Talk:Cædwalla

message: Yorke (p. 137) and Stenton (p. 70, 3rd edn) both say Bede says Cædwalla was seriously wounded in taking the Isle of Wight.  I can't find this in the edition I have, and I wonder if this is actually a reference to the Whitby life of Wilfrid, which I don't have access to.  I'm going to include a mention in the article but source it just to Stenton; it's clear some primary source supports it so I don't think I need to keep it out of the article.  If anyone can find the reference, please leave a note here. Thanks. Mike Christie (talk) 17:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it; it's in IV 16.  It's cited now. Mike Christie (talk) 21:55, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wounded? 

message: I abbreviated this: "His name is an anglicized derivation from the British Cadwallon, itself derived from Catuvellauni the pre-Roman tribal name, meaning "Battle-expert.""; the latter clause is unsourced and though it's plausible I can't find support for it.  I'm putting it here so it can be re-added if someone has a source. Mike Christie (talk) 03:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This would be great to add to the article.  Is there a reference work that can be cited for the information above?  Ideally the citation should specifically refer to Cadwallon and Catuvellaunus, otherwise it might be regarded as original research.   I don't think the information about the underlying soundshifts has to be mentioned in the article (though it could be), but to talk about the meaning of the elements of "Catuvellanus" I think we should try to find some source that asserts Cadwallon's name is related to it. Mike Christie (talk) 14:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Patrick Wormald, in "The Anglo-Saxons" (ed. Campbell) says that there is evidence Cædwalla was regarded as a bretwalda by some, but not by all.  He says in the notes that his overall discussion of the bretwaldas will be defended in a "forthcoming publication".  I think his comment needs a source that gives the argument, so I'm omitting it for now.  If someone has a better source for this, please add it. Mike Christie (talk) 10:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bretwalda 

message: Caedwalla may have been following the precident of Contantine the Great in reserving baptism for his deathbed.  A man on his deathbed can commit no further sin.
With reference to supporting Caedwalla's Christianity previous to his abdication, and to make a point that bloodthirstiness in pursuit of political advantage and Christian attitudes can coexist, the episode in Bede (Chapter XVI) concerning Caedwalla's agreement that the two young brothers of the last king of Wight be converted and baptised before they were executed could be usefully introduced.  Caedwalla was obviously bent on exterminating the royal family of Wight, an effective way of crushing dissent, if harsh.
Urselius 20:21, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea -- I added a note to that effect. Mike Christie (talk) 21:41, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caedwalla's Christianity (and ruthlessness) 

message: I think the point needs to be made that the so called charter of his founding a monastery at Hoo in Kent is suspect because only the Peterborough version of the ASC refers to it and they claimed it was a property of theirs in the late tenth century when the Anglo Saxon kingdoms were united. As Caedwalla had no relation with East Anglian foundations and had no effective control over Kent after the anti-Mul revolt, the whole matter is dubious. Tony S 89.168.46.111 (talk) 06:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is the relevant charter, according to Kirby (the source used in the article); it is regarded as at least partly forged.  Kirby doesn't mention the Chronicle as a source for this.  Do you have a source for this argument?  The points you make are reasonable but we need to find a secondary source that makes them if we want to include them. Mike Christie (talk) 12:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monastary at Hoo 

message: I am having trouble making sense of the first paragraph:
He was exiled as a youth, and during this time attacked the South Saxons and killed their king, Æthelwealh, in what is now Sussex. Cædwalla was unable to hold the territory ...
Exiled from where?
"During this time" –- what time?
Was it their own king that the South Saxons killed?
"what is now Sussex" –- Sussex is now a county rather than a kingdom, but I think the borders are little changed.
What territory was Cædwalla unable to hold, and how had he got hold of it?  Was he still in exile at the time?
Maproom (talk) 13:33, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Suggest:  He was exiled from Wessex as a youth and during his exile gathered forces and attacked the South Saxons, killing their king, Æthelwealh, in what is now Sussex. Cædwalla was unable to hold the South Saxon territory ...   --71.163.153.146 (talk) 19:37, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:   --71.163.153.146 (talk) 22:09, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. It seems much more readable now. Maproom (talk) 22:46, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem, Maproom—you asked all the right questions.  --71.163.153.146 (talk) 00:52, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first paragraph 

message: , you haven't edited the article since just before this edit, on a matter you took issue with earlier. What do you think? Drmies (talk) 16:44, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't see everything that's cited on Google Books, but I can see enough to be sure that there really is a discussion of Caedwalla's actions as genocide.  It would be best if there were other sources making similar comments, since that's strong language, but I don't think there's a reason to remove it. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 17:26, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

text: *Thanks Mike. Drmies (talk) 23:46, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genocide? 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cerdic of Wessex which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 05:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress