lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:PDA

message: * Protein Design Automation, a technology developed by Xencor for the design of protein biotherapeutics.(external link) User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:32, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional red links (sign if you add)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)  Vaticidalprophet 07:01, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: PDA (disambiguation) →  – I don't see a primary topic by either criteria. Personal digital assistant gets 11,768 views[] but Pathological demand avoidance gets 10,043, Patent ductus arteriosus gets 9,601, Pushdown automaton gets 8,075, Public display of affection gets 7,905, Party of Democratic Action gets 4,814, Alternative Democratic Pole gets 2,402 and PDA (The Office) gets 1,045 and there are more than just those[]. Given that PDA (The Office) gets over 10% of the views of Personal digital assistant its quite possible readers typing this term are more likely looking for The Office than Personal digital assistant since "PDA" is the name of that entity while its an acronym of the latter. The views also show that  gets 585 views and  gets 217 views but PDA (disambiguation) got 913 views and the DAB is only linked from the current primary topic and PD AeroSpace so it seems likely most readers are not landing where they want. Most Google results are for Pathological demand avoidance but none are for Personal digital assistant. Images mainly returns devices so it does seem like Personal digital assistant is primary there but Books appears to show more results for Pathological demand avoidance but none for Personal digital assistant. In the last RM it was noted to ask me in 10 years and now its been over 10 years. Crouch, Swale (talk)  22:20, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 7 May 2021
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/God complex

message: I think this is a topic worth discussing and studying further. I've had two recent experiences with people who seem to have severe God complexes of some sort. They seem to believe that they were put here to fulfill God's wish and will therefore not let ANYTHING or ANYONE interfere with their belief system, especially in regard to love for a woman. They almost detest it. They claim that it interferes with their love for God and their focus on God's plans for them. They also take the "everything happens for a reason" statement to a warped level and will find reasoning in everything and all the reasons usually revolve around them and their own belief system. It's very delusional. They are in many ways incapable of opening up to any other belief system or realities at all, that are not in direct correlation to their own. It's crazy, literally.
I was recently involved with someone. We had an intense "spiritual" connection, this I won't deny. He was a brilliant artist intent on using his artwork and good will to change the world. I respected this. Then, when he realized that he had "fallen in love" he turned away almost immediatly. Next thing you know it's, "I think we should just be friends because I love you."(what?) "And if I let myself go with you,(I guess he meant become intimate, attached and etc..etc...)my artwork will be DEAD." He claimed that he was incapable of doing both which is of course a self fulfilling prophecy. He believed that he couldn't fulfill his purpose on this earth through God and at the same time have a loving relationship, and do his artwork. His world turned upside down and he basically had some sort of mental/emotional breakdown. Within days, we went from one extreme to the next. Now he is a complete recluse and will not even meet with me to discuss anything because he says we're playing with "fire." This is of course the massively condensed version of what I'm trying to explain. The whole experience really freaked me out. 
As a matter of fact the first time we went on a date he looked at me and said, "Truthfully, I see you almost like the devil's advocate." 
I could write about this in much more depth but am at work right now an just happened across the site while doing some research on the topic.  12.166.105.138 20:57, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Danish Blue Cheese

message: This article is in sad need of wikify or repair or deletion. Admins get working.211.97.147.103
:Anyone is free to work on the mouldering article! ...en passant! 07:25, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is rubbish

message: At Angela's request, I have removed the earlier picture and added one of my own. The cheese was eaten shortly afterwards! Brookie: A collector of little round things 11:26, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture changed

message: :It is said that Danish Blue cheese is made by having copper wires passed through the cheese as it matures and also that the 'blueness' of Danish Blue is brought about by Penicillium roqueforti.
:There is, however, both truth and falsity in both assertions.
The article is not very clear on this: what does it mean by "both truth and falsity"? Does it use Penicillium roqueforti or not? bogdan 20:34, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not very clear 

message: The cited ref 3 says "The amendment indicates that the words ‘Danish Blue Cheese’ or translations thereof in all official
language versions may be included on the label, since ‘Danish Blue Cheese’ and ‘Danablu’ are
registered trademarks. The term ‘Danish Blue Cheese’ has always applied in all official language
varieties and is referred to in the various markets using the translation which applies in the
country concerned."
So if "Danish Blue Cheese" is the trademark, why are using "Danish Blue" as title?  In English book sources, Danish blue cheese is most often treated as generic.  See .  Is the terminology in places outside Europe regulated by the same rules as in the EU?  
And ref 1, danablu.dk, uses lowercase "Danish blue cheese". And the only other ref is just spam. Are there title conventions for cheeses that I need to know about?  What's the story here?  Dicklyon (talk) 21:08, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Title, trademark, case, etc.
Template talk:Vfdsock

message: I'm going to just propose this for now, even though this is only in use in one place. I think this could be widely useful if cleaned up significantly.
:Please note: Consensus will be reached by established Wikipedians. New users are encouraged to comment, though in order to prevent ballot stuffing by sockpuppets, votes from new users may be discounted. Anonymous votes from users who are not logged in will not be counted, though their comments will still be considered. Please see the guide to votes for deletion for more information.
I believe this wording (or something similar) will be more helpful and less offensive to new users, encouraging them to comment rather than just vote. If I don't get any negative feedback in the next half a day or so, I'll go ahead and update the template. —HorsePunchKid→龜 21:19, July 29, 2005 (UTC)
:I have gone ahead and updated the template as per this revision. —HorsePunchKid→龜 08:58, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed change
Talk:Chemical Agent Resistant Coating

message: I copied some of the text from  and , which comes from the US government, thus it is public domain, something their web sites confirm as well. Mr. Know-It-All 21:28, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:KP

message: * Kitchen Police, an informal term for military punitive duty involving menial food preparation such as peeling potatoes
** There is no article (or article section) containing this term to refer to; however, it is part of the definition found in Wiktionary Courtland 01:55, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
:See KP duty entry. Proofreader77 (talk) 15:42, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removals and reasons
Talk:Feeble-minded

message: I remember reading somewhere that the term "feeble-minded" also included so-called sexual "deviants."  Was this the case? 206.251.8.195 (talk) 20:19, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexual "Deviance" 

message: "Goddard was known for postulating most effectively that "feeble-mindedness" was a hereditary trait, most likely caused by a single recessive gene. This led Goddard to ring eugenic alarm bells in his 1912 work, The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble-Mindedness, about those in the population who carried the recessive trait despite outward appearances of normality."? Wardog (talk) 12:49, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, well, I think I meant U.S. states there, though in many countries similar practices occurred. The difficulty here though is that I'm not sure if anyplace else called it "feeble-mindedness", so I'm not sure if they really fall under the sentence. --Fastfission 22:57, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this passage trying to say? 

message: Isn't this seen as a pejorative term these days? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 09:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Pejorative Term
Talk:Sociology of architecture

message: It would be nice to have some examples of notables in the field who are not German.  Note that I translated this article from the de article.  Thanks in advance. -- MrBland 21:49, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable people?
Talk:Kansas City Royals

message: Author apparently has no idea what a bullpen is. In the section "1986–94: Staying in the picture" it states: "Though by the close of the 1989 season the team boasted a powerhouse bullpen in the AL Cy Young Award winner Bret Saberhagen (set franchise record with 23 wins in 1989), two time All-Star Mark Gubicza (15 game winner in 1989) and 1989 AL Rookie of the Year runner-up Tom Gordon (won 17 games in 1989),[3]"
All of the above were starting pitchers, not members of the bullpen (relief pitchers). How could no one have caught this by now? And could someone please fix this. I tried editing once or twice on wikipedia, and am a miserable failure at it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.70.157.181 (talk) 06:13, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bullpen 

message: The completion of the pine tar game was not part of a doubleheader.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.143.34.161 (talk) 12:08, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. EricEnfermero (Talk) 12:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pine Tar Game 

message: Can someone fix the Kansas City Royals roster template?-DANO- (talk) 04:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you be more specific? It looks ok to me right now. have you tried it on multiple devices? Grey Wanderer (talk) 17:22, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Site error 

message: There was a hurry to add Patrick Mahomes to the infobox as an owner today, per fan excitement and WP:NOTNEWS. But he's a minority owner with a presumably small stake, and listing him is misleading. For context, there's this list of part owners . Is there a reason not to list them all? John Sherman is the major owner. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:03, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for some much needed context. Grey Wanderer (talk) 03:03, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Kansas City Baseball Team. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 28#Kansas City Baseball Team until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm  Talk 13:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kansas City Baseball Team" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Presa Canario

message: "Wikipedia is not an advertising service. Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products; or articles created as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, may be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies. For more information, see Wikipedia:Spam."
:Signed and dated for archive purposes only. William Harris • (talk) • 10:23, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attn Sanders Kennels 

message: this claim is highly speculative and at least ought to marked as such: "The breed originated in ancient Rome during 43-89 AD,for example, dogs fought alongside the Romans and the British in the Roman Conquest of Britain."  it's not as though a firm chain of recording keeping for 2,000 years exists to substantiate this.  i'm not saying that this is not possible, but as a historical matter, it is at best conjecture.
:Signed and dated for archive purposes only. William Harris • (talk) • 10:23, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  history 

message: I need to say this, but since it's not in wikipedia rules I can't put in the article. Maybe someone can help me turn it into acceptable material.
A quick look at the list of attacks shows a fairly clear pattern - a few accidents happen. Then some people get a presa because it's "really dangerous and can kill people". Those people shouldn't own any dogs, leave alone a powerful guard breed. Then more accidents happen, more news coverage, more idiots attracted to the breed. 
A lot of the problems are not so much related to the breed (which *is* a tricky one) but to the wrong people being attracted to the breed.
All this is fairly well known... but how do I document this in a format that is not "my point of view" and put it in the article?
Most of the sources are fairly biased one way or another... either angel or demon. Hard to find something balanced to quote.
:Signed and dated for archive purposes only. William Harris • (talk) • 10:23, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Media Phenomenon vs Actual Breed Temperament 

message: I found a good quality image at wikimedia. I think it would be a better main image to this page. However, it is already used in the text. Adventurous36 (talk) 19:07, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main image 

message: Should this article note that two presa Canaria dogs killed Diane Whipple and the owners were charged with manslaughter? 71.246.222.105 (talk) 14:08, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death of diane Whipple
Talk:Helena Roerich

message: The article didn't say what she actually did for a living though it lists a number of "works".  Are these books, paintings, poems, what?  I put in the bit about her being a writer because that's what the "Letters..." would lead me to believe.  Dismas 22:07, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Les Oraliens

message: To the anonymous user, I noticed you changed the name of the mechanical dog character in that show. Is it based on your memory or something else ? I'm not implying your wrong (I'm pretty much working from memory on that article) but from what I remember, you might have confused it with the name of another quebec show: Iniminimagimo.--Marc pasquin 22:07, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Greenwich Mean Time/Time Cube

message: Should we request protection for this page? Or would that not be worth it? —Ashley Y 03:27, 2005 Apr 26 (UTC)
::Yes, please.  This vandalism has been going on for at least a year, with the tempo stepped up recently.  Thanks.  -- Dave C. 04:08, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have protected Greenwich Mean Time, Coordinated Universal Time, and Time zone due to an edit war over the insertion of comments relating to Time Cube. I am not familiar with the dispute, but I will carefully read this talk page and Time Cube in hopes of finding an agreement. — Knowledge Seeker দ 04:45, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection
Talk:Amherst College

message: It looks like the Amherst logo and seal need to be updated following a 2018 logo redesign. I have not made enough edits on Wikipedia yet to be allowed to upload images. Recommending that a power user who monitors this page update the seal and the wordmark. Source: https://www.amherst.edu/news/communications/visual-identity-toolkit  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lahiker (talk • contribs) 03:41, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New logo and seal 

message: I'm not sure how we selected the subset of notable alumni who are pictured in the main article (as opposed to the longer List of Amherst College people). An editor has noted that the alumni highlighted with pictures are all men, and all white except for one. 
The alumni described in the short paragraph would include additional notable black alumni (Charles Drew, Charles Hamilton Houston), but they aren't pictured.
It might be time to review the notable alumni, to include more recent alumni, to show pictures for a broader selection of notable alumni, and to identify some consistent criteria for the short list. Npdoty (talk) 13:39, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess the issue with these types of colleges is that, for most of their history, the student body was all male and almost entirely white. I looked through the list for women graduates (not a whole lot!) and suggest Sonya Clark and Aparna Nancheria. I support adding them, along with Drew and Houston, to the gallery. RegentsPark (comment) 14:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selection of notable alumni
Talk:Virtual Boy Wario Land

message: I have been asked this twice already, so I'm going to go ahead and just put the logic here for future reference. 
# The box says Virtual Boy Wario Land
# The cartridge says Virtual Boy Wario Land
# The title screen says Virtual Boy Wario Land
# GameFAQs, MobyGames, GameSpot, and Planet Virtual Boy all refer to it as Virtual Boy Wario Land.
# Note how it never says "Wario Land for Virtual Boy". The "Virtual Boy" is part of the subtitle of the game, much like how Eternal Darkness' full title is actually Eternal Darkness: Sanity's Requiem. 
# Most importantly: It's really just a rearangement of words from "Wario Land (Virtual Boy)", so what does it really matter? This way drops the parentheses and looks better.
SeizureDog 06:37, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why the title is "Virtual Boy Wario Land" and not "Wario Land (Virtual Boy)"

message: I was the only kid on my block that owned a virtual boy and this game, the tennis game, and some space themed shooter were the only ones worth owning on this system. However i think this was Either the best selling game for the virtual boy or the most well received by critics. That would be worth a mention in the article imo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.88.34.81 (talk) 20:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Best title on the Virtual Boy?

message: http://retro.ign.com/articles/845/845487p1.html
http://www.mobygames.com/game/virtual-boy/virtual-boy-wario-land
http://nindb.classicgaming.gamespy.com/vue-vwc.shtml
http://www.themushroomkingdom.net/games/vbwl  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Judgesurreal777 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Useful links

message: It seems like the Nintendo Power rating was copied to Wikipedia wrong. The way it's written in the magazine is actually a bit odd: the magazine has a table labeled "Power Meter Ratings" and each game is listed under 4 categories.
https://archive.org/stream/Nintendo_Power_Issue001-Issue127/Nintendo%20Power%20Issue%20079%20December%201995#page/n111/mode/2up
Here are the "Power Meter Ratings" for Virtual Boy Wario Land:
G  	P  	C  	T
4.4	3.8	4.4	4.3
I have no idea what the letters represent, but it looks like each number is out of 5, so should the rating at least be changed to out of 20 (16.9/20) if not removed completely?
CubeBag (talk) 22:39, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Letters stand for "Graphics", "Playability", "Control", and "Total", I believe. The last number should be used, not added with the other numbers. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 22:50, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed! Roberth Martinez (talk) 23:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Just as a follow-up, I've removed it from the reviews infobox. Per WP:STICKTOSOURCE we shouldn't interpret these ratings and averaging it. It gives the impression that publications (in this case Nintendo Power) gave it an overall rating. While they would later give overall marks, in this case, they did not. Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird game rating "16.9/10" from Nintendo Power
Talk:Muscle contraction

message: I have a problem with statements such as:
"In concentric contraction, muscle tension is sufficient to overcome the load, and the muscle shortens as it contracts.[8] This occurs when the force generated by the muscle exceeds the load opposing its contraction."
Newton's third law requires that the muscle tension and its load, possibly including inertial loads, be equal.  It is the muscle ability to generate force while isometric that exceeds the load in a concentric contraction and is exceeded by it in an eccentric contraction.  
I am new here so reluctant to just change it.  Advice appreciated.
Thanks,
David Morgan
Drdrdlm (talk) 11:34, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your interest. If you're uncertain, a good first strep would be to rephrase that sentence and propose it as a substitute. Have source(s) ready (see WP:RS and WP:V). Other editors may provide additional input. If no one objects, then be bold (see WP:BOLD) and make the appropriate changes. Hope this helps. danielkueh (talk) 11:52, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newtons third law 

message: What is the citation for the paper saying that the temporal summation of 30,000 Ca++ ions is what causes the intracellular calcium increase. Obviously more Ca would cause a higher concentration, but where does the number 30,000 come from
Pumwi23 (talk) 03:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cardiac Muscle 

message: — Assignment last updated by Smbiophysics (talk) 16:40, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: BYU-Biophysics, CELL 568
Talk:World Peace Bell (Newport, Kentucky)

message: I've replaced the expansion tag. It was removed once before, the the article wasn't really expanded. There could be a few more sections added, such as a history section, current information, and maybe a gallery, etc., etc. I don't have time to do all this, but I'm familiar enough with the bell to know this article could stand some improvements. Veracious Rey talk • contribs • review 13:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion tag 

message: * "The bell is only swung on special occasions." -- The Newport, KY website says "swings daily at
noon in honor of world peace."  Can anyone confirm that the bell is (or is not) rung regularly?
* I changed the article to read "was swung for the first time" (instead of "rang for the first time"), as the bell had been rung, probably many hundreds of times, by visitors on the barge that carried it up the Mississippi. This was achieved with a smaller, externally mounted and electronically controlled clapper mechanism  that was part of the barge installation. They even had a big red button, and I pushed it!
--Ninly 05:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Those are some good edits to make the article more accurate.  I believe the bell does get swung daily to ring it.  It never gets a full circle ring; only about a quarter turn ring.Mfields1 01:24, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A couple problems 

message: I cut out ref to bell in NZ and found there are 20+ world wide. It and the organisation might be worth articles; first was in Japan so worth the ref.
Now less like an essay padded to a target number of words.  I can't quite square what article says about casting and its supervision with what a linked foundry's site says.--SilasW (talk) 13:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewriting
Talk:Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (comic book)

message: The proposed move is not uncontroversial although it appears it is presumed to be by the proposer and is opposed. This current redirect is functional, as the page it directs to is in its proper title by naming convention, WP:NCC. MURGH talk 03:35, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed move