lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Matt Smith (comics editor)

message: Hmm...
I suspect Matt Smith the artist is a  different person from Matt Smith the editor/writer. Artw 23:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I did suspect as much. I did a more extensive search and it appears the artist is one Matthew Smith from Albany, New York (spamblock won't let me post the link though) and might post to this blog . It might be worth starting Matthew Smith (artist) and move the bits and bobs over there. He is certainly notable enough having worked on Hellboy and The Keep (graphic novel), which points here, as does Sentinels of Magic. Seems the simplest fix and would help resolve quite a bit of confusion. It also means people who know more about him can jump in and expand it. If that seems good for you I'll do a quick tidy up and sort the new entry out. Actually I see there is a Matthew Smith (artist) so perhaps: Matthew Smith (comics artist)? Damn these popular names!! (Emperor 23:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  There's also a TV presenter and an actor called Matt Smith! Definitely a popular name! Digifiend (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artist? 

message: I've deleted a line about this Matt Smith being the only editor of British adult comics (specifically 2000AD and its spin-off Judge Dredd Magazine) as Viz is also a comic aimed at adults, so it simply wasn't true! Digifiend (talk) 01:22, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good eye there ;) Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:11, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Someone forgot about Viz 
Talk:Woluwe-Saint-Lambert

message: Between 23 December 2006 and 28 January 2007 there has been a survey about which names the articles for the municipalities in the Brussels region should have. The municipalities in question have different names in French and Dutch, the two official languages of the region. A majority of contributors to the survey prefers using one single same over using both names in the title. This single name should follow English usage, which has been determined using domain specific Google searches. 
The final result of the survey is that:
*for the following municipalities the French name has been chosen, in line with the most commonly used names in English:
**Auderghem 
**Forest, Belgium 
**Ixelles 
**Saint-Gilles, Belgium 
**Saint-Josse-ten-Noode 
**Schaerbeek 
**Uccle 
**Watermael-Boitsfort 
**Woluwe-Saint-Lambert 
**Woluwe-Saint-Pierre 
*for the following municipalities no significant preference in the English language has been found. After discussion, the Dutch names have been chosen:
**Sint-Jans-Molenbeek  
**Sint-Agatha-Berchem 
Details about the survey can be found at Talk:Brussels-Capital Region/NamingArchive3. Markussep 18:38, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Names survey, result

message: Sorry, nothing to do with any language preferences, but where the article name is already decided, this should be the 1st on the order of the 1st line. All respect to the Vlams name and history (I used to live happily in Zaventem), but it just looks illogical and wrong to have inconsistencies between the article name and Introduction. I think Talk:Brussels-Capital Region/NamingArchive3 applies here also. --83.170.113.250 (talk) 09:00, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 1st line
Talk:Licínio Rangel

message: Reverted last three edits.  Anonomous edit seems to have POV as far as I can tell.
Other two edits placed this person in dissident theologian category.  He apparently made a very public reconciliation so this seems debatable.   Gimmetrow 19:03, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "was a bishop of the Catholic Church from Campos, Brazil.
He was consecrated a bishop without papal mandate"
Since he there was no papal mandate he was never an offical bishop of the Catholic Church  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mach10 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bishop of the Catholic Church
Talk:Sibylla of Acerra

message: Why was the form "Emperor Henry VI" changed to "Henry VI, Holy Roman Emperor"? The former is far more readable and elegant in writing than the latter. For the same reason we would say "King Henry VI of Germany" and not "Henry VI, King of Germany." The latter also necessitates two commas, one before and one after the title. 
Secondly, why was the paragraph spilt up? The editor who made that edit tends to break up legitimate paragraphs into smaller and smaller ones. It is entirely unecessary. All the information concerns one event: the coming of Henry to Sicily. Srnec 19:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Why was
Talk:Noah Reid

message: Jag älskar dej!
:Väl! Tack! – AndyFielding (talk) 11:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Reid announced his engagement to former actress Clare Stone on December 31, 2018. They were married on July 25, 2020, and their first child, a son, was due in summer 2022.
Any updates on this? – AndyFielding (talk) 11:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son?
Talk:Cycling in Calgary

message: This article does not conform to Wikipedia's guidelines for neutral point of view. It reads more like a travel brochure than an encyclopedia article. —GrantNeufeld 19:13, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree: It needs a full re-write. --Arch26 23:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV check 

message: This article should really be merged with Sport in Calgary (but hopefully not before the NPOV issues are resolved). --Arch26 23:58, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Self-archiving

message: About 94% of peer-reviewed journals already endorse authors self-archiving  preprint and/or postprint versions of their papers.
The source does not appear reliable. Certainly in my field (History research in France) the reaction mentioned is very rare. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johncmullen1960 (talk • contribs) 
:One would think that eprints.org is a WP:RS for self archiving!  However, it could be phrased better: "About 91% of publishers surveyed...."
:They have a list of publishers with policies & a means for submitting corrections--there's no reason to eliminate useful information because you have a different gut feeling. --Karnesky 13:31, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I concur with Johncmullen1960; in my field (marketing) self-archiving does not appear to be widely practiced, let alone stimulated by publishers.  It makes me question if there is a (strong) selection bias in the publishers surveyed. 69.209.235.244 (talk) 19:11, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Extent of practice is very different from the what is given permission.  If you have a WP:RS with differing stats on either permission or actual use, add it. --Karnesky (talk) 20:29, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Also, the reference list of this article mainly appears to be a link-collection page for more or less two authors.  Is that the best way to use a reference section? 69.209.235.244 (talk) 19:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Percentage of Journals

message: Question: What happens when one publishes a paper with a journal that allows self-archiving and much later a new publisher takes over and changes the self-achiving policy? Is one bound by the policy under which one originally published or under the new publisher's policy? 203.213.45.238 (talk) 01:53, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question: What happens when a new publisher takes over?
Talk:Per se (phrase)

message: Could another direct translation be "as such." That is, in most cases 'per se' can be replaced with 'as such'. --Zikar 19:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Out of interest, how many time have you heard "It's not that singing 'happy birthday' is bad per se, it's just that you shouldn't have been singing it at the funeral" said? :P. Ck lostsword|queta! 15:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Common usage?
Talk:Tibbers Castle

message: Hello, I've prepared an re-draft of this article at User:Richard Nevell/sandbox. Since it mentions work of the Castle Studies Trust and I'm on the charity's board I would appreciate it if someone could have a look and check that the balance is ok. Then if everyone's happy I'd like to copy the contents over to this article. Richard Nevell (talk) 21:03, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  New draft
Talk:Dezo Hoffmann

message: the external link given in the article doesn't lead to anything. 
in case it's useful to someone as a source to cite, i have a book called The Rolling Stones: The Early Years, copyright 1984 by Dezo Hoffmann; McGraw-Hill Paperback edition 1985; first published in Great Britain by Vermilion & Company, an imprint of the Hutchinson Publishing Company, in 1984. .  the introduction states that Dezo Hoffmann worked (in Prague) as the clapper-boy for the Hedy Lamarr film Eroticon; in the mid-1930s he was a newsreel cameraman for 20th-Century-Fox, covering the invasion of Abyssinia and the Olympiad Popular in Barcelona, where he remained to cover the Spanish Civil War; he later joined the Czech army; and in 1940 arrived in England, where "the War Office quickly utilized his experience, sending him as a newsreel cameraman to all major theatres of war. After the war he joined the Crown film unit, but soon found more excitement and creative potential in press photography." 
hope that helps some. Sssoul (talk) 12:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sources 

message: i have a scan of a may 1963 Record Mirror article where one of Hoffmann's photos is captioned "by Bill Williams"; what other pseudonyms did he employ? Sssoul (talk) 12:00, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: pseudonyms

message: Simple google search shows that he used the Dezo Hoffmann form, he's called Dezider only in some Slovakian sources. That in itself decides in the question of his ethnicity as Dezső is the Hungarian name, but to avoid further discussions I will attempt to find a source when he talked about that. Anyway, I see no sense in why all the references were removed that he was Hungarian. (In fact, he was a Hungarian brought up in Slovakia as the borders changed in his childhood). Regards --Korovioff 19:23, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dezider Hoffmann, Dezo Hoffmann or Dežo Hoffmann

message: Why did the Beatles stop using Hoffman? 
The 1982 book and its quotes from Hoffman suggests that he quarrelled with Lennon, who thought Hoffman was ripping them off. But any photographer of celebrities might be accused of the same thing.
Another Beatles book ('Love me Do: the Beatles' Progress', Michael Braun, 1964, p. 63) hints that Hoffman's work became a little too 'middle of the road' for the band. This is where the quote about 'Greatest photographer in the world' comes from; McCartney was explaining that their attitude to Hoffman as a photographer had changed since they first started using him, when they were new to celebrity and publicity, and thought he was the best. But they had learned a lot since then. 
In time, the Fab Four pushed even George Martin aside and produced their own recordings. 2001:44B8:3102:BB00:8EB:459C:C5EA:1CB (talk) 23:01, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dethroned!
Talk:Meez

message: Hello.  I appreciate feedback on the Meez page I recently submitted, but need help understanding why it doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards.  I've tried to emulate the pages for several other services that are similar to Meez (IMVU, Habbo Hotel for example).  I don't see how the Meez content is different -- other than I haven't added visuals yet.  Maybe someone can help?
The main problem with this aritcle is that it doesn't pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines for websites (see WP:WEB).  Some Google research tells me that it's only been available for a few months.  The other sites you mention have been around for longer than that.  There also isn't that much objective information available about Meez- most of it is small blog posts or official press releases.  There is a Forbes article about it, which may indeed make this site notable enough, as long as the article actually references that article.  
Beyond that, it would be best if the article discusses why the site is important, instead of just what it offers.  Talking about site features without bringing up why they're important tends to make articles sound more like ads.   Hope that helps. --Several Times 19:42, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The only currnecy on Meez is Coinz at the moment, but in 2006, Beans were used as currency.
so you mean that there is no meezz  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.40.233.236 (talk) 20:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currency 
Talk:Sociology of science

message: What a sad article. Aside from being tautological in its description of what science is (which should make any sociologist of science blush), it gives no indication at all of what the study of the sociology of science is about. It features two footnotes, one from a popular press book by an activist and one from a mid-1970s article in the Am. Rev. of Sociology which I suspect is not being described correctly at all. Very sad. --24.147.86.187 01:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Scientific_method#Citations has some citations on the collaborative nature of scientific societies which you are welcome to start with in your work on this soc article. --Ancheta Wis 15:55, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: I propose that this article be merged within the Sociology article. It's not notable enough and the article isn't expansive enough to be on its own. Beam 23:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but merged with the sociology of scientific knowledge rather than the sociology article.--Tomsega (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why merge it with sociology of scientific knowledge? That article clearly says "[...] is a self-conscious opposition to the sociology of science associated with the American Robert K. Merton" - so is there a difference or not?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.115.65.73 (talk) 14:51, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: While this article certainly is not of high quality, there is a whole field of study within universities regarding sociology of science, and it is frequently not based within sociology departments.  It seems to be a realm onto itself, and with some work, this article can be salvaged.
Nealc9999 (talk) 18:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noteablilty 

message: There were two sociology of science pages going. As this was only one paragraph long, that paragraph has been added to the sociology of scientific knowledge, and this article has been replaced with a redirect.--Tomsega (talk) 20:27, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move and merge
Talk:Fluxus at Rutgers University

message: This page needs to be worked on in conjunction with the generic Fluxus entry. 
It was a bit too bold to claim Rutgers as "arguably the birthplace of Fluxus" despite the importance of Rutgers to Fluxus history. Most of Fluxus has happened ouside of the academic world and much of the movement considered (and still considers) itself as being contrary to institutional art of all kinds (even institutional anti-art).Arevich 19:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Should this just be merged into Fluxus?  RJFJR (talk) 19:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Filipino Chinese cuisine

message: There's a problem with the links. I can't seem to make them visible. Someone needs to fix the problem! Strongfaithin1 19:39, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: But it seems like the latter part of the article isn't really about Chinese/Filipino cuisine, and is more about foreign influences upon Filipino cuisine
Dragonkillernz 11:15, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It may just be me... 

message: IT IS IRRELEVANT AND USELESS THANK YOU.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.68.114 (talk) 05:35, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  REMOVE THE LIFESTYLE PART.
Talk:Urodynamics

message: What picture?Renwick 19:40, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

message: There has been a person who keeps adding that it is an intimate procedure and that men don't like that.  The verbiage of the sentence is quite emotional.  Another editor cleaned it up and made it a general statement but the guy came back and added it again (third time).
Printexas (talk) 05:16, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal feelings being added
Talk:State of Hunza

message: The page should be like this:
Hunza may refer to
*Hunza Valley <--- should be the main article on Hunza
*Former State of Hunza <--- Currently this article is named Hunza, Pakistan
*Hunza River
*Hunza diet
*Hunza is the Muisca name of the city of Tunja, Colombia.
Waqas.usman 19:43, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The disambig page [[Hunza]]
Talk:Robert Wuthnow

message: IMO, he passes proftest due to Google . Computerjoe's talk 19:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also Google Print and Scholar show that he has both written quite a few publications and has been cited often.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:31, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proftest
Talk:Saudi Pro League

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 02:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Saudi Professional League →  – Per WP:COMMONNAME. League is very rarely referred to as Saudi Professional League, much more commonly as Saudi Pro League. Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:29, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 July 2023 

message: “ The scheme has been described as "sportswashing" by outside observers.”
The sentence takes the meaning out of the purpose of this article. This article is supposed to give sports information about the league, figures and data, and not newspaper words or biased opinions. Please remove it from the moderators. 77.31.222.94 (talk) 22:32, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to delete … 

message: change "French start Kylian Mbappé" to "French star Kylian Mbappé" Dwarftoss (talk) 04:14, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done M.Bitton (talk) 12:05, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 16 August 2023
Talk:Thomas Jefferson High School (Rockford, Illinois)

message: Just wanted to let you know that this is a work in progress.  I am an alumnus of Old Jefferson, Class of 1977, and am trying to get it right as far as the rules for the wikipedia is concerned.  I will be adding sources and external links to the entry as time permits.  Right now I am having some health issues and it is taking more time than I thought.  Thanks and please add your comments and suggestions, especially other alumnus from Jefferson.
--Hawk 20:00, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

message: The title to this section is a wikilink to the guidelines for contents for high school articles.  Please familiarize yourself with these if you are going to edit this article.  Thanks. Gtwfan52 (talk) 06:09, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:WPSCHOOLS/AG|School article guidelines]]
Talk:Aitor Karanka

message: This article is not about David Karanka, so he should not be bolded here. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Also, there is no need to wiki "Athletic Bilbao" multiple times; per Wikipedia's manual of style, you link it once, and that's enough. See Wikipedia:Only_make_links_that_are_relevant_to_the_context: Avoid duplicate links on a page. DR31 (talk) 20:07, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My mistake. DR31 (talk) 01:49, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Excessive bolding, redundant wikis

message: With the "Template:Infobox football biography", it states that only managerial or head coaching roles should be included within the Infobox. However, such assistant and other roles can be included elsewhere within the article.
:What it says in the infobox documentation is
::Please do not list positions other than team manager (such as assistant or coach positions, or director of football roles where this role is not considered managerial) unless that position is a significant part of the person's career (my highlighting)
:Think a three-year spell as assistant to Mourinho at Real Madrid, during which he learnt the trade at a very high level and without which he likely wouldn't have been considered for the Middlesbrough job, is a significant enough part of Mr Karanka's career to belong in the infobox. Could certainly do with better treatment in the body of the article, though. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of assistant manager roles from Infobox
Talk:List of Intel Core 2 processors

message: seems to start with the Core2 Duo line, these were the second incarnation of the Core line I believe.
what about the Core2 such as the 6320 (note NOT the E6320 there is no 'E' in the code)
I haven't the time to find the SL code, but I know this CPU exists, its in one of my old DELL Dimension E520 towers.
Cant find much via Google, only one reference as the search is flooded with the newer 'E' version aka  Core2 Duo E6320
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core2+6320+%40+1.86GHz  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.71.19.42 (talk) 16:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing early Core 2 Cpu's 

message: Referring to the info-page of Intel, there were three different versions of the Q6700, of which the main important difference was the TDP.
Link: http://ark.intel.com/products/30790/Intel-Core2-Quad-Processor-Q6700-8M-Cache-2_66-GHz-1066-MHz-FSB
Citing (sorry for not cleaning up the table-formatting):
Original: Q6700 with 105W TDP
Retired and Discontinued
Spec    Code 	Ordering Code 	Step 	RCP 	TDP
Boxed Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q6700 (8M Cache, 2.66 GHz, 1066 MHz FSB) LGA775
SLACQ 	BX80562Q6700    	G0 	N/A 	100 W
Intel® Core™2 Quad Processor Q6700 (8M Cache, 2.66 GHz, 1066 MHz FSB) LGA775, Tray
SLACQ 	HH80562PH0678MK 	G0 	N/A 	95 W
You can find some of these versions on pictures on ebay (although that doesn't mean the pictures belong to the sold cpu's... just the photos being proof of the existence of the models).
Does anyone have deeper knowledge of the history of this model Q6700?
Ragnar G.D.
178.200.169.48 (talk) 19:19, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intel Core 2 Quand Q6700 - (at least) three versions with differing TDP, even though of the same stepping? 

message: These processors are great but it's still not anything like Core.  It's way different and they operate on a virtual desk space.
The interface is different than all the computers.  Can be done also with i3 i5 & i7 series, however it's just not exactly a Core Two.  So I guess there you have it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:301:7751:2D0:D9E2:249:4E55:51B3 (talk) 11:46, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technologies 

message: ... thus, in all cases it should be denoted as: Core™2
Just my 0.02$
--MelioraCogito (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Core 2" is a Trademark 

message: You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:List of Intel Core processors § Table redesign.  I am intending to redesign the tables to remove less relevant info like part numbers, as well as merge same cells, remove segmentation rows, etc. — AP 499D25 (talk) 05:15, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at Talk:List of Intel Core processors: post-merge table redesign