lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bell 202 modem

message: Details of the modulation technique (frequencies, etc.) would be useful here.
I know the Bell 202 supported several different operating modes, including an asymmetrical one where upstream data was sent at (I think) 75 bps.  Unfortunately, I haven't found a reliable source for this information.
Simon 15:44, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: According to the creator of APRS, APRS stands for Automatic Packet Reporting System and not Automatic Postion Reporting System, see Bob Bruninga, WB4APR 's web site.
Mikelachaine (talk) 15:55, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  APRS acronym 

message: Surely AFSK would properly stand for "Amplitude Frequency Shift Keying", not "Audio Frequency Shift Keying". If it is "Audio ...", then this should be well noted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.184.50.47 (talk) 02:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: What is "Amplitude Frequency Shift Keying"? Do any references explain that term? If it exists, it should at least be mentioned in the digital modulation article. (However, I'm fairly sure all modems transmitting over voice channels, such as this one, actually use audio frequencies). --DavidCary (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFSK acronym 

message: In North America (and perhaps elsewhere) <--- perhaps? where?
The modified Bell 202 AFSK modulation, AX.25, <--- AX.25 is a data link layer protocol, and has nothing to do with FSK modulation  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.170.101.99 (talk) 20:09, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incongruencies on this article 

message: I removed
:and at a rate of 1800 bits per second full duplex 
from the lede since Bell 202 is half-duplex I'm quite sure.  An 1800 bps full duplex modem with that sort of modulation would not have been possible on a phone line, at least with technology of the era.  I believe the scheme could do 1800 bps half duplex in principle, but was usually used at 1200.  There was (I think) a reverse channel that someone might have confused with full duplex, but it was at very low speed, like 5 bps.  The idea was you could use it to send a "break" signal to tell the other end to stop sending and switch to receive mode.  I'm sure the specs for this are still around.
AX.25 uses the same audio frequencies as Bell 202 but in other regards is completely different (signalling, frame formats etc).
69.228.171.139 (talk) 19:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  full duplex 

message: Well, which is it? AFSK or DPSK? It's certainly not both, and I'm also quite certain that the Bell 202 was FSK, not PSK. The description of frequencies implies that it's AFSK, since DPSK relies on phase shifts in the signal, not frequency.
Plaidomatic (talk) 21:32, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree -- the references in this article may briefly mention DPSK, but they all seem to agree that the Bell 202 used audio frequency-shift keying (AFSK). --DavidCary (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modulation
Talk:Baby M

message: Article needs substance, persondata, infobox etc. - Duribald 05:00, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A medical college of hers
Should that be colleague? Josh Cherry 15:46, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion 1

message: The article currently says that "[Mary Beth Whitehead] has been mistakenly called the surrogate mother, but she is a biological parent of Baby M." The term surrogacy seems to have two scopes: under one Whitehead would both be the surrogate and biological mother (because "surrogate" sometimes refers to all mothers who carried a child intended for it to be raised by another from conception), and in the other not so, because she wasn't only a gestational carrier. Thayvian (talk) 07:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a surrogate? 

message: I've tagged one of the sources of this article for clarification. The paragraph discusses an article in the Daily Mail on Sunday and uses quotes from that article. However, the citation given is for a private legal website. While the website itself may well be reliable, a source for the original source would be preferable. Wildhartlivie (talk) 17:08, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag

message: There are 2 different sections with the same title "Aftermath". 151.46.11.134 (talk) 11:02, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aftermath 
Talk:Maurice Ravel

message: Quote: "As a result, there are few leading notes in his output." This is referenced, but via a paywall, and its meaning is unclear. Does it really mean that he wrote mostly using only the first six notes of the diatonic scale? Surely inconceivable, so what does it mean? Imaginatorium (talk) Imaginatorium (talk) 14:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: So sorry: I failed to spot this addition until now. The Grove article starts "The seventh Degree of the major, harmonic minor, or ascending melodic minor scale, so called because it lies a semitone below the tonic and therefore has a strong tendency to lead up to it." I haven't got Taruskin's book to hand any more. Tim riley talk 17:45, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leading notes 

message: @Tim riley, I changed the titles of the sections because I thought that, if a section must use the full name "First World War", it ought to be the section which actually refers to the time period, rather than the previous time period ("1910 to First World War). I don't know, it just looked a bit funny to me, not a big deal. IntGrah (talk) 18:37, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for that courteous and gracious explanation. I'm inclined to stick with the agreed FA text, but I shan't press the point. Tim riley talk 18:57, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section titles
Category talk:Northern Ireland

message: The article in the Category: "Northern Ireland" entitled "Districts of Northern Ireland" should be deleted and replaced with "Local Councils in Northern Ireland". These districts are properly Local Council areas. 
See the definite (?) NI Government website OnlineNI[1] (http://www.onlineni.net/index/about_ni_gov/local_councils.htm) 
-- Ardfern 16:38, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jan 2005
Talk:Opel Ascona

message: There seems to be some confusion regarding the Shinjin Royale, Saehan Rekord Royale, Daewoo Royale, Daewoo Prince, Daewoo Royale Duke, Royale XQ, 
and Daewoo Imperial. These were all based on the Opel Rekord/Commodore, in spite of what the German editors say on their Wikipedia page. The Opel Ascona was never built in Korea. I have removed all the offending references.  ⊂ Mr.choppers ⊃  (talk) 21:08, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Shinjin Royale

message: The Lancia 037 article (and top gear) claim that the Lancia 037 was the last RWD victor in WRC - maybe this needs to be reworded? 
In 1983, Audi won drivers champ, but Lancia won the constructors champ...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.148.112.105 (talk) 23:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Unsigned, the statement about the Opel Ascona is actually correct. While the Lancia 037 was indeed the last RWD car to win the the world constructors championship in 1983, the world drivers championship that year was won by Hannu Mikkola who was driving an Audi Quattro A1/A2. The last victor of the world drivers championship in a RWD car was Walter Röhrl in 1982 who was driving an Opel Ascona 400--51.199.111.229 (talk) 19:32, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: WRC Victories
Talk:Moyle District Council

message: Article title needs to be amended to read "Moyle District Council"
Don't know how to get this done. Help anyone. Ardfern 18:25, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig alert 

message: I deleted this bit:
Since all the local councils of Northern Ireland as [sic] now considered counties Moyle has the distinction of being the smallest county in the UK.
As far as I know, the local councils are not considered the same as counties. Unitary authorities and counties have the same border markings on OS maps, and quite probably on OSNI maps as well, but they're different forms of local government. And even if they were, a cursory glance at the map on this page shows several districts smaller than Moyle, so it's absurd even to say that it's the smallest local authority. -- Blisco 15:37, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Aren't the Isles of Scilly and the City of London (which have smaller populations) considered principal local authorities? //Essin (talk) 22:59, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smallest county? 
Talk:Flying Tigers

message: Does Anyone know EXACTLY what the writing on it States ?  We have not figured it out as of yet.  Thank You.  Please contact me at: 
luv4tranquility@gmail.com  Mary Luv2discover (talk) 04:45, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flying Tiger's Patch on Back of Jacket 

message: In the lead it says "during the lowest period of the war for both the U.S. and the Allied Forces" this is not so. Things were much lower afer the defeat of France (when memebers of the Britih cabinate considered putting out peace feelers). By this period of the war things for Britain were not so dark; as Winston Churchill said on hearing of the attack on Pearl Harbour he "went to bed and slept the sleep of the saved" because he realized that now Britain and her allies could not loose the war. So I think that this wording needs to be alterd. — PBS (talk) 11:08, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lowest period of the war 

message: There was one pilot from Poland, Witold Urbanowicz. He was fighting volunteerly (as a guest) against Japan from September 1943 to December 1943. I think there is nothing about him in this article. 217.96.180.64 (talk) 08:33, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish figter pilot.
Talk:Newry and Mourne District Council

message: The title of this page should be amended to read: "Newry and Mourne District Council"
Don't know how to make the change. Help anyone? Ardfern 18:32, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: '''Disambig alert'''
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Antifinnugor/Proposed decision

message: Would this edit count as a violation of the temporary injunction? Jayjg  | (Talk) 19:53, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That edit was at 18:40, 20 Jan 2005 - the injunction didn't formally come into effect until 19:02, 20 Jan 2005.  So, no, this was not a violation -- sannse (talk) 18:42, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: O.K.  Very close, though. Jayjg  | (Talk) 18:48, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Violation of temporary injunction?
Talk:Ostia (modern district)

message: Lido di Ostia is some distance from the Roman town of Ostia (Ostia Antica) as the seashore has receded in the last 2,000 years. The article seems to indicate that the modern and ancient Ostias are the same place. (unsigned, but by User: Exile, 20 Jan 2005)
:There are three places, not two, all some distance apart, and with very distinct histories: Ostia Antica (the large Roman city), Ostia (the mostly medieval village next to it, a sleepy place inhabited largely by airline stewards who find it convenient to the airport, although with a nice castle and the church where S. Monica was buried for over a thousand years before they moved her), and Lido di Ostia, a modern development which we owe to the recent fetish for ocean-bathing, and now somewhat notorious for its gay beach. See below. Bill 13:08, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Lido di Ostia

message: The article is related to Ostia Antica (the archeological site), 5 km away from Ostia (the modern city) and the sea. Mac9  (User: 205.223.229.203, 27 Oct 2005)
:What do you mean? Do you intend to write a separate article for Ostia? I too think there ought to be one, rather than the redirect, but just don't have the time to write it... Bill 13:03, 27 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ostia Antica

message: This is an interesting article, but some of it reads really weirdly; I suspect that it was either written or translated by someone with basic-to-intermediate command of English.  Any objections to the cleanup tag?  I'll take a crack at it as soon as my time permits. Dppowell 19:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I cleaned up general grammatical/structural issues, and I'll be willing to put in a bit more work on content, etc. when I have a bit more time to dedicate to the process. One thing: all of the parenthetical details are really irritating and make the page look terrible. I was trying to incoporate some of them into the text of the article, but if anyone else is interested in helping out with this, it would definitely be appreciated. MeredithParmer 01:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Joker

message: Should this article be merged with Joker (playing card)? (also placed message on other talk page) -Tim 12:22, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like this should go to Joker (disambiguation) due to the many different uses of the word —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Olsen (talk • contribs) 
As the two articles stand, they should certainly be merged. But there's not a lot of content in this one anyway. Another possibility would be to simply redirect it to Joker (disambiguation) but that has been tried. Andrewa 15:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging articles 

message: This page contained no unique information, so I deleted it and redirected to Jester. JohnnyMrNinja 07:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged
Talk:Kamae

message: Kamae applies to more than just karate.  It also refers to the positions taken in the traditional Japanese Martial Arts of Iaijutsu, Naginata-jutsu, Sojutsu, etc.  Also, kamae has sometimes been called gamae such as in the art of Kendo where all positions are called "kamae", except for the position of "waki".
: I might add kenjutsu as well.
: The pronunciation, BTW, of "gamae" depends on the word's placement after another word.
:Kortoso  (talk) 12:10, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Egyptians

message: Do series of numbered names of monarchs need to be included here in general? Or do we care about normal people. I'm referring specifically to the Ptolmy dynasty. --Alif 20:49, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ptlmy dynasty

message: I believe lists in general are not encouraged in Wikipedia, and specially lists of non-existant articles' titles. Maybe we should move the yet-to-be-created people articles' links into the bodies of their most appropriate categories pages, until they are created, then remove the "hard-links" from the categories' pages after the articles are started and categorised properly. This however, requires that the category heirarchy be tightened. --Alif 22:47, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Alif, the link you posted above "Lists Discouraged" does not work, and I can't seem to find the relevant link.  Can you please post the correct link?  I would be inclined to include monarchs here, since this is a list of famous Egyptians, not "famous non-monarch Egyptians".  Perhaps if there was some criteria for inclusion, some of the monarchs would drop off the list (although that might doom some "normal" people as well if we applied the criteria evenly).  I like your idea of only listing people who have articles on Wikipedia.  That would at least set an objective standard for who gets included.  The other people can be moved to the talk page to see if anyone is interested in creating an article for them.  Johntex 23:01, 26 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right; the link isn't wroking. In fact I can't remember what I wanted to link to at the time I wrote this, but I remember reading something to that effect, maybe on the mailing list, by Jimbo. Sorry. However, some guidelines regarding lists are: Wikipedia:Categories%2C_lists%2C_and_series_boxes#Lists and Wikipedia:List. --Alif 23:57, 14 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists Discouraged 

message: The "Thinkers, writers, and journalists" section needs some cleanup, either by removal of non-notable people or by separation of the 3 groups. 
This may apply for other sections as well.
--TheEgyptian 04:11, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I cleaned up the article. --Meno25 06:12, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: i would like to modify the titles on this page to make the beginning of each word in every title capital.
anybody disagree?
Abdallah 19:22, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Only proper nouns are capitalized on Wikipedia. See WP:CAPS. — [zɪʔɾɪdəʰ] · ☥ 20:38, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a not needed change. --Meno25 02:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proper Titles
Talk:Virtual studio

message: what about music virtual studios? --Abdull 13:01, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: added a link for that at the top (Virtual Studio Technology), hope that helps. Peter S. 21:16, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  music? 

message: I have removed the list of products/companies from External links as per the guidance of WP:ELNO and WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Please ensure you are aware of this guidance before being tempted to add similar spam type links.
Here is the removed list for reference purposes:
*For more details on the Virtual Studios of Virtual-Studio-Set.com go to: virtual-studio-set.com
*For more details on the Virtual Studio without video and audio delays of Hybrid go to:
*For numerous examples and video clips of virtual studios in action, visit Virtualsets.com, Inc.'s site go to: 
*For more details on the Virtual Studio of vr3 virtual production go to: 
*For more details  of virtualsets go to: Virtualsets also for examples of clips made.
*For more details on the Virtual Studio of Brainstorm Multimedia go to: 
*For more details on the Virtual Studio of NeuroTV go to: 
*For more details on the Virtual Studio of FOR-A go to: 
*For more details on the Virtual Studio of Vizrt go to: Virtual Studio @ Vizrt
*For more details on Vinten Radamec Virtual Tracking systems go to: 
*For more details about Orad's virtual studios and for examples of clips made from virtual studios go to: 
*For more details on the Virtual Studios of ChromaVault go to: ChromaVault
*For more details on the Virtual Studios of VirtualSetBackgrounds go to: Virtual Set Backgrounds
—Fæ (talk) 10:56, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam list
Talk:Mott's

message: According to accelerade's website, it is a Mott's product.  72.8.116.88 11:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  accelerade 

message: I've just removed a large amount of text which appears to be a more or less direct copy of the text found here and protected under the terms of use linked from that page, found here. This qualifies in my opinion as a copyright violation. The only direct copies of text allowed here are those released under either public-domain or GFDL, and even then they must have the source attributed. Franamax (talk) 07:45, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apparent copyvio 
Talk:Pythagoreanism

message: It claims 1st century Christianity was influenced by Platonism/Neopythagoreanism (does not distinguish between the two) twice, with no sources. The only first century Christian texts are the New Testament, Letter of Barnabas, and 1 Clement, which would relate more to Stoicism if anything. And proceeds to cite no Christian source prior to the Middle Ages (Pseudo-Dionysius - a neo-Platonist) except Clement of Alexandria on asceticism and the Sentences of Sextus (2nd century) on values. The only texts that reflect either the cosmological/numerological or ethical ideas of the neo-Pythagoreans come from the 2nd century (Gnostics like Valentinus, Marcion, etc; Clement of Alexandria, etc). So I've eliminated references to the first century until there's a source.Cornelius (talk) 01:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Influence on Christianity
Talk:Pocomoke City, Maryland

message: This page needs some attention, although the history appears sourced it should not be signed and needs to be more streamlined as to me it currently seems to contain much "waffle". I am unsure whether to attach the expert attention tag or not someone with greater knowledge of the area should perhaps make this decision.Bass fishing physicist 12:46, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsure

message: from a brief search, it seems that whether a populated area is considered one or the other depends less on size than on state law and local system of government. who knew? here's just one applicable link i've dug up: http://www.census.gov/population/censusdata/places/24md.txt.  - Metanoid (talk, email) 03:17, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But the census provides no rationale for their designations, and I can't find any place on wikipedia that states that a census "decision" is binding.  ANd as far as I know, Maryland doesn't distinguish one from the other.  But I'm double-checking . . .  Pilch62 (talk) 03:22, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't: From the Maryland Manual  Pilch62 (talk) 03:29, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Sweet. Yet another case where the Census Bureau classification does not accord with local statutes. This looks to be similar to the situation with California, where municipalities can style themselves as either cities or towns, but that styling is without any express distinction under state laws. See Article 23A Section 10 of the Maryland Code   older ≠ wiser 12:12, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Because no source has ever been provided that this is a town, I have reverted to the only sourced version: note that the Census Bureau did not collect data for a town under this name.  Nyttend (talk) 06:30, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is simply a lie--sources were provided to you.  If you revert these pages again, you will be reported for intentional vandalism. Pilch62 (talk) 04:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: My goodness, but you're dense.  The Maryland Legislature calls it a town--that's the ONLY source necessary.  Pilch62 (talk) 00:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town or city?
Talk:Eight-circuit model of consciousness

message: Right now, this article suffers severely from WP:PRIMARY. Here I will attempt to find some secondary sources which can provide context:
* article in media studies
* (note: conference proceeding)
* book on Leary
* article on ketamine 
* Psychedelics Encyclopedia (less than pleased that Andrew Weil wrote the Foreward, but... highly cited reference anyway).
* book on psychedelics
Not impressive, but giving a sense of the context, at least.
jps (talk) 11:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note that Robert Anton Wilson's book and work concerning and expanding on this model (as well as Ali's) are not primary sources to Leary's original model (they would, I'd think, be considered secondary and commentary). Randy Kryn (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a bit uncomfortable with using it as a reliable source for anything but the musings of Anton Wilson, but it does speak to the notability of the idea at least that the football was passed to another who is certainly famous in his own right. jps (talk) 18:39, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

text: I like  wplibrary for context. One brief mention in a flood of Leary concepts. All taken, saying 4 terrestrial and 4 post-terrestrial are about the extent of description in most good sources. fiveby(zero) 19:10, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on (probably book jacket) summations of this book here, perhaps this should be covered from a social science perspective. Reviews appear to be authored by university professors (Angela N. H. Creager and Fred Turner); two notable scientific journals (Science and Nature); as well as MIT News. Steve Quinn (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

text: In fact, I am guessing there would be enough notable coverage of the book, "Groovy Science," for a Wikipedia article. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 21:00, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

text: Here is an obit for Robert Anton Wilson in The Telegraph  to help determine his credibility as a consciousness researcher and theorist. Steve Quinn (talk) 21:12, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

text: I think Wilson, Alli, et al fall squarely in the realm of "adherents". JoelleJay (talk) 18:36, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: This is absolutely the correct viewpoint. GrandMote (talk) 21:55, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources