lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mike's Murder (soundtrack)

message: Allmusic and amazon.com both give 1983 as the original year of release for this, so I'm going to change it (from 1984).--Register allocation 02:51, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/joe-jackson-mn0000784732/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 02:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Conditional entropy

message: Why does equivocation (information theory) redirect here? If the two terms are equivalent, can someone put equivocation in the lead? Stevage 11:27, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This was done. 178.38.76.15 (talk) 15:02, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I(A,B) -- the mutual information appears without motivation or explanation.  It is great to link to mutual information, but it should be explained, at the least, why understanding the relation to mutual information helps one understand conditional entropy.  Also, the picture at the top of the page makes no sense without understanding this relationship.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.159.160.249 (talk) 05:59, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anything having to do with mutual information 

message: I removed the "expert attention" flag from the "Bayes' rule" section. The complaint really concerned only one line, the statement about Bayes' rule being false for quantum conditional entropy. I moved this claim to the following section, which introduces quantum conditional entropy. The claim needs a citation. 178.38.76.15 (talk) 14:55, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed flag
Talk:Western gull

message: Took the liberty of replacing the old western gull pic by a new one. Could anyone please double check if this is really a Western Gull. To quote User:Chick Bowen: "The faded pink legs, clean white (unstreaked) neck, and broad white tips of the tertial feathers are pretty clear to me." (commons:User_talk:Dschwen). --Dschwen 11:41, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced pic 

message: 96.41.164.58 (talk) 06:57, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Needs Expansion

message: Added this as part of the feeding ritual, pilfering milk from the elephant seal....even though the citation focuses on feral cats, further down in the article text it is stated:
"A similar behavior was carried out by western gulls; they approached a pup and pecked on the pup's head, causing it to retreat, and then positioned their beak sideways to receive the milk dripping from the teat of the female elephant seal. This was observed several times during our stay at Guadalupe, always during daylight hours. The perpetrators were adult gulls and second year chicks."
   RomanGrandpa (talk) 14:43, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Milk Stealing
Talk:Captain Planet and the Planeteers (video game)

message: Surely the "platforms" section needs expanding? At the bottom of the article it says the game was available on Amiga, Amstrad, Nintendo and ZX Spectrum. However, it also says "Nintendo Entertainment System-only games", which is not true. The sidebox also says NES as the platform. This is quite obviously wrong. There is even a link to a site with the Spectrum version of the game! 77.99.98.37 (talk) 10:33, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platforms
Talk:Louis Hjelmslev

message: I went through this article and linked a number of terms, corrected other links, and overall tried to copy edit as well as de-academicise the text somewhat.  I only know Hjelmslev's theories through chapter 1 of Eco's Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language, though -- that's as far as I am right now -- so forgive any factual inaccuracies I may have introduced. --Andymussell 23:06, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had not looked at this for a while and it seems to have drifted a bit. Thanks for tidying it up. David91 02:24, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  revisions 
Talk:Tin pest

message: Today's first edit (02:43 26 Sep 2008) adds 18 lines copied too directly from the reference added (although not cited in-line in the section added). This could constitute a copyright violation and needs to be rewritten. 
In fact some of the information is already in the article. The rest is interesting and can certainly be added, but it has to be done in an encyclopedic style - select the most important points which are not already in the article, paraphrase, rearrange. Also remove phrases such as "I believe", and explain where the photo is to be found. Dirac66 (talk) 15:27, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copy vio 

message: The information contained in the stub article, White tin, is easily found within the Tin article. I therefore suggest that the stub article be merged into the Tin pest article (some of the information is already contained therein). The White tin stub article is redundant.
Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 22:05, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the uncontested objection and no support. Klbrain (talk) 15:12, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from White tin stub
Talk:Astomi

message: What?
These creatures are not Hindu, in any way, shape, form or fashion! They were said to live in India, but that part of the myth, just like every other part of it, came from Greece and Rome. They are part of Greek and Roman myth, with their story being told by Pliny the Elder, a ROMAN, and Megasthenes, a GREEK.
This needs badly to be changed. 
The Penultimate (talk) 01:47, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
Category talk:Mobile phones

message: I notice that the Motorola phones are in disarray, as far as how they are named and categorized.  Since the majority of the phones in the Mobile phones category are listed as “Nokia XXX”, it only makes sense that phones by other companies are listed in the same way: (example: “Motorola V551” not “V551”).
I also notice a problem with categorization, which also needs to be consistent. Motorola phones should be categorized under Category: Mobile phones and Category:Motorola products. I have found at least 1 or 2 that are not.
Let’s make this somewhat organized, is anyone with me? Mikecnn 12:34, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Only actual phones should be in this category. Mobile software, websites, partners, content providers, publishers, carriers, etc. should be in Category Mobile.  Mathiastck 20:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency when naming and categorizing phones 

message: Anything now given a Mobile phones category should be phones, i.e. dialable through the telephone network or Internet, and not other mobile devices such as pagers, CB radios, walkie-talkies, police radios, etc. which do not connect to the telephone network and are not dialable.  To preserve this distinction, categories containing the word phone such as mobile phone should be preserved and not replaced by a broader category such as mobile telecommunications user equipment. Greensburger (talk) 00:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a definition to the main category page to clearly define what is and is not a phone (hopefully).  If you think the definition is too broad or narrow or otherwise needs adjustment, please discuss.Mojodaddy (talk) 17:06, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of phone
Talk:John Hassall (musician)

message: Does anyone else think it would be okay to do some editing to all that back story? It seems as though the article tells the libs' story for a little bit. Stan weller 12:50, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: But the Libertines' story is part of Hassall's story, isn't it? I mean, they're might be one or two lines in the article that don't directly involve Hassall, but I think they help flesh out the article a bit, since it's quite short as it is. I don't think removing any of it would benefit the article. faithless (speak) 18:58, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Have removed "He is the son of a great archaeologist" from the article. If anyone can source it, it can be we-instated. Someplace else (talk) 14:45, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed curio 
Talk:A Different Kind of Weather

message: I'll have a scan of the album cover ready by Monday, and hopefully some trivia too! Danielnez1 12:50, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The image is added(but somehow I was logged out when I did it :-S). Danielnez1 12:01, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Danielnez1 13:13, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dead Men Don't Wear Plaid

message: According to the IMDB trivia entry, "The car accident at the beginning of the movie (the fake killing of the scientist) is taken from Keeper of the Flame (1942). The movie however is not credited" --Shantavira 12:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I recall (not sure from where) that the film refers to Terre Haute because Martin had made a joke about the city in his stand-up act, upsetting the city's residents. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 19:08, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, here's the background, I didn't have it quite right. Is it worth mentioning in this article, or too trivial? -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 19:11, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terre Haute 

message: Folks, we all understand that 'dead men dont wear plate' was something Marlowe might have said in the early 1980s, when 'plate' was a common slang expression for 'plate armour'; while Reardon might have heard that 'dead men dont wear plaid' ( not wiling to believe in something like a perfect surveillance state, homeland security et al )  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A0A:A549:5915:0:D964:10EF:9D0D:B1F2 (talk) 23:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The year of the most reasoned rat
Talk:Benjamin Buchloh

message: This is just the basic skeleton of an article, with a few links. Blima3000 13:33, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Fun facts..? Really? That a person's name is reminiscent of a drink, is not something I'd expect to find in an encyclopedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.89.144.219 (talk) 20:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fun facts
Talk:Yve-Alain Bois

message: This is just the basic skeleton of an article with a few links. Blima3000 13:33, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Energy filtered transmission electron microscopy

message: * German Wiki.
* Lecture of Prof. Helmut Kohl at Münster University. Germany
The Big Problem is: I did not find an explanation of EFTEM anywhere, they just keep showing me these fancy pictures at their talks.
I am more familar with optic with photons.
--Arnero 13:34, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is starting to look good! I've added a reference under "further reading".
O. Prytz 11:14, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Source
Talk:Wow! signal

message: Can someone check this? As far as I'm aware, big ear didn't have the ability to determine if there was AM/FM modulation, this article outright states that the signal was unmodulated. I don't think we have any way of knowing that. 203.185.220.115 (talk) 22:08, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ref 9 says the signal was unmodulated, which is why the article says so as well. Primefac (talk) 09:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modulation  

message: Can someone check this? The article correctly states that "The Wow! signal had a bandwidth of less than 10 kHz." Then it claims that the fractional bandwidth is about 1%. But 10kHz / 1420MHz is about 0.0007%.
Also, it's not the absolute bandwidth that matters for SETI; it's the relative bandwidth. So the comparison with the absolute bandwidth of masers is irrelevant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.154.191.214 (talk) 03:57, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bandwidth  

message: Is a big statement of opinion and maybe not how a signal expert would frame it.  Quote is from Vice, a pop mag, and the source of the opinion is someone listed as "science reporter" but without any indication of qualifications there or at other sources such as her professional bio.  On that basis should be corrected IMO. Delete unless authoritative source is found for it. 71.191.175.136 (talk) 04:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked it over and tried to connect it to what more substantial sources had to say—and I agree. Removed for now until it or a similar claim can be readded with firmer grounding. Remsense诉 04:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation 3
Talk:J. J. Singh

message: I have delete the massive cut and paste by an IP user from: http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/LAND-FORCES/Army/Army-Chiefs/Chiefs-Army24.html.  This text was clearly labelled "Copyright © BHARAT RAKSHAK." Rich   Farmbrough. 13:39, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: I've just removed unverified, unsubstantiated and very obviously partisan comments from the biography. I've also left a comment on the IP user's talk page at (125.63.75.210).  vIkSiT (talk) 22:53, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel Words 
Talk:A Star Is Born

message: I've created a new page for each of the three versions of this film.  Naturally there are a lot of pages which will link back to this page, so before anyone starts yelling at me about this, rest assured, I intend to go back and fix all the links.  There are a lot though, so it will take a little time, but I am onto it.   So please, no nasty messages like I've had in the past, ok?  ;-) Rossrs 13:41, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Rossrs, I congratulate you on being bold by going ahead and creating three separate pages for the three films. I firmly believe that every film should have their own wiki article including remakes, so well done. However, I'm going to make one tiny change. According to the naming conventions for films, all every word in the film's title is to be capitalised except, conjunctions (and, but, or, nor, for, yet, so), prepositions (to, over, through) or articles (an, a, the, that, any, some, one, these, those). Therefore, since the word "is" isn't a conjunction, preposition or an article, the word is to be in capitals. -- Ianblair23 (talk) 02:11, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Ian.  Well, I wasn't sure what was the right convention, so thanks for fixing these articles.  I'll ensure that all the links are fixed over the next few days also. Rossrs 02:41, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation of new pages for each film
Talk:Chromosome 21

message: Some text in this article was originally taken from http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/chromosome=21 (public domain)
*Removing parenthetical comment "(not counting the Y chromosome)". In the page history the author justifies this change by stating that the Y chromosome is actually smaller.  This is incorrect.  The current genome build (36.2) lists the Y chromosome as 57.8 million nucleotides and chromosome 21 as 46.9 million nucleotides in length, making it the smallest chromosome as the initial page author indicated.  The chr 21 and Y pages do list the correct sizes though. --- Pat shea
*PROBLEM: The "Human chromosomes" template table did not show up.
*DISCUSSION: The table is in the HTML markup.
*WORKS WITH: Mozilla Firefox 1.0.5 and 2.8.5dev.16.
*FAILS WITH: Mozilla 1.7.12
*DIAGNOSTIC: Probable browser error - report to maintainer.
--- Wikiborg 00:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If chromosome 21 is smaller than chromosome 22, then why are they numbered that way?  With the exception of the sex chromosomes, the numbering is otherwise from biggest to smallest, so why aren't 21 and 22 numbered the other way around? Nik42 (talk) 01:12, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbering 

message: The S100B gene is also located at the end of chromosome 21, it should be added, but my formatting skills are sub par.
"Clustered organization of S100 genes in human and mouse" 1998 Katrin Ridinger, Evelyn, Felix K. Niggli, Claus W. Heizmann,Beat W. Scha«fer [i]Biochimica et Biophysica Acta[/i] 1448. 254-263
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=MImg&_imagekey=B6T20-3VCR29C-C-9&_cdi=4904&_user=8903414&_pii=S0167488998001372&_origin=search&_coverDate=12%2F10%2F1998&_sk=985519997&view=c&wchp=dGLbVzz-zSkzS&md5=32432fa0d3206972481dda3147bfef48&ie=/sdarticle.pdf  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.15.46.78 (talk) 22:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  S100B 

message: Shouldn't it say it's the smallest human autosome? The Y chromosome is smaller. Or are we talking about found in all humans, regardless of sex?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FamAD123 (talk • contribs) 15:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: FamAD123Yes, I changed it. DennisPietras (talk) 19:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smallest Human Chromosome?
Talk:Raul Seixas

message: Seixas was not SENT into exile but, instead, SELF-EXILED himself following his presumed detention by Ditadura agents.
This information you find into his biography published by Folha de São Paulo newspaper and came from an account directly told by Sylvio Passos. --Homem de Letras (talk) 14:06, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong! 
Talk:Walking Distance

message: There should be more definitions for this "walking distance" word.
For exmaple, What is a normal walking distance for regular people?
2 miles or 10 miles??
:: In that episode, it's a mile and a half. __Kar98 (talk) 23:37, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Define

message: The following is unsourced information:
*The episode was filmed predominantly at sets built for the 1959 television movie remake of Meet Me in St. Louis. The carousel used in the episode was a rental.
*The evocative string music for this episode by Bernard Herrmann was reused in later episodes of the series.
While this is interesting, we can't use it unless you provide a source. Also, none of this is really trivia, as trivia by its definition is "unimportant information" - it therefore shouldn't be in a trivia section but instead the information should be incorporated into the main article. - Tbsdy lives (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) talk 05:44, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced material 

message: ...it's spelled both ways in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.19.76.64 (talk) 09:06, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sloan or Sloane? 

message: I found "He drives away, content for once to live his life in his own age group. yup"  wit "yup" having been inserted last night.  What is the meaning of "yup" being inserted here? Carlm0404 (talk) 16:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the meaning of this?
Talk:Inner Healing Movement

message: This article uses the religioustolerance.org website as either a reference or a link. Please see the discussion on Wikipedia talk:Verifiability/Religioustolerance.org and Wikipedia:Verifiability/Religioustolerance.org as to whether Wikipedia should cite the religioustolerance.org website, jguk 14:05, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Religioustolerance.org

message: This page looks like a link farm. It is time to go through and delete those of a self-published nature, which is most of them. External links should meet WP standards, especially given the brevity of this article. MatthewTStone (talk) 22:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now gone through and removed all links that don't meet basic WP guidelines. The article still needs considerable work to expand Agnes Sanford's role in particular. I would also suggest that Theophostic should perhaps be merged into this page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by MatthewTStone (talk • contribs) 01:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Too many external links, too many self-published

message: An editor left this note below the references, so I've moved it here:
"As the Australian psychologist named in the article, please note the judgment passed by the Queensland Health Practitioners Tribunal was 'not guilty' of malpractice which is the reason Hearing costs were shared between myself and the Psychologist's Registration Board. Only as an aside, and not as part of the proceedings, was I advised that both the APS and the Psychologist's Registration Board regarded the use of TPM as inappropriate. Ref 7 AAP General News to an article dated Oct 25, 2006 did not report on the actual proceedings of the Tribunal but on a story it wished to publish.
Irene Moreau"
Khazar2 (talk) 18:01, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal note 

message: Both Mary Sanford and her son John are dead.  This sentence needs to be changed to correct that---Agnes is the mother of Jungian analyst, Jack Sanford.johncheverly 03:30, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Both are D-e-d. 

message: "While these are valid concerns, they have no creditability. TPM has a valid measure of effectiveness in helping people work through their traumatic histories." - what is the mesure of effectiveness?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Killerkiwi2005 (talk • contribs) 03:14, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opionion 

message: Updated to include key figures in the inner healing movement and current developments in the movement. Please fill in other key figures and information on those already listed as you have resources to do so.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lecile (talk • contribs) 00:51, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key Figures
Talk:Religion in Canada

message: Should the colour "coded" maps be removed? Or is there a version of them with a legend included? They show a map of Canada, with each province shaded according to the percent of (1) Christians, and (2) Irreligious. But there is no legend to give any idea of what the colours mean.
 
Does darker indicate a higher percentage, or is it vice versa? Even if you made the "obvious" (?) assumption that darker is a higher number, there's no indication of the range represented. If the reader is to assume that the tables nearby are based on the same data, the percentage of Christians ranges from about 45% to 95%, and the percentage of irreligious from about 6% to 50%. To my mind, the reader glancing at the maps is left with more questions than answers.   signed, Willondon (talk)  18:13, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: fixed.  The trick is looking at what code was used to create the legends on the description page in commons --Erp (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I see now. Great, thanks. I learn something new every day. It's exhausting.   signed, Willondon (talk)  22:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What use are the colour coded maps without a legend? 

message: It looks like "no religion" is not treated as a prioritized option in the diagram. 64.137.146.189 (talk) 06:19, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Moxy- 06:49, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is no religion listed not listed first at 34.1% in the pie chart