lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Lloyds Bank Canada

message: Lloyds Bank CANADA was a bank chartered by the Government of Canada that operated exclusively in Canada. This establishes a strong national tie to the article. Per WP:ENGVAR, Canadian English is the appropriate variation of English to use. Ground Zero | t 22:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. ~ RobTalk 03:34, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

text: Agreed as well. For the purposes of ENGVAR, the fact that the company was British-owned does not trump the fact that it was Canadian-based. Bearcat (talk) 14:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Use Canadian English

message: Use of the black horse device by Lloyds Bank Canada is evidenced by trademark application nos. 0559893 and 0559894. 2.24.81.243 (talk) 12:44, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The file and its corresponding non-free use rationale were removed from this article and the file's page respectively by an administrator per :Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 September 2#File:National Bank of New Zealand logo.svg. If you want clarification about the close of that discussion or otherwise feel it was incorrect, please follow :WP:CLOSECHALLENGE and discuss things with the administrator who closed the discussion. Continuing to try and re-add the file to this article or the non-free use rational the file's page is eventually going to be seen as edit warring and may lead to an administrator stepping to block any disruption as needed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:08, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Black horse
Talk:El Puerto de Liverpool

message: The number of stores described in the lede does not add up.  Nor does it match the numbers later in the article. Rhadow (talk) 11:53, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of locations
Talk:List of model aircraft manufacturers

message: There are several defunct companies in this article. 
Hawk is now part of Testors.
Frog is long gone dead - Frog models are made by Novo and Revell these days.
Aurora is long dead and I believe bought up by Revell.
Revell itself was bought up by Monogram.
Should defunct companies be taken out or left on the list (with notation?)
--Eqdoktor 04:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seem to me that change in ownership by companies needs to be provided in the list since often the kits they manufactured are re-released by new owners. This is required information to model builders. --Mrg3105 08:54, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct companies
Talk:Axis Telecom

message: In line with company name change, I think the suitable title for the article is AXIS Telekom Indonesia. Thank you for your all attention.Gsarwa (talk) 16:59, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Lion Red

message: I'm unsure on the claim made about it being featured in Once Were Warriors. If I remember rightly they drank a fictional beer in the film. Someone with the DVD should double check this statement.
No. They drink a fictional beer in Once Were Warriors. Plus the film is set in South Auckland, not the Bay of Plenty. The statement was removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.123.128.117 (talk) 00:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Knoxville Catholic High School

message: Come on, does catholic really need a wikipedia page. Shesh. And this is an advertizement for the school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.173.230.50 (talk • contribs)  
:It's become an notable school over the past five or so years, at least state-wide. Dlong 20:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cadillac Tower

message: I know that Yule Marble was used in a "43 story building" in Detroit according to the sources in that article. I tried to find in vain a 40 story builing in Detroit.  However, today I happened to be in downtown Detroit, and looked up this building in wikipedia.  This building is 37 stories above ground, and 3 stories below, the timing is right, as is the size of the building, along with the description of materials. I have not been able to figure out the name of that building, based on that description.  It isn't listed in List of tallest buildings in Detroit.  In the relevant time frame, the only other 40 story building is Cadillac Tower.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Yule Marble]] & [[David Stott Building]] & [[Cadillac Tower]]
Talk:Lindsay Corporation

message: Wow, I thought they were joking.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmwMI-cPLDQ
Oleksandr 10:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Light Serviços de Eletricidade

message: Light S.A. and Light Serviços de Eletricidade have the same History section. However, it is not clear how these companies are related, how they became separated and how the current History section is relevant. Clarification is needed about these issues. Beagel (talk) 22:31, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification needed
Talk:LiftPort Group

message: This article serves no purpose other than promotional material for the business. It's incomplete, and the sources used as references are dubious, biased or lack credibility.
Improve it, or delete it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.142.150 (talk) 10:44, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam 
Talk:Life Partners, Inc.

message: If there is a class action suit against the company that warrants mention in the article, it needs to have been covered in independent reliable sources. The website set up by the attorney representing the class for the suit is not independent and not a sufficient source. —C.Fred (talk) 21:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged class action suit? 

message: This article contains a number of inaccuracies.  The stock is worthless; all the company's assets were placed into  two separate trusts by order of the bankruptcy judge, and the company did not resume its business.  
And it is not, perhaps, obvious that most (or all) who bought policies from Life Partners were told that the life expectancy of those who were issued the policies being sold was under 36 months.  As it turned out, many original policyholders lived so long that those who bought the policies through Life Partners had to pay substantial premiums to keep the policies in force.  Some of the original policyholders are still alive after 15 years!
In short, the article reads as if written by representatives of Life Partners, Inc. C. Cerf (talk) 04:09, 23 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  PUFF PIECE
Talk:Life Is Good Company

message: Source: http://und.edu/features/2013/10/life-is-good.cfm
Should this be included?
134.129.174.250 (talk) 12:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bert Jacobs visits UND for Homecoming Week 

message: The subject of this article is "Life is Good Company". I think that Life is Good Company should be its name, with redirects from Life is good and Life is Good per WP:NCCAPS.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 18:51, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming 

message: — Assignment last updated by RAT1981 (talk) 21:25, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors English 250H VL1

message: The Philanthropy section reads like either it's been copied straight off the website or written by someone who works at the company. Definitely violates wikipedia unbiased pov policy and/or paid editing 2600:4040:25F8:3D00:C9E9:36CE:6D41:B024 (talk) 19:07, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, and I have removed it. It actually looks like its inclusion may have been the result of a Wiki Education assignment (see above). Jcejhay (talk) 19:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV of the Philanthropy section 

message: Hi, the yellow logo shown on the page is no longer the official logo. Can someone update it? Thanks! 2600:4040:70BD:3800:8155:21B6:42CF:930B (talk) 07:57, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo Needs To Be Updated
Talk:Lick's Homeburgers

message: In the late 90s Licks had the greatest burgers I'd ever tasted. But I've noticed now that they are selling the frozen Homeburger patties in grocery stores - they seem to be selling those same burgers in the stores. Gone are the giant, freshly made, tasty Homeburgers of yesteryear. Can anyone confirm this?
I've confirmed it. According to the manager at one of the stores, they use the exact same burgers that are sold at grocery stores as Homeburgers.
64.201.43.121 (talk) 20:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Happened to the Fresh Patties? 
Talk:Franchise Group, Inc

message: ==
This whole article sounds like an advertisement for the company! This can't possibly be in line with Wikipedia's policies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.180.241.75 (talk) 12:05, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

message: most of this content is without citation and can only be found online at sources written by Liberty Tax or Liberty Tax franchises for promotional purposes. 
I'm recommending removal of all content in this section that lacks citation Ericfg (talk) 21:43, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Awards section
Talk:Liberty (department store)

message: I've updated the article to take into account the closure of the Regent Street frontage. The article also needs updating with mention of their new Liberty of London brand.
Wpf (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Regent Street frontage

message: I assume the PR Department wrote this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.36.53.170 (talk) 14:49, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but it is an Ltd and it does not say anywhere that it is called "& Co.". I would move it back until there is more certainty. Gryffindor (talk) 02:07, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: ->"Turnover for 2015 is expected to be £145 million, up from £132 million in 2014"
Does "turnover" mean sales? profit? volume? This needs to be clarified.  Also, if whoever wrote this is going to include information like this then it has to be kept up-to-date. Rissa, Guild of Copy Editors  (talk) 05:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turnover
Talk:Libbey-Owens-Ford

message: 1957 – Buick Oldsmobile Cadillac Windshield and Backlight Installation manual
--2A02:A400:6148:1:90B2:A58:6F1:F3C1 (talk) 12:47, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This company invented the pannorama curved windshield
Talk:LiAZ (Russia)

message: Comments to the illustrations ("called "Lunokhod" due to low speed and power and specific shape" & "called "Skotovoz" (cattle carrier) as it was designed for transfering standing passengers during rush hour") are POV-pushing, there are no WP:RS on this. I have deleted that words. Сиркеджи (talk) 11:14, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 
Talk:LGC Ltd

message: Pulled some news and other references off to make this NPOV. There may be some Conflict of interest with some of the editors of this article, including me.
Skeptic sid (talk) 23:17, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead tree

message: Wow, no mention of criticism of any kind? I wonder who wrote the LGC Wikipedia article...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-17324912
119.237.184.184 (talk) 12:35, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism? 

message: I have added a substantial section on history from sources I can find, and as neutral as I can make it. Chemical Engineer (talk) 21:10, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:St. Paul's Choir School

message: Though I am sure that this is a fine school, I am still concerned that it is not notable enough for an independent Wikipedia article, per WP:MUSIC.  Is there any indication that the choir has received notice outside of the Boston area?  Has it won any major awards, gone on tour?  If so, sources on this would be appreciated.  If not, I recommend merging the information in this article into some other article on Wikipedia, such as one of the Boston articles. --Elonka 20:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability concerns

message: Wikipedia is not an advertising medium. (See WP:NOT.) It's intended to be an encyclopedia presenting verifiable information from independent published sources.  I have cut out the section on "Auditions" because the material was not suitable for an encyclopedia. It was promotional in tone and was not supported by references from published sources.  --Chonak (talk) 04:20, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please avoid puffery and promotional material 

message: In the History section, it would be good to mention that the school was named Boston Archdiocesan Choir School from some-year to some-other-year.  --Chonak (talk) 21:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please mention the former name somewhere
Talk:Levi Garrett

message: The Levi Garrett Chewing Tobacco quality has gone down hill over the past 10 years while prices go up. Most of the Levi Garrett tobacco found in pouches are made up about 70% stems 30% leafs. 12.71.115.50 (talk) 17:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality
Talk:Bacchus (disambiguation)

message: This disambiguation page has been cleaned up by the disambiguation wikiproject. DesertAngel 04:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: How come Iacchus has a page at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iacchus
But going to /Bacchus takes you to a disambig page that links directly to Dionysos (sp?) and mentions nothing of the Iacchus page? I thought Iacchus and Bacchus and Dionysos were all the same, which makes having Iacchus and Dionysos on separate pages make no sense, unless we are going to have Bacchus also point to the Iacchus page.
someone wanna address this? I'm not well-versed on editing and wikipedia rules, and dont have much time other than to bring things to attention.
74.47.151.31 (talk) 22:50, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iacchus vs Bacchus
Talk:Leonidas (chocolate maker)

message: From the name of the article it seems that the article should be about Leonidas the brand but the history sections is written like it is about Leonidas the founder. I would edit the article myself but now I’m confused as to the true topic. LittleKingSquid (talk) 18:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject of Article
Talk:LensCrafters

message: they own lens crafters  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.172.127.222 (talk) 06:00, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  why no mention of luxottica 

message: I work for LensCrafters.  Would it be possible to add a reference to Luxottica acquiring U.S. Shoe in 1995 and LensCrafters joining the Luxottica Group? Thanks! http://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/18/business/luxottica-to-acquire-us-shoe-for-1.4-billion.htmlNickgilham (talk) 19:47, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of Luxottica Acquisition
Talk:Kuznia na Rybalskomu

message: ----
I am eager to work on Ukrainian shipbuilding. Does anyone object to me merging this with a stub I recently started Leninska Kuznya Shipyard? Other shipbuilding articles I've been working on include:
* Major shipyards near Nikolayev:
** Black Sea Shipyard (Mykolaiv, Ukraine)
** 61 Kommunara Shipbuilding Plant (Mykolaiv, Ukraine)
** Okean Shipyard (Oktyabr'skoye) (Mykolaiv, Ukraine)
* Other Ukrainian shipyards:
** Zaliv Shipbuilding yard / B. Ye. Butoma (Soviet Shipyard No. 532) (Kerch', Ukraine)
Suggestions on consistent look-and-feel, info boxes, and/or navigation boxes would be greatly appreciated. And of course quality checks and translations is ALWAYS appreciated!
chiefhuggybear (talk) 03:23, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Lemsip

message: Parts of this now read like an advert - it seems like someone at the company wrote it. Can we excise this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.44.63.145 (talk) 22:23, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

message: "This article has been nominated to be checked for its neutrality. (November 2010)" - This was over 3 years ago and I'm sure back then, the article was biased. But it looks fine to me now. Can I remove this "issue" template? Bilorv (talk)  16:41, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been over a month; in a couple of days I'll just be bold and remove the template if no-one weighs in. Bilorv (talk)  21:18, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Legea

message: The article says 1990, the sidebar says 1988.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.3.108.199 (talk) 15:29, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: What year was it founded?
Talk:LECG Corporation

message: "This article or section is written like an advertisement."
was the notation on the top of the page when I saw this. It read like corporate pr. 
They are a large multinational consulting firm serving business and government clients. I've added a few examples of their practice and removed puffery. In particular, they several times claimed to be independent a subjective claim probably inappropriate for a company whose primary work is providing support to corporations who pay the bill. That is not necessarily "objective", so that was an inappropriate claim. They twice claimed they were "renowned academics" when most of their regular employees are consultants/ 
I didn't have time to update financials, etc. and hope someone else does so. 
DaveBurstein (talk) 06:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, new comments, etc. belong at the bottom of the Talk page, not the top. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 13:31, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Lebanese Communication Group

message: Dear  I saw the tag to deleted the article. This article meets the criteria because I found other references that are international and discuss the company's importance and connections. Thank you for the patrolling. Geraldshields11 (talk) 22:17, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability Comment
Talk:Laurie Records

message: I proposed that Andie Records be merged with this article, unless Andie Records can be sufficiently expanded in a timely manner. - Hawkbreeze (talk) 23:26, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Andie Records into this article 

message: The following implies that the Chiffons were one of Laurie's one-off hit groups: "Being a small independent record label, Laurie's chart successes usually occurred one at a time and, for the most part, with one-off hits, as was the case with the Mystics, the Jarmels, the Chiffons, and the Royal Guardsmen." However, the Chiffons charted five times in the US top 50: "He's So Fine" (#1); "One Fine Day (#5); "A Love So Fine" (40); "I Have a Boyfriend" (#36); "Sweet Talkin' Guy" (#10); and "Nobody Knows What's Goin' on in My Mind but Me" (#49). Jackaroodave (talk) 13:46, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Chiffons not a one-off group
Talk:Western Line, Tasmania

message: Paragraph states it was a joint stock company, ref 3 shows change of status to limited liability . Hard to search on the iPad when it's bed time. --Dave Rave (talk) 09:18, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Joint stock companys are conventionally also limited liability companies. Somewhere I have the book "The Brief History of the Launceston Western Railway 1867-1904". If I can find it I'll see what I can add to the article - Peripitus (Talk) 10:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  More than just in name, that third ref is an act of parliament to cover the change --Dave Rave (talk) 10:50, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trove searching for info
Talk:Morrison Waite

message: Related to the thread directly above ("Term as Chief Justice"), I just sent the following note to Oyez.org:
Hopefully Oyez.org will fix its entry in short order. --MZMcBride (talk) 17:45, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, the more I dug into it, it seems like a glitch in their system. It's incrementing a few fields by one day for some reason. For example, Samuel Alito started January 31, 2006. Oyez.org even says so in the body text, but in the sidebar, it lists January 30 (twice). Something's afoul. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:11, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't own stock in them, and have no vested interest. I do confess to having been a guest lecturer at the school on a couple of occasions, but it's not a conflict as far as I'm concerned. I'm sure they would like to know of their glitch so they can turn it around.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:22, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oyez.org's information 
Talk:HP LaserJet

message: The memory for the 4 and 4M is 72 pin, not proprietary. I maxed the RAM on a 4M simply by breaking the presence detect 'zero ohm resistors' off the SIMM boards using a pair of needle nose pliers. The 2100 series uses proprietary 100 pin EDO SODIMMs. The 4000 series uses proprietary 100 pin SDRAM SODIMMs. Bizzybody (talk) 09:13, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  4/4M memory and other memory 

message: PostScript SIMMs are often specific to certain models. For example the PostScript SIMM for a 4 will not work in a 4+ Bizzybody (talk) 09:13, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: PostScript SIMMs

message: I noticed there's no photo of an HP LaserJet 5 on this article, or the HP LaserJet 5 article. As I own one, I could take a 10.1 megapixel photo of it. Would that be of any interest, or is that unnecessary? I also can shrink the photo if needed. Racecar56 (talk) 05:50, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  HP LaserJet 5 Picture 

message: The article first states that the first Color LaserJet was in 1994, then later says it was in 1991. Which is it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Trent021 (talk • contribs) 09:44, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Color LaserJet? 

message: This statement is no longer correct on HP newer laser printers that contain a drum system.69.36.67.122 (talk) 03:51, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  As of 2016, Canon supplies both mechanisms and cartridges for all HP's laser printers 

message: This article appears to have stagnated for almost a decade. There is a lot of detailed cataloging of ancient minutiae which are not worth updating, and at best should be split off into another article or archived. Also, none of the pictures depict much that is remotely current, and there is not much coverage of newer developments over the past decade.
The purpose of this article is to provide an overview to the HP LaserJet laser printer line and its development.  I am concerned that all the attention to old detailed trivia has overshadowed a broader historic view, and deterred editors from updating the article.  Reify-tech (talk) 23:58, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Update badly needed
Talk:Ufimsky District

message: Anyone interested in making that list in to a table? It would make it a lot more compact! -Yupik 21:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have ideas as to how such table would look like, feel free to experiment.  If you choose to do so, however, please do not forget to take into account that each selsoviet will eventually have listed not only its administrative center, but also all other rural localities in jurisdiction.  See Giaginsky District for an example of full dataset.  Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Landmark Aviation

message: Garrett Aviation-->Landmark Aviation-->StandardAero. Garrett Aviation became Landmark Aviation after a 2004 merger, and was renamed as StandardAero after a further merger in 2007. See "Dubai Aerospace Buys Standard Aero, Landmark for $1.9B," Defense Industry Daily, August 2, 2007.  So the current article should probably be renamed from Landmark Aviation to StandardAero. The company ownership remains Dubai Aerospace Enterprise.--Mack2 (talk) 04:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Then what is this company? http://www.landmarkaviation.com/ Apparently not all of Landmark became StandardAero, remaing as an airport services business. Looks like some more sources and research are needed here before making any drastic changes. - BillCJ (talk) 09:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Damn good question, Bill. Maybe a related one is whether there should be an article for StandardAero as well as Landmark. Possibly this is the Landmark that existed (and still exists) prior to Garrett Aviation being merged with it, and now that they've removed the old Garrett (and put into the "new" StandardAero, as they promote it) it's back to it's old stuff. But Landmark isn't what it used to be. Hmmm. Does need more research.--Mack2 (talk) 15:38, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New Company Name
Talk:Ronald Hugh Morrieson

message: I've marked this as high as it will be frequently accessed by students studying his work (and is not in good shape at present). dramatic (talk) 09:02, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment