lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lavochkin-Gorbunov-Goudkov LaGG-3

message: Why is it "Goudkov"? It should be just "Gudkov" Pibwl 15:51, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, I moved the article. MoRsE 06:04, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: Sorry in advance for the double posting. I asked this question at La-5 and got nothing...
In late March 1943, a mock dogfight was held between a recent Lavochkin and two Lend-Lease fighter types. The US and UK types fared quite well. Which Lavochkin variant took part in this display? The story here says it was a LaGG-3, but the timing seems wrong to me. Binksternet (talk) 14:53, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Which variant arrived late March 1943?
Talk:Caramac

message: the bar is thin due to its sweet taste
Er — how does tasting sweet make the bar thin..? --Picapica 16:07, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The whole section dedicated to Hawaiian Carmacs is written in a heavily biased, although quite hilarious way. If anyone has more information on this "hawaiian decadence", I'd suggest adding it up and cleaning the spot up... 189.160.144.5 (talk) 13:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "They are Hawaiian decadence."

message: I am 95% sure this article has been defaced. 87.112.37.14 (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam

message: Caramac is a vernacular UK description, verging on the brink of non-PC, for a mixed race person of pale brown or golden-brown complexion. Not considered pejorative or hate-speech as such, it is commonly associated with the innocent and not intentionally offensive language of older people. Nuttyskin (talk) 20:17, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural Reference
Template talk:PD-UKGov

message: This template refers to the 1956 and 1988 duration of copyright in the UK, but hasn't this been increased (retroactively) to seventy years? Can't find the reference at the moment, and I'm 1000 km from the nearest UK law library... Physchim62 11:51, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ordinary copyrights have been increased by 20 years retrospectively. That happened in 1995. Crown copyright operates under a set of different duration rules and its length has not been increased. David Newton 13:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duration of copyright in the UK 

message: Is this basically the expired version of ? I find it interesting that this template links to Crown copyright but doesn't actually mention it anywhere. Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 00:11, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  relation to {{tl|CrownCopyright}} 

message: Also, the commons template commons:Template:PD-BritishGov just says more that 50 years ago. Should this be changed to 1956, and then each January increment the year? Because unless 1956 is significant, "more than 50 years ago" actually seems a more convenient way to put it. pfctdayelise (translate?) 00:14, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The commons template has switched back to use "1956", but they do it with an #expr statement in the template, so it doesn't need constant updating, like so:  "prior to ".   Does it seem like a good idea to change this template to match?  Carl Lindberg 07:42, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons template 

message: Surely Crown Copyright lasts until the end of the year in which 50 years have elapsed since publication? That means that at this point, the cutoff date is 31 December 1957. Since the "50-year" cutoff now reaches a point more recent than 1 June 1957, isn't the "1 June" condition now rather irrelevant? 86.143.48.55 (talk) 03:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "before 1 June 1957"?
Talk:Brown Sugar (D'Angelo album)

message: Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. Chicago Tribune (Johnson, Martin. 6. August 17, 1995) review of Brown Sugar (1995):
Dan56 (talk) 10:06, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Chicago Tribune review

message: This article is brilliantly complete and cites sources for every claim or fact made 'n I was quite surprised to see that it's not a featured article or even a "Good" article. Someone affix that accolade up there. NIRVANA2764 (talk) 04:23, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is excellent 
Talk:Watch Out! (Alexisonfire album)

message: Just like Crisis, I have rewritten the article so that the miscilania section was removed and incorporated into the body. It is a guideline of Wikipedia to avoid trivia-like sections, so this was the reason for this. Besides, it improves the integrity and quality of the article. -- Reaper  X 19:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major rewrite and removal of Miscilenia (I cant even spell it)
Talk:Hal Douglas

message: What does "sending himself up" mean?
--sparkit 16:54, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: His voice is similar to Don LaFontaine's.
But
He has been described by a Miramax publicist as "perhaps the most recognizable trailer voice in the business
can't be that recognizable then really Jackliddle 20:41, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar to [[Don LaFontaine]] 

message: Greetings!  Forgive my extreme newbieness — I'm not even sure I'm discussing correctly. =)
So, under Radio, it sez: Hal also does work for I95.5 FM in Trinidad and Tobago.
What would be an acceptable citation?  Listening to the stream, I'm able to identify Hal Douglas' voice on a news promo running on I95.5.  Of course, I don't identify voices as a profession, but I do work in radio, which is close. =) Thanks in advance, eh?  Buddypedia 22:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed? 

message: The external link http://www.cedpromos.com/PromoTrailerAudio/Douglas,%20Hal-Promo.mp3 is dead.
--24.205.93.38 (talk) 22:21, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead Link 
Talk:Imatto-canna

message: Is it fair to say that this is a "nonexistent" Japanese syllabary, and to generally represent Kaempfer as having made a blunder? In this article "Imatto-canna" are equated with hentaigana, and the hentaigana article is very clear that such characters did exist, and were distinct from what it calls "standard" hiragana. So it seems to me, based on this information, that Kaempfer was, at that time, probably correct to identify three syllabaries. 86.161.61.185 (talk) 23:57, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "non-existent"? 

message: Please move it to Yamato-kana, which was spelled by Kaempfer as "Jamatto-canna" following the German writing traditions of his time. The double consonants tt and nn indicate that the previous vowel is a short vowel. 61.203.208.95 (talk) 02:33, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that in sources, or an "original synthesis"? -- AnonMoos (talk) 09:34, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yamato-kana
Talk:Interactive computing

message: The title of this article could be either:
* Interactive computing
* Interactive programming
* Interactive program
* Interactive processing
* Interactive application
I'm not sure which is best.  I choose "--computing" just because it was used in the empty link I followed in CMS.  I haven't created redirect from the rest of these, because doing that would make it harder to rename (move) this article if we decide on a different name.  Any thoughts?  --A D Monroe III 17:18, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name? 
Talk:Cubic foot

message: I'm packing for a move to Singapore. The items I'm taking have to fit into a 56 cubic ft container. How do I figure the dimensions of the container?
Ellen   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.199.168.120 (talk) 19:05, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't, because you can't. How can they say there were no stupid questions? Christoph Päper 20:25, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Media is using .....quesec water discharged from ..... dam. I wish to know what is quesec? 
Kumar Jitendra, Patna
kjj_info@rediffmail.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.43.243 (talk) 15:49, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  quesec 

message: I propose that Cubic foot per second and Cubic feet per minute be merged into this article. Lightmouse (talk) 11:56, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Peter Dinklage

message: I would change it myself, but this is listed as a "good article".  Right now, it lists his height as 5'9".  But both sources (http://www.bbc.co.uk/films/2004/03/12/peter_dinklage_the_station_agent_interview.shtml and https://web.archive.org/web/20140813023823/https://www.sfgate.com/movies/article/Station-actor-draws-big-attention-Peter-2553746.php) list his height as 4'5".  Elsewhere in the article, it says 4'5" is his height.  Clearly this is a mistake!  2604:2D80:5504:F100:70D4:4A50:DB38:3A46 (talk) 00:42, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found a clear mistake underneath Peter Dinklage's picture
Category talk:Television news shows

message: The name of this category is a little odd. Wouldn't "Television news" or "Television news program(me)s" be better? -- Picapica 17:46, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved at last! Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 April 16#Category:News television series – Fayenatic London 08:20, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Category name
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Dr Zen/Proposed decision

message: Hi ladies and gentlemen, I was wondering whether the proposed prohibition of removing the clitoris image applies to linking that image via the  template as well? TIMBO (T A L K) 17:47, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed the wording to be more explicit on this issue. Nohat 07:13, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. All other editors are permitted to make whatever changes to the clitoris article that they deem appropriate. Of course, if an editor violates Wikipedia policy and obstinately refuses to correct their behavior, then they may be subject to similar restrictions if their case is brought before the Arbitration Committee. We don't rule on content disputes: we are only finding that the current consensus is to keep the picture, and Dr Zen is acting against that consensus. As I said in my vote on the prohibition, if consensus comes to favor removing the picture, then anyone will be able to do so, except Dr Zen, who will be bound by this decision. Nohat 21:37, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Talk:Peithon

message: I expanded the ending as best as I could. There is more info about Peithon at livius.org: http://www.livius.org/pb-pem/peithon/peithon.htm It is a bit hard to figure out exactly what is going on all the time. -- Jniemenmaa 09:39, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Article reassessed and graded as stub. --dashiellx (talk) 20:08, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Grave Dancers Union

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 22:53, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Dirt speedway racing

message: The word 'countersteering' in the article was linked to the article on countersteering. However, that article refers to a meaning of the word countersteering that is exclusive to motorcycle steering and bicycle steering. 
Maybe a disambiguation is necessary, because in 4-wheel vehicle steering the word 'countersteering' is in wide use too. In the case of 4-wheel vehicle steering, 'countersteering' refers to either a slide of the vehicle that is controlled from the beginning, or to the steering necessary to regain control of a vehicle that has unexpectedly started to slide. If the rear end of the vehicle has broken out, the front wheels must be kept pointing in the direction of motion. (Details depending on whether the vehicle is a front wheel drive, rear wheel drive, or 4-wheel drive.) --Cleon Teunissen | Talk 18:54, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Statute of frauds

message: This Wiki article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_frauds) should probably be merged with this Wiki article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_Frauds), which is also about the statute of frauds.
It looks like this suggestion has been lingering for a year, perhaps longer. This article (Statute of frauds is general in nature, the other Statute of Frauds is about a specific U.K. law. The other might be better titled to avoid confusion, and there may be an argument to merge that article into this one (under United Kingdom, but this article should be preserved as the one that addresses the statutes of frauds from all nations (not just the U.K.).Arllaw (talk) 15:23, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Suggestion

message: The article says that "The title comes from the so-called "bad act" that the law proposes to prevent - the perpetration of fraud. This is not the case with most laws. For example, most jurisdictions have laws proscribing theft. However, none of these laws are called the "statute of theft." In fact, such laws against theft generally follow the standard practice of simply not having an informal, descriptive title."
I really do not understand this. There are a large numer of statutes with such titles - for example (and in no particular order): (a) the Theft Act 1968, (b) the Theft Act 1978, (c) the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, (d) the Malicious Damage Act 1861, (e) the Criminal Damage Act 1971, (f) the Treason Act 1351, (g) the Fraud Act 2006.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.8.104.74 (talk) 17:33, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "UCC section 1-206 also contains a "catch-all" statute of frauds"  --- what is UCC? does this refer to  United States Law? perhaps this could be made more clear.
:Yes, it does - I am not aware of any other jurisdiction which has adopted the UCC, although it's certainly been influential. Ellsworth 13:58, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: UCC stands for the Uniform Commercial Code, which has been adopted in all 50 states. 24.6.66.193 03:07, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UCC? 

message: This article says that 1677 c.3 is 'more properly called the Statutes of Frauds and Perjuries'. As far as I am aware the short title of that Act is 'the Statute of Frauds', which was given to it by the Short Titles Act 1896 (I source this from the Public General Acts 1896, HMSO; though I have to qualify this by saying that SLD claim that the short title awarded was 'the Statute of Frauds 1677').  —Preceding unsigned comment added by James500 (talk • contribs) 09:42, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the 1677 Act should be called 

message: The 2003 revision has increased the threshold for the requirement that a contract be in written form from $500 to $5000 - as can be verified by Cornell Law: http://www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/2/article2.htm#s2-201 Dsciacca (talk) 07:32, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2003 Revision to the Statute
Talk:Tom Shear

message: --Dr who1975 (talk) 16:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox

message: Hi, folks:
The source for much of the early biographical information was from Tom Shear himself via e-mail (original Wikipedia research!); the rest was from several web articles and interviews, the most important of which will be listed as sources by the time I'm through. --X3non 19:22, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hello

message: I think that the Assemblage 23 section of this article should be moved into the Assemblage 23 page. Any thoughts? Keytar Shredder (talk) 13:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assemblage 23
Talk:Geography of Kuwait

message: Queen Rania the most loved women form Kuwait lives in Jordan wiht her husband King Abdullah and her children
: I don't see what this has to do with the article? Please explain? WMustafaT (talk) 15:48, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Hello,
I edited the page by correcting the English and reorganizing some things. Some of the sentences were awkwardly phrased, so that's mainly what I focused on. I also added links to other Wikipedia pages where I felt it was necessary.
One thing I don't understand that was on the page was the following:
It is believed to be the outermost point of the ancient civilization of Dilmun, which was centered in what is present-day Bahrain. Faylakah is the site of an ancient Greek temple built by the forces of Alexander the Great.
I deleted this as it made little sense in the section it was. Someone else should perhaps look over this. 
Constructive criticism is appreciated - we can discuss what I can do to help improve this article in general. 
 
Thanks!
WMustafaT (talk) 15:47, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing this page 

message: A divided zone? I never heard anyone call it divided zone.Please look into it .Lemonmelonsuperstar (talk) 15:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Divided Zone? 
Category talk:Confidence tricksters

message: Perhaps this article should be titled "Unsuccessful Confidence Tricksters" or "Naive Confidence Tricksters", since successful con men (and women) would never have been detected as such, or, if detected, would be protected by libel laws from disclosure.  I can think of some schemes widely advertised on TV that I would term con games.  Included would surely be all the "credit repair" and "debt consolidation" schemes.  Also many of the things advertised as being sold with "money back guarantees" depend upon the fact that claiming the guarantee involves so much expense as to make it worthless.  Too Old 20:10, 2005 Mar 19 (UTC)
Isn't it POV to include psychics and telepaths in this list if their abilities have not been disproved?
:That's what I was going to say. And calling these people "confidence tricksters" may invite trouble. Vote to delete page.TinaMarieGerry 12:23, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2005

message: There is a discussion at Talk:Sathya Sai Baba#Category:Confidence tricksters about having Sathya Sai Baba in this category (and a related template). --Closeapple (talk) 03:38, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sathya Sai Baba note
Talk:Leenaun

message: The "official" spelling is Leenaun, according to the Ordnance survey of Ireland. --Red King 20:11, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Saudi Aramco

message: The figures look fake. $622 billion is impossible.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7080:A501:B9D8:4D63:A394:9EE2:9104 (talk) 21:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to update the infobox according to the 2022 annual report at https://www.aramco.com/en/investors/annual-report Chidgk1 (talk) 15:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revenue 

message: the person or government that owns aramco is the saudi arabian government and they own 90% on it 98.44.162.205 (talk) 19:43, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That is already in the infobox Chidgk1 (talk) 07:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  who owns aramco 

message: Can someone please change the ownership infobox as the remaining 10% owner of the company is named and hyperlinked as capital ship linking to an article about naval warships. IsaacTW3001 (talk) 01:33, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital ship
Talk:Skull & Bones (album)

message: Can someone write which tracks have the featured artists.  Bodachi 14:45, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I don't see a hint anywhere in the page that the album cover and title most likely references the Yale secret society, Skull and Bones. Can someone please take this into consideration in their next edit? 勇敢な要素 (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skull and Bones?
Talk:Manuel Chrysoloras

message: *Yes of course! Johnbod 20:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: The letters that Chrysoloras wrote to emperor Johannes (Epistolæ tres de comparatione veteris et novæ Romæ) do not concern a comparison with ancient and modern Rome, but rather a comparison of "Old Rome" (ἡ παλαιὰ ῾Ρώμη, i.e. on the Tiber) with "New Rome" (ἡ Νέα ῾Ρώμη, i.e. Constantinople).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.242.181.140 (talk) 15:56, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of Chrysoloras' letters in PG
Talk:Bass pedals

message: From WP:RM:
*Bass pedals → Bass pedal — Plural to singular. —Robotman1974 22:43, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:PLURAL this should be singular.  Tayste (edits) 22:13, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I came to this article looking for information about pedal-operated bass drums. Would it make sense to have a hat-note disambiguation, or am I the only person who would make this mistake? --Kierkkadon talk/contribs 19:00, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever, I added it anyway. If anybody disagrees, we can discuss it here. --Kierkkadon talk/contribs 19:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hat note about bass drums?
Talk:Nitrophosphate process

message: I've made a redirect at Nitrophosphate process.  This article should probably be moved there... I'd like an admin to do it, so all the edit history is preserved.  Discuss.
~ender 2005-03-19 14:00:MST
This article has been renamed as the result of a move request. violet/riga (t) 21:42, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: The environment has an abundance of inorganic phosphate that we believe are one of the principal causes of rapid cancer growth among the young population.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.44.92.26 (talk) 11:21, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nitrophosphate polution 

message: Apparently there are some downsides of this process, otherwise phosphogypsum wouldn't continue to be produced in megaton quantities. The article thus far doesn't make clear enough what the upsides and downsides of this and other related processes are. Hobbitschuster (talk) 09:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upsides and downsides of this process
Talk:Lise Meitner

message: Hi, the Introduction mentions twice that Meiter received numerous honors. While factually correct. I think the way it is written is redundant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.119.195.3 (talk) 20:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction includes redundant information

message: Sources say Selma Freud was the third woman to earn a doctorate in physics from Vienna.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 00:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selma Freud 

message: The Education section now says that "Her thesis ... was submitted on 28 November 1905, evaluated by Exner and Boltzmann, and approved on 28 November 1905." Obviously a Ph.D. thesis cannot be evaulated that quickly, so at least one of these dates must be wrong, but I do not have access to the cited source (Sime's 1996 book, p.398) to find the correct dates. Could someone check this out and make the correction. Dirac66 (talk) 03:34, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected the dates. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 07:05, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Thesis submitted and approved on same day???

message: There is a long Youtube video  (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl9fCfwa33c - originally a ZDF broadcast) about her role in physics.  Should it be included as additional material? Kdammers (talk) 17:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video
Talk:Solomon's Key 2

message: This article was almost the 500,000th article!
the tool assisted speedrun although not really fitting of wikipedia is very useful for anyone confused with the levels
if it ever comes to voting to remove it, i vote keep  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.209.218.183 (talk) 23:06, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Does anyone else that has played this game think it has a sokoban style of play to it?--72.80.3.148 (talk) 19:15, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Have it, and have had it for years.  It's not like Sokoban.  For one, the playfield is 2D vertical, so gravity comes into play, both in general and as a part of solving the puzzles. Second, your main ability is the creation and destruction of blocks of ice, along with the frictionless nature of them when pushed.  Lastly, the main goal is the destruction of the flames that exist on the playfield, either by sliding blocks into or dropping blocks onto them.  So, it is indeed a heavy puzzle game, but is different enough in execution to be its own type. 63.95.218.254 (talk) 13:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sokoban style?