lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
File talk:Frederic Chopin photo.jpeg

message: A better version is available here: http://www.er.uqam.ca/merlin/ga991424/images/compositeurs/Chopin.jpg  FranksValli 05:39, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And what's with this? http://www.chopinmusic.net/pics.php?c=2&p=1  Looks like another photo!  Possibly.  FranksValli 05:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That one actually looks more like a daguerreotype IMHO. howcheng  {chat} 16:57, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better version available 

message: To me this seems like a photo of composer and pianist Franz Liszt – see the German Wikipedia page. Also, a photo search with Google substantiates that suspicion.
Mustermaxi (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this photo showing Franz Liszt?
Talk:List of multiple-disc Nintendo GameCube games

message: I don't think The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time Master Quest really eblongs.  The two dics were separate games.  Since they were just emulated N64 titles, I'mfairly certain both would have fit on one disc if that's what Nintendo wanted to do.  THere are plenty of other two game packs that arent listed here, such as the Outlaw Golf/Darkened Skye pack or Pac-Man World 2/Pac-Man Vs.  I don't think  this should be listed either. Ace of Sevens 17:44, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should include any actual Game with two Discs. Zelda Master Quest may indeed questionable, but then again it's two diferent Versions of the same game... Maybe have a different Section for those Packages and Games?  --MStum 19:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My brother has this and I belive both games are on the same disc, and you select which one you want to play. This list refers to games that require to switch dics to continue playing. SwordfishII 16:44, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see no proof that this list refers ONLY to game that require disk swaps. Either both Zelda sets need to be listed, or Ribbit King needs to be removed (second disk isn't needed for play). -- Jelly Soup 02:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, maybe that's something to take into consideration; just because there's debate about one game doesn't mean there can't be debate about others.  Regardless of whether Master Quest belongs, Collector's Edition certainly does not because it has always been a single disc.  Personally, I vote for removing both Zeldas and Ribbit King.  Does that work for everyone? -Unknownwarrior33 21:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Legend of Zelda Colector's Edition is a case with one disc.  The Legend of Zelda "Two-Game Bonus Disc" which includes MQ and OoT is a case separately that contains only one disc.  Neither package includes two discs, and that is what the title of this article means. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.154.91.197 (talk) 08:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My mistake, I should have fact checked before adding both Zeldas. However, the problem is not yet solved. If Ribbit King remains, then a few other sets need to be added, such as the Metroid Prime + Prime 2 demo disk set. -- Jelly Soup 10:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Which games should be here?

message: I own pokémon colosseum and the other disc is a pre-order bonus(doesn't come with all copies) I'm going to take it down until some reasoning is provided. I also don't see the point in even having this article as it is of minor significance at best. Wiilanadapter (talk) 06:55, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect information
Talk:AP Comparative Government and Politics

message: This article stated that with 14,447 students, this test was the least taken exam. This is outright untrue.
In 2005, these exams were taken by less than 14,447 students:
*Computer Science A: 13,924
*Computer Science AB: 5,097
*French Literature: 1,835
*German Language: 4,621
*Human Geography: 14,139
*Latin Literature: 3,530
*Latin: Vergil: 4,362
*Music Theory: 9,887
*Physics C: Electricity and Magnetism: 11,177
*Spanish Literature: 13,712
*Studio Art: Drawing: 12,274
*Studio Art: 2-D Design: 10,111
*Studio Art: 3-D Design: 1,869
::I never wrote that it was the least taken exam. I said that it was  one of the least frequently taken exams. --GoOdCoNtEnT 18:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Wikipedia is an international project, and as such articles need to specify where they are relevant. Having to click on links to determine that an article relates to a particular institution in the United States is unencyclopaedic. 
The whole article seems to be of little relevance to anyone but those contemplating taking the relevant topic, in any case. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:31, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that the article is on an advanced placement class, it seems hard to think of another college board that would administer it, especially with the AP sidebar. It appears that the introduction is consistent with those of other AP classes.Mpgviolist (talk) 19:50, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which College Board, and where? 
Talk:Máel Ruba

message: Merge St Maelrubha into this article --MacRusgail 17:46, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Definately. siarach 10:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure about this thing of using the archaic Irish spelling all the time, I mean we don't talk about 'Sainte Johnne Ogilvye' do we? --MacRusgail 16:59, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, all the scholars who prefer Old Gaelic names for Old Gaelic persons don't seem to believe in your parallel. Seriously though, one  of the advantages of it is that it avoids giving preference to modern Scottish or to modern Irish Gaelic forms. Calgacus (ΚΑΛΓΑΚΟΣ) 14:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It often seems that there is one rule for one thing, and another for a different one. Like folk who frown upon the use of "Bonnie Prince Charlie" for being a POV nickname, but don't realise that "Lenin" or "Charlemagne" are both nicknames themselves. --MacRusgail 20:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Andrew Samuels

message: The subject of this article does not appear to pass the professor test for notability. Of course that criterion is not established as a WP policy, and can be questioned. But without further elaboration on the accomplishments of Samuels, I doubt the article would survive the AfD process. Anyone care to add the needed information to the article? In the mean time, I'm removing the article from the educational psychologists category. Nesbit 17:53, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:ISBN/Archive 1

message: Jan 05- March 05 Archived now: <B>Fra</B>nkB 17:55, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In some cases that seems to work, in others not, possibly because the publisher has (rather naughtily) assigned that number to another book later on. Shantavira 13:15, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Archived note

message: It would be useful to have information on the best sources of ISBN information for new and used books, worldwide.
I find BookKoob (US and UK) to be very good, but it would be interesting to know who actually has the largest publicly searchable database of ISBNs on the net.
ISBN Database are working on getting a large public domain database from libraries, so far they have close to 1.9 million unique ISBNs. There is an XML based API for querying book data.
ABE titles So far as I know this only contains books *currently* listed on ABE.
--PeterR 08:15, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best ISBN sources? 

message: I've always been under the impression that, in order to calculate if an ISBN is right, you should multiply the ten digits (including the check digit) from ten through one...
Which, in the resolved formula, would be something like this:
10×0 + 9×3 + 8×0 + 7×6 + 6×4 + 5×0 + 4×6 + 3×1 + 2×5
=  0  +  6  +  0  +  24 +  20 +  0  +  42 +  8  +  45
= 130
= 13×11 + 2
Of course the check digit would also be 2, in this case in particular -- but try it with another ISBN...
----
Here's the calculation algorithm from ISBN.org, the official Bowker (US ISBN issuer) site about ISBNs: 
--PeterR 21:21, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISBN calculation 

message: The article doesn't make clear (if it is indeed the case) that different editions have different ISBN numbers, but that reprints retain the original. Can someone confirm, please? Andy Mabbett 18:47, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Different editions
Talk:Joel Fan

message: Where was he born?  Badagnani 17:57, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of birth?

message: Most of this article is very good, but I'm concerned about the "Awards and critical acclaim" section -- notably the list of quotes from reviews, which reads like a promotional flyer for a concert rather than an encyclopedia article.  If the article is going to give a collection of quotes from positive reviewers, then for balance's sake it should also include a collection of quotes from people who think he sucks. :) It would seem better to just state the awards that he's won, which is a reasonably neutral fact, and let it go at that. Kickaha Ota 16:31, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards and critical acclaim 

message: Does he live in New York City? Badagnani (talk) 20:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Residence 
Talk:Great Migrations (Greyhawk)

message: I'm familiar with the Schnai, Cruskii, & Fruztii, but what was the 4th clan mentioned in the entry? Not the Zeai--they moved to the Tusking Strand after the migrations & were part of the Cruskii, iirc.-Robbstrd 17:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Check out page 8 of the Guide, just opposite the timeline. "To the far north, four of the strongest and fiercest clans managed to retain large stretches of land as Suloise." This is either a well-entrenched Gygax mistake, or a hint that there is a "missing" Suel tribe that ended up in the northern Flanaess. It's not the Coltens, as they were Flan. Any idea which way to go on this? --Iquander 23:59, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting. Since the racial mixture of Stonehold is "FS," I wonder if EGG meant that to be the 4th clan? I don't have the Guide in front of me so I can't give a fully informed opinion, however. Where did clan #4 come from? Did they split off from the three "Houses of Pursuit"? Did they come after? Before? Perhaps the 4th clan formed sometime after the Ice, Snow, & Frost Clans arrived on the Thillronian--I like the idea of an entire clan made up of exiles, criminals, & other vagrants, initially forced to live in the lands of the Coltens, eventually growing strong enough to become a power in their own right. By the time of Vlek Col Vlekzed, this renegade Suel "clan" has been conquered and enslaved by the Coltens, making Vlek's takeover of the land all the easier, the renegade Suel clan seeing him as a liberator. However, such details being mere speculation & fancy, have no place in the article, but we could perhaps note in relevant articles that the origins of the 4th clan are currently uncertain.-Robbstrd 18:21, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Suel clans
Talk:Caesarion (Rome)

message: Cairo? Is it a joke?
The capital and the main city of Ptolemaic Egypt was Alexandria. Cairo was founded by Arab invaders in 7th century.
I just watched the episode and the quote is actually "I have him or I die."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.167.101 (talk) 17:45, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: plot summary

message: Anybody else think of that analogy? Civil war in Egypt/Iraq means that Rome/USA goes hungry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.38.227.206 (talk) 13:13, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grain = Oil
Talk:Tiger Rag

message: The song is listed as written by "La Rocca / Edwards / Ragas / Sbarbaro / Shields / Da Costa" -- is there any reason the attribution should be doubted? That would be Nick LaRocca, Eddie Edwards, Henry Ragas, Tony Sbarbaro, Larry Shields, and Harry Da Costa; the first five of those are the Original Dixieland Jazz Band, who created the song. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 18:02, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I expanded on this point some. -- Infrogmation 14:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Authorship

message: The LSU Band web site (http://www.bands.lsu.edu/lsu_cd/index.php) lists Fight for LSU as the offical fight song. Someone may wish to check this fact.
You're right, though the sentence is technically correct. I'll clarify the sentence.
--75.179.159.4 02:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Louisiana State University Fight Song

message: Besides the fact that this section REEKS of self-promotion, does it even belong in this article? Jklharris (talk) 00:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tiger Rag: The Bible of LSU Sports

message: I revised the wording of the phrase reading "but experts have proven that "Tiger Rag" was worked out by the Jack Carey Band".  Mark Sublette objected, saying "you are changing text in a DIRECT QUOTE from the source".  I have no objection to including a direct quotation IF it is clear that it is a direct quotation-- contained within quotation marks and the person who said the quote clearly identified in the text. Without that, the text gives the false impression that Wikipedia is saying that "experts have proven..." and that the matter is unambiguously resolved to universal satisfaction of all who have seriously looked into the matter. With all due respect, Sam Chartres is certainly an important writer on early jazz, but a review of publications will find other experts who disagree with Chartres on various points. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 04:43, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Experts have proven"

message: Ironic that the paragraph questioning authorship of the song was plagiarised here without attributing its author. GA-RT-22 (talk) 01:51, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Irony
Talk:William Edward Cousins

message: I removed content that was copied from this copyright-protected webpage: . --mtz206 (talk) 18:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:12th Man (Texas A&M)

message: It has been suggested that 12th Man (football) and this page be merged.  The tag wasn't on this page, so I added it. --Rayc 18:11, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: After a discussion at Talk:12th Man (football), the merge has now been made. --Swift 08:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Soham (Sanskrit)

message: This article needs:
*A more encyclopedic tone
*Proper formatting (remove use of all caps)
*Proper references (i.e. book references) and citations
—Hanuman Das 18:13, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Once and for all, to whoever is deleting my editing in this matter — the correct japa of hamsa (or so'ham) mantra is: "ham" with the inhalation and "sa" (or "so") with the exhalation.
You may check  the authorized and reliable work of Swami Muktananda, I Am That: The Science of Hamsa from the Vijnana Bhairava (Siddha Yoga Publications, 1992) and the Vijnana Bhairava itself, verse 24.
If you have a more reliable source for the reversal of syllables ("sa" or "so" with inbreath and "ham" with outbreath) please quote it.Orlando F (talk) 20:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Although the original "so" on inhalation and "ham" on exhalation that you have overwritten a number of times, was not supported by citations, it is verifiably inaccurate of you to claim - in all good faith, I think - that ham" with the inhalation and "sa" (or "so") with the exhalation is "the correct japa". I can understand, if you got frustrated over seeing your edit reversed to the original without citations of references, but using majuscules is not Good practise and adding finality ("once and for all") to your POV does not make it true. I will try to find time to add greater balance to the article. MarB4 (talk) 13:53, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ONCE AND FOR ALL: THE CORRECT JAPA TECHNIQUE

message:  is the same as the mantra hamsa Ham with the inhalation and sa with the exhalation. ("I Am That").
While the relation between soham and hamsa is relevant, the inclusion of a reference to a note on practice rather than a source is less obvious. I suggest the reference be removed and included with source citation under a separate appropriate heading. MarB4 (talk) 15:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 
Talk:Chairman of the Board (film)

message: Here's a better source for Norm MacDonald's roasts being viewed as some of the best moments on Late Night/Norm's Career (https://news.avclub.com/its-3-p-m-so-lets-re-live-the-3-funniest-words-of-nor-1828440918). I would cite it myself but I don't know how.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.124.84.111 (talk) 14:28, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Late Night Promotion

message: I defy anyone to explain the plot if there is such a thing as Glow in the Dark paint in the universe of 'Chairman of the Board'.  --Jperlin 22:50, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Devil in the Flesh (1998 film)

message: This isn't an erotic movie, doesn't contain any nude or sex scenes (but a couple references)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.48.105.202 (talk) 10:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: We have sources that call it an erotic thriller. You might want to read Erotic thriller.. It says "Most erotic thrillers contain scenes of softcore sex and nudity" "Most" is not "all". Meters (talk) 04:47, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: erotic movie??
Talk:Edge of Seventeen (film)

message: Is edge of seventeen really a comedy..?
:According to IMDb it is – (empoor) 18:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ef3R1dq4OME. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 02:37, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Per this edit I removed the odd placed section under the soundtrack including New Order's Age of Consent. It obviously doesn't belong, I'm pretty sure the title is just on a poster or something in one of the scenes. But if there is anything interesting to say about it, please do so here (it isn't in the credits and I'd be surprised if I missed it in the soundtrack somewhere. Possibly it could be heard briefly from a music player in the same scene.)--184.63.132.236 (talk) 23:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of Consent?
Talk:Frat House

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 
Talk:Stanton Drew stone circles

message: I've created a new template for megalithic sites, Template:Megalith, as used on Pikestones and Round Loaf.  Some instructions on the template talk page, to show how to use it.  Cheers! --PopUpPirate 13:29, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template:Megalith

message: Aren't Stanton and Drew the surnames of the children in the Dark Is Rising book series? Where does the name of the circles originate from? 82.6.97.239 (talk) 19:54, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Dark Is Rising

message: There is no mention anywhere on the page of what time period the stones actually date from. Are they 1000 years old? 2000? 3000? 4000? It gives little clue.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.114.157.100 (talk) 11:07, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody knows.— Rod talk 15:42, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

text: It is neolithic, that is other henges and ancient stone circles are. I think the 1997 survey also stated explicitly it was neolithic.Aarghdvaark (talk) 02:39, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  The English Heritage leaflet available at the site is less certain than that: "share an affinity with [sites like Avebury but] there is little material evidence to take this interpretation further." & "Stone circles such as those here are known to date broadly to the late Neolithic and early Bronze Age (approx 3000-2000BC)". A summary of this leaflet seems to be online here and here, but I suspect these are retyping of info from the leaflet. Shame Enlish Heritage have not put the whole text online. Rwendland (talk) 13:53, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The geophysics survey says "[The stone circles] proximity to each other, ... indicate that these sites are related as a single complex, and it is a fair assumption that Stanton Drew was once a place of primary significance during the later Stone Age". So I think we can quote it as neolithic (aka late stone age). Aarghdvaark (talk) 05:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: When were the stones originally erected?

message: Researcher Michael Bott has suggested that the banks surrounding the circle were created for an audience in order to watch hunting games within, with the multiple posts inside the circle serving as obstacles for the hunters and their prey - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulpQqzO2EFA  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hillbillyholiday81 (talk • contribs) 13:35, 10 March 2013
:Self published source and fringe theory at best - and the fact it comes from an actor hardly lends it credibility. Are there other more respected sources who believe this too? --Bob Re-born (talk) 14:15, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative theories

message: What else do people think is needed to get this article to meet the Good article criteria?— Rod talk 17:24, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What else is needed to get this article to GA quality? 

message: On 1776 William Stukeley was already more than 10 years dead (died 1765). אביהו (talk) 09:43, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "It was recorded by both John Aubrey in 1664 and William Stukeley in 1776."??
Talk:Harrow Weald

message: Last few paragraphs have a cleanup need. SP-KP 18:22, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Emerson Knives/version 1

message: Reorganizing and restructuring page for encyclopedic tone and clarity.--Mike Searson 01:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Based on discussion in a seperate article undergoing peer review for Good article Nomination I would like to archive this page and redirect inquiries to the Ernest Emerson article if there are no objections.
Key elements and sources from this article (aside from the table of knife models) have already been moved to the Ernest Emerson article. 
Mike Searson 23:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Archive
Talk:Smack

message: * Is there any proof that the Prodigy refer to sex in that song? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.111.28.246 (talk • contribs) 14:31, Jul 8, 2006 (UTC)
* I don't know, but I removed it for other reasons—it's not encyclopedic and doesn't belong on a disambiguation page, anyway. – Mipadi 13:50, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prodigy 

message: * Smack is an article about some software Smack (Linux security module) .
Smack should redirect to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.111.243.217 (talk)  08:37, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: The software