Talk:The KLF discography

message: I think I have to throw in the towel when it comes to fighting for the images to remain here. I've tried, but if I continue I'm open to accusations of edit warring. I remain adamant that it's "fair", morally and legally, to use them here (and of course we all know that The KLF could care less) but I seem to be in a minority on this one. If anybody else wants to challenge the removal, it would seem that the fair use police live at Wikipedia:Fair use review. --kingboyk (talk) 22:02, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: 50 Cent discography was recently given Featured List status. It looks very dull to me because of the lack of images, but it has a lot of chart placing data and references. Overall, it's not hugely better than this article I think. Comments? --kingboyk (talk) 22:41, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Featured discography 

message: Objections from last Featured List candidacy:
*Presence of images (only the vociferous regulars complained about this, but as above I've conceded defeat)
*Formatting sucks once images are removed
*Not focussed on one topic:
**KLF Communications material has been moved (for now) to a section of The KLF (comments at Talk:The KLF please)
**The "additional communicators" material was in project space for a while but now lives at List of The KLF's creative associates
*Formatting of references. Matched The KLF, which of course is Featured, but it may be worth looking at current best practice as I know things have moved on a lot since I first started using the ref tag.
In addition, we (probably I as it's awfully quiet around here) need to give the article a copyedit and look for ideas and to see what the current standard is by examining some of the recent featured discogs. --kingboyk (talk) 12:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting this to Featured List standard 

message: BPI's website has details on all albums / singles that have been certified, and is the official source. Type in KLF, and the relevant information comes up - for example. LuciferMorgan (talk) 22:52, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: RIAA's searchable database indicates that the KLF have been awarded two gold discs - one for a single, the other for an album. LuciferMorgan (talk) 22:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Is this considered vital information and if so where am I gonna fit it in? --kingboyk (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Certifications

message: I'm not sure what to do with things like:
*The Black Room, an album started and not completed. Currently prose after the albums table.
*The White Room (film), a road movie not completed but which has been given at least one public screening
*The unreleased (and possibly unrecorded) Pure Trance singles, for which sleeves were pressed
*The "Deep Shit" comic and flexi-disc, which was announced but never released
Currently these things are omitted but in the way they're important parts of The KLF story so I'm guessing I'll have to put them into their own table. --kingboyk (talk) 16:40, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ugh. The problem is knowing when to stop. On the one hand, we have things like "Deep Shit Part 3" (a year later than the planned and aborted comic book and flexi disc of "Deep Shit Part 1"), 6 copies of which were actually pressed up (and MP3s circulate). But Lazlo also lists (albeit in another section) such projects as the "Pure Trance" album, which presumably never got close to release as some of the singles were never pressed up (possibly not even recorded). I don't know whether to consider this stuff out of bounds or not. I chose to exclude them when the article was first written so maybe I should stick to that editorial decision. Thoughts?  --kingboyk (talk) 18:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Decided to go with it, looking pretty good I think. --kingboyk (talk) 10:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I might have been wrong about The White Room getting a public screening. I thought it was shown at an NME Film Festival; although I've established that the NME did have a KLF screening I can't verify that this film was shown. All I can find a reference to is a private screening to potential investors. Therefore, I shall list it only in "Unreleased". --kingboyk (talk) 12:00, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned/announced and unreleased projects 

message: Include or not? Thought to be semi-official when first released; consensus now is I think "probable bootleg" (as opposed to "definitely a bootleg", which I've defined as clearly out of scope). Currently in the list but should it be? --kingboyk (talk) 19:41, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''[[Waiting for the Rights of Mu]]'' 

message: I don't have an adequate reliable source for The KLF's music videos, so I am omitting that section. There's a commented out placeholder within the article body; if at some point in the future a source becomes available I will add the information. --kingboyk (talk) 10:47, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music videos 

message: Pretty much done, if anybody would care to comment (or answer any of the points above, in particular re certifications/gold discs).
If not, I guess I'll have to send it to FLC and let them do their worst. --kingboyk (talk) 15:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretty much done 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on The KLF discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080111071100/http://www.klf.de/discography/ to http://www.klf.de/discography/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://rocknerd.org/article.pl?sid=03%2F06%2F18%2F0539252
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080111071100/http://www.klf.de/discography/ to http://www.klf.de/discography/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified