lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Clu Gulager

message: I doubt that martin birds were nesting "near the house" or anywhere else on November 16th, 1928. I believe this story was hype by the studio. His middle name is Martin & it appears that the Cherokee name for martin birds is clu or clu-clu. 
S2grand (talk) 05:50, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This section needs attention, particularly the Falconcrest run-on, comma-spliced sentence.  rags (talk) 07:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Acting Career" 

message: Why is this not mentioned 2600:100F:B120:2A27:DCCF:717F:EA04:8AE2 (talk) 16:05, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Virginian
Talk:Pope Clement VIII

message: Synod of Brest was held 1595 in Lithuania -- This is wrong, in 1595 two orthodox Bishops were recieved by Clemens VIII in Rome in order do find an agreement on the articles of the union that was to follow.  The sobory (synods) in Brest were being held a year later in 1596 (see Serhii Plochy The Cossacks and Religion in Early Modern Ukraine pp. 82-4).  If you want to call the land Lithuania, just do go on, but since in 1569 the Lithuanian Grand Duchy was united with Poland it seems to be more adequate if you were calling it the Pol.-Lith.-Commonwealth.  Philipp  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.15.127.133 (talk) 22:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unio Berestiensis

message: Removed the following, in reference to Clement's Cum saepe accidere: "This followed similar Roman laws regarding Jewish merchants in the former Christian Constantinopel, where Jew merchants were not required to solicit who they bought merchandise from." There is no particular connection. The article does not claim Clement invented anti-semitism. --Wetman 01:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-semitism

message: First of all, I don't think that referring to his famIly as "distinguished" is a neutral point of view.  Second of all, the article about his family, the Aldobrandini,  refers to them as "undistinguished" until Clement VIII became pope.  That's certainly conflicting information. Wikigreenwood (talk) 16:22, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflicting opinions

message: Ive expanded the lede and removed the related tag. I basically just summarised some of the article content and put it in the lede. Tigerboy1966  21:04, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Lede
Talk:What Kind of Fool (Heard All That Before)

message: I edited this comment:- "The songs reception itself became one of Minogue's least successful singles to date, only scoring just over 20,000 views on Youtube."
This has a number of problems:-
* The use of the word "reception" implies critical response around the time of release, when most people hadn't even heard of the Internet, and YouTube was well over a decade away!
* Using one upload as an example- official or not- doesn't account for all the other uploads
* Doesn't take into account the time it was uploaded
* The "20,000" figure will inevitably date
* Synthesising the previous three points into a measure of popularity is bordering on backdoor OR anyway.
In short, it's been removed. Ubcule (talk) 21:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: YouTube as measure of success
Talk:What Made You Say That

message: It was a Country music video and bared her midriff and navel, a taboo at the time.
2001:4898:80E8:8:0:0:0:66F (talk) 06:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "controversial-at-the-time video" 
Talk:What Would You Do? (Tha Dogg Pound song)

message: There's a inconsistence with the name of the song, with it being written with a question mark (as What Would You Do?) and without the question mark (as What Would You Do) in the same article. Wich is the correct spelling of the title? OdensGod (talk) 07:45, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistence with the name
Talk:Clyde Simms

message: WikiProject Biography Assessment
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 04:31, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment
Talk:Co Adriaanse

message: I have never heard of the first name Jacobson. Shouldn't it be Jacobus? Renke 23:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At least the UEFA seems to think so: http://www.uefa.com/competitions/ucl/news/kind=1/newsid=443526.html, Renke 23:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

text: In that case it would have been Jacobszoon, which it isn't. No it's just Jacobson, not Jacobus or anything else. We're not his parents who came up with his name. Knurftendans 09:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jacobson??? 
Talk:In a basket

message: This is a bad word to use, since it's ambiguous: the word refers to a starter in the UK but to a main course in the US. I'm guessing the former use is meant here, but it's not clear and a different word would be better. Loganberry (Talk) 01:51, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Entrée is still there, and still ambiguous. I don't want to change it myself because I'm uncertain which is being meant. Loganberry (Talk) 01:15, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entrée? 

message: You might like to add that chicken in the basket was mainly eaten with the fingers, not with cutlery. I never enjoyed it, as I didn't like getting my fingers that messy! Vince Calegon 08:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  finger food 

message: I understand that in the UK chicken in a basket was 'invented' by one of the major pub chains in the 1950s, but I have no references.
However it has fallen out of fashion. I have not seen it for years in the UK, but have no references.
On the other hand, I have seen Hahn im Korb in Germany, literally translated as Chicken in a basket. I will add this.
Lkingscott (talk) 21:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Out of fashion
Talk:Cochin Haneefa

message: In some of his Tamil movies and press reports, he is named as VMC Haneefa. Should this be included as his professional name as well?--Sodabottle (talk) 08:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He is popularly known as Cochin Haneefa, see this Hindu article. If he is also known as VMC Haneefa, it may be mentioned in the article. Salih (talk) 09:56, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually i have no idea if VMC haneefa is used in Kerala and malayalama films. I asked the question, because I, as a Tamil film watcher have always known him as VMC haneefa, from the credits in Tamil films. I was surprised to learn that it was his stage name and he has an even more popular stage name. "VMC Haneefa" gets only one tenth of google hits as "Cochin Haneefa", so it need not be in the lead. Perhaps in the middle paragraphs can i insert "also credited as VMC Haneefa"?--Sodabottle (talk) 11:22, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, you can insert it. I knew that he was known by the name VMC Haneefa in Tamil Nadu, but not many in Kerala don't know this name. Salih (talk) 13:03, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  name? 

message: I propose that section  filmography be split into a separate page called  Cochin Haneefa filmography. The mentioned content is off-topic and large enough to warrant a separate page. – StreetSodatalk 19:23, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting proposal
Talk:When I Grow Up (To Be a Man)

message: A comment on the quality of of the song - it was clearly POVWschart 03:00, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed POV comment
Talk:Retailers' cooperative

message: Syracuse Real Food Coop would appear to be a consumers' cooperative. dml 01:57, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Errors

message: I decided to remove the 'examples' section because it was just getting way out of hand; I personally suggest creating List of retailers' cooperatives and adding the elements with wikiarticles there. Thoughts? Veinor (talk to me) 00:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been done.  I suggest adding to the See Also list. Ericfluger (talk) 16:52, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: List of examples
Talk:Warrumbungles

message: I disagree with the proposed merger however I propose
* Warrumbungles should be an article explicitly about the geological feature
:Facilities in the area etc should be a minor section linking back to...
* Warrumbungles National Park should discuss the park itself, with a minor section referring readers to the Warrumbungles article.
Many readers will be primarily interested in one issue or the other: either the geological feature, or visiting the park. The national park provides recreational facilities and a protected area of natural habitats with the centrepiece (the reason the park was created) being the geological feature. But many bushwalkers aren't into geology and many geologists only walk through the bush in order to reach an interesting rock outcrop.
Garrie 01:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, that there shouldn't be a merge.  The mountain range has its own history, seperate from the area defined as the national park.  Carnarvon Gorge is also distinct from the Carnarvon National Park it is contained within. - Shiftchange 12:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of Merge with Warrumbungles National Park article, 9 July 2006
Talk:Michael Stanley

message: I remember his band's popularity during the '80s. I grew up in that part of Ohio. The only two songs of his I recall are "This Is My Town" and "I've Done Everything For You". Any Northeast Ohioan out there in Wikipedia-land  recall which album that last song I mentioned was from?Jlujan69 02:00, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article needs more citations from reliable sources and has problems with some peacock terms. It would be great if anyone can help with these issues.--SabreBD (talk) 11:47, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The chart performance section is redundant and could be removed. Any guidance on what sections need references or peacock terms to be rewritten? Piriczki (talk) 15:01, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The biography section has no citations, but when I tagged this I didnt realise there was an Allmusic article at , so we can probably get most of them from there. Terms like "huge sensation", really need to go.. I think most can go while that section is re-edited to fit reliable sources.--SabreBD (talk) 15:10, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: To add to this article:  Stanley's ancestry/heritage. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 13:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: As he died of lung cancer, was Stanley a smoker? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 13:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Smoker?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New South Wales

message: Summer Hill, New South Wales has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:22, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[Summer Hill, New South Wales]] 

message: See discussion for linking both needs-photo and state parameters: Template talk:WikiProject Australia#Both needs-photo and state parameters --ThylacineHunter (talk) 05:42, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another update request for Template:WikiProject Australia 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Valley Heights Locomotive Depot Heritage Museum#Requested move 4 July 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Fork99 (talk) 11:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Valley Heights Locomotive Depot Heritage Museum#Requested move 4 July 2023]] 

message: An editor has been working on Lydham Hall for two years or so. It is the only article that they have edited. Unfortunately, although the edits were presumably made with good faith, the editor has completely bollixed the referencing system. Does anyone from this project have the time and patience to fix the article or teach the editor how to fish? 76.14.122.5 (talk) 02:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: See Talk:Lydham Hall#Referencing, and discuss there if necessary. Mitch Ames (talk) 07:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Lydham Hall]]
Talk:All Shook Up (musical)

message: I noticed a few aspects of this article that could likely be improved, however before I edit anything, I want to make sure that I'm not changing anything that I shouldn't.
The article states that the synopsis (and therefore presumably the song list) are taken from the current licensed production. However, according to WP:WPMT/AS#NUMBERS, shouldn't the Broadway version be used instead? (There are some differences.) Also, the synopsis is nearly 1300 words long, but WP:WPMT/AS#NUMBERS states that two-act musicals' synopses should generally be between 800 and 1100 characters, with exceptions for more complicated plots. Is this plot sufficiently complicated to justify this length? I could believe so; all of the different characters' love interests form quite a tangled web, I just wanted to see if anyone with more experience editing plot summaries had any thoughts on this.
Is a character list necessary? According to WP:WPMT/AS#NUMBERS complex plot or characters are enough to warrant a list separate from the synopsis. This is a similar point to the above. Any thoughts? Also, according to WP:WPMT/AS#NUMBERS vocal ranges should be omitted unless there is a consensus to include them. Unless someone has a good reason to keep them, I will remove them in my next edit.
The "Love Plots" section seems redundant. The reader should be able to gain all of this information from the synopsis.
Rocky Role (talk) 16:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Somewhat late response here. Yes, the plot summary is way too long, and you should feel free to prune it mercilessly. The synopsis isn't a replacement for watching the show; it should only hit the main points and provide an overview. The original broadway version is the most relevant, but a short section on the differences might be appropriate iff they are significant and secondary sources have discussed them in depth (not just in passing). The character list is… fine, but optional. If it stays it needs a little formatting. Feel free to  me if I can be of any assistance. --Xover (talk) 06:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I took the liberty of making some editorial revisions, based on part of the above discussion: formatted character list (stay or delete, not sure); vocal ranges deleted; add references; add short section with ref on US tour. The discussion points about plot is excellent, but I prefer not to edit it myself, as I have not seen the musical and I fear I could do more harm than good. I'm done. Flami72 (talk) 19:06, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Points for consideration
Talk:Cognitive model

message: The paragraph as found on March 17, 2014 describes linguistics in children with some minor reference to box-and-arrow models, instead of the other way around.  I visited this page because I have never heard of this stuff before and am, therefore, not qualified to fix this.  Cheddar3210 (talk) 18:48, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box-and-Arrow Models 

message: “In cognitive psychology, a model is a simplified representation of reality.”
---
“In cognitive science, a cognitive model is a model of cognitive processes.”
The relationship between these two sentences is dubious, since cognitive psychology is part of cognitive science (or the cognitive sciences). The reader may have the impression that cognitive psychology is not related to cognitive science. Both definitions apply to cognitive science.
//wiki noob//
Phainomenon 11:54, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: But cognitive psychology is also a part of psychology. 㓟 (talk) 11:49, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cognitive Science Includes Cognitive Psychology 

message: Please would an interested editor assess the material added at User:Mwakanosya/Optimal sequential decision making, incorporate what is useful, blank or redirect that page as WP:COPYARTICLE, and leave a note here when done? – Fayenatic London 08:23, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandoned user draft
Talk:Diane DiMassa

message: It looks like Diane "hothead paisan" DiMassa is not the same as Diane DiMassa, PhD, member of the luxuriant flowing hair club for scientists (http://improbable.com/projects/hair/2003/dimassa-hair-hi-res.jpg via http://improbable.com/projects/hair/hair-club-top.html) Rmd1023 (talk) 19:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Donald Wills Douglas Sr.

message: You must be joking ?.
What a stupid lie. You do know that it is a criminal offence don't you ?.
Well you have been advised.
GCHQ   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.50.71.238 (talk) 21:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 
Talk:Kafr Kanna

message: "Encyclopaedia", my foot. More like a Fake News site.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 19:41, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sure, it is perfectly relevant to post here scurrilous anti-Israel propaganda ...

message: = good source  Zerotalk 01:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note for later 

message: ... as it is sometimes used in scientific contexts for Kafr Kanna. Right now a WP search for Kafr Qanna leads nowhere. Thanks. ArmindenArminden (talk) 18:54, 16 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Pls add redirect for search term "Kafr Qanna"
Talk:Tzvi Ashkenazi

message: Not very succesful ORCOTW so far. Do any of us happen to have some of his responsa? Maybe that person could translate and post here some notable teshuvos? --Daniel575 02:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's parse this old junk to death. I don't trust the old Jewpedia. Killed by cannotshot? An encyclopedia can't possibly be a source, can it? I am sure we can't source it from elsewhere, so this stuff will mostly have to go. And the whole Chayyun business deserves maybe 2 lines. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree, I think it's better than nothing. Might as well keeep it the way it is rather than delete it all. I found it an interesting read the first time I read it, but I don't have anything to add either. Maybe in the future we should focus on more notable rabbonim - people about whom more information can be found. --Daniel575 02:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The 100 year old juicy biographical details are 1. irrelevant, 2. possibly fake, and 3. non-confirmable in the usual wiki way. He's way notable on his accomplishments as a rabbi, which is why we're here, not because of cannonshot etc. - CrazyRussian talk/email 02:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mid-America Regional Council

message: I have to ask why someone would think this article (though not very well expanded) is not notable. If we include geographic information in WP, this fits under that category. While it could possibly be viewed as a corporation, it is in fact a regional, semi-government, oversight organization in Missouri. We have nine... maybe ten of them to coordinate efforts of cities and counties in a region. MARC also happens to extend into a few Kansas counties simply by the nature of the metro that it serves.
I don't have time to look up sources at the moment, but they collect and analyze area statistics, operate a transportation system, and several other services. If someone gets the chance to update this, please do... I'll try to come back and add more in when I can.--Westleyd (talk) 11:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: There is a page for Marc and MARC, only the second of which refers to this page.--Westleyd (talk) 11:02, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: MARC redirects to Marc. RJFJR (talk) 15:30, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:George Fitch (author)

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 09:24, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:SS Washington

message: This table lists gross tonnage under the displacement field.  They are not the same.  When one tries to change the name of the field to "tonnage"-- the correct term-- the gross tonnage figure does not appear, and in its place appears the word "unknown".  This seems to be due to the use of a template for naval vessels.  Can anyone correct this?  Tonnage is the proper measure here, which has nothing to do with displacement.  Kablammo 02:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since GT didn't come into effect until 1980, I'm pretty sure it's meant to be GRT.  I adjusted it as such. HausTalk 16:10, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tonnage

message: :It seems there is some redundancy. This 2006 start-class article is about the same ship as the 2008 start-class USS Mount Vernon. The 2006 start-class article SS Manhattan is the same as the 2008 start-class USS Wakefield. The Mount Vernon and Wakefield articles are by the same author that may not have known the others existed.  Otr500 (talk) 16:06, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the overlap between the two articles is enough to warrant a merger (and perhaps lop off the extraneous log info from Mount Vernon's page). I'm putting up merger templates on both pages. 174.0.253.201 (talk) 14:19, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  Each is a different subject, regardless it concerns the same vessel.  With different focuses.  WP is lucky when there is so much to create a legitimate article around regarding a "private" vessel's commandeered WWII service.  It is much better, and easier, for readers to keep the two topics separate.2601:196:180:DC0:8417:1C5A:8581:D612 (talk) 18:21, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, with no merge, given that the April proposal has received no support and an uncontested objection, with stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 19:15, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same ships?
Talk:David Galenson

message: After reading an article about him and his work on Wired, I became quite interested. I searched Wikipedia for his name, but found only results with papers published by him, serving as references for articles.
I've decided to create this page because he seems notable enough, and I tried my best to fill it with as much information as I could find, but I couldn't find anything resembling a biography. His birth year might be wrong, since I used the wired article statement about him being 50 years old at the time to calculate it.
The sources I used are in the external links.
Hopefully this page is relevant enough for Wikipedia, as I'd like to see more information about him and his work.
Phelan 02:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article claims multiple facts using citations from autobiographical sources. Some of the main points of the article are unsubstantiated and need citations, also.
Famouseconomist (talk) 23:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations needed and possible bias
Talk:When the Lights Go Out (song)

message: From the article:
:An alternate version of the song, which Abs' rap replaces J's rap was made especially for the US release; thus being two separate videos for each version.
Huh? --zenohockey 03:55, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can anyone clarify this sentence? 
Talk:Can't Get It Out of My Head

message: Moving this from the article. It always sounded like "wave she came" to me too, but this could be the poster boy for original research. See WP:OR.--Walor (talk) 22:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Black Sifichi

message: Let me know if he is really notable. :) Dlohcierekim 03:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: I removed the orphan tag, as numerous links have been added since November 2009. Kiwux (talk) 12:53, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder if we could get a picture?  Also if we offset the discography with it's own section that could make it more user friendly :)Kr0512 (talk) 07:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphan page