Talk:Sheylanli

message: Tags have been placed because this article looks like blatant POV pushing. Azerbaijani propaganda sites are being used as sources. Other sources are being used that do not support what is written. For instance, the UN source doesn't say that Armenian military forces are in control of the region, it says local Armenian forces. Gulmammad reverted my correction. Gulmammad also claims above that since he knows something to be true it should be added in the article. Hence I am also going to put an OR tag. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 05:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Why do you think Azerbaijani site want to put info saying that in Azerbaijan there is Kurdish population? Why do you think Voice of Karabakh is a propaganda site? Besides, you shouldn't say this in wikipedia since you have a good knowledge related Armenian-Azerbaijani arbitrations. I have provided at least one source which says the fact is true. Now you add another source which says it isn't true, Sheylanli wasn't a Kurdish village. Gülməmməd Talk 05:14, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tags 

message: Voice of Karabakh is not a reliable source and I have removed it as such it is basically a propaganda site. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 01:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice of Karabakh source 

message: Here is the complete edit summary to this edit. In edit summary I wanted to say blocked IP as other editor in his edit summary mentioned that the ref. had been provided by Gulmammad.
Gülməmməd Talk 03:40, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: tihs article is not reliable and is based on propagand materials by gulmammad so tags will be returned for a neutral version.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sevan79 (talk • contribs) 12:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh really? I didn't know The Guardian,   Institute for War and Peace Reporting, and the U.S. Department of State could publish propaganda materials which I used here. I am sorry. Gülməmməd Talk 19:49, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary of the edit 

message: I have initiated a discussion of this article at the reliable sources noticeboard. Please add your thoughts here. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 00:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added a tag to describe the problems with this article and to send the reader to the WP:RSN reliable sources noticeboard to help resolve the problems with this article. user:Gulmammad has in the past removed tags without any good explanation. Please do not remove this tag as it is being used to get a broader discussion at the reliable sources noticeboard. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 21:05, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion hasn't finished yet and according to its current stage, you cannot put any tag to the article. Gülməmməd Talk 06:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:RSN]] discussion of this article 

message: As discussed here and at WP:RSN. Those images were taking by the author of this article and are not reliably sourced. I am removing them and hope that reliably sourced images can be found in the future. Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 04:22, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: Three sources are used to describe who controls the region. One is institute of war and peace, the other is the Guardian and the third is a UN resolution. The Institute of War and Peace and the Guardian are both editorials. So the best source is the UN resolution. The UN resolution describes the occupiers as "local Armenian forces". Hence the article should either say:
1) local Armenian forces 
2) forces of the Nagorno-Karabakh Armenians 
or 
3) forces of the Nagorno-Karabakh Republic. 
Which of the three do you think best describes the situation? Pocopocopocopoco (talk) 02:13, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: First let me ask you a question: Has NKR been recognized by any member of the UN? Why the republic of Armenia doesn't recognize what is called NKR? If even the republic of Armenia doesn't recognize proposed another Armenian republic, then why should we, Wikipedia, recognize it? Why do we need to show internationally recognized region of Azerbaijan under the name of NKR? Let us wait until it will be internationally recognized.
Regarding removed tags, the tag on the ref. #9 removed because the same fact is in the book but we don't have an access with a click and therefore we can keep it without tagging. The last two tags removed because the sources independently (one of them is Armenian and another Azerbaijani source) support the same fact, which is presented in the article. Gülməmməd Talk 03:42, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The area is controlled by the forces of the Nagorno-Karabakh republic not the Armenian Military forces

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sheylanli. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080517144404/http://www.karabakh-doc.azerall.info/ru/anti-terror/ater21eng.htm to http://karabakh-doc.azerall.info/ru/anti-terror/ater21eng.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018)