Talk:Cherimoya

message: It's "Chirimoya" not "Cherimoya" but the main title cannot be changed to proerp spelling —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.48.226.60 (talk • contribs) 
:Depends on what language you are using. In English, Cherimoya is the usual spelling; in Spanish, Chirimoya. - MPF 22:00, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ortographical mistake

message: Trace metals (sic)minerals Miss B.Liver (talk) 14:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Typological mistake

message: The current revision says:
"Cherimoya is . . . native to the Andean-highland valleys of Peru, Ecuador, Colombia, Argentina, Chile and Bolivia. Although it is widely popular in Chile, Cherimoya is not native to that area."
This does not make sense.
What is reality here?  
--Lmbstl 13:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Native land

message: I have a wonderful Cherimoya which has produced fruit for me.  The flowers of this tree have only three petals.  In addition the CFRG (California Rare Fruit Growers)site has drawings of the flowers with three petals.  Once in a while, while hand pollinating these flowers, I have run across a flower with four petals.
 69.224.190.233 01:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the flower has only three petals 

message: http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/dissertationen/bridg-hannia-2000-03-24/HTML/index.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.163.214.177 (talk) 20:17, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cherimoya In vitro Culture - Reference 

message: "The name, cherimoya, is sometimes <B>mis</B>applied to the less-esteemed custard apple" http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/morton/cherimoya.html (emphasis added) "Its descriptive English name [custard apple] has been widely misapplied to other species" http://www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/morton/custard_apple.html
--Mmm (talk) 03:16, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, the Brits are the authorities on tropical fruits. ;) Kortoso (talk) 23:43, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cerimoya vs. custard apple 

message: "One should also avoid eating the skin as it may cause paralysis from 4 to 5 hours."
This section needs a citation.  I did a look through multiple web sites about the plant and fruit and can find no mention of the toxicity/paralysis nature of the skin of the fruit.  Twigs and seeds seem to have several mentions, but the most I can find concerning the skin is that it isn't to be eaten.  If this is because it is not edible, than the artical should be updated. If it does have paralytic effects, can someone cite this with a reliable source (preferably academic or scholarly). SmoJoe (talk) 17:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone verify the toxicity of the skin? 

message: The Chirimoyas are native from Chile, too. Be careful about that OMISSION, because chileans has a BIG resentment against Chile and they use to go all around the internet trying to claim that this kind of things are THEIR "natural patrimony", but not based in scientific facts, but nationalism.
Check the following links (specially the botanical database) in which I sustain that Chirimoyas are native from Chile, too. Something omitted in this article, which will certainly be use in the future by Peru (the government, politicians, media, etc) to keep claiming that Chile is "stealing" their biological patrimony for producing Chirimoyas (something weird, because several countries produce Chirimoyas but Peru claims only against Chile about the "stealing"... well, as I told, the reason is a pretty old resentment).
And BTW,  I'm not sure if the Chirimoyas are native from Bolivia, too (?). At least the botanical database I'm referencing doesn't include Bolivia as a native land for this fruit.
http://www.bioversityinternational.org/Information_Sources/Species_Databases/New_World_Fruits_Database/qryall3.asp?intIDSpecies=86
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annona_cherimola  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.161.92.138 (talk) 06:51, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Kudos for this comment! Thank you for not accepting this kind of attitude.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milamianno22 (talk • contribs) 16:30, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chilean omission 

message: *Merge from Annona cherimola. Common English name; illogical to have two separate articles on the very same species, as we do not have separate articles for Peach and Prunus persica. Badagnani (talk) 22:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't make any sense. The cherimoya is a cherimoya, not a custard-apple, and we don't have separate articles for Peach and Prunus persica--one article is sufficient to discuss the tree and its fruits. Badagnani (talk) 19:25, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: First off, on the English side of the Atlantic, we call them custard apples.  Regardless, it's perfectly acceptable to discuss tree and fruit within one article, but an article on the tree is for the botanical aspects of the tree and its fruit.  The article for fruit is about the fruit as a food, rather than as a botanical subject.  That's why there are two articles, and that's why we should have an article for prunus persica.  Tealwisp (talk) 23:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cherimoya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930042220/http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/sea/products/afdbases/af/asp/SpeciesInfo.asp?SpID=1728 to http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/sea/Products/AFDbases/af/asp/SpeciesInfo.asp?SpID=1728
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified