Talk:Taksin

message: Interesting how the current Prime Minister of Thailand and King Taksin have the same English spelling, their actions are quite similar also
: The Thai names and pronunciations are totally different though ตากสิน and ทักษิณ The problem is from Royal Thai General System of Transcription - Manop
Taksin and Thaksin are obviously different. --Paul C 12:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is there a Chinese name here also ?- Manop
:Because it's Taksin's Chinese name. Markyour words 23:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And because he is semi-Chinese origin.--Jerrychen0067 07:03, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese name 

message: His Thai name means Treasure of Tak. Pawyilee 15:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as mentioned in the article, the name derived from his holding the title of Phraya Tak and his birth name being Sin. Paul_012 (talk) 19:53, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone added, Thai name Sin, meaning "money or property", though further down it still says treasure. Should this be reconciled? Pawyilee (talk) 01:37, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Thai name

message: On further investigation, I see that more content in the article is a copyright infringement of this. WP:NFC allows duplication of previously published sources that are not public domain or licensed compatibly with GFDL only under limited circumstances; in no case is extensive quotation permitted. There are basically several options for proceeding from this point:
*We can identity the earliest point of infringement and restore the version that existed prior to that. Improvements utilized after can be incorporated as long as they do not involve the infringing text.
*Contributors to the article can revise the infringing sections completely, from scratch, in the temporary space linked at the article's talk page. This material would be merged after it is finished if it does not infringe on the copyright of that external site or plagiarize from it. (Please note that to avoid infringement, it would have to be rewritten from scratch. Changing a few words will not serve to clear the matter under US copyright law, which forbids extensive close paraphrasing.)
*Interested contributors might choose to contact the webmaster to obtain permission to use the text, if he or she is willing to grant it, according to the process at Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. Please note that permission must meet our requirements; if the webmaster were willing, for instance, to release it for Wikipedia only, we could not use it. It must be released under GFDL or into public domain, and the permission must issue from an address that is obviously connected to the source. Of course, if the webmaster has already given permission, following through with verifying that will allow us to restore this text.
I have blanked the article according to the procedure at Wikipedia:Copyright Problems. If contributors to the article do not specify what handling would suit the material best, I will default after the standard one week listing to removing the infringing material as I did with that previously identified. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional copyright concerns, processes for addressing

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:44, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from these URLs: http://www.wangdermpalace.com/kingtaksin/eng_multifarious.html and http://www.wangdermpalace.com/kingtaksin/eng_militaryact.html as well as other subpages at that site. Infringing material has been replaced by earlier text and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:41, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: They cannot all be "Crown Princes" surely?  Only the oldest one in direct line as heir apparent is normally called that.  All the rest can, in principle, be bumped out of line and are only heir presumptives. SpinningSpark 02:03, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children 

message: The section tells about Nithi's mention that there was a coup that threw Taksin from the throne, but there is nothing more than that. It should mention about how, when, and why too. (with references) --ThHorus (talk) 18:25, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Critics over the coup" suggestion 

message: The section tells about Nithi's mention that there was a coup that threw Taksin from the throne, but there is nothing more than that. It should mention about how, when, and why too. (with references) --ThHorus (talk) 18:27, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Critics over the coup" suggestion 

message: * The tone of Wars and rebellions is clearly biased. Phrases like "Needless to say" "It would be no exaggeration to say that he could have massacred all of them" In fact, the whole passage is taken from "Damrong Rajanubhab's accounts" who is a Thai citizen. Sources need to be neutral like modern academic studies, etc. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources 
* Azaewunky is based on Thai account. Use true name , Maha Thiha Thura instead.
* "The successes against competitors for power were due to Taksin's fighting ability as a warrior, splendid leadership, exemplary valor and effective organization of his forces."
" splendid, exemplary, effective" all eulogistic words in one sentence. Please try to be neutral. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(words_to_watch). 
Soewinhan (talk) 04:28, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: I notice there are major differences between the Taksin entry and the portion in the History of Thailand section pertaining to Taksin.  I made a simple edit but someone with more familiarity might want to give it a shot.  The History of Thailand page is an important page - the Taksin part has a lot of mythology and bias woven into the entry TotoroRules (talk) 02:19, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Taksin vs. History of Thailand Entry 

message: The article gives conflicting info about his death date.
A part of the article says he died on 6 April. Another part says it was 7 April. Another part says 10 April.
But the correct one is 10 April, as calculated by the Fine Arts Department of Thailand.
Historical documents say he died on Wednesday, the 13th waning-moon day of the 5th month of the year 1143 LE, the Year of the Tiger, which corresponds to Wednesday, 10 April 2325 BE (1782 CE).Fine Arts Department of Thailand. (1999). Golden Jubilee Collection of Historical Archives, Volume 1 (in Thai). Bangkok: Fine Arts Department. . p. 21.
--iudexvivorum (talk) 08:52, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date 

message: I thought that since this dealt with Thai history, that the dates in this article used to be in dmy format? Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 22:42, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: While DMY is the date format used in Thailand, and most Wikipedia articles about Thailand do follow it, this isn't required by Wikipedia guidelines. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Strong national ties to a topic only covers English-speaking countries. The general guidance is that an article's existing date format should be retained unless there is consensus to change it. You could suggest a change for this article (personally, I'd also prefer DMY), but please ping the major contributors and allow time for a full discussion. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:35, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  mdy format? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:52, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion