lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Black Sea hostage crisis

message: No demands, just attention? --HanzoHattori (talk) 22:55, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What were the demands? 

message: Is this the correct location?  This has recently been discussed at other locations and was not supported? Off2riorob (talk) 21:16, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As I believe User:Off2riorob implies,   This discussion should stay at Talk:Erdinç Tekir, where there is an extensive discussion.   Bringing it here is illegitimate forum shopping.AMuseo (talk) 02:45, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 
Talk:Mapfre

message: The following text was proposed to be merged from MAPFRE Insurance before it was speedy deleted. placing text here in case someone wants to merge it into this article. --Trödel 03:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text from Mapfre Insurance (proposed merge) 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Schools/Article advice

message: Draft:BKTPP Prabir Sengupta Vidyalaya- this is my first draft. The draft is entirely single-handed, so it may contain flaws and errors. If any helpful editors can correct those, please do so.--Michri michri (talk) 08:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Draft deleted G5: Created by a banned or blocked user (Soutut) in violation of ban or block). Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:53, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft 

message: "Notable" is a term used often in policies and guidelines. However it seems to be used quite loosely here. I believe the word "notable" should only be used if used in the same way as policies and guidelines, so as to not create confusion. Particularly, in the "Other sections" and "Awards" section, replace all occurrences of "notable" with "significant" (or something of the like) other than when speaking about the Notable alumni/staff sections, and if there's ever a need to use a term that's opposite of "significant", to use the term "trivial." What do you guys think? The GEICO gecko (talk) 07:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The term "notable" 

message: You are invited to participate in an RfC at Wikipedia talk:Notability asking if relevant notability guidelines should be modified to clarify that notability can be used as a criterion for inclusion in embedded lists. If it is passed, it may result in changes to this advice article. ElKevbo (talk) 01:21, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevant RfC at [[Wikipedia talk:Notability]] about notability and embedded lists
Talk:Anglo-Americans

message: I hate to break it to ya, but Baspque Americans, and Castillian Americans are not Anglo.  Yet they are European.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.145.87.237 (talk) 13:36, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: this is not the place to discuss who isn't what ethnicity somebody is or isn't. Nor should it be anywhere. You're clearly a troll seeking to illicit controversy 2603:8001:5800:A8B8:E4FB:635:F8F:2A0D (talk) 18:35, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some of these definitions are clearly more common than others. This disambiguaton page can be safely divided into two "sections", no?
Namely:
Anglo-American usually refers to:
*X
*X
*X
It can also be used to refer to:
*X
*X
*X
Implying that use of the term for "a person from Anglo-America" is just as common as for an implied relationship between England and the United States (which is the obvious primary usage for the term) is nonsense. --SchutteGod (not logged in) 68.8.189.60 (talk) 18:09, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  All definitions equal? (short answer: no) 

message: Graphics designer 182.190.100.196 (talk) 11:13, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphics designer
Talk:South River, Ontario

message: Note that South River is an independently incorporated village, and as such belongs in the municipalities category. The communities cat is only for unincorporated communities within larger municipalities, not for communities that are municipalities in and of themselves. Bearcat 20:42, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: Is there an article for the actual river that the town was named after? I can't find it. I have some pictures I'd like to upload of the South River. Skeeter08865 (talk) 17:32, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The Actual South River
Talk:Edgewater (Barrytown, New York)

message: re "It may be a part of the Hudson River Historic District." Can somebody find out, and either confirm or strike out? LessHeard vanU 21:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is in fact part of the district, as I have now found it noted in a map included in the NRHP text for the district.  See the NRHP text PDF file, a reference in the Hudson River Historic District article.  It would be great if you or someone else would add more detail on Edgewater from that document. doncram 03:10, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncertain? 
Talk:Death Bringer

message: Any one else enjoy this game as much as I did?  Jtflood1976 20:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Article says this is for Amiga, C64, TurboGrafx-CD, and Sharp X68000, but links a MobyGames entry that lists the supported systems as Amiga, Atari ST, Commodore 64, DOS.
This means Wikipedia and MobyGames agree on Amiga and C64, but disagree on TGCD, X68000, Atari ST, and DOS.
What's the deal?
--HunterZ (talk) 02:40, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ports mismatch with Mobygames
Talk:An Inconvenient Truth/Archive 8

message: I've put this down to semi, & will ask the admin who put it at full to check William M. Connolley 18:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I asked for full protection because I felt everyone could do with a good chat, instead of just making the changes at will. GreenJoe 22:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prot? 

message: via sources above.  well documented (via court) that the film is innacurate.--68.115.80.156 03:55, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not gonna happen. Chris Cunningham 08:25, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  We should add "Innacurate" in the title paragraph

message: Minimal wire message here. I would suggest for some in-depth-coverage before jumping the gun. --Stephan Schulz 09:27, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That type of info should be added on al gore's page.--65.107.88.154 13:49, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

text: Did he win it for AIT?  --DHeyward 13:52, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  He won it for the work associated with AIT, in the timeframe of AIT. It doesn't need to be literally cause-and-effect to be pertinent to the article. Chris Cunningham 14:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed the fact the he along with the IPCC group were awarded the Nobel Prize was added to the article.  Out of curiosity is there any sort of official announcement from the Nobel Committee that is availabe to read?  The reason I ask is that if AIT isn't mentioned specifically as part of the reason he was given the award then I don't think it should be mentioned in this article.  Again the article is about the film, not Gore.  So if it's not mentioned as part of the reason why the award was given it shouldn't be here IMO. Elhector 19:23, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gore and IPCC awarded Nobel Peace Award
Talk:An Inconvenient Truth/Archive 10

message: Now we have something strange here. Dr. George Carlo apparently founded a Science and Public Policy Institute in 1994, along with its Safe Wireless Initiative. Carlo sent a letter to Ben Goldacre dated June 2, 2007, still listing himself as being associated with the Science and Public Policy Institute (SPPI) with the address given as 1101, Pennsylvania Ave. NW — 7th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20004.
One month later, Mr. Robert "Bob" Ferguson, one time Executive Director of the Center for Science and Public Policy, a project of "Frontiers of Freedom", chaired by aristocratic (his bro-in-law Lord Carnarvon is best friends with the Queen) former Republican senator Malcolm Wallop started using the exact same name, the Science and Public Policy Institute (SPPI) on a new website where he is also listed as Executive Director with exactly the same advisers that he had for the Center for Science and Public Policy, and at the same street address, 209 Pennsylvania Ave. So did Mr. Carlo sell the name to Mr. Ferguson, or is it normal for two unrelated yet identically named organizations to exist on the same street in Washington? Einztein 15:37, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 x SPPI?

message: On the basis of expert testimony, the judge also pointed to nine statements...
Which expert testimony is this statement referring to?  The case indicates only Bob Carter (a skeptic) had input resulting in the "nine statements" judgement.  This sentence should be clarified.  Unless otherwise indicated, I'd like to rephrase this as "On the basis of testimony from Dr. Bob Carter, the judge...".  See case: [] Gmb92 04:53, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Expert" testimony
Talk:12th Iowa Infantry Regiment

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class.  Referencing and appropriate inline citation guidelines not met.    --dashiellx (talk) 15:33, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:List of Irish counties by area

message: The CSO stats on County Clare list it as 3,450 km2, larger than Tyrone and surpassing it as 7th largest county. I'm aware that this edit may be controversial so does anyone have official statistics in area for Northern Ireland? --Ire2500 (talk) 17:15, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This:  has the areas of the NI counties, but in square miles, and excluding inland watera and tideways. For the record they were:
*Antrim 
*Armagh 
*Belfast City 
*Down 
*Fermanagh 
*Derry 
*Londonderry City (Derry on Wikipedia) 
*Tyrone 
I notice they all seem smaller than in the article... would that be the water?
Lozleader (talk) 18:41, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

text: The  (there doesn't seem to have been one published since) has the same area figures and also ranks the counties by area, Tyrone at No.8, Clare at No.7 Lozleader (talk) 12:38, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversial edit

message: There are no refs for the Northern Irish counties, but all county areas in ROI can be found in the CSO link. --TheEditor888 22:27, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation needed

message: Change londonderry to Derry 80.111.70.197 (talk) 05:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see a good reason why. See County Londonderry. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 05:48, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 March 2021 

message: Londonderry should be changed to Derry 95.45.133.107 (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done:, please see WP:DERRY for details. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 20:51, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2022 

message: Londonderry is a city name for Derry/Londonderry but the county is called Derry. 86.44.250.13 (talk) 19:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: See WP:DERRY. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:22, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 1 July 2022 

message: Change Londonderry to Derry Mitladd (talk) 19:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. This is a contentious change, and there is consensus for the current language. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:52, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 December 2022 

message: Change the name of the county "LONDONDERRY" to "LONDONDERRY/DERRY" OR "DERRY" to reflect how this county is known and to avoid misleading your readers.
This page gives the names of counties in Ireland.  LONDONDERRY does not reflect the name of this county accurately for the people living there, for the people of Ireland or for the Irish diaspora.  This county is known as DERRY.  I would expect wikipedia to at least include DERRY in the name. 149.50.161.97 (talk) 08:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Please see WP:DERRY. Jamedeus (talk) 08:50, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2024 

message: Change Londonderry to Derry 2A02:C7C:405A:8D00:72C4:689:52:9DCE (talk) 21:05, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 April 2024
Talk:MA plot

message: This article doesn't provide any introduction or explanation... can someone who knows more about the subject describe more what it's for in general terms? Pinball22 21:17, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs expansion...

message: "Two channel DNA microarrays are used when one wants to compare data from one sample, against some other sample (which will often be a reference sample)". This implies that this is only used with two channel DNA microarrays, when the method is also used with oligonucleotide arrays (in which case the two channels are on separate arrays).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoolium (talk • contribs) 10:40, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading Statement 

message: does M stand for magnitude and A for amplitude? -- 92.200.125.19 (talk) 22:26, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  M and A
Talk:MIBOR (Indian reference rate)

message: There's not much here but what the acronyms stand for and a graph.  This needs a lot of expansion from someone who knows more about the subject... what are these rates used for?  Who determines them?  Why are they important?  Pinball22 21:23, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why I put the context tag on this page...
Template talk:User es-mx

message: I think this user template has the wrong name: according to the IETF language tag convention it should be es-mx.-- Louie 21:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong template name! 

message: Changed wording to reflect that there are speakers of the Mexican dialect of Spanish who are not native speakers. --Shruti14 t c s 01:30, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I know what you mean, but unfortunately this template is attached to the babel user taxonomy, and it is used precisely to mark down native speakers of spanish. you must write your own template to mark your mexican spanish abilities as a foreign user. I've added you as a foreign user, to setup an example for you; you may adjust it as you please. Louie (talk) 20:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording
Talk:Shagreen

message: Reference to "untanned leather" needs to be changed - if it is untanned it is not leather and should read "untanned skin". If it is leather it cannot be untanned. --69.107.99.46 21:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untanned skin 

message: This article would do good if it had an image. I found one on flickr showing an old utensil case
covered in beautiful polished shagreen. The image is free to use and distribute if the authors name is mentioned. If you are a member of wikipedia, please upload it.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/29995594@N06/2842086378/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.176.52.166 (talk) 05:59, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a nice picture, and I'll add it as an external link, but the license isn't compatible with Wikipedia — it's "attribution-noncommercial-noderivatives" but Wikipedia requires the looser license of "attribution" or "attribution-sharealike". See Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr and Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Dreamyshade (talk) 18:39, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  An image 

message: *I heard of a wallet being made of tanned shark skin with the denticles pointing upwards, so that is difficult for a pickpocket to quietly extract it from a pocket because the denticles catch in the pocket lining. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:36, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of genuine shark skin
Talk:Doles

message: This page was incorrectly marked as being "This article or other page provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. It is patent nonsense (CSD G1). Speedy concern: This article or other page provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. It is patent nonsense (CSD G1)."  
The intention is to post information relevant to the Doles surname.  I will be adding notable people in history with the surname Doles.  I felt that an introduction was relevant.  Aside from minor formatting, the information is relevant and correct.  Please tell me how it provides no meaningful conent or history.
:Not a speedy. Charles Matthews 21:40, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Vredesbyrd

message: I once did one edit of this page, with this description: Reverted to old (Burden Of Wrath) translation of the title (instead of Wrath Child). I don't speak Norwegian, but some online dictionary says that "child" is "barn" and "burden" is "byrde". Since then I found out that "byrd" means "ancestry". This is somehow close to "burden", so I just leave a note here instead of editing it again.  — ⟨✆∣µzdzisław∣⚒⟩ 23:28, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Title translation
Talk:Blue Bus of Penwortham

message: Some of the bus routes may be incorrect, I've split the bus routes into public services and school buses, but some in the school section may be routes that no longer exist - the ordinary route 98 was withdrawn in 2006, but I'm not sure if there is also a school bus - I've no idea about the 118, there's a 118 to Blackburn but it's run by Redline. I've not checked the rest of the article yet. Snigbrook 21:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs updating
Talk:Pumpkin bomb

message: SOMEBODY ADD A PICTURE  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.132.115.69 (talk) 09:43, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. All I have are on paper and copyrighted by someone else. Thanx to Oda mari for his contribution and source.--Reedmalloy (talk) 06:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

text: This was for the high explosive version. Previously, testing was carried out with the inert version. Altered the text to make this clearer. Hawkeye7 (talk) 07:45, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

text: Not an error. Used for the radar proximity fuzes, not radar tracking. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 02:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
Talk:List of Chicano rappers

message: This is not the place to put "new" Chicano rappers.  All rappers in this list must still pass WP:BAND, meaning "new and up and coming" doesn't qualify.  If they don't have independent 3rd party coverage, they do not qualify and will be reverted.  Pharmboy (talk) 20:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Rappers

message: Why are Cartel de Santa, Molotov, and Control Machete listed here? They're not Chicanos, but Mexicans. saɪm duʃan Talk|Contribs 10:47, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexican artists? 

message: 1. Mexican Vs Chicano (Mexican Origin but born in the USA). Molotov and other Mexican groups should be removed. Or all northern Rap crews and MC's (Monterrey etc.) included... 
2. missing:
Dyablo (at least)
--Loco88888 (talk) 13:45, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some inputs 

message: mr.sancho, who's known by Estilo from Estilomusic619 he left lowprofilerecords to become independent under AWAL Sony Distribution & OneRPM Distribution. Estilomusic619 (talk) 06:35, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social media site, so we only publish what has already been covered in mainstream publications.  That is how we determine what is notable, and what is not: the amount of coverage in various print, web and other media, and how significant the coverage is.  Dennis Brown - 2¢ 07:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Dennis Brown Yeah, I feel you on that - estilo did get back with lowprofilerecords, but left again the label once again. there's so much to cover when he left in 2013 from lowprofilerecords Estilomusic619 (talk) 09:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: @Dennis Brown how do I get my story up there I'm signed under sancho and I have a link on the web wen I was on the TV News I'm the first Chicano Rapper to be in the hall of fame in my city Estilomusic619 (talk) 09:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to understand that Wikipedia isn't about promotion.  To be in the list, you need an article here.  To have an article here, you need someone ELSE to write it.  For someone else to write it, there needs to be significant coverage from multiple reliable sources, ie: mainstream publications, that do more than list tracks or making passing mentions.  This is what we mean by "notable", it means you've been talked about in detail in multiple publications, each which is recognized as "reliable".  Reliable here means they have an editorial staff that fact checks things and have general acceptance by the greater community of journalists of being truthful and not promotional.  Also, having singles that chart in national charts is helpful.  Not smaller charts, but like Billboard.  Being signed isn't enough, not by a mile.  Many thousands are signed every year, maybe one or two go on to actually enjoy enough success to be notable.  All this seems like a lot, but it's the only way to make sure that every article can be verified as being factual.  You can't verify something if no one is covering it in detail.  Being signed only is a case of WP:TOOSOON.  Dennis Brown - 2¢ 01:29, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about sancho?
Talk:Ground Round

message: This article is in need of cleanup, both due to the tone (which seems to be written as an investment pamphlet), poor grammar and spelling, and lack of any verifiable citations whatsoever.--12.197.7.22 (talk) 17:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup needed

message: Basic information to add to this article:  the origin of the name "Ground Round" (it's probably named for a particular cut of ground beef). 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:21, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Talk:Chanzy (instrument)

message: I felt that this atricle was being improperly used as a redirect page to Antoine de Chanzy.  I have changed it to a stub article (note: needs proper stub tags and clean-up, as well as more sources and a thumbnail) about the Tuvan instrument of the same name.  I have also decided to watch the page in case anyone decides, for whatever reason, to re-modify it into a redirect page.
Odoriku 22:01, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:George Mason Law Review

message: Why exactly is this article significantly more lengthy than either the Harvard Law Review University of Pennsylvania Law Review or Yale Law Journal entries? 70.21.38.201 (talk) 18:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability? Article Length?

message: In consideration of your comments, this page has been shortened and edited. Please remove the banner at the top of the page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.174.233.95 (talk) 21:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  We have edited and shortened the Page 

message: Are there any particularly famous or influential articles that can be mentioned here? Idag (talk) 04:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  All of these articles have been cited >25 times according to Google Scholar, and the works that cite them have themselves been cited even more. Also, two of the authors are notable academics as they have their own Wikipedia articles.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Staeiou (talk • contribs) 14:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Influential Articles

message: Does anyone think that the COI still stands?  Most of the self-glorifying content has been removed and this article did get a good amount of traffic from the AfD.  Staeiou (talk) 14:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the policy, I think we should keep it around until something new and substantive gets added.  A lot of content was removed, but the only thing that was added was your mention of the four influential articles.  Thus, this article still largely reflects the views of its (presumptively) George Mason Law Review members.  Idag (talk) 22:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of Interest