lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Neurotrophic factors

message: Hi, I'm part of a WikiEdu course, and I am hoping to add more information to this page. Specifically, I would like to start by adding different sub-group headings of each type of neurotrophic factor and then, within each sub-group, adding the functions of each neurotrophic factor.
OdessaG (talk) 12:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a good start as it seems like there are many neurotrophic factors that need to be accounted for in this article. I like that you included how they are grouped into different families. I would maybe expand on this and include why they are grouped this way and what qualifies each factor to belong to a certain group. Also just wanted to make sure all of these descriptions are paraphrased and not directly quoted. If quoted, I would try to find a conclusive way to describe each using research from the articles you found. It looks like you have a lot of good references too, I would try to link each one when citing to make it easier to find the reference you used instead of using in text citations. In your next draft I would try to put together more descriptions about each family and super family (like the TGF-beta), and characteristics of these! I would also maybe add something like a brief introduction of what a neurotrophic factor is and the general characteristics that they all have in common. -Gicoo001 (talk) 18:23, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

text: Your article looks great & very well organized. ProfJRL (talk) 17:04, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

text: Based upon a cursory read-through, the section that you wrote appears well written IMO. A minor style point to remember is that references should be placed after punctuation (e.g., periods).  A bot will eventually come around and correct instances where a reference is placed before a period in the event that you forget, but it may take a while. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 00:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding specific Neurotrophic factors
Talk:SK3

message: There is plenty of good material in this article, but it has two closely related issues that I have tagged. First, it is very technical. Naturally some of the material is inherently technical, but I think that more context could be provided. Also, there are far more research papers in the further reading than are appropriate for a Wikipedia article. If some sources were found that are not primary research literature, they could serve as a guide for writing it in a more accessible way. Good luck! RockMagnetist (talk) 06:27, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical and primary sources
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Cobi 2

message: Cobi appears to be doing amazing work with his bot- yet doesn't have a lot of interaction with users and mainspace wikipedia editing.
I have often wondered if we need a whole new type of wiki-assistant, who was not an admin but had a few of the abilities of admins for more cleaning up/tidying housecleaning work (which Cobi is already doing in abundance) and less user-interaction settling disputes work.
Cobi is doing oodles of good. Instead of making him an admin- with a whole range of powers, responsibilities, why not simply create a new type of wiki-assistant so we can support and empower Cobi (and I have seen others like him apply for admin) in doing the very needed and extremely helpful work they are already doing? 
For example, he can spot and block vandals.
Thoughts? Sethie (talk) 04:11, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Do we need a new type of admin?

message: Will has cast an Oppose ballot in the Support column. I moved the ballot to the Oppose column. Nick reverted my edit, citing good faith that Will knows what he is doing. I then posted on Nick's talk page a request for Will to clear this up. Kingturtle (talk) 14:38, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Clarified. Kingturtle (talk) 17:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

text: It's one extra user. It really won't matter much in the long run. Redrocketboy 14:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If (and I say if) the one extra user is a sock-puppet, then it matters. Kingturtle (talk) 14:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you should assume good faith. Cobi said the user is someone he knows. Redrocketboy 15:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I never said the word vote. And I chose my wording very carefully not to use the word vote. Kingturtle (talk) 15:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

text: You may have to forgive Kingturtle. He's a bureaucrat who recently came out of hibernation, and probably does not realise we work by a consensus these days. It says specifically on the RFA - this is not a ballot. Not looking at Kingturtle in particular, but this is an excellent reason bureaucrats should be reconfirmed. If KT is so out of touch in calling RFAs a ballot (not even a vote, but a ballot), then something is very wrong. Redrocketboy 15:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't speak for me. I can speak for myself. Thanks. Kingturtle (talk) 15:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ballot is the same thing. You did say ballot, and it says on the RFA page this is not a ballot. Redrocketboy 15:30, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes to bureaucrats
Talk:Vanilloid receptor

message: I'm a bit confused as to why this page is about vanilloid receptors and not vanilloid compounds themselves. I think TRPV covers the receptor story nicely, but surely there are other compounds in the family other than capsaicin? St3vo (talk) 18:11, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, there are 6 members of the TRPV family, not just TRPV1. St3vo (talk) 21:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Men's studies in the Caribbean

message: I have created this new page entitled "Men's Studies in the Caribbean" as a part of a class assignment for a history course I am taking in University.  This is my first experience with wikipedia so I hope my article is acceptable and look forward to any advice or critiques that might help my improve this article, or any others I may write in the future.  Thank you in advance for your imput.--Irishhistoryfan (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Irishhistoryfan, well done on writing this page.  I need to ask why this page have it's own article rather than a sub section in Men's studies?  If the field is still emerging it might be best to merge and redirect this page into Men's studies until the section becomes big enough for its own article.  What do you think?--Cailil  talk 18:35, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Cailil, thanks! I'm glad it is up to par.  I honestly wasn't sure which to put it under, especially given the fact that the men's studies article is shorter than this one I was writing.  However, I think you are right and merging the page might be a better idea.  I'll go read the corresponding help sections now on how to do this.  Thanks for your imput!--Irishhistoryfan (talk) 04:31, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done some work on this page, but it needs more.  Be careful of writing in "essay style" - synthesis is original research (or original argument) and Wikipedia is not the place for that (see WP:NOR)--Cailil  talk 21:43, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: page created

message: The issues I raised back in December '07 have not been addressed.  The page is still in essay style, I'm still unclear why this emerging field needs a whole article of its own (rather than a section in Men's studies) and most troubling it needs better attribution.  iF these issues cannot be addressed it will be summarized or shortened and merged to Men's studies--Cailil  talk 22:34, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues 

message: Ok 115.98.128.72 (talk) 05:07, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matrilocal family advantage
Talk:Kara Scott

message: ...cuz that's better than a complete "nobody", but seriously GSN you're killing the goldenegggoose here... 96.52.153.176 (talk) 14:37, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  is it true that SHE is "replacing" AJ Benza for High Stakes Poker? 

message: She's guilty.  Guilty of being hot!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.176.197 (talk) 07:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guilty 

message: I have never been in this position before.  I am a fan of this poker player. She tweeted (359/4178) and blogged (mincash) that she ITMed event 8.  WSOP.com belies that claim. Thus, she has cooked up her own controversy.  What am I to do?  I hate to do this, but I feel it is my obligation to present both sides for the reader to decide.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)  22:16, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 WSOP
Talk:Patriarchy in China

message: Whats going on here? Honestly, someone should rewrite this whole article or it should be deleted. A lot of things have no source and it sounds more like an opinion piece than anyting of value. (sorry for not signing)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.55.150.64 (talk) 09:30, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As somebody mentioned this here before it's an opinion piece not an article. It's probably written by a feminist with blue-dyed armpit hair.
66.130.114.98 (talk) 18:05, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete this or rewrite it !!!!! 

message: Hello I and a group of students plan on making some major edits to this article to give it some much needed revision and additions to help it have a better educational relevancy. In doing so I thought it may be useful for anyone who may stumble across the article during our editing phases to have an opinion or suggestion for possible edits thread, as well as a spot for myself or others to label changes that we plan to make:
As of right now these are the major edits that should be made in our eyes
:* Revision of biased opinionated tones to a neutral tone
:* Proper citing of information and quotation to references
:* Addition of missing information;
::* Gender Stereotypes
::* Modern/Old-Fashioned Women of China
::* Examples dating back further then just the 20th century
:* The addition of an introduction and definition of patriarchy (specifically its impact in chinese culture)
:* Removing any unnecessary information and adjusting the flow of certain subcategories of the article to read easier.
Please feel free to add to this list any other edits that should be made or suggestions for improvement. NatalieCampbell (talk) 20:12, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed portion with quote of athens as it does not seem relevant to chinese patriarchy as well as had no citation paired with it. Here is the section in case someone disagrees and thinks it should be added back; "Another one of these famous quotes is also related to the patriarchy found in Athens. "Men are free to roam outside, but women must stay inside." [citation needed]" This is my signature NatalieCampbell (talk) 06:42, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Edits 

message: I suggest moving this article to Patriarchy in China, since that's the title that a reader would expect based on the titles of other articles which follow the format '[topic] in [country]' like Gender inequality in China. It's also arguably more neutral phrasing since it clearly delineates topic and country, rather than mushing them together into an inseparable compound. – Scyrme (talk) 23:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Since no objections were raised in over a week, I went ahead and moved the article. – Scyrme (talk) 18:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest move to [[Patriarchy in China]] (Implemented) 

message: — Assignment last updated by Finndb (talk) 22:57, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Gender and Marriage in Chinese Popular Media
Talk:Veveo

message: I work for Veveo. The Veveo article is very outdated with regards to what Veveo is currently doing. In my opinion, an update to this article is needed based on some or more of the following links (most links below are third party links) as well as, if appropriate, comments from people using Veveo's vtap service:
* Veveo links
Veveo Corporate page
 vTap.com
Links to some news articles on Veveo
* Some third party articles (a sample)
 Rafe Needleman article
 BRIAN BERGSTEIN (AP) article
 Robert Scoble
 Matt Marshall article
 iPhone Atlas article
  From Contentinople
 One more from Robert Scoble
 Pinstack.com article on vtap on Blackberry
 Article from Daily IPTV
* Search links for user discussions on vtap (you'd have to sift through the links returned by these Google searches)
Google Search for 'vtap forum'
 Google Search for 'vtap discussion'
 Google Search for 'vtap Nokia'
* Youtube Videos about vTap
 Search 'vtap' in youtube
 vTap vs Youtube on the phone
 vTap on Nokia
221.135.191.222 (talk) 05:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Grundle

message: Right now this page redirects to a slang term.
However, "Grundle" is also the name of a character in a video game. Please see Adventure (Atari 2600).
Since I am not an administrator, I can't edit the "Grundle" page. Would an editor please edit it so it mentions this video game? Thank you! Grundle2600 (talk) 05:15, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: There is another "grundle"
Talk:Chinese pre-wedding customs

message: This article should not be merged into Southern Chinese wedding. Personal experience with these largely undocumented rituals and consequential discussions with friends shows these traditions, while intensely practiced by Southern Chinese, have spread to many other parts of China. Bride price is especially beloved across all China and has taken on a new and enhanced role in wedding traditions throughout, especially as public flaunting of cash is increasingly coveted as another way of flaunting the family name. Richardc020 (talk) 19:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 

message: It would be worth checking if this is applicable to all regions of China (I am rather confident that it’s not). From the transliterations it seems that these are mostly Cantonese customs. 
More specifically, I would also consider mentioning that these are Han Chinese customs that don’t necessarily apply to other minority ethnicities of China
I am happy to proceed with making amendments to the article, but don’t have the bandwidth to carry all this out by myself.
Doublestuff (talk) 10:25, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regionalism
Talk:Four Happiness Boys

message: I started to improve the article but found myself working too much with Google Translated web pages. I have to question the title, though. It seems "Sixi wawa" is the more common Anglicized name for them, but the name is actually -- as far as I can tell -- 四喜娃娃 (link to zh Wikipedia article). I'll leave it to someone with better knowledge of the language, though. --Rhododendrites (talk) 18:46, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Title, improvements
Talk:Suzuki Shin'ichi II

message: I don't think Gunma-ken even existed until 1871 (or Gunma-gun since a little later), so perhaps Suzuki was born in "what is now [blah blah blah]". It's a small and perhaps a trivial point, but pretty easy for Bennett and others to have got right: it makes me wonder how scrupulous they are in more important matters. -- Hoary (talk) 23:51, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, right. The Gunma-gun reference was bothering me, but I couldn't think why... Bennett seems very trustworthy, and it was Isawa writing in 1896 that mentioned Gunma-gun ("Gummagun", actually), presumably not feeling the need to provide the only recently supplanted former name; Bennett reproduces Isawa's text as a facsimile/scan in Old Japan Photographs - so there is no update or alteration. I'll reword the note per your suggestion. Pinkville (talk) 00:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Placename of birth

message: * "In 1876 Okamoto, now Suzuki, left Shimooka's studio, perhaps to work in a photographic studio in Nagoya, and then under Yokoyama Matsusaburō,<-ref>Nagoya and Yokoyama: as stated in Nihon no shashinka. This information does not appear in other sources that are in other ways more informative on Suzuki than the short article in Nihon no shashinka (which for example does not give even an approximate year of birth or death).<-/ref>"
In fact, Isawa and Bennett say that in 1876 Okamoto started his own studio in Nagoya - no mention of Yokoyama. I wasn't sure whether to alter the existing text and add this or not, so I took the easy path... (and see the CCA authority on Yokoyama, which contains much of what is known about Yokoyama, without mention of Nagoya...) Pinkville (talk) 01:18, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nagoya
Talk:1947 Pulitzer Prize

message: It has been commonly believed that the woman in the photo leapt to her death.  However, a book about the fire, "The Winecoff Fire" by Sam Heys and Allen Goodwin, identified the woman as a survivor named Daisy McCumber.
Epolk (talk) 05:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arnold Hardy photo 
Talk:Historic Avenue Cultural Center

message: Began article with referenced info, infobox, classing as a stub.  Altairisfartalk 05:32, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created article

message: Wikipedians - I don't know how to do all this, but the building has been renamed/repurposed and this page should be retitled.  I've added information about the change and included several news links, but I'm sure I didn't do this right. I know that Alabama Contemporary Arts Center has information about the change on its webpage and Mobile County Commission should soon have a page up about the building for further linking.   It's going to take a while to get all the places this building is referenced changed online,  12slb345 (talk) 14:11, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Building renamed/repurposed - needs editing to update, including title of page
Talk:K.J. Noons

message: Removed this section: "Noons is currently ranked #27 in the nation and #154 in the world as a middleweight in boxing by BoxRec."
*http://boxrec.com/ratings.php?sex=M&division=Middleweight&country=US&pageID=2
*http://boxrec.com/ratings.php?sex=M&division=Middleweight&pageID=7
When you click the links you can see Noons is not ranked in either of the spots mentioned. In fact, Noons isn't ranked at all in ANY weight class in Boxing.  76.14.67.159 (talk) 23:47, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Boxing Rank 
Talk:The Webb Schools

message: This article starts out talking about the CA schools and then, towards the bottom, brings up the TN school and gives an external link to that school.  It needs much better organization, as possibly a disambiguation of some sort.  --Bobak 15:39, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up tag: 

message: This article reads like a promotional brochure and needs to be re-written in a WP:NPOV.  Until such changes are made, this article violates Wikipedia's official policy of a neutral point of view.  RPrinter 23:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. -Will Beback · † · 20:01, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I also agree. -Torker · † · 14:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone and content violate Wikipedia's policy of neutrality 

message: Carabl, whoever you are: I don't know what your beef is, but I can personally attest that John Scalzi, the writer, did indeed attend Webb. I knew him there personally during my time there. John was a freshman while I was a senior, in 1983-84, and graduated in 1987, subsequently attending the University of Chicago. I am also quite certain about Admiral Watkins. If you don't like the schools, that is your privilege, but facts are facts. Bamjd3d (talk) 20:24, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flatly untrue 

message: Should this be cleaned up to only include alumni that are notable?
:That's correct. I've removed the entries without articles.   Will Beback  talk   05:20, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni
Talk:Red Ryder BB Gun

message: The statement, "...able to break skin but unable to kill any birds besides small sparrows and hummingbirds" is not at all realistic.  On a dare, I was able to kill a Blue Jay sitting on a fence in my back yard.  The Blue Jay was on one side of my yard, and my friend and I were on the other side of my yard (using the opposing fence as a way to steady my aim.  I would say the distance between gun and bird was at least 30 yards.  I aimed about 3 feet ABOVE the bird to intentionally MISS the bird, but gravity pulled the BB down and I hit the bird square in the chest.  The Blue Jay didn't squak, flutter, or anything -- it literally just fell about four feet to the ground with a dead "thud".  I've always felt very guilty about it, and have never forgotten it.  That was 31 years ago.
Please remove the statement, "...able to break skin but unable to kill any birds besides small sparrows and hummingbirds", as it is inaccurate.
70.169.212.130 (talk) 22:36, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unable to kill any birds besides small sparrows and hummingbirds. 

message: The article states:
"The movie's fictional BB gun, described as the "Red Ryder carbine-action, two hundred shot Range Model air rifle with a compass in the stock and a thing which tells time", does not correspond to any production model in existence nor even a prototype; the Red Ryder featured in the movie was specially made to match author Jean Shepherd's story (which may be artistic license, but was the configuration Shepard claimed to remember)."
This information is incorrect. A friend of mine has a model 1938B version of this Daisy BB rifle which not only has the compass but the sundial to boot. I took detailed photos to prove it. I'd be happy to supply the photos for the page but honestly, the hoops required to learn the ins and outs of editing a wiki page is way beyond the effort I want to put into correcting this error.
Is there anyone out there that I could send these pix to that would be willing to post these photos and change the article?
If so contact me at housetopranch AT hotmail.com
The only reason I bothered at all is because I cited this page's information during a radio broadcast prior to seeing the gun owned by my friend. Now I feel a bit silly for taking this info at face value.
208.100.141.212 (talk) 05:19, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daisy DID produce a Red Ryder BB Gun with a compass in the stock 

message: Do they sell these in the UK?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.13.16.24 (talk) 17:12, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK? 

message: Merge discussion is here. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 21:25, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:New York Interschool

message: I will this moment expand the article. People need to know about the eight coming together private schools for personal interest and their own knowledge about Interschool's programs.
I will expand this article now. Randyharrisonfan (talk) 06:13, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't forget to add some references. If the school is notable for you to be able to cite references from third party sources then you will most likely save the article. Sting_au  Talk 07:36, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment