lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Today's Man

message: I've tagged this with copy-vio, much of the text is a copy-paste from http://www.fundinguniverse.com/company-histories/Todays-Man-Inc-Company-History.html, altho there has been minor editing. Yngvarr 12:50, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You might want to put template:hangon to override the CSD, as well as a template:inuse so that people will know you're actively working on it. Yngvarr 12:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

text: Nevermind, you already addressed it. Yngvarr 12:55, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Someone else prod-ed this, but it was removed. I've since tagged it with template:Essay-like, as it mostly reads still like personal reminiscence (I used to buy all my clothes, I understand that during, to cite a few). The creator of the article was fairly responsive to my earlier pokes and nudges, but it's petered out. The store probably has notability (and significance), but the article as written needs some more TLC. I'm afraid if I were to address my concerns you'd simply end up with a stub (yea, that's a cop-out for not cleaning it up myself). Yngvarr 19:33, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Wife acceptance factor

message: Never heard of this before. Also, remember Wikipedias policy when it comes to original research Mvikjord (talk) 10:48, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

message: I stumbled upon this article and felt really surprised it's here on Wikipedia. It feels like a bad joke from 15 years ago, and after reading the talk history, maybe that's exactly what it is. Deletion hasn't been considered for 10 years. I do not believe it meets criteria for notability. Additionally, the underlying 'factor' is plainly sexist. 207.229.172.29 (talk) 04:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  This is not like any other article on Wikipedia that discusses people or events or objects;  it’s just an opinion.  Maybe it can go in Urban Dictionary or a historic catalogue of humour and hot takes.  How do we vote for deletion? Whophd (talk) 15:36, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree that it's not a good article. However, looks like the article survived a deletion discussion within the past year (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wife acceptance factor), so it doesn't seem helpful to try again at deletion. Seems more effective to add context to the article about the history of the idea of "WAF" and criticism of it. I added a bit, but it could use a lot more. Dreamyshade (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: 2022 proposed deletion
Talk:Daisy Belle

message: Tonywalton Talk 13:12, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

message: :There's now a photo. 86.129.66.234 (talk) 08:59, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A new infobox  has been created for chicken articles.  If you see anywhere it needs improved please contact User:Stepshep.  If it meets your criteria it is requested you add it to this article's page for standardization. Thanks! §hep  •  ¡Talk to me! 17:02, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chickenbreed Infobox
Talk:3rd Alpine Division "Julia"

message: Hello,
I think there may be an error on this page and would like to discuss some of the sources used with regards to the Nappina colors of the various battalion's. In Giacomo Fatuzzo's memoirs, Death of the Julia Division he recounts and incident with an Alpino of the Tolmezzo battalion and specifically states the "White Tassel" on the Tolmezzo's cappello. 
  "Suddenly, we hear shouting: "Tolmezzo! Tolmezzo!" What is It? Some men have seen an Alpino with the white tassel of the Tolmezzo Battalion appear from above, from the thick woods on the slopes of Mount Smolikas, heading towards the Vjose River. "Call him!" I order. "Hey, Tolmezzo!" (p.61, Fatuzzo 2014)
Regards,
Spitfire740 (talk) 22:48, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nappina colors
Talk:Canteen Stores Department (India)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 22:39, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Derek Vinyard

message: Frankly I Found this movie to be quite disturbing...but in a good, weird twisted way.
That's okay, but this is not a movie discussion forum.
65.12.134.148 (talk) 03:20, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

message: This should be Merged into American History X.
-65.12.134.148 (talk) 03:21, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Abdullah Atalar

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.meteksan.com/en/human-resources/who-is-who. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Theleftorium (talk) 19:35, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Jeish Muhammad

message: The agent reports (Extract 25) that The Army of Muhammad is
working with Osama bin Laden.
Information available to us (Iraq 2001 IIS) is that the group is under the wings of bin
Laden. They receive their directions from Yemen. Their objectives are the same as bin Laden.
http://a.abcnews.com/images/pdf/Pentagon_Report_V1.pdf  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.87.137.28 (talk) 02:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Talk:National Socialist Patriotic Organisation

message: The organization's correct name is Hellenic Socialist Patriotic Organization, not National-Socialist Patriotic Organization. See the sources (english and greek): https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=K4urAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA242&lpg=PA242&dq=#v=onepage&q&f=false https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=vWcSEraEJHYC&pg=PA9&lpg=PA9&dq#v=onepage&q&f=falsehttps://books.google.com.tr/books?id=wulFAQAAIAAJ&q=%CE%B5%CF%83%CF%80%CE%BF+%CE%B5%CE%BB%CE%BB%CE%B7%CE%BD%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE+%CF%83%CE%BF%CF%83%CE%B9%CE%B1%CE%BB%CE%B9%CF%83%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE&dq=%CE%B5%CF%83%CF%80%CE%BF+%CE%B5%CE%BB%CE%BB%CE%B7%CE%BD%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE+%CF%83%CE%BF%CF%83%CE%B9%CE%B1%CE%BB%CE%B9%CF%83%CF%84%CE%B9%CE%BA%CE%AE&hl=el&sa=X&ei=OaknVfbSJovKaPy6gNgN&ved=0CB4Q6AEwAQ  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ανδρέας Κρυστάλλης (talk • contribs) 10:52, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hellenic Socialist, ''not'' National-Socialist
Talk:America's Army/Archive 4

message: *Officially the Army neither admits its recruitment or propaganda
*next to propaganda its also a recruitment tool
*I think "so-called" shouldn't be removed in the beginning of the "Game Play" paragraph. There's a difference between US Army in reality and US Army in the game. "So-called" would make clear that the game describes it like that and introduces a paragraph in which words such as "kill" or "injury" could be wrongfully interpreted if the reader doesn't understand virtual reality (this game) is described as reality. 
**it's about America's Army. Do you see CS portraying the "so-called GIGN"? Wareware 03:01, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Look up the word mediocre in the dictionary. I will even post it here for you - Moderate to inferior in quality; ordinary. How is Americas Army's gameplay inferior and to what is it inferior to? Subliminal slice - Google this term and all I get is 1 result. Using it to describe propaganda doesn't make much sense and it should be removed. I also disagree with your gameplay edits but someone else can argue those. - Grover9 16:33, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Reasons for changes

message: 1) The opposing team is officially called "OPFOR".68.32.176.48 
"OPFOR" is still a word that is not used in normal English. It is not "generally known" as that. It is called like that by the army, it is actually army lingo. That needs to be made clear. 
"in certain situations specifically". On most maps you will find these describtion (terrorsits, insurgents), usually in the map descriptions. They're a denouncement and should give the player a political reason to kill them.
The "OPFOR" team is referred to as "enemy", "terrorist forces" and "insurgents".
The game describes the OPFOR as all of them. When they're described as "terrorist forces", they have the same model as an OPFOR on another map, which would then be referred to as "insurgent". This is smart. Describing insurgent=terrorist with the media all day telling about the insurgents in Iraq...See terrorist145.254.135.222 00:12, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons for my edits
Talk:S. Ve. Shekher

message: This page has been moved around as different people have different views on how to abbreviate his name - please consult here before making any fresh moves. User:Ravichandar84 made a cut-and paste move from S. V. Shekhar to S. Ve. Shekher in May 2011. There was a parallel article at S. Ve. Sheker until June 2008 - it was lengthy but almost entirely unreferenced, there may be something in the final diff that is worth pursuing.FlagSteward (talk) 17:12, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: Prabatki (talk) 04:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.  —  IVORK Discuss 04:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 9 May 2018
Talk:Pentosidine

message: I've removed the plagiarism note from the page for two reasons-
*There was no clearer and/or shorter way to state the same information, and so the wording would be the same.
*Its been included as a reference and as such I don't think there should be a problem with keeping the info in.
:Happy editing,xC | ☎  14:54, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism
Talk:Kendals

message: Kendals in Manchester is the largest department store, trading space wise, but not building wise. The title would of gone too Lewis's Liverpool (500,000 sq ft.) or Lewis's Manchester (now Primark) (513,000 sq ft.) had they used all the trading space in the store. Im not too sure on Debenhams though.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.19.56 (talk) 18:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm not sure that a former name of a department store is really a suitable subject for an article.  I think the article should be about the department store, not about one of several names that it has had.  And as a consequence, given that the store is currently trading, I think the only sensible title for the article is the current name of the store.  (Though if the store were to close, IMHO there might be a case to be made to use the name the store was best known as, even if that wasn't the name when it closed.)
I therefore propose:
* The article should be renamed to 'House of Fraser Manchester', although the name 'Kendals' should still be mentioned in the lead.
* Kendals should of course redirect here
Comments?
And on further reflection: The article as it stands clearly is about the store and not the name, lead notwithstanding.  The pretence in the lead that it is about the name Kendals is presumably just an attempt to avoid renaming it.  Having grown up in the area, visiting Kendals is a childhood memory for me - but much as it pains me to do so I think we need to rename. [Or merge with House of Fraser.  But for now I'm just proposing rename.]
Roybadami (talk) 18:28, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems with article
Talk:Gairatganj

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 11:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Garhakota

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Garhi-Malhara

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Garoth

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Meadow's law

message: Removed the following unreferenced original research from the article:  
The ‘law’ seems in Britain to have been adopted literally and urged by police and childcare workers — individuals with no training in paediatrics — who have acquired the habit of deferring to medical opinion as the immutable foundation for their actions, even though they don't fully understand what that opinion is. It appears that some child protection workers have applied the Meadow hypothesis as dogma, without its ever having been formally elaborated or defended. Another fact is that the prosecutions in which Meadow’s views played a role were often covered for the popular press by hardbitten crime reporters rather than by thoughtful journalists, and this may have had some effect in establishing the precept.
-- 192.250.34.161 (talk) 15:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Ghansor

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:32, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Hall City, Florida

message: It seems that this article is more about George Hall than Hall City. Maybe time to move that to a seperate article? Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 15:05, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support it ifn they are notable enough to have articles. RJFJR (talk) 19:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rev. George F. Hall
Talk:Ghuwara

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Master Hilarion

message: This article was "redirected" to another article in order to make it disappear from Wikipedia. It was done without discussion or consensus. I fail to see how this behavior is not a flagrant violation of the rules of Wikipedia. Arion (talk) 15:06, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Improper redirect

message: This site is the personally registered site of Anand Gholap of Pune, India. He has a disclaimer that he is not responsible for the use of anything on his site (http://www.anandgholap.net/Terms_Of_Use.htm). He makes no special claims of expertise or any affiliation. A number of texts and images from books are on his site but copyright status is uncertain as he does not have specific permission to make these public domain but has added these on the basis of his understanding of copyright law which is not the same as Wikipedia's. His site fails WP:RS and WP:ELNO and should not be used as a reference or link for any article apart from (possibly) an article about himself.—Ash (talk) 22:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using anandgholap.net as a source or link 

message: This article of a possibly non-notable charlatan doesn't seem to meet the criteria for factual content on Wikipedia. Scattered at best. --Jobrot (talk) 03:30, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  deletion under WP:PROMO
Talk:HMS Feversham (1696)

message: See "sir Richard Hughes" Bio on DNB "In 1739 Hughes was entered at the Royal Academy at Portsmouth, and three years later joined the Feversham, commanded by his father. On 1 April 1745, while acting lieutenant of the Burford in the Mediterranean, he passed his examination, and was declared in the certificate to be 'upwards of 21. The next day he was promoted by Vice-admiral Rowley to be lieutenant of the Stirling Castle, and ... Victuallers (talk) 20:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Godarpura

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:33, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Gojra

message: The coordinates and location on the map is wrong. Gojra is located between Faisalabad and Toba Tek Singh, not near Kashmir. yasirniazkhan (talk) 08:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am listing the problems with the section titled "Eye surgery", that has been added multiple times:
* There are three sources in this section:
:# this one fails verification besides it is not a reliable source
:# This doesn't say what it is cited for, again failed verification
:# This is not a reliable source, besides it is a copy of this Wikipedia article, so it fails on to accounts
* So precisely the text in this section is not supported by a reliable secondary source, besides it also don't confirm to Neutral Point of View policy being written in a promotional tone.
I am removing this content because it violates three important content policies (WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:PROMOTION) and suggest editors adding this content to discuss at this talk page before adding it again. --SMS  Talk 16:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Promotional Content 
Talk:Gormi

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:34, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Govindgarh, Madhya Pradesh

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Gun Carriage Factory Jabalpur

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:35, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition
Talk:Dipalpur

message: "Sadly, our Archaeology Department is neither very keen to discover the missing links of human evolution in this area nor in preservation of bits and pieces of history lying under the layers of time. Challenge of restoring the ancient Dipalpur to its old magnificence might be too much, but the experts could carry out a survey to record the places having essential, historic, social and architectural value."
:I have moved the above commentary from the article itself to the talk page
:Pahari Sahib, 03:29, 18 December 2007 (GMT)
Editor by ZeeShii  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.59.19.142 (talk) 12:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

message: Urdu 39.42.118.3 (talk) 09:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depalpur
Talk:Smoking ceremony

message: In the 'Ceremonial Practice' section the same source is cited four times. Are there other sources which corroborate this information? Kat7502 (talk) 23:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Certainly not mentioned by Buckley, Morril or Petrie.  The latter goes into fine detail about ceremonies by Brisbane tribes.
I suspect this only happened in a small number of places, if at all.  Modern accounts are dubious at best. I seems like a modern invention.  Tuntable (talk) 23:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do we have any early accounts of this?
Talk:Gwarighat

message: with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article   --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 12:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition