lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fish River (Namibia)

message: Fish River is also a name used for the Lachlan River in New South Wales, Australia, before the explorers determined that the two rivers were the same river. It was also the name of a small village on this river, which is now called Reid's flat.
Yewenyi 09:19, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Clinical psychology

message: The final paragraph of this section is misleading and should be removed.  Clinical psychologists not only diagnose, but are *required* to diagnose in order to treat their patients.  It is, in fact, considered unethical for a clinical psychologist to treat a patient without first assigning a diagnosis which is to be treated.  For this reason, this information is incorrect.  In addition, distinguishing between a diagnosis and a formulation is a false dichotomy, as the clinical formulations that are provided by psychologists include a diagnosis.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSukis (talk • contribs) 02:04, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagnostic Impressions Section Misleading 

message: I noticed that the transpersonal psychology section was not that big, at least when compared to other psychological methods. I was thinking of adding that "transpersonal psychology also focuses on understanding the brain as it goes through shifts in consciousness that are related to transcendence" transcendence being different for each individual of course. Source: Hartelius, G., Krippner, S., & Thouin-Savard, M. I. (2017). Transpersonal and Psychology: An Experiment in Inclusivity and Rigor. The International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 36(1), iii+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A584329702/AONE?u=birm97026&sid=bookmark-AONE&xid=82ef0da5
I just wanted to go through the talk page before I actually edited.
Thank you
Pammul  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pammul (talk • contribs) 03:20, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transpersonal Psychology Section
Talk:Dumb (Nirvana song)

message: The following is unsourced information:
*Though never released as a single, "Dumb" was picked up by many alternative rock radio stations and became a modest radio hit.
*Like some other In Utero songs, "Dumb" was extensively bootlegged long before the album was released; when Cobain played its opening chords during Nirvana's set at the Reading Festival in August 1992, a large part of the audience started to sing along, prompting Nirvana bassist Krist Novoselic to joke, "Power of the bootleg, Kurt!"  
*A brief live clip of "Dumb," recorded on November 10, 1993 in Springfield, Massachusetts, appears on the vinyl version of the band's 1996 live compilation album, From the Muddy Banks of the Wishkah. It features Cobain accidentally repeating the song's second verse instead of going into the bridge, then stopping to apologize to the audience.
While this is interesting, we can't use it unless you provide a source. Also, none of this is really trivia, as trivia by its definition is "unimportant information" - it therefore shouldn't be in a trivia section but instead the information should be incorporated into the main article. - Tbsdy lives (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 11:47, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: I have re-written the article from scratch and all of the information is sourced. The song is significant in the history of Nirvana, perhaps more so than a number of other articles for songs by the band, such as "I Hate Myself and Want to Die", "Sappy" and "Negative Creep".QuintusPetillius (talk) 16:12, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article re-write

message: As per guidelines on Wikipedia:Record charts: in the article prose, some charts representing the home country of the artist or composer (this can mean country of origin, country of residence, official nationality or any country where the artist or composer has lived for a substantial part of their lives) or releases with a strong link to the country in question can be included if no other suitable charts can be located.QuintusPetillius (talk) 19:21, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Single Vendor (network) charts
Talk:Origin, Nature and History of Aegean civilization

message: This page had a "cleanup" label and an "attention" label applied to it,  21:04, 20 Jan 2005 by a User:-Ril- who had not contributed to this article. Irresponsible labelling like this may seem like a cute joke, but it prevents fastidious Wikipedians from employing these labels at all. I am removing them. --Wetman 09:44, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Refugee law

message: http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/04/28/refugee-050428.html
Sam Spade  23:40, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Important news

message: I suggest that we expand upon this section. Particularly, we should include more information about the US and Europe. Patience456 (talk) 18:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources of Refugee Law 

message: Hello there! I have been taking a look at this article and am considering working to expand it as a part one of my university classes (the course page is viewable on my user page). I am thinking of expanding some of the broader sections, citing sources, and eliminating superflous content as well as expanding some of the less developed regional sections. If anyone has any thoughts or advice on how to edit this article moving forward I would greatly appreciate them!
Arcendeight (talk) 05:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion Plans

message: It seems more logical to put the definition of a refugee before the section about sources of refugee law. Additionally, we should add more sections about refugee laws in places other than the US. 
Liz.go (talk) 00:57, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section Order and Content
Talk:Smitten (The Martinis album)

message: Should this be moved to Smitten (album)?  The Marla Sokoloff article states that she plays in a band called Smitten, which currently links here.  I am changing the link in that article to point to Smitten (band).  I think this should be moved to Smitten (album) and Smitten should be a disambig. Kurt Weber 05:04, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed it. You should really have been bold in updating though. Robinoke 14:12, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smitten (album)
Talk:Kuntilanak

message: Pontianak has no fangs.
True Potatowatermelon (talk) 16:09, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  pontianak 

message: The pontiyanak is a woman who died before giving birth while the tiyanak is an unborn child whose mother died before giving birth. I just thought there might be an interesting link between the two. My references on Philippine mythology does not show any link between the two. Maybe on your mythology, you could find such a relationship. --Lenticel (talk) 05:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Tiyanak]] connection 

message: I wonder if we could get an image of a Pontianak, i would try but I don't want to break the copyright laws. Phthinosuchusisanancestor (talk) 10:30, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: This article isn't correct. The Pontianak isn't a woman that died in child birth. A Pontianak is a child that died in childbirth. A vampire that was a woman that died in child birth was called the Langsuyar or the Penanggal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.6.131.130 (talk) 03:16, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong Title 

message: Something ain't right here.
Initially it is said that the pontionak is the spirit of a woman who died during pregnancy while the lang suir is the spirit of a  woman who died during Labour. So far so good.
Then under the section 'Lang Suir' is says that the pontianak is the ghost of a CHILD who died during birth and the Lang Suir a ghost of a woman who died together with her CHILD during labour.
So, which one is it?
21-1-2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.159.134.243 (talk) 10:53, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Completely vague 

message: Is this entity a ghost or rather a corporeal revenant? Several aspects point to it being corporeal - e.g. a nail can be stuck into it and it is capable of inflicting bodily harm with its hands.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ciaraleone (talk • contribs) 18:29, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ghost or corporeal? 
Talk:Christ the Redeemer

message: Note: most of this talk was moved to Talk:Christ the Redeemer (statue) along with the move of Christ the Redeemer to Christ the Redeemer (statue). Therefore, the redirect has been removed. \sim Lenoxus " * " 16:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nguyen

message: 阮- how is this pronounced in its Chinese form?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Chinoiserie (talk • contribs) 
: Yun in Cantonese and Ruan in Mandarin and. --Menchi 05:00, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  &#38446; 

message: I suggest the removal of most of the text in these section. The history of the name has never been properly researched; there are only assumptions with few to no evidences.
--KomradeRice (talk) 15:41, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin and usage; Changes of family name
Talk:York Vision

message: Anyone know why the york vision website is so out of date? It's not been updated this accademic year by the looks of things... -- Tomhab 11:56, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website out of date 

message: Much of what was removed from the article in that revert does appear to be truew if my memory serves me corrctly, however, I do think the way it was written was not suitable. Also, even some of the bits which were true probably don't need to be incldued. Can someone with a better memory than me varify that the 'Lecturer: my child porn shame' stuff and the media awards stuff is all true? I know the paper won the Guardian aweard thing for at least 3 years in a row and there was at least one lecturer arrested over child pornography which I read about in the paper. Evil Eye 17:04, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The last revert to the article on 29th July 

message: As per WP:COI I note that I have undone the revisions throughout March referring to 'controversy'. Whilst factually accurate, it was very poorly written. Further, I note I am the author of the article which was referred to, and the person who did the research that the article was based off. I also believe the author themselves had a COI, as they identified themselves to me, but naturally will not identify them. 
Maragil (talk) 15:26, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undoing of revisions
Talk:Árpád dynasty

message: , would you refer to scholars who challenge Bertényi's words about the symbolism of the double cross on Béla III's coins? Thank you. Borsoka (talk) 17:34, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double cross 

message: Anon, please read WP:NOR before adding content to this article. Borsoka (talk) 06:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: and  please read and apply our policy about sourcing because self published websites are not reliable sources. Please also read our policy about sockpuppetry. Borsoka (talk) 04:45, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research
Talk:London, Chatham and Dover Railway

message: NB I wasn't logged in for the rewrite!
I have rewritten the article to include the following:
* the position of the EKR in the story of the LCDR
* full dates for openings etc; and dividing different sections from each other 
* places amended to railway station - it IS an article about the railway after all!!
* details of the line (eg tunnels)
Also:
*In some cases the line opening were slightly incorrect, eg the Sheppey line went to Sheerness - the later opening of the station at the latter replaced the original terminus; similarly some lines were open before stations along it were (Dulwich is an example).
*I have also cut out the later dates beyond 1899, since the LCDR was then no longer a separate entity: it ceased as such in 1899. The article is specifically LCDR.
82.34.120.131 12:22, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Teenager of the Year (album)

message: This page links a number of songs directly to their subject matter: For example, Big Red.  This is poor wiki practice, since the user will be surprised when they end up on the "terraforming" page after clicking on a song title.  Instead, I would suggest that you describe the song, something like this:
: 17. Big Red (2.41)
: Refers to the process of terraforming Mars.
I don't know enough of the background info on the songs to do so.  thanks!  bikeable (talk) 23:38, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've followed your advice for a couple of them. Robinoke 00:08, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Meckel's diverticulum

message: Under "Presentation" the article states: 'Meckel's diverticulum is located in the distal ileum, usually within about 60-100 cm of the ileocecal valve.'  I suspect centimetres is not the correct unit of measurement here, unless we are discussing a lifeform the size of a small country.  Not being a medical person, I don't know what is correct.  Milimetres? Billy Tallent (talk) 18:40, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Centimeters is correct.   The reference is to length, a small bowel being roughly 6-7 meters long, a meckel's presents about 60cm away from the valve. Fuzbaby (talk) 20:42, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  problem in article with location/measurement 

message: Further reference can be drawn from the following resources:
* 
* 
* 
Contents may be updated suitably by some interested editor.DiptanshuTalk 11:10, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further resources 

message: In Nelson's Textbook of Pediatrics it is stated that Meckel's is more common in females. Here - the opposite. Any thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.144.59.207 (talk • contribs) 10:33, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Male/female?
Talk:Sofia Polgar

message: The informal explanation of how to pronounce this name needs to be replaced by a pronunciation guide using the IPA Halidecyphon 15:13, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: old talk

message: The quote from Korchnoi at the end seems pointless and sexist.  However active Korchnoi is today, he is also 80 years old.  Meanwhile, Ms. Polgar is no longer playing tournament chess at all.  It's not like it was any great rivalry, so why?  --96.233.92.199 (talk) 14:17, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sexist quote?
Talk:Ljuboten

message: Please write true information about this mountain peak. 
Someone wrote: "Mount Ljuboten is located in the south part of Kosovo, near the border with Macedonia." 
Since Kosovo is integral part of Serbia and Montenegro, it is more accepted to be: "... located at the border between Republic of Macedonia and Serbia and Montenegro (in the part with Kosovo).".
I think that everybody can agreed with that. --DeeJay 11:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ljuboten's location 

message: Someone with the IP address 80.80.170.122 at May 27th 2008 wrote this about Ljuboten:
"The name of this mountains is a remain of french language that mean 'The beatufile mountain' (La bella Ten)".
Can anyone confirm that this is true?
Also, can you provide more information related to the name of mountain peak Ljuboten? 
Thank you! 
--DeeJay (talk) 13:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to be some sort of folk etymology; "the beautiful mountain" would be "la belle montagne" in French. This theory has been added before (you can look through the history), with different versions of the "French" each time. It seems more likely that it gets its name from a Macedonian, Serbian or Albanian word anyway, but I don't know about that. BalkanFever 07:18, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

text: Thanks for the answer, BalkanFever. --DeeJay (talk) 21:08, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Name Of Ljuboten 
Talk:Demographics of Cuba

message: Since most readers have no idea what "natural change" refers to and many have only the vaguest concept of "fertility rate", it would greatly benefit this article if those two graphs in the article were accompanied by more than the complete absence of any explanation that the article currently contains. 2601:200:C000:1A0:ED24:FC42:967D:7208 (talk) 17:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural change? Fertility rate?
Talk:Northrop YB-35

message: I've also seen this plane designated B2T - what is this code and what why was it used? (Mmartins 15:22, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: B2T was the designation reserved by the US Navy  for this aircraft. As far as I'm aware, it was never actually used. --Rlandmann 06:29, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Designation

message: Is that correct? 
With 3 gunners, that's about 7 apiece.  If it had remote control turrets like a B29, maybe.  It just seems odd. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Deathbunny (talk • contribs) 03:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  20 .50's? 

message: While I don't generally go for conspiracy theory's the facts I garnered from the old timers are:
-Jack Northrop really only cared about developing new ideas.  The underwriters of the companies that carried his name realized this and wrote into the contract that he didn't get to make business decisions. There are so many development projects that Jack started that went nowhere beyond testing.
-All the technical problems were solvable. 
-All prototypes were scrapped, even though Northrop try to buy some back for further testing (Jack wanting to play more).
The aerospace industry is known for nasty politics, and Northrop only became a loved builder after buying Grumman.
Saltysailor (talk) 04:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  conspiracy 

message: Dispute/Discuss notation: According to information clearly stated in the authoritative Pape & Campbell volume Nothrop Flying Wings, and again in the O'Leary article noted in Air Classics (both listed in the references section), the T37 Turbodyne patents and technical data were, indeed, transferred to General Electric after the engine's devolpment program was cancelled by the Air Force. The Pape & Campbell volume is considered the definitive reference on Northrop Flying Wings. I have read this exact same info (about the T37 Turbodyne) in older Flying Wing references in my extensive Flying Wing collection. --Ken Keller (Wikipedian SolarWind1)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.94.164.114 (talk) 10:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: EB-35
Talk:HIV testing

message: This article is intended to explain in simple terms the current state of the art of HIV testing, what it is and why it is done.
It is distinct from HIV blood screening as different issues are involved.
This article is not intended to discuss technical details of specific tests, which is currently done at HIV test an article listed for peer review, whichis out of date and needs extensive editing
This article could be expanded to discuss why HIV testing is (or is not) recommended for, military recruits, pregnant women, medical doctors.
It could even discuss how HIV testing was introduced to discourage high risk groups from donating blood?
Specifically it will explore the three "c"'s of HIV testing - confidentiallity, counselling and consent. And why HIV testing is available to less that 10% of people "at risk" in the world today
Sci guy 16:15, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Global optimization

message: The introductory sentences describe optimization in general. The distinction between global and local comes further down. Maybe one sentence should be put in the introduction about what makes an optimizer a truly global optimizer. Georg Stillfried (talk) 20:56, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition 

message: > "Global optimization is ... global optimization ..."
That's recursive.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:1061:B0A0:74F6:A589:2BC1:BF53 (talk) 13:21, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't define a word with the same word 

message: The entire section cites only Xiaopeng Luo (2018). "Minima distribution for global optimization". This publication only has 3 citations as of 2022. Moreover, looking at the Revision History, it seems this section was added in December 2018 by user Xiaopengluo, whose username suggests that they are the author of the cited publication. 
I think a general theory section for this article would be helpful, but relying on a single citation that seems to have had minimal impact seems poor practice.
I'd recommend deleting this, but for the time being I'm just going to leave a note here stating my objection. Ronald-Dumsfeld (talk) 03:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Theory Section Relies on Single Publication
Talk:Autonomous administrative divisions of China

message: Jiang, you reverted my move and I fail to see why.  This is a list of five regions of China.  It should be pluralized.  You pointed me at the nming conventions for plurals, and it agrees with this.  It is incorrect english to make a singular title that disagrees with  a plural list.  SchmuckyTheCat 15:45, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pluralize title 

message: This list is a political category inside the PRC, why did Instantnood revert the category to Mainland China?
SchmuckyTheCat 15:45, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: Why is there no specific discussion of ethnic sumu and ethnic townships? Thanks ~ Dpr 19:04, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Townships/sumu

message: I love this map; it is very helpful as I am conducting research on the ethnic minorities in NW China.  I believe there may be a slight mistake however and would appreciate someone verifying that and, if confirmed, correcting the map accordingly.  Unfortunately, I do not know how to edit such a map.  Possible error:  Qinghai province, Xining prefectural city includes the Datong Hui and Tu Autonomous County (northern part of the prefectural city) but it does not appear to be colored on the national map. 118.183.36.105 (talk) 12:26, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  National map of China with autonomous areas in green 

message: How many Ethnic villages in China?--Kaiyr (talk) 17:06, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic villages 
Talk:Dance Dance Revolution Solo Bass Mix

message: "Although only officially released in Japan, units exist worldwide." I'm pretty sure a US version was released, and it was missing a few songs. --SPUI (talk) 15:52, 15 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Releases

message: I have created a new article, Dance Dance Revolution Solo, which will cover both Solo BASS MIX and Solo 2000. Konami initially designed these games as a separate series, similar to how beatmania IIDX is to beatmania. The individual game sections are still incomplete, but I will expand them to include all the nuances of each mix. Once these sections are done, I plan to make both Dance Dance Revolution Solo BASS MIX and Dance Dance Revolution Solo 2000 redirect to Dance Dance Revolution Solo. Any objections? --Poiuyt Man (talk) 20:43, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merging
Talk:Ken Schaffer

message: I've cleaned up the second paragraph of the bio. Grammar and info/facts.
My information comes from first hand personal knowledge, not from a third party source or article.
The facts there are reasonably correct at this point.
The price quoted is approximately correct for some of the microphones sold.
Items questionable or unclear:
- not sure he worked as a publicist for Jerry Garcia.
- unclear what he sold to NASA or if they used any of his designs/inventions that came from the wireless microphone/wireless guitar system.
Bearzbear 03:54, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Facts on Ken Schaffer Bio 

message: Too many of the contributions to this article appear to be IP editors who are interested primarily in Schaffer, the Schaffer-Vega diversity invention, and the TV2Me invention. This appears to me to be the work of one person who is strongly connected to the topic. Binksternet (talk) 04:21, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest 

message: I see someone did a major clean-up on this article, beating me to the punch! I don't know exactly what the customs are for removing flags. Does everyone agree it meets Wikipedia's standards now?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rwaterberry (talk • contribs) 23:00, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict Of Interest flag? 