Talk:Little Miss Jocelyn

message: Oh dear...does this show really merit a page on Wikipedia?.  I've seen two episodes now, and this show must really represent a new low in British comedy.  No amount of canned laughter rescues it.  At least when Lenny Henry did black stereotypes they were credible, likeable and funny. 160.84.253.241 10:26, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whether or not a television show warrants an article doesn't depend on popularity of the show, it depends on how notable it is.  It's in the same league as Tittybangbang.  talk to JD wants e-mail 10:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe, perhaps the show would be funny if we weren't paying for it.  I think that the wikipage should be written later, after the show either completes its run or is axed mid-series - whichever happens soonest. 160.84.253.241 11:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

text: This show makes me laugh too, although, I guess British comedy has gone downhill. But we can always watch the classics such as 'Only Fools and Horses' on UKTV and on VHS/DVD. Whoever wrote this article certainly knew the information accurately, I think it's only fair that we let it stay, it can't do any harm. JJMan 07:50, 08 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "Whoever wrote this article certainly knew the information accurately".  Well I think that most 'meeja' articles are written (and very closely monitored) by the 'meeja' types that work for the company, so they will 'know the information'.  Just try putting a critical comment into the article and see how quickly the article reverts to saying that the show is the most screamingly-hilarious comedy classic of all time. 160.84.253.241 07:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing like that can be put in the article, and nothing like that is in the article at the moment.  Wikipedia has a neutral point of view policy.  J Ditalk 07:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

text: I don't see the problem with this article. All the information seems to be correct and it is just stating basic facts about the show. Like all forms of entertainment, not everyone is going to like this show, but not everyone will dislike it either. Keeping within Wikipedia's NPOV policy, whether this show is to anyone's personal taste or not shouldn't determine whether it meritsit's own Wikipedia page. I don't see why the page cannot be written until the series has ended either. Any new information that comes out about the show, including whether it completes its run, is axed or recommisioned, can be added when that information is released. PCM22:01, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it dark up there? 160.84.253.241 07:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Characters section of this article, like the rest of the article, had no references.  So it appears that it's all Original Research.  SO I removed it. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 16:16, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Little Miss Jocelyn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080811220912/http://www.rednoseday.com/whats-on/walk-this-way/ to http://www.rednoseday.com/whats-on/walk-this-way/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified