Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 10

message: It has come to my attention that, given the amazing amount of speculation here, I should just go ahead and give out a forum for those people who want to speculate.
 (Look under "Super Smash Bros. Brawl")
If this already has been discussed, sue me. I'll plead guilty.
-Joseph Staleknight, Wiki Novice —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.179.109.201 (talk) 01:13, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we really want to flood SmashBoards with speculators, Joseph?--the ninth bright shiner talk 17:14, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Absolutely, because SmashBoards welcomes speculators in its specific thread categories like "Brawl Character Discussion". I should know because I'm logged into there. Erik Jensen (Appreciate|Laugh At) 19:03, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that certainly puts it differently! So, should this message be a template at the top of this page?--the ninth bright shiner talk 19:49, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Dunno, I know I suggested that sometime in the distant past, but HighwayCello thought not to do that because that probably wouldn't work. I do suggest changing the appearance of the template containing the link to the FAQ page, however, because right now it's easy to skip over and there's a lot of questions posted on here that have been posted many times beforehand and would be answered by looking at the FAQ. Change the color of the box, the thickness of the borders, the layout and boldness of the text... any of these will work to make the FAQ more noticeable. Erik Jensen (Appreciate|Laugh At) 19:54, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I started work on the template as soon as I saw the message, but Erik beat me to it. Still, I think this final product with concepts from both our templates looks more eye-catching. I would have increased the size of the "HALT!", but I don't know how to do that. --LuigiManiac 20:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, all you need is a handy  tag. I'll leave the word-enlarging to your personal tastes.--the ninth bright shiner talk 22:51, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added more messages.  'Tis funny and more eye catching. --80.6.146.72 19:35, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I liked the additions, except disembark. Remember, we're not a boat. Wait, that didn't sound right... --LuigiManiac 13:49, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, Anubiz, I'm sure there's plenty of other forum sites like SmashBoards.--the ninth bright shiner talk 03:23, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I've added the big tag to the "HALT!". It looks even more eye-catching now, in my opinion. --LuigiManiac 00:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that looks a lot better, thanks, It was hard to notice that before. Minirogue 01:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smashboards 

message: Why cant we put down nintendo as the developer? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.64.65.29 (talk) 15:34, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because they're not? -Sukecchi 16:26, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The developer is not Nintendo, it's...well, somebody else. It's unknown if HAL Labs is working on it, or Sora. All we know is that Sakurai is the developer.--the ninth bright shiner talk 17:17, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Developer 

message: It is official that the powerful moves in SSBB are called "brawl moves", yet 6 months later, this thread still refers to them as super smash moves.  This usage is irritating and incorrect.  Someone should change it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.239.155.119 (talk) 18:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What is your source for this information? Minirogue 18:56, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brawl Moves 

message: We need to find another reliable source for the game's Euro release date, as Nintendo Europe now says TBD instead of 2007. Anyone got any ideas? And don't say IGN, because they have it down for September 30, which is a Sunday. Cipher (Talk to the hand) 18:20, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no reliable source for the release date anywhere as far as I know. Minirogue 19:33, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

text: What's wrong with Sunday? Pokemon Diamond and Pearl came out on a Sunday, unless people in Europe do things differently. But that's beside the point, what I'm trying to say is that saying its on a Sunday is not a good way to debunk it. I'm sure there are many more valid reasons its not a good source than that.Mavrickindigo 23:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well US releases are generally on Tuesdays and Japanese releases are usually on Sundays. European releases are generally on Fridays and chances are, SSBB will be released on high release days. There is still no confirmed release date though. Period. InsaneZeroG 01:16, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euro Release Date 

message: So, It has been said (not confirmed) that Sakurai is recruiting a expierienced game making people creating a team called the team.Is this true? if it is,than who are theese recruties that have been aproached. If it is false, than a good chunk of this article has a date with the DELETE button (but only the fake stuff.)
WE NEED SOURCES!!!!!!!!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.64.61.169 (talk) 02:39, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As this fellow says, we need a source. A reliable place that says he's making "The Team."--the ninth bright shiner talk 21:40, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Correct. The official site itself states it in a page titled "How this game came to be" or something. Sakurai has not revealed the name of this team, but it's definitely not HAL, since he said it was newly formed. - Zero1328 Talk? 06:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The team! ooooooohhhhh.......(nuts) 

message: oh educated and esteemed wikipedians, any word on the release date shown here? http://www.gametrailers.com/gamepage.php?id=2686
is it yet more speculation and conjecture? estimation and creation? 59.101.108.116 03:31, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  release date 

message: i hate to suggest this myself because i've seen hundreds of people being shot down on this talk page.  if this info has already been mentioned/proven fake, please don't be too mean, i tried my very best to research it properly and to a wikipedia standard.
i found this, in which iwata says brawl is set to be released between the end of summer and fall.
there's also this, in which kojima himself has played brawl and makes a few comments, especially on its level of completion.
i can't believe nobody has suggested these links here before, they're certainly exciting for fanboys.  so i apologise if they're old news. Djchallis 10:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason they're shot down is because they keep looking at the same piece of old info. That Wind Waker Link, Kid Bowser, etc thingy. This on the other hand, is quite new. It's less than a week old, actually. I forgot about it, though. Thanks for bringing it up. - Zero1328 Talk? 11:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...What is that supposed to be? I don't know about the Summer/Fall release...but the Kojima part is quite true. -Sukecchi 12:06, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

text: This is true. It is in a article at ign I just read.(Im just sorry you posted it before me.)76.64.62.50 14:01, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Quarter 4. October, November, and December.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 15:19, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its a rough area to get into since the "end of summer" could just be a week or so before Q4 or he might mean all of September. Q4 covers most of fall. Q4 should probably just be replaced with "fall". Yes, no? FMF|contact 18:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

text: it was an official representative, it was iwata himself. the only issue is that he was quite vague.Djchallis 09:17, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The Same argument could be used against you. I don't see why it couldn't simply be left as Q4 2007, or Q4 07 to take less space. What region wasn't stated though, so I think it should just be left as 2007 as well. Takuthehedgehog 17:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  confirmed new info 

message: ...why does the article refer to Samus as a "he"? 75.38.112.227
::Probably some vandalism that went by unchecked. Just fix it. -Sukecchi 00:44, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is currently semi-protected, so IPs can't edit it. I've fixed it. — MalcolmUse the schwartz! 00:46, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Samus Gender? 

message: I found out it's being rated T for Teen. .Cans omeone add it in? I also found some box art. Temporary though. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Irkenkeyblade (talk • contribs) 01:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Care to link to said boxart? -Sukecchi 02:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And the source for the rating? The Dojo's opening English page still lists it as Rating Pending. --Sparky Lurkdragon 02:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Anubiz, disliking a rating is stupid. Furthermore, if SSBM was re-released now, it would get an E-10+ rating. SSBB will mostlikely get E-10, though T is also possible. As for the box art, it was mostlikely a fanmade one, or a temporary boxart made by a gamesite. None of it is official, though, not even the ratings. We need to wait for an official boxart (and official boxart is not necessarily the final boxart) to determine what rating the game will be. (Dang, realized I wasn't logged in--this is actually 'Ultima' [UltimaHedgie] speaking.) --68.74.202.213 18:00, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: new info

message: Look at this: http://ranobe.com/up/src/up189355.jpg
Even though a Tingle cartoon is only on the left, this can't be an advertisement for another game because DK and Kirby are in it. The first picture also seems to be a player using the Wii Remote to make their character attack. 208.101.136.230 15:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The handdrawn pictures of TIngle and the kid using the wiimote to make Link slash. What does it say by those?Tuesday42 13:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

text: I was asking the anon who said he knew Japanese.Tuesday42 20:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, he already said they weren't serious about Tingle and that the Wii stuff was speculation(that part I already assumed.) Should have noticed that before i asked for a translation at the reference desk. >_<Tuesday42 20:20, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Uhm, why are we even arguing over this? Isn't the rule Verified Consensus? Just leave it out period until...blah blah blah see earlyer posts. Quatreryukami 02:19, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tingle is likely to make some sort of appearance... And Wii controls are somewhat revealed? 

message: Who put that date up? was it vandlisom? Anubiz 02:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relase date?