lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Count of Holland

message: Why is Charles II, King of Spain and V, Holy Roman Emperor listed here as Charles II? I presume as Charles II, Duke of Burgundy but neither the article on Charles nor the list of dukes of Burgundy in the Burgundy article mentions him as duke of Burgundy? Was he? Rmhermen 15:55, Oct 4, 2003 (UTC)
:He's Charles II of Holland (Charles the Bold was Charles I). Apparently, the duchy of Burgundy reverted to the king of France after the death of Mary of Burgundy. (I don't know if that meant that the duchy stopped existing, or that the French king was also the duke of Burgundy.) Eugene van der Pijll 16:24, 4 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: * Do any sources refer to him as Charles II? Marcocapelle (talk) 20:37, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: whats it about?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.205.218 (talk) 17:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: what is this

message: It seems that the counts we call Floris are more commonly known in English as Florence. For example, virtually every work about the Scottish succession struggle in the 1290s names the count who claimed the kingdom Florence, not Floris. I am beginning to think that we ought to rename these articles. Surtsicna (talk) 20:33, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Floris or Florence? 

message: The tables are useful but the text is largely a very poor summary of County of Holland. Shouldn't we remove the text here altogether? Marcocapelle (talk) 20:33, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strip the text?
Talk:Outline of meals

message: Outlines on Wikipedia are a type of list article. Each outline is about the subject identified after "Outline of" in the title. "Outline" refers to the format of the article...
"Outline" is short for "hierarchical outline". There are two types of outlines: sentence outlines (like those you made in school to plan a paper), and topic outlines (like the topical synopses that professors hand out at the beginning of a college course). In Wikipedia outlines, the hierarchy is maintained through the use of heading levels and indented bullets.
Outlines on Wikipedia are primarily topic outlines that serve 2 main purposes: they provide taxonomical classification of subjects showing what topics belong to a subject and how they are related to each other (via their placement in the tree structure).  They also serve as subject-based tables of contents linked to topics in the encyclopedia. See Wikipedia:Outlines for a more in-depth explanation. The Transhumanist 16:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brief explanation of Wikipedia outlines 
Talk:Divine (disambiguation)

message: On another page, I read:
:Edward Fowler (1632 - August 26, 1714), English divine...
What is a "divine"? This page should tell us! (and much of the current material could perhaps be cut) -- Tarquin 16:44, 4 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question.  The problem here is that wikipedia has many articles imported from the 1911 Britannica without the terminology being updated.  The meaning when describing a person is a cleric or priest - see Divine (noun).--JBellis 20:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clergyman 

message: What is wayism and why is it included on this page.  Who or what is a Pictureuploader.  Can this reference be removed?
:'wayism' (if I have the reference correct) has come up on a couple of different science fiction TV shows (most recently "Andromeda") and is usually some riff on new age/taoist beliefs.  the word 'tao' translates as 'the way', and the word itself - if not the actual philosophy behind it - has been translated over into mainstream new age thinking.  this can certainly be removed, along with the reference to Divine (the transvestite entertainer), and when  I integrate this into the divinity section (assuming it meets no opposition) I can do that.
:'pictureuploader' I don't see - that might be some Wiki specific thing going on.  where on the page are you finding that?Ted 22:24, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional religion of Wayism worships 

message: since the content on this page is quite sparse (and either overlaps what is on the divinity page, or is mere disambiguation, I've decided to simply redirect this page over to Divinity.  I don't see any loss in that move.  disagreements?
:I agree completely. GfloresTalk 19:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree.--Commander Keane 07:19, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree as well. I think I'll be bold and do this. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 03:12, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Car Satellite Radio

message: Created page for feedback from peer review.  
1)  Is this content assimilated page appropriate for the encyclopedia format?  Users have to clink links for information.
2)  Vague on copyright?  Links refer to articles that are in the blockquotes, giving credit to site.  Do I need permission of every article and site that is in page?
3)  Article does not flow, is a hodgepodge of info.  Users have heard about satellite radio, but really don't know what it is.  Theme of background and online shopping I believe is relevant to page.  Knowing what it is is mute, how do I make a smart shopping decision for purchase.  How do I research subject online and then purchase.
4)  I see a need for a page on car satellite radio in the radio category, but I'm not sure if this is the appropriate page or style (blog) to fill need.
:I think we might be able to use some of the articles under fair use. However, I think we would be better off if we summarized the information in the articles rather than copying from them. (Note that this is not legal advice and is given by a non-lawyer) -- Mattworld 20:13, 4 Oct 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Paramount Records

message: I know that there was a Paramount Records label in Australia in the 1920s with a different design of label... anyone know the relationship (if any) to USA Paramount?  Wondering simply, -- Infrogmation 17:25, 4 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't imagine there is any connection at all. -Freekee 03:48, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:ParamountLabelBLJefferson.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 19:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:ParamountLabelBLJefferson.jpg

message: The current wording is "Paramount offered recordings of standard pop-music fare, on records initially recorded with average audio fidelity pressed in average quality shellac, but with the coming of electric recording, both the audio fidelity and shellac quality went downhill to well below average." Doe this mean that their quality did not go down, but that everyone else's quality went up, and Paramount did not keep pace? -Freekee (talk) 02:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  relative quality? 
Talk:Gjakova

message: So what you are saying is that people with Albanians names are not Albanian ? but people with Slavic, Christian names are not Albanian either ? It seems more plausible that an Albanian also bore a Christian name and even possibly a Slavic name considering they came under such influence, of course the opposite could also happen but the occupation was Slavic (Serbs, Bulgars) and not Albanian. For example the Shipshani in North-East Albania, just next to Gjakova, which we know were Albanian and part of the Gashi tribe had in fact majority Slavic names in 1485 and only one Albanian name. Also the Morina tribe are next to Gjakova and were in fact mentioned with Albanian names . So it seems plausible the villages around Gjakova were Albanians too as they had a lot of Albanian and Christian names, Slavic names are present but mixed with Albanian. Some villages in other defters had Slavic names majority but with Albanian names present while some others had majority Albanian names etc etc. 
I mean that the area of Gjakova has had an Albanian majority is certainly supported by later historians and defters such as for the Has region between Gjakova and Prizren which did in fact have majority Albanian names according to the 16th century defter + Pjeter Mazreku who specifically mentioned it as Albanian . or for example various sources that mention Prizren and Peja within Albania or the Turkish traveller Evliya Celebi later. But at least we agree names are always open to doubt. But it seems to me that people here want Kosove and Dardania to still be connected to Serbs despite Albanians are obviously connected to the territories history but there it is almost not allowed to write anything about Albanians here , in other languages in wikipedia anything about Albanians in this territory gets immediately removed, it's a big no no, while Serbian nationalism is promoted by sources which do not have any kind of historical validation. What's even more insulting is how they use the Serbian names despite these areas haven't had Serbs it seems for a long time. What supports further that the area of Gjakova was majority Albanian for a long time is the name 'Dukagjin' or Dukagjini Plataeu which i nfact is an Albanian name , the Serbs changed it later to Metohija. I'm sure if the Serbs made the majority here for that long they would have their own name for Western Kosovo and not use some made up 19th-20th century name , as for the name Kosovo, that is only some small field in the eastern part, names of towns such as Nish, Scupi/Shkupi, Shtip, Lipjan etc etc are by various linguists considered to be non-Slavic for example. TheCreatorOne (talk) 19:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  ...
Talk:Commodore (rank)

message: Rm the external link; it was an extremely POV/OR essay on how great the UK ranking system was, and how other countries' ranking systems as deviations from it were "wrong, stupid, pointless, and confusing". It adds nothing to the article. --SigPig |SEND - OVER 20:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Emperor's New Clothes" link 

message: I can't make out what is meant by "Non-English-speaking nations often use the rank of flotilla admiral or counter admiral or senior captain as an equivalent, although the latter may also correspond to rear admiral.".  If they are non-English speaking, they are most unlikely to use English terms for their ranks, as this description would require.  Does it mean "Non-English-speaking nations often do not use a separate term for a rank equivalent to that of commodore, but one adapted from the next senior or junior rank, which might be translated as for example "flotilla admiral", "counter admiral" or "senior captain". Diomedea Exulans (talk) 17:23, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Equivalents

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Commodore (rank and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 27#Commodore (rank until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:59, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Commodore (rank" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Geography of the Bahamas

message: Yes Queen Slay.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.204.38.251 (talk) 16:35, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

message: Are the Bahamas considered to be in the Caribbean Sea?  Are the Bahamas considerd to be part of the West Indies?   Or what? Hmains 23:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  where? 

message: "as of late 1987, the last one to strike was Hurricane David in September 1979."
This statement is laughably outdated. Can anyone come up with the last hurricane to strike the Bahamas? Kelisi (talk) 23:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated content
Talk:Macedonia (region)

message: Nikola0505 (talk) 00:48, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 09:45, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 March 2022 

message: there's no such country as republic of macedonia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.176.141.43 (talk) 02:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  there's no such country as republic of macedonia 

message: 89.19.89.11 (talk) 16:49, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:53, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 August 2022 

message: Hello, Wikipedia. I want to correct some facts in this article, that are not true. That's why i request for an Edit allowance Mr3xc (talk) 17:58, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You have misunderstood article protection. You will get autoconfirmed rights after 4 days on your account if you have made at least 10 edits. This will allow you to edit semi-protected articles such as this one. In the meantime, please describe the errors you have seen in the article so that another user can correct them. small jars tc 23:03, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Lemonaka (talk) 10:37, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 February 2023
Talk:Nylon

message: An unanswered question from 1970. One day in 1970 I noticed that strange gloss on the outside of a thin darkblue Nylon jacket my mother bought for me when I was age 6. Up to this day (2019) there seems to be no answer to that question. How do they do that? (the gloss on one side of thin Nylon fabric, no gloss on the other side). DannyJ.Caes (talk) 15:19, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gloss on one side of thin Nylon fabric, how do they do that? 

message: The section Nylon 510 was tagged a few days ago as not citing any sources. This is true, but there is another problem as well. Of 13 sentences, only the first is really about Nylon 510, and the third mentions PA 510 as one item in a list. The rest of the section is really a collection of miscellaneous points about other polyamides which should be moved elsewhere in the article. So some serious re-organization is needed here, especially for the material in this section. Dirac66 (talk) 01:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nylon 510 section not really about Nylon 510 

message: One could read the entire lead, and much of the article, before discovering that nylon is made from petroleum. There are innumerable sources for this; here's one. The word oil is mentioned first 2,300 words into the article (but not described as its manufacturing origin), crude oil 4,700 words in, and petroleum is mentioned not once in the entire article. Where nylon comes from, is one of the five-W questions to be answered by any encyclopedic or journalistic article about nylon, which means high up in the lead, probably in the WP:LEADSENTENCE, and prominently in the body of the article.  I don't plan to make changes to this article as I'm busy elsewhere, but hopefully some regulars  or others here will attend to this.  Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 22:11, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: The first sentence says "Nylon is a synthetic polymer", and the linked article on synthetic polymers starts off with "Synthetic polymers are derived from petroleum oil". Seems that none of our other articles on specific thermoplastics mention petroleum in the intro. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:06, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Thanks for pointing this out. In the linked article, I have now changed "derived from petroleum oil" to "often derived from petroleum oil", since there are many exceptions. Dirac66 (talk) 01:58, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Petroleum product 

message: His is a good person and he is a seicentist and he has a youtube channel and subscribe and support him
Thank you 160.238.75.58 (talk) 15:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yugandhar 

message: Easy naylon information
Please 2409:4041:2CB1:65D7:0:0:C849:6014 (talk) 06:10, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naylon
Talk:Public Force of Costa Rica

message: There certainly are expenditures on the National Guard, so there ought to be some expenditures figure for that.  When there is a border incident, such as that with Nicaragua in 1990, it's the National Guard who shows up -- my point being that it serves some functions of an army.  Presumably a figure should be given with an asterisk (as the expenditures for the national guards of other nations probably aren't included in these estimates).
The article title implies that CR has a military. I think it shoulkd be changed to something like Abolition of military in Costa Rica,  SqueakBox 15:23, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: expenditure figures

message: what are the military duties that it forms? In some countries border patrol is a police role, or at least performed by a nonmilitary organization. The COIN seems like a military unit to me, but I don't know much about it. Rds865 (talk) 05:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is the Guardia Civil an armed force? 

message: My first thought on reading this article was, 'surely Costa Rica can get away with this because of America?', but I see no mention of any treaties with America or other nations. Does Costa Rica really have no security agreements with anyone? --Gwern  (contribs) 16:17 19 September 2009 (GMT)
Hi there, someone previously edited the article to include this; however, they did not cite any sources. I looked up sources myself and found no such things. The United States provides EMET training, as shown in http://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R40593.pdf , but otherwise no, I can find no such agreements. 216.14.158.96 (talk) 21:51, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  International security 

message: I don't think the military portrayed in Jurassic Park III was intended to be Costa Rica's, as at the very end the helicopters are heading toward two aircraft carriers. --Snakespeaker (talk) 02:19, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, those were US Marines. Spartan198 (talk) 11:01, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In the book the Jurassic Park movies are based on it explicitly says "Costa Rican military". The author was also clueless enough to mistake the word "Tico" for Tican" Hobbitschuster (talk) 00:20, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: This is listed under grenade launchers in the weapons section. I Googled that name with no relevant results. What is it? Spartan198 (talk) 11:06, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's a Model 2012Z? 

message: The page has been redirected to a link that has yet to be made. The revision history has been erased. Google still seems to think that information is stored here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:F470:6:5002:2DB3:B1C9:4C5A:5234 (talk) 14:42, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing as of 9/30/2016
Talk:Max Ehrmann

message: Deleted "Remaining verses" from this page because they're now in the body of the article.
----
::Its from 1927-- may be fair use.-戴眩sv 01:31, 5 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Concepts "too sophisticated for the 17th century"?  Well, I'd prefer to say concepts alien to, or not particularly in tune with, the 17th century.  That is safe.  To say "too sophisticated" requires some backing up.  It also insinuates our own time is more sophisticated than the 17th century, a proposition that, to me at least, is not self evident.  Jm546 17:56, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too sophisticated? 

message: http://oldpoetry.com/oauthor/show/Max_Ehrmann is no longer valid. 91.125.92.104 (talk) 00:43, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken link

message: Dates of date and birth, transposed. 12.157.28.130 (talk) 21:39, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction 

message: The birthdates are correct, it is my failing eyesight at issue. Disregard. 12.157.28.130 (talk) 21:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mea Culpa
Talk:Chamarajanagar district

message: If anyone from Chamarajanagar district is out there...I want to write about the BR Hills, the Soliga, and Kollegal mostly.  I started on the whole district because that must be done first.  Please and pretty please add in information as you have it.  The Wikipedia is about cooperative addition to form a free body of knowledge.
- Bryan (Martalli)
Two quibblles with this article.  I was just in Martalli, near Nal Road in the old Kollegal taluk.  This article implies that the Hannur taluk is in existence, but according to my brother-in-law, who is in the Martalli panchayat, the Hannur taluk is not yet functioning.  Martalli panchayat still works with the Kollegal taluk.
Martalli 13:57, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled