Talk:Chimney

message: I'm curious: why is it you don't see more chimney pots in the US, especially when considering that many of the people who settled there originally came from Europe?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.67.205.73 (talk • contribs) 23 October 2005 (UTC)
:With the exception of historically important ones, homes are not kept for hundreds of years in the US. Most homes were built in the last 50 years. Fireplaces in most US homes are strictly for decorative purposes and rarely used. - mbeychok 19:34, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Curious

message: Hi fellows,
maybe someone wants to put this image in the article
(old industrial chimney, covered by a climbing plant)<--------80.123.44.48 16:57, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional image 

message: I like the list of remarkable chimneys, but most of those listed don't have any remarks to tell us why they are remarkable. I suggest removing those without anything in the remarks column. Please fill in justifications for those chimneys listed, or risk losing them from this article. Thanks, Gwernol 19:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Gwernol, I agree with you. Also, we now have about 70 or more chimneys in that table. Personally, I think that is more than enough!! Can we somehow call a stop to adding any more names?  Perhaps, we could also delete power plants that don't have a Wikipedia article to which they can be linked ... in other words all of those red-linked names. - mbeychok 20:27, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Gwernol 15:55, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remarkable chimneys 

message: I found many errors in the stack height conversions. I corrected them by using 1 metre = 3.281 feet. 
For USA stacks, I assumed that the feet were correct and then converted to metres. 
For all other countries, I assumed that the metres were correct and then converted to feet. - mbeychok 16:00, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If I had just waited a few minutes, until user:Gwernol had deleted most of the listed stacks, I would have saved myself a lot of converting. Ah, well! - mbeychok 16:09, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry about that, I wasn't trying to wipe out your good work, just get us down to a list of actually remarkable chimneys. Your edits should still be in the history, so we can get back to them if we need to restore any of the chimneys previously list. Best, Gwernol 16:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Converting metres to feet and vice versa  

message: Gwernol, why did you leave two "dismantled" chimneys in the list? I don't see how that makes them remarkable. - mbeychok 16:05, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More on Remarkable Chimneys 

message: How about more info on chimney liners? What are they made of, what do they do, and do people really need them? Deepfryer99 (talk) 16:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liners 

message: The following passage looks strange: 
"Industrial chimneys are commonly referred to as things with smoke coming out of them that spell like crap"...
--Daha6439 (talk) 11:53, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Suprising what some people will vandalise is'nt it? I guess it can be removed altogether. Elcaballooscuro (talk) 11:03, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism?

message: At this writing there is a section with the awkward title of Chimney draught or draft, and the draught or draft phrasing is repeated in the text.  That's just silly.  Someone needs to look back in the history and figure out whether the earliest non-stub version of the article was written in UK English or US English, and revise accordingly.  At first reference (in the text, not in the section heading) it would be OK to mention the other spelling parenthetically, for example
:...That movement or flow of combustion air and flue gas is called "natural draught" (US: "draft")...
if the UK version is chosen, or the reverse in the other case.  See WP:ENGVAR.  --Trovatore (talk) 20:57, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "draught or draft" 

message: I came here to find out why buildings in UK have chimney stacks, while in other countries there is just one chimney that is shared by all fireplaces from different floors. Does anyone know? In the parts on stacks I did not understand where transverse loads come from.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.101.22.212 (talk) 19:11, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why chimney stacks? 

message: See: "Later chimneys were constructed by placing the bricks around tile liners, a system invented by Malik" - please excuse my ignorance, but I assume this is no serious reference? If so, some kind of link or explanation would be needed.  I assume this could be removed, though.ASchudak (talk) 09:58, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Malik? 

message: Alliance for Green Heat provides a much richer history than this article, but I haven't been able to corroborate those dates (yet) on the Internet. The Chinese version of this article also mentions chimney-like structures going back thousands of years in India and China. Does anyone have more information on the history of chimneys? --BB12 (talk) 10:22, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Encyclopaedia of the History of of Science... has a bit of corroboration. --BB12 (talk) 10:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More history 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Chimney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060313023347/http://www.kongres.elektra.ru/FOTO/10.jpg to http://www.kongres.elektra.ru/FOTO/10.jpg
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100616115440/http://www.usinspect.com/resources-for-you/advisory-report-archives/2003-archives/chimney-maintenance to http://www.usinspect.com/resources-for-you/advisory-report-archives/2003-archives/chimney-maintenance
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I'm more than shocked that this entire piece seems to be a hijack attempt over the subject of industrial smokestacks and its century plus history of pollution.  I was expecting to find dramatic pictures of severe levels of pollution connected with smokestack industries only to find this sanitized "chimney" discussion as if there was no real historic connections between pollution by industrial societies.  I have no idea how smokestack history got cut into one sentence here, but its an environmental travesty of monumental proportions that this has happened.  Energynet (talk) 22:12, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The following sentence was pulled due to lack of citation on its claim - 
In the case of chemically aggressive output, a sufficiently tall chimney can allow for partial or complete self-neutralization of airborne chemicals before they reach ground level.   
It should stay out until said claim is documented.  Energynet (talk) 17:53, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  much more history 

message: We have one link foot chimney? Is it existing term? I also founded in etwiki :et:mantelkorsten--Estopedist1 (talk) 09:05, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foot chimney? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:50, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: 1) None of this seems relevant.
2)  ‘also known as smokestack in in the United States’ somewhere else would be sufficient
3) there is no risk of confusion with the lesser-known term ‘smokestack industry’ and the reference here is odd
4) I don’t edit much so will wait a week before changing anything 2A00:23C7:A825:6101:2538:773D:1C4C:228E (talk) 00:50, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second para ‘in the United States…’ should go