lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Inculturation

message: This article still needs more work, but for the  time being I added some relevant historical information, which indicates that inculturation was not always ageeed upon or even consistently interpreted. I deleted the unsigned commentary as irrelevant to the subject here.--Ambrosius007 (talk) 14:10, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions 

message: Is anything going to be added about non-Catholic contextual theology?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.101.239 (talk) 13:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Only Catholic?

message: Should there be a discussion of Anglican Use, Zaire Use or other current variations of the Ordinary Form in this article? --Bruce Hall (talk) 15:22, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Use and liturgical variations

message: It is a bit surprising to see references to the Latin Empire of Constantinople and to Pope Leo XIII's tolerance toward Eastern Christians.  Is this really inculturation within the scope of the article?  After all, the opening sentence of the article reads "Inculturation is a term used in Christianity, especially in the Roman Catholic Church, referring to the adaptation of the way Church teachings are presented to non-Christian cultures."  Should these references be removed?  --Tom Davis (talk) 00:04, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Inculturation <i>Between</i> Christians?

message: The article Dainichi says that the word Xavier coined was , not . 
Both articles have references.
Which is right?
--Error (talk) 16:47, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, as you have . Thanks. Caorongjin (talk) 07:49, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dai uso
Talk:John Church (minister)

message: The first paragraph needs rewriting. Reason: it is self-contradictory. If he were openly gay, how could that not be proved? Obviously when you continue reading the article it is clear that he was not openly gay, but the opener is still confusing/misleading. Also there is no citation to support the claim.
4getsu (talk) 03:24, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite/rework opening Paragraph

message: May be seen here: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/58019 and http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/58020 and http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/58018 and in his own words here http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/author/49727 67.245.219.168 (talk) 22:47, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Guten berg information
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Listerin

message: I'm a little concerned about this case, and I'm not convinced that they are all sock puppets. In particular on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kent-Meridian High School User:KarenAnn and User:Capit are dimetrically opposed. 
User:Hipocrite has been very quick to use the sockpuppet tag originally accusing Capit as being a sock of User:SirIsaacBrock 
There is evidence of some outside cordination, from Capits talk page -
:Those edits, done on the instructions of someone else, all occurred at the same time and therefore can be considered one incident. A person told me some extremely upsetting things about a school page and that the person who was trying to delete the school page systematically did this to school pages all the time. So I did what he said to do.
My guess is that these users all go to the same school with a shared IP address and there has been talk in the school about this. The age profiles seem to be different Capit shows signs of being a youngster, and KarenAnn/Matisse claims to be 65.
I find this case troubling. WP:BITE may apply, worse is the reaction of User talk:Mattisse, a user with significant contributions, who is on the point of quitting because she has been accused of being a sockmaster of the very people who attacked her. 
The other users especially User:Massmato has a very different contribution history. --Salix alba (talk) 09:01, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this a big shame. I've been editing on pages with Karen Ann - now Matisse for some time now. She has been an excellant contributor but was under considerable pressure from an individual user she felt was intimidating her after her work on an unrelated page - this went to rfc. This sense worsened when she innocently embarked on a Afd binge which turned very sour. I believe her sockpuppet accounts were naive attempts to avoid perceived harrassment and were not created to disrupt the process. I have provided some diffs on Matisse's talk page which show that she was trying to get some anonymity after these difficulties - and also show her genuine innocence of the procedures. I think that this is a potential WP:BITE issue and it's a shame if she quits, not least for me because her help has been invaluable.--Zleitzen 02:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

text: You might like to add IP  153.2.246.30 (belongs to UPS) which added a note on schools on meta:Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians. I see it now, under guise of a parcel delivery service, agents of the keep schools on wikipedia brigade are roaming the land, convincing teenagers and 65 year olds to vote against deletions. Looks like you've got a task on your hands. --Salix alba (talk) 22:12, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sigma 6

message: Surely it has now been throughly shown that 'Architectural Abdabs' was merely the headline of a piece about the band, and never actually one of the band's names?
66.25.168.110 (talk) 20:02, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Six standard deviations. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 25#Six standard deviations until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Six standard deviations" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:KLHU-CD

message: HELLO,
  I AM NOT SURE I HAVE THE RIGHT STATION HOW EVER A WHILE BACK COUPLE YEARS I WATCHED A PROGRAM CALLED "THEIR OUT THERE" THAT NIGHT  THE DISCUSSION OR TOPIC WAS ABOUT THE 9/11 ORDEAL. AND A VIDEO WAS SHOWN OF THE EVENTS THAT TOOK PLACE THAT DAY ETC, AT THE END OF THE PROGRAM AN ADD WAS PUT UP SO IF YOU WANTED TO ORDER THE VIDEO YOU COULD HAVE IT SENT TO YOU FOR FREE, I WOULD LIKE TO HAVE A COPY OF THE DOCT.IF I MAY MY EMAIL ADD IS MYCOOCOO@YAHOO.COM, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.231.143.87 (talk) 12:48, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Luca Bucci

message: I tidied up the article a bit, but this part left me a bit confused:
"Bucci, who was an indiscuss player during the first golden years of Parma, "
Can anyone who knows the subject matter shed some light on what this could mean? I don't really know what an "indiscuss player" is, but I'm also unsure about what "first golden years of Parma" means. If no-one has information on this, I'll edit it out. CarlosCoppola 09:07, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification  
Talk:Superior (band)

message: Can somebody find info on Superior band members? --Λeternus 12:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Info on Band members

message: I think this is a relly bad idea. Why does someone wants to merge an album with a band? --ΛэтєяиuS 10:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: Note that apparently there is an other band called "Superior", that appears in The Saint (film) soundtrack. -- lucasbfr talk 11:43, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Band
Talk:Cyrix 5x86

message: I remember years ago buying a box with around 30 various 486/ 5x86 chips. I think around a third were ibm and cyrix 5x86 133MHz, labelled as such and working as such.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.55.64 (talk) 22:16, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Max Speed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cyrix Cx5x86. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.cpushack.com/chippics/Cyrix5x86-100GP-HS.jpg
*Added  tag to http://www.cpushack.com/chippics/Cyrix5x86-100GP-HS.jpg
*Added  tag to http://www.cpushack.com/chippics/Cyrix5x86-120GP.jpg
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030104144558/http://worldwide-web-design.com/5x-tb.html to http://www.worldwide-web-design.com/5x-tb.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20030620071243/http://www.simtel.net/pub/pd/50153.html to http://www.simtel.net/pub/pd/50153.html
:I'm not sure which editor hard linked the above images in this article (no signature was left above, I tried to check a few edits in the history of the talk page and just gave up searching) but as of 2019 they are permanent dead links. All three images are from The CPU Shack Museum and it appears to me that they just renamed all the images and put them inside a /images folder. Instead of hard linking again to the individual JPEGs I just changed them all over to the html page (which essentially just shows the JPEG that was being linked to previously). I also added a citation for all Cyrix 5x86 images (top of processor and bottom) at the end of the section so that there would be another citation on the article (there's not three on this article so we risk it being parked for "in need of citations" etc). The Cyrix 5x86 images are all located at | http://www.cpushack.com/chippics/Cyrix/80586/ and even if they change their naming schema for photos again I'm thinking the next editor can come through and re link them off this link. I also fixed the only other citation on this article (it was a dead link also) so we should not have any dead links left on this article. Feel free to revert anything I did or engage with me in this talk (I'll follow this page) if you don't like what I did to this article. Kc7txm (talk) 06:36, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The IBM 5x86C is a variant of the Cyrix 5x86 CPU, not a CPU of IBM's own design; perhaps the article on IBM 5x86C should be merged with this one? --danikayser84 ★ 00:57, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[IBM 5x86C]] into this article?
Talk:Cherry 2000

message: I was digitizing some old VHS tapes and saw the last half of this movie on a tape.  The copyright date was 1986 in the credits, rather than 1988.
--Sean Geiger (talk) 13:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Why is this described as an "alternate future"?  Surely its no more an alternate future than every other SF story that was set years after it was written, but now we are close to that time obviously is nothing like real life.Wardog (talk) 14:18, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: When 2017 comes along, people will be saying "Where's my hot android babe?" instead of "Where's my flying car?" ;) Bizzybody (talk) 08:47, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually, "Where's my Android mobile", but...  —PaleoNeonate - 19:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Set in an alternate future" 

message: The robots from the 50s Sci-Fi classics Forbidden Planet and The Day the Earth Stood Still appear in the workshop of the android mechanic.  About 7.5 mins in. 32.212.102.239 (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember spotting them. It was a nice touch. - Bilby (talk) 05:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cameo" appearances
Talk:Louis, Grand Dauphin

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File: will be appearing as picture of the day on March 5, 2020. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2020-03-05. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:51, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:{{Remove file prefix|Hyacinthe Rigaud - Louis de France, Dauphin (1661-1711), dit le Grand Dauphin - Google Art Project.jpg}}]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:List of New England towns

message: I am beginning to tidy up this list, before adding Wikilinks.  If anyone else joins in to help, pretty much all of these place names were nicked from the UK, so make sure the link you add is to the correct town! -Ladybirdintheuk 10:01, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: 1) I just changed the language at the end of the Sagadahoc County section back to way it originally read before the changes made on May 5, 2007.  I wanted to provide some explanation of why I did this: 
The notes on this page addressing unorganized territory and defunct municipalities typically only include very brief and basic information about such entities (essentially noting their existence and possibly providing a date of disincorporation if applicable), with a link to the Wikipedia page for the entity in question, if there is one.  The text that was added on May 5 deviated from the usual format and was almost a short narrative about Perkins Township.  I don't think we need to include that level of information here.  Just as this type of information isn't included for currently active towns (but a link to the town's page is provided for those who want more information), the same should apply to former municipalities mentioned in the notes.  (Note: If you look at the archives on this talk page, whether or not unorganized or former municipalities should even be mentioned here at all has been called into question).  Anyone who wants to know more about Perkins Township can find it at the link; in fact, the text that was posted on this page parallelled the text in the introduction to the main Perkins Township article.      
In addition, the text that was posted here included some information whose veracity is, in my opinion, unclear.  The text stated that Perkins had been abandoned in the 1940s.  If you check the Census figures on the "Historical U.S. Census Totals" page for Sagadahoc County, they do not support this contention.  The first census in which Perkins reported absolutely no population at all was actually 2000; its 1940 population was 5, and its 1950 population was 9.  This doesn't prove that the stament about Perkins being abandoned in the 1940s is wrong (e.g., one can imagine a scenario in which there was some event that took place in the '40s that greatly reduced the human presence in Perkins and thus left it more-or-less "abandoned" compared to what had been the case previously), but it certainly calls it into question.  Given that I don't think we need to get into that level of detail in the first place, I'd prefer to take this factoid off of this page.
2) There hasn't been much discussion here for a while -- does JackME or anyone else have any thoughts concerning the prior discussion to split or rename this page? MCT 17:16, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sagadahoc County, ME/Checking In
Talk:History of Ottoman Egypt

message: This entry still needs an enormous amount of cleaning.
:Definately... This article is badly worded, and verb tenses are switch randomly, including use of the first person when referring to events in the 1800s...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Donnyj (talk • contribs) 18:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Is there a flag for Egypt under Ottoman rule. Thanks. It has been added, thanks. burgaz 16:37, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Flag

message: The various articles on the khedivate need a good sort out, which will probably entail mergers and spinoffs, I've started a centralised discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ottoman Empire#Ottoman Egypt needs attention, and invited discussion from WP Egypt. Le Deluge (talk) 10:21, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorting out the 19th century 

message: I've completed a stem-to-stern copy-edit of the article.  As much of the text originates from the 1911 Britannica, there are parts of the article that have an old-fashioned turn of phrase.  I generally have not disturbed that where it is still grammatically correct and not terribly impenetrable.  If there are specific sections that still need rephrasing, give a shout here and I'll have a look. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 21:22, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyedit
Talk:List of German exonyms for places in Latvia

message: It seems the German exonyms used in this list are from the early 20th century. At the same time there is a link to a map of the Baltics with "the then in use placenames". Interesting fact about this map is, that many towns have different German exonyms than the ones mentioned in the list, especially in the Vitebsk Guberna with a Latinised  version of the Russian name (like Relitza for Rositten (Rēzekne) and Liutsin for Ludsen (Ludza)). The map also has older versions of German exonyms (like Tukum - Tuckum in list, Jacobstat - Jakobstadt in list). I would like to know what the definition should be for the German exonyms in this list? --Philaweb 21:29, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Kerch Strait

message: I should warn northerly-inclined;) editors against attempts of POV-pushing regarding that. In no way the Kremlin-devised Tuzla incident was connected to any real bilateral bridge- or ferry-project between Ukraine and Russia. I'm going to delete mentions of the incident unless someone comes up with solid refs supporting such a connection.  Not to mention that there was no such projects at all, in my humble understanding) Wishes, Ukrained2012 (talk) 14:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Tuzla Island]] incident POV-pushing 

message: For the third paragraph under "History", I corrected a couple of errors, one was a date, the other was the original writer's mistakenly confusing the Edelweiss offensive of 1942 with Hitler's never realized offensive planned for 1943. The whole paragraph was taken from Speer's book, which is okay, but I tried to streamline it and make it a little smoother. (I don't like to go in and completely rewrite another person's work.)
The paragraph above it contains this sentence: "Fighting frequency intensified in the coldest months of year when the strait froze over, allowing the movement of troops over the ice." I'm not sure what it's supposed to mean but I left it alone. 
There ought to be another paragraph on the Soviet operations when crossing the Kerch, and I may do it someday, if I ever find one of those elusive round tuuits.209.179.21.14 (talk) 22:06, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  My edit for 6 August 2014
Talk:List of Berserk (1997 TV series) episodes

message: its written that Guts meets Griffith but he does not meet him, Griffith watches Guts fight from afar they only meet in the second epiode  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.247.228 (talk) 13:36, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is correct. Also the events of the 1st and 2nd episodes are not quite right and I propose to correct them and also some other episodes which have errors of grammar or content. Ozflashman (talk) 12:58, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: First Episode
Talk:Mahatma Jyotiba Phule

message: This article on Mahatma Jyotiba Phule says his full name was Jotirao Govindrao Phule. There is already an article on Jotirao Govindrao Phule, which says he was known as Mahatma Jyotirao Phule. Is this the same person, with Mahatma Jyotiba Phule being an alternative name? Tonywalton  | Talk 10:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:People from West Bengal

message: This category was renamed from People of West Bengal in line with Wikipedia guidance, after brief discussion at . --Mereda 10:36, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renamed 

message: This seems to be a category of living people with the sole exception of Chaitanya. How about moving him to History of Bengal? 'People from West Bengal' suggests current personalities.
Rimi talk contribs 06:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  category of living people?
Talk:Max van den Berg

message: Magrietus is his doopnaam, not his roepnaam. I.e. no-one calls him Margietus and every one Max. --C mon 10:45, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Künstlerroman

message: "The following are famous English-language Künstlerromane:"
I don't know hardly anything about the German language, but don't plurals take an 'en' suffix and not just an 'e'? So that it would be 'Künstlerromanen' and not 'Künstlerromane'?
No, it's Romane.85.75.96.90 10:59, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  question RE: Spelling

message: Leonard Cohen - I removed Cohen from the list. He may have written a book that falls into this category, but shouldn't other, more established writers be included here first? There must be hundreds of other established, classic books that would fall into this category (along with Joyce, Lawrence, Kingston, Fitzgerald) before Cohen's. Loperco 15:40, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists 

message: I would consider that Milan Kundera's Life is Elsewhere probably deserves a mention here, even if the WP article is far from extensive... 217.205.94.62 (talk) 08:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just German and English?
Talk:Blinky (novelty)

message: I checked out the web site and there is such a company that does sell 'blinkies'. They are actually quite neat little toys that flash a message or logo on a key chain whenever they are in light. These devices, however, are totally unlike the 'blinkies' listed here. The 'blinkies' described here have been called such for over 10 years and if Blinky Ltd ever tried to sue over 'trademark infringement' they would probably quickly find themselves counter sued by a dozen companies, and eventually have their right to brand their product 'the only, or official blinky' revoked.
It seems a dodgy ploy to capture search engine hits from people looking for these devices, but conversely their devices might actually be better as promo items than the classic blinkies.
::::Tiki God 11:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blinky Ltd 

message: *Shouldn't the plural of Blinky be Blinkies? In the article it is always written Blinkys...Zisimos 19:48, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tiki God 11:10, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plural 

message: * I can't find any references for these. All I can say is they exist, I've bought hundreds of them, and there are dozens of online companies (see next) that sell them. I'm a little raw here but I think it's a little uptight to force me to reference something so trivial as opposed to something scientific or politically controvertial.
::::Tiki God 10:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I chose blinky over all the other names because the sites that sell the most (or only blinkies) usually use that name. In the industry, Body Lights usually implies ONLY the magnetic version and also usually excludes rings, pendants and other similar things, that function almost exactly the same. Blinky itself produced over 700k results which were impossible to separate the 'blinky toy' from 'blinky everything else'.
::::Tiki God 10:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: There are 23 different LED-related pages, and I think there should be less than half that many. I've started a discussion on this at Talk:Light-emitting_diode#An_absurd_number_of_articles_involving_light-emitting_diodes; please come and join in. -- Dan Griscom (talk) 03:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganizing LED-related pages 

message: User:Wtshymanski moved the whole page to LED art. This is just silly. These are commercial devices, novelties, or toys, not art. If there was a page with other light up jewelry, clothes, toys or devices it would be logical to move this page there.
--GlowBee (talk) 10:04, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undoing Redirect
Talk:Flight information service

message: This needs editing.  The whole article is basically wrong in its description of a Flight Information Service.  For starters it is not just provided at an airport, it is a basic Air Traffic service that in theory should be provided by any suitably-licensed ATSU in any Flight Information Region.  There are other inaccuracies and quite a lot of irrelevancies.
I'll add this to my list to re-write once I get time.BaseTurnComplete 10:47, 29 July 2006 (UTC)