lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hoffmaster State Park

message: For reference :Template:Infobox Protected area  7&6=thirteen (talk) 18:39, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Latitude: 43.12947. Longitude: -86.26744.  Needs something in infobox.  7&6=thirteen (talk) 18:52, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Protected area infobox
Talk:Saugatuck Dunes State Park

message: Please delete the "#REDIRECT Goshorn Lake" tag goshorn lake should not redrict here see the example here http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&hl=en&saddr=goshorn+lake&daddr=Saugatuck+State+Park&sll=42.699091,-86.174526&sspn=0.054879,0.1157&ie=UTF8&ll=42.692025,-86.17384&spn=0.054885,0.1157&z=13&om=1
Rgtfg 21:11, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Warren Dunes State Park

message: The text of this article states that Tower Hill is the highest point in this park, rising 240 feet above Lake Michigan. The picture caption for Tower Hill dune in this article states that it rises 236 feet above the lake. The Michigan Department of Natural Resources Warren Dunes website refers to a dune formation (Tower Hill?) rising 260 feet above the lake. I don't know which of these figures is correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bunkyray5 (talk • contribs) 22:37, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height of tallest dune
Talk:GM Family 0 engine

message: Family 0 has since been expanded to include the 1364cc Twinport engine.  Just thought you'd like to know. --
: That's actually a Family 1 engine, so it's listed there. What these two articles lack is info on eralier non-TwinPort (pre-2002) variants... --DmitryKo 23:01, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Is this series of engines not related to the Suzuki G engine? I'd always hear people (and possibly journalists too) saying how the 1 litre engine in the Corsa is a Suzuki engine, however this page suggests otherwise. --Zilog Jones 11:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The geometry, compression ratio and drivetrain seem to be totally different. --85.140.238.251 21:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 0 + Suzuki G
Talk:Fraz-Urb'luu

message: the proper title for this article should be Fraz-Urb'luu, with the capital "U". —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.250.39.181 (talk • contribs) .
:Thanks for the heads up, moved to correct capitalization. --Muchness 01:28, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proper title
Talk:Andreas Ottl

message: *Any paticular reason why Andreas Ottl was put into this category? The article looks factual.Kingjeff 01:36, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Living person category

message: Andreas Ottl is not the only Munich-born player apart from Philipp Lahm. Christian Lell is also a Munich-born player who works for FC Bayern. Higgi76 09:00, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  born in Munich
Talk:American Camp Association

message: I thaught it was independent of scouting.
:It is, but it is related and the Scouting project covers related topics as well. Rlevse 16:58, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I would not consider this a scouting stub.  There are many camping groups in this organization that have no relation to scouting (i.e. YMCA camps, church camps, ect.) --Cpkondas 13:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this have much to do with scouting? 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Tim Rogers (writer)

message: Obvious self-promotion by a freelance journalist of little note. Recommend deletion.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.44.219.212 (talk • contribs) .
*Speedy delete as non-notable biography (CSD A7). Tagged. SYCTHOStalk 01:44, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Tim Rogers (writer)]]
Talk:John Godfrey

message: The Independent Review of Accusations of Sexual Assault (https://ukings.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Report_Final_March-13_REDACTED-revision2.pdf) Against Dr. Wayne Hankey (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayne_Hankey) has been released, and some of it refers to the President of the University of King's College in 1981 (e.g., p.32-34), which would seem to have been Godfrey. 170.199.159.214 (talk) 20:06, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should findings from King's Report be added?
Talk:Correction fluid

message: Agree:  This is barely an article anyway, so lets merge. M@$+@ Ju ~ ♠ 21:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging The Article

message: I'm going to add a section on abuse of Correction Fluid as an inhalent, and i think i should add a few links to the various sections on the different brands of Correction Fluid.
JaMiE P 04:29, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The abuse section is potentially useful, but the killer ingredient was 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, now banned under the Montreal Protocol. Does correction fluid still get you high? TheMadBaron 07:25, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding a section on Abuse

message: What is this?  The only references to it on-line are to this article and copies of it, which sounds very unlikely to me if it's a genuine solvent.  Toluene, perhaps? Tevildo (talk) 11:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I note from the page history that it should be toluene.  Link fixed. Tevildo (talk) 11:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

text: I wouldn't normally edit someone's comment except to fix markup errors, but Tevildo already struck through it, and this is a page about correction fluid, so please indulge me. —80.192.180.160 (talk) 21:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Totounel 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=89738. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The section on the manufacturing process appears to be meant for kindergarteners. It contains close to no useful information on the said manufacturing process.
78.113.95.138 (talk) 00:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manufacturing Process Section 

message: White-outs don't come with brushes any more Caleb KG (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lids attached to brushes?
Talk:Space Shuttle design process

message: Evolution of the Space Shuttle Shape--Craigboy (talk) 06:44, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly helpful video 

message: — Assignment last updated by Duranandrew6264 (talk) 01:31, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse-2002

message: It has commonly been said that Shuttle's delta wings and large cargo bay were the result of USAF and NRO demands. However, this is somewhat of a myth, as those were in fact things that NASA wanted and when "asking" the Air Force about them it was more like "If we build the Shuttle this way, can you use that capability?" The Columbia Accident Investigation Board hearings, namely volume 6, appendix H, go into more detail on this topic. I propose a rework of that section of the article. Hal Nordmann (talk) 13:25, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  USAF influence on design process.
Talk:Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania

message: The introductory paragraph states that 84% of residents commute to work daily.  Firstly, the statement is not cited.  Secondly, it's a pretty unremarkable statistic as anyone who is employed (save those that work from their homes) commutes to work. I suspect that the person who added the sentence meant to comment on the fact that many of the borough's residents have a long commute to work (many residents work in NYC and northern NJ).  However, since I'm not a mind-reader and the statement is not cited, I'm removing it.  68.238.184.72 (talk) 20:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Commuters

message: Find a PA contour map on line, which will show elevations between 1200 and 3200 ft above sea level. Those areas might be considered plausible Pocono region. They exclude Stroudsburg.
17:24, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: ==Stroudsburg not in Poconos
Talk:Tottenham High Cross

message: I'm leaving it for now, but what does all the stuff about the almshouses etc have to do with the cross? Tarquin Binary 02:02, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting and plausible - definitely an important Xroads - need to cite something though. (Wonder what's buried there - was usually lucky to bury bodies or something at crossroads). Anyway, will fix the immediate thing soon, but will have to check where it might fit in the Tottenham entry first. Tarquin Binary 17:50, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm just going to delete that stuff, because the Tottenham piece is not too bad. I get the feeling that the screed here was just copy/pasted from another source, too, it has that vibe. Tarquin Binary 17:56, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Juiblex

message: "Juiblex" isn't an alternate spelling - it's the only correct spelling. "Jubilex" is a common error, but appears nowhere in official D&D products.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.82.65.54  (talk • contribs) 02:08, 1 February 2006  (UTC)
: Some brief google searching seems to support this view. Perhaps rename article to Juiblex, and make Jubilex redirect to it, instead. --Ch'marr 02:10, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it was spelt both ways in the 1st edition of the Monster Manual. I no longer have the book, so I cannot confirm it though. Deadlock 14:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I just checked, and its spelt Juiblex in the first edition AD&D Monster Manual (this edition). --Muchness 20:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah, well. Must be my memory playing tricks. It's certainly a well-spread error, though. Must have come from somewhere... Deadlock 11:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

text: A couple of folks I used to game with would pronounce it "Jubilex". So I'd say it like it was French, "Joo-ee-blay". Orcus only knows why... :) --Ebyabe 00:58, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

text: In the AD&D first edition Monster Manual 2, the index lists the entry as "Jubilex" (and points to the Monster Manual entry). 24.113.103.172 (talk) 20:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I would chalk that up to being a typo. 65.126.152.254 (talk) 21:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling
Talk:Disc film

message: *Is there room for a comment about the reliability of the cameras? All of the Disc cameras I ever owned (all Kodak) died horribly with the motor running out of control, but I don't know if there was a general problem with that or not. Haikupoet 02:11, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion 

message: How to make for scan the discs? Thank you for your answer. Hubert DhonteDhonte (talk) 13:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  scan 

message: Was this system the first negatives on disc technology in photography? 
This is a 1965 negatives on disc? 
https://scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xpf1/v/t1.0-9/12009659_1014816621914628_4696639617571813470_n.jpg?oh=eccc00ee5334ec3d9fe72f76409d7dd7&oe=56A1BBD6
EDLIS Café  21:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1st 
Talk:Mountain paca

message: Splitting of C. hernandezi from C. taczanowskii is not recognized by any of the major biological databases (such as IUCN, ITIS and MDD) or scientific papers other than the original description of C. hernandezi. Due to the lack of type material, type locality and precise description, C. hernandezi is nomen nudum (see Ramírez–Chaves & Solari, 2014). In my opinion, it would be better to move information about C. hernandezi to the mountain pack article until new information becomes available. Considering that over the past eight years there has been no response to criticism, a redescription may never appear. HFoxii (talk) 06:01, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 14:33, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal: ''[[Cuniculus hernandezi]]''
Talk:SS Valbanera

message: I've created a new version (copyvio free, I hope) of the article on the temp page. -- Dalbury(Talk) 02:17, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page was moved from "Valbanera" to "SS Valbanera" without discussion. The ship was never known as "SS Valbanera". As a Spanish owned and registered ship, it was referred to in Spanish as "vapor Valbanera", but all of the English sources I've seen refer to it as "Valbanera" without any prefix. I therefore propose to more it back to "Valbanera" in seven days if there is no objection stated. -- Donald Albury 10:14, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: As the editor who moved the article in the first place, I say that there is no need to move it back. It is the accepted convention that steamships are prefixed SS, per ship prefix and that article on steamships are generally housed at a "SS Foo" title. Mjroots (talk) 12:54, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

text: The Valbanera was a Spanish ship, and the prefix "SS" is not used in the sources about the ship. :Ship prefix is an article, not a naming convention. - Donald Albury 12:02, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Quite wrong. While Spanish it may have been, but this is English-language Wikipedia, and yes since SS stands for steamship Valbanera was definitely called that. For example, see Houston Post for March 24, 1907 where it is called SS Valbanera as any other steamship. Or a number of newspapers for September 1919 where it is called just that.Crook1 (talk) 13:06, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't agree, but I will not be pursuing this. - Donald Albury 20:28, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Return page to name ''Valbanera''

message: The Wrecks.eu site is crowd sourced, and needs to be removed. I found an article published by the Spanish Navy about the wreck of the Valbanera, but my Spanish is not good enough to accurately translate it. - Donald Albury 19:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needed work
Talk:Jewish settlement in the Japanese Empire

message: The lead is completely disassociated from the article. It says the whole thing is a fiction, but that is not supported by the text, except for the ambiguous 'as interpreted by' in the opening line of the first section. I'm removing all mention in the lead of this being fictionalized unless the text is modified to support it. — kwami (talk) 09:39, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead 
Talk:CineAlta

message: Not sure how to divice content between Digital cinematography and this page - I created it
* to be on the same level as Varicam which also has its own page
* to have those links in a regular place.
However, I really like the Digital cinematography and don't want to take anything away from it. Any ideas? Peter S. 02:19, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

message: The Sony Profesional Product page says some items like the PMW-300K is discontinued and market it on other days. The same thing happens with F65.
  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Apha9 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discontiued or Continued
Talk:Ojamajo Doremi

message: Please note that when a genre—or any content—is under dispute, it must have a reliable source per the verifiability policy before it can be included. Adding a genre simply because "you watched it" isn't enough. Such interpretations are a violation of Wikipedia's policy against original research. Original research is any material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist. This includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to advance a position not advanced by the sources. You can't call something a "tragedy" or "slice of life" if there are no reliable, published sources stating such. 24.149.117.220 (talk) 21:43, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres 

message: Just a heads-up before anything happens: Ojamajo Doremi 20 has not been confirmed by officially and fan reports are not a valid source. Only add this information once media outlets confirm this or Toei gives an official press release! lullabying (talk) 02:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ojamajo Doremi Twenties (20) 

message: The recent edit war suggests there is a disagreement as to whether the light novels are considered sequels. Please discuss before continuing to revert each other's edits. lullabying (talk) 01:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I know. Hence why I stopped because of 3RR. This is a debatable subject. As far as I know, there are no sources that prove the light novel series to be canon therefore a sequel to the regular TV series. To prevent false information, it's best to leave any unsourcced suggestions that it is out of the article and leave the article as-is. Rctgamer3 (talk) 20:41, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a bit hard to say. The novels were written by one of the series writers and there were CD drama adaptations of the books where the original cast was involved. What makes it not canon at this point? lullabying (talk) 20:46, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit war
Template talk:MTR

message: Some users have started deleting logos off station templates like this - this one has been left. Apparently it isn't fair use policy to include them on a template as such. Feel free to replace this with an appropriate image. The train picture used on the station signs would be a good non-copyrighted image to use instead. I've put the Disneyland resort picture there for the moment. (JROBBO 04:53, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of MTR Logo in template
Talk:Electrical tuning

message: I did research for this article, but it could probably stand a good looking over by someone more familiar with the issue to make sure I haven't gotten anything a little skewed.  Thanks, delldot | talk 02:26, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Electrical tuning is also used by us and other animals with long a cochlea, according to a dutch textbook by Dijkgraaf. The long cochlea is there for the high frequencies, but the low frequencies can be discerned by electrical tuning and there is some overlap at middle frequencies. Will take a look at it, to get some conformation sources in english articles.
Viridiflavus (talk) 00:24, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: request for checking out
Talk:Joseph V. Quarles

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Joseph Very Quarles was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 21:43, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot-created subpage
Talk:Goobuntu

message: I don't think this article is ever going to grow out of its stub status. It's about an internal project within Google that the organization has a policy of not discussing publicly.
Is there somewhere else we can merge this article, perhaps? —mako (talk•contribs) 18:14, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  permenant stub status 

message: "While both Google and Ubuntu's creator Mark Shuttleworth have confirmed..." We either need to name both or neither creators, because even theough I understand that you are in fact using 'Google' as a singular entity, the phrasing should be more along the lines of the following: "While both Google and Mark Shuttleworth, creator of Ubuntu, have confirmed..."
Centrisian (talk) 08:44, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor Grammar

message: http://www.pcworld.com/article/182890/google_partners_with_canonical_for_chrome_os.html
According to this article, Google and Canonical actually are close partners on a number of projects, and Ubuntu is no exception. I agree that Google is contributing back to Ubuntu, and I'm sure Google could easily advertise Ubuntu using Google Ads, YouTube, or even TV. This is very good news.
Kenny Strawn (talk) 20:28, 28 September, 2010 (Pacific time)  —Preceding undated comment added 03:58, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Canonical + Google = Friends

message: Is this article really needed? I don't think it meets the threshold of importance, since it is only used internally. Smihael (talk) 08:50, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance 

message: I propose to merge gLinux into Goobuntu. From what we publicly know, gLinux and Goobuntu are basically identical, other than the different distros, and serve the exact same purpose. It would also help lengthen this stub a bit. curcle. talk. 18:18, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Suwannee River Area Council

message: merge as per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting/RulesStandards. Our intent is not to delete anyone's work or to minimize the importance of any article that already exists on the Wikipedia.  Instead our goal is to tighten the information, to make it more relevant and useful for the general Wikipedian.  This article will be absorbed in its entirety to the larger state Scouting article. The newer article will encompass OA lodges, Councils, early nonBSA Scouting organizations like Campfire or Woodcraft, Girl Scouting where applicable, and other ideas as they come up. Chris 02:32, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:1797 State of the Union Address

message: Um, is it just me, or does the WikiSource link state the reference?  The speech itself would be the source for the article outlining the speech, yes?  --MPD01605 00:28, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References?

message: Shouldn't the title of this page be changed to 1797 State of the Union Address, as well as John Adams' Second State of the Union Address be changed to 1978 State of the Union Address, to conform with the convention Wikipedia has for 2002 addresses on? If no one objects, I'm just going to change it. VolatileChemical 16:38, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title