lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Empire (disambiguation)

message: Previously searching for 'the empire' took you straight to the entry "The Empire (Warhammer)." As far as I can tell, none of the other empires on this page are exclusively referred to as "the empire" - compare the other fictional empires, for example.
I suggest the change be reverted, to make it easier to locate aforesaid entry. CTwells 18:42, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the empire" redirects here 

message: I've added back some of the text from the merged empire computer games disambig. without this info, the games simply aren't disambiguated; I very much doubt someone looking for the game they played ten years ago called empire will have any idea if they played empire classic or classic empire, but they might recognize psl empire or "that game that was renamed to conquest". the confusion over the plato renaming has propagated to gaming history texts all over the net. I know it's a bit verbose for a disambig page, but I think it is necessary to do a good job. -- Akb4 19:26, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  computer games
Talk:Lone Fir Cemetery

message: * http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2013/06/vandals_topple_15-20_headstone.html
--Another Believer (Talk) 14:52, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: Picture lists Stephens as being the land "donor", though main article describes him as selling land to Colburn Barrell, when it was not even considered a cemetery.  Perhaps a more accurate description would be "original land owner"? 73.11.3.229 (talk) 06:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stephens the land "donor"? 
Talk:RMA

message: * reciprocal multi-agent system, see for example this doctoral thesis here: https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/12269878. Smthng to do with computing, which is all and complete gibberish to me so I'm not proposing any explanation whatsoever on the meaning of this RMA and therefore shall not attempt to include it in the page.
* About the "Research Master Archaeology program" and RMA thesis, see for example: 
** RMA thesis Archaeology second year, with this: 
** RMA thesis tutorial, or this as an example:
** RMA thesis Marieke Drost - Historical and comparative studies of the sciences and humanities - Utrecht University.
:But there's also this: Programme Book RMA Philosophy 2020-2021, for which I fail to see how the initials fit. It's supposed to be a "Research Master of Ancient, Medieval and Renaissance Studies", okay there's "Ancient" that fits the A but it still not complete. ?
I intended to add this to the "Education" section:
* Research Master Archaeology program, leading to an RMA thesis that supposedly contributes to a following doctorate thesis
but considering the last point I abstain and leave that here for my betters to sort it out. Pueblo89 (talk) 10:18, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  meanings not (yet) included
Talk:Amolops torrentis

message: I expanded this article to include the sections of description, habitat and distribution, conservation, phylogeny, mating, enemies, and physiology. I conducted a thorough search of all English language literature on the frog, but future editors may benefit from exploring Chinese language sources. Britneys99 (talk) 17:13, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by Eurquhart02 (talk) 23:23, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022

message: This is a very comprehensive overview of Amolops torrentis that included an abundance of detail. The structure of the article flows nicely and is congruent with the outline. The only structural change I made was dividing the mating section into two subsections (male calling and female preference). Throughout the article I corrected many run-on sentences that tried to include a lot of detail and felt a little overwhelming.  Froggo1324 (talk) 20:22, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review
Talk:Paal–Knorr synthesis

message: Furan Synthesis Mechanism - 3,4-diethyl-2,5-phenyl diones does not make sense.
Pyrrole Synthesis Mechanism - a proton must be lost after the amine adds to the protonated carbonyl.
Thiophene Synthesis Mechanism - how can treatment of 1,4-dicarbonyls with phosphorus pentoxide reveal anything about how thiophenes are made?
1,4-Diol-2-ynes - the conversion of a 1,4-diol-2-yne to the diketone should be irreversible.
Synthetic Applications - typo, there should be an apostrophe in Trosts.
This pyrrole was found to be unstable, and (delete such) was treated...to MAKE the protected...
Refluxing para-toluene sulfonic acid in benzene was found to deHYDRATE...
69.72.27.19 (talk) 06:32, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In order of asking...
#Changed to "3,4-disubstituted-2,5-hexane diones", after reading source.
#Comment: The image and text are consistent. That catalytic proton is added and removed in the first step; this is noted below the image.
#Comment: I'd agree that the sulphurisation of the 1,4 di-CO is skipped over, but that's what wikilinks are for! I'll add a few to point people in the right direction.
#Comment: Well, all catalysis is reversible, but in the end, neither scheme would end up in equilibrium. (I'd say entropy effects would be quite important here)
#Unchanged: The paper An Asymmetric Synthesis of the Tricyclic Core and a Formal Total Synthesis of Roseophilin via an Enyne Metathesis is published as being authored by Barry M. Trost and George A. Doherty.
#Changed to "...as such... to protect the pyrrole"
#Someone got there before me. 
Remember, you can edit this article any time. Yours, Tomásdearg92 (talk) 06:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  various problems
Talk:Baten Kaitos: Eternal Wings and the Lost Ocean Original Soundtrack

message: Didn't Toys R Us release a 8 track sample CD that came with the game, but only at TRU?--207.197.112.4 (talk) 19:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, from googling it. Can't find much info though. I'll add something on the page when I can. happypal (Talk | contribs) 07:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Yeah, that'd be pretty cool. I if you are unsure about what to do, you can just contact one of us, or just go right on ahead and write on the page. It's not as if you can do something wrong someone here can't correct. Thx.happypal (Talk | contribs) 05:44, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Fejervarya iskandari

message: If I understand correctly, irrigated land is that which is artificially irrigated.  How, therefore, is irrigated land the natural habitat of any animal? Chrisrus (talk) 04:11, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naturally Irrigated Habitat
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/List of Republics

message: === Comment by uninvolved Newyorkbrad ===
User:WHEELER is a consistently uncivil and tendentious editor with a lengthy history of disruption. Even a quick scan of his current talkpage unfolds an appalling display of abusive name-calling spewed in all directions. It appears that WHEELER has been carrying on with the same unacceptable pattern of behavior for years now, and frankly should have been dealt with much sooner. 
The question for the arbitrators to answer here is not whether WHEELER can be allowed to continue editing as he has been, but whether a full-fledged arbitration case is required to address this situation or whether a quicker resolution can be found. Newyorkbrad 01:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't previously aware of the prior ArbCom decision cited by SimonP, which appears not to have made its way into the list at  Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Completed requests. Given that there are no actionable remedies in the prior decision, I don't think this changes the analysis. Newyorkbrad 14:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Statement by uninvolved editor before the case opened

message: User:WHEELER is a consistently uncivil and tendentious editor with a lengthy history of disruption. Even a quick scan of his current talkpage unfolds an appalling display of abusive name-calling spewed in all directions. It appears that WHEELER has been carrying on with the same unacceptable pattern of behavior for years now, and frankly should have been dealt with much sooner. 
The question for the arbitrators to answer here is not whether WHEELER can be allowed to continue editing as he has been, but whether a full-fledged arbitration case is required to address this situation or whether a quicker resolution can be found. Newyorkbrad 01:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't previously aware of the prior ArbCom decision cited by SimonP, which appears not to have made its way into the list at  Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Completed requests. Given that there are no actionable remedies in the prior decision, I don't think this changes the analysis. Newyorkbrad 14:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment by uninvolved Newyorkbrad 

message: Somehow the arbitrator's opinions on the matter did not get included.  I would put them on, but I don't know if DM didn't include them for a reason or not. Kwsn(Ni!) 21:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uh..
Talk:First Baptist Church

message: (there was long Nrhpbot added list above, which i deleted -- Doncram)
Strongly Object to the above because not all of the churches in the article are  on the National Register. Not all churches with this name are on the National Register or even in the United States.clariosophic 21:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is First Baptist Church in Newton, (yes that is the church's official name) located in Newton, Massachusetts. It is on the National Register. See List of Registered Historic Places in Newton, Massachusetts under Newton Centre. clariosophic 21:57, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nrhp Review - Strongly object 

message: Could we maybe get some information about why churches are named "First Baptist Church?"  Brogandman (talk) 18:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Baptist Church" info 

message: Or is it a theological term of some sort? -- 92.229.254.130 (talk) 13:20, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does "first" simply mean "oldest"?
Talk:Kenneth Franklin

message: The facts presented here are up-to-date and accurate in all the main points.  However I have one correction to offer.
Upon his marriage to Charlotte Walton, they did not adopt--He legally adopted Charlotte's daughter by a previous marriage.
208.54.15.1 19:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahhhh, that is very possible (and judging from your name, even more so ).  I probably took a small liberty with the wording there and will fix it.  Thank you and please let me know if anything else looks suspect.  —Wknight94 (talk) 19:56, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Also, I am sorry for your recent loss.  —Wknight94 (talk) 20:06, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Data structure diagram

message: An article about diagrams ... with no diagrams? Kjdamrau 19:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a joke? 

message: A Bachman diagram contains rectangles to represent record types and arrows to represent set types (one to many relationships, with the arrow in the one-to-many direction. This diagram uses a line with a circle halfway along it, which is certainly not a Bachman notation. Mhkay (talk) 21:23, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: The Bachman diagram is incorrect
Talk:Dromomeron

message: What do you think?--Svetovid 19:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hard to say... It's not a dinosaur, just a dinosauromorph. Still, there are probably many more reptiles and amphibians than there are dinosaur articles, so it couldn't hurt us to support this article. Dunno how the others feel. Firsfron of Ronchester 20:41, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Well the article has been created and edited by members of the WPDino but folks from the WP Amphibians and Reptiles are welcome to contribute as well. Could be part of both projects or is there a problem with this? Archie is supported by both the WPDino and the WPBirds. ArthurWeasley 22:41, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a bad idea, for 'transitional' forms (technically within the scope of one project but important to another) to fall under multiple projects. Dinoguy2 01:49, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Dinosaurs or WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles?

message: Hello. I notice that the pages for Dromomeron and Tawa have been combined and the discussion of Dromomeron fossil material now incorporates anatomical data from specimens referred to Tawa. While I appreciate that Bennett (2015) has suggested the synonymy of the two taxa, I note that a large number of past works (e.g., Nesbitt et al., 2009; Alcober and Martinez, 2010; Brusatte et al., 2010; Langer et al., 2013) accept the taxonomic distinction. I would suggest reinstating the Tawa article with sections in both that article and the one on Dromomeron describing Bennett's new hypothesis. That way, both the broad consensus and the novel idea can be presented pending further studies. Unfortunately, I am not practiced enough in wiki-ing to accomplish this task, but I thought I would offer this suggestion.
Refs - 
Alcober OA, Martinez RN. 2010. Zookeys 63:55–81.
Bennett SC. 2015. Historical Biology 27:796–814.
Brusatte SL, Benton MJ, Desojo JB, Langer MC. 2010. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 8:3–47.
Langer MC, Nesbitt SJ, Bittencourt JS, Irmis RB. 2013. Geological Society of London, Special Pubs 379:157–186.
Nesbitt SJ, Irmis RB, Parker WG, Smith ND, Turner AH, Rowe T. 2009. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29:498–516.
--32.210.48.106 (talk) 21:59, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomic Hypotheses for Dromomeron and Tawa
Talk:Alan Hardaker

message: I have followed all known conventions in submitting this article. I do not own the article of course, but I would be appreciative if you would notify me here or here, explaining rationale if you carry out extensive modification, or indeed if you nominate it for deletion. Ref (chew)(do) 19:32, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pathetic Sharks

message: i noticed this article has been tagged for quality - i had a read - it seems terse and authoritative to me - what seems to be the problem with it?Fiaschetto 19:39, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

message: There was one sketch where the sketch was entitled something along the lines of "Terror on U-Boat 96", a German submarine. This turned out to be a Pathetic Sharks sketch and the German Submariners spoke in a Germanised English. The Pathetic Sharks infultrated the U-Boat by entering the torpedo hatches. The crew were petrified at first but once having seen that the Sharks were trying to get Neighbours on the radar screen, one German Officer proclaimed, "Diese Sharken sind nicht dangerhausen. Diese sind Krapenshite". The translation below being "These sharks are not dangerous, they are crap!"  LewisR (talk) 09:10, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Denglisch" Pathetic Sharks
Talk:SY Morning

message: I've tried to fill the infobox with Morning's specifications but I'm not familiar with all the various different terms so I may have made a mistake. Here's the description I was using, so someone else can correct things as necessary.
Her length is 140 feet, breadth 31½ feet, and depth 16½ feet. Her gross tonnage is
437, and her registered tonnage 297… The Morning altogether can carry 318 tons of coal besides her deck load, and 107 tons of provisions. She is barque-rigged, has a good auxiliary engine and two boilers, and can steam 8 knots. Her light draught is 15½ feet after and 12 feet forward; loaded, 19 feet after and 17 feet forward.
From  GalaxyHound 04:18, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Morning's specifications
Category talk:Finnish Lutherans

message: This is a useless category because huge majority of Finns are Lutherans, you could categorize any as Finnish Lutheran!  --Periegetes (talk) 19:45, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This category should only include people who have publicly self-identified as Lutherans (see WP:CATREL), so I added an explanation to the category page. --JAAqqO (talk) 00:57, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I did the same to the parent category :Category:Finnish Christians. --JAAqqO (talk) 01:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:S-bus

message: Can an admin delete the space between positions and <noinclude>?  That space is screwing up the template from working properly.  Thank you!–Whaleyland ( Talk • Contributions ) 19:41, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did that work? — Scientizzle 21:30, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it worked.  Thank you!–Whaleyland ( Talk • Contributions ) 04:25, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Please revert colour removal change for which consensus was neither sought or reached at the project's talk page. Bazj (talk) 11:43, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: this reversal has now been done. --Diannaa (Talk) 23:48, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Please revert undiscussed change

message: Please move colour to top border as per WT:SBS discussion.
Change
: background: 
to
: border-top: 5px solid
Thanks. Bazj (talk) 14:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This one is done. --Diannaa (Talk) 03:33, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move colour to top border as per [[WT:SBS]] discussion
Talk:Limnonectes tweediei

message: Andrew Smith (zoologist) died in 1872. So it is impossible that he creates this species in 1935! French user Givet. 86.199.94.227 (talk) 15:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is odd. Every online source seems to say "Limnonectes tweedliei (Smith, 1935)"; yet if track down the full citation, it is to "On a collection of reptiles and amphibians from Perak, Malay Peninsula" by Malcolm Arthur Smith, whose author citation is "M.A.Smith". Hesperian 11:51, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
Category talk:Swedish Lutherans

message: Is this category really necessary? Almost all Swedish are Lutherans, so... this is just a lame spin-off of the category "Swedes".
:It seems that this category was created by a non-European, so it explains. In the Nordic countries overwhelming majority of people are Lutherans, so this kind of categories are useless.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.186.253.132 (talk) 14:56, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Limnonectes

message: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/07/110727164711.htm 74.118.30.114 (talk) 18:22, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New research shows rapid evolution of fanged frog 

message: English 41.71.22.231 (talk) 15:28, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Limnonectes dabanus
Talk:Carissa macrocarpa

message: Where does it come from? What climate does it like? Can it make an invasive weed? Dysmorodrepanis 19:49, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Can someone confirm that this. Is the fruit also known as a mutton goola?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.146.237.104 (talk) 18:16, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mutton Goola 
Talk:Minervarya sahyadris

message: Recently this species is renamed to Fejervarya sahyadris. -B kimmel (talk) 13:37, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A citation is needed. The source currently used is Dubois, Ohler & Biju (2001), which according to the IUCN Red List is "A new genus and species of Ranidae (Amphibia, Anura) from south-western India" and gives its name as Minervarya sahyadris. Peter James (talk) 16:52, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: References are included. Whether this is Fejervarya or Minervarya is disputed. Micromesistius (talk) 17:28, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Madog Fychan

message: J. E. Lloyd, Owen Glendower: Owen Glyn Dŵr (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1931), describes in detail how Gruffydd ap Madog Crypl succeeded his father (whose lands had recently been in wardship) in 1304, aged about six.  This seems to leave no room for there to be a second Madog.  Accordingly this articel fails WP:V and should be deleted.  I would welcome comments from any one else watching this page before I nominate it for AFD.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:29, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Existence
Talk:Adaptations of A Christmas Carol

message: This page is stuffed with non-notable and unsourced material, and needs a good clean-up.  Many new unsourced things are being added right now, and those ought to be challenged and the editor asked to provide a source, rather than just being ignored. Older non-sourced material needs systematic review. I'll add a few tags to get the processs started. MichaelMaggs (talk) 12:42, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed a LOT of local theater productions. Thousands of cities perform one version or another of this play annually, and it would be impossible to list them all. Bkatcher (talk) 02:28, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: Missing the Christmas Carole with George C. Scott as Scrooge 38.21.40.232 (talk) 16:07, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No. It is listed as it should be under "Television" since it was made for and broadcast there first.Sensei48 (talk) 21:25, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing one 

message: There's also an Iranian movie called A Nowruz Carol which is adapted from A Christmas Carol. But with Nowruz as the new year instead of Christmas. Aminabzz (talk) 16:52, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the original title? 0 Google results turn up for "A Nowruz Carol". HarrySONofBARRY (talk) 03:53, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Nowruz Carol 

message: — Assignment last updated by Eaturvegeez (talk) 00:11, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Technical and Professional Writing

message: Good afternoon, everyone! I am considering adding some subheadings that organize the list of adaptations by dates. (Ex: 1970s, 1980s, 2000s, etc.) I think that this will help organize the long lists of bullet points and help readers who are looking for a specific adaption. For adaptations with the same date (ex: two films that both aired in 1975), I think it would be helpful to categorize them by title. Siceli (talk) 17:59, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potentially adding subcategories
Talk:Brown Memorial Presbyterian Church

message: Added to Calvism portal! -- Secisek (talk) 10:37, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Portal

message: The church website's history page now makes liberal use of this article's text and photo, with the photo attributed. It should be noted that the Wikipedia article text predates, see 
this diff from April 9, 2008, when the article reached GA rating.  JGHowes   talk 18:07, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Church website
Talk:Maire

message: Hello all, just wondering if 
 * Maire, French language for Mayor
ought to be changed to
 * Maire, French language for Mayor
Initially when I first came to the page and mistook the link as linking to Mayor, and attempted to edit it to include the Mayor (France) link only to find out it was already there - should the link be changed in order to reduce the confusion? Still rather new to wikipedia, so apologies for any conventions/formatting rules that I do not yet know of ^^ Shyllelagh (talk) 03:53, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A better link format to Maire (mayor)?
Talk:Giant wrinkled frog

message: I believe it would be better if we discuss on the issue on "CONTROVERSIES" and come to some sort of conclusion. As per my understanding at present I don't think there is a controversy with this taxa. :)--Karthickbala (talk) 16:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Per wikipedia policies WP:NPOV and WP:OR, editors are not supposed to conclude or make original research here. The dispute has been discussed in Reliable sources and citations have been added and the "controversy" angle supported by the newspaper article. It is still controversial since there are unanswered questions, but this is outside the scope of the Wikipedia article. For instance it is rather odd for an author to find fault with their own earlier paper in the tone given. Authors can and do take back their previous conclusions or modify them on the basis of their new research, but this case does not seem to fit in to that category. Shyamal (talk) 03:28, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy