Talk:Foremarke Hall

message: (This exchange is titled by WiKID Daryl for the sake of neatness)
Its a good page about the building, but less good as a school page. Maybe the building and school need different pages as the school is a relatively recent tenant of the building ... Victuallers 14:55, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Blah

message: The main item for B claa is refs. OK It does have a few refs that were added by "someone". The rest of the article is uncited. This is particularly important with the Myths stuff which I'm not sure will ever make it into a wiki unless the myths are ported in a reliable(ish) source.
Oh and you were lucky I saw this ... try Schools Project or my talk page Victuallers 19:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: B Class?

message: In the original text before I re-edited it, it reads in the history section:
Foremarke Hall was built as a Stately home evidently for Sir Robert Burdett's son - Francis Burdett[citation needed] in 1760 by David Hiorns - a famous architect then whose architectural firm in London still thrives today. [2] The building is therefore of Georgian and Palladian architectural style with imposing portico, cursive, round domes, chamber/pillars and a magnificent south front.
Additionally, the annotations of the photo of Sir Francis Burdett described him to be the son of Sir Robert Burdett, 4th Baronet; which is nonsense; as in the case of the above paragraph: 
My older edits clearly established that Sir Francis Burdett (5th Baronet) was not the son of Sir Robert Burdett, 4th Baronet but the son of a Burdett with the same first name- Francis Burdett (1743) who did not inherit the Baronetcy of Foremark from his father.  
Strangely enough; the user who altered that content from my older edits still managed to get it wrong despite the clear explicit facts I have already written out...   
The user clearly wasn't familiar with the subject matter. If he/she would have spent a little more time to research properly by viewing the pages of the members of the Burdett Family it would have been impossbible for he/she to make such a mistake. 
Next time, anyone who decides to write anything should make sure they are certain with what they are writing before doing so; so that they don't waste precious time and effort of others spent re-establishing things previously established.
--WiKID Daryl (talk) 18:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Factual Error & Confusion

message: I think this article needs to be reassessed for quality, it's getting too damn good to deserve a B-Class rating! :P 
Somebody please help! lol
--WiKID Daryl (talk) 23:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Foremarke Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120708185622/http://foremarke.org.uk/foremarke-in-tatlers-top-100-992011 to http://foremarke.org.uk/foremarke-in-tatlers-top-100-992011
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:32, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified