Talk:Lord Botetourt High School

message: :Image:LBHS Cavs.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 08:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:LBHS Cavs.gif

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:21, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for , or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation. 
Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.—triwbe (talk) 16:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would certainly like to improve this article in anyway I can. I have already added some sources, images, links, and text. What all needs to be corrected, added, or deleted? --II Ross II (talk) 15:19, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice: This article lacks [[WP:A]] to establish {{ #switch: {{lc:Schools}}
| academics = [[WP:PROF]]
| biographies = [[WP:BIO]]
| people = [[WP:BIO]]
| companies = [[WP:CORP]]
| groups = [[WP:CORP]]
| fiction = [[WP:FICTION]]
| movies = [[WP:MOVIE]]
| music = [[WP:MUSIC]]
| schools = [[WP:SCL]]
| web = [[WP:WEB]]
| proposed = [[WP:N]]}}

message: I have removed the :Category:Flagged articles from
the message above 
. it was flagged at least two months ago by Some Other Editor, 
but the current version looks OK to me. Avicennasis @ 05:46, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Flagged articles]]