lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Supreme Court of Ohio

message: I am pretty sure we could create a public domain version of the seal instead of :File:SEAL - SUPREME COURT OHIO.GIF.  We'd need to find a good PD copy of Ohio seal (note that :File:Seal of Ohio (Official).svg isnt a good basis, as it does not include pre 1977 publishing information), and then change the text as described. John Vandenberg (chat) 04:09, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  seal 

message: Hello everyone, I would like to add this and this if no one has any objections. I will not replace the seal, just put them in the article. We can still keep the image already there if it is requested.
Thanks, Sixflashphoto (talk) 08:06, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Images

message: A list of past justices would be informative 12.173.254.36 (talk) 21:28, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That exists at List of justices of the Ohio Supreme Court. Snickers2686 (talk) 03:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past justices 

message: Didn't want to edit but noticed the article is not up to date re:who is the disciplinary counsel.
https://courtnewsohio.gov/happening/2019/CaligiuriAppt_092319.asp 162.84.128.192 (talk) 06:03, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Disciplinary Counsel
Talk:Infinitism

message: PJTraill 18:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: PJTraill 08:48, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the article obviously needs splitting.1Z 21:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article should be split into religion and philosophy 

message: It seems to me that it must have been written by Peter Klein, one of the very few supporters of the view.  Other (much more common) positions are criticized, infinitism is supported, and Klein is cited.  It's more of a short endorsement paper than an encyclopedia article.209.6.113.62 (talk) 23:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is not impartial. 

message: The artistic concept of life put forward adds no information relevant to infinitism, it just appears to propose a list of qualities exhibited by life.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.3.179.175 (talk) 20:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deviation from topic in "Infinitism in art" 

message: anyone have any Idea or interest in working out a definition of infinitheistic denominationalism or infinitheism for short??? Well I do... I believe infinitheism is a simple system or way to validate that any religion (organized or not) is in a broad sense no way superior to or inferior to any other religion. though the individual may not subscribe or believe in any religion period. It could be a simple way to acknowledge that someone respects all faiths regardless of personal beliefs. Its a respect for religion without judging one above the other and without using words that signify any certain denomination at all 2601:49:C201:A2A0:5C6C:BA5E:3130:E343 (talk) 22:33, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infinitheism
Talk:Guerilla Records

message: lil eazy-e is sign to this record label he doesnt seem to be listed here...
: I think you must be confused. Guerilla Records is a British record label most active in the early 1990s which specialised in "dub house", a stripped back, bass-heavy version of progressive house. It has nothing to do with American gangsta rap. Quaestor23 (talk) 09:43, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Haddonfield (Halloween)

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was PAGE MOVED per request and per WP:NC:CITY#Fictional cities. -GTBacchus(talk) 07:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Blackout (wartime)

message: Should we list references to blackouts in popular cartoons of the day, such as "Wacky Blackout" and the ending of "A Tale of Two Kitties"?   --The_Iconoclast (talk) 08:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  PUT OUT THAT LIGHT!  
Talk:Bomb damage assessment

message: Hi. Will be applying a tag to the article to hopefully draw attention of a subject matter expert from one of the wikiprojects who can make it current, since it last seems to reference developments in 2002. 

The 1991 Gulf War is widely regarded as having the most effective and consistent BDA of any conflict to date. After the end of hostilities, the Battle Damage Assessment Working Group (BDAWG) was formed at the behest of MTIC, the Military Targeting Intelligence Committee. Largely, this group sought to create a standard lexicon of terminology for describing BDA, and to develop an outlook for the future of BDA. Possible future techniques involve using lasers or particle beams in a manner similar to side scan sonar to map, in three dimensions, the condition of a target. Boeing has developed (as of 2002) a system whereby a BDA "sensor" is towed a third of a kilometer behind the munition. This system is supposed to be capable of near real-time BDA by directly observing the munition's interaction with the target.
This is my first time tagging an article for a section update like this but please know I'm proceeding in good faith. I'm just not an expert on this and would prefer that one tackle it. 
Cheers. Jdanek007 (talk) 20:10, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that I also tagged the article for linking to broken or outdated sources. All of the links are dead... Jdanek007 (talk) 20:47, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: The future of BDA
Talk:Dark Arena

message: I am keeping this article at Stub-Class for the time being. Every section needs significant improvement before even C-Class can even be considered. The two biggest problems with the article right now is that there does not exist any verifiable sources verifying any of the information on the game. In addition, the "Weaponry" section should not be in the article as it is WP:GAMEGUIDE information, which is not appropriate per Wikipedia standards.
Here are some verifiable sources that can help you get started in the right direction again with the article (feel free to copy-and-paste the templates onto the article when you reference them, as I have already set up these citations):
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
For the magazine sources, you would have to do some searching to find the actual articles. Hopefully, this will help in giving the article a good start. Remember: sources, sources, sources; that cannot be stressed enough! Everything needs to be reliably sourced. Also, go over Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines for our Manual of Style for video game articles. This will also help you on organizing all the information in the article. Hope this helps, MuZemike (talk) 20:41, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WPVG Assessment
Talk:Gretsch White Falcon

message: Learn to spell! it is engraved not ingraved!
(65.96.215.116 (talk) 23:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  JSC ltd 18:47, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I replaced the tag for a bit longer. The article still needs a little "poetic adjective" cleanup which leans the article into original research territory. Unless some reputable refs for the poetry can be found(anyone have a Tony Bacon book handy?) How many times does the word "striking" need to be used. And "sparkly" could be "encyclopedia" up a little. The lead-in is the weakest area. Just a tweak here n there and it's done. Anger22  (Talk 2 22) 15:39, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I did some small cleanup and smoothed out a few rough edges. Also, JSC, I apologize for any offense I may have caused you by my last comment; it was unnecessary and uncalled for.  NSR77 18:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I overreacted.  I won't do that anymore.  JSC ltd 20:34, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Any help you wish to spare is greatly appreciated. Thank you! NSR77 17:49, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: White Falcon

message: For a guitarist to be included on this list, they should be readily identifiable with the instrument.  Stephen Stills is a good example.  Brian Setzer is right on the edge of being a "notable White Falcon player," because he is much more a "notable 6120 player."  James Hetfield?  Rich Robinson?  I can't find a single picture online of them playing a White Falcon, and they are not closely identified with it; I would say Hetfield is better known as a Flying V and ESP Explorer man, and Robinson now plays mostly a Les Paul Jr. (although I'll always think of him with that battered Tele).  Do these guys really belong in this section?  71.215.157.219 22:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since I see no suggestions/confirmations/denials, I'm removing James Hetfield, Rich Robinson and Dave Grohl from the list of notable White Falconeers.  In order to list a guitarist as a "notable Brand-X player,"  they should be 1) notable [not that Hetfield, Robinson and Grohl aren't notable...], and 2) readily identifieable with the Brand-X guitar.  There should at least be pictures.  JSC ltd 18:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable White Falcon Players

message: There's a stub article on the Gretsch 6136.  The White Falcon's model number (until the late '70s) was 6136.  They're the same thing, basically.  We don't really need two articles on the same thing.  Let's put the model number in this article, and delete the other one.  JSC ltd 03:35, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Update:  This article 'already' had the model number (I even put it there myself, silly me).  Gretsch 6136 is AfD.  JSC ltd 04:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Gretsch 6136
Talk:The Atlas (novel)

message: I included an external link to an interview I did with Vollmann because I didn't know anywhere else to site the source. I know you're not supposed to self-promote or write anything related to your own projects, so wanted to make sure it doesn't violate ethics. -Requisite  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Requisite (talk • contribs) 15:50, August 26, 2007 (UTC) 
I'm not really sure how this editing process works here, but this book is definitely more of a short story collection than a novel.  So maybe it shouldn't say that it's a novel in the entry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.235.174 (talk) 07:50, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Chandni Chowk metro station (Delhi)

message: This is a stub for one of the main station on Line 2 (Vishwa Vidyalaya - Central Secretariat) Other information regarding the station will be added as and when the information is acquired. Ekant
:Even if that is the case, it still fails pretty much all our content policies.  It's loaded and reads like an excerpt from a travel guide.  Cut it down the just the facts, and provide at least enough factual information to give some context.  Have a look at some of the stubs in :Category:Railway stations in Great Britain for an idea of what I mean.  PS WP:SIGN your posts on talk pages. Chris talk back 18:51, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:33, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 
Talk:La Plata Partido

message: Hey, I though Dardo Rocha founded the city of La Plata, but is the information about the founding of the Partido correct? -- dockingmantalk 18:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no clue... But the foundation dates in the City/Partido articles are different (Which means very little) Mariano(t/c) 10:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dardo Rocha
Talk:Electric Eye (song)

message: Is there a source for the song interpretation? If so it should be cited; who cares what some random editor thinks. Penguinwithin 05:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source?

message: It's impossible for the information about Iron Maiden covering this song during the Di'Anno era to be true because Di'Anno left the band before this song was recorded. --Sparkiplasma (talk) 21:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Maiden cover?

message: I heard the song (again) recently, and it seems that today's Britain is not far from that scenario they sing about, eh?
--Thewizzy (talk) 10:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: reality?
Talk:In the Heat of the Night (novel)

message: About this section, did the author himself make these comments about his first novel? Or, is this someone's speculation? Is all this really necessary for the article? I'm sure someone put a great amount of effort into analysing the novel but, it would help if we had the author's own words. 142.167.172.81 (talk) 22:58, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Symbols
Talk:Ranks and insignia of the Hitler Youth

message: The two tables are overlapping in my browser (Opera). So that a quarter of the first table is obscured. Could someone edit the tables so that dont overlap .Xerex 18:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables are overlapping 

message: I removed the comparison chart as it was making claims that the children HJ ranks were equal to regular adult ranks, even suggesting some of the more senior children HJ ranks were the equivalents of Majors and Colonels in the Wehrmacht.  This is obviously not the case as even the most senior HJ child member was junior to the lowest adult.  Different story for the adult ranks, Bannfuhrer, etc, but for children...no. -O.R.Comms 14:15, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children rank seniority
Talk:The Rifles (novel)

message: I agree that The Rifles has the largest component of modern-day content of any of the Seven Dreams novels so far, but it is by no means the only one that is "not wholly" an historical novel. For example -- and this is by no means the only example -- there is a good bit about present-day Greenlanders and, if memory serves, about Vollmann's own travels in Northeastern Canada in The Ice Shirt. - Jmabel | Talk 06:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1990s plot ''vs.'' historical novel
Talk:Taylor Mead

message: IMDB gives Chicago; Richard Avedon's The Sixties gives Detroit; factorymade.org gives Grosse Pointe. I'm following the latter, which seems to be the more precise. RodC 19:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Place of birth

message: The short film Taylor Mead's Cat featured on SNL was shot by Gary Weis, not Errol Morris as previously stated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.116.236.39 (talk) 01:11, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taylor Mead's Cat 

message: He was probably born before 1990, just at a wild guess.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.217.108.124 (talk) 23:43, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 
Talk:Counter-sniper tactics

message: There are A LOT more companies than just red-owl that do counter-sniper stuff.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.139.112.137 (talk) 19:34, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

message: It goes in depth in a lot of parts, but if the original creator had access to that information, they could have filled it out a lot more.  Could use a bit of expanding if the average joe could add things to this I'd say.
This article is rubbish. It is some kid who plays computer games. Military articles need close vetting by members of the military.
 
This entire article needs to be completely revised or removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.253.4.128 (talk) 02:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page has a lot of pertinent information omitted 

message: The article's tone and style look (especially in some places) like copied from a (warfare?) handbook. Note for example the following sentence:
:Call the bird: First you pick the fastest and most athletic squad member [...]
The article's originality should be verified, especially against the book cited in the references section. Whatever the resolution, a relevant note should probably be issued on the discussion page, and the style of the article should be changed to more encyclopedic-like, neutral point of view. –Akavel (talk) 21:11, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suspicions of copyright infringement 

message: Who the hell played so much CoD 6 that they've posted that "tracking electronically" section just before "see also"? I guess this section doesn't need citation, it needs deletition.--46.138.170.210 (talk) 15:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heartbeat Sensors!? 

message: I have removed the  tag which proposed that this article be deleted.  The complaint is a need for more references but deletion would be an absurd remedy.  I have added links to source searches above.  These show that there is an extensive literature about this.  Editors wanting more references should please look there. Warden (talk) 15:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: This section of the article doesn't have a single citation. Needs a serious re-write with citations or just remove it. Hopefully someone can add pertinent information that is directly from a reputable source. E.g. a military handbook, or small unit tactics handbook.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.211.38.34 (talk) 23:27, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Counter Attacking the Sniper
Talk:List of Chicago Bears seasons

message: A width of 30% for that column stretches some rows to much vertically. KyuuA4 (talk) 06:45, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards column too wide 
Talk:Milhosť

message: I changed that "of Slavic origin" back because in my opinion the villagenames were mostly in Hungarian and the Slovak names came later. Hope you don´t mind. --Norababa 19:05, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This was OR and an invalid assumtion (see e.g works of Branislav Varsik or Ferdinand Ulicny, Slovak names did not came “later”). The name Miglec (Milgost) is clearly of Slavic origin and there are several similar place names in Slovakia, but also in the Czech Republic. The name is surely very old, because it was adopted by non-Slavs with /g/ and not with /h/ (this change occured in Slovak already in the 12th century). Ditinili (talk) 10:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Of Slavic origin
Talk:Balaenoptera

message: A mitochondrial DNA analysis by Hassanin et. al. (2012) recovers Balaenoptera as paraphyletic relative to the Gray Whale and the Humpback Whale. Rather than sink the latter two species into Balaenoptera, the authors resurrect the genus Pterobalaena Eschricht, 1849 for the minke whales and Rorqualus F. Cuvier, 1836 for the blue, Omura's, sei, Bryde's, and Eden's whales. It remains to be seen if this novel generic scheme is accepted but it would mean that minke whales may be more primitive than traditionally thought. 
Hassanin A., Delsuc F., Ropiquet A., Hammer C., Janssen van Vuuren B., Matthee C., Ruiz-Garcia M., Catzeflis F., Areskoug V., Nguyen T.T. & Couloux A. (2012). Pattern and timing of diversification of Cetartiodactyla (Mammalia, Laurasiatheria), as revealed by a comprehensive analysis of mitochondrial genomes. Comptes Rendus Biologies 335: 32-50. 68.4.28.33 (talk) 02:35, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paraphyly
Talk:Celebrations (confectionery)

message: The UK tin no longer seems to include the topic bar, however the milky way is included. --Adam 19:12, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: UK tin

message: Why is Dove listed? That's Galaxy's name in the USA, but it's impossible for an American version of Celebrations to include Mars and Milky Way (the closest counterparts would be Milky Way and 3 Musketeers respectively). We need clarification here. Digifiend (talk) 13:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dove
Talk:Wyvern (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: Having recently started a List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters, I am trying to determine which monster articles should be redirected into the lists.  I believe this article may be a suitable candidate to be merged and redirected into List of Dungeons & Dragons monsters (1974-1976), as that is when it first debuted in the Dungeons & Dragons game.  Please discuss reasons for or against such a merge.  If no discussion has taken place 5 days from now, I will redirect this article to that list; otherwise I will follow whatever discussion takes place here.  Thank you!  :) BOZ (talk) 02:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: As there were no responses, I redirected this article to the list page.  Since no response is also no consensus, any editor may restore this article at any time. However, rather than simply reverting, I urge you to use this space to develop some form of consensus regarding the article, lest another editor put this article up for deletion. BOZ (talk) 02:29, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirected

message: I am restoring this article to add a publication history section.  If, afterwards, it is believed that this article should be redirected once again, you may do so. BOZ (talk) 17:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Restored
Talk:13 States

message: The USA became independent on July 2, 1776, with the Declaration approved on July 4. The Declaration clearly says "United States of America" -- this was the new country's birthday. Rjensen 19:14, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: the USA became independent on July 2 and took its new name July 4, which is always celebrated as the official national birthday. I might add that newborn often are named a few days after birth! Rjensen 22:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No POV--it's straight from Morris, Encyclopedia of American History (1976). Morris is a leading expert on the era. The suggestion that the 13 colonies lived on past 1776 is Loyalist POV I suppose---the notion that the USA was created in 1781 is not in any textbook.  Rjensen 01:42, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *I think this article is unnecessary, and probably a POV fork.  There isn't really anything here that wouldn't better be located at Thirteen Colonies.  There is plenty of room there to mention how the colonies revolted from GB and became "States".  --JW1805 (Talk) 21:18, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We have numerous articles that reference the 13 colonies when they actually mean the 13 original states. And there are many correct references to the 13 original states that can link here for a listing. So let's keep it. Note that back in 1976 we had the "Bicentennial Council of the Thirteen Original States" . As for POV--well it's a POV held by millions and needs to be represented. Is there some OTHER POV here? then it can be represented too. Wiki says that all serious POVs have to be included. Rjensen 22:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

text: I agree that there is little point to having two separate articles. It does smack of a POV fork. older ≠ wiser 04:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this article necessary

message: The history of the 13 colonies ended in 1776. But the 13 original states lived on and passed the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation and Constitution. Surely that is activity enough for an article.  Rjensen 01:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bollocks. The colonies "declared" independence in 1776. The independence was not formally recognized until 1783. There is clearly an overlapping period during the revolution when the status was indeterminate and depended on which side you were on at the time. Perhaps Thirteen colonies is not the best name for the article, but it is stupidity to insist on having separate articles on such something so closely related. older ≠ wiser 04:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Totally agree.  This article is pointless and should be redirected to Thirteen Colonies, which is the proper term, because it is the most widely used term to describe these entities.  "The Thirteen States" doesn't have any special meaning, and could refer to any 13 states, but "The Thirteen Colonies" means only one thing, the founding members of the USA.    --JW1805 (Talk) 17:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  13 colonies all dead in 1776