lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Brondesbury railway station

message: How is Brondesbury pronounced? I had assumed that it was pronounced as though the letter e was missing as Brondzbry and this is consistent with the naming of the Brondes Age bar, nearby, which is presumably pronounced Brondz Age (a play on "Bronze Age"). However, the Overground announcements stress the letter e, pronouncing the station name as Bronduzbry. What do the people who live there call it? 83.104.249.240 (talk) 12:04, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Beauty Channel

message: I'm not good at all this but you guys can add the television stations I recieved. I don't want to foul things up.
Austin, TX ~ Time Warner 281,
Bakersfield, CA ~ Time Warner 252,
Binghamton, NY ~ Time Warner 185,
DirecTV ~ National 223,
Dish Network ~ National 225,
Greensboro, NC ~ Time Warner 498,
Milwaukee, WI ~ Time Warner 194,
Minneapolis, MN1 ~ Time Warner 126,
Minneapolis, MN2 ~ Time Warner 876,
NE Ohio ~ Time Warner 289,
Portland, ME ~ Time Warner 676,
Rural Cable ~ Across the Country,
San Antonio, TX ~ Time Warner June,
South Carolina ~ Time Warner 1120,
Syracuse, NY~ Time Warner 185.
--216.81.119.208 19:15, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Bembine Tablet

message: Much of the original article seems to have been disgracefully plagiarised from suspect sources and put too much emphasis on the tablet's esoteric connections. I have checked the material and then rearranged and rewritten the sections to make the article more encyclopaedic. Mzilikazi1939 (talk) 13:24, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism 

message: Is there actually a translation of the tablet or was this supposed to just 'depict' a picture?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.75.93.51 (talk) 18:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual Translation
Talk:Camden Road railway station

message: The co-ordinates for this station seem wrong - they are some way north of the station 62.60.98.133 (talk) 15:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

message: The redirect Camden Road tube station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Pkbwcgs (talk) 02:31, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Camden Road tube station]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Robert Jermain Thomas

message: cuantos años duro en la obra de misionero 2800:150:13B:234D:1817:DCDC:FD95:BBF7 (talk) 01:29, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   Robert Jermain Thomas 

message: The current article states that Thomas took a job as an interpreter for the General Sherman crew. It then states that Thomas persuades the crew to sail to Pyongyang to establish trade, even though it was illegal. Then the article goes on to say that his personal intention was to spread the gospel. Up until 15th January 2012, the article simply states the differences in motivation for the crew and Rev Thomas for going to Korea, but in 16th January 2012, there was an edit so that the crew was persuaded by Thomas. There are no in article citations in the article, making it very difficult to find which piece of information comes from which source. Is it possible to find a clarification whether the crew had originally intended to go to Korea before meeting Thomas? Other articles about the SS General Sherman in general seem to suggest W.B. Preston the owner had wanted to open trade. IcesundaeUK (talk) 14:58, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thomas' intention to board the General Sherman
Talk:List of songs in Guitar Hero Encore: Rocks the 80s

message: I've redirected this article to a new article that people here wanted, List of songs in Guitar Hero games. Kaktibhar 20:20, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion closed. List of songs in Guitar Hero games was deleted. The result was to keep the song lists separate and delete List of songs in Guitar Hero games (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs in Guitar Hero games). Lightsup55 ( T | C ) 06:44, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected

message: Should the GH songlists be merged to a single article?  Please see discussion here. --MASEM 20:42, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been deleted, so this discussion is no longer necessary. --MASEM 19:35, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should song lists be merged to single article 
Talk:Gospel Oak railway station

message: Is a series of pictures of all platform edges really encyclopedic?--SilasW (talk) 22:12, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever the latest wording is, the meaning was that in that period there was no changing trains at Gospel Oak because the only passenger trains were those on the North London Line.--SilasW (talk) 14:09, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery 

message: WP articles contradict themselves as to whether the closure was in 1925 or 1926.--SilasW (talk) 14:13, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year closed 

message: The redirect Gospel Oak Underground station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Pkbwcgs (talk) 02:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Gospel Oak Underground station]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sunok

message: IMO, these kinds of statements made in the article are considered original research and POV. Also, I don't buy the excuse for the below-10 point rating. In Japan, the NHK morning dramas is aired the same time as Sunok. In that time slot, the morning dramas consistently beat out many of the prime-time dramas in the same week. So for someone to say that this drama has low ratings because of its time slot is totally absured. It could also be that there's just better shows on in the morning. There are many reasons - so don't go on interpreting these ratings in this manner. Groink (talk) 20:22, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What exactly is "poor ratings"???
Talk:Hayes & Harlington railway station

message: "… however, the main line to Reading will be electrified by 2016 as part of the project to modernise the Great Western Main Line."
Was it?  It is now 2017. --Redaktor (talk) 17:59, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No. There are masts almost all the way to , but wires only about as far as Maidenhead, and I don't think that they're energised even that far yet. Wires begin again near Pangbourne, and continue through Didcot until they stop around about milepost  (close to the western end of Didcot Power Station). The only wires that I've seen at Reading are in the new depot on the north side of the Bristol line, west of the station. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:45, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electrification 
Talk:Hackney Central railway station

message: The second para describes in the future tense what was expected to happen when TfL took over the running of the NLL.  In particular this fragment: "service frequencies are set to double to 8 trains per hour by 2010 with 24 new tube style trains by 2008. Station deep cleaning and renovations are due in spring 2008."
I don't currently have the time to research whether TfL met these targets -- if they did then it's a simple case of mungeing those sentences to be in the past tense rather than future. Otherwise they should be updated to reflect what actually did happen. Either way, once that's been done I'd have no problem with the Out-of-date tag being removed.
Lost tourist (Talk) 14:33, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of date
Talk:Kentish Town West railway station

message: Past figures in these article cannot be considered meaningful. They show what was counted in some way but they typically fluctuate wildly (as here) and the source, the ORR, proclaims that the counting methodology and effectiveness are in constant states of flux. Mostly they depend on some number of tickets which clearly with the ever-changing ways of paying fares in not a solid base. Since LO took over, with added staff, NLL trains when I travel are still crowded but not so badly as previously. Mr Freeman no longer finds the train cheaper than the bus to go from KTW to Hampstead Heath.--SilasW (talk) 21:13, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pax #s as doubtful as ever
Talk:Kingston railway station (England)

message: I've restored Kingston railway station as a redirect here simply because all of the links inbound appear to be for this article. Once those links are fixed it can redirect to the disambiguation page at Kingston station and this article will no longer require a hatnote. MRSC (talk) 10:47, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. Do you happen to know if that get done by a bot these days or is it still a manual job? -Arb. (talk) 12:59, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kingston railway station redirect

message: I have met several statements that vested interests opposed letting a railway into Kingston and so: 
* the South West Main Line ran south of Kingston with the first "Kingston station" on the Ewell Road then moved to the present site of Surbiton station (and so renamed when the line from Twickenham was built) and
* the line from Twickenham either actually ended at Hampton Wick and was carried over the Thames later, or the opposition was overruled and the line reached Kingston but too late to stop the building of Hampton Wick station.
This referencehttp://www.twickenham-museum.org.uk/detail.asp?ContentID=214would says the line temporarily ended at Hampton Wick. The L&SWR must have been intent on having a bridge to Kingston to have put Hampton Wick station on an embankment, there used to be several level crossings between Strawberry Hill and Hampton Wick.
Has anyone more substantial information about whether Hampton Wick was a temporary terminus??--SilasW (talk) 11:57, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposition to station
Talk:Mill Hill Broadway railway station

message: Did the 2015 service changes come into effect? Jackiespeel (talk) 10:25, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Service changes

message: According to the NR station map the photos are orientated incorrectly.--Dave F63 (talk) 21:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo Directions
Talk:North Woolwich railway station

message: Until Local government re-organisation under the London Government Act 1963; North Woolwich Station was in the area of The Metropolitan Borough of Woolwich, and the area of The London County Council. It was, therefore "in London". However, trains leaving North Woolwich (for Stratford) were regarded as "Up" trains, and trains to North Woolwich (from Stratford) were regarded as "down" trains. Is there any other places where the "Down" line led into "London"; and the "Up" line led away from "London".   
Stratford, (and the other stations on the line, Silvertown, Custom House, Canning Town, and West Ham) were in the County Borough of West Ham; and therefore technically "in Essex". 
All this was swept away on 1 April 1965, when The London Borough of Newham was created.    
86.176.212.247 (talk) 17:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: "Up" and "Down" don't mean towards or away from London, and have nothing to do with local authority boundaries. They normally indicate towards (up) or away from (down) the mileage zero of the line (there are exceptions, particularly in south Wales). In the case of the North Woolwich branch, the zero point is at Victoria Park Junction, east of  and a quarter of a mile west of . See this RCH Junction Diagram, upper left, where the purple line (Great Eastern Railway) branches off the dark blue line (North London Railway). So Up is towards Homerton; down is towards North Woolwich. --Redrose64 (talk) 18:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Up and Down line definitions 

message: Will note [The abandoned East London railway line set to be transformed into 348 new homes overlooking the Thames (msn.com)
Where should a link to the the Ian Visits page The disused North Woolwich railway station is up for sale (ianvisits.co.uk)be placed? Jackiespeel (talk) 17:56, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ian Visits is a blog, albeit somewhat credible, so ideally a better source should be found. 10mmsocket (talk) 18:01, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Put it in external links. Roger 8 Roger (talk) 20:08, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The only point I would make - the entry is from 2020, so there may be more recent information. Jackiespeel (talk) 11:20, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Developments
Talk:List of unsigned state highways in Mississippi

message: According to state law, MS 812 "Begins on U.S. 49W and extends north into Ruleville, Sunflower County." (This is locally-maintained Sunflower Street and does not appear to be signed as of 2013.) But (as of 2009) MS 812 is signed as a continuation of MS 315 into Paris. --NE2 06:30, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's up with MS 812? 

message: The simplest manner to complete the merger will be to simply note in  List of state highways in Mississippi which highway designations are unsigned and then redirect this article there. Imzadi 1979 →  12:30, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  To complete merger
Talk:Passing Strangers

message: Wasn't Passing Strangers also the title of a ballad recorded by Billy Eckstine and Sarah Vaughan? Paul20070 19:44, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was. It was released in 1957, although I don't know how well it did in the charts or whether it's that well remembered these days. I'm sure my parents had a copy of the song though. 217.43.196.160 10:29, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Franklin Adreon

message: The picture titled Franklin Adreon in this article is actually one of Yakima Canutt.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhstrickland (talk • contribs) 13:56, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: You took the words right out of my mouth. That's very definitely Canutt. Racing Forward (talk) 20:10, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Picture
Talk:South Hampstead railway station

message: This map http://www.victorianlondon.org/maps/railwaymap.htm shows "Loudoun Road station" at, or very near to, the present South Hampstead railway station. Are they the same and is that the reason for S Hamp's dates to be uncertain? Could Loudoun rd sta have been displaced/renamed when the Great Central Line was built to Marylebone?
--SilasW (talk) 15:56, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name and dates
Talk:South Tottenham railway station

message: I wonder why these are there? The Gospel Oak to Barking line is diesel-operated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.140.57.113 (talk) 13:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See the Lea Valley Lines article. There is a limited service from Liverpool Street to Enfield Town via Stratford, using a short section of the Gospel Oak to Barking line. Currently this service seems to comprise only one train per week on Saturday mornings, in one direction only: Liverpool St (05:28) - Stratford (05:37) - Seven Sisters (05:50), then all stations to Enfield Town (06:04). Between Stratford and Seven Sisters, the train passes non-stop through South Tottenham. Presumably there was once a more frequent service on this route, and the line is now maintained only as a Parliamentary service. Thunderfish (talk) 20:34, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: overhead cables

message: Does anyone know exactly when the platforms were rebuilt and the eastbound's length cut? As that's one of the main problems for increasing capacity on the Goblin it would be useful to know when this happened. Timrollpickering (talk) 15:14, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platform rebuilding
Talk:St. James Street railway station

message: It would be useful to know if or when Oyster is due at this station.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Newschapmj1 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

message: On what grounds was the page moved from  to ? --Redrose64 (talk) 17:26, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A full stop after St seems to be the sole reason.--Davidvaughanwells (talk) 20:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There isn't a full stop on the station nameboards, nor in the National Rail info page. Moreover, this full stop may be correct American English, but it's not correct British English: the convention is to put full stops on a contraction except where the contraction and the word contracted both end in the same letter. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:23, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know whether this is the work of our full stop happy friend but the first sentence is a bit nonsensical! - "St. James Street railway station formerly known as St James Street" Must get round to adding a bit of pre Wikipedia history to this page at some point. --Davidvaughanwells (talk) 18:13, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent move
Talk:Britwellian

message: I removed the 'cleanup' I think it looks ok now.Seth J. Frantzman 19:47, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Tooting railway station

message: Some clarification and context are needed for "use of the 'Junction' suffix continues to this day".--SilasW (talk) 14:27, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continued use of 'Junction' suffix 

message: Should the few daily Southern services to/from London Bridge be added to the top of the article? --Jamesedmo (talk) 13:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Services
Talk:Gurian Republic

message: From the lead: "Formed out of a revolt due to land grazing rights in 1902..."
I think this is a misuse of "due to". Surely they weren't revolting because they had rights? I also think "out of" should be reworded, perhaps simply to "during". 216.8.143.101 (talk) 15:35, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the comment. I changed it to "over land grazing rights", which I think is a more accurate description of what was going on. Kaiser matias (talk) 17:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Due to" 

message: User:Kaiser matias thank u for this articles expansion. But the name should be "REPUBLIC OF GURIA" instead of Gurian Republic. Can you move the name please? Its name is wrongly translated from Russian instead of Georgian name. 108.30.14.88 (talk) 16:30, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: We must abide by what sources use. Most English-language sources refer to it as the "Gurian Republic", so that is the title used here. Kaiser matias (talk) 19:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: that is very unfortunate. if so they translated from russian and is rather sad as it is incorrect name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.30.14.88 (talk) 16:58, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Kaiser matias]]
Talk:TN postcode area

message: Following an unexplained anonymous reversion, I have unreverted the article to my last edit because the local authority area column has been checked against official data released under OS OpenData under a CC-by 3.0 compatible licence by Ordnance Survey. I have added a ref to this in the first data row, and included a copyright notice in accordance with the licence.
See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Maps#OS OpenData for discussion about compatibility of OS OpenData with Wikipedia. In view of the novelty of explicitly including this data for textual (rather than graphical) content, and the apparent need to include a copyright statement, I invite comment.
— Richardguk (talk) 23:21, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  OS OpenData 

message: Surely TN is the Tunbridge Wells area as evidenced by the fact that TN1 is in Tunbridge Wells.
--81.130.195.101 (talk) 09:08, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queries
Talk:Joan Regan

message: The birth details may be sourced from a normally reliable publication, but the official birth index has her surname spelled Bethell, not Bethel, as does the entry in the marriage index. Second, there is no entry in the birth index for a Siobhan Bethel. I suppose family may have called her that, but such a name was clearly not registered. Her middle initial is given as E. --Pfold (talk) 15:46, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Rozoil

message: If one of the purposes of an encyclopedia is to spread information and knowledge to places that this information and knowledge would be otherwise unknown, than there is no practical reason that this entry be deleted. Those who are not familiar with the Heating Oil Industry in New Haven CT, will have no clue who Rozoil is and why the company is important to note, both in a historical context of heating oil and the New Haven heating oil market, and also in a business perspective. Being that Rozoil is a progressive company many other companies have recently been changed or formed to follow a similar business model.
	Those who have elected to have this entry be deleted simply do not see why this article and the topics discussed in it are relevant. If anything as it's creator I would say that this article should be given time so that it can be edited to provide more sources and or clean up to substantiate the points and information that make it worthy to be read. In short the COD type of heating oil companies were started during the 1980's in New Haven, CT and have since spread throughout the Northeast. Unfortunately there is not substantial data on the internet that is readily available that can back this. But I do know that Bigger Automatic companies have tried for decades to squash the COD business and this could be a real reason as to why we don’t hear that much about it. 
	Whatever the reason may be, Rozoil is the Biggest COD company in the region, and because of this it is worthy of recognition. I do not think that this article is offering spam, and the reality is Rozoil is heavily searched word on the internet in New Haven. The more information that readers have about the oil industry, and the players involved in local, regional and global dealings with this subject, the better. 
	I would not flag for deletion an article about the Hassane Tribe in the Western Sahara as a possible plug to initiate a tribal war, but would read it with interest. So the same if somebody is interested in the heating oil industry of new haven, or COD oil companies than they will have an article to read in Rozoil.
	So to close, this article should remain on Wikipedia, time should be given that better sources used as references, and the News articles that have made recent headlines about the company should prove it is worthy of attention and capable of providing a source of knowledge and information. Negevboy 19:53, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ROZOIL
Talk:Upper Holloway railway station

message: Much material in this article is relevant to the whole Barking <-> Gospel Oak railway line and as such would be better off in the article about the latter, if it is not already there.
This will save a lot of updating of the article wrt the line - something editors are going to be busy with as the line re-opened on 27 Feb 2017 and gets new electric trains in 2018.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.232.34.78 (talk) 19:06, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barking & Gospel Oak Line
Talk:Walthamstow Queen's Road railway station

message: The article has the usual box giving stations on either side on its line and then a box giving the same names for the same length of track when that was part of a former railway company. Is that really helpful? In any case
* A) those given as responsible, LO and XYZ Ry Co, are not in the same category, one is a track-owner, the other a pax train provider (the line carries freight too) and 
* B) here (and in many other cases) "Disused" is simply not true; "We all no what it really means" is just not good enough for an encyclopedia.--SilasW (talk) 08:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disused Railways
Talk:Welling railway station

message: A discussion which may affect this page has been opened at Talk:Welling Station#Requested move. 117Avenue (talk) 07:43, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welling Station 