lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sanyika Shakur

message: Does anybody know when Monster got out on his previous sentence?  I was just wondering how much time he had free until he ended up back "inside".  Also, does anybody know what his projected release date is?  Or which prison he is currently in?  Thanks in advance to anybody that knows.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.129.156.83 (talk) 15:12, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: When did Monster get out? (pre-2007)

message: The article currently (September 7, 2012) has a mysterious item on the right hand sidebar describing "Monster Kody's" status as "paroled Black August 2012".
What does this mean? What is "Black August"? Kody Scott aka Sanyika Shakur is not elegible for parole until 2014. 
Somebody in the know please correct and/or remove this ambiguous absurdity.
CannotFindAName (talk) 22:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paroled August 2012? 

message: There's whole paragraphs with no citations at all. I've added a tag to the article. A lot of it is probably accurate, but without citation should not appear in the article79616gr (talk) 17:09, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs needed 

message: I was looking at the picture of Monster Kody and I have to say you really couldn't have found a worse picture of him to display for the world to see and remember.  It seems you have put this picture up.to display his use of drugs and wanting people to remember the negative trats of Kody Scott rather than his many positive experiences throughout his life. I ask that you please change Kody Scotts picture and find one of many pictures thst people can look at and remember the many things that made Kody Scott a survivor of the many tests and stuggles that was Kody Scotts l ife! May Kody Scott REST IN PIECE . 2405:6E00:2290:22FE:7E56:65EB:536A:6DEC (talk) 07:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monster Kody photo
Talk:Templemore, Clonmore and Killea

message: I propose that Church of the Sacred Heart, Templemore be merged into Templemore, Clonmore and Killea. I think that the content in the Church of the Sacred Heart, Templemore article can easily be explained in the context of Templemore, Clonmore and Killea, and the Templemore, Clonmore and Killea article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Church of the Sacred Heart, Templemore will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:13, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: * Merge - makes sense and would be a richer article GeneralBelly (talk) 13:52, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:NK2 homeobox 1

message: Can somebody detail the distinction between the two? HGNC is pretty unclear about that, as it gives 'TTF1' both as an alias to 'NKX2-1' and as meaning 'transcription termination factor, RNA polymerase I' (http://www.genenames.org/cgi-bin/hgnc_search.pl?field=symb_prev_and_alias&andnot=AND&search_type=simple&anchor=equals&sortby=symbol&match=TTF1). Palpalpalpal (talk) 09:31, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Transcription termination factor" vs. "thyroid transcription factor"
Talk:Homeobox protein Nkx-2.5

message: I propose that the new article Nkx2-5 gene (April 2015) be merged into this article Homeobox protein Nkx-2.5. The article Homeobox protein Nkx-2.5 is currently a redirect from NKX2-5 (gene). The source article of the merge contains additional information and references, but based on the technical nature, the need for context to fully understand it, and the overlap with this article, I believe a merge is better than both a standalone article and a deletion/redirect. ← scribbleink talk 16:35, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal Suggestion
Talk:The 4 of Us

message: Don't see any sourcing on this, but this music strikes me as yet another band killed by nirvana (not killed literally, but tossed off their major label contract after album #2).  Songs like "she hits me" could not be released after 1993 from what I have seen.--Milowent • talkblp-r 12:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another nirvana casualty? 
Talk:The Impartial Reporter

message: There is also a similar article called "Impartial Reporter". 217.41.240.15 (talk) 12:33, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have merged the two. --omnipotence407 (talk) 16:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Identification of similar article

message: To whom was it sold? --omnipotence407 (talk) 16:36, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've now answered that in the article.  • Astynax talk 22:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Max Launch Abort System

message: MLAS... just a copy of the "underside-LAS" proposed (SEVEN months before) in my April 5, 2007 article:
http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/020newLAS.html
they say that have "invented" it in 2006 but there is NOT a PUBLIC (news, etc.) evidence of that... :)
. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.10.104.133 (talk) 13:57, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is that the wrong picture?  I looks wrong considering the text and the test launch photo show here:
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1406.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Overcast75 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely wrong. And removed. -Rigel1 (talk) 00:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong picture
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Supercheats

message: well now i have looked over the page agen. and since our webmaster has edited . it to be more notable . and the for and against deletion votes . i thank those that have said keep. and i will relay this to my felow members 
but remember i do not speak for the webmaster of the site . i am just an individual member of staff from said site
he may and probaly will continue to edit said page 
and add his own coment s hear 
 
Thanks for re vuing this site's artical
Neptis (talk) 20:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Dickensian Aspect

message: ...anybody?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.47.50 (talk) 22:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Looking at Brookes' imdb picture. Though he's wearing make-up, I think his distinctive nose and chin prove that he played Larry the poor soul McNulty took to the shelter. MrBlondNYC (talk) 03:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: William Joseph Brookes
Talk:Took (The Wire)

message: According to imdb, National Public Radio  and USA Today  Belzer was playing John Munch, but HBO only credits him as a "bar patron". Could this be listed in uncredited appearances or would that be speculation?JeffStickney (talk) 19:19, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: HBO didn't credit him as anything. The show does not list character names in the closing credits. Opark probably listed him as "bar patron" because we can't say for sure that he's supposed to be Munch. How about a "production" section where the Belzer cameo is noted with the NPR and USA Today refs? "I used to run bar." is an obvious reference to Munch as he owned a bar on Homicide. But until he or David Simon confirm that it is Munch, we can't definitely say. MrBlondNYC (talk) 05:32, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

text: Simon comfirms it was Munch in this interview:  MrBlondNYC (talk) 01:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belzer's cameo- 3 sources say he was playing John Munch 

message: How come the plot synopsis is so different in tone to all the previous entries for Wire episodes?  Needs a major rewrite...80.229.225.16 (talk) 15:03, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Synopsis

message: Hey yo, the Goodnight Everybody scene with Kima Greggs is not a reference to the book "Goodnight Moon".  Its a reference to Clockers another work by Richard Price.  Richard Prices confirms the allusion in ["an interview"] with "Fresh Air" host Terry Gross 
origen01 17:32, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goodnight Moon
Talk:WAGP

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a pipeline from the gas reserves in Nigeria to Benin, Togo and Ghana is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the West African Gas Pipeline. - Dravecky (talk) 07:24, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Gothic declension

message: To fix:
* describe numeri (a few pronouns have dualis),
* describe cases usages,
* add adjective declension, weak and strong,
* add pronouns and articles,
* add number forms declension,
* add lotsa samples and pecyooliar cases,
* add instrumental case samples,
Said: Rursus ☻ 14:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Genesis of article

message: Former order was Nom - Gen - Dat - Acc - Voc.  This order follows American (but not British!) usage in Latin.  However, it makes little sense for Germanic languages, where the Nom and Acc are so often the same, a fact that is obscured by separating them.  Furthermore, both Wright's "Grammar of the Gothic Language" and Bennett's "An Introduction to the Gothic Language" use the order Nom - (Voc -) Acc - Gen - Dat, and so I rearranged things to follow this order. Benwing (talk) 06:32, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of cases 

message: You state that The an, on and in declensions constitute a Germanic word derivation, which is also used for adjectives in the weak form marking definiteness. The declensions are unique for Germanic languages, and so have no counterparts in Latin or Greek.
I am not an expert but I think that there is a relation between the weak declensions and certain Latin declensions.
For example, guma, gumins should be related to Latin homo, hominis. (As far as I know these particular words are also etymologically connected.)
The corresponding Greek declension could be in -ōn, -onos (e.g. σώφρων, σώφρονος), but I am less sure here.
The type tuggō, tuggōns (with a long o) could be compared with Latin natiō, natiōnis, or with latrō, latrōnis.
The type wato, watins could have some relation to Latin declension type femur / feminis (roots that alternate r/n in the stem). Gothic does
not show this -r in the nominative (wato) but other Germanic languages have an -r (e.g. water, Wasser).
So each Germanic language has simplified the declension of this class of words by generalizing either -r (English) or -n (Gothic).
I think it is worth checking out if these relations between the declensions hold.
Giorb (talk) 00:52, 24 June 2010 (CET)
:You're quite right, the weak declension of nouns is not unique to Germanic and is indeed cognate to the n-stems of languages like Latin, Greek, Sanskrit, etc. What is unique to Germanic is having both a strong declension (originally the o-/eh2-stem declension) and a weak declension (originally the n-stem declension) for all adjectives, but that isn't what the article says. +Angr 18:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation of weak declension to Latin declensions 

message: What is the paradigm of the -uh declension (cf. 𐌸𐌹𐌿𐌷)? 2.9.125.57 (talk) 06:01, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The -uh declension
Talk:Origins of Indian ethnic groups

message: this whole article is false. it is based on afrocentric nonsense. there is not a single ounce of truth in this rubbish article.
This article is based on theories of race and migration that are far from accepted or even theorized.  It should be deleted without delay.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wideeyedraven (talk • contribs) 01:20, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Vargön

message: "Vargön is the idyll of a small town in Sweden and have about 10.000 habbitants".
Have the population increased with 100% since 2000?
It might be true, but I want proof for a lot of things in this article. For like "a factory called "Alloys" that's making metals and it has 2% of Swedens electricy bills". Sounds crazy to me. But then again, it might be true.
--Emas
The factory is actually called "Vargön alloys", and I know that it needs a lot of electricity, but 2%? sounds a bit too much...
:The Swedish wikipedia page for Vargön Alloys has a reference to a 2006 article which mentions them using 0.5%. Big disparity, but also very old data. I will try to dig into it. Radioswede (talk) 21:08, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated the Swedish page with data from 2018, which indicates modern energy usage is more like 0.03% (527.6GWh / 158TWh)of total electricity production. Removed the reference to energy usage completely as it's hardly noteworthy. Radioswede (talk) 21:30, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Holy Trinity Episcopal Church (Melbourne, Florida)

message: It is not on the National Register of Historic Places. Also, FieldMarine, I appreciate your efforts on creating articles about places on the Treasure and Space coasts, but I am quite concerned about your reverts of my attempts to improve this article. The parish is historic. The chapel building is historic. The building and the parish are intertwined. You really cannot separate the two. I don't want to get into a revert war with you. clariosophic (talk) 14:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is about a historic church building which is notable as outlined in Historic Brevard: Your Guide to Historic Landmarks in Brevard County by the Brevard Historical Commision.  The building is a landmark in the area.  The edits reverted made the article sound like it was about the parish, which includes a new church as well as the old church.  If the parish is notable (which I think it is (POV)), I recommend a separate article regarding the parish with a link to this building or including it in a separate section within this article.  Please include references to info added to the article, which the edits did not reflect.  Thanks.  FieldMarine (talk) 15:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hi, FieldMarine. I'm sorry but there seems to be no way to work with you on this.  so I've created a separate article on the parish. Best wishes. clariosophic (talk) 18:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Holy Trinity Episcopal Church (Melbourne, Florida)]]
Talk:Thematic equative

message: I've created this page as an amateur. Professional SFG people are asked to review it. Tony (talk) 14:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Hi Tony
good job. It seems to me that pseudo cleft is a more common name for the phenomenon you are describing. "Thematic equative" seems to be an SFG term. As soon as someone creates pseudo cleft, the SFG treatment thereof should be moved there to allow easy comparison with other approachesJasy jatere (talk) 18:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  synonym of pseudo cleft
Talk:WRAF (FM)

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for the women's branch of the Royal Air Force is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the military unit. - Dravecky (talk) 07:08, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Tourmakeady College

message: "Among the people who visited the school were Douglas Hyde (later to become the first President of Ireland), Patrick Pearse, Éamon de Valera, Kuno Meyer (the renowned German Gaelic scholar), Padraig Ó Domhnallain, and other Irish writers visited the school frequently."
This doesn't seem to be a proper sentence, because it makes no distinction between what are surely two groups of people. I suggest that a semi-colon is intended to go after Meyer, and that 'Ó Domhnallain and other Irish writers' are meant as those who visited frequently, but that's only a guess. Harfarhs (talk) 10:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who were the writers?
Talk:Traad

message: Clearly this was not a marine centre, it was a limnological research station  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haxbyct (talk • contribs) 11:53, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tullyhogue

message: I'm very sorry for this, but the domain www.triskelle.eu/ doesn't exist anymore.  - I used bymyself this site for many years and this is sad, but true. So maybe this reference should be taken out -- 88.65.240.154 (talk) 08:59, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triskele - Refernece 5 
Talk:Circumcision in the Bible

message: It has been proposed to move this page to Circumcision and religion.  Please discuss here.  --Coppertwig 00:05, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - I suggest leaving it for another week, though, just in case anyone disagrees. Jakew 21:00, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Wait -- maybe a different name might be better, as I want to copy info from "cultures and religion" section at Circumcision.  Maybe "Circumcision in cultures and relgions". --Coppertwig 21:40, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm. Ok, but let's spell it properly. :-) Is everyone happy about a move? If so, let's do it tomorrow. Jakew 22:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's a mistake. Take a look at what links to Circumcision in the Bible, it's almost always discussion of the Bible, hence the obvious and well defined title. If you wish to create a new article called Circumcision in cultures and religions, you should do so, and that new article could reference Circumcision in the Bible. Circumcision in the Bible as an article is already big enough, no need to broaden its scope. 64.149.83.66 (talk) 05:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Circumcision in the Bible doesn't strike me as a very good name because there's more than one different Bible mentioned in it, so the singular "the Bible" in the title doesn't make sense.  Also, it's focussed on a subset of religions, whereas a Wikipedia article, to be neutral, probably ought to either cover all religions or focus on one particular religion.  If the page is too long, perhaps someone could spin off sub-articles per summary style. --Coppertwig (talk) 23:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move to Circumcision and religion
Talk:Tyrone Guthrie Centre

message: This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... it is an artists retreat and a not for profit venture.I will rewrite it to tone it downCathar66 (talk) 16:55, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You better hurry. This was created by a soon-to-be blocked editor. Everything they did is going under the axe. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:36, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: A good if short article, maybe could be expanded? But a puzzle, where are the articles on Bernard Loughlin and Sheila Pratschke, at least? Both made (and Sheila P still makes) real contributions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.154.70.189 (talk) 08:49, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing articles 

message: The treatment of Bernard Loughlin by the then Board of the Centre should be included in the history. He and his wife built that Centre from a semi-ruin into a place of amazing sharing and creative development, and then, after they discovered that two of their children had been abused by a neighbour, instead of total support, they found themselves chucked out. After eighteen years of dedicated service, with as far as I know, no pension either. I leave it to your experts to include this in the right way, and I would not want to undermine the article's main thrust, as Annaghmakerrig is a wonderful place. But this tragic travesty was well-documented, and should not be whitewashed out of history. I would not go so far as to include the names of those who made the decision, but the basic facts are part of the Centre's history.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.154.70.189 (talk) 09:06, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History or whitewash?
Talk:Ulsterisation

message: Does anybody know what percentage of the British Army was recruited in Northern Ireland following this policy of "Ulsterisation", and what had been the percentage recruited from there beforehand? Thanks 89.101.101.75 (talk) 20:25, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: "Ulsterisation" is also used referring to the situation in Scotland after the referendum, e.g. The Guardian. This should be added to the article. --Gerd-HH (talk) 08:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scotland
Talk:Victoria Square Shopping Centre

message: I think that the article at Victoria Square, Belfast should be deleted and the little content on that page be incorporated here and this article renamed to Victoria Square, Belfast. Comments? Bjmullan (talk) 23:59, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article to Victoria Square, Belfast 

message: Give me reedem code Laxmi deviiiii (talk) 18:47, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Give me some redeem code
Talk:Jackass-barque

message: This could probably use at least a brief description of why the word "jackass" is used, which is what I came here looking for.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.252.181.48 (talk) 01:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of Name 
Talk:WRZE

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a school is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the Walnut Grove Secondary School. - Dravecky (talk) 07:29, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page
Talk:Wedge-shaped gallery grave

message: I propose that Wedge-shaped gallery grave be merged into Gallery grave. There simply is not enough content in this article to justify its own article.  I surveyed the literature, and it probably could not be improved much (even when fully cited and with more info added).  Rather, "wedge-shaped gallery grave" could be easily be explained in the context of "gallery grave", which would provide much-needed context.  "Gallery grave" is of a reasonable size that the merge will not cause the article size to swell or give undue weight. Tim1965 (talk) 16:50, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like to keep separate articles as they have different origin and range, although of course could be grouped into a larger type. I think your reading might be narrow, so no. Ceoil (talk) 04:44, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean "different origin and range"? - Tim1965 (talk) 21:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

text: Support the merge, on the grounds that even if they have different origin and range, they are best discussed (compared and contrasted perhaps) on the same page. See also Talk:Gallery grave#Merger proposal Klbrain (talk) 17:49, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal