Talk:Australian Army Aviation

message: A nice start, but what makes this topic notable? Rather than saying it's "a corps of the Australian Army," it might be better to say "a corps of the Australian Army which...." LordAmeth 17:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMILHIST Assessment

message: The FSP is not specific to the Army, but is shared by the services. It is only after you receive an offer from a service after completing the FSP that you are assigned to a specific service - till that point you are a general candidate.
additionally, I feel there is a definite bias in the article, especially the training section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.123.110.206 (talk) 13:20, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Flight Screening Program

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Australian Army Aviation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060823012234/http://www.fourays.org:80/history/history_index.htm to http://www.fourays.org/history/history_index.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071211200801/http://www.defence.gov.au/minister/Hilltpl.cfm?CurrentId=4446 to http://www.defence.gov.au/minister/Hilltpl.cfm?CurrentId=4446
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060825183830/http://defencejobs.gov.au/default.asp?p=830 to http://www.defencejobs.gov.au/default.asp?p=830
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060823064736/http://www.defencejobs.gov.au/default.asp?p=831 to http://www.defencejobs.gov.au/default.asp?p=831
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:02, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Australian Army Aviation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211151820/http://www.dsto.defence.gov.au/news/3841/ to http://www.dsto.defence.gov.au/news/3841/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161008154311/http://www.army.gov.au/~/media/Files/Our%20work/Community%20engagement/2015_02_AHQ_ArmyAviation_Factsheet.pdf to http://www.army.gov.au/~/media/Files/Our%20work/Community%20engagement/2015_02_AHQ_ArmyAviation_Factsheet.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Australian Army Aviation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110317081759/http://www.defence.gov.au/news/armynews/editions/1227/1227.pdf to http://www.defence.gov.au/news/armynews/editions/1227/1227.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110322045539/http://www.defence.gov.au/news/armynews/editions/1105/topstories/story01.htm to http://www.defence.gov.au/news/armynews/editions/1105/topstories/story01.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article is in need of substantial cleanup. The FSP section is out of date, there are references to the future HATS, but HATS is currently in operation. The article is written in a biased view and could do with substantial cleanup to meet the quality standard required. Xfyre99 (talk) 11:27, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, thanks for your work on this article. Yes, I agree the training section needs work and your proposal makes sense. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:46, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks AR, my pleasure. I also appreciate you keeping an eye on my edits and picking up mistakes. I'll make these changes in the coming days. Xfyre99 (talk) 11:16, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

text: Work completed on the training section 11:58, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup