lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:35th Division (United Kingdom)

message: I spent some time making a map based on the larger 1916 Somme battle map. The background grouping and layering is a bit off due to the different versions of the SVG editor, and I'm only a 'shallow' user. If anyone can tart it up I'd appreciate it.Usedtoknowthat (talk) 18:24, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Somme 1918 map
Talk:Wykagyl Country Club

message: This article has already been deleted multiple times, because of someone's attempt to use it as apparent advertising.  I was able to get the article re-created, after rewriting it from scratch, and getting approval from multiple admins.  Please, do not add anything new to the article, unless you have an actual published source that shows where the information is coming from.  If the article is just turned into an ad again, it may just get deleted again. --Elonka 00:09, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing
Talk:Trisomy

message: I've taken a stab at making this more readable, and deleting the table from a dated article on survival rates.  There's a lot more that needs to be done, including deleting repetition in section on human trisomies.  --75.34.28.215 (talk) 01:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs work

message: Would you define klinefelter syndrome as a trisomy? I haven't found any articles to prove the existence of the term "trisomy of sex chromosomes".
X and Y chromosomes are not identical, they're different chromosomes which belong in a group of "sex chromosomes".
Hence I think we cannot use the term "trisomy of sex chromosomes". Better term: Sex chromosome abnormalities.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sav vas (talk • contribs) 14:44, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trisomy of *sex* chromosomes?
File talk:Reachability graph for petri net.png

message: Why not display the nodes as cartesian coords?
(0,0) (1,0) (2,0)
(0,1)
(0,2)   ...etc
Placing the transition arcs would be trivial.
Besides, the current png lacks a T3 from (1,1) to (1,0)...81.35.196.73 (talk) 00:17, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Mòruisg

message: There should not be an accent on the O, the Ordnance Survey and every guide book on the Scottish Munros writes the hill name without an accent, so why make the change. Wheres the evidence that there should be an accent.Mick Knapton (talk) 09:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The evidence is in every single Scottish Gaelic dictionary - why don't you buy one? It doesn't make any sense as a name without one, in fact, when one misses the accents from Gaelic words it alters both their pronounciation and meaning e.g. "Mòr" means large, and "Mor" is a girl's name (usually lengthened to "Morag"). Having seen the guidebook "pronounciation" for Càrn Aosda, it is clear that some of these writers are pretty ignorant on this subject. The OS is currently trying to remedy some of its past misdemeanours - these include putting accents back on, going back to the proper spelling, or even providing a bilingual version of a name. --MacRusgail (talk) 11:31, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accents
Talk:Ghillies (dance shoes)

message: Most Irish and British manufacturers refer to Irish ghillies as pumps/pomps or soft shoes, not ghillies; shouldn't there be some mention of this? Shadowcrow (talk) 00:21, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I just occasionally found some 1950s shoes designed in ghillies style from this blog post, shouldn't there be some information for this if there are strong proofs for such fashion trend as this? -- Great Brightstar (talk) 04:28, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghillies went fashion?
Talk:FC Poltava

message: Am Benjamin Essien from Ghana and will like to play for you club cos my dream is to play in Ukraine as a professional player. Am an attacker[7,11] I play both legs and so I'm good in playing on the wings. my email benesien06@yahoo.com and my phone number is +233272630864. 
thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.218.244.93 (talk) 22:31, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  hello 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Iranian oil bourse

message: This webpage should absolutely not be deleted. It pertains to an area of knowledge and study... well worth knowing about for that matter. There is no reason at all to conceal, hide, or destroy (remove and forget) information on this topic or any topic. Specifically, I am concerned that anyone would want to remove info on this entry and am suspicious of motives to do so. To omit pertinent knowledge is to skew the story; and the story of the Iranian Oil Bourse and it's attempted creation may well become a centerpiece in this segment of our worlds history. Let us continue to check the facts, learn from what is going on, and build up a knowledge base, correcting errors as we progress. Let us not simply "throw away" topics of knowledge.165.91.13.153 (talk) 00:26, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Etton, Cambridgeshire

message: I wonder if any users have some in-depth knowledge of the archaeology around Etton and Pryor's discoveries? Whilst it seems to be a site of some importance, I can't find anything about the mysterious "mirror image" ritual village, despite the fact that such a feature would be very unusual (perhaps even unique) and would thus surely be covered in archaeology literature online. Anyone...? 82.4.208.40 (talk) 17:48, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:BigBelly

message: To me it seems like a really bad idea to have a very long list of city names in the very first part of the article. It's also no longer a good idea to talk about the operation of one of the companies products under the heading "Operation" when this is no longer the only product they make. The heading makes it sound like it's about the operation of the company, but the text is about the operation of what used to be their only product but now is just one of their products.
I tried to clean up this by moving the list of installations and the "operation" section to a new section about that one product, the bin. But this change got reverted with no explanation. I don't understand how it is better to have the article like it is now. If someone could explain what I did wrong I'd appreciate it. I want to help Wikipedia become better, but when things like this happens I just get upset and I'm less likely to try and do something the next time I see some potential for improvement. Please make sure to always give an explanation when someone in good faith tries to help.
Forteller (talk) 14:26, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Peakirk

message: Prudent to mention that not many secondary school student from peakirk go to arthur mellows.
Most go to king's
seems a bit naff to mention arthur mellows at all really. It has no real association with peakirk really.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.159.77.42 (talk) 22:31, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Sustainable food system

message: This stub appears to only consist of a definition at the moment. Are there plans to expand this article? Or should it possibly be moved to Wiktionary. - Atmoz (talk) 05:16, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am the creator of this article, and I no longer have any plans to expand it. I agree that it should be moved to Wiktionary. --Phenylalanine (talk) 01:41, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not the kind of phrase you'd find in a dictionary. I would proposed moving it to food system, which doesn't yet exist, but probably should, moving the sustainability def. to it's own section, and marking it as a stub. --naught101 (talk) 01:14, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dictionary definition?
Talk:Colombia–Israel relations

message: Once again, Wikipedia stands guilty of gross inaccuracy and misrepresentation of the facts. UN General Assembly Resolution did not nor did it have any authority to "create" any state. As is stated quite clearly in resolution itself, it merely "recommended" partition of Mandate Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state.
Israel did not become an independent country due to that resolution, because that resolution was rejected by the Palestinian "Arab Higher Commitee" and the Arab League by force of arms, was declared "unworkable" by the British Mandate authorities, and hence never carried over to the UN Security Council for implementation. Israel estalished itself, against all odds, and did not become a UN member until it had survived the devastating war of '48-'49 (no thanks to the UN).
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.68.95.65 (talk) 19:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Resolution 181 created Israel" is an incorrect statement 
Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion/User:BQZip01/Comments

message: Absolutely not appropriate. Lawrence § t/e 00:42, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your opinion doesn't justify a revert, IMHO: 1 2 — BQZip01 — talk 04:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voting tallies removed 

message: This is all I am going to say more about this MfD, this is insane and it is well in line with WP:USER. Those advocating its removal simply don't understand this application of a Wikipedia guideline and I'm glad it was kept.
For those advocating against my next RfA, please realize that it is not an admin's job to prevent conflict (conflict will happen), but to facilitate a reasonable discussion. 
:If you consider following the rules to a T "disruption, then perhaps you should rethink your position. 
:If you think a discussion is tantamount to disruption, perhaps you should rethink your position. Yes, I could have removed it and worked offline, but I didn't need to IAW the rules. I didn't advertise the page. I didn't do anything with the information other than work on it. I didn't invite anyone to see it. I didn't do anything else other than prepare for an RfC. This whole thing could have been in an RfC right now if I had just been allowed to work in peace on the draft. This was as much an "attack page" as possessing a firearm is assault. I consider this AN/I & MfD to have been the primary disruption here. 
This was my line in the sand and I see it as vindication of my actions by the Wikipedia community (save for a few)
Feel free to comment at will here, but I will not respond to any posts on this page. Have a nice day. Gig 'em and God Bless. — BQZip01 — talk 05:40, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Your claim that this MFD delayed your making an RFC is completely laughable.  You were the only one that could have ended this MFD any time you wanted by just moving the page offline.  Your choices were 1.) Keep the peace, work offline, get your RFC done quickly, 2.) Continue the madhouse at WP:ANI and here, work in userspace, delay your RFC who knows how long.  An admin chooses #1, you chose #2.  —Wknight94 (talk) 05:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Unbelievable.  I was going to respond to this drama-inducing little "final shot," perhaps by noting that being barely tolerated (for 4 days, not the demanded 45) by a community that's nonetheless sick of your behavior is not a vindication of anything -- or by refuting the idea that an admin should create (rather than resolve) drama, as BQZ seems to believe.  But I've had enough drama.  So, uh, good luck with that RFA, man - given your behavior here, you're gonna need it. --TheOtherBob 17:10, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conclusion

message: TomPhan was a sockpuppet of a user I had a hand in blocking at WP:SSP Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/TomPhan — BQZip01 — talk 15:47, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: FYI

message: Public note here letting admins know the page must go to DR by Wednesday or can be deleted. Lawrence § t/e 15:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on ANI
Talk:Burghley House

message: I see from their website that they think they are in Lincolnshire, not Cambridgeshire! Johnbod (talk) 18:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No they don't; they merely give their address which includes Stamford, Lincolnshire, as the post town. Nedrutland (talk) 18:56, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where?
Talk:Longthorpe Tower

message: I'm intending to expand the article, but before doing so wanted to propose a change in citation style, to use the harvnb format for the short cites, and cite book for the bibliography. Under this system, "Pettifer, p.167" for example, would appear as "Pettifer 2002, p.167" with an automatic link to the relevant volume below. As per policy guidelines, this requires consensus before being enacted. Views welcomed! Hchc2009 (talk) 08:57, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed change to citation style...
MediaWiki talk:Alreadyrolled

message: Is it possible to add the edit summary to this message?  It's useful to know whether it was a reversion/rollback or not.  Bovlb (talk) 00:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Please replace 
Cannot roll back edit to :$1 by $2 (talk · block · contribs) because someone else has edited the page.
with
Cannot roll back edit to :$1 by $2 (talk · block · contribs) because someone else has edited the page.
to hide the block link from non-admins who can use rollback (like me). Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 23:24, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done  I think you want a span in there not a div? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have no idea, so whatever you think is best. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 16:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

text: But, I can confirm that it is indeed hidden --DannyS712 (talk) 16:33, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: A div box makes it go on a new line — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 16:33, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 16 March 2019
Talk:Full fiscal autonomy for Scotland and Wales

message: Shouldn't there be some sort of discussion before changing the name and subject of this article. It has been about Full fiscal autonomy for Scotland for 14 years of its existence, until it was renamed by a Welsh nationalist editor on 26 October. Sionk (talk) 16:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's inappropriate to politically label people you don't know. Bold page name changes are within Wikipedia rules and Devo-max has been proposed multiple times for Wales, so this was not a controversial move. No problem if you want to revert the page name move and follow up with a discussion. Titus Gold (talk) 17:02, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Myself and others are certainly familiar at WikiProject Wales with your edits on Wales articles, your habit of hijacking other peoples' work to create various content forks, generaly leaving a trail of chaos behind you. This seems to be yet another example. But I'd be interested to hear the opinion of someone who has developed this article over the last 14 years. Sionk (talk) 19:08, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wikipedia is free to be edited by all and nobody owns a page. Would you prefer to keep this as a joint page on devo-max for Scotland and Wales or would you prefer I made a page specifically about devo-max for Wales? Titus Gold (talk) 19:14, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made nothing but cited and relevant additions here. Please consider comments before posting and ensure they are accurate and appropriately constructive. Titus Gold (talk) 19:15, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the point isn't it - are additions about devo-max for Wales relevant to an article about devo-max for Scotland?  If it was up to my opinion, I'd say a separate article would be better, to cover Wales devolution. Sionk (talk) 21:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page and subject change
Talk:Rico

message: Oops.  Ignore/delete previous.  Found it, although seems buried at bottom under other uses.  Just missed it somehow.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.153.86.114 (talk) 02:37, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

message: The acronym Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is much better known (at least in the U.S.) than the other definitions here.  I moved it to the top.  LaTeeDa (talk) 01:18, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Racketeering acronym moved to top

message: This page ought to include a reference to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act.  Seems that was intent of previous comment above, but don't see it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.153.86.114 (talk) 02:28, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  RICO page shows no ref to racketeering
Talk:Juno (soundtrack)

message: On XM Radio, they played the Ellen Page/Michael Cera version of "Anyone Else But You" and it was just near 3 minutes long.  I think the track listing might be slightly mixed up on the page. - Flatsky (talk) 01:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No This was copied from my copy (playing in Winamp.) I guess they had some alternate version that is not actually on the soundtrack, or they included bits from the movie to pad it for an extra minute. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 01:30, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Anyone Else But You

message: Why? Two tags were added to this page, and I am not sure why:  and . Could you please explain what is wrong with this article as-is? Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:58, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 
Talk:Vietnamese morphology

message: "Vietnamese is often erroneously considered to be a "monosyllabic" language."  I have issues with this statement, not the least of which is that this statement has no references.
I do not know of any Vietnamese "morpheme" that cannot stand alone i.e. every Vietnamese word consists of a single morpheme, which morpheme always can stand alone.  Since there are no Vietnamese morphemes that can not stand alone, every Vietnamese morpheme is a word, and therefore Vietnamese is a monosyllabic language.
Supply a reference to support the "Vietnamese is not a monosyllabic language" claim, or name at least one Vietnamese morpheme that cannot stand alone, else "Vietnamese is not a monosyllabic language" is wrong and needs to be corrected.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aqn (talk • contribs) 04:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The answers are in the article actually. Along with the references in the bibliography. – ishwar  (speak) 05:06, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vietnamese monosyllabic or not? 
Template talk:Mosquito Fleet

message: This template seems bigger than needed, and not very focussed.  To me, the landings section should just be removed.  Those articles are only marginally related to the core subject.  It's better to remain focus and avoid information overload in the navbox by keeping the emphasis on subjects more closely related to the Mosquito Fleet such as the vessels, companies, captains, etc). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 22:19, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: right, chopped out a lot, looks a lot better.Mtsmallwood (talk) 02:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - I agree, looks much better. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Template cleanup?
Talk:WWWK

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the current radio station call letters are the primary identification and the former callsign of the other station is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the television station.- Dravecky (talk) 06:19, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Pardes Institute of Jewish Studies

message: Current language reads like an advertisement for the institution. Parts of it are written in the first person ("our" programs etc.) appears to have been self-sourced. Pardes is a well-known institution and it should be possible to obtain reliably-sourced material on it. 69.126.2.102 (talk) 02:30, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  text too advertisement-like 
Talk:Ryszard Bender

message: *This article has been classified as a stub due to its level of detail. Capitalistroadster (talk) 02:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Classified as a stub

message: I am afraid that Bender's claim to fame is the Holocaust-denial episode and conservative antisemitic comments. The denial aspect must be in lead in some form. TrangaBellam (talk) 12:14, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: TrangaBellam (talk) 18:28, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holocaust Denial 

message: * The Post-Communist Condition: Public and private discourses of transformation - Order ILL
===GW===
* https://lublin.wyborcza.pl/lublin/7,48724,19672015,nie-zyje-ryszard-bender-polityk-i-profesor-kul.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/duzyformat/7,127290,5826728,trzecie-zycie-ryszarda-bendera.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/7,76842,447533.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/7,76842,908666.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/magazyn/7,124059,15089117,anderman-poczciwiec-jadowity.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/7,75398,4974606.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/7,76842,1190268.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/alehistoria/7,121681,29136370,profesor-bender-dr-ryba-i-ksiadz-guz-nie-wzieli-sie-znikad.html TrangaBellam (talk) 18:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: * https://lublin.wyborcza.pl/lublin/7,48724,19672015,nie-zyje-ryszard-bender-polityk-i-profesor-kul.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/duzyformat/7,127290,5826728,trzecie-zycie-ryszarda-bendera.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/7,76842,447533.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/7,76842,908666.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/magazyn/7,124059,15089117,anderman-poczciwiec-jadowity.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/7,75398,4974606.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/7,76842,1190268.html
* https://wyborcza.pl/alehistoria/7,121681,29136370,profesor-bender-dr-ryba-i-ksiadz-guz-nie-wzieli-sie-znikad.html TrangaBellam (talk) 18:34, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: GW
Talk:Norman H. Anderson

message: This man was a professor at UCLA and has made significant contributions to the field of Social Science. As soon as I figure out how to link this page to other theories of his I'll let you know.
Obviously, as the reviewing administrator I declined to speedy-delete it, but you've got to say a little more about his career to make an article: at least his degrees, his exact academic positions, the awards and editorships and other distinctions he's undoubtedly won, and some indication of what his his most important or most cited articles. anything you can find specifically written about him from a third party source is also very important here. And sign your post on talk pages with 4 tildes. DGG (talk) 04:07, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Sensory cue

message: "A sensory cue is a statistic or signal that can be extracted from the sensory input by a perceiver"
Is it just me, or is this a bit jargon-ish?
:Agreed, the existence of this article strikes me as odd. Dranorter (talk) 06:40, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There does not seem to be enough references to support all the information in this article. For example, the Auditory cues section is probably the largest with 12 subsections but only has 3 references throughout. I plan to look through each subsection and find secondary sources to support them. Brando009 (talk) 05:37, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of Sources
Talk:NComm

message: * Amiga is one of the most groundbreaking computers in terms of multimedia and multitasking performance for a low price. And certiainly achived really high sales.
* NComm is one of the most popular shareware terminal programs for Amiga.
Please concentrate on creating content, rather than nitpicking the notability.
Electron9 (talk) 02:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)