lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:JD

message: Is there a way to subst the output of this template? I been trying with no success and I was wondering if anyone had any suggestions. --Shane (talk/contrib) 16:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subst: 

message: Ummm... Russian used the Julian calendar until 1918; I believe other countries switched in other years. The documentation seems to be for Britain only. Studerby (talk) 19:24, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Britain changed in 1752.Japf (talk) 21:56, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  1582
Talk:Elizabeth Stuart (disambiguation)

message: Man, we need an article on Charles I's daughter.  It's absurd that we have an article on her sister Anne, who died at the age of three, but not about her. john k 16:16, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ...

message: This pg is overlinked and needs a bit of work. However, it needs to be merged with Elizabeth Stuart as this is also a dab (though with less entries) and as there is not a primary focus, it should be at Elizabeth Stuart. Boleyn2 (talk) 13:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Bega River, Europe

message: I think that as more than 70% of the river flows through Romania (and less than 30% through Serbia), the name of the article should be Bega. Of course, there should also be a redirect page from Begej to Bega. Alexrap 16:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As in more than one week there was one agreement and no objection, I redirected this page to Bega. Alexrap 14:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Alexrap, in the future please use move function when you want to change name of the article, so that page history is preserved, ok? PANONIAN (talk) 16:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK. Also, I guess that the new name of the article that you have chosen is all right. Alexrap 11:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  When you use move function you can change article name only to name that was not used for another article. Since you created article named "Bega River (Romania and Serbia)" it was not possible to move original "Begej" article to that name and the current name was available, so I moved name to it. PANONIAN (talk) 13:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The name of the article
Template talk:Ambiguous

message: Btw, this template was voted for deletion about a year ago. Probably not a good idea to recreate it.   /FunkyFly.talk_  16:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah but it was a different kind of template back then and was used for policy pages. --WikiSlasher 08:56, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Why does this template link to Wikipedia:Disambiguation? 
That page is about providing links, making disambiguation pages and son, not fixing ambiguous statements. I don't believe there is an actual policy on ambiguity itself, but that page is completely irrelevant. It would make more sense to direct towards WP:Clarify and if there is no objection, this is what I have done. Repku (talk) 18:43, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking to Disambiguation  

message: What is the difference between this and ? --Mr. Guye (talk) 22:11, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This and {{t|Vague}}
Talk:Chester Ashley

message: Who Was Who in America lists him as being born on June 1, 1790 in Amherst, disagreeing with the text here both on the year and place.  Anyway to resolve it? Badbilltucker 16:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Born Where and When?
Talk:Project manager

message: More mention needs to be made of Project Managers working on software development. Mathiastck 16:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Managers working on software development 

message: This seems to me to be an odd term and one that I am not familiar with, I suspect it is US centric? I would think it should be Project Construction Manager instead. If it is meant to define a Project Manager in the Construction Industry, this seems to be a restrictive term, for this Article. What about the mining industry, the defence industry, the aeronautical industry, aluminium industry, heavy industry ETC. The Project Manager is usually from the client organisation not from the builder. The common thing about all of these industries is that their projects are project managed by engineers. So I think it shoud be Engineering, Architecture and Software in the lead, and form the sections in the body of this Article.
On this comment (from a UK perspective) the PM does not have to be from the client organisation - that appears to be an industry specific comment. There can be a client PM and even a prime contractor PM too sometimes (you can argue the rights and wrongs of that - I am not saying that is correct but it is common practice in some industries). In truth, there should only ever be one PM and those industries who call the client representative the PM are doing so incorrectly (see my comment on single point responsibility below).  Construction PM is not an odd term in the UK - it denotes the domain experience people are looking for. Similar to IT etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ktlonergan (talk • contribs) 21:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction Project Manager 

message: At the end of the page there is a reference labeled PMP to Project Management Professional which is unfortunately redirected to Project manager.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.107.191.217 (talk) 19:58, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self reference in the page

message: * In this edit text is copy/paste from the Project management article
* In this edit text is copy/paste from the Project management article
-- Mdd (talk) 12:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-paste registration
Talk:Siege of Petropavlovsk

message: Under "The Siege" it is stated of Rear-Admiral David Price, who was commanding the British fleet, "Almost immediately, Price went below decks and shot himself". Yet in David Price's wikipedia page, with reliable source, states that "on that morning admiral Price was killed by an discharge of his own pistol, either by accident or in a suicide attempt, dying some hours later". I feel this is an important difference. 92.3.234.9 (talk) 22:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: David Price

message: It seems this article is full of conjectures; reference and sources must be given, so that article can be validated. The fact that exactly 500 Brits and French died and exactly 100 Russians died is just obscene and least believable casualty report ever.Mic of orion (talk) 18:53, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What's wrong with the sources given in the References section?  From what I see, there's plenty to go on with verifying any statement this article makes.  As for the casualty report, I don't believe the numbers were intended to be exact; looks like they've been rounded to a nearest hundred.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 19:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

text: Sources are sources are sources.  As long as a source is considered reliable (by Wikipedia standards, not by your perceptions), it can be used, regardless of what language it is in.  The sources used in this article are definitely reliable (albeit not necessarily sufficient).  Also, if you do happen to have sources in a language other than Russian, by all means feel free add them, the article will only get better for it.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 23:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Source of reference

message: The article stated that the Allies broke off bombardment on 30 Aug, but returned "within two days on 31 Aug."  "Within two days" in that case is redundant, if not contradictory, so I took the liberty of removing the phrase.  If that constitutes "independent research," then I can cite Prof. Stephen Haycox, "Alaska," p.137, who says the bombardment took place on two consecutive days.
Terry J. Carter (talk) 23:21, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  31-30 = 1 

message: This article needs to harmonize the Julian and Gregorian dates. Also, it needs to add information about a formation of Russian forces. Russian sheeps Aurora and Dvina were not included in the Putyatin squadron. Putyatin was not in Petropavlovsk during the siege.Alligas (talk) 19:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think all of the dates in the article are in the Julian calendar? This needs to be clarified. DancesWithGrues (talk) 17:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harmonization and addition
Talk:Scott Gibbons

message: This page has been flagged for copyright infrigement. I wrote the original text that appears here, as well as elsewhere on the internet. I plan to Wikify it when I have time; meanwhile would you kindly re-instate it as the post is in fact owned by myself, the poster? thanks!
:I have deleted the article as a copyright violation.  If you are the copyright holder, please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems for instructions on how to grant Wikipedia permission to use the text.  You can then recreate the article. --Aguerriero (talk) 02:39, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Lilith (band) doesn't show evidence of indepedent notability, but the content could be maintained through a merge here. Klbrain (talk) 20:42, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Gastric bypass diet

message: reposted by Karwynn (talk) from project page
Doing some research I found this article on University of Wisconsin Bariatric Program Kind of strange they think it is so important to have pretty much the same information and yes the call it Gastric Bypass Diet...
UW Health Gastric Bypass Dietary program What is posted on the surgery page about nutrition after surgery is misleading inaduquate, and incorrect.
--Supplements 13:14, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the article seems to aim at promoting individual products, something that is frowned up here.  Karwynn (talk) 16:39, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: University of Wisconsin
Talk:Duck River (Tennessee)

message: I removed Lewisburg from the list of cities along the river as it is instead on Big Rock Creek, a tributary of the Duck, about ten miles south of the river itself.--Spewey 16:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is correct.  Rlquall 18:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lewisburg 

message: Added external link for the gauged flows via the USGS @ Columbia
I will add the rest of the gauges along the river as well.  
I think we should add any information and photos about the effects, peak flows and gauge heights of the May 2010 floods.  This will provide information about a major flood event witnessed by wiki members on this river.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riverross (talk • contribs) 19:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  USGS Real Time Water Data 
Talk:Mario no Photopi

message: I think the title of this article should be "Mario no Fotopii", because the Japanese title is マリオのふぉとぴー, where the last "dash" determines a prolonged vocal. The reason I want to change the Ph to F, is the fact that the latter part of the title is written in hiragana, and not katakana, like it usually would if it was an imported word. 
DJLarZ 21:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title? 

message: I've looked on ebay for this game, and its not there. Theres also no videos of it being played. Is this a VERY RARE game? How many copies has it sold? If it wasn'r rare, i would play it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.233.100.129 (talk) 23:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rarity?
Talk:Mike Piazza's StrikeZone

message: This article has been a stub for almost a year and a half, and hasn't been updated, and it's been redirected twice to the article about the baseball player Mike Piazza but however other then
In 1998, Mike Piazza's Strike Zone was released for the Nintendo 64, system.
that is all that mentions the game and the link has not even been made to the sub-section that mentions the game and the purpose of this article and any link for it would be for someone wanting more information about the game, my feelings are that if it is redirected it should at least have all the information listed here, including the info that is in the infobox, and a link to the proper place, and not so the person curious about the game has to search the entire article about the player to find out when the game was released. (Floppydog66 (talk) 15:22, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: merged into Mike Piazza article
Talk:Mission: Impossible (1998 video game)

message: Added a box art image for the Nintendo 64 version of the game.
AnubisAscended 04:13, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box art image 

message: Wasn't this game seriously delayed?
I think it's the same deal as with other bad movie adaptations like Back to the Future for the NES. --Green Hill (talk) 22:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delay 

message: the video game was released in 1998 on Nintendo 64, I remember that, websites such as MobyGames and on the Google search says that gamew was released in 1998. Egon Eagle (talk) 09:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Monopoly in video games

message: I don't like how the last paragraph is written. Someone please fix it. Shrumster 20:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisions

message: This page is one of the worst I have seen on Wikipedia.
Why is the newest version included in this page and not given it's own page?
Can I start the requested page?
JackRendar (talk) 20:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ???

message: Each release of the game should have its own subsection, briefly describing how it differs from the others, and what machines it runs on. 2fort5r (talk) 17:44, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Compfusing

message: This page could benefit from having a complete list of games with release dates and platforms  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.28.83.180 (talk) 12:30, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  full list of monopoly games 

message: As far as I recall (I have been playing it myself for quite a while), the wording like “For several months in 2009, Google Maps hosted an online version of Monopoly, using its maps as the board” is quite incorrect: it hasn’t been “hosted by Google Maps” (implying it was produced/implemented by Google), but basically launched by Hasbro (or some of its production teams), and just used the Google Maps (and OpenStreetMaps altogether) through the public official APIs (as everybody can do, and make their own clone or similar game).
Google Maps were used to provide the “gaming board”, draw the city of the game; on top of the city, the lines and the roads were superimposed according to the information taken from the OSM (street geometry, street length – the latter was rather important as depending on the length, the number of possible properties on this street varied). As the visuals were taken from one and the street structure taken from another service, it sometimes caused minor (and sometimes more major) inconsistencies as the could be slightly mismatched.
But as a summary, my understanding is it was made by (Hasbro-related) third party.
Honeyman (talk) 11:52, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monopoly: City Streets 

message: Can Monopoly Go be included? MarioX974 (talk) 21:07, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Popular mobile game
Talk:MRC: Multi-Racing Championship

message: This is definitely a solid Start-Class. What is there is brilliant: clear prose, great referencing, fair use rationales, etc. I noted that you said you're done with the article, but if you ever want to come back to it then you need only expand the article in the normal way (Development, Technology, Story(?), Lead section, Screenshots etc) continue with this level of consistency. As it is, this article gets a solid thumbs-up. Una LagunaTalk 18:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! --Mika1h (talk) 18:47, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Namco Museum 64

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement.  Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. --VernoWhitney (talk) 14:14, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 15:54, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Eli P. Ashmun

message: He is listed in Who Was Who in America as being born in Blandford, Massachusetts, which is nowhere near Albany, New York.  Any ideas on how to deal with the discrepancy?  Badbilltucker 16:48, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Many 19th-century biographic sketches claim (apparently incorrectly) that he was born in Blandford.  According to longer sketches (such as this one) he was born near Fort Edward in 1770, the family fleeing to Blandford in 1777. Magic♪piano 14:27, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born Where?
Talk:NBA Hangtime

message: I think the gameplay section drags on far too long. Can we substantially reduce it? Most of this stuff is obvious or applies to all basketball video games, especially this section:
Different players have different skills that reflect their real-life counterparts. Players can be substituted at halftime. Field goals, three pointers, dunks, rebounds, assists, steals, blocked shots and turnovers as well as player injuries are counted in halftime and end of game stats, as well as a quarter-by-quarter summary of points scored for each team.
Also, this is one of my favorite games of all time, but I don't remember anything about "zeating up." Can we source this or delete?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.182.172.229 (talk) 14:22, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overkill 

message: The content from NBA Maximum Hangtime should be merged into this article. Apart from the roster update, there's little that can be said about that game apart from NBA Hangtime. --Jtalledo (talk) 00:57, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from ''[[NBA Maximum Hangtime]]'' 

message: When was the Windows version released? 2fort5r (talk) 19:39, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 1996 according to Moby. Anyone have a better source for this? 2fort5r (talk) 21:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

text: Gamespot says December 31, 1996: http://www.gamespot.com/pc/sports/nbahangtime/review.html --Jtalledo (talk) 00:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Windows
Talk:Scott Peters

message: The text of this article is from a City of San Diego Web site.  Their disclaimer expressly forbids the use of their text anywhere else.  See WP:CP for the two possible ways to release permissions.  Until then, I am deleting this article and restoring it to a version that was about an Australian cricketer, which is the only legitimate use I can find.  There are several "Scott Peters" linked around Wikipedia, and they are all different people, so we will need a disambig page if any more Scott Peters articles are forthcoming. --Aguerriero (talk) 21:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Strike that, someone already created Scott Peters (cricket) so I made this a disambig. --Aguerriero (talk) 23:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio deleted
Talk:NHL Breakaway 98

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.answers.com/topic/nhl-breakaway-98. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 22:39, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Off Road Challenge

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.answers.com/topic/off-road-challenge. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 21:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed