lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ayelish McGarvey

message: You made a fair proposal for deletion when this article had no sources. I added two sources, and now I think this article meets minimal requirements for WP:GNG. I have no objection if you wish to nominate this for WP:AFD. Thanks for patrolling because typically articles such as this merit deletion.  Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:58, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks for improving the article. The category of unreferenced BLPs is a sad place, sigh. Elli (talk | contribs) 00:00, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Talk:Bob Fioretti

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Move; treated as uncontroversial. (non-admin closure)  microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 17:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Robert Fioretti →  – Per WP:CommonName. I have been considering this for a LONG TIME. Fioretti's common name, in my opinion, is "Bob" not "Robert". If you look at news coverage of his most recent campaign, for instance,  most media refer to him as "Bob" not "Robert". It's been this case for years. Additionally, his campaign website and materials do the same. As did previous campaigns. As does his Ballotpedia page. His public Twitter and Facebook accounts also use "Bob". Even the name of his campaign committee uses "Bob". SecretName101 (talk) 03:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 March 2024
Talk:List of Chicago Bulls seasons

message: Isn't it redundant to have both symbols and colors to represent division champsions, conference champions, etc.?
Sloclops (talk) 16:02, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it is a FLC requirement.—Chris! ct 03:31, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Huh, so two indicators that represent the same thing makes it not redundant?  I checked the FLC and it didn't say that it had to have colors and symbols to mark the champions.  If anything it makes the list look overworked and cluttered. Sloclops (talk) 15:13, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, not exactly an official FLC requirement, but it is widely regarded as one per WP:ACCESS. Try ask someone on the talk page of FLC. I am sure people will explain more to you.—Chris! ct 00:58, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Symbols
Talk:Cuddly Dudley

message: I have no strong opinions on attempts to delete this page pro or con, but it should be noted that the subject is misspelled. The correct name is Cuddly Dudley, which currently redirects to the article Ray Rayner. Proof of this, as long as it lasts, are pictures of the original box in the completed sale eBay listing at http://cgi.ebay.com/CUDDLY-DUDLEY-FROM-THE-RAY-RAYNER-SHOW-VERY-NICE_W0QQitemZ120159526582QQihZ002QQcategoryZ31QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
where one of the box pictures clearly shows the caption HOW TO MAKE A HOUSE FOR CUDDLY DUDLEY. Michael Devore 22:06, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Misspelled name
Talk:Colorado Catholic Academy

message: If "CCA closed due to financial constraints after the conclusion of the 06/07 school year", is it still notable? Chris 08:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: closing?
Talk:David Haugh

message: The "source" for anti-Notre Dame "bias" is not credible, and it does not support the sentence that I have removed.  This "source" is a single opinion column written by an apologist for Notre Dame who criticized and smeared Haugh for his criticism of Notre Dame's conduct in its recent handling of an allegation of sexual assault against a Notre Dame football player and subsequent suicide by the alleged victim.  To support the sentence as written, the contributor would need to provide multiple credible sources. Jrgilb (talk) 05:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Freddie Wilcox

message: To the anon editor who recently added biographical details to this article - 
Thank you for taking the trouble to improve this article. Not in any way doubting your work, but do you think you could you provide a verifiable source for your additions? Apart from Wikipedia expecting its contributions to be referenced to reliable sources, I'd like to know for my own satisfaction, as the sources I used for the original biog stuff aren't usually that wrong. Thanks, Struway2 | Talk 08:39, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent additions to this article
Talk:Gragareth

message: I've removed a reference to the nearby Green Hill being taller, as there seems to be no evidence for it - in fact, there's evidence against it.
An amateur website claims Green Hill as the county top, at a height of 628 m tall, but no reputable supporting evidence is offered, and the Ordnance Survey confirms otherwise (see the 1:25,000 map; I don't seem to be able to link to it myself - sorry), stating the true height as 626 m asl.
Ministry (talk) 18:49, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: OS maps clearly show that Gragareth is 627m AOD , whereas Green Hill is 628m AOD . (You may need to zoom out one level on the maps on the Streetmap site to see the 1:25k OS mapping.) OS is of course an authoritative, relable source. Bazonka (talk) 19:36, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Green Hill?
Talk:New Epoch Notation Painting

message: I have no idea what this article is about and I have degrees in Philosophy and Art History. I understand the concept of notation and am familiar with Kandinsky...but it doesn't seem to help me here! I also see many sources in the citation section indicating that something *can* be said about the subject in a non-obscure way. The article is incoherent and assumes that the reader already has some knowledge of the subject, which, it must be said, is also obscure. Saudade7 08:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?

message: The article should point out why this notation claims to be the first of its kind. How does it differ from Bezier curves, for example? How does it differ from general movement notations (e.g. Labanotation)? Burschik (talk) 15:22, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify claims
Talk:Shun dynasty

message: There's a move request to decapitalize "dynasty" in the Chinese dynasty articles, as in Han Dynasty → Han dynasty. For more information and to give your input, see . --Cold Season (talk) 18:28, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move request to decapitalize all Chinese dynasty articles 

message: A dynasty is a succession of rulers from the same family.  There's only 1 person here, so not a dynasty.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.161.124.230 (talk) 05:56, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The term "dynasty" may be used to delimit the era too. The Xin dynasty also had only one emperor, but it was still a dynasty. --Cartakes (talk) 10:52, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this a dynasty?
Talk:Munbae-ju

message: Are there no hanja for "munbae"? Badagnani 19:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't believe there is -- 배(bae) is not Sino-derived; the Hanja for pear is 이 (ii) or 리 (li) (梨) Konamaiki 01:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Some non-Sinitic, indigenous Korean terms have been subject to hanjaization. Kimchi apparently derives from the obsolete hanja 沈菜.
Why do you want to use those hanja you are guessing about (meaning "Korean pear liquor")? Do you need to make a zh:WP article? Badagnani 06:02, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

text: No i don't mean to make the article of zh:WP. I'm only guessing. I'm not the expert of hanja/hangeul fields.
--back to goguryeo 06:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hanja 

message: Can a Korean speaker check the website we've linked here: Moonbaesool official site and evaluate it? Why is the name "Moonbaesool" and not "Munbaeju"? Is this the same liquor? Badagnani 06:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sul or sool (술) and ju (주 酒) has the same meaning but the former is purely Korean language. 
The Revised Romanization is just a tool for Koreans to tranliterate their language to other written systems. People who has their surname '문' always spell their name as "Moon", not "Mun", because 'u' is sometimes pronounced 'eo' and Koreans think 'u' is not looking good.  Spelling 'moon' also reminds of 'moon' (a planet) and the difference between "Moonbaeju" and "Moonbaesool" is repetition of 'oo'. Non-English speaker like Koreans might think why 'hot dog' is not spelled as "hat dog" or apple as 'aepl. In summary, the site surely introduces 'munbaeju'. --Appletrees 12:40, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Website needs to be evaluated
Talk:Mauli Dave

message: Malav1988 08:20, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Hello , Isn't it incorrect to refer this site  for BLP?  
I saw a lot of articles refer IMDb which according to policy is inappropriate to link to for BLP. What do you think of Asha Parekh article? I saw only IMBd is supporting her birth place and date. Should remove it or put a Citation tag in the empty space? 
EDIT:This youtube video mentions her birth date in description and is a verified channel 
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , I wouldn't use Filmibeat for that. Generally speaking we don't consider them a reliable source for controversial data. IMDb should not be used as well. Not sure what you're asking me about :Asha Parekh. Her DOB looks unsourced to me, so we should either find a quality source for the birth date or remove it. Re: the youtube link, I wouldn't treat the video description as authoritative. For all we know they copied the information from Wikipedia. If the video itself discusses her birth date, then perhaps. "Verified" only really helps us determine whether or not the video is a potential copyright violation. In some cases it can help establish authority, like if were the Bollywood Hungama channel or (in this case) some major Gujarati news outlet. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:13, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: , Yeah I was talking about Asha Parekh's DOB and Birth Place. I got this  which makes her DOB of 2 Oct 1942 seem legit. What do you say?Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looks fine to me. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:50, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks man. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:55, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Always happy to help, and I appreciate editors who ask questions when they don't know things. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:12, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regarding her Birthplace and Birth Date
Talk:Affective spectrum

message: In my view the title of this article is incorrect.
1.  The article concerns only affective disorders whilst there is clearly a concept of "affective development" which is entirely positive. (e.g. see: Cognitive and affective development in adolescence, Laurence Steinberg, Department of Psychology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA)
2.  Contrary to the title the article doesn't describe a spectrum or continuum of any kind.  It is simply a list of affective disorders.
I suggest renaming the article: "Affective disorders"
LookingGlass 08:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the title is most unfortunate. This article is listing purportedly common comorbidities of mood disorders. Alas, common comorbidities vary by diagnosis. Major depressive disorder, dysthymic disorder, cyclothymic disorder, Bipolar II disorder, and Bipolar I disorder all have their own common comorbidities. I've usually heard the affective, or bipolar, spectrum concept invoked to describe a continuum of severity of depressive and/or manic symptoms. Some people could have subclinical symptoms of depression, hypomania, or both; mood episodes may also be mixed with unipolar depression occupying one end and unipolar mania occupying the other.--NeantHumain (talk) 00:45, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

text: I, ten years later, also agree. Redo or redirect.Pannmoja (talk) 12:11, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate/incorrect title
Talk:Middle Head Fortifications

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 15:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Killurin, County Wexford

message: Moved to talk.  Is this significant to be in the article? RJFJR (talk) 16:23, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sports
Talk:Sonya Golden Hand

message: The article should be checked by a native English speaker. 188.25.163.111 (talk) 19:27, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  english 
Talk:Phoenix Finance

message: Im not sure if this is of any relevance but, if you type in on google (images) AP05 you can see some images of the livery and a prototype.  Should we include them in this page because im not sure if they ar relevant to the article.
Pattav2 (talk) 07:08, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Those images appear to be renders created by someone on the internet, I don't believe they are official Prost renders.  They don't belong here not only because they not relevant, but also because they're copyrighted. The359 (talk) 08:43, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  AP05 

message: The lead states they attempted to enter the 2003 season as well, yet there is nothing on the 2003 attempt in the body of the article. So what's the deal with the 2003 entry. Tvx1 19:12, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2003
Talk:Spangles Muldoon

message: There's no redirect from Chris Cary to Spangles Muldoon. It should be!
Rob  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.45.90.147 (talk) 22:47, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Anyone else here because of today's Grauniad? Totnesmartin (talk) 11:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect missing 

message: you have printed a story re Chris Cary Radio Nova Ireland He was married only twice first wife Kate Cary and had daughter Louise Second Wife Remy Cary had two children Alex and Kristie Cary He was never married to Sybil Fennell. He has 3 sons NOT 2. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.7.69.164 (talk) 16:20, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved this comment to here as it appears to be the place intended. Johnuniq (talk) 01:01, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment moved from [[WT:Citing sources]] 

message: Lots of sweeping assertions and peacock wording here; not a lot of solid references. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:48, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional tone
Talk:Great Wall Haval H3

message: After a quick look on the GWM global website, I believe that the Hover's name has been changed to Haval. Is this true? Any thoughts? --Pineapple Fez 09:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hover > Haval???

message: The Haval H5 and Haval H3 are SAME CAR! H5 it is only a facelift (different front grille)! No other difference  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.160.61.182 (talk) 10:40, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of Haval H5
Talk:Stas Namin

message: The article is fan-written with advertising style and no references. A very bad article.Garret Beaumain (talk) 04:49, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Stéphane Paquette

message: Had the honor and pleasure of meeting and being entertained by the one and only, Stephane Paquette. This gentleman has travelled the world and has been in places many of us only dream of, yet he remains a humble man. Picture a moonlit night, lakeside, by the campfire. Picture about 20 or so family and friends that have gathered around. Have a seat, have a drink and singing along with Steph. Flawless guitar playing, good laughs and great stories...best of all were songs of days gone by; the ones that make you smile; ones that bring back good memories. He is quite the show man. This is the stuff legends are made of my friends.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.227.139.51 (talk) 01:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: comment
Talk:Cramming (education)

message: this new article is really great work by xDanielx.  I don't think there's any reason to include the word "mugging."  (I am referring to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mugging (mugging for exam)). OfficeGirl 10:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Feel free to delete the "mugging" mention if it's not sufficiently notable -- I'm not familiar with the word so I don't feel prepared to make the judgment. — xDanielx T/C 01:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  no "mugging" 

message: This suggestion is a bit ironic since I (hesitantly) named the article in the first place, but I'm having second thoughts about the title. I think one could argue that not all cramming consists of memorization, but other forms of learning as well. What do others think about renaming to Cramming (academics)? — xDanielx T/C 03:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Random note: If others support the name change, I think we should wait until the mugging AfD is over to prevent confusion, I just thought I'd bring it up now. — xDanielx T/C 04:01, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe the term would apply to any kind of time when quick last-minute memorization is needed and not just for school, e.g. preparing for a certification test, preparing for an interview, etc.  It seems to be specific to tests.  I don't think you would describe memorizing acting lines for a play, or legal points for a court appearance, to be cramming.  But perhaps.  It's pretty clear that the term "mugging" is used extensively in Asia.  Wikidemo 05:21, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, you have a point. How does Cramming (studying) sound? — xDanielx T/C 07:29, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: Removed broken hyperlinks / references to "Kyleface"
207.255.102.180 (talk) 15:37, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Edits 
Talk:Stefania Wolicka

message: Which sources give her date of birth, and which state she was from Posen (Poznań)? I cannot find a source for the first, and the second contradicts the more popular version I see about her being from Warsaw. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 02:44, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Birth date is here: http://www.matrikel.uzh.ch/active/27469.htm . It looks like this ref might have been removed in a recent revision. Pburka (talk) 03:08, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarifications 

message: Thanks to Piotrus for nominating this article for a Did you Know! Pburka (talk) 01:11, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  DYK 

message: The link of Trial of Fifty leads to a wrong trial of that name, a Portuguese one of the 20th century.--Morel (talk) 22:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trial of Fifty 

message: She graduated in Zurich in 1867!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beat22 (talk • contribs) 16:56, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nadezhda Suslova (1843-1918)
Talk:Steina and Woody Vasulka

message: How do you collaborate with someone AFTER they died (posthumously)? Do you mean they sampled his work? Editrite! (talk) 21:15, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harald Bode
Talk:Warrant card

message: Why is this article in :Category:New South Wales Police Force ? Peet Ern (talk) 02:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They also have warrant cards, though is not mentioned here. Ozdaren (talk) 12:49, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorisation - NSWPF ? 

message: The article claims that MI5 carry Warrant Cards. I have never heard of this. I am surprised because it would mean that MI5 was described and covered by UK laws covering Law Enforcement. The source is given as the book 'Spycatcher' which, as far as I know, covers a period a long time ago.178.15.145.204 (talk) 11:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  MI5 have Warrant Cards
Talk:Collar number

message: Anyone want to add something on this? Turkeyphant 01:33, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: May I point out that "pigs" is not a very constructive edit summary for this entry. Indeed it is somewhat juvenile. -- Necrothesp (talk) 20:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is it a problem worth mentioning or do you actually have something to add regarding the content of the article? Turkeyphant 23:47, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since this is a discussion page I believe I can mention what I like. As an administrator I would warn you against the use of such edit summaries. "Coppers" is not insulting, "pigs" is! -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Who is "pigs" insulting to?  Who do you think it was addressed at? Turkeyphant 10:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Covering numbers at protests, etc.

message: MR is listed as the obsolete code for Rotherhithe police station, which closed in 2017.
Yet officers on the street are once again wearing MR collar numbers, does anyone know what it now represents?
e.g. https://www.instagram.com/p/CzPO00hMayZ/ (5th image)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GFcWD3HXQAAKCWD?format=png&name=900x900
Wnjr (talk) 15:49, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Have old station codes returned to the Met?
Talk:Rodimus

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Optimus Prime (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 14:00, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Optimus Prime which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RFC bot 12:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Change his name to Hot Rod.It makes more sense to use Hot Rod as that how he identified.Rodimus and the  other variation are  only used for his toys.Also can somebody use a picture/screenshot  of Hot Rod from the  1986 movie in his profile  not his toy.Also might as well combine with Rodimus Prime to  to show the different variant of the character.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.27.115.116 (talk) 07:51, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Hot Rod

message: 1. There are now too many non-free images on this page. This page used to have more images, but the image-police cracked down and we removed most of them. So adding more images is NOT helping. 
2. The Transformers template at the bottom of this page is done completely wrong. We have agreed in the Transformers wiki project to only add that box to articles linked to in the box. This is NOT one of them. It needs to be removed or revised. Either way you only add the Transformers tamplate link, not the whole text of the template! Mathewignash (talk) 19:12, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Basiclly don't use that arguement when the image police come in, or they will delete the images on this page AND on the Ratchet page. Sometimes we get one per character, but since this page is all about G1 Rodimus, we get one Picture. Most pages that get inspected are allowed only ONE non-free image. We were lucky to get two. Mathewignash (talk) 09:33, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with this page