lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Petty officer

message: In the introduction three of the british forces are referenced specifically, when their rank equivalents are more clearly detailed in the United Kingdom section. I suggest removing these references and adding a subsection for equivalent ranks to the UK section and other countries' sections where it is applicable. 76.241.134.47 (talk) 14:42, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction Suggestions

message: What is the line in the table of Royal Navy ranks which has OR-x ? Please modify to make this meaningful. Thx Facius 12:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the line in the table of Royal Navy ranks which has OR-x

message: "Petty officer, third class is equivalent in paygrade to corporal in the United States Army (or specialist)"
Propose dropping the "(or specialist)".  While PO3, CPL and SPC are all E-4 paygrade, only the first two are NCOs; the latter is considered a non-NCO position.  Thoughts? --ip.address.conflict (talk) 14:00, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed minor change

message: Whilst I don't question the reference the line stating Midshipman evolved into Naval Cadet is (I suspect) very US specific or at least quoted in a way which leaves the reader with the wrong impression. In any case it seems superfluous in an article about the rate of Petty Officer. Suggest that line be removed? At best it is superfluous and at worst it is not clear enough that this does not apply to all Navies or that the rank of Midshipman still, and always has, existed in Commonwealth Navies. Naval Cadet may have split off from the rank but most Commonwealth countries still use Midshipman as the most junior officer rank. Sure, often one still in 'on the job' training, but it is quite possible to be on the trained strength for a short while still as a Midshipman on completion of training. Nowadays, generally the rank of 'Officer Cadet' is used whilst in basic officer training or equivalent. 207.132.224.130 (talk) 06:03, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed; I'm not sure that a midshipman was ever regarded as a petty officer. Alansplodge (talk) 16:48, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not US specific. The source is N.A.M. Rodgers, the eminent historian of the Royal Navy, in a book about the Royal Navy. So you have to trust it. The midshipmen were technically petty officers, but they were not regarded as such. They were regarded as young gentlemen together with others borne as able seamen or Captain's servants on the books of the ship. Creuzbourg (talk) 09:17, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Midshipman evolved into...?
Talk:The Lightning Thief

message: I think this article could benefit from having a section on the characters as well as Riordan's thoughts on these characters compiled from interviews and such, much like we see in the Harry Potter & the Philosopher's Stone article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Potter_and_the_Philosopher%27s_Stone Mk2109 (talk) 19:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe a character page would be amazing and could really benefit this article. Although the article is already astounding, it could be better, as all things are. 76.145.181.225 (talk) 03:12, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Characters" Section 

message: This article needs a mention of the graphic novel, both the film and book versions. The Sea of Monsters Page already has one, I know.
2ReinreB2 (talk) 05:25, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need mention of graphic novel 

message: I just noticed that this article has been placed under the category "Summer camps in fiction". Does it really belong there? Camp Half-Blood, one of the settings of the book, is a summer camp, yes-- but does the article about the book itself belong there? Advice needed. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 15:31, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category: Summer camps in fiction 

message: Is it true that The Lightning Thief was published first as an audiobook? We give dates June 28 for the audio and July 1 for print, with sources. I noticed the novelty yesterday at ISFDB which gives simply Jun 2005 for the audio CD and Jul 2005 for the U.S. print hardcover . (Also Sep 2005 U.K. print; Jan 2006 audio cassette; Jan 2006 U.S. large print.) The first print edition must be missing at ISFDB, i surmised, or the audio CD mistakenly dated. But now I surmise no mistake.
Apparently true. If so, does anyone know, preferably from reading, how unusual that was in 2005 or is today? Does anyone know of the promotional effort that supported release of a $40.00 audiobook before the novel was a hit? It would be good (to be able reliably) to say more about this in the article.
P.S. In the lead section we say "published in June" by Miramax Books --that is, print-- but the sources do not support that.
--P64 00:13 --P64 (talk) 00:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication dates and formats
Talk:Queen's Regulations and Orders for the Canadian Forces

message: This is a good start, but further information about each section would be nice. Carom 02:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: There is no such thing as a KR&O.  The name of the instrument is in QR&O 1.01.  Until that is amended, the legal name is QR&O, not KR&O.
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/corporate/policies-standards/queens-regulations-orders/vol-1-administration/ch-1-introduction-definitions.html
1.01 – TITLE
This publication shall be called the Queen's Regulations and Orders for the Canadian Forces and may be cited as QR&O.
(M) 24.212.231.232 (talk) 22:13, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  QR&O to KR&O
Talk:Minister of National Defence (Canada)

message: are you kidding me, please tell me this individual is not the head of our defense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.135.87 (talk) 04:34, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Burmese Americans

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Asian American#Infobox ethnicity representatives.  RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 07:40, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox image discussion

message: The top counties according to the Migration Policy Institute website are not what it has been changed to.
Just look up Myanmar (Burma) and compare what the the current list. You'll see what I mean. 2603:6011:A400:8873:3DF2:B6A7:A02D:9724 (talk) 21:04, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top counties according to the MPI website
Talk:Li Chengqian

message: The following was removed from the original article
::He was survived by a grandson, Li Shi (李適), who later pled to Emperor Xuanzong that his grandfather be buried in Zhao Cemetery (昭陵). Li Shi's wish was granted on December 8, Kaiyuan 25, after Li Chengqian was given the posthumous name of Prince Mǐn of Héngshan (恒山湣王) August 27 the year before. However, it wasn't until May 29, Kaiyuan 26 that Li Shi moved his grandfather into Zhao Cemetery. New Tang Book recorded the burial to be very elaborate, but when the 30 x 3.1-metre tomb was excavated in 1972, it was not found to be the case. There were only 118 characters in his biography memorial tablet (墓誌) and 234 in seal script on his tombstone.
1.) 李適 is not pronounced shi4, the historical reading of that time is believed to be Li Kuo4, see http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%94%90%E5%BE%B7%E5%AE%97 (适 is the simplified version of 適)
2.) Is 李適 really the grandson of 李承乾?
:2.1) In history, 李適 is the 9th emperor of 唐, 唐德宗, not the grandson of deposed crown prince.
:2.2) 李承乾 died when he was 25~ish, how can he have a grandson?  If his grandson was sired by his son, who 'survived' him, it cannot be said that he is survived by his grandson, as surviving means still living.  Given the highly unlikely scenario that his son sired another, which would mean that, minus the 18 months required for the two pregnancies, the average age of these fathers at the time of conception was 11 years of age.  Please check this.
I do not have the time necessary at the present moment to conduct a much more detailed research into his life and lineage, but the above seemed to be obviously incorrect as it stands.
::It's really Li Shizhi (李適之), a chancellor during the reign of Emperor Xuanzong.  --Nlu (talk) 04:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eugene Nalimov

message: Please see Talk:Eugene Nalimov/Temp. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 01:14, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Replacement for copyvio
Talk:Jeremy Steig

message: A web page that appears to be Jeremy Steig's official web page shows that he may have died on April 13, 2016. Source: http://www.jeremysteig.info/index-E.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.36.254.103 (talk) 15:05, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Jeremy Steig deceased? 

message: Links to article about another album, same title, completely unrelated.
Silverlake Bodhisattva 20:58, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album link re: "Energy" incorrect
Talk:Paul Fejos

message: The article relies almost entirely on 2 cites but includes very detailed paragraphs that are somewhat controversial (like subject's lying about his origins.) In this case, page numbers are needed. Are these taken directly from the cites as quotes and not indicated as such? Are there any other cites available? EBY (talk) 15:30, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: C Assessment
Talk:Honey, We're Killing the Kids

message: I have removed the section labeled "Show Format". 1st of all, I realize that somone must have worked very hard on this, typing things in as they appeared on the television. A full description of what was aired, however, just isn't encyclopedic. Wikipedia isn't a TV guide, or a TV substitute. This would be much like just adding the complete transcript to the page, which could easiyl get us sued if they found out. Another reason it was removed was because there were many POV sections, such as CG hairstyles being labeled as "bizarre". One can predict what  hairstyles teens will have, and besides, Wikipedia isn't a place to label such things correct or not. None of the information in any of the paragraphs is cited, so how do we know a contributer didn't just make it up on the fly, so to speak? It just had to go.--Planetary 01:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You can have an episode guide, as there are many TV show articles with episode guide such as Corner Gas.  All you need is a brief synopsis of the episode and nothing more.  Mr. C.C. 17:16, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Show Format" 

message: Currently has it's own article but phrase doesn't seem to be in use, no google mentions for the phrase having this meaning except wikipedia, and presumably HWKtK.  So -Merge to HWKtK.Merkinsmum 12:49, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Honey Time"
Talk:Greensplat

message: I've got a photograph of what's left of the village, including the cottage "Kenwyn" with the writing sprayed on the wall - I'll post it at some point when I've got time. The article needs more, maybe some information on the opposition to the destruction of the village, a few sources, plus a ton of information on the history of the village, how it came to be, and what was there before it (IE some of the early farmsteads). Not sure on the definition/etymology for the name, so someone else is probably going to have to put that in. If you make any changes let me know on my talk page.--▫Bad▫harlick♠ 01:23, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done a re-edit of this article just to bring it up to date and make it a bit more accurate. Greensplat is one of those lost villages that just slipped quietly away, so it's rather difficult to find any useful information. There are only a handful of living people who remember the place. The last inhabitants were paid nearly twice the property values as an incentive to move, and I'd like to see if I can get in contact with these people to see if they have any interesting tidbits. Greensplat was always a rather poor place so I'm sure the prospect of being given just under half a million pounds each was too good to refuse. As I remember it, run-down outhouses and car-strewn paddocks gave the place a fairly bad reputation on the property market before it's destruction, so I imagine the last people to live there had all been there for quite some time. ▫Bad▫harlick♠ 14:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:List of military decorations

message: Could somebody put Tapperhet I Fält and the Order of the Sword under Sweden? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.210.224.224 (talk) 20:22, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweden 

message: The term "Nazi Germany" is colloquial speech and doesn't exist as such.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.191.142.47 (talk) 18:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed "Nazi Germany" to "Third Reich" 

message: OK, so every other country manages to do ok with a short list of their highest military honors and a . Why does the US need an all-inclusive table? --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû (blah?) 06:31, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  United States 

message: Virtually all the linked per-country articles/categories include civilian honors, and some of the individual awards listed here are also non-military. Thoughts on renaming to reflect the article's actual scope? Possible names include:
# List of orders, decorations, and medals by country
# List of orders, decorations, and medals
# Lists of orders, decorations, and medals by country
# Lists of orders, decorations, and medals
I would lean somewhat towards #1. #2 is a bit more concise, and avoids the awkwardness of implicitly counting Ancient Rome as a "country", but also a bit less precise. 3 and 4 reflect the fact that this article is mostly a WP:LISTOFLISTS.
The alternative of changing the article's content to reflect the current title would be a lot more work, and would involve fighting against the scheme used for almost all of the relevant categories and per-country articles, which tend to combine civilian and military orders/decorations/medals. Colin M (talk) 16:38, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename to include civilian honors? 
Talk:Mats Helge

message: A user called ”Njaelkies Lea” has changed article “Mats Helge”. And writes, removing unreferenced stuff unlikely to be true, and unencyclopedic stuff like "the immortal classic", all added by a known problematic user.
But this is not true, if you look at the link below, you will see that ”Njaelkies Lea” changes in the article is wrong. Se sources below. All people like ”Njaelkies Lea” who take away information on this article are the real problematic users. Check for yourself. I can´t make changes cause you have protected the article. Make it correct please.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087806/trivia
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/celebrity/mats_helge/biography.php
http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Mats-Helge  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Freespeach (talk • contribs) 18:58, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This user has been repeatedly banned on the Swedish Wikipedia, FYI. Plrk (talk) 21:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Please note that none of those sources are valid. Rottentomatoes and Nationmaster are using old copies of this Wikipedia article - text that originated on Wikipedia cannot be used to support the accuracy of other text on Wikipedia. The third source, IMDB, is not particularly reliable because it is based on content submitted by anyone and rarely quotes its own sources. If you want something included in this article that has been removed then you will have to find a higher quality source. Road Wizard (talk) 01:15, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

text: The article currently has no sources and as the tag on the article says "Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed." I am not familiar with the subject of this article so I will leave it to others to challenge what they feel is wrong. Of course, the ultimate sanction of deleting this article is a possibility if no reliable sources can be found. Road Wizard (talk) 13:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of unsourced content
Talk:Mount Pinos

message: It's nice that someone actually took the time to add some decent information on Mt. Pinos. It could use a section on astronomers that come up here, though. I would do it, but I don't know enough information about it. I just know that they say it's the best spot around for hundreds of miles. Cygnus 01:39, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks:  yes I go up there regularly, and thought it was time for an entry.  I added a paragraph on the popularity of the site with amateur astronomers.  Antandrus  (talk) 02:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Earl Tupper

message: Should we include a picture of tupperware? RJFJR (talk) 18:10, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In 1984, the year after he died, the patent on Tupperware expired. The reference given does not support that sentence, saying "most" patents expired in the 1980's.  Did the reference change?216.228.112.21 (talk) 19:04, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Patents

message: Maybe a Wikipedian can flag this ARSHU in the article to request more info about what it is supposed to mean. 2601:49:4002:5D60:6DCD:2DA:F0D0:6125 (talk) 18:50, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is ARSHU?
Talk:Islam in Slovakia

message: I've edited the article (please don't use the term "Slovakia" or the newly invented place-names in historical text), but there's one more problem: I don't see that "Catholic fundamentalism" would present a negative image of Islam in Central Europe. I don't think people has such image either in Slovakia or in Hungary (see the monument of Suleyman at Szigetvár, etc.) 195.56.30.68 01:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Especially about the monument were heavy and almost violent disputes, and even US State departement Report about Religious Freedom mention such an athmosphere including referendum against Muslim settlements and Mosque-buildings. In those points Hungary, Czech and Slovakia is different from the rest of Central Europe. --Roksanna 06:31, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

message: The Slovak engagement to support USA in its war against Muslims in Iraq more alienate Slovak Muslims from their government´s policy.
This is not neutral at all. I am going to remove it, but I don't know how to change it, because I don't know of a source on how Slovak muslims feel about the Iraqi war.
Jmartinez
:There is an interview (The Slovak Spectator, TSS) mit the Bratislava Imam Mohamed Safwan Hasan (MSH). He exactly said the same. --Roksanna 11:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that the Imam response was not around alienation of Muslims, as I thought he felt, so I changed it [Rmartinez]
I seems you are wrong. At least this was exactly the question, and of course he did answer diplomatically. --Roksanna 21:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not NPOV 

message: There was an unsourced address on Stare Grunty in Bratislava for a mosque, however there is no Slovak language site which says there is a mosque there (search mesita Bratislava) just one or two general English language tourist sites which also give no sources (and most likely are based on this wiki). Perhaps there was once a mosque there, but we are regularly told that there is no mosque in Slovakia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:130:400:1660:8CAB:D46D:151F:3E49 (talk) 08:31, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mosque in Slovakia 
Talk:Psychopathic Rydas

message: This is 'really' bad. I'm going to do a bit of editing, hopefully someone else can do more.
Neowave 01:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Manual for Courts-Martial

message: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/12/13/executive-order-2011-amendments-manual-courts-martial-united-states
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release December 13, 2011 
Executive Order -- 2011 Amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. 801-946), and in order to prescribe amendments to the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, prescribed by Executive Order 12473, as amended, it is hereby ordered as follows:
Section 1. Parts III and IV of the Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, are amended as described in the Annex attached and made a part of this order.
Sec. 2. These amendments shall take effect 30 days from the date of this order.
(a) Nothing in these amendments shall be construed to make punishable any act done or omitted prior to the effective date of this order that was not punishable when done or omitted.
(b) Nothing in these amendments shall be construed to invalidate any nonjudicial punishment proceedings, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial in which arraignment occurred, or other action begun prior to the effective date of this order, and any such nonjudicial punishment, restraint, investigation, referral of charges, trial, or other action may proceed in the same manner and with the same effect as if these amendments had not been prescribed.
BARACK OBAMA
THE WHITE HOUSE,
December 13, 2011.... 
December 16, 2011 8:08 AM EST  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.194.166.2 (talk) 05:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 Executive Order 

message: The external link for "Manual for Courts-Martial (MCM), United States (2012 Edition)" currently links to http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/law/mcm.pdf though I believe it should more properly link to https://jsc.defense.gov/Portals/99/Documents/MCM2012.pdf
Kiisu Buraun (talk) 20:25, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manual for Courts-Martial - External links : bad link
Talk:Elizabeth Dilling

message: To add to this article: mention of Dilling's death. 204.11.189.94 (talk) 16:11, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article 

message: According to this article: "one of the most outspoken critics of the New Deal, which she referred to as the 'Jew Deal'. In the mid-to-late 1930s, Dilling expressed sympathy for Nazi Germany." I looked up the sources and they certainly disparage Elizabeth Dilling, but they do not say anything about her using the term "Jew Deal" and not one word of her alleged support for Nazi Germany in either of the sources. 45.92.229.32 (talk) 14:16, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources do not support claim.