Talk:Fuzuli District

message: I removed POV and OR added from armeniapedia.org and armeniahouse.org. Fizuli is occupied raion of Azerbaijan outside of Nagorno-Karabakh. The article is supposed to reflect sourced encyclopedic and neutral material. Please, discuss further changes on talk page. Atabek 00:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Atabek, your source asks nothing about "Fizuli is a raion of Azerbaijan, partially under the military control of Armenian forces". it only asks "Karabakh Armenian forces take Agdam, then push south toward the Iranian border, occupying the Qubatli, Jebrayli, and Fizuli districts" . "Karabakh Armenian" not "Armenian", "Fizuli district" not "raion" (of Karabakh, of Azerbaijan?), nothing about "partially military control". its an original research! Andranikpasha 10:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fizuli is not a district of Nagorno-Karabakh, it is a rayon of Azerbaijan. It is not claimed as a part of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. District, in this case, should be considered synonymous with rayon. --Golbez 10:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

text: "lowland Karabakh" is not a political unit and therefore cannot have districts. In this case, it certainly means the Fizuli rayon of Azerbaijan. I wasn't aware any source disagreed that Armenians (of either type) occupied most of Fizuli. --Golbez 10:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: Hello! Sorry if I'm talking to the wrong person, but I believe that you removed one of the fact boxes that I'd added to the Fizuli page. There was some sort of explanation but I'm afraid I don't really understand it. It seems that for some reason the style of the fact box wasn't right - I'm more than happy to have such boxes right, and simply cut and pasted that style from another part of wikipedia precisely as I thought it should look the same as other similar pages (and I'm not clever enough to make up my own!). However, simply getting rid of the fact box seems too severe as that means that the figures get lost too. Anyway, best wishes.Malikbek (talk) 12:04, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Malikbek! I have nothing against the Fizuli box Im welcoming it! But what is unacceptable that the accusations are so much biased there (f.e. we're affraiding to use the words like occupation etc.) and will be reverted to more neutral version. And an another problem with your first edit was the undiscussed changes at description which was discussed earlier. Andranikpasha (talk) 15:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fizuli Box 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fuzuli District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222054150/http://www.demoscope.ru/weekly/ssp/sng89_reg1.php to http://demoscope.ru/weekly/ssp/sng89_reg1.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fuzuli District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091114093402/http://www.azstat.org/statinfo/demoqraphic/en/2_1.shtml to http://www.azstat.org/statinfo/demoqraphic/en/2_1.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified