lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Batales

message: This article should definitely be merged with Brassicales. The order Batales is not recognized in the APG II classification. All of the molecular phylogenetic studies give strong statistical support to the Brassicales clade as defined by APG II and they show that Bataceae and Gyrostemonaceae are deeply embedded, rather than basal in Brassicales. Batales should be considered a defunct order, but is recent enough to be included in a brief taxonomic history of Brassicales. For information, i recommend the Angiosperm Phylogeny Website maintained by Peter F. Stevens. More can be found in Plant Systematics: A Phylogenetic Approach. 98.155.231.71 (talk) 23:07, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Space Cowboy (Jamiroquai song)

message: "This version is commonly known as the "Stoned Again Mix", even though it is the original version of the track"
It was released before the album version. But the album version was recorded first and is arguably the original version. Right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.255.147.12 (talk) 17:38, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Nvm, the single was recorded first it seems!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.255.147.12 (talk) 00:48, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album version vs single version 

message: It may be soft rock sounding but more jazz fusion than I thought for this. AdwenKnowItAll (talk) 11:53, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sounds like [[soft rock]]
Talk:Outline of organic chemistry

message: This page is part of the hierarchical Portal:Contents/Outline of knowledge navigation system as explained above. I have reverted the page move to List of organic chemistry topics back to the long established Outline of organic chemistry and have added the removed outline templates back in. The move was not discussed and is highly controversial and provocative in light of the recent discussions about outlines. If you want to get rid of the outline system then you have to initiate a community-wide open and transparent debate instead of sabotaging the project on individual articles. Cacycle (talk) 13:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The move was a revert to the original name, and hence you have to justify the rename. I have undone your controversial move which is against policy. Please establish consensus for any rename, and establishing consensus for your templates etc, and outlines in general, would help. Verbal chat 13:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

text: I don't see a problem with dropping the "basic". The article can then be expanded, and scope can be made clear in the article. Removing "basic" doesn't seem at all controversial. There was no content at the deleted article, just redirects. Verbal chat 17:48, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outline 

message: This article was named "List of basic organic chemistry topics", and belonged to a set of pages that shared that naming convention and the same layout and organization format.  That whole set was renamed to "Outline of" about 2 years ago.  It got estranged from the set about a year later.
This page matches the rest of the outlines, and is listed as one of them on Portal:Contents.  It is confusing that it has a non-matching name.
I'm returning it to the set.
The Transhumanist 00:29, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Outline of organic chemistry 

message: "Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure), and as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. The hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation.  The Transhumanist 00:08, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick explanation of Wikipedia outlines
Talk:Adelaide United FC/Archive 1

message: Could an Administrator move this page so that it is consistent with other Australian football (soccer) club names, which don't have dots after F & C. – AxSkov (☏) 11:33, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, I originally moved the page from Adelaide United to F.C. (with full stops) because that's the way they spell it on the club logo. Then I conscientiously added a redirect at FC (without full stops), which is the reason why you're having trouble. J.K. 12:24, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

text: I'm not fussed. J.K. 14:27, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't see any issues with this (on the other hand, I'm not sure that many people would care so much), except that you would have to redo some pages to avoid double redirects. Cursive 14:18, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move request

message: Does the flags against the players' names add anything or serve any purpose ? given that all but one is Australian it just seems like noise Oliyoung 12:16, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality flags

message: Nathan Burns is on the squad list on this page as MF - midfielder, but on the Adelaide website (team page) as a striker... should this be changed, or he an attacking midfielder that should stay as he is on this page? --- Wantok 09:40, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nathan Burns 

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and may or may not be accurate for the article in question.
*Per WP:CONTEXT and WP:MOSDATE, months and days of the week generally should not be linked. Years, decades, and centuries can be linked if they provide context for the article.
*Per WP:MOSNUM, there should be a non-breaking space -   between a number and the unit of measurement. For example, instead of 18mm, use 18 mm, which when you are editing the page, should look like: 18 mm.See footnote
See footnote
*The article will need references. See WP:CITE and WP:V for more information.
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that the it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 2a. See footnote
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Daniel.Bryant 12:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Adelaide United FC]]
Talk:List of You're Under Arrest characters

message: To those who are contributing to editing this article. should we add the minor officers who appeared in a few episodes or what? Ominae 02:14, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question on adding minor police officers/other characters? 

message: Good grief, what's with all these posts demanding people justify the use of small, low-resolution screen captures to illustrate the characters? It's fair use because it's not trying to prevent the publishers from making money (does anyone even buy Tahou stuff anymore?). Hell, the images are no substitute for sitting down and reading or watching the manga, anime or drama. Sheesh. When did Wikipedia turn into a fascist's paradise?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.167.136.139 (talk) 03:08, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use rationale?
Talk:Bengt Lidforss

message: Lidforss shared with his time - and with present days' sionism - the idea that jews were a particular people that didn't blend with the peoples they lived among. But he was no antisemite. See what he wrote (quoted in the Swedish wikipedia article about him):
Allt hvad Tyskland äger av småsinthet, chauvinism, brutalitet och oridderlighet tyckes samladt i detta monstrum, som vill förgöra ett folk, hvilket vi alltsedan vår första ungdom lärt oss akta och älska. Hvilken tack äro vi icke skyldiga de judiska genierna! Var det icke Heine, som med Sångernas bok gaf oss en helsobringande trolldryck, när en gång för länge sedan den första kärlekens kval höll på att slå oss till jorden. Var inte Georg Brandes en gång vår trognaste bundsförvant i den inre frigörelsekamp, vi alla kämpat mot fördomar och öfvertro, var det inte han, som lärde oss förstå att skönhetens genius äfven är frihetens. Och var det inte sedan Marx, som lät nya världar med en ny kultur härga för oss vid horisonten, och var det ej Lombroso, som med sin forsknings blindlykta kastade en ljusstrimma öfver de dunklaste krafterna i vår själ, vansinnet, genialiteten och kärleken till brottet... Judar utefter hela linjen, hvarannan milstolpe på vår själs utvecklingsväg ett judiskt geni!.
You can easily translate with DeepL. An antisemite doesn't write like this. 2A02:8429:50A0:5901:E198:9F28:3393:4A07 (talk) 19:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that the term anti-semite in this context needs to be defined more carefully. I had a look at the usage here  which says "To the botanist Bengt Lidforss, the Jews belonged to a race, with racial distinctions and racial instincts. A Jew would never, in his view, truly understand or experience the depths of what Lidforss knew as the Germanic soul, its art, literature, poetry, music and love for nature. Lidforss did not assert that the Jews were inferior to what was labelled ‘Germanic’ or ‘Aryan’ peoples, but only profoundly different. Therefore, he was also positive about the ‘national awakening’ of the Jews at the same time that he opposed Jewish influence in Swedish culture". It further talks about the labour movement in Sweden - "Nonetheless, this was marginal in socialist rhetoric and neither was it combined with opposition to Jewish rights or to Jews in general. The central leaders of the movement usually condemned antisemitic movements in Germany and pogroms in Russia". It is easy to misinterpret statements like "Lidforss was an anti-Semite" as given in  https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5149/9781469657141_blackwell which can be misinterpreted. Shyamal (talk) 02:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lidforss' antisemitism
Talk:Benjamin Smith Barton

message: "Historians have erroneously claimed that Barton then studied at the University of Göttingen, but this has yet to be verified" This is not true.
Barton's educational history is now well-established. See: Whitfield J. Bell, Jr., “Benjamin Smith Barton, MD (Kiel),” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, vol. 26, p. 197-203.
and
Joseph Ewan and Nesta Dunn Ewan, Benjamin Smith Barton: Naturalist and Physician in Jeffersonian America. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, vol. 100, Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, 2007.
Barton never attended Gottingen or any continental college or university. He was educated at the College in Philadelphia and at Edinburgh Univ. and returned to Philadlephia without a medical degree from Edinburgh.
A few years after his return to Philadelphia he purchased a medical degree from the Univ. of Kiel. This is all well documented by University records and letters from Barton and others.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.160.218.42 (talk) 23:39, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:I'm in the Mood for Love

message: Brenda Lee version featured in Victoria's Secret Super Bowl ads.-71.174.175.150 (talk) 03:19, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victoria's Secret Super Bowl ads 

message: King Pleasure who did a famous vocalese of James Moody's improvisation is missing from your list. The words were written by Eddie Jefferson who also recorded it later. Their version is vastly more important historically than say the humdrum Rod Stewart's. Tofindya (talk) 18:06, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing - King Pleasure & Eddie Jefferson
Talk:Bessey system

message: Added links to Alternifoliae subclasses, and created new page dealing with Strobiloideae. Unclear why this was reverted so undid till this was discussed here. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 14:51, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: OK I see the problem - --Michael Goodyear (talk) 14:55, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

text: and I have fixed it by referring to usage in original work --Michael Goodyear (talk) 23:17, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subclasses
Talk:Birbal Sahni

message: I have done the following to this article
* Improved the infobox from person to scientist
* Hatnote:  Did not add any as no similar search results come up  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikishagnik (talk • contribs) 18:38, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Note:  There is a ton of work done by this scientist and thousands of articles that cite him as a source. An expert can certainly clean up this article a lot Wikishagnik (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 18:35, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attempts to Wikify
Talk:Blytt–Sernander system

message: Blytt-Sernander classification or Blytt-Sernander sequence, but not "Blytt-Sernander", an adjectival form that is jargon left by itself. Someone knowledgable in this field can move this article to its most common designation in the literature. (Not being a product of the U.S. public high schools, I do not look Deep Within Myself for the answer.)--Wetman 02:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Ride the Tiger (book)

message: Is there a connection between this book and the song of the same name by Jefferson Starship? Cranston Lamont 08:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

message: I have changed the description of Evola as a "fascist philosopher" to a "Traditionalist philsopher," with "Traditionalist" linking to the Traditionalist School (which considers Guénon foundational).  Evola was not a "fascist philosopher," in either of the two senses:  1) a philosopher who presented philosophical arguments in favour of fascism (Gentile, Rosenberg, Yockey), or 2) a philosopher who happened to support fascism (Heidegger, Schmitt, Eliade).  Evola was never a member of the Fascist Party, openly criticised aspects of fascism that he considered anti-traditional as well as praising aspects of fascism that he considered in line with tradition, and was considered inimical by Himmler.  He successfully acquitted himself of the charge of fostering a rebirth of fascism in 1951.  He was a traditionalist, and critiqued fascism from that viewpoint as he did communism and liberal democracy; that he saw fascism as being slightly more in line with tradition than he did the other two does not make him a fascist.128.164.214.138 (talk) 18:54, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He is, however, essential to neo-fascism, but that's not really the same ideology, and something traditionalists are/were called by critics. 
16:01, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "fascist philosopher"
Talk:Nylon Beat

message: I love to have had the patience to learn Finnish!! This is from Finnish article: mutta kesällä 2007 duo tekee kaksi paluukeikkaa Toto -yhtyeen lämmittelijänä, Oulussa 17. elokuuta ja Tampereella 18. elokuuta. They will be warm-upper for Toto gigs in Oulu on 17. August and in Tampere on 18. August! Great stuff! -andy 91.32.91.89 08:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  UPDATE! NB WILL BE WARM-UPPER FOR TOTO IN SUMMER '07!
Talk:Kenneth McMillan (actor)

message: I just did some edits to tidy up the article.  Feel free to revert anything that doesn't seem suitable.
Warm regards, --Greatwalk 08:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quick tidy

message: Have watched this fine actor in many, many roles and have always been impressed by his range (although even he couldn't do much with that horrible role in Dune), but perhaps his greatest role had to have been being a real life sales clerk at Gimbels...that is really hard to imagine, but certainly must have been a great motivation to become an actor (or just about anything else).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:801:4280:A710:54A8:D29D:26C0:3779 (talk) 22:30, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Sales Clerk?
Talk:Bulb

message: My most recent edit was aimed only at the semantics involving the need to specify that a bulb relates to a plant. However, characterizing a bulb as a plant "stem with fleshy leavesor leaf bases", as attributed to A.D. Bell, seems equivocal. Both bulbs and leaves are attached to stems, but I don't think it's fair to characterize a bulb as a stem per se. I.e., bulbs and stems have entirely different functions. I'd say it's better to characterize a bulb as "a somewhat rounded organ or cluster of organs as a food supply attached to a stem or root of certain plants." That's the definition I use in my original research; sorry I don't have an independent cite for this article. Kent Dominic·(talk) 16:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lede is sorely in need of revision 

message: The article neglects to point out the following:
* Only aboveground bulbs have leaves while underground bulbs technically have either scales or skins (despite how some sources nonetheless call them leaves)
* Bulbs can be distinguished from fruits since fruits have seeds but bulbs don't
* Some underwater plants (like some species of Nymphaea, Aponogeton, and Najas) have rhizomes that might be considered bulbs
Kent Dominic·(talk) 16:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miscellaneous edits needed
Talk:Nader Jahanbani

message: Can we please add a hyperlink to it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Viral weirdo (talk • contribs) 07:32, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what is Wahdati AFB in Khuzestan
Talk:Banat, Bačka and Baranja

message: The ethnic composition figures seem odd and are not actually supported by the offered reference available through Google Books (Brett Paulston & Peckham). Consistency of the figures claimed there and those attributed to Njegovan make the Njegovan reference dubious too.
BP&P on relevant page 76 explicitly states the percentages reported in the article but also explicitly states those apply to the area corresponding to 1948 definition of Vojvodina - i.e. excluding Baranja and 1948 Romanian part of Banat. The population size would not make sense either, because Banat article indicates that it would alone have about the same size of population (560 thousand in Serbian Banat and 820 thousand in Romanian Banat = about 1.38 M total) as reported for Banat, Bačka and Baranja which is clearly impossible: Demographic history of Bačka indicates additional 735 thousand living in the region and Pécs in Baranya alone had about 60 thousand inhabitants. Given the information in the BP&P source it is only logical to conclude that the percentages and the population size apply to a differently defined territory - likely corresponding to 1948 Vojvodina.--Tomobe03 (talk) 13:14, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic composition
Talk:Byron Halsted

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Photograph/portrait should be added from a source with a free license if available
*Short paragraphs need amalgamating
*Article needs expanding and should emphasise reasons for notability of subject
*Article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*Information on research should be expanded and references required
*References should be expanded, and converted to inline format
*External links ...
*External links to useful online resources should be added if available
Espresso Addict 18:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments
Talk:Calakmul Biosphere Reserve

message: Article review: I have implemented a few minor edits in terms of spelling, grammar, and changes to the phrasing. Other than that, this article is organized well. You may want to take a look into where your references are placed, just to make it clear which information belongs with which source/reference. For instance, under flora and fauna there is a reference placed before a list of fauna in the area. Perhaps the reference should be placed after the list? This is just a suggestion, whereas it may not be clear who the information belongs to. Otherwise, good article! MtADorey (talk) 17:20, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: You have done a great job adding a substantial amount of material. I did some editing and changed some wording. I might just be reading my own bias into the article, but I think it could be beneficial to look over your wording in the Political Issues section to make sure that the language is entirely neutral. I think it was a great idea to mention current political issues! The article has a nice variety of information, so the reader feels as if he or she has gained a thorough understanding of the site. Nice use of links to other Wikipedia sites too. Great job! Allisunshine (talk) 19:12, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review 
Talk:Calcium deficiency (plant disorder)

message: Hypocalcaemia is an electrolyte disturbance and is not the same as calcium deficiency. I'm removing the reference. --Rhombus 03:02, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hypocalcaemia is not the same as calcium deficiency
Talk:Bulgarian Empire

message: i think a map is needed--Bezuidenhout (talk) 16:10, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there are tons of map. The question is which period should be shown. Maybe when the empire was at its biggest extend? --Laveol T 20:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAP 

message: Please provide neutral academic secondary sources for your edit and talk it on the discussion-page. It sounds as science-fiction, i.e. biased nationalistic POV.Jingiby (talk) 09:29, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange massive edit 

message: According to Encyclopedia Britannica: Bulgaria lost its independence in 1018 and remained subject to Byzantium for more than a century and a half, until 1185. With the collapse of the first Bulgarian state, the Bulgarian church fell under the domination of Greek ecclesiastics who took control of the see of Ohrid and attempted to replace the Bulgarian Slavic liturgy with a Greek liturgy.   Jingiby (talk) 05:05, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  End of the First Bulgarian Empire as per Encyclopedia Britannica