Talk:Provisional Revolutionary Government of the Republic of South Vietnam

message: Does anyone know anything about the economy of the south at this time? Enlil Ninlil (talk) 02:07, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The business class was sent to reeducation camps. South Vietnam's economy depended on U.S. aid, which of course was cut off in 1974-75. It took until 1990 for the economy to return to the level it was in 1975. Kauffner (talk) 02:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Economy

message: Population
   •  1973 est. 	19,370,000 
       Density 	        111.4 /km²  (288.6 /sq mi)
Did this government control most South Vietnamese population in 1973 ?
Capital 
        Tây Ninh (1969–74)
        Sai Gon (1975–76)
And did ARVN lost Tay Ninh province from 1969 to 1974 ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.185.20.25 (talk) 18:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Provisional Revolutionary Government of the Republic of South Vietnam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041231052806/http://homepage3.nifty.com/thuan/music/index-e.html to http://homepage3.nifty.com/thuan/music/index-e.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I would argue that the phrase "provisional revolutionary government" is fairly self-explanatory, and that the current content of this section tracing the term back to 1848, the Bolshevik Revolution, and Algeria is largely irrelevant and should be deleted. Rosguill (talk) 23:14, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No response in over two weeks, I have gone ahead and implemented the proposed change.Rosguill (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of section on the history of the term "provisional revolutionary government" 

message: The link for Vice-Chairman and Minister of Education Nguyễn Văn Kiệt is to the page of an officer in the South Vietnamese Navy who won the Navy Cross during the war. This cannot be the same man. Is the name incorrect here, or were there two people with the same name? Molinari (talk) 18:52, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah that seems to pretty clearly be the wrong person. I would assume that there were simply two people with that same name, but regardless of the reason for the error, the link should be removed.Rosguill (talk) 22:28, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to wrong Nguyễn Văn Kiệt? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:08, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: This follows on this edit, which involves replacement of a  tag with a . It looks to me as if pages 333, 334, and 339 of the cited source (all previewable online here) date the VANDPF at 1976 and the installation of Nguyễn Hữu Thọ as President of the PRG of SV at 1975.That linked WP article on Thọ says that he was Chairman of the Consultative Council of the Provisional Revolutionary Government of the Republic of South Vietnam from 1969 to 1975 (implying that the PRG of SV existed in 1969) . I'm guessing that the sequencing of this fits together, but the details of that sequencing is not clear to me from the WP articles. Wtmitchell  (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 11:05, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sequencing 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: The map in the current version makes no sense, the Republic of South Vietnam never claimed the territory of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam, in fact they were their ally. The old map makes much more sense here. --Donald Trung (talk)  11:39, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map makes no sense