Talk:Chembai

message: Hi, please list down suggestions here to help this article meet FAC. -- ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 19:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps you've got to read  your own user talk page once in a while, or explain properly with examples as to what you mean by "partiality". Thanks & regards ­ ॐ Kris (☎ talk | contribs) 09:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review comments 

message: Informationally speaking, this has a lot of promise.  There are a number of issues that need to be dealt with before this can be considered.
# The references need to be cited better.  See WP:CITE for pointers.  
#:Along with this, consider some non-web references.  They may be hard to come by given the language gap, but his importance would probably suggest some possible better references.
# It's very listy.  Consider working the paragraph breaks for performances and appearances into a more prose-based standard.  The way it breaks up is jarring when read.
# Consider moving the recordings to their own separate pages.  The article is detailed enough where it doesn't need to be here, plenty can be said to sustain individual articles, and that's the basic standard anyway.
# Fair use images need rationales, and if you're planning to eventually bring this to FA, you may need some more detail regarding the GFDL licensing, but I'm not sure about that.
Good luck! --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ALSO The article has some WP:NPOV problems as well. I'm afraid it comes across as hero worship of Chembai.--Ling.Nut 02:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review

message: See this original reversion by venu62 without specifying any rhyme or reason.
I undid that and he repeatedly reverts the page which proves his vandalism. He says I created this article so I cant revert his vandalism, which is plain cock and bull story. ­ Kris (talk) 15:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See these discussions regarding this matter. This editor has a history of promoting his websites on wikipedia. WP:NPA guidelines tell us that calling a valid edit vandalism is a personal attack. Parthi talk/contribs 19:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism by [[user:venu62]] 

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "cs" :
** Chembai Selvam - Biography of Chembai written by LRV, 1954 (pg 181-186)
** Chembai Selvam - Biography of Chembai written by LRV, 1954 (pg 28)
** Chembai Selvam - Biography of Chembai written by LRV, 1954
DumZiBoT (talk) 20:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 

message: There has been a series of edits by IP address editors. They seem to be inserting material that, in my opinion, is at least partially un-encyclopaedic and not appropriate here. Can some admins review and decide whether to protect the page from IP addresses for a while, so that we get to know true identity of the possible fan club? VasuVR (talk, contribs) 16:06, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the refs are either dead links or non-RS sources. I'd second semi-pp for a while. -SpacemanSpiff 18:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd third semi-pp; too much puppetry. Ncmvocalist (talk) 19:35, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

text: There seems to be a pattern of content removals by Spaceman and Ncmvocalist that appear to be not inspired by good faith. I would like to know how the content that was previously existing (for a long time) is removed repeatedly without first discussing them or giving reasons on each of the refs or paras that are being deemed unencyclopedic. List down which of the following content removed from here is from a non RS source please. 86.96.128.4 (talk) 19:11, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Since there is no reply to the above by any of the reverters for over a week, it is presumed that the original content can be restored, and those who are interested in making further edits can reason each edit here before making wholesale removal of content and refs 86.96.226.13 (talk) 07:32, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, three editors have just said that your edits haven't contributed any value to the article, they add completely unreliable and unencyclopaedic content in. I've reverted again. -SpacemanSpiff 07:38, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits by IP 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Chembai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070927131942/http://www.sangeetnatak.com/programmes_recognition&honours_music_carnatic_vocal.html to http://www.sangeetnatak.com/programmes_recognition&honours_music_carnatic_vocal.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:30, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Chembai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060610105948/http://chembaismruthi.org:80/ to http://chembaismruthi.org
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070104210611/http://www.cmana.org:80/cmana/articles/gmcm.htm to http://www.cmana.org/cmana/articles/gmcm.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:21, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Chembai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100531154509/http://taal.20m.com/chembai.html to http://taal.20m.com/chembai.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sangeetnatak.com/programmes_recognition%26honours_music_carnatic_vocal.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091114112928/http://www.guruvayurdevaswom.org/chembai.shtml to http://www.guruvayurdevaswom.org/chembai.shtml
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://chembaismruthi.org/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cmana.org/cmana/articles/gmcm.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified