lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Content labeling proposal

message: (new header added for editing convenience)
I've been persuaded that my comments were not useful, so I've removed them from this very large page. I shall allow this discussion to proceed uninterrupted. — Xiong熊talk* 06:31, 2005 May 7 (UTC)
Let's start with point #3.  Please cite some of this truckload of evidence.  Note that I'm specifically asking about instances where wikipedia is currently blocked due to the inappropriateness of its content, NOT examples of inappropriate content.  -- Rick Block 18:37, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: So if someone placed it on the Evolution, Communism, Islam and Arab-Israeli conflict becuase they didn't want kids to see NPOV articles about those topics that would be fine? Thryduulf 09:37, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Errrm I guess you can get 10 out of 10 for simplicity? Could well work too... -- Tomhab 23:15, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this needed?
Talk:New York City Fire Department

message: Organization of the New York City Fire Department has way too much unencyclopedic detail, and much of the encyclopedic content is already included here. Recommend merging it into this article. -Apocheir (talk) 23:51, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Organization of the New York City Fire Department]] 

message: This ranks table is wider than the rest of the text in this article, causing this entire  page to shrink on device screen. Please, adjust the table. Thank you, --Ooligan (talk) 20:33, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FDNY ranks table issue.
Talk:Sebastião Salgado

message: Sebastião Salgado is also the creator of Instituto Terra, a NGO deticated on the preservation of "Mata Atlãntica".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Souza (talk • contribs) 16:54, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instituto Terra 
Talk:Joseph Klausner

message: According to Library of Congress Authorities, "Joseph Klausner" was the usage in the 1925 English translation of his book Jesus of Nazareth. According to Google, it is the current usage in English in ivy-league dissertations, University of Heidelberg press releases, The New Republic, Commentary, etc. In contrast, "Joseph Gedalja Klausner" is a German-language transliteration with 52 Google hits total, and only 6 among English-language web pages. Klausner's niece says that his doctoral application, which was written in German at the University of Heidelberg, is signed "Jossel Klausner" rather than "Joseph Gedalja Klausner". --Hoziron 04:16, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I don't think the long quote from the doctoral dissertation is suitable. Verbatim/block quotes would be indicated only if the speaker is so famous that every word is worth citing, in which case the author is likely to be more notable than Prof Klausner. I suggest it is removed/paraphrased/shortened. JFW | T@lk 20:06, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long quote 
Talk:Intergalactic space

message: Why do we assume that all of the IGM is warm to hot?
 
http://www.as.itb.ac.id/APRIM2005/abs_on_web/10018/10018.html
 
If hydrogen clouds can be cool enough to become molecular within the confines of a galaxy, why does it necessarily follow that it is in a plasma state between galaxies?
:I think that it's inferred from radio astronomy. See Intergalactic plasma by Grote Reber (1986). See also, The X-Ray Emission of a Hot Dense Intergalactic Plasma by J. Bergeron (1970).
:That doesn't mean that there are no cold clouds, only that some warm to hots clouds have been inferred. --Iantresman 21:24, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temperature. 

message: It's a pretty empty article for such a large space....--Occono 14:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this all there is? 

message: The first paragraph says its 3 Kelvin, and the third paragraph says its millions of Kelvin? 76.19.173.43 03:31, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temperature
Talk:Metre per second squared

message: We're learning about m/s/s in the eighth grade here, and here would be America. We don't use the metric system [though we should here] but in my physical science book it is noted as "meter per second per second" or "meter per second squared". Sean  (talk || contribs| esperanza)) 16:32, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  8th Grade Opinion 

message: # A measurement of acceleration can be a scalar or a vector, but not both.  Therefore, it's better to use "or" in the relevant sentence.
# Newton's second law is the statement F=ma.  The statement 1 N = 1 kg · m s-2 is a special case, or example, of Newton's second law.
# Quotation marks are for quoting, not emphasis.
::Spacepotato 06:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phrasing of article 

message: I propose to delete the second paragraph of the current version. It rambles onto other matters and will just be a source of confusion to the reader. The first paragraph says all that needs to be said. Any comments? Xxanthippe 22:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete second paragraph 

message: Acceleration is not a base or named derived unit in the International system of units.  Many kind of quantities (in fact, almost any you can think of) can be expressed in the SI units - that's what they were designed for.  Only a handful of those quantities have their own named units in SI. Thearticle is false inthat sense, and misleading.  I've therefore nominated it for deletion. Sbalfour (talk) 21:59, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bogus article 

message: Difinitin 119.152.59.49 (talk) 17:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  M/s-2
Talk:Signal (IPC)

message: Link 13 is dead.
2003:C7:4F29:8A05:4ECC:6AFF:FE93:1F63 (talk) 12:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Link dead

message: "A process's execution may result in the generation of a hardware exception, for instance, if the process attempts to divide by zero or incurs a TLB miss."
Which architectures generate an exception on a TLB miss? x86 and x86_64 CPUs certainly don't (note: page fault != TLB miss).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.188.254.195 (talk) 12:00, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: MIPS 1. Bomazi (talk) 00:56, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The comments opposing the merging in the above proposal haven't addressed my main concern about violations of Wikipedia guidelines WP:OR, WP:N and WP:NOT. A second discussion was started  here, it seems that the consensus for the merge is unanimous. 1exec1 (talk) 15:02, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging the individual signal pages: 2nd try

message: SIGWINCH became a POSIX signal in Oct 2017:
 0001151: Introduce new signal SIGWINCH and functions tcsetsize(), tcgetsize() to get/set terminal window size
2601:14A:600:6420:F128:9801:9970:9A2A (talk) 11:49, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  SIGWINCH became a POSIX signal in Oct 2017 

message: I placed a citation needed tag on this claim: Signals are similar to interrupts, the difference being that interrupts are mediated by the CPU and handled by the kernel while signals are mediated by the kernel (possibly via system calls) and handled by individual processes. A source is necessary because both the claim and the reasoning are vague . My research indicates that signals are the UNIX implementation of interrupts, not just similar to interrupts. For example, the textbook The Design of the UNIX Operating System by Bach (1986; pages 200-201) classifies signals into 7 categories. The categories are when a process finishes normally, when a process has an error exception, when a process runs out of a system resource, when a process executes an illegal instruction, when a process sets an alarm event, when a process is aborted from the keyboard, and when a process has tracing alerts for debugging. Every category generates an interrupt. Timhowardriley (talk) 20:28, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship between signal and interrupt
Talk:Court Jew

message: Parts of this article are written very strangely, as if translated from another language.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.162.130.233 (talk) 17:17, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi. The article reads "the first examples of what would be called Court Jews emerged during the Renaissance"
This can't be true because any of the people in the category 'Court Jews' lived before the Renaissance. I will attempt an edit but it can probably be improved. 
Dobtoronto oh let me try this four tildes thing Dobtoronto (talk) 15:37, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Templar Knights where the middle ages bankers, as well as run the entire empire. It could be the "court jew" were knights of jewish ancestry. This why the Rothschilds are known as the vatican's banker, and why the de / knight. The court jews also run corporate world, and the media, as the knights and others evagelics-knight (Rupert Muradoch) and muslim-knight (king Abdola). He then changes his name refelect his jews convesion red sheild to that of the jolly roggers of the templar.174.125.79.206 (talk) 03:14, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: KT were the money changers run the holy roman empire71.3.199.175 (talk) 02:10, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Spoken like a Klansman. NRPanikker (talk) 11:52, 29 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Templar Knights

message: Tone of article is suspect - even discounting the times this page has been vandalized by antisemites, there is insufficient evidence in existence to prove that Jewish economic practices significantly differed from that of their nonJewish counterparts. Furthermore, the entire article is written in a tone that implies that the Jewish community in general lived in economic prosperity, when this was not the case - court Jews were the exception for a reason. 66.152.106.102 (talk) 01:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What evidence do you have? What I see, is an article that talks about the  of Jews, who were . Specific examples, please. Mathglot (talk) 09:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Tone
Talk:Courts of Denmark

message: Hello,
For some random reason which I forget :-), I am the creator of this image:
The article indicates that the court system experienced changes at the beginning of 2007; however, the data in the diagram is older than that.  If this image is still correct, can someone please add it back into the article; otherwise, tell me how it needs to be updated and I will upload a corrected version.  Cheers, bdesham ★ 20:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, a few years later, but here is an updated graphic (in Danish): http://www.domstol.dk/om/organisation/organisationsdiagram/Pages/default.aspx . The main structure is unchanged, but there are more details in this graphic, and the "County Courts" are now called "District Courts" in English (and there are fewer of them). It is a bit of a balance how much info to put into a simple graphic like this one. I would probbly remove the Special Court of Appeals, and add the court systems (not entire structure) of Greenland and the Faroe Islands.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by NisJørgensen (talk • contribs) 10:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy of the image
Talk:Language center

message: ==Untitled==
Why haven't y'all kickass neurologist Wikipedians made this article nonstub?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guugolpl0x (talk • contribs) 17:43, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seriously, WTF? 

message: Why haven't y'all kickass neurologist Wikipedians made this article nonstub?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guugolpl0x (talk • contribs) 17:43, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Golgi apparatus

message: intro says 1898, discovery chapter says 1910, both giving the same reference [2] 46.232.229.52 (talk) 08:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for noticing this. You are correct about there being a contradiction – the cited source makes no mention of it being named after Golgi in 1898, or of him discovering it in 1897. I have now corrected the lead to fit the source cited. The Discovery section already accurately reflected the source. Toadspike [Talk] 10:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  contradiction in first naming
Talk:PFR (band)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 17:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 January 2022
Talk:WindTunnel with Dave Despain

message: Um, last I checked, Wikipedia was not WindTunnel. This is an article about WindTunnel. There is no evidence that Dave Despain reads this talk page and gets fan input from it. I've removed the letters to Dave. If an admin disagrees, put them back. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 00:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Monoenergism

message: Monoenergism would be that Christ has two natures and one energy, as opposted to monothelitism which is two natures and one united will. Exactly what an energy is, I'm not sure. Is it the operation/energy (energeiai?) of the will, or is it something else? This page is clearly confused with Monothelitism, but I don't know what to change it into. 68.171.249.134 19:51, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Every sentence in this account, save one (on the Chalcedonian context of monoenergism), is erroneous or contains error. Monoenergism is not 'often paired' with monophysitism but with monotheletism. It was neither suggested by Heraclius or ever adopted by him. The meaning of the term was not 'left deliberately vague', but had a clear meaning deriving from Dionysius the Areopagite (and his expression 'a new theandric operation').It was not accepted by the patriarchs of Antioch or Constantinople. Heraclius could not 'abandon' monoenergism since he had never embraced it, and neither did he 'declare the doctrine of monotheletism', though it is true that his Ekthesis of 638 (concerned to exclude any definition of the number of energies or operations in Christ) takes unity of will in Christ for granted. Finally, the formal condemnation of monoenergism and monotheletism occurred not in 680 but in 681. RP 28.11.2012.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.81.87.7 (talk) 08:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors galore 

message: The warning "contradict-other|Monothelitism" has been appended at the top of the article page, and an inline warning "Contradict-inline|article=Monothelitism" has been appended to the phrase "Monoenergism was [not] accepted by Pope Honorius I", because in contrast with article Monothelitism, in particular sections First attempt: Doctrine of One Energy, Condemnation of Monothelitism and Controversy over Pope Honorius I.Miguel de Servet (talk) 20:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.  Esoglou (talk) 14:45, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contadiction with article on Monothelitism
Talk:National Socialist Motor Corps

message: Shouldn't the German name for the organization be mentioned? john k 21:07, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent point.  I added this name as well as the alternate name of "Drivers Corps". -Husnock 21:12, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper Name 
Talk:Camillo Sivori

message: From the article:
:Sivori's playing was renowned for its thrilling pyrotechnic spectacle.
That must have looked quite impressive. Rl 21:46, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: LOL - If he were alive today he probably would have used dry ice and a disco ball! Seriously, its always hard to describe sounds, so visual images must suffice. I sometimes wonder what these guys would have done if rock music had been invented. They probably would have played electic guitar and joined Van Halen. Paradiso 22:58, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rideau Club

message: I read this unusual article by Quebec botanist Jacques Rousseau about an alleged Masonic influence at the Rideau Club. It would be interesting if anyone could look into these allegations about the Club being linked to secret societies.  ADM (talk) 08:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: You are quite correct in noting it is an "unusual" article. I see no reference to the Rideau Club in the blog entry you link, which purports (possibly correctly) to be an article written by Professor Rousseau in 1963 in a Quebec journal called Verite ("Truth"). 
Certainly, the blog post does speak about power in Ottawa, and make accusations that it rests disproportionately with Anglophones, and Freemasons (who may or may not be Anglophones; this is unclear, but perhaps it is my poor French that is to blame. I have read it carefully, though). 
As a social club involving Ottawa elites, (I suspect much weaker in the Diefenbaker era, given his Western base) the Rideau Club, could, I suppose, be assumed to be part of some Ottawa-centric Freemason conspiracy, but this seems thin gruel, and decidedly improbable on all counts.
Indeed, the very openness on religion in the 1950's and gender in the 1960's/1970's hardly suggest a closed, conspiratorial organization. 
I hope my response has been helpful. Holmwood (talk) 00:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Freemasonry
Talk:First Special Service Force

message: "all regiments were in the 1st Company" i am no expert but I always thought a company is smaller than a regiment? 46.15.119.11 (talk) 18:58, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made a change there, which might improve the understanding.Tennisedu (talk) 20:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  company > regiment ? 

message: The article states that "Furthermore, attacks on Norwegian power stations, which supplied the country with 49% of its power, might drive the Axis powers out of the country and give the Allies a direct link to Russia.” Norway only supplied 49% of its own power?
I assume “the country” here is Norway. That could benefit from some gentle disambiguation.
Is this what the cited source says? (For convenience, that source is Nadler, John (2005). A Perfect Hell. Canada: Anchor Canada. p. 28. ISBN 978-0-385-66141-6.)
Or might the source refer to a particular subset of Norwegian power stations, e.g. hydroelectric plants?
There’s been more than enough time for change, but this is strikingly different from the current situation reported here (Energy in Norway), in which 99% of Norway’s electricity is hydroelectric, and Norway is a net exporter.
Jdickinson (talk) 09:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a copy of Nadler, and the relevant passage is on P.27. The context is incorrect as you quote it, the planned attack was not upon ALL Norwegian power stations but on a few (14) which would be vulnerable to the special attack force equipped with the new snow vehicles, and those power stations which were targeted accounted for 49% of Norwegian power capacity (presumably from all sources, not just hydro).
Here is the quote from Nadler, "...Pyke's plan to neutralize Norway as an "economic asset" to the Germans by unleashing snow commandos and their armor against the fourteen (14) Norwegian electric power stations that generated 49 percent of the country's power." Tennisedu (talk) 16:01, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Norwegian Power Output? 

message: A quick question, when the france campaign starts for the forcemen, it mentions the force is brought up to 2,000 men by recruitment, where are these recruits coming from? Are they rangers or 10th Mountain? Or are they men who went through the same process as the other forcemen but much later, I dont think they'd let some random GI Joe into an elite alpine unit with no special forces training, would love to find an answer. Maxthedogedude2279 (talk) 21:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recruitment.
Talk:Zhang Fei

message: I dont get how Zhang Fei was able to scare off more than a 1000 man army. I mean they could have gained up on him, or shot him with an arrow.
Though I must give credit to him for being so loyal to his brothers. Like the time Liu Bei was in trouble at Chang Ban, When Zhang Fei, warded off men, if he did.
The thing I think about is that if Zhang Fei wouldnt have drank so much, he would have probably would have stil live through the Battle of Fan Castle.
May we all remember the history that he made on that day in Fan Castle.
Whopper 23:51, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I dont know

message: The historical/factual portion of this article is quite short for such a major figure in Chinese history. Considering my background in classical Japanese history, I understand the difficulties in representing historical figures who are known primarily from works of fiction and chronicles which, while based in fact, may exaggerate dramatically the details. Nevertheless, this article could benefit greatly from some cleanup and expansion; the fictional part seems more detailed, thorough, and better-organized than the "main" factual/historical portion. LordAmeth 01:33, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move —Mets501 (talk) 04:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:MilHist Assessment
Talk:Beaver Lake (Arkansas)

message: You state the electricity-generating capacity ("power") of Beaver Dam to be "6,347,345 MWHR".
First, what is an "MWHR"? I can't find it anywhere. I can find "MWh", but that's not a measurement of power (speed at which energy is produced). It's a measurement of the energy produced. So, if you have something that produces (or consumes) at a rate of 1 MW, and you run it for 1 hour, you will have put into (or taken out of) the electrical grid (or battery, whatever) an amount of electricity equal to 1 MWh of energy.
Second, the dam's power, if and when both turbines are running at their full 56 MW, would just be 2 X 56 MW or 112 MW. (All Corps of Engineer dams in the USA put together are 21,000 MW. The Little Rock Division's dams, all put together, are 1,068 MW. See
http://pacesetterlive.dodlive.mil/2015/07/06/generating-interest-in-southwestern-division-hydropower/
.) Hoover dam is 2,080 MW according to WikiP.
So, if 112 MW = 6,347,345 MWHR, then this "HR" thing is not a unit but, rather, is a number, equal to 112/6,347,345, so that in converting MWHR to the more recognizable MW we get 112 MW. A(Alternatively "MWHR" is a unit, equal to 112/6,347,345 of a megawatt.)
But it'd be simpler just to say "112 MW" than to use a unit ("MWHR") that nobody has ever heard of.
Third, from what SOURCE does "6,347,345 MWHR" come from? What country was it written in, and why do they use units that are sort of non-standard for Wikipedia? Please provide a source. And give the source a CRITICAL READING first, to make sure that it's a source whose CONTENT makes it credible. (Not a source made credible by "attribution to authority" or something exterior to its content, which, if not making sense, should impeach it.)2604:2000:C682:B600:4A9:1C47:C70A:4A54 (talk) 10:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: What is an MWHR?
Talk:Panania

message: Can you confirm the source of the claim that the origin of the name Panania is Aboriginal? Narwee, several stations up the line is supposed to be an Aboriginal word for "sun", so I can't see how Panania can mean "sun rising in the east and shining on hills" - which Aboriginal dialect is the word supposedly derived from? I have a sneaking suspicion that many of the "Aboriginal" suburb names in southwestern Sydney are pure inventions - particularly given that by the time those suburbs were named there had been no local Aborigines there for many decades.--Gene_poole 23:18, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled