lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The March (novel)

message: I am bothered by 72.8.95.36's rewriting of the article. I looks canned (though I don't find it in a google search) with some rather POV analysis. Also, some relevent info seems to have been removed. Other opinions? -- Infrogmation (talk) 04:31, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you are referring to me, and in the interest of disclosure, I can explain this.  This newer "canned" entry was taken verbatim by me from the unpublished but upcoming Encyclopedia of Jewish American Literature.  See here:  However, I was the one that wrote the article for said Encyclopedia before posting it here.  At the time I posted this, I didn't know if the encyclopedia was going to be published, and so I posted it here, since it was more thorough than the article that existed. Therefore it is not plagiarism, since I wrote it.  I do not recall ever signing any official release of copyright, though.  So I think it is OK to remain here--unless someone from the publisher reads the article and thinks that their entry has been plagiarized from here! Phrenology (talk) 04:47, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the explanation. As long as you didn't make some sort of agreement that someone else has exclusive copyright on what you wrote, I imagine its fine on avoiding any plagerism or copyright problem.  I had some concern with some material previously in the article removed, but if no other editors here are bothered, I shan't be either. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:44, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Yissachar Shlomo Teichtal

message: I continue to appreciate the changes made by other contributors.  Very nice, and exactly what this project is all about. As I edit this comment, more than ten years after the original article was posted, I am grateful for all the work others have put into making this article, and Wikipedia, such a force for good in the world. I knew nothing about the mechanics of creating a page, and still know precious little. However, others were good enough to build on my attempt, and the end result is extraordinary.  Thanks again.
I see that someone found a photograph of Rabbi Teichtal.  I am going to take a picture of his book and add it to the linked article about it.
  
mrperkins 02:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [The Work of Others]

message: The lead paragraph states that R' Teichtal was one of the first to break ranks with European Orthodoxy on the issue of Zionism.  Seeing that he wrote Em HaBanim at such a late period in the development of Zionisim, I find this hard to believe.  I am not an expert in this area of history, but I recall other rabbinical figures such as Rav Kook and Yitzhak Herzog being pro zionist around the same time.  I'm sure there were earlier figures as well. (Huberfamily 00:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead Paragraph

message: It would be nice to have a section on R' Teichtal's family and decendants.  (Huberfamily 00:52, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Family

message: His name was Yisochor. When did he change it to Yisachar?--Redaktor 22:57, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Nyrdhaa? What's that? There's no such town in Hungary. It can be Nyíregyháza.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.121.57.44 (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nyrdhaa? 
Talk:Kawasaki Z500/Z550

message: I couldn't believe that there wasn't a page for the Kawasaki GPz550.  Eventually I found this page and realized that the GPz550 was also known as the ZX550 and was covered here.  I created a GPz550 page and had it redirect here so that GPz550 fans can add their information and build this article.  Perhaps the same should be done for the KZ550? Respectfully, SamBlob 02:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Created a GPz550 redirect page
Talk:Lancia Montecarlo

message: This article needs a reshuffle of somekind, It Jumps strait from the introduction to info on a sub model only available in the US, then goes into a section about problems with it. Logically it should start with history, and info on the US model should be towards the end. (82.3.45.126 (talk) 00:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Lancia Montecarlo was not based on the Abarth 030, both cars were developed directly from project X1/20YBSOne (talk) 17:30, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abarth 030 Pininfarina 

message: Updated production number stated by Pininfarina production records
From 1981 to 1982 they built 220 "Fiat Lancia Beta Montecarlo Corse" I suspect it could be the 037 Stradale.YBSOne (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pininfarina production records 

message: Interestingly the British advertising in the UK in 1977 called the car Beta Monte-Carlo (note the hyphen) so note quite as per the article. Was this used elsewhere or just a British quirk? <B>Warren</B> (talk) 12:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Must be a singular quirk, all UK brochures for sale that I saw spelled "Montecarlo". YBSOne (talk) 16:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Thomas E. Watson

message: Why isn't his party listed next to his name?  Is it because no one wants to admit that the Democrat Party was heavily associated with the KKK?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.251.213.9 (talk) 17:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Watson statue is being removed from a prime location, in front of the capitol, to make way for the newly authorized statue of MLK. Tyrone Brooks was one of the proponents for the new statue, and his agitation regarding the Watson statue can be seen as an effort to free up the space. No reliable source on that, at the moment, so those comments should not be added to the article. If the Watson statue were as "highly controversial" as one editor asserted, it would have been removed completely. As it is, the statue is simply being relocated to the other side of the street, facing the Capitol. Gulbenk  (talk) 22:19, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of Statue
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-12-21 Street Fighter character articles

message: Apparently someone disagrees with the outcome of this cabal: . Patstuarttalk|edits 02:53, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tis their prerogative.  Eventually the relevant wikiproject will agree on a style that spans all of their articles.  For now the Street Fighter version of this debate is slowly crawling towards being solved.  I've invited that person to join this discussion; every new opinion makes the decision-making process better.  Flakeloaf 07:17, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Y'all might be interested 

message: I've responded to the last comments, but the Genryusai saga deserves attention too.  Perhaps after a night's sleep I'll be able to articulate it. Flakeloaf 19:51, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chatter
Template talk:Rare

message: I added the Battletoads series to the template. I'm not sure why they weren't there to begin with. --Thaddius 04:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battletoads 

message: This navbox has a rather large amount of links in it. Since most (if not all) of the series have navboxes of their own, isn't it redundant to have this template on the page with the series' template? I feel the template should be changed to only list each of the non-series games' articles (in the "Other Games" section) and each series' main articles. ♦TH1RT3EN talk ♦ contribs 19:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is slightly unnecessary. I am going to try to change it so that the infobox links to the series. If you think its no good, discuss it's here. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rmsuperstar99 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bloated 

message: I decided to make a Template for Grabbed by the Ghoulies, since if there was ever to be a second game in the works, then it would most likely become another franchise for Rare. There were even conversation talks that a sequel to Ghoulies was considered to be in the works, according to the Rare staff, but so far, it has never been confirmed, so it's unlikely that there will be a sequel at this point. But I did make the template just in case.
BlueMario1016 (talk) 15:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grabbed by the Ghoulies
Talk:Bolaji Badejo

message: I found a source saying he's Maasai and that's what this said until October. Why the change to Yoruba and which is right? --T. Anthony 02:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maasai 

message: I realize the chances of anyone having a solid answer for this is pretty unlikely, given we can't even agree on the heights of wrestlers, but the article currently gives two different heights. Let's at least get some cites for those heights.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.186.125 (talk) 05:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The first footnote links to a site that says he was 2.18 metres, which is 7'2". The rest of the article then describes him as 6'10". So Wikipedia.Tirailleur (talk) 10:20, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Height

message: The article says he was an artist, but I never managed to find any of his art online. --186.242.243.153 (talk) 03:59, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where can I see his art?
Talk:Pride and Glory (film)

message: Plot appear to be way too long. — Ched (talk) 14:42, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the whole "Plot" section since it was far too long to even have a temporary presence in this article.  If the original one is to be shortened or a new one to be written, follow the guidelines at WP:FILMPLOT. —Erik (talk • contrib) 16:16, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Whew! From over 3,400 words to under 1,400. It's a great start! I don't know if I can help too much... I tend to avoid plot summaries since they don't last long enough. You could ask at WT:FILM, though? Erik (talk | contribs) 01:03, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: The redirect Pride And Glory(film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 05:24, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pride And Glory(film)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:South Caucasian peoples

message: What is the purpose of this article?  Specifically, how are the "South Caucasian peoples" defined?
* The ethnic groups who speak (or spoke) languages of the South Caucasian family are listed in the South Caucasian languages article.
* The various ethnic groups who live in the country of Georgia are listed in the Georgia (country) article. 
* The sugroups of the broad Georgian national ethnic group are listed in Georgian people article.
Jorge Stolfi 22:06, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I think we should merge this article with Georgians. The article doesn't list anything that isn't listed at those ones. –BruTe Talk 18:13, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the definition?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rugby union/Fiji task force

message: I have been working on this article a lot lately. Was wondering if people could help. I've covered his background, XVs career, and up until the 2000s in his Sevens career. Anything since then (it can probably be looked up on the internet) I havn't yet added so would appreciate the help. A to do list can be found on the talk page. Thanks! - Shudda talk 09:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have nominated this article for Good Article status. It probably needs a copy-edit before it will pass. If anyone could look over it that would be great. Thanks. - Shudda talk 13:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Waisale Serevi]] 

message: Just a heads-up that I have proposed the article category relating to this project's articles for renaming -see (and join in) discussion at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_March_1#Category:Fiji_rugby_work_group Grutness...wha? 01:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categoiry rename
Talk:Ji (polearm)

message: Is it appropriate here to mention the Xiao Shou Ji (Twin shortstaffed halberds)? I know, short question, but. . . CaTigeReptile 12:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of Ji 

message: "Yueji" is a present-day created name, no historical document to provide it is be classified to ji.
To Qiushufang:
The Content farm webpage you add is not a reliable sources.So it should be remove. A ISBN number to mean that a exist publication.
About classification.If based on your inference,the iron horse or the seahorse will be classified as a horse ,and the bearcat will be classified as a cat.Obviously they are all wrong.A name is not equal to its classification.
The other present-day name of "Yueji" is "Qimao"(戚鉾,meaning axe-spear),and the appearance of Yueji is very similar to some Yue(鉞).Some translations use halberd to mean Fuyue(斧鉞). So Yueji should not be classified to ji now.
In addition,the definition of halberd is a kind of long shaft axe, so "axe-halberd" become "axe-long shaft axe", overlying double axe, the name is very inaccurate and absurd.
About "better source needed". Academic sources are not necessary. And academic sources are not "better" than other reliable sources (sometimes maybe worse).Furthermore, you use an incorrect name in reason section.So it should be remove.Ironbolt (talk) 18:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not simply say that it is not only a non-academic source, but I've also failed to find any other source which calls it a "spear". You seem to be bent on terminological pedantism. The object in question, whether you call it a qimao or yueji, is obviously considered and categorized as a ji now. A Google search of either qimao or fuyue turn up little to no results similar to the object in question. In comparison, yueji turns up the most relevant results pertaining to the object at hand. It is obvious that the item is most popularly known as a "yueji" today. Again, this is not an encyclopedia for ancient Chinese but modern people. If they cannot find the object called a "yueji" now, whether are they supposed to find it? Qiushufang (talk) 18:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  About some weapon classification
Talk:Dan Rowan

message: While the article is fairly tight … a film / television roles section would be nice … what is missing , is how / why / when , his last name changed from "David" to "Rowan" ? Adopted family name? Stage name? Granted , it's possible the answer isn't so readily found , but , it would add to this entry. 75.104.174.119 (talk) 16:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Change? 

message: The lede and the infobox both say 22 July, but the text says 13 July. Can we please sort this out and give one clear, consistent date? --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 22:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of birth

message: Can anyone provide more information on how Rowan was orphaned at age 11?  Such a major life event and no details.  Elsquared (talk) 05:19, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  orphaned
Talk:List of non-periodic comets

message: I've added Comet PANSTARRS to the list of Non-Periodic comets after 1910. STO12   —Preceding undated comment added 02:24, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Added another comet

message: Could you explain me what I did wrong, I Just modificate the table to include the predicted next perihelion and the Comet Lovejoy If I remove some valuable Information it was not my intention. (200.8.148.31 05:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation

message: In the first pararaph the text "They are usually on near-parabolic orbits that will not return to the vicinity of the Sun for thousands of years, if ever" confuses me a little. My understanding is that an elliptical orbit will always return, a hyperbolic orbit will never return, and a parabolic orbit is the special case at the transition between the two which will "just never return", and which in practice is impossibly unlikely to arise. Therefore, should this text read something like: "They are on hyperbolic orbits that will never return to the vicinity of the Sun"? The suggestion of the possibility of returning in thousands of years contradicts the fact that they are "non-periodic". Is the point being made that we cannot measure some of these orbits accurately enough to know? Whatever, this needs clarification. Matt 03:08, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Orbit
Category talk:English football referees

message: Warnock should be removed.  He is a club manager, not a referee.  In fact he has shown over the years one of the worst understandings of the laws and refereeing of anyone involved in the top levels of the sport. 207.112.57.104 03:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally agree. Unfortunately, the Category tag at the bottom of his article means he automatically gets added to this list, and no amount of persuasion will convince the Wikiresidents of Sheffield to keep it removed (I tried just the once!). Refsworldlee(chew-fat)(eds) 02:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Neil Warnock]]
Talk:New York Botanical Garden

message: The article has two pictures, but they're not great, and more would help illustrate the article.  Some which are more scenic and which illustrate plants and structures in the garden.  See also photo request for Lorillard Snuff Mill, a National Historic Landmark within the grounds.  Photos and/or photo uploads are needed.
*New photos would be helpful.
Whats admission... is it free?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.230.127.211 (talk) 04:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's free only one day a week.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.232.55.223 (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos needed 

message: Hi!  I added a section listing historic photographers and the section was deleted by someone not logged in.  I'm absolutely willing to discuss utility of this section, but as other important figures are listed earlier on in the page and as the person making the change isn't available to discuss this change, I'm reverting the page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emjackson42 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photographers 

message: Under the section "Grounds" it mentions the lab, conservatory, and library, but I really think the herbarium needs a specific section too (not just briefly in the preceding text). I would add this myself, but there's a conflict of interest 
--AKW-ward (talk) 19:22, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree! Same for me... COI... There is so much literature to look at:
* https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12228-016-9423-7
* https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=13441470698229445087&as_sdt=5,33&sciodt=0,33&hl=en
* https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02805288
* https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cites=16459299622191121441&as_sdt=5,33&sciodt=0,33&hl=en
Emjackson42 (talk) 21:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs mention of The William and Lynda Steere Herbarium 

message: There is no article on a journal that seems to be published by the NYBG namely of the New York Botanical Garden. Bronx, NY. This journal is not mentioned in this article either. A sceleton article is available in Spanish wikipedia . Dwergenpaartje (talk) 14:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden. Bronx, NY
Talk:Alain-Philippe Malagnac d'Argens de Villèle

message: The name is Villèle, not Villele (I think Villele in fact is unpronouncable for an original French tongue). Soczyczi (talk) 19:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Grave accent
Talk:C.A. Independiente de La Chorrera

message: Is it Club Atlético Independiente or Independiente F.C.? Fifaddicted (talk) 03:19, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I'm confused too. I requested a move. Discussion below. Davidsousa1 (talk) 23:13, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused with the name
Talk:Atlético Nacional (Panama)

message: I propose to merge Atlético Nacional (Panama) into S.D. Atlético Nacional. I think that the content of this article can easily be explained in the S.D. Atlético Nacional article page. Panama2005 (talk) 03:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 01:23, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Mukutmanipur

message: What does 'intimated' mean in terms of exploring the dam? Does one need to make a subtle suggestion to the overseers or perhaps sneak in? --SoylentBlue 03:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Private commercial tourism sites are not official sites. If such links are repeatedly added, they will be blacklisted. Wikipedia is not a travel blog or a means to promote your business. GermanJoe (talk) 12:15, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link spam 
Talk:White magic (disambiguation)

message: "White magic" should go to a disambiguation page rather than automatically to this article. I'm going to go ahead and do that. Bleedingcherub 03:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: White Magic is the opposite use of Black Magic. It is used for all good purpose reasons. Such as healing the sick, helping others etc. White Magic can not back fire on you, unlike Black Magic.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.206.232.237 (talk) 11:50, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  White Magic
Talk:Alvin High School

message: * Prior to 2006 Alvin High School was the only high school
* Manvel High School opened in 2006. This seems to be the HS boundaries from 2006
* Shadow Creek High School opened in 2015. This seems to be HS boundaries from 2015 on
* Iowa Colony High School opened in 2022. Here are the post-2022 boundaries WhisperToMe (talk) 15:20, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attendance boundary progression
Talk:Cuirassier

message: Doing a fair bit of reading. There must be some intermediary stage between 'knight' and 'cuirassier'. Thinking the German 'reiters' is that step.
67.177.46.253 (talk) 19:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: What you mean by 'knight' is 'man-at-arms', because in the period knight was a social rank, not a type of soldier. Really, no, if an armoured cavalryman leaves his heavy lance at home and takes two long pistols with him on campaign, he has instantly stopped being a man-at-arms and become a cuirassier. Urselius (talk) 14:36, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

message: As far as I can see, this entire paragraph is covered by text elsewhere in the Article- plus I don't knwo why armour is being called "harness" here, is that normal?
IceDragon64 (talk) 13:36, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the section is just a coverall for the image series. The image series itself is fairly useful, if not entirely accurate. Yes, 'harness' is an English noun which means, in essence, 'something worn, that relies on straps'. It is slightly archaic when applied to armour, but is still in use. "It will kill a man to serve in full harness", was written in a letter by an English soldier in the 17th century, specifically about wearing curassier armour. Urselius (talk) 14:25, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cuirassier harness evolution
Talk:The Boys in Company C

message: One thing I recall when this movie came out - and I just watched the trailer on YouTube and it's still evident today - is that folks didn't seem to know whether this was a drama or a comedy. For example, watching the trailer elements are very reminiscent of MASH, which the primarily a comedy as a film, albeit with serious overtones. I think a discussion of this might be worthwhile, especially in comparing the film with the similar Full Metal Jacket which, despite the dark humor of the famous drill sergeant scene, was never seen as a comedy. 70.72.211.35 (talk) 23:21, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Promotion