lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Rex071404 4/Proposed decision

message: Clarification please: do article bans such as these include the talk pages of the articles? --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 04:59, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Only if the ban states so explicitly.  Kelly Martin (talk) 05:06, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Princeton offense

message: the external link is broken i think
I've removed the broken link.  You obviously took the effort to leave a comment about it - about the same amount of work as removing/fixing the link yourself.  Please consider doing this next time to save everyone the time yEvb0 16:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Insufficient discussion of the offense's use in the NBA.  In the 2001-02 season, two of the four teams that made the conference finals were running the Princeton offense: Sacramento under Rick Adelman, where Carril was an asst coach, and New Jersey under Byron Scott, where Eddie Jordan was an asst.  Carril has been coaching in the NBA for over a dozen years now, since his retirement from Princeton.  
Also: Where do we get the information that the Swing offense is a variant of the Princeton?   Is it accurate?  Seems absurd.  Bo Ryan doesn't have any ties to Princeton.  He coached for many years in Wisconsin, basically the same years as the Carril's offense was achieving noteriety; so when would he have learned it?  And finally, I have a video of Bo Ryan teaching the Swing offense.  It's a continuity offense: it doesn't look anything like the Princeton.  It doesn't feature the back-door cuts and it doesn't emphasize ball-handling by all members of the team and it doesn't emphasize 3pt shooting.  Doesn't use Carril's dribble handoffs, either.  It's much more of a screening offense. 
Jim Hardy (talk) 04:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Use

message: I'm not an authority on women's athletics, but I speculate that there are examples of women's teams which use the Princeton offense effectively.  Currently, there are roughly 37 male coaches listed.  Are they all for men's basketball teams? Gprobins (talk) 14:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples from Women's Basketball?
Talk:Self-hating Jew

message: Querendo traduzir a página em questão ou esta fique a vontade. att 2804:14C:5BB3:A319:78A5:7717:F023:7BA9 (talk) 14:13, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The above should be in English. It seems to be in Portuguese.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5t34ljg76 (talk • contribs) 11:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{Ping|Luizpuodzius}} 

message: Sadly the article is missing the Haaretz definition to the detest some Jews have and had for ultra-orthodox Jews and their beliefs.פשוט pashute ♫ (talk) 10:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Haaretz definition 

message: perceptions are subjective not objective. The very first line is misleading and borderline propaganda. 2601:1C0:CA00:A1D0:D479:EEAE:304C:F228 (talk) 21:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted. Zerotalk 00:16, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oxymoron
Talk:George Matheson Murray

message: I was looking up the '52 election to find out where Ma had run and came across a George Murray candidate in the Yale riding; I'm not sure if this is "our George" and will have to check the bio.  In the meantime here are the results of that race, if they need to be added to this one.
(preferential ballot; first column is first count, last column is 4th count of 4)
*Cherry, Bernard (Ben) 	        PC 	338 	10.74 	- 	-
*CORBETT, Irvine Finlay 	        BCSCL 	1,024 	32.53 	1,390 	51.46
*Gillis, John Joseph Alban 	LIB. 	1,067 	33.89 	1,311 	48.54
*MacIsaac, Angus Hugh 	        CCF 	659 	20.93 	- 	-
*Murray, George 	                IND. 	60 	1.91 	- 	-
*Counts 4 	
*Rejected ballots 98 	
*TOTAL 	  	  	3,148 	  	2,701 	
NB if that is George Matheson Murray it's an abysmal turnout; and may reflect the result/impact of Margaret's candidacy elsewhere.Skookum1; but similar to his less-than-100 votes in 1941, which was during the mine strike 05:06, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible run in Yale riding
Talk:Scottie Upshall

message: The file :File:Scottie Upshall.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Scottie Upshall.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 01:10, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Scottie Upshall.jpg]]
Talk:Theoria (Eastern Orthodox Christianity)

message: The extensive word-for-word quoting from Romanides (and others) is surely a violation of copyright: "Copying material without the permission of the copyright holder from sources that are not public domain or compatibly licensed (unless it's a brief quotation used in accordance with Wikipedia's non-free content policy and guideline) is likely to be a copyright violation. Even inserting text copied with some changes can be a copyright violation if there's substantial linguistic similarity in creative language or structure (this can also raise problems of plagiarism). Such a situation should be treated seriously, as copyright violations not only harm Wikipedia's redistributability, but also create legal issues" (WP:CV).
"If you suspect a copyright violation but are uncertain if the content is copyrighted or whether the external site is copying from Wikipedia, you should at least bring up the issue on that page's discussion page, if it is active. In that case, please tag the page , unless your concerns are swiftly resolved. Others can then examine the situation and take action if needed. ... You may also make a note of your concerns at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems" (WP:CV emphases added).
Perhaps the editor who inserted this extensive material will give an explanation that will show that the suggested further action is not necessary.  Or perhaps someone else can give advice.  Esoglou (talk) 08:49, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: Aren't Theoria and Christian contemplation the same topic? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:26, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Add :Hesychasm. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same topic? 

message: I've moved the content to Christian contemplation; it's the same topic. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved to [[Christian contemplation]]
Talk:Desolation Wilderness

message: As of today, the article says that the Desolation Wilderness is "just southwest of Lake Tahoe." But is "southwest" correct? If you take into account the whole area, it is west of Lake Tahoe, not southwest. 69.165.53.151 (talk) 18:35, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Location?

message: * Boomerang Lake
* Clyde Lake
* Cup Lake
* Dicks Lake
* Fontanillis Lake
* Forni Lake
* Gertrude Lake
* Gilmore Lake
* Grouse Lake
* Half Moon Lake
* Island Lake
* Maud Lake
* Snow Lake
* Susie Lake
* Twin Lakes
* Tyler Lake
* Velma Lakes (Lower, Middle and Upper)
Justin (talk) 22:12, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old lakes list
Talk:Mitsuteru Yokoyama

message: Link is broken. skewetoo 05:38, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Venus Wars

message: I took care of this article that was requested more than a year ago. It needs some expansion. Hopefully this helps. Gadster 05:41, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:Articles requested for more than a year 

message: If I can name one vehicle that has caught my eye and my interest in Venus Wars, it was the "Admiral."
So far I've only found some concept artwork for the Admiral. I really wonder what the Technical Specifications for this mechanical monster are.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v43/Luigi/venuswars009.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v43/Luigi/venuswars010.jpg
--Arima 23:40, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ishtar Army Super-Dreadnought "Admiral" 

message: I saw the old Manga Entertainment VHS (probably the British edition), and in the early strip search scene, the animation is pretty blurred. Of course, it's a pretty speculative scene, but 80's Action Anime seldom shied away from nudity, so I wonder whether this was any local censorship to obtain a PG rating, or something(?) On the other hand, Manga Entertainment released fare such as Urotsukidoji, Akira and Ghost in the Shell, anyway, so it feels a bit weird that they would have this particular film censored. 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 11:40, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Blurred nudity
Talk:Dolly Sods Wilderness

message: Historical photos from when it was logged, showing large trees, loggers, etc... These must exist in State archives that would be allowed to be used here... Someone with the ability to get at those should make an attempt. It would greatly enrich this article. Raeky (talk) 19:04, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Photos 
Talk:John Tonelli

message: The last paragraph and a chunk of the second-last paragraph would appear to have been copied and pasted from the Legends of Hockey homepage: http://www.legendsofhockey.net:8080/LegendsOfHockey/jsp/SearchPlayer.jsp?player=11649.  Not sure if it's appropriate to just remove the paragraphs and request that they be re-written, or what - I'm not up to editing them myself. Kraigus 22:22, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Luxembourg Palace

message: There can't be any gain in comprehension or context by separating the Palace from Luxembourg Garden. Would anyone object to the merge? --Wetman 06:05, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I object and have removed the notice - see the garden's talk page. CalJW 20:16, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggested merge

message: I'm not sure how to edit the page correctly, so I would rather leave it to someone who can.
This article says that the palace was not used from 1694 untill 1778, this is not true.
Between 1750 and 1778 it was open to of the week to the public as an art museum, it contained many paintings
and fine objects. 
This information can be cited in the article 'The musée du Louvre as Revolutionary Metaphor during the Terror' by Andrew L. McClellan.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.45.244 (talk) 14:59, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and added this information, with the source. --Stomme (talk) 07:56, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong information 

message: Hi. I have recently uploaded another image of the palace to Commons, which has just been promoted to FP. 
 I am wondering if it might be preferable for this article, since it treats the palace itself, with more even lighting, and not the garden. While the current photo is certainly very nice, I do not think that it is ideal for readers to gain a good overview of the building, as it shows the palace from a slight angle and with several other subjects in the foreground. Are there any opinions concerning the subject here? --DXR (talk) 13:28, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Wikipedia talk:Notice board for Pakistan-related topics

message: Would anyone from this project like to take a look at Zahid Hafeez Chaudhri to assess notability? --Crosji (talk) 06:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zahid Hafeez Chaudhri 

message: Cable 1971 do not seems to have any notability, with poor evidence for it's existence. Can someone from this project look at it to assess it.  Pheeca93 (talk) 20:10, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cable 1971
Talk:Dodge Daytona

message: I think this page should only focus on the 1980s Daytona, since the 1960s and 1970s versions were modified Chargers, while the 1980s Daytona was a model of its own. --ApolloBoy 06:33, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm... 

message: This article is so messy and I agree with the previous post it should focus on 1980's Dayotna. But it should include the history of the name so the reader know the background of the name.
Charger/RAM Based Daytona should have its own article or moved to their own article.
:Done. I hope this page will do! --ApolloBoy 03:08, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a mess 

message: The article mentions both Chrysler Laser and Chrysler Lazer, I suppose that only one is correct? It is said « the new Plymouth Laser (at this point with a shift in spelling from 'Lazer' to 'Laser') » but there are mentions of Chrysler Laser too... Or did they continue to produce a Chrysler version at that time? Anyway it is strange to have Laser in the first part of the article, then Lazer further, only explained briefly later.
Antp 11:13, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lazer/Laser 

message: Quote: "Optional on Iroc was the 2.5l "High Torque" Turbo, available as a very rare option (less than 230 produced). "
-> Source? imho the only turbo engine available on the 92 daytonas other than the 2.2 T-III actually was the 2.5 T-I HighTorque rated at 152hp/210lbft, so any 2.5 Turbo in a 92 is a HighTorque? at least those rated at 152hp with the 5speed are HT's, but there are rumours about variations (150hp/190-ish lbft) for the automatic equipped ones.
Renizer (talk) 20:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2.5 T-I High Torque 
Talk:Emigrant Wilderness

message: At first glance, the term "emigrants" seems unusual, as it implies that the parties crossing through this area were not "immigrants" to the United States but rather people leaving the US. This was in fact the case, as the related article "Emigrant Pass" points out, explaining that "pioneers, heading west, emigrated from the United States to California, which was part of Mexico until it was captured by the United States in the Mexican–American War (1846–1848)". May I suggest adding that useful explanation to this article? 92.79.101.164 (talk) 08:28, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why "Emigrants"?
Talk:Lawrence Tibbett

message: In the article one reads: Together with violinist Jascha Heifetz, in 1936 he founded the American Guild of Musical Artists, the most important labor union for solo performing artists. He was the Guild's proactive president for 17 years. 
What on earth is a "proactive" president?  Is it better than an active president?
Abenr (talk) 16:28, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proactive President 
Talk:Fulfillingness' First Finale

message: I am a big fan but Stevie's drumming on Creepin' is absolutely atrocious and I know for a fact he could afford a drummer. It spoils the track so much. Thank heavens he had a proper band on Songs in The Key Of Life . Paul210 09:36, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Midway order of battle

message: Ok I've managed to expand the orbat, especially on the IJN side, but the links needs a lot more help. So if any could dab them I would really appreciate it.--Chinfo 07:12, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It would be very telling if we had even a crude picture of the lines of battle. Even if it just listed the major battle groups. Is this possible? Elementalwarrior (talk) 19:04, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of battle 

message: Article reassessed and graded as dab. --dashiellx (talk) 17:23, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The dagger is present after some names.  I suppose it means that the person died in the battle, but if so, this should be explained.  If, not, its meaning should be given. Kdammers (talk) 19:51, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  †
Talk:Music of My Mind

message: Have removed the following items as they do not concur with the inline citation:
Only two other musicians were used in the recording of this album, as Stevie layered synthesizers, and played all instruments except two solos, a guitar solo by Ben bridges on "Superwoman (Where Were You When I Needed You)", and a trombone solo by Art Baron on "Love Having You Around."
*Art Baron - Trombone ("Love Having You Around")
*Howard "Buzz" Feiten - Guitar solo ("Superwoman")
If anyone can provide suitable references, please re-paste 'em. --Technopat (talk) 13:49, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed possible hoax edits
Talk:Philodemus

message: Wouldn't it be better to move this to Philodemus of Gadara? Does anyone have any objections? --Wetman 08:23, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would be a good idea. Aldux 10:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for fixing my typo. --Wetman 11:46, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are all the links to the "163.1.169.40" website no longer working? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 04:17, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of broken links?
Talk:Partido Komunista ng Pilipinas-1930

message: source of recent added material is http://www.redapollo.org/wiki/index.php/Communist_Party_of_the_Philippines. --Soman 08:24, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading 

message: I think this article should be renamed Communist Party of the Philippines (1930), and Communist Party of the Philippines should renamed Communist Party of the Philippines (1968). I think that would be a more fair and neutral approach to distinguish the two parties which have the same name. Charles Essie (talk) 23:21, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That's really not needed. English is a frequently used language in the Philippines, and Philippine media only uses PKP-1930 for PKP-1930 and CPP for CPP. In this case the "1930" is not a in-wiki invention, it is the way the party calls itself. --Soman (talk) 12:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Yank (disambiguation)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. While some editors noted that the verb "to yank" might be in contention for the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of "Yank", the overall discussion resulted in a consensus that – since the verb does not have its own article – a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT to Yankee is appropriate. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:03, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yank →  – I believe Yank should be a redirect to Yankee as the primary topic, with a hatnote to the dab page. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

text: *A dab page is for navigation. The verb has no article, so your point is moot. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:31, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 30 June 2023
Talk:Martin Haberman

message: I added some media references. It would help to have some in-text citations from Haberman's own work.  J L G 4 1 0 4  18:46, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References added
Talk:Application Services Library

message: This description of the "library" is rather vague and unclear in places.  I write programs for a living, so I think I should have gotten something out of reading it.  Do any real-life organizations actually use this document?  If so, how is it used in practice?  Do people get vocabulary lessons when they are hired?  Is this useful?  Are there more popular competitors?  How is it publicized?  What is the history and (in)significance of this genre? -- Beland 01:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing
Talk:Reggie Bush

message: Bush and Leinart were not the first Heiman winners to team together. September 21, 1946. Army versus Villanova. The 1945 winner, "Doc" Blachard. Was in the Army starting backfield with the 1946 winner (and 1945 runner-up)  Glenn Davis. The pair would make Heisman history later in the season on Novemver 9, 1946 at Yankee Stadium when Army played Notre Dame. Starting for Notre Dame would be 1947 Heisman winner Johnny Lujack and 1949 Heisman Winner Leon Hart. It is the only time four Heisman Trophy winners would take to the field for their teams in a regular season game. Please correct the error. 2A02:810D:BFC0:460:E9CE:B54B:56DE:2CEB (talk) 16:36, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello! Thanks for this information. We can maybe look into adding it. Can you provide us with a source for this?  Red Director (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  False Information, Footnote 26.
Talk:Terry Glenn

message: I'm not too familiar with the '95 Michigan game, but I doubt the importance of Glenn's trash-talking on its outcome.   Given the current small size of the article, I think we should remove the sentences about the game and Charles Woodson.  Unless someone could clarify its improtance, that is. -Meegs 06:59, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trash-talk & Charles Woodson 

message: I'm not sure that he was benched in 2001 - if I remember correctly, he was injured and kinda nagged from the get go of the season, although he may have contributed to the Super Bowl run.
Does anyone know what nationality he is because it is one of the worlds greatest mysteries. i know he was born in America but where does he hale from?
Mexico? Africa? I mean has this not ever occured to anyone? Seriously its impossible to tell.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.108.32.47 (talk) 04:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If he was born in America, then his nationality is American and he hales from America.  Your question is in major need of re-phrasing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.87.207.1 (talk) 16:03, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No. His citizenship would be a United States of America citizen, but not his nationality - which means ethnicity.  The only "Americans" are the native Americans (aka American Indians.) He could be a Hungarian-American, for instance. The U.S. is not a nation-state - it is comprised of many different nationalities.104.169.28.113 (talk) 12:00, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does where his ancestors hailed from enter into it? He was an American. End of story. --Khajidha (talk) 22:13, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benched 2001 

message: Since he did not receive a ring for Super Bowl XXXVI because he didn't play enough games, should that status be voided? TimHowardII (talk) 08:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Bowl Champion status