lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jack's Big Music Show

message: This comment is going to need a reference:  "his show's dry humor and the characters directly addressing the audience bear this out."  Many children's shows have characters directly address the viewers.  (Terryn3 00:10, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment needs a reference 

message: The copyright police have deleted the image for this page, and I can't seem to get it to upload again.  (It's a promotional photo, which is presumed to be fair use under WP:Fair use--but it apparently didn't say that on the image page, which it has to.)  The image file is at http://www.noggin.com/shows/img/pho368x157jacks.jpg ; can anyone more WP tech savvy than I am get it back up and then revert to the old image-bearing page? Nareek 19:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Image 

message: What are Jack and Mary?  They look like dogs, but then have a dog named Mel.  Big mice?
Isn't the Dirty Socks song from Leonard the Country Squirrel called "No Good Reason Party" instead of "...TO Party?" I'm thinking that's what they call it when they show the video between shows, but I could be wrong and wanted to check first.
The little bad wolf in the first episode has got to be Frank Oz, either that or it sounds alot just like him, anyone have any ideas on that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oupioneer (talk • contribs) 14:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He's not Frank Oz, he's Eric Jacobson, who performs Oz's characters (Fozzie Bear, Bert, Grover, etc..) when Oz is unavailable 201.83.145.65 (talk) 02:31, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: Is there any significance to the outfit Jack wears all the time? It looks like a turtleneck with an asterisk on it.  Just wondering if it had anything to do with the music, the beatnik genre, etc.? Or perhaps it is circus clothes for when he takes his trapeze lessons? 173.16.125.178 (talk) 22:47, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jack's outfit 

message: I think the comparison/contrast to Bunnytown should be listed.  Bunnytown is visually the same show, and is made by the same people at the same company.  I came onto wikipedia today to see a section describing the arrangement between the two (whether Nick was making it for Disney, whether Nick was suing Disney over it, whether one was an overt sequel or spin-off of the other, etc.)  Anyone know what's going on?--Mrcolj (talk) 13:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contrast with Bunnytown 

message: I think the descriptions for Nature Cat and Bunnytown Bunny should be improved because of their typography. Does anybody agree? --BooCookie (talk) 16:20, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Descriptions for Nature Cat and Bunnytown Bunny 

message: If anyone is from the UK, did this show air in the UK? If you it did, where did it air and did it use the american dub or a british dub?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.10.219.218 (talk) 11:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did this show air in the UK?
Talk:Chaoboridae

message: Can someone tell me what a cosmopolitan distribution is? --IronChris 00:11, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: See cosmopolitan distribution. --Stemonitis 00:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The antenna picture appears to be of Chironomidae (Orthocladiinae).  Antennae of adult Chaoboridae have distinct rings of hairs. Vox Sciurorum (talk) 01:40, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: For images of Chaoboridae see photo gallery on diptera.info and note wings and venation. --Andreas Plank (talk) 02:40, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Does anyone have a source for Edwards as the authority—particularly in the year 1912? I see citations of his (e.g. "The british species of Chaoborus and Mochlonyx (Diptera, Culicidae)" Ent. mon. Mag. 66:163–165 from 1930) that seem to suggest at least the family Chaoboridae wasn't in use around 1912. If this bibliography is to be trusted, he didn't publish any works in 1912 relevant to the topic, either.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthropoentomophagology (talk • contribs) 06:37, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Edwards is the author, and he described the group originally as tribe Chaoborini in 1932, which was later elevated to family status. I have updated the taxobox per this overview paper.--Kevmin § 17:17, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taxonomic authority 

message: A chaoborus in a human 174.235.52.91 (talk) 18:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human how to kill Chaborus
Talk:Key Stage

message: Some GCSE courses start in year 9, for me it was geography and double science. KS4 starts in part in year 9, and completely in year 10. I think that might be worth mentioning. 2.29.3.160 (talk) 22:04, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year 9 and Key Stage 4 

message: Move Key Stage to key stage. Key stage is not a proper noun.
2A02:C7F:31CF:6400:ACC2:B8DE:54DB:EDF0 (talk) 17:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Rockstar Games Presents Table Tennis

message: Just ran into this source, in case it's worth incorporating:
* 
czar 17:00, 1 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: . – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 13:16, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NYT source 

message: Hello @Spy-cicle and anyone interested. I just started the above article, and per  he may deserve a mention in this article, somewhere, but video games are not really my area. What do you think? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , thanks! – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 13:16, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks ok to me! Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:45, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Cheers, thanks for this. It looks good (funnily enough made my first table tennis player article only a few months ago).  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 20:57, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Rhain and @Spy-cicle, you may or may not find this discussion a little interesting:Talk:Wally_Green_(table_tennis)#Conflict of interest editing Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:46, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wally Green (table tennis)]]
File talk:Macedonia ethnic.png

message: This map is wrong. --Hipi Zhdripi 00:20, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that so? How many maps you saw in your life anyway? Please see one that is 100% same as this one: http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/europe/ethnic_groups_eastern_europe.jpg Map is based on municipality data from 1981 census and this data could be easy checked. Data for Skopje is there given for the entire Skopje administrative area that was not ethnically mixed in 1981 and it is also not mixed now, but have clear ethnic Macedonian majority (as it had in 1981). So, try to check some sources before claiming that something is "fabrication and absolutely biased", ok? PANONIAN (talk) 22:54, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Map

message: For User Objectivee: please stop reverting this map. This is an HISTORICAL map that show situation from 1981. It also show municipal borders from 1981, not the current ones, so:
*1. you cannot impose current data into municipal borders from 1981 because current municipal borders are different.
*2. your claimed "current" ethnic situation is not accurate. Please check the results from last census in Macedonia. Thank you. PANONIAN (talk) 22:11, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverts
Talk:Jesse Dangerously

message: Just revamped the article with a bit more encyclopedic style and removed all the point-form stuff, as well as a few other bits and pieces added in. Tony Fox 00:27, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comment
Talk:The Truth (with Jokes)

message: So who wrote the forward to the book?
  My guess is John Kerry. Just a guess. 66.19.77.51 04:21, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Foreword

message: This article is clearly biased towards Franken. Elephantmaster 02:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: The epilogue is written as a letter to his Grandchildren, Barack, Hillary, and Joe III. Considering that, as of today, these are the names of the top three people in the American Government's Executive Branch, perhaps Franken's prediction list should reflect this? 71.233.230.223 (talk) 04:55, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franken as Secular Prophet 

message: Why does the article state "Franken runs for senate in Minnesota in 2008 and wins. Franken does go on to run for senate against incumbent senator Norm Coleman (R-MN), and after a prolonged legal battle and recount process, the election was resolved in Franken's favor on June 30, 2009."
It was determined that he won.  IMO, "resolved" reads as though he took the election by some means other than by garnering more votes than Coleman.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.80.2.132 (talk) 02:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resolved? 
Talk:Sex & Drugs & Rock & Roll

message: My recollection is that the phrase was already in use around 1970, thus predating the song. Specifically, I seem to recall that it was used on Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In. But I don't have documentation for this. GMcGath 00:30, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Sex and Drugs was most definitely available on New Boots shortly after the albums release, although uncredited on the cover. Copies began to appear within a month or so with it on side 2 - initially French pressings, possibly brought in to cover for the lack of stock when the album took off. Whether the later pressings were UK versions or French I can't remember. My copy is unavailable at the moment, so I can't check whether it was pressed in the UK. I do recall people used to check the track rings to see whether S+D was included, which would indicate it wasn't mentioned on the label, and probably just another Stiff wizard wheeze to sell records. Brieflysentient (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Existence on ''New Boots and Panties''

message: I removed the reference to sales limitations and Stiff's policy as it was conjecture, and incorrect conjecture at that. In fact Stiff struggled to get anything into the charts early on, or even achieve bulk sales figures, simply because a) EMI didn't give a toss about the stuff they distributed but didn't have a clue about, they were barely sold to the music trade as EMI reps had no idea how to deal with them and there were few shops which would stock 'punk' records anyway, so it was not worthy of sales concentration (Stiff was an EMI distributed label then), b) public exposure was minimal other than John Peel and NME (and to a minor extent Melody Maker) - word of mouth was all we had, and don't forget it was 'not suitable for playing on the Beeb', c) the shops that did sell their records weren't chart return shops and d) they sold to a small audience of the early punks and a few savvy people, minimal exposure and not the sort of people who would frequent mainstream chart-return shops. 
Accessibility to stocking in chart-return shops would have immediately at least trebled the stock available from day 1, and in theory sales. Without that option, Stiff's very smart policy under limited options was almost exactly the opposite of what the entry suggests - delete early so purchasing was based on 'get it while you can', and concentrating sales on a critical minimal sales window, to hopefully hit that chart/exposure level that would have increased visibility and pressurised chart return shops to stock it. I'd suggest that without the very deliberate manipulation of punk singles sales information by the BMRB (as disgracefully shown by what happened to God Save the Queen), and the associated deliberate manipulation of the charts and stifling of non-middle of the road shops from the chart return system (later convincingly proven), the situation would have been very different for Stiff and many others. (livid-mode-after-all-these-years OFF) Brieflysentient (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Lack of initial sales
Template talk:Comics by country

message: Nice template. Don't forget :Category:Polish comics, please :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 00:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: DC Thomson isn't in England. Removing England from the box. --Revolt (talk) 18:35, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Law of Cuba

message: This article is not finished & I will be adding a good deal more to it. takethemud 19:47, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is it 1989 or 1899? --Error 00:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Year

message: Cuba is a Communist country, it means that the Party controls the justice. Xx236 10:28, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Party is always right 

message: It seems like the section for "Family Code" on this page is based upon the 1975 Family Code. Cuba has recently passed a new Family Code as of 2022, can we have this section amended to reflect the new changes to the Family Code? Himisuda (talk) 04:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Family Code
Talk:I Was a Teenage Werewolf

message: If "few critics" have drawn any correlation at all between this film and the "Blood of Dracula" film, then shouldn't there really be a reference to one of those few who does? Otherwise, this claim looks like original research. Hierophany 04:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  original research? 
Talk:Steve Physioc

message: I just had a question about last nights Angels,Rangers game. How was the play scored that won the game? Kennedy drove in the tying run, but Istures was held at third until the Ranger player booted the ball. He then came in to score and win the game. Did Kennedy get credit for two RBI's or just one?
I can be reached at splithapns@aol.com. Thanks!
HI  ! I am a friend of Steve & Stacey Physioc and wanted everyone to know what wonderful caring,and giving people they are !  They both work towards making the Kid Singers of Anaheim an organization that helps underprivileged children....Stacey on the Benefit each year and with Kid Singers in general in various ways, Steve also, and he is their primary spokesperson !! Thank you both !    Lorie Kelly  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.235.221.5 (talk) 06:47, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tippett Studio

message: Shouldn't we put a link to every of those movies? paat 00:41, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link

message: this "article" reads like it was written by Tippett's press department.  Anyone feel like tackling the job? SpikeJones 18:13, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup, please.  Reads like a press release
Talk:Experimental physics

message: :The following highlights current issues. Feel free to either add the issues you've identified, or to strike them as they've been resolved.
WikiProject Physics' Reviewing Cheatsheet (11:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviewing Cheatsheet

message: I am completely at a loss as to what we should say in this article.  The subject is mind-bogglingly broad, and in some sense cuts sideways through more standard ways of organizing physics.  Thast is to say, an "experimental particle physicist" is much more a type of "particle physicist" than a type of "experimental physicist."  The roles, tasks, and organization of experimentalists are very different in different subfields.  That being the case, what should this article say? -- SCZenz 01:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Content

message: I've added an overview of experimental physics. That ought to give a starting point for things. Headbomb (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think organising the information is a good approach. Can you structure the lists in the end, i.e. famous experiments and methods (into subfieds of physics) as well as famous experimentalists (into eras or also subfields of physics) 2001:9E8:2741:F400:29DC:8253:D3FD:64E4 (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Overview

message: My Science topic this quarter is physics. :I was given a golf ball, cup, rubberband, candle and a match. I was told that the gofball must reach the cup after the candle has blown out. Can any one help me? I tried everything! Frustrated in MD.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.17.102.83 (talk) 16:20, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  School Experiment for 8th grade need help 

message: I don’t know 105.112.18.24 (talk) 13:35, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How experimental physics is a way to scientifically test theoretical explanation
Talk:The Great Buck Howard

message: Infobox tag has been removed as article already has one.  If you have any problems with this please post a message on my talk page. RWardy 09:07, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Tag

message: I don't know if this is worthy of mention in the article or not, but there's a simple solution to how Buck Howard performed his "Money Finding" act. Since it's such a point of interest in the story, to the point that characters try to deduce how he did it, I thought it was worth mentioning here. Buck Howard 'reads' people, knows how folks' minds work, etc. If you watch the film, you'll noticed that each person who has his money is featured in the foreground at some point... looking forward, toward the stage... not at Buck Howard. Thusly, he chooses someone who's trying not to look at him, someone who's trying TOO hard to be casual. When he plays Vegas, the reason he cannot perform the "Money Finding" act is because the entire audience is sitting at round tables. Thusly, he realizes that he cannot possibly deduce which person is looking away, looking forward, etc. He has essentially gone from a predictable setting with rows of forward-facing audience members... to the chaos of circular seating and audience members facing in random directions. This makes his trick impossible to perform correctly. Just thought it was worth noting that Buck Howard is probably intended to be a bit Obsessive-Compulsive (just my opinion) and this is the culmination of the character being thrown into unpredictable situations - the random-facing audience being the ultimate destruction of his life's routine. -- 4.153.80.154 (talk) 04:25, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buck's "Find the Money" Trick... 
Talk:Hachimaki

message: Maikel (talk) 17:33, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What about the shiru saji?

message: I got rid of the "rolling up one sleeves" comment at the bottom, it didn't have a citation, and it was unnecessary, or at least it needed a better analogy. If a Japanese citizen put on a head band to signal they were getting ready to work, I'm sure there is something of similar quality in Western culture where we put on an article of clothing to mean the same thing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.62.111.209 (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted Citation less "Fact"
Talk:Long Gone John

message: Press-kit-ese should be edited to NPOV.--Larrybob 00:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree; this reads like an ad. 86.161.30.123 (talk) 02:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Long Gone John (From Bowling Green) is a reasonably well-known song by W.C. Handy. I'm not sure if that should be mentioned in the article, or the right format for doing it, though.Sjö (talk) 20:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: See also?
Talk:Yokozuna

message: In the Trivia section, it states that Although the WWE wrestler known as Yokozuna was never a sumo wrestler, his manager, Mr. Fuji was in fact a former Yokozuna. There is no mention of a sumo career in the article for Mr. Fuji, and being foreign-born, wouldn't it be highly unlikely he would be accorded this rank, even if he was a sumotori? --Enigmatick 19:54, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr. Fuji? 

message: When is it appropriate to capitalize "yokozuna" and "ozeki"? The capitalization on this page is inconsistent. Could we use rules similar to those for other ranks, where it is capitalized in conjunction with the name of an individual (their title), but not capitalized when not referring to a specific person? e.g., "President Roosevelt is considered to be one of the finest American presidents." --Country Wife 18:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Dragnet (1987 film)

message: I believe the porn tycoon is much more a portayal of Larry Flynt than Hugh Hefner, and I've changed it as such. Bantosh 14:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hugh Hefner?

message: the comment that as of 2007 this the last film where hanks was a lead and didn't get top billing is incorrect.  he's second-billed to leonardo dicaprio in CATCH ME IF YOU CAN.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Citizenjamesford (talk • contribs) 19:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom Hanks Top Billing? 

message: Needs to be known.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:4000:62E0:415C:E582:A79E:5F19 (talk) 20:43, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added propaganda  

message: Near the end of the movie, after Whirley's Learjet is forced to land by the LAPD T-38 Talon, when Friday walks up to the virgin Connie, behind her you can see a tri-tailed Lockheed Constellation, lovingly referred to as a "Connie". (I can't believe this was pure serendipity!) Glf01 (talk) 22:44, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aircraft
Talk:Catherine Clark (broadcaster)

message: "sex kitten?"
I wouldn't use that phrase, myself, but she is extremely attractive.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.147.130.17 (talk) 22:31, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Clark, Mulroney and Alexandre Trudeau all made TV or films in the 2000s. Justin Trudeau was a public figure maybe but not a media personality, and is now a politician. Suggest delete his name from this list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.99.133.32 (talk) 19:47, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Media personalities?
Talk:Paharganj

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 13:36, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Jamie Uys

message: In the list of Uys' films, Lost in the Desert was dated 1971 until just now; but this appears to be incorrect, and I have changed it to fit with the incomplete information I have about the date of this film.
Information about this now very obscure film is quite hard to come by; but, as far as I can make out, the Afrikaans version was titled "Dirkie" and came out in 1969, and the English version was titled either "Dirkie Lost in the Desert" or "Lost in the Desert" and came out at least in Australia in 1970; so far, however, I've not been able to find out what year it came out in English in countries other than Australia.
I will update the article further if I find out; but I also request anyone who has definite information to supply it, please.  I've created an article on "Lost in the Desert", a film I remember fondly from my childhood and have an interest in. M.J.E. 10:20, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lost in the Desert: uncertainty and incomplete data about date

message: The article goes into unnecesary detail (eg, that Uys lived in an A-frame, and his complete eddress!)
Although Beautiful People is supposedly a 'documentary' the 'famous' marula scene(s) was/ were staged! It would take a lot of marula to get an elephant drunk! Also, not all the species of animals seen falling about are species that would consume fruit. There is a clear difference in terrain between where the marula trees are and where the animals are bumbling about.
--Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 21:10, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article does not comply with guidelines & marula scene  

message: If you ever watched All the Way To Paris (it's on Youtube btw) the first thing you see in the opening credits is this caption: A Jamie Uys (pronounced 'ice') then some time later the same thing is repeated again. That probably means the pronounciation should be changed to  /aɪs/. I think he knew how to say his own last name after all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilya-42 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  his last name pronunciation