Talk:Auricularia auricula-judae

message: Is "Peziza" a former name for this? Badagnani 11:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. That only took three years to answer :) Sasata (talk) 22:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Peziza

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 10:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: as it can be cooked to jelly like
--124.78.208.251 (talk) 10:39, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collagen content in the fungi...??? 

message: Could someone who knows what they're doing straighten out the Bibliography section? There's an unrelated fragment about some sort of medical tests in there. It is totally out of context, and is obviously not the entire statement anyway.
Thanks
Carolina de Witte  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.0.180.248 (talk) 21:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, article still needs a lot of work though. Someday... Sasata (talk) 22:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography section needs reworking 

message: I'll jot notes and other random stuff about the article as we prep for FAC: Sasata (talk) 08:16, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *...and I just remembered I own this, which has a nice section on the species, including nutritional content. Will add details soon. Sasata (talk) 08:38, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

text: I do prefer my own referencing style (I think it's more familiar to most people, especially as it gives full names where possible) but we can switch if you feel it would be beneficial. I think more on its distribution would be a plus (the tropics issue, and is it found in South America?). The description is currently a little short, but I think it's got everything. Also, I was toying with the idea of sending :File:Auricularia auriculajudae 107928.jpg to FPC- it would be the first nomination of my own work, do you think it would have a chance? J Milburn (talk) 10:22, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *Any objections to list defined refs? About the picture, I'm not sure, tbh. Some might complain that there's not enough of the surface in fine focus, or that the composition isn't eye-catching enough, or that it doesn't look enough like an "ear". I may just be being overly pessimistic though; I thought my last submission (Gyromitra infula) was a shoe-in, but after having it shot down by Noodle, I see imperfections in photos everywhere I look. Don't let my photographic cynicism stop you from taking a run through the gauntlet, though :) Sasata (talk) 15:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

text: *Microscopic features needs a bit of expansion, as there's some characteristics are used to distinguish this from other similar species. This has some details that should be summarized in a sentence or three. Sasata (talk) 17:19, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Towards FAC 

message: @J Milburn: Perhaps you have as much right to remove the link as I do to add it. I suppose my thought that the link to the pharmacological section in the lead might be useful was that it would have been helpful to myself when I came across this article and first read it. The arrow link is discreet and links to a section of useful references from an intro that might feel to the reader to be a bold set of claims on first reading. The whole point of wiki pages is that useful links can be embedded in appropriate places. Just because there is no precedence doesn't mean it's not a good idea... 88.111.18.177 (talk) 16:56, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It perhaps is a good idea, but if we were to use it, it seems clear that we would have to do it to every part of the lead, not just the last part. It's not something I'd feel comfortable doing straight off the bat- we have no guidelines on the subject. However, we do have guidelines on lead sections, and lead sections are meant to summarise the content in the article. That's what this lead does. I think your issue may be with lead sections generally rather than this particular lead. J Milburn (talk) 19:51, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to sub-section in lead 

message: I assume that at least the value for iron (185mg/100g) is
much to high. Other dried mushrooms have much less (0.3-10mg),
also the value for the similar species 'Auricularia polytricha',
'Jew's ear, (pepeao), raw' NDB No: 11228 in the usda database
http://www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search/
for the fresh one is much less. It has 0.56mg iron/100g.
A factor of 20 for water loss (look at protein values) 
gives 11mg/100g for a dried variant.
 
Since i have no access to the source book i can't check that.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Büttner (talk • contribs) 13:29, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nutritional values 

message: There's a lot of folklore being cited in this article with little qualification. Until I read this article, I'd thought Cercis siliquastrum was the tree that Judas was supposed to have hung  himself on. Apparently elder is also a candidate, but no tree is actually specified in the Bible. I've never seen an elder large/stout enough to permit a hanging, but if folklore says that where Judas hung himself, that's what folklore says. Harding's Mushroom Miscellany appears to be the source for most of this, but I'd like to see that reference treated a little more skeptically.  Harding is also the source for most of the claims that A. auricula-judae prefers on elder, especially the statement "In up to 90% of cases, the mushroom is found on elder". I'm disputing this. If you expect to find the fungus on a particular species of plant, you probably will find it mostly growing there. Has the preference of the fungus really been demonstrated scientifically? I have a guide to Midwestern US mushrooms that suggests A. auricula-judae prefers shagbark hickory and elms. Elders may also be a favored substrate, but a specific preference for elders exclusively appears to be folklore as well. This article also mentions the prevalence of A. auricula-judae in Eucalyptus forests in Australia.Plantdrew (talk) 06:39, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's pretty clearly not true that Judas hung himself on elder; that just a piece of European folklore. Harding is probably talking about the prevalence of the species on elder in the UK, but, from a purely anecdotal perspective, I'd say that was untrue. I accept the claim that it's actually found on a great number of substrates, and elder is just one of them; other sources back that up. I'll have a look through the article and see if I can tone down the elder rhetoric at some point. Thanks for your comment! J Milburn (talk) 10:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folklore; Judas hanging and preference of the fungus for elder 

message: ... see . Sasata (talk) 17:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow. I'll make incorporating this information an early priority. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:14, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Auricularia auricula-judae'' now split into three species 

message: not edible when raw
I eat it raw (wet state) all the time, e.g., with ketchup. Jidanni (talk) 00:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  not edible when raw?? 

message: Hello, i didnt really find the artists impression, of the Escariot corpse, to be particularly informative about the mushroom.  In fact, if i wanted any details about Escariot, at all which did not somehow, relate to the mushroom, especially a daydream of how someones eyeballs look when they attract crows, i'd have went to Judas Escariot.  213.233.132.130 (talk) 13:37, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an important part of the story of the fungus, and adds an unusual human-interest aspect to the article. I agree that gore for gore's sake will not be part of a good article, but this is fine art by a famous nineteenth century painter. Josh Milburn (talk) 16:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The dead Escariot getting his eyes and soft tissues ripped while he begins to rot, dangling from the tree 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Auricularia auricula-judae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120311170828/http://www.anancy.org/documents/file_en/40-e-2005-mushrom_screen.pdf to http://www.anancy.org/documents/file_en/40-e-2005-mushrom_screen.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718164609/http://www.cefe.cnrs.fr/subnamed/pdf/rapior/Francia1999IJMMCardiovascular.pdf to http://www.cefe.cnrs.fr/subnamed/pdf/rapior/Francia1999IJMMCardiovascular.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725153841/http://www.cfc2010.org/2005/CFC%20pdfs/MApetorgbor.pdf to http://www.cfc2010.org/2005/CFC%20pdfs/MApetorgbor.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article claims the mushroom is called wood ear, but the wood ear article claims that the terminology refers to more mushrooms than just this one. --Kaledomo (talk) 14:56, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The disambiguation on chinese wikipedia says "木耳通常指的是黑木耳", meaning "Ordinarily, the term `wood ear' refers to the black wood ear (auricularia auricula-judae)". I don't know whether the term "black wood ear" is actually used in English, tho. If it is, it would be good to include it. Zekelayla (talk) 22:12, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

text: It looks like there is a fair amount of use of the more precise term "black wood ear" in English. Zekelayla (talk) 22:33, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wood ear naming 

message: The article states not edible when raw, citing a book I do not own as source.  However, most books on the subject list it as being either edible raw, or do not comment on its raw edibility at all.
I suggest the source listing it as inedible when raw is an error. 2A02:C7F:68F1:1A00:6D0C:2E66:3D9E:4938 (talk) 21:30, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not edible when raw 

message: Shouldn't the Chinese language variant be moved to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auricularia_heimuer since it describes 黑木耳？ Mykohsu (talk) 21:42, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does the Chinese language variant describe a different species?