Talk:Universal City, California

message: Universal City, California, Los Angeles OR  Universal City, California
:A precedet setting decision for one of the world's largest city's deserves wider discussion and input. 
:There is a definite lack of advance 'discussion width', which left me unaware of changes (considered or already done such as here) even though very active with L.A. Districts' articles. Personally I do not find using the word 'notorious' and L.A. used together by some 'change advocates' in other discussions positive or a npov backup. I'm neutral on the decision itself, but not on the process to date though.
:More transparency before further changes, with notification and 'auto-forwarding' of 'old 3 names' titles (in both article links and new searches) could avoid difficult startles. The Reseda, Los Angeles, California (OR Reseda, Los Angeles ?? eg: the 'crap shoot' problem for now...) has discussion on talk page of neighborhood vs. district vs. census-designated place (CDP). If the change is inevitable perhaps doing so in district name alphabetical order would take out random 'crap shoot' searching now (or explaining another system being used).  
:Please stop further districts' changes until this is resolved so we all know how to find an article. Thank you-Look2See1 t a l k → 22:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because most of Universal City is in unincorporated territory, this article has historically been written as if it was a full unincorporated area. Therefore, it uses the standard Placename, State naming convention as per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#United States, and thus was not affected by the discussion at Talk:Los_Angeles#Various_move_requests_involving_LA_Neighborhoods. Zzyzx11 (talk) 08:18, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature ? Changes ? Who Decides ? 

message: I managed to rewrite a segment of the section that was identified as needing changes but then had my attention diverted to the Lead section, as it also in need of changing. I am going to try and come back to this article later. --Soulparadox 03:50, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyediting 

message: The section on NBC's relocation is all about plans for 2011. It's 2013 now, so this should be updated to reflect what has actually been completed or is underway. I've added an "updatesection" tag accordingly. 70.72.211.35 (talk) 18:11, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: NBC relocation section outdated

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Universal City, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070913190430/http://fire.lacounty.gov/HometownFireStations/HometownFireStations.asp to http://fire.lacounty.gov/HometownFireStations/HometownFireStations.asp
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100125075225/http://www.lasd.org:80/stations/for2/westh-ucity/index.html to http://www.lasd.org/stations/for2/westh-ucity/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I see there is a population listed on the article, but no relevant source is attached to it. Does anyone know where the data is coming from, because I don't see this place listed in the Census. BhamBoi (talk) 04:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population Source?