lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:News.com.au

message: Seriously? Maybe it's not vandalism, but it certainly doesn't meet the content requirements for it to be included in the article. The claims about the site being 'Pro SSM' and 'anti-Trump' are in clear disregard of WP:NPOV (and this primary source is not a citation for these claims but a rather the basis for the editor's opinion – it looks a lot like original research). MediaBias/FactCheck and HonestReporting are not reliable sources for making a blanket statement that the site is politically biased. Kb.au (talk) 15:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political bias 

message: I made an edit stating that the site has in recent years moved towards tabloid style journalism by increasingly reporting about social media occurrences and reproducing articles from tabloids like the Sun in the UK. It was removed because I hadn’t cited a source…but the source is my direct observation of the decline in standards of the website. Any idea how to reference something like that?!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.186.82.186 (talk) 12:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved this to a new section at the bottom of the page.To answer your question, if that analysis hasn't been published by anyone then we can't put it in the page, because Wikipedia has a policy against adding original research (which includes your own analysis of things and your original conclusions derived from other analyses). See: WP:NOR. – 2804:F14:C060:8A01:34B1:F4B0:5089:8239 (talk) 12:29, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: And WP:SYNTH as well. I second 2804's comment. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, the syndicated sun content may need a mention on WP:RSN if it hasn't been discussed there already. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:59, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I made an edit stating that the site has in recent years moved towards tabloid style journalism... 

message: What will it take as a source to not be considered original research? Here and and here characterize the site as being terrible journalism. They are objectively sensationalist and essentially a mill of clickbait and tabloids articles about how much cleavage some celebrity is showing or how there's some shopping hack going around that "you won't believe!" Thornfield Hall (talk) 09:40, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: News quality again
Talk:Attachmate

message: See: Hawn and hired hands shot and killed 32 bison—including cows carrying calves—which had wandered onto and near his property from a neighboring ranch in Park County, Colorado. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.199.10.82 (talk) 13:28, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo? 

message: Attachmate and AttachmateWRQ are basically the same entity, just a larger after the merger. Bdelisle 03:19, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  AttachmateWRQ 

message: This article reads like a commercial. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.114.79 (talk) 13:26, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads Like Commercial 

message: Maybe forward visitors from Attachmate Corporation to this article. --82.171.70.54 (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion; Forwarding 

message: Ars Technica reports that "Novell has sold over 800 patents for $450 million to a consortium of technology companies organized by Microsoft."
http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/11/novell-acquired-by-attachmate-sells-some-assets-to-microsoft.ars
Actually, after reading the boston.com article, I see that they agree with me, but they do say it with bigger words...
Novell also said it has entered into an agreement for the concurrent sale of certain intellectual property assets to CPTN Holdings LLC, a consortium of technology companies organized by Microsoft Corp., for $450 million in cash, "which cash payment is reflected in the merger consideration to be paid by Attachmate Corp.," a company press release said.
I'm just a casual visitor wondering who Attachmate is so I won't edit a currently hot topic but this should be fixed. 173.184.67.52 (talk) 23:18, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attachmate is selling patents? 

message: Cut this from article:
"It is the largest privately owned software company in Washington (U.S. state)."
By what measure can Attachmate be the largest software company in the state that is home Microsoft? --83.89.0.118 (talk) 17:58, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Did you miss the part about "privately owned". Microsoft is publicly owned. 61.25.199.225 (talk) 00:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest? 

message: Ok, it's not a source containing information useful to the page.
But it is an interesting link about Attachmate.
--85.159.196.230 (talk) 14:07, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting link
Talk:Methods of virtual reality

message: This page is a good start.  The main VR page is a little too cluttered right now in places, and some of that content might be a better fit here.  A lot of the external links there are vendor links, and they are being moved here because there is a more direct link between VR implementations (referred to here as methods) and vendor services. My suggestion is that this page be grown into an "applied" article on VR with the main article dealing more with topic at a high level.  -- Dx 03:19, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Good Start
Talk:The Italian Bob

message: It's Sunday the 11'th, and the overview is out ALREADY
GO,Wikipedia, go! The Italian Bob was a funny one.
Nice touch on the back-link to the Family Guy. I don't think of it as a nasty, dig, though- much more a salute through humor.
Doesn't Gino look an awful lot like Chucky?- JustPhil 17:25, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Homer was not parodyng Donald Trump, but Benito Mussolini, in some of his typical gestures!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.51.174.183 (talk) 14:44, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Donald Trump???

message: Does McDonald's serve alcohol or not? Stephenchou0722 23:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No --OZOO (What?) 08:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: McDonald's

message: I just watched a Czech-dubbed version of this episode and noticed that the descriptions in that book are different:
*Invasione di casa
*Drinko drive-o
*Plagiarismo 
*Plagiarismo di plagiarismo
*Omicidio attentato multiplo
(note that in Italian only the first word is capitalized)
Also the name of the book uses different spelling. Can anyone check whether the original run used the descriptions written on the page? ‒StenSoft (talk) 00:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Criminali Americani 

message: Mortadella is NOT a cheese, it's a sausage.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.243.208.68 (talk) 17:04, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mortadella
Talk:The Blue Streak (Newspaper)

message: Staff list is old.  Can someone on the staff (i.e. Chevronine) correct the entry?--R6MaY89 03:21, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

message: FCYTravis recommended that this article be merged with Charter School of Wilmington.  I think this is a good idea as there is not much content and the Newspaper is directly related to the school.  Any ideas?--R6MaY89 04:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's begging for a VfD otherwise. --68.44.212.180 01:22, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree completely.  I went ahead and merged it in. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 01:39, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Recommendation
Talk:Neutron detection

message: My interest in neutron detection comes from my summer and semester research (still ongoing) at Jefferson Lab. I am doing research in developing methods for better detection analysis. Just thought I should share something I know of the general approach, since nothing had been said about it before.
(KunalKathuria 03:27, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The Topic

message: For anyone watching this article, I advise looking at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theory, Design and Calibration of a BF3 Tube Neutron Detector.  Theory, Design and Calibration of a BF3 Tube Neutron Detector is a recently created but now abandonned article which at the least needs cleanup and whose notability is hard to assess. --EMS | Talk 18:53, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related AfD 

message: This article describes one setup in considerable detail. How applicable is it to neutron detection in general? Sho Uemura 03:08, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Relevance?

message: Neutron detection is not necessarily used at any other facility where criticality might occur - most Criticality Incident Detection Systems (CIDS) only detect the associated gamma pulse. 
Detection of fast neutrons is a challenge - they tend not to stop in the detector until you slow them down a bit. Rogerthebadger 21:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy

message: How about a right toc at the very top of the page? Emesee (talk) 21:59, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right TOC
Talk:Z Channel

message: Rather than "some", this list appears to be "every" notable film shown on the Z Channel. Is there any criteria for inclusion? Are there any sources? Can we create a narrower criteria, like films that had their cable premiere on Z? If we can't, I suggest we delete the entire list.   Will Beback  talk   01:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, this is an exhaustive list of minutae that would be more appropriate on an independent fansite. Rather than let the article remain in such a state, I've gone ahead and deleted the entire list. That link also serves as a backup of the titles mentioned, if another editor really feels that a section like this is necessary and has the time and energy required to make sure it's adequately sourced and limited. Badger Drink (talk) 03:03, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some notable films shown on Z Channel
Talk:Non-Muslim interactants with Muslims during Muhammad's era

message: More detail on the significance of these people on the development of Islam, the context etc.
A reference to Interfaith relations perhaps?
Jackiespeel 18:29, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a list page, so I would say in generally, no, the information should be short and sweet. See Islam and the individual's own pages for detail. NicM 18:36, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions for expansion

message: Sources are needed for assertions such as "Muslim historians have kept detailed lists of people who interacted with Muslims during Muhammad's era."  Which historians, and where were their lists published, and does this article use those lists as references? Esquizombi 16:44, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: possibly Non-Muslim interactants with Sahabas --Striver 00:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: rename

message: Per WP:V I removed a large body of unreferenced text from the article and placed it below.  I used a segment from the top of Sahaba to round out the introduction. 
Begin copy and paste
Muslim historians have kept detailed lists of people who interacted with Muslims during Muhammad's era, they are called the Sahaba. These lists usually consist of people who accomplished something notable in the view of Muslims, or who interacted with someone that did so. For example there is a list of every single Muslim who died during the first Muslim war for independence, the battle of Badr.
At the same time, they also kept a similarly detailed list of notable non-Muslim interactants with Muslims during Muhammad's era, both friend and enemies. This includes for example the notable people from the city of Mecca that went to war with Muslims, and also non-Muslims from other parts of the Arabian peninsula. It also includes non-Muslim non-Arabs, for example Romans that fought with Muslims or the Ethiopians who helped the Muslims that emigrated there.
Just as the Muslim casualties of the battle of Badr are accounted for, so are many prominent non-Muslims that died during that and other battles.
This is a list of notable non-Muslims that had contact with the Sahaba, arranged by country or place of origin.
End copy and paste
Signed Jeepday (talk) 13:45, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove unreferenced text from article
Talk:Bad Day L.A.

message: we should state the levels in the game insted of mentioning them in the weapons section  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.49.62.75 (talk) 01:47, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Levels 

message: Enlight no longer consider this one of their games. It's no longer on their website, period. Not even as "older game". As thus, I've removed the official site link. Strangely, American McGee's newer game, Scrapland, is still there. --Kschang77 18:45, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed official site 

message: I've never played this, but does it count as a game in the Disaster Genre, like (predictable titles coming up) Disaster: Day Of Crisis or Disaster Report? JaffaCakeLover (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disaster game? 

message: Why is the Chinese title there? I mean, plenty of games and films have different titles in different languages, and WP convention is to display the original language title of the film or game if the game was originally not in English. What does BDLA have to do with China? Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 09:57, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it's because the game was developed in the People's Republic of China, or at least the software house that developed it is based there. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hong Kong, specifically, although American McGee apparently now lives in Shanghai. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 17:20, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese title?
Talk:Rule of thirds

message: While viewing this article on a phone, this causes the first photo to be displayed at the top of the page. This means that the second paragraph might cause confusion as it says that the photo is to the right. If anyone has any ideas on how to fix this then I would be glad hear it out. Omnipotentunknown00 (talk) 00:46, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Being this page on mobile devices 

message: I think we should find 1) someone with reasonable authority / expertise making that claim, and 2) someone else pointing out that the also-common-among-experts view that there really is no such rule but off-center composition is generally more dynamic, and this really has nothing to do with thirds at all, so saying that "the rule applies" is rather dubious. Matthew Miller (talk) 21:25, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Then find someone, but we all know the rule is that rules are meant to be broken, including this one. TheScotch (talk) 01:00, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  not satisfied with the "good enough so the rule applies" bit in the intro
Talk:Lon Morris College

message: This article as a whole needs to be rewritten to where it's more detailed and drop the incident about the grade....there's no need for it here and overwhelms the article. --Stdjsb25 04:16, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Info about history is in Handbook: http://beabearcat.com/documents/2010stuhandbook.pdf - http://www.webcitation.org/67tDMUYOn
WhisperToMe (talk) 02:56, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Handbook
Wikipedia talk:Press

message: Should this page be permanently protected and only editable by administrators? --HappyCamper 20:48, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been done – Qxz 19:04, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page protection 

message: Replace  with . Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done ~  Amory (u • t • c) 17:42, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: On second (or third) thought, I've just done away with it all.  WP:PRESS doesn't point here and it's not a dab, it was just masquerading as a soft redirect. ~  Amory (u • t • c) 17:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update page please 

message: Redirect was listed for discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 3 and should be tagged. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:25, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: DatGuyTalkContribs 17:05, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 3 December 2022 

message: Retarget to Wikipedia:Press coverage per the RfD. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:42, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 20 December 2022
Talk:Zamanfou

message: I read this article, and still don't know what Zamanfou means. I think the article needs some improvement (or I am a malakas)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.74.89.62 (talk) 22:19, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I recall that there were sources from works of Nikos Dimou in this article. Why have they been removed? Is it because a person like Nikos Dimou isn't considered a verifiable source by the guidelines of Wikipedia, or is it because most Greek people hate him because of his works? I'm certain that all people who yell against this article are also haters of Nikos Dimou, but is there any serious reason why sources have been removed? Thank you... 85.74.119.191 15:02, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The humorous, unencyclopaedic style of writing in Wikipedia is not acceptable. The article has been rewritten in an encyclopaedic style, removing inappropriate humor. This resulted in the removal of sections that do not meet the notability standards of Wikipedia as well as sections that are purely intended as humorous. Please refer to the aformentioned guidelines for more information. There is no "hate" or any other type of discrimination against editors, only the credibility of a source. Sources cited as references of purely humorous, uninformative, unencyclopaedic content will be removed along with the content. If you think I'm mistaken, be bold and undo my edits, re-adding the sources where appropriate. However, please make sure the content added adheres to Wikipedia's style guidelines. Thank you --dionyziz (talk) 11:14, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources removed? 

message: The article is based on an anonymous person's blog. Please rewrite the article or remove it.--Dipa1965 (talk) 11:20, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-publishing source 

message: How the hell is Frappe a symbol for Zamanfou??? This really needs explanation!! 亮HH (talk) 11:39, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it. Greek article is of pure quality too.--Dipa1965 (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frappe 

message: J'aime un fou.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:587:410B:4370:5C66:2D7C:B21E:2860 (talk) 17:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Pun]]
Talk:Georg Wilhelm Richmann

message: First off, Benjamin Franklin proved that lightning was electricity a year before, in 1752. 
And Franklin succeeded, and wasn't killed, because he took precautions based on the earlier deaths of, I seem to recall, one or more French scientists seeking to prove the same thing. So, others died before Richmann. 2601:181:4600:A8C0:0:0:0:FE4C (talk) 00:29, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs serious revision 

message: I think it would be a good idea to include that Richmann was attempting to duplicate a Benjamin Franklin experiment that the American inventor and political figure had suggested.
Of course, this is the cause of Richmann's death as an insulated rod attracts lightning due to build up of charge on the insulation of the platform. Although that would be original research as I don't know a primary source dealing with this known principle and applying it to the Sentry Box experiment. MichaelJPierce (talk) 14:43, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Benjamin Franklin Sentry Box Experiment
Talk:Ivan II of Moscow

message: I've heard Ivan II described as "Ivan the Red". Mistake here?  Trekphiler 04:31, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the same mistake as in Red Square. The word "krasnyi" stood for "handsome" at those times. --Ghirlandajo 07:29, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - and not "Красивый" but "Красный"  -  "Красный" has two meanings - "red" and "beauty". In contemporary Russian people say rather "Красивый" for "beauty" - but "Красный" is still in use in poetry and literature. Anyway - the official name of Ivan II in all textbooks is "Красный" not "Красивый". See for example .Polimerek (talk) 11:21, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk
Talk:Inosine

message: Does inosine really base-pair to guanine? It seems highly unlikely that it could, compared to cytosine, adenine, and uracil. I'm unsure though. 
Can anyone confirm this reference to see if it is right? 
http://www.web-books.com/MoBio/Free/Ch5C4.htm
Molecular Biology of the Cell 4th edition (Alberts et al.) confirms it (fig 6-53)
I pairs to U,C,A in bacteria and to U,C in eukaryotes--131.111.8.99 13:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Base pairing of inosine?
Talk:Denis Florence MacCarthy

message: According to some sources, MacCarthy's translation of La Aurora en Copacabana was completed shortly before his death.  I have been unable to determine if it was ever published.  If anyone knows, please post a reply below. — Eoghanacht talk 21:41, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Publication of ''Daybreak at Capacabana''?

message: I noticed that someone put a photo request banner on this talk page.  I have (or seen) several books by D.F. MacCarthy, but their is no "photograph of the author" in any of them.  If anyone has access to another source for a photo (libraries/universities in Ireland?) please see what you can find. — Eoghanacht talk 15:25, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph please 
Talk:Newton OS

message: This page - Dock (computing) - makes reference to the OS X Dock acting like the Newton OS dock, and links here. But there's no discussion of this feature. Could someone add one? David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 18:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Description of Newton OS dock

message: Hi.  I accidentally overwrote the logo image with a different one.  I believe that administrators have a way to restore these.  If so how do we invoke an administrator to do so?  If not please let me know on my talk page and I'll hunt down an Apple Newton OS logo to undo the damage I just did.  Thanks.  Wikidemo 21:58, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halp!  I just overwrote the logo 
Talk:Apple GS/OS

message: Personally, i'm impressed with GS/OS. Making a operating system Incredibly like macintosh With weaker hardware...GS/OS Won't get dysentary. Maiq the liar (talk) 21:08, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woah! 

message: The ‘screenshot’ has been doctored. The colours (except black and white) weren't solid, but made by vertical lines of colour. For example the blue background was alternating vertical lines blue and white.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.81.0 (talk) 23:54, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Latest release was in 93, and when was first release?.. Is there some timeline of OSes developed by Apple? 178.92.205.103 (talk) 15:30, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, in Polski Wikipedia it is 1988, without date.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.92.205.103 (talk) 15:34, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial Release 

message: There is indeed an update after 22 years. I think it should be mentioned somehow, but I don't know how this would fit into the article.
http://www.callapple.org/software/announcing-apple-iigs-system-6-0-2/
93.197.246.13 (talk) 13:35, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fresh update to 6.0.2 

message: I would love to hear some of the history of the development of this OS. When was it first planned? How late did it ship? Was it developed all in house? Who oversaw its development? What was the purpose or focus of its design? --Navstar (talk) 17:47, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  History?