Talk:Interest rate parity

message: This article is poorly written and essentially unreferenced. The forward price article was of equally poor quality and said little to nothing about forward exchange rates which redirected to it. I have since eliminated that redirect and wrote a new forward exchange rate article that is well-referenced (however to be fair, it is in its initial stages) that begins tying into CIRP. I'm going to begin rewriting the interest rate parity article as well, because as it stands it just jumps into formulas for the two types of interest rate parity and then runs the reader through some questionable and convoluted examples - this article really doesn't say a whole lot about what CIRP and UIRP actually are, or why they're relevant - the little it does say is unsubstantiated conjecture, leaving the article dreadfully inaccurate and useless to any layman. Anyone willing to help is more than welcome. I'm trying to radically rewrite international finance & economics articles that presently don't even come close to adhering to Wikipedia's core content policies: WP:NOR, WP:V, & WP:NPOV. Most of the key references for IRP will need to be textbooks and scholarly articles published in peer-reviewed academic journals. I intend to clean up this talk page as well, since the posts are haphazardly scattered and unsigned. John Shandy` • talk 03:33, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have radically rewritten the article as a start. I think it is a great improvement, because it not only presents the equations, but it explains what the conditions are, what the variables are, what the relationships mean and so forth. I didn't throw in a ton of numerical examples, because I think it's unnecessary and extraneous to understanding the relationships. I felt the previous examples that ran through calculations didn't really help anyone, especially not any laymen, understand the parity conditions. We can perhaps introduce simpler examples later on, but I think it unnecessary and unclean for now. John Shandy` • talk 04:33, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radical rewrite in progress 

message: This is nothing much more then opcion costing (not pricing), and derivative costing. All nations are communist upto a certain level, and that implies that all nations exert COST controls to inhibit end drain capital marauding cycles. The USofA is NO different than any other, the primary reason for them doing that better NOT being that they really DO that better, but that they are as yet NOT superpopulous due their own creations in excess.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.208.189.225 (talk) 13:57, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note: 

message: Should we subject this article to peer review? Lbertolotti (talk) 15:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Peer_review|Peer review]] 

message: Dr. Benassy-Quere has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:
We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.
We believe Dr. Benassy-Quere has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:
*Reference : Agnes Benassy-Quere & Sophie Bereau & Valerie Mignon, 2009. "The Dollar in the Turmoil," Working Papers 2009-08, CEPII research center.
ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 15:48, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Benassy-Quere's comment on this article