lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Look-alike

message: There was a guy on The Today Show who looked exactly like Conan O'Brien. He even turned up on Conan's show later on. I can't remember his name, though. Any help?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.30.150.195 (talk) 04:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conan

message: Should Look alike contest be merged into this article? ZueJay (talk) 19:24, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge [[Look alike contest]]?

message: :The Internationally recognised, non-profit exclusive membership organisation www.lookalikes-unite.com represents, supports and assists the highest quality celebrity impersonators and is a highly reliable and independent source of information and reference for professional tribute acts and those interested in this niche area of the entertainment industry.
Material above moved from article for discussion.  Seems quite commercially oriented to me.  WBardwin 03:56, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercial entry?

message: I'm pretty sure that Saddam Hussein could not possibly have been interviewed in January 2008, you know,  on account of his being dead since 2006. The danger of editing wikipedia is not blatantly false, ridiculous statements but the seemingly factual ones that don't automatically stand out unless read in full. Is there any way of automatically cross-checking this with other wikipedia entries to see if the information is in line? That way the chance of factual accuracy is increased (or decreased, I suppose, if people are determined enough!)
:The interviews with Saddam Hussein were conducted prior to his execution, and no one ever claimed the contrary.  Nihil novi (talk) 01:45, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saddam Hussein's 2008 Interview
Talk:Whiteabbey

message: Just removed some non-encylopaedic rubbish, and cleaned up some of the spelling and grammar. There appears to have been a history of minor vandalism on this article historically, so I'll be keeping an eye open.  
ComradeStalin1979 21:37, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up 
Talk:Waterfoot, County Antrim

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20070930155029/http://www.culturenorthernireland.org/town_Home.aspx?co=16&to=348&ca=0&sca=0&navID=1. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  ♠Vami_IV†♠ 09:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Templepatrick

message: There is a gentleman from Templepatrick who is chief executive of the gaming company - Namco. Can anyone remember his name? would he be notable enough to be mentioned. Afterlife10 (talk) 11:04, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Namco 
Talk:Stranocum

message: Name 
J. O'Donovan, in 1832, argues that the name Stranocum possibly comes from the Irish Srath an Abha Cam (modern Irish: Srath an Abhainn Cam) meaning the "strath of the crooked river". This may refer to the twisted course of the River Bush around the village.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.125.81 (talk) 16:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Stoneyford, County Antrim

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Sennecaster  (What now?) 16:33, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Template talk:WikiProject Northern Ireland

message: The second "comments here" does not seem to work at Talk:Northern Ireland or any other page with a space in its title. --Henrygb 21:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up. I've fixed this now, though the 'article grading' section may be a candidate for pruning due to complaints about this template's size (see discussion above). --Mal 19:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Strange bug

message: It would be very helpful to convert this to Template:WPBannerMeta code. — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont]  ‹(-¿-)› 21:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There's now a WPBannerMeta version in the sandbox. Does it look ok? -- WOSlinker (talk) 07:57, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now implemented. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 18:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete code
Talk:Fair Head

message: Might not be notable enough for its own article. If this can be improved, perhaps it should go here? Adam9007 (talk) 00:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Complete Scream cliff]] 

message: Added the climbing infobox here. Britishfinance (talk) 22:07, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added infobox
Talk:Larne Lough

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://jncc.gov.uk/jncc-assets/RIS/UK12013.pdf https://archive.is/20120805115629/http://www.ni-environment.gov.uk/biodiversity/designated-areas/ramsar/ramsar_larnelough.htm. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  ♠Vami_IV†♠ 03:34, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Slemish

message: Hi. An LTA sockmaster has been warring on this article for some time. Creating new socks to avoid PP controls. And IP hopping to avoid 3RR norms. I am adding this note - not for his attention - but out of consideration to any other editors who query the edit history or edit patterns. In short, the LTA block-evading user seeks to change the accepted status quo (which presents the association of St Patrick with Slemish as tradition) to a contra-convention position (which presents the association as one of absolute fact). The latter is not consistent with the references in the article. Including those which confirm that, since the 19th century, there have been queries as to the compatibility of the Slemish traditions with other traditions associated with Patrick. Including with the text of Patrick's Confessio. (The questions around the association are discussed extensively by Bury in his 'The Life of St. Patrick and His Place in History' (1905), by White in his 'Saint Patrick: His Writings and Life' (1920), and more recently by Duffy in 'Patrick in His Own Words' (2000).) Slán. Guliolopez (talk) 15:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Patrick
Talk:Glens of Antrim

message: Would anybody here know enough about the history of Irish in this famously Irish area? I've just been reading Feis na nGleann: A Century of Gaelic Culture in the Antrim Glens by Eamon Phoenix, Padraic Ó Cléireacháin, Eileen McAuley and Nuala McSparran and it's an eye opener. Some of it can be read here on Google Books. When did the last native speakers die? What famous Irish language poets and poems are from the area? According to the above book, for instance, the last Gaelic poet of the area was a Protestant clergyman named John McCambridge who wrote Áird a Chuain. Also, in what ways is traditional music in the glens distinctive from, say, Donegal, Leitrim or Clare? 79.97.154.238 (talk) 20:52, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing as most Gaels in County Antrim especially in Moyle district are of Scotch-Gaelic origin it might differ from Donegal etc. in that way. Mabuska (talk) 10:11, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Irish language & culture
Talk:Kurdaitcha

message: Removed weasel words tags ("please name specific person or group") from two places inside the block quote. The source of the quote itself is already cited quite specifically. 208.207.96.203 21:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasels

message: The claim that Kurdaitcha is not considered murder in austrailian law is cited to a page at everything2.com, but I don't think that's a reliable source. It's effectively self-published, and the author doesn't explain how they know that its not considered murder. I'm going to take out the citation and add in a citation needed tag for now. I had a brief look for a reliable source on this one way or the other and didn't find one, I think if no-one else can find one we should delete the section. sorsoup (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:07, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Now deleted. sorsoup (talk) 01:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian Law 

message: " Kurdaitcha (or kurdaitcha man) is a ritual "executioner" in Australian Aboriginal culture. The word is from the Arrernte people and is also used by Europeans.... "  (original post)
"Kurdaitcha (or kurdaitcha man) is a ritual "executioner" in Australian Aboriginal culture (specifically the term comes from the Arrernte people)."  (changes I made)
I made some modification. I feel the original contribution was too general. There is no such thing as a single Australian Aboriginal culture. Every 'tribe'(for lack of a better term) had their own languages and other cultural differences. The term "kurdaitcha" is only use by the Arrernte people. Other tribal groups may term such practices by other names.
Henry123ifa (talk) 11:26, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should either be at a generic title or be specifically about the Kurdaitcha concept in Arrernte culture. Hack (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modification 

message: "Aborigines put curse on Australian PM etc". European Network for Indigenous Australian Rights: news. Sydney: einar.org. 20 April 2004. Retrieved 8 February 2011. 
Link does not work. --Delabarquera (talk) 08:59, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link 

message: BTW How is it pronounced?  [ˈkʊʁdeˈɪt͡ʃa]? Audio example? --Delabarquera (talk) 08:47, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronounciation?
Talk:London Underground D78 Stock

message: 213.152.230.220 07:36, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

message: I've found two primary sources that say the D stock will be withdrawn from "later in 2014"/"later this year" (both documents dated July 2014) paragraph 4.1, PDF page 3 paragraph 2.1.2 PDF page 6. However there are non-RS sources saying the first one was withdrawn this month (January 2015). I haven't found any reliable secondary sources in this search but others might. Thryduulf (talk) 21:32, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Withdrawal 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :D Stock. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 25#D Stock until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:22, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "D Stock" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:London Underground A60 and A62 Stock

message: Due to Poeloq recent question whenever we could source this statement "At 9'8" (approx 2.95m) these are Britains' widest trains.", I have modified this statement to say "At 9'7" (approx 2.95m) these are London Underground's widest trains." and have added a reference. MiniEntente 14:30, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

message: The infobox disagrees with the prose on how wide the train is - can someone sort this out? -mattbuck (Talk) 01:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Width 

message: I was alerted off-wiki to repeated attempts to introduce a factual error into this article, namely that the trains entered service on 31  August 1959 rather than 12 June 1961. I've added three reliable sources (well two of them are different editions of the first) that support the later date. It is speculated that the anonymous editor responsible, 86.161.14.162, will continue to attempt to introduce the inaccuracy into the article so editors should look out for that. Thryduulf (talk) 02:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry into service date 

message: I hope that my terminology from my Flickr set should clear things up:
*Set No. 0 = Two Cars: a driving motor (5000) and trailer car (6000) permanently coupled to each other.
*Unit = Four Cars or Two Sets.
*Train = Eight Cars, Four Sets or Two Units.
*A6x = A60 and A62 Stock
--Marianian(talk) 10:26, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminology 
Talk:London Underground C Stock (District Railway)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :C Stock. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 25#C Stock until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "C Stock" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:London Underground D Stock (District Railway)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :C Stock. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 25#C Stock until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:49, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "C Stock" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: See Talk:London Underground C Stock#Requested move 30 June 2020. C2A06 (About • Talk • Edits) 07:18, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed page move
Talk:Anushakti Nagar

message: The 'Nutan Vidya Mandir' does not fall in Anushakti Nagar area. Hence removing from the article.  Added HBNI, Training School Details located in Anushakti  Nagar wikieinstein (talk) 06:12, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  School outside 

message: I feel that the discussion on colony culture is quite one-sided and doesn't represent the commonly held views. More importantly, Anushaktinagar isn't a large enough geographical unit that its culture would merit any discussion at all in its Wikipedia page. Seems rather petty. Like someone using the page to act out personal agendas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.48.192.141 (talk) 07:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Colony culture
Talk:United Airlines Flight 718

message: I initially had problems using the direct link to the Accident Report that was listed in the article. I was getting re-directed to a Minnesota page for unknown reasons, and the accident report was not there.  If this happens to you, try this procedure:
* First visit: http://dotlibrary.specialcollection.net/
* Next, click the link that says "Historical Aircraft Accident Reports (1934-1965)"
* Then click the "1956" link
* Finally, choose "TRANS WORLD AIRLINES AND UNITED AIRLINES"
I suspect that an initial visit to the special collection main page is necessary first, in order to set some cookies.  Once the cookies were set I could access any and all reports directly, including using the original direct link in the wikipedia article (which didn't work for me at first.) - Itsfullofstars 22:47, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right; how frustrating. I wish there was a way to link directly. Argh. Thanks for pointing this out. --Charlene 08:08, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accessing the Accident Report
Talk:Lentvaris

message: Expanded and tidied somewhat.--Po Kadzieli (talk) 02:24, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

message: "Local Polish soldiers, who had fought in the September Campaign, were attacked and interned by Lithuanians in the town of Kretinga.[" - Kretinga is a town on the baltic coast of Lithuania! What relevance does this statement have to Lentvaris a town which is at the opposite side of Lithuania? 80.151.9.187 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 15:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance to this article 
Talk:Verkiai

message: Isn't the Trinapolis church in Baltupiai, not Verkiai ? Historically Verkiai was a separate village,
and one had to cross Trinopolis when going to Verkiai from Vilnius, which would suggest it was a separate site. Unless you mean the whole elderate of course. --Lysytalk 12:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And to add, Verkiai elderate includes Baltupiai, Jeruzalė, Santariškės, Balsiai, Visoriai, and Verkiai (historical place). Renata 14:00, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right that it probably does not make sense to have separate articles for Verkiai and Verkiai elderate at the moment, but maybe some distinction could be in the article, so that it is clearer for non-Lithuanian readers, that these are in fact two different things (although of course not that very different). --Lysytalk 17:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trinapolis church 

message: See comment here: . It covers the same issue.radek (talk) 17:54, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 
Talk:London Underground 1938 Stock

message: : Although this appears immediately before the first use of abbreviations, shouldn’t it more properly be in the ‘Technical’ section? Useddenim (talk) 12:34, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps; but MOS:ACRO requires that an acronym be defined on first use. They are used not just in "Nine-car trains" which is where all those  , but also in "1935/1949 Stock", both sections being before "Technical". We can't expect any but the initiated to know what a SNDM is unless we spell it out in full the first time that the term is used. --Redrose64 (talk) 13:25, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of car 
Talk:London Underground 1967 Stock

message: I have removed "The top speed was 50 mph (80kmh)." from the lead, as these numbers are for the 2009 stock, and are not supported by the following ref, which only supports 14,000km for mean distance before failure. Bob1960evens (talk) 18:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Top speed

message: 3438 is a 1972 Stock car. At least check the car numbers of the 1972 Stock which are available *on the wikipedia page* before writing complete nonsense here. Slrpjude (talk) 10:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-Withdrawal Uses
Talk:London Underground 1972 Stock

message: According to Tubeprune, the government decreed that the London Transport Executive order the 33 trains of 1972 Mk2 Stock just to keep Metro-Cammell in business, and make the excuse that these trains would eventually be used on what became the Jubilee line.
Is this true? There don't appear to be any other sources that back this up... Bluebird207 (talk) 01:20, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 1972 Mk2 Stock - is it true how it was ordered?

message: 1972 Stock Will Be Running In Service On Bakerloo Line Along With 1973 Stock. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.204.142.79 (talk) 14:29, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: What? The 1972 stock is already on the Bakerloo, and has been for some decades. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:36, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Running On Bakerloo Line 

message: In addition to being the oldest EMUs in normal service in Britain, aren't the 1972 stock vehicles the oldest public transport vehicles of any kind in normal service in Britain? 2A00:23EE:16F8:1D8E:8DE0:81CA:1312:5F61 (talk) 17:10, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest public transport vehicles of any kind in normal service in Britain? 

message: In 2025, the New Tube for London will replace 1972 Stock and will become the new Bakerloo Line train. 81.96.145.174 (talk) 15:38, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @81.96.145.174 "Talk pages are for discussing the article, not for general conversation about the article's subject" - TfL have not agreed to the Bakerloo line option at this time (if they have, we need a source to include it in the article) Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines  Turini2 (talk) 13:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  2024 Stock Replaces 1972 Stock
Talk:Al Gomhuria

message: I can't find any information on this aircraft, unless it's the Gomhuria mentioned here. Marasmusine 10:47, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:London Underground battery–electric locomotives

message: I added some info and reorganized this page. I think it no longer deserves the Stub status since most of the available information has been written and only small bits of info can probably be added Ysignal 20:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)