lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Worcestershire (UK Parliament constituency)

message: John Nanfan, elected MP in 1656, has his name linked to the article of the John Nanfan who was governor of New York Province from 1698, but that article gives no details of his life before 1688.  Without linking proof, the article ought to be delinked until citeable proof can be found.Cloptonson (talk) 20:58, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct John Nanfan?

message: I can't find in Nash, the source given for the early MPs, a list, or anything confiriming Walter Beauchamp's inclusino in the list. I was trying to create an article on him, but there is a possibility he is one of those listed at Walter Beauchamp disambiguation page. Can anyone help? Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 09:48, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering if it might be Walter de Beauchamp (d. 1328), listed as the eldest son of Walter de Beauchamp (Steward to Edward I). It makes sense chronologically—12 Edward II was 1318—but I couldn't find anything to confirm it. —ShelfSkewed Talk 07:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Walter Beauchamp
Talk:Wrexham (UK Parliament constituency)

message: it said here that in 1983 Tom Ellis moved to fight Clwyd South in 1983, but that seat did not exist until the 1997 general election. In fact, he stood for Clwyd South West, which indeed is what the cited source states. Although similar the old Clwyd South West seat was not identical to the later Clwyd South. I have therefore amended this in the text. Dunarc (talk) 20:58, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tom Ellis in 1983 

message: What outside sources is there to confirm that an Irish political party ran in Wrexham ? that be the equivalent of SNP having a candidate running in an English constituency. Japhes5005 (talk) 20:58, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent Nationalist
Talk:John Sharp (Texas politician)

message: Wow, can someone please edit this for a neutral POV? Sounds like a campaign website.
--
Indeed and initiatives are not headlines, which is all we have. Perhaps it reflects how little Sharp knows about higher ed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2C6:4300:B8C0:5CCF:7E15:FA97:6591 (talk) 01:46, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:York Central (UK Parliament constituency)

message: There are problems with the statement  that the seat is 'currently the only constituency in North Yorkshire not represented by Conservatives'. This depends on how North Yorkshire is defined. The ceremonial county - which the page links to includes seats like Middlesbrough South and East Cleveland and Redcar which are Labour held.
Dunarc (talk) 19:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Does this require updating following Keir Mather's win after the 2023 Selby and Ainsty by-election? Therefore, one in three constituencies? RyanPLB (talk) 19:35, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   'Only constituency in North Yorkshire not represented by Conservatives'
Talk:Saskatoon City (provincial electoral district)

message: Looking at the voting numbers it's clear "Saskatoon City" encompassed more than the city of Saskatoon - 213,000 votes in 1964 was about double the city's population at the time. Presumably the riding must have included substantial rural areas too, correct? 70.72.223.215 (talk) 18:59, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Perhaps a map of the district should be added
Talk:Avispa

message: I've removed the speedy delete request because the article doesn't really need a substantial re-write. It could use some expansion, but not a complete rewrite. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 05:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedy delete request 
Talk:Amy's Kitchen

message: It should be noted--unless things have changed very recently--that Amy's "Gluten-Free" products come with the warning:  "Manufactured on equipment that processes wheat", meaning those with severe wheat/gluten allergies/intolerances have a high risk of an attack from cross contamination. 69.246.217.44 (talk) 01:43, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this perhaps a regional thing? I don't have any of their food in my freezer at the moment, but I swear I've eaten one of their pizzas before, and I always check for the "Manufactured on equipment that processes wheat" since the cross contamination would make me sick, too.      Sophus Bie (talk) 05:37, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Dunno.  My region is midwest, but I've seen on Celiac forums where others were outraged at the marketing of their products as "gluten free", and labelled as manufactured on contaminated machines.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.246.217.44 (talk) 02:33, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Gluten-Free" 
Talk:Pelly-Nisutlin

message: The swing for the candidate re-elected in 2021 is positive, not negative. I don't know how to fix that, nor how to add date to the table, as I can't find where to edit it. Ds77 (talk) 11:56, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for bringing this up. The swing was calculated incorrectly too, so I've fixed this. The results were moved to a template, making it difficult for the casual editor to update.-- Earl Andrew - talk 12:50, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swing is incorrect
Talk:Clearwater Lake (British Columbia)

message: I see that User:Wgair changed the depth of Clearwater Lake (British Columbia) to be 600m in April 2015. I can't find a source for this. Very few lakes worldwide are that deep. In the meantime, I'm going to revert the article to use the previous depth figure, which (though also unreferenced) is more plausible. Rupert Clayton (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: 600 feet is much more likely. The Interior (Talk) 02:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depth 
Talk:Hookah lounge

message: I flagged the history section for not citing sources, especially since it is making value judgments about the quality of hookahs, styles which are typical, etc. These are claims which need citations. Zminer (talk) 01:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the state-by-state age restrictions is very likely incorrect now that about a quarter of the states passed new tobacco laws. I am having trouble finding the laws for my own state, let alone 12 others. Psu256 (talk) 15:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

message: Of the 5 hookah bars I've been to, none of them have given more than 1 mouth piece (unless we ask for more). So how valid is this statement? How many do the hookah bars you've been to give initially?
Mofuggin bob (talk) 02:36, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: One mouthpiece per person. 24.240.38.84 (talk) 08:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Typically a disposable mouthpiece is provided for each user..." 

message: Somebody proposed merging these two articles with tags, but no discussion was opened.  I would support the merge - there's no reason for separating content between the two articles.  PKT(alk) 01:28, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Hookah Lounge Exemptions and Restrictions]] into [[Hookah lounge]] 

message: This article has so many weasel words and subjective opinions in it. Please help clean it up. --Have a great day , Sanjev Rajaram (talk) 03:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Article is a mess 

message: Age to purchase and consume tobacco products is now 21+ across the entire United States. I am not aware of any exceptions for hookah products. 153.104.35.255 (talk) 14:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  exceptions to smoking age are outdated 

message: There appears to be a great deal of overlap between this article and the Hookah article. Much of what appears here seems to belong there instead. Quite arguably, the entire content of this article should be moved into that one, with any duplicate coverage eliminated. And then this article should be deleted. Toddcs (talk) 20:40, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why two articles?
Talk:Distinguished Intelligence Medal

message: Is it known when the award was instituted? (Or is that a secret? ;p )  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  10:43, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The envelope, please
Talk:Madras Engineer Group

message: Here are some random research sources that may be helpful for developing this article
* A short history of Queen Victorias Own Madras Sappers & Miners during World War II, 1939-1945: Compiled from war diaries and unit histories completed up to December 1947 
by R. A Lindsell.
* http://www.bbc.co.uk/ww2peopleswar/stories/63/a2865963.shtml
* http://www.indianpost.com/viewstamp.php/Alpha/U/UNIFORMS%20OF%201780%20AND%201980%20CREST%20&%20RIBBON?PHPSESSID=68c607acf3a17a22c68eb31e72459bff
* http://www.collectorsprints.com/art/2700.asp
* http://indiapicks.com/stamps/Forces/960_Madras_Sappers.htm
* http://www.collectbritain.co.uk/personalisation/object.cfm?uid=019PHO000000487U00064000
* http://www.newman-family-tree.net/Battle-of-Tofrik.pdf
* http://www.princelystates.com/ArchivedFeatures/fa-01-02b.shtml
This may also help the editor who placed a speedy delete flag decide on notability. Shyamal (talk) 05:50, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Research sources

message: The article British Cemetery in Malakand, North West Frontier Province of Pakistan, mentions a grave erected by Madras Sappers -- (Ekabhishek (talk) 11:13, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Early 20th century grave of a [[Madras Sappers]]
Talk:Torpedo system

message: It only took me about five minutes' searching on Google to find two additional examples of the use of this phrase in reporting on hockey matches. I've added those to the "external links" section, and for this reason I'm removing the prod tag. --Tkynerd (talk) 05:51, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, shouldn't be deleted at all. The term was ablaze during the 2002 Winter Olympics Sweden vs. Canada, where the torpedo passes of Lidstrom and company threw off the Canadian team (see Sports Illustrated for example) Natural hat trick (talk) 06:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the biggest issue is that this isn't usually what is called a torpedo pass. What is usually known as a torpedo pass is a short fast pass, which is why its called a torpedo pass. Its a lightning fast pass like a torpedo. But for the sake of arguement assuming it is correct, you obviously didn't read the link I put in as well. Avoid articles on Neologisms. Here I will quote "The first is that Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and so articles simply attempting to define a neologism are inappropriate." -Djsasso (talk) 15:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If there's something that is "usually...called a torpedo pass," then the term isn't a neologism ("usually called" implies a reasonably well-established usage), and you should document your assertion as to what a torpedo pass really is and revise the article accordingly. --Tkynerd (talk) 16:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: "Neologisms are words and terms that have recently been coined, generally do not appear in any dictionary, but may be used widely or within certain communities" Either way it still a Neologism whichever meaning it has. In order to source it you would need articles ABOUT the term, not just using the term as is mentioned on that page. -Djsasso (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but all you have is a bare assertion that this is a neologism. You need to document that fact. --Tkynerd (talk) 16:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually burden on proof is on the article creator to prove that it is not one. -Djsasso (talk) 17:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the burden of proof is on the person proposing deletion. --Tkynerd (talk) 17:01, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, all things must be referenced. His is currently unreferenced in terms of needing an article about the term not using the term. " To support the use of (or an article about) a particular term we must cite reliable secondary sources such as books and papers about the term—not books and papers that use the term" to quote the standard. -Djsasso (talk) 17:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "One writer's invention"?
Talk:Kid Cuisine

message: As it stands now, this article shows BLATANT bias in favor of Stouffer's and even BIRDS EYE. Compare the Stouffer's article for a second and you'll see that the quality of information is just incomparable. The Birds Eye page reads more like an official obituary for some third world tyrant. " founders of the modern frozen food industry"??? Give me a break.
I think Kid Cuisine should be expanded into a category, in my opinion this will provide the easiest way to organize individual pages based on characters, dinners, trivia facts, quotations, etc. WIKIPEDIANS: FIX THIS. - KCpeng  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.64.150.97 (talk) 03:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

message: Apparantly the mascot is now three penguins, and kid cuisine is "cusine made by pengweens". I'd change it but I don't have time. Someone should fix this. Wildgoosespeeder 00:27, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: New mascot

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGbhJjXl9Rk
Link #3
What is?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:CDC9:3D00:5458:3551:F701:B968 (talk) 05:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird link 
Talk:576th Flight Test Squadron

message: There is no citation in the Aircraft and missiles section. Otherwise, this is B class. Djmaschek (talk) 04:03, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: B class review
Talk:Billy Olson

message: I’m a friend of bill Richards and I build monuments. I would like to make one for you. If you would like to contact me my number is 254-214-5955 there will be no charge for this. 166.196.61.70 (talk) 01:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monument
Talk:List of former English Football League clubs

message: Is there a similar page for former Scottish league clubs? If not I will create one. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 20:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scotland 

message: Surely the new Halifax club are new so the old club should be listed as defunct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.197.168 (talk) 07:14, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: There is no clear definition as to what constitutes a new or old club on this page nor on the companion page of current teams.  Woolwich Arsenal became "The Arsenal" when the club moved from Kent to north London in 1913, and effectively found a new support in its new home, as Wimbledon did on becoming MK Dons.   The "Woolwich Arsenal" page has this on it...
---
Woolwich Arsenal
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to:navigation, search
This may refer to:
    * Arsenal F.C. - the Football Club in North London.
----
which isn't quite right since a search for Woolwich Arsenal will probably refer to Woolwich Arsenal FC which played in the league until 1913.
Woolwich Arsenal does have its own blog (www.blog.woolwicharsenal.co.uk) although here I must acknowledge bias since I edit it.
Tony Attwood  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tonyattwood (talk • contribs) 13:51, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Woolwich Arsenal 
Talk:O'Connell (name)

message: I have no knowledge about the legitimacy of this claim, however that is not my main problem with the edit. The first problem is the wording. "The O'Connells claim..." is wrong,  the the source doesn't speak for all O'Connells, it can only speak for itself. Which brings me to my second problem, I doubt surnamedb.com can be considered a reliable source according to Wikipedia policy, since it doesn't list the sources for its claims and it is not peer-reviewed. --Saddhiyama (talk) 10:26, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 203.217.169.248, keep the personal attacks up and you'll be the one who's blocked. Saddhiyama, surnamedb looks to be run by subject matter experts. Should we ask at WP:RSN to get more opinions? --NeilN talk to me 16:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: By all means. I would very much like a 3rd opinion on this. Thanks. --Saddhiyama (talk) 01:17, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  7th century descent
Talk:Ctenosaura pectinata

message: Wow, this article made it to the main page today, yet it doesn't have a single photo?  What the...?  You'd think with 12,000 of the little buggers in Florida alone, someone could find at least one to grab a picture of.  --Brownings (talk) 22:31, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo?

message: Given the long history of numerous common names, in some cases the same common names, having been applied to three different species of Ctenosaura, and a history of taxonomic confusion among the species, I would suggest the name of this page be changed back or redirected  to the Latin name  Ctenosaura pectinata. --WiLaFa (talk) 01:47, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name: ''Ctenosaura pectinata'', western spiny-tailed iguana, or Mexican spinytailed iguana? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 18:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Mexican spiny-tailed iguana →  – The recent move on 6 July 2021 was not necessary and is potentially confusing with other species. The name Mexican spiny-tailed iguana is not the currently accepted standardized name. Using the common name for this page is inconsistent with all other 14 species in the genus on Wikipedia. The common names  Mexican spiny-tailed iguana and black spiny-tailed iguana are informally used for many species of Ctenosaura WiLaFa (talk) 17:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 July 2021 

message: in description, weights in both english (lbs), and metric (kgs) needs to be added. Gizziiusa (talk) 01:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  birth weight, and typical adult weights of average male and female ?!
Talk:Multilingual notation

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 06:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-12-31 Automated pywikipediabot message 
Talk:Sprouted bread

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 06:25, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-12-31 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: This article reads like an infomercial for sprouted bread. Maybe that's a little harsh but the text's main point seems to be to extol the virtues of sprouted bread. While there is a "Benefits" section, much of the section before it ("Sprouted Grain Bread"...what value this section title adds given that this is the topic of the article itself, I can't imagine) consists mainly of describing its benefits also. I really don't know if the benefits of sprouted bread are in any way controversial, however there are no supporting references to any science, and even if not controversial, the information could be presented in rather more objective fashion.
Also, their ought not be a "we" used here, as in the final paragraph of the "Essene Bread" section. Perhaps it ought to be reworded as "most contemporary westerners" or some such.
Some references to studies of wheat or gluten sensitive individuals being able to eat sprouted bread would be nice. I've heard plenty of anecdotal evidence to this fact but such a claim ought to be supported or described as anecdotal. --Ericjs (talk) 13:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A new section is fine in principle, but there's not much content at present. Why do you want to remove it? It mentions the differences with refined grains, which is hardly 'especially like an advert'. Greenman (talk) 15:02, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article quality 

message: The first paragraph says sprouted bread is made from grain that sprouts before it is milled into flour. The image caption says "flourless". There seem to be two different meanings of "flour".
oldrider (talk) 17:35, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  First paragraph contradicts image caption
Talk:Brigade Speciale Beveiligingsopdrachten

message: Main problem with the text was the often literal translation of words and sentences (in that order) from Dutch into English, resulting in very strange sentence constructions. In some cases these strange constructions resulted in such strange texts that they could not be properly translated back into Dutch. In those cases I could only copy the meaning of the story. As a result, there may be minor errors in the text that are unknown to me as an uninitiated.  
Regards,
RonaldV-tm (talk) 21:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text cleaned up in the *Task* part of the article
Talk:Ionic conductivity (solid state)

message: Ionic conductivity in the article name, and ionic conduction in intro, is a problem. Gene Nygaard (talk) 06:34, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's exactly what I thought. Ubcule (talk) 08:23, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

text: The ionic conductivity units are wrong 137.132.119.3 (talk) 06:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

text: And references to "Figure 1", but no actual figure 1. Ubcule (talk) 08:23, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:RAF Bottisham

message: The coordinates need the following fixes: Bottisham Airfield. Now Cambridge Airport - coordinates are incorrect as shown in Wikipedia article on Bottisham vs coordinates on Google Earth.
* Write here
The coordinates need the following fixes: Bottisham Airfield. Now Cambridge Airport - coordinates are incorrect as shown in Wikipedia article on Bottisham vs coordinates on Google Earth.
216.26.88.80 (talk) 18:30, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error
Talk:Jack Elkes

message: There is a photograph of the Newport United team for 1905-06 on www.discovershropshire.org.uk showing a Jack Elkes. As the subject of this article would have been aged 10-11 at the time, this is presumably someone else, although the player in the photo does look very like the only photo I can find of Elkes!   --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ayub Quadri

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Ayub Quadri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110723082449/http://nation.ittefaq.com/artman/exec/view.cgi/61/33380 to http://nation.ittefaq.com/artman/exec/view.cgi/61/33380
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
 Link rot had already set in before url was archived. Worldbruce (talk) 13:59, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Linn Markley Farish

message: I woul just to point out that, unless there is more evidence that is not mentioned in the article, the quoted venoma message does not say Farish was Attila, it says: presumably Lin Markley Farish, senior US Liaison officer at Tito's HQ... and it does so in the comments section, not in any part of the message. Unless there is further evindence this is merely a guess, not evidence.--Rowanwindwhistler (talk) 10:04, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The document says "presumably", so care should be taken when stating things as facts
Talk:Hurricane Creek mine disaster

message: Tom T. Hall wrote a song about this called 'Trip To Hyden', should that be included? Farmercarlos (talk) 12:50, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to add it myself. Farmercarlos (talk) 12:58, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musical Reaction
Talk:Young Australian Democrats

message: I question the notability of this. It's clearly not worth a separate article at a time when the parent party is (at the very least) moribund. Moreover, the YADs' website carries Latest News which is undated and not news at all-- and the group's general discussion forum has had only one post since October 2008. Not what one could call world-shattering, eh? Cheers Bjenks (talk) 10:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable?