lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The World Tomorrow (radio and television)

message: An IP editor just added the claim to the intro "In 2004, a new version of The World Tomorrow television program began production." with three misformed links to Denver Open Media. The problems with this are:
*Denver Open Media, a public access TV site, is not a reliable source
*None of the pages linked to give a 2004 date
*I looked far enough into the second one to see that it's a Herbert Armstrong piece, and as HWA was quite dead by 2004 and I've seen no sign that he's gotten better since, this was not a new production. It may have been new tags slammed onto an old production, but that doesn't make it a new production any more than the removal of the Billy Joel theme song from reruns of Bosom Buddies made them new productions.
*The introduction is for summaries of content in the article body, which this is not.
I am trying to maintain my retirement from article editing. Could someone review this new addition and, if they find similarly to me, revert it? --Nat Gertler (talk) 19:31, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: And now they're edit-warring in the material, but switching "2004" to "in recent years"... as though 2004 still qualifies as a recent year (babies who were born that year are now legal adults for most purposes.) No new sources have been given to show when these episodes were produced, to whatever extend they are new productions. --Nat Gertler (talk) 20:09, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I'm concerned, those "sources" do not support "a new version" regardless of any of the above.  They just seem to be random videos and say nothing of detail suggesting a "reboot" IMO. ButlerBlog (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I requested partial-protection be applied. ButlerBlog (talk) 20:40, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New 2004 claim 

message: The title card currently shown in the infobox is not the ideal example; it is clearly from a post-2003 version/rerun/series of the same title/whatever. I don't know if a pre-1994 item is available with rights cleared (and I don't feel like reviewing what-we're-allowed-to-use-at-low-res at the moment.) I know this title card was a subject for hassle in the past, although I was not involved in that. --Nat Gertler (talk) 18:02, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title card
Talk:Area

message: I think it would be prudent to embolden or italicize the word "are" used as a noun that is the archaic term for hectare and pronounced with a long 'a' sound. Perhaps even prelude it with the formal definition before using it in a sentence. Steph6n (talk) 16:42, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "are" in plain text really threw me off
Talk:Organic composition of capital

message: Jim, how would it be if you removed your qualification on c:v from the introductory paragraph, and subsequently spelled-out what alternative accounts of organic composition exist in the Marxian literature? Otherwise this seems to me to muddy the waters too much. Adhib 08:55, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 1

message: I'm also a bit puzzled by the removal of my link to Grossmann. The 'four variables' no longer makes much sense. What was the reasoning behind removing it? What should I be looking out for if I want to reinstate it? Adhib 17:06, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 2

message: What has this autonomist stuff have to do with a basic definition of Marx's concept? (JB)
:The Processed World group heavily argued capital composition in relation to white collar and service labours.Fifelfoo 03:26, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 3

message: Isn't there an error in this paragraph:
Marx argues that a rising organic composition of capital is a necessary effect of capital accumulation and competition in the sphere of production, at least in the long term. This means that the share of constant capital in the total capital outlay increases, and that labor input per product unit declines. Ultimately, a rising OCC must depress the rate of profit.
Surely a higher organic composition of capital means more labour, less capital. Should it not be falling?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.195.14.1 (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 4

message: Hmm, user "201.141.63.50" seems to have gratuitously and without comment changed the chapter number at the start of text (from 25 to the incorrect 23) . I changed it back but I'm assuming people will want to watch for this kind of BS. Just so you'll know. 2602:306:C434:2F00:2A0:D1FF:FE94:A6AB (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled 5

message: The scam editor Bob Rayner User:Bobrayner specializes in cutting large bits out of articles that he doesn't like, for no reason at all or for some spurious reason. He doesn't understand anything about the subjectmatter. The article then has to be reset to what is was before his vandalism. This article is still being worked on from time to time and Rayner's destructive habits are unwanted here. Jurriaan (talk) 19:23, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Beware of Bob Rayner's "editing"

message: If the "organic" composition of capital refers to how some of it is made up of "living" labor, why is the amount of living labor inversely proportional to the "organic" composition of capital as a whole?  Is that really what it refers to, or is it just how, in Marx's opinion, capital has an "organic" tendency to become less..."organic"? Esszet (talk) 00:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organic - live vs. dead?
Talk:Aleksey Fyodorovich Orlov

message: This page was previously a redirect to a different Alexei Orlov (Aleksey Grigoryevich Orlov -earlier than Alexei Orlov). The only link to this page refers to this later Orlov. It has hence, been changed from a redirect to an actual article (stub). Aggelophoros 09:09, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Talk:List of Metro-North Railroad stations

message: This list should be reformatted. I recommend putting everything in alphabetical order, and using charts that include the lines and former railroads that used the stations, much like I tried to do with the SEPTA Regional Rail stations before somebody else beat me to that list. And in cast you forgot, yes, I said the same thing about List of New Jersey Transit stations, and I still feel the same way. -------User:DanTD (talk)  03:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: All that's needed is to fix up the ADA tags. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  19:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reformat this list
Talk:List of beaches

message: The "China Beach" entry under Vietnam links to the TV show "China Beach" instead of an article about the actual beach.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.128.8.150 (talk) 13:51, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vietnam Error 

message: Hi. This list must be split into list by country. I'm going to create List of beaches in Spain by now. emijrp (talk) 13:54, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: But of course, leave here the most important beaches for every country, and links with  template to the list by country. emijrp (talk) 13:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Reply  - I think that we can start by splitting this list into continents, then splitting into countries from there if needed. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:14, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: All the countries with enough beaches on the list should be split into country lists. Lists by continent could be used for countries with not enough beaches for a country list.--Cattus talk 21:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split in lists by country 

message: Hello, I have reduced all photos to a maximum of 500px as I believe this should be the standard, if you want to make your own page for your country please feel free however there seemed to be a photo war of sorts happening.  Please post any discussions below for this topic. Hogie75 12:16, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, well I think it should all be just thumbs, no fix thumbnail sizes. Getting totally rid of photos would not be favourable either. -- Horst-schlaemma (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Power virus

message: I find this concept intriguing. However, I can't find many external sources. The link referenced from the article doesn't actually use the "power virus" term, nor does it actually discuss viral applications of instruction sequences that consume a lot of power.
If the term to describe this kind of program is a neologism, perhaps we should move the article to a more suitable title and make this a redirect. — David Remahl 13:11, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: As noted above in Forkazoo's comment, a power virus does more than just making the processor go to 100% usage. Anssi (talk) 02:07, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:List of Oïl languages

message: It has been proposed that Languages of Oïl be renamed and moved to Langues d'Oïl. Comments and votes on Talk:Languages of Oïl, please, if you're interested. Man vyi 09:08, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: Why does this page exist? The main article Langues d'oïl isn't that long and it already includes a more detailed family tree. It helpfully directs to this page, suggesting that there is "Further information" here. Will this ever be true? The two lists definitely need to be merged before they become completely contradictory. The question is, here or there? CapnPrep 00:37, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?
Talk:Tantulocarida

message: This article is somewhat short on information because this seems to be a small and obscure subclass with very little information out there to be found. There are no pictures available online at all (especially ones without copyright issues). Details about the families are, at this point, virtually nonexistant.
Normally good sources such as the Tree of Life Project have no listing of this subphylum or any of its families, even though they all exist according to its ITIS Standard Report.  ClockworkTroll 13:23, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think that the number of species is 12 rather than 1200. --Xvazquez (talk) 18:14, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of species 

message: If the adult grows as a bud from within the larva, the larva is larger than the adult.  Does it really still deserve the title of world's smallest arthropod?  We're measuring the wrong thing .... unless the measurement we have really    is for the larval stage, and the supposed "adults" are the     size of germ cells. —Soap— 00:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Adult body size
Talk:George Lyttelton, 1st Baron Lyttelton

message: Why this article was originally entitled "George Lyttelton":  baronetcies in the Hanoverian era were somewhat transient.  Since he was the first baron, the title was known after him, but not before, and he spent his whole life as George Lyttelton, with the baronetcy tacked on late.  Would Robert Walpole be more naturally sought by students as Robert Walpole, 1st Earl of Orrery?  Not that I disagree with the move, but there was reason to my choice of article name.  So long as the redirect keeps working (and no other George Lyttelton gets an article that seizes the redirect), we're fine. Geogre 13:51, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: Some one has added a "burial" category, without adding a statement as to his burial to the text, and certainly without providing a reference.  Can this be resolved please?  The text only identifies him as an alumni of Christchurch, Oxford.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That was me. Apologies for the lack of a reference: I'll try to take a picture of the stone, but his tomb is in Christ Church Cathedral. Feel free to remove it in the meantime. I didn't mention it because it didn't really seem relevant to the text, but the category applies. I can add something at the end of the entry if necessary. Phettyplace (talk) 3:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is fine: suitable addition now made.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial 

message: I have a 2nd Ed of "The Beauties of Shakespear" (sic) published in 1757 which is "To the Houourable Sir George Lyttleton, One of the Lords-Commiſſioners of the Treaſury", Does anyone know why the name is now referred to as Lyttelton?
Hippodras (talk) 17:20, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not know.  The use of the spelling Lyttelton has been consistent over a long period, including for the title that George was later given, which implies that it was his preference.  However, this is a counter-intuitive spelling, the spelling Little being expected;  hence frequent misspellings.  I supect that your book has a printer's error.  Another family with the same ultimate ancestry sells the name Littleton (see Baron Hatherton).  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling - Lyttleton vs Lyttelton
Talk:Sed (disambiguation)

message: In response to the reverting of an edit made on the 24th of May. 
"Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita, acronym of an inhereted genetic bone disorder" was added to the list of SED acronyms. This condition is not entirely rare and is always reffered to as "SED". Why this entry was regarded Vandalism I don't know, as the author of the change does in face suffer from this condition.
Maybe it looks more like SDC than SED ?
==== SED 1888 hits ====
* Spondylo epiphyseal dysplasia sed - Google Search finds 97 instances of 'SED'
* Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita sed - Google Search finds 960 instances of 'SED'
* Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia sed - Google Search finds 835 instances of 'SED'
==== SDC 42 hits ====
* Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita sdc - Google Search finds 9 instances of 'SDC'
* Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia sdc - Google Search finds 32 instances of 'SDC'
* Spondylo epiphyseal dysplasia sdc - Google Search finds 1 instances of 'SDC'
... and no, it wasn't I that deleted it.
It's back.
--195.137.93.171 16:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia

message: * Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita sdc - Google Search finds 9 instances of 'SDC'
* Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia sdc - Google Search finds 32 instances of 'SDC'
* Spondylo epiphyseal dysplasia sdc - Google Search finds 1 instances of 'SDC'
... and no, it wasn't I that deleted it.
It's back.
--195.137.93.171 16:11, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SDC 42 hits 

message: Should't all 3 lead directly here ? All 3 do in the URL ... Only searching for SED does, not Sed or sed ! 
--195.137.93.171 17:06, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Non Angli sed angeli. --84.94.36.158 (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  SED, Sed & sed 

message: I would like to add Surface-conduction electron-emitter display often named SED displays.
KaszpiR (talk) 09:30, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions
Talk:Kim Wilkie

message: Hi Adam Carr, you reverted my edits of this page and said "revert wikification of common nouns, which is ugly and contrary to policy" I was wondering if you would be so kind as to link me to the particular policy page where it mentions that this is contrary to policy, as I looked on various pages and couldn't find this exact information. It would help me a great deal and help me save my time and others in the future. :) Thanks for reading.
"A nice thing to do is to drop the note on the Talk page first, and then revert," - 
I have never claimed to be nice. I don't know where the policy pages are but I have been told several times that there is a policy against excessive wikification. But even if there isn't a policy I will revert excessive wikification. Wikifying common words is ugly and distracting to readers. Adam 00:03, 29 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Armed Forces of Ukraine

message: The page needs serious widening and editing. Hope to find time for that. Just for start, I've made some edits using conventional English terms. Later I'll explain them with official Ukrainian names. AlexPU 16:31, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Mariana Mamonova and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Mariana Mamonova until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 21:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mariana Mamonova" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I have added Pakistan in the international arms supplier as it has supplied a major part of Ukraines ammunition needs for its soviet era artillery systems. If theres a requirement for sources, here are some:
Source:https://en.defence-ua.com/industries/pakistani_artilleri_rockets_for_bm_21_grad_mlrs_are_in_use_of_ukrainian_military-6188.html
https://mil.in.ua/uk/news/do-ukrayiny-dostavyly-pakystanski-snaryady-yarmuk/ Pr0pulsion 123 (talk) 08:09, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pakistan as foreign arms supplier 

message: Available and fit numbers are from 2015. Presumably ‘deployed personnel’ is a secret but is there no recent estimate reliable enough for the infobox? Chidgk1 (talk) 09:46, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this still an issue?  There now appears to be a 2023 number of 1,000,000 active personnel in the infobox, does that provide what you want?  Note that while this number has a reasonable source, adding up all the numbers for the branches of the armed forces provides a total of less than 500,000, so there's still a serious issue with personnel numbers.  Warren Dew (talk) 17:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personnel numbers in infobox? 

message: The redirect 3cy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Edward-Woodrow • talk 18:04, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:3cy]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: There appears to be little to no mention of the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, in the history section and also the opening section, despite its clear major significance.
Is there any reason for this? Would like to understand any nuances, before making an edit. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 12:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  There appears to be no mention of the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine?
Talk:Art Gilmore

message: I have created the Art Gilmore page to reference entries under Herbert W. Armstrong and Pirate Radio. At the time I was unable to come up with a date of birth for Art Gilmore. I believe that he is still alive as of September 2004. There are complete listings of his work in television and radio that are available via the Internet. I have added a bried summary of his work under various headings, but maybe an additional listing of all of his radio, television and movie work could also be added under the appropriate paragraph heading. MPLX/MH 16:31, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate
Talk:Heterosis

message: I don't know how many of the uninitiated would understand the reference to heterotic string; I'm guessing it wouldn't be many.  However, the words "hybrid vigour" incite passionate debate in the various animal fancy groups.  "Heterosis" just happens to be the proper term for this phenomenon.  I'm sure no disrespect was meant to string theory, but believe me it's more than just a question of a few stinking dogs, or cats, or horses, or cows, or....Thanks for the chuckle!  Quill 04:30, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding the addition of 'some stinky dogs' 

message: How animals are affected by heterosis 41.210.147.204 (talk) 05:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Causes of heterosis in farm animal
Talk:Transit of German troops through Finland and Sweden

message: The time-line is adopted after http://www.lysator.liu.se/nordic/scn/faq736.html where it's stated that "You are free to quote this page as long as you mention the URL." --Johan Magnus 17:15, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: During [[World War II], the main link between nazi Germany and Italy were by Switzerland's railways.Enormous amounts of food, materials,nazi troops and weapons passed by these railways.There's no article about this fact, in wikipedia.Agre22 (talk) 19:56, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Switzerland also made the same thing

message: Strictly speaking, Finland is not a Scandinavian country, so describing Nazi Germany's armed force's use of its territory is in accurate.  Finish in not a Scandinavian language, and it's not even an Indo-European language.
Of course it is often lumped in with Scandinavia, but that's just plain sloppy.
The proper term is "Nordic countries," although that includes far-away Greenland and the islands between it and Scandinavia proper.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.23.224.120 (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finland is not a Scandinavian country. 

message: is a key term here that perhaps an expert should introduce. Spicemix (talk) 17:41, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:   Permittenttrafik
Talk:Peter L. Berger

message: Peter L. Berger.
Invitation to Sociology
:Yes, but why, and what? If you want to add it to the article, just be bold and do it! -- till we ☼☽ | Talk 19:45, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As one of the most influential sociology books of the 20th century, it seems odd to have next to nothing of the many critiques that have been mounted of the work, either here or in the substantive article on the book itselfActio (talk) 20:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social Construction of Reality 

message: suggests Wikipedia page is remiss for not including his work supporting tobacco industry. -Pengortm (talk) 17:33, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tobacco industry support 

message: In the section entitled "The reality of everyday life" there is a passage that is unclear. The passage "Humans perceive the other in these interactions as more real than they would themselves" needs to be edited and made clearer. Could someone who is more versed in the work of Berger and Luckmann edit the phrasing to make it clearer. Iss246 (talk) 19:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The reality of everyday life
Talk:Offshore Industry Liaison Committee

message: 1. We who?  Wikipedia is not for first person narratives.
2. Why haven't you (they) been asking to enter?
"after a series of criminally irresponsible decisions"
Was someone actually convicted of something or is this just hyperbole?
Please fix this article.  Thanks.
----
Removed : 
:Ronnie McDonald. Not Ronald. Bit of a difference me thinks.
--Jerzy•t 07:43, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled