lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Holocaust deniers

message: :— anthony[cfc] 00:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You go to Nick Griffin and edit the entry that says "Category:Holocaust deniers". It should say "Griffin, Nick". Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 11:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early discussions 

message: I think we need to include Jean Beaufret as well. He supported the statements made by Robert Faurisson. (Hektorza 19:00, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jean Beaufret 

message: Would there be good value if this category were subcategorized by nationality where there are sufficient people to populate a subcategory? Hmains (talk) 03:40, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no article on him so he can't be included. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 06:17, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: subcategorization

message: Per the recent RFC, about which I disagreed, persons may not be categorized as anti-Semitic. As such this category about persons may not include :Antisemitism as a parent category. I am happy to see and support anyone who is willing to complain about the status quo, but it is what it is. I have a lot to do to carry out the RFC's decision, but I will circle around back to this. -- Kendrick7talk 01:58, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persons may not be categorized as anti-Semitic 

message: Issam Naaman is listed under the letter I, how do I list him under the letter N? GingerBreadHarlot (talk) 15:24, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Add  anywhere on the page.  The standard place to add it, is right before the first category. It will sort on Category pages by Last name, then first name. Mathglot (talk) 21:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Letter N 

message: :Category:French Holocaust deniers only has 12 articles in it, have any other nations reached this? Surely there's enough to make a :Category:American Holocaust deniers or similar? I'm not sure on the name though, should it be :Category:Holocaust deniers from the United States? There's not just North America but also South America. Ranze (talk) 03:31, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Update, chose the first for now, could move if it's a problem. Also started on Australia/Canada. There seem to be a lot of English/British/UK people but I am not sure how to stylize that category, they're not exactly always synonymous right? Ranze (talk) 04:02, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: small categories were merged, see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2021_July_4#Category:Holocaust_deniers_by_nationality.  – Fayenatic London 13:47, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: National subcategories
Talk:Derren Brown

message: *The article writes, "the title character faked his own death". Would this be better replacing "title" (a noun) with "titular" (an adjective) or even "eponymous"? I think it would be clearer and more encyclopeadic.
*The article writes, "pointing to his CastingCallPro account as evidence". Would this be good to link to Digital casting as "CastingCallPro" is obscure and obsolete (apparently they are now known as Mandy)?
*The article writes, "A year after Brown attended the class, he received a number of letters saying that he would receive another certificate (...) for keeping in touch. After ignoring their request," but no request is mentioned. He is just told he will receive the second certificate as a result of keeping in touch. I suggest removing the clause "After ignoring their request," entirely as it is confusing.
*The article writes, "Brown came out as gay" which I think should be wikilinked to Coming out of the closet because this is specifically an idiom; an idiom whose meaning is not at all apparent from its literal words, and which is unlikely to translate faithfully and clearly when English wikipedia pages are robotically translated to other languages. Wikilinkinig it cleans up all confusion. 49.181.181.157 (talk) 14:09, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protection
Talk:Centaurus A/M83 Group

message: Karachentsev uses some names that are unconventional by astronomy standards.  I have attempted to replace these names with more common catalog names when appropriate.  In some cases, Karachentsev's designations are the only ones attached to the objects, so they should be used.
Notes on looking up specific desginations in the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED):
*Objects labeled with "KK" may be found in NED using "[KK98]".
*Objects labeled with "KKs" may be found in NED using "[KK2000]".
*"Cen 7" may be found in NED using "[CFC97] CEN 7".
For example, a search on "KKs 55" in NED should be done using "[KK2000] 55".
Dr. Submillimeter 11:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes on Karachentsev names

message: It is said in this article "However, the galaxies around Centaurus A and the galaxies around M83 are physically close to each other, and both subgroups appear not to be moving relative to each other" - with the Karachentev 2005 paper as reference, when what that paper actually says is"The group of
galaxies around M83 (=NGC 5236) actually has the same mean radial velocity (+308 km s�1) as the Cen A Group (+312 km s�1),
but the distance from us appreciably larger (4.56 Mpc) than that
of the Cen A Group (3.66 Mpc)." 
So can we say they are they close to each other or not? Alexander110 (talk) 06:40, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Groups near to each other?
Talk:Zénon Bacq

message: Article created to provide additional information on science in Belgium. Pvosta 11:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Why is this article at such a strange name, when the article itself only refers to him as Zénon Bacq?  See Wikipedia:Naming conventions.
Of course, it is also improper that the above appears as a redlink.  If a second given name exists, it is okay to include it in text (make a redirect for it, too, if that is done).  For now, I plan to move it which will make Zénon Bacq blue. If you think something else is proper after carefully considering the naming conventions, explain why here and then move it. Gene Nygaard (talk) 15:23, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming conventions and hidden away
Talk:Marc de Hemptinne

message: Article created to provide additional information on science in Belgium. Pvosta 11:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Amway Arena

message: Oh crud, I moved it before reading the whole article. The name is still pending City Council approval. But I'm scared to try and move it back.
Besides, I doubt the City Council will decline the owner of Magic, who owns Amway.
My bad. --Kitch (Talk : Contrib) 11:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming

message: Should the TD Waterhouse Centre logo still be there? I'm pretty sure the name was approved by the city. Gate28 18:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TD Waterhouse Logo
Talk:Wiligut runes

message: I will add the names, meaning and images soon.
:Sent these through from a mate, the links not the files. He tells me he will get the runic row so this should help and and anyone here that wants to expand this article with facts as these are HIS writings from the Secret King. These were not scanned, I think he found them on the net, a German site if I am sure.
Wiligut’s Runology:
*PAGE 01 | PAGE 02 | PAGE 03
But, all of the above, can be found in text format HERE. (on this link CTRL and F 'Wiligut's Runology')
Runic key:
* PAGE 01 
"Whispering of Gotos - Rune-Knowledge".
This is where he reveals his rune row as with the link in the main article in "External links".
*PAGE 01 | PAGE 02 | PAGE 03 | PAGE 04 | PAGE 05 | PAGE 06 | PAGE 07 | PAGE 08 | PAGE 09 | PAGE 10 | PAGE 11 | PAGE 12
Also, see The Wiligut Saga  by Adolf Schleipfer
Also, see The Wiligut Mystery
All of this information apart from the scanned images above is from HERE
I just hope that a decent WIki article can be made out of all of this information. FK0071a 16:32, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just what is a runic row? --KJK::Hyperion 02:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Runic row"
Talk:The Flying Inn

message: I am curious how a term coined in 2005 and not mentioned at all in this article can be justified by WP:CATV as cited to a reliable, secondary source and suitable for inclusion as a category? Elizium23 (talk) 09:32, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not a great deal of Chesterton literary scholarship around, he seems to be written off as a bit beneath serious interest (compare C S Lewis, of whom academics will never shut up). However if you read the text itself (there are PD copies linked here) the closeness of his portrayal to the (far later) Eurabia concept is quite clear. He's not so frothingly racist as most modern users of Eurabia tend, but he's right there on the theme of sharia being absorbed through a form of Methodist Temperance (he wasn't all that keen on Methodists to start with). Oddly his sympathies here seem to lie more with a pagan Englishness, as  The Rolling English Road, and a sense of bucolic Bacchanalianism as the English birthright. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:36, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: My, my, that is a good dose of WP:OR. Thanks for the education. What we're looking for is something to directly correlate the 2005 concept of "Eurabia" with all those points you brought up. Analysis by secondary sources is the typical way this is accomplished on Wikipedia, not by making a checklist and comparing columns on it. Elizium23 (talk) 10:40, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  BTW, Oriana Fallaci should go back under Eurabia too.  She pretty much invented it. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:42, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

text:  Yes, it's OR.  If you can find some secondary coverage of Chesterton and The Flying Inn, the article could certainly use it.  But Chesterton scholarship is thin and I've seen nothing at all on this one. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:44, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Eurabia"
Talk:Booka Shade

message: There are some pictures them at http://www.bookashade.com/, there's even a "press pack" there: http://physical-music.com/ftp/BookaShade.zip. I'm not sure about the licensing, but I think it's okay to use it.--Omarkj 12:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Dj Kicks" added to the discography--The REAL Teol 12:54, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: new album added to discography

message: I can't find it on booka shade site, but the album is listed on stores as Booka Shade album. Is there any reason to not be in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.82.135.122 (talk) 21:44, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cinematic Shade
Talk:Dimension 2400

message: I was going to put this article up for AfD, then I decided to make it a redirect instead. If you think that this is de facto deletion and disagree, please note that article as it stood was
* Blatant copyvio of this Dell page
* Pointless list of technical information (available elsewhere in same form anyway), not good encyclopedia article.
Now, if I had felt that the page warranted existing at all, I'd have removed the copyvio (and pointless) material and written a stub. But I don't believe that a specific Dell model warrants its own page unless it has something particularly special about it. Hence redirected to Dell Dimension. 
Fourohfour 12:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Changed to redirect
Talk:The Children of the New Forest

message: The Beverley children were minor gentry. They were not aristocracy.Royalcourtier (talk) 07:54, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aristocratic lifestyle  

message: A photograph exists of Princess Margaret leafing through a copy of the book. It can be seen in the documentary Elizabeth & Margaret Love and Loyalty @ . --Auric talk 16:30, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal mention
Talk:AJS V4

message: As part of the Motorcycling WikiProject I am working though all the missing articles and stubs for British Bikes.  To make things easier to sort out I have created a category for British motorcycles.   Please will you add to any British motorcycle pages you find or create.  It will also help to keep things organised if you use the Template:Infobox Motorcycle or add it where it is missing.  I've linked the Category to the Commons British Motorcycles so you could help with matching pics to articles or adding the missing images to the Commons - take your camera next time you go to a rally!  Thanks  Tony (talk) 19:20, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Category for British Motorcycles 
Category talk:Marketing

message: hi.Marketing on the internet should be highlighted.--Darrendeng 12:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: I think some sub categories are large and broad enough to become categories themselves. This category requires some clean up though, and many of the articles need to be moved to their sub categories. I am also wondering about the attention tag which seems unjustifiable since no valid reason has been given on this talk page.Λua∫Wise (talk) 18:06, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Category
Talk:Omurice

message: LOL.  I liked Lunch Queen (lunch no jou), but why an external link to it? :-) --C S (talk) 23:40, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good. Any recipes? Anyone... Anyone...?  Basket Feudalist  16:39, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Seriously, just grab a pan, add cooking oil, add already cooked rice, throw in some egg content. Salt for taste. My fav is a "spice pack" from instant noodles pack: it has both MSG and salt. 81.89.66.133 (talk) 06:29, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: External link

message: The article should be given at least mid-importance, since omurice is a popular yōshoku dish in Japan, Korea and Taiwan.--RekishiEJ (talk) 10:43, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the importance rating 

message: Omurice 180.252.117.73 (talk) 23:03, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  🗿
Talk:Energy tax

message: I've rewritten the intro using a book chapter by Fisher et al (1996) and a paper by Nellor (1994). I think these are far better sources than the SEPP link. I was also not happy with the way the previous revision made reference to the Kyoto Protocol. I see no need to make this reference. If it is to be made, it should be made in the body of the text. To be honest, I don't like the reference to the SEPP website at all. It is an anti-climate change website, and in my view, not a good source for what is an article about energy taxes. Enescot (talk) 20:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't like SEPP 
Talk:Asatte no Hōkō image albums

message: Nothing was merged. All you did was redirect the page. Absolutely no content was merged at all, so I've undone the redirect. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 04:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There wasn't much to merge, was there? The track listings don't belong on the main article, and each of the 2 albums had a sentence or two about them which I merged into Asatte no Hōkō#Anime.--十八 22:11, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged?
Talk:Starmania (TV series)

message: ???--84.114.201.91 13:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it is a poorly article. It needs formatting and it jumps from one fact ot the next without much connection between. In the German Wikipedia it would not survive in this form. -- CecilK 13:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

text: It does not mean that it will be deleted right now, it was just reported for clean up (aufräumen, sanieren). I presume you are German speaking so read this to understand better. -- CecilK 03:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Is "zusammenräumen" better? In case of a deletion one of template these would be shown. But the deletion could still happen. After some time people of the quality team will look through all articles with the clean-tag and if they see that nobody invested time in the article and it's still the same they probably will propose deletion. So if you think it is an important article you should do something for it (if you have questions I have a German account too). -- CecilK 14:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why cleanup?

message: This page should be speedy deleted because the Austrian Starmania does not exist anymore. This channel has been closed. --Chodo Habat (talk) 13:26, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely not. Also, the deletion process (speedy or AFD) must not be used to solve content disputes. The JPStalk to me 12:44, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

text: Friends has finished; but we won't be deleting that article, of course. This isn't any kind of reason to delete an article. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 19:30, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:David Field (actor)

message: Sorry this entry isn't very big but it is so hard to find info
on him Jellydonut456 13:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your efforts, however, it is important to remember that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and we must write from a neutral point of view. This means that writing things like someone is one of the "finest Australian actors of his generation" is not acceptable and has to be deleted. Please review the links that were placed on your talk page and don't hesitate to ask for help or advice. Sarah Ewart 16:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was that the name of the journal? The title is elusive. Doug butler (talk) 13:02, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''The Australian Organist''
Talk:Wild Life Sydney

message: I added information concerning the Award. I wasn't quite sure where to put it - the lead section would have done just as well. Feel free to move it around. Jame§ugrono 06:17, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Award? 

message: This article should be re-written. It reads like an advertisement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.43.138.234 (talk) 12:40, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-written
Talk:Turnpike Lane, Haringey

message: The list of residents referes to people from throught the borough rather than just turnpike lane itself. I should thus be removed or edited. Jt spratt 21:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Residents

message: I'd like to delete : The grand Edwardian tree lined square outside the station is known as Ducketts Common. While it may well be true that the common has been enclosed since Edwardian times and has a park/square like atmosphere. It is certainly much older than that and is probably the last piece of "virgin" unbuilt land in the area.  According to the Dorset plan of 1619, Ducketts reached across Tottenham as far as Broadwaters (Broadwater Farm). Your views?--IsarSteve 04:57, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'd say it's somewhat grandiose to call it grand. Most of the area was built for the lower middle classes - bank clerks and the like. The houses lining Ducketts were for the more prosperous amongst that group - and for my money they look like it. 
Ducketts Manor was a very large estate with a manor house to the northeast of the "square". What is left now was one of a series of strips of common land where people had the right to graze their animals; there was also Beans Green in Harringay - a strip of land to the West of Green Lanes opp St Anns Road (then called Hangar Lane). This was subsequently subsumed into the Harringay Park Estate.
For my money, I'd go for something like "At the Eastern End of the road, the southern side is bordered by Duckett's Common, once an area of common land where people had the right to graze their animals; now a small park with comfortable Victorian houses on two sides". I'll leave it to you.
hjuk 10:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ducketts Common
Talk:Wellington Zoo

message: The fact that polar bears are in WotWots does not prove whether or not they are at the zoo now. If the credits show a particular zoo (WotWots was filmed at three zoos according to the WikiPedia article), that only indicates that the animals were at the zoo when the filming was done. I can't seem to find a copy of the episode that I can view, but I also find no evidence on the Web sites (site search plus looking at the zoo maps) that the Wellington Zoo, the Auckland Zoo, or the Melbourne Zoo currently have polar bears, and it would be very unusual for a zoo not to list the largest carnivore if they have one. If someone finds a current reference to polar bears at any of these zoos, we can (and should) add polar bears to the animal list(s), but a TV show that was filmed several years ago does not constitute current evidence. Don Lammers (talk) 05:25, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Polar Bears at Wellington Zoo
Talk:Mike McKay (rower)

message: Changed the statements "four without coxswain" and "pair without coxswain" to coxless four and coxless pair respectively due to these being the  generally accepted as the common terms.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.174.69.196 (talk) 15:50, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  without coxswain
Talk:Bangladesh National Zoo

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:51, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:James Knight (explorer)

message: When will this article be completed?
Ld80061 (talk) 19:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Weierstrass factorization theorem

message: Article says:
:Holomorphic functions  can be factored:  If f is a function holomorphic in a region, \Omega, with zeroes at every point of  \lbrace z_i \rbrace_i \subset \mathbb{C}-\{0\} then there exists an entire function g, and a sequence…
What is \Omega?  Simply connected? Are the zeroes in \Omega? (where else!) Are they simple zeroes or multiple? I really doubt that the statement, has it stands now, is correct.  Everything would be fine if \Omega = \mathbf{C} and if the zeroes allow multiplicity, but I don't know what the editor really meant. --Bdmy (talk) 18:37, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean-up needed

message: Is the cosine formula correct?  I only ask because it goes to zero when z=0.  Psalm 119:105 (talk) 11:12, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cosine formula

message: In the right hand of both examples there are exponentials lacking.
It would be nice to give an example when the entire function does not have any zero (some exponential).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.10.1.186 (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: These factorisations are correct. The intermediate expression is the Weierstrass factorisation, which can be obtained for example by expressing sin and cos using gamma functions. The RHS can be found in, for example, Gradshteyn/Ryzhik 1.431. 138.38.106.191 (talk) 11:35, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples of factorization

message: The fact that every finite sequence of complex numbers is the set of zeros of some polynomial function is true, but not a consequence of the Fundamental of Algebra. Proof is that that claim is true for real numbers, and actually for any field.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.223.31.17 (talk) 10:10, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence of the Motivation