Talk:Nottingham station

message: Please comment at Talk:Birmingham New Street station
Well actually the move of this page did not go against naming convention as it should include station street tram stop. Simply south 13:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed page move

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per discussion below. -GTBacchus(talk) 01:36, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revisited

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
====Survey - Support votes====
# Support second option as the majority of articles are named this way. Keith D 13:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Support second option as the majority of articles are named this way. Keith D 13:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - Support votes

message: *The Hereford - Nottingham service is now split into separately worked HFD - BHM and BHM - NOT.
*Taking the "fast" STP - NOT service to be that operating non-stop to Leicester, the preceding station is (for some, but not all trains) Beeston.
-- Picapica 11:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HFD - NOT / STP - NOT 

message: The last paragraph under the "Nottingham station today" section (below) is a state. Tokyo Underground (talk) 18:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very poorly written. 

message: Is it worth taking all the blockade information on the page and creating its own section, with reference to the logistical operation that goes with it? Considering it's the largest line closure on the MML for years, it has very little mention on this article or on the East Midlands Trains article. Mike1901 (talk) 17:40, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: We need to avoid recentism. Will it still seem that important in ten years time?--Charles (talk) 17:49, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a tricky balance, admittedly. I just think it can't be ignored seeing as the station will be almost completely out of action for over a month. Mike1901 (talk) 17:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: We do have precedent. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point! Will leave this discussion open for another couple of days just in case anyone else has strong feelings against my proposal, and then will start work on doing a similar section to the one on the Reading article.  Mike1901 (talk) 19:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

text: If there's enough material, go for it. We shouldn't limit our coverage of one aspect because we don't have sufficient coverage of another. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:25, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nottingham Station Remodelling/Blockade 

message: As the station is now multi-modal, should it not be moved to Nottingham station and be merged with the Nottingham Station tram stop article? That is the usual procedure with multi-modal railway/tram stations, such as Birmingham Snow Hill station and Manchester Victoria station. G-13114 (talk) 18:27, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on Bulwell station and Hucknall station I was expecting a merger, or move to Nottingham station to occur.  —Sladen (talk) 22:09, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: See the discussion about this at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_Railways#Nottingham_station. There doesn't seem to be much justification for two articles. I'll merge them unless anyone sees any reason to object. G-13114 (talk) 16:32, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I tend to agree. I renamed the previous Station Street tram stop to Nottingham Station tram stop because it changed its name as well as moving a few metres, but I think a merger would be a better eventual solution. We need to make sure that we don't lose the history of the old Station Street tram stop in the process; I'm not sure if it is best to keep that as a separate article or merge that in too. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 16:50, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably best to merge the whole lot to be honest. The previous Station Street was just a temporary arrangement, it probably doesn't warrant an article on its own. G-13114 (talk) 15:00, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with tram stop article 

message: The article has had  at the article level for two years now. Looking at the article as it stands today, it is difficult to see what needs to be changed. Perhaps some of the details on the engineering of the tram bridge, or the rather long section on a footbridge, are tending this way, but not IMHO sufficiently to leave this template on. It may be that the offending over detail has already been removed. Unfortunately there is no discussion on the talk page to indicate why it was added, so it is difficult to know. I think the best thing to do is to remove the template and start a discussion here. Maybe that will lead to the template going back on, but at least then we will have a record of why. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 13:56, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed <nowiki>{{overly detailed}}</nowiki> 

message: On a similar subject, the article has a very detailed list of the normal usage of the station's six platforms. Trouble is that I'm pretty sure (and other bits of the article explicitly say) that the station has seven platforms now, and I rather suspect  some of the described usages are no longer normal or, indeed, possible. Unfortunately most of the usual sources are equally out of date, and I'm too far away to take a look even if that wouldn't be OR. Could somebody take a look at this. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 14:42, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a ref, using a recent (2013) source that shows seven. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:11, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. That sorts out the configuration, but I'm still very dubious about the normal usage. For example, the article has St Pancras trains leaving from platforms 3 and 4, but a check of live departures just now shows them on 5 and 6, which corresponds to what I remember from my last visit. I've added  for now, but I'm pondering pulling that information altogether. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 09:30, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: We should consider WP:NOTTIMETABLE and WP:NOTTRAVEL - anybody who wants to get a London train from Nottingham should check with the information given at the station (or an authoritative website like NRE or that of the TOC) and shouldn't be using Wikipedia to find out which platform to go to. So I think we should be very sparing with platform usage information. --Redrose64 (talk) 11:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Section now rewritten with normal usage removed. - chris_j_wood (talk) 21:12, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platforms 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Nottingham station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150903172858/http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=1409 to http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=1409
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Nottingham station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140415214302/http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/netphase2/index.aspx?articleid=18186 to http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/netphase2/index.aspx?articleid=18186
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:07, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Nottingham station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060221233355/http://nottingham.openguides.org:80/?Nottingham_Train_Station to http://nottingham.openguides.org/?Nottingham_Train_Station
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Nottingham station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425130441/http://www.bdp.com/Documents/Publications/Transport%20by%20BDP.pdf to http://www.bdp.com/Documents/Publications/Transport%20by%20BDP.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/content/detail.aspx?ReleaseID=5406
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140413124752/http://www.bdp.com/News/2008/BDP-Appointed-for-Retail-Elemant-of-Birminghams-New-Street-Station/ to http://www.bdp.com/News/2008/BDP-Appointed-for-Retail-Elemant-of-Birminghams-New-Street-Station/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071208110233/http://www.propertymall.com/press/article/8067 to http://www.propertymall.com/press/article/8067
*Added  tag to http://www.cpbsonline.eu/pressrelease/pressrelease.aspx?companyname=CA+Group&title=All+Change+as+Contemporary+Car+Park+Fa%C3%A7ade+Transforms+Nottingham+Station
*Added  tag to http://www.networkrailmediacentre.co.uk/content/detail.aspx?releaseid=4251
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120415101006/http://www.passengerfocus.org.uk/news-and-publications/document-search/document.asp?dsid=4793 to http://www.passengerfocus.org.uk/news-and-publications/document-search/document.asp?dsid=4793
*Added  tag to http://www.passengerfocus.org.uk/Board_papers/1111/Nov%2011%20BM%206.1%29%20service%20disruption.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://nottingham.openguides.org/?Nottingham_Train_Station
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Nottingham station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160109234335/http://open.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/comm/download3.asp?dltype=inline&filename=F1127%2Fstation.doc to http://open.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/comm/download3.asp?dltype=inline&filename=F1127%2Fstation.doc
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160118054944/http://open.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/comm/download3.asp?dltype=inline&filename=F758%2Fjannottmstationful.doc to http://open.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/comm/download3.asp?dltype=inline&filename=F758%2Fjannottmstationful.doc
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040829124328/http://open.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/comm/download3.asp?dltype=inline&filename=F4669%2Fstationmp0902.doc to http://open.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/comm/download3.asp?dltype=inline&filename=F4669%2Fstationmp0902.doc
*Added  tag to http://www.rail.co/2011/03/07/improvements-at-nottingham-station-begin/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160109234335/http://open.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/comm/download3.asp?dltype=inline&filename=38970%2F170709railissues.doc to http://open.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/comm/download3.asp?dltype=inline&filename=38970%2F170709railissues.doc
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160101192045/http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browse20documentsStrategicBusinessPlanDelivery20Plan2010Enhancements20programme20statement20of20scope20outputs20and20milestones20%28June20201020Update%29.pdf to http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browse20documentsStrategicBusinessPlanDelivery20Plan2010Enhancements20programme20statement20of20scope20outputs20and20milestones20%28June20201020Update%29.pdf
*Added  tag to http://itsacr02a.nottscc.gov.uk/apps/pr/diary/memdiary.nsf/0/b61a5c3e48154ca3802572cd00364d19/%24FILE/R08_Rail%20issues%20final.pdf
*Added  tag to http://plan4.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/WAM/pas/showCaseFile.do?appNumber=10%2F00885%2FLLIS1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Nottingham station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Transport-Minister-announces-ahead-163-60m-station-revamp/story-12255019-detail/story.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130322173300/http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/163-67m-station-revamp-deal-close/story-12248473-detail/story.html to http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/163-67m-station-revamp-deal-close/story-12248473-detail/story.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120519022104/http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Train-station-car-park-opens/story-16086937-detail/story.html to http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Train-station-car-park-opens/story-16086937-detail/story.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120519022104/http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Train-station-car-park-opens/story-16086937-detail/story.html to http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Train-station-car-park-opens/story-16086937-detail/story.html
*Added  tag to http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Designs-approved-biggest-city-rail-upgrade-100-years/story-12186091-detail/story.html
*Added  tag to http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Fare-dodge-crackdown-train-station/story-12192882-detail/story.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130322173256/http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Historic-footpath-saved-walkers/story-14155089-detail/story.html to http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/Historic-footpath-saved-walkers/story-14155089-detail/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:01, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified