Talk:Get Happy!! (Elvis Costello album)

message: Can anyone verify that this album is a "dramatic break in tone" from previous albums? I mean, I think it is, but can we prove it? Nervousbreakdance 04:20, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no proof only opinion, however, check out the Rolling Stone review for an accepted opinion. Quote and cite in /* Reception */ to support the conclusion in the lead. -- J. Wong (talk) 17:10, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Re: Dramatic

message: The Tom Carson review of the album posted on the rollingstone.com website is truncated (in error) from the original. If you want the full text, see the archive version of its original url cited in the reference.
-- J. Wong (talk) 17:15, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Rolling Stone]] Review (by Tom Carson) Truncated 

message: I should remove it, but I won't (yet). But the number of songs has nothing to do with the cutting of an LP record. The length of the recording does. And even with 20 songs, this album was only 48 minutes long, well under the point where one would get into danger (as it were) territory as far as cutting is concerned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.104.195.40 (talk) 21:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The liner notes say, "Special care had to be taken with the cutting and pressing process, but now thanks to the wonders of technology we are able to present the new, improved, "Get Happy" containing, count them, THIRTY TRACKS!!!" Not even sure if that's supposed to refer to the vinyl pressing or the CD reissue.Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:40, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's entirely possible that statement was made tongue-in-cheek. —howcheng  {chat} 15:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length, not "songs" 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Get Happy!! (Elvis Costello album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140314214515/http://dutchcharts.nl/showitem.asp?interpret=Elvis+Costello+And+The+Attractions&titel=Get+Happy%21%21&cat=a to http://dutchcharts.nl/showitem.asp?interpret=Elvis+Costello+And+The+Attractions&titel=Get+Happy!!&cat=a
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110929082158/http://charts.org.nz/showitem.asp?interpret=Elvis+Costello+And+The+Attractions&titel=Get+Happy%21%21&cat=a to http://charts.org.nz/showitem.asp?interpret=Elvis+Costello+And+The+Attractions&titel=Get+Happy!!&cat=a
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140305041450/http://norwegiancharts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Elvis+Costello+And+The+Attractions&titel=Get+Happy%21%21&cat=a to http://norwegiancharts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Elvis+Costello+And+The+Attractions&titel=Get+Happy!!&cat=a
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120111074744/http://chartheaven.9.forumer.com/a/complete-uk-yearend-album-charts_post21.html to http://chartheaven.9.forumer.com/a/complete-uk-yearend-album-charts_post21.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:41, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified