Talk:Atmospheric chemistry observational databases

message: I am slowly adding links to the data repositories for these datasets and the relevant wikipedia articles. Dlary 14:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

message: A large observational database of many different atmospheric constituents from a host of platforms is available. This was created as part of ESA Envisat and NASA Aura validation. It is of general use. Do you think it should be added to the article text? Dlary 03:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Observational Database 

message: Sections are needed on other instruments such as GOME on ERS-2 and the suite of Envisat instruments. Freewikidata 03:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The key point is that the instruments mentioned should give free access to their data. Dlary 03:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Instruments 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Atmospheric chemistry observational databases. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070225064435/http://www.autochem.info:80/constituentobservationaldatabase.html to http://www.autochem.info/constituentobservationaldatabase.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on Atmospheric chemistry observational databases. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070214031222/http://suborbital.nasa.gov/ to http://suborbital.nasa.gov/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060930215700/http://www.espo.nasa.gov/project/mission2.html to http://www.espo.nasa.gov/project/mission2.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070108203102/http://mozaic.aero.obs-mip.fr/web/features/database/access.html to http://mozaic.aero.obs-mip.fr/web/features/database/access.html
*Added archive https://archive.is/20011201094454/http://www.crista.uni-wuppertal.de/introduction.shtml to http://www.crista.uni-wuppertal.de/introduction.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205195349/http://www-ilas.nies.go.jp/index.html to http://www-ilas.nies.go.jp/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070301180400/http://wvms.nrl.navy.mil/POAM/poam.html to http://wvms.nrl.navy.mil/POAM/poam.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061208105210/http://haloedata.larc.nasa.gov/home/index.php?p=noframe_home.html to http://haloedata.larc.nasa.gov/home/index.php?p=noframe_home.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070213005923/http://toms.gsfc.nasa.gov/reflect/reflect.html to http://toms.gsfc.nasa.gov/reflect/reflect.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070128230043/http://aura.gsfc.nasa.gov/instruments/omi/index.html to http://aura.gsfc.nasa.gov/instruments/omi/index.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070701022622/http://www-iup.physik.uni-bremen.de/gome/ to http://www-iup.physik.uni-bremen.de/gome/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:06, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: This has already been mentioned, but there are an overwhelming number of atmospheric chemistry observations that this article misses.  Off the top of my head: (ground based) TCCON, the NOAA/ESRL surface network, (satellite based) SCIAMACHY, AIRS, MOPITT, IASI, GOSAT, OCO-2.  There is also NOAA's ObsPack which is an integrated collection of measurements of carbon species.  I believe GAW produces a similar product.
The aircraft section does a good job of linking to NASA's EVS because there are a ton of campaigns.
I could go about adding a lot of these, but I think the article would get really messy.  So my question is what should the scope of this article be?  Should it focus on all measurements?  Just database collections?  Should there be some sort of table for different measurements instead of paragraph-long text-based descriptions?
briardew (talk) 15:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope, additional entries