lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Clavicle fracture

message: I had a comminuted clavicle fracture as a child. I got a figure 8 cast, and while my clavicle wasn't noticeably shortened, there is an irregular lump on the bone where it fused back together, with a groove in the center.--71.150.249.248 (talk) 05:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Figure 8 cast

message: The following corrections should be made to the article to improve its content. 
Although images are a very useful tool, there are far too many images in this article. The biggest problem with the number of these images, is that they are all, only x-ray images, many poor ones, with no directional arrows. These would be acceptable if they were better images, and more aesthetically pleasing, in addition to more articles that would act as a learning aid for the other sections of the article. 
References are not listed in nearly every section, to substantiate claims. It is important to do so, in order to avoid unintentional plagiarism.
There should not be external links listed in the prognosis section. If they are valid, reliable sources, they should be moved to the reference section at the bottom.
The epidemiology section is reserved for the statistical data reporting on the frequency, prevalence, incidence, etc. Move the second paragraph to another section and add actual statistical data.
Prevention is missing and should be added. 
The following are positive points of this article.
 The treatment section is well-developed, with exceptional detail.
The prognosis section is well written and developed, and simply needs the links moved.
References are valid and reliable. They are great sources, but could use a few more in epidemiology and other sections.
NHearn (talk) 05:49, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer review, May 10, 2012

message: Systematic review doi:10.1093/bmb/ldw029 JFW | T@lk 14:26, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Return to sport
Talk:Our Lady of the Angels School (Illinois)

message: is my impression that various schools & churches have similar names, particularly in  California; there should be  disambiguation  here.  {Our_Lady_of_the_Angels_School_Fire;  Our_Lady_of_the_Angels_School.}
Thank You,
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 17:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It 

message: The official website is really of the related institutions "Mission of Our Lady of the Angels" and formerly "St. Francis of Assisi-Our Lady of the Angels Church". The school closed in 1999, and never had an official website.
http://web.archive.org/web/19990508224739/www.archdiocese-chgo.org/newsreleases/Schools-close99.html - announcement of closing
Lists of archdiocese school sites, of which OLA is absent from 
* https://web.archive.org/web/19990222155652/http://www.archdiocese-chgo.org:80/catholic.html
* http://web.archive.org/web/19991012215306/http://techvision.org/ocechicago/school_web_sites.htm
The most it had was a directory listing at https://web.archive.org/web/20001214180600/http://www.techvision.org/ocechicago/services.htm (this was linked from the Archdiocese of Chicago website) WhisperToMe (talk) 17:28, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of an official website
Talk:Sophie Wright (Emmerdale)

message: This is a stub. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.235.145.5 (talk) 22:11, 25 April 2007
:It certainly was until 18:52, 12 July 2008; since then, it's been a redirect. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:HUSS Park Attractions

message: I believe this article needs a rewrite because of huge amounts of grammatical error, and is almost unreadable.Nathanhillinbl 22:12, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite needed

message: I think that the editor who did the rewrite did a pretty good job, although clearly the translation still loses some of the nuances (a "roundabout" might be what the original article called the rides, but they are just rides in today's english). Also, the distinction between fair/amusement park/theme park in english and the difference between funfair/entertainment park/fair, etc. in german. The Huss company site generally uses the term amusement park. I am going to also do some more research about the company. The article still needs citations to support its statements that the company is the biggest, etc. I did not put in the tags for these places where citation are needed just yet. Good job! --Tinned Elk 22:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pretty good job on rewrite
Talk:Flamingo (disambiguation)

message: This disambiguation page claims that the Panzer II tank was/is known as the Flamingo, but the article on the tank itself makes no mention of it.  Perhaps someone with knowledge could clarify this? Leevclarke 22:16, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This now has a source cited on the article - it seems to have been an experimental version of this tank with a flamethrower attached. :-) Leevclarke 00:15, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Panzer II
Talk:Dale Skeen

message: from the prod edit summary " This article is unreferenced, so it fails wikipedia's most fundamental policy, of verifiability. The edit screen for creation of a new article clearly warns editors that unreferenced material may be deleted, and this article has been tagged as unreferenced since July 2006, which is quite long enough for references to be have been added. However, they haven't been added, and now it's time for this article to be deleted as unverified. A new article on the subject may of course be written in future, if it is referenced to met WP:V and to establish notability| "
but as the cofounder of a notable company,. he probably is notable. The criterion for deletion is unsourceable, not unsourced. Have you even tried to find sources. The line you refer to is a warning that they may be deleted any time, but they are not required to be., DGG (talk) 18:26, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well five years later still needs work. For example, the TIBCO page does not mention him as a founder. I suspect he was involved in some way, but we need more reliable sources to verify what it was specifically, and use more neutral language. Some of the companies are public, so we should be able to dig out the SEC documents for example. W Nowicki (talk) 23:48, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: why deprodded
Talk:Damaris (biblical figure)

message: Damaris is a Peruvian folk singer who has been nominated to the 2008 Latin Grammys.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.236.87.57 (talk) 06:10, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: grammy

message: At least two of the entries here are corrupted. This is just a quick note as I don't now have the time to correct them. These two appear to be reversed:
* Damaris Johnson (1659-1708), an English philosopher.
* Damaris Cudworth Masham (born 1989), an American foolballer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.186.247.120 (talk) 23:25, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: messed up listing
Talk:Blake Wesley (ice hockey)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus, and dab base title. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 18:32, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Blake Wesley →  – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 02:10, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 December 2022
Talk:Kingdom of Hanover

message: As far, as I understand, that flag that is now in the article is the flag, that has been in use from 1837-1866.  Before that from 1692 till 1837 this flag was in use:. Could both flags be shown in the infobox? Anne-theater (talk) 23:26, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Flags of Hanover

message: The page states that Hanover had a personal union with the United Kingdom from 1814 to 1837. However, the Personal union page stated that the union began in 1714. That makes sense, as both George I and George II were both part of the House of Hanover. Could someone fix this mistake? --75.68.122.13 (talk) 19:42, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Person Union with the United Kingdom

message: This article translates 
"Suscipere et Finire" as 
"Support and Finish". This does not seem very meaningful as a motto, and indeed seems a mistranslation of the Latin meaning. "Suscipere" (composition of "sub" and the verb "capere"; the verb "capere" has as its main meaning "to catch, to take") may mean "to support", in some contexts, but also "to take up" hence "to take a task upon oneself". Hence a proper translation may be "to undertake and to accomplish" (as at https://eudict.com/?lang=lateng&word=suscipere%20et%20finire ) or "to undertake and to finish", or if one does not like the hyper-impersonal rhetorical form of such mottos, one can paraphrase it as "what we start, we finish".
Attentive21 (talk) 20:46, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning of the motto
Talk:Electorate of Hanover

message: Ĝ==Title==
Should this article not be at Electorate of Hanover? Almost all English-language sources I've encountered on the subject describe it as Hanover rather than Brunswick-Lüneburg. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 17:57, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The land area and other geographic facts should be conveyed by this article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.17.117.146 (talk) 17:38, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Land Area?
Talk:King George School (Sutton, Vermont)

message: more required. Pictures? Victuallers 22:22, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Orlady has brought the ownership up to date. Note that we do not have continuity between the "parents and teachers rescue" of an earlier year and UHS ownership. Missing something. Student7 (talk) 23:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Xinhai Revolution/Archive

message: I have translated part of this article with help from google translate. It is not perfect, but yeah, so that people who cant understand chinese can read. more translating would be greatly appreciated.
Da 1!
: Thanks.. Machine translation does not make sense at all though. I'll modify it. AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites)  01:47, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation from Simplified Chinese 

message: Is it that 60,000 modern colleges were built before the Xinhai Revolution, or is that there were 60,000 students enrolled? Please clarify. 60,000 colleges in 7 years sounds pretty ambitious. Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 04:48, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  60,000 colleges? 

message: Are there any figures in regards to the specifics of each side? (Yuan Shikai seems to be a wildcard though - he can be a third faction.) Elle vécut heureuse à jamais (Be eudaimonic!) 18:00, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  military conflict box 

message: Okay, I am going to expand this article. An epic event like the Xinhai Revolution being stub-ish is simply unacceptable.
--AQu01rius 01:01, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm almost there. Woosh. Thanks to all that helped on cleaning up my writing  :) AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites)  18:25, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article expansion 

message: There is mixed usage for Chinese romanization here, for example Huang Hsing is in Wade-Giles.  I think that given the time period, being rather close to the present, the use of pinyin only, without Wade-Giles, is appropriate.  The only exception should be Sun Yat-Sen given that this is the historically accepted form at least in English.  I will start to do that unless there is dissent on the subject.  Silentcity 19:30, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. AQu01rius (User | Talk | Websites)  17:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of pinyin for all names 

message: Should we unify the usage of "Society" and "Hui"? Right now it's mixed and it's sort of confusing. AQu01rius (User | Talk) 05:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hui / Society
Talk:2002–03 NFL playoffs

message: This is written...
In the extra period, referee Ron Blum announced that each team had three timeouts, which was odd considering they were supposed to get two.
...it is actually wrong, and the article cited appears to be either misquoted, misleading, or was also incorrect.
*In regular season play, the overtime period is "special," and it mimicks a repeat of the fourth quarter. Each team gets 2 timeouts. They have a 2 minute warning as well.
*In postseason play, the overtime is different. It's been compared to "starting the game over." They treat the quarters as they are normally..1st, 2nd, etc., and each team gets 3 timeouts per "half."
**Note that the Carolina/St. Louis overtime game a year later demonstrated this. The first 15 minute period expired with no scoring. They did not have a 2 minute warning at the end of that first period. That put them into a second overtime period. Instead of re-kicking off, the teams traded sides (as they normally do at the end of the first quarter), and they drive continued where they left off.
I'm going to correct the text to reflect the correct rules. Doctorindy (talk) 22:21, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Ten/Pit game

message: I have eliminated the mention of the 2005 Redskins and Panthers teams. Previously they had been cited as teams that came close to a #5 versus #6 matchup. I find this to be irrelevant  for the purposes of this article and distracting from the main point. Also, the 2010 #5 seed Ravens nearly hosted the #6 seed Jets in the playoffs, so Redskins/Panthers was not the only time this nearly occurred. In the end, there is no reason to talk about teams from 2005, 2010, etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PowerSurge1000 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mention of 2005-06 Redskins and Panthers 

message: Is it just me, or is this game's recap written from a Philadelphia Eagles POV rather than a neutral one? CRRaysHead90 | We Believe! 13:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NFC Championship game POV
Talk:2001–02 NFL playoffs

message: This looks like February 2001: "National Football League playoffs, 2001-02" --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 17:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No it looks like the playoffs for the 2001 NFL season which concluded in February 2002. 2001-02 is the best naming convention. Pats1 17:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date
Talk:1998–99 NFL playoffs

message: I removed a sentence which stated that the Atlanta Falcons beating the Minnesota Vikings is widely considered the greatest playoff upset of all time.  I removed it because it wasn't sourced and is a really dubious statement at that.  Who says this?  It was a two seed beating a one seed, which isn't all that remarkable.  Minnesota had an amazing offense that year and the game was an upset, but biggest ever?  It is a notable game, I believe it is referred to as the "Gary Anderson field goal game," but notable as being yet another Minnesota playoff melt down.  There have been bigger upsets.  The Giants beating the then undefeated Patriots in the Super Bowl was a bigger upset by any measure.  So unless a columnist called it the greatest upset ever and the editor wishes to say "so and so called it the greatest upset ever" it's a meaningless statement.  The statement of something being 'widely considered' is a poorly written weisel statement that should be avoided without sources.12.186.80.1 (talk) 20:12, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greatest Playoff Upset 

message: Hi, I have a proposed article for this moment at Draft:The Catch II, as I feel this game is significant in NFL lore and requires its own article. Please let me know what you think. Thanks. Malcolm L. Mitchell (talk) 02:52, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: We need to demonstrate WP:SUSTAINED coverage of the play.  As it is, the page is currently more about the game itself, and then some coverage on The Play III.—Bagumba (talk) 12:33, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , thank you for the feedback. I could really use some help putting this article together, I think it has a place on here as a stand alone subject. It's been a deeply discussed game for years now in NFL history regarding Terrell Owens and the 49ers franchise. Thanks. Malcolm L. Mitchell (talk) 01:35, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Take a look at the sources at Holy Roller (American football).  If you can show that there is significant coverage of the play years after, and not just passing mention, there would be justification for considering a spinoff.  Then there would need to be enough content that would make it WP:UNDUE to put on the playoff article. I can help review an updated draft.—Bagumba (talk) 02:01, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Catch II
Talk:Quinotaur

message: Weirdly, historic images showing quinotaurus are for somewhy rather seld but they do exist…
https://digitalcollections.nypl.org/items/510d47e3-06d7-a3d9-e040-e00a18064a99
Also, haps no happenstance that the wellknown Michael Aquino has a rather akinlike lastname? 2A00:23C7:2B13:9001:E9DB:C318:8C3C:F8E4 (talk) 00:03, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rather unschooledlooking article needs an moreso ‘historic likeness’ of said quinotaurus
Talk:James Doyle

message: who is james richard doyle? Sounds like trolling to me
:He's some [supposeèdly] 20 year old kid who thought it'd be cool to have himself mentioned in a Wikipedia article.  Until he meets WP:NOTE, however, I've removed him from this page.  Tomertalk 06:08, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[James Richard Doyle]]

message: looking for microbiology immunology specialist familiar with eyelash mites, 172.58.43.134 (talk) 03:42, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  burning man 

message: a brother named Chris. 172.58.43.134 (talk) 03:44, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  iminiolbiologest
Talk:Abdullahi v. Pfizer, Inc.

message: First of all the "summary" is too long.  We need a summary of the summary, preferably outlining the main points.
Secondly the pictures don't seem to have much to do with the actual case.  Adding in a picture of the different courts of appeals in the US should be removed for something more pivotal to this case.  Also Jimmy Carter shouldn't have his picture in there just for "getting involved".  This article is very poorly done as of right now. Fatrb38 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 11:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article needs to be cleaned up 

message: Is the 1996 incident notable enough to warrant a wikipaedia page of its own. If it is then the ongoing litigation could become a section in that new page. Litigation as a page in itself seems unusual.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.6.94.47 (talk) 03:11, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page's subject become a section of the 1996 incident? 

message: Just tagged 2009 settlement section as requiring update. The section states: "An out-of-court settlement was reached and will be put in writing at a meeting scheduled to take place in Rome, Italy in March 2009" and we're passed 2009
(the tag propoclol suggests a comment on the talk page if it's used)
Icarusgeek (talk) 15:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009 settlement
Talk:Daniel Q. Brown

message: For now I'm leaving this one be; he consecrated Schuckhardt, which gives him at least a little notability. TallNapoleon (talk) 02:25, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Apart from the 1983 article, the only mention of Brown I managed to find on the internet is an article by Anthony Cekada and a page of a Gnostic website. Veverve (talk) 15:46, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only things I could find
Talk:Fluorescent Adolescent

message: where was this vertified? It isn't on their site that this will be the next single, the link has nothing to do with this song. Also the grammar isn't even right. Halo475 14:44, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why wouldn't they put it on the "releases" section of their website??? At least wait a while before it gets sorted.--SteelersFan UK06 13:14, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

message: before it comes out in the rest of  the world
TIA
:Why don't people ever sign comments anymore? I guess what the person above is trying to say is, why are the band releasing the new single in Japan before anywhere else? Is this just another one of those random things from the Artic Monkeys? Or was there any particular reason? I have no idea :S --SteelersFan UK06 03:15, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Anyone know Why it comes out in Japan? 

message: I know i just posted, but i want to point out that in the article it states what the B-sides will be on the 7-inch, which differs to what they are in the release listings at the bottom of the page. --SteelersFan UK06 03:18, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusion

message: Could someone delete this part please? Both songs share some characteristics, but it's really not noticeable unless explicitly pointed out- and even then it's not remarkable. (Anon)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.111.70.217 (talk) 00:45, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity to Kara's Flowers song 
Talk:Darius Moon

message: According to local history, Darius Moon was raised in the "Moon Log Cabin" which was moved from south-east of the Canal Rd/Mt Hope Hwy intersection to the property of Woldumar Nature Center. This information is sourced from Woldumar's website but someone better versed in local history could likely find a more primary source: https://www.woldumar.org/history.php
I have uploaded an original photo of the cabin to the Wikimedia Commons: 
Davenport651 (talk) 13:31, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Darius Moon's boyhood home
Talk:1988–89 NFL playoffs

message: The NFL record and fact book puts both wild card games (AFC and NFC) as being played on Mon Dec 26. I noticed Wikipedia has the AFC as being on Saturday Dec 24 Smith03 (talk) 17:47, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Which version/year of the NFL Record and Fact Book are you looking at? It might be a typo on that particular version. The ProFootballReference web site says that the Oilers-Browns AFC wild card game was on the 24th. My copy of Total Football () says December 24. This preview article from the New York Times says December 24. This recap article from Cleveland.com/Cleveland Plain Dealer says the 24th. Same with the Chicago Tribune's preview article. There are also these recap articles from the Sun-Sentinel and the LA Times that are dated December 25 (thus published the day after the game on the 24th; obviously impossible if the game was played instead on the 26th), and clearly state that the game was played on a Saturday. I can find more articles via a Google search that says it was played on Saturday, December 24, 1988. Zzyzx11 (talk) 04:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:1979–80 NFL playoffs

message: In the summary of the Buccaneers-Rams NFC Championship Game, it is stated that the Rams 9-0 was the first conference championship game where no touchdowns were scored.  This is accurate.   However, the person posted that the next time that happened was the 2006 AFC Divisional Playoff between the Indianapolis Colt and Baltimore Ravens.   The score was 15-6, and the scoring was only field goals.   so, that part of this is right.... but, where it was wrong was that it was NOT a conference championship game.  it was a divisional playoff game.   it even says 'AFC Divisional Playoff' in the title of the page for this game.    I went ahead and removed that inaccurate piece of information Irishtats (talk) 00:49, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conference Championship Games section
Talk:Datsakorn Thonglao

message: This article is weird. doesn't fit in with wiki's style to me...
218.186.9.3 15:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  fan article? 

message: Datsakorn! :) –The does (talk) 08:44, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do you call a Thai footballer who happens to be a crop