lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Harsimus Cove station

message: Is it "Harismus" or "Harsimus" ? Frank Lynch (talk) 03:00, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It is "Harsimus" as shown on the station stop sign :File:Harismus Cove HBLR platform jeh.JPG included in the article and on the system maps. 67.86.74.107 (talk) 23:06, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Newport station (Hudson–Bergen Light Rail)

message: Current NJT materials refer to this station as "Newport," dropping the reference to Pavonia.  (See references sited on the main page.)  Should the title of the article be changed to "Newport (HBLR station)"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.247.22.113 (talk) 22:21, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you or anyone else have an exact date for the name change? Because I had to bring back the old commons tag, and I have a feeling that has to be renamed accordingly. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  02:59, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change to Newport
Talk:Josh Burkman

message: I began working on improving Burkman's wikipedia page but I have run out of time.  Over the next couple of days I will be added sources/references and more information.  Please be patient with my schedule.  If anyone feels anything else needs to be cited feel free to tag it and I will have it taken care of in the next few days.  Thesaddestday 09:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Rif Dimashq Governorate

message: The infobox here currently lists Douma as the capital. Wikidata lists the capital as Damascus, which is in its own separate governorate; though, Wikidata's reference for that information is just Russian Wikipedia, so not too helpful. If Douma truly is the capital, can someone find a reputable source for that? If Douma is not the capital, what is? Is there any official administrative center at all? If there isn't one we should remove the capital from the infobox. No Lives Left ⸞NᴇᴡTᴀʟᴋ⸟ 05:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: ...so it wasn't true at the time someone put it in the infobox, but it's true as of today? No Lives Left ⸞NᴇᴡTᴀʟᴋ⸟ 01:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital?
Talk:Academy Bus Lines

message: How does the NJT 139 bus work? The schedule says both NJT and Academy; are some trips operated by each one? Academy's site doesn't list it' only Route 9 to Wall Street. --NE2 15:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Some extraneous information or otherwise irrelevant information in the article has been removed. Unless an explanation as to why it is relevant is provided, please do not un-comment. --AEMoreira042281 (talk) 19:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Extraneous information
Talk:Lakeland Bus Lines

message: Shouldn't this article be updated? Does Wikipedia have a New Jersey team? Didn't the Lakeland Buses running from NJ cities discontinue all of their commuter routes from New Jersey's suburban and urban towns.in March, and are now only running chartered trips. NJ no longer has private carrier service to NYC, because of reduced ridership from the Covid-19 Pandemic. Stevenmitchell (talk) 08:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shouldn't This Article Be Updated?
Talk:Main Line (NJ Transit)

message: I think the lead section of this article should be re-written, specifically, it should state that the Main Line is a railway, before saying anything else. Although it is clear by reading the entire lead that it's a railway, this does not make for easy reading/understanding and is not standard for lead sections. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 11:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead section

message: Hi, I made a line description template here Template:NJTransit-Main (displayed at right).  Please comment and correct as needed before adding to the article.  See also Template:NJTransit-Main-Bergen.  Thanks. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 13:04, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added to article. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 18:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This will be incorporated into the Temmplate:Infobox rail line I will be inserting into this article. --AEMoreira042281 16:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Line description template 

message: Reading the Port Jervis Line article, and keeping in mind the above template made, I am proposing a merger between that article into tjis article. --AEMoreira042281 16:21, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: I need a full explanation why the images in the article keeps being removed. NHRHS2010 |  Talk to me   23:14, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation, please? 

message: Is there any reason the line plan on the main page does not work? It shows coding but doesnt make sense. the map on this page seems fine.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.10.238 (talk • contribs) 
:It looks fine to me (using Firefox 2).  What browser are you using? --ChrisRuvolo (t) 19:43, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Line plan

message: I am having trouble following some of the history. I don't know if is because I am not from the area or what, but is anyone else going through this. There is a sentence that mentions two different things being abandoned that runs on for a while. Leefkrust22 (talk) 02:11, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording 
Talk:Rockland Coaches

message: Never thought I'd have to come here over something so trivial but here I am, I've removed the days on the route info as we don't ever have these on route tables (unless the company is notable for running bus service 29 on a Tuesday then these aren't needed),
As the route table's sourced it's fine however the days aren't and it borders on WP:NOTTRAVEL,
You have to remember this is an encyclopedia not a travel guide,
Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:03, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route list
Talk:West Trenton Line (NJ Transit)

message: Prior to the 1960s this line saw heavy daily passenger service in both directions, by the Central Railroad of New Jersey, Reading and Baltimore and Ohio. There would have been two tracks during this time. As noted in the text, after 1958, the B&O service was eliminated from the line.Dogru144 (talk) 23:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Two tracking
Talk:Progressive utilization theory

message: Please be specific.  Here's mine:
1)  There were a couple of independent, reliable sources unearthed after the current text was proposed.  There are two in particular I can get out of UC Berkeley later this week.
2)  Prout logo and photo of Sarkar would help the layout a lot.
3)  More reliable sources.  Not sure how realistic this is, but the ceiling on the quality of this article is going to be determined by WP:RS more than anything else.
Others?  Garamond Lethetc 05:49, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a SAGE account? There's one article I saw in a SAGE journal that looks promising. Mangoe (talk) 21:29, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  Go ahead and post the cite.  Garamond Lethetc 21:38, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

text: Instructor of economics. Location (talk) 05:00, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Will do.  Garamond Lethetc 05:18, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

text: I'm at UCDavis this weekend and they have [Prout Manifesto].  Only two copies of this book known to worldcat.  It's in their Special Collection which doesn't open until 10a Monday, so I'll try to extend my trip until then.  If anyone else here is in the NorCal area and can get access to this, let me know.  Garamond Lethetc 20:49, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what needs to be improved first? 

message: I'm thinking of splitting the description into "PROUT as social order" and "PROUT as economic theory" with Crovetto's work in the former and Friedman in the latter.  Ravi Batra may be able to make an appearance in both; I won't be able to tell until I get back to the library.
Thoughts?  I'm a little be leery of giving so much weight to Friedman—the paper has only been cited once—but there's so little independent work in this area that I hate to discard anything that has been peer reviewed.
Garamond Lethetc 17:43, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be useful to separate the social and economic, on the other hand they may be too entwined. The article could certainly do with editing for clarity. Jonpatterns (talk) 10:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Structure 

message: User  appears to have ties to this article's subject as it is the only article they have edited. Jonpatterns (talk) 10:46, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 

message: The quote was rendered correctly, but in context, Erdman's verdict seems to be on the book as a whole; it's not clear that Proutism itself involves any "voodoo historical theories." Copying here for the sake of WP:PRESERVE; maybe something can be salvaged from this source.
Part removed:
* Economist Paul Erdman, in the Los Angeles Times , described Prout as: "a strange mixture of voodoo historical theories and sound economic analysis"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.114.154.235 (talk) 00:25, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Not in source cited" problem
Talk:Triple modular redundancy

message: I miss-spelt triple (Tripple). Ooops. Can some one fix this & links? (I dont know how). Also, article really needs a diagram. --- Aboeing
"What I tell you three times is true." -- Lewis Carroll
this quote doesn't seem to fit right...
the rest of the page quotes examples where two ouf of three is right...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.183.180.34 (talk) 17:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A recent edit changed
"... faster than Hamming error correction hardware" to "... faster than Hamming error correction software"
with the comment "Hamming code is software not hardware".
The ECC memory article seems to imply (with its discussion of "ECC circuits") that Hsiao and Hamming error correction actually is in hardware, not software, but doesn't really comment on their speed compared to TMR.
Alas, the citation used to support the original sentence is apparently now offline.
Can we get some other reliable source to explicitly support that sentence?
--DavidCary (talk) 08:17, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: 2014 isn't exactly recent!! I think it is self-evident that software implemented Hamming is going to be slower than hardware TME.  It will be slower even than hardware Hamming.  Hamming is a relatively simple system and it is unlikely that a software solution would be chosen over hardware. Ref 5 says that the much more sophisticated Reed-Solomon system is done in a NASA VLSI chip, although it can also be done in software.  I'm inclined to change it back and assume that is what the source says.  The editor who changed it simply asserted the fact without providing a new source.  The edit summary asserts that Hamming code is software.  This is misguided, Hamming code is neither hardware not software, it is a code. SpinningSpark 21:52, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  hardware vs software
Talk:Off! (brand)

message: The Australian OFF! commercial seems to be a dub of an American version. For one thing, the clothing and hairstyles are not of current Australian trends. Also, you are unlikely to find such a house and background anywhere within Australia. ThirdEchelon 10:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: OFF. Off. 2607:FB91:161B:D3F:3246:4821:A570:CACB (talk) 02:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep Upstairs Taken Down Everywhere, In The World, Keep Everyone Under Control
Talk:Central Authentication Service

message: This page needs to disambiguate itself from Globus CAS or Community Authorization Service, which is a similar system 129.215.62.144 10:34, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 05:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

text: According to http://www.jasig.org/cas, CAS is at least in part a protocol. --AlainR345Techno-Wiki-Geek 05:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

text: I think that's due to the stub quality, it touches several subjects but doesn't expound. There is the concept of a Central Authentication Service which has been around from the 1950s and the earliest network authentication needs. There are implementations of the Central Authentication Service concept that include Kerberos dating back to 1985 and DAP (with successors LDAP and Active Directory) dating back to 1988. There is Apereo's 2005 CAS Protocol implementation of the concept. And there is Apereo's software product called CAS that uses the protocol. The stub-quality article mentions all of these without differentiating them.  As the article is written now someone could confusingly believe CAS is a web service and also a protocol created in 2005, implemented in the 1980s, and first used in the 1950s. If the articles were fully developed I can imagine at least these four full topics. Bwagstaff (talk) 18:20, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:SS Baychimo

message: Is it in any way possible this is the mysterious ghost ship alluded to in the beginning of 30 Days of Night? 174.91.217.122 (talk) 02:38, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

message: I'd like a map of the sightings with indication of the usual extent of the banquise in the area.
>March of 1962, she was seen sailing along (added  20:53, 24 November 2007? 206.174.1.236 )  "Sailing" seems too active a verb here.  Any comment from the person who added it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polebridge (talk • contribs)  
I bet they were not Inuit, but were Yupik, not Inuit.  Inuit is not a politically correct synonym for Eskimo.  It is a distinct language group, and the terms is usually used to refer to Canadian Eskimos.  Canadians turned "Eskimo" into a pejorative, but it really has not become so in Alaska.  Yupik, Inupiat are the common ways I have usually heard Alaskans refer to the various language groups.  In fifty years in Alaska, I don't think I have ever heard an Alaskan Eskimo refer to himself as an Inuit, though I suppose you might dig up somebody who had been indoctrinated by foreign college professors or something.Hypercallipygian (talk) 18:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Differential association

message: As a Lecturer at a UK university, I disagree with pretty much all of <Revision as of 21:58, 1 November 2006 (edit) (undo) 66.255.187.246
Although it this person is clearly trying to make the material easier to understand, they aren't familiar with Sutherland's work, hence actually making it more confused and more inaccurate. I can't figure out how to revert these edits though. I hope someone can help. 86.53.49.230 10:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sutherland's work

message: The following statement: 'This theory focuses on how individuals learn how to become criminals, but does not concern itself with why they become criminals' needs further clarification/explaining.
Why and how questions are closely related. For example, if a 'criminal' learns his/her behaviour by way of social interaction i.e. a theory explaining how the 'criminal' learned his/her behaviour, outlook, and position in life -- doesn't this also explain why the 'criminal' became one in the first place i.e. by way of social social interaction?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.84.68.252 (talk) 03:22, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: clarification

message: This is a terrible article, one of the worst I've ever seen on WP. It's poorly written and contains a number of dubious assertions. I would caution students not to use it as a source--you may well fail.Pokey5945 (talk) 23:19, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Terrible Article

message: Explanation begins with a non-sequitur that reads like a research note or article intro (...are proposed and empirically tested), but never explains these tests, methods, rationale, or anything at all other than asserting a random string of statements that bear no clear relation to anything else in the article (...well corroborated by data...) what data?  (theory explains 51% of variance) with what diagnostic?  Is this an R-squared?  I attempted to revise the paragraph, keeping basic information and removing the uncited and unexplained research results, but it was hopeless.  It's terrible, confusing, and now deleted. please rewrite if this concerns you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:37E0:5FF0:7CE6:81FD:7175:7E22 (talk) 11:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation first paragraph
Talk:V. O. Chidambaram Pillai

message: Some rewriting to improve the clarity -- consistency, grammar, style.  The original content should be left undisturbed.Fconaway 10:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A couple of weeks ago, I went over this article with a major copyedit, purging duplicated material, irrelevent trivia, peacock terms and poor grammar; tidying it up to Wikipedia formatting standards and rearranging the flow of paragraphs to make it more readable. User:Marmiraja appears to wish to revert to an earlier - and in my opinion, substandard - version of the article; I am opening this discussion here to allow him/her to justify this decision. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:10, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits by [[User:Marmiraja]]

message: my  paternal grandfather parakkal vishwanatha menon(1880-1942) a political worker who also contributed to the freedom struggle can be proud of this man my paternal grandfather  wrote Bharat bandhu a play in 1907,was also a playwright he also  did other things for the less privileged ect- my late grandfather from Vadavannur(palakkad)(kerala). Windsurfmango16 (talk) 02:17, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  hello-contributed to the freedom struggle
Talk:Toni Arthur

message: Why is this listed for deletion under "non notable person"? The link on IMDB alone would suggest there is sufficient public activity to warrant inclusion. If this article is deleted then I would suggest a huge number of others need to be as well.--Stevouk 10:55, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a huge number of other articles that need to  be deleted but you're right, this person seems notable enough. P4k 11:00, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: We currently have her meeting Dave Arthur in 1964 and marrying him in 1963. Seems a bit backwards, but without references I'm not sure how to fix, other than changing both to "the early 1960s" or some such. --rbrwr± 20:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronology error 
Talk:Thomas Pennant

message: Article reads much like what it is, a bit of 1911 text. It needs
1) a better lead
2) yeah, better text, but at least some copy-editing
3) links (text, quotes, refs) to other people who corresponded (we already have Gilbert White, there were certainly others). Thomas Bewick cites Pennant as an authority for species descriptions in his A History of British Birds.
4) citations.   Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:46, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: To do
Talk:History of the battery

message: Daniell: "In 1836, he invented the Daniell cell, which consists of a copper pot filled with a copper sulfate solution, in which is immersed an unglazed earthenware container filled with sulfuric acid and a zinc electrode. The earthenware barrier is porous, which allows ions to pass through but keeps the solutions from mixing."
Dancer, later: "The porous pot version of the Daniell cell was invented by John Dancer, a Liverpool instrument maker, in 1838. It consists of a central zinc anode dipped into a porous earthenware pot containing a zinc sulfate solution. The porous pot is, in turn, immersed in a solution of copper sulfate contained in a copper can, which acts as the cell's cathode. The use of a porous barrier allows ions to pass through but keeps the solutions from mixing."
Sure looks like the Daniell section describes the later improvement, not the original invention. Maybe someone could dig up a good source for what exactly Daniell did, and keep the descriptions from mixing? 2A02:1205:C68A:9DA0:2427:169A:4D3D:B604 (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daniell vs. Dancer 

message: The article says Franklin described a series of capacitors as a battery. But capacitors are not electrochemical cells, which is the subject of this article. Should the Franklin paragraph be deleted in favour of the person who first used the term for an electrochemical cell? Or should the Franklin reference be reduced to etymology rather than suggesting his experiment was relevant to electrochemical cells? Unfortunately, searching for the word battery in that era turns up mostly references to artillery. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 00:28, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Its WP:OR, cited to, and interpretations of, a primary source. It also seems to be WP:UNDUE, way too much Franklin in relationship to what he contributed. Sources on the matter      . Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 02:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Franklin's contribution to battery development or to the dictionary? 

message: In the article, it is said that:
 Experimentation with lithium batteries began in 1912 under G.N. Lewis, but commercial lithium batteries did not come to market until the 1970s.
However, there seem to be no direct reference that G.N. Lewis began the experimentation with lithium batteries in 1912. Also, https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/chemistry/2019/popular-information/ said that
 In the early 1970s, Stanley Whittingham used lithium’s enormous drive to release its outer electron when he developed the first functional lithium battery. 
--Plurm (talk) 19:27, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: ? - It has two references at the end of the sentence and google brings up further confirmation. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 19:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who's the first to construct the lithium battery?
Talk:Kuma (processor)

message: Actually, I'm thinking making these seperate articles redirect to AMD K8L, the main article, as they are the codenames of CPU under the K8L microarchitecture. I personally do not think these names are notable enough to start new articles, and copy text from the K8L article to be the contents. --202.71.240.18 11:02, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?