Talk:Emanuele Filiberto of Savoy, Prince of Venice

message: Please merge relevant content, if any, from [ Princess Luisa of Savoy] per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Princess Luisa of Savoy.   (If there is nothing to merge, just leave it as a redirect.)  Thanks. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-02 08:10Z
I have just changed the first part of the article. It was not enough clear that the reason why everybody knows Emanuele is that he is the grandson of the last King of Italy, this infomation should be the first to be read by everyone.
I don't wanna cause an edit battle but the person who is keeping on changing this page is using wikipedia in a criminal way. Nobody can write Emanuel is titular prince of Venice and Piedmont if THE ITALIAN GOVERNAMENT DOESN'T RECOGNIZE IT. You can write he claims to be the prince.. or that he is known as the prince ... even if he is not. Yuo probably don't know because you're not even italian and you don't even speak the language, but he has just finished being on tv tonight and no one called him prince, just because you can't be a prince if that title is not recognized in the same country where you say you're the prince. Yet the father is not a pretender to the defunct throne of Italy, He and the son wrote to Ciampi in 2002 calling him President of Repubblic. Therefore he is not the son of the pretender... as you wrtoe, but the GRANDSON OF THE LAST KING OF ITALY. Is it clear?  
write here why you wanna change the page instead keeping on doing it without leaving any comment, this is vandalism.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.190.49.9 (talk) 02:29, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't you understand a meaning of "titular"? --Motsu (talk) 03:36, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please stop editing. You don't understand technical terms clearly, "titular" "title" etc. --Motsu (talk) 03:42, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

text: "Titular Prince of Venice ~" means that title created by abolished monarch or pretender. His father is pretender and created him "Prince of Venice~", So he is "Titular Prince of Venice ~". Is this OK? --Motsu (talk) 03:57, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

text: That's not title. And the person having "Titular title" as a policy is to make entry. So, it was described with "Prince of Venice ~" there. I think, you should have only added "Grandson of the last King of Italy" to the appropriate position of the text.  --Motsu (talk) 04:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  83.190.56.145, would you re-edit it if you understood my thought? You denied the sentence of other members from misunderstanding. In addition, you wrote different things in the place that should have written "Title". It's too bad, these are Vandalism. Therefore, other members should revert these edits (I do it if it isn't performed in the near future). I think that you should revert your edits, and should add "grandson ~" "government ~", having respected the editing of other people. And you should entrust the result to the judgment of other members. --Motsu (talk) 23:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Princess Luisa of Savoy]] 

message: An IP has removed from the lead, the Prince's participation at Sanremo as a contestant which needs to be there as the lead is an overview of major points in the article. I am not including this as a publicity piece, but as an event which is a notable fact about the Prince, ergo needs to be in the lead.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 10:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sanremo needs to be in the lead

message: Prince Emanuelle claimed he had an affair with Kate Moss at the time of her pregnancy resulting in her daughter Lila G Moss / Hack - also reputed to be daughter of magazine editor Jeff Hack... .   This 'princess of Italy' should be added to the personal section.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.186.56.245 (talk) 05:25, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Illegitimate children (i.e. children born out of wedlock) are not considered members of the royal dynasty. 161.24.19.112 (talk) 12:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: daughter with Kate Moss

message: Extensive Edits to this article initiated on 13 July 2012 have altered it drastically by imposing peacock hyperbole and autobiographical style. Although it appears to include validly updated info, the unsourced adjectives, interests and career moves unfortunately put it in violation of BLP. If not changed to a more neutral tone and properly sourced for accuracy, these edits may not stand. FactStraight (talk) 09:00, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peacock edits 

message: The section Other Activities is in my opinion nothing but a PR puff section befitting a Reality TV personality not a biography of an Italian Royal. There is  not one citation that I can see. Is something going to be done about it because frankly it should otherwise just be deleted in my opinion. Solidzz (talk) 21:34, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Activities 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Emanuele Filiberto of Savoy, Prince of Venice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140811170343/http://www.tuttosport.com/adnkronos/cronaca/2011/01/06-102265/Savoia+s%C3%AC+o+no%3F+Giurista+'boccia'+sentenza+che+vieta+il+cognome+ad+Amedeo to http://www.tuttosport.com/adnkronos/cronaca/2011/01/06-102265/Savoia+s%C3%AC+o+no%3F+Giurista+'boccia'+sentenza+che+vieta+il+cognome+ad+Amedeo
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Who is his heir is disputed. Not everyone who recognise HIM as king recognise his father's pragmatic sanction of 2019. It's not the same claim as the initial Aosta claim. But after his death many will recognise Aosta as new king. It's like the Russian one. Many of those who recognised Vladimir until his very death in 1992 did in no way recognise his daughter Maria. And this one is even more dubious, as there are no non-morganatic Russian agnates left, while the Aosta are certainly non-morganatic. --95.24.69.178 (talk) 12:43, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you posting about Emmanual's daughter? GoodDay (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Comment: "while the Aosta are certainly non-morganatic." Are you sure? Aimone is the last Dynast of the Savoys if you want apply the viewpoint and law of "equal marriage" valid during the italian monarchy regarding dynastic marriages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.197.249.58 (talk) 23:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean the descent from Marina Karella? Well, maybe. But I was actually solely speaking about the person of Aimone, not his children. --95.24.65.57 (talk) 20:05, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  His heir