lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Siloam

message: I am surprising that all that concerns the Jewish (always a religion, & never a lay thing or free, so never in science) is always a vast messy (But it's the same things with the Arabic or Muslin stuffs, never in lay way).
Very strangely this name of SILOAM is something very clear in Old Welsh. It has nothing to see with one bible, the most faking book full of enormous stupidities, since the beginning of the religions, real criminal sects, from 5th/7th centuries.
I don't know the topography nor the history of this city, but the question is to know if one big meteoric is not fallen near this city. If this big stone from the sky has existed in this place & created a pool, so the name of SILOAM is 100% Old-Welsh (Old civilisation from more 4500 years BC & preWelsh more 10.000 until 30.000 BC). If the grave stone is a piece of recycling, reclaiming (as that was so much common by the Old-Welsh who kept the memory in texts), there are several possibilities for the date of this writing. Your article should to add this precision.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.11.17.225 (talk) 12:06, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  LLYLOAM, LLELOHIM, LLELOEM
Talk:Siloam inscription

message: Why is the mysterious word spelled "Zada"? Isn't it better to spell it ZDH, since we don't know its vowels? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:47, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zada 

message: Should mention the fact that it's conspicuously not a conventional ancient middle eastern royal building inscription (e.g. "I king X of Y built Z..."), as would have been expected for an inscription found in that location... AnonMoos (talk) 15:37, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: inscription type

message: The material in the footnote doesn't seem to be out of line, but it should be kept in mind that he's a famous "minimalist"
... AnonMoos (talk) 08:12, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: However, the phrase "poor companion" merely reflects his personal subjective disappointment that it's not a classic royal building inscription.  Others might find the fact that it's not a classic royal building inscription to be highly interesting. AnonMoos (talk) 08:28, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Niels Lemche

message: I have provided now English translations for the original German quotes. What is the common procedure, can the German text now be removed? It is massive. Arminden (talk) 10:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huge Guthe quotes in German 

message: Some additional text has been discovered, still in place.
Proof of biblical kings of Israel, Judah deciphered on Jerusalem rock inscriptions Jerusalem Post, 16 Dec 2022 Auric talk 19:14, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the delay in replying, but in the first browser I tried to use to access that link, there were so many videos running and pop-up windows and junk that it was very hard to actually read the article, so it took me a while to access it in another browser.  Anyway, the claims in the article are quite sensational in terms of Biblical archaeology (far surpassing the Tel Dan inscription and the Moabite stone in specific details about individuals named in the Bible), so I'm a little reluctant to add them to the Wikipedia article based solely on something in the Jerusalem Post.  I would want to know that the conclusions of the discoverer are accepted by some other archaeologists, epigraphers, or relevant scholars.  If true, it would explain why the previously-discovered inscription now in Istanbul is not a classic royal building inscription (as has been pointed out many times).. AnonMoos (talk) 15:25, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional lines
Talk:Tell el-Hesi

message: Hey my fellow slave laborers from the 70s! I see Tom's name there (and Larry), but I don't see our accomplishments listed - ! I came to this page due to all the current commotion in the area, and was gratified to find even this much. Tapatalk has a thread that shows a good modern photo, the Tel now surrounded by the kibbutz. 
 So grab your Trowel and Petisch and let's go this in! Arthu/Oberlin Dragonine9 (talk) 21:31, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  70's excavators!
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Criminal justice

message: Schabir Shaik trial has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. — Black Falcon (Talk) 05:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Featured article review of [[Schabir Shaik trial]]

message: Where can I find the banner template for this WikiProject?
Bwrs (talk) 22:00, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template? 

message: If anyone's interested, I've proposed a new wikiproject for the creation of articles regarding specific prisons here. --Cdogsimmons (talk) 20:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Prisons 

message: This project's subject has a page in the set of Lists of basic topics.
See the proposal at the Village pump to change the names of all those pages.
The Transhumanist 09:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename proposal for the lists of basic topics
Talk:Alabarch

message: User Kass Evans has completely changed the article with what appears to be her own original research. You can see it on her small website Kassevans.com Its interesting research but I think it should be reviewed and reverted if its not supported. It seems odd to me that the Jewish Alabarchs would have been purveyors of the gold mines for Rome. 64.223.120.232 (talk) 03:38, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the fast response. On closer inspection her logic seems flawed. She is considering the Alabarchy to have always been the purveyor of gold mines based on a description in Justinian's 6th century edicts. The edict itself even says that it was "at that time" carried out by that alabarch, suggesting that it wasn't a permanent arrangement. 64.223.120.232 (talk) 03:50, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Own Research?
Talk:Anti-competitive practices

message: I'm removing the section on price discrimination, because it is demonstrably not anti-competitive - in that it does not and cannot reduce competition in a space. Here's a source to that effect: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/facsch_lawrev/1134 Fresheneesz (talk) 19:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Price discrimination is not anti-competititve 

message: This article currently is not properly sourced but it is formatted much like a list, and the items on this page are often sourced as anti-competitive practices. This is a useful article.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of sources

message: From about the 3rd paragraph of "Effects" right down to the end of the article, there are no citations. 
The last two sections in particular, (Section 4	"Anti-competitive practices in different market systems" and Section
5 "The effectiveness of Anti-competitive practices in national stabilization") contain highly dubious statements with nothing to back them up. ENSOsurfer (talk) 14:34, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second half of this article completely lacks citations 

message: This article does not mention non-compete clauses. Are these clauses usually anti-competitive? Jarble (talk) 21:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-compete clauses
Talk:Bethoron

message: :Moving this page from Beth-horon to Bethoron, its English name, per Wikipedia naming guidelines. Tiamut 14:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where did you get the idea that Bethoron is the proper English name, vs. Beth Horon? A Google Scholar search for the latter yeilds 226 results, more than 10 times the number of results for Bethoron. Isarig 18:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe I'm wrong. I have no strong objections to moving it back if that's what people think should be done. Tiamut 19:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Dear Beit Or. This is the second time you delete this material without elaborating as to what the problem is exactly. I have restored much of it, placed some in a footnote, deleted a heading and done a general copy edit. Could you, before deleting this material again, please explain what is "biased" about it and how it fails to conform with WP:NPOV, WP:RS or WP:V? Thank you. Tiamut 00:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of sourced material

message: The Greek name also needs a transliteration. Aminabzz (talk) 00:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek name
Talk:Onias III

message: Is there any possibility of adding dates to this person's life? Stevenmitchell (talk) 23:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates Anyone?

message: The language in this article, being copied verbatim from the Jewish Encyclopedia published over 110 years ago, is archaic and hard to follow. For example, this passage is very convoluted:
"Onias was obliged to yield to his own brother, Jason, a Hellenizer. According to Josephus, Jason became high priest after the death of Onias, the latter's son, who bore the same name, being then a minor. It is strange that both father and son should have been named Onias, and still more strange is the statement of Josephus that the high priest who succeeded Jason and was the brother of Onias and Jason, likewise was called Onias, and did not assume the name of Menelaus until later; for according to this statement there must have been two brothers of the same name."
I'm not familiar enough with the topic to update it, but if anyone is up to the task, a rewrite would be ideal. Sadiemonster (talk) 13:22, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Old-fashioned language
Talk:Tapering (sports)

message: Should there be any mention of possible health benefits and reduced risk of injury because of tapering?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Runningguy (talk • contribs) 01:33, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A decade later, but I think the answer is yes, this should be introduced and expanded upon. Dunc0029 (talk) 16:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Health Benefits
Talk:Cave of Letters

message: What is meant by 4th millenium?  I assume it's from the jewish calendar.  Can we make this C.E./B.C.E?
"In the Cave of Letters were Chalcolithic remains from the 4th millennium"-> From the Discovery section  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.163.106.72 (talk) 21:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Millennium
Talk:Jesus ben Ananias

message: Josephus on Jesus is mostly about what he explicitly says about two figures Jesus of Nazareth knew in the Gospels (from Greek evangelion = good news of military victory, itself perhaps a pun on the Roman victory over Jews and their theology).  However it needs to mention Jesus ben Ananias because of the parallels noted above and the "two Jesuses problem" and the issue these present for Josephus as the only first-century CE reporter of first-century events that even mentions anyone associated with "Him".
This article had a section on the parallels with the tag Main article: Josephus on Jesus as appropriate, so that Josephus' comments on this ben Ananias character could be placed in context with the issues with other clearly modified texts that Christians used to "prove" Jesus had existed historically with a "Jewish" (actually Flavian family by then) source who was not a believer.  Should that article (now also marked POV for lacking any mention of this controversy) be censored, there's at least a note that it should have made mention of poor Jesus ben Ananias.  Josephus on Jesus has an extensive explanation of the issues with Josephus as a source, amazingly omitting his Flavian family ties and co-option as their official historian, so it seems more reasonable to present the issues in that article.  Briefly stated, this figure must be one or all of three things:
*proof of Josephus incorporating questionable stories thus making him useless as a validation for the existence of Jesus of Nazareth or "his brother" James or John the Baptist
*prototyping or reporting a character in War of the Jews that is later adapted in the Gospels by himself or other authors 
*evidence for a rather remarkable claim that there were many prophets named Jesus wandering around Jerusalem, annoying the authorities, getting whipped to the bone, refusing to apologize nor condemn his torturers, and dying horribly.
The third is essentially what all Christian scholars seem to claim, but their perspective should not be highly regarded on Wikipedia, due to their obvious conflict of interest.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.11.94.233 (talk) 14:13, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  where and how to link with [[Josephus on Jesus]] 

message: Is Josephus the only source we have for Jesus ben Ananias? If so, I think it is worth mentioning that fact. Ashmoo (talk) 13:03, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Single source?
Talk:Nuriel

message: The talisman link is no longer available, i don't know how to edit but i will give the link :https://web.archive.org/web/20110519032815/http://www.chesternovello.com/default.aspx?TabId=2432&State_3041=2&workId_3041=14512 186.177.188.243 (talk) 05:26, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived reference
Talk:The Dreamland Chronicles

message: The redirect Scott Christian Sava has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  QuickQuokka [⁠talk • contribs] 23:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Scott Christian Sava]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Epistle to Diognetus

message: I've only seen evidence that it is thought that the recipient of this letter was the same Diognetus as the tutor of M. Aurelius.  One example, Philip Schaff, "The Apostolic Fathers with Justin Martyr and Irenaeus", (see ).  I'm putting this up as a reference and removing the dissenting argument as there is no citation... as is the case for most of this article, as small as it is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.22.228.93 (talk) 22:31, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is absolutely nothing connecting this letter with the tutor of Marcus Aurelius. It was a popular conjecture to make in the 1800s when people did things like that, and it is probably based on the fact that other early christian apologies are addressed to emperors/high-status individuals. It is not even possible to establish a date for the Epistle, because it lacks sufficient internal evidence to date and the manuscript tradition is poor (and now nonexistent).--WholeWheatIgnatius (talk) 08:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathetes' Diognetus not tutor of M. Aurelius?  Says who.  

message: ¶  Although this Epistle is not included in the first English translation of the antology of early writings called the Apostolic Fathers (by Wm. Wake, circa 1693), it was subsequently included in several English translations of the Apostolic Fathers by the second half of the 19th century.  I would very much appreciate some comments on how this addition to the collection occurred. Sussmanbern (talk) 00:25, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of the Epistle in the Apostolic Fathers 

message: Is the Greek title of this letter Προς Διόγνητον Επιστολή (as the Wikipedia article says) or Επιστολή προς Διόγνητον (as Lake says, see http://www.ccel.org/l/lake/fathers/diognetus.htm)?
No difference in meaning, of course. But are both titles used? Or is this a mistake?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonathan.robie (talk • contribs) 18:21, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Both word orderings would be allowable by Greek grammar.  Many works from ancient times didn't really have exact fixed "titles" in the modern sense... AnonMoos (talk) 07:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Επιστολή προς Διόγνητον or Προς Διόγνητον Επιστολή?
Talk:Angaur language

message: Still seems dubious that this language even exists ... kwami (talk) 05:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, Ethnologue doesn't mention it at all, and there are no other sources that really say something about the language. Belgian man (talk) 15:49, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In "The Changing Structure of a Micronesian Society" by John Useem (American Anthropologist, Vol. 47, No. 4  1945, pp. 567-588), The "Anguarese" people are explicitely described as speaking "Palau".  It sounds a lot like Anguar(ese) is either a dialect or a synonym for Palauan.  — Æµ§œš¹ [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 19:18, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Reichsbund jüdischer Frontsoldaten

message: — Assignment last updated by Dolly City (talk) 16:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Zionism and the Roads Not Taken 1880-1948
Talk:Tom Gross

message: It is not clear why Tom Gross has a godmother.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.68.199.137 (talk) 09:05, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not clear 

message: Must be a date of birth. Valetude (talk) 00:13, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  DoB, please
Talk:The Archko Volume

message: Someone added the "anti-semitic" tag; but I don't know of any evidence that this is an anti-semitic forgery, and I don't think it is.  Rather the contrary, if anything.  But if anyone knows different, and can reference this, by all means say so. Roger Pearse (talk) 14:32, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-semitic 

message: I thought I read that the person who put this out admitted to it being fraud. It doesn't say that in the article. Not sure where to get substantial info regarding that. Misty MH (talk) 10:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Admitted fraud?
Talk:Der Giftpilz

message: Estonian authorities have investigated Lauck's activities in promoting this book's Estonian language translation under §151 of Estonian penal code, which criminalises incitement to social hatred.  Petri Krohn linked "incitement to social hatred" to hate speech, and so did Ghirlandajo.  This is a severe distortion of the issues at hand.
Incitement to social hatred is a form of incitement to crime, with social context being made more explicit and particular crime-executors irrelevant than in the old-fashioned crime of incitement.  Hate speech, a concept mainly from modern Anglophone political landscape, is instead, an expression of hatred, and the legal issues implicit deal largely with limiting such expressions.  Both the concepts and their legal scopes are quite different.
For example of a border case, let's consider a politician's statement that he hates gays.  Under most concepts of hate speech, this would qualify.  Under any incitement standard, it would not qualify.  In order to qualify as incitement to hatred, the politician would need to explicitly state, or very clearly imply, that he intends his listeners or readers to also pick up that hatred, and act upon this. Digwuren 11:16, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estonian KarS §151 

message: We need a RS for the claims about what the book says, not the hateful propaganda book itself! As of now the book is used directly as a ref, see this:
https://research.calvin.edu/german-propaganda-archive/story5.htm
link.
I also wonder if 
http://www.jlaw.com/Articles/idealoccupa.html
or similar has a place in this article. Zezen (talk) 06:58, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary source used 

message: See Mushroom --causa sui (talk) 00:22, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not all toadstools are poisonous
Talk:Shikotan District, Hokkaido

message: Unless I am wrong, and I do not believe that I am, this page and Shikotan are about the exact same geographical area, which is the disputed Shikotan/Spanberg Island in the Kurils.
I understand that the subject of this page is about the political district, and not the island itself; but due to the fact that they are mutually inclusive of each other, plus the ongoing territorial dispute, I am following the "disputed regions" guideline in WP:GEOLAND, and recommend the merger per criteria "1. duplicate" and "3. short text" of WP:MERGEREASON. --Nemoschool (talk) 19:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I kindly ask for your comments... --Nemoschool (talk) 19:30, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think it makes sense. It is of course awkward that the article is about a Japanese entity, and the island is currently Russian, but redirects should solve this problem.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

text: I support merging them. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 19:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

text:  (I'm only replying because I was pinged above). I have no views on the matter either way. Tlhslobus (talk) 23:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger to [[Shikotan]]
Talk:The Myth of the Twentieth Century

message: There is already a good wikipedia page on Rosenberg and it's not clear what a page which uncritically paraphrases and quotes from this horrible book adds. When you uncritically paraphrase a book based on false and basically criminal theories, you appear to be endorsing it. Victoryodaiken (talk) 15:47, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  purpose of this page is not clear 

message: will be disappointed as it's not made clear. In essence however, Rosenberg is propounding and contrasting his myth of Aryanism with prior myths. So it's like a Nazi Joseph Campbell thing. 98.4.112.204 (talk) 05:37, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Readers looking for what the myth is
Talk:1992 Buenos Aires Israeli embassy bombing

message: "Hezbollah has historically assumed responsibility for its attacks."
Not so. Hezbollah has historically used the name Islamic Jihad for kidnappings and bombings of non-Lebanese, non-Israeli targets (it ususally uses the name Islamic Resistance for its resistance attacks on Israel). If anyone knows of any observors or analysts outside of the Iranian government or Hezbollah itself, that have doubts about Hezbollah's culpability for the Islamic Jihad bombings please let us know. --BoogaLouie
*Please provide a source for that. FunkMonk (talk) 06:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hezballah responsiblity and denials

message: Updated ref link to History Commons. Old link outdated. Black Max (talk) 17:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated ref link

message: I fixed the coordinates, but the map still shows the attack as taking place somewhere on the Avenida de Mayo instead of Aroyo street. SegataSanshiro1 (talk) 03:45, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Location incorrect

message: The reference link number 3 listed as: 
3 Calderon, Horacio. "Winds of War in the Levant and Middle East The Hariri and AMIA cases" (Working Papers 14). CAEI. Retrieved 20 July 2012.[permanent dead link]
can be corrected.  I have found the PDF document under this current link at the CAEI site:   
"Winds of War in the Levant and Middle East - The Hariri and AMIA cases" by Horacio Calderon (English)
It is also found as HTTP on horaciocalderon.com
"Winds of War in the Levant and Middle East - The Hariri and AMIA cases" by Horacio Calderon (English)
Daytah (talk) 06:41, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Permanent dead link" has been found 

message: https://m.maariv.co.il/news/world/Article-1091347
'The Supreme Court in Argentina ruled that the attack on the Israeli embassy in Buenos Aires in 1992, in which 29 people were killed, and the attack on the Jewish community center AMIA, in which 85 people were killed in 1994, were carried out by Hezbollah and financed by Iran' 2A00:A041:1CE0:9A00:45C0:E4FC:7FB9:C3C3 (talk) 07:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Court - i ask to add 

message: In the last paragraph of section Responsibility, change renegading to reneging. 2A00:23C6:EE8E:1:8475:7B78:39:629E (talk) 02:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: User:CanonNi (talk|contribs) 02:12, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 April 2024