lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:French battleship Justice

message: B-class. The article stated there were 10 guns in the 194 mm battery, but the infobox read 18. I changed this to 10, since the line drawing seems to show only 10 secondary guns. All 4 Liberté's have this typo; I will let you fix the other 3. I also added (7.6 in) because I have no clue as to what 194 mm means. The infobox does not list the tertiary armament. Djmaschek (talk) 03:29, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: Here. Parsecboy (talk) 20:37, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Aviodrome

message: De Uiver is not lost - it had to make an emergency landing at night in Albury, NSW, Australia enroute from Sydney to Melbourne.  Local residents, alerted by the radio, turned out to illuminate the runway with their car headlights as there were no airport lights at that time.  Having won the race to deliver the first mail to Melbourne, De Uiver was eventually flown back to Albury, where it is mounted on a staunchion at the airport entrance.
There is a pub called "De Uiver" at Zaventem in Brussels, dedicated to the memory of the aircraft and bedecked with many mementos of its flights.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.107.217.17 (talk) 20:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:IMSLP2

message: See: http://imslp.org/ ...agree with the cease and desist, and take down the entire site.
I suspect this template -and Template:IMSLP- is now obsolete? As are thousands of links in Wikipedia articles? Michael Bednarek 06:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: IMSLP No More

message: I would like to make this template not display anything on the article for now.  In other words, make the output of the template entirely commented out.  I'm sympathetic that if IMSLP goes back on-line we don't want to have to put all these templates back.  On the other hand, it doesn't help our readers much at all to know that there used to be a copy of a work available but there isn't any more.  Comments?  -- Myke Cuthbert (talk) 22:23, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree --Dr. Friendly (talk) 08:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment out output?

message: As IMSLP is now back online, could someone with the know-how update the template to link to the appropriate IMSLP page? Cheers --Bobnotts talk 12:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMSLP back up... 

message: It is  unconditionally free in Canada, but not eg in  US. See eg http://imslp.org/wiki/Petite_Suite_for_Piano,_Sz.105_%28Bart%C3%B3k,_B%C3%A9la%29 
So I changed the template text accordingly. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:10, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The notice at IMSLP you quote refers not only to the difference in the treatment of copyright in the US and Canada, but more generally to "life+70" vs "life+50". While the previous wording was overly inclusive ("Free scores"), your version is overly restrictive ("free according to the copyright law of Canada"). Repeating the IMSLP notice in full in this template is impractical; it's also unnecessary because the interested reader will find it there. There are many restrictions in various countries about accessing material on the internet; it's not necessary for Wikipedia to present warnings in every instance. I suggest to use the neutral term "<work>: Scores at …". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 04:30, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not exactly free
Talk:Murray–Darling Cap

message: Sorry this is so short but I dont have time to extend it  (exam time) maybe some other time the document I have listed on the page should contain a wealth of information on the cap for anyone who has the time and inclination to extend this article, Good luck Clarkeo 06:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comment
Template talk:England national football team managers

message: stop putting 2007 as he doesn't start until January 2008, check the statement on the F.A. website. Skitzo (talk) 23:28, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capello's start date 

message: Capello was removed, added back on. "Following his appointment as England manager..." CorleoneSerpicoMontana (talk) 23:35, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: removal

message: Please can I politely request that the continual edit-warring over Capello's start date now ceases. The problem appears to be caused by the unusual event of his being appointed in a different year to his starting work. Correct me if I'm wrong here, but it appears that all are agreed that he was appointed in 2007 and is due to start work in 2008, however you can't agree on whether date of appointment or date of starting work should be used. I can't think of a precedent for this off-hand so I think you should discuss it at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football#Fabio_Capello. Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 01:08, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polite request for cessation of hostilities 

message: You know how "England nation football team" links to the article? What does everyone think of getting "Managers" to link to England national football team managers? Good idea, bad idea? faithless (speak) 10:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, as there's already a parameter for this. I've added the link accordingly. --Jameboy (talk) 12:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link?
Talk:Takashi Kawamura (politician)

message: This source (the first citation on this page) when translated to English calls Takashi Kawamura the Conservative Party of Japan's Co-Chairman. Per WP:SYNTH we go with what sources explicitly state. Helper201 (talk) 16:08, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: What source are you referring to? The yahoo page gives an error. Do you have an archived link? Anime King (talk) 17:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  sorry about that. Here it is -  - it’s the first citation on this page. Helper201 (talk) 11:46, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The phrase 共同代表 is used in other Japanese parties such as Ishin, with 共同代表 also being used in their respective Japanese wikipedia page. However, on english wikipedia, Hirofumi Yoshimura, Ishin's 共同代表 is labeled as 'Deputy leader,' so I'm guessing there is some sort of difference from other democracies where in Japan, a "co-leader" doesn't necessarily mean an equal to the party leader, but more of their deputy. This explanation holds some weight when all of the Conservative Party's posters, images and advertisements (also their X account profile picture) primarily show Naoki Hyakuta (and sometimes their co-founder Kaori Arimoto) only, and not with Kawamura despite being the "co-leader." Anime King (talk) 18:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Co-chariman v deputy leader
Talk:Arizona State University Research Park

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://asurp.com/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  BubbleEngineer (talk) 20:16, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Brisbane Football Club (1866–1887)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved to "Brisbane Football Club (1866–1887)" per discussion below. If we had moved it to "Brisbane Football Club (1866)", we wouldn't have achieved much, as it would have been still ambiguous - giving impression it is still active, same goes for "founded" title.   —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 13:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Brisbane Football Club (defunct) → ? – The (defunct) disambiguator is generally not very useful, and more precise disambiguation can probably be had. Would Brisbane Football Club (1866) or Brisbane Football Club (1866–1887) make a better title? It appears there is some disagreement as to when the club folded, so I'm unsure if a full year–year disambiguator is appropriate. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 6 November 2021
Talk:Mare

message: I get the following error: "Edit not allowed: Site link eswiki:Equus ferus caballus already used by item Q726." This of course because the "Ygua" (Mare) article is simply a link to the main "Horse" article, but still, shouldnt this article be able to somehow link there too? The correct Spanish link is http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yegua
Anyone knows how to correct?
:No clue, but I know there is some wikimedia-wide project to consolidate interwiki links in one place.  See User:Addbot which seems to be migrating a lot of them, maybe the bot's owner can figure it out.  Montanabw(talk) 02:37, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I cant add the Spanish / Español link to wiki
Talk:Hopton-on-Sea

message: Deleted vandalism.
Also the article could do with looking at. Chevin (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs improvement

message: Hanging everything on the Daily Mail Article is a mistake as it seems to have a few factual errors - Goodnight Campers by Hardy and Ward says it was £950 potter used to open his first camp (though I can't see the previous page so it's possible the other £450 came from another source) and Hopton was his second camp after Hemsby  and England's Seaside Resorts by Brodie and Winter says his first was at Caister . Though Brodie and Winter may be getting mixed up with J. Fletcher Dodd's camp in that village (at the article Holiday camp, I've gone with Hardy and Ward.) I suspect there will be better sources available in the local area that I can't find online. Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holiday Camp
Talk:KFLT-FM

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class becuase it uses the Category:Arizona stub on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the  above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article. SkiersBot (talk) 06:32, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub assessment
Talk:Retlaw Enterprises

message: This second sentence doesn't quite make sense, but I'm not sure how to fix it:
:"Retlaw Broadcasting acquired KIMA-TV and its two semi-satellite stations, KLEW-TV and KEPR-TV, for $17 million in October 1986. The six stations owned in 1990 had purchased, over the years, for $37 million, and were estimated then to be worth $100 million."
– AndyFielding (talk) 11:43, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo, but what?
Talk:Ladimir Kwiatkowski

message: I just wanted to thank you guys for putting this article on Ladmo, an Arizona legend, up on Wikipedia!  Ah, childhood memories! 86.29.234.224 (talk) 21:50, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 2008 Comment
Talk:Italian Co-belligerent Army

message: The article says "On the whole the Italian Co-Belligerent Army made up 1/8 of the fighting force and 1/4 of the entire force of 15th Army Group of the Allied Forces". I don't get this. Six Combat Groups @ a stated establishment of say 9,000 men makes 54,000. The official British history gives 8th Army fighting strength for the final offensive as 633,000, 5th Army as 267,000 and the total strength of 15th Army Group as 1,334,000 including Lines of Communication troops. (See the Spring 1945 offensive in Italy article for this info + references). I'm afraid I don't have access to the Italian language citation given in the Italian Co-Belligerent Army article (Fatutta) but something isn't adding up here. Stephen Kirrage talk - contribs 23:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proportion of the 15th Army Group 

message: Trucks loaded with Italian soldiers of the Co-Belligerent Army pass signs on youtube but link cant be added.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Man74 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film of Italian Co-belligerent soldiers
Talk:Operation Paget

message: I have raised a discussion at Talk:Death of Diana, Princess of Wales about where we should go with these articles. --John 06:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is anything known about why the operation was named Paget? Not seeing anything on that in the article is sort of weird, isn't it? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 23:18, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 

message: Re. the "Conclusion of Criminal Investigation Report" section: What does this sentence mean?: "Angela Gallop's analysis of Diana's stomach content proved to Operation Paget that Diana was not pregnant when she died." How does an analysis of "stomach contents" pertain to the matter of ascertaining whether the decedent was pregnant or not? 107.147.183.77 (talk) 07:01, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Say what?
Talk:State Bar of Arizona

message: No cumplió con el contrato acordado 2607:FB91:8E8A:4B0A:2C1A:A1A1:6A5F:1D83 (talk) 23:55, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queja hacia mi abogado  

message: No cumplió con el contrato 2607:FB91:8E8A:4B0A:2C1A:A1A1:6A5F:1D83 (talk) 23:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queja hacia mi abogado  

message: No cumplió con el 2607:FB91:8E8A:4B0A:2C1A:A1A1:6A5F:1D83 (talk) 23:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queja hacia mi abogado  

message: No cumplió con el 2607:FB91:8E8A:4B0A:2C1A:A1A1:6A5F:1D83 (talk) 23:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queja hacia mi abogado  

message: No cumplió con el contrato 2607:FB91:8E8A:4B0A:2C1A:A1A1:6A5F:1D83 (talk) 23:57, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queja hacia mi abogado
Talk:Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers

message: Initially, the Presidential Award increased the amount of grant money received by the recipient.  However, during George W. Bush's tenure as president, this feature was phased out and no longer exists; the award is now simply an honor bestowed upon the recipients.
Can anyone confirm this and, if so, add to page?
129.116.140.102 (talk) 17:07, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Award amount

message: The NIH archive (https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/pecase_archive.htm) is missing one person (Jay R. Hove). What's up with that? Thatsme314 (talk) 16:56, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 Awardees 

message: The material from the Presidential Faculty Fellowship (PFF) sections at Presidential Young Investigator Award probably fits better here than there. Maybe we should move the material to this article? Thatsme314 (talk) 10:23, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Presidential Faculty Fellowship (PFF)
Talk:Keiro Kitagami

message: Good afternoon - 
I am trying to get in contact with Keiro Kitagami. I am an old school friend who grew up with Keiro in Buena Park, California. If you know how to get in contact with him, I would appreciate it. Thank you.
Brian  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.78.179.91 (talk) 21:38, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:TriWest Healthcare Alliance

message: Flagged for a non neutral point of view as a good portion of the article is written in defense of the company's actions. All the linked sources are press releases from the company that is the subject of this article. WildElf (talk) 20:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: NPOV template removed as it is 16 months old.  – S. Rich (talk) 15:35, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Bias
Talk:Arizona State Prison Phoenix-West

message: If anyone is interested, I have proposed a new Wikiproject concerning prisons here.--Cdogsimmons (talk) 16:56, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 
Talk:Chapel of the Holy Cross (Sedona, Arizona)

message: Please explain what is controversial about the last move? This chapel is not the only one in the world with that name, and it is the accepted format in Wikipedia for institutions which share the same name. Daniel the Monk (talk) 21:51, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem was, you moved it to "Holy Cross Chapel", which isn't it's official name. I'm fine with the Sedona ID, and I see you are in process of doing a dab page for Chapel of the Holy Cross as well. Best, Pete Tillman (talk) 22:08, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Title move

message: Hello,
I have found some sources that I would like to use to add some information to this page. I am citing them below, as I am not quite ready to make modifications to the page, but want to share my intentions to do so. I am doing a research project for a class and would appreciate any feedback on my future edits!
"Drama in the Desert." Architectural Forum, December 1956, pp. 97-99.
"Chapel Crowns Arizona Eminence." Progressive Architecture, October 1956, p. 91
"Chapel of the Holy Cross." Architectural Record, October 1956, pp. 173-182.
Thanks --Sbridge4 (talk) 02:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I found some sources for adding information to this page 

message: Maybe the article should mention the controversy concerning the first version of the Christus statue created by Keith Monroe. His Christus became known as the "Christ of the Atomic Age," and it hung above the altar from 1955 until the late 1970s, when the artist, disillusioned by hateful reactions from community members who thought his depiction of Christ unsuitable, took the statue down and destroyed it. Pictures can be found here: 
 92.79.101.164 (talk) 08:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Christ of the Atomic Age' controversy
Talk:Luhrs Building

message: and am now many miles away, but unless someone speaks up, I am going to change the marble in "  elaborate marble ornamentation on the uppermost two floors " to terra cotta.  Rarely, if ever would marble be used that far away from the observer.  However . .......  I was once wrong before and  . .... Carptrash (talk) 02:47, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have not looked closely
Talk:Old Main (Arizona State University)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --McMillin24 contribstalk 18:47, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Deck Park Tunnel

message: I propose merging to Interstate 10 in Arizona. — PCB 15:02, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll support as it is today.  Needs some references, though. –Fredddie™ 00:37, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Support as well, with no prejudice against recreation if an appropriate article can be fashioned. (If references appropriately, the current article should not be merged; if merged, a lot of the content needs to be eliminated from the merger because it is unreferenced.) Imzadi 1979 →  00:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Theodore Roosevelt Dam

message: The article says "The dam was originally known as "Salt River Dam #1", it was not until 1959 that the dam and reservoir were officially named after Theodore Roosevelt."  The Chandler Arizonan from 1912 already labels it as such:
[http://archive.chandlermuseum.org/Collections/Newspaper/Chandler_Arizonan/1912/05-1912/05-21-1912/05-21-1912_-_Page_1[
Peter Flass (talk) 22:33, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 
Talk:Seiji Kihara

message: "Affiliated to the openly revisionist lobby Nippon Kaigi, which advocates a restoration of monarchy in the archipelago, Kihara was among the 225 MPs joining the 'one million people rally to protect the Imperial tradition' in March 2006."
1. What does it mean to be "affiliated" to a lobbying group in this case? Is he a member of the organization or lobbied by it? There's a member's council in parliament. Is he on it? (He is.)
2A. What does it mean to be revisionist? The link leads to "historical revisionism", but the Wikipedia page for Nippon Kaigi describes "constitutional revisionism". In this case, members primarily advocate revision to allow Japan to have a standing military. There's a weaker, secondary advocation for traditional causes: the Shinto religion, and Japanese nobility. But the Japanese Diet (even Nippon Kaigi members) seem to be strongly for separation of church and state and against expanding the Japanese royal family to include extended family.
2B. The Japanese Wikipedia page for Kihara indicates he agrees with the Murayama and Kono statements - Japan's foremost statements on WW2 history - which are not considered "revisionist".
3. The context of the rally doesn't match the implication that Kihara advocates for a more powerful monarchy. Japan has had a ceremonial monarchy since the US occupation in the 1940s. The rally was to support the possibility of a female monarch in that role. The rally was in 2005. It's 2023 now.
This is a famous politician with a long history. His Japanese Wikipedia page is quite long and well-sourced (82 sources at the moment). He's currently acting Secretary General of the LDP. All of his planks are on the record. 
He's a former model / juvenile delinquent. He studied in London. He was there for the Dhaka terrorist attack in Bangladesh. He received the Order of the Polar Star in Mongolia. 
It seems strange to me, maybe even agenda-driven, to focus 20% of this Wikipedia article on the above bit about the lobby group Nippon Kaigi. 2400:4053:4620:4B00:F968:FB08:8571:48A0 (talk) 10:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nippon Kaigi