Talk:Sikorsky H-5

message: Substituted at 06:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Sikorsky H-5. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110606061937/http://www.rtaf.mi.th/museum/BLDG5-2.HTM to http://www.rtaf.mi.th/museum/BLDG5-2.HTM
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:15, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The original versions of the R-5, including the YR-5A, R-5A, R-5D, and HO2S-1, all came from Sikorsky's S-48 model, while the later S-51 model was the basis for the H-5F, H-5G, H-5H, and HO3S-1. There are distinct differences between these two models, the most obvious of which is the landing gear configuration: two forward wheels and a tail wheel on the S-48 models (with a small nose wheel added to the R-5D) versus two rear wheels and a nose wheel on the S-51 models. The window layout is also distinctly different between the two models. You can see the difference if you compare the infobox picture (a YR-5A at the USAF museum) with the other pictures in the article. I'll try to make the distinction a bit clearer in the article. --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 19:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I think I've managed to better distinguish the S-48 versions from the S-51 versions. --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 08:52, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs clearer distinction of original S-48 models from later S-51 models. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sikorsky H-5. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161105031344/http://www.armyaviationmuseum.org/index.php/museum/aircraft-collection/16-aircraft-collection/65-rotary-wing to http://www.armyaviationmuseum.org/index.php/museum/aircraft-collection/16-aircraft-collection/65-rotary-wing
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061207214641/http://www.dna.gov.ar/DIVULGAC/HELO.HTM to http://www.dna.gov.ar/DIVULGAC/HELO.HTM
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: Okay, the H-5 had greater payload capacity than the R-4. What was it? Since neither this page, nor the R-4 page, ever mentions it for either of them.  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 02:55, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Jane's All the World's Aircraft 1951/52 gives a "disposable load" of 1505 lb for an S-51 with composite, 58 ft diameter rotor blades, or 1695 lb with all metal blades (59 foot diameter) - the empty and loaded weights don't quite line up with those currently quoted in the specifications, although the 58 ft rotor diameter suggests composite blades.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:00, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thx. That looks like fuel, stores, & all. Polmar's Military Helicopters of the World (my go-to, because I have it ;p ) doesn't say anything... :(  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 17:16, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carry me