Talk:Asset protection

message: First, I hate to pull rank, bur I am legally qualified and I have been a practioner in this area for over 30 years, trusts are trusts, insurance is insurance. The only link herein is because the solutions are somewhat similar but in reality different from practical and legal purposes. The API is similar to a property and casualty approach to the assets within, a trust is a legal envelope to only hold them, the two should not meetJlwiki2008 (talk) 20:31, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger

message: Interesting since this article only contains one reference and that is to the single provider of asset protection insurance, whats the problem, according to the original they invented it? I guess Cigarbill must have his own conflict, sorry Billy its easy to find out the name and the site (took me all of two minutes  www.aseassurance.com), please leave your conflicts to yourself, we (inour office found the site and the link very helpfull)Jlwiki2008 (talk) 20:36, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Eliminating Advertising

message: I agree take this piece of bad prose out.
The article contains the following statement:  "Asset Protection began in the Middle Ages to keep the Government from foreclosing the land away from the peasants."
Just out of curiosity, when did peasants in the Middle Ages ever own land?  I believe that a dispassionate historical inquiry will show that the differences over land ownership were between the King and his nobles, and that the peasants were subject to both.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.13.4.47 (talk) 18:31, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for Sources

message: The article was deleted today because it was composed of three separate copyrighted pieces online:
*http://www.psp-interactive.com/issues/articles/2007-02_09.asp
*http://www.incorporatedoffshore.net/assetprotection.htm
*http://www.real-estate-secrets.net/article-Asset-Protection.html
It was difficult to tell when the text on these sites was pasted into our article. However, the original research and synthesis made from the editing in the interims between the additions gave me no choice but to delete it all and start over. 
There are thousands of references for which a new article on asset protection can be created. Wikipedia should have a good article on this subject instead of the mishmash of crap that was here yesterday. KrakatoaKatie 00:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is unfortunately still in a sad state: "There are many programs available to help an individual or business minimize and/or avoid your tax liability," and similar statements makes it sound like an advertisement again.  I'm changing all the "you"s to sound more neutral, but actually the article just needs a proper rewrite. --Leviel (talk) 14:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problems 

message: As to my knowledge ERISA does not cover 401(k) plans. Those plans are covered by some state legislation exemption laws - but not all. Therefore this page does not seem very reliable to me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.54.90.230 (talk) 07:20, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inadequate information 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Asset protection. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708085701/http://www.bovelanga.com/publications/articles/US%20as%20Offshore%20Asset%20Protection%20Jurisdiction.pdf to http://www.bovelanga.com/publications/articles/US%20as%20Offshore%20Asset%20Protection%20Jurisdiction.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified