lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Virulent Newcastle disease

message: Does anyone know the origin of the name? Why Newcastle?
--Snorre/Antwelm 16:17, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Birds of genus Anas are not sick of this disease. Photography by sick mallard mislead readers--Izvora (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anas 

message: Dow AgroSciences has an approved vaccine, manufactured in transgenic tobacco, against Newcastle disease. http://www.genengnews.com/articles/chitem.aspx?aid=3074
Stevehartwell (talk) 15:29, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: =

message: Virus Shows Promise as Prostate Cancer Treatment
Feb. 25, 2013 — A recombinant Newcastle disease virus kills all kinds of prostate cancer cells, including hormone-resistant cells, but leaves normal cells unscathed, according to a paper published online ahead of print in the Journal of Virology.
(http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/02/130225153141.htm)
-- Jo3sampl (talk) 02:12, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Report of a recent study 
Talk:Juggling convention

message: I took out the sentence about the Sydney Juggling Convention being "the only juggling convention in Australia" as an annual Melbourne Juggling Convention is starting this year.  
Popstar dave 05:00, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sydney Convention
Talk:Pablo Amaringo

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- HornandsoccerTalk 04:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: The birthdate listed as 1943 is incorrect. This should be 1938.
thanks & regards
H G Charing (talk) 09:48, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Half the sources I see say 1938, half 1943.  I've added a 'citation needed' tag to the article.  --CliffC (talk) 15:55, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date of Pablo Amaringo
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Don Saklad

message: I don't think it's good that someone entered "invalid vote" in front of several votes.  I think that submitting comments below a vote is okay (though sometimes nerve-wracking), but I don't think that editing someone's vote text to say "invalid vote" is okay. --Takeel 16:40, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing votes to say "invalid vote": I don't like it.
Talk:Truco

message: The article says that the game uses a Spanish deck, from which the 8's and 9's have been removed. I didn't realize a Spanish deck HAD 8's and 9's to remove. ;) Should that be changed? Vince In Milan 23:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My "Vitoria" deck has 8's and 9's , but it is surely a modern version. I haven't ever seen another deck like mine in my life... I would wait a bit if someone comes around with a different opinion and, if not, change it. --Neigel von Teighen | help with arbs? 10:10, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are 50 and 40 cards versions of the Spanish deck. The most numerous version including 8s and 9s, and two jokers (comodines). --Mariano(t/c) 16:50, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish Deck?

message: You don't mention the origin of the game, wich is the Balearic Islands and Valencia, where there is still played, and very popular, also it's named truc, which should be the name of the article. I can explain how it works if you want to expand the article. My mail blackprotoss @ gmail.com. I speak better spanish or catalan than english, but I can try.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.38.60.224 (talk) 03:41, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Valencian and Balear Truc

message: Truco is one of our national card games together with Buraco, the more elaborate variant of Canasta. This article has been marvelously written by one who really knows about the game. It precisey describes the many different versions played throughout Brazil.
I just can't undersand why this article is being under discussion for a merge with something that doesn't even exit. The artile is mainly about the game played in Brazil. Why not then a separate article called Truco Argentina ? It's indeed an integral part of Argentina's culture, and I am sure that historical information about the game will be soon added from both countries.
As for the article Truc, it will be soon created separately from this article, due to the amount of information available. Any Reference, Source, Link or information provided for this article  will be greatly appreciated. Krenakarore (talk) 18:24, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: BraSilian Truco

message: Perico and Perica are the 11 and 10 of the open card (vira) for the current round. Someone else mentioned the following: Caballo of clubs (11), in some regions called Perico, worth 30 points, Sota of coins (10), in some regions called Perica, worth 29 points. How should we sort this out? Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 03:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: First, I've got a name. Second, if you'll find any other referenced information, then you'll may contest Parlett and McLeod's. Krenakarore TK 10:31, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You can discuss the subject on the talk page yes, but you shouldn't remove the references from the article just because you disagree on them. Call for a third opinion, ask for advice from an administrator or whatever, but don't remove referenced material from the article before a consensus. Listen, I won't go back to this again !  Krenakarore TK 00:14, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perico and perica
Talk:WWF Shotgun Saturday Night

message: Shotgun Saturday Night is the second Dan Rhodes novel by Bill Crider, but at the moment here it is just a redirect to WWF Shotgun Saturday Night. Is it advisable to remove that redirect and create a disambiguation page? Btw the page about the novel does not exist. Schickaneder (talk) 14:30, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Crider Novel
Talk:Gulf Stream

message: The heading of the article claims that there is consensus about the gulf stream and then doesn't provide a single citation for that claim. Claiming consensus feels a bit bold, but doing it without *any* citations seems like a huge mistake.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:CD01:F090:79CF:65B7:823A:16D1 (talk) 01:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "there is consensus" 

message: I'm unsure how to include this in the article but seems very important, please can someone check it and include?
* https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/aug/05/climate-crisis-scientists-spot-warning-signs-of-gulf-stream-collapse
Thanks
John Cummings (talk) 16:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Another recent study found that the Gulf Stream may collapse in less than a decade, possibly as early as 2025. Jarble (talk) 19:15, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guardian: Climate crisis, Scientists spot warning signs of Gulf Stream collapse 

message: The Gulf Stream's potential for renewable power generation is not significant enough to warrant its own section in this article, at least not at this point in time. The articles cited in this section are academically interesting (primarily the Yang et al. (2013) paper, none of the other references add much beyond this) but there is no significant/large-scale project underway to exploit the Gulf Stream as an energy source. A layperson reading this article may leave with the impression that this is a serious undertaking, when this is not the case.
Scleractinian (talk) 14:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: deleted Chidgk1 (talk) 12:19, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion to remove "renewable power generation" section 

message: This article suggests it won’t. Doug Weller talk 20:18, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMOC article says AMOC shutdown will cool British Isles
Talk:Bhartrihari (grammarian)

message: The Nuttall entry reads
:BHARTRIHARI, Indian author of apothegms, who appears to have lived in the 11th century B.C., and to have been of royal rank.
which doesn't fit with the dates in the encyclopedia. Also, I'm unsure, if this is the same as B. the poet. Please add, if you are knowledgeable--J heisenberg 17:28, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsure
Talk:Cornhole (disambiguation)

message: I'm very confused by this:
----
Dopamine can refer to more than one thing:
Look up Dopamine in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
    * Dopamine is this.
    * Dopamine (Film) is a Film.
</noinclude>
----
As I see no reason it should be on the Cornhole disambig page. I tried to remove it, but when I went to edit the page it didn't show up.Candybars 02:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I managed to remove it. Candybars 03:03, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dopamine removal

message: I just moved this off the disambig page:
*Cornhole is the name of an irreverent indie/country rock band from Denton, Texas who released the albums Down by the Gloryhole in 1995 and Hornswoggled in 1997.
This is a dictionary defintion, and there is no link to an article. Further, I don't know if an article is warranted, because I am not sure it meets the notability criteria. Jokestress 17:29, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Band Removal

message: I have added a few navigational aids in response to the prod. Jokestress (talk) 05:53, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 2012 prod
Talk:Pat McCrory

message: Per WP:BRD, I have reverted edits by SunCrow which fail to reflect the cited reliable sources and bizarrely claim that gender identity is a "nebulous concept" - that's not what sources say. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:29, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There is nothing nebulous about the term. Furthermore, it's absolutely essential to mention transgender individuals in the context of the bathroom bills (as shown by all RS coverage on the issue), even if SunCrow refuses to recognize their existence. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 03:59, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:NPOV, I continue to object to the slanted language contending that HB2 "prevent[ed] transgender people who have not altered their birth certificates from using the restroom consistent with their gender identity". That entire clause should be removed, and the sentence should simply read, "It declared that in government buildings, individuals may use only the restrooms that correspond to the sex on their respective birth certificates". Also, no one said anything about not recognizing anyone's existence. Finally, given the fact that there are apparently now 54 different gender identities (see https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/gender-identity-terms), I seem to be on very firm ground pointing out that gender identity is a nebulous concept. SunCrow (talk) 04:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: An article which discusses and defines 54 different terms related to gender identity does not support your claim that "there are 54 different gender identities." Please don't misrepresent sources. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 04:34, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right, NorthBySouthBaranof. A closer review of the source shows that it lists a total of 41 different gender identities, not 54. I was off by 13. Shame on me. I will now proceed to punish myself by (a) eating only vegan food for a week; and (b) watching Rachel Maddow on a nightly basis until my head explodes. SunCrow (talk) 17:05, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Gender identity is a term that has been defined by demographers and used in the collection of national census data. I'm quite confident that it is less "nebulous" than many concepts you use on a daily basis. Newimpartial (talk) 18:04, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Stop bothering me. I'm busy with my self-imposed penance. Binge-watching Rachel Maddow right now. My head hasn't exploded yet, but I feel the pressure building... SunCrow (talk) 19:02, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  SunCrow's disputed edits 

message: Who removed from article? https://www.americanswiss.org/members/alumni-in-leadership-positions/ Wikipietime (talk) 14:50, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Swiss Foundation
Talk:Myriophyllum aquaticum

message: Most of the plant/tree pages I've been reading have the information on where the plant/tree is native and its distribution, including if it's recognised as an invasive species, in the introductory paragraph.
 
May I suggest for consistency that the information from the "habitat" section be moved to the introductory paragraph.
Tzali (talk) 12:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion moving information from 'habitat' to introductory paragraph
Talk:Social marketing

message: Important to not confuse commericial marketing with social marketing - the primary aim of social marketing is 'social good' - so the central ethical questions in its use focus on : a) how is the 'social good' defined .
b) who is involved in the 'defining'.  
How was social marketing first applied in the 1970s? --Mereda 07:24, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: It's totally different, D00D

message: I have heard the use of Web 2.0 Applications for the purpose of marketing referred to as Social Marketing.  I don't know how commonly used it is, but I think it should be mentioned in it's own section. 69.19.14.43 (talk) 02:19, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Web 2.0 Marketing 

message: Can we improve the introductory para somewhat ? Please click here for  a similar definition
Sanjiv swarup (talk) 06:15, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am all for making it clearer and shorter. The only thing I would say is ensure that the very first sentences starts with "Social marketing is...", or something like that. If you have important references please also add those (either by putting them in the lead or by mentioning them in the main text; some people don't put references in the lead, others do. If the lead is a summary of the article then a reference is not strictly necessary although it never hurts to add some). EMsmile (talk) 11:12, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar definition 

message: Volume number was incorrect for the Kotler/Zaltman article; changed the volume from 36 to 35. ProfMontgomery (talk) 20:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor correction to a reference 

message: — Assignment last updated by Annie.shepherd (talk) 22:51, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: COML 509: Social Media Engagement and Analysis
Talk:Annie Glenn

message: If anyone feels that I have got the sentence structure wrong regarding the bullet points, please feel free to correct it. I'm referring in particular to the full stop after the last bullet point. Jdhowens90 17:44, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proper sentence structure

message: I'm a little concerned about the "Influence during the Space Race" section of this article. It relies almost exclusively on The Astronaut Wives Club as its source not just for facts, but also for (potentially controversial) overarching conclusions about what those facts said about contemporary society. Things like "during this time of national anxiety, Americans found security in their values of family, patriotism, and consumerism, all of which were embodied in Glenn," "during the 1950s, the desire to have a perfect family life was so ingrained in societal values it seemed to Americans a harmonious family life was necessary for national security," "there was a quiet but prevalent understanding that women needed to pursue a peaceful marriage as a way to support the United States during the Cold War," "Glenn was also an indirect propagator of the American value of consumption," and "as a result of Glenn and the other members of the Astronaut Wives Club, women across the U.S. were inspired to be brave and of course, to buy the same consumer goods Glenn and the other wives had in their homes" may all be true, but to simply state all of these things as fact because one author said so (even if she is the most notable author on this topic) seems like a classic case of :Template:One source. -Elmer Clark (talk) 05:42, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I will agree with that. Except for the introductory paragraph, the whole section "Influence during the Space Race" consists of references to the book The Astronaut Wives Club (book).  I rephrased the section to more accurately attribute the content as Koppel's analysis of Glenn's role. Skepticalgiraffe (talk) 15:07, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent solution, the section is much better now. -Elmer Clark (talk) 20:53, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overreliance on the Astronaut Wives Club
Talk:American Recordings (album)

message: That is clearly not irony. I thought this was supposed to be an encyclopaedia?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.233.152.179 (talk) 15:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ironic? 
Talk:Biggus Dickus

message: I honestly cannot read this article without crying tears of laughter, simply for remembering the film. ”He wanks as high as any in Wome“, this cracks me up every single time. — Mütze 00:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't his name be spelled Biggus Diccus? Latin didn't combine the C and the K, did they? .... god damn, I'm not actually nitpicking this, am I? DS 17:53, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you find it whimsical when we spell the name "Biggus Dickus?" That's how it's spelled in the script and the credits that's how it should be spelled here. --InformationalAnarchist 17:59, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Myself I would be partial to BIGGVS DICCVS, but nobody's going to be that pedantic. ;) I'd stick with the "Dickus" spelling, even though "K" isn't a typical Latin character. - furrykef (Talk at me) 23:13, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Latin spelling?

message: I think this character needs to be merged to Life of Brian. He's a supporting character, actually, and doesn't serve much to the plot.--Orthologist 17:25, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, I think you're right. It seems to me that Wikipedia has gradually been getting more serious over the years, reducing the scope for articles like these. In short: Biggus Dickus has his own article because he's funny, and by extension the article itself is funny in some way. But I suppose that's not good enough anymore (one could argue it never was in the first place, though I might not necessarily agree). So I support the merge. - furrykef (Talk at me) 19:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, for much the same reasons.  It's a great joke, but lacks any real significance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DoctorWorm (talk • contribs) 17:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. He was funny but not exactly important to the film's plot--$UIT 02:06, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, who even made this page in the first place? What, Biggus Dickus gets his own page but Brian doesn't? MERGE. Slartibartfast1992 21:59, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

text: The redirect was quite satisfactory. End of story. Will delete uppermost part of this talk page (the table about the article). It's not needed now that it's just a redirect. Slartibartfast1992 00:56, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

text: This version of the article contains much more information about Biggus Dickus found in Life of Brian and I think the merge should be undone. - Puck (talk) 01:41, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Casco Bay

message: I'm trying to find the actual number of islands in Casco Bay.  It may be hard to pin down, due to tides, etc.  I did find this, from the Robert York, the "Maine Answer Man" and "Maine's official state historian for nearly four decades":
:York tried, without success, to burst some of the myths about Maine history.
:One is that Casco Bay has "calendar islands" -- one for each day of the year. In fact, he says, there are a little more than two hundred islands, not 365. 
That is the most reliable source I have found thus far.Econrad 14:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good find!  These refs make a good addition to the article. Isoxyl 17:10, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual number of islands 

message: I suggest we do Merge the Calendar Islands article with Casco Bay (Maine), and place a redirect from Calendar Islands to here.  There is no unique information there. Isoxyl 17:13, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Repaired links to Eagle Isl;and, pointing to the Casco Bay island. --Dumarest 17:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Eagle Island

message: Not entirely sure that the up-and-coming composers Peter J. McLaughlin and Akiva G. Zamcheck  are as yet notable enough to deserve equal prominence with Walter Chronkite--? but I will defer to other editors' views, and await consensus.ElijahBosley (talk ☞)  17:37, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Up and coming composers
Talk:Duala people

message: I just merged some this article, once located at Bakweri, to the Duala peoples article. Much of this is racist or flat-out wrong, however (are we talking about human beings or Ewoks?), so I left much of it out. BrianSmithson 18:00, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[1911 Encyclopedia Britannica]] article

message: To explain the cuts and changes I made to the article: I had originally attempted to make this article about all ethnic groups who speak one of the Duala languages. However, I now realize that this was a mistake. None of my sources lumps them all together, so it is unfair to do so here. There is more than enough information to write long, fully fleshed-out articles about the Duala, Isubu, Bakweri, Mungo, etc. Thus, I've refocused this article to be about the people who, in the previous incarnation of this article, were referred to as the "Duala proper". I will spin the cut material off into articles on the other ethnic groups soon. My apologies, — BrianSmithson 15:59, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refocusing article 

message: I've reverted some changes by User:Esimo. The changes added some unsourced images (good images, but ones for which the source and copyright status were not given), added some language that violates the neutral point of view policy (calling the Bamileke "invasive" and Rudolf Duala Manga Bell a "patriot"), removed random mentions of the Limba people and their language (mentions that were backed by sources), and added a link to a blog, which is against our external links policy. I hope Esimo will check out the policy pages I've linked to for further information. — BrianSmithson 22:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverts 

message: The German colonial period is simply described as bad - without any evidence, while the article advocates the French and British colonial rulers. The sections about the history give a very superficial impression. For example, there is no proof that the majority of the Duala people wanted the British back. As I heard in various media, many Cameroonians want the Germans to come back and rule the country again. In addition to that, many of them see the French colonial period as much worse than the German one. The article seems to be disinforming.--77.4.221.248 (talk) 08:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This has been unadressed since 2011. I have now removed all statements marked "citation needed", because clearly nobody has worked on this page for five years. I have not removed the cleanup template, because this in no way eliminates the problem. --dab (𒁳) 09:47, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: I removed these two images from the reference section.


I can't see where they should be in the article, so I've moved the details here. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested ∆transmissions∆ °co-ords° 13:27, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images from the reference section
Talk:WWE Confidential

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Montreal Screwjob (WWE Confidential). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Marcocapelle (talk) 10:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Montreal Screwjob (WWE Confidential)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]