lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Khazars in fiction

message: I am the creator of several of the items on the original list at Khazaria.com, so I am at least partial copyright holder. I have spoken with the owner of that site, Kevin Brook, and he has authorized its use. He will be on here shortly to confirm. --Briangotts 03:08, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)

message: Any specific reason, why Arthur Koestler is not listed? His book is clearly a work of fiction, so it should be here. Comments? --Johannes Rohr 20:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Arthur Koestler wrote The Thirteenth Tribe as a work of non-fiction. However flawed it is (and those flaws are discussed at (Khazars), it is not clearly a work of fiction; quite the contrary, as Koestler wanted to be taken seriously as a historical researcher. Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 20:15, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Koestler? 

message: My apologies. On a previous edit I had placed a "context" tag in error. What i had intended to apply was a "wikify" tag. In particular, I am concerned about the opening sentences, as discussed in the Guide to Layout. I'd attend to it myself, but know so little about the subject. Again, apologies.Victoriagirl 17:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikify tag

message: Is there any special reason for the works to be listed in a reverse chronological order? it seems to me more logical to start with Yehuda Halevi and go on down the generations, giving a coherent picture of the theme's development through the ages until the present, and not regress from the present to the remote past.Adam keller 22:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why a reverse chronological order?

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20041208190925/http://www.khazaria.com/fiction.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:00, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Darwinian Happiness

message: The result of the VFD can be found here: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Darwinian Happiness  -- AllyUnion (talk) 03:15, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VFD Result 

message: The very idea presented here seems closely linked to earlier such attempts well known in ethics and criticized by some. See Naturalistic fallacy, and Is–ought problem. --Ivbauer (talk) 11:00, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Wine in New Bottles?
Talk:David Douglass (physicist)

message: The result of the VFD can be found here: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/David Douglass -- AllyUnion (talk) 03:40, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VFD Result 

message: Section = 109 BLP articles labelled "Climate Change Deniers" all at once. This article was placed in a "climate change deniers" category. After discussion on WP:BLPN and WP:CFD the category was deleted. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 16:31, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: BLP noticeboard
Talk:Hvar

message: Hvar is not an appropriate name for the history section. The croats are invaders and this is a fact. The original name is Pharos/Pharia and more appropriate for history and legibility.Meroitte (talk) 07:59, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "That is a fact" - wikipedia isn't a product of assertions. Please provide a source, and a rationale for not using its current, common name. The history section cites the former name Pharos (the greeks, also invaders), Illyrians, and the unnamed neolithic peoples before that.  cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 18:09, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Alcmene

message: Alcmene, or Alkmênê ("might of the moon") was, in ancient Greek mythology, the daughter of Electryon, king of Mycenae, and wife of 
Amphitryon
Amphitryon, or Amphitrion, in Greek mythology, was a son of Alcaeus, king of Tiryns in Argolis.
Wife is a son ?
There are alot of inconsistencies in the whole Hercules birth on the front page Aurora236 (talk) 22:53, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: "However, the god in Delphi gave the Heracleidae an oracle that it was better to bury Alcmene in Megara." Who is the god here?
ICE77 (talk) 00:26, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  God in Delphi 

message: maybe there should be link so that if someone searches for Alkmene (as I did) they would have a redirect to this article? DavidRBarker (talk) 23:44, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  add a link?
Talk:Adrian Durham

message: The result of the VFD can be found here: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Adrian Durham -- AllyUnion (talk) 03:56, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VFD Result 

message: I mean, just read the thing.  This is about as not-neutral as you can get. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.68.50.127 (talk) 11:16, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Issue 

message: He must have won this.
Yep loads of times. The ginger numpty.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.166.192.77 (talk) 17:42, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wind Up Merchant Of The Year Award 

message: This article needs editing. TALKSPORT announced in August 2021 that Adrian Durham would be taking over coverage of live football. It was added that Durham would still host one Drive programme per week. Link provided. WoodySu2022 (talk) 18:38, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  https://talksport.com/football/efl/929123/adrian-durham-talksport-live-football-efl-coverage/
Talk:Vrbas Banovina

message: Could person that added the population data also provide the source.  It seems unusual that the population number of the region in 1931 remained nearly the same until 1991. (the region numbered little over 1 million in 1991).  Also clarify if the census of 1931 (if that is where the data came from) counted religious groups only.  --Dado 04:09, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not aware of the banovinas still existing in 1991 so I can not say what the banovina's population was in 1991 but the 1931 figures are probably from the census which recorded the population's religion and mother tongue.
change of banovina's borders in first Yugoslavia , --Čeha (razgovor) 10:59, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Population Data
Talk:EasyOffice Freeware

message: The reformatting was good, I made a bit of a hash of it myself. Is there a policy against including reviews in external links? If there is, I'll leave the review links here: About.com review: http://desktoppub.about.com/cs/software/gr/easyofficefree.htm, PC Magazine review: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1699381,00.asp - if anybody wants to write a bit more, the reviews are quite a good place to look beyond the marketing "puff". --VivaEmilyDavies 15:23, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Category talk:College sports venues in the United States

message: Just a quandary here.  Are we going to (again) have confusion over the term "athletics", whether speaking in an American or British sense.  I understand that these are referring to American venues, but I just know someone will come along and decide that they all need to be fixed (to conform with the British sense that athletics refers only to track and field activities).  Flyers13 04:17, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:William Hoskins

message: The result of the VFD can be found here: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/William Hoskins -- AllyUnion (talk) 04:30, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Article was marginally kept at VfD (now AfD, but later merged to BSD license (see page history) because it had not improved in years. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 17:46, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  VFD Result
Talk:S. I. Newhouse School of Public Communications

message: I didn't know that Pei designed schools.  Perhaps the writer meant that he designed the school building?  18.26.0.18 04:43, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The most predidgeous school of journalism? Considered by who?-— Preceding unsigned comment added by NeoNerd (talk • contribs) 18:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eh?

message: Is it "S.I." or "S. I."? Article needs consistency with title.
Jarfingle 00:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title? 

message: The parent article on Syracuse U states that the school of journalism was founded in 1934.  This article states 1964 and refers to LBJ doing the dedication.  Which is correct?  Is the Newhouse erected on the foundation (so to speak) of a pre-existing School of Journalism, renamed in recognition of his gift?71.234.215.23 (talk) 16:08, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dedication 

message: I went through and removed a lot of what sounded like it must have been listed from the school's promotional pieces.  valereee (talk) 15:33, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Much of article reads like school's promo brochure

message: @Bumm13, you recently moved this article to add a space between the S and the I, to "conform to Wikipedia naming conventions" (which you don't link). This has created a discrepancy between the title of the article and the title of its category, and reverses the move @Johnnycorns5354 made back in September to remove the space, which he said was "inconsistent with typical usage".
Can you two please discuss to resolve this issue, and then ensure that the page and category titles match?  talk 19:40, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Mvcg66b3r, you're now joining the club with your recent move. Can we please have some communication and consensus-building rather than a slow-motion edit war?  talk 07:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space in name
Talk:Systems Union

message: The result of the VFD can be found here: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Systems Union -- AllyUnion (talk) 04:54, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VFD Result 

message: Deletion was proposed on 23 Sep 2007 because: 
:Despite old VfD, does not assert its importance through any other sources than itself, has practically no non-commercial content. "Notability" in VfD was assessed by Google search, which is not kosher, especially for such common words as systems and union... 
:Hasn't had any decent addition in 18 months, still a stub, time to delete
I came to this page in order to remove the PROD, as I think the company is sufficently notable to have an article, giving the history of the company or its main products, of which Sun Accounts is a market leader in the non-profit sector.  I don't actually use the latter but I know it is notable. It would be useful and encyclopedic to distinguish it from Sun Microsystems. 
However, this page had no content worth keeping. I have therefore redirected it to the new holding company Infor Global Solutions, leaving the categories on the redirect page.  This is without prejudice to someone writing a proper article in future. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion
Talk:Islam in Oman

message: I have edited some information about Oman which is not accurate. Some vocabulary were used that are not used anymore so I edited them with modern words.
The mosque certainly does not encompass 25 square miles. I doubt it cover even one. Can someone help here?--Rjstott 19:48, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I wanted to use this article for a translation in French, but the quality is very poor : no history, no neutrality, no source for the figures,... I advice french-speaking people to have a look at the french article. Ghalloun (talk) 09:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of the article 

message: Currently using CIA factbook (2020 religion estimates) as source and that says 45% of population. A discussion over at Talk:Arab world#Mistake in Omani Ibadi Percentage list some sources that that article uses for a 75% population. (based on 2006 Middle East Patterns)(based on 1998 WSJ Almanac)(2000 Encyclopedia of World Political Systems) Probably should discuss. Even though there are more sources for 75%, the CIA factbook is most recent number. WikiVirusC(talk) 19:28, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ibadi Population
Talk:Tom Thumb

message: What are the "Cornish Thumb Chronicles"? I've Googled and this is the only source I see for anything like that. For that matter, who are Paul Campbell and Richard Battye? Campingtrent (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Cornish Thumbs"?

message: Should the second half of this article be used for an article entitled "General Tom Thumb"? His birthday's tomorrow (Feb 11), and I noticed that the link to his name is red. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Popageorgio  (talk • contribs) 05:05, 10 February 2005
: Done - although I can't find the birthday link you talk about. - DavidWBrooks 14:18, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: Meaning Gargantua ? That one ? --Jerome Potts (talk) 13:18, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. But in the chapbook it's spelled Garagantua. Campingtrent (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Garagantua"? 

message: Can someone please explain the opening sentence - "Tom Thumb is a character of Tomas".  It really doesn't make any sense, by not explaining the "Tomas" reference.  The link goes to a disambig page.  Elsquared (talk) 05:37, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  explain opening sentence? 

message: One can always count on Wikipedia to inject the word "fart" with a link the the "fart" page as if we need one into a simple article about a character like Tom Thumb.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.51.22.203 (talk) 22:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good ole Wikipedia
Talk:Mr. Horse

message: The result of the VFD can be found here: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Mr. Horse -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:08, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VFD Result 

message: This page was nominated for deletion. The result was no consensus. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr. Horse · Katefan0(scribble) 19:22, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD
Talk:Lorna Nogueira

message: The result of the VFD can be found here: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Lorna Nogueira/vote1 -- AllyUnion (talk) 05:09, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  VFD Result 

message: This article was again listed for deletion on 10 April, 2005. The discussion was closed with the result of no consensus.  This article will not be deleted.  You can view the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Lorna Nogueira/vote2.  --Tony Sidaway|Talk 13:31, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I count 14 deletes and 7 keeps (if the keep vote by the user who registered after the voting began is discounted, as is general policy), which to me seems like a consensus to delete. -R. fiend 20:40, 4 May 2005 (UTC)

text: That isn't enough to form a rough consensus according to my way of reckoning it.  Although the 66% figure is much bandied-about, it's very much a minimum acceptable value and I would never, ever use a figure that low as rough consensus for deletion. I'd be looking for something in the range 75%+ before considering calling it a rough consensus. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 19:37, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Closed deletion listing 2

message: This article was again listed for deletion on 22 May 2005.  The discussion was closed with the result no consensus.  This article will not be deleted. You can view the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Lorna Nogueira/vote3.  --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 08:40, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Closed deletion listing 3
Talk:Acatenango

message: The "Hiking the Volcano" section of the article reads as followed:
For visitors to Antigua in Guatemala; Acatenango Volcano and the neighbouring Volcan de Fuego (Fire Volcano) can be an irresistible adventure. While it would be unsafe and irresponsible to hike the active Volcan de Fuego, it is possible to hike to the summit of Acatenango and watch Fuego erupt from a safe distance. It is a tough hike up steep slopes with loose volcanic rocks and the altitude can be a challenge for some. There are different options, 1 day or 2 days tours available from Antigua. To get the most from the hike, it is best to spend the night on the volcano, so that it is possible to see Fuego erupt at night, when it is most impressive. Make sure you research the tour company you are doing your trek with well – six tourists died of exposure on Acatenango in January 2017
It just seems to me to be like it is giving advice and does not appear to do so in the unbiased fashion typical of Wikipedia. If you disagree, it is just what I initially thought.
Maybe someone else could have a look at it and fix it up?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acatenango
Osariik (talk) 08:30, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hiking the Volcano" 

message: My friend, you've got to be kidding.  Wikipedia is a hotbed of page nazis and government edits have been documented.  Fact check this!  As for this article, is typical of Wikipedia.  The last sentence is false, as the dead visitors to Acatenango were all Guatemalan, and not tourists.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.148.78.120 (talk) 02:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unbiased fashion typical of Wikipedia"
Talk:Pacaya

message: This article received its Good Article rating on 23 October 2005 from an editor who hearkened back to a kinder, gentler era when it was not outside of norms to just simply plonk down a Good Article tag for no other reason than WP:ILIKEIT. Alas, the standards for retaining this pretty green trinket have tightened over time; in the present regime, someone unassociated with writing this article (a reviewer) should examine the article with respect to the good article criteria and, on the various standards cited, expresses up, down, or neutral sentiments, plus an aggregate sentiment, upon which retaining the pretty little trinket relies. 
By posting this remark here, I'm not suggesting that the article has gone bad or presently fails the criteria, but I am noting the absence of a review that is a hallmark of the present process, and, in the fullness of time, a review should be performed on this article. With the absence of a review, this article is a delisting candidate. Note that, for an editor to delist this article, the due-diligence of a good article review is required. Otherwise, how might a delisting editor justify his or her delisting, or offer cogent reasons why the Good Article mark should remain? In either case, anything short of a fair review is unfair to editors who contribute to this article regularly and in good faith. Drop any questions about this on my talk page. Take care — Gosgood 22:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article review needed 

message: The "Recent eruptions" section currently contains very little about recent eruptions. For a while it contained simply "It is currently erupting" with no punctuation and no explanation. It should perhaps be changed to "Tourism" and any eruption facts added to the "Geological history" section. Some sources for eruption history:
* Monthly report of Pacaya
* Pacaya activity updates
CristoperB (talk) 14:18, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Recent eruptions" section 

message: I added inline citations for this article. When I found the article, it had zero inline citations. There are no inline citations for a source by the American Geophysical Union. How does it fit into the references list using the  template? TravelAuthor (talk) 08:29, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  inline citations 
Talk:Santa María (volcano)

message: Why is this named Santamaría instead of Santa María? Anyone knows? PatríciaR
: The correct name is Santa María not Santamaria - I am Guatemalan jabserrano msg 13:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: This page should be renamed to "Santa María (volcano)", as previously noted by other users. Any objections? Simon Burchell (talk) 23:46, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename page

message: GVP says it is a lava dome, so I will change that. 
-- Guanlong wucaii  —Preceding undated comment added 08:19, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santiaguito 

message: a time stamped photo was posted on a blog but I guess that's not a good source, unfortunately my spanish is not good enough to read the bulletin on INSIVUMEH EdwardLane (talk) 08:24, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Santiaguito is constantly erupting - it is one of the most active volcanoes in the world. I think the INSIVUMEH observatory just snapped a nice pic and posted it, I checked out their website and it looks like they just post the latest pics of eruptions. There's certainly nothing unusual going on that requires an article update. All the best, Simon Burchell (talk) 08:36, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: ah that makes sense - thanks EdwardLane (talk) 10:29, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small eruption today 
Talk:Kalsubai

message: The current main image does not clearly identify where the peak is in the picture, or whether it was taken from atop the mountain. 
--223.232.228.132 (talk) 08:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better image/caption? 
Talk:Mount Agung

message: maybe this worth mentioning that a bookstore use Mount Agung as a namesake. w_tanoto (talk) 04:39, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Toko Buku Gunung Agung

message: 3142 m is definitely wrong, the 3030 m elevation at peakbagger is correct. I have checked both SRTM and ASTER  GDEM, the former has a highest 3" cell of 3017 m. There are no-data areas in SRTM, but GDEM clearly shows that these fall within a crater. Unless there are any objections I will amend the elevation. Viewfinder (talk) 15:20, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Badan Geologi (Geological Agency) writing 3,014 m elevation. --Batholith (talk) 08:54, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Elevation

message: There was a small phreatic eruption reported at 09:05, 21 Nov 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  phreatic (?) eruption today
Talk:Mount Bromo

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: No consensus for move. Issues with the scope of the article can be addressed through normal editing. Ucucha 00:33, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Mount Bromo →  — Mount Bromo is merely a feature of Tengger caldera.. —Guanlong wucaii 15:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Noone was killed or injured during the Bromo eruption.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.29.66.254 (talk) 18:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move  

message: can someone update this page?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.15.85.225 (talk) 04:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mt Bromo is erupting again 
Talk:Galunggung

message: Hello, would someone please record and upload the pronunciation of "Galunggung"? Thanks!--Reem Al-Kashif (talk) 11:53, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronunciation 