Talk:Tropical Storm Lorenzo (2001)

message: *Dates would be nice in the lede. - Done
*Most articles say 'Y was the 13th storm of the season; that'd be nice to have in the lede - Done
*Lorenzo was also the last storm of four to form in October - This is a bit confusing, since Michelle also formed in October. Either remove the sentence, or say something like Lorenzo was the last of four named storms in October - Done
*A wikilink to baroclinic system would be nice  - Done
*At the beginning - As in, in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth, or more like Upon first forming - Done
*but this did not happen as - can be replaced with a simple though - Done
*Fix the typos  - Done 
*did not predicted - fix the grammar - Done
*When and where did it dissipate? - Done
*Was it ever forecasted to pass near the Azores
*Any ship observations? - Done
*Change the damage in the infobox to none - Done
*A more thorough storm history, with specific information from each discussion, might help lengthen the article
--♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:38, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Some of the sentences are a bit redundant, such as "By 1800 UTC, the forecasters at the National Hurricane Center predicted that a nearby front would absorb to-be Extratropical Storm Lorenzo" - that forecast isn't that important, since the storm actually did it. Same with, "with the storm forecasted to continue to the right". Did you check Gary Padgett for any more Met. info? He might be able to provide more for pre-NHC. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:31, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For the record, this article should not exist. The main article is God. If you can't put more than a paragraph of something besides storm history, then it should stay in the main article. I've said this for years, my stance has not changed. This article scattering is reducing the purpose of main article. Copying and pasting an NHC report on a crap storm is not okay. I don't care if it's in the public domain, it's bad form. I don't know why people continue to think this is a good idea. It's like a plague. Pretty soon, we'll be having and article for Storm Three in the 1937 Atlantic season. -- §HurricaneERICarchive 22:17, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, I think I'll agree with you on merging this one. I'm bringing it up on the merge page. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:20, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 22:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: This one really deserves a merging, even though this article survived a merge discussion back in April 2008 (April 2008 merge discussion), and is a GA, I propose a merge. Since that merge discuss in 2008, there is a minimal amount of content added to the MH, and the impact has been shortened. All of the content is in the List of storms in the 2001 Atlantic hurricane season article, and the storm caused no fatalities, damage, or any affect for that matter were reported in association with TS Lorenzo of 2001.--12george1 (talk) 23:30, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally agreed. BTW, there is currently a project discussion about these sort of articles. --Hurricanehink (talk) 23:59, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Where is this list of merge candidates? I am unable to find it, and it would help me to know this articles are under the threat of being merge.--12george1 (talk) 01:33, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Here. Hurricanehink (talk) 01:38, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

text: Go for it as far as I'm concerned... Juliancolton (talk) 01:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge