lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Joe Bonamassa

message: Any nickname or alternative name for the subject may not be added to the article without citing at least one published, reliable source that confirms that the name is commonly, frequently, and consistently used for the subject. Reddit, Instagram and other user-edited sources may not be used for this purpose, because they are not reliable. General Ization Talk   00:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickname

message: Heads up, this page is being brigaded by the subreddit r/guitarcirclejerk, which is why the page is being vandalized with stuff like "Bonermaster" and "TOAN&FEEL" (both common memes on the sub). Supernintendo64 (talk) 15:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Supernintendo64! —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 22:26, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  r/guitarcirclejerk brigading 

message: @Bobbysue097, you currently seem to be engaged in a edit war about material that is improbably sourced. I recombed you self-revert, as your over The three-revert rule, and then discuss why you think it should be retained. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 19:01, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Bobbysue ignored his warning and added it back anyway. Then when someone else took it down another person put it back up. I took it down again. The edit was posted on r/guitarcirclejerk and the tone of the information was sarcastic so I feel the edit was made in bad faith. Supernintendo64 (talk) 20:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Just as a quick note, Both accounts have now been blocked for sockpuppetry, so we're unlikely to here anything more from them. However, if anybody else feels compelled to re-add please discuss it here first. Cakelot1 ☞️ talk 20:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bobbysue097
Talk:Reliant Scimitar

message: :Image:Scimitar logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 21:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Scimitar logo.jpg

message: GTE SE6 section - paragraph 2 - "...a number of improvements including better quality, brakes and road-holding." Did the SE6 not have brakes!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.222.210.38 (talk) 22:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit suggestion
Talk:XB Browser

message: 2.9.4.28 is now click-wrapped with GPLv3, suggesting a license change. If anyone knows which exact version brought this change, I would be grateful. --NetRolller 3D 14:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Licensing changes 

message: I've checked the pages and information this article seems to refer to, but all it does is forward to the XeroBank service.
A number of problems with this article and the software it refers to:
* Software described is not a browser, but a bundled (ancient) Firefox. Meaning it's miscategorized. The browser offered is an unmodified Firefox with a number of bundled add-ons, including a rebranding add-on (firesomething) to make it appear as if it's a different browser.
* GPLed software released under a more restrictive license, that's not allowed, is it? The installer of the bundle states GPL, not a custom license like this article.
* Xerobank links are broken or forward to a nondescript anonymity service, unrelated to a browser product.
* Xerobank website referred to provides no compelling references, and in fact has a bogus "anonymity checker" that gives false results aimed at scaring people into buying their service: 
It seems this article is mislabeled and used solely to promote an unverified pay-for-anonymity service, not a custom browser. I'd say this is abuse of Wikipedia for commercial purposes.
It's full of misleading information.
Wolfbeast (talk) 22:29, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This software has always been a shameless attempt to swindle money out of uninformed people. Steve Topletz is despised in the anonymity community. I can't believe it has been on Wikipedia this long. 213.29.115.6 (talk) 21:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed all notes about TESLA (the license is now located at  ), but the "source code file" on the download page and the xB installer itself containing the GPL, although I couldn't find any real soruce code (only nsh files). mabdul 11:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Ok, reading the old code and searching at google, I will try to add and include back the license issues xB had. This is somehow interesting and disturbing. Since August 2011 no changes in a wiki, the blog didn't get any update since ages, the software itself is outdated (2009) and no other announcement on any page; many 404 at xerobank.com, are they go in insolence? mabdul 12:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOT a custom browser... links refer to an anonymity service. 
Talk:Stevens Pass

message: The change on 22 Jan 2020 is at worst wrong, and at best confusing and incomplete. The elevation at Steven's Pass is clearly labeled on a sign as 4,061 feet, and indicates that in the first sentence.  I don't know where the editor got 5,845 feet.  If he/she intends to say that highway 12 will at some other point reach that height, then it needs to indicate where. 
Dave.Tillman.6010 (talk) 17:28, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Edit? 

message: The page read more like a ski resort brochure than something about a mountain pass, so I reduced the information about the Stevens Pass Ski Area, which would be great on a page about the ski area, but is only tangentially related to the mountain pass, especially bits about how you can find lodging in Leavenworth.  That belongs on a page about the ski resort.  I took it off the category on ski places, since we're talking about a mountain pass here not a ski slope, and added a geography category and stub.  I realize it can be confusing since the ski resort and the pass share the same name, but they are really two different things.
Also, is the pass really named after John Frank Stevens?  I always thought it was named after Isaac Stevens, the first governor of Washington Territory.  Also, even though the page on John Frank Stevens says he discovered Stevens Pass in, apparently, the 1890s, I find that hard to believe.  Isaac Stevens was sending out railroad survey teams in the 1850s.  I'll check later when I have more time.
Finally, this page could use more information about the pass's history (building of the railroad and tunnels for example), its geography (mountains nearby and headwaters of rivers for example), and less on how many chair lifts there are and where to find a hotel.  Just saying.  Pfly 18:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was indeed named for John F. Stevens according to several sources. 8th Ohio Volunteers 14:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Rather than the sign, I think it would be much better to include a picture of the pass and surrounding mountains in winter. It's a very beautiful place. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.57.220.63 (talk) 17:03, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better picture 

message: Either the location stated in Wikipedia is wrong, or Google Maps is.  Can we get the actual location of Stevens Pass?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.138.32.33 (talk) 20:37, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What seems to be the inconsistency?--Kevmin (talk) 23:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: The "Cascade Tunnel" article gives an elevation of 2,881 ft, yet this article says that with a Stevens Pass elevation of 4,061 ft, the Cascade Tunnel is 2,000 ft below it. A simple calculation shows that the difference is actually 1,180 ft, not 2,000 ft (600 m). The photo at the pass shows 4,061 as the elevation there. Unless someone can show that Cascade Tunnel is not at 2,881 ft, then I will change the difference to 1,180 ft (360 m). LoneStar77 (talk) 12:52, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elevation Difference Discrepancy
Talk:Systems of Survival

message: I believe that this book is a notable work for its contribution to areas like moral philosophy, cultural anthropology, and memetic evolution, etc.  But what is needed are verifiable sources to cite before it would be approriate to put this publication or Jane Jacobs into other categories.  If anyone wanted to do a little research, this might be an area.  SteveWolfer 18:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jacobs and this book merit a wider set categories 

message: I created a good start for the article, but some areas are real skimpy - like a description of the conflicts arising out of following a percept from an opposing syndrome.  And I don't have any quotes or references from outside sources or book reviews.  I hope others will hop on in and make improvements and additions.  SteveWolfer 18:59, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs more content 

message: It is a great book and deserves better treatment.  I note that the article suggests that Jacobs actually holds the positions advocated by participants in a dialog, and that is by no means obvious.  Plato used dialog in a similar way and we do not necessarily attribute positions introduced in the dialog to Plato himself.  We are meant to continue the dialog, to take part.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.0.57.157 (talk) 22:54, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article doesn't acknowledge dialog form
Talk:Washington Street Elevated

message: Folowing the guidlines at Wikipedia:Handling_trivia, I removed the following piece of connective trivia that User:Raryel added and put it here on the talk page:
:: The Washington Street "El" can be seen in exterior shots of the fictional "St. Eligius Hospital," the setting of "St. Elsewhere," a television medical drama series about a hospital in an impoverished neighborhood.  The building posing as the hospital is adjacent to the elevated line and was still in operation when the series was filmed.
This piece of trivia already has an equivalent entry in the St_Elsewhere#Trivia section, where it seems more relevant. AdamMorton 01:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Elsewhere Trivia 

message: The Green Street link points at the Green Street station on the modern Orange Line, which I believe is in a slightly different place than the Green Street station being discussed in this article, which I would assume would have been at the corner of Green Street and Washington Street.  JNW2 (talk) 01:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Green Street link
Talk:Frank Jao

message: Somone had added:
I think Frank Jao also went to school in Danang.
--Imaginationac (Talk | Edits | Email) 00:03, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved speculation to talk page
Talk:KDWN

message: The claim about moving employees should be sourced or just deleted. Recent vandalism suggests that the fact is disputed. shotwell 19:04, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: I'm going to keep a watch on this page, as it seems to be a target for vandels. Since I know many of the people who worked there on a personal basis, I can keep a better record that some Marxo-Liberal nut who thinks he's doing the world good by being stupidly stupid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coffee4binky (talk • contribs) 15:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Watch 
Talk:Albion Woodbury Small

message: Is it really correct to say that Small "established" the American Journal of Sociology? Clearly he was its guiding light, editor, major promoter, and in the beginning frequent contributor, BUT President Harper was also important in funding its cost and giving the Unversity's time and some focus to the "establishment" of the Journal.
Also, shouldn't something be said about Small's attachment to German sociology and how he attempted to keep alive the collaboration and co-operation between German and American social scientists even during WW I?
24.31.126.26 19:09, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Delbarton, West Virginia

message: Would the YouthWorks mission in this town be notable enough to mention here?  – Minh Nguyễn (talk, contribs) 19:12, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ardennais

message: I find it really, really weird that the breed bans blacks but takes bays.  You cannot genetically get to bay without a black base coat.  What they must be trying to promote is homozygousity for the Agouti gene that suppresses black to the points, and is masked in chestnuts, which have no black.  Weird.  Montanabw(talk) 06:56, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I'm not sure what's up with that. The sad thing is that the breed is so rare that the breed registries are barely active and have no websites. I'm not even sure if the Great Britain registry is still in existance, and all I can find on the European registries is a physical address from several years ago. There's nothing in the US except for a couple of Yahoo groups that claim to be the beginnings of registries. W/e - more work for when I get home... Dana boomer (talk) 17:27, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

text: Ask Richard New Forest.  He may know something...he's our UK critters guy.   Montanabw(talk) 06:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assorted commentary
Talk:KWMZ-FM

message: Even though it's the kind of stuff I tend to add, the chronology of all the problems is getting a bit lengthy.  The sale of the station to Power Broadcasting has been completed.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 17:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: While I disagree with stripping out so much of the history, I must strenuously object to stripping out so many of the references that support what station history remains.  Proper referencing is in short supply in so many radio station articles that removing existing references makes no sense to me. - Dravecky (talk) 19:09, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sale to Power

message: It seems that KWMZ is no longer all-'80s; it's more like classic hits.
Somehow, I was able to hear the station for a few minutes last night...from Brandon, Mississippi.
Last night, I heard the Bee Gees' 1978 hit, "Love You Inside Out."
And on one other night (months ago), I heard Sheryl Crow's 1994 hit, "All I Wanna Do."
Obviously, KWMZ should have "The Greatest Hits of the '70s, '80s & '90s." Jeff S (talk) 05:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  KWMZ now has CLASSIC HITS
Talk:Asturcón

message: Hi JLAN, yeah, next time may be easier to just fix it.  I'll let you do that part and clean it all up.  (Noogies). Montanabw(talk) 23:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I created the subpage, Talk:Asturcón/Temp pasting in some stuff from a 2006 version of the article, which is probably also the Okie State material.   Go for the fix!  You'll need an admin to move it back into the mainspace, but they do it quickly once you ask.  Montanabw(talk) 00:06, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. Thanks for your help here. :) I'm afraid, though, that we can't use content from earlier versions of articles without attribution. In this case, it was easy enough to fix, though, since the content had been merged from another article. I just recreated the merge. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:02, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

text: I know that it was inadequate, but we had to start with something, and I wasn't the one with the time to do it, so I basically set things up so someone else who had the time would at least have a general idea of what to do.  Thanks for going in and at least getting rid of the big black box!  Montanabw(talk) 19:31, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup start
Talk:Brandenburger

message: Those wishing to work on this entry may find the following helpful:
1. Official statistics from the Central Documentation for Animal Biological Diversity in Germany  Links to description, which is that of the German Riding Horse, and population data.
2. TGRDEU data page for all German Riding Horses, including but not limited to Brandenburgers 
3. Pferdezuchtverband Brandenburg-Anhalt e.V. website  Note: English information has not been updated to reflect the cooperation between Brandenburg, Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia (2003). They have a joint breeding program.
4. "Showcase of the Best" website  describes the cooperative stallion licensing, elite auction, and championship shows of eastern Germany. The licensing is for both Saxony-Anhalt and Berlin-Brandenburg; I believe Mecklenburg-Vorpommern hosts it's own and that Saxony and Thuringia host their own.
5. Main and State Stud at Neustadt/Dosse website 
6. Eylers essay on Neustadt/Dosse 
7. Eylers essay on Radegast-Prussendorf 
8. FN Breeding Statistics 
9. WBFSH rankings for 2007: #27 in Jumping  from Konkret (Kolibri), Key Largo (Kolibri), Alfredo (Don Alfredo), Magnus (Matador). Unranked in Eventing and Dressage.
Countercanter (talk) 23:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links for the ambitious 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20031010072008/http://www.brandenburger-pferd.de/engl.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:26, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Xpand Rally

message: Currently I'm toiling on this page as hard as I can. If there are any other wikipedians who own the game/really know about it, please help! Thank you! :) --RedPooka 19:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stubby stub 

message: Currently this article reads like a commercial for the game rather than just an overview of what it is. Especially the first paragraph
"There are about 20 cars in the game." Can't someone give an exact number? 
"Our advanced vehicle physics" Whose advanced vehicle physics? the developers?
I'm not saying it IS an advertisement for the game, just that it reads like one, I'm sure someone with limited information on the game, just used some of the only sources they could find to add content, but it appears a lot of the sources were from marketing material from the developers themselves. Lmcgregoruk (talk) 11:44, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an advertisement. 
Talk:Private collection

message: I think this could be a good article that discusses some of the world's notable private art collections, plus how some art by famous artists cannot be viewed as they are housed in a private collection. There could also be discussion of notable art collectors, and their place in the art world. I am going to remove this template for the time being. If in five days, it is not a sufficient article, please re-prod it. - Zepheus <ツィフィアス> 19:20, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. I will place the wip tag on your behalf. Nehwyn 19:25, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod removal

message: just wondering if this should be moved to "List of Private Art Collections", with a brief description (like the one there already).  This article doesn't quite sound ok to me, but that may be just me...
Also, wouldn't a "private collection" be something other that art, like stamps, postcards, antiques, etc.?
Kolonuk 18:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  erm, just a quick question... 

message: There are private collections of poststamps, postcards, puppets etc, wich cannot be characterised as art collections. There is only reference to collectors of books and the name they are given. Smiley.toerist (talk) 12:29, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not always artwork
Talk:Contamination (film)

message: Alien Contamination is the name of the cut US version and the main name of the film is Contamination so I'd suggest a better home for this would be Contamination (film) (Emperor 17:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree ~ SEEnoEVIL punch the keys 10:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: Is this really an Italian language film?  Although dubbed (often very badly) it does appear that the majority of the cast are delivering their lines in English. Bladeboy1889 11:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Most Italian films for a long period of time are dubbed as they have several different actors speaking several different languages. I've left it blank as it's not clear currently what language was spoken on set by the cast or what language it premièred with. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:41, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language?
Talk:Burmese pony

message: I've inadvertently duplicated this page by creating Shan Horse. That was annoyingly dumb of me – though a few redirects might perhaps have prevented me from doing it. Since this page is without any citations at all, and almost none of it is supported by the very brief text in Summerhays, I can't see any better solution than to redirect this. I'd have copied over the image, except that it appears to be a copyvio (I've nominated it for deletion on Commons). Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:43, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicated article
Talk:Thomas Derrig

message: I've added in the Ryan report aspect - there's lots more in the report for those wanting more.Red Hurley (talk) 00:29, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: CICA 2009

message: What does that mean exactly? 99.237.143.219 (talk) 08:21, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: "an eye shot out"
Talk:Caspian horse

message: We understand we need to improve the Caspian Horse page. I am new to Wikipedia so I wonder if someone could please advise me as to how to improve it please? Many thanks Danielle Foster (talk) 14:37, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically, compare this article to similar short, but better-written ones, such as Suffolk Punch or Cleveland Bay, and try to make it more like them; better sources, improved formatting, and so on.  Here, we have photos up the wazoo (too many, really) but way too few footnotes. There's a lot of text, but we don't know where it came from, if it's accurate and most of all, if it was copied word-for word from someplace.  We need better (and reliable) sources added; usually at least one source per paragraph and often more (see, e.g. Thoroughbred as a good example).  Montanabw(talk) 03:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for advice regarding improving the page.