Talk:Golden Brown

message: The coverart used in this article is a bootleg Russian flexidisk version  and not the official coverart (white text on brown background, or gold on brown on most reissues). And it seems these releases are considered official on the Love 30 article. Best change this. Korinkami 19:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Coverart

message: Hugh Cornwell has admitted in his autobiography that the song IS about heroin. TomGreen 14:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heroin 

message: :Image:Golden Brown.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:58, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Golden Brown.jpg

message: :Image:Golden Brown.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Golden Brown.jpg

message: Couldn't "Wind" (an outro of Naruto) be called a cover version of golden brown? I think to absolutely hear similar patterns.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.23.72.196 (talk) 06:38, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wind 

message: Is it significant, I wonder, that the word sphinx in Greek literally means strangler?
Nuttyskin (talk) 11:25, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sphinx 

message: "The song is a waltzing, harpsichord-led ballad alternating between 3/4 and 4/4. The song's characteristic opening phrase consists of three bars of 3/4 and one bar of 4/4" Not according to at least three separate publications of the sheet music, which has it constantly alternating between 6/8 and 7/8. Sheet 1 Sheet 2 Sheet 3 --Klock101 (talk) 20:59, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would suggest that the article needs changing then, with the sources you've linked to being used as inline references. I have to say, I've always thought it was in 6/8 time and not 3/4. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 01:42, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time signature 

message: The screen grab includes one baroque-style instrument (the harpsichord is probably a reproduction), the balance are entirely modern. If it were baroque then there would be no drum kit and the double bass would be a violone. Guy (Help!) 23:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "baroque" instruments 

message: There is a whole section about Bill Turnbull waltzing to it and claiming it was a disaster because of the alternating 4/4 3/4, but from a video of the performance the 4/4 measure is absent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.75.115.38 (talk) 11:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Turnbull 

message: The song was used in the BBC Classic Animal Tracks TV series as a background music for a cheetah. It's almost impossible to find this series anywhere! Harjasusi (talk) 19:25, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC Classic Animal Tracks 

message: You pity me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:899:2920:AD79:B887:38AE:1A8F (talk) 22:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No mention of Dave Brubeck Quartet 

message: Singer/Songwriter/Producer FrankMusik sampled the track for his 2009 Complete Me album track “When You’re Around”. In 2022, he produced a full cover of the track and a reproduction of his 2009 album track, this time sampling his own cover.
Mcnaugha (talk) 14:47, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FrankMusik 2009 sample, then 2022 cover and re-sample 

message: The song has been described as having the intro portion (and similar sections) in several different but similar time signatures. The numbers I see in the sources are  ; alternating measures of  and  (adding up to 13); and three measures of  plus one of  (adding up to 13). All of these are close enough to be mentioned. The source saying  is a staff-penned assessment by AllMusic, but nobody looking at the music would agree that it is actually 13 beats in one measure. The AllMusic description is more of an impression, I think, but still interesting to our readers.
The song's sheet music is always in printed as  plus a bit of . There is no reason why we should purposely misrepresent the song as having 13 beats per measure when it doesn't. Binksternet (talk) 18:19, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Any information on a Wikipedia page needs to be supported by reliable published sources. If all the sources say it is 13/8 then, as far as Wikipedia is concerning it is 13/8. MrMajors (talk) 07:22, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Your preferred source has a fatal contradiction. It says "For a start it's in 13/8 time, three bars of 3/4 time" which is complete nonsense. According to WP:CONTEXTMATTERS, your source fails to bring the required reliability to this issue. Wikipedia does not require us to cling to wrong facts in the face of correct information. Binksternet (talk) 15:12, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: My source, the composer, "fails to bring the required reliability", yet the sheet music (credited to the same person) is a valid source? You can't have it both ways. MrMajors (talk) 16:32, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The composer is being casually interviewed, not tested and graded on accuracy. In the interview, he mixes up his time signatures, flipping back and forth between various /8 and /4 signatures without a care, as if they are the same. Of course they are not. Binksternet (talk) 17:26, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: A book co-written by the composer dedicated to a song by song analysis of their music isn't a casual interview. MrMajors (talk) 19:51, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No matter the source, the composer is stating impossibilities. Per WP:CONTEXTMATTERS, we are not required to follow him off the cliff. Binksternet (talk) 07:54, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time signature?