lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Blocked users can edit their own talk page

message: Let's make a list of arguments for/against the feature:
* When a user talk page is protected, other users cannot communicate with the blocked user.
* It's very easy to forget to unprotect the user talk page, even after the user is unblocked.
* Users blocked a long time ago can suddenly start editing their talk pages again.
* It is a strong deviation from the tradition of "User talk pages should only be protected in cases of persistent vandalism, and then only for as brief a period as possible". 
* It ignores the IP autoblocker, even if it was triggered by another account.
* It doesn't trigger the IP autoblocker.
* It is not easy to check the protections current in effect (unlike blocks, which can be checked with Special:Ipblocklist).
* Adding a template to the page to note the protection/unprotection (and to work around the previous problem) causes the "You have new messages" message.
--cesarb 23:05, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arguments against the feature 

message: This page doesn't appear to be particularly useful anymore, nor even really a proper use of Wikipedia space.  Would anyone object if I put a prod tag on it?  --Elonka 16:55, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Wikipedia:New features. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 19#Wikipedia:New features until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  DemonDays64 (talk) 02:18, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Wikipedia:New features" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Bring On the Night (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

message: It's Marti Noxon, not Martin, and it already has a page. Please anyone fix the side table. I don't know how.
:done --Scot W. Stevenson 05:42, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Marti

message: Wasn't the ubervamp putting Spike into -holy- water? Lots42 (talk) 18:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drowning 

message: Would anyone really believe Xander was going to leave the window unfixed in a fit of pique? Lots42 (talk) 13:23, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Window 
Talk:Parasite (comics)

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 17:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T  16:39, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: C-Class rated for Comics Project

message: I added a section about Leech from Static Shock. Any takers? (JoeLoeb (talk) 05:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leech from Static. 

message: This is pretty minor and I don't know the character's full biography, but the description of Parasite's power is slightly inaccurate. In Action Comics 340 (August 1966, page 5 and 6) Parasite is able to absorb energy from Superman without touching him. Parasite is sitting in his apartment as Superman flies by. Parasite feels the energy surge and Superman feels weakened. Later, Parasite is standing near Superman and notices Superman becoming weaker. Other scenes on pages 4 and 7 are vague but it appears Parasite is able to absorb energy from normal humans also without touching them.
66.74.172.89 (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Parasite absorption abilities
Talk:Crosby, Stills & Nash (album)

message: Location of Cover Photo==
Can someone please add the details of the location where the cover photo was shot?  (Otherwise we'll end up thinking it was 461 Ocean Boulevard.) Thegn 12:50, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

message: The content in the song article is adequately covered, or can be, here. Had the song a notable life outside the album, it might have its own article, but it doesn't. Hence this proposal. Rodhullandemu 23:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal for [[Guinnevere]] 

message: Especially the part about the albums influence. -- Beardo (talk) 04:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The commentary needs more references 

message: The opening paragraph of this section sounds a bit too much like a tribute rather than encyclopedic. PurpleChez (talk) 14:00, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: If it's worth including in the main article, this is background to bonus tracks from the 2006 CD booklet [CD, Atlanatic/Rhino, 8122-73290-2]:
"When Warner Bros. came to us with this concept, we had to tell them that we didn't really have extra tracks from the first record," Nash explains. "We recorded what we recorded, and that was the record. We did, however, keep recording within that same year, and we did demos." Nash says he recorded two demos for "Teach Your Children"-the first, solo, and a second that appears here with Crosby. Crosby's gorgeous "Song With No Words" was recorded in late 1969 before the Deja Vu sessions and would later appear on his 1971 solo album If I Could Only Remember My Name ... For his part, Crosby describes the version of Fred Neil's "Everybody's Talkin"'-made famous by Harry Nilsson-as "Stills at his best." Stills' own moving folk ballad "Do For The Others," which later surfaced on his stunning 1970 eponymous solo debut, was recorded at the same time in Stephen's home studio in Studio City. "We found it, we mixed it, and here you go," Nash says. Agbneill (talk) 07:38, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bonus Tracks, 2006 release
Talk:Jagjit Singh Aurora

message: I think this article has too much information that is already in other articles, namely about the politics surrounding the formation of Bangladesh, the article should focus on General Aurora and link to other articles for the superflous information.  DigiBullet 17:48, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dead code

message: Vis-a-vis standard and published definitions of dead code, redundant code, and unreachable code,Debray, S. K., Evans, W., Muth, R., and De Sutter, B. 2000. Compiler techniques for code compaction. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 22, 2 (Mar. 2000), 378-415.Appel, A. W. 1998 Modern Compiler Implementation in Java. Cambridge University Press. I have updated and changed the articles for dead code, redundant code, and unreachable code. --Dorchard (talk) 22:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the introduction, the article says that dead code _is_ executed, but that the result is never used. Afterwards, the second example states that the code in the example is never executed, thus dead code. If the definition of dead code does cover both cases, it should be stated in the introduction. 77.188.10.7 (talk) 17:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent definitions 

message: Since the example shown has effects (e.g., behaviour when div-by-zero occurs) this is a *terrible* example since it's not really dead code -- effects of a statement *are observables* -- and cannot be removed by a compiler without affecting program semantics. Dead code only effects execution time, not behaviours, and execution time is (under most semantical notions) considered unobservable.
----   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.148.35.60 (talk) 21:57, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horrible example 

message: Is dead code the same thing as unreachable code? Should there be a merge? Deco 18:43, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: I removed this sentence:
... indeed, it is by definition performing no function it is hard to prove a negative
Perhaps it can be reworded? --216.232.210.238 00:39, 28 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal 

message: If you mention Java compiler, then mention C/C++ compiler (or other) as well. Magicoast (talk) 19:54, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Magicoast, so there is no need to mention Java separately, all modern compilers are smart enough. --N90p (talk) 16:54, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Java
Talk:Flexible organic light-emitting diode

message: Reference number 9 leads to a webpage which no longer exists.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wingwingwoom (talk • contribs) 03:57, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Defunct Reference

message: Please delete this, the information is already on the OLED page.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 17:57, 13 July 2005‎  (talk • contribs) 64.142.89.80
:I have added a heading to this section.···Vanischenu「m/Talk」 08:31, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion request
Talk:Flak tower

message: Someone requested the link to the german article. Actually this articel was missing, i just wrote it. I will ask some weapon experts to expand it soon. -- Stahlkocher 17:57, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have always been fascinated with the concept of the towers since I first read about them years ago. Most histories referred to them but did not describe them still less really talk about how they operated and the who manned them.
This article answers a lot of questions but there are many unanswered ones such as who conceived of the idea and who designed them, what was aim strategically and tactically, and did they fulfill these aims?  Albatross2147 (talk) 14:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, the National Geographic show "Hitler's Secret Bunkers" delves into the armament and effectiveness of the towers. They cite figures on rates of fire and such, but not on specific Allied casualties inflicted (they say that Allied bombing sorties over the city center suffered 'devastating' losses, but I am sure it is difficult to determine the exact share of the losses for which the towers were directly responsible). - 14:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for the info. I shall keep a look out for this in our local schedules.Albatross2147 (talk) 01:13, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How useful were the towers? 

message: In the article it is stated that there where 3 (additional) towers planned in Vienna, as well as three already built towers. Do I understand that correctly? Or does the statement in the Section about Vienna mean that those three towers where planned for another spot? Please clarify. -- Uhu01 (talk) 19:34, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Towers in Vienna 

message: Nohomers48, the link you removed because nonexistent, simply changed. Now you can find it at http://www.oeav-events.at/edelweiss/klettern/flakturm/index.php. Cheers. Carlotm (talk) 21:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Righto then, added in the new link.–  Nohomers48 (talk • contribs) 22:41, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing link 

message: What is the purpose of the external projecting beams and framework?  This is not explained.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.86.117.208 (talk) 15:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External frameworks
Talk:Commercial bank

message: The article Grameen Bank is currently nominated to be improved on Wikipedia:This week's improvement drive. If you want to support the article, you can vote for it there.--Fenice 09:05, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvement Drive

message: The article needs to explain that banks need to keep reserves.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.229.241 (talk) 22:55, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reserves

message: There seems to be an overlap between this article and bank and much of the content is relevant to all banks and not specific to commercial banks.  However its clear the term commercial bank has different meanings to different people and for some a commercial bank is a 'normal' bank so not sure if we should move the content such as history to the bank article and focus here on particular aspects of commercial bank.  I have added some links for now which should help some readers but I think the article could do with an overhaul. Sargdub (talk) 22:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Overlap

message: Dear all, having visited the article several times in the past today I still found its structure below any recognition as compared to encyclopaedic standards. Therefore, I have taken liberty to put it to Order. Hope it will help. KR62.163.159.72 (talk) 10:24, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structural change 

message: Bank Gupta7860 (talk) 11:02, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial bank 

message: Co 2409:4073:4D9D:18BE:0:0:76C8:9303 (talk) 09:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economic 

message: Conclusion of commercial banks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2409:4073:4D9D:18BE:0:0:76C8:9303 (talk) 09:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economic  

message: Voice 59.91.86.5 (talk) 06:29, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commercial banks 

message: @A "Ferals" Hope in Coles County 41.114.141.125 (talk) 15:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Business studies 

message: What happened here? The first two paragraphs make sense, the rest, however, does not. ALL CAPS are usually not used in Wikipedia; also, the content appears to be totally nonsensical, structurally and syntactically speaking. Does most of the content, starting from "THUS, in ABSENCE [...]" to "not to wish to interfere)."", not belong somewhere else entirely? I have no clue about this topic, but someone who has worked on this article maybe should go over it to see if there has been some kind of clumsy (read malicious) editing going on. 141.201.151.51 (talk) 12:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subsection "Role"
Talk:Turbonegro

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.the-fly.co.uk/artist/turbonegro. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  SilkTork *YES! 20:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A series of edits in 2006 - starting here - copied over this webpage which is copyrighted and is owned by HMV. I have removed the entire history section which contained the copyrighted material. There may have been since 2006 a number of appropriate additional edits made to the history section which I have also removed. It might be worth someone going through the history and picking them out - or simply starting again from scratch. Certainly, the article - the-fly.co.uk can be used as a source, but mustn't be copied word for word, and must be cited. SilkTork *YES! 20:50, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Thats bullshit.76.92.166.70 (talk) 02:44, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entire history removed? 

message: Tony (Anthony) Sylvester is now Tony (Anthony) Madsen-Sylvester  after his marriage. How do we treat his name in the history? I don't know how to deal with that, but I guess his name should be changed also in the history. /EriFr (talk) 06:09, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tony Madsen-Sylvester? 
Talk:Jefferson Park, Chicago

message: I think it's a little unfair to call Jefferson Park the Polish neighborhood in Chicago.  There are many neighborhoods in Chicago with large Polish-American populations, like Jackowo.
I agree.  The Avondale neighborhood (further south on Milwaukee Avenue) has a community of Poles where storefronts and shops primarily conduct business in Polish.  This area is more intensely Polish in character than Jefferson Park. 
McHenry 03:21, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ann Lee

message: On another page, it is asserted that Lee claimed to be the Messiah.  Is this true?  If so, I think the article should reflect it. Jwrosenzweig 18:52, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I've uploaded to Wikimedia Commons this 1871 "psychometric portrait," identified by a spirit medium as Ann Lee and reportedly accepted as such by "many" nineteenth century Shakers. See Stephen J. Stein, The Shaker Experience in America: A History of the United Society of Believers (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1992), 232-33. What are the community's thoughts on adding this image to the article in the absence of a contemporary likeness? --Worthington56 (talk) 12:23, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: My thoughts are no.  It is not a portrait of the subject from life.  Not sure what the policies/guideline are not this sort of thing. Shearonink (talk) 15:44, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychometric portrait 

message: According to the Wikiquote page, the earliest reference found to this quote was on this website in 2009, so she may not have actually said this. —howcheng  {chat} 01:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  We are the people who turned the world upside down
Talk:Heartbeat

message: THE HEART BEATS REGULARLY BECAUSE IT HAS IT'S OWN PACEMAKER.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.28.163.222 (talk) 06:37, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  HEARTBEAT  

message: Added link to "Heartbeat", by Claptone ft. Nathan Nicholson, 2016 in Claptone Wikipedia page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.58.239.249 (talk) 14:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: While your external link at Claptone technically satisfies WP:DABMENTION, it doesn't really add much information for someone looking for "Heartbeat".  The song doesn't seem to meet wikipedia's notability requirements for a standalone song article either (Claptone himself only seems marginally notable).  Still, I'd be willing to let the Claptone song be re-listed, but not all my other cleanup edits you keep reverting.  Hoof Hearted (talk) 16:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added link
Talk:CPU cooling

message: It would be far more beneficial if the article talked a little bit about the increase in CPU heat dissipation as miniaturization has run its course and as transistor densities have gotten higher.  Only 15 or so years ago, common microelectronic CPUs could be run without a heatsink.  10 years ago they could rely on totally passive cooling methods.  Even as short as 5 years ago you could run many CPUs without a heatsink for a few minutes without much risk. -- uberpenguin 13:32, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand some? 

message: Hi. Does anyone know of where I can look to determine what CPU temperatures are acceptable and what temperatures are geting into the unsafe zone?
Yes.
Like all electronic components manufacturers,
CPU manufacturers publish data sheets specifying the maximum acceptable CPU temperature.
Please note that this is the temperature of the silicon chip itself,
which (for desktop CPUs) is much hotter than the temperature of the outer ceramic case.
Picking a manufacturer and a CPU at random, I find the
Intel Pentium D
then check its list of
technical documents.
I see the 
Pentium D datasheet
and the
Thermal and Mechanical Design Guidelines.
Odd. Page 77 seems to show a curve that *rises* with power, up to a maximum of about 68°C.
The curves I'm familiar with *decrease* with power. Am I reading this correctly?
Other than CPUs, many electronic ICs are rated to the -40 °C to +85 °C "industrial" operating temperature range. Some are rated to the -40 °C to +125 °C "extended" operating temperature range.
--DavidCary 04:59, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  acceptable CPU temperatures 

message: The article Computer cooling currently claims
a slightly positive airflow results in less dust build up.
Do you know why?
--DavidCary 04:59, 29 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  dust 

message: *http://www.3dvelocity.com/reviews/fx57/fx57.htm
gives the athlon64 as dissipating 104 watts from a die area of 115 sq mm
Ergo restore original numbers, which were intended to give a worst case
--Shoka 22:15, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Die Size
Talk:Endocentric and exocentric

message: "If a has a lion house"?   I don't get it. --Trovatore 19:50, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: A lion house like at the zoo (maybe not the best example -- in good zoos, lions are now kept in "enclosures"...). AnonMoos (talk) 00:10, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

text: Can anyone think of a better example, or a few other examples. The article is not exactly clear.Meatsgains (talk) 00:16, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There are zillions -- a wheelchair is a kind of chair, housepaint is a kind of paint, a ladybug is a kind of bug, etc. etc.  Exocentric compounds such as "paperback" are actually much rarer... AnonMoos (talk) 09:28, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Greenfield, New Hampshire

message: Sounds like a pretty suck town to me. What about the State Park? - 24.39.214.210 12:06, 13 July 2005
:Not to mention the map is pointing out Greenville not Greenfield. 69.54.12.255 03:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected the map.  Thanks! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 03:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suck Town
Talk:V2 Records

message: The addition of V2 Records to eMusic is a relatively big deal for fans of the artists that V2 carries, because it means their music is available at a much lower price than it was before and without the DRM used on other sites. So I figured I'd mention it here. Any disagreements, let me know. - Stick Fig 07:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: eMusic

message: V-2 is/was not an independent label. The article currently calls it one, and also "part of the Virgin group." It can't be both independent and part of a major label. The stated intention from the start with V-2 was for it to be an "independent-style" label, so I'm changing "independent" to "independent-style". --Strangepalefighter 23:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Independent"
Talk:Pays (France)

message: Please help with this page... it needs either a better translation or some major cleanup. I don't really know what to do. If there is a native speaker of French, that would really help us out. --Lord Voldemort 20:21, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I did some changes/addtions to the Charter and Contract of the Pays chart and I expanded the list.--DominicC13 18:24, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This meaning of "pays" is recent and administrative. These "pays" are sometimes new creations and, when they cover existing traditionals ones, they often don't have the same limits (ex. "pays de Bray" <> "pays de Bray" defined by amenagement laws). Be careful cause it could be rapidly confusing. It will be better, perhaps, to notice that from the title. 195.146.239.21 00:04, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  note... 

message: Mon pays  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 102.91.5.199 (talk) 20:37, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  French