Talk:Baden-Württemberg-class frigate

message: It says, it's got the highest displacement among destroyer class ships and the displacement is given at 7,200 tonnes. On the page of Arleigh Burke class it says, those got more than 8,000 tonnes.
This gives some sort of inconsistency, meaning either a) the allegation "biggest displacement" is incorrect, b) Baden-Württemberg is not a destroyer class ship, c) Arleigh Burkes are not destroyer class ships, d) the displacement tonnages given on either the Arleigh Burke or this article are incorrect. e) any combination of aforementioned
15:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Displacement 

message: This article is woefully inadequate. The external links contain abundant information on this class, including the rationale behind its atypical weapons fit. With no context, it is not obvious what these ships are meant to do, and that might lead to significant misunderstandings. I gather there is an underlying controversy as well, and it isn't reflected at all in this page. I'd update the page myself, but surely SOMEONE knows more than what I learned in 15 minutes on naval-technology, and I'm not really familiar with that particular source. 66.68.88.116 (talk) 01:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  UPDATE NEEDED! 

message: News says they are actually going to build this thing. I was surprised, as it looks such a strange design. Why shore bombardment if you haven't got any amphibs? If you want some intervention capability, something like the Mistral class landing platform dock looks like much better value for money. Leibniz 12:35, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We need one. Dfrg.msc  1 . 2 . 3 08:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 

message: "According to news in May 2009, during the first test of the "Oldenburg" a screw fell into the transmission, causing serious damage. More research has shown several major design flaws in the swiss engine transmissions. All five ships have been shut down. Current estimates of the ships entering service are 2011 (planned was the first ship seeing active service in May 2007)."
The "Oldenburg" is a K-130-class ship and has nothing to do with the F-125-class.
I´m not a native english-speaker, so i don´t want to edit. But somebody should, thx. --82.82.139.68 (talk) 13:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: paragrapgh removedNevfennas (talk) 17:11, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  K-130 

message: Any idea what AA capability F125 got ??? 
I can see two RAM launchers (CIWS) would be funny to have such limited air defence?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.220.53.72 (talk) 11:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air Defence SAM Capability 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:F125GERMAN NAVY.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/f125-frigate/
*:Triggered by \bnaval-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 10:48, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on F125-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927203251/http://www.abcmoney.co.uk/news/04200751286.htm to http://www.abcmoney.co.uk/news/04200751286.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:58, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Baden-Württemberg-class frigate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150130023758/http://www.newsletter-verteidigung.de/freie-newsletter/freie-nv-inhalte-2014/file/281-nv-ausgabe-01-2014.html to http://www.newsletter-verteidigung.de/freie-newsletter/freie-nv-inhalte-2014/file/281-nv-ausgabe-01-2014.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140727233111/http://seefahrer.blog.de/2013/02/06/fregatte-nrw-bericht-kiellegung-15506450/ to http://seefahrer.blog.de/2013/02/06/fregatte-nrw-bericht-kiellegung-15506450/
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130118183627/http://www.blohmvoss-naval.com/en/class-125.html to http://www.blohmvoss-naval.com/en/class-125.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified