lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Perfect Strangers (album)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 21:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: The references quoted are bogus. All are commercial media, none are primary sources and all are based on biased promotional material supplied by the band's record company. Remember music is a commercial product and it's promotion is most often spam, though sadly rarely identified as such -- especially on Wikiality which is heaven for music promoters.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.130.40 (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References

message: I don't think the review from Play should be included in the list as it is written by a Play customer and consists of a few
sentences.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.149.232.112 (talk) 15:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, removed. J04n(talk page) 16:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-professional review
Wikipedia talk:Forum for Encyclopedic Standards/Archive 2

message: I think the best way to accomplish your goal might be some way to have another tier for "approved" articles. The main level would keep the Wikipedia spirit. I also agree that we shouldn't set up a different class of users for PhDs. Maurreen 06:16, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Could we maybe set up something one step lower than Featured Articles for articles that have received some type of formal review and where the issues with the article are listed (but not necessarily yet addressed) and where those issues do not include POV issues or factual inaccuracies? -- Jmabel | Talk 07:56, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
It should be noted that featured articles are often pretty bad - clearly an intermediate stage seems problematic, since it could result in even worse articles than some of the really bad ones that have made it to featured status.  Greek mythology, for instance, appeared on the main page in an enormously horrible state. john k 08:37, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)

text: I haven't ever bothered looking systematically through the featured articles, but, jeez, if they are "pretty bad" shouldn't we be trying to get them removed from featured status? -- Jmabel | Talk 08:46, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
Well, of course.  I just think that the idea that an "approved" article should be intermediary between a normal article and a featured article is problematic, since featured articles are themselves often problematic.  Clearly, "approved" articles need to start with featured articles, and go from there...BTW, here's the Greek mythology article at the time it was featured: .  john k 09:11, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Two tiers

message: In my view, whatever this group comes up with should be an addition to Wikipedia. I hope I don't come off too harshly, but if anyone wants to change the basic nature, they should start their own encyclopedia, although it can build off Wikipedia. Maurreen 17:57, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Add-on only

message: It seems like there are two main areas of question. I'm not sure how clear I'm being, but I think the discussion can generally be divided between how to do this with people, and how to do it with computers. That is, for example, how to flag things is a computer issue. How to decide things is a people issue.
If we divide the discussion more or less like this, it could be easier to follow. If these aren't the best labels, please change them. 
Side note: I also agree that it would probably be better to start in a noncontentious area. Maurreen 17:57, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorial and technical processes
Talk:Pinhel

message: Seems like a kind of vanity page to me. — Darco 07:39, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD 
Talk:History of Timișoara

message: According to various sources, Paris (not Timisoara) was the European first city to get public electric lights. For example this http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v132/n3345/abs/132888c0.html states that first public electric lights in Paris were installed in 1878.
----  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andreid76 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested corrections

message: There are not many, if any sources quoted in this article. I would like to quote some passages in Geschichte Timişoaras, the German equivqalent to this article. Can the authors please reveal their sources?
Thanks, Dr-Victor-von-Doom  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.243.1.34 (talk) 07:32, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: , I think that unreferenced statements should not be restored without verifying them, especially because a template message. placed at the top of the article 3 years ago, says that any unverified claims can be removed from the article. Borsoka (talk) 03:10, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: , sorry I missed the template message.(KIENGIR (talk) 16:40, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:NOR
Talk:Carrot Top

message: Article rolled back due to vandalism by unregistered IP
--RichardMills65 (talk) 19:14, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: I was invited to attend a live show by Carrot Top a few years ago.  The language and imagery Thompson used could only be described as foul and offensive.  A number of members in the audience got up and walked out during the show.  One of my companions took the time later to register formal complaints to the venue management and to Thompson's manager.  His language and behavior on television are cleaned up compared to live shows, probably by use of editing; it is inconceivable that he would be allowed to perform unrestricted on a live broadcast, lest the broadcasting company risk losing its license.  After attending the show I learned this trait is widely known, yet the article is silent in this regard.  Why? — QuicksilverT @ 16:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Elizium23 (talk) 20:25, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

text: Lots of comedians can be offensive. That's not really an important point. Wikipedia is not a parent's guide. McLerristarr | Mclay1 16:37, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, offensive is not the problem. It's how awful and tiresome his loathsome prop comedy is .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:6480:B640:CD14:907C:1830:C4EB (talk) 00:04, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offensive 

message: The article needs a brief section regarding him bulking up. DrkBlueXG (talk) 19:24, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physique Transformation
Talk:The Freecycle Network

message: I removed the "Payments to founder" section, copied below. The citations establish, at most, the specific claims of how much Beal gets paid and that his wife is on the board. But there are no citations to establish that either of these things is controversial. (Having salaried workers is extremely normal for a nonprofit, so it would be surprising if that were controversial.) --Amcbride (talk) 00:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "payments to founder" subsection under controversies 

message: Although TFN is primarily run by volunteers, Beal received a salary of $98,352 and "other compensation" of $7,242 in 2020. The board consists of three people; one is Beal's wife, Jennifer Columbus. Amcbride (talk) 00:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Payments to founder
Talk:Roger Christie

message: Non-neutral text:
He became radicalized as he questioned authority and established values.
Sincere and deeply- held beliefs would not let him participate in the killing of others just because he was ordered to, or for any other reason. 
He learned the life changing lesson at 21 years of age that he could face-up to and fight 'city hall'... and win!
----
What was this guy famous for, again? Why does he have an article? Could someone please list verifiable sources for any of this? - David Gerard 03:40, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:GxP

message: Hans,
Thanks for posting this GxP page. I have a suggestion: I would like to add GIP for Good Information Practices to the list. Then we could move and expand your IT discussion to a new GIP page, and expand the General GxP introduction. Disclaimer: I am a volunteer on a project (LSIT) to write and formalize GIP. Jmcneil86043 16:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GIP for IT topics in GxP 

message: Good hospital practice has been added based on the following
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=allintitle:+good+hospital+practice&hl=en&lr=&newwindow=1&start=0&sa=N
--222.67.207.79 (talk) 08:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A topic of .... 

message: * Good pharmacy practice
** http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=GxP&diff=170469848&oldid=164613089
** 
--222.67.215.129 (talk) 02:25, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info about the topic of ..... 

message: GxP is a term used initially for regulated environment to indicate all law and regulations (e.g. Code of Federal Regulation) 
applicable to Pharmaceutical: Good Laboratory/Clinical/Manufacturing/Distribution Practice.
The term should not be applied to guideline or similar documentation issued to standardize a good working practice: 
e.g. GAMP, GIP, GEP, GHP, etc. For that you should specify the specific acronym.
198.28.69.5 (talk) 13:01, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  GxP in regulated environment ..... 
Talk:Hódmezővásárhely

message: I'd like to have one more information: how to pronounce the name of the city? mbork 11:51, 2004 Nov 19 (UTC)
that would be terribly difficult to explain :( it would be good if we could upload sound files with pronunciation, I don't know whether it's possible. (guess it's time for me to learn x-sampa :( Alensha 18:02, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 
Talk:Central Vermont Railway

message: The Central Vermont Railway had a logo symilar to that of the Canadian National Railway
(, but using CV Peter Horn 03:05, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logo 

message: There's very detailed info from the 19th Century but nothing from the 1920s until CN sold the line in 1995. There should be something atleast about dieselization, the GT Corporation or shipping conections. 173.110.59.190 (talk) 01:50, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  70 year gap 

message: Almost none of this material is referenced... 
:Risk Engineer (talk) 16:06, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline Citations????
Talk:Randomness/to do

message: * In Randomness and Religion, the Buddhist position on karma is misrepresented. Specifically, karma means volitional action.  Additionally, karma is not presumed to be the only causal mechanism behind events. Chance is another factor, as is the karma of others. In Buddhism, karma is a being's volitional action which heavily influences that being's future experiences, but it does not determine them completely (as in sowing seeds which may or may not germinate depending on a compound of factors - some volitional, some not). In this regard, the Buddhist position on karma has nothing to do with randomness.  Perhaps this portion of the article should be removed, as I am unaware of Buddhism even taking a position on randomness. See the Wikipedia article Karma in Buddhism for a better explanation. Additionally, the Hindu view was lumped together with the Buddhist view, and I suspect the Hindu view of karma suffers from a similar misrepresentation.
* Present Random number generators in the Communications and Cryptography paragraph? Since I'm not sure how to do it (to give details about Pseudorandom number generators and Hardware random number generators or not...), and the whole article is pretty well written, I don't want to mess with it :-)
* Fix grammar.  No run on sentences allowed!
* In Randomness and Religion, 'Compatibilist' should be reverted to 'Incompatibilist,' no? Ejhumphrey (talk) 01:57, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Issue

message: I have started this cleanup.  I have tried to:
* Eliminate links but failed to do all
* Deleted all entries without articles
To get any further I think we need to delete some of the items that don't have a reference to Issue in the article.  Some of the references are really quite obscure.  Ex nihil (talk) 07:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:MOSDAB]] cleanup 

message: SourceForge.net calls this a Tracker Artifact. But I think this article is a way too narrow one.
: Related to Issue_(computers). A more common article about issue would be great. (Kslotte (talk) 15:39, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computers 

message: In business these terms are needed for better management and it is important to know the difference. Some managers get assigned to a company with a higher education degree and are unable to identify the difference. Issues are to be addressed with time such as legal issues, or issuing a flyer for marketing purpose, or issues between two companies or people. Issues with a product also require some time to discuss with experts and professionals. A problem requires immediate attention and has other approaches such as time and money, quality and quantity, which can be addressed by making a decision with in days, hours, or even minutes. 
A good manager does not get involved with labor in a corporation. A good manager delegates in order to keep focus in the important matters of a company. A manager that gets involved with labor can create problems for his or her self, and the business. Making sure deadlines are met; quality control, increasing revenue, and things of this matter are the manager’s focal point.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.145.28 (talk) 19:15, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue Vs. problem
Talk:Mohelnice

message: Hallo, I've just putted some info about Mohelnice, the city wher I live in :)). Most of info is in Czech languague, when I have some free time, I'll translate it.
marYn
----
I moved the content of the page here. Please include information from this text in the article after:
# it is translated into English;
# you make sure you have the right to use it (the text seems to be copyrighted by the city of Mohelnice, see ); otherwise rewrite the information in your own words.  -- Kpalion 15:33, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Generalized Riemann hypothesis

message: "The case χ(n) = 1 for all n yields the ordinary Riemann hypothesis."
Such a χ is not a Dirichlet character (as there is no positive k s.t. χ(n)=0 whenever gcd(n,k)>1). Or am I missing something? -- EJ 14:40, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Uhh, yes, thanks. Stupid me. -- EJ 12:51, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

message: Any competing hypothesis which shows any alternative to GRH?
Reddwarf2956 (talk) 19:01, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any competing hypothesis? 

message: If GRH is true, then every proper subgroup of the multiplicative group (\mathbb Z/n\mathbb Z)^\times omits a number less than 2(\ln p)^2\,
Seems that 2(\ln p)^2 should be 2(\ln n)^2  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.28.138.163 (talk) 17:04, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.—Emil J. 11:21, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

text: If GRH is true, then every proper subgroup of the multiplicative group (\mathbb Z/n\mathbb Z)^\times omits a number less than 2(ln n)2, as well as a number coprime to n less than 3(ln n)2.
Isn't the second statement a direct consequence of the first? If I find a number less than 2(ln n)2 it will surely be less than 3(ln n)2. So what's the point here? --Jobu0101 (talk) 10:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a mistake?
Talk:Normanby Hall

message: Someone who knows something about this subject needs to copyedit/add. --14:44, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article says that Samantha Cameron grew up in in Normanby Hall, yet also that the family moved out in 1963. Given that she was born in 1971, how could she grow up there? One of the pages must be wrong, but I don't know which. to correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.41.230.121 (talk) 21:32, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samantha Cameron
Talk:Robert Palmer (American writer)

message: Someone noted in a friendly conversation elsewhere at wikipedia that because his full name is Robert Franklin Palmer Jr. this new entry could be named that, but I just want to stress it should not because his professional name and byline was Robert Palmer, same as the British singer shouldn't be listed as Robert Allen Palmer for search purposes and isn't. Just saying this for those who may look at the disambiguation situation in the future, now that I've added this Palmer to wikipedia. I think it's best handled with both men having separate "Robert Palmer" listings the way it currently is; I think the disambiguation looks fine. - Bebop (see history page for link to my user page) 15:01, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: His daughter Augusta Palmer is a filmmaker; she recently made a film The Hand of Fatima about Robert Palmer and the Master Musicians of Jajouka. If anyone goes on to do an article on her, there is a photo of her at :Commons:File:Augusta Palmer 01.jpg. And her film might be good viewing for someone who wants to expand this article. - Jmabel | Talk 00:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Augusta Palmer 
Talk:The Other Side of Heaven

message: I'm not sure which of two categories this article belongs in.  I put it in :Category:Portrayals of Mormons in popular media because it is not an "official" LDS film, though it unquestionably shows Mormons in a favorable light.  But God's Army isn't an "official" church film either, but it is in :Category:Latter Day Saint films, so I guess it is really a judgement call.  Any thoughts? — Frecklefoot | Talk 15:09, Nov 19, 2004 (UTC)
:O'course cat fits (no brainer really ¿no?)--Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden (talk) 22:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: The term true Disney movie is vague.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.226.104.225 (talk) 22:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology
Talk:Battle of Cecora (1620)

message: What is meant by an "ord"? Is it a horde? -- Kpalion 15:24, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The allied force of Polish-Lithuanian commonwealth and Moldavia managed to gather a much larger army, far more than even 20,000. This shall be edited(read William H. Guttenberg History becomes alive(2006 release)
:Please cite numbers for BOTH sides here, with page numbers. Please quote book ISBN. See WP:CITE. Thank you, -- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  16:48, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strength 

message: how about the battles of belgrade 1456, valea alba 1475 and vienna 1529 ??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.6.200.40 (talk) 19:00, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "It was the first great Christian victory against Turks in the land battle..." 

message: the title of this article - battle of Tutora - is an arcane name used by some Ukranian and Romanian historians, the proper name in historiography (Polish, English, German, Ukranian, Belorussian, Lithuanian, Russian, Hungarian etc) is battle(respective languages) of Cecora - so change the name to a correct historical name; Wikipedia editors should stop inventing names for already established historical events.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarioTW (talk • contribs) 18:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NAME
Talk:Santa Fe–Southern Pacific merger

message: Though the article references the color scheme of Kodachrome packaging (in the discussion of the paint scheme for the failed merger), it would be helpful to show an image of the package.  Does anyone have one? --Badger151 (talk) 13:09, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does anyone have a picture of a box of Kodachrome film from this era?
Talk:Sam Phillips

message: According to this blog sam phillips and the remix there was a successful law suit against Phillips following his answer song Bear Cat a response to Hound Dog (song) Does anyone know about this?--Salix (talk): 23:35, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See also  --Salix (talk): 00:05, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have the song, Bear Cat on a record, but noticed when more or less the same stuff appeared on CD the song was not included. Carptrash (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  major copyright lawsuit 

message: included in the lede:
:"the emergence and development of rock and roll and rockabilly as the major form of popular music in the 1950s." \
makes it sound as if rockabilly was one the major forms of popular music in the 1950s.  Which I disagree with.  However before I slash & burn the lede i thought I'd see what your thoughts on the subject might be.  Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 20:24, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  the statement 

message: “Sam Phillips Avenue” is an honorary designation, not the official name of the street. I replaced it with the address of the building, which is well known to fans. Jwicklatz (talk) 21:44, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Sam Phillips Avenue” 

message: Just ran through famous quote, now it came from Ike Turner. Ike Turner said in an interview, that Dewey played their fresh recording (Rocket 88) and white kids began to buy it like crazy, that's when Sam got the idea: "Well, man, if I get me a white boy to sound like a black boy, then I got a gold mine"... (Holger Peterson "Talking Music: Blues Radio and Roots Music", p.156.). -Luboznaykin (talk) 19:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote 

message: Didn't  he play guitar  at Sam Phillips  studio? 24.237.159.220 (talk) 18:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Milton  Breland Stough