lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Ameriphobia

message: *Keep This article was deleted purely for political reasons, ie. the Leftwing bias of many of the editors. I would hope they could put their political preferences aside (notice the strange emtional insistence on "strong delete") and actually allow NPOV balance. Deleting this page is like deleting Pro-Choice but allowing Pro-Life simply because of supposed Google results. Google actually shows that variants of the term have more results:
* 169 for Ameriphobia,
* 112 for Ameriphobic,
* 208 for Americanophobia,
* 333 for Americanophobe,
* 58 for Americanophobic,
* 914 for Americanphobia
I have moved the above here because it was originally put on the vote page after it was closed and the article deleted.  The author was User:Monitta (User:217.184.88.157).
--Tony Sidaway|Talk 11:18, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Vote, June 2005
Talk:Puerta de Alcalá

message: I have translated the article from the Spanish Wikipedia. If you see any errors in my grammar or typos, I urge you to kindly help me improve my English by correcting the article :) Sarg 11:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "In July 30, 1854 after having been defeated at Vicálvaro (Madrid), the Count of Villahermosa came into Madrid with a parade wielding as a trophy the spear of an enemy soldier. Madrilenos sarcastically nicknamed him “Longinos” for this ostentation (like the Roman soldier, Longinus, whose spear is said to have pierced Christ's side)."  I'm confused as to what this has to do with the Puerta de Alcalá.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.58.205.56 (talk) 01:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Passing through the gate, perhaps? If so should be stated.- phi (talk) 08:28, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Count of Villahermosa
Talk:LMS diesel shunters

message: This article needs to be split so that there is better flow in the text and then each class should get its own page including tech details.  It works better like that. Dunc|☺ 12:02, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: May I suggest using new names such as LMS diesel shunter 1831 rather than just LMS 1831 as the latter isn't very informative. Our Phellap 12:34, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: I have split off the main articles, as suggested above. Biscuittin (talk) 18:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article split
Talk:Usiaslau of Polatsk

message: A request to all! Please stop moving articles around arguing in edit summaries! Discuss the arguments from both sides first! For now, leave an article in its original location "Vseslav" and conduct all discussions at Talk:Vseslav of Polotsk. Whoever moved article first without discussion and a vote, broke the WP consensus spirit. Whoever is moving it back and forth by cut'n'paste or revert destroys the history of the page. Please everyone, STOP! If one side doesn't want to discuss and wants to instist on moving as article, use a WP:RP listing for that! --Irpen 19:43, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am ready to discussion, and I hope we will reach a consensus based on rational arguments. V1adis1av 20:58, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Great! Let's use the other talk page , where the article is right now, for any discussions. I will keep an eye for the article to remain at Vladislav, at least for now, until some consensus emerges. --Irpen 21:01, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK V1adis1av 21:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: please stop moving articles around! Discuss!
Talk:Comparison of operating systems (security)

message: From WP:RfD:
* Comparison of operating systems (security), Comparison of operating systems security → Comparison of operating systems These have been merged a while ago, the redirects are no longer useful. There are no links to the redirects left, what little pre-merge talk there was has been archived. --K. Sperling 11:44, August 11, 2005 (UTC)
**Delete ≈ jossi ≈ 05:37, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
**Keep, significant history at Comparison of operating systems (security).  dbenbenn | talk 00:54, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless you suggest a merging candidate, we can't exactly figure out what you want. Could you be more specific? JFW | T@lk 12:59, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it will be very hard to find some other page to merge, because this table is quite unicate and well arranged. Other similar comparison or list of operating systems contains a lot of more items (operating systems) than SecurityFocus or Secunia provide on this topic. In future we can add other systems here, or any other information related to this topic (number or examples of real exploits, viruses or so that take advantage of vulnerabilities). --Ptomes 17:51, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: This page should be merged with Comparison of operating systems and Comparison of Linux distributions, in a separate section in each page. Those OSes for which we don't have information now can simply be left blank. « alerante ✆ ✉ » 18:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

text: Since we're keeping this, no need to archive it. Noel (talk) 01:33, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement

message: The term “illegal immigrant” is offensive and used repeatedly in this article. Please change to a more neutral term like “undocumented immigrant” or “undocumented noncitizen”. 98.113.6.24 (talk) 01:21, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: its just a term, it's not being used pejoratively. Also, WP is  not censored or a place to right great wrongs. - wolf 03:03, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2021 

message: Change "him or her" to "them" for gender neutrality. 93.139.166.51 (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 August 2021 

message: This articles section on sanctuary cities reads like an op-ed it needs editing 2600:1700:2C90:C720:F8CF:FEF6:AA8C:F29D (talk) 21:56, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanctuary cities 

message: Is this really relevant to the larger page regarding Immigration and Customs Enforcement? I could see it as an appropriate addition to the linked page on sanctuary cities, but don't see how it's pertinent to Immigrations and Customs Enforcement directly, as the agency did not have any direct involvement in any of the criminal cases.
I propose that items regarding Ronil Singh, Tara O'Sullivan, Kate Steinle, Riley Jarecki, and the Sacramento County Sheriff Deputies be moved to the sanctuary cities page and removed from this one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dranomartini (talk • contribs) 06:30, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crimes committed by illegal immigrants under sanctuary cities heading 

message: — Assignment last updated by Kdavis25 (talk) 18:49, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: LIBR 1 Working with Sources

message: Mahmoud DEHGHAninche this is his complete last name he is waiting for an interview from one of our embassies or consulate his file is made up and fake he never graduated from any university in Iran or anywhere else he wants to enter this country under false pretenses. Can his name be sent to all embassies and consulate so by some mistake he gets student visa?this man hasn’t even finished high school how can he have made up files from some university in Iran which he never attended to would he be permitted visa? 75.130.252.225 (talk) 23:39, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fradulant F1 and F2 

message: What is the difference between a "Project" and an Operation.  ICE seems to have "Operations" such as the Operation Community Shield, and "Projects" such as Project Southern Tempest
There are categories dedicated to ICE operations, that includes the Project's but none of the operations pages or project pages include any information to help understand the distinction.  I think we might include that on the operation and project pages, or one of the parent pages.
(Also, I was unable to find a publication on the naming schema for projects or operations) eximo (talk) 04:28, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICE operations vs. Projects
Talk:Rohana Wijeweera

message: Parts of this article read like it was written by a novelist or newspaper article writer. It would help to have references for all the quotations and other statements of fact.   Regards, Mattisse 02:13, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Informal style of much of article is not encyclopedic 

message: "When this country was under siege by the southern terrorists – the JVP — as it engaged in abductions, beheadings, armed robbery, attacks on police stations and killing of armed forces personnel and deprived thousands of young persons of a proper university education, was there dancing on the streets and hoisting of the national flag when the JVP was defeated?" http://www.themorningleader.lk/20090107/politics.html
--Natkeeran (talk) 19:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sri Lankan Government considers him terrorist 

message: Anybody? Children of the dragon (talk) 21:44, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did this guy die? 

message: While the content is interesting, would it not be better to house such information in an article about his father, rather than having so much information on his father located in Wijeweera's page itself. I can see how his father's activities has relevance here, as it would have affected Wijeweera's views and activities, but it's in the wrong place. KJS0ne (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we need the mini-bio on the life of his Father on this page?
Talk:List of members of the Commonwealth of Nations by continent

message: Isn't Mannin member of the Commonwealth? Everton 13:03, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  All of the members of the Commonwealth are independent nations.  None of the Crown dependencies, such as the Isle of Man, nor the British overseas territories, such as Bermuda, is a member of the Commonwealth separately from the UK. -- ALoan (Talk) 30 June 2005 12:38 (UTC)
Shouldn't Cyprus be listed among the European countries? Quote from the article of Cyprus: "Cyprus is geographically in Western Asia (or the Near East), though politically and culturally it is considered as being in Europe.", and it is now a member of the EU. Nerio 11:27, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

text: There has been some limited discussion of Angola joining, but it isn't a member.  To date, Mozambique is the only member never to have been a part of the British Empire.  At the 1997 Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM), it was decided that no others member would be admitted unless they had past constitutional links to the United Kingdom.  Thus, since Angola does not, it is unlikely to gain Commonwealth membership any time soon (the same applies to Rwanda, Eritrea, East Timor, and Cambodia). Bastin 09:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/These are not the droids you are looking for

message: "Besides, we shouldn't have articles, the titles of which end with a dangling preposition."
Indeed, that is something up with which we will not put.  But I was wondering if the same dramatic effect could have been gained if Obi-Wan had said: "These are not the droids for which you are looking."  I guess Lucas could have written it as: "These are not the droids you seek." –DeweyQ 13:03, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: After which, one Imperial trooper turns to the other and says, "Well, then, I suppose off we should just fuck". Gzuckier 16:05, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Milan Mandarić

message: Is the spelling "Milan Mandaric" right?  Isn't it "Milan Mandarić"?  Everton 13:12, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks to me like in all English sources untainted by Wikipedia, this man's name  is "Milan Mandaric" or less often "Milan Mandarich". So why has this American, notable only for activities after he came to the U.S., who is also known for his investments in soccer clubs in the UK, had his article name moved to a spelling not used in English?  Gene Nygaard (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Brave Saint Saturn

message: Any evidence on the BSS / Colin Kapp connection? Jpers36 13:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act

message: HIPAA was updated by the HITECH act, GINA and minorly by the 21st century cures act.
I would like to add this information to the legislative history for the law, unless others have an issue with this.
Ftrotter (talk) 18:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Is the information included within the violations up to date with current violation penalty amounts?Kfsimerau (talk) 03:14, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing legislative updates 

message: related topic needs understanding: Internet_fax#HIPAA-compliant_internet_fax_service
2601:646:200:43F0:B503:1BFB:4E74:B8BB (talk) 04:21, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  HIPAA-compliant_internet_fax_service 

message: This edit by User:Scribbie adds an advertisement template to this article. I don't understand the justification for the edit, which is summarized in edit history as "Something gives me the vibe that this article is written like an advertisement." In order to improve the article, I'm asking for some guidance about what specifically needs to be improved rather than just a "vibe." A number of editors (such as, recently, User:Kuru) have put effort into eliminating advertisement-based sources. However, reading the article now, most statements are factual and supported by legitimate sources (and, granted plenty of cn tags). So I'm at a loss as to why the advertisement template would apply here, or what would need to be changed to justify removing it. Clarification would be appreciated, and absent any clarification I will WP:BEBOLD and remove it. DoubleRelevance (talk) 03:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Remove it. I'm not sure why it was placed. That editor never met here to discuss perceived issues, nor did they explain their reasoning in their edit summary when they placed the template. Article seems just fine. Cleter (talk) 16:23, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of advertisement template
Talk:Religious Satanism

message: Please do not redirect this article to the article Satanism.  There are other forms of Satanism out there that have their own articles.  Since I don't know much about this type of Satanism, please expand this article.
Thank you.
--Admiral Roo 13:22, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
(Comment edited for spelling and capitalization Andjam 04:41, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: this sounds like what i've heard referred to as "naturalist satanism". Gringo300 06:38, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't Redirect 

message: I suggest we merge this article with the Traditional satanism article.--– sampi (talk•contrib) 06:26, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: i suggest a cleanup of this page. the article on Satanism also contains info on the different forms of religious satanism, some of it is more detailed. borp 14:16, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup
Talk:List of Dutch noble families

message: Ik heb bij de hoge raad het oorspronkelijke document gezien. Daar staat van Ranzow. L van der Plas.
De Nederlandse graven heten VAN Ranzow, volgens de opname in de Nederlandse adel, maar gebruiken "von"
Bovenstaande is volgens mij niet juist. Het is gewoon Von Ranzow waarbij de naam graaf of gravin integraal onderdeel is van de achternaam. Men heeft dus niet de keus zonder titel door het leven te kunnen gaan.
* I suspect "van Liempt" is not accurate based on VFD proceedings. Ben-w 22:24, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Gentlemen, wonder as to why there are there no longer any Dutch dukes.--Anglius 02:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I appreciate yor explanation, Herr von Hebel.--Anglius 00:29, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I also would like to inquire as to whether Dutch titles are usually agnatic or cognatic.--Anglius 21:50, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I can't see why they are dutch princes as the link given doesn't explain this.
:The current Duke of Parma, Carlos Hugo de Bourbon-Parme was married to the Dutch Princess Irene, a sister of Queen Beatrix. Their children were made a part of the Dutch nobility and received the title "Prince/Princess de Bourbon-Parme". Freako 22:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What about Queen Beatrix? She is Marquess of Veere and of Vlissing/Flushing. Freako 22:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dukes of Palma | Earl of Clancarty 

message: I would like to suggest that the style used on this page be changed so that the tussenvoegsels are, in the English style, not capitalised. The Dutch style used here (i.e. capitalisation of tussenvoegsels) is surely going to lead to people misunderstanding the capitalisation of the surnames used here. Also, the capitalisation of surnames differs in the Netherlands from Belgium. The capitalisation used in a surname should be that actually used. Alternatively, an explanation (similar to that found on the article on "Dutch name") should be added. Schildewaert (talk) 06:20, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalisation of Tussenvoegsels 

message: What's the use of the "Foreign nobility" section? If it's noble, it should be listed above, and if it's foreign, it shouldn't be in this list. Mvdleeuw (talk) 22:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foreign nobility 

message: I do not see the Lewe family in this listing (Middelstum, Aduard, Nijenstijn...). Is there a reason?
Lewe is baron/jonkheer.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.229.244.118 (talk) 23:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch noble families 

message: This list in English I see for the first time. Unfortunately it contains lots of mistakes, is far from complete and should not at all be trusted. Paul Brussel (talk) 08:45, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI: for a complete list, based on the most reliable sources, you can find this list on the Dutch wikipedia. Paul Brussel (talk) 17:15, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  To be mistrusted
Talk:Henricus

message: See Henricopolis for duplicate article. What to do? MPS 14:00, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Page has now been merged into this one. (Unofficially; but I doubt anybody minded.) Please see that page's edit history for the genesis of some contents now incorporated here. Doops |  talk 05:05, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Thank you for declining to perpetuate the myth that the college proposed for Henricus is somehow related to William & Mary or represents its true beginning.  There does not seem to be any evidence that the proposed college even operated (http://richmondthenandnow.com/Newspaper-Articles/Henricopolis.html), let alone that the existence of the proposal makes W&M older than Harvard, as W&M's website has suggested.
--Editing 16:02, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No relation to William & Mary 

message: The actual location of Henricus is unknown. The article says it was found in the 1990's. Henricus Historical Park was founded during this time period, but not at the actual site. ---- Brandon  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.125.208.48 (talk) 13:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you sure about that?  I thought everyone today agreed that the archaeology there (Farrar's Island) has proved it is indeed the original site. Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 14:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual location of Henricus is unknown - article is incorrect
Talk:Woodworth, North Dakota

message: A "city" with a total population of "8o" people?... must be a joke. Alexander 007 14:22, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The U.S.A. appears to have a more flexible definition of the word 'City' than us mere Europeans are used to. Any settlement with more than a handful of people can claim to be one, whereas here the title has to be conferred by government. David | Talk 14:26, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: City?
Talk:Comparison of web browsers (security)

message: From WP:RfD:
* Comparison of Web browsers security, Comparison of web browsers security, and Comparison of web browsers (security) -- article already merged to comparison of web browsers. No important references to these redirects. --minghong 02:50, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I proposed a merge with Comparison of web browsers in the VFD discussion.  I'm happy to actually do the merge if that is the consensus. Uncle G 2005-07-02 02:48:15 (UTC)
* I agree with a merge. - McCart42 (talk) 02:47, 28 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the merge is complete. The Vulnerabilities section of the Comparison of web browsers page has all the information this article has, with additional data from another source, more browsers, and more up-to-date information. -- Schapel 14:26, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Kaplan–Yorke map

message: The right-hand side depends only on a constant α, but the text says that the function depends on two constants, viz. a and b. Furthermore, what is the domain of the mapping (I suppose x ∈ [0,1) and y ∈ R)? -- Jitse Niesen 14:47, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed the article, sorry about that. The article I read did not say what the domain of the mapping is. PAR 15:27, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notation
Talk:Summer Scent

message: I have taken the above claims to consideration and marked the article for its neutrality dispute. While a bit of non-neutrality was removed from the article from a recent edit, I still feel a bit of that "fangirl" like quality (quoting from above) when I read it. Below I shall list a few points that one should consider.
* The first paragraph lets a slight slip of a little bit of an opinion about the actors. While not too serious, it is still capable of being toned down.
* Opinions about the drama are shown in the last paragraph.
I also feel a lack of formality in the article, but I'm not entirely sure. Can someone check this? Bakazuki
: I see the lack of formality; it is straight from a review site online, actually. I'm going to be bold and work around with it. Hurrah 15:42, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV Dispute and Possible Formality Dispute

message: In the article, the actor Kim Yong-gun is incorrectly credited as Min-woo's father.  He actually plays Jung-jae's father. 68.61.95.119 (talk) 01:56, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kim Yong-gun as Jung-jae's father
Talk:Guerrilla marketing

message: Part of this article states that the population is split 45/45/10 between being left-brained, right-brained, and balanced. However, according to this article, the left-brain/right-brain distinction is bogus. https://www.britannica.com/story/are-there-really-right-brained-and-left-brained-people Besenj (talk) 11:27, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left & Right Brained? 

message: The section titled “online guerrilla marketing” is written in a familiar tone rather than impersonal 2600:1009:B118:E98E:89D9:D6A4:F287:198E (talk) 02:28, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor wording