Talk:The Walking Drum

message: I think I have now done just about all I can for this article.  It is _much_ better than when I found it, but it needs some finishing touches.
The plot summary now should have most of the information it needs, although some fine tuning may be in order.
The character list, although not quite exhaustive, is pretty well good enough, I think.  Everyone with notable plot significance is listed unless I am mistaken.  The list mostly goes in the order in which the characters appear, with the notable exception of Jean Kerbouchard who is important from the beginning although he does not appear until rather late in the novel; I listed him near the beginning.
More information about the literary significance of the book would be good, and maybe some comments from a fan of the author's westerns, about how this book fits (or doesn't) with his other work.  (As for me, I could never make myself read westerns.)
Regarding the philosophical content of the novel, I need another couple sets of eyes.  I tried to be objective and portray only what was clearly present in the book, but as an Anabaptist my perception could potentially be POV, or certainly could be construed that way.  I'd like to have a Roman Catholic or a Protestant who has read the novel look at it, as well as an unbeliever who has read the novel and, if possible, an Arab or an Iranian who has read the novel.  (How do we find such a person?)
--Jonadab the Unsightly One, 2006 Sep 06
:Having read the book, I can only say that the relative state of Christian Europe and Moorish Spain is accurately portrayed in the book.  It qualifies more as a historical perspective than a philosophical one.  As to the cosmopolitan tendencies of a Druid, I am unqualified to speculate.  Emphasis in Lamour's writing is always placed on 'rugged individualism.'  Medieval Christians were hardly enlightened, and receive much worse treatment in Harry Harrison's "The Hammer and the Cross." Ron 01:00, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As it stands now the section on "Philosophy" can probably be considered original research (WP:OR) since it is not referenced. I have tagged it, I don't necessarily know if the conclusions are accurate having not read the book as of yet, but the material either needs to be fixed or removed.Awotter (talk) 01:03, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Should be noted somewhere that this was intended to be the first volume of a trilogy - which LL did not complete before his death. Believe the 2nd volume was to center on Persia and India, the 3rd on China... 2403:7800:B551:7100:5DCE:291F:AADE:2E1E (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: :Image:LouisL'amour TheWalkingDrum.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:LouisL'amour TheWalkingDrum.jpg