lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Carbon dioxide equivalent

message: Should this be merged and redirected into GWP, since they are the same? William M. Connolley 20:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This entry seems to dictate a superficial notation difference between to concepts: CO2e as an equivalent concentration, and CDE as an equivalent emission rate. Problems:
1. CDE is not a recognized standard name or abbreviation
2. CDE is not a quantity but a rate (e.g., ton/year)
3. CO2e is commonly used for both concentrations and rates, depending on the context, and is simply a weighted number based on GWP in both cases.
4. as presented, this is more confusing than helpful to non-experts.
I would recommend:
1. incorporate this under GWP or at least reference GWP.
2. add a better introduction explaining the concept of weighting emissions or concentrations by GWP and why that would be done in simple terms.
3. add a section explaining the time-scale issue and describing the standard 100-year generaly used today.
4. keep the two sections w/o the 'CDE' term -- replace with CO2e
38.96.176.66 (talk)
:My suggestion is instead of having "carbon dioxide equivalent" and "equivalent carbon dioxide", have carbon dioxide equivalent emissions and carbon dioxide equivalent concentrations. Woood (talk) 09:33, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Its not a notational difference; they are two different concepts. I don't understand the assertion that the article is over complicated. Unless you can point to a simpler way of explaining the same difference? William M. Connolley (talk) 22:25, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

text: I agree with Woood above - this would follow the IPCC approach. I have not seen 'CDE' used elsewhere. Flit (talk) 22:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I also have not seen the abbreviation "CDE" in any literature or reference sources. According to the European Commission, "A carbon dioxide equivalent, or CO2 equivalent, abbreviated as CO2-eq is a metric measure used to compare the emissions from various greenhouse gases on the basis of their global-warming potential (GWP), by converting amounts of other gases to the equivalent amount of carbon dioxide with the same global warming potential." The link is: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Glossary:CO2_equivalentNellied3 (talk) 07:51, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overly complicted and confusing for non-experts 

message: In the section "Global warming potential", para 2 we see the use of an ambiguous noun billion with no clarification as to its actual value.  I have rewritten it using the British value 1x10^12.  I strenuously suggest that in any article using such counting nouns there must be a disclaimer indicating the actual value of the unit.  A very much better solution is to use the real value intended as an arithmetical quantity.  Counting nouns are for children, politicians and news-media hype, not for encyclopedic use.  58.7.166.200 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 13:13, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counting nouns
Talk:WRBS (AM)

message: While the text matches the article from the Baltimore newspaper, to the best of my knowledge the organization has always been known as ASCAP where the p stands for publishers.  ASCAP does not handle payments for musicians  - record labels do that.
What is striking about this station is that with the NAB locking out ASCAP trying to replace it with BMI, this newly licensed station sided with ASCAP. StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 00:43, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ASCAP
Talk:Dynamic assessment

message: This needs to come down asap. This is not the definition of Dynamic Assessment. Anyone in the educational psychology world would merely laugh at this. I suggest visiting www.dynamicassessment.org  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ready2think (talk • contribs) 21:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROMOTIONAL PAGE 

message: As prior notes said, the application pp on this entry is a total distortion. Someone is adding clickers to sell without having any understanding of dynamic assessment, an in depth process in which the assessor (mediator) takes several days to determine the depth and width of a student's cognitive potential. A clicker response is dynamic only in the press of the finger and has nothing to do with the meaning of the term "dynamic assessment."  Clickers may assesses surface and immediate responses to a superficial yes/no question; beyond that they have no value for a dynamic assessment.  §Jim Bellanca  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.197.187 (talk) 12:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad, bad, bad application 

message: I deleted the short lead tag by making the lead even shorter and giving headings for the remaining words. But what is required is input from an expert in the topic--a substantial revision. I have added a tag to that effect.Robert P. O'Shea (talk) 10:29, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Significant revision 

message: I made a revision to minimize some of the gross errors. Now, this could use a good:
* Copy edit
* Flushing out the section on modes of measurement
* Discussions about common misconceptions and controversy. 
I think it's helpful to address misconceptions and controversy head-on. A lot of textbooks incorrectly define dynamic assessment and ZPD (esp. ones where it's a 1-2 paragraph aside in a general text). There were also research communities which went in odd directions (for example, a branch of the community, building on Feuerstein's work, redefined DA as an innate learning potential, and somehow got themselves associated with eugenics). There's enough garbage out there that if we don't provide a text on controversies and/or misconceptions, well-intentioned visitors are likely to edit those into the main text based on erroneous tertiary sources. 
For reference, the canonical source is the original Vygotsky. The most common translation is the 1978 edition, which for the purposes of an article like this one, is good enough. If you are editing, PLEASE read this (or a similar) source first. Just because a book is a college textbook doesn't mean it's accurate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.17.150.215 (talk) 15:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another revision 

message: What does ZAD stand for? 87.218.84.86 (talk) 12:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ZAD
Talk:Kazuo Shii

message: Other than "early life", does an additional source need to be added? shouldn't the tag just apply to that section then? Sucker for All (talk) 15:22, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , done. Thanks for highlighting this. Helper201 (talk) 21:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tag Needed at Top for Additional Citations
Talk:The German National awakening

message: This whole article is just a passage copy-and-pasted from the history section of the Schleswig-Holstein article. It doesn't deal with what it says it deals with. It also has a misspelled title. The "German national awakening" would be a whole section of German history, but this article is just dealing with an episode of the history of Schleswig-Holstein and Denmark. Complete bollocks. I'm not sure where best to redirect this to, I guess I'll go for "History of Germany". Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nonsensical article
Talk:Venera 6

message: Talk:Venera 6
This article is virtually identical to the Venera 5 article 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venera_5
ClimberDave 17:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cardiff International Arena

message: How many seats does it have? What is the capacity? 
: All but the last, and I really don't get the question. Basketball110 vandalise me 16:28, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... 

message: ....bugs me. It got out of hand a while ago and somebody fixed it. It's getting a little over-long again and I can see that shortly it will become horrendously unwieldy again. Is it necessary to have it at all? Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 17:48, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The section with previous events in it.... 

message: When did Earth Wind and Fire play the CIA? 86.5.243.119 (talk) 20:04, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earth wind and fire
Template talk:Philadelphia Eagles staff

message: I'm fine with this page being protected, since it's the way I want it. Anyone with common sense knows, whether it is listed on the official website or not, it is not relevant to this template. In making these templates, I left out quite a few people in some cases, specifically secretaries, assistants and so forth. Nutrition consultants are not known figures and they have nothing to do with the FOOTBALL aspect of the team. They aren't standing on the practice field telling guys how to get into stances. They are in the office and say "Hey, eat this, it's good for you." I don't know who Jeanie Subach blew to get on that page, but it's random and pointless.Chris Nelson 01:11, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nutrition Consultant

message: The disputes over this template appear to have been resolved. Pats1 01:10, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, the "right" place to request unprotection is WP:RFPP, as the template says. I'll unprotect the page. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:41, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Un-protect?
Template talk:New York Giants staff

message: 2600:1016:B105:5477:2C67:55C4:6E61:F4A9 (talk) 17:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:51, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 January 2022 

message: Change Special Teams Coordinator to Thomas McGaughey 72.237.174.2 (talk) 21:22, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 February 2022 

message: change *Director of strength and performance – Vacant  to *Executive Director of Player Performance – Aaron Wellman (Source: https://www.giants.com/news/joel-thomas-running-backs-coach-new-orleans-saints-aaron-wellman-player-performance) 2001:4654:65A8:0:74C8:95B3:1BF1:9706 (talk) 22:15, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 00:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2024
Talk:Chancroid

message: wt am i supposed to do i have this disease and if anyone can hlep me plz e-mail me at <email removed> and the subject should be i will help. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.161.203.166 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 24 May 2007
:Sorry, Wikipedia does not dispense medical advice. Please see a doctor. -- MarcoTolo 00:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advice

message: Common locations in women
In women the most common location for ulcers is the labia majora. "Kissihahahahng ulcers" may develop.
Is this an actual word 'Kissihahahahng ulcers' or is it just a typo?
--Weeddude 17:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo

message: Assessed start class.  May need to be merged with chancre and/or other pages on this topic, or needs a discussion of how a chancroid differs from a chancre and why it is specific to the genitals.  Etc. --Una Smith (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: have added comparison with chancre; they are different conditions. Could be merged into an article on genital ulceration, but the two conditions should not be in the same article otherwise... Russthomas1515 (talk) 11:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WPMED assessment
Talk:Chiral gauge theory

message: "Tastes" -- you mean "flavours"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kanishev (talk • contribs) 15:34, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Just seeing this comment now... I removed the reference to 'tastes' last year (February 2019), assuming it was a mistranslation of flavor. But I have since seen 'taste' used in the literature. So the old comment should be reconsidered. Unfortunately I haven't had time. Mporter (talk) 13:39, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Tastes
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 25, 2007

message: I'm sorry, but how does this image illustrate the movie? Its (a)not even actually IN the article and (b) would only be meaningful if you already knew what it was. We should be adding images that actually provide content, not just something to fill a space.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 21:12, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Wouldn't :Image:StarWarsMoviePoster1977.jpg make more sense, or is there copyright issues? --Mxg75 03:57, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps this might fit the bill better. --Lenin and McCarthy  |  (Complain here) 05:41, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That (and other images of this type) would still be derivative works.  I'm also not sure what's so great about a photograph of a novelty mailbox.--Pharos 11:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Didn't want to do this, but....
Talk:Scorborough

message: I'm not the man to do it because my article-writing skills are lacking, but someone should definitely at least note the Scorborough Celtic Cemetary here. It's what the village is most renowned for. I think it should be part of Wikiproject: Celts (or whatever that one is) too. --Tubs uk (talk) 10:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Celtic Cemetery
Talk:Hexacene

message: The small sample of 5 of the 68 subsequent journal articles citing the 1955 JACS paper by Bailey & Liao are presented in the article, resulting in a limited and questionable summary of the synthetic, physical property, reactivity, and electronic research into this compound (all based on this small selection of primary sources). It would be better to have a single paragraph, drawn from a single text or review source, here, than to have this confusing and questionable piece of limited, interpretive WP:OR. I leave it to regulars here to decide what to do. The article is all but useless until it gets expert attention. 2601:246:C700:19D:D0D1:2941:9626:4248 (talk) 01:36, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs expert attention
Talk:Operation Sea Lion order of battle

message: You guys might want to know that I'm capitalizing this stuff...--Adasarathy 21:24, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prehaps there should be an opposing forces section, i.e. also show the OOB for the British and CW forces prepared to defend the country?--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 12:24, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opposing Forces 

message: I'm proposing to move this article to Operation Sea Lion Order of Battle per the discussion at Talk:Operation Sea Lion/Archive 1#Sealion or Sea Lion?. --Marc Kupper|talk 07:41, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename of Sealion to Sea Lion
Talk:Skipsea Castle

message: The first 6 inline external links are all dead links. Has anyone got any other references that can be used for the article? Keith D (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 21:27, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: hi 
im trying to upload DEM's of various sites taken by myself and modelled/amended by myself. this is all my own work that I wish to share for the benefit of all wishing to research the subject herein but I keep getting an error: we cannot determine if this pic is suitable for Wikipedia Commons
why is this? whats the problem please?
15:47, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  pics
Talk:Stamford Bridge, East Riding of Yorkshire

message: Why is the Chelsea stadium called Stamford Bridge? Vladko (talk) 06:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sunk Island

message: I have a lot of info on the early history of Sunk and  particularly on Holy Trinity, which I plan to add when I've a moment - all of it sourceable too! ;) What I DON'T have is much on the period since about 1875 - anyone out there with knowledge of later periods fancy collaborating on some substantial improvement to this page? Barnabypage 20:14, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improving this page
Talk:Subaru Justy

message: Sports Utility Vehicle would be usually a hardened version or model with some off road capabilties.
Just having 4wd would not in my opinion move it into the the SUV class. This is just a hatchback with 4wd, would you call any of the Subaru WRX or Legacy models an SUV ? Or Mitsubishi Evolution or VR4/Legnum models an SUV ?
And I certainly would not class the Mitsi Mirage hatchback 1988 with turbo or N/A and 4wd an SUV yet other than being of higher capacity ( 1600 DOHC ) as an SUV. Just a very quick subcompact hatchback.
Rallyshotz 21:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: I would question the Class designation of Mini '''SUV'''. 

message: This article doesn't cite a single reference... can we get some, any?  Otherwise the article is all "original work" and hence not eligable for the article... 842U (talk) 18:39, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: MUCH MUCH BETTER... thank you!  Sixthstar (talk) 14:27, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References?

message: there is no mention what model is weighed. There might be up to 300lbs or more difference between Gen I(87-88) and Gen II (89-94) models  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.241.57.64 (talk) 04:03, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curb weight is vague 

message: WTF is this move into Subaru Justy 2 ????  Lets fix this Sixthstar (talk) 21:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank You Adambro Sixthstar (talk) 16:37, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Move???

message: The Justy was introduced to the American market with this slogan "Justy the right car at Justy the right price." Anyone have a print ad or commercial video of this? It's stuck in my head all these years due to how stupid it sounds.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bizzybody (talk • contribs) 10:37, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertising slogan

message: There seems to be a bit indecision about what year it was last done. The 1991 Jeep Wagoneer still had a carburetor. That article mentions an Isuzu base model pick-up having a carb until 1993. AMCKen (talk) 22:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe EG Civics with the 1.3 (D13B2) engine sold in Europe had carbs until replacement in 1996, so I believe the UK claim is also untrue. --Zilog Jones (talk) 00:12, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Carbureted??

message: Any idea where the name comes from?  Coemgenv (talk) 14:37, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Name meaning

message: Someone edited the opening line to subcompact car to station wagon, but the Justy doesn't look like a SW at all?
--85.191.27.236 (talk) 18:16, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Since when is the Justy a station wagon?
Talk:Cernavodă Nuclear Power Plant

message: Unitatea 2 deja e in teste. Zuperman 21:26, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: what is the information regarding italy on this page, it seems a little out of place, unless someone can show that Italy is actually purchasing or has some coneection to Cernavoda.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.206.242.193 (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITALIA? 
Talk:Thelma Carpenter

message: Does anyone know who her parents were? It is so sad she died so young.  Enfermero (talk) 07:47, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDB says her parents were Fred and Mary Carpenter. Not sure about "dying young", she certainly had her "threescore years and ten."--Muzilon (talk) 01:37, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Life Is Sweet (song)

message: This is actually a Single, not a song.  The name for the page needs to be changed to "Life Is Sweet (Single)".  I don't know how to or I would have changed it.-Toxshox 04:25, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: The article says: 
"The music video for the song shows The Chemical Brothers playing the song and controlling five people: a couple, two children, and Burgess, the lead singer of the song."
Except, the couple and the two "children" have wires visibly attached to them while Tim Burgess does not.  Burgess appears to be simply trapped in a hallway looking in on the Chemical Brothers through a hole in the wall, rather than being controlled by them.  There are no visible wires attached to Burgess.  He appears to be cognitively functioning and aware of his surroundings and bored, whereas the others behave like enchanted Stepford robots. 
Also, if it is going to be mentioned, then there should probably be a link to the video. 2601:985:800:57E0:0:0:0:5F58 (talk) 03:52, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music Video
Talk:Yūno Scrya

message: Some people spell it Yuuno, the page spells it Yūno, though what is the official spelling? Or is it technically both since it's spelled Yuuno to explain how to pronounce his name and  Yūno clearly shows that as well? 71.103.79.231 23:00, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Official spelling?

message: The official website now has a page for Yuuno Scrya, which uses the spelling Yuuno on both the URL and on the page itself.210.213.231.130 16:47, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website update with Yuuno Scrya page 

message: User:Warlordjohncarter added many pages to the mustelids project very quickly, and I'm not sure he gave the inclusion of a fictional mustelid a great deal of consideration.  I see a certain amount of humour in retaining M. putorius anime as a member of the family. MaxEnt (talk) 17:51, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Inclusion in mustelids project
Talk:G7 howitzer

message: I think this page should be removed from G7 howitzer to G7 gun-howitzer. On Denel's website it is still called LEO 105 mm TOWED GUN-HOWITZER. Besides, a 52 caliber weapon is definitely not a howitzer. Megaidler (talk) 19:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The same is true of practically all modern artillery so maybe this proposal would be better placed at the Military WikiProject so that all relevant articles can be moved from "XXXXX howitzer" to "XXXXX gun-howitzer". Also take a look at the Howitzer article as well as its talk page for some discussion of the distinction between a howitzer and a gun-howitzer. Roger (talk) 19:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving
Talk:Beardslee trout

message: The taxonomy seems messed up. I tried to correct some (no point in treating it as subspecies when it is a forma localis), but the following makes no sense:
"Sometimes, they are placed in the cutthroat trout instead (as Oncorhynchus clarki irideus)."
If Beardslee's were placed into the Cutthroat, irideus would not apply. It would be O. clarki beardsleei or f. beardsleei of some subspecies of clarki. Or should this mean that the entire Coastal Rainbow (and not just Beardslee's) is occasionally split from the Steelhead and placed in the Cutthroat? That would deserve in-depth discussion at the Rainbow Trout main article. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 01:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If I remember correctly, I think what happened was that the taxonomy was changed at some point when somebody realized it should go in the one family and not the other. But it's been awhile since I did the research for this article. Murderbike (talk) 01:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomy

message: Washington Trout conducted independent spawning surveys on the Lyre this past spring and found alarming evidence of very low numbers of spawning fish, indicating that the population has experienced a severe decline.
this past spring should be changed to refer to the Spring of X year. I have not been able to find the year in question.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.26.198.208 (talk) 09:04, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spring of what year?