Talk:Liverpool F.C./Archive 2

message: Sorry, I'm new around here. How do you cite sources for home/away kits? X.qz 08:59, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a website showing the design of the new kits? I reverted the changes made yesterday that show a black away kit. I haven't seen this anywhere, despite a fairly thorough google search. Stu ’Bout ye! 09:53, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah that was me, I forgot to sign in =)The away kit should be white with some red stripes, and the home kit almost pure red. I was actually editing from experience, but i found some websites for citation of sources: Home Kit and Away Kit The sources are from liverpoolfc.tv, the official site, so it's reliable. -X.qz 11:04, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Update: I figured I'll go ahead and make the change to the kit since I now have concrete references to back me up. Can somebody who knows how cite the above sources for me? Thanks! -x.qz 11:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  No need to cite those references in the article. They're here if anyone needs them. I removed the red sides of the away kit though.  Seems that red shoulders would be more proper. – Elisson • Talk 12:12, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Apropos of nothing, fairly reliable sources (though not quite reliable enough for Wikipedia) say the new kits will look a lot like the adidas uniforms worn in the World Cup - think the French jersey, but all red and white trims. Now, the away jersey will be all-yellow for domestic matches (same design as home, but red trims) and the white/green number (seen against Wrexham) for Europea matches. I'm assuming the domestic away kit will be shown in the article (once the new designs are officially unveiled, of course)? Ytny 16:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, given that the green/white European kit has been confirmed, I think it's safe to assume that the other images that were in the same style (i.e. the "catalogue"-style drawings) will prove to be accurate as well, i.e. a yellow away kit with red trim. However, there's no real rush to get the kits on the WP entry until they're unveiled - at which point you can bet it'll be changed within minutes of the announcement! I'm betting they'll keep us waiting with the away kit, though - both the upcoming friendlies are away to teams who play in red (Crewe and Kaiserslautern), but I'd hazard a guess they'll continue to wear the European shirt for those... Seb Patrick 22:18, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting Kits 

message: Could people please stop adding transfers until they're confirmed by the club? While the Echo has reported that the signing of Aurelio tomorrow is a near-certainty, he has not signed yet, and so listing him as a member of Liverpool's squad compromises the accuracy of Wikipedia. Deals can fall through at the last minute - we all remember the pictures of Lee Bowyer at Melwood, I'm sure (Phil Thompson's autobiography says they even had shirts printed for him for a tour they were going on) - and the only confirmed transfers in so far this summer are Paletta and Bellamy. This goes for transfers out, too - can people please stop putting that Cisse has gone on loan to Marseille when he has done nothing of the sort? Seb Patrick 09:12, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I knew we'd get people adding Pennant before it was officially confirmed... hopefully they'll confirm it today so we don't need to spent too long being vigilant! ;-) Seb Patrick 13:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: lol/sigh... aLii 13:58, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transfers 

message: Reference for this? Is it really necessary?
: I have removed the Scottish connection assertion in the lead as a cliam unsupported by facts.  The cited reference  only mention about this once, and far from the extent as was previously asserted in the lead.  By the way, please sign your posts on talk pages.  --Pkchan 16:14, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh aye, Hall, Keegan, Crazy Horse, Smith, Thommo, Case, Fairclough, Lee, Cally, Clemence, Neil, Heighway, Hunt, Rushie, Barnes etc, all from the east end of Glasgow - lol! Vera, Chuck & Dave 17:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I certainly can't see a St Andrew's cross on our club crest - can anyone else, or am I colour blind? I don't think I'd fail to see a white cross on a blue background, I'm a highly trained Firefighter. Cheers. Vera, Chuck & Dave 16:10, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I have removed the Celtic connection which was entered by 58.84.64.8 as this is already mentioned under "Club Culture". -- Alias Flood 15:27, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the reference all together. We don't have "traditionally had a close connection to the Scottish team Celtic". --Leipzigger98 10:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Scottish Connection

message: It would be a good idea to to add players that have gone Liverpool ---> Everton. And also Everton ---> Liverpool.
:That move doesn't involve crossing the Mersey but Stanley Park.  Not a bad idea though.  Audioweevil 02:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Players that have crossed the Mersey

message: The Good article nomination for  has failed
:(My biggest objection here is the prose. It seems so unencyclopedic, it sounds as if a fan wrote it. Fans of stuff probably write 95% of everything on Wikipedia but it shouldn't sound like it. Titles like "Brief but Glorious," and text like "Liverpool have had some glorious moments during the years that followed the 1990 title glory, but life at Anfield has never been the same without the championship trophy in the club's boardroom." It also makes slightly point of view assertions through the use of weasel words i.e. "...Alan Hansen and arguably the greatest player to ever wear Liverpool colours, Kenny Dalglish who is also a Celtic legend."
:A smaller thing is "necessary technical terms or jargon are briefly explained in the article itself, or an active link is provided," I'm still wondering what exactly is the milk cup and who exactly "The Reds" are.)
 TonyJoe 01:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started to address these problems. I've hopefully removed a lot of the POV. I also changed Milk Cup to League Cup to avoid confusion. Stu ’Bout ye! 08:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed further POV headings that were added today. Stu ’Bout ye! 17:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Good articles|Good Article]] [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|nomination]] has failed 

message: Think we need to consider what constitutes 'notable'.. Are John Scales and Oyvind Leonhardson notable former players? I would like to trim this down a bit but curious to see what others think.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Slick Beef (talk • contribs).
: For your reference, Arsenal F.C. adopts the criteria of >100 appearances in the "Famous players" section.  I think the same criterion can be adopted here.  --Pkchan 12:59, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree with that. At the moment the list is POV. -- Alias Flood 14:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  >100 appearences seems sensible. I'll work on that a bit when I get a chance. Thanks for the feedback Slick Beef 21:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Former Players 

message: Someone's just removed Erik Meijer from the "notable players" section. I don't inherently disagree with this edit, and so I've held back on reverting it, but I will just point out that LFC.tv are currently running a fan-voted feature called 100 Players Who Shook The Kop, and Meijer made it in. I know he didn't make many appearances, and I also know that having 100+ players in the "notable" list would be excessive, but even so... do we reckon that 100PWSTK is a sufficient criterion for inclusion, or not? Seb Patrick 09:29, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally I don't think it is. If Meier had been a Liverpool player 50 years ago he would have never made this list. The fact that he is a more recent player does not make him more historically notable in my eyes. aLii 09:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

text: He started just 10 games. While he may have been a cult hero of sorts, he had no impact on Liverpool's history. He doesn't fit the criteria given for List of Liverpool F.C. players, never mind this page. Oldelpaso 17:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Meijer

message: Why are the notes not sequentially numbered? There appears to be a "Paisley" note while all the rest are numeric.Barfbagger 09:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Anyone have a source on his transfer? Liverpoolfc.tv haven't confirmed it. ArtVandelay13 19:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A number of online forums have stated that he has gone to Deportivo which I expect will happen but as we do not yet have a reliable source, I have re-added him. Alias Flood 19:28, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antonio Barragán 

message: Ok, so I decided to have a go at tidying the overly-large history section. It still looks a bit too long — any ideas on what else can be cut? Note there is a huge History of Liverpool Football Club article. aLii 20:23, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mazito seems rather adamant on changing this page to include the entire history that is currently in History of Liverpool Football Club. I don't personally agree with all of his other edits either, but I've reverted enough for one hour. Could some regular editors please comment on this as there has never been much of a discussion (looking through the archives). My opinion is that the Liverpool F.C. page should contain an overview, and History of Liverpool Football Club should be comprehensive. aLii 22:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Note the precedents:
*Arsenal F.C. and History of Arsenal F.C.
*Manchester United F.C. and
**Manchester United pre-1945
**Manchester United 1945-1969
**Manchester United 1969-1986, etc...
aLii 22:50, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Arsenal F.C. article has attained Featured Article Status and closely adheres to Template F.C.. This article should do the same in order that it may attain that same status. -- Alias Flood 02:22, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

text: As I've mentioned in response to your comment on my talk page, I've clocked the amount of time that elapses between the goals by studying the footage, and while it doesn't reach seven minutes (it's just short of 6:50), it's still surely closer to seven than six. Certainly, if you say the goals happened "in six minutes", the implication is that it's under six. They happened within seven minutes. Seb Patrick 18:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: As photos of the new home and away kits have been leaked, is it the appropriate time to update the images of Liverpool's strip, specifically the home, as we'll be wearing yellow this season rather than white.--GoHawks4 07:57, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All that's been leaked, though, are some images from an adidas catalogue. I have no doubt that the images are genuine (I hope they are, as the white/green European away kit is gorgeous, and I want one), but with so many fakes and so much speculation around, Wikipedia's not really the place to update with possible kits. It's always best in situations like that to wait until the official site unveils the kits, and I'm afraid that means waiting until next month... Seb Patrick 08:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough.--GoHawks4 02:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kits 

message: I know it's not this article, but I've improved the list of players in the style of the Arsenal one, but I'll need help in creating articles to kill the redlinks. So, if anyone wants to have a go http://www.lfchistory.net is a good source of info. 
P.S. I wonder if it removes the needs for the slightly ugly List of notable players table on the main article ArtVandelay13 18:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of players 

message: As it's that time of year there is the potential for a lot of flux within the official squad numbers. Over the past few weeks all of the new signings have  been given squad numbers here, which have then been blanked by people like me. Today I notice that liverpoolfc.tv have given Craig Bellamy a squad number of 17, while the others are still numberless. But then there is this forum post by one of the liverpoolfc.tv administrators, effectively saying that any assigned numbers for today's friendly are still not yet official.
I guess if their squad page shows a squad number then it's official enough for us here. Opinions? aLii 09:26, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that Bellamy's number has been fixed at 17 having seen  this but I would not risk buying a numbered shirt for any player until I see an announcement at lfc.tv for the officially fixed squad numbers. I think that we should continue with similar caution here. After all, it is most unlikely that Gabriel Paletta will retain his # 87 as listed here. -- Alias Flood 15:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Squad numbers