lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:NatureServe

message: I removed the  template, which displayed the message "The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. (February 2012)" This is a US-based organization, dealing primarily with US wildlife conservation issues, including about a third of its budget coming from the US federal government, and most of the rest from US-based charities, with the majority of its expenditures supporting government organizations at various levels and charities within the US. They also do significant work in Canada, and some in Latin America, but the bulk of it is in the US. So while I agree the article is heavily US-focused, I don't think that's a valid criticism. Agyle (talk) 22:26, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing globalize tag 

message: I removed the  template from May 2012. This is a major charitable organization with a budget of $10 million a year, that does significant business supplying services to the US federal government, and that provides data cited in numerous academic papers (and on Wikipedia - see NatureServe conservation status). For example, do a search for NatureServe in Google Books and you'll find a lot of little references acknowledging use of their data, software tools, or other services. There is admittedly not a lot of verifiable third party information about the organization itself, but there is some, which I've now included in a few citations; more can dredged up from federal budgets, it would just take time. Overall I think there's enough at this point to justify the article's notability. Agyle (talk) 22:38, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed notability tag
Talk:Michael W. Holmes

message: Bearian (talk) 01:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility

message: I added detail to this section, supported by references. I also removed the following:
"In fact, PEER has never stated that the National Park Service employees were ordered to present 'non-science' based information. The Grand Canyon: A Different View still remains for sale in the Grand Canyon Park bookstore, and the pamphlet, 'Geologic Interpretive Programs: Distinguishing Science from Religion' is still awaiting approval."
The first sentence seems at odd with the facts, since PEER's original press release did assert that Grand Canyon National Park is "not permitted" to give an age estimate due to political pressure, and Ruch stated that NPS is "under orders to suspend its belief in geology." The second sentence just repeats information from the previous section (I reworded the information in that previous section to be clearer). -Zefryl (talk) 03:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed section because PEER retracted its earlier statement and it would be WP:UNDUE to keep it here. Mistake was corrected by PEER in appropriate manner. Mervyn Emrys (talk) 13:33, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skeptic controversy 

message: Given that the only third-party-sourced content in Grand Canyon: A Different View is on the controversy covered in this article's 'Grand Canyon' section, I am proposing merging it here. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 07:39, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Because of PEER's complaint, the book was mentioned in national and international news providing far greater exposure for it than the publishers could have bought.  What would have happened if they had said nothing?  AshforkAZ (talk) 08:04, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Irrelevant -- WP:NOTAFORUM & WP:CRYSTAL. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 08:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

text: (Parenthetically, given that the book's Amazon Bestsellers Rank is only #517,160, it is hard to see why PEER would care. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 08:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Social Venture Network

message: Especially in the first sentence of the intro, "committed to building a just and sustainable world". I suggest that the phrase be removed and the whole article be reviewed for inappropriate tone. -Pgan002 (talk) 05:09, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advert tone 

message: Well known famous make-up artist who has won "Make-up Naani" award in 2011. Passed away on Sunday 6th November, 2016.
 Swetha Subbaraj (talk) 11:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indra Sena Raju (Indranna)
Talk:Student Environmental Action Coalition

message: In my opinion this article is heavily biased. I'm don't know anything about the subject (I clicked "random article" to get here) so I can't do much about it other than this (that and I'm lazy). Thought that it should at least be noted, though. G man yo (talk) 15:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: This is just impossible.  Removing this change. JimMcL61 (talk) 20:16, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solebury?
Talk:Sustainable South Bronx

message: *James Chase/believe me/Givechase, actually I now see from Googling you that you are the Communications Director for Sustainable South Bronx.Although I do not believe it is absolutely forbidden for you to edit articles like the one on your organization or its employees, it is HIGHLY DISCOURAGED by Wikipedia policy and your contributions should strive to be beyond reproach.  I do not think blanking the page is appropriate for a publicist employed by a related organization.Drawn Some (talk) 10:45, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article being repeatedly edited by paid publicity person

message: That James Burling Chase / believe me/ Givingchase is not even employed by Sustainable South Bronx but as VP for Communications and Marketing for the for-profit Majora Carter Group, LLC. http://www.majoracartergroup.com/jamesburlingchasebio
I will suggest that through your edits, vandalism of pages like Majora Carter, Brad Pitt, and Sean Combs, as well as from your comments on the Majora Carter talk page, that you are not and cannot be an objective editor of this encyclopedia on subjects such as Majora Carter and Sustainable South Bronx.  I will continue to monitor your promotional/marketing/PR efforts on Wikipedia and take any necessary action in requesting administrative intervention to prevent you from subverting the goals of this encyclopedia for your own professional and financial gain. Shame on you. Drawn Some (talk) 03:37, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Turns out that this situation is even worse than I thought
Talk:TreePeople

message: The Andy Lipkis article has more info about TreePeople than this article does, and not that much info about Lipkis himself, so if nobody objects, I'll merge it over here.--Aervanath's signature is boring 00:33, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The TreePeople content of Andy Lipkis should be moved to the TreePeople page and some real biographical detail added to Andy Lipkis. If there are no real biographical details to be found (and a quick look and search didn't find any) it should be deleted. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:39, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; and probably will do it some time... L.tak (talk) 22:44, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Andy Lipkis]] into this article
Talk:Jerrygibbsite

message: "Very little recent activity has been noted about jerrygibbsite. Its most highly cited paper, with four citings is that of Yau, who tested mixed layering between leucophoenicite and jerrygibbsite. The second highest is that of Dunn, with three citings, who discovered the mineral in the first place. No recent literature or images are available."
Moved the above to the talk page as it does not seem to be encyclopedic. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Literature search

message: *Jerrygibbsite, A Rare Mineral Discovered at the Franklin Mines, New Jersey, 1984, and its Relation to the Leucophoenicite and Humite Group. Kira Norman University of Houston December 1, 2007
I am not sure what this is supposed to refer to, and it is not used in the article, so I have moved it here. Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:14, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Unknown Reference
Talk:Aventine Renewable Energy

message: This company is in stock exchange and produces 696 million gallons in the United States. It is a reference for biofuels in the international field.  --Nukeless 07:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Company 
Talk:Hume Power Station

message: The article currently states "The power station ... generated 52,742 megawatts (70,728,000 hp) of net energy production during 2009,".  Firstly, we don't need "production" if we've already got "generated", do we? Secondly, 52,742 megawatts is power not energy. Jimp 08:19, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Net energy production
Talk:Murray Hydroelectric Power Station

message: I propose that Murray-2 Hydroelectric Power Station be merged into Murray-1 Hydroelectric Power Station. I think that the content in the Murray 2 article can easily be explained in the context of Murray 1 article by adding a separate section, and the Murray 1 article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Murray 2 will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned.  The precedent for the proposed merger is already established for the three power stations at Tumut. Rangasyd (talk) 12:45, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Tumut article looks a bit cluttered with two infoboxes down the side, and it really should have a third (for Tumut 1). Other than that I don't have any major objections to the merge. With the resources I have at hand I would only be able to expand the detail on each power station to a couple of paragraphs - not really ehnough to justify separate articles. Wongm (talk) 12:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Tumut fixed to look much less cluttered. Rangasyd (talk) 12:44, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the proposal, particularly given the current size of each article.--NortyNort  (Holla) 15:21, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Thanks. This one slipped off my radar. Rangasyd (talk) 06:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Solar chemical

message: Hello, I just wanted to express my intention to edit this page in the next few days. Please let me know of any concerns or questions. Stmarom (talk) 15:38, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intended changes 
Talk:Verbio

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of :Category:Environment on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with this assessment, please:
# Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Assessment#Quality scale;
#Remove the stub template from the article.
11 December 2007‎
Removed, as no longer relevant. --House1630 (talk) 16:42, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Wind-hydrogen hybrid power system

message: I think the article title (Wind-hydrogen hybrid power systems) violates the WP:SINGULAR guideline, and thus the proper title should be:
*Wind-hydrogen hybrid power system
Before moving an article, we customarily check its backlinks to see what links to this article may need adjustment. A number of pages link to the redirect page:
*Wind-Hydrogen Hybrid Power Systems
which would become double redirects after the move. I will move the article and manually fix the backlinks to avoid the redirects, because there are not too many. --Teratornis (talk) 21:38, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title violates WP:SINGULAR 

message: I undid the "merge" of three unrelated articles for reasons mentioned in the discussion Talk:Pumped-storage_hydroelectricity#Suggest_merge.  If anyone wishes to join in the discussion, since it now concerns this page as well, please do so there.  Dream Focus 16:09, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: New merge discussion is there now.  Dream Focus 10:45, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Blue bag

message: Perhaps we could include a section about the blue bags in Taiwan?
There are many pages with information about them:
https://www.buzzworthy.com/taiwan-garbage-disposal/
https://www.globalcitizen.org/en/content/taiwan-musical-garbage-trucks-recycling/
https://www.wsj.com/articles/taiwan-the-worlds-geniuses-of-garbage-disposal-1463519134
I think they are quite notable as they are the only legal way for Taiwanese residents to dispose of their garbage.
C0n0r97 (talk) 07:52, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Good call. Although it does seem a bit weirdly arbitrary to have an article about "garbage bags which happen to be blue", though, rather than colour-coded garbage sacks in general. (Orange is also a common colour for recycling, by the looks of it.) --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:59, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan Blue Bags
Talk:Catchwater

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of Category:Environment on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with this assessment, please:
# Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Assessment#Quality scale;
#Remove the stub template from the article.
This page is really missing information. The info that is present doesn't have any source connected to it, so how do we know how factual it is. I would start by finding relevant information that does support information that is already located in the article. The information in the article now is about where they have some catchwater systems and what they are. I would add more about the positive and negative aspects about catchwater. Maybe put a picture of what they look like so people can understand exactly what it is.
Duckcollector8 (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

message: I am new to actively editing Wikipedia.  I want to add a ‘See Also’ section to this article and add in some links to smaller scale capture of rainwater and greywater articles.
Guidance on how to approach this task would be welcome.  
Guidance on what are the recommended section headers to use ( like See Also ) and how to propose new ones are welcome.
I expect documentation exists on these topics for new contributors, but finding such info is not easy. CuriousMarkE (talk) 04:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also section needed
Talk:Certified wood

message: * 18:36, 15 June 2009 Forestedit (talk | contribs) (2,697 bytes) (undo) (Tag: references removed)
*9 and 10 March 2010
 
The single-purpose account Foresetedit, with  this (click on this link) distinctive edit history, entirely confined to suppressing references and reports of public criticism at this article and at Sustainable Forestry Initiative‎, has made repeated attempts to suppress reports of criticism at both articles. Whether or not this IP is a shill for the lumber industry association represented by "Sustainable Forestry Initiative", edits from it and subversion at the two articles should be watched for. If a pattern of concerted subversion develops, this might be newsworthy. --Wetman (talk) 19:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attacks from [[User:Forestedit]] 

message: Other than the lead sentence, almost all of this article discusses forest certification. Would not that be a more accurate name for this article? Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 11:16, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name change? 
Talk:Environmental biotechnology

message: The first quoted statement "the development, use. . ." does not seem to be in the cited paper (Current Opinion in Biotechnology 16(3):243-245). Is this reference wrong?
Hop Hornbeam (talk) 12:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect reference? 
Talk:Game reserve

message: I agree with Dodger67 - this article is not the place to talk about misuse of Game reserves. Perhaps a section on Trophy hunting would be reasonable. Wizzy…☎ 09:51, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  misuse 

message: Explain how game reserve is being change to national park  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.112.120.77 (talk) 18:30, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourism
Talk:List of climate change initiatives

message: Its hard to make a logical grouping out of this as CC is a global problem and those initiatives are often become international after starting out as a local or national scheme. I've settled on International (meaning something that links tobether regional actions), regional (e.g. within part of a continent) and then lower levels. Ephebi (talk) 13:00, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grouping 

message: Change title to clarify intent: Climate change mitigation.  99.39.185.226 (talk) 23:50, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you intend List of climate change mitigation initiatives for a title?  99.43.137.37 (talk) 01:37, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title to clarify intent: [[Climate change mitigation]] 

message: From Talk:Politics of global warming, from resource in current issue of Environment (Vol. 53, 5, Sept/Oct 2011) ... http://www.environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/September-October%202011/climate-change-full.html ... in particular Table 1. Flagship Legislation, such as 
* Japan's 1998 Law Concerning the Promotion of Measures to Cope with Global Warming (http://www.env.go.jp/en/laws/global/warming.html), amended in 2005;
* Mexico's 2005/2008 Inter-Secretariat Commission on Climate Change and the Law for the Use of Renewable Energies and for the Finance of the Energy Transition (LUREFET) 
* Canada's 2007 Kyoto Protocol Implementation Act; 
* Germany's 2007 Integrated Climate and Energy Programme (updated 2008)
* EU's 2008 European Union climate and energy package
* UK's Climate Change Act 2008
* India's 2008 National Action Plan on Climate Change
* United States's 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 and President Obama's Executive Order 13514: Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance
* France's 2009 Grenelle de la mer, Grenelle I, and Grenelle II; 
* Brazil's 2009 National Policy on Climate Change
* South Korea's 2009 Framework Act on Low Carbon Green Growth
... examples from the  16 world economies covered, including G8+5 covering 155 laws, regulations, policies and decrees of comparable status. 
99.190.87.183 (talk) 05:22, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resource in current issue of Environment (Vol. 53, 5, Sept/Oct 2011)  
Talk:Material efficiency

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses a sub-category of Category:Environment on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with this assessment, please:
# Change the above "class=stub" to "class=start" or another applicable class per Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment/Assessment#Quality scale;
#Remove the stub template from the article.
I plan on working on this stub and developing it into a respectable wikipedia page which provides adequate information on material efficiency including different kinds of materials which can be used today to build that save energy consumption, cut heating/cooling costs/ last longer than previously used materials, materials that are stronger, lighter, more durable in certain weather conditions.  Examples include materials better suited to be used in building homes in a very dry climate or homes that are in an area which frequently sees hurricanes or heavy rainfall.  Please comment with other ideas/additions. Larryhoover23 (talk) 22:10, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

message: Geardona (talk) 04:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit
Talk:Pollution market

message: I've redirected the article to Emissions trading. Although there was no apparent discussion on the merge proposal, this article hasn't been developed since it was first created and appears to be unsourced, while covering the same material as emissions trading. I have no particular hassles if someone wants to revert the change, though. - Bilby (talk) 04:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Manure-derived synthetic crude oil

message: The citation in the article, {cite news
|url= http://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/2009/07/05/new_economic_development_chief_well-versed_in_trade
|title= New economic development chief well-versed in trade
|author = Don Dodson
|publisher= The News-Gazette.com (requires subscription)
|date=2009-07-05
|accessdate=2009-08-28} seems dubious.  Could it be errata?  The title does not seem related and the source is not verifiable from online sources.  Someone who has access to this newspaper should put the relevant quotations, to support both extant uses of the source, here on this talk page.  Else, we should consider removing the citation entirely.N2e (talk) 15:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The exact citation is: "Meanwhile, he's acting as a consultant for Snapshot Energy, a start-up firm working to convert animal and human waste to biocrude. The technology was developed by UI professors Yuanhui Zhang and Lance Schideman." The Google snapshot is here. Beagel (talk) 16:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable citation 

message: The title of the article is ambiguous and misleading. Thermal depolymerization of biomass yields pyrolysis oil or bio-oil, a fluid that is both chemically and physically distinct from petroleum or crude oil. To be factually correct, the title should be changed to "Manure-derived pyrolysis oil" with all references to crude oil changed to avoid any reader confusion with petroleum crude oil.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.163.193.185 (talk) 16:31, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested title change 
Talk:Substitution principle (sustainability)

message: An earlier version of this article defined the principle as "substitution... that is more efficient or beneficial in some way while retaining the same functionality". This is arguably incorrect - assuming that electric cars, for example, are more sustainable but smaller and slower than petrol-powered cars, then the electric cars would normally be considered an important substitute, even though their functionality as a car is more limited. Paulwhaley (talk) 15:21, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of principle
Talk:Sustainable yield

message: — Assignment last updated by Naeim9146 (talk) 21:48, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ERTH 4303 Resources of the Earth

message: — Assignment last updated by KameronSch (talk) 03:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Sustainable Futures
Talk:Yamuna Action Plan

message: आइसीआइसीआइ ट्राई इस्लाम क्लिक कम क्रिस्टियानो जीवन kiddo juboothuboo kichhui nx booboo hii 2409:40D0:1000:E8B5:BD39:6840:8EF8:62E4 (talk) 11:43, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  यमुना स्वच्छता अभियान के आंकड़े
Talk:Design Week

message: The earlier versions of this page were flagged  and (cleanup tag moved to article where it belongs Washburnmav (talk) 19:37, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As this publication is a searchable verification source for graphic design biographies I have made a short-term clean-up by (i) adding verifiable citations about the publication and examples of its output, and (ii) moving unverifiable (potential spam) information into a new "About Design Week" section with the  tag. The Marketing Week and Creative Review articles may need similar treatment.
Pointillist (talk) 01:35, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled2
Talk:Robledo Puch

message: Hi everyone and thank you for reading this; I was wondering whether the lede should be summarized in a shorter version akin to most serial killers' articles. 
Instead of detailing his convictions (already in infobox), something like: Argentine serial killer, rapist, sex offender and robber. 
Or something like that. Please, I read opinions, I don't want to arbitrarily change the lede. Thanks. CoryGlee (talk) 12:06, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lede of article