Talk:Sunny Came Home

message: I have recently updated the chronology of singles from Shawn Colvin's website. There seems to be a few problems with the dates. The article currently states that Sunny was released in 1997; however Colvin's website lists a 1996 date for this song, plus the previous singles before and after Sunny: Get Out of this House and You and the Mona Lisa. AllMusic lists a release date of 1996 for Sunny and a 1997 release date for You and the Mona Lisa (Get Out of this House was not listed). If someone could clear this up, thanks. Also, Amazon wasn't much help here. - Thanks, Hoshie 07:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date problem? 

message: :Image:Sunnycamehome.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:51, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Sunnycamehome.jpg

message: I followed the link for the first footnote (on answers.com) only to read the exact information that in the wiki article. Is this permissible? I suspect it's against Wikipedia guidelines.
: Answers.com largely does copy Wikipedia articles and it is legally permitted and encouraged for sites to do so by the guidelines. It's odd that it would be a footnote on this article, however--Sketchee (talk) 04:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Wholesale copying?

message: The beginning of the About The Single section says the song is about a woman burning down her house to escape her past, and cites the bio on the artist's website as its source. The bio says no such thing, however. It says it's a "murder-ballad" and that's it. Even then, Colvin did not write the bio, which refers to her in third person. It could be an assumption by the bio-writer, or it could even be a result of Colvin lying. (Songwriters often lie about their most complex lyrics, I've found, often to make people think harder about the lyrics. This is indeed a very complex song, and it's definitely open to multiple interpretations, not all of them violent.) Should this citation be changed to something like 'The biography on Colvin's website describes the song as a "murder-ballad".' or even removed entirely? --Almighty Doer of Stuff (talk) 20:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burning down a house?