Talk:Soviet characters of Command & Conquer

message: :Image:Romanov C&C.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 08:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Romanov C&C.JPG

message: :Image:Rapic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 03:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Rapic.jpg

message: In the Joseph Stalin section, it says: In the Soviet Victory, Great Britain has been conquered and Stalin is seen celebrating. However, in a plot devised by Stalin's shadowy advisor Kane, Nadia kills Stalin. After drinking poisoned tea prepared by Nadia, Stalin dies and the fate of the Soviet Union remains a mystery.
While Nadia states in the final cutscene that: "the Brotherhood (of Nod) will.. tire of the USSR in the early 1990's." She then continues with: "Until then, you'll keep the peace. Fight our battles where we must and you will remain our loyal and obedient servant. For the foreseeable future." After which Kane shot her of course.
I'd like to debate if that indeed is a mystery. AthCom1 (talk) 16:44, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mystery? 

message: Can someone confirm that bit about the unlockable cutscene with the Doctor at the end of the Empire campaign, after the player beats all campaigns? I didn't even know there was an expert mode. Please cofirm, and elaborate. Precisely, what happens?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.81.212.119 (talk) 21:38, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Zelinsky

message: I removed the line that talks about the Zelinsky's unlockable ending as there is no Proof (at least none that I could find) of this being so, but have quoted the section in this response incase some one proves me wrong.
"When the player beats the game on Expert on all three campaigns with the Allies last, it's mentioned in the epilogue that he began to rebuild the Temporal Displacement device with the aid of FutureTech in order to stop his past self from creating this timeline"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.162.113.34 (talk) 09:59, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zelinsky ending 

message: When you watch the FutureTech building explode in the final mission for the Empire, if you look closly, a faint amount of blue, typically found in Chronosphere use, is seen. Could we maybe add in that Zelinsky and some of the allied/soviet soldiers *may* have survived the attack and gone back in time to fix the mistake? I dont think that we can say he died for sure until that debate gets sorted out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.140.44.241 (talk) 02:08, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another Zelinsky section 

message: Natasha is supposed to carry a SVD (also commonly known as the Dragunov) sniper rifle on screen.(Confirmed by this source.)
It might be worth mentioning.--KelvinHOWiknerd(talk) 13:48, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dragunov for Natasha? 

message: Understandably, only non-player characters may be discussed on the whole page. However, the player himself is inferred as a character, whose picture is on the front cover of Red Alert 1 and Red Alert 2. The player does not play as him or her self, but instead plays as the man pictured on the front cover. His character is not developed as he is never shown except from the first-person point of view. However, it is implied (as the story line progresses due to accomplishing every mission) that he is a very loyal and "unstoppable" commander, who is always the key to winning for whichever side he plays on. "Comrade General" from Red Alert 2 is pictured on the front cover, and does not exist in the Allied campaign. Likewise, the Allied "Commander" does not exist as a character in the Soviet campaign. The Soviet player in Red Alert 1 is only referred to as "Comrade" or by his rank (he gets promoted as the missions progress, eventually becoming a general). Therefore he may be referred to as "Comrade General Senior", albeit unofficially. Ziqidel (talk) 15:59, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Whereabouts is the character on the cover of RA1 & RA2?  Just can't see it myself.  I don't think it's really necessary to add anything about the player character - for starters, he may not be unstoppable - if an incompetent player is unable to get past a certain level of the game, unstoppability stops there.   a_man_alone (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Comrade General"