Talk:Living Laser

message: "Recently after returning to earth, Tony Stark offered to cure him, by removing his powers, but it went horribly wrong."
Care to expand on that??? 66.167.147.162 05:35, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand, please 

message: The whole "third party" claim was shot down in two separate discussions here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Melter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ego_the_Living_Planet
As for in-universe, in a FCB that is fine. A PH could be added that is out of universe, but I have to say (being the one to rewrite the article and get to it to something resembling encyclopedia-class), that most of it is very clinical, sourced and has the appropriate links. Not even close to being as fannish as some of the other efforts out there. Up for comment.
Asgardian (talk) 04:36, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you'll find that the article is better written than most, and I'd like someone to show me a strong out of universe article. Hard to do given this is fiction. The Powers section is also unsourced in the majority of the articles. That will remain the case until some conscientious soul can source abilities via the comics (as publications such as The Official Handbook of the Marvel Universe are incorrect and subjective). Big ask.
Asgardian (talk) 19:55, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

text: The CM article is not bad, but has some POV and colloquial speak. Asgardian (talk) 01:26, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What do POV or colloquialisms have to do with in-universe or out-universe? And btw, thank you for finally putting your signature right after the end of your post. It makes the thread much easier to read. :-) Nightscream (talk) 04:21, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  This article is a dog. I've had an attempt at clean-up but there is nothing to work with, it's just plot summary and more plot summary. How this article will be developed further in line with the MOS is beyond me. --Cameron Scott (talk) 10:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

text: I 've had to take a technical brush to your edits, but it now looks pretty solid. Unfortunately with C-grade characters it is simply a case of tell the story, but nothing can be done. Tags removed as no longer necessary. Hopefully that will that - far too much attention to a very minor article. Asgardian (talk) 13:44, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good clean-up but the primary source tag stands until that problem is fixed. If it cannot be fixed, the article should be merged somewhere or deleted. --Cameron Scott (talk) 14:08, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

text: All covered here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Melter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ego_the_Living_Planet
Asgardian (talk) 14:47, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 

message: He does this in the Iron Man TV series, but I don't see a reference anywhere. Haven't read the comics in which he appeared, so is he ever capable of flight? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Marvel Comics characters who can fly]] 

message: I thought I'd add my two cents on the whole situation going on right now. Speaking as not only a comic book fan, but a Wikipedia reader, the current way this article looks is horrible, and it looks like a mess. Imagine a normal person accessing the article, who wanted to find out more information on Living Laser. Do you think they would find this article easy to read? There are numbers and numbers and numbers EVERYWHERE. What was wrong with the old way to cite comic books? Why do they have to be named in the article? All it does it make it look like a horribly dis-organized mess, sloppy and hard to read. This article went from looking like it belonged on Wikipedia to belonging on a fansite, with how the references are placed throughout the article inside the article itself. Isn't there a better way to do this than just sloppily placing them into the article itself? CarpetCrawler (talk) 15:54, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, but we are currently managing a somewhat difficult user who is very blunt. More discussion is required, but I am confident it will pass. Asgardian (talk) 05:27, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Yes. I am sure I've mentioned this elsewhere but we do need to try and footnote as many of the primary references as possible because, as we can see here, it really disrupts the flow of the article. (Emperor (talk) 21:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: My two cents

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Living Laser. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160419071717/https://marvelavengersalliance2.com/aa2_characters/living-laser/ to https://marvelavengersalliance2.com/aa2_characters/living-laser/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)