Talk:List of United States extradition treaties

message: Can someone check the dates for El Salvador and Honduras?  I don't believe 2011 and 2028 (respectively) are correct. BrianRaker 08:54, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Error check

message: What does:
:L - List treaty
:DC - Dual criminality treaty
Actually mean? How are these different to the other types of treaty? It needs to be explained if these annotations are being used on this page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.171.17.232 (talk) 10:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Meanings

message: Entered into force entry with a date of "May 19, 2029" seems to be wrong and should possibly read 1929.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.149.143.202 (talk) 09:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected. --FeralOink (talk) 19:03, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congo 

message: What's it mean? There should probably be a legend floating right so people can see what the acronyms mean. — -dainomite   08:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed! I took care of that. It is now defined, and a reference added. --FeralOink (talk) 19:05, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much! You are awesome.  Cheers, — -dainomite   19:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  TIAS? 

message: A more interesting list would be a list of those countries that do not have an extradition treaty with the US with notes on which countries have done recent extraditions even without a treaty.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.173.136.32 (talk) 23:29, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No extradition treaty? 

message: This list currently assumes that all who have a treaty will extradit convicts if requested. But it's more complex than that. Take this:
<BLOCKQUOTE>I will make a larger point about what happened in Hong Kong. We are deeply disappointed by the decision of the authorities in Hong Kong to permit Mr. Snowden to flee despite a legally valid U.S. request to arrest him for purposes of his extradition under the U.S.-Hong Kong Surrender Agreement. We’ve registered our strong objections to the authorities in Hong Kong as well as to the Chinese Government through diplomatic channels, and we’ve noted that such behavior is detrimental to U.S.-Hong Kong and U.S.-China bilateral relations....
For us, we’re just not buying that this was a technical decision by a Hong Kong immigration official. This was a deliberate choice by the government to release a fugitive despite a valid arrest warrant. And that decision, as I said, unquestionably has a negative impact on the U.S.-China relationship....
And then, though the Privacy Act prohibits me from talking about Mr. Snowden’s passport specifically, I can say that the Hong Kong authorities were well aware of our interest in Mr. Snowden and had plenty of time to prohibited his travel. So they were well aware. Clearly, the Department of Justice can provide you more granularity on the day-by-day actions we took in terms of sharing information with them, including some of the public information that’s available.[http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2013/06/211081.htm#TURKEY</BLOCKQUOTE>
Do we make any distinctions here? Bataaf van Oranje (talk) 21:22, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  De facto and de jure agreements 

message: it's a bit unclear to me if this should also include previous treaties that are no longer in force. For example, I notice that in the treaty with the Netherlands it is explicitely referring to two previous treaties that will no longer be in force because of that newer treaty. For historical purposes, recording those would be interesting though. For this list it would be helpful to at least make an explicit choice. effeietsanders 19:21, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  old treaties 

message: IDK if people have seen it but all the links in the List are Dead, can someone replace them with updated ones? Qutlooker (talk) 23:26, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed! (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 16:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  All links are Dead 

message: some countries (e.g. those in the European Union) will not extradite anyone to the US if the person would be subject to the death penalty.  Ira Einhorn is an example. 24.206.70.40 (talk) 19:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death penalty