Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Derbyshire

message: I have started a project for missing civil parishes at User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes. These exist as a redirect only but should have separate articles:
* Draycott and Church Wilne
* Heanor and Loscoe
* Shirland and Higham
* Shottle and Postern
A total of 7, see User:Crouch, Swale/Missing parishes (1)#Derbyshire. Crouch, Swale (talk)  17:07, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated. Regards --The Equalizer (talk) 15:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated. Regards The Equalizer (talk) 09:04, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Complete. Regs, The Equalizer (talk) 07:40, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parishes project 

message: Our Article Alerts section has just highlighted the 'proposed deletion' of Template:Derbyshire districts map which, to be frank, I was completely unaware of until now.
Being interactive, I think it could be really useful, so I have tweaked and added it to the top of our Project Page. (It was created by User:RobinLeicester).
If anyone wishes to comment on the Deletion Discussion, please make your views known here. Thanks. Nick Moyes (talk) 21:16, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition (and proposed Deletion) of  [[Template:Derbyshire districts map]] 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Rolls-Royce Marine Power Operations#Requested move 30 March 2022 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 20:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Rolls-Royce Marine Power Operations#Requested move 30 March 2022]] 

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:43, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: A discussion is ongoing at Template talk:Infobox English county#Proposal: remove the ethnicity section which is likely of interest to this project. The original proposal is for straight removal of the ethnicity field from the template but keeping the population field.  A modification to the proposal includes this also but seeks the addition of two optional, undefined statistical fields within the non-metropolitan and unitary authority sections of the county infoboxes — at present there are no demographic statistical fields, other than population under these headings. Rupples (talk) 23:48, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed county infobox template change