Talk:Princess Märtha of Sweden

message: This page should be named  Crown Princess Märtha of Norway or simply Märtha of Norway as she in fact was Norway's crown princess from 1929 to 1954. Both the Norwegian and the Swedish page about her are named "Märtha av Norge" (Märtha of Norway). Eessppeennrr (talk) 21:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Who is the busybody who has titled this article as "Märtha Louise"???
She was known as Märtha. The fact that her granddaughter is Märtha Louise, should not lead to assimilating procedure, whereby grandmother posthumously gets the identical name.
One further point: I fail to see the relevance of Empress Josephine de Beauharnais here. What is the reason of her being highlighted in bio of Märtha, her great-great-great-great-granddaughter and great-great-great-granddaughter???? They are not namesakes. She did apparently not inherit anything remarkable from her.
Josephine died almost a century before Märtha was born.... 62.78.121.189 11:59, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This (now Princess Märtha Louise of Sweden) should be renamed as Märtha of Sweden 217.140.193.123 01:36, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move per vote *and* NC. —Nightstallion (?) 10:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: *Support Although I would have just asked an administrator, citing the conventions. Charles 15:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Comment Inge, royals on Wikipedia are usually titled under the highest title they held in their own right. It is not unknown to females, however. (Victoria, Princess Royal rather than of the UK or Victoria, German Empress plus variants) Charles 02:39, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Image:Time-magazine-cover-scandanavian-royalty-marries-1929.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:49, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Time-magazine-cover-scandanavian-royalty-marries-1929.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Princess Märtha of Sweden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080408171814/http://www.kongehuset.no/c27309/artikkel/vis.html?tid=29274 to http://www.kongehuset.no/c27309/artikkel/vis.html?tid=29274
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:08, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: External links modified

message: I fail to understand how "fans" could be trying to "promote" a princess who has been dead since the 1950s. The templates are inappropriately worded. I will remove them again unless they are replaced by something reasoable, less ridiculous. If more citations are needed, so be it - add that template then! Märtha was (perhaps unreasonably?) adored, almost worshipped, by the Norwegians (like her sister was by the Belgians). That should be part of the article, but of course well sourced. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:00, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this proposal. -- Picapica (talk) 22:01, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Inappropriate template boxes added to top of article

message: Should we categorise her among "Mistresses of US presidents"? PatGallacher (talk) 21:44, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on TV fiction? I think not. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 21:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistress

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: Did she die of cancer or liver failure due to contracting hepatitis during surgery after WWII? The Wikipedia article says cancer, yet I've read liver failure in two other places. Or, did she have both? 2600:1700:BC01:9B0:141E:D2CC:6CC9:55FF (talk) 22:05, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of Death 

message: I don't think this 'see also' makes much sense. The link redirects to Bethesa, Maryland, and this single sentence is all that's relevant to Märtha: "Merle Thorpe's mansion "Pook's Hill" (1927, razed 1948) became the home-in-exile of the Norwegian Royal Family during World War II." The name of the link is misleading. I think this 'see also' should be removed, unless someone wants to make an article for Pook's Hill or Merle Thorpe. Tttttarleton (talk) 13:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . --SergeWoodzing (talk) 13:40, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! :) Tttttarleton (talk) 12:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  See Also: Pook's Hill