Talk:Volition (company)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 14:32, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hey, just wanted to say, wouldn't we need to change the full legal name of the company? Since they were bought out by Koch Media, their name has changed from Volition, Inc. to Deep Silver Volition, LLC. as stated on their official website. Would we not need to change this in the article? --94.170.227.166 (talk) 16:23, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably not, they'll probably continue to release games as Volition, Inc., and besides, the Ubisoft article isn't named Ubisoft Inc., the Coca-Cola Company article The Coca-Cola Company Ltd. etc. despite those being the full legal names. This is only named as Volition, Inc. as that's what they release games as, rather than just Volition. 83.100.233.169 (talk) 10:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I know that but like shouldn't be at least mention it at the start of the article such as Deep Silver Volition, LLC. dba Volition Inc. etc. I dunno. --94.170.227.166 (talk) 15:53, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Volition, Inc. vs. Deep Silver Volition, LLC.? 

message: i'd like to propose we move this back to "Volition, Inc.".
* Volition will still be releasing games under the "Volition, Inc." moniker
* Once moved back, the "(video game studio)" portion of the title will become quite unnecessary as there are no other Volition, Inc.s that it can be confused with
- 83.100.233.169 (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a good compromise would be to have the Article name itself as "Volition, Inc." but have the top of the infobox and the start of the article as "Deep Silver Volition LLC." Maybe explain the name change somewhere in the article? --94.170.227.166 (talk) 02:20, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

text: Agreed. Unless someone disagrees, can someone do this please? - 83.100.233.169 (talk) 06:10, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  move back to Volition, Inc. 

message: Hey , my point was that the red triangle pointed downward meaning a decrease of the number of employees says nothing without knowing what the number of employees was before. Maybe it's the mobile view, but I don't see any way of knowing what the previous number is. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 16:14, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, no it's not a rendering issue, there is no previous number present, because we don't know or might not know how many people they formerly employed. However, the sources used to gain the number talk about layoffs, hence we can verifiably say that they were less than before. Hope this helps. Lordtobi (✉) 17:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Employees