Talk:New feminism

message: The lede's second paragraph merely restates difference feminism generally, much as the first paragraph does, when it should distinguish itself from other forms of difference feminism. As I read the article (I haven't read sources for this and I'm not expert in this movement), because the modern (not historical) form is largely supported by the Roman Catholic Church, the major distinction is that it reinforces the role of women as mothers, because it accepts the Church's position that women have no right to choose whether to be mothers or not, and it views the differences as primarily biologically, not primarily culturally, driven. I propose to add to the lede, probably editing the second paragraph to the following:
New feminism, as a form of difference feminism, supports the idea that men and women have different strengths, perspectives, and roles, while advocating for the equal worth and dignity of both sexes. Among its basic concepts are that the most important differences are those that are biological rather than cultural, and that women's obligation is to give birth to and raise children, and therefore that reproductive choice must be opposed.
Thank you. Nick Levinson (talk) 03:58, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Thanks. Nick Levinson (talk) 01:40, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  propose rewriting lede's 2d paragraph 

message: The article reads as if it was written by a fervent supporter of New Feminism. The principles of the movement should be presented more succinctly and precisely in less grandiose and rhetorical language.
Yeah, if a woman is obedient to and dependent on a man, THAT IS NOT EQUALITY IN ANY WAY! There does NOT have to be "one leader", do these people think we're still living in an absolute monarchy?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.222.10.96 (talk) 08:10, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutral Point of View? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on New feminism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070205140354/http://www.columbia.edu:80/cu/augustine/arch/frear/hildebrand.htm to http://www.columbia.edu/cu/augustine/arch/frear/hildebrand.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:21, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I feel a distinction between this religious form of "new feminism" and the other form of new feminism aka third-wave feminism needs to be made. Heyates14 (talk) 02:57, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a good idea and I added a template to that effect (and you should feel free to do similar or more extensive editing yourself). It is possible that it will be challenged, in which case a source will be needed, a source that says they're not the same thing or that what this article discusses is only a subset of a larger feminism, with the sourced content to be added to the body and the content probably added to the lead. Nick Levinson (talk) 05:22, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New feminism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070820081940/http://www.thenewfeminism.net/ to http://www.thenewfeminism.net/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on New feminism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605003057/http://www.catholiceducation.org/links/search.cgi?query=feminism&mh=25&type=keyword&bool=and to http://www.catholiceducation.org/links/search.cgi?query=feminism&mh=25&type=keyword&bool=and
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)