lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shape (Go)

message: March 4, 2007 This article was newly requested on the Wikipedia project page. I started it from my draft page content. The link is good. It was flagged as a candidate for speedy deletion within a minute. Now there is content and a book reference. Perhaps Mr. Matthews can expand it. 
My footnote did not make footnotes. 
OK Thanks. Larry R. Holmgren 22:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New article

message: There seems to be something with people contesting the creation of go-related articles, take a look at Blood-vomiting game and List of famous go games for some examples. CanbekEsen 22:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems some "Recent changes" patrollers aren't reading the text or giving any articles a chance before slapping the delete tag on them. CanbekEsen 22:44, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The version that was tagged contained only a reference to a book.  It was entirely appropriate to put a  tag on the page.  Expansions since then have provided a context.  Working on pages offline or in user and using the Show preview button would solve the problem.--FreeKresge 01:26, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attempts at deletion

message: This article currently mentions a lot of different shapes and gives some analysis on them, but without defining what the shapes are in the first place. There need to be either diagrams defining all the shapes, or point-notations given for all the shapes. —Lowellian (reply) 01:22, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no reliable way to describe Go shapes through "point notations", unless the entire board can be seen in a diagram. Besides, shapes are not confined to one position on the board. I'll try and contribute some clear explanations however. VanTucky 01:25, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shapes need to be defined

message: I couldn't find a reliable source for the Japanese terms for the Lion's Mouth and the Tiger's Mouth formations, so I did a transliteration. If anyone has a more official source of Go terms that say differently regarding these two terms, feel free to replace mine. --Cless Alvein 19:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A net is certainly not any effective shape, a ponnuki is not an example of a net.  A net is a specific shape. And the mouth shape is only a net if the last corner of the square is filled.  Even then I would only use the word net if there is actually a stone beeing captured by it. Taemyr (talk) 15:46, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation of terms

message: Hi, the positions in the comment under the large image of all the moves is wrong, someone must have edited the picture without changing the positions. I don't know all the names of the positions so I don't want to edit it myself. :)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.231.93.165 (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image description wrong 

message: https://senseis.xmp.net/?Magari
The turn means you have a stone at the location where a hane leaves the cutting point. Hane doesn't mean turn. 2600:1006:B04F:6BE5:6886:72F6:227:6742 (talk) 10:06, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turn ≠ Hane (they mean different things)
Talk:Ximending

message: http://www.ximending.tw/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.218.131.98 (talk) 01:39, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links
Talk:Edward William Binney

message: Where is the Edward Binney who invented
crayola Crayons?
 ==
GRRR—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.82.80.113  (talk • contribs) 
:That's Edwin Binney you're looking for. Awyong J. M. Salleh 00:45, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aridaia

message: Hi, despite advising me to read Wikipedia rules, you broke the three-revert rule yourself so please undo your latest revert. Next, the reason why a church operated by an ethnic Macedonian in this town is notable is obvious; Greece denies the existence of ethnic Macedonians in its territory, so a Macedonian church being operated here is significant. If you'd like to add something about the other churches in town, that'd be swell. But, in the meantime, refrain from deleting sourced content. --Local hero talk 03:36, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: To the drive-by vandal
Talk:Blues from Laurel Canyon

message: Moon wasn't even a year old when this album was recorded...although "Moon" is mentioned in the second verse. I'm just questioning the wording in the article.Frankzappatwin (talk) 11:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Met Moon Unit???

message: Although there is no band name on this album, I think it's more sensible to say that the Bluesbreakers broke up after this album. Because once this line-up disbanded, Mayall's style changed considerably.  Jules TH 16 (talk) 20:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bluesbreakers break-up
Talk:USS Tripoli (LPH-10)

message: I remember something about a turbine blowing up after the PRAV in July 1977 (we were 'dead in the water' for about three days). Nothing happened to the Captain (I forget his name); he actually was promoted to Admiral (lower-half O7). It was during the sea trials and the Capt put in a full emergency stop. the ship shook and the boom! then nothing.66.74.42.29 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 06:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Taipei City Mall

message: I have removed text from the lead that described this as one of the most popular underground malls. This may be true (I can't think of that much competition in this category); however, this requires at least a citation and possibly some context. It has never struck me as a particularly popular place. 36.224.231.193 (talk) 01:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Most popular?
Talk:M. Lee Pelton

message: I have no freaking doubt he got divorced and re-married. But, again, this is the biography of a living person and as such information needs to be properly sourced. The source last given did not back up the statement. It said absolutely nothing about M. Lee Pelton. It talked about a Carol Pelton, but we cannot assume that means she is currently, or formerly married to M. Lee Pelton. Maybe it just happens to be another person with that last name. We don't know, because the source does not tell us, and that is what is needed. Further, a press release also fails as a reliable source. Please, if you want to update it, find a proper source that gives the information you are adding. Aboutmovies (talk) 21:16, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marital status 

message: This article needs to be fixed with sources for unverified material, cosmetic updates, and a better sense of his career history and board positions (whether current or former).--Esietukeme (talk) 16:16, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of Article 
Talk:Gan (Stephen King)

message: There is no direct evidence that Gan directly opposed Tak; the "God" in that book is not known for sure to be Gan itself; it may very well be "just" the God of that particular level of the Tower or Parallel Universe....hence my statement in the paragraphs above the one that was introduced and later removed by myself.
We all know that Gan created everything in every Stephen King Universe; what we aren't sure of, however, is whether or not the God seen in various SK books is Gan himself or just an "underling" or lesser "servant" of the White (except, of course, the God of the Keystone World [our real world], who is more or less directly referred to as Gan).
As to Tak itself, that creature wasn't even all that aware of the God 'seen' in the pages of Desperation; while it did believe in other Gods (its own name means, essentially, "big God" it was aware only at the end, and after it was too late, that God was manipulating it. 
Furthermore, Tak showed no indication whatsoever (in either novel) that it served anything or anyone else.....not even the Crimson King.  Thanos777 22:19, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Tak and Gan
Talk:Oscar Martinez (The Office)

message: I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 20:12, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunder Mifflin

message: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar Martinez has multiple sources listed which may help in developing this article.  -- Banjeboi 21:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources 

message: Had a little re-write and a go through 150.237.85.247 (talk) 14:37, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-Write 

message: Oscar is Hispanic not colored as stated in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.52.208.197 (talk) 21:18, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assuming ethnicity 

message: I am new to Wikipedia editing and wanted to practice on one of my favorite shows. I added a little bit more to Oscar's biography (as he was such an underrated character) and added more context to background. Acha2023 (talk) 05:59, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding more to Biography
Talk:Stanley Hudson

message: I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 20:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunder Mifflin

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Stanley Hudson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stanley Hudson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
 (JayPlaysStuff | talk to me | What I've been up to) 11:43, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Stanley Hudson]] for deletion
Talk:Kelly Kapoor

message: The fact box lists her nationality as Indian-American. That's not a nationality. To be clear, it's right that the article explains in some form that she is Indian-American, but it's not her nationality. 2A02:C7C:53CF:5100:7D49:8524:EE5F:A307 (talk) 00:24, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 

message: In the Spouses section there is a link to baseball player Ryan Howard. 188.178.155.118 (talk) 18:36, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: . Fixed it. Good catch, thanks. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 18:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong link to Ryan Howard
Talk:Meredith Palmer

message: I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 20:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunder Mifflin

message: In a deleted scene for "Frame Tody," it is implied that Michael and Meredith had sex.  Should this be added to the article?PokeHomsar (talk) 04:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael and Meredith had sex... 
Talk:Teresa Cristina of the Two Sicilies

message: She is only an orphan after both her parents died.Tallewang (talk) 05:52, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily, see Orphan. Most dictionary entries for "orphan" have definitions which include children who have lost only one parent and children which have been abandoned in some degree by their parents. Teresa Cristina experienced both.  • Astynax talk 08:56, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphan 

message: I have fully protected the article for three days per this edit warring report. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection 

message: Recently, I have been engaged in an edit war with User:Lecen on the use of honorifics. I thought that it's against Wikipedia's MOS to retain honorifics, including those of royalty. If memory serves me correctly, the few exceptions are Burmese honorifcs (for instance, U Thant). Then why is it that when it comes to 18th to 19th century Portuguese and Brazilian royalty, we see the brazen use of "dom/dona/don"? Why is it that certain users are blockings attempts on deleting these honorifcs?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.55.3.168 (talk) 11:02, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: See the section above this one. DrKiernan (talk) 11:07, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: For an IP with few contributions you seem to know a lot about Wikipedia rules. --Lecen (talk) 11:35, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: My Wiki username is "Coincleaner", but I have forgotten BOTH the password and email of my account. So I've given up all attempts to recover it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.55.3.168 (talk) 12:11, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dom honorific issue 
Talk:Darryl Philbin

message: There is a joke made in the series by Dwight, saying "Val Kilmer?" when Darryl is talking about Val at somepoint. This was a joke, referencing Val Kilmer. The Val in the series is called Val Johnson.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.85.1.100 (talk) 01:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Val Johnson

message: Darryl does not have a dry, humorless personality, he is constantly making fun of michael and playing practical jokes on him.
:Other than making fun of Michael, he is always played straight.  The article makes this clear, I think.  Wavy G 08:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sense of humor

message: I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 20:31, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunder Mifflin

message: "Darryl's demeanor though, makes it seem as he is purely in it for the physical relationship."
This is arguable at best.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.94.167.50 (talk) 20:50, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral POV?
Talk:Jan Levinson

message: I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 20:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunder Mifflin

message: I just made an edit to help out this article on length.  I can remove all of the warnings at the top of the page if no one objects.  169.234.143.14 (talk) 02:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article length

message: I haven't found any reference to the origin of Jan's last name by the creators, but psychologists Levinson and Gould actually wrote quite an influential paper on the midlife crisis. I think this fit too nicely with Jan's character to be dismissed as coincidence. 70.55.24.144 (talk) 05:57, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of the Name

message: If her first name is "Janet" someone needs to cite what episode or document it came from. I don't recall her ever being named anything other than "Jan". —Gendralman (talk) 22:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  First name
Talk:Fareless Square

message: With the elimination of the Free Rail Zone, I think this article should be moved back to "Fareless Square", a name used far longer than Free Rail Zone. Thoughts? --Another Believer (Talk) 19:17, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree, and I was already planning to move it a few days after the change takes effect.  Moving it a little sooner, or a little later, would be fine, but it definitely should be moved back to the old name. SJ Morg (talk) 23:38, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  , though I have not yet updated the article accordingly. Especially now that the zone has been eliminated, this would be a good "historical" article to expand to GA status. --Another Believer (Talk) 15:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Know of any helpful images for this article? ---Another Believer (Talk) 17:10, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image(s)?
Talk:AK-22

message: I don't know what a sidefolder is so I'm thinking AK 22 Sidefolder may be about the same firearm as this article in which case it should be merged. --Jon186 22:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion

message: This article is very misleading. The only true .22 caliber AK in existence is the WASR-22, and there's already an article on the WASR line with a specific section on the WASR-22. There are other .22 AKs but they are merely custom conversions or lookalikes. While some gunsmiths may build their own .22 caliber AKs and refer to them as AK-22s, There is no standardized and official "AK-22". We could merge this with the WASR article to provide a bit more insight on the WASR-22, though I don't think it would hurt to delete this altogether. Opensourcelinuxm 09:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete or merge...=

message: While AK-22 has been used to refer to a military training rifle styled after the AK-47, it is also a generic term applied to .22 rifles styled after the AK-47 made by underground workshops in parts of the world where .22 LR ammunition is commercially available for hunting and pest control, such as India/Bangladesh where AK-22s are named as seized in police raids and as used by urban terrorist groups who cannot obtain better weapons. ("‘AK-22’ sub-machine guns used in Dhaka attack", Armament Research Services (ARES), Perth, 19 Jan 2017.) Since most are based on a copy of the mechanism of the Swedish Carl Gustav m/45 Model 1945 submachine gun scaled down to the recoil impulse of the ,22 LR cartridge, they are referred to in police and news reports as Carlos. The stocks, grips, sights added to the basic mechanism are often styled to look like some locally common military issue weapon.  -- Naaman Brown (talk) 15:04, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  AK-22 as a generic term (like Carlo)
Talk:Tingvoll Church

message: The article "Tingvoll church" is based on the book a local historian wrote about the church: "Martin Lamvik, Bygdehistorie for Tingvoll og Straumsnes, III. Kyrkje og skule". This same historian helped before his death in providing information for the web-site noted in the article. I hope this is sufficient references for not deleting the article. --Arve Holmeide 22:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-01 Joyce Foundation

message: No, no, no, no. We don't insert poorly sourced information without a hope of citation, and certainly not when it's "Criticism" of an organization. That's #2 in my book to adding unreferenced criticism to a person. The fact that Kevin has summarily rejected WP:RS, probably one of the most important policies in the entire project, is telling: "I reject the policy of WP:RS as destructive to the very concept of Wikipedia and will not follow it.)" Kevin, you might want to read WP:V and WP:N. A bunch of gun rights activists on their blog said the organization is bad? Source it to somebody notable, or remove it. We don't set up the Wikimedia Foundation for lawsuits for absolutely no reason. -Wooty Woot? contribs 22:30, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree. Matches my impression of / experience with Hipocrite. I don't think he's a bad guy, it's just that his troll genes sometimes get the better of him. ;-) Check out his talk page. Chrisahn 21:04, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Civility is an internal concern. Adding unsourced criticism is an external one, in my opinion a more important one, and weighs badly on credibility, as well as opening WF up for potential libel lawsuits, does it not? -Wooty Woot? contribs 02:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does (not the libel - you can't libel an orginization). You will find a steady stream of blogwarriors rolling in to give their two cents on how I'm a terrible, terrible man for following WP:RS and WP:ATT, and then going back to POV war on their blogarticles. Hipocrite - «Talk» 05:37, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Kimi yo Fundo no Kawa o Watare

message: An editor who I almost always agree with removed a prod from this article, stating that notability was lent by two interwikis; I note, though, that the article has been deleted from the Japanese Wikipedia and that the article on the Chinese Wikipedia has two total revisions. Since there is no actual substantive information on the page, I'd argue that it was a fair prod. If there's nothing more to be said here, I'd argue in favor of an AfD. Dekimasuよ! 13:24, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did not notice the Japanese transwiki leads to an empty article.  I am not much of a WP:NOTFILM expert, nor do I have time to track through the google hits for the Japanese title (there are about 12,500).  But, I still think that the article is better served by AFD than the PROD, since PRODs are supposed to be obviously non-notable; and I prefer to err on the side of caution on articles like this. Neier 04:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I have not found any discussion for deletion of this article in Japanese Wikipedia.  Probably this article has not be established at all in Japanese language. I am not sure whether this film was famous in Japan, but it was indeed famous in China, especially in late 1970s and early 1980s.  --Neo-Jay 09:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod removal

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 20:53, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag
Talk:Abortion in South Africa

message: At 01:44 on 22 March 2007, a user at 76.185.10.76 said "morning after pill is NOT abortion,http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/morning-after-pill/AN00592 completely false and a myth that needs to stop."
IMO there is no need to exclude the morning-after pill from an abortion article, because:
* One of the ways in which a morning-after pill can work, is to prevent implantation of the embryo.  If by the time the embryo exists, a method is used to expell it, that method is called abortion (if viewed against the definitions for abortion in the Wikipedia).
It is true that the morning-after pill may not be an act of abortion if the blastocyst hasn't formed by the time the pill is taken, but the fact is that emergency contraception also work by after the blastocyst (embryo) has formed. -- leuce 18:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morning-after pills 
Talk:Maborosi

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 21:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: Here are some refs which could be used to expand the article:
*Hartford Courant review
*San Francisco Chronicle review
···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:58, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible refs 
Template talk:Australian cricket seasons

message: The base template for say the 1850-51 season is 
The 1850-51 Australian cricket season took place in late 1850 and early 1851.
==Events==
==References==
* Association of Cricket Statisticians and Historians - various publications
* Wisden Cricketers Almanack
* CricketArchive


category:Australian cricket seasons from 1850-51 to 1889-90
Category:1850 in cricket
Category:1851 in cricket
Category:1850 in Australia
Category:1851 in Australia
When creating a season article suggest using this template for the CricketArchive links to that season and appropriate categories by year.  At present there are many articles witht he templqte but they are being proposed for deletion as otherwise empty of content.--Golden Wattle  talk 22:46, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article template suggestion