lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Thumb Wars

message: In the start of the paragraph it says Loke Groundrunner but below,  in the Quotations section its says Luke. Are they both different characters or is it just a mistake? --Chameleon3322 00:27, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's Loke. Prometheus-X303- 05:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luke or Loke? 

message: :Image:19810.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:19810.jpg

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 19:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag 

message: I thought that the thumb parody of han solo was Indiana Ford, as was said by the parody of jabba the hutt.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.79.129.48 (talk) 22:15, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hand Duet vs Indiana Ford
Talk:Mountain Language

message: Added template.  The article needs documentation with reliable and verifiable sources. --NYScholar 03:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Citations added, banner removed, article re-assessed. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing citations

message: This article could still use a documented (well-sourced) plot synopsis section.  --NYScholar (talk) 01:25, 16 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot synopsis
Talk:Resampling

message: I can flesh out an article on resampling as in DSP.  Resampling as in statistics I don't know much about, but I bet it will end up wanting to be a separate article.  Well, how about I get a DSP article up and then worry about splitting. Eub 04:39, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  DSP vs. stats 

message: I am open to splitting this article into Resampling (audio) and Resampling (bitmap) (or something similar). I find a little too many articles on image scaling/image resampling (Image scaling, Subsampling, Pixel art scaling algorithms at least), some of them should be merged and that would be easier if image resampling/image scaling/bitmap resampling could be its own article. --Berland (talk) 05:48, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Or perhaps let Image scaling cover Resampling (bitmap). --Berland (talk) 18:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Resampling in audio and image are certainly sort the same thing, but I think the dimensionality difference is enough for it to warrant two different articles on Wikipedia. --Berland (talk) 19:32, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article split?
Talk:Robert Moore (Northern Ireland politician)

message: There are a number of links pointing to this page which are looking for the Movie Director Robert Moore, from eg Neil Simon, Eileen Brennan, Murder By Death (my first stub expansion yay). Can this be turned into a disambiguation page or something? A bit beyond my newbie powers... —Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnnyZen (talk • contribs) 
This article has been renamed from Robert Moore to Robert Moore (politician) as the result of a move request.
--Vclaw 12:00, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:Ruthwell Cross

message: I believe the Manchester Museum has a replica of the cross.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 09:43, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a plaster-cast copy and is mentioned here and here. But it's quite garish. I'm not sure of it's notable. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Replica

message: The translated verses are given at this BBC page. The cross was today discussed in Episode 2 of BBC Radio 4's The Matter of the North: "The Glories of Northumbria": , featuring Dr Chris Jones of the University of St Andrews. Should the translation of the verses be added to the article, or would this be too much duplication of the explanation at Dream of the Rood? Martinevans123 (talk) 17:55, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[Dream of the Rood]] verses 

message: Have added Scottish Gaelic to the IPA pronunciation /rɪvl/, as per this source. But it does not appear at Ruthwell. Is it used only for in the name of the cross? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:34, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  /rɪvl/ 
Talk:102 Dalmatians

message: 102 Dalmations was also filmed at St Pancras station in London,  where at the time a train to Paris was fictional (caught by Cruella DeVil to Paris on the Orient Express), this came non-fiction in 2007 when St Pancras began Eurostar services to Paris, Lille and Brussels.
78.154.126.118 (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 78.154.126.118, 13 November 2010 
Talk:Hepatitis G

message: Of course I don't actually know anything about hepatitis G, but it seems very unlikely that the disease could be both mild and acute, considering that they are antonyms. -Smedley Hirkum
:They are compatible in medical terms. Mild case vs. severe case. Acute disease vs. chronic disease. --FloNight 20:10, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mild one and acute 

message: While GB virus C is sometimes referred to as hepatitis G virus, that designation is historical.  It is not clear whether this virus actually causes human disease.  For a review, please see my article:
Lindenbach, B. D., and C. M. Rice. 2001. Flaviviridae:  The viruses and their replication, p. 991-1041. In D. M. Knipe and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields Virology, Fourth ed, vol. 1. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia.
I'd appreciate any input so we can clear this up.  --Brett Lindenbach 10:30, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  This page should be merged under GB_virus_C. Scray (talk) 13:17, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is hepatitis G a real human disease? 
Talk:Auditory-verbal therapy

message: I am doing some research for a class in Deaf Ed/Communication Sciences and Disorders.  I am very interested in the Auditory-Verbal Method I have become aware of through some of my reading.  One site I visited had a CI Simulation offered which I will include for your review if you have not already had the opportunity.  My questions are very basic in relation to the CI Simulation and CI implants.  
The simulation indicates the higher the number of channels, the better the amplified sound the individual will hear. Therefore, Does an implant have varying channels for selection to "program" the amplification or modulation for the individual or do CI's currently have a ceiling on the number of channels as technology continues to be developed?
:Sign edits, and don't inline text in editing mode or else it becomes long and unmanageable. Skinnyweed 00:43, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Archducal hat

message: No self-respecting monarch is "hatted" at his "petassation".  He his crowned at his coronation with a crown or coronet.  This is a candidate to be moved to Archducal coronet. --Jpbrenna 5 July 2005 16:01 (UTC)
:I realize that the -hut makes it a "hat," but that sounds too plebeian in English.  Maybe "Archducal headress?"
hm, i see your point. however, it really is called "Erzherzogshut", because there was also a coronet, that does not exist anymore however (if it ever did). i see that i need to write an article about the "Erbhuldigung" and what exactly went on there. because Austrian archdukes were never crowned, it was just a ceremony of hommage by the estates, where the "hat", if you like, was present as a symbol. you can look up Austrian Crown Jewels for more info... Antares911 9 July 2005 17:31 (UTC)
In Holy Roman and German Nobility one may distinguishes between " Krone - crown" and "Hut - headdress/hat". The Difference is a small part of ermine (Hut) instead of a golden circlet with jewels (Krone). There is no English word, you may use the German one or generate a neologism.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.177.59.127 (talk) 15:51, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Road cycling

message: Unless we link to all of the major bike manufacturers I don't see why we should link to Trek only. I'm going to remove that link. --Wikipediatastic 15:25, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing link to manufacturer

message: Looking at this article it would appear that people have become rather confused as to what it is about. I think it should be about utility cycling. However people ride on the road for a variety of different reasons, commuting, couriering, going to the shops, fun, sports etc. Do the last two count as utility cycling? I would argue that Sport certainly doesn't. However in the UK at least when cyclists talk about Road Cycling they are thinking of road racing. I think this article needs a total re-write. --Wikipediatastic 15:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Road cycling is a very general term and encompasses any kind of bicycling that is done on paved roads.  I think the current article defines it well enough.  The See Also section lists the relevant related subtopics. Limiting an article titled Road cycling to just utility cycling or just road bicycle racing doesn't make sense, especially since those specific topics already have their own dedicated articles.  --Serge 22:30, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To me this comes across as a pretty uninspiring article which could possibly be cut down to a stub with a bunch of links to more specific articles or possibly just a disambiguation page. There are however a lot of inward links many of them probably relate to a particular type of cycling. PeterEastern (talk) 16:22, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: First thing to do might be to cleanup those inbound links to the more correct article e.g. I see a lot that should be pointed towards road bicycle racing. SeveroTC 06:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope

message: Could I suggest moving the helmet section to the bicycle helmet page? Adenosine Triphosphate (talk) 00:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not think that is wise I think the small section on this page is required and not too long to be moved to the larger article. Paulpat99 (talk) 03:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  move helmet section
Talk:Cybershot

message: I created a new page named Cyber-shot (with hyphen) and moved everything on this page to the new page. A check with Sony's website reveals that the correct trademark name has a hyphen.DanMS 5 July 2005 16:34 (UTC)
:WP naming policy prefers common usage for article names. Also don't move pages by copying and pasting, use the "move" feature, or you lose the page history. ed g2s • talk 13:14, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved page
Talk:Battle of May Island

message: Hey, i just watched a great documentary on this incident, it can be viewed here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZS0RpOgdfQ but i don't know the best way to include it in the article, if someone more experienced than me could look into it that would be great - Gunnar Guðvarðarson (My Talk Page) 19:23, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Documentary 

message: Nash (2009) uses Wikipedia as a citation - how shall this be dealt with? DMT biscuit (talk) 17:22, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Circular Referencing  

message: I trust you will find this noteworthy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.212.163.77 (talk) 12:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend a link to http://www.dreadnoughtproject.org/tfs/index.php/Ernest_William_Leir .
Talk:Public service announcement

message: Currently, broadcasters are no longer required to run PSAs in the U.S., but at one point they were often broadcast to meet 'public interest' programming requirements for broadcasting license renewal. When did this change take place? I've been searching the web but the answer is apparently elusive. Ghostofnemo (talk) 02:26, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "Neither broadcast nor cable television, nor any other form of media, are today required to run PSAs, although television broadcasters are required to 'serve the public interest', and any PSAs they choose to run can count toward that obligation." https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/7715.pdf But doesn't say when the requirement was abolished. Ghostofnemo (talk) 02:40, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did running PSAs become voluntary in the United States? 

message: Please make sure to use proper grammar in this article, especially in the "Malaysia" section. This is not an informal conversation. Please make sure that the edited text is of good quality. Thank you. woo (talk) 08:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  GRAMMAR!
Talk:Akatsuki (Naruto)

message: Akatsuki (Naruto) was merged to List of Naruto villains#Akatsuki  per the consensus reached during lengthy discussions (archived here). As such, this talk page is, for all practical purposes, an archive and no new discussions should be started here. All discussions regarding the merged Akatsuki contents should be taken to Talk:List of Naruto villains.
The old talk archives, as well as the last discussions, are available in the archives linked above. The articles previous PR/GA/AfD history appers below AnmaFinotera (talk) 03:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: --Jac16888 Talk 16:23, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged

message: Redirect to subheading Akatsuki instead of Antagonist. DragonZero (Talk · Contribs) 20:27, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Done --Redrose64 (talk) 20:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request on 16 April 2013
Talk:Apartheid/Archive 6

message: :I have moved the following discussion here from my talk page. This follows an attempt to create a new article about international uses of the term Apartheid at Apartheid, which previously redirected to [[History of South Africa in the apartheid era  Zaian 21:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why should this redirect to [[History of South Africa in the apartheid era]] 

message: Then why is the article called "History of South Africa in the apartheid era" rather than just "apartheid"?Sonofzion 21:16, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not going to start a revert war, but History of South Africa in the apartheid era is a high-quality article, and South African apartheid is the only "indisputable" use of the term Apartheid, because that's where it was invented and officially used. The redirect to the specific name is to prevent the page being diluted with discussions of other countries, where the term has no official status. This is by far the preference of the editors of History of South Africa in the apartheid era and I respectfully request that you, in turn, respect this. Zaian 21:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

text: The consensus, achieved after much discussion and upheld over several years, is that Apartheid should redirect to History of South Africa in the apartheid era as the article about the official use of the term.  The longer name is to prevent confusion and controversial editing involving other countries (in particular Israel) from taking place at that location. That debate should not take place under the official Apartheid heading as it is very much secondary to the official historical use of the term in South Africa.  If you would read the many archives at both Talk:Apartheid and Talk:History of South Africa in the apartheid era you would see that your recent editing of the page Apartheid is a perhaps unintentional hijacking of this topic.  Again, I respectfully ask that you allow it to be returned to the previous status quo. Otherwise I've absolutely no doubt that a great many editors of the South African article will disagree with your move and see it as unilateral. Zaian 21:30, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: apartheid
Talk:Maria Beatrice of Savoy

message: The first version of this page from June 29, 2005 is a violation of my copyright on http://www.jacobite.ca/kings/mary3.htm
The fact that it has been slightly Wikified since then does not change the fact that this article is almost entirely my intellectual work.  Nobody has the right to just copy it into Wikipedia.
If somebody wants to write a completely new article for Wikipedia that is fine. Noel S McFerran July 5, 2005 17:46 (UTC)
==Mary II of Scotland?==
Why would the Jacobites recognize Maria as Mary II of Scotland, instead of Mary III? After all wasn't there a Mary I of Scotland reign: 1542-67 and a Mary II of Scotland reign: 1689-94. GoodDay 17:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation 

message: "The regnal numbers in England are a reference to her descent from Henrietta 'Minette' Stuart, Duchess of Orleans, youngest daughter of Charles I of England. After the death of the last of the Jacobite 'Pretenders', Henrietta's line-through her younger daughter (Anne-Marie of Orleans, wife of Victor Amadeus II of Savoy) became the sole legitimate line of descent of Charles I, and therefore superior to the Hanoverian claim which was based on descent from Charles I's sister Elizabeth."
Isn't her regnal number in England a reference to Mary I of Scotland's "de jure" reign in England as Mary II of England (Mary I of Scotland was regarded as rightful heiress of Mary I of England by Catholics since Elizabeth I was illegitamate and, more importantly, protestant, while the actual Mary II of England was not regarded as a rightful monarch by Catholics)? Surtsicna (talk) 22:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confused 

message: I do not think that should be Mary II; I think that was Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots, great-granddaughter of King Henry VII. As the discussions above, if Elizabeth I was barred from succession for her "illegitimacy", the queen should be this Mary, as Mary II of England.Heinrich ⅩⅦ von Bayern (talk) 05:40, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Corrected wrong link. Noel S McFerran (talk) 19:59, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's just that this isn't about the Mary Stuart we know as Mary (I) Queen of Scots. It is about Mary II of England and Scotland. What is the point of the Jacobite succession anyway when it recognizes Mary II of England and Scotland (and by extrapolation also William III / II), the very persons who replaces James II / VII in the first place? She should clearly be Mary II (of both England and Scotland...)Gerard von Hebel (talk) 14:17, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  No one ever recognized Mary of Scots as the Queen of England, except maybe her in her own mind. Elizabeth I was recognized by the Stuarts, who didn't like Mary anyway. Ericl (talk) 23:52, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Those who did not recognize Mary Stuart as "Queen Mary II of England"——Which Mary Stuart?
Talk:List of musical works in unusual time signatures

message: What should be the correct citation style? I'm thinking that for PD works (that are on IMSLP,) a link to the IMSLP page works, but what about other pieces? Link to its page on the publisher's site? Where does it go? I will begin converting the links for works on IMSLP to the new format. Wilh3lmGo here to trout me if I do a stupid 16:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: And that brings up another point, which is the standard of citation.  For classical works such as "Mars" we can presumably trust IMSLP or even find a published work that says "this piece is in 5/4."  But most rock is still under copyright, and mostly doesn't come with "scores" anyway.  If a piece sounds "eligible" and you search for it online, any sheet music you find might be just an arrangement, like for someone to play at home on a piano, and online sources might be of questionable provenance / legality. KevinBTheobald (talk) 02:14, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Style 

message: It happened again...
The article got too many templates and too big.
Per the discussion at the village pump (now located in Archive 198 as ), I have removed a few unnecessary references to other time signatures in entries and changed up at least 100 instances of 's time signatures with . I suggest changing  to directly call Su instead of using  (see Village Pump discussion) and fixing some of the references that are unclear and probably adding unnecessarily to the size. Wilh3lmTalk 11:50, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article limits 

message: Hi, there exist a folk song (perhaps in Bulgaria?) in 17/16 but grouped exactly as:
(2+2+2)+(2+2+3+2+2) ?
and 21/16 as:
(2+2+2)+(2+2+2+2+3+2+2) ?
I really have no idea where/whom to ask this question to. 
I read articles of B. Kremliev, Arom, T. Rice, Alice Singer, Con. Brailoiu but I found only 17 = 22222223 (i.e. with 223 ending instead of my requested 322),
and a variation (elongation) over a 16/16 Pousteno with 
17 = (2233)(223).
thanks a lot. best regards,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vastymedoisa (talk • contribs) 02:12, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  17/16 and 21/16 

message: I'm just curious because I can't find any rules about this. If you made piece of music that can be put on here, can you yourself put it on the wiki page? Isalick34 (talk) 16:40, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: That'd be a conflict of interest, so per WP:COI it'd be discouraged. It'd also need to be adequately supported by independent sourcing. — Czello (music) 16:42, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: ok thanks, I couldn't find the info Isalick34 (talk) 17:07, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music that you made
Talk:B vitamins

message: The Functions table has a link to the page on "Ketones" in the entry for B5.  Should this instead be a link to the page on Ketone Bodies (synthesis of which depends on CoA)?
Myoglobin (talk) 22:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ketones? 

message: There is no section on PQQ here. I will add one in the next few days. Meel11223 (talk) 15:29, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PQQ 

message: Which B vitamins are essential? Tirthankar de (talk) 12:42, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: All vitamins, by definition, are essential. The B vitamins listed in the tables in this article are essential. If something that was once called a vitamin is discovered to be non-essential, it is no longer considered a vitamin. Dcs002 (talk) 19:54, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  B vitamin 

message: See also: Cerebral folate deficiency, in which the levels of folate are normal in blood samples, but decreased in cerebrospinal fluid. A similar condition has recently been reported for vitamin B12, but not published yet. I'm not sure whether these are worthy of inclusion in this article, so I'm leaving a comment here. Cheers, --CopperKettle (talk) 12:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cerebral folate deficiency