lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sesame chicken

message: Do not remove editing comments unless they have been addressed. That is very bad practice. Ketchup/catsup is indeed used in General Tso's chicken sauce by many Chinese chefs in North America, as sources show. Badagnani 01:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment was addressed then removed, what is your damage?24.185.105.199 01:38, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletions by 24.185.105.199 

message: The text "although in buffet-style restaurants it generally appears as chicken pieces only" was accurate, and the added "at table" is un-idiomatic, ungrammatical English. Badagnani 01:31, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While the bit about the buffet is accurate, it is also unneeded and redundant, of course a buffet serves buffet style.  I removed the nonsense about catsup because it was commented out, inaccurate, and I listed the proper sauce ingredients.24.185.105.199 01:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Further deletions by 24.185.105.19

message: I've added a photo as requested, and removed the photo request template.  As for the ketchup dispute, I've been through about 30 cookbooks and spent a great deal of time at cooksillustrated.com, food.com, and other sites and can find NO evidence at all of tomato use in sesame chicken or general's chicken; just variations on the H2O, vinegar, sugar, sherry, cornstarch combo.  If one of you has a source for the ketchup use please cite it (even our article on general's chicken says it is rarely used and that has no cited source either. L0b0t 14:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources don't say the recipe is similar to GTC; they say it is identical, with the only difference of the added sesame seeds. Badagnani 05:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Which is what the article already states.  You really need to stop being so pedantic. Cheers. L0b0t 13:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article cleanup

message: Why was this text removed without comment?
 Badagnani 22:19, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This seemed to totally contradict.  The sentences suggest the origin is a mystery, yet the dish was meant to be spicy?  It's questionable since it is claiming an original taste without knowing the origin. Benjwong 22:36, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I like to think of General T chicken as sweet, spicy.  And this one as sweet.  The history stuff is tough to trace.  The article is making a friendly comparison.  Ideally they are really really different. Benjwong 22:56, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletions

message: The article says this is a "syncretic dish".  Can we find a more common word for this?  Perhaps hybrid or fusion?  RJFJR (talk) 01:24, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: syncretic
Talk:Bill Conkright

message: There was another standing article on the same individual at Red Conkright. I am taking the liberty of merging content of the two pages there. Note some of the history is attached to this redirect page. Carrite (talk) 02:14, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Boldly merging
Talk:Electroacoustic improvisation

message: Aei is not anti-virtuosic per se, the medium does not lend itself to virtuosity, for starters, laptops, controllers, soft-ware has been around long enough for people to develop a high degree of "instrumental control".  However, there are many instrumental virtuous who combine eai elements with their, or an acoustic part of an electoacoustic ensemble.
The table top guitar is not "very predominant" in eai.  It is debatable whether it is an electoracoustic instrument anymore than an electric guitar is.
Although John Cage employed live electronics, he was adamantly opposed to improvisation.
Eai didnt draw influence from free improvisation, it has been part of it for most of its history. People say are otherwise are ignorant of its history, Johny-come latelys with their apple macs.
viz Hugh Davis and Music Improvisation Company, Gentle Fire, or Tony Oxley and his amplified/ring modulated drum kit, etc. etc
Stockhausen's Intuitive music is little different from free improvisation often performed with electoacoutic elements and treatments.
Why are Morton Feldman or Pierre Schaeffer and  musique concrète, are being name-checked other than as name dropping?
I don't think much open-source software is used for eai, PD and Supercollider aren't easy to use.  Most common software Max/MSP and audiomulch to a lesser extent.
In all a crap article, with some awkwardly phrased sentences, irrelevances and grave omissions (too anglophone: Musica Elettronica Viva, Taj Mahal Travellers?)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.193.180 (talk) 22:25, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagrements Etc
Talk:Chapter (religion)

message: This whole article is a copyvio; it's been cut and pasted nearly verbatim from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/03582b.htm. NetherlandishYankee 01:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Public Domain source -- SECisek 20:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vio

message: Probably won't happen since no one wants to clean up 500+ incoming links, but this isn't the  of "Chapter (religion)": the textual divisions of the Bible, Koran, Vedas, &c. are. The original editor should have dabbed this as "Chapter (ecclesiastical)", "Ecclesiastical chapter", "Chapter (church)", or similar. — LlywelynII 06:59, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:No. 1 Long Range Flight RAAF

message: Hi Nick, unless you had a burning desire to write it first, Cuming is on my long list of RAAF bios, mainly given he has an entry in Stephens & Isaacs' High Fliers (always a help). Also, somewhere in my personal collection I have a colour shot of that Canberra at Amberley's gate from a visit years ago -- if I ever manage to dig it out it might be worth installing here. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:24, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Ian; I wasn't planning on writing the article on Cuming, though he seems to have had an interesting career. The photo of A84-201 would be great, though I guess non-essential as there's a photo of the aircraft as it appeared during the race. Nick-D (talk) 02:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Cuming
Talk:Van Wassenaer

message: Just created this page as a translation from the Dutch article van Wassenaer.  There were two words in there that I could not figure out the defition of: "Hoeks-gezinde" (used to describe Filips van Wassenaer) and "vlootvogd" (used as the position held by Jacob van Wasenaer Obdam, for which I just used the word admiral).  If any of the Dutch native speakers on WikiProject Netherlands knows of a better translation for these, please add it into the article.  Thanks!
--NetherlandishYankee 01:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Abbeycwmhir

message: Um, whats the purpose of the picture of the red kite?  
Rogutaan 01:58, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've restored the Cities project banner. Please have a look at the project scope (at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities). It includes all human settlements, irrespective of size or formal status. I think that it is too broad brush, but, as a project member, I abide by the consensus. Folks at 137 (talk) 06:47, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WPCities project
Talk:Arnott's Shapes

message: Hi, first time editing Wikipedia but I'm just going to undo some vandalism by 180.200.148.248 and also fixing a typo. Any experienced editors, please fix if I've done something wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.176.161.10 (talk) 18:12, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undoing vandalism 

message: There's a *massive* amount of news articles about this event. Should it be added to the page?
115.70.207.78 (talk) 06:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  2016 recipe controversy 

message: Why was information in relation to the new Indonesian shapes removed? (information added 5 July 2016‎ 58.164.2.157)
They are now selling in Indonesia and I think the Wikipedia page should reflect that the brand has expanded into other countries.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.54.47 (talk) 06:37, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indonesian Market 
Talk:Kugyō

message: In this list of court positions, I just wonder if the bold font is helpful?  
Or perhaps the 'bold font may be perceived as distracting?
Compare the format template of this article with that of Daijō-kan.  If the fonts are not appropriate there, then I'd guess they should be modified in this context as well?
Any thoughts? --Ooperhoofd (talk) 17:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Bold font?

message: Removed Military History Tag as article is out of scope.  --dashiellx (talk) 19:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Canons Regular of the Order of the Holy Cross

message: There are two articles with exactly the same content. Williamb (talk) 03:36, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Double articles

message: I just noticed the below comment, which was inserted in the actual article (below the proposed-merger box) on June 28, 2009. (I agree with the comment, which opposes a merger. Eagle4000 (talk) 20:57, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  proposed merger 

message: I have reverted the work of  because of several problems it introduced. For one, the new content was not wikified at all. There were no links to other articles. Also, it removed all categories and interwiki links that had been assigned to the page. It also removed the one reference that had been there and replaced it with non-inline references. If you wish to make such sweeping changes to an article then you should discuss them and achieve consensus first before undertaking the work. I also tagged the article with  because, as it stands, it only contains one reference. Elizium23 (talk) 19:30, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 

message: Since there is more than one religious order called "Crosiers" it is wrong to call this one by an ambiguous name. The other articles on specific Crosiers institutes have fully-specified names, so it is WP:CONSISTENT to keep this one fully-qualified as well. Elizium23 (talk) 13:10, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move reverted
Talk:Hryhoriy Surkis

message: having some references in this article would be nice....... No hurry do, since it is not a highly important man. — Mariah-Yulia • Talk to me! 17:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  If someone has the time.... 

message: Beaten by Omelchenko then. Ukrained2012 (talk) 10:28, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also a Mayoral Candidate in 199something 
Talk:Vanilla extract

message: The aging process should be mentioned. Bourbon barrels.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.14.242.99 (talk) 17:53, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I don't see why the section is here and don't think it is necessary. Kobitate94 (talk) 19:48, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intoxication section really necessary? 

message: I just saw vanilla extract listed as forbidden for muslims. If it is true, I think it is worth mentioning and I'd love to know why.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.113.0.231 (talk) 13:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it haraam? 

message: The article is about "vanilla extract", but has only a trivial description of extract.  It wanders into the topic of "flavoring" and "imitation" (neither of which are "vanilla extract") and then veers totally off-topic, describing rare cases of ppl intoxicated on the 35% ethanol extract.
This is a MESS!
107.10.15.185 (talk) 07:03, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This wiki entry should be deleted. 

message: I was directed here by Google when I searched vanilla essence. Is essence extract or artificial? 2001:1970:5164:3D00:C8B5:8934:6F49:7825 (talk) 04:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  essence vs extract 

message: Should we assume that 35% means 35 volume percent? And if so, WHY should we have to assume anything?? Actually, no, we shouldn't have to assume what the editors didn't, but SHOULD HAVE, articulated.98.21.213.85 (talk) 04:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Percent
Talk:Chenille fabric

message: This article confuses fiber, yarn, and fabric ("the yarn is made from cotton fabric") and needs attention from an expert. - PKM 02:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Problems involving arithmetic progressions

message: Just a heads up: I am writing an article on Primes in arithmetic progression (not finished and uploaded yet). PrimeHunter 02:41, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now created Primes in arithmetic progression. PrimeHunter 01:38, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Well spotted. The shown number is correct. I have corrected the digit count from 92 to 93. PrimeHunter 02:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primes in arithmetic progression
Talk:Dead letter mail

message: The two articles are both very short and are about the same topic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.39.176.100 (talk) 19:08, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dead_letter_mail#Merger_proposal Addedentry (talk) 12:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose because undeliverable mail is not always dealt with in a dead letter office. I can and is dealt with in the most convenient post office, sorting office, or dead letter office. ww2censor (talk) 23:37, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  What about an article about undeliverable mail itself which elaborates on the existence of dead letter offices, while mentioning how they are not always used, instead of rolling the concept of undeliverable mail into an article about offices which deal with it. The concept of dead letters seems like it would be more suited for being its own article because it is a more broad topic.  Matt Sylvester  Talk  15:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the above. The articles should be merged into an article with the title Dead letter mail. Bus stop (talk) 13:56, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Per Matt.syl, support merging into Dead letter mail, more general topic. I will do it next time I get a moment. Jdcooper (talk) 23:54, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The original merge proposal is dead on arrival but an expanded Dead letter mail article that includes Dead letter office information may work because Undeliverable mail is dealt with in different places, such as, sorting offices, regular post offices and Dead letter offices. The consensus seems to be clearly against the original merge but the reverse seems like a reasonable one. ww2censor (talk) 17:34, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not merge this with Dead Letter Office? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:22, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Dead letter mail →  – Dead letter and dead letter mail are two terms for the exact same thing. Best to go with the shorter and simpler title. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:56, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 16 February 2022
Talk:Plate block

message: The caption for the pic of the U.S. Olympic bobsled makes a statement --- the discouraging of collectors --- without any proof.
My own personal experience directly contradicts what is stated.
The increase in cost from a 4-stamp block to either a 6- or 8-stamp block was negligible at most. Especially given the cost of stamps at the time.  2600:8800:395:B000:E155:769A:F355:F5B5 (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's the citation/proof ?
Talk:Grindin'

message: I'll expand this at some point, heres some sources:
https://books.google.com/books?id=2N67CgAAQBAJ&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&dq=Grindin%27+clipse&source=gbs_navlinks_s
https://books.google.com/books?id=CcNHQ-8NReEC&pg=PA230&dq=Grindin%27+clipse&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiZo4XAi8znAhXfl3IEHdBfDNU4ChDoATADegQIBxAC#v=onepage&q=Grindin'%20clipse&f=false
https://books.google.com/books?id=FnyfAAAAMAAJ&q=Grindin%27+clipse&dq=Grindin%27+clipse&hl=en&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiZo4XAi8znAhXfl3IEHdBfDNU4ChDoATAFegQIBRAC
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-the-society-for-american-music/article/that-ill-tight-sound-telepresence-and-biopolitics-in-posttimbaland-rap-production/B7BAE82DBE300CDF0556AAEFADEBD67D
I think I know someone who has access to the first book. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI!  13:22, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: The Music Video === https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TjWAWcx4xdE BloodDraco (talk) 08:02, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Video
Talk:Royal College of Radiologists

message: Currently this list is rather short, and the criteria for listing are not clear. At the moment it fails in several respects, but mainly as a comprehensive list of distinguished (?definition) fellows and ex-fellows, either by exam or honorary election. 
Whilst all of the entries are interesting, some are a bit gushing,and would not pass muster in other similar pages in Wikipedia.
Proposal:
Delete the whole section and replace with the following:
Almost all consultant radiologists and clinical oncologists practising in the UK are Fellows of the Royal College of Radiologists through a competitive series of exams taken during higher specialist training. There are also a small number of Honorary Fellows.
Jellytussle (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: since there have been no objections in the 6 months or so since the above proposal, I have changed the section accordingly. Jellytussle (talk) 16:18, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Fellows 

message: The RCR page is neglected and inadequate.
The function, structure, and scope of the college is unclear as written.
The Fellowship is not properly described, the FRCR exam describes only the radiology exam and does not mention the clinical oncology exam. There is no mention of Fellowship without exam, college medals, overseas exams or fellows.
The list of fellows is short and has no obvious consistency or rationale.
etc, etc.
I will start to rewrite the page. Grateful for any comments or suggestions. In the absence of any other recent contributions I am assuming this is OK. Some critical conversation will be helpful. Jellytussle (talk) 07:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs a refresh and a re-write
Talk:Pedro Lemebel

message: the following info at the top of the article seems wrong:
This name uses Spanish naming customs: the first or paternal family name is Lemebel and the second or maternal family name is Mardones.
shouldn't the first name be Mardones and the second name Lemebel? --FeanorStar7 11:32, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: naming issue
Talk:The Right to Rock

message: ...I would rate this article as a STUB. It has the basic elements found in albums but there is much room for improvement from anyone with knowledge of this band. I created the page but I know there's room for improvement...I'm too new at this to be of expert advice though--ZapperZippy 03:07, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Good Golly, Miss Molly

message: What the heck does "Sure like to ball" mean?  Modern meaning is dirty.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.229.4.2 (talk) 18:58, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: "to ball" has the same indifferent meaning as "to rock": in one hand "have a party, good times; dancing" on the other "sex". --Krächz (talk) 10:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

message: "Little Richard first heard the phrase "Good golly, Miss Molly" from a Southern DJ named Jimmy Pennick."
Where is this information from? There is no further evidence of a DJ with that name but only in this context. Any idea? --Krächz (talk) 12:30, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: IT seems to come from Little Richard here []  Carptrash (talk) 22:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jimmy Pennick 

message: I have just discovered this music video clearly related to the movie King Ralph. Was there a new version recorded for the occasion at the time of the movie release? Is this version with Goodman considered one official video of the song?--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  King Ralph
Talk:Hair (Hair song)

message: Blimey, someone expand this. I'm disappointed I am.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 (talk) 19:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

message: The mega-super hit show "Glee" featured a mash-up of this song and "Crazy in Love" so that HAS TO BE MENTIONED HERE!190.59.13.81 (talk) 00:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLIMEY SOMEONE NEEDS TO EXPAND THIS! 
Talk:Have You Ever Needed Someone So Bad

message: Hi,
just double checking I can add the genre "glam metal" to this song.
Explicitly referenced in this article: https://whatculture.com/music/10-cheesiest-glam-metal-songs-ever-written?page=7 AgentKozak (talk) 15:13, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre add "glam metal"
Talk:Heart Full of Soul

message: The text does not specify the main vocalist. 
:Added highlighted part: "the vocal parts by  Keith Relf". —Ojorojo (talk) 14:40, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Singer

message: It's meaningless to speak of whether or not this is the first song using a sitar. The song as we know it does not have a sitar part. To even claim that this is the first song to even demo is sitar in a recording studio would take research which would be a waste of time. Jackhammer111 (talk) 02:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sitar
Talk:Diffusion (acoustics)

message: I have uploaded renderings of MLS and Quadratic Residue diffusors, if anyone can provide a link etc giving a way to calculate the geometry of a primative root diffusor, or any other types, let me know. Noodle snacks 03:26, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a link to a Primitive Root Diffusor calcuator: http://www.oliverprime.com/prd/ Do you have a source for the absorption notch effect? Solarbird (talk) 18:00, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I don't have access to the software I used to make the other drawings any more though. I probably could have just calculated things by hand nowadays anyway. Unfortunately the earliest revisions of the article have been lost. I am not sure if I added that line about the absorption notch effect or not. I had a quick look through one or two acoustics texts on my shelf, but I couldn't spot that line in my cursory examination. JJ Harrison (talk) 08:18, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

text:  a rendered image of a QRD-one dimensional - free of copyrights.Musicproducer (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: How woould a primary root diffuser like like? Is there animation too? Correctorgrande (talk) 21:22, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  PRD