lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:WJAR

message: In this segment, it says:
 "For most of its history, WJAR has led the market with its top-rated newscasts. This can be attributed to being the oldest television station in Rhode Island and associated early on with two well established radio stations. For February and May 2010 Nielsen Ratings period, this station was number one in all time slots. Its weeknight 6 o'clock show reached a reported 71,000 households which was an advantage of nearly 20,000 over nearest competitor WPRI. For the key audience measure of adult 18-49 and adult 25-54 viewers, WJAR out-delivered the competition in virtually all of its newscasts." 
However this is information from Neilsen which is typically considered "client exclusive" (not published). Also the numbers and information in this are incorrect. In May 2010, WJAR was not number one in all time slots, WPRI beat WJAR in both demos and HouseHolds at 11 in May 2010. The nearly 71,000 number and 20,000 numbers refer to the 6pm newscast in the February book ONLY.
The May book numbers were different. (And again, not public record.)
Again, though, this information is not considered public and unless a reference can be provided, statements like this are strictly hearsay and don't meet the standards of Wikipedia, and should be removed or made much more generic and less sounding like a sales-pitch for WJAR-TV   NECRATSpeak to me 21:37, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resource needed 

message: I just cut everyone out of the alumni section that does not have their own Wikipedia page or have a reference to establish their notability.  In the case of this article, that left no one left, so I removed the whole section.  This is the current consensus procedure, based on discussions at WP:WikiProject Television Stations and at the Village Pump. The rationales are as follows:
#Most importantly, per WP:NOT, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#Secondarily, per WP:V, we cannot include information that is not verifiable and sourced.  I'm not certain how it would even be possible to source this information.
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
#Per WP:NLIST, lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
All of the people with their own pages are notable enough to appear on this list.  However, if you look at pages about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of info, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). Qwyrxian (talk) 14:27, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of Past Staff
Talk:Iago (Aladdin)

message: an homage to the villain of William Shakespeare's Othello.
Isn't that rather grandly pretentious? He has the same name as the Shakespeare character, and is also a baddie. So? The TV series Bewitched has an enchanted vintage automobile called Macbeth that is literally hag-ridden: does that make it an homage, or just a rip-off?
Nuttyskin (talk) 00:50, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homage? 
Talk:WJCL (TV)

message: WJCL (TV) → WJCL – Rationale: no need for "(TV)" in article name.
===Survey===
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support. If someone is trying to find an article on WJCL, 99% of the time they will be searching for the television station. Jaxfl (talk) 03:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Add any additional comments
*Why not set up the article to look like this?:
Plus, with WJCL 22 making their debut as the station featured on TV Guide's Making News this summer, there will be more and more people researching the station. Jaxfl (talk) 03:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support. If someone is trying to find an article on WJCL, 99% of the time they will be searching for the television station. Jaxfl (talk) 03:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Add any additional comments
*Why not set up the article to look like this?:
Plus, with WJCL 22 making their debut as the station featured on TV Guide's Making News this summer, there will be more and more people researching the station. Jaxfl (talk) 03:11, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:WJHG-TV

message: please do this for me.Iknow election day is tomorrow. But Jackson county would like for you to cover the election for Jackson county veiwers. thank you very much. Krystal Kirkland-Cottondale,Fla.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krystal kirkland (talk • contribs) 23:43, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  help!! 

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 02:23, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material
Talk:WMLW-TV

message: I was told by station management that the call letters will not formally be changed until the week after the change was made here, so someone jumped the gun. Nitelinger (talk) 15:35, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Both WBME-TV (49) and WMLW-CA (41) swapped channel positions on Tuesday August 9. As of now, the call sign change has yet to show on the FCC's web site. The on-screen guide, and some of the automated online programming guides, show the stations as WBME-CD (41) and WMLW-DT (49). But my personal rule (and I'm sure what Wikipedia prefers) is not to redirect the pages or insert the new call sign until it shows up on the FCC's website, for official verification purposes. Until then, the pages in this regard should stay as-is. --Fightingirish (talk) 11:00, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Channel swap 

message: Mrschimpf: "WMLW's main signal has been downgraded to 480i" Is it still in HD on cable? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:43, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That's how I'm seeing it on Spectrum in 480i SD; according to the JS article there's an SD simulcast on WDJT-DT3, so that might be what I'm seeing. I'm trying to confirm it through a visible station ID. Nate • (chatter) 02:03, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Confirmed; I am seeing the WDJT-DT3 simulcast for now (Spectrum seemed completely unprepared for the move this morning and had to scramble; I'm still getting WCGV where Comet usually is, for instance, and for some reason, MeTV, which had ZERO changes, is carrying WMVS, plus the 63.2 This move was completely unannounced; Tribune must've found a way to hold Weigel to their contract). Hopefully all will be back to normal soon. Nate • (chatter) 03:08, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer in HD?
Talk:WJXT

message: I removed the portion of the article alledging that Richard Nixon had ordered the FCC to investigate the Post owned TV stations. I could not find any verifiable source this actually occured. If you can find a source please revert to the original article AND site the source, otherwise it's just speculation and gossip and does not belong in the Wikipedia
4.142.78.224 18:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Not including this type of material in articles abides by current consensus and is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). thanks Deconstructhis (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: Why does this page have the message "Not to be confused with ABC affiliate WJXX." at the top of it? I would hope no one would confuse WJXX and WJXT. It just seems a little ridiculous to me.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathew105601 (talk • contribs) 12:57, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This seems a little ridiculous
Talk:WJXX

message: Please provide documented information about Albritton's rationale for the cited affiliation deal, as well as on the fate of WBSG (as per WP:V).  Amnewsboy 10:43, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Albritton Involvement

message: First Coast News debuted a new logo combining the ABC and NBC logos in the fall of 2017. The new individual station logos are as follows:
* A logo containing the letters NBC, a number 12, and the NBC peacock next to the callsign for WTLV.
* A logo containing the ABC logo and the callsign for WJXX.
Does anyone have any of those new logos? J4lambert (talk) 21:53, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo change necessary

message: WJXX debuted a new logo in 2021.
The link is here: https://scontent-ord5-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.6435-9/136752540_10158984912658987_4443494321407449166_n.jpg?_nc_cat=101&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=9267fe&_nc_ohc=ZxYAgMEsVPIAX8qsWny&_nc_ht=scontent-ord5-1.xx&oh=00_AT92rCjtOdpyV0Z2vaAfxsI5GWxYWKayidm9lRrLmBeAKw&oe=637D90BD Brainyshark03 18:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New WJXX logo
Talk:Diana E. H. Russell

message: I have deleted both of Diana Russell's Vitas because they were in too big a mess. If anyone wants a lot of information to cull from about her please look in the history for the article page as well as this talk page and you will find them unedited and not well formatted. I can't figure out what to do with it. --Nikkicraft 17:08, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the bibliography really "selected" anymore? If that's just a relatively small selection of her works, she must have written a ton. Hbackman 02:28, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography 
Talk:Oldsmobile Alero

message: The class of this car is a compact, it seems. I don't understand why. I drive a 2004 Alero GL sedan. It has a V6 engine and its size, to me, classifies it as a mid-size sedan, not a compact. A Mazda3 or Ford Focus, for example, are compacts. They are smaller and have 4-cylinder engines. I, to date, have never seen a compact car with a V6 engine. S3BST3R 06:43, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Compact?

message: Okay, I can't remember if it's the 5.3 or northstar, but the Aleros came with a v8 in coupe and sedan mated to a fourspeed auto. Also between 2003 & 2004, they did get a bodystyle change, mostly the front and rear. The front was flattened some like the Grand Am.
His Life as a... 15:31, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Engine and bodystyle

message: What does "Alero" mean? Is it some word that they just made up, or does it come from some sort of source?
 
^ - It's a nigerian name meaning "Grace of the Land"
I want to buy chvrolet  alero  duster ,where  can I buy it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.102.155.217 (talk) 12:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Andrew Chan

message: Question about Andrew:
Does anyone know if Andrew Chan ever used the name Jimmy Chan in the past?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.189.217.40 (talk) 01:42, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WKAR-TV

message: I was just wondering if there should be any mention of the fire that burned down the Quonset hut studio just as the station was finishing the move to the new Communication Arts Building?  (I'm a little too young to remember it myself, but my father told me about it, and I did see a clip of it on one of the station's anniversary specials...) rdfox 76 (talk) 19:26, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quonset fire?
Talk:WKNO (TV)

message: Hi -- I work at WKNO and yes we aired Nova Judgment Day in January 2008.  We're repeating it again this coming February.  These were all published schedules. There's no big mystery about whether it's aired or not. (66.162.20.126 (talk) 22:42, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "It is unknown..."
Talk:WKOW

message: *Cleaned up the on-air & former personalities section of the site
*I'm also working on expanding the page from historical documents that are at the station
--Achernow (talk) 22:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd Clean-up 

message: Wow. This page looks absolutely terrible.
I'm removing the photo gallery; the images are largely redundant and horrifyingly formatted. I'll leave the old logo, since it is significantly different than the current one. The old slogans can be posted in their own section, sans photos. Kafziel 00:38, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: On the WISN-TV page they state information about their digital conversion taking place on Feb. 17, 2009. If you have information about WKOW and their conversion, please add to the page. Below is the segment taken directly from WISN-TV's wikipage. I would like to have something like this on the WKOW wikipage, but the information is needed. 
Digital television
Channel    	Programming
12.1 / 34.1	main WISN-TV/ABC programming
Post-analog shutdown
After the analog television shutdown and digital conversion, which is tentatively scheduled to take place on February 17, 2009, http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf WISN-TV will remain on its current pre-transition channel number, 34. http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/cdbs/forms/prod/cdbsmenu.hts?context=25&appn=101230927&formid=387&fac_num=65680 However, through the use of PSIP, digital television receivers will display WISN-TV's virtual channel as 12.
--Wisconsineditor (talk) 09:50, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info needed on digital conversion.  
Talk:WKRG-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 02:18, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: Because of its fortuitous proximity to the relatively flat curved coastline and its average 650 ft HAAT, the WKRG broadcast signal and the piggybacked Amateur Radio transmitter W4IAX ( http://www.w4iax.net ) can both be received 80-150 miles away under normal conditionshttp://www.w4iax.net, and sometimes much further away, depending on atmospheric conditions and the receiving equipment and antennas.
2602:63:C3E6:4400:BE30:5BFF:FEB7:2216 (talk) 15:30, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadcast Range 

message: Any word on WKRG's promulgation of the anti-Semitic hoax voicemail purporting to be from WaPo? The Atlantic article I read made it sound like they were the first major outlet to break that "story." Is this notable? I guess time will tell. --W0lfie (talk) 18:45, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roy Moore 

message: The former WKRG broadcast tower was demolished last night shown at .  Can someone update the article about where and how they broadcast today? 73.18.200.241 (talk) 20:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  WKRG tower demolition
Talk:WLAJ

message: There is way too much of this article that is either written from an insider's point of view (without verified sources as per WP:V) or is simply opinion or speculation. Amnewsboy (talk) 15:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup 2/08

message: I find that the Suzanne Wangler information, although interesting and tragic, is quite irrelevant to an article that is specifically written about WLAJ. Wangler anchored or reported at several television stations -- not just WLAJ.
I suggest either deleting the Suzanne Wangler information all together, or moving it to its own page that is specifically about Suzanne. Reborn100 (talk) 01:20, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should remain, because her actions, made WLAJ part of the news.  If you listen to any report, they are saying "WLAJ" not "a Lansing TV Station".  It should remain, as it is part of the WLAJ history now. - Tehunknown (talk) 01:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

text: A quick WhoIS search shows the above user's IP is registered to WLAJ.  To answer your question, please direct your question to Amnewsboy as he was the one who removed your previous posts. --Tehunknown (talk) 04:45, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

text: You are correct, the article is about WLAJ...but the embezzlement case, her resignation, and her death all happened while (and after) she was at WLAJ.  Much like the Alycia Lane saga at KYW-TV is now a part of KYW's history (albeit a small part), this will be a small part of WLAJ's history.  The large amount of information is due to this happening recently.  As all the details are confirmed and brought to light, we will be able to condense the section into probably a sentence or two as part of the history. -- Tehunknown (talk) 05:53, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Suzanne Wangler Info 2/24
Talk:WLBZ

message: I do not have a reference but I know for a fact that WLBZ's master control is now run out of WCSH in Portland. I believe they consolidated it several years ago. I have not changed the article. Celliot2 (talk) 23:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Master Control
Talk:WLII-DT

message: Check this clip out. 
The beginning of this clip says:
Translated into English, it says:
I know that 11 was WKBM and is now WLII in Caguas and San Juan and 9 is WSUR in Ponce. But what I want to know is... Whatever happened to 8 and 44 and which areas did they serve??? WIKIVUE Detroit (talk) SAT SEP 15 2007 9:50 PM EDT
Do we really need *that* much information in the infobox? The thing takes up half the page now. Kimmykun 19:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Telecadena Perez-Perry 

message: I performed a copy edit and removed the  banner. Please feel free to re-add if more copy editing is needed. I'm quite new to this so if you do so, please let me know what I missed! TitanAndromeda (talk) 19:11, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy Edit 

message: As evidenced by the latest updates on the WLII-DT page, the station is now producing over 25 hours of local programming during weekdays and the amount of original programming on the WLII page may be overcrowding the stations main Wikipedia entry. I propose creating separate pages for the station's original programs such as "Jugando Pelota Dura", "La Boveda De Teleonce", "PR En Vivo", "El Poder del Pueblo" and "Las Noticias". Other local shows such as "La Comay" and "Tu Mañana" already have their own pages and there is enough information available on these shows to warrant separate pages for each. PR2021 (talk) 18:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separating original local shows into different pages 

message: ater = after 2603:8000:D300:3650:AD45:E6EE:7A8:8B7C (talk) 13:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:16, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2024