lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Radian per second

message: The following equation is not correct
:2π rad/s = 1 Hz
it says that an angular velocity is equal to an ordinary frequency, which is a wrong way to put it (\omega = \nu). Instead one should say that an angular frequency of 2π rad/s corresponds to an ordinary frequency of 1 Hz. The same goes for the equation
:1 rad/s = 1/2π Hz
Say we have an angular frequency \omega = 2\pi\ rad/s. Then we can calculate the ordinary frequency:
:\nu(Hz) = \frac{\omega(rad/s)}{2\pi} = \frac{2\pi}{2\pi}\ Hz = 1\ Hz 
i.e. we insert the bare value of the angular velocity in the relation between the the ordinary frequency and the angular velocity, and the output is in Hz. Another way to write the same is:
:\nu = \frac{\omega}{2\pi}\cdot\frac{Hz}{rad/s} = \frac{2\pi\ rad/s}{2\pi}\cdot\frac{Hz}{rad/s} = 1\ Hz 
where the units rad/s and Hz are used explicitly in the formula. 2.110.114.86 (talk) 22:33, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 1
Talk:Radiation-dominated era

message: The article says that the radiation-dominated era lasted 380,000 years (i.e. until the formation of the CMB).
But Timeline of the Big Bang places the end of the radiation-dominated era at 70,000 years.
Eroica (talk) 15:11, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The value should be about 47,000 years, the text notes that the time of decoupling is "often mistaken" for this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgeDishman (talk • contribs) 00:08, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of the Radiation-Dominated Era 

message: This article gives an equation for the scale factor of a radiation-dominated universe, but it doesn't state any of the assumptions used to derive this simple equation.  In its current form, that equation can be incorrectly interpreted.  I don't have time to fix it right now, but chapter 19 of the book "Theoretical Concepts in Physics" by M.S. Longair (most of it is on google books) explains cosmological parameters, such as the scale factor, in different cosmological models.--Kris1284x (talk) 23:50, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scale factor equation
Talk:Jack Greenwell

message: During the time Greenwall was coach at RCD Espanyol, the club was know as RCD Español. Djln --Djln 14:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RCD Español

message: During the time Greenwall was coach at RCD Espanyol, the club was know as RCD Español. Djln --Djln 14:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RCD Español
Talk:Radiation flux

message: The topic seems notable as such, but the article is too specialized. The concept of radiation flux is not limited to radioactivity, it can be applied to any kind of radiation (e.g. electromagnetic, sound, etc.). I will change the tags accordingly. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 12:22, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Radio window

message: The opening of the article states "The radio window is a range of frequencies of electromagnetic radiation that penetrate the earth's atmosphere. This window is significantly wider than the optical and infrared windows."  If one defines the window as "a range of frequencies" then the statement that it is "significantly wider" is expected to mean that it has a wider bandwidth.  This is patently not true; the radio window has a bandwidth less than .  The optical window has a bandwidth of around .  The radio window is wider in terms of wavelengths, but where is that important?  Frequency bandwidth, on hte other hand is important in communications because that sets the information transfer rate.  In any case the article did not say wavelength.
Does the cited source actually say this directly, or is it something being inferred?  The only sense in which the radio window is wider is logarithmically, that is, number of octaves or decades.  That may be important to astronomers in some way (I don't know, not my field) but I can't see how.  It doesn't provide better imaging; the longer wavelengths mean a poorer resolution than the visible band. SpinningSpark 10:39, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello and thank you for your most accurate and totally right comments. Indeed, the source I cited [Chaisson, McMillan - Astronomy Today-Pearson (2014), p.114] suggests the radio window is wider than the optical in terms of wavelength range and more specifically when plotted logarithmically, however for some reason I skipped this note. The reason why this feature could be important to radio astronomy eludes me, but the sentence should nevertheless be erased from the article's introduction since it is quite misleading! Thank you again, and if you can, have a look at the related articles I recently updated/created (Optical window, Atmospheric window, Window (optics))--L'OrfeoGreco (talk) 20:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for fixing that.  I've now managed to see the book at IA.  Basically, the radio window is wider because they have drawn it wider, not because it actually is. SpinningSpark 09:24, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Radio window wider than optical window?
Talk:Radioisotope piezoelectric generator

message: "...  Thus, a battery using this isotope might continue to supply useful energy for at least half that time.  ..."
This statement should require a link, or at the very least the 'Thus" should be the culmination ion of some preceding logic building up to the claim.
Suggesting that eome device powered by a radioisotope might provide useful power for about half the radioisotopes half life merely on the basis that the word half can be found in both parts should not appear in a respectable reference.
If i am missing some more salient point, please make my error clear.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by BGriffin (talk • contribs) 22:24, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsubstantiated conjecture
Talk:Radioluminescence

message: The last edit of this article added a link to an external site offering some weird sort of product. The origin of the site is italian and the link was added from an italian IP. The link does not provide any information within the scope of the article. I consider this as SPAM. The only external link in the article for "waveguide" links to the same site, as well as the second link in the "balanced line" article. --213.39.213.133 (talk) 02:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Gone. --ssd (talk) 05:07, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Self-powered lighting covers pretty much exactly the same subject as this article, thus it seems completely logical to merge. I personally feel that a merge this way (i.e. Self-powered lighting into Radioluninescence makes more sense, as 'radioluminescence strikes me as the more correct term. Any other opinions? If not, I aim to be bold and merge the two (without losing any information) within the next few days. TalkIslander 19:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from Self-powered lighting
Talk:Fritz Bayerlein

message: A bit longer than a Stub, but needs references, infobox, picture if possible... and expansion, if possible. LordAmeth 16:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MILHIST Assessment

message: The article on Erwin Rommel almost seems to suggest that Rommel knew Bayerlein was part Jewish. Was that the case? 70.20.169.235 (talk) 03:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: He would have cared less if he had known. Rommel at times gave lip service to the Nazi anti-Semitic party line, but he didn't hate Jews. Jsc1973 (talk) 06:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Erwin Rommel

message: What does "from his illness in Africa" mean?  He died from an illness caught in Africa, perhaps?119.224.100.246 (talk) 01:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death
Talk:Rate of heat flow

message: This should probably be merged with heat transfer or some other article.  I've added some relevant things to what links here. Redirects should be created for things like heat transfer rate and heat flow rate, but I thought I'd wait to see about merging first.  If I don't get around to it, maybe somebody else with more expertise in the area will pick up the ball and come up with a sensible, cross-linked system. Gene Nygaard (talk) 04:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with some other article

message: "Heat is the flow of thermal energy driven by thermal non-equilibrium, so that 'heat flow' is a redundancy "
I don't think this is correct. Page Heat says:
"heat is energy in transfer to or from a thermodynamic system"
Ie: According to that page, "heat" is a special name for energy under a particular circumstance, which is during transfers of a particular kind. It is not a name for the transfer, per se.
If you accept that, then "heat flow" simply means "flow of specially-named energy". Gwideman (talk) 15:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Heat flow" is probably not redundant
Talk:Craig

message: A brief note on a change I made to this page.  The case Craig v. Boren, which established the current standard for judging sex discrimination in the United States, is general referred to by the single name "Craig," so I added it to the list.  Feel free to change the section title.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.36.79.152 (talk) 19:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Craig v. Boren

message: Why does this page only include people with the surname 'Craig' instead of also including people with the given name?  All the other name articles have examples of both.-PassionoftheDamon 07:47, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Certainly not all the other name articles: It would be too time-consuming to compile such lists, and they would be much too long and therefore pointless. This, however, may help you. <KF> 02:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's rather besides the point.  Nobody is saying there should be an all inclusive list.  Certainly, though, the list should include examples of prominent persons with the given name, just as other articles on names do.-PassionoftheDamon 02:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I'm not sure that makes a lot of sense -- for this or any other article. Of course, if you're talking about individuals who are known by their first name alone, then of course, they should be on the list. For example, some of the supermodels, or the musician Donovan. And I suppose it makes sense if it's a very unusual first name (perhaps). Is there an existing WP guideline on this? Cgingold 15:15, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All I wanted was to be of assistance because I thought you were looking for someone particular whose first name is Craig. However, if that's "rather besides the point," then please tell me what the point is of having "examples of prominent persons with the given name" in this article. <KF> 15:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname/Given name

message: Craig Electronics redirects to this page, there is no page for Craig Electronics. Probably a bug. 166.166.213.227 (talk) 13:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Craig Electronics
Talk:Israel Arts and Science Academy

message: This article needs to be checked for syntax and grammar.--79.179.129.238 15:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar and Syntax 

message: Hi, I am from IASA, and I study in the art department. We study modern and classic art history and also a variety of practical classes, such as photografing, painting, sculpting, video art, and mixed art classes. In the and of owr last year in the school we present the creations we made during the three years, plus an academic theoretical project. I think it's importemt to mantion that in the 2007 the department of spririt sciences will come to act. 
I believe you should also write something about the Projects Week - when all classes are stoped for 10 days in order to allowd the students to deal with a project they have choisen. In the first year students can choose any subject they like, in the second year the scienctists work on their a spacial sceince project and the artists work on their theoretical work. In our sinior year the scientists finish their projects and the artist work on their art works for the final ekhibition. I can't write it oneself becouse I don't write so well in english. I would like if one of you will write the infermetion I wrote here in the article. Thanks! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.219.228.172 (talk) 08:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the art department 
Talk:Shaded Red

message: Could someone give more info on Indio?--Granpire Viking Man 14:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Coprinus comatus

message: The Mycological characteristics box resolves to an image called :Image:Saprotrophic ecology icon.png which does not exist.--MichaelMaggs 14:47, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing image

message: Discuss at Talk: Coprinus. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Peter G Werner (talk • contribs) 19:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into Coprinus article? 

message: The picture Coprinus_comatus_(Shaggy_mane)_in_Hyderabad_W_IMG_0389.jpg‎ most probably shows a different species, Podaxis pistillaris. Should be removed here.
Lycop (talk) 16:34, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and have removed the pic. Sasata (talk) 16:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyderabad-Pic probably not C. comatus
Talk:Coalition for the Prevention of Alcohol Problems

message: This is an important organization and it shouldn't be deleted.Chris Longoria 14:48, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

message: The source of this Wikipedia entry is “Temperance Movement Groups and Leaders.” from which the material in bold was taken. That source is now properly identified.David Justin 15:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: The NYT article briefs and business article removed from the main article are probably more appropriately listed on the talk page for assistance in determining notability and adding information:
*http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C01EED91039F932A25757C0A960958260
*http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0DE3D91539F937A1575AC0A9649C8B63
*http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9A04E5D61739F930A35756C0A960958260
Flowanda | Talk 22:34, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed NYT links moved to talk page
Talk:Nordkapp

message: Did the municipality use a different coat of arms before 1973? --Eleassar my talk 14:52, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Active ingredient

message: active pharmaceutical ingredients
Added section on standardization of herbal medicine products where the very concept of "active ingredient" is controversial since most phytopharmaceuticals rely upon constituent synergy for their activities.  Plants with assumed active constituents like ginsenosides or hypericin may not correlate with the strength of the herbs.  Many herbs are poorly characterized or while well-characterized will rely upon the synergy of otherwise week principles.  Ksvaughan2 18:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Added

message: What are the ingredients in Vicodin  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.171.62 (talk) 03:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vicodin 

message: It seems a shame there's no inert ingredient article at the moment, despite there being this active ingredient one, wouldn't you agree? After all, there are these 18 WP articles that refer to "inert ingredient". 
There's inactive ingredient, which just redirects to excipient.  
I would create one, but feel I lack the subject-knowledge.
Trafford09 (talk) 20:30, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inert ingredient 

message: If any LR grade material passed all test as per Pharmacopoeia, can we claim it for pharmacopeial staus?
Can we use this material for use in Pharmaceutical industry as an ingredient?
please suggest ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.59.79.100 (talk) 03:47, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we use LR grade material as an API in pharmacetical product?
Talk:Hong Xiguan

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to Hong Xiguan. Consensus that the pinyin spelling is both the WP:COMMONNAME and preferable under WP:NCZH. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 15:17, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hung Hei-gun → ? – I propose the article be moved to either "Hung Hei-kwun" (the Cantonese spelling) or "Hong Xiguan" (the modern Mandarin spelling in pinyin). The current title, "Hung Hei-gun", uses the outdated Wade-Giles system (WP:NCZH). Although this figure is from Hong Kong, it seems like the Cantonese spelling is the least common of the three, so I vote for Hong Xiguan. SilverStar54 (talk) 16:19, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 28 June 2023
Talk:DoRo Productions

message: Material of what I would consider a controversial nature was added in this set of edits by an anonymous editor. This was removed, but subsequently reinstated by what I suspect was the same person.
This material makes a number of entirely uncited and unreferenced allegations against the owners of DoRo. In addition, the tone and editorial comments are blatantly POV.
As far as I'm concerned, this is entirely unacceptable by Wikipedia's standards. Given the partisan nature of the material, I feel it's better to remove it entirely. Some of these facts might (or might not) be true, but if they warrant inclusion it would be better to start from scratch in a less partisan manner. Ubcule (talk) 18:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of highly questionable and POV-toned material
Talk:Pullman porter

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File: will be appearing as picture of the day on February 21, 2020. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2020-02-21. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:42, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:{{Remove file prefix|Pullman dining car 1894.jpg}}]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: Hello, I added 2-3 sentences that provide a little background information on why Pullman porters decided to unionize. that I thought was relevant. While it may seem intuitive why all workers want to unionize, it is important to state the labor issues specific to these workers. Anoell (talk) 18:52, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional info under unionization
Talk:Qeqertaq

message: My inuit is a bit rusty, but doesn't name name mean "thumb" ?
Kalle 15:23, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: thumb?
Talk:Ghetto (Akon song)

message: The Genre of this music is difficult to verify. D@rk talk 19:24, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 

message: they both died in 1996/1997, and the single was released in 2004...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Llamarama16 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notorious B.I.G. and 2Pac Remix 

message: Did akon steal this song from Nitty Kutchie? Or payed him? Or was Akon first with it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.166.19.204 (talk) 12:30, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nitty Kutchie 

message: What city of New Jersey did it take place in? He lived in Newark and Union City, and Newark has the worse reputation and is the less dense of the two, so I assume it's Newark, but I just want to confirm.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Checkmatechamp137 (talk • contribs) 05:07, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where Exactly Did It Take Place?
Talk:Jesse White Tumbling Team

message: Today while making some redirects to this page I stumbled across another version of this page on a mispelled wikiarticle page.  The other article was created about 2 weeks before mine and has many additional relevant details.  I, (TonyTheTiger, and the other page's author, BLuToRsE, seem to like to seem to take pride in noting our page creations (see both user pages).  Since I posted on the correctly spelled page one thought is that his additional details should be added to my page and his page should become a redirect with both histories remaining.  The other take is that since he posted a more detailed page and posted earlier my page should be deleted and his page should be moved with a redirect at his incorrectly spelled page location.  Of course, I am in favor of the former.  It also may be the right thing to do given internet domain name protocol.  Wikipedia may have its own protocol however. TonyTheTiger 15:31, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fine with the merge. --BLuToRsE 18:49, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ...and make it look a bit cleaner, like dividing it into sections. --BLuToRsE 12:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'll clean this up later today...
Category talk:Genocide

message: There is no reference to the ethnic cleansing that has been happening in Palestine since 1947, and neither can I find an overall article summarizing this genocide, there is only the individual articles pointing to each of the separate atrocities, as if they were isolated incidents that do not form part of an ongoing genocide.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.244.0.9 (talk) 11:09, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: What is happening there is not a Genocide since the Palestinian Population is increasing. I respect your ideas, but it doesn't add up to an actual Genocide.Dunutubble (talk) 23:17, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Palestine

message: There is a dispute on Ukrainian Holocaust over the scope of this category. User:Aecis insists on categorizing the article (which briefly examines the uses of the term "Ukrainian Holocaust" in scholarly discourse) as part of the said category (although Holodomor itself is not included in :Category:Genocide). He ponders: Where does it say that :Category:Genocide should only contain articles about genocides? If it did, it would have been called :Category:Genocides, not Category:Genocide. The category contains many articles, all somehow relating to the concept of genocide. Some on actual genocides, some for instance on notable books. Does the term Ukrainian Holocaust cover a belief that Holodomor was a genocide? Is the :Category:Genocide for such articles? Since the term is very controversial, as applied to the Soviet hunger of 1932-33, and the parties to the dispute may not be entirely impartial, I request your opinions whether, considering our categorization guidelines, :Category:Genocide should include events whose classification as genocide is widely disputed and (as in the present case) the articles discussing alternative names of such events.  --Ghirla -трёп- 08:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments

message: Shouldn't this Category be merged to :Category:Genocides, which already exists. Editor2020 (talk) 01:38, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Why is the Kalergi Plan here? It's just a White Nationalist Conspiracy Theory; not much else.Dunutubble (talk) 23:19, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kalergi Plan 

message: The systematic ethnic cleansing and other crimes against humanity are all genocide, right? can we add it to the card for the series on genocide in either the WW2 section or the early 20th century? MRFring (talk) 19:33, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese Crimes Against Humanity