lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cairo Citadel

message: Uh, it says "it's sometimes referred to as the Mohamed Ali Citadel, because it contains the mosque of Mohamed Ali, which was built amost 7 centuries later." Seven centuries later than what? It never says when it was originally built, and therefore it's baffling to consider what the "7 centuries later" could be referring to. Hmmmmm382 01:22, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Romanization of قلعة صلاح الدين needed in lead. Badagnani (talk) 01:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanization needed 

message: I've just expanded the history section significantly. I have done so with the intention of preserving the existing content and adding to it. Some further editing will surely be needed to refine it. Among other concerns, much of the new text may dwell too long on describing former structures within the Citadel (many of which are historically important, however); I'm open to the idea that new sections could be made for these buildings (not to mention new pages).
It's also heavy on architectural history in general; it could use some more information on major events. Also, some information about what the site of the Citadel is currently used for (tourism, culture, military) might be helpful.
Cheers, Casual Builder (talk) 11:05, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks alot, just incredible! JahlilMA (talk) 12:18, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions (history mostly)
Talk:Eric Ambler

message: Footnote (reference) number 3, that is. I tried to remove it but couln't do so easily.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.237.250.218 (talk) 03:28, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnote reference is an AD and goes no place useful 

message: What work of Ambler's was this movie based on? There's no work by that name listed. The linked page for the movie says it was based on one of his novels. Which? Or is this an error and all he wrote was the movie?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.231.250.255 (talk) 18:45, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect that this is a phantom title--all the mentions of a novel by this title point back to the film credits, and a search of Alibris yields only a book that seems to be about the film. I wonder whether it was an unpublished novel that he turned into a screenplay. I've been reading Ambler for nearly fifty years and haven't come across this book. RLetson (talk) 06:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Later: A brief mention in Chapter 12 of Here Lies confirms that this was an original screenplay. If there was a novel behind it, it was never published, and Ambler does not mention any such. (In the same chapter he does mention an unhappy experience with adapting his own work but does not specify the piece in question.) I will edit the entry to remove the suggestion that October Man was a novel first. RLetson (talk) 18:12, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The October Man?
Talk:Battle of Crête-à-Pierrot

message: , take a look at this. The material needs to be distanced with more different wording. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:53, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll reword the article. It appears that this is an example of the material being in the article before I expanded it (or rather, added references and a bit) - I'm being more careful with what I now work on in the contest. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 21:59, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok - please just run all your articles through Earwig's copyvio detector. It's true that some older wikipedia material has boomeranged around the net as well, but it becomes a real headache trying to assess this. Just try and make sure that there are no slabs of text in common. Don't worry, I am checking all entries, not singling you out. Cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. On another note, it doesn't seem like you've posted on the talk page of First Merkel cabinet but mentioned that you would on the contest page. I ran a check and it brings up the mirrors 1 and 2. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 22:24, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

text:  I've been through all my entries. Mucous membrane has one mirror and one site attributing text from Wikipedia. Jamaica, Land We Love brings up the lyrics of the national anthem, which can't really be replaced. Province of Matera has one site attributing Wikipedia text. Pope Romanus has one mirror. Albania at the Olympics has one mirror. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 22:41, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Great. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:02, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite
Talk:Battle of Ravine-à-Couleuvres

message: And this not much overlap here but a little tweaking needed Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:55, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw this one. To me, that site looks somewhat like a mirror and using its search tool, I located this (different URL but exactly the same layout, and the other site contains a link at the top of the home page linking to this site). That page is a mirror of the Wikipedia article and outlines this. What do you think? Thine Antique Pen (talk) 22:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Aargh I hate all this mirroring....ok. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 22:11, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Mirroring
Talk:Germanophile

message: I thought this topic concerned people of non-german origin with a particular interest in German culture. So how does it become a part of German culture? Rex 19:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Germanophiles attempt to mimic German culture. Ameise -- chat 19:43, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

text: How can you doubt that? That is the basic definition of that, do you also doubt that pi is 3.141...? Ameise -- chat 01:20, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

text: sigh, this is splitting hairs. Germanophily is "delight in German culture", and as such not part of German culture in the narrow sense. It still makes sence to categorize it under German culture. What is wrong with doing so Rex? "Germany" isn't a terribly descripitive category, and by the same reasoning inapplicable, since Germanophiles are necessarily not part of Germany. dab (ᛏ) 07:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: German culture

message: I would like to suggest that the Etymology of the word "Germanophile" is verification alone for the pages content. I would classify myself as a Germanophile due to my overarching love for Deutscland. Also how do you verify an "Idea". This is like the "God" issue "God" is an Idea in the technical sense. So you can not find reliable sources with which to verify "God" to make an Atheist instantly a Baptist bible thumping person. Same for this "Idea" you capture what a Germanophile would be, and when people who would subscribe to the Germanophile ideology come along they can put in their "First Person" view of what a Germanophile is. Treat this like a religion, people will come along write what they believe, in order to educat others on what a Germanophile is.<BR>
Thanks,<BR>
MKLPTR (talk) 10:02, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Verrification" Error box on top of page 

message: Why is Tim Allen listed on this site?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.145.89.65 (talk) 11:13, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: because some people are idiots. Removed. Badgerpatrol (talk) 15:33, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tim Allen
Talk:Cardiac asthma

message: will a person with this wake up when he cant breath? 80.178.195.85 19:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Often, he/she will. If you don't wake up, then it really can't be considered a symptom. InvictaHOG 21:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Effects

message: Should future edits have some form of emphasis on differentiating alternate respiratory related symptoms of CHF contained within this article? Jrb2022 (talk) 20:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emphasis on differentiating Cardiac Asthma from PND? 

message: My work plan for editing article is as follows. Currently the article is not divided by subsections and headings. I plan to expand the article to include a lead, etiology/characteristic, symptoms, and management sections, as well as update the article to include more direct and concrete explanations of this disease state and its affiliation with congestive heart disease. I believe separating will help with article approachability and readability. I also plan to incorporate additional resources to help elucidate the pathological/physiological mechanisms at work in the presentation. Please provide any feedback that could assist in helping improve the quality of this article.Jrb2022 (talk) 20:16, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work Plan for Editing Article
Talk:General contractor

message: There's an error on this page. It's "co]d" or something similar. I might've changed it, but I have no idea what it's supposed to say. Basemaze (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As part of the WISER project I propose to add the following to help clairfy the definition of a general contractor.
"Involves the optimum use of available funds, the control scope of work, effective project scheduling, the avoidance of delays, changes and disputes, enhancing project design and construction quality, and optimum flexibility in contracting and procurement." Mc2499-njitwill (talk) 03:46, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WISER PROJECT 
Talk:Martyrs' Cemetery

message: It's great that this article is so thoroughly sourced. --Impaciente 22:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, always glad to see work appreciated :) I was lucky though, in fairness, it seems during a one-week span, a slew of journalists decided to cover burials here and write near-identical articles, basically only varying in whether they called it football or soccer, and which epitaph/description to include as an example :) Sherurcij (Speaker for the Dead)  00:19, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Sourcing

message: Don't you think that it is ironic that a slew of journalist release almost identical articles?  And not one single article mentions that mostly insurgents are buried there, or that the civilian deaths may be caused by the insurgents themselves.  Or that every article is decidely 'anti-American'.  One article you referenced (#1) is even an Editorial Article (no POV there).  Yet another article is incorrectly cited (#11).  You state that a young Omar was killed, whereas the article states it was his older insurgent brother who was.  
There was a makeshift graveyard made in the main cemetery in Fallluja in 2004.  However, in Arabic, a martyrs cemetery is roughly  the same as our veterans cemetery.  Virtually every town over here has one.  After asking around for nearly four months, the residents here in Falluaja can only identify one 'martyrs cemetery'.  It is located north of Fallujah, and has had no one buried in it for more than 125 years.  From this and other Wiki contributions regarding Iraq, I understand the author's  position; as long as it is in print somewhere, then it is the truth, regardless of what is happening on the ground.  It seems that you have become yet another sheep to the propaganda put out by insurgents in the form of 'NEWS'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angncon (talk • contribs) 11:26, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable Sources
Talk:Shakespearean comedy

message: King Lear is clearly a tragedy, is in the Shakespearean tragedy list, is classified as a tragedy on the First Folio page and on its own page. I have not found a single article, Wikipedia or otherwise, that claims that it is a comedy. I have removed it from the comedy list. --AnotherNaturalOne (talk) 09:37, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: King Lear

message: Removed some vandalism 86.135.177.213 19:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandal

message: The bulleted list has several plays with asterisks appended to them, but there are no footnotes to explain their meaning. The creator of the asterisks should fix that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mherr (talk • contribs) 00:42, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The notes were  and have now been restored. --Joshua Issac (talk) 15:13, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The bulleted list 

message: I do not know what the source for calling this a comedy is but having seen the play I can assume you that it is a tragedy. The who point of the play is the intense rivalry between the two men once best friends who fall in love with the same woman and end up fighting to the death over her. Not many laughs in that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reesmf (talk • contribs) 21:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noble Kinsmen
Talk:Jean-Pierre Boyer

message: Why was he overthrown? By whom? This should be explained --AW (talk) 20:13, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overthrown? 

message: The quality of this article is far from being a C-Class. So, I have changed it to "Start," which is more appropriate. Much of the information here is poorly researched. Moreover, it needs work with the prose, and in finding some cohesiveness. Please, help!Historian (talk) 17:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality
Talk:Next Level Games

message: I have been watching BNN and on the special it was said that Next Level Games is working on a game for Nintendo. 16:32 EST October 2nd 2008 Gursagar Sekhon  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.150.85 (talk) 20:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Series 

message: Professionalism, craftsmanship and collaboration are the core values at Next Level Games.
Sounds like an advert  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.11.50.20 (talk) 11:14, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: Yesterday, Nintendo now fully owns Next Level Games.  Now, please edit the article on Next Level Games.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MonadoBoy16 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nintendo now owns Next Level Games 

message: You forgot to add Donkey Kong Country Returns & Tropical Freeze as those were also developed by Next Level Games. GuyUser81 (talk) 19:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donkey Kong
Talk:The Virgin of Zesh

message: : ... the fourth book of his Viagens Interplanetarias series and the third of its subseries of stories set on the fictional planet Krishna. Chronologically it is the fifth Krishna novel.
The word chronologically is not much help on its own: internal or external chronology?  Is it the third published and the fifth according to the fictional history of Krishna, or vice versa? —Tamfang (talk) 07:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  chronology
Talk:Deshabhimani

message: Deleted some names from the list of those who contributed to the growth of Deshabhimani. I dare to delete because, am sure there are more important persons who contributed much. Deleted names include those who left the Paper seeking newer greeneries. Names of very junior journalists,who are at present with the paper also is deleted. I don't think it is good to use Wiki as a place for self procclamation.Sajeevdbi 21:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Edited this article on January 26, 2009. Removed some uncertain, irrelevant allegations. Editors are requested to add only facts but not personal opinions to the article. Added Subtitles 'History', 'Supplements' and 'Publications' Aravind V R (talk) 15:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Added content
Talk:The Financial Express (India)

message: 3 issues are mentioned in a Mar'15 review, but the discussion seems unavailable on the talk page.
- This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. (March 2015)
- This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. (March 2015)
- This article needs additional citations for verification. (March 2015)
All 3 issues still seem to exist in the article, which needs a comprehensive rewrite to comply with AD and CS. Does anyone have relevant background for the same? Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.1.208.98 (talk) 11:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addressing issues with article
Talk:The Chessmen of Mars

message: Quote:
The Chessmen of Mars introduces the Kaldanes of Bantoom. Their form is almost all head but for six vestigial legs and a pair of Chelae. 
Analysis:
The word "vestigial" is wrong, as the creature's legs are functional in spiderlike fashion.WHPratt (talk) 17:12, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

message: I added an external link to my blog page that is only intended to make available a better formated version of the book. Since no other reasonably formated version of the book is linked here and therefore easily available to the reader of the article, I believe that this link actually is complying with the scope of wikipedia - making information available to everyone. Please let me know your opinion and accept my apologies if I am wrong and let me know what better way is to make the epub version of the book easily available to everyone. I am new to wikipedia. RC87 (talk) 20:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to erb2ebook.blogspot.com
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Jusjih

message: Total edits	5294
Distinct pages edited	3866
Average edits/page	1.369
First edit	09:32, 8 September 2003
	
(main)	3293
Talk	210
User	133
User talk	538
Image	88
Image talk	5
Template	43
Template talk	18
Help	2
Category	43
Category talk	2
Wikipedia	864
Wikipedia talk	54
Portal talk	1
Jusjih's editcountitis information using Interiot's tool --Alex (Talk) 19:41, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jean-François Papillon

message: I've seen sources (have to find them) in which he is called Jean François Papillon.  Is there a reason why no surname is used here?--Parkwells (talk) 16:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: The article erroneously states that Spain disavowed it’s Sainte Domingan (Haitian) generals and soldiers.
There were numerous black and mixed race units in the Spanish provincial (not colonial) military establishment.  The other General, Jorge Bissou, and his soldiers, were destined to La Florida.  And became part of the garrison ( indeed, Bissou commanded it) of Fort Mose (Our Lady of Mose), just north of present day St Augustine, FL.
But returning to Papillon. The article states that his unit was thrown out of Cadiz in 1813.  In 1813, Spain was still fighting the War of Independence (Peninsular War, for the Brits), and governed by the junta located precisely at Cadiz.  The article states that Papillon’s soldiers were sent to the Coast of the Flies. That would be the west of Africa, where no Spanish presence appeared yet.  A more likely instance would be of them to have been sent to Miskitia in the east coast of Nicaragua.  There, the current population shows an admixture of native Indian and African blood, which might be explained by a Sainte Domingan presence.  Fly in Spanish is Mosca, mosquito could be either the same word or Mosco, referring to the larger biting sandflies, and causing a confusion in terms.  Just one theory. 2601:347:C000:1CA0:69A4:D64C:E1F5:FA15 (talk) 17:47, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible connection.
Talk:T. Nelson Downs

message: I just found out that he was my great uncle not a lie 173.27.202.123 (talk) 15:47, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi 

message: Yay 2600:1014:B152:2920:D2A:8486:7629:C0E0 (talk) 15:54, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I edited the citation:)
Talk:Vincent Ogé

message: Vincent Ogé and Jacques Vincent Ogé appear to be the same person - at least they have the same birth dates. It is confusing.  Mattisse 17:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal - same person? 

message: #2 is incorrect, as that page has nothing about the father of Oge, but says his mother had a coffee plantation outside town. I'm changing it.--Parkwells (talk) 22:25, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect footnote
Talk:Hellmann–Feynman theorem

message: > Please see Wikipedia is not a textbook and rephrase to eliminate "we" and "us"'s
As far as I can tell, the part that refers to the use of "we" and "us"'s has been done. Can anyone give some advice on the remaining items? Finq (talk) 05:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Finq. The problems have been addressed apparently, a good article results, and as there is no ongoing discussion, i think i may remove the related template. Thank you, Hansmuller (talk) 18:04, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Maintenance Message?
Talk:Casilda of Toledo

message: Is she a real person or a legend.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by IslamicrevialistmMujahid (talk • contribs) 02:02, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Linda Martín Alcoff

message: From web page http://www.alcoff.com: "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License."  ... discospinster talk 19:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

message: I've added lots of content here and secondary sources.  I removed the line at the bottom about this being a stub.  Could someone remove the box at the top that says this lacks secondary sources?Chrisclaire88 (talk) 18:33, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: No Longer a Stub?
Talk:North Carolina's congressional districts

message: New map as of Feb 2016
bit.ly/21eGiPB
^ That link doesn't work any more.  Here is the new one http://www.ncsbe.gov/webapps/redistrict/uscongmaps.html Edward Staplerhands (talk) 18:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

message: To echo the users above, this page has become outdated after the redistricting of 2016. The Elections of 2016 followed the new boundaries, not the ones showed here for each district. If someone knows how to update this, please do so. The first map encompassing the whole state is the correct one, it's the individual district maps that are outdated. 
http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2015E1/Bills/Senate/PDF/S2v4.pdf
http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2015E1/Bills/House/PDF/H2v5.pdf
On June 2 2016 the courts upheld the new boundaries.
TomasMFC (talk) 22:46, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Updating Needed

message: A new map for the 2020 elections has been put into place, as can be seen in this WFAE article, WFAE being a Charlotte-based radio and news station. These maps are expected to be used in 2020, and so the article and maps, as well as articles about each congressional district, need to be updated, as they have not been updated since 2018. Builder018 (talk) 20:25, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further updating required
Talk:Old Town Square

message: St. Nicholas' Church is NOT in Old Town Square. It is in Malostranksa Namesti (Lesser Town Square).— Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.83.103.73 (talk) 22:12, 19 October 2006
: There are more St. Nicholas' Churches in Prague, one is one Old Town Square, one one Lesser Town Square. --Jklamo 20:49, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: One is in Lesser Town - St. Nicholas Church (Malá Strana), second is in Old Town Square - St. Nicholas Church (Staré Město) and third is in Vršovice - St. Nicholas Church (Vršovice). Jirka.h23 (talk) 06:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: --> 'because for respect' is bad English grammar.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.35.35.42 (talk) 15:49, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar