lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Drilling and blasting

message: I propose that Rock Blasting be merged into Drilling and Blasting. I think that the content in the Rock Blasting article can easily be explained in the context of Drilling and Blasting, and the Drilling and Blasting article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Rock Blasting will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Zath42 (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: That was the only name I heard, so I see no way to search for it.  It would be several rock drills mounted on a truck chassis.  Each drill would be on a arm.  The one I saw on TV had 3 arms, but only 2 drills.  So I was trying to figure out what the 3rd arm was for.  Most jumbo drills appear to be used as part of underground drill and blast operations.--Will 05:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there an article on Jumbo drills? 

message: Drilling and Blasting is more commonly known as Drill and Blast in the industry so I was wondering whether the title of the page should be changed to Drill and Blast rather than Drilling and Blasting. --Splash6 08:38, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That must be a geographical thing, working for a Drilling and Blasting company, as far as we are concerned "in the industry" its known as Drilling and Blasting, and not Drill and Blast.  Zath42 (talk) 04:15, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drilling and Blasting or Drill and Blast? 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Blast hole. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 21#Blast hole until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 23:34, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Blast hole" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:United 93

message: I'm finding the following redirects and disambig pages confusing and illogical:
*United 93 (disambiguation)
*Flight 93 -- another disambiguation page, similar but not identical to United 93 (disambiguation)
*United 93 -- redirects to United Airlines Flight 93
*Flight 93 (film) -- redirects to Flight 93 (TV film)
I would suggest that the two disambiguation pages be merged, and the other two pages mentioned redirect to the merged disambiguation page. --Mathew5000 19:53, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I completely agree with you on this subject.
 The Beatles Fan (talk) 13:59, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agreement
Talk:Totentanz (Liszt)

message: I did some cleanup (5 August 2006) removing weasel words, and adding a source (Alan Walker).  If more cleanup needs to be done, please let me know.  Rolf-Peter Wille 05:35, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

message: I see no references about the music. Most of the information is about the theme of death.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deafussy (talk • contribs) 16:38, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the work itself? 

message: This contained a link to De Profundis, which in turn redirected to Psalm 130. 
In disambiguating De Profundis in order to accomodate Oscar Wilde's work of the same name, I discovered this link. I have therefore changed the link to De Profundis in order to retain the existing link chain. But I have to say I don't really understand the sense of the link, and I'm concerned this may actually have been a mislink to start with. Perhaps somebody who knows more about classical music than I could take a look. -- Starbois (talk) 13:13, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extant versions link to De Profundis 

message: Yes, Dies Irae means, literally, "Day of Wrath" (as it is commonly translated); but it refers to Judgment Day. The wrath in question in divine wrath. The Day of Judgment is what the poem (and the Gregorian chant) is about. The words "Dies irae" are simply the opening words of the poem: an incipit.
—
NicholasNotabene (talk) 11:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Dies Irae = Day of anger 

message: Here is the lead sentence of this section:
"In the Romantic age, due to a fascination with everything Medieval, the aspect of fantastic or grotesquely macabre irony often replaced the original moral intent."
May I suggest that, imho, this sentence is gibberish, falling apart when one parses it? What irony? "The original moral intent" of what? And exactly how, in any case, is "irony" replacing "moral intent"  something that is "due to a fascination with everything Medieval"?
—
NicholasNotabene (talk) 11:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  re "Sources of Inspiration" 

message: Quote: "The opening [of the Totentanz] comes surprisingly close to the introduction in Bartók’s Sonata for Two Pianos and Percussion, a work composed almost a hundred years later. This may be no coincidence since Bartók frequently performed Liszt’s Totentanz."
This statement places the proverbial cart before the horse. No, Liszt's music does not come "surprisingly close" to Bartok; it is rather the Hungarian composer-pianist Bartok who may echo, or use, the Hungarian composer-pianist Liszt. This may tell us something about Bartok, but it says nothing about Liszt and his Totentanz.
—NicholasNotabene (talk) 12:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re "Stylistic innovations"
Talk:Denial of the virgin birth of Jesus

message: The main problem with the article in this state is the content, sourcing and focus. The title is something of a second issue. The term "psilanthropism" is not uncommon, it was a thing in the days of Coleridge, though not as common in books as simple "Denial of the virgin birth" not to count variants such as "Denied/deny the virgin birth". What's more of an issue is that, going by the more reliable sources, it is something of subset of the larger set of ideas in Christian history which have denied the virgin birth. Therefore I have WP:MOVEd the page Psilanthropism to Denial of the virgin birth of Jesus, per "WP:COMMONNAME and broader scope of article", but of the two is the broadening of the scope of article which is the main issue. Also to discuss the Unification Church and not mention mainstream Christian groups is very odd. A re-titling will hopefully attract more editors and better content and sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:35, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:COMMONNAME

message: Of Virgin birth of Jesus? —PaleoNeonate – 09:34, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree with a merge.  Obviously the other article should include both support and denial. PopSci (talk) 15:47, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV fork
Talk:Socinianism

message: How does Socinianism differ from Psilanthropism? Should the two articles be merged? 24.126.199.129 05:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What's the difference

message: You probably won't ever buy it, but to call a unitarian belief "antitrinitarian" comes across as POV. To me it would be like starting the Christianity article by saying it is a form of Judaism (there have been several which state the Messiah has come, but I have no idea what a word for the collection of such groups of Jews is). Unitarians believe god is one, trinitarians three.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.108.196.9 (talk) 20:47, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: More: only two links, and both of them anti-socinian! Not NPOV for certain! As for belonging to "Christianity" we should ask themselves - trinitarians don't generally accept anti-trinitarian views as belonging to "Christianity", but that is a matter of terminology. ... said: Rursus (bork²) 08:17, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? 

message: It would be good to distinguish between necessary jargon, which can be briefly defined in the body of the article, and unnecessary jargon which just makes the article unreadable.
Johncmullen1960 (talk) 06:25, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: jargon

message: How are Socinian and Socinianism pronounced?  Is the c hard, like a k or does it sound ts like in Sozzini, or socksinian, like in succeed or soft s or ch? Apuldram (talk) 14:08, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's pronounced with a "s" sound, I believe.Don Bodo (talk) 14:54, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Trek/mainpage/tasks

message: The "William Riker" page is in need of a new picture. The one there has him in the grey and black uniform, which is not how he looked for the majority of his star trek career. It's just a real pain in the ass to find another picture on the internet that is of good quality and that follows all their copyright rules
Mnpeter 14:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riker 

message: Most of the episode summaries for Star Trek: The Next Generation contain extremely long plot summaries followed by "trivia" sections that include both "making-of" trivia and "goofs." These plot summaries need to be shortened and the trivia sections need to be better incorporated into the main body of the article. Also, goofs do not belong in Wikipedia; they belong in IMDb. This is especially true for supposed in-universe goofs (i.e. inconsistencies between episodes). Unless these goofs have been published somewhere, they are all original research. --Hnsampat 17:06, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.  This is pretty much the case for episode articles from the all the series.  Morwen - Talk 17:09, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Trek: TNG episode summaries 

message: I hope this is the right place to put this. I've noticed a lot of the Enterprise episodes are all sorts of weird. No infoboxes, or ones with no proceeding or following episode boxes at the end or so on.
One of the biggest examples is 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Borderland_(Enterprise_episode)
Lots42 01:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Friendly Heads Up 

message: Star Trek: Legacy is an article that I think should be reworked entirely.  NPOV seems to be a problem in the article, as does a poorly written "plot summary".  Several have already complained on the article's talk page, and I think this article should be added to the WikiProject: Star Trek task list.  I own the game, and plan to do some work on the article soon, also.</br>
--FastLizard4 (Talk|Contribs) 04:38, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Star Trek: Legacy]] 

message: On the Dutch wikipedia, there's an article about: Star Trek: Dark Armada link. It's a fan-based movie project, and it seems to be still very active, so why not porting this page to here? (I'm willing to do it, if needed.) --DanielPharos (talk) 10:56, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Star Trek: Dark Armada 

message: At least 4 users have tried to add information from the new movie about Riverside, Iowa to that page. User Nyttend keeps removing it saying the movie is too new to be canon. Also claims ST4 made Kirk's birthplace in Iowa canon which is not correct. Wants decision from Star Trek wikiproject. See history for that page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.44.15 (talk) 23:35, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed this from the To-Do list; please discuss at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Trek if necessary. -- Aatrek / TALK 14:31, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riverside, Iowa
Template talk:England squad 1998 FIFA World Cup

message: Hello! Can you revert back to the established template colours. I see that the same user has done disruptive editing. Can you revert back the template to the Cameroonian template as well. Can you block the user fully and don't allow that person to edit in the distant future.
Yours sincerely, Sondre --88.89.14.227 (talk) 14:02, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template colours
Talk:Eglinton West line

message: This article seems to discuss the same proposed subway line in Toronto as the referenced article Eglinton Subway Line, and the this article seems to better comply with wikification. WVhybrid 01:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the other page is quite accurate. The Eglington West subway is based on a TTC report (RTES PDF Document), and the other page doesn't seem to have any sources. Either way, thats just my opinion. Hmm, it was only made this year... --Yllianos 02:27, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge page 

message: Just curious was the line really gonna be grey?
:I don't really know and I don't really think so; I just made it grey for no apprent reason. Just, when I think of the airport I think grey. whee~ --Yllianos 18:03, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Colour of Map

message: It really upsets me to read about the mayors getting together to plan this line then big bad Harris comes in and puts the kibosh on it. Dare I dream what TO, specifically Eglinton, would be like  today if the project had continued. 174.6.44.36 (talk) 21:21, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Mike Harris
Talk:Mildred Burke

message: Does anyone know how many children Mildred had. I found a source that states that she had two children, Joseph and Violet (who died in a match). Can someone help with this?(MgTurtle (talk) 22:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children 

message: In the article, the original title of the section that dealt with Burke's NWA dealings was entitled "Old Boys Network." That was not a neutral point of view, as the phrase contains a bias against the power the NWA "boys" had. I chnaged the subtitle to a more neutral "Dealings With The NWA" Paul Kondor Poduszlo (talk) 06:25, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change of section title 
Talk:A Collection: Greatest Hits...and More

message: I found :Image:A Collection Greatest Hits.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:A Collection Greatest Hits.jpg]]

message: :Image:A Collection Greatest Hits.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:A Collection Greatest Hits.jpg
Talk:20 Golden Greats (Buddy Holly & The Crickets album)

message: Thanks for uploading :Image:20 Golden Greats.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then  can be used to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags/Non-free. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Non-free content) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:37, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:20 Golden Greats.jpg]]
Talk:The Katzenjammer Kids

message: If there is a third kid... What is his name? What was distinctive aboot him in regards to the other three? Why he was left behind? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.48.226.60 (talk • contribs) 
I first started reading the Katzenjammer Kids over 70 years ago. One of my all time favorite comics. Yes there was a 'third kid'. His name was "Rollo", a city cousin of Hans and Fritz. He was always a bit more dressed up than the twins. His main purpose in life was to cause trouble for the kids and anyone else who happened to be near. Rollo's pranks usually backfired on him. I did not know until recently that he is not listed in the characters portrayed. I have no idea why he might have been dropped. Hope this helps.
K & j admirer (talk) 22:08, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember Rollo. Wasn't he a cousin, who came to visit them at times, and as said, he was as bad as they were? I remember a girl of the same age too.(80.31.144.16 (talk) 15:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Third kid

message: As I recall, the family (or Der Captain, at least) was from Heligoland. He was always saying "Back to Heligoland, Lena!" This is kindof odd, since Heligoland is a German island in the North Sea that was--at least when the strip was created--a vestigial posession of Great Britain! Yet nothing is ever made of this oddity (that I can recall)
68.8.166.178 16:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the UK transferred Heligoland to Germany in 1890, seven years before the strip began. --Metropolitan90 06:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heligoland? 

message: Why is the Piracy template on this page (at the bottom). I'd remove it myself but maybe I'm missing something? Herostratus (talk) 01:11, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Piracy template? 

message: The strip appeared titled "The Bunsey Boys", a one page picture story in the comic section of The Magnet, #'s 233-243, 245, 246 (1912). The boys were called Georgie and Ferdy. (80.31.144.16 (talk) 15:32, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Magnet

message: Do any sources identify The Katzenjammer Kids in Love as the first sequel in film history? 50.66.121.20 (talk) 05:47, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: First sequel?
Talk:Binary splitting

message: The revision  with comment
:(fast multiplication does not move the bulk of the computation into the domain of multiplication; the binary splitting algorithm does, fast multiplication ensures that this is an advantage)
changed the text of the article from
:The advantage of binary splitting comes from moving the bulk of the computation into the domain of multiplication using fast algorithms like Schönhage-Strassen.
to
:The advantage of binary splitting comes from moving the bulk of the computation into the domain of multiplication and using fast algorithms like Schönhage-Strassen.
I think that this wording is awkward and expresses the idea less accurately than the older version.  I admit that it is possible that the comment has relevance, though.  Are there any suggestions for dealing with these issues? If there's no feedback I'm likelu to revert. CRGreathouse (talk | contribs) 06:29, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision

message: I deleted the wrong statements: 
"Binary splitting is used by the fastest existing software for computing mathematical constants such as π and e to high accuracy. It can be used more generally to evaluate many common special functions of arbitrary arguments; however, it is mainly useful when the argument is a small rational number.
". 
The "Binary Splitting" method for computing mathematical constants such as π and e to accuracy of N digits has the complexity bound   ~ N^2 -- it's easy to calculate it according to formulas presented at the "Binary Splitting"- Wiki page. The fastest existing software for computing mathematical constants such as π and e to high accuracy based on the Fast E-functions Evaluation Method (the FEE, 1990) and has the complexity bound ~ N^{1+\epsilon}. 
See 
http://math.nist.gov/mcsd/Reports/2001/nesf/node35.html
http://math.nist.gov/mcsd/Reports/2001/nesf/
http://math.nist.gov/stssf/
the method is called "Kar'91" there.
See also
http://www.ccas.ru/personal/karatsuba/algen.htm
http://www.ccas.ru/personal/karatsuba/faqen.htm
the method is called the FEE there.
--147.231.6.9 (talk) 13:20, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Statements
Talk:Winston Grennan

message: The references given show his year of birth as 1944 and the obituary in the NYT dated 2000 refers to him as 56 years old. If you have references for any other date please give them. --Egghead06 (talk) 17:15, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth 

message: The information on Winstons website is incorrect. I possess official documents with my fathers correct age.Pokibaby1 (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia doesn't work like that. Whats needed is a reliable source for information which can be verified by readers. There is one such showing 1944 and an obit from the NYT showing him as 56 in 2000. --Egghead06 (talk) 04:34, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Winston Grennan 