Talk:Law of Singapore

message: I think that 'Law Enforcement in Singapore' should be merged with 'Singapore Police Force' as it doesn't really add anything more to the latter article. Jacklee 14:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That does appear so in its present state. There is actually much scope for expansion, since the SPF isnt the only law-enforcing agency in Singapore.--Huaiwei 14:37, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, perhaps there are two ways to go about it. One is to have an article called 'Law Enforcement in Singapore' and talk about the Singapore Police Force and other law-enforcement agencies (eg, the Central Narcotics Bureau and Singapore Customs) in it. The other way is to do away with a general article on law enforcement and just have separate articles on the various law enforcement agencies, or reduce the law enforcement article to a page containing links to the other articles. I think the latter option may be preferable. Jacklee 00:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Oppose they are different concepts, so even if they happen to be presented as the same concepts, we should remedy that instead of concur and effect any conflation. Chensiyuan 12:27, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I'm not clear what you mean. Are you suggesting that 'Law Enforcement in Singapore' should be left as a distinct article and beefed up with more information (ie, the first option I suggested)? Jacklee 21:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: yes Chensiyuan 09:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging 'Law of Singapore' and 'Law Enforcement in Singapore' 

message: Should there be a section on the place of Sharia courts in Singapore? -- Paul 22:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Syariah law -- that is, the family and succession law aspects of it -- does form part of the law in Singapore under the Administration of Muslim Law Act. However, I'm wondering if it is better to have a separate article on that, and perhaps just a brief mention in 'Law of Singapore' and a link to that article. Jacklee 21:37, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sharia law 

message: The image :Image:Mmsia1.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: — Cheers, JackLee –talk–</span> 13:57, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Mmsia1.jpg

message: Hi, Jpatokal. The information you recently added to the article doesn't fit in the "Sources of Singapore law" section. Even if, as the US Department of State claims, the President and Minister for Home Affairs wield judicial power, this does not make them a "source of law". Furthermore, the information is POV – some information refuting the State Department's stand needs to be added, for balance. If you want to discuss that topic in the article there needs to be a separate section dealing with the issue. I have temporarily moved the information over to the article "Judicial system of Singapore" (which is itself in need of massive overhaul). — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 04:37, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judicial independence 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 29 September 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:22, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Singapore Parliament House.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 12 external links on Law of Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.minlaw.gov.sg/cmc/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061224123000/http://www.ipto.gov.sg/ to http://www.ipto.gov.sg/
*Added  tag to http://www.minlaw.gov.sg/lab/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071009210530/http://www.minlaw.gov.sg/ab/ to http://www.minlaw.gov.sg/ab/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061010180743/http://www.ipos.gov.sg/main/aboutip/copyright/copyrighttribunal.html to http://www.ipos.gov.sg/main/aboutip/copyright/copyrighttribunal.html
*Added  tag to http://www.minlaw.gov.sg/lab/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070110025503/http://www.subcourts.gov.sg/ to http://www.subcourts.gov.sg/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070205133502/http://www.familycourtofsingapore.gov.sg/ to http://www.familycourtofsingapore.gov.sg/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070422205130/http://www.juvenilecourtofsingapore.gov.sg/ to http://www.juvenilecourtofsingapore.gov.sg/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061022214622/http://www.smallclaims.gov.sg/ to http://www.smallclaims.gov.sg/
*Added  tag to http://www.minlaw.gov.sg/cmc/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061107141307/http://www.lawsociety.org.sg/ble/ to http://www.lawsociety.org.sg/ble/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061009010547/http://www.nbs.ntu.edu.sg/Faculty/BL/BL.asp to http://www.nbs.ntu.edu.sg/Faculty/BL/BL.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061028225317/http://bschool.nus.edu.sg/Departments/BussPolicy/home.htm to http://bschool.nus.edu.sg/Departments/BussPolicy/home.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061031071530/http://www-bus.tp.edu.sg/ to http://www-bus.tp.edu.sg/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070329063942/http://www-bus.tp.edu.sg/bus_home/bus_courses/bus_ft_courses/bus_diploma_in_law.htm to http://www-bus.tp.edu.sg/bus_home/bus_courses/bus_ft_courses/bus_diploma_in_law.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Law of Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061205225007/http://egazette.com.sg/current.php to http://www.egazette.com.sg/current.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified