lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Book reference url

message: This is a good start! I've had in mind a scheme to make Bib:xyz entries recorded in a separate table in the database, so the bibliography could be searchable and shareable a la images, but that's a lot of hacking... a set of templates like this is a good bridge. Stan 20:53, 16 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Other initial feedback

message: Please keep this in sync with Template:Book reference link, Template:Chapter reference Template:Chapter reference link. (Probably we should use some sub-templates to automatically keep some parts in sync. Benwing 07:57, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep in Sync 

message: I'd like to extract some parts of these as subparts.  For example, if we ever were to change the Year, as I tried before, I'd want the change automatically propagated to the other similar templates.  Similarly for the "publisher ID", which could be a subpart.  This is even more important in the new things I created: Chapter Reference, Book Reference Link, and Chapter Reference Link. There is a large amount of code duplicated among these three, and I really want to subpart it.
Is there a standard for creating subtemplates (i.e. subparts)?  Do we just go ahead and create a Template and use it, and pick some reasonable name?  At the very least we need to pick a standard for naming subpart templates.
Benwing 08:39, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  extraction out into subparts 

message: This template has been made obsolete by the new  template.  (SEWilco 21:14, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete
Talk:List of lakes of Sweden

message: According to Statistisk Årsbok 2012 by Statistiska Centralbyrån and to Sveriges sjöar by Sveriges Meteorologiska och Hydrologiska Institut (who uses figures of Sveriges Nationalatlas -The National Atlas of Sweden - gathered from Lantmäteriet - the National Survey), i.e. what must be considered the most official figures, the ten largest lakes in Sweden are (in km2):
Vänern 5519
Vättern 1886
Mälaren 1090
Hjälmaren 477
Storsjön 456
Torneträsk 330
Siljan 292
Hornavan 262
Akkajaure 260
Uddjaure 249
Bolmen is 12th on this list (after Storavan 184) with 173.
--Episcophagus (talk) 18:00, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area
Talk:Kunjali Marakkar

message: Was the family of Kunhali Marikkars engaged in the defense of Calicut, or were they trying to protect the Arab monopoly over the pepper trade? For, once the ocean route to Europe opens, the Arab monopoly through the gulf region that extended to the Mediterranean Sea would vanish. Arabs were quite entrenched in Calicut with some village given to them to have wives and families on the Malabar coast. The profit in pepper trade has been mentioned as 3000 percent. 
--Ved from Victoria Institutions (talk) 07:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  A query 

message: This may have been a sword captured by Kunjali, but has it been proven that he had used it in combat? It looks very European in structure used for stabbing and the Mappila swords were broad, used for hacking.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.66.180.13 (talk) 20:52, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sword of Kunjali 
Talk:Kurt & Courtney

message: Should we include a section describing some of the errors included in the documentary that could not be cleared up before the release of the documentary. Ex- The test "proving" that someone could shoot themselvess while high on heroin was actually debunked prior to the release of the film but it was too late for Broomfield to correct it. The doctor involved verified that the experiment was flawed. So, should we include this info?BoyintheMachine (talk) 05:46, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible New Section 

message: I didn't think the film made it look like Courtney Love could of had him killed. 
It's part of the film but even  Nick stops believing it at one point.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.251.19 (talk) 21:39, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Be careful here. The information about Ms Love surely falls under the rules of Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 02:56, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conclusive evidence? 

message: You mention the "mixed reviews", yet include nothing on the film's reception. In that same vein, the persons impacted by and featured in the film surely had statements to make - condemnation, sorry they participated, comments out of context, or stand by their statements? Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 03:01, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception?
Talk:Extreme snowboarding

message: We should be able to find a better picture of extreme snowboarding.  I think this is just Granite Chief Peak, a short hike from the top of the lift.  I think extreme skiing/boarding usually includes mandatory air (cliff bands, chutes, and the like).  Granite Chief Peak is kind of steep, but nothing that any expert level freerider wouldn't go down.  Kjl 18:43, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

message: extreme places and locations - should be a section. eastern europe and central asia for instance. friend of mine intending to film thereGrroin 09:40, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  unusual locations
Talk:Curse of Ham

message: Too many pov edits to the line to trust it. Doug Weller talk 07:04, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I also note that Whitford p 20 says :... one striking example , the belief that blackness as well as servitude were the result of Noah's curse upon his son Ham ( or Cham ) is shared by Christian , Jewish , and Muslim commentaries from the forth to the twelfth centuries .: Doug Weller talk 07:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hope you're doing well, Doug.  I changed the  tag to the inline version targeting the specific content you were noting here, which I believe, based on your notes here, was the intention?  If not, and/or if I have your intention wrong, feel free to revert or change it back. ButlerBlog (talk) 13:54, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @ButlerblogThanks. I've taken this off my watchlist, trimming it down as much as I can. My research on archaeology and racism grows and grows, I'm finding more and more relevant topics and a lot of sources - reading them is really time consuming, turning them into article sections more so! And categorising existing articles, some of which don't even mention the blatant racism involved in the subject. Doug Weller talk 14:01, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Those rabbit trails can be enlightening and interesting.  It's one of the things that I love about wikipedia - I end up going down those paths and learning a lot!  Knowing this is off your watchlist, I may ping you for input if the situation warrants (assuming that's alright with you - I know you've got more important things going on). ButlerBlog (talk) 14:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Butlerblog Yes, "rabbit trails" is a great description. Love them. I had no idea when I started my draft I'd find so much. Makes it a really major project. I need to decide when to go live, but my lead is hopeless at the moment. Do ping me if needed. Doug Weller talk 14:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs fixing "Nevertheless, most Christians and Jews now disagree with such interpretations, because in the biblical text, Ham himself is not cursed, and race or skin color is never mentioned." 

message: according to book 3 of the book Enoch, Noah was the first child born with a different nature with skin whiter than snow and redder than a bloom of rose, and hairs on his head whiter than white wool and his eyes were like rays of the sun. 105.113.70.232 (talk) 06:42, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: In other words, Noah was the first child born differently from the suppose nature of man.   Skin colour, hairs and eyes. 105.113.70.232 (talk) 06:46, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book of Enoch
Talk:Truck wages

message: How does one propse that this page be merged with scrip? Jimworm 01:28, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They are realted but separate things, so I would be opposed to any merger.Grant65 (Talk) 13:00, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Scrip

message: By definition, unfree labor is labor under forced coercion. "exploative labor" is not the same as "unfree labor". In socialist theories, all labor in capitalist society is exploative to a degree. I am moving to replace this category as unsupported by the text of the article. `'mikka 00:22, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unfree labor 

message: there are some materials in william warrender mackenzie's report. Miriam Wright said it persisted into the mid of 20th ceturay. Jackzhp 16:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: truck system in newfoundland

message: What is the main difference between truck system and company store? Madd the sane (talk) 06:21, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company store vs. Truck system 

message: I hope this is more straightforward than what it replaces; it still needs a lot of work. The previous stub seemed too abstractly ideological (my POV, anyway) and unusefully unfocused. Also, the lyrics to "16 tons" don't belong here. Added the Law and Economics banners on the talk page (seemed appropriate). Provided some usable (and accessible) references, for a potential starting point. Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 20:54, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps a slightly better article stub 

message: Folks, A company store is also a defining structure in a coal camp and basically help the camp become a town. It is a fact that yes, the employee did not have another place to spend their earnings.  However, in the case of Appalachian Company towns and Coal towns, THERE WERE NO OTHER PLACES FOR AT LEAST A DECADE. We MUST avoid POV and politics if wewant to have an encyclopedia. Cant we define something before we imbue it meanings that may or may NOT be valid?????Coal town guy (talk) 02:10, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company Store NOT a truck System 

message: I am deleting A Tom and Jerry shop is a low-drinking room  from the end of the Brewer quotation in the Britain section:  There does not seem to be any (evidence of a) connection between the truck system and tommy shops on the one hand and Tom and Jerry shops on the other.
Frans Fowler (talk) 20:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom and Jerry shop in the ''Britain'' section
Talk:Romford (UK Parliament constituency)

message: I am not sure this should be down as a Labour gain in 1955, nor that the figures for change should be based on the 1951 result. As noted at the top of the article the 1955 seat used different boundaries to those used in 1950 and 1951, excluding the Urban District of Brentwood (which probably would have had a fair chunk of Conservative support in it). It can also be seen that the number of electors dropped significantly. Equally in 1974, the seat was different from that fought in 1970. The Times Guide to the House of Commons for the first 1974 election records major boundary changes and does not class it as a Conservative gain, so I do not think it should be classed as one, and the change figures should probably be removed. Dunarc (talk) 19:53, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  1955 and 1974
Talk:1963–64 NHL season

message: Either this article or the Baun article (ideally both) should be rephrased in such a way to indicate that the extent of Baun's injury (that it was a broken ankle) was not made known to the public (nor apparently known by anyone, including Baun) until after the playoffs were concluded.  Having just seen the original CBC broadcast tonight on APTN of game 6, I can say that Baun was taken off the ice on a stretcher with nobody really knowing the extent of the injury (see my comment on the Baun talkpage), with the announcers astonished to see Baun back on the ice later in the period (when he's taken off they assert with confidence that his game is done).  In the post-game interview with Baun, the injury takes precedence over the goal, with Baun suspecting that he has a pinched nerve, and seeming pretty confident that the injury is minor.  While there may have been rumours to the contrary, nobody knew Baun's ankle was broken until after the series was over - probably my favourite detail of the whole incident.  While the current phrasing may be technically correct, it fails to deliver the most amazing part of the story: Baun's desire to win trumped the excruitating (sp?) pain in his leg such that it never occurred to him that his leg was even broken.  Wencer 06:22, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bobby Baun
Talk:1965–66 NHL season

message: I've cleaned it up a good bit, eliminating a bunch of irrelevancies and numerous word-for-word copyvios from Trail of the Stanley Cup.  Ravenswing 04:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  One hell of a mess, but. 

message: I'm too new to Wikipedia to want to edit the page, but I'd like to point out that the following paragraph contains an error:
"Two new trophies was introduced for this season. Jack Adams won the first Lester Patrick Trophy for his contribution to hockey in the United States. This was also the first season the Conn Smythe Trophy was awarded for the most valuable player in the Stanley Cup playoffs."
The Conn Smythe Trophy was introduced for the 1964-65 season, as evidenced by http://www.nhl.com/trophies/smythe.html. This is also mentioned on the Wikipedia page for the 1965-65 season.
164.10.46.61 11:57, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conn Smythe Trophy
Talk:1966–67 NHL season

message: If the recent additions to this article sound like the season recap out of a book, they do.  Each and every one of them (a few word-for-word) come from the 67 season recap from Trail Of The Stanley Cup, even down to the season-ending injury to Matt Ravlich, a journeyman defenseman who logged only 400 games over ten seasons and whose travails wouldn't normally be remotely notable.  Certain events such as Bobby Orr's debut, Hull setting the goal record, Toronto's last Cup and Chicago's first first-place finish are worthy of inclusion if shorn of sportswriterese.  Ravenswing 06:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent additions 

message: I removed calling Orr arguably the greatest because its very subjective. While I know this is a weak argument, remember that not everyone considers him the best. Personally, I think there are others who are also deserving of the title as well, but that doesn't matter. Look at some of the others to compete for the title. Eddie Shore had everything in his body broken several times, yet still managed to help the Bruins to their last Cup until Orr arrived. Doug Harvey allowed for the Canadiens to never worry about defence. Orr was fortunate to play in an era of hyper-expansion. The talent was diluted considerably. Also he never played a full season. Thats why I removed that phrase. Kaiser matias 07:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's been a lot of debate over Orr on Wikipedia, but I was comfortable with the phrase myself; it is plain that the merits of Shore/Harvey/Bourque aside, the great preponderance of public and expert opinion is that he was the greatest defenseman of all time.  Arguably he is; certainly many sources make exactly that argument.  Ravenswing 12:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I went and added the Orr part about him being "arguably" the best defenseman ever.  THN did a "Top 50 players ever" poll in 1996.  Orr was #2, behind Gretzky.  Only other defensemen in top 10 were Harvey at #6 and Shore at #10 (Bourque was #14).  Patken4 21:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orr: Arguably the Greatest Defenceman
Talk:1967–68 NHL season

message: Is this article ready now to remove the citations warning? Alaney2k 14:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, probably not.  Everything I added last night needs sourcing, which I'll provide, but until I do ...   Ravenswing  03:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added information on Feb 29, 2008 about the new playoff format and referenced my sources. I did, however, change the first 2 paragraphs a bit. If anyone wants to compare the changes, revisit the page about 4 edits back.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 154.20.20.172 (talk) 10:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: Hm.  The article doesn't exist, but I see that the editor's creating season transaction articles, so I'll hold off reverting for a couple of days.   Ravenswing      04:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1967–68 NHL transactions
Talk:1980–81 NHL season

message: Adding up the tie games in the league stats, one gets 327.
How is that possible? Wouldn't this number need to be evenly divisible by two? 198.161.2.241 (talk) 18:26, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, the problem was with the record of the St. Louis Blues. There was a typo that listed the Blues tied 14 games when in fact they tied 17 times. The problem has been fixed. Deadman137 (talk) 17:14, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ties 
Talk:1981–82 NHL season

message: I corrected the L.A. Kings' Goals Against from 396 to 369, which is the total that appears in the Kings article (and Hickok Sports.com as well), and which makes the League's GF vs GA balance.  For some reason (probably comment length) my signature was not expanded, so I thought I'd 'fess up here so you'd know who is to blame. WHPratt (talk) 15:59, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standings GA column has error 

message: I noticed that the Adams Division standings table was a template link, the other three were contructed on the page. Apparently the templates vary, so I've left the Campbell conference to more capable editors. Jakaloke (talk) 18:35, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standings continuity 
Talk:Screenwriting theories

message: Yes, I think the page should be merged with "Screenwriting," as it relates to screenwriting structure, which is an important thing to understand about the craft itself.  That said, the page should also be edited to note that Three Act Structure is the standard in Hollywood, not Four Act Structure, and that several alternatives to Syd Field's paradigm have developed over the last few years.  Perhaps I'll take a stab at editing it, my first attempt at editing a Wikipedia page.
- Addition to Discussion by another contributor
I would disagree with your statements. As I feel Theory, and Craft are two different things (althought connected). I strongly feel Theory is a personal preference, and by merging this Theory article into the Screenwriting article, it will make it seem as if there is only one correct way to structure your screenplay. Especially with the rise of unconventional structure within cinema in modern times, it seems rather unnessicary especially at this point
--- 
The discussion of theory is woefully deficient.  Even for the conventional dramatic structure, there is a lot more theoretical material to draw upon than syd field's paradigm. -- gronkoid:11/05/05
----
The only change I would propose is renaming it to Screenplay Structure, otherwise it's fine.
Well, I agree with the merger personally, especially since this piece is part of another two related articles, Screenplay and Screenwriting - both of which I think merit re-writing. I'll edit the Four Act Structure thing right now on all three, it really struck me as odd as well and was planning to do that, but if anyone can gather some paradigms other than Field's and add them to these articles I would really appreciate it - I'm aware of the fact that there are a few, but I'm not familiar with the theory / cannot think of a way to express them other than empirical examples... BunnyDee 23:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:East Fijian–Polynesian languages

message: This Article along with East Fijian languages, West Fijian languages and related dialects of the Fijian Language I think should be merged with the Article Fijian Languages as really they discuss variations of the same topic and these other Language articles on the Fijian language are just small stubs and perhaps the Fijian Language article should be changed to just Language in Fiji and cover all related languages in the Fiji Islands. feedback and thoughts on this matter. 
Vinaka Maikeli MB 21:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: discuss merge
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Mille passus

message: I removed  a big chunk of text that Rktect had copied from the request of arbitration page. 
Discussion about the arbitration should take on the arbitration page, and the Votes for deletion page should be about the voting. Please don't mix the discussions all around. 
The Vfd page should not become another discussion field for different issues.
-- (☺drini♫|☎) 20:03, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI about Discussion about the arbitration should take on the arbitration page, I think that even though it is known to happen, according to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration, This is not a page for discussion, and arbitrators may summarily remove discussion without comment. -- Egil 20:14, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Hellen

message: I'm not sure, but shouldn't it be matriarch instead of patriarch in the first line?
:No, Hellen (as opposed to Helen) is male. --Macrakis 21:24, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: "together with his sister's Pandora's and Thyia's sons"
This line is confusing. Does it refer to the sisters of Hellen? Xuthus? Also, the apostrophe in "sister's" is not necessary. It would read more cleanly if it said "together with the sons of his sisters Pandora and Thyia" (after indicating who's sisters they are). Hraesvelgr 01:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: confusing sentence

message: " In the play, Melanippe, the daughter of Aeolus (and thus the granddaughter of Hellen), becomes by Poseidon the mother of twins, Aeolus and Boeotus. "
Are there two people called Aeolus or did Melanipple give birth to her own mother? Also there is no mention of Boeotus in the family tree diagram below this section. Desdinova (talk) 16:00, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a number of figures called Aeolus in Greek mythology; these two are distinct, as indicated by the links to their respective pages. As to the family tree, there are numerous conflicting versions of the genealogies of these characters, something no such chart could capture entirely, but I think the current chart (largely based upon Apollodorus, and given by the two modern sources cited) is still helpful as a visual aid. – Michael Aurel (talk) 23:30, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Melanippe Wise and The Family Tree
Talk:Operational risk

message: Basel Committee is based on "Group of Ten" countries which includes Japan, US and Canada.  Europe adopted the Based codes, not the other way round.
Martin (Talk, Contribs) 13:53, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't. Basel II is much more around the financial safeguards, rather than the IT ones. Any data protection would need to be "robust". 87.194.61.149 16:57, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basel Committee 

message: Removed a lot of text about analyst criticisms of definition.  Happy to see these reinstated if a citation is provided. Martin (Talk, Contribs) 13:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms of definition 

message: "However, it is worth mentioning that the near collapse of the U.S. financial system in September 2008 is a clear indication that our ability to measure market and credit risk is far from perfect."  I have done some work in market risk, I believe this would be more accurate to say "our ability to understand and manage market & credit risk measures".  September 2008 was more about reglation and mis-management, not about measurement.  206.230.48.50 (talk) 12:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree there is more needed on this topic. I have created a reputational risk article - perhaps that is more fitting than this article for expansion? Anneaholaward (talk) 15:47, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ability to measure market risk or manage? 

message: Although few would argue that poor risk management helped cause the recent crisis, this is a page on operational risk, which as far as I know was not a major factor.
DominicConnor (talk) 15:26, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Background