lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bad Axe, Michigan

message: A lot of Bad Axe Mother Fletchers!
72.82.208.26 02:12, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: You know who lives in Bad Axe?
Talk:Rise time

message: Page says:
Consider a system composed by n cascaded non interacting blocks, each having a rise time t_{r_i} and no overshoot, whose input signal has a rise time t_{r_S}: then its output signal has a rise time equal to
    t_{r_O}=\sqrt{t_{r_S}^2+t_{r_1}^2+\dots+t_{r_n}^2}
This result is a consequence of the central limit theorem, according to Valley & Wallman 1948, pp. 77-78.
Can anyone explain why?--Light current 00:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Central limit theorem 

message: I was told that rise time depends on the L/R ratio, but that is not explained in this article. Where can I find info on this? -- 99.233.186.4 (talk) 21:06, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: L/R ratio

message: The article lede incorrectly states that "In ... digital electronics, these percentages are commonly the 10% and 90% (or equivalently 0.1 and 0.9) of the output step height". In fact, in digital electronics, the rise time is commonly specified as the time taken to transition from VL to VH (the low and high logic level threshold voltages, respectively) — which have nothing to do with the output step height. Lambtron (talk) 15:45, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The Book "High Speed Digital Design: A Handbook of Black Magic"  (Johnson and Graham) uses 10% - 90% to describe the characteristics of a digital signal as early as page 2.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.131.146.228 (talk) 03:11, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: From Designing With Logic by Texas Instruments: "... [I]t is better to define rise and fall times over the range between VIL(max) and VIH(min), which must be adhered to in order to ensure correct functioning of the device." TI bases all subsequent discussion -- and logic device specifications -- on this commonly-used definition. Lambtron (talk) 13:27, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  In digital electronics
Talk:Borkum

message: --I moved the defendant list here.  It seems excessive and untidy for the main article.</br>
"A number of former German soldiers of the 216th Marine-Flak-Abeitlung (Naval Flak Battalion) were tried for war crimes, as part of the US Military Tribunals at Dachau, from February 6 to March 21, 1946 (US v Kurt Goebell et al). They were charged with the unlawful execution of seven United States Army Air Force personnel who had survived the crash of their damaged B-17 on the island on April 8, 1944. Defendants included</br>
Akkermann Jan J., Albrecht Guenther, Geyer Karl, Goebell Kurt, Heinemann Heinrich, Krolikov.ki Walter, Mammenga Gustav, Meyer-Gerhards Klaus, Pointner Johann, Rommel Heinrich, Schmitz Johann Josef (sentenced to death, executed but exonerated of the crime in 1964), Seiler Jakob, Weber Karl, Wenzel Erich (sentenced to death), Witzke Heinz" --—Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.220.107.38 (talk • contribs) 00:08, 2 November 2005
:Makes sense; they are entirely non-notable, save for the war-crime. But it's reasonable not to forget what happened. Xyl 54 (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: First comment

message: The article states that On 19 and 20 December 1934, Wernher von Braun launched "Max" and "Moritz", the two prototypes of the A2-rocket.  According to , though, Max and Moritz were A-2 rockets (the only A-2 rockets launched), and were prototypes leading to the V-2. DRE 22:11, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rocket Prototype

message: Borkum has been very antisemitic according to Dutch and Hebrew articles. 94.212.216.150 (talk) 16:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antisemitic 

message: Ich war im Kinder Erholungskurs als Kleinkind zwischen den Jahren 1950 und 1954. Ich erinnere mich während eines ausflugs zum Nordsee-Strand wäre bald ertrunken bei einer schwimm lexion. Die Erziehungs person war sehr verärgert mit mir. Ich weiss ich war ungefähr zwischen 4 oder 5 Jahre alt, ich war geboren in 1946. 2604:CA00:10C:201B:0:0:860:BB5 (talk) 18:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Klima wechsel Kinder-Erholungsheim 1950 bis 1954
Talk:MSN Explorer

message: I believe that this article needs to be cleaned up, as it seems to me to be quite one-sided, almost like a free advert for MSN Explorer through Wikipedia, due to POV problems. I agree that its features need to be explained, but to say its "still a very good browser" even if you're not a beginner seems to go against the grain of Wikipedia's NPOV policies. Should the cleanup tag be added? Andrew 00:08, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: From the article...
:"However, some people may consider MSN Explorer to work faster than Internet Explorer."
"Work faster" how? By having the user more efficiently navigate through the UI and get to the sites he/she wants to? Or because the renderer works faster? The latter should be out of the question anyway, because this uses the Internet Explorer engine. I'm not sure what that sentence meant, really. -- — Northgrove 12:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My MSN browser actually does load pages faster than my Internet Explorer browser.--71.107.146.164 05:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faster how? 

message: Apparently if you try to sign in to MSN and have the current version of WLM, MSN says it's damaged and asks to repair, in which it fails, and prevents the user from using it. "Dakota" (talk) 03:40, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Version 7 incompatable with WLM 8.5

message: I remember an early version of MSN Explorer had its own e-mail software, as opposed to the Hotmail format it has now. If anyone has information about this please put it forth. - Dudesleeper /  Talk 21:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: E-mail
Talk:Multi-track diplomacy

message: Hello-
I was the person who entered the article on Institute for Multi-track Diplomacy. I am one of the program officers, and our organization IMTD, holds the copyright for the website (www.imtd.org). You can email us at imtd@imtd.org for further confirmation or my email .
Best,
Kalsoom Lakhani —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.163.73.52 (talk • contribs) 15:47, September 30, 2005
:That is nice to know. Did you intend to relase this contnet under the GFDL? Note that such a release would mean that anyone could edit the content at any time, and that anyone could reuse it for any purpose, including for commercial purposes. If you did, please say so clearly. You might want to confirm this by an email sent to permissions at wikimedia dot org. DES (talk) 20:26, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote the above email address and did not receive a reply in 7 days, page deleted as a result.  If I receive a release I will undelete the page. --best, kevin  ···Kzollman | Talk··· 03:55, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Reply received today, fowarded to permissions. --best, kevin  ···Kzollman | Talk··· 00:10, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Acknowledgement of permission to use received, OTRS ticket 2005110310000115. Kelly Martin (talk) 15:19, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

message: I think the job is done here.H.al-shawaf (talk) 21:19, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps there is some need for NPOV.H.al-shawaf (talk) 21:21, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikify
Talk:Free Boolean algebra

message: It can easily be shown that the free Boolean generated by S, (π, B) pi; is injective. The universal proerty is then clearly the unique extension property.--CSTAR 04:24, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: So what I'm concerned about is that there's no Schroeder-Berstein theorem for BAs--you can have injective homomorphisms both directions, but no isomorphism. In particular, we want every permutation of the generators (of the free BA) to extend uniquely to an automorphism, but how do we know it's not just an injective auto-homomorphism? --Trovatore 04:27, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

text: This should follow by applying the universal property. More generally, the universal property implies that the induced mappings are functorial.--CSTAR 04:30, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Converse follows 

message: Wow, this is a little late, but I finally noticed that someone had edited the lead paragraph back in 2007 to generalize to an arbitrary presentation of the notion of Boolean algebra, by adding a set of "operations" and calling it F.
I do not believe this is helpful.  Boolean algebras have a standard set of operations, namely ∧, ∨, ¬.  Yes, you can express them using different sets of operations, but there is no real gain in generality. --Trovatore (talk) 19:35, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph
Talk:Absaroka–Beartooth Wilderness

message: — Assignment last updated by Quyen Le B (talk) 01:33, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Information Studies
Talk:Pyotr Nesterov

message: does this need to be an article?--Herzog 00:20, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This appears to have taken place during the Battle of Galicia.  The city of Zhovkva is in the western part of Ukraine.  At the time of Nesterov's death, wouldn't Zhovkva been part of the Austria-Hungarian state of Galicia and not part of the Lvov Oblast?  Shouldn't the place of death be shown as it was at the time of Nesterov's death?  Jtyroler (talk) 04:51, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 
Talk:Brome—Missisquoi (federal electoral district)

message: Is this meant to be hyphenated (-) rather than seperated with a long dash (—)?  — Swpb talk contribs 21:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Gatineau (federal electoral district)

message: I propose to merge Gatineau--La Lievre into this article (Gatineau (electoral district)) because they are too similar to have different articles and neither is long enough to justify a split. --Username6892 21:48, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Honoré-Mercier (electoral district)

message: The recent article merger is being discussed here. Ground Zero | t 04:41, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article merger
Talk:Bagel Bites

message: When someone has time to handle cites, sources for bagel bites origins, success and controversies:
*Search pointers to "Food Processing" magazine
*opposition to advertising
*a horrible newspaper article from baton rouge that will probably source anything positive
*location of production and quality of sanitization process and improvements in the field of food preparation
*innovation in the marketing business
*previous phenomenal growth
*location of all manufacturing, sales figures
I'll get to it at some point, but figured I'd jot these down while I had them. --Busbeytheelder 04:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: (Untitled)

message: This was added to the end of the article. Since every oven is different, this type of information is not appropriate. 24.148.136.181 13:47, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cooking time info -- verifiable?

message: Bagel Bites taste good, man. Great munchies. In fact, I have some in the microwave this very moment. We need more information about this snack. Perhaps... health facts?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.231.65.233 (talk) 22:59, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The perfect quick stoner food 

message: They use to sprinkle oregano on top back in the 90s but for some reason changed it. You can see it in the commercials. I'm not sure if anyone has ever complained about the taste but, for me, it sure made a difference.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8080:7202:A595:7DEA:166C:1E76:A01D (talk) 10:21, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oregano
Talk:Life and Death of an American Fourtracker

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 23:05, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Template talk:Subpages

message: Perhaps we could change the code to use the code that my subpages personal template uses, since mine, even though mine isnt that complex, has more options, while still making all of them optional. If we did use my code for this, it will need some edits to make sure that the pages this template is already used on will still work the same. LikeLakers2 (talk) 12:54, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 8, 2006

message: This is the anniversary of the first flight of the Convair B-36, so I think that today is a good day to feature the B-36 on the main page.  Ingoolemo talk 00:58, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Raul, should you decide to feature Convair B-36, instead of Libya, on this day, the 60th anniversary of its maiden flight, please replace it on Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/August 8 with one of the hidden backup items there. Thanks. --PFHLai 05:15, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Suggest image is changed to :Image:Libya sat.jpg. Carcharoth 13:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think the national flag is better (consistent with other national entries), even though it may confuse some readers. Aquarius • talk 15:36, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest image change
Talk:Laurier—Sainte-Marie

message: This article needs new numbers up to date with the 2008 federal elections.Ithaka84 (talk) 04:10, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Numbers

message: I just undo a change, perhaps well meaning (unless it is machiavellian?), made by an anonymous user. He has created a box results for the 2015 elections in which the NDP Party is ranked first in the top of the list, followed by the Bloc Québécois and the Liberal Party, etc. This classification, conducted three months BEFORE the October 2015 elections, violates the principle of Neutral Point of View.
 Indeed, this preference in listing could subconsciously influence the electorate in suggesting that future results will be achieved in that order.
Optimally, this box should be created AFTER the elections and should classify Parties according to their respective performances. Or possibly, if we want to create it BEFORE the elections, Parties should be listed in alphabetical order.
--Mario300 (talk) 05:04, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. In preparation for the next election, we've been adding the candidates ahead of time to save work. It is the policy to rank the candidates based on the order of finish in the last election. Please take a look at how things are done on similar pages before making huge changes to a particular article. Thanks! -- Earl Andrew - talk 14:27, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violation of the principle of neutrality 

message: Well this policy is unacceptable, contrary to the principle of neutrality and should be abandoned.
PS I am a member of the French Wikipedia since 2012 but had not participated in the English Wikipedia until now.
--Mario300 (talk) 15:15, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Answer 
Talk:Outremont (electoral district)

message: Why does the percentage change in 2008 reflect the 2006 general election and not the 2007 by-election?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.108.184 (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So there's no section for the 2011 results, but the 2015 results have the total turnout and details like that from 2011. Looking at the edit page it looks like some sort of template, but I don't know how to fix it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.4.27 (talk) 19:16, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2015 Election results and 2011 election results
Talk:Terrebonne—Blainville

message: After looking at the boundaries, I'm not sure why we are treating Terrebonne-Blainville and Terrebonne as the same district. The parliamentary site says that "Terrebonne" changed names in 1997, alluding to the fact that it changed names to "Terrebone-Blainville", but not actually specifying this. I believe this to be in error, as the riding did not include Blainville at the time. Blainville was added in the 1996 redistribution (used in the 1997 election, after the supposed name change). The 2013 redistribution saw Blainville removed, and in fact the new Terrebonne riding only shares about 50% of the territory with the old riding of Terrebonne-Blainville. So, I would propose that this page only cover Terrebonne-Blainville from 1997 to 2011 and Terrebonne (electoral district) (or if you insist "Terrebonne (federal electoral district)) cover the district from 1867 to 1997 and from 2015 onwards. -- Earl Andrew - talk 12:19, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As a general rule, you're right: a significant change in the electoral district's boundary should normally always result in a new article, rather than a move of an existing article about a related but not identical former electoral district. The only time a name change should ever result in a move rather than a new article is if the name change was not accompanied by a boundary change (e.g. "Broadview—Greenwood" → Toronto—Danforth), or if the boundary adjustments were extremely minor (e.g. the shifting of a couple of city blocks) and thus the old and new names still substantively refer to more or less the same thing. In this case, moving this article is not what's called for — a 50% territory change is far too much to consider "Terrebonne—Blainville" and "Terrebonne" to be the same district. Bearcat (talk) 21:58, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you in principle that a new article might be the better option for a riding that differs that much. Saint John Harbour in 1995 is another obvious example of needing a new page. If the riding is only losing/gaining one block, no need for a new page. But how many shifting neighbourhoods and communities is enough to warrant a new page? I haven't really seen much consistency across the ridings' pages. FUNgus guy (talk) 04:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  I disagree with that example, since the riding has the same name. The shifting neighbourhoods policy is for ridings with new names. I personally keep riding articles together if they are at least 90% the same. -- Earl Andrew - talk 12:02, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternate proposal
Talk:Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot

message: I really don't belive we need separate articles for each Canadian political by-election. I think the riding article can house whatever needs to be written. --Cloveious 03:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We've recently decided to create articles on by-elections. -- Earl Andrew - talk 09:43, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is not that much to write about, it looks like just pointless article duplication --Cloveious 08:15, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sure there is. -- Earl Andrew - talk 04:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Saint-Laurent (federal electoral district)

message: Update the riding map, the map has all the ridings prior to the redistribution and has Saint-Laurent-Cartierville coloured in, instead of Saint-Laurent since the Cartierville portion was merged into a new riding known as Ahuntsic-Cartierville.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.70.33.66 (talk) 16:13, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map outdated
Talk:The Death of the West

message: This page doesn't mention that this book is obviously very white supremacist. Can we add information about it on the page, or at least add related categories?
--Amadeus1928 (talk) 06:58, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racism
Talk:Canajoharie (village), New York

message: the article Canajoharie (town), New York says this "The town means "kettle-shaped hole in the rocks" in the local Native American language."  Which is it? --Awiseman 21:51, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canajoharie meaning 
Talk:Chaim Tzvi Teitelbaum

message: 207.127.40.3 -- I was going to do some copyediting here, and I appreciate your efforts, but I'm not sure if this subject is really significant enough to include in Wikipedia.  Can you add something to explain why Chaim Tzvi Teitelbaun is noteworthy other than being related to some other people? Ehlkej 01:10, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of content
Talk:Closed sessions of the United States Senate

message: Can someone please elaborate on why congress had a closed session pertaining to Nicaragua on April 23, 1983? I'm not really sure what this is referring to. I don't think simply "Nicaragua" is sufficient. Jasongetsdown 02:20, 3 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicaragua 

message: Executive sesssions are often closed to the public and often classified. What's the difference between these and "closed sessions"? I ask because there are many, many executive sessions (or at least were in the 1940s, which is my period of research) which are apparently not "closed sessions" in the definition used here. --Fastfission 23:31, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Closed v. Executive sessions?

message: Per Congress.gov and official Twitter channels the Senate is now in Closed Session on October 23, 2020.  This is presumably regarding the nomination of Amy Coney Barrett but noting it here and I'll let someone with better sourcing add it to the page Phil (talk) 17:10, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  57th Closed Session
Talk:Fritz the Cat (film)

message: This article has had a maintenance tag in the "Critical reception" section since November 2014. This section is probably inadequate based on the coverage in secondary sources of this film.  You're the one who added the "expansion" tag—do you know of specific omissions, or have specific reasons to believe the section is insufficient? I also note that there is no discussion of Themes, which is a large omission for a Featured film article. This article should be expanded accordingly. I think the Plot section also needs examination for being overly long. --Laser brain (talk) 14:02, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reception 

message: That is one huge article for a 1970s cartoon. 90.249.136.231 (talk) 17:25, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  overly detailed?
Talk:The Omega Directive

message: I'd fix it myself but I need sleep...the chronology of this episode is all out of order. Subtly, but still wrong.
Lots42 06:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology 

message: This episode has been discussed as a particularly notable example of Religion in Star Trek. Perhaps the Reception section could be expanded to examine this? Production information about the intent and development of the episode could also be interesting. -- 109.76.132.42 (talk) 14:20, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion
Talk:Scappoose, Oregon

message: I added a link to West coast shoe as they had been listed as a former industry.   Actually they are alive and well and making shoes as they have since 1918.   They speicalize in custom made heavy leather work boots, which are rather good.   I own a couple pairRvannatta 19:35, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: West Coast Shoe

message: Currently the article reads "(pronounced /ˌSCA pu:se/)" and the pronunciation symbols are linked to Help:IPA for English, yet the system of transcription used, whatever it is, is not that explained on that Help page, and does not appear to me to be IPA at all; it may be some form of "ASCII IPA" from pre-Unicode Usenet days, but it is not clear to me how to pronounce it, nor how to correct it. --Haruo (talk) 23:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just called a realtor there and corrected it. kwami (talk) 22:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation??
Talk:Section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

message: Article is vastly improving.  CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 01:29, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Finally

message: This article incorporates material from Wikibooks' "Canadian Constitutional Law/Charter of Rights and Freedoms"; author was 62.177.177.243. CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 08:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attribution 