lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nipple

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Trackdad. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 22#Trackdad until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Hog Farm  Talk 05:33, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Trackdad" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: I do not care if Wikipedia proclaims itself “not censored”. There is no reason or justification for a photo of a woman’s bare breast with nipple to be shown. It is not encyclopedic nor does Encyclopedia Britannia show any pornographic pictures in their articles. This is disgusting. 2600:1006:B0E8:7518:3C93:20B4:313E:E440 (talk) 17:17, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove Nipple Picture 

message: The first bullet point in Secondary sex characteristic#Females is
* Enlargement of breasts and erection of nipples.
The Nipple stimulation article mentions erect nipples several times.
I went to this article and was surprised the word "erect" never appears in it. This article mentions "stimulated as part of sexual arousal" but beyond that does not hint at what happens, nor why, beyond a couple of points in the Appearance section:
* Inverted nipples – This is normal if the nipples have always been indented inward and can easily point out when touched. If the nipples are pointing in and this is new, this is an unexpected change.
* Retracted nipples – The nipple was raised above the surface but changes, begins to pull inward, and does not come out when stimulated.
I had also thought that both male and female nipples become erect when exposed to cool or cold air. I don't think it's a medical class WP:RS but https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/weird-news/weird-reason-your-nipples-go-8870754 includes "The science behind our nipples responding to cold environments is well-known – our skin tightens and contracts during chilly weather, causing them to shrink and harden".
The mirror.co.uk article also has "Researchers at the Karolinska Institutet in Sweden have found that nipples have their very own "special nerve" that causes goose bumps and nipple erection."  The 
"special nerve" is claimed to be part of the Sympathetic nervous system. The Wikipedia article on Nipple does not mention the word "Sympathetic" and the Sympathetic nervous system article does not include any of "breast", "areola", nor "nipple."  This article includes the phase "special nerves" but links to Nerve rather than sympathetic nervous system.
I suspect we should have a section on the mechanism behind physical changes to nipples.--Marc Kupper|talk 20:30, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nipple erection and the sympathetic nervous system
Talk:Uranium

message: We reproduce a rounded figure here from the 2013 CIAAW report, but the 2000 report (https://www.ciaaw.org/pubs/EXER-2000.pdf) included a more precise figure before rounding. I tried to edit the underlying wikidata entry but do not see the changes reflected here. Anomalistic (talk) 16:53, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Atomic weight should be  238.028906 ±0.00027, not  238.02891 ±0.0003 

message: Gy Abeeb olasupo (talk) 19:56, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physics 

message: Which metal is used for containers that store radioactive sources? Answer in words not symbols. Abeeb olasupo (talk) 19:57, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Lead storage containers can be used to store and transport radioactive material. The standard outside and inside finishing is coated lead so there is no exposure to the lead by personnel. A stainless steel finishing is also available to provide a stronger housing. Rawsar6 (talk) 22:17, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Physics 

message: What is with the references being answer.com?  Seems cheesy and is rather indirect.
Uranium metal reacts with almost all non-metal elements (with the exception of the noble gases) and their compounds, with reactivity increasing with temperature.
As little as  of uranium-235 can be used to make an atomic bomb.
He named the newly discovered element after the planet Uranus (named after the primordial Greek god of the sky), which had been discovered eight years earlier by William Herschel.
--Smokefoot (talk) 17:54, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Answers.com?

message: urainum is found in most cheeses 86.13.252.226 (talk) 11:16, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:24, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 June 2023 

message: The final sentence in the first paragraph states that uranium can be eaten and is an extremely dense source of calories. This is patently false; uranium is toxic, the energy referred to here is the energy released upon fission and hence not usable by the human body, and the citation used says little if anything to support the statement. Please remove the sentence entirely. 82.0.251.175 (talk) 13:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: by ; thanks for pointing this out. Complex/Rational 13:39, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 December 2023 

message: In the article "Isotopes of uranium", i edited out an astonishing amount of unnecessary verbiage, particularly from the section "Uranium-234". Okay? Solomonfromfinland (talk) 05:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clutter
Talk:Alberto Ascari

message: Can someone explain to me what "internal favours" means in this context?  And how it would relate to stopping a race car?
:I think it was meant to say "internal failures". But the text was removed in November 2004 anyway. DH85868993 (talk) 09:27, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal Favors 

message: I have changed 'succession' to 'successive races' - I assume that was what was meant, rather than six progressively faster 'fastest laps' all in one race, as I took it to mean at first. MRacer (talk) 17:55, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fastest laps 

message: Forgive my ignorance, but how did Antonio win "13 championship Grand Prix" when he died in the first year of the World Manufacturers' Championship which appears to be the first 'Grand Prix' championship? He might very well have won 13 Grand Prix, but then Alberto probably won twenty five-plus without the championship qualifier (Wikipedia in general having a very one-eyed approach to non-championship GPs, sadly - for example, no mention is made of the form of Ascari in the Lancia early in 1955 at Turin, Pau and Naples). I can't see how these numbers are the same without some heavy juggling, though I'm open to correction Baron Von Joy (talk) 15:25, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the statement. I've also removed the statement that they both drove car number 26 - in those days car numbers changed from race to race, so the fact that they both drove a car number 26 during their career is mere coincidence. DH85868993 (talk) 10:38, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! It amazes me people need to reach when there are already enough uncanny coincidences. While I've heard it in several places elsewhere it'd be nice to pin down what event Antonio had an escape in four days before his death too... Baron Von Joy (talk) 19:35, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done a minor tarting up, largely tidying up a few paragraphs. There's some good nuggets in Racers about his father putting him in a car at an early age and his son's brief motorsport career I'll try to dig out at some point. Baron Von Joy (talk) 20:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antonio 
Talk:Lidsville

message: This article says that Hatty Town was a much later show, starting in 1980. It wasn’t  - it was virtually simultaneous with Lidsville, being made in 1969, and shown in 1970. The article that is linked to from the article page confirms this… Jock123 (talk) 10:58, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lidsville/ Hatty Town 

message: Near the end, the opening theme song suddendly changes from telling the orgin story to a happy dancing tune. Was there an extended version that may have only aired on the first broadcast?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.233.59.72 (talk) 23:56, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Theme Song

message: Hi, so I visited Comic Con in 2015 and in 2016 and I asked about the Lidsville movie and the Kroffts told me{ there are some articles confirming this on the internet} they aren't going to do a lidsville film, instead they are looking into updating lidsville as a tv show  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:642:4280:8EE0:6D9D:AC00:A790:CDF4 (talk) 18:45, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film is now becoming a television reboot 
Talk:Maureen Connolly

message: There is a paragraph starting "Tragedy struck again" without the article having said what the first tragedy was. I guess it is her horse accident in 1955, when she was only 19, leading to her never being able to play tennis again. Gmackematix (talk) 02:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I would certainly called her leg being crushed and not being able to play tennis a tragedy, so "tragedy struck again" sounds ok to me. Fyunck(click) (talk) 02:52, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless you have a source for that, it's WP:OR. News articles at the time of Connolly's death specify no specific cancer. Just that she had a operation for removal of a stomach tumor. That might mean stomach cancer except we all know cancer metastasizes and that could have been the case with Connolly....William 15:56, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tragedy struck again?

message: is shown in the mixed-doubles table with an American flag against his name. However, he was Australian.
78.147.225.71 (talk) 18:28, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: - yep, an error that's been there a long time. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:35, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Lew Hoad

message: It would be useful if this entry also had the timelines for doubles and mixed doubles and a records section to better appreciate the short but impressive career and achievements of Connolly. Antipodenz (talk) 04:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update to better compare with other greats
Talk:Nicholas Ridley (martyr)

message: Phrasing: [This is quoted in Acts and Monuments by John Foxe, who put the story of their deaths to effective use.] It is not, however, in the first edition of the book shows some unfortunate pro-catholic bias - the first edition od Foxe's is generally much worse substantiated by documents than the the following ones, which should be mentioned - the current wording somewhat implies the opposite.--87.249.145.69 (talk) 16:23, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel wording 
Talk:Crown (British coin)

message: I came looking for what a non-commemerative crown had been worth in L/s/d, and eventually found 5s after almost stopping reading, believing 5L would be the only value mentioned.  Could someone who understands the chronology better than i fix the chronology better than i have?--Jerzy•t 17:27 & 17:38, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Value?

message: Please see Talk:Queen's_Remembrancer#Crowns. Perhaps someone here can clarify this problem. 90.245.25.126 (talk) 04:25, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Queen's Remembrancer

message: It is obvious no satisfactory common ground or compromise can be reached. I have tried very hard, but breakdowns in mutual understanding just mean there is no possible solution beyond omitting it. TheCurrencyGuy (talk) 05:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion centralised at talk:Pound sterling#"Value =" in infoboxes for historic sterling coinage. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 15:03, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's just take out the "value" tag completely 

message: "Since the Great Recoinage of 1816, a crown has, as a general rule, had a diameter of 38.61 millimetres (1.520 in), and weighed 28.276 grams (defined as 10⁄11 troy ounce).[9][10]"
How much did it weigh before? I was googling for that, for the weight in 1650.
This is helpful for the value question. How much would that silver be worth at hte 2020 price of silver? 
editeur24 (talk) 13:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: While I do not have any pre-1662, hammered silver crowns at hand, I have just checked several milled ones dated from 1673/VICESIMO (Charles II second bust, SCBC 3357) to 1937 (George VI, SCBC 4078; last silver crown minted, even if only .500), all in VF+ to EF condition, and found all to be of similar shape, diameter and weight, viz. 1673: 37.4-37.8mm, 30.00g / 1819: 37.5mm, 28.16g / 1887: 38.3-38.6mm, 28.28g / 1937: 38.4-38.6mm / 28.32g (my last decimal digit always a bit dubious due to my limited equipment). At Sterling fineness (.925), used from the middle ages to 1919, 28.276g (10⁄11 troy ounce) equals 26.155g fine silver; at today's rate of USD 22.453 per fine oz silver, this amounts to USD 18.88; hope this helps. --HReuter (talk) 23:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Weight
Talk:Sauron

message: I know that there are a particularly huge number of taxa named after the character Sauron, but I find it a bit unfortunate that the most emblematic animal named after him, Sauroniops, which is nevertheless a large imposing dinosaur of the Carcharodontosauridae family, is not mentioned on this page. So you wouldn't mind if I inserted a slight paragraph regarding its taxonomy? Amirani1746 (talk) 18:00, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't quite see how a controversial genus of uncertain provenance can be most emblematic of anything except the difficulties of dinosaur taxonomy. It is already in List of things named after J. R. R. Tolkien and his works; I would leave it there. -- Verbarson  talkedits 20:56, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Absolutely. The list of taxa is enormous and growing, so the last thing we want to do is encourage people to add them all over the WikiProject. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''[[Sauroniops]]'' ?
Talk:Book of Common Prayer

message: Why does this article have multiple reference styles (footnotes and parenthetical)? Shouldn't there be just one format? I personally prefer footnotes because you can see all the citations at once without having to search for them through the article, but either way the current systems are confusing. Ltwin (talk) 01:18, 15 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference styles

message: The section on the 1549 BCP was getting long with multiple subsections, so I went ahead and split it off into a new article. It can be found at Book of Common Prayer (1549). Ltwin (talk) 08:43, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  BCP 1549 article 

message: This month, I want to construct a list containing as many versions of the Book of Common Prayer with as many versions with a proper image as well. Since I have access to about 20 different permutations, I would like help with this page to ensure its as comprehensive as possible. Besides the question of what the plural for BCP is ("Books of Common Prayer" or "Book of Common Prayers"), can anyone else list resources of where to find lists of prayer books? I intend to sort them by nationality. Thank you. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:12, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: List of BCPs

message: There is too much discussion of Books of Common Prayer of the Anglican Church in North America and other splinter groups that are outside the Anglican Communion in the section on the Book of Common Prayer in the United States. 69.114.98.242 (talk) 04:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: A single paragraph on a "splinter group" with a Sunday attendance roughly equivalent to the US Episcopal Church in a broad survey article isn't undue. ~ Pbritti (talk) 05:47, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splinter Books of Common Prayer 

message: Should the title (and other occurrences of the term) really be italicized? Surtsicna (talk) 18:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Per MOS:MAJORWORK, this could go either way. Since Book of Common Prayer can refer to a variety of books related to one another to differing extents (some belonging to the same series, some being periodic revisions of older versions, other being mostly independent works derived from completely different source material), it comes down to whether we believe the various BCPs fall under the exemption described in . Religious texts, according to the most generalist definition, encompasses liturgical books. However, the modifying adjective "revered" here seems to imply reference to texts of scriptural importance. As such, I vote that we italicize per the MOS. ~ Pbritti (talk) 20:34, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italicization 

message: It seems to me that "Modern Catholic adaptations" is a special case of "Religious influence" and the order of the two sections should be reversed? Thoughts? Jahaza (talk) 18:44, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. It should be a subsection of "Religious influence". Ltwin (talk) 20:09, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of Influence and Catholic Sections
Talk:Local homeomorphism

message: I haven't read the definition of local homeomorphism anywhere, but I would disagree with the definition given in the article: the first-coordinate inclusion R→R2 does not feel like a local homeomorphism to me.
Also, for a covering map one needs a bit more than just a surjective local homeomorphism. AxelBoldt 05:55 21 Jun 2003 (UTC)
You are certainly right. I rewrote the article: I think it looks a bit better now. Note that a surjective local homeomorphism between compact Hausdorff spaces is always a covering map but the converse fails, of course. --PST 20:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: AxelBoldt (talk) 21:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

text: AxelBoldt (talk) 21:03, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Eschscholzia californica

message: — Assignment last updated by Yayav (talk) 00:58, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History

message: Not sure https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eschscholzia_californica#cite_ref-16 (for Uses
California poppy leaves are used as food or garnish, while the seeds are used in cooking.)) is a valid source. 
It rates it edible: 1/5 and medicinal 3/5, which is insane W;ChangingUsername (talk) 11:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [16]
Talk:Remus Lupin

message: GabyIle (talk) 01:10, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone will add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 01:31, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 January 2021 

message: I would like for the name of Remus Lupin's son, Teddy Lupin, to be changed to: Edward "Teddy" Lupin. 2A00:23C8:A94:E900:40E5:6B0D:1208:D6FB (talk) 13:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:51, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 September 2021
Talk:Fhqwhgads

message: wikipedia
wikipedia owo  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.16.120.116 (talk) 03:14, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

message: On the hrwiki website, it states that Fhqwhgads origin is actually from the infamous "i love u" virus, spread to many computers through e-mail. The Fhqwhgads part of the message was the virus's code, and it is possible that the sender of this e-mail typed the code wrong, thus doing nothing to Strong Bad's already crappy computer.Ron3090 16:44, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The real origin

message: listed on votes for deletion. we're not a dictionary -- Tarquin 08:36 21 Jun 2003 (UTC)
:I redirected to Homestar Runner. cf xyzzy. Martin 14:47 21 Jun 2003 (UTC)
:: Sounds OK to me...let's just hope that people don't grouse that the H*R page is getting unwieldy now. Ed Cormany 16:56 21 Jun 2003 (UTC)
Not to be a scrooge, but this article's topic is pretty inane and trivial.  Mr. Billion 07:36, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Yes it is. But if it wasn't here, people would be trying to create it for the third time (counting the un-redirecting as a creation). -- Cyrius|✎ 16:48, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete it?

message: Sounds to me more like "fuh-hoog-mo-gads"; I definatly hear an "m" sound in there after a "g" when he pronounces it (usually listening to the Everybody To The Limit song). Does the pronunciation at the bottom match the one at the top? Kuronue 02:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When the robotic voice pronounces it, it does sound like "fuh-hoog-mo-gads", but Strong Bad pronounces it "fuh-hoo-kwuh-gads", especially at the end of a stanza where he says it "FUH-hoo-kwuh-gads". Excuse the HTML, but it seemed the easiest way for me to show the emphasis. — SheeEttin {T/C} 22:54, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: A Prod template was placed with the reason "Non-notable, no reliable sources, etc." I don't believe this is uncontentious and have suggested a merge instead. --Alksub 21:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old prod 

message: This is definitely a real word which I don’t know it’s meaning but it does exist and should be put in a dictionary 2A02:A45E:2991:1:5052:C4BE:5E59:D090 (talk) 21:42, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Realness of previously mentioned word “ fhqwhgads”
Talk:Richard III of England

message: Page has been vandalised. Does anyone have the correct dates/a cached page to restore it? Can this page be protected somehow? It's hardly an evolving topic 146.198.57.231 (talk) 06:51, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: View history. Which edits are you referring to? — Moops ⋠T⋡ 06:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Moops I can still see the article image as some misogynistic YouTuber Radical Larry 1 (talk) 07:05, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

text: @146.198.57.231 bumping this (If needed) whoever did this will 100% just do it again if it isn't locked Radical Larry 1 (talk) 07:03, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. I just reverted and warned, but yes. Good to protect this if its been persistent. TY — Moops ⋠T⋡ 07:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: DNA had proved his mother is his mother but it does not prove his father. 2600:4040:2525:B300:BDCC:926F:923B:6F50 (talk) 23:24, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: When a married woman conceives a child, that child is presumed a child of the husband unless otherwise proved; apart from that, there were no doubts raised of Richard’s being the duke of York’s son; apparently his colouring and build were the same as the duke’s. 79.51.184.168 (talk) 06:53, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is a late reply but there isn't much reason to doubt the father of Richard III. False paternity events are uncommon, about 1 to 2% of every birth. Statistically speaking it is more likely to have occurred some time in the ancestry of the current Duke of Beaufort simply because more generations have passed. Foxhound03 (talk) 14:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  We do not know who Richard lll's father was. 
Talk:Liar paradox

message: Irvine's proposed solution to the paradox is listed as a "non-cognitivist" solution. It's not clear why, though. I presume it is in reference to the cognitivist theory of ethics, but I'm not sure such a reference is appropriate. Maybe "non-truth-conditional" would be more appropriate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thrilway (talk • contribs) 15:28, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Non-cognitivist"?