Talk:Atomic layer deposition

message: * Why is the cost of the substrate relevant for the merit of ALD. You have a substrate and want to deposit on it with CVD/ALD/PVD. 
* Apart from very exceptional cases, how do the impurities in the substrate impact the ALD process? 
* The table "ALD Reaction Mechanisms Summary Table" has too many mistakes.
I fully concur that there are many inaccuracies, generalizations, and just mistakes on the page. The structure is also sub-par. Hopefully, I will have some time to work on updating the page.
94.211.28.33 (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies 

message: In response to Gjmulhol, ALD and ALE are essentially the same. ALD is self-limiting as well, with the first layer deposited on the substrate and the subsequent layers chemisorbed on each other via sequential half-reactions.
There is absolutely no reason to have two different articles. ALD is essentially the same as ALE. I see ALD much more often in literature, so I would suggest that the ALE article be merged with the ALD article.
These two processes are in fact the same and should be merged.
Gjmulhol 19:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not understand the "subtle distinction" between these two processes.  As far as I can tell, they're the same. --Smack (talk) 05:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge ALD and ALE 

message: Many citations are needed on the ALD page. While some of the claims made in the article may be legitimate, many are subject to debate. Most clearly, thickness control has been shown to be as low as 1 angstrom, but I have never seen control down to .1 (which is far smaller than the radius of most molecules). Also, recent literature suggests that the process is only self-limiting within certain exposure time ranges. Thus, it is incomplete to say that the process itself is entirely self-limiting.
Gjmulhol 19:43, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ALD citations needed 

message: A monolayer size of ~0.1 Angstroms is not realistic.  Check out the periodic table and the atomic radius of common ALD elements.  They are all much larger than that.  Did the author mean 0.1 nm?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.99.190.162 (talk) 13:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Information 

message: The grammar in the introduction needs some work.  I am by no means an English major so I have not made any changes but if someone would, it would improve the article.
I have rewritten the introduction. Anglyan (talk) 04:30, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: Honestly, I don't understand why the transport of reactants in an ALD reactor is phrased in terms of the Boltzmann equation for ALD.
I think this is unnecessarily complex, and the same equation can be rephrased as a plug flow model that is more accessible. As early as in 1995 Ylilammi used this model to reproduce growth profiles in ALD (see M. Ylilammi, J. Electrochem. Soc. 142, 2474 (1995)). Unless there are any good reasons I will update this section when I have time.
Anglyan (talk) 04:41, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Boltzmann? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Atomic layer deposition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080218145031/http://download.intel.com/technology/IEDM2007/HiKMG_paper.pdf to http://download.intel.com/technology/IEDM2007/HiKMG_paper.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100711205358/https://ccrma.stanford.edu/courses/192a/6-Magnetic_Recording.pdf to https://ccrma.stanford.edu/courses/192a/6-Magnetic_Recording.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050908182325/http://www.future-fab.com:80/documents.asp?d_ID=1669 to http://www.future-fab.com/documents.asp?d_ID=1669
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:27, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: At the moment there is a general worldwide volunteer-based history project on ALD going on called Virtual Project on the History of ALD (VPHA), project webpage http://vph-ald.com (related blog: http://aldhistory.blogspot.fi). One of the items of the Publication Plan of VPHA is to update Wikipedia what comes to the history of ALD (#11, http://vph-ald.com/Publication%20Plan.html). Soon we plan to significantly re-write the history section, according to the information that has been gathered in VPHA. Everybody who has been active in updating the Wikipedia ALD pages, is welcome to join VPHA. In addition to updating Wikipedia, we are also generating joint publications, the next one will be at the ALD 2016 conference in Ireland (deadline to join there as an author is Feb 7, 2016). What the history section at the moment needs is a notion that ALD has been developed independently twice. Also it has appeared that the Aleskovskii thesis does not yet contain a proposal for the concept of ALD, only of the "Matrix hypothesis". Anyone interested in joining the VPHA presentations and Wikipedia update effort is welcome to do so. As of January 2016, things are moving on; we are discussing in Twitter with hashtag #WikiALD. Posts in the ALD History Blog about Wikipedia updates can be found here: http://aldhistory.blogspot.fi/search/label/%23WikiALD. Also it is noteworthy that Wikimedia Commons has now an own category "Atomic Layer Deposition", to collect together media files related to this topic. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Atomic_layer_deposition 
Rlpuu (talk) 11:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History of ALD 

message: I'm considering writing articles on some of the more heavily used ALD processes, like the thermal trimethylaluminum/water Al2O3 process and the thermal TDMAH/water HfO2 one. Would that be appropriate? I've never written a Wikipedia article, so I have a hard time gauging that. Dakane2 (talk) 04:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding articles for specific processes 

message: rugs and carpets and rugs and carpets and rugs and carpets and rugs and carpets in support of the best way to go with the following link to the same and 41.221.178.132 (talk) 03:10, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  FHF pour votre réponse