Talk:List of mountain peaks of Mexico

message: The image :Image:Mx-nle.gif is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:18, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:Mx-nle.gif

message: Can anyone provide estimates of topographic prominence for the following summits?
*Cerro Ajusco
*Sierra Fría
*Cerro Tres Picos
*Cerro de San Miguel
Yours aye, Buaidh (talk) 14:39, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Prominence

message: Mount Signal, California, per its wikipedia article, is a community "named for Mount Signal, a summit about 5.5 miles (8.9 km) southwest, inside Mexico. It is also known as El Cerro Centinela, by the Mexicans, and Wi'Shspa, by the Kwapa: Cocopah people."
"Even though Mount Signal appears to be in the United States, it is actually located on the Mexican side of the border. If one would like to climb all 2,300 feet (700 m) to the top, one must do so from the Mexican side."  This beats s the criterion for this list-article, a 500m prominence.   So I think it should be added, if confirmation can be obtained.  It could be added as Mount Signal, Baja, or El Cerro Centinela or Mount Signal.
The Wikipedia article is not a valid source of the mountain's prominence, of course, but there's no particular reason to distrust it, either.  Does anyone else have sources that could report the elevation of this mountain?  Note the community is located below sea level, so the altitude of the mountain, plus a little, would be its "prominence". doncram 02:56, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, no it is a different location than i thought.  The topo map matches up to a point in the Google satellite view that is to the east.  Ruminosa is higher, on a mountain range that the road has to go over.  East of Ruminosa the same road just goes around Mount Signal, which is at  (my guess of which is the very highest point).  Oh, and Google labels it "El Centinela", i can see when i zoom in. --doncram 19:06, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Signal Mountain, Baja California

message: Adding Mount Signal / El Centinella to the table would knock off which one the two listed as >500m, if the table is limited to the top 30.  I say use 500m cutoff instead, and add also the 500m mountain mentioned in the text before the table. --doncram 19:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Use 30 as cutoff or 500m

message: There are a few mountains missing within the top 10:
* Sierra Negra (altitude 4580 m, prominence 540 m)
* Mount Tlaloc (altitude 4120 m, prominence 920 m)
The Telapón (see the Spanish article; altitude 4060 m) is sometimes included in a list of highest mountains. It has a prominence of only 400 m from Mount Tláloc, but cannot be accessed directly from there. It is most easily accessed from Río Frío or Llano Grande, from where it provides an elevation gain of over 850 metres.
--Bodofzt (talk) 23:37, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing mountains 

message: Ok, I added Sierra Negra, mount Tlaloc, Cerro El Rosario and El Pinal. But there are a few still missing (source):
* Cerro Las Derrumbadas, south peak (Puebla). Altitude: 3480 m. Prominence: ± 1000 m. Coordinates: 
* Cerro Las Derrumbadas, north peak (Puebla). Altitude: 3420 m. Prominence: 640 m. Coordinates: 
* Cerro Pinto (Puebla). Altitude: 3000 m. Prominence: 560 m. Coordinates: 
--Bodofzt (talk) 01:27, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions

message: * Jocotitlán (volcano) (State of Mexico). Altitude: 3910 m. Prominence: ± 1100 m. Coordinates: 
Sources: , ,  --Bodofzt (talk) 01:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: At least one more

message: * Cerro el Campanario (Michoacán). Altitude: 3640 m. Prominence: ± 1100 m. Coordinates:  (source)
* A few kilometers to the south, just over the border into the State of Mexico, there is also a prominent (± 700 m) peak of about 3560 m. It appears as having no name of its own, but a lesser summit of the same massif is called Cerro Pelón. See .
These two summits are probably ignored as they are within the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve and thus do (perhaps) not accept visitors. --Bodofzt (talk) 01:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: This keeps on giving!

message: Today I edited the article to include all the mountains listed above. I have been browsing topographic maps and found two more (source):
* Cerro Hilillo (Puebla). Altitude: 3140 m. Prominence: at least 550 m (to the west, connecting to the east end of the Tlaxco range). 
* Cerro Pizarro (Puebla). Altitude: 3080 m. Prominence: 660 m. 
The Tlaxco range is worth exploring in this respect. There might be some other prominent summits, for example around the towns of Cuatexmola and Tuligtic. --Bodofzt (talk) 01:37, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Two to go... at least