lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Triple play (telecommunications)

message: cant find any reference to Freedom Online and FDD, as stated in the wireless section. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.122.11.131 (talk) 05:49, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 2001:4454:678:500:C5D2:8D95:BE7C:B640 (talk) 22:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

text: 2001:4454:678:500:C5D2:8D95:BE7C:B640 (talk) 22:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

text: 2001:4454:678:500:C5D2:8D95:BE7C:B640 (talk) 22:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information source 

message: The current article pushes BPL as a very superior technology that is being delayed by the established market players. This is not true. There are several technological barriers to BPL that may never be resolved.
Namely:
The naked electric cables traveling over the air (on posts) are subject to interferences and broadcast a lot of noise.
The ramifications of the powerline network cause reflections that harm the signal.
Transformers, relays, transistors, and rectifiers block or degrade the signal.
The investment necessary to overcome these obstacles with the current technology would be enormous. Therefore, without several technological breakthroughs, this technology is at a disadvantage to DSL, Cable, and the emerging wireless standards.
BPL will most likely never reach mainstream acceptance. If anyone has the time to verify my claims with good sources and correct the article, it would be a great improvement to a very unbalanced text. 
edit: All these parts pushing BPL were added by a single user (142.177.8.48).
--nunocordeiro (talk) 13:58, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadband over Power Lines 

message: Should state the obvious, that the name comes from the triple play of American baseball. Is it even used outside of North America? But like most everything else in this article, that would be original research without a citation! W Nowicki (talk) 19:30, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Grandma Gatewood

message: Why no information about her later life and death? It is an article about the person, after all. I'm not familiar with Wikipedia Law, but it appears to be a biographical article, so the information would be appropriate. Is this due to lack of reliable sources, or is it an intentional thing intended to avoid invasion of privacy? AnnaGoFast (talk) 05:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Later life and death 

message: The page title of "Grandma Gatewood" looks unencyclopedic if not disrespectful (cf notorious headline "San Diego mother wins Nobel prize", for Maria Goeppert Mayer in 1967). It would be better if the title of this biography was her actual name. Grandma Gatewood could still be a re-route.--Wuerzele (talk) 23:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Changing at least the intro from "better known" to "known", because how is that better? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:07, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

text: When I hiked the AT in 1961, residents along the trail had some great Great Grandma Gatewood tales to share.Georgejdorner (talk) 20:07, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  page title unencyclopedic 

message: I propose to delete the following paragraph under Biography - Hiking career because I don't think it adds anything to the article, and I have not been able to find an original contemporaneous source for the quotation:
In 1970, at age 83, while visiting Appalachian Outfitters in Oakton, Virginia she was asked what she thought about the latest lightweight backpacking gear. Emma advised: "Make a rain cape, and an over the shoulder sling bag, and buy a sturdy pair of Keds tennis shoes. Stop at local groceries and pick up Vienna sausages... most everything else to eat you can find beside the trail... and by the way those wild onions are not called "Ramps"... they are "Rampions" ... a ramp is an inclined plane."[citation needed]
CMtemCA (talk) 17:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have deleted the paragraph. --CMtemCA (talk) 23:11, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed anecdote deletion - now deleted
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Psychogenes

message: KEEP and format Although this is not an actual known term, it is properly defined and basically it is coining a new term. As a clinical psychologist and dentist in SF, CA I would find it very useful in discussing certain areas of the human psyche. Wikipedia shall only thrive when it is inclusive of new, evolving terms. That is what makes english a very powerful language. It is inclusive, not exclusive. I have ascertained that the referenced work is published by Aakila Rose Publishing out of San Jose, CA and is scheduled for release April 1, 2007. And that one of the authors, doctor Salma Rashid, is the author of the article herein. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.194.88.167 (talk • contribs) 
: AfD discussion goes on the main project page, not the talk page.  I will copy this comment there for you, but please post new comments on the project page in the future.  Stebbins 21:41, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Nelson Pereira dos Santos

message: Library of Congress (http://lccn.loc.gov/2002011751) lists him under
*"Santos, Nelson Pereira dos"
which I take to be authoritative for the purpose of the English Wikipedia. At present his name is shown alternately as either "Pereira" or "dos Santos". I am changing these to LC's preferred form. Milkunderwood (talk) 22:11, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Form of name 
Talk:Certified software development professional

message: :Category:Software_engineering_professionalism has been merged to :Category:Software_engineering per this discussion. Please do not unilaterally act against earlier established consensus. And please explain your point in more detail. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category no longer exists 
Talk:Louis Schanker

message: I was trying to edit the infobox to include 
printmaker and sculptor but had difficulty
Any assistance would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Lounflo (talk) 03:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pan Pacific Open

message: There is a long, ongoing discussion at WP:Tennis about the tournament tables found in tennis articles on English-language Wikipedia (e.g., this type of table). The discussion is about whether the "official sponsored name" of a tournament - such as Pacific Life Open - or another tournament name without the sponsor - such as Indian Wells Masters - must be used in those articles. Please join the discussion here. Thanks.  Tennis expert (talk) 08:52, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for wider input on discussion at WikiProject Tennis
Talk:Wayne Michaels

message: * On 13 Mar 1007, user 90.224.178.149 added the following:
::He was born 1974 in Barnes, London but later moved because of his job.
::He moved in his early twenties to Uganda and bought himself a wife called Majbjörn. They divorced soon but got a child toghether, Ralf, whom they got shared custerdy on.
: The content did not feel credible, and a brief google couldn't corroborate the claims, so I removed it.  Fordsfords 21:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of fictional rapid transit stations

message: I've added a link to the West Ashfield tube station article in the "See also" template at the top of the "List of fictional London Underground stations" section. The station is not a real London Underground station, but is also not really fictional, as it it exists as a training facility, so I thought it would be a "see also", but feel free to add it into the list, if you think that is more appropriate. Big Mac (talk) 16:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  West Ashfield tube station 
Talk:USS Wabash (1855)

message: Upgraded page with newest ship infobox and added data to the box.
Added photo down in the text. (You may want to swap these two photos around...)
Minor ed to first para to describe career of ship.
Minor eds, fixex, etc.Wikited (talk) 16:50, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded page 

message: This article states: "She was based on the same plans as Colorado." Uh, as Wabash was laid down first, shouldn't it be the other way around (and mentioned in the Colorado article)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.51.66.32 (talk) 13:21, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colorado
Talk:Rocky Butte

message: I think Rocky Butte is a Oregon State Park. Can anyone confirm, and should this be mentioned in the article? LinguistAtLarge (talk) 05:02, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a city park, Joseph Wood Hill Park. tedder (talk) 15:23, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  State park 

message: I just removed a duplicate image from the article's prose. The same image was being used in the infobox, so feel free to replace with another if you'd like. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:29, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate image
Talk:C-Block

message: I added it because the article is all over the place in terms of its information. It has a lot of red links, as well as links to stub articles. Google searches turn up very little, and so I wondered if there is anybody out there who knows anything about these artists and might be able to re-write or amend this article as necessary. The Baroness of Morden (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I used to follow their music quite closely when they were around, they charted pretty well especially with their first two singles in GSA region and Scandinavia as well , . Unfortunately, I'm unable to find reliable sources even in German language, in other words, no matter how I try to revise the article, we are probably going to remain unsourced besides charts positions and gold/platinum certification. --Harout72 (talk) 05:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's true, the lack of accurate information on the internet is frustrating... never mind inaccurate information that some try to force. I'll be adding the singer of So Strung Out, Raquel Gomez-Ray to the article and some sources for which I can't guarantee accurate information. Listening on YouTube on some of her euro-dance-pop-whatever songs listed on those sites and based on how she pronounces the words in those songs compared to So Strung Out I can say with a 95% certitude that it's her. Em27 (talk) 22:08, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding "expert-verify" tag
Talk:Cenél nEógain

message: Why does this article look all messed up? What are the grey boxes and such? --AW 21:47, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was supposed to be an ASCII family tree I think. Rather than fix it, I've merged in the one from Cenel nEogain Family Tree as was suggested a while back. It needs a little bit of fiddling, but it's not too bad. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 23:01, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:R. Foster Winans

message: I took this out of the article:
:A similar storyline, about a Gatsby-like character (Brant) and his young admirer (Winans), drove Oliver Stone's hit 1987 film, Wall Street, which won Michael Douglas an Academy Award for his portrayal of a rapacious financier named Gordon Gekko.
Is there any evidence of any actual connection, like inspiration?  It seems like just a coincidence to me.  SnowFire 02:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wall Street, the movie. 

message: The link to: "Carpenter v. United States"  
in "Winans' conviction for violating securities law was affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1987 as Carpenter v. United States ..."
links to the wrong "Carpenter v. United States", probably because there are multiple cases with the same name.
It should link to something like: "Carpenter v. United States, 484 U.S. 19 (1987)".
Or, maybe it should not be a link at all?
How can we fix this?
Thanks,
WikipediaSq (talk) 05:41, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Casual reader here stopping in to say it got me, too. No need to have a link if Wikipedia doesn't have a page for that case. I ended up following the citation to read the case on Justia. 2603:3012:D00:9C00:B96F:6C04:BE3B:D5EC (talk) 00:35, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

text: Just fixed it :) 38.140.255.210 (talk) 20:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to wrong Supreme Court case
Talk:Camouflage (band)

message: Subsection M.I.N.E in the German Wikipedia.
Translated by Google Translator:
Together with his bandmates Jochen Schmalbach (drums) and Volker Hinkel (guitar), the camouflage singer Marcus Meyn, who is also the managing director of a telecommunications company for fiber optic technology, developed M.I.N.E. The idea came up during a Camouflage concert tour in October 2015.
M.I.N.E mixes the tried and tested with new styles: according to the band's own statements, M.I.N.E represents "a mixture of dark electronics and guitars, [...] between electro-wave, gothic and mainstream pop". The name is derived phonetically from the singer's surname and is supposed to stand for the musical collaboration of the musicians.
The band's first single, Things We've Done, was released on January 19, 2017. On February 17th of the same year the EP One followed, which in addition to Things We've Done contained the other titles Dangerous, Lean On and White Trash. In 2018, single releases from The One and Dangerous announced the album Unexpected Truth Within, which was released on May 25, 2018. The Remixed EP was released on February 16, 2019; In addition to a dance remix of the single The One by Ton Sur Ton and a remix of the single Dangerous by Daniel Myer and Smallboy, the EP also contains all remixes of the single Things We've Done (Daniel Myers Synthpop Remix, the "Stranger Things Remix" by 9inerrors and the "Paralyzed Remix" by Rico Hüllermeier) as well as an additional acoustic variant.
From 2016 concerts and festivals followed in Germany as well as tours in Germany and abroad; among others in Prague, Bratislava, Warsaw, Moscow, Volgograd, Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Argentina and Chile.
RIMOLA (talk) 17:30, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  M.I.N.E
Talk:Longhaired dutch shepherd

message: This page is obviously redundant to Dutch Shepherd Dog and should be merged. I would, but at the moment I'm a bit busy. --Pharaoh Hound (talk) (The Game) 21:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Could someone capitalise the "d" in Dutch in the title? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pwt898 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  capitalization
Talk:NE1000

message: The last paragraph of this article sums up my thoughts as to why this article should exist: these cards hold a notable place in the developmental history of network technology. EJSawyer 21:59, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Existance

message: 200px|ISA-16 bit with AUI + 10BASE2 Electron9 (talk) 18:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture found ;) 

message: Should this be renamed to NE1000?  As the earlier board, that's the one with the real innovation to it. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:26, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename? 

message: The article contained a claim that the NE2000 used/could use DMA. It used the source for the NetBSD driver to support this claim. If you look at the comments describing the function's purpose in that source, you'll see it exclusively says "using Programmed I/O". It does refer to DMA in inline comments. That's because DMA is the term used in the 8390 datasheet to refer to the mechanism by which the controller transfers data to and from the buffer memory; "local DMA" when referring to data passing between MAC and buffer, and "remote DMA" for data passing between buffer and host system. Whether the latter is actually implemented using DMA as the host sees it, is an implementation detail the datasheet only considers briefly. It notes that the architecture makes it possible to do so. It is a possibility, but not necessary, and not done on the NE2000. Think about it: if it did use ISA DMA, which channel does it use? That's a basic configuration aspect of an ISA card, and necessary to know when allocating resources. If it were not configurable, at least you'd need to know it to avoid allocating the same DMA channel to another card. You'll be hard pressed to find documentation saying an NE2000 occupies DMA channel 1 or 3 or whatever, because it simply does not. Digital Brains (talk) 13:58, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: But you've also stripped out one of the other refs. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Oh, you're right, I'm sorry. I've restored it. Digital Brains (talk) 14:53, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  No DMA 

message: This os23museum article tears down a NE2000 statement in this Wikipedia article, which I found at this ycombinator post.  Someone please fix this wikipedia article.  BTW, I'm not the author of the os2museum article!!  • Sbmeirow • Talk • 22:22, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like this has already been taken care of. The only remaining question I see is whether there was ever an NE2000 without AUI. Our article claims, without support, this was added in a B rev. Others seem to say it was always there. ~Kvng (talk) 13:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  NE2000 section needs editing
Talk:Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel (Mountain View, California)

message: Apparently there is a low-speed 120x80 wind tunnel at Nasa Ames, but this article doesn't seem to mention it.  I have a photo (as I'm sure is easily got, since I only drove past as a fluke)  Karora 11:24, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Low speed wind tunnel 

message: Tag in article indicates it is based on a NPS webpage that is "public domain".  I assume that as is the case for similar articles with similar tags, that means material in this article is cut and pasted, constituting plagiarism but not copyright violation.  I tagged article with "refimprove" and downrate to Stub for now.  Please improve the article by comparing carefully to source webpage, removing or quoting all copied phrases, so that removal of the NPS tag is justified.  Of course, if it is copied, having the NPS tag acknowledging that is better than asserting, implicitly, that the article does not include copied material.  It would be reasonable for an editor to blank the article and start over, IMHO, too, but editing the article to improve it would be better. doncram (talk) 23:16, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Editor Kudzuvine has created new articles on several other wind tunnels that are NHLs in Virginia.  I am now going to heavily rework this page, per comments above, and invite Kudzuvine's assistance. doncram (talk) 15:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: downrate and reference improvement
Talk:Jeremy Burgess

message: While it's true that Burgess' fame comes primarily from crew chief to Doohan and Rossi, something should also be added for his own racing career. There is a good article in this months Roadracing World about him, and his racing past. Caferace 02:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone must know about JB's future following Valentino's move to Ducati?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.152.76.137 (talk) 09:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2011
Talk:A Necessary Fiction

message: "Inaccuracies and errors" is a section I consider most illustrating, and I don't think it sustracts shine from the series. However, I have to point out that I think it is quite ridiculous to have such a copious section regarding the things that aren't factually right in the series, while lacking of a summary section which would have to constitute the most important part of the article. I think we should try to work on the actual episode before composing the "add-ons". --Espazolano 22:03, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, I could not disagree more.  The summary is useful for people who have acutally seen the episode, and should most certainly be included.  Showing only the "inaccuracies and errors" is incomplete, and the external links do not substitute for an actual article.  Magichands 00:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

message: This article fails to assert notability for the episode in question. Consider adding a response section or a production section and gathering some third party sources about the episode.--Opark 77 10:22, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Federal Financial Supervisory Authority

message: This sentence should be re-worded as the concept of naked short selling applies only to underlying securities, whereas credit default swaps are derivative instruments.Bmathis (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Naked short selling of credit default swaps" 

message: Just a thought. I've been reading about it and it's interesting, noteable stuff. Benevolent Prawn (talk) 01:33, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone out to write more about BaFin and Wirecard
Talk:Observation Hill

message: This page seems to have been superceded by Observation Hill (McMurdo Station). Should this one be deleted? Gmarsden 22:06, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks; I've turned it into a dab page. -- Eugène van der Pijll 09:19, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete Page?
Template talk:Volcanoes of Oregon

message: Continued from: User talk:Katr67#Oregon Volcanoes
Hi again, I've been thinking about this some more.  The "see also" sections are ugly, and don't serve a clear enough purpose as they stand now.  I think a good solution for providing links to other nearby volcanoes is to add a navigation box at the bottom, titled "Volcanoes of Oregon" which would list all those included in WP.  I think that about 50-60 of the Oregon volcanoes are signicant enough to be included in WP, either because of height or geology or just being well-known.  The nav box would be organized into geographic sections (e.g. Cascades, Boring Lava Field, Eastern Oregon, etc.) with volcanoes listed in some reasonable order (maybe north-south) within each section.  This would provide easy one-click navigation between any of those articles, and be nicely organized geographically which the :Category:Volcanoes of Oregon is not.
I may build the nav box when I have some time, maybe this weekend.--Seattle Skier 22:28, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good to hear back from you, I thought maybe you were upset with me. The navbox sounds like a great idea. 50-60 sounds like it would make a huge infobox though--it might dwarf some of the articles. Hopefully it won't be any bigger than the  template. I've never tried to format a navbox though, so I don't have any practical suggestions. Happy editing! Katr67 22:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, I was not upset, just ruminating what to do.  I'll try to keep the navbox less than half the height of the (huge)  template. And the volcano articles I started (and others) will have photos soon, I've taken good photos of most Oregon volcanoes (and any lookout towers present) over the years.  So the navbox will be less visually dominating if the article has a couple of photos. --Seattle Skier 23:35, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well ours might be huge, but check out the gargantuan ... Katr67 23:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Oooooh. Shiny! Katr67 05:58, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving discussion from [[User talk:Katr67|Katr67's talk page]]

message: The heading "Basin and Range" is a redirect to the general article Basin and range topography. Should this link in fact be piped to  Basin and Range Province? Colonies Chris (talk) 10:56, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It definitely should, I'm going to go ahead and change that.--Amateria1121 (talk) 15:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basin and Range
Talk:Allied characters of Command & Conquer

message: This is the *Allied* characters page, so I have deleted the sections on the RA3 Soviet and Empire leaders. GGdown (talk) 23:29, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soviet/Empire Leaders