lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kim Fields

message: I hope the sentence about one of the first truly successful female child actresses of color wasn't too POV. I know there was Danielle Spencer before her but she stopped acting to become a veterinarian. Mike H 02:08, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)
:I would say that Fields is implicitly the most famous African American child actress whose exclusive claim to fame was acting. Pacian 02:54, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Child actress
Talk:Oology

message: Needs some specification; i.e. presumably the eggs you buy in the supermarket are still fair game for collectors in most places?
144.124.16.33 15:30, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does it need specification? I would have thought that it was logical which type of egg collecting was meant by the author of this page. "Collecting eggs" is exactly the same as "collecting coins". Most coin collectors do not collect, say, circulated pennies, because they're everywhere. It stands to reason that in a similar way, egg collectors do not collect chicken eggs, because they're also ridiculously easy to get a hold of. thefamouseccles 13:07, 04 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Collecting eggs

message: Piece on egg collectors in the latest New Yorker. Could be used to enhance the article. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/07/22/130722fa_fact_rubinstein?currentPage=all -  Metalello talk 13:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  new source
Talk:Edgeplay

message: I removed the book _Playing on the Edge_ as a reference because it is an ethnographic study of BDSM that does not address edgeplay at all. 97.115.161.215 (talk) 07:15, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, but you also removed the BDSM template.  Please be more careful.  HalJor (talk) 16:02, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference material
Talk:Robert Romano (ER)

message: could almost be considered a modern day Frank Burns, but at least Romano was a competent suregon.
:JesseG 03:19, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dr. Romano 

message: Could it be mentionned that his nickname, "rocket" was used only for the first seasons with him and forgotten very soon after ? (karaakka (talk) 16:34, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "rocket"
File talk:Hoover Tower.jpg

message: What is the source for this image? jengod 04:26, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)
:Per WP:Images, photographs should be encyclopedic rather than "artistic."  In most cases, it would be better to use the original image, rather than the formatted and texturized version.  Nimur 02:51, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Modesto Cartagena

message: The absence of any out-of-the-ordinary Federal presence at Cartagena's funeral, in spite of an obit in The New York Times (something few sergeants anywhere or Puerto Ricans ever achieve) suggests that the "benign neglect" that he suffered when denied a Congressional Medal of Honor is still at play.  Fortunately, I'm told that McClintock attended, delivered a letter by the Governor, and even mentioned Wikipedia and Tony the Marine as PR's foremost military historian and committed himself and Fortuño to fight for the Medal of Honor.  Cartagena will not be forgotten, at least not in PR! Pr4ever (talk) 12:31, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartagena's funeral 

message: I was just wondering if anyone knew of any current information concerning the Medal of Honor for such a great man.
I noticed there was an issue with two links (I marked as dead) and some of the information is outdated here. I restructured two quotes so the references would be inline. Otr500 (talk) 02:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medal of Honor 

message: The US Army Service Ribbon and the US Army Overseas Ribbon....criteria states the soldier must be on active reserve or active duty as of the awards inception in 1981 which the fine man was not....the story says he retired in 1971. So based on that date he is not supposed to be wearing them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.196.133.125 (talk) 04:08, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Army Ribbons 

message: Marine 69-71, do you know if there is a better source for the statement that Cartagena is the most decorated Puerto Rican? The source you added looks to be an internet forum.  Per WP:NOTRELIABLE this likely is not a reliable source.
Wow, I sure do hope that the effort to get this amazing soldier the MOH is successful.  Ocalafla (talk) 15:00, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Yuki Matsuoka

message: There appears to be confusion on when she was born:  lists a birthdate of December 18,1981 while other sources such as [LINK REMOVED] list a September 13,1970 birthdate.Which source is correct?  Ranma9617
:There doesn't seem to be any controversy on that point on the Japanese wiki page, so I'm guessing we're OK with 1970. --Ben Applegate 13:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This could be applied to anyone named Yuki (and usually is), so it doesn't really count as a "nickname" per se. --Ben Applegate 13:31, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Many of the seiyū have specific nicknames that are noted and bolded in the Japanese article (this is one of them), so I still think it's reasonable to mention it, whether it is common for her given name or not. --EmperorBrandon 18:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First header
Talk:Anarchism in Spain

message: *  Has concise connections between the 1890s terror events czar 08:09, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes for a future rewrite 

message: Information I think is important enough to be added (either as one-sentence references or as paragraphs):
- Anarchism's role in the Cantonal rebellion and perhaps a reference to the Canton of Cartagena (Added small paragraph (26 November 2022))
- Rio Tinto strike and massacre
- Jerez Uprising
- Tragic Week in 1909
- Scala case
Michalis Vazaios (talk) 23:12, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  To be added
Talk:Statistical process control

message: SPC Lives, even if the headwords now preferred may be Six Sigma, Lean, DMAIC, Process improvement etc.
This page is currently overbalanced by a discursion into the question of CMM's enthusiastic advocacy of it for software design, an interesting idea that Deming would I think have enjoyed had he not found so many more mainstreamn applications even in IT. 
Atconsul (talk) 14:08, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why So Moribund?
Talk:United States federal academies

message: Is the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences actually an "academy"?  I don't actually know what distinguishes a "federal academy" from other federal government educational organizations, but I remember being told that there were seven of them.  The problem with adding just the USUHS is that there are lots of other federal schools.  How about the National War College, the Naval War College, the Industrial College of the Air Force, the National Fire Academy, the Foreign Service Institute... you get the idea. Isomorphic 07:31, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Force de dissuasion

message: I would like to ask a few questions about the "Inflexible"-class submarine... 
The "Inflexible" is an improved "Redoutable"-class submarine, so I wonder wether it would not be more appropriate to call is the "Redoutable" class than the "Inflexible"... 
Also, the entry for the "Inflexible" SNLE shows at "L'Inflexible", but for ship listings, I think we'd refer to her as "Inflexible" (without article). So I don't know if we should put a pointer from "Inflexible" to "L'Inflexbile"... Of course it conflict with the several British "Inflexible" vessels, but as the entry is already multiple, I think it shouldn't be a problem ? (How do one does this ? :p )
: The Inflexible is very much improved compared to the Redoutable, to that point where some analysts consider it a class by itself. That said, these "class" frenzy is probably better used for NATO armament and possibly Soviet ones. Speaking of a "class" for a single ship is a bit ridiculous.
: In French, the submarines are referred to as "SNLE" for the Redoutable to the Inflexible, and SNLE-NG ("New generation" :p) for the so-called "Triomphant class".
: The presence of an article in a name is a tricky subject. On the hull of the Redoutable, you can read "Le Redoutable" ("The one which is frightening", litterally), but is clashes horribly in English to say "the Le Redoutable". Also, some ships are named Redoutable only (that was the case for the one in Trafalgar I think)... Complicated matters :p . Rama 08:51, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page French nuclear testing redirects here, but this page doesn't discuss individual nuclear tests in much detail. Should this link be re-targeted to a more relevant article, or should this article be expanded to discuss individual nuclear tests by France?
Reply: The article France and weapons of mass destruction discusses nuclear testing in more detail. The page French nuclear testing therefore should redirect to that article.Redound (talk) 22:11, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the redirect accordingly. Calistemon (talk) 00:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Not much information about individual nuclear tests
Talk:Franz Karl Achard

message: Several documents cite Antoine Achard as the father, others including the one external link name Max Wilhelm Achard (Max Guillaume). The Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie names a Francois Achard, which however seems to be wrong. It may be the french name of Franz himself.
Does anybody have a reliable source? I am going to edit the article in a way that Max Guillaume appears as the father, as the most extensive biography here cites this name. 
-- Ravn 10:23, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is the father?
Talk:Stowięcino

message: Who is Pagel Karl Heinz? A short search for this publication reveals that is the work printed by political organisationn:
PAGEL Karl-Heinz: Der Landkreis Stolp in Pommern: Zeugnisse seiner deutschen Vergangenheit / hrsg. im Auftrag d. Heimatkreise Stadt Stolp u. Landkreis Stolp
The full title of this advocacy publication was also omitted. It seems that the purpose of this publication as indicated in title is to show that it had "German" past. 
Such unscholarly politicly motivated publications are hardly reliable enough to claim as fact that someone was "killed" by Red Army soldiers.
--MyMoloboaccount (talk) 01:37, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pagel, Karl Heinz ?
Talk:Lingual frenectomy

message: Remove posthectomy references, since the ordinary name is circumcision and the posthectomy link redirected to the circumcision article anyway. Got rid of the anesthesia reference, since I don't think that encyclopedias generally include reminders to use anesthesia during surgery.Benami 02:29, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Posthectomy
Talk:Beinn Alligin

message: Posted this on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mountains. It relates to the use of Info boxes with British hills, I have set up Beinn Alligin as my suggestions to the debate:
Hi, I found this project, but I'm not sure that it is quite right for British hills. Have a look at Beinn Alligin, a page I've been working on. I think this type of fact box is better suited to British hills. Obviuosly the "two hills one page" needs justification: both hills are munros, but it is normal to talk only about "beinn alligin" in the singular. Many other hills are treated like this, eg Buchaille Etive Mor, Liathach. Thoughts pleaseGrinner 14:09, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)
Winter descent from the bealach is not hazard free, in the experience of one of my friends!
:Actually I've only done BA by the horns route, so I can't really comment. The article doesn't actually say "hazard free" though. Grinner 10:15, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dassault Mirage 2000N/2000D

message: "It is being developed by Thales for service introduction in 2006." 
As we are now in 2013 (at the time of writing) this comment is now obsolete and I believe it requires amendment. Dawright12 (talk) 16:54, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Upgrades

message: Does anybody know of a public domain/free-to-use photo of the 2000N that could be used on this page? It just doesn't look right without a photo. --Tomwalden 14:51, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image required 

message: I would suggest the article be split - separate articles for each aircraft. I have several reasons - First the 2000N was only designed capable for a single weapon. (I could be wrong). Secondly I believe the 2000 N is about to be retired by the French. Next consider the nature of the weapon it was designed for. Other National have their aircraft able to swing between the 2 different roles.  Wfoj3 (talk) 22:31, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2000N versus 2000D
Talk:II & III

message: The album has more than one cover, mine is the same as the current, except that it is black without the Jewish star above the picture, and the insert used for this itself is only one sheet of paper, with the backside being a different similarly styled picture of the band in orange. Side=note: this insert features no production credits or other information, or I would've filled it into the album info-box Nnnudibranch (talk) 22:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Two different releases.  The original album cover (seen in the current article) was released on Pitch-A-Tent Records in 1986.  The black one was released on I.R.S. Records in 1993.  The album is widely considered one of the greatest of the late 1980s, and their concerts were legendary, often exceeding the recordings themselves (which is quite rare these days).  Viriditas (talk) 12:00, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this link, there are a total of seven different versions.  Wow. Viriditas (talk) 12:14, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Covers.
Talk:Key Lime Pie (album)

message: I can't understand why "Key Lime Pie" directs here, instead of to the actual dessert. Clearly this got its name from the actual pie, and not the other way around. I think most people searching for Key Lime pie want the pie, not this. I would fix it if I knew how.Prlambert76 (talk) 22:01, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, and I have fixed it Scapler (talk) 00:13, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?
Talk:Garlands (album)

message: Is the "Not to be confused with Garland" link necessary?  Seems kind of dumb since the term "Garland" has nothing to do with Cocteau Twins so it's not as if someone will confuse "Garland" as one of their other albums.
Deepcloud (talk) 23:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Garland

message: The track listing shows the first track as being titled "Blood Bitch", which I have also seen on a few versions of the track on YouTube. Yet the copy of the CD I bought some time in 2003 (at the HMV store near Bond Street Tube Station on Oxford Street, London, to be irritatingly precise!) has the first track with the title "Blood BATH". Is this a re-title (which I've seen before), a typo or something else?
Taff Hewitt (talk) 22:19, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Only ever seen "Blood Bitch", and that's on vinyl, CD and MP3. Are you sure? --John (talk) 22:21, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of first track 

message: Official Cocteau Twins website says the album was released in July 1982, 4AD website says 1 September 1982. Which is correct? Edo (talk) 08:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It was announced in July, released in September. Ceoil (talk) 09:44, 19 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release date
Talk:Historical Styles of the Effective Heads of State of Australia

message: This whole article is completely misconceived. Australia did not have a head of state until the adoption of the Statute of Westminster in 1942, because it was not a sovereign state, it was a self-governing Dominion of the British Empire. The idea that Queen Victoria was "Queen of the Commonwealth of Australia" is completely ahistorical and anachronistic, and would have been laughed at in 1901. The title of "Queen of Australia" (not "Queen of the Commonwealth of Australia") was not created until 1973. Adam 16:32, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Door to Door (album)

message: Please do not change the article again without discussing it on the album discussion page. The standard format should be used unless there is a compelling reason to change it. Since nothing has been added to the discussion page to justify the deviation, I am reverting this edit. --Fantailfan 14:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead vocal credit in track listing section 

message: Please retain the wikitable chart format as it is a standard that, without discussion, should not be changed without discussion or comment. --Fantailfan 14:14, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart format 

message: You have again changed the article without discussing it on the album discussion page. The standard format should be used unless there is a compelling reason to change it. Since nothing has been added to the discussion page to justify the deviation, I am reverting this edit again and requesting semi-protection. --Fantailfan 20:13, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead vocal credit in track listing section 

message: Why does it say 'dore to dore' in several places?  Someone being foolish?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.201.190.68 (talk) 18:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the Deal?
Talk:Spoiler

message: What about a car spoiler?  It would clearly be different from the spoiler (aeronautics) article, which is currently the closest match.  --Ëzhiki 17:03, Jul 12, 2004 (UTC)
Seems to have been added as Spoiler (automotive). Ezhiki, don't hesitate to add an article yourself, or to rewrite or rename an article that is too focused on just one characteristic of the entry.82.92.181.129 12:23, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why are references to the Wikipedia spoiler template removed?82.92.181.129 02:12, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Self-reference is bad. --Carnildo 06:49, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly disagree with this. Wikipedians of new or somewhat advanced knowledge should be able to find spoiler templates this way. Similar Wikipedia concepts are pretty well linked in other articles MadMaxDog 05:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It is possible to have selfref on WP, but using the  template, I'm gonna readd it. 16@r 16:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: for the spoiler template, see Template:Spoiler--Dwarf Kirlston 21:41, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia spoiler 

message: I propose that The Spoiler should be merged into Spoiler, based on the similarity of title. bd2412 T 19:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:Lists of political office-holders in Estonia

message: Hello, "Ancient Independent Elderships" is an interesting take on things. We'd need to remove this from WP as it is clearly WP original research. the fact is the highest political bodies in Estonia back then were the Councils of Elders. As an Eldership itself refs to some sort of authoritarian rule and currently the Estonian counties are also called "Ancient Independent Elderships" on WP, it's just too far out from the conventional history to be accepted on WP
. but I'd need to take time and investigate, what is going on with this "Independent Elderships" here as it seems to be all over the place and once sorted out, it has to be changed according to available sources. Thanks--Termer 22:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ancient elderships?

message: Since the title refs like the rulers were Estonian, it is misleading and needs to be renamed Rulers of Estonia for ex.--Termer 23:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Estonian rulers
Talk:Face value

message: I reverted the material linking to an offsite location that purported to have life insurance definitions, since it looked like a low-quality resource, and appeared to be more commercial than informational.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Riedl (talk • contribs) 
What's with the recent edits to this page?  The edit that dropped all the explanations of different types of face value (e.g., life insurance) seems a significant loss to me.  Why wouldn't we want to keep all those careful explanations?  I'm going to revert back to a version that includes that material.
I don't mind keeping the athletic analogy -- though it's a bit of a stretch to me, and will be too hard to follow for anyone except a native-speaking sports fan, but I see no need to drop the version that explains the concept abstractly.  I'm going to mix together the best of all of these versions.  Please discuss here if you don't like the result.
Face value also applies to bonds.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Riedl (talk • contribs) 
: When there's substantial loss of content, I note that it's usually someone who hasn't a username. I'm not sure if it's outright vandalism, or if it's just someone who is curious as to whether they have the power to make edits. And then there are the jokers. Someone put merge tags on the South Dakota and North Dakota articles earlier today, suggesting that they be turned into one article. That one struck my funnybone a little. Most of the vandals do things like changing the state motto of a state to "Go Panthers! Class of '07 Rulez".
: In any case, thank you for your kind words; when I chanced upon this page in July, the only meaning given to face value was the nominal value of a coin that had greater value as a collectible, and I added most of the financial instrument meanings at that time. If I was doing it today, I'd provide footnotes for every definition, showing where the information had been published by a reliable source. Wikipedia policy is that, if you don't have a source cited, the content may be removed by any editor, and that includes people who haven't registered. So the guy who deleted that wasn't violating official WikiPedia policy. Unofficial guidelines, like WP:DBAD, are a little different matter. In any case, most cases like this are reverted within moments (and thank you for that, too!) and we add the citations as soon after. ClairSamoht - Help make Wikipedia the most authoritative source of information in the world 23:03, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Androphilia

message: Androphilia rare in ancient Greece?  What about the Spartans and their pairs of lover soldiers?
Androphilia is not homosexuality. Androphilia is simply the love of men. Evolauxia 08:45, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: Haiduc, as far as I can see, all the information was transferred to Gynephilia and androphilia. Can you point out to me what is missing from the other article? It seems a bad idea to have forks of the same content to me — one editor will add something here, and another there. ntennis 04:33, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I missed the Magnus Hirschfeld material there. I'll put the redirect back. Haiduc 04:40, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?

message: There is a book with the title "Androphilia" and I think it might merit a page. Of course,since this page just redirects to the Gyno/Andro page, I'm not sure what to do.KevinISlaughter 20:44, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Androphilia: A Manifesto
Talk:Eric I of Denmark

message: He is the attributed founder of the St. Michael's nunnery in Reval (now Tallinn, Estonia), 1093. 
Peter Frisk
:Ejegod doesnt mean "Evergood". If anything, it translates to something like "Kind" or "Goodhearted". --dllu 13:43, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Were there any attempts to canonize him like his son and brother?--The Emperor's New Spy (talk) 14:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canonization  

message: The article states that his mother was Gunnhildr Sveinsdóttir but she only had one child with Sweyn II of Denmark and that was a short-lived boy, not Eric I.  Gunnhildr's only other child was Princess Gyda Anundsdóttir of Sweden, her child with Anund Jacob of Sweden.
The article on Sweyn II says that he only had one legitimate child.  So I question the matrilineal lineage here.  I'm going to strike it.  Iamvered (talk) 20:48, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mother