Talk:Dan Cronin

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Daniel Cronin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151002193917/http://www.ilga.gov/senate/Senator.asp?MemberID=980 to http://www.ilga.gov/senate/senator.asp?MemberID=980
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304112652/http://www.ilga.gov/senate/SenatorBills.asp?GA=96&MemberID=1422 to http://www.ilga.gov/senate/SenatorBills.asp?GA=96&MemberID=1422
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304114253/http://www3.illinois.gov/PressReleases/ShowPressRelease.cfm?SubjectID=1&RecNum=12991 to http://www3.illinois.gov/PressReleases/ShowPressRelease.cfm?SubjectID=1&RecNum=12991
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:46, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Daniel Cronin moved to Dan Cronin and DAB created at Daniel Cronin. per discussion consensus, WP:COMMONNAME, and WP:PRIMARY. Normally I would agree that we should have a second discussion about whether or not the outfielder or this politician are the primary "Dan"s, but it is extremely unlikely from the sources and pages that it would fall in the dead outfielder's favor. Please, let's avoid the needless bureaucracy and just execute all the unambiguous moves at once. I am not changing anything about Daniel Cronin (bishop), as I believe there is no consensus here for it, and it was not covered by the nom. It is therefore more ambiguous. Please start another RM about this other related issue if you feel strongly about it. Wikipedia policy and guidelines support unambiguous moves which forego needless process for the sake of process. If you have any concerns, feel free to bring them up on my talk as always. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Shibbolethink (♔ ♕) 12:52, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Daniel Cronin →  – Nickname 'Dan' is more commonly used in sources. See WP:NICKNAME. Edge3 (talk) 23:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:51, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: So, if I understand correctly, I think what you're suggesting is exactly the same as I'm suggesting: move Daniel Cronin to Dan Cronin, and move the dab page Dan Cronin to Daniel Cronin. So essentially, simply swap Dan Cronin and Daniel Cronin. If people agree, I'm happy to do the moves. Dr. Vogel (talk) 15:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, exactly as you originally suggested and, again, if consensus skews towards use of the form Dan Cronin (politician), I would also support "Dan Cronin" redirecting to the Daniel Cronin dab page. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 15:51, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the politician would be more relevant than the 19th century baseball player, but we'll see if anyone disagrees. Dr. Vogel (talk) 15:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 October 2021