lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Petrojet SC

message: Petrojet is the name of the oil-company. So we should havePetrojet for the company and Petrojet (football team) or Petrojet SC for the footbal team. Or the other way, Petrojet (company) for the company. Or what do you think?--TheEgyptian 10:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  I prefer Petrojet SC, unless that is an incorrect name. Jogurney 15:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-naming 

message: I do not think this list is an appropriate list. It looks to me like a list of all who played or playing for Petrojet. So, I propose the following: 
1- I created a category that list all Petrojet players (now and before): :Category:Petrojet players. 
2- I think the current list of notable players should only include former players who had a significant role at the club. I suggest the following modifications:
*   Ahed Abdel Majeed "2009-Now" (still playing for the club)
*  Ahmed Fekri El Sogher "2003-2005" (Not sure if he had a significant role ?)
*   Ahmed Shaaban "2006-Now" (still playing for the club)
*   Al-Sayed Hamdy "2008-Now"  (still playing for the club)
*  Alaa Ibrahim "2004-Now" (He recently transferred to Ittesalat)
*  Eric Bekoe "2009-Now"  (still playing for the club)
*  Khaled Bebo "2006-2008"  (If I remember correctly, Bebo was injured through out his entire career at Petrojet and therefore did not play a significant role)
*  Mahmoud Abdel Hakim "2006-2010"
*  Medhat Abdel Hady "2006-2007"  (only one year at the club and did not contribute much.
*  Mohamed Farouk "2007-2009"  (same as Bebo & Abdel Hady)
*  Mohamed Koffi "2006-Now"  (still playing for the club)
*  Mohamed Shaaban "2008-2010"
*   Osama Mohamed "2006-Now"  (still playing for the club)
*  Ramy Said "2008-2009" (I do not remember that he had an important role at the club)
*   Samir Kamouna  "2006-2007" (Same as Bebo & Abdel Hady)
*  Said Saad "2006-2007" (Do not remember him?)
*  Tarek Mostafa "2006-2007" (Not an important role)
*  Walid Soliman "2006-2010"
As a conclusion, I think the list should only include the following:
*  Alaa Ibrahim: 2004-2010
*  Mahmoud Abdel Hakim: 2006-2010
*  Mohamed Shaaban 2008-2010
*  Walid Soliman: 2006-2010
I will not change this section until it is discussed here. -Osa osa 5 (talk) 21:25, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   Notable players
Talk:Pitch (film)

message: This is the same content as Pitch (filmmaking) and should be merged.  Xtzou (Talk) 23:16, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The content is not the same.  Pitch (film) is a 1997 documentary film, and pitch (filmmaking) is about a presentation approach related to filmmaking. Erik (talk | contribs) 17:06, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Pentium E

message: this page looks a bit iffy. Does anyone need to clean it up?
:Cleaned up and expanded to some extent.
:Should this be merged into the Intel Pentium article, given that it is a continuation of that brand? 59.92.185.238 02:54, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, looks like all the different Pentium * processors have their own pages. 59.92.185.238 02:56, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Makes sense. Moved to Pentium E. —Observ 16:09, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:First Czechoslovak Republic

message: The sentence regarding the borders does not make sense.  There were more Germans in the Republic than Slovaks (3.2 million to 2 million)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.34.48.80 (talk) 21:45, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politics (2nd paragraph) 

message: I would query the statement in the opening paragraph that states, "After 1933 Czechoslovakia remained the only functioning democracy in eastern Europe as other eastern European states had authoritarian or autocratic regimes leading them" on the basis that it was not until 1945(-ish) that Czechoslovakia was considered to be in Eastern rather than Central Europe (Mitteleuropa). As a result I have amended the statement. Cripipper (talk) 18:23, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastern Europe? 

message: I propose to mention that the official name of the First Czechoslovak Republic in Czech language was - as far as I can remember - "Republika československá" - similar to "République francaise" (correct spelling with a cédille now not possible), and not the other way round. --Zbrnajsem (talk) 10:08, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Republika československá 

message: Hey, I suggest to put a contemporary map of Europe into the article instead of that one, it will be much better than viewing non existing countries in current Europe. What do you think?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dakur (talk • contribs) 09:49, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contemporary map? 

message: On article is whrite that Czechoslovak republic had 2 athems but Czechoslovak republic had 1 athem: Kde domov můj a Nad Tatrou sa blýska [Where is my home? and Lightning over the Tatras]. Where is my home? and Lightning over the Tatras was combination Czech and Slovak athem. Dr. Ivan Kučera (talk) 17:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Athem of Czechoslovakia

message: Czechoslovakia was one of the world's 10 most industrialized states. That´s a myth.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:1028:83AC:4586:E063:D145:5686:FB20 (talk) 07:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Bohemia was one of the first industrialized areas in Europe. There mostly everything happened the first time. Kingdom, Industrialization and so on. And there again the Borderlands had a very high density of industry and also tourism. So if not Czechoslovakia was it, it were the old countries of the Bohemian crown. Or Bohemia, Moravia and Bohemian Silesia. Useless to mention, that the Prussian robbed Silesia was till Maria Theresa also Part of Bohemia. 14:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: IP comment
Talk:Ottokar Sevcik

message: It may be so that his first name is spelled with one "t" (Otokar) instead of two.  04:36, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Otakar Ševčík is his article, thus Ottokar Sevcik is merely a later biography.  A merger is called for.  GhostofSuperslum 17:47, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  According to Grove, his surname is Ševčík and his first name is Otakar.  The primary article should reflect the correct spelling.  JackofOz 04:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: His name in Wikipedia
Wikipedia talk:Newbie tests

message: User:Alan.ca provided no evidence or comment on the NPOV of this page. Uh. Not sure what to do about that. Cipherswarm 04:37, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that it's in the WP: namespace we can't really use  which is meant for articles. – Chacor 04:43, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I have reverted the merge. The Deletion policy page is not really a suitable home for detailed information about what amounts to a subset of one speedy deletion criterion (CSD G2). I have tagged the page as an essay. – Black Falcon (Talk) 18:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ernie Fields

message: The correct date is August 28, 1904.  As well as being set out in the Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History & Culture, it's confirmed by the 1904 date on his gravestone here, and by his Social Security records, SSN 444-16-8913.  I don't know how they are accessed in the US, but I can access them via an Ancestry.com subscription here.  It's also confirmed by his family at the Ancestry site, and in this edit.  That information is also the source of his full name. Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch, thanks for noticing the discrepancy. --Arxiloxos (talk) 17:20, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 
Talk:Takydromus sexlineatus

message: This is a synonym of Takydromus khasiensis?--Cheers! (talk) 14:13, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  synonyms
Talk:Ron Powers

message: ++Lar: t/c 13:45, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article was selected for [[WP:DYK|DYK]]! 

message: Seems like a reasonable thing to include in an article on a well-known writer... if the info's available. 150.243.112.7 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 12:39, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education
Talk:Thornapple River

message: see http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=thornapple+river+Michigan+watershed&btnG=Google+Search for more info ++Lar: t/c 04:49, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: Citation 25, that cites https://www.barrycd.org/home/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/TRWMP-1.pdf is dead.  JSk.or1 (talk) 11:03, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link in Citations
Talk:William H. P. Blandy

message: Maybe the infamous quotation ending with "I am not an atomic playboy" should be mentioned. 83.236.128.138 17:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't there be a redirect from "Spike Blandy"? Personally, I never think of him as "William".  Trekphiler 12:10, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Call me [[James Marsters]]
Talk:Kunti

message: (heading added 8 Jan 2007, together with the move to Kunti request)
Why is does Kunti have the title Queen? This is like changing Rama to King Rama and Krishna and Lord Krishna. GizzaChat © 04:52, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah.  it's weird.  Move it back.--D-Boy 10:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Queen Kunti is specifically known as such in the Puranas - I was thinking the article name identified her from other people also named Kunti that might warrant an article in future. I wouldn't have said it was honorific as in Lord Krishna or Sri Rama? Ys, Gouranga(UK) 19:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the Sanskrit word for queen? Is it Rani (I know it is Raja for king) like in Hindi? And is that word always mentioned with Kunti in all the Puranas that talk about her? If so, it may be okay. Otherwise we later on move this page to "Kunti (Mahabharata)" Even Krishna in the Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam is referred to commonly as Shribhagawan, Ishvara (Supreme Personality of Godhead!) just as Arjun is called Kaunteya (son of Kunti). Some devotees of Krishna might use another name of his more often like Gopal or Govind. GizzaChat © 09:03, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've checked in the Sanskrit and it just says 'kunti' in all the instances I could find. I'm thinking of Prabhupada's books where he almost exclusively prefixes her name with the title of queen or describes her as Kuntidevi. This does lean towards it being more of an honorific title. Your idea of having Kunti (Mahabharata) sounds like a good one for the future, if the need arises, or Kunti (Pandavas) or similar? Cheers, Gouranga(UK) 21:40, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Agreed. Change it back. There is no significant scope for confusion, not enough to warrant a disamb page, let alone the prefix. Imc 10:29, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm also in agreement on moving the current article to Kunti. Regards, Gouranga(UK) 14:24, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - Looks fairly non-controversial to me. -146.186.210.78 20:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move / discussion of title

message: Kumhariya is the village situated in the east of City Amroha 20km. Kumhariya has many problem in the village like many people are Unemplyoyed and Poor farmer.  Vksrkh (talk) 04:28, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kumhariya Amroha Uttar Pradesh 
Talk:Big Biz Tycoon! 2

message: Of course my opinion doesn't apply to the article, but this game is terrible and I hope no one else wastes their money on it.  Since no quick/easy way comes to mind for me to neutrally impart this information into the article, I state it baldly here.  Khono (talk) 18:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion of the Game
Talk:Kinnara

message: Kinnari is, as far as I know, just the feminine version of Kinnara, so I think they should be merged. Kotengu 05:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've merged the two articles and tried to keep most of the information intact. Anything that was overlapping, I removed. And I move some things around to make the article flow smoother. It's still an unsourced article, so I don't know if all the information there is accurate. I hope I did well with the merge. If not, it can always be edited again. --Cantharellus 15:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: Here's my concern.  Laszlo Legeza, "Tantric Elements in Pre-Hispanic Gold Art," Arts of Asia, 1988, 4:129-133. 
Why we have to sacrifice  the quality of the sources? just  because some of us where sort of... Afraid to a Sock?  (Kufarhunter (talk) 03:23, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Kufarhunter Because you're not supposed to be editing, you're blocked, remember?? (N0n3up (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Philippines
Talk:Aftershave

message: The below link gives the recipe for Aftershave
--------------------
Who gives a shit about the different brands that are out there??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.189.174.87 (talk) 19:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, that site is only a few months old - it took this article, mostly word for word. Neıl ☎ 16:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mall of America Tycoon

message: Thank you for uploading :Image:Mall of America Tycoon Box.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content.  This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 15:38, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Mall of America Tycoon Box.jpg
Talk:Playboy: The Mansion

message: The link to the Official website doesn't go anywhere.  Also, the game itself gives a different address, which also doesn't go anywhere.  Is there an official website anymore?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Durmgrid (talk • contribs) 07:11, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Site Link 

message: This list is getting silly, to be frank. It is too long and in its current form adds little to the article. Fences and windows (talk) 03:42, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  And nothing in the list is cited. Unless there's a good reason to keep it, I think it should be trimmed down to a few names and folded into the prose possibly.  Dismas|(talk) 04:10, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I trimmed it down to the first six entries.  It would be nice if these could be referenced...  Dismas|(talk) 23:23, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Celebrity guest appearances
Talk:Capdown

message: Giving User:ShadowHalo the chance to describe his actions properly.  Looking through your contribs shows quite the disregard for uniformity when nominating ska band articles for deletion.  The AAA, Allstonians, Aggravators, in fact almost all of your previous ska edits have no more information than is contained within the Capdown article.  Explain yourself anytime.Btl 05:25, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion Nonsense 

message: A friend showed me the site that I quoted(citation number 10). He says its a reliable source of information for that sort of thing. I will leave it up to the admins to decide whether it is a reliable source or not, but I hope it helps. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 19:06, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Citation 
Talk:Matt Maiellaro

message: Maiellaro announced he was leaving Adult Swim. Unfortunately I think the only "official" source for this information is the post he made on Adult Swim's message board. --99.186.111.95 (talk) 02:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adult Swim Departure 

message: The redirect Comedian Matt "Crag Hartin Fan Club" Maiellaro has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 05:37, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Comedian Matt "Crag Hartin Fan Club" Maiellaro]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The article this part cites doesn't mention him ever leaking it onto Youtube? The most it says is that the episode was produced, then leaked by someone who had access to it. Ohixsts (talk) 01:50, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Boston"
Talk:Compsognathidae

message: Add the reference below to this page:
Hwang, S. H., Norrell, M. A., Qiang, J., Keqin, et. G. 2004. A large compsognathid from the Early Cretaceous Yixian Formation of China. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 2(1):13-30.
The cladistic analysis in this paper recovered Compsognathidae within Maniraptora. 72.194.116.63 15:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Compsognathidae related to Avialae?
Talk:List of notable bridges

message: This article was split off from Bridge per a consensus on the talk page. Previous edit history can be found there.--Kchase T 05:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Origins of this list

message: This article should be merged with List of bridges because the two articles cover precisely the same territory.  The pictures and descriptions here could add value to the list in the other article.--DRTïllberġTalk 03:23, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've merged everything from this list to List of bridges, apart from bridges that wouldn't be added to List of bridges anyway such as UK and US bridges which have their own lists. Saikokira 05:00, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Those bridges in country lists should also be merged in to their individual lists to complete the merge. TerriersFan 23:36, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger with [[List of bridges]]
Talk:Morrison Formation

message: If the Morrison Formation is dated from 155 Ma to 147 Ma then it must have ended at 147 Ma not 155 Ma. Also the NPS website (http://www.nps.gov/archive/dino/morrison.htm) for Dinosaur National Monument states that deposition ended 147 Ma. The NPS site also says that the unconformity lasted 15 Ma to 20 Ma not 30 Ma. Dr. Morbius 00:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now added - thank you! J. Spencer 04:47, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrected dating of the end of deposition of the Morrison Formation 

message: I've noticed the table titled "Placeholders of the Placeholder Formation" remains unfilled and has been like that since July 19th. Is anyone going to edit it or can I go ahead and fill it in?Smokeybjb (talk) 01:06, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want to, I'd say go ahead. J. Spencer (talk) 01:16, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

text: It either needs filling in or deletion, rather ugly and pointless as is. Vsmith (talk) 01:21, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Update Table

message: Whatever happened to the table titled "Reptiles of the Morrison Formation"? Should it be readded, or should there be seperate tables for turtles, crocodilians, sphenodonts, e.t.c.? Smokeybjb (talk) 03:21, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Paleobiota of the Morrison Formation Abyssal (talk) 14:50, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reptiles of the Morrison Formation

message: I don't know that it is accurate to say "Insects were very similar to modern species, with termites building 30 m (100 ft.) tall nests". Termites, yes, OK, but could the the hymenoptera, diptera, beetles be described as very similar? Almost all the lepidoptera evolved in the Upper Cretaceous, parallel to flowering plants. And you don't really mean "species", or do you? I would have thought "order" or "family" was more like it. Just what were the insects found in the Morrison Formation? Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:59, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insects 
Talk:Tejedor (band)

message: I prepared this stub article on Dec. 17, 2006... just a few seconds after the article's creation, I note that it has been proposed for speedy deletion on grounds that it is about a group and the article does not state why the group is notable. I have read the guidelines for speedy deletion and they state that limited content is not a sufficient reason for speedy deletion if the amount of material submitted is sufficient to be a stub article. The final sentence, supported by the external links, assert correctly that Tejedor is a group reknown in the international Celtic music scene and has won awards at the music festival in Lorient, France (a major international musical event). It is demostrable that the tejedor article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion.--Lazloholifeld 05:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Crazy for You (TV series)

message: This article is very POV and looks like most of it was copied-and-pasted off the ABS-CBN website.
*I've removed the offending material from the article. - Mgm|(talk) 11:36, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy-paste

message: We need to sit down and get the information about the entire serie and narrate it here . Winfred Sarah (talk) 19:58, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crazy for you.The information about the entire serie.
Talk:Jack Reilly (artist)

message: Imagemodern, this article is about the Australian football (soccer) player. If you want to make an article about the American artist of the same name, please start a new article, and add a disambiguation lines at the start of the article. Blackmissionary 05:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorted out now. Blackmissionary 23:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
File talk:ROC Administrative and Claims.jpg

message: Just looked at the CIA world factbook, which mentions nothing about mongolia or tannu tuva being claimed by the ROC. Where did you get this information? --147.134.45.64 17:00, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

message: then, china surrounded by all enenmy country? mongol is part of china? most world do not think, so. if your country continue to claim this, then ROC will be deprive their rights from UN. "and claimed by ROC, administered by afghanistan." does not seen is this picture. where is that place?Hyundaiboy 09:14, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A tiny lime green dot at the bottom of the Afghanistan-administered area. --Howard the Duck 06:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The Republic of China (Taiwan) has not constitutionally renounced sovereignty over Outer Mongolia, although Article 3 of the Enforcement Rules for the Act Governing Relations between Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, effective from 30 January 2002, has been amended to exclude Outer Mongolia from the Mainland Area (defined as areas under control of the Chinese Communists after the amendement) to treat it as de facto foreign territory.
So, the border between the "Mongolian Area" and the "Mainland Area" (Sinkiang, Kansu,..., Hsingang) should be exactly on the border between the red area and the blue area. Temur 05:09, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  if this picture is true 

message: These two island groups are claimed by both PRC and ROC. --seav (talk) 14:57, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind... I saw the small print at the bottom of the map. --seav (talk) 14:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are the Spratlys and Paracel Islands? 

message: Could someone put these borders on a world map like this: 
SpencerCS (talk) 05:09, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I was wondering 

message: I remembered there was a PNG version of this map; does anyone know where it is? Or did I remember incorrectly? I thought there was a non-JPG version. -- 李博杰  | —Talk contribs  05:06, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  PNG/JPEG