lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Bannon

message: I don't particularly like it either, not all that fitting of a Premier. That said, when we have to deal with the likes of people such as Damiens.rf, we don't have much choice. Timeshift (talk) 08:30, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean we don't much choice? What's to stop us from still using :Image:John bannon.jpg? (This is an honest question, not a rhetorical one). Peter Ballard (talk) 08:50, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Damiens.rf is a........ Timeshift (talk) 08:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And how does that stop us reverting his edits? Peter Ballard (talk) 08:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Had a stroll through the SA Premier and PM pages lately? Timeshift (talk) 08:56, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Then we'll whack them all on our watchlists and do our bit to end the madness.--Yeti Hunter (talk) 12:03, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good luck, I wish you well! Timeshift (talk) 15:15, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

text: I have solved this problem by uploading an cropped version of your image here :Image:John Bannon.jpg which should suffice until a more appropriate image can be found. Hope this is to your liking, Damien. Also, care to remove this highly inappropriate image from the Table service, Waiting staff and Tray pages? Please, lets have some respect for living people here and portray them in the light befitting their positions and achievements. ABVS1936 (talk) 17:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

text: What's so unrespectful? Do you think politicians are more noble than other professions? --Damiens.rf 17:55, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I mean that taking the image of a politician out of context and placing it on pages that have no relation to the subject is disrespectful. Please have some respect for a man who was the longest serving Premier of South Australia, among other things, and don't misuse an image of him clearly taken out of context. ABVS1936 (talk) 18:46, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically Bannon wasn't actually the longest serving Premier, he's second. First is Playford/Playmander. Timeshift (talk) 01:34, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, my bad - shows that I should check what I have written more carfully before clicking "Save page"! Was supposed to read one of the longest serving Premiers - thanks for the pick up. Back on topic, it does seem like we have come to a consensus regarding the way in which these images are being used. ABVS1936 (talk) 03:41, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:John Barclay (cricketer)

message: "As a bowler, he dominated and destroyed opposition with his off-spin." Barclay? I think that's rather over egged and POV! WillE 18:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I like Barclay, but I'm afraid that several other statements in the article also fall into the "over egged and POV" category. JH (talk page) 17:33, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:John Baring, 7th Baron Ashburton

message: Baron Ashburton is a Churchill cousin by marriage, so I added the category. V. Joe (talk) 22:38, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spencer-Churchill

message: It's all family-tree, nothing on his education or career. Valetude (talk) 00:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career?
Talk:John Barker (Australian footballer)

message: It's a matter of public record that the Fitzroy Football Club is still around in its own right, albeit not in the AFL - now in the VAFA - and is not a part of the Brisbane Lions. Hence any claim that Fitzroy no longer competes as a club and somehow merged with Brisbane is not true and shouldn't be posted as such in Wikipedia articles like this one.
What is true is that Brisbane took over the AFL operations. As detailed by Fitzroy on the club's website (http://www.fitzroyfc.com.au), and within Wikipedia itself for a long time now in the entry about Fitzroy (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fitzroy_Football_Club). And both the club website and that Wikipedia entry clearly show that Fitzroy still exist and compete as a club on the field.
To reiterate, since Fitzroy still exists as a club, both on and off the field, and since the club clearly states that it was the AFL operations absorbed into Brisbane, not the club itself, it's self-evident that there was no merger.
121.210.232.42 (talk) 14:12, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual error corrected about Fitzroy in this article 
Talk:John Barnwell

message: This article has been changed incorrectly.  He was born in Newcastle upon Tyne and did play as an amateur for Bishop Auckland before moving to Arsenal.  Date of birth is correct.  He also played for Whitley Bay before Bishop Auckland.  He played for England Youth as well as getting an England Under 23 cap.  Some of this can be viewed on the LMA site which is linked from the page.  He is a relative of mine.  There is no connection with Dublin, for well over 100 years.
77.96.244.123 (talk) 22:04, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Baron (politician)

message: John Baron has refused to fully explain his conduct in the Expenses scandal of 2009/2010. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.138.45 (talk • contribs) 09:05, 1 May 2010
He is a genocidal war criminal. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:2071:A720:AACF:EC22 (talk) 15:36, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expenses Scandal. 
Talk:John Barry Nusum

message: This article, and person whom it talks about, sounds just like John Nusum. Are they the same person?? Or is one the son and the other the father?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NaturalAbundance (talk • contribs) 04:34, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar article?? 
Talk:John Bayley (writer)

message: John Bayley's memoirs about his life with Iris Murdoch, especially after she was afflicted with Alzheimers, portray himself as a faithful, endlessly nurturing and patient partner. He wrote that because of her condition they lived in squalor, and that because of her demented behavior he rarely had a peaceful moment. The English writer A.N. Wilson, who was a long-time friend of both of them, strongly disputes Bayley's account in his book Iris Murdoch As I Knew Her.  He points out that they were comfortably wealthy (Murdoch left an estate of two million pounds), and could easily have hired nurses, aides and housekeepers. They could have lived in clean, safe and pleasant surroundings. He considered it abusive to Murdoch that Bayley rejected any other care for her, than he could provide himself. Wilson also believes that Bayley made a cottage industry for himself with his memoirs about Iris's pitifully diminished condition.  He believes that Bayley failed to honor his wife's whole life, her radiant intelligence and numerous friendships and accomplishments. Wilson believes that Bayley concentrated on the few years of Murdoch's mental decay out of long-submerged jealousy and envy.
Younggoldchip (talk) 13:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy Regarding Bayley's Interpretation of Events
Talk:John Bean (politician)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 05:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 December 2020
Talk:John Beasley (actor)

message: The article previously said, "Beasley was a cast member in Terms of Endearment, where he played the Doctor." No source was given for this claim and the credit does not appear in John Beasley's IMDb listing. Therefore, I removed it. 71.162.135.20 (talk) 02:11, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Terms of Endearment' claim
Talk:John Bellamy Foster

message: If he is the editor of a magazine that publishes his books, that might that count as vanity publishing?
99.207.10.246 (talk) 15:55, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we get more that one reference that is not self-published? 
Talk:John Bitove Sr.

message: John Bitove provided significant financial resources to the United Macedonian Diaspora, and has spent "millions of dollars" for the promotion of the Republic of Macedonia's interests.[11]
I looked through the source and I was not able to find where it says that John Bitove has donated millions. Maybe I am being clumsy but can someone point me to where it says this.
* I have posted a notice on the talkpage of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Local_hero on the 18th of June 2020 for him to get involved in this discussion, waiting for him to reply within 7 days.
:I can't find that wording in the source either, I've fixed it. --Local hero talk 17:17, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a lot --James Richards (talk) 17:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  R.E John Bitove's Donation to UMD
Talk:John Blake (English journalist)

message: It should be noted that John's wife Diane is not the same person as Diana Colbert and has never worked in PR. In fact, Diane is a former nurse. 
Pete 21:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Blake's wife 

message: Remember Simon Mann in the Equatorial Guinea scandal, with strong suggestions about Mark Thatcher's involvement? No mention of his memoir, Cry Havoc, published by Blake in 2011? Valetude (talk) 00:34, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simon Mann?
Talk:John Blashford-Snell

message: I don't think we can really say that his notability has been established until the article is a bit fleshed out. I'll start working on that in a bit but until then we should keep the tag on the page. BrendanFrye (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a bit more. I think there is enough there now, so I removed the tag. If you want more added, let me know and I'll look up some more stuff. At the moment, I need to find out why the SES link is blacklisted. Carcharoth (talk) 23:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it's much better now. BrendanFrye (talk) 00:21, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notabilty
Talk:John Boardman (art historian)

message: It should be noted for everyone that all Archaeologists are really closet art historians... they are not classicists or archaeologists or anthropologists or what have you, but should be pidgeonholed simply as "art historians", regardless of their work...  Stevenmitchell (talk) 04:24, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, just when art history is mostly what they do - if only more archaeologists were like him!  Johnbod (talk) 13:22, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  All Archaeologists are Secretly Art Historians 
Talk:John Bohlinger

message: The previous version was virtually identical to the Bohlinger bio at http://governor.mt.gov/ltgov/ltgovbio.asp which also included some information not necessary for an encyclopedic biography.
Allenthompson (talk) 05:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewritten 12/30/2007 
Talk:John Bond (banker)

message: I am not familiar with the subject, but Sir John Bond himself has said on the ICorrect website that the following information is wrong in the wikipedia article, quoting: "I wish to correct my entry in Wikipedia. I was born on 24 July 1941. I am not The Honourable. I joined The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation at the age of 19, not 21. I have not worked in the Middle East. I was posted to New York, not Buffalo. I spent one year in the USA as an English-Speaking Union scholarship student at Cate School, near Santa Barbara, California, not two years." (source:http://www.icorrect.com/browse_corrections#68) --MoRsE (talk) 14:14, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It cost him £600 to post that, when he could have edited here for free. Gareth E Kegg (talk) 01:36, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections
Talk:John Bond (footballer)

message: I've changed this to the 25th September based on an obit in The Independent. However I have just read this  which says the 26th. I do not know which is accurate.--Egghead06 (talk) 07:25, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death
Talk:John Boorman

message: Well under the terms and guidelines of Wiki, I must be polite and respectful, so I will try to be.  
I am a huge fan of spiritual/religous horror movies. Of course everyone can agree that The Exorcist (the original) is one of the best 100 movies of all time.  After watching it I was compelled to watch the other movies in the series. When watching sequals to great horror movies, you can never expect them to be as great as the first. But after watching 'Exorcist 2', I have never been so dissapointed in my life.
The story line did try to relate to the previous movie, but it really used too many special effects and science jargin to grab the watcher. I will continue this later, but please be assured that this is by far, one of the worst movies I have ever seen in my life and really made me dissapointed in the whole series.  It is to be said that out of the 4 Exorcist movies, the 2nd one was the worst by far!
Kyle Little  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.43.8.1 (talk) 20:50, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exorcist 2 Not the Best Movie 

message: Most authorities put Shepperton as John Boorman's Birthplace. In his autobiography Adventures of a Suburban Boy he states that he was born in 50 Rosehill Avenue Carshalton Surrey, where he did indeed reside in his early life. A much distorted Rosehill Avenue is depicted in his film Hope and Glory.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.11.55 (talk) 20:45, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Boorman 

message: * That's all, folks, article by Boorman in The Guardian arguing that the current Hollywood studio system promotes mediocrity and is unsustainable
* Zardoz: Out of the Vortex Infos, timeline, special files, pics and much more about 'Zardoz' (1973)
* Boorman's plans for The Lord of the Rings
* Boorman's attempted trip to Middle-earth
* More info on Boorman's LOTR, from the theonering.com message board
* John Boorman at the Grand Action A documentary about John Boorman who came in Paris (France), in 2006, to present Point Blank with the French critic Michel Ciment.
* John Boorman Interview of John Boorman for Boulevard du Classic
Moved from the article per WP:NOTLINK, but could be of some use for references. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 17:42, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Why is there no mention of the fact he is Jewish? (2A00:23C4:638A:5000:2DA4:EA01:39A9:D0A1 (talk) 19:38, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Why should there be.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.247.9 (talk) 18:06, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish
Talk:Han Shizhong

message: Though this shouldn't be the place to explain this term, it is comprised of 莫須 有, 莫須 being a Song vernacular (no longer used now) term for the interrogative form of "There probably should be". In other words, what Qin Hui is saying is closer to "he isn't guilty?" Though it would be a non-sequiteur answer to Han's "Under what charges" so I've used a similar expression "Isn't there evidence?" This also highlights the logical fallacy. AKFrost (talk) 10:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 莫須有
Talk:Center for Reproductive and Sexual Health

message: Excuse me, but I provided extensive citations about how CRASH was closed down. Severa, you are not the only person permitted to post about abortion. It's one thing to truncate or edit, but you've developed a nasty habit of simply deleting, without any discussion whatsoever. ChristinaDunigan 13:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it was Andrew c who reverted you the second time here. -Severa  (!!!) 21:56, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The header reads "This article does not cite any references or sources. (August 2006)
Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed." But the sources are cited:
^ a b Aborting America, Bernard Nathanson, Pinnacle Books, 1981
^ a b c d New York Health Department Order No. 83383136, Case No. 11097
^ New York Daily News, September 17, 1994
^ New York Newsday, September 17, 1994
That's two news articles, a health department order, and a book. That's a lot of cites for an article that consists of five short paragraphs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.145.5.68 (talk) 11:54, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the "not cites" header?
Talk:John Brockington

message: I added a new section about his foundation. It could use some more sources though, if anyone has a mind to do that.Beefcake6412 (talk) 22:31, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: New Section
Talk:Lawyer Milloy

message: Is this a biography or a summary of the 2003 season? Squadoosh 09:16, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking the same thing, this article needs massive amounts of work. In addition to spending 90% of the article on 1 out of his 11 years in the league it's also told in a very unencyclopediac style, like it was posted on a fanboard form a fan's perspective. It does have a lot of good raw data in there though. It just needs to be refined. Quadzilla99 08:15, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been re-written now. Quadzilla99 02:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  biography 
Talk:John Brown (footballer, born 1962)

message: Did he play for Swindon Town F.C.? There's a link to John Brown on there that should point here if so.  Diverman 12:02, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Did he not get any caps?RicoRichmond (talk) 19:24, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internationals 

message: Why is there no mention of Bomber's numerous drink driving and speeding convictions? The latest resulting in a ban.
http://www.thecourier.co.uk/news/scotland/driving-ban-for-dundee-boss-john-brown-1.105927  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.0.233.75 (talk) 23:02, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drink driving convictions
Talk:Sir John Riddell, 13th Baronet

message: Of which IBA  was Sir John the deputy chairman from 1981-85?  Fayenatic (talk) 13:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: – It was the Independent Broadcasting Authority. I [ edited] the article, adding a reference to confirm this. – Wdchk (talk) 01:24, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation: IBA 

message: Family info is given here Peerage News although it does not appear to be a WP:RS. - Fayenatic (talk) 16:13, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Family
Talk:John Buck (baseball)

message: John Buck signed with the Florida Marlins on November 17th, 2010
66.99.140.178 (talk) 16:53, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. -Atmoz (talk) 20:14, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 66.99.140.178, 17 November 2010
Talk:John Burridge

message: Lead says 771, infobox says 768......? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:01, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apps total 
Talk:John Button (Australian politician)

message: I removed the 2nd sentence of the article (see older version of article here), which said:
"He was notable as a lively, good-humoured, honest and generally popular politician, and has been accoladed as "the best PM Australia never had"."
It seemed to be too gushing with praise, and the PM line was also confusing. However, the Alan Ramsey article in the citation may have some useful facts to be re-used elsewhere. Thanks, Lester 04:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the article could use some more feeling.  It would be nice if it could get worked iback in somehow.  Maybe line is too gushing.  Probably too gushing for the lead.  However, I'm sure I've heard it said before, back in the 1990s. See http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/07/09/1026185041126.html for example.  Maybe it was only Ramsey who ever said it, repeatedly?  I also remember an interview in which Button discussed the notion that he might have been a PM.  Strangely, I was well aware of John Button, but not of the The Button Car Plan.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed line about "Best PM we ever had" 

message: Someone keeps on insisting he died today, 8 April.  Where is the evidence for that date, or, indeed, any other date?  --  JackofOz (talk) 06:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed.  The Ramsey obituary editorial linked above is dated April 5th, despite being published April 8th.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The best I've seen anywhere is "overnight", which could mean either 7th or 8th April.  Perhaps he died in his sleep, his actual moment of death was not witnessed, and he was found dead this morning.  If that's the case, only his death certificate will be able to say on which date he actually died, based on a medical estimate.  --  JackofOz (talk) 10:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Maybe he died from heart problems on the 7th or 8th but im pretty sure he died on the 8th. The obituary might have been a typo in some cases or he might of posted his death before he died Maybe. We will have to wait for his death certificate to find out the exact date of death.--Pookeo9 (talk) 19:41, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What leads you to believe ("im pretty sure") he died on the 8th rather than the 7th, Pooke09?  Is there anything online that's more definite than "overnight"?  --  JackofOz (talk) 22:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We have a date now.  His death notice in The Age, from his partner and family, said he died on the 8th.  --  JackofOz (talk) 04:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death
Talk:John Byner

message: Byner was on an episode of Judge Judy, wasn't he?  He was hired as an entertainer for a party, but was taken to court by the family who hired him (I'm not certain of the specifics). --M.Neko 06:08, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the article, Byner was married to his first wife from 1960 to 1989. Fair enough. But it also says he was married to his second wife from 1982 to 1983 and his third wife from 1985 until some unknown date. Either some of these dates are incorrect or there are some details of Byner's personal life that should be addressed in the main article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.66.225.123 (talk) 03:26, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage dates
Talk:John C. Whitcomb

message: My recent change to the biography regarding "accredited schools" relates specifically to the Institute for Creation Research (yes, it is an accredited graduate school) and to other institutions such as Biola University (whose staff is composed of scientists from various points on the creationism-naturalism spectrum.--eleuthero 21:21, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The issue is science. Accreditation means nothing, especially when reading that the founder of Institute for Creation Research was on the board of directors of its accreditator. ErRe 03:46, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

text: There is no spectrum in that regard. Either you accept naturalism as a logical limit to scientific inquiry, or you don't. - RoyBoy 800 19:14, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: accredited schools

message: There was a section (titled "Criticism") which was a review of Whitcomb and Henry C. Morris' book titled "The Genesis Flood". Seeing as it was a book review, I moved the content to The_Genesis_Flood:_The_Biblical_Record_and_Its_Scientific_Implications#Reception.
Kdulcimer (talk) 14:32, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that this removes the only third-party coverage that was in this article. Further, the source in question, AiG is clearly a questionable source, so its use as the sole source violates WP:ABOUTSELF. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 14:41, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you believe this issue is now resolved? I see that there are 6 sources cited now. As far as AiG is concerned, the only claim cited to them is if John C. Whitcomb works for AiG or not. AiG says he does, and I see no cause to call them an unreliable source on who their own employees are. Kdulcimer (talk) 16:15, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Book Review