Talk:Chile–Peru football rivalry

message: In Chile this rivalry does not exist. In Peru only exists and is only due to the Pacific War, not sports.
:I am not in any position to comment on whether or not this rivalry exists, but in light of the above and other commentary, it may be a good idea to add something to the history section about the countries' long-standing rivalry in general, dating at least from the War of the Pacific. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 16:04, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rivalry? WTF? 

message: ~Blogs as references aren't necessarily the best and most essential tools to use. Blogs may also prove to be overtly biased so any other kind of official reference would be ideal.Selecciones de la Vida 05:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but the blog was a reference to an article made by a Spanish newspaper (Not a Chilean or Peruvian newspaper; hence neutral). But if you say so, then so be it. Which by the way, if anybody could then find some usable reference(s)? That would be greatly appreciated. I'll keep searching for some, but I can't make any promises.MarshalN20 01:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Blogs

message: ~The list is going to be extended in the near future to include all matches. The FIFA head to head chart is being used as a reference, and the games are being added in chronological order. Selecciones de la Vida 20:19, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Matches

message: Well, the article has been created and fulfills its purpose as a good reference to the Chile vs. Peru rivalry. Thanks to all who participated in this (Most notably Selecciones de la vida and myself), but if any more information can be found then it is most welcome for somebody to post it up in here. A list of what would be neat to include in the article are: Pictures (Preferably of a match between the two teams) and some more interesting information that could make for a new section within the article.MarshalN20 12:43, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Improvements? 

message: Why does this article go so much in detail about the bicycle kick?
If there’s another article entirely dedicated to that topic, why is it extensively being discussed here too?
The format of this article is also inconsistent. The Chilean claim has no international recognition sub-section while the Peruvian claim does.
I say we should do away with the copy & paste of both claims and add a brief mention of the “controversy” regarding the origin of the kick, in addition to including a link to the main article.
Likeminas (talk) 17:44, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good to me. Thanks for your contribution Likeminas.--[|!*//MarshalN20\\*!|] (talk) 05:18, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy and Paste of [[Bicycle kick]] article

message: a rivalry between two countries that have never made a major impact in international footbal, chile was the first country to win a red card (caseli) it was also the first time in which video footage was used to refute the claims of an injured chilean player. He was acting in maracana. Chilevic (talk) 03:35, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Both Chile and Peru have made several major impacts in the sport, both positive and negative.--MarshalN20 | Talk 00:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chile and Peru rivalry 

message: Im not convinced this is a true football rivalry, as I'm very sure this football rivalry only exists in Peruvian minds. However I suggest changing the title of this page to "Copa del Pacifico" which is the offical name of the chile-peru football contest.--Chelios123 (talk) 10:36, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Per the sources, the Copa del Pacífico is part of this rivalry but not all of it, and covers only 19 of the 74 games they've played.  Note that Spanish Wikipedia has two articles, :es:Rivalidad futbolística entre Chile y Perú and :es:Copa del Pacífico (Chile-Perú). --Arxiloxos (talk) 13:48, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the "Copa del Pacifico" is disputed whenever any side feels like disputing it. This article is about the rivalry in general.--MarshalN20 | Talk 00:28, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copa del pacifico 

message: In chile this rivalry doents exist, maybe in peru, but not in chile,Peru is not chile main rival in football  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.105.87.184 (talk) 00:14, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If this was only a Peruvian rivalry, there would not be so many reliable sources that state otherwise.--MarshalN20 | Talk 00:30, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only a peruvian rivalry 

message: the past edits were clearly not done in good faith so I reverted. nothing more to say.Chelios123 (talk) 11:37, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The current edit clearly were done in good faith to improve the article, it is your personal attacks that are becoming the problem here.  I would strongly advise Marshal to not reply to accusations of bad faith, as ill-tempered responses are rarely helpful and obsucre who is responsible for derailing discussion.  It is often better to simply ignore them.  Chelios the attempt to needle Marshal is nakedly obvious to everyone concerned and I would advise you to stop now.  You comment on content not editors or the next stage will be a report at WP:ANI. WCMemail 11:57, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

text: just a side note, im sure the events of the past few days will be relevant to the future as per evidence. I tried to be nice and civil but that didn't work. Good luck your editing. no hard feelings, i hope. Chelios123 (talk) 13:00, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current Edits 

message: I am requesting a third opinion on this translation matter. Should the translation of the newspaper headline "Chile salio DERROTADO en un match que nunca debio perder" be translated based on the accurate translation or on the personal interpretation of an editor?--MarshalN20 ✉🕊 23:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the diff on the contested text: .--MarshalN20 ✉🕊 23:16, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with a third opinion. However, I, 100% dispute your wording, as yours is not an accurate translation.; it's only a word by word translation that completely changes the meaning of the sentence. SFBB (talk) 00:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, , for the third opinion.--MarshalN20 ✉🕊 16:31, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , my pleasure, happy to contribute and help out! Right cite (talk) 16:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third Opinion