lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Category talk:Dungeons & Dragons deities

message: Just because the d20 System Reference Document 3.5 says much of it can be reprinted or whatever in its license, doesn't mean Wikipedia should have the entire SRD in detail. I have only marked this one for deletion, but as I learn how and find more I will also marked them. Every last detail of the game is not required on Wikipedia.
I don't think Wikipedia was intended to reproduce as much game content as appears on D&D. Could the articles in this category by combined and not try to reproduce the SRD where available? shadzar|Talk|contribs 16:55, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: SRD

message: Why are demon lords and archdevils listed in this category? They're powerful and have worshippers, but they aren't deities as defined in-game.--24.255.171.220 (talk) 14:50, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fiends
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cyprus

message: In Cyprus, Geography of Cyprus, and List of countries and dependencies by area, Republic of Cyprus' area is given as 9251 km2 and it's stated that value includes Northern Cypriot and the sovereign British bases' areas. I'm not objection to including Northern Cypriot area, but why do they include the sovereign British areas? Should those be subtracted from them? Or does Cyprus claim them and not recognize them as sovereign British land? Betseg (talk) 11:51, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: hi, I saw your message above, pinging so that someone sees this. Betseg (talk) 11:54, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Area of Cyprus 

message: Does Ethiopian Airlines Flight 409 need to be on the "In the news" section for Cyprus? Its got almost nothing to do with Cyprus other than the fact that Cyprus Police Aviation helped in the search and rescue. Maybe in the "see also" section of Cyprus Police Aviation Unit seen as thats the glue here, the crash in and of itself happened in Lebanese waters and was an international flight with nothing to do with Cyprus. SirBlueWhite (talk) 19:11, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethiopian Flight 409 

message: There are edits being made to include the flag of the unrecognised Turkish Republic of North Cyprus onto the Flag of Cyprus page. 
There is a separate article for this flag and the inclusion of the content is being disputed. Can we please get a third opinion for whether this should be included or if information pertaining to the TRNC flag should remain within its own article 86.18.83.46 (talk) 14:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag of Cyprus page 

message: Hello WikiProject Cyprus: 
WikiProject Women in Green is holding a  month-long Good Article Edit-a-thon event in October 2023!
Running from October 1 to 31, 2023, WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) is hosting a Good Article (GA) edit-a-thon event with the theme Around the World in 31 Days! All experience levels welcome. Never worked on a GA project before? We'll teach you how to get started. Or maybe you're an old hand at GAs – we'd love to have you involved! Participants are invited to work on nominating and/or reviewing GA submissions related to women and women's works (e.g., books, films) during the event period. We hope to collectively cover article subjects from at least 31 countries (or broader international articles) by month's end. GA resources and one-on-one support will be provided by experienced GA editors, and participants will have the opportunity to earn a special WiG barnstar for their efforts. 
We hope to see you there!
Grnrchst (talk) 12:55, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Green's 5th Edit-a-thon
Talk:Why We Fight (Band of Brothers)

message: I’m removing these two sentences from the plot section:
:The beginning of this episode starts with a string quartet. We do not question its necessity until the end of the episode.
:The episode concludes with the string quartet, composed of Jews, nodding to one another and agreeing to end the despondent tune.
These sentences are disconnected from the rest of the section, and their relevance is never explained.  They also seem to imply some sort of POV – the use of first person in the article is out of place and there’s a lot of personal interpretation to conclude what the musicians agreed to and the character of the tune.
If somebody finds this stuff relevant to a two-paragraph plot summary, and can word it better, please put it back. Jaksmata 21:55, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  String Quartet 

message: The section of the article that says that one of the violin players looks like William Petersen is just silly. It would be valid if it actually was the actor from CSI but it is not. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.124.149.126 (talk) 15:43, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSI Reference
Talk:Morris Lapidus

message: only a few of his projects are on the list. please add if you know of othersBrandlandUSA 17:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "This article reads more like a story than an encyclopedia entry. To meet Wikipedia's quality standards and conform to the neutral point of view policy, please help to introduce a more formal style and remove any personally invested tone. (August 2018)" 
" 'I look forward with the utmost eagerness to reading your account; many of the people here who supported us last time will be enchanted.'
'Dear Joseph, how kind of you to say so. You will put it into the proper Whitehall prose, scabrous, flat-footed, with much use of the passive, will you not? I may have allowed something approaching enthusiasm to creep in.' "  — Patrick O'Brian, The Yellow Admiral
Scutigera (talk) 02:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested modification of tone
Talk:Invercargill Airport

message: Have made small changes today to correct numerous spelling/grammatical errors & correct some factual errors. Article could use a rewrite & references. JimmahSky (talk) 20:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: Are there any sources someone can add to the Today section? This section lacks citations.--Anderson - What's up? 06:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Today 

message: I would like to point out that there are international  stopovers in Invercargill during winter. The term Technical doesn't mean it's an international service.. Best,--Anderson - What's up? 00:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the "International Technical Stopover" section adequately covers the "technical"  information. I can't see how Air NZ international can possibly fit within a section entitled "Scheduled and Regular Charter Routes".Those Air NZ flights are neither scheduled nor regular . My 2c. Moriori (talk) 02:31, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  International technical stopover 

message: Some months ago I deleted the referenced but verbatim detailed technical information relating to the airport.  This  information has been re-added. I have checked other NZ airport entries and only Chatham island and Tauranga(in less comprehensive form) have any such "operational information".  The edit summary of the revert says suggests that the information is useful and that it has always been there.  "Useful" is questionable how useful is this for Wikipedia?  "Always" is not an argument.  I suspect it would be much better to provide a link to the official airways information - rather than needing to keep this copied information up-to-date.  Wikipedia is not the place people should be getting such critical information.Andrewgprout (talk) 21:48, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct; Wikipedia is not the place to collect such information (not least because it is likely to end up being wrong when it most needs to be right). If I see it appear here again, I will remove it; and you and others should do so too. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 05:03, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operational Information 

message: I reverted a statement added without references to this effect with the example of Timaru.  This was reverted back with the reason Timaru is not a city.  This is a questionable point but I think I concur with a note on the Timaru page.  I think it is safest to not say anything here or at least reword the statement to account for the possible ambiguity.
:"Timaru (28,400) once had a city council, but is now administered by a district council. It is classified as a secondary urban area by Statistics New Zealand. It is still considered a city and the principal centre of South Canterbury. Road signs state "city centre" rather than "town centre"."   Andrewgprout (talk) 06:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  :-)  Thanks  Andrewgprout (talk) 00:58, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only city in NZ without a nonstop air link to Auckland ?
Talk:Ioannina National Airport

message: My wife (who comes from Konitsa and is now there) has heard from several sources that the airport will become international. Which means that both the contents and the title of this page will have to change, in due time. --Onno Zweers 13:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Benazir Bhutto International Airport

message: The History section belongs to the New Islamabad International Airport and not to the current airport. This section is repeated as such on New Islamabad International Airport as well, so i think it should be removed from here. Yasirniazkhan (talk) 13:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong History 

message: This airport will close on the 18th of April,2018 but the attached Airbase PAF Base Nur Khan will remain operational,so if any major updates happen after the closure please put them on the article of the airbase instead of the one of the now defunct airport  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CaptainHK (talk • contribs) 04:04, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closure
Talk:Islay Airport

message: What was the WWII RAF Station called; RAF Islay? Hugo999 (talk) 20:18, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of RAF station 
Talk:Ixtapa-Zihuatanejo International Airport

message: Does UA even serve t his airport anymore? I don't see it on any timetables.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.158.161.102 (talk) 21:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  United 
Talk:Jaipur International Airport

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Vikings

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.   B2T2 17:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 21:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Day Awards 

message: Seeing as this project seems to be inactive, would there be any objections to merging it into the Nordic military history task force of the Military history WikiProject?  This would allow any future activity to use the umbrella WikiProject's fairly well-developed infrastructure. Kirill 01:36, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As there have been no objections, I've gone ahead and merged the project. Kirill 19:34, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging into a MILHIST task force?
Talk:Jerez Airport

message: What does the following piece of advertisement have to do with Jerez airport? "In the entrance road to Jerez Airport is a large upper class adult venue which opens from 5pm to 5am daily. Vaji 96"
190.161.115.240 (talk) 22:59, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Archaeological record

message: * http://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?as_q=archaeological+nomenclature&num=10&btnG=Search+Scholar&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_occt=title&as_sauthors=&as_publication=&as_ylo=&as_yhi=&as_sdt=1.&as_sdtp=on&as_sdts=5&hl=en
--222.67.216.199 (talk) 04:56, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info about ''Nomenclature...'' section..... 

message: Because this article has gone without references for so long it risked deletion, I have stripped it back to just a basic definition supported by sources. It should be expanded to re-incorporate some of the stuff that was there about what kind of things make up the archaeological record (artefacts, biofacts, etc.) but this time with more detail and, of course, references. There is probably also a section on different theoretical views of the nature of the archaeological record, which the Patrik article discusses (as of 1985 - there would have to be a more up-to-date source used too). But writing a section like that in a jargon-free and understandable way is far beyond my ability... —Joseph RoeTk•Cb, 19:55, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lots of material removed

message: Understanding the Archaeological Record by Gavin Lucas looks like a good resource for fleshing out this article – the book is structured around "three ways of understanding the archaeological record". It's on Google Books, but if anyone comes across a vital missing passage I have access to the ebook version and could email you a copy (chapter by chapter). Joe Roe (talk) 12:56, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:João Paulo II Airport

message: Well, it's a bit of a conundrum.
Neither the airports own website, nor the Portuguese AIP call it Joao Paulo.
They both simply call it Ponta Delgada.
Using a Google search, Ponta Delgada also has more hits.
SO, which one is it? Chaosdruid (talk) 21:27, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's in a name
Talk:Harbinger (D&D)

message: Star Wars has nothing to do with D&D and that line should not be in an article about D&D but with another Star Wars article related to Harbinger. shadzar|Talk|contribs 17:28, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Star Wars information is already contained in the article on Star Wars ships, found on the disambiguation page for Harbinger.  As such, I didn't see any need not to just remove the information and the  template and have done so. --Suttkus 19:53, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  split
Talk:Helenus of Troy

message: In this article it is stated that Helenus is caught after vying against his brother for Helen after Paris has died, then under torture tells the fall of Troy, one of the requisites being Philoctetes involvement. So due to this Odysseus returns to the marooned Philoctetes, takes him to Troy where he shoots Heracles' Bow and kills Paris.
My problem is, how does Philoctetes kill Paris if he got brought to Troy due to a prophecy from Helenus which only occurred due to him being captured, which in turn occurred from Helenus vying for Helen AFTER Paris died?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.114.208 (talk) 00:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with Helenus's Prophecy occuring after the Death of Paris, input greatly appreciated. 

message: It s Trojans vs Achaeans. Both greek. 2A02:3100:11A8:E400:4997:BAFA:E11D:BC8D (talk) 13:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek civil war
Talk:Jorhat Airport

message: Despite giving factual evidence of Jorhat Airport's rank in Assam, someone deliberately keeps editing it as the 2nd major airport behind Guwahati Airport. Jorhat Airport currently ranks 4th, behind Guwahati, Dibrugarh, and Silchar. Whoever thinks otherwise can just refer to the number of airlines serving the airport, without even digging deep into air traffic data. With the departure of Jet Airways following its billion-dollar plus debt, only IndiGo serves Jorhat. Dibrugarh Airport, on the other hand, is served by IndiGo, SpiceJet, Air Vistara (started operations in April 2019), and Air India. Agreed that Jorhat is a bigger city than Dibrugarh and has a faster growth rate, but that doesn't mean that Dibrugarh can't have a bigger and better airport. It's just a matter of geographical convenience. Dibrugarh serves its neighbours Tinsukia, Sivasagar, Jorhat to some extent, and almost the entire upper reaches of Arunachal Pradesh. Hence, it is but logical that the Airports Authority of India has made significant investments in Dibrugarh rather than in Jorhat. Whoever that complexed person is, please refrain from doing mindless edits on this page. For the sake of facts, can you not stoke up petty rivalry? UdeeptaP (talk) 21:38, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jorhat Airport wiki page 
Talk:José Martí International Airport

message: I have started a discussion at WT:AIRPORT regarding this. Please discuss there. 97.85.113.113 (talk) 02:45, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air China 

message: Haven't the charters flights from LA stopped ? And many of the others will stop once AA and JetBlue starts their own flights. -- Beardo (talk) 04:29, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charters from the US 
Talk:Mack Robinson (athlete)

message: I considered mentioning that he was talked about an an episode of Sports Night, but I don't know if that's proper.--T. Anthony 17:54, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dialectic process vs. dialogic process

message: May I please unlink or disambiguate the link relativistic in the article? - Neparis (talk) 23:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems nobody else is here or watching this article, so I have unlinked it. If you re-link, please disambiguate your link. Thanks. - Neparis (talk) 18:24, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Relativistic"
Talk:Cabin boy

message: To my knowledge, Cabin Boy is not a current position.  Unless anyone believes otherwise, I will move to Maritime History instead of Marine Occupations. Pesco 17:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter, current or not. It is the name of an occupation, but, as you say,  of  "Defunct occupations" `'mikkanarxi 18:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, although I was trying to edit :Category:Marine occupations to be modern.  Any good way to differentiate modern occupations vs historical ones, so both don't come up when someone's looking for modern career information? Pesco 20:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the term cabin boy was the correct male version of 
"stewardess" whereas today they're "flight attendants". Cutelyaware (talk) 05:46, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The article says "not necessarily a minor" but what is the oldest recorded age?--Jack Upland (talk) 07:58, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: Under the heading "Popular culture", one entry is "Renaissance Festival, The Cabin Boys, Pirate Fire Comedy act from Minnesota". The link just resolves to the Wiki on Renaissance Fairs. Sorry, Cabin Boys, but I doubt very much that you meet WP:N.  Unless one can provide compelling evidence for their retention, I'm going to remove that listing. Bricology (talk) 00:13, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-notable group listed; will be removed 

message: The admirals listed in the article were "captain's servants" and not cabin boys. 
"When one reads of a distinguished naval officer having been "a captain's servant," it does not mean that he blacked the captain's boots, mixed his grog, and emptied his slops, but that he entered the service under a captain's protection. Nelson was a "captain's servant" to Captain Maurice Suckling on the guard ship at Chatham, but he was very far from being Captain Suckling's flunkey. The system was bad, and much abused, but it lingered until 1794, when it was abolished [...]." (John Masefield, Sea life in Nelson's times, 1905) Captain's servants were "aspirants", would-be midshipmen. שמחה (talk) 03:43, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cabin boy vs Captain's servant
Talk:Steelworker

message: I think this redirect is USA-centric.  Steelworking is a job held by people worldwide, and in the US for at least 70 years prior to the formation of the USW itself.  I think a short article on what a steelworker does, how many there are world-wide, etc, with links to the Steel and USW articles would be more appropriate.   What do you think? Tomcool 17:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2001 insurgency in Macedonia

message: According to whar i collected: 1. civilians casulties:60 albanians (killed), 10 macedonians (killed), 13 mkd (missing), 6 alb (missing), 1 bulgarian (missing). 
2. Soldier casulties: 86 albanians (killed), 75 macedonians (killed).
3. Other casulties: 2 EU monitors slovak and Norwegian (killed), 1 NATO UK soldier (killed), 1 albanian translator (killed)
Total: 255 people killed. 77.29.180.88 (talk) 14:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casulties without agenda push 

message: Shouldn't it say "counter-clockwise" given the order of photos in the description? Gorgedweller (talk) 17:24, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description of the picture