lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tyrenga

message: On May 13, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was merge/redirect.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Tyrenga for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 05:41, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: Good article--but I'm not persuaded that the existence of the Tyrenga is as unambiguously proven as the article currently claims. ("But the skeptics have been proven wrong. The big cat that roams Britain is a mystery no more.")  Even the site ukbigcats.co.uk, cited, here, says: 
"To this day several photographs exist although none that are without their flaws as conclusive evidence."  
If the evidence is so flawless, why am I unable to find a non-cryptozoology source substantiating these claims?  Though the evidence is impressive, a quick Google search turns up continued arguments against the existence of a "beast" such as http://terriermandotcom.blogspot.com/2005/04/beast-of-exmoor-and-other-nonsense.html.  
Or this from an Exmoor wildlife site:
<<Exmoor Beast
Fact or Fiction ? Exmoor National Park has 6 different packs of hounds on the moor, one or more are out on every day of week apart from Sunday - these riders and hounds constantly cover every square inch of Exmoor, often being videoed both by hunt members and others. Also they are accompanied by a multitude of car followers constantly scanning the landscape with binoculars - often with cameras to hand. So the conclusions is - the Exmoor beast would have been seen and photographed many many times by now . Yet to the best of local knowledge, not one single hunting person has even glimpsed the Exmoor Beasts disappearing tail - it cannot exist. Yet extensive damage was done to farm animals several years ago, possible by an escaped big cat from a wildlife park now long gone or a dog who needed his toenails clipping.>>
Can we rework this article to take both sides into account?
Dvyost 00:49, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV objection
Talk:Jensen Karp

message: wikipedia shouldn't be home to every new sexual position that appears on south park.  If it does belong, it won't be deleted.  Please don't remove recommendations for deletion from your own page. Citizen Premier 06:04, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not some new thing and the episode is old.  If you want the recommendation left, then you must put it up on these two wikies as well that are basically from south park as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirty_Sanchez
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donkey_punch
See?
People for a long time wondered what they were talking about it on that episode, and wikipedia to my shock only mentioned a couple after all this time.  Thodin 06:10, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

text: I thought I saw a some page about this before on wikipedia.  Does this mean the vote for deletion will stop?  I looked around and I couldn't find out even how to vote on this, just a lot of recommendations about the thing.  The speedy deletion policy doesn't say it will get deleted though based on it (since it has a reference to a popular TV program).  Hmm...  I'd say it might need the old "stub" tag, too, but a lot of articles start small.  I think thought I'm changing blowjob to more scientific terms.  Thodin 06:22, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Seems after the viral bit a lot of former girlfriends and co-workers have come out to air grievances about him. https://www.thedailybeast.com/comedian-jensen-karp-faces-allegations-of-abusive-behavior-after-viral-shrimp-cereal-tweet  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Of 19 (talk • contribs) 07:40, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probably notable
Talk:Stuck in a Moment You Can't Get Out Of

message: On May 14, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Stuck in a Moment You Can't Get Out Of for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 06:22, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: Must the last of not be written lower case?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.22.28.154 (talk) 16:28, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Frog war

message: Can there be a frog war if the second railroad builds a bridge over the first?
Tabletop 06:22, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That can be an outcome of a frog war - or in some cases just the action of building the bridge might be enough to cause hostility. --SPUI (talk - RFC) 18:08, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago
FeatureType :
Lat/Lng : 41.76 / -87.61
Greater Grand Crossing, one of the 77 official community areas of Chicago, Illinois, is located on the city's south side. The neighborhood's name comes from an 1853 right of way feud between the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Railway and the Illinois Central Railroad that led to a frog war and a crash that killed 18 people. (...)
Tabletop (talk) 04:41, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greater Grand Crossing, Chicago 
Talk:Wang Xifeng

message: If I call correctly, Wang Xifeng was not described as "well educated" but rather mostly illiterate.
: You're right. Wang Xifeng is not very well educated. For one she can't write beautiful and sophisticaed poems like the rest of the upper class girls.--Wooddoo-eng 12:38, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:San

message: San also means "Dream" in some Slavic languages- i.e Serbian.
By Mira — Preceding unsigned comment added by  64.228.99.40  (talk • contribs)  06:36, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

message: What does this movie have to do with 'san'? I'll leave it in there, but whoever added that, you should clarify why Princess Mononoke might be related to san. --Visual77 04:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Princess Mononoke?

message: Please merge upper and lower case disambiguations.  Why is an admin going against policy when undoing edits?
Page naming conventions
A disambiguation page is usually named after the generic topic (eg "Term XYZ"). "Term XYZ (disambiguation)" is not the standardized name for a disambiguation page, and is only used when there is a primary topic with an article at "Term XYZ". It is acceptable, on the other hand, to create a page at "Term XYZ (disambiguation)" that redirects to the disambiguation page at "Term XYZ". This type of redirect can be used to indicate deliberate links to the disambiguation page.
Usually, there should be just one disambiguation page for all cases (upper- or lower-case) and variant punctuation.
For example, "Term xyz", "Term Xyz", "Term X-Y-Z", and "Term X.Y.Z." should all redirect to one page. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.109.5.203 (talk) 01:52, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I did the same thing with UNI earlier. Well I didn't do it, I don't really know what to do in order to merge...but this is a definite merge situation. Bassgoonist 23:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation guidelines
Talk:Atossa

message: Do not put crosses next to death dates for non-Christians! Not only is this disrespectful to non-Christians, but it is potentially offensive to Christians who do not want their symbols to be used for those who do not share their faith!  And irksome to people like me who are obsessive about the proper categorizations of things.
Traditionally, you put a cross by a Christian, a Star of David by a Jew, and a Crescent & Star by the name of a Muslim when marking deaths.  I do not know if there is a conventional symbol for Zoroastrian deaths (Atossa was most likely a Mazdean/proto-Zoroastrian), but I am looking.  In the meantime we should dispense with the marker for this article.
--Jpbrenna 06:39, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The third paragraph states; "Xerxes I was the eldest son of Atossa and Darius... Atossa's special position enabled Xerxes, who was not the eldest son of Darius, to succeed his father.". So, was Xerxes the eldest son of Darius, or not?????Lily20 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 17:28, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no contradiction! As Darius had wives and a son before marrying Atossa. Xashaiar (talk) 05:06, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction on Darius and Xerxes 

message: There is an "Atossa" mentioned in the Tractatus De Mulieribus as being raised by her father Ariaspes as a male and inheriting the kingdom, and TDM says that Hellanicus is the source for the information. Is this the same person? I know her father has a different name in this article, but is Ariaspes an alternative name for him? Asarelah (talk) 14:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Tractatus De Mulieribus
Talk:Quanzhen Pai

message: The same issue is happening with the Wang Chongyang article. This article has two targets: the historical Quanzhen School and the one that was fictionalized by Jin Yong. The short intro on Quanzhen should be elaborated on. I don't know much about it so anyone who knows, feel free to share your thoughts. Then, this ought to be followed by a discussion of Quanzhen according to Jin Yong's universe. Jute 06:57, May 26, 2005 (UTC)
This article is a little ridiculous.  While it deserves mention that Quanzhen has an important place in Jin Yong's books, the actual history and especially the theological concepts of take far greater precedence.  Quanzhen in Jin Yong's universe should be a minor note.  Unfortunately, I haven't studied this stuff in a long time.  Jake 07:03, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:NFL on NBC

message: Is there anything to suggest the show will be titled "The NFL on NBC" when it returns next year? Seems to me it will carry on the "Sunday Night Football" name that ESPN introduced. Kirjtc2 9 July 2005 00:40 (UTC)
I guess The NFL on NBC is the title they used before The NFL on CBS took over the rights to broadcast AFC games, so for now it seems good to give it that name. Yes, it seems like they are gonna call it NBC Sunday Night Football, or something similar. Mike Francesa of WNBC-TV has called it Sunday Night Football on his TV program. 2004-12-29T22:45Z July 9, 2005 03:41 (UTC)
I'm sure that Randy Edelman's theme was based on his theme from Brisco County. 71.111.215.224 22:32, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are Gayle Sierens and Gayle Gardener one and the same? If so, one of these entries needs to go.
WAVY 10WAVY 10 13:55, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identification Question 

message: I recently started a page on NFL on NBC theme music and would like to request the help of any that are willing in completing the article. WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 20:53, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NFL on NBC music 
Wikipedia talk:Wikilove from the press

message: I really like the quote from one The Economist editorial - "the surprisingly good Wikipedia". But perhaps it is not glowing enough to appear here? Pcb21| Pete 07:36, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I found that quote in my search and I too felt there was a lack of kick in the comment.  That's too bad, I wanted to have a comment from every single "influential" publication on this list.  But I don't see how the Economist can not cover Wikipedia in a comprehensive article one day in their science/technology special editions.  lots of issues  | leave me a message 15:37, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

message: All of these really ought to have external links proving that we didn't just make them all up.  Not that I think you did, lotsofissues, but it does't look so good.  I do like the comments, and the formatting, though.  JesseW 21:56, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost everything was retrieved from subscription electronic databases.  Likely most of these quotes have been placed into closed archives.  lots of issues  | leave me a message 22:55, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links, links, links! 

message: To be neutral we also need a page with criticism from the press. Mieciu K 03:44, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikihate from the press
Talk:Zoot Suit Riots

message: Recently on June of 20203, Los Angeles has publicly apologized for these attacks.
Los Angeles apologizes for Zoot Suit Riots 80 years later (nbcnews.com) Xvfumes (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Los Angeles has recently apologized for the Zoot Suit riot 

message: This sentence makes little sense: . 
*Who or what were the Downey Boys? They are not referenced anywhere else in the article, nor is there an article on the subject elsewhere in the encyclopaedia. 
*Where did the people referenced go? The link is to a place in Texas that does not appear to have survived into the 1940s. Are we saying that the zoot suiters moved from LA to a defunct ranch in rural Texas? Why? 
*Which also raises the question, 'came back to the... neighbourhood' from what or where? Whilst we try to nail down the destination, can we clarify the starting point? 
I don't want to WP:BOLD the statement away, as I suspect there is some rather cool info hidden beneath the confusing phrase. For some reason, I cannot access the RS cited, and I cannot for the life of me figure out what the info was meant to be. Any suggestions? Cheers, Last1in (talk) 12:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Last1in, I've reworded that para per the source. The wikilink for Williams Ranch was incorrect. (I used archive.org to access the page in the source that discusses the incident.) Schazjmd (talk) 13:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Downey Boys? Williams Ranch, ''Texas''?
Talk:1905 Alberta general election

message: There is a 1 Liberal 1 Conservative discrepency between the Alberta Heritage records, and the Election Alberta records, Elections alberta lists 3 Conservatives being elected. In the Alberta Heritage list, 2 Conservatives only show up. I am reaserching the problem
Cloveious 03:28, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discrepancy

message: I had previously merged 1st Alberta Legislative Assembly into this article. That merge was reverted. As the merge is now effectively disputed, I leave it up to the community to come to a consensus. While there may be a technically correct point that a general election and a legislative assembly are two different things, the articles themselves are pretty much redundant redundant as they are almost identical. If there is to be a separate article for the general assembly, it ought not replicate this article. I would expect such an article to be about the 1st legislative assembly to be about what legislation was debated, what notable things happened, etc. Agent 86 21:18, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Merge

message: Could someone fix the colour of the map?  all the Liberal seats are pink.  Should be the same red as is used on the chart of candidates.Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 00:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Colour of the map is wrong

message: I noticed that the infobox and the table of seat standings showed the Conservatives with 3 members and no independents.  That was what was shown on the Archives web-page.  However, that archive page had a note that in case of a discrepency between the web version and the hard copy, the hard copy prevailed.  The hard copy showed that the Conservatives only won 2 seats, and there was one Independent, Henry William McKenny.  I updated the tables and figures based on the hard copy, since it has priority.  Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Updated figures
Talk:Masao Kato

message: : Use the + tab at top to add new comments at the end.  Sign comments with four tildes: ~~~~.
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) 11:24, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why was the article moved back to Masao Kato, after it'd been agreed to using Kato Masao? Can 02:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Can. A new rule for Japanese person's name was established. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles).  It states that "For a modern figure (a person born from the first year of Meiji (1868) onward), always use the Western order of given name + family name."  This rule was established at 21:59, 13 February 2006, nearly a month after the last move. --Neo-Jay 04:29, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: To have these two tables without any caption is rather confusing. I had to spend a few minutes wondering and comparing the two of them before I realized what the second one meant. I think it would be better to have just one table with the years in which he placed second in parantheses. --KagamiNoMiko (talk) 17:55, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles and Runners Up table 

message: I've noticed on the Turkish page for Kato Masao that the komi change was attributed to him and noted as being in 2004. Yet on the page about komi it is stated that the change was made in 2002 which I remember to be so. I saw that the English version of the pages had the same inconsistency. Can anybody clear this up for me?--MyError (talk) 00:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact Check: Komi Rule 
Talk:White maggot

message: Im not 100% sure its only used in Australia..... perhaps someone could verify/deny. - UnlimitedAccess 09:42, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 08:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-10 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:National Power Unity

message: Why party is added to category neo-nazi, anti-imigration and neo-nazi are not the same. Supermacism about gaining 'living space',etc. at expense of other nations, while anti-imigration, nationalism is about protecting ones own. —  AlV 09:59, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In looking over the English introduction to their party (WHO IS NATIONAL POWER UNITY?), I didn't see any overt indentification with National Socialism.  Perhaps someone else knows more? —Morning star 13:51, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Neo-Nazi?

message: If you want, you can use . heqs 08:26, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Current event re gay pride parade
Talk:Cindy Margolis

message: This edit is a compromise of the past two.  Using euphemisms like "show all" or "in the altogether" are OK ocasionally, but for Margolis the areolae and nipples distinction is key.  She's made a career out of posing nude and nearly nude (it's excrutiatingly well documented). Wikipedians cannot be vague, even if the thought of nipples makes you squeemish. Ghosts&empties 13:36, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: areolae

message: Re. categorisation in no-longer-extant :Category:Open marriage, see comments on verification over on Talk:Open marriage. --Calair 01:11, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems the verification does now exist on the talk page, just came from there. Mathmo 13:35, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Open marriage

message: Why is this not acknowledged? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeoffEighinger (talk • contribs) 21:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: She posed nude in the 1980s
Talk:Pax Britannica to Pax Americana

message: Scrap the whole mess. The Pax Americana article includes all this and more. Burschik 10:14, 26 May 2005 (UTC)

message: :Copied from the old cleanup archive:
*Pax Britannica to Pax Americana Definitely needs to be looked at. Not sure if it's a VfD candidate, but it's certainly POV, possibly original research/copyvio, and definitely needs to be moved to a more general article about Britain, the US, or the world in general. saturnight 23:47, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
**Should probably be merged in article about superpower nations.  As a stand-alone article, it feels more like an essay than an article.--Mitsukai 12:57, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge...
Talk:Bethphage

message: I would question why the article links the New Testament period with 'Ancient Israel'. It is better to reserve the term 'Ancient Israel' for earlier periods, primarily the bronze and iron age eras but if necessary up to the time of the Hasmonean dynasty.
BobKilcoyne (talk) 06:16, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to 'Ancient Israel' 

message: WisDom-UK (talk) 11:10, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation needed 

message: The lead confidently states that Bethphage is on the Mount of Olives, then the article goes on to describe two (one?) other possible locations. This need to be clarified. pburka (talk) 22:31, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where?
Talk:Fluorescence resonance energy transfer

message: Hi, the structure for triphosgene in the FRET-phosgene detection scheme is wrong, it is a fluorine analog. Maybe this could be changed? I'm with gerrit 18:47, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure

message: Hi 
I think that is would be more illustrative to have a spectrum that shows no FRET also. With the present spectrum I think it is difficult to see what distinguishes a FRET measurement from just taking an ordinary emission spectrum.
I think it would also be usefull to label the FRET graph.
----
I was thinking about creating a page for BRET (Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer), but I am hesitating: It could just be a section in FRET. It's basically the same thing as FRET except that the photon emission from the donor is biochemically catalysed (by Luciferase-type donor]]) instead of being the result of exciting the donor with an external source. Result: You don't get background noise from the fluorescence of the donor in the results. I am too new to wikipedia to decide :) Looie 16:26, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spectrum/Graph

message: Kappa squared only equals 2/3 when BOTH dyes are isotropically averaged. This should be obvious to anybody who considers the dipole electric field pattern in Three dimensional space. I have corrected the misstatement but I have not included a proper discussion of Kappa Squared. --128.6.78.114 21:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kappa squared comment is wrong. 

message: I think the overlap integral is wrong.  In particular, the standard formulation of FRET is in terms of the rate of energy transfer, which is
: k_{\rm fret} = C \cdot {{\kappa^2} \over {R^6}} \int_0^\infty f_{\rm D}(\tilde{\nu}) \epsilon_{\rm A}(\tilde{\nu}) \tilde{\nu}^{-4} d \tilde{\nu}
(see, for example, VanBeek et al., Biophys J. 92:4168), where C contains a variety of constants and \tilde{\nu} is the wave number, i.e., \lambda^{-1}.  But d \tilde{\nu} = -\lambda^{-2} d \lambda, so in wavelength form the integral ought to be
:  J = \int_0^\infty f_{\rm D}(\lambda) \, \epsilon_{\rm A}(\lambda) \, \lambda^2 \, d\lambda 
ought it not?  Or does someone have a reference that shows otherwise?
(One obtains the equation for R_0 by setting the energy transfer rate equal to the rate of all other decays.)
--Ichoran 15:58, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation for Overlap Integral? 

message: Is there any particular reason that the cartoon depicting FRET has titles that appear to be in Italian? "Nessun Segnale"?  "Segnale"?   --128.227.41.19 03:50, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cartoon oddness