Talk:Barczewo

message: W. Zenderowski runs a private webpage on Barczewo . I don't think this is a reliable source. HerkusMonte (talk) 13:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: How does running a private webpage make him unreliable? We aren't using it anyway.Btw:could you answer about quotes from unknown person Irma Bartlick in the other article?--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 13:39, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

text: He has an article on pl wiki (:pl:Wojciech Zenderowski). No major red flags as I can see. Amateur/local historian publishing in regional publication, nothing cited to him seems extraordinary/fringe, through I NPOVed the tone of the sentence. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:56, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Should only be used if attributed (which it is presently) - and even then borderline. A better source (e.g. an English language history book) on such a contentious topic should be preferred.Icewhiz (talk) 04:17, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zenderowski  

message: Why is Polish majority which formed the integral history of the city moved into separate place from main history? This goes against normal format of articles.
--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 13:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the article needs some structure, a subsection focusing on a certain aspect of history improves the readability. HerkusMonte (talk) 08:15, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

text: An article needs some structure to improve the readability. Large sections of text are extremely tedious. HerkusMonte (talk) 08:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

text: It took a few years, but I merged this into a single section. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:56, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are Poles seperated from main history 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Barczewo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120426085516/http://ramsko.webd.pl/umb2011/index.php/historia/3-historia to http://ramsko.webd.pl/umb2011/index.php/historia/3-historia
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:06, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Barczewo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426085516/http://ramsko.webd.pl/umb2011/index.php/historia/3-historia to http://ramsko.webd.pl/umb2011/index.php/historia/3-historia
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Text such as  - besides contradicting most or all Holocaust scholars (who generally see some differences between Nazi atrocities towards Poles and Jews) is cited to the town's webpage which is not a RS for WWII history, and per my reading does not contain this very unusual "fact".Icewhiz (talk) 04:05, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: - as you last restored this text, I'd appreciate if you could address this. Icewhiz (talk) 07:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Poor generalization, removed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:07, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious text