lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nutrient

message: Nutrition in Midwifery 45.215.253.22 (talk) 09:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: See Nutrition and pregnancy.  David notMD (talk) 18:38, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nutrition in Midwifery 

message: Which is not a nutrient 2409:4050:2D32:5A60:0:0:A489:BB0D (talk) 05:18, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Be specific. Is there a mineral, fatty acid, etc. that you question? David notMD (talk) 12:16, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science 

message: What are nutrients  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.223.119.44 (talk) 01:30, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  food and nutrition 

message: Micronutrients are not defined in the same section macros are. Leitmotiv (talk) 17:19, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Micronutrient undefined 

message: Nutrition 72.27.216.32 (talk) 16:05, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a question? David notMD (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science 

message: The article cites no high-quality secondary source in support of implied claim that dietary fiber is healthful. sbelknap (talk) 19:14, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fiber
Talk:Grass spider

message: http://www.ext.colostate.edu/pubs/insect/05512.html seems to say no (and calls them Funnel web spiders - Agelenidae) but I don't know enough about them to be able to update the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.132.193.41 (talk) 05:57, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  are they poisionous
Talk:1779

message: Marshman - Cook is already listed here under the "Deaths" section :) Adam Bishop 19:48, 5 Aug 2003 (UTC)

message: I have made some year layout proposals which would affect a significant proportion of the year pages: an example of proposed style is 1850. It is detailed on my talk page. However pre 1800 the change is largely cosmetic.
If no-one flags where I have put the discussion on my talk page that they object in a month I will start making everything consistent. It may take some time... --BozMo 19:31, 10 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  years page layout

message: :: [See: Talk:1780#Images.  -Wikid77 13:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 
Talk:Tramadol

message: Why is there no warning about mixing a narcotic with Benzodiazepines?? Or did I miss it?? Lady Meg (talk) 05:26, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mix with Benzos 

message: Tramadol will be banned for all international sport by WADA effective January 1, 2024. I don't have time to find the citation for this but should be easy to verify. 207.180.169.36 (talk) 14:25, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  WADA ban 

message: Tramadol is a SYNTHETIC opioid analgesic Kenntex (talk) 02:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanism of action
Talk:Évry, Essonne

message: Translation of the overview section of the French Wiki: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C9vry
Bill 20:15, 5 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: My answer on your talk page. olivier 15:13, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Dear anonymous contributor from Évry, please leave the INSEE estimate and stop replacing it with the figure you find on the Évry website. The city hall website is using an outdated figure from before the 2004 and 2005 census campaigns. The INSEE estimate (as of July 1, 2004) was released in January 2006, it is the most up-to-date, and it supercedes all other estimates. Hardouin 23:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

text: D'arcy, if you want to rant about how bad the French are, there are probably some dedicated forums for that (perhaps on foxnews.com?), but Wikipedia is not the proper place for your expression of aversion for all things French. Hardouin 13:23, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Cher ami, how typically French; you can discuss what you like on the discussion page so long as you agree with them.  Not only did they loose two world wars, they've never won a war in their entire history. I wonder why?
D'arcy.
D'Arcy's got a very valid point on French people's ability to compromise but I agree with Hardouin that there is a place to make such statements - not on Wikipedia's Talk page about (what was it?) the city of Evry. Thanks. Martin (French)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.129.163.212 (talk) 10:04, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Global

message: Perhaps useful somewhere:Global is a  synonym of worldwide and means of, or relating to, or involving the entire world, in the general sense or as the planet Earth."Global", Oxford English Dictionary, Second Edition 1989  
The adjective global and the adverb globally mean pertaining to, or embracing, the totality of a number of items, categories, etc. They also mean comprehensive and all-inclusive. 
It has been argued that global has replaced international or world as a way of referring to issues, processes and structures that affect human beings collectively."Advances in sociological knowledge: Over Half a Century", Nikolǎi Genov, page 38, 15th World Congress of Sociology, July 2002, Brisbane, Australia
Conceptual associations
*Global event, one that has an effect on on the entire planet.
*Global activity, describing actions of an entity, usually commercial that spans the planetary surface.
--Jerzy•t 23:11, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed non-Dab material 

message: Do not bother with the greetings and service all game clash F Clans extortionist who is 40 levels higher than they are able to visit Clan
REQ
The Clan code : # P8G9VYY8  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.235.161.118 (talk) 11:57, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clash Of Clans 
Talk:Tutankhamun

message: King Tutankhamun, originaly got the name King Tut from his great grandmother, who died shortly after suffering from disease also called Tutonia. Leap Codinski (talk) 00:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. User:CanonNi (talk • contribs) 11:22, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 3 June 2024
Talk:Phichit province

message: It has contradicting sources about the symbol tree of this province:
*  says Ironwood
* The TAT  also says Ironwood
* The Ministery of the Interior in their province guide say Ficus religiosa 
* also says Ficus religiosa, but most probable copied from the above site, as it also uses the same image
andy 19:51, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC)

message: What is the correct Thai spelling of Phichit? According to User:Media lib it should be พิจิตร์, however almost all sources spell it พิจิตร without the additional mark to make the last letter silent. The google test is 80,000:20, and the government pages are among the 80,000. Also in my books I only found the spelling without the mark. However the letter is really silent, thus it would be logical to put that mark. But I somehow doubt that the official spelling really has that mark, the google test is a bit too clear to make the version without just a common mistake. Can anyone give an insight on it? andy 22:03, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I apologize for having confused matters here. Yesterday I drove nearby Amphoe Mueang Phichit - not because of that silent letter. The official spelling is indeed พิจิตร. In the future I will believe google more, I promise. To Andy: will rev the German text. --Media lib 02:56, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

text: Actually it's not silent, it's a final consonant cluster. But since this form of final consonant cluster is only '-xร', no one pronounces the last 'ร'. Here are some common words: บุตร, สมัคร, สมุทร. Also Thaksin Shinawatra's last name, see Thai (pronounced 'chin na wat'). Notice that the romanized '-xร' often be '-xr' or '-xra'. Conclusion, simplified, it is an extra rule of final consonant cluster, applied only for '-xร'. Please note that there is no such real rule, but I put here for ease of understand. -- PaePae 12:44, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Additional, for reference, it is a sort of 'real consonant cluster' (คำควบแท้ or คำควบกล้ำแท้), one of two consonant cluster classes. Opposed to 'unreal consonant cluster' (คำควบไม่แท้ or คำควบกล้ำไม่แท้) -- PaePae 13:43, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling of &#3614;&#3636;&#3592;&#3636;&#3605;&#3619;
Talk:Economy of Bermuda

message: The anonymous user 68.10.115.135 sent the following to me by email:
:Hi, I put that stuff about "for which it is now a world center" in because there's now a bigger pool of re-investment insurance capital available in Bermuda than there is in London, which I thought was notable. Re-insurance is now by far and away the largest sector of the international business in Bermuda - one only needs to look at the giant buildings put up by ACE and XL to see that!
:I'll try and dig up some actual statistics and put that all in the article, unless you have some reason why I shouldn't.
Saying it's "a" world centre is just a somewhat biased way of saying it's one of the biggest. But there's no point in arguing about the best way to summarise this important point down to half a sentence -- go ahead and write a paragraph about it. 
-- Tim Starling 00:06, Aug 6, 2003 (UTC)
Will do - it may take me a while to dig up the data, though, as I want to cover two wholly separate points: first, Bermuda's role in the world re-insurance market, and second, re-insurance's role in Bermuda's offshore business sector. I recall the first from an article I saw in RG magazine while waiting in the Bank of Bermuda one day, but finding the data online may be a bit tricky. -- Noel Chiappa
: According to , which is supported by the Royal Gazette, Bermuda's main newspaper, "Bermuda-based companies provide 30%, the largest block, of Lloyd's total capacity", which I think qualifies it to call itself "a world center" for re-insurance. Noel (talk) 03:50, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:In Through the Out Door/Archive 1

message: I removed "-drawn ??query this ", and clarified it a bit. Not sure what was being queried - the factual correctness of the statement, or maybe the term "line drawn" was ambiguous, implying hand drawn. Hopefully the edition should make it clear. If it was factual correctness, well - I have a copy here, it's true! GRAHAMUK 00:24, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Talk:KV5

message: Hopefully I'll get around to fleshing this out soon. :-)
Fab 01:22, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Details

message: The colorful 3D pictue is taken from Thomas O. Mills "book of truth" which makes a connection between the Hopi culture and the egyptian civilization. Based on this theory the picture assumes how the grave would look like, and shows it as if this is the grave's shape. The actual digging and it's illustrations shown below shows that the structure turned out to be different than Mr. Mills has assumed. This means that the drawing, although shows the main parts of the grave well, is misleading as a whole, and shows rooms which were never there, omits areas which were uncovered, and adds comments which are based mainly on the imagination of Mr. Mills.
So this image, although very colorful, should be taken down before the misleading info it decipts start appearing in other places. The duke (talk) 09:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The picture Location of New Chamber and the Reason Why at KV-5.jpeg is misleading
Talk:Alfred Packer

message: Can someone fix his name please 147.219.104.101 (talk) 23:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Are we certain which is correct? 2600:8803:7506:D400:152B:CC57:C82F:DE27 (talk) 01:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Zhongshan

message: Is the World Lamp King Museum really under construction?
:According to Skyscraperpage.com, it should have been completed in 2010 and is currently on-hold. 82.141.119.188 (talk) 11:16, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: World Lamp King Museum

message: Is the number correct?
So far as I know it's more than 150k.
Realhon5 (talk) 04:50, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population of Xiaolan Town 

message: Zhongshan 5.113.21.179 (talk) 00:16, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zhongshan
Talk:1937

message: As per discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Years the year in topic paragraph is scheduled to be deleted as it largely duplicates the links in the top box, and is not consistent with other year. Any objections should be made on that page please --BozMo|talk 19:34, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year in topic 

message: [See: Talk:1950#Format.  -Wikid77 13:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 
Talk:Steaming

message: :Steaming out door can be done with some banana leaves wrap up meat, poultry and fish and bury under the sand or ash. Also, some place they cover meat(fish) with crey then burn into the fire. 
does not sound like cooking by steam at all.  I don't understand why it was added here.  Kowloonese 09:05, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  The latest addition 

message: I think the examples of "Chinese steamed eggs" and "Reheating a commercially sold frozen meal by steaming in a wok" are not really a steaming -- according to the explanation in the Method section "The food is kept separate from the boiling water but has direct contact with the steam, resulting in a moist texture to the food. This differs from double boiling, in which contact with steam is undesired." -- 180.183.131.188 (talk) 16:52, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriateness of Steamed egg and Reheating examples (photos) 

message: Oh gosh this is the worst article i've ever read here. someone please wipe it and rewrite from scratch  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.78.90.194 (talk) 02:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this 

message: Well, hope somebody will jump in and follow up on me. 
*As noted by User:Kowloonese, there needs to be a separate section where steaming without pans/woks and water could be described. In :ja:蒸し物, they introduce  that uses a clay pan in which fish/poultry is steamed with its own moisture. 
* I added an image against 79.78.90.194's note. The food is in a dish that controls moisture contact with the food itself, thus a make-shift vessell works to steam. --Omotecho (talk) 22:12, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded by translating ja and added images
Talk:History of house music

message: I think this article should be merged with house music.  That article is kind of short anyway and could be consolidated somewhat, and having an entirely separate "history" page seems like overkill.   -- Lexor 10:43, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Since nobody objected, I went ahead and did the merge. --Lexor 07:08, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Encomium

message: Is it EncoNium, or EncoMium? Th eimage seems to show the latter, but the page itself is the former. GRAHAMUK 10:43, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling?

message: Encomium is a greek word? Sounds Latin to me.
The word encomium written in the Roman alphabet is a Latin word, but it is originally, and very obviously, a Greek word. The Greek word ἐγκώμιον comes from the Greek words ἐν ("in") and κῶμος ("village festival," where a victor or other person was praised), hence the substantive ἐγκώμιον originally meaning "a song in honor of a conqueror, a eulogy." --74.140.205.36 (talk) 03:33, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Greek?

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 10:43, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: What WikiProject for his article?  Literature? Medieval? Please add if you know. --DThomsen8 (talk) 02:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject for Encomium?
Talk:.org

message: Would it be useful to have a complete list of all countries/territories that use the .org.xx system for [non-profit] organizations? I'm sure that there are more countries that do so, not just UK, China, Mexico, and NZ. --seav 12:10, Aug 6, 2003 (UTC)
:You can add Thailand and Japan for sure, only that it is .or.th and .or.jp respectively. andy 12:12, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  Countries 

message: In the 'History' section; '.us' was not established in January 1985. 240B:252:381:6800:6486:23FF:FEA7:7CE3 (talk) 12:12, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --TheImaCow (talk) 14:26, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Per  the domain was certainly defined a few months before 1985, so it remains to be defined what the term established exactly means. I suppose that it means installed in the DNS, which is reasonable and probably documented, in addition to be the date listed in WHOIS queries. kbrose (talk) 17:33, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

text: The .us page says 'Introduced  February 15, 1985', all other domain pages mentioned say 'Introduced  January 1, 1985'. 240B:252:381:6800:6486:23FF:FEA7:7CE3 (talk) 03:12, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Have reworded. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:48, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2020 

message: The article mentions "an .org domain" at one point. If one pronounces ".org" as "org" then this is correct. But, if one pronounces the TLD as "dot org", then the phrase should be "a .org domain" instead. I don't know what the most common way of pronouncing it would be. Perhaps the sentence should be rephrased to avoid the issue. CapnPhantasm (talk) 00:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Sad (disambiguation)

message: I noticed that the Real Sociedad page states that their full name is "Real Sociedad de Fútbol, S.A.D.".  Does anybody know  what S.A.D. stands for in that context? If so, please share the knowledge and add it to the list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.23.54.142 (talk) 20:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The es Wikipedia tells me it's a "sociedad anónima deportiva", or sports corporation (according to Google Translate). -- Perey (talk) 15:53, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real Sociedad de Fútbol, S.A.D. 

message: I've moved the acronym entries to . Unlike, say, the musical entries on this page, the initials S-A-D don't seem to have any connection to the primary topic  (except possibly for ). Also, several of the entries had significantly more pageviews than the primary topic, so it seemed logical that they should be disambiguated on a separate page. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:18, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate disambiguation page for SAD
Talk:Computer animation

message: Hello,
Over the next few weeks I plan to separate the topics of 3D and 2D animation into two separate categories as is noted on this article's "To-do list." I will be sure to preserve the content and particularly focus on making the article more readable and organized by allowing each sub topic to have its own section. Feel free to leave any suggestions here or questions about what I will do here. ZacZig (talk) 18:07, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I definitely support. —theMainLogan (t•c) 01:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting 3D and 2D into two different categories
Talk:Anattā

message: The lede stated In Buddhism, the term anattā (Pali) or anātman (Sanskrit) refers to the doctrine of "non-self", that there is no unchanging, permanent self, soul or essence in living beings.
The qualification that this refers only to living beings is false for all Buddhism, especially (but not solely) the Mahayana tradition of Nagarjuna following Candrakirti.
Candrakirti's Bodhisattvayogacaryācatuḥśatakaṭikā 256.1.7 states that 'self' is an essence of things that does not depend on others; it is an intrinsic nature. The non-existence of that is selflessness (Anatta)
This citation is translated in Vol. 3 
20040302 (talk) 10:30, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  living beings - category error: false. 

message: Hi all, please note that I moved this page from “Anatta” to “Anattā” just now. Anatta is now a redirect to this new page. I have also fixed all the double redirects. -Colathewikian (talk) 13:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice: Page moved 

message: Does  belong in Wikipedia voice? I assume a Hindu might call consciousness the empirical coordinate. Srnec (talk) 15:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 

message: Just a note that it feels incongruous to use "anattā" in the Mahayana section when the discourse in that tradition rarely uses Pali terms, and certainly not for this concept. Would anyone be opposed to changing it to "anātman" in that section, or do people feel that consistency is more important than congruity? DJLayton4 (talk) 15:46, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Congruity seems to be the pattern used on other pages such as prajna, maitri and karma. So if that is the case than yeah i think making the page congruous with the respective traditions languages makes sense. Wikiman5676 (talk) 04:54, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Anattā vs. Anātman in Mahayana Section 

message: This is already a pretty long article, and in my opinion, having Etymology and Nomenclature at the top is largely padding that doesn't serve to inform the reader about what the meat of the concept really is past the (probably necessarily) simplistic opening paragraph. Especially since this is likely one of the first articles people trying to learn about Buddhism might read, the paragraph about "non-Self" vs "not-Self" uses too obscure terminology. It's a good section, but it should be at the end of the article or on Wiktionary. Makhnoboi19 (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Etymology and Nomenclature really necessary?
Talk:Prince Augustus Frederick, Duke of Sussex

message: Why do the children have an italian surname?? Muriel Gottrop 14:23, 6 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Duke of Sussex is a stub article whose content would be ideally suited to existing as a section of this page - because there has been only one Duke DBD 14:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree Astrotrain 14:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Does anyone know the details of both parents being descended from the House of Este? From whom (for each)? – (empoor) 15:32, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: From the article House of Este: (House of Welf is House of Guelph) = Dukes of Brunswick and Luneburg = Electors of Hanover = Britain's royal house from George I to Queen Victoria, 1714-1901. Eddaido (talk) 21:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, thank you. I immediately skipped the introductory paragraphs of that article, and couldn't find anything else in the actual content. But, yes, it's right there in the introduction. – (empoor) 20:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  House of Este 

message: Both this article and the one on Augusta say they lived together until 1801 when he was awarded a grant of £12,000. Their marriage had been annulled, but wikipedia reads as though he was paid off, and for a chunk of moolah, he agreed to leave her (and his 7-y-o son and new baby).
Is this unfortunate wording, or true, and if true, is there citable evidence? Nick Barnett (talk) 08:36, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separation 
Talk:Joanot Martorell

message: Joanot Martorell is a valencian writer. Why there is a link to Catalonia? Valencia is not Catalonia, it has got its own culture (that is not catalan), history and political organization. 
He would be more rigorous not to make references to other cultures like the Catalan one, specially when political connotations of an existing nationalism in that culture exist that it tries to absorb the Valencian one.
But Valencian is only a synonyme for Catalan language, all this discussions if valencian is another language should be left to the academic circles and they all say that "valencian" is only another name for saying "catalan". With other words catalan=valencian, like castellano is the same for spanisch. The Academy who regulates the "valencian" says also that valencian is another word for the language called "catalan" in all the other areas with this language.
Greeting, Georg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.87.195.190 (talk) 13:52, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the link to Catalonia? 