lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Iceman

message: Specificly Valkilmer and there are a few others — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.31.18.139 (talk • contribs) 02:23, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  add internal links 

message: Just added Randy Orton to this list, as lately he's been labelled as an "Iceman" by Jim Ross & Jerry Lawler. Is this OK with the Wiki higher-ups?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.203.74.151 (talk) 13:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it used as a ring name or a widely used nickname, or was the name applied in passing only a few times? The nick isn't mentioned in his article.--ShelfSkewed Talk 15:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Randy Orton
Talk:Shinobi Shaw

message: I removed the following from the article because I really don't think RPG stats belong in Wikipedia. Since large numbers of these "vital stats" sections have been added to various articles, I'm using Talk:Strength level (comics) to discuss this issue in general. Bryan 08:25, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Silver Samurai

message: I removed the following from the article because I really don't think RPG stats belong in Wikipedia. Since large numbers of these "vital stats" sections have been added to various articles, I'm using Talk:Strength level (comics) to discuss this issue in general. Bryan 08:28, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh... those aren't RPG stats. Those are Marvel Handbook listings. To describe them as RPG stats is to describe reading Marvel comics as playing an RPG.
Official handbook of the Marvel universe puts the Silver Samauri's strength as normal for a man his age, weight, and gender who engages in regular intensive exercise. Scrapper 22:38, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

text: If he does have it, it must be a very  recent change, because he's never had it before. More likely, though, it's just fanboyish power-inflating cruft. If no citation is given after a while, just delete it. Noclevername 22:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I think that this counts for "a while" and so I'm deleting the super strength.  I've check all the Marvel Official guides, new and old and there isn't any mention. --Tickkid 04:16, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Am I the only one that thinks that the "Marvel Zombies" section is written in a really clumsy, ugly manner?  Anyone mind giving that a quick rewrite to make it easier on the eyes?  Dan 00:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I rewrote it. Lots42 09:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marvel Zombies

message: I would have added the Samurai's confrontation with Cable and Garrison Kane, only...I have no clue what was going on. I've read the two part a thousand times (pretty art) but that bit with the Samurai is confusing as blazes. Apparently Kane and Cable kill a bunch of ninjas over art?
Anyone care to pitch in? Lots42 09:32, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cable's Two Part Limited Series, Blood and Metal 
Talk:Storm (Marvel Comics)

message: "She can also bend light using moisture in the air and her manipulation of mist and fog to appear partially transparent, and in later comics, nearly invisible."
Storm has never done this. So why is it on her power section?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZenithGod (talk • contribs) 20:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invisibility. 

message: Her magical powers as well as her resistance to telepathy should be listed in the abilities section of the infobox. Also there has been instances of Storm manipulating matter to create clothes out of thin air. IIRC one such instance happened during the Dark Phoenix Saga when she tries to sneak into a Hellfire club party when Jean is under Mastermind's control, during this she transformed her X-men costume into a party dress. Penpaperpencil (Talk) 15:11, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No reply? Also in one interview G.Wilson defined her as an "Omega level mutant" (). Should be noted in the page as well. Also her power is not weather manipulation per se, it's atmokinesis i.e she manipulates the forces behind the weather which inturn affects the weather. Similar power is depicted by another Omega level Mister M. Penpaperpencil (Talk) 16:12, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Powers 

message: what about tattoos on her back of Japanese pictures in a comic... 173.167.154.65 (talk) 10:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  storm  

message: what are her meanings?***** 173.167.154.65 (talk) 10:34, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storm 

message: does her headdress give powers when she's weak? 173.167.154.65 (talk) 10:37, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Storm  

message: Maybe a new image of her outfit as the Regent of Arakko and Voice of Sol Cordelia Van Allen (talk) 20:35, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Main Image
Talk:Eddie Brock

message: I think we should mention Eddie Brock in this game even though it's just a Easter egg. SuperiorMalkom (talk) 20:43, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Long-standing consensus is not to include non-appearances. Argento Surfer (talk) 21:01, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eddie Brock in Spider-Man 2018. 

message: One or more images currently used in this article have been nominated for deletion as violations of the non-free content criteria (NFCC). 
You can read more about what this means and why these files are being nominated for deletion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics#Image deletion nominations for NFCC 8 and 3a.
You can participate at the deletion discussion(s) at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 May 1. If you are not familiar with NFCC-related deletion discussions, I recommend reading the post linked above first.
Sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:18, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image deletion nomination(s) 

message: Following the events of the last film and possible discussions shouldn’t there be a new section titled “Marvel Cinematic Universe” be added to the film part of “In Other Media”? 0Detail-Attention215 (talk) 15:13, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a new section to “In Other Media” 

message: I really think the Raimi section of Brock needs some pictures of Topher Grace as Brock, there should preferably be two pictures, one with "just" Brock (essentially just Topher in a promo / production shot) and one when Brock bonds with the symbiote (Topher in bodysuit, and teeth prosthetics) --Swordclash117 (talk) 22:39, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  /* Sam Raimi film series */ could we add some pictures?
Talk:Lupinus arboreus

message: This plant has insane numbers of common names, all multiplied by 2 because of the variant US spelling.  I have done a redirect from the most likely, but there are many more that could be done.
This article would be improved if someone who really understands what is going on between the yellow and blue varieties could get at it.
Also a picture of the whole shrub, or of its flowers, would be better for the taxotable, though the current picture is useful and could be retained lower down the article because it gives a clear idea of the size of the leaves.
seglea 08:33, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Good to get some better info. In view of the past confusion in the page and its better restriction to a single species (with other pages for other species), I've moved the page to the unambiguous scientific name. - MPF 09:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Is there a reason to remove the captions from the photos from this article? Showing the plant growing within the native habitat seems noteworthy of the caption - please discuss. Jooojay (talk) 10:08, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos
Talk:Lex (software)

message: Don't think we need "How to use a makefile here"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.128.159.196 (talk) 20:51, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Think

message: Why is this at Lex programming tool instead of Lex? It's not like there's a disambiguation page there. -- Cyrius|✎ 05:58, 13 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: There is now, but the title still grates. Nobody calls it "lex programming tool" - just "lex". The title should probably be Lex (programming tool). Hairy Dude 11:50, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's typical to use "(software)" as a disambiguator unless there's some other significant program called lex. --Mrwojo 18:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the talk page because I thought the same thing.  Since everyone seems to agree, I'm going to go ahead and move this page to Lex (software) in accordance with the discussion and other software page titles. Tvh2k (talk) 22:44, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title? 

message: I can't see the need for a link to Lex Luthor in the "See All" section.  If anyone agrees, please remove it.  I'm assuming it is there for a reason.... 129.44.216.105 03:19, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lex Luthor? 

message: The example file is for flex.  Someone should write one for lex proper and move that one to the article for flex, which doesn't have one.  There are some subtle differences.
:
:I removed the flex %option line that is not from lex, and which sets the output buffer size to zero.  Now it runs successfully though actual lex. It also runs with lex -r to generate ratfor output. I didn't check the one in the flex article. I now don't see anything wrong with this one. Gah4 (talk) 02:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example files 

message: Is it "lex" or "Lex" (when it is not the file name of an executable)?  --Mortense (talk) 13:51, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's capitalized in the original paper. —Mrwojo (talk) 23:33, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "lex" or "Lex"? 

message: it find it easy to read the first sentence like "in cs, _a_ lex is a ...". i would prefer to have it like it is done for yacc, i.e. "lex is a computer program ..."
217.191.201.195 (talk) 21:28, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and changed the first sentence. I think the intent was to establish context but it also sounded categorical. —Mrwojo (talk) 23:33, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  first sentence 

message: The 4th link is broken. Please, if anybody knows what must be there, replace it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.215.131.92 (talk) 01:33, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: there are several copies - used one TEDickey (talk) 12:52, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken link 

message: There is a  about lex beeing part of the POSIX standard. It is and the the web page to cite is http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/lex.html but I can't figure out how to add a proper citation to wikipedia.
:Done. (How: Help:Citations quick reference) Colintedford (talk) 08:22, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  POSIX
Talk:2000 Canadian federal election

message: I will add a province-by-province result to this page.
Pellaken 13:22, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So The Tom has now changed the colours back on several of the pages, and reinserted 'Party of Canada' or 'Party' after the party names.  What do people think of this? I don't want to get into a revert war, so I'll pose the questions here.  I think my colour combo is easier to read, particlaurly when it comes to the Communist Party's indianred in Tom's colour scheme, which is very difficult to read. I'll let others make that decision, though.  I really don't think, however, that adding 'Party of Canada' after each party's name adds anything beyond more clutter to already-crowded tables. Is anyone with me on this?   The full names of the parties are always available by clicking on the short form and going to the party's article.  Comments please? Kevintoronto 15:32, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: August 9 Changes

message: We now have consistent colour-coding of the Conservative Party (historical) and the Progressive Conservative Party from 1867-2000. The "powderblue" should make the data legible on most if not all monitors, unlike the previous colour, which was almost the same colour as the text on both monitors that I use. I really hope that we won't have someone go in and randomly change a few years' elections to different colours and mess up this consistency. After 2000, there is no need to adjust colours, I think, since the new Conservative Party is the result of a merger, and therefore warrants a new colour. Kevintoronto 22:39, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: September 24, 2004 changes

message: The tables have been converted to the new format that was developed by consensus at Talk:Canadian federal election results since 1867 over a period of months. Eventually all federal elecitons tables will be converted to this format. See Talk:Canadian federal election, 2004 for more explanation. Kevintoronto 19:14, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Results table

message: User:G. Timothy Walton I'm not saying it isn't true, I'm just wondering if it's notable, considering Harper and Trudeau won very close to 40%. Ak-eater06 (talk)  16:46, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd consider it notable. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 05:52, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last paragraph of lead
Talk:Willibrord

message: Why has User:JackLynch discarded the recently edited, carefully worked upon text that supplanted this old E.B. text? Can it be retrieved? What's up with this? Wetman 14:19, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: edits

message: was his father wilgils, or st hilgis, or what? it appears we have contradictory translations of this guys name. Jack 01:04, 29 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  his father 

message: The Wikipedia articles for Plechelm and Willibrord each claim them as the patron saint of the Netherlands.  The Wikipedia article for Nicholas merely claims him for Amsterdam, but it used to claim the whole of the Netherlands, and web pages elsewhere still do.  I'm thinkin' that there should be a cage match. —SlamDiego 18:41, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  All of the Above? 

message: The illustration at right was uploaded to Commons, where I noticed it. It was simply labelled "old book". It's a C13-C14 Netherlandish? French? manuscript illumination that was used on an album cover for the music to the Officinium Sancti Willibrordi, but we need to have some better information before it's added to the article. Anyone? --Wetman (talk) 22:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: it is a 10th century german manuscript illumination, painted in Trier, which was part of a manuscript from Echternach. Today it kept in Paris 8Biblothéque Nationale, lat. 10510) -- 80.139.29.136 (talk) 22:00, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustration

message: Some of the phrasing in this article regarding the status of the Austrasian mayoral family is a bit misleading. The article alludes to "a Carolingian-sponsored mission into Frisia," but surely there were no "Carolingians" before Charles Martel! I suspect "Peppinid" or "Arnulfing" might be a better word to use. Moreover, the article describes Peppin as "the Frankish king." Not so! The Frankish realm was still nominally ruled by the Merovingian kings in Willibrord's lifetime, however much de facto power the mayoral dynasty in fact wielded.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.111.220.6 (talk) 05:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "Carolingian"?

message: Can someone provide the original source for the anecdote about Radbod refusing baptism because he would rather spend eternity with his ancestors?
:Vita Vulframni episcopi Senonici, (MGH, page. 668) P.s. the baptism scene is originally not with Willibrord, but with Wulfram of Sens. The story is highly likely fictional. Sonty567 (talk) 18:01, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Radbod's Baptism
Talk:Economic Cooperation Foundation

message: Zero0000, thank you very much for finding those links.  How did you do it?  I would be interested to know.  I have added some detail regarding the funding based upon the text at the the websites that you found.  It seems that Nathan Cummings funded a joint program that the ECF was involved in rather than the ECF. 
:Nature Knows No Boundaries, a cooperative venture on the environment between Palestinian and Israeli students, Economic Cooperation Foundation, Peace Continuity Fund, New York, NY, $11,000 -- this was in 1996
I couldn't find where in  it notes funding for the ECF.  I did find a spot where it noted that the ECF came up with a list of $36 million in project to be funded but not the funding itself.   Could you provide a page reference for me.  At my age, I could have just missed it....though I dont understand why Adobe's search facility missed it.  But please look at the page, perhaps I did find the reference you noticed.
 
Thank you again.  I am very glad that working together we are able to improve Wikipedia. OneVoice 14:28, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mydoom

message: If MyDoom leaves a back door that can be exploited by other viruses, does this mean that a Web site could have a simple script that tests users' computers to see if it is there?  Has anyone made such a site?  I can picture a little box the size of a "looks better with browser X" box that displays whether the user's computer is infected or not, to be placed on multiple sites as an amenity. Wnt (talk) 00:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back door test? 

message: I wanna die 192.15.126.101 (talk) 06:25, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: maybe don't 82.3.59.98 (talk) 20:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Die
Talk:World3

message: Since the modelers that created the model are most familiar with it, their criticism is most relevant
''
Of course, since Donella Meadows was very closely associated with the model, she would be unlikely to see problem in the basic qualitative assumptions, so outside criticism needs to be looked at
These are subjective statements, better suited to an essay than to a scholarly article
Worik (talk) 05:48, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed those statements, and the unsourced statements that the criticism is "false".  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 16:45, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: For quite a while, the "Criticism of the model" section has begun with the sentence, One of the major criticisms of the model is that it simply has not reflected the reality of the world since the 1970s when the model was first published. Would it be appropriate to flag this with a "citation needed"? If the criticism described is indeed a "major criticism," it shouldn't be too hard to find a few examples of it.
On a related note, The Limits to Growth cites a 2008 paper called "A comparison of The Limits to Growth with 30 years of reality," which claims that the Reference Run of the World3 model agrees fairly well with data collected after the model ran. Would it be appropriate to cite that paper here as well?
Vectornaut (talk) 01:35, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: (That's a terrible URL.  Can't you add more unnecessary tags?  Sorry.  It's not your fault.  It is terrible, though.)  The article appears usable, but it doesn't specifically name the model, at least in the abstract.  If it names the model in the paper, it seems appropriate here, as well.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 09:06, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The URL is terrible, and on top of that it no longer appears to work. Sorry! Here's a copy of the paper posted on CSIRO's web page, which should be more stable. If you want an "official" copy of the paper from the journal (Global Environmental Change, volume 18, issue 3), you'll probably have to use a search engine, since I don't understand ScienceDirect's URL system... The World3 model is named in the paper, so I'll go ahead and mention it in the article. Vectornaut (talk) 15:32, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Criticism of the model" section 
Talk:Karl Wallenda

message: In the 'In popular culture section,' the link to 'Rounders' (Wallenda's quote was used in the Movie Rounders) links to the game 'Rounders' and not one of the three films of that title. It should be changed to the correct movie.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.184.204.56 (talk) 12:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Telmo Zarra

message: Appearances / goals should be league only, not league and cup. Have edited.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.45.136 (talk) 22:12, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Appearances / goals

message: Is it Zarraonandia or Zarraonaindia? -- -- Error 21:06, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How is he Gitano?
In the Montoya side?
--Error (talk) 00:53, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In don't fully understand you question, but he is mentioned here along with other Spanish Romani football players:  Kenshin (talk) 08:04, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They reference Wikipedia as their source but Jesús Navas does not talk about Gitanos. --Error (talk) 00:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are right, I didn't noticed that they used Wikipedia as reference. I'll remove the info of being Romani. Kenshin (talk) 08:42, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  I used the reference you gave to me. --Error (talk) 23:02, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Gitano
Talk:Folkung

message: The source-book is a sub-standard one.--217.112.249.156 06:04, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well if it is peer-reviewed by the biggest publishing house in Finland, that's enough. --Drieakko 06:31, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The source-book is a sub-standard one

message: Since the're no evidence of the word Folkung orgining from people's king and those words acually would be spelled Folkkung or Folk-kung in Swedish it seems unnecessary to mention that in Wikipedia doesn't it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ursa Magnus (talk • contribs) 18:49, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The ending -ung and -ing is often used to denote the ancestry, clan or family, for example Sköldung, Wulfling, Yngling or even Viking. In the case of Folkung it could mean that they are descendents of a man named Folke, which is a common Scandinavian name. It could also mean "a man descendent from the people" or "a man of the people" Magnus Andersson (talk) 10:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The word Folkung 

message: I suggest that this article should deal with mainly two things: the definitions of the term Folkung, and, as we sometimes say in Swedish, "the real Folkungs", the party that opposed the crown under Eric XI Ericson, Valdemar Birgerson and Magnus III Birgerson. The article should not be about the house of Bjelbo, that has an article of its own. 
I have consequently removed an annoying number of links to persons of the house of Bjälbo, as well as the coat of arms. Illustrations to do with "the real Folkungs" are welcome.
Accusativen hos Olsson (talk) 17:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The scope of this article