lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:PS Medway Queen

message: Just by way of explanation, a bot had labelled the article as missing coordinates, presumably because of the visitor attractions in Kent category.  I know it's a bit debatable whether an article like this should have coordinates, but if it drives a bit more traffic to the article via Google Maps, then they're worth having IMO. However whilst she's in bits it doesn't seem quite right to tag her with Bristol or the office block in Rochester where the charity is based, so for the time being I've tagged her with low-precision coordinates in the middle of the Medway, between Damhead Creek and Chatham Docks. Once she's back in one piece on the Medway, they can be updated with wherever she ends up getting berthed, presumably it'll be at Chatham? 82.2.128.157 (talk) 23:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: I have updated the references- John may feel wrongly credited for the website- but he is vice chair -- Clem Rutter (talk) 17:31, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Referencing 

message: In this edit summary User:ClemRutter asks if there was more than one Coronation fleet review. The simple answer is yes, and according to the article, Medway Queen attended two. Not both for QE2 of course but I think the wording can be improved; not necessarily by my replacement of 'the' by 'a'. Help please.SovalValtos (talk) 21:15, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops- apologies. Would something like 'the 1953 Coronation fleet review be a way forward- do we need to create an article? --ClemRutter (talk) 22:23, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I have made some changes. Still room for further improvement.SovalValtos (talk) 09:46, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fleet review 

message: Is there a way someone can add in a reference to her being mentioned in a short video from a youtube source. I think this video here did help get her some attention back in 2017 when this video was released by the World of Warships Official Channel. I would do it myself but I'm no wikipedia guru. 2605:A601:A542:2500:F86B:7883:8645:85D6 (talk) 17:59, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I have put the YouTube link in the External links section. You can learn quickly how to make links, by looking at the source; just click on "edit" and check out the formatting. If you want to add information and a citation into the body text of the article, open the edit box, and click on "cite", then chose from the options given (web, news, etc.). That will give you a drop down box with the form for the citation. I hope that helps. Storye book (talk) 19:34, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add reference?
Talk:The Wedding (band)

message: We have 4 genres up there right now. The Wedding's style is really not that varied. We need to decide on two. Alternative rock definitely needs to stay up there. What else? Any suggestions? Sources? -- FatalError (t|c) 03:54, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't matter. People care too much about that. 90% of changes to rock band articles are genre changes. Chubbles (talk) 04:02, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: FatalError, there is no WP policy on the number of genre's, and alt rock doesn't get to stay because that's what you think they are (or what other fans think they are or even what the band considers themself).  the only genre's that should be concluded, really, are those supported by independent (separate from the band) reliable sources.  see WP:RS and WP:PRIMARY. Wikiwikikid (talk) 21:55, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That conversation's a year old. I doubt it's much concern to him now. Chubbles (talk) 22:09, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha!  I didn't read the year on the comments.  However, no harm in making this known in any case... Wikiwikikid (talk) 18:39, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre... 

message: They are an amazing band.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.138.72.186 (talk) 02:44, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Band...
Talk:Dreamwork

message: The article currently mixes passages that each assume one of two quite different uses of the term "dreamwork", without adequately distinguishing between them (or rather it still does this, see Tcassedy's 2007 comment below). Most of the lede follows the usage of Ullman et al., i.e. uses 'dreamwork' to refer to approaches to the interpretation of dreams, while most of the body of the article focuses on Freud's usage, in which the term refers to processes of the production of dreams. --Aingotno (talk) 11:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article into two? 

message: I've done a bit of editing for POV - there's still some there but it seems difficult to remove without gutting the article (which would remove far too much of the substance) or totally rewriting (which I don't think I could do well).  At the moment the article is a fairly simply description of how dreamworking happens, but written in a fairly normative way(for instance "it is best if..").  It would be good to get some analysis of dreamwork's effectiveness and/or its impact on the dream interpretation world.  It's not clear to me from this article how well accepted dreamwork is in the dream interpretation field, what its perceived strengths and weaknesses are and even why someone would participate (what's the point?  therapy? personal growth? Will it help people with some forms of mental illness?  Does participating extend life expectancy, improve perceived happiness levels, lower stress? etc.). 
Also, we really need some references - surely there are some academic journal articles somewhere...-- SiobhanHansa 13:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: I came to this page looking for information on the "dream-work" (die Traumwerk) described by Freud.  In Freudian dream-interpretation, the "dream-work" is the name of the mental process that converts the dreamer's anxieties, thoughts, desires, etc., into a dream.  It is the engine that produces the dream out of the available psychological raw materials.  I kind of suspect that this sense of the term is in wider use than the one described on this page, but I'm not sure.  Tcassedy 00:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other sense of "dreamwork" 

message: Double, double, boil n bubble...
A measure of white coral entwined with a polychromatic chain-of-hearts, akashic records enveloped in holographic phantasmagoria. 
Cord magic] = knotwork, bound with sapiential 'INpsiT' (inSIGHT)...dream journal: a living-text that decodes as it encodes... 
Dream yourself Awake! 
Ah, the Art of Interpenetration...
B9 hummingbird hovering (talk • contribs) 12:31, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bind a dream journal to yourself and they will come... 

message: I dreamnt I was fighting with a person who was a friend of mine but died three years ago. I was fight in a dream with a dead person. What does it me to dream of such Mac the wonder (talk) 00:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning of my dream
Talk:Kumbla

message: Don't start Language Fundamentalism in Wikipedia...
ARUNKUMAR P.R (talk · contribs) 09:56, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:16-inch/50-caliber M1919 gun

message: The article moves over the Army M1919 & the USN 16"/50 Mk 1 & 2 without making a clear distiction between the two - the former being a little longer, heavier & constructed quite differently to the latter.  
The additional information regarding the M1895 doesn't help in this regard.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.75.48.5 (talk) 16:37, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewritten for greater clarity, with info on gun types in chronological order. RobDuch (talk) 05:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing regarding the M1911 & the naval 16"/50 Mk.1/2. 

message: The article states that 20 guns were transferred to the Army after the cancellation of the South Dakota and Lexington class ships.  The South Dakotas were to have mounted 12 guns each, and there were to be 6 of them, the Lexigtons were to have mounted 8 gun each, and there were to be 6 of them.  That would have been 120 guns, and presumably spare barrels as well.
The article then states that the Army intended to build 27 batteries using these guns.  Each battery would have had at least 2 guns.  
Was "20 guns transferred to the Army" incorrect?  Were the 120 guns needed for the original Navy plan not produced?  Were some guns retained by the Navy?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.152.94.226 (talk) 07:29, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Re-written to better explain the situation.  Gun production was abruptly halted in 1922-23 when the Washington Naval Treaty went into effect.  About 75 Mark 2 and Mark 3 guns were produced.  Initially only 20 were released to the Army in the 1930s; the Navy retained the rest for future battleships.  After a design fiasco with the , the remaining guns were transferred to the Army in mid-1940 and the Mark 7 gun was designed for the Iowas. RobDuch (talk) 05:13, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many built?
Talk:Pillar (disambiguation)

message: Does it exist in english any difference between column and pillar? I came here because there a lot of confuzion of interwikis between Pilaster, which is false friend in many languages because it means pillar
But definitely pillar is not a column in italian or german or french... column has a round section, pillar a squared or other ways shaped section. --Sailko 13:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:T20 Blast

message: A discussion is taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket about how English domestic cricket competitions are named - specifically whether or not sponsor's names should be used in the titles of competitions and how they might be grouped together. A formal merge proposal will follow, but anyone interested might like to start with the discussion there. Thanks. Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:37, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of English cricket competitions
Talk:Elmer Gantry's Velvet Opera

message: I've done this as the article now has pretty well all the information it needs, much else would be trivia. Brieflysentient (talk) 23:33, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed stub class

message: The link to this band has been removed without any reason being given. Both Richard Hudson and John Ford were members of this band. I will revert. best Witchwooder (talk) 08:39, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  High Society 

message: I wonder if there should be a separate artiv=cle for Elmer Gantry the singer, not the band. -- Beardo (talk) 01:26, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate band from singer ?
Talk:Thinking Plague

message: I'm pretty sure the Mark Harris linked in the article is a different musician. - Jmabel | Talk 09:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, this is Thinking Plague's Mark Harris. I've delinked him. —Bruce1eetalk 04:54, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Harris
Talk:Power cell

message: *This is a disambiguation page.  Please do not add entries that are not synonymous with the phrase "Power cell" to this page. Groupthink 13:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig

message: Disambiguation pages disambiguate Wikipedia articles, so lists of external links are unneeded and undesirable.  This page, in particular, should not include a list of companies that are called "Power Cell" unless there is a Wikipedia article about the company. -- JHunterJ 10:29, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:True Names

message: In External links, the link to the "original" online text is 404 Not Found, but the "HTML transcription" is still accessible. --Thnidu (talk) 22:38, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The working link goes to the Internet Archive's "Wayback machine", and is simply an archived copy of what used to be at the (now dead) "original" link, which is presumably included for reference only.  -- magetoo 16:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Original" text 404
Talk:DirectLOGIC

message: See DirectLOGIC results for my justification of notability.  John Vandenberg 14:04, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Google scholar results 

message: Possible justification of notability: http://www.exemys.com/beta/english/pdf/technicalnotes/TN09_KOYO_E.pdf
Only1chip (talk) 20:29, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just. of Notability
Talk:Collared peccary

message: Formal request has been received to merge: Giant peccary into Collared peccary; dated: August 2021. Proposer's Rationale: The giant peccary has not been accepted as a valid species by any major zoological authority. It has instead been listed as a synonym for the collared peccary. I believe the proposed description/historic information of the giant peccary should merely take up a section in the Collared peccary article. —.  Discuss it here. GenQuest "scribble" 04:24, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup; no point in keeping separate articles for synonymized taxa. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 13:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

text: The text from this article can be transferred to Collared peccary#Taxonomy. HFoxii (talk) 04:34, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Agree with above Geekgecko (talk) 06:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge request
Talk:List of birds of Saint Lucia

message: This revision converts the article to the taxonomy of the American Ornithological Society's Check-list of North and Middle American Birds for consistency with other western hemisphere lists for entities north of South America. In addition it brings the list itself up to date. The specific changes, which follow AOS unless noted otherwise, are:
*Revise the sequence of families.
*Revise the Orders of families Apodidae (swifts) and Trochilidae (hummingbirds).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Charadriidae (plovers and lapwings).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Scolopacidae (sandpipers and allies).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Tyrannidae (tyrant flycatchers).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Hirundinidae (swallows).
*Revise the sequence of species in family Thraupidae (tanagers and allies).
*Delete a species and revise tags per Avibase.
*Revise the text, counts, and references to reflect the above.
Craigthebirder (talk) 14:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  September 19, 2020 revision
Talk:Piney Gir

message: I thought her real surname was Penhaligon, but now the article says 'Lakey'. I'm sure 'Lakey is wrong'..
I've looked and can't find any evidence to support the name. I can find a whole lot of stuff supporting 'Penhaligon' however. Unless someone can come up with a valid reference for 'Lakey' (and 'Dawne' for that matter) it should be changed.
PassingScottishBloke 92.16.12.117 (talk) 19:47, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Real Name 

message: Doesn't seem to merit separate article. Infobox seems confused as to whether it's for a person or a band (and has different birthname). Suggest a "Country Roadshow" section in the Piney Gir article. PamD 22:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 11:10, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Piney Gir Country Roadshow]] 

message: This article is filled with original research, especially the Discography section, so I've added the appropriate maintenance tag. Lennart97 (talk) 23:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research
Talk:All the Things You Are

message: The article says it has 34 bars, but according to
this picture, there are 36 bars.--Schwalker 14:26, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are 3 8-bar sections and one 12-bar section from my experience. These add up to 36. Eman235/talk 04:56, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many bars? 

message: I'm doing an experiment to see if playable musical examples can be successfully posted in Wikipedia music articles.
I would propose adding this kind of playable example to provide illustrative context for the song form description that is used in this article.
Play this example
I'm trying to find a way to place an <EMBED> tag into a Wikipedia article that would play a MIDI format file. This would allow a play controller to be placed immediately below the example score. It would look like this.
It does seem like the Wikimedia music guidlines would like all music sample postings to be in Ogg Vorbis format.
For this kind of example, an Ogg Vorbis posting would use immense resources compared to a MIDI posting (240Kb for .ogg, 4K for .mid). MIDI is a format universally recognized by web browsers as far as I know.
I did find that translating to Ogg Vorbis formatting using the highest possible bitrate setting produces an acceptable translation of a MIDI sequence. This causes the resulting sequence file size to blow up by a factor of 60.
DLuebbert (talk) 19:22, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's been a request to provide more context and better explanations of the technical details 

message: "The song was written for the musical Very Warm for May (1939)..."
and further down:
Notable Recordings:
Helen Forrest, Artie Shaw (1938)
Joffboff (talk) 16:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Timeline
Talk:Hessian dialects

message: I do not agree with the explanation of Wolfgang Näser as it was given here. We have different ethnic roots in Hesse. There is the former arear of the Chatten or modern spoken Hessen which is equal to Northern Hesse (around the city of Kassel) (Niederhessen), Central Hesse (including the Marburg and Gießen area) (Oberhessen) and Eastern Hesse (around Fulda). And there is the Rhein-Main-Gebiet were no Chatten tribe lives for longer time. 
And we have too a public tv-service which promoted a synthetic dialect. To put it bluntly, tv created by his own an new Hessian identity and ignored historic dialects and heritage when was promoting the Rhein-Main-Hessisch. Rhein-Main-Hessisch which is created after Südhessischer Dialekt today also liquidate the Südhessischen Dialekt.     
Grettings from Kassel 91.37.99.117 (talk) 15:20, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

message: This page should be merged into Hessian dialects. Sarcelles (talk) 20:32, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: author verification is at (http://userweb.port.ac.uk/~joyce1/dialects/wmdhesse.html goto 9th entry under Südhessisch ) for Carsten KeilDrift chambers (talk) 15:36, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removals
Talk:Như Quỳnh

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Clear primary topic. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 03:00, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 May 2022
Talk:Royal Canadian Mint numismatic coins (2000s)

message: At present I'm afraid this article should probalby not qualify for B class rating on the quality scale.  It looks like a massive information dump, with limited accessibility for the general reader.  As such does not meet the 6 B-Class Criteria .  I will place a request for assessment  and post a clean-up template to hopefully attract the help of more editors. --Whoosit (talk) 20:04, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: B Class Rating

message: Shouldn't the million-dollar gold coin be included in this list? 70.72.223.215 (talk) 06:03, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Million dollar coin?

message: I came across the following on a Royal Canadian Mint webpage, p. 11:
In celebration of the Year of the Veteran and the 60th Anniversary of the Allied victory in the Second World War, four coins and coin sets were introduced. These were the five-cent sterling silver coin and medallion set depicting VE Day Celebrations; the five-dollar silver coin depicting the 60th Anniversary of the end of the Second World War; the 50-cent sterling silver six coin set also marking the End of the Second World War; and the Brilliant Uncirculated Coin Set with a 25-cent sterling silver coin and eight brilliant uncirculated Euro coins and a commemorative Royal Dutch medallion. The coins are dedicated to 60 years of liberation highlighting the special relationship between Canada and the Netherlands
I've found everything from this quote on this Numismatic page, except the joint issue with the Royal Dutch Mint.  However, I don't know much about numismatics, so I don't know if it should be added here.  Could someone take a look at it?  Thanks! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:17, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joint Issue with Royal Dutch Mint?
Talk:Jane Doe (film series)

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Pages moved to XXX (film series) - there was consensus to shorten the current disambiguation, and a majority in favour of "film series" as disambiguator.  — Amakuru (talk) 13:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Rob. Under WP:NCF the correct disambiguator would be (film series). (TV series) is for episodic television, so it's not really applicable here. The medium itself isn't all that important for disambiguation purposes. Betty Logan (talk) 08:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I also agree with Rob Sinden. The same should be for Women's Murder Club (TV series). I think this discussion should be moved to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television. --Musdan77 (talk) 19:38, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we're okay discussing here.  We seem to be making a consensus.  But by all means put a note up if there isn't one already.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 20:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
PLEASE BRING BACK JANE DOE   good show  PLEASE  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.191.240.137 (talk) 02:35, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move
Talk:Cotton Mather (band)

message: It certainly wasn't meant to be an advertisement, I have nothing to gain. (The band no longer exists anyway.) I wanted to show how their rise to success happened, with Noel Gallagher and Oasis being so impressed, show the accolades from the press, and indicate their notability. It seems that if I write an article about a band without expressing such notability, someone comes along and marks the article for speedy deletion with the comment "not notable". Any suggestions are welcomed. Gekritzl 14:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I appreciate the quotes on who says they're a good band (they're better than weasely claims like "Cotton Mather is considered a great band."), but there's no substance to the article beyond those quotes. Look at GA and FA band articles or even lesser rated articles like Oasis (band) for ideas on what additional info could fit here. --Flex (talk/contribs) 02:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ad
Talk:Gambier Terrace

message: Is this Gambier Terrace? http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/97960 -- Robert Weemeyer 14:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes.--NeilEvans 22:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Tentaculites

message: Tentaculites actually ranges from the Ordovician to the Permian. They may also be lophophorates rather than mollusks.  I'd do the editing here, but I can't concentrate on it for a few days.  If someone else wants to do it ... please! Wilson44691 (talk) 20:46, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range and affinities