lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ninjaken

message: The part about putting shortswords in long scabbards may be true. What's definetly not true is the stated reason for doing so. What it has at the moment is utter tripe about the supid old Ninja vs Samurai thing. It says it's to hide being a Ninja so the Samurai won't execute them. This is wrong for two reasons: Firstly, the Ninja were Samurai from some areas. Secondly, the real reason is subterfuge and a faster iaijutsu strike. And do we really suppose only Ninja to have employed that trick. (Sun Tzu in the Art of War disscusses and encorages such tactics. In broader terms, of course.)
I'm eding out the BS. I'll put in the quicker draw, etc. instead. But I'm not sure this page deserves to live. Redirect to Ninjato, I'd say.
Even if left, it needs a total purge, just about. And in the mean time it need to be tagged as missing sources, utter tripe, etc. Only I'm not sure how to do that.
Do you just add it to the catagory?
The Japanese article is under "Shinobi-gatana", so it should probably be under that or "Ninjatō".  I've never even heard of "Ninjaken".  I'll probably move it unless someone says otherwise. Evan1975 22:03, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  More False Information 

message: before anyone makes further claims source your statements, otherwise there is no reason to object the inclusion of Jedi lightsabers into the discussion. Wandalstouring 19:05, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Friendship of peoples

message: Lenin appears to call Tsarist Russia the "prison of the peoples", in On the National Pride of the Great Russians, which surely could be a simple translation difference. However, he refers to it not as his own phrase, "... in a country which has been rightly called..."
Later in the same paper, Lenin quotes Chernyshevsky of referring to Russia as "A wretched nation, a nation of slaves, from top to bottom—all slaves." -Rholton 23:01, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the link and the exact quote, I incorporated them into the article. Can't find the author yet. ←Humus sapiens←Talk 00:36, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice bit of detective work on the origins of the phrase. It's almost worth an article page of its own. -Rholton 06:27, 5 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Category talk:Romance languages

message: where Spanish, Catalan, occitan, mirandese, etc...-Pedro 23:01, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: waiting for someone to add them? :) Lupin 23:35, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  where can I add? -Pedro 17:30, 18 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I cleaned up this category, mostly according to Romance languages tree at Ethnologue.
I put specific languages under their respective groups. This includes major ones like Italian and Spanish.
In the meantime i am only leaving here a few languages whose categorization is disputed. --Amir E. Aharoni 16:58, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up
Talk:Carinthians

message: The whole first bullet is very suspect. "Kranjci" would be called "Carniolans" in English, not "Carinthians", and there is at present definitely no "ethnic group" called that. Before 1848, the term "Kranjci" was frequently used to mean "Slovenians". It's not even much used as a regional designation anymore - it's been mostly supplanted by "Dolenjci", "Gorenjci" and "Notranjci" (Upper Carniolans, Lower Carniolans and Inner Carniolans).
I think that this page should be deleted (possibly redirected to Carinthia). I'll wait a couple of days for possible citation of sources, though. Zocky 23:36, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, Igor. Say no more. --Joy [shallot] 11:32, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show controversy

message: There are discussion currently underway at Files for Discussion to purge notable award ceremony images from the project.  Specifically:
* Will Smith slaps Chris Rock
*Janet Jackson and Justing Timberlake's wardrobe malfunction
* Kanye West grabs the mic at VMA 2009.    
Comments encouraged.   Feoffer (talk) 21:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Image deletion proposals

message: I found two problems with this quote:
"[The furor] is hypocritical, with everything you see on TV. There are more important thing to focus on than a woman's body part, which is a beautiful thing. There's war, famine, homelessness, AIDS. [...] They needed something to focus on instead of the war, and I was the perfect vehicle for that. [...] People are going to think what they want. It was an accident. It was not a stunt."
– Jackson questioning media's focus on the event.
I thought "Hey, shouldn't it be more important things?", so I checked the source and could not find the quote in the source. -abbedabbtalk 21:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I did find the quote here, though: https://www.gawker.com/nipplegate-at-10-how-justin-won-superbowl-xxxviii-and-1511051968, but not sure if they got it from somewhere else. -abbedabbtalk 21:41, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with a quote
Talk:Quasi-satellite

message: :A quasi-satellite is an object similar to a planet or satellite, but its orbit encompasses both its planet and the planet's star.
This is still confusing, because the orbits of true moons orbiting a planet also encompass the star simply by following the planet. Also "is an object similar to a planet or satellite" is not informative, because the definition of a quasi-satellite is all about its orbits (so I have removed at least this).  Does anyone know a rigorous definition that lets you determine whether an object is a true or quasi satellite? Deuar 12:35, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition 

message: Could someone please explain what the difference is between quasi-satellite, co-orbital moon, and objects on horseshoe orbits? The text is not too clear. Aren't objects in horseshoe orbits about the Earth in a 1:1 mean motion resonanance, at least temporarily? I would like to categorize all these objects accordingly, but its not clear if the planetary community even has a clear definition of what these things are. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lunokhod (talk • contribs) 11:41, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between [[quasi-satellite]], [[co-orbital moon]], and object on [[horseshoe orbit]]s 

message: Couldn't Pluto be a Quasi-satellite of Uranus? Their orbits do cross.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Greggydude (talk • contribs) 13:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No, read the description of a quasi-satellite's orbit. It must be the same period as the planet, which is not true for Pluto. Uranus takes around 84 years to orbit the Sun once, but Pluto takes almost 250 years. 71.104.187.210 (talk) 09:25, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Pluto

message: Footnote 4 appears to be dead. A Russian-speaker could confirm that and possibly get more information; the link goes to what looks like a short error message in Russian.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.182.240.194 (talk) 14:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  broken link

message: I was doing some modeling in Celestia with quasi-satellites and found that the view of the quasi-satellite from the planet is actually not "an oblong retrograde loop around the planet" (quoted from page). It does so relative to the central star, but relative to the background stars, a quasi-satellite appears to simply occilate back and forth within a fixed region of sky. Not sure if there's a reference somewhere, but it might be worth a look. 71.104.187.210 (talk) 09:25, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perspective from Planet 

message: From the definition given in the article I don't see why Arawn in particular rather than plutinos in general should be considered (accidental) quasi-satellites of Pluto. Am I missing something? Lavateraguy (talk) 16:34, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plutinos
Talk:Season (sports)

message: There ought to be a way to unify this article with the stub about seasons in broadcasting stuck at the end of the main Season article. --Smack 00:09, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: : the time when the bulk of games are played
That must be improved! These rhetorical questions may help. Is it generally true, historically and across sports and continents, that regular seasons are scheduled in advance by the leagues (as in the US majors)?  
What is the difference between "league" and "cup" competitions that occur in-season? Presuming that neither one is scheduled by the leagues in advance: Do they differ regarding whether (a) clubs are responsible for arranging their own matches, (b) match-ups depend on the progress of the regular season, (c) match-ups depend on the progress of the special league/cup competition? 
In other words, I hope this section may be rewritten using the concept of a schedule, perhaps a league schedule. --P64 (talk) 15:53, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  regular season 

message: is thre something more irrelevant that the only 5 teams United Football League (2009–) started in 2009?--Feroang (talk) 04:03, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Even though it may be the top level of professional football played in the US this fall, it's not a league of the same caliber as the rest of the table. I'd endorse removing it. —C.Fred (talk) 04:17, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  UFL? 

message: We can not put the near 2000 seasons in that table, for the 192 countries (UN members) in the world, and the 26 sport in the Summer Olympic Games, also the winter/snow sports, also we have not space to put the Sex Championaship that I and my friend play in saturdays. 
*I suggest we use a 1.000.000 attendance by season as minimus limit, base on List of attendance figures at domestic professional sports leagues. I guess that limit take out the UFL, and the Assoc-Football Ligue of Luxemburgo. 
*I Think also we should promote internationals event season over national or provintial season. 
*Finnaly the best league of that sport, because the low tier baseball season of that football-lover-country is not relevant. (Sorry for language, in every sense.)
*I suppor we do articles as "Season sports in Canada" and "Season in Rugby League" to more longer specific details tables, also we need a rule about how name that articles.--Feroang (talk) 00:46, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Season table justification to add and stay 

message: What I removed was completely unsourced but my edit was reverted.   I see virtually no sources on many sections here. 66.235.168.216 (talk) 07:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  unsourced
Talk:List of rulers of Slovakia

message: Question:
Who was that Ladislaus Bold and Vazul? As far as I am concerned, 990-1018 Slovakia belonged to Poland. Cautious 00:12, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Older discussions

message: 1) per name, this list in its present form is an invention. Slovakia exists as Slovakia since 1993. And for a short time between 1938-1945, wich, since Hitler gave the independence, is also constantly getting deleted or supressed from articles as "non relevant", , .
2) This list is ok only if it is renamed to "List of rulers of the territory of present day Slovakia" --Rembaoud (talk) 06:57, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  name+iclusion criteria=confusion
Talk:Human variability

message: Psychic Ability? Seriously? Tombrabbin (talk) 00:43, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common human variations  

message: You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of  Anthropology and Human Biology Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human genetics and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library system at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to other academic libraries in the same large metropolitan area) and have been researching these issues sporadically since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by  suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human genetics to edit them according to the  Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 01:35, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations list useful for updating this article and related articles 

message: Article scope is almost comically out of bounds. 
The page appears to propose to list everything conceivable associated with humans that may be quantifiable and then discuss how anything measurable will exhibit variability.
This is not a viable approach to writing an encyclopedia article. Please WP:TNT and split into existing pages on notable types of variability. --dab (𒁳) 10:08, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a terrible article. I'm not sure how to salvage it. Improving the resources would be a start, but it needs so much more than that. GBFEE (talk) 18:55, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Category talk:Writers by genre

message: I don't see the point of this subcategory - it just makes the subsubcategories harder to find.  Why can't they all be subcategories of Writers?--Henrygb 11:35, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this category be removed?

message: There's already a ; just fyi. Cheers, ♥ Her Pegship♥ 16:59, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  For fiction 

message: waht is the difference between this category and :Category:Writers by format ??
Example:
* Category:Biographers is under the both of this two categories !! 
so please Explain to me.
--نسر برلين (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writers by format & difference
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternative Medicine/Checklist

message: The rules are very simple here.  
# If you want to edit this WikiProject, then we are asking for the simple courtesy of registering yourself as a Public Participant in this WikiProject in the main project page. Most WikiProjects follow this same practice. 
# All comments made on our talk pages must be friendly.
#* Hostile comments and / or personal attacks are subject to being refactored out by any of our public participants.
# This talk page should be reserved for discussions about conducting compliance audits with the checkelist of key questions.
#* Any off-topic comments and criticisms that have been addressed in the project page will be archived for historical purposes.
-- John Gohde 01:55, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: The rules are very simple here.
Talk:Obdurodon

message: Riversleigh is in Queensland. It is west of Mt Isa, near the border with the Northern Territory.
It is not in the vicinity of New South Wales as this article states.
This needs to be corrected. I haven't done so as there is also a field called "Living Room", and I'm not sure what this is referring to. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Belfry (talk • contribs) 05:44, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I noticed that as well. Living room appears to have disappeared. T.carnifex (talk) 04:36, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New South Wales??? Huh? 

message: I'm a little unsure about actually assigning a habitat to these animals. In my opinion, there are insufficient sites of that age to show a clear distribution. For instance, Obdurodon dicksoni may have inhabited parts of what is the Northern Territory today.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by T.carnifex (talk • contribs) 04:50, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Habitat 

message: Either all three are the same genus or they aren't:  One of them either has a wrong name or it has been listed in the wrong article. Bob the Wikipedian (talk) 20:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the text for Monotrematum. Fossil classification is a little loose sometimes. Given the breadth of data inthis article, it might be better to rename it than do anything else. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds to me like someone needs to redefine Obdurodon in a new species paper to include this species. Bob the Wikipedian (talk) 21:54, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genus 

message: I just came across this article, Riversleigh Platypus, which is a restatement of the information here under a "common" name that i cant find any references to.  I propose the info there be merged to the O. dicksoni section here and that page be mad e a redirect. Thoughts?--Kevmin (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless the article can be rewritten, or at least moved to its scientific name, I agree we should redirect "Riversleigh Platypus" back here.--Mr Fink (talk) 19:45, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riversleigh Platypus merge 
Talk:Sleep apnea

message: :Workplan-> edit lead section for sleep apnea, update missing references, move information that is not reflected in the body of the article out of the lead section, add information regarding diagnosis of CSA and OSA, add citations for risk factors section.
Hdnguy35 (talk) 19:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: 2023-24 WikiMed Directed Studies

message: Lead
The lead section does include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article’s topic.  The lead section mentions the link between Alzheimer’s disease and OSA, however, this is not discussed in the content of article. The lead section is a bit overly detailed.
Content
Additional content added into the "signs and symptoms" and "risk factors" sections provide more easy-to-understand information with added citations. Overall, the article content provides comprehensive information on the topic.
Tone and balance
The article content is neutral. There are no claims that appear heavily biased toward or attempt to persuade the reader in favor of  any particular position.
Source and references
The added content is backed by a reliable secondary source and the content accurately reflects what the cited sources say. The sources are current and reflect the available literature on the topic. The links work. 
Organization
The content added is well written and easy to read. It is free of grammatical and spelling errors. 
Overall impressions
The content added makes the lead section easier to read and understand.
Knn0059 (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023-24 WikiMed Directed Studies - Peer Review 

message: I replaced the picture of the ancient CPAP device with one of a newer model. It would be nice if we could get some more up to date pictures of CPAP masks as well. Maybe with a bit of diversity in patients: overweight while males are not the only ones with sleep apnea. Nimlhûg (talk) 16:49, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More modern pictures 

message: Added direct links to the other Wikipedia page about hypoglossal nerve stimulator. Prophylax (talk) 20:31, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Should there be discussion of the latest technology advancements to treating OSA? Prophylax (talk) 20:32, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Management
Talk:Kingdomtide

message: does any one know when "kingdomtide" was removed from the liturgical calendar?  I am a fairly new Methodist.  I was trained in the Episcopal Church USA.  I still observe the liturgical seasons and traditions.
You'll find that now the liturgical seasons are practically identical to what you had in the Episcopal Church.  Kingdomtide was abandoned with the last Book of Worship which I believe was approved in 1988, but I'm not certain with that.  Observance of Kingdomtide extended into the early 90s by inertia, but I know of no United Methodists who observe Kingdomtide any more.
Note 'KingdomTide' is not found from cited link (http://www.asburyreader.com) Pythium (talk) 14:36, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

message: The article 'Feast of Christ the King' states that it is still observed in the Church in Wales, some Lutheran churches and some Methodist churches. Mdrb55 (talk) 12:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still observed in some churches!
Talk:Cooking banana

message: There is no such thing as a "carbohydrate requirement". Also, the wikipedia page that the expressions links to, makes no mention of a "carbohydrate requirement". Probably, was meant "caloric requirement", or "energy requirement" or something like that. Please fix.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drsruli (talk • contribs) 23:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anyone work out what WP:ENGVAR this article is supposed to be written in? Its early history is very tangled and it has been edited back and forth by so many different people, it's not at all clear to me. Currently there are some "-our" spellings (e.g. "colour") but also some "-ize" spellings (e.g. "caramelize"), so there's no consistency. Peter coxhead (talk) 17:08, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ENGVAR of article 

message: Please see Template_talk:Comparison_of_major_staple_foods#Fresh%2Fdry_comparisons regarding a proposed change to the template transcluded in this article. SmartSE (talk) 12:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Staple crop comparison table 

message: Plantain and bananas are not the same thing. Neither are they referred to as cooking bananas. You can cook them or eat rhem raw depending on whether they ate ripe or not. Plantains belong to the same family as bananas but are indeed different in size, taste and texture. 76.69.81.75 (talk) 14:49, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read the opening of the article and the discussion at Banana#Bananas and plantains. Both terms, banana and plantain, have multiple meanings that differ between countries that use these terms. Thus in the production table at Banana#Production and export, you'll see that some countries separate bananas (generally meaning "dessert bananas") from plantains (generally but not always meaning "cooking bananas"), while others do not. Our articles are sourced, and the result of detailed discussions, which included some banana biologists. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plantain 

message: Hello  Why did you revert edits by myself and ? Invasive Spices (talk) 19:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This page has overlinks, red links, and recipes and blogs as references. Achmad Rachmani (talk) 21:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reversion 

message: — Assignment last updated by Marimilan (talk) 18:47, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Public Writing Fall 2021 F1
Talk:Save Karyn

message: I will not be able to finish this article tonite. I consider everything from "Growing the site" to the "External links", to be a stub I can add to in the near future.  With over 5K hits for "save karyn", I consider the subject sufficiently notable/verifiable. I have specifically added redirs, and worded it, so as to minimize "hangers-on" articles. Her site I believe is notable, copycats, not. I first found it long before her book, and before her goal was reached. In the interests of full disclosure, I have her book, and have read (only) part of it--it is a partial reference for this article. I will probably contact her for verification/clarification. Niteowlneils 03:26, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: I

message: This page seems awfully pro-Karyn biased. Also note the use of weasel words ("many people believe...")
This page is little more than an advertisement for a cyber-beggar, most likely written by the beggar herself. Deletion worthy, for sure.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.150.130.29 (talk) 19:24, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: This