lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kamen Rider 2

message: Well, I just made something like a structure for the article. I used a sandbox on my user page.
I'd actualy love to do this entire article, but the problem is I don't know jack squat and I don't know where to watch the episodes. I've been useing Youtube for all the 3rd Gen Riders and so far there have been no regular Kamen Rider series. I guess I could look it up on a website with a timeline. Well, I'd like to know what the rest of you think of it White Coyote 01:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backbone 
Talk:Courts of Scotland

message: I would like to question whether or not a sheriff can hear a trial in solemn cases without a jury.--86.150.25.2 21:47, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A sheriff cannot as a solemn trial is by definition with a jury. The Lockerbie trial (conducted by the high Court) may have technically been a solemn trial but that was highly exceptional and special ad hoc legilsation was required.--Lucifer 12:58, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sheriff's Role
Talk:North Franklin Mountain

message: I have seen several names for this mountain:  North Franklin Mountain, North Franklin Peak, North Mount Franklin, etc.  I went with "North Franklin Mountain" for two reasons:
1.  The  USGS seems to prefer "North Franklin Mountain," since it's the name that appears on Topo maps.
2.  Because the mountain is in the central part of the Franklins, the name "North Franklin" only makes sense if used in relation to South Franklin Mountain (i.e., the two prominent peaks at the center).  So, logically, the two mountains should have the same name other than the "north" and "south".  As I have yet to see South Franklin referred to as anything other than "South Franklin Mountain," I went with "mountain" for both of them.  
Bms4880 21:53, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The mountain's name 

message: The main article for Rocky Mountains in Wikipedia claim there are no Rocky Mountains in Texas, and that the Rocky Mountains' most southern tip is in New Mexico.  All other sources I've checked, say there are no Rocky Mountains in Texas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 15.211.201.90 (talk) 16:55, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not part of Rocky Mountains
Talk:Principality of Reuss-Gera

message: How did this one become 4? Did they reset? Nil Einne (talk) 17:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, in 1900. He was born in 1919, became prince of Reuss-Köstritz in 1946 after the death of his father Heinrich XXXIX. Heinrich IV could only become head of the family after its former head, Heinrich XLV was officially declared dead. I don't know if there are any newborn boys inthe Reuss-Köstritz family after 2000, Guss2 (talk) 12:44, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Heinrich IV 1962-present?

message: My vague understanding is that three branches - Reuss-Schleiz, Reuss-Lobenstein, and Reuss-Ebersdorf - initally had joint sovereignty over this principality, but that the latter two died out some time before 1866, leaving only Reuss-Schleiz.  Should we list the other two branches?  Can anyone give any more details on this? john k (talk) 17:01, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Three branches? 

message: At least after 1848 (I think earlier), there were two branches of the house of Reuss, designated in German as "ältere" and "jüngere". These could be translated as "older" and "younger", or as "senior" and "junior".  But Wikipedia has "older" and "junior", which is inconsistent. I propose using the latter, and moving this article to "Reuss younger line", unless I am persuaded otherwise. Maproom (talk) 21:06, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "junior", or "younger" 

message: Who are all those 15 living dynasts in the Stonsdorf branch? Are morganatic descendants in line for the Reuss throne? I found 15 names and listed some of them (because the previous editor stated there are 15). However, some are clearly morganatic. So maybe I found the wrong ones and did not find the younder generation? Or there are really less than 15 (maybe because some of the old ones died recently)? However, the mother of the Hereditary Prince of Reuss is just a baroness herself, so maybe morganatics are OK for the throne.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.249.44.172 (talk) 11:22, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stonsdorf branch
Talk:Villa Medici at Careggi

message: Marsilio Ficino died in 1499 - not 1494. Kalopharis 21:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hell week

message: This is a disambiguation page, for directing readers quickly to intended articles. For details, see the disambiguation page style guideline.
Some noteworthy differences from articles:
    * Generally only one navigable link (blue link) belongs in each bulleted entry.
    * The full article name should be visible; do not pipe entry names.
    * Entries are sentence fragments; do not end them with periods or other punctuation.
Heroeswithmetaphors (talk) 09:46, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Tropical Storm Jerry (2001)

message: This is one of my better efforts. I've been working on this article for months. Can anyone work with me and add more information for the preparations and impacts sections and improve the article for GA nomination? Thanks! CapeVerdeWave (talk) 18:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would appreciate help. I've searched through articles but I couldn't find considerable information on preparations and impact. I want to find more information and improve the writing prose and style and bring this article to GA status. Can you offer help? Thanks! In addition, I'm testing merging preparations and impact in my sandbox. Is the appearance and prose improved when the preparations and impact sections are merged? Thanks for input! CapeVerdeWave (talk) 16:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll be able to help in the future, but not right now. My biggest question is whether there is any more impact. If there is, then the preps and impact should remain separate. If not (which I consider unlikely but possible), then merging would be alright. Hurricanehink (talk) 20:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Overall performance
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Angry Nintendo Nerd

message: This guy just made it to the radio, still not enough?
I say keep. Who cares if you haven't heard of him. It's not like the dudes name is George Washington, it's the Angry Video Game Nerd. No one is going to confuse him with anyone with any historical value. If you're going to use the "Ive never head of him" arguement then what about Maki Goto? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maki_Goto I've never heard of her, but alot of other people have. Do I think that she should be deleted? Hell no, why should she be deleted because I've never heard of her? Besides, it's not like Wiki would lose money if they let this pop culture Icon of the 21st century have a page. Seriously, what's the worst thing that would happen? 
PeteBoz 22:04, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This particular debate is closed.  Consider deletion review instead.  If you can find reliable sources on the matter, you can also consider starting a proper article.  i kan reed 02:50, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: why not make this page a redirect to the Wikipedia ScrewAttack page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.35.55 (talk) 05:47, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Dan Bankhead

message: Although Bankhead served in the United States Marine Corps during World War II, no reliable sources found as of yet state that he served overseas in a war zone during the war. More specifically, the sources do not establish defining role in World War II. Accordingly, :Category:American military personnel of World War II was removed from the article. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 16:38, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II service
Talk:Coalway

message: the reason i've contested the speedy deletion for this article is because it shouldn't be in the A7 list, it's not about a person or group or band, it's about a village. and if you check this map, you'll notice coalway is indeed a village near coleford. this isn't advertising and nor is it nonsense, it just needs a few more sentences. i'm none the wiser as to what categories it should be in but A7? surely not. Z.S.K. 22:16, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dome of Discovery

message: Does anyone have an image of the Dome of Discovery and/or the adjacent Skylon that they are willing to upload? As long as its under a Wikipedia-compatible licence, I think an image would make a useful addition to this article. Andrew (My talk) 22:21, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Defensio pro Populo Anglicano

message: I have now updated this article and removed the "unreferenced" tag because now the references have been made explicit. I hope this answers the problems that Anthony cfc apparently saw with this article when it was tagged on 27 December 2006. Since I had originally written the article, I felt it was my responsibility to add what was felt to be lacking. 
I was constrained to delete one sentence added by someone else, this one:
:"In fact, in modelling his pamphlet on the Philippic form, Milton finds a classical antecedent for his method in Cicero's personal attacks on Mark Antony."
It may be right (and it sounds convincing to me), or it may not be, but I am not aware of what source the statement is based upon. Perhaps Wikeawade, who added this in the revision of 10:34 on 18 April 2006, or someone else can source it and re-add it to the article.--MollyTheCat 22:27, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed "unsourced" tags
Talk:Gamay Beaujolais

message: Current photo is of zinfandel - could someone find a picture of Gamay Beaujolais?
FlagSteward 22:28, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Haircut One Hundred

message: The link at the bottom doesn't work. Also there should be something about Evil Smokestacking baby — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.85.83 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 1 April 2007‎
Official website link defunct now in 2017  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2E44:9A10:2946:6EA6:3843:8FA7 (talk) 06:24, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Were this group ever said to belong to the genre called New Romantic? If so, they should be categorised as such. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:52, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Were they a new romantic group?

message: I've seen it only as "Haircut 100" before.  But either way, it seems an unusual name for a band.  Does anybody have any idea how they came up with the name?  It would be nice to cover it - at the moment the article just doesn't comment on the band's name at all. — Smjg (talk) 11:14, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did they get that name from?
Talk:Sherbrooke Forest

message: I have just been working on the Dandynong National Park article which contains the Sherbrooke Forest and it strikes me that this stub could be moved to be a paragraph within the Dandynong Nat Park article. Any opinions or objections? Titus Vespasian (talk) 07:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Karl - no objections to your suggestion; it is a good idea as long as the different parts of DRNP are distinguished in the article, as they have separate histories - e.g. Sherbrooke's place in early lyrebird research.  Go for the merge - though you should probably go through the usual process (see: WP:Merge) and add merge tags first to alert any others interested.Maias (talk) 11:12, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it is easier to find if it remains a separate article. I went looking for Sherbrooke forest and found it easily. So if you merge it, you will need to leave some means of finding it - I don't know how that works. Why bother with the move anyway? The Dandenong article points to here very adequately. Patche99z (talk) 11:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Park article 

message: what's the climate there, please? temperature-ranges (seasonal, daily), rain, air humidity, sun-shine-times? may be a section about that in the article?
(and by the way I'd like to know the same for higher eucalyptus-regnans-woods?)
thanks! HilmarHansWerner (talk) 04:54, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  clitmate?
Talk:Chamberlain (office)

message: I have divided this article from the previous disambiguation page, and will now check the links to make sure they are all relevant. Sam Blacketer 22:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that "Chamberlain" should be the disambiguation page, and this content at "Chamberlain (post)" or some such. Andy Mabbett 00:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Possibly, but that would require changing a lot of links. Most of the links to Chamberlain refer to the occupation. Sam Blacketer 08:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Now divided
Talk:Love Potion No. 9 (song)

message: When I look up the lyrics of "Love Potion Number Nine", It says:
"I took my troubles down to Madame Ruth, you know the gypsy with a gold-capped tooth."
That's surprising, because it always sounded to me like:
"I took my troubles down to Madame Rue, you know the gypsy with a gold tattoo."
For one thing, the "th" sounds, in the Internet lyrics, would be awkward in a song, as would the phrase "gold-capped", with its consonant-combinations. "Gold-capped tooth" would take longer to say.
How sure are you that it's "Ruth"? Where did that interpretation come from?
Sure, there's probably no such thing as a gold tattoo, but it never seemed problematic for a magical gypsy to have something impossible.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.169.246.137 (talk) 15:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: So what's the problem, exactly? All the article tells us is that a Gypsy was consulted. Are you just saying that the External link to the The Searchers' lyrics is wrong? It shouldn't be too difficult to find some original sheet music with lyrics? Martinevans123 (talk) 12:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madame Ruth?  ...or Madam Rue, the gypsy with a gold tattoo?
Talk:List of mass car bombings

message: I created this page since it would be best to separate the list from the actual car bomb article. I have deleted a few things from the previous list in order to condense this somewhat; if there are any problems with these deletions than feel free to change them and/or voice your opinions on the subject. PBP 22:56, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: It's a content fork from list of terrorist incidents with completely arbitrary inclusion and a title that makes no sense. This should be merged back to the year sub-articles for terrorist incidents, with a column added for the type of incident to allow easy searching. 2 lines of K303 13:16, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why does this article exist?

message: Jakarta car bomb 'parallels Bali attack' ABC
Posted Thu Aug 7, 2003 12:08am AEST 
Updated Thu Aug 7, 2003 6:03am AEST 
"Indonesian police say a car bomb which ripped through a Jakarta hotel contained the same cocktail of explosives as the Bali bombs and was detonated by mobile phone - like at least one of the Bali blasts. "
para 8 "The blast at the (Phillipine ?) ambassador's residence in Jakarta in August 2000, which is also blamed on JI, killed two people and injured 21."
Mentioned briefly in Dulmatin article.
:"He participated in the car bomb attack on the Phillipine ambassador in Jakarta on 1 August 2000"
NO other mention on Wikipedia AFAIK. 
--220.101.28.25 (talk) 18:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Rectified, see here - 2000 Philippine consulate bombing --Rowboatcop (talk) 15:10, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing attack? 

message: Why is this subsection on this page? The bulk of these assassinations have a single death attributed, which is contrary to the title of the page, which stipulates Mass bombings. Unless there are objections, I will move this subsection elsewhere. Kilbosh talk 14:46, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Assassination]]s by car bombings
Talk:Quebec, County Durham

message: There was no entity called the "province of Quebec" in 1759. The area had been called "Canada" or "New France", and was not called "Quebec" until 1774 with the Quebec Act. The town must have been named for the city Quebec, not the province. Joeldl 23:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mary Ann Craig

message: This page hasn't been updated for some time and Mary-Ann's media profile has continued to grow:
1. Her second book, 'A Spotter's Guide to the British Landscape' will be out in 2016. Announced here:
http://www.maryannochota.com/about.htm
2. Should her social media links be added? (Is that a thing on Wikipedia?)
https://twitter.com/MaryAnnOchota
https://www.facebook.com/mary.ann.ochota
3. As a journalist, she has contributed a number of articles to the Daily Telegraph's series "Adventures on your Doorstep" here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/europe/uk/adventures-on-your-doorstep/
4. She has completed a number of interviews:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3n7ZtATu0cU (BBC Breakfast interview on feral children)
http://www.campinginsider.co.uk/expert-interviews/mary-ann-ochota (Expert interview and COI for me as this is one of my company's websites.)
Outdoorsy (talk) 09:47, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We do not include future works; that information can be added when the book is published. Social media links can be added in a "External links" section. That she has written more articles and completed interviews do not enhance notability, and those sources are not ones that can be used to reference an article. LaMona (talk) 18:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: A mention of Mary-Ann's second book, plus additional links and resources

message: She's now left Time Team.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/9070961/Time-Team-Mary-Ann-Ochota-quits-Channel-4-archaeological-show.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.44.21.30 (talk) 09:23, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  In that case should it read Mary instead of Marry? should the article be moved or is the BBC article a misprint and her name is really Marry?--Greatestrowerever 15:00, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My professional name is Mary-Ann Ochota.  I am married, and use Mary-Ann Craig as a personal surname, but as a professional biography I consider that I should be 'Ochota'  - this is the name on my Press Card, my Royal Geographical Society Fellowship and all my professional television and writing credits
176.254.57.208 (talk) 10:08, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: by Anthony Appleyard. Altamel (talk) 22:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit requested on January 7
Talk:Hugh Greene

message: Personal life? Cause of death? Nietzsche 2 (talk) 03:32, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "as Greene was regarded, by the conservative minded" This shouild be replaced as it's biased. It wasn't just the conservative minded but anyone not a 'liberal' left extremist who - if they were interested at all - thought Greene did what the article says. 212.219.249.5 (talk) 18:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. Only the conservative minded even recognise that the phrase "low moral fibre" has any useful meaning. --El Ingles (talk) 19:48, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Re Director General section

message: I have removed a lot of it from the article, but will return with properly cited material shortly. Tim riley talk 18:27, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited material 

message: Dear all, 
Under the heading 'BBC director-general' on Hugh Greene's wikipedia page, there is the following quotation from him: 
"We are going to use this organisation to change the way the rest of the country thinks. We want them to see stuff they don’t like. We don’t really care if they complain."
Insofar as I can see, this quotation does not have a source.  I have looked around the internet to try & find a source, but, have been unable to locate one.  Can anyone help? 
Thanks,  Democrat208 (talk) 06:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Source for the Interesting Quotation from Hugh Greene
Talk:Cognizant Classic

message: Merge: no references, but claim of notability appears to be this (THC) topic. Has previously failed AfD Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mirasol. (separately, I created a DAB for all the suggestions of different topics now at Mirasol due to lack of primary topic) Widefox (talk) 11:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. In WP:GOLF we keep Tournament pages separate from Course pages. Nigej (talk) 10:45, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Demotape (EP)

message: I created the article so the information and image located here could be removed from the Los Abandoned. However, I barely know the band and as you might notice the article lacks such basic information such as what label it was released through and the credits. If someone knows more information on the album feel free to add it.--Leon Sword 23:08, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: This album appears non-notable, and besides that, WP:NALBUM recommends merging to the artist's page when the article is unlikely to grow beyond a stub. I'm doing that now. Skeletor3000 (talk) 17:57, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Volkssturmgewehr

message: this weapon is almost hydentical to the Italian beretta m38  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.220.193.144 (talk) 16:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I suspect that the operating principal of this rifle is not delayed blowback, but more like gas-assisted recoil.
In a delayed blowback design, the movement of the bolt and cartridge case is impeded until the chamber pressure drops enough that the bolt will not accelerate beyond the capacity of a reasonable recoil mechanism. Given the far forward location of the gas ports and the volume of the gas chamber in the Volkssturmgewehr, the gas mechanism will have little to no effect on the acceleration of the bolt until later in the cycle. This means that the bolt and cartridge case accelerate unimpeded under maximum chamber pressure and this is fundamentally different from operation of a delayed blowback mechanism. As pressure in the barrel and in gas chamber begin to equalize, the bolt will begin to decelerate due to the larger piston area of the gas chamber, hence gas-assisted recoil.
Rather ingenious in it's simplicity and to my knowledge, unique.
Mynode (talk) 14:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gas assisted recoil, not delayed blowback 

message: It's just a gun standing near a lake. You can bearly make out the GUN! 17:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The challenge is to find a better picture that is also free to use on wikipedia.--Sus scrofa (talk) 00:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better pic, please 

message: There were Volksgewehren from 1 to 5. So VG 1-5. But no single gun had this name.
Also, all 5 rifles were bolt action rifles.
The one now known as VG 1-5 is actually the Gustloff Volkssturmgewehr. This was not a bolt action but a semi-auto.
I think I have already reworked this wiki page with this information but for some reason the old version is still there. Maybe someone undid my edit? I hope next time it will stick...
Kris Hendrix aka Civettone  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.190.253.150 (talk) 02:16, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  no such thing as a VG 1-5 

message: Mind there is a difference between accurate and precise. From the info it seems that the weapon was accurate, but not very precise. --105.0.1.101 (talk) 11:27, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trueness 