Talk:Do It (Nelly Furtado song)

message: Hmm, it seems a little strange that this article is so short, and yet there is a very comprehensive article on the plagiarism controversy surrounding the song at 2007 Timbaland plagiarism controversy. Maybe there should be a summary of that article in this one? Extraordinary Machine 22:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't seem to be much more to say about this song itself, as its notability is based on the controversy. The 2007 Timbaland plagiarism controversy talks about both this song and the ringtone, and while the summary can be a bit longer, extensive duplicate content should be avoided. Has airplay (if it is played on radio, I wouldn't know) of this song been affected? Any critical reviews of the song? Pomte 23:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs expanding 

message: In God's Hands was just announced.  Of course, Do It is uncomfirmed. Because neither Nelly nor her label has been quoted as saying this. This is graffiti, albeit, benevolent. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Insaneace1 (talk • contribs) 11:57, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graffiti 

message: Is this song going to be the next single for her album? Yellowstone County Girl 03:40, 22 June 2007 
(UTC)
I'd love to know this too, it's my favourite song on the album but I can't find any sources that back the statements here up? I hope it's true though! Martyy1 11:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next Single? 

message: Apparently Missy Elliot remixed it, and it has been leaked? 211.30.60.106 05:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missy Elliot 

message: Wikipedia:Guide_to_layout#Headers_and_paragraphs recommends (for good reason) against short sections, which is particularly relevant to this article, in which the paragraphs about the music video and plagiarism allegations controversy are not large enough for their own sections. Even if this wasn't the case, note that only first words and proper nouns should be capitalised in section headers; thus, "Music video", not "Music Video". Extraordinary Machine 18:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unneeded section headers 

message: WEll, I saw this cover, and it think its a foney because I saw it on this other website and it made by this guy thats a fan of Nelly Furtado. So I'm not sure if thats the cover? Explode24 (UTC)
I saw it too & it's definitely not the real cover. 211.30.60.106 10:21, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover 

message: The cover at the moment is this a fan-made cover or is this cover on the official cover because it looks fan made. Explode24 15:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover again 

message: People, stop putting fake covers. I am deleting it.Explode24 18:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover 

message: :Image:Nelly+do+it.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Nelly+do+it.jpg

message: Added this part to the intro as, after all, the case is still in appeals. Tooironic (talk) 21:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "it was alleged" 

message: I want to know what this article needs to be done for it to become a good article? Garry says OK (talk) 23:03, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA article? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Do It (Nelly Furtado song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071114232359/http://blog.muchmusic.com:80/archives/2007/07/nelly_furtado_v.php to http://blog.muchmusic.com/archives/2007/07/nelly_furtado_v.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080105014656/http://blogcritics.org:80/archives/2006/07/04/072323.php to http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/07/04/072323.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080411082519/http://www.mtv.com:80/bands/f/furtado_nelly/qa_feature_060706/ to http://www.mtv.com/bands/f/furtado_nelly/qa_feature_060706/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080123123853/http://media.www.thenorthernlight.org:80/media/storage/paper960/news/2006/07/11/AE/Furtados.Low.Not.Bad-2542565.shtml to http://media.www.thenorthernlight.org/media/storage/paper960/news/2006/07/11/AE/Furtados.Low.Not.Bad-2542565.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071229092813/http://www.okayplayer.com:80/reviews/index.php/weblog/more/loose/Add to http://www.okayplayer.com/reviews/index.php/weblog/more/loose/Add
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071114232359/http://blog.muchmusic.com:80/archives/2007/07/nelly_furtado_v.php to http://blog.muchmusic.com/archives/2007/07/nelly_furtado_v.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121017104543/http://www.chartstats.com/songinfo.php?id=33518 to http://www.chartstats.com/songinfo.php?id=33518
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:40, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Do It (Nelly Furtado song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011131121/http://umusic.ca/nellyfurtado/ to http://umusic.ca/nellyfurtado/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hi I noticed you reverted the edit of deleting your add on of claiming the songwriters or songwriter as dubious… You didn't even explain your excuse of adding it on your edit summary from January and still didn’t yesterday. You also didn’t even care to start a discussion on why you feel it’s dubious when it’s clearly sourced by coming from the albums liner notes, nor did you care to start a discussion on the albums page Loose. It’s sourced within the albums liner notes which is cited within the article. I will also be including a source coming from Nellys official YouTube channel of the song which is states all 3 (Nelly, Timbaland and Danja) are the songwriters of the song. If you still feel as if this is dubious then I would recommend opening a discussion on the articles talk page, or reply back to me. If you can’t do either of those things then I would recommend leaving it alone because it’s clearly not dubious. 
Thank you 
Pillowdelight (talk) 02:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: As it has been revealed that Timbaland simply remixed a song by another artist and then claimed it as his own work I would say his claim of writing it is dubious. That he lied in the liner notes and a YouTube clip does not invalidate better sources. // Liftarn (talk) 05:54, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This source claims it was settled in court, no where does it state they had to be credited as songwriters on the song. So placing it as dubious isn’t necessary especially if it’s already been settled in court in 2009. 
Pillowdelight (talk) 11:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  And? We should still say who the songwriter(s) actually are, not just duplicate liner notes. // Liftarn (talk) 12:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, it was settled in court. Just because he got sued for plagiarizing the song doesn’t mean the songwriters of the original song need to be credited. Especially if they didn’t ask to be credited or were ruled by the court to be credited. The only way they would have to be credited is if a source claims they were to be credited. Which didn’t happen. But from the source coming from the Medium as I linked on my previous message doesn’t state anything about them having to be credited. Also this isn’t even a requirement for Wiki guidelines. 
Pillowdelight (talk) 13:21, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

text: That’s not even what we’re discussing about. But I do believe Danja should be listed as I wouldn’t even trust BMI. Plus makes no sense that he’d be listed on the liner notes, her Spotify credits on the song and YouTube credits on the song, both of which being sourced by coming from the databases of Mosley & Geffen.
Pillowdelight (talk) 07:00, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious