Talk:Northeast Conference

message: There is a discussion to clarify our policy/guideline on the use of sports team logos.  Please see Wikipedia_talk:Logos#Clarification_on_use_of_sports_team_logos if you wish to participate in the discussion. Johntex\talk 16:41, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Logos

message: why doesnt the map show new york state? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.36.197.244 (talk) 20:22, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  map is wrong 

message: Can anyone help assist me create a seperate Northeast Conference Men's Basketball Tournament page for the past and future tournament results.Rhetto1025 (talk) 00:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Men's Basketball Tournament 

message: The table of current conference members has some color coding (gray, green, gold, etc.) but doesn't explain what the colors signify, if anything. Anyone know what the meaning is, or should that be removed for clarity? Duncan1800 02:35, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color coding? 

message: I noticed that conferences in List of NCAA conferences have articles, usually including a membership timeline. While some of the decisions made for each conference make some sense, there is a wide variety of styles for the various timelines, particularly involving color choices, but also other matters of style that could be more consistent.
for example, a school with a yellow bar means:
* An associate member in one sport (if part of the BE)
* A former member of the conference (in the SEC)
* A future member of the conference (in the SEC and Big West)
* A football only member (in the Sun Belt)
* A team that has moved to another conference (in the WAC, NEC)
* A full member of the Big Sky
Some graphs have captions, some do not, and none are centered.
To see the variety of styles, review Current conference timelines
I think it would be worth discussing how best to provide some measure of consistency, recognizing that there may be legitimate reasons for some differences from a standard presentation (for example, some conferences show the name of the new conference for former members. In some cases, this makes sense, in other, it may not.)
I've produced a draft of how the timelines would look with some consistency added.
Please see Draft proposal of conference timelines.
I propose a discussion to see if there is consensus on improving the consistency.
Because it would not be practical to have this discussion on each and every conference talk page, I suggest centralizing this discussion at the Talk page of Project College football SPhilbrick(Talk) 02:19, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to make timelines more consistent 

message: The conference has issued a statement (http://www.northeastconference.org/news/2012/12/14/GEN_StatementOnRealignment_12_14_12.aspx) that Monmouth and Quinnipiac is leaving the conference. It hasn't been official by the MAAC they are joining, but leaving the NEC is now official.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.28.169.105 (talk) 21:57, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monmouth and Quinnipiac is leaving the NEC 

message: A discussion on the Project College Football talk page has been created to discuss the proper format of the overview maps that are used for the US collegiate athletic conference pages.
If you're interested, please join the discussion here:  Athletic conference overview maps and their lack of consistency. Mdak06 (talk) 23:53, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion about overview maps for US collegiate athletic conferences 

message: Please join discussion at the College Basketball Wikiproject for forming a consensus on the creation of a basic navbox for college basketball teams. CrazyPaco (talk) 06:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  College basketball team navboxes 

message: Would it be possible for someone to explain what the Brenda Weare Commissioner's Cup is, and how it is awarded. Basically the article says who won it and when, but not much else. Will102 (talk) 06:58, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brenda Weare Commissioner's Cup 

message: Hi, I removed the notability tag which you added to this article without specifying a particular reason to which folks could respond.  This is a NCAA Division I (FCS) conference per this and we have articles for all of Division I conference and even the lower Division II and Division III level (see :Category:NCAA conferences).  If you have a more specific concern, please state. UW Dawgs (talk) 22:57, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi UW Dawgs (talk) - My concern with this article is that its sources, including the one you provide as evidence for notability, stems from primary or trivial websites. The article does not provide any links from trusted 3rd party sources supporting notability. If you have found any such links, could you include them in the article? Aust331 (talk) 05:44, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi, I don't disagree with the refimprove tag, however I am going to decline to perform the trivial google search which shows GNG for this article as peer to the sibling articles within the 13 FCS conferences (Division I - FBS and Division I - FCS are the two highest levels of NCAA athletics, followed by Division II and Division III and we have longstanding, interlinked, and sourced articles for all related aspects).  You are clearly welcome to retag, accordingly. Chhers, UW Dawgs (talk) 16:45, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  challenge to notability