Talk:Palimpsest

message: This isn't backed up with any sources and looks like speculation on the part of an editor:
Cultural considerations also motivated the creation of palimpsests. The demand for new texts might outstrip the availability of parchment in some centers, yet the existence of cleaned parchment that was never overwritten suggests that there was also a spiritual motivation, to sanctify pagan text by overlaying it with the word of God, somewhat as pagan sites were overlaid with Christian churches to hallow pagan ground. Or the pagan texts may have merely appeared irrelevant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.74.14.180 (talk) 23:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Speculation in "reuse" section

message: Is this different from what is known as papyrus (pl. papyri) or just another name?
-----
I don't know of any difference. I was going to create a page called "papyrus", but I happened to find this one first. --Pinkunicorn
----
The following text was erroneously associated with palimpsest:
An early form of paper made from leaves of papyrus, used in book scrolls in ancient civilizations before the codex or book was invented (starting 5000 years ago in Egypt (and probably in other places)).  
Several layers of papyrus leaves were laid in different directions and pressed together while wet. The surface that was written on (only one was used) was treated with glue so that the ink wouldn't bleed.
----
Has anyone been talking about wikipedia itself as palimpsest?  http://conduit.rit.edu/wikitheory/index.php/Talk:What_is_an_Author%3F
This blog entry names wikis as palimpsests: http://martinlessard.blogspot.com/2005/02/wiki-as-digital-palimpsest.html (names wiki as palimpsest but does not pursue in greater detail(1) 
--66.67.215.148 19:23, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.opib.librari.beniculturali.it/english/progetti/rinascimanto_virtuale/rinascimento_storia.html
** In Palimpsest on Sun Jul 16 21:24:49 2006, Socket Error: (110, 'Connection timed out')
** In Palimpsest on Mon Jul 17 17:14:13 2006, 404 Impossibile trovare l'oggetto.
** In Palimpsest on Thu Jul 27 01:04:56 2006, 404 Impossibile trovare l'oggetto.
----maru   (talk)  contribs 05:05, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: I can only gather that  the presence of this statement 'The reed from which it was made did not grow in Italy' is left over from when this page was erroneously dedicated to describing papyrus - seems that the page has finally found what palimpsest is, but still hasn't quite disposed of some of its kindergarten language, It really should be gone - either that or add something to the effect that romans too weren't only found in Italy. 81.102.245.243 (talk) 23:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  why still harking on about papyrus? 

message: The OPIB link is dead - and might need better than holiday German to find its current location. Jackiespeel (talk) 10:35, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Dead links

message: /ˈpælɪmpsɛst/ is somewhat unclear.  Is it  /ˈpæl-ɪmp-sɛst/ (which seems natural in English) or /ˈpæl-ɪm-psɛst/ (which more closely resembles the psi in the Greek root)?
Thanks, 38.109.87.242 (talk) 15:42, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  English syllabification? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Palimpsest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041018210806/http://www.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/RV/areas.html to http://www.rrz.uni-hamburg.de/RV/areas.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.evellum.com/ductus/demo/engine/ductus/frames/bibliography/lowe_loew1972f.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: For some reason, at the end of the "Development" section, the article has this text:
Medieval codices are constructed in "gathers" which are folded (compare "folio", "leaf, page" ablative case of Latin folium), then stacked together like a newspaper and sewn together at the fold.
I don't understand why the parenthetical is there. "Folded" isn't related to "folio". It's a Germanic root, meaning it would correspond to a Latin root beginning with [p]. (Wiktionary gives "fold" as coming from PIE *pel- and "folium" as coming from PIE *bhleh3-. I could check better sources, but I don't think I need to.) Even if it were, it's a bit of a tangent. It's also not as if the idea of a "leaf" implies either folding or gathering, except when it means "page", but that requires you to already know what a codex is, or I guess people often gather leaves. DubleH (talk) 23:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are we comparing "folded" to "folio"? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Llgilpin03 (talk) 22:18, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: The Destruction of Images