Talk:Don't Stop Me Now

message: Hi! I've added a 21-second sample of the song, though I did the beginning part. Should I have done a different part of the song? —THIS IS MESSEDOCKER (TALK) 06:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the beginning is fine. Thanks for your time :).—♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 07:26, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound sample 

message: In video Deacon sings backing vocals. Did he do that in record, too? --87.110.80.44 (talk) 16:16, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Deacon never sang on a record. Queenie 21:09, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vocals 

message: Removed information pertaining to the 'Learn by Doings' cover of the song, according to its download page, its chart peak is 607, hardly notable I would argue.
-- ckydavies 01:13 GMT, 20 Dec, 2008
Thats a great exsample don't stop me now is my best song  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.139.31 (talk) 19:18, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Notable Covers 

message: Why did Brian May hate the song? BulsaraAndDeacon (talk) 17:33, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  May's Dislike? 

message: Should some mention be made of Russell Brand's claim that this song was written after Freddie spent a night with 80 rent boys? It's in Booky Wook 2 - a source:
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/lifestyle/article-23883686-the-celebrities-strike-back-in-the-bookshops.do
I have no idea about the validity of this claim but I guess it should be looked into with a view to considering it for the article.
Nottrobin (talk) 14:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  80 rent boys 

message: How can a 1979 song be on a 1978 album? :-)
Also anyone see a connection between this page and Hank Green's An Absolutely Remarkable Thing??  Yagirlfromanotherworld (talk) 23:04, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Space time continuum... 

message: This recent news was added and reverted. A further source has the headline,  "Scientists say this is the most feel-good song ever written". Should it be mentioned in the article? Burninthruthesky (talk) 09:55, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We can mention it, but the study isn't very scientific itself... the scientist just took a poll from random people with no consideration of their age (if you just peek at the top 10 list you can easily understand that it's not a list that someone under age 30 could have compiled), no control group and without laying a common background, and concluded that "fast songs charges you up more than slow ones". So... yea, that's it. ~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.30.95.174 (talk) 17:03, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most feel-good song ever 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Don't Stop Me Now. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110817060045/http://itunes.apple.com:80/gb/album/jazz-remastered/id440499309 to http://itunes.apple.com/gb/album/jazz-remastered/id440499309
*Added  tag to http://www.magicmusic.net/blog/6/entry-90-pixar-play-parade/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Can I add the fact that this song is scientifically proven to be the most feel good song of all time?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3238679/Queen-s-Don-t-Stop-feel-good-song-past-50-years-scientific-formula-proved-it.html
I feel like in adding it I might be violating the neutral POV, so I just want to be sure
AbdulAliAbdullah (talk) 03:14, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This seems like an interesting fact 

message: New to editing... May I suggest the following addition to the "In popular culture" section - 
Team GB used the song in a video following the 2012 London Olympic Games
There are several links to the video including https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWMySZa0TzQ&usg=AFQjCNEkRX7cCje6g842NG-aSxm1BtNXJg Icebsa (talk) 06:52, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The song was also featured in the trailers for Hardcore Henry and Plants Vs. Zombies: Garden Warfare 2. AFluffyMuffin (talk) 22:32, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture... 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Don't Stop Me Now. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930145815/http://www.queenzone.com/news/queen-win-top-gears-best-driving-song-ever-poll.aspx to http://www.queenzone.com/news/queen-win-top-gears-best-driving-song-ever-poll.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:34, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I noticed that next to the length of the song it says '7/Album Version. Is there any particular reason for this? As far as I know the album and single versions were the same length, so why is it significant to mention that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by UndoubtedlyMe (talk • contribs) 15:55, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the difference? 

message: For context: The recently (Sept 25th) released book An Absolutely Remarkable Thing has this Wikipedia article as a plot point. On page 28 of the hardcover (I just bought and started reading it) the protagonist is reading the article and notices a typo in the lead, and when she tries to fix it a new typo mysteriously appears instead, and that repeats once again. The recent vandalism has been adding those 4 typos. I haven't read beyond that (plus I don't want to spoil the unrelated-to-this-article book plot on the talkpage here) so I'm not sure how it develops from there. Now, the author of the book is a powerful force for good in this world (free educational materials, charitable work, and much more), so I'm only slightly frustrated at him that the novel is leading to minor vandalism. However, it is likely to continue at a low ebb for the next few months. 
We might need to consider either longer-term semi-protection (thanks to user:Willondon and user:Ad Orientem for the current 2 day semi-protection :), or perhaps a temporary hidden-comment just above the first paragraph along the lines of  which might help dissuade most of these likely-first-time editors from petty vandalism. Perhaps we could even redirect their energy by adding "Maybe go fix a typo somewhere else?" or something. 
Just notes and thoughts. :) Quiddity (talk) 04:18, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh. No need to make a big deal out of this. If the problem persists protection can be restored/extended as needed. Just drop me a line if this resumes. See also WP:BEANS and WP:DENY. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:25, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the insight, Quiddity. I wondered why, of course. I thought it was maybe a giddy crowd-sourced campaign focussed ironically on "don't stop me now". I'm all for WP:BEANS and WP:DENY. If it's not a big thing, it won't be a big thing. I think we've all done well by Wikipedia. Willondon (talk) 05:55, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism coming from a book plot point 

message: In dem Lied kommt der Supersonic Man vor. Wurde das lied für diesen Film verwendet? Auch für "Shazam! Film" scheint er verwendet worde zu sein. --88.67.204.48 (talk) 15:56, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supersonic Man