lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Baglihar Dam

message: The 2nd sentence gives info that seems out of place here. Could someone determine where it should be? Ed8r (talk) 23:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final paragraph 

message: Baglihar Dam was in Doda District of Jammu and Kashmir , not in Ramban District 2405:201:5508:AD31:493F:EC17:D272:7DE2 (talk) 15:09, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . A reliable source has been provided for the statement.  -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:58, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baglihar Dam was in Doda District of Jammu and Kashmir , not in Ramban District.
Talk:Bagurumba

message: The content of this page is an exact copy of the Bagurumba section in Folk Dances of Assam. There is no reason for it to have it's own page. GrainyMagazine (talk) 04:28, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Bahram I

message: There is a good amount of scholarship out there to suggest Shaphur had actually engineered Manicheanism to infect the Roman legions with a pacifist religion.  How good are the sources for the actual existence of Mani?Canlawtictoc (talk) 08:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shapur I and tolerance of religious diversity[[User:Canlawtictoc|Canlawtictoc]] ([[User talk:Canlawtictoc|talk]]) 08:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Bahram II

message: I was wondering whether you perhaps know where to find an uploadable image of this silver cup depicting Bahram II and his wife, stored at the Art Museum of Georgia, Tbilisi (R134)? Would be a good addition to this article. - LouisAragon (talk) 20:01, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I failed to find it either in Commons or my own collection. I will take a photo of the cup during my next visit to the museum, which I hope will happen sometime soon.--KoberTalk 19:01, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Silver cup
Talk:Bahram III

message: I really can not find any more information on this king. Does anyone have any more sources with information that may be relevant to the article? --Kuzwa (talk) 02:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info 
Talk:BAIF Development Research Foundation

message: Dear "I am one of many"
Good afternoon,
I am trying to update the information regarding BAIF Development Research Foundation. BAIF is an non-profit organisation based out of India working on rural poverty since 1967. Our website is www.baif.org.in were you could get further details. Now when we see our Wikipedia page a lot of information is either not there or is outdated and that is what we are trying to fix and update. I have been authorized by my organisation to do the changes. So kindly allow us to do so.
Ks.baif (talk) 09:08, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Everyone here is a volunteer.  It really isn't difficult to follow policy.   For example, this looks like a reliable source for writing an article.  Approach writing as though you had never heard of BAIF and you are trying to write an encyclopedia article based only on such sources. Here are some other possible sources: , , .  Whatever you do, don't copy and past.  Neutrally summarize the content.I am One of Many (talk) 05:42, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

text: Copy/paste of advertising/marketing material from the BAIF website is not how one writes and encyclopedia.  Millahnna (talk) 18:30, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to "I am one of many" to allow us to edit BAIF Development Research Foundation page 

message: I have significantly expanded the article in recent weeks. Let me know if anything else needs to be added here. You can briefly outline what is lacking, and then I can source inormation on that topic and add it. Of course everyone can add content as long as it is supported by independent reliable source. Thanks. Jonathansammy (talk) 01:51, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion 

message: I have reassessed the article. The prose and text are good enough for C-class, but the article needs an infobox for C-class. I have also removed the stub templates from the article. Further expansion with references could be substantial for the development towards B-class. Note that I have removed the article from the reassessment page. PrathuCoder (talk) 18:41, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for Reassessment 

message: I have significanty expanded this article but it lacks images.It would be good if photographs of activities undertaken by BAIF are uploaded on Creative Commons.The images have to be your own work rather than copyright images.Thanks. Jonathansammy (talk) 18:21, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Saint Ann Catholic Church (Kaneohe, Hawaii)

message: I suspect that the ″Le P. Stanislas et le P. Martial.″ described in this French test here are the missionaries of Saint Ann in 1852. Can someone confirm that P. Martial is Father Robert Martial Janvier ? Hektor (talk) 20:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Le P. Stanislas et le P. Martial.
Talk:Bajaj Chetak

message: Please help improve this article. Maharuf (talk) 15:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs improvement
Talk:Bakarwal

message: The content of the "Society" section was added along with other content, on 25 October 2015 by IP editor 27.97.7.206 without any citations.  The same text was published a year later in   It is not clear if the IP editor copied from a prepublication copy of the Suri & Raina paper, or whether Suri & Raina copied from the Wikipedia without citation.  Given that Suri has been publishing about the Bakarwal since at least 2013, it might seem unlikely that such an author would need to plagiarise the Wikipedia concerning such a description. It is also possible that Suri's description of Bakarwal society was drawn from an earlier paper of hers and was just reproduced in her October 2016 paper, thus providing the IP editor with the text a year earlier in October 2015.  On this basis it might possibly be a copyright violation and I have marked it with the  template. What gives me pause, however, is the appearence in the Suri & Raina paper of text from the Wikipedia that was not added by 27.97.7.206. Most notable, is that by April 2015 the Wikipedia article stated inter-marriages freely take place among them with a citation that confirms, however in May 2015 IP editor 123.239.164.149 changed that to inter-marriages dont take place among them with this edit, and then the Suri & Raina paper apes the incorrect information stating inter-marriages do not take place among them. The Wikipedia article was not corrected from 123.239.164.149's spurious edit until May 2017 with this edit by InformavoreSultan, at which time the text again conformed with the cited source.  That suggests that the Suri & Raina paper copied the Wikipedia. --Bejnar (talk) 22:01, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Society section copyright problem or plagiarism 

message: I note the section above expressing concern about copyright issues. The history section of the article also has them, being a close paraphrase of the TRCF report cited. It isn't a great source anyway: it reports what one Bakarwal activist said, which is pretty much as opposed to WP:RS as can be got. At best, it should be replaced; at worst, it needs a re-write. - Sitush (talk) 15:58, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History section
Talk:Balachandran Chullikkad

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved as unopposed.  Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:11, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Balachandran Chullikkadu →  – Most sources used in this article spells his surname as "Chullikkad" without a "u"; Also the spelling Chullikkad yields more search results than Chullikkadu; The covers of his books also use the spelling "Chullikkad" Malayala Sahityam (talk) 23:29, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 January 2023
Talk:Balak Singh

message: Using Satguru and ji is a necessary form of respect Nopede Dopede (talk) 18:03, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not on Wikipedia. See MOS:HONORIFIC. We do not add "Satguru", "PBUH", "Ji", "+", or any other such suffix to names. —C.Fred (talk) 20:49, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resoect
Talk:John Collins Warren

message: The cross-ref atop this article says:
For his son who was also a surgeon, see John Collins Warren, Jr.
On navigating thereto, we're told the latter:
was born ... to Dr. Jonathan Mason Warren ...
So who's wrong, the writer of this heading or the writer of the other article?
For that matter, you wanna name this Warren's wife, and children?
--Jim Luedke
Jimlue (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: As usual, Wikipedia is wrong
Talk:1982 Florida subtropical storm

message: Not bad. Might want to consider moving it to Subtropical Storm One (1982). Good luck! íslenskur fellibylur #12 (samtal) 02:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: GA pass. Good job! Juliancolton (talk) 16:12, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its at Wikipedia:Peer review to get more advice for now. Maybe after. Mitch32contribs 19:53, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Other than needing aftermath section, I think it could easily be A. Juliancolton (talk) 20:09, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aftermath don't exist as this was a majorly weak storm. Not much you can find with $10 million. Also, A is pretty much the same as FA, so it'll probably be A when its up at FAC.Mitch32contribs 20:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA
Talk:The Chinese Botanist's Daughters

message: The "controversy" section is horribly written... I'm cleaning it up a little, but I hope the original writer will make some modifications as well, since I don't know that much about the movie. 
I deleted this sentence about Jamponoi's acting -- it contributes very little, and there was no citation. Isn't there usually a "Critical Reception" section? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fonny (talk • contribs) 01:15, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Balimela Reservoir

message: The following section has been removed to the Talk page as it is a clear violation of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.  The passage should be rewritten entirely, providing citations to back up any assertions, and giving both sides of any dispute.  It must be written in an impartial and balanced tone.  It must not give the writer's personal opinion of any dispute.
Hi, Skinsmoke,  The content says there is a dispute between Odisha and Andhra Pradesh regarding installation of 30 MW hydropower unit  citing the agreement between the states (1962 Agreements - pages 239 to 242). It has not supported any state to be biased. The content is fully in compliance with the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. It only suggested that cheap renewable electricity generation is not taking place due to the disputes and should be resolved amicably. If the 'editor' has more information on this subject, it should be given with references in the article / talk page. It is objectionable and biased act to delete the content from the article and transfer to talk page without prior discussion. The editor (Skinsmoke)should record the reply here. Kwdt2 (talk) 16:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Neutral point of view 
Talk:Baliram Kashyap

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 02:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: with chhattisgarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chhattisgarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/chhattisgarh workgroup Addition 
Talk:Ballāla Sena

message: The article says "The Pals and Malla were followers of Buddhism. Ballal Sena was considered a staunch Hindu.", whereas the page on Bengal specifically describes the Mallas as the worshippers of Shiva.
Amitava Chakraborty (talk) 04:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Mallas Buddhists or Hindu 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:04, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Balmikism

message: walmiki is the god of all indian koli's. they are tribe but anfortunetly govt of india are not doing anytthoing for us. they are not submitted us in shedul tribe. around 80% koli's lost his govt jobs becouse of cast validity problem govtof india are not give us cast validity please god save us.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.178.8.223 (talk) 16:28, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  walmii 

message: I have just reverted to approximately a year ago, prior to the edits by . They have had umpteen warnings about poor phrasing, overciting, duplicate citing, unreliable sources, misuse of honorifics and pretty much anything else you can think of, culminating in a discretionary sanctions alert issued by  last September and one issued by me today. They mean well, despite an obvious agenda to promote dalits, but it is horrendous trying to clean up after them. Perhaps a bit more of this indiscriminate reverting might make them at last learn to abide by our policies and guidelines. If not, it will be a topic ban, I think. - Sitush (talk) 12:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert
Talk:Bamba Dhura

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition
Talk:Bāṇabhaṭṭa

message: The short page Bānabhatta should be merged with the longer page on the same person B%C4%81%E1%B9%87abha%E1%B9%AD%E1%B9%ADa. Vedabit (talk) 14:52, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Kadambari as a novel 42.105.198.57 (talk) 14:24, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  English
Talk:Vase de Noces

message: NY Times review: http://movies2.nytimes.com/mem/movies/review.html?_r=2&title1=&title2=Wedding+Trough+%28Vase+De+Noces%29+%28Movie%29&reviewer=&v_id=155861&pdate=19750412&oref=slogin&oref=login
zafiroblue05 | Talk 02:08, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It says that the main character is autistic, but what is this based on? There is no reason to claim autism over any other intellectual or mental disorders. The statement regarding autism should be removed  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.124.213.83 (talk) 13:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claiming main character is autistic
Talk:Bandra–Worli Sea Link

message: Why should it be included in Wiki, there are bridges all over the world which are far more techinically advanced in its construction than the Bandra Worli Sea Link. I still dont understand its importanceShubhoshreemitra (talk) 21:05, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it is India's largest sea link. It may not be the best, biggest, whatever, but it does sit on its own peak and deserves a Wiki article. Sunayana (talk) 12:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think Floating bridge can be constructed in the same place for 1% of the current cost.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.61.47.6 (talk) 07:38, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Why not floating bridge similar to Dubai and US ?
Talk:Bandstand Promenade

message: I took a 360degree photosphere panorama of bandstand: https://plus.google.com/photos/+AmberJain/albums/6180960733457977313/6180960731013803810?pid=6180960731013803810&oid=100870687320311731094&authkey=CK64k52s-czLHw ... Shall we link this from the article? JainAmber (talk) 13:29, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Bandstand photosphere panorama
Talk:Bangalore City Police

message: Uncharacteristic of WP, extreme choice of words, no citations. Please edit it; I will change it myself within a week. --Sayitaintsojoe (talk) 16:40, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Insufferable prig?

message: I think, we should move this to Bengaluru City Police
--Rsrikanth05 (talk) 16:10, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Kempegowda International Airport

message: Note that I have restored this name per this discussion]. As I noted in my edit summary, this appears to be the most recent talk page discussion and it concluded that this article should be at Bengaluru Airport per WP:AIRPORTNAME and WP:COMMONNAME. This was reverted by a user seemingly unilaterally (I cannot find a discussion). If it should be at Kempegowda International Airport, then there should be a new discussion opened. Avgeekamfot (talk) 14:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Restoration

message: The ownership is wrong I believe.  It is not Fairfax financial. It is Fairfax India holding that owns through another company an majority share. 212.107.146.227 (talk) 23:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: RudolfRed (talk) 00:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 March 2024 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Change back to Kempegowda International Airport (non-admin closure) >>> Extorc.talk 09:35, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Bengaluru Airport →  – This article has gone through a number of move changes but the most recent discussion (seen above) concluded that it should be named  Bengaluru Airport. One editor has unilaterally moved the article to reflect the airport's official name without opening a new discussion which I have undone. However, upon reflection, I feel that the WP:COMMONNAME for this article would be Bangalore Airport. This would reflect the consensus seen at Talk:Bangalore#Requested_move_21_March_2024 that Bangalore is the common name of the city, not Bengaluru. Bangalore is also what major English-speaking international carriers describe the airport as including United  and British Airways . Qantas, meanwhile, feels the need to clarify that Bengaluru is Bangalore using quotations further underlining that Bangalore is more common . 
Additionally, given the consensus for the Bangalore article, having the equivalent name for the airport is supported by WP:CONSISTENT. Avgeekamfot (talk) 11:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 May 2024 

message: Change the title of this 122.171.23.236 (talk) 12:06, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change the title from Bangalore Airport to Kempegowda International Airport Bengaluru (BLR) 

message: Add mention of UNESCO's Prix Versailles 2023 
has recognized it as the 'World's 
most beautiful airport' and was 
awarded the coveted 'World 
Special Prize for an Interior 
2023 CinnamonStew34eh (talk) 07:47, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 31 May 2024
Talk:Bangalore Times

message: The allegation tha tis poorly recieved, is an opinion and can't be substantiated wthout a citation
* added citation need to that. -- Librarianofages 23:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Hi, I've removed this page from the Category, Newspapers published in India as it already belongs to the category The Times of India, which is a subcategory of the first category. --Kunal (Talk) 19:50, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed category
Talk:Bangalore University

message: Hello - I've started copyediting this article.  However, many parts of it are taken almost directly from the university's website.  It needs someone with more direct knowledge than I have to give it a good fact-check, particularly with the numbers.  I also seems that something more substantive could be added about this university, which does have an international reputation.  
Hillbillygirl (talk) 21:26, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit status 

message: Bangalore University has over 500 colleges, and there were only 5 colleges listed. So I have deleted list of colleges section. Should we list all of BU colleges???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sansari13 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of colleges