Talk:List of engineering branches

message: I'm amazed that Automotive engineering hasn't been aded to this list. It is arguably one of the fields of engineering with which we are most in contact.
LewisR (talk) 07:53, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automotive 

message: Although some American schools (such as The Henry Krumb School of Mines at Columbia) seem to have stopped awarding mining engineering degrees, there are others, such as the Colorado School of Mines that do. Mining Engineering is not an historic relic. It is a modern discipline that is as advanced as any other field. Mining is NOT civil engineering. Civil engineers are not concerned with or trained in rock mechanics and ground control, or stope design. Mining does have sub-disciplines, such as minerals processing, mines maintenance (at some Canadian universities) etc. Also, those familiar with the origin of the term "civil" engineering, would wonder why military engineering is not on this list. If there are no objections, I would like to add mining as a current discipline of engineering (or branch for our American friends).John G Eggert (talk) 22:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. The present organization seems rather odd, petroleum engineering is listed as a specialized field and mining could be listed there also. Vsmith (talk) 02:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

text: Isn't petroleum engineering a specialisation of mining? --Chris.urs-o (talk) 11:36, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mining 

message: This article is largely redundant with Outline of engineering. 121.45.223.144 (talk) 04:47, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Outline of engineering? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of engineering branches. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131113190247/http://atmae.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=227&Itemid=48 to http://atmae.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=227&Itemid=48
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Attempting a copyedit of this highly redundant article upon request. Another editor summarily removed many of my changes with the explanation "Correct as written". I don't edit war, so I'm not going to reapply my changes. I would greatly appreciate other editors' feedback on this situation. I also note that some disciplines appear under multiple headings in the piece. An engineering expert will have to sort that out. I will suspend my efforts for now. Lfstevens (talk) 21:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit 

message: It was mentioned that software engineering is under the Interdisciplinary. In present times, software engineering has been the most preferred, so I guess it would be better if we mention why it was been included under Interdisciplinary. -NandithaMerugu (talk) 11:50, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: Hello,
I think if Chemical Engineering is listed as section with biomolecular engineering, process engineering, and materials engineering listed as subsections, I think biomedical engineering certainly deserves to harbor its own entire section.  Subsections are at least biomechanics, tissue engineering, medical imaging, etc.
Thoughts?
- Ambndms (talk) 00:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposition to make biomedical engineering its own section