lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tango (disambiguation)

message: ---
I have read and heard that tango argentino is used throughout the world in management training, marriage counselling, boarding schools specialising in music etc. Can anyone provide specific examples?
----
I was surprised to read that Tango was code for Terrorist, but when I followed the link there was no mention of this on the linked Terrorism page. Can someone provide some source for this, or further information?
- jtauber
*Google is your best friend.  See this SWAT lingo. mikka (t) 01:04, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: This page has ballooned a bit like most DAB pages do over time.  I'm pruning it down in line with Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages):
*Removing all information not needed for disambiguation
*Un-linking all words that do not disambiguate Tango
*Removing final punctuation from dab list items
*Removed Tangos - anyone trying to link specifically to Tangos as opposed to Tango would not make the mistake of linking Tango. And Tango (dance) links to Tangos anyway
*Removed Tango - code word in Tom Clancy fiction link as it was a self-link to this same page
*Removed  'T' in phonetic alphabet link as there is no relevant article nor will there ever likely be an article for specific code words in the NATO phonetic alphabet. Nor do I expect to find any articles linking that meaning though if I find any during disambiguation I'll replace it
I'm about to disambiguate all the Tango links and I may make more changes after I see where all the links are pointing. If anyone disagrees with any of my deletions, feel free to restore but please leave a note here explaining why.
Many thanks, ~ Veledan • Talk 21:40, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tidying page 

message: I think this page whould be moved to Tango (disambiguation), and changed to a redirect to Tango music, which is actually the name source of (I think) all the things listed here. Mariano(t/c) 06:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Propose

message: It seems that there are too many tango entries going around: Tango (dance), Argentine Tango, Tango music and History of Tango have a lot of overlap and not enough clear distinction between them. None of them seem to be the main historical/chronological article that one would expect, and they are still weighed by the subjective knowledge of the writers in each article, without any reference whatsoever to the standard bibliography. --BlopaGotan (talk) 03:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Consolidate and organize

message: I added an external reference in the slang entry. Please check. Mariostorti (talk) 16:19, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tango entry in Slang 

message: See title. If questions/objections, put here. —70.105.18.120 (talk) 17:17, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged ICAO and NATO definition 

message: This article is a disambiguation page, so shouldn't be called Tango (disambiguation)? Halloleo (talk) 10:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: The usage of Tango is under discussion, see Talk:Tango (dance) -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 01:43, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tango
Talk:Cheryl Ford

message: Delete because:
# No meaningful content or history (eg "sdhgdf"). 
AND
# Test pages (eg "Can I really create a page here?").
OR
# Pure vandalism (see dealing with vandalism).
ZeroFuzion 13:46, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gender Recognition Act 2004

message: In the 'updates' section of this article, there does not appear to be anything about the current Women and Equalities Committee Inquiry. Would it be objectionable for me to include a short paragraph on this new parliamentary action? Miscellieneous (talk) 09:57, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women and Equalities Committee Inquiry October 2020
Talk:Velocette

message: In the course of copyediting, I discovered a discrepency.  In 1921, the Veloce still has no clutch.  In 1922, the clutch is introduced, and it is similar to the "previous clutch."  Huh?  Was there a clutch or wasn't there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dickumbrage (talk • contribs) 15:43, 1 July 2004
"Last clutch" does not mean "previous clutch", but the last Velocette clutch (circa 1967).Seasalt 13:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Clutch

message: The timeline is a straight lift from the external website mentioned and as such needs a lot of work, if only to turn it into good english. GraemeLeggett 12:27, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This needs to be rewritten and incorporated into the history section, and the entire article could use some expansion.  There's a little more information at John Taylor (Velocette) that could be incorporated here.  — Catherine\talk 15:30, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy needs edit 

message: Timeline contains a reference to the discontinuation of the Valiant, but no date for its production start. The article does contain any detail of its specification.
--Bobirving (talk) 00:11, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Valiant
Talk:Tudor

message: This should surely be a disambiguation page. Rich Farmbrough 16:00, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No direct link, but 'Tudor' is a christian name in both Wales and Romania (originally spelt 'Tewdr' in Wales before the spelling was Anglicised to 'Tudor'). It evolved independantly in each country as an equivalent of 'Theodor'. Due to evolving Welsh naming conventions in the middle ages (that a son of a man called Tudor might be referred to as '(forename) ap Tudor' i.e '(forename), son of Tudor' and this being misundersood by the English as a surname) it migrated over in Wales to become a surname.  Hence the Tudor dynasty.Indisciplined (talk) 19:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, i would like to bring your attention on the link : Tudor (watch), a brand of Rolex watches. Indeed, there is now a fully dedicated wikipedia page for Tudor Watches. For this reason, I would like to know if it is possible to make the update so the link redirects to the Tudor Page and not the Rolex Page.
Datawords_17 (talk)
(talk) 19:12, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Tudor (watch) Reference
Talk:Larkhall

message: Please can we stop adding in stuff about the locals hating Hamilton, hating Celtic supporters and any other opinions you may have about Larkhall.  This in an encyclopaedia, just add the facts and keep it objective. --82.40.48.51 10:34, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Page on The Indepenent about the local aversion to green and its connotations - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/scottish-town-where-green-is-beyond-the-pale-981747.html. If I had the time, I'd update the article, maybe adding a section regarding local opinion and sectarianism, referencing that, and multiple other news sites readily available. It's not like there's a shortage of them. So while it may not be particularly nice, Larkhall's ingrained sectarian streak is still a fact. Hakikev (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:31, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

text: user:Tip2tail and anon editors have removed coverage of this.   However, there are multiple press reports in WP:RS of the aversion to green, e.g. Independent, Herald, Scotsman. It seems to me that this is therefore sufficiently notable to be covered here. – Fayenatic London 16:03, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Sectarian?
Talk:Avalanche effect

message: How about a mention of chaos theory/butterfly effect? It is all about big changes from little variations, which is exactly what avalanche effects are. Synetech (talk) 01:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chaos Theory 

message: I removed this

as it displays (as I observe it) an incredibly annoying animation that distracts me in attempting to read the article. While it describes the concept of the article reasonably well, I don't think it can stay on the page when a person without disabilities can't read the text without disabling it. Eroen (talk) 09:43, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: So now animated gifs are allowed to be removed on the grounds that they are "annoying"? --Simpsons contributor (talk) 10:09, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know the policy in detail, but removed it under WP:BB, with a listing here. The main reason was unreadability of the text. A better solution might be something one could click on to make the thing start and stop the fancy flashing patterns, but I'm not sure how to accomplish that. Did you strongly feel it needed to be there to make the article informative? Eroen (talk) 13:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

text:  Animated gifs make sense when used to illustrate a process. E.g. the animated gif on the linear feedback shift register page is helpful to understand how the states of an LFSR are computed. Here, however, I agree with Eroen. There is no inherent time dimension that justifies an animation. The text explaining that a small change in the input results in a large change in the output and the simple example using SHA-1 are more concise and simpler to follow. Therefore, I also think that the animated gif is more a distraction than adding value to the page. 178.195.230.127 (talk) 13:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Annoying gif
Talk:Plankowner

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion July 1 to July 7 2004, consensus was not reached.  Discussion:
Dicdef.  Joyous 16:11, Jul 1, 2004 (UTC)
*Isn't in my dictionary. Neologism? or just an Americanism? Delete either way. Google search on the term seems to indicate it means something more along the lines of owner-captain or even owner-crewman that as written. SkArcher 17:03, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Old discussions

message: The following information was removed from the article based on "Plank-owner certificates are procured by and issued to crew members of the ship being commissioned; they are not officially issued by the Navy" 
In lieu of an actual "plank" from the deck of a newly commissioned ship (these being pretty hard to come by in this day and age) crew members are presented with a Plank Owner Certificate commemorating their unique status of being part of the Original Crew when the ship became part of the U. S. Navy.
If additional citations can be found, please re-add the information and cite it properly. — MrDolomite • Talk 18:39, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of certificate text
Talk:Testsuko Kuroyanagi

message: Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion July 1 to July 7 2004, article was redirected.  Discussion:
Sorry!  I wrote the initial content of the article and I mispelled her name!
It's Tetsuko Kuroyanagi - not "Test" 
All the content has been moved to the new location with the proper spelling.
*I have redirected one to the other, which is what you should have done in the first place rather than listing it here. -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 17:23, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Bud Adams

message: Adams' seeming obsession with the "Oilers" name and his determination to keep anyone else from getting the rights to it is interesting.  Perhaps it is his own petroleum background.  A lot of his pride was tied up in the name, and it is very likely that he would have left it on the team if they had been doing anything like the amount of business that they needed to remain viable in Tennessee.  In its defense, there are several producing oil wells in Tennessee, largely well to the east of Nashville, although hardly comparable to the oil fields of Texas.  As several wags pointed out, there's lot more oil in Tennessee than there ever has been lakes in Los Angeles, or jazz in Utah.
:They should have kept the "Tennessee Oilers" moniker and then changed their fight song to the theme song of the "Beverly Hillbillies." They were, after all, Tennessee oilers. 72.148.45.37 (talk) 15:00, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Oil

message: I noticed that this is now a redlink in the article.  Are there good chances that this will become a viable list/category, or is this better deleted? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.88.1.62 (talk) 21:23, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "NFL rejects" 
Talk:Pineapple

message: I'd like to see a more detailed description of the flower and the fruit in this article. Because when you see the pineapple flower and the fruit they are mostly the same. I can see that they differ in color, size and shape, but I cannot see the little "berry" in the fruit mentioned in the article (I only see the yellow part of the pineapple fruit), nor I can see the ovaries, petals, sepals in the flower. Would someone upload a more detailed pic regarding the anatomy of the flower and the fruit pointing these parts? I'd be greatly appreciated. 2800:810:453:8CBC:81E6:7A2F:7486:8C3D (talk) 22:48, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Pineapple is classified as a syncarpous multiple fruit. The ovaries of multiple flowers on a single inflorescence fuse together as they mature, forming a single fruit Farmerbylastname (talk) 13:10, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anatomy of the Flower, Fruit and seeds 

message: Typo:
"stable" to "staple" 98.37.150.154 (talk) 15:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 August 2022 

message: The recent discovery of a painting in Pompeii which appears to show an early form of the pizza also shows fruit, two of which look like pineapples. 
I would therefore question the validity of the date proposed for its introduction to Europe. 2A00:23C5:D003:C01:40A3:3D2F:1285:90D (talk) 17:24, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No while the particular mural seems to have only received attention recently, the general issue has been discussed many times before, see   Nil Einne (talk) 14:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

text: I've seen silly theories, but this one takes the cake. Viriditas (talk) 22:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of introduction to Europe
Talk:Sajida Talfah

message: "Sajida Chairallah Talfah was the first wife ... ". Why the past tense ? Jay 17:59, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Was the wife?

message: No mention of her participation in the Family Business?  This woman had her enemies murdered by torture without compunction just like her husband, her sons, and the rest of that rotten bunch.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.161.42.199 (talk) 23:23, 24 April 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any proof of that? Sandy June 19:46, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Family business

message: Her name is actually Sajidah Khairallah Tilfah Hussein, according to CNN. July 2nd story. Should the article name be changed? --OrbitOne  [Talk|Babel] 18:00, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sajidah Khairallah Tilfah Hussein 

message: Sajida and Saddam separated in the 80's, and I'm sure that they divorced. Should that be mentioned? --Cao Wei 02:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Is/was

message: I have found some better, clearer pictures of Sajida Talfah. I'm not really good at changing the photos while editing pages (I have tried) but maybe someone else will.
Picture #1   http://wwwimage.cbsnews.com/images/2003/04/14/image549375g.jpg
Picture # 2   http://img.thesun.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00431/snn0719b384_431824a.jpg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.30.96.160 (talk) 05:52, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for a better picture

message: there are many pictures of just her, and you can make it out much better than the current picture.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.31.111.16 (talk) 18:30, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs new picture! 

message: It seems a bit unusual to mention in the intro paragraph the name of the actress who played this (real) person in a TV series. Imagine someone did that, e.g., to the article about Hitler.
Could this be reorganized, so the mention of the actress appears later?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.195.229.117 (talk) 23:02, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of House of Saddam in the intro paragraph 
Talk:Urban district (England and Wales)

message: Before I launch into an edit, I'd better point out what I propose to do
"Urban Districts" no longer exist. The article does point this out, but the introduction should be in the past tense!
The pre-1974 system was as follows
Top Level - County 
2nd Level - County Borough (effectively with the same powers as a County)
          - Metropolitan Borough (more limied powers)
          - Urban District (even more limited)
          - Rural District (fewer powers still)
So, an Urban District was an urban area not large enough to merit County Borough or Metropolitan Borough status. Generally they had a population of less than 30,000, though some were much larger. In fact, the division between Metropolitan Boroughs and Urban Districts was based on historical factors (the Metropolitan Boroughs being in general older).
Examples.
In South Lancashire
- Warrington - County Boroough
- Widnes - Metropolitan Borough
- Newton-le-Willows - Urban District
I shall say something about the origins of Urban Districts (which arose from Local Boards and Sanitary Districts in the 19th Century)
Exile
:I think you mean municipal borough rather than metropolitan borough which are something entirely different. G-Man 20:05, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I imagine the "globalize" flag has arisen because the simple term urban district means a district (world-wide) that is urban.  Perhaps it should be moved to "Urban district (British subdivision)", with a disambiguation.  But I'm not sure how often people search the phrase looking for any other meaning. . . .LinguisticDemographer 21:31, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just wonder why the title was changed in the first place? Surely, if we are talking about Great Britain as having them - and no others are mentioned - then it would have been better to have left the whole three words? I realise that the Council was a meeting, but more often that not the area was regarded as a UDC. But I would accept the term used above but with a capital letter for District, since we don't want to drag in all those others - which will be pretty diffuse in their ways of working anyway: see how many parts of the world are contained in the box!! Peter Shearan (talk) 13:43, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Context
Talk:Nightgown

message: On the Nightie page that was merged into this one, there was this line:
Indian nighties are different from others 
But i can't find any information on how Indian nightgowns are different, and they don't seem to actually be any different. Anyone out there know anything about this? Pyrop 18:33, Jul 1, 2004 (UTC)
: Since, I started the Nightie page, I'd say still Indian Nightie is different--they're not sleeveless (usually) and not short as it's claimed in the current page. I still couldn't find via Google though here are some commercial pages   --Rrjanbiah (talk) 10:14, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Shortie nightgown article does not present sufficient information to stand on its own.  It should be merged into this article. Neelix (talk) 00:35, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Shortie nightgown]] 

message: What about that long hat that some people wear with their nightgowns? Mdriver1981 (talk) 05:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hat 
Category talk:Homosexuality

message: The following discussion comes from Wikipedia:Categories for deletion. The consensus was that it is no longer needed, as :Category:LGBT is being used instead. Since this category may be used accidentally in the future, I decided to make it a redirect instead of deleting it. -Aranel ("Sarah") 23:53, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  CfD discussion 

message: Instead of labeling things as "homosexual", "gay", "lesbian", or "bisexual", I've been reclassifying sexual orientation-related topics under "identity", "science", "society", etc.  See :Category:LGBT.  Some of the categories there could probably stand to be re-named (feel free to make additional nominations), but for the moment, I've finished reclassifying everything from Category:Homosexuality, so it's no longer needed.  (This was announced on and supported by Category talk:LGBT.)
*Support. --Spinboy 17:25, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Homosexuality]]
Talk:Habit (disambiguation)

message: I don't mind that some psychologists use the word habituation in the way they do. I do mind that the behavioral phenomenon of habit is hardly mentioned in Wikipedia and that any reference to habit gets redirect to this disambiguation page which doesn't offer a choice to the reader that is more proximate to their likely interests. I know that popular terms are very ambiguous, but the term habit certainly meant something serious to William James. And yet the word habit gets NO mention in that article and a single off-handed mention in the article on his famous The Principles of Psychology. I think this is why pop-psych is so successful: the psychologists don't like to deal with concepts that people can grasp. DCDuring 01:30, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hijacking the Word "Habit" into "Habituation"
Talk:Evaporative cooling

message: I think the article on Swamp cooler can be merged under this article if there aren't any objections. See: Talk:Swamp cooler Buster 19:13, Jul 1, 2004 (UTC)
:Objection lodged on Talk:Swamp cooler.  Discuss it there. --Abqwildcat 21:24, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: This article refers to helium-3 evaporative cooling.  The link goes to the isotope helium-3.  If I am not mistaken, however, it is helium(III), a unique PHASE of helium, as opposed to helium-3, an ISOTOPE of helium, that is used in these exotic cooling applications.  Does this ring true with anyone? Dr U 01:37, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is certainly Helium (II), (III) etc, but I wonder if the reason they use Helium-3 is because it doesn't form Bose Einstein condensates, and thus can be cooled much further than He 4?  (IANAP).  Perhaps you can find some references. njh 03:59, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: that doesn't sound right either, because this work was early to mid 20th century, but noone succeded in making a bose-einsten condensate until the mid 1990's.  i'll continue to search for references. Dr U 12:58, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very true! njh 22:25, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Helium III
Talk:Old Finland

message: the last revert was not highly recommendable.
I cannot fathom why Wikipedia must say, incorrectly, that ceded territories were around Kymi River, since they factually were precisely east of Kymi river. Etc.
213.243.157.114 19:48, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: * baron Johannes Baltasar von Campenhausen, in 1743
* prince Juri Nikitich Repnin, at least in 1744 (b 1701, d 1744)
* Afanasi Isakov, 1745-1752, 1754-1766
* Johannes Kristof von Keyserlingk, 1752-54
* baron Niklas Henrikki von Engelhardt, 1766-1778, son of Niklas Frederik Englert
* Eugen von Kaschkin (Evgeni Petrovich), 1778-1780
* Piotr Alexeievich Stupishin, 1780-1782
* prince Frederick of Wurttemberg, 1782-1786
* count James Bruce, 1787-1791
* Vilhelm Henrikki von Engelhardt, 1782-1785, civil governor, son of Kasperi Engelhardt
* Aleksanteri Maunu von Peutling, 1785 civil governor
* Kaarle Johannes von Güntzel, 1785-1793 civil governor
* prince Fedor Pavlovich Sherbatov, 1793-1797
* marshal Mikhail Kamenski
* general Kasimir von Meyendorp, at least in 1802
*  Kaarle Maunu von Rüdiger, 1797-1799 civil governor
*  Piotr Vasilievich Zheltukhin, 1799 civil governor
* Maunu Orraeus (deputy civil governor 1797-) 1799-1804 civil governor
* Nikolaus von Emine, Nikolai Fedorovits 1804-1808 civil governor
*  Ivan Jakovlevich Bukharin, 1808-1811 civil governor
*  Johannes Winter, 1811 civil governor
* ? count Frederik Vilhelm Buxhoeveden, 1808
* Kaarle Johannes Stjernvall, at least in 1811
88.195.126.19 (talk) 10:35, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  some governors and governors-general of Old Finland
Talk:Sania Mirza

message: Why is her ITF title numbers missing? Ishan87 (talk) 15:44, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her titles