Talk:Nokia N70

message: The iteration of Bluetooth used in this phone needs to be confirmed. It may be Bluetooth 1.2, there are contradictory specs out there. 81.153.150.88 23:15, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is very hard to read; obaid the sentences are just too long. It needs editing. I dont understand alot of it so i cant do it. Thanks Wright123 19:36, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Long sentences

message: I've restored the talk page and done some clean-up on the article. I'm going to check into a couple of the unreferenced claims, since AFAIK the N70 can't play N-Gage games (if for no reason other than that the physical card sizes are different, and AFAIK there is no online delivery system). Wibbble 17:33, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice work. For the record, the N70 can play N-Gage games, but only via illegally hacked game files and some workarounds. That's somewhat different to the claim made in the article, which it appears was based on unfounded speculation, so I certainly have no problem with you removing it. — Impi 22:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting, and thanks. Wibbble 23:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: I fail to see any reference to this phone's firmware nor its issues.
It seems that no one can but some criticism in here, because it's "not relevant". Seriously, then what is relevant? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.196.179.109 (talk) 13:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you can't talk much about firmware versions because it's not verifiable from reliable sources. Nokia don't publish much information on firmware, so anything you post will be hearsay and speculation - this is inherently unreliable and thus unencyclopaedic. Also, most 'complaint' sections I've seen on mobile phone articles are pure original research by someone who has one of those handsets and wants a forum to complain about it. That's not what wikipedia's about. If you want to do that, take it to the Nokia discussion boards or somewhere similar. Wibbble 18:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, you can't talk much about firmware versions because it's not verifiable from reliable sources. Nokia don't publish much information on firmware, so anything you post will be hearsay and speculation - this is inherently unreliable and thus unencyclopaedic. Wrong there. Not only Nokia publishes their firmware information, but you also have available a tool called Nokia Software Updater that searches for updates and updates your mobile phone if an update is found (firmware listed, etc). So let me get this straight... operative systems; programming languages; programs; etc; they're all entitled to have a (latest) numbered version, but mobile phone firmware can't? Seriously dude... --89.180.51.117 22:03, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  NSU is a tool for updating software, but Nokia does not publish changelogs or any other useful information for firmware versions. You could use the web tool that goes alongside NSU to determine what the newest software available through NSU is for a specific product code, but that's it. (And remember that NSU is not the only way to do a software update - service centres have access to a much sider range of software than the NSU tool.) If you have a reliable source for firmware changelogs or latest software versions, then be bold and include it in the article. Wibbble 13:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's a tool for updating firmware. I won't be bold when my job is on the line*. There's nothing wrong with posting the latest firmware/software information of a given product, but I will not reveal what is inside corporate newletters* and dev notifications*. Nokia publishes no information on that for the general public, but that doesn't void the information itself. --89.180.51.117 18:44, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually, yes, that does void the information for the purposes of wikipedia, since it means that you cannot provide any references, and so anything you were to add would not be verifiable. Verifiability is one of the core principles of wikipedia, and not something that can be dismissed. Wibbble 19:04, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, you can't talk much about firmware versions because it's not verifiable from reliable sources.  Erm... what do you mean? You access their website and find out your firmware. May I salient: their = Nokia's? --194.117.20.2 10:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No references to firmware? 

message: I've removed this statement:
"At the time of its launch, the N70 was the smallest Series 60 handset[citation needed]".
It wasn't, the smaller 3230 was already out:
* The Nokia 3230, announced 02-Nov-04, is 109 x 49 x 19 mm 
* The Nokia N70, announced 27-Apr-05, is 108.8 x 53 x 22.8 mm 
--192.100.124.219 (talk) 09:06, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Smallest Series 60 handset[citation needed]" 

message: Definitely not a self created picture, I'll upload a self-taken one of mine as soon as I can upload files. Jupter-manzana (talk) 07:35, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Did this phone become available on Q4 2004 or Q3 2005? Both are mentioned in the article...
Evert (talk) 07:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Release date

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:49, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion