Talk:Dogme 95

message: Key & Peele is a sketch comedy show on Comedy Central and YouTube. There is a sketch about guys talking in a cinema where they compare the film playing to "Dogme" in reference to handheld shots, scolding the film's director (presumably not even attempting a Dogme film) for not also following the rule that temporal and geographic alienation are forbidden (the alienation is not specified).
Key & Peele - Movie Hecklers (YouTube)
Seems to me it's relevant enough for the "Use of Concept" section, if only because they chose one of the less stereotyped rules (temporal and geographic alienation) to work into the joke. 
Here's a transcription of the relevant dialog:
1: This movie's got an inconsistent visual language!
2: Half the time this mother****** is just shooting all handheld like he a Dogme filmmaker. That's funny, since Dogme clearly forbids temporal or geographical alienation!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremyclarke (talk • contribs) 02:37, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Key & Peele mention Dogme 95 in sketch

message: I removed the following material from the article. It smacks of original research, and contains many weasel words and phrases like "it is speculated..." and "among filmmakers and true filmgoers..." that I would consider unacceptable for an encyclopedia article.  But if somebody want to dig up sources for this, it would be cool to put some of it back in, as there's valuable context there. --Misterwindupbird 00:17, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  clipped from article 

message: The reference to "Ladma," a group which was claimed to have inspired Dogme, is obviously patent nonsense and self-promotion.  Please delete on sight any references inserted in the future. (131.111.243.37 00:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ladma" 

message: The "List of Dogme Films" sections comes across a bit crufty, not to mention it is simply an out-of-date version of the list on the dogme95 web site.  What would people think of making it "Well-Known Dogme Films", and listing the films that have wikipedia articles or are otherwise notable? --142.103.211.144 22:11, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  list of dogme films 

message: I'm going to be working on fleshing out this article and altering some sections. I just started, and don't have the primary resources with me for the time being, but will be citing them shortly. I just felt that this article was lacking in a lot of areas and could use some work done on it. The sources I intend to use mostly consist of interviews with the directors themselves (as found in The Name of this Book is Dogme 95). Also, it may become glaringly obvious that I am not Danish and I would welcome any input from Danish contributors as I think the international experience with dogme is markedly different than the danish one. Goingtoalaska 20:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Maintenance/Improvements 

message: :Image:King is alive.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 09:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:King is alive.jpg

message: Although the film added by the last user was extant on the Dogme 95 site, it is incredibly likely that it is simply a false movie that had been added on there, as it had various 4chan content, along with a false address. In line with the previous films used as a demonstration which did have valid addresses and film-makers mentioned, I removed it. J O  R D A N [talk ] 15:23, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent removal of "mudkipz" related film 

message: I added a note on the origin of this unfamilar term (Danish for dogma).
See http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogme95 , http://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogme , http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dogma .
If anybody has a great cite for this definition, please add it. -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 22:06, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of term

message: from an unknown guy, who cares? are so important ? remove, is an encyclopedia, not a gossip paper.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.174.3.78 (talk) 22:38, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. But the article needs a section about the reception from producers, critics and the public. Sjö (talk) 06:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

text: Lol, Armond White is a three time chair of the New York Film Critics Circle, not an "unknown guy". Return. 188.127.101.248 (talk) 17:56, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The criticism ... 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:53, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: The fifth paragraph under History (about Juan Pinzás, the departure of the founders, and the end of Dogme 95) reads oddly and lacks context or, rather, the context is lower in the article. 
"Since 2002 and the 31st film, Spanish director Juan Pinzás is no longer needs to have their work verified by the original board to identify it as a Dogme 95 work after finishing up his own trilogy. The founding "brothers" have begun working on new experimental projects and have been skeptical about the later common interpretation of the Manifesto as a brand or a genre. The movement broke up in 2005." 2601:246:5C00:6070:A146:2DF2:82F6:EB81 (talk) 14:25, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History