lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Well car

message: This article has served as a proxy for double stack, but I felt the topic deserved it's own article, so I started Double-stack rail transport. it includes material from this and other articles. I haven't removed anything from this article, but others might want to review what belongs here. --agr (talk) 11:30, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double-stack rail transport 

message: Guide to Rail Cars is not spam at all. Just open it. Peter Horn User talk 01:41, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It clearly violates WP:COPYLINK, using content stolen from here, for example. It's obvious it is some kind of scraper site, filled with content lifted from any number of sources without permission. We have no idea who wrote the content, or who runs the site, so it's not a reliable source. Any website where you don't know the real name of the author is highly unlikely to be an acceptable external link. Violates WP:ELNO for any number of reasons and should probably be blacklisted. "Spam" is pretty good shorthand for all of the above. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 02:11, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Lifted, or stolen, from another site??? Then why this paragraph. "We wish to thank the Greenbrier Companies, Inc. for their contribution of general information about railcars, railcar specifications, and especially for their exceptional railcar illustrations for the samples provided." . Peter Horn User talk 22:21, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That entire line was also copy-pasted from Hinkelman's Dictionary of International Trade. Hinkelman thanked Greenbrier. Our anonymous blogger simply copied Hinkelman without even bothering to read what they were stealing. Classic fingerprints of a scraper site. Look at the other links the same IP added, like the one added to Honda Wave -- it's obviously copy of a newspaper article, stripped of copyright. The whole site consists of pidgin-English amateur blog posts (most like machine translations of copyrighted material) and stolen content.  --Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:42, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

text: I see your point. The Greenbrier Companies North American Rail,  well cars. Peter Horn User talk 00:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legitimate link 

message: Just you let you know that I inserted that wrong template in all aricles about N American freight rolling stock. Peter Horn User talk 10:59, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the right template 

message: For my comments about AAR Plate H see Talk:Loading gauge#AAR Plate H Peter Horn User talk 01:47, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  AAR Plate H 

message: Anyone interested may weigh in at Talk:Boxcar#Personal web sites Peter Horn User talk 18:00, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  An invitation to comment 

message: Can somebody please explain the mechanics of this statement? "In India double stacking of containers is done on flatcars under 7.45 m (24 ft 5
+1⁄4 in)-high catenary because the wider 5 ft 6 in (1,676 mm) gauge permits more height while keeping the centre of gravity still low." Casey (talk) 05:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing statement
Talk:Laura Theresa Alma-Tadema

message: What is the source for saying that one of Laura's sisters married Rowland Hill? This cannot be the famous Sir Rowland Hill who invented the postage stamp as he married a Caroline Pearson. There are many other people called Rowland Hill but he is the only one that can reasonably be referred to without qualification as he is much the best known. 
A genealogy of Laura's father, George Napoleon Epps, (https://www.ancestry.com/genealogy/records/george-napoleon-epps-24-8xk2m) shows five daughters: Ellen, Laura, Emily, Louise and Amy. But only Ellen and Laura are shown with a married name (Gosse and Alma Tadema).
A different genealogy (https://www.geni.com/people/George-Epps/6000000014531705126) doesn't list Louise or Amy at all  but also shows no married name for Emily.
The description of the Epps family group portrait shows Amy and implies that she married Chales Pratt, a wine merchant.
It then refers to 'Rowland Hill', married to Louisa,  and says of him "The full-length figure of Rowland was painted out - probably because of a financial scandal that caused him and his wife to flee to Argentina in 1871". This is amplified at https://www.sueyounghistories.com/2009-03-02-edwin-chadwick-rowland-hill-1795-1879/.
I shall therefore edit the main article to clarify that this was not the well known Rowland Hill.
BevRowe BevRowe (talk) 17:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laura Epps' sisters
Talk:Shibden Valley

message: Shouldn’t “valley” be capitalized? —Britannic124 (talk) 21:49, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I do believe you are right. Local government sources and the Shibden Valley Society do so. As it is in England it will be capitalised though:)--Charles (talk) 22:03, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Unity High School (Sudan)

message: Regarding merging the article for Gillian Gibbons into this one, I put out a proposal to rename her article to Sudan teddy bear controversy yesterday.  Being that the only reason Unity High School is known is because of this controversy, it may make sense to have the article be about the controversy rather than the school.  The most important thing right now is to I love you avoid fragmentation and duplication, which does appear to be happening between Gillian Gibbons and Unity High School (Sudan).  The end result should be to have one article and have the other two names mentioned here as redirects into it. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 12
:I've been around long enough I should really know to check the article history before opening my mouth.  OK, I see that the school article has been around FAR longer than the teacher article.  Based on that, I support the merge proposal.  I would still like to see Sudan teddy bear controversy setup as a I hate you to this article (actually, straight to the controvery section), but hte controvery should stay as part of the school article for now.  If this situation blows up bigger in the next few days then it will make sense to split it off to a separate article, but not before then. --StuffOfInterest (talk) 12:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It probably would, especially noting that the complaint came from another staff member at the school!. I still am unsure as to where the 'inciting hatred' charge came from though, as the only hatred being incited is by those who steamrollered the charges (and in particular that one), while under international media attention! (note - this is not just a random comment but actually an important point) Buckethed (talk) 21:39, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

text: There just isn't enough content yet to justify the split.  If this things continues to drag on it is very likely the article will need split, but for now it is better to keep it combined. --StuffOfInterest 17:48, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Funny, I was sickened to know that I live in a world that could possibly create such a "Sudan teddy bear controversy".  However, I'm all for the merge/rename. --Lode Runner 06:51, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Won't somebody PLEASE think of the real injured party in this sad affair? Won't somebody please help the real victim here? You're all thinking it! Won't somebody --- ANYBODY --- stick up for the poor Teddy Bear? 137.186.206.160 19:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I am assessing this article for WikiProject Schools and giving it Start / Mid class. Article currently seems to just focus on current events - needs more on the school itself such as the curriculum and campus, usually high schools are notable enough for their own article. Giving "Mid" importance based on long-term interest, for short-term it would be higher. Camaron1 | Chris (talk) 12:15, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Pensacola Christian Academy

message: Michaela Jacobs should be in the list, she won the NAM National American Miss Teen Pageant  Christ'sLight (talk) 06:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is stale, but for anyone reading this, I'm going to point out that notable alumni need to have their own article to be included. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 13:52, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Alumni  

message: === a accurate description of rules ===
1. No music allowed
2. No headphones allowed
3. No TV-Y7 or PG and up rated content allowed
4. No life allowed
5. No fun allowed
6. You will do 100 million work or else you will go to heck
7. You will be mentally tortured to the brim
Thx 4 asking 2600:1700:550:A700:9AA:FE5F:28D4:6E10 (talk) 21:52, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  rules 

message: 1. No music allowed
2. No headphones allowed
3. No TV-Y7 or PG and up rated content allowed
4. No life allowed
5. No fun allowed
6. You will do 100 million work or else you will go to heck
7. You will be mentally tortured to the brim
Thx 4 asking 2600:1700:550:A700:9AA:FE5F:28D4:6E10 (talk) 21:52, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  a accurate description of rules
Talk:ScienTOMogy/Archive 2

message: This seems like a real 15 minutes of fame thing to me.  Besides which, I don't think that a website making fun of the any other religion besides Scientology would get a WP article. Steve Dufour 18:02, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They might if the religion they were making fun of threatened legal action. Given the Scientology vs the Internet issue, this site appears to fit in there somewhere. Not for it's content, but because it got a notable response from the CoS. Anynobody 04:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Still it is only notable for one thing. I seem to be back on the project so I will propose it for deletion. Steve Dufour 04:35, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance tag 

message: On hold for just a second -- my only question is, what happened? It's clear that the site no longer exists (it's referred to in the past tense), but there's no explanation of what happened. There's the note that on October 13, 2005, he agreed to move the domain name, but it follows with a section on how he then decided to fight the case; there's nothing on what ensued! It just jumps to "aftermath," assuming it's already been resolved. Who won (I guess Scientology) and when did the site get moved or taken offline? And were there suits filed? I feel very much like I'm just missing something, or that perhaps a section was inadvertently deleted, so let me know if this is the case.
Also, one minor thing. There's two references to Passionofcruise.com. The first is in "Church of Scientology's response" and occurs only in passion, but the second, in "Aftermath", references Mel Gibson. My only point is that in neither case is it explicitly pointed out that it would be a parody of The Passion of the Christ, but the in its latter use, it assumes that the reader has grasped the connection (by mentioning Gibson without further explanation). I didn't want to interject many content changes into the article, but I definitely think it needs to be explicitly stated that Passionofcruise.com is a reference to the film. Dylan 00:29, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article nomination
Talk:List of Margate F.C. seasons

message: The vast majority of the refs are dead! I think some major work is required. Narom (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The site they point to has been redesigned, so the URLs just need updating, which can probably be done by a simple search and replace.  I'll add it to my To Do list........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:41, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Should now be sorted -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:56, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs 
Talk:Empire Nephrite (Fabergé egg)

message: Not sure how the title relates to the article - should it be changed?HeartofaDog (talk) 13:26, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've clarified it :) Gareth E Kegg (talk) 13:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: like the other egg articles. — MrDolomite • Talk 04:24, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs infobox

message: Von Habsburg has in fact publicly stated that he considers the egg to be a fake. Here for example in the section towards the end of this lecture which deals with the work claimed to be the 1902 egg: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cdxk1CG5WaY 2A01:CB14:C15:E100:4C9:3A3A:466B:82EE (talk) 17:53, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geza von Habsburg
Talk:Covariant return type

message: I think this is wrong: the overriding return type must be a sub-type of the original type, not any related type, or usually subtype. Always a subtype. That's why it is called covariant. Or am I mistaken? Jirka6 (talk) 13:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error 

message: This article shall be updated for consistency with this other article: Covariance and contravariance_(computer science)#Generic types
67.201.57.5 (talk) 21:49, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The facts have changed since the introduction of generics in C#.
Talk:List of University of Hull people

message: Should he be listed here? His own article lists Humberside College of Higher Education and not the Uni. Please comment, or else I'll remove it myself in a day or so (assuming I remember). Andy Dingley (talk) 16:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How do you know which article is correct as neither has a reference? May be we should have a reference first for which one is correct. Keith D (talk) 18:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's why I didn't do it immediately. talk:Paul Staines has a comment citing "the Grauniad article" as the source, but I can't find which one yet. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:04, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Observer regrets letter is a source he was at Humberside College of Higher Education - The Guardian article is not online (officially). Rwendland (talk) 19:12, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Paul Staines]] 

message: The following current entries either have no linked WP article, or a redlinked article. This doesn't indicate their non-notability (WP doesn't convey this), but it's a lack of indication that they are, and they should thus require some separate referencing. Comments below are my own:
* Frank Field, Labour politician
: Would seem notable, fairly well-known MP, surprised there isn't an article really
:: Fixed the link.
* Paul Field, journalist
* Gareth Hebbron, computer scientist
* Rosie Millard, journalist, broadcaster, celebrity debtor
: Daily Mail hack? Does debt make you notable, as that seems to be her only claim
* Kelvin David Tan, Prominent Singaporean advocate
* Lois Rogers, journalist
* Fai Tang, popular Professor of Physiology at the University of Hong Kong
: Added today
I haven't checked for correct linkage of the others. I'll add  to these. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:02, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious alumni
Talk:Holocaust teaching hoax

message: The "similar stories" section is complete OR, as no reliable source ties this controversy with those found in the section. I propose we remove it.Bless sins (talk) 07:21, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As non one responded, I'll assume there are no objections (per WP:CONSENSUS).Bless sins (talk) 01:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I also don't think this has anything to do at all with "Islam". Muslims never demanded the prohibition of teaching Holocaust, and they certainly didn't use Islam as a justification for removing Holocaust material from the classrooms.Bless sins (talk) 01:04, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The correct rendering of the word for anti-Jewish hate in English is "antisemitism".  In German it is "Antisemitismus".  There is no hyphen in it. My personal hypothesis for the (or a) source of the incorrect spellings is MS Word's auto-correct feature.
One more recent reference for the correct rendering:
https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism
The origin of the word goes back perhaps 100 years and was not spelled with hyphen.
In the article I have corrected one instance of the hyphenated spelling but left the other one as it is, because it is in quotation marks, implying it is quoting another source (where it may be spelled incorrectly). Dori1951 (talk) 12:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to write "antisemitism"
Talk:Penruddock uprising

message: The discrepancy in dates mentioned in the links to the Disbrowe letters is most likely due to the fact of their pre-dating the calendar revision of 1752. At the time of the uprising, new year's day fell on 25 March (Lady Day) so 22 March 1654 as mentioned in the letters is what we would think of as 22 March 1655. David Guest 21:28, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: @User:Svejk74 Is the source for the edit (Revision as of 12:30, 27 February 2014):
*
?-- PBS (talk) 21:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Other than the bits with specific citations I seem to remember much of it is in Ravenhill's 1875 book, i.e. for Rivers' petitions see Ravenhill, p.153 as well as the Thurloe papers, p.746Svejk74 (talk) 22:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems overly detailed for this article so I've simplified. Robinvp11 (talk) 18:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trials
Talk:Judiciary of Spain

message: In 2011 the outgoing Socialist government announced reforms which would save costs by transferring the investigative functions of the courts to the police and prosecution service, much like the Anglo-Saxon system. The new Justice minister Alberto Ruiz-Gallardón proposes wide ranging reforms to "depoliticize" the judiciary following the supreme court process against Baltasar Garzón, until these are published in the Boletín Oficial del Estado probably not much can be done? Timpo (talk) 18:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Impending Reform
Talk:Indie 2000

message: I am the person who intially created this page and I would like to state that it is far from complete. I will, however, not forget about it and endeavour to finish editing it soon. The reason for me not completing it now is it's too late and I want to go to sleep. Djskein79 (talk) 14:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A message to everybody who visits this page

message: Now, if it's orphaned, does consider it to be notable? Discuss Djskein79 (talk) 14:20, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned
Talk:Franklin Place

message: The first sections of this article would look better if the illustrations were balanced with text by staggering them left and right, associated with relevant text, rather than stacked along the right-hand side in a photo-strip, like an illustrated deli menu. Not all would agree this is necessary, but no one would actively prefer this layout, one would think. Anyone want to try it? --Wetman (talk) 19:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I for one have no objections to sensible layout rearrangements, and the one you made is quite sensible. Biruitorul (talk) 23:25, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Ossington station

message: I'm sure there's an entrance on Dellaware to this station.
jlam (talk) 14:42, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been edited to conform with a standard scheme for subsections proposed here: Talk:Toronto_subway_and_RT#Individual_Station_articles_-_a_standard_scheme_for_subsections -A.Roz (talk) 07:26, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reorganization
Talk:Monitor Elementary-High School

message: I've cleaned up some of the language of this article. I've removed the clean-up tag and the notability tag. While the sources on this are scarce, I would argue that histories such as those seen here are all but lost with the people who lived them. Monitor Elementary-High School may not be well-known, but perhaps it should be. I recognize fully that this article does not fit into the Wikipedia notability standards, but I would ask that administrators and editors consider the importance of little "h" history that is just as important as, but often trumped by, capital "H" History. --Folk smith (talk) 14:46, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bayreuth canon

message: This article was tagged when it was still under construction with the bullet list visibly in the process of creation. Information is more than a bare dictionary definition and no proposal of where it would be transwikied was in existence at the time in was CSD'd. --Peter cohen (talk) 14:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: removed CSD. Article expanded beyond a simple definition. Cheers  Gtstricky (talk) 15:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.--Peter cohen (talk) 15:17, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Should be update to include the 2009 performances.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.106.49.9 (talk) 11:46, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't notice this comment until now. The article has been updated, but I waited until the Bayreuth site which is the referenced source changed the statistics on their own page.--Peter cohen (talk) 17:04, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Is it possible to tone down the rather lurid colouring? --Kleinzach 03:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I chose ones that looked very different to someone with red-green (or brown-green) colour blindness. I also found it easier just to put in the names of major colours than try to pick ones from a chart when I don't know how they look to people with 3-colour vision. You can try proposing others and I can see whether they look different enough for me. Please be aware that this article is at FLC. Feel free to comment there.--Peter cohen (talk) 11:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Background colours

message: Hi, I'm an editor from Galician wiki, we have translated this article to Galician but I want more information about a book used at references. The book "John, Nicholas (Series Editor) (1983a) English National Opera/The Royal Opera Guide Opera Guide 19, The Mastersingers of Nuremberg/Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg, Londres, John Calder", the reference shows that Nicholas John was the Series Editor, but what was the role of John Calder? I can't find the book in Google, could somebody help? Thanks in advance, Elisardojm (talk) 12:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: More info about book in references
Talk:Cruising Down the River

message: The spelling "Lou Praeger" seems widespread on the Internet and appears on a couple of reissued recordings, but original record sleeves and sheet music all use the spelling "Lou Preager".
See for example:
* The French Can-Can Polka (sheet music)
*How Lucky You Are(78rpm disc)
*Dance Dance Dance (45rpm)
Igenlode (talk) 23:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the spelling I remember. Rothorpe (talk) 23:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lou Preager - spelling
Talk:Traveller (novel)

message: Well, the Zeki has landed, and I'm going to working on this article as I finish up the book. I have most of the cast through the first 3/4's listed. Is it worth noting in the entry that the entire book, being narrated by the character, is written in his very strong 'Southern dialect?' Imagine Hagrid's dialogue, only Southern. And lasting the entire novel.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zekiw (talk • contribs) 02:34, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Wolf eel

message: Just watched this tv film/program called "Deep Sea"
were they showed a Wolf Eel just grabbed,crushed and ate an Sea urchin wtf.
How are they able to eat them without dying  from all those spines?!
anyway, i'll look around on the web for more info about this later.
--Byzantios (talk) 15:51, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

message: The picture attached to the wolf-eel article is a Bering Wolf Fish, I believe.  Definately NOT a wolf-eel.
--66.223.153.2 (talk) 20:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks very similar to the picture used for the Bering Wolf Fish taxobox, but, apparently they're different.--Mr Fink (talk) 23:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong species pictured in Wolfeel image