Wikipedia talk:Style for yyyy U.S. presidential election

message: 66.167.253.89 03:42, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seen this happen as well on occasion.  It has never annoyed me enough to get me to investigate, though. — DLJessup 12:11, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor problem with Uspresidentialelections template 

message: There's an error on the 1932 election page.  Pennsylvania's electoral votes is listed on the map as 38, but it should be 36.  I don't know how to change it.
:I changed it for you. (Cardsplayer4life 04:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error on 1932 page 

message: I propose that we make and all "United States presidential election, yyyy" articles intergrated with the series header.  What I mean by this is using the template like the one used in the presidents bios, that gives the previous president(in this case, previous election) as well as a general summary.  This will make for a consistant and standard description of the elections and allow the reader to take each election in historical context with ease.  I would do it myself but 1) I am unsure of how to do it and 2) that fact that a similar idea has not been implemented seems indicative that there is some good reason not to.  Tmchk | Talk 00:28, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm for it.  A few years ago, the election results box was at the top, with links to two or three elections in either direction.  That made it easy to cruise through elections getting comparative stats.  Now, with only prose at the top, it's harder to get that context. -- RobLa 07:51, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Series/Adding Template proposal

message: There is currently an ongoing discussion about the future of this and others MoS naming style. Please consider the issues raised in the discussion and vote if you wish GnevinAWB (talk) 21:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: MoS naming style

message: It's too bad this failed. As a result we now have failure to attend to the lower level articles. See, for example, . ALL presidential elections at the state level are written in this style, endlessly repeating the material in the higher level article for each state, mindlessly. There are few editors who are interested. Mercifully, probably not very many readers either. Student7 (talk) 20:41, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: For want of a nail

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:United States presidential election, 1800#1801.  —GoldRingChip 15:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion at [[Talk:United States presidential election, 1800#1801]]

message: The depiction of the border of the part of Massachusetts that is now Maine is incorrectly depicted as the modern border for the elections 1788-89, 1792, 1796, and 1800. It is depicted correctly from 1804 onward, gaining its modern shape in 1844 after the Webster-Ashburton Treaty that ended the Aroostook War. I encourage someone who is more skilled and familiar with these maps attempt to fix this. I know it's difficult given the weird borders of the states and territories in these early elections. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:34, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depiction of Maine in the Electoral Maps