lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:We Got to Do Better

message: I've assessed this article for WP:TV as requested here. I have rated this article as start class because the relatively short length and lack of important sections like critical response, production etc. and as low importance because there is little to distinguish it from other articles about television series. Check out WP:LEAD for advice on writing the lead of an article - the current lead includes a lot of info that is not included in the main body of the article. It could be improved by transposing the material into the main body and leaving a summary in the lead.
These categories are arbritrary and are subject to review by any editor who feels confident to do so. Please note that a more formal assessment by other editors is required to achieve good article or featured article status. I used criteria from the television wikiproject guidelines here, article about TV series guidelines here and the assessment guidelines here.--Opark 77 13:51, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article assessment
Talk:Fish slice (kitchen utensil)

message: Going to be bold and merge this. My rationale is thus:
* Vague topic: Basically, this is a type of fish cake. Or is it literally a SLICE of fish cake? 
* Inadequate sourcing: The solitary source is just about a restaurant closing in HK, and the Gtranslate doesn't even translate any of it to "fish slice"
* Should already be merged: The hat note on the top says "for English fish cake go to fish cake" but actually that page discusses Chinese/Asian style fishcakes better than this. 
* No one can accuse me of trying to eliminate Chinese cuisine subjects because I love eating fish cakes, and any editor can check my efforts on improving the Fish ball article. Better food articles for better foodies! Estheim (talk) 04:26, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging into [[Fish cake]] 
Talk:Fox Valley Conference

message: I'm wondering if the note for McHenry is still necessary now that their two campuses both serve the entire district and aren't divided by region.  Looking at the pages for other athletic conferences that have schools which have a freshman or underclassman campus, no others that I found had a note like this.  Examples would include Central Suburban League not mentioning New Trier's Freshman Campus, or DuPage Valley Conference not mentioning Neuqua Valley's Freshman Campus. Is it worth considering removing now that it's more apparent that McHenry wouldn't have two athletic programs?  --WeezleBeezle (talk) 15:38, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  McHenry
Talk:Immagine in Cornice

message: Can someone explain why this DVD is supposedly 153 minutes?  
92 min 32 sec, main movie
9 min 1 sec, a quick one while he's away
4 min 14 sec, throw your arms around me
5 min 30 sec, ledbetter
total time: 111 min, 17 sec
wikipedia reports 153 min.. so are there 41 min 43 sec of easter eggs?!
18:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  153 minutes?! 
Talk:Ogden Park

message: File:Ogden Park blacksmith.jpg|Workers in Ogden Park in the blacksmith shop
File:Ogden Park 2.jpg|Workers in Ogden Park with their horse teams
I don't know if these photos from the 1860s relate to the article's Ogden Park. Wouterhagens (talk) 18:50, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos
Talk:Illinois State Museum

message: Although the article has a paragraph on repatriation of Australian material, there is no mention of NAGPRA and repatriation issues and activities concerning Amerindians.  See, e.g., America’s biggest museums fail to return Native American human remains (inquirer.com) and Q&A: Heather Miller, Illinois State Museum Director of Tribal Relations | Sovereignty (nativenewsonline.net). Kdammers (talk) 18:29, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repatriation in U.S.
Talk:Swansea, Illinois

message: I drive through this village often but I am not sure how to pronounce it. I probably would get a quicker answer asking somebody around here. I figured SWAN-see but there is a Swansea in Wales pronounced SWAN-zee. Proper names often have irregular pronunciations.70.225.32.236 (talk) 00:26, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronounced SWAN-zee or SWAN-see?
Talk:My Big Fat Greek Life

message: Why is it Ian in the text and Thomas in the cast list? Someone is fucking around with the names in this article... -- Imladros (talk) 14:35, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  People names 

message: There was a lengthy paragraph, largely OR, which detailed differences between the film and the TV series (OR in the sense, at least, that, with only seven episodes, it's a bit of a stretch to assert this or that character is "missing"--how do you know they would not have been mentioned or appeared later?).  I'm not sure there is a source that supports the lead's opening statement that it's a direct continuation of the film (given characters' names were changed, that seems inherently contradictory), but I've moved the name changes from that 'differences' section to the lead so it's not so strange to someone moving from the film article to this one.  Personally I'm inclined to think Life should be treated as a distinct project in its own right (especially now that the sequel to Wedding is out, with the original names restored along with cast, and presumably without reference to this aborted series) unless sources say otherwise, but that's more work than I have time for.  Maybe someone else can look into this. ZarhanFastfire (talk) 19:15, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Names redux, and other stuff
Talk:State Bank of India Officers' Association

message: Note:  Project Banner with Chandigarh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Chandigarh or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Chandigarh workgroup Addition 

message: Support the January proposal to merge State Bank of India Officers Association (Chennai Circle) for reasons of both short text and context. Klbrain (talk) 15:09, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 14:43, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Daddy & Papa

message: I know this article is very thin, but it's late here and I just wanted to be the first to get the ball rolling on this film.  I ran across it en route to something else, and can't believe no one's ever done a wikiarticle on it (I searched).  Maybe with what's here, somebody else can elaborate into a good article; I may get back to it, but film reviews aren't usually my thing.  :-)  --Textorus 06:44, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: it's nice to be first
Talk:Bologna Centrale railway station

message: Hello! There are some mistakes in this article. The tower with the clock has been disrupted in 1926 ad the "marble pillars" were built later. For more historical details and images see the italian article linked. There one can see also the map of Ratti (1871) where is clearly designed the shape of the traveller building. (sorry, I can't directly contribute because my basic english). Vale! User Horatius on it.wiki
I agree that the article needs a major rewrite.  I will have a go at doing that some time in the near future. Bahnfrend (talk) 04:31, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistakes

message: The New Bologna Centrale Station article was outdated and contained much of the same information as this one, so I have merged material from that article into this one. The talk page will be redirected as well. Leschnei (talk) 18:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material added from New Bologna Centrale Station article
Template talk:Sports portals browsebar

message: I like the idea, but I'm not sure about the seemingly arbitrary choice of sports. - Dudesleeper ·  Talk 06:57, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The original idea was to list every sport+game with a maintained portal. --B (talk) 22:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That should remain the idea. If other stuff is in there, it should be removed immediately, since this is a navbar to sports portals. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 06:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sports selections

message: I have reverted the bold edit of the removal of the Canadian portal link that has been here for years. Not sure the logic in deleted a related portal? Is there a problem with the portal? As seen above the template is for all related sport portals. The reason given thus far is its not an individual sport..but nor are a few others like the Olympic etc. -- Moxy (talk) 02:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Its only been here for years because you have reverted other attempts to remove it without a rationale.  Sports in Canada is out of scope and confusing in the template's current form.  Games and Olympics and Paralympics should be removed for the same reason.  Perhaps its preferred use could be explained in the template documentation: ie "This is a list of sports-related portals".   Moondyne (talk) 04:04, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to be more clear here as you seem to be saying they are not sport related. They are main overview portals about sports - in the case of the Olympic portals they are of major significance to a wide  range of  our readers. May be best to ask for some outside help here because thus far the reason  for removal is that they are not sports related - when in fact to me it looks like they are main overview sports portals. As for the ONE revert of the same edit 2 years ago - the reason for the edit was "(remove "canadian sports", as this browsebar cannot possibly include all and every country in addition to all sports)" ...it was reverted because there are no other country sports portal. Do we hide the Canadian portal  because  other countries  dont have one yet? Should we  orphan from the template 3 or 4 of  the main sports portals? Why not provided navigational help to  all sports portals?  -- Moxy (talk) 05:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: My point was "sports-related" as opposed to the more general "sport-related".  A subtle but different meaning.  I hope that's clearer. Moondyne (talk) 07:41, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That is... but why be so specific  if it only effects a few links especially if  those articles cover a huge amount of sports related articles? I could understand if there were so many that they could be split..but spiting off just 3 or 4 is not all that helpfully to our readers. -- Moxy (talk) 07:54, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, documentation page updated. I'm happy with that. Moondyne (talk) 02:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canadian sports portal
Talk:Odile Crick

message: I have classified this article as a stub due to its level of detail and organisation. Capitalistroadster 07:00, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub classification

message: Can we see her famous helix drawing?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk  20:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: ...her two daughters Gabrielle and Jacqueline (1954–2011)
:If the girls died in the same year, was it just coincidence?
Valetude (talk) 23:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daughters' deaths
Talk:All-Asian Intervarsity Debating Championships

message: "A rival tournament, the Asian Universities Debating Championship, was established in 2005 by institutions who were unhappy about aspects of the organisation of the All-Asian Intervarsity Debating Championships (most particularly the selection of the adjudication core, and generally the principles outlined in the constitution). Since then, many universities in Asia with strong debating traditions – most notably universities from the Philippines and Singapore, including many of the institutions who won the All-Asian championships up to 2004 – have chosen not to participate in the All-Asian Intervarsity Championships and have instead entered teams in the Asian Universities Debating Championship.
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, which was one of the founding institutions of AUDC and entered teams in the rival tournament in 2005 and 2006, chose to attend the All-Asians Championship in 2007. Among the universities that won the All-Asians prior to the split, they are the only institution to have participated in the All-Asians since the inception of the rival tournament. They will return to the AUDC in IIU in 2008."
Someone keeps deleting the second paragraph. I see no reason why it should be excluded, since the information is true anyway. 124.106.233.124 07:03, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The section on Controversy currently reads 
Talk:PJ Katie's Farm

message: I wrote Nelvana sometime back asking if they'd ever release it on DVD, but got no answer. It had limited (but dedicated!)
appreciation back then, and would probably have just as limited an appreciation if it was released now. That being said, I thought (and still think) it was one of the best shows ever done. I hate it when people dismiss it as "uhhh she was high..." - and compare her with (of all people) PJ PHIL (??? could they BE any more opposite???) - It wasn't that she seemed HIGH, duh, she was *childlike* in the best way possible, and had an on-air personality that really captivated kids BECAUSE of that. The Farm seemed like a really loosely outlined show which she brilliantly improvised her way through - to the benefit of the show! That's what elevated it above more patronizing shows like Lambchop's Playalong or uh...those Lois Walker abominations haha. i don't recall there being ANY obvious cue-card reading, or ANY obvious stop-editing. There were no ads in those kids` timeslots back then, so it was essentially a 15min uninterrupted performance. i always assumed it was somewhere around 70-80% improvised maybe with a loose plot outline and a few time-cues to keep her on track. She and the entire crew (all the directors/producers/writers/props people were her friends) obviously had a riot making it, and it showed. what i loved about her work (Farm & Treehouse & subsequent CGKids episodes on APTN) was that she got genuinely *excited* about everything, and there was never the slightest bit of patronizing or condescension in how she addressed the camera - she was like a kid herself, so she never talked DOWN to kids, unlike a lot of the other PJ's. I ended up doing my BEd and trained to teach Elementary school, largely *because* of her influence and really owe her a world of thanks for the quality of the work she's done for kids. Anyone can do a kids' show, but SO FEW PEOPLE can do it well. I REALLY hope Nelvana releases The Farm on DVD, or at least makes it available somehow for download, because there's enormous teacher-training value (and probably improv acting educational value) in it, above and beyond the pure awesomeness of the show! -V.I.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.20.1 (talk) 03:21, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was watching it in the late 90s, so it was being shown later than that. One of the weirdest TV shows ever made... I wish they'd release a DVD. Mark Grant (talk) 03:54, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Aurora University

message: It might be nice if somebody created a notable alumni section like many other schools have.Bdavid1111 (talk) 22:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni? 

message: I noticed there is a banner about this section relying on one single source, but there are three separate sources listed. Can that be removed? UC1500 (talk) 19:28, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Championships
Talk:Lombard College

message: Portions of the History section are identical to portions of this history page.  A rewrite is needed. -- Bistropha (talk) 23:17, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your concern. However, based on my review it appears that the external site most likely copied the content from Wikipedia, rather than the other way around. Facts pointing to this conclusion include that the hosting site on which the page you cite was posted was created in 2007, while the Wikipedia text was written in 2005; that the external page is composed almost entirely of material taken from elsewhere; and the contribution history of the Wikipedian (or perhaps she would prefer for me to say then-Wikipedian) who created the article. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:52, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs rewrite to avoid copyvio 

message: Information to expand this article is available on several pages of the website of Knox College. --Bistropha (talk) 08:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional resources
Talk:Trinity Christian College

message: Is he still there?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.186.82.249 (talk) 04:41, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Hanna 

message: ??? Peter Horn User talk 19:35, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: or , another good reason to use . Peter Horn User talk 19:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverse conversion
Talk:Strategic Air Command in the United Kingdom

message: The map of air bases is very inaccurate.  Almost all of the base locations are wrong, by a distance on the map that's at least three or four times the size of the marker squares.
* Bruntingthorpe is too far north, and should be somewhere around where Chelveston is shown.
* Chelveston should be south-east of Bruntingthorpe, probably somewhere around the "d" of "RAF Mildenhall".
* Fairford is shown as being ENE of Brize Norton; it is actually SW of Brize Norton and its true location is somewhere around the "r" of "Upper" in "RAF Upper Heyford".  Brize Norton is shown too far north and way too far west.
* Greenham Common is too far north and should be somewhere around the last "m" of its label.
* Marham is too far east and should be about where the tops of the two l's of "Mildenhall" are.
* Mildenhall is much too far west and should be about where Lakenheath is shown; Lakenheath is only a couple of kilometers away from Mildenhall, to the north-east.
* St Eval is actually about half-way between the marked location and Land's End.
* Scampton is actually about where the "R" of "RAF Waddington" is, only about 10km north of Waddington.
Dricherby (talk) 14:38, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I have redrawn the map. Could you have another look and see if everything is in the correct place?  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 21:50, 11 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's a big improvement -- thanks! However, Marham and Lakenheath are in completely the wrong place (as I said, Lakenheath is only a couple of km from Mildenhall). Waddington is due south of Scampton, not south-east. St Eval has disappeared. Dricherby (talk) 00:28, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

text: Thanks! I had Lakenheath's longitude as west instead of east, and there was a typo on  RAF Waddington's. I left St Eval out because it is neither mentioned in the article nor in my sources as a station used by SAC.  Hawkeye7 (discuss) 01:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate map
Talk:Praetorian prefecture of Africa

message: As a new overarching article called Byzantine North Africa now exists, I suggest merging of the articles Praetorian prefecture of Africa and Exarchate of Africa into that new article, along migrating any information. Antisyntagmatarchos (talk) 19:44, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose; at 102k, Byzantine North Africa is too large to accommodate 2 merges from pages that are more than stubs; WP:TOOBIG. Klbrain (talk) 23:10, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging of articles
Talk:1977 FA Cup final

message: Greenhoff 'titted' the winning goal!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.58.247 (talk) 02:07, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:University of Illinois Chicago College of Dentistry

message: As rightful owner of branded contact about University of Illinois at Chicago College of Dentistry, I am kindly asking that a Wiki admin PLEASE delete this page. It is causing Google to display wrong information (Clark Stanford is our Dean, not Bruce Graham.). We would prefer to not have a wiki page for our college. 
Thank you.
Cbeveluic (talk) 17:31, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Batmobile (Batman Begins)

message: Again, just like Batmobile (Batman Forever) this should be merged with Batmobile, into a new section. -- Anonymous DissidentTalk 07:23, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: 1/5 or 1/3? Text contains both. John.n-IRL 00:40, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scale Model

message: I've replaced the image in the info box with one I've taken myself. I think the new image serves the article better as it is of one of the actual cars, not of a theme park replica, and shows the vehicle in full light with closed doors. Jedd the Jedi (talk) 07:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image replacement
Talk:Aermacchi

message: THERE IS SOMETHING SERIOUSLY WRONG HERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SIAI-Marchetti re-directs to this article and there is not a single mention of this prolific aircraft manufacturer or its products!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Petebutt (talk) 19:40, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, it's not a big enough problem to be all that obnoxious over. The SHOUTING and !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! make you seem like an over-exited 15 year-old fanboy. Is that what you want people to think? - BilCat (talk) 20:07, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

text: From reading Gunston's World Encyclopedia of Aircraft Manufacturers, 2nd Edition, It looks like SIAI-Marchetti was sold to Agusta in 1989, with the trainer designs being transfered to Aermacchi in 1992. Anyway, the best solution is for someone to write an aricle on SIAI-Marchetti, as it is without a doubt a notable company. I'm changing the redirect to Savoia-Marchetti, its immediate predecessor company, for the time being. - BilCat (talk) 20:35, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: SIAI-Marchetti

message: I have expanded the motorcycle section, however there is a lot more information I could provide on the racing history.  Perhaps combine it into a table, didn't want to pad out this article too much as its a general company overview.  Does this section need its own page? RicardoDonovan (talk) 22:24, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No, IMO, but other editors may disagree. --86.29.222.228 (talk) 23:15, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motorcycles
Talk:Giant Barn Swing

message: corrected minor spelling mistake
124.183.206.223 07:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is nothing that stands out about this attraction, it's just a regular Screamin' Swing LuxembourgBoy42 (talk) 03:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we delete this page
Talk:Mani stick-fighting

message: This article looks to be a stub of the article El Juego De Mani, I suggest combining them.  --P.4.P. No. 1 (talk) 17:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct, but this was never pursued because merge proposals have to be made at the talk page of the merge-to (not merge-from stub) or they usually don't get noticed.  I've raised the discussion there and tagged both articles for merging, and started merging them.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  12:04, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Category talk:European national and official selection-teams not affiliated to FIFA

message: Isn't the correct preposition to use before FIFA "with"? That's the convention used in the US, so I'm not sure using the construction "affiliated to" is common in Europe or not.--Prisencolinensinainciusol (talk) 03:07, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I would definitely use 'to' in this context. Not sure of the exact rule, but my thinking is that FIFA is the parent organisation and the associations are the subsidiaries, so the smaller organisation affilates to the larger. If it was two organisations of equal standing, I would say 'with' is more appropriate.Crowsus (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preposition