Talk:Education sciences

message: This section would be better as a link, unless or until other sections are similarly expanded. Scottmains (talk) 04:40, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Democratic Schools Section 

message: I support merging "Education theory" into "Philosophy of Education".  To me it means the exactly the same thing.  Even if it doesn't, there seems to be sufficient overlap in material to warrant a merger. Gregcaletta (talk) 01:42, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do not support.  Philosophy of science is not the same as a theoretical field of science (e.g., theoretical physics).  Likewise, philosophy of history is not the same as historiography, and philosophy of mathematics is not the same as any field of theoretical mathematics e.g., number theory.  The same is true for education.  Although the former in these cases generally require understanding of the latter, the reverse is not true.  --Lhakthong (talk) 21:53, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

text: No support. Philosophy of Education and Education Theory are two different academic fields of study, and Wikipedia should not be in the business of differentiating verifiable, long-standing academic standards simply because editors have not make adequate attempts at writing effectively enough to show the difference. On WP We Are Not Experts; we are editors. Let's find the information and write the difference, not make it up arbitrarily. • Freechildtalk 14:19, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The above post by Freechild may partially be in response to an earlier post of opinion that I put up. I have removed my opinion in light of what my current research is suggesting.  As I still think this discussion is important, I will post a later opinion once I have found some more conclusive sources.--Lexandalf (talk) 04:24, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: This list can get really, really long.  Perhaps we should create a list on its own page and/or just list contemporary/still-living theorists on this page?--Lhakthong (talk) 21:21, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Educational Theorists

message: I found an article that provides an interesting overview of the history of educational theory, and calls for people to stop worrying about educational theory.  I hope to work the content of it into this page if it does not get merged with Philosophy of education.
Carr, W. (2006). EDUCATION WITHOUT THEORY. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(2), 136-159. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00344.x.
Lexandalf (talk) 03:16, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New source

message: The sentence with the examples for the purposes of normative education gives instances which are POV. This is so as the source
of the information is the recent publications of Gov. of US DOE, which are politically biased. The most objectionable instance was 'change agent', which reeks of propaganda. However, the entire sentence was deleted as the examples are particularly modern and US-Centric. Considering the multitude of cultures and the varieties of schools and education systems therein, many of which are normative, the sentence is not reflective at all.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apurvasukant (talk • contribs) 08:35, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The examples were taken from a widely used textbook published in on a major educational press, not from the US DOE.  If you have examples to balance what you see as bias, perhaps examples form India or China, then add them.  Wikipedia inevitably has incomplete information…things are published by multiple editors, of which none has a complete global perspective.--Lhakthong (talk) 15:16, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

text: Please also note that wikipedia is not an ideological battle ground.  Ideally, the aim is to add information to balance what is seen as bias, not to delete information.--Lhakthong (talk) 21:04, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of 'Examples', under the para 'Educational Philosophies'. 

message: Do we have a verifiable authoritative source that lists the specific sub-groups in the article as subgroups of educational theory?  For example, the section on normative theories starts with a cited definition about what such a theory is in education.--Lhakthong (talk) 02:55, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub-groups 

message: Could we establish a Super-team to edit this article?Stmullin (talk) 16:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super-team 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Educational sciences. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726015042/http://www.eaea.org/index.php?k=15098 to http://www.eaea.org/index.php?k=15098
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It is a more more important subject of now condition to our education system it can do make some good so we need to think it. 103.98.129.82 (talk) 12:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  education science