lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tarrasch Defense

message: :When White plays against the Tarrasch, the most common setup is to fianchetto his king's bishop. This is because Black's 3...c5 has ruled out any possibility of blocking such a fianchettoed bishop by means of ...c6.
I don't play 1.d4 very much, so I may be wrong about this, but I thought the main idea of fianchettoing the bishop was to exert pressure on the isolani on d5 (after all, if Black playing ...c5 was in itself a good reason to fianchetto that bishop, everyone would play 2.g3 against the Sicilian!). Am I wrong? --Camembert
:No you're not. I will go ahead and add that as a reason. As for the Sicilian analogy, White often fianchettos his bishop in  the Closed Sicilian (2.Nc3), but such a plan is a little time consuming in the main, open lines of the Sicilian where speed is critical. Sjakkalle 14:54, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: I believe the section on the Semi-Tarrasch belongs with the QGD, not here, as it has nothing to do with 3....c5, really. Any other opinions on this? Hushpuckena (talk) 07:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Books such as Modern Chess Openings classify it as you said, so I say go ahead and make the change.  This article would then need to link to the Semi-Tarrasch section.  Bubba73 (talk), 19:44, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless of where the Semi-Tarrasch is placed, the defining moves of the Semi-Tarrasch are 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nf3 c5, i.e. what makes it an S-T is Black having the opportunity to recapture on d5 with the knight, not necessarily 5. cxd5 Nxd5 being played immediately. (The exchange is most common but 5. e3 is a book alternative.) I'm going to amend the diagram to give the position after Black's 4th. 91.105.18.180 (talk) 17:08, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Semi-Tarrasch
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Che y Marijuana

message: Just a small point about all legitimate anarchists supposedly being leftwing: as an example of a study of rightwing anarchism, Anarchy, State, and Utopia — a famous and influential book by Robert Nozick — examines the idea of a minimal, anarcho-capitalist state, though the overall thrust of the book is libertarian, not anarchist. SlimVirgin (talk) 06:47, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
:  Nothing surprising there, Nozick's book came into waters long since muddied by Rothbard and others who claimed the anarchist tradition while going out of their way to minimize or flat out dismiss all of the essential ideas of the tradition they were claiming.  That Nozick makes a mistake in accepting the anarcho-capitalist attempt to redefine anarchism is not evidence, in itself, to any legitimacy of claims on their part.  Evidence of legitimacy to anarcho-capitalist claims of tradition within anarchism would be evidence that the individualist anarchists who supposedly "inspired" anarcho-capitalists would have remotely accepted capitalist ideology as a genuine branch of the free-market anarchism individualists had developed.  The only problem with this is that anyone who has ever read an individualist knows that they all denounced capitalism, usually quite explicitly.  Thus we get the never-ending attempts to explain how one could, in theory, have capitalism without property, or capitalism without wage and rent, or how when so-and-so said "socialism" he meant something different than what modern anarchists means, or when so-and-so said "capitalism" he meant something different than what modern anarcho-capitalists mean, or how such-and-such single line out of a single essay should be read in isolation from the rest of the texts of the author because doing so just might put capitalism in a not-so-negative light if we squint our eyes really hard.  Kev 14:40, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Kev, as usual, assumes the answer before he begins. Nozick's use of "anarchism" isn't relevant because, well, he's not using it the way anarchists use it. Well, we already know he's not talking about anarchism in the sense that you use it. But, what we have here is an excellent example of the word "anarchism" being used in a different sense in a high-profile book by an author who is taken seriously in mainstream academe (although the author is not the libertarian most worthy of acclaim, we'll take what we can get). Nozick's readership, to my knowledge, did not react with confusion or derision at his "mistake", and I would be surprised to learn that anyone had ever suggested he change the title to Statelessness, the State, and Utopia, or something like that. This doesn't show, nor do I claim, that Nozick's use is the only acceptable use of the word "anarchy", but it is evidence that it is one acceptable use. Nat Krause 09:22, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ''[[Anarchy, State, and Utopia]]''
Talk:Yamaha YM2413

message: Yamaha PSS-140 contains a YM2420, which is a variant with slightly changed registers, used in Yamaha's own home keyboards (intentionally undocumented to avoid hardware piracy). Also SHS-10, SHS-200, VSS-200 used that chip. (Possibly earlier versions of these keyboards indeed had an YM2413.) - CYBERYOGI =CO=Windler 92.196.11.88 (talk) 01:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Yamaha PSS-140 had a different sound IC

message: It's a small point but I can't seem to find any contemporary reference to these before 1987. Are we sure they're from 1986? the source of these claims seems to be a throw away comment from the 8-bit keys guy, but i can't find anything in writing.Mechafatnick (talk) 07:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Yamaha PSS-170 and 270 Release date
Talk:Faraday (charge)

message: Searching for "Faraday" should take the user to Michael Faraday. A faraday is a nondescript unit that no one uses any more, much less important than the physicist after whom it is named. --141.154.55.199 11:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected, page renamed "Faraday (unit)". --Saaska (talk) 12:03, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect? 

message: What is the correct conversion factor from faradays to coulombs?  Faraday says 96485.3415, but conversion of units says 96485.3383.  Is either one of these an "accepted" conversion value? (message posted to Talk:Faraday and Talk:Conversion of units.) --bdesham 13:56, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct conversion to coulombs? 

message: I merged this page and changed it to redirect to Faraday constant. | Loadmaster (talk) 19:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged and redirected
Talk:Gymnure

message: It's a bit, well... chatty, don't you think? Nick.wiebe 17:70, 23 Apr 2006
It is as present uncertain if gymnures are really related to "other insectivores such as moles, shrews, tenrecs and solenodons", as tenrecs are definitely NO insectivores, solenodons probably also, and Erinaceidae also may well represent its own order. Therefore, I don't think it's good to talk about "other insectivores". Ucucha 14:18, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Gigantour

message: On April 18, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Gigantour for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 04:19, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: Can someone please tell me if they're really going to be their. Thanks Welshy1791 07:16, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they are playing some dates in Australia.  Hopefully they can fit all the hair dressers into the moving truck though :D CHSoarer 08:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bring me the Horizon 
Talk:BETA (programming language)

message: The last line claims that BETA has an "optimal balance" between compile-time and run-time type checking. Sounds quite biased. Some people think Java has the optimal balance, while others think Smalltalk does. Wouter Lievens 14:57, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have actualled programmed in BETA in the beginning of the 90's in the university of
Aarhus, Denmark. I will try to dig up some more information about this programming language
TraxPlayer (talk) 21:42, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have programmed in BETA
Talk:Christianese

message: Part of the reason for relisting was that the article had been around for so long. What apparently was not noted was that in April of 2008 it was merged and redirected . In May of 2014  the redirect was undone with the edit sumarry "redlink", which doesn't mnake a lot of sense as the target article did in fact exist at that time, before that time, and still exists now. So, for six of those years this article didn't exist until one user decided it should exist again. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 23:20, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Something that didn't really come up at the last deletion discussion
Talk:Logba language/to do

message: # Classification (Dorvlo/Blench/Stewart/Heine/Ethnologue)
# Full phoneme inventory (vowel and consonant tables)
# Better geography/demography
# Tone examples
# Grammar
# Example sentences
# Audio!
# Create map
# Create context: Ghana Togo Mountain languages, Avatime language, Lelemi language, Siwu language
Last update: — mark ✎ 06:47, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Stone Lud

message: Im about to try moving the article to Stone Lud, and to try creating redirects from Lud Stone and Lud stone. Laurel Bush 16:45, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move article?

message: The summer-solstice sunset alignment has correspondence with that of Maeshowe, a chambered cairn in Orkney, which is built so that sunlight will penetrate the cairn at the time of the same sunset.
Maeshowe is aligned with the winter solstice sunset not the summer. I don't know about the stone of Lud alignment.
I believe you may be right about Maeshowe. As a sunset bearing, the Lud bearing is definitely summer, not winter. Dont know, however, whether any one has checked it as possibly a winter sunrise bearing. Laurel Bush 11:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction ?
Talk:John Cody

message: Why is there no reference to the story of how Pope Paul VI could not decide whether or not to remove Cardinal Cody from office over allegations of financial and sexual impropriety?  [unsigned, undated; according to the history this was posted 2005.04.08]
Why indeed?  These elements are mentioned in the Paul VI entry, but not here in the entry of the man they pertain to. -Jm546 22:04, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because a reference to it wasn't contained in the sources used to create the article. As I myself don't know the details and references for it first hand, I would have qualms about adding it myself. If you do have references and details, though, feel free to add them. John Carter 16:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sacking 

message: I made a pass at including discussion and reference of improprieties, but much more could be reported about this Cardinal. 
Estéban (talk) 20:33, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Improprieties

message: I would like to remove footnote 11. It is a quote from a self-published source, and therefore fails to meet the guidelines for reliable sources. Revanneosl (talk) 20:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Footnote removal

message: Having his photo come from a site called "Ex-Catholics for Christ" seems rather biased. I'm sure something else could be found.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.11.74.233 (talk) 03:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Talk:CEDA

message: Is it fair to translate Confederación Española de Derechas Autónomas as Spanish Confederation of the Autonomous Right?  I would have thought that Derechas Autónomas was closer to the US idea of states rights, rather than a side of the political spectrum. --Henrygb 15:34, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: FOTW uses as translation Spanish Confederation of Autonomous Right-wing Parties, the Lexikon zur Geschichte der Parteien in Europa uses the translation in German Spanischer Bund autonomer Rechtsparteien, which means the same as the FOTW translation. Encarta uses Spanish Confederation of Autonomous Rightist Group. Country Studies uses Spanish Confederation of the Autonomous Right. I suggest to keep the translation, since the spanish term doesn't use parties or groups. Election World 17:32, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Page title

message: Is this article neutral? Sure??? --83.37.212.109 (talk) 11:44, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality? 

message: Going through the article history I see a persistent and continued attempt to describe this party as "monarchist" in the infobox. A key idea/motif in historiography is the "accidentalist" stances this party adopted vis-à-vis the form of government in order to get to power (once in power their intention may have been to transform the Republic into an authoritarian corporatist state alas Austrofascism). . Regardless of the monarchyphilia and monarchist political lineage members and leaders alike may have espoused, they politically played "accidentalist" tactics. Do not add monarchism as label without discussion and consensus here, since it would require layers and layers of nuances thus being probably unsuitable for the infobox (nuances so far lacking in the article in any case).--Asqueladd (talk) 19:20, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do not insert 'monarchism' in the infobox without discussion
Talk:Wanda Toscanini Horowitz

message: See Vladimir Horowitz discussion. 
I don't know if we should just label him homosexual on this page either. Perhaps changing it to a manner which generalizes sexual things.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arvindan Thekkadath (talk • contribs) 10:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any point in mentioning it on this page.  It's not like Wanda was a lesbian (although according to Harvey Sachs,  Sonia was).THD3 (talk) 13:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I mean to say, changing the term homosexuality. Implying that it was sexual orientation which Horowitz was struggling from. If anything, shouldn't there be a reference.Arvindan T. 19:25, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homosexuality
Talk:Salmon (color)

message: I recalculated all of these because none of them matched at all, not even the initial hex triplet:
: Hex triplet = #FFC0CB
: RGB    (r, g, b)    =  (256, 14, 105)
: CMYK   (c, m, y, k) =  (0, 45, 52, 0)
: HSV    (h, s, v)    =  (141, 59, 100)
Where did these come from?
--Phil | Talk 16:37, Apr 8, 2005 (UTC)
Why are there no sources? Warrior4321 23:21, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recalculation

message: Salmon is actually orange not pink.
I have reverted some large scale content removal which is not the way to go. I have trimmed the page back to the three published webcolours and added the necessary references. Smile a While (talk) 20:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not the way to go? Amazing, isn't it, how no one cares that an encyclopedia article is tagged as unreferenced for nearly two years, but immediately jumps into action when the contents then get removed. I am grateful for the work that you did, but if you don't like large scale removal, then provide the sources a bit sooner after the article is tagged. Fram (talk) 08:27, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, it is not the way to go.  has a source parameter, and a source argument was supplied to three of the infoboxes in the article. That the page was incorrectly tagged as unreferenced for almost a year (since the sources were added in November 2007) is not a reason for large-scale content removal. --Joshua Issac (talk) 10:03, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reworking 

message: Entries in List of colors: G–M contained links to this page.
The entry is :
* Light salmon pink
I don't see any evidence that this color is discussed in this article and plan to delete it from the list per this discussion: Talk:List_of_colors#New_approach_to_review_of_entries
If someone decides that this color should have a section in this article and it is added, I would appreciate a ping.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:49, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible removal from list 

message: "In Australia, salmon is mostly orange"; so says the article. But it doesn't provide enough information to be useful. This article is about the colour "salmon" - is the sentence supposed to mean that salmon meat in Australia is orange, or that Australians' opinion of the colour called "salmon" tend more toward orange than pink even though the meat is no different from other places, or what? TooManyFingers (talk) 05:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In Australia ..." 

message: The Crayola "salmon" is very unlike any piece of salmon, and also very unlike other versions. Calling it "Salmon Pink" doesn't help, because it's not salmon at all - it's just pink. Does it belong here? Is Crayola so important that even their mistakes are somehow definitive? TooManyFingers (talk) 05:55, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crayola? 

message: What relevance is terracotta? Why is it here? Is it because it's a similar colour to salmon?
I suggest that it should be removed from this page. 116.240.178.46 (talk) 13:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terracotta
Talk:Golden rice

message: Source: https://www.nature.com/news/china-sacks-officials-over-golden-rice-controversy-1.11998
I believe this is controversial and should be added to the appropriate section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.232.132.255 (talk) 06:39, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Mentioned in the Research section David notMD (talk) 08:06, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Golden Rice was tested illegally on children in China 

message: Lead says 144 g/day and the VAD section says 75 g/day. Is this a conflict, or an adult versus child thing? David notMD (talk) 08:04, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amount? 

message: This article alternates between Golden Rice (proper noun) and golden rice (common noun). Sources are mixed as well. We should pick one and be consistent. I would lean slightly toward Golden Rice to differentiate from other rice that has a similar color. Also, the article mentions Golden Rice 2 which would look strange lowercase. –CWenger (^ • @) 17:52, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper noun? 

message: E.g. xerophthalmia Scientelensia (talk) 14:05, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . –CWenger (^ • @) 15:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! Scientelensia (talk) 16:25, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could we make the diseases listed in the intro links?
Talk:John Lloyd (producer)

message: Hello, I am the John Lloyd in question. I have re-ordered the page a little bit, re-instated a few baffling removals and added a few fully deserved co-credits. I hope that's all right. I notice that the article lacks sources but I can verify that it is now substantially accurate - at least as it leaves me, dated this day very early on the 9th April, 2008.  
John Lloyd jl@qi.com 88.97.15.28 (talk) 23:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Even as a fan of 'The Meaning of Liff', surely Mr Lloyd is better known as The Producer of Not The Nine O'Clock News, Spitting Image, Blackadder and QI? (bingo99) 23:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Moreover there is writer called John Lloyd and born in 1917. I suggest to move this article to the full name John Hardress Wilfred Lloyd. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 13:58, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Shouldn't this entry be titled 'John Lloyd(producer)'?

message: Lloyd is credited without citation as the creator of 'In the Manor Born'. The article for that series does not mention  him at all (except in passing in an un-sourced comment), and IMDb doesn't mention him either. Seems TtMB was 'created' by Peter Spence and produced by Gareth Gwenlan, Justin Davies and Jon Plowman. Looks like a Lloyd fan has given credit where it's not due. Newburyjohn (talk) 07:21, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career
Talk:Drug diversion

message: What is the reasoning for regulating Schedule I and II drug manufacturers more restrictively than Schedule I and II drug distributors? I suspect it is partly a subsidy for the current drug manufacturers, and also due to the ease with which a licensed producer could manufacture a large amount of pharmaceutical-grade addictive drugs, with the equipment and materials available to them through their business. Rad Racer | Talk 16:51, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for regulations

message: Both this page and Pharmaceutical diversion seem to refer to exactly the same phenomenon, they should be merged. nigell k (talk) 05:17, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, be WP:BOLD and merge one into the other.  Please be sure to copy all of the tags, categories and stubs to the remaining article. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 18:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Gods people, what are you waiting for?  Merged. - Jason A. Quest (talk) 02:25, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 
Category talk:Churches in London

message: Why do we need a seperate category for Churches in London, instead of having the churches listed under London places of worship as they were until today?. It seems to me that as the vast majority of places of worship in London are churches, this change does not help (much) in terms of limiting category size but simply deepens the heirarchy and makes it less usable. -- Chris j wood 16:54, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would guess that there are many, many mosques, temples, synagogues, sacred places etc in London. If and when all of these get articles London places of worship would be huge! It makes more sense to me to have separate categories for this eventuality. Just my 2p. Corvine 17:02, 8 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The places of worship category can't properly be placed in the parent churches category. CalJW 23:51, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why
Talk:Britannia Silver

message: Could someone please separate "Britannia Silver" from "Britannia Metal"; they are two entirely different things. WB2 01:26, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britannia Metal 

message: How do I fix the Transwiki to read Britannia Silver and not Britannia metal; how do I keep these two pages from redirecting back and forth between each other? WB2 02:20, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you – WB2 02:32, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Help
Talk:Desquamation

message: "For example, once the rash of measles fades, there is desquamation. Also seen in Toxic Shock Syndrome in the eye, the epithelial basement membrane (lens capsule) completely encloses the lens,..."
This seems confused.  First, presumably the statement about measles relates to anywhere on the exterior of the body, since it's discussing a rash, right?  
Then the second sentence is unrelated, and probably should start a new paragraph.  And what is it that is "also seen"? From the syntax it must be the epithelial basement membrane, but why would a membrane be seen in a syndrome?  
Then the 3rd para "Nonpathological desquamation..." returns to discussion of the general skin situation.  I'm thinking that maybe the discussion on the special situation of the eye would make more sense after the general skin discussion. 
Maybe someone who knows this field could make this clearer?  Gwideman (talk) 11:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I went through the history, found the problem(s), and fixed them. Issues corrected: removed plagiarized material from PLoS ONE; organized more logically; expanded significantly; assorted grammar and usage fixes. --Ginkgo100talk 03:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed regarding the eye 

message: Can someone explain in the article what the difference is between desquamation and pityriasis? Eric Kvaalen (talk) 06:56, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Pityriasis