Talk:IPX/SPX

message: The article states:
 Like UDP, IPX is a datagram protocol used for connectionless communications.
 ...
 SPX is a transport layer protocol (layer 4 of the OSI Model) used in Novell Netware
 networks. The SPX layer sits on top of the IPX layer (layer 3 - the network layer) and
 provides connection-oriented services between two nodes on the network.
 ...
 IPX and SPX both provide connection services similar to TCP/IP, with the IPX protocol
 having similarities to IP, and SPX having similarities to TCP.
The first entry conflicts with the two latter and is probably in error.  I'm assuming that it should say, "Like IP, IPX is a packet protocol..." or, "Like UDP, SPX is a datagram protocol...".  I know virtually nothing about IPX/SPX, but I know that UDP is a multiplexing datagram service and that IP deals with packets.  I assume from its name that SPX operates like a sequenced version of UDP instead of a streaming model like TCP.  Can anyone shed some light here? --Heywood 19:30, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: However, if IPX can multiplex ports like UDP (effectively serving unsequenced datagrams by itself), the second snippet should specify this, since it would act like both a layer 3 and layer 4 protocol. --Heywood 19:40, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed

message: The comparison is great lets you know what something is like but in this case it only holds back from what SPX really is. Sequenced packet Exchange (SPX) The packets are sent with a numbering system just like TCP so they can be rearranged on the receiving end Just like TCP. Making for a more reliable connection. But Once again I got my info from a book Written by J. L. Antonakos and H. C. Mansfield Jr. read my post under IPX Discussion
Change to "Split Tunnel"..... or elimitate since this is true with all other possiable protocols.
One area where IPX remains useful is to sidestep VPN (client software that does not allow Split tunnel) that force all TCP/IP traffic to traverse the VPN, preventing any access to local resources such as printers and shared disks (on the same lan while connected to the vpn).
At least one Ethernet Bypass Switch (NetOptics BP-HBCU3 10/100/1000 Bypass Switch with Heartbeat) uses IPX packets as heartbeat packets: it sends them to the in-line device, and removes them when they return. If they do not return, it knows the device is down and bypasses it. I suspect they use IPX packets because they are unlikely to be confused with actual data packets.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SXandR (talk • contribs) 18:17, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison =

message: IPX can be compared to UDP; SPX can be compared to TCP; neither of them can be compared to IP; SPX is implemented on top of IPX, like TCP isn't implemented on top of UDP NevemTeve (talk) 13:35, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparing protocols 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on IPX/SPX. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110726194806/http://software.itags.org/bsd/10745/ to http://software.itags.org/bsd/10745/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:07, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Disagree. IPX is a transport layer (and network layer) protocol, while IPX/SPX is a protocol family. The proposal is almost equivalent to a proposal to merge Internet protocol suite with Internet Protocol. Kolarp (talk) 12:20, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge IPX/SPX with IPX 

message: What is this supposed to mean?: One area where IPX remains useful is for bypassing VPN connections with security policies that prohibit communication with other LAN devices (such as printers and network attached storage) via TCP/IP.[citation needed]
I vote to remove that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by B0ef (talk • contribs) 22:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bypass