lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Benoît de Boigne

message: Fought in 1790 it featured an attack led by infantry columns against the old-style cavalry and unorganized infantry of the Rajputs.
Full description here: Battle of Merta —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 61.2.21.65 (talk) 01:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Battle of Merta 

message: I can't figure this out. It's given that Benoit was born in 1751 and her mother Helene Gabet was born in 1744. How's that possible?Kesangh (talk) 08:03, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Goof up

message: This article is loaded with weasel words and seems to be written by the subjet himself. This article doesn't provide any references except one. However, if someone is getting all the information from Britannica, then why would he/she visit Wikipedia? This article badly needs editing and a proper cleanup.Kesangh (talk) 11:42, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: As you can see from one of the discussions above, this article is a translation of the French article, which is fully sourced and a Featured Article on the French Wikipedia. Content guidlines differ over the various international versions of Wikipedia and I agree this one may need some work to conform to English Wikipedia standards. BarretBonden (talk) 14:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

text: This cannot have been written by the subject himself. He died in 1830. Hope you are aware that there was no wikipedia or internet when the subject was alive :) - Sahir 07:48, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: How imaginative?
Talk:Gallium(III) oxide

message: WIth over 12,000 reports on the topic, we are forced to mainly rely on more general sources, as guided by WP:SECONDARY. Four heavily cited reviews:
*Dai, Z. R., Pan, Z. W., Wang, Z. L., "Novel nanostructures of functional oxides synthesized by thermal evaporation", Adv. Funct. Mater. 2003, 13, 9. 10.1002/adfm.200390013
*Dumbaugh, W. H., Lapp, J. C., "Heavy-metal oxide glasses", J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1992, 75, 2315. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1992.tb05581.x
*Zhai, T., Fang, X., Liao, M., Xu, X., Zeng, H., Yoshio, B., Golberg, D., "A comprehensive review of one-dimensional metal-oxide nanostructure photodetectors", Sensors 2009, 9, 6504. 10.3390/s90806504
*Ohta, H., Nomura, K., Hiramatsu, H., Ueda, K., Kamiya, T., Hirano, M., Hosono, H., "Frontier of transparent oxide semiconductors", Solid-State Electron. 2003, 47, 2261. 10.1016/S0038-1101(03)00208-9 
--Smokefoot (talk) 18:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: 12,546 publications, patents, and reports and counting ... mentioning Ga2O3

message: Used in mercury-free thermometers to keep galistan from wetting the glass.  Or is that plain gallium oxide?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.165.88.158 (talk) 10:18, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial applications 
Talk:Gellan gum

message: To add to article: a photo. 76.189.141.37 (talk) 02:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Geosmin

message: Structural formula does not show stereochemistry, which is critical to correctly describe natural products.
AcidFlask 21:01, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a better image on Commons and replaced the current one with it. --Ed (Edgar181) 21:15, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs stereochemistry 

message: ... a.k.a. geosmin's odourless breakdown product. Structure is here if anyone wants to have a shufti. I'll draw it and add it to the article over the next few weeks since I have exams next week. Brammers (talk/c) 08:20, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Argosmin 

message: Surely it is heptahydronapthalene? I have emailed various institutions, I'll wait until I hear back to edit it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brocerius (talk • contribs) 11:37, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It was very relevant question, yet more if you meant decahydronaphthalene instead. I wonder what arguments did you get, except that name is from chemical databases and/or software generated. I bet I can then get you an counterargument. The organic nomenclature became self-inconsistent. Many trivial names were adopted, I wonder why decalin not. —Mykhal (talk) 09:40, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

text: .. well, OK, in this case there was oviously one "implicit (di)hydrogenation" because of the substitution at the naphthalene "condensation joint" carbons with no hydrogens. —Mykhal (talk) 09:58, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Octahydronapthalene?
Talk:Ahmo Hight

message: Although Hight has appeared in softcore erotic films, she is not considered a porn actress. Therefore notability critiera set out in WP:PORNBIO does not apply to this article. 23skidoo 17:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a porn star

message: Go ahead and delete this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Muhand (talk • contribs) 20:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't the correct place to vote for deletion of this article. You should go to the AFD discussion linked on the article page. 23skidoo 16:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Okay
Talk:Germanium dioxide

message: Nothing on hardness (Mohs, Knoop)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.79.227.209 (talk) 19:57, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Gibberellic acid

message: I've cut that is extremely harmful to organic substances, such as human tissue from the lead para. The MSDS data gives the rat oral LD50 for GA as 6300 mg kg-1, which to me doesn't indicate a particularly hazardous substance. Anyone know better? --Kay Dekker (talk) 20:33, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hazardous or not? 

message: I think the SMILES code is incorrect, as it doesn't properly render in ChemDraw (there's an issue with a double bond configuration). Anyone else? Harmonslide (talk) 16:37, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, when rendered in Jmol, I get a planar molecule, which it definitely is not:  https://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/jmol.php?model=O=C1O[C@@]52\C=C/[C@H](O)[C@]1([C@H]5[C@H](C(=O)O)[C@]43[C@H]2CC[C@@](O)(C(=C)\C3)C4)C   –Jérôme (talk) 08:22, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  The link shows wrong, but it's correct in the wikicode -- I don't know to insert a link that contains brackets. –Jérôme (talk) 08:23, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

text: Fixed. I think. I don't know the ref that was used to provide the SMILES that was there, but by eye, it was technically flawed. DMacks (talk) 06:45, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  SMILES code? 

message: Can someone please ask the wikipedia people to check the accuracy of the article, i dont know how to contact them. Please do this ASAP.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwertypranav123 (talk • contribs) 12:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy

message: "However, plants produce low amounts of GA3, therefore this hormone can be produced industrially by microorganisms."
This should be rewritten, I think.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by VonPalm (talk • contribs) 10:05, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause and effect 

message: This substance also is used to feminize cannabis seeds. (multiple sources, cannabis magazines, growers) Basvossen (talk) 23:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cannabis seed feminization
Talk:Gingerol

message: Isn't gingerol part of the phenylpropanoid metabolism? --kupirijo (talk) 23:02, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phenylpropanoid metabolism? 

message: The structures seem nearly unrelated upon inspection. 2600:1700:57AA:1910:C416:A80F:C5FB:5C3A (talk) 05:25, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is it a relative of piperine?
Talk:The Saxon Charm

message: All movie sources I could find spell Alma's last name "Wragg". but at 0:12:39 into the movie, Max Saxon spells it "Wragge".  Also, a November 1947 review of the source novel by Frederic Wakeman Sr. spells it "Wragge".  Accordingly, I have changed the spelling in the article.  BMJ-pdx (talk) 20:45, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wragge, not Wragg
Talk:Glucagon-like peptide-2

message: Can this entry be reclassified as a Biochemistry or a biomolecule rather than a chemistry stub?
While it is technicaly chemical in nature, so is everything. 
Also some references on the potential for use as adjuvant therapy in cancer would be valuable. 
DrWatson
83.144.242.122 (talk) 10:07, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Food Basics

message: This is not always true. The Food Basics I work at in Niagara Falls, Ontario is just "Food Basics", even though the person who the store is licensed to is named "George" Tyler Warren 06:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: x's Food Basics

message: The Company Info box should have a section on specialized products, currently some Food Basics stores have the following based upon demographics:
 * Clothing/Fashion
 * Pharmacy
 * Seafood
 * Kosher
Medic48 (talk) 05:13, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specialized Products 

message: I removed this section is it has no sources cited and read more like a customer complaint. --173.177.183.115 (talk) 13:14, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy Section
Talk:Glucose 1-phosphate

message: I note that the phosphate is rendered as having two negative charges in the illustration given. 
This would place it at a high pH, in fact so high that the remaining C-O bond in the C-O-P moiety would be very labile to hydrolysis--too labile for this structure to last for long.  I would recommend a rendering in which one of the other oxygens on the phosphate was protonated (i.e. ROP(O)OHO-), instead.
Showjumpersam (talk) 12:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Sultanpur, Uttar Pradesh

message: This category will act as starting category for grouping pages related to Sultanpur at one place and will also act as networking place to help improve pages related to Sultanpur. May be wikipedian can create a new user category e.g. Category:Sultanpur Wikipedians to collaborate more effectively. Vjdchauhan 17:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Effective and localized collaboration
Talk:Glucoside

message: Need article on Lauryl glucoside, which is used as a grease-cutting surfactant in liquid soaps. Badagnani (talk) 20:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need article 

message: This article does not mention uses of this class of chemical :-( .   Coco-glucoside is added to some shower gels, but I have no idea why. FreeFlow99 (talk) 09:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses 

message: A lot of the text in this article is copied from an 117 year old source and is comletely out of date. Episcophagus (talk) 18:02, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated information
Talk:Four Worlds

message: Whose Kabbalah?  From when?  Who says?  Sources, sources, sources!
I just redirected it from "Four Worlds (Kabbalah)" That page had no sources.--Jayrav 17:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources, folks! 
Talk:Glucuronic acid

message: The reaction formula on the page is very simplified, and not strictly correct. UDP-glucuron should be a substrate and UDP should be a product.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.160.88.119 (talk) 21:44, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Chemical formula

message: The structure given in the "information bar" on the right of the page is difference from the structure in the reaction scheme (the one in the reaction scheme has an extra CH2 linking to the carboxylic acid (CO2H) group. I think the structure at the top of the page is the correct one, but I'm not an expert in this area.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.44.1.174 (talk) 12:26, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You are indeed correct.  There is an error in :File:GlucuronidationBiphenylAmine.png.  I have replaced this diagram with a corrected version and nominated the incorrect one for deletion.  Thanks for catching the error and reporting it here.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:11, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure of Glucuronic Acid
Talk:Glycan

message: Based on comments above, and my limited interpretation, Polycsaccharide and Glycans seem sufficiently different concepts to each deserve their own article. Therefore I have deleted the suggestion that the articles be merged. Chimpex 00:25, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, I'd like to add a new section to the end of the article:
:Glycoscience
:A 2012 report from the U.S. National research Council calls for a new focus on glycoscience, a field that explores the structures and functions of glycans and promises great advances in areas as diverse as medicine, energy generation, and materials science.http://dels.nas.edu/Report/Transforming-Glycoscience-Roadmap/13446 Until now, glycans have received little attention from the research community due to a lack of tools to probe their often complex structures and properties.http://dels.nas.edu/Materials/Report-In-Brief/4292-Glycoscience The report presents a roadmap for transforming glycoscience from a field dominated by specialists to a widely studied and integrated discipline.
Any feedback would be great. Best wishes, Earlgrey101 (talk) 18:32, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose adding new secion

message: Proteoglycans have O-linked glycans attached to them. I propose that the proteoglycan subsection is moved under the O-linked glycan section. --kupirijo (talk) 08:30, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proteoglycans
Talk:Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate

message: The structure in the chembox is for the phosphonic acid, so is the IUPAC name. However, the phosphonic acid is not the conjugate base (phosphate) after which this article has been named. Editors need to decide if they want to name the chemical after the common name (the phosphate) or its neutral form (the acid). Most of the intermediate species in the glycolysis cycle have this issue, where the acid is conflated with the conjugate base. This type of technical issue, although seemingly pedantic, is often used by detractors to denigrate Wikipedia.--Chibibrain (talk) 03:32, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name and structure mismatch
Talk:Glyceride

message: What is the difference between the name glyceride and glyycerol? when is each one used?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Templemd (talk • contribs) 20:12, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Glycerol 3-phosphate

message: As far as I know, Glycerol-3-P is NOT a chemical intermediate in the glycolysis metabolic pathway, at least not significant enough to be stated in the first sentence of the main article. Glyceraldehyde-3-P is, though.   -- xy (talk) 04:44, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  confusion?? 

message: I am confused what is the difference between gylcerol 3-phosphate and glycerol 1-phosphate.  As the IUPAC name indicates the phosphate group gives the carbon it is attached to priority so it seems like the name should be glycerol 1-phosphate, and glycerol is symetrical so what is the distinction?  Also, I notice there is no page for glycerol 2-phosphate, or beta glycerol phosphate.  I was thinking it might make sense to include both in one page called "glycerol phosphate" if the two chemicals are not highly different, or even any other versions with multiple phosphate groups if relevant. Thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giftedlyarsenine (talk • contribs) 06:24, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I just tried to calculate the Molecular Weight and I get 162,0685 instead of 172,073 g/mol, as stated in the Article. I found no mistakes in my calculation:
m(C3H9O6P) = 3* m(c) + 9* m(H) + 6* m(O) + m(P)
= 3*12,011 + 9* 1,0075 + 6* 15,999 + 20,974
= 162,0685
Please verify.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.52.50.65 (talk) 11:27, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Molecular Weight, correct?
Talk:Glycidol

message: There's one, with the structure HO_|>O (also O<|_OH), although unstable. It's ethenol-oxide. (Note: I use simplified symbols, and don't use images, only in really crucial situations) Alfa-ketosav (talk) 19:55, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the simplest alcohol epoxide.
Talk:A Scandal in Bohemia

message: The article states that Godfrey Norton was a member of the Middle Temple, but my copy says it was the Inner Temple.  70.193.11.144 (talk) 00:42, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, and i just corrected it. You know, you could've been bold and edited the page yourself... ;-) -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 03:41, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous info? 

message: There is some very awkward wording in the first paragraph of the Plot Summary Section. Don't have a copy of the story on hand right now.
Zd9 (talk) 03:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird wording? 

message: I find it strange that there is no bibliographic information supplied for the first publication of this story. -- kosboot (talk) 18:55, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  bibliographic info 

message: Why is it uneditable ? MiniWiki32112 (talk) 17:10, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Please don't copy content from other websites. Also, please don't add protection templates unless the page is actually protected. I have left you a message on your talk page. NS-Merni (talk) 04:14, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unable to edit sub article ' Plot summary (Note mode)
Talk:Scream Pubs

message: In the aritcle it says "gone is the yellow from outside". Well the one in bangor (The Old Glan) was recently refurbished and repainted bright yellow. Its even known to everyone as "The Yellow".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.71.202.53 (talk) 21:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Do some Scream pubs have a "students only" policy? A couple of years ago I was turned away from a pub in Manchester because I couldn't produce a NUS card, but I can't recall whether it was a Scream pub or not. I thought at the time it was strange that I could drink in the students' union bar if I wanted to (using my Alumni union card), but couldn't drink in an independently owned pub! AdorableRuffian 17:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Students only?
Talk:Glyoxylic acid

message: The figure of the structure is missing a H atom at the O. Christian 19:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. --Ed (Edgar181) 19:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No new information was entered. Current information was not checked. Just paragraphing was done. -- Ktsquare (talk) 18:49, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just forgot the edit summary... entering here
Talk:Nutana Suburban Centre, Saskatoon

message: Hi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Saskatchewan WikiProject and WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods!  The Saskatchewan WikiProject is a fairly new WikiProject.  We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, to do with anything Saskatchewan.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project!
SriMesh | talk 03:58, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Invite

message: I advise against listing all the tenants of Market Mall. There's a WP:NOT rule somewhere that says we aren't supposed to be a business directory. A better idea might be instead to put in a paragraph or two on the history of the mall, since an attempt to create a separate article on the mall last year resulted in deletion. 23skidoo 17:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Market Mall detail

message: The main image needs to be replaced as it's now outdated. Suggest using the sign image at Market Mall (Saskatoon) as it's cropped to remove the now-defunct Zellers logo. That said, there's more to the NSC than the mall - the lead image should reflect the entire neighborhood, not just one aspect. An aerial view or a shot showing not just the mall but the residential towers behind it would be more appropriate. 68.146.70.124 (talk) 21:33, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Main image

message: In 2020-21 the City of Saskatoon renamed its "Suburban Centre" communities as "Urban Centre", so this neighbourhood is now Nutana Urban Centre (source). The following community articles will also need to be renamed as well:
* Lakewood Suburban Centre, Saskatoon
* University Heights Suburban Centre, Saskatoon
* Lawson Heights Suburban Centre, Saskatoon
* Confederation Suburban Centre, Saskatoon - on the linked map it just says "Confed" but I assume this is just an abbreviation
* Blairmore Suburban Centre, Saskatoon
70.73.90.119 (talk) 23:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming required for former Suburban Centre articles
Talk:Library technician

message: Talk: Library Technician as a library manager
I changed the statement back to the original version" In smaller libraries, where the foundations of organization and operation are already established, they may serve as the library manager." to avoid potential stigma on library technicians. While it is true that library technicians are often hired to subsitute librarians because of budgetary restrictions, it is not likely to be the only reason. By claiming that as the universal truth makes it sound like the library technicians, as a library manager, are the second-best choice. 
In fact, the library technicians do not only handle clerical works in the library. As paraprofessionals, library technicians are often put into the same category as clerks, but we are not clerks. In fact, people often forget that the existence of library assistant ( library worker who owns a B.A. but not library and information technician (LIT) diploma), circulation clerk ( staff who does not necessary receive formal training), and library technicians. Yet, there are slight differences between them. --Gerogia 17:54, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I can tell you have a background in library science; you're knowledgeable about the field. I was hoping to improve this article sometime and was wondering if you could help too, when/if you have time?, given your expertise. Thank you! :-) A Gate Through The Past 18:50, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:A Terrible Vengeance

message: When I came to this article, it had 6 or 7 tags, which I see as excessive.  It's flawed, but having too many tags tends to discourage fixes by overwhelming potential editors.  The basic issue is that the article is a mere plot summary, so I left that tag up.  The article does need context, but that's clearly implied by the "plot" tag, so there's no need to duplicate.  As for notability, it's a major story by a major historical writer.  Merely mentioning that it's a Gogol story is an establishment of notability, much as mentioning that a play was written by Shakespeare precludes any further need for notability-puffery. Mr. IP (talk) 04:26, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reduced the number of templates down to just one. Note that your opinion about notability is insufficient  evidence: reliable secondary sources are need to confirm your assertion. In Wikipedia, notability is not inherited, not even from the most famous authors. There should be lots of reliable secondary sources about this story that can be cited, so leave the cleanup template until these are added. --Gavin Collins (talk) 15:50, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag-stacking 

message: I restored the more complete (and likely over-long) synopsis that was trimmed by Special:Contributions/2600:1006:B02F:EE16:126:ED33:D5BE:3273 in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Terrible_Vengeance&oldid=652929583. The synopsis was indeed too long (and is again too long), but that trimming simply cut out portions without joining the remainder into a consistent whole, and it lost central moments, such as the moment at the end of the piece where the very land rises up against the sorcerer. We are better off with too much synopsis than with aggressive trimming that leaves an incoherent rump of a synopsis. I would like to take another crack at tightening the synopsis, but I'll have to re-read the piece first to do it well enough. Avram (talk) 06:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopsis