Talk:Bob Dylan/Archive 3

message: I think it would be wise, since Bob Dylan is one of the most covered artists of all time, to includea section dedicated to Bob Dylan songs covered by other artists. But maybe instead, because this page is so crowded a whole new page should be created.  
here are some songs that would make the list:
"Maggie's Farm" by Rage Against the Machine
"Knockin' on Heaven's Door" by Eric Clapton and Guns n' Roses
I am forgeting the many other songs, so i think it would be wise for another person to start the page.
:"Knockin' on Heaven's Door" by Roger Waters, and also by Avril Lavinge;  "All I really want to do" by Cher come to my mind.  Behdad 02:36, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  A section dedicated to covers of Bob Dylan songs done by popular bands 

message: Live at the Gaslight 1962 and the seventh volume of The Bootleg Series were released not long ago (about a month or less), and I think that we should at least put in a mention. We can't go about compromising the Wiki's up-to-dateness, can we?
And, also, someone linked to Live 1975, Rolling Thunder Revue as just Live 1975, which is a bad link.
Kaishin 01:47, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates?

message: Well there you go again with the attacks.  Could you stop that please?  It's fundamental Wikipedia policy to avoid personal attacks and that policy exists precisely because we're supposed to be editing an encyclopedia and not engaging in petty personal squabbles.  I'll wait for some input from other editors, including Monicasdude, but in any case I won't be performing any edits. --Tony SidawayTalk 00:10, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Saying that Monicasdude has done these things in the past is not a personal attack, it's just factual.  Calling me stupid, ignorant, meglomanaical, delusional, a "fragrant [sic]" hypocrite, liar, and so on.... well, it's not quite as nice.  And that's just in the last couple days. It's hard to see a lot of good faith in there. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 00:26, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attacks? 

message: I noticed that someone changed the Commentary title to "Commentary on Religious Themes." Is this appropriate as the link to the "ambiguity" article appears to be non-religious? Also, should someone else want to add some commentary of a non-religious nature, where would they put it? Therefore, I think the word "Commentary" would be better. Especially as each of the links now has its own description. I will not make the change back to what it was. But if the one who narrowed the section by adding the other words, wants to undo it, I do think it will be better. Anyone7 10:55 CST, 27 September 2005
:"Commentary" by itself seems too generic.  Just about everything linked to, in every heading, is commentary of some sort.  If you have an idea for a better characterization of what's common in the four links, please make the change. (though I do wish, Anyone7, that you'd register a regular account so the edits are easier to identify, and comments easier to sign; quite likely the username 'Anyone7' is available, or something else you like). Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 05:14, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commentary on religious themes