lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Clear Creek Baptist Bible College

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Major edits by people working for the College Alexf(talk) 21:02, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it probably goes back years. The current version of the article has a sentence from 2023: "H. Leo Eddleman (1911-1995), who has served many of our Baptist Schools". Tacyarg (talk) 21:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (March 2023)
Talk:Siobhain McDonagh

message: I have removed the sentence about the fact that McDonagh was selected through a process that was later contested in the courts, as it is misleading. It implies that the process remains illegitimate and thus makes the MP's place in Westminster seem more controversial than it is. It does not continue to state that political parties are allowed to use AWS until 2015, and thus I consider it to be a violation of NPOV. What'smore, it does not provide any biographical information of relevance about the subject. AJMW (talk) 00:57, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry but it does not suggest the process remains illegitimate in any way whatsoever, it just shows the facts - i.e. that illegal sex discrimination occurred in 1996. The fact is that the shortlists were illegal right up until 2001 - in other words the whole of the term served by politicians elected in 1997, thus it is hugely notable.  The change of the law in 2001 is i totally irrelevant to this discussion anyway as it was not retrospective at all - i.e. it did not seek to excuse and thus did not legalise any of the illegal selections that took place in 1996. To summarise - the law was clearly broken, thus the MPs place in Westminster IS controversial (or at least the first term they served was)- that's why it is notable.--Shakehandsman (talk) 01:56, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: All Women Shortlists
Talk:Siobhan Davies

message: As is, it's borderline but if a citation can be found for the 1st choreographic fullbright, that probably establishes notability. StarM 01:28, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:N 
Talk:Fly to the Rainbow

message: I wouldn't say the genre of this album is Heavy Metal, instead i'd say ballad rock
--Dry. (talk) 10:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: are we counting Setlist.fm as a valid source? 179.93.182.38 (talk) 21:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Setlist.fm 

message: are we counting Setlist.fm as a valid source? 2804:431:E7C4:FFEF:733A:F804:E3D2:3B7B (talk) 21:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Setlist.fm
Talk:Siobhan Fallon Hogan

message: How does her family name become her middle name, just because she's married? NorthernThunder (talk) 01:03, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, also wondering why Imdb and Allmovie both list her name as "Siobhan Fallon", not "Siobhan Hogan Fallon". Ufwuct (talk) 13:50, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

text: Siobhan Fallon Hogan is her current professional name.  This is how she is listed in credits (such as the 2015 Fox miniseries, "Wayward Pines."  11:36, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Siobhan Redmond

message: Hi  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C7:7C0B:B01:F8AF:E448:B450:6C4C (talk) 19:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

message: Siobhan Redmond had 3 other sisters,Kathy,Fiona and Carol Redmond, they are all very close.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.26.174.61 (talk) 10:42, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Flyleaf (album)

message: :The album has sold 435,852 copies in the US
Nice to see wikipedia lives on the cutting edge of album sale statistics.  ^_^  --Starwed 07:36, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales 

message: Why does someone keep removing the second length to Fully Alive? Both versions are real, I have them both. Why does reference to the radio mix being on most copies of the album keep getting removed? I think it should be here. Bramblestar (ShadowClan Leader) (talk) 21:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fully Alive - 2 versions
Talk:Folk of the 80's

message: Being only 4 songs, and a vinyl release, it's unclear whether this was released on a 12" or a 7" record.  I remember several 4-song EPs in the 80s which were released on 7" records (usually to be played at 33 rpm) with 2 songs on each side.  It would be nice if someone could find out what format this EP was released on and include it in the article. - Ugliness Man 07:07, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format? 
Talk:Folk of the 80s (Part III)

message: On the image of the album cover, it is 80's.  Why change it to 80s?  Grammatically it should be '80s, so that can't be the reason.  Why change it?
If there is a reason, shouldn't that be noted within the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:8070:9740:70D1:B3B4:3A12:208D (talk) 04:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why The Title Change?
Talk:Fome

message: If so, a link should be directed to her article.AcemiBalık (talk) 16:48, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is that Majida Issa on the cover?
Talk:For Alto

message: There's so much debate about whether the album was recorded in 1968 or 1969 that I'm surprised to see an exact month...? I left 1969, but in the absence of a ref axed "February" (& updated release date to 1971). // Knifegames (talk) 13:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording / Release dates
Talk:Siri Hustvedt

message: This article reads like an advertisement or a resume instead of an encyclopedia article. It needs to be rewritten and edited from an neutral point of view. Mattbucher (talk) 16:42, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Haven't you heard? Wikipedia is not really an encyclopedia, but a PR platform. While the articles about writers read like the usual blurb, the ones about musicians are even worse, because they contain the most trivial tweets. -- 79.223.23.236 (talk) 09:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Discussion had but gone anywhere in 8 years, and article has been updated around 100x since then. I'm removing the notice. You can always reopen the discussion, preferably with a more detailed discussion. Dovid (talk) 12:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:For Now (EP)

message: An on-going sock puppet case involves the continual addition of unsourced sales figures. (Often, the number is changed while the source for an old figure is left in place.) Any unsourced sales numbers and/or certifications will be reverted on sight. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 20:57, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That wasn't the reason to redirect, it was redirected following the community discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/For Now. I will restore the redirect, since the discussion was fairly recent and the consensus still applies. If you feel that this is a notable EP, I would ask you to read WP:MUSIC and change the article in a way so that it passes it, typically by adding in-depth coverage of the EP in reliable third-party sources. Cheers, Amalthea 18:07, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced sales figures
Talk:Elizabethtown Community and Technical College

message: I think the characterization that ECTC offers two-year degrees is misleading, particularly to readers outside of the U.S. who may not be familiar with the term. As an informal term, referring to an associate degree as a two-year degree may be OK but this is an encyclopedia and an accurate description is needed. The colleges offer Associate of Arts and Associate of Science degrees in many areas. This can be verified by visiting KCTCS's Web site as well as ECTC's.ReneGMata (talk) 18:56, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Time founded was not 2004 as I attended it in 1990. 2603:6011:9F00:249:615E:47B1:1DD1:8497 (talk) 19:43, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time founded
Talk:Nirmala Joshi

message: She is known as Mother Nirmala now.  To refer to her as Sister Nirmala is like calling a bishop "Father"...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ASimpleSinner (talk • contribs) 13:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  As the Superior General 

message: kya aap ke yanha koi nun wapas apne ghar jana chahe to kya aap log uske shath galt harkat karte ho jai ki uske dimag ko sun kar dena or use ghar baat nahi karana ghar jane ke time use kanhi or bhej dena ye sub aap ke nun log ek kam umra ki nun ke shanth kar rahe hai kya ye sahi hai batana jara . is ka jawab aap de phir aage sub kuch prof ke shanth batoung.  my email ID is sisterashita32@ymail.com plz sent ans. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sisterashita (talk • contribs) 21:51, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  help her 
Talk:Cimarron people (Panama)

message: A large part of this article is unfounded point of view.
Drake's occasional alliance with a cimarron group was the exception rather than the rule. For the most part the English pirates and other raiders that sought to utilize the cimarrones in the endeavours against Spanish dominions quickly managed to alienate them.
The English were by far the most actively involved in the infamous "triangular trade" between Europe, Africa and America, of which slavery was the main pillar. So it is difficult to understand how the English could be remotely percieved as "liberators" by the Africans slaves. Paradoxically, even in times of war between England and Spain, the highly coveted "asiento", or monopoly in the supply of slaves to Spain and its colonies was for the most part granted to the English.
===16th century vs. 18th century===
It would be really good to identify what relations were in each century.  The "triangular trade" was an 18th-19th century activity.  The Hawkins/Drake English 16th century endeavors seem tied to three specific voyages.MikeVdP (talk) 01:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Post

message: It would be really good to identify what relations were in each century.  The "triangular trade" was an 18th-19th century activity.  The Hawkins/Drake English 16th century endeavors seem tied to three specific voyages.MikeVdP (talk) 01:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: 16th century vs. 18th century

message: The English were granted the Asiento in 1713, after coming out of the War of the Spanish Succession on the winning side.  They held it for 30 years.  That's just to add one fixed point to a statement that, as to chronology, is a bit "fuzzy," a word I learned from Al Gore.
"Cimarrones" (= 'renegades') in Spanish does not truly mean specifically a runaway slave, although used without qualification it often refers to slaves.  As an adjective, it can be applied to feral animals, especially ones with attitude, like wild pigs, or even to a river which is swift-flowing and has lots of rapids.
Terry J. Carter (talk) 16:53, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Specifics 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Cimarron (people). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 5#Cimarron (people) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cimarron (people)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Siv Jensen

message: She is in fact  part Chairman, (that´s right: not "Leader", not "chairwoman"). The party itself decided it, and she has accepted it.  See eg. http://www.frp.no/Innhold/FrP/Temasider/Flere_sprak/English/?folderpagesize=20, where she signs: Siv Jensen,
Party Chairman. Regards, Huldra (talk) 23:02, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Chairman
Talk:Sjeng Schalken

message: changed his birthyear from 1982 into the correct 1976
The photo currently being used here is so poor that it is surely barely worth using? Macphysto (talk) 11:47, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the article, Schalken was serving for the match at 5-5 in the fifth set of his Quarter final against Hewitt at Wimbledon 2002. That is not possible. You can't serve for a set/match/championship at level scores. A difference of two games is needed to win a set/match. Tvx1 12:31, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  2002 Wimbledon Quarter Final 
Talk:Sjur Refsdal

message: Living persons?  Sjur is dead.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.29.77.101 (talk) 13:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Beu Sisters

message: Does anyone know what year the Beu Sisters formed as a group?  I wrote in the article that they had formed in a cappella group by the end of the 1990s, but since I didn't have an exact date, I put 2002 as their first active year in the infobox since that was the year they released their record.  If anyone can provide a better date, please feel free to do so.  Fabricationary 04:16, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Years active?
Talk:Skip Hinnant

message: The article implies that he retired in the early 90s and focused on VA work since then. Could we get more details on his work since 1990? Or did he truly retire that year? eksortso (talk) 17:30, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  His voice acting career since 1990 

message: Per WP:SOURCE, I removed the citation given for date of death. It's from Google Groups, is clearly marked as a rumour, and they don't even get his age right (they say 91, he was 81). If a source is even required, a more reputable one is needed. 136.159.160.121 (talk) 16:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. A properly-sourced date of death is needed. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 08:05, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Source removed; better source needed
Talk:Skip Homeier

message: ...but I have it on good authority that Skip Homeier has sadly passed away. My future father-in-law is friends with his son whom I have met on at two occasions, and he (my future father-in-law) said that Skip died about a week ago. I know this isn't a grounds for changing anything on here but still I thought I would at least give y'all heads up in the event that his passing is publicized. Thank you.--Shaneymike (talk) 18:03, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  I know this hasn't been publicized yet... 

message: Here's proof of that fact:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0742249/
AND I just noticed that he was on ANOTHER episode of the same show called "The Amphibians" that aired in 1965:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0742293/
He may have been on other episodes, but did not find any others just yet.
Neither of these are listed for him on his Wiki page.
Bizzacks (talk) 13:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It's very possible. But, the actor Keith Andes has been confused with Skip Homeier here on wikipedia and possibly elsewhere. I had to edit out a couple of appearances that were clearly Homeier but credited to Andes in his article. We should be careful of imdb; I have found errors there. It is user-generated, like wikipedia but with far less rigorous standards. It is not a reliable source. Wastrel Way (talk) Eric Wastrel Way (talk) 21:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skip Homeier was also on an episode of Voyage to the Bottom of The Sea called "Attack!" that aired in 1968
Talk:Skip Prokop

message: Even a pre-disco hit like Pretty Lady was a radio/dance hit in USA. Need to mention Ron Skip Prokop as writer and arranger w Canadian group, Lighthouse. The song did chart in 1973, but no data given here. Not full coverage. Need data.Thanks, JS 2601:145:8003:2930:C8A1:EB96:5613:CE10 (talk) 22:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pretty Lady, dance music & radio hit
Talk:Skip Schumaker

message: Someone has been adding the comment "skip schumaker is the best coach ever!" to the bottom of the page. 75.16.247.208 03:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 
Talk:Free to Be... You and Me

message: This article seems awfully negative in its view of the record. Not encyclopedic, to my mind. What do you all think about a rewrite? 206.255.56.241 (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted that material for now (taking it back to the 13 Dec 2007 version), as it didn't have citations and was full of "weasel words" and POV terms. Certainly it needs citations both for the positive and adding any negative that we can back up with reasonable sourcing. Lawikitejana (talk) 11:17, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possibly a rewrite?

message: It would be great if someone could go through and clean this up; TV and album casts are all mixed up (Cicely was not on the album, but Diana Sands and Dick Cavett were, for example.  A track listing of the album would be a good way to go.98.14.181.12 (talk) 13:06, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Track listing

message: Why not Free To Be ... You and Me ? --P64 (talk) 17:46, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: I would argue that the primary topic for this title is actually THE SONG with this name, by the New Seekers.  For some reason though, there isn't yet a Wikipedia article about the song itself, and the disambig links at the top of the article don't clarify this, and neither does the intro of this article....While the song was originally written and performed as a part of this project, the song remains rather well-known to this day, while the project itself no longer is.  So I think most of the people who arrive at this article are looking for info about the song, in particular, and are rather confused when they arrive at an article about a different (albeit related) topic with no prominent mention of, much less a link to an article about, the song! -2003:CA:870A:89E6:4FC:FC02:4896:CBAD (talk) 10:15, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary topic?... 

message: I don't think think so.
Her project was to discourage "make/female gender stereotyping."
It had absolutely nothing to do with "identifying as," which "gender neutrality" strongly implies. I think that sentence in the lede needs a slight rewrite. 70.190.65.59 (talk) 14:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Gender neutrality" ?
Talk:Sky Gilbert

message: * Ten ruminations on an elegy attributed to William Shakespeare (Playwrights Union of Canada, 1997,  has the tag  This number comes from the Toronto Public Library Catalogue  and I verified it at the Vancouver Public Library  as well.  I'll see if I can check out the item in person. Cleduc 18:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ISBN for ''Ruminations''
Talk:Slavko Avsenik

message: The article mentions logging 400,000 miles in one year alone, this equates to cover the distance between Madrid and Amsterdam every single day in a year - obviously this piece of data is in error.
194.249.198.102 (talk) 05:36, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Slavko Štimac

message: There has been a mistake in the article, Stimac is not of Croatian origin. That is to say, he is a Serb born in Gospic, Croatia, but not of Croatian ethnic background.
He is not a serb, neither Štimac is serbian surname. And he was born in a village near Perušić(not Gospić) where serbian population is almost nonexistant. He is maybe the similar case to Ivo Andrić, but he was definetly born in croatian catholic family.93.138.111.95 (talk) 13:21, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Croatian origin
Talk:Slavko Vraneš

message: "and he was the 5th player of the league, including all parametres." -- what does that mean? Thejaysch 23:42, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Vraneš is 2.29m or 7ft6in. All sources leading to 2.26 are out of date, if new then simply not updated from old. He had to pass 2.26 to reach 2.29. Evlekis (Евлекис) 18:20, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's as may be but six years on, we have sources stating 2.30 as well as those that still say 2.29 and 2.26 etc. If you find sources from his boyhood you will probably get readings of 2.10 downward. --OJ (talk) 08:33, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Man what are you doing??? Most reliable sources and almost all list him as 2.29 cm. And they are not outdated... he played last season in the Adriatic league and per their official website he is 2.29 cm, and also Euroleague.net list him with that height. And that are most reliable sources.--Bozalegenda (talk) 20:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources are not "out of date" but based on out of date information. You can still find sources that state 2.26. No source here is particularly special, but for what it's worth they are all pretty much equal from what I know. On a personal note (not intended to influence article), you know that people of this man's height are not exactly out of the ordinary in ex-Yu, least of all where Slavko is from. My own background is sport and we have one older man in a certain village on the outskirts of Mostar and he stands 2.30 himself and he and Slavko (who are associated) are bang on the same. I know for a fact he has surpassed 2.29. Anyhow, if we are to move forward we have two options. One is the unprecedented "2.29, or 2.30" with sources, the other is to present our sources for a third opinion and go with that decision. I won't challenge further if it goes to 2.29. But at the moment I cannot allow for what I know to be wrong based on "one source says this, the other says that". --OJ (talk) 16:26, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height
Talk:From Elvis in Memphis

message: In the Recording section, reference is made to Elvis starting on February 13th, then later reference to recording continuing January 14th, 15th.  Which month is correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.189.128.13 (talk) 12:30, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recording section - Month? 
Talk:From the 27th State

message: To IllaZilla: It's all very well to say that no mention of Recess Theory changing their name is needed since the Recess Theory wikilink links to the Legends of Rodeo page, but since neither a Recess Theory or Legends of Rodeo page actually exists, this is rather useless to anyone looking at the article. Furthermore, since (in my opinion at least) the only thing that really makes Recess Theory "noteworthy" is the fact that they appear on this EP with Further Seems Forever, who are better known but hardly a household name, it seems pretty unlikely there will ever be a Recess Theory page. This is the reason that I made mention of their name change, as it might be of interest to anyone who's looking for information about the band after investigating the EP, but the information is not available anywhere else on Wikipedia.
Anyway, I'm not going to modify the page further, it hardly seems worth the argument, but I suggest to you that it might worth putting the information back in. Geekdog (talk) 17:08, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds reasonable to me. I don't really know anything about Recess Theory/Legends of Rodeo, so I wasn't sure if there was an article about them or ever would be. --IllaZilla (talk) 19:57, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I modified the track listing a bit, put some lengths in and changed the layout slightly after looking at some other split EP pages since I've not been able to find any guidelines. Hope that's okay. Geekdog (talk) 17:56, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recess Theory