Talk:Evolution and the Catholic Church

message: Quote from the article:
All Catholics must accept that God initiated and continued the process of his evolutionary creation, that Adam and Eve were real people (the Church also rejects "Polygenism," the idea that along with Adam and Eve there existed other humans from which modern humans are descended[3]),
End quote
Where is the evidence that the Catholic Church says "that Adam and Eve were real people". I've always thought the Catholic Church no longer supports Genesis creation. Have a look here: http://christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/6035/why-did-the-catholic-church-stop-supporting-genesis-creation
::Indeed. This bit has appeared relatively recently, sourced to a website, though the page has a 2004 imprimatur. The long and somewhat tortured passage in the official Catechism should be checked, but "that Adam and Eve were real people" is by no means the same as "Genesis creation". Johnbod (talk) 23:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Catholic church teaches theological Creationism, i.e. God did the Creation, but Science is the means by which we understand HOW He did it, not theology. I think from a Catholic perspective, the primary problem with this new 'Intelligent Design' movement is not that there was an intelligent design, but that these proponents insist that science can prove it, which the church takes no position on. I fail to see how a naturalistic process like the Scientific Method could possibly prove a miraculous event, as by definition it would remove it from being 'miraculous' in the strictest definition.  With the Big Bang science has proven the universe came into existence in a moment, but by using naturalistic methods and theories is it still a miracle?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.129.129.172 (talk) 15:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adam and Eve 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Evolution and the Catholic Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130323053842/http://www.mendel-museum.com/eng/1online/room1.htm to http://www.mendel-museum.com/eng/1online/room1.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090607000752/http://www.cinews.ie/article.php?artid=5793 to http://www.cinews.ie/article.php?artid=5793
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070804102139/http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2004/0401bt.asp to http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2004/0401bt.asp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/pius_xii/encyclicals/documents/hf_p-xii_enc_12081950_humani-generis_en.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Evolution and the Catholic Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060930072306/http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=21156 to http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=21156
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Evolution and the Catholic Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090221042514/http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/vaticanview.html to http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/vaticanview.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140202144951/http://www.hds.harvard.edu/news-events/harvard-divinity-bulletin/articles/darwins-pope to http://www.hds.harvard.edu/news-events/harvard-divinity-bulletin/articles/darwins-pope
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060816061101/http://www.beliefnet.com/story/197/story_19764_1.html to http://www.beliefnet.com/story/197/story_19764_1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927213823/http://ncrcafe.org/node/435 to http://ncrcafe.org/node/435
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I see that the link to John Paul II's 1986 speech is dead, and I cannot find a replacement, even on the Vatican website. Is it possibly related to this? Arbitrarily0 (talk) 02:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Paul II on evolution