Talk:Disappearance of the Beaumont children

message: I was wondering if the Beaumont children were the same ones that the Lemony Snicket books are based on? Does anyone know? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chedcat (talk • contribs) 01:10, 14 November 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Initial message

message: I propose we move this article to Beaumont children disappearance to bring the article title more in line with the remainder of the Australian crime articles covering disappearances, such as the Azaria Chamberlain disappearance, and the Peter Falconio disappearance. -- Longhair | Talk 13:22, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine by me. Ambi 14:12, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not opposed.--Cyberjunkie 05:03, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done -- Longhair | Talk 06:06, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to a new name?

message: Should that Biography WikiProject banner really be there?  — AnnaKucsma   (Talk to me!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnnaKucsma (talk • contribs) 14:43, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography

message: The section titled "Other cases and a possible solution" is deceiving and should be cleaned up in general.  There is no "possible solution" presented, although it may be inferred due to the mention of other children who had been murdered.  If there is a definitive "possible solution" to explore, it should be explained. GCD1 20:15, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right.  Have changed it to "other cases" which I think could be improved upon, but I can't think of a better header at the moment. Rossrs 20:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  "Other Possible Related Cases" maybe? Just a suggestion...Engr105th (talk) 10:15, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other cases and a possible solution? 

message: When describing the claims of the witness (presumably Mr. B, though the article fails to name him), the article relates his claims regarding what von Einem said as fact, rather than hearsay. For example, "Von Einem also told the witness that he had taken two girls from the Adelaide Oval during a football match." Since this is not proven fact, shouldn't it read "Von Einem also allegedly told the witness that he had taken two girls from the Adelaide Oval during a football match"? Evil bacteria (talk) 22:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bevan Spencer von Einem 

message: Per WP:BLPSPS, we cannot use self-published sources to discuss who might be the perpetrator. Some of the people involved with this crime are still living. I just removed three of these blogs and websites. Binksternet (talk) 02:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't use self-published sources as this article has BLP ramifications 

message: Adelaide that day was sweltering through a scorcher... that's partly why Nancy gave them permission to go to the beach. It should be mentioned. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 22:13, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it really doesn't need mentioning.  It's not especially relevant and it's really rather dull besides.  70.54.140.168 (talk) 05:10, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  the day was a scorcher... that's why Nancy gave them permission. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Beaumont children disappearance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160205160031/http://cccnews.info/2014/10/13/an-interesting-mystery-what-happened-to-the-beaumont-children/ to http://cccnews.info/2014/10/13/an-interesting-mystery-what-happened-to-the-beaumont-children/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:27, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Do we need to list the exact address? The house still exists and is still a private home. Should Wikipedia really encourage pranksters and ghoul tourism? thoughts,  ? Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 08:13, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd probably remove it. It's not essential to include the full address. Just giving the street name is enough, in my opinion. Melonkelon (talk) 11:47, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Their house was at 109 Harding Street"