lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
File talk:Wonder Woman - Crosby.jpg

message: This image does not appear to be a screenshot. The quality, aspect ratio and other elements are more consistent with a promotional photo. Can you please attribute the source? Thanks. -Harmil 15:59, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Screenshot?

message: Like the subject line says...
Michael 03:11, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, can you cite a source? Did you download it from a Web site? Was it scanned from a magazine or poster? Who owns the copyright on the image and as of what date? This sort of information must be provided with images, and you have been told this repeatedly by many Wikipedians. Rather than just swimming against the current on Wikipedia, why not provide the information that the site's policies require? -Harmil 17:48, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a promotional Photo.
Talk:Fujian white crane kung fu

message: Fujian White Crane is a martial art style commonly placed in the 'category' Kung Fu. Today, there is a Fujian White Crane Kung Fu school thriving in Europe (namely the United Kingdom and Sweden) and growing under the instruction of a number of Instructors and Assistant Instructors. The head of this school is Mr Ngo Kah Swee, affectionately known as 'Dennis' to his students. The style that is taught is a mixture of both 'Tiger' and 'Crane' kung-fu styles, and was formerly known as Tiger-Crane Combination. The club has strong links with China, as the Chief Instructor Mr Ngo Kaw Swee has been officially commissioned by the Fujian Yongchun YiYun Wushu Society (China) to help with research into the history of the White Crane style.
Fujian White Crane Kung Fu is accepted as original and from the same lineage by Yongchun White Crane Wushu (China). It may be noticed that Yongchun is the area from which the name for the style 'Wing Chun' has been derived, although the two styles should not be confused or linked to one another directly.
----
Sources and Further Information:  , </br>JFD 16:10, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Previous version of this article
Category talk:Cycle races

message: I've seen that some year edition articles are included in this category, should all them be excluded? It looks like races with subcategories already included in Category:Cycle races such as Paris-Roubaix are not included but other races without a subcategory included in Category:Cycle races are categorised here. It also seems that in some cases that rule is not followed, see 2007 Eneco Tour of Benelux. Should we create categories for all races that have specific year articles? I hope you understand what I mean. Is there any Wikipedia guideline for this cases?.Drunt 11:43, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Specific year races included?

message: Perhaps this category should be merged with :Category:Cycling competitions? Littledogboy (talk) 15:01, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:2004 Australian Grand Prix

message: Hello everyone, I'm just letting you all know that I'm starting to fill in missing race reports in articles starting from all the Grands Prix I've watched in real-life - that's every race since this one. So, I'll start with this one. Lradrama 09:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Filled in the race report & added the infobox. Lradrama 09:57, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Did some references a few days ago. More might be needed. In time, to make it a really good article, maybe adding a more detailed section on qualifying would help, but for now, my next task is Malaysia 2004. :-) Lradrama 11:13, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: When I get time, I'll carry on this work. Next up is Sepang '04. Orphan Wiki 23:03, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race report 
Talk:Agaricus

message: The homeopathy claims in this article didn't appear to have any current notability - no source from this decade mentions it's use? PouponOnToast (talk) 00:38, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homeopathy 

message: Following the example of Cortinarius (and others), I'm moving the long list of Agaricus species to its own page. It's not terribly useful right now, but I'll have a go and see what I can do with it. This page could use a serious overhaul as well... time to do some reading! Sasata (talk) 05:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes

message: Speaking as an ignoramus, not even a novice, I see a substantial difference between the two pictures of specimens of Agaricus campestris in the article. The stipes are of relatively different thicknesses. Does this matter? Likely enough I am mistaken.
Sorry I haven't worked out how to show the pictures properly.Chjoaygame (talk) 18:01, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: pictures
Talk:Rotterdam Termination Source

message: It's not exactly scientific, but based on this  and the Guinness Book of Hit Singles  - and on the same page, Roxette's "Crash! Boom! Bang!" is listed with exclamation marks -  I believe that "Poing" does not have an exclamation mark. Someone could perhaps email the group; I don't speak Dutch. If you do email them, ask them if they still use the RTS name or are "Human Resource" instead.-Ashley Pomeroy 16:50, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi can someone tell me when Rotterdam Termination Source were founded please? I'm sure that I was hearing poing on mixtapes before 1992. I am thinking that I had poing, or at least the main sample loop, on a Carl Cox mixtape in October 1989, can this be possible?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.185.232.225 (talk) 10:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're mixing things up, I guess. Even if RTS was older than 1992, the track "Poing" is not. I'm Dutch myself and I believe that this track was released here in Holland first before unleashed to the rest of the world. It went up the charts in July 1992. Oxygene7-13 (talk) 19:49, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foundation date pls
Talk:Rich Dad Poor Dad

message: I dropped the following as it seemed notably off topic of the book. The song additionally doesn't appear to be all that notable -- not even mentioned in the Big K.R.I.T. page. There is also a problem with the link, and it is no longer online. It seems like if this should stay at all, it should be part of some sort of disambiguation.
Wyatt Childers (talk) 00:54, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big K.R.I.T. 

message: As I post this, the infobox in the article says that this book's publisher was Warner Books and the publication date was April 1, 2000. The article itself says that this book was self-published in 1997. Which is correct? --Rob Kelk 19:13, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy in publication information 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Quotes from the book. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:20, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Galactic corona

message: Perhaps the redirect should be switched, so that "Galactic corona" redirect to "dark matter halo" instead of the other way around. I've never heard the term "galactic corona" used, however the term "dark matter halo" is in common usage. Privong 16:58, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: i agree - corona is used about the spheroid - which is about 10^9 solar masses of stars - about 1000 times less massive than the DM halo. Boud 14:48, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks for switching that. Privong 18:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, this is to inform that this article has been translated into FR: and to thank all the contributors of the original article in english. Hop ! Kikuyu3 (talk) 20:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation to FR: 

message: Could someone add information on the composition of the gas and a citation? J Mark Morris (talk) 23:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What type(s) of gas?
Talk:Balance shaft

message: Some more hepl visualising second order vibrations would be handy. Even after looking at the diagrams, I still can't see how this force arises, and considering I'm a second year engineering student, I really should be able to.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.67.117 (talk) 17:00, 2005 August 4 (UTC)
The 'here' link to an animation appears to be dead -1st paragraph
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.152.173.149 (talk) 09:05, 2006 February 15 (UTC)
:to visualize the assymetry of a piston (compared to the sinusoidal motion with an infinitely long conrod) imagine the mathematically limiting (but physically impossible) case of the rod being the same length as the crank radius: for 180 degrees the piston moves at 2sin theta (crank = rod is the only situation you get a nice simple relation), and then for 180 degrees the piston is completely stationary. the general case is that in the lower half of travel, the piston moves down overly quickly and is then rather slow about entering and leaving the BDC position. with a pair of pistons 180 degrees out of phase, the upward motion (and hence acceleration) of one is not matched by the downward motion of the other, and this occurs twice per revolution (each piston has a turn travelling up); hence vibration is second order (2*f)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.175.57.184 (talk) 03:14, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Visualizing
Talk:Pirate radio in the United Kingdom

message: I've re-worked the majority of this article, in order to improve flow, remove a lot of content which whilst interesting doesn't meet Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View and is also largely unsourced. The sections had become a bit disparate, often repeating similar information in different places. Have now tried to consolidate all of this into the decade breakdowns, plus new small sections on the relationship between the internet and pirate radio which seems pertinent in this day and age, plus break down of cultural references to include documentaries also. Thanks to Stephen Hebditch whom I (unavoidably!) heavily reference on this, but his book and site is really the most definitive history of all things UK pirate radio land-based. Still plan to expand the 1990s section soon which is my own particular interest. Altlondon (talk) 13:20, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-work on article

message: I have no idea how to edit the big red box (Top-right) but Radio Invicta should be added to the list of pirate stations, and Radio Caroline should now be added to the list of 'Former pirate radio stations now licensed'. Deke42 (talk) 13:59, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: The big red box
Talk:SpaceDev

message: Need an update for SpaceDev losing the NASA COTS proposal.  Some, myself included thought they had a good chance to be one of the two winners (SpaceX and Rocketplane-Kistler).  Still, they have a pretty robust set of contracts, albeit mostly low dollar value. —Taka2007 05:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the article to reflect that it was not a Phase 1 winner, but it would be nice if someone could find an external reference that explicitly states that its proposal was rejected and some of the reasons for it. -- Bovineone 19:38, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: COTS

message: Perhaps the non-authored pages should be created or the wiki links removed.  There are several.
Spinlock55 (talk) 23:52, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Links to Non-Existent Pages
Talk:Queen's Park station (England)

message: Shouldn't there be some sort of disambiguation between this and Queen's Park (Glasgow)? 17:17, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Shaker scoop

message: (04.08.05) Added information on Chrysler's official title for this hood treatment along with the more popular usage by MoPar enthusiasts. -Vhostok
(2006.Jan.30) Since the phrase "Incredible Quivering Exposed Cold Air Grabber" exists nowhere else on the web (at least according to Google), it's difficult to believe Chrysler (or even Chrysler enthusiasts) have ever actually used it. Do you have a source for this, or is it hearsay, or is just something a clever auto journalist thought up? -aduthie
With regards to the statement that due to aerodynamics, the shaker scoop does little or nothing at all to improve performance, I'll leave this input...  The Fourth Generation Mustang GT, and Mustang Mach 1 have nearly identical 4.6 L V8 powerplants.  Yet somehow the Mach 1, with it's so called 'ineffective' shaker scoop performs a second faster than the GT in the quarter mile.  Of course this is just one example, I could name countless others, but this is evidence enough that the mentioned information is incorrect.
(2009.May.5) I Agree with this comment too , I own one they work really good to ram that cold air down the engines intake while still shaking with the engine movement.
except that the 4th generation mustang GT and the mach 1 do NOT have identical power plants. the GT uses the 2V 4.6L V8 rated at 260 hp, and the mach 1 used a 4V 4.6L V8 rated at 305 hp, accounting for the difference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.88.119.173 (talk) 00:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Juvenile hormone

message: My feeling is that this article should be a part of or well referenced by a new article devoted to Insect development; I've not the expertise to write this myself. Courtland 17:35, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
I added quite a bit about JH affecting development through insect instars - though I agree a general insect development article would be good. I don't know enough about insect development generally to start it really though I could contribute a bit about JH, PTTH, Ecdysone etc.. basically the hormonal bit! Speh 11:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does this hormone gets fragmented/broken by a thermal process (baking, grilling, boiling)? Because if no, this could be the reason for obesity. 87.78.23.209 (talk) 18:31, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thermal effect 
Talk:Postage stamp gum

message: I just deleted the phrase "should say more about modern self-adhesives, layers & chemical composition" from the main article. It doesn't belong. But I added it here incase someone wants to add that. Emfraser 17:46, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm pretty sure ungummed stamps were the norm in Brazil in the late 80s/early 90s. I recall every post office in Brazil had little jars of rubber cement available to glue stamps onto letters. This was not a temporary or emergency thing, as I recall; I guess it was simply a cost-saving measure.
:Scott catalog doesn't mention gumless stamps, but my personal collection for the period is all used, so can't tell that way. It's possible that the gum was of poor quality, so people got in the habit of supplementing it. Stan 05:31, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ungummed stamps? 

message: Haven't found any reliable source for that --Jbaranao (talk) 17:07, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  glue on Israeli postage stamps is certified kosher?
Talk:St. Joan of Arc Chapel

message: Is this the oldest non-native American building in North America?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.82.14.142 (talk) 09:17, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added it to List of the oldest buildings in the United States. Since it wasn't there previously, I can't say it's an exhaustive source. I would be interested in pursuing this research question further. - Paul2520 (talk) 18:41, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age Question 

message: My understanding is that the town where the Chapel originated is called Chasse, not Chassé ... Can anyone who knows more about French geography confirm (or refute!) this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.30.28.18 (talk) 15:40, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like this has been fixed. According to Chasse-sur-Rhône and Google Maps, you seem to be right. - Paul2520 (talk) 18:43, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Town of Origin's Name 

message: Should it not be made clear somewhere in the article that this building has positively nothing to do with the person of Jeanne d'Arc? It is my understanding that Jeanne never made it further south than the vicinity of Chinon. Unless I hear objections I will add such a disclaimer in a few days time. Krautkontrol 02:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Joan made it to Poitiers before she went to Orleans, but still, there does not seem to be clear evidence that Joan came to the chapel. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:46, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Joan of Arc chapel-2290483.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for August 16, 2020. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2020-08-16. Any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be made before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:30, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Joan of Arc chapel-2290483.jpg]] scheduled for POTD
Talk:Moveable bridge

message: In the list of bridge types, the one for Rolling Bridge goes directly (not as a redirect) to Pegasus Bridge, whose text describes it as a bascule, not rolling. Is this correct? --StarChaser Tyger 08:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the description of rolling bridge to reflect the type exemplified by the Pegasus bridge. This type does not remain horizontal as previously described, and "curling" is more descriptive of the other type sometimes described as "rolling". - Leonard G. 20:35, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling = Pegasus? 

message: This article claims that the George P. Coleman bridge is the largest with a movable section, but the article on the Lake Pontchartrain Causeway says it has a movable section, and this bridge is significantly longer.  Any objections to my removing this claim?  63.107.91.99 (talk) 21:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  George P. Coleman bridge? 

message: A punt (aka Cable ferry) is a bit like a Transporter bridge using cables to guide and power from one side to another, the main difference being that the punt is like a boat on the water rather than be elevated.
The cables provide something strong to pull on, and prevent the punt being washed away by the current.  The cables drop to the bottom of the stream away from the punt and do not therefore obstruct other river traffic.
A ferry is like a punt without the cables (a cableless-punt) and is essentially a boat.
Tabletop (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transporter bridge like punt or ferry. 

message: Although wholly unfit for a project of encyclopaedic nature such as Wikipaedia, I found it rather funny. Please stop. ZS 18:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who put a picture of Jeff Bridges in the gallery? 

message: I don't think this bridge fits into any of the existing categories. Unfortunately I don't know anything more about it.
http://frozenly.com/2009/12/flying-bridge/
Located in Leeuwarden, Netherlands at Latitude: 53.198310 Longitude: 5.765076
Blackskyshining (talk) 07:04, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Structurae defines it as a bascule bridge. I agree with that. It could be classified as a sub-type to the bascule since the hinge axis is at an odd angle. However, a reliable source should be found that defines that sub-classification before we do it. (i.e., If we create a classification here because it "looks different" to us, then that would be original research.) - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 04:57, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New type of moveable bridge?

message: "Movable bridge" is much more common than "Moveable bridge" - over 6 times in Google books.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.193.241.184 (talk) 07:56, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of this article should be changed.
Talk:Dolphin Inn, Plymouth

message: The TV feature has become an embarrasment for the pub actors and producers. This reference could be deleted witthout loss.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.157.102.181 (talk) 18:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless you can show some clear documented reason that mentioning it is in breach of, say WP:BLP guidelines, there is no reason to expunge reference to a TV show on grounds that some anon doesn't want it remembered. Gordonofcartoon (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Arundo

message: Just a question... where did you find this classification of the genus? GRIN says it has only two species, A. donax and A. pliniana. The link you cited seems to provide no informations. Carnby
:IPNI gives 311 names, including synonyms. JoJan 18:27, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: My references agree on 2-3 species; it is (unfortunately!) normal for conspicuous plants like these to pick up over a hundred synonyms each, mostly very obscure and never used by anyone other than the original author, but which have to be listed by IPNI - MPF 17:28, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

text: We incorporated the information on Arundo donax into a page on Arundo donax.--PBG250 00:04, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Ditto for the Arundo as a biofuel section. SheepNotGoats  (Talk) 19:41, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ditto (should that be tritto?) for the information about Alkaloids. Coverage in the Arundo donax article is better. Thomas Kluyver (talk) 14:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC)