Talk:Bucharest Metro

message: In response to the statements above about M1/M3 being reversed, I've made a new network map. The stations are a bit unclear though, because the map is originally of a very large size. I will try to make it so that the station names show up a bit more clearly. Ronline 05:15, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The new map does not include some stations, such as Mihai Bravu and Timpuri Noi (between Dristor and Piaţa Unirii).bogdan ʤjuʃkə | Talk 14:19, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for telling me! I forgot to put them in. Will do very soon. Ronline 14:20, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: Am făcut o hartă nouă cu Piaţa Victoriei... sper că este completă! Despre reţeaua propusă de CFR, ai mai multe informaţii? Ar fi bine dacă am face deja planul pentru această linie, în gri, pe linia de metrou... asta nu se poate numai dacă ştim staţiile. Eu nu am auzit de aşa plan până acum, dar ar fi ceva fantastic pentru Bucureşti. În final o cale ferată stil RER! Ronline 03:37, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New metro map

message: I understand the Bucharest Metro is pretty special in that every station is unique. Each one has a different style and different arhitecture. I found no mention in the article about this or the arhitecture of the network. 
Is this true?
:Very true. Ranging from stations with pillars to stations held by arches, such as Titan Station. Some stations have similar architecture, mosaic tiles can be seen in many old stations. The M3 Line (more like the new part of it, towards Anghel Saligny) features a clean, simple, modern two-colour design. 188.26.170.0 (talk) 02:37, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arhitecture 

message: On the whole this is a good article; however, there are some strongly POV statements that need to be redacted in my opinion.  I, for one, do not find things in Metro stations like mosaics to be "useless", I find them often to be quite attractive.  Whether they are or are not is a matter of taste and viewpoint and hence does not belong in a NPOV article, only the facts with regard to their presence or absence does.  For now, I will attempt to limit my editing to the putting of passages into what I regard to be more formalised and idiomatic English; please feel free to improve on this.  Rlquall 21:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: The list of train names just keeps getting bigger and I don't think it is that important. Plus, it is not very accurate: some trains bearing capital city names are actually traveling on M2 instead of M1/M3 (Paris and Helsinki). We should remove the list or place it in a more obscure place.  apancu | Talk 20:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling Stock 

message: The current plans map is SF and totally incorrect. (File:Harta reţelei bucureştene de metrou (actuale şi planificate).GIF). It does not present the correct routes of the 4 planed lines and extensions of the present ones. Most of the lines there haven't even been envisioned by the management of Metrorex. It's some guy's wet dream, and a bad one at that.
A correct map is the following:
Plans map  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayceman (talk • contribs) 15:46, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future lines map 

message: "The expected construction cost is 740 euros. " That's pretty cheap for 18 km... [/sarcasm].  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.12.173.164 (talk) 11:56, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for spotting the typo.  Expected construction cost corrected to 740 million euros as per referenced article. --Chaleyer61 (talk) 12:08, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  M5 cost? 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/bucharest-metro/
*:Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 12:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bucharest Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130121054611/http://metrou.woopish.ro/ to http://metrou.woopish.ro
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090818231428/http://metrou.transira.ro:80/ to http://metrou.transira.ro
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:55, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bucharest Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140809182904/http://metroubucuresti.webs.com/istoric.htm to http://metroubucuresti.webs.com/istoric.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://metrou.transira.ro/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Given that the article is about the metro would a map that features the metro lines be more appropriate? Johnotm (talk) 00:19, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map