lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Blasphemy

message: Why Islam is the only religion encompassing with blasphemy in this article? Blasphemy is only associated with Islam according to the West theory. Wikipedia then accept the West claim and doing in the First World perspective. That is because of they [Western] once have counted as "benefactor" in influence and they are "really good Christian". Secondly, why they correlate blasphemy with atheism that I saw in Atheism section? According to them, insult is fundamental to atheist and freeing oneself from stress by being offensive toward any "tyranny religion". This is regarded as the West preparing to bring cultural Marxism in this planet. The Supermind (talk) 18:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  One sided bias 

message: * https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2023-05-01/blasphemy-religion-law-pakistan-execution
* https://www.thejakartapost.com/indonesia/2023/04/25/agriculture-ministry-examine-pigs-in-batam-following-swine-fever-virus-findings.html
 Bookku    (talk) 12:20, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs 

message: Following part of definition in  WP:WIKIVOICE sounds like providing legitimacy  to contention that 'Blasphemy is a crime', effectively reimposing and naturalizing notion and Wikipedia's support to the same. 
    
 
IMO this needs some rephrasing or adding according to whom.  Bookku    (talk) 12:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That text is the result of some rather dramatic, undiscussed changes made last December. I agree that it's inappropriate, and have reverted the article to the wording that was there previously. HiLo48 (talk) 00:58, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition in Wikivoice?  

message: According to the Holy Bible (King James Version, NKJV, NIV, etc..) the bible openly states only 2 ways to commit blasphemy against God.
 
1)     Making yourself equal to God (John 10:33); see also Isaiah 46:9-11.
2)     Claiming to forgive the sins of others. (Mark 2:7, Luke 5:21)
a.      All of us, everyone is a sinner (Romans 3:10-12 and 3:23, Psalm 53:1-3). It is impossible for any man, being a sinner, to forgive the sins of others.  Any claim to do so is blasphemy.  It is a usurpation of Gods’ authority.  Only God Himself, being perfect and without sin, has the power and authority to forgive sins.
Insulting religion or showing disrespect to God is not true biblical blasphemy.  It is an unfortunate side-effect of our own sinful nature. However, if you were to present yourself to God (in prayer for example), asking Him directly (God is omnipresent, Colossians 1:17) for forgiveness of such sins as these, He is the only one on Earth who has the power and authority to truly forgive your sins (1 John 1-9, Proverbs 28:13 96.18.17.211 (talk) 01:23, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed correction to the term "Blasphemy"
Talk:Chinchilla

message: "Their use for fur led to the extinction of one species": I can't find any evidence to support this statement. No third species is listed anywhere alongside C. chinchilla (= C. brevicaudata) and C. lanigera. Myopic Bookworm (talk) 10:55, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extinction? 

message: The map displaying the supposed distribution of wild chinchilla contradicts the text in the introduction. References relating to the natural geographic distribution are required. 69.143.146.97 (talk) 18:40, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural habitat and distribution
Talk:Bad Radio

message: This site seems to have the best info on Bad Radio and can be added as an external link.  I think I still have my ticket stubs so I'm going to try to find them and scan them in for upload to this page. --Viriditas 08:46, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I found it.  It's actually not a ticket stub.  It's a guest pass. It should be uploaded tonight or tomorrow.  Can you believe I still have this thing??  --Viriditas 03:07, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities/Names issues

message: I made some alterations to the text, which in effect put emphasis on a wider scope than Russia/Poland/Germany. I am aware of the fact that I didn't propose the change here first, but I remain in the hope that all or most of it will be seen as uncontroversial. /Tuomas 08:05, 12 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry I'm weak on areas east of central Poland, does this list include things like St. Petersburg? Bwood 04:44, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: References in other articles are a separate issue, but one that we can consider while we're all gathered. Bwood 04:44, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: Agree, some kind of clue that prevents newcomers from editing the standard out of ignorance is definately a good idea. Bwood 04:44, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope 

message: Did I miss any other hot spots? Halibutt 08:58, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
:Sorry I'm weak on areas east of central Poland, does this list include things like St. Petersburg? Bwood 04:44, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: References in other articles are a separate issue, but one that we can consider while we're all gathered. Bwood 04:44, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: Agree, some kind of clue that prevents newcomers from editing the standard out of ignorance is definately a good idea. Bwood 04:44, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  By modern states 

message: : Too early to tackle this point... Bwood 04:48, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  6: How should the standard wording be formatted?
Talk:George Rodocanachi

message: *This appears to be partially copyvio (ie. not totally) from http://www.christopherlong.co.uk/per.rodocanachigeorge.html. I took a liberty of listing it as one - Skysmith 09:05, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewritten - Skysmith 10:35, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ilya Frank

message: I am adding text from http://www.nobel-winners.com/Physics/ilya_mikhaylovich_frank.html
According to the disclaimer on the bottom of the page all text from this site is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License:
: All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. Timeline of Nobel Prize Winners is not affiliated with The Nobel Foundation. A Special Thanks to the 3w-hosting.com for helping make this site a success. External sites are not endorsed or supported by http://www.nobel-winners.com/  Copyright © 2003 All Rights Reserved.
--Gene s 09:08, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:UK Roundabout 8 Cars.gif

message: Apparently it's one of the very few animations here on wikipedia. Good job! Halibutt 09:13, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
This is one of the funniest things I have ever seen.  I don't know why, but when I saw this I couldn't stop laughing.  --NoPetrol 01:32, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: That page does not say that you cannot release GIFs under their license - it only says that they (i.e. the FSF itself) won't use it because they feel it puts them at risk. --Random832T 19:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

text: huh.  it only does it when i view this page.  not the article.  probably just a firefox bug. - Omegatron 04:31, Dec 19, 2004 (UTC)
Is it just me, or do the cars look suspiciously similar to the ones featured in Grand Theft Auto 2? Ppk01 21:59, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I drew the cars myself. I haven't even played GTA(2). Fredrik Johansson 07:21, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Yep, it's GTA. 60.48.231.194 (talk) 17:29, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

text: I assumed it was for illustrating U-turns. theProject 04:13, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

text: yeah, plenty of people just don't indicate at roundabouts, I've seen people come off them whilst still indicating right, there would be crashes if you always relied on how people were indicating to judge when to set off. Starguitar 17:37, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

text: that may be true, but surely the image is to demonstrate how a roundabout should be used, and not how people actually treat it. one problem i have with the image is that when exiting a roundabout you should always exit into the left most lane, unless you are in a filter lane, at least, you should in the UK, yet some of the cars in this image exit in the same lane they entered. 2.96.112.4 (talk) 01:47, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Various comments
Talk:Swanscombe

message: In this section, (see Revision as of 14:45, 2 July 2007) the gender of the child mentioned was changed, from daughter to son.  This was changed by an anonymous contributor, and may have been misinformation. Can anyone confirm by reference to the quoted source?  regards, Lynbarn (talk) 08:03, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: World War 2

message: Lower Thames Crossing mentions Swanscombe as an option.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by John a s (talk • contribs) 18:03, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Option for Lower Thames Crossing 
Talk:Tactical frivolity

message: september 26 what year??
:If you're referring to the anti-World Bank/IMF protests in Prague, the year was 2000. Regards,  Skomorokh  12:14, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Year

message: I was surprised to see no mention of Wavy Gravy. I believe he used and popularized tactical frivolity (although he didn't call it that) at events like Vietnam War protests, as described in the documentary Saint Misbehavin'. --66.201.47.2 (talk) 03:11, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for this, looks a most interesting character, I added him to the see also section for now. FeydHuxtable (talk) 15:25, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wavy Gravy 

message: There is an Icelandic saga, The Tale of Halli the Sarcastic, in which the titular bard successfully agitates for a change in the policy of the court at which he finds himself employed by eating his stew very rapidly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.8.27.140 (talk) 19:47, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Tale of Halli the Sarcastic 

message: As a thumbnail where we can't read the banner, :File:Clandestine Insurgent Rebel Clown Army.jpg looks like a regular crowd standing around at any old protest or festival. Even full size you can only see a few funny wigs and a feather boa in this shot. Isn't :File:Clown Army (6029797786).jpg clearer, for depicting what the article is about? Or could we use some other photo of CIRCA? --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:11, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Bah!  I was hoping you wouldn't notice or wouldn't bother to argue.  The points you make are of course correct.  I have other reasons for prefering my original pic & caption   (e.g. CIRCA is specifically described in sources as practicing tactical frivolity, whereas I'm not sure about those Scandinavian clowns.) But have just noticed another situation that needs attention, so don't have time to list all my reasons. Happy to concede this to someone who at least is following policy is a civial manner :-) FeydHuxtable (talk) 16:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The Scandinavian clowns are blocking a road at an anti-war protest, checking the source album on Flickr, so I think they're okay for the article. (They're listed in the CIRCA category on commons but I can't find any clues that they're formally part of the group.) Agree that a clear CIRCA picture would be better, but I think this captures the mood best from what we've got. --Lord Belbury (talk) 16:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening photo
Talk:Statistical parametric mapping

message: The update on 12:22, 8 Sep 2004 was committed by me, but the credit for the corrections goes to Professor Karl Friston, who kindly replied to a request for comments and corrections. - Vaughan 11:27, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: I'm only vaguely familar with stereotactic coordinates, but I thought the coordinate system was attributed to both J. Talairach and P. Tournoux. The link to an as yet uncreated wiki links only to Talairach. If this is the case, I'll add an entry based on the paper "J. Talairach and P. Tournoux, "Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System - an Approach to Cerebral Imaging", Thieme Medical Publishers, New York, NY, 1988" Jddriessen 20:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  J. Talairach and P. Tournoux 

message: The article describes its uses without describing how it works. Needs more. Lfstevens (talk) 07:25, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is it?
Talk:The Parallax View

message: "but finds himself seriously outclassed and isolated by the subtle and invasive corporation. He can sense the fate the corporation intends for him but cannot avoid it."
This seems a little presumptuous.
Figureground 06:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation 

message: Have you seen the picture?  It's also in the IMDb, which I assuredly did NOT write!  It's Jim Davis!  He's the Senator shot at the Space Needle; why you "disgree" with this is beyond me.  (BTW, Lee Marvin gets shot in The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance).
Rlquall 12:19, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I've seen it, which is why I removed the link to Davis; see my note below. MisfitToys 10:11, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC)
---
Hi, MisfitToys.
Are you sure Jim Davis didn't play Senator John Hammond? I don't have the DVD to hand, but Google the IMDb, and MisfitToys :-) seem to think he did.
chocolateboy 18:26, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: The article suggested he played the senator assassinated in Seattle; that character is Senator Carroll. Davis' character - Sen. Hammond - only appears later in the film. (Saying much else regarding his role would be something of a spoiler.) MisfitToys 10:09, Sep 10, 2004 (UTC)
This whole article is one big spoiler, so I don't feel that any more harm can be done to it by naming who gets killed and when. The revelation of Frady's demise and how it comes about pretty much makes this whole effort quite capable of ruining the enjoyment of this movie to anyone who hasn't seen it. Gspong 03:03, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jim Davis

message: At the very end of the credits there is information about the sources used in the "Parallax Test" sequence. A photography book titled Suburbia by Bill Owens is listed. There is an article here on the book, but without a copy of the book I haven't been able to pin down which photos were used in the film. An article on the Parallax Test by those with pertinent information would be most welcome. Entries in the "Trivia" section on who might have copied the idea for their music video are entirely worthless.Gspong 03:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Parallax Test
Talk:Struma (river)

message: Is it really proper to move this to Struma? Is there a regular English term for it? In my experience it is always Strymon, but that's mostly from reading references to it in the context of ancient Greece. (Google gets 594 results for "Strymon River" and 641 for "Struma River", by the way.) Adam Bishop 13:37, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I see 2,410 English pages for Strymon river and 2,480 English pages for Struma river on Google. I don't know offhand whether most of the river flows through Bulgaria, but it probably does and it seems that the native term is taking over the ancient one. (I dislike the practice of using " River" in article titles, but that's different.) --Joy [shallot] 03:18, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: Actually there're 218 results for Strymon river and 352 for Struma river. There're also 74 results for Strouma river. I think that if English hasn't got its own word for the river, the article should take the native name. Struma rises in Bulgaria, and the article should be Struma River. --webkid 08:21, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: See Talk:Struma#Naming.
You are missing a very important point here. Regardless if it is Struma or Strymon, the discharge of this river is way beyond 76 thousand cubic meters per second. For your information the discharge of Mississippi is a meager 13 thousand cubic meters per second. Please fix your numbers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.126.228.33 (talk) 16:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: I  just wanted  to  ask  if  anyone can  find  a  better  map. I  clicked  on  the  map,  but  I  still could  make  no sense  of  it.  Maybe  my  eyes  are  getting  old,  but  even  with  my  glasses  on  this  map  was  not helpful  to  me.  Sorry  if  I  have  put  this  comment  in  the  wrong  place.  Wikipedia has  changed  itself  a  bit,  so  I  can  no  longer  comment  directly  on  the  talk  page.  Please!  Better map?  I  speak  not  as  an  editor  but  as a  user. 46.12.92.230 (talk) 21:47, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The river is highlighted (unusually) in red - at least this article has a map, unlike a lot of others--Jokulhlaup (talk) 16:32, 6 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Better map?
Talk:Collapse of the Soviet Union

message: We are at an edit war on redirecting to History of the Soviet Union (1985-1991) or to History of the Soviet Union (1985-1991)#Yeltsin and the dissolution of the USSR. Redirecting to the whole article on the time period 1985-1991 implies that the Soviet Union was deemed to collapse already in 1985, maybe earlier. I disagree with this view. See New Union Treaty. -- Petri Krohn 07:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was not deeemed. I agree. But various attempts to save it failed. There is a difference between the moment of dissolution and the whole process of gradual collapse. The Soviet collapse was not a momentary event, like 9/11. It was a painful, struggling process.  Hence the redirect to the corresponding period. `'mikka 16:28, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war: where to redirect? 

message: I have reverted the redirection of this talk page to Talk:Dissolution of the Soviet Union. This discussion is about a redirect, at present it only has historical relevance. There is however no reason to hide it with a redirect. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 23:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirecting talk pages? 
Talk:Mungyeong

message: I'm reluctant to enter information on this here because it is not offically a project as yet.  However, if it does happen, it will drastically affect this town.  I'm not sure how to fit it in though:  Geography, Tourism, Transportation, Economics, etc.  
Please advise.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaronDierkes (talk • contribs) 03:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: i suggest mentioning it as a proposed project that may have a large economic impact on this town from increased transportation and tourism (or something like that). it's one of the new south korean president's top priorities, so it's more than just idle speculation. it seems like a giant version of his Cheonggyecheon project when he was mayor of seoul. ~~  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.76.15.52 (talk) 14:39, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Grand Korean Waterway]]
Talk:Cheongdo County

message: Great additions to the article Steeniejung! My one recommendation would be to also talk about winter and other seasons in the climate and weather section.
-Hulu92 (talk) 04:19, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review
Talk:Boryeong

message: *Conditional support - plainly these two identical articles, though well intentioned, should never have been created. Obviously we just need the Boryeong page. However, the entire content of the new articles is unsourced/OR and we have no way of knowing how accurate it all is or, indeed, if it might be copyvio. Consequently any content merge should only be of that content that can be souced. Failing that I would suggest just converting them to redirects. BlueValour (talk) 01:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge in of [[Daecheon Beach]] and [[Daecheon]]
Talk:Distinct society

message: In the phrase "...used in Quebec and Canada", Quebec is redundant because Quebec is a part of Canada.  A naive reader may not recognize the redundancy and infer that Quebec is not a part of Canada, which is counterfactual.  Leaving the article as it is impairs clarity by subtly sanctioning this implication.  Therefore, the phrase has to be changed either to "...used in Canada" (my preference, since I believe saying something in as few words as possible is usually best for clarity) or something like "...used in Quebec and the rest of Canada".  I'll let some other editor make the change, because I have already made the change once, and I do not participate in edit wars.--Indefatigable 14:28, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: How does it look now? Adam Bishop 14:34, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: Get a reference saying it's a stronger term. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 23:18, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "One doesn't mean sovereignty. The other does — in the political sense of the word." Since interpretation is up for debate, I'd argue that nation compared to distinct society is a stronger statement. Lotheric 00:18, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

message: In the Origin paragraph, there is a statement that might lead a reader to think that Quebec is Bilingual, which is not the case.  While the Federal Government is, (or, more accurately, it offers all its services in French and English) the Province of Quebec is not.  Quebec *ONLY* official language is French.  In fact, New Brunswick is the only Province that is Bilingual using English and French.  I will make changes reflecting this unless anyone wishes to discuss it..? Dphilp75 (talk) 19:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that section is referring to how English can be used in the National Assembly. 24.64.168.161 (talk) 04:28, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You could well be correct, but as written, it leaves the impression that Quebec is Bilingual, which simply isn't the case...  Dphilp75 (talk) 17:50, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin 
Talk:Bukjeju County

message: I have just removed two, contradictory, sets of coordinates from the article:
* 
* 
which, if either, is correct? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 
Talk:Tongyeong

message: I think a citation is not needed regarding chungmul halmae kimbap because it is common knowledge.  It's sort of like asking someone to give a citation that Obama is the President of the United States, or a citation that the sky is blue.
Mattvsmith (talk) 23:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

message: "Park Kyung-ni was a really famous novelist, who wrote the most well-known novel, Toji (토지, The Land) consisting of 16-volume story, in Korea." 
Isn't this sentence a little bit confusing? Sorciopeloso (talk) 04:16, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Park Kyung-ni 