Talk:Home economics

message: I reformated the colleges and acdemic departments list so that all were displayed in a similar manner, with the parent institution name first, followed first by a colon and then by the full name of the college, school, or department.
The statements about food science are way off base and I don't think they belong in the article at all.  Post a note if you want to discuss this point, otherwise I'm going to take them out. 
Posting here is new to me. Do let me know if I am not following protocol. I added a link to the Board of Human Sciences and revised the name of the program at Iowa State University from Family and Consumer Sciences to Human Sciences. Both have been existence under these names for more than five years. Human sciences (talk) 22:10, 8 March 2010 human sciences 16:10, 8 March 2010
I assume they have now gone? 
It would really help if you would date notes like this (but I know I forget sometimes). I do not know if this was a month ago or two years ago (talk)--BozMo 20:30, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: College list

message: I noticed that there was some concern with the links to “A Taste for Science” and HEARTH that I had added previously, so I am re-inserting them with the assurance that they are not spam. As a virtual exhibit from Cornell University’s Mann Library, the information provided by the “Taste for Science” link is both well-researched and reputable, focusing especially on the development of home economics as a field and the idea of ‘scientific cookery’ in America. HEARTH is a useful online archive through which one may access full texts of home economic books and journals dating from 1820 to 1979.--MannLib (talk) 12:33, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-inserting relevant links 

message: Is it really necessary for this article to espouse the "importance" of Family and Consumer Sciences in an entire section devoted to it? Wikipedia is not the place for the glorification of some educational philosophy's place in North American schools.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.179.106.118 (talk) 23:05, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It should not have been in the article. I just removed it at your prompting.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 01:12, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: According to the lead of the article and according to the quoted sources it should be Family and consumer sciences with an 's'. Why isn't this in the article name? Marcocapelle (talk) 04:42, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happened with the -s? 

message: There's a draft for an outline on this topic at Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Drafts/Outline of family and consumer science if anyone is interested. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:57, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft outline 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Home economics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.cisce.org/data/.../27.%20Home%20Science.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.heia.com.au/images/Journal9/JHEIA92-6.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110429204901/http://www.doe.in.gov/octe/facs/NASAFACS/index.html to http://www.doe.in.gov/octe/facs/NASAFACS/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:04, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hey! I am working on adding new information to this page. I wanted to add more to each century and make it more into a cohesive timeline. Therefore, I am working on adding and organizing the main history section into 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries.
Aahammer99 (talk) 19:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Home Economics from 18-21st Century 

message: This entry is entirely too favorable on the subject. Home Economics in the 1960's was unabashedly a training course in pleasing husbands. It was required for girls (in my state, United States) but not for boys. It was sexist and chauvinistic, and never should have been  sanctione by educational authorities. 2601:346:1180:4320:B1AD:AADC:4E38:3A0A (talk) 16:02, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  tone 

message: Four reason why food are classified into groups 102.143.8.115 (talk) 21:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home economics 

message: Home economics related occupation 124.105.175.214 (talk) 10:54, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  EPP 

message: — Assignment last updated by JN FCS Foods (talk) 16:15, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: FCS 442 Foundations of Family and Consumer Sciences

message: The level of home economics education literacy school students 136.158.122.239 (talk) 12:56, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Home economics