Talk:Five Tathāgatas

message: Yes, please merge, as it refers to the same concept. I suppose a redirect would be in place here. rudy 11:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled comment

message: I have removed references to the so-called "Twilight Language" that has been inserted here (and elsewhere; please see the discussion(s) on both the dab page's Talk:
and the page for the book referred to) until an explanation can be given (here on this talk page) as to  why it is relevant to _this particular_ article. -- Zero sharp (talk) 20:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Twilight Language" 

message: Is there some explanation or teaching about the meaning of the colors connected with those five groups of Buddhas? Nothing mentioned about this in this article.
:Austerlitz -- 88.72.8.68 (talk) 22:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Austerlitz -- 88.72.11.19 (talk) 21:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colors 

message: I embarrassingly and accidentally deleted the Sanskrit script in the chart that has the different names of the Dhyani Buddhas while I was adding in the Tibetan!!! I don't have the script in my computer so I cannot add them back in. My deepest regret and sincerest apologies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clodya (talk • contribs) 08:40, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.76.245 (talk) 18:05, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help! Accidentally Deleted Sanskrit Script Please Put Back! 

message: The term "Dhyani Buddhas"is not part of the Buddhist or Sanskritic mainstream; it's an nineteenth-century neologism. This can be readily checked in the corpus at dsbcproject.org.
Also see britannica.com which says "scholars in recent years have pointed out that the term Dhyani-Buddha does not appear in the original texts, but the nomenclature continues to be commonly used" and: religionfacts.com
says "Five Dhyani Buddhas" is a "term coined by B.H. Hodgson in the 19th century to describe the figures who appear in the Mandala of the Five Jinas ("eminent ones"). It is not a term used in any Buddhist literature, but has become a common term in the West" Chris Fynn  (talk) 00:06, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The term "Dhyani Buddhas"

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Five Dhyani Buddhas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090308030758/http://buddhism.kalachakranet.org/5_dhyani_buddhas.html to http://buddhism.kalachakranet.org/5_dhyani_buddhas.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Five Tathagatas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060212211306/http://www.padmaloka.org.uk/aloka.html to http://www.padmaloka.org.uk/aloka.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Consort of Ratnasambhava is listed as Mamaki but the reference for this, 8, says she is consort of Akshobya.  Different online resources give different and conflicting information about this.  Can we get accurate information and a reliable source on this matter, or else can we clarify why we have conflicting information, such as different traditions or whatever?  My own best reference is the online chinese buddhist encyclopedia which lists her only as Ratnasambhava's consort.  Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.252.126.176 (talk) 15:45, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consort Inaccuracy 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:51, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion