lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Franches-Montagnes District

message: + Origin of the name
I thought it might be nice to include something on the origin of the name. I had heard it was from a tax free status but am not able to source this. Can anyone help? 
Nashernasher 14:49, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Linda

message: I understand that this disambiguation page isn't for everybody in the world with this name but Linda Chung has been pretty well known, especially in the Eastern countries mainly Hong Kong after winning the Miss Chinese International Pageant title and further perusing her career in TVB.
Some other examples of TVB Actors and Actresses on these kind of pages are like Bosco Wong, Selena Li and Charmaine Sheh. I don't see why another actress as famous as Linda shouldn't be listed here. --Scykei (talk) 09:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Because this is only a disambiguation page with all different kinds of things called Linda, the article about the female given name is Linda (name). Flying Saucer (talk) 21:59, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linda Chung
Talk:Czechoslovak Society of Arts and Sciences (SVU)

message: Shouldn't this article simply be called Czechoslovak Society of Arts and Sciences with SVU including a redirect/disambiguation to it?  — MapsMan [ talk | cont ] — 14:53, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
* Yes. The SVU is a Czech abbreviation (Společnost věd a umění) and should be removed from the title on en:. The SVU should not contain link here - SVU is a Czech abbreviation and not widely known throughout the English speaking world. Pavel Vozenilek 01:51, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: This organisation probably deserves an article here (after all they do exist for almost fifty years) but the tone of the current text is out of any proportion to their influence. Pavel Vozenilek 01:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: In article Kosmas - Czechoslovak and Central European Journal published by SUV I suggest to merge the contents here. More explanation is on Talk:Kosmas - Czechoslovak and Central European Journal page. Pavel Vozenilek 01:45, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge of Journal Kosmas
Talk:Helicobacter

message: The problem with this article is that 2 of the 4 paragraphs are about H. pylori (which has an awesome page about it, itself) instead of Heliobacter.  I'm removing the H. pylori information.  Let me know before reverting.
Jhay116 (talk) 14:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Entire article is on ''H. pylori''

message: This page needs some serious attention - it looks like somebody decided to transcribe their biology notes at the bottom of the page - and their grammar is atrocious. The information there should be verified and added to the article of pertinent.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.6.236 (talk) 13:40, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with this.  I'm making some revisions and adding a bit.
Jhay116 (talk) 14:13, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup? 
Talk:Sam Holden (author)

message: Which sarky anonymous toerag put in 'fellow Random House author'? It was clearly inserted in order to imply that the quote was simply a put up job by the publisher. It wasn't. The publisher had nothing to do with it, and Pearson doesn't normally give cover quotes. I sent her a copy, and she read it and seemed to enjoy it.
:: Charming language from you Mr Walters.  Was the statement factual or not?  Have you read WP:COI? Gillyweed 11:21, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:HM Factory, Gretna

message: Should the page be called "HM Factory, Gretna" or "H.M. Factory, Gretna"? Snowman 15:03, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does not really matter, other than wiki naming conventions. The full title was "His Majesty's Factory, Gretna", so the shorthand name was "M.H. Factory, Gretna". (The "Stationery Office", was "H.M.S.O." until quite recently; then it became "HMSO" and now it is TSO Ltd). I hardly think we need both names - one with a #redirect link.Pyrotec 15:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

text: For consistency it should be H. M. Factory, Gretna. I think that's also the more correct abbreviation. Even after 16 years. 86.187.235.44 (talk) 19:39, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of page 

message: The standard metric measure of land area is the hectare. Square kilometres is the appropriate measure to convert from square miles, but not from acres. 64andtim, why do you insist on  instead of ? 86.187.235.44 (talk) 19:46, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies, I accidentally clicked the wrong keypad and didn’t notice it. Hopefully that will never happen again. 64andtim (chat) 20:14, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries. I have now corrected the three instances. 86.187.235.44 (talk) 20:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hectares
Talk:Pyrococcus furiosus

message: I was doing a biology project and came upon more information about Pyrococcus furiosus at
this site
I hope this will help!
Helixer (talk) 20:23, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Info 

message: Sapra et al. (2003) describe ATP synthase in P. furiosus as proton-coupled. However, Pisa et al. (2007)  identify the single P. furiosus ATP synthase as being sodium-ion-dependent, although they do note that it "can transport protons". Can someone more familiar with the current literature reconcile these premises? Choess (talk) 05:39, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Respiratory system 

message: I'm not understanding why under the binomial name it is written "Erauso et al 1993", when this species was described and given the name Pyrococcus furiosus by Fiala and Stetter in 1986, in the first article that's in the bibliography.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyroph (talk • contribs) 00:43, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it's fixed now. - Kat Epicfroggz (talk) 02:12, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Binomial name 

message: — Assignment last updated by Mew77356 (talk) 23:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: MIBO 3500 Introduction to Microbiology
Talk:Methanococcus

message: This genus has recently been renamed Methanocaldococcus. Therefore I will redirect soon. Antorjal 15:06, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Methanocaldococcus does not yet appear to be valid, at least according to Euzéby (link here). -- MarcoTolo 22:28, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nomenclature
Talk:Nanoarchaeota

message: Might want to consider adding a discussion on this paper:
Brochier, C., Gribaldo, S., Zivanovic, Y., Confalonieri, F., and Forterre, P. "Nanoarchaea: representatives of a novel archaeal phylum or a fast-evolving euryarchaeal lineage related to Thermococcales?" Genome Biol. (2005) 6(5):R42.
(Genomiques (talk) 03:13, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brochier et al. 

message: — Assignment last updated by TingGu81 (talk) 03:04, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: EOSC 475 Marine Microbiology Spring 2023
Talk:Halobacterium

message: Comment:  Entries are present for both halobacerium and halobacteria. one is high-priority and one is low priority. Not my area, but someone might want to combine these.
70.230.176.130 (talk) 17:27, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:London Symphony Chorus

message: Not sure the Star Wars claim is correct. I'm pretty sure the choral contribution to the Phantom Menace soundtrack was the London Voices. See Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace (soundtrack).
--Cnbrb 15:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography 

message: An anonymous IP user keeps deleting (and reverting) what seems to be perfectly unproblematic text in the Notable recordings section. It's a couple of sentences which list selected discography and it is referenced. I can't see anything wrong with the text - if there is a particular problem in terms of WP policy I'll happily discuss and try to work out an improvement but as far as I can see, there's just someone repeatedly deleting perfectly OK text with no explanation, so I'm not sure what the motivation is. Anyone got a view? Cnbrb (talk) 16:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text deletion 
Talk:The Nighttime Price Is Right

message: Sorry to appear deletionist, but is there anything that separates this version from the daytime version other than its host? There is a brief summary at The Price Is Right (US game show) which seems suffice for this subject. The other primetime/syndicated entrants that arguably give reason to be split off the main article:
* The $1,000,000 Spectacular has thematic elements and, of course, the $1 million spin.
* The New Price Is Right (1994) was so drastically different, that a summary is not possible.
Point being, if these episodes had aired in the daytime (other than the host change) would anyone know the difference? I just don't think there's enough to merit a new article. Just my 2¢.—Twigboy 15:12, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the prod tag you placed on the article. This is not a well-named article, among other issues,  but it should be improved (or merged with the main The Price Is Right article), not deleted.  — Gavia immer (talk) 19:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I considered  first, but all (or nearly all) the material comes right from the main The Price Is Right article). Reconsider?—Twigboy 19:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently not, so as you suggest, I will tag as . I don't, however, see anything new in this article that is sourced, so anything that is merged over would compromise the GA status of the main article. Keep in mind, this program is still just The Price Is Right — the only differences are that it happened to air in the evening, was distributed through syndication, and it had a different host. The title was the same and the format was the same. All of this points to the need for a summary section in the main article, but not a new article.—Twigboy 14:38, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. JTRH 18:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No merge.  Just delete.  The entire premise of the article is incorrect -- it lists the 1972-1980 and 1985-1986 runs as a single series. -TPIRFanSteve 02:15, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Per the above, I'm converting the  tag back to . There has been little activity since its inception other than maintenance and unsubstantiated reverting of corrections. —Twigboy 19:22, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, it was previously prodded?  Then not only is the invalid reasoning for deletion a problem, so is adding the tag back.  You can try AFD if you want, but I doubt it'll fly.  FrozenPurpleCube 17:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've redirected the page to the main article.  There's no show by this title, and there was no information here that needed merged. -TPIRFanSteve 18:30, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why?
Talk:Kaplan turbine

message: A characteristic and necessary feature of a Kaplan turbine is a pivoting hub to allow the blade angles to be tilted.  The Bonneville powerhouse is said to have Kaplan turbines, but the picture now here is not a Kaplan as far as I can tell - no blade pivot! I removed the reference to my picture of a propeller blade runner and corrected the description on the Commons, though I found a lot of errors on the other pictures there. There is one actual (small) Kaplan turbine runner picture on the Commons but most of what's there are fixed pitch propeller runners or impossible to distinguish. --Wtshymanski 15:14, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's a Kaplan turbine, just covered with a lot of scale and rust - and the nose cone has been removed. Look at the root connection between the blades and the hub. --Duk 15:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, the structure at the bottom could be part of the servo for the blade angle - but it's a very rusty turbine indeed. (It may have been standing for months before they pulled it?  I wonder why they took the head cover out with the runner?) I wish the picture showed the blade pivots more clearly but even blowing up the image didn't convince me. I'll leave it in till we get a better one and I'll put the best one off Commons in the article, too. --Wtshymanski 17:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeh - I bet we can find a better one. --Duk 19:08, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Years later...new pictures on Commons, I added one that shows the blade root pivots better. --Wtshymanski (talk) 14:33, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Cromwell chafer beetle

message: Further work on referencing required. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:06, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Although the original specific epithet given to this species was lewisii (which is the correct Latinisation of Lewis), many references use lewisi, which is quite possibly just a spelling mistake, as it matches the more common form of a Latinised male surname. It's not Wikipedia's job to overturn a widely-established name, so the question is:
# When did the other spelling arise, and was it based on a nomenclatural decision, or just an accident?
# what is the relative prevalence of each form, especially in current literature?
Ideally we would move this page to Prodontria lewisii and set up a redirect from lewisi (the opposite of the current arrangement), and note that lewisi is a common spelling in the literature. —Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 19:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The answers to these questions are a grey area in zoological nomenclature. The short answer is that the issue just isn't worth wasting time on. In practical terms, the important thing is just that a search for either form of the name points to the same taxon ... Betweenfootandshoe (talk) 02:55, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct Latin name vs one in widest current use
Template talk:Time Persons of the Year/Archive 1

message: This really needs the collapsible feature added. It's very large and distracting in its current state.Rlevse 15:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Collapsible

message: Why do we have so many different templates, would it be easier to just have one, from the point of view of maintanance and readers? These could all just be replaced with this template:
*Template:Time Persons of the Year 1927–1950
*Template:Time Persons of the Year 1951–1975
*Template:Time Persons of the Year 1976–2000
*Template:Time Persons of the Year 2001–2025
Ultra two (talk) 12:40, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a good idea. Is there a possibility to call it with a parameter specifying which period should be expanded? —JAO • T • C 19:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why so many?
Talk:HARC

message: See my edit for my thoughts on why this ought to be a redirect, not a disambiguation. The Houston Advanced Research Center more commonly refers to itself as HARC, whereas the Hitachi product is very obscure. If the author of the disambiguation page feels it is important to have a link to Hitachi, perhaps a "if you were looking for the Hitachi product" link could be placed on the HARC article? (Though, I don't think this is necessary either) James2c19v 15:25, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Brain Battle

message: I calculated the chance of winning the jackpot by multiplying (3/16), (2/15), and (1/14).
Almost all of this information is an advertisement for the program, which is probably paid for and benefits Bell Canada: the only supplier for communicating with the program.  If you do not have Bell Canada as your provider, you cannot contact the program or participate in the contests.  All communication benefits Bell Canada.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.138.90.130 (talk) 16:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the official Global website, Brain Battle is only available on CIII and CIHF.
* It probably doesn't air on CHAN, CICT, CITV and CISA because they air an extra hour of news more than CIII.
* It probably doesn't air on NTV because of the affiliation with CTV.
* It probably doesn't air on CKMI because it is in Québec which has only a light Anglophone audience.
* I can't think of why it doesn't air on CFRE, CFSK, CKND.
The only times that the other channels have aired this show was Sunday at midnight, too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.232.206.206 (talk) 01:52, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a nationwide network show. 
Talk:Nosotros los Pobres

message: someone has added the categories "Films about cannabis" and "Mexican works about cannabis". I don't recall anything about cannabis in the film, and it does not seem to be mentioned in the article.  Is there any reason to add these categories?  Plazak (talk) 23:49, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No one explained how this movie is about cannabis, so I am removing those categories. Please do no re-add the categories without also adding content to the text of the article justifying the categories.  Thanks. Plazak (talk) 12:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  About cannabis? 

message: When Pepe confronts Ledo and his gang and is attacked by them in the cell, he manages to beat them with his own hands but no one dies. Ledo is the only one that ends with significant injuries by losing his eye and then he is tortured by Pepe to claim that Pepe is not guilty.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Travsam (talk • contribs) 20:41, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pepe didn't kill anybody
Talk:History of education in Taiwan

message: Modern schools were formed, with widespread establishment of primary schools, taught in Japanese
I removed the part about "taught in Japanese" because it doesn't fit with what we know about literacy rates and the prevalence of Japanese language in society.  When Mandarin Chinese was the language of instruction after the Chinese arrived, it quickly became the language most people know and quite often the lingua-franca.  However I've seen no indication Japanese took on this role, leading me to doubt the statement.  Literacy rate increases indicate that the education system was widespread and effective, so it would seem Japanese would be a much more common language had it been the language of instruction.  The whole article needs more sources, but this item is particularly dubious. Readin (talk) 06:26, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary education in Japanese 
Talk:Northern Valley Regional High School at Old Tappan

message: Regardless of your personal feelings, this section needs to be reworded:
Extracurricular activities
...The Student body as a whole views the club with disdain as it generally contains self-righteous homosexuals who are generally outcasts of school society.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.27.215.103 (talk) 22:26, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Greenwich Academy

message: - She was the first headmistress of Greenwich Academy
- While she worked at GA, the school grew 5 times as large as it was
- Significantly increased the quality of education at GA  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Computer7Class17 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruth West Campbell was important because... 

message: Edits from user Greenwich Academy in 2016; article still shaped by these edits. Tacyarg (talk) 22:05, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Edits from same year by GA Archives also look like possible CoI, as do later edits by WebGA1827 - 1827 being the year the school was established. Tacyarg (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (February 2022)
Talk:Attribute-oriented programming

message: *For example, a preprocessor may insert a logging program into the methods associated with a "logging" attribute.
**This sounds like aspect-oriented programming. Are there any similarities? --Abdull (talk) 18:07, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aspect-oriented programming 
Talk:First Battle of Kernstown order of battle: Union

message: According to the After Action Report of the battle by Lieut. Col. Philip Daum, Chief of Artillery:
"On Saturday, March 22, about 4 p.m., the enemy made all attack upon our forces near Winchester and on the turnpike leading to Strasburg. Battery H, First Regiment Ohio Volunteer Artillery, Capt. J. F. Huntington, was promptly placed in position, and opened fire upon the enemy, when they immediately retreated."
Official Records, Series I Volume 15, p359
Thus, I've removed the "not engaged" from Battery H
Castrass (talk) 02:12, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Celluloid ceiling

message: Don't know if there is any criteria to be mentioned on this page but producer Gale Anne Hurd (The Terminator, Aliens,  Armageddon (1998 film)) etc, seems a large omission. 220 of Borg 02:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion 

message: Hello! I added some additional explanatory text in the first paragraph to emphasize that the term refers to all positions in Hollywood, not just 'creative' positions. I made a grammatical change in the first paragraph and in the second paragraph I added the external link to the Center for the Study on Women in Television and Film.SliceLife (talk) 15:28, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification Edits 

message: I changed the Statistics section to The Celluloid Ceiling Report section. I added in a description of the report and methodology, updated statistics for 2017, and added info on USC initiative. SliceLife (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:01, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Celluloid Ceiling Report 

message: Hello Wikipedians! I made some major overhaul to the page to 1) increase the amount of factual information 2) update statistics 3) draw specific lines between the hiring and employment practices of practitioners v. actors 4) add in the recent EEOC investigation and results 5) pump up the reference section 6) minimize the number of hotlinks 7) remove the section that listed women filmmakers--I felt by removing the selected list the page would be more representative and inclusive of all women who work in the industry. Thanks!SliceLife (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 02:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Overhaul
Talk:Genuine Risk

message: 2 entries in bibliography are on yachts not subject. Also date for photo of Genuine Reward does not match text dates of horse's residence at retirement farm Jec352 (talk) 15:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  bibliography
Talk:Victoria University of Bangladesh

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.vub.edu.bd/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Worldbruce (talk) 15:23, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Riekoperla darlingtoni

message: The article text currently reads "the species was first collected by Darlington in 1931". Is this the biologist Cyril Dean Darlington (1903 - 1981)? If so, it would be a good idea to link to the bio article. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 22:33, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of contra-indication, I'm drawing the link now. --gråb whåt you cån (talk) 11:19, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  C. D. Darlington?