Talk:Alhambra Decree

message: Seems like the first paragraph digresses greatly from the purpose of the article. I would like to see most of it removed and stick to the purpose of the page which is to describe the Alhambra Decree, not the revocation of it, and the insignificant attempts of the responsible parties to apologize. Almost seems like an advertisement for Catholicism. Definitely written by a Catholic apologist at least. I am asking for a neutral party to consider cleaning it up a bit. Or moving some of it to the bottom of the article because being at the top seems to steer the reader in a certain unnatural direction. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.114.16.212 (talk) 23:41, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Excuses

message: Should the text of the Alhambra decree be moved to Wikisource? -PoptartKing
:This is not the text of the Alhambra decree, it is a translation.  I dunno if that's acceptable on Wikisource...admittedly tho, I don't know basically anything about Wikisource.  Tomer TALK 03:30, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)
:If it makes any difference, I went through last night and added wikilinks to all the relevant words in the text of translation of the Decree, whereupon IE6 (thank you Bill Gates) crashed b4 my <save> transaction was completed. :-(  Tomer TALK 03:32, Apr 19, 2005 (UTC)
:: Who translated it?  Or was it an automated translation?  Automated translations are probably not sufficiently accurate for a work of encyclopædic scope such as this.  38.100.34.2 22:33, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wikisource

message: I've at times found the Alhambra Decree cited in various works as not only an expulsion of Jews but also Muslims.  Was there a separate decree for Muslims, or should this information also be included in this article? ---Trippz (talk) 07:30, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the text.  It says nothing at all about Moslems.  -- Zsero (talk) 07:51, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I saw that.  However, my question was because some sources I've come across ref the Alhambra Decree as also directed toward Muslims.  Either the ref is in error, or perhaps there is a separate decree issued in regard to Muslims also called the Alhambra Decree, or the text provided is incomplete or a truncated version directed solely towards Jews.  Just seeking clarification.  --Trippz (talk) 12:44, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is the text of the decree.  That's all there was.  Therefore any sources that claim otherwise are wrong.  -- Zsero (talk) 19:18, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, my mistake.  The ref I mentioned does seem to be in error, or I read it wrong.  Either way further research indicates 1609 as the Muslim expulsion.  Sorry for any confusion.  For those interested, details can be found here ... Spanish_Inquisition#Repression_of_Muslims.  ---Trippz (talk) 09:40, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Reverted edit to my last version. editor said "hostility to moors irrelevant to this article" Do not understand that statement as my research shows that the 1492 Treaty was with Isabella-Castile & the last Nasrid Muslim Emir Muhammad XII. That its effects were: (1.) immediate 'either/or' forced expulsion (and mass executions) for Jews not converting; Jewish conversos = Marrano in 1492 & (2.) written acceptance of Moors (Mudéjar people) continuing as practicing Muslims and staying in the country. In practice imperfect but not the 'either/or' demands Jews received. Then in c.1501 Ferdinand II, Spanish Inquisition founder, 'uncomfortable' Mudéjars' existance and by c.1502, via 'either/or' demands on Muslims, all remaining were decreed Catholic, Muslim conversos = Morisco. Please check related articles for Islam and Muslim relevance. ---Look2See1 (talk) 20:58, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muslims? 

message: It looks an awful lot like the Edict is written with the Arabic alphabet (though it looks like it's written left-to-right, so I cannot assume that it is also in Arabic). Might some mention be given of what language the edict was actually written in? RobertM525 (talk) 00:00, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question.  I wonder what the source of the image is.  Unfortunately, and I find this a lot with images, it was copied up to the commons, and the source there is given as the English WP, with no indication of where that came from.  -- Zsero (talk) 00:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language? 

message: Who were the secular in 15th century Europe? This entire article sounds like Christian apologetics.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.253.73.146 (talk) 18:06, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secular? 

message: What do modern genetic studies of Spanish men have to do with the actual Alhambra Decree. It should be removed from this location as it has no bearing here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.162.77.10 (talk) 18:25, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genetic studies 

message: An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC 

message: This article has been proposed for merging to Expulsion of Jews from Spain. Your feedback would be welcome at the merge discussion. Thank you. Mathglot (talk) 01:44, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion for [[Expulsion of Jews from Spain]]