lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sex reassignment therapy

message: Checking for copy violations, from (% values are from Earwig's copyvio detector; these do not indicate who copied from whom; that is a separate check):
* meit.info: 51.3%
Mathglot (talk) 05:44, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Uhhh... That meit.info site is a straight-up porn site, but they do indeed seem to copy several sentences of text from the article midway down the page for no apparent reason. I suspect that they plagiarized us rather than the reverse.  Crossroads -talk- 05:13, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for finding that! Mathglot (talk) 07:52, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible COPYVIO
Talk:Kamikaze (Twista album)

message: Someone needs to put info about the re-release of this album... I believe it contained two bonus tracks (Hope remix and So Sexy Part 2) (Rishi B 01:54, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-release

message: It is pretty obvious that this song does, in fact, feature Kanye West in the chorus but the track listing and production notes on the CD do not list him as a feature. Therefore I believe it would be considered original research to list Kanye as a feature here. -- 82.152.218.111 17:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overnight Celebrity
Talk:Peace, Love, Death Metal

message: 'Live at Slims' is listed as a precursor to 'Peace, Love, Death Metal', but this live concert is not mention on the bands official wikipedia entry. Shouldn't we put them in sync with each other? 86.216.236.92 (talk) 13:46, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preceeded by recording 
Talk:Under the Table and Dreaming

message: I noticed that a previous version of this article omitted two of the album's five singles, so I included this information.  I did a pretty mediocre job, however, and I hope somebody with more experience could give those changes a proper formatting.  2600:8805:A901:D100:DC60:175F:621E:5689 (talk) 02:03, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jimi Thing and Typical Situation
Talk:Ronnie Lott

message: Since someone posted this in the Cleanup section, I am in need of some info on what should be added?--Wood162001 11:18, 1 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: They may have been put off by the general lack of capitalization, etc. It's much better now; please see also the note on your talk page. MisfitToys
Clean up the article!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.34.199.34 (talk) 02:31, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If Ronnie Lott brags about cheating on video then I think that is a credible source. --Gbleem 19:53, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  College Cheating 

message: I saw this line in the "Other Facts" section and removed it: "His devastating hit against Ickey Woods was one of the early turning points of Super Bowl XXIII."  I checked the play-by-play, and Lott only tackled Woods twice in that game.  The first was on a 3rd-and-3 play where Woods gained six yards. The second was on a 1st-and-10 play late in the first quarter where Woods was stopped for a 2-yard gain.  Maybe it was a devestating hit, but it's hard to say that this play was a turning point in the game.  The Bengals went on to tie the game and eventually take the lead, and Woods ended up as the game's leading rusher. Anson2995 16:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Bowl XXIII 
Talk:Indestructible Object

message: I'm pretty sure that "Am I Awake?" is the theme song for TLCs, now-defunct show, Resident Life. If I am correct in this, should this be added to the article? --Thaddius 14:16, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just to add, TMBG's website lists making a theme for "Resident Life" as one of the randoms facts about the band: They Might Be Giants have also written and performed theme songs for “The Oblongs,” "Higglytown Heroes," "Resident Life," and ABC’s “Nightline Primetime," as well as songs for “The Simpsons,” "Home Movies," "Dexter's Laboratory" and "Courage the Cowardly Dog." But of course it does not mention which song was used as the theme. --Thaddius 14:21, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Am I Awake?"
Talk:Solace (disambiguation)

message: yes thats true  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.169.166.19 (talk) 20:48, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I always thought 'solace' was a time of peace or something.
/:
--Aaedien 04:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solace's Meaning
Talk:The Empire Strikes First

message: What in the name of Thor is a Sonic Alienator???74.67.228.2 04:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonic Alienator 
Talk:Get Rich or Die Tryin' (disambiguation)

message: Do we need an entry for each and every song?  To my knowledge, only majorly significant songs normally get a individual entry. Donovan Ravenhull 23:21, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  An entry for each song? 
Talk:Cyclorama (album)

message: Can anyone tell me who did the cover of this record? -Freekee 06:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cover aritst

message: 71.3.113.91, why did you remove the extra instruments played by the personnel? (see diff) Is that not verified? I might not have added all that in the first place, but I certainly don't think it's warranted to remove it. -Freekee 05:06, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed instruments

message: At the end of Genki Desu Ka, a second band shows up in the studio, invited by a bogus letter that says they won the chance to be on the album, and Styx lets them perform excerpts from two songs even though the letter was fake.  Does anyone know if that was a scripted gag, or if the incident really occurred, and what the other band is? --205.201.141.146 20:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genki Desu Ka 
Talk:Bernoulli's inequality

message: 1-x<e^(-x)
  Jackzhp 20:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  a little bit more 

message: Bernoulli's inequality true for all real values of r ≥ 1. This is important for many applications, so it is less useful to just describe it for integer values of r. And I do not think that it is worthwhile including an induction proof, which only gives the result for integer values of r.
Here's a quick proof for all real values of r ≥ 1. Unfortunately, I don't have the Wikipedia skills to directly edit this entry, so maybe someone else can do it. 
Let f(x) = (1+x)^r - 1 - rx. The extended mean value theorem says that
f(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x + (1/2)f(y)x^2  
for some y between 0 and x. But f(0) = 0 and f'(0) = 0, so 
f(x) = r(r-1)(1+y)^{r-2}x^2.
for some y between 0 and x. It is clear that this last expression is nonnegative if x > -1 and r ≥ 1.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.41.44 (talk) 14:59, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This entry should be for real values of r, not just for integer values 

message: For some reason this is not mentioned anywhere, but upon trying to prove the inequality I stumbled upon that fact.
It can be easily shown that for even n values the inequality applies for all real x values, and for odd ns, for all x≥−2.
* Maybe it is not mentioned because for non-integer n values - an is meaningless for negative a values (−2≤x<−1).
[Shir Peled]  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.139.226.37 (talk) 18:09, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it should definitely be mentioned in the article that for whole number exponents Bernoulli's inequality holds for x≥−2 - in fact this follows from the inductive proof already given in the article, because what is used there is that x+2 ≥ 0, i.e. x ≥ −2 Joel Brennan (talk) 15:55, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  For ''n'' integer values the inequality also applies for ''x''≥−2 

message: Does anyone know which Bernoulli came up with the inequality, or when?  Will someone please add a history section, links to the proper Bernoulli, and a link to this article from the proper Bernoulli's page?  Thank you.  Yoda of Borg (talk) 04:12, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add History 

message: I don't see how the inequality derived for 0 < \alpha < 1 can be "reversed" outside that domain, because I think convexity is only proved for alpha between 0 and 1.
It's more straightforward to prove f(x) = (1 + x)^n is convex over x >= -1, n >= 1, then by convexity f lies above its tangent line at x=0, 1 + nx. Wqwt (talk) 20:49, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convexity proof
Talk:Throwing Copper

message: Is it necessary to say that "many critics and fans consider" this to be Live's breakthrough album, especially when we go on to cite as evidence the album's commercial success and the success of its singles?  Isn't the commercial success and related exposure of an album something that makes an album a "breakthrough" album, without needing it to be a subjective decision?  Quantitatively it's clear that this was the band's breakthrough album.
:i don't think there is any sort of quantitative definition of a breakthrough album -- it's a subjective judgment of when a band has become successful enough to have broken through to the mainstream. --dan 21:09, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Does anyone know where the title for the Album came from?
I ask because in the native cultures of northwest (as in coastal British Columbia) "throwing copper" was an ultimate insult or challenge in a potlatch."Coppers" were ornately designed shields and symbols of wealth and power. If a chief would "throw his copper" at the feet of another, it would be a challenge. I haven't heard of any other origin of "throwing copper."
jacob
Jwbeaton 18:33, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did the title come from? 

message: The band were having trouble naming the record. They HAD to name it on the day they did, or else it wouldn't have come out when it was supposed to. There was a sports goods store next door to where they were, so Ed and Patrick bought some BB Guns. They were firing them in the back, then came back inside. When asked where they'd been they threw up their arms in a psuedo gangster style and declared "we was throwin' copper". Then Chad Gracey said that should be the name of the record.
They explained all this themselves in their MTV Live Past, Present & Future video.  - Lovemonk. 17:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Throwing Copper Title Explanation

message: I heard there was a dispute regarding who owns the rights to the original masters of these songs, Live or Radioactive. Does anyone have any information about this? CoW mAnX (talk) 23:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Master Rights 

message: This album was played during various murders committed by John Justin Buntin et el (http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/sa/SASC/2003/251.html). Perhaps this constitutes as random trivia?
Regarding the above unsigned comment, the link currently gives a Can't extract contents error, but links to a PDF which can be downloaded.
Here's a story from early in the trial referencing the album:
https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2003-02-26/snowtown-judge-bans-jury-from-hearing-album/1221744
huwg 60.242.74.211 (talk) 05:04, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snowtown murders 

message: Can anyone explain to me why on "All Over You" the word 'over' is capitalized? Why is not "All over You"? 'Over' is a tricky word sometimes regarding song title capitalization.2601:2C2:300:1AC0:693F:2382:A34B:808F (talk) 01:39, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Song title
Talk:Trans-European Transport Network

message: I vote for merging this article with "Trans-European Networks" (TEN), building one bigger site instead of two smaller ones. -- Adwicko (talk) 11:54, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with TEN

message: Trans-European Transport Networks is deliberate; this is the name of the policy framework. Please don't go changing it to Network. --Tagishsimon 13:28, 1 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming - Pluralisation is deliberate

message: What is the relation of Trans-European Transport Networks to Pan-European corridors? Thank you. 130.230.1.90 16:25, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Added to the relevant articles. -- Beland (talk) 15:59, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pan-European corridors 

message: According to a recent video  (min 1:34-1:42) released by the Italian newspaper "La Repubblica", Berlin–Palermo corridor is no longer the Line 1 of Trans-European Transport Networks (TEN-T): "EU commission has redesigned the communication axes substituting the Berlin-Palermo corridor with Helsinki-Valletta".
The 9th of September 2011 Italian Transports Minister Altero Matteoli has sent a letter to EU Commission Vice President Siim Kallas asking for the inclusion of the corridor Berlin-Palermo into the Helsinki-Valletta [from the Italian Infrastructures and Transports official web site]
See also:
* Italian fury at European Commission's plan to ‘divert’ bridge funds to Malta
* Italians rage as Commission prefers Helsinki–Valletta route to bridge over the Straits of Messina
Krige (talk) 15:30, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line 1 Berlin-Palermo substituted by the corridor Helsinki-Valletta 

message: Why is the name of the article pluralized? Although Trans-European Transport Networks is indeed used to some extent, the singular version Trans-European Transport Network seems to be the one used in official contexts, see for instance decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network and the website of the European Commission. There is also a committee related to TEN-T with the name Committee on the Trans-European Transport Network, without any s. Therefore I find it very surprising that this Wikipedia article uses a plural form. Any reason? --Glentamara (talk) 07:09, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official name 

message: The main map displayed is devoid of any geographical accuracy, sacrificing this for random curves.
Whilst useful to simplify routes this is simply misleading and doesn’t add much
Would be very useful to replace this with a simplified accurate map highlighting the network AlbusWulfricDumbledore (talk) 10:48, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacking + inaccurate map
Talk:Birds of Pray

message: Perhaps we should junk the link to the RS review and replace it with maybe the AMG one? The RS one is a horrible review. It had no justification of the rating of 2/5. Nothing negative to say, nothing positive. Useless. Paulmer2003 (talk) 03:16, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Putting Rolling Stone reviews in articles has proved a waste of time as all the links are dead now! I think you might have to be a subscriber to see them. So the AMG one is going in! Iangurteen (talk) 16:31, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, someone had beaten me to it with the AMG review, so I've deleted the RS review and put in one I found at Shaking Through (Not very favourable but at least it justifies it's mark!) Iangurteen (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling Stone review 
Talk:Like (preposition)

message: Like (preposition) recently survived vfd. See: Talk:Like (preposition)/Delete -- Wile E. Heresiarch 07:51, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I cant see how a dictionary definition can become an article. If you have an idea, please edit the article accordingly. For now i move the notice from Wikipedia:Speedy deletions to Wikipedia:Votes for deletion, so others can add their comments. -- Chris 73 | (New) Talk 14:19, 1 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Move to VfD completed. -- Chris 73 | (New) Talk 14:32, 1 May 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Christchurch (disambiguation)

message: I moved this to Christchurch (disambiguation) from Christchurch, and moved Christchurch, New Zealand to Christchurch. My reasoning is that the Christchurch in New Zealand is by far the more common use of the name, and it is standard in Wikipedia to use the most common name as the main page. I wanted to get this done as soon as possible because the number of links in New Zealand articles is increasing rapidly. I have done the same thing with Dunedin, but have deliberately avoided doing this for Nelson and Napier, where usage is more ambiguous. Ben Arnold 14:24, 1 May 2004 (UTC)

message: I've included the old New Zealand electorate of Christchurch on this page. This is important, as City of Christchurch redirects to the electorate, but this is conceivably a search term for the city itself. Schwede66 01:08, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christchurch (New Zealand electorate)
Talk:Grândola, Vila Morena

message: The municipality of Grandola has a web page with the lyrics and music of this song: Official site
I've updated the above link to a 'live' one. Peter Ells (talk) 21:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music and lyrics on-line 

message: Morena, in the Portuguese Language, means Brunet or Sun-Tanned not Moor! Even if the its origin is a Castilian word that originaly meant Moor (but no more even in modern Spanish). Nobody in Portugal associates Morena with the Moors. I'm changing the translation. The Ogre 14:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morena 

message: The French, Spanish and Portuguese versions of this article appear to say that the song was banned, while the English-language version says it wasn't.  Loads of websites say it was, but obviously that doesn't prove anything...  It could just be a popular misconception.  However, the current article doesn't prove anything either: it has no citation (admittedly nor do the sources that say it was banned) and besides, the fact that it was performed live doesn't show that it wasn't banned from the radio (and maybe it doesn't even show that it wasn't banned, depending how strictly such bans were enforced at that time).  Clearly more research will be needed, then, to get to the bottom of this matter. 86.153.135.48 (talk) 20:45, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Banned?

message: I'm wondering if a section could/should be added to discuss it's use in popular media? (As referenced in the wiki) it is used as a common refrain throughout the hit Netflix series Money Heist (a reworking of the Spanish series 'Casa de papel') . I'm not sure if it appears in other media, but given it's significance as a pro-revolution and anti-fascist work, I would imagine it has been used a good bit. Saxygator (talk) 10:20, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  inclusion in media?
Talk:Integrase

message: Hello,
Is there a specific DNA sequence where integrase works? Is the viral DNA capable to enter in any site of human genome?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.242.44.250 (talk) 23:14, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea, but a good place to take these questions might be Wikipedia:Reference Desk.  Yours, Meelar 14:59, 1 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does it work? 

message: Integrons also use integrase to pick up bacterial genes/casettes of genes and recombine them in other situations eg. in plasmids/genomes.  Are integrons considered viruses?  I would suggest that the field considers integrons as mobile elements in prokaryotic genomes which contribute significantly to their evolution.  There's a good review of integrons here : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7783631?dopt=Abstract I may do something to this page myself if I have time after revision pet (talk) 00:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integrons using integrase 

message: The last paragraph says, "Elucidation of the HIV-1 integrase structure has been unsuccessful despite numerous efforts.".  However, casually searching the Protein Databank ([www.pdb.org]), I found:
*HIV INTEGRASE CORE DOMAIN COMPLEXED WITH TETRAPHENYL ARSONIUM (1HYV, 2001)
*HIV integrase (3LPT, 2010)
*HIV integrase (3LPU, 2010)
Is this technically correct? --InsufficientData (talk) 01:49, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I skimmed the Nature article.  I think the article makes the point that the so-called "intasome" hasn't been solved (the integrase + all the helper proteins it uses to perform its splicing activity).  I'm unsure if the the PDB structures I referenced include the full conformation given all helper enzymes.  There could in theory be an active site change with and without the helper proteins which is significant.  --InsufficientData (talk) 02:07, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Protein Databank and Last Paragraph
Talk:Industrial sociology

message: This is all Wikipedia has on this gigantic topic? Didn't anybody here take a sociology 101 class in college? Trickrick1985 (talk) 22:38, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't agree more. The sociological study of work emerged during the era of industrialisation in Europe, and for as long as bureaucracy was the central fascination of the study of work, industrial sociology and sociology of work were roughly synonymous. For the last few decades, however, sociological studies of work have been more concerned with post-bureaucracy (e.g. Hochschild's The Managead Heart), pre-bureaucracy (e.g. as in the historical studies mentioned above), and the organisation of work in societies that are transitioning directly from agrarian to the post-industrial information age (e.g. studies of the use of mobile banking services among farmers in Kenya). So, I'm seconding LAC's opinion and if no one else objects I'll change the article to Sociology of Work when I get around to it. I also updated the heading for this section to reflect the name change proposal.Isaac.holeman (talk) 16:57, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to change page name to Sociology of Work
Talk:Race (human categorization)/Archive 10

message: :Here the problem arises of distinguishing black Africans as a racial group; it doesn't work because it is a paraphyletic classification -- that is, to take black Africans as a racial group, the group by definition includes every living person on Earth because everyone is descended from this group.
[P0M:] Strictly speaking, everyone is descended from the same ancestors, but wouldn't a correct cladogram show a branching at 120000 B.C. (or whatever the approximate date really is) with the several African groups continuing to evolve away from their original genetic constitution(s) during the same time span that the groups that migrated out of Africa evolved to adapt to new environments? 
[P0M:] Does anybody own the knowledge on which these cladograms are made? Why can't we just draw our own diagram? P0M 17:48, 30 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Follow-through, section on Phylogenetic representations 

message: A new contributor, Arnejohs, altered the third paragraph substantially, as well as making many changes that I think are useful. I have always been a little queasy about the word "categorical" in the paragraph 3 that was there before, but I put the whole paragraph back because in my experience having that information there will head off misunderstandings and turbulence. P0M 21:11, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Patrick0Moran for correcting the error I entered. I am sorry, but my intension was not at all to remove the lines of the third paragraph. Actually I wanted to delete last sentence in the second paragraph. How I managed to mess it up don?t know. My intension was also to put down some arguments at the discussion page. Therefore I appreciate your invitation to do so. I felt that parts of the introductory words of this article were an inconsistent with the content of other wiki articles. Human race redirects to Human where the last sentence in the first paragraphs says "There is only one extant subspecies, H. sapiens sapiens; that is, all humans alive today belong to this one subspecies." If the term race should be used in biological science it should (according to what is said here to) be equivalent to subspecies. It is important to note that race also is used in the more defendable interpretation as social construct, - also by biologists. If this social construct is geographically defined, the term population is mostly used. Arnejohs 00:16, 18 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post Tax Day Changes
Talk:The Desert Song

message: The bulk of this article is fine, and there is no need for it to be moved or deleted - I have replaced it, minus the lyrics which some people felt were a copyright violation. If you want to play around with the lyrics, you can do so at The Desert Song/Temp.  If you just want to edit the article, you can do so in the normal way. Deb 16:15, 1 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled