lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Giant Steps

message: The article needs to take into account and discuss the different versions of the album that have been released over the years.  The current page is based on the inital CD release, which is not current with newer re-releases by Rhino.  --Viriditas  | Talk 02:42, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Rhino? The only special thing that release has is additional alternate takes. I think it's more important to establish the contents of the original LP release, and the subsequent Atlantic CD release. I'll get around to it. - mako 22:02, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I wasn't arguing the importance of such an addition.  Simply put, this is a request for content on version history.  The history should include mention of the original release; the standard, remastered CD release (Atlantic, October 25, 1990) which includes five bonus tracks, currently listed in the article; Giant Steps - Gold (Mobile Fidelity, July 12, 1994); remastered, new liner notes, total of five bonus tracks, two additional alternate takes of "Giant Steps" and a second alternate take of "Naima" on Giant Steps - Deluxe Edition (Rhino Records, March 3, 1998); two versions (possibly identical as limited edition reissues) of The Heavyweight Champion: The Complete Atlantic Recordings of John Coltrane - Box Set (Rhino Records, August 15, 1995 and Year 2000 Second Edition Box Set); three-disc pack (appears to be deluxe edition), Legendary Jazz (Rhino, 1998). --Viriditas  | Talk 04:29, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: With all those different releases, I see your point. It might take quite a bit of digging around for info. - mako 05:12, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Different versions

message: Despite the year it came out, this song is not hard bop.  It's bebop.  In fact, it's unmistakable bebop.  Considering that many people take Wikipedia to be canonical, this really needs to get fixed -- in fact, this might be a canonical bebop tune.
Sliver (talk) 23:48, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre

message: Hey I removed this, I'm not coming back here I was a jazz major I disagree with this sentence and the citation hasn't been added for years.
The ability to play over the Giant Steps cycle remains to this day one of the benchmark standards by which a jazz musician's improvising skill is measured.
If anything needs to be done email me. Burnedfaceless (talk) 19:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: removal
Talk:Battles of the War of 1812

message: Does this list contain battles that were fought on United States territory only? I can think of several that are missing, so I assume that must be the case. If so we should make note of that. Adam Bishop 02:47, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I got it from the site linked in the article, which only handled U.S. battlegrounds, so I guess so. --brian0918 04:35, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: I completely replaced it with another, hopefully more complete, list of battles. --brian0918 21:49, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Battles of the War of 1812

message: More info on the battles of the war of 1812 can be found at these websites
* 
* Chronology of the War of 1812
Since this page is very simlar to Chronology of the War of 1812 i think that there should be links between them. Thanks. Sirtrebuchet 04:23, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info can be found at 

message: Hi, this article seems like a list and it should be renamed to something like "List of Battles of the War of 1812" Cocoaguy ここがいいcontribstalk Review Me! 17:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-name
Talk:Fort Harrison, Indiana

message: *This article needs in line citations to improve its class rating. Also the Introduction paragraph needs to be worked on. It doesn't explain the article well. -Jahnx (talk) 09:47, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the "no sources" box at the top, but this article still only has two main sources and a couple minor ones.  We could use more sources for the bibliography, if anyone here has some. Mingusboodle (talk) 05:23, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Indiana assessment

message: I've added a subsection called "Attacks at the Narrows", which deal with the attacks on the supply wagons sent to relieve Fort Harrison.  If someone thinks that should be a separate article, feel free to created it.  I almost did the same thing, but finally decided to add it here, since the supplies were sent to relieve the starving survivors (and reinforcements) of the Battle of Fort Harrison, and since the attacks meant that those supplies would not reach Fort Harrison.
I also tagged the Lamotte Prairie massacre at the end, since it was executed by the same band that carried out the attacks at the Narrows.  I realize this has less to do with Fort Harrison, but since there wasn't enough to justify a new article on the Lamotte massacre and it was the same war party, I put it here.Mingusboodle (talk) 04:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a thought... is it better to combine all the casualties from the siege of Fort Harrison and the attacks on the supply wagons in the top infobox, or would it be better to have a separate infobox for the attacks at the Narrows?  I don't think I've ever seen an article with two infoboxes, but that doesn't mean it couldn't be done.Mingusboodle (talk) 05:25, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Attacks at the Narrows

message: We have an article on a battle at this fort, but no article on the fort itself?  The history and significance of the fort exceeds the one battle, though I'll concede that this fort had a very short lifetime, 1811-1818.  Maybe the only event of note (i.e. described in the encyclopedia anywhere) is that battle.  Nonetheless, the structure is kind of awkward.  I think the article ought to be the name of the fort, and the battle a section within that article.  There could be a section on what preceded the building of the fort, and another for history after the war of 1812, and yet another for what became of the fort and what is left of it today. Sbalfour (talk) 16:29, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restructure article
Talk:Pittsburgh Steelers

message: "change 'Since 2001, however, a new generation of Steeler greats made Acrisure Stadium legendary,' to 'Since 2001, however, a new generation of Steeler greats made Heinz Field legendary,'"
"after this line add 'as of july 12, 2022 The Pittsburgh Steelers renamed their stadium to Acrisure Stadium in a deal with Acrisure which is a Fintech Global Insurance Broker. The 2022 NFL seasons marks the first season the steelers will play under Acrisure. Details of Acrisure's and the Steelers' 15 year agreement has not been released"  https://www.steelers.com/news/steelers-acrisure-announce-partnership-for-stadium-naming-rights  Christian.Roa (talk) 14:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed your second part because of grammatical errors and unnecessary information. Aaron Liu (talk) 11:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 October 2022 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Pittsburgh Reelers and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 4#Pittsburgh Reelers until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm  Talk 15:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Pittsburgh Reelers" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Earlier in the year Pittsburghs president, Art Rooney, announced the team would wear a New Jersey with a custom patch and there 70s style “block numbers” for the 50th anniversary of Franco Harris’s immaculate reception. I know it’s not a huge change but I think it should be added to their 2022 season page! 2600:1004:B08E:13C1:718D:5F84:C74E:9E7 (talk) 21:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New uniforms 

message: ￼ Even though this is a very long and ongoing debate, the Steelers haven't been good since like 2010. The GM's suck so much and the team is a disappointment. So even though this is very much debated by Ravens and Steelers fans, it's clear, the steelers suck. OGABOOGADUNDALUNDA (talk) 15:14, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for clearing that up. Bringingthewood (talk) 01:22, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Debate on why the Steelers suck 

message: I would like to get a cravat for my Brother in law, he is biggest fan, and as a surprise for him, I would like to buy a cravat with the Steelers logo on. my email is p_dobson@[[User:Hotmail.com|hotmail.com.
Regards Peter. 82.14.250.80 (talk) 10:11, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where can I buy a Steelers cravat 

message: I want izaiah gathings as a member of the roster he was recently signed by the steelers but is not shown on the roster 2605:A601:AF53:5800:B908:BAC3:59BF:223A (talk) 03:36, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2024
Talk:Unconscious communication

message: This article explicitly links unconscious communication and honest signals by essentially saying the terms are interchangeable. There is however a difference and the discussion of honest signals is very limited. Honest signals are not only involuntary behaviours but also physical attributes - for example, peacocks and their tail. This communication however is not unconscious, as peahens are aware their mate choice is based on male tail quality, and so the two should be clearly differentiated or explained. Real world examples to illustrate this, such as the aforementioned, would also help our understanding.
This leads me to my next point. Visual illustrations may allow for a better read and allow the audience to feel more engaged. With regards to Freud's theory, there are many visual models describing it and so one of these could be placed in the relevant section to increase readability. Tables or graphs illustrating the points of mentioned studies could also be included for this reason.
To finish, the article itself is very brief and so may not be clear enough for the layperson. Having to research or clarify points further when reading an article is not ideal and so it may be beneficial to expand the discussion further. 
Psuneh (talk) 22:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement Suggestions 

message: How can an article use the word unconscious and totally neglect its meaning by ignoring psychoanalysis is beyond any explanation...
Freud has used selected examples of unconscious communication that indicate its significance in the phenomena concerning the prevalence of the Unconscious. That is unconscious communication.
Beickus (talk) 19:44, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad article
Talk:Old Ruthenian language/Archive 1

message: If the information in Great Russian language is correct, then this article could un-orphan that one. Someone knowledgeable in the subject please deal with it. --Joy [shallot] 13:52, 29 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this article renders a confusing (at best) image of history. In the XVth century, the Union of Poland-Lithuania included most of Belarus and half of Ukraine, and Belarussian was indeed the official language of administration at a time - but that is Belarussian, not (old) Russian. As far as modern-day Poland and Lithuania are concerned, no part of their current territory has ever been of Russian language. Failing to remind that borders in that area of Europe have been moving may lead people to make a false point that modern-day Russia has a legitimate claim onto modern-day Poland and Lithuania, on the basis of fuzzy linguistic references. I quite understand why Genyo would see Russian imperialism in that Philippe Magnabosco 14:49, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 

message: I think "Old Ruthenian" is the appropriate name.
PS. And "Old Belarusian" is even better, because I have listened to audio tapes from Euphrosyne of Polatsk, Francysk Skaryna and Symon Budny. ;)) --rydel 01:08, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well-preserved tapes, I guess? :-) Mikkalai 16:55, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Against moving. Old Ruthenian is fine
Talk:Secretum Secretorum

message: A paragraph or two in the "Origins" section is copied verbatim from:
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/arabic/physiognomy2.html
which is in the PD covered by 
--Stbalbach 04:25, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: This whole article has been copied, in many places word-for-word, from the NIH website listed above... http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/arabic/physiognomy2.html... The whole opening of the article is a word-for-word copy from this website... Just because it is at the NIH does not make it available for stealing... Stevenmitchell (talk) 05:41, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: In the article there is a hyperlink on the mention of Philip of Tripoli to the wiki site of Philip of Antioch (also known as Philip of Tripoli) but these cannot be the same people.  The translator of the "Secretum Secretorum" was a cleric who did his translation circa 1232 and dedicated it to the Bishop Guy of Tripoli.  Philip of Antioch was a king who died in 1225.  They cannot be the same people!  Please check this.  If I am right, you have to remove that hyperlink.  Kakorn8 (talk) 07:10, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Philip of Tripoli vs Philip of Antioch

message: The links in the opening section for Statecraft and Ethics currently link to Political Aspects of Islam and Islamic Ethics. Should this be the case?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:8C3:4180:4210:49E9:F15E:6B7F:750E (talk) 01:00, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: These were probably added because a major part of the text was written during the 10th-century in an Islamic environment. However, the original text was written centuries earlier either in Greek or Syriac, so these links weren't really on point. The lead was overlinked anyway, so I removed some other links too (here). In the future, please be WP:BOLD and remove the links yourself, though don't forget to indicate in the edit summary why you removed them. Thanks, ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 12:14, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Links in the lead
Talk:Tori Spelling

message: Removed "* My Father was a Cheap Bastard (2006)" from Television work section as it is an obvious form of vandalism. luckado 13:55, 28 Aug 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: What is her father's estate worth? Article states $500 million and then $300 million.--RexRex84 23:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It might be even less after the 2009 crash.Landroo (talk) 14:37, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Father's net worth 

message: The source given for her ordination in a church does not contain that information as of today.  A better source is needed.  Zaslav (talk) 10:25, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous citation
Talk:Church of God in Christ, Mennonite

message: "keeping the avoidance with love" is a phrase that only seems to appear on the Internet on this Wikipedia article. I have no idea what it means. Was some kind of context removed? A5 (talk) 07:35, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "keeping the avoidance with love" 

message: One of the revisions claiming to "add a source" added:
This book is self-published and does not seem to be relevant to the 2016 abuse allegations at all. If there is a reason to cite this book, it should be in its own section and referred to separately. I cannot find anything published anywhere about the claims of this specific book, whereas the 2016 abuse allegations are well-sources from various news outlets. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FManz (talk • contribs) 18:53, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-promotion of book under 2016 Abuse Allegations section 

message: The section on 2022 Abuse Allegations is entirely sourced by Mennonite Abuse Prevention and appears to have been added by the same organization. This allegation should be sourced from something beside the organization making the allegation itself. FelizManz (talk) 18:15, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research by Mennonite Abuse Prevention
Talk:Streamliner/to do

message: * Ambiguous: Streamliner is also the name of the first maglev left ventricular assist device (LVAD heart pump) to reach animal trials in the world. Disambiguation needed.
* Should this page stay North America-only?
* Foreign influences and influenced should be mentioned:
** Flying Hamburger -- done Ironmani 23:25, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Jean Françaix

message: Grove has surprisingly little to say about him after his early life. Then again perhaps all the space they has allocated for his was taken up by a listing of works. :-) Mindspillage (spill your mind?) 05:07, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's surprisingly slim!  The only information at all that they include is that he made piano tours with his daughter.  There's a bit more, but not much, on his official website (www.jeanfrancaix.org).  Grove almost always has an exhaustive works list for composers (and boy do I use that a lot.) Antandrus 05:29, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jamaal Magloire

message: I created the page since he's a notable player, but to be honest all I know about Magloire I learned from reading his official player bio, so if someone would like to go into more detail, be my guest!  ;)  ekedolphin 05:50, Jan 2, 2005 (UTC)
I have a question about the last short sentence. It says that "He becomes a free agent on July 1 2007." I typed this message on June 8 2007. Unless you can see the future, I don't think the sentence is true.
Free-agency begins on July 1st of the year your contract expires.  So, the original author, knowing that Magloire's contract expired in 2007 also knew that he would automatcally become a free-agent on that date. Groovenow (talk) 17:14, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Misty (satellite program)

message: I have a silly question. You wrote: "Misty is reported to have optical and radar stealth characteristics, preventing it from being detectable by other nations". 
Well, if this gadget is stealthy, so why could some amateur astronomers track it? Please, don't take that personally. I really don't want to insult you. But it really doesn't make any sense to me. Surely, the unknown satellite these observers tracked must be a military one. But it cannot be a stealth satellite. 141.2.22.211 14:43, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I have to correct myself: My conclusion is wrong, as it was built on a somewhat weak premise. Just ignore my question. 141.2.22.211 11:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stealthy or not stealthy, that's the question 

message: Conspiracy theories, anyone? US Patent 103,909 was issued in 1870, and describes a metal polishing paste. If you're going to make stuff up, at least look up the patent number so you don't look foolish.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.188.235 (talk) 04:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, now it changed to U.S. Patent #6,103,909; which is a chemical process. Someone made it up and I've removed it. --129.65.145.172 (talk) 17:31, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FUD 

message: This seems speculative to me so I moved it to talk. RJFJR (talk) 02:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Construction
Talk:Game Boy Advance SP

message: Where did said book get this information? It's not listed as far as I'm aware and I can't find any other source saying it has a 50hz screen. Everything else says 60hz. For various technical reasons the 101 having a 50hz screen doesn't even make sense. 2601:45:8100:1360:0:0:0:97E6 (talk) 00:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The source for the AGS-101 having a 50hz screen is some random book.
Talk:Polish–Russian War of 1792

message: Catherine II did not see the polish renegades who revolted against their king as ``Poland. Around the time of the events, the perception was that kingdom was granted upon the king by God and anyone opposing this was also opposing God, which was unthinkable and ridiculous. Catherine II and Frederik of Prussia were defending the Monarchy, with wide support from European states (with the exception of France for obvious reasons). The russian forces, experienced with the just-completed wars versus Turkey and Sweden, and lead by the legendary generalisimus Alexander Suvorov, ``freed Poland from the ``vile constitution, being outnumbered more than 2 to 1.--61.68.195.126 12:27, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the source of this? While it is important to add a note about monarchist POV, it is undeniable that Frederik used this is a pretext for partitions of Poland. Of course all partitioners used many similar explanation to explain why they had many perfectly good reasons for the invasion and annexation. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 18:38, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Motives

message: Where did you get those 20,000 confederates? As far as I know targowiczanie had no army to speak of, they entirely depended on the russian troops. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.18.170.26 (talk) 21:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  20,000? 

message: I think it would be a good idea to rename this article to: Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth–Russian War of 1792 Samogitia (talk) 11:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope; this is not a common name, and the dash in Polish-Lithuanian makes this construction confusing. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:05, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Composers/Composers

message: A Filipino Composer who do all his compositions on the spot using indigenous instruments and found objects.He is recording all his compositions on video and mp3 formats.121.54.58.135 (talk) 19:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: A search on Google does not reveal any biographical sources, nor any sources that talk about him.  A Wikipedia article can not be written unless there is published information about the person.  Do you know of any such information? -- kosboot (talk) 20:08, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ato Mariano