Talk:Lex orandi, lex credendi

message: It is my motion that this article be removed from the WikiProject Catholicism.  While it may be somewhat important to note that this is one way in which Anglicans differ from Catholics, it is definitely an Anglican-only doctrine (non-Catholic).  --TheTriumvir 00:45, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Membership in Catholicism Project 

message: Do we really need two pages, when all you have to say about the ancient principle is summed up in a sentence? Fishhead64 21:41, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The merge looks like a good thing.  I would love to see editors with some knowledge of the ancient ecumenical councils, and of Catholic and Orthodox Churches, contribute some to this. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 20:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Discussion 

message: According to Bishop Ware, this is also a belief in the Eastern Orthodox church.  See his quote in Ordination of women#Eastern Orthodox for more details. -- Cat Whisperer 23:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastern Orthodox 

message: Benandorsqueaks added a cite references tag for the Anglicanism section.  Suffice to say, the references are summed up by the works cited in the bibliography.  fishhead64 (talk) 02:02, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Anglicanism references

message: The article should maybe give mention to the related phrase Ars celebrandi, and if it can't, a good stub article would be appreciated. ADM (talk) 21:02, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ars celebrandi

message: Perhaps some mention could be made of who first coined the phrase, legem credendi lex statuat supplicandi? Rwflammang (talk) 18:54, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution

message: But these edits strike me as extremely tendentious, as well as unlikely on their face:.
Certainly the statements about Roman Catholic doctrine are false, not to mention off topic.
Since these edits, and indeed the whole anglican section, are devoid of references, I purpose to delete them.
Rwflammang (talk) 23:24, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The Anglican section is still off topic. It has been marked as problematic. I propose to delete most of it. Rick Jelliffe (talk) 03:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm no anglican 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Lex orandi, lex credendi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071014002913/http://www.vatican.va:80/archive/catechism/p2s1c1a2.htm to http://www.vatican.va/archive/catechism/p2s1c1a2.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lex orandi, lex credendi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070705220154/http://www.ecupatriarchate.org/press/articles.php?id=94 to http://www.ecupatriarchate.org/press/articles.php?id=94
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified