lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Creation account(s) in Genesis

message: because there are two POVs regarding the text in question: 1 asserts that there is one account, and 1 asserts that there are two accounts.  previously, the page was called ACCOUNTS.  it is now called ACCOUNT(S).  it is clearly more npov.  you are wrong, and i am going to put the page back up.
:The question is Why did you add this page rather than simply suggest renaming the Creation accounts in Genesis page?
::because, sir, i could not imagine anyone disputing the POV nature of the title as it stood, and i STILL can't imagine why you are disputing it now.
:::I am not disputing the article title, but rather the existance of this page. THIS PAGE, not the title of Creation accounts in Genesis.
:::Please also note that a discussion on page title changes requires at least 48 hours before acting on it, in order to allow interested parties in different time zones to comment and reach a concensus. CheeseDreams 00:28, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: okay, whatever.  i've proposed it, so now hopefully everybody can agree and we'll move on.  Ungtss 00:33, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  WHY I ADDED THIS PAGE:

message: This page has been created by an editor whose edits produce extremely POV articles. It is set up as an attack on the page Creation accounts in Genesis.
The existance of this page in opposition to that page is extremely POV. If the title needs changing, or the content needs changing, then the original article ought to be changed, after discussion on its talk page, NOT set up a rival page.
Please do not redirect this page. There isn't a page that links here, and no-one is going to search for the phrase with brackets.
---
I suggest everyone just cool their jets for a few days.  If there is no system reason for immediate action, there is no hurry to act on this speedy deletion, is there?  We can talk this through on Talk:Creation accounts in Genesis.  This page was created because of those bold things that we all do as NewPersons.  Let's not bite bold NewPersons to Wikipedia, please!  :))  Everythink is O K.  And this inappropriate conversation on the MainPage will not offend readers, in my opinion--because the broken links to here have minimal impact on readers.  ---Rednblu | Talk 02:46, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  From main article page
Talk:White Light/White Heat

message: Infobox gives the second single as simply I Heard Her Call My Name with no flip side. The Sundazed box gives this as a cancelled single (no catalog number) with White Light/White Heat itself as the flip. The Wikipedia discography gives Here She Comes Now. Any idea? MartinSFSA (talk) 16:46, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single two
Talk:14:59

message: Whoever wrote the synopsis for this album clearly was not aware of the two Sugar Ray albums that preceded this.  They said that "New Direction" was a heavy metal track atypical of Sugar Ray.  No, Sugar Ray were, up until this album, strictly a hard rock band.  This track is VERY typical of Sugar Ray up until this point.  An objective reviewer would have pointed out that the REST of the album is in fact atypical of Sugar Ray, but would come to be the style they were known for and pursued from this point on.  "Fly" was the only song on the last album that wasn't hard rock, and since it became a hit, Sugar Ray toned down their style to suit a more pop-rock radio audience.
-koval-
:That writeup's pretty embarrassingly journalistic. I tagged it for cleanup ages ago...guess I should just do it myself, one of these days...Chubbles 06:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Human cannonball

message: I am removing the statement:
:A human cannonball will usually lose about two inches from their height whenever they are fired. The loss in height comes from the backbone being compressed.
because it is unclear what they mean. Is this a momentary, maximum amount of compression? -- 64.9.238.124 21:06, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two inches? 

message: It seems odd that the distance of the previous record is given, but not the distance of the current record.
This article lists the previous record for the farthest human cannonball as 200 feet.  According to the Guiness Book Of World Records website, the farthest distance for a human fired from a cannon is 59.05 m (193 ft 8.8 in) by David Marvin Smith Jr (USA) on the set of Lo Show Dei Record, in Milan, Italy, on 10 March 2011.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.87.185 (talk) 00:25, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Record Distance? 

message: I think it should have a section of its own, and will write one. Linking to the cannon article is entirely inappropriate, since only the word is common. (There is not a single mention of the cannons human cannonballs use in that article, I checked)
Feel free to improve upon what I am about to add, 90.229.34.175 (talk) 07:09, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  the cannon used by a human cannonball 

message: I found the following source: The Mar 1, 1945 issue of The Milwaukee Journal, where Victoria Zacchini is interviewed, and the workings of the "cannon" built by her father is detailed. 
http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=arUWAAAAIBAJ&sjid=JCMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2807%2C346834  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.229.34.175 (talk) 08:40, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New source 

message: Should The Straight Dope be counted as an acceptable source for this article? The article which is cited has no citations in it and is not a scholarly source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.87.226.184 (talk) 23:30, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Straight Dope as source?
Talk:Crest of a Knave

message: 1. The album is listed as "hard rock".  In the liner notes to the 2005 remaster, Ian says that it is not.
2. The "Themes" section starts with the sentence "Tull's frank treatment of sexuality was unabated, however. "  This seems that something should proceed it, or it should be rewritten.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 01:18, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  two things 

message: The links to tullpress.com in the references section no longer work. I'd delete them if I could figure out how.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kemoly (talk • contribs) 17:49, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  tullpress.com 
Talk:Catfish Rising

message: I cannot find anything in Google that references this, other than mirrors of Wikipedia. There are no online reliable sources on this as far as I can tell. I think it should be kept, though, because it's probably true, just not easily verifiable. Surely there are some offline sources on this? How does one go about obtaining offline sources? How are books verifiable if the reader of the Wikipedia page doesn't have the book to hand? --h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 21:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed this section per WP:BLP - it'd been up there for two and a half years, was added by an IP, and no citation could be found. That should have been removed long ago.--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 17:35, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The section on "Roll Yer Own" on the radio, and Ian Anderson being sent out of the studio
Talk:Matija Antun Relković

message: This was created basically as part of a wider effort regarding Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Catholic Serbs... --Joy [shallot] 22:59, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's becaise surnames with -lk- are far less frequent than those with -ljk- (-lk- being a sort of Russian or Ukrainian form), so that people automatically wrote "Reljković". No conscious effort (unlike Spljet, Deonice, Bjelostjenac/Belostenec,..). Mir Harven 17:53, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide

message: The sentence "Solutions of NAD+ are colorless and stable for about a week at 4 °C and neutral pH, but decompose rapidly in acids or alkalis. Upon decomposition, they form products that are enzyme inhibitors.[5]" is incorrect. The cited article refers to NADH solutions. According to Sigma Aldrich, NAD+ "Aqueous solutions between pH 2 - 6, stored as single-use aliquots at -70 °C, are stable for at least 6 months. Neutral or slightly acidic solutions are stable at 0 °C for at least 2 weeks." (https://www.sigmaaldrich.com/content/dam/sigma-aldrich/docs/Sigma/Product_Information_Sheet/2/n8285pis.pdf)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.206.155.2 (talk) 05:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information about NAD+ solutions is incorrect
Talk:Genesis creation narrative

message: Make sure the 'G's in 'God' are capitalized. Goober112 (talk) 22:27, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Per MOS:GOD (and just regular English grammar), when god is used as a common noun and not as a title, it should not be capitalised. If there's a specific occurrence that is incorrect, you should open a new edit request referencing that instance.  Liu1126 (talk) 23:01, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 20 March 2024 

message: Question isn't that whole 2 creation myths based on the whole Documentary hypothesis? Hasn't the consensus for the documentary hypothesis collapsed since the 1970s?CycoMa1 (talk) 16:56, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, the documentary hypothesis has fallen out of favor, but I don't think anyone is saying that there is only 1 narrative. The Documentary Hypothesis' basic idea (that the Pentateuch was derived from different sources later edited together) hasn't been completely repudiated; the popular alternatives are all variations of the original theory. Ltwin (talk) 17:11, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

text: The Documentary hypothesis argued that the Pentateuch is a compilation of four source documents, and that at least one of them was as old as the 10th century BCE(!). The consensus collapsed due to a view that the Pentateuch is "a compilation of short, independent narratives" rather than a synthesis of extensive works, and that the editing process took place not in the Kingdoms of Israel or Judah but in either the Achaemenid Empire (5th-4th century BCE) or the  Hellenistic period (4th century-1st century BCE). In other words, the Pentateuch's sources were more fragmented than the Documentary hypothesis believed, and the Pentateuch itself is not as old as the Documentary hypothesis believed. Dimadick (talk) 08:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 creation narratives
Category talk:Deities

message: Starting a discussion about gender-based categorization on WP:CFD that may be of interest to watchers of this category. -- Beland 23:21, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and did some reorganizing. Not trying to step on anyone's toes, but this has been on CFD for a long time and looks to be getting nowhere. -Aranel ("Sarah") 22:41, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Steam beer

message: Both ale and lager yeasts settle on the bottom after fermenting. Top fermenting vs bottom fermenting are confusing terms that do not add to the article. In any case it's factually incorrect to claim that ale yeasts "settle on top"
83.250.98.32 (talk) 09:31, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a source for that?  There are plenty (and one is long-included here) to say the opposite.  I'm not a lager brewer, but the yeasts I am familiar with are top fermenting and produce a floating crust that is (apocryphally), "thick enough for a rat to run across the top". Andy Dingley (talk) 10:55, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure: Papazian, The New Complete Joy of Homebrewing, page 81. Kräuzen is not the same as settling, all yeasts eventually flocculate and settle on the bottom.
83.250.98.32 (talk) 14:53, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: "Top-fermenting" and "bottom-fermenting" are historical terms that date back to the 16th and 17th centuries, when a new strain of yeast in Bavaria, and a new way of aging beer in cold cellars produced a style known as "tollbier" or "tolles bier". The behaviour of the new yeast was called "bottom-fermenting" (as opposed to the "top-fermenting" yeast used since prehistoric times) because of lower krausening during fermentation (due to the colder fermentation temperatures). In 1841, Anton Dreher the Younger, using bottom-fermenting yeast provided by his friend Gabriel Sedelmayr II of Spaten Brewery in Munich, coined the term "lagerbier" ("stored beer") to describe his new "Schwechater Lagerbier". While the actions of both strains of yeast are similar, "bottom-fermenting" has come to mean lager yeast (Saccahromyces pastorianus), while top fermenting refers to ale yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Steam beer is a "hybrid" -- a beer produced with lager yeast (bottom-fermenting) but fermented warm like ale. Likewise but in reverse, altbier and kolsch use ale yeast, but fermented cold like lagers. (From my course BREW1104 History of Beer and Brewing, offered at Niagara College, Canada as part of the Brewmaster and Brewery Operations Management program.) Guinness323 (talk) 18:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top fermenting vs bottom fermenting 

message: Basic information to add to this article:  who first described California beer as "common," where, and when. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 01:39, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Green Monster (automobile)

message: The most famous Green Monster was definitely not a dragster !
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ericd (talk • contribs).
When Art Arfons was in the news, either Datsun or Toyota created one of the best television commercials I've ever seen, featuring the Green Monster and their car, drag racing on the salt flats. I would love to find a copy of that commercial.
Lyle 23:09, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Top secret" is quite low, as security clearances go. It's entirely usual for line mechanics on particular pieces of sensitive equipment to need such access. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:06, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The talk section is not up to the normal format of most other Talk pages. We should do something about this.
M0ntenegro (talk) 18:51, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk Section needs refurbishment/work 

message: This is an 1968 photo of the front spoiler equipped "Green Monster" at Bonneville Salt Flats, as found in a hungarian online image archive:
https://fortepan.hu/en/photos/?id=170917 92.249.156.1 (talk) 19:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green monster with front spoiler.
Talk:List of superficial anatomical features

message: I've removed the entries for upper eyelid and lower eyelid. I don't think we are ever likely to have articles on these; Add them when we do. As the person who added these is currently arguing to delete the page, I suspect he's not about to create them. Some of his other additions are helpful however. Andrewa 23:46, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: The pastern of a horse is the joint that is homologous with the human ankle. If we use human analogies, a horse, being digitigrade, is like a human walking on tiptoe with the sole of the foot almost vertical and the ankle permanently off the ground, and the whole foot made longer and slimmer so that it more or less in line with the rest of the leg.
Johnson's distionary defines "pastern" as the "the knee of a horse," and when queried as to why he defined it that way he is said to have replied "ignorance, madam, sheer ignorance." 
The location of the pastern is such that it does look a little like a knee, except that it bends backwards, and there is of course a real knee higher on the horse's leg. Dpbsmith (talk) 14:54, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pastern 

message: For the vfd debate related to this article see Talk:List of superficial anatomical features/delete -- Graham  ☺ | Talk 14:39, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  VfD debate
Talk:Michel Legrand

message: I'm almost certain Legrand died some time ago. Does anyone have his date of death? His musical production seems to have ceased in the late 1990s. JFW | T@lk 23:48, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am not familiar with Legrand, but I started an article for the album Noel! Noel!! Noel!!!. Feel free to add information relating to this album to the article. --Another Believer (Talk) 04:52, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Noel! Noel!! Noel!!!'' 

message: Does this article still need the "Additional sources needed" tag? It has eighteen references and a number of external links. Vorbee (talk) 18:55, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Much of the text is unsourced. The worst section is "Awards", which doesn't have a single source. To get anywhere near RD in WP:ITN, a lot more sources would be needed, i.e. basically everything. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:03, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I've split disco and awards and removed most of the name dumps and some pov. I've sourced the rest, I think, but the refs are almost bare, just urls and titles. As I'm mostly drunk right now, I'm going to bed. Isa (talk) 08:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Does this article still need additional sources tag?

message: The Hindu describes him as a "jazz pianist" and this is also given as his occupation in the info box, but there is very little in the article supporting this. Is there any more available? Martinevans123 (talk) 10:05, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Jazz pianist" 

message: His major awards seem to be all listed in the infobox. But there are no sources. Although the separate Discograohy article lists his awards in detail they seem to be unsourced there also. Is this ok? Martinevans123 (talk) 10:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I see they have now been restored. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards 

message: I will remove this as it redirects to a completely non-related page. Deliusfan (talk) 17:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website is no longer functioning
Talk:Rohonczi Codex

message: Here is the text from the last edit before revertion:
2 other pages http://www.intellact.com/o.jpg
and reading of this http://www.intellact.com/72.wav
Another ocurences of dragolica writing system
http://kabardians.com/gallery/script1.jpg
there are other shorter description on, gold vase now at Hermitage, silver digout from Ukraina.
Anyway, the links he provided seem really doubtful. Still, I tried checking it out. A google search on "Dragolica" truned up nothing.
# Hahh realy 
 And the root site of his third link is some kind of horse site. Will anyone shed some light on this? Cal 1234 05:02, Feb 4, 2005 (UTC)
# and What the hourse did say ????? :)  
----
What to do in case like this ?  
In mather almost nobody understand evrything appers to be doubtful. 
Just is by definition of the word doubtful.
Check the meaning of the word 
http://www.answers.com/doubtfoul&r=67
Google is not searching yet all old sources so ... wait and please be more patient. The mater is at least few hundred yars old and nobody criticaly thinking will expect to get all references in single google search. Is it?
: Wikipedia has a policy of no original research -- that we should only post information that was published in respectable sources, such as books, scientific journals, etc. I assume yours is not, therefore it is doubtful.Bogdan | Talk 09:11, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia should be based on NPOV. Your sense is Your point of view. Do you need a research paper to see what is obviously similar? re: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rohonczi_Codex&oldid=10649732. That is as much as is given for now - who wana get more??. Read this codex by hart, and in oposite direction:) or turn the book upside down :))) "Mądrej głowie dość dwie słowie". 
It's all about sensitivity, when someone sense cannot sense essence. 
Rohoncz is the little town Rechnitz, in Austria !
Source:
Location: Rechnitz (Austria)
X: 1830100m Y: 5960700m 
Lat: 47:18:20N (47.3056) Lon: 16:26:25E (16.4404) 
Web Address: www.multimap.com/map/browse.cgi?lat=47.3056&lon=16.4404&scale=20000000&icon=x 
S.D., 09.02.2005
That is true. However, in 1907 it was part of Hungary. Only after WWI, it passed to Austria. However I'll mention it in the article. Bogdan | Talk 07:15, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Doubtful sources

message: I studied the Codex from Rohonc extensively. Since I put all my findings on a site, I ask the administrators of this page to take a look at my blog and put an external link to it, if they think it is worth it. I think it has additional information and would be interesting for anybody who is researching the Codex. I tried to do this myself but I understand this violates the Wikipedia policies. Not my intention. So please, take a look http://rohonczcodex.wordpress.com.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.101.65.35 (talk) 10:35, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link
Talk:Jean-Joseph Rabearivelo

message: The story told here is incompatible with Esther Razanadrasoa. She died having an abortion whilst this article tells of a wife named Mary with their 5 children and no mention of Esther dying in 1931 as a result of a pregnancy with this man. He also translated her poetry. Something seems amiss with this FA. Victuallers (talk) 15:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think my sources on Esther are reliable. I was also surprised she was not mentioned in the article on Rabearivelo. He was only 17 when he first came in contact with her and he later reported that she was largely responsible for his literary success. Looks as if further work is needed.--Ipigott (talk) 16:01, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  No doubt and I guess the research thrown up by the Swiss writer will cast more light. I don't like to just amend the FA as I'm guessing someone ) did a lot of work. Victuallers (talk) 16:34, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem

message: The article mentions that Rabearivelo was born in Ambatofotsy, north of Antananarivo. But the link goes to a village that clearly lies south of Antananarivo. Is the map of the Ambatofotsy article wrong, or does the link here go to another town than the Ambatofotsy in which Rabearivelo was born? Tanzania (talk) 10:42, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambatofotsy
Talk:Alan Shearer

message: Hi,	
I am contacting you to ask if I can make a modification to your page. With the introduction of the new Premier League Hall of Fame. I believe a valid inclusion to Alan's profile would be for him to have an Honours section below his "Team Managed Section" in his profile which would include his induction in the Hall of Fame, further attributing to his greatness as a Footballer. As a case study in American Sports, the same formula is used on different athletes profiles on their designated Wikipedia Pages if indeed they are selected as Hall of Famers.
Example
}} Junefith (talk) 20:44, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Shearer's inclusion in the Hall of Fame is already listed in the "Honours" section, it's in the "Individual" sub-section. Can you spot it? Robby.is.on (talk) 21:43, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

text: Already done ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:55, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 April 2021
Talk:Rabies (Skinny Puppy album)

message: I removed the External Links section as they didn't work anymore. Greg Birdsall 22:31, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I seem to recall that this works in material from one of the Lard tracks (Jello Biafra and various people from the RevCo "tribe").  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  11:39, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It came to me: A substantial amount of "Spahn Dirge" is a loose cover of Lard's "Time to Melt" (including those lyrics, "time to melt"), from The Power of Lard (also 1989, though both bands seem to have been playing this live for a while as a jam-session kind of thing; it has a lot of psychedelic and early heavy metal influences, a bit of a pastiche, really).  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ<  11:46, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Spahn Dirge" 

message: Here's a list of references with info on Rabies:
* 
* 
* 
* 
*  
* 
CelestialWeevil (talk) 01:36, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: another http://litany.prongs.org/index.php?topic=8805.msg538808#msg538808 CelestialWeevil (talk) 17:36, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  More references