lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Waitomo Caves

message: I don't believe it would be best to merge these articles.  
The "Waitomo Caves" article is clearly about the Waitomo area as a whole.  This article could be added to, with a lot with more information about the geological and cultural history of the area, how the caves were formed etc, along with a comprehensive list of the individual caves within the area, linking to articles on each of the individual caves, and the organisations which operate within them.
The "Waitomo Glow Worm Cave" article is about one individual cave, and should remain as such, continuing its link back to the article about the Waitomo area as a whole.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.71.13.195 (talk) 12:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge. There is a lot of doubling-up on content between the articles. Adabow (talk)  05:58, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

text: Do NOT Support merge!. I live in the district and often have to deal with visitors confusion between "Waitomo Caves" which is the official geographical place name for a village and the "Waitomo Glowworm Cave" which is a tourist attraction located a couple of hundred metres away. [[User:CaverPaul (talk) 03:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

text: Oppose merge. As per CaverPaul above, I have visitor the Waitomo Glowworm Caves and it is a separate visitor attraction worthy of its own entry. Jonathan Bowen (talk) 09:18, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: ModernSportsEra (talk) 14:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Please phrase edit requests in the form "Please change X to Y" or "Please add Z to this section". I have added the protection template, if that is what you're talking about. Adabow (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing template
Talk:Playcentre

message: What is an info box, and how do I put one in? --Irishbreakfast NZ (talk) 00:49, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See . There may be more appropriate infoboxes, but this is the first that came to mind. See :Category:Infobox templates for others.-gadfium 02:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest you check biographies or autobiographies to see if they mention Playcentre. It would also be useful if you separated out those who were involved as adults from those involved as pre-schoolers. This confused me when I saw Tizard on the list.-gadfium 02:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *Get references for the Swindells
*Verify more of the 'luminaries'. 
**??? I am unsure how to reference this properly. For example, it is very likely that a Playcentre Association will tell me or email to me that famous person X was part of their association, either as an adult or attended as a child. If as a child, the paper records would be confidential and if as an adult the records would be meeting minutes, again not public records. So, how do I put this on the page?
Irishbreakfast NZ (talk) 00:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest you check biographies or autobiographies to see if they mention Playcentre. It would also be useful if you separated out those who were involved as adults from those involved as pre-schoolers. This confused me when I saw Tizard on the list.-gadfium 02:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: top of the do list (easy things)

message: Playcentre is a significant early childhood education movement in New Zealand. Yes, the page needs tidying but Wikipedia needs this article. I have removed the tag alleging non-notability.Nankai (talk) 09:57, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  don't delete this article 

message: I have made a few tweeks so that the article doesn't sound like a PR piece, and only capitalised the proper name "Playcentre" in reference to the organisation, but used "playcentre" or just "centre" to refer to the generic individual pre-school centres.  I would also tend to delete the alumni section - it doesn't really seem to be particulary encyclopedic, are we to suppose that there is some connection between going to a playcentre (or doing the diploma) and success later in life?  Should it be balanced by a list of social dropouts who also went to playcentres on the assumption that they were similarly influenced?  I suppose it is the same for lists of alumni associated with universities etc.  --Tony Wills (talk) 08:52, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  My edits and selective alumni
Wikipedia talk:Ethics

message: How about Admin Abuse as a paper here?  I mean Admins who use their powers to effect specific gains not in the best interest of the project. Wjhonson (talk) 08:17, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a subpage and suggested template for you, but in order for your code to stand the test of time it should be worded with care. Try to make sure your article will withstand scrutiny. Just my 2c. I may also have something to say about this on The Wikback. Thanks --luke (talk) 03:28, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Jutland Art Academy

message: :Article has been improved with more reliable references and corrections added, February 16, 2009. All material has been verified and does not violate copyright. The institution logo has also been uploaded, and is believed not to violate the copyright of the image, as the low resolution to identity and represent the institutional profile to the public in a non-commercial context constitutes a fair-use. Request that it may be promoted on the quality scale. --Thomaselstedr (talk) 03:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jane Reumert

message: Please see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Images_copyright_information_.28Jane_Reumert.29 before removing any more pictures. Thanks Apovlsen (talk) 10:22, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I worked on the article, which closely paraphrased http://pulsceramics.com/janereumert.html in order to improve the promotional and vague tone. Hekerui (talk) 19:01, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone
Talk:Superflex

message: While notable, too much of this article reads like promotional copy for the group. lots of the language may have been copied from some of their writings. i will try to fix it up, including adding refs beyond their own sites, before tagging it at all. i esp. want to remove the allcaps and formatting. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  -- — CactusWriter | needles 12:15, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Jens Martin Skibsted

message: The latest edits seem to be promotional of from a COI editor. My main issues are poorly sourced and external links in the body of the article. The editor also did not use the WP:BRD. Thank you,--VVikingTalkEdits 13:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI
Talk:Janet L. Robinson

message: New York (magazine) recently carried a report about the recent history of The New York Times: "A New York Times Whodunit". They give lots of detail about Ms Robinson, so it might be useful as a source in this article. Cheers, CWC 05:15, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly-useful Source 
Talk:Military Ordinariate of the Philippines

message: per the template "It is highly desirable, but not technically required, for you to add a list of good sources to the article or its talk page, so that other editors will know about the existence of these sources.” Please either do so or assert that you know for a fact that the sources exist. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 06:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Moscow, India

message: * How is this village's name written in the local Indian alphabets? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 15:03, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling? 

message: The article was renamed Thengana-Moscow in the past. I have renamed it back to Moscow, India because that is what sources call it. --Joshua Issac (talk) 17:26, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thengana-Moscow is original research
Talk:Changanassery

message: Changanacherry is also famous as the birth place of famous Malayalam poet Ullur S Parameswarayyar.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.63.71.210 (talk) 07:49, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:1608 in Quebec

message: Beginning an article series on the history of Quebec, year by year since the foundation of Quebec city in 1608. The article series is modelled upon the series of Ireland (see 1248 in Ireland for a longer discussion about the merits of such series). I hope other contributors with a knowledge of Quebec will help to expand the project! JdeJ (talk) 09:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kangazha

message: This section looks like an ad..--Kalarickan | My Interactions 07:23, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Educational institutions in Kangazha 

message: Put these here just in case some may have articles and they can be put back in article  (Crusoe8181 (talk) 05:13, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed notable???? people
Talk:Derek Minter

message: I have added prose for Portobello Straight being renamed as Derek Minter Straight (presumably during the 1960s) at Brands Hatch racing circuit.
I also added citation needed in the hope that an editor may notice and be able to provide a reliable source, although it is a matter of public knowledge (appearing on the Wikipedia page circuit diagram, for example) therefore does not need attribution, it should be verifiable in print somewhere.
I have been unable to confirm a date for the renaming, and the present circuit operator - Motor Sport Vision - no longer show the stretch of track as named on their site diagram, neither is there any relevant historical info.
They have failed to respond to an email query (16 July 2013) requesting historical detail and clarification of the current (2013) situation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocknrollmancer (talk • contribs) 12:51, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Derek Minter Straight at Brands Hatch racing circuit 

message: I have corrected the recent unsourced change which stated Littlebourne and added a reliable source. Please note there was a WP article for the village of Ickham (permalink) which was vaguely absorbed into Ickham and Well some years after merge was mooted. I don't have any opinion on the suitability of the Category shewn in this change.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 18:48, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth place
Talk:Tom Athans

message: Don't they teach the Constitution at Wayne State University?  Why would/did Tom waive his 5th amendment rights and incriminate himself??? 
"When questioned during the stop, he acknowledged he had been at the hotel with a woman he met on the Internet. On further questioning, he acknowledged he had paid the woman $150 for sex."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.89.102.214 (talk) 00:52, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Waived his 5th Amendment Rights???

message: This article should reference his prostitution bust.  Can someone throw that in?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Billheller (talk • contribs) 05:47, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Prostitution
Talk:Central and East European Management Development Association

message: Oveligurska (talk) 09:51, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Michelle Duff

message: The redirect Talk:Mike Duff has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 20:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Talk:Mike Duff]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Madonna/Archive of current redirect

message: This article used to be a featured article, but was removed after discussion at WP:FARC
There are several mentions of the term "high streets" in this article when discussing how Madonna's popularity spawned people to mimic her clothing and make fashion trends out of the way she dressed. What exactly are the "high streets"? When i first read it I thought perhaps someone means to say "high schools and streets" and made an error, but it appears again later. This is a term I've never, ever heard before.
:"high streets" are the pop couture counterpart to the haute couture of the catwalk. "High Street" (UK) literally means  "Main Street" (US) but "main streets" AFAIK isn't a generic term for "streets", "urban streets", "malls", "shopping centres" &c. Google search 
:chocolateboy 13:48, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: I moved the page to, Madonna (entertainer), because she sings, composes, runs her own label, she dances, she acts, and writes books. The only other term that vies with entertainer is entrepreneur, and it may be more accurate. Hyacinth 23:13, 14 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Gerald Aste

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:37, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:.30 Remington

message: An anonymous user indicates that the .30 Remington is the parent case of the 10mm & .40 S&W pistol cartridges. I don't see any citations regarding this, and didn't see any reference to this on the 10mm or .40 S&W pages. Unless someone can produce a reference to attest to it as fact I'm going to remove this portion soon. Tengu99 (talk) 06:41, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: .30 Remington fathering the 10mm??
Talk:Municipal Reform Party

message: Is there nothing on how the Municipal Reform Party won seats in Dublin in the 1920s? Theclownfromit (talk) 09:44, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I honestly suspect it wouldn't have been the same party, despite the similarity of name. Harfarhs (talk) 23:42, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ireland
Talk:List of watercourses in Western Australia, E–H

message: This list has no rivers starting with the letter G in the list!--Hughesdarren (talk) 12:54, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Golly, you're right! Thanks, that's fixed now. It seems the dude who split the list up screwed up, and noone noticed for nearly a year. Hesperian 13:18, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Explication

message: I have added some examples of Carnapian explications. It needs a language check from someone who speaks English fluently. 
I have also changed the headline. I don't find any argument in the section, so I don't think it is appropriate to call the section "Carnap's argument". The next headline should probably be changed too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.177.155.226 (talk) 14:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Carnap

message: I deleted the passage:
Sadly the differences between explication and explication de texte are sometimes ignored, so that explication de texte is often wrongly labelled as explication. The confusion is sometimes compounded by search engine results which tend to group 'explication' and 'explication de texte' in the same list of results.
because it was uncited, doesn't seem to represent common knowledge, and possible reflects the opinion of whoever authored it.  If you have a problem with that, feel free to argue it here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.23.22.159 (talk) 15:39, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Explication de texte

message: Hey all,
I noticed that the section about semantic explication said that "these explications can fit into natural language, even if it sounds very awkward."
I think it would be useful to explain what it means for an explication to "fit into" natural language.
My first guess would be that wherever the original word appears, it can be replaced by its explication without any other modification of the text. The example given doesn't follow that understanding: 
The clown looks [happy]
is replaced by
The clown looks like [the explication for happy] (emphasis added).
So it would be good to clarify what it means for an explication to fit, or to find a different example.
Thanks for reading!
JonathanHopeThisIsUnique (talk) 22:19, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semantic explication 

message: The section was previously titled "Explication as a process versus explication as an outcome" and was uncited. I have changed the section and cited it accordingly. Ainsmcf (talk) 04:35, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the word "explication" 

message: I went ahead and added an additional sentence to the lead to summarize the section about explication in analytical philosophy and literary analysis/criticism. 
CaptainKiser (talk) 01:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information Added to Lead
Talk:Anabranch

message: The last sentence of the section Word Useage and Related Terms is as follows:
::"A bayou is often anabranch."
Does it mean "a bayou is often an an anabranch", or "a bayou is often anabranched?".  As it stands, I do not believe it is proper English grammer, or even makes sense. I'd correct it if I knew which was true but I don't so I won't. Is there anyone who does know and is willing to remedy this?  Shanoman (talk) 15:34, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

message: The main article on the Darling River seems not to mention the Anabranch.  Presumably, this section of the Darling River technically constitutes a delta into the Murray River.  The article on the Murray-Darling Basin mentions a different anabranch of the Murray (the Edward River).  121.209.192.48 (talk) 23:10, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darling River Anabranch 

message: I hit this page after running into some terminology problems in a paper. It answered all my questions in the first two sections. Remarkable. Obviously a great deal more can and ought to be included in a full-scale article, but more articles ought to start with a little glossary, as this one does. Augwhite (talk) 23:56, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology 

message: Is the Pregolya River a European example? It features in the Königsberg bridges problem, and for several kilometers upstream of the city it has two roughly parallel branches. 130.243.68.165 (talk) 13:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pregolya River
Talk:Marcus R. Ross

message: This guy elevates Cognitive dissonance into an art. A link should probably be provided somewhere in the article. Raul654 (talk) 15:47, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: First you'd need to find a WP:BLP-quality RS that actually give a damn about him. ;) HrafnTalkStalk(P) 11:32, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Link needed
Talk:Magnolia Network

message: Reporting to HBO's head rather than the head of U.S. Networks does not necessarily mean the network is owned by Home Box Office, Inc. in the WBD corporate structure. I have reverted any edits that make this claim on-sight as an unsourced claim; if you find any source that truly establishes otherwise, please let me know. ViperSnake151  Talk   00:45, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: HBO involvement 

message: I will do everything I can to let all my friends and family know that your agreement with the Trans movement and strongly advise them to never shop or support any of your corporations when possible. SHAME ON YOU !! 73.196.239.195 (talk) 17:18, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  TARGET 🎯
Template talk:Scottish Parliament constituencies and regions (1999–2011)

message: Now that the first periodical review of Holyrood constituencies and regions is well under way and Scottish Parliament constituencies and regions has been split into three articles ('overview', '1999 to 2011', and 'from 2011') I am thinking this template, Template talk:Scottish Parliament, should look more like Template:Scottish Westminster constituencies (style 2). Laurel Bush (talk) 12:36, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First periodical review
Talk:Albert Lévy (photographer)

message: The category (1845 births) and the text of the biography (either 1847 or 33 in 1876!) all agree in locating his birth in the 1840s, but are inconsistent with each other. Dsp13 (talk) 11:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth confusion
Talk:Japanese variety show

message: nobody could come up with any more than this?  i'll come back when i can but... do a "variety show" search at Japan Times and you ought find volumes (i'll make a quick search now while i have at least a minute)...  i know the problems with articles like this are about reporting Japanese topics to an English speaking readership, but seeing as this article is rated "high-importance" i think contributors should pay more attention to this than, say, the minutiae of AKB48~ Japanglish (talk) 15:38, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  very poor quality for an article of importance 

message: I agree with the person before on how there isn't a lot of information on this topic when it can be a really important topic. I am currently enrolled in a course in university where I am to take up an article and edit it and I chose this one. I would like to try to contribute and add more information to make this a better topic. I have a few sources I will be using to contribute to this for anything I add. I would like to add a history section because I think that is rather important to see how Japanese Variety shows even came to be. I also would like to add more shows to the list since I am sure there are plenty out there. I also would like to add a section to try and compare U.S. Shows Vs Japanese Variety shows and see what makes Japanese variety shows more popular and if they are actually more popular. I will list the sources I plan on using and if anyone else is working on this and has any advice on more sources that would be helpful. 
Sources:
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1961236457?pq-origsite=primo
http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?&id=GALE|A189832730&v=2.1&u=marriottlibrary&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w&authCount=1
http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.lib.utah.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=55&sid=b35c50cb-4f20-40c8-b79f-bf454519883a%40sessionmgr4010&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=15162611&db=f3h  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kstargel (talk • contribs) 00:44, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contributing