lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Oenothera curtiflora

message: HELP! I can't tell whether the accepted name here is Gaura parviflora, or Gaura mollis. 
I'll be doing more research on it as soon as possible. If anyone has any more information, please assist!
:Alright, well, it seems G. mollis is the more widely used name, so I'll use that. However, I'm not sure how to note that the name was changed; it seems worth mentioning. 
About the biological authority... in many of the sources, after G. mollis is the name James. I'm not sure who this refers to: there is no James on the List of botanists by author abbreviation, and I can't find reference to who this James actually is. If anyone sees this, help would be appreciated. AlexDitto 16:14, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion over accepted nomenclature
Talk:Simplicial homology

message: Added bulk to the stub. The aesthetics might need tampering with (the size of equations seems random)
: I agree -- I did some edits, hopefully it looks better now.  The dsplayed formulas (using math mode, and tex code) look more-or-less OK to me.  But using math mode for inline formulas has rather awful effects.  Best would be to void that altogether, whenever possible, I think. Turgidson 16:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early revisions 

message: IMO this section isn't directly relevant to simplicial homology.  It is not actually discussing implementations of simplicial homology itself as that's fairly straightforeward and has been done well-before the 1999 reference given.  This section is about computing homology of objects that you have partial information on, where one makes estimations on the topology.   In that regard it probably deserves its own article with links to various homology and topology articles.  I massaged the language to make it more on topic.  Rybu (talk) 21:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  numerical implementation section 

message: really? are there really n! simplexes with vertexes x_1, .., x_n? or maybe just 2, as I think!! http://planetmath.org/node/32828 tuples different by an even permutation should be identified!--2.236.204.53 (talk) 17:59, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "a simplex is a tuple" 

message: Ker∂≅ℤ⊕ℤ⊕ℤ, Im∂ ≅ ℤ⊕ℤ is not sufficient to show Ker∂/Im∂ ≅ ℤ - consider ℤ/2ℤ, 2ℤ ≅ ℤ. An isomorphism must be constructed carrying the boundary image to ℤ⊕ℤ⊕0 ≤ ℤ⊕ℤ⊕ℤ. Finishing the calculation properly requires some integer gaussian elimination, which I'm not sure Wikipedia even covers clearly right now. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 01:55, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Or perhaps after changing the article to use a specific, constructed isomorphism to ℤ⊕ℤ⊕ℤ, the phrase "x is an integer linear combination of y, z and can therefore be eliminated" can be used. ᛭ LokiClock (talk) 02:00, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad calculation of homology group 

message: In order to define some notion of homology, simplices must be oriented in some way. One way how to do it is to choose a global ordering of all vertices and then only consider ordered tuples of vertices with increasing order. Or we may choose an orientation of each simplex independently and identify [v_0,..., v_n] with sgn(\pi) [v_{\pi(0)},...,v_{\pi(n)}], such as in Prasolov. Another notion of simplicial homology is in Hatcher, where it is based on the more general Delta-complexes, but even there orientation is crucial.
Also, I miss in this article some kind of notion of induced maps. A simplicial map f: K\to L induces a map on
the simplicial homology but one has to be careful to define the induced chain map properly: each simplex [v_0,...,v_n]
that is mapped to a "degenerate simplex" -- that is, f(v_i)=f(v_j) for some i\neq j -- should be mapped to zero on the chain level.
It seems to me that the current version of this important article is very poor in general :( Franp9am (talk) 20:27, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definitions should be made more precise.
Talk:Triplatin tetranitrate

message: I've just corrected about a dozen typos in the History section. The text read well, with a professional sounding narrative tone, yet there were missing characters, spelling mistakes, a few accidentally exchanged characters, etc. This text was almost certainly copied manually from a piece of written literature, and thus may constitute copyright infringement without originating online. If anyone has access to suitable news or journals, perhaps some of this could be verified or paraphrased? Dan Pope 22:11, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah yes, the four should have been subscript. Apologies—I'll fix it ASAP. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 14:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Question Mark (aircraft)

message: Per the project checklist, meets all criteria for B Class.--User talk:Buckboard1 23:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Linquo coax ranis

message: :Ad logicam pergo que mortis non timet ergo.
:I now go to the logic that does not fear the works of death
Man, that's some tricky Latin. Of course timeo can take the dative (I confess I had never noticed that myself), so ergo could certainly be the Greek ergon. But is it possible it's also punning on the ergo of Logic? I.e. "the 'Therefore' of Death"?  --Iustinus 22:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's quite possible. I don't have any other opinions to draw on (or even a dictionary at hand), and was just having a stab at it. I think you are probably right. The reason, of course, for our difficulty as mere 21st century fellows is that he had to give internal rhyme to his hexameters, at the price of some obscurity ... Andrew Dalby 10:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I had a feeling you were doing this on your own. And yes, I noticed the combination of hexameters and internal rhyme. It's rather impressive, actually. --Iustinus 16:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, Justin, or at least you have a good scholar on your side. See William D. Paden, Jr., "De monachis rithmos facientibus: Hélinant de Froidmont, Bertran de Born, and the Cistercian General Chapter of 1199" in Speculum vol. 55 (1980) pp. 669-685 at p. 670. His translation matches yours, even to the quotes. Andrew Dalby 15:16, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I certainly am a genius when it comes to 6-years-gone conversations which I can scarcely remember ;) --Iustinus (talk) 16:03, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mortis Ergo
Talk:Marta Kauffman

message: "Dream On" for one... 199.214.24.145 21:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a weasel word - it's silly and unnecessary and doesn't belong in Wikipedia's voice as, you state above, it's simply your opinion. The Simpsons is a long-running show, is Friends even so described? JesseRafe (talk) 16:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  other Kauffman productions?
File talk:Pompeii-entrance-sign.jpg

message: Typical European attitude - "EU citizens only" get discounts.  They wouldn't be alive were it not for US soldiers in WW II.
:Well, the price reductions are mostly age-related ... but I agree, it does seem strange that EU kids and seniors get in free, but non-EU tourists always pay full price. However, it wouldn't have made any difference for me anyway ... -- ProveIt (talk) 14:30, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Mehergarh

message: The information in this article was a word for word copyvio of . Therefore, I removed it. I will try to make a stub out of the article. Thanks.  Mattisse 22:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

message: This article should be merged (i.e. redirected to) Mehrgarh, which is a much longer and more detailed article.  "Mehrgarh" is the more widely used spelling.  Fowler&fowler«Talk» 09:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Should be merged with [[Mehrgarh]]
Talk:James Bond Ultimate Edition DVD

message: This article seems a little choppy.  Perhaps a cleanup of the sentence structure is in order?
:Done. I tried to merge some sentences. Addict 2006 21:09, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy Editing

message: It should be noted that while the DVD's are fine, the packaging is absolutely awful.  The glue used on the packaging is incredibly weak, and the paper peels easily. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.89.245.68 (talk • contribs).
:It should not be noted because it's original research. ColdFusion650 12:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Packaging
Talk:Andrija Kačić Miošić

message: Kačić's were a Croatian tribe and a nobility, article about them should be written.
:Don't know the date of the comment, but there's Kačić noble family created in February 2015.--Crovata (talk) 04:05, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Park (Tunbridge Wells)

message: Removal of external link. I've readded my external link to disgusted.tw this is a site about tunbridge wells and contains many pictures and problems related to the Park Ward area (an area I live in) as well as other problems in Tunbridge Wells.
Robert O'Callaghan
:Wiki is not a collection of links to external sites. If you wish to add some of your own pictures or gain permission to add others pictures that would help. You could write about the area as you see it, good and bad points. Olive Oil  09:00, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:St. George's, Grenada

message: I just wanted to note that the University is not actually in St. George, despite its name, but I am not sure it should be outright removed from the article, but perhaps reworded somehow, as it is named for the city. Russeasby 13:05, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  St George University 

message: I've just removed, like, 35% of this article, since it was written like a tourist guide. We should focus on gathering relevant information, not promoting the city. There's no info on demographics, transportation, education, etc, and it's a relatively important place to have such a short and poor article. If I was more familiar with the subject, I would help, but since I'm not, all I can do is the basic maintenance. Victão Lopes I hear you... 02:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs attention 

message: The population listed on this page can not be correct.  The population of the entire parish (which includes the entire urban area of St. George's) was 37,000 as of 2001.  There is no way that the population of the St. George's settlement is 89,000. --Criticalthinker (talk) 03:22, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population
Talk:Livingston, Tennessee

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—75.130.122.87 (talk) 21:38, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, and they appear to be correct (roughly in the center of the incorporated area), as well as sourced. If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to provide a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 17:53, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Grasshopper chess

message: The diagram does not match the description...-moss ryder--71.97.162.13 19:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually the description refered to another diagram, which was commented out because of a strange reason. I put it back now. Andreas Kaufmann 19:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram
Talk:Dayton, Tennessee

message: I have proposed merging Crystal Springs Community into this article. Crystal Springs is in or near Dayton (probably on the side of Dayton toward Graysville, based on the street name of the bowling alley) and is said to consist of a bowling alley, golf driving range, and a somewhat mysterious Christian graduate school. The article is mostly non-encyclopedic, and I think it would be better placed as part of this article. --orlady 03:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing no interest in discussing the merger, I went ahead and merged the articles. The merged contents still seem nonencyclopedic (in part) and would benefit from source citations.--orlady 01:54, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Crystal Springs

message: I have removed June Griffin from Notable People, for the following reasons:
*Please read WP:BIO and  WP:NOT.  There is no existing article on this person, and Wikipedia is not a newspaper, a blog, a forum for free speech or any number of other things.
*WP:LIBEL You can't make personal allegations about a living person.
*WP:ATTACK and WP:BLP same rules apply.
Wikipedia is not social media, and if June Griffin is notable under Wikipedia policy, create an article on her. — Maile  (talk) 00:11, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  June Griffin removed from Notable People
Talk:Quantum tic-tac-toe

message: Need to add sample games or screen shots. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chalko (talk • contribs) 09:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need sample games 

message: I am new to Wikipedia, and my first impressions are that you folks don't take yourselves too seriously -- but then again, there is a month's worth of reading in the Policies and Guidelines and discussions thereof. So I am going to play conservatively and follow the advice on the COI page and, declare myself an interested party.  Then I am going to follow Robinh's advice and "Be Bold."  Then you folks can do whatever you want with what I write; as I understand things, once I post stuff here, it is not mine anymore.
I am an interested party because I am a longtime friend of the inventor of Quantum Tic Tac Toe.  He first showed me the game a couple of days after it came to him, in January 2000.  I have no financial interest in the game, just a personal one.  However, I am probably one of the most knowledgeable people you will find aside from the inventor.
Other sources of information: The rules seem to say that I cannot provide such, but I will risk telling you that there are a number of published papers by the inventor that use the game as an illustration of some facet of quantum mechanics, and that there is a web site devoted to the game.  You and Google can take it from there.
If it is acceptable to you folks for me to edit the article itself, let me know.  It would certainly be more convenient than restricting myself to the talk page.  Thank you.
(Two minutes later) ACK! OK, so how long does one stay logged in to Wikipedia, once one logs in?  The above declaration is by me, but the system logged me out during the period I was composing it and perusing the Conflict of Interest page (and its talk page).  Sorry, apologies, mea culpa. --Swwright 00:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Declaration of interest 

message: This was in 'The Rules'. I guess it should be here:
"(I'm new to Wikipedia. Before investing more effort in this page, is this going in the right direction? Comments and suggestions are solicited. If positive, I'll finish the page over the next few weeks. If negative, I'll try another approach. To whomever responds, thanks for your help.) AllanGoff (talk) 03:33, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Classic tic tac toe trivially ends in a draw, if both players play correctly. What about the quantum version? Is there a strategy that guarantees a win or a draw? --Mlewan (talk) 20:08, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it trivial? 

message: Sorry for my english, the 1st link is "404 not found", the 2nd seems to be bougth (commercial link), for the 3rd i don't know well iphone App but the page don't seem about the tic tac toe game.46.193.0.244 (talk) 00:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  All external links are bad
Talk:Rock Star Ate My Hamster

message: Why is the game 'distribution denied' on World of Spectrum ? Is this a Codemasters decision or Colin Jones'  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.60.25.5 (talk) 14:08, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Dunno. The Atari ST version's out there though. The graphics are better, the game's rock hard tho! 188.29.164.60 (talk) 21:25, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:SuperPower

message: i added a bunch to article and will add some more about the warfare and plotical system of the game later
--Kalus 18:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: added

message: If this is deleted, please redirect it to Superpower (disambiguation) 76.66.202.139 (talk) 05:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod
Talk:E-on Vue

message: I think this one should really be under something like Vue (software) as it was before, and I don't really like these kind of titles unless it's a product with very long articles. Now we're put in the situtation where most of the stuff here still applies to Vue 6 and the title is for a specific product under the Vue 5 line. -- Northgrove 22:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: May I propose moving this back to Vue (software) on the grounds that it does (and should) cover the full spectrum of Vue software,  and not one particular model? Any objections? └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 08:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea.  No objections. Ops101ex 18:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Seems like a good plan. Since this discussion seems to have died off, if no-one raises a good objection in the near future I'll move it unless someone beats me to it. Mark Grant 22:37, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hello, I'm new here, so please excuse me if my message looks all wacked out. Anyways I think that if we're talking about making it cover all of vue 6, then I suggest that a e-on software page be created in order to keep everything in order. That way you could list the general features of the product(s), and then edit then create different catagories to repreent the differences between each respective model. any questions, comments, ideas? Geekboy2000 (talk) 01:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: Please insert the new date for the 8th version!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.225.232.92 (talk) 13:20, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of the 8th version

message: Can someone change the "Stable Release Date" to:  "Someday, eventually"? --70.167.58.6 (talk) 15:09, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stable release date? 

message: Two of the references' links were dead. I've searched for working URL's and replaced them work the working ones. 
Being my first time editing Wikipedia, if I made a mistake, please let me know. -- Tekaso (talk) 14:58, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links 

message: I was on of the first user of Vue I still have the original 4 version Cd then up dated 5-6-7-8-10.5 stoped using the software 2015 204.48.77.219 (talk) 00:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vue 4 beginning
Talk:Conflict (video game)

message: *The AV-8B would've used a 25mm GAU-12 Equalizer.
*The T-80 would've used a 12.7mm NSV machine gun.
*The Su-27 would've used a 30 mm Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-301.
Jeremy Wasserberg (talk) 23:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies
Talk:Covington, Tennessee

message: Although well written and thorough, the most of the article is severely under-cited. As an example, the near entirety of the History section is written without citation and is wholly unverified. The article is being tagged with a  tag - which seems an obvious choice. Please add discussion here for disagreements or paths forwards on sourcing to verify the non-cited portions of the article. Tkasmai (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need for additional citations
Talk:Hartsville, Tennessee

message: The "large hill" rising above the downtown Hartsville area is called "Hilltop" or "Hill Top," but I can't find a name for it on any map.  The road leading to the top of the hill is called "Greentop Street."  If any editors know of or can find a name for this hill, please list it in the geography section.  Bms4880 (talk) 18:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Greentop
Talk:Erwin, Tennessee

message: The Erwin article is in need of the famous "Hanging Mary" photo that documents the Erwin hanging of a circus elephant --- check the dates; it is bound to be in the public domain.4.88.55.87 06:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

message: Since "city" and "town" are just different words for the same thing in Tennessee (there is zero significance to the difference in terms), the fact that the Census Bureau called it a city while Erwin called itself a town is irrelevant trivia. Also, the dates in the Census record are suspicious -- other dates in that record are demonstrably inaccurate, and other sources say Erwin was incorporated in 1903, not 1891. Accordingly, I removed the info about the Census error. --Orlady (talk) 04:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: City vs. Town
Template talk:Albanians

message: http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-42640/Albania
The origins of the Albanian people are not definitely known, but data drawn from history and from linguistic, archaeological, and anthropological studies have led to the conclusion that Albanians are the direct descendants of the ancient Illyrians and that the latter were natives of the lands they inhabited. Similarly, the Albanian language derives from the language of the Illyrians, the transition from Illyrian to Albanian apparently occurring between the 4th and 6th centuries AD. 
http://www.ce-review.org/99/18/vaknin18.html
There is very little dispute among serious (that is, non-Greek, non-Macedonian and non-Serb) scholars that the Albanians are an ancient people, the descendants of the Illyrians or, as a small minority insists, of the Thracians. The Albanian language is a rather newer development (less than 1500 years old) - but it can also be traced back either to Thracian or to Illyrian. In a region obsessed with history, real and (especially) invented, these 4000-year-old facts are of enormous and practical import. --Noah30 22:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illyrians
Talk:Spencer, Tennessee

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
The UTM coordinate should start with 16N...not 16S
—50.58.32.18 (talk) 14:04, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You perhaps think that the S in the UTM code that appears on this article's GeoHack page stands for "south". That is not the case; see :File:Utm-zones.jpg. The UTM code 16S 639400 3956607 for this location appears to be correct—a code beginning 16N would put Spencer in the Pacific Ocean to the west of Venezuela. Deor (talk) 14:57, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: An artisanal brand of chocolate is made in downtown Spencer after moving its headquarters there from the Bay Area.  This probably belongs in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.106.153.82 (talk) 02:51, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arete choc
Talk:Edenham

message: The ISBN given on the book jacket is 0 9511656 0 7. I don't think this measures up to modern practice but what it should be I am not able to guess. :-) (RJP 22:52, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked it on OLIS.  I believe the 1-6-2-1 format is no longer correct and that somebody trawls Wikipedia reformatting them with a macro.  The publisher is given as the Willoughby Memorial Trust.    Guy 18:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lord Willoughby's Railway
Talk:Nashville metropolitan area

message: I have modified the data for each county based off of the July 2018 data at census.gov, the most recent data. I have left the entire metro estimate alone for now, yet I still suspect that it is incorrect. I don't know if another county has been added to the metro area since the 2010 census or not. If so, that could be the explanation. However, a few of the 2018 county populations were inconsistent with the 2018 census estimates, and I have corrected them. Bneu2013 (talk) 04:32, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Population data
Talk:Cryptic (geology)

message: AMK152 proposed in edits of 27 December 2006 a geotimebox for this article as follows:
I feel that the box information that is appropriate for the article is already in the Hadean Infobox and the footer, and that other extraenous information, can be supplied where important, by links from the text.  I removed the geotimebox and left the Hadean Infobox and the footer, pending discussion.  --Bejnar 22:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:AMK152|AMK152's]] Geotimeboxes