lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Number Munchers

message: Most players found the Primes mode to be easiest, as the highest prime at the most difficult level was only 47, thus requiring players to only memorize the short list of 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, and 47.
This definitely isn't true for the Apple II version of the game. I just played it and it goes at least into the 60s, if not higher.
--Mashuren 08:41, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true for at least some (Macintosh) versions. I'm not sure exactly which versions this is true of, though. —Lowellian (reply) 21:40, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I remember playing primes mode, and it didn't count 2 as a prime number. 76.111.88.167 (talk) 07:02, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Highest primes in Primes mode
Talk:Mr. Murder (novel)

message: I dont know why theres that infobox needed when there is an infobox with the labeled critereia. 
User:Voshvoshka
: I guess someone added the infobox and forgot to remove the tag on the talk page. I removed it. Garion96 (talk) 12:46, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

message: WTF why does it need a write up?!! It's a perfectly good write up. Voshvoshka 02:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Write Up? 
Talk:Grey reef shark

message: GrahamBould just changed from Gray to Grey reef shark, I was about to change back, but I did a check in fishbase and it spells it Grey, same with ITIS, marinebio spells Gray, a quick Google test seams to indicate that Grey is more common, so everything seams to indicate that we have the wrong name and no redirect, I will be bold and do a move now, which will make a redirect, but I'm not sure. Anyone? Stefan 14:29, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hum can not move over a redirect since it has a history, anyway, then lets talk and decide and then make the request to an admin to move if it is correct. I think it is. Anyone else? Stefan 14:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Leonard Compagno spells it grey in Sharks of the World, Princeton University Press, New Jersey 2005 . He's pretty authoritative. GrahamBould 09:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gray or Grey reef shark? 

message: Never heard of Gray reef shark--146.50.201.49 07:42, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Must be Grey 

message: Is this species actually viviparous, or is it ovoviviparous? DS (talk) 15:13, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: All members of the family Carcharhinidae are viviparous, except for the tiger shark. -- Yzx (talk) 18:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reproduction
Talk:Ganges shark

message: Recently G. fowlerae and G. siamensis have been reclassified as synonyms of G. gangeticus. Since all of the articles are relatively short, already contain duplicate information, and are unlikely to be expanded independently, I propose that we merge them all into the article Ganges shark (G. gangeticus). -Vandraedha (talk) 10:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. Most new content was condensed into a new "Taxonomy" section, with an additional "Conservation" paragraph for the Irrawaddy river shark. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 06:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

text: *Much appreciated.  Rgrds.  (Same dynamic IP as above.) --64.85.216.91 (talk) 19:34, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: However, I note that even today (3 October 2020), several years later, both FishBase and (consequently) COL list G. fowlerae, G.gangeticus, and G. siamensis as three separate species. Is this entirely due to a very slow updating process for FishBase, or is the aforementioned reclassification not universally accepted? (See https://www.fishbase.in/identification/SpeciesList.php?genus=Glyphis and http://www.catalogueoflife.org/annual-checklist/2019/browse/tree/id/d7360f548513d4816713de5fdf68e813, respectively.) JoergenB (talk) 20:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I changed the external link from a bare generic link to the WRMS species template to point to the exact page on WoRMS. I do believe that the template itself is beneficial to the page, because it adds several maintenance categories if certain facts don't match. However, after looking at it on the page, I'm not sure that putting that template in External Links is the best place for it. Feel free to move it around (or completely remove it) if you feel that it works better elsewhere. Are there any other opinions? P.S. - I don't get offended when material I add is removed or changed to make a positive improvement to the page, but I do appreciate feedback when that happens so that I can improve my editing. :-) Vandraedha (talk|contribs) 18:58, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  WoRMS links and template 

message: Have there been any recorded encounter between Ganges sharks and tigers (as in the cats)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarsath3 (talk • contribs) 02:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question! I would imagine that historically, it is quite possible that a the 2 species have interacted. However, I"m not sure how probable that interaction is. Considering the rarity and elusiveness of both species (especially the ganges shark), it is unlikely that such an interaction has been documented. Much of the documentation/information about ganges sharks comes from written journals and museum specimens. If you find out the answer, please add it, along with your reliable source, to the relevant articles. :-) Vandraedha (talk|contribs) 17:37, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ganges sharks and tigers (as in the cats)
Talk:Prodigal Son (novel)

message: There is a comic book (adaptation?) that I have come across, but not read. I'm not sure if it is a prequel, sequal, afterword etc. Just putting it up for adoption. Wmcscrooge (talk) 02:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comic Book Adaptation
Talk:Bernese Mountain Dog

message: I know it's being used in its original sense and isn't being used in a derogatory manner, but I still think there's no need to use the word bitches when male and female would work just fine. Wikipedia should be as safe and welcoming a space as possible without compromising it's integrity. Here, using the word bitches provides no benefit to Wikipedia but serves to potentially distance and offend some viewers. Science Is My Life (talk) 08:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bitches 

message: A suspected cause is lack of genetic diversity {there is a lot of inbreeding, which has increased over the years).
These are peer-reviewed journals.  So what is your issue?  7&6=thirteen (☎) 21:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: MDPI is known for having a very poor review process, said article was only cited twice elsewhere. Traumnovelle (talk) 07:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You removed two sources, not one.  MDPI is not cited.  Journal of Heredity and Genes are and those are what you deleted.  These are peer-reviewed journals.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The claim wasn't supported by the other citation. Genes is an MDPI journal, if you bothered to read your own link you'd know that. Traumnovelle (talk) 15:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable sources (revisited)
Talk:Angelshark

message: I believe it's actually pronounced ANGEL shark, no?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.206.28.218 (talk) 22:27, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added status to Taxobox 

message: — Assignment last updated by ProcyonEnthusiast (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BSC 4052 Conservation Biology
Talk:Whispers (Koontz novel)

message: i haven't read the book, so i can't do it, but the summary that is up now is a chore to read, and not always clear what's happening. --dan 08:41, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  editting needed 
Talk:Range Rover/Archive 1

message: Only the current parent company is Ford, before that it was BMW, British Leyland and Rover. GraemeLeggett 08:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also since this is an overview article covering the whole marque and not just the current model, then oughtn't all the parent manufacturers be listed.GraemeLeggett 11:37, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Manufacturer

message: This paragraph; 'The First Luxury SUV?' needs to be changed as it states the Jeep Wagoneer to be the first SUV, which, as discussed in the Jeep Wagoneer discussion page, was not.
The Range Rover may not have truly been the first SUV, but it did however, define the word SUV - offroad ability, with luxury.
Mr. Bridger 16:47, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit of 'The First Luxury SUV?' 

message: Even if the article stated the Jeep Wagoneer to be the first luxury SUV (not SUV), it was irrelevant for this article, and is debatable. I am glad to see the paragraph 'The first luxury SUV?' has been added to, however, I don't believe the Range Rover was initally 'quite a utilitarian vehicle', and I haven't seen any evidence to suggest this. 
--Mr. Bridger 18:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the claim about "quite a utilitarian vehicle", which is quite patently untrue. Moveover, this contradicts what was written in the previous sentence; if coil springs and disk brakes are the non-utilitarian, or "advanced" suspension/braking in question, then this was not a later modification, but rather one that was part of the Range Rover from the very beginning. Collard 22:57, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Some questions tha tmight throw light on the issue. When does the term SUV first come into use? Does the Range Rover predate the term? When it came out what did Rover describe it as? GraemeLeggett 09:41, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luxury SUV 

message: I've never heard it referred to as a "Land Rover Range Rover", it sounds ridiculous. Its always called a Range Rover". Is this what the car is actually called by the company? JW 13:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Land Rover Range Rover?
Talk:Druss the legend

message: I have heard that Druss was inspired by a physically imposing friend of Gemmells', who when David was threatened by a group of men in a bar diffused the situation by crushing a glass in his hand, causing the group to think twice. However, can find no references to this on a quick google. Anyone else heard this/can verify it as it would make a nice triva addition to the article. --Angelstorm 09:08, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Oliver Bierhoff

message: lol 1000 goals  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.227.49.14 (talk) 06:44, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Berti Vogts was never "manager" of the Nationalmannschaft, he was the Trainer. Bierhoff was the first manager and is still on the job, while the Trainer is now Jogi Löw (whose name has nothing to do with "low", low is only the level of Anglo-Saxon language education).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:7E:8F7E:3870:4C83:AD9D:9475:956D (talk) 15:09, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ignorant, arrogant Anglo-Saxons
Talk:OGRE

message: The article really needs some expansion on 
* what the engine is good for,
* why people think it's so good,
* why people don't think it's so good,
* what makes it so special compared to other engines,
* and so on.
In particular, the feature section is a good example of this: An external link to feature list is not how to do Wikipedia article. Please explain and summarise the features of the engine.
The things that need cleanup:
* Project history is too detailed and disproportionate to the article. Please concentrate on major changes in the project, for example, what was new in all of the major releases.
With these done, I'd guess the article would be much better. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:25, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs some expansion & cleanup

message: Due to this, I moved the page to OGRE 3D. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Noerrorsfound (talk • contribs) 01:38, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OGRE Engine = RAS syndrome 

message: Just to let you know. The purpose of selecting an article is both to point readers to the article and to highlight it to potential contributors. It will remain on the portal for a week or so. The previous selected article was Global File System - a distributed filesystem which was free, then proprietary, then made free again.
For other interesting free software articles, you can take a look at the archive of PF's selectees. --Gronky (talk) 11:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Things move on, as always, and the new selectee is GNU wget - the highly customisable and scriptable command line http client. --Gronky (talk) 10:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Portal:Free software]]: OGRE 3D is now the selected article 

message: I can't shake the feeling that the statement, "OGRE (Object-Oriented Graphics Rendering Engine) is a scene-oriented, flexible 3D rendering engine...", means there are other oriented engines.
If this is the case, perhaps a link could be made to an article about the different oriented engines could be made/linked?
If "scene-oriented" doesn't mean anything, perhaps a different wording could be used? --217.122.58.253 (talk) 16:35, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  scene-oriented ? 

message: It seems worth mentioning that OGRE started out with the idea of being fully compatible with DOOM. John Carmack himself was on board with the project.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.106.200 (talk) 14:04, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doom Compatible 

message: Axiom Engine redirects here, to OGRE#OGRE ports and wrappers, but the entire article does not mention “Axiom”! Can anyone fix this? PJTraill (talk) 10:02, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Axiom Engine redirects here, unhelpfully
Talk:21 (drinking game)

message: "The recipient has to answer with "F**k Off"."
Since you can't pronounce F**k Off, i suppose it's supposed to be "Fuck Off"? This is wikipedia, just because it's servers are located in the USA doesn't mean it's illegal to use the term fuck. Uh. "Look at me, I'm so cool, I said a swear word that I wasn't supposed to say! Oh noes!". Ran4 05:22, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The tone of this article blatantly needs fixing.  It should be obvious. Thinboy00 talk/contribs 16:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added {{tl|Inappropriate tone}} 

message: This whole group of drinking game articles are some of the poorest sourced, most poorly worded, messiest articles I have read on Wikipedia. I am not suggesting they be deleted but there must be some sources for these games as I know they exist. 
Someone went through a lot of trouble to make a nice little template and info box for these games, but the articles are lacking in sources and sometimes contain tone issues as noted above. Normally I don't like to cop out and say "Somebody else better clean this up," but I wouldn't even know where to start.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.81.123.153 (talk) 09:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some issues 

message: There are perhaps two aspects to articles on these games: their rules and their history. As for the rules, formal sources often do not exist, or at least are not traceable, since the rules have evolved to a large degree through custom.  It would certainly be interesting to outline the origins of the games however.
The articles are intended to be instructive and therefore follow a simple chronological structure with some helpful repetition.  Bawdy humour (added according to players' taste) is an intrinsic ingredient of an enjoyable game and should rightly feature in their explanation.  
:". Replacing the roman numerals with other humorous or explicit phrases can make the game more interesting (e.g. replace I with "No", V with "Daddy" and X with "Don't touch me!")"  'bawdy', well, that's one word for it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.226.236 (talk) 21:22, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources / Style / Content 

message: Ok, I love playing this game so I've re-written the article completely; shortening it, removing spurious content and simplifying the rules.
There may be a few too many bullet points though!  Please edit as you see fit. Caseykcole (talk) 22:53, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write
Talk:Siege of Calais (1940)

message: @HLGallon, while generally supportive of your edits, I would prefer you to discuss things you consider irrelevant first, as I put them there for a reason, even if it's not clear to you. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 13:41, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Tidied a few oversights, more of my typos and shifted a couple of sentences around for consistency.Keith-264 (talk) 07:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: Happy to add information on significant aerial ops if and when the main author wants them. Dapi89 (talk) 20:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to see more Brylcreem ;O)Keith-264 (talk) 06:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air 

message: Ooh, Mister, must we?Keith-264 (talk) 10:35, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal frenzy 
Talk:Battle of Hoyerswerda

message: * Ensured that the article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. 
* The article would benefit from:  in-text citations. --Rosiestep (talk) 17:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008]] 

message: I have given this article the demeaning assessment of Stub-class because it does not cite a single source. –Vami_IV✠ 07:17, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub-class assessment
Talk:Shore Lark

message: When you search for 'horned lark' in Google books or scholar, there are much more results than if you search for 'shore lark'. From this, it seems that 'horned lark' is more widely used. Therefore, I am proposing that this page be moved to Horned Lark. Discussion would be appreciated. —focus 02:39, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Template talk:Campaignbox War of the Grand Alliance

message: Could an administrator please change the name of this Campaignbox to Nine Years' War. Thanks. Rebel Redcoat (talk) 20:52, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New name 

message: More red link to articles that do not exist are being added here like the Spanish War of Succession campaignbox. Is there a reason for this? Are these articles in progress? Eastfarthingan (talk) 20:35, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links
Talk:List of Rhodesian flags

message: Shouldn't this article be titled "Flags of Zimbabwe"?
*No as these are Rhodesian flags not Zimbabwean flagsMangwanani 16:06, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zimbabwe or Rhodesia? 

message: A definite scarcity of enthusiasm for discussion on this or the above topics.... I support the proposal as; a) there need not be two articles about the flags of a country and in fact why not combine flags of Rhodesia and flags of Zimbabwe? and; b) the choice of 1896 as a starting point is a poor one as it marks no boundary in administration or territory delineation and the BSAC flag was in use in the territory from 1890 anyway. --Sinazita (talk) 08:34, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Strong support: These two should have merged a long time ago. Charles Essie (talk) 23:16, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

text: Weak oppose, I think it's convenient to have separate pages for the pre-1980 and post-1980 flags, and of course describing a flag as "Zimbabwean" in a pre-1980 context is not really correct, but I'm happy to go along with consensus. —Cliftonian (talk) 07:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:German verbs

message: I'm trying to learn to past tense of the subjunctive mood these days, so as I learn I think I'll be expanding these bits somewhat. Wilsonsamm (talk) 00:34, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: To learn how to use the past tense of the subjunctive mood, I want, I advise you to read about the features of verb conjugation in DeutscherPapa. Informative article. Marta987M987 (talk) 09:04, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  tense and mood 

message: Why do the conjugations not mention past participles?  With strong verbs these usually involve changes in vowels just as past tenses do. Michael Hardy (talk) 22:57, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conjugations 

message: Firstly, I'm a German native speaker so my intuitions in regards to the German language can be trusted. I just wanted to point out that contrary to what the article states 'Ich gebe es ihm.' actually isn't strange at all. To me it sounds perfectly normal. If other native speakers agree, and I'm pretty sure they will, I suggest this phrase be moved to the 'normal' section.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.221.230.140 (talk) 20:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Components and word order 

message: I missing the prefix in- in the article. It is a seldom and often mean the negative like in english, i.E. consistent/inconsistent --> konsequent/inkonsequent or acceptable/not acceptable -->  akzeptabel/inakzeptabel --195.145.211.209 (talk) 07:08, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is missing for two reasons. 1., I cannot see what it has to do with verbs. 2., it is not a German prefix (though arguably rather cognate with un- which is), which is why it is only attached to foreign words taken from Latin.--91.34.213.46 (talk) 18:13, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inseparable prefix ''in-''
Talk:John Whiting Award

message: Most of the information for this entry had to be obtained from the internet. Some of the award winners are missing from the list. Also some of the years may be wrong by a year or two.
i tried to obtain a complete list from Arts Council England but they were unable to say if a complete list existed. They say that most of the records prior to 1994 are now held by the Victoria and Albert Museum, but I was not able to find many details from their on-line catalogue.
Jon Whiting 10:00, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled