Talk:Heart of Darkness (video game)

message: What kind of role took "ocean"?
:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ocean_Software  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.7.175.134 (talk) 19:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ocean 

message: IMO, this article needs a fair amount of revision. It needs to be broken up into sections, or at least written a little bit more coherently. I would take a stab at it, but I don't know anything about the game that's not listed here. -Fuzzy 14:56, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style 

message: Joseph Hewitt? His name appears nowhere on the game's page at Moby Games. I'm changing it to Eric Chahi. HorseloverFat 01:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Designer

message: I removed a little, but really, this article sounds like a blurb for the game. I think a full rewrite would be great. 220.152.112.132 12:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: An anon (212.219.101.41) added what was probably vandalism to the article today; I don't know the subject, so I can't say, though. -- Pawl 15:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probable vandalism 

message: During a cut-scene at Amigo Island, the old and wise amigo shows Andy and the others an image of a female amigo with her breasts showing. Is this notable? I was pretty damn shocked to see that in a kids game, though it's hard to really call it that with all the death it has which is really far worse. If you need proof I can get a crappy photo of it as I have the game.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TailsClock (talk • contribs) 21:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boobs lol 

message: I have little idea about how to write and edit wikipedia pages, however I do have knowledge about the game and plenty of sources and I'd like to let you guys know at wikipedia that several items on this page are inaccurate. I believe it used to have more inaccurate content but it was taken out which is a good start but there are little things such as simple wrong names for things like Whisky being misspelled "Whiskey," and strange names for things used like "magic energy" is actually known as "the special power" etc. The main enemy type are also usually referred to as "spectres" which is information I obtained from the manual and the old official website. They are only really called "Dark Souls" by unofficial sources. I don't know how you would cite the manual of the game as a source, or the old official website as it is now offline but I would be happy to rewrite parts of the article to be more accurate and concise. I actually manage a remake of the old official website which contains press releases and official content about the game. The Heart of Darkness page on ru.wikipedia has sections that talk about the characters and the soundtrack too which I could also write up.Luxguin (talk) 03:08, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate information/Source Citations/Rewrite 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Heart of Darkness (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add  after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.amazingstudio.com/HOD/en/BIB_P05.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:32, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: An individual has decided that a video game with an aggregate score of 75% needs a single review at 2 stars as its only listed review for whatever reason. This in no way reflects reception of the game as a whole. I'm asking how many reviews are allowed on the page and what is the standard protocol for deciding which ones should be included. I would imagine that including too many would clutter the page. Is there a reviewer standard for what sources of review are allowed on the pages? Requesting additional assistance. Thank you.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.246.165.74 (talk) 23:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all, don't lie about other editors on the talk page. Boz didn't stop you from adding reviews; he stopped you from removing one without justification. No one even suggested that there are limitations on what reviews you can add. Martin IIIa (talk) 19:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential journalist bias