Talk:Islam in Italy

message: I modified the introduction a little, adding the procedure that a religion needs to follow to be recognized as official. The whole paragraph was incomplete without it. I also removed a source that was given as a reference for the 8 per thousand regulations, but that was pretty insignificant in that position: http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1110/p07s01-woeu.html.  Personally I don't see it as a relevant one, but I put it in the talk section as possibly it was just misplaced and somebody would still like to use it somewhere else.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raggot (talk • contribs) 13:31, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Modification on recognition by the government

message: Edited: History section; a direct translation from the German version of this page. Jojo atze 18:52, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey thanks! I requested that translation aeons ago and had come to the conclusion that there were no editors both fluent in German and sufficiently interested in and knowledgable about the topic to want to do such a long translation. Splendid work, the article is improved out of recognition. —Ian Spackman 01:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old translation request (from the German Wikipedia)

message: I have listed this page for cleanup. I think there are several problems with the used of biased wording, weasel terms and irrelevant information. 
In the second paragraph, it is stated that "There is a perception among some that this constant wave of arrivals is placing the nation under siege, the foreign customs and practices of these people is alien to many who have lived their entire lives in an almost homogenous Italo-Catholic environment". No alternative perspective or critisism of this point of view is offered. Also, the use of the word "success" in intercepting immigrants might be regarded as a point-of-view statement.
The argumentative nature of the last paragraph is rather unencyclopedic. It seems like the author is trying to make a point, using some rather biased wording ("stirring", "a vocal few"). Again, no opposing perspective is offered. The very last sentence, "It is common in Muslim-majority countries to find arrow-signs in hotel rooms indicating the direction of Mecca and is not made an issue of by non-Muslims" has nothing to do with the subject of the article, unless the argument is attributed to a cited Italian source. / Alarm 12:00, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: A number of figures in this article has been changed. Could someone please provide a reference for the statistics given? / Alarm 19:07, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of statistics 

message: This article was previously listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Without online source. 
*Italian exports and Islam in Italy all smell like copyvios but I can't tell where from.  They were all put up by User:82.43.213.217, and share the same writing style. Dave6 05:44, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Without online source]] 

message: Muslims dont come from Algeria in Italy. I dont know who wrote that. I am going to ISTAT as a source instead!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.150.154.247 (talk) 21:51, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Muslim Sources

message: there is a need for a map showing the cities mentioned in the article clearly. --81.159.154.104 (talk) 16:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  map needed 

message: the last edit mentioned that 50,000 Muslims have Italian citizenship
This is most surely inaccurate (it's a gross underestimation, in my view). The person who inserted it should produce a reliable source for his data. In the meantime, it should stay out.
Giordaano (talk) 10:19, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: =number of Muslim citizens

message: the talk page is there for discussion. If you disagree with someone, discuss. ThanksGiordaano (talk) 12:27, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: please, don't edit the talk page

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Islam in Italy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120226141955/http://www.cittadinitalia.it/mininterno/export/sites/default/it/temi/religioni/sottotema002.html to http://www.cittadinitalia.it/mininterno/export/sites/default/it/temi/religioni/sottotema002.html
*Added  tag to http://83.137.212.42/siteArchive/catalystmagazine/Default.aspx.LocID-0hgnew0b7.RefLocID-0hg01b001006009.Lang-EN.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070206001148/http://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~mriexin/euroislam.html to http://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~mriexin/euroislam.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:51, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
* Moschea 00497.JPG
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:24, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion