Talk:Mike Dean (referee)

message: Mike Dean will referee the 2007 FA Cup FinalStatto74 11:32, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be nice if you had posted a hyperlink showing where you got that nugget of information. Refsworldlee(chew-fat)(eds) 23:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No response from you on this. Well, I've done a search on the internet (not just Google), and this "fact" doesn't appear anywhere, like you'd think it would. I call this speculation, and a pretty safe bet too (seeing as how he was taken off of last year's). I'd love to know how you know this to be true. Refsworldlee(chew-fat)(eds) 23:26, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Gee, you were wrong - Steve Bennett got the appointment in actual fact. Refsworldlee(chew-fat)(eds) 13:44, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: yesterday this referee is very bad 194.113.40.41 (talk) 08:57, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BVB vs Sevilla 

message: where shall I start. 'harshly sent off' = npov, whether it's cited or not! numerous selective citations and references supporting Chelsea's view against a single card, selective reference to only a Chelsea appeal. 'being scored marginally after the declared added time had been played at the end of the first half' = weasel words. further, a single game in an article on the whole referee's career - and a not especially important one at the time, played in september - does not warrant a paragraph nearly as long as the ref's background.
wikipedia is a neutral source of facts. it is not for selective citation based bashing of a particular referee for fans of one team for a single match. this is an article on the refereee Mike Dean, not an opinion piece on his performance in any game. 
i am very much aware that this game was contentious, and 'could' have changed the outcome of the league, but it is clearly opinion masked through selective citations in a game that for all other clubs in the football league was meaningless. if every ref had a paragraph like this in their article, each of their pages would be never ending gripes on games long past. this article should be a neutral, factual background piece about the ref, summing his whole - many game - career.
if you are able to point out exactly why this should be a special case, exactly why it is notable, and make a neutral, well balanced, short piece, and include all other similar incidents in the entire career of mike, and keep the page within wikipedia's length guidance, then by all means go for it!
(i've also added this to the talk page of the article, you are welcome to respond there)81.96.251.179 (talk) 21:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: Hi,
i think after alot of his awful displays and controversy it should be noted 
82.2.183.208 (talk) 14:46, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. Cannolis (talk) 14:53, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 September 2015 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Mike Dean (referee). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080115195943/http://www.football-league.premiumtv.co.uk/page/RefereeProfilesDetail/0%2C%2C10794~628215%2C00.html to http://www.football-league.premiumtv.co.uk/page/RefereeProfilesDetail/0%2C%2C10794~628215%2C00.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110211225301/http://www.football-league.co.uk/carlingcup/news/20110131/officials-named-for-carling-cup-final_2293330_2281129 to http://www.football-league.co.uk/carlingcup/news/20110131/officials-named-for-carling-cup-final_2293330_2281129
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:06, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mike Dean (referee). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061123142534/http://www.newcastle-online.com/refereewatch/mikedean_referee.shtml to http://www.newcastle-online.com/refereewatch/mikedean_referee.shtml
*Added  tag to http://www.refworld.com/referee/9/0/mike-dean
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:20, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: He isn’t really liked in the football community. 109.154.189.233 (talk) 00:33, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Volteer1 (talk) 00:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 March 2021