lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Guanosine pentaphosphate

message: This page has good information. Not certain on the citations, but it should be more properly organized. It would be easier to understand and find information that way. I don't know this material enough yet.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.140.105.70 (talk) 19:10, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs better formatting

message: I agree with the user above, this article has great information although I wonder if ppGpp should be properly distinguished from pppGpp since they have different structures and potencies? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23620295/#:~:text=In%20vivo%20and%20in%20vitro,promoter%20activation%20and%20RpoS%20induction.
Nkmunch (talk) 00:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate topics?
Talk:Wanda Jean Allen

message: I removed the 'cleanup' sticker because the page looks ok to me, but I think it needs at least one reference.  Please find one.Seth J. Frantzman 23:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who is the "he" being referenced in the "Background" section?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.187.112.28 (talk) 21:52, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, it might be a wee bit helpful if the references that were supposedly used for this entry were actually numbered and cited appropriately in the body of the text.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.152.197 (talk) 05:26, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "He?' 

message: I have removed the prod for the proposed deletion of this article. A nomination here merits further consideration and editor discussion. Plutonium27 (talk) 03:16, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Attempted to notify User:Claritas - who prodded this on the 02/09 - but he retired the following day. I shall not be taking this to AfD. Plutonium27 (talk) 03:35, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:Proposed deletion]] - prod removed 
Talk:Tank Stream

message: Just for the record: the tanks 'constructed' were sumps or sinks cut into the Hawkesbury sandstone on which Sydney stands (and from which much of early Sydney was built). They were below-ground reservoirs, open to the sky, catching  and damming the flow. There are instances of citizens being fined or flogged for fouling the vital Tank Stream waters. See here: http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article628072/
Amused that this poor old ditch has been politicised. What an odd age we live in.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.12.111 (talk) 23:36, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Tanks' were sumps 

message: The source co-ordinates show the stream as originating north of Sydney Cove, whereas it is in fact a southern tributary.Dr. British12 (talk) 17:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source coordinates issues
Talk:Nesopupa turtoni

message: According to the article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosperous_Bay_Plain, it is not extinct.
Kevink707 (talk) 15:41, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A note
Talk:Center (algebra)

message: I don't think that one should write
"The center is a commutative subring of R, so R is an algebra over its center."
This gives the impression that every ring R is an algebra over every commutative subring, which is false, take for example the quaternions as a ring and the complex numbers as a commutative subring.
Maybe one should omit the word "so" and everything's fine?
-- 130.83.2.27 10:51, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed "so" to "and". Thanks for noticing.--Roentgenium111 (talk) 23:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subring 

message: In the cases of groups and rings, the center defines a functor Grp → Ab and Ring → CRing. I think that merits each of those having their own page, or at least vastly expanded sections rather than disambiguation. 
I don't know if in either case it is a left or right adjoint. I know the inclusion CRing → Ring is continuous, preserving products, pullbacks, the terminal object, and other limits, and I'd thought maybe the center of rings functor preserved colimits, but I'm not 100% sure that the coproduct of rings, the free product, is taken to the coproduct of commutative rings (the tensor product over ℤ). Does anyone know any more about this? I'd sure appreciate some references for further reading on the category of rings and commutative rings. Much thanks. 
--Daviddwd (talk) 21:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The center is not functorial, neither for groups nor for rings. The inclusion of {e, (1 2)} into S3, for example, is a group homomorphism that does not restrict to a homomorphism between centers. Also, the inclusion of C into H (the Hamiltonian quaternions) is a ring homomorphism out of a commutative ring whose image is not central, which means that H is not a C-algebra, but is an R-algebra because Z(H) = R. The inclusion functors do not preserve colimits, so they cannot have right adjoints. The left adjoints are given by abelianization and an analogous quotient for rings (quotient out by the 2-sided ideal generated by all ring-theoretic commutators xy − yx), respectively. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:54, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Functoriality
Talk:Le Championnat (TV series)

message: Does anyone know the music for the introduction, round-up or Goal of the season?
MiddlesbroughFan 10:51, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nasi dagang

message: I intend to remove the "Erroneous claim" section of the article, as not only is it not sourced, but frankly irrelevant/non-useful information. Any objections can be discussed here in reply. Sisuvia (talk) 23:45, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing 'Erroneous claim' section
Talk:Porsche 989

message: The photos used in the article are not representative of the original 1988 design for the 989, but the final production proposal from 1991. Most people seem to ignorantly mistake the most common prototype example to be from 1988, but making this comparison would prove the obvious. This photo is of the 1988 version taken on March 6, 1990, with these other photos being the 1991 989 production-representative version, planned for 1994-early 1995. The 986 and 996 were designed in 1992-1993 subsequently. Clearly by March 1990, the 989 still looked like that 1988 early concept example that echoed the upcoming 968, and not the more resolved design of 1991. Surely Porsche designers are talented, but not so talented that they created that design 10 years early. It took 3 years to reach that, likely not being frozen until early 1992 if fully realised.–––Carmaker1 (talk) 00:55, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development Timeline
Talk:The One Where the Monkey Gets Away

message: The individual episode articles for Friends (season one) are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines.  Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:List of Friends episodes#Episode article review (Season 1). Eusebeus 11:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notice of episode article review 

message: At present, there's no indication that this episode is independently notable. It doesn't at the moment have a single high-quality source that asserts notability, so it doesn't yet pass the general notability guideline. --Slashme (talk) 13:11, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  What are your thoughts, about this and the other ones you have recently created articles for? —Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:48, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs improvement, most of the other episodes i created articles for are fine. The Optimistic One (talk) 14:54, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  The issue I have isn't the quality of the article; it's the notability of the topic. Of the four refs you have at the moment, the only one with any editorial oversight is the AV Club article. That's an article in a specialist publication, which would generally be expected to give higher weight to media topics, and it's to a large extent a debate about whether it's even notable as a Friends episode, with one of the commentators calling it "lackluster", "totally forgettable", "minimally important", and "filler". You need to find a reliable independent source that indicates that the episode itself is notable beyond the context of the series, and explain in the introduction of the article why it's notable. --Slashme (talk) 06:03, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

text: Relevant policy: WP:NOTCATALOG, WP:PAGEDECIDE; relevant essay: WP:ROTM. --Slashme (talk) 06:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Orazio Torriani

message: ...that's fixed that pesky redlink! Please check now for copyright violations, before this article is mirrored at other sites. It will be very tiresome to have it threatened with removal when someone comes upon it elsewhere, months from now, eh: cf Talk:Arch_of_Titus, etc etc. --Wetman 11:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Communist Party of Malta

message: *Devlin mentions 1970 as the founding date of the party.
*Sultana  quotes 'Communist Party. Election Programme. 1979' Did the party contest those elections as well? Did they support MLP candidate? run as independents? --Soman 11:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two comments 
Talk:List of Melbourne High School alumni

message: on the section in the notes the student run magazine sentinel is used as a reference, due to the nature of the magazine, i don't believe that it can be taken seriously (it is well known for containing complete bs e.g. "school sells soul to satan: McDonnalds to replace canteen" or reporting that philosophy teacher Dr. Vine was gunned down as a result of rap rivalry). prehaps another sourse can be found to better understand Mr. Fox's relationship with the school  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.172.4.43 (talk) 03:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  referenceing sentinel as a sourse
Talk:Mo Twister

message: (Ian Is Lopez 11:30, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I have tried to clean this up and remove non-neutral language while maintaining the spirit of the original article.  Things that were clearly statements of opinion were revised to contain the statement of fact (or nature of the rumor) only.  Psinu 13:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 12/2 

message: Deleted extraneous irrelevant text from talk page.  Also, believe Good Times with Mo needs to be combined into here.  Good Times with Mo is poorly written and has substantial overlap.  See Wikipedia:Proposed_mergers, December, 2007.  Psinu 10:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Cleanup and Merge Proposal
Talk:Sonia Keys

message: Unfortunately she passed away recently: https://minorplanetcenter.net/mpec/K18/K18PA9.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.21.51.40 (talk) 11:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Updated. Orientls (talk) 15:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment
Talk:Sepilok Orangutan Rehabilitation Centre

message: 'The Kabili-Sepilok FR is a 4294 ha Class 6 FR (a "Virgin" Jungle Reserve of tropical rainforest), which is adjacent to the Sepilok FR which is is a Class 5 reserve  i.e. Mangrove forest of 1235 ha.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sepilok2007 (talk • contribs) 01:24, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Geological Survey of Victoria

message: Should this page be renamed to the Geological Survey of Victoria? As I understand it, it has been renamed back to its original name. At least, the Website for it is under Geological Survey of Victoria. https://earthresources.vic.gov.au/geology-exploration/geological-survey-victoria There is no indication that the name “GeoScience Victoria” is still in use.  Steepleman (t) 10:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have requested a move Steepleman (t) 02:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Non-contested move   (t · c) buidhe 02:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: GeoScience Victoria →  – Latest sources (government Web site) indicate the agency has been renamed back to the Geological Survey of Victoria. Vid. https://earthresources.vic.gov.au/geology-exploration/geological-survey-victoria Steepleman (t) 02:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 January 2021
Talk:Trans-Manhattan Expressway

message: It seems that the Trans-Manhattan Expy exists a lot further south than the article would indicate, or at least it used to be further south and then was moved without changing the signs. This morning I saw two signs reading "Trans-Manhattan Expressway" at Riverside Dr and 168th St. You can see one of them on Google Streets here and the other here. Someone should find out more about this, and work it into the article. --Keeves (talk) 12:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  168th Street and Riverside Drive 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Interstate 80 in New York. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 05:11, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Interstate 80 in New York" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Rosanna Roces

message: I saw the nomination for "neutrality," which I don't think applies to this article at all because there's not even enough information for anyone to be "non-neutral" about anything.  If any, what this article needs is more data (way more, really) than it currently has to make it a useful article. Janet78 (talk) 22:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality? 

message: Needs the Showtime controversy added 
Rosanna Roces breaks silence on 'Showtime' controversy 
ABS-CBN - Wednesday, January 13, 2010
MANILA, Philippines – Controversial actress Rosanna Roces was saddened that her remarks on “Showtime” resulted in the 20-day preventive suspension of the ABS-CBN talent show. The actress pointed out that the Kapamilya network took it upon itself to immediately address the issue even before the Movie and Television Review and Classification Board (MTRCB) could call its attention. Roces has been axed as one of "Showtime's" judges after taking potshots at school teachers during the program's January 7 episode. "Nagpapasalamat ako sa ABS-CBN dahil binigyan nila ako ng pagkakataong humingi ng paumanhin sa aking naging pahayag sa ‘Showtime.’ Naramdaman kong nakahanap ako ng tunay na kapamilya sa ABS-CBN dahil hindi nila ako iniwan sa ere. Kung sa ibang network, gaya ng naranasan ko noon, ay iniwan ako at pinabayaang magpaliwanag ng mag-isa," she said.
122.167.74.33 (talk) 07:28, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added this information to the draftspace of this article. Thank you. Jayjay2020 (talk) 04:46, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Showtime
Talk:Omphalotropis sp. nov. 2

message: According to the IUCN, this species name is invalid but no new name has been proposed.  They are using the name Omphalotropis sp. nov. 2 to describe this critter, since Omphalotropis costulata was a name given to another critter by Mousson, 1870.  Thoughts on how we should deal with it? --TeaDrinker (talk) 07:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: What you did is fine for the time being; we will see how this unfolds. Invertzoo (talk) 15:57, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalid name
Talk:Advanced traffic management system

message: I've just taken a basic stub entry for the american ATMS system and updated it with the UK system as well. It's pretty much my first article and I have tried to observe all the things I should. I've linked to official and unofficial sources for the information I have posted. I created this article as I was searching for it (looking for information) and found nothing on it. MatthewFP 11:54, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

message: Advanced traffic management system was incorrectly redirected to Active traffic management. These are completely different concepts and not equivalent. User:MichaelDarter 31 August 2010.  —Preceding undated comment added 01:48, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect redirects
Talk:National Review (London)

message: The article Reaction to Darwin's theory references "The review in the British Unitarian National Review". National Review (London) makes no reference to Unitarianism. Would it be logical to include some such reference? -- 201.19.11.75 12:03, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was a different National Review, published between 1855 and 1864, and edited by Walter Bagehot and Richard Holt Hutton. - Crosbiesmith 19:11, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I created National Review (1855), a particularly stubby stub, to avoid future confusion. - Crosbiesmith 19:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Review as Unitarian?
Talk:Aylesbury (disambiguation)

message: Reaction to Darwin's theory mentions an 1886 conversation between Darwin's friend Charles Kingsley and "Lady Aylesbury". I'm unable to find any Wikipedia article which seems an appropriate link for Lady Aylesbury. Can anyone help out with this? -- 201.19.11.75 12:27, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Try Marquess of Ailesbury.  Alternatively there is also a page, Reynold Heatherington, Lord Aylesbury, however no pages link to it, and the page Lord Aylesbury doesn't exist yet. -- Roleplayer 13:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  19th-century Lady Aylesbury
Talk:Seithennin

message: I don't see why these articles shouldn't be merged, as they clearly describe the same person under different spellings. Crunchysaviour 12:47, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Seithenyn is the standard form in Welsh (see Welsh wikipedia link from the other article). Enaidmawr 00:31, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Boomershoot

message: The link to the Newsweek Article has been removed. The previous link took you to a copy of the article displayed on the group's website, but when searching for the same article on Newsweek, a paid subscription is required to view it. References need to be freely available to all viewers, which Newsweek itself could not provide. The duplication of the article on the website seems to be a copyright violation, as the only way to view that site is with an account. There are still two other secondary sources, so this doesn't affect notability. Hersfold (talk/work) 13:07, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Newsweek Link
Talk:Restricted area

message: Why does this page redirect to a Metroid page? Ong elvin 13:09, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay... and now it redirects to a Basketball zone... Ong elvin 09:36, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And now I've edited the danged page to act as a disambiguation page. Ong elvin 09:42, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:António Luís Costa

message: I think that this article is written in a neutral way, saying only true facts, and without libelous content. But because the article names a person and serious criminal charges against him, just to be on the safe side I would like to have confirmation that everything is all right with the article. Jayme 13:13, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the comment. This case was one of the major Portuguese news this summer until now, maybe only second to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann. Jayme 21:55, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks for your comment. I added a section about the media coverage and a section about criticism related to the maximum penalty of 25 years in Portugal. Jayme 12:32, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Comment
Talk:NASA Paresev

message: The aircraft's correct name is Paresev (Parawing Research Vehicle) but a parallel and more detailed and referenced Wiki article was just created under the misspelled name Parasev; Its contents will be transferred and blended in here, the original article.  Paresev spelling checked, and redirected apropiately, as both spelling names Parasev and Paresev are in the internet. BatteryIncluded 13:21, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling Paresev & Parasev 
Talk:Conference Board Leading Economic Index

message: the early warning system link leads to an article for a term unrelated to its use in the article  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.114.177 (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: early warning system link should be removed

message: User:Rdavis1946 has been going around to several economic indicator articles adding external links to the "Consumer Metrics Institute", an organization I have never heard of before. The external links have been placed both in the body of articles and in the external links section of articles. Rdavis1946 originally had the username Cmii staff, which could easily refer to "Consumer Metrics Institute, Inc. staff". According to this site, "Richard Davis" is "President of the Consumer Metrics Institute". I think we have a serious conflict of interest here.
The Consumer Metrics Institute does not appear to be a notable organization. Instead, it appears to be a website with lots of cheaply-made MS Excel graphs.
Articles affected:
* Leading indicators
* Economic indicator
* Consumer Leading Indicators (Created by Rdavis1946/Cmii staff)
* Conference Board Leading Economic Index
History of Rdavis1946's edits can be found here. --JHP (talk) 04:22, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspected Consumer Metrics Institute linkspam
Talk:Panulena

message: WoRMS calls this genus Fanulena, not Panulena:
https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=818257
2601:441:4900:A6E0:D4BD:B30E:40E9:2323 (talk) 21:04, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a name change to Fanulena
Talk:Peninsular Malaysia

message: Can anyone point me at the difference between "Peninsula" and "Peninsular"? Thanks in advance. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:06, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello again. Peninsular is an adjective; Peninsula is a noun. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:02, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peninsular ?? 

message: According to the constitution of Malaysia the name Malaya is still officially in use. To quote: "". --Donald Trung (talk)  21:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a restoration of the wording of the 1963 constitution, when Malaya was in use as the name of the country. It is not in widespread use today. CMD (talk) 21:48, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  While it's no longer in widespread use today it does appear to still be officially used. I have never heard someone actually use the term "District of Columbia" to refer to Washington DC, but it is still its official name. --Donald Trung (talk)  21:53, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It was certainly used in 1963, but I'm not sure it's even used by officials today. Perhaps this may change going forward. CMD (talk) 22:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Former" name?
Talk:Harry the Hornet

message: The article has no external links and apparently lacks citations. I discovered this video of the mascot derby in which Harry the hornet won, would this be a suitable citation and would somebody care to place it in a relevant position within the article
http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/950000/video/_953444_mascot_vi.ram
it is also available in better quality on youtube
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=yCvYM35RSPk
(Ralph edwards 14:03, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 
Talk:Beli Manastir

message: Šećerana links to Serbian settlement! Disambiguation needed. --Koppany 14:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Disambiguated. The correct link is now Šećerana, Beli Manastir. Admiral Norton (talk) 21:19, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Crime & Punishment

message: Crime & Punishment (1993) is a 1993 TV crime drama that debuted on NBC's Must See TV.
Cast (Jon Tenney; Rachel Ticotin; Carmen Argenziano; María Celedonio; Lisa Darr)
Crew
*Daniel Sackheim ....  producer (1 episode, 1993) 
*Jeanne Byrd ....  associate producer (unknown episodes) 
*Michael Duggan ....  executive producer (unknown episodes) 
*Dick Wolf ....  executive producer 
*Maris Celedonio - Tanya
*James Sloyan - Investigator
Ratings
*Series Debut: 9.1 rating
*series high: 11.2 rating (School Ties)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.148.31.196 (talk) 07:01, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Crime & Punishment (1993)]]