lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Royal Salute (anthem)

message: The transliteration is completely wrong. Though the IPA is correct. But I'm not in the mood to change it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.226.162.15 (talk) 09:51, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  transliteration 

message: The article's name is miss leading. No one will search for this article by "Salamatih Shah". Eventhough it may glorofy Shah, it was national anthem. I suggest that article renamed to "Persia National Anthem". --Mahanchian 19:53, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The name is misleading (actually the anthem doesn't even mention Shah). Perhaps it's better if we use the title "First Iranian national anthem" or "Nam-e Javid-e Vatan".  Bidabadi 01:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

text: The current "poem" for the anthem was re-written I believe, and that hences the new name given to it. --Rayis 12:54, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Does anybody know what the actual (Qajar-era) lyrics looked like? Shervink 13:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article's name 

message: The translation isn't that great. RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 00:53, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better translation of lyrics needed
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Jacrosse

message: : This comment was removed from Jacrosse's statement on the case page.
*I, for one, suggested some time ago that you read Wikipedia:No original research. I find it disappointing that you still haven't done so and seem to see no need to familiarise yourself with wikipedia policy despite being asked to do so several times.Homey 16:22, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for investigation/Archives/2006/04

message: *  -- Seems to add his advertisement to absolutely _anything_ Guns N Roses related. Too much for me to handle, sorry. // JoachimK 23:07, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anon user at 66.228.245.85 had a similar pattern before being blocked as a vandal. Amcfreely 03:35, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it possible to verify the information either way? Petros471 19:20, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unregistered users
Talk:Canoe (disambiguation)

message: I really think that this article needs citations. The conclusions are strange, and the described usage does not agree with what I have encountered. Mossig (talk) 23:30, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I made an edit to the article that attempted to address what I see as the common ambiguity.
I also noted that the article was very "North America uses this definition and everyone else is wrong" overtone to the article and so attempted to remove the bias. I made an assumption that the split is, as usual, between USA & Canada, and the other English speaking countries - a split that is probably likely due to the English (as in England's) usage being spread through, what was, the British Empire (Canada being a likely exception due to its proximity to the USA).
I also tried to address the inconsistent capitalisation of names of canoe. I saw the capitalisation as unnecessary and so de-capitalised them, but that might have been the wrong choice.
I since note that the real difference between the two types of canoe(BrE) are not in whether or not they have an open or closed top, but in the number of blades on the paddle used to power them. Note that, today, in competition, both types can be either closed or open top - it more depends on whether you want/need to keep water out than the type of vehicle. In flat-water racing, for example, the need to keep the water out is not a high as for white-water racing, and so some opt not to use a cover. See in article on Canoeing the image labelled "Flat-water K4 racing".
As to which is 'correct', I attemped to see what the IOC and ICF use. I looked this up several years ago on the IOC web site, and I recall it used the BrE usage, but looking it up now shows the AmE usage. However, it is worth noting that the 'International Canoe Federation' covers both types of vehicle, yet its name would seem to favour the BrE definition, and yet the contents of its web site seem to refer to use 'canoe' to refer the the 'Canadian canoe', favouring the AmE definition. Nicely mixed, I guess.
Davidmaxwaterman (talk) 03:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  North American bias 

message: * Pirogue, like a canoe but flat-bottomed and can be paddled or punted
* Outrigger canoe, a seagoing boat with one or more outriggers
* Waka (canoe), a type of Māori watercraft
should somehow be merged into canoe as these are just type of canoes and not a matter of disambiguation.
And kayak needs to be expanded, possibly like this:
* Kayak, referred to as canoe in the early 1900s and still in the United Kingdom (and as a concept in other European countries such as Austria, Germany, Switzerland, Poland, Sweden and the Netherlands).
 Kanoniem (talk) 08:06, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[canoe]]
Talk:Title VIII of the Patriot Act

message: I'm starting this title by going through each section and briefly summarizing them. After I'm through giving terse summaries for all of the sections, I'll be giving more information (background, etc.). Blackcap (talk) 20:00, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The beginning
Talk:Florida State Road 52

message: Sorry for the tag, folks, but one sentence does not a Wikipedia article make.  What else can be stated about SR 52? B.Wind 20:05, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

message: The reason given for the the cleanup tag is that the text portion of the article is "too short"; this use of the cleanup tag seems inappropriate as the article is already marked as a stub. Doonhamer 02:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed cleanup tag

message: There are currently four references for this article. What else will it take to get the existing reference tag removed? ----DanTD (talk) 15:13, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference tag 
Talk:The Ballad of Eskimo Nell

message: Hello, my name is John Mehlberg.  Although I did not start this article, I have a great interest in it because I am a folklorist intersted in drinking songs, toasts and recitations.  Eskimo Nell is the later.  
If you know a version of Eskimo Nell, please feel free to email me at CONTACT at IMMORTALIA.COM or by visiting my user page and dropping me a note.
John Mehlberg 20:17, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The poem shares the same structure and meter as one of Robert Service's famous Yukon poem, 'The Cremation of Sam McGee'.
:Yes, it seems to partially parody it... AnonMoos 15:19, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Service's metre 

message: The cited source for this claim makes no argument as to why this ballad is an example of so-called sex-hate literature, whatever that is (the term appears to be undefined). Rather, it merely labels the ballad a "sex hate recitation" on numerous occasions. I would argue that the poem is nothing of the sort, and probably more accurately echoes the sexual-liberation-of-women argument put forth by Germaine Greer and various feminists. In the absence of a reliable source explaining why Eskimo Nell is "sex-hate", I am deleting the reference.--ABVS 10:07, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair call, I actually decided to leave the link in there after writing in talk, because as you say the sentiments of the poem speak for themselves, and any reader can decide for themselves that the "sex hate" proposition is bollocks. (this is in contrast to at least one version of the "Lil the whore" poem in America which is allegedly similar, but in which Lil is most certainly the victim of "sex hate")--ABVS 13:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sex hate??

message: While I am all in favor of any constructive edits to this page (the subject itself seems to fluctuate at the best of times), recent edits made by Kondikenell are of such a nature as to violate WP:conflict of interest. The links added to the page and the addition and change of many example lines of the poem are almost unrelated to the subject matter: for one, they relate to a different poem, a so-called "new and expanded" Eskimo Nell. If this new version is so notable as to "replace" the traditional Ballad of Eskimo Nell, then it should have a page unto itself. If it is not notable enough to warrant a dedicated page, then let it not replace the version of Nell represented on in this article. ABVS1936 (talk) 17:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The website http://www.authorsonline.co.uk/ is a self-publishing service - see WP:SPS for why these sources are (usually) inappropriate. The website htpp://klondikenell.com is not independent of the subject (thus failing WP:RS). This should stay out until such time as the new version is reported in reliable sources, and if that happens, it may warrant a small addition, but eschewing the promotional language of the contentious edits. --Yeti Hunter (talk) 00:26, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revised Eskimo Nell/"Klondike" Nell
Talk:Wols

message: This reads like a disambiguation page...  Amalas 20:21, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The web forum stuff wasn't worthy of inclusion IMO, so I have removed it and the need to disambiguate. Kusma (討論) 01:28, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Two historically significant artworks (dated 1946-47 and 1947) have just been added for informational purposes. The inclusion of the 1947 work, It's All Over The City, should add significantly to the article because it exemplifies an important topic that should be included in this article: Wols' oil painting technique of the late 1940s (the "dripping" which resulted from the dripping of paint on the canvas), is related to the technique of Jackson Pollock of the same period. Coldcreation (talk) 00:01, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two paintings 

message: Those two links are both dead.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.189.34.4 (talk) 18:56, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links of Example Paintings
Talk:Soft soap

message: I seem to remember Softsoap being a Big Thing when it was first released.  If nothing else, it seemed to usher in the flood of liquid hand and body soap products that exist today.  I'd like to expand on this a little more sometime, but I'm not quite ready to expand on the stub that the Colgate-Palmolive article links to.  Until then, I think the Billy Joel note will have to suffice. --Mdwyer 20:23, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that was quick... --Mdwyer 01:16, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split off [[Softsoap]] 

message: Examples of soft soap propaganda 2001:4450:471F:300:3068:5DEA:E5A9:30D5 (talk) 05:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Newtown, Bucks County, Pennsylvania

message: I live in Newtown, and it is a township as well as a borough.
:The township is in Newtown Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania.  Perhaps there should be a clearer link?
:63.164.202.130 22:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a big difference between living in Newtown Township and Newtown Borough. If you live in the borough, then you also live in the township, but most people who live in the township do not live in the borough. The borough is a very small portion of land within the township. Perhaps this article should be titled "Newtown Borough, Bucks County, Pennsylvania"? The one for the township is titled correctly, but this one is a little ambiguous.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.191.241.47 (talk) 13:23, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Township as well 
Talk:Cervical vertebrae

message: I've added this category to hold the previously unattributed and uncategorized comments on this talk page.  The text below (preceding the next header) was present on the original page. James A. Stewart 23:48, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previously uncategorized comments 

message: There has been recurrent vandalism of this page by 24.35.76.223.  I've reverted it again, but the page may need to be locked. James A. Stewart 00:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent vandalism 

message: I'm looking at netters right now, and the landmarks specified in the wiki page are either a) wrong, or b) badly defined (how do you define the "level" of the vertabrae? is it at the middle of the body of the vertebrae? Using this definition, C4 is at the hyoid).  Could someone please look this over.  You can find the image here:  
http://www.netterimages.com/image/569.htm
--68.195.89.254 (talk) 05:11, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Landmarks are ill-defined 

message: I've noticed some edit warring in the history that happened on 29 December between Dschslava and 49.197.133.232. However, it's stopped now (possibly due to the 3RR?). Hdjensofjfnen (Is something wrong?) 22:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring? 

message: Too less content in current form , to even be a stub. Will be good to either expand it here or better , make it a section of the main article Devopam (talk) 13:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Cervical degenerative changes and grading]] 

message: About symptoms and none surgical 
treatments 102.222.234.181 (talk) 00:13, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cervical spine
Talk:Florida State Road 105

message: Sorry about the tag, folks - but one sentence does not a Wikipedia article make.  What more can be said about SR 105? B.Wind 20:28, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe a related routes chapter? There's a county suffixed route in Nassau County, Florida. ----DanTD (talk) 23:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Snitterfield

message: This is my first attempt at an article.  Please feel free to edit ruthlessly.  GollyG 20:30, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I have deleted the last two posts by an unregistered editor who repeatedly adds that the fire at the Foxhunter was unexpected. My reasons for the deletion are as follows, all fires in property are by their very nature unexpected therefore the addition of the word unexpected, is it seems to me, to suggest that either the fire was a result of arson, criminal damage or was part of an insurance fraud or had another alterior motive. An encyclopaedia is not the forum to enter into such speculation and if there are further details to be added to the events of the fire then let them be added with the source of the citation quoted, not as a result of speculation or wild village gossip.(Argrogan (talk) 07:11, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire at the Foxhunter 
Talk:Samuel Mazzuchelli

message: While I was doing a major rewrite of the entry, I made the mistake of moving its title in the middle of the process, to reflect the correct historical name by which Mazzuchelli is known in the sources. Unfortunately, this resulted in two separate entries. I would ask that the contents of the other entry be merged to replace the contents of this article. Daniel the Monk (talk) 17:45, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's obvious these two articles are about the same person, so no need to seek opinions on merging. Just do it. Here's how. 32.218.39.63 (talk) 21:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Trial (grammatical number)

message: Am I right in guessing that it's extremely rare?  Do any languages have quadruple (or higher?) number?--Colin. 4/11/06. 70.59.142.151 23:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Seems exotic, rare

message: I am proposing a merger of plural, nullar, trial (grammatical number), paucal, collective noun and singulative with grammatical number. Here are my reasons:
* Most of those other entries have very little in them. They could easily become sections, or even paragraphs in 'grammatical number';
* One exception is the plural entry, which does contain quite a bit, but a lot of what it has could just as well be in a general entry about 'grammatical number'; 
* I think that some of what is currently in the plural article might be used to improve the quality of the 'grammatical number' article;
A related page which is probably best left separate is the one on the dual number, which seems too large to merge with 'grammatical number'. FilipeS 14:40, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Anju

message: Does Anju truly meet all of the guidelines set at notability? I believe that this article should be merged with The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask characters, and will wait three days for a response. —Eternal Equinox | talk 20:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have decided that I am going to attempt to expand on this article instead merging it with the article in question above. Should anybody be interested, please join in. —Eternal Equinox | talk 14:04, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Talk:Volvox Turbo

message: This is still for sale at foetus.org, 6 years after its release. Either it's selling reeeallly slowly, or it's not very limited! Vans74 (talk) 21:49, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limited Edition? 
Talk:Cainites

message: "One of their apocryphal texts was the Gospel of Judas." - Isn't the text considered apcrypha from the viewpoint of mainstream Christianity, but the Cainites themselves would not have viewed it that way as this sentence implies? Шизомби 20:50, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would doubt that there is scientific or theological support for that.... Шизомби 01:13, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Apocrypha

message: The last paragraph of this section really throws me, especially the last sentence:
There is no doubt [Kind of risky statement - it is hard to prove a negative about what people might doubt.  Perhaps this is meant to say there is no disagreement in the known sources...] that they applauded the action of Judas in the betrayal, but our[?] authorities differ as to the motive which prompted him. The view that Judas through his more perfect Gnosis penetrated the wish[?] of Jesus more successfully than the others, and accomplished it by bringing him to the Cross through which he effected redemption, is intrinsically the more probable. [Really, why?  Does Wikipedia know all the intrinsically probable answers to questions of ancient esoteric dogma?]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.189.45.103 (talk) 04:41, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is copied verbatim from the PD sources listed at the bottom of the page, which seemed preferable to the mangled paragraph that was there before. Feel free to change this into NPOV as you see fit; you will not hurt anyone's feelings. Kramden (talk) 05:07, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judas
Talk:Nuevo San Juan Parangaricutiro

message: Does anyone know the English translation of Parangaricutirimícuaro from Náhuatl?  Of course, I’m assuming it’s a Náhuatl word, it might be Zapoteco, Purhépecha or something else. Jaksmata 20:50, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: yes 151.237.233.162 (talk) 16:48, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Ian Hornak

message: The same article as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hornak_ian
Tagged as needing citations/footnotes.  Also needs to read less like a resume or advertising.  Tychocat 10:00, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could use a good copyediting, as well as removal of "critics' statements" section, unabashedly blurb-like and not encyclopedic. 99.149.87.132 (talk) 00:00, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edits

message: This hyper-inflated list is not OK. There is general agreement across the board that lists of publications about a subject should not be included in an article--it's bad article writing and all too often promotional. Imagine such a list in the Rembrandt article. No, if there's anything worthwhile in those articles, they should be brought in as references, properly footnoted. Something similar applies to the list of holdings. First of all, much of it is unverified. Second, what there is is PRIMARY at best. Third, and related to the sourcing, why is it important? If the man is such an important artist the (verified) text should bear that out--not a lengthy list worthy only of a resume. Drmies (talk) 15:06, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Selected" bibliography 

message: Eric Ian Hornak Spoutz, who claims to be the nephew of Hornak, has been arrested by the FBI on charges of forgery. His claims of connection to Hornak have not clearly been substantiated as factual, and any references based on what he said or wrote should be reevaluated. The Detroit News was not able to get a response from the Hornak foundation as to whether Spoutz is connected with them at all. See here http://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/macomb-county/2016/02/04/feds-charge-macomb-dealer-forged-art-case/79852792/ John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged nephew alleged as forger
Talk:Kahuzi-Biéga National Park

message: the person who wrote this article is completely wrong, he is actually referring to the Parc National des Virunga, not Kahuzi-Biega. therefore this article is completely inaccurate and should be either modified or deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.241.1.171 (talk) 11:36, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://badsciencewikipedia.wordpress.com/2013/11/15/so-what-if-the-prose-is-bad/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  AfadsBad (talk) 19:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: this should be addressed https://minorityrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/MRG_InvRep_DRC_EN_Apr22v3_1.pdf 169.233.217.78 (talk) 07:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  human rights abuses
Talk:Earl of Lincoln

message: Is it appropriate to describe a place in Australia as the "family seat" of an English earl? Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that the Earls of Lincoln no longer have a traditional family seat, but that the earl lives in that place in Australia? john k 20:57, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think making such a distinction is appropriate. Mackensen (talk) 22:10, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone know what the traditional family seat of the Earls of Lincoln and Dukes of Newcastle was? john k 04:16, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Clumber Park? Choess 05:18, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please note this is linked to John Winthrop . Aatomic1 17:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Earls of Lincoln, Ninth Creation (1572)

message: "It was created for a second time by King Stephen sometime between 1143 and 1155 for William de Roumare. However, on his death in 1155 the title reverted to the crown. Stephen again created the title in 1147 for Gilbert de Gant, but on his death in 1156 it reverted to the crown"
Is this correct? Between 1147 and 1155 there were two different earls of Lincoln simultaneosly?
Bradomín (talk) 16:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Two at a time?

message: ODNB say John de Lacy was "created an earl". CP says John de Lacy was the first earl of the fourth creation. Thus making Edmund de Lacy second earl, not third. DrKay (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious