lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WSHH

message: I would like to point out that according to what I know, Tony Renda had purchased WSHH from Nationwide in 1980. It was that same year that Nationwide sold sister WKTQ to Benni Broadcasting. The two stations co-existed under separate ownership in the same Crane Ave. building until a year later when Renda bought WJAS. That was, without any doubt, the only time to two stations weren't sisters.
PBRTV 05:00, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:The Philippine Star

message: I added the latest survey news.
--Florentino floro 05:01, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2007 comment

message: This has been restored... actually the last I saw this the article wasn't as blatant as it is now, so if anyone can help in cleaning this up it'll be great. --Howard the Duck 16:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Restored
Talk:Choctaw Country

message: The article currently says Kiamichi Country "contains Oklahoma's largest lake by surface area, Eufaula Lake."  But isn't much, perhaps even most(?), of Lake Eufaula in McIntosh County—which is in Green Country?  GreenGourd 17:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lake Eufaula

message: I am proposing a merge of Little Dixie (Oklahoma) into this article, and also a rename of this article to Southeastern Oklahoma. The two articles are obviously attempting to cover the same material, and Southeastern Oklahoma seems to be the more common name for the area. If anyone would like to discuss the merge, I ask that it please be done at Talk:Little Dixie (Oklahoma) as it would be nice to keep the discussion in one place. If you would like to discuss the move to "Southeastern Oklahoma", here would be as good a place as any. Thanks :) Okiefromokla complaints 21:03, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I responded at Talk:Little Dixie (Oklahoma).  Unless I'm confused, however, there you say you prefer to keep a separate entry for Little Dixie (Oklahoma), and I agree with that.  In general, I think the concepts you've listed are sufficiently separate to justify separate entries.  Best wishes.  GreenGourd (talk) 00:43, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge and rename
Talk:Fort Frances–International Falls International Bridge

message: I crossed this bridge in 2005.  It is owned by the paper company on whose property it is located (there are mills on both sides of the river), if I remember correctly.  I do not recall the name of the company, but it should be possible to find this out.  121a0012 05:25, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership 
Talk:21 Astor Place

message: I see the notability is questioned. It's notable (though might be better as part of Astor Place (Manhattan)). See Nadine Brozan,  POSTINGS: On a Triangular Site at 21 Astor Place; 50 Ultramodern Condominiums Behind an Exterior From 1890, New York Times, April 6, 2003. Plenty there to expand the article, the building has housed some important institutions. - Jmabel | Talk 06:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notablity: yes 

message: You might want to consider making this a part of [[Astor Place (Manhattan) instead of outright deletion. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 20:56, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed deletion
Talk:Robert E. Lee: Civil War General

message: *https://web.archive.org/web/19970606085635/http://www.next-generation.com:80/news/051796cc.html
*https://web.archive.org/web/19980204074319/http://www.next-generation.com:80/features/e3.html
*https://books.google.com/books?id=PQnEyUwwXt8C&pg=PA462&dq=civil+war+general+sierra+on-line&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiQk9aI9d_VAhUh7oMKHQklDaoQ6AEIOjAE#v=onepage&q=civil%20war%20general%20sierra%20on-line&f=false
*https://web.archive.org/web/19961019035640/http://www.ogr.com:80/news/news0896.html
*https://archive.org/stream/Computer_Gaming_World_Issue_149#page/n219/mode/2up/
*https://archive.org/stream/Computer_Gaming_World_Issue_141#page/n61/mode/2up/
*https://web.archive.org/web/19970101040007/http://www.cdmag.com:80/war_vault/robert_e_lee_general/page1.html
*https://web.archive.org/web/19970101004614/http://www.cdmag.com:80/archive.html
*https://web.archive.org/web/19970101034927/http://www.cdmag.com:80/war_vault/robert_e_lee_general_review/page1.html
*https://archive.org/stream/UneditedPCGamer_marktrade/PC_Gamer_022u#page/n43/mode/2up
*https://web.archive.org/web/19970606062133/http://www.next-generation.com:80/news/041096e.html
*https://web.archive.org/web/19970605143946/http://www.next-generation.com:80/news.chtml
*https://archive.org/stream/InterAction_Magazine_Summer_1996_1996_Sierra_On-Line_US#page/n33/mode/2up/
*https://archive.org/stream/UneditedPCGamer_marktrade/PC_Gamer_016u#page/n41/mode/2up/
*https://web.archive.org/web/19970101034836/http://www.cdmag.com:80/war_vault/robert_e_lee_hints/page1.html
*https://archive.org/stream/InterAction_Magazine_Holiday_1995_1995_Sierra_On-Line_US#page/n101/mode/2up/
*https://web.archive.org/web/19970113102241/http://www1.sierra.com:80/entertainment/civilwar/
JimmyBlackwing (talk) 04:12, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference material
Talk:Cottonwood Canyon Road

message: I added the cleanup tag (and the "coord missing" tag); this article is written as a howto, unfortunately. tedder (talk) 22:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup 

message: I moved this sentence to talk because it is a comparison to a road that doesn't have an article.  Is it appropriate/relevant to this article?  RJFJR (talk) 23:01, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparison

message: 68.230.70.134 (talk) 16:18, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  thanks 
Talk:Ford Courier

message: The 2nd generation Courier used the same front grille and other parts for both the Mazda and Ford badged versions. The article needs images of the Mazda 1st gen version and of the 2nd gen version. Bizzybody (talk) 08:06, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd generation front 

message: There was a lot of history deleted in the 17 October 2010 revisions. Was that deliberate or accidental? GTHO (talk)
:It was relocated to Mazda B-Series as this Ford Courier page should really be a set index article. OSX (talk • contributions) 23:55, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History deletion 

message: I remove speculation and rumours about a 2022 Focus based pick-up!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.98.114.2 (talk) 08:22, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation and rumour
Talk:The Chronicles of Riddick: Assault on Dark Athena

message: Issue 186 Page 24 of Game Informer states this game has been cancelled due to the decision of Activision Blizzard (who merged Vivendi into them) --The Virginian (talk) 03:37, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It is unknown still. It is no 100% confirmed.--SkyWalker (talk) 06:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

text: The sources within this article are more recent than and supersede that one. It hasn't been cancelled. --68.255.6.203 (talk) 18:43, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancelled
Talk:Montpelier Mansion (Laurel, Maryland)

message: I thought I could copy text as long as it was attributed.  I have removed and rewritten article Quarterczar 20:39, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Major Thomas, so called for his work in the American Civil War. Major Thomas married Anne Ridgely and built the Mansion circa 1783."
This means someone who was active in the Civil War (in the 1860s) built a mansion in the 1780s?  Anyone building a mansion in the 1780s would have had to have been born in the 1760s or earlier.  Such a person would have been over 100 years old at the time of the Civil War.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.142.38.17 (talk) 14:02, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch.  I removed the 'civil war' phrase, provided some citations, and noted the need for more. —Adavidb 13:06, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ? 
Talk:American Monetary Institute

message: Doesn't sound like an "advertisement" at all to me. It's short, formal, and to the point and factual. I've
seen advertisement-link pages on wikipedia (see pages on 'professional gamblers' 
pages linked to from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabriel_Kaplan#Poker for example) but this is 
not one of them.--Harel 06:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I can see that there's a point to editing the article so it reviews Zaralenga's work in such a way that it posits alternatives, and gives it a more neutral point of view. However, it would be mostly my own views, and that could be problematic in itself. I wouldn't want stuff to get edited out on that basis. What's the situation ?
JohnAugust (talk) 23:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "it would be mostly my own views, and that could be problematic" - that's definitely problematic on Wikipedia. See WP:OR. Thanks for asking! --Chriswaterguy talk 23:24, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored the edits, and also cited some references. I feel I overstated the issue earlier. Some people make an ambit claim which understates matters, I tend to make one which overstates matters for the sake of clarity and boldness. The summary was my own words, but it was nevertheless based on other's assertions and maintained a NPOV. I maintain it represents a worthwhile edit.JohnAugust (talk) 21:51, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible edit 

message: Why put so much emphasis on Zarlenga's ideas about historical currencies, and promote WP:FRINGE ideas in wikipedia's voice? bobrayner (talk) 18:45, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A concern
Talk:The Skatalites

message: I think this article links to the wrong Johnny Moore. Kappa 06:16, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Add band history between 1989 and 2004, with for example, the "Ball of Fire" album in 1998.
* Underline the evolution of the band from the 90's to the 2010's: most early members, some early members, 2 remaining early members.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.209.27.96 (talk) 20:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo list

message: hi, i want to know if skatalites is pronounced "ska-talites" or "skat-talites"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.73.5.199 (talk) 00:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Whichever you prefer. But I think it's supposed to rhyme with 'satellites'. Rothorpe (talk) 20:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: band name pronunciation

message: Why does this article say both that this band was established in 1963 (in the article's text) and established in 1964 (in the infobox)? Please choose one or the other, the one that's true! 98.123.38.211 (talk) 01:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  To fix
Talk:Wimbledon and Sutton Railway

message: In his "The Railways of Great Britain: A Historical Atlas", Colonel Cobb has a date of "1929" for the opening of the line. Of course this is only five days out from the Sutton Council website date! Sunil060902 (talk) 17:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, my mistake! Wimbledon to South Merton only is shown as having opened in 1929, the rest in 1930. Sunil060902 (talk) 18:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colonel Cobb 

message: A present connection to Tramlink seems to be shown. Is there one? The former use of Tramlink's line as a railway line with its connection should be shown. But how by pictograms without much text?--SilasW (talk) 16:15, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've put the old line instead - does this make any sense? There is no longer any physical connection between Dundonald Road Tramstop and Wimbledon main line stations. Hopefully interchange Roundel at the main line station should suffice? best, Sunil060902 (talk) 16:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query about line diagram
Talk:OWS

message: An "Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome" is a specific entity, and you will want to find more than you can under Opioid#Dependence -- Robodoc.at (talk) 23:27, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Gott 13:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

message: I deleted following links from the disamb.-page: 
m Gott 12:59, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links for Optinonal White Space
Talk:Vane

message: These articles, when compared to the definitions in Wiktionary, do not seem to include the following type of vane:
"Any of several usually relatively thin, rigid, flat, or sometimes curved surfaces radially mounted along an axis, as a blade in a turbine or a sail on a windmill, that is turned by or used to turn a fluid."
That seems to be the type mentioned on the Baffle disambig page:
"Baffle (in vessel), a flow-directing vane or panel in some vessels such as shell and tube heat exchangers, chemical reactors, or static mixers."
"Baffle vanes" are also mentioned in the Cold trap article, and I'm sure elsewhere as well. I'm sorry that all I can do is point out that an article is needed, and then a link to that article should be added here. 
Thanks, 
--Geekdiva (talk) 00:22, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a vane article discussing baffle vanes
Talk:Mike Coolbaugh

message: When did he play catcher?  I don't recall his being a catcher (we list him as a third baseman), but the picture shows him wearing a catcher's helmet.  Can we get another picture or explain the one we have? --Idont Havaname (Talk) 00:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The one he have seems to be a copywritten image, so I believe it'll soon be deleted anyway. matt91486 01:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a difference between a regular helmet and what the catcher wears. It just looks like it is turned around. He is wearing a chest protecter however. --Tom 01:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  His image 

message: The article says he spent 11 seasons in the minor leagues. But his stats page suggest he played for 17 years. Do some of those teams he played for not count as "minor league" teams, or is the number 11 wrong? AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 06:26, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that the intended meaning is that he spent 11 seasons in the minors before making his MLB debut. He played 11 seasons before that, but a total of 17 in his career. NatureBoyMD (talk) 13:46, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes more sense . I'd like to expand the playing career to explain how he came to be playing for a different team in his 11th season than the one that drafted him. This page suggests he hopped around quite a few clubs during his career. Is it a reliable source? AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:44, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: , I think Baseball-Almanac is considered reliable. You can also use his Baseball-Reference profile for the same transaction data. NatureBoyMD (talk) 02:52, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of seasons in the minors 
Talk:Maroon 5/Archive 2

message: Check this out. --LaraLoveTalk/Contribs 02:59, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Broken link. ― LADY GALAXY ★彡  Refill/lol 04:20, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at this interview Jesse also says teh group won't be around for long!! Awwww!! Crazilazigurl07 talk 21:05, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Maroon 5 near the end?

message: According to WP:ICT, "For an image to be considered "free" under Wikipedia's Image use policy, the license must permit both commercial reuse and derivative works." In the case of living persons, it is possible to obtain a free-use image, as was the image in place previous to this one. WP:FU states that an examples of unacceptable use includes "An image of a living person that merely shows what s/he looks like. The rationale is that this is potentially replaceable with a freshly produced free photograph." Free use images of all members of the band together can easily be obtained. This image is inappropriate for use on Wikipedia. --LaraLoveT/C 17:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This image was listed WP:PUI, but, because it is licensed as a non-free copyrighted image with a fair use rationale, action could not be taken there. It is now listed WP:FUR. LaraLoveT/C 18:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:Maroon5Promotional.jpg]] is inappropriate

message: You've got Mickey Madden and James Valentine mixed up in your photo description.  Needs to be changed. (BC) 21 May 2007.
:Actually, they were switched earlier. Someone corrected it this morning, I believe. Mickey is on the left, James on the right. --LaraLoveT/C 19:47, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mickey and James switched in caption

message: how can i make a page for Mickey and Jesse. I have enough info on them for them to have there own page. I dont think its fair that Adam Levine has his own and not the others. i helped with the Matt Flynn page if you need to see my work
Crazilazigurl07 20:37, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mickey Madden and other bandmates
Talk:F.E.A.R. Perseus Mandate

message: i'm sick of ppl bashing this game of bad level design! can they come up with something new?!!!! and believe me, it's difficult making a game!Paulalex19 (talk) 19:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I'm sick

message: The title of the article should be F.E.A.R.: Perseus Mandate, no? SharkD (talk) 22:12, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title
Talk:Game Makers

message: Seeing as this has just about the same content and is the same show as Icons (TV series), how about a merger? -- Jelly Soup (talk) 02:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a good idea. I'll put tags up. I think the difference could be made clear by simple notation as through the addition of a new column on a table. -Thibbs (talk) 17:22, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, in reality, no they aren't. Icons was a totally new revamp of Icons (Gamemakers). That's like calling Ultimate Mortal Kombat 3, Mortal Kombat 3. While it has similar gameplay, characters, etc. they are still two different things entirely. Instead, why not add a disambiguation at the top of the page of the modern Icons saying something along the lines of  "This is not to be confused with the series Gamemakers which had this alias under its 2002-2005 airing."  While simply separating seasons one-three onto Gamemakers and season four on Icons? Subzerosmokerain (talk) 23:24, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Sir Francis Fletcher-Vane, 5th Baronet

message: User Scolaire deleted material from this page which is informative and valuable. I am undoing his deletion accordingly. The material links this page to Francis Sheehy-Skeffington's page, and one of Vane's chief claims to fame is his righteous role in the story of Sheehy-Skeffington's murder.Wwallacee (talk) 08:09, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: And therefore this article should link to the Sheehy-Skeffington article. Which it does. What I removed was a hatnote that said "For the murder exposed by Major Sir Francis Fletcher Vane, see Francis Sheehy-Skeffington". That's like having a hatnote on the George W. Bush article saying "For the Tyrant opposed by George W. Bush, see Saddam Hussein". It's silly and pointless, and not what hatnotes are meant for. I recommend adding a short sentence on the Sheehy-Skeffington murder to the lead.  Scolaire (talk) 08:27, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

text: You "recommend" - why don't you do instead? Scolaire, the proper action if you feel that material needs improvement is not to remove said material, but to improve it. [Redacted] Wwallacee (talk) 08:41, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: If a thing doesn't belong in an article, then it can't be improved. The hatnote didn't belong. It could not be improved, only removed.  Scolaire (talk) 09:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit 
Talk:Men of Valor

message: This was either written by an non-native English speaker, or a six year old child. Someone please edit this.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.199.31.136 (talk) 20:48, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot Summary

message: In the Infobox, the "Platform(s)" field includes "PC".  I think that the "Platform(s)" field should specify a value or values from the " Supported platforms" section of the  Vgclegend template.  For example, if Men of Valor only runs on MS-DOS, then Men of Valor's Infobox should specify "DOS" in the "Platform(s)" field.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProResearcher (talk • contribs) 00:40, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 
Talk:Thornton Blackburn

message: The title for this article contains an error.  The correct spelling of the first name is "Thornton" rather than "Thorton".  Please help me correct it.Tonymartin 06:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: For some reason, myriad articles like this one are careful to mention U.S. states, but omit the names of provinces. It's not uncommon to read even more specific U.S. references, such as cities, counties, rivers, highways, etc. Why some writers are satisfied that 'Canada' is sufficient baffles me. Whether referring to the modern nation which touches three oceans, the vast province of Ontario, or even the historic province of Upper Canada, care should be given to note cities, towns, counties, etc., with the same courtesy extended to U.S. locations. I've replaced the several 'Canada' references here with the name of the province: Upper Canada, which it was in 1833, and Essex County in particular, established in 1792. If I can confirm the village name the Thorntons arrived in, I'll add that as well, for if Detroit can be named, so should Sandwich or Amherstburg. Yoho2001 (talk) 10:52, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Canada' is never specific enough 

message: Several deeds for the Smith family in Virginia include Sibby.  That family came to Washington, Kentucky in 1792, and Sibby continues in deeds there.  Also, her death record in Toronto gives her name as Sibby Thornton.  If you have information showing her name was Mubby and not Sibby, please let me know.  We're including Thornton's story in a museum in Old Washington, KY. BertiePetie (talk) 17:13, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thornton's mother's name was Sibby, not Mubby
Template talk:Rp

message: I'd like to suggest including in this article some guidance on spacing between an  page number and a subsequent (adjacent) reference number – whether or not another  is involved – for reasons of typographical aesthetics. As you know, in default two successive references look like this:
Inserting a thin space (equal to a narrow no-break space; also equal to half of a standard space) produces:
For comparison (I think it's too wide), a single standard space produces:
Over to you for discussion.  :-). SCHolar44 (talk) 05:43, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spacing between Rp and the next (adjacent) reference 

message: I chanced upon ref extends a moment ago. The docs there state that this feature is only available in the beta cluster. But it might be worth mentioning in the documentation here that this is another possible solution, already in the pipe for special users, and perhaps in the pipe for everyone, someday. — MaxEnt 03:07, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the  feature of the CS1/CS2 templates already makes  effectively obsolete (and I say that as the author of the template). It was very much needed when first invented, but has really been surprassed now. For a crash course on effective use of , see User talk:SMcCandlish/Archive 199#Page-ception.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  09:23, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ref extends 

message: SMcCandlish, I am not sure how it is nonsensical: for an individual, overuse either makes it hard to read, or it does not. If enough editors (who are readers, if not a perfect representation) have said it is hard to read, such that the point should be represented here, I don't understand the purpose of adding a layer of vaguery on top of it. Remsense留 23:38, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It wasn't about "seen to do" versus "can do" something (and I just switched to the latter wording; I never cared about that). It was nonsensical because "Overuse of this template can make prose harder to read for some users. Used judiciously, however, other editors say that ..." starts with a statement of alleged fact (which is really just an opinion), and follows it with a statement of opinion not masquerading as fact, and then pits the "fact" (opinion) of some readers ("to read for some users" = "users who are reading" = "readers") versus the opinion of some , but they are not the same category. Anyway, I fixed it  just now.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  23:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  meaning of "Seen to be" distinction