lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Keraunic level

message: ::Talk:Distribution of lightning Borealdreams (talk) 21:15, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Kerr-lens modelocking

message: This page is in need of MANY redirecting.  I could only access this page via the modelocking page; not even a search of Kerr Lens Modelocking, or anything similar redirects here!  I've done redirects for:
:Kerr Lens Mode Locking,Kerr-Lens Mode Locking,Kerr-Lens Mode-Locking,Kerr-Lens Mode-Locking,Kerr Lens Modelocking,Kerr-Lens Modelocking,Kerr Lens Mode locking,Kerr-Lens Mode locking,Kerr-Lens Mode-locking,Kerr-Lens Mode-locking,Kerr Lens Modelocking,Kerr-Lens Modelocking,Kerr Lens mode locking,Kerr-Lens mode locking,Kerr-Lens mode-locking,Kerr-Lens mode-locking,Kerr Lens modelocking,Kerr-Lens modelocking,Kerr lens mode locking,Kerr-lens mode locking,Kerr lens modelocking
--nyoro~! Highwind888 (talk) 06:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects
Template talk:World Heritage Sites in Portugal

message: I don't know if was because of space-saving purposes, but it's wrong saying that both Angra do Heroísmo and Oporto are World Heritage Sites, because it implies that the whole city is a WHS when it's only the historical centres. The correct name should be "Historical centre of Angra do Heroísmo" and "Historical centre of Oporto". Parutakupiu talk || contribs 02:51, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I think you're right. I agree.--Serte [ Talk · Contrib ] 14:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Oh... and that also applies to Évora and Guimarães. For any doubts see List_of_World_Heritage_Sites_in_Europe#Portugal. Parutakupiu talk || contribs 20:35, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Historical centres..."
Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2006/Vote/JzG

message: # Neutral (based on answers to my questions) Anomo 14:19, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral 

message: I accidentally put an oppose vote for him I meant for another candidate. Anomo 14:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.</div>
* sorry for the withdrawal you have my support for next year jzg Yuckfoo 01:08, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment
Talk:Cassin's kingbird

message: I notice that the article has been moved and moved again based on the capitalization of kingbird.
My personal preference would be to not capitalize it, but Wikipedia seems to have adopted a standard whereby the common names of birds are capitalized. This is apparently based on a standard promulgated by one of the bird groups.
If kingbird is not to be capitalized this article is not the place to start that argument. In my brief survey of articles about birds all the words in the common names were capitalized. I first became aware of this issue when I looked at the Ostrich article. It looked weird to my eyes (and apparently the individual that was making an issue about it) to capitalize Ostrich. I went off in search of examples to support my idea that it shouldn't be capitalized but I didn't find any. The common names of birds are capitalized in Wikipedia and I certainly don't care enough to get involved in an effort to change what looks like a well established standard.--Davefoc (talk) 06:05, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  To capitalize kingbird or not
Talk:Cerulean warbler

message: warblers have funny names!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.108.107.131 (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warbler: funny name 

message: Hi! I have been trying to get the References segregator to work, in order to convert the article to list-defined references, as the way I've done it (inline ref definitions) is very messy. However, I can't seem to get the script to work. I'd greatly appreciate it if someone could help with that - I'd absolutely rename refs to sensible titles, if only someone were able to run the script over. Thanks! Sub31k (talk) 14:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Well done to this article. Can you improve the referencing on ref 52. Thanks. BloatedBun (talk) 22:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you please link the passage in the article, so I can find what needs to be done? Thanks! Sub31k (talk) 02:03, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think its necessary now since the GA reviewer thinks its fine. Congrats on your first GA thou. BloatedBun (talk) 12:03, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Eh, one could always stand to improve things. Cheers. Sub31k (talk) 03:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant the ref 50 that needs ref improvement. Anyway, if youre planning another bird article for GA, I'm happy to help you clean a bit like at this article. BloatedBun (talk) 12:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  List-defined refs 

message: @BloatedBunI see that the Curious George depiction of this species might have been somewhat poorly sourced on my end. My reasoning for having those two is that the journal article makes it clear that the episode in question has relevance to the species ("children's television program" cites this Curious George episode), while the programming guide deepens the connection and provides the sourcing to explain the details of how the warbler is portrayed. If this is WP:SYNTH, let me know! Thank you. Sub31k (talk) 00:54, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ill leave it to GA reviewer. My only concern is the ref 51, the referencing could be improved. That's all. BloatedBun (talk) 03:56, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curious George
Talk:Portmanteau test

message: It would be nice for this article to at least contain the null hypothesis of the test. That's what I came here for. :-)
StatsJunkie 03:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The null hypothesis is "the data are random", which is confirmed if the test statistic is less than the critical value of the appropriate chi-squared distribution (i.e. if you want to test for significance at the 95% level and you're calculating the statistic up to lag 10, then you want to test it against the value p for which P(chisq(10) < p) = 0.95). That said, I was practically rewriting this article as "Ljung-Box Q" based on a listing at Wikipedia:Requested articles, so instead I'm going to redirect here and try to work out whether the statistic needs its own article or if I should just flesh this one out. Confusing Manifestation 06:12, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

message: The article claims the name is based on the French for 'coat rack', but unless there's a citation for that, it looks more likely to have come from the English usage (where 'portmanteau' is a type of suitcase into which many things can be packed - cf discussion at Portmanteau word.) The basic idea is similar in either case, but if we're going to report specifics they should be cited. --144.53.251.2 (talk) 01:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: Please? Awfully confused.Theblindsage (talk) 09:09, 26 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Example
Talk:Chestnut-backed chickadee

message: — Assignment last updated by HiTtWf (talk) 02:40, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: California Natural History
Talk:Barilla

message: It appears that the meanings of the words sosa and barrilla in Spanish evolved in the 17th and 18th Centuries. This may address the puzzle as to the exact species involved in the Spanish barilla industry. The article, which I can't readily read in Spanish, is:
Caja, Lidia Sala (2003). Causas lingüísticas en el auge del término sosa y el declive de barrilla en los siglos XVIII y XIX, retrieved December 3, 2006.EAS 03:06, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lidia Sala Caja article - in need of a reader of Spanish 

message: Found a product made in Mexico, called Jabon de Aceite de vivora de cascabel, or rattlesnake soap. i believe it is a castile soap (or maybe a glycerin soap) made from a variety of Echium, possibly using oil from that plant, and the soda ash from this plant. the soap claims to be lye free, which may be disingenuous. "none alkaloide none acid" made out of minerals and herbs. if left on a wet surface it will go soft and melt away. If this is a traditional soap made in la Reyna de Monterrey, NL, it probably deserves a mention somewhare on english or spanich WP if we can find references.(mercurywoodrose)75.61.138.42 (talk) 23:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rattlesnake soap from Mexico 
Talk:9/11 Memorial (Arizona)

message: I am removing the photo request. If there are any additional photos you would like to see added to the page please send me a message and I will look into getting it the next time I'm in the area. Cygnusloop99 (talk) 17:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo Request

message: The controversy section needs more support... please cite sources so others can verify statements. I'd like to know more about this meeting the Commission held such as where and when, but I can't find it anywhere on the internet. Otherwise I'd add the references myself. Thank, Thx1138az (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for Citations
Talk:Georg Rafael Donner

message: Georg Rafael Donner was born in 1693. He must have been a 'world-wonder' according to Wikipedia, where it states, that Matthäus Donner was his son. According to Wikipedia the eleven year-old Georg Donner was the father of Matthäus, who was born in 1704. If anyone bothered to look at the reference, it says that Matthäus Donner was the brother, not the son.(70.133.66.208 (talk) 16:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Amazing 'facts' at Wikipedia
Talk:Parallax (TV series)

message: parallax.tv leads to a domain grabber page -- 87.79.207.172 (talk) 23:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link
Talk:Laser ablation

message: Is there a overlap to Photoablation? --131.188.135.118 (talk) 15:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Photoablation

message: currently redirects to laser ablation. It occurs to me, this shouldn't be the case. There are many types of light ablation unrelated to lasers, such as the creation of the coma of comets, the process of photoetching. I acknowledge that the old underlying article at "photoablation" was just a laser ablation article, but the term itself isn't so restrictive. -- 65.92.247.17 (talk) 14:02, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|Photoablation}}"
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Filmmaking/User WPFMK

message: See discussion. Girolamo Savonarola 03:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Here are some possibilities for the merged template:
Current User WPFMK with color changes:
	This user is a member of the Filmmaking WikiProject.
Same as above, but with wording similar to User WikiProject Filmmaking:
	This user is a member of WikiProject Filmmaking.
Alternate version with an even larger logo (my current favorite):
	This user is a member of WikiProject Filmmaking.
-Fadookie Talk 01:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged template scratchpad
Talk:Chickadee (disambiguation)

message: I'm removing the stub tag to this page as it seems to invite "article expansion" where there is no article.  Any feedback is welcome.  Thanks Tiderolls 00:19, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I also commented out the expansion text. -- JHunterJ (talk) 00:22, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the bird is probably the primary topic...  When the dust settles, I'll start that discussion.  (John User:Jwy talk) 01:16, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

text: I've intiated a 3RR report on the IP here.  I've attempted several times to get the user to come here and explain their reasoning for their edits.  I'm not going to revert them again.  I'll let other parties address the issue. Tiderolls 02:25, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the content which has again been added to this dab page.  It looks as if the bird might well be the primary usage, so that we'd need (a) rename this page to Chickadee (disambiguation), (b) redirect Chickadee to Tit (bird), and (c) add a hatnote on that page to say "Chickadee redirects here, for other uses see Chickadee (disambiguation)". Might keep most people happy. PamD (talk) 06:59, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your input, Pam.  To be honest, I was surprised that "Chickadee" didn't have its own article.  My efforts here are gnome-ish in the main and I assumed there was some naming convention wonkery responsible for the present situation.  I hope that your suggestion is acceptable and moves us toward stability.  Without the anon IP's participation here it may be a long road.  Regards Tiderolls 10:31, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Stub" tag 

message: I propose (or second the above proposal of) moving this page to Chickadee (disambiguation) and making Chickadee a redirect to Tit (bird) as the primary topic (as it was in 2003-2006). Would this be uncontroversial? -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think so - in fact tried to be WP:BOLD and do the move just now, but the dab from Chickadee (disambiguation) has too much history, so it will need to go to WP:RM but I think it could do so as uncontroversial. PamD (talk) 13:26, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've listed it at WP:RM as uncontroversial. PamD (talk) 13:41, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hadn't put the two issues together, but that seems to be the solution to the problem!  I've updated the 3RR record. (John User:Jwy talk) 17:06, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for all the work done.  It's good knowing there are folks I can go to for help.  Do I need to let the 3RR filing die on its own?  If there is anything needed from me in that regard just let me know.  Regards Tiderolls 17:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I don't think you need to take any more actions. We'll see what happens next, if anything. Cheers! -- JHunterJ (talk) 17:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary topic
Talk:Abilene Trophy

message: I imagine that at least some civilian residents of the places mentioned would be surprised to learn that their communities are "in Air Mobility Command". —Tamfang (talk) 02:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  creeping militarization? 
Talk:Chinese pond heron

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Ardeola bacchus winter plumage - Laem Phak Bia.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on January 31, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-01-31. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:02, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Ardeola bacchus winter plumage - Laem Phak Bia.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Bochum Hauptbahnhof

message: The picture doesn't show the Bochum Hauptbahnhof, but an old school from the railway company 200m distance from the railway station.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.48.129.234 (talk • contribs).
:Had you actually read the article, you'd have found out it says so in the text and image caption. --doco (☏) 11:22, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image 
Talk:Laser peening

message: The 'hand-held' laser device noted in the current article is described as a tool for creating *hardness* in a workpiece.
http://www.laser-zentrum-hannover.de/de/publikationen/pressemitteilungen/2006/20060928-handlaser-hardening-en.php
Laser Peening is used to create a deep compressive stress in the workpiece, not harden it.
Laser Hardening is typically a localized heat treatment where rapid heating and cooling of the part produces a hard surface.
It's difficult to tell what the LZH tool is actually doing from the published information.
The two Laser Peening applications with the greatest commercial promise are 1) increasing fatigue life and 2) panel forming operations.
—
This quote seems misleading: "Prototype laser peening machines were developed in the 1970s, but they and subsequent versions over the past two decades were not cost effective because the lasers lacked the high repetition rate required for treating parts rapidly."  It's a direct quote from the linked article, but it's meant to lead into the rest of the article, which describes the system that has overcome the apparent limitations.  At least, that's how I read it.  For example, a couple paragraphs down, they state, "The first commercial use of the technology is expected in late 1999. With Livermore support, Metal Improvement Co., the nation's leading provider of metal-peening services, has been introducing the new product to the manufacturing and user community and has received very high interest. Hackel anticipates that many companies will send parts to Metal Improvement Co. for treatment, engineering evaluation, and production. An option for large firms like aircraft and automobile parts manufacturers is purchasing and operating their own Lasershot system."  --Mr z (talk) 08:38, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Laser pumping

message: * There needs to be an extension of the sources that describes how lasers are electrically pumped. -Srodrig 10/25/2012 I'll try and get on it. Eventually, no promises though.
::Any help you can provide would be appreciated. Personally, my knowledge of electrical pumping is very limited, so thanks for whatever assistance you can give. Zaereth (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Electrical pumping
Talk:Laser scalpel

message: Will lasers ever replace normal scalpels? Because there is an inherent difference in the result of a cut I think. With a scalpel the vessels and such would be unseal, but inevitably with a laser it would be cauterised? Is this ever unwanted? What about in a blood vessel, if you want to re join it after a cut it would be impossible without using a scalpel to cut the ends. Or will alaser strong enough to cut the immediate tissue not nessesarily cauterising the ends? Wolfmankurd 20:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Differences
Talk:Laser ultrasonics

message: The content of this article seems to be written by persons with nearly no industrial expertise in this topic.
I would recomment to check e.g. the relevant industrial applications:
Airbus has several insattlations (in Nantes, and near Madrid at Airbus Military - both delivered by Teknatom and IPhoton (Today Part of PAR).
(https://www.researchgate.net/publication/236208610_LUCIE_-_A_flexible_and_powerful_Laser_Ultrasonic_system_for_inspection_of_large_CFRP_components)
Both insTallations are a follow up of the European Researchproject INCA (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318990439_Concepts_and_Applications_for_Laser_Ultrasonic_Testing_in_European_Aircraft_Industry, https://www.compositesworld.com/news/airbus-tecnatom-develop-new-ultrasonic-laser-inspection-system-)
PAR is the equipment partner of Lockheed Martin, which has several installations in Fort Worth
Another larger Installation was once at the McClellan Air Force Base with the UltraOptec LUIS747 System. (https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-1-4615-5947-4_68)
Aerospatiale and Dassault in parallel bought a LUIS72 system, which was first in Suresness later in Biarritz. (https://www.ndt.net/abstract/cofren97/158.pdf)
Important other industrial player was/is SMS group (https://www.sms-group.com/plants/all-plants/seamless-tube-plants/lasusr-measuring-system/) 
Still good in Business: TECNAR canada with the Photorefractive detection system: https://www.tecnar.com/lus-laser/ 
Interesting development for application on CFRP: adapted wavelength generating system for excitation laser: https://www.osapublishing.org/ao/viewmedia.cfm?uri=ao-55-6-1310&seq=0 "1  kHz 3.3  μm Nd:YAG KTiOAsO4 optical parametric oscillator system for laser ultrasound excitation of carbon-fiber-reinforced plastics"
Check the following papers: https://xarion.com/products/ndt-scanning-system 
or: https://www.recendt.at/files/recendt/Files/Expert%20catalogue%20LUS4Metals%202019.pdf
https://www.par.com/technologies/non-destructive-testing/laser-ultrasonic-testing/
https://www.par.com/files/4913/9629/2599/LaserUT_one_page_flyer_3-19-2014.pdf
There is lot of important stuff in the net. But avoid to cite academic rubbish. There is a lot of garbage published, which has no relevance.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.106.177.154 (talk) 17:21, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is an article with up to now low information
Talk:Common crane

message: The source for the flying altitude of this bird is a really crappy clickbait "list" site. Is there any better online literature on the subject that we can use? Stoopdapoop (talk) 04:55, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: I think we need a better source on flight altitude

message: It eats frOgs! Yech! ... said: Rursus (mbork³) 15:45, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Frogs!!!!

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Whooping Crane - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 06:00, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: I just added a photograph of a common crane chick swimming on the Tidan River, Sweden.  It would be useful is someone can confirm that it is indeed a common crane.  Many thanks in advance.  RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 21:04, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chick photo needs confirmation
Talk:Máiréad Nesbitt

message: The article places Máiréad in the 1983 births category, which looks right to me.  However, it also refers to her finishing her post-graduate study (graduate school?) in 1991.  That would make her 7 or 8 years old at that time.  The dates in her Career section can't possibly be right, can they? --Idont Havaname (Talk) 04:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch, I'm not sure where that came from (possibly came from one of the other girls' articles when I was standardising them).  It's been removed. Cheers! -- Huntster T • @ • C 11:54, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like an anon has removed the reference to her birth year. Is that intentional? Harperska (talk) 02:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, because there is no source that I know of naming her birth year. Otherwise I would have reverted. If you know of one, by all means, add it in. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 07:01, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "After finishing her post-graduate studies, Nesbitt joined the RTÉ Concert Orchestra in 1991, at the young age of 16." This seems a little strange to me. Finishing post-graudate studies at 16? That would mean she started an undergraduate degree at age 10 or 11...It doesn't add up  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Retro2112 (talk • contribs) 17:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed...I've removed the end of that sentence, since it isn't supported as far as I can tell. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 20:08, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The dates in this article 

message: As far as I'm aware, there is not a reliable source for year of birth.  For now, I will be removing it.  However, if there is a source out there that gives this information, I will not contest its return. Emtigereyes (talk) 23:15, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Lots of luck. Máiréad Nesbitt is almost infamously guarded about her birthdate as well as other information about her biography and personal life. The behavior is part of her mystique, her persona. Rammer (talk) 04:30, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

text: Unfortunately, IMDb is edited by regular folk, just like a Wiki is, so it is not considered a reliable source for biographical info. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:31, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth
Talk:Common greenshank

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Tringa nebularia - Laem Phak Bia.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on January 25, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-01-25. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:10, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Tringa nebularia - Laem Phak Bia.jpg]] to appear as POTD