lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fulfordgate

message: Google Maps - 
Well written article: 
Haven't got the time to incorporate the details Me677 23:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've started adding some info into the article. Mattythewhite 16:49, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also  Me677 23:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
#Is it reasonably well written?
#:A. Prose quality:  
#:: 
#:B. MoS compliance: 
#:: 
#Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
#:A. References to sources:  
#:: 
#:B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
#:: 
#:C. No original research: 
#:: 
#Is it broad in its coverage?
#:A. Major aspects:  
#:: 
#:B. Focused: 
#:: 
#Is it neutral?
#:Fair representation without bias: 
#:: 
#Is it stable?
#: No edit wars, etc: 
#:: 
#Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
#:A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
#:: 
#:B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: 
#:: 
#Overall: 
#:Pass or Fail: 
#:: 
#:::Expanding the article would be considerably difficult as I have pretty much squeezed out everything mentioned in the YCFC book. Looking at the sources found by User:Harkey Lodger, it seems as if no new content is included, and the first of these appears to be a direct copy from the book. Getting an image of the ground would be quite impossible, as it was demolished around 75 years ago, but I do have the coordinates to the area and could try and get a caption of the current land. Thanks for the review, Mattythewhite (talk) 08:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was thinking of an old, even copyrighted image; a case could be made for fair use under the circumstances. скоморохъ 08:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Only image I can find is this. Mattythewhite (talk) 08:25, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there nothing in York City: A Complete Record 1922-1990 that could be scanned? скоморохъ 08:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope, no image of the ground included. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Failed good article nomination 

message: I don't know if you know this one http://www.yorkcitysouth.co.uk/xdb-bc011.htm I came across it by accident and thought it might help with info.--Harkey Lodger (talk) 07:35, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Try this
Talk:On Raglan Road

message: 5 & 10 are the same. 9 is rateyourmusic. The RTE archive reference only names Luke Kelly, Sinead O Connor & Van Morrison so maybe delete the other unreferenced covers. (78.17.116.81 (talk) 22:59, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source info 

message: This song was voted Ireland's favourite folk song in 2019. It was revealed on the Late Late Show 31st May. (78.17.116.81 (talk) 23:02, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Ireland's favourite folk song
Talk:The Raincoats (Seinfeld)

message: What is a "close talker"?  Rayasmith 20:04, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Answered in article. InkQuill (talk) 02:09, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: giant flier inside the newspaper box (very beginning) has this.  i cannot read the fine print; i guess something like "4 sections" plus "7 days a week" equals "11 good reasons to buy"?
does anyone recognize the campaign, or, barring that, does anyone have better screen rez that they can read those subtitles?
TIA! 209.172.23.203 (talk) 23:26, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  4+7=11 

message: This article mentions an Emmy nomination for the show but doesn't say for whom.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.65.127.105 (talk) 03:22, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outstanding who?
Talk:Walter C. Flower

message: * 
* 
* 
*  Smkolins 01:58, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  some sources
File talk:Building and ship comparison.svg

message: What kind of ship is the unlabeled magenta one? Madd the sane 20:08, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, the ship is the RMS Queen Mary 2 and is 345m long. I have updated the image page. Thanks for pointing it out. Fosnez 09:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  name of unidentified ship
Talk:Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain

message: isn't this part of the German organization? Misheu 20:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was a seperate but now that you mention it, the websites are copies of each other. Why dont they mention each other? They should. I'm not sure what to do then for now. Maybe we could leave it unless they specify that they're all branches of each other. One group is british and the other is german. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 19:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's more than that - they have the same emblem. shouldn't the two entries be merged? Misheu 19:52, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright then, I support the merge. --Matt57 (talk•contribs) 23:00, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I merged the two, though I admit I'm unsure whether they should be, after further thought. Misheu 08:59, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've split it off again. They function practically independent, and treating them separately avoids confusion. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 18:04, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 merger
Talk:Alf Kumalo

message: Why is the article Lemma written with an H (Khumalo), but his name written without H in the article (Kumalo)? -- Aspiriniks (talk) 16:38, 23 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the page to the most common spelling.--Racklever (talk) 09:17, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lemma wrong? 
Talk:Time of Violence

message: Isn't the actual title of the film the same as the book: Време разделно?
Is Време на насилие a sort of a nick title? Căluşaru' (talk) 14:24, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual title 

message: Before requesting semi-protection, I'd really like to know what the relevance of the section added by the floating-IP annon is. It is not in proper English. And then - the quote is not really about the film. "and I think that's an important point about movies. They exist during those two hours. If you make them, you hope that they have some echo, but the only thing you really have to do for the audience to buy in is to be true to the world you create for those two hours. If it's a world in which people have superhuman powers and can jump higher and faster - if you set that up early and stay true to it - then people will buy it." How is this text about the movie? Moreover, this is a direct quote of a direct quote from a book probably. Plagiarism does not drive wikipedia forward. Please, explain the relevance of the section or simply stop adding it back again and again without any proper justification. --Laveol T 16:34, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the persistent disruption and absence of will to discuss from the floating ip, I've requested semi-protection.--Susuman77 (talk) 11:23, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical reception
Talk:El Gorah

message: "North Camp in El Gorah was the victim of a horrific string of Joseph and Mary robberies during the Christmas of 2005. The culprit was never caught but the message "No one cares I work in the tool room" was found at the scene." 
Could someone please define 'Joseph and Mary robbery'?  In addition, could someone please provide details for this particular 'horrific string of Joseph and Mary robberies"?
HopefulRomantic 20:14, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

message: As near as I can tell, and from asking those who may know more about the subject than I, a Joseph and Mary robbery is a loose reference to Joseph and Mary 'stealing out of Egypt' icognito with the baby Jesus, a posteriori.  It remains that the paragraph about the Joseph and Mary robberies of Christmas Day 2005 is seemingly unsubstantiated and moot for this article.  However, it would be nice if the author of the statement could provide some extension about the toolroom cryptic note.  As I recall, that toolroom contained a whirligig and generator.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by HopefulRomantic (talk • contribs) 17:53, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense in that context, but as I noted above I still think the whole entry was nothing more than a spam/malicious website luring attempt. - Ahunt (talk) 18:46, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joseph and Mary Robberies 

message: Assuming this is true, it would be nice to have a citation to make it encyclopedic: 'Egyptian tourist sites have occasionally drawn stares from the locals when asked where they live when they respond, "El Gorah".' Piano non troppo (talk) 13:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, I have fact tagged it, hopefully someone can find a ref. - Ahunt (talk) 13:30, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This statement has remained unsourced for nine months and I have been unable to confirm that it is correct - so it is gone. - Ahunt (talk) 15:27, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Funny enough to cite
Talk:Little Soldiers

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Kutty Sippaigal. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 5#Kutty Sippaigal until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:01, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kutty Sippaigal" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Antonio Imbert Barrera

message: The following is unsourced information:
*Designated president of the Council of Administration of the Dominican Rosary in 1989. 
*Officially declarated a National Hero.
*General Advitam.
*Decorated with the Order of Merit of Duarte, Sanchez and Mella.
While this is interesting, we can't use it unless you provide a source. Also, none of this is really trivia, as trivia by its definition is "unimportant information" - it therefore shouldn't be in a trivia section but instead the information should be incorporated into the main article. - Tbsdy lives (talk) 07:59, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 
Talk:Paris Bound

message: This page was tagged as a G7 but there is no explanation why. If you readd the speedy tag, please explain why the page should be deleted Spartaz Humbug! 15:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CSD Tag

message: I just watched this movie on archive.org.  The plot described here does not match the movie in some big ways.  I'm confused.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.46.65.138 (talk) 02:39, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot does not match the movie available on archive.org
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Peru/navigation

message: Hi... how about changing the text in the main headers from black into white? Black on red is not a good combination for reading. Personally i think white on red looks better.AgainErick 20:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: good idea, I'll do it if you don't mind. Although I know white wouldn't be the color that has more contrast to #FF3434 --Andersmusician $ 02:14, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What about using a darker shade of red for the background? The same tone of red as that of the Peruvian flag would be nice. --Victor12 12:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

text: I think there's no official Peru red color, and I think a dark one might not look as background.--Andersmusician VOTE 16:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I changed two of the boxes. take a look and compare. AgainErick 17:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I like the darker one... If we go for that one we would also need to change the blue letters of ACID in "Peru related ACID". --Victor12 18:05, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: well I still think light colors here make the page look prettier and not so compact.--Andersmusician VOTE 16:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of Polish gminas

message: I noticed that there are two different ways of referring to a Polish municipality/commune on this list. Very few of them actually have an article. (Most existing articles are associated with the main city of the commune.) Which one is standard, anyway? Backspace 20:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Commune is quite often used as a translation of gmina, but IMO it isn't quite common enough to be called standard, and in any case isn't a very useful translation (I think most English speakers would be more familiar with other meanings of the word, which could make it misleading). Since this list obviously needs making uniform, my proposal would be to leave names of the form Gmina Xxx untranslated, and (in cases where there is no separate gmina article) to direct the links to the corresponding town article. Any other views? Kotniski 07:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  In the light of the above, and lack of expressed opposition, I've made the list uniform based on the "Gmina Xxx" convention. I believe I've fixed all the existing links (using redirects). In fact there are now more blue links than before, since some articles were 'hiding' as Gmina Xx.--Kotniski 19:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Xxxxx Commune" vs. "gmina Xxxxx"

message: Having bot-created stub articles for all missing gminas, I am now reconstructing this list to eliminate errors and provide more information. To keep the page size manageable, I am splitting the list into subpages, one per initial letter. (Note diacritics are ignored for alphabetical ordering purposes, since this is English Wikipedia). The list would probably look better in the form of a table though... --Kotniski (talk) 21:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reconstruction
Talk:Damon Scott

message: I'm giving this page an overhaul now, if things look unfinished in the next hour or 2 then please hold before editing as I'm probably on the case! Any comments please add here. --Markeandrews 20:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Overhaul finished for now. I'll be returning to this in the coming days. --Markeandrews 21:40, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The tone that this article uses is completely inappropriate- I haven't even read it, but still there are phrases like "hilarious monkey act" and "hit TV show" jumping out at me. This article could use work. J Milburn (talk) 16:37, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter what the article is about, we still use the neutral point of view. I didn't personally think he was that funny, but that doesn't matter, and that doesn't mean that I can't comment on or edit "your article". J Milburn (talk) 21:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 
File talk:This.Is.Sparta GN.to.film.jpg

message: Who is the black guy being kicked by Leonidas? User:24.74.39.120
:The initial Persian Messenger sent to to Leonidas. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 22:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is madness! Armyrifle 00:56, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Madness? ~九尾の氷狐~ (「Sumimasen!」 「Dochira samaka?」) 03:41, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: THIS...IS...SPARTA!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.239.110.74 (talk) 14:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Roland Ritchie

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 20:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Multidrop bus

message: "but electronically are limited to [...] and 10–20 cm distance (SCSI-1 has 6 meters)."
What is this trying to say?  It jumps from talking in of a 20cm limit, to talking a limit of a 6m implementation, as if this follows logically.
:Is it possibly a typo? Should it read "10-20m"? The examples listed would suggest that 20cm is wrong. 81.179.128.128 12:39, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I added a lot to this section as I was developing vending equipment employing this standard in the 1980s on NEC-V20 processors (X86 compatible) and am now developing vending systems with coin, cash, debit, credit, and crypto-currency payments (including Bitcoin #BTC) using STM32F10x embedded controllers.  I've worked with MDB when it was a proprietary protocol, and when it was standardized. I can't locate references for some of the information (yet) though I know I have seen a history of MDB on the web or in a document somewhere recently, which discussed the strange politics around Coke forcing Coinco to open-up their proprietary technology to competitors. 
I corrected an error which said the protocol was invented in 1992. It was well entrenched by 1992, but that was the year that it was publicly released. By 1990 I had deployed vending equipment on 4 continents using MDB for the coin-acceptor interface. --Bempey (talk) 07:13, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  multi-drop bus for vending 

message: Multi-drop also refers to communications lines, especially RS-485 (single-pair, half-duplex) and RS-422 (2-pair, full-duplex)--Bempey (talk) 07:11, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  multi-drop communications lines
Talk:Sonata on the 94th Psalm

message: Thank you for providing an entry for this great organ work. However, I am not entirely happy about the oft-quoted remark that it is inspired by Liszt's Fantasy and Fugue on the chorale Ad nos, ad salutarem undam. I think that a close examination of the relevant works will show that it has much greater conceptual and structural affinity with Liszt's Piano Sonata in B minor. It is a mistake to assume that one must look for an antecedent among the not-so-interesting organ works of Liszt, when the model is to be found in the piano sonata, a more recent and vastly superior work that must have been very present in Reubke's mind. The two sonatas show the interesting feature of building up to a midway "crisis point" expressed by heavy chords, which is not surpassed in intensity by the "official" climax at the end - a point missed by more organists in the Reubke sonata than by pianists in the Liszt sonata (I've heard those chords played on flutes - W. Kraft, St. Mary's, Lübeck, 1969). Reubke compensates with the brilliant harmonic progression of the left-hand chords in the concluding section - an object lesson in Sturm-und-Drang romantic harmony.- Uttenthal, Salamanca.87.49.96.9 20:34, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

message: It would be helpful to know the rationale(s) for the selection of the three recordings listed - whether an editor's personal choice or from critical reviews. Davidships (talk) 01:43, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recordings
Talk:Landwirtschaftliche Produktionsgenossenschaft

message: As interwiki links here from cs, I should say in Czech language it is called Jednotné zemědělské družstvo. So there might be necesary to rename it to something neutral.--Juan de Vojníkov (talk) 06:57, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Who's Your Caddy?

message: lil wayne only makes a cameo in this movie. he doesn't star. 24.99.172.205 07:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But he get top-billing anyway. --(trogga) 20:01, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lil Wayne 

message: I'm reasonably sure that this is basically a remake of "caddyshack". Does anyone else see this and think that it should be mentioned?
:Yes and no. --(trogga) 18:07, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because it's not a remake of Caddyshack. Most critics are calling it a bad rippoff of Caddyshack however, and that's already mentioned in the article. Nemeses9 03:01, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parody/remake? 

message: I added the controversy section, not to fan any flames, but to hopefully stem the high amount of vandalism this article is receiving and to expand upon the article in regard to a subject that cannot be ignored. --Notneb82 19:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy section 

message: This page is turning into nothing more than an edit war.  It was taged as a stub article to be expanded upon.  People expand on it and someone does not like what most want to point out about this film.  This film is indeed a controversal film and that subject needs to be addressed.  Consistantly deleting edits and marking them as vandalism is not helping.  If the neutrality of the edit is the problem, then mark it properly.  Secondly, forums are a viable source material.  The MLA directly addresses this here  scroll to the bottem of the page for a perfect example of a FORUM CITATION.  Furthurmore please before jumping the undo button please use this discussion area to aid in the clean-up and development of this article. --Notneb82 00:58, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit War 

message: Someone please edit the link (Lawrence Oliver) to the correct person.
The Laurence Olivier has been dead for some time now.
I also did a quick check on imdb and there seems to be no actor with that name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.74.38 (talk) 01:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking to Lawrence Olivier 

message: Came across the article a few days ago, and I saw there was a name ‘Hugh Jass’ on the cast, which is a gag name meaning ‘huge a*s’. There has been no mention of a ‘Hugh Jass’ in any of the sources and the edit was unsourced - could that be vandalism? 82.6.170.127 (talk) 11:08, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gag name - vandalism?
Talk:Kissology Volume Two: 1978–1991

message: According to RIAA, for multi disc video boxes (there of more discs), each disc counts as a unit towards the certification. Since this package has 3 discs, a 6× Platinum will certify 600,000 which amounts to 200,000 boxes. --Muhandes (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales 

message: I went ahead and removed "Rock And Roll All Nite" from the Rio set list. It is on the bootleg copies of this show, and it's erroneously listed on the box, but it's not actually on the disc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.139.65.20 (talk) 23:48, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rio Set List
Talk:University of Minnesota Medical School

message: I have added a section about the controversy about primate research going on at the U of M. Mnpfp 21:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: On 26 April 2023 an IP editor removed citation and advert maintenance tags. In the edit summary they said the issues were fixed. However, they were not.
Today, I made several more fixes, but I do not feel the threshold for removal of these tags have been reached. Itanalot (talk) 04:17, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  July 2022
Talk:Rock Township, Benson County, North Dakota

message: Does anyone else have knowledge of Rock Township? TRBUFF 14:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rock Township

message: The main source for this article is "Rock Township History, Benson County, 1904-1976." published by the Benson Co. Board of Supervisors, 1975. I'm trying to locate a copy to provide better inline citations, but have added the generic cite to the article. I am also working to clean up the article text itself. If anyone knows where to locate a copy of this book, we could use your help.DCmacnut<> 20:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Take a look at my changes and let me know if they work. I took out the comment about whist and other pastimes. Seemed to generic and could be applied to any rural area in North Dakota. My grandfather was a Whist champion in Morton County. If you have time, go through and add inline citations to those statements that may need additional verification. Route 4 and the homesteading history immediately come to mind. I'm interested in seeing that expanded on, because historically Indian tribes didn't voluntarily allow white settlers to homestead on tribal land. It usually was a one-sided event, so I'm interested in how this compromise was developed.DCmacnut<> 02:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Tochigi patricide case

message: Can anyone tell me that "their relationships" in "She [Rika] returned several years later, attempting to stop their relationships..." refer to the relationships between Rika and Takeo, or to those between Takeo and Chiyo? Thank you so much. --Aristitleism (talk) 19:39, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Their relationships"