Talk:Edmund Pevensie

message: can we put a character templates in narnia character articles? i've seen harry potter and others, and maybe narnia deserve to have it as well. HoneyBee 23:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: character templates

message: I think external links should be pertinent, i.e. they should specifically concern the article's subject. The subject of the Edmund Pevensie article is the Edmund Pevensie character, and the current external link, i.e. http://www.narniaweb.com, is a generic site about the Narnia saga: I think it should be removed. I replaced it with http://narnia.wikia.com/wiki/edmund_pevensie, but XLinkBot removed it, saying XLinkBot removes "external links which may not be in line with policy or guideline.  Wikia links are often so.  The external links guideline has something to say about other wikis (which, generally, are just as unreliable and unstable as wikipedia itself)". It advised me to talk about it in this talk page. What shall I do? --Aplomb Dinamico (talk) 13:43, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links: pertinent? 

message: I think it might be interesting to note somewhere in the article that Edmund was the name of two kings of England.
http://www.behindthename.com/name/edmund
--99.197.162.35 (talk) 01:32, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edmund, King of England 

message: you see, Edmund mostly did all of those things because he ate the devil's(witches) fruit also known as enchanted Turkish delight.
Eventually the spell begins to break and Edmund sees the error of his ways inevitably almost giving up his life by smashing the witch's wand.All in all, Edmund is just another child learning about life, cut him slack.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Defector1234 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  more information 

message: I serached on Google, using the name Edmund Pevensie, just to see if he or any of his siblings were supposed to be in the newest Narnia movie. I have not read any of them, so I don't know what is going to happen. And then, on the search results, this shows up, and I havn't even clicked on Wikipedia: 
"Edmund Pevensie - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaEdmund "Ed" Pevensie (1930 - 1949) is a major fictional character in C. S. Lewis's Chronicles of Narnia. He is a principal character in three of the seven ..."
It clearly says he is going to die young in one of the books (and movies). I see no point in having such a majo spoiler in the first line in the article. Instead it should be mentioned in the reference to the book it happen in. 84.210.29.167 (talk) 20:36, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoiler

message: An anonymous editor from London (IP:109.151.133.239) has made several changes of the past few weeks indicating that Edmund is not actually 10 as the unreferenced statement in the article claims, but is rather 12 or possibly 13. My chief concerns are twofold:
# The change is similarly unreferenced, but believe that TL,tW,&tW discusses the ages of the children. I don't, however, have a copy with me to confirm this.
# The anon also made changes to indicate that individuals were turned to ice and not stone, which is clearly wrong and so I doubt the editor understands the subject and is relying on memory or some adaptation of the story.
In short, if someone would be so kind as to provide the passage describing Edmund's age here, that would help resolve this dispute. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:23, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: And Edmund is the third-oldest of the siblings. Peter is 13 and Susan is 12 which would make him no older than 11. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:30, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edmund's age 

message: One of the overall issues with this article is the ongoing confusion between the novels and films of the novels. As it stands, it is of very little use. Ideally, the main section should be devoted to the novels only. Films should be considered in a separate section or a separate article. Petrosbizar (talk) 16:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Issues