lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Novgorod Oblast

message: "and shipbuilding, which developed as a result of the Oblast's maritime location. "
But the oblast doesn't have a maritime location.  Skinsmoke (talk) 14:37, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It has a big lake, but I think it is safer to remove this sentence anyway.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:50, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shipbuilding 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Mkativerata (talk) 11:51, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Novokuznetsk

message: TastyPoutine, 
Why you deleted name of city in Shor language? You wrote "You’re looking to relitigate the discussion on Talk: Tomsk on this page" but Tomsk city is in other region of Russia unrelated to Kemerovo Oblast or Novokuznetsk.
(http://tili.tadarlar.ru/tadar/rus-shor.html От Мысков до Новокузнецка. Томазақтаң Аба-тура четтире)
Shor are native people in Novokuznetsk (and all Kemerovo Oblast). You can read about it on official web-site of Administration of the Kemerovo Oblast https://ako.ru/oblast/obshchaya-informatsiya/indigenous-population.php 
: According to this official site, there are only 2 indigenous peoples in the Kemerovo Kemerovo Oblast: the Shors and the Bachat Teleuts, which are sometimes referred to as the Shorts subethnos. Sebirkhan (talk) 21:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You are perfectly well aware of what I meant about relitigating the same discussion. Read what I wrote there. TastyPoutine talk (if you dare) 22:02, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

text: Can you give objective reasons why the name must not be present in Shor? I, in turn, provided the official website of the Oblast, I think it has at least some significance. Sebirkhan (talk) 00:45, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you read what I wrote? TastyPoutine talk (if you dare) 02:35, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

text: I beg you, do not depart from the topic. Did you have a reason to delete the name? Sebirkhan (talk) 02:56, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you read what I wrote on Talk:Tomsk? The same reasoning applies. TastyPoutine talk (if you dare) 03:56, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Shor langauge
Talk:Novoshakhtinsk

message: Novoshakhtinsk is in world news today as a UAV drone carrying an explosive charge hit the Novoshakhtinsk oil refinery causing an explosion and large fire.  Drone is attributed to Ukraine apparently making a strike 150 km behind the lines of conflict in the Russian invasion of Ukraine.  
Link to fascinating full video of the strike, reportedly from Russian mobile phone video, captured off of the internet by OSINT aggregators. link It is likely that article-worthy better media sources will be found within a few hours. 
Novoshakhtinsk is thus playing a role in the large scale war that has been going on for four months now.  Article would be improved by including the economic activity in Novoshakhtinsk more generally, and the refinery in particular. N2e (talk) 12:16, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oil refinery strike, in war following Russian invasion of Ukraine
Talk:Jerez-Xérès-Sherry y Manzanilla de Sanlúcar de Barrameda

message: See: es:Denominación de Origen Jerez-Xérès-Sherry at Spanish Wikipedia. WQUlrich (talk) 01:14, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 
Talk:Turkey men's national basketball team

message: depth chart should be below the list of staff corrected it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.176.18.103 (talk) 15:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depth Chart 
Talk:October Revolution Island

message: hello, i ended up on this page by chance and saw that the page was (imho) vandalized. it was the last edit that seemed like vandalism so I undid (?) it. There was anticommunist rant with no source citation whatsoever. check it out please. i hope i havent done anything wrong i normally dont edit wikipedia, but it was clear rubbish.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.96.24.129 (talk) 21:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  anticommunist ranting?
Talk:Olga, Russia

message: where was the balhae town exactly? how far was the balhae town from downtown olga? because saying there was a place near a place is not specific enough for me. although i enjoy how its trying to asert that a old settlement was located in the vicenity of olga. i just want a estimate on the actual distance.
69.221.172.106 (talk) 22:53, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Olyokminsk

message: The previous section (entirely unsourced) made several claims about Olyokminsk's climate, among them that it had recorded temperatures ranging from -66°C to 45°C, giving it the world's highest temperature range. However, I couldn't find any evidence whatsoever to support such a claim - according to this source going back to at least 1882 the records are -60.1°C and 37.7°C, which would not be as large a range as, for example, Verkhoyansk. As such I've been bold and completely rewritten the section to reflect the sources I've found. (There were also other problems, such as it claiming it is a Dfd climate when it's actually a Dfc, and that summers are "very hot" with "temperatures exceeding 40°C" - I can't find anything that would support either of those claims). Dendrite1 (talk) 08:21, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate section 
Talk:Om (river)

message: The article stated that the river "rises near the borders of Novosibirsk and Omsk Oblasts."
Looking at Google maps this is impossible on 2 grounds
a) The length of the river is stated at >700km but the border suggested is only about 120km from Omsk. Even with meanders a river could not be 6 times this distance.
b) I followed the river in Google Maps and it tracks, with the name Om attached, to the northeast of Novosibirsk Oblast near the border with Tomsk Oblast. This is about 500km from Omsk (in a straight line) so with meanders the river could be >700km long.
I have therefore updated the article to state it "rises near the borders of Novosibirsk and Tomsk Oblasts".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MWchat (talk • contribs) 10:22, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Opala (volcano)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20090409051102/http://volcano.si.edu/world/volcano.cfm?vnum=1000-08=. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Haihayas

message: Joy1963 18:00, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Per Wikipedia convention, I would like to change the title of this article from plural to singular. We don't have articles like "Americans" or "Chinese", but we do have America and China - advise if issues Parsh (talk) 04:02, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Plurals are used for collections of specific thing (WP:PLURAL); in this case the set of 5 clans. So, the plural here is appropriate.Klbrain (talk) 04:29, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Clarification: I now see that this is part of a merge proposal/discussion. So, the suggestion is to merge to Heheya Kingdom rather than retain a separate Haihayas page. I agree. Klbrain (talk) 11:10, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Oryol Oblast

message: The content in this article lacks coherence. For instance: ‘In the 16th century, the fortress town of Oryol was founded, restored destroyed in the 13th century, Livny. In the 16th and 17th centuries, the territory of modern Oryol was the borderland of the Tsardom of Russia, there are many on the strengthening of large defense line.’ 
How exactly is a town founded and then immediately ‘restored destroyed’? Why did we leap back in time, from the 16th century to the 13th? Who is this elusive ‘Livny’? Then we move along, somehow changing from past tense (‘was the borderland’) to present (‘there are many’) in the same sentence. The comma after ‘Russia’ and before ‘there’ in the second sentence mentioned should be a semicolon, for the words following make a complete sentence. I also believe either the word ‘strengthening’ or ‘large’ should be eliminated because the sentence is rather redundant with both, but I digress. What is a ‘strengthening of large defense line’? More importantly, what does the sentence mean by saying that the territory of modern Oryol was the borderland and that there are many on the defense line? Many territories? Borderlands? Surely not many modern Oryols? I could make a guess, but perhaps it would be best for the article itself to specify.
It seems probable that the person(s) who wrote it are not familiar with the English language, and for this I cannot blame them. If I were able to understand the information within the article, I would correct it in editing. Unfortunately it makes little to no sense. 
While I am noting this, I might as well mention that the page ‘Saratov Oblast’ could also use some changes in the ‘Prehistoric period’ section inside ‘History’.
Thank you for your time.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.163.34.72 (talk) 17:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content unclear
Talk:Ostrogozhsk

message: -When one picks and chooses information provided by an editor that fulfills an obvious agenda a third party (arbitrator) needs to be brought in.
Similary whilst removing information that has been sourced but that may not be in favour of one party, that is called politically motivated editing, it means prioristing an agenda over cited information, and is against Wikipedia guidelines.
If you have a legimitiate problem with the information provided (of which you haven't expressed) please do so, your history of edits indicates a strategic motive, as per wikipedia policies those users that remove information without justification consistely in favour of one party are liable to be banned.
Again, if you have a legitimate problem, and I stress legitimate, please explain. The information provided has been sources from a Harvard Published book, yet you retain "During the time of Stepan Razin's revolt against Aleksey Mikhailovich of Russia the city was under control of rebellious Cossacks." that has no citation, I wonder why?
Both our time could be used far more productively than an edit war, hence, though the information may not fulfill an agenda or mention another party, because it is cited and relevant to the article there really is no reason why it shouldnt be in the article.
RegardsDanielLerish (talk) 19:24, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unusual Editing 

message: Rybne, it means fishful. Юе Артеміс (talk) 06:27, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you include a source for this? Because it looks like an old name and not in current use. Maybe it is something instead for the history section or a name section. Mellk (talk) 10:34, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Ukrainian name
Talk:Mitsuko Shiga

message: When did she die, 1956 or 1976? Websites seem to have copied themselves by describing the date as 1956 but talking about her contributions in the 1950s and 1960s...
Also, if it is 1976, was she 90 or 91 at the time of death? Again conflicting information on this one too...
Macarism (talk) 20:09, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 
Talk:Pechory

message: Russia pulled out of border treaty with Estonia only because Estonia included more points in that treaty already after the treaty had been signed.The estonian acion is considered illegal because additions can only be made upon the agreement of both parties but Russia didn't give its agreement.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.148.18.129 (talk) 10:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, this explanation is totally wrong. Estonia did not add any additional points to the treaty. Russia pulled out of the treaty because it did not like the wording of the preamble to the Estonian ratification law. The ratification law makes no changes to the treaty, it merely formalises the treaty into the correct legal context within Estonian law. Martintg (talk) 11:41, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are wrong.This had nothing to do with estonian ratification law but with the declaration that estonian government attached TO the Treaty during the process of its ratification in estonian parliament.This declaration changes the meaning of the entire Treaty and makes possible legal claims of part of the territory of RF in the future.This declaration would become an undetachable part of the Treaty therefore Russians would have to consider it.In fact,they didn't like the new addition that was made antedate that was why they didn't ratify it. Frank Russian (talk) 11:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it was the pre-ample contained in the ratification law, which places the treaty into internal context of Estonian law. Nothing was attached to the treaty. This are the facts of the matter. Martintg (talk) 13:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:Pevek

message: I added a map to this article.
Someone has removed it.  But I don't see an explanation here as to why they removed it.
Granted, it is not the greatest map.  But this article needs a map.  I am going to wait a week, and then
re-add it.  Geo Swan (talk) 22:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There really is no need to wait for a week.  It looks that the map was removed by a new user; probably by accident.  I've just added it back.  Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:53, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  add map 

message: Is there any information on access to this town? Mwahcysl (talk) 19:51, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Access
Talk:Pikalyovo, Leningrad Oblast

message: Please add some relevant information. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7973084.stm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.100.215.30 (talk) 22:45, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009 Crisis 
Talk:Pitkyaranta

message: Many names in the Republic of Karelia are in Finnish, eg. Hiitola, Lahdenpohja, Louhi, Pitkäranta and Suojärvi. In Russian they have been transliterated to "Khiytola", "Lakhdenpokhya", "Loukhi", "Pitkyaranta" and "Suoyarvi".
Although the Finnish towns are Hämeenlinna, Jyväskylä, Äänekoski etc, in Russian Хямеэнлинна, Ювяскюля and Яянекоски, nobody insist that they have to be in English Khyameenlinna, Yuvyaskyulya and Yayanekoski.
--WPK (talk) 16:11, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move the page to '''Pitkäranta'''
Talk:Plesetsk

message: The little maps at the top appear to disagree about the size of the Oblast. 94.30.84.71 (talk) 17:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: For convenience, Novaya Zemlya and Franz Jospeh Land, where there are no settlements with permanent population, are not included to the locator map.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Maps 
Talk:Podolsk

message: The entry for Sukhum, Abkhazia keeps being changed by anonymous IPs based in Georgia. As Abkhazia is recognised as a state by the Russian Federation, it is appropriate to treat Abkhazia as a state in this article. It is not the imaginary Sukhumi or Sokhumi in Georgia that Podolsk has a twinning with, but the real Sukhum, capital of an independent Abkhazia, which hasn't been in Georgia since 1993. If these anonymous IPs don't like this being reverted, I suggest they stop being sneaky and have the courage to discuss the matter on the talk page.Bofoc Tagar (talk) 18:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Abkhazia is recognised as a state by the Russian Federation, but it's The English Wikipedia, not the Russian. –BruTe Talk 10:51, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In the case of a similar dispute relating to Kilmarnock the general consensus seemed to be that the way things were expressed by the parties responsible for the twinning was what counted. The official position of the Russian authorities would imply that the twinning is viewed in the context of Abkhazia being regarded as a sovereign state. Bofoc Tagar (talk) 22:52, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sister cities
Talk:Polyarny, Murmansk Oblast

message: Not sure if http://www.rospt.ru/adr_list.php?id=51&cod=000010 is reliable source.
Or pages on Russian Post office site.
Search page - http://www.russianpost.ru/PostOfficeFindInterface/default10.aspx
Polyarny results - http://www.russianpost.ru/PostOfficeFindInterface/FindOPSByPostOfficeID.aspx?index=184650
All pages in Russian
78.63.27.227 (talk) 20:06, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Postal code/ citation needed 

message: "2018 action thriller Hunter Killer, a 6.6/10 IMDB film" 
Really, is this the best description? Satyris410 (talk) 23:35, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A 6.6/10 IMDB film
Talk:Poshekhonye

message: Maybe this would be a useful source for some citations?
http://www.adm.yar.ru/english/section.aspx?section_id=161 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 121.45.227.4 (talk) 09:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible source 

message: Is there a sort of green cross of Burgundy on the local flag? What does it mean?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.142.175.22 (talk) 11:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The local flag 
Talk:Vincent Clarkson

message: When was it revealed that Vincent was one of Gwen's sorority sisters?  I don't recall that at all. — Spanish lullaby (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't remember that either -- Dougie WII (talk) 22:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  While this is an extremely late response, the above statement is not true. Aoba47 (talk) 15:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Buffy
Talk:Priozersky District

message: I have reverted this edit for the following reasons:
*The addition lists the same volosts as the (cited) passage immediately above, except that it links to the articles on administrative centers of those volosts.  Volosts and their administrative centers are not equivalent concepts.
*Finnish names are irrelevant here, because Finnish is not an official language of Leningrad Oblast.  Finnish names may go to the articles about volosts if and when such articles are created.
*Territories of modern volosts do not match territories of the old Finnish entities one-to-one.
*Terminology and description of the district's administrative structure are inconsistent and partially incorrect.
*Districts of Leningrad Oblast cannot have an official language other than that of the oblast (which is Russian).
*Other Wikipedia articles cannot be used as references.
*The edit removed , thus hiding properly referenced section.
—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:47, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert
Talk:Pskov Oblast

message: According to Eesti Entsyklopeedia 1938, there lived in 1920 1.500 Estonians around Porhov in 10
ethnically Estonian inhabited villages. What happened to them?
The total number of Estonians living in Soviet Russia, Pskov (Pihkva) Province was in 1920 13.200 of which 3.800 lived in Toropets (Toropa) Rajon, 3.100 in Holm Rajon.
JN
They moved to Estonia,I suppose.There was around 40% of Russian-speaking population in Estonia in 1989.Now they are just 25-30%.What happened to them?
Frank Russian (talk) 10:11, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pskov (Pihkva) Region Estonians
Talk:Puchezh-Katunki crater

message: I know it says this crater is not on the surface, but is it possible that the change in vegetation in what appears to be Europe's largest crater cna be seen in an aerial or satelite photo?
If not, can we have some kind of diagram, or at least map of this crater, please?
IceDragon64 (talk) 20:45, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture? Map?

message: Someone may want to apply crater template

--YakbutterT (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Crater Infobox?
Talk:Putorana Plateau

message: The dictionary of contemporary geographical names (on Russian language) writes that the word Putorana originates in Lake Putorana (now the Artificial Lake Khantaiskoye) and that this lake is also called Kutorana on Evenk language . I would suggest to rename this article to Putorana Mountains (or Putorana Plateau (or something similar), as plato does not directly indicate a mountain. --Hardscarf (talk) 22:04, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Raikoke

message: this NASA link - has a decent amount of info on the eruption reaching the stratosphere, but also a couple of gorgeous photos - wikicommons can usually use NASA pictures (I think?) so if someone does know how to get them can they sort that out. EdwardLane (talk) 07:30, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eruption 4:00 a.m. local time on June 22, 2019 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Raikoke Volcano Erupts (48132762546).jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for July 07, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-07-07. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Aviafanboi (talk) 14:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD 

message: Raikoke is said to be "16 kilometres (9.9 mi) distant from the island of Matua". Shore-to-shore, the two islands are 18.02 km (11.2 miles) apart, and centre-to-centre the distance is 23.77 km (14.77 miles). Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 23:29, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Zero (Spanish magazine)

message: I plan on adding additional information that I will be translating from the Spanish version of the article, and I will utilize sources from the Spanish article. I will add the history and contents of the magazine to the article. I would also like to add an image of a popular cover page of the magazine. 
Amandav05 (talk) 17:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing Article
Talk:Russky Island

message: This article is outdated. Now, the Russky island is much more developed with a new Far East University, hotels and infraestructure.--80.30.181.170 (talk) 02:02, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Outdated

message: I get that Moscow is the capital of Russia, but feels a bit weird in the Geography section to refer to the island's distance from Moscow. It's nowhere near it!!  Sportzak (talk) 14:08, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Moscow?