Talk:Hepialidae

message: The article is generally good and well written, however, I'd like to see the following issues addressed prior to passing:
*Possibly insufficient references for a family article (only 9 references?), some material remains unreferenced. Perhaps use intext citations? This makes the article easier to read & verify in my opinion. See WP:CITE. I recommend using footnotes eg: Brown J (1900) Example study on something Journal of Examples 18:5678-9876. See: Wikipedia:Footnotes for more information. 
*Taxobox - the taxobox creates much white space, I recommend moving the list of genera into the text.
*Breadth - I wonder given the limited number of references used whether the article does cover the breadth of the topic. As I'm not an insect biologist I'll leave this for others to determine.
===Minor recommendations===
*Some further images (larvae, pupa) may be of benefit
*Notable species? Why are the European fauna dealt with separately/alone?
 
Cheers, David. MidgleyDJ 21:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the status here? The on hold period expires today. IvoShandor 07:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not completely addressed...sigh... fail for now. MidgleyDJ 08:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Roger that. You'll get there, don't worry. : ) IvoShandor 08:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I proposed but I have not had chance to research any new refs - will be reproposed soon I hopeRichard Barlow 16:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Points that need addressing prior to passing

message: *Some further images (larvae, pupa) may be of benefit
*Notable species? Why are the European fauna dealt with separately/alone?
 
Cheers, David. MidgleyDJ 21:41, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the status here? The on hold period expires today. IvoShandor 07:42, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not completely addressed...sigh... fail for now. MidgleyDJ 08:50, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Roger that. You'll get there, don't worry. : ) IvoShandor 08:54, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I proposed but I have not had chance to research any new refs - will be reproposed soon I hopeRichard Barlow 16:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor recommendations

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hepialidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ethnopharmacology.org/newsLetter/nl_2004/ISEnl4EE.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070808180717/http://www.ethnopharmacology.org/newsLetter/nl_2004/ISEnl4EE.pdf to http://www.ethnopharmacology.org/newsLetter/nl_2004/ISEnl4EE.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:27, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hepialidae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070317021415/http://www.ento.csiro.au/gallery/moths/Hepialidae to http://www.ento.csiro.au/gallery/moths/Hepialidae
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:01, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified