lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:White fuming nitric acid

message: Is WFNA really hypergolic with gasoline?  I do not think so.  DonPMitchell (talk) 09:06, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypergolics 

message: I see no reason to have a separate article for this particular grade of nitric acid. The contents should be merged back into the corresponding section of nitric acid, and some details could be trimmed or factored out.  --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 17:05, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: * Please let's have the discussion in Talk:Nitric acid.  (Sorry for not pointing it out earlier.) --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 01:33, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  No need for a separate article; merge back into [[nitric acid]]
Talk:Ytterbium(III) bromide

message: The data given in the chembox is not very reliable. It can't be significantly miscible in water, especially when one consider the relatively large size of the Ytterbium3+ and Bromine- ions. Moreover, the formula is 'YbBr2'. Probably it was copied from an article about Ytterbium(II) bromide. The melting point is also a little doubtful, compared to the fluoride and chloride. Zhieaanm (talk) 12:36, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zinc cyanide

message: Other names[hide]
potassium sulfocyanate
potassium isothiocyanate
potassium thiocyanide
This is listed in the infobox of zinc cyanide. Maybe it was meant to say "Other compounds" or such because neither sulfur or potassium are present. --Astavats (talk) 23:30, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other names 

message: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/06/130612224230.htm
76.175.67.240 (talk) 06:50, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads up!  Looks like novel result.  Here's the catch - Wikipedia is not really the appropriate medium for citing articles.  For example, JACS published 3000+ articles last year (aggregate article count per year in chem is tens of thousands!).  So Wikipedia's preference is for WP:SECONDARY (reviews, books) or historically important reports.  So if you see a review or a book on Zn(CN)2, please alert us.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:28, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: News on creating new porous products from Zinc Cyanide
Talk:Zinc phosphate

message: I was trying to find the chemical formula for this compound, and found that this one is wrong. No water molecules are included as a part of zinc phosphate, please fix this. ChoraAnimates (talk) 21:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemical formula 

message: Chemical formula and molecular mass are wrong in info box.  I didn’t check the other data. 2601:586:4100:3F00:B00E:DC6D:ED3B:1239 (talk) 00:32, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info box
Talk:Zinc phosphide

message: I'm with Derek Lowe on this one. Who thought "characteristic" would be a useful adjective?--Tawaki (talk) 12:48, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The odor of PH3 or P2H4 is pretty characteristic of many phosphides.  I am Smokefoot on this one. --Smokefoot (talk) 12:58, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Characteristic" odor.
Talk:Zinc sulfate

message: Article should state what is smells and taste like.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.203.0.149 (talk) 00:43, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

message: CAS Number question
The CAS number is for the anhydrous form.  Is there a way to indicate this?  Is there a way to indicate multiple CAS numbers for different hydrated forms?  The Chembox template was not immediately amenable, and I don't want to freelance if there is an accepted practice.173.8.220.209 (talk) 18:03, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zirconium(II) hydride

message: It appears that this is an article about the unstable molecular ZrH2 molecule. The chembox is a left over from when it was about the compound ZrH2 formed  by the reaction of hydrogen and Zirconium metal. I commented out the chem box to prevent confusion. Axiosaurus (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed the chem box
Talk:Zirconium(IV) silicate

message: 6/18/13: Should this page be merged with the zircon page?  Aren't zircon and zirconium silicate the same thing?  EDIT: Never mind, just found the discussion on the zircon page.  I still think they should be merged, but it looks like there is no consensus.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.93.173.226 (talk) 17:09, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:4581 Asclepius

message: Was the near-collision date Mar 22 or Mar 23? This page currently says Mar 22, but the below page says  Mar 23 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_deflection_strategies#1989
:The 22nd. I fixed it. Saros136 (talk) 02:50, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, 275 Kelvins is 2 Celsius, or 36 Fahrenheit. Chilly, but livable with a jacket. Just stay indoors there or in your space suit. GBC (talk) 10:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Content copied from near-earth asteroid :
On March 23, 1989 the 300 meter (1,000-foot) diameter Apollo asteroid 4581 Asclepius (1989 FC) missed the Earth by 700,000 kilometers (400,000 miles) passing through the exact position where the Earth was only 6 hours before. If the asteroid had impacted it would have created the largest explosion in recorded history, thousands of times more powerful than the Tsar Bomba.  It attracted widespread attention as early calculations had its passage being as close as 40,000 miles from the Earth, with large uncertainties that allowed for the possibility of it striking the Earth.
Could add to this article Rod57 (talk) 16:30, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could add 

message: personally, i prefer AU, but i see Gm used pretty consistently on similar pages.  one thing's for sure: megametre is not the way to go.
also, i think megajoule is better than kiloton-TNT-equivalent.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterhoneyman (talk • contribs) 00:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units 
Template talk:Solookitup

message: Should en.wikipedia.org be listed as a source?  Other Wikipedia articles are, emphatically, not sources to be used in writing an article. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals )
: Nor do I think Google is an authoritative reference.  Sure, its a perfectly good medium for finding references, but I think the tone of the statement says anything you Google is acceptable, which we all know is not true. // 3R1C 16:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Margareth Menezes

message: Fico puto da vida em ver essa boa cantora apoiando um piece-of-shit como o Mula!
Ajudei essa senhorita atitude!!!ela veio aqui na América,  no início da carreira dela, vendendo ingressos e chamando a galera para os shows dela.
Agora esse LIXO  fica apoiando um ladrão como o MULA!!!
Tenho nojo da sua atitude 2601:6C0:C100:8200:E56F:401C:5EA3:3FE9 (talk) 04:06, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traidora
Talk:An Lộc, Bình Phước

message: I would like to merge this entry with the Battle of An Loc entry. This page addresses no other aspect of An Loc besides that battle.Fideo 04:01, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy

message: Contrary to the diagnosis section of this entry, the test for Cholestasis is NOT readily available and can take a week or longer to get the results.  This is because only a few labs in the United States are capable of doing the test.  I was recently diagnosed with Cholestasis, and it took 7 days to get the results back.
 I've gotten the result overnight (in Israel) 77.126.15.106 (talk) 21:08, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: I understand this dz is caused by a mutation in MDR3.  Anyone know why it activates during pregnancy?Bakerstmd 16:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  pathophys? 

message: What is this disorder? The article explains everything but how it works. I added a section stub to start an explanation on this. Patcat88 (talk) 07:44, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  what on earth is this?
Talk:Balawat

message: There is also a village in INDIA by name BALAWAT. It is in Karnataka state, Bijapur District , Muddebihal taluk. Balawat village is abour 20 kilometers towords north east of Muddebihal.
BALAWAT is also family name in BASARKOD village in MUddebihal Taluk. Now some family members of Balawat live in BANGALORE,INIDA as well as in NEWJERSEY state in USA .VISHAAN BALAWAT is a USA citizen. He was born to Naveen Balawat and Soujanya Balawat 9 months ago.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.248.151 (talk) 07:59, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balawat in INDIA 

message: Nice section! I would include some more pictures, particularly detail pictures of the specific sections of the gate you describe. Are there any reconstructions of the bronze panels installed? Also, can you put the inscriptions in or can you link to them? Iagofan1616 (talk) 16:42, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gates Comments
Talk:Benegal Rama Rau

message: Dear Editors! There has been a discussion on India Portal related to mentioning of caste of subjects. The point is that mentioning caste of people, who have nothing to do with their caste, is found to be unnecessary by few editors. Hence the caste of the subject person needs to be deleted from the biography. I am not deleting the caste as of now but am only posting this here so that the regular editors of this article are well aware of it beforehand and no edit-wars take place. For details of discussion held on the portal please refer Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Mentioning_caste_of_Individuals. Your views if any are welcome there or even here.  And.... as the reasons of exclusion of caste pointed out were "irrelavant to notability of subject person", "privacy of the subject person", "inclusion of caste is like branding individuals", etc. other information included in the article which also fall under these cases will also be removed after discussions. Examples of it included religion, non-notable spouse's and children's and parents' information, previous occupation, lived in places, non-notability related educational qualification, etc.  Your views on this are also welcome here or at the India portal. -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 15:02, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Not here, please. There is a community discussion taking place at WT:INB and I would advise people to read the entire discussion before forming an opinion because the above summary is incorrect. Nothing more need be said here. - Sitush (talk) 01:30, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mentioning Caste
Talk:Joel Yanofsky

message: After a post on the Help Desk form an anonymous editor claiming the subject of the article is still alive, I removed the information stating he died in 2013 as unsourced. Salvidrim! ✉ 00:42, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The alleged death was added by User:Ciaranroy who has six other edits including a deleted edit. All six were blatant vandalism. It sounds like a high school kid. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:56, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I don't think we should spend much time discussing this; just a vandal. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:00, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject's alleged death
Talk:St. John's Jesuit Academy

message: This article was merged with St. John's Jesuit High School and Academy on 10 Aril 2008.  Don'tKnowItAtAll (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: I removed the citation tag from this article becuase all of the information has come from the knowledge of the contributers. Unless it is necessary to notate that the information is from the authors with out a previously published source, there is not, to my knowledge, any sources to be cited. Thank you Scottydude 04:24, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation
Talk:Gargano

message: There was some vandalism on this page but I removed it. Just passing foolishness. Rather, if you have time for foolishness, why not spend it on serious work? You only get so much time in life, you know. This article's content I believe is good. It's a useful article. The formatting needs work. WP places its references in templates, such as "cite web", "cite book" and "cite journal." You can find these easily in the help. Also mountains I believe - at least in most mountain articles I see - have the mountain box on the right. Check out any major mountain article. Thanks.Dave (talk) 11:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Formatting

message: The toponym "Monte Gargano", doesn't exist in Italian Geography. The Gargano Promontory, mainly consisting in the Gargano Massif, doesn't present any mount called "Gargano". The higher peak of the massif is named Monte Calvo. The article content is clearly related to the Italian geographical and historical subregion of "Gargano" and secondarly to the homonimous National Park. --Theirrulez (talk) 17:16, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: The article covers two discrete areas of knowledge.  What about splitting off the paleontological content to a separate article called, say, Gargano Island? Maias (talk) 01:30, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Fork?
Talk:Canarium

message: Seems to have enough material and extras to qualify as Start, or perhaps even C class, for both projects.  —johndburger 13:25, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Promoted to Start class
Talk:Aucoumea klaineana

message: A cursory look-see revealed that this might not be the correct demonym.  I'll let more attentive players judge.Longinus876 (talk) 18:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gaboon?
Talk:Commiphora

message: When I saw this I assumed that it would link to either a description of the biological family (Burseraceae) or a group of plants forming a family in a more general sense.  Instead it links separately to frankincense and myrrh rather than the plants involved.    The Wiki entry on Burseaceae says "The Burseraceae is also known as the Torchwood family, the frankincense and myrrh family, or simply the incense tree family."  Would it be reasonable to add "also known as "the incense tree family, or Burseraceae" with a link to Burseraceae as well as the links to frank. and myrrh? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 03:27, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "frankincense and myrrh family"
Talk:Bursera

message: Forgot to mention in edit summary of this edit that one ref was a de facto duplicate of another: i.e., the duplicate took precisely the same article cited by the first, but from a different web address. The first has a DOI so I let that one stand in for the second. Hamamelis (talk) 08:56, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref duplication
Talk:Terminalia (plant)

message: Added additional species from these sources: 1
2
89.240.7.222 19:34, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

message: I realise that the article on a Roman festival may have seniority in WP, but it has an average of 14 pageviews per day over the last 90 days, this Terminalia (plant) has 70 views per day at the same time. Correct me if I am wrong, but are not some of this articles pageviews going to be by people like me looking for the Terminalia genus page, arriving at the Terminalia festival article, going to disambiguation and hence to the trees (love the trees). So can we change "Terminalia" to "Terminalia (festival)" and change "Terminalia (plant)" to "Terminalia"? 11:29, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's confusing when you make the same post on in multiple talk pages as any discussion can be splintered making determination of any consensus more difficult. Best practice is to select one location for the discussion and then post pointers linking to that discussion elsewhere. I've responded at Talk:Terminalia#Can we change names please. older ≠ wiser 12:36, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing names
Talk:Terminalia bellirica

message: These two articles both have the same 3 photos 
under the Gallery section.(tree trunk, hanging 
fruit, and fallen fruit).
Which one is correct?
Terminalia bellirica
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibhitaki
Terminalia chebula
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haritaki
Truthseekermon (talk) 03:38, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAME PHOTOS
Talk:Brian Inglis

message: A family member asked me to correct some minor errors in the Inglis entry, which I did. I am a researcher of economic history grateful to have had one of Brian Inglis' books to draw on as a reference source, and very occasionally contribute a few words to the Wikipedia. translator 04:33, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections 

message: What was the cause? Nietzsche 2 (talk) 14:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 
Talk:Laguncularia racemosa

message: We should try to find the Minimum Temperature tolerated by this L. racemosa. Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moadeeb (talk • contribs) 15:51, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minimum Temperature 
Talk:Strangles

message: The one-in-ten mortality rate seems kinda high. At my old job I treated around 80 horses, and never had one die.  Though the first time I scrubbed down that burst abscess I was pretty sure I was going to die from gagging. StSkunko 04:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I will try and find a citable source for mortality rate, and alter the article accordingly. Alsiola vet (talk) 04:46, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also agree - and have found a citation for a more realistic sounding mortality rate. --RE73 (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

text: I agree.  Shipping fever should not redirect to Strangles.  I've switched the link on the redirect page to Pneumonia (non-human) for now.  Shipping fever probably deserves its own page though.   Getwood (talk) 01:26, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to this the incubation period of strangles is approximately a fortnight.  However, new outbreaks can occur up to three weeks or more after the initial outbreak as infected horses can shed the bacterium for long periods.
Any other literature to confirm this - or is this a reliable enough source ?? EdwardLane (talk) 19:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incubation period 

message: S. equi is actually S. equi subsp. equi (affects only horses) and shares 80% of the genome with S. equi subsp. zooepidemicus which can cause infections in other animals and, rarely, humans. So, the redirection from S. equi to this (Strangles) should be extended to offer a link the other pathogen, as well. --SCIdude (talk) 13:48, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not only horses
Talk:Terminalia chebula

message: configuration of terminalia chebula  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.185.1.4 (talk) 21:40, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  hello 

message: Was referred to as Black Myrobalan but both Monier-Williams Dictionary (sv. हरीतकी) and the Pali Text Society Dictionary (sv. harītaka) refer to this as the yellow myrobalan. These are not horticultural refs but they are usually quite reliable on these matters. Jayarava 12:59, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black or Yellow 

message: These two articles both have the same 3 photos 
under the Gallery section.(tree trunk, hanging 
fruit, and fallen fruit).
Which one is correct?
Terminalia bellirica
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bibhitaki
Terminalia chebula
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haritaki
Truthseekermon (talk) 03:37, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  SAME PHOTOS 

message: Can someone clarify what the description "nut-like fruits" is meant to mean? In everyday experience, the fruits and nuts familiar to most people aren't similar to each other, and other sources compared the fruit of this tree to a plum, which isn't nut-like in any obvious way.
RCTodd (talk) 17:33, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Nut-like fruits"
Talk:Ovson Egg

message: This is the start of a talk section of Ovson Egg.  If anyone has new informatation, please add to the talk page.  Thanks.  --Trust101 04:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: I disapprove linking this article to the category "Corporate Crime".  Yes, Morris pleaded guilty but he plea bargained with the prosecutor for a reduced sentence.  Second of all, Ovson Egg was a partnership until the partners were bought out, not a corporation.  Therefore, it is unfair to link this article to major corporations such as Enron, Exxon/Mobil, etc.  --Trust101 01:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Corporate crime

message: I radically revamped this article and Wikified it.  I also added inline citations, and some new references. I removed much of the biographical information about Ovson (that belongs in an article about him, not on this page), as well as much of the extra information about the criminal figures linked to Morris and Leo Ovson (that should go on each criminal's respective page, as it was not important to the Ovson bribery case).  I also did some general clean-up, clarified terms and the history, removed external links which were not directly about this article, and added new external links which are. - Tim1965 15:50, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revamp 

message: I put the information about H.J. Keith suing the United States Supreme Court in 1912 and referencing it.  This is important history in the frozen egg industry.  Had the Supreme Court rules against H.J. Keith, his company and the frozen egg industry would have been out of business and Ovson Egg wouldn't have been founded.
--Trust101 04:13, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supreme Court
Talk:Miconia crenata

message: I have just seen an early 20th century text discussing the plant's spread, where the name is given as "Köster" (suggesting a German, which ties in with much of the earliest Western settlement of the Fijian archipelago being by Germans). Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 19:31, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Clarified (and the misattribution corrected to identify the coffee plantation owner in question) thanks to some sleuthing by a Hawaiian biological survey in 2013.  Appropriately, as the original misidentification of the plant with Köster was done by an entomologist of the Hawaii Sugar Planters’ Association in 1906. – SJ + 00:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: But who was "Koster"?

message: This genus should be moved to Miconia crenata. Clidemia has been synonymized. 
https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26549481.pdf?casa_token=3GA2uX4MthQAAAAA:6RjYJeOikbBiExB92pDHO8ypoE1B2S74C-j1QNbpL4W12t5O1hGmSTHN-vcVXDiJXG7lamxxYvAMjnxaSS2nObuCGN9w2hH4oWmkssJKb2MttssUdn0
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Frank-Almeda/publication/328296497_Nomenclatural_novelties_in_Miconia_Melastomataceae_Miconieae/links/5bccbc3f458515f7d9cf1eca/Nomenclatural-novelties-in-Miconia-Melastomataceae-Miconieae.pdf
Wasp32 (talk) 03:52, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Miconia