lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fairchild 24

message: The article "dropped" into this aircraft article needs immediate editing or deletion. Editors have to be able to provide referenced work not merely copying whole articles. Bzuk 21:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a month, way long enough for someone to have provided sources. I'd say go ahead and cut out everything they added, except pehaps what's immediately sourcable and useable. Given that these were the only contributions the IP has ever made, it might also be someone testing WIki to see how long we leave copyrighted material online. Not worth the risk to me. - BillCJ 02:28, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Looks like a fair amount of the pasted stuff is repetitive or not really relevant.  The Fairchild Aircraft Company section can go.  That is more relevant to the Fairchild article.  I did some internet searches to see where that section came from and didn't readily find anything. -Fnlayson 03:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

text: The section on the Civil Air Patrol can probably be taken straight out - it says almost nothing about the Fairchild 24 anyway that isn't said elsewhere.  Similarly the ATA section could be condensed to one short paragraph and integrated into the Operational history section.  This article needs to be severely pruned. Nigel Ish 20:51, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed, but who will do it? --Colputt 17:10, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit

message: The previous version (pre-02 Jan 2008) stated that CAR3 g-loads for Standard-category aircraft were reduced to 3.6.  I cannot access the CAR3 to verify this, but I do know that the FAR23 (which replaced CAR3) calls for 3.8, so I am guessing that the 3.6 in the article is a typo, and I have changed it to 3.8.  If somebody KNOWS what the CAR3 requirement is, feel free to revise my editing if necessary.  Thanks in advance.  Raymondwinn (talk) 19:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revised g-loading factor

message: Not sure if this warrants inclusion here, but Toronto Maple Leafs player Bill Barilko was killed in a Fairchild 24 crash. The incident is also the subject of The Tragically Hip's song Fifty Mission Cap. linkMike McGregor (Can) (talk) 05:27, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bill Barilko
Talk:The Wonderful World of Puss 'n Boots

message: I've been here twice, but the plot is only two sentences long! The first time I came, it was less than half a sentence! I would do it myself, but can somebody else add more to the plot instead? Thanks. --37.61.52.246 (talk) 16:02, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is the plot? 
Talk:Redwood Creek (San Mateo County)

message: *Site of only deepwater port in South San Francisco Bay
*Mouth has extensive mudflats and marshland including Bair Island Preserve
*Historic in that it was the first bayside lumber float route in 1850
*Significant in drainage area size for bayside tribs
Anlace 19:18, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Importance
Talk:Juvies

message: 22:45, February 18, 2007 67.173.172.237 (Talk) (Removed incorrect link to Lake Co. Juv. Center - the prior link was not the correct facility which is in Crown Point, In.)
Sorry, I did post the incorrect facility.  The fact there are two LC county juvenile facilities in states with similar names with close proximity tricked me up.
Thenewdeal87 17:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Link
Talk:Art of the Drink

message: The amount of external links in this article is completely unbelievable. I'm going to go through it now and remove the vast majority of them in place of internal links or no links. Greggers (t • c) 20:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with the needed cleanup, and I'm sorry I didn't get to it sooner myself.  I tagged this article with  back in June 2008, intending to clean it up later ... but completely forgot about the article until your post here showed up on my watch list. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:17, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 
Talk:Lommán of Trim

message: I'll leave this section from the 1911 Catholic Encyclopedia here until it can be independently verified, modified or contradicted or whatever.
"[...] was the nephew of Saint Patrick, and was the first bishop appointed by Patrick in Ireland.  Loman converted both Fortchern (Vortigern), the Prince of Trim (grandson of Laeghaire, King of Meath), and his father Foidilmid, and was given Trim for an episcopal see in 433. Some texts posit that Loman was a bishop before he came to Ireland , but this seems unlikely, as he would not accept a gift of Trim unless Patrick came to ratify it, and it is expressly stated in the "Tripartite Life", as also by Tirechan, that he was only a simple priest, but consecrated by Patrick for Trim.  Loman did not long survive his promotion to the episcopate, and after a brief visit to his brother Broccaid at Emlach Ech in Connacht, he resigned his see to his princely convert Fortchern, with the Patrick's permission. Fortchern only ruled for three days after Loman's death, and then ceded his office to Cathlaid, another British pilgrim.  Loman of Trim is not to be confused with Loman of Loch Gill."
Cavila (talk) 08:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to self
Talk:Richard G. Hovannisian

message: The redirect Ani Hovannisian has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:43, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Ani Hovannisian]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect Vartiter Kotcholosian has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Vartiter Kotcholosian]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Leçons de Ténèbres (album)

message: Hello!
As a music student, I would strongly recommend changing both the category and the tag of this article not to refer to classical but some other musical genre that encompasses the neoclassical (DarkWave) sub-genre. It can be rather confusing to have a musical genre of the same name under both classical and non-classical music.
I'm not really into classifying music to exhaustion, but the current (by nearly any standard erroneous, as far as I know) classical music tag and category can be harmfully misleading to some readers (including myself). Anyway, before performing any changes myself, I'd like to hear some comments from the world to reflect the common conceptions about music genres. And I'd also like to get home to my own computer before changing anything. :)
Jaakko Kortesharju, Finland (NB not my own IP, will go on providing full name) 87.162.167.20 19:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:John Edwards

message: While the Wikipedia page correctly lists the names of the 5 children sired by John Edwards, the Wikipedia page that comes up on the Google page when searching for news about John Edwards does not list Frances Quinn Hunter as his 5th child. Is there any way to correct this, please?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.226.8.226 (talk) 19:14, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia summary on Google search page needs to list all 5 of John Edwards' children, not just 4. 

message: Should the Affair/Investigate/Indictement/Trial be split off to a seperate article?  The main article is 70kb.  Also, the affair and resulting trial are notable in their own right.  Can some one at least add  while the matter is being discussed?  214.13.69.132 (talk) 06:37, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should article be split? 

message: Edit Request:  On the last paragraph talking about the trial, the date say "July 2012", since it's only June of 2012, I think that needs to be changed.  I don't know the exact date of the occurrence. Scott Reed (talk) 18:15, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I see that. Thank you.  I corrected the dates and the citation to be correct, not just a comment. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 19:53, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect date on trial 

message: I attempted to add all of the Senators who had served alongside Jesse Helms and I was able to update everybody until I got to Edwards who is a locked article. As such I need somebody with authority to take care of that for me. Please do so.--24.186.96.236 (talk) 04:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't agree with your additions, and I don't think adding Edwards is a good idea. The connection to Helms is not so foundational. Binksternet (talk) 04:08, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding the Jesse Helms category and template 

message: Reference 79 on the article, concerning Wade Edwards, is a dead link.  A replacement is could be: https://www.congress.gov/crec/1996/04/16/modified/CREC-1996-04-16-pt1-PgS3345-2.htm However I don't have an account and can't make the change. 45.73.149.202 (talk) 20:31, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing broken reference 

message: The non-word "sustrained" appears in this article.  Can it be changed to "sustained"?  Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.106.191.1 (talk) 18:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found a typo 

message: In the "Order of Precedence" succession box, please replace Lauch Faircloth with Jim Webb, as Faircloth is now deceased. 2601:249:9301:D570:3D06:3B3F:1311:B95 (talk) 02:04, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done Lightoil (talk) 05:08, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 September 2023
Talk:Šarūnas Bartas

message: *Sarunas Bartas Accused Sexual Misconduct by Actress and Art Director 2017
*Article in French Newspaper "La Liberation" on Sexual Harassment by Sarunas Bartas 2018
*Lithuanian Film Center profile
*DVD edition of 3 of the most important Bartas films
*extract of "Sharunas Bartas, An Army of One" by Guillaume Coudray
*The most complete source about Bartas on web
*The Films of Sharunas Bartas
*Article about Sharunas Bartas (in Portuguese)
Moved from the external links section, for future use as inline cites. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:30, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources
Talk:List of Tokyo Mew Mew characters

message: First off, I know nothing about this series. Compared to what I believe to be the last good revision, I don't believe this list is FL standards anymore. There's sections that are unsourced, written in an improper fraction, and questionable material and name changes. I understand the name changes are from the second publication by Kodansha but now its difficult to confirm which translation are from which source. For questionable materials, a new "mew mew" was added even though the series ended a decade ago. I plan on submitting this to FLRC if an expert doesn't address the issues here. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 07:22, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Soon to be FLRC? 

message: Should the characters from the new spinoff Tokyo Mew Mew Au Lait be listed on this article too? Pikaryaa (talk) 04:14, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tokyo Mew Mew Au Lait characters? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Ms. Momomiya. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 18#Ms. Momomiya until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Regards, SONIC678 02:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ms. Momomiya" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Kidnapped

message: Saga_City thought it was a good idea to create a long list of redlinks for obscure film titles and add them to this page, presumably just for the sake of adding every possibe title.
It appears they just cut and pasted the results of an IMDb title search as the list isn't even in any kind of order:
*Kidnapped (2005 mini series)
*Kidnapped (2002 film) hi
*Kidnapped (1986 film 1) 
*Kidnapped (1986 film 2) 
*Kidnapped (1979 mini series) 
*Kidnapped (1994 film) 
*Kidnapped (1929 film 2) 
*Kidnapped (1929 film 1) 
*Kidnapped (1917 film 1) 
*Kidnapped (1952 TV series) 
*Kidnapped (1986 film 2) 
*Kidnapped (1920 film)
*Kidnapped (1956 TV series)
*Kidnapped (1917 film 2) 
*Kidnapped (1935 film)
172.189.62.220 19:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unnecessary excessive list of redlinks for obscure film titles

message: Talk about music NeverShoutMyName (talk) 01:01, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music  

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Kidnapper,. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 9#Kidnapper, until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kidnapper," listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Theodor Geiger

message: More references should be found for this article. For example, we ought to have a reference that he really died while at sea, and perhaps we should have an article on the Waterman ship. I found it is being mentioned at NL Encarta but I'd prefer a better reference. Can you find any, or can you point to any information on the Waterman ship? NerdyNSK 15:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Waterman ship and references
Talk:Ferrari 412T

message: The 1995 car was a separate design called the 412T2, and I think there should perhaps be a separate entry for it. --Amedeo Felix 13:25, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is incorrect.  Look at the Ferrari website Ferreri World and at the link about Berger driving the car.  Ferrari refer to the 1994 car as the 412 T1 and the 1995 as 412 T2.  They are separate cars with separate "names".  This page should be redone and a new one made so that there is an entry under 412 T1 and one for 412 T2. --Amedeo Felix 17:40, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Were the cars related in anyway? (the naming seems to suggest so). If the T2 was only an evolution of the T1, then they should stay on the same page. AlexJ (talk) 17:56, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  Two COMPLETELY different designs.  It was no longer at all the norm at this time in F1 to carry over a car from one year to another.  The two 412T cars even at a cursory glance are nothing alike.--Amedeo Felix (talk) 18:55, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: From memory, I'm not sure that's true. The biggest difference is in the sidepods and the nosecone, which are easily replaceable parts. This set of images seems to show the progression of the design. (Although we need someone who can read Italian to confirm that) The biggest changes look to be in the four (!) different versions in 1994. The 1995 version looks pretty similar to the last 1994 one, although I think it's a different monocoque. The layout looks identical though. And as late as 2003, McLaren used the previous year's MP4-17, so the practice certainly wasn't dead by 1995. 4u1e (talk) 20:58, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can help for reading of italian articles :-) That page is about a series of model cars issued by Tameo. At the beginning, the article says that Tameo produced 3 different versions of the 1994 car, named 412T1: the first is the Brazilian GP (Alesi), the second is from the Canadian GP (Alesi, lower part of the side intakes removed), and the third one is the German GP version (Berger, with redesigned sidepods). The fourth image is a modification by the author, who modified the German GP kit to obtain the Italian GP version (different lower rear wing). The fifth picture is the 1995 car, from the Canadian GP (Alesi). The article remembers that in 1995 the enginges were 3000cc instead of 3500 from the previous year. So, the main change happened between Canada and Germany in 1994, as the author writes it was called 412T1B.--Vinci71 (talk) 14:35, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ferreira Gullar

message: I'm not sure what "tried to guarantee Gullar's return" means. Does it mean they tried to guarantee a safe return? 
RuthLivingstone (talk) 14:41, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hilda Hilst

message: From the request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Green/20-Minute Article Assessments. I'll make notes against each of the Wikipedia:Good article criteria. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 12:13, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the review! Will work on those issues as soon as I'm able to. — MaterialWorks 12:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women in Green mini-review
Talk:With Love... Hilary Duff

message: I understand that this article was speedily deleted because it was written like an advertisement. I'm willing to start a neutral and referenced short article on this topic, so would it be possible to have the article unprotected and unsalted? I'm able to do this anyway, but I thought it would be best to discuss it first. Extraordinary Machine 19:45, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Unprotected, unsalted.  --Yamla 20:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. It appears as though other editors have started it already, so I've done some cleaning up and referencing. Extraordinary Machine 16:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for re-creation 

message: I've removed the incorrectly formatted section headers recently inserted into the article, which is short enough that it is essentially just the one "section" and therefore doesn't need any headers at its current length. Wikipedia:Guide_to_layout#Headers_and_paragraphs states "any sections and subsections that are very short will make the article look cluttered and inhibit the flow. Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading". Also, only first words and proper nouns in headers should be capitalised. Extraordinary Machine 14:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section headers removed
Talk:Nordhouse Dunes Wilderness

message: I've been here before, and I've seen tons of bear tracks, and a few tracks that are either mountain lion of wolf, but I'm not entirely sure which.
my question is, can I add this (especially the black bear) from experience, or do I need to find a damn article talking about it? Bumblebritches57 (talk) 04:15, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your interest!  It is Wikipedia's custom to ask for independent verification of everything that is added to articles (WP:NOR).  Official verification of the presence of bears and bear tracks at Nordhouse Dunes can be found and cited - here is an example, which references the "Bear Track Recreation Area", from a National Forest website: .  If you have time, add a mention of bear sign to this article and add this link, or some other link, in brackets so that we can learn more about the Wilderness Area.  Bigturtle (talk) 20:26, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animal life
Talk:Torquato Neto

message: Mikefallopian (talk) 05:23, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Jericho (British TV series)

message: If it's set in 1958 then the 4th episode can't be set during the great smog of 1952. Jooler 23:27, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bridge on the River Kwai was release in the UK in October 1957. Jooler 23:28, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date

message: the move of this page was illegitimate and bias to an American viewpoint, the american show is not more promenient in the UK the later series should have a new article not take this one's page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.100.158 (talk) 02:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: move
Talk:Partridge berry

message: All of the reference materials I have (cited)  says that Partidge Berry is Mitchella repens.  I'll take the word of the Vaccinium vitis-idaea article about the Newfoundland use.  As for Gaultheria procumbens (called wintergreen in my books), is listing it here just a mistake?  Do we have a source for it going by Partridge berry?
Sorry if I'm making this too elaborate for a disambiguation page, but it does seem fair to give a better idea of which plants are likely to be referred to by Partridge berry. Kingdon 19:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Try to clarify where this name is used
Talk:Hovhannes Tumanyan

message: Yes. Nice page. --SuperArmenian (talk) 14:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Lesbian

message: Wikipedia Page History Statistics
http://vs.aka-online.de/cgi-bin/wppagehiststat.pl
* project: en.wikipedia
* page: Lesbian | or | page: Talk:Lesbian
Pyxis Solitary  (yak yak). Ol' homo. 10:58, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Lesbian page edit statistics

message: — Assignment last updated by MeganTheeStallion123 (talk) 04:46, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: FYI, before students dive in. "Lesbian" has been rated a Good article.  Per WP:CAREFUL > "" Pyxis Solitary  (yak yak). Ol' homo. 06:15, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The History of Sexuality

message: Change the lines: “Throughout history, women have not had the same freedom or independence as men to pursue homosexual relationships, but neither have they met the same harsh punishment as gay men in some societies. Instead, lesbian relationships have often been regarded as harmless, unless a participant attempts to assert privileges traditionally enjoyed by men. As a result, little in history was documented to give an accurate description of how female homosexuality was expressed.”
To nothing. The entries for male homosexuality mention lesbianism once, only to point the user to female homosexuality. The entry on female homosexuality should be about female homosexuality, and should not include mentions of men in the first four sentences. 2600:1700:FCC:D2D0:7C9F:FCE1:DD27:F815 (talk) 02:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:51, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 March 2024