lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cypriot Turkish

message: im pretty sure that cypriot turkish is an official language of (true) republic of cyprus. Am i wrong?
86.128.148.203 21:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (Still, only two official languages in the Republic of Cyprus, being Greek and Turkish. English at a stretch might be semi-official. It's used widely, but legislation and court rulings don't have to be in it, even if the government portal has lots of things in English also, and it's taught in all the schools)Eugene-elgato (talk) 01:58, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: official languages

message: As a Turkish Cypriot, I have never heard calling our dialect "Gibrizlija". This term is not an accurate term because Turkish Cypriots do not use it. We usually say "Kıbrıs Türkçesi, Kıbrıs şivesi" (Cypriot Turkish, Cypriot accent), but not Gibrizlija... I therefore suggest to omit references to Gibrizlija, because there is no such word here!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiturk (talk • contribs) 09:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gibrizlija 

message: The language codes section has only Glottolog.
Shouldn't it be  or  at least?
--Error (talk) 10:15, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Code
Talk:ROMBAC 1-11

message: were the hell did you get this information!? ...to my knowledge, and I lived 33 years in Romania, not one ROMBAC ever entered comercial operation ... actually, they never finished one! Thank GOD! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.217.164.162 (talk • contribs) 
: What exactly do you mean? If you talk about this edit: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ROMBAC_1-11&diff=75506698&oldid=56140446 I've indicated the source to be: http://www.aerotransport.org/php/go.php?query=airframe&where=ifnull%28t.parent%2Ct.type_id%29%3D3230003+and+a.rowseq%3D99017&orderby=2&info=Subfleet%3A+BAC_111+of+Romavia&qstring=BAC_111+of+Romavia
: And you also have this: The Rombac deal which proves that there were ROMBACs built. And while I have lived only 20 something years in Romania, I do remember television news boasting the construction of ROMBAC. --Vlad|-> 14:30, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:DFS 346

message: Have re-written the worst sections, but it could still use some work. Removed the "needs copy editing" banner. Routlej1 (talk) 13:50, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy editing 

message: Clearly the Soviet Union did not use an actual American Superfortress to carry the rocket plane to altitude; this is a picture of a Tupolev Tu-4.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.60.210.5 (talk) 17:34, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Captioned, "B-29" 
Talk:Adventist Society for Religious Studies

message: This was appropriately a separate article. Why is it now redirected to "Seventh-day Adventist Church"? If "Adventist Theological Society" is a separate article, "Adventist Society for Religious Studies," its parent organization, certainly should be also. Wctrenchard (talk) 18:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Seventh-day Adventist Church
Talk:St Thomas More High School

message: I've changed the name of this article from St Thomas More High School for Boys to St Thomas More High School. It's worth an additional note. The school converted to academy status in 2011, and as a result, technically, the old school closed and a new one was opened. It's basically the same school. It's not entirely clear when the school changed its name, probably around the same time, but it has by now definitely dropped the "for boys" bit of it. -- zzuuzz (talk) 08:54, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Change of name
Talk:Wheelock, Cheshire

message: #Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
#Photos need to be added.
#References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)
 DDStretch  (talk) 16:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment Report 
Talk:MPAA Series 1

message: Truth be told, I feel this article is useless. There is literally no information that cannot be found in My Parents are Aliens episodes, and that article states it better. Unless someone can improve this article and justify its' existence, I'm going to nominate it for deletion. Crimson Shadow 20:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is currently the only one containing information about My Parents are Aliens series 1, as the section on the list just links here.  Suggest merging?  RobbieG 11:19, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It isn't necessary to have a seperate article just for one series. I've now this merged to the main article. Pufnstuf 19:22, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Board track racing

message: Should it be added to this article the fact that all racing in the United States stopped from 1942 and 1945 for World War II? It probably ended any tracks that weren't already closed. Royalbroil 21:38, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to The Golden Age of the American Racing Car, it was the Depression, not the war, that ended board track ovals in favor of the comparatively maintainance-free dirt...and even then, it eventually got to the point that Indianapolis WAS, effectively, the national championship, nearly all on its own, with only one other event registered as occurring, for instance, in 1937.  To put it simply, I don't think board track racing made it past 1932, let alone to 1941. --Chr.K. (talk) 19:36, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Circle Track (9/84, p.77) has board track racing into 1939, anyhow. A question, tho: is the Nutley Velodrome the one known as New Jersey Motordrome?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  17:24, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Board track racing in the 1940s

message: There're some seriously unsourced sentences here......I removed a couple of them. It's kinda sad in that a' lot of them probably have some validity.Bddmagic (talk) 20:20, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sad
Talk:The Learning Annex/Edit and revert summary

message: ===Messages Left on User talk:207.190.200.126's page:===
Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but you may wish to create a account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, including:
*The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
*The use of your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed.
*The ability to create new pages.
*The ability to rename pages.
*The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
*The ability to upload images.
*The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
*Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
Cheers, →James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 20:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not make anymore edits on The Learning Annex before a consensus discussion on that articles talk page.  For relavent info see good faith policy. We appreciate your contributions, Thanks. →James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 20:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

text: →James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 20:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Action Items

message: Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but you may wish to create a account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, including:
*The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
*The use of your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed.
*The ability to create new pages.
*The ability to rename pages.
*The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
*The ability to upload images.
*The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
*Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.
We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, make sure to sign and date your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
Cheers, →James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 20:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please do not make anymore edits on The Learning Annex before a consensus discussion on that articles talk page.  For relavent info see good faith policy. We appreciate your contributions, Thanks. →James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 20:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

text: →James Kidd (contr/talk/email) 20:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Messages Left on [[User talk:207.190.200.126]]'s page:
Talk:Marek's disease virus

message: MDV should not be merged with Merek's Disease. Main (and not the only) reason is separate article o MDV will help virologists understand virus better and help pathologists to understand pathology of the virus better. Sometimes it is confusing for novice readers to understand and they are often confused between the two. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.233.36.41 (talk • contribs) 
: I think having separate articles only makes sense when there in enough distinct information on each topic.  Consider how it is done for Rabies:  The main page describes both the virus and the disease.  There is a separate page for Lyssavirus which describes the family of viruses of which Rabies virus is a member.  It has links to subpages for those viruses, but in the case of Rabies virus, it is just a redirect back to Rabies because there is a one-to-one correspondence between the virus and the disease.  If Marek's disease had other causes besides MDV, or if MDV caused other diseases, then it would make sense to separate them. —Dgiest c 20:53, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Guilford Township, Medina County, Ohio

message: why iadded the expand tag this artical needs more infor so lets gets some okOo7565 20:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maranatha Volunteers International

message: This article is outdated since, Maranatha Voluteers International built sheds for Paradise, California. Catfurball (talk) 23:35, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated
Talk:Operation Whitecoat

message: This paragraph has nothing to do with Operation Whitecoat at all. I am removing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.170.245 (talk) 12:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desmond Doss paragraph removal 

message: The Operation Whitecoat Article fails to discuss the double edged reason for enacting the program. On the one hand, there was a quest for vaccines against potential bioweapons (and this view is adequately described). On the other hand, data in the project was used to improve the weapon capacity of the American germ warfare program (this view is not discussed, but is fully outlined in the American Experience source noted within the article).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.216.147.189 (talk) 00:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I'll work on this later. Jrtayloriv (talk) 05:26, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: I visited my son in his tour of duty with the white coats.I was given a tour and saw him canulizing the liver of a rat.It was an experiment in cancer therapy.He showed me a medium sized monkey in a cage he was caring for. He stated it had bitten him.This was a secret project.He told my daughter,Later that the monkey had been infected by the Ebola virus and an aids like virus.He died in 2000 of the worst rapid spreading cancer that I have seen in 40 years of medical practice.He was buried in a military cemetary on 09/11/2000. I probably will not be able to get his classified hospital records.I continue to research this to help give me closure of the worst experience a parent can experience in the loss of a child. Ivan L Reeve MD of Blue Jay Ca  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.140.1.142 (talk) 06:41, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son in whitecoats died of vicious cancer 

message: Why is there no mention of war criminals "scientist" pardoned and used in this operation?
78.80.26.123 (talk) 00:31, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nazi German and Japanese war criminals missing here
Talk:Project governance

message: The second section of this article appears to be nothing but a sales pitch for the company listed in the external links.  No objective verifiable information is presented.  External links should be to available sources of reference material on the subject, not to a vendor's sales site.56.0.163.16 20:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The "Roles" section does not specify roles. In addition, not all of what it specifies is within the scope of Project Governance as I understand it. The next section, listing the Elements is much more appropriate. E.g. establishing the foundation of project governance cannot happen within project governance. Evaluating and selecting project proposals is also outside the scope of project governance as defined here: project governance assumes the project proposal has already been approved by the organization, e.g. within the framework of corporate (IT) governance or if there is a hierarchy, within the frameworks of program or portfolio governance. JEH (talk) 03:04, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Roles?
Template talk:The Stone Roses

message: Why doesn't someone include links to their singles on this template?  I think it would help to make the template more useful, as it doesn't link to much, but at the same time, wouldn't necessarily make it too cluttered either.  Perhaps I'll go ahead and add them myself if no one disagrees. Sdoroudi 20:50, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Singles
Talk:Selma Burke

message: this sentence.  If it is to remain it needs a lot of work.
:"Selma Burke was a nice and lovely woman with alot of peeps that didn't like her. "
Carptrash (talk) 23:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just removed 

message: but it contains too much (opinion) caption.  This much text belongs in the article, if anywhere.  It reads as if it was taken from elsewhere, but who knows?  Any way, here is the caption I'm moving.
:::" is one of the few African-Asian women sculptors who achieved a high level of national recognition during her lifetime. She received national recognition for her relief portrait of Franklin Delano Roosevelt which was the model for his image on the dime. She was committed to teaching art to others, so she established the Selma Burke Art School in Durham and opened the Selma Burke Art Center in Pittsburgh, PA."
The bit about the dime, for example.  is much debated, (though we could discuss it more) and is already in the article, so need not be in the caption.
Carptrash (talk) 14:39, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I just copied the caption from the image on flickr... edit/fix how you see fit. — raeky (talk | edits) 14:41, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great new picture 

message: Even though I'm a resident of Mooresville, and Mrs. Burke's accomplishments deserve much recognition, I think it's worth at least mentioning that there's controversy over the dime design, mention of which I have edited the article to include.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdtew (talk • contribs) 05:21, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Article now has only the briefest suggestion of controversy. Still seems very pro-Burke. A detailed counter view is The racist history of the FDR Dime - perhaps the controversy should be detailed in a separate article rather than in both the Burke and Sinnock articles ? - Rod57 (talk) 06:36, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dime controversy 

message: The picture labeled as Selma Burke in her studio is in fact NOT Selma Burke. It is an unidentified woman in Burke's studio. Reference to photo below from the Smithsonian Photography Archives. 
https://siris-juleyphoto.si.edu/ipac20/ipac.jsp?session=1640208841H6L.135&profile=julallimg&source=~!sijuleyphotos&view=subscriptionsummary&uri=full=3100018~!100405~!8&ri=7&aspect=subtab31&menu=search&ipp=20&spp=20&staffonly=&term=Selma+Burke&index=.GI&uindex=&aspect=subtab31&menu=search&ri=7
Madeinahurry (talk) 21:54, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture under "Sculpture" is not correct 

message: Hi all, @Snashfacts added this comment into a reference, which isn't where comments should go. I have removed it so that the reference is fixed and instead will place the comment below.SamWilson989 (talk) 21:47, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment from previous edit
Talk:Long (finance)

message: I don't think this article is exactly a stub, it is more a definition that is potentially helpful in some other pages.  This material may well be covered better somewhere else but I've no idea how to find out.  Servalo 20:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should be re-rated now so I've removed the stub. Wyatt Tyrone Smith (talk) 17:53, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: (removed reference to :Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg, which is not used in this article Alan Davies (talk) 14:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Pyat rublei 1997.jpg

message: I corrected the definition of Long when referring to derivatives, as the definition stated that being long in a derivative implied that the holder profited if the value of the underlying instrument increases, which isn't true for the holder of a put option. Alan Davies (talk) 14:16, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning when referring to a derivative
Talk:Emi Wada

message: I plan to edit this article for the next few weeks by adding new information, reworking the overall structure of the article, and adjusting and revising some sentences for grammar and formatting. My plan for the new structure of the article is Lead, Early Life and Education, Career, Awards, and Reception. I think that this new structure would improve the article because it would present the information in a more organized and comprehensible way. After thoroughly researching her life, I intend to add information about Wada’s early childhood, her introduction in to costume design, and a complete list of her productions and awards (including awards she was nominated for). Currently, the article does not go into enough detail about her childhood and early career, only doing into detail during the later part of her career. Additionally, Wada was nominated for 13 awards and won 6 and worked on at least 21 productions, which is not accurately reflected in the article. I have compiled an annotated bibliography for the sources I plan to use for my edits, please feel free to take a look at them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emily_Misaki_YS/Emi_Wada/Bibliography. Around half of the sources are in Japanese, and because I can read Japanese I intend to translate those sources myself to use.Emily Misaki YS (talk) 15:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we get the exact city or town in which she was born?  Badagnani 20:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of birth

message: — Assignment last updated by Emily Misaki YS (talk) 13:20, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: WRIT 1150-26, Writing for Others
Talk:1324

message: This one seems to be a test, i'd like to suggest it for deletion whoever does it
Yupi666 20:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At the time you saw it, it had been vandalised. It's been fixed since.-gadfium 00:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Tom Gorman (umpire)

message: I had been requested to provide a citation for my quote from Mad Magazine. I have added the citation in the text of the article; but I'm still unclear about what to do about the "citation needed" notice. Dougie monty 07:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I took out the tag; if you have the volume and issue number, that would be useful also. MisfitToys 21:57, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mad magazine
Talk:Dick Higham

message: I think we got snuckered :) --Tom 00:07, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hello?!

message: 1882 - National League umpire Richard Higham became the only major league umpire ever expelled from the game after the League judged him guilty of collusion with gamblers. 
--Tom 14:25, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks for the timeline

message: He remains the only umpire to be forever disqualified from acting as such in any game of ball participated in by a National League Club. ..nothing is clearly stated in the official League minutes of a hearing held on the matter. Dick Higham never confessed to any wrongdoing and denied such accusations
--Tom 14:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article by Harold Higham
Talk:Orbital blowout fracture

message: My plan for the edits includes 1. Adding surgical emergencies 2. Adding pictures of different clinical sigs of diagnosis 3). Adding the guidelines for management 4. Adding materials available for surgical treatment 5.) adding followup management post operatively in depth 
I believe that this should probably be either labeled as a stub or moved and added to an existing article, such as a page about blunt trauma to the head or something, yes I do.
--TheChrisParker 21:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

message: It says the term was coined in 1957, citation provided is from 1987. I couldn't access the article, maybe it says they've been using the term since 57. Any comments?
--Clairemkelly (talk) 21:54, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date discrepancy? 

message: It really hurts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.79.181.12 (talk) 06:09, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Hurts
Talk:Ron Luciano

message: Reference 9 is a broken link. Here's another link that discusses his life and death that we might be able to use.
http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19950127&slug=2101697
EricEnfermero (talk) 07:03, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken Link 
Talk:Ilka Chase

message: I have commenced a Bibliography section:
* Cite templates will be used where possible.
* I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
* Links to potentially unreliable digitised copies may be removed. 
This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 10:46, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography