lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of fluid mechanics journals

message: * The individual journal articles are stub/linkless and should not be expanded. 
* A list of different journals will be more useful. A brief description on the contents on of the journals and and external link to the journal page would suffice in most cases.
Ideally, I would prefer to delete the page as per what wikipedia is not guidlines. myth 13:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger of journals articles

message: There is an RfC regarding the standardization of journal lists names. Please comment at Talk:List of journals#RFC. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:37, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Talk:Lists of journals#RFC|RfC on journal list names]]
Talk:Blossfeldia liliputana

message: "Lilliput" has a double "ll". Why doesn't the plant? Google also seems to think that it's liliputana. jimfbleak 13:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hard to know. You'd need to ask Werdermann (the person who described the species), and he's dead now. - MPF 14:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

text: The German spelling is Liliput, see German wikipedia, and the code of nomenclature states that the original spelling of a species name should not be changed except in some exceptional circumstances that concern the Latin terminations. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 13:34, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: Blossfeldia is a monotypic genus, so there should be one article at the genus name, as per WP:MONOTYPICFLORA. I've now merged the relevant material there. Peter coxhead (talk) 13:50, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Halorhodopsin

message: — Assignment last updated by Electriceel25 (talk) 19:06, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENGW3307 Adv Writing for the Sciences

message: These are the edits I plan to make to the Halorhodopsin Wikipedia page in the near future:
* Add categories/sections and organize current information into new sections
** Etymology
** Structure
** History
* Expand "As a research tool" section (possibly rename the section "Applications"?)
** Include current use of halorhodopsins in optogenetics
* Add missing link for "light-gated ion pump"
* Add image of halorhodopsin structure from Wikimedia commons
* Add 'See Also' section for links to other rhodopsin Wikipedia pages and Optogenetics Wikipedia page
* Add a taxbox (similar to one on Proteorhodopsin Wikpedia page)
Electriceel25 (talk) 16:11, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing plans
Talk:Heinrich Daniel Ruhmkorff

message: I made a small clarification link to make sure that everyone knows that Bramah company was Joseph Bramah and not anything to do with Ernest Bramah Smith, Pernambuco 14:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The statement that a red Ruhmkorff lamp excited green fluorescence from a uranium salt is dubious. Except in special cases, fluorescence can only be excited in a lower colour, i.e a longer wavelength, a lower energy than the exciting radiation. Exciting a higher energy state requires high-intensity radiation, which it is doubtful the Ruhmkorff lamp produced. The reference cited is quite explicit, but I wonder if it is accurate? Perhaps the white CO2 Geissler was used?  --D Anthony Patriarche (talk) 02:16, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: See answer at Talk:Gas-discharge lamp#Doubts about claimed fluorescence in Ruhmkorff lamps. Zaereth (talk) 22:33, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruhmkorff Lamp fluorescence
Talk:List of Catholic dioceses in the Philippines

message: Where's Aurora included? --Howard the Duck 14:06, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Page under massive reformatting. Please be patient.Benkenobi18 (talk) 19:47, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Chinese-Filipino Catholic Apostolate in the Philippines is missing in this list. Maybe someone can include it. Sanglahi86 (talk) 17:28, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese-Filipino Catholic Apostolate in the Philippines
Talk:Fimbles

message: I have seen that there is no image to this article. Anyone care to upload one?
: Someone did, but I beleve the picture has been deleted, i am about to sort it out.  Tiddly Tom  19:54, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: So we have announced that the Fimbles will revamp as a new 25 minute length series in 2014, and be a hybird educational/interactive/preschool show and will combine the elements and the characters of Tikkabilla, Fimbles, The Roly Mo Show, Get Squiggling, The Shiny Show, and ZingZillas together, it will be filmed at outside Nancy Smith's house and it will be BBC Arkansas' first produced show under Novel Entertainment, and we will begin production of the new Fimbles series by the end of late-March 2014.
Thanks Kaylor.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.35.212.107 (talk) 08:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Fimbles series to be announced for late-2014
Talk:Semisimple module

message: the statement: "One should beware that despite the terminology, not all simple rings are semisimple." is really confusing. Isn't a simple ring by definition the sum of simple submodules?
* No, a simple ring R is a ring where the only 2-sided ideals are 0 and R. See Simple_ring 64.5.88.115 02:00, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simple ring versus semisimple ring
Template talk:Tupolev aircraft

message: The Bear was both Tu-95 and Tu-142 (depending upon role.) —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 15:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I added it.  -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bear
Talk:Cheapflights

message: - Removed an external link to a flights website with no connection to cheapflights. (User:Cyberumbra)
does Cheapflights belong to Orbitz now?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.63.17.237 (talk) 08:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Now people can find cheap and best flights tickets easily all over the world on a single website known as Snorita this website search cheap flights for you from flights data of all other website available on internet. I highly recommend this website for people who travel mostly. Stoic0808 (talk) 09:28, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheap Flight Tickets
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Perth/Shopping Centres

message: *Centrepoint? SatuSuro 14:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Midland

message: * Arcades - Trinity, Carillion, Plaza, Picadilly, London Court for a start - there were more in the past - need to jog the old info sources SatuSuro 14:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: CBD

message: Added. —Moondyne 09:50, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[London Court]]
Wikipedia talk:Milestone articles

message: It would be nice to add in the 100th and 1000th featured article to this cat. Does anyone know what these are. GameKeeper 14:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about 1st article on Wikipedia?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.172.220.186 (talk) 02:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

message: 2,000,000th article was created 9 September 2007.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by C-randles (talk • contribs) 22:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date created 

message: We are approaching the 2,500,000 mark. As I write, there are 2,496,996 articles. Keep your eyes peeled! − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 14:08, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What was the 2.5M article? Nadando (talk) 23:47, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Joe Connor. I've added it to this category, and made some minor fixes to the format of the page. UltraExactZZ  Claims ~ Evidence  13:46, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Approaching 2.5 million 

message: So, what was the article 3500000?--Avala (talk) 14:04, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, what was it? I don't know. Lanthanum-138 (talk) 05:03, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  3.5 million 

message: Does anybody know when significant sections of Wikipedia, such as Wikipedia: Village pump or Wikipedia: Articles for deletion were first set up? If so, it would make sense to have the year in which they were set up in one of Wikipedia: Milestones pages. Vorbee (talk) 15:20, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Significant components of Wikipedia

message: Wikipedia hit 6,000,000 English articles today, January 23, 2020. Anyone know the milestone article? Anyone know the 3,500,000 article? Is missing in milestones table. Thanks and have a good day.2601:581:8000:BDC0:404D:B77A:D56F:92BF (talk) 22:35, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia hits 6,000,000 articles, enter in chart 

message: Does anyone know what the 6.5 millionth article was? I wanna add it to the table. Americanfreedom (talk) 00:43, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: 6.5 Million
Talk:History Workshop Journal

message: Historiography is NOT history from below as is stated in the article. Historiography refers to the history of recording history, where as history from below is the study of history from the common persons perspective. I would edit to fix this article but I know not which the history workshop is supposed to focus on.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.123.191.246 (talk) 21:48, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I've fixed the formatting problem. This is a good start. Problems I can see are:
*the image is copyright - lots of solutions - the one Id like to think about is to freely license the journal front page if its it in your power
*some of it reads like a web site and not an encyclopedia article
*you don't reallt need to say "Blah says blah di blah". If the stuff is referenced then then can see who said it. it miht be appropropriate where the TES puts you in the top 43 journals
*I suspect you have a close association with this journal. THats not unusual but do make sure that you say so on your user page etc and don't say anything that might sound like promotion.
Hope that helps Victuallers (talk) 18:58, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Fixed?
Talk:Poor Cinderella

message: Not sure who felt compelled to make the changes, but Betty Boop cartoons were NEVER produced or distributed by MGM.  Betty was produced by Fleischer Studio, distributed by Paramount.  Whoever made the changes--please check your sources before editing.Konczewski 14:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fleischer/Paramount, not MGM
Category talk:Districts of Giresun Province

message: Somebody needs to go through all the articles using this template and fix the missorting created by this template automatically adding this category to articles without including the proper indexing sort key.
This insidious problem is especially bad because the category doesn't get listed in the article which gets placed in the category, so most Wikipedia editors won't have a clue as to how to fix an individual article, even if they do notice that it is missorted.  Therefore, it is the primary responsibility of the creators and users of this template to clean up after themselves.
Of course, the problem can also be solved by removing the addition of the category from this template.  I'll do that, if nobody cares enough to fix it.  Gene Nygaard 14:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fix the mess left behind after [[:Template:Districts of Giresun]]
Talk:Rio Grande Gorge Bridge

message: Not a cantilever truss bridge. It is a steel arch bridge.
Cantilever bridges have large superstructures up above the roadway, but arch bridges do not have to (though they can). See the New River Gorge Bridge for another steel arch bridge.
For a cantilever bridge, see the one across the St. Lawrence River in Montreal, Quebec.98.67.96.230 (talk) 17:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cantilever truss bridge - No 

message: For some reason I just can't fix it and edit here properly. The first problem is the broken link to bridges by height in the U.S., and the second is a link that's not in the right place. Thanks, Shalom11111 (talk) 02:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Bridges by height in the U.S works fine for me (Mac/Firefox). Which link is misplaced? --Pete Tillman (talk) 15:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting, that's weird. I see it as tenth highest bridge in the United States, but in the way you see it when you edit the page, for some reason it works alright here.. (and I view this on my chormebook and iphone). And in the Awards section there's a badly placed link that says: "... See: http://www.aisc.org/contentNSBA.aspx?id=21368". Shalom11111 (talk) 02:32, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Think I got them all fixed now.... --Pete Tillman (talk) 03:46, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright. What seemed to fix it was the replacement of the word "tenth" by "seventh". Well that's odd. Shalom11111 (talk) 00:26, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It was actually some stray wikicode -- but now the 7tn is wrong, since we're accepting the lower 172-m height. I'll fix later, Pete Tillman (talk) 23:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article has issues, please take a minute to fix this 

message: We presently give an unsourced height of 660 ft., but Highest Bridges gives a height of 565 ft, which is stated by the author to be his laser-rangefinder measurement. That author writes "Most sources have it between 600 feet (183 mtrs) and 700 feet (213 mtrs) high when the true height is 565 feet (172 mtrs) from road deck level to the normal surface level of the river." I couldn't find  an official height  figure and am inclined to go with the 565 ft measurement, cited as noted. Comments? --Pete Tillman (talk) 04:27, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, I just checked what you said. The article actually does give this source, which states the height is 565 ft (172 m) too, so I agree that we should go with that one. Ironically enough, I was there a week ago and estimated the bridge's height at no more than 170m, when I saw here to my surprise that I was wrong. The variety in measurements from different sources might be due to the constant change in the water surface level.. Anyway I'm fixing it now. Shalom11111 (talk) 00:20, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height of the bridge?
Talk:Inner Harbour ferry services

message: Merge Minor ferry wharves in Sydney are insubstantial on a structural level, largely inconsequential to the public transport network as a whole (ferries account of 0.2% of commuter journeys in Sydney). Most importantly, very little information is provided in this article. It is far from clear that more content is forthcoming, the author having exhausted the material available from the ferry company itself. The level of detail shown in this stub can (and is) easily accommodated into the article covering all Inner Harbour ferry services, Sydney. I would suggest that only wharves meeting the primary criterion for notability (multiple publication) be given their own article. Merging the Inner Harbour wharf articles would not lead to a loss of information from Wikipedia. Joestella 15:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really see the need for this. I found the Meadowbank article quite interesting as it stands, so clearly articles can be written. It also looks like no effort has been made to look at offline sources, which (though this is not my area) would be likely to exist in the form of local histories, departmental papers and reports, newspaper articles and such. Rebecca 05:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Meadowbank is not part of this merge proposal. One ferry wharf's notability does not speak to the notability of all ferry wharves. Joestella 05:25, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

text: You can't have one and not the rest. They should all stay. The reason that you won't lose information is because they aren't finished yet, as I haven't had time to finish them off. Your constant merging and changing, Joe, is not helping. JROBBO 10:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Once again, JROBBO is right on the money. Rebecca 00:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge, non-notable
Talk:Parramatta River ferry services

message: Merge Minor ferry wharves in Sydney are insubstantial on a structural level and largely inconsequential to the public transport network as a whole (ferries account of 0.2% of commuter journeys in Sydney). Most importantly, very little information is provided in this article. It is far from clear that more content is forthcoming, the author having exhausted the material readily available from the ferry company itself. The level of detail shown in this stub can (and is) easily accommodated into the article covering all Parramatta River ferry services, Sydney. I would suggest that only wharves meeting the primary criterion for notability (multiple publication) be given their own article. Merging the Parramatta River wharf articles would not lead to a loss of information from Wikipedia. Joestella 15:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really see the need for this. I found the Meadowbank article quite interesting as it stands, so clearly articles can be written. It also looks like no effort has been made to look at offline sources, which (though this is not my area) would be likely to exist in the form of local histories, departmental papers and reports, newspaper articles and such. Rebecca 05:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Oppose - I will try and look for some sources when I have some time (which is not much at present). I have found a book in my local library previously on the history of the local area which has some info on ferry services in the Northern Districts. There is enough information for most ferry wharves, and with the transport information in the others there should be enough to have an article on each one. JROBBO 07:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Can you at least assert notability? Joestella 12:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Oppose Many of the individual ferry wharves are connected with the local history of the area and there should be information about history and services to warrant individual articles. --Alexxx1 (talk/contribs) 07:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge, non-notable 

message: I'm not sure how accurate this link is, but Sydney Maritime state that Kissing point wharf is wheelchair accessible.
I haven't been there so I cannot clarify this point and therefore will not change what is written at the moment. Can this be verified by anyone, now?
Macr237 18:13, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kissing Point Wharf
Talk:List coloring

message: I wonder where is the citation for the claim that the choice number of a graph G is at most log(n) times the chromatic number of that graph, G. I doubt that this has been proven yet.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.132.85.169 (talk) 15:27, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The result is claimed as known in this talk, though I haven't yet tracked down an authoritative source. –Erik Demaine (talk) 01:46, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And a proof of the result is provided in the second part of the talk, though I haven't yet tracked down an authoritative source. 134.176.28.77 (talk) 07:42, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Choice number and chromatic number

message: a lot of this article comprises of words that a normal person wouldnt understand. can someone change this so i can understan d it. thank, James Fitzpatrick  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.23.4.35 (talk) 00:10, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  mechanical jibberish
Talk:Ontario Highway 5

message: Somebody with some time on their hands should rewrite this article. I amended the presnt day route terminus information which was previously incorrect. However, although the remainder of the article is to some degree factually correct, it reads as though it was written by an 11 year old.
I agree! This article is a little confusing.
Dylan Slade 19:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rewrite???

message: Several justification for including this photo. It is a good example of how the province labeled Dundas Street as Highway 5 even though it was downloaded for decades once Highway 427 was created, as both collector and express overhead sign gantries show the 5 in the crown, despite the photo's low resolution (also photo is used for this publication ). From 2009 onward the overhead signage only shows Dundas Street without reference to Highway 5. FobTown (talk) 03:37, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's use elsewhere isn't relevant. What is important is that even zoomed to its full size, the image still barely makes out the shield, which isn't all that important. There are official road maps from the 50s to 1998 that show Highway 5 going though Toronto well after being decommissioned (and we can upload the maps published up to 1971). Literally anything is better than that picture! - Floydian τ ¢ 06:08, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If the clarify of the shield is a sticking point, is there a way to use this photo  from this website ? FobTown (talk) 19:29, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually yes. I got us blanket permission for all of Averill Hecht's photos back in 2010 (forgot about that until now).  - Floydian τ ¢ 01:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the pic as Dundas was Hwy. 5 until 1998, despite being a connecting link. Transportfan70 (talk) 05:47, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: FobTown got himself permabanned finally; I've cleaned up some of his hills to die on, but there's probably a few more lying around. - Floydian τ ¢ 14:16, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of interchange with Highway 427
Talk:Ulpan

message: Respecting "Countries such as Wales, Azerbaijan, Catalonia and New Zealand have all modeled their language instruction on the ulpan" Neither Wales or Catalonia are countries, they are states o regions of United Kingdom and Spain.
Doh! The UK and Spain are States. Wales and Catalonia are countries or regions, depending upon your political point of biew. Catalonia is officially recognised, along with Galiza and the part of the Basque Country recognised as such within the Spanish State as "historical nationalities" according to the trems of the Spanish Constitution. The term "region" is also rather vexed in that these Stateless entities (Wales, Catalonia, etc.) cana lso further be divided up into regions... --84.78.78.41 19:44, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: 2 citations now added Hogyn Lleol ★ (chat) 06:47, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Ohkay Owingeh, New Mexico

message: See . Badagnani (talk) 23:26, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: When I go there, I get a message: "Temporary file open error. Display failed."  What's at the link?  Nyttend (talk) 00:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: PD photo

message: Support merge, seems non-controversial to me, but you might ping Nytend (see above), as he is the WP-guru on this. Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 05:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal with [[San Juan Indian Reservation]] 
Talk:AOL TV

message: AOL TV was to be a competor to WebTV later called MSNtv but for some reason "the new" AOL just decided to wipe it out and all references off its servers. This isn't an ad but a piece of AOL-TimeWarner history.
I have cleaned up the article quite a bit.  Still leaving the 'advertisement' header for further revisions.  Original article very much like an advertisement. --JudahBlaze 01:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

message: The article could do a better job of describing the nature of the AOL TV service.  Did it provide streaming video over broadband connections?  Or was it primarily intended to be used over dial-up connections? 71.219.235.189 (talk) 03:23, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nature of the beast
Talk:Endymion (Simmons novel)

message: The lede says that Endymion was nominated for a British Fantasy Award in 1996.  The problem is that it isn't listed as a nominee in any of the usual references sources for science fiction awards, including Locus, Worlds Without End, or the BSFA site itself.  The source for the claim is the author's own website.  My guess is that it is either an error on the part of the webmaster at Dan Simmons' own site, or Endymion was longlisted and didn't make the actual shortlist nomination.  If I can't find some independent source that Endymion was nominated, I'm leaning toward deleting the reference.  Thoughts? --Icowrich (talk) 20:26, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: British Fantasy Award