Talk:British Rail Class 172

message: According to the  barking - Gospel Oak Line User Group they have been told that a 2 car version of this class will be used on the GOBLIN 62.49.61.203 21:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry forgot to log in Wilmot1 21:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Can we have a reference for the speed? - I can't find one but I head that it's 75mph and not 100. 82.36.81.159 19:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably htey will be the same as the normal 170's (ie 100mph), otherwise i could mean they will have diffrent gearing ??? Pickle 17:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed 

message: Do we know the reason for the 9th London Overground unit? Are they giving the GOBLIN an extra unit or do they have some other use planned for it? At the moment the article seems to contradict itself. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:00, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is only going to be 8 London Overground units according to Bombardier. Unisouth (talk) 10:11, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  8 or 9? 

message: It would be useful to have a section explaining the difference between a 172 and a 170 or 171. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:49, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences 

message: The article says that Chiltern Railways will have 172/1s and later that CR's trains will not have the tripcock. The RH panel says 172/1s will have tripcock.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.49.185 (talk) 21:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  172/1s and tripcock 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/east-westlink/
*:Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:52, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on British Rail Class 172. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090913165925/http://www.old-dalby.com/present.htm to http://www.old-dalby.com/present.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:33, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on British Rail Class 172. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151210204147/http://www.porterbrook.co.uk/downloads/brochures/172%20Brochure.pdf to http://www.porterbrook.co.uk/downloads/brochures/172%20Brochure.pdf
*Added  tag to http://cw-railpic.fpic.co.uk/p68624467.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070821224858/http://www.barking-gospeloak.org.uk/temp_page2.htm to http://www.barking-gospeloak.org.uk/temp_page2.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110518202101/http://www.porterbrook.com/pages/press_releases/131207.html to http://www.porterbrook.com/pages/press_releases/131207.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090209031225/http://www.westofengland.org/transport/rail to http://www.westofengland.org/transport/rail
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on British Rail Class 172. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110924201533/http://www.londonmidland.com/news/latest-news/london-midland-launches-93m-train-fleet-for-snow-hill-line/ to http://www.londonmidland.com/news/latest-news/london-midland-launches-93m-train-fleet-for-snow-hill-line/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :British Rail Class 172's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "TRC1":
From British Rail Class 120: 
From British Rail Class 151: 
From British Rail Class 129: 
From British Rail Class 128: 
From British Rail Class 143: 
From British Rail Class 155: 
From British Rail Class 122: 
From British Rail Class 124: 
From British Rail Class 141: 
From British Rail Class 144: 
From British Rail Class 142: 
From British Rail Class 156: 
From British Rail Class 158: 
From British Rail Class 150: 
From British Rail Class 153: 
From British Rail Class 508: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:British Rail Class 172]]