lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:GCompris

message: Gcompris requires 20$ for registration to unlock most of the program features... It is not correct to classify this software as free or include in free software portal. 88.249.208.188 10:50, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I know, only the Windows version is crippled (which the article notes in the intro). The Linux version is free (as in free beer). Since the source code is available as well, it classifies as "free software". Free software != freeware. utcursch | talk 11:39, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to resurrect an old issue, but the first discusser was actually right. It doesn't matter that the code is available for GNU/Linux, if you cannot get access to it just because you use Windows, the program is not free as in freedom. Freedom 0 is "The freedom to run the program, for any purpose". --–w2bh talk•contribs 14:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You are free to download the source code and compile it yourself for Windows (although you would probably want to remove the code prompting for a key). However, many users will choose not to do so because compiling the software for Windows is likely to be more involved than GNU/Linux. This was discussed briefly on the fsf-community-team mailing list in June 2012 (the archives are private, but you can view them if you sign up for the list). Mikegerwitz (talk) 14:56, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled discussion

message: J'ai compris does not mean 'I understand'.  It is in the past tense and means 'I have understood'. 90.10.145.43 16:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  J'ai Compris 
Talk:Special Minister of State

message: There's now a separate portfolio called Special Minister of State for the Public Service and Integrity.  It's within the PM and Cabinet portfolio.  The familiar Special Minister of State is within the Finance and Deregulation portfolio.
Gary Gray has been given both these portfolios, which will undoubtedly lead to some confusion.  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  09:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Now 2 separate SMOSs

message: "...responsible for defining parliamentary entitlements, which includes responsibilities with..."
I find that confusing - how can "entitlements" include "responsibilities"? (They might be connected, but seem quite different.) Also needs to be more specific.
A quick google search finds a column stating that the SMOS is "a ministry straddling electoral reform, parliamentary perks, taxpayer-funded advertising and a few other recurrent political nightmares"" - However I'm not clear if that includes confusion over the Special Minister of State for the Public Service and Integrity role mentioned by Jack of Oz above. --Chriswaterguy talk 02:51, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need to clarify role 

message: The incumbent listed in the main text and in the upper right is Scott Ryan. The list of Ministers however lists it as Matthias Cormann. Ryan is apparently correct according to:
http://www.aph.gov.au/about_parliament/parliamentary_departments/parliamentary_library/parliamentary_handbook/current_ministry_list  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.47.207 (talk) 11:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ryan/Cormann? 

message: Why is Mick Young not numbered in the list? He held the position longer than anyone in the period from 1972 to 2001?
1.127.107.170 (talk) 07:07, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering?
Talk:Middlewich Branch

message: * Suitably referenced, with inline citations
* Reasonable coverage - no obvious omissions or inaccuracies
* Defined structure, with adequate lead
* Reasonably well written for grammer and flow
* Supporting materials - Infobox, map, image, POI table
* Appropriately understandable
Based on these criteria, I am rating this B. Bob1960evens (talk) 16:43, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:1983... (A Merman I Should Turn to Be)

message: Nowhere has this song been described as one of Hendrix's more blues-based songs. It is referred to as "spacy" by Allmusic and as a "brain-frying psychedelic epic" by NME. This would all point to psychedelic and acid rock.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.147.206 (talk) 15:27, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair point. Good call. Andre666 (talk) 15:31, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of blues rock genre 

message: The song has been referred to as one of Hendrix's more experimental works in various places.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.105.147.206 (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hendrix experimented a lot, as part of an era of music which supported this practice. It should not be classified as experimental rock for that reason though, as it's still follows relatively conventional trends and doesn't feature any strange instruments or anything. Psychedelic rock covers it, and acid rock is an extension. Andre666 (talk) 16:10, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Experimental Rock? 

message: http://finduslaw.com/civil-rights-act-1866-civil-rights-act-1871-cra-42-us-code-21-1981-1981a-1983-1988#3
Read somewhere that it's an allusion to this...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:8B83:4860:58D:190C:D4F2:3950 (talk) 21:26, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: A reliable reference would have been nice. 182.239.146.143 (talk) 09:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible reference to Sec. 1983 of the Civil Rights act of 1871?
Talk:King Street, Perth

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:52, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style 

message: This article requires update - half if not more of the businesses stated in the article have closed/left the street  JarrahTree 12:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Katafygio

message: --GMantz 11:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I had put an image katafygio.jpg and that imaged was deleted. It's a photo taken with my camera and I would like to upload in the article katafygio. Can anybody help me? I need also some instruction regarding coordinates. Thank you in advance.
Has this been translated from Greek by machine? Merenta (talk) 03:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gail Robinson (Neighbours)

message: What do people reckon to changing her name back to Gail Lewis? - JuneGloom07  Talk?  19:53, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I realised she kept the Robinson name a few weeks after I posted that question, lol. I forgot all about it till now, I'll strike it out. - JuneGloom07  Talk?  21:23, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname 

message: - Two little refs about her return.RAIN*the*ONE BAM 23:27, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Racing Homer

message: I have noticed that a page with a similar name to this one (Racing pigeon) redirects to Homing pigeon. My problem with that is that although all Racing Pigeons are of necessity "homing" pigeons. Not all homing pigeons are racing pigeons. So I feel that eventually the two pages will run as two different topics. I'd prefer to change the redirect so people searching for Racing pigeons are directed here. I could have just gone ahead and done the redirect but thought I should post here first for comments?
Also, this page if it is going to be anything like a proper Encyclopedic reference for racing homers needs plenty more work being done to it. Any takers? Sting au 11:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect needed 

message: Why is this article named "Racing Homer"?  In order to conform to Wikpedia article naming convention, should it not be named "Racing homer"? —QuicksilverT @ 23:33, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:48, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article move 

message: I am proposing a merge of this artice with the article named Homing pigeon. Since there are numerous "homing pigeon" type birds, with little or no difference in actual breeding or information. I suggest that all homing and racing pigeon articles are merged, while the main article would state the different names and characteristics of the different 'varieties' of this breed. Show type homers would still be kept separate. If anyone has any opinions, I would love to hear them. Otherwise I will be merging the pages within the week. payxystaxna (talk) 15:55, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge 
Talk:Linda Hill-MacDonald

message: Bot is in error .The entry is just a list of where she coach before pretty basic factual stuff. Smith03 11:52, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hundreds of Cheshire

message: Should articles on hundreds be titled Foo (hundred) or Hundred of Foo? Input and comments please at: 
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_UK_geography#Hundreds. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:42, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Hundreds

message: This article lacks the strength of articles about the hundreds of other English counties. Specifically, the hundreds of Nantwich and Northwich do not rate even a sub-section. The linking words lead to articles about the towns, not the hundreds of the same names.
--Oldontarian (talk) 14:22, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree. As the creator of this article, I was intending to expand it, but family issues and a corresponding long stay in China prevented me from having sufficient access and sources to do so. I see that links have been made which are not ideal, so now I am back in the UK and have access to a good source, I have been planning and working out how to do some expansion.  DDStretch  (talk) 22:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article needs expansion and depth
Talk:Gemunu Watch

message: Listed for Southeast Asian task force. PKKloeppel (talk) 23:52, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Task force
Talk:St. Petersburg Pier

message: Murals inside the pier depict the construction/reconstruction of the facilities over the years. I wonder if pictures of these murals are online. Would be worth adding a URL if they are. Lots42 (talk) 16:42, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  It cites itself 

message: If someone can find a picture for reuse or reuse with modification from an author, I suggest we could put a picture of both piers in the Lens and Pier Park section or at the least the Lens picture since that pier isn't being built and I couldn't find any reuse pictures. If anyone can help that would be great for this Article! Thank you! Adog104 (talk) 20:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Lens/Pier Park photos 

message: Material relating to the park currently being constructed at the former location of the St. Pete Pier should be its own article. It can be made a stub for the time being with expansion as the park is completed. – TheGridExe (talk)  14:47, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Further to add: it looks like there might be enough sources to make it possible. – TheGridExe (talk)  18:06, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

text: ; I would agree. I would like to also keep adding onto this article and any further down the road if that is of appeal. Although I don't know if the information being edited is too specific, or if its just needs reworking. Feedback would be appreciated or any corrections!. Adog104 Talk to me 02:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposed 

message: If anyone has access to articles relating to the pier from the St. Petersburg Times (Tampa Bay Times) or the Evening Independent it would help out massively with the history section instead of using the book sources heavily! Adog104 Talk to me 02:02, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newspapers.com 

message: Who, how much, how long? Wikipietime (talk) 08:36, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm assuming this is in regards to the "St. Pete Pier" moniker, Tampa Bay Business Journal or Tampa Bay Times is the most likely official source for its name. The United States Patent and Trademark Office may tell you either in 2017 or 2019 for commercial use. Either way its the cities branding of the pier, at what cost is unknown besides the cost of signage that was put up around the pier. I think a better question is when was the name "Pier Park" dropped in favor of the "St. Pete Pier". Adog (Talk・Cont) 04:50, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming rights?
Talk:Nordihydroguaiaretic acid

message: The longevity effect on mice is from Aging Cell. 2008 Oct;7(5):641-50. Links
Nordihydroguaiaretic acid and aspirin increase lifespan of genetically heterogeneous male mice.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.237.215.179 (talk) 03:06, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Radio Belarus

message: Hi, this article is clearly written by the Bielorussian governement or one of it's sympathizers. This radio clearly emmits propaganda and is censored by the governement. Please help to make this article POV free. Thanks!
Cheers, BigBrotherIsWatchingYou 12:32, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to fix it a little bit, as well as make the page more English-friendly, if you know what I mean.  Some of the material came directly from the RB website, and so I changed it around a little bit.  Do you think it requires more work?  Any tips?  I hope to improve it to a Class B level, if I ever get the time :).  Any tips?
Thanks!
Mike MAP91 (talk) 02:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Libxml2

message: It should be mentioned that libxml2 provides a DOM interface _and_ a SAX interface. The example on the page is a DOM example.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.198.106.74 (talk) 10:08, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Interfaces

message: What's the meaning with these code samples? Either one ought to fetch the code samples from Wikitutor or something, or from the main site of the lib itself. Here, the code samples are meaningless. It's much more informative if there was:
* in what language is it implemented?
* what language(s) does it API?
* does it use processes, pipes, shmem or is it a simple dynalib?
:Na, but is intended to be thread safe, while in reality it cannot be guaranteed, since the only originally thread-unsafe part, XPath, has been rewritten to be thread safe, but not rigorously tested...
* how full does it cover this or that standard? (i.e. XML)
* does it have known quirks?
Said: Rursus (☻) 11:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the code samples are not useful here (and they're generally discouraged, unless demonstrating a particular algorithm or programming construct). I've removed them for now, and labeled the article as stub. -- intgr [talk] 13:45, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Code samples?

message: I notice that there are several competitors added to the "See also" section, including one just added this week. Should there be sources associated with adding those entries to "See also"? For example, Expat (library) was recently added, but in looking at that Wikipedia article, I don't know enough to know for certain that Expat is a "competitor" to libxml2. I worry that we could wind up with a very long list here of everyone's favorite XML tools. Should there be criteria for adding "competitor" entries to "See also"? - Dyork (talk) 01:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for competitors added to "See also" section?
Talk:Umm ar-Rihan

message: As this topic has just become media popular, thanks to an article posted on social media, its worth touching on the matter of biased articles used as a pretext to insert biased text into this article.
The article in question is found at https://www.ynetnews.com/article/b164zldap . ynetnews is an Israeli media outlet that claims to have no overt political agenda. However Im concerned that the article uses inflammatory rhetoric, and has clear pro-Israel bias that I feel makes it unfit for sourcing a completely new section that attempts to establish a Jewish connection to the place after widespread article proliferation, which could be used in an attempt to establish authenticity of such claims in a feedback loop.
In the new section titled "Pre-British Mandate era", there is novel rhetoric referencing Jewish periods and introducing new information sourced solely from the article in question, where the rest of the article references Roman periods and ruins.
I think that an un-biased corroborating source should be found if this passage is to remain in this article. Vrrtigo (talk) 20:10, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concern for biased articles as a basis for new edits
Talk:Irish Deaf Society

message: Performed a copy edit.  Added an infobox.  Added several references.  However, I had to punt on the History section, because I came to realize that it's a direct cut-and-paste from the European Union of the Deaf member page for the IDS.  I'm not sure that this is a copyright violation, but it could be.  A subject-matter expert should rewrite this section in encyclopedic format.  The references I've added should help flesh out the history and allow someone to rewrite it in proper form. Macwhiz (talk) 17:05, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy edit 

message: Is the bald copy of the group's vision statement really necessary information for an encyclopedia entry?  Certainly, the way it's currently presented, it doesn't represent a neutral point-of-view. Macwhiz (talk) 17:06, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vision statement: appropriate? 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—47.204.165.16 (talk) 22:18, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article, but I've emended them to indicate what I believe to be the correct location. If you still think that there is an error, you'll need to supply a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 01:46, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Shawn Tok

message: Yay! Shawn Rocks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JhJe (talk • contribs) 23:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Royal Academy of Music Museum

message: I would like to find out some information on a Violin my son just reseived from his grandmother. Inside the Violin it is marked with these words and marks... Antonios Stradivaruis Cremonensis, with a circle inside a circle and a cross in the circle with an A & V at the bottom of the cross. Also The words Faciebat Anno, The Number 17 stamped in the wood, with the numbers 4 3 written next to the 17. On the outside of the top neck of the Violin, it has the words COSSER-VATORY VILOIN
Is there anyone that can tell me anything about this Viloin??? My e-mail Address Is DLSNJKS@aol.com
—69.92.191.17 12:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not the place for this comment. If you want your instrument valuated go to a good luthier.--Karljoos (talk) 12:08, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:About KeePass

message: Why was this article moved to About KeePass? Surely the "About" is redundant, or am I missing something? ~Inkington 13:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved back, please someone delete this article. --kAtremer 13:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About KeePass?
Talk:Seth Green (executive)

message: Given that the article was created by User:Sethygreen2000, it rather appears to be either an autobiography or at the least a biography written by somebody with a strong interest in the subject. Please ensure that coverage is neutral. --Moonriddengirl 13:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest

message: Hi - I am the subject of this Wikipedia entry from 2007 and it remains a top google response for me. I was hoping the entry could be updated to include my current (and, if possible, last three) work experiences. I know it is not appropriate for me to edit my biography directly, but I read that I can post a comment like this one and ask if a member of the Wikipedia community might update it. Thanks so much for considering this request! Here's a bit more on me (if this is helpful): https://www.luc.edu/quinlan/faculty/sethgreen.shtml or https://www.linkedin.com/in/sethgreen/ SethJacobGreen (talk) 15:18, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating this profile
Talk:Zimbabwe Mint

message: The Zimbabwean Bond Coins were NOT struck at the Zimbabwean Mint, but at the South African Mint in Pretoria - (203.211.77.227 (talk) 11:12, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zimbabwean Bond Coins. 
Talk:Yume!

message: I just added a tracklisting from record label, needs some attention to make it into a proper album page --7PusaAJ 13:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Copper Dragon Brewery

message: I don't believe this article should be a candidate for speedy deletion as I have yet to finish writing it. I am still in the process of gathering further information to bulk out the article and stop it being a stub.JD554 09:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion

message: The Copper Dragon Brewery is notable with coverage in plenty of reliable sources to meet the WP:GNG. I just need to work them in to the article when I get chance. --JD554 (talk) 10:16, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable brewery 

message: (Copied from the Help Desk) Rojomoke (talk) 14:15, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks for raising this for discussion here on the Talk page. If you want to change the article content, you'll need to provide some kind of publicly viewable reliable source e.g. a local newspaper report etc., to support that change. Also, I believe it's true to say that it once was owned by Greyhawk Brewery? In which case we'd want to keep that bit of history and all the sources that go with it. Regards. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:25, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New details for Copper Dragon Brewery
Talk:VIP Brother season 2

message: This article needs some kind of reliable sources and references before it can be moved to C-Class. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 23:08, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not upgraded to C-Class 
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 29, 2007

message: Present tense in first sentence reads clumsily, IMHO.  I would suggest that "Archaeopteryx is the earliest and most primitive bird known to date" (the adverbial clause, to date qualifying the verb  known) is somewhat preferable, but given that every other statement about the bird is in the past tense, I would suggest that "Archaeopteryx was the earliest and most primitive bird, according to present knowledge" reads better still.  Kevin McE 13:36, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Indonesian National Awakening

message: I took out (ricklefs?') note about a more sophisticated culture... That's one person's opinion.  There's no scholarly way to measure what is more or less sophisticated.  Furthermore, it often implies "better."  One can say that more INdonesians started to emulate ideas they considered "modern," but there's no proof that smoking kreteks, listening to kroncong and the like actually make one truly more sophisticated.  MOre prone to cancer--that would be objective.  Smilo Don (talk) 10:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  removal of "sophisticated" 

message: I suggest we move this article to "Indonesian National Awakening", it seems more logical, and in my experience, the most commonly used term. thoughts? --Merbabu (talk) 12:53, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revival => Awakening... 

message: I’ve moved it, and will check any double redirects, etc, later. Please remind me if I don’t (or do it yourselves! ;-)  ). Cheers --Merbabu (talk) 05:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Done