Talk:Efference copy

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 00:42, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008-02-12 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: I have posted a collaberative work that was generated as a group class assignment in "Theories of Motor Control" at the University of Maryland, College Park taught by J. Jeka, PhD.  A future post will include a list of all contributors.
Easportz (talk) 22:21, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaberative work 

message: Figures are in the process of being uploaded and will be added shortly.
Easportz (talk) 12:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figures 

message: The recent additions make this a vastly better article, on a rather important topic.  Can I suggest adding a bit of discussion of efference copy in a non-motor framework?  For example, the fact that it is impossible to tickle yourself because the tickle-detectors receive an efference copy of the motor commands that act to suppress their responses. Looie496 (talk) 17:35, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice work 

message: I suggest splitting the "Modern View" section into a new article 
* while it is important to modern ideas about efference copies, it was not in the first ones by von Holst, Mittelstaedt, and Sperry , 
* evidence for this is that the lead does not deem it necessary to mention internal models.
* the idea of internal models is important in its own right separate from its involvement with efference copies, 
* the section is self-contained and the other ones (providing a short mention of internal models replaces it) do not require it.--LittleHow (talk) 16:37, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal models 

message: ""With the rediscovery of Aristotle's observation of eye-movement-related afterimage movement, however, interaction theory reappeared towards the beginning of the 19th century, and sensory physiologists were asking why the world is perceived as stable despite the fact that its image shifts continuously across the retina (Erasmus Darwin, Stembuch, Purkyneě, Bell). The idea of ‘cancellation’ between afferent visual movement signals and corollary signals evoked by the motor compounds of gaze movement (now called efference copy signals) was first proposed by Purkyně. It was further developed during the 19th century by leading sensory physiologists such as Hering, Helmholtz, Mach and their pupils. The first block diagrams of this idea were presented by Mach (1906) and Von Uexküll (1920/1928). These concepts led to the ‘reafference principles’ of Von Holst and Mittelstaedt (1950) and Sperry (1950).""
More info here, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0001691886900399
Can we develop a small paragraph if consensus is reached.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sudhee26 (talk • contribs) 06:56, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Contribution of Dr. Purkyne (Purkinje) is missing

message: I'm doing some research for my undergrad. I was looking for information on the Corollary Discharge theory. Obviously the efferent copy is an important part of the corollary discharge theory, however, to my understanding it does not cover it completely. Does anyone know of a related page for Corollary Discharge Theory or should I begin creating a new article? Zyskes (talk) 21:48, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corollary Discharge Theory