lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Guoxia

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20060513014135/http://www.equinekingdom.com/breeds/ponies/chinese_guoxia.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:56, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Dülmener

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20050301002756/http://equinekingdom.com/breeds/ponies/dulmen.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:14, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Widgetbox

message: March 25: Removing the "innapropriate tone" flag. Not participating in "SFBAProject" shouldn't flag this article as "innapropriate tone".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.43.49.130 (talk) 01:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A tag
Talk:Pfeifer Zeliska .600 Nitro Express revolver

message: I don't think two crappy youtube vids by the same user count as adequate references.  E. Sn0 =31337= talk 21:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi  E. Sn0 =31337= talk, no references verify the WP:GNG notability of this article so I am nominating it for deletion. AadaamS (talk) 07:06, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  youtube vids 

message: Should a picture of it be added? There's quite a few pictures of the gun on Google.
ParadigmTheory (talk) 00:19, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture?
Talk:Caldarchaeol

message: Our current pictures depicting the structure of caldarchaeol consists of big round rings. This image, although probably very low energy in less-crowded environments, cannot be representative of how it looks like when it gets those phosphate head groups and get stuffed with many of its siblings in a cell membrane surrounded by water. Indeed, figure 5 at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1366815/ looks pretty not-bent. Artoria2e5 🌉 08:05, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big round ring pictures
Template talk:Death of Jesus

message: Seems excessive to include one film, as controversial as it was. I would remove it. Comments? Alientraveller (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passion of the Christ 

message: I would remove the reference to the Talpiot Tomb, because it is a fringe theory, rejected by the overwhelming majority of scholars. No important scholar of the historical Jesus mentions it, either Christian (John P. Meier, James Dunn), jewish (Géza Vermes) and atheist (Maurice Casey, Bart D. Ehrman). The only important scholar supporting such theory is James Tabor, who is a known supporter of fringe theories, rejected by the scholar consensus.--Karma1998 (talk) 12:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Similarly, Roza Bal should be removed, because the links to Jesus are completely unfounded, and based on hoax-books. I think that while some the important fringe theories could be kept, the retention of the more obscure fringe theories in a prominent and widely used template is WP:UNDUE. The Discoverer (talk) 04:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

text: I am removing Talpiot Tomb and Roza Bal, because they are examples of lost body/stolen body and swoon hypotheses respectively. The Discoverer (talk) 06:08, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talpiot Tomb
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Hennessey, Patrick

message: User:Hennessey,_Patrick
    run at Fri Feb 1 05:45:10 2008 GMT
Category:              1
Image:                 2
Mainspace              237
Talk:                  6
Template:              1
User talk:             212
User:                  31
Wikipedia:             17
avg edits per page     1.21
earliest               09:37, 10 November 2006
number of unique pages 419
total                  507
2006/11  8
2006/12  0
2007/1   1
2007/2   0
2007/3   1
2007/4   0
2007/5   0
2007/6   0
2007/7   16
2007/8   0
2007/9   0
2007/10  1
2007/11  0
2007/12  0
2008/1   457
2008/2   23
(green denotes edits with an edit summary (even an automatic one), red denotes
edits without an edit summary)
       Mainspace
20 University Golf Club
4  Par (score)
3  Lawful orders
2  Jandala
2  Dorothy Hennessey
         Talk:
3 University Golf Club
               Image:
2 University Golf Club - Logo 001.gif
        User:
27 Hennessey, Patrick
3  Snuffereet
     User talk:
8 Hennessey, Patrick
4 213.162.200.18
3 124.217.95.210
3 Animals333
2 68.108.88.24
2 194.105.29.54
2 Macterminator138
2 118.91.176.18
2 216.100.95.90
                  Wikipedia:
11 Administrator intervention against vandalism
3  Requests for adminship/Hennessey, Patrick
If there were any problems, please email Interiot or post at User talk:Interiot
.
Based directly on these URLs: [1]
* The edit count was retrieved from this link at 05:45, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Hennessey, Patrick
Talk:Dosanko

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20041029224432/http://www.ansi.okstate.edu/breeds/horses/hokkaido/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:54, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work.  I restored the note that lists the other Japanese breeds, I don't think all of them have articles yet, for one thing, and there are too few to be worth a navbox IMHO.  I would be interested in your view of using the citation templates to do the cite formatting.  Your way works fine visually, but the templates are getting to be pretty standard these days.  Montanabw(talk) 21:25, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: > The people of Hokkaido may be nicknamed "Dosanko" after the horses.
They actually are... There is an anime airing from Jan 2024 titled "Dosanko Gal wa Namara Menkoi!" i.e. "Hokkaido Gals Are Super Adorable!" This article is likely to receive significantly more visits then. 188.143.7.133 (talk) 17:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not may but january.
Talk:Port of Eden

message: There is a substantial amount of background material on the Port of Eden, appropriately given its status as a declared port (albeit a minor one). In its current form this article contains little other than what appears at Eden, New South Wales, but I intend to add to it over the next few days. 
This message is in case this appears as a benign content fork.  Euryalus (talk) 21:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion
Talk:Murray Morgan Bridge

message: Why is this article written in the past tense? The bridge is closed but it still exists. Rootrider (talk) 13:04, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good question, i fixed it. Murderbike (talk) 01:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Tense? 

message: https://www.google.com/maps/@47.264941,-122.4117693,3a,75y,205.7h,89.01t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sfQ8DvEkxd-UPNNVMlk6cGg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656 --NE2 22:05, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The bridge was still closed in July 2014...
Talk:Polanco, Mexico City

message: What is pseudo-baroque quarry windows?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.103.205.250 (talk) 05:01, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pseudo-baroque quarry windows

message: can somebody ad a list of notable residents of this area because I know some presidents and other famous people have lived here so just asking?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guslb12 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  list of notable residents 
Category talk:Educational technology

message: This category needs cleaning. The biggest task is that most pages in the "Educational Technology" category should be moved to a subcategory. For example, educational technology companies should have the "Educational technology" category replaced with the "Educational technology companies" category. It seems as though the only pages that should remain in the master "Educational technology" category should relate to concepts and movements directly related to the category (e.g., M-Learning). Companies, software, and initiatives seem to be the main items needing categorization. Royce Kimmons (talk) 18:15, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
Category talk:Ecology terminology

message: Shouldn't this category be given some description as to what it's supposed to contain? Why, for example, is detritus here? Couldn't virtually anything that has a definition (i.e. anything in :Category:Ecology) be placed here? Shouldn't definition categories be reserved for articles that are actually about definitions, such as definition of a planet? If an article is only a definition, it shouldn't be here. Richard001 (talk) 07:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category description
Talk:Emmanuel College, Melbourne

message: The grammar and overall quality of writing should be improved, but it is an overall good article. Evrestsebretawhtoot (talk) 03:31, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Notre Dame Campus and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:58, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Notre Dame Campus" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Scottish crest badge

message: I added a list of crests and mottoes used in crest badges. But it might make the article too long. Should it be turned into a stand alone list, with a link to it on this page?--Celtus (talk) 06:34, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: moved it to List of crest badges used by Scottish clan members.--Celtus (talk) 08:07, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  List 

message: I'm not acquainted with . Is there a way, as with <ref>, to avoid multiple copies of the same footnote? —Tamfang (talk) 22:23, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  tell me again, tell me again, tell me again! 

message: a huge amounts of changes were added, images were added deleted etc...many of these changes were unreferenced and added information was not in references given. I took a bold step and rolled back to 7 june. My thinking is that the editors who made the changes: User:97.82.45.48 and User:Wyvren were using the changes to pursue an agenda expressed at Talk:Akins. Yours ever, Czar Brodie (talk) 10:54, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  took article back
Talk:SeaSeep

message: Some of the content to create this entry was taken from www.blackgoldenergy.com with the permission of Black Gold Energy LLC. Louisratusc (talk) 08:15, 1 February 2008 (UTC. this was done to get the page up and running.)
More content is being added to this page that is not from www.blackgoldenergy.com and other changes are being done as quickly as possible.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Louisratusc (talk • contribs) 10:07, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Use  at the top of the article to show you are working on it. SGGH speak! 10:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Division (business)

message: Is it true that a portion of a business has to go by a different name for it to be regarded as a division? The examples given (HP's division versus the Compaq subsidiary) seem to contradict that. JanCeuleers (talk) 08:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One can have a customer service division. A mainframe division, a research division, a sales division. All sorts of reasons for having divisions. And they need not have any special separate names. Dmcq (talk) 12:03, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

text: This article is just original research. Unless some sources can be found I think it should just be deleted. Dmcq (talk) 12:11, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Different name?

message: Currently, the example in the overview section says "OneWest Bank, although a separate legal entity, is classified as being a division of CIT Bank". However, the next section says "divisions... are businesses fully integrated within the main company, and not legally or otherwise distinct". Am I missing something, or are these two statements contradictory? --Privman (talk) 19:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal contradiction regarding division being a separate legal entity
Talk:Trikone

message: The Yahoo group http://groups.yahoo.com/group/trikone has been created by Trikone organization to facilitate some of the needs of the group. And this cannot be a Copyright violation issue. Uday Chandra Karrothi (talk) 21:23, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: An encyclopedia does not exist to promote an organization. It should simply provide objective information. Therefore, the text of the article must be mostly original. Dieresis (talk) 13:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Also, even if the text was not copyrighted, it would need to be explicitly licensed in a manner compatible with the GFDL. Most sites will not specify such licenses, so the only solution is to produce original text. Dieresis (talk) 13:33, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: Citations made of the Trikone web site must conform to the standards specified in WP:SELFPUB. I believe the citation deleted last night fit the requirements, so I restored it, while adding others. Dieresis (talk) 13:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it inline in the Notable Events section.--Dieresis (talk) 13:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

text: I added the link in External Links sections. I also added the Resources Section. Uday Chandra Karrothi (talk) 21:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: It is biased that Telugu is not included :-( he he he he..... Since majority ( kind of) is Telugu...Uday Chandra Karrothi (talk) 21:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just add it. --Dieresis (talk) 03:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

text: OK Fine!!!... I will add it..... later..... Uday Chandra Karrothi (talk) 21:22, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Languages

message: Who are Ashok and Arvind? Facts stated in the article should be relevant and cited. "Ashok" and "Arvind" are just two common names unless further information is provided. Dieresis (talk) 00:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a reference and corrected the facts according to the reference. Dieresis (talk) 14:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Ready

message: Pls rename this disambiguation page as Ready (disambiguation) Gauravjuvekar (talk) 14:25, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be appropriate only if there were a primary topic for the term Ready. Did you have a topic in mind that you think should be primary? Otherwise, moving the page to Ready (disambiguation) would be pointless, because Ready would redirect to it anyway.--ShelfSkewed Talk 16:05, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
Talk:Malva preissiana

message: Before I remove these couple of edits I’ll leave the text here. This is potentially interesting but without citation and with odd spelling. If you can make anything of it, please do! 
Lavatera plabeia is also found in Western Staraleah(Australeah) and was used ceremonialee as a representation ov what Europeans call the planet Venus. Primarilee this flower was the colour white. As the Emyu represented the galaxee, Flowers of different sorts, represented stars/planets in the Alian Aboriginal Staronomee.
Edit 1, Edit 2
 --☸ Moilleadóir ☎ 04:26, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human uses
Talk:Red Clay (disambiguation)

message: I third opinion was requested at WP:3O, an informal process to resolve disputes between two editors. Have reviewed MOS:DAB, in particular Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Examples of individual entries that should not be created and Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Lists. This disambig page is precisely the thing that is to be avoided, as none of the other entries are known only as "Red Clay", but by their full names. For the alternative suggestions: "Move to List of red clay articles" is just renaming a disambig page, while "Mark for cleanup" also does not accomplish anything. The option I recommend is that this page be nominated for deletion and be considered by a community debate, if needed. Thanks! (EhJJ)TALK 00:18, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Deletion is an option if given due process. However, at least one of the entries, Red Clay Consolidated School District, is explicitly indicated as being known as simply "Red Clay", while the others arguably do merit inclusion. Streams such as Red Clay Creek are regularly included on disambiguation pages. The others, while in a longer disambiguation page might be clearly unacceptable, on shorter disambiguation pages, similar entries are routinely included. older ≠ wiser 01:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: While deletion is not by default ideal, in my opinion, in the interest of resolution I have so nominated this article. ENeville (talk) 18:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Third opinion
Talk:Red Hat sect

message: I think the word 'hat' in this context is a very problematic term. Even though in popular culture, the term "Yellow Hat" or "Red Hat" is commonly used in China and other places, Tibetan Buddhist sects/schools are much more complicated than just Red Hat or Yellow Hat. Gelugpa often wears Yellow Hat, but it doesn't mean all Gelugpa monks wearing yellow hat to differentiate themselves from other sects.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hermitchoni (talk • contribs) 18:23, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Hat" 

message: I think 'schools' is the preferred name, e.g. all the individual school articles predominantly refer to schools. Possibly 'red hat sect' and 'yellow hat sect' are particular usages. However, if that can't be established, I think the article title should be 'Red Hat schools'. Aarghdvaark (talk) 02:07, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schools or sects
Talk:Reanimator (disambiguation)

message: Proposed move: Reanimator (disambiguation) to Reanimator. The term appears not to be used overwhelmingly in only one sense, so WP:DISAMBIG would seem to indicate that the disambiguation page should go on the unmodified title. Agree, disagree, or comment? - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 08:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Reality Check

message: This article refers to a technique used in lucid dreaming to determine whether one is actually dreaming. This technique is mentioned elsewhere on the Internet - see for example LucidWiki Reality Check. But the term "reality check" is not mentioned in the Wikipedia Lucid dreaming article.  RichardVeryard (talk) 19:48, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lucid dreaming]]
Talk:Panagbenga Festival

message: Feast of our lady of peñafrancia 119.94.177.238 (talk) 06:49, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  PHYSICAL EDUCATION 

message: Kaylan at saan ginaganap Ang panagbenga festival 119.95.103.1 (talk) 11:18, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: ? 119.95.103.1 (talk) 11:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mapeh
Talk:Grey-faced sengi

message: I wonder if this article should be titled Grey-faced Elephant Shrew rather than Grey-faced Sengi? MSW3 lists every other species in the order Macroscelidea as an "Elephant Shrew". Thoughts? Rgrds. --Tombstone (talk) 13:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sengi or Elephant Shrew 

message: I've just removed all the spurious uses of the  tag referring to e-mails. Personal communications are not reliable sources and constitute original research. Much of the content of this article may need to be removed because of this. —innotata (Talk • Contribs) 15:37, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  E-mails 

message: If this animal is actually only 5.6 cm / 2.2 in long and weighs in at 710 g / 25 oz, you sure would know it was a new species: given any normal mammalian body shape, it would have to be made of something a lot heavier than lead. (A cylinder of solid osmium, densest of the elements, the same length and of diameter 2.54 cm / 1.0 in, would weigh only 646 g / 23 oz.) The emphasis on the animal's weight in the Rathbun quote made me wonder if somebody's testing our numeracy here. David K (talk) 20:06, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked the source, and you're right; it's actually 56 cm. Ucucha 20:13, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax or mistake? 

message: The article is currently tagged for original research.  Can someone point out what is of concern as original research?  There are some citation needed tags.  Can the OR tag be removed? RJFJR (talk) 17:53, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research?