lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tutelo

message: I found a written account of a mythologized oral history from the Iroquois about how the Tutelo joined the Iroquois Confederacy, which would finally settle the matter as to how the two groups of Saponi split. Basically, when the Iroquois invaded Virginia & chased the Saponi out, a small group refused to give up their lands no matter what and ended up trapped in a cave near a river in a long siege, which ended in their surrender. Common Iroquois practice during the Beaver Wars was to capture enemy warriors & force them to become a sort of vassal tribe to the Iroquois. I also wonder if this had something to do with why the Iroquois sold the Saponi lands to the English. The Iroquois-Tutelo maybe could have held it on their behalf, but the other Saponi who fled south wanted their land back & if they came to continue war against the Iroquois, then it would largely be the captures Saponi fighting their own people on behalf of the confederacy. Maybe they were inclined to whatever choice avoided such an issue in the first place & urged the Iroquois to sell their own lands & be done with it. Bobbotronica (talk) 00:43, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Tutelo who joined the Iroquois 

message: The sources on this article conflict.  The source "Indians of Louisiana" declares them supposedly "extinct" and the last reference is 1898.   Samuel Johns' letters referenced by the Frank Speck citation were written in 1930.  Cringan's The Journal of American Folklore published in 1902, is a source of Tutelo music, also written after this source.  Adoption is not extinction.   The issues around Tutelo land, namely Tutela Heights Road, continued to be litigated to present day.   If this group is extinct why are the Haudenosaunee continuing to steward this land? Federer20201 (talk) 04:14, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extinct 

message: There is apparently a Tutelo Nahyssan Tribal Nation which is based in Cutler, Ohio. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:45, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Was going to add them to List of unrecognized tribes in the United States, but saw they were already listed, so I added their location with a newspaper source. Yuchitown (talk) 00:58, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tutelo Nahyssan Tribal Nation
Talk:Chris Başak

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 01:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Mitchelville

message: General William Tecumseh Sherman repeatedly wrote his superiors in Washington asking for guidance regarding, and supplies for, the "contrabands".
 It was t. W. Sherman .. Who I believe was in charge of grond forces in battle of port royal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stampdxer (talk • contribs) 19:14, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different general Sherman 
Talk:Hardeeville, South Carolina

message: In an attempt to move this page up from "start class", the general "city layout" format that is prevalent with most major and mid-sized cities in America has been utilized.  The ordering of some sections has been changed to reflect the preferred order, and several sections have been broken further into subsections.  - 10/26/07  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.47.17.251 (talk) 03:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Template talk:Logical connectives

message: Would somebody object if I change the bottommost link to a newly created False (logic)? A "contradiction" (a statement which entails the false) has it light side counterpart – it is a theorem (a statement, entailed by the truth/tautology), but not a tautology (logic) itself. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:37, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This  is an outcome worse than either "Contradiction" or "False". Wikipedia may not hide the link to false under the display title "Contradiction". Incnis Mrsi (talk) 04:51, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm open minded to how to organize things. However, upon reflection, I think Contradiction is more appropriate. We just need to make sure there is some relevant content at linked articles. The falsum, or tee symbols stand for an arbitrary contradiction, or tautology as the case may be. It is a "nullary" logical connective. This is consistent with the behavior of truth functions and arities, etcetera. If there is to be an article about "false" is has to be about the concept of the truth value.Greg Bard (talk) 05:34, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sadly, I am not native in English math terminology, which apparently is quite confusing in this domain. Nobody around knows all definitions of "⊥", which logical systems use it as a basic symbol, and how definitions are related. The falsum… stand for an arbitrary contradiction… it is a "nullary" logical connective. If "⊥" is defined as a connective, then it is not "arbitrary". Enough said. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:57, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction vs "False"
Talk:X-Men (film series)

message: What does 1st, 2nd and past refers to in the timeline? We are talking about X-Men Origins Wolverine so what is the "2nd" of X-Men Origins Wolverine? Redjedi23 (talk) 09:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody knows? Redjedi23 (talk) 17:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Most likely, 1st refers to the first scenes that are set around the 1800s, while 2nd refers to the main setting of the film in the 1970s. —El Millo (talk) 19:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timeline 

message: This was a discussion at various times years ago when this franchise was still actively producing films, but now that it has ended and hindsight gives more clarification -- is this really the best title for the article currently? Wouldn't something along the lines of X-Men (20th Century Fox franchise) be a better title, given the fact that there is more within the franchise than just films? Secondly, the MCU is producing its own version of the X-Men. Thoughts?--DisneyMetalhead (talk) 14:19, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Better name is “X-Men (Fox Series)”; it changes one word “Film” to “Fox” and changes the meaning. Legion aired on Fx, the movies 20th Century Fox, and the Gifted on Fox produced by 20th Television. Doremon764 (talk) 06:01, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Absolutemont! Could you open an official move discussion? 77.92.145.214 (talk) 15:14, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have always thought  was an odd choice for disambiguation, considering Legion and The Gifted are part of the franchise, but X-Men (franchise) is far too ambiguous. I think X-Men (Fox franchise) is a fine name, but I am ambivalent — Fox officially calls the brand "X-Men Movies" (back then, they had a website and app), and the TV series are often overshadowed by the films in sources. InfiniteNexus (talk) 07:39, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: Deadpool and Wolverine exists now 216.73.73.66 (talk) 15:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That film is not part of this X-Men film series and is a part of the MCU. Shawn Levy has also said this isn't technically Deadpool 3. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deadpool and wolverine
Talk:Homer Flynn

message: If you take out the unsourced statements in this article (I can't bring myself to obnoxiously put in a ton of [citation needed]s), there is no reason for this article to even exist.  What can be sourced is also on The Residents (except for Flynn's birthdate).  In fact, I don't care how unreliable the source for the drugs and the bisexuality may be, I'd like to see it regardless, as I've never heard or read anything along those lines, ever. —Eclipsed Moon 03:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well, someone better start talking. 

message: Please, first of all, consider me the impartial medium here - I've simply come across this article whilst doing reverts throughout Wikipedia.
I have proposed deletion on behalf of another user who has expressed concerns which already appear to be addressed on this talk page. If you can come to an agreement amongst yourselves regarding the content of the article the template I have added may be removed (see WP:PROD for more detailed info). Please note, however, that the article needs sources before this article can be considered improved because it is obvious that the "facts" are disupted.
I'll keep an eye on what's going on and if you need help with anything please just ask and I can hopefully help - but see if you can at least agree on something please =) SMC89 14:28, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Talk:Hydroxymethylfurfural

message: Degradation section is missing reference...
J Food Sci. 2008 Nov;73(9):C625-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00946.x.
Degradation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in honey.
Fallico B, Arena E, Zappala M.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.177.1.217 (talk) 16:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How about some specific citations to go with that generalization? Preferably in a form of case by case (at least one for every "juices", "milk" and "honey") scientific study with statistically and scientifically relevant results. --92.36.204.94 (talk) 23:52, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replied at the relevant discussion at Talk:Honey, with a few refs. Zaereth (talk) 01:38, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identified in a wide variety of heat-processed foods 

message: I found some further information on SMF, additional to the "biomedical"-entry at  where SMF is already mentioned. I hope some of this can contribute to the article:
According to this paper "Acrylamide and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF): A review on metabolism, toxicity, occurrence in food and mitigation strategies" Capuano et Al. (Food Science and Technology; Elsevier; 2011) HMF might be reconsidered as potential health risk. In the liver HMF gets converted to 5-sulfoxymethylfurfural by a sulfotransferase. Which is more reactive because the sulfur is a good leaving group. It is confirmed as genotoxic. Also in humans the sulfotransferases are more widely distributed over several tissues in the body, unlike the rhodent sulfotransferase, thats what might make HMF more dangerous for humans.
An Nasr Atair (talk) 22:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Derivate of HMF: SMF is genotoxic
Talk:Dan Kroffat

message: Kroffat and Lafond aren't anywhere close to being similar? LOL. Because two Canadian wrestlers who were best known with the same name aren't similar. Yeah. RandySavageFTW (talk) 12:52, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I do see your point even if I don't agree with it, but I'd actually say that Lafond is probably better known as Phil Lafon due to his run in the WWF in the late 90s under that name. Stephen Day (talk) 07:11, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continued discussion of above (lmao at it being archived)
Talk:The Hills Have Eyes (2006 film series)

message: The Hills Run Red is not a sequel, it has nothing to do with the story and is a totally different project. Its not even part of the series, and is about a forest not a desert. None of the same people are making it also, it has nothing to do with the hills have eyes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Moairguard (talk • contribs) 18:01, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hills Run Red

message: It's not clear why this article shouldn't be subsumed by The Hills Have Eyes (franchise).  Should it be merged?  (No content would be lost, but no reason this all can't be discussed there...) SnowFire (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Eres tú

message: Re: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eres_t%C3%BA_%28Mocedades_song%29, the article on "Eres Tú," the translation in the first line is wrong. Eres Tu does not mean "you are," rather it means, "it's you." This is an idiomatic expression. In Spanish, you say the equivalent of "You are you," whereas in English we say "It is you." Further, "you are" makes no sense as a phrase, whereas "it's you" does. Anyone who is bilingual in Spanish and English knows this. It would be easier to ask the man in the street about it than to try to look up an idiomatic expression in a grammar book. Further examples, "Soy yo" means "I am I," or "it is I." ˜˜˜˜  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nedcrouch (talk • contribs) 16:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation error

message: The direct translation of lyrics from Spanish has no correlation to the lyrics of Touch The Wind, which was recorded by Mocedades as an English version of Eres Tú. 
A real translation may be like this:
So like a promise, it is you, it is you
So like a morning in the summer
So like a smile, it is you, it is you
It's how, it's how, it is you
 
All my hope, it is you, it is you
So like a fresh rain in my hands
So like a strong breeze, it is you, it is you
It's how, it's how, it is you
 
It is you, like the water of my fountain
It is you, the fire of my hearth
It is you (you are something like that)
Like the flame of my bondfire 
It is you (you are something like that)
Like the wheat for my bread 
 
Like my poem, it is you, it is you
Like a guitar in the nighttime
Like my horizon, it is you, it is you
It's how, it's how, it is you
 
It is you, like the water of my fountain
It is you, the fire of my hearth
It is you 
Like the flame of my bondfire 
It is you (my love, you are something like that)
The wheat for my bread
--Vmsa (talk) 04:10, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lyrics 
Talk:Zoo TV: Live from Sydney

message: There is currently no cite proving there was any "Bomb Japan Now" controversy at all. No news reports from the time, no name of the "reporter." Something really needs to be added or this should be either notated as a possible urban legend or deleted. Surely there's a U2 expert out there with a press clipping or a name to share?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.232.58.2 (talk) 07:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy
Talk:War Tour

message: As far as I can tell, this is the first concert tour article in WP to get to GA or FA status.  Yay!  (I'm not counting the FA Mozart family grand tour of 1763–1766, which is clearly a different kind of beast.)  Tour articles have long been a backwater of the WP music domain, so hopefully this article can serve as an example for others to follow.  Wasted Time R (talk) 23:51, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First tour GA 

message: Can someone with access to the original source please double-check that what Bono said was, "We're an Irish band and we're here to say" rather than "...here to stay"? "Here to stay" makes more sense as he's contrasting the band with other bands just "passing through", and "here to say" would only make sense if it were followed by the statement that the band was here to say. Angr (talk) 22:32, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I double-checked the source and you're right, of course. I've fixed it; thanks for the spot.  Wasted Time R (talk) 13:41, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here to s(t)ay 

message: I was surprised to see no listing for their show in Portland back in 1983. I know they had a show here because I was there, in that firetrap known as the Paramount, with my girlfriend at the time. And it was probably the best rock concert I ever attended. Fortunately, I found this link that verifies my memory. (After all, on Wikipedia no one knows if you are a pathological liar without a reliable source.) -- llywrch (talk) 07:38, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in the Tour listings
Talk:The Joshua Tree Tour

message: The Wembley dates were Friday 12th June and Saturday 13th June. They are listed incorrectly as 11th and 12th. I know this as I went on the Saturday and went straight into a night shift at work. We only did those ahifts on a Saturday so I know this for a fact. I might be able to dig out a ticket stub as evidence. Should I edit this myself or should I provide more evidence than "I know because I was there"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.196.174.58 (talk) 06:29, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect dates for Wembley
Talk:DSL router

message: This is a tough call. There are so many people confused about a DSL router vs a DSL Modem vs a DSL gateway I opted to create this little stub instead of redirecting them to the Router article which will surely confuse an end user.
--akc9000 (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 04:22, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a lot of technological covergence going on in this field, and what used to be large, expensive, specialized and diverse utility hardware wired together into complex networks and managed by skilled network administrators has become small, simple, versatile consumer equipment installed by people who don't know a LAN from a DSLAM.  Most of these little boxes are called "router" with a prefix like "wideband" or "wireless" or other supplementary description.  Perhaps the new reality should be recognized by merging all these "x router" articles into sections of the Router article.  Of course, old-time LAN administrators, who think routers are in their baliwick, won't like it since the old distinctions are still important for their work.  Jim.henderson 14:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Jim, merging the two articles is just a terrible idea.  This is why I created this stub in the first place.  A residential gateway is NOT a router.  They are network bridges and there is already a link from this article to residential gateways.  The concept was to not confuse none computer techies.  The article was created so that it would not be merged in the first place. I could have just updated the other article but being on the network cleanup project it was decided this way.  You can leave me a message on my talk page if you would like to discuss this with me but I am going to pull the merge tag. You will really need to convince me why to put routers and bridges together and cause confusion.  I own an ISP and I deal with end users all day long that have DSL and I want to make sure they know the difference. --akc9000 (talk • contribs • &site=  count) 00:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Speaking of which, should wireless router redirect here?  Many DSL routers, including the one in the picture, are not wireless routers, and the majority of wireless routers do not include a DSL modem inside.  Jim.henderson 17:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Converged, hence merged?

message: A "DSL" router?  Why not "Broadband" router?  Even the pictured router (BEFSR41) works with a cable modem.
It's not DSL-only.
Plus there is already an article on residential gateways ... too many articles on the same thing.
:Our anonymous commentator is correct.  Broadband router already redirects to residential gateway and it seems to me this DSL router article too should be merged into the latter.  Jim.henderson 17:49, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadband router
Talk:Mehdi Ben Dhifallah

message: I have removed the prod tag because the article is about a notable footballer. He plays in the top professional league in Tunisia and has played in the African continential club championship. There are multiple reliable sources about the player (even if most are in French and/or Arabic). Best regards. Jogurney 18:38, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:WPHT

message: The whole paragraph that starts with "It should be noted that many Philadelphia area Coast to Coast AM listeners have been unhappy with WPHT's current broadcast format of C2CAM as they presently preempt the first hour (1 to 2 AM) of the live weekday broadcast with George Noory in favor of local programming." really needs to be removed. I wouldn't know, but this is so opinionated that it really needs to have citations to back up the statement. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.45.235.29 (talk • contribs).
:Though i am inclined to agree with the statement in the article, i also believe that it need to be removed, as it come off as more of an opinion then a fact, and would be difficult at best to source it out. --Boothy443 |  trácht ar 20:17, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Afouène Gharbi

message: This article covers a notable football player for one of the biggest clubs in Africa. Gharbi has appeared for Étoile du Sahel in CAF Champions League 2007 matches so he certainly should meet the notability criteria. The infobox contains plenty of information about the player which can be found at etoile-du-sahel.com. Please remove the speedy deletion tag. Jogurney 04:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contesting speedy deletion 
Talk:Watts Island Light

message: Online sources claim that this light was built in 1867. This does not appear to be correct, as conical masonry towers were not being built at such a late date. I have chosen to go with de Gast's history. Mangoe 04:46, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are correct. Dave Rebecca 19:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand "as conical masonry towers were not being built at such a late date [1867]".  I can cite many, as late as The Graves Light in 1905.  I'm certainly not expert on Virginia Lights, but it seems to me that I'd rather accept  than a second level source.. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs)  15:02, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: What I meant was that such towers weren't being built in that area; the last such built in Maryland before 1867 was lit in 1836. In any case Donahoo could not have built anything at such a late date. It should also be kept in mind that the USCG pages are constructed the same way as private sources, by volunteer researchers. They often record data that other sources do not, and their pictures are public domain; but as authorities on disputed points they are on a par with our other standard references. Mangoe (talk) 19:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Note on sources
Talk:Kamen Rider Den-O: I'm Born!

message: I've found —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, his phrase seems to be —Řÿūłóñģ (竜龍) 01:25, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Different one, —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Had you considered "The World Revolves for Me." Fractyl 00:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sieg Imagin

message: According to the blog of Hidenori Tokuyama, who played Yaguruma in Kabuto, he was offered to voice one of the movie Imagin. I'm not sure if I'm reading it properly, though.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 23:04, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guest stars 
Talk:Allen Russell

message: Baseball Reference and MLB list his career win total as 70, whereas Baseball Almanac and Baseball Cube list it as 71. The discrepancy is whether he won 6 or 7 games during the 1921 season for the Red Sox. -- GeeEachOweTeaEye (talk) 21:23, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Career wins discrepancy
Talk:Nameoki Township, Madison County, Illinois

message: According to this local government website, the meaning of the word is “fishing place.”
https://madison.illinoisgenweb.org/town_histories/nameoki/nameoki.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.242.143.36 (talk) 17:35, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of Nameoki 