Talk:Primary sclerosing cholangitis

message: In the introduction, a study is cited "...and more than 80% of those with PSC have ulcerative colitis.[2]", whereas in the section Related diseases, "...and approximately 70% of people with primary sclerosing cholangitis have ulcerative colitis.[3]".  While I am not familiar with the cited work, there is an obvious inconsistency here.--Nocturnalnectar (talk) 10:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Related diseases

message: 80.139.115.208, you put more stuff into the intro. That's fine, but do keep in mind that everything you added is covered (in lay terms) later on in the article. I generally avoid discussions on the mechanisms of diseases in the intros, as many are still speculative. JFW | T@lk 22:51, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Anon

message: Adding the PSC-Support group link back.  Is there a specific reason for it's deletion previously?  Do you dislike the site itself, or do you see a problem of some sort with the description?  Just FYI it's not a commercial site (that is it's on yahoo, but the group itself doesn't try to sell anything), and it is more directly related to PSC than some other links that you've left.  I did try to follow guidelines for adding the link, but I am a newbie here so if I did something wrong let me know and I'll try to fix it!
:You didn't do anything wrong but I suspect the link may not be suitable. Yahoo groups (and any unauthoratitive online resource) are poor candidates for linking as per WP:EL. If you think the remaining links are not suitable, please point out which ones. JFW | T@lk 22:43, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: PSC support

message: A very large case series from Germany:  JFW | T@lk 16:57, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Case series 

message: added a single study that looked at the epidemiology of PSC. I suggested that a secondary source be used because a single study might skew the results depending on the population. Mikael then returned exactly the same data but with a source supporting its existence! This is not what I meant. The source (well done for finding it) also gives data from a Spanish study that strongly conflicts with the Norwegian data. I have now fully removed the Norwegian source and just cited everything to the Feld 2003 paper. It is available freely online. It might also be a useful source for some other content, such as disease associations. JFW | T@lk 11:47, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your improvement. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:09, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Epidemiology 

message: The section on antibodies states:
:Approximately 80% of patients have perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, also called anti mitochondrial;
I was under the impression that ANCA and AMA were different, and in fact the page on ANCA doesn't mention anything about AMA, and vice versa, so I suspect this is wrong. Also, AMA is specific for primary biliary cholangiitis, which obviously is a different disease. I'm fairly sure this is the case. 82.47.78.34 (talk) 07:29, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antibody types 

message: doi:10.1056/NEJMra1506330 JFW | T@lk 08:21, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEJM review 

message: doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30300-3 JFW | T@lk 21:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lancet seminar