Talk:Old Toronto

message: Currently, there is a discussion regarding this issue, since I believe that the term "Old Toronto" is very ambiguous.  Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 21:33, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In the above discussion it has been suggested to rename this page Toronto (former), I support that. JosephIWMolto (talk) 18:46, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Toronto and "Downtown" are not the same thing! 

message: Why are we still discussing this? Inertia? We (Torontonians) still refer to Scarborough, East York, Etobicoke, Toronto, etc. Canada Post still delivers to the cities of Scarborough, Toronto, etc. so to call Toronto Old Toronto is simply not right. I've never heard of Toronto being referred to as Old Toronto. This is the first and only time (in my 14 years in Toronto and 2 months out in the wilds of Scarborough) I've ever heard that name. City of Toronto indicates that you're talking about the unwieldy, dysfunctional megacity we're saddled with. If you want to distinguish between Toronto and the City of Toronto you could always use 'Metro Toronto'. People may refer to Metro Toronto when talking about the city of Toronto that existed before the megacity City of Toronto was foisted upon us.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.71.255.227 (talk) 02:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been bugged by this problem for some time, but don't really have a solution.  There are a lot of pages and references which link to this (including the Toronto infobox), so it would be some work to fix it up properly.  I have no problems with your proposal, so if you have the time to work on it, go ahead.  If you're going to take on a large piece of work, it's a good idea to get an ID and set up a user page and stable talk page.  It will help reduce the chance of your changes being reverted, among other reasons. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 20:43, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I think this question of the article name desperately needs to be sorted out.  It seems to me that the primary difficulty is that any attempt at consistency leeds to two equally problematic names:
* Old Toronto was a municipality which disappeared along with Scarborough, East York, York, North York and Etobicoke in 1998.  The pages for those municipalities are named:  Scarborough, Ontario; East York, Ontario; York, Ontario; North York, Ontario and Etobicoke (redirected from Etobicoke, Ontario) so the simplist solution is to call the article Toronto, Ontario were it not the case that that title interferes with naming for the current 'Megacity' of Toronto page.  I assume there is nothing that can be done about that, after all the current Toronto really is a municipality in Ontario so Toronto, Ontario shouldn't really lead to the article for the old City?  The only caveat is that if we divide articles on municipalities into: 
* regional (counties, districts, metropolis) municipalities
* local (city, town, borough, village) municipalities
* unincorporated communities (postal villages, neighbourhoods, 'geographic' townships)
-slightly different naming patters have developed for each.  Despite being otherwise completely inconsistent in their naming pattern, most articles on regions have the designation in the title:  'York County, Ontario', 'Metropolitan Toronto' and 'Regional Municipality of York' so the current 'megacity' of Toronto (if we treat it as a region which it effectively is, if not officially) should be 'City of Toronto' (current, post 1998 city) which leaves 'Toronto, Ontario' for the old (1834-1998) city in line with the article names for the other defunct local governments within the City of Toronto.  Then the effective rule would be:
* regions would be named 'County of X' or 'X District' or 'Metropolitan X' or 'City of X' (megacity with no region)
* local governments (and former local governments) would be named 'X, Ontario'
* communities would be 'X, Toronto'
- 'Toronto' would lead to 'City of Toronto' (post 1998) or a Toronto disambiguation page.  In this case would it be problematic calling the article on the old city (1834-1998) Toronto, Ontario?
If we are looking for some sort of consistency, there are two other possible solutions I think:
* a hierarchechal style which would include the name of the higher municipality.  Toronto, Ontario in this case would be the article on the modern 'megacity' which would leave the old city (1834-1998) as Toronto, Toronto (former City of Toronto in the former Metropolis of Toronto) or an equally confusing Toronto, York (former City of Toronto in the former County of York).
* the last solution is regardless of whether the name is Toronto or Toronto, Ontario for either the pre or the post 1998 article, a word could simply be added to the end of the name of a defunct municipality:  Toronto or Toronto, Ontario would be the post 1998 city, Toronto (?) or Toronto, Ontario (?) where ? is defunct or former would then be the name of the pre 1998 City (I think calling an article historic or old can be misleading).  Of course this would not be consistent with how the other former cities of Metro have been named (Scarborough, Ontario; East York, Ontario etc.)
-One other thing to keep in mind is that the last solution treats a former municipality as only an entity of the past while, in effect, Toronto, Etobicoke, Scarborough etc. can also be considered current 'regions' or 'super neighbourhoods' of the current 'megacity' in which case we could be treating them more like neighbourhoods (many of which are also defunct municipalities while many others were never more the postal communities or commercial developments).  Not that that helps much, there is little consistency in the naming of Toronto neighbourhoods except a tendency towards a hierarchichal style X, Toronto (such as Riverdale, Toronto) which would lead us back to the unacceptable name Toronto, Toronto (mega neighbourhood of Toronto in the modern City of Toronto)?!?  If it is possible(?) to develop any general guidelines it could help with other naming questions! JosephIWMolto (talk) 09:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retitle article and links to it