lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sally the Witch

message: OKAY, This is an Anime and Manga series. This was a Black & White Anime series. Then color. There are about a lot of Eps. c: --Naomitwin (talk) 13:55, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note from Naomitwin 

message: The object of preposition comes after the particle "no" so "yume no" wouldn't mean "dream of" but "of the dreams", like how "hoshi no" means of the stars. Masterball2 (talk) 05:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  actually, about that.
Talk:Mazinkaiser

message: This article ought to mention the Mazinkaiser manga and its relation (predecessor or post-decessor) to the anime. 68.33.247.196 (talk) 21:41, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Manga

message: *Otaku USA
--KrebMarkt (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s)
Talk:Mazinkaiser (robot)

message: In the article Mazinkaiser's (OVA version) height is said to be 33m.  How can that be?  At 33m he would completely dwarf Zed, Great, Aphrodite and Venus.  He's clearly taller than these four but at 33m he'd be nearly twice the size of Zed.  
Size comparisons:
http://mazinworld.com/MazingerImages/ashmaz8.JPG
http://mazinworld.com/MazingerImages/ashmaz9.JPG
Is this just a case of the official specs being bad?  Did they scale down Great from 25m but attempt to keep Mazinkaiser's official specs more impressive than Great's?  I'd love to change that 33m figure but I have nothing to change it to.  I would estimate he's maybe 25m tall, tops - but I can't just pull a figure like that out of thin air and stick it in the article, now can I?
Zaku kai 18:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mazinkaiser height: 33 meters?? 
Talk:Dino Mech Gaiking

message: I think the pseudo-sequel series should get its own page on wikipedia, so as to avoid making this article unnecessarily long. Kouban (talk) 01:06, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legend of Daiku Maryu 

message: I think it should be left till later in the article. It's not good to hit readers on the face so early in the article with legal crap. Aurora sword (talk) 09:04, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, sure.  Moved that stuff to a separate section.  -- SEWilco (talk) 01:49, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Legal Issues 

message: From here. Its set to be released in 2012. E Wing (talk) 07:23, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaiking movie? 
Talk:Asin of Baekje

message: The passage "In 403 he allied with Silla against Goguryeo." seems to be completely wrong. Samguk Sagi record says that he "sent troops to attack and invaded Silla frontiers".
Mahal Aly 16:16, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Correcting errors
Talk:Daniel Fitzhenry

message: I'd like to suggest that the sections 'Signature moves' and 'Fan support' be removed from this article on the basis that they are not appropriate for a reference article. The playing career section also needs to be re-worded and uncited references removed. Florrie 17:18, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Silence is concensus.Florrie 13:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning up

message: What is the meaning of Fitzy World Order image in the article? Best Regards. DynamoDegsy (talk) 08:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: FWO were a small bunch of fellas who cheered for Fitzhenry, and made their own posters & t-shirts up. The level of irony was unclear. I seriously doubt you'll find a ref for any of that, though.Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Fitzy World Order
Talk:Mapum of Geumgwan Gaya

message: Not sure I understand the "context" tag... the article already explains what he was king of, etc.  What sort of context would be appropriate? -- Visviva 10:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Could you put 'Korean' King which would give it more context from a modern perspective?  Or does that not make historical sense as Korea wasn't really an entity?  I don't know my Korean history so I'm not sure that makes sense.  When I read the intro I thought it was referring to some science fiction book! Maustrauser 10:56, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Liam Fulton

message: hi, i edited this page a little but am new to wikipedia. i actually knew Liam when we were at primary school. we were in the same classes from year 1 to year 6. i wanted to add some information about him. but i cant find a source. only myself
i can tell you what i remember. liam went to paramatta west primary school from years 1-6. was football captain for all years under coach Mr Roo
he also played for Merrylands rams during his time while i knew him at school, i know this because we faced off outside of school. because i played for another team in the same competition [ paramatta junior eels] 
anyways i did not know he had made the big time until today when i read this article.
anyways if you ever read this liam. this is chris c from parramatta west primary school, glad to see you finally cracked the big time in football. its all you could ever talk about at school.
110.174.71.241 (talk) 03:21, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ben Galea

message: Geez, does it seem like overkill to list every single try he's scored in super league? I can't imagine what Martin Offiah's page would look like. Doctorhawkes (talk) 08:38, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Try stats
Talk:Chris Heighington

message: Ireland wanted him to play for them at the 2008 WC, worth putting in no? 81.129.220.96 (talk) 05:58, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Neuro-linguistic programming

message: We really need to keep this template limited to NLP specific articles or articles that directly related to NLP. We cannot link things like "Education" because that article was not written with NLP in mind. It's just not directly related enough. --Woohookitty(meow) 09:15, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I thought that was sensible, but I've checked a couple of other templates I based this one on, I see you're right. I'll just tweak the formatting to keep the template a little narrower for people with 800 x 600 screens though. It could end up with 1 or 2 more articles added here over time, if any significant and specific NLP articles get added to the category. But that aside, by and large, agreed, edits make sense. FT2 (Talk) 10:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits I made 

message: There is zero evidence that Noam Chomsky has had anything to do with NLP, whether as an influence or otherwise.  That is bordering on defamation.  I removed the link to his name, per WP:BLP violations. Bearian (talk) 21:14, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Noam Chomsky]] 

message: This might be better as a side-bar-with-collapsible lists like :Template:Feminism sidebar William M. Connolley (talk) 20:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sidebar?
Talk:Nayim

message: Added category. See source http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/23159023. 130.88.193.61 (talk) 13:23, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Muslim
Talk:Jun of Gojoseon

message: *
:"An extreme manifestation of nationalism and the family cult was the revival of interest in Tangun, the mythical founder of the first Korean state... Most textbooks and professional historians, however, treat him as a myth."
*
:"Although Kija may have truly existed as a historical figure, Tangun is more problematical."
*
:"Most [Korean historians] treat the [Tangun] myth as a later creation."
*
:"The Tangun myth became more popular with groups that wanted Korea to be independent; the Kija myth was more useful to those who wanted to show that Korea had a strong affinity to China."
*
:"If a choice is to be made between them, one is faced with the fact that the Tangun, with his supernatural origin, is more clearly a mythological figure than Kija."--219.111.109.7 (talk) 16:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Disclaimer: the above message was originally posted by me here. The anom user (who uses many different IPs) has reposted my message on several talk pages, all without attribution. I have absolutely no connection with the user. -Zanhe (talk) 17:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Academic consensus
Talk:Bandai Namco Filmworks

message: Shouldn't some reference to Sunrise's work on Batman: The Animated Series be mentioned? It is known that their anime The Big O was influenced by that series.--RogueJedi86 11:30, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It probably should. Do you have a citation also? --GunnarRene 00:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Batman: The Animated Series? 

message: This is ENGLISH wikipedia, not japanese wikipedia.  Ganryuu, can you please explain to me why you choose to continuosly remove the english titles, replacing them with romaji ones and why you deleted two of the L-Gaim OVAs?  The kanji and romaji titles are already there, so it makes no sense whatsoever to make those changes. I would appreciate not getting in another back and forth with you, so please explain.  I'm putting my edits back in tomorrow if I don't get a response from you. Quiddity99 04:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is untrue, as I have added all of the entries in the list myself, citing better-known English titles wherever applicable, however it is not necessary to add to every instance of the titles, especially when there are already main articles expanding on the topic. Title conventions are not to be judged based on choice of language, but whether or not the particular title is better known or not, and anyway, discussions on these naming conventions are to be applied in the main article pages for these articles, not here, as what is linked here is merely a list. If a particular entry has already been previously mentioned, especially in a list, there is no need to link to every instance of it. Please read Wikipedia:Civility. Ganryuu  (talk) 07:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  English Titles 

message: It seems that navigating to works made by Sunrise had been tough lately for viewers. May I suggest writing the list of works in point form such as those in J.C.Staff, Madhouse and Studio Deen.--Bumblezellio (talk) 16:55, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing Article 

message: Under "non-mecha works" it has at least one listing error. Valvrave the Liberator is clearly a mecha anime. There may be more.72.194.84.61 (talk) 03:35, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix Listing of Anime 
Talk:Amos Roberts

message: needs a cleanup CorleoneSerpicoMontana 20:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ryan Cross

message: married to Danielle Dole with daughter Marley (DOB 13.12.04)
Has he worn the national jersey in both codes at the junior levels? Alexsanderson83 11:32, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Doyle (rugby league)

message: Who does Johnny Doyle play for these days, or has he gone back to mining? CorleoneSerpicoMontana 18:44, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current status
Talk:Hana no Ko Lunlun

message: Was there more than one release of Angel? I've got a two-episode tape of it, and the characters' names are different in it than those listed on the main page. Like, the cat and dog are Kathy and Wendel, the villain is Malicia and her sidekick is named Ivan. Gladrius 18:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Angel names

message: Good luck finding them, the anime is 20 years old. There is unlikely to be anything that wikipedia will consider floating around the internet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.109.202.45 (talk) 20:42, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  References/Citations
Talk:Kamen no Ninja Akakage

message: Remember that anime, manga, etc. without official translations use romaji Japanese titles instead. --SeizureDog 07:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The movie did have an official English title: Red Shadow. Doceirias 21:44, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh, but it was really Red Shadow: Akakage, so it's kinda iffy.--SeizureDog 21:08, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese titles, not English
Talk:Dragon Ball: Sleeping Princess in Devil's Castle

message: In the beginning of the article, it says "far to the west", but later it says "gone far to the east for training. Is this a typo, or did it really happen?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.142.162.252 (talk) 16:30, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction?
Talk:City of Doncaster

message: I have added Toll Bar to the list of place in the Metropolitan Borough. I was surprised it was not already there! If I have have put it in the wrong place then please remove it. I would be interested if anyone would be interested on writing a short article on Toll Bar. --Vince 11:03, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toll Bar 

message: Shouldn't that population statistics table be formatted like an actual table? I'd be bold about it, but don't have the necessary skills yet :-) DDNYG74B (talk) 16:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It already is a table. I have formatted it to look like a table. Is that what you were looking for? Keith D (talk) 17:16, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It was, thanks. The code is a little more complicated than I'd expected it to be, so thanks for the example! Oh, and for the welcome message :-) DDNYG74B (talk) 10:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pop stats table 
Talk:Dragon Ball Z: Lord Slug

message: When in DBZ Universe is this movie to have taken place?Lee1019 19:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: before they went to namek, but probably after the saiyans appeared. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.183.44.106 (talk) 04:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

text: No, it's impossible no matter which way you slice it. It couldn't before they went to Namek, because Piccolo and Shenron are in the movie, and Piccolo and Kami both were killed by the Saiyans, so that meant Shenron was dead as well. It couldn't be a little before or after the Saiyan's arrival, since Goku was still dead at the time. It couldn't be before Raditz arrived, because Gohan didn't have that hair or clothes style (not to mention Goku wasn't nearly that strong). So it couldn't have taken place at any time, just a fun movie with no consistency with the manga or anime.
Don't go mad at me when I say this, but...the Ginyu Saga. Yeah, I know, it seems impossible, because Goku, Krillin and Gohan were on Namek at the time, but just look at how strong Goku and the others were. I can't explain why Piccolo & Shenron were there, seeing as Piccolo should be dead, but Goku reached an amount of strength close to a Super Saiyan. What else? Son Gohan (talk) 16:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Setting 
Talk:MMDF

message: I remember when I did tech support for an ISP that used MMDF, it acquired the name "the Mail Munching and Deletion Facility" as it was not too hot on 8-bit encodings. Oh happy days. I'd add the nickname, but not sure how widespread the name was or if it was an internal thing MrWeeble Talk Brit tv 09:38, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ideally a source should be cited for verification, not personal memory of an editor. W Nowicki (talk) 20:45, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Anecdote
Talk:Carnegie Mellon University, Australia

message: it closed118.210.55.206 (talk) 06:28, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: It closed?

message: The University of Notre Dame in Australia is not part of any similar university from the USA. It has personal links from its creation, but is not part of any US university.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.172.36.45 (talk) 07:12, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second US university? 

message: An article in the conversation  
suggests the campus has only 34 FTE students. Newystats (talk) 02:51, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only 34 Full-time equivalent students?
Talk:Dragon Ball Z: Super Android 13!

message: Are we gonna talk about when Android 13.0 (the operating system) comes out? 174.251.171.62 (talk) 21:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The operating system 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Android 14 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Herbfur (He/Him) (talk) 02:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Android 14" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Ostwald ripening

message: This is also what happens when ice cream warms and then refreezes: the number of ice crystals decreases and their size increases. Sendhil 20:50, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ice cream 

message: I've tried to make the article more readable, and reduce copy-edit problems. I also took out the discussion of kinetics, as Ostwald ripening is a thermodynamic process, and while kinetics does play a large role in crystallization, it was getting the discussion somewhat confused. Best, --Bfigura (talk) 01:34, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit & such 

message: Regarding this quote from the article: In geology, it is the textural coarsening, aging or growth of phenocrysts and crystals in solid rock which is below the solidus temperature. It is often ascribed as a process in the formation of orthoclase megacrysts, as an alternative to the physical processes governing crystal growth from nucleation and growth rate thermochemical limitations.
What is meant by thermochemical here? Is this meant to be distinct from chemical thermodynamics? Any help would be appreciated. --Bfigura (talk) 05:13, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question for a Geologist 

message: Google Books has the Lehrbuch Der Allgemeinen Chemie at:
http://books.google.com/books?id=Gi8KAAAAIAAJ&dq=editions:0UZ4y9umq2wgk
This shows v. 2, pt. 1 published in 1893, rather than 1896. I have not changed the reference because I have not read the book, but the original author may wnat to check the citation, and could add the link if desired.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.216.138.253 (talk) 20:04, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Typogephical error in reference?

message: In Mechanism, this 
"Note that the quantity ⟨R⟩3 is different from ⟨R3⟩, and only the latter"
is what shows up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.71.118.114 (talk) 12:35, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters aren't showing up in Chrome 

message: It seems to me that there is an error in the formula for f (R, t), missing ρ2 and possibly some coefficient. 
In original paper this formula is for R3 distribution.   M-i-k-e-v (talk) 09:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  formula for f (R, t)
Talk:Shigeru Mizuki

message: Greetings,
I have been trying, and failing, to find any sources that discuss Mizuki being left-handed prior to his unfortunate injury. Virtually every source I've found seems to be derived from some version of this wikipedia page. So--does anyone have anything concrete, site-able, regarding Mizuki's handed-ness? Notice it's not mentioned at all in Dreamland Japan, which is the biggest profile on Mizuki in English to date. Seanmercy (talk) 09:26, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mizuki's handed-ness 

message: Found https://blogcritics.org/graphic-novel-review-the-trial-of-kitaro-by-shigeru-mizuki-from-drawnquarterly/ .. I wonder if more is written about this
WhisperToMe (talk) 06:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trial of Kitaro  

message: I'm new to the career of this artist, and the section on Bakeichōnosei wasn't clear. Is it a book? Or a series?  When did he create it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ferretface99 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bakeichōnosei
Talk:Grimbergen

message: Doubtful formulation. Is Brabant or Flanders one of the three regions of Belgium?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.159.64.117 (talk) 23:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regions of Belgium 
Talk:Suzu, Ishikawa

message: I assume that they all come from the official website, but I haven't gone through and checked yet.  Should this get flagged as needing citations? Whitneyzac (talk) 02:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Just changed the rating on it.  I feel like there's definitely a good chunk of information here, but there could be a lot more.  Also could use some better citations. Whitneyzac (talk) 03:19, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

text: I'm in the process of translating and bringing over some information from the Japanese page, so until I get done with that, there might not be citations for a lot of the things here. Whitneyzac (talk) 06:42, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

text: Just as a disclaimer, some of these translations are really shaky.  I'll try to fix them up when I get a chance. Whitneyzac (talk) 08:41, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

text: Just found the Suzu City Living Guide, and apparently the whole history section is lifted out of there.  I'll at least try to get it so it isn't a word-for-word copy. Whitneyzac (talk) 07:45, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: :I'm kind of worried about the citations in this article.
Talk:AIM-4 Falcon

message: Would it make sense to mention how the AIM-4 Falcon design influenced later weapons, such as the Phoenix and Maverick?  Epstein's Mother 10:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Phoenix/Maverick connection

message: This article states: "The AIM-4F/AIM-4G Super Falcon remained in USAF and ANG service, primarily with Convair F-102 Delta Dagger and F-106 Delta Dart interceptors, until the final retirement of the F-106 in 1988." The F and G were only used on the F-106. Indeed, this article is rather oddly written - the Falcon was first and foremost a bomber destroyer, yet most of the article is devoted to its failure as a weapon against maneuverable fighter targets in a dogfight situation - basically a case of the wrong tool for the job. For a really excellent history of the missile and its operational life, see:  http://www.ausairpower.net/Falcon-Evolution.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.18 (talk) 12:48, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: One Mess of an Article

message: "The Sidewinder was much more effective and continues to serve the armed forces of the United States and numerous allied nations to this day."
1. Why is that sentence there?
2. That sentence is wrong.
The AIM-9 Sidewinder had initially just as poor a record. In the 50's and 60's the AIM-9 was not better than the AIM-4B/C/G. The SARH Falcon's guidance performance depended on the aircraft it was used with. The F-4 had poor results. The F-106 had good results.
--Moritzgedig (talk) 21:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Reliable sources please. And as for , I don't recall the F-106 ever being used in combat, so how could it have good results? BilCat (talk) 21:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Against target drones in simulated combat it had good results. Are you claiming that a fighter can never be called god unless it has been used in live combat against a shooting enemy? They can test these things. The F-106 was designed from the ground up as a weapons system integrated with the AIM-4, and it had a very high ratio of kills in live fire tests from the F-106, which could use bot IR and SARH versions to complement each other as well. When fired from an F-4 as a stand-alone, the missile had trouble tracking well enough to score a direct hit because the firing solution was at the whim of the pilot. On the F-106, the pilot selected the desired target and flew an intercept course, the computer itself decided the optimal point to launch, and it made some very spectacular shots for the era,. both against high speed off-angle targets, and against simulated fighters. But bombers were always the intended target. In Vietnam they had a convergence of the wrong plane for the missile, an unexpected sort of combat, and crappy maintainance/environmental conditions for storage.
64.223.92.229 (talk) 15:24, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sidewinder