lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gloria Hatrick McLean

message: On 28 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Gloria Hatrick McLean.
This page was voted on for deletion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Gloria Hatrick McLean. The final result was Merge and redirect with James Stewart. Note: this has already been done. --Deathphoenix 01:47, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: Why isn't the article titled by her married name of Stewart. She's certainly much better known as Gloria Stewart than Gloria McLean. 76.202.192.102 (talk) 02:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  name
Talk:Public and private bills

message: Should we mention the Schiavo private bill that just passed Congress? john k 18:01, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would completely agree that the article Private bills is wholly unnecessary and should be merged with this one. -- Mmccalpin 05:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what previous discussion this references, but I fully agree. This somehow was never done. I'm just going to go ahead and merge. \langle Forbes72 | Talk \rangle 19:47, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging with Private bills

message: From what I understand, private acts are still quite commonplace in the legislatures of many of the states.  They certainly are here in Tennessee, where they are required for things such as amending the charter of non-home rule cities, meaning that they must be passed to do things such as give many small-town mayors a raise or change the length of terms of city counsellors.  Additionally, similar bills are often passed with wording like "this article shall only be operative in cities with a population of 680,000 or greater in the 2000 federal census, or any subsequent census" (meaning in this example, only Memphis, or, for a truly ludicrous example, "'Restaurant' also means a facility located in any municipality haiving a population in excess of one hundred thousand (100,000) accoring to the 1990 federal census, or any subsequent census, in which coffees, teas, pastries, and other foodstuffs are offered for sale for consumption on the premises, which facility has a seating capacity of at least thirty (30) seats and which facility obatins at least fifty percent (50%) of its annual gross revenues from the sale of coffees, teas, and pastries..." {Tennessee Code Annotated, 57-4-102(27)(F)), which is a provision of a "public act" which essentially allows one particular pastry shop to apply for a liquor license.  Are such things common in most states, or is Tennessee a particularly bad example?  Rlquall 15:14, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  States (U.S.)
Talk:Kremvax

message: This article is based on material taken from the Free On-line Dictionary of Computing prior to 1 November 2008 and incorporated under the "relicensing" terms of the GFDL, version 1.3 or later.
(This disclaimer moved here from article mainspace by Tpdwkouaa (talk) 00:52, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  FOLDOC Content 

message: The content the edit warring is going on over is in my opinion POV and needs to either be removed or significantly reworked. Everyking 01:23, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Months have passed since Willard's perfectly reasonable request, and no reference is forthcoming.  I've removed the particularly POV sentence at the end - it's typical Eric S. Raymond ranting; such fact-free POV doesn't belong here. -- Middenface 00:35, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I fixed a couple more howling POV problems with the remaining part of the last paragraph, but I'm still very unhappy about it.  We wouldn't, surely, let some other random website's article claim it had such an important part in history without a molecule of evidence , so I don't know why we let this one either.  Barring sources cited, I think the whole last paragraph should be removed as unverified and questionable. -- Middenface 00:46, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: I'm not sure the redirect from Vadim Antonov to this page is reasonable.
Kevink707 (talk) 20:47, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vadim Antonov 

message: The 'Spafford Spoof', a helpful howto message titled Subject: Warning: April Fools Time again (forged messages on loose), was posted to usenet. It purported to be from Gene Spafford but was apparently spoofed by Chuq Von Rospach; the return path included moscvax. 
wayback archive
canonical url 35111-F  (alt link) Ahazred8 (talk) 02:09, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  April Fools post 1988
Talk:United Nations Commission on International Trade Law

message: Dear Wikipedia colleagues! I wrote here an article about the head of UNCITRAL, the French lawyer Anna Joubin-Bret. I would be very happy if someone could supplement information here! Many thanks in advance! Yours sincerely Fritzober (talk) 20:29, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anna Joubin-Bret
Talk:Agent X (Marvel Comics)

message: Agent X (comics) → Agent X
*--DrBat 02:38, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move request (old)

message: It should be noted that the reason Cable and Deadpool changed title names was because the creator of the two (Rob Liefield)was still getting paid royalties and Marvel decided to change the names of the two to avoid paying him still. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 153.2.246.33 (talk • contribs) .
:Actually, he wasn't - none of the titles were selling enough for him to get royalties. It was (an attempt at) a sales-grab, pure and simple - SoM 13:13, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Royalties

message: The article says almost nothing about the actual character of Agent X. I notice that it mentions in passing that his name is Nijo, and his powers are listed in the superhero box. That's IT. I know there's more to this guy than that, or there wouldn't be a comic book about him. The Agent X series isn't the only thing with "ambiguous hints". Info, please...
Noclevername 09:25, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Who Is Agent X?

message: As Marvel has another Agent X (comics), Agent X (Jim Burley) this should really be at Agent X (Nijo Minamiyori). I won't move it yet though. (Emperor (talk) 02:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Soluna

message: soluna is a great group im sure they will always be together
----
I have cleaned up the article a bit, but it still is sort of hagiographic. Perhaps there should be something about how Soluna has declined from their popularity which they once had when releasing For All Time. - Stoph 02:49, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Christopher Mayhew

message: How can this be set up so it links automatically to the articles for Christopher Paget Mayhew and Baron Mayhew of Wimbledon?
:By way of redirects. Christopher Paget Mayhew already redirects here. Baron Mayhew of Wimbledon doesn't, but has no incoming links. Baron Mayhew I'll do now. --kingboyk 18:57, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: I've added a reference to The Shamen recording which I hope you don't consider out of place in the article. However, following the link provided to the transcript I don't see the words as spoken by Mayhew in the song. Did they perhaps sample a subsequent interview? --kingboyk 23:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Excuse me, I'm an idiot. He clearly refers to the trip in the past tense in one section, but in another he's being asked the date. A mish mash. --kingboyk 01:54, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Shamen 

message: The statement in the article that Mayhew traveled to Russia with Philby, Burgess, Blunt, and Maclean seems to me very improbable. I don't have access to Mayhew's memoirs and so can't categorically deny that he makes the claim, but I can find no corroboration elsewhere. I believe Mayhew did travel to Russia as part of a group with which Blunt was also affiliated, but so far as I know Mayhew encountered Burgess for the first time years later and promptly sacked him from the Foreign Office for misbehavior. If no one can provide other evidence to back up the assertion, I'll remove it. -- Zhuravlei (talk) 22:11, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cambridge Five claim 

message: I can't understand why I am having difficulty having this article accepted Draft:Middle East International Padres Hana (talk) 16:46, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle East International
Talk:Exploding head syndrome

message: ? worth a section of the syndrome in culture following the movie "memoria" by apichatpong weerasethakul, if there are other cases to go with this one  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.159.211.31 (talk) 13:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: A possible source Quilt Phase (talk) 09:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  in culture 

message: "The cause of the phenomenon is psychological in nature".
If the cause is unknown, how is this statement factual? Am I missing something? 
For many diseases, stress is a compounding factor, but in this case, without solid evidence, I suggest we remove this hypothesis. Enigma55 (talk) 02:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Enigma55, just saw that sentence myself and removed it. Schazjmd (talk) 00:33, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychological in nature 

message: I just deleted the section referencing conspiratorial "energy weapons" as a possible cause of EHS. Source [2] places the first recorded case of EHS to the 19th century, so this entire conspiracy speculation is not only distracting, but potentially harmful. BlueToriel (talk) 13:52, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  We have to drop the conspiratorial section 

message: The treatment section currently says that reassurance and education can reduce frequency of episodes, citing [4], but from what I can tell, the only statement relating to reassurance as treatment is "To date, there have been no clinical trials for EHS treatment. In the majority of cases, firm reassurance about the benign nature of EHS seems appropriate and drug therapy is not necessary." Which to me sounds like they are just saying to reassure patients so they aren't worried somethings wrong, not that it actually reduces the frequency of episodes. TheSandyCanes (talk) 11:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reassurance as treatment
Talk:Non-Partisan Association

message: Do you think Vancouver or Canada in general is moving towards a NPA position or COPE position? Is Canada moving toward right wing or left wing?
With the election of Sam Sullivan, the BC Conservative Party will be making a comeback soon--RyanWarawa 06:11, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section currently reads as promotional script, and less a historical recollection of the party on a whole. No citations nor explanation of early formation. Requesting this section be expanded upon and wording brought up to neutral point of view.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by An otter (talk • contribs) 18:25, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early Years Section 

message: asked:  in this edit.
That kind of thing is covered under WP:COI. But since there's already a warning at the top of the page about possible COI (from years ago), there's not much we can do other than report individual users if they repeatedly edit in a way that does not respect WP:NPOV. —Joeyconnick (talk) 19:27, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  recent query re: conflict of interest
Talk:Red Bull Theatre

message: "Less is known of the Red Bull's provenance than of other contemporary venues ..." Huh? This is certainly a misuse of the word provenance ("the chronology of the ownership, custody or location of a historical object"); but I don't know what the intended sense was. Does it just mean the early history?  GrindtXX (talk) 19:03, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Provenance" 

message: A list of productions from the Red Bull Theater, New York City, "for a contemporary New York audience" doesn't seem to comply with WP:TOPIC. Suggest deleting this, but it could be a standalone article, of course.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 11:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No disagreement?  —  done.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 15:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Too soon! It's been restored, but without any comment here. May I reiterate? It's in pursuance of WP:TOPIC.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 15:53, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The first sentence of the section – the fact that the Red Bull Theater of New York exists, and takes its name from the London theatre – is very much on topic, and should be retained (with a reference to its website; if we had a reference that explicitly stated the connection, that would be even better). Similar "Legacy" sections exist all over Wikipedia. The list of productions, however, is too much detail and too peripheral to the topic of this article, and should be deleted. I assumed from your original comment that that was what you had in mind. GrindtXX (talk) 19:04, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry my post, above, isn't plain. To summarise: the theater itself is on topic but the list of productions isn't. Thanks for clarifying this. The suggestion that the NY establishment is named after the London inn-yard theatre doesn't seem to have any reference that I could find.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 20:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

text:  fixed—didn't look hard enough.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 20:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Legacy"
Talk:Sharp NEC Display Solutions

message: "It became a wholly-owned subsidiary of NEC Corporation on March 31, 2005."
The sentance is written in past tense, yet the date, March 31, 2005 is in the future. Is there an error here? Reub2000 04:58, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See ; looks like someone was just trying to save themselves the trouble of having to update the page in the future :) -- Bloodshedder 05:02, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense. So I'm going to chage it for the next 10 days. Reub2000 06:33, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, sorry about the confusion. Christopher Mahan 18:51, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: No kidding.  I've changed it to an edit of the previous version with the factual bits from the advertisement added in. -- Haridan 20:47, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2005-03-14/Page moves

message: As a tool to combat this, would it be possible for someone to code in a user-revert tool? Something the administrators could use to combat user accounts from doing things like this. As far as I can figure out, all it would need to do is
#Iterate through every change a user has made (or within a certain time period)
#If it was the last change on a page, revert to previous version
This would fail if the user used multiple accounts to change one page multiple times, but should be a fairly easy stopgap measure.
Eric Burnett 05:34, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Administrators have access to a rollback tool they can use while viewing an editor's contribution history. However, when a page is moved to a new location (as opposed to just edited) the process of reverting the change is more complicated. That's the problem involved here. --Michael Snow 06:43, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: Yes, that's part of what the developers are working on - page move rollbacks, as it were. --Michael Snow 07:40, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Solutions 

message: New users can't even move Kirche, Kuche, Kinder to Kinder, Kirche, Kuche. Can we please get this "feature" deactivated? Yubyub 22:54, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: This is a travesty
Talk:Six Thinking Hats/Archive 1

message: What is the full, proper reference for this book?--SmokeyJoe 04:09, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: I say we merge them.Combine the best of both. 
I merged them. Let's delete this one. Syphron12 23:11, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Het Loo Palace

message: Het Loo has been designated a "palace" at wikipedia! --Wetman 06:53, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm working on the article bicycle for an audio file, and was wondering, How do you say "Paleis het Loo" (pronunciation.)  Can anyone add that to an audio file.  --CylePat 01:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Audio

message: From the article:
:Outside the garden there are a few straight scenic avenues, for following the hunt in a carriage
What hunt. Fox hunt? Clarify. Jake b 22:30, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Deer hunt. The estate is well known for its wildlife, especially deer. The gardens belong to the :nl:Kroondomein Het Loo. (Sorry, no English version available.) The Banner talk 09:56, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: The Hunt
Talk:Wartburg (disambiguation)

message: ug....i uploaded a nice picture I took of a Wartburg and for some reason it says "missing image" everytime I try and embed it. This didn't happen with my other entries...anu ideas? The name of the file is "Warti4.jpg"
TruthCrusader 07:04, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Checking your contributions list, you named the file 'Warti4.JPG'. Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 11:31, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Queen's University

message: When I first looked at the page Queen's University today, it was a disambiguation page. On examining Whatlinkshere/Queen's University, I found about 45 articles of which only 6 referred to the Belfast establishment. I have adjusted those 6 articles and moved the disambig page.
The situation now is:
*Queen's University (disambiguation) exists with appropriate links
*Queen's University redirects to Queen's University, Canada
Note that Queen's University, Belfast tends to speak of itself using all three words or abbreviated as QUB. So the incidence of new edits causing false links is likely to be small.
-- RHaworth 08:14, 2005 Mar 16 (UTC)
Given that there are two Queen's Universities, should we not move Queen's University, Canada to "Queen's University at Kingston", since that is what the Canadian one calls itself? Ground Zero 13:10, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If Queen's University is just a redirect it is better to simply move Queen's University, Canada to Queen's University and dispense with the disambiguation altogether. - SimonP 19:41, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
Please do not direct this to Queen's University Canada. (Belfast is more known internationally, at least in Asia) Icecafe (talk) 22:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Queen's School of Computing. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  feminist (talk) 07:52, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Queen's School of Computing" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Queen's University current events. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  feminist (talk) 07:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Queen's University current events" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Queen's University Current Events. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  feminist (talk) 07:53, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Queen's University Current Events" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sergey Ilyushin

message: filling gaps in this article i've translated some text from http://testpilot.ru/russia/ilushin/il.htm
--jno 08:02, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: I removed from the lead section of this article the sentence:
:His son, Vladimir Ilyushin, and not Yuri Gagarin, is said to have been the first human in space.
This allegation has in fact been made, but is almost certainly not true. Even if it is worthy of mention in this article, it doesn't warrant inclusion in the lead section. (sdsds - talk) 02:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vladimir Ilyushin 

message: In See also section of the article I see info on the son Vladimir Sergeyevich Ilyushin; if that is true I propse adding that info to children entry of the infobox. I am currently out of practice editing infoboxes and involved in something else, so if somebody else finds time to do it before I can (s)he is welcome. --Marjan Tomki SI (talk) 13:53, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding reference to the son to the infofield
Talk:Melanie Phillips

message: It is wrong to have her views on Irish independence listed as a ‘domestic issue’. Irish independence and national sovereignty is no more a British ‘domestic issue’ than US, Italian, or Japanese sovereignty. 2A02:C7E:3338:BC00:9892:562:49BD:C9E6 (talk) 14:09, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish independence as a ‘domestic issue’
Talk:Timeline of Middle Eastern history

message: I took main-data from the millennia at centuries and transposed later the structure from History of the Middle East. Please help bringing the timeline in a good shape and add events (especially non-ancient) from either a) centuries, where you can look at the centuries (instead of millennia) what gives more detail, or b) (best) History of the Middle East or any other histories of a country in the region. Ben (talk) 17:28, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)
this has been lying idle for two years. I suggest it should be split:
*Timeline of the Ancient Near East
*Timeline of the Persian Empire
*Timeline of Classical Antiquity
*Timeline of the Ottoman Empire
*Timeline of Middle Eastern history (1922-present)
dab (𒁳) 14:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As this hasn't been done I've removed the split tag. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 18:51, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  first very rough sketch 

message: The article gives two contradicting dates for the invention of wheel in Mesopotamia: once in the 6th millenium BCE and once in the 3rd millenium. --Vasiliy Faronov (talk) 11:24, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invention of wheel 

message: Why?  Or have I got something wrong?
180.183.96.32 (talk) 06:58, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added it to the list!--Watisfictie (talk) 10:57, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gobeli Tepe omitted 

message: I am suggesting that we (or I) will change the BC (before Christ, which is a religious term) and AD (Anno Domini, which is a religious term) to BCE (before common era) and CE (common era). The main reason for it is that we shall have religious-free terms. Lironos / 2LIRONOS7 / Lyronos (talk) 00:06, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I just came across this article and thought of the same thing, would it be okay if I (or anyone else) does this? Religious terms have a theology charge that could very easily be avoided. 181.12.40.73 (talk) 01:39, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  AD to CE 

message: What do the terms Early / Middle / Late Islamic period mean? How are they defined? When do they start and end? They show up in articles about Jordan for instance, but I cannot find a periodisation offering the basic meaning.
I will post this also on other relevant pages. The discussion should be held at Talk:Timeline of Islamic history (so not here). Thanks. Arminden (talk) 15:04, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of Early / Middle / Late Islamic period