Talk:Takhisis

message: I've changed the text to refer to Huma driving Takhisis out during the Third Dragon War, not the first.  This is backed up by the Dragonlance Campaign Setting, among other sources. --Jelloman 14:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That is fine enough. I have corrected yesterday that the War of the Lance is the Fourth Dragon War, but haven't had the time to correct all the other wars around. -- ReyBrujo 14:42, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Third Dragon War

message: I've added an image on this page, which is an image described as Tiamat, the D&D goddess, however it is pulled from the novel, "Dark Queen of Krynn", which is obviously Takhisis, and thus I believe it can be used on each article.  Does anyone dispute this? DoomsDay349 03:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Image 

message: Per the redirecting of all the other Dragonlance god articles on the cleanup of List of Dragonlance deities, I also wish to redirect this article on Takhisis.  The cleaned section on her in the main list provides all the information necessary and eliminates the need for this extraneous article.  If anyone has any questions, feel free to ask.  I'll leave a timeframe of two days open before I redirect this again, in order to wait for comment.  DoomsDay349 15:54, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirecting 

message: Please see notability discussion in the talk page for fellow Dragonlance deity, Paladine.  Support for the notability of this article is similar in form to the support for notability of Paladine, but can be paraphrased as "Dragonlance is notable, Takhisis is a notable part of Dragonlance, therefore the article on Takhisis is notable."  Dalamori (talk) 19:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You are basically asserting that notability is inherited; it is not. See WP:RS. Cheers, Jack Merridew 08:49, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It looks like we're going to finish this debate principally on Talk:Paladine (Dragonlance), so let's table this for now, until that discussion has reached a conclusion.  Dalamori (talk) 00:10, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the notability of each topic must be examined separately. So far there are no reliable sources cited in this article, and so the notability cleanup template should remain. --Gavin Collins (talk) 08:56, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

text:  Concur; and please do not make undiscussed copy-pastes of templates that have wide consensus. Cheers, Jack Merridew 09:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding Notability 

message: With article about Paladine we can read about comparisons with other fictional characters. And how Takhisis can be compared with? Colours of dragons reminds colours from M:tG but I think it isn't purposeful. But she is archetypical, like Paladine so maybe can we find comparings with mythology, for example Ereshkigal or Hel? And some fictional characters can have the same source.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.181.9.151 (talk) 13:59, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compars 

message: Deletion of this article has been recently suggested by User:TTN with the text "Fails WP:GNG". Following, User:BOZ has suggested a merge rather than deletion instead.
I have removed the deletion prod, as I think this is not a case of "uncontroversial deletion". There are quite a number of secondary sources, and the amount of text based on secondary rather than primary sources is not so small, so in my opinion this should not be deleted. I would be fine with a merge to List of Dragonlance characters, but would personally prefer keeping it as an article. Daranios (talk) 22:06, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I am of a like mind that it can be kept, but a merge is preferable to deletion. BOZ (talk) 22:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete, Merge or Keep?