lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:James of Saint George

message: His name includes "Saint" in the title and throughout the first paragraph and into the second. Then suddenly we discuss his name, using "St", with no apparent justification, not even from what the name is derived from. Consistency, please? Maybe future edits would be easier if we were allowed to have a template "StG" to display "Saint George"?! (In case any readers wonder why I am straying into mediaeval military history, the reason is that he has a page on the Civilization Wiki, and it links here.) Robin Patterson (talk) 04:59, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency in naming?
Talk:Inca architecture

message: by looking at the newest aspects, then it becomes quite clear that at in machu picchu the copper age Inca build on top of far superior walls, which are shown on photos in this article. So we can't say, the Inca have done it all, they took over the core of machu picchu for a previous culture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikigetsme123 (talk • contribs) 07:11, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  pre Inca architecture was taken over by the Inca and they build rough on to of it
Talk:Hurricane shutter

message: “Although the negative pressure caused by high velocity wind flowing over a building roof can cause the roof to fail with the building envelope intact”
I believe this statement is missleading with faulty reference. It is missleading because the increased internal pressure of the structure does far more than the decreased external pressure to cause a roof to fail. The reference is faulty because the cited source even states that both are a factor – and thus does not support the statement.GromXXVII (talk) 22:54, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missleading statement.
Talk:Hunky punk

message: For a start, is it "hunky punk" (as used in the article title) or "hunkypunk", as used in most of the article.  I assume both are acceptable to the article should start "A hunky punk or hunkypunk is..."  The article title suggests that capitalization is required.  Is it?
More significantly, The article contradicts itself in various ways about what a hunky punk actually is and what is the difference between hunky punks, gargoyles and grotesques.  The articles on gargoyles and grotesques state that the distinction between them is that gargoyles are waterspouts, whereas grotesques are just ornamentation.
This article starts by saying that a hunky punk is a form of gargoyle local to Somerset in the UK.  In the second paragraph, we are told that hunky punks are absolutely decorative; this means they are not gargoyles but grotesques.  Then, in the third paragraph, it is stated that hunky punks are not just restricted to Somerset but can be found all over the world.  So which is it?  Are they gargoyles or just grotesques?  Are they only found in Somerset or are they everywhere?  If they are found world-wide, and are not only in the style of a squatting figure, surely 'hunky punk' is just a Somerset dialect term for 'grotesque' (or maybe 'gargoyle')? Dricherby (talk) 20:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: And what is the relationship between these characters and Chimera (architecture).  Same? Different? Or, something else?  Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 22:24, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 

message: A photo request has been added. There are lots of pics on the  Hunky Pinks project but I am having problems finding any which are licenced for reused in a way which would enable them to be used on wikipedia. Does anyone have any?— Rod talk 17:43, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo Request 

message: As far as I can tell, this is just a regional name for a grotesque. No concrete distinction is given, nor is apparent in any of the photos at the site above. This should just be merged with Grotesque (architecture). OrangeDog (τ • ε) 08:33, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Heritage Documentation Programs

message: I've created a biography stub for notable HABS/HAER photographer Jet Lowe.  Since Wikipedia and Commons contain many photographs by him, it would be worthwhile to improve the article.  (Everyone is including photographer credit on HABS/HAER images they upload, right?)  121a0012 07:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jet Lowe 

message: I enlarged the squinty little thumbnails, but I don't know how to put them in a grid -- if that's even necessary?? Someone who knows HTML may want to fiddle with this. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 19:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery

message: I have removed the gallery in accordance with WP:NOTREPOSITORY and WP:Gallery. A gallery does not seem necessary for this article; the same descriptive value can be provided by regular images in the appropriate sections. (Consider creating a gallery on Wikimedia Commons instead.) In accordance with that philosophy, I've moved the extant images of the National Bank and the Rocky Flats control panel into appropriate sections and included drawings from the same surveys, so the images serve as a good illustrations of typical HABS/HAER records. The HALS record for Hale O Pi' Ilani Heiau does not contain any photographs, so I selected a different site. I tried to maintain the selection of subjects from different times and places. However, the page is currently not long enough to justify use of all these images. For the sake of readability, I've commented out the HAER and HALS image templates, but they can conveniently be added back if the sections grow longer. The other images that were in the gallery might be useful when the HABS/HAER/HALS sections have enough content to justify their own page. (Editors from the future, use the former version.) Knight of Truth (talk) 01:23, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery removal and image use
Talk:John Aidan Liddell

message: Does anyone know anything about this section?  Do we have permission to include it here?  Should we merge it into the main article?  What do people think? Cjrother 17:59, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This looks very like a Copyright violation. I've removed this section. Kernel Saunters (talk) 11:40, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further information 
Talk:Hangar

message: This article is clearly lacking in quality and content. There are plenty of inspecific statements. The part about airship hangars needs significant work. (This may work better as a separate article.) Willy Logan 06:42, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: I watched a TV special on the History channel about Santos-Dumont that claiming that he was the inventor of the Hangar. In which By 1898 he used to store his small dirigibles already inflated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Classic1010 (talk • contribs) 09:36, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The First Uses of the Hangar.  

message: What is the history of the term "hangar"? Were there "hangars" before there were aircraft to put into them, or did the first users of airships invent a structure to put them in, and coin a word, "hangar", to go with them? It seems unlikely to me somehow that someone would just dig back into history and come up with this word derived from archaic language just to describe a structure used to house airships. It seems much more likely that a "hangar" was a type of large, open structure for covering large objects or storing goods in, and this pre-existing word was co-opted for use with airships. I ask because I was reading Kipling's "An Error in the Fourth Dimension" (from "A Day's Work"), and he refers to a place called "Holt's Hangars", which seems to be related to a railway in the context. This was 1895, so it may have referred to an airship hangar, but I don't think so. I think this was a term that was already in use and understood, which took on a new meaning when they used the term to denote an aircraft shelter. Note, I am NOT asking this for my personal curiosity, nor attempting to use Wikipedia as a "forum"; I bring this up because I think the article would be improved by covering this subject. 70.109.132.119 (talk) 23:31, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the article would be improved by including more history of the term.  If it has a French etymology, who decided that the term should be applied to a structure that houses aircraft, and when? 174.130.201.115 (talk) 14:41, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of "hangars" as a structure?
Talk:Greenway (landscape)

message: I have tried to add images that illustrate what I believe to be true greenways. Rwood128 (talk) 16:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images
Talk:Greenfield land

message: Is it necessary to have this section explaining an unrelated field's definition of greenfield? It seems to be confusing and distracting from the little information is there. -- Luisricardodelarosa (talk) 02:11, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Cable industry section

message: I oppose the proposed merger.  "Greenfield project" and "greenfield land" are two fairly distinct concepts, and seem to deserve their own entry.  It may be possible to combine them as instances of the concept "greenfield", but that seens a little to general to me. -- kaosfere 15:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merger

message: The photo from Germany shows an empty plot between two buildings. Although it's overgrown this looks like a brownfield site, because it must have previously been built on.  I suggest removing this picture, as it's confusing.  A rural picture would be more appropriate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gymnophoria (talk • contribs) 14:12, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No it wasn't, and has been removed now. thanks. --Elekhh (talk) 05:26, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Is picture greenfield?

message: Is a greenfield scheduled to be turned into a construction site? German interwiki link goes to :de:Baulücke... --katpatuka (talk) 06:34, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  schedule of greenfield?
Talk:Ides

message: I think the "Integrated Data Environments" is kinda bogus, as a sharepoint expert I have heard it refered to a a collaboritive enviroment but never and IDE.  Anyone framiliar with this term?
: I'm the one that added that meaning.  Where I work (US aerospace industry) it's quite common as an acronym (technically abbreviation, actually—no one pronounces it "ide").  I'm familiar with at least three companies that use the term: Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and Boeing.  The program I work on even has an "integrated data environment" all to itself.  If no one else thinks it's a common meaning, I'm happy to get rid of it, but as I say, it's a term I hear on a daily basis.  —Ryan McDaniel 02:51, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Integrated Data Environment

message: Do we have any evidence for this para? m.e. 06:46, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur; that was the only edit of User:Yibbels and I can find nothing to corroborate it. deleted. --AlisonW 11:01, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  intimidate, demoralize, emasculate, subjugate
Talk:Terlizzi

message: I got here while looking for the artist Diterlizzi. Mathiastck 18:00, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Vavilov Center

message: This great man, who devoted his life to combat the famine, was murdered by famine in prison.He was another of the more than 100,000,000 of mrders by communism since 1917.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.9.89.230 (talk) 14:43, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Another communism's victim
Talk:German town law

message: The Ring is a German dialect word for a central place. Is the ring here a right worg for a quadratic square? Xx236 08:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Magocsi doesn't give any examples of that specific type, so I'll remove it in the absence of further information. Olessi 15:48, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I can only add that the commonly used German Name for the Old Town Square in Prague is "Altstädter Ring", and I was always wondering about that... --BjKa (talk) 14:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  ring 

message: File:Date-of-charter-timeline.png : Should be Halle an der Saale and not "Salle". --BjKa (talk) 14:49, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Picture 

message: : Litoměřice law and codes based on that of Nuremberg, such as Old Prague and Cheb law, were introduced into Bohemia during the reign of King Wenceslaus I, while German colonists introduced Brünn (Brno) and Olmütz (Olomouc) law in Moravia.
Please, , because in my opinion, this is completely wrong. Yes, most of the Bohemia (meaning, not Moravia nor Silesia) used Nuremberg law (i.e., NOT the Magdeburg one), except for the group of cities in the North of the country, mainly exactly Litoměřice, Louny, and Žatec, which were based on the Magdeburg Law. When in 1579 the Emperor Rudolf II. approved cs:Koldínův zákoník as the universal code of the municipal law, which was based on the Prague law (based on the Nuremberg one), these Magdeburg-oriented cities objected and delayed using of the code until 1610. (see the linked Czech page with your preferred translator, they do rather decent job on it). Koldín’s Code of the Urban Law was in parts effective in the Czech lands until 1811, when ABGB finally took over.
Ceplm (talk) 07:26, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Litoměřice Law
Talk:Forever Kingdom

message: So, this is my first attempt at creating a new article. The only other page I've done major work on is Magna Carta, so I'm still pretty inexperienced. I have plans to beef this article up quite a bit, though I'll need some time to get a few images together, and work on my editing skills. grendale 18:01, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Whew!

message: Does the Forever Kingdom have any connections at all with the Forever Knights?
Sincerely, DanMat6288 (talk) 00:29, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forever Knights
Talk:Gatehouse

message: states : and in 1390 the gatehouse that still survives was built . So 16th century? Aleichem 11:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[St Augustine's Abbey]] 

message: What about the Temple Bar, London? It's not even mentioned. Thundercloud (talk) 17:25, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: London

message: None of these are archetypes of the gatehouse. Most are not military examples. Mostly its just a bunch of "stuff". 99.241.105.253 (talk) 00:02, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs a re-write and the examples are terrible. 

message: Any article without a proper definition is close to useless. The user is left to guess. The German Torhaus apparently describes buildings either attached to gates or enclosing them, but the English term is used for complex fortified gate structures of various types which always include the gate passage itself. I have this from interpreting the context in various archaeological articles, which are not covering the whole field anyway, and here we need sources and clear definitions. This page is still just a collection of words & pictures that don't add up to constitute an answer to the basic questions one approaches an encyclopedic article with: what? why? when? how? and so on. Arminden (talk) 21:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  See above; still no proper definition, systematics (evolution, types) 
Talk:Gate

message: Should there be a second page go explain the meaning of Gate in "Watergate" "Portraitgate", etc.? (69.38.192.210 (talk) 17:44, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm certainly not a knowledgeable Wikipedia editor, but I don't think "This article needs additional citations for verification" or that "adding citations to reliable sources" would "improve this article".  And how could anybody challenge or remove any of the "unsourced material" currently here?  I think adding more unsourced information would improve this article (talking about reasonably).  As such, I am removing or reverting the January 2013 whatever-wikipedia-calls-it thing at the top.  THAT would improve this article, I think.  Who thinks the article was improved by adding that besides whoever added it?  Certainly not me.  Damn.  76.102.145.62 (talk) 16:21, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia seems pretty terrible sometimes 

message: The Japanese "torii", Korean "Hongsalmun", and Chinese "Paifang" are not the same as "gate".(The same goes for Korean "Iljumun"(or 'Iljoomoon'.)
They are shaped like a gate, but do not serve any purpose of control like a normal gate, but rather serve as a 'signpost' (some of Japan's torii are even built in the sea, so how can a torii in the sea serve as a gate!) -Dreamy (talk) 04:03, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The role of the 'gate' and the "torii" (Hongsalmoon, Paifang, and Iljumun)
Talk:Gable stone

message: It'd be nice to have a picture of one of these with a visual pun for the article Visual pun. So if you have such a picture, but thought this page was too crowded for it, then there's another page that would love to have it! --Toby Bartels 19:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of visual pun? 
Talk:Fused grid

message: I feel this article does a really bad job of explaining what the fused grid actually *is*. It talks at length about historical background and specific considerations but lacks a decent introduction. 84.51.129.102 (talk) 17:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree. This is just rambling without a clear topic.77.13.150.96 (talk) 22:58, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Globalize template - this whole article assumes a North American reader. other parts of the world (with perhaps the exception of the uk) are only used as "the other" to show differences to the US situation ,--178.5.25.138 (talk) 15:37, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize  
Talk:Frontispiece

message: I strongly recommend [[disambiguation}} since these are concepts with the same word, but different meaning, both of which are important in their respective realms. --Ludvikus 22:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done the book one.  I'll leave the architecture one up to someone else -- TimNelson (talk) 02:17, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Neelix (talk) 02:19, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Bibliophily]]
Talk:Forum (Roman)

message: Please complete the sentence:  "Every Italian had a forum."   Every settlement?  Every city?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.142.66.25 (talk) 20:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete : Every Italian had a forum.
Talk:Flying buttress

message: I note there is a big sticker on this section about it not being very encyclopedic in tone.
Actually, it reads as a very unemotive and academic assessment of the aesthetic qualities of the subject and about as appropriate as can be imagined.
I don't see why this sticker is on there; it lends to the reader's mind a suggestion that the content is, perhaps, not to be taken very seriously or even to be considered valid. It actually comes over as counter-productive. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:F829:88FE:A35F:9B9A (talk) 21:34, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aesthetic style
Talk:Flèche (architecture)

message: I dont know if its the same, but it seems to be so I sudgest to move it to better English expression.--Juandev (talk) 06:46, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The above user inserted a "nowiki"  marker into the article at the same time as posting the above comment. Howevere a flèche is NOT a ridge turret - it's clearly a French form of steeple, as explained in the relevant articles. I therefore expanded the ridge turret article a few moments ago for clarity (it was previously a single short sentence article), and I am now deleting this article's "move" template marker, as inappropriate/resolved. Pete Hobbs (talk) 12:32, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved per request.  Favonian (talk) 09:35, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 May 2022
Talk:Finial

message: There really isn't any reason for a hip-knob to have its own entry. There were previous attempts to delete it because it was not significant enough, but it should be redirected to this page and the little content added here. Bangabandhu (talk) 06:32, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal  
Talk:Extension agency

message: I've started to tidy the "agency" stuff which includes government uses of the term, business uses and a scattering of other meanings. I've changed the category here to bring this article within the main big grouping :Category:Agency for the present. But I'm wondering whether a new sub-category might be needed. --Mereda 07:07, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New category needed?
Talk:Environmental planning

message: Added a link to environmental justice.Greenopedia (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Elements of Environmental Planning

message: A major portion of this article focuses on Environmental planning in Australia. I would suggest that this be spun off to a separate article on that topic, with the more broadly relevant material remaining here, and a brief overview of environmental planning in Australia. DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 10:28, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Note that there is also a relatively new article on Urban planning in Australia which probably should be linked. --ELEKHHT 21:09, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unbalanced 

message: Sirs, Consider including in the list indicated for NSW Planning legislation on the Environmental Planning page, the Environmental Planning Assessment Amendment Act 2012, as well. See Ref: http://www5.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/nsw/num_act/epaaaa2012n93496.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apaludet (talk • contribs) 23:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates to Environmental Planning page 

message: Hi, I am adding a new section regarding environmental justice and its relation to environmental planning. Hannahazimi (talk) 20:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Subheading: Environmental Justice 

message: I plan on adding a section under the US portion about climate action plans, the EPA, and LEED as a form of environmental planning evaluation. I also wanted to add a section to the general portion about anticipatory governance. Any advice or issues?Ssshobei (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  adding to US section and general planning section
Talk:Encaustic tile

message: There have been repeated attempts to add a reference [http://www.encaustictiles.net/what-are-encaustic-tiles/production-of-encaustic-tiles.html} to the article. The article as it stands refers to ceramic encaustic tiles which are made of clay and fired in a kiln, the reference refers to cement encaustic tiles which are made of cement and are NOT fired in a kiln. If someone wants to write a section on cement encaustic tiles, I have no problem with the reference being used. Theroadislong (talk) 20:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cement encaustic tiles
Talk:Emergency exit

message: An external link looks like spam. I am going to remove it. Does anyone know how to source info on exit doors that have alarms on opening?--Canoe1967 (talk) 20:21, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:   Spam link etc. 