Talk:Mac OS 8

message: I've removed the comment about Kaleidoscope being spawned by Mac OS 8.5. Kaleidoscope pre-dated Mac OS 8.5 by just over two years, and may have been one of the reasons themes were dropped. I remember that there was a controversy because Apple at one point demonstrated a Kaleidoscope theme importer. --Steven Fisher 01:51, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaleidoscope 

message: The article said that the nanokernel was introduced in 8.6 but I don't believe this is true. The nanokernel has been around since at least OS 8.1. The nanokernel is an integral part of the boot sequence for NewWorld architecture machines. The first NewWorld machine was the iMac 233 which shipped originally with OS 8.1. This would suggest that the nanokernel existed in 8.1.
The iMac 233 was able to run a retail copy of Mac OS 8.5 - suggesting that the retail version of 8.5 included a nanokernel.
Here is a developer reference for the PowerMac G3 (Blue & White).
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Hardware/Developer_Notes/Macintosh_CPUs-G3/PowerMacintosh_G3/PowerMacG3.65.html#pgfId=3432
This article has the following quote.
"The previous version of the NanoKernel has code that is processor-specific to create data structures. With the NewWorld architecture, the Trampoline code creates these data structures from information in the Open Firmware device tree."
This suggests that the nanokernel was around post-NewWorld architecture. Also, the Blue & White originally shipped with Mac OS 8.5.1 and so this would suggest that the nanokernel was present. This article was last updated in January 1999, around 4 months before 8.6 was introduced.
Here is an article describing the NewWorld boot sequence.
http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Hardware/DeviceManagers/pci_srvcs/pci_cards_drivers/PCI_BOOK.4b.html
Note that in the article the nanokernel was mentioned and this article was last updated in March 1999, 2 months before 8.6 was released.
All reference material on the Apple Developer Connection regards NewWorld and the kernel refers to it being a nanokernel. The only sites I've seeing referring to a nanokernel as being something completely new in 8.6 are non-Apple sites. Many of them are Wikipedia pages or pages where text has clearly been borrowed from Wikipedia.
Mac OS 8.6 definitely introduced changes to the nanokernel but I think it's wrong to say that the nanokernel was first introduced in 8.6. The MP Nanokernel was introduced in 8.6, not the concept of the Nanokernel. See this article for more details.
http://developer.apple.com/qa/hw/hw63.html
This article from 1998 also refers to a nanokernel
http://developer.apple.com/technotes/tn/pdf/tn1094b.pdf
I could be horribly wrong here so would appreciate someone with some more real-world low-level developer knowledge confirming or correcting this.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thepreacher (talk • contribs) 18:16, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monolithic or nanokernel? 

message: I don't think the current introduction properly summarizes the history and significance of Mac OS 8. Here are the main points I think need to be addressed:
* The most apparent change to the system was the adoption of the Platinum theme
* Early versions (8.0 and 8.1) support the 68040 processor, however 8.5 required a PowerPC processor
* Mac OS 8 revitalized interest in the Mac platform, introducing many technologies which were being developed for Copland (which was originally intended to be Mac OS 8.) This allowed the Mac platform to remain viable as Apple developed Mac OS X.
The fact that Copland is currently omitted from the article is huge! This was Apple's biggest stumbling block for years. Copland was originally planned as Mac OS 8, and the Mac OS 8 we now know was in direct response to the failure of Copland. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zachlutz (talk • contribs) 21:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool.  Please source your edits though, per Wikipedia:Attribution  AlistairMcMillan 22:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Planning Revision to Introduction 

message: This probably doesn't deserve it's own section heading, seeing that it was such a minor update and the content is limited to a single sentence. If there are no objections, I'd like to merge it into the 8.5 section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zachlutz (talk • contribs) 10:18, March 30, 2007
The actual story of Mac OS 8.5.1 is that coincident to Apple released Mac OS 8.5 users started to experience hard drive corruption and failure. Most failures were in “clone” macs from other licensed vendors. Many hundred hard drive failures were analyzed by Apple and third party vendors. Most failures were attributed to actual drive failures as many clone systems came with hard drives made by mfgs not certified by Apple. However, the software team worked fervently to locate any possible software issues that might contribute to the failures, over a dozen “possible” issues were found, though only one or two were actually thought to have caused any issues. The code name was “        “ (eight spaces) as a way of keeping the code name secret. There were no written explanations that I can cite, just personal memory’s as I participated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave d west (talk • contribs) 19:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  8.5.1 

message: I'm not sure where others stand on this, but I have no problem with allowing both notations of HFS+ and HFS Extended in this article. As far as I'm concerned, they're interchangeable. I would like to see HFS+ denoted as such, however, as opposed to HFS Plus, because, as far as I can tell, that isn't an official notation.
Zachlutz 11:53, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Apple uses "HFS Plus" on the official technote. AlistairMcMillan 11:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  HFS+/Extended Notation 

message: Didn't Mac OS 8.6 introduce USB support to the Macintosh? And if not, why do all those USB peripherals always say "requires Mac OS 8.6+?" Thanks. ---Ransom (208.25.0.2 21:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  USB 

message: Hi, I was just browsing here and there and fell upon the Mac OS 8 page, and after seeing the screenshot of 8.1 immediately thought "I have the OS 8.0 CD here, I could change the screenshot to 8.0!"
You could then move the existing 8.1 shot down the page, to the actual 8.1 section.
Just a thought. Oh, and since I've never done anything like this before (this is indeed my 2nd "contribution" to Wikipedia) I'd appreciate a link on how to update/change/whatever-is-applicable the image(s).
PS. Please note that although I have the 8.0 CD, it was given to me by a friend (I'm slightly interested in Mac history) however I don't actually own a *real* Mac so I'd be running the CD on my PC using Basilisk II or SheepShaver. Just so you know. *doesn't mention where he got the ROMs from*
Dav7 03:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Screenshot improvements 

message: There ought to be a mention of CarbonLib, the set of APIs and libraries that replaced the old toolbox system calls.  The purpose was to eliminate hardware dependencies, eliminate the practice of applications accessing private system data structures, and provide forward-compatibility to future versions of the operating system.  I don't recall which version of 8.x it was introduced, but it was a significant transition between the classic MacOS and MacOS X.
68.191.177.126 (talk) 11:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  CarbonLib 

message: The article should address why they are missing.  ----- 18:49, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's 8.2, 8.3, and 8.4 OSes? 

message: "Copying files over a network was faster than previous versions and Apple advertised it as being "faster than Windows NT"[citation needed].". This was demonstrated on a Keynote (which one I don't know). Phill Shiller and Steve Jobs actually had to do it twice since the Apple Computer froze during the first try. --213.135.233.166 (talk) 15:19, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mac File Transfer Faster than Windows NT 

message: This article doesn't really look like a proper article for a major operating system anymore because of it.  Want to change back to previous revision, but not sure why they were removed in the first place.StrangeApparition2011 (talk) 10:51, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The infobox was broken in an edit by an anon user. I've restored the code to restore the infobox. Thanks for pointing out the problem. AlistairMcMillan (talk) 23:16, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was the infobox and image removed? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mac OS 8. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130209071935/http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macos/359 to http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macos/359
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:33, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:07, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion