Talk:Denver Pioneers

message: Some reason this shouldn't be merged? None of the University of Denver's other athletic programs have their own page, and to the best of my knowledge no school's hockey program does. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 17:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Get the chip off your shoulder. It doesn't help anything. The matter's been resolved, anyway. Articles with limited-scope content are often merged into parent articles whose scope will cover it and other topics. It's a common procedure. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 17:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I'll clarify. Alone, the content about the hockey team could easily fit in the University of Denver article. Unless it's of great length and development, it's almost always best for articles with limited scope to be included as sections in the parent article. Even if that length and development is eventually forthcoming, it's still best to have them in the parent article until that happens, at which point a brief summary would occur on the parent article and a link to the main article, this one. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 17:58, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How bout this, you guys re linked the page I created.  I was in process of creating a rather detailed page.  Not a simple entry.  I am pissed off that you guys would fuck over my idea with your Pollyanna bullshit.  The matter's been resolved? you guys didnt even let me finish.  You guys can eat shit and Fuck Wikipedia.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctrottnow (talk • contribs) 18:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a sentence at the bottom of the page when you make an edit that says If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed for profit by others, do not submit it. This is how wikipedia works. We are not trying to trash you or upset you, we are just attempting to help you make your article better. -Djsasso (talk) 18:07, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

text: editconflict Please read WP:OWN. We work together here at wikipedia. If you want to work unobstructed, do so in your userspace, such as User:Ctrottnow/sandbox. No one will intrude there unless you ask them to. I have a similar subspace for a work-in-progess myself, with plans to transfer it to the mainspace once it's complete. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 18:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Two things, we get the point and I totally agree with what you are trying to do and once it gets big enough to have its own article its more than welcome to. The only reason Minnesota and North Dakota have their own pages is because they got to big to leave on the Athletics department pages such as the one at Michigan Wolverines. As far as taking your work down, you are welcome to continue editing it but you did license it to wikipedia when you hit the submit button via GFDL. -Djsasso (talk) 18:14, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't want your help then.  You guys are Nerds and WikiFacists.  Leave my stuff alone.  --Ctrottnow (talk) 18:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well was nice working with you. -Djsasso (talk) 18:19, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No it wasn't, you didn't ask to change my stuff.  and what's amazing is how you changed it with it barely being on the web for five minutes.  Get a life!--Ctrottnow (talk) 18:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That is how wikipedia works, no one asks to work on any other page. Everyone works on anything. I only noticed it because it was brought up on the WP:HOCKEY talk page. I am not sure how he saw it so fast. -Djsasso (talk) 18:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was new page patrolling. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 18:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Merger to University of Denver

message: The redirection is off the table on this one, it is too big to be a subcategory on another site.  I will be updating the section under contruction soon.--Ctrottnow (talk) 21:39, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good. Good work. -Djsasso (talk) 21:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See, isn't that simpler than yelling and cursing and throwing a fit? Good job. Tromboneguy0186 (talk) 17:56, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I Like to do both, helps the creative juices--12.159.66.26 (talk) 17:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hokcey Site is now Up

message: It doesn't even mention, for example, when the school moved up from D-II to D-I. Maybe there should be a history of the school's D-II era in here as well?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.2.156.127 (talk) 20:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: More Information On The School's Division II Period