Talk:The Lords of the New Church

message: Wow. Considering that The Lords were reasonably successful, and that their live performances were legendary, this article is distinctly underwhelming. Stiv gave his all in every show, often narrowly avoiding disaster, and the stage diving at a Lords show was generally awe inspiring. Don't really get that from this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 02:02, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Not So Hot

message: This article is plagiarized from the All Music Guide biography of the band.  While it has undergone wiki-like editing over the years, the paragraph structure and many exact phrases remain (what tipped me off was the phrase, "A devotee of Iggy Pop").  Don't want to delete the entry, but something should be done, maybe by someone knowledgeable about the band.  hmcnally 17:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Can't we just revert to the the edit prior to this one made on 20 December 2006 by 67.167.207.247, where the copyvio text was introduced? Lancevortex (talk) 19:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done and done. --Kurt Shaped Box 20:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/the-lords-of-the-new-church-mn0000829318. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:12, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: After cleaning up the copyright issues above, I undertook a thorough review and rewrite to make sure that material in the article was at least minimally sourced. The only content in the article that is not comfortably sourced right now is the affirmation that the band reformed. The problem with this is that I can only find anything close to reliable in the website of the lead singer who asserts that he was hired for this reformation. Self-published sources of that sort are allowed in articles about the subjects, but in this case we do not yet have proof that this person is related to the subject. I have accordingly removed him from the current members list (and put everybody else back with the older list, pending some proof there is a current line-up of the band), and I think we should consider removing the content altogether until and unless a suitable source is presented. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:36, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Verifiability of the content