Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/DreamGuy-2

message: user:DreamGuy - pretty much constantly rude to other users, when asked about it, blanks comments from his user page, when instinstanly asked, dcalls it harrassment, and tries to play victim, please look at his edit history to find out the very specifics. User:Dbraceyrules/Horatii and others will likly say the same as i have.
19:59, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. If you had bothered to look at the change you mention above, you would see that it was clearly making it more NPOV and not POV. I had a typo in the edit description area, as those are more dificult to catch as they do not show up on preview any different than when first entered. MAking it "clear that these are beliefs and not necessarily true" is CLEARLY making something NPOV, and looking at the edit you would see that that's exactly what I did. For you to try to use that to claim that I am knowingly putting POV into articles when it is clear I am doing just the opposite is simply absurd. DreamGuy 03:58, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)You have got to be effin kidding me. The delete votes clearly strongly outpaced the keep votes. It's ridiculous things like keeping articles most people clearly thought deserved to be deleted that makes this place such a joke. A bunch of juveniles kiddies can come along and screw up VfDs by making nonsensical claims to keep a useless and craptastic article like this and then some admin who can;t count keeps the article. The lunatics are running the asylum here. DreamGuy 05:00, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)Sorry to be bothered by someone as ignorant as you, but what you are claiming above makes no sense. In fact I can't even fathom how you think what you say above is an argument against my edits. I did not edit the Amaterasu article at all, I didn;t do anything to redirect it. And there is no "gneeral consensus" on that page, just you (who got the title wrong in the first place) and some whacko nutjob going around unddoing my edits because I dared to not let him make claims about Planet X and reptile aliens as if they were true. And of course Wikipedia is not a dictionary, but that still doesn't mean your usage was right, and it has nothing to do with these Japanese phrases. Go edit Japanese articles if you want to try to use Japanese definitions in place of the English ones.
Such words are obviously personal attacks and POV.Horatii 02:58, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

text: the evidance was supplied by horatii, please read it., also, i did say, examine his edit history. Gabrielsimon 04:45, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I still see no evidence.  Without diffs, there's no way of telling slander from evidence. --Carnildo 05:38, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: how can someones exact words beused as differences?  this is exactly what he said, just go to his edit history  to see the proof. Gabrielsimon 05:42, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Carnildo please take a fresh new look at the RfC.  You might want to retract your statement now that more evidence has been properly presented. --AI 00:51, 12 July 2005 (UTC)

text: Here are some specifics, mostly put in the context of his User Page. While they are not necessarily his rudest comments (I'd have to go check everything he's ever done, as it's just about all rude), it does prove that he is extremely arrogant and stubborn. I quote: "About me? Eclectic scholar, published author, and all around nice guy, but I won't list details as Wiki guidelines discourage self-promotion." He is an "eclectic scholar" of mythology, who doesn't know what a mythology is ( and )? I find it hard to believe that someone who can't spell "principal" () or "Sun" () could be a "published author". (He then sarcastically makes fun of other people's spelling, even though they, unlike him, do not then go and stubbornly revert the corrections.) I have seen literally dozens of examples of DreamGuy hardly being an "all around nice guy" - many are quoted above, and here is another one. He claims "a lot of posters got their information from extremely bad sources. These "extremely bad sources" could well be the works of Joseph Campbell and Carl Jung, as he seems to think he knows more about mythology than those two, given that he so often disagrees with them (, for example). He's guilty of hypocrisy, which I pointed out here. Is that enough? elvenscout742 13:39, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

text: This just in. DreamGuy unilaterally makes decisions regarding the moving of articles so that they have inappropriate names, enforcing his (incorrect) POV even when consensus has been building against him for almost a month and takes credit for other peoples' writing in articles. This can be seen in his movement of "Missing Sun myth" to "Missing sun motif" (), and in his taking credit for the use fo the word motif ("...my change calling this a motif..." [my emphasis]). If one checks the history of Missing Sun myth, there is a vast treasure trove of snide remarks, incorrect changes and lack of knowledge of the subject. Sorry to keep making this page longer, but more examples need to be given until something is at last done to make sure DreamGuy can't mess Wikipedia up anymore, and I'm willing to keep pointing out the countless violations of Wikiquette (among other things, including factual errors) on his part, even if noone else is. (EDIT: Oh, yeah, and I plan on doing this on a daily basis until DreamGuy is appropriately - I've got plenty of resources to draw from, and he'll probably do something new every other day.)elvenscout742 11:50, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evidence 

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greek_mythology&diff=prev&oldid=13491593
rude
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Medieval_revenants&diff=prev&oldid=13818707
also rude
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Missing_sun_motif&diff=prev&oldid=17805544
also rude
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Elvenscout742&diff=prev&oldid=17930133
also reude and decptivly profance
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DreamGuy&diff=prev&oldid=17930203
oblivous to his own rudeness
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DreamGuy&diff=prev&oldid=18356337
violation of policey
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves&diff=prev&oldid=18390341
doesnt want to deal with our attempts to resolve out isasues with him
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DreamGuy&diff=prev&oldid=18611207
Gabrielsimon 23:37, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: more links that show his lack of civility

message: According to Solipsist we have to remove the Recommendations section. I moved it to the discussion page.
----
I would reccomend that DreamGuy be banned.
Gabrielsimon 04:10, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that! elvenscout742 13:02, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

text: BLOCK HIM PERMANENTLY, HE DOES NOT ABIDE BY WIKIPEDIA GUIDELINES AND SHOULD BE BANNED PERMANENTLY.Horatii 21:53, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree entirely. He's too dangerous to be allowed back in after a certain time. But, uh, Horatii? Don't you think you should tone it down a bit? Perhaps lower case letters here and there? One of my main conflicts with the accused is over "incorrect" capitalisation, and he'd have a field day with your post ;)... But seriously, we have to be calm and patient. elvenscout742 12:29, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

text: I suggest restriction of previleges.  If futher personal attacks, cancel his account.--AI 21:56, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Recommendations by involved parties is not a part of the procedure of RfC. --AI 01:08, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Recommendations

message: his "evidance" agsint me is becasue he looks at incomplete pictures, and thjen yells and cries about it.   i have been civil and  ive tried to be carefull in my wording.
above he cites this as something to scream about http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gabrielsimon&diff=prev&oldid=12643427
when he didnt even take time to look at  the response, apparently. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gabrielsimon&diff=next&oldid=12643427
this seems typical of his behaviour. ( as i also mentioned above, revenge is  more an "taking the high road" sort of concept rather than an action)
Gabrielsimon 19:40, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: a response to the outside views by Solipsist and UninvitedCompany

message: This RfC has been deleted since efforts to resolve the dispute by both users certifying the page (both have been banned from the project as abusive accounts) were insufficient. El_C 21:16, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because this is a retroactive (and as such, unusual) act, I have refractored —and removed— the project page's contents on the talk page. It can be read here, but should not otherwise be restored without clearing it with me first. Thanks. El_C 21:20, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Project page deleted