Talk:Internationalist (album)

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:13, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yay. Dihydrogen Monoxide ♫ 09:13, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Here is the revision of the page I assessed, but I have since made subsequent edits. Below is my assessment.
:GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#: (no edit wars etc.)
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
Further anaylsis on findings:
*The album image was correctly tagged, used appropriately and a fair-use rationale was applied.  
*Grammar, prose and spelling is excellent.
*Everything is readable, and doesn't incorporate words that a beginning editor or reader wouldn't understand.
*It is very good for the excellent work of Dihydrogen Monoxide and Slabba, and avoids POV-style content, something important for an GA nominee.
*The article is focused and addresses a broad range of information without going into unnecessary detail. 
I am therefore willing to  pass this article. Well done! — Rudget speak.work 20:10, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Article Assessment

message: But we had all along that the P2K recording was from the Farewell to the World concert. It was actually from the 25th anniversary/birthday celebration concert in '98. I've corrected it now, but it's amazing that it wasn't picked up sooner. Anyway, now that I've done that, we really ought to seek a reference for it (other than that in the recording itself, they reference it). --lincalinca 13:24, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *sheepish grin* - we have a ref though, , which I'll add inline to make it a bit more clear. — Dihydrogen Monoxide (Review) 22:34, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I can't believe we missed this in the FA 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Internationalist (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130111003357/http://www.fiftyfifty.tv/?act=project&cat=musicvideo to http://www.fiftyfifty.tv/?act=project&cat=musicvideo
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070830180212/http://maxtv.com.au/Max/Article.aspx?ID=1282 to http://maxtv.com.au/Max/Article.aspx?id=1282
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:15, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Internationalist (album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071216103040/http://www.hindleysite.com/songs/dayoutcome.htm to http://www.hindleysite.com/songs/dayoutcome.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article is currently orange tagged and has been for a year. The nominator of the FAC is inactive; is anyone able to fix these issues? Anarchyte (talk) 08:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that you noticed this for an FA review. Do you still have these concerns? If so, do you want to bring this to FAR? Z1720 (talk) 21:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I haven't read through the page in much detail myself, but from a brief skim it doesn't seem like the outdated tag warrants any changes. The lead is a bit short, but that's nothing that can't be fixed outside of FAR. Perhaps  can shed some light on the tags? Anarchyte (talk) 03:40, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I felt its sources didn't live up to current FA standards. I recall trying to look for higher quality ones but barely found anything. 웃OO 03:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, perhaps a formal FAR is in order just to alleviate any concerns about the article. Anarchyte (talk) 10:07, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can one of you bring it to FAR? You will be able to speak to the concerns more effectively than me and, since I often nominate at FAR, I am limited by how many nominations I can bring to the process. If you have any concerns or questions, feel free to ping/message me. Z1720 (talk) 13:41, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA review