Talk:Omar Abdullah

message: Pls do not keep adding point of views to the page. Pls discuss on the discussion page before adding non verifiable information. Lost 01:35, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: All I am saying is that wikipedia needs sources to cite whatever you are citing. If you can cite sources for your additions, its ok. Else the comments will be reverted again. -- Lost 17:39, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, to improve the quality of the stub, such trivial info can be taken out. However, comments added by you, such as:
*Many see his take over of the NC party leadership as a non-democratic carry-over of an autocratic system
*His nomination as the new president of the NC party saw many resignations from senior party leaders
*As a sign of the discontent with the Abdullah Familie's monopoly on the party
*remains active, although shunned by the local populace
need citations from good sources, else they will be considered points of view. -- Lost 17:50, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP 70.78.86.89 

message: I will shortly be rewriting the entire article as per MoS:BIO. Please feel free to add your valuable inputs. -- Lost 19:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 18:58, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Today, I have come across vandalism at Omar Abdullah page from Last edit to Last edit after Vandalism by 91.72.158.111 Changing all Jammu and Kashmir wiki links to Indian administered Kashmir etc, which is blatant vandalism --Ekabhishek (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Pro-pakistani Vandalism on [[Omar Abdullah]] article

message: Democratically elected Chief Minster cannot be called a puppet. The shopian case was finally proved to be a fraud.Lacks neutrality to say the least
Gs44631 (talk) 07:08, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Omar abdullah and wife separated? the 'early life and eduction' section has a reference [13] but there is no mention of this on the reference link itself.--Anmolsharma.141 (talk) 23:13, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the Greater Kashmir sources as its biased non reliable self published source. Also one fact was solely supported by it, so I have removed it too. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 09:24, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greater Kashmir 

message: I've removed the a large part of the section because of the following reasons:
*The text contains the events that have happened in Kashmir during Mr Omar's office, this is not criticism. It is news and therefore still does not belong in wikipedia (see WP:NOTNEWSPAPER)
*A lot of text criticizes the Central Reserve Police Force not Mr Omar, and there is no reference that Mr Omar had initiated the actions of the Central Reserve Police Force.
*The text contained further information about the 2009 Shopian rape and murder case which did not have any significance to the criticism of Omar Abdullah, that text should be included in the article 2009 Shopian rape and murder case not here.
--Farah DesaiTalk 15:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Omar Abdullah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080612062705/http://164.100.24.209/newls/homepage.aspx?mpsno=2 to http://164.100.24.209/newls/homepage.aspx?mpsno=2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:50, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
* 
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:37, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion