Talk:Magyarization/archive 2

message: This anonymous edit without citation or summary changed the date at which Hungarian was introduced for civil records from 1836 to 1844. I'm noting it rather than reverting, because I simply don't know the facts, but does someone have a citation for either date? - Jmabel | Talk 05:21, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civil records 

message: If an article like this is allowed, there should be a similar one on Slovakization, since it is well proven that the ethnic balance of the Carpathian Basin was shifted considerably since the Trianon Treaty. Árpád 02:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Slovakization? Be bold and create it. :) —Khoikhoi 03:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Probably should exist. For what it's worth, we already have Romanianization, focused mainly on Transsylvania, so it's not like someone has it uniquely in for the Magyars. - Jmabel | Talk 00:33, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Árpád is an extremist chauvinist fascist Hungarian vandal (who is very probably all the time the same very primitive - openly - fascist vandal - HunTomy - who has appeared here before last Christmas), who is constantly changing his name (creating sockpuppets), provoking permanent unnecessary quarrels, placing irrelant fascist propaganda on talk pages and is highly stupid as a person. So much for the "good" faith. He should have been banned for ever 6 months ago. So do not discuss with him as if he was a normal contributor here. Juro 00:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Slovakization

message: Latinitas, please stop spaming this talk page and try to explain here relevance of your "examples" for the subject. I mean, what the hell they have to do with Magyarisation policy of the Hungarian state? Who care what some Ducso Csaba said somewhere? This should be seriuos article that speak about Magyarization state policy backed up with facts and statistics. I have very good sources about Magyarization through school system, election rights, etc, etc (backed up with large statistics data). However, my sources are in Serbian and I do not have time to translate them at this moment. I might do it in the future, but if you do not have to add serious facts about the subject, please refrain from spaming article with irrelevant data, ok? Thank you. PANONIAN (talk) 14:25, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bring them and prsent them. This article needs some examples. Anyway the contempary quotes are good. --Latinitas 14:58, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I will present them when I find free time for that (which I do not have now, because I first should again read entire book about this to find all relevant data). And please tell me who the hell is this Ducso Csaba? Should we include here what every drunk Hungarian ever yelled in the street? Come on, man, if we start to use Wikipedia to quote opinion of every street drunkard from this World, we would totally destroy Wikipedia project. If you have quotes what some relevant Hungarian official said (like president of the government or minister for education) that would be relevant, but opinion of some guy for whom nobody ever heard is certainly not relevant. PANONIAN (talk) 20:22, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, Latinitas, I expanded article a little. You see now what facts and statistics mean, not the quoted sentences of who-knows-who. :) PANONIAN (talk) 22:53, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Examples" of Magyarisation