Talk:Danielle Pletka

message: As Vice President of the American Enterprise Institute Danielle Pletka cannot be described as a 'non-notable person' under WP:BIO guidelines. The American Enterprise Institute is one of the US's most influential think tanks. The AEI was one of the most prominent supporters of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, during which time Ms Pletka was its Iraq specialist. Ms Pletka has been the subject of numerous articles and her own writing features in publications such as the Washington Post. 
Therefore template removed. 
Tango & Cash 20:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Danielle Pletka appears on Meet the Press with Chuck Todd.    MaynardClark (talk) 17:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

text: Danielle Pletka continues to appear on Meet the Press with Chuck Todd.  MaynardClark (talk) 15:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-notable person per WP:BIO  

message: is this person jewish ??  do not see any religion cited.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.69.123.237 (talk) 01:31, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  anybody think it might be relevant the RELIGION of this person??? 

message: An editor removed RS content on Pletka's climate change denialism. The editor claimed the text was unreadable without elaborating and without the slightest attempt to tweak the text. This is the text, which seems perfectly readable: "She rejects the scientific consensus on climate change. In November 2018, NBC's sunday morning show Meet the Press was criticized for its decision to book her on its show and let her cast doubt on the science behind a recently released by the US government on the massive economic damages caused by climate change". Snooganssnoogans (talk) 00:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, I'm the editor. Exhibit A: "was criticized for its decision to book her on its show and let her cast doubt on the science behind a recently released by the US government on the massive economic damages caused by climate change." That is all. KidAd (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Why were you incapable of fixing the text in question if this bothered you so greatly? Is this a sufficient tweak?: "was criticized for having her appear on the show where she cast doubt on the science behind a recently released report by the US government on the massive economic damages caused by climate change". Snooganssnoogans (talk) 01:06, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm happy to write for you, I just wanted to give you a chance to fix your mistakes before you launched yourself on another edit war. KidAd (talk) 01:13, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

text: I does, however, say that she "cast doubt on the scientific validity behind a recently-released report by the U.S. government on projected economic damages caused by climate change" KidAd (talk) 01:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's a difference between that and clarifying that she rejects the scientific consensus on climate change, which WP:FRINGE clearly says we ought to say. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 01:26, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Including both would be redundant. KidAd (talk) 01:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought this had been decided. KidAd (talk) 15:49, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

text: The deletion of the text saying she disagrees with the consensus is whitewashing and WP:PROFRINGE editing. The statement does not "speak for itself". --Hob Gadling (talk) 21:25, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate change 

message: I have expanded the views and political opinions section. Please use the talk page if there are issues with specific content being added.Aleaiactm (talk) 17:54, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Views and Political Opinions