Talk:Public goods game

message: I have found one article that refers to this class of game in the singular:  "public good games".     Perhaps this singular  form, and the abbreviation PGG, should redirect to this entry.   I'm not sure how to set up such an alias, or I'd do it myself.  --pohl (talk) 14:58, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

message: If it is mentioned "Researchers running the game multiply the number of tokens in the pot before it is distributed to encourage contribution", then I believe there is a restriction such that the multiplier has to be less than the number of players in order for the Nash equilibrium to hold (otherwise contributing 1 dollar gets you more than 1 dollar back even after the split, so then the Nash equilibrium would be everyone contributing all the money)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by K61824 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restrictions? 

message: Would this be a good website to include? The statistics page might be interesting.
Alemaaltevinden (talk) 16:09, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  http://thepublicshare.com/ 

message: Dr. Bayer has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
Dr. Bayer has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:
*Reference : Ralph-C Bayer & Elke Renner & Rupert Sausgruber, 2010. "Confusion and Learning in the Public Goods Game," School of Economics Working Papers 2010-24, University of Adelaide, School of Economics.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 02:39, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Bayer's comment on this article 

message: Dr. Kamei has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Kamei has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Kenju Kamei & Louis Putterman, 2013. "Play it Again: Partner Choice, Reputation Building and Learning in Restarting, Finitely-Repeated Dilemma Games," Working Papers 2013-8, Brown University, Department of Economics.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 18:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Kamei's comment on this article 

message: Dr. Migheli has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Migheli has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Lotito, Gianna & Migheli, Matteo & Ortona, Guido, 2011. "Is cooperation instinctive? Evidence from the response times in a Public Goods Game," POLIS Working Papers 161, Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice - POLIS.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 16:14, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Migheli's comment on this article 

message: Dr. Guillen has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Guillen has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Pablo Guillen & Danielle Merrett, 2010. "Efficient inter-group competition and the provision of public goods," ThE Papers 10/03, Department of Economic Theory and Economic History of the University of Granada..
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 16:17, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Guillen's comment on this article 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.1102493108 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960077922009262. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 15:20, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed