Talk:Mockingbird (Marvel Comics)

message: This page has absolutely nothing about Bobbi joining the Great Lakes Avengers. Can we get something about this? IronMan54 16:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GLA

message: I could have sworn her death was completely an accident. As in they were just running from Mephisto's fireballs and whammo, she got one in the back. Lots42 10:03, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's how I recall it.  Of course, that's hardly an accident!  Mephisto *was* trying to kill them, and just got a lucky shot in. BOZ 18:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her Death 

message: :Image:Mockingbird (Marvel Comics).jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 21:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Mockingbird (Marvel Comics).jpeg

message: I changed the sentence that said that "October 12th" was the date Mockingbird miscarried. Its is actually the date they guessed that their child would have been born. So I've added a couple sentences to reflect that. 74.12.144.178 00:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secret Invasion

message: I read Astonishing Tales #6 last night, and Bobbi Morse, Agent of S.H.I.E.L.D. was nowhere to be found. --Scottandrewhutchins (talk) 13:08, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First appearance

message: I added a partial bibliography and it was promptly deleted because it was "incomplete and unnecessary".  While I have to agree that it was incomplete, I think it would be extremely useful to both collectors and casual fans.Davelecave (talk) 20:10, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bibliography

message: "Whatever writer Gerry Conway’s original ideas were for this character, subsequent creators developed her to such a degree that she is unrecognisable as this earlier figure. In particular, no later story makes reference to any psychic abilities that these quotes might describe."
Gerry Conway's original ideas were dropped. Subsequent creators developed her to such a degree that she is unrecognisable as this earlier figure. And no later story makes reference to any psychic abilities. All of that is fact and can easily be seen by reading through the article and checking the other sources.Cebr1979 (talk) 22:38, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. If you have sources that explicitly states the "Gerry Conway's ideas were dropped" (implying a certain level of disrespect), or that the figure was "unrecognizable" as the original, then we are on solid, level ground. If not, its an evaluative statement, and not allowed (as per WP:OR). - Jack Sebastian (talk) 23:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we could change the wording from "dropped" to "not followed up on," if you like but, as for a "source..." we're not going to list every single appearance the character has made since in order to validate a fact (not original research) that the psychic abilities were never mentioned again by subsequent writers.Cebr1979 (talk) 23:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait... the word "dropped" isn't even used (which completely invalidates your argument since it now "implies" nothing).Cebr1979 (talk) 23:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mockingbird_%28Marvel_Comics%29&type=revision&diff=680130346&oldid=680063834 Not "an opinion"] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Mockingbird (Marvel Comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130927115401/http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=41551 to http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=41551
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://marvel.com/news/tv/24095/declassifying_marvels_agents_of_shield_aftershocks
*Corrected formatting/usage for https://variety.com/2015/tv/news/agents-of-shield-promotes-adrianne-palicki-to-series-regular-1201434285/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://collider.com/comic-con-marvel-tv-aka-jessica-jones-hulk-cloak-and-dagger/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/live-feed/adrianne-palicki-nick-blood-star-816692
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified