lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eugene Fama

message: I have merged b:Eugene Fama into Eugene_Fama#Bibliography; the edit history from en.wikibooks is here to comply with the GFDL. – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 00:38, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from en.wikibooks 

message: It seems like it might be better to start a separate article about the Fama-French three factor model instead of lumping it into a biographical article about Eugene Fama. Also, this section seems to require major rewrites both to address the above copyright concerns and because the model could be described more clearly and precisely in probably fewer words. For instance, we could define exactly how the risk factors are constructed. With the amount of interest in the model both from industry and academia, it seems that this would be a nice addition to Wikipedia. Any thoughts?
Wik-e-wik (talk) 08:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split the article? 

message: yeah, that sounds about right.
To acknowledge the truth is implicitly to acknowledge that his entire career has been spent promoting the effective pilfering of many by the few.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.202.140.109 (talk) 13:34, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Fama doesn't know what caused the financial crisis

message: this book has a lot of background info.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 11:41, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life and ancestry 
Talk:Coldsnap

message: My understanding is that Extended has nothing to do with the number of sets, it's just basically everything after IPA created specifically for MTGO. Am I wrong? Cyberodin
:This is more or less correct. Recently, Extended has been on a 'three-year rotation', meaning that the next rotation of Extended will ditch Invasion, Odyssey, and Onslaught to include all sets from Mirrodin forward. NorrYtt 19:46, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended 

message: I wonder of Braid of Fire ought to be mentioned here? This seems pretty unique to me, another neat demonstration of what Coldsnap is doing with upkeeps.
"1R (2), Enchantment
Cumulative upkeep-Add {R} to your mana pool."
--Dchudz 03:42, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I'm adding it to the list, which is pretty short, anyway. --David Youngberg 22:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Cards 

message: I would just like to ask on why half of the notable cards present on previous edits are now gone. And this case of removing notable cards hasn't appeared throughout the days of Ravnica block (that is the farthest I can remeber). Could someone explain on this? If no explanation present I would like to suggest putting them back, thanks. ~~ Wakipudeo ~~
: I deleted three (not half) of them because I regarded them as non-notable.  The whole section was kind of poorly written as well.  I removed Jokulmorder because "really big creature" isn't especially notable, and the fact that it was something of a throwback to the "let's print bigger and bigger creatures" isn't more notable than any of the other throwbacks.  Wall of Shards is just a cheap wall that gains opponents life.  It's kind of an interesting tradeoff, but no more interesting than most of the set.  Allosaurus Rider doesn't become notable because it was the prerelease card.  The rest of the cards do stuff that's either new and exciting or, in the case of Vanish Into Memory, the third ever player designed card.  Croctotheface 03:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, you're probably right about that.  I just came across this article and thought it needed some cleaning up. If I get a chance, I'll look over some of the others as well. Croctotheface 11:44, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of some Notable Cards 

message: I don't think most of the cards listed as "notable cards" are actually notable; Haakon isn't listed and several of them aren't really "notable" in that people don't pay much attention to them. Who came up with the list anyway? Titanium Dragon 08:50, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure who did initially, but I did a fair bit of trimming at some point.  On one hand, I agree with you, but on another, it's important not to equate "notable" with "sees play in Standard".  If you want to make changes, go ahead, but don't bloat the section too much, and don't just replace non-tier 1 cards with tier 1 cards. Croctotheface 15:40, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Cards? 

message: Only thing it needs to solidify C-class is the addition of  tags.  Cheers.  --lifebaka (talk - contribs) 00:12, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: C-class
Talk:Waratah, New South Wales

message: It would be interesting to get more information on the schools in Waratah.
Also, Waratah has an interesting history, having once been a town in its own right.
I have added a little. I will try to add more when I have the time. Christchurch 15:23, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I re-checked the ABS stats. What I edited into the article was the population of postcode 2298, which includes Waratah, Waratah West and Georgetown. Since the last two suburbs have their own Wikipedia page, the population of Waratah should be determined not by the postcode (as I thought it should) but by the ABS definition (Waratah, State Suburb, LOCATION CODE: SSC14476 STATE: NSW) which gives a population of 4287. --One Salient Oversight 06:44, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population of Waratah 
Talk:BS Zelda no Densetsu

message: Instead of the informal fan name "BS Zelda" I suggest that this article be moved to the fully translated title: BS The Legend of Zelda. Guermantes 14:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm...it's worth considering, although I think the current title is more commonly used. -Unknownwarrior33 18:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree with the move.  It would also be more in line with the other BS Zelda title. Sraan 04:05, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I realize this is too late for this particular debate, but that is terrible English grammar! Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 03:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: This isn't really a true remake. It's more of a third quest, much like Super Mario Bros. Special or Super Mario Bros.: The Lost Levels. Same goes for its sequel. I think it should be moved to another, more suiting category.
Actually, it isn't a remake. This game takes place between The Legend of Zelda and Zelda II as a "gaiden", just like how the other BS Zelda happens directly after A Link to the Past and occurs in the same world yet take place around Link's Awakening. The big clue? In Level 7 of BS Zelda (which is a condensed version of Level 9: Death Mountain in the original Zelda), the old man says that it used to be Ganon's hideout. So since it used to be Ganon's hideout, and it was Ganon's hideout in the original Zelda, then this takes places directly afterwards. (MAYBE it takes place after Zelda II had Link been killed and his blood was used to revive Ganon, but I doubt Nintendo would make a late split in the timeline. But it's possible, since I think the point of Zelda II was that Ganon can only be revived at that point if they sprinkled the blood of the one who overthrew him on his ashes. The parenthesis is all theory, though, I've already represented the facts.) 208.101.140.76 17:17, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remake? 

message: Wouldn't this game be the very first online game or were there others like it before? I've never heard of any games like this exept the 2 BS Zelda games. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.54.155.41 (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, once you get this far back, it becomes difficult to define "online game". If I remember correctly, Spacewar back in the sixties could be played over the ARPAnet on university mainframe computers. Interestingly, while ARPAnet was a predecessor of the internet, the Satellaview seems to go the opposite way, as, unless I'm mistaken, satellite internet is a rather recent development, and whether the BS-X counts retroactively is debatable. 153.42.168.136
Absolutely not.  I believe that honor would go to Colossal Cave Adventure, although, like the above poster stated, the first video game ever made could be played over a WAN, but this was first possible after CCA did it. 98.204.202.214 (talk) 23:47, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIRST ONLINE GAME EVER???
Talk:The Legend of Zelda: Mystical Seed of Courage

message: Wait, what IS this game?  I've been looking around and I've been finding a third GBC game called "Fruit of the Mysterious Tree."   But this is the third GBC game.  Did the name change? - Hbdragon88 06:07, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Read a bit more into it. It was part of a trilogy of GBC Zelda games, developed by Capcom/Flagship. Originally, it was to be called the Triforce Trilogy, with two of the games being remakes of the two NES Zeldas. Then, they decided to change it to the Fruits of the Mysterious Tree. This was one of them, but it got cancelled due to the complexity of the password system being used between three games. --BPM 02:23, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trilogy 

message: The Uura (?) are called Subrosians in the American games, and the alternate dimension (Subrosia) is the flip-side of Hyrule (as proven in OoS, when the Piratians' ship's stern was sticking out of the sand in one of Subrosia's beaches, and the bow was sticking out of the sand in Samasa Desert in Holodrum). Random the Scrambled 16:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't know where to put this, but...
Talk:Zelda: The Wand of Gamelon

message: This game must be undeniably bad to be listed as one of the worst video games of all time. Still saying so the way this article does without using sources and in the middle of exposition isn't neutral. Jaydubayubee 21:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: I find it interesting that the dress Zelda has on the box is nearly identical to the one she wears in Ocarina of Time, despite this coming out five years before OoT. Link on the boxart for Faces of Evil was taken directly from A Link to the Past's art, but this Zelda is not, as the Zelda in ALttP had a white/blue dress. --BPM (talk) 06:02, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zelda on the box... 

message: I see no reason for two separate headers as the text of either one is interchangeable. 68.229.184.37 (talk) 07:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge "Gameplay & Criticism" with "Reception"
Talk:John Laird (shipbuilder)

message: There is another John Laird (1887-1946), a philosopher (in the school of New British Realism and then later turned to metaphysical idealism) & author of The Idea of Value (1929), Knowledge, Belief, and Opinion (1930) & Theism and Cosmology (1942). Someone should help with a disambiguation and new article. Nagelfar 09:32, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done as requested, but I am no philosopherJMcC 11:28, 1 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 
Talk:Lado Enclave

message: The area of the Lado Enclave was 15000 miles squared, not 15000km squared.  Please don't make the same mistake as others and simply change mile to km.  If you can convert 15000 square miles to the km eqivalent, please feel free to do so. --Roisterer 09:07, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miles squared, not kilometres squared 

message: I have moved the following incomplete section from the article to here until someone can find the information to complete this section.
the Belgian incumbents were:
*15 January 1897 - 1898  Louis Chaltin  (b. 1857 - d. 1933) 
*1898 - January 1899  Hanolet (1st time) 
*January 1899 - 1900  Josué Henry  (d. 1948) 
*1 May 1900 - 1902    Louis Chaltin 
*March 1902 - 19..    Hanolet (2nd time) 
*19.. - 10 June 1910  ....
--Roisterer 19:28, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As you can see I added to and published the list (with some difficulty. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 14:25, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section from page moved here 

message: I'm having grave doubts about the coat of arms. The elephants seem to be copied from the Swaziland c.o.a. and the crown is just..... It's no Belgian heraldic crown anyway. The image is only on Wikipedia and not to be found elsewhere as far as I can see. Gerard von Hebel (talk) 07:01, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coat of arms
Talk:CXFS

message: afaik, cxfs is just a rebrand of quantum snfs.
Nope!
Cxfs is based on eXtended File System (XFS), a brand new 64 bits journaled file system developped by Silicon Graphics back in the 90's to help provide a secure (journaled) fast and reliable FS for it's Unix based OS - IRIX - running on their Workstations and later on the biggest CC-NUMA servers (up to 4096 CPU with a a single shared addressing space).
With CXFS, the FS structure itself remains quite the same but the metadata operations are centralized on a server (Metadata Server - MDS) to make sure there's no data coruption. 
CXFS has become heterogenous over time, with support for IRIX, SOLARIS, AIX, Windows, MAC OS, LInux 32/64, several platforms that have different Endianess and different POSIX compatibility levels.
Quantum Stornext, also knew as ADIC SNFS is different by nature, although some of the mechanisms are similar.
There's an old myth that one come from the other, due to the fact that the 2 initial founder of SNFS worked in the XFS team, but at the end of the day, there's has never been any proof of patent infrigment or any sort nor any case between them and SGI...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eeppe (talk • contribs) 18:44, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Space Rangers 2: Dominators

message: ClueBot et al, stop removing this information. This is an exceptional, and extremely damaging problem. It could render a computer largely unusable. I have never, in many years, encountered an installation problem remotely as serious. 98.210.209.79 (talk) 06:22, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It could also have been a personal problem. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 06:41, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

text: If you can verify that the game can damage the computer, then by all means add it. This would, however, require you to provide us with a reliable, third-party source which makes reference to it. If the problem you have experience is not documented in reliable sources, then we can't include it on Wikipedia (as we cannot verify its accuracy). ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 16:31, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Serious computer corruption
Talk:Fodor's

message: I did a bit of cleaning and rearranging, hopefully it looks good to everybody else. The "today" heading was removed because I didn't think the section was big enough or needed to stand on its own.  I wish there were more references/resources than the publishing sites themselves, but I couldn't find much on the internet.  Anyway, I removed the cleanup tag because things seem decent enough now. :) Foofy 10:10, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: PS: Fodors LLC is not a typo, it has no apostrophe for some reason, not sure why. Foofy 10:13, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaned up

message: The Fodor's article raises issues. What are the criteria behind the comment "first relatively professional producer"? John Murray's Red Guides, Karl Baedeker's Guides and Hachette's Guides Bleu were highly professional from their first appearances in the nineteenth century. The comment about Rome and Italians, out of context, tells us nothing about local people and culture but looks xenophobic.  I think the claim about being the largest publisher of travel information is contentious: broadcast and online providers could claim to be much bigger. Westwood43 (talk) 10:13, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article quality
Talk:Hermann Lotze

message: Would someone be willing to attempt a merge of this article with Rudolph Hermann Lotze? Nagelfar 10:11, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Rudolf Hermann Lotze already exists. There should of course be a merge, once the more correct name (f/ph) can be determined. Charles Matthews 13:06, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved Discussion page from [[Rudolph Hermann Lotze]]

message: A worthy section, without doubt, but one that was cut directly from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy article which is under COPYRIGHT (!!) [Copyright © 2005 by David Sullivan]. If you want to refer to the now-deleted list, just scroll down to "External links" and click on the "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" link; it’s there. If you would like to reintroduce the Selected secondary literature, please by all means, but do your own research.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimaingram (talk • contribs) 16:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: DELETED: Selected secondary literature.
Talk:Fatawa 'Alamgiri

message: This is really needed!
Well, I've made a start, but I would appreciate the efforts of othrs more cognizant of Islamic law than me. This important topic deserves a good article. --Nemonoman 16:25, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

message: This sentence was addded by user User:121.52.147.47: Can anyone verify? thanks. 
Fatawa-i-Alamgiri was compiled by Shah Abdur Rahim the father of Shah Wali Ullah at the behest of the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb.--nemonoman (talk) 13:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can anyone verify this? 

message: This article lists some arbitrarily chosen, very specific examples of laws in this text. This is problematic because:
* None of these laws are unique to this text nor is this the first text to explain them. 
* Some of these laws are partially quoted or misquoted.
* The cited original text is an edition published in 1980, it is unverifiable as the corresponding pages are different in the newer publications available on the web.
* The laws chosen to be emphasized seem to be those which are controversial to modern society. This feels like an underhanded attempt to criticize rather than an unbiased article on the text.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.255.5.100 (talk) 10:52, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Discussion" section needs revision 

message: The fatawa Alamgiri is a vast text. Selectively quoting certain parts out it make no sense and violates WP:UNDUE, unless it can be supported that these selective quotations are given weight in reliable secondary sources. Since this page is being linked from the main page, I'm hiding that text for now.VR talk 06:58, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: UNDUE
Talk:Emma Jung

message: I have marked this article disputed for accuracy. I was not part of the previous discussion; but I have read a couple of Jung biographies as well as his autobiography, and at least half of his books. I question the bald assertion that Jung married Emma for her money, and the suggestion that, as talented, scholarly and well-respected as he was, he needed that money. I have not read the single cited work by Deirdre Bair.
Also, the closing quote is not attributed to either Carl or Emma, and because it is indelicate, a direct reference to it would be highly appropriate. Twang 09:47, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If there was a "bald assertion" that Jung married Emma for her money, it's not there now. That Freud so chose to interpret the union and chose to predict its doom says more about Freud than Jung. This is also a pretty slim thread from which to dangle an "accuracy dispute". If no one stops by the talk page to show why there should be such a warning, I'll remove it in a few days. The closing quotation is Emma Jung's, from “On the Nature of Animus,” (1931), as published in Animus and Anima (1957).- Nunh-huh 07:22, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a month, and no one has given any reason here why the "accuracy dispute" should remain, so I'm removing it. - Nunh-huh 20:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ok, done. --Po Kadzieli (talk) 16:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scrutiny and appropriate re-edit 

message: From the article: 'A former patient of Jung's and later a psychoanalyst, Sabina Spielrein, claimed to have been Jung's lover, keeping a diary to document the relationship'
I am surprised by this wording -- 'claimed to have been Jung's lover', because this diary, can I look at it? Where? Can we quote from it this 'claim', in her words? Also, the term 'patient', well, one might quibble. What sort of treatment or fees paid are we supposing, here? How about 'none', I'm just saying. One may respond that she was an inpatient, but again, there is room for quibbling. An inpatient is perhaps not best described as '[A] former patient of Jung's'. It would be better if I provided sources, and we can treat my assertions with skepticism, but skepticism is my point. I have a doubt. There are fictionalized treatments of this stuff as an erotic sideshow, kitschy stuff. And also, note that I am not particularly exercised to defend Jung from charges of being a womanizer probably, I just tarry to quibble about what is in that 'diary'. DanLanglois (talk) 10:57, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jung's lover? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Giules02 (talk) 03:56, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Adult Development Fall 2023
Talk:Job analysis

message: I have recently made many changes to this article which I hope have improved overall quality. There are still things that need to be added/improved, but I have gotten started. I began by changing the introduction by rewording the definition and adding a little bit of background information. I also changed the heading name from "Methods" to "Procedures" because I felt that it was more fitting. I added a lot of information to the procedures section, and took some of the information from the systems section and relocated it to the procedures section because it made more sense. I have made sure to add more sources, and plan to add more eventually. One thing that I am concerned about is some information without sources. Before I began editing, one of the sources that a previous editor used was not specifically noted throughout the page. It is listed under the "additional source" section, but I am not sure what information belongs to that source. Hopefully, someone can help me out with this. Mnshumate (talk) 01:47, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Changes

message: I noticed that some of the new material is sprinkled with plain-text footnote numbers ([4]) instead of Wikipedia-style footnote numbers (). This needs fixing by someone who knows which source each reference is supposed to be referring to. The proper syntax for this is described at WP:NAMEDREFS. -- John of Reading (talk) 12:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference formatting

message: Job analysis make 2402:4000:B187:FE36:1:0:1145:1096 (talk) 10:33, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human resources Management
Talk:David Hackett Fischer

message: Merged from David Hackett Fisher ... spelling of the name was wrong on the other. I removed the book report on Historian's Fallacies - I wouldn't term this a major work. It's in the history of this page if it needs to be resurrected. Gary 10:50, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've removed the libel claim - if anything it belongs on the book page, not the author page. See also this Usenet discussion  for more details - there's some ambiguity remaining.  Gary 17:29, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Stockton 