lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Trade dollar

message: See Talk:Trade Dollar for the reason for the reverts.--293.xx.xxx.xx 11:03, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: There should not be two pages, Trade Dollar and Trade dollar. I don't know if one of them should be renamed to United States trade dollar or if they should be merged. Does anyone who is more interested in the topic want to fix it? Ingrid 23:37, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The first article will be at trade dollar, not at Trade Dollar, per our capitalisation guidelines. —Nightstallion (?) 12:47, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Better? :-) Bobby I'm Here, Are You There? 02:03, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trade Dollar and Trade dollar 

message: "Collectors are warned that recently a large number of U.S. Trade dollars have been forged in China."
This "buyer beware" warning is most welcoming to collectors. But this warning must be substantiated by evidence what the authentic and the fake looks like. Differences typically such as mint, year, design, quality of relief or metal, weight and size, color or even ring sound, must be pointed out to load the dice above. 
Otherwise the allegation is a paradigm of "give a dog a bad name ..." crap often hurled by dealers and losers in the direction of China in a trade war that started with gunboats loaded with opium in the mid-1800s in light of the new China century. The corollary held by dealers is "mine is real and prized; others forged and garbage".
To be fair. I myself have personally come across a .999 shining white silver proof quality of a Britannia Straits Dollar. Is this reproduction a fake? Is this a good enough evidence to hang China when the coin is put for sale at $100 by a Chinese dealer in Toronto or San Francisco Chinatown? 
Coins afterall is man-made, reproduction is not at all impossible. Is coin forging as easy as making fortune cookies or photocopies of banknotes in the basement of New York Chinatown?
Sam  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.31.17.135 (talk) 20:58, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sam
Talk:Half cent (United States coin)

message: Was this coin ever referred to by the nickname for the British analogue, ha'penny?  --Xyzzyva 03:15, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Everyone I know calls them "heypennies"...2601:806:4301:C100:715E:F0D4:544A:F17B (talk) 23:02, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicknames 

message: The article mentions how the coin is similar in worth to the current dime. How true is that though? I've heard plenty of stories (accurate ones) of items like a whole pizza costing 5 to 10 cents. That's 10 to 20 half-cent coins. You certainly can not buy a pizza for $1-2. So is it really similar in worth to a dime? Not sure I agree with that. Seems more like the worth in the range of $0.50-$1 than anything else.
10:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What years are the comparison suppose to be? 1843 and 2004, 1799-1976 etc it should be deleted if no reference is provided. Enlil Ninlil (talk) 04:21, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Really worth a dime? 

message: I know there were none in 1837, but I read in The Red Book that merchants issued private tokens in 1837, should this be in the article, and is it possible to obtain a picture of it? --Coingeek (talk) 01:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: No half cents-1837?

message: Really? Does no one know how thick a half-cent coin is?98.101.136.218 (talk) 20:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Thickness=???

message: Does this article qualify as a stub? it is very light in content.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.163.58.231 (talk) 01:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub Tag 

message: Should the two articles be connected in some way?--Ant2242 (talk) 18:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  5 Mill = 1/2 cent
Talk:Radio France

message: Changed Radio France Logo to 2006 version - sourced from French Wikipedia --Mgill 06:41, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: * https://www.radiofrance.fr/data/streams XMLHttpRequest   
:.... 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 07:18, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ALL Radio France Live Streams
Talk:The Million Dollar Homepage

message: Change 2019 to 2009 Joseph10545 (talk) 02:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. All of the 2019s appear correct. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:54, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 April 2022
Talk:Nicholas Briggs

message: In the article it states that the future incarnation of the Doctor he provided the model for proved to be false, iirc & as I understand it, while the story arc involving the 8th regenerating into that incarnation was a deception, there was a previous appearance by this future incarnation in a 7th Doctor strip where he had a different companion than those during the time of the deception. Since this would seem to place it outside the time of the false Doctor and that the companion of the future Doctor treats him as authentic, this strongly suggests to me that the 8th Doctor and Shayde based their false incarnation on their knowledge of this particular 'true' (or 'possible' at the very least) future incarnation (in the context of the DWM strips).Number36 00:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DWM False future Doctor

message: Nicholas was playing a cabinet minister called Richard? --Mattmm (talk) 21:55, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Children of Earth
Talk:Seamus Twomey

message: Twomey supported the bombing of civilian targets. On 29 October 1977, for example, a no-warning bomb at an Italian restaurant in Mayfair killed one diner and wounded 17 others. Three more people were killed in similar blasts in Chelsea and Mayfair the following month. As Twomey explained: “By hitting Mayfair restaurants, we were hitting the type of person that could bring pressure to bear on the British government”.
I removed the above. I'm placing the text here is case anyone manages to find a source for it. None have been forthcoming in two years. Stu ’Bout ye! 11:19, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  http://cain.ulst.ac.uk/events/truce/kelley88.htm#ends Basket Feudalist  08:59, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced content removed
Talk:Find A Grave Forums

message: While the Forums are related to the main site, in my opinion they are very different in nature and not the same at all as the main site. There are many folks that are much more active in the forums for the very spirit of community and exchange with others interest in 'graving' that do not participate much on the main site. Then there are other very active members on the main site that do not even belong to and have never been to the Forums.
They require a separate registration to participate while both can be viewed without signing up.  Doc 00:55, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

message: Okidoki, Doc.  Please expand the article then to establish notability.  As it reads right now, IMO, it's just like any other website on the topic.  Without references, you risk the article being tagged for deletion. -- Perfecto 17:52, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Dutch euro coins

message: There reads: As in Finland, most of the Dutch shops have decided not to issue one and two cent coins starting from September 1, 2004.
So, shops issue the coins? I thought the banks issue coins. Isn't that where the money is obtained from? And I think that here in Finland, you can't get 1-cent or 2-cent coins even from a bank. Although it is possible to pay with them, if you get them from other countries. 82.141.94.123 (talk) 01:58, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, shops can issue coins. When they get rolls from their banks and use the coins from these rolls as change for their customers they issue these coins. I.e. they bring them into circulation. Tvx1 (talk) 04:02, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  issuing 

message: The section only has 2010 figures as the latest, and 2011 row has "**", which means 'data not available yet'. I wonder how long that has been there, because more than 2 3/4 years have passed since 2011. Quite hard to believe that 2011 numbers (and actually 2012 & 2013, too) would not have been published by now. 212.50.203.198 (talk) 13:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the table up to the lasted published figures and added another source. I must say that these tables are hopelessly outdated over all the euro countries' articles. Tvx1 (talk) 04:00, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but Euro gold and silver commemorative coins (Netherlands) only has coins to 2009. So there is 5 whole years missing. As all the gold & silver coins pages seem to have. 212.50.203.198 (talk) 19:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  newer figures to "Circulating Mintage quantities"
Template talk:Toronto Stock Exchange

message: There is a need for a template exactly like this TSX Stock template, but without the automatic categorization to :Category:Companies traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange that occurs when this template is linked to.  This need would be for instances when the template is desired for use on article talk pages, or for templates that exist on multiple articles.  For example, because the tsx template was called on this talk page, Template talk: Tsx is now in :Category:Companies traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange, and if the tsx template was added to for example Template:CanWest Global Communications, all articles linked to in that template would also automatically be put into :Category:Companies traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange.  So, two actions could be taken: The code that automatically categorizes any page that calls this TSX template into Category:Companies traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange could be removed, or, a second TSX template could be created that provides the same function as this one without the automatic categorization.  If the first option is chosen, we would need to ensure that all articles calling the template are manually put into Category:Companies traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange.  Thoughts and comments on this matter? Kurieeto 12:51, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As per the precedent of Template:Nasdaq and Template:Ndaq, I've created Template:Tsx2 to be used when the auto-categorization provided by Template:Tsx is not desirable. Kurieeto 20:53, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

text: The templates previously used on this page have been replaced by the "2" version to avoid categorization. Shawnc 22:09, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: TSX2

message: Could this be modified to include more than one ticker symbol?  The template on Canadian Tire doesn't enable it to show the CTC and CTC.A stocks. Lexicon (talk) 22:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple symbols
Talk:Mahoraba

message: Just a little thing about the character Momono Megumi: In  the anime, at least, she does seem to have a lot of DVDs, and also to love films, but it is implied that she specifically likes bad films, and that her collection of DVDs is entirely made of just crappy movies (example: In a chapter she goes crazy over watching an obviously badly made school movie whose DVD she even bought to add to her collection). Now, since I have not read the manga, I can't really write anything of it in the article, so I write it down here so that someone who know both stories can confirm if this fact is true in only one or both versions of the series.
Oy, I read up on the manga, and yeah I can confirm that Momono does indeed have a soft spot for bad horror movies in her collection of DVDs.
--Tarranon 04:18, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know anything about the little family of dancing CGI nurikabe that show up everywhere in the anime? Does that represent the author, or what? --Darksasami 20:51, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  CGI nurikabe? 

message: The edits were not vandalism. I don't know why they were reverted to a previous version but I have added them back. They are good and valid content. --Squilibob 06:28, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits by 24.4.105.240 

message: Manga version's title is just まほらば ("Mahoraba"). "Heartful days" is only appended Anime version. I think that this article is wrong about it. --Kkkdc (@jawiki) 14:30, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manga Title 

message: In Episode 20, Momomo and Sayoko play an unnamed piano and violin duet - is it an actual piece of music, or just something made up for the anime? if it is, there could be a trivia section for it if it references a real piece of music, etc. does anyone know? Dagari 13:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Please help

message: In episode 19 (Everyone's Day), Yamabuki Tsubasa shows Shiratori a piece of paper showing his theme for their art assignment given by their teacher. This note shocks Shiratori when he reads it. The note is not translated, but on the top of the screen in the fansub, it says to go to http://vagrant.anime.org to see what it says. There is no longer (or ever was) a website with that name. Even if you replace the first dot with a dash. This note shocks Shiratori when he reads it. Does anybody know what that note said?
DreamScenario 19:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode 19 Note?
Talk:Hex168

message: It is too early to say that it really is Microsoft, but it sure seems like it.  Maybe upload the shots here?  DoomBringer 06:10, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unknowns

message: This page had some bad grammar and such... I edited it to be better looking, in general.  Grammar and content is better.  Will add "current events" tag. DoomBringer 22:38, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed the thing up 

message: Is this article really necessary? Hex 168 is nothing more than a pomotional contest for a product giveaway, not even an "alternate reality game" (yet another term for "marketing ploy").  Aside from the information already mentioned at the Xbox 360 article, the Hex168 article includes nothing but speculation.  I'm going to make this into a redirect.  --Anetode 23:47, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Kreuzer

message: Neither this article nor the one about the Brazilian cruzeiro mention where the name came from.
Why the cross in the name ?
Can someone expand, pls?70.54.202.152 (talk) 16:25, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe because of the depicted cross? See :File:KreuzerBern.jpg. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:28, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name?
Talk:Historical coins and banknotes of Poland

message: Take a look at http://www.nbp.gov.pl/home.aspx?f=disclaimer_banknoty_en.htm
It seems that it is not OK to reproduce Polish banknotes.  Should this article be deleted? Silversmith  Hewwo 04:58, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That should be taken up with each individual image, whoever uploaded it and the correspomding copyright tags attached to them.  Joe  I 06:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Georgian lari

message: Does anyone have information on the original tetri?Dove1950 18:22, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does South Ossetia uses Georgian lari? --Chochopk 17:11, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Ossetia 

message: Does Georgia plan on releasing any commemorative coinage to honor the most stable, sane, honorable, and respected Georgian ever to live, Joseph Stalin?  68.189.255.6
:Never. Georgia will never honor its most unstable, unhonorable, and despised Georgia who destroyed his homeland's freedom and exterminated the best part of Georgian society. --Kober 05:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stalin 

message: Georgia Issues Banknotes with Sokhumi Images --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 02:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  200 lari 

message: Frequently used or rarely used?  They were removed from one list but not added to the other.  Since they exist, they belong in one or the other.  Not R (talk) 13:54, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, since it was an anonymous edit that removed them, I'll go ahead and revert that edit to restore them to the "rarely used" list. Not R (talk) 03:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  1 and 2 lari banknotes
Talk:1980-1982 Ford Thunderbird

message: I've always wondered why this article was separate from the main Thunderbird article. I can see how the 1980 T-Bird was so different than previous models, but in my opinion, all of the information on this page can be crammed onto the T-Bird article, which would make this article redundant. --ApolloBoy 01:18, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:List of awards presented by the governor general of Canada

message: I think perhaps some of these awards are not appropriate for this page.  For example the Governor General does not distribute the Royal Victorian Medal, it is the gift of soverign for services rendered.  The Governor General is the principal Dame Grand Cross of the Order of St. John but I dont think she presents the order. Dowew 01:40, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Dowew, the main reason not all the entries match the scope of the article is that there are No references for this list. Until(1 == 2) 13:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Unless this article is referenced to show that each entry meets the scope of the article I am going to start deleting entries. Or, if as it is now, deleting uncited entries would blank the page, I will AfD it.
What is more, this is merely a list that does not provide any encyclopedic content. This would serve better as a category than an article unless it is used to provide cited information regarding the entry. Until(1 == 2) 13:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you want, you can add links to the specific pages in that site, for example Order of Canada , Order of Miltary Merit ,  	 Order of Merit of the Police Forces  and so on. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 03:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Affine involution

message: Patrick  restored the text I deleted with the comment: "rv deletion, not clear where info was moved to, if at all". I guess I should have clarified better why I deleted it. 
But first, I would like to say that there is nothing wrong with deleting text. Actually, sometimes it is highly useful. It is like pruning a tree, you remove information sometimes which is not essential, or not well written, so that the remaining text is of overall better quality. 
The section ==Affine involutions== in the article is badly written. It starts with general characerizaton of affine involutions, it goes to characterization of isometric involutions, and jumps back to the characterization of affine involutions in 3D. Three pieces of information with unclear transitions between each other, and inconsistent with the title of the section. The text starting with "The other isometries are inversion" goes into a much more level of detail than everything else in that section, which is bad style (one loses track of the overall spirit of the section when getting bogged down into details).
That is to say, this section is an amalgam of information which is correct in individual pieces, but fitting rather badly together. The only solution I was able to come of with is trim some stuff, so that what is left is better written. If you can come up with a better solution, please do so. If you fail to come up with a solution, I will trim the text again. Again, one should not sacrifice the general scructure and readability of an article for the sake of putting all kinds of true information. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 01:40, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You deleted info about an important special case. That is very inappropriate. If you think the info fits better in another existing article or in a new article than you should move it.--Patrick 11:03, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I thought I made my point above. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 11:06, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You mix up two questions: whether it is useful info, and if so, where it can best be put.--Patrick 11:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  You are right of course. That's why I asked for a better arrangement above. Glad you did it eventually. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 11:30, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Golden share

message: Why do we need to know how to say "golden share" in Russian? Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 01:40, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The initial article was created to explain Zolotaya Aktsiya, and later it was supplememted with Golden Share in other countries. I have zero familiarity with the subject, but I feel like you've got a point here, since Google gives only 133 hits for that. Probably it should be moved as a minor note in the paragraph about Russia, since there is a redirect(you know those newspapers starting articles with introduction to a foreign word, so just in case someone will seek explanation after reading that sort of thing)–Gnomz007(?) 04:28, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Did that myself.–Gnomz007(?) 04:33, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why "golden share" in Russian?

message: This was commented on the article page, I've moved it here:
A golden share can veto all other shares and can be useful in takeover bids....Since most companies have to live with the risk of takeover bids, this seemed rather unfair...
(not sure if its possible with Russian golden shares)
http://www.likvidation.ru/Public/20040203134643Public.html - analisys in Russian 
 —Cliffb 07:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commented Section 
Talk:Less-than-truckload shipping

message: The hotshot DAB links to here, and the Trucking industry in the United States article's description of "HotShot" sounds like its related to this topic. If it is, ideally this article would either have hotshot as an alternate title (i.e. in bold) or would explain what a hotshot is (if it's not a simple synonym for LTL). -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 00:41, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hotshot? 

message: @Voidxor regarding your revert see WP:SDESC which says "A short description is not a definition" but rather "a very brief indication of the field covered by the article". The problem with the current short description is that it grossly exceeds the recommended length of 40 characters meaning that it will be truncated to something like "Transportation of an amount of freight b...". rblv (talk) 18:10, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for the explanation. I think it's best practice to state your reason for making a change in your edit summary. My main concern—as I stated in my edit summary—is that everything here is a "term", so that's a waste of 4 or 5 characters in my opinion. Even so, I think I can find a good middle ground between the 85 characters that were there, and the 22 characters that you had. Give me a minute. — voidxor 18:57, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

text: How about "An amount of freight in shipping"? — voidxor 19:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  That sounds good to me. rblv (talk) 23:25, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  , thanks. — voidxor 13:13, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short description