Talk:Władysław Gomułka

message: What does the article mean by "his name was partly cleared and his constructive contributions recognized." ? This is unclear to me.
I'm surprised that an article on such an important figure is still left a stub. I'm tempted to write a new article. 172 02:27, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why such a pity article

message: :The book I see (Polish Army, 1939-1945 by Steven J Zaloga) claims that he was a member of Polish resistance during the Nazi occupation (probably the GL one). How come it is ommitted? --Irpen 02:10, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am aware of your views. What I am saying is that he was a leader of the underground resistance AL which contributed to fighting the Nazi occupation. This is a notable fact and should be reflected in the article. --Irpen 03:33, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Soviet created government was in Moscow, Molobo. Gomulka was in Poland in the undergroung resistance. You ask me about Bandera at his talk. Don't bring off-topic stuff. --Irpen 04:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: His role in Polish resistance

message: I have brought over some information from the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 article, which more appropriately belongs here. We have been reviewing a large amount of reference material for that article, and I hope to be able to provide more references soon. Regards, Ryanjo 00:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  1956 events 

message: I think that the following should be rephrased:
He should be remembered as a Polish nationalist who betrayed the trust resulting from de-Stalinization and replaced it with personal, criminal dictatorship
Wikipedia. shouldn't encourage a certain political point of view. Tom Paine 18:03, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Points of view should be excluded 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:48, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:303 Plecarea spre tara a lui Wladislaw.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Xx234 (talk) 10:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the beginning of the article. What comes before is the lead section, which is now overly long, but it will be shortened after the material is completed in the specific subsections. For now it is needed as is because it has the information not yet specifically covered. Orczar (talk) 16:17, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the beginning (''early life'') is at the end? 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:06, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 

message: Gomulka's life is described twice, first as Life and career. Xx236 (talk) 07:43, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why twice? 

message: Legendery means probably fictional? The goal of Communists was total control and slave work.Xx236 (talk) 07:46, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Legendary'' trade unionist ?