Template talk:Context

message: The link to the word "context" on this template just goes to a disambiguation page with a dicdef on it.  It's basically akin to saying "read the dictionary, you newbies, and learn what the word context means."  Until some Wikipedia:Context comes along that explains precisely why articles need context (this would be a very good idea), I'm going to remove the link.  --Ardonik.talk()* 19:57, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
:What about linking the word to Wikipedia:Make technical articles accessible? SalaSkan 18:05, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Context"

message: It might be useful to put a link to the Wikipedia:Guide to layout on the context template. Articles with the context tag often have a terrible layout and formatting. I think the guide is a better link than the Wikipedia:Manual of style because it is more concise. This way the authors of the articles may be able to do some of the work themselves, if they don't know how. What do you guys think? -- Kjkolb 07:25, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikipedia:Guide to layout link

message: The section inside the <noinclude> segment shows up when you use the  structure.  Is there a way to fix that? Also, using  doesn't categorize the article that it's applied to. The Literate Engineer 03:07, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, don't use  for it :) Stifle 17:46, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using subst:context, Noinclude 

message: This template is protected.  It needs a sort key added to the category link, so
:Category:Wikipedia maintenance templates
needs to change to
:
– Doug Bell talk•contrib 01:07, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Edit done. As for unprotecting it, that's not going to happen, as this is a high-risk template. howcheng  {chat} 07:19, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd argue that, as it is included on exactly 18 pages at this time. Thanks for sorting the edit, though. Stifle 16:12, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add category sort key 

message: IMHO this template looks awful, due to its use of changes in font sizes and its unnecessary line breaks. I also think some minor wording changes are warranted.  Here's an alternative I'd like to suggest:
To meet Wikipedia's quality standards and make it more accessible to a general audience, the introduction to this article may require cleanup.  The introduction provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter.  Please help Wikipedia by improving the introduction according to the guidelines laid out at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.You can discuss the issue on the talk page.
or this:
To meet Wikipedia's quality standards and make it more accessible to a general audience, the introduction to this article may require cleanup.  The introduction provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter.  Please help Wikipedia by improving the introduction according to the guidelines laid out at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.You can discuss the issue on the talk page.
for comparison, here's the current version:
To meet Wikipedia's quality standards and make it more accessible to a general audience, this article may require cleanup.The introduction to this article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter.Please help Wikipedia by improving the introduction according to the guidelines laid out at Wikipedia:Guide to layout. You can discuss the issue on the talk page.
<?pre>
Thanks.  69.3.70.28 22:17, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really see why. The linebreaks clearly separate the concept of cleanup and needing more context. Stifle (talk) 00:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay, done. The template was protected because it's heavily used; see Wikipedia:High-risk templates. I'm not familiar with this procedure. If you think that it should be unlocked, you can try to request unprotection at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 04:57, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simplifications needed 

message: As mentioned on Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup, the code
<includeonly>[[Category:Wikipedia articles needing context]]</includeonly>
should be replaced with
<includeonly>{{{category|[[Category:Wikipedia articles needing context]]}}}</includeonly>
so that the template can be used on instruction pages without putting the instruction page into the category.
Also, the "See also" list for this template includes  itself. Kickaha Ota 14:38, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done--Commander Keane 17:10, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Done in a moment. – Luna Santin (talk) 06:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two minor edits needed 

message: <div class="messagebox cleanup metadata plainlinks">
{| style="width:100%;background:none"
|width=60px|[[Image:Information_icon.svg|40px]]
|The introduction to this article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter.<br />
<small>Please help [{{SERVER}}{{localurl:{{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}|action=edit}} improve the introduction]
to meet Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Guide to layout|layout standards]]. You can discuss the issue on the
[[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|talk page]].</small>
|}</div><includeonly>{{{category|[[Category:Wikipedia articles needing context]]}}}</includeonly><noinclude>
----
This template will categorise tagged articles into [[:Category:Wikipedia articles needing context]].
* This [[Wikipedia:Template|template]] is a [[Wikipedia:Avoid self-references|self-reference]].
* Please do not [[Wikipedia:Subst|subst:]] this template.
==See also==
* [[Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup]]
[[Category:Wikipedia maintenance templates|{{PAGENAME}}]]
</noinclude>

Which looks like this:


	The introduction to this article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter.Please help [ improve the introduction] to meet Wikipedia's layout standards. You can discuss the issue on the talk page.
Category:Wikipedia articles needing context
----
This template will categorise tagged articles into :Category:Wikipedia articles needing context.
* This template is a self-reference.
* Please do not subst: this template.
==See also==
* Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup

-- PatrickFisher 18:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I made the proposed wording/linking changes, but I did not add the icon, which doesn't have consensus.  See below.  Thanks, Renesis (talk) 23:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed edit 

message: Can you explain why it should be changed? In particular, why do you want to introduce an icon? The template already grabs the reader's attention. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 08:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. These messages have to attract the attention of editors without distracting readers from the article. I think on balance it's better now than it would be with a picture in it – Gurch 14:32, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments on proposed version 

message: I'm curious why this template limits the lack of context problem to introductions. I've encountered various articles in WP that entirely lack context. Also, many shorter articles don't exactly have introductions. Would it be OK just to change the template to say "this article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter"? BuddingJournalist 07:55, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed there should be a field to specify an alternative to where it currently says "The introduction to this article". Either "This article" or "This section" would be appropriate alternatives. __meco (talk) 16:50, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why limit to introduction? 

message: Please remove  from see also as it is deprecated. – Tivedshambo (talk) 20:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, Garion96 (talk) 23:02, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See also

message: Ok - the category that the articles with this template go into is ambiguous - and since I've seen this template used like this - I'd like to create a parameter so that we can change "article" to (I'm pretty sure this is the right format - haven't had to do this for a while) "article" --danielfolsom 02:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a little confused. Do you want the category text editable (i.e., Category:Wikipedia articles needing context) or the text of the actual box (i.e., introduction to this article provides)? Currently, the category can be specified using the category= parameter. Cheers. --MZMcBride 03:42, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 04:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative

message: please remove the Template:Not verified and Template:Unsourced from the see also section as they redirect to other listed templates.  additionally please use Wikipedia:Transclusion for the non-template content of this template. Jeepday (talk) 14:25, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 16:24, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: General Clean up

message: I think :Category:Cleanup_templates should be added to this template. I couldn't find it, and having it in that category would help. —ScouterSig 00:38, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  +Cat 

message: If this template is date tagged (e.g. {context|November 2007}), the word "article" is replaced with the specified date so that the text displayed reads The introduction to this November 2007 provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. I assume that this is a bug, and that the dated text should read either ...this article from November 2007... or ...this November 2007 article ... see Buenos Aires Football Club and Embraer MFT-LF. Random inspection of appropriate categories suggests that most instances of this template remain untagged, so the problem is not particularly noticeable.
--Romney yw (talk) 03:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor bug in template? 

message: 
Add an optional date field so that  is possible.
Find:
]].</small>
Replace with:
]]. </small>
Done! Gary King (talk) 15:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --- RockMFR 17:04, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add the date 

message: My impression is that this template should go on talk pages, not on main pages. It is not a message to readers, but rather a request to editors. Right? Sam (talk) 14:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not really. There's pretty thorough consensus that content-type cleanup templates still belong on articlespace. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this go on talk pages? 

message: Requesting sync with the new sandbox to bring this template in line with the styling used on other modern ambox templates. No content changes, just tweaks to the styling. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:39, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I think there is possibly too much bold in the proposed version. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you compare it to the  in the documentation section, it's roughly the same amount of text. Bolding the entire verb clause consistently seems like a good idea to me. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 13:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I don't think it's really a big change. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:21, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style tweaks 

message: Please add |All pages needing cleanup to . Compare e.g. Template:Bio-context. Debresser (talk) 15:22, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:04, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks. Debresser (talk) 13:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request 

message: In practice, this template is used not only for articles where the lede isn't clear enough but also where that applies to the article as a whole. I reckon the words "the introduction to" should be removed. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 07:29, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now pushed this change. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 18:53, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "introduction", again 

message: The second sentence of this template message currently reads "Please help improve the article with a good introductory style". I'd like to replace that with something like "Please help improve the article by providing more context for the reader" (I've made this change in the sandbox). I'm open to suggestions for alternative wording, but I think  is a more appropriate section to link to than  (especially when this template is used to tag a section rather than a whole article). Colin M (talk) 21:17, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:00, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to change "good introductory style" link 

message: If the template is placed inside a Multiple Issues tag, the message entered in the Details parameter is no longer displayed. This is in contrast to the Expert needed tag, which does continue to display the reasons.
I think it's important for this to display, as it gives passing editors an idea of whether they can fix the problem.
I've just had to partially undo a bot edit because of this, and include an HTML comment about it as well.
Musiconeologist (talk) 18:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: "Details" doesn't display when used with Multiple Issues tag