lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Parore

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 06:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Parore is only a local name...as indicated in this stub.  The official name in Australia (NSW, at least) is Luderick.  The term 'black bream' is used for another fish in NSW.   Surely the topic should be titled using the scientific name  Girella tricuspidata.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.28.71.160 (talk) 17:26, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect topic name ?? 

message: The photo of me fishing from a river breakwall was removed...can it be put back please? 112.141.19.25 (talk) 06:33, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There's not really enough space on the page for both photos - I'll put the other one back in because it has a nicer composition, but usually requesting this doesn't have any bearing on if it'll be used (so there's a chance another photo more clearly showing fishing techniques will replace it in the future). --Prosperosity (talk) 00:04, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo removed
Talk:Orange clownfish

message: I emailed someone at the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority and got the numbers for collection permits. They are as follows:
 Collection permits issued
Fiscal Year	Permits Issued
06/07      	91
05/06      	84
04/05      	98
03/04      	102
02/03      	90
01/02      	96
00/01      	113
The woman I contacted told me a more detailed breakdown into categories could be investigated but would require fees and paperwork under the freedom of information act. These numbers don't seem significant enough to merit the sentence in the article about the numbers of permits in relation to the movie Finding Nemo. The information was sent to me from Margaret Stokes:
(Margaret Stokes
Permit Systems Manager
Environmental Impact Management
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority
PO Box 1379
TOWNSVILLE  QLD  4810
Tel: +61 7 4750 0872
Fax: +61 7 4772 6093)
Esoxidt 15:33, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collection permit increase 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Oppose inappropriate capitalization, but support Orange clownfish.  Dicklyon (talk) 04:54, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fishes/to do

message: * Standardize on class Actinopterygii, not Osteichthyes (see Special:Whatlinkshere/Osteichthyes)
* Of Argentinidae:
** Expand Argentina silus 	-- Greater Argentine  
** Argentina sphyraena -- 	Argentina (fish)
* Of Chimaera:
** Elephantfish, Callorhinchus callorynchus (:image:Callorhinchus callorynchus.jpg)
What does this mean: "Standardize on class Actinopterygii (not Osteichthyes): Chimaera"? Chimaera is not in either Actinopterygii or Osteichthyes. Koumz (talk) 22:10, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

message: Adding the  template to a page will direct the attention of WP's copy editors to the page. We have approximately bimonthly drives that improve thousands of articles. Lfstevens (talk) 17:02, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy-edit requests 

message: I noticed what seems to be a crying need on Wikipedia and write this here today to ask you to fill this gap.  While I gather that there have been enough studies on the subject of wild guppies, the article Guppy knows practically nothing about them; almost the entire article is about the domesticated strains.  What of their life in the wild?  How different are they from the more familiar domesticated strains?  What do they eat, how have they evolved, what predators do they have, and what of their place in their native ecosystem?  Eventually, there might be enough to split the articles and allow one to consentrate on the aquarium fish and another about their wild cousins.  In addition, I have seen on Google Scholar studies done about feral guppies, another thing the article knows nothing about.  Guppy is a pretty good article about an aquarium fish, but that's not all guppies are. 
Thanks! Chrisrus (talk) 05:33, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Almost no info about wild guppies on Wikipedia! 

message: I started an article on Lucania goodei and would like it to be added to the list of articles that need to be expanded.Mmyers1976 (talk) 15:26, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand Article Request

message: Just uploaded a series of photographs of several species of Lethrinus and Gymnocranius, including several recently (2010 and 2013) described species. A good opportunity for ichthyologists who want to create new pages. Jeanloujustine (talk) 21:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New images of ''Lethrinus'' spp. and ''Gymnocranius'' spp. (Lethrinidae)
Talk:Sergeant major (fish)

message: This fish has been determined to be widespread in the Mediterranean. It is even found in the Eastern Mediterranean, where it has become locally numerous. It has also been photographed in Spanish waters. It was previously thought that they were Abudefduf vaigiensis from the Red Sea.
New study (2015) which shows that the fish are Abudefduf saxatilis, via genetics:
http://www.aquaticinvasions.net/2015/AI_2015_Tsadok_etal.pdf
Older (2013) study, which shows pictures of a Sergeant Major in Tarragona, Spain. At this time it was still thought that the other Abudefduf found in the Mediterranean was the Red Sea species, but they are actually also Abudefduf Saxatilis rather than Abudefduf vaigiensis.
http://www.reabic.net/journals/mbi/2013/2/MBI_2013_2_Azzurro_etal.pdf
2.104.41.248 (talk) 00:31, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  It has been photographed and caught in the Mediterranean sea 

message: Glory to the coral reef 2610:130:109:14:6485:5DE5:A1EF:611 (talk) 18:43, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sir yes sir
Talk:Chromis fumea

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:30, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Bluefish

message: Where is it called bluefish? What percentage of readers is likely to recognise the fish by this name? · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 16:04, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fisheries have been calling it "bluefish" for at least 300 years.  What exactly are you looking for by demanding "what percentage of readers" will recognize bluefish by name, when it's the most popular and best known of all fishes referred to as "bluefish"?Mr Fink (talk) 01:19, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Most English speakers outside of South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 04:00, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name?
Talk:Port St. Joe, Florida

message: I oppose this proposal, as there is no historical connection between the two, other than that they both took their names from St. Joseph Bay. -- Donald Albury(Talk) 16:03, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger of [[St. Joseph, Florida]] into this article 

message: A recent edit says there is no rail service to Port St. Joe. The most recent news I have found about rail service to Port St. Joe is this, which implies that the Appalachian Northern rail route was still in use last year, with plans for attracting industries along the route. The route shown on the map in the article doesn't correspond with what I remember of the AN route, though. Can anyone point to reliable sources about this? - Donald Albury 16:51, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rail service
Talk:Scup

message: "Scup" is an abbreviation of an Algonquin, perhaps Wampanoag, name for this fish.  Does anyone have any further information on the etymology?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.253.22.123 (talk) 15:25, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 'mishscuppaug' is the full name, as found in an old Mirriam Webster dictionary from the 1940's.  The word ending in 'aug' indicates the plural form.  Other examples of Algonquin names for edible fauna include 'tautaug', a fish and quahaug, a hard-shelled clam. 67.244.37.80 (talk) 14:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Archosargus probatocephalus

message: You might want to check your facts  the origin of the name "Sheepshead" or "Sheephead" for this fish. I have lived in Beaufort and Charleston South Carolina since 1971 and have fished for this fish many times.  I was told over thirty years ago the name came from the shape of the face, and especially the teeth.  The teeth look like human teeth or sheep teeth. My inof could be wrong, but you might want to check.  
Thanks,
Mitch Lucas
mlucas88@knology.net 
69.73.6.76 03:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I feel like this article could use some expansion, particularly in regards to the range and overall population of this species.  The only data we have is that it's listed as, "Least Concern."  Would anyone be interested in getting some more info about the population and fishery to add to the article?
MrJ567 (talk) 03:42, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population and Range 

message: * https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/sheepshead-fish-human-teeth-plucked-north-carolina-coast-180978396/
* https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58105044
70.124.147.243 (talk) 02:06, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources on the fish caught in North Carolina
Talk:Parioglossus marginalis

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:46, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: Hi there Divingpetrel, I got caught in an edit conflict, making identical changes you have just made to the article.  I note however, that the edit comment in your move to the scientific name you said you can find no evidence that this fish is in fact called the dart goby.  You may have missed this (not sure whether we want to add that to the reference list).  However, this is not a particularly common fish and not well known, so I agree that leaving it at the scientific name makes sense. - Nick Thorne talk 01:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  common name
Talk:Cobia

message: I don't often edit smaller natural sciences articles, so I wonder if the use of the fish on Iron Chef America (Oliver vs Battali) is of any note? ThuranX (talk) 03:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As long as you have a reference (website, book, magazine etc) to back it up, please feel free to add it (with the reference). Kare Kare (talk) 10:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? 

message: In Distribution and Habitat there is a comment from Alan Davidson (I suppose that this must be the food writer, but without a hyperlink this is unclear), but it is not footnoted as to where it comes from. Metre01 (talk) 03:24, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for References?
Talk:Blaze and Satanus

message: The character created by Marv Wolfman wasn't named Lord Satanus, wasn't a demon, and came from the future. The character introduced in Demon War was almost certainly inspired by Wolfman's evil sorcerer, but he's not the same character. See the comicvine entries for Lord Satanis and Lord Satanus. Daibhid C (talk) 22:26, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree - there seems no direct connection. I have moved the Satanis stuff to Lord Satanis. -- Beardo (talk) 02:54, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Satanis

message: Shouldn't the picture from the cover to Reign in Hell Special be used as the top picture of this page, and the original one be deleted as it really does not show much for this article? 24.58.239.42 (talk) 23:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures
Talk:Salmon run

message: There are plenty of videos and informal articles that document and reference bears benefiting from fish ladders. Are there any experts or citable sources that weigh in on the effectiveness of fish ladders, and whether they tip the balance in the favor of bears?--Semitones (talk) 20:45, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bears and Fish Ladders 

message: See this: https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/why-do-salmon-change-color-and-die-after-they-spawn
Tondelleo Schwarzkopf (talk) 21:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most Atlantic Salmon die after spawning? Are we sure about that? 

message: Hello . You wrote  Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting#Article title terms. It is standard practice to bold the first occurrence of a redirect term in an article. I hope this sufficiently answers your question. Thanks and have a great day. –Novem Linguae (talk) 08:36, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi . I didn't notice your bolding of zombie fish. Apologies - you were correct to do that. But what I did notice was that you also changed "a couple of weeks" to "a couple weeks". That was the reason for my dig. Regards. — Epipelagic (talk) 09:12, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert 

message: That picture seems to show little about the salmon run itself and more about grizzly bear hunting behaviour. Perhaps another one would fit better. Prinsgezinde (talk) 17:04, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture?
Talk:St. Elizabeth Catholic High School

message: I'm starting to show my age with this post, but back then it was called "The Edge".  Was it vandelism, or did the paper change names? --AlphaTwo 22:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: School paper

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as it provides more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub, although it needs much more referencing. I have assessed this as low importance, as it is a highly specific topic within Canada. Cheers, CP 04:27, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Dana Delany/Archive 1, Links To E2E Nude Vidcaps

message: Providing info specifically about nude scenes and providing links to nude vidcaps doesn't seem to serve much in terms of encyclopedic information. Especially since nudity was not really the point of Exit to Eden. It seems the intent here is more about objectifying Ms Delany, and personal prurient expression. For more specific details about her work the links to her website and IMDB are available. And, strictly speaking, those vidcaps are a copyright violation.Rphunt 17:33, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to E2E nude vidcaps
Talk:Microsoft Visual C Sharp

message: VC# is not the C# language, but the IDE to develop C# on Windows. Still the .NET SDK is a prerequisite to be able to develop with this IDE. I changed the beginning of the article because I feel it was confusing to the reader. Feel free to revert if I'm wrong. Hervegirod 10:41, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the language itself is called "visual c#".  This can be confirmed by running the command line compiler csc.exe - its signature line is "Microsoft Visual C#".  I'll  revert your changes. Leotohill 04:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Visual C# as an IDE

message: Particularly differences between VC# and C#. Thanks Jon 21:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no differences.  C# is the specification, VC# is the implementation by Microsoft. Leotohill (talk) 16:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please expand article

message: Is it valid to refer to the language as Visual C# and skip the Microsoft part? --Stefán Örvarr Sigmundsson 21:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As the article explains, almost any reference to "C#" means "Visual C#", so in most contexts there is no difference.  C# is the spec, Visual C# the primary implementation of the spec.  If someone comes up with a C# implementation that differs significantly from the specification (could they, and still call it C#?) then the article on that one could describe its differences. This article is meant to be short and sweet. Leotohill (talk) 01:46, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Shouldn't we be using the ♯ character instead of # in the article name?  I thought according to the language spec the character in the name was in fact a "musical sharp" and not a number sign (or "pound" sign).  Would this get around the technical restriction?  MetaFight (talk) 20:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name technical restriction 

message: Anybody thinking about merging this article into C#?Thomas J. S. Greenfield (talk) 09:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Dana Delany/Archive 2, Posting info on an artist's future schedule

message: Nothing makes a web page look dated more than references to things as occuring in the future when they've already taken place. Doesn't it make more sense to wait until they have actually occured, then putting them in the Wikipedia? This way corrections aren't intrinsically necessary. Besides, the wikipedia isn't for promotional purposes.Rphunt 04:13, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Posting info on an artist's future schedule

message: Interestingly, the Manual Of Style has a section on temporal references.x 16:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Temporal References
Talk:Morta of Lithuania

message: I believe that The semi-fossilized wood; The Goddess of Death  parts should be removed and instead should be made disambiguation.
:Done. Renata 18:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ASUKITE 17:59, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Morta (queen) →  – This will be a page name that will not only honor her status but will also distinguish her as there are few other historical figures as high ranking as Morta OnePurposeAccount2022 (talk) 11:48, 16 August 2022 (EET) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 10:10, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:10, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Biography has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 10:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 18 August 2022 
Talk:Smart Alec (comics)

message: This text was taken from http://alphanex.alphaflight.net/index.php/Smart_Alec without permission --Benjaminlwells 16:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the edit history on that site, it seems to have been added to the Alphanex article on April 12th 2006.  Wingsandsword added to this article back on March 1st 2006, though...? I know that some articles have been copied from Alphanex - they've been reverted to remove the copyvio - and I realise that the Alphanex edit history might not be an accurate picture of how long this text has been on that site... but at first glance, it looks like that copied Wikipedia, not the other way around...? Accordingly, I haven't reverted this article (yet). Might need a bit more thought about how best to proceed...? --Mrph 19:40, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, taking a look at this with the "Wayback Machine" , it does appear that a copyvio occurred. The offending text was on alphaflight.net before they converted to Wiki format and it predates the original posting to Wikipedia  (which was not by Wingsandsword, but by an anonymous editor ). The dates listed on the Alphanex Wiki are not useful for profiles created beforehand and later converted to Wiki. I don't see any choice here except to remove the copyvio text. --GentlemanGhost 03:28, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It really doesn't look right with just his birthplace though... Can we just paraphrase the text that was already there, or does someone need to look it up again from other sources? 24.136.11.242 04:44, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Paraphrasing isn't really the ideal solution. I was taught that paraphrasing someone else's work is still plagiarism. Moreover, it would rely on someone else's sentence structure, their accuracy in describing the source material, and their discernment as to what constitute the important details of this character. I think it would be better to base the article on the original comics themselves. --GentlemanGhost 19:39, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?