lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Rats in the Walls

message: I remember a line in which Delapore mentions fungus creatures. Is he referencing the Mi Go?
:It's actually "fungous", meaning flabby or grossly fat, referring to the semi-ape things that the de la Poers eat.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.209.7 (talk) 22:39, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mi Go 

message: "maintained an underground city for centuries ". Now come on guys! Iirc, Lovecraft describes that when the party reached the older parts of the caverns, they found the older sceleton types. I have never interpreted this story in any other meaning than that the village is as old as mankind, i.e. possibly a hundred thousend years, and was maintained for this period as a "reference catalog" of our ancestors. This is what to me makes up the real horror of this story. The age of this all. Thyl Engelhardt  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.70.217.172 (talk) 11:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's Lovecraft's usual fear of human regression, as per Pickman's Model. The "human cattle" are supposed to be regressed people, not protohumans. That's why Lovecraft explicitly says they're "in every case definitely human." It's implied the bones in one of the prehistoric tumuli are pre-human, but there are less developed skeletons at the top of the stairs than at the bottom, so that doesn't pan out very well. Mostly likely it's just that tomb is so old everyone was pre-human at the time. It's not a reference catalog, it's that every generation has been dragging people down here to breed for meat for thousands of years. Which is much worse. Herr Gruber (talk) 11:43, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, interesting, will have to read thy story again. Thyl Engelhardt. 213.70.217.172 (talk) 08:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of underground village 

message: Actually, it's not E(dgar) A(llan) POE, it's ED(gar) AL(lan) POE. The first two letters in first and middle names are present, just reversed. I'd edit that into the article, but I'm not sure if I'm explaining it clearly enough even now. 74.243.20.102 (talk) 03:16, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  De La Poer 

message: What I'm missing in the Inspirations section are some references about the historic Roman Mater Deum Magna Ideae/Kybele/Attis cult. I don't know what was known about it in Lovecraft's time, but the ruins of a Mater Magna and Isis temple recently excavated in Mainz, Germany, revealed some interesting things, including large pits for sacrificial blood, lead plates with courses against other people carved into them and some kind of "vodoo" dolls with nails in them.
The German article for that site is here: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heiligtum_der_Isis_und_Mater_Magna_(Mainz)
-- 188.195.195.198 (talk) 22:16, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magna Mater 

message: You should Google it 37.25.86.85 (talk) 09:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  He has a cute cat
Talk:Medieval fortification

message: While it is surprising that there needed to be church councils as late as the early 1100s,
:Manpower in the Medieval era in traditional governments in Europe consisted mainly of slave
labor and low-class laborers.''
still strikes me as uninformed. Considering castellation didn't pick up until after the Norman conquest of England, it seems entirely specious to argue that the manpower (in the army or construction trade) was mainly (even commonly) slave labor, as distinct from the serfs and villeins. -LlywelynII (talk) 09:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Church councils? Adam Bishop (talk) 12:20, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Slave Labor

message: Hello all,
I've reverted a couple edits with Rollback.
The edits were unexplained removed content and have been undone.
FockeWulf FW 190 (talk) 17:42, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  edits reverted 

message: This article is all over the place. The usual way that medieval fortifications are described is to start with the earliest ones and work forwards in time. This is because there was an arms race between the architects of fortification and the engineers who had to overcome them. Placing the fortifications in chronological order helps to explain why as well as when developments took place.
For example the early stone castles of northern France and England were a replacement for Motte-and-bailey castles of which Rochester Castle is a good example.
It was realised that having a very strong keep as a citadel, while allowing the gates to be a week point was not the most practical design and over time the major fortifications moved from the keep to the gatehouse. For example at Warwick Castle the original keep was abandoned and a strong gatehouse was built.
During the same period it was realised that the corners of towers were vulnerable to attack so round towers became popular as did an outer but weaker defensive wall. The result were castles like Beaumaris. 
Of course Beaumaris was built from scratch in a marsh. Other factors such as continuous upgrading of fortifications as happened at the Tower of London or Dover Castle means that castles could end up with many features from different times.
Also the terrain plays an important part in castle design. Edward I placed most of his castles in Wales close to the sea so that if they were besieged by the Welsh then supplies and reinforcements could be sent by sea. Designs of castles like Edinburgh Castle is obviously in part dictated by the terrain in developing a strong geographical defensive point at a strategic location. However in some cases this lead to a specific category of caste defences such as the German Schildmauer or castle shield wall.
This is a sketch of how this article could be restructured to make it more useful to readers who have little knowledge of castles because at the moment this article is of little help.
-- PBS (talk) 13:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chronological mess
Talk:Leakage

message: Since all statements of the "intro" bullets have elaborations in sections below, I suggest removing the first section and absorb the statements in the bullets by the paragraphs below. --Deryck C. 04:51, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that the bullet points should be removed except for quantum mechanics and medicine, as they don't have their own sections. Perhaps a final section should be created for those, like "other uses". --AbsolutDan (talk) 13:43, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Then I think I'll do it once I have time. --Deryck C. 13:54, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Remove the intro section?

message: This article is composed of about six topics that seem to have almost nothing to do with each other, beyond using the word 'leakage'.  I wonder if the concept of leakage, as an 'unwanted loss of something', is simply too broad to merit an article of its own, and the component topics should be broken up into their own articles; 'leakage current', leakage (economics), etc. or redirected elsewhere?  Comments? --ChetvornoTALK 07:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I had had the same thoughts when I updated the semiconductor leakage section Philhower (talk) 19:14, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Barring strenuous objections I am going to break this article up, mostly redirecting terms like retail leakage, income leakage, and audio leakage to appropriate existing articles. --ChetvornoTALK 01:49, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken care of it for you. Wizard191 (talk) 01:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this article be broken up?
Talk:Plançon à picot

message: Another slightly dodgy mediaeval weaponry article possibly inspired by RPGs. I was slightly skeptical that "plançon a picot" is an actual weapon name (it is just French for "spiked plank") but on Googling, after wading through a lot of irrelevant rubbish I do find this  which says (in French) that there is little certainty what was meant by the mediaeval phrase, but it probably refers to an awl pike! And then this page  says (also in French) that it was used by the Flemish from the 13th to 15th century and is "little known" but was some sort of pike. So our article seems completely wrong. -- Securiger 13:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:We Are Family: Now Get Me Some Water!

message: it says on the top that this is a scheduled program, but it has already come out! can someone remove that? thanx
70.170.93.169 04:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed that for you, next time you may like to Be bold!.--Commander Keane 05:35, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sheduling 

message: The individual episode articles for this series are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines.  Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:List of Hannah Montana episodes#2nd episode article review. Thanks. -- Ned Scott 05:40, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode article review notice
Talk:Rahovec

message: @Durraz0 Etymology is the study of word's origin and meaning. The origin and meaning of the word is Serbian, and is supposed be explained first. Later-developed variants goes more in depth later on. That is how an article is supposed to be composed. The title of the article has no purpose in this section of etymology.  --Azor (talk). 13:22, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It makes more sense to have the current name followed by its root, this is how the other articles on wiki do it, see for example Niš or Berat, there we have the name followed by its original stem from another language. Durraz0 (talk) 13:32, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Durraz0 What gives sense to you is off topic. Etymology is the study of origins, in which the origin is first presented and then preceded to present the later-developed variants. That's how all Etymology section is composed. Both of the cities you mentioned start with the original etymology of the names, so I do not see your point. While the current name of the city is irrelevant to the Etymology section, Orahovac is co-official and can also be considered the city's name.  --Azor (talk). 13:38, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, etymology is the study of origins, the origins of Rahovec is from Orahovac. the name of the article is Rahovec, therefor it follows that it is first explained where Rahovec comes from. The way you wrote it now makes it seem like the name of the article itself is Orahovac. Durraz0 (talk) 13:46, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: As I have said, the name of the article has no role in the etymology section. Rahovec is of Serbian origin, just like Orahovac. Despite Orahovac also being the city's name, I decided to change the sentence up, take a look. --Azor (talk). 13:51, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Rahovec is indeed the Albanized version of the Serbian name Orahovac. The name of the article has a role in the etymology section, because that is what we are trying to explain/find the origin of. I really appreciate that you want to reach a consensus here. friendly reminder you accidentally removed the source in this edit . Durraz0 (talk) 14:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes my mistake, cheers. --Azor (talk). 14:11, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Sacrament (novel)

message: Shouldn't this be at Sacrament (novel)? (Emperor 04:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it should, done :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 10:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: Has anyone thought of writing a synopsis for this book?  I mean, someone out there must have read it and could toss one off?  Or maybe I'll read it and do one myself! 
KProvance (talk) 03:47, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Synopsis?
Talk:Pepper Hamilton

message: fixed a typo in the references Pressace (talk) 14:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: While both are true, the latter is the more important. As such I have removed it for being such a notorious copyright violation. In the future, when you see such an unambiguous copy-and-paste from a site such as that, have no hesitation about removing it. 68.39.174.238 12:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:WPRS-FM

message: Generally, one license merits one Wikipedia article—and this is one license. This should be easy. Raymie (t • c) 18:38, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Making note of 's Oppose vote at Talk:WWZZ. Raymie (t • c) 23:20, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I was unaware you had created the !vote section here. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 02:38 on January 14, 2020 (UTC)
*Support: There is no reason why WWZZ needs a separate article from WPRS-FM; a good chunk of the content is in both articles anyway. (I don't really see enough of a "tangle" with WWVZ's own history to derail a merger; the only pre-simulcast portion of 103.9's history mentioned in the WWZZ article was that it used to be a different "Z104", WZYQ-FM — but again, that tidbit, as well as the simulcast actually starting in the final years of "Xtra 104" and carrying over to "Z104", is already in both articles. Indeed, unlike the WPRS-FM page, the WWZZ page doesn't even mention 103.9's current WTLP incarnation at all…) Most of the content that is in WWZZ but not already in WPRS-FM probably doesn't need to be moved over, for various reasons (including, but not necessarily limited too, lack of sources). --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:09, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 10:28, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal of [[WWZZ]] into [[WPRS-FM]]
Talk:Albert Widdowson

message: I have removed the concern of notability. This guy was as professional a professional sportsman as you got back in the early 1890s - indeed, from what I gather, he was paid for his appearance and received something of an offer of a "contract", per se, at the time. I have checked for biographies on every player who represented the Derbyshire first team since 1957 at the very least, and am going back through the history of the team - albeit inbetween other things. Bobo. 05:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:University of Louisiana

message: This page is more a disambiguation, than an article. It is important because before I started this page, several articles would link to University of Louisiana without specifying which one. There is the historical namesake that became Tulane; two state universities so-named since the late 1990s; and at least two fictional ones that have been used in cinema. Aaron charles 05:28, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There seems to be an error on this page.  It lists Louisiana State University as one of the members of the University of Louisiana system.  But lists of the members of the University of Louisiana System elsewhere do not include LSU as a member.
I think there are two distinct groups of universities.  One is the list of campuses of the University of Louisiana, and the other is a list of the campuses of Louisiana State University.  I believe that are mutually exclusive lists.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JGDove99 (talk • contribs) 16:21, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Error
Talk:Rasul Mir

message: Hi wikipideans!
I have add some templates for Rasul Mir Shahabadi. The main source of information added on this page is from the monograph on Rasul Mir by prof. G.R Malik. The book is published by Sahitya Akademi in 1990. I have recently moved to Wikipedia editing and am still learning. As you may find it well on some of my edits. In a humble supplication, I urge Wikipedia Project to help this page provide more means of comprehensive information.
Regards Musadiq Mushtaq (talk) 06:10, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Added
Talk:Webster Hall

message: what about the albums that they produced like The Tranzworld series?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Codebreak (talk • contribs) 14:56, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the Webster hall albums 
Talk:Cuff title

message: :"http://www.kaisersbunker.com/gibraltar/"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.61.230.190 (talk) 10:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ernst Jünger]]'s Hannoverian Regiment in WW1: ''Gibraltar'' 

message: Article uncited since 2015. I'm unable to locate sources that discuss the topic directly and in detail, hence the redirect. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Some sources named the cuff title as:
* Armband 
* cuff band / cuffband
* cuff title / cufftitle
that may corresponding to the german Ärmelband / Ärmelstreifen, which describes the same, but meaning two different markings, but in the sources there mixed together. -- Gunnar 💬 (talk) 04:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of alternate names 

message: In the article Feudalism there is an illuminated image posted 
In this image, to the left on the king's right arm there is a large white sleeve. The king's right hand servant is also wearing a white sleeve. The king's sleeve appears to be tasseled or knotted while his servant's appears plain. 
Consider this as evidence that the Cuff title ornament is far older.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CautiousCapybara (talk • contribs) 14:05, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible older origin prior to King George III
Talk:Infantry Regiment Großdeutschland

message: How about the roles of Otto Ernst Remer in the July 20 plot?-- Matthead discuß!     O       19:42, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Otto Ernst Remer and July 20 plot 

message: Hi, I would like to reword this paragraph, to clarify that the reference/source describes the events in Pancevo. Right now the paragraph is structured in such a way that the ref seems to support the statement that "...film of the executions were used decades after the event to help chronicle the Wehrmacht's complicity..."
:Original:
:On 22 April 1941, soldiers of the Infantry Regiment Grossdeutschland committed a war crime in the town cemetery of Pančevo when 35 men and one woman were executed as a reprisal for the deaths of four German soldiers. Propaganda photos and film of the executions were used decades after the event to help chronicle the Wehrmacht's complicity in German atrocities during the war.[1]
:Suggested:
:On 22 April 1941, soldiers of the Infantry Regiment Grossdeutschland committed a war crime in the town cemetery of Pančevo when 35 men and one woman were executed as a reprisal for the deaths of four German soldiers.[1]
This is clearer. 
Thoughts? K.e.coffman (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pancevo 

message: Preserving here by providing this link. My rationale was: "non RS & not used for citations; excessive and uncited orbat; excessive intricate detail". Please let me know if there are any concerns. --K.e.coffman (talk) 00:41, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit
Talk:SS-Verfügungstruppe

message: 1. Verfugungstruppe does not mean "special purpose troops." (that would be  Sonderzwecktruppe or Sondernutzungstruppe). Verfugung doesn't translate well into English, but it has the general sense of 'command, control, disposal.'  "At your disposal" is zu Ihrer Verfugung; an court's injunction is a Verfugung. If a native German speaker can improve on 'dispositional troops,' please do; but don't bring back an erroneous translation.
2.  The Leibstandarte's formal name was Leibstandarte SS Adolf Hitler, abbreviated LSSAH.  So you will find it in every source: SS-LAH is just wrong.
3.  The tripartite division of the SS was already in place by mid-'37.
4. The Totenkopf formations were never part of the SS-VT.  They belonged to the Totenkopfverbande, a coequal branch of the SS, and Eicke was not about to turn over his private army to Hausser, whom he outranked. The TK-Div was only transferred to the Waffen-SS in Jan '41.
5. 3rd SS Rgt Der Fuhrer did not participate in the invasion of Poland; having been recruited in Austria after the Anschluss it wasn't ready. Although it appears on the AG Sud OOB, I assure you DF spent the fall of '39 as the Protector of Bohemia's garrison in Prague. Solicitr (talk) 04:13, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: :We already went through this discussion on the Waffen SS talk page. Since it has come up again on this article page I am copy-editing it over to here. 
:The Biblio/References section contains the following entry: 
:Flaherty, T.H (2004). The Third Reich:The SS (1st Edition ed.). Caxton Publishing Group. .
:The Caxton Publishing Group website shows no evidence of TH Flaherty or his book. Neither Google Books nor Amazon.com list the it. A Library of Congress (which, by law, should list every book published in the USA) search returns 'Invalid ISBN'.
:This reference underpins...the article. Unless someone demonstrates the book is real and credible, and corrects the reference with a valid ISBN, I will procede with deletion.Dduff442 (talk) 06:51, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it via ISBN link on wiki. Publisher is Time Life Books, not Caxton, and title is wrong. This is a spectacularly obscure title, from a non-academic source. Better sources than this are needed.Dduff442 (talk) 06:58, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the correct book cite, Dduff442. I corrected it in the reference section. This book was number one in a series on the Third Reich first published by the editors of Time-Life books in 1988. I read this book years ago and it is not a bad source; a good introduction type book. However, articles like this can always use more detail and better sourcing. Kierzek (talk) 01:42, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious TH Flaherty Ref

message: THE SS VERFUGUNGSTRUPPE WAS DIRECTLY SUBORDINATE TO THE NSDAP OR IN OTHER 
WORDS HITLERS PERSONAL PRAETORIAN GUARD AND THAT THE DEFINITION SHOULD
INCLUDE POLITICAL TROOPS TO THE SPECIAL PURPOSE OR AT YOUR DISPOSAL NOTES
ALREADY MENTIONED>  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.108.164.2 (talk) 19:30, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  According to OTTO WEIDINGER who was a DAS REICH MEMBER
Talk:Bethungra Spiral

message: Should this be here too, ? Same time frame ? Dave Rave (talk) 04:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frampton deviation 

message: Hi there, is there any reason why you didn't enter heritage information and content from the Google drive in the infobox, and other content in the article? Cheers. Rangasyd (talk) 09:32, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what you mean about the other content - there was no history and such a poor description that it wasn't really useful on top of what was already there. I left the infobox because I'm not great at messing with unfamiliar infoboxes, so when I merge that generally isn't included - not that there really was anything to include in this case anyway (besides stuff like the heritage designations which I'm particularly hopeless with). The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:56, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heritage listing in infobox
Talk:Helsinki University Central Hospital

message: We need help. How can Get a CEO? 196.191.248.125 (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selamu E 

message: I am from Ethiopia, one of African country, sub sahran area. Currently we are in a big problem. As result of war in the country hospitals are in lack of medications. People are dieing here and there. At minimum we cannnot get antipain. Please, help us we have no where to go. 196.191.248.125 (talk) 18:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Selam E
Talk:Porch collapse

message: I am dubious about this article as there are no references or even sources citied and so I am putting this up for deletion.
16:23, 23 January 2007 
What is this article even about? Whoever wrote this is a real tube. 
:Please observe WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA and avoid namecalling. Edison 22:06, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled