lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lyrtech

message: Would love to see the history of the involvement of LyrTech in the development of the Ad Lib sound card.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeanph01 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find any sources about that. Someone not using his real name (talk) 04:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Development of the Ad Lib sound card

message: Most sources about the company are in French; La Presse has most of them here. This wiki page provides a very incomplete picture (too rosy); the company was in trouble even it wasn't on the verge of bankruptcy. The growth in revenues wasn't matched by a growth in profits etc. They were actually operating at a pretty big loss even they got that Deloitte ward  Also the direction of the company changed at least a couple of times.  Someone not using his real name (talk) 04:50, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: More sources
Talk:Lyon & Healy

message: This statement: "In the 1930s, Lyon & Healy was the first retailer in the world to sell upright pianos, a "vertical" piano designed to take up less space in newer, smaller homes, and to be sold for far less than the traditional grand piano."  makes no sense- upright pianos date back to the 18th century. Perhaps the author meant Spinet Upright. I'm taking the sentence out because it's 
wrong. Saxophobia (talk) 16:34, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upright piano new in 1930's? 

message: I tried to neutralize language and remove most of the marketing talk that is not pertinent.  when I have more time I will try to reorganize the piece as history jumps all over.
24.4.168.188 (talk) 06:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  edited language; deleted egregious marketing 

message: I was just reading and saw that the W stands for Washburn.  Should that be linked to Washburn guitars or is that a dead end?Longinus876 (talk) 23:44, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  George W. Lyon
Talk:Luvs

message: * "Live and learn, and then get Luvs" <- where does this fit on the timeline? --DSturges (talk) 21:04, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Gabe Jennings

message: Whoa, I just saw that this article is under attack by lacking notability. I do not know much of the big picture of this, but I have seen this guy run, and know a little about him. My dad knew who he was and some of his background. Just a thought. Juan Ponderas
I was a teammate of Gabe's at Stanford, and I'm pretty sure his proper first name is Gabriel. Does it make sense to move this article to "Gabriel_Jennings" and have "Gabe_Jennings" link to it? Mwdevine 12:14, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But he goes by Gabe, right? I think the wp page title is usually the name the person goes by - see Bill Clinton - and then other names, like the given names, link to that one. ErikHaugen (talk) 05:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lumicera

message: because it's worded like one Mirad1000 (talk) 01:09, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this an ad?
Talk:Luftschiffbau Zeppelin

message: If I read correctly, we're talking about two different companies using the same name. Company A, which was destroyed in the war, and company B which was inspired by company A and didn't exist before 1993. 
Therefore, the information is on the wrong page concerning the modern activities of company B named after company A.76.105.131.18 (talk) 00:53, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old company/new company 
Talk:Lufkin Industries

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:39, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Luden's

message: Is this article still stub status?  If so, what could be added to remove this tag?
Please keep discussion on this page.
Ggpauly (talk) 15:15, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub status 
Talk:Luctor International

message: * The company name has changed to [Van Gogh Imports], and the article should be moved to reflect that change.  Due to the youth of this account, I am unable to make those changes, but wanted to give disclosure that this page was being edited by an employee of the company. Vangoghimports (talk) 14:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Luaka Bop

message: It says this label was created in the late 1980s, yet Byrne's album "Catherine Wheel" was released on Luaka Bop in 1981.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.10.86.63 (talk) 10:07, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See The Catherine Wheel (album)#Release history for the relevant information. - dcljr (talk) 04:03, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Catherine Wheel

message: Because of the way the article is written I had concerns that some of the text may have been merely been copied from another source.  There were albums listed. Does this mean the whole catalouge of every record published by the label was copied and placed here? They were all bolded instead of separated. I'm not sure seperation was correct, but bolding was not a typical thing in Wikipedia, since they were all names of bands, most of which are not in the Wikipedia yet, anyway. So, I divided them. I found the ONE real reference, in the external links section, an interview with David Byrne, about starting the label, and why. I'm really not up on record label Wiki work group rules. All the other "references" appear to be each artist's page with their albums from this label, all from the same one reference in external links. 
Finally, I think a shrunken version of the label's logo in an infobox would make the page look better. Input? --leahtwosaints (talk) 16:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: A lot of the outside links go to URLs on the Luaka Bop website that currently shoot you back to the label's main page. 24.233.254.29 (talk) 22:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: There are a number of links in the article that go to the wrong place.  Examples include: One of Jim White's releases was titled "Gimmie Five", but the Gimmie Five link goes to the wiki page for The Killjoy's album Gimmie Five, which is NOT the same album; Another is the album "No Such Place" which links to the wiki page for Peter Butt, who directed a film titled "No Such Place"... these are totally unrelated to the albums.  There are a number of links like that.  Whoever did the original page was a tad lazy.  I will try to fix as many as I can for now.  Bzzzing (talk) 03:33, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of incorrect links
Talk:LPL Financial

message: Company is definitely notable:
*http://news.google.com/news?client=safari&rls=en&q=%22LPL+Financial+Services%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&um=1&sa=N&tab=wn
*http://online.wsj.com/search/search_center.html
*http://query.nytimes.com/search/query?query=LPL+financial+services&srchst=nyt
--A. B. (talk)  20:41, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: A key facts section that contains a list of duplicate information from the infobox is being inserted into the article.  Is there any reason to keep the key facts section?  The editor adding the content is using an LPL IP address. Alanraywiki (talk) 21:56, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key facts 

message: Can some one tell me why this edit is considered Undue weight by  and how do I go about revert it back on the page with out starting an edit war ~ I feel a $450,000 fine from the second largest state in the united states  and several other states included in North American Securities Administrators Association  "the oldest international investor protection organization" pretty due weight ~
:==Legal Matters==
:On March 28, 2019, LPL Financial's subsidiary LPL Financial LLC, with out admitting or denying fact or conclusions consented to a fine of $450,000  by Texas State Securities Board for  violating section 7 of the Texas Securities Act.
~ Mitchellhobbs (talk) 23:57, April 11, 2019‎ (UTC)
: I have no idea. They don't give any specific reason why it's undue, so I'm going to restore it. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 02:05, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: We need additional sources. The court document alone isn't enough to warrant inclusion, which is why I noted it is WP:UNDUE. A $450,000 fine is not significant for a company with $4.2 billion under management. Meatsgains(talk) 15:34, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I will get additional sources ~ but $450,000 is not much for a company with $4.2 billion under management but to the other 75% population of the globe, it's more than most people make in a life time so I think the amount is noteworthy Mitchellhobbs (talk) 18:01, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

text:  Okay, the $26 million is more notable than the $450K fine with Texas. Rather than updating state-by-state, I'd recommend not singling out specific states given the length of the short article. Meatsgains(talk) 02:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

text: no problem ~ it's fun to research anyways ~ thanks User:Meatsgains Mitchellhobbs (talk) 02:31, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal 

message: This article depends on LPL sources too much. Not good. This could easily be deleted, so please find more sources. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 02:08, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: BullRangifer ~ look better? Mitchellhobbs (talk) 04:55, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes. Much better. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 05:42, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  LPL sourcing
Talk:Lowenstein Sandler

message: Does anybody know what "IP" stands for -- insolvency protection? or intellectual property? --Tomwsulcer (talk) 03:29, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing Sept 2009 
Talk:LOUD Audio

message: From a press release dated sometime Nov 2008:
:St. Louis based M.I. Distributor; U.S. Band and Orchestra Supplies Inc. acquires St. Louis Music and its divisions of Knilling, Austin and SLM MarketPlace from Loud Technologies Inc.
http://www.pro-music-news.com/html/01/e81120us.htm Weeb Dingle (talk) 06:25, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have both created a dedicated St. Louis Music article, and updated the Loud and Mackie articles appropriately. synthfiend (talk) 15:50, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  the update problem 

message: I am uncertain why user KH-1 felt the need to revert this article. I hoped to find discussion here but, alas.
At a glance, it seems that the information added 26 Jan 2018 does accurately update the status and naming conventions chosen by LOUD. I'm swamped by trivia at the moment, but hope to get around to research. Meantime, chatter here would be nice. Weeb Dingle (talk) 13:02, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no edit comment on this revert by . ~Kvng (talk) 14:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't recall my reasons for reverting. Feel free to re-add the information. -KH-1 (talk) 22:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  was reversion necessary? 

message: Info on the Austin brand held by SLM since 2001:
http://www.austingtr.com/guitars/
http://www.vintaxe.com/catalogs_pages/catalogs_japanese_austin_2001.php
(Actually, these Austins were never MIJ. MIK at the beginning, likely some MII, entirely MIC about 2005-2006. The name may have previously been held by another owner.)
Before Austin, SLM had a '90s budget line, but I can't recall the name.Weeb Dingle (talk) 16:28, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have created a St. Louis Music article, which makes mention of Austin Guitars, and would be an appropriate place for expanding any relevant information about the brand. synthfiend (talk) 15:48, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  bits that could be added
Talk:Loud Records

message: This label deserves and needs better representation here. It is, as the label of 36 chambers, plus many other important mid 90s hiphop releases, a big part of hiphop history responsible for numerous classics (shook ones pt 2 amongst them!). I would but don't have sources. Rayman60 (talk) 03:11, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion required
Talk:Thomas Brooke Sr.

message: How sad Wikipedia has become with all of the page deletions during the past year or so.  Just look at how many "red (dead)links" exist on the Page of Thomas Brooke Sr.  Too many critics constantly deleting other's work.  This is why I not longer contribute to Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.9.235.250 (talk) 20:44, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Loremo

message: There seems to be a huge gulf between them - with the LS being somewhat too slow to be acceptable in the modern world (20s 0-60 is similar to the borderline-dangerous, ancient VW polo I used to own - and I'd be disappointed paying that much money for that kind of performance, even if it WAS super efficient... plus, though such figures would be just about acceptable if you used it as a solo-occupant city car, it wouldn't even have the same flexibility and minimal load-hauling ability as the Polo's diminutive 33kW petrol motor. By the time you'd picked up 3 friends with a bag each, reaching 60 at all would require favourable conditions never mind getting there quickly or sustaining it uphill; whereas I was still able to get over 75mph with the suspension down on the stops)... and the GT having disappointing economy for a next-generation eco car (not much better than the now nearly 10 year old Lupo 3L, which developed just as much if not more power, in a heavier and boxier frame) going with it's massively improved performance and not often usable top speed (at which i doubt it would be too efficient any more). It strikes me as odd there's no middle ground between them.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.46.180.56 (talk) 19:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  are the figures for the two models accurate? 

message: Updated the available data based on the german article. Did not provide all the german quotes in this article since they are in german language.
Neozoon 22:37, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  updated page 

message: No Update on the company homepage / blog since 2009.
In a german local newspaper  see also 
the head of Loremo Thomas Zollhoefer says that the concept did not work out, the solution with the lifting of the frontpart is not useful. He talks now about creating hybrid city lorries instead. So we will not see it driving on the street--Neozoon 22:42, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loremo project seems to be over 

message: It's mostly in German and what I would call corporate BS without anything concrete. Still, maybe they'll stage a comeback? The renders on the site (and the original concept) are pretty cool.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.50.89.61 (talk) 23:37, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's talk of restructuring on the loremo.com website
Talk:Uniform fetish

message: I wish to merge this article with the list of uncommon fetishes, this a stub and not be notable; any objections.--HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 20:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am opposed to such a merge. Why would combining this into a larger list article make any more sense?  Unless the various articles in such lists are deeply interdependent, they should be split into multiple articles. Also, what do you mean by not notable? Uniform fetishism is a common occurrence. --Eyrian 20:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's also a stub with no sources. My mistake, it does have a source.--HoneymaneHeghlu meH QaQ jajvam 20:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because it's a stub doesn't mean it should be dropped into a big list. --Eyrian 21:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: oppose merge. Chris 05:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge to [[List of fetishes]]? 

message: The article, before it was converted to a redirect without any discussion, had two references.  Were there any points in the article not covered by these references?  If so, they should be properly flagged.--Taxwoman 21:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite. The article had a single external link to a gay uniform fetish website and an ambiguous ref to the "The Visual Dictionary of Sex". You can't ref a sex dictionary and then just write an entire article on the subject saying that it's sourced. Anything larger than a stub needs to have at least some inline citations. Otherwise I'm going to just reduce the article to a single sentance dicdef stub and then ask that additional additions be cited as is my right. NeoFreak 21:23, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is referenced
Talk:List of Interstate Highways in New York

message: Is this list missing Interstate 787?  25or6to4 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 14:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, added in. Good catch. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 14:55, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-787? 

message: This list is completely devoid of former Interstate Highways in New York, and this list should not be restricted to active routes. This issue was also brought up during this list's FLC and was one of the reasons why it failed. – TMF 21:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See WT:NYSR#A smorgasbord of topics, where I have basically echoed these concerns. – TMF 15:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention rationale
Talk:Longstreet Hotel, Casino, and RV Resort

message: Ooh, if I can find it, I have a picture of The Cow that lives at this casino. There's also some really fat ducks! I think I know where these photos are located, but I don't know how to upload these to the article. Apple8800 (talk) 18:03, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Cow!
Talk:Longs Drugs

message: There seems to be a lot of vandalism on this page. Is there any way they can be blocked from posting and constantly changing out the correct info?
--Estrill5766 00:07, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Level of vandalism 

message: Since CVS is currently converting many of the Longs Drugs stores to CVS/Pharmacy stores, this article needs to be updated to reflect this. I did a little updating of the intro somewhat to reflect this but I can see the article needs further updating. What needs to be done is the following:
* The language needs throughout needs reflect that CVS now fully owns the Longs Drugs chain.
* It needs more info on the conversion of Longs stores to CVS stores currently in progress.
-Cab88 (talk) 06:41, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating article on conversion of Longs to CVS name 

message: I recently came back from a vacation in Hawaii and am disappointed to read the horribly one-sided activist slant in this section of the Longs Drugs article. Although it is apparently a hot-button local issue, this kind of subjective rhetoric is inappropriate for a Wikipedia article. I will edit the section to better make it meet the site's standards. The contributor appears to be anti-CVS/Longs Drugs and it clouds his or her judgment in what was written.
67.58.151.216 (talk) 07:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Activist slant and poor writing on Hawaii Expansion 

message: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CVS_Health says "Longs Drugs is a retail pharmacy chain with approximately 40 drug stores throughout the state of Hawaii."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longs_Drugs says "Longs Drugs is an American chain with approximately 70 drugstores throughout the state of Hawaii and formerly in the Continental US."
Don't know which is right, but they can't both be right.  Please fix whichever is wrong.
47.139.46.239 (talk) 02:17, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy in number of Longs Drugs in Hawaii
Talk:Erythema multiforme

message: I'm not sure that having a photo of a naked child on a website is a good idea. Perhaps we could find an alternative?
:"We" could, I suppose. But since it is my "naked child" and I don't think it is in any way an exploitative photo, I'm putting it back up. It is a MUCH clearer image of the rash than the photo that currently accompanies the article. BTW, please sign and date your comments in the future.Estreya (talk) 16:21, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: note
Talk:Logic Programming Associates

message: I guess the long URL http://www.customer_service.trusted.secure.server.bestandmostsecureonlinebankinamerica.myfavoritebank.com.berghel.com/publications/micropro/micropro_ncc87.pdf was a reference to the
book Security on the Web, Volume 83 (Advances in Computers)
which is coauthored by Hal Berghel. See section 10.1.2.3 Anti-Spoofing
Measures. Unfortunately some people have already copied the long
URL into power point presentations what ever. So I have shortened it.
Jan Burse (talk) 14:39, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Loews Hotels

message: Large amounts of promotional detail (or written in the style of promotion) have been excised, leaving the essential facts. This included removing and retitling sections. I'm now going to remove the "problem" box, as the problem has been fixed. Tapered (talk) 23:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Revision

message: Lead: Loews Hotels is a luxury hospitality company that owns or operates 23 hotels in the United States and Canada
Article: Loews Hotels currently owns and/or operates 29726 hotels and resorts in the United States and Canada
I mean its possible it means the company owns 23 hotels and thousands of resorts, but I think that should be spelled out if that is the case. Are there a few main brand of hotels/resorts they own? They should be listed if possible. Sephiroth storm (talk) 11:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clear Contradiction
Talk:Lodge (company)

message: * http://www.restonlloyd.com/scripts/home?id=ctc05hrl&code=home&func=prnt_html&header=yes&option=home
--222.64.223.42 (talk) 09:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red links in the ''See also'' section are associated with the following....
Talk:Lockheed Shipbuilding and Construction Company

message: Your account of the history of LSCC speaks only of the original facility on Harbor Island.   Plant Two was opened at a later time,directly west of the LSCC site on the west side of the West Waterway in West Seattle.  The largest structure was the pipe shop where I worked while attending the UW.   There were also docks and drydocks at Plant Two. Uwcharliet (talk) 05:50, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of LSCC 