lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Downtown Seattle Transit Tunnel

message: :Light rail tracks were installed in anticipation of future rapid transit service through the tunnel, which was later found to be poorly insulated and unusable for Link light rail
Can someone confirm? I'm not sure this is true. I know that the tunnel had a two-pole catenary, for the dual-mode buses, which was replaced with a one-pole catenary because the chosen Link trains weren't compatible with the former (and the dual-mode buses were replaced with "hush mode" diesel hybrids to keep the emissions down). But AFAIK tracks weren't laid in the tunnel until preparation for Link. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ 05:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This is already confirmed in the article, with a source cited. The excerpt you took is from the lead section, where citations are not required as long the information is repeated later (as everything in the lead is supposed to be) and cites sources there. This detail is covered in the section "Renovation for light rail". You can also find photos in the articles about individual stations, showing the tracks clearly in place in the 1990s, such as this one and this one. SJ Morg (talk) 07:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsuitable tracks 

message: The tunnel no longer allows bus use, so there should only be one blue route and the highway access point eliminated. - 73.169.248.107 (talk) 10:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram is out of date
Talk:Remi Schrijnen

message: Smurf-German: How can that be, if the Smurfs were only published in 1958? --moyogo 09:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. Bothered me too. He was called "Strumpf-Deutscher". I will have to check this, perhaps the French word "schtroumpf" already meant something at the time. But the sources do mention his shortness at the same time. Did "strumpf"-"schtroumpf" mean "second class"? While I check for an explanation, I will change into the German version, to make sure we are not talking rubbish here.--Pan Gerwazy 12:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Strumpf-Deutscher makes more sense than Schlümpfe-Deutscher indeed. --moyogo 16:09, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smurf-German 

message: As a Dutchman I am not content with this text. The SS-volunteers were no "heroes". Several parts of this article are not neutral. Robert Prummel (talk) 23:21, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nazi-propaganda on Wikipedia?
Talk:Ivan Vladislavic

message: I just checked the "South African novelists" page, and Ivan Vladislavic is listed there under "I" instead of under "V". I don't know how to fix this :(
This has been rectified (not by me). giles 14:27, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category problems 
Talk:Quakers Hill railway station

message: I'm sorry the picture I've added is so dark. It was late in the day when I took it. I'll try and get a better one during the middle of the day. --DavidMarsh (talk) 00:32, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Wilton's Music Hall

message: The following sentences in the 1990's Rebirth section do not seem to make much sense as a single sentence cites being in two different years. Based on https://www.wiltons.org.uk/heritage/history, in 1997 productions resumed but 1994 is not referenced. The site's history does not mention 1994 and my quick Google didn't find anything to help.  
Per the site's History page "The Wilton’s Music Hall Trust was formed under the direction of former Artistic Director, Frances Mayhew, in late 2004, to fully open the building to the public, secure the ownership of the building and present a wider arts programme."
I suspect this section is a bad rewrite of the history from the Wilton's website. But hopefully someone with more insight can fix it.
--JoelSherrill (talk) 14:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1990's Rebirth Unclear Sentences 

message: If you add the citations, I'll happily format them.  Remember, the cites need to come from a reliable source. Cassiantotalk 11:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations  

message: Two very positive reviews have been published on British newspaper sites recently.
Thought they might be helpful as additional references for the article:
* The Telegraph: How Wilton's Music Hall was brought back to life
* The Guardian: Wilton's Music Hall: derelict pleasure palace gets a ramshackle restoration
Regardless, they are well worth a read! -- EdJogg (talk) 08:47, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Couple of reliable sources...
Talk:Flint

message: Please. I just want it :3 2601:703:4280:69E0:317A:3499:7DAB:C98F (talk) 02:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transparent Backgrounds 
Talk:Gandhi Peace Prize

message: Please either make this clear or remove the highlighting. 81.159.58.45 (talk) 01:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is John Hume's award highlighted in the table? 

message: What did they win it for? Wasnt there a reason give?Lihaas (talk) 17:53, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: I noticed that no winners were listed since 2005, so I've been trying, without success, to update the page. (Perhaps the government simply hasn't named anyone since then?) I'm very surprised that there's no official government webpage for the award, listing all of the winners and providing the citations. Does anyone have access to the archives for the Indian newspapers? Have any of them posted articles when someone has won this award? Dewey Finn (talk) 23:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See the remarks above. From time to time I take a look to see if I can find anything, but without success so far. It might be worth asking at WP:WikiProject India to check whether there is any info in Hindi, or some other non-English language used in the subcontinent. --NSH001 (talk) 01:10, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No winners since 2005? 

message: Why is a "peace" prize given for "leadership" ? I found a link to this page on  Leadership Awards Red Pen (talk) 16:18, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  On Leadership 

message: Where are the award winners for years 2006-2012? Red Pen (talk) 16:20, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Awadees for intermediate years

message: nnjnjnnj! Jbbjjbbbbjnbjbbjbbnjuwwobsjsjhdkabxoskiwhridndhdjdbddmdhdjdidbhdhddbdd ku benin d bm djdhhdndndhdnndndnnnndnndnd  fnd  d d d dndndhhejejejJhn 202.91.88.138 (talk) 16:08, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maths
Category talk:Congressional scandals

message: Where is Representative Walter Tucker III?  IIRC, he ran pretty much unopposed (i.e., no Republican or Libertarian) for re-election to the House in 1994 when I lived in 37th district, even though he was on trial for extortion and corruption (he was ultimately convicted).  It was the only time I ever voted for a Peace and Freedom candidate.RandallC 09:36, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why are persons included in this category? You cannot say of a person that he or she is a scandal. LarRan (talk) 14:11, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: * I agree. Individuals should not be categorized as scandals. If there is an article on the specific scandal it should be linked within the article and the scandal article should be in the category. Otto4711 (talk) 12:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persons cannot be scandals
Talk:London Convention (1884)

message: Following from discussion on 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Xdamr#Pretoria_and_London_Conventions
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Paul_Hjul#Pretoria.2FLondon_Conventions
While I can see your position for retention of the two articles as seperate articles (we've discussed this on our talk pages) for now it seems best to me at least for the merge tag to be left - the orphaned tag can go - because we are constructing some stuff on it.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Hjul (talk • contribs) 
:Sorry, I didn't intend to remove the merge tag, only to undo the merge by User:Marcsin - a move which in my view was rather precipitate.  I'll try to expand the two pages Pretoria and London Conventions over the next couple of days, then we can decide their future.
:Xdamrtalk 14:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought as much. Thanks. On that point I've fixed the link from the Pretoria Convention
Paul Hjul 08:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge issue

message: The idea that British suzerainty was relinquished seems to be contradicted by 
Article I paragraph 4: The South African Republic will conclude no treaty or engagement with any state or nation other than The OFS … until the same is approved by HM the Queen.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.27.172.154 (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suzerainty
Talk:Bagri language

message: If you are a native speaker of Bagri then you can help translate this template into your own language:
 Edit
--Amazonien (talk) 05:09, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bagri language template

message: Respected sirs,Bagri and Bawri are totally seperate and unique language.Redirect made to Bawri language as Bagri language is totally wrong.Once user pointed out Bawri language is not recognised by govt. of India.It does not make sense since india is nation of many major and minor languages.Bawri language is also one of those minor language.The speakers of this language are mostly marginalised in terms of education etc.so i request to respected wikipedian let me allow to write article as BAWRI LANGUAGE and put light on this hidden language.it is totally different with Bagri in terms of vocabulary and grammar.It is spoken by Sikhs where as Bagri is spoken by HINDUS. Shemaroo (talk) 12:36, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Please go ahead and create a separate article on Bawri. Include the references. Thanks. 222.165.9.81 (talk) 20:24, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Bagri vs Bawri Language
Talk:Kokborok drama

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition
Talk:Kokborok grammar

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:49, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition 

message: Please sir 2409:4066:97:C8B2:CCB0:41D2:658F:F96A (talk) 01:44, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kokborok
Talk:Kokborok tei Hukumu Mission

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:50, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition 

message: I have deleted 8 revisions that were made between March 13, 2008 and December 15, 2008 from the article's history, as they reproduced the text from this site (note the "Copyright - all rights reserved" at the bottom of the home page). Please feel free to refer to the site for information, but the article must be written independently. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:02, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: The article you created, Kokborok tei Hukumu Mission is about to be deleted from Wikipedia. 
There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kokborok tei Hukumu Mission.  The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important. 
There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
 
1. You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron.  If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page. 
2. You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User.  But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
3. When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms.  Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. travb (talk) 01:12, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Your hard work is about to be deleted from Wikipedia
Talk:Koottu

message: The typical pronunciation in Tamil is kUttu (கூட்டு) with a long 'U' and double 't' sound. The current spelling creates an impression of கூடு. I suggest renaming the topic (rams81 (talk) 16:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kootu or Koottu? 
Talk:Ashley Litton

message: This subject does not seem to be the subject of "multiple, non-trivial published works" per WP:BIO (one short bio page on a pageant competition), nor to meet any of the other criteria under it. Ghits are negligible. Are there any other sources that mention her with more then a one-liner or short bio? Seraphimblade 10:14, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as I have just added.  -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 10:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed the tag, looks like she got quite a bit of press. Seraphimblade 10:29, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability concern
Talk:Mewati language

message: Hi  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.255.40.89 (talk) 05:04, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

message: The "Voiced vs. Voiceless" and "Aspirated vs. Unaspirated" sections are obviously inadequately contextualized pieces of somebody's research paper picked up and dropped bodily here. (If the wording weren't enough, the reference to Table II, which doesn't exist here, would prove it.)
Also, WHAT is the point of the previous section on this talk page? Is s/he the author of this Wiki article, or what?
GeorgeTSLC (talk) 18:17, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: SOMEbody's paper

message: Why redirected Ahirwati and Mewati are different language and different regions?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.119.104.226 (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why redirected Ahirwati and Mewati are different language and different regions?
Talk:Mewati gharana

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 07:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Tripura Janasiksha Samiti

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:55, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition
Talk:Tripuri people

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition 

message: The article Mosodeng is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mosodeng until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion.  However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[Mosodeng]] for deletion 

message: Its been a while I noticed everytime that About Tiprasa people its been always a Step Back ... The Population of Tiprasa is about 9 lakhs in 2001 census but In 2011 Population of Tiprasa reached nearly approx 1.3 million atleast in Tripura and Tiprasa people are of Kachari Origin and are Mongoloid peoples Archer Debbarma (talk) 10:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  True ! Al-minar (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tripura and Tripuri (Tiprasa)  

message: This article contains original research as there is no reference to most of it's concocted information. Please cite additional references to make the article acceptable. Thanks Al-minar (talk) 15:32, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refrences 

message: Please delete the last paragraph under religion. It is not relevant here and it is definitely a misrepresentation of the community done with bad intention. There are no known incidents of religious friction among the Tripuris. Zbdb (talk) 12:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion
Talk:Tripuri dress

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition 
Talk:Tripuri games and sports

message: Note:  Project Banner with Tripura workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Tripura or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 10:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Tripura Addition
Talk:Ritarihuone

message: The official English name of Ritarihuone is The Finnish House of Nobility. Teuton 10:45, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

message: The official English name should be used here instead of the Finnish name. Thus, Finnish House of Nobility
/Teuton 12:04, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finnish House of Nobility
Talk:House of Nobility (Finland)

message: The official English name should be used here instead of the Finnish name. Thus Finnish House of Nobility
/Teuton 12:02, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Teuton 19:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Proviso: The only argument for "House of Knights" would be if it was historically so called by anglo-saxons pre-1900 (not my area of expertise). -- Abut 17:13, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was to move to Finnish House of Nobility. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 20:31, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ritarihuone 
Talk:Blue straggler

message: Maybe here is a better image recently released, it more clearly shows the blue color of the stars than the current image:
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/384605main_ero_omega_centauri_full_full.jpg
Should the image in the article be replaced?
Tinwelint (talk) 06:10, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a new image, though not the one you suggested. If you could give me some more information about the image you suggested, I could add that too, but I did not know all of the details. James McBride (talk) 01:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New image?

message: The German language page for this topic contains a gross error, namely that blue stragglers have more than 50 solar masses.
The reason I am posting here is that my login doesn't work on the German side. Vegasprof 10:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: German article error
Talk:Obstruent

message: An example would be helpful. --Delirium 09:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure would.  Bubba73 (talk), 06:31, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed.  I think the t in cat or the p in sap could be considered obstruents, at least pronounced the way most American-English speakers would pronounce it.  Framed0000 (talk) 20:31, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I should be more specific--the t in cat and the p in sap might be considered obstruents when speakers are speaking quickly. Framed0000 (talk) 19:46, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Liane Cartman

message: It'a actually written "scheiße" and not "shiße" like in the article.--84.146.249.166 19:46, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: Wouldn't it make sense for Ms. Cartman to be bisexual? I mean, she has had sex with both men and women... - 155.143.198.130 10:27, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sexuality

message: I think that this article really is redundant. In the first place, there is no real-world information on the character; in the second place, the article is of a length not much longer that Kyle Schwartz, Shelley Marsh, and Marvin Marsh's articles were (it just has more sections). I think the whole article could easily be covered in List of South Park families. Wilhelmina Will (talk) 07:11, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the merge proposal. I re-added the tag and perform the merger within a week if no one objects. --LoЯd ۞pεth 02:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I see she gets her own article while Mr. Hankey has to share an article on another page. Make up your mind Wikipedians!. --Mjbauer95 (talk) 04:55, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Own Article
Talk:Obese Records

message: The year Obese Records was founded in is listed as 1995, but the founder is the purchaser from 2002. I get that it changed operations in 2002, but does that change the founder? If so, doesn't it change the year founded? 131.217.6.8 (talk) 07:15, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  ok I see what you mean. I'll change year to 2002 since the 1995 date refers to a record store with a different name (OBs). the label came later Kathodonnell (talk) 10:27, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founder/Founded in Info box 

message: I added the quote by Mark Pollard (stealth) about Obese & Hilltop Hoods, because HH are the most (commercially) well-known & successful Australian hip hop band and Obese played a major role in them coming to this state, so I thought it might help with notability. Kathodonnell (talk) 23:43, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  quote about Obese & Hilltop Hoods 

message: The article currently states that Obese Records stopped releasing music in 2016. What about the other arms of the business? Are any of them still active? --Danimations (talk) 13:05, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did all Obese Records activities wind up in 2016?