lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:A. David Andrews

message: Enigmatic! There is a A. D. Andrews that discovered the asteroid 1727 Mette naming it after his wife. At Bloemfontein. There is a Dr. A. D. Andrews at the Armagh Observatory  in Northern Ireland. This Dr. wrote boox on spectroscopy. He (they?) is allegedly Irish. Is it the same man? Is he alive? Said: Rursus ☻ 07:26, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: HERE everything about Dr. A. D. Andrews, telescope making, flare star studies and asteroid discoveries. Said: Rursus ☻ 07:40, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: General Huh?!

message: The second para is about Boyden Observatory. Besides having been active there, the connexion to exactly flare star expert and asteroid discoverer Dr. A. D. Andrews is unclear, so it's probable the article will be split, unless it can be shown that Dr. Andrews actually administered the creation of Boyden Observatory. To be read: HERE. Said: Rursus ☻ 07:51, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And maybe also an article on GC 7066, if this star is actually noteworthy· Said: Rursus ☻ 07:59, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Maybe split
Talk:Teriimaevarua III

message: I'm confused. No sources speak of a third Teriimaevarua, but the french article have her name as Teriimaevarua III. There were two queens called Teriimaevarua and one earlier queen called Maeva-rua I. No sources ever called this woman Teriimaevarua III, only Teriimaevarua II. But there is three Maevarua's. So I don't know what to call her.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:31, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Fred Barratt

message: I note from your page you are touchy about your articles. This is well researched albeit P Wynne Thomas's Book on Notts Cricketers has all the same info. I'm afraid it needs a bit of editing from the style viewpoint. 6th form really.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brokenbiscuit (talk • contribs) 00:10, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure I and others in the cricket project would welcome any improvements you can make. I don't have the Wynne-Thomas book, so maybe it has more information. Kind regards. Johnlp (talk) 09:47, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article
Talk:Abolfadl Harawi

message: The nisba "Harawi" suggests that he was from Herat, in ancient times also known as Harawia. There are a few other historic figures with that name, all originating from Herat. I see no source to the claim that he was originally from Ray, even though he obviously worked and lived there for some time. If it is okay I would add this information about his possible origin in his article and correct the information that he was originallly from Ray, if there is no source to be found.2A02:908:1B15:ACC0:3C75:52CE:56DB:A3AF (talk) 22:12, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible origin from Herat
Talk:Asclettin, Count of Acerenza

message: :Category:11th-century European people is a container cat, but I'm unsure which subcat is appropriate for this. --Slivicon (talk) 15:58, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: French or Italian would do. Srnec (talk) 00:30, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization
Talk:Adam McLean

message: for some reason, there are two references here, A single book with no page number, and a grandpa. This is not going to work at all. Some serious cleanup needs to be done.
One particular line caught my attention:
" The more he read the original documents the more he realised that these conflicted with and in no way confirmed the speculations of esotericists, Jungians and the popular writers on such subjects of the late 20th century. "
I have studied Jung quite a lot, so I had some invested interest in this comment. I looked up what i could about what Adam Mclean had to say about Jung outside of this article (because of the poor sourcing), and I found a particular comment he made in an article about an alchemical text known as the Rosarium philosophorum, which Jung happened to studied as well. Mcleans views on Jungs interpretation of this text totally contradicts the above statement.
" The Rosarium, because of its interweaving of soul and physical alchemy, was of particular interest to the psychologist Carl G. Jung, who perhaps quoted from it in his writings upon Alchemy more than any other single text. Jung, indeed, wrote an essay on the Rosarium series of illustrations under the title 'Psychology of the Transference' which is included in Volume 16 of his collected works, and this provides us with a most valuable foundation upon which to construct an interpretation. Jung, however, only shows us 11 of the 20 illustrations. Furthermore, he suggests that figures he labels 5 and 5a (Rosarium illustrations 5 and 11) are alternative versions of the same figure, whereas on examining the full series of 20 illustrations we find this untenable. Perhaps Jung did not have access to a complete edition of the book, but that as often happens over the centuries, some of these illustrations had been removed from his copy. At any rate, Jung's interpretation is based upon seeing the illustrations as 10 stages, whereas as we have seen there are 20. Indeed, if we read again Jung's analysis of the Rosarium, with a consciousness of the existence of the extended series of 20 illustrations, we will find a further level of integration of the masculine and feminine facets of the soul, which does not contradict Jung's thesis, but amplifies and extends it.  "
Because the author of this article did not link his statement to any source, and all opinions i can find of Mclean on Jung are contradictory to the article, i'm deleting this particular section relating to Jung and the 'esotericists'. 
ProductofSociety (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicts with Jung 

message: * "caused John Granger to name" The sentence containing this is poorly written. John Granger made an evaluation of something of his own free well. No person or thing "caused" this. Please rewrite, the word "caused" brings up visions of some sort of coercion. Yworo (talk) 18:09, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: * Adjusted this. Better? Car Henkel (talk) 18:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *Much better, shorter and directly to the point. Yworo (talk) 18:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad wording
Talk:Engine Alliance GP7000

message: Is the GP 7270 a derated 7277 or are there differences in construction? 84.173.218.101 14:39, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identical to GP 7277? 
Talk:Siddha Yoga/Archive 3

message: I have read and re-read WP:CSECTION and the talk page of Wikipedia:Criticism. My understanding of the essay is that in the case of philosophy or religion articles, it is indeed appropriate to include a "Criticism" or "Controversy" section. The rationale in the essay states:  This is key, and why the controversial incidents should not be placed in the subsection, "Controversial tantric practices" nested within the "Teachings and Practices" section, as it runs contrary to the recommendations of CSECTION.
It is not unusual for an article to have a Controversy or Criticism section, there is an established precedent; see this list of 23,750 wikipedia articles for example:. Of course, not all of these are philosophy, religion or spirituality articles, but in browsing the first 500 or so, all of these articles have Controversy or Criticism sections: Christianity, Hinduism, Religion, 14th Dalai Lama, Kabbalah, Agnosticim, Talmud, Seventh-day Adventist Church, Polyamory, Mormonism, Church of Scientology, Modern Orthodox Judaism, Islamic eschatology, Hedonism, Pacisfism, Islam in the United States. There is no reason why the Siddha Yoga article should not have a separate section for this content. It does not cause undue weight as the vast majority of the article is positive. I am of the mind that a "Controversy" section should go at the bottom of the article, below History, but not embedded within History. I was encouraged at ANEW to be bold and will boldly make that change. Netherzone (talk) 17:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You've got a point; I mixed-up Siddha Yoga, and Muktananda himself. Yet, there is a differnce between criticism and controversy. And personally, I don't like criticism-sections; they invite undue pov-pushing. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:22, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , thank you for your reply. I am pretty sure the article is now in compliance with guidelines and policies. Everything is well sourced, no BLP violations, no undue weight, nor potential legal issues. I hear what you say about criticism sections potentially inviting undue POV-pushing, however, I think there are enough of us watching the article (including some admins because of the ANEW report) that they can be addressed without too much drama. Netherzone (talk) 19:47, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

text: , and thank you for keeping a cool head for so many years, even when you were misunderstood (like by me!). Thank you  for the excellent editing and finding solid reliable sources. Netherzone (talk) 22:29, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:CSECTION]] 

message: Policy permits limited use of primary (here, SYDA) sources for basic facts about an organization. That does not extend, for example, to stating how well-received a policy or event was. We should use SYDA materials very cautiously, only for facts, and always with strict neutrality. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with  that primary sources should be used sparingly, and never for promotional or advocacy purposes. Netherzone (talk) 09:38, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary sourcing
Talk:Baydu

message: "He was urged by his followers to rid himself of Ghazan", according to the article - but that sentence is the first time "Ghazan" has been mentioned. Does it mean Mahmud Ghazan, his successor? Intriguing, and would benefit from clarification. Gonzonoir (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Ghazan?
Talk:Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysical Agency

message: I just noticed the link under the first citation is no longer working. I have been unable to find an alternative citation 2001:1C02:B07:9A00:45AF:D1E1:7482:F361 (talk) 09:13, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: reference disappeared
Talk:Brunei Bay

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.iwmi.cgiar.org/wetlands/pdf/brunei.pdf and http://www.arcbc.org.ph/wetlands/brunei/brn_brubay.htm (clearly predates our usage: http://web.archive.org/web/20050317184604/http://www.arcbc.org.ph/wetlands/brunei/brn_brubay.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:12, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Batu Lawi Hill

message: So, I added a photo. But I wonder if this page would be better named "Batu Lawi" rather than "Bukit Batu Lawi". It seems (to me) that the mountain is referred to at "Batu Lawi" more than with the Bukit in the title. Can anyone from Sarawak comment? Shandartowers (talk) 21:39, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: This section cites no sources. --Bejnar (talk) 09:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Bruno Manser
Talk:Bukit Berapit Rail Tunnel

message: What is the longness of this longest tunnel ?    Tabletop (talk) 08:36, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Longness 
Talk:Bernard de Neumann

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/user/04/u2050304.shtml. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:36, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:MST

message: ----
MST can also stand for Medial Superior Temporal region of the brain, as referred to in many neuroscience journals. Should be a disambiguation page here.
Examples:
Bayerl & Neumann. (2002). Recurrent processing in the dorsal pathway underlies the robust integration and segregation of motion patterns. Journal of Vision 2, 658-658.
Ichikawa M, Masakura Y & Munechika K. (2006). Dependence of illusory motion on directional consistency in oblique components. Perception 35, 933-946.
:You're right, and there are still dozens more meanings for MST. Just check answers.com and fix the article! --maf 18:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sinamore

message: Going to totally rewrite this article as it's really barebones right now Stoats (talk) 12:00, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fritz Moravec

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:1moravec.jpg, found on :Fritz Moravec, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 17:54, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:Bud Dajo

message: Wheres located 2001:4453:21A:EA00:A9FE:6695:4ECB:96AA (talk) 11:13, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wheres located the bud dajo
Talk:David Rock

message: I suppose an article about David Rock, owner and "proprietor" of "David's farm" or Dave's farm" in London, Ontario Canada would get deleted faster than the NASIOC entry. However, since David is gaining popularity among fans and will soon have his own television show on a major television network, A Wikipedia page is needed.
David H. Rock currently has no website, however there is a "fan site" available to the fans, it was recently launched as a meeting grounds for his fans. http://www.davidsfarmrocks.com
:Why don't you request it? -09SentraSpecV (talk) 01:45, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Camiguin de Babuyanes

message: Camiguin de Babuyanes is an active stratovolcano on Camiguin Island, part of the Babuyan Islands group that is located in Luzon Strait, north of the island of Luzon, in the Philippines. The volcano and the island are within the jurisdiction of the municipality of Calayan, in the province of Cagayan. The island has a population of 5,231 people in 2020. 49.145.171.132 (talk) 13:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  science
Talk:Didicas Volcano

message: I have renamed this page from Mount Didicas to Didicas Volcano, since both references call it Didicas Volcano, and it is hardly a mountain.  --Seattle Skier (talk) 00:00, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's certainly a mountain if you measure it from its base on the seafloor Gubernatoria (talk) 02:05, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Renamed
Talk:Albert Chibnall

message: I have met Albert Chibnall's daughter and she says that his parents ran Chibnall's Bakery in Hammersmith and that Albert's 2 brothers were killed in WWI.  I can't find any Relaible Sources for this though I'm sure she is telling the truth. NBeale (talk) 14:47, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chibnall's Bakery
Talk:Mount Iriga

message: The PHIVOLCS website states the last eruptions in 1628 and 1642 but GVP contradicts this by saying "later work has shown that the collapse and eruption occurred earlier at some unknown date during the Holocene". I have left 1642 in for now but may need to be changed to Unknown if someone can figure out the exact source of this "later work". RedWolf (talk) 17:50, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last eruption
Talk:Kanlaon

message: Greetings,The local topographic map is fine, but the addition of a map of the country with the island indicated and the volcano marked would be helpful, at least to me. Does anyone have the resources and skills to do that?
Thank you for your time Wordreader (talk) 05:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Will refer this to Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines. Borgenland (talk) 05:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

text: This seems to be already in the article. Click "Show map of the Philippines" just below the image :n the infobox of the article. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 22:06, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you both very much. I appreciate it.  .^_^.  Wordreader (talk) 00:50, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of the Philippines.
Talk:St Columba's Church, London

message: "The two most recent past ministers of St Columba's Church both have served as Moderator of the General Assembly of the Church of Scotland." Who are these? – Kaihsu 11:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moderators 

message: Was this the church used in the episode of Absolutely Fabulos entitled The Last Shout Part 2? Penrithguy (talk) 10:51, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ab Fab
Talk:St George's, Hanover Square

message: The official title of the Church is St George Hanover Square, or St George's Hanover Square - and it has worldwide notability by that title. Should anyone wish to move it again, please formulate a request for discussion in the proper manner. In the unlikely event that there should be another with the same name, let's use disambiguation, not elimination. Cheers Kbthompson (talk) 17:11, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created a couple of re-directs from similar names, but certainly Hanover Square is always the disambiguator I've associated with it.  David Underdown (talk) 07:54, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved back from St George's Mayfair 

message: ::I've only ever known the church to be called 'St George's, Hanover Square', and I find 'St George Hanover Square' awkward, as the name of the church. Googling the two suggests that 'St George Hanover Square' is used mostly as part of 'the parish of St George Hanover Square'. Does anyone object to a further move (over the redirect) to St George's, Hanover Square? Xn4 00:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: The list of people married at St. George's reads from something like an old 1900 guide book. If you don't have pages for the people, take them out. If you have info that people were married there do have pages, put them in. Nobody knows who any of these people are any more.
100.15.117.207 (talk) 00:11, 10 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  not famous any more
Talk:Need to Know (newsletter)

message: Four months and one newsletter into 2007, one has to ask... is NTK dead? Or just sleeping.
Dead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jumble Jumble (talk • contribs) 13:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, why "semi-permanent" retirement? That bit needs explaining or removing. 86.132.136.32 (talk) 15:14, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:St George in the East

message: While it is probably relevant in the short-term, it probably has no long term notability. Can I ask that edits stick to the bare facts. Constant elaboration - with comments from the Daily Telegraph that had nothing to do with this attack, aren't particularly helpful. You might also look at, which makes clear that local Muslim leaders denounce the attack. Thanks. Kbthompson (talk) 19:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attack on clergy 

message: It seems like that was no (ordinary) use from 1790 onwards.  Residents there instead used St Dunstan Stepney.  Is that true? 49.145.143.152 (talk) 08:44, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  1790 onwards
Talk:George Derby (baseball)

message: George Derby's nickname was NOT Johan.   In fact he had only a sort of nickname, Jonah, because his pitching record was not that good.   Many players who had bad luck in that era were refered to as "Jonahs."   Yes, as swallowed by the biblical whale.    If someone wants a "nickname" there then it has to be "Jonah," but certainly NOT Johan, that's absurd.    Also George was born in Webster, MA, my hometown, which is why know about him, BUT his family soon moved to Wellsboro, PA, and that's where he lived his entire life when not playing baseball.   He married there and had children, but when he became very ill, he was sent to a hospital in Philadelphia.   Hence the place of his death.   You will notice that he is buried with most of his family in Wellsboro Cemetery.
  
richard tourangeau
Society for American Baseball Research  1981-- present   (member biographical committee)
Webster native  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.7.15.152 (talk) 04:46, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname error on George Derby
Talk:Alexander F. I. Forbes

message: I'm going to copy this page to my sandbox and work on it there. If there is anything I should add please let me know. Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 14:27, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 19:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intention to expand
Talk:Wizards in Winter

message: Swapped the YouTube link to the video, as the first one had poor quality and was incomplete. The new one is better and lasts full length. 13:30, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of link 

message: It's irrelevent to the article, but this website:  plays the entire song as an embeded Flash object. dogman15 (talk) 03:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Play the song anytime 

message: While there are no lyrics, there are vocals. It starts at approximately 0:57 through the song. 99.229.114.195 (talk) 01:56, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instrumental?
Talk:Gustaf Söderström

message: Concerning the sixth place in discus, Olympic Games 1900. The sources seem not to agree, did he place six or seven? Plason 14:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:George Headley

message: George headley 67.230.62.229 (talk) 19:55, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double immortal at which cricket ground in England
Talk:Musuan Peak

message: About kuwento musua peak 158.62.76.237 (talk) 12:59, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filipino