Talk:Treaty of The Hague

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
:Treaty of Den Haag → :Treaty of The Hague — Per WP:USEENGLISH and WP:COMMONNAME.  See citations and external links at individual treaty articles for examples. —   AjaxSmack   06:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as nominator. —   AjaxSmack   06:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: No Dutch(-speaking) person would ever argue about that. Most Dutch speakers find it fascinating that English has these own spellings. The Dutch wikipedia even has a section on the hagues name in other language, so no need to worrt about.Rex 17:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: Someone must think it's the correct English spelling, or we wouldn't have the article names we do. Agree about the Dutch attitude to variant spellings (although perhaps it's not quite so universal as you suggest). It's an interesting contrast to the French attutude: There seems to be no way that French speakers can comfortably pronounce my surname Alder, because they are used to strictly phonetic pronunciation and to French phonology, and it just doesn't fit these patterns. Andrewa 21:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But who is this someone? Not even all Dutch people are aware it's 'the hague', let alone foreigners.09:41, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We could find out from the article histories if you're curious, but it's curiousity value only. Similarly, it's not terribly relevant whether Dutch speakers know the English name, what we are after here is the best name for the article in English. No change of vote. Andrewa 20:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 10:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as nominator. —   AjaxSmack   06:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: No Dutch(-speaking) person would ever argue about that. Most Dutch speakers find it fascinating that English has these own spellings. The Dutch wikipedia even has a section on the hagues name in other language, so no need to worrt about.Rex 17:54, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: Someone must think it's the correct English spelling, or we wouldn't have the article names we do. Agree about the Dutch attitude to variant spellings (although perhaps it's not quite so universal as you suggest). It's an interesting contrast to the French attutude: There seems to be no way that French speakers can comfortably pronounce my surname Alder, because they are used to strictly phonetic pronunciation and to French phonology, and it just doesn't fit these patterns. Andrewa 21:45, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But who is this someone? Not even all Dutch people are aware it's 'the hague', let alone foreigners.09:41, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We could find out from the article histories if you're curious, but it's curiousity value only. Similarly, it's not terribly relevant whether Dutch speakers know the English name, what we are after here is the best name for the article in English. No change of vote. Andrewa 20:47, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.</div>
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 10:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey