lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Giulio Caccini

message: I am going to attempt to clean up this article over the next few weeks. Anyone who is watching this page and wants to help, let me know.
I did notice the statement, "...the Camerata developed the concept of monody..." I think that the word "codified" might be a better term. There were several musical forms that were popular in Italy that were very close to monody (such as the frottola). The actual amount of innovation rather than documentation that the camerata (and Caccini) did has been a debated subject. I will dig though my articles and see if I can find the exact sources for the dispute (other than talking to my professors in the halls about it). Jmclark (talk) 11:33, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning up

message: The "Caccini Ave Maria", elaborately scored, either by Nick Ingman or George Brinums, revived by Inessa Galante and sung by Andrea Boccelli, Charlotte Church, et al., is now surely the most familiar music with a Caccini connection. It needs to be dealt with in this article more professionally than I could do. --Wetman (talk) 20:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As I know, "Ave Maria" was nor revived, but attributed to Caccini in early 1970's in USSR. First time, when Caccini's name was writen, Irina Arkhipova sing it. Then it was "exported" in Europe by Galante (latvian singer, who knows Arkhipova works very good). It was hoax by Vladimir Vavilov, who cannot publish records by his own name and attributed his works to not very known italian composers or anonymous. So, first time "Ave Maria" appeared on the album "Lute Music of the XVI-XVII centuries" on the Soviet "Melodia" label with the attribution to “Anonymous”. More in Vladimir Vavilov and Inessa Galante pages and there. Sorry for my English. 178.165.100.159 (talk) 00:15, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

text: What I meant was he would have been disinclined to write it.  Maybe "alien" was not the best word.  Antandrus  (talk) 02:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Caccini Ave Maria

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This is a pretty good article, but I expected to read more about how his musical innovations in opera influenced others.  That and other issues are in my review on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 20:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Thomas Slingsby Duncombe

message: It pained me to see Thomas Slingsby Duncombe as a stub so I've added some content. When I get more time I plan on dividing into sub-heads and activating links (unless anyone else wants to...) Stay tuned. --stephen duncombe 16:27, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding content to Thomas Slingsby Duncombe entry 

message: Added subheads, next comes the links.stephen duncombe 00:17, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional content 
Talk:Thomas S. Wootton

message: I don't know how to reword the sentence/phrase re: breaking with the naming convention, but Richard Montgomery was not an American. He was an Irish-born soldier who later came to the colonies and was a key figure in the American revolution (for the independence side), however he died in 1775. I don't think in any sense he can be called "an American" (though no doubt he was instrumental in American independence). Can someone re-write the sentence/phrase to something like 'named after figures popular in America'?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:A:3382:596C:2D57:6CD:2927:1681 (talk) 18:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Montgomery was not an American
Talk:Ugolino della Gherardesca

message: Ugolino and Dante basically covers the same content, relating Ugolino's life in history and legend. Str1977 (talk) 09:01, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The line "In 2008, Paola Benigni, superintendent to the Archival Heritage of Tuscany, disputed Mallegni's findings in an article, claiming that the documents assigning the burial to Ugolino and his descendants were Fascist-era forgeries" doesn't make much sense. Paola isn't disputing Mallegni's findings, which were that the bodies he found are of a father and his kin that are very probably of the Gherardesca family, nor does the assertion that the burial documents were forged have anything directly to do with Mallegni's findings. I don't even know how to word the problem with the quoted line; it just sounds off.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.60.202.174 (talk) 04:03, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Scientific analysis of the remains" confusion
Talk:Gustave Reese

message: If you're going to add students, add ones which have significance. -- kosboot (talk) 04:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Students 
Talk:Emilio de' Cavalieri

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; it could use a works list, more inline citations, and a better indication of where he went after Florence. My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 15:03, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review

message: I have removed :File:G. M. Milizio, Cappella de' Cavalieri a Santa Maria in Aracoeli1.jpg from the head of the article. It was misidentified as a bust of Emilio de' Cavalieri. It is actually the bust of Giovanni Battista Milizio de Cavalieri on his tomb in the Cappella de' Cavalieri in the Santa Maria in Aracoeli church in Rome. This is quite clear not only from the file information, but also from the complete image of the tomb and its inscription at :File:Cappella de' Cavalieri a Santa Maria in Aracoeli.jpg and :File:Santa Maria in Aracoeli Grabmal G B Milizio.JPG. This mis-identification had been propagated all over the internet thanks to Wikipedia. Voceditenore (talk) 10:12, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image removed 
Talk:Jacopo Corsi

message: ----
Are we sure that whoever wrote this article is not confusing Corsi with Jacopo Peri? He wrote both Dafne, generally recognised as the first opera, although the music is lost, and one of the versions of Euridice, the first opera of which we still have the score and libretto (the other version is by Giulio Caccini, who apparently wrote much of Peri's version). I would have thought Corsi is better known as Vincenzo Galilei's other patron and rival of Bardi. He did sponsor/fund Dafne, and it is possible that he contributed to it, but now we really need an expert, i.e. not me OsmNacht (talk) 13:55, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

message: Just want to know, is the main problem questioning whether the entire article itself is fake INCLUDING the person's existence and historical presence, or are we questioning whether most of the information provided by the article is fake (but the person is real)? 
 
RandomEditorAAA (talk) 02:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps a dumb question, sorry but...
Talk:Philippe de Monte

message: It is mentioned as a specific accomplishment that Philippe de Monte sang for the Grand Duke of Tuscany, Fernando de' Medici. Somehow that does not strike me as standing out among the accomplishments of this composer. Ferdinando I de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany only succeeded to the throne of the Grand Duchy in 1587, by which time Monte was 65 or 66 and renowned all over Europe. Fernando probably had many people singing in performances at the court. I don't have access to the cited source (Mann 1983, p.5. ), which may perhaps explain more why this is a noteworthy accomplishment. Without further explanation this mention seems slightly odd.  --Lambiam 10:32, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for noticing; I took it out.  Adding cited "facts" to this article was an undergraduate music history class project at Union University, Jackson, Tennessee in December 2007, and unfortunately it seems we never cleaned it up (the students did not always have the proper perspective to determine what was an "accomplishment" worthy of mention at the top of a paragraph).  According to Robert Lindell's article in the current New Grove, Monte mentioned in the introduction to his 1600 Il pastor fido that he sang for Ferdinando de' Medici in 1566, but that's not one of his major accomplishments by any means. Antandrus  (talk) 14:02, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singing for the Grand Duke
Talk:Giaches de Wert

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This is a really nice article; close to A level.  With work it might even make FA; my full review is on the comments page.  Questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 16:50, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Thomas Tredwell

message: There is a conflict as to when  Thomas Tredwell began his representation of .  He replaced James Townsend who died.
* According to 2nd United States Congress, he began on October 24, 1791.
* According to Thomas Tredwell, he began April 26, 1791.
* According to , he began April 26, 1791.
* According to the Bioguide, he began "May 1791."
These articles need to have the same correct information and I don't know which one to believe.  Any suggestions??  —Markles 10:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Congressional service dates conflict
Talk:Thomas Tresham (speaker)

message: Something's wrong with some of the dates in the first paragraph; dates in the 1470s postdate Tresham's death. Choess (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ach, errors on my part; thanks for noticing them :). Ironholds 17:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:Thomas Tresham (died 1559)

message: Actually, the History of Parliament which comes from The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1509-1558, ed. S.T. Bindoff, 1982 states three sons and one daughter. And other sources state that his wife was Mary Parr, not Anne (this includes Douglas Richardson and Burke's Peerage). -- Lady Meg (talk) 22:19, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children
Talk:Adrian Willaert

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This is a pretty good B-class article; it mainly wants a complete works list.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 17:30, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Thomas W. Cobb

message: Would make sense. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HunterSGuthrie (talk • contribs) 02:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Al Stump's book about Ty Cobb, talked about Ty remembering all this relatives with Thomas Cobb one of them.  Not sure of the exact relation though as the book does not say. --Roswell native 03:40, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Any Relation to Ty Cobb? 

message: No mention of slave-owning. I feel that this category should be restricted to people whose slave-owning history was notable in itself. Valetude (talk) 12:42, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:American slave owners
Talk:Thomas Waite (regicide)

message: Could someone who is a bit more technically competent kindly assist in providing a disambiguation page or link to differentiate from Thomas Waite (Under-Secretary for Ireland)
Many thanks in advance RashersTierney (talk) 18:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have deleted and recreated this article.
This is because Wikipedia Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License allows commercial distribution, but the current licence used by the British Civil War website is Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which places a restriction "Non-Commercial — You may not use this work for commercial purposes." which the Wikipedia license does not.
Providing the requirements of the Terms of Use and WP:plagiarism are met there is no reason why information from the British Civil War website can not be summarised and and cited like any other copyright text. But it can not be copied under its copyleft licence into Wikipedia articles because its licence is more restrictive than the Wikipedia licence. --PBS (talk) 14:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyleft problems
Talk:Color histogram

message: In my opinion, the example table isn't thorough enough. By reading the article, I really have no idea what it means... is that a table for some sample image, or what? Mattpat 12:43, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems to be an example from who knows where.  I kept it, but put some words in front of it for what it might mean. Dicklyon 01:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table needs clarification 

message: The article says that "color histogram should not be confused with image histogram", implying that the former is used only for color spaces with two or more dimensions, while the latter is exclusively for monochromatic images (or a single channel of a color image).Methinks that this distinction is false.  Perhaps some authors define things that way; but Wikipedia should follow common usage, not the favorite definition of a particular author or community.IMHO, if we consider the views of all people who use those terms, we can only say that "image histogram" is a generic term for any histogram derived from the image pixels; while "color histogram" is a histogram of the color values of the image, whatever its color space is. So:
* for monochromatic images, "color histogram" and "image histogram" are both valid and mean the same thing;
* for images with N≥2 color channels, "color histogram" usually means an N-dimensional histogram; and "image histogram" may be either the same thing, or any lower-dimensional histogram of some color attribute(s), such as luminance, single channel, hue/sat pairs, etc..
Would you agreee?All the best, --Jorge Stolfi (talk) 13:08, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color histogram vs. image histogram 
Talk:Andrea Gabrieli

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; it would benefit from a suitable image, a complete works list, and more inline citations.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 15:25, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review

message: The image of Andrea Gabrieli: I sincerely doubt that this is an image of Andrea Gabrieli. It suddenly appeared on the internet (i think around 2009) but without mentioning any source...
problem is: this image has become viral 
Either the source should be found / or it should be removed -- or mentioned that source is not established.. 'supposed to be Andrea etc.)
--Counterpartner (talk) 10:27, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I think you're right. Removed. Antandrus (talk) 20:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image of Andrea Gabrieli 
Talk:Death Comes for the Archbishop

message: Good grief. Could this entry be more anti-Catholic and anti-Christian? What a disgrace. Xphilosopherking (talk) 21:40, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Parola Tank Museum

message: isn't the name "The Armour Museum" in English? I suggest that this article should be moved to Finnish Armour Museum. MoRsE 12:53, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine by me.  I used Parola Tank Museum as it occurs on the museum website.  If someone can translate the Finnish name better, that would be great. Balcer 13:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I see...hmm, I was just looking at the museum web page, there in the first page it says "The Armour Museum, but if you click on the link "in English" it says the "The Tank Museum" :/ ...they are not even uniform on their own home page... Well, I will leave it like this and create a redirect from the armour museum. MoRsE 13:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I noticed the official webpage is confusing.  Since I don't know any Finnish, at this point either option is fine with me. Balcer 14:04, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Timothy Matlack

message: Declare_(typeface) redirects here, so where is the information about it? -- 97.94.196.110 (talk) 20:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Declare (Typeface)

message: " He was a delegate to the Conference of Committees which met in June to plan for the Convention which would write a new constitution for Pennsylvania. These laws were to form the basis of a new government. That night, Matlack likely attended John Dunlap's print shop, and printed copies of the declaration were ready by morning. Later that month Matlack engrossed the Declaration of Independence on parchment. "
Obviously, someone deleted a sentence they didnt' like for the usual stupid hypercritical reason. There needs to be an extra sentence before the words "That night ..." to introduce the Declaration (NOT the Pennsylvania Constitution). This is typical for wiki edits -- remove something you don't like for some stupid reason and then leave the context incomprehensible.2600:1700:A3A0:1630:C0EC:DF19:B5C1:DB96 (talk) 04:37, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  this makes no sense -- please correct it with a transition
Talk:Tobias Lear

message: Need to extend article beyond appointment at Hatti and cover the Barbary wars and his involvement there.  Also, I think he was married at third time during the Barbary wars to another Washington niece also nicknamed Fanny. (Zacks 2005) WilliamKF 16:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: To do

message: - How could he have remarried Fanny when there is no mention of him being married to her previously?
: He married for a second time to a different woman.  Text updated to clarify this. WilliamKF 20:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added footnotes to harvard references for readability. WilliamKF 20:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

text: See section on Tobias Lear#Missing Washington papers and following section on Tobias Lear#Jefferson as ally. WilliamKF 20:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, needs to be continued. WilliamKF 20:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Your library probably has the Zacks 2005 book or audio version of it. WilliamKF 20:48, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorial questions/comments
Talk:Toby Harris, Baron Harris of Haringey

message: the Biography from the London Assembly is no longer available, so it is removed, but I put it here for future reference. J.P.Lon 19:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead Link in References/External Links
Talk:George Washington Vanderbilt III

message: The unreferenced articles George Washington Vanderbilt III and George Washington Vanderbilt II have some conflicting references if you go look.  These reference show "III" being applied to the one who died in 1914 not the one born in 1914. If any there any experts on the subject with solid references your help would be greatly appreciated in referencing these two articles Jeepday (talk) 17:56, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference conflict

message: I appreciate your concerns about the naming accuracy. However, I don't know what to say about the change from "George Washington Vanderbilt III" to the current title. This isn't an offense to your good-faith contributions. However, once the RM discussion at Talk:George Washington Vanderbilt II is over, we can deal with this III/IV matter then. Fair? --George Ho (talk) 07:18, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:   No worries. Apologies accepted. You can check this later right after finding sources to verify your claims. Maybe you can write a book instead about previous generations. Thoughts? --George Ho (talk) 02:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent move 
Talk:Butterworth, South Africa

message: As google street view came out today it helped by showing whether names are now used on signs. Butterworth (Gcuwa) was one of the few towns (along with Nelspruit) where a name change hasn't yet caused road signs to change. Cities such as Mthatha/Polokwane/Mookgopong etc. have already catched on and are on signs. Butterworth is still used on signs. If no one else cares to discuss shortly then I will move it. Bezuidenhout (talk) 13:22, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request Move 

message: We don't have water in Butterworth Mqwaiyto (talk) 03:42, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water crisis
Talk:Kahn process networks

message: This is a bit misleading: standard Petri nets cannot express FIFOs, so a KPN as a whole does not correspond to a Petri net. Rp (talk) 15:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Process firing semantics as Petri nets 

message: The state machine and the Petri net disagree on whether the execution of a process upon reading a token may write multiple tokens to its output.  The textual description isn't clear on this. Rp (talk) 15:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting diagrams 

message: The Petri net diagram doesn't describe what to do when there are multiple output channels. Rp (talk) 15:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple outputs? 

message: Are cycles allowed?  Can two processes read or write to the same FIFO?  (Presumably not.)
Do we really have just blank "tokens" or are they distinguishable, do they carry data for instance?  The article doesn't say. Rp (talk) 15:01, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formalisation welcome 

message: *"Timing or execution order of processes must not affect the result and therefore testing input channels for tokens is forbidden."
Why should testing input channels always have an effect on timing or execution order?
*"The single token in the PE resource place forbids that the process is executed simultaneously for different input data."
What does PE stand for and why resource?
Thanks, --Abdull (talk) 09:13, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forbidden channel testing and ''PE resource'' 

message: The references in this article ( except one I added ) are all written as flat text. These should be inlined at the right points with ref tags. Unixtastic (talk) 02:04, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference problems
Talk:Tokamak (software)

message: All of the information on this physics engine comes from the Tokamak site - with permission from the author.  I've toned down the blatent advertising stuff but retained the list of features and major claims for the package. SteveBaker 13:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since May 2007, it has been open-sourced (under a BSD License). Does somebody know why the version on the main site is 1.25, but the version that can be downloaded on sourceforge is 1.0.0 ? Hervegirod 11:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Version

message: Main website's domain, tokamakphysics.com, appears to have been parked by a third party. It's a generic spam "news" page now.
78.58.132.27 (talk) 15:34, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Links
Talk:Thomas Yarborough

message: Yarborough was elected mayor of Lake Elsinore in 1966, according to multiple sources. The timeline on the city's website has him being elected mayor in 1964. This may be where the "first" claim arises, although George Carroll (judge) was elected as mayor of Richmond, California in early 1964, so even a 1964 election for Yarborough wouldn't guarantee it. One of the sources states "When elected to the Lake Elsinore City Council in 1948, Yarborough was the first African American to be voted into that office in California". I have edited the lead sentence to reflect that source. Polycarpa aurata (talk) 17:52, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim of being first African-American mayor of a California city
Talk:Tomás Martínez

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not Moved(closed by non-admin page mover)  Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 17:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Tomás Martínez →  – not a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 01:50, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 15 August 2020