Talk:Pokémon/Archive 1

message: was formerly listed as a good article, but was removed from the listing because the article fails to cite its references. --Allen3 talk 23:17, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: {{BASEPAGENAME}} removed from [[Wikipedia:Good articles]]

message: Please, let's use third person. It is more professional. WhisperToMe 01:53, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third person 

message: What's this? 
"Many Protestant Christian groups in the United States believe Pokémon to be Satanic in origin. After the US release of Pokémon Yellow, there was a sudden widespread criticism of it passed through Christian congregations primarily by word-of-mouth. Most people believe these claims to be nonsense, and note that they are spread as urban legends. While this criticism has been a widespread phenomenon in the United States, little about it has been committed to print. It would be incorrect to state that the Christian religious community has an official opinion on this, but its widespread nature makes it a legitimate topic of study.
Pokémon has been criticised by some members of the Jewish community for its use of the swastika, the most widely known symbol of Nazism. Nintendo says that this is a matter of cultural misunderstanding, as the swastika used to be used in East Asian cultures as a symbol for "good fortune" by the Buddhist religion. If a Japanese map of any major city is examined, little clockwise swastikas, or "manji", where Buddhist temples are located, can be seen. Many Jewish groups hold that it is inappropriate to use this symbol on children's toys.
The manji was shown only on a Japanese version card and was excluded from the North American release with due consideration of the cross-cultural issue. However, these Jewish members attacked the Japanese version distributed in the U.S. by unauthorized import. As a result of this controversy Nintendo stopped using this symbol even in the Japanese version. [1] (http://www.adl.org/presrele/Mise_00/3511_00.asp) This raised a public backlash in Japan.
Many Islamic religious speakers in the Arab-Muslim nations of Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt hold that Pokémon is part of a "Jewish conspiracy" to corrupt Muslim children. They claim that the word "Pokeman" is a Japanese word which means "I am Jewish" (this claim is patently false). One Saudi Arabian Sheikh (Sheikh Abdel Moneim Abu Zant) has written "The Pokémon craze is a Jewish plot aimed at forcing our children to forgo their faith and values and to distract them from more important things such as scientific ambitions." The Anti-Defamation League has spoken out against these conspiracy theorists. [2] (http://www.adl.org/presrele/IslME_62/3791_62.asp)
Parallels have frequently been drawn between Satanism and Pokémon. This is covered at Satanism and Pokémon"
:This is poor writing, on many levels. So many weasel words and unattributed sources! How can I take this seriously?! Then again, this is an article about Pokemon. - Ta bu shi da yu 09:46, 13 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Christians are freaky.Rolinator 11:53, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: Well, I just went on a major minior and minor-ish cleanup effort through the article.  I got confused about some things, noted some data deficiancies in other places, and figured I'd ask for clarification/help here.
*When were Yellow, Gold/Silver, and Crystal released in Europe?
*"The plot of Gold, Silver, and Crystal takes place three years after the first series. Again, the characters' only official names are colors of the versions, but now there are no pre-set names for the rival." What's the male chracter's name, Gold or Silver?  Or is he called Gold in Gold and Silver and Silver?
*Under the "Other Pokémon games"  header: "Some are not even video games." What ones?  
**Also, I wonder if Pokémon Colosseum counts as an offshoot or not.  It does have a rather different storyline from the Gambe Boy/Advance RPGs, but, unlike the other offshoots, it has trading compatibility with the others, unless of course Pokémon Stadium 2's Pokémon gifts count as trading compatibility.
*Under the anime header: "The English version of the series uses Pokémon under various subtitles." ...er, what? This sentence just confuses me; I can't tell what this is reffering to. --Sparky the Seventh Chaos 06:43, Dec 29, 2004 (UTC)
*Umm...subtitle for example "Pokemon Advanced" etc. --Zxcvbnm 18:24, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Few questions. 

message: Wow, this article is getting big. ...has been big for some time. Thirty-nine kilobytes? I say we need to trim this pup a bit. Here's my suggestions.
*Move the section about Mr. Satoshi Tajiri over to Satoshi Tajiri. I think there's more info here than there is in his biographical article.
*Maybe make an article dedicated to the games in the same vein as Pokémon (anime). Pokémon (video games), perhaps, and have a paragraph or two about the games here, i.e. saying they main games in the series are mostly for various Game Boy systems, there's a lot of offshoots, and so on.
That's... about it. I think that'd cut down the article to more manageable levels. --Sparky the Seventh Chaos 00:21, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
----
Why was the mentioning of Pokémon thriving in all age groups in Japan removed? A.K.R. 06:46, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs some trimming. 

message: I have a concern about the notes on pronunciation in the opening paragraph. Pokémon, being a japanese word, I would think it would have a short 'e' sound. Not the 'ay' or 'ee' sound that the article mentions.  These may be the popular english pronunciations.  I just question whether they are the correct pronunciation. --Randolph 04:34, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It would probably be the "correct" english pronunciation, however, you're correct that the sound is a short 'e' in the Japanese (The characters read po-ke-mo-n). --Mukashi 00:58, 2005 Mar 31 (UTC)
However, it's unscientific in any way.  Using the International Phonetic Alphabet, we'd have different standard pronunciations for "Pokémon" in Japanese and English.  In English, the first "o" tends to be dipthongized to [oU] or [ow] (from the Japanese [O], the open-mid back rounded vowel - think the "au" in haul), while the e is either dipthongized to [eI] or [ej] (think the "ei" in eight), made into an [i] (think the "e" in fee), or reduced to a schwa (in Japanese, it is an [E],the open-mid front unrounded vowel - think the "e" in pet).  The syllable stress is also different (on "po" in Japanese, on "ke" in English, due to both the speech patterns of the respective languages and the fact that "Pokémon" is thought to be a portmanteau in Japanese while a made-up word in English). 
In short, we have (using X-SAMPA transliteration) [pOkEmOn] in Japanese while we have [poUkeImOn], [powkejmOn], [powk@mOn]/[poUk@mOn] or even [poUkimon]/[powkimon] (less acceptable).  It's not a matter of short or long vowels - it's just that in English we use dipthongs a lot.
kelvSYC 01:50, 31 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation 

message: Please note that the Jynx controversy is mentioned in the Jynx article, and does not need to be duplicated here. A Man In Black 19:07, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jynx/Blackface Controversy 

message: PS: You know the Pokeballs and stuff like that. I suggest a separate page for that. Or perhaps, a separate page for "Pokemon Items" and "Game Mechanics".
Also, the "List of POkemon" is just wierd. Why don't we put "Pokedex", then sort them out in Numbers and Alphabetical orders.
:A list of items is a good idea, but not one of mechanics, that'd grow too Wikibooks-ish.
:Calling it Pokedex is a bad idea, because people will expect it to be dynamic and interactive with sorting functions and clicky buttons and other cool crap like the fansites' ones have. This will just be plain text. And the "List of xxx" is the standard for stuff here. See Wikipedia:Pokeprosal for more. Master Thief Garrett 10:47, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re Overcrowding 

message: I suspect that most people who reach this article by typing something in the Go box type "Pokemon," rather than "Pokémon."  However, I don't understand why it's necessary to have a message that says "Pokemon redirects here due to technical limitations."  (This is Template:TLD.)  That doesn't even sound like an accurate statement: The redirect is not due to technical limitations; it's due to people either not knowing that Pokémon has an accent, or not bothering to type it.  I've gone ahead and removed the message.  If someone knows of a good reason for bringing it back, please post here.  --LostLeviathan 22:25, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect due to "technical limitations" 

message: On this page it says Computer Soldier Porygon", see Banned episodes of Pokémon was the cause for the 685 health problems or whatever. But on the banned episodes page it says the episode was called Electric Soldier Porygon not Computer, could someone please fix this. I can't as I'm not experinced with this.--60.226.28.162 01:13, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically, neither is correct - both are translations of the original title Dennou senshi Porygon.  Dennou may refer to computers or electronics in general, IIRC, so both are technically correct translations. kelvSYC 04:48, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And, since it didn't get an official translation, either one is equally good. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 05:40, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Now some food for thought: Dennou in the title is done in kana, to reflect limited Japanese text ability on the GB/GBC.  The corresponding kanji would have been 電脳.  Most electronic J to E dictionaries would translate it as "computer". kelvSYC 05:55, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Info

message: * I wonder if it is better to put the "Religious controversy" into a seperate page and providing a link on the main page?
Same thing we did for the racial controversy thing. Because, the religion section was indeed quite a lot.
I don't see a clear break-out target for it. The "racial controversy" was moved to the page of the specific Pokémon in question, but I don't see where the sundry religious controversies could be merged. - A Man In Black (conspire | past ops) 17:33, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over Crowding 

message: Rod Lockwood asked the following question on the Wikipedia:Reference desk/Humanities page .
I have found a conflict of information about who created Pokémon, but I have found no reference to the president of Creatures, Inc. (now Pokémon, Inc.), Tsunekazu Ishihara. I could not find any place to request an article. All paths lead only to requested articles which is not the same thing. There also was no catagory or sub-category for Pokémon under video games. Also, in the Pokémon group of articles there is no mention of Creatures/Pokémon, Inc even though Media Factory is mentioned.
Rod Lockwood
If you can provide any advice about this, it would be appreciated. Capitalistroadster 07:18, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference Desk Question on Pokemon creator

message: This might make a nice reference: "Pikachu's Global Adventure: The Rise and Fall of Pokemon." Check it out! --Nymph 22:05, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Book

message: Pokémon has only belatedly made its way to the Islamic world. Some Muslim officials now claim that the word "Pokémon" means "I am a Jew" in Japanese, and believe the toy craze is part of a Jewish-Zionist conspiracy to turn Arab children away from Islam. A fatwa, or religious edict, issued by a Saudi sheik urges all Muslims to beware of the game, noting that most of the cards bear "six-pointed stars, a symbol of international Zionism and the state of Israel."
Salon.com is (sadly) not an authoritative source, and it would be nice to see *which* 'random sheikh' issued a fatwa, and *who* says that it means "I am a Jew". Sherurcij 16:22, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Plz reference or remove

message: I'll go out on a limb here and put this into the Good Articles list. It's a new feature that identifies articles that conform to a lot of the FA statuses and can be improved upon. In fact, the German Pokemon article is featured, and I think with enough tweaking of facts and checking for errors and fixing things, this page should see similar status in the future. Toastypk 06:00, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't thinkl that that's ever going to happen. Because of its high vandalism levels, it'll never be "stable" - one of the FA requirements. --Celestianpower háblame 09:54, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't think vandalism counts as making the article unstable as long as there are enough editors to make sure none slips through.  I think the stability criteria is intended to prevent something like the Christmas debacle, which happened just days before it was to be featured on the Main Page (see Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Christmas).  --AySz88^-^ 17:07, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding to Good Articles list. 

message: This is a very neat article/section. It brings back memories. I like it. I find it organized.--Depakote 02:09, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think it's very good. According to Allen3 it can not be a good article because it doesn't cite its sources. That's a real shame, but sincere I think. I wonder, for example, where all that information from the Controversy section comes from.It's also regulary noted that this article lacks stability due to the large amount of vandalism, which is an even bigger shame. 82.217.240.47 19:59, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Stability actually refers to non-vandalism edits.  You can't do anything to the article short of protecting it to pre-emptivly deal with vandals. Fieari 02:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If citing is what is needed, I say go for it. Be bold! Toastypk 20:12, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neat Article 

message: Here are my comments on what really needs to be done to clean up and make this article so much better.
1) This article runs through the video games twice.  Well, one section links to Pokémon (video games) which is where things SHOULD be, but there is a section that is completely redundant by listing all the "generations" in the main article.  Why have the Pokémon (video games) page if we are still going to list everything on the main page?  I suggestion moving the "generations" section into the video games page.
2) If we have a Pokémon (anime) page, why do we list so much anime information on this page?  We should collapse it down and merge all the information into the anime page.  it should be very much like the Card Game entry.  A couple paragraphs with the link above it to the main article. Eric42 17:35, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  Very yes.  I know the article being huge was one reason for creating Pokémon (video games) in the first place, but then people kept inserting more info into the main page.  Maybe there needs to be a commented-out note? --Sparky Lurkdragon 21:24, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

text: The generations section was originally much shorter and more general, without all the game-specific info. I really should rewrite it to return to that state. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 00:12, 19 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I disagree. I think indicating the differences between the games in each generation is important to undertanding how the franchise has evolved( no pun intended), because the changes to the games are usually reflected in other media. -- WikidSmaht (talk) 01:11, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it was originally focused only on the differences between the generations shared through all the media. As such, there was a mention of the new types in the GSC gen and Pokémon contests in RSFRLG, but not the Pokégear or detailed descriptions of each game. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 01:23, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large Article; Very crowded 

message: Hey,
Cheez TV no longer displays Pokemon/Yu-gi-oh! etc.. It is now called Toasted TV, and shows a whole different set of programs (mainly American comic programs). I think the section on where episodes are show should be changed to reflect this.
129.94.6.28 00:25, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheese TV was awesome JayKeaton 12:40, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheez TV no longer airs 

message: I've removed this little bit from the controversy section:
An early episode featuring a bathing suit contest (featuring an under-18 Misty, not to mention Ash's mom, who won!) was pulled from the series, though it was added back later as a "lost episode". Ironically, the previous episode in the series which featured a wizened crone served hand and foot by speedo-clad young boys was deemed perfectly acceptable.
It's pretty well known that the given reason that episode was pulled was because of the fake breasts James was wearing.  When it finally aired, the episode had all references to them removed yet Misty remained, so she was hardly cause for concern.  To suggest Nastina's servants were "young boys" is downright wrong, they were clearly older than the young boys who earned regular character status (Ash, Todd, Richie, Tracy).  And the part about Delia winning the contest just strikes me as out and out unnecessary.  To be honest, I don't particularly agree one bit with suggesting 4Kids Americanising the anime is controversial.  What are we to suggest they do?  Keep in Japanese references that make no sense to American viewers?  I'm not even American but I can see it's what we call "common sense" to aim it at your target market.  Frankly, I don't think I could stand watching weekly episodes of "Ooh, Satoshi-san!  You are baka!"  --L T Dangerous 16:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slight edit, further edit needed? 

message: Apart from being short for "pocket monster", is it possible that Pokemon also refers to the Japanese word bakemon(o), which of course means "monster"?  Or am I talking baka? Dave-ros 12:56, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name 

message: Should this page be semi-protected. - Plau 13:11, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Understandable. Many vandalisms here, and some of them are repeating and not done from a static ip (for example 'the boosay guy'). We could semi-protect this page for a while. Then maybe they will just take an account to do it, but at least we can give them specific warnings then, so that they can see that their changes get reverted and that it's pointless to make them.Face 17:14, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Good idea. I've kept an eye on the history for some time now, and I tell you 9 of the 10 changes made by non-members are just plain vandalisms. It are minor things, like changing the comment "Please don't delete/rename this header" into "Please delete/rename this header" and stuff like that. Little things, but if it happens 10 times a day, it's not minor anymore. So I say: yes, semi-protect this article.82.217.240.47 10:49, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I disagree. The more pages that a small group of fans/zealots protect in any way other than standard reverts, the more censored wikipedia will become. Stern vigilance, not preventionism! --67.71.1.173 06:01, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Wiki isn't censored much. Semi-protection is something exceptional, and this article has exceptionally much vandalism. Isn't preventing better then curing? I mean, there isn't much to change on this page anyway, and if there is let (loyal) members make them. And looking at the history, most edits are either vandalisms or vandalism reverts.Face 18:40, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree with Face.  There have been about six cases of vandalism in four-and-a-half days.  I'm sure it gets very tiring for anybody who must revert constantly because some people are ignorant.  I would like Wikipedia to be open to everybody.  But when the vandals cannot be banned due to changing IP addresses (I would curse AOL if I was not currently using it), the page has to have some sort of protection. PrimeCupEevee 20:46, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And most of us aren't admins! Highway Rainbow Sneakers 21:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't see any good reason to semi-protect this page. While vandalism isn't uncommon, it's not rapid-fire, and I believe very strongly that openness is more important than the dubious prospect of reducing vandalism.I won't be protecting or semi-protecting this article any time soon. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:45, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

text: I did like "ITS FUCKING POKEMON WHAT ARE YOU DOING WASTING YOUR FUCKIGN LIFE ON THIS GOD DAMN GO GET LAID!!!" Handy advice, Highway Rainbow Sneakers 00:37, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I definitely have to agree with you.  Also note the closeness between the vandal's post and my last edit. Presumably, the appearance in the "Recent changes" section attracted this vandal's attention.  Since we'll (hopefully) be editing this page more often, the same situation could be more frequent.PCEevee 00:46, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

text: What’s more, with so many reversiosn, the editors keep missing some things. If the vandalism isn’t stopped, things will keep slippping through the cracks.-- WikidSmaht (talk) 18:17, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Who can we shove through RfA in a week? :P  This comment is of a humorous nature and should not be brought up in any FAC/RfA or other debate/poll based on me/my edits or those who I support/nominate/object. Highway Rainbow Sneakers 18:36, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection

message: *Support -- WikidSmaht (talk) 02:28, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Straw poll

message: No more vandals! :D Thanks Cel was getting finally around to it. Cheers, Highway Rainbow Sneakers 10:22, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Result 

message: Just one question, Where pokemon is great and in where is "bad" around THIS world? -68.99.191.107 00:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh!? Mhking 00:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I remain utterly mystified. If yon chap can translate his banter into some species of English perhaps we can engage in something resembling a dialogue. -ZeroTalk 00:28, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he means: "Where in this article does it say that I think Pokémon is great but others around the world thinks it's bad?" Otherwise I'm lost, Highway Rainbow Sneakers 17:28, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, he means: "Where on this world do people think Pokémon is 'bad' (evil)?". Now that I think of it, a few countries indeed banned Pokémon. If I recall correctly, the Czech Republic was one of them, after two kids threw themselves out of the window, because they thought they had the same powers as the Pokémons they saw on tv.Face 18:19, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  We have a translator in the house! --Celestianpower háblame 18:23, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Heheh, nice. Highway Rainbow Sneakers 21:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pokemon in the World

message: I heard someone ask somebody the other day: "How do you get Pikachu on a stick?"
To which it was answered: "Pokemon!"
(me ducks for cover) --Ta bu shi da yu 17:00, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *groans and hurls fruit...* --AySz88^-^ 18:10, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When does a Pokémon go to Nurse Joy? When his Bulb-is-sore! XD Blame Jessie.. Highway Rainbow Sneakers 19:17, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you get if you cross a Pikachu with a pizza? A Pizzachu!--Face 11:53, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, this a fine discussion indeed, so here's MY input: What is black and white and red all over? A decapitated Mightyena. Erik the Appreciator 04:00, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mightyena aren't white.. Highway Rainbow Sneakers 07:21, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They are greyish-white on the under-side. What do you call a Blaziken fire-fighter? A very stupid mistake. Seven-point-Mystic 16:47, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, sorry, but I didn't have time to think about the best Pokemon to describe as "black and white", so here I'll make amends: What's black and white and red all over? A bloody Absol! (After all, it is the Disaster Pokemon.) Erik the Appreciator 16:57, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

text: And males like it? :P Highway Rainbow Sneakers 17:05, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

text: (nods) I would blame Ta bu shi da yu strictly for placing this joke here. Unforgivable. Highway Rainbow Sneakers 17:59, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, me too. And sorry for my contributing. Erik the Appreciator 18:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hehehehe, I hope I did not sound too harsh :-) But if a casual user comes here and see the jokes, next time they may try to put jokes in the main article. -- ReyBrujo 06:58, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question I heard the other day 

message: Holy cow! I had never heard of Jamie Peacock. I never saw the special, so I can't say anything from experience. We need to get the old 4Kids cast back! 71.111.215.224 22:06, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recasting Controversy 

message: i want to edit this page
Abrahim Masoodi (talk) 10:54, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not the right page to request additional user rights.If you want to suggest a change, please request this in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request. - Arjayay (talk) 15:25, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 June 2015 

message: Is this entire Franchise Pokémon set in a Far Future in Beyond.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.218.177.13 (talk) 08:25, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  is "Pokémon" franchise set in a [[Future]] of [[Timeline of the far future|Beyond]] 

message: The real name of Pokémon is Pocket Monster and Pokémon, with acronym Pokémon (POcKEt MONster). In japanese is ポケットモンスタ and the proof is http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/614BDAW826L.jpg . Pokémon now is more used for GameFreak and Nintendo, but isn't the really name.
Missing many games in the last template.
Main Serie: Pokémon Green, Pokémon Crystal and Pokémon Black 2 & White 2.
And many games of this template https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Pok%C3%A9mon_spin-offs. In other games series (or anime) the information is more complete.--201.250.50.153 (talk) 11:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. —Skyllfully (talk | contribs) 06:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

text: Not done: Closing semi-protected edit request on behalf of Skyllfully, agreed with comment. JustBerry (talk) 00:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 03 September 2015 

message: Please get rid of the miscellaneous theme park section and change it to "Spin off Games" because all of these are outside the main series of pokemon. So pokepark like there was before would be under the spin off section because it is not one of the main series pokemon games.
CrocoLava (talk) 21:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done, sorry, as a theme park is not a spin-off game. It is separate from the games altogether. All spin-off games fall under the link Pokémon video game series. The Wikipedian Penguin 03:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 November 2015