lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Nuttall Encyclopædia

message: What country was this published in? Loganberry (Talk) 02:39, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing that our article says London, I would assume the UK. - Thanks, Hoshie |  06:51, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: London, California no doubt. :P ---J.S  (T/C/WRE) 07:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What country was this published in?

message: I note that both the Gutenberg edition and the modern reprint  use the ligature, so it seems pretty definite that's what we should have. Stan 20:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ahh, I thought it was spelt wrong! ~ JFBurton 16:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Flight suit

message: I've added in a link to fire retardant clothing per the recent anon editor's changes. However, as said editor can see, the second image simply doesn't fit on the page, and attempts to use forced whitespace to wedge the image in don't really help the content of the page any. -Harmil 02:54, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Dunno why I said you were anon, there. Sorry Michael Reiter. My bad. -Harmil 02:55, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits

message: Could we get a different main picture for this article? The SR-71 pressure suit is not exactly indicative of a standard flight suit (which don't have pressure helmets, etc.) --OuroborosCobra (talk) 22:04, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:University of Wisconsin Colleges

message: I'm not from the state, but when I tried accessing the UW-Manitowoc bookstore, it redirected to Green Bay. And apparently it's now not a two year system campus, but a satellite of UWGB. I think UWSP also has its own sattelite that used to be a UW College. But I can't find anything definitive about this possible reorganization. Anyone else familiar with UW and want to chime in? Time to redo this page? YellowAries2010 (talk) 07:45, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retooling/rebranding?
Talk:Scotia, New York

message: Glen was Alexander's last name.  I realize that one source has the wording "Alexander Lindsey of Glen", but I don't know why.
:The naming convention Scotish families and clans, can refer to local regions or areas, to help distinguish themselves from other clans with the same sur names.LanceBarber (talk) 06:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Falling Hare

message: It's fine to write about the ways in which the cartoon is dated, and to mention the use of folk songs, but those are separate and unrelated topics. The use of songs that already were old when the cartoon was made is not an example of the cartoon being dated. Richard K. Carson (talk) 05:57, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dated vs. folk songs 

message: I do not understand this sentence:
:: In the series Revolution, The TV screen that Bugs Bunny is looking at a window, making him sick and turning pink in this animated cartoon, is completely shut off and shut down forever.
Maybe this means: "Part of Falling Hare is seen on a TV screen in Revolution; the last thing shown, before the TV is permanently turned off, is Bugs looking at a window and turning pink."  (Turned off because all broadcasting stops?)  But maybe it means something else. —Tamfang (talk) 02:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revolution 

message: The article states that UA forgot to renew this cartoon in 1967, but 28 years after 1943 is 1971. Falling Hare would not have needed to be renewed for another 4 years. I have decided not to make the change myself as there could easily be some complication to this that I am not aware of. Copyright law can be a confusing mess sometimes, and I also want to assume good faith in the person who originally included this fact. 71.36.112.181 (talk) 15:44, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public Domain entry date
Talk:List of Korean-language poets

message: There is no need for an identical list just because it is in chronological order??
*I made this duplicate on purpose because some people will look alphabetically while others will be searching chronologically.  I am constantly being irritated at lists that are only one or the other.  Wik has enough space to hold both. Kdammers 08:18, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: duplicate list

message: * Pak No-hae (born 1956) 
* Kim Seung-hee (born 1952)
* Kim Jong-chul (born 1947)
* Kim Young-moo (1944-2001)
* Choi Seung-ho (born 1942)
* Oh Se-young (born 1942)
* Kim Kwang-kyu (born 1941)
* Hwang Tong-gyu (born 1938)
* Ko Ûn (born 1933)
* Park Yee-moon (born 1930)
* Kim Jong-kil (born 1926)
* Pak In-hwan (1926-1956)
* Hong Yun-suk (born 1925)
* Kim Ch'un-su (1922-2004)
* Kim Su-yông (1921-1968)
* Cho Chi-hun (1920-1968)
* Ku Sang (1919-2004)
* Yun Dong-ju (1918-1945)
* Pak Mog-wôl (1916-1978)
* Sô Chông-ju (1915-2000)
* Yi Sang (1910-1937)
* Yu Chi-hwan (1908-1967}
* Im Hwa (1908-1953)
* Yi Yuk-sa (1904-1944)
* Kim Yông-nang (1903-1950)
* Chông Chi-yong (1902-?)
* Kim So-wôl (1902-1934)
* Yi San-ghwa (1901-1943)
* Chu Yo-han (1900-1980)
Also there should be NO red dead links, all poets should have articles written, this is an encyclopedia and not an empty book WayneRay 03:46, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronological listing

message: I have put Ko under Ko, since that is his family name (with-out bringing his personal name into conformity with the standard form of hyphen and only one capital).  Tis is in contrast with the way  his name is normally ordered in books in English that he himself has brought out.  If what I have done (here and at Ko's page) is not in accord with Wik conventions, then some-one please make the changes or tell me to do so. Kdammers 08:39, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ko's name 

message: Shoudn't it be "List of Korean-language poets"?Kdammers (talk) 02:36, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article's title 

message: should jeong ji-yong  (jung ji-yong) be added?  of course, first there would have to be an individual article.  the korean wikipedia (https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EC%A0%95%EC%A7%80%EC%9A%A9) has a long article on the poet.Kdammers (talk) 08:00, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  jeong ji-yong
Talk:RV Belgica

message: Is the correct title for this page SS Belgica? Belgica should redirect to Gallia Belgica, not to a ship. I am making Belgica (disambiguation) to serve all seekers. --Wetman 03:09, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No i don't think so. Belgian ships do not use the standard prefixes. Therefore according to the naming conventions for ships, this page should best be titled "Belgica (ship)" or "Belgian Oceanografic Research Vessel Belgica". i personally prefer the former. --Plastictv 09:25, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: The ship departs Belgium August 1897, gets stuck in the ice in February 1897 (i.e. 6 months earlier!), and gets back in Belgium in November 2008 (21 months later), which would mean that the trip from Antarctica back to Belgium took them 8 months (they were stuck for 13 months). Can someone correct these dates, as they are currently impossible... Fram 10:47, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've corrected them accroding to what is stated in the article Adrien de Gerlachen as those seem more consistent. If they are incorrect, please correct them in both artciels, and reference it. Fram 11:18, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates

message: This article covers two ships. Each should have its own article, therefore I propose that this article be split and the title converted to a shipindex page. Mjroots (talk) 13:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've made a start on the earlier ship. Anyone want to tackle the current Belgica? Suggest leaving the article as it is until such time as both articles are created, then turning it into a shipindex page - As for , at least 7 ships have carried the name Belgica. Mjroots (talk) 21:54, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  article now created. Mjroots (talk) 14:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

text:  also created. Mjroots (talk) 16:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a quick run around the interwikis, but they could probably do with checking.  Lack of language skills isn't too much problem as there are dates and pictures hinting at the scope of the articles.  Rich Farmbrough, 07:00, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed split
Talk:Attaque 77

message: The author of this article is a very good fan of the band named: SEBASTIAN CALVE77I.
It was traslated by me Nicanor5.
This article is part of the project Rock in Wiki to have articles of  bands of South America.
Nicanor5 03:11, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Author of this article

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 23:58, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag
Talk:Hinduism in Pakistan

message: The issues with this article are claimed to be tone and POV. Unfortunately, the user(s) who added the template hasn't left any justification in the talk page so I don't know what concerns they had. The article seems well-written and covers the subject comprehensively. It's also very well-cited. Many of the citations are to scholarly works like Jamal Malik's book "Islam in South Asia: A Short History". I propose that this template be removed. 
As mentioned previously I'm removing the template. Czar-peter-123 (talk) 02:47, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the multiple issues template
Talk:Shoot 'em up

message: 90% of the subgenres listed in this article are "[something] shooter," so shouldn't the title of this article be "Shooter," since that's clearly the most commonly used umbrella term as demonstrated by the article?  Xscapist (talk) 16:31, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change title to Shooter? 

message: Can such game series as Catacomb 3d, Wolfenstein 3d, Doom, Duke Nukem 3D, Serious Sam, Painkiller and the like be considered First Person 3D Run and gun or Shoot 'em up?  Unlike tactical, cooperative and multiplayer shooters, here the protagonist has superior firepower, can confront a large number of opponents at once and is often forced to destroy everyone in order to move on to the next stage.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.100.119.124 (talk) 11:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  First Person 3D Run and gun or Shoot 'em up
Talk:Ystradyfodwg

message: The Genuki page has a bit more information (some from out-of-copyright sources) that could be integrated here. Womble 04:00, 3 August 2005 (UTC)

message: The last incarnation of this article was extinguished with the statement "Ystradyfodwg is Rhondda".  Clearly this is not the case, as shown in the new article. . . .LinguisticDemographer 01:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: New article
Talk:List of Washington state parks

message: According to GNIS there are 169 parks in Washington state with "state park" in the name, and given the WA state parks website says there's only 120, it seems there's likely about 49 'former' state parks, although there may well be dupes, overlaps, name changes, other 'false positives', etc. I don't want to just dump them into the article as is, unfiltered, so I'll put the list in HTML in this subpage for people to work from. Shawisland (talk) 07:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List of parks for completeness

message: I'm wondering whether this state park may have been renamed to Kanaskat-Palmer State Park. At least there is no Hanging Gardens State Park at the official website. --X-Weinzar (talk) 23:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hanging Gardens State Park 

message: Columbia Park in Kennewick/Tri-Cities has never been park of the State Parks system.  Banks Lake's shoreline (not inclusive of Steamboat Rock) has from time to time been considered State Parks administered, but may have reverted to the Bureau of Reclamation.  The Bruceport County Park near Bay Center, Pacific County, may have at one time been the Bay Center State Park.  Several of the other San Juan Islands have come and gone from the State Parks system, formerly on Bureau of Land Management withdrawal; some of the ones on the current list are now part of the newly established Federal reserve there.  Both the English Camp and American Camp on San Juan Island were State Parks before condemnation by the Federal government for the National Park.  A large portion of Sacajawea State Park was lost to impound when the Columbia/Snake River dams were built.  Peace Arch was originally named for its donor, Sam Hill.  Status of the John R Jackson House and the Rothschild House is undetermined; neither appears on the current State Parks listing.  Dry Falls stood for many years as a park independent of Sun Lakes.  Source, offline historical documents in my possession; more to come!  Genehisthome (talk) 06:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parks To Research Further
Talk:Coffee & TV

message: I think it's a good idea that the music video article be merged into the main article.  Even though it is a great video, it hasn't generated as much legend as, say, Michael Jackson's Thriller to warrant a whole seperate article.  The current article has very little information and could probably be put in its own section: much longer synopses are found in the various Gorillaz single articles (eg Kids With Guns / El Mañana.  In summary, anything that has been mentioned in the music video article would be just as well off in a section here. Taylor 12:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Did anybody else notice that "Big Suzy" was played by Chloe Webb? ----DanTD (talk) 12:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big Suzy 
Talk:Deccan Chronicle

message: The previous "version" (before I edited it) of this article seemed to have been written a person who benefits monetarily from this newspaper because the article did not respect the neutrality law of the website. I would suggest that this article be kept under scrutiny.
:I believe that the article now contains facts alone without commentary so the advertisement tag can be removed. 
Abhishekmathur (talk) 02:11, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  neutrality disputed 

message: in 80's DC used to carry a full 2 pages of movie listsings in the 100 odd theatres in the city. gone are the theatres and DC also has changed. --Hydman 13:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nostalgia  

message: DC used to be anti TDP and pro congress. It seems to be more neutral now. also would like to elaborate on the spicy nature of the paper. Any one concurring with me??--Hydman 13:13, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: I'm surprised there was no mention in the article about the Deccan Chargers IPL franchise that The Deccan Chronicle owns! Especially because the IPL is already underway. I added my two cents about it. Cheers! Julyda4th (talk) 15:02, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the formatting for it to resemble other sectionsAbhishekmathur (talk) 01:44, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Deccan Chargers]] 

message: This article, now, is not like an advertisement and thus I have removed the advert template but citations are missing. Thus I have put the citations missing tag. --Srinivas G Phani 13:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations and references
Talk:Ruhrstahl X-4

message: http://www.geocities.com/Augusta/8172/panzerfaust12.htm seems to suggest it had a 2.5 kg warhead and weighed in total 9kg. Also it's extremely unlikely it had any kind of proximity fused warhead. Any objections to me fixing this ? 
Megapixie 04:57, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have corrected the entry Megapixie 04:13, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: X-7 data seems a little out of whack

message: If the 262 never fired trial missiles, how, exactly, did it "participate" in the test program...?  TREKphiler hit me ♠  21:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Don't shoot, I'm only the test pilot
Talk:Ordination (statistics)

message: I am not a statistician but come from a machine learning background, so I'm not quite sure about the definition of ordination.
Still I am pretty sure, that it is related to dimensionality_reduction and in particular the techniques listed in nonlinear_dimensionality_reduction.
So shouldn't it somehow link there?
Cheers T3kcit (talk) 09:19, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to Dimensionality reduction 

message: Same thing. Brycehughes (talk) 12:59, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Gradient analysis]]
Talk:Mad Hot Ballroom

message: 40 million dollar budget? seems quite high to me for a relatively small documentary - any further information on this, or a source?
Laguna72 05:11, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: :Image:274019.1020.A.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:45, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:274019.1020.A.jpg
Talk:Continuously variable transmission

message: New topics will go below this one. Cheers, 1292simon (talk) 03:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Placeholder section 

message: Hydrostatic drives are used on quite large earthmoving equipment , notably large bulldozers.  Here is an example of a 770HP drive https://www.mobilehydraulictips.com/fluid-power-drives-mega-dozer/ . The section should be reworded slightly to note that hydrostatic transmissions are very efficient at all power levels. Salbayeng (talk) 22:34, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hydrostatic drives are not just for small "lawn mower" applications 

message: In a hydrostatic system the fluid does not move, it is static = not move. All hydraulic power transmission systems rely on fluid movement and are therefore hydrodynamic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.225.0.161 (talk) 00:33, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yeah this is an annoying terminology thing that differentiates between transmissions using positive-displacement_pumps and rotodynamic pumps, the terminology is ingrained now but I'll add mention of the discrepancy to the section since it does seem a bit dumb otherwise. MasterTriangle12 (talk) 06:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone tell me why hydraulic systems are wrongly referred to as hydrostatic ? 

message: Should there be a section on Buick Twin Turbine (53-63) and Triple Turbine (57-59) transmissions ? These transmissions are often referred to as 2 (twin turbine) or 3 (triple turbine) speed automatics, but they were not actually shifting when in Drive, instead having a continuously varied overall reduction ratio resulting from the relative speeds of 2 or 3 turbines in the torque converter, each driving different inputs of an epicyclic geartrain.
In particular, the Triple Turbine variant and its close cousin at Chevrolet, the Turboglide, didn't even have a Low gear setting, and could offer reduction from 4.5-4.7:1 up to 1:1 seamlessly without shifting. They were hydraulic CVTs, but not of the "hydrostatic" nature. Clarrieu (talk) 10:04, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buick Twin and Triple Turbine Dynaflow
Talk:Sniper Advanced Targeting Pod

message: Pantera points here, but I don't see any clarification within the article.  192.91.171.42 (talk) 07:01, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pantera

message: This article states: "The Sniper ATP is in service with Norway, Oman, Poland, Singapore, Canada, Belgium, Turkey, Saudi Arabia[3] and the UK MoD." Wonder if the Americans use it too? Also, clearly some UK-phile has been editing this - "UK MoD" is listed as a user, why not just United Kingdom like all of the other countries listed? Haven't looked carefully to see if the article has been written in UK English, but that's probably next...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.243.164.201 (talk) 04:29, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S.? 
Talk:Thomas Parry (Chennai merchant)

message: Am I looking at a copy-vio? The content seems to have been directly lifted from http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/mp/2002/12/11/stories/2002121100070300.htm. --Madhu 16:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not too sure how to do that. Do I mark it as copy-vio or can I revert to a previous version? --Madhu 17:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Mrs Trellis, I just reverted to a previous 'clean' version. If this is incorrect, please feel free to handle this the way it should be done. --Madhu 17:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

text: That looks fine. Thanks for doing the work. Mrs Trellis 19:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy-vio?

message: Pargraphs forChildhood and Career need references
and this sentence makes nosense: "The Cemetry of Thomas Parry. esq at C.S.I Christ church (also called as missionary church) Cuddalore Port 
I assume you mean Thomas Parry esq is buried in the cemetery of C.S.I. Christ Church, also called Missionary Church) at Cuddalore Port, India. I checked the info with gooogle. I am correctand will edit that sentence, but it would be nice to have a reference. Perhaps his grave is listed on www.findagrave.comOldperson (talk) 21:32, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: suggestions
Talk:Worldvision Enterprises

message: Typo: BCI Eclispe ==> BCI Eclipse
Also removed Wikilink to a page that no longer exists.
Join Wikipedia Typo Team -- You Can Help! Aclayartist (talk) 17:02, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo Correction

message: Should we mention CBS Home Entertainment as a successor? Seeing as CBS now owns a majority of the Worldvision library. Matthew Cantrell (talk) 05:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just a thought
Talk:Man Plus

message: I just worked my butt off cleaning this up and wikifying; I think perhaps removing the cleanup tag is premature.  I tried really hard to get it more NPOV, but not being familiar with the novel really hurt me there.  As you can see, the CRITICISM section has been left blank; I'd like to get at it later, as it seems to be a much-written-about novel.  Please feel free to beat up on me if you feel I didn't do good-enough a job on this.  Mitchell k dwyer 05:49, 3 August 2005 (UTC)