Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Judaism/Archive 2

message: Dovi please do not be intimidated by RK's personal insults, attacks, threats or bullying tactics. Unfortunately RK has a poor reputation on Wikipedia when it comes to respecting the rights of others on Wikipedia in general. For examples, even though the contexts were different, but RK always functions in controversial ways that have seem him partially banned at times. See Wikipedia:Requests for comment/RK: "user:RK's aggressive editing tactics in the Wikipedian community of reverting articles, engaging in personal attacks in edit summaries, trying to goad editors into flaming him, trying to goad editors into wasting time engaging in edit wars over his reverts, and RK's use of editing tactics that should be classified as vandalism, even if they are currently not classified as vandalism. -- John Gohde, aka Mr-Natural-Health 05:22, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Josiah, now what a great JOKE that is!!! What would you call that in psychological terms, inversion or projection? Pretty pathetic Josiah when you begin to "imagine" that I am someone else out there. Wow. Shows how out of perspective you are. Too bad. So far my record on Wikipedia is excellent. I work hard at it and do my NPOV job. IZAK 05:44, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice to Dovi about RK's "tactics" 

message: Pardon me if i'm wrong, but I was under the impression that the discussions of this project (and other wikipedia discussions) were supposed to stay on Wikipedia. Is it appropriate to put it on a blog, without notification of the people involved? http://simshalom.blogspot.com/
:Well, all contributions to Wikipedia are protected by the terms of GNU Free Documentation License.  IZAK has the right to use the content as long as he follows the rules of the license. - Gilgamesh 2:07, 17 July 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, maybe nothing.  I'm fine with it.  I keep in mind that everything I post anywhere on Wikipedia becomes subject to the GNU Free Documentation License.  In short (but not complete details), it means that you are free to copy content here, as long as you adhere to the terms of the license (requiring it to be free information), and make the license readily available in all derivative works.  So, if you post it on your blog, you need a copy of the license and adhere to it.  And anyone who copies that blog will need a copy of the license too and adhere to it as well.  The GNU FDL ensures that free information remains perpetually free, so it restricts making it proprietary.  All information posted at Wikipedia becomes covered under the GNU FDL as a condition for it being posted.  So I suppose all you need to ensure is that the logs you post on your blog are posted with a disclamation of the GNU FDL, and a requirement that anyone who copies the text must also read it and adhere to it. - Gilgamesh 23:17, 19 July 2004 (UTC)

text: I'll be honest IZAK. Mainly I'm annoyed because you lied to me when you said you had only posted certain argument about Karaism a while back on my user talk page, and the Jew talk page, when in fact you also posted it to your blog as I recentely found out, and other areas.--Josiah 03:25, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  IZAK spamming his arguments to his blog