Talk:Biodiversity hotspot

message: Only a small percentage of the total land area within biodiversity hotspots is now protected. What is this percentage worldwide? My search yielded numbers for individual countries ranging from 6-27%.Marcus 04:26, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I was wondering whether indiginous peoples can be mentioned as a tool to police biodiversity hotspots. Some ethnic groups have expressed willingness to act as a "forest police" to protect a zone from illegal logging, dumping of waste, ...
See 
* Reducing_Emissions_from_Deforestation_and_Forest_Degradation
* Talk:Indigenous_peoples#Participation_in_REDD
91.182.214.13 (talk) 07:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Mention indiginous peoples ?

message: Perhaps Marine lakes need to be mentioned ? Not sure whether all of these are situated within biodiversity zones, so could be of value to mention it here
KVDP (talk) 07:42, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Marine lakes

message: According to Edward O. Wilson, the price to conserve an area would be as low as 25 USD per hectare in developing countriesPrice of conserving an area as low as 25 USD per hectare
I think it's notable enough to mention here ?
109.130.218.206 (talk) 13:35, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Price of conserving an area

message: According to Oxfam, the richest 80 people in the world hold 50% of all financial world of the entire world (1636 billion euro), see http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/wealth-having-it-all-and-wanting-more-338125, so if the these richest people would spend 1% (see http://onepercentfortheplanet.org/ ) to 10% of their wealth to buy up as much as possible land in the biodiversity hotspot regions, the regions could be protected much better. This, as the new owners can then demand the land to be made into no-go zones for people, and eliminate access paths and further development of infrastructure/access in these regions. That will in turn result in a elimination of illegal logging, and poaching (wood and bush meat/animal trade), as well as increased water and air pollution (from new/old factories). It hence will help to conserve our biodiversity, and also ensure that the ecosystem services of these zones (forests producing oxygen, filtering out toxic compounds from water/air, ...) continue to serve them, as well as the poor (as services are supplied to all people on the earth).
For the rich people buying up the forest, it is also beneficial/good investment, as the forests will never fall in financial value much (unlike regular currency), having land with much biodiversity will also become a status symbol, and it finally also benefits the poor as well (so helps them in promoting their public relations)
The amount that is payed by the mentioned 80 people will be used to compensate the poor people that owned the land (and/or the local government that still held unsold sections of biodiversity hotspots -destined for development-). The poor people can use that to relocate to nearby major cities. By relocating here, they might attain a more comfortable and hygienic living standard, and their pressure on the nearby environment is reduced significantly.
109.130.180.144 (talk) 10:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Richest 80 people buying up biodiversity hotspots

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Biodiversity hotspot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070808183125/http://www.birdlife.org:80/datazone/sites/index.html to http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/sites/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:59, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The current definition includes "is under threat by humans". This was added by an anonymous user in  a 2010 revision. 
The criteria for defining a biodiversity hotspot does not include humans (only habitat destruction), and there was no source added to affirm the 'human destruction' means for the definition.
I suggest changing it back to "that is threatened with destruction." or "that has experienced large amounts of habitat loss."
-Earboxer (talk) 04:44, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Biodiversity Hotspot 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Biodiversity hotspot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120320054336/http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/xp/hotspots/Documents/hotspots_revisited_2004.zip to http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/xp/hotspots/Documents/hotspots_revisited_2004.zip
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120324024634/http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/xp/Hotspots/resources/pages/maps.aspx to http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/xp/Hotspots/resources/pages/maps.aspx
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:22, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Biodiversity hotspot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120327075212/http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/xp/hotspots/Documents/cihotspotmap.pdf to http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/xp/hotspots/Documents/cihotspotmap.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070101130955/http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/xp/Hotspots/ to http://www.biodiversityhotspots.org/xp/Hotspots/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Could someone edit the hotspot map to add Hotspot #36, the North American Coastal Plain? I don't have much knowledge of editing svg files, so I can't do it myself.Geekgecko (talk) 17:21, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Have you tried contacting the user who originally made it? Perhaps they could help, though they do not seem very active recently. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 12:49, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coastal Plain 

message: How many hot spot in the world? 132.154.39.90 (talk) 06:02, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many hot spot in the world? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Acryan1 (talk) 13:54, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Conservation biology

message: The redirect Evaluate biodiversity hotspot criteria has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:37, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Evaluate biodiversity hotspot criteria]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]