lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Robert Wood Johnson I

message: *Robert Johnson → Robert Johnson (musician) —(Discuss) Since there are so many Robert Johnsons no one person should be located at the Robert Johnson Page.  This would make way to move Robert Johnson (disambiguation) to Robert Johnson.  TonyTheTiger 21:40, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move Debate

message: Much of this history portion of this article does not meet quality standards. Much of it lacks citation and is written in a biased tone. BHolmes555 (talk) 14:09, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone of article
Talk:Robert Johnson (martyr)

message: *Robert Johnson → Robert Johnson (musician) —(Discuss) Since there are so many Robert Johnsons no one person should be located at the Robert Johnson Page.  This would make way to move Robert Johnson (disambiguation) to Robert Johnson.  TonyTheTiger 21:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Move Debate

message: There are three not four parishes listed here which he may have originated from: Should they not read "Claverly, HALESOWEN, and Worfield"?  Halesowen, now in Worcestershire, was an exclave of the county of Shropshire in his lifetime.
Cloptonson (talk) 21:23, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested native parishes
Talk:Robert Johnson (English composer)

message: *Robert Johnson → Robert Johnson (musician) —(Discuss) Since there are so many Robert Johnsons no one person should be located at the Robert Johnson Page.  This would make way to move Robert Johnson (disambiguation) to Robert Johnson.  TonyTheTiger 21:43, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Move Debate

message: This round appears in Ravenscroft's Melismata, where's the evidence that Robert Johnson is the author? Greg 04:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: He that will an alehouse keep
Talk:Rover Group

message: I have changed this from a disambig page to a short history of Rover Group as I believe it warrants a better page Penrithguy 21:45, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Area codes 905, 289, 365, and 742

message: CNAC now lists the triple overlay at http://www.cnac.ca/images/AreaCodeMap_highres.png.  As a result, I've renamed the page back to Area codes 905, 289 and 365.  If CNAC is officially now acknowledging the triple overlay exists, it's only fair to ensure the article's title also reflects it, even if the area code is not yet active.
Snickerdo (talk) 00:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The title of this article has been changed prematurely. Area code 365 is not in use yet, and will not be in use for another 2 years. The title should be reverted back to show the actual area codes, with the 365 mentioned in the article, which is the norm with the other area code articles. UrbanNerd (talk) 06:52, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area Code 905, 289 and 365. 

message: Per https://cnac.ca/co_codes/co_code_lookup.htm, area code 742 is overlaid with 905, 289, and 365. It is called out in the opening paragraph and should be reflected in the title as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TDLMTH (talk • contribs) 14:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of area code 742 to title
Talk:Carson bandwidth rule

message: is this actually true?
Yes. Added reference to Couch and removed dispute indicator. Isotropic 00:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A square wave is nothing but a series of sine waves, Carson's rule applies here too once you decide what the highest modulating sine wave is (i.e. the rise and fall time of your square wave). Added a note about this to make it seem a little less magical. Altaphon (talk) 03:21, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

text: I concur with this concern.  I have read the paper cited and it does not contain "Carson's Rule."  It would be interesting to identify the original source of "Carson's Rule."  (I don't know what that original source is.  I came to the Wikipedia in the hope of identifying it.) Doug iowa (talk) 20:22, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

message: The last paragraph claims that any modulation will have infinite sidebands. I'm fairly sure that it should read "angle modulation." AM, for one, does not have infinite sidebands. (Unless the intelligence does, such as a squarewave.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.31.157 (talk) 17:27, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last paragraph
Talk:Hironori Ōtsuka

message: That Ohtsuka was some kind of head of Shindo Yoshin Ryu, so that this particular style developed into Wado Ryu, is a common myth among Wado Ryu people. Ohtsuka was one of several people who had a menkyo kaiden in the style. I change this although I have no source, other than Wado Ryu people who I trust on these matters. The other statement was unsourced also, and that version is the bigger claim. // habj 21:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Style
Talk:Brick and mortar business

message: The proper phrase for what is described here is "brick and mortar", not "bricks and mortar". There is a subtle difference, but when contrasting eCommerce from traditional commerce, the former is more generally used.
Brick And Mortar
A traditional "street-side" business that deals with its customers face to face in an office or store that the business owns or rents. Web-based businesses usually have lower costs and greater flexibility than brick-and-mortar operations. 
... The local grocery store and the corner bank are examples of "brick and mortar" companies. brick and mortar. Dictionary.com. Investopedia.com, Investopedia Inc.. brick and mortar (accessed: November 24 2006).
bricks and mortar
Basic and essential, as in Matthew Arnold's essay (1865): "Margate, that bricks-and-mortar image of British Protestantism." This phrase transfers essential building materials to other fundamental matters. It also may be used more literally to denote a building or buildings (whether or not made of bricks and mortar), as in The alumni prefer to see their donations in the form of bricks and mortar. [Mid-1800s] bricks and mortar. Dictionary.com. The American Heritage® Dictionary of Idioms by Christine Ammer, Houghton Mifflin Company. bricks and mortar (accessed: November 24 2006). 
*Support - An article should be as properly titled as possible when this does not cause any other conflicts. TonyTheTiger 19:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology (move page) 

message: I have moved the page, per the above discussion. -GTBacchus(talk) 06:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved

message: I've heard "bricks and mortar business" (note the plural) used here in the UK; a quick Google-check shows that while that specific phrase is not terribly common in the .uk space, the more common UK form for the base phrase is "bricks and mortar" (by a factor of about seven to two).  A decent web reference for this usage as opposed to the singular is ; the on-line OED lists the plural as well.  Just to explain why I included both the singular and plural forms for the UK.  Wooster (talk) 19:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: UK reference

message: The term "brick and mortar" is quite useful, and does not need "business" to be tagged on to the end. It can refer to any entity which has a physical location. Or, for my selfish purposes, can be used in context to refer to an entity which does not occupy a physical address, such as a group, large organization, or club. I just learned wiki speak today, or else I would have moved it. Thanks! SingDeep 09:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Hence moved because it's rather obvious. Lots of things can be described with the generic brick and mortar (brit. "Bricks and mortar"), and thus business usage can then appear sectioned on that page. --Jimthing (talk) 02:09, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove business from the title
Talk:Yangbajain

message: Why does this getting moved to Yangbajing? There's no explanation in the edit summary.—Nat Krause(Talk!·What have I done?) 17:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea. The official spelling is Yangbajain (see 《西藏地名》，中国藏学出版社 1995 and 《中国地名录》，中国地图出版社 1997), and I'm going to move the article accordingly. —Babelfisch 01:42, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: check coordinates of Yangbajing International Cosmic-Ray Observatory - some sources say 30.11'N　90.53' E　hight 4,300m... it should anyway be a separate article... --katpatuka (talk) 09:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  coordinates of observatory 

message: The article mentions 30 degrees C - 86 degrees F, which is above the boiling point at that altitude. (4300 m AMSL). If water was above the boiling point at that altitude, water from the human body will be boiling, and you will die! As you may read on the page Boiling point, water boils at about 70°C at 9000 m AMSL. So, at 4300 m, water boiling point is between 70 and 100°C, not around 30°C. It means one of the two assertions (temperature or above the boiling point at that altitude) is incorrect...
.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.89.14.185 (talk) 23:22, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water temperature 
Talk:Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007

message: Microsoft is clearly taking a different direction from portal, hence dropping the name sharepoint portal. What they are creating is a stack for knowledge workers and a set of applications upon that stack.
Well, nobody has disagreed with you here.  I'm going to remove the dispute tag. DouglasHeld 11:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I hit this page looking for a concise, clear, non-marketroid description of this product.  I'm disappointed with the results.  Is there a tagging mode for "rewrite in non-marketese" for Wikipedia?  This article desperately needs same. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 158.140.1.25 (talk) 21:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite in non-marketese? 

message: There is confusion about what features are part of Windows SharePoint Services (WSS) and what comes with the purchase of additional Microsoft Office SharePoint Server (MOSS) licenses. The WSS is freely available to download and install on Windows 2003. MOSS is a product that must be purchased. Notably, RSS and Wiki are in the WSS. This Microsoft link has the differences. See also this FTP article. I will work to try and re-arrange as best I can. Group29 15:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: MOSS 2K7 includes a superset of features of SPS. As such they are not mutually exclusive. Since they are independent offerings, IMO both articles should list their features. Maybe a section highlighting the differences would be good. --soum talk 15:38, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Misleading tag (June 2007)

message: Is it true that the product will be released with four different available versions, or possibly more?  If so can someone please write the versions that are available and a breif description of the role each is meant to fill?
: I believe this still needs to be done. SarcasticDwarf 14:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MOSS Versions 

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 15:55, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Chris Lucketti

message: His surname is Italian Whelanmk (talk) 17:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancestral country?
Talk:Traveler (mascot)

message: The paragraph on Riders needs a correction: According to an article that appeared in the OC Register: https://www.ocregister.com/2005/12/30/after-decades-trojan-warrior-set-for-last-ride/ Chuck O'Donell who is listed in the paragraph as a current Traveler rider has had his last ride during the Rose Bowl game of 2006. Also the article states that he never attended a class at USC, so he was not an USC alumni as stated in the current Wikipedia article.  There was no citation for the sentence that stated that all the successor riders (after the first rider Richard Saukko) are USC alumni.
Samsonthesailorman (talk) 03:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: The redirect Traveler (mascot has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 22:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Traveler (mascot]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Olivier Maingain

message: This article is written from a Flemish nationalist point of view, and should be considerably amended.Giordaano (talk) 20:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article with Flemish point of view 

message: I removed the whole paragraph after checking the original articles, e.g. the Belga dispatch: the sentence is "Bourgmestre de Woluwe Saint-Lambert, Olivier Maingain reçoit la cote de 7,5/10 de la part de l'opposition au Conseil communal composée notamment d'élus CD&V et Vld.". Actually, the 2006 officiel electoral results don't show any CD&V or VLD councillors, they were elected on local bilingual lists composed of several political parties. There was a councillor, Xavier Lienard, formerly of CD&V, who later (2012-) became an alderman under Maingain, plus two "true" CD&V councillors, Georges De Smul and Lieve Lippens, as well as one VLD, Stefan Ector, elected on the opposition coalition ("Cap Woluwe"). It makes 4 Flemish councillors out of 17 opposition councillors in a council of 35... What a "poll", indeed ! Minorities observer (talk) 11:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009 poll of "the best mayor"
Talk:Slaughter of the Knezes

message: I think slaughter is better choice than massacre, because they were beheaded. "Knights" is also inaccurate. "Knez" means nobleman in this case and not armoured knight. My version is "Slaughter of Serbian noblemen". And when happened this event? Bendeguz 22:31, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad title 

message: Were any noblewomen killed or were all the victims male?--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 09:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Were all the victims male?
Talk:Green laver

message: Aonori is very fragrant, like an herb. It is best described as "sea parsley"
I would have edited the main page myself, but I'm not entirely sure where to incorporate this information and I'm not at all familiar with the rules for making changes to Wikipedia pages. (Usually when I try to add an entry or change a page, I violate some kind of rule and the change/addition gets deleted right away.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.192.84.229 (talk • contribs)  10:32, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition

message: Other types of seaweed/green algae are called green laver. See Laver (seaweed). DCDuring (talk) 18:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[green laver]]
Talk:Disappearance of Ron Arad

message: The article title and disambiguation page say he was a pilot, but he was a navigator/WSO. -Father Inire 03:01, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect designation

message: Article says he is a "Lieutenant Colonel", but somehow, that seems a bit out of place for WSO on a F-4. Any ideas or and sources on that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.154.204.152 (talk) 18:25, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rank? 

message: The date and even the fact isn't confirmed, just presumed and unverified.  I'd change it myself but I don't really know how the persondata templates are used so I'm not sure if you can put non-standard data (like "presumed to have died in 1988") in them. 110.175.198.4 (talk) 02:23, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death 

message: Might have executed while captured 188.64.207.78 (talk) 05:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ron arad
Talk:Leader of the Opposition in the Senate (Canada)

message: Please get rid of all reference to leader of the opposition in the House of Commons (House leader). The position names may sound similar but, incorporating both into the same sentence only confuses people without giving added value.  In fact the formal title of House Leader used is incorrect as it should be: Leader of H.M.'s Loyal Opposition in the House of Commons.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.59.86.61 (talk) 17:50, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that the two names are similar must be dealt with. Also, you are wrong about the formal title of the Opposition House Leader; "Her Majesty's" is frequently left out. -Rrius (talk) 21:22, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing wording
Talk:Official Opposition (Canada)

message: How about having a list  of current (official)  Opposition leaders in the provinces as the Australian article has a list of current  Opposition leaders in its states and territories.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opposition_(Australia)
110.33.0.155 (talk) 06:21, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Provincial opposition leaders 

message: The first line of the article currently begins with "His Majesty's Loyal Opposition".  However, that is not the name of the article.  Nor is the term "His Majesty's Loyal Opposition" used anywhere in the Standing Orders of the House of Commons, nor the Parliament of Canada Act.  The term used is "Official Opposition" in the Standing Orders, while the Parliament of Canada Act refers to the Leader of the Opposition. The citation given in support of the term is a booklet put out by Citizenship Canada to help explain the government of Canada to newcomers.  That booklet cannot take priority over the term used in the Standing Orders of the House of Commons. Given the lack of any reliable source from the House of Commons or the Government of Canada that the formal name is Loyal Opposition, that term should not be used in the opening line.  The significance of the term is covered in the "Name" section of the article.  Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 18:26, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Opposition v His Majesty's Opposition
Talk:Gerald M. Boyd

message: Thanks to Jokestress and others for their work on this article. Capitalistroadster 09:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks
Talk:Buck Rogers: A Life in the Future

message: Original research is just that - synthesis of facts by way of comparing with other facts. Stating a plot element in a book falls under the category of "synopsis" and should not be labeled as OR. 205.206.130.93 (talk) 02:47, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Misunderstanding of "original research"
Talk:Barra da Lagoa

message: *Source for original article-I stayed there for a month.
:Hope you take no offence, but I laughed a lot when I read your comment.  Please, take a look at WP:V. Victor Lopes (talk) 00:04, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

message: This article needs some serious re-work. I'd do it, if I was familiar with the subject. Someone who is could spend some minutes on this page to improve its quality. As long as it doesn't look like the travel guide it was before, it's enough. Victor Lopes (talk) 00:04, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of the article
Talk:Minister of Foreign Affairs (Canada)

message: Should this page not be merged with the entry for Secretary of State for External Affairs? It's the same ministry, just a different name.[]? Malachi is survivin (talk) 04:54, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this suggestion. I added merge tags to both articles. I'll monitor this discussion for a month. If no objections I will perform the merge. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 17:14, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry

message: It looks like this government post was made from the merger of three others. Is it now the same as, or a replacement for, Minister of Science (Canada)? --BurritoBazooka (talk) 15:32, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, nope, looks like the posts are separate still. The subject of the article is akin to what is called "Minister of Industry" in some other countries. --BurritoBazooka (talk) 14:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same as [[Minister of Science (Canada)]]? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. There's a clear consensus to not move this. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:19, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry →  – Per MOS's guidance on capitalizing generic job titles (don't). Primergrey (talk) 22:46, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we wouldn't normally put an article in a title. For my part, I think this is what SMcCandlish is trying to say when he attempts to parse the recently-made-into-a dog's breakfast that is the MOS:JOBTITLES section. Primergrey (talk) 02:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 March 2024
Talk:Minister of International Trade Diversification

message: Merge Minister of Small Business, Export Promotion and International Trade into this article. In the new Canadian cabinet, the successor to the Minister of International Trade Diversification is a new post filled by Mary Ng: the Minister of Small Business, Export Promotion and International Trade. Although the new title includes Min. Ng's title from before the election (when she was Minister of Small Business and Export Promotion, a minister responsible for ISED), she is clearly now the successor to the Minister of International Trade Diversification, one of the ministers responsible for Global Affairs - see: https://www.international.gc.ca/gac-amc/minister-ministre/index.aspx?lang=eng#a1
--Jonnyruutu (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose as "Small business" is not a real portfolio and only exists because of government pandering. When International trade will be given back its own minister and small business will be merged to whatever other department a subsequent government will shove the word "small business" in its minister's title, we'll be happy to have kept this article unmerged. Mottezen (talk) 03:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger discussion
Talk:Minister of state (Canada)

message: The proper title capitalizes "state" as per the Parliament of Canada which states "The title Minister of State was created under the Ministries and Ministers of State Act"  Jonathan Logan (talk) 12:15, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: Article was created originally as "minister of state (Canada)" and has been moved to Minister of State (Canada) as proposed. 199.125.109.107 (talk) 06:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move
Talk:Secretary of state (Canada)

message: It looks like all the Secretary of State positions disappeared after the October 2008 election?  The Secretaries of State listed at the bottom of this article have all moved to new positions, and I can't find any info on PARLINFO on whether anyone has replaced them. Dracunculus (talk) 23:31, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No more Secretaries of State?