Talk:T-95

message: Evidently the article, as Maury seems to have stated, is refering to another tank, the so called "Obiekt 195". I think this must be changed, I have allowed myself to make some changes to the article if the editors don't mind. ~  ~  ~  ~  ZealotKommunizma
This is the original tex which I have changed for the present one:
The T-94 or T-95 is a prototype main battle tank, currently in development in the Russian Federation. Most information about this tank is speculative. The tank is said to be of a novel design, with a very large smooth bore tank gun of approximately 152 mm calibre, in a remotely-controlled mount. Such an arrangement increases crew survivability, because the crew compartment is separated from the ready ammunition supply, and would be completely hidden when the tank is in a hull-down position. The crew will number just 3, all being carried within the hull itself. 
Historically, Russian tanks are given official designations when they are adopted for production, so even the name T-95 is speculative. The actual current GABTU code of the vehicle is Obyekt 640 (Russian: Объект 640). 
The current status of this project is unknown, it is possible that it has been frozen due to lack of funds and limited interest in the radically new design in the current geo-political situation. 201.128.98.189 03:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: Russia is  resuming its milltary pardes as we all know that under the cold war new tanks has ben showed to the public  under the parades so they might show the T-95  the parade wil be in May 9 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.175.5.65 (talk) 10:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a parade every year. What he's saying is that we don't need to break our back looking for info, it will be provided soon enough (similar situation as with pakfa)99.236.221.124 (talk) 21:01, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  the T-95 

message: Today I've had some talk about T-95 with one quite reputable and informed source, and the guy said that T-95 actually is not a one tank, but is in fact a semi-official designation of a design competition, where all three main tank development centers present their project. He said that between Omsk, Chelyabinsk and St.Pete there are five projects that entered the contest, and of them three prototypes are already built and are now being tested. I believe we could include it into the text, even if under the "rumors" title, as it looks convincing. --Khathi (talk) 16:58, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. One tank looks like a BMP/T turret and the other looks like it has a ring turret. There is at least one other but I've never seen an artists render or anything. 99.236.221.124 (talk) 21:03, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent info 

message: Huh I always heard it was gonna be called the T-100 and there was an article about it(not the WWII version) why it's called the T-95?--76.94.173.73 (talk) 03:58, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  T-100 

message: Does not mean cancellation of project, which uralvagonzavod is continuing independently. It may still be available for input by foreign investors or even the Russian government once the modernization of the airforce stops sapping the budget. 99.236.221.124 (talk) 17:52, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As the Uralvagonzavod homepage itself states, the Russian government is the sole-source, proprietary funder of the tank in question. That means the company CANNOT get other investors, it cannot export the tank without Russian government permission. Russia has stated it has no interest in the tank due to institutional obsolescence of the design, and half a dozen other reasons, they are unlikely to change their minds, especially as their reasons for cancelling the tank are perfectly correct. The tank is dead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.152.95.1 (talk) 14:52, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancellation of funding 

message: I took alot of speculation out and put things into the past tense. DON'T change it back please. - Heaney555z (talk) 15:37, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned up article 

message: It's the 2A83. The source that is linked to actually says that. I am going to assumed '2A81' is a typo. MicroBalrog (talk) 09:00, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixed main gun name