lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dell City, Texas

message: There seems to be no information anywhere pertaining to Linda Lake. It looks dry in the satellite images on google. Is there any information on this lake? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.130.193.52 (talk) 08:01, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linda Lake 
Talk:Racey

message: The album Smash & Grab as mentioned in the article linked to a 1939 movie of the same name, which has no relevance. I've removed the link. A seperate article for the album would also be warranted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geertvdheide (talk • contribs) 16:21, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong link

message: Songs are in italics, albums are in quotes. Hyacinth 17:14, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Style

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- The_socialist talk? 02:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Kett Turton

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
Barely a Start, with lists.
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 18:21, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Is it possible to get a better picture of this actor?  You can't really tell what he looks like from this onel.  It seems like mostly a "joke" picturel. 68.228.0.128 07:15, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I agree about the picture not really showing what he looks like - I'll try to find something more... normal.
Also, the Trivia section I have noticed is an almost direct copy (or paraphrase) from kettturtonfan.net. I haven't removed it as I don't wish to delete someone else's 'research', but can this be fixed in any way please?
Zombequin 09:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture / trivia section
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject British Motorsport

message: I have nominated Tom Pryce for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 08:03, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  FAR notice 

message: I've cleared c:Category:West Kingsdown of images related to Brands Hatch circuit, moving them to c:Category:Brands Hatch. Images there need further scrutiny as to categorization. The may include creation of new categories and addition of categories to images. Please feel free to assist in this task. Mjroots (talk) 09:43, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Brands Hatch images at Commons

message: Not sure how active the project is, but if anyone has the page watchlisted and also has access to 1980s/1990s racing magazines help is need with this article. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 21:08, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[John Bartlett (racing driver)]]
Talk:Kansas City Zoo & Aquarium

message: This is not really quite a B-class article. It needs an entrance photo, plus three or four more. OF the zoo, not closeups of animals. Pix showing the exhibits would be really good. It also needs a good copy edit, and has too may external links that need to be converted to citations. I have done a bit of work, but am marking the article as needing attention to WP Zoo. Donlammers (talk) 00:12, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Angela Kinsey

message: article appears heavily plagerised from 
--EXV // + @ 02:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyright violation? 

message: The "name" and "birth_name" parameters in the infobox should not display the same values. Template:Infobox person says, in part, "provide |birth_name= (below) if different from |name=". If "Angela Faith Kinsey" is the name she is commonly known by, then the "birth_name" field should be left blank. Eddie Blick (talk) 16:38, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names in infobox
Talk:Mark Curry (American actor)

message: Re-cooper-ating? is that pun honestly acceptable? ShigityShank 10:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is if you let it sit there. -- Ben (talk) 04:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pun

message: I've removed the reference to an emergency landing incident: it is of no real importance for his bio. The very fact it is mentioned seems to suggest that Curry was somehow involved in the incident, while he was not - he was just aboard the plane when it happened. GregorB (talk) 10:21, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emergency landing incident 
Talk:Mark Curry (British TV presenter)

message: An author, User:Markcurry99, claiming to be Curry himself, has removed the Personal Life section. His edit summary was "Please delete all mention of my personal life. it may harm my career!". I have restored this as I can't see any reason why the section should be problematic. It is referenced and makes no negative statements about Curry that would damage his career, social life or standing in general. I am disinclined to believe that the author who did this really is Curry. His contribution record looks a bit dubious to me. He also keeps trying to put is some stuff about an alleged ITV2 programme which gets no Google hits at all. Even ITV2 has a higher profile than that ;-). I think he is a hoaxer. That said, there might be a case for removing the name of Curry's partner. What do we think? --DanielRigal (talk) 17:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP Issues 

message: Is 'wife' the correct term for Mark Curry's partner?—Preceding unsigned comment added by MissyMink (talk • contribs) 13:27, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is unreferenced so I have removed it anyway. If it is true then it can be added back, with references, and correct terminology. I don't know it the term "wife" was intended to refer to his civil partner, but if it was then that is likely to be considered offensive. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:18, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  gender confusion (Later career section)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. As Mark Curry (British TV presenter) and Mark Curry (American actor). (closed by non-admin page mover) SilverLocust 💬 12:14, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: *Neutral The UK Mark Curry is primarily notable as a presenter, and less so as an actor, but I can see how having "American" and "English" in the titles might help readers to find the correct article more easily. I am unsure as to whether the move is worth doing or not. --DanielRigal (talk) 15:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nonetheless, both men have served as actors and presenters. If consensus were to prefer the non-analogous forms — Mark Curry (presenter) → Mark Curry (English presenter) and Mark Curry (actor) → Mark Curry (American actor) — I would also support such an alternative option. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 15:58, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

text: I would also support the alternative form Mark Curry (presenter) → Mark Curry (British TV presenter) per Necrothesp or simply Mark Curry (presenter) → Mark Curry (British presenter) if consensus decides that his radio presenting is sufficiently notable alongside his TV work. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 22:40, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 July 2023
Talk:Dexter Manley

message: To improve this article, someone needs to post an image. I don't have a copyright to any images of him; does anyone here have one?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guy1423 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I'm not going to change it because I don't have a reference, but it was well-known that Manley was functionally illerate during his tenure with the Redskins. 72.174.131.123 (talk) 00:08, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  mental health
Talk:Diamond Hill-Jarvis High School

message: anybody out there remember when the football team went 8-2 in 1981-1982 school year coachjefft (talk) 04:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diamond Hill Jarvis High School  

message: I have removed the history section as a probable copyright violation. The odd formatting of some of the paragraphs suggests to me that it was copied from a document with drop cap formatting: <newline>I<newline>n 1923. And the text was posted at Facebook two years before it arrived here. -- John of Reading (talk) 09:38, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation?
Talk:Cadwell Park

message: I very nearly put a  marker in the text itself, but it messes up the circuit navigation thingy (which is very non-Wikipedia-standard in itself, btw). Could someone with Cadwell knowledge please do some serious toning down of the near-advert quality of some of the text here? It may be true that club meetings here "are invariably crackers", but that doesn't make it NPOV. Loganberry (Talk) 23:55, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly lacks neutrality. --89.217.18.45 10:54, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV! 

message: I have assessed the article and unfortunatly it lacks sources, it is fairly short and needs some work done to get it to a C. I am also concerned about whether this article is completely neutral in terms of bias, which can be clearly seen throughout. I believe looking at the article's content it deserves a mid but I am sceptical due to the neutrality. The fact that this has been pointed out by another user almost 2 years ago is saying something.
95jb14 (talk) 16:01, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 4 years on and it hasn't improved.  Much as I dislike them I have bannered it.--Robert EA Harvey (talk) 19:09, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: The article is inaccurate in one key point - Nick Mason didn't actually drive the car!  The day was a comparison test between a Ferrari and Porsche - both Le Mans cars from the same era - both owned by Nick Mason.  He employed a professional driver for the test.  Those of us privileged to be there remember it well...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.141.55.232 (talk) 19:02, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nick Mason Ferrari Content 
Talk:Crystal Palace circuit

message: This article is written as though the motor racing circuit still exists in Crystal Palace Park - my edit to change that was undone.  Any reason why? I jog round the park regularly and there is certainly no motor racing circuit there. Tiger999 (talk) 14:51, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A greater part of the circuit is still extant, other than part of the main straight. North Tower Corner, The Glade Section (on the high ground adjacent to the concert bowl), the New Link (by the ski slope), the back straight alongside the Sports Centre, Anerley Ramp, Ramp Bend & Maxim Rise are all very much as they were when the circuit was in use. South Tower Corner has been altered in that vehicular access to the Park from Anerley Hill is via a quite steep slope which joins the Circuit from the "wrong" direction at the start of the Main Straight. It is true to say that if you did not know the track in its heyday, it would be easy to think that the tarmacked areas are just access roads, as that is what they are used for & other signs of the circuit (pits, barriers, signs etc.) have largely been removed. The circuit was used in the filming of "Rush" the 2013 released story of James Hunt & Niki Lauda. South Tower Corner was recreated for this as it was the site of a notable incident in Hunt's early career. Maps/plans of the circuit here Eagleash (talk) 22:43, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crystal Palace Circuit still in existence? 
Talk:Knockhill

message: If you have permission from a copyright owner, you need to get them to email permissions (at) wikipedia (dot) org with confirmation. After that's done and dusted, you can add a special notice to this talk page to that effect. It is not sufficient simply to assert here that you have such permission, since Wikipedia has no way of telling who you are; it must be proven, and the aforementioned method is the best way to do it. Loganberry (Talk) 15:29, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright again 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 21:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Knockhill Racing Circuit →  – WP:CONCISE. I am unable to find any references to other notable subjects with the name "Knockhill". The only two subjects I can find with the name "Knockhill" are the motor circuit and the hill it is built on, which aren't really distinct enough subjects to warrant separate articles. If there is another notable subject by this name please feel free to provide examples. I also believe that "Knockhill" is the WP:COMMONNAME of the venue, as seen here, here, here, here, here, and here. Unless examples of other notable Knockhills can be found then it would seem that the current title is unnecessary disambiguation. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 13:59, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 February 2021 

message: - I can see that you are relatively new to WP; you might like to think again about how this change reads. This entry is dated 17 October 2017 and shows that FIA level 3 was in place to expire 23 Feb 2019, so the award would significantly pre-date the suggestion in your change, which reads unclearly (I am aware of 'as of'). This was not an exhaustive search, I'll leave that up to you. A secondary source (press release) would be better, likely giving a definitive date. Thanks.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 00:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIA grade 3 licence 

message: I have removed this (with reasoning in the edit summary) as it's been going back and forth for some time with no substantiation that it is used in published works, and appears to be entirely promotional, contrary to neutral point of view. A quick Google shows connected businesses and minor/recent internet sites (one of the latter [fanzone-forum] states Ingliston was the home of... from the 1960s.
It was IP-added in 2019, see: this change. 82.13.47.210 (talk) 13:39, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged nickname: 'Home of Scottish Motor Racing'
Talk:Lydden Hill Race Circuit

message: I think this is a better track plan that the one currently used - it includes corner names, and also the current one is a bit misleading suggesting there is a pit-lane & buildings in the middle -which there aren't!
Kcordina  Talk  08:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, you’re right! Swaped it already. BTW, could you add the loose sections for Rallycross to your diagram – as Lydden is the sports birth place? Regards from Germany! RX-Guru 14:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: First, someone has copied data from this page on the official site, http://www.lyddenhill.co.uk/info.php, to the section.  It looks like the only reference in the page was used to disguise the source.  After I saw that, I researched the history of the page and found similar wording to that on the official page now was in older versions of the page.  My belief is that the site updated their page's wording and then one or more users would revisit the site and copy the changed text here.  Each time they copied the entire text.  Someone that knows the history of this track will need to rewrite the section from scratch. Will (Talk - contribs) 12:46, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the other way round. The new people at Lydden Circuit have taken all information about its history from the Wikipedia without credit. RX-Guru (talk) 14:05, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The history section has problems
Talk:Dick Bosman

message: Someone who can access (and read) box scores can look at this link and see the only games that might render the last statement of the opening paragraph untrue.  Check out the half-dozen or so games here, and then we can remove the citation needed tag from the lead paragraph. HuskyHuskie (talk) 01:45, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proof that he was the only one to blow his own perfect game

message: Still involved in Baseball 199.91.176.76 (talk) 16:50, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he still involved in Baseball at all?
Talk:Dick Hutton

message: Dick hutton 😏 2600:8800:51AA:A100:5F7:CEC7:256:6259 (talk) 00:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dick
Template talk:Ukrainian oblast

message: I am not good with tempates, so someone pls edit an extra field: "Cities of oblast subordinance" right after the list of raions. The "cities" field that follows should than be changed to "Other cities". This would be in agreement with . Regards, --Irpen 00:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, we are going the other way, listing all cities in one group. Please, see Talk:Subdivisions of Ukraine. --MapLover 00:34, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Subordinance

message: * And what about Oblast in Belarus or Russia? "Subdivisions of Ukraine". Please, Rename all Oblast -> Ukrainian oblast. Or add parameter  --Paukrus 00:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems
Talk:Night Train Lane

message: I'm not sure what the "status" quo was when you started, but for now - it's at least at a location that *could* be considered proper disambig (as opposed to say Dick Lane (football).  The real issue hear is - should it in fact be Night Train Lane instead of Dick Lane. I'm kinda thinking we need some more opinions on this but i've read WP:D and WP:NAME and I *think* they support just putting this at Night Train Lane. Thoughts? Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat  21:07, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: This article in one place says the name came from a song he listened to, and in another its says from his mode of transport. One can't be right.
GeneCallahan (talk) 04:23, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no proof at all that Lane got his nickname from a type of wine he supposedly drank.  This article really needs some work.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.141.154.97 (talk) 06:24, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two different stories on "Night Train" nickname 

message: The Pro Football Hall of Fame website(linked to in this entry) states that Lane was born in 1928, not 1927 as is claimed in the entry, and he was therefore 73, not 74, when he died. I'm curious as to the source of the 1927 birthdate and if there are any other sources that also give 1927 as Lane's year of birth.72.49.235.222 (talk) 18:00, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: As Lane's biography at his official website also lists Lane's year of birth as 1928, I am going to change the entry.72.49.235.222 (talk) 18:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth 

message: Sourcing is mixed as to his birth mother's name. Some say "Etta Mae King" and others say "Johnnie Mae King". At this point, I'm not certain which is correct. Cbl62 (talk) 10:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth mother's name 

message: Hi 2600:6C46:4000:16A0:E0BD:8527:86D2:DC18 (talk) 20:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sup
Talk:Rockingham Motor Speedway

message: Why isn't this track being considered to replace Silverstone? There is an infield track and it keeps the Grand Prix in Northants.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.162.125.117 (talk) 10:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, this discussion is not relevant here. Please note WP:TALK guidelines. Halsteadk (talk) 22:07, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh give over. And get a life!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.162.125.117 (talk) 18:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why on Earth does this article need to state that it is 30 minutes away from Bedford is beyond me? It is also 30 minutes away from Peterborough, Leicester and Northampton, all of which are bigger towns / cities - this would have more of an impact than BEDFORD!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.63.239.16 (talk) 15:27, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Dick Motta

message: Motta is an italian name... 213.140.17.100 22:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: probably he's italian

message: I have tagged as dubious some of the assertions that refer to the phrase It ain't over 'til the fat lady sings - this article and that at the very least are out of alignment. --Matilda talk 23:33, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: It ain't over 'til the fat lady sings
Talk:Santa Pod Raceway

message: This is pretty much directed at whoever 88.106.234.181 is (and I do have a pretty good idea believe me). Please refrain from posting links to the online merchandise shop, whether it's reasonably priced or not and also listing the three main people who run Santa Pod on a day to day basis. It's pretty obvious this post was from someone within the company, who else would know of the people mentioned on the page and who else would use the phrase "very well managed by" unless they were either conducting an in joke or self-glorifying. Please keep Wikipedia exactly as it was meant to be, a free, useful knowledge database free from bias, commercial or political influence and those desperately seeking a few strands of publicity.
RE: == Blatant advertising ==
I don't think Wiki is the place to make speculative comments about who is responsible for the edits, however, I agree that naming staff and commenting on how well something is or isn't managed are not useful remarks suitable for Wiki, so agree with the edits. One thing is for sure, and that is that the early versions of this page were copied and pasted directly from the Santa Pod website at the time, and were not written originally for Wiki. Where they came from I cannot tell.
RE: == Blatant advertising ==
Names of staff ended up back in the article by an anonymous user. They appear to be light hearted jokes as I don't think the information was correct but nonetheless, this isn't the place for them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlbertaForza (talk • contribs) 20:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blatant advertising 

message: Can I just make the point that regardless of what the Santa Pod website says, the dragstrip (and Podington village) are in Bedfordshire, not Northamptonshire.  I've lived within 5 miles all my life and it annoys me when people get it wrong (I know it's silly).  If we could leave the page with the correct information on it, that would be fantastic. Thanks.
RE: == Location ==
Despite the above message the county is still being changed. On any OS map it is clearly within Bedfordshire, likewise travelling from Rushden to Podington a sign clearly welcomes you to Bedfordshire. Only if you're Royal Mail is it in Northamptonshire (even the area code for Airfield Road is 01234). If you have ever been there and seen any Police vehicle, you will notice it is the Bedfordshire constabulary, and within the parish of Podington which is indisputably Bedfordshire.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.22.191.83 (talk) 18:37, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location 

message: The Flux Capacitor is now the world’s fastest street-legal electric car | Ars Technica UK record set at Santa Pod.... dave souza, talk 16:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Electric quarter mile..