Talk:Heqin

message: I am pretty sure this concept is not exclusively Chinese. I am pretty certain there were marriages between European royal families in the past that were arranged to install trust and peace between nations, albeit it doesn't always work. --Voidvector 02:06, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be merged with Marriage of state. --Cold Season (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

text: If there is re-organization maybe the main category could be arranged marriages, and under marriages of state could be sub-categories of the type to help bring peace(peace-weaver, Helen of Troy, Han princess with Modu Chanyu) vs to continue the royal bloodline  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aufumy (talk • contribs) 00:11, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English word for this 

message: Why does this person keep erasing information on this topic? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.3.18.38 (talk)  
:Don't play coy here. I've clearly stated that I've removed uncited information, or are you just to dumb to read? Perhaps you should go and read WP:UNSOURCED before making idiotic accusations again. It's "funny" that the one citation in this article came from me adding it. You have had months to add references by now. --Cold Season (talk) 01:59, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism by Cold Season

message: This edit established the usage of the page as . Kindly maintain it consistently, pending a new consensus to the contrary. — LlywelynII 00:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:ERA

message: Similarly, this edit established the usage of the page as American English and, again, kindly follow it consistently, pending a new consensus to the contrary. — LlywelynII 01:48, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:ENGVAR

message: Thor's Axe is not only restoring his edits were only about headings and the Qing section. He readded other unsourced changes by Montalk123 to the content of other sections relating to ethnicity and not just the headings among them openly unsourced and false like saying Khitan are "a proto Mongol-Manchu-Korean people" and claiming a Xianbei princess of northern Wei was a Chinese in "428: Emperor Mingyuan of Northern Wei marries off his Chinese daughter, Princess Shiping (始平公主), to non-Chinese Helian Chang, Emperor of Xia.",
claiming Qu Boya of Gaochang was non Chinese when the Qu family was Han Chinese and calling a Xianbei Murong princess as Chinese "Princess Yanjun (燕郡公主) (surname Murong (慕容))". Opasney (talk) 15:49, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Your edits to many section titles prevented me from undoing Montalk123's vandalism which  I clearly said was vandalism in the edit summary, without reverting your edits as well. When I reverted back to the unvandalized version if you were really so only concerned about the Qing section instead of the section titles you could have easily copied and pasted the Qing section back in and manually fixed the titles after I reverted back to the clean version. Reverting unsourced vandalism takes precedent over everything else including petty issues like section title formatting and you kept readding the unsourced vandalism after being informed about it three times.Opasney (talk) 02:25, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

text: Yet again I'd ask you to review WP:NPA - I realize I'm throwing a reference back to this policy around in a lot of places. That's because I would really like you to read this policy and start following it please. Simonm223 (talk) 12:59, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits by Thor's Axe 

message: Each forces and dynasties was assigned a heading. The previous version classified all "Non-Han" dynasties into a subcategory, which I think is not appropriate.
China's history was shared by all ethnic groups involved in it, and all the nations and dynasties established should be treated equally.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thor's Axe (talk • contribs) 00:05, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headings changed 

message: * There are duplicates in Qing section. The marriage of Li Yong Fang and Sun Sike's son were both mentioned twice.
* Nian Gengyao was a Qing official and his marriage does not satisfy the criteria of the page: the marriage should be between China and a neighbouring state.
* There is currently a dispute about the mass marriage. There is evidence against the ethnic background of the women participated.
Thor's Axe (talk) 13:43, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If there  is a dispute regarding information within reliable sources, we report both; we don't exclude a reliable source. Please re-insert the reliably sourced information you removed immediately. Simonm223 (talk) 13:46, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note the information was kept. It was just rearranged and put into the right paragraph. Thor's Axe (talk) 13:57, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you deleted several sources between those two edits. Please stop with these major edits until consensus is reached at talk. Simonm223 (talk) 13:57, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not see the need of consensus for deleting duplicated materials. When the same event was described twice it is common sense to remove them. Thor's Axe (talk) 13:59, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This is WP:IDHT again. You deleted reliably sourced content and not just content stated twice in the article. Furthermore, WP:CONSENSUS is the fundamental model for editorial decision making - even if you believe that there is duplicate information on the page that should be removed, the WP:ONUS is on you to demonstrate this to be the case and gain consensus if that removal is disputed. Simonm223 (talk) 15:16, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Here, look at the difference between these two diffs. Here's your edit and here's my edit. Do you see how I maintained the sources while removing the duplicate text. This takes more work than just cutting, but it's much less likely to pull a revert, as it's clear from the diff that I actually just cropped duplicated text rather than removing sources. Simonm223 (talk) 16:32, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove irrelevant materials