lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wheeze

message: This is just a minor complaint, but I think that the image should read, "During an Asthma Attack" rather than the current "After an asthma attack". Constriction occurs only during the attack; it is not permanent. --Vlmastra 22:19, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asthma Illustration 

message: A recording of this sound would definitely add to this article. Cburnett 15:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added --MarmotteiNoZ 05:28, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If people are will to help I can get more sounds similar to this one... Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:06, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Audio

message: What does this mean? Without explanation of what it is I don't think mentioning this "pediatric peanut" helps the article at all. Rainwarrior (talk) 00:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is merely a non-encyclopedic way of saying that stridors often occur when children eat peanuts. Aethalides (talk) 06:21, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fabled Pediatric Peanut 

message: Certain medication, such as some beta blockers can cause bronchospasms which cause wheezingBronchospasm Aethalides (talk) 06:21, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medication 
Talk:Hartford, Cheshire

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.) 
Peter I. Vardy 20:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: I added a section referencing a couple of local companies (major employees) and have had it reverted as spam.  A note on my talkpage does not really expand on the reason except saying it is advertising.  It is unclear why, but I am guessing it is because it contains citations which are links to external corporate web sites.  Does anyone have any advice about how I might reference major local employees without seeming to be spam?  I have posted this on the User_Talk:ScorpO page too. Pixie2000 00:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Right, I am going to answer my own question - I am pretty sure it was reverted due to over-zealous admins seeing links to external corporate websites.  As I guess I do not need to cite the claims made in the economics section I have put them back in without the citations, and therefore external links.  Hope everyone is happy!! Pixie2000 00:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Economics

message: In addition to the three boundary changes noted for Hartford civil parish (1894, 1936 and 1955), I seem to remember that there was an adjustment with Weaverham in the Beach Road area around 1988, which I can't source at present.  Can anyone else help?  Old Wittonian (talk) 09:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boundary Changes 

message: * John Hardman, author of The Life of Louis XVI
I am removing this name from the list as the wikilink connects to a businessman formerly Chairman of Asda, with no indication of origins in Hartford and not credited with any books written by him. It can be added if a genuine John Hardman matching the description is found who is demonstrably connected to Hartford.Cloptonson (talk) 15:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal from list of Notable people from Hartford
Talk:Jago of Britain

message: I've removed the following:
:Ironiacally, cousins of the present Jago, reputed to be part of a "mad, Catholic family" by Sophie Wood, Oxford 2007, now seek succour in the area.
It's not only the spelling error in the first wird but also the lack of clarity that makes this look out of place. If someone knows who this "present Jago" is meant to be or what the title of that ominous book might be, feel free to explain and re-insert. Cheers, Trigaranus 22:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Present Jago 

message: Alright, this sounds really cool. So there is a figure in regional folklore which is identified today as Jago. But it's very unlikely that a figure supposedly invented by Geoffrey has entered rural mythology. Could people who know about this modern Jago expand the article a little? There's a lot of questions one might ask, such as: since when has that figure been seen? is it a cognate of the White Ladies and other ancestral spirits of noble houses? has it always been identified with a "King Jago"? in what form does it's name appear in the rural legends? what theories are there for the origin of this figure?
It sounds as if it was a historistic kind of projection into the age of Reformation (what with "mad Catholic family" and all), but could be as late as from the Victorian age. What does Sophie Wood write in her book?
Trigaranus 08:41, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sightings of Jago
Talk:Round Tower Lodge

message: Northwich Police have tweeted an image of the tower after having been struck by a car this evening (2013-11-13).  It looks like the tower has been severely damaged.  I don't imagine that there is a reliable source for this yet, but it will almost certainly need to go in the article when such a source becomes available. Papa November (talk) 00:08, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Very sad to lose this listed building.  Done. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 11:04, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Would also be good to track down a freely-licensed photo of the demolition site (or the collision itself).  I'd take one myself, but I don't live in the area any more. Papa November (talk) 23:49, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vehicle collision
Talk:Cordelia of Britain

message: I propose removing the category "Queens regnant in the British Isles" because it implies that she existed when it's fairly certain she didn't.  Any objections? Deb (talk) 12:47, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. No objections. ðarkuncoll 12:49, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Queen Regnant?
Talk:SCUL

message: This wiki entry needs far more cowbell. 1999 is the latest landmark? Surely someone wants to devote a few hours of busy work this next season to accrue some rank. Gropo 22:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cowbell

message: Is this nonsense really relevant to a worldwide encylopaedia? Les woodland (talk) 08:56, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevance?

message: I have removed this article from membership of WikiProject Organized Crime because this article is about a "subversive" bicycle club, not a criminal organization. While, these clubs have sometimes been called bicycle gangs, they do not generally appear to be involved in crime, organised or otherwise. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 09:13, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed from WikiProject Organized Crime
Talk:Bladud

message: In the Hebrew Wikipedia wa are wondering how to transcribe this guy's name correctly.
Should we transcribe it from Welsh? Then, i guess, it is supposed to be something like /'blajðid/.
Or should we transcribe it from English? Then it is supposed to be something like /'bladad/.
A clarification would be very welcome.
Thanks in advance. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 23:19, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Two refs added, but my IPA transcriptions could bear an overview.--Old Moonraker (talk) 20:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Saying that there is "No historical evidence: is pure POV. Geoffrey may be replete with errors and fanciful embellishments, but he is no worse than AS Chron., which is also not contemporaneous. Characters in ASC including most of the Kings of Wessex would also need to be marked with "No historical evidence" if we go down this road.
I would suggest Bladud is marked as "the only historical evidence for B. is Geoffrey of Monmouth, who is not contemporaneous and may not have access to original sources."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.115.252.130 (talk) 10:29, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geoffrey of Monmouth
Talk:Yarralumla brickworks

message: It might be worth adding something about the actual bricks made at Yarralumla. Recycled "Canberra Reds" are highly sought after by landscapers and rare unused bricks fetch quite high prices. Advertising a house as "Canberra Red brick" is a major selling point in real estate. However I'm not sure how to cite this without making it look like an advertisement. Dbromage [Talk] 06:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bricks
Talk:Electoral district of Croydon (South Australia)

message: Considering one is current and two are former, wouldn't it be best to have SA hold Croydon, others to keep their disambigs, and have a Croydon (disambiguation) page? Timeshift (talk) 05:18, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The current electorate should take precedence. Digestible (talk) 07:58, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality/WIP-naming-guidelines

message: When there are multiple names or terms used for a sex act, position, or practice, we ought to enable all of the more common ones to work through redirect.  The primary article name could be one of them, or could be called by the "scientific" term most commonly used.  By scientific, I mean that which might be used in polite conversation, a technical or research article on the act, position or practice.  An example might be "cunnilingus" or "felatio".  There are some cases where the colloquial term is very commonly used, and the "scientific" term might be obscure, a neologism or not yet in use.  In this case, the most commonly used name might be good for the primary article, with redirect from the infrequently used term going to the primary article.   Examples that come to mind are "Rusty Trombone" (is there a scientific term?  "Manual genital anal-oral stimulation"? (no active scientific term, or very obscure)  Or "Handjob" used for "Manual Genital Stimulation". (scientific term infrequently used, colloquial term not considered to be vulgar.  Atom 22:17, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly disagree to deciding anything primarily by number of Google hits.  See WP:GOOGLE.  Also note that if you search for "Manual genital stimulation" properly, by enclosing it in quotes, Google only returns 564 hits. --Strait 23:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: When the name of a sex act, position or practice has no widely accepted name, or when the term is used for a variety of activities, then the most commonly used term that can be cited by a reference should be used. (I disagree --Strait 22:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No term to reference 

message: It appears that this proposal has not attracted broad-based support and is not likely to.  It should either progress or be marked as rejected.  --Kevin Murray 18:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failure to reach a consensus
Talk:Radcliffe Camera

message: The railings were re-erected (as seen in the top photo) while I was a student: I think 1988, maybe 1989. Anyone have enough time on their 
hands to scour episodes of Morse to check which? :-) 86.160.128.169 (talk) 22:18, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railings
Talk:Acton Bridge

message: #Stub needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Photos need to be added. checked 08/06/2020
#Infobox needs to be added (use infobox UK place - see Template:Infobox UK place/doc‎
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. (See WP:References, [[WP:V], and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 19:20, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 

message: See the History section. The wording makes me wonder whether the permission is Wikipedia-compatible. In particular, permission granted only to Wikipedia and/or only for non-commercial use isn't acceptable. 86.150.147.162 (talk) 02:19, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I came to the same question independently and have removed the content. Hopefully someone can take a look at this properly, see whether it's a good reference and write something encyclopedic in their own words. See also here. — Bilorv (talk) 12:08, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "This section is adapted (with permission)"?
Talk:Agden, Cheshire West and Chester

message: #Stub needs to be massively expanded.
#Photos need to be added.
#Infobox needs to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. (See WP:References, [[WP:V], and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 19:41, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report
Talk:Under Reprisal

message: We need a cover here peopleSummitt 22:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Primer Impacto

message: The article is correct. I have watched the program for over 10 years now. The facts as listed on the article are correct. Ronbo76 22:31, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And as for the Veronica del Castillo fact, I saw that program that day. It was a watershed event with the death of a noted personality. Just because Primer Impacto announces a departure doesn't mean an anchor cannot and will not come back. It happens all the time. Ronbo76 22:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I watch the show daily and. . .
Talk:The Grand Sophy

message: Hey, , can we clarify what the title section is saying? Was this an intentional Regency-era pun by Heyer? Valereee (talk) 10:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Correcting ping: . Valereee (talk) 10:06, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't know of any evidence one way or the other. However, "The Grand Sophy was a name used by some 18th century writers for the ruler of Persia, the way The Grand Turk was used for the Ottoman Sultan, so it made sense for the young officers to have used it as a nickname for Sophy." (Regency Manipulations: The Grand Sophy) IMHO it's very unlikely that Heyer, who knew the period so well, would have been unaware of that fact. Angusta (talk) 13:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

text: I agree that's it's quite likely, but it feels like we're drawing a conclusion rather than following the sources. I'd like to remove the section. Valereee (talk) 15:11, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

text: I don't see where "we're drawing a conclusion rather than following the sources." Everything in the Title section is simple, verified fact. No conclusion is drawn. But if you feel that the wording somehow draws a conclusion, then I suggest that you alter it to remove the conclusion, leaving the factual statements in place because (IMHO) it's useful to explain the title of a book where – as in this case – the reason for the title isn't made clear in the text. However, if you feel strongly about it, you're free to delete the section; it'd be silly to start an edit war by putting it back, so I won't do so. Angusta (talk) 17:52, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Ping:  – Angusta (talk) 18:03, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You're still not getting the point of reliable sources, . Somebody's speculation in an online discussion is little better than the piece of original research added to the article that is being objected to here. Only a direct quotation from Georgette Heyer herself would count - and since she wrote regularly to her publishers commenting on the novels she was writing at the time, it may be available in her correspondance. I agree with  that the section should be removed per Wikipedia guidelines until the point is reliably clarified. Sweetpool50 (talk) 18:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine. For the first sentence of the Title section I cited a reliable, published source that is directly related to the topic and directly supports the material being presented. (unquote WP:OR) Not "somebody's speculation in an online discussion." As I said to Valereee, the section is a simple statement of fact; it says nothing about Georgette Heyer's view of the matter. If you feel that you can somehow read something into that section that isn't actually there then you, like Valereee, are free to delete it. {shrug} Angusta (talk) 19:55, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  title
Talk:Bridgewater railway line

message: Most if not all railway lines in Adelaide have a route map embedded as a Template file into the infobox. This page, however, has it coded directly into the article. I don't think myself clever enough ATM to convert/recode the article map into the as yet uncreated Template: Bridgewater railway line... JabberJawJAPAN talk 13:22, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route map
Talk:Transliminality

message: I have been rather concerned about what some might consider a violation of NPOV - the edits that some one appears to have a penchant for making about Thalbourne being "fooled by Project Alpha". Aside from whether this violates NPOV (after all, one might be skeptical that Wikipedia really does endorse a "neutral point of view") it concerns me that who ever puts this edit in never seems to cite a source for it.What is more, even if Thalbourne having been "fooled by Project Alpha" is something that could be supported by good sources, it is poor structure to introduce this information at the start of the article  - it should occur at a late stage in the article (to keep structural coherence) and the relevance to the topic should be clarified.Otherwise, this article would risk being classified as an article with an off-source topic and appear listed in that category. I made these edits, but initially I forgot to log in Wikipedia,so I shall my username here. 
ACEOREVIVED (talk) 23:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerns about a conspiracy on this article

message: All the sources referenced in this article involve Thalbourne, they're all primary sources.This article desperately needs secondary sources to establish the notability of this article. In the case that no secondary sources are added, this article could be considered for deletion. Megaman en m (talk) 08:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No secondary sources, notability not established
Talk:Ernest S. Croot III

message: I named the page "Ernie Croot" rather than "Ernest S. Croot, III", because that is the name given on his self-authored Georgia Tech web page.  But he seems to publish his papers as "Ernest S. Croot, III", so perhaps that is a more appropriate title.  I will ask him, and see what he says.  -- Dominus 22:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked with Croot; he said "Ernie Croot is fine." -- Dominus 15:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page title 

message: There is not a single secondary source in this article.  Refer to WP:N  This should be put up for AfD.  96.241.24.246 (talk) 09:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: is a secondary source.  —Mark Dominus (talk) 14:44, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Vicks

message: :Vicks is also popular among ecstasy users, who generally rub the cream underneath the eyes.
If that is true, with what purpose? - Stormwatch 22:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The above mentioned statement was unverifiable. However, concentrating the vapors to heighten the effects of Ecstasy is well documented. This entry has been updated to reflect consistent findings of use patterns among Ecstasy users. --Herbox 03:46, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ecstasy users 

message: I have an old Vicks Vaporub "container" from way back; my grandfather bought it many years ago and it's still potent. It was bought sometime way before 1990 as it was still made by "Vick Chemical Company" instead of P&G.
It has no metric measurement of the product on the label, and the ingredients mention a "myristica oil" which I assume is Nutmeg oil. It is contained in a blue glass with the letters "VAPORUB 60" on the bottom. A two digit year, perhaps?
Anyway, I'll try to get a picture of it soon, as the Label is fading on me. 71.8.66.194 02:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a very old Vaporub jar in my medicine cabinet that says Vick Chemical Company "div of Richardson-Merrell Inc. New York NY 10017"...I know Richardson-Merrell moved to Connecticut in the 1970s,divided into Richardson-Vicks and Merrell Dow in 1982,and Richardson-Vicks was sold to P&G in 1985.12.144.5.2 (talk) 05:41, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Vicks container 

message: My Vicks VapoRub is made in India instead of Mexico. I wonder if the Mexican packaging is limited to States only? LittleWhisky 14:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Mom cured hers with it. Should be added. 74.129.68.132 (talk) 07:27, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made in India
Talk:Fax art

message: i think it is really good to have fax art but it only was used 100 days ago.
What does this mean? --Daniel C. Boyer (talk) 21:32, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

message: Needs to be expanded. Mejorasi723 (talk) 08:23, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion
Talk:Kaikolar

message: I have suggested this merger because the two articles are, as far as I can see, perfectly identical — even showing the little ? next to the name of a possible organisation listed at the bottom of the page.  I haven't a clue what the correct title is, but surely one or the other should be chosen.  I don't know anything about Tamil languages, but I would assume that a "r" and an "n" would have clearly distinguishable sounds, so I'd guess that only one would make sense.  At any rate, if color/colour could be resolved, this one shouldn't be impossible.  Nyttend 23:19, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Huey's Cooking Adventures

message: I was watching Huey's show today (its on right now, actually) and I noticed that it's no longer called Huey's Cooking Adventures but is now titled 'Huey's Kitchen', which is slightly more commercial and cliche. Let us now change the title, to the glorious HUEY'S KITCHEN!!!
Kausill (Talk) (Contribs) 08:28, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change
Talk:The Who/to do

message: * Fix the subsections, make a "history" section and add the first five sections there. 
* In the discography section, remove the covers of the albums and make a simple list or maybe a table, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lists of works). 
* All the quotes in the "quotes" sections needs a reference. 
* If a date doesn't include month and day, don't link anything, for example: "...Live at Leeds album, on which, recently, the entire 1970 concert is now..." 1970 shouldn't be linked. Egogola 18:04, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:William Alexander Parsons Martin

message: Good rewrite
Good work on improving the article, Brian0324. You might want to transfer the photo of Martin to Wikimedia Commons, so Chinese Wikipedians and other members of the community can enjoy the illustration.--Niohe 23:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just transferred the image myself.--Niohe 13:13, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Does every photo need to be transferred there? I have added many photos of Asian & Chinese missionaries but have never taken the extra step. I have tried to search the Chinese Wikipedia to find and link the matching articles to the English counterparts, when possible. Hopefully someday the PRC will unblock Wikipedia so that a fuller picture of Chinese history may be known online.Brian0324 16:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's best, so that they can be shared by all wikipedias, but a very strict 'no fair use' and 'free images only' is policy enforced, so not everything from en.wiki can go there. William Avery 21:28, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled