lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Infanticide

message: This should be covered somewhere on Wikipedia wether here or somewhere else.:
A healthy society is marked by its care and prioritization of its younger generation.  Yet recent history indicates a decay in the health of humans living in advanced societies, and a general direction toward acceptance of animalistic infanticide.  In 2008, the future of an entire generation was  sacrificed to keep older wealthy Wall Street bankers from suffering economic demise.  During the 2020 coronavirus plandemic, the economic future of many young adults was sacrificed for the sake of the older ones when housing bailouts and eviction bans contributed to increases in the number of young adults unable to afford to buy homes; and when many young adults were stripped of mentoring opportunities that exist with in-person work settings in an effort to preserve the health of older adults.  Furthermore, infant children, as a result of being forced into a masked world as part of a frantic and ineffective effort to preserve the health of adults, experienced reduction in cognitive learning abilities.  Children, generally not as susceptible to the effects of the virus, experienced permanent trauma from stunted education and lack of critical social interaction during their developmental years, all due to schools being shut down to preserve the health of adults. 50.246.86.33 (talk) 12:49, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passive Infanticide In The Developed World 

message: this seems sensational at best and not at all academic. Alexander R. Burton (talk) 08:51, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reached its peak in Europe during WWII?   

message: Hi IP editor, what's your issue with the text especially in regard to Romania which you continually try to delete? It's sourced and, as far as I can see, absolutely fine. But if you think there's something wrong with it, let's discuss it here. Gawaon (talk) 09:20, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive editing regarding Romania
Talk:Autism spectrum

message: This bot, [sigmabot III], has been deleting the conversations on this talk page for no apparent reason. Can anybody please explain why? These conversations are still relevant. Krystal Kalb (talk) 01:07, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's called archiving. It's to prevent talk pages from growing too long and being filled with old conversations that have not been active within a certain threshold. The discussions are still present, you just need to look in one of the currently 19 archives listed in the banners at the top of the page. See WP:ARCHIVE for more of the technical info on why it's necessary, particularly on busy pages. Sideswipe9th (talk) 01:37, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It is currently very confusing, though, partly due to the ongoing merge process: Talk:Autism spectrum/Archive 4#Proposed outline has the main outline of what we wanted to do to the Autism spectrum page, which I believe has since become the autism page? Oolong (talk) 21:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh? 

message: I'm not sure how best to deal with the fact that when the merge finally went ahead, 'Autism' emerged as the title used for the main autism article, rather than 'autism spectrum' (which is fine) - but all the discussion about all the work that still needs to be done on the entry is now tucked away at Talk:Autism spectrum/Archive 4 and a bit at Talk:Autism spectrum/Archive 3 - shouldn't there at least be prominent links to the most relevant Talk pages for this entry? And shouldn't the discussion about the old autism entry now be archived?
Thanks! Oolong (talk) 07:47, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion lost after merge 
Talk:Pearl Index

message: This article really needs a list of values for various methods. Those should also be added to the repective articles, as it has been in Oral contraceptive. --Apoc2400 01:18, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of values 

message: This section takes up more than half the article and a lot of it looks like OR. I think that for reasons of WP:WEIGHT it should be cut down. TallNapoleon (talk) 20:56, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism Section
Talk:Adrenal gland

message: and  I think this article is ready and I've put this article up for GAN with us three as conominators considering the work we've all put in. I hope that is OK! --Tom (LT) (talk) 12:46, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  GAN 

message: Prior to GA I'm going to make a few copyedits, which I hope are noncontroversial:
* Removing as many acronyms as possible
* Retitling "Epinephrine" to "Adrenaline" in view of the article's title ("Adrenal gland") and the predominant use of adrenaline throughout the article. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:23, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre-GA workup 

message: Question... we have a lot on steroidogenesis, should we move most of it to the steroidogenesis article? --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, in fact the Steroid article (where steroidogenesis redirects to) could use some of the text in here. I think maybe we can move the whole cholesterol uptake paragraph. The rest of the section has some relevant concepts but can be more concise. Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 02:54, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steroidogenesis 
Talk:Franz Schubert

message: I think it would be suitable to add in the context of Unsinnsgesellschaft the famous watercolor ″Kaleidoskop und die Draisine″ (16.7.1818 in the magazine of the Unsinnsgesellschaft)https://www.digital.wienbibliothek.at/download/pdf/1943510.pdf by the member Leopold Kupelwieser,  which, according to several scholars (see above), shows Schubert and Kupelwieser. What do you think?Chip-chip-2020 (talk) 11:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No objections, I'll add it back in.Chip-chip-2020 (talk) 20:43, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watercolor Kaleidoskop und die Draisine 

message: The pronunciation of Schubert's full name needs a good audio by a native person. – Hamid Hassani (talk) 16:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audio 

message: Is the aim to show as little as possible for these? (... also no mention of Wilhelm August Rieder in the caption, I see, but lots of other detail?) Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:55, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: MOS:CREDITS discourages crediting the artist in infoboxes. I've also thought that that caption is quite wordy, I'd suggest getting rid of it completely and expanding the details on the image description page (MOS:CAPSUCCINCT). As for the birth and death locations, I have no idea why more detailed ones are getting reverted. Ligaturama (talk) 09:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, discourages, but not prohibits? I guess we are unlikely to get a whole new article for that painting (as we did for the lead image at Beethoven). But I honestly think the linked name of the artist with a date would be more useful. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:19, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Having the artist in an infobox works fine on The Firebird, if an FA example is needed MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 22:41, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  which infobox? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:35, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant that if consensus later comes to add an infobox, having the artist in the caption isn't banned, as seen on The Firebird's IB. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 12:22, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth and death place in infobox
Talk:Turkic peoples

message: hazara of Afghanistan are Turkic too. Afghanistan is originally a Turkic land but only a couple centuries (about 3 centuries) migrants from India currently day Pakistan migrated (pushtoons).. 110.175.175.211 (talk) 01:36, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hazaras of Afghanistan are Turkic too 

message: Tengri Bögü Khan initially made the now extinct Manichaeism the state religion of the Uyghur Khaganate in 763 and it was also popular among the Karluks. It was gradually replaced by the Mahayana Buddhism. [citation needed] Citation source Page 210.
Helo, I propose the following source as a reference to the section mentioned. Demadrend (talk) 17:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed citation - Religion: Religious conversions: Buddhism 

message: Etymology:
First known mention of the term Turk is from Heredotus Histories as lyrcae,
and as Turcae in Pomponii Malae De situ orbis libri tres,
Difference in Lyrcae and Turcae came from translation mistakes. Because in this two historians they desribed in the same location also information about Iyrcae and Turcae is similar. Kaan C3Iik (talk) 21:10, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done - WP:SYNTH with primary sources (WP:PRIMARY) and pseudo-history. --HistoryofIran (talk) 00:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 May 2024
Talk:Somalia

message: gobolka raascasayr waa gobol kamid aha gobolada puntland, waxa loo magacaabay gobolnimo sanadkii 2013-ka.
caasimadiisu waa caluula
waxa uu kakooban yahay 5 degmo 
1-caluula 
2-baargaal
3-bareeda
4-murcanyo
5-gumbax
gobolkani waxaa mara badwaynta hindiyo iyo gacanka cadan.
waxa uu kucaan yahay maydiga iyo beeya 
bedkiisu waa 11,490km² 102.223.188.66 (talk) 19:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gobolka Raascasayr 

message: Okay, in the “HDI” tab, it says that Somalia is last. I think it would make more sense to change that to “193rd.” Also, the UN Country Insight states that Somalia’s HDI increased by 0.380 because it has basically never had data before. For South Sudan, they didn’t write “last.” 48JcL48 (talk) 00:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done You have implemented the edit yourself (you should've closed this request at the same time too). Liu1126 (talk) 23:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 14 March 2024 

message: What does this even mean? It's a very buzzword-ish way to refer to an entire population of a country. 2603:7081:1603:A300:4B6C:E19C:E222:F8E1 (talk) 22:12, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "THE Somali community"
Talk:Demographics of Turkey

message: A few days earlier, the first statistics for births and population were released in the page, showing 84.13 million people. A few days earlier a newer edit showed 84.399.278 residents and another edit today shows nearly 84.7 million people. It would be useful for the accuracy of the page that an accurately sourced statistic to be published, as three contradicting numbers have been added recently for 31 December 2021. NikosLikomitros (talk) 19:10, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it possible to get information from government regarding births and deaths ? 89.146.167.108 (talk) 16:11, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real population in 2022 

message: Demographics of Russia
Demographics of Greece
Demographics of France
Demographics of Germany
Demographics of Iraq etc. 
Ethnic groups part is too long at infobox unsurprisingly. Demographic articles about other countries isn't like this as you can see clearly. (although Russia and Germany are federative countries). I will change it likeways like examples above. Blubluman (talk) 19:37, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead, I would even go as far to suggest, if you would like to, removing the exhaustive list which exists of every major group in Turkey and move it to a more specialised article of 'Ethnic groups in Turkey' (currently a redirect to here). Tweedle (talk) 12:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox problems 

message: Why did deaths in 2000 and 2001 drop from 422,000 to 175,137? This makes no sense. Chaptagai (talk) 09:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Registered births and deaths
Talk:Naburimannu

message: To what source does VAT refer? —Finell (Talk) 04:46, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: VAT refers to the Vatican's collection of clay tablets (BM=British Museum etc.). Tom Peters 12:52, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Would it help to reference a guide to these citation forms, which are not familiar to the general reader? Is there one on Wikipedia that could be referenced? —Finell (Talk) 19:06, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was mistaken.  In Astronomical Cuneiform Textx, VAT is an abbreviation for Vorder-Asiatische Tontafelsammlung (Near-Asian Clay tablet collection) of the Staatliche Museen (National Musea) in Berlin. Tom Peters 22:38, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  VAT 

message: Does Neugebauer criticize Schnabel's interpretation of tersitu? —Finell (Talk) 04:51, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  He writes skeptically on interpreting it in his History of Ancient Mathematical Astronomy part 2 IV A 4, 4.A "Schools and Astronomers" (pp. 611..12), and he quotes himself on tersitu for ACT pp.12..13 .  But his main issue with Schnabel was that the latter maintained that Kidinnu had discovered pecession; he reportedly wrote a paper against it in Journal of the American Oriental Society 70 pp.1..8 (1950). Tom Peters 23:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neugebauer critisism 
Talk:Kennedy

message: What is the etymology of "Kennedy"? What does it mean?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.56.39.113 (talk) 11:45, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Such information would be found at Kennedy (surname). Scwlong (talk) 21:07, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: Does this need a separate entry? Looking for Kennedy with search should give you all the Kennedies you need. jheijmans
I cleaned up a lot of links TO this page, pointing them to the proper Kennedy articles. JimmB 22:09, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need 

message: Kennedy (horse)
Do horses get awarded Olympic medals? Andjam 06:41, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they do Jack Bornholm (talk) 18:58, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horses 

message: Cinnéide & Chinnéide aren't alternate spellings, that's the name in Irish. (Masc/Fem) Everytime 02:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate spellings 

message: I (anonymously, by mistake) moved the mention to JFK from the "See also" section to the prominent "People with the surname Kennedy". I'd guess that people looking for "Kennedy" are referring to JFK in far more cases than to ANY other entry in the disambig page. Forcing the users to scroll down so much to find his mention is insulting. More so taking into account that they have scrolled by across references to boulevards, highways, elementary/middle/high/army schools, colleges, universities, airports, bridges, space centers and stadiums named after him. Why would a casual reader want to scroll less to learn about a highway named after a former US president than about the president after whom the highway was named? — isilanes (talk|contribs) 17:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It might have been a little more convenient if you had just typed jfk (guess where it links to).--Celtus (talk) 06:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[John F. Kennedy]] in a more prominent position 

message: Disambiguation for  is being discussed at talk:Kennedy family -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 05:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|Kennedys}}"
Talk:Academy Awards

message: Should nominations for Best Foreign Language Film/Best International Feature remain included in the total nomination and win tallies for filmmakers, specifically the film's director? The director accepts the award and since 2014 their name is engraved on the award along with the submitting country but the country is credited as the nominee and the Oscar is awarded to the film. In my opinion, I think they should be included in the director's win and nomination tally as they are credited explicitly on the statuette and implicitly as the acceptor of the award. In addition, including these nominations and wins in this section's tallies I think more fully reflects the Academy's recognition of non-American filmmakers. That's my opinion but I think it is a topic worth discussing. Panopticanyounot (talk) 18:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable highest wins and nominees | By People 

message: how do people find out they were nominated? snail mail? once snail mail and now by text? what?
100.15.117.34 (talk) 03:05, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a talk page for discussions related to improving the related article. If you have general questions about the Academy Awards please utilize Google, reddit, Quora, etc and I'm sure you'll find your answer there. skarz (talk) 14:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  stupid question
Talk:Greenpeace

message: Unless I'm mistaken, the general definition of "renewable" excludes "fossil gas", and so this is a tacit contradiction in terms and the burden of proof would require a verifiable source to explain how "fossil gas" can be renewable, otherwise "a renewable electricity cooperative" should be changed to something like "an electricity cooperative claiming to provide renewable energy" so that the text isn't making the claim itself.
--RProgrammer (talk) 20:03, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction in terms?  "renewable" used to describe "fossil gas" 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:1971-CANNIKIN-2.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for February 7, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-02-07. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 12:25, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Moonie (disambiguation)

message: Why isn't this listed (0 the above) in the "See also" section? --Ludvikus (talk) 23:09, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Unification Church ]] 

message: Why isn't this (the above) listed in the "See also" section? --Ludvikus (talk) 23:09, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Unification Church of the United States ]] 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was not done  Skomorokh, barbarian  10:46, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Moonie (disambiguation) → Moonie — - [This disambiguation page should be the page for the word "Moonie" since it has several meanings. "Moonies" should continue to redirect to Moonie (Unification Church). --Northwestgnome (talk) 23:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

text: There is also Lewis Moonie, Baron Moonie. Northwestgnome (talk) 05:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But it's not possible that his article would be titled simply Moonie, and even if it were, he gets even fewer views than the Queensland town. Station1 (talk) 05:31, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

text: That was were it was going through AfD until the article was "rescued." Borock (talk) 15:05, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
As it appears that Moonie (Unification Church) is not going to be moved to Moonie, and an article title can not redirect to its own disambiguator, I'm moving the disambig page back to the base title. bd2412 T 00:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Since the result of the discussion was not to do that, I've pointed Moonie to Moonie (Unification Church) instead, which seems to be opposed by only one of the above editors. (Besides, this talk page was orphaned in the move.) Station1 (talk) 10:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Moonie (nickname)

message: This article is not really about the word, which would be against WP:Not a dictionary anyway. (Although there are some exceptions to that.) It is really about the controversy in the US about the use of the word in the 70s and 80s. Unification Church of the United States already has a section on that.  How about merge there? Steve Dufour (talk) 14:28, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm...might be a good idea. Actually the word "Moonie" is used more often for other things now days, like Sailor Moon fans.Kitfoxxe (talk) 15:11, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should not be merged as it is a record of attitudes pertaining at a particular time. It's contents are not adequately reflected in the target page. A rename would be more appropriate.Cathar66 (talk) 14:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Woman

message: Adult human female is better ShobanChiddarth (talk) 13:11, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No such change has occurred that I'm aware of. Possibly a Berenstein effect? The sources cited (and various others) tend to use use female  as an adjective modifying human or person. "Adult human female" is more common as a TERF/GC slogan. See also . –RoxySaunders 🏳️‍⚧️ (💬 • 📝) 13:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, even if the other version wasn't in use as a dog whistle the current version is more grammatically correct and there is no reason to prefer the Ferengi version. DanielRigal (talk) 20:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was it edited from "adult human female" to "adult female human"? 

message: Please let me remove a image from this article Mybirthday647 (talk) 20:42, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Mybirthday647, can you please tell us which image you would like removed. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 20:47, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page edit request  

message: ... Usersnipedname (talk) 08:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: GENSEX enforcement vs. generic vandalism. Dronebogus (talk) 12:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Also because trolls and bigots perseverate more on people assigned male at birth who are either gay/bi/pan or trans. Transwomen are targeted more than transmen and thus this article gets more trolls. Here's an article:  EvergreenFir (talk) 16:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does this page use [[extended confirmed protection]] even though [[Man]] uses semi-protection only?