lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Two-tier system

message: You do not seem to have expressed a neutral attitude on your other edits in wikipedia
I have been noticing your political edits all over Occupation of Iraq article – These edits do not seem in any way to contribute towards the knowledge on the subject in a neutral many but seem to be deliberate avts of vandalism in support  in support of US policy  in Iraq.  
For instance you remove all references to US soldiers committing atrocities in Iraq and Civilian deaths. You have removed all references that the war was illegal even though the UN declared the war illegal – We only quoted from the UN Gen assembly - you have even removed the words of the UN secretary Gen on Iraq.... You have removed references from a dozen newspapers that report on the occupation of Iraq as that puts the US in a poor light. 
The newspaper you work for The News & Observer is a rabidly pro American occupation of Iraq mouthpiece undistinguishble from its content from  Fox News – But let me remind you this is Wikipedia not some silly Southern Rag.
OK! OK!!! You are a American and JUST love your country GOD Bless America and all that..- If you love your country so much re join the marines or something and toddle off somewhere in the world to find some people to fire on.
But you know the rest of the world has a point of view as well along with many Iraqi people who visit this page which now shows signs of your grubby deletions in favour of your country all over it.
Goodall
:I find the above to be abominable, and while I don't know Maureen, I find her rather likable after reading such a dispicable attack. Vote Sam Spade for Arbiter! 17:40, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  anon doesn't think we should take Maureen's ideas seriously
Talk:Colmar Freiherr von der Goltz

message: As it stands, our article is unaware that Goltz had a career after 1908, which he most assuredly did. For that reason, among others, I've created a 1911 warning tag and slapped it on the front. Mackensen (talk) 02:55, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: Some regard his writings as a foreshadowing of wars of extermination and a military justification of them; this actually needs to be be addressed either confirming or denying these tendencies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.12.203.112 (talk) 07:46, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on his writings and ideas concerning war 

message: There seems to be a over-reliance on this source; Akmeșe, Handan Nezir The Birth of Modern Turkey The Ottoman Military and the March to World I, London: I.B. Tauris 
In particular, the implications that Goltz was a 'militarist' and 'social-darwinist' are unfounded in any primary sources of Goltz himself; the opinion of a single historian in a single work in which Goltz is not the main focus. The quotes of Goltz given in evidence of being a militarist or social-darwinist (terms which of course have a 'negative' implication, as well as being vague and polemical in nature) are themselves not out of keeping with standard 'realist' notions of the impossibility of eternal peace etc etc. The notion that wars would become 'total' and about mass mobilization is not by itself a normative desire for such; Goltz in his 'The Nation in Arms' notes that nationalism itself had ended the age of conquest - Germany had not even considered annexing swathes of France in 1871.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.1.100.63 (talk) 15:23, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over-reliance on a single source, and perojative undertones...
Talk:Mighty Beanz

message: It had the sense of being padded with the same limited information.
The grammar, sentence construction, and repetitiveness required rephrasing, organization, and proofreading.
I wasn't going to do that, given the somewhat dated subject of the article. But ClueBot reverted my simple changes, so
I figured a greater change would require human verification before a summary revert. Dfoofnik (talk) 05:05, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrote the lead paragraph and others (still a bit redundant)
Talk:List of exponential topics

message: This page is now redirected to by the Exponents page, which had previously been redirecting to The Exponents. (See this talk page  Accordingly, I've also added The Exponents to this list, despite their dubious association with actual exponents.  This solution seems imperfect to me, but I can't think of a better one.  Alex Dodge 18:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Exponents" redirect
Talk:Degaussing

message: Another use case for degaussing which I cannot see in the article is the act of reducing remnant magnetic fields from the playback and record heads of tape recorders as these fields can increase the noise floor during recording and playback. I can type out a short paragraph detailing the procedure. Gutten på Hemsen (talk) 21:30, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose it goes in the article, but "detailing the procedure" sounds like WP:NOTHOWTO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gah4 (talk • contribs) 06:00, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You’re absolutely right. That was an inaccurate phrasing. The paragraph describes only the motivation behind tape recorder degaussing and why it can be needed. Gutten på Hemsen (talk) 11:21, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tape recorder heads 

message: Is there a case for splitting marine applications into a new article? The physics is the same but the processes are very different.--AntientNestor (talk) 07:14, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spin off marine applications?
Talk:Ain't It Dead Yet?

message: Which band/s? This page seems very stubby...
I'd have to check my ticket stub from the show but I'm quite sure that it was Edward Ka-spel (he of Legendary Pink Dots fame) who played the opening slot. There were no other opening acts on the bill. Speaking frankly, I'm not sure that this entry has any reason to grow beyond a stub. Frozenwasteland24 (talk) 00:17, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Pokémon: Destiny Deoxys

message: Because User:Tregoweth's rv let a spelling error back in (as noted in my last edit), I had to rv it back to its previous form. --Ryanasaurus0077 13:45, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: A Note
Talk:Johanna Fateman

message: Hmmm hi... A couple questions for anyone:
#The article reads "...when she handed her a zine." The pronouns here are ambiguous. Who handed who (whom?) a zine?
#In the same phrase, how is the word zine used? The page it links to talks about small distribution magazines. Is this how the word was intended here?
:-Rholton 03:18, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: , 1) Fateman handed Hannah a zine. I don't see how it could be interpreted differently 2) yes Vexations (talk) 17:20, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:
* Cite templates will be used where possible.
* I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
* Links (either direct or indirect) to potentially unreliable or incomplete digitised copies and to booksellers may be removed. 
This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 05:46, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Toy Story

message: There is a belief in Brazil that it was the 1996 film Cassiopéia that was the first computer-animated film. Is it notable enough to be in the Toy Story article? SuperFeral (talk) 14:20, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cassiopéia belief in Brazil? 
Talk:Fangirl

message: This seems to be more of a divide between the fanfic writers and the canon freaks, which aren't always divided on strict gender lines ^_^
I just stumbled on this page and found it quite difficult to understand -- it seems to be written for the sake of people already in the subculture.  For instance, I don't really see what connection, if any, there is between the sentences in the second paragraph.  It reads like an argument is being made, but there's so much jargon and assumed understanding, that I was unable to follow it -- are fangirls distinct from fanboys for reasons other than gender?  What does male misogyny have to do with it?
Also, that paragraph seems to deal entirely with anime, and uses anime terms quite liberally (and assumes the reader knows what they mean), but the rest of the article doesn't seem to relate specifically to anime.
Also, after reading this, I still don't understand the role of "Big Name Fans".
--Misterwindupbird 03:12, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  This needs to be written for a mainstream audience, not slash/anime/gamer nerds.  And even if it were -- is this really encyclopedic?  I mean, really.  Neurophyre 02:38, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: We need to close the "edit" option on this page, there are too many flamers vandalizing it and putting sarcastic and pseudo-humoristic comments. Purple Rose 07:48, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ask for article protection 

message: I think this article is too weak to stand on its own. I think it would be better suited to being a subsection of either Otaku, Japanophile, or Fan (aficionado). Thoughts? --nihon 05:49, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has been merged with Fan (aficionado) in order to make one more robust article instead of two weak ones. --17:48, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Otaku, Japanophile, or Fan (aficionado)?

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 20:33, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008-03-27 Automated pywikipediabot message
Talk:Fort Koshkonong

message: Moved from the article:
More can be learned about Fort Koshkonong, General Atkinson, Chief Blackhawk, and this area through the Hoard Historical Museum located at the intersection of Hwy 12 and South 4th Street East (the specific address is   Hoard Historical Museum,407 Merchants Ave, Fort Atkinson, WI 920-563-7769)
I don't think we need this in the article itself, but it might be useful to someone looking to improve articles about southern Wisconsin. CyborgTosser (Only half the battle) 03:45, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Digital signal processor

message: In 1999, Improv Systems introduced the Jazz DSP, the worlds first fully configurable VLIW DSP architecture targeting the embedded DSP market. Being a VLIW processor, the Jazz DSP provides high performance through parallel execution of operations.--R.Koot 20:41, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible POV (removed from article page) 

message: I think this "circular logic" definition needs to be re-written:
"A digital signal processor (DSP) is a specialized microprocessor designed specifically for digital signal processing, generally in real-time computing." This is akin to "A lock is a specialized mechanical device designed specifcially for locking..."
Suggest something like this:
A digital signal processor (DSP) is a specialized microprocessor designed specifically for altering electrical signals using digital algortihms, generally in real-time computing.
12.38.109.180 20:54, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular Logic 

message: I was confused by this strange word. I suspect it is a typo, but in the rest of this paragraph, the term "looping hardware" is being repeated several times. --Lazer erazer 18:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Special loopjkking hardware 

message: I rewrote the Modern DSP section to remove blatant advertising and give an impartial point of view. Removed the advert tag to reflect this edit. --mulletsrokkify 17:22, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrote section to remove blatant advertising

message: AFAIK the first DSP (recognized as such by the IEEE here: http://www.ieeeghn.org/wiki/index.php/Milestones:Speak_%26_Spell,_the_First_Use_of_a_Digital_Signal_Processing_IC_for_Speech_Generation,_1978) was the TMC0280 used in the Speak and Spell.  It's actually present in other Wikipedia articles, so it should probably be placed here, unless the fact that it isn't programmable is why it isn't listed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.25.48.69 (talk) 01:53, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TI's contribution 

message: Edit on 01:35, 2017 June 4 seems to have added material from this book Nukeqler (talk) 17:51, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyrighted material 

message: It'd good to explain the difference in the article. Setenzatsu.2 (talk) 01:13, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  v sound chip(processor)
Talk:Viatical settlement

message: I've removed the paragraph in the lead that likened a viatical settlement to a zero-coupon bond.  Not only was this paragraph unrelated to anything in the body of the article, it was also of dubious merit (it's a bit of a stretch to categorize a life-insurance policy as a "bond").  Also, the referenced source was a blog run by a company that engages in the viatical business.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of investment analogy 

message: Today, viatical settlement is an archaic phrase. Everyone uses life settlement — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhickey94 (talk • contribs) 16:45, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This needs to be consolidated to life settlements 

message: ￼i win the lottery 39.41.227.4 (talk) 21:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I win the lottery 

message: I win a lottery money shiffted in my bank account 39.41.227.4 (talk) 21:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I win a a lottery money shifted in bank account
Talk:Tourist guy

message: Could someone upload the pictures alluded to?Mydotnet 04:57, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/blphoto-wtc-g6.htm has some.
Where is the the Wave ??
This should be deleted, this is not encyclopedia dramatica. 76.6.95.0 (talk) 06:26, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This guy kinda reminds me of the "Kilroy Was Here" joke, where the graffiti ended up all over the world.  The humor's based on the obsurdity of places in which the graffiti/tourist is found. ElijahD 21:20, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the movie "The Thrill Seekers" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrill_Seekers_(film)) features a guy who shows up at various disasters. I think there are more similar items. It would be nice to put all these together in a section of this article, or maybe even their own article... but what to call it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Friendly person (talk • contribs) 01:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference to Kilroy Was Here

message: Since this is an article about the photo it would be nice to show it, A before and after type thing so the doctoring effect would work. Benjiboi 00:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos would be helpful

message: I'd say this one is a notable Web 1.0 meme, and does have reliable sources.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 15:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Browsing category of Internet memes

message: http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/0/6/6/0131660.jpg
Should this be mentioned in the article?
:If you can find a reliable source; I wasn't able to. Supernerd11  Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 17:04, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original airplane picture... 

message: Without getting into the notability debate (see prev AfDs) this could use better inline sources, is the KKK picture notable or in any way more than some random person's photoshop job? And is there a better name for this article than 'Tourist guy' ? ― Padenton|✉   20:32, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I will get rid of the KKK image. 118.93.85.100 (talk) 23:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  New cleanup tag 

message: It is truly amazing that such superficial, niche topics like this are important enough to be given a Wikipedia article, but articles on the Mexico City Congressional Attack and the George Washington Bridge Bomb Plot, both of which nearly killed hundreds of people, and both which have articles on historycommons.org, are absent due to a "lack of notability." 2600:1012:B12E:8BCC:68E4:8362:93AF:70EB (talk) 22:34, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It was something which was extremely well-known for a relatively brief period, like Hampster Dance, Mahir Cagri, etc. etc.  Wikipedia is not currently constrained by disk space. AnonMoos (talk) 03:11, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance of Article
Talk:Fallujah/Archive 1

message: WARNING: Much of this article discussion is not editorial in nature but is a debate over the appropriateness of military operations in Fallujah. The Fallujah article has significantly improved in the last week (Nov 15 2004), but was at one time riddled with randomly pasted content on both sides of the issue. 52 Kb of discussion remains below, and includes much outcry over the Fallujah offensive and some suspicion regarding the NPOV foundations of Wikipedia.  Not sure what to do with it all, but at least the article is looking better. Somebody may want to archive this discussion, but I don't know how to do it. User:MPS
:OK, I can do that. :) Maurreen 06:10, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning

message: Are these three users all sock puppets? Check their editing records... or perhaps the black helicopter brigade has mobilised en masse and wound up here? -- ChrisO 23:07, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that was TruthSayer, but yes, the history and writing style should make it obvious that they are the same person. And I might add that the style and tactics remind me somewhat of User:Bird. --Michael Snow 23:23, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds about right. Perhaps someone can do a fun log check. - Fennec 00:34, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I rather liked the way that at one point they started talking to one another. -- The Anome 07:22, 30 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: JillP, SaltyDog, TruthSeeker - all sock puppets?

message: Well, the assault has started. Should we do some heavy newslike coverage now, or?
:Only major events in the assault need be covered I'd think.  Actually, I was hoping to move the Seige to a new page, seeing as how it's taking up so much of the article. Oberiko 14:16, 10 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assault
Talk:Tammy Faye Messner

message: For more gender equality, as she is independently notable, should not "Tammy Faye" be referred to as Bakker or Messner (as appropriate), v. "Tammy" when her spouses are cited as Bakker and Messner ? rkmlai (talk) 20:11, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  as in legal documents ... 

message: Is available on Hulu (http://www.hulu.com/watch/232459/the-eyes-of-tammy-faye). Should this be included in the main article? 98.199.232.32 (talk) 09:31, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Eyes of Tammy Faye 

message: This article is missing valuable content that was here years ago.  It has shrunk, and specific content has been removed.  We need someone to go in here and do the sufficient research, and compile a comprehensive bio on her life and who she was.  This article looks like a mess to me right now.  I don't know what happened here.  Adrade (talk) 17:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who hijacked this article? 

message: There is a good deal of material on this page without sources - ironically, the entire section on PTL, on which Mrs. Messner became famous. Although she is dead, I suggest the article should still be written similar to BLP, with the care taken with biographies of living persons. There must be some reliable sources for the PTL section. Otherwise, the section should be trimmed or - unfortunately - deleted.Purplethree (talk) 16:38, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: Figured it was appropriate considering it's currently parked at a domain squatter page. VeroniqueBellamy (talk) 07:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed the links to tammyfaye.com
Talk:Osteoarthritis

message: Is still first line with NSAIDs second line when it comes to analgesics. Have restored this to the summary of the management. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Acetaminophen

message: I was very surprised to see a section on alternative medicine, which is an oxymoron in itself, particularly considering Wikipedia guidance on using only verified sources and information. I.e. what do you call an alternative medicine which works? A medicine!!! A better title would be Unverified Treatments. I am not an expert on Osteoarthritis, so I will leave it to others with more knowledge to edit. Lkingscott (talk) 10:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good suggestion and done. Zefr (talk) 17:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative medicine
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive (citing references)

message: style ain't really my thing - but just checked this page for the "correct" style for adding a scientific reference... eg Lancet 2004;363:1747,1757-1763. is there such a style recomendation? if so it should really be on this page shouldn't it? (i could link to the online version but you need to pay - so seems a bit pointless) Erich 03:04, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it seems like that hsould be here. I think we should make the references as complete as possible (including article names) and link to public-access databases such as PubMed when possible. AdamRetchless 20:05, 2 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: scientific references

message: I looked high and low for a recommendation on referring to printed matter. I wound up finding some articles with a style that looked plausible and went with that for the article in question. Here's a first attempt at a recommendation (I thought it better to put it up for discussion here rather than just drop it in):
:To refer to a book or magazines in your article, start a new level-2 heading at the bottom of the article titled "Further Reading", followed by a list of publications. Books in the list should have the following format:
:*Author/Editor Name, Book Title (Publisher, City) 
:Magazines in the list should have the following format:
:*Author Name, "Article Title" Periodical Title edition # (Date): pages X-Y; ISSN 12345678
Points to resolve:
* Is "Further Reading" the best title for this section?
* Should there be a preferred order of appearance of outside-reading sections (external links, related articles in wikipedia, etc)
adamrice 18:53, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. That covers similar (though not the same) ground I'm trying to get at. Perhaps the '"See also" and "Related topics"' section of the style manual could be expanded a bit...? adamrice 20:25, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommended style for book references
Talk:Foreign relations of Grenada

message: "Grenada has been recognized by most members of the United Nations" -from the article ( bold added)
Are there really any UN members that refuse to recognize Grenada?  This seems rather unlikely to me.--Pharos 07:32, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled