Wikipedia talk:Deleted articles with freaky titles

message: Not sure why, when I made portals into its own section in the TOC, the Wikipedia pages link stopped working. More than likely I did something to screw up the template, goodness knows I'm prone to doing that, so someone who knows what they're doing might want to have a look and see if they can fix whatever it is that's going on. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 06:32, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem was that  only supported five custom sections. I've added a sixth one, but managed to mess it up along the way ... oops! Graham87 14:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it looks better to me now. Thank you! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:36, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  TOC 

message: Is it okay to add articles that were merged rather than deleted? Because I think  Squirrel attacks is an appropriate title for this page. 169.228.147.248 (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Naaaaah ... "MAFT" or "DMAFT" don't quite have the same ring to them. Besides, we already have a link to Koala attacks in Australia. Graham87 01:42, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged articles? 

message: This was removed from the page  in November 2017 for being both not freaky (it's a reference to a meme) and transphobic (for obvious reasons, before being readded with the justification that an article on a random meme was freaky enough, and also for being in 'good humour'. In other words, 'just a joke'. I have now removed it again because a) a random meme is not noteworthy, but also not really 'freaky' if you know the context and b) Transphobia is not 'good humour'. It's easy for the editor who restored the page to this list to say that as (I assume) a cis person, but this meme was literally created with the intention of mocking trans people, so is offensive regardless of it being 'just a joke' --217.42.24.158 (talk) 19:53, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Causing offense isn't a valid reason to delete content (Wikipedia is not censored). That said, I don't think it's funny or "freaky" enough to belong here. So I'd say just leave it out. §pur§y§ituation§ (talk) 12:51, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did you just assume my gender? (or, How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Outdated Transphobic Memes) 

message: Several pages were removed lately from this list because they were deleted as vandalism (G3 or G10), with the stated goal of avoiding encouragement of vandalism. However most of these pages were created years ago, and the likely vandals who created them have long since moved on and forgotten about them (if not left Wikipedia entirely), with very few exceptions. So I think maybe we should prohibit only recent (past year or so) vandalism on this page, since that should achieve the goal without necessitating deletion of perfectly good titles. And some of the pages removed (e.g. "The belief that a cosmic jewish (sic) zombie who was his own father..." that redirected to Christianity) just ought to be kept here, vandalism or not. §pur§y§ituation§ (talk) 12:30, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should favour denying recognition of vandalism, just like the rest of the project does. Some vandals have very long memories. Graham87 04:58, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, I wouldn't worry about that too much. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:16, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent removal of "vandalism" titles 

message: I was one of the first banned from Wikipedia for writing an article on homemade LSD, involving bleach and ammonia. Is there anyway I can see that deleted article? This was probably early 2001. Not looking to fuck with anyone, just curious. I thought an encyclopedia anyone could edit was an insane idea at the time. Supernauttroaghway (talk) 02:14, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If you remember its title, I might be able to find a record of it somewhere. Graham87 03:06, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

text: @Graham87 pretty sure it was just "Homemade LSD" Supernauttroaghway (talk) 13:51, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Graham87 Supernauttroaghway (talk) 13:54, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  I can't find any records about it, but history from 2001 can be very spotty on Wikipedia. By the way, to ping a user, use the template  like "" (without the quotes). Graham87 14:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super early articles 

message: I just wanna ask if I can add to this page, that's all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThisIsHowIAm (talk • contribs) 17:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , what article do you want to add? Ionmars10 (talk) 18:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

text: , I wanted to add an article named Naked grout, but it has no articles for deletion discussion, and it was deleted in 2021. I fount it in the new deletion log (Special:Log/delete). ThisIsHowIAm (talk) 18:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just added it to the list. Ionmars10 (talk) 19:10, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can I add to this page? 

message: I don't know if this is worth mentioning at all, but dopigslayeggs was a reference to this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ztc3Pnl6BQk, where they make a joke about going to the URL in question and finding that it just says "no".
SomnoticAgama (talk) 20:04, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Meh, I've added it, just because the Youtuber in question, Joseph Garrett, has an article here. Graham87 02:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dopigslayeggs 

message: As a War Thunder player, this is hilarious. To sum it up, people believe that Soviet (or russian) tanks and air craft perform better and have more durability than any other countries aircraft/tank lineup.
I play Sweden, and have no problem against Soviet aircraft.
This entire page is amazing. Smotoe (talk) 15:27, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Draft:The russian bias in war thunder [1,625]" 

message: Hello, I would like to nominate this deleted page for the deleted articles with freaky titles page, It should be noted that this page was a moving of the Eurovision 2023 wikipedia page with the memo line: "Rigged."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurovision_Song_Contest_2023:_CHA_CHA_CHA OrlandoApollosFan69 (talk) 00:33, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, it was deleted as blatant vandalism and as the header at the top of the page says, we don't include such entries. Graham87 08:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  CHA CHA CHA 

message: The title Sextuple-glazed windows, which I found divulging through RfD, could be considered freaky enough to go here, but is it one of the many thousands of X1/Neelix redirects. The creator of them were subject to topic bans, ANI and briefly ArbCom over them (the user's current block for sockpuppetry is unrelated), and they are considered problematic editing, but not vandalism, so are they okay to be mentioned in this list? Xeroctic (talk) 11:56, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say not, and I would've said the same even before he was banned; we shouldn't glorify his work. Graham87 (talk) 13:25, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neelix redirects 

message: PLease add it to AfD or remove it from DAFT cuz someone created that draft again 24.115.255.37 (talk) 02:53, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft:A]] got created again 

message: Recently, @SomeoneIguess added a few deleted drafts consisting only of Chinese characters in their names. Some of them exist in mainspace as legitimate disambiguations (e.g. 圓) or redirects, the characters' meanings are not always going to be freaky, and due to the sheer number of them implied to have been deleted from draftspace, the ones listed there are only a small amount of them. Are they 'freaky' enough to be listed?
I'm discussing it here instead of removing them outright as there are quite a couple of them, they have only just been added. and their removal may seem quite major. Xeroctic (talk) 21:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, I have No Objection to the removals. I'm not really too concerned  about what I add staying or not - Someone, i guess(talk i guess|le edit list)  00:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese character drafts 

message: there's a video where he covers this page, should it be mentioned somewhere?
im at school, the vids blocked, but it covers this page 13 Rats (talk) 13:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  JT Sexkik 

message: "originally released in 2009" -Minecraft 24.115.255.37 (talk) 22:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated the comment about 'Draft:Minecraft is old' in question. Xeroctic (talk) 15:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minecraft is 15 years old 

message: This
(Article content was a complaint that anonymous IPs can create talk pages but not articles) 24.115.255.37 (talk) 19:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That titles seems too vandalism-like, so I don't think it should be added. Xeroctic (talk) 19:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: But it was deleted as a G8, not G3, 5, or 10 24.115.255.37 (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The page instructions state that pages should be excluded if it is "clearly and unquestionably the work of a vandal" or speedy deleted by certain criteria. Despite the title being deleted as a G8, it looks like vandalism and therefore it can be excluded. Xeroctic (talk) 19:30, 21 May 2024 (UTC)

text: “That titles” lol 24.115.255.37 (talk) 19:46, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here’s a good one I found recently