lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Amphitrite

message: Moved from article: 
:(from an old encyclopedia)
--Menchi 03:44, Aug 27, 2003 (UTC)
::The article has developed far beyond that. --Wetman 22:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Can anyone check the reference in Der Neue Pauly 4/5 (Stuttgart/Weimar : Metzler, 1998) under "Halosydne" and work it into the article? 
I thought we probably shouldn't include
:At Naxos, Poseidon was blue;
:Then a nereid came into view. 
:When he spied Amphitrite. 
:In naught but a nightie, 
:He gave her an ocean or two. --Wetman 22:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Halosydne''

message: The opening paragraph states:
"In ancient Greek mythology, Amphitrite (not to be confused with Aphrodite) was a sea-goddess. Under the influence of the Olympian pantheon, she became merely the consort of Poseidon, and was further diminished by poets to a symbolic representation of the sea."
This whole paragraph should all be removed, it's just stupid.
Firstly: why would we need to be told not to confuse Amphitrite with Aphrodite.
Secondly: she became "merely" the consort of Poseidon. How in any way does the word merely apply to the status of being the wife of the king of the sea? Poseidon is one of the three rulers of the universe, only Zeus has more power than him. In fact she did rather well out of the rule of the Olympians, She became queen of the sea. That's a promotion, not a demotion.
Thirdly: Poets did use her as a "symbolic representation of the sea" but how in any way is this causing her to become "further diminished". Being the personification of the sea is an important job in any pantheon of gods, so why claim that it diminished her?
Going from Oceanid to queen of the sea to personificaton of the sea sounds like she was being anything but diminished.
The Prime Source 12:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it more emphatic and clearer now? The Jane Ellen Harrison quote is quite apt. --Wetman 15:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The opening paragraph is all wrong. 

message: Why and how would anyone mistake Ampithrite with Aphrodite? It's like mistaking Obama for Putin.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkruijff (talk • contribs) 12:00, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Amphitrite, not to be confused with Aphrodite?

message: What was the goddess of sea last words 181.199.249.170 (talk) 13:17, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What was the goddess of sea last words
Talk:BAe Systems

message: This page should be directed to 'BAE SYSTEMS' - not the other way around. The official name for the company is ALL-CAPS. sugarfish 06:30, 27 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: The important part is BAE, which is strictly all capitalised. It was an acronym for British Aerospace. With the creation of BAE Systems it ceased to be (i.e. BAe Systems is incorrect). You can do what you like with the Systems/SYSTEMS bit. Mark83 20:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tłı̨chǫ

message: I think the article should be at Tlicho. The GNWT in various places such as MACA and this press release refer to the people as Tlicho and not Tli Cho. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 12:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: The Tåîchô orthography is  false. Its true is Tłı̨chǫ Kmoksy (talk) 02:07, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  false orthography 
Talk:Equine forelimb anatomy

message: Hello.
The illustration for the article "Equine Forelimb Anatomy" appears to be a HIND leg.
You might wish to correct this.
E.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.16.76.218 (talk) 22:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its a diagram from the cannon bone down, could be either a front or hind leg, you are confusing the sesamoids at the fetlock with the hock joint, I think (?) Montanabw(talk) 04:30, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: This article would be improved by adding material on the shoulder and forearm.  There used to be a better image of the entire forelimb, including the shoulder, what happened to it??  Montanabw(talk) 05:59, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Above the knee? 

message: This article would be improved by adding material on the shoulder and forearm.  There used to be a better image of the entire forelimb, including the shoulder, what happened to it??  Montanabw(talk) 06:56, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Above the knee?
Talk:Pope Pius XII

message: Aside the fact that the quote is from what is at least a ternary source (because I assume the quote is faithful), as well as the question whether the pope knew anti-semitic laws were "being formulated" in Hungary at the same time, I don't think that the source proves that that the pope referred to Jews, but it explicitly denies that he made a direct reference, and this much is clear from the quote in the source:
At the very least, the reference in the article should be reformulated to express doubt. I would prefer it to be expressed as an opinion of the author of the tertiary source unless there are others that independently agree. Paxcoder (talk) 20:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Cardinal Pacelli was not the Papal Nuncio to Argentina nor to Budapest. He was the Vatican's equivalent to Secretary of State. He was number two to Pope Pius XI whom the Nazis and Communists didn't want to become Pope. That's why they tried to assassinate him. They even tried to assassinate him when he became Pope Pius XII but the Papal security stopped all such attempts. It is dishonest to claim he was a supporter of the Nazis. 2603:9000:6213:3A00:C9F4:22A6:3346:1180 (talk) 02:23, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged reference 

message: 3:08 AM (02:08 GMT) was a probable birthtime of Pope Pius XII. Birthtimes and deathtimes are important because of the differences of timezones. The standard time of Wikipedia is GMT, not including DST.
189.98.244.242 (talk) 13:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthtime of Pope Pius XII 

message: The redirect Pope Pius XII: Illness and death has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 03:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pope Pius XII: Illness and death]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Pope Pius XII: illness and death has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Veverve (talk) 03:25, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pope Pius XII: illness and death]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Battle of Nanking

message: There has been an slow ongoing edit war about this image for a while. I think for readers with familiarity in the historiography of Second Sino-Japanese War, the propaganda nature of this image should be apparent (as both the Chinese and the Japanese actively participated in producing photographies for their narrative). Personally I think it is fine to include this image, but the nature of the image should be indicated somewhere. One problem is that photos from the China Incident Photograph Album (where this photo was from) are not consistently propagandist, and I cannot find any sources explicitly calling out these images as propagandist, so I can see arguments for both sides. Any thoughts? Alex Shih (talk) 22:53, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This is shameless and completely wrong depiction of the battle of nanking and truth of the aftermath which resulted in the brutal and horrendous rape of nanking. This is one of the most blatantly wrong pages on wikipedia for such an important event in modern japanese and chinese history. It is almost as if Tojo made this page himself for propaganda. Dabigman69 (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

text: This is shameless and completely wrong depiction of the battle of nanking and truth of the aftermath which resulted in the brutal and horrendous rape of nanking. This is one of the most blatantly wrong pages on wikipedia for such an important event in modern japanese and chinese history. It is almost as if Tojo made this page himself for propaganda. Dabigman69 (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

text: This is shameless and completely wrong depiction of the battle of nanking and truth of the aftermath which resulted in the brutal and horrendous rape of nanking. This is one of the most blatantly wrong pages on wikipedia for such an important event in modern japanese and chinese history. It is almost as if Tojo made this page himself for propaganda. Dabigman69 (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The image 

message: Please update the hatnote

to

-- 70.51.45.46 (talk) 05:07, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done DBigXrayᗙ 05:46, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: This is shameless and completely wrong depiction of the battle of nanking and truth of the aftermath which resulted in the brutal and horrendous rape of nanking. This is one of the most blatantly wrong pages on wikipedia for such an important event in modern japanese and chinese history. It is almost as if Tojo made this page himself for propaganda. Dabigman69 (talk) 15:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most of the pictures are blatant propaganda and shameless biased towards showing Japanese in a good light
Talk:Bill Werbeniuk

message: I'm no expert, but , ,  and  all say he took Inderal (propranolol) to help his heart cope with the alcohol consumption, not for the tremor per se (this would make sense, as accoriding to  it's often prescribed for angina, heart arrhythmia and similar conditions). --Camembert
: says his doctors advised him to switch to Inderal,  implies it, and [4] is vague about it. However, since he kept drinking while taking Inderal some clarification seems necessary. Trontonian 01:26, 14 Jan 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Cite the sources in the article then. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 19:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Inderal
Talk:Olivença

message: Error (Remove "internationally recognized". -nl: (pt: is broken because of ç). Coat) 
* Error, you removed this sentence but that is "correct". It was said, more than once (by more than one MP) in the Portuguese parliament during the discussion of this problem. They base this claim on the triety of Vienna, that is why it is "internationally recognized" (the smaller party of the government said this more than once and they justified it), because it is based on international law. Meanwhile... it is administrated by Spain. It is just an odd case. Hugs -Pedro 20:32, 14 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it, so that we don't give the impression that UN, EU, NATO, Hague courts, or the like have an official opinion on the matter. -- Error 00:10, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the United States had a say on the Perejil island crisis. The NATO treaties exclude Gibraltar, Ceuta and Melilla, I think. -- Error 03:57, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Tell that to Mohammed VI. -- Error 22:57, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text:  It may be old, but since it's not marching on, those not content with the statu quo, will have to put it into debates. -- Error 22:57, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: internationally recognized

message: Is it NPOV to write: "Olivenca is a Portuguese territory illegaly occupied by Spain." ? olivier 15:54, 27 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: :Olivença is an internationally recognized Portuguese territory under Spanish administration
Do international instances have an official position on the Olivenza issue?
Examples?
-- Error 00:03, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Olivença is an internationally recognized Portuguese territory under Spanish administration

message: The alcaide of Olivenza is "known" for the disinformation, and I believe it is the source of this:
:alcalde. Alcaide is a prison chief (warden?) -- Error 04:02, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: For outsiders, we are talking about a mayor. Alcaide comes from Arabic qaid and alcalde from qadi. -- Error 00:51, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

text: National newspapers or Extremaduran ones? I didn't know about it. Anyway if it is not on TV, it doesn't exist. -- Error 04:02, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: disinformation from the alcaide to newspapers 

message: The portuguese point of view is the only true for this article. The spanish CURRENT name of the city is a redirection, and the territorie appears in a map with other portuguesse lands. This is the wikipedia spirit? Just one point of view?
It sucks!
:I propose using the Spanish name for events after the Spanish take and the Portuguese name for events during Portuguese rule and for translations from Portuguese --Error 05:51, 19 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totally 'impartial' article
Talk:William Kunstler

message: Re: "Chicago Seven" or "Chicago Eight". The case started with eight defendents, but the trial of Bobby Seale was separated from the other seven and heard separately. For this reason, the main trial is now called the "Chicago Seven." At least, this is my understanding of the situation. --Jose Ramos 18:40, 27 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have been criticized concerning remarks about Kunstler. What I said was quoted from Esquire magazine; I know little about him and until a contemporary attorney told me so, I didn't even know he had anything to do with the Chicago Seven. The quotes about him werre from the magazine. I assure my critics I am not searching for people to criticize but Kunstler appears to make it easy--the memories of JFK and Bobby Kennedy being what they are. Dougie monty (talk) 09:48, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Saying that "it's in Esquire" doesn't really cut it for a BLP article.  The sourcing needs to be better, especially considering how negatively those kinds of comments would be viewed.  I didn't find a single Google hit for those quotes except for a Wikipedia mirror, and I see no evidence at all that they exist.  If they're genuine, find better sourcing.  Croctotheface (talk) 06:35, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Though I doubt that the EXACT quote uses the word "entrirely", that kind of sourcing is more adequate.  Previously, the quote had been somewhere between unsourced and poorly sourced.  Croctotheface (talk) 05:40, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kennedys 

message: I have yet to find sources to verify/establish the importance of the following, but preserve them here for the ease of future editors who wish to. Savidan 21:02, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed uncited material 

message: Does anyone know about his defense of the Fountain Valley Five, who were accused of killing eight people in 1972 in St. Croix, US Virgin Islands? According to this site it was a pretty big thing at the time, with international coverage and black vs. white implications. Seems like it ought to be in our article on Kunstler (and maybe have its own page as well). Duoduoduo (talk) 21:31, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fountain Valley Five
Talk:Who Am I? (1998 film)

message: The following is the original content of the article:
Who Am I? is for most people a philosophical question.
For people with amnesia, it may be a question of immdiate practical relevance. 
See also:
* The meaning of life
* religion
* spirituality
* mysticism
* philosophy
* science, biology, and psychology
* mental illness
wshun 22:26, 27 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I suppose it should be mentioned that the car Jackie Chan drives in this was his personal car. Also there should be mention of the goof that in one point the car drives on it's side and when you see it later there are no scratches as well as the rear view mirror still being there. Abrynkus 01:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Car Chase
Talk:The Deep Blue Sea (play)

message: Hold on a moment, please -- are you sure this is a film? --KF 22:48, 27 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, KF.  My fault Lypheklub 22:53, 27 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: A film of the play was released in 1955.  TheMadBaron 23:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I don't think this is in the text — it's not specified. (FWIW I thought it was a compassionate abortion.) Tagged. --217.155.32.221 (talk) 18:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: User:DJRafe has provided an external reference supporting the contention and my take on the incident, from an audience member's perspective, seems to have been wrong. Thanks. --217.155.32.221 (talk) 13:06, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  From the external references, your first impression, that Miller had committed some sort of homosexual offence, but that it was not immediately evident in the text, seems to have been correct.  Rattigan apparently felt obliged to suppress that idea as well for the published play, after his initial drafts. DJRafe (talk) 23:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Homosexual offence"
Talk:World of Warcraft

message: The information under the "expansions" section is outdated. This sentence specifically: As of the pre-patch release of Battle for Azeroth in July 2018, all expansions up to Legion are included in the base game.
Change that to "As of the release of the Dragonflight expansion in 2022, all expansions up to Shadowlands are included in the base game." 
Source is here: https://us.battle.net/support/en/article/15733
You should also write something to clarify the modern precedent that Blizzard has set that when an expansion concludes, then it is included into the base game for subscribers.
ADDITIONALLY
Under "Ongoing Gameplay" the terminology about PvP gameplay is outdated. Players no longer "flag" themselves for PvP as the primary way to engage with in PvP, they instead "toggle War Mode", as mentioned near the beginning of the article.
"Depending on the mode of the realm," is confusing wording and is no longer relevant now that servers are only RP or PvE. 
As an opposite to the "free-for-all" PvP areas that are mentioned, it could be worth mentioning areas flagged as "Sanctuaries" in the game where PvP is not possible and not permitted.
ADDITIONALLY
Under "Animated Series"
The "Afterlives" series is not a traditional animated show, and are more like animated trailers for the upcoming story. You can use the world "series", but it's worth noting that "Warbringers" and "Harbingers" are titles of other series made in a similar fashion and should be included. Chickachoy (talk) 19:41, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please indicate the changes you want to be made in a "change X to Y" format, as you did for the first change. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 15:03, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 April 2023 

message: I suggest it would be best to merge Nostalrius with this page. I assert the other page topic's notability does not meet Wikipedia's Notability Guidelines. I will suggest to merge Nostalrius into the section "Community and study of player interaction," but please provide your opinion if you believe it should find its new home in a different section of the page. RandomPageCrusader (talk) 03:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Support In this case, it's less notability and more undue weight. Nostalrius can definitely fit as a section in this article, and as such a split from the main article is not necessary.  Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 02:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Proposal 

message: I hereby request that the tag, "merge from|Nostalrius|discuss=Talk:World of Warcraft#Merge Proposal|date=March 2024" be added to the top of this article with the appropriate braces to parse it properly in the system. RandomPageCrusader (talk) 03:42, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to Edit Protected Article
Talk:Familial Alzheimer disease

message: This is an old essay i had to write. It was meant to be short and properly referenced etc. (I'm not too proud of it.)
It still has all the references embedded it. They can be changed if a standard referencing method is established for Wikipedia.
I'm releasing it under the terms of the GFDL (like the rest of Wikipedia).
T 23:41, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I will take a pass at Wikifying it --Chrispounds 16:06, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  older entries 

message: To be completely blunt, this is completely incomprehensible to someone with little to no education in medicine or the disease.  There is very little in the way of useful information that can be gleaned from this for someone who is looking for information, which is how I ended up here.  Please, people who are watching this, fix it. --badlydrawnjeff talk 15:11, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This really needs a rewrite 

message: I've duplicated all the text in this article to Early-onset Alzheimer's disease. The plan is to copy this talk page into that talk page. This article can then be a simple redirect page (#REDIRECT Early-onset Alzheimer's disease). I did it to make more sense of the main Alzheimer's introduction, as it needed to cover all early-onset AD, and FAD accounts for only half on that. I was bold, but it can easily be reversed. 
I've asked for comments on Talk:Early-onset Alzheimer's disease.--Matt Lewis (talk) 02:01, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirect made. --19:10, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Familial AD into [[Early-onset Alzheimer's disease]]
Talk:Hot salt frying

message: I have never observed this technique anywhere else in Mexico, although it may be fairly common. User:Theabroma
definitely original research, this material is good but the info should probably be worked in as less of a personal anecdote:
This technique was also observed in San Blas, Nayarit, Mexico, along the zócalo, in July 1991.  A vendor had placed a large clay cazuela on top of a 4-legged, waist high charcoal brazier.  The cazuela was filled with coarse salt.  After the salt became hot, the vendor toasted/fried pepitas, or pumpkin seeds in their shells in the hot salt, stirring them with a slotted spoon.  When the seeds were "done", the vendor spooned them into tiny paper bags and sold them to strollers in the zocalo for an afternoon or evening snack.
yEvb0 03:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mexico

message: The website "Foodista" is the only source cited for hot salt frying. It appears to be a user-generated site, which might make its reliability questionable. Worse, the earliest version of the page that I can find (April 2009 in the Internet Archive), is virtually identical to the September 2008 version of this page. It seems likely that either a Wikipedia editor copied the content from Foodista or a Foodista contributor copied it from Wikipedia.
The one source cited for hot sand frying appears to be a defunct web page. Cnilep (talk) 03:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: In India this is done everywhere, but as this is street food it does not get covered in literature. I would not know where to find sources covering this practice but it is ubiquitous.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:52, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: No one is doubting the truth of what is written here. But Wikipedia content has to be (1) not in violation of anyone's copyright, (2) not plagiarized, regardless of copyright, (3) verifiable, and (4) notable. Cnilep (talk) 23:41, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The proper thing to do would be to delete all of the text in the article. Go ahead.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 11:44, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreliable source 