Talk:Baitul Futuh Mosque

message: Please note that this is the largest Ahmadiyya mosque in Europe. There is a difference between mainstream Muslims and Ahmadiyyas, which can be seen as comparable to the difference between mainstream Christians and Jehovah's witnesses  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.43.185.36 (talk) 20:38, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distinguish 

message: Removed the following from the lead (misleading characterization), and retain it here for possible mention in appropriate context elsewhere in the article: 
The Mosque has also been voted in the top 50 buildings in the world by Spectator magazine Baitul Futuh - top 50 buildings in the world Spectator magazine
Mavigogun (talk) 07:34, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion, shouldn't it not be removed until it is mentioned in the appropriate content. Secondly I'm confused why it  misleading. Secondly, not related with this, why is it that a clarification is needed for the Ahmadiyya Peace Prize, when there is already a reference provided. Thank You Peaceworld111 (talk) 19:45, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding the clarification tag: it is unclear to me whether this is the first prize awarded to Lord Eric, the first awarded at the mosque, the first awarded to Lord Eric at the mosque, or the first Ahmadıyya Muslim Peace Prize awarded, ever.   Second, what does the word historic mean in this context?   Has the award been given for many years, or is it being asserted that this contemporary event is being ascribed a historic nature?   The tag does not concern references. Mavigogun (talk) 10:57, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding the removal to the talk page of magazine poll: a Spectator poll isn't an authoritative source for architectural assessments; were this the opinion of, say, sourced opinion from Architectural Digest or the International Order of Architectural Engineers (or some such), then the importance conveyed the opinion by inclusion in the article lead might be appropriate.   The high regard held for Baitul Futuh by Spectator readers may be noteworthy - thus my suggestion to include it in another section - but inclusion in the lead would ascribe it more importance than it warrants (essentially, it would be confabulating global stature). Mavigogun (talk) 11:09, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retained material for possible inclusion elsewhere   

message: I undertook a full rewrite to address the following issues:
* readability 
* diction
* syntax
* encyclopedic character
I endeavored to retain as much material and meaning as possible- consider this when apprehending the merit of the edit and making further improvements.Mavigogun (talk) 08:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: A great Thank You. Peaceworld111 (talk) 19:47, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding a recent major edit 

message: Please add interior images to the gallery, including mihrab, minbar, and dome.--Mavigogun (talk) 08:22, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: done --Ceddyfresse (talk) 16:56, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent. Mavigogun (talk) 17:41, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for interior images 

message: The only sources claiming the superiority (in term of largess) of English Mosque are the BRISTISH newspaper. It is essential to stress it or in alternative the main article should be deemed as NOT NEUTRAL. British newspapers talking about a British mosque cannot be deemed as reliable. Someone could complain a certain "hooligans" attitude of them when talking about national subjects.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.92.153.12 (talk) 11:58, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you saying "hooligans" run the BBC? While I admire a healthy dose of cynicism when it comes to news media, I don't think we can disregard facts simply because they were reported on by it's own country's media. It's laughable, really. 196.215.18.76 (talk) 09:29, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  British newspapers 

message: Actually, the mosque would be the biggest Ahmadi mosque in Europe and the biggest islamic building in the UK. The largest is the Mosque of Rome. I am not sure whether the word AHMADI I've inserted sounds nicer, but if someone doesn't prefer this, then this sentence can be considered "the largest mosque in Great Britain". --115ash→(☏) 13:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: @115ash You keep inserting a 'debunking' of 'largest mosque in Europe' (you did it again today) reducing the capacity of the mosque to a third of its verified capacity. I'm not going to edit this article, but I suspect you don't have a neutral point of view. SrLoco (talk) SrLoco (talk) 12:59, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest Ahmadi mosque  

message: Military victories? For a religious group who claim to be peaceful, that is weird.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:1C99:9722:A280:9A79 (talk) 07:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which kind of "victories"? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Baitul Futuh Mosque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.mertonconnected.com/MYP-conference-2009
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100426231444/http://www.loveforallhatredfornone.org:80/downloads/ to http://www.loveforallhatredfornone.org/downloads/
*Added  tag to http://www.itnews.it/news/2010/0322080207619/inaugural-ahmadiyya-muslim-peace-prize-awarded-to-lord-eric-avebury.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100820010822/http://www.loveforallhatredfornone.org:80/contact.html to http://www.loveforallhatredfornone.org/contact.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:14, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified