lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pinus elliottii

message: Dade County Pine was used extensively in construction in Florida. Where it remains it is prized for it's strength, durability and termite resistance. The article should include this information. MrBill3 (talk) 20:00, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in construction 

message: This seems to be disputed. Some claim that it comes from the original settlers habit of "slash"ing the tree trunk in order to obtain the sap which was used for turpentine and rosin.  See https://swflrelocationguide.com/things-to-do/attractions/native-landscapes/ and https://crewtrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/CMT-Guided-Walk.pdf AndrewColeman2010 (talk) 00:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The first of those websites does not look like it qualifies as a reliable source. I'm a little leary of the second site being reliable for the etymology of the name. The first citation in the article after the etymology is given is to an off-line book, so I can't check what it says. I did find a site supporting the etymology given in the article, https://www.cabi.org/isc/datasheet/41600, which has an impressive list of references at the bottom of the page. CABI itself seems like a reliable source, but I really would like to find where they got the information from. I have to allow for the possibility they got it from WP. I would really like to see what older (pre-WP) reliable sources have to say. - Donald Albury 02:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the name "slash pine"

message: — Assignment last updated by Krg0302 (talk) 21:39, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Disease Ecology 6200
Talk:Pinus pumila

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Siberian Dwarf.   140.147.236.194 (talk) 20:31, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus 

message: The ip added similar walls of text to two other articles. See discussion at Talk:Rhodiola_rosea#Recent_edit. --Ronz (talk) 17:38, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from article for possible expansion
Talk:Pinus virginiana

message: I have a hard time believing that the conservation status of this tree is "Near Threatened". Where does that come from? If you live in the Southern Appalachians or Piedmont, you'll know that they grow like weeds. I could be wrong, but it seems like they're about as threatened as crabgrass.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wncoutdoors (talk • contribs) 
:I agree. Some city guy at IUCN screwed up with this one...I advise people to kill these trees when they have them in their yards...it's a weed.⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 00:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This strictly applies to the State of New York only, who have placed it on a near endangered list..please see the USDA listing. It is extremely plentiful in the rest of its native range. NY had a small area in its range once but it has been depleted. Their classification for that state is misleading.⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 01:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Gernandt, David S., et al. "Phylogeny and classification of Pinus." Taxon 54.1 (2005): 29-42.
Cumming, Jonathan R., and Charlene N. Kelly. "Pinus virginiana invasion influences soils and arbuscular mycorrhizae of a serpentine grassland 1." The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 134.1 (2007): 63-73.
Eckert, Andrew J., and Benjamin D. Hall. "Phylogeny, historical biogeography, and patterns of diversification for Pinus (Pinaceae): phylogenetic tests of fossil-based hypotheses." Molecular phylogenetics and evolution 40.1 (2006): 166-182.
López, Gretel Geada, Koichi Kamiya, and Ko Harada. "Phylogenetic relationships of Diploxylon pines (subgenus Pinus) based on plastid sequence data." International Journal of Plant Sciences 163.5 (2002): 737-747.
Iverson, Louis R., Anantha Prasad, and Mark W. Schwartz. "Modeling potential future individual tree-species distributions in the eastern United States under a climate change scenario: a case study with Pinus virginiana." Ecological Modelling 115.1 (1999): 77-93.
Toole, Vivian K., et al. "Responses of seeds of Pinus virginiana to light." Plant physiology 36.3 (1961): 285.
Howden, Henry F., and George B. Vogt. "Insect communities of standing dead pine (Pinus virginiana Mill.)." Annals of the Entomological Society of America 44.4 (1951): 581-595.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.41.5.39 (talk) 15:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New References to Use
Talk:Pinus densiflora

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Japanese Red.    140.147.236.194 (talk) 15:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus 

message: In Europe we have tree species that are widespread across the continent, but are named after small part of their area: 
*Scots (scottish) pine
*Norway maple
*Norway spruce
*English oak
The tree Norway pine does not even grow in Europe. But, in Korea they don't accept the name Japanese pine?--Berig (talk) 10:54, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting
Talk:Pinus bhutanica

message: I just edited the way this shows up in the category "Pinus."  It had been set up to alphabetize there under the common name, "Bhutan White Pine."  But this didn't make sense since it showed on the list with the binomial (scientific) name.  So I changed it to realphabetize it that way.  But I added the Redirect page to the Category.  So now, the common name does show.   140.147.236.194 (talk) 15:29, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited for categories
Talk:Pinus fenzeliana

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Hainan White.   140.147.236.194 (talk) 13:06, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus 

message: This is photo of Pinus wangii not P. fenzeliana, and was renamed on commons. What is the rationale for keeping it here? Nova (talk) 19:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo in infobox
Talk:Pinus clausa

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Sand.    140.147.236.194 (talk) 19:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus
Talk:Boyoubetterunow

message: The article Limited Edition (The Concretes EP) has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:no mention of notability, no references,limeted edition of 500 copies, fails WP:N and WP:V
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist.  The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:28, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Limited Edition (The Concretes EP)]]

message: The article Lipstick Edition has been proposed for deletion  because of the following concern:
:No mention of notability, no references,limited edition of 1,000 copies, fails WP:N and WP:V
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist.  The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 16:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[Lipstick Edition]]
Talk:Pinus leiophylla

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the Category Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Chihuahua.   71.126.140.136 (talk) 02:12, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited to improve sort order in Category Pinus
Talk:The Game of the Century (Go)

message: This page is incomprehensible to non-go players.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.153.133.15 (talk) 03:01, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have rewritten most of the page, avoiding jargon where possible. Is the current version better? HermanHiddema (talk) 11:38, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:The Social Liberals

message: This entry is a canard. There is no such party in Austria, and it has definately never gotten a seat in any federal election. The entry should be removed altogether.
Hannes S. Auer, M.A., Vienna / Austria
Well, maybe you should check out their homepage?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.47.36.94 (talk) 11:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Pinus brutia

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Turkish.   71.126.140.136 (talk) 11:39, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in Category Pinus 

message: I recently made some changes to help clean up the article and while there's still some more I plan on doing, I want to know if this is relying on one source too much. Frankis 1999 is the most recent description of the species I could find, and its what makes up a good deal of the backbone of the conifers.org and other sources; the other sources they cite didn't seem to be comprehensive descriptions of the species. Zucchinibyday (talk) 13:00, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relies on one source too much?
Talk:Abies alba

message: shouldn't the title name be the english one, in stead of the scientific?Mweites (talk) 09:26, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 

message: Abies means "fir tree" in Latin, plain and simple. I have no idea why anybody would say that it means "rising one"; but whatever the reason, it is utterly wrong. And albus means white, or (when contrasted with candidus), dull or matt white; certainly not "dead" white. On the contrary, the connotations of albus are always positive. The entire section on Etymology is a shame. Imerologul Valah (talk) 22:59, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Pinus cembra

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Swiss.   140.147.236.194 (talk) 20:40, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus 
Talk:Bridging the Distance

message: The track listing needs to be numerical, otherwise it is of limited use. Kouban (talk) 20:31, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listing 
Talk:Pinus sibirica

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Siberian.   140.147.236.194 (talk) 20:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus 

message: The ip added similar walls of text to two other articles. See discussion at Talk:Rhodiola_rosea#Recent_edit. --Ronz (talk) 17:38, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved from article for possible expansion

message: Right now in this article there is only a photograph of the pine cone of this tree, which is only one detail of the organism. I'd appreciate if there was another picture, for example, this one by Maksim Teltsov: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Chemalsky_District,_Altai_Republic,_Russia_-_panoramio_%2858%29.jpg . It shows two trees together in a natural habitat. I'm not familiar with image add/remove edits so I'll only write a suggestion here, for now. Thanks. 37.33.27.207 (talk) 11:25, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another / Better Image?
Talk:Pinus koraiensis

message: http://navercast.naver.com/contents.nhn?contents_id=1477
The link above leads me to believe that leaves on Korean Pines generally come in bundles of two, not five. Can someone confirm this?  
Unbal3 (talk) 07:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you can trust me. I live near a botanic garden and the Korean pines there have 5 needles per bundle. You can simply tell it from the fact that the species is in subsection Strobus. ILoveAllTrees (talk) 19:58, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of Leaves per Bundle 

message: http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/media/press/2010/WWFPresitem17536.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.231.182.113 (talk) 07:05, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  important for Tigers 

message: I just edited the way this shows up in the category "Pinus."  It had been set up to alphabetize there under the common name, "Korean Pine."  But this didn't make sense since it showed on the list with the binomial (scientific) name.  So I changed it to realphabetize it that way.  But I added the Redirect page to the Category.  So now, the common name does show.   140.147.236.194 (talk) 16:06, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited for categories
Talk:Picea omorika

message: The last time i checked, this plant was not Serbian, but just Paničićeva omorika. It grows in Bosnia and Herzegovina too, not just in Serbia, so, it should just me called Pančić spruce. 77.77.246.128 (talk) 21:51, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Picea omorika young female cone - Keila.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for April 19, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-04-19. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 14:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Pinus heldreichii

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the Category Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Bosnian.   71.126.140.136 (talk) 02:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited to improve sort order in Category Pinus 
Talk:Pinus pinaster

message: gbhi  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.178.39.30 (talk) 10:44, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Maritime.   140.147.236.194 (talk) 16:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in Category Pinus 

message: The distribution map for the species is incredibly detailed, but there is no key to explain what these symbols mean. The image is from Caudullo et al. 2017, you can find that here. It appears that the distribution map on this page was improperly edited and cropped the key from the picture. Green is the native range, X are isolated populations, triangles indicate introduced and naturalized populations. The key should be added to the image or there should be text explaining the symbol meaning, otherwise it is very confusing to readers Anonkiwi (talk) 22:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Improvements
Talk:Pinus merkusii

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Sumatran.   140.147.236.194 (talk) 20:38, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus 
Talk:Pinus tabuliformis

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Chinese.   71.126.140.136 (talk) 10:24, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in Category Pinus 
Talk:Pseudolarix amabilis

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 17:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Pseudolarix →  – Given that the genus is not monotypic, this article should be moved to the species title Pseudolarix amabilis, with a genus article left at Pseudolarix noting both the living species and the extinct Pseudolarix wehrii from the early Eocene of Western North America (Klondike Mountain Formation Allenby Formation), and late Eocene of Axel Heiberg Island. Kevmin § 15:45, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

text: *I have already started a species article in my draft space for Pseudolarix wehrii  & .--Kevmin § 17:15, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

text: *As an additional note, there is at least one more fossil species, Pseudolarix japonica, from Miocene to Pliocene deposits in Korea and Japan.--Kevmin § 21:21, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to ''Pseudolarix amabilis'' 

message: Just a quick note for  & , Pseudolarix wehrii is now live.--Kevmin § 13:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: ''[[Pseudolarix wehrii]]'' live
Talk:Pinus cembroides

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Mexican.    140.147.236.194 (talk) 17:37, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus 
Talk:Pinus orizabensis

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Orizaba.    140.147.236.194 (talk) 17:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus
Talk:Pinus johannis

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Johann's.    140.147.236.194 (talk) 17:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in category Pinus 

message: I propose to move the name of this article to Pinus johannis, and a redirect placed here at the current name. This is per WP:FLORA#Scientific versus common names.  Any objections? --Tom Hulse (talk) 22:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move
Talk:Heifer

message: A Young Cow Before She Has Had Her First Calf. 
The web master dictionary defines a heifer as a cow that has not yet had a calf, this is incorrect.  A heifer is a cow that has had 0 or 1 calf.  Typically a cow is only considered a cow until she has had her 2nd calf.  This is largely to do with credibility of the cow, by saying "she is a cow" you are saying that this animals has proven rearing capability.  As a farmer it is more risky to buy animals that have not calved as most problems are in delivering and rearing the first calf.  After she has had her second calf then she would be considered a reliable breeder and worthy of being called a cow.
This is certainly the case where I farm in Somerset UK.   I am not sure how this is in other parts.
twopir (talk) 18:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There are regional differences in usage.  In some places, a female Bos primigenius is a heifer until she gives birth to her first calf, at which point she becomes a cow.  In others, this transition happens when her second child emerges.  But maybe there's an overlap in some circles.  I don't know. — Smjg (talk) 15:26, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition 

message: I removed the picture as it was supposedly a picture of a steer according to the description not a heifer as the page describes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by StevenNZ (talk • contribs) 11:03, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Keep in mind that this is an english language encyclopedia and spanish definitions may not apply. Daniel.Cardenas (talk) 20:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed picture
Talk:Pinus roxburghii

message: The 19:21, 30 August 2009 Imc version of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to enforce an existing stab.--Wing (talk) 16:19, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation into Chinese Wikipedia 

message: I edited this to change the sort order on the page for the :Category:Pinus.  It had been set to alphabetize under Pine.  That might make sense for categories where there are a lot of trees and a few of them are pines; then all the pines group together.  But on the page where everything is a pine, it made more sense to alphabetize under Chir.  71.126.140.136 (talk) 10:26, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit to improve sort order in Category Pinus