lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:History of Christianity in Ukraine/Archive 1

message: This article needs some historical background, from Russian Imperial times, Cossack era, and before.
Genyo 17:40, 15 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: Currently, the acrticle uses the phrase "Ukrainian domination of the Russian Orthodox Church" for the aftermath of the transfer of Patriarchy. While certainly flattering for the Ukrainian clergy, I think this is too a radical statement. Was it really a "domination" or could we use a softer word? --Irpen 02:36, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ukrainian influence in ROC in 17th-18th centuries
Talk:Trevor Belmont

message: Trevor was not the first Belmont to kill Dracula, Sonia was.  Sonia killed Drac in 1450, while Trevor did so in 1476.  I've removed the error from the trivia section.  Aspect Of Shadows 18:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: First Belmont

message: Having seen this article on the requests for assessment, I don't understand the need for this article beyond what's in Castlevania characters#Trevor Belmont (1476-1479). The various discussions of what is or is not canon (a loaded word in and of itself), commentary like "very exposed thighs", and a complete lack of anything resembling a true out-of-universe perception, all lead me to suspect this article is unnecessary.
As such, my suggestion is that this article be redirected to the main characters list. Nifboy 09:50, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: +1 to Nifboy. Now get on with it! --User:Krator (t c) 01:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is done. Nifboy 06:57, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

text: If "plot/character has never exactly been first and foremost in mind for the series", then why should it be first and foremost for the encyclopedia? I don't understand the need to place all this emphasis and do all this work trying to keep track of and piece together a timeline that the creators themselves did not work particularly hard on. Most of the sources in the article, official and otherwise, barely touched on Trevor's character, and so we should give him the same amount of due weight (which he has). Nifboy 04:05, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because there's a chance someone looking the character up might. But I suppose I'm not a minimalist when it comes to information. The more the merrier. KristenDArgyle 03:42, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You may want to move some of the article over to the Castlevania Wiki on Wikia; the rules on Wikia are a lot looser than that of a general encyclopedia. Nifboy 04:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the suggestion, but I find the Castlevania Wiki on Wikia to be just a little too loose. I mean, I've found information that is ridiculously (or incorrectly) interpretive. At least I try to cite sources. But hey, apparently I'm not helping anyway. KristenDArgyle 05:07, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You might want to check general gaming wikis like StrategyWiki, Encyclopedia Gamia, GamerWiki or GameInfo. --User:Krator (t c) 10:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random commentary
Wikipedia talk:Ribbons

message: Is it ok if this page has its own talk page? I find it a bit confusing to have a redirect here. for one thing, if the talk page is a redirect, then even the page itself does not show up in one's browser history. I hope that's okay. thanks!! --Sm8900 (talk) 20:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: @Sm8900 188.71.195.60 (talk) 04:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Item note
Talk:A Room with a Moose

message: "A topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works from sources that are reliable and independent of the subject itself and each other."
Show me. Ohemgee 01:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: While there is apparently a crusade to delete the articles for webcomics, this has its own page? 68.239.152.147 06:33, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WHY THE FUCK IS THIS A PAGE OF ITS OWN??

message: Wikified. I regretabbly forgot how the episode ended, however. Feel free to fix it. -JeebusSez 20:57, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: blah blah

message: Why is Dib so freaked out by a moose eating walnuts?
The above user does not understand the humor of invader zim Devilmaycare 07:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Um...
Talk:Videotape format war

message: Something is wrong with the Picture Quality paragraph:
> …its Beta I speed of 1.57 inches per second (ips) offered a higher horizontal resolution (approximately 250 lines vs 240 lines horizontal NTSC) … However, the introduction of Beta II speed … reduced Betamax's horizontal resolution to 250 lines.
I don't know what the right values are, but it can't have been reduced from 250 lines to 250 lines. Steveluscher (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

message: hi, 
In this article, Europe doesn't exist. We see the video format war from an American businessman's perspective.
I call this bad.
Neither video format is American. Nothing makes the United States role in the story predominant.
Or at least, nothing makes it normal that Europe is totally neglected.
Writing history from an American perspective is okay in an American school book.
Neglecting, even omitting Europe from that is not okay...
Writing history from an American perspective in a Wikipedia article, omitting Europe is something even worse...
Let this article be the first one to be improved to meet this standard.
(And if this standard doesn't even exist, let's establish it)
Peter 
--peter.josvai (talk) 13:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "En" shouldn't mean "American" in English language Wikipedia articles (en.wikipedia.org)
Talk:List of computer algebra systems/Old talk history

message: This article lacks encyclopedic context; why are these computer algebra systems important, and why are these aspects of them compared?  Mathematical capabilities seem much more important in the long run than price, yet they are barely mentioned. —donhalcon╤ 21:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As always, I slightly disagree with your context comment, but would welcome expansion of the initial paragraph.  Mathematical capabilities ARE important, but most tests for them would require original research, which is a no-no.  I recently added a "notes" column, which is partially intended to specify which class of problems the product is meant for (though most have nothing in this column, as they are "general purpose"). --Karnesky 21:27, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How are things like price and stable version not original research?  I'm pretty sure they're not published as articles in peer-reviewed journals or other credible non-commercial sources, which means they don't meet Wikipedia's citation policies.  (That's a pretty significant part of my objection to including prices and version data.)  —donhalcon╤ 21:48, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Peer-review on non-commercial isn't a criteria for whether a source is valid.  Quoting WP:NOR: "Original research that creates primary sources is not allowed. However, research that consists of collecting and organizing information from existing primary and/or secondary sources is, of course, strongly encouraged."  Price and version have reliable primary sources already in existance.  Sources for mathematical capabilities and performance often don't exist & when they do, they often have a biased POV. --Karnesky 23:37, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup needed

message: I changed the content of the Mac OS X, Linux and Unix columns for Maple from "?" to "Yes", since more recent versions of Maple support these (of course not every Linux distribution is directly supported, though) - this change is in accordance with this FAQ entry by Maplesoft. Aragorn2 21:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operating Systems
Talk:Economic history of Brazil

message: this is stupid 
Repaired vandalism; the first mention of the year 1985 in the section "Stagnation, inflation, and crisis, 1981-93" was changed to 2198 by 76.119.170.61. I happened to notice it and changed it back. I never do any edits but this was egregious. Sorry if I've violated any protocols. Oh yeah, and it looks like I should have marked it as a minor edit. YohoLungfish (talk) 14:58, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

message: I suggest moving the any important economic information from the period  1994 to 2002 to this page. 
Move FHC to brazilian economic history. 
Let Economy of Brazil deal with current issues, reform proposals, recent statistic and so on.
Herbert Alves 20:17, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 1994-2002 Period

message: Since nobody bothered to answer, I added the mentioned period from scraps of Economy of Brazil. Feel free to improve it, it has to be improved.
I hope the added period is seen as it is, as a early draft. 
Herbert Alves 04:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1994-2002 period added

message: In this page the following sentence is presented. "In the second half of the 1950s, the government enacted a series of special programs intended to better orient the industrialization process, to remove bottlenecks, and to promote vertical integration (see Glossary) in certain industries."
My question is: What Glossary? this reeks of poorly done copy pase, or at least of a displaced glossary...
:This article was mostly cut and pasted from a public domain source.  I should have removed the "see glossary" part when I adapted the original to Wikipedia format.  Thanks for catching that mistake.--Bkwillwm 01:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, taliking about fact-checking, the GDP growth rates for the Lula period given in the article are wrong. 187.34.76.81 (talk) 01:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Import-substitution industrialization, 1945-64

message: Whoever in the future decides to fact check this article, you may also want to check this realted article as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samba_effect. Happy editing. Vietminh (talk) 07:20, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: BTW, taliking about fact-checking, the GDP growth rates for the Lula period given in the article are wrong. 187.34.76.81 (talk) 01:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact checking
Talk:Tootle

message: I don't see a problem with the Tootle's moral. It represents following the rules and being a good child. Chaz 21:14, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moral 

message: I removed this section from the article:
:Many parents object to the message that little trains must "stay on the rails no matter what", considering it inflexible and authoritarian. They see the story as a tragedy in which Tootle, an individualist, is forced by the townspeople to leave his happy pasture and to return to his societally-approved role.
By lacking citations, it violates Wikipedia:No original research. By basing the claim on "Many parents", it violates Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words. If you want to put this paragraph back into the article, then please provide verifiable references to publications in which parents have objected. If, however, you simply want to raise the point that Tootle can be read as having anti-individualist messages, then post your own essay in your own blog. - Brian Kendig (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Many parents object..." 

message: I have rated this as a high importance article based on the sales claim from 2001.  It would be helpful if a more recent citation for its sales could be found.Barkeep49 (talk) 22:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: According to Wikipedia Land speed record for rail vehicles there isn't really a steam/coal powered train that routinely reaches the "two minute mile" as is claimed in this story, but a "two minute mile" must have been common known vernacular, so it seems like there must have been, is this just poetic license in the story or was a 2 mile a minute (120Mph) common?Mrrealtime (talk) 18:00, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speed
Talk:List of organists

message: Right now this page is organized as follows:
# Active/inactive
# Alphabetical
This seems, to me, to not be the most efficient way of organization that is possible.  How about, instead:
# Era
# Nationality
# Alphabetical
One large problem might be specifying a distinct nationality for every organist, but I suspect this might not be as large of a problem as one might think.  Otherwise, I think this method of organization should work better than others. —Sesquialtera II (talk) 21:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organization 

message: I see this discussion page has gotten a whole lot of use so far..
We need to establish notability requirements; I don't want to go through and put "citation needed" on every redlink, especially since some of the people are actually notable, but some of them are probably not.  This list has also become highly unwieldy and we should consider maybe making it into a table (possible columns: current church and/or current teaching position, birthyear, maybe "notes" allowing for other information). —Sesquialtera II (talk) 23:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Anyone considering adding an organist to this list should keep in mind the following from the Wikipedia:Lists (stand-alone lists) guideline:
"Ideally each entry on the list should have a Wikipedia article but this is not required if it is reasonable to expect an article could be forthcoming in the future."
To test the reasonableness of your expectations, you may want to create the article on the organist first and then add it to this list.  UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion criterion 

message: Wow, this is some fucked up layout. Can we please change it? --Avant-garde a clue-hexaChord2 02:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout
Talk:Loviatar (Forgotten Realms)

message: Actually, Louhi, the Hag of Pohjola, is unrelated to Loviatar in Finnish mythology.--Idran 21:18, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Louhi

message: Wouldn't it be more appropriate to move this article to Loviatar (Forgotten Realms) and to make this a disambiguation page?--Robbstrd 21:56, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I think it would be more appropriate to make Loviatar the page for the actual goddess and simply provide a disambiguation link to Loviatar (Forgotten Realms) at the top. Any objections to this? Sc00baSteve (talk) 04:29, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope. :) BOZ (talk) 14:09, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved this page to (Forgotten Realms), as suggested, and have requested an admin to move the (mythology) article to the main Loviatar article. Let's hope nobody was objecting but not saying anything. ;) --Muna (talk) 18:41, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: "Loviatar is a fictional evil goddess..." How can we know she's fictional? She might be real. This qualifier may just as well be added to all other Wikipedia pages about gods, including all the ones in which the world's established religions actually believe. Suggestions?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.66.152.189 (talk) 21:56, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's the expected standard for Wiki articles about fictional characters to beat-to-death the idea that they are indeed fictional characters and not real people. Some folks complain enough that these articles even exist in the first place, so might as well go with them on that much at least. 204.153.84.10 (talk) 22:14, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fictional?
Talk:Louhi

message: Louhi is actually unrelated to Loviatar.  Loviatar is the goddess of plagues, daughter of the King and Queen of the underworld, and though they have similar names, they are in fact distinct.--Idran 21:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

message: Perhaps the "Other meanings" section should be split into a separate disambiguation page, at least regarding the ships and Louhi network. The first sentence on Louhi as trance might be incorporated elsewhere into the article. MKFI (talk) 10:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split "Other meanings" into a disambiguation page? 
Talk:List of Christmas films

message: It seems like this movie list starts late and is missing some early films. For example, where is "Holiday Inn" from 1942? That is the movie which introduced the song "White Christmas" - while the whole film does not take place at Christmas, it's very much a Christmastime movie with multiple crucial scenes set at the December holidays.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.34.248.208 (talk) 17:41, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing movies 

message: This film from 2016 (seen in german tv today...) I didn't find here - could anyone add, please? Thanks --Kai.pedia (talk) 22:35, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christmas in homestead 

message: As I post this, the 1966 American-Italian film The Christmas That Almost Wasn't is not listed. Please mark this as "Done" when added. Thanks. 5Q5|✉ 12:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a reason why you can't add it yourself? DonIago (talk) 13:08, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Christmas That Almost Wasn't 

message: both OVA's take place during Christmastime (Wing EW begins during Christmas Eve and takes place over the span of an evening and 0080 takes place during the festive season), so if they count, do they go to the direct-to-video section? AranaeHere (talk) 01:16, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gundam Wing: Endless Waltz and Gundam 0080: War in the Pocket 

message: One film that is missing is the 1972 film (often considered one of the worse Christmas films) "Santa and the Ice Cream Bunny", I would add it but don't want to mess up the table! Wackytacky2 (talk) 19:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Santa and the Ice Cream Bunny
Talk:Big Block of Cheese Day

message: Am I mistaken, or is almost everything after the "Andrew Jackson" section irrelevant to the actual subject of this article? -Big Smooth 21:30, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I merged this to The Crackpots and These Women, the episode in which the day first appeared, per the Afd above. Xymmax (talk) 20:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger per Afd
Talk:Rhizophoraceae

message: Exactly where did you read that Rhizophoraceae are parasitic?  No species I know of the family Rhizophoraceae are parasitic, and the claim that many of them are is false.  Mangrove ecosystems tend to be monocultures, so there really isn't anything to be parasitic to. 
TheTakemasa 21:35, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Parasitic
Talk:Subway party

message: The term "subway party" has appeared in numerous peer-reviewed publications. It is not a neologism; the idea has simply gotten more attention as of late. Subway parties have been happening for as long as there have been subways, perhaps over a century. This article is certainly appropriate. Pyrotix 02:56, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I think that the name should be "subway party" and not "subway parties". Is there some reason for keeping the current name? Parudox 21:24, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: as somebody from the suburbs, far and away from all human vitality. I must say, i am jealous of this phenomena. Though admittedly i shall be moving to a major city ASAP. 69.231.202.228 03:22, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Totally kickass
Talk:Paul Winfield

message: He was a Simpsons *cast* member?  No. 64.122.95.110 21:36, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Simpsons?

message: Why is there no mention about his role in the Serpent and The Rainbow?  It was an awesome film and his role was significant in it.  I think he deserves recognition for that.
:We have an article about that film, The Serpent and the Rainbow. However it doens't seem like a significant project, nor has Winfield's performance received particualr notice (that I'm aware of). However, feel free to be bold and add it if you think it's important. -Will Beback 04:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Serpent and the Rainbow

message: Does the statement "He is interred at Forest Lawn Cemetery." refer to Winfield or his partner? WeeWillieWiki (talk) 02:27, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buried where? 

message: His damn grave says 1939, then why he listed as born in 1941?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.58.103.176 (talk) 05:08, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's equally possible the newspaper obits were "human error" – he wouldn't be the first celebrity to shave a couple of years off his true age. Primary sources like the California Birth Index might give us a clue, but we'd need to know what surname he was registered under. Is the identity of his birth father known?--Muzilon (talk) 12:58, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Just include them both if from WP:RSs. --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:24, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

text: Sorry for the late response.   Good work on the research.   I had no idea he was born in Dallas, Texas.  I wonder why those obituaries claimed he was born in 1941 in Los Angeles. Hitcher vs. Candyman (talk) 03:37, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Ehhh, the newspapers usually just repeat the "biography" provided by the celebrity's publicists... which may turn out to be wrong when primary sources come to light. See also Talk:Laura Branigan. Muzilon (talk) 07:45, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year 

message: Why hassn't his credit for being the narrator for City Confindential been added to the Television table? He did this til his death in 04 & was replaced by Keith David. AjHarris78  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.199.212.7 (talk) 07:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  City Confindential 

message: Can't we get a better headshot of him? I don't think this B&W profile image of him looking rather wide-eyed is a very good photo. Muzilon (talk) 00:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph
Talk:Constructive trust

message: This is an entirely incomplete definition and describes only two type of contructive trust (that arising in restitution or for wrongs), and not others such as remedial constructive trusts, and cases in which the terminology of contstructive trust is used to describe associational trusteeship. Needs extensive expansion and rewrite Alex Bartho 21:42, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Very True, it does have some good points, but its focus is too much on Commonwealth Law, US Common Law and from their Schizoid states like California and Louisiana would be helpful to show the varying degree of contructive trusts.
:It is a bit eerie actually; this article reads just like the lecture note handouts for that portion of the restitution course on the BCL at Oxford.  I may have missed my guess, but I'd bet good money that is where the first draft of this article came from. Legis 16:09, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Constructive Trust 

message: This article needs to explain that the approach is different in different jurisdictions.  Currently it misleads as to the role of Constructive Trusts in England, where they are not used as a remedy for unjust enrichment. DavidCBrannan (talk) 13:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The courts often do treat a constructive trust as a trust (contrary to the lead). There is sufficient confusion in England that I'd not know where to begin, I shudder at the thought of trying to deal with all common law jurisdictions. Is  the article right for somewhere? Not here - you don't get to be a constructive trustee of stolen property (that would be daft since you aren't the legal owner how can you be a trustee of it)? Weird. 82.68.102.190 (talk) 14:34, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Jurisdictions

message: The second sentence of the introduction looks doubtful to me. I was taught that constructive trust is actually a trust - at least that is the position in England and Hong Kong. Even if US law does not regard constructive trust as a true trust, it should not appear in the introduction as this is supposed to be an article for all jurisductions. I suggest retaining only the part that reads, "the trustee's sole duty is to transfer the title and possession to the beneficiary."Craddocktm (talk) 16:27, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction