Talk:Netscape (web browser)

message: I think it is not a good idea to show screenshots of old Netscape versions (4.x) displaying a recent Wikipedia main page; due to old Netscape's incomplete CSS support, this looks rather horrid - but it wasn't the typical surfing experience when using Netscape 4.x at the height of its success in the nineties. Then-current web pages were typically well adjusted to Netscape and much of the web was still written in HTML 3.2. Therefore I think that screenshots displaying an appropriate historical website would be more fitting here. Gestumblindi 21:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Perhaps the Internet Archive can be useful here. Shinobu 11:13, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to this post by the netscape team the browser is dead, I don't know what to add to the entry for a browser being not supported any longer however.
Newfoundnoise82 (talk) 20:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Netscape Browser dying off 

message: Points it needs to make:
*NN's origins as MOSAIC.
*NN 1-3 popularised the Web  - reasonably good browsers (for the time) heavily promoted, e.g. given away as freebie on mag covers.
*NN 4 was appalling - so bad Netscape Corp gave it away:
**Poor CSS support.
**Non-standard DOM.
**Many bugs, many of which caused crashes, some of which killed the OS (Win 95 / 98).
**IE 4 (not 5) killed NN 4 by being better in almost every way  (although with slightly less advanced version of Javascript language).
*Code handed over to Mozilla foundation, open source.
*NN 6 (there was no 5) based on Gecko (layout engine):
*6.0 buggy
*6.1 OK, 6.2 onwards good.
*NN 7 offered users option to use Gecko or IE engine. Philcha (talk) 07:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs major upgrade

message: The image :Image:Netscape 7 En.PNG is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
The following images also have this problem:
*:File:Netscape9logo.png
*:      File:Netscape9.png
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:05, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Netscape 7 En.PNG

message: Even through a waybacked page AOL blocks Internet access. Fortunately Pavel Schilling times were not Orwellian.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.30.234.150 (talk) 11:22, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The most important one: . Since I'm not logged, no signature, should I care on IPs? No, John Edgar Hoover Building is not located in the Franco–Swiss border.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.30.234.150 (talk) 02:46, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some evidence on the releases information? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Netscape (web browser). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://rdf.netscape.com/roadmap.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.webtools.com/story/printableArticle?doc_id=TLS19981223S0001
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://blog.netscape.com/2007/12/28/end-of-support-for-netscape-web-browsers/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://blog.netscape.com/2008/01/28/netscape-browser-support-extended-to-march-1st/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I propose that Netscape Navigator be merged into Netscape (web browser). I think that the content in the Netscape Navigator article can easily be explained in the context of Netscape (web browser), and the Netscape (web browser) article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Netscape Navigator will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. 95.233.125.136 (talk) 16:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The  and  links end up on Talk:Netscape Navigator, and that page explains the structure as the result of some disputes ten years ago. Just keep it as is, it's not wrong. Actually the old browsers (2, 2.02, and maybe 3) were very different from the browser war crap (4 and later), Netscape Navigator 2 is supposed to cover these versions. No WP:UNDUE in sight, communicator was monstrous, navigator was lean and mean (2 MB binary). –84.46.52.12 (talk) 00:01, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Netscape Navigator 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Netscape (web browser). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140904214146/http://internet-browser-review.toptenreviews.com/the-first-great-internet-browser-war.html to http://internet-browser-review.toptenreviews.com/the-first-great-internet-browser-war.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://sillydog.org/forum/sdt_390-0-asc-15.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080528233756/http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=6596 to http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=6596
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090110115035/http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=7647&redirCnt=1 to http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=7647&redirCnt=1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080327163247/http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=6418 to http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=6418
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090109025041/http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=6926 to http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=6926
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080528233740/http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=6459 to http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=6459
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071015194957/http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=6558 to http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=6558
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090109131928/http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=8525 to http://community.netscape.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?tsn=1&nav=messages&webtag=ws-nscpbrowser&tid=8525
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)