lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Battle of Didgori

message: Army size of 400,000-600,000? in 1121?
First of all use signature.
World population at this time was around 300-400 million, so why not? If not 400-000, at least 300.000 was here, minimal 100.000. And I see you are from Turkey thats why you want huge numbers to be removed, check sources before you post nonsense.
Thank you --RememberDidgori (talk) 15:32, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

message: 400,000 soldiers? really? That army would conquer entire China in a week. What the hell is wrong with you people? Just check former battles of Artuqids and other Seljuks. Their largest army number around 10,000 with merging forces. Also, I'm wondering that which Muslim chronicles say 400,000 - 600,000? Just put a source or I'm gonna remove that. User without username (talk) 12:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously what kind of page is this? 

message: change "worship Satan" to "hail(zukoken) Satan" Clutchesy (talk) 14:38, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 15:49, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 March 2023
Talk:Battle of Krtsanisi

message: Just dropping some more sources here that specifically state that Georgia and Tblisi were (re)conquered, apart from the latter being sacked, which was already stated in the article.
I can post more if needed, but I'm sure that Yarshater and Axworthy are sufficient. Overwise its kinda overkill, placing 5+ sources.
Bests - LouisAragon (talk) 01:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just dropping some sources here
Talk:Cheat cartridge

message: I merged from Game Enhancer; see there for some history (Playstation section). — brighterorange (talk) 20:55, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: Cheat cartridges are unfortunately a thing of the past.  All consoles and portables starting with the Microsoft Xbox use unbreakable digital signatures to ensure that unauthorized software never runs on the system, at least without hardware modification or a software bug.  Unless RSA gets broken sometime soon, that is. -- Myria 23:09, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  No more cheat cartridges 

message: There is a section on "game enhancers" for PSX but there is no mention of "caetla".  A group of hobbyist programmers in Japan created a replacement ROM for the GameShark called "caetla" (pronounced as ça et la (saw eh la, サエラ)).  This ROM was designed to allow remote debugging of hobby programs for the PSX.  An accidental side effect of this ROM was that it allowed the swap trick to be used to play copies.  Once pirate companies found out about this, they cloned the hardware and this ROM, and changed its name. -- Myria 04:17, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caetla 

message: ocarina (gecko os) for the wii plays the game in the disc slot through ocarina and edits memory addresses, therefor having the same purpose. 82.25.130.155 (talk) 18:23, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ocarina?

message: Can someone say something about the technology used in cheat cartridges? --Abdull (talk) 23:35, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technology 

message: Under the Publisher Reaction heading, the article states that Sega embraced the development of cheat carts and how Nintendo and other MFG's attempted to thwart such devices but states no references for this at all. Leeor net (talk) 14:41, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publisher Reaction 
Talk:Battle of Newtownbutler

message: This article contains a total of 3 references, none of which has even a page number to check the information given.
The section on the numbers of casualties appears highly speculative and is unsourced. It appears, at least in its current state, to be original research and the conclusions reached - with no authoritive source, indeed no source whatever - are dubious.
The editor(s) responsible need to update fully the three references provided and provide sources for the other material they've added to the article. If they have none, the unverifiable information needs to be removed as it contravenes Wikipedia's original research policy. MEDChambers (talk) 22:26, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of sources/original research?
Talk:Siege of Limerick

message: :Limerick in 1651 was split into two sections, English town and Irish town, which were separated by the river Abbey.
I think this is ambigious. Does it mean Limerick was split into two in 1651, or that it was still split into two in 1651. --Philip Baird Shearer 22:52, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Fortified against itself
Talk:And the Ass Saw the Angel

message: Something I don't see mentioned is that, in addition to the books's other qualities, its Gothic aspect is sufficiently exaggerated as to render it extremely funny, but not so over the top as to make it seem merely silly, something that must have taken considerable literary skill to bring off. Presuming I'm not the only one who judges it thus, does anyone know of citable reviews or critiques that can be used to support mentioning this? 87.81.230.195 (talk) 00:07, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Humour 

message: Cave is Australian and infobox states country as Australia but this book was published in UK & US. Shouldn't the article state UK as that was where this book was first published? Where was he when he wrote the book anyway, and was there an edition published in Australia in 1989? SkyMachine (talk) 14:31, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Any way since this discussion doesn't seem to have provoked any response as of yet, for now I will make the change to UK according to WP:BOLD.  SkyMachine (talk) 02:07, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  The "Personal Life" section of the main Nick Cave article suggests he wrote it while living in West Berlin. Mr Larrington (talk) 13:14, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox country
Talk:Annexation of Hyderabad

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure)  Natg 19 (talk) 00:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Annexation of Hyderabad →  – better descriptive title, consistent with other such articles.  Peter Ormond 💬 19:58, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The title is incomplete. It is about "Annexation of Hyderabad", but doesn't mention "annexation by whom"?  Peter Ormond 💬 02:30, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 August 2021 

message: has been making major changes regarding the wording of the article. Before more changes are made, I would like to ask them to discuss the changes here on the talk page so that consensus can be reached. Remember that Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view. Thank-you, Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 16:10, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major changes of wording
Talk:Artsruni dynasty

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 23:13, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: Sourceable version is here. It doesn't mention 1544. If it helps, p.31 does say "That Hemshin was under Ottoman control in the 1520s is confirmed by thecolophon of a manuscript anthology on the poetical works of Nerses Shnorhali and other authors..." but I can't find 1544 anywhere. Doug Weller talk 11:06, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the source does not indicate that the Arstruni dynasty existed or ended then. It doesn't even mention the dynasty. In fact it never uses either word. It just says that Hemshin was in Ottoman hands for the first half of the 16th century. This article doesn't mention Ottomans. Doug Weller talk 11:20, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simonian. "Hamshen Before Hemshin", p. 31. and the 1544 date 

message: This clearly fails WP:RS. Doug Weller talk 11:10, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: First, what does "originally published at a college" mean to you and why would it be acceptable? Secondly, nothing there suggests it was originally published at a college. There's a pargraph in italics which ends with "Published in Wayne State University" and then the blog post "Accoring to the research by Vahan Ishkhanyan and my research". It obviously fails WP:RS. Doug Weller talk 11:16, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of a Wordpress blog 

message: What, in any way, is wrong about my 863 character well cited edit that you must revert it incessantly? You continue to say it does not adhere to WP:RS but dont say why because it is reliable you just want to edit war over it instead of make consensus. Me and User:Doug Weller are working together, so why can’t User:Wikaviani and User:LouisAragon? Cirflow (talk) 04:02, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's possible that you believe that, but what I've been doing is trying to explain to you continually that you are misrepresenting sources, and you still don't get it. Doug Weller talk 11:21, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simonian, Hamamshen dispute
Talk:Honey mustard

message: I created the article, and agree with the merger. I only wrote it because it was listed in the requested articles, and think it might be better served with the mustard article. --El Cid 23:15, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Mustard is a disambig. I changed the target to Culinary mustard. Revert if the disambig is indeed the intended target. - Lucky13pjn 13:46, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:British fortified wine

message: I am not sure about the accuracy of the article, especially with the followings:
Because the target demographic of British Fortified Wine is the indigent, malnourished alcoholic, one might be forgiven for assuming that it is "fortified" with calories, vitamins, minerals, or some other nutritive principle. In a compassionate society this would no doubt be the case. British Fortified Wine, however, is only "fortified" with alcohol.
Hopefully, someone can look at it and see whether it is "nonsense attack" or "original research point of view" on British Fortified Wine.  --Hurricane111 23:25, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Need to verify
Talk:Herbie Mann

message: We need the cover of push push on this page
: Absoflutely! I second that!
::CD cover is now in article on the album. a gatefold scan would be nice as well, but my scanner is too small for the album. What we now need is many more articles on individual albums.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 20:01, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Portal talk:Mexico

message: WikiProject Portals is back!
The project was rebooted and completely overhauled on April 17th, 2018. Its goals are to revitalize the entire portal system, make building and maintaining portals easier, support the ongoing improvement of portals and the editors dedicated to this, and design the portals of the future.
As of May 2nd, 2018, membership is at 60 editors, and growing. You are welcome to join us.
There are design initiatives for revitalizing the portals system as a whole, and for improving each component of portals.  So far, 2 new dynamic components have been developed: Template:Transclude lead excerpt and Template:Transclude random excerpt.
Tools are provided for building and maintaining portals, including automated portals that update themselves in various ways.
And, if you are bored and would like something to occupy your mind, we have a wonderful task list.
From your friendly neighborhood Portals WikiProject. Hope to see you there. Sincerely,      — The Transhumanist    07:37, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice from the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Portals|Portals WikiProject]] 

message: The portal has been expanded with the addition of new Good- and Featured article sections. The article selections listed below were added. Additional expansion, updating and cleanup was also performed. If anyone is interested, please feel free to discuss these changes here. North America1000 14:31, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal expanded 

message: The header image with scrolling takes quite a while to load for me and until it does there's an empty space which pushes the actual text down. Is this really necessary? Nemo 18:51, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Header image
Talk:Battle of Mikata ga Hara

message: I think it would be best if this article were moved to Battle of Mikatagahara (currently, it's a REDIRECT page), because it would follow common naming procedures (e.g. Battle of Sekigahara). Because the REDIRECT page already exists, I want to see if there would be any controversy in moving the page. Douggers 03:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't mind moving this page... though I do think it could be helpful to start a discussion on WP:MOS-JA about setting a standard for this. Part of the reason that spaces or hyphens are used to begin with is because some of these names can be quite long. LordAmeth 02:31, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to Mikatagahara
Talk:Battles of Kizugawaguchi

message: The "Whiteship" listed on Oda's strength section below the 6 Atakebune directs to the article on the 12th century Norman vessel bearing the name. I believe this to be a minor oversight? I do not possess the skills required to change the redirect.  94.3.150.76 (talk) 15:41, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Whiteship"
Talk:Battle of Kōan

message: Is it really supposed to say "80 percent of the Mongol soldiers were either drowned or killed by samurai on the beaches." ? The 'were either drowned..' part makes it seem like the samurai's made the Mongols drown.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.140.235.37 (talk) 14:29, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The main commander of the invasion is Mongol Shinedu. He cooperated with korean and chinese generals. It is unfair that only Mongol-chinese commanded the invasion.--Enerelt (talk) 02:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mongol-China-Korea 

message: "On seeing this circumstances, the Japanese army carried out an all-out attack. Korechika togo, Koretoo Togo, Sukekado Hujiwara and Nagahisa Shimadzu eliminated 100,000 soldiers."
Seriously? That sounds more like fantasy. Are there any sources for this which can be verified?--Anubixx (talk) 19:17, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annihilation of an army of 100,000 men? 
Talk:Ishiyama Hongan-ji War

message: I have begun looking at my sources again, and attempting to revise the article. But none of my sources indicate that the siege only began in 1576. Look at what I have already written. After the original retreat in 1570, elements of Nobunaga's army remained camped out outside the fortress. They worked with the Mori clan fleet to attempt to blockade the fortress, they watched the movements of the Ikki in order to warn Nobunaga of any necessary changes to his strategy, and they sought any opportunity to launch an assault on the fortress.
By 1575, even before you claim the siege began, Kosa (Kennyo) was facing shortages of food and supplies. A siege does not have to involve active direct assaults - more often than not in feudal Japanese sieges, the attackers simply surrounded the castle and blockaded it - this was going on at the Hongan-ji since 1570. A number of my sources list this as being Japan's longest siege, lasting eleven years; if you insist that that is not the case, then I do not know how to reconcile that with my own sources.
If you would like to provide me with your Japanese sources, if they are available, I would be happy to take a look at them. If my Japanese language skills were better, I could rely more heavily on those sources. But I encourage you not to discount English-language scholarship entirely. Japanese scholars, just like Western scholars, are secondary sources, and everyone jumps to conclusions, misinterprets evidence, or neglects certain sources. Turnbull may be a bit shaky, but I trust my other sources implicitly, and I'm afraid I cannot simply throw out what they say in favor of your assurances otherwise. Thank you. LordAmeth 15:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision
Talk:Battle of Ichi-no-Tani

message: * Ensured that this article is: within project scope, tagged for task forces, and assessed for class. 
* This article would benefit from:  expansion, sections (Prelude, The battle, Aftermath), in-text citations. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:35, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008]]
Talk:Battle of Dan-no-ura

message: As the final deciding battle in the Genpei War, the battle of Dan-no-ura is of very high importance. The outcome here truly did determine the course of Japanese history. It is also one of the more interesting and important examples of naval tactics in all of world history. LordAmeth 16:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: High importance

message: when writing about events which were written about in Tales of the Heike, remember that they must be verified with an independent source. This article reads like it was taken straight from the Kakuichi-bon version of that book. Heike is not a reliable source on it's own, and I know it's difficult to find English sources on events from early Japanese history, but we must try. Itsabooknotacourse (talk) 15:45, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  tales of the heike is not a source
Talk:Battle of Bun'ei

message: Tsushima Island of Japan? No. This phrase is wrong. When 1274 CE, Tsushima Island(대마도 or 계림) of Korea. Tsushima Island is consisted of Japan in 1860s. --218.157.30.104 09:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but no. Tsushima was controlled by the Koremune clan, and later the Sō clan of Japanese samurai since at least the 13th century. There were times during which various Korean kingdoms considered it to be a tributary state to Korea, but the primary inhabitants and those ruling the island were Japanese. Japan did not conquer or annex Tsushima in the 1860s, simply changed it from a feudal domain (han) to a prefecture in 1871. LordAmeth 21:38, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tsushima Island of Japan?  

message: Looks like in fact was a mongol victory, only qualify like japanese victory if you count the storms but the human strugle was clearly won by mongols, althought without stragic importance.--Bentaguayre (talk) 19:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mongol tactical victory

message: Recent studies have shown that it is a fake that the Yuan army was defeated by a typhoon (the so-called kamikaze).
The Kamakura forces single-handedly drove the Yuan forces from the land, and many of the Yuan warships were sunk during their retreat.
In the first place, the truth is that the description of kamikaze is based on materials written by priests of temples and shrines, which were in conflict with the samurai over the rights of manors, so they depict the samurai as especially incompetent and claim that they repelled foreign enemies by the power of Shintoism and Buddhism.
In addition, the propaganda during World War II, the God's Country ideology, deified the material in question more than necessary, and the fiction that the Kamakura samurais were weak and that the kamikaze defeated the Yuan forces has been passed down until recently.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 240D:1A:AA2:6200:44EF:C4B0:67C7:F2DB (talk) 01:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The truth is that kamikaze is a fiction written by a Buddhist monk
Talk:Siege of Sanjō Palace

message: I know it's my own article. Please feel free to re-assess. Please. Nevertheless, looking at this article a good amount of time after its creation, I see a long and detailed article that covers just about everything that needs to be said - this is only one battle, not a whole war, after all - and which includes an image and an infobox. B-Class, I'd say. LordAmeth 16:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Self-assessment

message: I think this article conflates two separate parts of the war: the initial coup and abduction of Go-Shirawa (which takes place at the Sanjo Palace) and the later fighting between the Minamoto and Taira outside of the Imperial Palace.--Cckerberos (talk) 23:37, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy
Talk:Battle of Shizugatake

message: from the Shibata Katsuie article:
 "Katsuie had no option but to surrender. Katsuie committed seppuku and set the fire to the castle.
  He implored Oichi to take their daughters and leave, but she decided to follow his death,
  while letting her daughters escape.[1]"
Now when we read this article (Battle of Shizugatake) we are told:
 "Hideyoshi's army pushed Sakuma's forces into a rout and pursued them back to Shibata Katsuie's fortress at Kitanosho Castle (Fukui) in Echizen province.
 They seized the castle but not before Shibata set the keep on fire, killed his family and committed seppuku."
I looked around a bit and found at the website:
http://wiki.samurai-archives.com/Shibata Katsuie
 "Katsuie, who had not so much as lifted a spear in the war personally,
 decided that his cause was lost. He therefore shut himself in the castle and together with his wife, O-Ichi,
 committed suicide while the castle keep burned around him."
Im quite interested in japanese history and know quite a bite about it, but not of this event i'm afraid.
However it appears to me that the one article stating that he(Shibata) killed his family is plausibly not correct with what i've just read and presented here.
Would be approciated if anyone more knowledgeable on on this perticular subject (Shibata & his family's fate) could confirm or dement this.
--Byzantios (talk) 00:17, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  conflicting articles/versions
Talk:Battle of Ormoc Bay

message: The article describes the land-sea battle but the Japanese commander is listed as Tomoyuki Yamashita, the commander of the land forces defending the Philipines who merely requested the reinforcements. The operational command of the Japanese forces engaged was in the hands of the naval commanders.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.218.168.202 (talk) 04:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese Commander 