Talk:Las Palmas

message: Las Palmas: is ONE to Santa Cruz de Tenerife with whom it shares the status of capital city.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.152.174.198 (talk) 09:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santa Cruz de Tenerife tambien capital 

message: Spanish version: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81rea_metropolitana_de_Las_Palmas_de_Gran_Canaria  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.32.232.30 (talk) 12:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, is not. Your source said nothing about it, second sources  says something else: Las Palmas - 884km², Santa Cruz - 739km². Inter-man (talk) 14:07, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

text: No, is not. Your source said nothing about it, second sources  says something else: Las Palmas - 884km², Santa Cruz - 739km². Inter-man (talk) 14:12, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

text: No, wrong, watch it on the page in Spanish.
Santa Cruz: 366,85 km²: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81rea_metropolitana_de_Santa_Cruz_de_Tenerife-La_Laguna
Las Palmas: 284.5 km²: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%81rea_metropolitana_de_Las_Palmas_de_Gran_Canaria  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.148.88.210 (talk) 18:14, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not sources. Local patriotism? Inter-man (talk) 20:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area 

message: The Parliament of the Canary Islands Santa Cruz is not in Las Palmas: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parlamento_de_Canarias
And removed it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.148.88.210 (talk) 18:40, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Parliament of the Canary Islands Santa Cruz is not in Las Palmas 

message: Las Palmas was considered the capital of the Canary Islands, but without any real legal and thus was considered but never was capital for the whole of the right word, because it was only capital of the Canaries, La Laguna in Tenerife (and Yet this was for three centuries, while Las Palmas by two). But Santa Cruz de Tenerife it was with all the honors and legal and real capital of the sole and sovereign Archipelago Canario up in 1927 years with the shared Las Palmas. Greetings.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.154.235.217 (talk) 15:26, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Officially, Las Palmas is the capital. Inter-man (talk) 17:25, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

text: If you consider Santa Cruz and La LAguna jointly, then in Gran Canaria you must consider Las Palmas, Telde and Arucas also jointly, and these three almost double the population of Santa Cruz+La Laguna. --109.151.162.180 (talk) 23:14, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Las Palmas has never been the capital of the Canary Islands only 

message: In this paper we are putting things that do not correspond to this city, as Arucas Cathedral in the city this Arucas not in this, the Basilica of this in Telde Telde and the Basilica of Our Lady of pine that is in Teror not in Las Palmas. I'll corrected.--BeneharoMencey (talk) 11:45, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  ERROR 

message: there's a STATUE of her, what more "verifiable source" do you need?
http://www.google.co.uk/images?hl=en&safe=off&gbv=2&tbs=isch%3A1&sa=1&q=%22lolita+pluma%22+statue&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.28.190.67 (talk) 13:23, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lolita Pluma deleted from section "Notable natives and residents" 

message: I am unable to copyedit this section because I find it too confusing - the section lacks sources and lacks clarity, and the paragraph on the GC-2 needs the attention of a 'local'. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 04:58, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roads section 

message: Las Palmas has never been the capital of Canary I think that it is necessary to erase this part, one is confusing many people with this information, many graces.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tenerifecanarias (talk • contribs) 21:08, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You wrong. Subtropical-man (talk) 21:35, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

text: Sorry. Exist sources for previous version, Las Palmas was only capital. Subtropical-man (talk) 20:17, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

text: You are sock-puppet of User:Tenerifecanarias, so do not repeat yourself. Subtropical-man (talk) 17:44, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

text: "It has been the most important city" is not an objective fact (especially when it was not even the capital for many years) but a subjective opinion. Wikipedia users must maintain a neutral point of view. James343e (talk) 23:19, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Las Palmas has never been the capital of the Canary Islands only

message: Clásicos Canarios de Automóviles (in Las Palmas) was a Spanish manufacturer of automobiles. Please translate from :de:Clásicos Canarios de Automóviles. Subtropical-man (talk) 16:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Clásicos Canarios de Automóviles

message: I really think that this page should be name "Las Palmas de Gran Canaria". Even though the city is called "Las Palmas", it is not it real name. Just because New York is called "Big Apple", we should change it wikipedia page. --Oflo84 (talk) 23:22, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In the world, common name is Las Palmas. Comparison to the "Big Apple" is very funny. Subtropical-man (talk) 20:34, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official name 

message: Other sights on the suburbs: Needless, nothing set forth in this section is in the city of Las Palmas and in this article are talking about the city not the adjacent communes.--83.40.238.142 (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other sights on the suburbs 

message: After reading this article, it states "Las Palmas enjoys "the best climate in the world according to a study carried out by Thomas Whitmore". I think it is not necessary to indicate that Las Palmas has the best climate in the world. This has nothing to do with putting the city down or any other but we cannot tell which city has a good climate and which city has a bad climate, that is up to an individual and it should be written from a neutral point of view. It sounds biased because it is based on one person and the references used are all low quality (all of them are about tourism, so it sounds promotional) with none of them showing the original study. What defines the best climate in the world varies from person to person. I think this line should be removed. Ssbbplayer (talk) 07:26, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best Climate in the World? 

message: ... when WP:ON and WP:WIAN are overruled by WP:COMMONNAME and WP:PRIMARYTOPIC without a single explanation, and when logic is defied with statements like "What is official or accurate is utterly irrelevant". No sources to support the original move decision, no reasoning given to oppose the reversal request. A lawyer's nightmare, and a blunder of encycolpaedic proportions. 2620:0:1050:9:B12A:99B6:5921:8C9F (talk) 17:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  You know something is wrong... 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Las Palmas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100629205852/http://www.laspalmasgc.es/lpgc/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=137 to http://www.laspalmasgc.es/lpgc/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=137
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:30, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Las Palmas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080626021959/http://www.urbanaudit.org/CityProfiles.aspx?CityCode=ES008C&CountryCode=ES to http://www.urbanaudit.org/CityProfiles.aspx?CityCode=ES008C&CountryCode=ES
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720145630/http://alarcos.inf-cr.uclm.es/per/fruiz/pobesp/dat/arc/conurbaciones.xls to http://alarcos.inf-cr.uclm.es/per/fruiz/pobesp/dat/arc/conurbaciones.xls
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://world-gazetteer.com/wg.php?x=&men=gcis&lng=en&des=wg&geo=-4&srt=pnan&col=abcdefghinoq&msz=1500&pt=a&va=&srt=dpnan
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121118081428/http://www.aemet.es/en/conocermas/publicaciones/detalles/guia_resumida_2010 to http://www.aemet.es/en/conocermas/publicaciones/detalles/guia_resumida_2010
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160820145025/http://www.lfgrancanaria.com/index.php/fr/nous-contacter to http://www.lfgrancanaria.com/index.php/fr/nous-contacter
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/clarinet/jeurope.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://mdc.ulpgc.es/utils/getfile/collection/aea/id/2212/filename/2213.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/clarinet/heurope.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Las Palmas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924002318/http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/StudiesScientificSupportProjects/UrbanFunctions/fr-1.4.3_April2007-final.pdf to http://www.espon.eu/export/sites/default/Documents/Projects/ESPON2006Projects/StudiesScientificSupportProjects/UrbanFunctions/fr-1.4.3_April2007-final.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/clarinet/jeurope.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://mdc.ulpgc.es/utils/getfile/collection/aea/id/2212/filename/2213.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shotou/clarinet/heurope.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090922110143/http://64.78.18.131/live/lpalmas07/home.asp to http://64.78.18.131/live/lpalmas07/home.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110301173902/http://www.realclubdegolfdelaspalmas.com/2008/elclub_historia.php to http://www.realclubdegolfdelaspalmas.com/2008/elclub_historia.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:16, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Las Palmas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031204041315/http://www.promocionlaspalmas.com/sanjuan/ to http://www.promocionlaspalmas.com/sanjuan/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711122633/http://portal.grancanaria.com/portal/ficha-descriptivo.px?codcontenido=673&municipio=Santa%20Br%C3%ADgida to http://portal.grancanaria.com/portal/ficha-descriptivo.px?codcontenido=673&municipio=Santa%20Br%C3%ADgida
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This has been going for years but apparently hasn't been fixed???? official name of the city is LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA. it is true that it is commonly referred to as LAS PALMAS, but this doesn't make it real or official. The name of this article is wrong, please modify asap.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zogas (talk • contribs) 09:18, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: . The name of the article is compatible with :Wikipedia:Common name. You wrote: "official name is not correct", the name of the article does not always have to be in accordance with the formal/official name. Also, for this name there is consensus, per :Wikipedia:Consensus. Subtropical-man (✉ | en-2) 12:41, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  OFFICIAL NAME IS NOT CORRECT