lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jibbs

message: His last name is spelled "Shaw" according to his Bio page. --Richie Uchiha fan 02:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Name

message: "He is a great boxer" doesn't sound like an encyclopaedia... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.243.129.4 (talk) 03:41, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The addition of this new album to the article fails three things: WP:RS, WP:NM and WP:CBALL. Please make sure to read these three guidelines, and please, no personal attacks. DiverseMentality(Discuss it) 00:34, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: "Personal Life" section

message: Richie Uchiha  is the originator of the genre Trap Goth   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.96.25.231 (talk) 04:34, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trap Goth  
Category talk:Legal organizations

message: The :Category:Law organizations category is much larger. I suggest we merge these categories. --LQ 16:55, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They categories attempt to categories different things though, see the definition of :Category:Law organizations, which inherits from :Category:Legal organizations. Intangible 17:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Doh! You're right. But, they're not always used correctly, probably because the distinction between "law" and "legal" as a descriptor is not inherent in the term. For instance, the National Lawyers Guild doesn't regulate, nor do many other bar associations -- city bar associations, for instance. In fact, only some state bar associations regulate (e.g., California); others are voluntary associations and do not have regulatory functions (e.g., Massachusetts).  That distinction is going to be verrrry confusing for people looking for associations, and finding some bar assns in one category and others in another. Maybe the useful distinction is "associations of lawyers" versus other law-related associations? ... or, perhaps, "Legal regulatory associations" as a subcategory of law-related associations?  --LQ 17:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not used right at all. I renew the idea to merge. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006 comments
Talk:Seison Maeda

message: I have some serious questions about the assertion that Seison was instrumental in founding the 'Nihonga Movement'.  If truly (as I also believe) the foundations of Nihonga are in the Meiji period, it would be highly unlikely for Seison to have been instrumental, considering his birthdate. Rawkcuf (talk) 11:46, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lerotholi Polytechnic FC

message: There is no King Lerotholi 2 listed on List of Kings of Lesotho.  IMO, the most likely candidate looks like Paramount Chief Letsie II Lerotholi PRB (talk) 17:17, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is the poly named after? 
Talk:Ghada Karmi

message: Apart from the title of her book and a recount of the story in an epigraph at the start, the bride story plays an insignificant part in her book. There are two very brief references to it in over 300 pages and no conclusion is drawn in either case. The claim from a biased source that she "admitted that the phrase ... was not based on facts", implying that she knew it was a false story, is a BLP violation. What she actually admitted was that she got the story from Avi Shlaim and didn't have a primary source for it. That's entirely different; the difference between non-ethical and ethical behavior for a historian. Zerotalk 01:54, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  the beautiful bride
Talk:Charles Arbuthnot (disambiguation)

message: Huh.  Three military men and one politician.  Were they related? -Toptomcat 17:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. - Kittybrewster 23:47, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Intriguing.  The Arbuthnot line may deserve an article. -Toptomcat 02:24, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mario Pei

message: Divulgational?  You mean, revealing someone else's secrets?  Whose secrets?
Jim.henderson 17:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sonny Tufts

message: Just how well-known was this legend? Tufts appears in an episode of Rowan and Martin's Laugh-In shortly before his death, in which he sits in a director's chair with his name on it (so we all know who he is) and says the name of celebrities in the same aghast tone. Brithgob 05:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urban Legend 

message: I'm no fan of Sonny Tufts'. But this article is little more than a belittling of his career -- and by implication, the man. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 18:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: not a "nice" article
Talk:Clown society

message: I strongly appose the redirect from Sacred Clown.  Although these are related, they are not identical concepts.  And the redirect should only be used for indentical concepts.
I *strongly* oppose this move.  Please eliminate the redirect you created.
Lesotho 17:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: --Zephirum 09:03, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requesting source for statement 

message: as a general rule A COMEDIAN says funny things and A COMIC does funny things. Taking the analogy a stage further A COMIC does funny things and A CLOWN IS funny in the sense that he embodies all the comedic elements with his body and appearance  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.101.166.171 (talk) 11:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  no 

message: "Circus clowns were the only persons allowed to criticize the government of the former Soviet Union." -- I was born in USSR, but never heard of this. --Cognoscent (talk) 07:16, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviet Union
Talk:Social innovation

message: becasue the issue is of equal importance to sociology.--Islescape 21:28, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: removing economics stub tag

message: We should not simplify the implications of social innovation in territorial development as it is much more than mere "regional and local economic development"--Islescape 17:11, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: social innovation and territorial development

message: Used links to business websites so people could check that info themselves. Will take down if it is too misleading. —Preceding unsigned comment added by  71.232.78.52  (talk • contribs) 19:56, 19 December 2007
:What we need instead are links (or just references) to sources that actually mention the information.  See WP:V. --Ronz (talk) 20:03, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: links to business websites

message: Can the link in refernces be used as external links? —Preceding unsigned comment added by  71.232.78.52 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 19 December 2007
:Probably not.  WP:EL has the basic guidelines for what goes in the External links section. --Ronz (talk) 20:04, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: can references be replaced as external links?

message: Can I use european commision draft a reference?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.78.52 (talk) 20:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm open to keeping that one for now.  We might want to take another look at it later. --Ronz (talk) 20:19, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: can I still use the european commision draft as a reference?

message: I added some information, but I want to make sure it is not misleading  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.78.52 (talk) 22:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: can somone check over again?

message: Folks, the link to Phills et al. (2008) is broken so that we could either add the link to the (closed access) paper (https://ssir.org/articles/entry/rediscovering_social_innovation#) or the PDF on ResearchGate (but I suppose there is a policy in Wikipedia against referencing deep links on ResearchGate?) --Alex Gerber (talk) 11:44, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken link in the references
Talk:1955 seizure of the Romanian embassy in Bern

message: This could use much more specific citation. In particular, who were the "Some commentators" who "have suggested that the group was indeed acting on behalf of a foreign intelligence service"? - Jmabel | Talk 17:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That sounds to me like enough to justify the remark. - Jmabel | Talk 00:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation?
Talk:Laurel Mountain

message: I say keep it... There are still other "Laurel Mountains"...  Valerius Tygart 17:13, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I nominated when there were two red links, now that there is one, it'll most likely be kept.  Also, you should put this at the AFD discussion, not the talk page.  DoomsDay349   Happy Halloween! 21:02, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Namechecking

message: AfD matter, not CSD.  I would delete it, but the violation of the deletion guideline is "dictionary definition," and it doesn't violate any of the speedy delete criteria.  Geogre 17:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

message: Ok, this will be very vague, but hear goes: I seem to remember a certain company offering to pay artists for every time their product/company name was heard on the radio during one of the artists songs...i also remember hearing about an artist who made a song with the product/company name repeated ten times followed by "now where's my cheque?". does anyone else know what im talking about and who/where/when this was? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.4.74.65 (talk) 17:08, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  any idea?
Talk:Olympic Committee of Portugal

message: This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of February 20, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: The article would have passed this criteria, prose was engaging and made me want to know more, if it hadn't been for half of the article being in list formats. The lists need to be converted to prose.
:2. Factually accurate?: Sources seemed to support assertions
:3. Broad in coverage?: Failed this criteria. Almost nothing about their actual activities, what was there was in a list titled objects
:4. Neutral point of view?: There were questionable assertions that were really just POV masquerading as fact.
Example: Despite political pressure and government funding cuts, the COP set up a public fundraising campaign and, with the IOC's support, managed to send a symbolic delegation to the boycotted Moscow Games, thus displaying a strong loyalty to the Olympic values.
That's a major assertion. It implies there was nothing political at all behind the decision just the commitment to the Olympic values, which I doubt is true.
:5. Article stability? Looks stable yes, no overt vandalism that I could see
:6. Images?: Failed. No images aside from a logo, which doesn't add a lot.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration.  Thanks for your work so far. 
--A mcmurray 19:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination
Talk:Tyrrell 003

message: This page should be expanded to describe the entire 001-004 chassis series. 003 is arguably the most significant, but all four cars were virtually identical and crucial to the effort, and the entire evolution of the group should be described.
Will102 (talk) 23:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Recommended Revision

message: The picture of the car supposedly from the 1972 French Grand Prix is actually from the 1972 Argentinian Grand Prix. You can see this by the numbers, which were supplied by the GP organization at the time, that are sponsored by YPF, the Argentinian National Oil Company 177.142.34.178 (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this is correct; Stewart carried '21' in Argentina but '4' in France. The description is correctly shown as Argentina at Commons but has somehow been changed to France when the image is clicked on within the article. Eagleash (talk) 17:56, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture not from French GP in 1972
Talk:C81 (album)

message: How many did C81 actually sell. The stylus article quoting the rough trade compiler; Christopher Rose says 15,000.
Simon Reynolds in Rip It up and Start Again says 30K. any more for any more ? Jem 17:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, great little article: and I am glad that C81 is being credited as more pivotal than C86. Unfortunately the sales figures I could not accurately say; probably less than both figures. I would err on the side of Mr Rose - as 30,000 divided by 2 vouchers does make 15,000 → friedfish 17:40, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The reference cited after the sentence that gives a sales figure says "over 15,000", and that is what the text should say; otherwise the reference should be changed. Neither C81 nor C86 should be credited by the text as being pivotal, unless this opinion can be referenced and attributed to a notable source. I do not understand what point you are trying to make by dividing 30,000 into two. -Ashley Pomeroy 18:09, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hillview High School

message: I took them, there is absolutely no copyright infringement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.205.142.75 (talk) 06:51, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is taking away the photographs 

message: Not sure it is actually the one I copied...
(but certainly more dignified than the new anthem which sounds like a cheerleader's song)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.205.142.75 (talk) 17:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Hymn 

message: I left this school in the mid sixties, and after traveling around the world for a while i settled in Dublin Ireland, my name is Douglas Brown and i will like to get in touch with anybody that was in the school around that time. i will also like to get in touch with Etian Labauschne ( Please excuse the spelling but i have been away for a long time, he was the Manual Training teacher when i left and i have heard say that he rose to the dizzy heights of Head master, My e-mail address is 2dougbrowne@eircom.net.
THIS IS MAN DK JUST WANTED TO HALLA AT THE MATRIC 07 GROUP... YOL R ROCKERS... EMAIL ADDRESS IS kwanie_dkwassa@yahoo.com... WE SHOULD HOOK UP SOMETIME...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.54.202.74 (talk) 09:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Former Students & Teachers

message: Since there is also a Hillview High School in the Tustin Unified School District in Orange County, California, Hillview High School will, eventually, need to become a disambiguation page. BlankVerse 04:31, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: disambiguation
Talk:Timeline of African-American firsts

message: I have just removed an addition] based primarily on it being a first for an African-American woman (the other problem could have been corrected).
IMO, this article is about the first African-American to do something noteworthy. If we decide to go beyond that to the first AA woman to do something, we will need to come to a consensus in that regard and decide if that is the only exception. Otherwise, we can reasonably expect additions of the first AA Latinx, first LGBTQ AA, first immigrant AA, etc. - SummerPhDv2.0 17:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. From a bit of a look at the page, we already have a number of first AA women here. Our current inro text says "first achievements by African Americans" which, to my reading, would not include the first AA woman. Thoughts? - SummerPhDv2.0 17:51, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

text: I completely agree that it should be limited to African-American firsts and not include African-American woman firsts. That's not what the article is about. Adding that qualifier alone risks multiplying the size of the list by two. --Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 23:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  First African-American woman 

message: The Wikipedia article for the Freedom House Ambulance Service article starts with the following sentences:  Freedom House Ambulance Service was the first emergency medical service in the United States to be staffed by paramedics with medical training beyond basic first aid. Founded in 1967 to serve the predominantly black Hill District of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, the majority of its staff were African-American.  Is this enough to qualify Freedom House Ambulance Service as an African-American first for the purpose of this article? --HugoHelp (talk) 02:48, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  First emergency medical service to be staffed by paramedics  

message: Still hoping for this person to exist soon 2600:1700:290:B980:9079:DF5F:1887:C11B (talk) 17:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st black person to not have a big deal made about them as the first black person to do something
Talk:Shark anatomy

message: This page could use a lot of work. A possible change could be having "integument" as its own heading and rearranging the order to have "skin" as a subheading and then "placoid scales" as a subheading along with adding "ampullae of Lorenzini" as another subheading. These are all components of the integument, so rearranging the order here could be very beneficial. The "placoid scale" main article should also be switched to dermal denticle, and this article needs to be deleted from the "integument" section. The first paragraph of the "integument" section could also use some citations. The "muscles" section could also benefit from being split off into two more subheadings that would "red locomotor muscle" and "white locomotor muscle" which are the two main muscles in sharks. This page as a whole could also use more images, specifically under the "muscles" section along with the "integument" section. AlyssaJordan (talk) 01:13, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Edits For This Page  

message: This page could really benefit from adding the five chordate synapomorphies and how they evolved to benefit sharks; this could be placed at the beginning of the page to set up the rest of the topics discussed. I also believe that the Shark "Internal Organ" section really needs improvement and edits especially since the section is currently incomplete and missing key elements/ structures. The page overall could also benefit from more images too. Taylorstokes21 (talk) 20:46, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Edits for the page
Talk:Devocalization

message: I'm not an editor, but I doubt these phrases meet Wikipedia's standards:
"The owners can live in peace, they may even devocalize human children who they don't want to hear.
The owners can relax and not have to train their dog. They can also remove teeth to avoid any further nuisance."
Just wanting to give a heads up. 2601:8C3:8680:37C0:2EF3:2394:FF1:8B2C (talk) 00:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A troll has clearly been at the "reasons favoring" section
Talk:Piebald

message: Is this related to the patchy multi-colored Calico Cat?  If so, maybe a link in the see also section is relevant?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.156.233.187 (talk) 21:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calico Cat 

message: Is there a simple method to add a photo to the Other Animals section? Wikita (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See Help:Pictures and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images. Wikipedia:Image use policy is also relevant, on not using someone else's copyrighted material. More on images and Wikipedia is indexed at Wikipedia:Images.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  01:14, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding examples
Talk:Snout

message: Should it be mentioned in the paragraph referring to the stop that the Bull Terrier is the only recognized breed without a stop on its snout, or am I mistaken? Kurtto 02:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bull Terriers 

message: This article should be a few lines in the article on Dog Terminology.--Hafwyn (talk) 00:09, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But don't lots of other animals have snouts, like horses?  I think even cats have little snouts. KenFehling (talk) 16:11, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Many insects have snouts, need a section on them. -- Dougher (talk) 14:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need section on snouts of insects 

message: "Despite the opinion of some disreputable horse handlers, horses indeed have snouts."
I'm not sure I understand. Wouldn't that make them misinformed or just plain wrong? Just not having your facts straight doesn't make you disreputable, so how are they disreputable specifically? Maybe this could be clarified? 50.30.49.13 (talk) 02:46, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lolwut? Horses? 

message: That's the general vibe I get from this article. As a goat person, I'm slightly (yet terribly) offended. Nice to at least hear that the rest have snouts, though. And the three pictures (sort of) speak three thousand words. But still, there are four thousand words about dog snouts.
I'll be back here in one year. I hope to learn more when I return. InedibleHulk (talk) 20:27, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry this offended you, but I wonder why you, as a goat person, didn't just do the right thing and do a write-up on goat snouts? 2606:A000:7D22:FD00:25:A7B1:89D7:57C3 (talk) 01:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dogs rule, every other animal on Earth drools?
Talk:Beaufort Castle, Scotland

message: in the sense that it imitated a defensive style that had been out of date for at least several hundred yearsCinnamon colbert (talk) 20:16, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: faux castle

message: image added, now it needs an infobox
Mephiston999 (talk) 12:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: images

message: The Gaelic form of the name was given as "Caisteal Duuaidh," and this appears in a few websites across the internet.  However, Scottish Gaelic has never used repeated vowels, which means that this spelling cannot possibly be correct.  On a Clan Fraser webpage (http://www.1066.co.nz/Mosaic%20DVD/whoswho/text/Clan_Fraser[1].htm), we find the following: "Two Fraser war cries have been largely recognized, both in Gaelic. The first, "Caisteal Dhuni" (Castle Dounie/Downie) refers to the ancestral Castle and Clan seat, which once existed near the present Beaufort Castle."  This shows that there was an "n" in the original name.  A list of original Gaelic placenames on a website linked to Sabhal Mòr Ostaig (http://www.smo.uhi.ac.uk/~15007346/modCoimp/stordata.php) gives the correct version as "Caisteal Dhùnaidh" at no. 114 on the list.  I have therefore corrected the Gaelic name on this page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.168.24 (talk) 13:00, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caisteal Dhùnaidh
Talk:Hispaniolan palm crow

message: I can't see any reason to split this article, it covers a single species and therefore all the information is relevant. If the subspecies was split into a second article I don't think any value would be added. JohnCastle 17:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Since the tag was added more than 5 months ago, and nothing has resulted, I'll remove it.--Hey jude, don't let me down 02:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split
Talk:Withers

message: I don't think this is right.  14.2 hands is exactly 58 inches, as the .2 is base 4, i.e., half a hand, i.e., 2 inches.  58 inches = 1.47 meeters,  Why is this off by slightly more than an inch? 128.84.234.94 (talk) 06:43, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: and ponies are up to 14.2 hands (1.44 m)
Talk:Modern furniture

message: I took the liberty of correcting an erroneous reference to Eileen Grey's educational background as having included study at the Bauhaus. At no time was Grey a student at the Bauhaus. During the entire span of the Bauhaus's existence (1919-1933), Grey was engaged in a successful career based primarily in Paris.Snared (talk) 04:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction to Eileen Grey information 

message: Why are there no pictures? Moonraker0022 (talk) 05:04, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  pictures