Talk:Doc Blanchard

message: This article has been tagged for the military history project, however, I do not believe that this is correct. The article is focused almost entirely on this subject's football career. The subject may have been in the military, but the article mentions very little about his service career and it seems that his notability comes from being a football player, not his military service. As such I believe that the mil history tag should be removed. Does anyone else agree or disagree? If it is to stay linked to the military history project the article should be greatly expanded to discuss his military career in much more detail. AustralianRupert (talk) 05:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering he is one of the most famous players in U.S. college football history, and did so while playing for the Army Black Knights at the United States Military Academy West Point leading Army to 3 national football championships in a row - all in conjunction with serving in the military as a fighter pilot and retired a Colonel - I certainly believe he's within the project's scope. Perhaps you should raise this on the project's talk page and get feed back there. - ℅ ✰ALLST☆R✰ echo 05:54, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll post a notice at the project regarding this issue so that the project members can join in this discussion and give guidance. - ℅ ✰ALLST☆R✰ echo 05:58, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Seems reasonable to have him within Milhist scope to me. His involvement with the military was more than incidental.  Roger Davies talk 06:28, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, clearly the subject had a long military career but my point is that the focus of the article is not military at all. There is one sentence devoted to his military service and nothing to suggest that he performed anything of note. If it weren't for his football career, would he not qualify as a non-notable person and therefore not qualify for a biography on wikipedia at all? If I clicked on the article expecting an outline of the subject's military career I would be sorely disappointed. Are we supposed to include the biography of every person who achieves notability for non military aspects of their life just because they previously served? Thus, should we include Don Bradman in the military history project because he served during World War II? If we were to do that a lot of people with thoroughly non-notable military careers would then qualify for a military history tag. AustralianRupert (talk) 06:55, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Did Don Bradman graduate from a military educational institution and become a legend there? No, but Doc Blanchard did. Anyway, apparently we crossed paths (you posting here while I was still editing the article). Check out the article now. I have expanded on his military service. - ℅ ✰ALLST☆R✰ echo 08:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Be Bold this is a start class article - By having the Military service section it will encourage editors to contribute to it. If the section was not there would anyone bother ?  I also believe its in scope for WP;MILHIST --Jim Sweeney (talk) 10:52, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

text: Well, his number has been retired at West Point... so it seems reasonable for MILHIST... 76.66.196.218 (talk) 11:26, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, concensus seems to be against me on this, so it is probably time for me to retire gracefully. The expanded military career additions are a good start, and as Jim said above, leaving the Mil Hist tag on probably encourages work on the article. Good luck with the GA review, by the way. AustralianRupert (talk) 01:25, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mil hist tag 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). Various sentences had been pasted in this article verbatim from: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/21/sports/ncaafootball/21blanchard.html http://www.thestate.com/scathletes/story/620947.html and other sources. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:15, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Though his father was not a physician, it seems Doc Kuhn too was first called "Little Doc." It is not often one sees a "Felix Anthony." Do we know whence came Blanchard's ancestors? Cake (talk) 18:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Little Doc" 

message: Substituted at 13:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment comment 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Doc Blanchard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.goarmysports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=11100&ATCLID=3725083
*Added  tag to http://www.footballfoundation.com/news.php?id=1902
*Added  tag to http://www.ncaa.com/sports/m-footbl/spec-rel/042009aaa.html
*Added  tag to http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/MYSA091306_01A_FBCblanchard_3590878_html2898.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060112071434/http://www.sccotton.org:80/blanchard.htm to http://www.sccotton.org/blanchard.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.thestate.com/scathletes/story/620947.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Doc Blanchard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110123163742/http://usarmyallamericanbowl.com/awards.php to http://www.usarmyallamericanbowl.com/awards.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Doc Blanchard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.hickoksports.com/biograph/blnchrdc.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090102133638/http://www.databasefootball.com/draft/draftyear.htm?yr=1946&lg=nfl to http://www.databasefootball.com/draft/draftyear.htm?lg=NFL&yr=1946
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified