lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of songs recorded by Pink Floyd

message: I think this list is good, but there is a few errors. The Echoes booklet and The Pink Floyd Encyclopedia states that it is Syd Barrett and Rick Wright who sings lead vocals on "Astronomy Domine" and it's David Gilmour and Roger Waters who sings lead vocals on "Another Brick in the Wall" (Part 2). The list of vocals on live renditions lacks some information, Roger Waters sang lead vocals on some occations on "Welcome to the machine". The problem of this list is that it has no references at all. Some of this info can be found in Vernon Fitch's "Pink Floyd Encyclopedia", but for somealbums you have to look other places. There is not detailed information in the CD booklets, except the Echoes compilation. Floyd(Norway) (talk) 02:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it' s David and Roger who sings Another Brick part II. If you listen carefully it's easy to hear the voice of both of them. And if you use PF Encylopedia, Fitch and Mahon's book about The Wall or Echoes booklet you'll find that Gilmour AND Waters sang lead vocals on this song. The same about Astronomy Domine (Except Fitch and Mahon's book which not cover Astronmy Domine). On most of the song it's Syd and Rick who sing harmonies to each other. Floyd(Norway) (talk) 02:30, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research?

message: I didn't see "Country Song" listed from the 1997 reissue.  Should that be added?  Joe Hoskinson  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.186.43.76 (talk) 14:42, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. I added it.Father McKenzie (talk) 18:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Zabriskie Point Additions

message: I was surprised to see that "What Shall We Do Now?" isn't on the list.  It is in the movie "Pink Floyd The Wall", and it was on several of their live albums.--Snowconeboy789 23:22, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Added.Father McKenzie (talk) 16:18, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Shall We Do Now? 

message: These songs were recorded for the unreleased album Household Objects, but they were released in the Inmersion Box Sets of The Dark Side of the Moon and Wish you were here respectively. Why aren't they on the list? Amb1997 (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Hard Way" and "Wine Glasses" 

message: Shouldn't we add the five new songs from The Later Years album? (Blues 1, Slippery Guitar, Rick's Theme, David's Blues, and Marooned Jam) ItsMichaelRay (talk) 04:29, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1994 studio recordings on The Later Years 

message: I noticed that some songs here are listed as not being released on any official albums, however they are on the 1971 compilation "Relics". can I edit them to say that they were released on relics?
Dvdmovies123 (talk) 17:31, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relics?
Talk:Cape Henry Collegiate School

message: Was CHC repurposed in 1971 as a segregation academy?  It seems like the right time frame, and I came across a tantalizing hint in a 1992 article from the Virginian-Pilot here where the Portsmouth School Superintendent Richard Trumble had cooked up some kind of private school choice program with then CHC headmaster Daniel Richardson.  They gave up on the program in the face of public opposition and lack of funding, and Trumble was quoted in the paper thus:
Trumble told the PTA Council that as "outsiders" from Northern states, he and Richardson underestimated the deep-seated resentment against private academies, many of which flourished when whites sought to flee newly integrated public schools. 
Was he speaking in general about the feeling of people from the school district about private schools, or is this a reference to something in the past of the CHC?  I'm working with a few newspaper articles to put in a paragraph or two about Richardson and this plan, but was wondering if anyone had sources that could explain the reason for refounding the school in 1971.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:52, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Segregation academy? 

message: Does anyone have information on the status of the Everett School in 1971 when it was bought by the Peregoffs?  If it was a functioning concern, why did they feel the need to buy it in order to meet the need for "an academically based private school"?  Wouldn't the Everett School already have been meeting this need?  If it wasn't functioning when the Peregoffs bought it, why does the school website make it seem like there's continuity between the institutions?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 03:50, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Everett school connection
Template talk:Pretenders to the Brazilian throne since 1889

message: Hum, there seems to be a mistake in this template: it implies the existence of more than one pretender at one time since the 1920s.  That is actually not so.  The validity of Prince Luiz of Alcântara's abdication (in order to marry without dynastic approval) was only questioned briefly, by Prince Pedro Gastão, under the claim that " there cannot be a valid abdication while the Brazilian throne remains unrestored".  Prince Gastão's claims were not met with any kind of substantial support, and he abandoned them not long after trying to bring forth the issue.Officially, the list of pretenders goes: 
*Emperor Pedro II (from the proclamation of the Republic until his death);
*Princess Isabel
*Prince Pedro of Alcântara, the Perfect Prince
*Prince Pedro Henrique of Orléans-Braganza
*Prince Luiz of Orléans-Braganza (present)
The list is like that because Prince Luiz of Alcântara abdicated while his mother, Princess Isabel, was still alive, and thus he was never a pretender to the throne (at the time, his mother was the pretender, and with the abdication, the "title" passed to his younger brother upon their mother's death).  Redux (talk) 02:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Who abdicated was not Luís de Alcântara (the one cognominated "Perfect Prince"), but Pedro of Alcântara, as you should know. --Tonyjeff (talk) 16:30, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Drunken shrimp

message: I believe they're not eaten alive--they should be dead before they're eaten. Badagnani (talk) 03:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Eaten alive?

message: Moin 92.107.22.237 (talk) 19:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moin
Talk:Submarine eruption

message: there's much overlap between the two. Fgnievinski (talk) 06:29, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree with a merger. The contents of this article should be merged into submarine volcano. Vsmith (talk) 13:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

text: Would you mind saying why you seem to oppose the merger? ,. Thanks. Fgnievinski (talk) 00:16, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I oppose a merger simply because not all submarine eruptions come from submarine volcanoes. Submarine eruptions can also occur when lava tubes empty into oceans from subaerial volcanoes, especially those forming islands. Volcanoguy 12:27, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thans for weighing in. Do you agree there's currently excessive overlap between the two articles? How about if Would Submarine eruption becomes a disambiguation page for Non-volcanic submarine eruption and Submarine volcanoes and their eruptions? Fgnievinski (talk) 13:01, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: What exactly is a "non-volcanic submarine eruption"? A quick Google search for "submarine eruption" indicates that the volcanic phenomenon is the WP:Primary topic. So moving the article title to create a disambiguation page would be unnecessary. What is the point of creating an article about submarine volcanoes and their eruptions? The submarine volcano article has lots of room for expansion. Volcanoguy 17:50, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You're not addressing the undesirable duplication between submarine volcano and submarine eruption. As you said, submarine eruptions not from submarine volcanoes is a secondary topic. These could be described in submarine eruptions so long as there's a hatnote stating . (BTW: subaerial volcano is missing). Fgnievinski (talk) 18:21, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

text: How common are underwater lava tubes eruptions from subaerial eruptions? Such exceptions could easily be covered with a note in a merged Submarine volcano article. Seems rather hair splitting stuff. And when a submarine volcano breaks the surface and a new island is born (sometimes only temporary) and continues with both submarine and subaerial eruptions... Vsmith (talk) 22:57, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge
Talk:The War Between the Classes

message: The section is too long.  No need to list every character, if someone who has read the book could trim it down to just the major characters, that would be great.  --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 02:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Character section

message: leave us alone please... this is a class project~ also we are still in progress of making this
:Wikipedia is not service designed to help make class projects it is a collaborative encyclopedia.  I have done a number of things to improve the page, not the least of which was moving it to the correct title. The War Between the Classes.  If you need any more help improving the article let me know, but removing clean up tags and reverting without comment wont fly. --Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 04:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not specifically designed to make class projects, but can sometimes be the subject or medium of a class project. Please see WP:SUP for more information and instructions for students. Userafw (talk) 08:52, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: vandalism

message: **Character analysis   
    
**stereotypings   
 
**story line   
**What the characters and I learned   
**The ending 
Userafw (talk) 12:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 
Talk:Buuz

message: "Buuz is an example of authentic Mongolian cuisine." The article does give a link to Baozi, evidently cognate with the word "buuz". Both are rather similar, only that the Mongolians seem to completely abstain from using any vegetables for preparing them. Now I won't argue that it is not "authentic" in the sense that you can get them anywhere (wish that'd be true for some tastier food as well), but it might be able to misinterpret this passage by suggesting that buuz hail from Mongolia. If such an interpretation held and if it wasn't argued that Mongolian buuz constitute a major departure from Chinese baozi, it might well be preferable to use a somewhat less assertive wording. G Purevdorj 17:51, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My impression is that baozi are more dough with a filling (cf. that statement about baozi being similar to mantou on that other page), while buuz is meat with some dough wrapped around it. I think the chinese version of buuz would be Jiaozi, not Baozi. Yaan (talk) 13:33, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I’ve just spoken to a Chinese friend, and he agrees with what you’ve said. He added (as he’d told me before) that in the Tang period, this kind of food was all subsumed under Mantou (with the Korean word Mandu (dumpling) bearing witness to it). Then, the Mongolians must have acquired baozi from the Chinese during the Ming or the early Manchu dynasty, the word jiaozi being possibly a new creation (not differentiated from baozi in the Wu dialect, for example). It would be tremendously interesting if anyone could elaborate on this matter. By the way, where to fit in Bansh? G Purevdorj 15:24, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If I understand the jiaozi article correctly, then jiaozi can come in both steamed and boiled (and even fried) variants. I guess the Chinese don't boil them in milk tea, but then Mongolians do not always either, for example when they make bansh soup. Yaan (talk) 18:10, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

text: btw. there is a user on german wikipedia who seems to have a knack for the history of chinese cooking, de:Benutzer:Reiner_Stoppok. Maybe you trigger his interest? Yaan (talk) 18:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Office of Intelligence and Analysis (Treasury Department)

message: Is the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) under this agency? If not, what is the relationship?Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 16:26, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, FinCEN is a separate bureau, but both are under the control of Undersecretary of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence Stuart Levey.  There's a little interaction between the two, but FinCEN seems more focused on domestic sorts of issues, while OIA seems more focused on international issues. -- Folic_Acid | talk  13:54, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know I hate it when someone takes my comments on the discussion page, since they may well be on the talk page because they aren't ready to be put into the article. Still, what you've just said is relevant. Do you think it belongs in the article? If so, do you want to edit it in, or would you like me to do it?Howard C. Berkowitz (talk) 15:49, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Relationship to FinCEN
Talk:Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence

message: The article/entry is NOT ACCURATE.
Writers/readers should consult official US DOE publications for accurate information.
ITTFNK (talk) 17:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The current article claims the OIC was created in 1977, but cites a source only saying the DoE itself was created in 1977, not this specific agency. Additionally, the cited source appears to detail proposals for what would become/could potentially replace the OIC, so it may originate from before the OIC's official creation. As far as I know, the only source claiming a 1977 foundation date for the OIC is the current article. 
This reference states the OIC was created (via the merger of pre-existing agencies) in 2006. It is supported by this one too, on page 23.
The article also claims the OIC does not currently carry out counterintelligence functions, although this may be from the various proposals in the current source. The current OIC website says the OIC "is responsible for all intelligence and counterintelligence activities throughout the DOE complex," so I believe this claim to be either outdated or incorrect. Additionally, the Office of the National Counterintelligence Executive cited as helping perform DoE counterintelligence functions has since been folded into the NCSC. Additionally, the NNSA (also cited in the current article as helping perform DoE counterintelligence) does not seem to claim any counterintelligence functions (to the best of my knowledge), so I believe the article should be edited to reflect that: 
1) As detailed in the first and second paragraphs, the OIC was not created in 1977, but instead in 2006.  
2) As detailed in the third paragraph, the OIC currently carries out all DoE complex (presumably DoE and contractors/affiliates) intelligence and counterintelligence functions.
These are some fairly substantial revisions for this rather small page, so I would like some input before making them.TransientBovine (talk) 18:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable Information
Talk:List of sources of Chinese culinary history

message: Badagnani, the English titles of each entry are what "other scholars" named such, not what I did. So if you want better English titles, please "find yourself". Chinese characters can be translated differently by readers, so I did not insert "my own translation". Moreover, I've asked you numerous times not to insert "hidden remarks" into articles. If you want to cooperate with me, would you raise your concern to the talk page instead, so that everyone can share your questions and solve them together.--Caspian blue 04:42, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Badagnani, I kindly asked you to refrain from doing things that I do not like. Moreover, I already explained that the hidden remarks regarding "in the mountains and" and the translation. Please desist the uncooperative behaviors. --Caspian blue 05:47, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The translation of book titles
Talk:Mock duck

message: I have never tried it yet, but how do producers achieve “distinctive [chicken?] flavor” without resorting to non-vegetarian ingredients?  The article should explain that.  Wikipeditor (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flavour 

message: Outside the context of Chinese cuisine, "mock duck" refers to a roulade made from tenderized round steak.  "Faux duck" typically refers to a tofu or wheat gluten dish.  (See: http://books.google.com/books?id=SrZMAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA4-PA27&lpg=RA4-PA27&dq=mock+duck+round+steak&source=bl&ots=j1lAYXg_eI&sig=WVrRBQ7jthTyijpual6Eoe88iRU&hl=en&ei=fOgZTcO4MIa0lQfLtsG6DA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CFEQ6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=mock%20duck%20round%20steak&f=false )  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.58.41.92 (talk) 13:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:Constitution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia

message: This article says "It [i.e. the Constitution as modified in 1974] became defunct in 1990, when Yugoslavia's successor states adopted their own constitutions."  The article on Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_People%27s_Republic_of_Yugoslavia) says "In 1992, the two remaining states still committed to a union, Serbia and Montenegro, formed the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, which was never recognized as the successor of the SFRY by the international community."  What was the status of the Constitution between 1990 and 1992?  Did it still govern 'the two remaining states' and if not, what did?  thanks.Richardson mcphillips1 (talk) 02:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Raven Rise

message: lol the cover was just released today! Can someone put it on this page. I have no idea how! 65.24.106.106 (talk) 02:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there may be copyright issues, and I don't know how to post things with their copyright licenses... Anyway, I think the cover looks pretty sick, I'm suprised it receieved mixed reception. --Alreajk (talk) 00:53, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: cover

message: We should include a list of the main characters, something like this:
[Bobby Pendragon]: The lead traveler who is supposedly trapped on Ibara.
[Mark Dimond]: Pendragon's best friend is confirmed to return from the excerpt on Machale's website.
[Courtney Chetwynde]: Bobby's other best friend, also slated to return.
[Nevva Winter]: Telleo, Nevva's newest disguise, will almost certainly return based on the end of the [Pilgrims of Rayne].
[Saint Dane]: The antagonist of the entire series will almost positively return.
[Alder]: will return; shown in the excerpt on the website.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.235.7 (talk) 03:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, but if you plan to add said list, only the characters who have been officially confirmend, not just guessed at should be in it. Teh Rote (talk) 18:17, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Characters 

message: The article mentions something about how Bobby looks much older, (possibly due to the artist change) but couldn't another possibility be that it is actually Patrick on the cover? This is just speculation - if I understand correctly - but wouldn't writing that it's Bobby also be speculation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.177.23.226 (talk) 03:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover Character 

message: I've got the book. Once I've finished reading it, I will do an overhaul of this page. Expect major changes by Monday. Rau's Speak Page 02:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Peter III of Moldavia

message: This talk page redirected from Petru II of Moldavia (until I fixed it), which talks about Petru I of Moldavia, as if he were the subject of the article. There's also a Petru I of Moldavia article! User:HopsonRoad 11:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Petru?
Talk:Dynamic binding (computer science)

message: The implementation of the derived class will be invoked instead of that of the super class.
Is it always this way around, or are there programming languages in existence that actually will call the method of the super class? --Abdull (talk) 16:40, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Please read Talk:Dynamic dispatch and help us describe the differences between dynamic binding and dynamic dispatch (if any exists). --Antonielly (talk) 09:46, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged and redirected, but please see Late binding. Sigh... 220.100.23.139 (talk) 23:36, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[dynamic dispatch]]? 

message: I've reverted three consecutive edits by 202.54.173.130 (all of those edits appear to be vandalism or self-reverts), namely this (stolen from here; the copyright isn't GFDL-friendly), this (stolen from here; copy-unfriendly), and 
this (stolen from here, completely irrelevant). ⇌Elektron 14:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism/copyvio by 202.54.173.130 

message: A disambiguation must be created. Dynamic binding has a meaning also in chemistry: see dynamic binding (chemistry). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.100.108.56 (talk)  
:Please do not move or rename a page by copying/pasting its content, as this does not preserve the edit history. See Help:Merging and moving pages. — Tobias Bergemann (talk) 14:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Urgent

message: The content of this page is wrong; the content discussing dynamic dispatch is actually discussing polymorphism in object-oriented programming.  True dynamic binding is implemented in languages that don't use vtables to choose the run-time function to be called, but rather determine the function being called based on the call site and contents at run-time.  
If there are no objections, I will update this content in the next few days.  Robert Paveza (talk) 05:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Content
Talk:Mel Odom (artist)

message: There is no  doubt  that  this artist is sufficiently  notable for an entry  in  the Wikpedia. However, more sources are required to prove this, and in particular, the flagged statements require reliable sources otherwise they  may  be removed at  any time by any editor who makes a further copyedit. --Kudpung (talk) 03:26, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 
Talk:Kimmie Weeks

message: "Kimmie Weeks grew up in Monrovia. In 1989, Kimmie's relatively normal life was shattered by the onset of the Liberian civil war which started in 1989 when he was nine years old."
How can he be nine years old in 1989 if he was born 6 December 1981?
Ehamberg (talk) 13:51, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: anyone from Liberia got the real story on this guy? i know "human rights activists" are never who they appear to be. specifically, i would like to know how this guy fulfills the imperialist agenda.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by F32423432 (talk • contribs) 11:13, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  real deal 
Talk:Bao

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Adumbrativus (talk) 08:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Bao →  – The WP:PTOPIC for "bao" is Baozi, the Chinese-originated filled bun which is more commonly referred to as "bao" anyway – the "zi" (子) is a common suffix for nouns in the Chinese language. The Baozi article also serves as a WP:CONCEPTDAB for subtopics such as Cha siu bao and Gua bao. "Bao" should redirect to Baozi (or, alternatively, Baozi moved to Bao). feminist🚰 (talk) 03:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 February 2024
Talk:Bryce McGain

message: Added reference and news about McGain's ruling out of India tour after shoulder Injury  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.95.202.141 (talk) 04:31, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruled out of India tour 