Talk:Button Gwinnett

message: Just wondering why the fact that he died as a result of a wound he received from a duel is not mentioned?
Button Gwinnett was NOT the first signer of the DOI to die.  john Morton had died a few months before.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.233.163.194 (talk) 00:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duel 

message: I have seen sections on other biographical pages with this heading (see for example Nikola Tesla) or pages by themselves with this title (eg Hitler in popular culture).  Would it be appropriate to create a section here, if I have only one instance to contribute at this time?  Terrek 01:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Button Gwinnett in Popular Culture 

message: At the beginning of the article, and in the info box on the right, Gwinnett's date of death is listed as May 19th, but in the article body, it's given as May 27th, with a source (which I have not checked). If the source is right, shouldn't the other dates be changed, too? iPhil (talk) 15:47, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The source I posted listed May 27th as the death date, although other sources such as this one: Signers: the 56 Stories behind the Declaration of Independence gives the May 19th date. Most sources agree on the date of the duel (May 16th) but there does not seem to be agreement on the death date. Of interest is a letter titled Historical Duel. A Letter Written by Brigadier General L. McIntosh to Colonel John Laurence, Military Secretary to General Washington, Three Days After the Death of Button Gwinnett, Being a True Relation of the Duel, of the Events that Caused it and of Its Consequences, Etc. (Dated 30 May 1777.) which might give more credence to the May 27th date.Wkharrisjr (talk) 17:26, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death date 

message: I removed the reference in the first paragraph of the article to his being the second signer.  This is because it has been long established that Josiah Bartlett of New Hampshire was the second signer.  Bartlett's signature appears in the upper right column at the top.  Despite John Hancock signing directly under and in the center of the blank space under the declaration, legal documents were always signed on the far right.  Additional signatures were added under that first signature and continued until the bottom.  For a document with many signatures a second column would be started immediately to the left of the first column if there was no more space under that first column.  After that signatures would continue column by column from right to left.  If you look at the facsimile copy or, as I have, examined the original at the archives, you will note that there were only three signatures in the far left column and those signatures were not aligned with the left side of the document itself.  There were only three signatures because those were the last three remaining.  Not only was this gentleman NOT the second signer, he was third from last.  Note that the signatures were tighter to the right of the page to make room for the other signers but as they continued signing the spacing is looser due to the fact that the early signers were more conservative of space.  While some have said the story is apocryphal, there really was a complaint that John Hancock's signature was too big and the other signers were requested to make their signatures smaller to make room for everyone.  But as the signing progressed they had conserved so much space that by the time the last few signers got their turn there was plenty of space left so larger and more flamboyant signatures occurred and there was more space between them.  Some spaces were reserved for those not present at the time most signing occurred (August 2 1776) but those were never used as signers just added under the previous signer for the most part.  None of what I just wrote is original but honestly I forgot which book I read all this out of decades ago or I would change the article and add the citation quoting from that book.  I have added this explanation so people would understand why I deleted the reference.  Also I want articles about the Declaration of Independence to be as accurate as possible as I am descended from two of the signers and distantly related to 17 others.  If I can figure out which book discussed this I will update accordingly.  I would of course welcome and invite a discussion on this topic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.144.213.97 (talk) 20:21, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of Signing 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Button Gwinnett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060404102627/http://www.cviog.uga.edu/Projects/gainfo/gasigner.htm to http://www.cviog.uga.edu/Projects/gainfo/gasigner.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: What's the story behind this strange (unique?) first name? Equinox ◑ 20:05, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name "Button" 

message: In this article it says "McIntosh, although wounded, quickly recovered and went on to live until 1806. He was never charged in connection with Gwinnett's death."
However, the article on Lachlan McIntosh says "Gwinnett's allies had McIntosh charged with murder, but he was acquitted in the ensuing trial."
Would anyone with more historical expertise than I care to resolve this discrepancy?
*Septegram*Talk*Contributions* 14:33, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duel Aftermath 

message: No mention of slave-owning. I feel that this category should be restricted to people whose slave-owning history was notable in itself. Valetude (talk) 09:06, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:American slave owners