Talk:Knoppix

message: Knoppix mostly consists of free and open source software, but also includes proprietary software
:The cite note [3] only specifies that exceptions to the rule of only having free software in the distrobution may be made if the license is "liberal" enough (ex, free distrobution of the binary). That doesn't seem to say that proprietary software is actually included.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.108.195.223 (talk) 09:21, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Knoppix

message: The page doesn't list this, but Knoppix 6.0.1 uses kernel version 2.6.28.4.  Should this be included?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.189.27.129 (talk) 16:28, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kernel version 

message: I moved the following section from the article. I see several issues with it, mostly being poorly useful, but someone may be able to address this and move back a modified section. The first issue is that copying the Knoppix folder to a partition is pretty much installing it. I can only see this procedure as useful in corner cases. Another issue about the rest of the section is that few systems have 1 GB of RAM. Finally, the fact that speed isn't a reason to use Knoppix doesn't mean that its speed doesn't matter. --Chealer 07:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This would be good to add into some subpage of a Wikibooks entry about Knoppix. -Mardus (talk) 17:46, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Optimizing Performance 

message: The cheat codes seem like a useful resource. Is having them listed a problem?
:I don't see why.  The description doesn't make too clear what they are, though; that's something that could be improved. -- Antaeus Feldspar 00:01, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's problematic and I'm moving them here. Having them forces to duplicate the maintainance of something which is much more manual material than encyclopedic material. Furthermore, they were very partial. Having an example may be acceptable. What was in the article follows.--Chealer 03:35, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheat Codes 

message: I'm not sure about the accuracy of the article concerning the recent addition of UnionFS to Knoppix and its effects.  The article states that changes can only be made to the boot media if it was written on a CD-RW or other rewritable media.  However, it was my understanding that one only needed the boot media to be multi-session-writable, and that at boot time the UnionFS would read all sessions and then boot the union of the filesystems contained therein.  Can someone confirm or deny this? -- Antaeus Feldspar 19:02, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think you can just burn Knoppix to a CD and leave the session open. I think Knoppix would have to be remastered to have this ability, like slax. After that would it still be Knoppix? But certainly you are correct in principle. Maybe somewhere else in the article there could be a mention of the ability to do this.--Tom harrison 21:59, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I updated the article and as well the article about the UnionFS file system and I hope that the passage outlines now the main use of it. (union of read-only file systems plus read-write filesystems; the DVD editions has two large read-only image files).  Hirzel 13:05, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  UnionFS and read-only media 

message: When creating a persistent home directory a file called knoppix.img is created. 
It is said to contain a EXT2 file system. Is this correct?
Is it possible to access this file system MSfrom Windows?
62.202.117.179 10:00, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persistent home (knoppix.img) 

message: :In the latest version of Knoppix the UnionFS filesystem even allows a user to write to the boot media (e.g., if Knoppix has been burned onto a CD-RW or DVD±RW).
Can someone provide a source for it? 'Cause I've googling to find some details and still can't figure out how. I've successfully booted from DVD-RW, made some changes to the system (like: new drivers, software). The changed files are visible on /ramdisk but now I can't save it. Something along the lines of
 growisofs -M /dev/hdc /ramdisk
complains that the medium is "not appendable". Did I burn the Knoppix image with bad options? Anyway, how can you burn to a medium that's still mounted? So, any Knoppix gurus around here? 'Cause this feature sounds great (if it's true that is)! --Misza13 (Talk) 15:26, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  UnionFS and writing to the boot medium 

message: Now since Cebit is Knoppix 5.0 available as "KNOPPIX_V5.0DVD-2006-02-25-DE.iso.torrent" and "KNOPPIX_V5.0DVD-2006-02-25-EN.iso.torrent". So s.b. could Update this page with screenshot and.... 
New in Knoppix is .... no I do not copy it here, Please look after on linux pages and with www search machines (par example google).
--138.89.56.7 19:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Now Knoppix 5.0 

message: Now Knoppix 4.0 is able to install additional SW and drivers on an a file on your computer, which is a kind of immage that works like an overlay above the DVD contents. With restrictions first statement is not always true.   
Point "engaged optical drive" is not at all correct. tohd and fromhd is described in next chapter. In some cases a work around is possible. 
The FAT 32 partition need not to be empty. It has to have only enough free space for the folder knoppix and a big file in the folder, which is not bigger than the DVD/CD image.
--138.89.56.7 19:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  corrections to Drawbacks of Knoppix 

message: Looking through this article, I see that it addresses the reader directly ("you can do this," etc.), contrary to the style required by a Wikipedia article. I'll put Template:Inappropriate person on it if nobody objects. 70.114.7.71 23:12, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've finished a complete review of the article, which should have solved this.--Chealer 01:47, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improper tone and such 

message: am i alone in thinking any subhead that begins with
 Although there is no data to base this claim on,
deserves no space on wiki? the fact is probably true, but it needs a citation. Kaini 02:58, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Knoppix#Popularity|Popularity]] 

message: I have removed this link as I saw some activity at  and . If you have evidence that this is indeed a dead distro no longer looked after, please provide specific evidence - ie changelogs that haven't been touched for a long time (ie several months) etc. I am happy to discuss, and put that line back in, but need specific evidence, because as far as I can tell it is still being maintained. Floorwalker 04:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead Distro?

message: Last year a free download version of Knoppix 5.2 (CEBit-version) was not available.
After the CEBit this year (2008) with version 5.3 Klaus Knopper has announced the download version 5.3.1. The "roadmap" of Knoppix 5.3.1 is here. --AlloG (talk) 07:52, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Knoppix 5.3.1 is "out" today. Download http://torrent.unix-ag.uni-kl.de/  It's too fresh to find any other Information now. Perhaps for further Information watch the Knoppix forums (e.g. on http://www.knoppix.net/)--AlloG (talk) 10:19, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Knoppix 5.3.1 is announced on knopper.net: http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/knoppix53-en.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlloG (talk • contribs) 10:08, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current versions - Update on Knoppix 5.3.1 status 

message: This article says that Knoppix requires "at least" 128k memory. Am I being dumb in thinking this is far too small a value? I read it as 128 meg before I double checked. IDX 20:42, 28 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Memory requirements 128k!? 

message: I've added a link to the Knoppix wiki to that list, but since I suspect it is likely to be the most up to date version, the section may be removed entirely. Any thoughts on this ? Comte0 17:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Knoppix Variations 

message: Adriane is not a recursive acronym. It might be a backronym. Can anyone verify? --Daev 15:21, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adriane Knoppix acronym 

message: There is no info in the article about 5.2, that was released in CEBIT 07  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ManoloKosh (talk • contribs) 10:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  5.2 release 

message: Some one added just one word into the article to change it's meaning: "Knoppix is a dead Linux Distribution...". I don't know if it's really dead, it's just a very long time since they released a new version. Can someone clarify on this? --Bruin_rrss23 (talk) 03:50, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I am confused as well about the rumored "death." I have been using the Knoppix Live DVD for a while now (when it comes in handy to have a boot disc, that is). I only just visited the article to see if there was any news. I couldn't find anything on knoppix.net, knoppix.org, or knopper.net. I admit that I might have missed something, but if that is the case, the news of the death of Knoppix isn't exactly the most widely broadcasted news out there. When I search google for "knoppix dead" I get articles and forums that go back as far as 2003, which is just out of the known scope. We need something more recent, and not just rumors. --Trakon (talk) 09:20, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is Knoppix DEAD?! 

message: Can we please compile a list of the version history into a similar table?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ubuntu_(Linux_distribution)&oldid=203271934#Releases
Altonbr (talk) 03:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Version history 

message: I edited the Ubuntu reference but then I removed because it's unrelated to Knoppix. Not sure what is/was the rationale for having it on the 'see also' section. By the way, I don't follow the Knoppix realease history but it looks like version 5.3 is out and there is no reference in the article about it: http://www.knopper.net/knoppix/knoppix53-en.html Universalcosmos (talk) 16:06, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  new version and ubuntu 

message: In Knoppix#Versions I changed the sentence to read as follows.
As of April 2008, from version 4 up until 5.1.1, Knoppix has been split into a DVD "maxi" edition (with over 9GB of software), and a CD "light" edition, both developed in parallel,Index of ftp://ftp.uni-kl.de/pub/linux/knoppix/ (latest CD version was KNOPPIX_V5.1.1CD-2007-01-04-EN.iso) after 5.1.1 only the DVD version is available.
I also added the html comment "please update this if newer CD version becomes available."
This is supported by Klaus Knopper's statement here: "Not started yet, probably after release date of DVD".-84.222.17.27 (talk) 20:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Versions - CD development no longer in parallel 

message: I think that perhaps large sections of this need to be reworked due to recent Knoppix developments related to the vast differences between the CD and DVD versions, which have become more and more divergent. I think a basic reader would get the impression that the current cd version is just a limited version of the full DVD version- ie basically the same with core functions, but the DVD just has more apps. However, the two versions now use different desktop managers (KDE vs LXDE), different browsers/file managers, etc. The actual differences aren't really alluded to until the Versions section, well into the article, while the Contents section practically implies that KDE is the default desktop for all versions of Knoppix. That was once the case, but not anymore.
I don't really have a thorough enough knowledge to correct these issues, but thought it should be brought to light. It's worth noting that this is a general problem in the Knoppix community- finding information about the new CD version can be difficult. But if anyone is up to the task, I think it would be helpful.
Canjecricketer (talk) 18:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify CD - DVD differences earlier 

message: == Historical significance ==
I think Knoppix's automatic hardware detection and configuration was a really massive contribution to the usability of Linux.  Was there anything else that did insane things like boot directly into X without any user intervention before Knoppix?  I know there were a couple times I booted off a Knoppix CD just to get the information to configure another distro, before the major distros started adding Knoppix's auto-detection.  —Darxus (talk) 17:36, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New discussions

message: I think Knoppix's automatic hardware detection and configuration was a really massive contribution to the usability of Linux.  Was there anything else that did insane things like boot directly into X without any user intervention before Knoppix?  I know there were a couple times I booted off a Knoppix CD just to get the information to configure another distro, before the major distros started adding Knoppix's auto-detection.  —Darxus (talk) 17:36, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical significance 

message: This talk page is truly bizarre, it seems as though someone moved new discussions to the top a few years ago, against WP:TALK recommendations, and new talk appears at the top and the bottom now! 65.94.69.242 (talk) 12:14, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk Page

message: I have been working on a Linux Users Group resource page and need some
 conformity of all the Wiki Linux versions and distributions. Debian has an
 excellent template and I have made an RSS reader to pluck version data from
 the wiki page. Would be nice if I could get all of them to follow this method
 and my page could keep up to date with all the latest versions.  
 RSS source path
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Latest_stable_software_release/Debian&feed=rss&action=history     
 RSS Template.
 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Latest_stable_software_release/Debian&action=edit  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icarusfactor (talk • contribs) 02:41, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latest Version Layout 

message: I propose that the talk section Old Discussions (or most parts of it) should be archived, given that its presence and placement in the talk page as it currently is may appear confusing. -Mardus (talk) 17:48, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should old discussions be archived? 

message: I've updated hardware requirements to be slightly more realistic. The official minimum system requriements are very outdated (the page itself was last updated on 17.06.2008).
I've updated the graphical requirements part to a minimum 256 Mb of RAM, as 128 M is very borderline and allows only entering LXDE in Knoppix 6.0 and that's that. Even if a swap file or partition might help out in a system with just 128 Mb RAM, then I still won't recommend it to anyone. The current requirements recommendation is thus based on a user not being able to use swap at all. -Mardus (talk) 18:14, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Hardware requirements

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Knoppix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080612030833/http://www.efytimes.com/efytimes/fullnews.asp?edid=17094 to http://www.efytimes.com/efytimes/fullnews.asp?edid=17094
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified