Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/RodentofDeath/Evidence

message: See, as possibly the most egregious example, , , and . John254 01:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: this is not original research or a NPOV violation. it is well cited. it is the opinion of many on the talk pages of the Angeles City and the Human Trafficking article. actually, the only two people that insist there is human trafficking in Angeles are susanbryce and edg. they come up with not one single case of human trafficking to support this.RodentofDeath (talk) 08:21, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:RodentofDeath|RodentofDeath]] has introduced serious [[WP:NPOV]] violations and original research into Wikipedia articles

message: it seems i have been accused of trying to discredit susan bryce. particularly, i am accused of attacking susan bryce in an article:
*RodentofDeath edited the article Human trafficking in Angeles City to carry information attempting to discredit Susanbryce: . RodentofDeath's lead then read:"Human trafficking in Angeles City, Philippines doesn't exist. An smear campaign run by Susan Bryce has been active for years spreading lies about this Philippine city.... and variations thereof.   These edits inserted original research, being RodentofDeath's personal comments in an attempt to disprove certain contentions.
again, we seem to not be assuming good faith but so be it. i stand by everything written here. none of it is original research. look at the citations. susan bryce has been named in reputable newspaper articles as running a smear campaign. the online petition the newspaper article directs you to was written several years ago. the problem of her vilifying a city is still going on. pointing this out is original research??!!!! 
human trafficking in angeles city does NOT exist. i am still waiting for anyone to show proof that it does. i can show that department of justice records say it doesnt exist.
susan does a good job of playing the victim. i understand everyone's need to think she needs protection. BUT WHAT ABOUT PROTECTION OF ANGELES CITY RESIDENTS? she is accusing 150,000 people of being prostitutes and many other vile things. the facts in this case speak for themselves. angeles isnt a slum. angeles hasnt had one case of human trafficking. there are no child sex slaves.
as i offered before, all i need (or anyone needs) is information on where this is supposed to be happening and i will be the first person to make sure justice is done. nobody except susan seems to know where these atrocities are happening and she wont share the info so it can be stopped. this is a witch hunt and nobody can find any witches.
i will leave the racist side of her comments for everyone else to decide. it seems that all the bad people are foreigners from predominantly caucasian countries. interestingly enough most tourists are actually other filipinos or other asians. all businesses in the philippines must be majority owned by filipinos by law. yet she insists that bars are 80% owned by australians and, strangely enough, "all the bars around here" are owned by an irish man.
it really would help the situation if the people here would take an objective look and add a little research into this situation. i realize that may be too much to ask though.RodentofDeath (talk) 03:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Discredit?