Talk:Code Lyoko/Archive 1

message: The above is what the commercials said, and I think when they said this they were refering to Aelita and William, not to new people going into Lyoko. I admit I may've been mistaken, but before we jump to my new conclusion, we should wait and see...
:--Wack'd About Wiki 11:15, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Students 

message: Aelita's revealed last name is a huge plot spoiler and should be avoided in general use. Please do not restore it to the article. Haikupoet 06:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aelita's last name 

message: We've probably all seen the openings and closings of the first two seasons, but what are the they like for the third season and where can I find copies of them? Sweetfreek 06:43, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly the same as Season 2, except the Code Lyoko logo is green, not orange. ~iNVERTED | Rob (Talk | Contribs) 07:01, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Openings and Closings 

message: Has anybody ever thought of tracking down all of the esoterisms in the math/science class scene.  Just that I have a hunch we're all missing some interesting stuff here--probably cruft, but the obscure often equates to fascinating research material. Sweetfreek 08:50, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sierpinski-Mazurkiewicz Paradox 

message: Listen! I was looking over the Talk page for the Monsters earlier, reading the argument about Just in Time being set in the Forest or Desert, and it sparked an idea! I think it's a useful one, too. Of course you all know there's a big list of episodes on the page for Code Lyoko. This is my idea. We should put the regions for each episodes there! Like for instance, next to Teddygozilla we could put (Region: Desert). Not only will my idea prove possibly useful, it'll prevent future breakouts! Laugh. --Gravity Control
:That is a really good idea, Gravity Control.  Let us form an alliance to promote that! --Jeremie@theLab 20:10, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is too much of a hassle, especially in some later episodes. The only time this gets argued is on talk when people forget just where an episode took place. It's never been an issue in any article. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 20:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I like that idea, too, GC.  It would really help readers be able to imagine what the Lyokons are going through (like, are they having a hard time slipping on the ice or something). --User:Aelita Fan 19:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: When I write episode articles, I try to include the sector name (or names, in the second season when multiple sectors are visited per episode) whenever possible.  Never fear, this problem is being dealt with.  By the way, Gravity Control doesn't like being called "GC."  That user prefers "Gravity." ;) --Jeremie@theLab 06:13, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay.  I'll remember, Jeremie. -- User:Aelita Fan 8:31, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  An idea! 

message: Forgive me for my bluntness, but... There seem to be certain scenes in Code Lyoko which have very subliminal (implicit) insinuations of sex (but turn out to be something else).  One example is the episode when Odd has the girl from the other school, and she says something like "Are you ready for a real thrill?" in a sinister fashion, with Odd sweating nervously, and she then says, "Then take me to the computer lab!"  It turns out that she steals a computer.  Can anyone find more examples of such insinuations?  I think that the producers are sick to put in these subtle meanings.  (There are also less subtle but still chaste incidents between Ulrich and Yumi, such as at the pool and when they get locked in the Hermitage house.  These, however, are not subliminal messages.)
It's a French show. They're not as uptight. - Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 03:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It really grabs me sometimes at just how trivial the objections raised about such things can get!  As was just said, the French are not as uptight.  The old saying about "no sex please, we're British" should be complimented with "more sex please, we're French".  But the real kicker is not the sex but the stereotypes... is there not one character who is an ethnic stereotype--granted that most Americans would likely miss nearly all of them. Sweetfreek 08:47, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ironically, the British are less uptight about sex than America is. They are famous for putting inuendo their into things without actually putting sex or nudity in too. You only have to look at the Carry-On films to see that.
--perfectblue 06:22, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Look at Monty Python and the Holy Grail as well.  That's British and quite risque.  There is one entrie scene where the maidens of Castle Anthrax attept to seduce Sir Galahad into having sex and spanking all of them, which is ironic since Galahad is supposed to be a virgin.  Galahad was actually going to have sex with all of them until he was rescued by Sir Lancelot.  However, I must say that both the British and the French have sexual inuendos everywhere, and Americans aren't completely innocent either. --Jeremie@theLab 15:27, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

text: I am so agreeing with you, Jeremie@theLab.  Americans aren't as innocent sexually as they would have people believe.  I wish they would just sober up already. --User:Aelita Fan 19:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Amen to that!  I'm getting tired of sex as a joke in popular USA media.  At least Code Lyoko isn't as bad as, say, The Steve Harvery show.  That was just sick.  Code Lyoko is actually quite mild by today's standards. --Jeremie@theLab 06:18, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

text: In that case, I am never watching The Steve Harvery show. If the stories I make up involve sex, it's in the most minor forms. For instance, a girl is taking a shower and a monster leaps through the window. A little later, the girl is running down the street in a towel and slippers. That's pretty much as sexually extreme as my stories get! -- Aelita@Lyoko 21:27, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriateness of the producers 

message: My sister keeps asking this question about Code Lyoko.  It's a French cartoon, but she says the characters' eyes look like anime.  Can anyone clear this up?
French anime. - Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 03:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Code Lyoko considered Anime? 

message: "To complicate the situation, they must do this while ensuring their classmates and teachers are not killed (because going back in time cannot bring back those killed by XANA)..."
How can this be true when Odd dies just before going back in time at the end of the episode 'killer music'? Tenchi Muyo 16:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Simple. Because Odd didn't die.--Claude 18:34, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Exactly. His heart was still beating. You can hear the heart monitor beeping as the return trip occurs. - Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 21:14, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure the heart monitor shows his heart stopping because the line goes flate. But I suppose I'm out voted. lol! Tenchi Muyo 13:32, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't. You're just remembering it wrong. - Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 22:53, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  A quick question... 

message: In the course of moving the page and correcting double redirects, I encountered these two:
* Fake Anime
* RTTP
The first one looks like some sort of POV statement about the show, and I have no idea what the second one's supposed to mean. Neither's in use by anything. But I know nothing about the subject of this article, so I ask: should I delete them? Bryan 07:33, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Fake Anime is just someone's poor idea of a joke, so it can be deleted. As for the other, it can be deleted, too. It just refers to an event covered by another article (Time travel (Code Lyoko)). - Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 07:48, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done and done. Bryan 15:06, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd redirects 

message: Does anyone have any guesses as to what content will be on seasons 3 and 4 of Code Lyoko?  Considering that XANA can attack anywhere at anytime now on Earth, do you think he'll start attacking other cities and countries?  I'd like to see how the Lyoko animators draw landmarks like Versailles or the Eiffel Tower. --Jeremie@theLab 20:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Your guess is as good as anyone else's, but talk pages aren't the place for idle chatter. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 20:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I apologize for that.  I'm new here and I'll figure it all out sooner or later.  Thanks for helping me figure out what idle chatter is. --Jeremie@theLab 22:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey! This is not idle chatter! Jeremie@theLab was going to start and intelligent conversation about the topic at hand. Someguy was just being obnoxious, as he is always. Jeremie@theLab, if your intelligent comments are classified as "idle chatter", visit Code: WIKI, the place for true fans of Code Lyoko, where all your comments will not be classified as idle chatter. KFan II 14:22, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Click here. "Wikipedians generally oppose the use of talk pages just for the purpose of partisan talk about the main subject. Wikipedia is not a soapbox; it's an encyclopedia. In other words, talk about the article, not about the subject. It's only the habits we encourage that keep Wikipedia from turning into a slanging match." As I said, idle chatter. And don't use the talk page as an method to advertise your site. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 14:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just saying, Code: WIKI is a great place to talk about Code Lyoko. KFan II 16:11, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's still advertising and you know it. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 21:05, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Look, where's the rule saying you can't point someone to a site on a talk page? KFan II 01:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia is not a place for spam. Pacific Coast Highway blah • my tracks 02:59, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That rule you are pointing to states that advertisements and spam are not to be put in articles. Is this an article? No. It it a talk page, geniuses. KFan II 16:59, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't be dense in an attempt to ignore the rules. That applies both in articles and on talk pages. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 19:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estimates as to Seasons 3 and 4? 

message: Well, Season3 of Code Lyoko is now due into America by September 16, 2006. And, it will be only 15 Episodes. It is only a Divider of Seasons 2 & 4. Not a big deal. And, Season 4 is over 40 Episodes. It will be divided into two parts, and will go very deeply into the Creation, Foudning, etc. of Lyoko. One of the parts of Season 4 will come out March 2007. I do not know the other date. --AVGfreedude 01:32, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Season 4 is thirty episodes, not forty. We already knew the rest of this. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 01:38, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, for goodness sakes Someguy0830, must you be such a condescending snot in all of your comments above. This is just a Talk page, Wikipedians should be both accurate and respectful in all of their contributions. There is no need to talk down to fellow contributors for any inaccuracies. If you're going to contribute Someguy0830, make comments that add to the article, not take down the contributors.--Wikiphilia 21:03, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just correct what I see is wrong. Also, like I said, this is in the article, so we did already know it.  – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 22:14, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The user who posted the comment might not have read the entire article. Sheesh. KFan II 14:18, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Basically, though it is likely a rough translation.  Jeremie@theLab  18:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season 3 Truths. 

message: According to WP:EL, "Articles about any organization, person, or other entity should link to their official site, if they have one.". Why is the link to the official Code Lyoko site being removed? KFan II 18:16, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh. I see. Sorry. KFan II 23:52, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the link to the official site being removed? 

message: Does anyone know why Cartoon Network is taking Code Lyoko off the air? Is it just until Season 3 or what?
:They still show it, don't they? Its just reruns. 198.144.43.210 16:56, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's going off the air. Come to think of it, it already has. it won't be back until season three is about to start, at which point they'll rerun both seasons for those who need to catch up. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 00:44, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why would they do that? Bad ratings? Once Season 3 is back on, will they keep it on the air, or keep it off the air until Season 4? KFan II 00:54, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It prevents over-saturation of a series, though they've already accomplished that with Code Lyoko several times over. Fundamentally, stagnating a lineup on any channel, especially when said lineup is mostly reruns, is a terrible idea. Like I said, when season three comes along, they'll bring it back. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 01:12, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartoon network Q&As 

message: Will there ever be a Japanese version of Code Lyoko? --User:Angie Y.
:<shrug> – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 05:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Who cares? I'm not Japanese? Is there a Hungarian version of Code Lyoko? KFan II 02:31, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese dub of ''Code Lyoko'' 

message: Isn't the 97 episode count a little decpetive? I know it's the total of something, but does that represent the current total aired, or the whole series total? Pacific Coast Highway (blah • lol, internet) 00:47, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Total. It's supported by the episode listings. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 01:51, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Total of what? Pacific Coast Highway (blah • lol, internet) 01:52, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

text: First two seasons are 52 plus 45 in production, thus a grand total of 97. However, I can see how it would confuse, so I switched it to 52. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 02:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I knew someting was up. Pacific Coast Highway (blah • lol, internet) 02:09, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deceptive, yes? 

message: Who added the basic summary for Season 3? There aren't any episodes out yet - are there? How do we know any of this? -- Aelita@Lyoko 03:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You don't need to be a linguist to add the information. A babelfish translator works just fine. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 04:03, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

text: That ended a while ago. It's because it's because his link wasn't included. He just decided to make it a point to pick a fight. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 05:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Oh, is that all? You two really seemed to hate each other. Oh, and Someguy? When I added a list of quotes to the end of Temptation there was a line of Odd's that I wasn't sure about. Jeremie@theLab thought it was pretty accurate but it still doesn't look right to me. Since you have every episode archived and can review them at will, could you doublecheck? -- Aelita@Lyoko 20:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  We know about Season 3?! 

message: Announced just now on Cartoon Network new episodes to start airing next Monday on Miguzi at 4:30 pm Eastern. 
http://www.codelyoko.net/ENG/
"It appears that Code Lyoko Season 3 will begin on Cartoon Network using the 4:30 pm timeslot on October 4th."
List of episode suspected airing dates and titles http://www.codelyoko.net/ENG/News.htm
71.71.79.235 19:29, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the info.  Jeremie@theLab 
How can there be new uniforms for the gang in Season 3 if there's no Lyoko?  DID I MISS SOMETHING? -- K-9 LVR 22:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

text: In season 4. – Someguy0830 (T | C) 22:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miguzi Season 3