lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gharo Wind Power Plant

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.accessgrouponline.com/corporate/news.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:22, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:"Babbacombe" Lee

message: Don't reckon that's Peggy in the video, looks like Pat Donaldson to me. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rF2H5iaJoWw
The Sandy Denny pages agree: http://www.sandydennyofficial.com/music/fairport-convention/the-man-they-couldnt-hang/ 84.92.177.115 (talk) 16:31, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentary Tracks Personnel
Talk:Bachata Rosa

message: Hey! Nice article, just had a few questions as I was going through it:
* "Silvestre said that Guerra was not committed to the project after he learned that it would be recorded in bachata." Huh? I thought he was into bachata.
* "Silvestre explained the name of the title by saying that Guerra's bachatas were "rosa [rosy] while mine was red". Threw me off because you have a singular and a plural verb that (I thought) were referring to the same thing. Would it be correct to say "Guerra's bachata was "rosa [rosy] while mine was red"?
* "The lyrics for the song "Bachata Rosa" were inspired by the works of Chilean poet Pablo Neruda in the opening lines." Opening lines of a Neruda poem or of the song?
Regards. Braincricket (talk) 05:43, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, thanks for copy-editing the article! Allow me to answer your question the best I can:
* From this source : It mentions that Guerra was dismayed when he learned that Silvestre's album Quiero andar was in bachata and was not quite fully committed in bachata music until after "Como abeja al panal" was released as a single.
* From the same source above, I just quoted exactly how it was written. 
* The first four lines of the song. I forgot to mention that the name of Neruda's poem is "Book of Questions". Source
Hope this clears any misconceptions. Erick (talk) 08:08, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

text: Done! I incorporated your explanations into the article just now. Cheers. Braincricket (talk) 15:17, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you. Erick (talk) 17:31, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions after a copy edit
Talk:Battle of Pavón

message: The "Porteño vs. Provincians" interpretation is flawed. Some of the most prominent federal leaders (Rosas, Dorrego) were porteños, while some prominent Unitarian leaders were from the Provinces (Sarmiento, Paz, Taboada, Ferré, etc.). 
In other words, regardless of the dominance of Buenos Aires and its Customs House in any Centralist political project, the conflict was not between "porteños" and "provincians" but between two political groupings. 
Salut, --181.95.113.137 (talk) 06:30, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reworded the subsection dealing with this political interpretation to make it more neutral, will remove POV tag in a few days if no furhter comments. Regards, DPdH (talk) 21:41, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV-Section tag 
Talk:Shell Flat

message: I cannot find "Shell Flat" on the AfD pages for August 1st, 2nd or 3rd, so I will just leave my comment here.
(BTW, a link to the correct AfD page would be helpful.)
I support the article deletion, but for reasons somewhat different than the AfD proposer.  In my view, the abandonment of the wind farm project at Shell Flat would be reason to delete the entire section on the Shell Flat Wind Farm, but not the entire article, as the article has another section that deals with "Shell Flat" as a geographic area, having nothing whatsoever to do with the (formerly?) proposed wind farm.  Thus, the abandonment of the wind farm would be insufficient, in and of itself, to support AfD of the entire article.  However, since the single sentence claim in the geographic section about the area called Shell Flat is totally unsourced, and has remained so for several months, I support deletion of the entire article.  Cheers.  N2e (talk) 18:54, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Although cancelled, the project was notable and concerns about the it are well covered by media. The project deserves its page. Beagel (talk) 14:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Article Deletion (August 2010)
Talk:Steam Wheel Tank

message: There is no way that the armament could have been a Browning M2HB .50 caliber machinegun, as neither the .50 caliber cartridge nor the Browning .50 caliber machinegun was adopted until 1921.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.154.20 (talk) 13:29, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Armament 

message: The Steam Tank, the Steam Wheel Tank, and the 150 Ton Field Monitor were three different things. Have corrected. I suspect that the original article relied heavily on American Military Vehicles of World War One by Albert Mroz, arguably the worst book on the subject ever written. http://63528.activeboard.com/t44712478/the-amazing-mr-mroz/
Hengistmate (talk) 12:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: A merger is being proposed that would merge content from Three-wheeled steam tank into this article.  Please comment.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 16:17, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: This article contained major flaws. It was badly researched, relying on a single source that contained flaws. Those have now been corrected, and additional reliable sources have been presented. To anticipate possible objections: the 75mm howitzer shown in the picture is not connected with the Steam Wheel Tank. It is probably from the earlier Gas-electric Tank - the photo was taken at an exhibition at Aberdeen in the 1920s, and the howitzer happened to be in the shot. Hengistmate (talk) 12:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections on January 12th, 2017.
Talk:Thanet Wind Farm

message: The "Criticism" section has issues. There is some basic misunderstanding of physics in the cited source. Capacity factor is about Energy not Power. A, 25% capacity factor does not strictly mean the plant produces '75MW on average'. Regardless, the whole issue of capacity factor as a proxy for efficiency is erroneous and a red herring, it's what the plant produces in GWh/yr that matters. Does the plant meet it's design production yield over a number of years? Also, as an insider, who knows the staffing numbers at this plant, the number of FTE's is factually inaccurate (underestimates). Further, the value of support services and companies (many local) are not recognised.  I believe this section attempts to deliberately obfuscate and is not balanced. 
--Davagh (talk) 12:20, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism Section 
Talk:Thorntonbank Wind Farm

message: But none of the so called "facts" are cited properly and looks to me written by the company itself. Time for a bit of a rewrite methinks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.152.16.114 (talk) 10:09, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Reliable sources are needed. The primary sources, C-power and RWE, even disagree on the number of turbines in Phases 2 and 3, although the total number is the same. TGCP (talk) 20:25, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice Advert And Opinion Piece 

message: The article is incorrectly named. It should be Thornton Bank. It is clear that the creator was a Dutch speaker and made the common mistake of joining the two words. I propose renaming the article. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 00:20, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: At first glance, it looks to me that it is known as Thorntonbank. From the company: . And also this one (I can't read the language, but it is referred to exclusively as "Thorntonbank")  peterl (talk) 21:23, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thornton Bank
Talk:Wind power in Sweden

message: The table suggests that in 2020, from  27,526 GWh generation, the share is 20.3%.
However, from the same source (SCB) I see that the total use is 172,725 GWh, which would make the share 15,7%.
I am not going to bother changing this right now, but if I do not get an answer to what this discrepancy is about, I might later.
Star Lord  -   星爵 (talk) 13:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  small discrepancy question
Talk:WRVW

message: I'm not certain, but I'm fairly sure the link leads to a different Jim Chandler than the one mentioned in this article.The bringer of terror (talk) 03:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jim Chandler
Talk:Let Me Call You Sweetheart

message: This song appears in many episodes of the Waltons, sung by members of the family or community on various occasions. It's almost a fixture of the series, like the "goodnights" at the end of each episode, or the Baldwin sister's recipe. No article about this song can be complete without mentioning the Waltons.
ColmCille (talk) 22:40, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Waltons 

message: I love the book "Let me call you Sweetheart" by Mary Higgins Clark. This song surely awakened some friction! Amiduvanessa (talk) 21:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The book
Talk:WSTV (AM)

message: I realize this was removed due to lack of sources, but here it is, so as not to lose it somewhere in the edit history. Hopefully, much of this can return, though I would suggest rewriting it and cleaning it up, referencing the material and removing the fluffy POV stuff. I noticed that this history was reprinted on WSTV's website:
WSTV signed on the air in 1940 and was the dominant station in the Steubenville-Weirton market. Up until the late 1980s WSTV had higher ratings than any FM station in the market including its sister station WRKY FM 103.5.
On the 30th of October, T.J. Slowie, Secretary of the Federal Communications Commission in Washington, D.C., sent a telegram to Steubenville. In it he authorized the first programming on WSTV, an AM station whose studios were located on the third floor of the Exchange Realty Building on Market Street.
WSTV, "the Voice of the Valley," was born. Forty-nine civic and business leaders from the city had banded together to start the station and dedicated it to serving the community. When WSTV went on the air they were a part of the Mutual Broadcasting Network and a member of the Friendly Group, an alliance of four radio stations in Steubenville, Pittsburgh, Atlantic City, and Kingston, NY.
WSTV was a news leader in the Valley even then. One of its first broadcasts was the result of the 1940 presidential elections. WSTV beamed the news of the attack at Pearl Harbor into the homes of the valley's citizens. Later they carried news of FDR's death, and the happier news of V-E Day and V-J Day.
The staff of WSTV wasn't willing to stop at simply reporting the news. In the spring of 1945 WSTV started the Steubenville Radio Forum moderated by A. Robert Anderson, then pastor of the 5th Street Methodist Church. On the 21st of October, 1946 during that program Harry Cochran, Local News Editor, delivered an editorial that sparked the greatest transformation in the history of Steubenville. At the time crime in the city was rampant; corruption among elected officials was expected. Because of the officials’ corruption, unchecked crime, and open displays of vice, Steubenville had taken on the reputation and name of “Little Chicago.” Cochran decided that he had had enough and declared on air, "It's time for a rat extermination campaign in Steubenville." An association of 12 ministers agreed, banded together, and proceeded to stamp out prostitution, gambling, and official corruption. For their involvement in the effort, WSTV won a plaque and special recognition from Variety Magazine for displaying “responsibility to the community.”--Fightingirish (talk) 16:38, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That website copies this information off one of our mirror sites.  I have been able to add back the information about first reporting on JFK's assassination and the start of World War II from the WTRF-TV article and video report, but the rest I can still not confirm via any sources available though many a-search.  I would gladly welcome any help that anyone can give. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 00:21, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed history
Category talk:Writers Guild of America

message: Hello,
I think the 2007 Writers Guild of America strike article is great but I'm concerned the organization of these articles is getting muddled.  
We currently have two overarching cats covering these WGAE and WGAw items:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Affiliation_of_Writers_Guilds
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Writers%27_organizations
(I'm using the web links because I don't know how to reference these without adding this discussion page to those cats.)
The IAWG has the distinct advantage of actually existing whereas the generic "WGA" is basically just a misnomer based on sloppy reporting.  (The description of the cat does specify that these are really two distinct organizations which is positive.)
I'm not sure how this category clarifies the situation.  Please help me understand.DirectRevelation 20:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this cat needed?

message: There is a lot of interest in this group of subjects right now because of the strike with a lot of new content being added which is great.  Based on that I'm willing to take a wait and see approach.
I suspect that the Writers Guild of America page (which is now a diambiguation) better serves to clarify the articles than this cat but maybe I'll be proven wrong.
Oh, I did remove this as a category on the disamg page because I couldn't find any other DA pages with cats.  If anyone disagrees, I have no objection to it being re-added for now.  DirectRevelation (talk) 20:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cat versus Disambig
Talk:WNJR (FM)

message: I think it's an exaggeration to say this station serves the Pittsburgh Area...  the local area contour on the signal propogation map doesn't reach into any part of Allegheny County.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 09:29, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When I was living in the area, you could get it as far as the airport. I also heard it in Forest Hills, actually. But I think defining "Pittsburgh area" should be "Pittsburgh metropolitan area", which includes all the surrounding suburbs. --Midnightdreary (talk) 12:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pittsburgh area?

message: I've been in email contact with the faculty advisor of this radio station over the past few months trying to secure WP:OTRS permission for photos relating to the station.  The station has sent me several photos, but unfortunately, they were not accompanies by adequate copyright releases.  I sent a follow-up email last week, and hopefully things will begin to move forward soon.--GrapedApe (talk) 16:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo submission update
Template talk:Sacramento Radio

message: There is no KSSU on the AM band in the FCC database and the bluelink in the template points to a disambiguation page.  Did this station change call letters, go off the air, or what? - Dravecky (talk) 03:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  KSSU 

message: Should is be "Radio stations in the Sacramento area" rather than market, which sounds a bit...eeuf. I dont edit these articles, so don't mind me if not. Ceoil 21:58, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Rastus

message: The following post was from 2007 and has now been archived, but it's still accurate:  It's remarkable that an article this short could simultaneously have so much good information and so many problems.  I've added information showing that "Rastus" was not in fact a common slave name; its association with African-Americans is factitious.  I've also removed the claim that the name "became synonymous with the stereotype of the happy, carefree Southern Black created by Southern Whites to justify their continued oppression of Blacks."  I don't question that "Rastus" is an ethnic slur, but statements like that have a lot of unsupported claims wrapped up in them.  For example, what's the basis for the claim that the stereotype was created by Southern Whites?  How do we know it wasn't Northern Whites, for example?
The immediate cleanup need is to put references in good form (most of the information is already there).  A text edit, with an eye for good support and maintaining NPOV, would also be helpful.  John M Baker (talk) 14:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup still needed

message: This article says Frank L. White's photo appeared on the box in the 1920s. Then there's a picture of the box with Frank L. White on it, and it says the box was from 1901 to 1925. And if you go to the Frank L. White article, it says he was born in 1967, meaning he was nearly 60 when he appeared on the box, and he certainly doesn't look it (unless they pulled up an old picture to use).  Also, the article on him says he was put on the box in 1900. Something's not right.
47.136.245.124 (talk) 12:41, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frank L. White photo timing
Talk:Knight of the Phoenix

message: This article has no references. WP:V requires that references be provided for articles, if none can be found, the article should be deleted. I haven't found any sources for this so I'm placing a tag on the article to get some help, if you disagree please discuss it here before removing the tag. Mad031683 20:22, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Isn't the plot a little too detailed? I could almost reproduce the entire episode shot for shot with the level of detail this contains.CoW mAnX (talk) 19:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I shortened it down considerably - I request the original editors to give up editing because they don't know how to edit properly, nor write in proper English for that matter. Cyberia23 (talk) 05:24, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Much improved! Thanks! CoW mAnX (talk) 23:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot too detailed 

message: Contrary to the statement "Michael promises Buddy one last ride in KITT," Michael actually had to rebuff Maggie's request to take Buddy for one last ride with the reply "That might be one small problem." The scene then cuts to Michael and Devon inside KITT, on the way to the jet that Michael boards with Devon. Buddy did not actually appear again in this episode after Michael dropped him off following the demolition derby scene and the earlier, brief interlude with Maggie. Please correct the incorrect information in this entry.  edit request from IP moved from article to here. Calmer Waters 00:57, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  edit request
Talk:First shirt

message: Shouldnt this, as a slang term, be added to the First Sergeant page? 74.180.79.68 (talk) 04:57, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah a redirect from here to the same info on the 1st Sgt. page would be a good idea. Sf46 (talk) 03:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Sergeant?? 

message: At least in the Air Force, the First Sergeant is not usually the highest ranking enlisted person in a unit; an Air Force First Sergeant is more a role than a rank, and can be held by a Master Sergeant, Senior Master Sergeant or Chief Master Sergeant.  It is not uncommon to have a Master Sergeant as a unit's First Sergeant while also having Senior & Chief Master Sergeants in the same unit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.88.174.18 (talk) 07:45, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highest Ranking?
Category talk:Greek tennis players

message: Vasilis Mazarakis has a wiki and is not included here.  He plays tennis for Greece.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.93.171 (talk) 01:35, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mazarakis 

message: Her name should be under F and not S, because all of the other players are under their last initial, not their first.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.93.171 (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stamatia Fafaliou
Talk:Hoechst stain

message: Cells can integrate BrdU in newly synthesized DNA as a substitute for thymidine. When BrdU is integrated into DNA, it is supposed that the bromine deforms the minor groove so that Hoechst dyes cannot reach their optimal binding site. Binding of Hoechst dyes is even stronger to BrdU-substituted DNA; however, no fluorescence ensues.
once saying it cannot reach binding site, then saying the binding is even stronger?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brainstudent87 (talk • contribs) 09:17, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraph with BrdU is confusing 

message: The text was expanded and provided with additional images and references. However, the readability needs to be improved. And the conformity of the references must be checked.Crenim (talk) 16:30, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New text 

message: I presume the stains are named for Hoechst AG, but I'm loathe to add this without a source. Anyone fancy digging up something on the etymology? GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 20:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They are - and Hoechst is numbering all their compounds so this dye is the 33258th compound made by Hoechst// that went into the Hoechst compound library Iridos (talk) 21:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Eponym

message: According to the Aldrich catalog the structure is missing a nitrogen - the  leftmost ring should be based on Piperazine, not on Piperidine. I'll see if I can supply an svg graphic instead of this low-res pixel one. This also makes more sense considering this should be a single compound, as there would exist two Enantiomers of the compound currently shown. Iridos (talk) 21:20, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is an error, nitrogen should be, enantiomers no.--P99am (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 

message: I propose that Bisbenzimide be merged into Hoechst stain. Any useful content in the Bisbenzimide article can easily be combined with this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.119.202.1 (talk) 20:43, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Moving average

message: In the subsection "Approximating the EMA with a limited number of terms", a new variable is introduced: N. It is stated that alpha approaches 0 as N increases without bound. Is this N the same as n above? The discussion includes the relationship alpha = 2/(N+1) at several points below: in the cited section, "Relationship between SMA and EMA", and "Modified moving average". Clarification would help immensely. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Surakmath (talk • contribs) 03:33, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notation unclear
Talk:Lithobolos

message: This article is really nothing: A ancient war machine throw stones from 10 up to 180. OK, rubish. Theres even no definition of the diffrence between the Lithobolos and a Palintona. Farewell, --Leo Decristoforo (talk) 14:25, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:   No Information 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Geoffr

message: Image:4
Mainspace228
Talk:22
Template:1
User talk:156
User:12
Wikipedia talk:16
Wikipedia:14
avg edits per page 1.60
earliest16:15, 16 December 2005
number of unique pages283
total453
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 20:45, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Geoffr