Talk:Latin liturgical rites

message: As far as I know, the Dominican Rite is alive an well -- why is it listed as "defunct"?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.143.230.126 (talk • contribs) 
:I suppose the reason is that the Dominican Order has abandoned it.  Individual priests sometimes celebrate Mass in that form, with or without proper authorization; but it is no longer the Dominican Order's rite.  There have also in modern times been celebrations according to the Sarum Rite or Use; but that does not mean that the Sarum Rite is alive and well.  Lima 05:46, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: I appeal to the persistent anonymous editor to justify his belief in the existence of a distinct Franciscan Rite by more than referring to the Catholic Encyclopedia, which instead states explicitly that the Franciscans "have always followed the Roman Rite for the celebration of Mass."  And I appeal to the same editor, if he fails to justify this belief, to stop reinserting here a mention of that alleged distinct rite.
Does any reliable source say that the Franciscans ever adopted a liturgical rite other than the Roman Rite?
Franciscans wore sandals at Mass, but they celebrated the Roman Rite, not some alleged distinct Franciscan Rite.  St Ignatius of Loyola originally wanted the Order he founded to have no singing at Mass, but the Rite used by the Jesuits was the Roman Rite, not some alleged distinct Jesuit Rite.
This site] shows how the texts of the rites of Lyon, Braga, the Dominicans, the Carthusians, the Carmelites, Milan (Ambrosian Rite) and the Mozarabic Rite differed from that of the Roman Rite.  What difference was there between the text of the Roman Rite and that of the alleged Franciscan Rite?  Lima 08:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am indeed grateful to Anonymous 69 for his response to my appeal and for pointing out the error concerning the Servite Order.  Lima 19:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged Franciscan Rite 

message: Glagolitic liturgy is based on Roman rite, but I guess there are some other specific (Eastern?) features besides language. Some from Byzantine, some frome Aquileian or Gallican rites. So, can we talk about Glagolitic Use of Roman rite? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.86.230.114 (talk • contribs) 
:As long as it is only a matter of "guessing", we cannot.  Any sourced evidence?  Lima (talk) 14:02, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glagolitic Use 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Latin liturgical rites. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20060916182317/http://apostolicos.en.telepolis.com:80/9-BRAGA_%28Portugal%29.html to http://apostolicos.en.telepolis.com/9-BRAGA_(Portugal).html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:20, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Latin liturgical rites. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://apostolicos.en.telepolis.com/9-BRAGA_%28Portugal%29.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061205024644/http://www.chartreux.org/en/frame.html to http://www.chartreux.org/en/frame.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927163447/http://www.ewtn.org/vexperts/showmessage.asp?number=408189&Pg=&Pgnu=&recnu= to http://www.ewtn.org/vexperts/showmessage.asp?number=408189&Pg=&Pgnu=&recnu=
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150521124654/http://www.liturgica.com/html/litWLEarly.jsp?hostname=null to http://www.liturgica.com/html/litWLEarly.jsp?hostname=null
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110927163447/http://www.ewtn.org/vexperts/showmessage.asp?number=408189&Pg=&Pgnu=&recnu= to http://www.ewtn.org/vexperts/showmessage.asp?number=408189&Pg=&Pgnu=&recnu=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:52, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Latin liturgical rites. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120185437/http://www.maternalheart.org/cabrol/cabrol_preface.htm to http://maternalheart.org/cabrol/cabrol_preface.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080226231610/http://www2.bc.edu/~morrilb/Egbulem.pdf to http://www2.bc.edu/~morrilb/Egbulem.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This section says "they are rarely used".  Are they used at all?  The link does not work. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 12:52, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Algonquian and Iroquoian uses