lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of hospitals in Scotland

message: I would be grateful if volunteers could edit or create the following pages so they are consistent in style: NHS Ayrshire and Arran, NHS Borders, NHS Dumfries and Galloway, NHS Fife, NHS Forth Valley, NHS Grampian, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, NHS Highland and Argyll, NHS Lanarkshire, NHS Lothian, NHS Orkney, NHS Shetland, NHS Tayside, NHS Western Isles.  Many thanks. Samantha of Cardyke 16:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NHS board pages appeal

message: Is this not part of the Western??GiollaUidir (talk) 16:05, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Glasgow Uni Med School

message: I removed David Smith Convalescent Hospital because I could find no evidence of it existing. A google search reveals nothing relevant except this article, and it is not listed on the Healthcare Improvement Scotland website. Mordac (talk) 16:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: David Smith Convalescent Hospital

message: Despite the name, this seems to be only a care home, not a hospital. It's not listed on the Healthcare Improvement Scotland website, but it is in the Care Comission's. http://www.careinspectorate.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=7644&Itemid=489&bereNextPageId=ServiceDetails_action.php&action=displayService&CaseNumber=CS2003010568
Mordac (talk) 16:55, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Carrickstone House and Day Hospital

message: i was just going to edit the Leverndale entry, as i know this is a psychiatric hospital, i have been there long ago, but i found the page had been deleted, why is this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Annekahansen (talk • contribs) 19:15, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing Leverndale.
Talk:Manchester Jewish Museum

message: In Hartwell, Clare (2001). Manchester. Pevsner Architectural Guides. London: Penguin Books. ISBN 0-14-071131-7 the date of building is given at 1889 and the same date is given by Nikolaus Pevsner (1969) for the "New Synagogue"; is there any evidence for the 1874 date?--Johnsoniensis (talk) 09:50, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The date of building is 1873-74; 1889 is not correct.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 06:28, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date
Talk:Croyde

message: Croyde does not current;y have Blue Flag Status. Here is a response from Blue Flag Org in response to an enquiry:
"The International Blue Flag Co-ordination has sent me your e-mail concerning Croyde Bay in North Devon. In 2007 Croyde Bay lost their Blue Flag status due to water quality issues (after many years of holding the award) and have not applied for a Blue Flag in 2009. Subsequently they will not be listed on any of our promotional literature. 
 
We will contact the local council immediately regarding this issue and confirm that whilst they can promote the fact that Croyde Bay obtained a Blue Flag up until 2007, they cannot mislead the public into thinking it still has this award. "  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.33.241.212 (talk) 10:03, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Blue flag

message: How is it that this article has existed for over a decade without anyone adding a single reference? KJP1 (talk) 13:39, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Incredible, really. I do love the above 2007 discussion with lots of local history. I do wish there was a folk Wiki that could collect vernacular history before it disappears. No Swan So Fine (talk) 14:31, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  14 years and still no cites!
Talk:Trinity Evangelical Divinity School

message: This article has no references but at least part of it, the history section, was copied word-for-word from the school's website. I will delete that section. Any other copyvio also should be removed. Jonathunder (talk) 15:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced and copyright violation 

message: Barker taught at TEDS around 1967-69 (& maybe some time before or after that).  After Barker taught at TEDS, he taught at Dallas Theological Seminary, & became a "Secretary" (general editor) of the NIV, which is a major translation of the Bible.  (AltheaCase (talk) 23:36, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable faculty should include Kenneth Barker
Talk:List of hospitals in England

message: This seems to be a List of NHS hospitals in England.  Does the article need to be renamed?  Views?  Millstream3 (talk) 10:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it just needs to be expanded; there are a number of non-NHS hospitals in the list.  However, dividing the list up into strategic health authorities wasn't perhaps the best of ideas (and I've no idea why London is at the top of the list and formatted differently to the rest). waggers (talk) 10:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't mind the SHA divisions (they are now coterminous with governmental areas of England) but perhaps the thing to do would be to * or † private/independent hospitals? Millstream3 (talk) 12:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds like a good plan.  A few of them have things like "(independent)" added, but using symbols is probably a better approach. waggers (talk) 20:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Old Manor Hospital in the South West area closed several years ago and has been succeeded by a new collection of wards called Fountain Way. This name makes reference to the fountain that stood (and still stands) for many decades at the entrance to the now closed Old Manor. I worked there for 25+ years and still live nearby. Richard Avery (talk) 19:09, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

text: This is going to be an enormous article! A list of just London ones Secretlondon (talk) 18:20, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope
Talk:List of Serious Games Developers

message: While it might "useful" to have a list like this, I'm concerned that it runs afoul of WP:NOT and seems like a potential spam magnet.  Thoughts?  --Alan Au 16:41, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely - there are only eleven that are notable enough to have Wikipedia articles. Both this and List of Serious Games should probably just be merged with Serious game. --McGeddon 16:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Appropriateness of list?
Talk:Birmingham Central Mosque

message: I have heard it referred to as this many times. Not sure whether it is a derogatory name or an affectionate one, like "fluzi in the jacuzzi". Anyone else know or think it is worth mentioning in the article? Villafancd (talk) 21:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Big Onion"
Talk:Utility Radio

message: "only two still exist" of the manufacturers? Not so. If you're going on "still exist, in the exact same form, making radios", the only brand around is Roberts. If you go for "still exist, at all", Bush is there - it went bankrupt in the 80s and is now an imprint of Alba. However, Cossor is owned by Raytheon, General Electric and Ferranti by Ericsson, Decca Records still operate, owned by Universal, and so on. --85.134.141.187 16:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: The Utility Set had limited reception on medium wave and lacked a longwave band to frustrate attempts at receiving foreign broadcasts The crude tuning scale listed only BBC stations.
The lack of LW was to reduce component count (the whole point of the design being to economise on scarce materials)  The necessary coils for LW would have required many turns of (scarce) copper wire. LW domestic broadcasting had been suspended during WW2 in UK and most enemy propaganda was on MW and/or SW anyway.
In complete contrast to the situation in Nazi Germany and occupied Europe Listening to foreign propaganda broadcasts (while officially discouraged) was not actually illegal in wartime Britain. Nor was there any attempt to jam such broadcasts (an exception being the "Aspidistra" transmissions intended to intrude on domestic German stations late in the war). 
Its hardly surprising that tuning dials only listing BBC stations but the set designers while not actively setting out to prevent listening to other broadcasters were hardly going to facilitate it.  176.24.162.131 (talk) 22:28, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of longwave 

message: I couldn't find a picture on Commons. Please, some collector, take a snap shot? --Wtshymanski (talk) 20:47, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request
Talk:Danielle Ammaccapane

message: Well-referenced, but there's so little biographical info that I had to mark it a stub. Wizardman 16:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Jason Crest

message: It was released in 1968.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.151.178.247 (talk) 15:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, you're right, have added. JonCTalk 15:27, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waterloo Road 

message: At least one person seems to think this band is not well known enough for a Wikipedia article. I'm not aware of the exact notability guidelines for bands, but I would keep it. I think the fact that they wrote the original for the hit song Aux Champs-Élysées alone is enough for notability. Maybe it's their only major achievement - well, in that case Joe Dassin pushed them into notability with his hipster attitude, but that makes no difference. Steinbach (talk) 20:30, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That notice has been there since 2008 and no-one's done anything about it. I think it's probably safe to remove it. — Jon C.ॐ 20:31, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doubts on notability: do keep it anyway 

message: Here it states:
"His words for "Les Champs-Elysées," published in 1969 by Intersong Music, were adapted from the English-language lyrics to the song "Waterloo Road," which was written by Michael Antony Deighan, with music by Michael Wilshaw." 
As far as I can see none of the Jason Crest's members name is Michael, so somebody outside that band has written the song. --89.204.137.137 (talk) 08:29, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did they really write that song?
Talk:Gilbert Agius

message: The article mentions that Agius was on trial with Bayern Munich at the beginning of the 2007 season. I can't find any reference to this - the only reference I found was about a trial at a Swedish club called Enköpings SK. I suggest changing this, unless anybody has any better information. Nevborg (talk) 17:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Playing career
Talk:John Morrow (American football)

message: *Strong keep this article, I would think anyone who played the NFL for eleven seasons and has benn selected twice to its All-Star team is notable... Wikipedia:Notability (people) seems to suggest so.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gypaetus (talk • contribs) 01:10, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Current (newspaper)

message: Sorry that this is such a sketchy stub.  I hadn't heard of this trade journal before, but looking at whatlinkshere it does appear to be cited in a small number of places around Wikipedia, so there probably should be some kind of article here.
The paper's own website says the newspaper publishes biweekly and it's been going for about 25 years.  I'm not adding that as yet because I'd prefer to find an independent source for information about Current. Please bear with me. --Tony Sidaway 17:07, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sketchy

message: Please see the above section for an explanation of the sketchiness of the stub.  I created this stub because the paper in question is an important trade journal within public service broadcasting in the United States.  I've got more time on my hands than I had in April and I'll be happy to expand it. --Tony Sidaway 19:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Speedy delete was removed in accordance with normal practice.  No hard feelings about the tag, I hope; at the time it was placed, the article had no references and a link to the newspaper if I remember correctly.  Spa toss 19:21, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contested speedy
Talk:Saxa (food product)

message: Will someone please explain why Saxa is unencylopedic?  I'm not saying whether it is or isn't, however no reason has been given as to why it is unencylopedic. Salinae 23:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't work that way.  We need to find references establishing that the subject of the article is encyclopedic according to the WP:N and WP:V guidelines.  If you feel that the subject meets those criteria, then remove the deletion notice from the article. —Psychonaut 23:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the deletion notice since in my opinion Saxa salt satisifes WP:N since: it is the subject of a Hornby railway carriage; it's livery is used on a full size wagon; and it's mentioned in A short history of British Television Advertising by the National Media Museum.  Note that although the Hornby wagon and the real wagon carry SAXA advertising, they are not produced by RHM so they are independent.Salinae 22:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

message: Generally images perk wiki pages up, but in this case with so little text wouldn't the article read as an advertisement?  - Steve3849 talk 14:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  response to photo suggestion tag
Talk:Jackie Fargo

message: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rwCir9sL5fs/TvujKu9hFAI/AAAAAAAAAk0/vEnca7PcrwA/s1600/donfargopotbust.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MisterJayEm (talk • contribs) 03:12, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Army Group Upper Rhine

message: I made some changes in the article to clear up terminology.  English language sources refer to this command as an "Army Group".  This is an improper translation (the German term for army group is Heeresgruppe). Oberkommando means "High Command", and as such, OB Oberrhein was at the same level in the German command structure as OB West.  In the article, I refer to the command as "Army Group Oberrhein" because that is how it is commonly referred to in English-language sources, such as Riviera to the Rhine, but the true echelon of the command and its implications are mentioned.  The article's former use of "Army Group Upper Rhine" has been discontinued as this is nothing more than a direct translation of the command's name, although it is sometimes seen in literature as well.  As well, the use of Oberrhein in the article versus "Upper Rhine" follows the lead of the article's title.
Additionally, the command relationship of OB Oberrhein to OKW and Hitler are now brought out in the article's lead paragraph.
Cheers, --W. B. Wilson (talk) 10:10, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Command vs Army Group
Talk:Gio González

message: The page name does not include the accent, but the name at the start of the page does. Which is it? – Muboshgu (talk) 20:13, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Gonzalez" or "González" 
Talk:Federal University of Surrey

message: I've ensured the info is in Roehampton University and suggest this page is deleted as it was only a temporary name for the university. SuzanneKn 17:12, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've rewritten the article based on some previous text and added references. I suggest the page is retained as it was a University body for several years. Just because something doesn't exist anymore doesn't make it not notable enough. And the University of Surrey was part of the federation as well remember, not just the institution now known as Roehampton University. Chriswiki 16:39, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Vinci, Tuscany

message: I am not familiar with Roman numerals (XII) being used to represent centuries. Is this a known convention or should it be changed to standard Arabic (12th)?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.10.26 (talk) 11:41, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a style that's used quite a lot in historical circles - and Italians in particular are quite keen on it which is why you see it a lot in en.wiki articles about Italy.  But the Wikipedia house style is to use Arabic - see WP:DATES#Longer periods FlagSteward (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roman numerals 
Talk:Johnny Olszewski

message: I think he was known as "Johnny O" and wore number Zero for the Lions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.121.16.240 (talk) 06:13, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nickname
Talk:St Margaret's Church, Prestwich

message: The article is probably too long and is full of detail that is more relevant to members of the Church of England than the general reader.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 05:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: General tone

message: I have mentioned the war graves in the Churchyard Extension (as it is called in the CWGC Cemetery Report that is my citation).  Not being local, I ask if someone could elaborate if the Extension directly adjoins the primary churchyard or is a detached extension.Cloptonson (talk) 22:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Churchyard
Talk:Chorlton tram stop

message: Metrolink name for this stop is now just Chorlton (source The Link 3), theyve dropped the 'cum-hardy' bit for obvious reasons. Question is since this page also refers to the former station should it be renamed or not? WatcherZero (talk) 03:48, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good Question. And of course the third option would be two articles, one for the old Chorlton-cum-Hardy station, and one for the new Metrolink station. I think this is a question for WT:GM, so I'll move the discussion there. -- Fursday 08:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Metrolink Name change 

message: I've updated the services section, and in it mentioned that the last north-bound terminate at Piccadilly. I'm struggling to find a reference on the metrolink website for this though, even though this fact is clearly marked on the platform noticeboards at the station.
Does anybody have any citable information regarding an increase in tram frequencies prior to the airport expansion also? My own original research (and therefore unusable - I was chatting to a few Metrolink staff) suggests that plans to extend frequencies to 6 minutes are presently under consideration based on passenger numbers since completion, but if anybody has any references to this then please feel free to add. -- Fursday 16:00, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Services section 
Talk:Manon Batiste

message: Can someone upload a picture of the famous fictious French heroine? ESommers 17:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I will as soon as I figure out how to make a profile box. Can someone possibly do that for me? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bwing55543 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manon's pic 

message: This article is essentially a fairly decent level-by-level decription of Medal of Honor: Underground - an article which could sorely do with just such a description. I think this page should be deleted and its contents merged into the other one. 82.30.240.26 (talk) 17:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note Wikipedia:Merge and delete.  Best, --A NobodyMy talk 20:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

text: A Nobody or whomever, please offer a substantial rationale on this talk page for retaining this page -- the real-world treatment of which is fleeting and negligible. I made a bold edit with a note on this talk page, you reverted it -- but where's your response to the discussion? --EEMIV (talk) 16:34, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: She is one out of millions of game characters based on an actual historical figure worthy of an article as well and is a playable character in a major game series covered by multiple reliable sources.  Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 16:37, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion 

message: Please don't remove the quotes from reference, they are part of the citation system. We don't have a crystal ball to see what the future holds and what website will be around next year, let alone in 50 years. A person shou;dnt have to read an entire article just to see if the fact is really justified by the text, this is one more step in ensuring it does. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:53, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, didn't see you there. I was going through template-ing and thought I'd errantly left a quote in. I removed it because the quote refers to one snippet of detail, but it stands there to substantiate two claims; one claim was "out in the cold." In general, I tend not to see the quote= field used much (and it wasn't elsewhere in the article), so I went through and axed it. If you feel like quote=ing all the sources, go for it. --EEMIV (talk) 23:56, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes in references
Talk:GWR 4900 Class 5972 Olton Hall

message: The paragraph headed preservation reads as if the locomotive went directly from Woodhams to NRM Shildon and was then based there for a long time.  Was this the case?  I think not.  The only source I can easily find says it went to Procor in Wakefield then Carnforth. Skinner doc (talk)   —Preceding undated comment added 20:30, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preservation NRM Shildon 

message: Hallo, bei mir wird übersetzt das die "1937" im April "5972" gebaut wurde, kann man das irgendwie beheben sodass dann dort steht die 5972 wurde im April 1937 gebaut ??? Tom Stopp (talk) 13:03, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but my German doesn't extend that far. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:29, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Falsche Übersetzung
Talk:Jet (British band)

message: There should be a disambiguation at the top specifically regarding the Aussie band Jet. In most articles where there are two bands named exactly the same there is usually some explanation of what the latter band had to do to use the same name. (I don't know the story behind the two Jets or I would put it in here. Someone must know it, though.) Mseanbrown (talk) 20:05, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cross Street Chapel

message: Please note that the coordinates in this article need fixing as:
Decimal 53.4817, -2.2444*
:Should be OK now. Deor (talk) 01:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates 

message: Not entirely comfortable, as a member of this congregation, with being listed under those categories. Is it an historical reference? Because currently, Cross Street is one of the most diverse Unitarian chapels in the country, and the least heavily Christian I know of in the north-west. (Also, remind me to link the chapel website as a citation for Jane's ministry; I keep forgetting.)
- 05:49, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: "It is a member of the General Assembly of Unitarian and Free Christian Churches". "The building was renamed the Cross Street Chapel and became a Unitarian meeting-house c.1761". 1761 is well within UU's Christian days, that alone puts this within the scope of WikiProject Christianity. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 21:42, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christianity articles?