lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crossness Pumping Station

message: ===Pictures===
There are several Geograph images available here (these are all freely available for adding to Commons).
As of today there were three:
#an exterior view (not very pretty!)
#a classic interior view of the painted ironwork
#one of the working engine in motion (ie various parts blurred!).
EdJogg 16:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference material available 

message: There are several Geograph images available here (these are all freely available for adding to Commons).
As of today there were three:
#an exterior view (not very pretty!)
#a classic interior view of the painted ironwork
#one of the working engine in motion (ie various parts blurred!).
EdJogg 16:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: According to this news website, as of May 2008 the funding was in hand and only a dispute over an access road stood in the way of the restoration proceeding.
This needs to be brought up-to-date, and the news incorporated into the article.
EdJogg (talk) 15:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: News
Wikipedia talk:Contents/Portals/Archive 3

message: This page is linked to from the Main Page under the label "All portals"; this doesn't really work if people are removing functioning portals from the list here.  We need to hash out some sort of arrangement that won't leave the smaller portal orphaned off somewhere. Kirill Lokshin 23:04, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  All portals, or just some? 

message: The Atlas portal was removed from the geography portal. I don't agree, since geography is about more than continents alone. Atlas is clearly a geographical portal (as it is also a portal under history]]. Electionworld (prev. :Wilfried) (talk 10:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No portal should be listed more than once on this page. The geography section is currently occupied entirely by places.   I agree that Atlas is a hard one to classify.-gadfium 19:49, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Portal:Atlas]] 

message: Let's call a short moratorium on changing this page's layout too much until we can work out a process for addressing some design differences. Quiddity suggested, and I second, starting a project to work out some look and feel conventions for high-level pages like this. I'm sure they all won't be the "same," but it would be nice to have a go-to point of reference for what's what.  Any more takers? Rfrisbietalk 17:27, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page layout & project 

message: The Main Page links to Portal:Browse.  This page should not act like it doesn't exist.  I suggest discussing some "merge" issues at Portal talk:Browse#Page layout & project. Rfrisbietalk 17:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portal:Browse 

message: It looks like consensus is for the current blue version's layout.  I'll be porting some of the content differentiation over to that page - feel free to revert any changes you don't like.  Also, could you move the accent section away from the outer border a bit (leaving some margin space), just to see what it looks like?  --The Transhumanist 22:05, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  time to wrap this up 

message: I've redirected Portal:List to here, and imported some of its content formatting.  Thanks for moving the accent box out, I think it looks better, but I'll leave that up to you to decide. --The Transhumanist 03:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge complete 

message: Move. Duja 14:10, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Support - seems slightly clearer than "Browse", and follows the recent renaming of Wikipedia:Browse to Wikipedia:Categorical index. --Quiddity 18:50, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Zhanqiao Pier

message: For Example:
The  English Corner is located at the base of the pier.  While  facing the  pier,  looking out  over the  ocean, you can find a group of foriegners and locals on your left hand side sitting under a pine tree near the W/C.  This is the oldest ongoing English Corner in Qingdao dating back to the mid 1980's.
:You've already been warned multiple times for WP:SPAM. Continue and you'll be blocked and the site will be blacklisted globally from Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Canal Area, San Rafael, California

message: I think that the two articles should be merged, or every neighborhood in the city of San Rafael should have it's own page. swat671 08:42, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion 

message: After working on the article today, I propose removing the following templates: 



 
--Hjal 10:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements in progress 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jcam415 (talk) 00:16, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CALIFORNIA DREAMING, THE GOLDEN STATE'S RHETORICAL APPEALS
Talk:Timeline of peptic ulcer disease and Helicobacter pylori

message: As I was discussing the FL candidacy of Timeline of tuberous sclerosis, I came to notice that the layout used used on this page was, at best, subpar. Using a table makes little sense when other formats are more useful. Since the other timeline looks like it will use a definition list format (see Help:List for how it works and WP:LAME for an example), I'm considering switching this one. I've made a converted version at User:Circeus/temp, any thoughts? Circeus 18:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks nice.  The only problem I see is that is hard to see what counts as a different event in each year.  Could you use bulleted lists or a larger paragraph separation to distinguish different events? --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 19:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Don't mean to dissent, but I kind of liked the old format.   The blue shading and lines made it look more professional.  Gastro guy 06:22, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  format 

message: "Tarnopolskaya observes that penicillin cures some peptic ulcers.[13]"
This source is from a book, so I can't look at it.  But "this is a cure" is a conclusion, not an observation.  It would be like saying "he watched the actions of George Bush and observed that he made the best of all presidents".  He didn't observe that; at best he concluded that.  "Someone took penicillin and got better" can be observed, but the causal relation between the two cannot.
I just saw someone quote this from the Wikipedia article on Slashdot to bolster the claim that the drug companies conspired to hide it.  After all, we "observed that it cured" ulcers in 1955.
I'm deleting this unless someone can demonstrate that 1) the book actually says that he "observed" something that can't be observed, 2) the book isn't just worded imprecisely and really means something like "observed that it seems to", and 3) the book is a reliable source despite containing this very dubious statement. Ken Arromdee (talk) 06:35, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this? 

message: From the background section: "Now, all major gastrointestinal societies agree that H. pylori is the primary nondrug cause of PUD worldwide, and advocate its eradication as essential to treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers."   I am aware that some diseases, such as smallpox and polio can in principle be 'eradicated' if the disease-causing vector has no non-human host.  Since numerous animals have stomaches, I wonder if any of them might have the human-version of h. pylori.  Hal9009az (talk) 22:12, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This article uses the term "eradication" in reference to eliminating an individual infection, rather than worldwide eradication of the disease. Perhaps this would be better described as elimination. No guidelines are recommending complete global eradication of H pylori. Rytyho usa (talk) 06:16, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this true?
Talk:Cumberland Terrace

message: John Updike lived in Cumberland Terrace for a year.
http://www.updikereview.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Plath.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:36DF:56F0:808C:7C29:D0F6:1666 (talk) 02:40, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Bangladesh Khilafat Andolan

message: Dear Editor of Wikipedia,
Tuaha Bin Habib, Obayed Ullah Majumdar and Mewlana Ishhak are neither leader nor even any primary members of Bangladesh Khelafat Andolon.
Best regards
Kazi Azizul Huq
International Affairs Secretary
Bangladesh Khelafat Andolon
314/2, Kellar Morr, Lalbagh,
Dhaka-1211
Phones: 
Head Office:(880-2)7320078
International Deptt.:(880-2)9881436
Fax: 9881436
E-mail: khelafat@dhaka.net
Following part of information in Wikipedia on Bangladesh Khelafat Andolon is not correct:-
QUOTE
Human Rights groups have pointed out that amongst the leadership of the movement there are several war criminals from the time of the 1971 Liberation War. Such examples are Tuaha Bin Habib (former member of the Central Shanti Committee), Obayed Ullah Majumdar and Mewlana Ishhak (who both took part in the cabinet of Malek).
UNQUOTE
Any chance that the Maulana Ishak mentioned in the document the same as this Ishak Faridi or the Ishaq Madani mentioned in this document: ? --Soman 09:20, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Naachtun

message: Need coordinates of the site. grr (talk) 04:14, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 
Talk:Variety, the Children's Charity

message: Per http://www.usvariety.org/about.html the charity in the US alone is a multi-million dollar organisation with 27 chapters in 19 states and is established worldwide. Hardly NN. I'm adding detail to the article now. Tonywalton  | Talk 08:56, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Variety Club Awards have been an important part of show-business recognition awards, for outstanding performances in various media, for many decades. They need to be mentioned in this article. Softlavender (talk) 20:18, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs to include the Variety Club Awards 

message: if anyone besides me is interested in this page, perhaps we can discuss what to do with it.  the organization is, i think, actually quite notable, and needs an article.  however, this article was in abysmal shape before i started editing, and is still pretty unsatisfactory to me.  i don't want to do any more surgery on it, though, without asking for some comments.  please let me know what you think.  meanwhile, i'm going to look for more sources and try to replace the promotionalism with some actual encyclopedic material. — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 00:45, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  the state of this page
Talk:Distributivity (order theory)

message: I've copied much of the "Distributivity laws for complete lattices" section into an new article completely distributive completely distributive lattice and marked it as a stub. Perhaps it would be better to call the new article complete distributivity or completely distributive lattice, but I used the link used in this article as a starting point. Please help make that article better and, in particular, add citations. --Malcohol 08:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In the light of this, I'm planning on removing much of the more specific content on complete distributivity from this article. Are their any objections to this?--Malcohol 09:28, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done--Malcohol 14:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

text: No, it might be the case that a and b are incomparable to x but nonetheless a \wedge b \leq x. A specific counterexample can be found by considering the lattice M_3.82.19.52.143 (talk) 21:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Flight of the Eisenstein

message: Hi, been slowly updating this page. Please don't remove any of the info while I'm in the process of adding up some more paragraphs.
210.4.41.94 16:16, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Nathaniel Garro and Iacton Qruze have never been explicitly stated as 'founding members' of their respective legions. Garro is definately a terran born marine, while Qruze is only possibly (he is also referred to as 'The Last Cthonion' in Galaxy in Flames) so. Being terran born does not make Garro an original member of the Dusk Raiders, only a marine that predates Mortarion's discovery. This article is also full of author's own supposition and critique, which I'll remove now.Primarch 06:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating myself
Talk:Completely distributive lattice

message: For a set X, the left adjoint of the union map from the set of lower sets of the power set of X to the power set of X sends the empty set to the empty set and each nonempty subset Y to the lower set consisting of the empty set and singletons containing elements of Y. That makes the power set a completely distributive lattice. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 15:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left adjoint
Talk:Galaxy in Flames

message: No reason all Horus Heresy books should not be on the same page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.126.163.20 (talk) 15:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: "Elements of the Luna Wolves, World Eaters and Emperor's Children legions, refusing to turn against the Emperor as their fellows had, fight back against the traitors..."
Not sure that is really accurate.  As the novel lays it out, they are not given a choice for the most part.  Instead they are picked beforehand as those who are unlikly to turn and when then even realize what is going on, it is already after they have been betrayed.  So they are really defending themselves.  The assumption is that they *are* loyal and would never turn, but most are not given the chance to test that. Aristoi 20:32, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I suggest altering it to : "Loyalist elements of the Luna Wolves, World Eaters and Emperor's Children legions, fight against the traitors..."60.240.205.71 07:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Aristoi 20:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loyalists vs Traitors 

message: Could this artical be updated with more information? Seems a bit small compared to other Wiki articals on the books that follow this one. Cheers. 203.109.162.65 07:31, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info? 
Talk:Paramatman

message: Does the Rigveda really mention paramatman? Mitsube (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If the Jivatman and the Paramatman are known to be one and the same than how can can the word "Paramatman" conjure the concept of God in a monotheistic sense ? does the monotheistic religions consider God & the individuals to be one & the same ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.1.130 (talk) 11:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm placing the controversial sentence on this page until some sort of resolution is reached to this now year-long (August 2009-August 2010) NPOV dispute. In my view, this sentence might be true but contains too many weasel words to be clear enough to remain on the page, namely, "invariably," which is not cited, "God in a monotheistic sense," as Brahman is not the Christian God, and Hinduism is not a monotheistic religion, and especially the phrasing of, "may be applied as epithets," which is not only vague but also does not fit with the rest of the page as it loses any distinction between any of the, "Gods worshiped by Hindus." Perhaps someone will come along to incorporate this idea somehow, later on. Here's the removed sentence,
"The word invariably conjures the concept of an infinite, non-corporeal God in a monotheistic sense, even though Bhagavan or Ishvara may be applied as epithets to many divine forms of God worshiped by Hindus."
makeswell (talk) 16:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Advaita & Paramatman
Talk:Nishan-e-Imtiaz

message: This article should be merged into a new article (to be created soon!) titled Order of Imtiaz.
Zain Sadullah Khan 09:13, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Can someone more in the know determine if the following is correct? "A special pecial grade"Srednuas Lenoroc (talk) 16:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:15, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A special pecial grade" 

message: "roughly equivalent to Presidential Medal of Freedom (United States) and Order of the British Empire (United Kingdom)": I have no problem with giving rough equivalencies for context, it is helpful, but the Presidential Medal of Freedom and Order of the British Empire are widely different.  The Presidential Medal of Freedom is given out only a handful of times per year (sometimes zero), where as the Order of the British Empire goes out to over a thousand people every year (in its various grades, the highest grade, GBE, is comparitively rare).  I would change the article to specify Grand Cross of the Order of the British Empire, but I do not know whether it is true that the Nishan-e-Imtiaz is really that rare.  (If it's the opposite and there are thousands of appointees, it would be better to correct it by changing Presidential Medal of Freedom to Legion of Honour.) --145.226.30.81 (talk) 14:30, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rough equivalent
Talk:Adi Shankara bibliography

message: List contains only few of the works, but we need to mention total number of works claiming authorship of Adi Shankara and name of each work. 
Lokesh 2000 06:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Works by Shankaracharya 

message: What is the source for adding a line saying that "His authorship to many of these texts are debated"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krish rdkb (talk • contribs) 06:09, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sources are provided for two of them; I've added a   for "many". Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:14, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can you link the source 

message: Adi shankara 223.181.197.179 (talk) 15:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social adi shankara
Talk:Arcus cloud

message: Since the shelf cloud and roll clouds are subset of the arcus, they should be integrated into this article. This would make a more complete article instead of splitting the information among three articles.
Pierre cb (talk) 04:41, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that the articles are at the moment small, I do not object to merging shelf cloud and roll cloud.  In most areas of the US and Canada, however, shelf cloud is a more common term than arcus cloud.  All information should be retained and nothing lost (that isn't repetitive) if the articles are merged.  Evolauxia (talk) 01:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: About a decade or two ago, it was not uncommon over Toowoomba - about 100 miles inland, but on the eastern edge of The Great Dividing Range - saw it myself when visiting a couple of times, to be told by locals it was fairly regular. Over a decade of drought has since occurred, climate has changed and become hotter locally, and the phenomenon is now most uncommon. It would appear set back slightly west from the edge of the range running roughly parallel to it and stretch from horizon to horizon north to south, depending on humidity, winds and temperature conditions.
Sadly the local country paper has showed almost no interest so searching the net has proved unfruitful - one might find info from the much older printed version, which is much more time consuming. The Chronicle's online indexing system seems to confuse pretty sunrises, flowers, cafes and hamburgers all with that name :-) So unfortunately only PE as far as the rules here go .... but others may be able to follow up on it.
60.242.247.177 (talk) 10:55, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roll Cloud seen in Toowoomba Qld Australia 

message: Hi there,
I encountered the amazing phenomenon of the Arcus cloud while cruising in the Baltic sea.
Luckily I managed to record it with my 360 gear so it is now documented on youtube.
I think it'll be great if you add the link to it so people could actually see and feel what it's like.
Thank you very much,
Barry Abrams, Allin360. 46.117.183.192 (talk) 06:07, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The link to the 360 video is on my youtube channel : allin360 (I am blocked to add it here..) 46.117.183.192 (talk) 06:09, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  We do not link spam from a blocked user. Pierre cb (talk) 13:18, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  360 video of amazing arcus cloud seen while cruising in the Baltic sea
Talk:Taittiriya Upanishad

message: Hi, Upanishads are full of esoteric and terse meaning, communicating original expressions and ideas of upanishads in english is difficult.
I tried my best in this article but language seems too esoteric.
could anybody help in simplification and good formatting?
any help would be appreciated.
Lokesh 2000 13:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language Simplification

message: a user has changed the name to Taithreeya from Taittiriya which was a correct one. please tell me what does Taithreeya mean? it has no meaning. While Taittiriya means belonging to 'tittiri' (which means partridge in english). see Yajnavalkya for why word tittiri got associated with yajurveda. please change the name back to original one.
Lokesh 2000 12:48, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change to Taithreeya 

message: Please change the name of the page back to the correct Taittiriya. Taithreeya is simply not correct and does not accurately reflect the spelling in Sanskrit. There is no "h" in this word. The last "i" is long, and a long "i" is sometimes spelled "ee" in informal usage. It would be better to retain the more "academic" spelling with "i" here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.206.104.232 (talk) 17:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: changed name to Taittireeya since it is more close to real pronounciation.Lokesh 2000 08:29, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For future reference, please don't move things by cut and paste as it destroys the page history and detaches an article from its Talk page; please use the Move tab at the top of the page instead, and if that doesn't work follow the instructions on the Move page.FlagSteward (talk) 13:53, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change 

message: Added a Link to English Translation--Rsastry (talk) 11:25, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation
Talk:When an Old Cricketer Leaves the Crease

message: There's an error in this article.  The Geoff referred to is Geoff Boycott not Geoff Arnold as stated —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.152.243.201 (talk) 14:52, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Geoff Boycott or Geoff Arnold?