lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Savoia-Marchetti SM.82

message: The first paragraph says "about 400 built".  The info box says 726+1 built.  The page at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Regia_Aeronautica_aircraft_used_in_World_War_II says 726 were used.
Ayone know what's up?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kitplane01 (talk • contribs) 06:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Number Built

message: Just tweaking the english in the article and I was confused in Operational History with the references to the Marsupiale, which I understood was the SM.75 not the SM.82 can anybody clarify. Should Marsupiale be changed to Canguro ? MilborneOne 16:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources I have found are divided between Marsupiale, Canguro, and not using a name at all. Any idea which one was official, and why two names would be associated with this aircraft? Older English language sources seem to favour Canguro, but newer sources seem to favour Marsupiale. The maintenance manual uses neither, nor do any of the Italian language sources I found that mention the SM.82 Both names should be included in the article, even if to explain that it was used and by who. The Italeri kit (which includes unusually extensive notes on the aircraft) is boxed with both names. Could one name be as a bomber (Marsupial), and one as a transport (Canguro), or was initially the Marsupial, but confusion with the first Marsupial resulted in a name change?  - NiD.29 (talk) 02:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Marsupiale

message: Do we know the date of first flight? Bastie (talk) 12:06, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Italian article is confusing: it gives the year of both first flight and entry into service as 1938, and calls the aircraft "Marsupiale" Bastie (talk) 12:13, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First Flight
Talk:The Needle & Omelet's Done

message: I'm assuming the episode's title is an allusion to Neil Young's 'The Needle & The Damage Done'? If so, should it be mentioned? Watermellonman 16:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: An intrepid user has gone ahead and added this. Case closed, I suppose. Watermellonman 19:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference/Allusion?
Talk:Yury Chaika

message: Russian: "… достаточно привести пример, что на этой неделе со своей должности в Техснабэкспорт был снят член кооператива «Озера» господин Смирнов и переведен на какую-то должность советника и помощника в другой структуре. То есть вы представляете себе, напомню, что Владимир Смирнов был формально главой петербургской топливной компании, когда ее вице-президентом был господин Кумарин. То есть понятно, что члена кооператива «Озера» может снять только другой член кооператива «Озера». И не может снять губернатор Санкт-Петербурга. Так вот, и вот есть вся эта гигантская грязня, в которую падает история с убийством Политковской. Раскрытом. И очевидно, что она станет одним из козырей в игре. .Biophys 22:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow! Colchicum 23:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: Only a suspicion, but still notable if true, so should maybe go in Wikipedia (properly quoted of course):  --Sigmundur (talk) 13:05, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  linkback from Stratfor leaks 
Talk:Those Were the Days (1934 film)

message: ----
Page moved to be consistent with AMG and IMDB (and the article) to 1934. SkierRMH 02:42, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Well - all the VHS packaging and even IMDB credit GH Elliott with performing, but it was not him. This is someone else impersonating him.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.73.85.8 (talk • contribs) 21 March 2008
:Are you able to explain how you know this, given that it's in contradiction to what the obvious sources of information say? --Paul A (talk) 08:34, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One definitive article on Elliott's career says: "Another 1934 film, Those Were the Days, purports to include a performance by George [Elliott] singing "The Lady of Laguna".  Indeed, he was credited on the box on its first video release.  But, whoever the singer is, it is not Elliott."   Source -  Ghmyrtle (talk) 12:01, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: G. H. Elliott
Talk:Blue eared pheasant

message: Isn't this the right name? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:51, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I get it. It's a kind of eared pheasant, not a pheasant with blue ears. Never mind. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 03:19, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue-eared pheasant
Talk:Waigeo brushturkey

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Megapode which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 16:30, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Australian Brush-turkey which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 16:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Why do we write "brushturkey" when the googlable sources I could find use "brush-turkey"?   I assume Mr.Bruijn might have pushed words together when he was writing in Dutch and I would not dream of questioning his ability to write in Dutch even if it means inventing new words which for all I know it doesn't.   But in English I think "brush-turkey" looks more conventional or even, if you find dashes excessively teutonic, what is wrong with "brush turkey"?   
No, I know it's not very important, but it's (almost) the most interesting thought I've had since the last cup of coffee.   Regards Charles01 (talk) 16:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:Birds generally follows the International Ornithological Congress's common names.  Their justification for their spelling of compound names is here.  It seems to be mostly making the name distinctive and showing clearly that the Australian Brush Turkey isn't a turkey. —JerryFriedman  (Talk) 22:30, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Brushturkey or Brush-turkey
Talk:Copper pheasant

message: There is a cladogram in this article (pg 5).
For maps, there is a distribution map on the bird's IUCN page. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 03:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cladogram & map resources
Talk:Bornean peacock-pheasant

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Palawan Peacock-pheasant which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 02:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Red-billed brushturkey

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Australian Brush-turkey which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 16:45, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Mountain peacock-pheasant

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Palawan Peacock-pheasant which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 02:15, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Tooth-billed bowerbird

message: The IOC name for this species is "Tooth-billed Bowerbird" and the WP Project Birds also uses this capitalisation. Snowman (talk) 14:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:BIRDS doesn't own the bird articles.  All of the articles that the wikiproject has been using "pet admins" to move for them in a continuing WP:FAITACCOMPLI, like this one (see top of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds/Archive 61#Capitalisation), should be moved back and subjected to normal WP:RM discussion.  You know full well that this capitalization scheme advanced by the project has been controversial for nine years running.  Furthermore, Wikipedia never endorsed IOC names as "official" or a "standard" here, and doing so would present significant WP:NOR problems.  IOC names frequently conflict with WP:Article titles policy because they are not the WP:COMMONNAMES.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  23:39, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalisation
Talk:FREECOG

message: FREECOG is extremely notable as a pioneer in the early days of the ACM.  Few books about NRMs don't mention it.  I'm quite surprised at the state of this entry.  Not a single source.  Wow.PelleSmith (talk) 03:35, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Extremely notable

message: Didn't Freecog later become Citizen's Freedom Foundation? According to the Ted Patrick article this is the case. This article should be renamed if this is the case.
Zambelo (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citizen's Freedom Foundation 

message: The section Cult Awareness Network#History pretty much has all the information in this article, but in context of the overall history of CAN.  Any objections to merging this article there to better serve readers?  They would not have to look in two places for the same info.Borock (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Pamela Salem

message: This is said to be 1950 and 1944. 2A00:23C7:9985:1701:6833:8A84:CDFB:7522 (talk) 11:12, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: The wrong General Hospital was listed, and I changed it to the British TV series. 2601:18C:9083:A9D0:4410:EFCA:7B4:8F45 (talk) 13:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Hospital
Talk:Harold McCluskey

message: "He died of causes"?  Seriously, even if there's a dispute over certain facts, do you want THAT to be part of the page for any amount of time?  Asat (talk) 00:51, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: http://www.ustur.wsu.edu/Case_Studies/Narratives/0246_McCluskey.php  --Stone (talk) 09:17, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case study 

message: The article has two different dates for the accidental exposure: April 24, 1976, and August 30, 1976.  Does anyone know which is correct?   Thanks.   Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 04:40, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of accident 

message: "Harold Ralph McCluskey (July 12, 1912 – August 17, 1987) was a chemical operations technician at the Hanford Plutonium Finishing Plant located in Washington State who is known for having survived, on August 30, 1976, exposure to the highest dose of radiation from americium ever recorded. He became known as the 'Atomic Man'."
The phrasing here is very clumsy due to the abrupt insertion of the date of the accident. It should be split into two sentences. 94.173.137.65 (talk) 19:53, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary Phrasing 

message: "Harold McCluskey was exposed to at least 37 MBq of americium-241 and nitric acid." I feel that the phrasing of this sentence is a little odd and inconsistent. The becquerel is a unit of radioactivity, but the sentence is written as if it is a measure of mass or volume, especially with the mention of nitric acid. I will have a go at changing this, but I would be happy if someone more scientifically qualified than me wants to update it further. Binar (talk) 11:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accident
Talk:Lady Amherst's pheasant

message: The following anecdotal observations were in the main article. They're not referenced or encyclopaedic so probably ought to be removed entirely. I've left them here in case the original authors return and want to cite them properly:
* Edit: 1 male has been sighted in Crudwell by multiple residents.  So at least 1 wild bird is still alive in the UK.
* Angela King was amazed to spot one of the birds strolling across her lawn in Crudwell, Wilts. 26 September 2017
* At least 2 other residents in the area have seen and photographed the bird.  So there is still at least 1.
CharlesDraper (talk) 11:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Observations in the UK
Talk:Blood pheasant

message: The original name of Ithagenis was not blood pheasant, but rather, blood snow partridge. This is in reference to the micro habitat Ithagenis frequents foraging near the snow line as it migrates with the seasons. Blood snow is also referred to as watermelon snow. 
Blood snow partridges are perfectly camouflaged in blood snow. 
It is likely that this archetypal taxon  inhabiting what is now the Tibetan plateau for millions of years, evolved together with their peculiar niche before the birth of the Himalayan mountains had gotten underway.
Ancestors of Ithagenis were likely subtropical forest adapted landfowl related to the fossil taxon Telecrex.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinudjem (talk • contribs) 08:11, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Species belonging to the genus  Ithagenis are commonly referred to as “blood pheasants”. This came about rather recently and has obscured something most compelling about the taxon.
These enigmatic high elevation landfowl are known by Tibetan, Mongolian & Chinese ethnics, in their respective languages, as blood snow partridge. This is more appropriate than blood pheasant because Ithagenis is not a pheasant and it is not blood-colored. Ithagenis are partridge-like landfowl were named traditionally, in reference to habitat preference & behavioral ecology of the blood snow partridge super species complex. Pinudjem (talk) 08:20, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blood snow
Talk:Frankfort Cemetery

message: Soon will be adding images of famous graves in the cemetery that my husband and I took today. Plan to return and take more after I find the location of the graves. I welcome suggestions about how to layout the page once we get the images and new text in the article. FloNight♥♥♥ 00:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grave pics

message: I plan to do a complete re-write of the article. Bear with me because it will take me days to get referenced content and images in a good format. FloNight♥♥♥ 11:36, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-write
Talk:Crested partridge

message: I've heard in a forum that Megapodes, Guttera guineafowl, Roul Roul, Mearn's Quail and Ithaginis Blood Pheasants are polyandrous and that the Polyplectrons' ancestors were also polyandrous. This person on the forum is Kermit Blackwood, who has done comprehensive work on gallinate birds. His research revealed that Polyplectrons, Galloperdix, and Haematortyx should be part of a distinct family of galliform birds.
But perhaps Kermit's most impressive hypothesis is about the Green Peafowl. His research revealed that the Green Peafowl is actually a complex of several distinct species. He also discovered that the Green Peafowl are also monogamous (Red Data Book says he suggested this in 2000). Peafowl are also part of their own family with the Argus "pheasants".
Much of Kermit's work would be currently labelled as citation needed or no WP:RS, due to the lack of any RS right now. However, his findings will be published in the next few years. In 2000 he showed some of his literature to the Red Data Book, which accepted his hypotheses, not including anything listed above except for the monogamous thing, those hypotheses were not even made, but all sorts of other crucial information he had by far confirmed (unusual Yunnan form of Green Peafowl, Imperial Pheasant being a hybrid).Frankyboy5 03:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Polyandrous?

message: I am confused on the scientific name for this species.. i see it spelled 2 different ways, which is correct? on here i see it spelled as Rollulus rouloul and some other places, including the zoo i just went to spells it Rollulus roulroul on its species sign.. So which is the right name? --Ltshears (talk) 14:11, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scientific Name 
Talk:Invariances

message: Re/ the flexibility of the libertairan position expressed in "Invariances", i'm not quite sure it's as simple as you put it. Nozick specifically affirms that, according to him, the most important level what concerns enforcement remains that of the ethics of respect. See, for example: "rights of noninterference are what are to be most strongly mandated and enforced, thereby preserving room for people to pursue their own ends and goals" (p. 282). Though he reckons that his position his that of a minority, he develops (in a footnote)the idea that political/ethical dissent itself is "existing for a good social reason"... Besides, from the divergences of approach and general method in his books (including EL -whose approach is mostly aesthetic/symbolic), his own confession (see the interview with Julian Sanchez, linked on the ASU page, where he clearly dismisses claims of his abandoning libertarianism for democracy), and comments by a few libertarians philosophers who knew him (eg, Narveson & Lomasky), he (& the message in Invariances) was much more radical libertarian than is suggested in your article. Do you think you could tone down that part a bit? M-la-maudite 16:32, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 comments

message: If the section headings in this article are titles of sections or chapters of the book, I think it should say so.
: 
If not, then those capital initial letters (other than the first letter of each section heading) are incorrect, per WP:MOS. Michael Hardy (talk) 04:52, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: ...and now I've altered the format accordingly, after looking at it via Google Books. Michael Hardy (talk) 17:36, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009 comments
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Michaelas10

message: Michaelas10's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 16:33, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Hi. It's already been about 45 minutes past its scheduled closing date. I think it should be closed, but only if I am correct. So, what do you think? The candidate already has over 90% support, and I think it's time for a bureaucrat. It was supposed to close at 16:26, and now it's about 17:10. Should it close? The last edit to the page was at about 16:45, about 20 minutes after its scheduled closing. Thanks. AstroHurricane001(Talk+Contribs+Ubx) 17:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  close?
Talk:Ticket machine

message: 17 pictures for this amount of text is excessive. The differences in ticket booths around the world doesn't really need to be showed unless there are some unique and notable facets, in which case they should also be mentioned in the prose itself.--Crossmr (talk) 04:37, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  pictures 
Talk:Van Hammer

message: My browser is preventing me from copying and pasting the relevant sentences, with links and references. Somebody with a real computer want to get on that?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by InedibleHulk (talk • contribs) 23:33, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Being kicked out of The Flock should be in "The Flock" section. 

message: The article currently has an uncited claim that Hildreth "...is currently an asset manager for a small commodity hedge fund focusing on European Natural Gas spread trading." It used to say that he owned a sex shop. Quite different career paths. Which, if either of these is true, and does anybody have a source for it? -Mooreon131 (talk) 03:06, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd totally forgotten I'd tagged that. Thanks for the reminder. Problem solved. It can be re-added, IF it is sourced. Same with sex shop owner, zookeeper, astronaut or president. InedibleHulk (talk) 18:20, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Career
Talk:Rauli Virtanen

message: The text of this article appears to be lifted directly from coolvision.fi, and could be a copyright violation (see WP:C). However, the page was created by someone with the username Allanvirtanen, whose total of six contributions (as of 2007-03-27) were all made on 2007-03-17. It is possible that this user is the author of the content at coolvision.fi, and would therefore be entitled to copy the content here. If this is the case, please place a notification here in order to avoid a false alarm deletion of this page. -Tobogganoggin talk 22:43, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation?
Talk:Blondie (radio series)

message: Amazingly, I'm being forced to point out that two sections about topics not related to the article should be removed from the article.128.151.71.7 (talk) 13:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: How is the "Blondie" series, also starring Penny Singleton and Arthur Lake not related to the article? M.Bitton (talk) 13:37, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's *related* in the sense that it can be mentioned.  "The radio series stars Penny Singleton and Arthur Lake, who also starred in the popular film series." or something like that.  But a whole *section* devoted to it is extraneous and unnecessary for the subject at hand and belongs on an overview of Blondie as a whole or as a franchise, etc.  Not here.  The TV show can also get a quick mention ("Arthur Lake" again played Dagwood on the first Blondie TV series.") but also does not need its own section *here*.    Everything this article needs on these two subjects can be included in the main body.  This should be obvious.128.151.71.7 (talk) 11:56, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing material not related to the article
Talk:Farrukhabad

message: Farrukhabad is not the original name of this city, Original name was ApraKashi and was changed in 1713 by the Mughal Invader Banghas Khan in the name his reigning emperor Farrukhsiyer. Akki Ayush (talk) 14:00, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Farrukhabad or ApraKashi?
Talk:Kadawunu Poronduwa

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:31, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 
Talk:Auke

message: I've renamed this article "Auke people."  I created it under the title "Auke Indians." --Evb-wiki 02:08, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Renamed article

message: If we could get a map or better yet an  image of some actual Auke people for this, I think we could upgrade it to start class. 21:32, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a map linked on Tlingit showing the territories of each kwaan; we can't use that map as an illustration, but if the boundaries shown could be adapted over to whatever Alaska Panhandle basemap there happens to be in Wikipedia/WikiCommons, that would solve that fairly quickly; I'm not good at making neat-looking graphics myself though....Skookum1 (talk) 23:47, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: stub
Talk:Criticism of Greenpeace

message: Greenpeace accepts bitcoin donations and at least unofficially uses bitcoin. This support for bitcoin is surprising since it consumes roughly 24TWh annually, comparable to a small country. Using traditional banking would be thousands of times more environment friendly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:20C0:5570:210D:47FB:B904:6866 (talk) 01:11, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greenpeace support for bitcoin not mentioned 
Talk:Taku people

message: As it's redlinked, obviously no article yet; and by its title it should be for the government of the Taku River Tlingit, who are in British Columbia vs the Inland Tlinkit/Inland Tlingit of the Yukon Territory (whose government, or one of them, is the Teslin Tlingit Council.  Posting this here, partly because I don't know if these are the same Taku as the ones in Alaska, and also so when it's no longer redlinked it can be put up as a See Also; and yeah, the title is inappropriate here and should be Taku people or Taku (tribe)Skookum1 01:55, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Skookum1, point take re article name. As you can see, I renamed it Taku people.  Cheers. --Evb-wiki 02:05, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

text: According to the source cited, "[t]he Tlingit that inhabited the area that is now the City and Borough of Juneau at the time of the first European contact were the Auk, Taku, and Sumdum peoples."  So, yes, I believe so. --Evb-wiki 03:14, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it'll have to be checked with/about the Taku River Tlingit if that means the same thing as the Taku Tlingit; I'm not from that part of BC so wouldn't know....Skookum1 03:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Taku River Tlingit First Nation]]