Talk:Dissenters' March

message: I couldn't find a reference about this. I did find a mention about a Spanish documentary where the US Government is financing anti-chavez and violent movements in Venezuela, where it is briefly mentioned that the methodology and even logos where the same as the "Colour Revolutions" in eastern Europe. It is maybe a good idea to give the name of the documentary and director, the only reference is an russian article. Which the majority of readers won't understand.
--Alma-Tadema (talk) 16:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: French Documentary

message: Why does this article's history no longer show that I created and wrote the original draft of it? Nor does it show that it was originally scheduled for deletion and I successfully avoided that? And the comments related to that? Is it because someone changed the title?
--BillyTFried 10:29, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You started your article over at The March of Those Who Disagree - I think it was merged into here. -- ALoan (Talk) 14:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I wrote this

message: And have injected too many quotes. And having the "See Also" point to the Tienanmen Square MASSACRE is ridiculous. --BillyTFried 10:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actually the changes to this article are fully biased 

message: Why was the Russian related Stub tag changed to a regular stub tag? It seems the only thing left that shows I originated the article is the upload tag on the main photo. And pages like this one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_March_of_Those_Who_Disagree&action=history
--BillyTFried 10:53, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually as described above, what happened is 2 of you started an article. Kazahkpol realised this and took whatever was missing from his article article from your article and merged it into his article. Normal practice is generally to use the most complete version as the starting point. In this case, since both articles were about the same quality (from a quick look) and his article was the better title and also perhaps since he was the one doing the merge it was probably best to merge your article into his which is what he did. He probably should have mentioned he merged your article into his in the edit summary of this/his article but he didn't. However as you seem to be aware, the edit summary of your article is still available under the original title which is now a redirect. Admitedly your article was started quite a while before KP's so perhaps he should have searched better but it can be difficult to find these kind of things when there are a lot of different translations. Oh and the stub tag wasn't changed, KP used a less specific stub tag and neglected to change it to your more specific one when merging. Nil Einne 18:46, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  And... 

message: There seems to be a typo: it should be discontented instead of disconsented. Besides, we should disambiguate it from the 2006 rally in Moscow with the same title (or describe both). So I propose to move the article to Saint Petersburg March of the Discontented. And hey, don't forget to fix double redirects. Colchicum 21:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That doesn't mean you could post two different names on English and Russian of that march in the introductory opening paragraph.Vlad fedorov 09:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me that the original word in the article name resembled closer the Russian name of the march.  Dict.org does not show it among known words, but it does show "unconsenting".  The list of synonyms to the latter includes another common word, "disagreeing".  The passive voice of "discontented" and its negative connotation confuses me.  Webster says "discontented" means "dissatisfied; uneasy in mind; malcontent".  That does not reflect the original Russian word, as far as I know.  The Russian word in the name, "несогласные", means to me only "those who disagree", as the comment suggested.  ilgiz 04:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: I have suggested the article for WP:DYK (see Template_talk:Did_you_know#Created_on_March_4). Please check the question Alex Bakharev 08:16, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have suggested this article for WP:ITN. --Camptown 15:39, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: To be honest, I don't know if there's much point going for ITN. It was on March 3rd so it should either be just after of just before Ungdomshuset and therefore is going to disappear fairly soon. Also, I personally don't know whether it really meets the international interest criteria. Nil Einne 19:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DYK 

message: I think there is no serious information contribution of this photo to the article. Besides, Gulayev is not so important like Kasyanov and Kasparov who couragously left protestors after their speeches. We should replace it with other photo on which protestors beat OMON. This issue is not covered at all in text, as also the fact that "peaceful" protestors broke through three blocks set up by OMON in different places. Vlad fedorov 09:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gulyayev is the chairman of the organizing committee. Why do you edit this if you know nothing about the subject? Colchicum 14:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL. I know who is he. I talk about his photo. What great informational sense does his photo possess?Vlad fedorov 17:58, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL. And what "great informational sense" сan possess second photo of protesters beating OMON? As far as I know, there were no more than 1-2 OMONers who were surrounded and beaten by the protesters, many of resources talk about it. And of course, protesters beaten OMON just because OMON tried beating and detaining absolutely peaceful protestors - no one glass or shop window were broken. At the same time many of the protesters were beaten by OMON, I collected dozens photos of it. GoWest8 20:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Apart from your strong emotions expressed here, please tell what information does photo of Gulayev contribute to the article?Vlad fedorov 05:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And BTW, I believe that provocative photo with Berezovsky is also non-informative, any other photo of the marsh could be better. GoWest8 20:41, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

text: LOL. It is indeed informative because it covers matters not expressed in text. Your bias and single-sidedness is evident in your above statement.Vlad fedorov 05:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What contributions to the article photo of Gulayev does? 

message: Please see the metadata on the image Mn spb 1.jpg inserted in the article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Mn_spb_1.jpg
*Camera manufacturer  PENTAX Corporation  
*Camera model  PENTAX *ist DL  
*Orientation  Normal  
*Horizontal resolution  72 dpi  
*Vertical resolution  72 dpi  
*Software used  Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows  
*File change date and time  04:59, 4 March 2007  
*Y and C positioning  2  
*Exposure time  1/180 sec (0.00555555555556)  
*F-number  f/6.7  
*Exposure Program  Normal program  
*ISO speed rating  400  
*Exif version  2.21  
*Date and time of data generation  13:16, 3 March 2007  
*Date and time of digitizing  13:16, 3 March 2007  
Please pay attention, this image could be a forgery, since it was edited by Photoshop.Vlad fedorov 05:34, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL. Yeah, Vlad, I feel a real KGB-FSB employee in you. No one of your paranoid accusations to me is true. GoWest8 01:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First image in the article 

message: It's clearly many of sources provided in this article are not reliable and linked to sites of involved parties. Elk Salmon 14:43, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course. Especially section titled "Course of Events" which is built exclusively of March participants sources. Thank you for your third party opinion.Vlad fedorov 15:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tagged for NPOV check 

message: Admins, please note. Now it's pretty obviously that user Vlad fedorov regularly vandalize this page. He repeatedly inserting those parts which I edited and motivated it. For example, look for this revision:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saint_Petersburg_March_of_the_Discontented&diff=116452971&oldid=116348386
I motivated almost all of my last edits, but he ignored it and changed everything back without any explanations. For example, he reverted back obvious lie about reasons of ban National-Bolshevik Party and inserted again opinion of Matvienko about "Organizers of the March gathered people form other cities and towns in order to create visibility of many participants of the March" as FACT, although it was only Matvienko's opinion, you can see it from the link. Also he just deleted all of my new contributions, for example, about money penalties.
I believe that user Vlad fedorov must be discharged from editing this article if he cannot motivate his senseless contributions. GoWest8 19:47, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, OK, but I want to know your opinion about it. GoWest8 01:34, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I would like Alex to take his action on violation of WP:CIV as quickly as possible. Because I am going to post it on administrators noticeboard. Moreover, user GoWest8 reverted the article without discussion diff and should be dealt with accordingly. Vlad fedorov 04:45, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  User Vlad fedorov regularly vandalize this page 

message: 1. "Major" word in the beginning. No any doubts that the March was "a major political opposition protest". But Vlad repeatedly deletes it, making accent on "unsactioned" character of the protest. I believe that it violates NPOV and it's just stupid to nag at words like it.
::I doubt at least. It is misattribution, because you present someone allegations and opinions as world accepted views in the introductory paragraph prejudging the rest of the article. Vlad fedorov 07:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bugaga... Colchicum what reference you gave? It is not the reference for my dletions and is your LIE AND THEREFORE VIOLATION OF WP:CIV?  Here is the relevant diff. Now please explain why you consider that Saint Petersburg March of the Discontented' is an accurate translation of Russian Марш несогласных?Vlad fedorov 07:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please translate source which give that wording, because I don't need in Wikipedia to cite legal regulations in order to publish here information from the reliable source.Vlad fedorov 07:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Now please explain why you consider that Saint Petersburg March of the Discontented' is an accurate translation of Russian Марш несогласных?Vlad fedorov 07:50, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Vlad, any objections? Alex Bakharev 23:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Any other disagreements?

message: I could and I should politely discuss the editing of the article. But user GoWest8 disrupts my editing and participation here, by lying that I delete his edits, which he indeed never done. Like here. It is clearly seen, that GoWest8 deletes statement of the mayor Matvienko, claiming it is unreliable source, while statements of Harry Kasparov which contradict to each other are viewed by him as reliable sources. It is clear, that statement of Kasparov, as well as other opposition sources are as reliable as pro-government sources. It is clear that the current version of the article (Course of Events section) is completely build up of opposition sources, is single-sided and biased. It is violation of WP:WEIGHT. I am going to insert in all sections of the article information from the pro-government sources in order to uphold Wikipedia policy.   I don't think that lying and therefore uncivil behavior of user GoWest would help him. Deleting valid and confirmed information that NBP was banned by authorities for inciting racial and ethnic hatred is uncivil and attempt to misinform the reader with intention of advancing personal political views. This article in Wikipedia is not the exclusive property of liberals.Vlad fedorov 07:26, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unicvil behaviour by GoWest8 

message: I must note that most of Vlad fedorov's absurd accusations to my address are obvious non-hidden lie. It's sadly that my politely discussing of the article were repeatedly ignored by him, and my neutral edits were disrupted regularly by him with his tendentious statements. Also he accuse me that I delete and revert his edits without explanations, though it's obvious lie. Lets look in details the history of editing: 
1. Everything began from my series of edits which were made from 18:07 (GMT), 19 March 2007 to 20:39, 19 March 2007. As you can see almost all of my edits were motivated in detail.
2. But at 04:31, 20 March 2007 user Vlad fedorov without ANY explanations cancelled ALL of my edits and reverted the aricle to 16:43, 19 March 2007 revision.
3. Of course I reverted back my edits at 19:24, 20 March 2007 and wrote in this discussion about Vlad's actions.
4. At 04:45, 21 March 2007 and 04:57, 21 March 2007 Vlad cancelled again about half of my edits and we began discussion here.
5. But anyway, I couldn't agree with this revision because of deleting the whole paragraph, deleting money penalties info and re-writing that paragraph by Vlad. So at 13:49, 21 March 2007 I restored my last version.
6. Vlad reverted again to his version at 07:30, 22 March 2007 and accused me of "deleting without any explanations", although in the first series of edits (1) I already motivated reasons of my edits.
7. I restored my version at 13:58, 22 March 2007, and later at 19:37 and 19:43, 22 March 2007 made some compromising edits which were achieved in the discussion.
8. BUT at 07:01, 23 March 2007 Vlad again reverted the article to his old version without ANY explanations _ignored_ achieved compromises. For example, he just deleted again whole paragraph in the beginning (although we achieved for right wording) and inserted false info about allegedly Kasparov's statement on kasparov.ru website.
9. I reverted to the last compromise version at 13:53, 23 March 2007, and everything repeated for one more time at 15:02, 23 March 2007 and 16:57, 23 March 2007.
So as you can see Vlad at least twice (2 and 8) fully ignored my versions which were motivated and compromised, and just reverted back the article without any explanations.
User Vlad fedorov also accuse me that I deleted statement of Matvienko. Yes, I deleted it when restored my last adecvate version, but anyway, it's not place for this statement in "Preventive countermeasures" section. It must be in the "Official reaction and media coverage" section, near other Matvienko's statements, which, by the way, repeat in some sort this statement. Vlad can put it there but he must not just revert the whole article.
Also he lies when he talks that "GoWest8 deletes statement of the mayor Matvienko, claiming it is unreliable source, while statements of Harry Kasparov which contradict to each other are viewed by him as reliable sources". It's obvious lie, I didn't say nothing like it. I was against this paragraph when it was present as fact not Matvienko's opinion (as you can see from here ).
Also it's just absurd that "the current version of the article (Course of Events section) is completely build up of opposition sources, is single-sided and biased". I believe that this article isn't neutral because of too little info from opposition and opposition media is present here and too much from pro-government ones.
And of course information about NBP is clearly lie. You can see for real reasons of NBP ban in the article about it:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Bolshevik_Party#NBP_banned
Information about "...for inciting racial and ethnic hatred..." is just a hoax nonsense.
GoWest8 20:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as you can see, at 05:07, 24 March 2007 user Vlad fedorov again restored all of his false edits ignored this discussion and my last messages in it. I am going to take notice of administrators about it. GoWest8 15:45, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Uncivil behaviour and false statements by user Vlad fedorov

message: By DOUGLAS BIRCH, Associated Press Writer 
52 minutes ago
MOSCOW - Riot police beat and detained protesters as thousands defied an official ban and attempted to stage a rally Saturday against President Vladimir Putin's government, which opponents accuse of rolling back freedoms Russians have enjoyed since the end of Soviet communism. 
 
A similar march planned for Sunday in St. Petersburg has also been banned by authorities.
A coalition of opposition groups organized the "Dissenters March" to protest the economic and social policies of Putin as well as a series of Kremlin actions that critics say has stripped Russians of many political rights. Organizers said only about 2,000 demonstrators turned out.
Thousands of police officers massed to keep the demonstrators off landmark Pushkin Square in downtown Moscow, beating some and detaining many others, including Garry Kasparov, the former world chess champion who has emerged as the most prominent leader of the opposition alliance.
Police said 170 people had been detained but a Kasparov aide, Marina Litvinovich, said as many as 600 were — although about half were released quickly. Kasparov, whom witnesses said was seized as he tried to lead a small group of demonstrators through lines of police ringing the square, was freed late Saturday after he was fined $38 for participating in the rally.
"It is no longer a country ... where the government tries to pretend it is playing by the letter and spirit of the law," Kasparov said outside the court building, appearing unfazed by his detention.
"We now stand somewhere between Belarus and Zimbabwe," he said.
It was the fourth time in recent months that anti-Putin demonstrations — all called Dissenters Marches — have been broken up with force or smothered by a huge police presence.
The weekend's marches were being closely watched as a barometer of how much of a threat, if any, opposition forces pose to the Kremlin as Russia prepares for parliamentary elections in December and a presidential vote next spring.
Putin, whose second and last term ends in 2008, has created an obedient parliament and his government has reasserted control over major television networks, giving little air time to critics.
TV newscasts on Saturday reported the protests, but gave as much or more time to a pro-Kremlin youth rally held near Moscow State University.
Later, police charged into a crowd of about 200 demonstrators outside the police precinct where Kasparov was being held, beating protesters with nightsticks and fists.
Kasparov and his allies mustered, by their own reckoning, about 2,000 people — far fewer than the 30,000 people who patronize the McDonald's restaurant at Pushkin Square on an average day.
But some protesters said they were not discouraged by the small turnout or intimidated by the overwhelming force marshaled to block the rally.
Andrei Illarionov, a former Putin economic adviser who has become a Kremlin critic, pointed out that in 1968 only six people appeared in Red Square to protest the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia.
"This is a crime against the Russian constitution," he said. "This country is not free anymore and the main criminal in Russia right now is the authorities."
About 100 of the detained protesters belong to the ultranationalist National Bolshevik Party, party spokesman Alexander Averi said. But he said Eduard Limonov, the novelist who heads the party known for street theater and political pranks aimed at Putin, evaded a detention attempt.
Organizers sought permission to gather on Pushkin Square, a traditional site for protests, but city officials rejected the request. Instead, they approved Turgenev Square, about a mile east and away from the city's commercial and cultural hub. 
Organizers refused to cancel plans for the Pushkin Square rally and protesters started to arrive before 11 a.m. Police began seizing them a few at a time. 
A 23-year-old woman, who gave her name only as Maria, said she and her husband, Andrei, were coming out of the subway when officers grabbed him. 
"We didn't do anything," she said, tears rolling down her face as she watched her husband being hustled into a police truck. "We just wanted to see what would happen." 
Viktor Vinokourov, a 67-year-old pensioner, watched the detentions from a nearby sidewalk, holding a hand-scrawled sign declaring: "I Don't Agree." A young man in a leather coat, apparently a plainclothes security officer, snatched it out of his hands. 
Around noon, several hundred protesters headed away from Pushkin Square toward the sanctioned demonstration site, marching past startled motorists while chanting "Putin get out!" and "We need a new Russia!" 
As they walked arm-in-arm down a main thoroughfare, a police cordon blocked their path. Some in the crowd ran forward and police charged, their truncheons flailing. 
A Japanese journalist suffered a gash on the head and was treated by a policeman in a riot helmet. Eventually the crowd of protesters melted into side streets, and joined about 1,000 demonstrators at the authorized site. 
Hundreds of police and soldiers surrounded the square, but let demonstrators in after checking them for weapons. 
Mikhail Kasyanov, Putin's first prime minister but now a leading opponent, denounced the arrests and beatings in a speech at Turgenev Square. 
"Everyone should ask the question: What is happening with our authorities — are they still sane, or have they gone mad?" he said, as the crowd chanted "Shame on the government." 
Moscow Mayor Yuri Luzhkov, who observed the march, said authorities were only trying to maintain order, not to interfere with the exercising of political rights. 
"We live in a democratic country, a free country, and we give the possibility to everybody to express their agreement or disagreement," he said, in remarks carried on Russia's Channel 1 television. 
--Parker007 01:28, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protesters beaten, detained in Moscow 

message: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (common names) --Parker007 01:37, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the article to Dissenters March, as that is the official name per the news agency Associated Press (AP). --Parker007 18:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Name - Policy 

message: *oppose UCF and Other Russia are different things, different organizations. Moreover, UCF (as well as National Bolsheviks etc.)  has never undertaken to be a member of the OR forever. Or do we have to merge Illinois and United States, or China and United Nations? As to the Dissenters' March, it has much to do e.g. with [Yabloko]], which in turn is not especially related to the Other Russia, etc. etc. Each of the articles has (or should have) some content that has nothing to do with the others. Colchicum 20:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, could anybody please write sections on December 2006 and April 2007 rallies? The article has been renamed to Dissenters March, so it is not fair to describe only the protest of March 3 anymore.Colchicum 20:16, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And on March 24, there was a March of the Dissenters in Nizhny Novgorod, which is not even mentioned in this article.... which for some reason was recently renamed... sigh... --Camptown 22:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

text: It could be argued, and, in fact, already has been argued (by myself and Colchicum), that the UCF and Other Russia are unique organizations which are playing an active part in the opposition movement in Russia.  As for Other Russia, well, the BBC certainly believes that it is worth discussing.  As for the UCF, well, most Western News coverage on the Russian opposition movement focuses explicitly on Kasparov; as such, an article for the UCF--Kasparov's organization--is both acceptable and rational. Finally, nearly all of the articles on Wiki have started as "pathetic stubs."  Future articles do not need to germinate in related articles, they can grow at their own rate on their own page...--(Ptah, the El Daoud 22:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Notability of protest doesn't depend directly on the number of protesters. But we are not discussing merger of articles about protests, we are discussing this protest + two organizations: Other Russia + United Civil Front. The Other Russia is certainly notable enough to deserve a separate article (as many of its members and leaders are very notable and even have their articles on Wikipedia, its conference in 2006 was attended by the British ambassador, which has been subject to "criticism" by Nashi, widely discussed in Western media etc. It would be stupid if someone looking for this info was redirected to the Dissenters' March. And if someone is trying to make the protest look either more or less important by the proposed merger, it is also a waste of time. Colchicum 17:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging proposal

message: Wasn't the title Saint Petersburg March of the Discontented more an appropriate name of this article? --Camptown 22:48, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You forgot Moscow ? --PFHLai 13:14, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saint Petersburg March of the Discontented 

message: Would a kind soul write about the yesterday Moscow Dissenters March? and Nizhny Novgord one?
I am not sure if we want to have one article per march or one full. Alex Bakharev 01:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A kind soul has indeed added quite a bit on last weekend's events in Moscow. It's now featured on ITN. --PFHLai 15:38, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a lot! Alex Bakharev 06:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moscow Dissenters March? Nizhny Novgorod Dissenters March? 

message: There is recently added a highly POV section named Public reaction that stromgly smell of original research and misrepresenting sources.
Reference http://washingtontimes.com/world/20060416-110141-1957r.htm tells nothing about Kasparov nor about the March. Also there is a tradition on Wiki not to consider Washington Times as a reliable source. It only talks about Kasyanov. 
The second and the third paragraph have no sources at all. 
That some LJ posting made it onto the top30 Ru-Lj postings at a day says nothing about its reliability. The only other source to the fourth paragraph has irc-online in its html address so it is no more reliable than lj.
The fifth paragraph is an attributed opinion.
Halh of the sixth pargraph (not related to Sokolov) is an unattributed opinion. There is no single positive public opinion present, while most of the opinion of Western media and Russian blogosphere I have chacked was usually positive (or at least negative towards the heavy-handed opposition to the Marches. 
I have not removed the piece, but unless it significantly improved and sourced I will remove it tommorrow. Alex Bakharev 08:12, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Not only this fragment is extremely POV, but it is not supported by any good references except a satire article written by pro-Putin journalist Maksim Sokolov (who works in Gazprom-own newspaper). I would remove this piece right now. This segment was discussed previously, and no good references are still provided. Actually, looking at discussions here and discussions between Colhicum and Vlad at Alex talk page, I understand why nobody wants to write about new dissenter marches. Biophys 15:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I also agree. There's extremely POV section, and information about Kasparov etc hasn't relate to the March, and that information already are on Kasparov page. GoWest8 02:15, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public reactions 

message: Regarding Current Event Tag, I am assuming this is now no longer "Current Event". If you see in news regarding Russia you will find other news like Gazprom, or EU etc etc. I am proceeding with removing the Current Events Tag. --Parker007 11:51, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Event Tag 

message: Although I am glad the people who wrote this article have kept it mostly NPOV, I don't think it is necisry to get into so much detail (ie. "the police took the protesters megaphone and threw it against the nearby building, and then put the protester in a headlock as the crowd chanted 'Shame! Shame!...") QZXA2 19:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder what WP policies discourage adding details and how to make sure that certain details are unnecessary without getting into POV. The sentence you have cited is about Sergey Gulyayev, the chief organizer of the protest and then member of the city legislature, and is thus perfectly relevant. As of now, this article is certainly not excessively long and not difficult to load, so I see no reason to trim details. Colchicum 19:10, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unnecisary details 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Dissenters' March. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070314235206/http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/03/03/russia.protest.ap/index.html to http://edition.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/03/03/russia.protest.ap/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080113175651/http://www.cbc.ca:80/news/reportsfromabroad/spicer/20070416.html to http://www.cbc.ca/news/reportsfromabroad/spicer/20070416.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 20 external links on Dissenters' March. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930184713/http://www.sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=2&story_id=20914 to http://www.sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=2&story_id=20914
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928003334/http://www.sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=2&story_id=20313 to http://www.sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=2&story_id=20313
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070127033115/http://anpilov1917.narod.ru/ to http://anpilov1917.narod.ru/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070311013152/http://www.dpgazeta.ru/article/111194 to http://www.dpgazeta.ru/article/111194
*Added  tag to http://www.namarsh.ru/resolution.php
*Added  tag to http://www.sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=2&story_id=21111
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070519031719/http://www.kommersant.com/p759103/Dissenters_March%2C_Moscow%2C_Kasparov%2C_Kasyanov/ to http://www.kommersant.com/p759103/Dissenters_March%2C_Moscow%2C_Kasparov%2C_Kasyanov/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070519031719/http://www.kommersant.com/p759103/Dissenters_March%2C_Moscow%2C_Kasparov%2C_Kasyanov/ to http://www.kommersant.com/p759103/Dissenters_March%2C_Moscow%2C_Kasparov%2C_Kasyanov/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930182822/http://www.svobodanews.ru/articlete.aspx?exactdate=20070416114858820 to http://www.svobodanews.ru/articlete.aspx?exactdate=20070416114858820
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070519031719/http://www.kommersant.com/p759103/Dissenters_March%2C_Moscow%2C_Kasparov%2C_Kasyanov/ to http://www.kommersant.com/p759103/Dissenters_March%2C_Moscow%2C_Kasparov%2C_Kasyanov/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070519031719/http://www.kommersant.com/p759103/Dissenters_March%2C_Moscow%2C_Kasparov%2C_Kasyanov/ to http://www.kommersant.com/p759103/Dissenters_March%2C_Moscow%2C_Kasparov%2C_Kasyanov/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930201645/http://www.sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=2&story_id=21339 to http://www.sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=2&story_id=21339
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930182822/http://www.svobodanews.ru/articlete.aspx?exactdate=20070416114858820 to http://www.svobodanews.ru/articlete.aspx?exactdate=20070416114858820
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070519031719/http://www.kommersant.com/p759103/Dissenters_March%2C_Moscow%2C_Kasparov%2C_Kasyanov/ to http://www.kommersant.com/p759103/Dissenters_March%2C_Moscow%2C_Kasparov%2C_Kasyanov/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070501083326/http://www.sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=2&story_id=21340 to http://www.sptimes.ru/index.php?action_id=2&story_id=21340
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110901190921/http://voronezh.rfn.ru/rnews.html?id=41983&cid=7 to http://voronezh.rfn.ru/rnews.html?id=41983&cid=7
*Added  tag to http://www.france24.com/france24Public/en/news/world/20071125-russia-garry-kasparov-arrested-moscow-opposition-protest.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111009162943/http://nazbol.ru/galery/48.html to http://nazbol.ru/galery/48.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090604004840/http://www.nazbol.ru/galery/49.html to http://nazbol.ru/galery/49.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061119104515/http://www2.minfin.ru/stabfond_eng/stabfond_eng.htm to http://www1.minfin.ru/stabfond_eng/stabfond_eng.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101229114953/http://community.livejournal.com/namarsh_ru/ to http://community.livejournal.com/namarsh_ru/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070515142914/http://neznaika-nalune.livejournal.com/243762.html to http://neznaika-nalune.livejournal.com/243762.html
*Added  tag to http://www.mosnews.com/news/2007/03/04/march.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070514140146/http://www.unknownnews.org/070414-Moscow.html to http://www.unknownnews.org/070414-Moscow.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Dissenters' March. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930182954/http://www.kommersant.com/p747407/r_527/march_protest/ to http://www.kommersant.com/p747407/r_527/march_protest/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930153824/http://www.kommersant.com/p748915/Other_Russia_march_/ to http://www.kommersant.com/p748915/Other_Russia_march_/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930190937/http://www.kommersant.com/p-10555/r_500/Dissenters_marches_Berezovsky/ to http://www.kommersant.com/p-10555/r_500/Dissenters_marches_Berezovsky/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061119104515/http://www2.minfin.ru/stabfond_eng/stabfond_eng.htm to http://www1.minfin.ru/stabfond_eng/stabfond_eng.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930182954/http://www.kommersant.com/p747407/r_527/march_protest/ to http://www.kommersant.com/p747407/r_527/march_protest/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:17, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dissenters' March. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605021357/http://www.newizv.ru/news/2007-03-06/64778 to http://www.newizv.ru/news/2007-03-06/64778
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070829104355/http://www.russ.ru/layout/set/print/politics/docs/rybij_marsh to http://www.russ.ru/layout/set/print//politics/docs/rybij_marsh
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Dissenters' March. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070920222837/http://www.spb.yabloko.ru/pbl/persons/119.php to http://www.spb.yabloko.ru/pbl/persons/119.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070515015543/http://friday.vedomosti.ru/article.shtml?2007%2F04%2F13%2F9273 to http://friday.vedomosti.ru/article.shtml?2007%2F04%2F13%2F9273
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)