lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:History of Dalmatia

message: VVVladimir, if several different editors disagree with you, there is an obvious explanation which is much more likely than the notion that you are protecting the Truth against tag-teaming. Please stop. bobrayner (talk) 00:05, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: What are you talking about? I've been following this for the past three days and I don't see any explanation or discussion (and thus no consensus) for removal of such large portions of the article. Care to explain yourself? Shokatz (talk) 01:14, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, bobrayner, would you please explain to us why do you insist on removing those parts of the article, including several whole sections? They were deleted three days ago without explanation by a newly created account, and when the text was restored by an experienced editor, you undid his edit with the summery "not an improvement". So, how was the article improved by those deletions? Vladimir (talk) 17:55, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

text: bob, I came this -><- close to blocking you now. This is simply improper, and you and everyone else editing in the WP:ARBMAC topic area should know better. This was plain censorship by what appears to be a disposable WP:SPA - reinstating those edits without so much as a useful edit summary is a clear violation of decorum. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 17:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editwarring 

message: Please refrain from using 15-18th century and especially 15-17th century maps which are erroneously showing how Venice Republic had governorship and control over whole region of modern Dalmatia - it did NOT neither in its full extent of power which came in the 18th century. Especially not in the 15th and 16ht century, when most part of Dalmatia was under Ottoman Empire control and governorship, and prior to that under Hungarian Kingdom. Venetian Dalmatia mainly included only the very coastal part of Dalmatia with very near hinterland while the majority of the Dalmatian hinterland was not Venetian at all. Miki Filigranski (talk) 10:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps of Venetian Dalmatia
Talk:Tijuana International Airport

message: Actually, the runway of the Tijuana "Abelardo L. Rodríguez" Airport runs (east-west) paralell to the U. S. Mexican border fence and is at least 100 meters south of it. The approach to the runway is either from the East (normally) or from the West (when Santa Ana wind conditions exist). Either way, airplanes do not have to clear the U. S. - Mexico border fence in order to land! So I will remove that wrong statement from the article.
Hasn't there been any cases of airplanes clearing the border? IFCM (talk) 04:19, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You answered your own question. Geneva airport terminals are both on Swiss soil. Basel airport terminals are all on French soil. Tijuana airport has one terminal in Mexico and another on United States soil. Keizers (talk) 21:57, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—107.77.75.116 (talk) 22:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do you think there's anything wrong? HkCaGu (talk) 00:45, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

text: Google Maps finds it just fine.  Untagged. --Wtshymanski (talk) 15:39, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 
Talk:Manalapan High School

message: Mike Iacono, an 03 alumni, made headlines nationwide recently when he single handedly rounded up and delivered to the CIA four members of Al Queda.
Then why do I see no Google hits for "'mike iacono' cia" or "'mike iacono' al qaeda"? The same goes for this "Ken[neth] Widmer"  .Rmky87 20:33, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Hurricane Katrina effects by region

message: This article is seriously out of date. I added . --Coredesat 02:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 
Talk:Carl Nieroth

message: Nordisk familjebok states the place of death as "Pärnå socken". Is this Perno in Turku or Perniö? -- Petri Krohn 03:32, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of death? 

message: Svensk Biografiskt Lexikon gives his name as Carl Nieroth. I have also checked military records from the time and he is also called Carl Nieroth there. I will move this article to Carl Nieroth if no-one can come up with sources that give the current name. Närking (talk) 08:05, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: Karl instead of Carl seems a popular variant in spelling of his first name. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  19:52, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Svenskt Biografiskt Lexikon from 1989 has Carl Nieroth and in contemporary records he is called the same. Närking (talk) 20:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carl Nieroth
Talk:List of philosophies

message: Added a number of prominent philosophies that had been excluded from the list. (How could anyone forget ontology and metaethics?)  The Way 20:46, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: I hesitate to start this argument, but this list currently includes at least four different kinds of thing:
* particular sub-disciplines of academic philosophy - metaethics, philosophy of art
* philosophical, ideological or religious positions - Marxism, Jainism, philosophical satanism
* national traditions of thought - Czech philosophy, Korean philosophy
* particular issues, mostly within academic philosophy - property dualism, qualia
I'm unsure that this makes for a useful list. Any thoughts, anyone?
Cheers,--Sam Clark 15:12, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Criteria for inclusion

message: Would think in this list, Philosophy of war ought to go under W, Philosophy of eating under E, and such. Hyperbolick (talk) 04:50, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  All those “Philosophy of”
Talk:WHA (AM)

message: A lot of  links to WHA are hockey related to the World Hockey Association, perhaps WHA should be a disamb pageSmith03 20:51, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

message: I do know that translator W300BM (107.9 FM) in Madison at one time relayed WHAD. That was when the FCC didn't allow AM stations to feed translators (they do now). I just happened to be listening to WHA last week, and they ID'ed the translator as theirs at the top of the hour. Guess that settles it.--Fightingirish (talk) 01:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Translator update
Talk:Interstate 29

message: I have de-stubbed this article.  Review of the Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Assessment guidelines clearly shows Interstate 29 is start class not stub class as it not only contains a particularly useful picture or graphic it also has multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic and multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article having three of the four puts it border line on being B class per Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a completed article. So it is at or close to two levels above stub.   Jeepday (talk) 01:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not a good idea, merge into state routing articles instead. This will make the article too long. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 17:57, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the exit list would be longer than the rest of the article. Should we create the state subpages? Metallic95   User Page | Talk 02:40, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 05:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge??

message: Added information about speed cameras in Iowa. Note that there are only three U.S. cities that have speed cameras on Interstate Highways -- Sioux City is one. This is a distinctive aspect that should be of interest. As the content shows it is also a source of friction between the states of Iowa and South Dakota. I am reverting the deletion. Please discuss on the talk page to get a concensus before removing this again.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.217.216.63 (talk) 14:37, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iowa 

message: Shouldn't we add Kansas City, Omaha, and Sioux City on the list of cities?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hraines46 (talk • contribs) 20:53, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Metropolitan Areas  

message: The kml file lines start correctly, with a -94 longitude. The rest have no minus sign and thus display somewhere in mid-Asia. 2603:7080:102:2B11:D523:AC21:FDE4:A020 (talk) 23:45, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. –Fredddie™ 00:09, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  KML file
Talk:Britannia (coin)

message: Weight/mass info for the silver Britannias seems wrong. eg £2 is 32.454g (1 troy oz (31.102g) of Silver + about 4% Copper) Rod57 (talk) 14:16, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

message: but what to call them ? Britannia (gold coin) ? - Rod57 (talk) 08:49, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split page into gold and silver Britannias 

message: I think there are two sets of 2023 Britannias. Ones with the Queen are already for sale and ones with King Charles III on the obverse (and marked 2023) are coming soon. tharsaile (talk) 14:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  King Charles?
Talk:Islands

message: :Did you mean to type Talk:Island?
Many articles link to this page, "islands" (plural), though they should be linking to "island" (singular).  Their wiki-markup must be changed from: islands to: islands, such that the link goes to "island", while the word displayed is "islands".
Look here for a list of these articles... they must eventually be corrected.
Special:Whatlinkshere/Islands
Note that there may be a few that link to "Islands", though they should be linking to, for example, Islands (1987 album), as was (until I fixed it) the case of the Bonnie Tyler article.
-- Alexbatko, Wed Aug 31 13:53:18 EDT 2005
The band that was occupying the page here, before I turned it into a redirect, had not yet performed live nor released an album. That is well below the notability criteria for bands. Please do not change this article to be about the band unless you can supply additional information to indicate that it is in fact notable. 
If some other usage for 'islands' is found to be necessary can I suggest making it link from Island (disambiguation). 
DJ Clayworth 20:58, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Perfect rationality

message: I am seeking comments regarding whether this article is necessary or if it should redirect to homo economicus.  Please comment here.  Thanks! --best, kevin  ···Kzollman | Talk··· 21:19, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
I lean towards making a redirect to homo economicus, at least until there's a big enough section in that article to split out a reasonably-sized article on perfect rationality.
--DavidCary 09:36, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at wikiproject 
Talk:List of Naruto episodes

message: The Crunchyroll and Netflix page says the series has 9 seasons. But here in Wikipedia it says that it has 5 seasons.— Bradford 💬 17:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the Japanese release came we organized the seasons like that just like Shippuden's seasons. Whether or not it should be reorganized might require a discussion. Then again, we ended up dividing other series like D.Gray-man for English release rather than Japanese.Tintor2 (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: But then, everything should be divided into nine seasons. Because it is very confusing. In fact, this page does not say that the series is divided by seasons.— Bradford 💬 21:27, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

text: It was due to the DVD visions if I remember well. Shippuden also divided seasons per DVDs giving each a title but for some reason Boruto doesn't.Tintor2 (talk) 22:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  5 seasons or 9? 

message: Wouldn't it be better to divide everything by arcs? For example:
* Naruto: Prologue – Land of Waves Escort Mission
* Naruto: Chūnin Exams
It would be better, because this is very confusing. Crunchyroll says the series has 9 seasons, Netflix too. His DVD releases by VizMedia says they are 4 seasons.--Elefv (talk) 12:25, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the best thing is to separate by seasons, as VizMedia says.— Bradford 💬 22:36, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Official marketing division makest it easier division. However, since this is the English Wikipedia, I think we might need to rearrange them in a certain official English division.Tintor2 (talk) 13:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Might suggess a talk here in case you aim to rearraange it.Tintor2 (talk) 14:19, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seasons 

message: sunny side battle 1.38.152.13 (talk) 17:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunny side  battle
Talk:Rail transport in Sweden

message: I want to make the main editor of this page (user:Alarm) aware of the fact that many pages indeed link to this page, via redirects such as Norra Stambanan) , so it is indeed essential to expand the page. Fred-Chess 21:14, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
The current map is quite completley wrong. It should be modified, or deleted. Reasons: 1)None of the private-built main lines (BJ/GDG, SWB, TGOJ, West Coast main line or HNJ) are inserted. 2) The map is showing a) the Inland Railway line, which never was very important outside politics and rhetorics of politicians, and b) the two original SJ-lines in the south (finished 1862...) and the Northen main line (finished 1894(?)) Ther were some other main developement after that period...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.227.207.247 (talk) 17:47, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

message: "Total: 12,821 km (includes 3,594 km of privately owned railways) 
standard gauge: 12,821 km 1.435 m gauge (7,918 km electrified and 1,152 km double track) (1998) 
narrow gauge: 221 km 0.891-m gauge (2001)"
Shouldn't the 221 km of narrow gauge be included in the total 12,821 km? Or should 221 km be subtracted from the 12,821 km of standard gauge?
85.231.217.245 18:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Total length

message: I would like to suggest a new section about the collapse/chaos
of the railway that has been in effect the past couple of days
as a  result of a very intense snowstorm.
The Railway traffic in the southern half of the country came to
a total stop because of malfunctioning levers, malfunctioning trains,
oversnowed rails and etc.
So how do we put this into the article in a good way?
What/how many sources to use?
What is the best word/headline to describe it?
references:
http://www.thelocal.se/25152/20100223/ 
http://www.aftonbladet.se/ 
http://www.expressen.se/
http://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/fortsatt-kaos-i-tagtrafiken-1.1050252 
http://svt.se/2.22620/1.1901184/fortsatt_kaos_i_tagtrafiken 
http://www.nyhetskanalen.se/ 
//Theblacksmith99 (talk) 13:21, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 2010 collapse

message: proposed Swedish broad gauge (not ever built)
:English measurement: 1,778 mm (5 ft 10 in)
:Metric measurement: 1,780 mm (5 ft 10 in)
:Swedish measurement: 1,782 mm (5 ft 10 in)
121.102.47.39 (talk) 05:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Proposed, where, when, by whom? Sources? --BIL (talk) 20:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  5 ft 10 in gauge 

message: Reindeer need some iron in their diet, and what better place to find it are rail tracks which general fine flakes as the wheels of the train wear on the steel rails. Brake blocks can also generate fine iron powder. Since reindeer on tracks can cause accidents, some method of decoy iron is needed to keep the animals away from the rail lines. See Licking problem Wimbledon32 (talk) 04:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reindeer problem
Talk:Elizabeth Stuart, Queen of Bohemia

message: I corrected the main article to be Falkland Palace rather than Dunfermline Palace, to agree with the info box on the right ref: www.britannica.com/biography/Elizabeth-Stuart 153.98.68.196 (talk) 13:30, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong place of birth 

message: In German, adjectives are inflected. While "englischer Bau" is the citation form (used in isolation), the 
context in this article requires
:creating between 1610 and 1613 the "Englischen Bau" (i.e. English Building) for her
at least from a German viewpoint.
Helmut w.k. (talk) 14:34, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Englischer Bau 

message: I wonder if a woman can actually be called an electress though she has nothing whatever to do with electing.  She merely happens to be married to a guy who has the theoretical right to do some electing.  In the case of Elizabeth, of course, her husband never did any electing either.--dunnhaupt (talk) 15:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Electress?"

message: are the children of king James and the siblings of Elizabeth Stuart. Adelfrank (talk) 14:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children in the info-box
Talk:Ralph Abernathy

message: While I'm sure some would see it as a badge of honor, couldn't anyone find something other than a mug shot for his photo?
: There wasn't a photo there at all a few days ago. Ah, well, you have a point, I guess. Here goes. AnonEMouse 16:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: Searching "Ralph David Abernathy" redirects to this page.  This page is about his father, Ralph Abernathy.  The top of the page also says "Ralph David Abernathy".  Which is it?  This needs to be fixed and clarified...
65.104.203.83 (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ralph vs. Ralph David 

message: The tone in the section on civil rights work is not written encyclopedically. It is written like a speech, with excessive analogies, paralellism, and loaded language. Instead of paraphrasing Abernathy's talking points with his own achievements, the article should include more quotes as well as citations (as has been mentioned).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.63.107.83 (talk) 19:12, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree. While I think that Abernathy was a very important person who did a massive amount to improve the world, I still think that the article should have a much more neutral tone and allow the facts to speak for themselves. When reading through the article, I was shocked by the intensity with which that section (which contains a grand total of 1 citations) feels as though it's praising Abernathy. I went through the revision history to see how it got that way, and found that it was mainly done over a handful of edits in 2009 by an anonymous editor (76.214.17.104) whose only contributions are to this page. While it feels ridiculous to criticize bias in favor of civil rights, I still do think that this kind of tone should be avoided. I've added a "tone" tag to that section, and I've begun trying to make it more neutral, partly by reincorporating passages deleted years ago by that editor. BreakfastJr (talk) 10:37, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone 
Talk:Internet Mail 2000

message: Although it is not implemented yet as a common protocol, its logic is used on timeline of social networks: the message is stored on the timeline of user, that can be viewed by/shared to final destination.Kokbira (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

message: In the Google TechTalk, Meng and Julian mention that  is their working implementation of the internet mail 2000. This link should probably be mentioned in the article. Inmatarian 21:25, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  StubMail implementation 
Talk:List of archaeological periods (Levant)

message: The list of archeological periods not quite correct in the modern period (previous periods seems fine to me) as it concentrates purely on Middle East region. Apparently that is due to the origins of the list, but still it would be preferable to include different periods in other areas (in Europe late antiquity, early/middle/late medieval, renessaince... that sort of stuff) in order make a complete list. Unfortunately I do not have sufficient knowledge of the periods, the time they cover, and especially other areas than Europe (China and other Asia definitely needs to be on the list). Hopefully somebody could improve the list... Prantasa 13:02, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This list is based pretty much verbatim from the reference listed.  If you would like to change the list, please find an alternate reference as a starting point.  Then we can talk about what the best approach might be to address two differing sources. - Bantman 07:28, 14 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: this is very juisy chronology, go ahead and change it. Nasz 09:48, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern period needs reworking 

message: I have mocked up a start for an overall "Periods" article in tabular and index form in 
Talk:List of archaeological periods/temp. Please have a look and see if this provides a better structure to fit in the variety that is Regional Archeaological periods. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page) 11:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revised structure proposal

message: I have renamed and restructured these articles - so we now have a formal Levantive article, North American article and a start of one for Mesoamerica. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page) 12:44, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[List of archaeological periods]]
Talk:Girlfriend experience

message: Clearly the article started off as an article about specific, specialized forms of GFE in the US and even more specifically in Nevada, the only place where it's legal in the US. Based on about 2-3 sources. Despite this, it makes broad generalizations that don't really acknowledge this, and then a couple of tacked on sentences about "southeast Asia" and Thailand is suppposed to somehow balance it out into a real article about GFE? ZarhanFastfire (talk) 23:35, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've grouped some of the material into a "North America" section. -- Polly Tunnel (talk) 10:24, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

text: I've attempted to remedy the problems with this line. -- Polly Tunnel (talk) 10:41, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Article is a mess