Talk:Satellite temperature measurement

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Satellite temperature measurements. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070203081058/http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap1-1/finalreport/default.htm to http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap1-1/finalreport/default.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070323005914/http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/MSU/msusci.html to http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/MSU/msusci.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: G updated the RSS . I think that corresponds to http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0768.1, which is worth mentioning of itself (see-also https://www.carbonbrief.org/major-correction-to-satellite-data-shows-140-faster-warming-since-1998). Thanks C William M. Connolley (talk) 14:39, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That edit changes .135 to .184. But the journal ref provided above says .134 increased to .174. " The changes result in global-scale warming (global trend (70S-80N, 1979-2016) = 0.174 C/decade), ~30% larger than our previous version of the dataset (global trend, (70S-80N, 1979-2016) = 0.134C/decade)" Perhaps the .135 and .184 figures include Jan 2017? Do we have a ref for the .184 figure? If not, should it be changed to .174 per journal ref or is that for a different period or coverage or something? https://web.archive.org/web/20170120235652/http://www.remss.com/measurements/upper-air-temperature shows .135 to Dec 16 and https://web.archive.org/web/20170302132317/http://www.remss.com/measurements/upper-air-temperature also shows .135 for period to Feb 17 so .01 diff in trend for one month between that 2 month gap seems unlikely. crandles (talk) 15:05, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: http://images.remss.com/msu/msu_time_series.html shows .184 but this may include up to May 2017 but is 70S to 82.5N as opposed to journal article referring to 70S to 80N. crandles (talk) 15:27, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  RSS rev 4 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Satellite temperature measurements. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121123040542/http://www.ssmi.com/msu/msu_data_description.html to http://www.ssmi.com/msu/msu_data_description.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110112044011/http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/060.htm to http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar/wg1/060.htm
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130104194031/http://spacescience.spaceref.com/newhome/headlines/notebook/essd13aug98_1.htm to http://spacescience.spaceref.com/newhome/headlines/notebook/essd13aug98_1.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060222024828/http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/overview/microwave.html to http://www.ghcc.msfc.nasa.gov/overview/microwave.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:35, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Thinking it over, my thought is now that we should cut the MSU material here to just an introductory overview, and put all of the details and discussion of trends into the MSU temperature measurements  article.  This will serve the purpose of the merge (not having the same material duplicated across multiple articles), and also will mean that this article is not unbalanced with too much material on the MSU, and comparatively little on other satellite temperature measurements.Skepticalgiraffe (talk) 21:47, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds reasonable! Jlevi (talk) 14:23, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Withdrawing merge proposal