lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Touch Me (The Doors song)

message: Article says Ray Manzeric says this, then later makes the claim that Jim Morrison said it... which one was it on the recording?
L. Greg 17:29, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article tells us that Morrison says, "Stronger than dirt," but the voice does sound different from his voice in the rest of the song. —69.242.86.214 15:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Jim Morrison is dead, so Flats must've kicked his butt real good! --Mark Lessig (talk) 14:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who says "Stronger than dirt"? 

message: are there any more similar kind of songs with same classical music arrangement?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.97.8.68 (talk) 23:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article says Robby Krieger's black eye was a result of a fight with Jim Morrison.  Jon Densmore says in an interview on YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ByMWIiiX5ko) that this is not true and he got it an a car accident.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.156.154.227 (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Robby Krieger's eye

message: My understanding is that with personnel credits, the Additional personnel lists don't need to be featured ToC sections, so I edited that accordingly, with  what I believed was a valid edit summary. But it looks like  reverted my good faith edit without an edit summary, when anti-vandal tools such as Twinkle, Huggle and Rollback shouldn't be used to undo good faith edits without an appropriate edit summary, per WP:TWABUSE--73.128.144.218 (talk) 21:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personnel: Featured ToC sections vs pseudoheadings  

message: * US: Gold (physical) 1,000,000 unit not 500,000
https://download2280.mediafire.com/cabvy36of4wg/7p1dpyuahgou0sj/The+Doors%5C%27+Certified+Sales.doc  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.46.35.249 (talk) 08:27, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Touch Me single
Talk:I Want Your Sex

message: Just wondered if it is OK to link to copyrighted materials hosted on third party sites like You Tube.  Many pages on WP do this but I seemed to remember reading that it isn't allowed.
Lanzarotemaps (talk) 00:42, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright ? 

message: I was listening to Sirius XM's "80s on 8" replay of American Top 40. This week's episode, which originally aired July 4, 1987, had "I Want Your Sex" at #21 that week, and Casey Kasem clearly did announce the title before going into and out of the song, which would contradict the statement that Casey "refused" to announce the title on air. I very much doubt that the song was somehow dubbed in after the fact. Therefore, I have flagged the segment for fact-checking. Route56 (talk) 01:50, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[American Top 40]] 

message: I read Michael dedicated the first months of 1987 to plan his album shortly after Wham! disbanding. I thought he dedicated the last months of 1986 to collaborate with Aretha Franklin in that song released in January 1987. Was there a reference? Francodamned (talk) 19:29, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recorded in 1986? 
Talk:One More Try (George Michael song)

message: Has anyone noticed that the music video doesn't have the soft cymbals in the background compared to the album version? Night Tracks (talk) 03:46, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music video version vs. album version 
Talk:Outside (George Michael song)

message: To whoever wrote that description - I think you're missing another little (hilarious) reference being made with the "I'd service the community..." line.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.138.235.243 (talk) 00:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

message: The English translation of the Swedish voice-over isn't "rough" at all - it's completely accurate.188.230.248.85 (talk) 15:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I have adjusted that, although a reliable source would be nice. Swedish is a widely-spoken language and there is no reason to doubt Google Translate. Martinevans123 (talk) 17:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "roughly translates to" 

message: Surely "Huu Jarss" is "huge arse" rather than "Who cares"? Mwphil (talk) 03:26, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  translation of "Huu Jarss"
Talk:G.992.5 Annex M

message: The page current states (of ADSL2+) : "This extends the capability of basic ADSL by doubling the number of downstream bits."
ADSL is 8Mb/s.  Double this is 16Mb/s, but ADSL2+ is 24Mb/s
Now, ADSL2 is 12Mb/s, double this and you get 24Mb/s which is ADSL2+
Should the above quote actually read "extends the capability of basic *ADSL2*..."?
(Some unsigned statement above)
----
The page currently states (of PowerTel ADSL2+ Annex M coverage):
"Australian wholesale business grade ISP Powertel (http://www.powertel.com.au/) established a relationship with iiNet (http://www.iinet.net.au) and now offers SHDSL services up to 2M/2Mbps using Annex M via iiNet DSLAMs."
I believe this is not the case, and in any case is not substantiated with a quote.  Additionally, SHDSL is a very different service to ADSL2+ Annex M.  Furthermore, PowerTel had these facilities in place before their relationship with iiNet; I believe that their SHDSL services are provisioned over their own equipment.  Accordingly, I have deleted this statement.
123.243.255.113 (talk) 14:01, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It borrows part of the frequency spectrum that would have been used for downstream for the upstream.  Assuming all else is equal you would expect the downstream to be reduced by the same amount as the upstream is boosted eg if upstream goes up by 1mbit then downstream will go down by 1mbit.  However for various reasons the loss in downstream may be different to the gain in upstream (often lower).  It would be too simplistic to say it's equal.  mmj (talk) 05:24, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Actual experience disagrees with proposed results. Annex M was supposed to change my 18/1 to 16.5/2.5 according to the official info. Well, I get 12/2, -6dl for 1ul - better than nothing, but someone should be testing and rewriting the spec.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PcGnome (talk • contribs) 19:23, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reality does not agree with promise
Category talk:Muhajir Wikipedians

message: What is this ugly (no offense intended) clutter on this category page? Can we reduce the number of stuff on it and rearrange the rest in a less painful way? Aditya Kabir 17:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup please 

message: I feel people will find the Urdu-speaking community of Pakistan (the ex-Mohajirs as they are now proper Pakistanis) being grouped together with the MQM as rather controversial given the party's rather dodgy and sometimes violent tendencies. I suggest removing the MQM flag and replacing it with just Pakistan's.Suprah™ 10:30, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MQM flag
Talk:Advocates for Children in Therapy

message: I have put in ACT's defining characteristics. This may seem rather detailed for such a small topic, but it may resolve any arguments about what ACT do or do not say attachment therapy is.Fainites barley 14:00, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition 

message: I believe this is relevant as it shows that certain aspects of ACT's approach may fall outside guidelines devised by the EFF and others.
Didacticderivative (talk) 22:19, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of ACT-Friendly WordPress Blogs 

message: I understand this is not an "attack ACT" article.
There are several valid reasons to include this information.
1) Credentials/backgrounds of ACT members has been raised before. This gives some insight into Mr. Sarner, who has been described as a "mathematician and cryptographer"; his voting machine project work, documented by court cases and patents, sheds some light.
2) It provides context for evaluating statements made by ACT.
3) I would agree that if Mr. Sarner had his own wiki, this discussion could be moved there. 
4) This provides a balanced view of ACT.
Didacticderivative (talk) 22:19, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of Larry Sarner and Linda Rosa's Litigation 

message: A user active on this article, Argon&Helium, looks to have been banned as a sock puppet in a long-term abuse case. The edits I undid a few days ago seemed pretty pernicious, so I guess it's not a surprise that it's not the first time the same stuff has been added:
*Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DPeterson/Archive
*Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/DPeterson
Accordingly, I have removed the content added by this user. Regardless, this is not an area of expertise for me, so if there's consensus that parts of the user's contributions were productive, feel free to add them back in. --— Rhododendrites talk |  19:37, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed contributions of a sock 
Talk:What Did He Say?

message: Is there really any reason on a music album stub to list this:
*Futch - Swinging ride symbol ??? What IS that, and does it belong? Also someone named Cherokee is listed as providing backing vocals. I looked on the disambiguation page and find no mention at all of her/him. --leahtwosaints (talk) 21:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions
Talk:Slang dictionary

message: For more information on why this articles should be deletd, see Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary Travelbird 14:09, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm...I don't buy that this article can only exist as a dictionary definition. It is a topic that is being researched! See for example, something like this. Albeit, we need more people to look at this article, but if it ultimately ends up as a dictionary entry, I suppose it simply means that the Wiki can't hold this information at this time. --HappyCamper 03:56, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Hmm...well, I added the  back in again. I was hoping that a bunch of Wikipedians would spontaneously jump to find all sorts of neat information for this one. It was quite fun when last time, about 5 Wikipedians did so for one of these articles. Maybe let's leave it as is, and whatever other people like to do with the article, that would be good too. I don't have the motivation right now to dig up the right sources to expand this article in a reasonable way, so for now, the Magic of the Wiki will have to wait (or fall on other Wikipedians). --HappyCamper 04:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, yes, it does seem like this could be expanded into a cool article. I was just tagging it as what I saw, I hope you don't mind. It would be nice if one or more editors jump in and add enough information so that it's not just a definition / dictionary article. If I get the time I might see what I can turn up ... but I might be being pulled into an informal mediation (on a totally different topic) that could suck up my time - I'll see. Brian 04:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

text: No, of course I didn't mind :-) On second reading, this article doesn't offer anything more than what "common sense" would be, and that isn't quite good enough. I think I might revisit this article too. --HappyCamper 04:39, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 07:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: * Talk:List of Chinese dictionaries#A red link is associated with the following....
--222.67.209.155 (talk) 02:33, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The reason for the red link in the see also section.... 

message: Vilma 146.0.17.78 (talk) 20:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vilma
Talk:List of assassinated Indian politicians

message: Shouldn't Pramod Mahajan's name appear in this list? Granted he wasn't killed for ideological or political reasons, but he was still an important political figure who was killed while he held an important office with the BJP. Thanks AreJay 14:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't Mahatma Gandhi be on the list since he was an Indian politician and he was assasinated?
Mahatma Gandhi has a title of mahatma. his name is Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. also, he is not designated as the Father of nation officially. So do not publish wrong information  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.204.172.192 (talk) 12:01, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mahatma Gandhi 

message: Today Arjun9821 (talk) 20:01, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naba Kishore Das Assassination
Talk:Rock Around the Clock

message: Please see WP:V and WP:CITE. Thanks!  Mattisse(talk) 15:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The featured article process in Wikipedia is fatally flawed and I do not support it nor do I subscribe to it. I've seen one too many articles that I've worked hard on be named to Good or Featured status only to lose that status because of the changing whims of editors. 23skidoo 19:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not suggesting trying for the featured article status. I'm just pointing out the need for real citations in any article per WP:V and WP:CITE as there are people who don't understand about citations.  Mattisse(talk) 19:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If people want to read more about the facts here, they can track down the three books listed. All the information here is in those 3 sources. That's my point. Footnotes do not work on an Internet-based forum, and fact tags basically ruin the article, too. Not every statement has to be crossreferenced if there are books and websites clearly listed that people can look for themselves. 23skidoo 15:52, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations missing 

message: This song has been covered in other languages too, e.g. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wVldb1R1QeE Kowloonese (talk) 18:44, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  foreign language covers
Talk:Sideband

message: LSB is sometimes called LSSB, and USB is sometimes called USSB.Dima373 (talk) 19:40, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a subtle difference.  LSSB refers to single sideband modulation based on the lower sideband.  LSB is just the lower sideband, either on its own or as part of a modulation scheme (like AM or FM). SpinningSpark 19:51, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  LSSB and USSB 

message: Some broadcast television systems use a vestigal sideband with a nominal width of 0.75 MHz others use 1.25 MHz.
0.75 MHZ is obviously more economic in overall bandwidth terms but what (if any) are the benefits of 1.25 MHz ? 213.40.110.233 (talk) 23:39, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ;NTSC has the carrier 1.25MHz above the bottom of the channel, and 0.75MHz lower sideband bandwidth. As the filters aren't perfect, that goves the filters some space. Note that the IF filters have to fix this up, otherwise the frequency response will be wrong. Gah4 (talk) 06:26, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  0.75 MHZ or 1.25 MHz
Talk:Christown Spectrum Mall

message: The article states "Chris-Town was the first indoor air-conditioned mall built west of the Mississippi River."  ...the first enclosed mall, period, is Southdale mall in Edina, MN.  If Southdale had air conditioning, then this fact is false since Edina is west of the mississippi (barely). (Corby 14:16, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air conditioning 

message: This needs to be fixed. Grossman actually acquired Chris-Town way back in 1965. What happened in 2001 was the name change to "Phoenix Spectrum Mall."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoenix1963 (talk • contribs) 19:54, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grossman Company Properties acquired the mall in 2001?
Talk:Move It On Over (song)

message: He's forced to sleep in the doghouse; is this where the metaphor "in the doghouse" comes from, or was Williams playing on an already established metaphor?  Minaker (talk) 01:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a double meaning. The metaphors were for the 'folks' listening to the record, but in real-time, he was talking to his dog at 3 in the morning, as he squeezed into his doghouse for a few hours sleep. But that is an excellent question we should always ask, what was the lyricists meaning in 1947? I think the metaphor "in the doghouse because the old lady is mad at me" was what Hank was thinking as he wrote this song. Just my personal opinion. Tillywilly17 (talk) 14:15, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

message: I see the genre of this song changed and reverted on a regular basis. I hate to divert my valuable time to this subject, but looks like there is no choice
In this era. the term 'Country Music' was barely known; all through the 1940s. it was 'Hillbilly' music, over time it was renamed 'Country' music; I have no objection to either
Hank's livelier tunes were called honky-tonk, even by himself
I have seen this labeled as 'rock and roll'  I will admit this song 'rocks' for 1947. but I mean that figuratively only. 
I don't usually post references for genre, it makes the page look bad with all those numbers, but will do if that is what is required. If you search with google, beware, many of the hits are 'user-sourced' from current times, therefore useless. I try to focus on 1947. Don't like when people revise history. In 1947, there were no 45s and 'Memorial albums', there were juke joints playing 10" platters until they wore out. Until 1948, most 'folk' record charts were based on jukebox popularity I believe. Don't want to look all this up unless I have too. Rather eat a plate of jambalaya.  Tillywilly17 (talk) 13:56, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally find your genre changes a bit odd and unnecessary. Also, this is a "proto-" rock and roll song. It's even mentioned on the Origins of rock and roll article
Dpm12 (talk) 00:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre Changes
Talk:The Assassin's Knot

message: I edited this content because it looks like Len hasn't taken part in that thread. I did find his announcement on Pen & Paper and kept the ref for the Dragonsfoot discussion thread for it's relation to the name to the projected module. There is a funny thread on Dragonsfoot asking for info on sheep farming for Len, so I'm guessing that's going to be a big part of the economy of the communities in L4 and L5. Now I have to change the Devilspawn-related content on the Lendore Isles article. --Smcmillan (talk) 08:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material on Devilspawn 
Talk:Axe of the Dwarvish Lords

message: I propose removing the above tags, having addressed them both. Further work needs to be done on the history section but the majority of the article is now from a non-fictional perspective, so the relevent tag should probably be deleted. Please register any valid objections to removal of these tags before 2/11/08.  Thanks. --Smcmillan (talk) 06:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Endorse. Good job. BusterD (talk) 13:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Disputed. This article is comprised of about 850 words of at least 700 are dedicated to in universe descriptions of this fictional artifact as if it was real. This article also contains weasel words and peacock terms. --Gavin Collins (talk) 09:00, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment. I addressed the peacock terms in the opening. I really have to wonder how you can say the article is written primarily in-universe. I admitted that the history section needed a tweak but your characterization prior to my editing that section is way off the mark. If you want to make valid objection please take the time to read the article and compare it to exemplary articles listed in wp:waf, and then present your case with examples. Thanks. --Smcmillan (talk) 17:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to remove in-text citation and in-universe tags 

message: I agree with Jack on this issue, although I don't want to remove the template until we've discussed it. The focus of the article is on the item and not on the module, so I think the use of the module template is inappropriate. I haven't read all of the documentation on the project page though so if I'm wrong about the project standards let me know. If anyone thinks it would be better to make the article about the module (reasons: Following the trend in the project, D&D articles, or other gaming,  articles, etc...) I'm sure we could easily rewrite it to have that focus, and still include the item info that is in the current article. Thanks. --Smcmillan (talk) 01:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That was my take on things. Now, please, no one just go an split this off to a module page without finding nice reliable sources that unambiguously establish notability for said article. I'll take another stab at removing the inappropriate template since my prior edit elicited the above unsolicited support. Any further discussion should focus on making a case for inclusion. Thanks. --Jack Merridew 11:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Module Template
Template talk:Zaporizhzhia Oblast

message: Since the template would swell in size with the listing of all cities, towns and villages, we could also go with a simpler format, following the Ukraine template. We could then list all of the cities towns and villages in another template for each raion.--tufkaa 14:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We should probably do this for all of them, and while we're at it, we can fix the endings, changing to yi from y which most of them now have.--tufkaa 15:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say, whatever it is, we should do the same for all oblast templates. But if you like a small template, then probably we should list raions and cities only. In the end, it's just a navigation template, not a description of subdivisions (which has to be done inside an article). --MapLover 00:56, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We could do that just as well, and then if we don't make a separate navigation template for towns and villages, we could place them in the oblast category: like :Category:Zaporizhia Oblast, which I am starting right now. —dima  /sb.tk/  17:26, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: All the groups are in alphabetical order, except for hromadas, which look to the casual eye to be in random order. I looked at the templates for two other oblasts – they had hromadas in alphabetical order. Are the hromadas in this template in some unobvious order or are they random? Should they be changed to alphabetical? Nurg (talk) 06:09, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be alphabetical, I will reorder them later today. Ymblanter (talk) 06:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You forgot. I've done it now. Nurg (talk) 03:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, thanks Ymblanter (talk) 01:00, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of hromadas