lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eden Capwell and Cruz Castillo

message: I have begun work on changing this article and making it more neutral by rephrasing some of the more subjective praises of A Martinez's and Marcy Walker's acting abilities (Yes I agree that they are exceptional actors, but you have to make the praise of them more neutral by saying things like " A Martinez and Marcy Walker were praised for their acting ability during such and such a storyline", rather than "A. Martinez and Marcy Walker showed their amazing acting ability during such and such a storyline". I have not finished yet though. Dippit 12:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: oh and even though the final two paragraphs are not really in keeping with the tone of Wikipedia (I strongly suspect it is the final two paragraphs that got the article tagged to be checked for neutrality) I will leave them here to see what others want to do with them. Dippit 13:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Thomas Crecquillon

message: ""Thomas Crecquillon." The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians, ed. Stanley Sadie. 20 vol. London, Macmillan Publishers Ltd., 1980."
20 volumes. Which volume and which pages? Schissel | Sound the Note! 11:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Very  interesting word! I remember a nice little opera by Richard Wagner with the german name 'Fliegender Holländer'
Translate it to English and it will get the name 'Flying Netherlandsman' ? Whoops, sounds a little bit strange!
Never heard before. So please take an oldfashioned dictionary and the problem will be solved immediately:
'The flying d....man'. Heureka.
 
--Metzner (talk) 18:25, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Netherlandish ?
Talk:Francis Burchell

message: Subject of article is an Olympic gold medalist, surely this is notable enough? Andrew nixon 13:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose that it is notable enough, however, the article needs to say this to establish his notability.  I've added it in and removed the speedy deletion tag.  -- DiegoTehMexican 13:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough. I'll make sure to include mention of the gold medal when I do the other players on the team! Andrew nixon 13:17, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Modern-Satanism

message: Original satanism is now under satanism.
since the church of satan and their beleifs are modern and has NOTHING to do with Original satanism, it should be here, classified as modern-satanism.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Veltiis (talk • contribs) 
These articles (Satanism and Modern-Satanism appear contradictory / confused. They should either be renamed (e.g. Satanism (religion), Satanism (movement), [[Modern satanism movement) or merged.) The disambiguation page is also ambiguous. -Tiswas(t/c) 14:52, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

message: This version which I have just changed to a redirect seemed to be little more than a copy and paste of this state of the satanism article. A fork needs:
* discussion first at talk:satanism
* the title modern Satanism - there is no need for an hyphen.
-- RHaworth 17:56, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  fork
Talk:Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences

message: Cadets at service academies are not paid the equivalent of Sergeant(E-5) pay.  They are paid less than $900 per month, below E-1 pay, and a substantial amount of that is subtracted for uniforms, ending in as low as $110 per month in their first year of school.  Check the military pay tables, they list cadet pay.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.192.0.4 (talk) 00:31, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I realize the text is probably released as US gov't, but the tone of this just seems unencyclopedic:
"For over 25 years, the Daniel K. Inouye Graduate School of Nursing (GSN) has worked to achieve our mission of providing the nation with the highest quality advanced practice nurse clinicians, scientists and scholars uniquely prepared to lead in Military and Federal healthcare systems. " Thoughts?       StarM 03:45, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tone? 

message: Not sure if Sean is actually notable, but fyi
    According to a CNN report, "Sean Conley was seen departing the White House alongside Trump" on January 20, 2020.   
    The Associated Press reported that Conley would be taking on a "teaching role" at the Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences.  
Peter K Burian (talk) 19:27, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pres. Trump's doctor will be teaching here soon
Talk:What Is to Be Done? (disambiguation)

message: See my comments on What is to be Done?. PatGallacher 13:26, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The three books referenced here have the same source of inspiration for the title in the Bible (Luke 3:10-14). Should we add also a link to it? Quoting here the Wikisource version for convenience:
10“So what do we have to do?” the crowds asked him. 
11“If you have two coats, give one to the person that doesn’t have any, and if you have food, do the same,” he told them. 
12Some tax collectors came to be baptized, and they also asked him, “Teacher, what do we have to do?” 
13“Don’t collect any more tax than you should,” he told them.
“What about us?” asked some soldiers. “What do we have to do?” 
14“Don’t demand money with violence, don’t blackmail people, and be satisfied with your wages,” he told them.
--QuimGil (talk) 18:45, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linking to Wikisource for the original quote?
Talk:Bukit Timah Primary School

message: less lists, more text, pics and refs Victuallers 09:53, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: assess
Talk:Umbrella Murder

message: This is topical and notable, but I feel that the man and the assassination attempt should be listed together. perfectblue 13:33, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are somehow right, but many people have heard about the umbrell murder without knowing it was Markov, and Markov is know by himself. Maybe then, removing some of the part in the Markov document is the best idea and link it to the umbrell mureder page. If you google for umbrella murder, it is hard to find the page information on Markov Wikipedia. So I still think it is valuable to have it separated. --Jujucoucou2 08:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Songkok

message: the white peci (which is worn by haji) is not Indonesian cap. it is from arab, and they have different designs, usages, and compositions. compare these pics: 
 and 
:Peace. --Nielswik(talk) 13:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has Malaysian slant, but I think it is clearly described that songkok/peci is South East Asian. The Malaysian stub mark can be removed when the article is expanded enough. Gombang (talk) 06:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comment

message: This article needs better historical sources.  The fez was only adopted by the Ottomans in the 1820's, so the newspaper article claiming it is the origin of the songkok and also that the songkok has been around since the 13th century is contradictory. --Macrakis (talk) 18:02, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Maico

message: Maico also built small cars in 1955-58. See:  http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maico
Sca (talk) 14:50, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cars
Talk:ZF Sachs

message: * See Combining of articles under Sachs Motorcycles Dbratland (talk) 03:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Ben's Cookies

message: This entry is just blatant advertising for a shop.
In fact I think that the entry is quite factual.  Can you be more specific on what part you feel is advertising? M stone 18:16, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are no references in this article, and I am wondering whether the Saudi Arabia stores are legitimate. There's nothing on the internet of new Ben's Cookies stores opening up there; in fact, the only results turned up by a Google search are dubious themselves. I searched for "ben's cookies" + saudi arabia, and the only relevant results looked as though they'd taken their information from Wikipedia, anyway.
Can anybody help with this? The Baroness of Morden (talk) 10:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-UK locations
Talk:Woodstock Express (Kings Island)

message: Going to reopen this page. user  has info that will make this a notable ride article.--Nickvet419 (talk) 19:03, 21 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I added what I could dig up. I think there is enough here to keep this open as a separate page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JlACEer (talk • contribs) 21:14, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is good work.  I brought this up on the Kings Island talk page shortly after the page was changed to a redirect months ago, but never got around to restoring it.  I felt some of the original content should be restored and made the change, but if you want to continue improving on that section, please feel free to do so.  The article seems to be more in-line with WP's notability guidelines now.  Thanks for the help!  GoneIn60 (talk) 11:05, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  reopening page
Talk:Formula Palmer Audi

message: The article includes an out-dated logo.  The one shown was used up to and including the 2008 season.  From 2009, its colours have changed noticeably, and so a new image needs uploading, rgds.  78.32.143.113 (talk) 16:08, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Out-dated logo
Talk:Almond (town), Wisconsin

message: What's the difference between this and Almond, Wisconsin? And if there is a difference, is there not a better name for this page?--
 AM666999 talk   19:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The village and town of Almond are two separate municipalities. Please read Political subdivisions of Wisconsin=thank-RFD (talk) 01:13, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Promises! Promises!

message: Near the beginning the article says the film had a budget of $200,000. But near the end it says that Mansfield's $150,000 salary was half of the film's budget. So was the budget $200k or $300k? --Kitsunegami (talk) 06:45, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Budget Discrepancy

message: The article had the following in earlier versions:
*Mansfield received $150,000 for her role (half of the film's budget) and 10% of the film's profits.
*The reviews included Los Angeles Herald-Examiner writing - "The film is a bust",Los Angeles Herald-Examiner,  and Variety writing - "The only excuse for this shabby self-propelled contrivance is that obviously there is an audience waiting to devour it."Variety, 
I have removed both, because neither could be verified. Can someone help with these? I still believe there's some amount of useful fact there. Aditya(talk • contribs) 02:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help needed 

message: "...though had the unfinished Something's Got to Give, which starred Marilyn Monroe, been released in 1962 as planned, it would have been entitled to claim that distinction."
And, if wishes had been horses, as planned, then pigs would fly. It's nice that Hollywood and Marilyn had an equally-important movie planned, but that's not an excuse for distracting from the importance of this film.
Whbjr (talk) 00:25, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jayne is not Marilyn 

message: "...had to fly in Jet Fore..."? That just looks so funny! So that is not an airplane? 🤔 LeoStarDragon1 (talk) 10:37, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Jet Fore. Not an RS, but you get an idea.  Aditya(✉ • ⚒) 17:20, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Is that a real person's real name?" 

message: I have removed the bolded sentence from the Reception section:
"Chicago Sun-Times movie critic Roger Ebert wrote, "Finally, in 'Promises, Promises' she did what no Hollywood actress ever does except in desperation: she made a nudie. By 1963, that kind of box office appeal was about all she had left." Despite Ebert's claim, seven years after Mansfield's groundbreaking move, major female Hollywood stars were doing nude scenes in Hollywood productions.[citation needed]"
It appears that the person who added it is under the mistaken impression that "making a nudie" means appearing nude in a movie. It is a specific reference to cheapo sexploitation pictures.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soulnus (talk • contribs) 05:12, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That was the right thing to do. A prejudiced and unsubstantiated claim has no place in Wikipedia. Aditya(✉ • ⚒) 09:15, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ebert
Talk:Arbor Vitae, Wisconsin

message: Would someone be kind enough to update the demographic and population statistics per the 2010 census?CircuitChild (talk) 15:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
Category talk:Audiobooks

message: Category has been created to group articles describing or related to audio books, as this appeared to be a missing sub-cat of :Category:Books by type.
At creation time, only one entry had been included: The Railway Stories describes the audio-book releases of the Rev. W Awdry's original 'Thomas' books (The Railway Series).  It really doesn't fit into any other book-type cat.  I'm sure there must be other articles covering audiobook releases of printed works, and this is the place for them!
However, having trawled around links from audio books, there would appear to be a number of articles relating to audio books, such as publishers and broadcasters, which also fit neatly in this cat. (So they have been added.)
NOTE - the category was not intended to include 'all books that have been released as audio books'.  That would require a new cat such as Books released as audio books, to match the equivalent :Category:Books available as e-books.
EdJogg 15:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category Membership
Talk:Baldwin (town), Wisconsin

message: Could anyone probably explain the mystery of Baldwin the town, smaller than Baldwin the village, partially located within each other? --87.234.145.107 (talk) 18:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Village & Town. Huh? 
Talk:Bangor (town), Wisconsin

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 17:14, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Case-hardening

message: What is sorbitizing
:My first guess is that it's treatment with sorbic acid, which looks like it would infuse carbon into the surface of the object being treated.  I'll do some more digging and see what I can find.  scot 15:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sorbitizing

message: Is the chemical "reaction" described in this section really correct?  Case hardening is a similar process to the production of blister steel.  Since all materials are in the solid state there is no means by which CO could diffuse into iron, and no means of it being persuaded to lose its oxygen when it arrived.  My understanding of the process is that the migration took place entirely in the solid state.  My assumption is that vibrating carbon atoms became detached from the charcoal and incorporated into the iron.  Such high temperature solid-state processes are not within the sort of chem,istry that I was taught either at school or university.  If this section is not to be deleted it needs to cite some reliable source.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it's right. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:22, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry: dubious tag 

message: If the chemistry section isn't in reference to carburizing, then what process is it? Wizard191 (talk) 01:45, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry section 

message: A nit here.  Ferrocyanides are not "potentially toxic cyanide compounds" - they are essentially nontoxic both in vivo and in the environment.  Addition of strong acids cat cause release of actually toxic hydrogen cyanide gas.  The reason that ferrocyanides were used in the first place was because potassium cyanide - which case hardens really well btw - is in fact quite toxic. See ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scan/out70_en.pdf‎ about cyanoferrates. Norm Reitzel (talk) 21:33, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the phrase "such as ferrocyanide". The ferrocyanide article gibes with what you said. I left the rest of the sentence alone on the fair chance that it may be accurate (newer formulas less toxic than older ones), especially since it has refs, but it would be good if anyone could knowledgeably say which specific molecules made the old formulas more toxic. — ¾-10 01:25, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ferrocyanide
Talk:Beaver Brook, Wisconsin

message: If a town of nearly 33 sq mi needs to have its coordinates repeated, shouldn't those two sets of coordinates be the same? Topeka Sam (talk) 02:03, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Template talk:Discworld

message: While it is true that some books have been illustrated, and others have been classified as young adult, I don't think these distinctions are large enough to justify the extra space (mostly white) that they require in the template (and every page the template is on).  Perhaps on this template, these books can be merged into the general list?  The Gomm 23:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have made it so, and I've added the short stories.Eldestone 11:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  remove headings for 'illustrated' and 'young adult' 

message: *Lie-to-children
I've added an entry for Lie-to-children, first introduced as a phrase in The Science of Discworld.
If you've got recommendations for additional secondary sources that could be utilized to further improve the quality of the article, please suggest them at Talk:Lie-to-children.
Thank you for your time,
— Cirt (talk) 02:31, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added one entry - Lie-to-children 

message: Sorry to be a bother, but should the Discworld template have so many entries for 'Races and Creatures'? The only one that refers to an individual article is 'Nac Mac Feegle', while all others link to Discworld (world). Also, while Dragons, Dwarfs, Elves, Orcs, Goblins, Igors etc. all have Discworld books centred around them, Centaurs, Fauns, Gnolls, Gorgons, and Kvetch are all only briefly mentioned as one-off jokes; we never actually encounter a named character from one of these races. (I am working from the Discworld & Pratchett Wiki here). Doesn't having all of these ephemeral references confuse the Template, especially when the article they link to doesn't mention them? OldSwinburne (talk) 19:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Races and Creatures
Talk:Crimewatch/Archive 1

message: These are an archive of the discussions from when the article was located at Crimewatch UK
"inviting viewers to be armchair detectives"
I don't like that line. It's not a "who dunnit", and people aren't presented with the evidence. They are usually just given a little background and asked to phone in if they were there, or if they've seen someone. It doesn't require any amount of detective work
Timb0h 14:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Nick Ross announced on the BBC web site he would be stepping down from the show. In passing, he quoted a one in five solution rate, not one in three as mentioned in the text. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6767463.stm Rob Burbidge 14:18, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nick Ross leaving / Percentage of solved cases 

message: There are a dozen places in this article, as it stands, that need citation from someplace else than the BBC, which produced the program. (What seem to be) facts are mixed with a whole range of speculative material, and what is apparently self-advertising. The peacock language, such as "was for so long strongly identified", "insistent on a strong public service remit" to "few programmes in which the BBC do not 'credit squeeze'" emphasizes that the article is not being careful to stick with verifiable facts.
67.169.126.106 (talk) 21:44, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations much needed
Talk:Birchwood (town), Wisconsin

message: Shouldn't the coordinates actully be for the town and not for the village? Topeka Sam (talk) 19:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:Krøderen Line

message: Moving the article to Krøderen Line at some point would probably be a good thing. Arsenikk (talk) 14:10, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, much better grammar (in English). Will do when I've finished the expansion. --Eisfbnore talk 14:18, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been moved. Arsenikk (talk) 21:35, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: What radius are the 16 sharp curves on this line? Tabletop (talk) 13:33, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sharp Curves?
Talk:Norman Bentwich

message: This is not ok at the moment:
:
The reason is that this primary source needs to be connected to the topic of the article, and the matching name is not enough. If it wasn't for the "OBE MC", I'd delete it. Is this episode mentioned in a biography? Why was he cashiered? Zerotalk 03:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I am looking for a Reliable Source but it seems he took home some secret documents (re Operation Torch) and lost them. Nedrutland (talk) 07:54, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There is an account (apparently) in his autobiography and a paper "The Prof, The Charwoman, The TORCH plans and The court‐martial: Flying officer Bentwich's Nemesis" by G. Rubin, in The RUSI Journal 2008.  Nedrutland (talk) 08:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:   Great, I have the article. Zerotalk 08:40, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  If you don't have access to the article, send me mail and I'll give you a copy. I also notice that the UK National Archives have a file declassified in 2014 and not used by Rubin. Zerotalk 09:38, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsatisfactory 1942-3 content
Talk:Glider (sailplane)/Archive 1

message: I've also been working on reconsiling Gliding and Gliders with Motor glider. I have moved most of the motor glider specific content there. I also agree that all of these overlapping articles need to be organized and expanded.   
Dhaluza 20:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome to Wikipedia, Amos.  Personally, I think we should try to keep the glider and gliding articles as distinct as possible, with a minimum of repetition, and I feel that descriptions of lanunch methods belong in the gliding article rather than here.  Car-towing (aka auto-towing) is mentioned in the gliding article, but it could certainly use some more detail.  Please don't feel you have to ask permission from anybody to edit any article - if you want to add more information or change something just go for it.  That's the Wikipedia spirit, as I understand it.  If you feel like it, you could read the Wikipedia:Help pages first, but I'd recommend you just to get stuck in.  One tip - use the "Show preview" button.  I remember when I was new here it took me a while to notice that it even existed!  All the best.  GrahamN 00:50 16 Jun 2003 (UTC)
----
(moved comment to talkpage of Military gliders) Muijz 14:32, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

message: The word sailplane is used repeatedly in the article, although searching on 'sailplane' on wikipedia brings you here. Shouldn't it be enough to mention at the start of the article that gliders and sailplanes are the same thing and then use the word 'glider' after that. It just seems a little confusing. ahpook 17:14, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sailplane vs. Glider