lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nate Fisher (Six Feet Under)

message: (X-post) Wikipedia policies require the inclusion of real-world information to establish notability (see WP:N and WP:FICT and WP:WAF). As a result., the individual articles need to reflect real-world notability (e.g. the character is a demonstrable cultural meme or icon, a la Sherlock Holmes or Hamlet or Mickey Mouse, or else has attracted significant out-of-universe commentary and critical reaction. Please note that notability is not inherited: as a result, incidental "real-world" information (e.g. character portrayed by Actor X) does not currently satisfy our notability criteria. To comment on this question, interested editors should respond to the discussion at WP:FICT or raise the issue at WP:N since, per Wikipedia consensus policy, local opinion never outweighs community-wide opinion and these standards have been asserted at a global level. Additionally, any emendation to the character articles that serve to bring them up to notability standards would be salutary. Eusebeus (talk) 15:56, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: MERGE

message: The article says "In July 2001 (the beginning of the second season), Nate learns that he has arteriovenous malformation (AVM), a potentially fatal brain condition which could cause him to have a seizure or stroke at any time."  I just finished watching the first season and this is revealed in the last episode of the first season.  70.242.192.43 00:44, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology Off?
Talk:Melarmath, Agartala

message: is this a town? Jeffklib 06:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, its a locality.--Victor 18:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 11:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition
Talk:Marmion Avenue

message: As per Google maps and satellite view Marmion Avenue now extends further north than shown in the RJL. Downsize43 (talk) 09:24, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried updating the road junction list, but google maps doesn't want to make a route along Marmion Avenue to the terminus, instead making a weird route around. It seems like the reason is because google doesn't realise that the new section is connected to the roundabout in Yanchep, even though it really is. This is a problem because now I can't work out the distance. Also, what would go in the destinations column, because it doesn't terminate at a road? Silkkappa168 (talk) 07:49, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Northern end
Talk:Astronomical constant

message: I agree with the proposed merger.  The page simply does not stand on it's own: one of the 4 listed quantities (c) is a physical constant and the remaining 3 are units and not fundamental constants. Cosmo0 11:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I retract that because I don't think the cosmological scale page contains anything useful.  But I do think that this article needs a lot of work before it's existence is justified.  Perhaps separate tables for "earth units", "solar units", etc.  It also might be more accurate to call it "astronomical units", rather than constants. Cosmo0 19:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The cosmological scale page has been deleted.  I'm removing the merger proposal.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cosmo0 (talk • contribs) 16:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger 

message: See comments at Talk:Astronomical_system_of_units#disputed and Talk:Astronomical_system_of_units#Third_party_references. Tfr000 (talk) 13:57, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  the articles on astronomical units/constants have problems 
Talk:Liminal

message: I think there are more definitions of the Liminal than those in the liminality article, but I haven't done enough research yet --naught101 06:20, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. There are a lot of liminality links. I just got us started. A lot needs to be done. Maybe I can do some more. Feel free, anyone. This is a liminal disambig (yuk-yuk)Botteville (talk) 16:15, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed redirect 

message: Just a heads up or whom it concerns, that this page has now had repeated vandalism now, and might have more in the future, from social media groups (probably Facebook; see group "Liminal spaces") related to "liminal" photography and other liminal content. What they do is add references to a "pool" in this article. Greetings, RagingR2 (talk) 20:56, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pool"
Talk:Bullsbrook, Western Australia

message: I am fond of a bit of oral history. I suppose someone will remove it, but I found these POV sentences delightful. It is from an 'anonymous' ip but the tone implies CoI.
Anyway, there is an ecological community (Biocoenosis) located in Bullsbrook named the Kings Mound Spring. This is listed as critically endangered. If someone is expanding this article, I can supply info on the community and status. If I add it now I would have to remove the "most correct" contribution. :) Fred 06:15, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oral history and Biocoenosis 

message: Nothing really just saying that Kingsford is now under construction and it's 2022 2001:8003:9107:EB00:54D2:E3AE:6ED9:93DA (talk) 12:50, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New area Kingsford under-construction Oz by 2022
Talk:Midland, Western Australia

message: Question on article:
The post refers to this suburb as "Midland DC". Why? What is the suburbs correct name? Can anyone shed some light on this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.212.211.226 (talk) 02:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would they be a notable attraction for the area? - should be noted that they were burned down today, supposedly (ten news says) it was NOT deliberate. Twenty Years 11:32, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Midland Military Markets
Talk:Whitford Development Scheme

message: For now I have changed the article title back to Whitford, Western Australia as that is what the area is commonly known as. The article title Whitford Development Scheme (entered by user Orderinchaos), was somewhat confusing as the article did not detail any such scheme.
I noticed that Orderinchaos also wrote the following related info when creating the Whitfords Avenue article:
“It took its name from the Whitford Satellite City development through which it was built in the 1970s, which was later split into the suburbs of Hillarys, Padbury, Kallaroo and Craigie.
Orderinchaos: If you have any historical info it would be great if you could add it to the article.
Thanks!
Betelgeusean 10:20, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been kept busy elsewhere - been meaning to come back and do the five development scheme articles (Hamersley, Whitford, Mullaloo, Mirrabooka, Joondalup) and have some of, but not all of, the research for that completed, which I did when writing the FA for Hamersley, Western Australia (the suburb). The DS's came out of the Metropolitan Region Planning Authority in conjunction with the councils, and actually were specific schemes with scheme texts, hence the awkward name. Most of them were too ambitious and fell through, Joondalup was the most successful by far, while Whitford did not meet its initial promise, and Hamersley (the first off the rank) didn't even really get off the ground - not helped by being the first, nor by being split between two councils. One minor thing - the x, WA notation can only be used for gazetted suburbs - another reason for the move. Orderinchaos 12:13, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Yeah, where Whitford City is now was actually meant to be a new CBD. There was also meant to be one at Marmion (now the area bounded by Chessell, Burragah, Marmion and Beach in Duncraig where the McDonalds is) and of course Joondalup, which eventually did happen. Orderinchaos 04:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whitford Development Scheme 

message: Forgot to get dates or titles for these :| Will have to check next time I'm at the Battye. I'll have to request the SoW files again too from SRO, I seem to have lost my written notes, which included Margaret Feilman naming Hillarys streets after sea-based explorers and Padbury streets after land-based ones in 1971ish.
* Resolution to develop a town planning scheme - Shire of Wanneroo (1967:1782)
* Advertised town planning scheme (TPS 1) (1970:1641)
* 1971? Whitford Townsite declared
* Approved 13 June 1972 (1972:3541)
* Naming of Localities - Shire of Wanneroo (per 4276/69 V2) (24 October 1975) 1975:3956 - saw naming of Craigie, Whitfords, Padbury and Hillarys as suburbs. Orderinchaos 04:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gazettals
Talk:Yokine, Western Australia

message: There is currently an AfD concerning the Dog Swamp Shopping Centre, however I notice Centro Flinders has an article also.  In line with Wikipedia:Places of local interest (which in turn refers to Wikipedia:Notability) "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject."  I see no evidence that for these centres there is significant coverage of this type.--Matilda talk 20:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of shopping centre articles 
Talk:Secret Harbour, Western Australia

message: Most Australian's, myself included, solely know of Secret Harbor by the comedic sharing that, 'The secret of Secret Harbour is that there is no harbour!' something that is clearly lacking in the article. Whether it's too tongue in cheek for inclusion is probably offset by the fact that it's an inherently notable feature of the town, especially outside of WA where it's existence would probably be unheard of if it weren't for the secret of Secret Harbour! ;) BaSH PR0MPT (talk) 10:21, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  You know, the secret is out, right? 

message: Does anyone have any old photos of secret harbour ive lived here all my life but cant seem to find ant photos of it from before 2010, if you have any can u please link them in the wiki page or under this comment? 106.68.224.7 (talk) 07:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old photos
Talk:Scarborough, Western Australia

message: Scarborough wavesItalic text - "the popular consensus is that Scarborough's waves are poor" - not sure that this is true, and in any case its unsourced. Scarborough definitely gets its share of surfers travelling to it from other less popular beaches and the waves can be very good Phenalot (talk) 07:44, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, it appears to simply be a random person's opinion. Your edit seems fair to me. Orderinchaos 08:20, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

message: How is the statement "This caused a bunch of old boring people to protest against high rise and the development of Scarborough"  NPOV?  A load of "boring old people" (who would surely have been much younger then) complained against Observation City, and it has been described as an "eyesore" and blott on the landscape ever since.  Local people don't like the idea of high rise development because they think it will block their ocean views (which they paid a premium for), or have a whole mass of people looking into their windows and back yards and taking away their privacy.  I'm not one of them, by the way, but their view is legimate, at least as legimate as those who think that high rise development will somehow mean more pubs and clubs in the area.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.39.162.130 (talk) 11:52, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV?
Talk:Champaran

message: I have added Internal Links and tried to Clean Up Spelling and Grammar.  Kathleen.wright5 00:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Internal Links and tried to clean up Spelling and Grammar 

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:12, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 

message: It is wrong to say that Kushans were Turks. At the best, it can be said that they were the Central Asian Tribes. Some related articles give reference to such a fact. Secondly, the major source on Kushan before they reached India is mainly Chinese Sources. It was only later that when they adopted Buddhism that we learn about them from Indian sources. Further, Gandhara Art which flourished during the period of Kanishka, carry the imprint of Grecian art forms. Therefore, this issue is yet not settled among the historians that what actually was the race or origin of Kushans. From the archaeological sources we come to know only this much, that they had operated in Chinese territory and later they moved in to territory of Bazantine empire. There are proofs that they reached India and ruled over the territories in the north India. They were influenced by Buddhism. Thus, I have deleted the 'Turk' reference to them. --Sumir 07:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kushan and Turks
Talk:Wanneroo Road

message: I'm of the opinion that, as Wanneroo Road is technically multiplexed with State Routes 81 and 83, they should also be included in the infobox alongside State Route 60, no matter how minor or short the allocations may be. Outrune (talk) 13:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur. The Roe Highway page shows National 94 & 95 in the infobox, even though Roe Hwy is only multiplexed with them for short sections. Another way to include SR 81 & 83 would be via the Allocation field of the infobox (which can be seen on the Roe Hwy page) Evad37 (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree, purely because of the extremely short carriage length - no more than 150 metres in both instances on a road which is over 75 kilometres in length. I'm not opposed to listing it somewhere but the box becomes almost unreadable on a mobile phone at the size it was prior to removing the two shields, and it confuses readers. The issue with Roe Highway is somewhat different as the ratio is vastly different - a few kilometres each on a much shorter road. Orderinchaos 20:39, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: State Routes

message: I have made a new table design for major junctions on main roads, which I have used on the Morley Drive page I created yesterday. It is based on the freeway/highways table (as shown on Reid Highway),  but with 'Junctions' instead of 'Exits', and a red title bar instead of green. I know Wikipedia says to be bold, but I thought I should ask for some feedback before spending time changing a whole lot of pages.
(PS - How do I bring a new page to the attention of a Wikiproject?) Evad37 (talk) 18:44, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd suggest posting at WT:WA, and linking to the discussion from WP:AWNB to alert a wider group of editors. The box looks good, by the way :) Orderinchaos 20:40, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: New Table Design for Junctions
Talk:Leopard of Rudraprayag

message: This page can be clubbed with Jim corbett. Leopard of Rudraprayag need not have a separate page. Any suggestions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.188.167 (talk) 03:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think contents of this page should be put under Jim Corbett (Hunter), though it will be appropriate to have this page grow on its own too, as this Leopard had significant importance outside the Jim Corbett(Hunter) article.
Harshonline (talk) 17:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving this page under Jim Corbett
Talk:Maharaja Fateh Singh Museum

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.gujarattourism.com/destination/details/9/395. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Jack Frost (talk) 10:38, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Haj subsidy

message: the article itself is called hajj which seems to be the standard english term. Why is this article and the Haj Committee of India one using alternate spelling haj? 76.24.104.52 (talk) 03:39, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: I have moved this content from the article to the talk page. -- ÐℬigXЯaɣ 08:10, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Air ticket to jeddah
Talk:Legation

message: Wassa diff with plain ole "mission"?  There are still plenty of countries which maintain non-embassy presences in other countries.  The US representative in TAIWAN, say.
Has something materially changed here or just the terminology?  Instead of "envoy" and "mission", can I speak of the American "legate" and "legation" to/in Taiwan? 67.150.82.193 (talk) 08:23, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Envoy? 

message: Movie "Who done it?" features the "Uralian Legation", complete with sign!
A factoid which has yet to make it to google, apparently.  But the clip is on YouTube.  67.150.82.193 (talk) 08:29, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benny Hill
Talk:Malhar

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support Hekerui (talk) 09:19, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Why doesn’t it say the Arohanam and Avarohanam precisely with the numbers? Manusriram7 (talk) 15:30, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arkham am & Avarohanam
Talk:Tehsildar

message: Tehsildar is the person who collect revenue from tehsil. he has alot of power in this context. he tranfer the land to another person. he signs domiciles etc.
Kuldeep poonia  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.175.173 (talk) 05:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Tehsildar]]
Talk:Damien Oliver

message: His actual name is Damien. Not Damian. This needs to be moved, might do it later - but if anyone else stops here and feels like doing it. Do it. jkm 06:53, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Damian Oliver page redirects here.Cuddy Wifter (talk) 03:55, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Engineer's Day

message: Wouldn't it be more appropriate if this page was called "Engineer's Day In India"? What about other countries? In Brazil it is December 11th. (Nicholas 200.172.90.34 (talk) 14:07, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint
Talk:Pushbanta Palace

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 11:07, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition 
Talk:Thirumandhamkunnu Temple

message: The links in this article do not connect. I suspect all are dead links, though I flagged only one as dead.
Text quality is poor, difficult to understand. Wording seems completely “in-universe”, meaning one must already know the lore to follow the text. Plainer language will greatly improve the article, especially for people not already familiar with this Hindu temple. Some basics, like when was the temple built, are not mentioned, even by century of construction. The only dates are for artwork added in the 20th century. - - Prairieplant (talk) 17:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links and text quality 

message: I can find very few references to this temple. The only reliable, non-SPS I could find were a few articles from March 2023 about a controversy over the color that the temple was painted.See, e.g.,  The rest of the sources on Google appear to be either tourism websites or travel blogs. Google Scholar turns up one Bachelor's degree thesis that discusses the Temple. There are no references to the Temple on WP:WIKILIB. If this is a notable temple, reliable sources are likely to be in Malayalam.
 voorts (talk/contributions) 17:02, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:NGEO|Notability]] of article
Talk:Ralli quilt

message: Well I tried, I don't think it really did much. I'm going to put this on my watch list and do some research, when I feel up to it I'll come back and try and sort some stuff out.  I'm fairly sure this was someone's spam. CMBryanDaDuke 16:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete rewrite 
Talk:Munnuru Kapu

message: Minor English syntax edits. AbbyMay (talk) 03:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arbitrary heading 

message: This book is much cited in the article. There are several problems:
*The publisher etc is not given
*We have no idea of the credentials of the author - are they a reliable source? Are they affiliated to the Kapus?
*We have no idea what page is being cited for each point
*For the vast majority of readers of English-language Wikipedia, the source is useless because it is not written in the English language. That is not a problem in itself but, in particular bearing in mind that caste articles are prone to very poor use of sources etc, we really do need translations for the various points. Better still would be modern English-language sources that could replace this thing. - Sitush (talk) 01:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed it for now. I'm pretty sure it is unreliable. - Sitush (talk) 08:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telugu source
Talk:Two Rocks

message: Dumping here in case it's of use:
 "It is hereby notified that it is intended to grant a special lease over Swan Location 8796 to Yanchep Estates Pty. Ltd. and Bond Corporation Pty. Ltd. for the purpose of a "Yacht Harbour" for a term of 21 years." Orderinchaos 17:57, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled