good work ☺️ toobigtokale (talk) 18:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Category talk:Fictional writers

message: Should Carlotta Francis be included on the list? She was mentioned in an episode of Law and Order, as a writer of famous vampire novels. After the episode, a lot of people have searched the net for information about her. 84.210.11.229 (talk) 08:38, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this is a category that list actual articles rater than an exhaustive list of fictional writers I'd say no. Beeing mentioned in passing in one episode would probably not make her notable enough to have her own Wikipedia article, most minor characters that appear on screen don't even get their own article. --Sherool (talk) 15:45, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This belongs in the List of fictional books from non-print media. I'll add it to the TV Series section. Roland (talk) 18:34, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Carlotta Francis

message: Is it really necessary to have an entire additional page for the last entry under Z? Can't it be squeezed in on the end of the first page? 66.91.36.8 (talk) 11:19, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Page
Talk:List of members of the Commonwealth of Nations by name

message: Hong Kong was never a Commonwealth member.  It was a Crown Colony from 1842 until 1997, and went straight to being a Special Administrative Region of the PRC.  Members of the Commonwealth must be independent (see the previous, incorrect, inclusion of the Federation of the West Indies).  In terms of members, this list is up-to-date, as of February 2006. Bastin8 15:11, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hong Kong 

message: Are the seperate parts of the United Kingdom members of the Commonwealth directly rather than as party of the United Kingdom?  Hence competing seperatly at the Commonwealth Games?--62.6.139.11 16:07, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  They're not countries, so they can't be members of the Commonwealth.  The Home Nations compete separately at the Commonwealth Games because the original incarnation of the current Games, the British Empire Games, was not a competition between different countries, but between parts of the British Empire, some of which had no autonomy whatsoever.  That's why Home Nations, Crown Colonies, Crown Dependencies, Malay sultanates, and the like were (and are, with the exception of the last one) allowed to compete separately. Bastin8 18:00, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Furthermore countries such Norfolk Island aren't directly commonwealth members but participate in the Commonwealth Games through their relationship with a Commonwealth countries. In the case of the Norfolk Island, it is a self-governing territory of Australia. Ben Arnold 23:29, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  United Kingdom 

message: Can anyone answer this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.71.191.177 (talk • contribs) 21:16, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  Only countries can be members of the Commonwealth of Nations, as dictated by the Edinburgh Declaration. Bastin 13:00, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is England considered one of the Commonwealth Nations? 

message: Just a thought: These 13 colonies (instigators of the unpleasantries of 1776) were self-declared independent well before the Commonwealth was formed. Is it relevant to include them in a list of "countries which didn't become members upon independence"? Otherwise we may as well include Normandy etc. I propose removal. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.86.138.193 (talk) 22:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  13 colonies in The Americas
Wikipedia talk:Articles that are more comprehensive than on Encyclopædia Britannica

message: There are many non-featured articles which are better than those in Britannica and they will be in a majority among such articles for years, probably decades, to come. This page is almost dead, but maybe it wouldn't be if it was less restrictive.
Anyway, I came here to add Race and intelligence. Britannica only has a subsection five paragraphs long. The first three are not strictly on topic, and simply provide preparatory material for the predictable argument in the final two paragraphs that the topic does not merit discussion. There is no reference to recent (post 1930s) research or debate and the section is also highly U.S. centric. Hawkestone 21:33, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Restricting this to featured articles is inappropriate
Talk:New Age travellers

message: In the opening paragraph, it says the movement "largely originated in 1980s and early 1990s Britain". In the "Background" section, it says "originated in the free festivals of the 1970s". In the "Contemporary British Travelling Scene" section, it says New Age travellers have "taken to the road since the 1960s". Only the second claim (the 1970s) is sourced. In the discussion elsewhere on this Talk Page, I see many people saying that the scene "peaked" in the late '80s and early '90s, suggesting that it must have started earlier, making me especially suspicious of the claim in the opening paragraph. So, unless anyone has a source saying otherwise, I'll make it so they all refer to the movement as starting in the 1970s. --Static Sleepstorm (talk) 06:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictions in article – when did this phenomenon begin?
Talk:Railroad buff

message: It seems to me that since this article mentions that the terms "railroad buff" and "railfan" are virtually interchangeable, the article itself uses both, and that since railfan has this information and more, this article should be merged into railfan.  Thoughts? slambo June 30, 2005 12:52 (UTC)
:That makes perfect sense to me, go for it. Thryduulf 14:37, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into [[Railfan]]
Talk:Rabite

message: Some people may consider King Rabites to be coloured white. On the screen I used to play Seiken Densetsu 3, however, I picked up a bit of a lilac hue in the shading. Therefore, I've termed them as being lilac rather than pure white. If the general consensus is that they're definitely white, though, feel free to make it known here before it gets changed. -LichYoshi 16:27, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You should provide an emulator screenshot, so that the color can be determined. Note though that the game changes the palette in daylight scenes. 84.182.93.154 19:40, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: King Rabites

message: How do you say "Rabite", as in "bite" or in "rabbit"? 200.163.195.165 21:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure of the proper pronunciation, but I figure it's "bite" since that's what they're eluding to in the name. -LichYoshi 13:21, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronounciation

message: I think the mere existence of the Biology section is an example of some people having far too much free time.
Come on folks. It's a small yellow 2D cartoon blob, named from a mistransliteration of a misunderstood english word. It doesn't HAVE biology. Jeez. ---anonymous gamer. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.36.128.25 (talk • contribs) .
:Apparently you also have enough free time to read the article and comment on it. ;) 84.182.93.154 19:45, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biology
Talk:Hailie Jade

message: I've heard that, in order to make this track, Hallie's parts were prerecorded and mixed with her father's parts, and that she wasn't allowed to hear the completed song.  (I would imagine child welfare groups watch Mr. Mathers like a hawk for a chance to take her away from him, since they doubtless consider him a bad influence).  Has Eminem ever made a statement on how this track was made?  I really doubt she was in the booth with him while he was rapping about stapling labia to his face or whatever.  :P  -Kasreyn 21:58, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vocal work on "My Dad's Gone Crazy"
Talk:Marshall Jevons

message: This article is in both :Category:Fictional writers and :Category:Pseudonyms, I feel this is misleading and redundant. Even if the pseudonym has a fictional backstory, it should be more than sufficient to put them in :Category:Pseudonyms, unless the name is also used for a character that acualy appear in a work of fiction and is also a writer, in wich case the double categorisation would be apropriate. Please post any comments to Category talk:Fictional writers so we don't have to repeat ourselves over multiple article's talk pages (I will post this wherever I find such double categorised articles). --Sherool 30 June 2005 14:18 (UTC)
:Removed. 65.28.237.180 16:02, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Giovanni Battista Doni

message: I have taken this almost verbatim from Groves (1922) where it says On returning to Florence in 1622, he entered the service of Cardinal Barberini, and went with him to Rome where he became secretary to the College of Carinals, afterwards accompanying the cardinal to Paris, Madrid, and back to Rome.
Now the only Barberinis that I can identify  are:
*Antonio (Marcello) Cardinal Barberini (Sr.), O.F.M. Cap - only elevated to cardinal in 1624
*Francesco Cardinal Barberini, Jr. - only elevated to cardinal in 1690
*Benedetto Cardinal Colonna Barberini di Sciarra - born 1788
*Antonio Cardinal Barberini (Jr.) - only elevated to cardinal in 1627
*Maffeo Barberini - becam Pope in 1623.
Now, none of these fit. I suspect that there is an error in Grove but can anyone help? Cutler June 30, 2005 14:28 (UTC)
:Looking at the article Dean of the College of Cardinals, there were two Francesco Barberinis:
:*Francesco Barberini, seniore (1597-1679) Dean (1623, 1666); and
:*Francesco Barberini, juniore (1662-1738) Dean (1690, 1726).
:The latter looks like the famous cardinal, the former Doni's boss. Cutler 11:35, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Baberini problem
Talk:Barberini family

message: I have just started Giovanni Doni which I have based on a 1922 edition of Grove's Dictionary of Music and Musicians  where it says On returning to Florence in 1622, he entered the service of Cardinal Barberini, and went with him to Rome where he became secretary to the College of Carinals, afterwards accompanying the cardinal to Paris, Madrid, and back to Rome.
Now the only Cardinal Barberinis that I can identify  are:
*Antonio (Marcello) Cardinal Barberini (Sr.), O.F.M. Cap - only elevated to cardinal in 1624
*Francesco Cardinal Barberini, Jr. - only elevated to cardinal in 1690
*Benedetto Cardinal Colonna Barberini di Sciarra - born 1788
*Antonio Cardinal Barberini (Jr.) - only elevated to cardinal in 1627
*Maffeo Barberini - became Pope in 1623.
Now, none of these fit. I suspect that there is an error in Grove but can anyone help? Cutler June 30, 2005 14:31 (UTC)
::It's been a while since you posted ^ this ^ note ^ but I thought I'd try and answer you query. There were a number of Barberini cardinals (most have Wiki pages now), many of them made cardinal by their relative (in various forms) Maffeo Barberini as Pope Urban VIII. 
::That Cardinal Benedetto was cardinal more than 100 years later so he's off the list. 
::The others became cardinal under Urban VIII but Maffeo himself would have been a cardinal in 1622 before becoming Pope the following year. It is likely he is the cardinal in question. 
::It may be that Doni went to Rome with Maffeo (who then became Pope) but ended up working for Francesco (who became Dean of the College of Cardinals). I'm not sure the records would make the distinction between one Cardinal Barberini and another.
::Hope this helps. Stalwart111 (talk) 03:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Identifying Cardinal Barberini
Talk:Statute of Kalisz

message: Consider moving text of orginal and translation to Wikisource. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 30 June 2005 14:32 (UTC)
*You are right... I will move the English translation of the full text to Wikisource. --Ttyre 1 July 2005 15:16 (UTC)
The first part of the text had no references at all. It claimed "Jewish Supremacism" in Poland. This is a highly controversial Theory of David Duke, former Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.220.132.179 (talk) 15:27, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikisource 

message: *1.)  The source of the translation of the text is unclear.  
*2.)  The Whereabouts of this document over the past millennium and presently is unclear.  We need ot have a history of where it was physically created, kept, and in what archive it now resided.  Or, it it was lost in a war, fire or similar, we need to know when and what authenticated copies of the original exist or existed long enough to be reliably authenticated and copied.
*3.) Context and impact of this decree.  Article needs good historical sources on why it was written and what impact it had.
:*3.1) A section on the Statue's repuutation and public profile in the modern period would be interesting, since it is lcear that this document had become a thing by the 1920s, and perhaps earlier.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:29, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing problems

message: There is no doubt about notablity.  The creation of a notable work of political art based on this document establishes that even if it turns out that the Statues are a myth. And if it is a myth, it is an extremely notable one.  Probably just needs sourcing.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:33, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: In the section Accusations of forgery, references are given to scholarly sources asserting that the statute is fake. But the lede and all the text up to that point presents it as real. So, which claim is true? Even if there is a significant proportion of scholars who consider it authentic, I'd expect the lede to at least mention that its authenticity is controversial. 87.126.21.225 (talk) 21:43, 16 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There are accusations that the original document that the kings of Poland for several centuries swore on is just a forgery. But its historical status and force is not fake. Galehautt (talk) 09:31, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  So, is it real?
Talk:Jessie Pope

message: In 1930, at age 60, she married a retired bank manager named Edward Lenton, and died in Devon in 1941.
Still unsourced after a year. I vaguely remember there being some unreliable (i.e. forum) citation for this, but I can't find anything now. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 02:22, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced / marriage 
Talk:Acquittal

message: I searched for "not guilty" hoping to read about the beatles song by that title. I was redirected here. Maybe something should be done so that "not guilty" has a disambiguation page which links to both the song and this article. Hugzz 02:27, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay I did it. Feel free to hit me up on my talk page if you have anything to say about it, since i'm still somewhat new to this --Hugzz 09:13, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beatles Song (not guilty) 

message: Is there any word 'clean chit' related to acquittal. In India it is a common word used for relieve from a charge of fault or crime. Anyone has any idea about it? --Avinesh Jose   T   05:20, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  clean chit 

message: This only refers to the decision made; is there an article regarding the fact that "not guilty" can be entered as a plea, or should it be mentioned on this article? ProfessorTofty (talk) 08:54, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plea
Talk:Rubber stamp

message: Using stamps to put a seal on important documents to render them specific authentication or endorsement or categorize a particular paper has been in existence for quite some time. These stamps need an inkpad to be pressed on them to gather ink on it before putting the seal on the paper where it is needed. Of late, pre inked stamps have replaced the two piece set of stamp and inkpad and they have become widely popular for their neatness and superior print quality. These stamps can be used on any surface and being water resistant they can make identification better on all personal items, industrial equipment and photography etc. 
Pre Inked Stamps for Business Use
As these stamps have ink in them, there is no need for separate ink pads. These stamps always leave a crisp and perfect impression whenever they are used. The rubber die attached to the stamp carries a specific quantity of ink in it, and whenever it is pressed against the surface where it is needed to be used, the ink oozes out leaving the required impression. Commonly used stamps like A/c payee only, season’s greetings, thank you for your payment and please visit again etc. help create a favorable impression on the customers, and they also help reduce manual work. These stamps are available in different sizes depending on the requirement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mannsurjit (talk • contribs) 08:52, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre Inked Stamps for Business Use 

message: I tried to look up the term here, and found nothing worthwhile. To a non native speaker this term is not obvious in any way. Where would be a good place to have that explained? --92.227.138.59 (talk) 07:18, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubber stamp court 

message: — Assignment last updated by EMEEdits (talk) 19:31, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Engl 221 Introduction to Technical and Professional Communication

message: Prior to editing this section, it was flagged for containing weasel words: vague phrases that are associated with bias or unverifiable information. I sifted through and removed these weasel words as well as added peer reviewed citations. By clarifying these statements, this section is no longer flagged and therefore has enhanced credibility and usability. Efl4ora (talk) 19:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  As an art form
Talk:The X-Files season 3

message: Any of you guys know a site with all the writers, producers ect. of these episodes. If you'll don't all I have to say is dvd's and laptop lol! --Mulder talk 18:03, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also I'd like to add different photos for every episode --Mahogany 17:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Try .  Acegikmo1 18:28, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool but now everythings under control b/c of a website I found thanks anyway --Mahogany 18:29, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slight Drawback 

message: Avatar, about the attempt to frame Assistant Director Skinner for murder, is not a "monster of the week" episode. It is broadly part of the series story arc involving the Syndicate, and their machinations. They had already tried to murder Skinner in a previous story arc episode. This was their second attempt to silence him and get him out of the way of their plans. They did not want the murder of Melissa Scully investigated. As was stated in the episode, a second murder attempt would have drawn too much attention to the members of the Syndicate. That's why the frame up job was set in motion. The only X-files type element was the Old Woman, who in the end was evidently helping Skinner. All of the events relate to previous story arc events, and main story arc characters appear in the episode. — Parsa (talk) 01:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avatar and the series story arc 

message: I don't understand why my edits are being reverted like that. They are not "screwed up and wrong". The source is USA Today, the same source for seasons 1 and 2 ratings. 
MiguelPortugal (talk) 01:38, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings references
Talk:Robin Hayes

message: "For other people named Robert Hayes, see Robert Hayes (disambiguation)." should NOT be on this page for ROBIN Hayes.  Robin and Robert are two different names.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueIris2 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation notation is incorrect
Talk:Lie–Kolchin theorem

message: I added a link to above, but maybe this was not a good idea, as maybe it confuses the issue. (Its confusing me right now). Revert if you want to. linas 30 June 2005 14:54 (UTC)
Are there any theorems about the eigenvectors of Borel subgroups? Seems to me that as long as all the diagonal elements are 1, then the eigenspace is one dimensional; or more generally, if there are p 1's on the diagonal of an n by n matrix, then the eigenspace is n-p+1 dimensional, or so it seems, for real/complex matrices; but is it true? linas 30 June 2005 15:13 (UTC)
: Dear Linas, good question about "multiplicity one". To give first a positive result: if the representation of the Borel subgroup B(in a semi-simple of more generally reductive linear algebraic group G over an algebraically closed field) comes from an irreducible representation of the bigger algebraic group G then the common eigenspace of B is in fact one-dimensional. This plays an important role in the classification of irreducible representations of semi-simple or reductive algebraic groups (like GL(n,C), Sp(2n,C), SO(n,C) and the exceptional series), in fact the definition of the highest weight vector of a finite-dimensional rep is based upon this fact. In general, for a general solvable and connected algebraic group G, a necessary condition (for uniqueness of common eigenvector) is that the representation is indecomposable (i.e. does not decompose into a direct sum of two sub-representations). Beyond that not much can be said about the one-dimensional subrepresentations. For example, take in the three-dimensional Heisenberg group over the complex numbers C (upper-triangular 3 × 3 matrices with one's on the diagonal ) the subgroup G of matrices where the upper 2 × 2 block is the identity matrix. This is a three-dimensional rep of a two-dimensional algebraic group isomorphic to C^2 (the two elements in the last columns add componentwise upon multiplication). The space of fixed vectors has dimension 2. On the other hand the representation is in fact indecomposable. The general rule maybe is (?): the more "degenerate" (i.e. closer to abelian) the solvable group G is the "bigger" is the space of common eigenvectors resp. one-dimensional subrepresentations in an indecomposable repr of G (please dont't take that as a precise mathematical statement...).
--212.18.24.11 12:32, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Perron-Frobenius theorem]]

message: Kolchin's theorem redirects to this article.  Kaplansky,Fields and Rings (1972) states it in the form:
:Let S be a multiplicative semigroup of unipotent matrices.  The elements of S can be simultaneously triangularised.
The same formulation is used by Herstein (1986) , where it is deduced from a theorem of Wedderburn, that a finite dimensional algebra over a field having a basis of nilpotent elements is nilpotent. 
In addition, this form of the theorem does not require the fielkd to  be algebraically closed, which is an assumption throughout this article.  So, does this form merit a separate section, or  its own article?  Deltahedron (talk) 20:06, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kolchin's theorem