Talk:Olaf Bull

message: :*As as to point of view tag—things written about a poet are point of view—you'll note my words changed, but the sense of the sentences did not. What else can one do when describing poetry but provide someone’s POV about what the poet was trying to convey (i.e., what the poet's POV was) and what your POV was as you read it? I didn't write the original; I simply translated it as someone requested on the Wikipedia:Translation into English page. 
:*I have only found a copy of a couple of Bull's poems to get my own impression (in Norwegian-don't think he's been translated-don't think he'd be easy to translate); I'd agree with the Norwegian author's characterization, but I'm not going to claim to be a poetry critic or an expert in poetry or literature. So I looked to other sources... 
:*I added a Bach quote which parallels the original assessment; perhaps even more critically than the one you disliked. But it is sourced and it is a direct quote.  
:*Karen Larson, in A History of Norway; Princeton University Press, describes his work as "somber."  
:If you still think the article is POV, you'll need to find someone to provide a different translation, or add new content from another source that suggests Bach is a cheerful poet; I doubt you'll find such a source.
: Cheers - Williamborg 06:54, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Didn't expect sources to be added when you revised it!  Quite good, and more than I expected.  I have no qualms anymore about the tone of the wroding in the article.  I did a little bit of work on the final paragraph as well. Kevin_b_er 08:39, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Can see what you meant about the tone of the review. I personally suspected it was the original article's author's attempt to convey why that, although depressing, the poet's work was good enough that he won broad recognition. That's one of the problems with translations; unless you know the topic yourself or have other sources, it is hard to do more than convey what the original author said as best you can. Glad you're more comfortable with it now. Williamborg 12:52, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Now onto the POV tag

message: An image used in this article, File:Olafbull.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:46, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Olafbull.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: I have cleaned up the article per Wikipedia:Manual of Style, including:
*removed dates links per WP:MOSUNLINKDATES;
* remove repeated links and links to ordinary English words per WP:OVERLINK;
* removed the "=" in in front of translations - this is not the standard style;
* spelled out acronyms on first use per WP:ACRONYM; * etc. 
Ground Zero | t 19:36, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up