lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cisco

message: Under the controversies section I think we should mention the current lawsuits regarding caste based discrimination in the US?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/07/13/new-lawsuit-shines-light-caste-discrimination-us-around-world/
https://www.zdnet.com/article/commentary-how-indias-ancient-caste-system-is-ruining-lives-in-silicon-valley/
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.242.244.29 (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caste based discrimination 

message: IronPort was redirected to this article. There was a merge discussion with result: "REDIRECT. Material was already at the target article." However, this article is lacking essential information that the last revision of IronPort had: founders, founding date, headquarters, and some details about IronPort's products (search for keywords: AsyncOS, SpamCop). Also, this article still has links to IronPort that circle back to Cisco. In this state, reverting the redirect seems more reasonable. --Matthäus Wander (talk) 16:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  IronPort
Talk:Independence of psychohistory

message: This needs serious work to be made NPOV; as it stands it is shamelessly partisan.  It contains at least one glaring error: note the statement, "...the opinions of historians and anthropologists on psychohistorical matters should have no more weight than the opinion of an experimental physicist should have on theoretical physics; none whatsoever."  In actual fact, the findings of experimental physics are the basis against which all theory must be tested. If an experimental physicist has reason to believe that something in theoretical physics is contrary to the evidence, then his opinion is most certainly relevant.  -- April 11:59 Aug 1, 2002 (PDT)
----
Why is this page separate to the Psychohistory page? It would make more sense as a section within the Psychohistory page which would then allow that page more balanced when the views of Historians sceptical of Psychohistory are recorded there.
Lumos3 23:54, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Proteins

message: I started this page because I linked to it myself, but then I noticed a good page with the title protein already existed. How do I autolink to that page from this one?
I think you mean a redirect - type "#REDIRECT protein" on the first line. -phma
It's good that you noticed :-) -- In general, all wikipedia topic pages have singular titles. Welcome aboard! -- Marj Tiefert 17:28 Aug 1, 2002 (PDT)
This has got to be a category on its own. And all the protein articles should be linked to it. BorisTM 07:24, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Richard Burton

message: okay, please provide evidence that Olivier is the gold standard for acting for all time, or move this crappy comparison out of the introduction. 2603:6011:1D00:4150:844C:94E0:AEC0:7692 (talk) 02:07, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: From the BBC: "He was, many felt, the natural successor to Olivier...". We go with what is reliably sourced and well documented. Tub st (talk) 14:09, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison to Olivier 

message: please add 'The Last Days of Dolwyn', 1949. Burton was 24. Stormyking (talk) 06:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already mentioned several times in the main text, and is also in the list at Richard Burton on stage, screen, radio and record. Deb (talk) 09:37, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography 

message: At the end of the first paragraph in this section - please italicize the play title (Richard III). Thanks! 57.140.16.1 (talk) 18:32, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: , and your a regular editor, I suggest creating an account so you can edit semi-protected pages. Alexeyevitch(talk) 11:01, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 February 2024
Talk:Roald Dahl

message: Change it to "popular British" author from British popular author 2001:56A:F8C3:4C00:F4C4:4EAD:2061:9273 (talk) 01:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: - I've actually moved the "popular" to refer to the literature rather than Dahl himself, as him being popular is likely not the intended meaning. Tollens (talk) 05:25, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

text: It should read "Popular Welsh Norwegian author", that is what is correct. 24.47.21.201 (talk) 15:33, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Why? Drmies (talk) 15:58, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 September 2023 

message: 2001:8F8:1735:2347:15CC:4946:E183:7EA7 (talk) 12:05, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. Cannolis (talk) 13:12, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 October 2023 

message: Remove "Wales" from infobox per MOS:GEOLINK. 49.150.4.134 (talk) 04:36, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: GEOLINK advises the removal of the link, which I assume is what you meant. Thanks! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 November 2023 

message: If anyone has any info on the relative popularity of the 2023 edited versions vs "classic" versions, I think this would be interesting info to add. 1.132.106.132 (talk) 10:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparative sales stats on edited versions 

message: I WANT TO EDIT 172.116.189.114 (talk) 21:09, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 21:47, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 May 2024
Talk:Juan Diego

message: What part of "Cuauhtlatoatzin" means "eagle"? There's a bird called "hoatzin", but it is totally unlike an eagle. -phma
:"Cuauh" is the root of "Cuauhtli", eagle. "Tlatoa" means "to speak", and -tzin is a honorary suffix. --Mixcoatl 19:05, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cuauhtlatoatzin

message: I want it projected so nothing dumb happensLoganTheWatermelon (talk) 01:48, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection please
Talk:Gustav Mahler

message: The original quote is "I am thrice homeless, as a native of Bohemia in Austria, as an Austrian among Germans, and as a Jew throughout the world. Everywhere an intruder, never welcomed." I think the text using the part of the quote is changing the meaning of his words. He lived in Jihlava, where was a german speaking majority at the time (so called Jihlava language island), so he felt as an intruder almost only because of his jewish origin as in the whole world. Bohemia didn't very contribute to it (it was the first country in the world who acknowledged Jew nationality in the census, the situation of Jews was always above average compare to the rest of Europe). On the contrary in Vienna was a strong antisemitism and he was seen as a some czech Jew here, so twice intruder. 46.135.20.12 (talk) 23:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you talking about the section Gustav Mahler#Family background? Mgnbar (talk) 00:10, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The source says: "Bohemia was then part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire; Mahler's native tongue was German, and he ranked as an Austrian subject of Jewish descent. He was thus from the beginning affected by racial tensions: he belonged to an unpopular Austrian minority among Bohemians, and to an unpopular Jewish minority within the Austrian one. Throughout his life, he felt a sense of exile. He once said: 'I am thrice homeless, as a native of Bohemia in Austria, as an Austrian amongst Germans, as a Jew throughout the world. Always an intruder, never welcomed.'" I think the relevant section of the article accurately and succinctly represents the source. Tim riley talk 08:11, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote
Talk:Ash

message: I removed many redlinked entries for towns in the United States in an attempt to follow the Manual of Style for Disambiguation Pages. The entries I removed were linked only from this disambiguation page, and the linked county articles for those entries did not mention the towns and therefore provided no further information about them. Propaniac (talk) 18:10, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed entries for places in the United States

message: Does anyone else think we should put given and surnames back into this disambig page? --Knulclunk (talk) 01:49, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As there has been no response, I will proceed.--Knulclunk (talk) 17:35, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names back here? 

message: I see that names has been split off from Ash.  Why would we want this? It causes a double step for every bad Ash link, hindering the purpose of a disambiguation page. --Knulclunk (talk) 04:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the problem is that you recently merged the name pages into the disambiguation page. That's not the (currently) proper procedure. I only noticed because you made several mistakes in templating.--William Allen Simpson (talk) 04:11, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Thank you. Back when we started splitting the name definitions from the disambiguation pages in 2006, we always left the notable names behind. But the consensus changed, and now they move the name links, too. It's just a simple extra step for disambiguating, not a big deal.--William Allen Simpson (talk) 04:42, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seperate Names 

message: What is the ash that's listed as a nutrient?129.133.206.180 (talk) 06:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nutrient 

message: What's the difference? Maybe add a link and brief explanation in the see also section 80.189.85.4 (talk) 20:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soot 

message: The inclusion of volcanic ash here is problematic, since this article discusses ash as solid residue from burning something. Volcanic ash has a hot source, but nothing actually burns to produce it; it's just a result of fragmenting magma or rock. I'm sort of inclined to move it to See Also, since it's sort of the odd one out among the other forms of ash listed here, but I'd like to hear feedback. TornadoLGS (talk) 05:36, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  An issue with volcanic ash 

message: It would be great if someone can expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in French. That page looks great, but I don’t know French.
*
--Dustfreeworld (talk) 10:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great information in French
Talk:Taipei

message: So do y celebrate it like England like grantham 92.5.118.231 (talk) 14:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand what you're trying to say but in Taiwan Christmas is more of a consumerist/materialistic holiday. People don't celebrate Christmas in the traditional way (eg. go to Church) since there's not a lot of Christians in Taiwan, but there are plenty of decorations and activities to do. Many stores often sell Christmas-related things during the season too. Taiwanesetoast888 (talk) 01:50, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christmas 

message: I don’t know what to do my girl had a flight on Saturday then was taken away for two days then left alone I don’t know if she made it to the airport after the Reebok when they left her her name is Lara joy Suarez Rojas91 (talk) 23:50, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help  

message: It seems like Taiwan has some kind of a rainforest environment and climate. דולב חולב (talk) 00:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rainforest climate
Talk:List of dog breeds

message: I propose to merge List of extinct dog breeds into this list, likely redirected to List of dog breeds#Extinct breeds and varieties. The former is an unnecessary WP:CONTENTFORK of this list. Cavalryman (talk) 13:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Somehow I forgot to put merger tags on both articles, now corrected. I will not take any action for another seven days. Cavalryman (talk) 10:50, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

text: Just as long as it's in a separate section as you suggest, I'm in favour. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: As per WP:LISTN, which does not mention navigation, do you have evidence that a list of extinct dogs "has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources"? William Harristalk 22:51, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Check that and search for the word "navigation" it is quite clear about this.  Dream Focus 19:45, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal:List of extinct dog breeds 

message: I want to be a vet but cant unless i know all about them. 2A00:23C8:A92A:6B01:D130:E191:1BBC:6356 (talk) 16:51, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dog breeds 

message: Given all of these breeds have articles on them is a citation showing they exist/are notable really needed? Traumnovelle (talk) 07:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are citations needed?
Talk:Herod

message: (Discussion moved to Talk:Massacre of the Innocents) Gdr 20:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massacre of the Innocents 

message: Which of these is referenced in Hamlet? That would be nice to include... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Freezing the mainstream (talk • contribs) 03:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hamlet 

message: This article says:
* Herod of Chalcis, also known as Herod III, king of Chalcis (AD 41–48)
Yet when we go the article on Herod of Chalchis we are told he is aka Herod V.
Which is correct?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ammimajus (talk • contribs) 18:31, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Herod III or Herod IV 

message: This article says "Herod Archelaus (born 23 BC, ruled 4 BC–c. AD 18)."  However, the other Wikipedia articles I can find on the subject say he died in AD 18 but ruled only until AD 6, when he was removed by Roman Emperor Augustus and the Province of Judea put under direct Roman rule (which is why Pontius Pilate was the authority in Jerusalem when Jesus died). See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herodian_dynasty, Rise to Power, 2nd paragraph, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herod_Archelaus, initial summary.  I am not expert enough on the subject to change what's here, but I know there's a discrepancy. Gms3591 (talk) 14:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed this. tahc chat 16:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted this edit, since we don't normally have such details in this, a disambiguation page. Past edit summaries are not themselves editable. tahc chat 16:22, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rule dates of Herod Archelaus 

message: 82.177.40.11 (talk) 08:23, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Another large set of Wikidata without English
Talk:Shrines to the Virgin Mary

message: This page is a decent start. It might be helpful to describe what a shrine or sanctuary is in this context, what their significance is, and so forth. Should the histories of these shrines be put in separate articles or just included here to flesh out the current article? Wesley
-----
Nothing wrong with content but couldn't we come up with a better title. One that doesn't start with "The" would be a start. Maybe "Famous Virgin Mary shrines" or "Shrines to the Virgin Mary".  --rmhermen
I wonder if this should be merged with Marian apparitions. Most of the content seems to overlap. If so, I think the main article should be at "Marian apparitions", since the shrines are mostly a side effect or consequence of the sightings. Wesley
Their content does overlap substantially but it would be a mistake to merge them. The shrines pages should be about the shrines, the apparitions exclusively about the apparitions. They aren't the same - one is about locations, one is about (or should be rewritten to be about) apparitions. Merging them when they aren't actually about the same thing (or shouldn't be with a rewrite) would be as absurd as merging George W. Bush and the White House. STÓD/ÉÍRE 17:46 Mar 31, 2003 (UTC)
-------
What is the distinction between a Virgin Mary shrine and a church dedicated to her? Marie-Reine-du-Monde Cathedral is not the site of some famous apparition, but it is a sanctuary dedicated to Mary. Some guidance? - Montréalais
A Virgin Mary shrine is the site of an alleged apparition. A location that is not the site of an apparition should not be called a Virgin Mary Shrine. FearÉÍREANN 21:21 16 May 2003 (UTC)
Is this page going to be moved? If there are no objections, I will move it. --Jiang 22:43, 16 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Dhimmi

message: :Timeline of antisemitism has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. patsw (talk) 16:18, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Timeline of antisemitism]] has an [[WP:RFC|RfC]]

message: By way of rebuttal, consider this paragraph from a 14 century Muslim bureaucrat in Egypt (https://nyupress.org/9781479889457/the-sword-of-ambition/ ) 
"The dimmis must not be permitted to call themselves by Muslim names, being addressed as 'Abu I-Hasan,  'Abu 'Ali,' 'Abu Tahir,' and the like. Likewise, we must bar them from using the honorific title of Shaykh, for the dignity of Islam and the pride of the faith flatly forbid that they should do this. They must be compelled to wear their distinguishing belts and clasp them about their waists in plain view. Let the rider take care not to hide his distinguishing belt by sitting on it. They must not be permitted to ride any kind of horse or mule. Let them not pass by the tombs of 'Muslims by day or by night. They must not be permitted caparisoned mounts. Let the caskets of their dead-open, not closed -be pulled along the ground by ropes of palm fiber.They must be forbidden to carry their caskets on their shoulders. Let them instead be dragged through the dust." The last part of the document reads:'Let them be forbidden to make their tombs white.' 
 Victoryodaiken (talk) 19:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first paragraph of this section is misleading.
Talk:MOVE (Philadelphia organization)

message: Surely this should be 'interdependant'? big difference for a typo.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr zoidberg590 (talk • contribs) 21:58, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  'MOVE members believe that as all living beings are dependent'

message: "forcibly remove the thirteen members from the house, which consisted of eight adults and six children."
When I add 8 adults and 6 children, I get 14 people. I guess they wanted to take out the 13 people who were members and leave the one non-member. Was the non-member a child? Anyway, it's kinda confusing. Could be clearer. MilesOdonnol (talk) 06:00, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: And, in addition, the number 13 doesn't appear anywhere in the cited source (except when referring to the date ExpatSalopian (talk) 22:50, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simple arithmetic question 

message: Hello, recently there have been numerous accusations of abuse within MOVE, which I thought should be included on the page. I'm new to editing, so I just started a section about it. There are a lot more resources out there, including the Murder at Ryan's Run podcast, and the Leaving MOVE blog started by Kevin Price. I will do my best to work on this section, but it might take me some time. I thought I'd leave a note for anyone else editing in case they wanted to look into it. Thank you!
Simplefruits (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abuse Allegations
Talk:Dungeon Hack

message: download link leads to paysite... removed Balou 19:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link

message: These two should be disambiguated:  a "dungeon hack" can refer to a great many experiences (i.e., dungeon crawl), whereas "Dungeon Hack" refers to the video game.  75.0.9.13 (talk) 21:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dungeon Hack vs. dungeon hack 

message: There is also an Open Source game project called DungeonHack that is developing a Morrowind-style game.  Should it be mentioned here? --202.45.98.212 (talk) 05:23, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know; is there any connection other than the name? Do you have any reliable sources to add with the information? 67.175.176.178 (talk) 07:57, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The other DungeonHack
Talk:City News Bureau of Chicago

message: It's not clear to me that there is any relationship between the older City New Bureau of Chicago and the 2015 organization City Bureau. There currently is a small section on the latter in this article. I created a full article for this organization here: City Bureau. Any objections to me removing the City Bureau section here and just including a Distinguish template?  as the person who I think added the content. --Bairdwarp (talk) 20:26, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection. Alanscottwalker (talk) 20:39, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Done, though I decided to go with the about template instead to provide more context. --Bairdwarp (talk) 21:51, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving City Bureau section
Talk:Macro-mutation

message: "However beneficial macromutations have been known to occur. For example the addition of body segments among arthropods may be regarded as a macromutation."
This article is terrible and full on non-sense
-----------------  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.41.31.163 (talk) 21:12, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: : this process is macromutation, essentially when a large-scale mutation produces a characteristic.
I do not really know, but I think that the "large scale" of macromutations refers only to the phenotypic effect, rather than what´s happening on the genes. That means, the mutation is no molecularly different than one that causes the average minor phenotypic variations on the population. I think I´m right because simple mutations in hox genes are enough to cause the sort of drastic phenotypic changes mentioned on the article, and at the same time, large mutations at the molecular level, such as Robertsonian fusions might have no big phenotypic consequences.
But if it realy refers to something bigger happening with the genes themselves, I think it should be more specific; if not, it should be mentioned. If both happens, should be made explicit that what matters is the phenotypic effect.
--Extremophile 03:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Generally it's referring to genes. However, a large change in phenotype can also be the result of only a small change in base pairs - maybe even just one. This isn't a 'true' macromutation, and it's important to distinguish the two types. Richard001 03:23, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  macromutation refers to genome or phenotype? 

message: #This article is wholly unsourced.
#It's most prominent sub-topic would appear to be Hopeful Monster, which has a large section explicitly on 'Large scale mutations' i.e. Macromutations
#I'm therefore proposing that we merge the title of this article with the sourced content of Hopeful Monster, via a WP:USURPTITLE.
#(Parenthetically, there's also some material turned up at WP:FTN#Soren Lovtrup that can be used to expand out this topic slightly, so that it's not wholly on Goldschmidt.)
HrafnTalkStalk(P) 03:03, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal