Talk:Areas of Edinburgh

message: has anyone ever used this word? The nearest I can recall is Ahm frae Ednnburrah (as against the Glaswegian Embra). Also, Cramond has long been used as a Sunday walk for Leithers - why exclude them?  I write as a Leither in exile in the Far West (Gourock). Have edited the line to something more neutral. tarrathenoo, --dave souza 23:34, 26 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Can I point out the spelling Edinburgher? Also for evidence of usage check the Scotsman newspaper. Try this search. In general when I hear the word used it's with tongue slightly in cheek, as no-one is quite certain if the word is a 'madey-upper'. --Air 14:13, 27 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: Educational, this wikipedia! Presumably pronounced as in hamburger, not as burgh/borough. Since I'm evidently well out of date a check over Cramond would be appreciated - is there still a  a rowing-boat ferry over to Dalmeny Woods? - dave souza 20:53, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)

text: I am afraid the Dalmeny ferry is no more - it stopped running a few years ago. It is rather sad if you ask me. Magicalsausage 20:36, 2 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sad indeed, that was a splendid walk - still presumably available from the other end. Cramond modified to suit. Still, nice about the oldest settlement thing. Ta for the info, - dave souza 06:00, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edinburgers ?? 

message: I substituted the template because, at the moment, this article is the only place it appears. This may be suitable for such a large template; and if it is only to appear here, it will probably be easier to maintain subst'ed. If there is consensus to change the situation, that's fine too. Septentrionalis 21:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember reading through a deletion discussion of the template last year sometime, but it was hard to track down again due to it being misfiled: Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/Deleted/August 2005#Template:Areas of Edinburgh. If properly done, with the template using  and surrounded by  ...  so it's automatically hidden if there's more than one nav template then I would be for putting this template back onto the articles... /wangi 10:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please make sure that  works first; there is some agitated discussion on its talk page. Septentrionalis 15:27, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You can see it in action at a number of Australian articles, for example have a look at the bottom of University of Western Australia. However I'm not sure about the template - listifying it and then working through it to create articles is maybe a better idea. Thanks/wangi 15:30, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Template

message: The Tynecastle link in the template currently redirects to the football stadium. We should probably have a distinct article for the micro-area around it, or at least work on the mentioning of the use of the name for the area (and the school) in the present (stadium) article. – Kieran T (talk) 00:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tynecastle 

message: This was proposed as delete, because contents was moved to an infobox. If this is the case, then this article MUST be kept, as required by our copyright policy, to preserve attribution.  DGG ( talk ) 00:24, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: proposed deletion

message: In its new shape, the article is essentially a WP:list. If this is the case, the title shall use Wikipedia:Naming conventions (lists) and be properly categorized. Викидим (talk) 00:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A list?