Talk:Fuqua School of Business

message: :Image:FuquaMap.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:FuquaMap.PNG

message: This article has gradually assumed the form of a marketing brochure.  While it's all referenced, it isn't written appropriately for an encyclopedia and reads as a product of the public relations office.  The article should emphasize a long view of the school's influence, rather than a short-term marketing-driven approach. Acroterion (talk) 14:21, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article cleanup

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fuqua School of Business. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130916145214/http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/rankings to http://www.businessweek.com/bschools/rankings
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Fuqua School of Business. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110108070130/http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2010/01/kunshan.html to http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2010/01/kunshan.html
*Added  tag to http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_GX/global/press/28a8792f76782310VgnVCM3000001c56f00aRCRD.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110423115945/http://www.panerabread.com/about/company/mgmt.php to http://www.panerabread.com/about/company/mgmt.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: User:SamsungFuqua has begun an edit war to include rankings and admissions information in the lede of this article, stating that "All info properly cited. This page is constantly over edited by content editors. Please compare this page to any other business top school as they all have similar lead-in information." The information is cited; I don't dispute that.  I don't think it's at all accurate to state that "[t]his page is constantly over edited by content editors" as the article's edit history isn't terribly active at all.  And I have little interest in comparing this article to others when we have more relevant guidelines and project-wide policies that are more appropriate and helpful.
To be blunt, it seems promotional and undue to include specific rankings in the lede of any college or university article. The lede should be a summary of the body of the article, not a selection of specific facts that one editor has chosen to highlight especially when there appears to be a promotional motivation. ElKevbo (talk) 05:25, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rankings in lede 

message: These lists are too long, and, I think, should only include those with articles on Wikipedia. I had deleted the non-WP:N, but restored it because it turned out to be such a big deletion. I think we have to draw the line at those with pages on these lists, though. 107.15.231.35 (talk) 04:16, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists of non-WP:N