lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Abraham Baldwin

message: Article taken from archives.gov.
:Generally, materials produced by Federal agencies are in the public domain and may be reproduced without permission. However, not all materials appearing on this website are in the public domain.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frank0051 (talk • contribs) 17:06, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: In his book THE COMPLETE BOOK OF U.S. PRESIDENTS-2001-William
DeGregario wrote that in notes only made public in 1987,Abraham Baldwin wrote that George Washington said privately that he did not expect the US Constitution to last more then 20 years.page 7-
On the basis of this information,this article should be expanded.Thanks-
Richard F. DungarLa Crosse,Wisconsin-
RFD 15:14, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abraham Baldwin 

message: There is not indication that the thespian family of Baldwins is descendent from Abraham Baldwin. The website referenced in the content that has been removed twice contains no family connection, but is rather a list of unconnected Baldwins since the 18th century. Holford (talk) 22:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have a citation, please list it. It is my understanding that The Baldwins are of Irish descendant. Frank0051 (talk) 17:00, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baldwin descendants 

message: Because of persistent vandalism from multiple unregistered or newly registered users, I think this article should be at least semi-protected. TK421bsod (talk) 16:20, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection against vandalism 

message: Ffftftftfttftftftftftftffffffffffffffffff  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:367B:6680:DE6:762E:C6B2:D1DC (talk) 13:36, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rrr
Talk:Little Whinging

message: I have only just realized, having listened to the Harry Potter audio book that it is pronounced "win-jing" not winging. I am going to play the Noramericano card here. I never heard the word spoken out loud before. 
*AHD|wĭnjĭng, IPA|/wɪnʤɪŋ/, SAMPA|/wIndZIN/
*AHD|hwĭnjĭng, IPA|/ʍɪnʤɪŋ/, SAMPA|/WIndZIN/
Group29 22:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: The descriptions are not necessarily essay-like, but they do lack a formal done and seem be meer judgements.  I do agree with these assessments of Little Whinging, and think they are what J.K. Rowling intended, but they are not befitting of an encyclopedia entry.
John Reaves 10:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style 

message: I seem to recall an article saying that the No.4 of the films is substancially different to the No.4 from the books, in design etc, because it wouldn't have looked right otherwise. Anyone have a text to hand to look at, cos I'm not certain of the details. Something like the books implying it was more like a post-war house, not a modern developer-house as pictured currently, is what I'm remembering. Graldensblud 01:15, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No.4 Privet Drive

message: When is it stated that he lives in Little Whinging?  I've removed it for now.
John Reaves 20:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What about boys of Dudley's age? Graldensblud 11:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Evans? 

message: I agree with the comment that was here that this could be combined into the dursleys article and a redirect put on it. As long as all the info can be transfered etc. There is not a lot there really is there and mostly just a description of the place. The book description would be best as you can see from the pic what the film version is like. Take the pic over to the dursley article to Delighted eyes 04:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Combining
Talk:Korybantes

message: Re: Gallae vs. Galli/Galloi - It should be (and was) the second one, since the priests of Cybele were (sort of) male.  As a side note, they don't particularly belong here.
:I believe most transsexuals would be rather offended at being called "sort of male" or "sort of female" rather than simply their proper gender. --Eequor 13:51, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Bacchiad. I didn't want to get embroiled with latter-day Greek nationalists. Wetman 15:59, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I know absolutely nothing about this period of classical history, but I wonder if, despite the similarities, they warrant two articles. They are distinguished in the 1911 Britannica articles Corybantes and Curetes, and Silverman finds a lot to say about both. I edited this article and the dab Curetes to better reflect the distinction. Or is the current intertwined nature of the descriptions good enough? Incidentally, Silverman's "...distinguished only by their Asiatic origin and by the more pronouncedly orgiastic nature of their rites" survives into the contemporary Britannica, which otherwise does indeed merge the two into one. David Brooks (talk) 17:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korybantes vs Kuretes
Talk:Nigerian Air Force

message: I have removed the NPOV template from the article as, at the time of writing, there are no comments on this talk page about what the neutrality problem might be.  Those who feel that there might or is a neutrality problem should feel free to put the template back, but please do comment on this talk page so that we can work to resolve any problems that might exist. Greenshed 00:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article probably suffers from non-NPOV as it appears to be a direct copy of the Nigerian Air Force website!. MilborneOne 22:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In which case it should be tagged as a copy vio. Greenshed 22:24, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: Under external links there are two puzzling links.
www.airforce.mil.ng is identified as "Official website" and www.nigerianairforce.net is identified as "Nigerian Air Force".
One website appears to be a clone of the other, and surely they cannot both be official websites. I think we should re-assess the labels we use for these websites, and whether it makes sense to link to both.    Djapa Owen (talk) 05:51, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official website vs Airforce.net 

message: If you edit this article please dont edit this article without using reliable references!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.52.144.222 (talk) 22:28, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality 

message: Is the machinery through the will of the state is formulated, expressed and realized 105.112.38.19 (talk) 22:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Government 

message: One fatal "error" happened in December 2023, when the Nigerian forces accidentally hit a village with an armed UAV in northwestern Nigeria killing a lot of people. this information was removed and I set it again. I correct the number of killed people with another serious source. Best --Schandona (talk) 10:00, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Information about fatal accident
Talk:Warrington

message: :A few years ago I helped compile the list of Notable People from Warrington. Reviewing it now, it seems really rather long for the main Warrington article. In other circumstances like this, there is a list separate from the main article with a link. I don't have the technical knowledge to compile a separate list. (1) Do others agree there should be separate list? If so, (2) can someone volunteer to do it?
:ArbieP (talk) 13:13, 17 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable People  

message: Should Lake County be added as a place formerly twinned with Warrington?Halbared (talk) 07:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formerly twinned 

message: A new page called Borough of Warrington has been created, it covers the civil parishes and the borough of Warrington. Not Warrington itself and all the borough is parished except Warrington itself. DragonofBatley (talk) 01:02, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Borough of Warrington]]
Talk:Allan Caidic

message: Hi,
This article cannot become a good article without first being nominated. Also this article is unlikely to pass nominations without proper references.
Cedars 03:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article status 
Talk:Amberg

message: The title LORD Mayor for a town of this size is completely inappropriate. See also . Does anyone know how to change the template to change Lord Mayor to something sensible like Town Mayor.
:The template takes the german title Oberbürgermeister and transforms it. So unless the source is faulty and the mayor of Amberg is not a Oberbürgermeister the infobox is correctly translated. Agathoclea 15:27, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Frank Sinatra

message: At over 16k words of readable prose, this article is too long to read comfortably. It would be beneficial to condense and/or migrate content to subarticles to make this one more readable. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:31, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I would also like to mention the sheer amount of references on this article. You know you’ve gone a bit overboard if an article about a person has the same amount of citations as the United States (609). Eticangaaa (talk) 18:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Length

message: This edit is specific, uncontroversial, and sensible. The beginning of this section starts with "at During the final years of his life,". 
The at should be removed. Hidude21 (talk) 23:29, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. It has been removed. --Onorem (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Death and funeral" section minor error 

message: Source : come fly with me 1998 digital remaster 92.1.76.106 (talk) 22:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How could he remaster a song in 1998 if he was in active in 1995
Talk:Edison, Georgia

message: Is this place named after Thomas Edison ? Jay 09:24, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks .  Jay (talk) 18:33, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Named after
Talk:52nd (Lowland) Infantry Division

message: An IP has now replaced properly sourced information on the size of the division (18,347 troops) with unsourced information three times (25,347 troops). The latter figure would make the division huge but if the IP has a source, please can they produce it. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 01:18, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Division size
Talk:Baron Foley

message: We have a problem of how to disambiguate the 1st two barons of each creation for this page.
The younger and the older seems to be the normal way.
Additionally, there is the problem of the first baron of Kidderminster, rather than the first Baron Foley of Kidderminster.
"The first baron by patent was John de Beauchamp of Holt, who was raised to the peerage by K. Richard II. in the eleventh year of his reign(Oct. 10, 1387) by the title of baron of Kidderminster." From A GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED IN HERALDRY by JAMES PARKER FIRST PUBLISHED in 1894 http://www.heraldsnet.org/saitou/parker/Jpglossb.htm#Badger
See also Biographia Britannica: Or, The Lives of the Most Eminent Persons ..., Volume 1 (1747) (Google Books)
GaryGMason (talk) 22:16, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ælfwine (Tolkien)

message: True, straight road didn't exist in BotL, but Ælfwine was present also in later (even post-LotR) writings, where the Straight Road did exist. Ausir 11:01, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Some database error, I believe, because it was stubbed in the beginning. Ausir 20:47, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: does this page need a character infobox? Nuidramdad (talk) 00:01, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: infobox?

message: Ælfwine is a common Old English name. This page should be move and made a dab. - Calgacus 21:06, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ælfwine

message: I wonder how Elfwine, the son of Éomer and Lothíriel fits into Tolkien's concept. The names are clearly related but I don't have any sources at hand to link the two. Anyone know this better? De728631 (talk) 20:49, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elfwine 

message: There may be evidence?!  The most generous interpretation I can give this is that it meant to say "there is ambiguous evidence which may imply...", in which case it would be good if someone could say what that evidence is.  Otherwise delete the passage. —Tamfang (talk) 08:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That is a very clumsy phrasing. It is clear from stuff in the two books on the post-LotR Silmarillion writings (Morgoth's Ring and The War of the Jewels) that Tolkien retained Ælfwine as translator and commenter. I have corrected the wording and added a specific citation to the article Troelsfo (talk) 10:21, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  speculation? 

message: , I have been advised that it is OK to start a "Merge" discussion after an AfD ends in "Keep". I have been advised that "Keep" includes "Merge". Merging was not raised at the AfD discussion and was not ruled out. I followed the instructions at WP:Merging and merged after one week as there was unanimous support. On what basis did you undo the merge?--Jack Upland (talk) 00:16, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Having received no response, and seeing as the existing situation duplicates the information, I will redo the Merge.--Jack Upland (talk) 17:50, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge undone
Talk:Meritage

message: Meritage can be used to describe wine made all over the world. 
:Not so. The Meritage Association will not license the name to non-American wineries. I know, we tried to so so a couple of years ago for a South African winery,
::Perhaps they have changed their rules, as The Meritage Association's member list currently shows one licensee of the trademark from Australia, three from Canada, and one from Israel. (I recently had a Canadian Meritage) Walter Moar 02:42, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Confirmed by writers from Wine Spectator magazine and a source at Rubicon Estate (Napa). Meritage Assoc. has broadened their licensing criteria in an effort to expand membership beyond the U.S. Heavypen (talk) 20:10, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: One thing that is not made clear by the article is why a name for Bordeaux-style wines is even needed, much less what is meant by a Bordeaux-style wine.
I don't have sources for this so I'm not going to put it in, but my understanding is that in order to name a wine a Merlot, a Cabernet Sauvignon or some other grape name, then at least 75% of the grapes in the wine must be of that kind.  So the problem is what to call wine blends (we need that article) that don't have 75% or more of any one kind of grape.  That's where Meritage comes in, at least for those wines that are blends of only the five classic Bordeaux grapes: Merlot, Cabernet Sauvignon, Cabernet Franc, Petit Verdot and Malbec.   It should be noted that if a wine blend has some non-Bordeaux grape in it, like Pinot Noir or Zinfandel, it is not a Meritage.  --Born2cycle (talk) 03:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the name is even needed 

message: I have removed the implication that "Summation" is synonymous with Meritage. It was inserted by an unregistered user on 10 August 2013 citing no supporting sources. I can find no mention of "Summation" on the Meritage Alliance site. "Summation" seems to be a rival brand for a somewhat different blend.
Frans Fowler (talk) 23:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not "Summation" 
Talk:New Party (Taiwan)

message: Was anyone here aware Instantnood is running another poll to move "XXX of Taiwan" to "XXX of the Republic of China" at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Chinese)/NPOV/Taiwan vs. ROC?  The poll "started" a week ago, but since no pages link to the polling page, I thought maybe it was a little onesided and needed some publicity...  SchmuckyTheCat 21:20, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Poll

message: Please do not make any unilateral moves before discussing on the talkpage. I believe there is a pre-established consensus on this article's name. There was a poll that showed only 29% support of the move to New Party (ROC).--Jerrch 20:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 
Talk:Feroze Gandhi

message: Please change the category :Category:People who died in office to :Category:Politicians who died in office. 2601:241:300:B610:1CDA:D4D5:97FE:FCE5 (talk) 22:31, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: . ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 00:37, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 February 2021 

message: Member of the Indian Parliament 49.37.42.37 (talk) 10:56, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. -ink&fables «talk» 18:07, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 September 2021 

message: 2402:8100:300E:595B:1:2:A99B:931A (talk) 07:42, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 2 June 2022 

message: Change: Feroze Gandhi (born Feroze Jehangir Gandhy Editor23451233 (talk) 11:43, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cannolis (talk) 12:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 February 2023 

message: The original name is Feroze Jehangir Ghandy even as per the same page, yet it is mispelt as Feroze Gandhi giving a wrong impression about the lineage.  All references to the name must be his full name Feroze Jehangir Ghandy or Feroze Ghandy instead of Feroze Gandhi OurTemples (talk) 12:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Not mispelled. Read the article - "Being inspired by Mahatma Gandhi, Feroze changed the spelling of his surname from "Ghandy" to "Gandhi" after joining the Independence movement." and read WP:COMMONNAME Cannolis (talk) 13:11, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 February 2023
Talk:Peer-to-peer

message: Please join the discussion here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Legal_aspects_of_file_sharing#The_European_Union_study David A (talk) 12:56, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  The European Union study 

message: This article does not describe any system of relevance in 2018. The term defined has not been adopted. It seems that this item does not deserve it's own page and maybe should just be put as a note in the p2p article itself. James Michael DuPont (talk) 15:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[CoopNet content distribution system]] 

message: In See also section a link to Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) is listed. I doubt this has any relevance to P2P page. Maybe a bot added it due to "chat". What do you think, should it be removed? The theory itself is not mentioned in other text at all.
Andreas66Depot (talk) 07:21, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) relevance 

message: The term 'Free-rider detection' is not defined or hyperlinked with a redirection to a definition  in any previous sections, nor in this section where it first appears. I suggest a redirection hyperlink be added. Perhaps: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_rider
    49.185.188.238 (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Free-rider detection' in 'current research' section
Talk:Polymath

message: At The Polymath#Summary, I've summarised a 2018 book which is apparently the first English-language book on the topic. Almost all of the summary could be posted in this article. I propose that we introduce it with "In his 2018 book The Polymath, British author Waqas Ahmed defines polymaths as those who..." and then the rest of the second paragraph and the rest of the Summary section, excluding the little paragraph at the end ("Throughout the book..."). Ahmed has posts at the Open University and the London Interdisciplinary School so counts as an academic, so this could be a subsection of the "In academia" section of the article, but where it goes is not so important. Because I wrote the article about the book on paid time, I have a COI so I would be grateful if someone would implement this change or give me permission to do so. MartinPoulter (talk) 15:24, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format.  PK650 (talk) 11:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Apologies. In the "In academia" section of this article, introduce a subsection heading "Waqas Ahmed". As the text for that subsection, take the "Summary" section of the article The Polymath, exclude the first and last paragraphs, and add the clause "In his 2018 book The Polymath, British author Waqas Ahmed defines polymaths as those who..." right at the start to introduce the section. Is this clear enough? MartinPoulter (talk) 15:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done  PK650 (talk) 09:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Block of text to add 

message: I recall finding Hypatia through this article, but mention of her - or of any woman - seems to have been removed. Ressomatic (talk) 14:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Flicking through The Polymath, I find Maya Angelou (page 1), Florence Nightingale, Maria Gaetana Agnesi, Émilie du Châtelet, Ban Zhao, Lubna of Córdoba and Anna Maria van Schurman (page 18), Mary Somerville (page 71), George Eliot and Stéphanie Félicité, comtesse de Genlis (page 291). Hypatia's on page 57. Why on Earth is this article including male-only lists? MartinPoulter (talk) 16:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hypatia 

message: Could someone please add to this section the names of any  of the women that fit the description of polymath? It seems a previous reply to this thread offered up quite a few candidates. I’m also interested in the official criteria that’s required for a person’s name to officially qualify for such a title as polymath. Could anyone enlighten me? 2600:6C55:4600:1D39:4830:1A64:3D58:4DDC (talk) 12:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need a trained eye to take a look.
Talk:Citizen Lab

message: Lado 123.253.123.20 (talk) 18:59, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haking 

message: Wondering if anyone else thinks the article, which has undergone significant edits is ready to remove the rewrite template. 
Also, is the funding section particularly notable? No secondary sources so far Superb Owl (talk) 01:58, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove 'rewrite' template and delete funding section?
Talk:Osric of Deira

message: Says here Osric was killed by agents of Cadwallon, but although I can't find any sources that state the manner of his death one way or another, it makes a lot of sense to me that he would have been killed during the disaster at York. Stenton says this, which seems to suggest I am correct:
"Osric...maintained himself as king in Deira until...Cadwallon destroyed him and his army."
Does anyone know better than I do? Everyking 19:27, 20 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled