lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peter Anderson (artist)

message: Peter Anderson is the older sibling of Water Inglis Anderson. He was also an owner of Shearwater Pottery. I plan on doing futher research since information on this person seems to be not available. I believe Wikipedia would be an excellent location to have information on this artist. He is also a local artist from my area, Ocean Springs. Userjack6880 18:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I started this page a bunch of years ago, and intended on doing more research before better resources were available, and ended up mostly abandoning it. I really appreciate that somebody came in and rescued it with better references that are no longer dead links.
--Userjack6880 (talk) 16:57, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks for Preventing Deletion
Talk:San Fernando, Pampanga

message: I was just wondering why no account on the many hospitals and clinics that are situated in the city. The Rural Health Units, comparable to private clinics now totaling five with RHU 5 recently opened, with a corresponding Lying-in clinic the 3rd in the city. Aside from the government operated Jose B Lingad and Rodriguez, we have Makabali, Mother Teresa of Calcutta, Mt. Carmel and San Fernandino. Private clinics also proliferates thus the city is a haven for medical concerns having the best doctors in all fields.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.210.152.166 (talk) 22:49, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data on hospitals in the City of San Fernando 

message: I couldn't see any wikipedia reference to the Balog-Balog Irrigation Multipurpose Project, I don't know if it should be an article in it's own right but it looks like it affects this city and the surrounding area - so I thought I'd paste a link with the info I saw 
EdwardLane (talk) 15:02, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  BIMP 

message: I have an inquiry of the first Mayor of San Fernando, Simon Garcia? I am a relative descendant of Mr. Garcia. I do not see his name under the list of officials. Do you have information on the first Mayor of San Fernando? - Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.211.211.91 (talk) 09:56, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  first Mayor of San Fernando, Simon Garcia 
Talk:Lovie Austin

message: Born Cora Calhoun in Chattanooga, Tennessee, she studied music theory at Roger Williams University and Knoxville College in Nashville, Tennessee.
Roger Williams seems to have started in the 1950s, although a preceding institution dates to 1919.  I tend to be suspicious of references to books withiut online links.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.195.108.189 (talk) 17:52, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the link is wrong. Compare with Roger Williams University. 5lkdl (talk) 15:55, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly bogus citation 

message: Hey there,
I‘ve got a question about Lovie‘s sisters and brothers: Were they really nine children (“she had eight brothers and sisters“) in total? The source refers to geni.com page that only mentions a Lovie Balance. Parents were a certain William Austin (which can‘t really be, since she was née Calhoun/Taylor) and his wife Mogieannah. Researchers Eagle/LeBlanc suggest a Lillie Taylor as her mother; findagrave.com gives a certain Arthur Calhoun as her father‘s name. 
I think the source of Eagle/LeBlanc is true. What do you think? All the best --5lkdl (talk) 18:58, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eight brothers and sisters?
Talk:Contraindication

message: Why the change from an encyclopedic voice to the direct quote from page 70 of http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/98fr/06-545.pdf ? I understand the need to cite sources and have references, but this information could have been inserted without completely overwriting the work of previous Wikipedians. BonsaiViking 18:26, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopedic voice lost?

message: An article should never claim that something should or should not occur. This is obvious bias.
"baby with a fever should never be given aspirin because of the risk of Reye's syndrome, and a person with an anaphylactic food allergy should never eat that food" etc needs to be reworked to reflect what the sources claim, by quoting them, or mentioning thier claims, not by directly adopting their position. 219.73.89.163 (talk) 09:25, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: Then what is general contraindication? 2407:C00:6004:8DC3:1841:9E12:98BA:4731 (talk) 04:21, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  General contraindication
Talk:Guggenheim Aeronautical Laboratory

message: It would seem like someone at Caltech would have great access to primary sources for this topic. Any volunteers? Sdsds 18:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help at Caltech 

message: The most noteworthy characteristic of GALCIT was that it was the first academic institution (in the U.S., at least, possibly in the world) to do research on rockets. Other research done at that time (e.g. Goddard, or NACA) wasn't being done in association with a research university. Is there some source to cite that says this about GALCIT? Sdsds 23:19, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Found one, and incorporated it into the lead (Sdsds - Talk) 08:02, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for noteworthy characteristic 

message: Both the Jack Parsons biographies have a lot in them on his time at GALCIT too. You can access Strange Angel at Google Books  and you can search inside both of them at Amazon.com. That should open up most of the specific content you might be looking for but feel free to give me a nudge if there is anything specific you want tracking down as I have both books. (Emperor (talk) 20:44, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Jack Parsons]] 
Talk:Doubles

message: This page was marked for cleanup per MoS:DAB. I removed the following entries because they either didn't include a link to a main article where I could check, or because they sounded rather non-notable (e.g. they weren't even mentioned on the linked-to article) and WP:OR. Unfortunately, they were also not enough to-the-point to be copied to wiktionary. Please re-include them if you have a link to a wiki article that mentions/explains them, but strip off unnecessary detail from the dab entry then please. If you have more knowledge about this topic, you may also transfer these meanings to wikt:doubles.
*Doubles conventionally offer a standardised method of breaking down stereotype gender divisions in sporting contests. Note the existence (in tennis, say) of men's doubles, women's doubles and mixed doubles
*Doubles or partnerships have unique psychological dynamics as they fit neither into standard team sports nor into individual sports categories. This offers particular challenges in coaching
*Doubles also refers to a mode of play in the video game Dance Dance Revolution, where one player uses both pads on the machine to play. Though the technical term for this mode is "Double Play", the colloquial term among players is "doubles"
I created a new page for Doubles (bells) though because that topic sounded promising for a full article. – sgeureka t•c 18:33, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Christianity in the Philippines

message: A discussion is taking place here which concerns some content of this article. Interested editors are invited to join the discussion. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:07, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion concerning content in this article 

message: Hi,
I noticed that most of the content are related to Catholicism and not Christianity. Is it possible to rename this article?
elivic (talk) 02:55, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christianity or Catholicism? 
Talk:The Last Kiss (2001 film)

message: Besides the imdb claim, can anyone find any citations to verify the film was ever known as "One Last Kiss" in the USA?  It looks to me like someone might have goobered the translation in some American media source, and later someone ran with it and posted it on imdb, and then it got carried over here.  Maybe a hard copy film reference can back this title up, but superficially this looks like an innocent mistake we shouldn't perpetuate.  imdb is good, but it isn't perfect. Townlake (talk) 17:05, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  USA title
Talk:Filippiada

message: Kokolakis provides a detailed history on the foundation of Filipiada (whis is not part of Chameria):
. The text should be changed accordingly.Alexikoua (talk) 04:11, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I found this part in the text but I think that this merging effectively took place before 1913. Kokolakis doesn't mention a specific date.--Maleschreiber (talk) 00:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You're adding text that's not supported by the source: "Modern Filippiada was founded in 1880-81". Please be careful and in case you have difficulty translating from Greek it would be better to open a tp topic first.Alexikoua (talk) 03:40, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yet another wp:OR falsely interpreting Baltsiotis who reads: "Οι μουσουλμάνοι αυτοί μετακινήθηκαν το 1881 στη Νέα Φιλιππιάδα. Έτσι, ελληνόφωνους αναφέρει τους μουσουλμάνους της (Ν.) Φιλιππιάδας ο Ν.Η. Αναγνωστόπουλος, γράφοντας μάλιστα και αυτός ότι προέρχονται από τους μετακινηθέντες από την Άρτα το 1881.146 Ο F. Rrapaj για το 1926 αναφέρει 200 μουσουλμανικά αλβανικά «σπίτια» και δύο χριστιανικά,147 επιβεβαιώνοντας την πληροφορία ότι ο πληθυσμός προέρχεται από την Άρτα."...Baltsiotis simply presents two contradicting accounts though in page 29 he simply states that the population came initially from Arta. Anything else is clear speculation which the author doesn't accept.Alexikoua (talk) 05:53, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Baltsiotis presents two views one from a Greek author and the other from an Albanian author. The first one considers all Muslims to have been Greek-speakers, while the second considered them all to be Albanians. Neither view is accurate and both argue for a monolingual narrative. This is evident throughout the work. Baltsiotis discusses the existence of an Albanian school in Filippiada (p.85), the existence of an Albanian club and in 1928, the remaining Muslims were Albanian-speaking, Greek-speaking and Romani-speaking (p.117). This is what the article discusses and it's not WP:OR.--Maleschreiber (talk) 16:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Baltsiotis also states that any Albanian national initiative after 1913 was completely insignificant. the existence of an Albanian club and in 1928 can you provide a quote from that? No Albanian clubs existed after 1913.Alexikoua (talk) 20:03, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Kokolakis
Talk:Lotka's law

message: There is something wrong with the logic behind this table. If you multiple it out you have 238 articles as 
(10 x 1 + 9 x 1 + 8 x 2 + 7 x 2 + 6 x 3 + 5 x 4 + 4 x 3 + 3 x 11 + 2 x 25 + 1 x 45) = 238
and 100 writers. So the average here is 2.4 articles per writer not 1 article per writer as claimed 
(this is not true you are assuming that the writers are independent or unique. no where in the article was that claim made)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.36.40.162 (talk) 10:16, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

message: Hi, in the plotted curve, isn't it for C=100, n=2? It says C=1, n=2 --S.POROY (talk) 18:46, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The figure, error in explanation?
Talk:Protestantism in the Philippines

message: As pointed out by one user in the History track of this article, the Apostolic Catholic Church is not a protestant denomination.  And indeed this is so because what distinguishes Protestantism from the Roman Catholic Church are the solas of the Reformation such as the doctrines of sola fide and sola scriptura.  These are the very doctrines that caused the break between the Roman Church and the Reformed Church. Furthermore present-day Protestant Churches are those that can trace its origins to the Reformation. Insofar as the Apostolic Catholic Church is concerned, history is bereft of any indication that it is one of those that have descended from the early Reformers.  What is apparent is that it adheres to traditional Roman Catholic teachings such as Marian Devotion and the use of the rosary in prayer albeit the fact that it does not recognize the supremacy of the Pope. The same also applies to the Philippine Independent Church. I suggest that we remove these groups from the list. As an alternative, we can have them listed in a "See also" section. Thinkinggecko (talk) 08:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thus far, no objection has been raised on the above suggestion.  I am proceeding with its implementation. Thinkinggecko (talk) 13:21, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection to the removal but not all Protestant Churches are "Reformed" (i.e. Calvinist) nor do they all accept "sola fide" and "sola scriptura".  See for instance Anglicanism. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 14:08, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Apostolic Catholic Church

message: The list of denominations needs to be pared back to only the most significant of denominations and megachurches.  Remember Wikipedia is WP:Not a directory.  Also we could use a chart of denominations, years founded and membership estimates. --Iloilo Wanderer (talk) 02:10, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  List clean-up 
Talk:Bengal slow loris

message: I'm starting a list (below) for potential sources that still need to be reviewed/incorporated before a FAC run. – VisionHolder « talk » 09:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential sources 
Talk:MV Aeolian Sky

message: This started article could do with the following information added
As there were no recorded fatalities presumably the "handful of crew" left the ship. How and when?
Was there any enquiry into the sinking?
Follow up on any fallout from the denial of entry by the Solent Ports (Southampton and Portsmouth).
These notes were made by me some time ago but I obviously forgot to sign them. Sorry! Britmax (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Paul Preuss (climber)

message: Akseli9, please stop reverting this change. Regarding the sentence that begins, "Even before the Joneses' tragedy. . . ": The tragedy involved two people named Jones. So, there were two Joneses.  The plural of a last name follows the normal rules of pluralization: If it ends in an s, you add -es. The possessive of a plural that ends in an s or z sound is formed by adding an apostrophe.
Another option, which may be what you and the original author intended, would be "Jones tragedy," in which Jones is used as a noun modifier (noun adjunct) for tragedy. Normally, noun modifiers are singular, so Jones is correct. An apostrophe would be incorrect in this case.
"the Jones's tragedy" (your change) cannot possibly be correct under any interpretation. "The Jones" (singular) makes no sense in any construction. Jones's is the possessive of the singular Jones, but the tragedy involved two Joneses. If using a noun modifier, Jones's is also incorrect, as noun modifiers do not assume a possessive form. Finally, Jones's cannot be a plural form, since plurals are not formed using apostrophes (except in rare situations that do not apply here). Holy (talk) 18:27, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural of ''Jones'' and possessive of ''Joneses''
Talk:Don't Go to Sleep

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't this film based on a book or a short story written by Stephen King?  --Ivan Linares (talk) 23:06, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's such a good film. So good that it is a cult film and one of the best TV movies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:B7D5:C800:9DEC:25C6:C90D:4F9B (talk) 17:55, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How good is it?
Talk:Kensington High Street

message: I've hidden (i.e. put between   ) the subsection on Scarsdale House, within the History section. The reason is that it's completely unsourced, and half of the listed tenants link to disambiguation pages, making it impossible to figure out which person is meant. If you can put it back with proper sourcing and working links, please do so! Lennart97 (talk) 23:45, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scarsdale House
Talk:Junior Eurovision Song Contest 2007

message: Since when are these confirmed? NDR said they would never enter only last year, and the other Swiss broadcasters said a similar thing. Is there any source to it?
I agree, the information on this page is purely speculation and needs to be edited. We might as well just wait for a press release announcing the countries. And is there really any need for an article for 2008 to be set up now?! --Gottago 15:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Germany, Austria & Switzerland 

message: In this yr's JESC, I wuld lyk 22 nations lyk in the ESC in 1990 2 make it more exciting! (82.10.78.72 22:02, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of participants 
Talk:Canada Life Building

message: There is two sets of running lights.  I believe one set is for temperature and the second set is for barometric pressure.  I can't find information to confirm this, but have seen them running in opposite directions.
I think it should be mentioned that it has been widely rumoured that the weather beacon was designed as an airship mooring post.  It isn't true, of course, but I think it should be mentioned to clear up this urban  myth.  Plus, it's a really cool myth.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.100.177.159 (talk) 04:02, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; the Canada Life building is clearly Art Deco. Longtimelurkerfirsttimeeditor (talk) 07:43, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject London/Assessment

message: British Airways is under your scope and has just received A-Class status under the quality scale used by WP:AVIATION and was wondering if it needs three editors from the London WikiProject to say its A-Class under your WP as well or if it can just be changed to A-Class since it has gone through the required screening. The, now archived, review page is here. Thanks, Plane Person (talk) 16:24, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Airways request 

message: Would someone be so kind as to review Pimlico?  I've made substantial changes to this, and am quite pleased with how it now looks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grayme (talk • contribs) 13:41, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: request for assesment

message: It'd be useful if there were some short instructions on how the assessment procedure works, especially for users who may not be familiar with the system. The main assessment page explains the different categories and rating system, but not the procedure (if any) to implement this, in particular:
* How are articles first assessed?
* When/how is an article reassessed?
* How does the assessment robot work?
I've been recently working on some improvements to the Smithfield,_London article and I notice it still doesn't have a WPLondon template/assessment.
--DarTar 16:36, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment procedure
Talk:Carbendazim

message: Brazil banded the fungisite and most of the country like america banded use of carbendazim. 120.89.105.20 (talk) 15:40, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which country banded the use of carbendazim W.P
Talk:John X. Merriman

message: Much can be added from here http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/John_Xavier_Merriman --Ted-m (talk) 03:30, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  1911 Brittannica 
Talk:Louis Botha

message: There is an error in the allegiance category as it states Louis Botha had allegiance to the Natalia Republic which wold be impossible as the Natalia Republic was annexed by Britain almost twenty years before Louis Botha was even born. I think the person who edited this meant to place the  Vryheid Republic as Botha was indeed part of the establishment of this republic in the northern Natal.   Ron7 (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegiance: Natalia Republic
Category talk:United States Air Force generals

message: I see that in this page there is no link to several important generals. Carl Spaatz, the first Air Force Chief of Staff, is not listed.
:See Help:Category for instructions on how to add category links to articles. I removed "GENERAL WALTER C. SWEENEY JR. LIEUTENANT GENERAL GLENN O. BARCUS" from the article. If these men have articles, then cat tags should be added to their pages. 70.20.149.174 (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:First Family Church

message: Hello,
I have noticed an issue with both sources 8 and 21. 21 does not seem to actually be citing anything, and 8 brings an error. Can anyone help find the proper sources? If not, are there any objections to removing the information until proper sourcing is found? 
Thanks, Joannahcrosby (talk) 19:52, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invalid Sources 
Talk:George A. Bartlett

message: Clearly this article does not meet the suggested criteria for deletion.  It is generally accepted that members of the US congress are notable.  This article shows when he served and who proceeded and succeeded him.  It is clearly not an external link farm. Yes, it needs expansion which is why it is marked as a stub.  Clearly the number of links shows some additional support for an article.  The issue with people who died long ago is that the number of online sources is limited making it more time consuming to gather data.  This is not a reason to delete notable stub articles.  Vegaswikian 19:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy deletion request
Talk:Flag of the Republic of the Rio Grande

message: The first version of this article is a translation from :nl:Vlag van de Republiek van de Rio Grande (permanent link). NL-Ninane 19:35, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this article notable enough on its own?  Or should we merge it with the Republic of the Rio Grande article?  TuckerResearch (talk) 01:53, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable? 

message: Apparently, the original flag, which is found within the Republic of the Rio Grande Museum in Laredo, has a green bottom bar instead of a black one, according to those of who have seen the flag --Wardie1993 (talk) 23:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green bar on the original flag? 

message: I've split some of the content to the Flag of Laredo, Texas. It makes more sense to have a separate city flag article now that the flag of the republic is disputed. I've not copied over any of the dispute information, as this is still based primarily on primary sources and original research. BilCat (talk) 19:19, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems like a good idea.  I will try to add some sources when I can. TuckerResearch (talk) 13:19, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: Here is the blue tricolor. Now that I have created this flag, I remember I have actually seen it before. There are various online groups in Mexico that claim to be "separatist movements" representing the Republic of the Rio Grande. They are of questionable seriousness, but they use this flag to represent their movement for whatever reason. Martianman64 (talk) 20:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd love to find some sources for these separatist movements! TuckerResearch (talk) 18:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue tricolor
Talk:T-board

message: The entry for T-board is basically an advertisemnet.  This guy is apparently in love with his t-board, so he's talking it up.  He has no right to say that it gives a better ride than a longboard, that's purely subjective.  Just stick to the facts- a t-board is a two wheeled skateboard that some people think gives a better ride than a skateboard. 
But this poster/boarder is skeptical- this device is just too new-fangled to be making those types of claims.  Let's see if it makes it even to the "fad" stage and has any staying power before we decide what board gives the best ride. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.180.211.137 (talk • contribs) 19:37, April 3, 2007
:Removed second paragraph, reduced to facts, added  and  ∴ here…♠ 20:25, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of view