lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Equity swap

message: Stock swap and Equity swap are two different concepts, the articles should not be merged.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hyphy1380 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't merge

message: Just my 2¢.  Many thanks for the article, this will help me along. Fran Six (talk) 03:09, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Thanks
Talk:Essex County Fire and Rescue Service

message: This article needs an info box which can be cut and pasted from the LFB article (when all the relvant deatils are known) Escaper27 13:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added an infobox. --TBM10 (talk) 19:36, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs info box

message: I suggest the IP reads WP:NOT#NEWS. In additon, the information is both unsourced and non-notable. ninety:one 23:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  News
Talk:Colleen Moore

message: I think the main picture should be replaced by one with her hair bobbed that represents her "flapper" years, which she is famous for.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rod980 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral POV 

message: When did she start using that hairstyle ? Any story about it ? --  Beardo (talk) 00:22, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The bob hair 

message: It's not nine square feet- it's 9 feet square! That's a huge difference (900% by volume, actually). I think the height is correct. Somebody please change. 2603:6000:DC00:7A92:6133:AE86:4F5D:A212 (talk) 21:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Per this  reference, which I found in the Dollhouse article and added to this page, it is indeed 9 square feet. Please find a reliable source to support your claim. Siawase (talk) 14:49, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fairy Castle
Talk:The Anatomy of Melancholy

message: The article states, without a footnote, that The Anatomy of Melancholy was first published in 1621.  I found a mention of this in one of the quotes listed on the complete-review.com entry linked from the page. The quote, "... Upon completing the first folio in 1621, Burton ..." is cited as coming from a book review by  "Arthur Krystal" in "The New York Times Book Review" on July 20, 1986.  The title is not given.  The only mention I've been able to find of this book review is an abstract in the ProQuest National Newspapers Core database(Document ID: 8906542), available (with a library card) via the LAPL.  It agrees with the above citation data, and provides the title as: "Fretting, chafing, sighing, weeping — A toast to the melancholic writer", and the page number as 3.  I haven't been able to find any mentions of the review in Google or the NY Times' archive. I haven't been able to find a copy of the full text anywhere, yet. JesseW, the juggling janitor 03:27, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First publication date -- from NYTimes Book Review article 
Talk:Asia America Multitechnology Association

message: Reverted edit where the entire page was replaced with text copied from the company website. -- Whpq 16:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: *Could someone create a profile for the current President is William A. Chen? Thanks! Jccort (talk) 17:51, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for article
Talk:Mayerling (Producers' Showcase)

message: So, this article is very odd. It says there was only a kinescope record of the live television performance, but also says it was "released theatrically as a film in Europe" with a note referring to an IMDB page. On that page, we learn "A re-edited version of this episode was released theatrically in Europe and thus is often listed among Audrey Hepburn's films." This seems to be in direct contradiction to the statement "it was not thought the production had a future beyond the single live network broadcast; only a few prints were made, which were loaned, not given, to a few people involved with the production", unless the European theatre release was done after the remastering for DVD. The note on IMDB refers one to a website called "Films Around the World" (https://www.filmsaroundtheworld.com/Golden_Age_of_TV.html}, which is expired, but I found the DVD for sale on Amazon.com, with little information, but a note saying "Release date: ‎July 31, 2013", and a first review dated July 1st 2013, however that might work. If there really was a European theatrical release of that version would seem doubtful, as it was just a cleaned up B&W kinescope, which wouldn't attract much interest in the 21st century. Certainly stronger evidence for that statement is required.  2001:56A:F0E9:9B00:C901:DCA4:A37F:14F1 (talk) 08:29, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film, or not?
Talk:Crunode

message: I've never heard the term crunode in my life.  Is there a relation to node?  The picture depicts what most people would call a node, not a crunode.  The stuff about the Hessian contradicts the picture.  This article is in serious trouble.--345Kai (talk) 07:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes the info about the Hessian was wrong, somehow it didn't get corrected last time it was pointed out. I think the term is a little dated, but it is well sourced in certain parts of the literature.--Salix (talk): 17:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crunode? 

message: There is a vector image available . Is it not enough?Electron Kid (talk) 23:59, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image quality
Talk:Stephen Hunt (author)

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :SF Crowsnest. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 26#SF Crowsnest until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "SF Crowsnest" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Sfcrowsnest. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 26#Sfcrowsnest until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:31, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sfcrowsnest" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
MediaWiki talk:Cascadeprotectedwarning

message: The contents of this message is not fully correct. If a page is protected so that only register user can edit the page, and the protection has the cascade option turned on, then the included pages can be edited by a register user, but not by an anonymous. So it is not true that the page can be edited only by administrators.
:AnyFile 16:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, you're right. =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

text: There was a bug open on this, but I can't seem to duplicate this fix.  e.g. User:Xaosflux/JUPE is cascade sprotecting User:Xaosflux/Sandbox2, but when logged in with an autoconfirmed non-admin account I can't edit it. — xaosflux Talk 16:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

message: A discussion to standardise the styles for boxes of this kind has been started at Template talk:Fmbox#New type?.
--David Göthberg (talk) 12:47, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardised styles 

message: Change the full protection lock to a cascade protection lock. 41.254.65.251 (talk) 17:50, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: {{done} updated to use :File:Cascade-protection-shackle.svg. — xaosflux Talk 14:25, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 18 July 2021
Talk:Systemic (amateur extrasolar planet search project)

message: I just created this article, but I'm honestly not certain if I named it correctly. Feel free to move this with a more appropriate name. Hiberniantears 17:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is the name of the software.... the website is called "systemic - characterizing extrasolar planetary systems" so it seems pretty good to me.--Smkolins 00:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Name
Talk:British Empire in fiction

message: As the works are in chronological order anyway, I feel it’s a bit pointless having them listed as “contemporary” and “modern”. I also dislike the fact we have alternate histories mixed in with dramatizations and sci-fi. Therefore I’ve changed the structure to have “Historical Events”, “Period Fiction”, “Fantastical Fiction” and “Alternative Histories” as the heading. I’m not overly happy with these titles, so please change them if anyone can think of something better. Finally if anyone’s really upset about the change of structure, I’ll change it back… Phunting 17:01, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I take your point, but I think a dedicated section would be overly specific to one rather obscure genre. I've changed the title to "Alternative histories and speculative futures". Phunting (talk) 10:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Many of the works in this section are mnot alternative histories as when they were writen they were about evetns yet to happen not alternative versions of the past or presnet. I would therfore sugest that a new section is established called failed futures.[[Slatersteven (talk) 14:49, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I take your point, but I think a dedicated section would be overly specific to one rather obscure genre. I've changed the title to "Alternative histories and speculative futures". Phunting (talk) 10:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative histories
Talk:Zzyzx (film)

message: This reads to me like a press release: "dark, evocative, and twisty thriller" (twisty?) nothing worng with that as core for an entry but I suspect it needs a rewrite. Thoughts? (Emperor 17:10, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Press release?

message: Source is IMDB. There is no "Zzyzx" title in IMDB in any case. Michaelopolis (talk) 00:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Title of Film has been renamed "Burned
Talk:Tim Brewster

message: Does anybody want to add something on Brewster's recruiting classes so far?
:  That should wait until it's official. Gopher backer (talk) 01:42, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, it's official...17th class on Rivals.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.162.59.49 (talk) 00:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recruiting 

message: It was announced today that Brewster is going to be fired at the end of the year, but will coach the rest of the 2010 season (as of now).  Unless an official source can confirm that he is done right now, the article should say Brewster "is" coach, not "was". 
Miles Blues (talk · contribs) 02:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was / is coach
Talk:Indios de Mayagüez

message: ==Untitled==
History of the team can be improved, big time... please help! Demf 17:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewriting of the article as to accommodate the current (and silly) Indios Tiburones phase is needed. I won't do it, though... Demf (talk) 00:44, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Need help!

message: History of the team can be improved, big time... please help! Demf 17:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewriting of the article as to accommodate the current (and silly) Indios Tiburones phase is needed. I won't do it, though... Demf (talk) 00:44, 19 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Remember also that whenever you use the word "currently", you have to keep current. Apparently there aren't a host of followers clamoring to keep this page up to date. (In fact, I only found it because a Milwaukee Brewers' prospect was assigned to Criollos de Caguas and that page is way worse than this one: I came here to get some idea of what kind of league this is.)
I made one grammar edit and was going to make another but forgot where it was (and don't even remember if it was in English or Spanish). C'est la vie.
Sighthndman (talk) 14:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keeping up to date
Talk:King's Park, Hong Kong

message: Why is this the immediate redirect for King's Park when there are so many other places of this name - surely this should redirect to a disambiguation page?? --JamesTheNumberless 17:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is kings park in Jordan? 222.166.122.46 (talk) 01:36, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jordan and kings park
Talk:Judy Johnson

message: Birth/death dates and age don't match.  (The field for birth year doesn't match birth year in death date field...and text states 89 years at death.)
Social Security Death Index lists his birth date as "26 Dec 1899"--68.81.167.181 (talk) 23:08, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates/Age? 

message: The article says that Johnson became a scout for the Philadelphia Athletics in 1951 and lobbied for the team to sign prospect Larry Doby, among others.
By 1951, Doby was a two-time American League all-star who had finished in the top ten in MVP voting. I don't have the book that's being cited so perhaps there's more context here I'm not understanding, but unless there's additional context, it's either untrue or the easiest bit of scouting I've ever heard of.
In unrelated news, I hope my favorite team, the Cleveland Indians, signs this young prospect named Mike Trout. I think he might just be a good player someday.  Thejamootz (talk) 15:44, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the book on Google Books.  You're right, it made no mention of Doby; only Aaron & Minoso.  I'll fix it in a sec.  Rgrds. --Bison X (talk) 04:58, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time as a Scout
File talk:Plums.jpg

message: Could someone remove the protection, it was added in 2007 as a cascading protection from the main page and it is no longer needed. If not please recategorize it as :Category:Images of stone fruit --Jeremy (blah blah) 06:35, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Unprotected — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:02, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/TheListUpdater

message: User:TheListUpdater
      run at Tue Jan 16 17:19:23 2007 GMT
Category:	2
Image:	1
Mainspace	385
Talk:	39
User talk:	6
User:	14
Wikipedia:	10
avg edits per article	1.63
earliest	18:43, 27 December 2005
number of unique articles	280
total	457
2005/12 	1 	
2006/1 	2 	
2006/2 	0 	
2006/3 	21 	
2006/4 	24 	
2006/5 	62 	
2006/6 	68 	
2006/7 	51 	
2006/8 	19 	
2006/9 	15 	
2006/10 	15 	
2006/11 	42 	
2006/12 	77 	
2007/1 	60 	
TheListUpdater's editcount summary stats as of 17:19, January 16th 2007, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 17:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Singsaker Line

message: The currency was introduced when Norway joined the Scandinavian Monetary Union and had its direct equivalent in Danish kroner and Swedish kronor; Currencies with the designation "Krone" are also used in other countries. Traditionally, both Norwegian, Danish and Swedish kroner are abbreviated to "kr."; To distinguish Norwegian kroner from Danish and Swedish kroner, the abbreviation "nkr" is also traditionally used. The abbreviation NOK has only existed since the introduction of ISO 4217 in 1978. Mef.ellingen (talk) 22:15, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOK
Talk:Intelligent Giving

message: I moved this: Keystone - organization working on charities' accountability
from the article page because it does not yet have a Wikipedia article and the name directs to a disambiguation page (which is a "really bad thing" to do to readers).  If someone who know a bit about the org can start an article (assuming the org would meet Wikipedia's standards) we can link to it from the see also section.  -- Siobhan Hansa 17:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keystone 

message: I've tried to add some references.  Most are from IG's own website - which I don't think is a problem for the things they're used for, but feel free to disagree (and hopefully find better ones!).  Would be good to have more from other places though, especially on IG's actual process and impact rather than what they say is their process and impact.  Also more on the sector response would be good.  Their have been some great additions, the article really seems to be shaping up. -- Siobhan Hansa 18:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am a bit suspicious of the "good and bad responses from charities in equal measure": none of the good ones are listed here: are they somewhere? --BozMo talk 22:13, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They do exist - on the site's 'About Us' page, they quote a few charities who have reacted positively. Though whether this justifies saying that 'good and bad' responses were attracted in 'equal measure' is another thing entirely... Cameronweaver 08:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

text: For what its worth I have just sent them a positive reaction from the charity I work for as well. --BozMo talk 11:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: What's up with reference number 9? --John (talk) 23:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 
Template talk:Game guide

message: Is there a reason why this template links to Encyclopedia gamia and not GamerWiki? Tim 17:32, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Encyclopedia Gamia 

message: If the template is used without the date parameter, the category link shows up as plaintext. Ham Pastrami 01:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing date is not hidden
Talk:Kent Fire and Rescue Service

message: Please add any niteresting geographical info about the area covered by KFRS, and any pictures would be extremely welcome. For general comments about this article, please leave a message here rather than on my talk page. Regards Escaper7 17:33, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Geographical info

message: This article needs an info box once all the relevant data is gathered up, See LFB. Escaper27 13:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs Infobox
Talk:Amar Gupta

message: I am in the process of discussing the patents the professor, Dr. Amar Gupta holds, and discuss the technologies that use these patents. Additionally, I will create entries that discuss how these patents and technologies have been incorporated by the business community. The research conducted by this individual are not limited to past accomplishments, but include current work, that will be elaborated on.
::If it is true that this person has patents used by the business community, he would probably be considered notable by Wikipedia's editors.  Please clean up the article so it doesn't look like a resume, and cite plenty of neutral third-party sources that would establish this guy's notability. -Taco325i 17:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Speculation that anyone would 'probably' be considered notable by editors is not only inappropriate for lesser known academics and practitioners alike (not to mention inappropriate for a wiki committed to disbursing knowledge such as Wikipedia is), it is a blatant perpetuation of the Matthew Effect (not to mention ignorant, as not all academics or industry practitioners are afforded the luxury of being considered 'notable,' as anyone in any position of worth in academia would know). Nevertheless, your suggestions are being taken into consideration. In the interim, I invite all interested parties to visit Dr. Gupta's public website that has a listing of all neutral third-party publications his work has appeared in. -Yuu.david (talk) 03:23, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arthur Paul Pedrick

message: Clarified a few points in the article to make it clear that the applications were never followed through to become granted patents. 68.110.72.98 (talk) 00:22, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "The idea was to detect the difference in fur colour between Ginger and another cat, "Blackie" from next door. If Blackie attempted to use the cat-flap, he would not be allowed in. Ginger was impressed with the idea, and further suggested that the concept could be applied as a nuclear deterrent. Ginger's concern over the Cold War and the nuclear arsenals threatening the world was a regular motivator for Pedrick's inventions." 
What? His cat was concerned with Nuclear War? -75.111.17.178 (talk) 20:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, according to the patent application. GDallimore (Talk) 21:22, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Catflap patent

message: Anyone wanting to expand/cite this article might find these useful.  There's this in the World Patent Information journal, which I assume is a reliable source.  There's also this blog; whilst a blog is not normally reliable, per WP:BLOG it may be, in this case, as the author has been working and publishing in the field for a good while (and been used as an expert by the BBC).  Bromley86 (talk) 11:14, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Diaper Genie

message: Reading the instructions on a package isn't original research. Wikipedia:No original research is designed to screen out crank physics theories, not somebody taking a photograph of a Diaper Genie. --Eastmain 17:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not original research

message: Most of the newspaper articles that I saw at http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Diaper+Genie%22+site%3Awashingtonpost.com and at http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Diaper+Genie%22+site%3Anytimes.com mention Diaper Genie as if readers already knew what one is. This is a strong argument in favor of notability. --Eastmain 17:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Media coverage
Talk:List of Mensa Select recipients

message: Okay, I just grabbed Mensa Select and Mind Games (Mensa) as redirects. Does anyone have a preference as to which the main article should be? I'd like to expand the intro section about the selection process, etc. Oh, and it looks like the category Mind Games (Mensa) is being bumped to Mensa Select winners, accoridng to Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 January 16, section 1.8. samwaltz 14:16, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirects

message: Could someone keep their eye out for pages for the new winners? They aren't up yet, but I'm guessing a few will filter in over the next few weeks. They should be linked from this article and cat-tagged whenever Gemlok, Gheos, Hit or Miss (2007 game), Qwirkle, or Skullduggery (game)
turn blue. (I'm not sure what the full name of the Hit or Miss article will be, obviously).  Cheers, samwaltz 23:25, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates

message: I didn't want to just take it out in case I am wrong, but to me it feels like the second paragraph is unnecessary. Each of the places listed can be gleaned from the below list (except for the upcoming 2017 event) and are redundant. What do y'all think?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdvp7 (talk • contribs) 04:26, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second paragraph
Talk:Platform Equality and Remedies for Rights Holders in Music Act of 2007

message: Just so that this does not happen again, there is no article covering the the 2006 version of this bill.  This is not the place to cover the 2006 version, either.  If an article is created for the 2006 version of the bill, we could make Platform Equality and Remedies for Rights Holders in Music Act a disambiguation page for both. Mike Trausch (fd0man, Talk Page) 17:25, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is for 2007, not 2006. 

message: I have started this article, but I cannot do a great deal more of editing and the like on it, because I would very likely not be able to retain a NPOV on this.  Therefore, if you’re able to write more for this article, please do. Mike Trausch (fd0man, Talk Page) 17:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Article Development 

message: I am not so sure that I agree with the idea that DRM should be expressed as “digital rights management” with “protections” instead of “restrictions” on content.  I cannot think of a situation in which DRM has enhanced—or even neutrally affected—the area around it.  Then again, I am a user of GNU/Linux, and thus unable to use any DRM restricted content—at least, not legally. Mike Trausch (fd0man, Talk Page) 00:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DRM 

message: Why is 'Act' used in the name if it is not law? Isn't it a bill until then? Likewise, why include a year? --82.36.25.115 (talk) 17:50, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Act'? 