lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Robyn

message: "It was deleted from British stores " Would someone like to explain how you delete a physical cd? Also, it should be shop not store, because we are not in bloody America...... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.72.146 (talk) 17:31, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006-2008: International comeback 

message: I added two links to the article section, external links, but those have been removed several times, why, I don't know, I can't see any reason to remove these good links.
So I link to those sites here instead, if they will be removed again from the article.
There is a Robyn fansite with a lot of information about the swedish pop-princess at: Robyn Fanzone
There's also a forum with the latest news and the hottest stuff at
Robyn Forum.
Peace & Love
If you notice that the links to those sites doesn't appear on the article site, please help me and report it to wikipeda, cause then someONE has removed them. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.112.117.164 (talk) 22:18, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to Robyn sites 

message: In the personal life section, it currently reads: "She and Vitali separated for a period of time following the release of Body Talk, but had reconciled by 2018." But Body Talk had came out in 2010, while she was still engaged to her earlier partner. The line this is pulling from in the article was simply saying that if she had kept with her work rate, she would've been on Body Talk 60 by the time of the article's release.
"Had Robyn maintained that work rate – three releases every five months – Body Talk 60 would now be on the way. Clearly, that is unsustainable. Even so, she did not intend to wait so long before releasing another album, but then her long-term relationship with film-maker Max Vitali fell apart, her friend Christian Falk died, and grief forced her into a period of contemplation that would transform her approach to making music."
Essentially, this part is technically correct, as 2014 seems to be when they first separated (based on a quote later in the article) and 2014 is after Body Talk was released, but that's a four year difference so it feels odd to use that album as the signifier of time, at least, in my opinion, but maybe that's just my own personal misgivings with it. Wallflowerinbloom (talk) 13:38, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal Life clarification 

message: In case her appearance is worth mentioning somewhere:
* You Don't Know Me (RuPaul's Drag Race)
---Another Believer (Talk) 03:02, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guest appearance on ''Drag Race''
Talk:Diethyltryptamine

message: Can someone convert my external links into references? Thanks in advance. --Astavats (talk) 05:34, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help? 

message: :I am reassessing this article to Start-class per request on Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology/Assessment.
This article still needs a bit of work, especially in the way of expansion, before it can be assessed as B-class. It can, however, get some improvements right now that will make it a great Start-class article and help build the groundwork for B-class and GA:
#Expand a bit on the lead. Many people will not know DMT is orally inactive and why; jumping straight into "active orally [...] without the aid of MAO inhibitors" may alienate the general audience a bit;
#Please add a non-breaking space between numbers and units of measurement (WP:MOSNUM), and remember to italicize scientific names (MoS:T).
#The references should, ideally, be moved into footnotes. Diberri's excellent citation builder can help you with formatting. If you don't want footnotes, you could also use the author-date system, but full references listed at the end of the article are a must!
#Please capitalize none but the first word in a heading title, unless there are proper nouns in it.
Overall, this article can no longer be considered a stub, but there's still a bit of a way to go before it can reach B-class and GA. Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 10:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the break down, I'll get to fixing/adding as soon as I get time.--Astavats (talk) 12:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment

message: claims it is orally active, whereas http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=WuA4LsWXXWEC says not eg deep google, also 
It's worth noting that Dipropyltryptamine is marked as orally inactive. Imgaril (talk) 00:11, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Orally active
Talk:4-HO-DET

message: I think we should change this article from being called 4-HO-DET to it's easier to remember name: Ethocin
The name was taken from here: http://www.erowid.org/chemicals/4_acetoxy_det/4_acetoxy_det_article1.shtml
as well as change the following:
4-HO-DMT		to Psilocin.
4-phosphoryloxy-DMT	to Psilacetin.
4-AcO-DMT		to Psilocybin.
4-HO-DET		to Ethocin.
4-phosphoryloxy-DET	to Ethacetin.
4-AcO-DET		to Ethocybin.
4-HO-DIPT		to Iprocin.
4-phosphoryloxy-DIPT	to Ipracetin.
4-AcO-DIPT		to Iprocybin.
4-HO-MITP		to Miprocin.
4-phosphoryloxy-MITP	to Mipracetin.
4-AcO-MITP		to Miprocybin.
: It seems very premature to adopt the ethocin/ethacetin/ethocybin naming scheme since these names are not widely accepted and have never appeared in the scientific literature.  Furthermore, for most people this makes it less clear what chemical you are talking about since it is really obvious from the name what the chemical structure of "4-OH-DET" is.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psychopharmacology (talk • contribs) 09:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  change name of article
Talk:4-Acetoxy-DiPT

message: I've re-done the first sentence by adding "Ipracetin" which is stated by Erowid.org as alternative name, and deleting "4-Ace" which was unsourced, and could be applied to any of the "4-Acetoxy" tryptamines. I don't know if it would be necessary for "Ipracetin" to be cited with a reference, but feel free to add it with the link I've already provided.--Astavats 03:40, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article improvement(s) 

message: This article needs a new structure image--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 06:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, I just noticed the missing nitrogen. I can draw a new one if needed, but I don't know how to add/replace. Just a suggestion.--Astavats (talk) 00:08, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Replaced. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice, the new molecule looks clean, but the CAS number you added doesn't seem to be correct. It says "No term found." - take a look at it.--Astavats (talk) 01:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The CAS number is correct.  The database the link automatically goes to just doesn't have a record for every chemical compound with CAS number.  11:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

text:  Oh I see, never mind then.--Astavats (talk) 01:03, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a discussion going on about CAS over here. Making a link between the CAS number and MeSH to provide a page with no information seems of little value. Why do it?--ChemSpiderMan (talk) 14:55, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure image required 

message: I think the proper name for this compound would be 4-Acetoxy-DiPT. --Harbinary (talk) 08:07, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. And the article can't be moved to the correct spelling because it doesn't recognize the alternate capitalization as a separate page. =( Enix150 (talk) 11:36, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  It does recognize it as a different page, that's not the problem. The problem is that  has a non-trivial edit history. 70.24.248.23 (talk) 06:49, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article naming
Talk:4-AcO-DET

message: I think this should be merged with O-Acetylpsilocin.  I have placed the merger suggestion on the top of the page. Anirak1337 07:03, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a mistake, and I will correct it. The original states "known as ethacetin, ethylacybin or 4-AcO-DMT is a hallucinogenic tryptamine.", which is incorrect. It should be 4-AcO-DET. --Astavats 22:14, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Incorrect, 4-PO-DET would be ethocybin, and 4-AcO-DET is ethylacybin (Ref. #1) or following the more common standard nomenclature "ethacetin" (Ref. #2).--Astavats (talk) 08:23, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Most importantly, the previous title, 4-Acetoxy-DET does not follow Wikipedia's Concision guidelines (it is longer than necessary "to identify the topic to a person familiar with the general subject area".
In addition, it does not follow the following guidelines from the top five article title guidelines:
* Recognizability: those who are not experts in the field may recognize 4-AcO-DET but not 4-Acetoxy-DET
* Naturalness: people will search for 4-AcO-DET, not 4-Acetoxy-DET
* Consistency: by and large articles for acetylated tryptamines (4-AcO-DMT, 4-AcO-DPT, etc.) use "AcO", not "Acetoxy"
I will be going through the Cleaning up after a move checklist in the coming days. Thanks! Repylom (talk) 22:18, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change
Talk:Eastern Ye

message: Hi,
I'm puzzled as to why the character 濊 doesn't appear in the Wikisource text of the San guo zhi.  Unfortunately I don't have a fully authoritative text to compare it to; is this an error in Wikisource, or is there something more complex going on? -- Visviva 05:05, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The 濊 ("roiling, turbulent; clouded, muddied (as water)") character was not included in some of the earlier 16-bit font tables; it is therefore often substituted in electronic documents by 穢 ("dirty, unclean, filthy, polluted; immoral, obscene"), which shares the same pronunciations and might actually represent a cognate word. It is likely that the online text of San-guo-zhi also replaced the original character, 濊, with the more accessible but historically inaccurate character, 穢. Ebizur 04:12, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dongijeon on Wikisource
Talk:Vajirañāṇasaṃvara

message: Notes on authorship:
This article was written by Clay Collier, who is User:Spasemunki on Wikipedia. It originally appeared on Everything2 and appears here now with the permission of the author. It was edited a little by Clay and very slightly by myself before being published on Wikipedia. Here is the licensing information that Clay sent me in an e-mail:
:Copyright (c) 2003, 2005 Clay Collier.
:Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
- Nat Krause 07:43, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Daniel Pinchbeck

message: A disambiguation page should be added and linked to distinguish from Dan Pinchbeck, author of the videogame Dear Esther.  Dear Esther is an important game in the "art games" community, so I believe that (the other) Dan is sufficiently notable to merit his own page.
63.227.39.88 (talk) 20:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation page 
Talk:Saved!

message: I find the description of Hilary Faye a bit off. First there is no source for her being "racist" so please add one. Also fundamentalist is a hard word. You are really talking about her conservative values which stem from religion. The term fundamentalist is more often used to describe the Sola Stripture, earth in 6 days christian. Nothing in the movie showed that she was a fundamentalist. Oh yeah and when did she worship in the movie? I don't remember that part either. As for patrick being sweet, and whatever else, definitely one sided. Needs changing to be NPOV. Chooserr 07:18, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestions 

message: It seems to me that the criticisms in this talk page have been addressed in the current version of the article.  The "Analysis" section to which people have objected is not present.  The "Criticism" section appears to me to be perfectly appropriate: brief, representative, and sourced.  Is the neutrality of the article, in its present form, still disputed? Capedia 01:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed it and cleaned up the article as well. Berserkerz Crit 17:10, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still disputed? 

message: According to this article, Saved! had a budget of 5,000,000 and grossed 10,000,000, making it a money-doubling investment. That really doesn't sound too bad.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.234.73 (talk) 01:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess it's all a matter of how you look at it. It certainly wasn't a blockbuster by any means, but saying that it performed poorly without any cite does seem to be POV. I'm going to remove that part until someone provides a source that characterizes the box office performance as poor. Rreagan007 (talk) 20:16, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wait, how is this performing poorly? 

message: The section begins by citing the "mixed reviews" (60/40) from Rotten Tomatoes, but then goes on to include several sentences citing the most glowingly positive reviews and only one mediocre negative review. 67.233.238.6 (talk) 06:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undue weight in "Reception" section
Talk:Length (phonetics)

message: I'm copy pasting the following to this talk page. It was added to the section pointing out that in "certain languages, however, there are pairs of sounds that are traditionally considered to be long-short pairs of the same sound even though they really consist of different sounds":
"This is particular problematic when the speakers of such languages cannot hear the distinction, e.g. English /ou/ vs. /o/ or /o:/ in other languages."
-- j. 'mach' wust ˈæ̞wːæ̞ː 08:18, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Obscure passage

message: This begs the question: what does "longer" mean here?  Are we talking about duration, or something more subtle?  --Doradus (talk) 14:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Clicking through to other articles, it does seem that duration is the key.  I've reworded the opening sentence accordingly.  --Doradus (talk) 14:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular definition 

message: The article says this symbol, ː , is called a length sign. What do you call this one: ˑ ? A half-length sign? Could the name be added to the article? DBlomgren (talk) 17:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terms for these symbols:  ː and ˑ 

message: There needs to be more discussion about what that even means. /t/ is an an abrupt sound. Is /tː/ possible? Does it just indicate a trailing short vowel? Does it indicate that the preceding and succeeding syllable have separate enunciated /t/s? or what? See, e.g., Kuujjuaq which claims that the name has a /jː/. Is the "yyyyuh" stretched out? The "yuuuuuuh" stretched out? or is the sound simply repeated "...yeh-yuh..."? — LlywelynII 05:32, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Long consonants
Talk:Protected areas of Australia

message: Botanical gardens may not be protected areas according to the ICUN. Alan Liefting 08:50, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As of 2014, three protected areas within the Commonwealth jurisdiction described as "botanical gardens" are listed as IUCN category IV - please refer http://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/pages/d00ca066-1c8c-412a-9e16-2a37647454a7/files/capad2014com.xlsx.  Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 23:17, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Botanical gardens

message: Need to add Conservation parks to this article. I have set up some redlinks called Conservation park (Australia). -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 10:15, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Conservation park (Australia) to "See also" in this article as the link is relefant to several Australian jurisdictions and also needs to be located somewhere within the WP. regards Cowdy001 (talk) 22:56, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conservation parks 

message: Shouldn't this article have a section referring to this? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:56, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: National heritage list
Talk:Observance of Christmas by country

message: I was noticing a change to the Bahamas section and was about to revert, but I noticed the previous content was unsourced. I started looking and so much of the article is unsourced. Any suggestions on how to approach that? Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:23, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Some kind of collective mission to improve it? Do many already exist as stand alone articles? Irtapil (talk) 22:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  best approach to dealing with the large number of sections that are unsourced 

message: > On Christmas Day, people sometimes make big bonfires and dance around them to the playing of bagpipes. 
This is rubbish.  No-one in Scotland dances around bonfires playing bagpipes on Christmas day.  It's celebrated like pretty much the rest of the UK.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.31.138.162 (talk) 20:36, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed as you wish. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:02, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rubbish in Scottish section 

message: But spilt HOW? Cold make it a list and split off 200 sub pages? Irtapil (talk) 22:16, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The longer ones seem like they should have sub pages, partially for keyword search. Came here looking for "christmas in brazil" and took me forever to find this page. Slinkyco (talk) 00:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  spilt?
Talk:Sunset yellow

message: This page's contents should probably be placed under Sudan I and replaced with a redirect.  Sudan I should also get the product list and food-stub category.  If there is a reason it should be on a seperate page from Sudan I, it should be mentioned. 
Sunset Yellow is another name for the artificial food colouring Sudan I
Castlan 09:30, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I stay corrected. Article expanded and amended. --Shaddack 06:19, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?
Talk:Three (U2 EP)

message: Whoever made this page calls this an EP, but the band has referred to Out of Control as their first single, and that's the way I have always thought of it.  I don't know what exactly technically distinguishes an EP from a single, but I assume the reason it's called an EP is because the title is not of a particular song. Anyway, not a big deal, but food for thought. I tried to look up what it's classified as on their official site but it's down right now apparently or my internet isn't quite working. MDuchek (talk) 04:39, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: EP?
Talk:Wide Awake in America

message: "An alternative story from the 1985 Hot Press book "The U2 File" reported that 'A Sort of Homecoming' was rerecorded in the studio to be released as a follow up single to 'Pride.' Unfortunately the session did not go well and this plan was abandoned. The Hot Press journalist subsequently noted that the studio "single" version was in fact the version on WAIA with crowd noises overdubbed."
I'd like an author and page cite and corroborating verification, especially with this kind of wording. There's a little too much "the untold story of U2" about it.
U2 admits that the song was recorded live (during a soundcheck) at Wembley and mixed (with crowd noises dubbed in) at Good Earth Studios. Since "A Sort of Homecoming" had already been released on The Unforgettable Fire, I can't see how the single version would be different than the album version, except perhaps for time (album version 5:28).
While not live technically (no more than, say R.E.M.'s soundcheck songs on New Adventures in Hi-Fi or the "live" portion of Aerosmith's "Train Kept a-Rollin'" from Get Your Wings), it is a different version. Whether it merits note beyond what is already in the article is debatable. Fantailfan 13:23, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "A Sort of Homecoming" 'controversy' 
Talk:Original Soundtracks 1

message: I rated this as 'high' importance (the U2 project minimum for U2 studio albums) - but maybe that is too high. Merbabu 04:04, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added two more project stub thingys and rated them high also as it is U2 and an interesting side-project. ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 17:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The cover of the album "Original soundtrack" is work of Czech graphic designer Teodor Rotrekl (cs:Teodor Rotrekl). See http://www.galeriebrno.cz/rotrekl_knizni_ilustrace.pdf page 9 (for the picture) an 12 (for the text in english). --Thomazzo (talk) 17:21, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover 

message: I think the Slug clip is fine as long as it has a well-written rational, which it does.  I meant that it wouldn't qualify per WP:NFC without a well-written rationale for this article, especially no rational at all. –Dream out loud (talk) 20:15, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It was something that I just forgot to add to the file page when I put it in there originally. My mind has been somewhat distracted as of late... Melicans (talk, contributions) 20:17, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slug clip 

message: There's a line in this article that says:
"Bono objected to Mullen's statement in the same documentary..."
But as far as I can tell there is no prior reference to any documentary. Will the author of this passage please clear this up???!!!???
Ergonaut2001 (talk) 01:20, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Documentary?
Category talk:Mining companies

message: Should this category also contain defunct mining companies, such as the UMHK, or should these be placed in a seperate sub-category, such as :Category:Defunct mining companies? — Itai (f&t) 09:53, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: UMHK is not really defunct insofar as mining operations are continuing at the deposits it worked; the company there now is carrying on where UMHK once worked.  There are many defunct mining companies that worked deposits that are now depleted, or that do not have as important a history as UMHK. --McTrixie 13:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments
Talk:Melon: Remixes for Propaganda

message: all the names of the "fruitlegs" apple banana lime etc are all linked to pages that describe them as plants, I know what an apple is already, I would like to know what the apple album is about, going to disambiguation doesnt help, if they dont link to articles covering the albums themselves i dont see much point in having a huge list of fruits there, and certainly not having them linked
any thoughts anyone?
Xtiaaneubaten (talk) 12:50, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Apple, banana, lime...