lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Clifford Williams (actor)

message: Not well-sourced and unclear that he meets WP:BIO. Looked for additional sources but couldn't find any. Tacyarg (talk)
:Try doing a Google Books search. He is obviously notable. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:31, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I did do that and have just done again but can’t see it. I can see you have found info to add though so thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 18:58, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Clinton Jencks

message: This article is clearly unbalanced in favor of labor and those on the so-called "blacklist".  Article needs are write without the leftist agenda.
PainMan (talk) 15:12, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, extreme NPOV issues in this one. Says he suffered prosecution and "persecution." That's a subjective judgment call. It means that he was hounded without cause, which is an opinion, not a fact. It also mentions that the film about him, "Salt of the Earth" was directed by the "blacklisted" director Herbert Biberman. Why not the provable Communist party member Herbert Biberman? Biberman was blacklisted for being a Moscow propagandist. That would be a more accurate depiction of what actually transpired. 178.76.165.48 (talk) 04:54, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pro-labor slant 
Talk:Constance Cummings

message: In 1974, Cummings, who resided in the UK for many decades, was made a Commander of the Order of the British Empire for her contributions to the British entertainment industry. There is no record of her relinquishing her USA citizenship, so the award would have been honorary. However, it was reported in the Sunday Times (December 22, 2003) that in 1975 she was offered a life peerage, but declined it.[citation needed] A peerage would have been possible only if she had acquired British nationality or citizenship.
: This seems to include speculative language, which is OR.  Rather than debating within the article the ifs and buts of her citizenship, what we need is to find the original source for her CBE. If it was honorary, it would have been clearly identified as such. Barring such identification, it can be safely assumed it was a substantive award, and she therefore had acquired UK citizenship beforehand. Whether or not she ever relinquished her US citizenship is an irrelevant issue. All that matters is whether she was a UK citizen or not.  --  JackofOz (talk) 12:17, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hey, I know this is quite belated but I checked the London Gazette supplement (1 January 1974) and Cummings' CBE was not honorary so she must have taken out British citizenship. Whether she ever renounced her U.S. citizenship I have no idea. Quis separabit? 00:08, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks.  Do you have a link for the Gazette entry?  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 22:25, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Honours and citizenship

message: Constance Cummings was also in Haunted Honeymoon with Robert Montgomery. 67.184.246.35 (talk) 00:23, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haunted Honeymoon
Talk:Constance Keene

message: :Thanks.  You're very welcome to edit the article yourself to say pretty much what you said above, and provide suitable citations.  The only thing I'd query is "without peer" - that is a subjective view, and something that not everyone would agree with.  We aim to include material that reflects a Neutral point of view.  And we don't include uncited personal opinions of actual performances, or uncited personal comparisons of one pianist's playing vs. those of other pianists a particular person has happened to hear.  Cheers.  --  JackofOz 09:26, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yes indeed, critical acclaim is a very subjective judgment.  I personally love Constance Keene's work, which is one reason why I created this article.  But I'm sure there are others who have a different view of her.  I encourage you to be be bold and update her article, suitably cited of course.  Happy editing.  --  JackofOz 01:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Constance Moore

message: As is very well-established, if different, equally reliable sources give different birth dates, then it is personal POV to choose one over the other. See, for example Mariah Carey and Lil' Kim. While The Guardian and The Broadway League give birth birth year as 1920, the Associated Press and the Los Angeles Times give 1921. We must include both years. Please note that Wikipedia disallows Find-a-Grave for date information, and allows it only for location of grave, if even that. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthdate
Talk:Consuelo Velázquez

message: Shouldn't the paragraph "The lyrics ... Bocelli" rather be moved to the wikipedia page for Besame mucho rather than being on her page? Isn't it enough to state here that the song would be recorded by dozens of artists? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.253.252.253 (talk) 08:30, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Besame mucho
Talk:Conservation development

message: This article needs sources, and should be fleshed out a little more encyclopedically. But I do think the subject is worthy of its own article. wikipediatrix 01:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs sources 

message: I've been working on cleaning up Conservation community and just discovered this article. I think they should probably be combined, but I'm a new editor and at a loss for what to do here. Can I get some help? Rosenbergwrite (talk) 19:30, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are differences between conservation communities and conservation developments, usually in the amount of conservation and open space required. I would prefer the conservation community title to remain, and developments be seen as a series of variations. I was "livingforestcommunities" and people within my org. started the cc page. I do thank you for the insights and improvements to the page recently. I am teaching a course on cc, and would like to add work on alternate revenue sources; carbon offsets, residential density transfers, and eco-forestry principles. Also, key to cc is the intentionality of the group to conservation. Doug Makaroff and the Trust for Sustainable Forestry 2604:3D08:137D:700:691A:E721:BC61:CA61 (talk) 02:30, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

text: I support the merge into Conservation Development -- doesn't seem to have a ton of distinction as different concepts, Sadads (talk) 20:00, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Support careful merge. The conservation community article appears to hold more references to the actual real estate development background whereas the target article appears to have focused a little more on the bright side aspects without giving away too much about the real estate interests. This has to be made more explicit. -- Kku (talk) 10:18, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 12:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential Duplicate Article: Merger Discussion
Talk:Cordelia Scaife May

message: According to SPLC she was a major contributor to right wing and anti-immigration causes. This should be included. But things like this often start an edit war...  
--Orakologen (talk) 15:18, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racist causes 

message: I am not convinced that the bulk of the causes this person gave to can be accurately defined as “charities,” nor that this person was a lover of humanity, as “philanthropist” suggests. I plan to do a cleanup, so if anyone disagrees please put forth your reasoning. Thank you. (Walker Snarling) (talk) 14:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Charity” and “Philanthropy”
Talk:Fort Gregg-Adams

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:42, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Fort Walker is mentioned after the renaming to Gregg-Adams, without proper citation. https://www.axios.com/2022/05/24/military-army-confederate-names would be a reasonable citation, but is the future Fort Walker properly part of this article at all? Claudia (talk) 12:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Fort Walker is the renamed Fort A.P. Hill, according to The Naming Commission's Report to Congress (via Google Drive), page 36.  It is a part of that fort's page. 108.18.207.147 (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fort Walker?
Talk:Union Base-Ball Grounds

message: The image is lovely but it is a later ballpark on the site, not the subject of the article. And there isn't enough text on 1878-1883 (not to say there should be) to support putting the image where it logically belongs. --P64 02:07, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lake Shore Park 1883 

message: There is a page called Lakefront Park I that (briefly) covers the two Lakefront Parks, even though Lakefront Park redirects here. There should probably be a decision on how to resolve the issue, either by separating the Union Grounds from Lakefront or merging the two. Thoughts? EC2 20:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lakefront Park I vs. Lakefront Park pages
Talk:Śvetāmbara

message: Why are virtually none of these entries conforming to Wikipedia standards?  How hard is it to implement proper dating procedures and box it so it can be used as part of the database?
This article requires a lot of cleanup...  Stevenmitchell 15:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Standards 

message: I have added collapsable sect-subsect tree in Denomination Section, based on reference book which is cited and also looked some books on Google Books to improve it. Please make suggestions and improve it further. --Nizil (talk) 07:11, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: sect subsect tree

message: I propose to merge Śvētāmbara Terapanth into this article, since there is not enough content there. Capankajsmilyo (talk) 10:16, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose on the grounds that a religious sect with a 200 year history is likely to be independently notable. I therefore suggest improving rather than merging. Klbrain (talk) 06:17, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Sthānakavāsī be merged for the reason as stated above. Capankajsmilyo(Talk | Infobox assistance) 15:13, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Further

message: Not sure where the ē came from, which is enshrined in the article title. In Sanskrit it is śvetāmbara not śvētāmbara. There is no letter represented by ē in sanskrit. https://sanskritdictionary.com/scans/?col=1&img=mw1107.jpg
If this were supposed to be Prakrit it would be spelled completely differently as well (no conjoint consonants like 'mb'). Iṣṭa Devatā (talk) 12:12, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , you could also have moved the page yourself or formally requested a move. — kashmīrī TALK 11:50, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be śvetāmbara 

message: The redirect Shewtambar has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  — kashmīrī TALK 13:10, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Shewtambar]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Fort Monmouth

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  --dashiellx (talk) 00:36, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The fort officially closed this week.  Should the whole article now become past tense? --Sam (talk) 03:35, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Tense? 

message: AVRADA (Avionics Research and Development Command/Activity?):  There was a group there that was investigating in Voice Reco and TTS in the Early 1980's  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lhasadad (talk • contribs) 19:07, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other functions housed at Camp Charles Wood
Talk:12 and Holding

message: All media (poster, trailer, website, etc.) associated with this title use the numerical 12, not the word "twelve" (there is no indication that the DVD, scheduled for release within the week, will offer anything different). I am moving this article to 12 and Holding per Wikipedia naming conventions. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 21:39, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bianca_Ryan
says she was in the movie  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.202.255.213 (talk) 06:06, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it seems true. And it is a very minor role. And it is not greatly sourced. But with a good source it might be added as it is her first screen appearance.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 18:33, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Feedback (Marvel Comics)

message: Anyone know when the Feedback (Who Wants to be a Superhero) comic book/movie are slated for release?
Within the first two Wednesdays of October I believe.
:The comic is scheduled for July 2007. Redxiv 05:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Different article. --DocumentN 02:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Charity gambling

message: I removed the prod tag. Charitable gambling is a notable subject, and multiple reliable sources can easily be found and added. And the article could be expanded. Just because someone spammed the article at some point doesn't mean it should be deleted, and "needs improvement" isn't a valid deletion reason either. Rray (talk) 22:23, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Funny I was just reading about Charity gambling today,  I agree this is a notable subject.▪◦▪≡SiREX≡Talk 23:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed prod tag
Talk:The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (2006 film)

message: Estimate of USD $19.95? Can someone please verify this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.44.216.104 (talk) 10:15, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Budget

message: This article is severely underdeveloped and unreferenced. Information on the film's production, release, plot, and reception should be added to the article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 23:48, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article in Dire Need of Expansion
Talk:Fort Ord

message: What is that?  Why is the word tourists in quotes?  Are the people on the bus trip not really tourists?  This makes it sound like some sort of Halloween hayride, but the photo caption suggests it's not.  That part needs rewritten for clarity and by someone that knows how to use quotation marks correctly. 67.169.145.35 (talk) 15:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Secrets of Fort Ord

message: What's with the UC Santa Cruz info in the main page? Vampromero (talk) 03:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: UCSC

message: This article is factually incoherent.  To the point where it is almost uneditable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmhunter (talk • contribs) 16:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Major issue

message: What happen to the community when the base left? How did it affect stores and restaurants that relied on the soldier's income?
How did it effect crime and civility in seaside and surrounding cities?    ```` Twistedpup  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.164.68.172 (talk) 18:41, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: In regards to crime before the base was deactivated, the Monterey Peninsula's rape statistics were twice the national average. Of course, until I find a citation for something over 20 years old, it cannot be posted in the article. Highspeed (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Happen.... 

message: This statement is inaccurate: "The 194th Armored Brigade was activated there under Combat Development Command in 1957, but departed for Fort Knox in 1960." The 194th was activated at Fort Knox, KY, on 21 December 1962. See:
http://www.history.army.mil/html/forcestruc/lineages/branches/div/194arbde.htm
VilePig (talk) 16:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate Narrative: 194th Armd Bde

message: "The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United States and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. Please improve this article and discuss the issue on the talk page. (August 2015)"
Er... it's an article about an old US military base.  Is the article about the old fortress at Eben Emael too Belgium-centric and insufficiently "worldwide?"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.61.153.75 (talk) 07:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "too US-centric?" 
Talk:Shadowboxer

message: What did the critics say, and how did it do ?  -- Beardo (talk) 03:23, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical and commercial
Talk:Rock Island Arsenal

message: Lots of other U.S. Army bases with substantially more information on Wikipedia. I will use those as a guide to help build this Wikipedia out further!Ervin 2007 (talk) 15:44, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommendation 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ervin 2007 (talk) 15:59, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Seminar in Digital and Public History
Talk:Marilyn Hotchkiss' Ballroom Dancing and Charm School

message: The cast order as given does not meet the order of the featured players (given at the beginning of the end credits: Carlyle, Tomei, Steenburgen, Astin...) or the cast list (given later in the end credits: Goodman, Henson, Carlyle, Tomei...).  Not sure which should take precedence. 67.162.236.230 (talk) 16:04, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast order 

message: What is the meaning of this? Well, ther is nothing in the article that isnt a cite from the film itself. As the film is the main source, what extra verification are needed? The article itself isn't that good, no critics or anything else, only cast end plot. Is there really a need for verification more than the film itself? Finally it is the same as to cite from a book. You don't need extra verification for citing from a book. If you want the plot of a book verified, best read the book. If you want the plot of a movie verified, best watch the movie.
As this seems dirctly taken from the film, what qoutes ar needed.
And as there are no interpretations, just pure facts, this is correct. Please explain.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:810D:8800:41A0:709F:7A51:6AC:59FA (talk) 12:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs additional citations for verification.
Talk:Chubb Rock

message: The Background section states:
Cypress Hill released a famous song Insane in The Brain, which was negatively directed towards him on the album Black Sunday.
Where does this come from? The lyrics at http://www.seeklyrics.com/lyrics/Cypress-Hill/Insane-In-The-Brain.html, seem correct to my ears. What does this have to do with Chubb Rock??
--Zahzuhzaz (talk) 08:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious claim re "Insane in the Brain" 

message: Aight, I put that there. It's not my fault because B-Real said it was aimed at him. I'm deleting the Chubb Rock thing once and for all.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.37.115 (talk) 02:09, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Confession

message: Is it really appropriate? It has a quality of a bigfoot sighting shots.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.244.188.107 (talk) 14:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor photo quality
Talk:The Heart of the Game

message: I may not be remembering this correctly, but in the "Making of" section of the DVD, I'm pretty sure Serrill mentions that after the "first year" he thought he was done with the film.  He came in the next year in order to sneak some footage of the next year into the film in order to round it out, when he saw Darnellia, and knew he had to keep going. In the article, it says that Darnellia came in two years after. I'd edit it, but I could be wrong, so could someone verify this for me? Crystal Myr (talk) 05:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Two years after first season?

message: Someone care to explain how a plot synopsis can "contain original research or unverified claims"?  Or, given that the tag refers to the Talk Page, why such a tag was added without notification here? Hal (talk) 01:33, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "(O)riginal research or unverified claims."

message: Saw this content in the article:
"Darnellia graduates from high school with honors and is named the Northwest Player of the Year.
Although Darnellia didn't receive any college scholarships, she attended North Seattle Community College."
I thought the film said she played for NSCC, then was named Northwest Player of the Year. Rjhenn (talk) 06:47, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline issue
Talk:Fateless (film)

message: There is no discussion as to why an editor thinks a contributor is too involved with the film/article. It is poorly sourced, but there does not appear to be any OR here - little content at all. Objections need to be explained if issues are to be corrected.Parkwells (talk) 00:58, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: No discussion of editors' problems with article
Talk:Tubal Uriah Butler

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 06:52, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Due to continuous vandalism, dated back until 2008 -- Valerius Myotis (talk) 05:37, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup/rewrite needed 
Talk:The Message in the Bottle

message: Dear user:Michail,
Awesome job so far. I like what you're doing here, and appreciate your work and attention to this neglected work by Walker Percy. I had only read Lost in the Cosmos and knew about Percy's interest in semiotics and Charles Pierce: but had not been aware of the scope and largesse [Middle English largesse, from Old French, from large, generous, from Latin largus] of Percy's investment in this topic. This is an important contribution to the Wikipedia community. Thanks again for the hard work. Likewise your largesse ( Generosity of spirit or attitude) is in evidence here. I'll keep checking back for more updates. 
Meanwhile, let me see if I can find the first edition book cover and add an info boxChristian Roess 02:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

message: This is very interesting, but it coould use some more criticism and references to what effect it's had (I for one have never heard of it), or it might as well get an importance?! box above it. grendelsmother 21:32, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmm 

message: :Image:WalkerPMessageBottle.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
i agree  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.162.160.246 (talk) 23:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:WalkerPMessageBottle.jpg
Talk:Crossover (2006 film)

message: I changed those four words above to "Play By Your Own Rules".  The poster shows every letter as uppercase.  This is a more reasonable compromise, instead of the, IMO, worse looking Play by your own rules.  If you don't capitalize all, don't capitalize just one!71.135.75.84 03:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Play by your own rules