Talk:Natacha Rambova

message: I added the material about Rambova's possible affair with Nazimova under the IP 64.228.99.78 (I had thought I was signed in to Wikipedia, but wasn't).  Anyway, my source is Emily Leider's biography of Rudolph Valentino that also includes a lot of material about Rambova.  Leider--who is undecided herself about whether or not Rambova had an affair with Nazimova--draws on both Gavin Lambert's biography of Alla Nazimova, Nazimova (1997) which argues Rambova was in fact bisexual, and Michael Morris's Madame Valentino (1992) which argues just as firmly that she was not.  
I myself am very tired of all these dubious rumours about actresses and writers that have added to Wikipedia in recent months, but here there does seem to be some justification in at least mentioning that Rambova may have been involved with Nazimova.  Leider's biography is generally well respected (going by the reviews I read anyway), and she does make an effort to treat questions about Rambova's sexuality in a balanced manner.
There are no doubt many Wikipedians whose knowledge of Nazimova and Rambova is far greater than mine, and if they chose to take issue with my source, that's fine.
Miss Tabitha 02:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rambova's Sexuality

message: Rambova is listed in several categories stating she was Mormon. Though she was a descendent of a prominent Mormon leader, there is no evidence (that I have found, anyway) that Rambova identified as Mormon. Until someone can provide citation, I'm removing her from these categories. -Porlob 17:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To answer both she wasnt gay; and she wasn't Mormon.  She may have had somne bisexual flings but she primarily considered herself straight.  As for Mormon she was a descendant but she was actually a Spiritualist and she really enjoyed Egyptian religion themes.--Maggiedane (talk) 06:23, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mormon?

message: "...she witnessed a pro Franco bishop who wouldn’t provide sanctuary to a woman when leftists were rounding up people and shooting."
I don't understand why the pro-Franco bishop, who was right-wing, refused to protect a woman persecuted by the left-wing people? If the bishop (right-wing) refused to protect a woman, who was leftist and persecuted by Franco supporters, I would "understand" why he did that: because he didn't like the left-wing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.196.207.173 (talk) 02:10, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think the Spanish Civil war was as simple as "left" vs "right" you really need to read up on it a bit more! A fascist bishop denying sanctuary to a liberal/monarchist/conservative--republican catholic woman pursued by communists, trotskyists, anarchists, or "uncontrolables" sounds plausible to me. Maybe the bishop was a coward as well as a francoist and only wanted to save his own skin? Maybe the woman had skipped communion that week? Plausible, but I am just speculating. Benvenuto (talk) 07:28, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish Civil War

message: Leider's book is fab, but Madame Valentino would be much more relevant.  However it is an extremely large book, and I do not have time to go add sources.  I would recommend someone who does have time might.  Thanks. --Maggiedane (talk) 07:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That was the intent. Other sources need to be added, it didn't mean you had to do it. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: One Source tag

message: I’m hoping I’ve resolved these issues with my full re-draft of today 26/5/14.
It may seem a drastic cut in length, but much of the article seemed to be taken up with long-running feuds between people who are forgotten today  -  as is Rambova herself (arguably), except among arcane scholars, one of whom presumably wrote the previous version. This means that many of the citations have also been culled, but as nearly all of these have come from one source, I don’t think much has been lost.
Anyway, I’ve taken the liberty of removing the tags, and I trust this is OK. Valetude (talk) 11:43, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple issues 

message: Substituted at 00:52, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Is there some good reason for forcing a fixed image size in pixels? If not, WP:IMGSIZE says to use a scaling factor instead. Kendall-K1 (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: are you referring to the upright function? I had sized them just so they didn't jut out too much/so they aren't too obtrusive on the text, but I realize this will present differently from computer monitor to computer monitor (or tablet monitor to tablet monitor). I can add the upright function to the thumbnails. --Drown Soda (talk) 23:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image sizes 

message: I have to get the book written by Michael Morris. If he would of done actual research into Winifred's (Natacha) early life, he would of realized he even got the basics wrong. I guess gossip and hearsay was easier to publish. 
 
Winifred filed for divorce in December 1906 (i believe that was the correct month, i dont have the file in front of me) and the divorce was granted and finalized on January 7, 1907. 10 days later, she married her 3rd husband, who was a friend to the Shaughnessy’s (according to sworn statements by both Mr and Mrs Dewolfe taken from the civil war pension file of Michael Shaughnessy, where Winifred filed a petition for support of her and Michael's minor child. I guess it was easiest for Winifred to marry a friend of her husband/ex husband, as it didnt require her to go out and meet someone new).
Morris says in his book that Michael would steal Winifred's belongings and gamble them away. Michael was a well known millionaire. After the death of his first wife who was his business partner in mining, someone who he considered his equal, and his rock, his life definitely took a down hill turn, and he lost a majority of his wealth due to bad investments. Towards the end of his life, while he was no longer a millionaire, he also was not desitute, and in Winifred's petition for divorce she states that he was more then capable of financially supporting her and their daughter. Claiming he stole her possessions is absurd and the author is trying to paint Michael as the Villan of the first part of Natacha's story.
The author also forgets to mention how Michael got to Utah in the first place and says nothing about his life before Utah. 
After fighting in the civil war, he was first appointed by president Johnson to the IRS in Carrollton Alabama. He was then appointed by President Grant in 1870 to United States marshal of the southern division of Mississippi. During his time as marshal, he oversaw the Kkk trials and was involved with bringing members of that organization to justice. He was heavily involved in politics after the civil war, and was a life long member of the republican party. He was a fierce supporter of equal rights. After his term as marshal ended, President Grant appointed him next to the IRS. 
In 1878, he was forced to leave Mississippi for the safety of his family and his own safety. He wasnt liked in reconstruction era Mississippi bc he was a radical republican, advocated for the rights of black people, and investigated and arrested members of the KKK, some of which the Vicksburg Herald called, good and honest men. 
It was his involvement in the Chisolm massacre and the fact he brought national attention to Mississippi by writing the new york Herald about the situation in Kemper County (chisolm massacre) that apparently crossed the line. A newspaper article said he recieved constant threats against his life while living in Mississippi, but after the Chisolm massacre, Michael new him and his family absolutely could not stay. 
That is when he was appointed U.S. marshal of Utah by President Rutherford B. Hayes. He served one term, and ended up staying in Utah the rest of his life. He was well known in Salt Lake City, and was liked and respected while marshal of the state (terrority at the time) and also as a businessman. He remained a prominent figure in business and state politics (he was also well known in political and business circles in NY and DC) until he died in 1910. He led an extremely extraordinary life in a very difficult time in American history, and I'm proud of the contributions he made to make the United States a better place for all. 
To sum it up, Michael Morris makes my relative look like some bum, that both Winifred's had to escape. While I will admit, the man was human and had his faults, Winifred Kimball was no victim. Michael's wealth wasn't what it was when she first married him, so she had to move on to the next. The third one wasn't providing her with the wealth and social status she desired, so she had to divorce that husband too. Luckily the fourth husband was rich enough, so she could stay married to that one. I think Winifred was an opportunist, whose priorities were wealth and status. 
And that is the truth about Col.Michael Shaughnessy, father to Natacha Rambova. Not the version Morris made up. Trishaj12 (talk) 23:58, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colonel Michael Shaughnessy