lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stepanakert

message: <S>The city is an internationally recognised part of Azerbaijan. It is Azerbaijan's right to determine the name of the city and international law allows them to do so. I saw other users brought this up and some high-rank editors silenced them by blocking the user and closing the topic. You may like it or not based on your worldview. But if we accept that this world should have some sort of law, we should respect it even if we don't like the outcome. This is not a responsible behaviour by Wikipedia. I request the editors to respect the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan and international law. Yalancinin (talk) 17:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: "It is Azerbaijan's right to determine the name of the city" What term Azerbaijan uses to refer to the occupied city is irrelevant. The guideline here is Use commonly recognizable names: "Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it generally prefers the name that is most commonly used (as determined by its prevalence in a significant majority of independent, reliable, English-language sources)". In other words, we should not care about what Azerbaijan does. Dimadick (talk) 23:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You will have to propose that Wikipedia follow UN resolutions at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy), although I caution against optimism on the proposal's success. CMD (talk) 01:31, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The official name of a city is not a matter of voting in Wiki 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: speedy close. The previous discussion ended only a few weeks ago. It did not find support for the move proposed here, and due to the repeated initiation of such requests, the administrator closing the previous discussion imposed a six-month moratorium. If the situation has changed at some point after the expiration of this moratorium, please note that evidence should be presented arguing how the new title is appropriate in terms of such Wikipedia rules as WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NAMECHANGES; common usage in English does not necessarily reflect the decisions of governments.  Dekimasuよ! 13:22, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Stepanakert →  – The city is internationally recognized Azerbaijani territory. The city is also under Azerbaizani control now. Khankendi is the offical Azerbaizani name of the city. Nafis Fuad Ayon (talk) 12:33, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 February 2024
Talk:Waste container

message: Wheelie bin is essentially a freestanding fork of this article and I believe this article would be improved by merging it here. Thoughts? Beeblebrox (talk) 00:29, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: . I also merged "Wheelie bin urinal" as it was only a paragraph. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:58, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger 

message: There should be an article on the history of the garbage can. 63.3.2.130 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:22, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garbage Can History 

message: "Bin" is a fanny pack - an idiom with conflicting meanings elsewhere.  It shouldn't be used colloquially throughout the article.  Since there seems to be no shared informal word for trash can, I propose "garbage bin" - as it makes it clear to all users of English.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.62.117.228 (talk) 22:20, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bin" is a bad term, use "Garbage bin".  

message: Common terms are dustbin, rubbish bin, litter bin, garbage can, trash can, trash bin, wheelie bin, dumpster, waste basket, waste paper basket, waste receptacle, container bin, bin, kitchen bin, barrel and trash barrel" Come on guys this is ridiculous. There should only be 1-4 different names that we list as alternative common names to a trash can, not 16. I am removing some as this is ridiculous. Boilingorangejuice (talk) 04:02, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Over board on the slang used for this item

message: <<Some common terms are dustbin, garbage can, trash can and dumpster.>>
I've removed "dumpster", as a dumpster is a different thing from what gets referred to as a "trash can", "garbage can" or "dustbin". 2602:306:3653:8440:29F3:60F9:8AE8:F2EA (talk) 01:30, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Dumpster

message: I came here on a redirect from Wheelie Bin and this article is useless for that enquiry;  maybe someone knowledgeable could create an article on Wheelie Bins, since they are so distinct from old-fashioned metal Dustbins  ( and are used in 82% of Britain ).  All I know is they were invented in Germany. Claverhouse (talk) 16:30, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wheelie Bin Article Needed 

message: In the "See also" section, there is a link to Pedal bin, which redirects back to this very article. That link is unnecessary. 178.148.87.73 (talk) 22:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done — see Special:Diff/1012726726. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 00:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article links to itself 

message: Please change link [4] from the broken
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/38-39/55/part/III/crossheading/scavenging-and-cleansing/enacted
to the currently live
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/38-39/55/section/45/enacted PokerMagnate (talk) 11:48, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --Mvqr (talk) 13:18, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 April 2023
Talk:Ludmilla Tourischeva

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 13:33, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: JukoFF (talk) 01:11, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Free

message: This article has a section which reads:
Eponymous skills
Vault: Tsukahara tucked (4.0)
"Eponymous" means "named after the person in question." The author of the section must have misread Tsukahara as Tourischeva. The statement in the article is not backed up by any citation, meaning that someone should remove the section in its entirety, before it becomes some sort of Internet "fact." Speaking of which, I think I will do the removal myself.--71.36.113.60 (talk) 03:41, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are right. Thank you for spotting this and dealing with it. LynwoodF (talk) 07:59, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Eponymous skills

message: Shouldn't the correct anglosaxon transliteration be Tourishcheva (Cyrillic: Тури́щева, scientific transliteration Turiščeva)? -- SERGIO aka the Black Cat 23:09, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourishcheva
Talk:Earl of Perth

message: Has the 18th Earl of Perth a son? His eldest one would have the courtesy title Viscount Strathallan. I have found no children of the 18th earl. --VM 18:48, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Often, those who claimed the title after the attainder but before its reversal are excluded from the numbering. However, such persons are, because the attainder was completely reversed, technically Earls of Perth, and therefore are here included in the numbering."
I have removed as this is not correct. Reversal of attainder has no impact on intermediate heirs. They are not deemed in law to have held or been capable of holding any title under attainder. The writer may be confusing dormantcy where later recognition does retrospectively number all previous 'holders'. Alci12 13:38, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did smile but I have a slight concern. Burkes Cockaynes and Cracrofts disagree here 2-1 in favour of what we would expect. It could be just error but  I would like to know why Alci12 15:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd trust Cracroft's over Burke's or the CP any day. (And Burke's just slavishly copies the CP anyway, even in its obvious errors like the territorial designation business, so they can't really be called two separate sources.) Proteus (Talk) 16:16, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

text:  Well when we do renumber, do you think we should break out the 'dukedom' to a jacobite peerage entry on its own. As this mixing of genuine and assumed titles is probably not helpful.Alci12 16:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely. (I've already had to move a couple of Jacobite Dukes to their legally recognised titles.) Proteus (Talk) 16:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I must get a hang of this be bold concept and just edit!Alci12 23:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And yet, this article is still ridiculous.  What's the deal with all the "de jure" earls?  They were not de jure earls.  A de jure peer is one who was entitled to a peerage but was never recognized as such due to the title being dormant.  As, for instance, the various de jure earls of Devon between 1556 and 1831.  There were no de jure earls of Perth because the title was forfeit.  This article is a hopeless mess. john k (talk) 16:57, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The numbering depends on whether or not you are a Jacobite.  Following 1716, according to the Hanoverians, they were not earls at all, but for being raised to the Dukedom, they would have continued calling themselves earls, but the appropriates description is "titular" not "de jure".  I have slightly added to the article in a way that I hope deals with.  I raised this issue in relation to another Jacobite title, as to how to handle the matter in succession boxes.  It was suggested to me that "s-tul" should be used instead of "s-ttl", and this seemed to work well.  Peterkingiron (talk) 18:58, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attainder 

message: :
And who or what are these Menteiths?  The earls of Menteith, or something else? —Tamfang (talk) 00:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Menteiths
Talk:Vantaa

message: It is a common debate in Finland whether Vantaa has access to the sea or not. I have looked at the maps and have found that the answer is yes. There is a very narrow bay to the east of Helsinki and part of the northern shore of this bay belongs to Vantaa. Vantaa does not have access to the sea anywhere else.  — JIP | Talk 18:52, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What kind of photographs exactly are requested? —Ppntori 23:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photographs

message: Is it necessary to mention Mika Salo so soon in the article? He's a famous guy, but not that famous. 62.240.89.223 (talk) 22:54, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mika Salo

message: Valtteri Filppula is less famous than Mika Salo so he shouldn't be mentioned at the begining. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.71.201 (talk) 15:43, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valtteri Filppula  

message: I was thinking that the demographic evolution table should probably be horizontal and all the photo's put into a gallary section? Govvy (talk) 15:31, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demographic evolution and photos 

message: I have fixed an anachronism in the article. King Magnus II of Sweden could not have granted salmon fishing rights in Vantaa in 1351 as he died two centuries before that. Apparently the correct king was Magnus IV of Sweden. JIP | Talk 22:47, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently information of Magnus II of Sweden was added in this edit by User:SimoM almost eighteen and a half years ago. It's a good thing this anachronism was finally discovered. I don't think it's worth notifying SimoM as he has not edited Wikipedia in thirteen years. JIP | Talk 23:06, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anachronism fixed
Talk:Tày people

message: The description sounds like crap.  How can an ethnic group be "formed"? DHN 18:59, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A lot of people who got classified as Tay are actually Tay-ized Annamite. These Annamite migrated from Nghe An, Nam Dinh, etc. to the border area to serve as governmental officials and ironically Tusi chieftains. They were assigned large tracts of lands in provincial towns along the Sino-Annamite borders and were forbidden to return back to their home areas. Today, there are a lot of the people who get classified as the Tay bear Annamite surnames, e.g. Nguyễn Đình, Nguyễn Khắc, Nguyễn Công. Gustmeister (talk) 14:06, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tay-ized Vietnamese among the Tay 

message: Hello 2001:EE0:D780:58A0:7DB8:B5B4:4A31:C7C3 (talk) 22:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hello
Talk:Whitelist

message: I'm not sure about the above-described move from Whitelist to Whitelisting. Looking at the content, the opposite subject is Blacklist (computing), not Blacklisting. GregorB (talk) 17:37, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) NW1223<Howl at me•My hunts> 01:10, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Whitelisting →  – Wrong name, article is about "whitelist" not about "whitelisting". Eurohunter (talk) 12:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 April 2022 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved and WP:SNOW closed (non-admin closure) :3 F4U (they/it) 07:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Whitelist →  – Wikipedia provides some influence on the usage of terms, and as other companies stated to move away from the controversial terms, I think the article title should be a non-controversial, like allowlist, and the controversial whitelist term be mentioned in the article. Also, check the other discussion in Talk:Blacklist (computing)#BlackList Controversy. — Arthurfragoso (talk) 20:24, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 July 2023
Talk:Red Rock Casino, Resort & Spa

message: This article was nominated for deletion on 2005 March 17.  The outcome was keep. See also Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Red Rock Resort Spa and Casino. – ABCD 19:04, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: From VFD

message: Please note that Heather (Hell's Kitchen) does not know which restaurant she will be working at.  --Madchester 23:41, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Heather's restaurant

message: I have moved the article to "Red Rock Casino, Resort & Spa". That's the name used by the Wall Street Journal, USA Today (sans comma), Los Angeles Daily News (sans comma) and Vegas Magazine. "Red Rock Resort" apparently only sees local use. Huon (talk) 02:06, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: what are the history behind the hard rock hotel 24.111.190.230 (talk) 11:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hard rock hotel
Talk:Ricky Gervais

message: It is a bit odd to include past tour dates so prominently on the Wiki. It is not going to be interesting to anyone in the future. It makes more sense to say he visited those places in a tour, in a sentence describing it. Rather than its own table.Perennial Student (talk) 10:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that it's odd to have a list of dates for one tour only in this table and to not mention any other tours. It would be better to do as you've suggested and also re-title the DVD/Netflix table as the tours table, so that it's easy to find the info, rather than having to read through the article text to find them. --IndigoBeach (talk) 11:46, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: As the single table of dates is both out of place well out of date, I'm going to roll the filmed shows table into the Filmography section as has been done with Chapelle and remove the Stand-up tours section. --VariousDeliciousCheeses (talk) 15:32, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tour dates?
Talk:Dr. Elsa Schneider

message: What's the point of this article if all it does is retell Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade#Plot Summary?  This also appears to be a recreation of Elsa Schneider.  If there's no objections (again), I'll redirect it (again). --Mrwojo 19:35, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I echo the comments above. This article seems to have little value. --Dunstan 16:43, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Taqwa

message: Please observe Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view in this article. It's important to maintain impartial neutrality to the subject matter and not editorialize the content. --Kickstart70-T-C 04:55, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: The tone of this article is largely that of Qur'anic exegesis, which is inappropriate for Wikipedia. If anyone feels like pointing their keyboards at this article, it'd be great. Ogress smash! 02:44, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  That whole section was entirely non-WP and unreferenced, so I just removed it.  I left the basic definition and the etymology (gave it its own section), and I wouldn't mind seeing some neutral academic perspectives on the term.  But as it stood it was basically just a khutbah on a religious term, which is not what WP is for. MatthewVanitas (talk) 08:36, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exegesis 

message: I removed this part and I have rewritten the ending part of the the first sections, because not all Muslims understand God as an "entity" that expresses man like emotions such as anger, hatred...etc 95.223.187.171 (talk) 05:02, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actions that make Allah angry 

message: Is this cognate with Hebrew *tiqwa*? Drsruli (talk) 22:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cognates
Talk:Urochrome

message: Is this the same thing as urobilin? —Keenan Pepper 05:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. This page says, "Urochrome was the original name given to the pigment thought to give urine its color. It is now known that several related pigments are responsible, so the original name has been dropped. Urine is yellow because of urobilins, specifically d-urobilin, i-urobilin, l- stercobilin, and possibly others. Urobilins are composed of four modified pyrrole rings connected by methylene bridges." Not sure if the article needs to be updated or if the link is wrong. -GilbertoSilvaFan 01:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Urobilin comparison

message: Why when you take vitimins your urine is yellow after that. can the body not get rid of the hemoglobin by itself? -Unknown
:I'm guessing that perhaps some excess vitamins may also have colouring effects on the urine. Not sure. Tyciol 10:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vitamin effect
Talk:Acetone peroxide

message: I really have to question if this has any place on wikipedia. Surely it's the weapon of choice by islamic terrorists. Is there no sense of collective responsibility about the level of detail on this posting? Billy K (talk) 18:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tatp 

message: Referenced on CBS tv show FBI international February 21 , 2023 in reference to a car bomb 2601:98B:8001:6130:FD1C:1BE7:A9BD:8656 (talk) 02:50, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  TATP referenced
Talk:Rilo Kiley

message: I seem to remember that it's impossible to read anything in a dream, because you're left brain isn't active enough. I don't know if that's true or not, but if it is, I guess it shoots down that story. B.Mearns*, KSC 19:12, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name from a dream 

message: Could someone please add a little more info about this band? The whole article is pretty much just name speculation... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 4.226.249.31 (talk) 05:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Info 

message: One of their tracks (After Hours) was played in Science Of Sleep. Don't know how to reference this or anything. -- Lionfish
Ah, this band is pretttyyy good.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.93.28.130 (talk) 14:46, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't know how to insert 

message: It says they're signed to saddle creek. Wasn't Under the Blacklight released under Warners?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.70.249.222 (talk) 19:28, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Label 

message: This statement is sourced with an interview of Jenny Lewis new band Jenny and Johnny.  But no where in the interview is there a suggestion that Rilo Kiley currently has no plans to make future recordings.  I believe this should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.115.2.175 (talk) 20:13, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currently no plans to make further recording 
Talk:Raja Rao

message: I have removed its stub status and added sections and categories. Capitalistroadster 19:34, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub notice

message: For those who wondered why I only added the title of the stories collected in The Cow in the Barricades and Others Stories and The Policeman and the Rose in my latest modification, know that On the Ganga Ghat features numbered chapters—thus no proper titles—and is meant to be read in sequence like a novel, as stated explicitly by the author in his brief foreword.• H☼ωdΘesI†fl∉∈ {TALK} • 15:38, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''On the Ganga Ghat'' contents
Template talk:MultiLicenseImagePD

message: The only difference (as I type this) between this licensing statement and :Template:MultiLicensePD are the words "and image" in the first sentence (plus, I've simplified the table code a bit). - dcljr 20:48, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose of this template

message: Because it's actually legally impossible to grant one's own works into the public domain in the U.S. and U.K., and this creates serious potential legal problems, I will deprecate this tag if there is no dissent for 4 days. Please see Wikipedia:You can't grant your work into the public domain for a full explanation along with some authoritative sources, including the U.S. Copyright Office. I have created the tags  and , which together reflect the intent of this template. Deco 03:33, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please ignore the above. This template has not been retired and there was considerable dissent over the accuracy of my statements. I no longer contend that it is impossible to release one's works into the public domain - I am not a lawyer and there is no legal precedent in this matter. The link above should redirect to relevent discussion. Deco 05:34, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retiring