Talk:Chicken as food

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 15:24, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Chicken (food) →  – We generally prefer WP:NATURAL disambiguation on Wikipedia, and we also like CHICKEN WINGSWP:CONSISTENCY - see turkey meat. Red Slash 17:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any evidence that this is actually called chicken meat?--67.68.31.244 (talk) 16:52, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
I agree with Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!), it should be Chicken as food.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NewMutants (talk • contribs) 13:59, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  RM (2015 June) 

message: This article is crap that picture is not right 73.162.28.9 (talk) 05:33, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a better picture? 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 01:30, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What 

message: 100 grams of chicken meat also contains 0.41 µg of Vitamin B12. Why is this not mentioned? Reputable sources are easy to find all over the internet. Yes, the chicken is a good source of Vitamin B12 and the article is not mentioning it. Please include it.  Here is the source https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/331897/nutrients — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.64.136.84 (talk) 03:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vitamin B12 in Chicken 

message: They have B12 in them ,it is a good example for B12 102.67.1.3 (talk) 17:07, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What can chicken do 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. Clear consensus to stay with current title based largely on WP:CONSISTENT. (non-admin closure) Skynxnex (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Chicken as food →  – a more specific and engaging title could enhance the article's appeal and accessibility to readers 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 02:00, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Oppose, as this name format is not used in any other similar articles listed in  or subcategories. Also I would like to note that even if consensus to move per nominator's reasoning is found, the new name should be Chicken in culinary practices per Wikipedia's capitalization policy. Bensci54 (talk) 16:43, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well if that's the case I can agree to change the new name to "Chicken in culinary practices". Additionally, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 02:24, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Oppose. We have dozens of "as food" articles:  Fish as food, Snails as food, Eggs as food, ... and no "...in culinary practices" articles. Why should chicken be any different? --Macrakis (talk) 20:38, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Other articles may look different, that's the nature of Wikipedia. Fish as food could possibly be improved, but that's not particularly relevant to this discussion. 🅲🅻🅴🆃🅴🆁 (a word) 02:23, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 February 2024