Talk:Bartolo Longo

message: We need to avoid spreading these ridiculous urban legends as facts and present Longo's religious claims in the proper context.  Predestiprestidigitation (talk) 20:11, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Once again the article has been edited to state that "Satanic priests" and "Satan-worship" are real things 

message: I think this article has improved in wording, tone, sourcing and objectivity that some of the issue tags can be removed. If other users feel differently, please feel free to state what additional changes should occur here. Otherwise, consensus will be assumed. CoffeeGiraffe (talk) 21:40, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording, tone and objectivity 

message: Thanks for correcting my mistake there -- there should probably be a concise explanation up front as to what his status was with the Dominicans. I understand that lay members of the order did and still do exist, but this is probably a concept that needs clarification (and specificity as to what it entailed for Longo). Predestiprestidigitation (talk) 19:09, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Not all Third Orders, and not all Third Order Dominicans, are lay.  --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 02:07, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non monk 

message: I have updated the article with additional citations, but agree more citations would be very helpful. I would disagree that the page should be deleted. This is a person of veneration of a major world religion, which I think is sufficient reason for the article's existence. Religion is always a touchy subject, but I don't think the references to Satanism should be wholly dismissed. The subject of the article described himself as a "Satanic priest" and that is sufficient for him to be referred to as a (former) Satanic priest. It would be unwise for contributors to start determining who is a part of what religion, as we then lose our objectivity. It would also be helpful to have those who can speak Italian contribute, as a vast majority of the sources that could be used are not in English. CoffeeGiraffe (talk) 18:18, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Beatification is part of the process. See "Blessed Miguel Pro" article as an example. I'm pretty sure that policy has already been established. The saint infobox should remain.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CoffeeGiraffe (talk • contribs) 18:38, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

text: I disagree here that references to the Catholic Herald newspaper should be deleted. The solution should be to search for additional references to confirm or dispute the Catholic Herald's characterization of the subject, not to just outright delete it as "nonsense". Good Ol’factory (talk) 00:37, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bartolo Longo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141027201739/http://campus.udayton.edu:80/mary/meditations/pompei.html to http://campus.udayton.edu/mary/meditations/pompei.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:27, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified