lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hyporhamphus ihi

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 00:12, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Die Burger

message: I started to un-stub the article by revising it along the lines of the much longer Afrikaans-language version. It will be slow going, though... Smg9y 00:25, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revisions 

message: sorry, but I think readers are confused with the circulation here. I replaced the readers of 2006 with the _official_ circulation of 2005, since this is a more reliable source (from http://www.ads24.co.za/DailyNewspapers/DieBurger/tabid/1243/Default.aspx) --84.177.44.67 02:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Readers 
Talk:Eastern nannygai

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --– Sadalmelik ☎ 18:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:American System (economic plan)

message: My casual impression is that the man sitting cranking the music box is John Quincy Adams and the man walking in from the left is John C. Calhoun, with Henry Clay standing on the right of course.  Some expert please look into this and improve the caption if I am correct.  Thanks.
CountMacula (talk) 08:15, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Commentators" in the cartoon 

message: I may be mistaken in my earlier belief that Calhoun opposed tariff.
CountMacula (talk) 08:29, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Whoops maybe

message: In what sense? This is misleading because the founder of the Federalists, Hamilton, created the ideas behind the system in the Report on Manufactures.  It ran counter to the arguments of states' rights (especially, due to its effects, of Southern states) not federalism per se. 
Jrmcbd (talk) 22:09, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ran counter to federalism" 

message: helped make U.S. economically self­ sufficient by establishing a protective tariff, a national bank, and improving transportation systems 2601:704:47E:9330:3B2A:9398:CA72:821D (talk) 23:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the American System?
Talk:Rozanne L. Ridgway

message: Man, this thing reads more like a CV than a wiki article. GoldenRing 07:27, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That means it was written by the person its describing. What is a CV? —Preceding unsigned comment added by  TheWorldWideWeb (talk • contribs) 20:46, November 5, 2006
I have removed the autobiography tag; I see absolutely no indication that this was written by the subject, and no indication that this was meant to be a CV (all of the information in this article is contained in the links I added). --- Deville (Talk) 22:19, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiography?
Talk:Greg Eastwood

message: This page has apparently become the target of a vandal who insists on telling you what this Super League player is doing in his picture, as we all know a bit of a departure for sportspersons here at wikipedia. MarkFD (talk) 16:57, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Well many sources have claimed that Greg will be playing for Canterbury-Bankstown in the 2011 season  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.102.11 (talk) 13:53, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greg's 2011 Season 

message: Rather than constantly undoing edits, can we have some sort of constructive discussion about the merits of having (or not having) a caption on the photograph? Clearly MarkFD disagrees with the caption being there, whereas Jeff79 believes it should be there. Can we please call a halt to the edits until the matter has been resolved by discussion? Julianhall (talk) 18:55, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yeah, and the "vandal" comment is a bit uncalled for and frankly seems entirely inaccurate looking at the contributions that Jeff79 has made. Julianhall (talk) 18:59, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, don't worry Julian, this user and I go way back.--Jeff79 (talk) 00:15, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo Caption 

message: Hey Eastwood wont be moving to UK anymore regardless of his outcome for his Visa appeal  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.18.126 (talk) 08:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  His deal with Leeds
Talk:Stanley Gene

message: The links given for this age controversy have nothing to do with Stanley.  If somebody does not do something serious to find links to back up any of the silly claims, I think I'll re-do this page to make it more like every other Super League player. Rugbyhelp (talk) 05:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Age
Talk:Silver spinyfin

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 06:29, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
File talk:Windows 3.0 workspace.png

message: The two versions that have been juggled here back and forth are because of a problem: the earlier version contains colours from the 4-level, 64-colour EGA set, in addition to those of the ordinary Windows VGA set (Windows VGA: values 0 or 80 or C0 or FF for each sample; EGA: values 0 or 55 or AA or FF for each sample). Does anyone know more about this? --Shlomi Tal ☜ 07:37, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image colours
Talk:Splendid alfonsino

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 21:15, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:1919 General Steel Strike

message: While this article is very educational, it seems to have a very strong Pro-Labour bias.  I feel that this should be addressed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.123.208.30 (talk) 16:59, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Pro-Labour Bias

message: In the following section, the year is unspecified for several events occurring in October and November, and it is difficult to tell whether these events actually occurred in 1919 or 1920.  
As October and November wore on, many AA members crossed the picket lines to return to work. AA affiliates collapsed because of the member infighting this caused. Unions on the National Committee, squabbling over jurisdiction in the steel mills, publicly accused one another of failing to support the strike.[12]
The Great Steel Strike of 1919 collapsed on January 8, 1920. The Chicago mills gave in at the end of October. By the end of November, workers were back at their jobs in Gary, Johnstown, Youngstown and Wheeling. The AA, ravaged by the strike and watching its locals collapse, argued with the National Committee for a unilateral return to work. But the National Committee voted to keep the strike going against the union's wishes.
Firstly, it is stated that "The Great Steel Strike of 1919 collapsed on January 8, 1920."  Then, "The Chicago mills gave in at the end of October. By the end of November, workers were back at their jobs in Gary, Johnstown, Youngstown and Wheeling."  Does this mean that the Chicago mills gave in at the end of the previous October, or the following?  The first paragraph states that strikers crossed the picket lines early.  The second paragraph states that, against the AA's wishes, the National Committee voted to prolong the strike, presumably into 1920.
I do not believe that I personally have the resources to straighten this out, but these sentences are written ambiguously enough to leave me wondering what the actual timeline of this strike's collapse actually is. Mousebelt (talk) 19:30, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1919 or 1920?
Talk:Michael Ennis

message: Lemon Pickets (talk) 03:18, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now game listed as 'Mick' Ennis 24/06/09. 
Talk:Cowles Mountain

message: I replaced the pronunciation. According to Mission Trails Regional Park historians the name is pronounced 'kohls' or like "coals". Rsduhamel 08:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As I recall, there was talk about repainting the "S" in the late 1980s but there was such an uproar from environmentalists that it was never actually done. Rsduhamel 03:12, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The "S" in the late 1980s

message: This may be a nitpick and I am not sure of the policy, but in 1931 SAN Diego State University did not exist; it was San Diego Teachers College or something like that. Wschart (talk) 19:57, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  SDSU
Talk:Lyon Gardiner Tyler

message: List of presidents of the College of William and Mary asserts that Tyler was the founder of the William & Mary Quarterly. The dates are right (the journal began in 1892), but is this entirely accurate? Can someone source this? — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 14:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded William & Mary Quarterly? 

message: Why is there nothing about what he wrote? Oh wait.. We don't want any of his work on here since it may have a pro southern bias. We only want a pro northern bias on here.Serialjoepsycho (talk) 05:42, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Historian 
Talk:Experiments in Art and Technology

message: move to "Art and technology" to meet style reqirements, please. 71.132.131.237 07:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Move completed, per request. -GTBacchus(talk) 19:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I've reverted this unexplained removal of references.104.163.158.37 (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 

message: the use of WAS up top implies it is no longer running, but there's no mention of its demise.  is it still going?  Cramyourspam (talk) 22:24, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  still around? 

message: I began expanding the topics covered in this article based on recent publications. More work is required on other topics such as 9 Evenings, Automation House, the Anand Project, and other public projects. I will come back in the coming months to add what I can, but if others have access to relevant publications, please continue the expansion.Video Researcher Nina (talk) 20:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion
Talk:Qadian

message: In the list of education providers
*S.S.Bajwa Memorial Senior Secondary School
*Vibudhah College of Health Sciences
*Taleem  Islam Senior Secondary School
*Jamia Ahmadiyya Qadian
*Nusrat Girls High School
*Nusrat Girls College
*Ahmadiyya Centre for Computer Education
* A.V.M. High School
*Daya Nanad Anglo Vedic School
*Khalsa Senior Secondary School
*New generation computer centre main bazar qadian
* Garden Valley
*Sikh National College
The underlined abbreviations should be expanded, unless they are abbreviations in the official name itself. 
"New generation computer centre main bazar qadian" looks like a name or a description, plus a location. If it really is a name the words should be capitalized; and unless "Main Bazar Qadian" is really part of the name of the institution, it should be deleted. 
Thnidu (talk) 02:47, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education
Talk:The War Report

message: Did Havoc produce anything for this CD? A few people on Amazon are saying he did but he isn't listed here.
This whole article is ridiculous.  By the time this album came out, it had been YEARS since groups like Mobb Deep and Wu-Tang 'breathed new life into the gangster rap genre'  and through their productions defined the paired down, haunting, east coast 90s gangster sound.  This sound did NOT originate on this album, and I'm really tired of people acting like this album changed the art form somehow.  We all know it didn't, and if you listen to any East coast rap that came out before this, you'd know.  And what about NaS?  Say what you want about him, his early albums were ALL ABOUT GANGSTER SHIT.  You can't change the fact that he rapped about it.  It's history.  Notorious B.I.G. anybody?!  C'mon man.  Raekwon?  Ghostface?  Shit, even Gza.  This whole album sounds like Havoc and Rza's style of production.  Shit, anybody in Boot Camp Clik man.
I'm not saying this isn't good music.  All I'm saying is, this shit didn't CHANGE THE STYLE OF THE TIME!   It's an EXAMPLE of the style of the times.  There is really nothing new on this album, even tho it's a very well done album.  
People need to stop ignoring history. This came out in 1997... c'mon man!
Anybody who disagrees with me and wants to continue to perpetuate the myth that this album somehow changed the game and originated some kind of trend that other people THEN followed, like this all started in 97 or some backwards shit, go ahead and find some damn sources to back it up.  
Cuz right now, EVERYTHING this article outlandishly claims is un-sourced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.46.218 (talk) 22:31, March 25, 2009‎
:Well said, and agreed. I'd probably also add some of the earlier stuff from Gang Starr as well.. Hard to Earn for example. -- œ™ 05:29, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this is most likely a consedence but their album is 'the war report' they have a song called iraq, they make various islamic references, and their album cover has two towers with a plane flying on the far right.. hmm.. Hazben 01:44, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out the original album cover for The Coup's Party Music .. ;) -- œ™ 05:31, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  9/11 reference?
Talk:Nick Kenny (rugby league)

message: Any movement made on the return of the page to its original location?Londo06 16:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would there be? There are two Nick Kennys, one is not clearly more notable/important than the other. All is as it should be.--Jeff79 (talk) 02:45, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One having lack of notability and one being a squad player at the Broncos. Do we have to wait until he starts dominating games and getting SOO matches under his belt before the article is returned?Londo06 09:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think you can convince Wikipedia that the footy player is the primary topic, by all means go ahead. But if I couldn't convince them that the Rugby League State of Origin was the primary topic for State of Origin I'm guessing it's not gonna happen.--Jeff79 (talk) 09:43, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I've often wondered what was up with the State of Origin page. Perhaps a concerted effort from the rugby league community to bring order to the, well not quite chaos, but some sense of normality.Londo06 09:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Universidad de Manila

message: Since this university is Universidad de Manila in Spanish and possible Portuguess, this is going to create a lot of mixups in the translations.  *groan*  <:( --Jondel 08:11, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it University in Manila or Unversity of Manila? What does "de" mean?--Howard the Duck 09:20, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Lol. How can you distinguish them? Although I think PLM translates as "University of the City of Manila", so that's off the hook. --Howard the Duck 15:36, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[University of Manila]] in Spanish

message: What do they call UDM's sports teams? --Howard the Duck 13:26, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sports team? 

message: is it just me or did mayor alfredo lim renamed UDM back to city college of manila after Mayor Atienza's Term?
PBCNX 15:09, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright friends, so what's the consensus here? Should it be Gat Andrés Bonifacio University, Universidad de Manila or City College of Manila? If as stated by Richard Relucio the school was not authorized to confer graduate degrees, then perhaps City College of Manila would be the proper name. If there are no objections within the next seven days, I shall proceed to move the article. Aclarado (talk) 07:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renamed back to city college of manila again? 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:49, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
ask ko lng kelan ulit exam tnx
TUITION: 1000  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.200.150.79 (talk) 07:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Podgorica Assembly

message: The mention of a Greater Serbia is completly irrelevant to the Assembly - and incorrect - so is the POV-ised portraying of the Serbian government. Thus, I am placing a totallydisputed tag.
Moreover, the ridiculous mention of a Montenegrin Autocephalous Orthodox Church (cca 1920s) is unconnected - and it implies that it originates from the 650s... Very interesting for Slavic pagans... The Autocephalous branch of the Eastern Orthodox Church in Montenegro was founded in the late 18th century, recognized (partially!) and formed throughout the 19th century as well as constitutionalized at the beginning of the 20th century. However, it was reunited with other Serb branches of the Eastern Orthodox Church in 1920 - just as it was its sole goal... Anyway, this is totally irrelevant with the actual assembly. --HolyRomanEmperor 08:17, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it's better not to mention it at all, rather then simply mention it wrongly, or aginst Wikipedia's policies. :) ANyway, I think that you can handle this article (can you, or should I take care of it myself?), however you must understand the expression of my face when I saw the year of 650. :0) --HolyRomanEmperor 15:42, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm no expert in Montenegrin church, nor am I proffesional historian, but I think I can manage to at least cut out biased and inaccurate parts of the article, and leave a short, but acceptable one. Will get to it as soon as I find time... Nije bitno... 15:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, I'm some sort of a historian - and I'm most definately certain that the Montenegrin Orthodox Church (the non-canonic one) was formed in 1997 and still maintains its quasi-existence today. The autocephalous Montenegrin branch of Eastern Orthodoxy, however, partially existed ever since its formalization in 1894, up to its inclusion into the Serbian Orthodox Church in 1920. I'll leave you to handle the article. --HolyRomanEmperor 10:05, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]