Talk:Panorama

message: I've moved the original article that was here and which talked exclusively about panoramic paintings to that title, and moved the article which resided under panoramic format here; I also slightly rewrote both articles and changed the disambiguation page. Simply put, it didn't make sense to have the main article exclusively about panoramic paintings, with an obscure "see also" to panoramic photography at the bottom. Most people who go to this article probably want to read about the latter, and panoramic photo links kept being added to the "panoramic painting" article. So this is now a non-discriminating overview, which could still be much improved.--Eloquence* 21:54, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization 

message: I broken the article into clear sections but there is a lot of very vague and duplicated content. Megapixie 04:17, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup. 

message: Been debating it for a while and finally decided to remove the "Panoramic Effects" section. It's just not very important and I don't see how relevant it really is to the article. If anything, it should just be mentioned in another section and not have its own section. From looking at the history, I think it may have been someone's attempt to just put up pics of themselves. Thoughts? Roguegeek 21:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panoramic Effects 

message: This completely new section about links to stitching tools should IMHO be added to image stitching which is already mentioned above in the article and btw could use some good editing. This Panorama article seems to me more general. 
The also newly added (and prominently positioned) external link to a personal homepage (Rohits Panoramas) is self promotion by the same person, isn't it? Is it ok to sort the external links alphabetically and discuss maybe the last one? Can I move the newly created section to the other article? Looks like redundant information here. -- Einemnet 13:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tools to create Panoramas (stitching tools) 

message: This article is exact same topic as Panoramic photography 210.49.25.22 08:25, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: From greek : Pan (all) + horama(to see)
, found from google. Reference needed
Hgkamath (talk) 01:14, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: This article could use section headings.. if that meets consensus. OlEnglish (talk) 03:09, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  suggestion for article improvement 

message: Since a 'panorama' refers to an image in most definitions it seems redundant to have these three articles separate, especially since they each ought to refer to a common history and since painting and photography are only two of the technologies for creating panoramas. I propose that the very comprehensive article Panoramic painting and the fairly lightweight Panorama be merged here under the title Panorama, followed by the incorporation of information from Panoramic photography. If there are no objections from editors of these articles, I will go ahead after a suitable delay. JamesMcArdle 03:42, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Discussion: Panoramic painting and Panoramic photography with Panorama Suggestion 

message: Many Articles include such sections. I didn't know about the "popular spectacle" aspect until reading the intro to Strange Tale of Panorama Island by Edogawa Ranpo. (Originally パノラマ島綺譚 in Japanese.) The Article doesn't make it clear, but some of these "popular spectacle" panoramas were circular buildings entered from underneath. Sort of like museums with admission charges? But the business model was crushed when movies became available. Shanen (talk) 03:49, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panoramas in literature?