lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Conspicuous Service Cross (Australia)

message: Is this section necessary?  Does it add to the article? --Oliver Nouther (talk) 21:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, it seems unnecessary to me. Anotherclown (talk) 08:56, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day, good question. I'm inclined to agree with Anotherclown on this one. I'm not sure what benefit the article would get from listing fictional characters that have "received" the award. That's just my opinion, though. You might consider asking for wider opinions, though, if you want to get a broader consensus. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:18, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional Characters
Talk:Beulah Brinton House

message: Well, the article tells a lot about Beulah, rather than about the house. With a BB-Park and a BB Community Center in that area, why not make Beulah Brinton article instead and mention the house, park and center there? --87.164.133.46 (talk) 17:21, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beulah Brinton in general / park / community center
Talk:Star of Courage (Australia)

message: I have included the criteria for "decoration allowance". Since the overwhelming majority of awards of the Star of Courage are for gallantry in Australia only the few servicepersons who are awarded the medal for gallantry overseas in an area subject to the VEA will ever be eligible for the allowance. Anthony Staunton (talk) 09:51, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decoration allowance 

message: I have added 2 civil recipients, I am currently searching for any list of recipients to add all 135 people military and civil, please bear with me or if you can, help me to put everyone on.  Martin Thompson (Marty) 22:39, 22 November 2009 (UTC  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martin Thompson (Marty) (talk • contribs)  
:135 is probably a few too many to comfortably list on this page.  This page is fundamentally about the medal itself - perhaps it would be better (once a significant number of people are identified) to start an article dedicated to the recipients?  List of recipients of the Star of Courage (Australia) would be the logical choice.  This is the usual practice for medals/decorations which have a substantial number of recipients.  Additionally, if we have biographical articles on any of the recipients here on wikipedia, we could create and add them to :Category:Recipients of the Star of Courage (Australia).  cf the contents of :Category:Recipients of Australian military awards and decorations and :Category:Recipients of Australian civil awards and decorations.  --Xdamrtalk 22:50, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil Recipients 

message: I have no idea how to amend the title of the 'Orders, Decorations, and Medals of Australia Australian Honours Order of Precedence' at the bottom of the article and rename it 'Chart of Orders, Decorations, and Medals of Australia'. I would delete 'Australian Honours Order of Precedence' since that document has been superseded by the 'Australian Order of Wear'. Neither the previous Order of Precedence or the current Order of Wear bear any similarity to this chart. Anthony Staunton (talk) 14:22, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: G'day Anthony, to change that I believe you would have to edit the template: . Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 12:13, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orders, Decorations, and Medals of Australia Australian Honours Order of Precedence
Talk:Banque Sahélo-Saharienne pour l'Investissement et le Commerce

message: We would be glad to send some detail information to update our information on your page since there is nothing to show ! Please can there be another platform for this or we must upload it here . well am a staff with the business development unit of the bank , BSIC,Ghana  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.222.232.146 (talk) 17:25, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  INFORMATION ON BSIC GHANA 
Talk:Australian Defence Medal

message: This account was posted on a forum. If it can be verified, and sourced, it could improv the article.
 
 Some time in 2005, US President George Walker Bush was having a dinner with Australian Prime Minister John Howard. Sitting at the table was an Australian Warrant Officer of 20 years service. He was not wearing any medals. 
 Bush asked Howard how can a man with 20 years service, who hold the Queens Warrant, who had been in two Wars, not have a Medal.
 Howard explained that we do not give Medals for serving, we only give medals for exceptional acts.
 Well Bush was horrified. He lectured Prime Minister Howard and told him it was a disgrace that an Australian could serve a lifetime in the Military and not even get one single Medal.
 So on that night, the Australian Defence Medal for Service was born. 
 We call it the George Bush Medal (respectfully)
 Its thanks to GWB that Australians who have served in non wartime can wear a Medal signifying their service.
 We have a lot of time for President George Walker Bush.
24.4.136.172 (talk) 16:10, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the medal
Talk:The Pact (novel)

message: ::Hi! I would like to expand upon what has already been written about this novel. I would like to describe the structure of the book, provide a breakdown of the plot, add a description of central characters, discuss any possible themes, and include any awards it may have received.Aflor148 (talk) 15:47, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding to the article
Talk:Group Bravery Citation

message: :File:Group Bravey Citation (Australia).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
-- Marchjuly (talk) 03:31, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for File:Group Bravey Citation (Australia).jpg
Talk:Medal for Gallantry

message: This page was recently amended to say the latest date for the award was 18 June2007. Is there a reference for this?? PalawanOz 13:50, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Latest award
Talk:Australian Active Service Medal

message: To those who wish to include information about a proposed new AASM, and concerns that service personnel have about the OSM (e.g. here and here, please only add information that can be cited to reliable sources. Please also remember that it needs to be written neutrally, and that site policy requires all information to be verifiable. Wikipedia is not the place to soapbox. Continued addition of unreferenced information is disruptive. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 07:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Information about a proposed new AASM
Talk:Left anterior descending artery

message: This should be merged into the section of coronary artery.  The coronary arteries are so similar, there is no point in duplicating all the introductions and diagrams and forcing the reader to look at seperate pages to get more detail on each individual artery.  Dlodge 21:15, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This

message: Belongs here. Google it if you need additional reading. AStudent (talk) 20:04, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Widowmaker

message: Its not entirely obvious what this picture is supposed to be showing. I think it should be pointed out. I can't do it myself though, cause I'm not sure what its depicting. Clearly one half of it references the article, but the other half is confusing. Is it a comparison picture? The same heart at a different time? 74.134.243.62 (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification on the animated picture 

message: Propose to merge the widow maker here. WP:DUP, same subject, the widow maker seems to be a WP:NOTDIC issue. Brandmeistertalk   12:29, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes good idea. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:38, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I agree! Maestroso simplo (talk) 03:20, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the articles overlap widely. --Tilifa Ocaufa (talk) 12:09, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like there's some good agreement on this merger so far. I was thinking we could merge now but WP:MERGE recommends waiting at least a week before making a decision (through concensus). In the mean time I'll notify some of the most recent editors using this tag:. Also, does someone have experience merging articles? I've read through WP:MERGETEXT and understand it but that doesn't necessarily mean I'll be able to do it. Maestroso simplo (talk) 01:19, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

text: Merged now, after recommended one week. Brandmeistertalk   12:31, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I've moved this page to its much more commonly used variant, LAD. N-gram:  --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:33, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:NASCAR Mexico Series

message: I have started a discussion at WikiProject NASCAR to see if it make sense to merge the NASCAR Mexico article into this one. Royalbroil 21:03, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger discussion
Talk:Rock Bottom Remainders

message: I have noticed that Barbara Kingsolver is mentioned as a member of the Remainders; however, on the official website, she is NOT listed as a member.  Where did the information come from that she was a member of the RBR? 72.186.143.34 21:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I just moved the page again, from Rock-Bottom Remainders back to Rock Bottom Remainders (no hyphen). The hyphen is not used in the band's promotional material or on the band's website, nor is it used in the Don't Quit Your Day Job label page about the band. The hyphen is out. Binksternet (talk) 18:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved again
Talk:List of PHP IDEs

message: This needs a complete rewrite. It's written like crap and doesn't really explain what an IDE is to new users. Its list of IDEs is also woefully small. FIshstick 21:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely agree. I'm not familiar with PHP IDE's. Go ahead. shotwell 22:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm doing a rewrite at the moment Azuka 00:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

text: For the moment its contents is also redundant with the Comparison of integrated development environments, List of PHP editors and Integrated development environment articles. Moreover it lists tools that aren't IDEs but simple editors, like TextPad for example. In its actual form I think the article should be deleted, it's just useless. An idea would be to transform it into a comparison of IDEs PHP, with detailed features. --Goa103 10:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 15:57, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Wristlock

message: You are correct.  Kote hineri is the shodokan (or Tomiki) aikido term for sankyo, and kote mawashi is their term for nikkyo.  And in fact yonkyo (a.k.a. tekubi osae, yonkajo) is actually a rotational lock like sankyo, although many overemphasize the pain compliance aspects of it.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.191.131.194 (talk) 23:04:20, August 19, 2007 (UTC) 
While i do believe it is useful to name the japanese names for various techniques, I'm not sure they are mentioned accurately.
The kote mawashi described herein this article is more like kote hineri, and the technique an aikidoka would call Nikyo would probably be called kote mawashi.
Perhaps a yudansha for judo or aikido or jujutsu could clarify this article or rebunk my comment?
--137.99.179.63 21:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Terms like ikkyo,nikkyo,sankyo ("first, second, third teachings") etc are used accurately here to describe specific manipulations as they are found in aikido however this is not true of Daito-ryu aikijujutsu where the terms ikkajo and nikkajo are used instead and denote portions of the curriculum rather than these specific manipulations. I removed references to them as aikijujutsu terms.--Mateo2006 13:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terms 

message: How about posting a illustration of "rotational wristlock/sankyo" and "pronating wristlock/gokyo" from the same source for consistancy?--Mateo2006 13:44, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustration/Photo 

message: I see that someone has changed the name of the 'aikido version' of the pronating wristlock to sankyo. If the pronating wristlock described is sankyo it does not conform to the lock in the first photo on the page.
I believe sankyo is what is being referred to as the rotational wristlock in this article. --Mateo2006 02:30, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronating wristlock
Talk:Karr-Koussevitzky double bass

message: I'll finish up in a little bit. -- ßottesiηi (talk) 21:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pretty much done. -- ßottesiηi (talk) 00:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it is pretty much "the" bass. It's like the Soil Strad for bassists. -- ßottesiηi (talk) 23:23, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Oh, and the article doesn't emphasize it, but it was a big deal in the scientific community when they used growth rings in an attempt to date it. () -- ßottesiηi (talk) 23:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Simon Wolstencroft

message: Is The Colourfield reference really right?  Not only was the Colourfield more successful in singles terms than all the other bands mentioned during the times Simon was member, there is no reference to him anywhere in the Colourfield's own entry?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JSN2849 (talk • contribs) 08:33, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alice (Bloody Roar)

message: I believe that a picture of alice's as well of the others beast form should be included on their pages - RVDDP2501 14:13, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Royal Earl House

message: A Google search for a particular term in this article about how Royal got interested in electricity: ("However, he read a work on electricity which so inspired him that he decided to give up law") finds this site: insulators which the author says is excerpted from older texts. So it may or may not be an actual violation. -- Epousesquecido 21:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copy violation
Talk:Wattle Point Wind Farm

message: What is the basis of the merge proposal? I note that there are 16 stubs in :Category:Wind farms in Australia. I have no idea if it's practical to expand a wind farm article to a full-length article or if it will always be a stub, but my first impression is that Edithburgh, South Australia does not really belong in the wind farms category, therefore to oppose the merge. I took the photos that are presently on both articles, but I'm happy to have different subjects on the Edithburgh article - they reflect what I take photos of, more than they reflect what Edithburgh is about. --Scott Davis Talk 21:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I spent a weekend there. I sorted through my photos later to see what I could add to Wikipedia, rather than targetting particular articles or images. I created the Edithburgh article to host the photos, before there was a push to create all the power station articles. I'll drop the bigger photo off the Edithburgh page pending someone finding/taking better Edithburgh pictures. The view of the windfarm from the town jetty would be better than the paddock view, plus one of some significant town buildings/streetscape. They're not the type of holiday snaps I take other than deliberately for Wikipedia. --Scott Davis Talk 02:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I too oppose the merge for the reasons discussed above. Johnfos 06:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge with [[Edithburgh, South Australia]]

message: See Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm#Rename along with all other incorrectly named windfarm pages for centralised discussion. Donama (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename in line with [[WP:TITLE]] 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Snowtown Wind Farm which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 00:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Pierre et Jean

message: I created a page on Guy de Maupassant's psychological novel Pierre et Jean.  The text is mostly translated from this article[] in the French Wikipedia (though I re-worded some of it to make it more coherent in English); I hope that such an action doesn't count as copying from another website, since it is technically from Wikipedia, just . . . in French. --Anglican 21:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lois Herr

message: This edit removes a valid reference, among other issues. Enigmamsg 03:33, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I fixed everything with these two edits. The Washington Post article is currently the first reference in the article. Cunard (talk) 15:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem 

message: I'm just about to add a link to Herr's papers at the Hagley Library.  If an AfD ever comes up again, this should seal the case for KEEP.  One thing about the papers is that the finding aid appears to have some great similarities with this article.  The papers were donated to Hagley 2010-2012, after this article was started.  A brief check of the last edits in 2009 and in 2010 show that some but not all the similarities were added before 2009 and in 2010, almost certainly before the finding aid was written.  So is anybody copying somebody else?  I'd guess that both Hagely and Wikipedia are copying to some extent from materials originally provided by Herr, perhaps in her election campaigns.  I don't think that it is important to place blame anywhere, but will anybody join me in re-writing some of this article?  Smallbones(smalltalk) 17:13, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Posible Copyvio??
Talk:Francis Eric Bloy

message: I think this page should be back under "Francis Eric Bloy." Here's why: 1) Almost all bishops' pages are under their full names. 2) References I've found on the Web call him F. Eric Bloy, not Francis E. Bloy, so Francis Bloy would not be the expected title for his page (Eric Bloy would be more in keeping with what he was called, though I wouldn't advocate naming it that either.) While the Episcopal Church Annual lists him as "Francis E. I. Bloy" in its succession list, the Diocese of L.A.'s listing has him as F. Eric Bloy.   ~ InkQuill  05:27, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, for all the reasons you've mentioned. In formal writing in the Episcopal Church, bishop's almost always get all their names. -- BPMullins | Talk 20:51, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: F. Eric
Talk:Ganong Bros.

message: A user recently created a page for Pal-o-mine and I suggested it be merged with this article. It needs some work, so if anyone wants to help out that would be appreciated. I've never seen/heard of the bars myself so I'm a bit out of the loop. DietFoodstamp (talk) 20:58, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pal-o-mine 
Talk:Mikontalo

message: Please sign your comments.
Someone removeed the paragraph about the "Mikontalo Wake Up" song, arguing that it wasn't true, but absolutly it, so I write it again.
it's f.ing true. i want to shoot them in the head.
I agree for the removal of aricle...
Song is not an usual thing - some spanish guy thought that is very clever to sing this with happy birthday melody year ago which was popular just for one erasmus "season"...Sorry..Mikontalo has more than 25 years of history...
Even if some people don't like it, the song it's actually singed every week, it has become a tradition. You can love it, or hate it, but it is there. I only wanted to say that the song it is singed in these last years.
You can write everything in wikipedia in the correct encyclopedian manner.
tradition is tradition, nowadays is nowadays  - Now, You start to distinguish the small difference! -->but, It's not enough!So, other story is that Mikontalo has certain regulations FOR EVERY STUDENT - your passage will give bad impression to people reading this article - that everything is allowed in Mikontalo(You know maybe about severe duscussion in itlist about Mikontalo rules) and You can sing at night "Mikontalo wake up"!!!You will just give bad impression about international students and erasmus program also...Regulations are for everybody - if you want to sing the songs to wake people - You are just raunchy simpleton(that can be found in every dormitory around the world)...If you want this passage to live - add some words that this song is sang by drunken fools early in the morning..Ex: --> Nowadays, some minority of drunken fools(most of them international erasmus students) use to sing "Mikontalo wake up" early in the morning", although there are certain regulations against it. - that is the true story suitable for wikipedia!Sorry man - be civilised contributor not a provocator!
--Mik Gigs 16 December 2006 (UTC)
After couple of years living in Mikontalo I can confirm that the "Mikontalo Wake up" has appeared in October 2006.
If it becomes a "tradition" some International students, it remains a main burden for about 800 people living in the surroundings.
It will probably last for a semester or two but will go with the international students themselves.
New songs/hymn might be invented by the students but in any case they don't have their part in the main "History" of this Finnish Student Building.
On top of that, as said by the previous person, this is an encyclopedia. Writing such things about Mikontalo would make it a tale book.
--Julien Fourgeaud 17:38, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Double Dragon (film)

message: I saw the movie this morning on german TV (I'm a no more young German) and I found it entertaining, good produced and with a sense of humor.Ogygia (talk) 15:58, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  short message from Germany 
Talk:Emley (disambiguation)

message: I would suggest that this Disambiguation page is deleted - the other location other than Emley, West Yorkshire is un-notable. --Gavinio 22:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Adverbs (novel)

message: Is it just me, or are there a lot of gay men in this book?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.247.244.120 (talk) 22:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexuality in this book 

message: As it is, the plot summary isn't complete; it doesn't describe all the stories, and describes some of the stories in more detail than others. Also, how would people feel about having a section of the article that attempts to identify which characters might be the same characters, and bring all the stories into as coherent a universe as possible? This probably isn't Handler's intention but it would be fun.24.63.242.81 (talk) 03:26, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Summary
Talk:Vote for Larry

message: "ad person" used to describe Peter is insufficient. Can anyone formulate a better word? Jjujje (talk) 23:19, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Ad Person?

message: Writing style paragraph: "comes off as" according to whom? Jjujje (talk) 23:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Style paragraph