lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Disulfide

message: Shouldn't the first paragraph state that they're a part of tertiary and quaternary structure, not secondary and tertiary?
Thedudester09 (talk) 18:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Complicated and depends on how you ask the question and what you are after.  You probably do not mean the question the way that you phrased it.  A lot depends on how you think that thiols "bind to metals"?--Smokefoot (talk) 01:30, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

message: The following seems too technical for inclusion in this article. --Smokefoot (talk) 00:38, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems noncontroversial.  Thanks for doing this.  --Smokefoot (talk) 17:04, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

text: agreed, good idea V8rik (talk) 17:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. I've had to reorganize things a little and the whole page still needs work, there's a great lack of in-line citations. --Project Osprey (talk) 08:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: For some unknown reason, Editors are writing rubbish as if it was fact. The section on Inorganic Disulfides claims "Sulfur is usually assigned to the reduced oxidation number -2...". Aside from the fact that it is the (theoretical, hypothetical) oxidation number that is assigned to the element (and not the other way around), it just. isn't. true. Sulfur commonly can be found in the 0, -2, and +6 formal oxidation states in nature. Millions of tonnes of gypsum are mined every year, gypsum is Calcium sulfate (+6). Pyrite (Fool's Gold) is the most common of the sulfide minerals, and sulfur's formal oxidation number is -1 there (Fe is NOT commonly found in the +4 Ox. State which is what would be required if S was in the (not so common) -2 state. I could go on, and on, and on. I'm not even sure (citation required) that in organic chemistry the -2 state is more common that the +6 state (in terms of industrial organic chemicals).174.130.70.61 (talk) 17:55, 5 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry
Talk:Archival appraisal

message: There's no citations to much of the information cited here :(.Efkeathley 23:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm thinking this article requires a more complete list of appraisal theories but less of a dichotomy since macro appraisal and documentation strategy are more in agreement with each other than say the Black Box and Functional Analysis. I'd define micro versus macro appraisal and how they relate to Functional Analysis, Boles and Young's Black Box, and reappraisal as a part of collection management. Thoughts? Levelistchampion (talk) 20:38, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Undue weight?

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:36, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians. As the de facto steward of this wonderful page, I made some substantial edits to this page in hopes of making it better, including two images from other articles on the same topic and the best image on archival appraisal I could find from Wikimedia. I hope others can add information about Carol Couture, François Burgy, and Daniel Ducharme mentioned in the German-language article. That would be appreciated. Historyhermann1993 (talk) 18:47, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: New changes as of May 1, 2019
Talk:Avid Home Entertainment

message: Already? Do you call re-releases of motion pictures on tape in SLP mode non-notable? I mean, seriously, I'll be looking for good ways to put Avid on the map via Google. --Ryanasaurus0077 23:20, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About the nomination

message: Quit being stupid.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hunington-Horstachio (talk • contribs) 02:40, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: About you
Talk:RAF Honiley

message: I don't have any reliable sources so I'm not putting anything in the article proper, but for information of anyone developing this article further I worked at this site from approx Sept 1974 to approx April 1977 when it was (and had been for some years) owned by Girling, part of the Joseph Lucas group. There was a 2-storey block on the site housing offices, laboratories and motor workshops, and the former runways were used as a vehicle test track. As I recall there was an oval-shaped track around the site and a central straight track, the middle 100metre or so long section of which was covered in an epoxy compound which could be sprayed with water from the sides of the track to make a slippery "low-mu" surface for testing brakes in ice/snow-like conditions. The main purpose of the facility at the time was developing the company's anti-skid braking products for cars, commercial vehicles and railway wagons.
John Stumbles (talk) 22:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Girling (Lucas) developments labs and test track 
Talk:Tzufit Grant

message: Her details of her husband are out of date. Can someone with knowledge update the entire article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.25.171 (talk) 00:18, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs an update 

message: This article seems like a possible case of WP:BLP1E to me. Notability is not inherited from her husband; in order to be notable enough for a Wikipedia article, she should be the subject of significant coverage in her own right. It doesn't help that this article gives a pretty negative impression of her; are statements about drinking urine and bathing in chocolate really suitable for a Wikipedia biography? Robofish (talk) 20:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there is any question pertaining to her notability. She has acted in at least two feature films, and hosted her own TV show. —Ynhockey (Talk) 05:04, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notabililty?
Talk:Schematic Records

message: This article reads like a promotion piece. I mean, I like phoenicia as much as anyone else, but this does not follow wikipedia guidlines. It is extrememly unencylopedic. Someone please rewrite the obviously problematic parts. Not to mention, this article should probably redirect to the Phoenecia article, or have more info about Schematic Records itself rather than just being all about Phoenecia and Soul Oddity. Brentt 23:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Eritrean political parties

message: How useful is this template? --Merhawie 23:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very. The template is part of a series of templates on political parties in countries. Even countries with only one or without any party have such a template and these templates will be combined into an overview of political parties by continent. When all African boxes are ready, I will create this overview page for Africa. There was a discussion on deletion of similar templates (without parties), whereby the decision was to keep the template. Electionworld Talk? 11:59, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose?
Talk:Bang Bang (Dubliner)

message: Please don't delete. This article needs some work but Bang Bang was a real and beloved character in Dublin. One (unverified) idea is that his mental illness resulted in his service in the first world war. There are many references to him in Irish culture and histories of the middle of the twentieth century. Perhaps someone could help this article?  Rpersse 23:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm very glad to see that this article wasn't deleted. He was a very well-known character, with a much higher profile than many politicians. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Keep

message: years ago when this article was up for deletion, I took up the matter with the long-term newspaper seller (now gone) on Wicklow St. Andrew St. corner.
He said I could get enough proof to retain this article in one of the pubs on Thomas St. which has some photos of bang bang in action hanging up. I honestly didn't get a chance to get up there if anyone cares to take up the challenge I'll make the effort now as I see the article lacks and deserves a visual still.
I saw bang-bang myself as a kid c. 1966  - it was quite novel, the whole public atmosphere changed - lots of laughing and shooting, he was quite theatrical  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.45.121.97 (talk) 00:00, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Dublin City Library and Archive is collecting stories about ‘Bang Bang’ to add to our archive. If you have any memories of ‘Bang Bang’, please submit your story at www.dublincitypubliclibraries.com  - or alternatively by email to cityarchives@dublincity.ie.  Lugnad (talk) 14:09, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  MORE PROOF AVAILABLE 

message: I too remember Bang Bang and only last year learnt that his real name was Thomas Dudley. I have lived in Australia for most of my life and have also written a song about him. As you say - he was well-loved character.175.38.200.46 (talk) 03:08, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bang Bang 
Talk:USS Guide (AM-447)

message: “USS Guide (AM-447/MSO-447) was an Aggressive-class minesweeper acquired by the U.S. Navy for the task of removing mines that had been placed in the water to prevent the safe passage of ships.” Now, this really isn't my field, but ... are there really minesweepers that don't have the task of removing mines placed in the water to prevent the safe passage of ships? almost-instinct 22:51, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tautology
Talk:List of rivers of Dakshina Kannada and Udupi districts

message: I propose that we rename this category as "Tulunadu rivers" lest we invite the same attention that the "Dakshina Kannada and Udupi stubs" category is getting i.e. proposal for deletion.
Hari 23:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Loet Leydesdorff

message: Due to possible violation of copyright, see WP:Copyvio, I have removed the worksection of this article for now. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 09:00, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worksection removed 
Talk:Bars Bolud Jinong

message: Basic information to add to this article:  where was Bars Bolud Jinong, and where was his capital (where did he rule from)? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article
Category talk:Wikis

message: There seems to be confusion amongst the wiki categories. Some wikis (Goowiki, International Music Score Library Project, etc) are listed in :Category:Wiki. Some other wikis are in :Category:Wikis and/or :Category:Wiki communities. What is the difference between (a) wikis in “Category:Wikis” and (b) wikis in “Category:Wiki communities”? --EarthFurst 00:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mariko-juku

message: I've often seen this referred to as Maruko-juku. Is that an alternate reading/spelling, or just a typo/misconception? Thanks. LordAmeth (talk) 14:01, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maruko? 
Talk:Airfix

message: I noticed in the section that lists the products produced by Airfix, especially that of 'Figures', is heavily dated. The majority of these sets have not been produced for quite a while, i.e. the Arabs mentioned, and the description of the Combat Sets, of which only two are still being sold, is incorrect. However, as I don't quite trust my own knowledge, I have refrained from putting in possibly wrong information. 86.172.174.9 (talk) 08:55, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The "Model kit product ranges" section isn't intended to list only the current product range, but historical ones as well. Maybe this should be made clear in the article. Regards, Letdorf (talk) 10:49, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree. Only the main or significant products should be listed in the article though; if a more comprehensive list is collated, it should be in a separate (but related) "list-type" article. Regards, DPdH (talk) 09:07, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very Dated Information 

message: Should there be a paragraph about the club? I was a member, and they sent you a badge, coupons and a welcome letter from club president, Dick Emery.
For badge, see: http://www.flickr.com/photos/23885771@N03/4364181577/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gingerpig2000 (talk • contribs) 17:49, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: If verifiable information about the club can be used (and cited), it should be OK to add a small section about it. Regards, DPdH (talk) 09:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airfix Modelers Club 
Talk:Veritas File System

message: The references to "terabytes" & "exabytes" should probably be changed to "tebibytes" & "exbibytes".  File system size limits are generally binary not decimal numbers.  See Terabyte (referenced in the article).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.180.152.36 (talk) 16:26, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SI vs. Binary prefixes in file system sizes 

message: The article states that it's the first commercial journal filesystem. There's a link at the bottom of the page for comparisons, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems and that page clearly states that JFS1, from IBM, was the first.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.82.9.74 (talk) 21:21, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see the link (and unsurprisingly, much of the comparison page simply goes to unsourced notes).  I looked for comparisons of initial release dates online, but was unable to find a reliable source for dates earlier than in this article.  If you have a reliable cite, you should add it Tedickey (talk) 21:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I don't have a cite, but we had JFS in the lab 1987 or 1988, and it shipped in 1990 as part of AIXv3  I do remember the guys talking nervously about Veritas, they seemed not to like something. linas (talk) 20:49, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims on the first journaling filesystem
Talk:Veritas Volume Manager

message: Note that the VxVM 3.1 release date is unlikely to have been August 2002 as the page currently states. The 3.5 version released in August 2002, and the 3.2 version released circa 2000.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.172.227 (talk) 20:16, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Boeing P-29

message: That MIGHT be an (early) NACA cowl in the second picture, but the first picture definitely appears to be a Townend ring, so the text shouldn't say that ALL P-29' used NACA cowls instead of Townend rings, because obviously some didn't..45Colt 20:09, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  NACA vs Townend cowl 
Talk:Wedell-Williams XP-34

message: If we can wait a bit some accurate depictions of the XP-34 will be supplied. Keep in mind that any images that are posted will soon be picked up by the Google indexes and be on the general internet quickly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.64.28.159 (talk) 13:58, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no other images available and the only one that is presently on the web shows gross inaccuracies; until another one surfaces, this will have to suffice. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:11, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  XP-34 Images and Artwork
Talk:International Committee for Information Technology Standards

message: I included a section discussing the curves developed by the committees.  My main focus was to include information on the CBEMA curve.  This was incentivized when I was reading the Power Quality article that had a link to the CBEMA curve.  After clicking the link to the article, I realized that Wikipedia did not discuss the curve at all so I decided to include it.
I also altered the link from the Power Quality article to link to the "CBEMA Curve" subsection instead of just being redirected to this article under "CBEMA".
- Transientb on Wednesday, November 27, 2013
I am about to make some changes for which I lack
complete knowledge.
Perhaps someone with better information can 
continue the improvement.
Walter Nissen  2007-09-25  1:03
05:10, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Songshan–Xindian line

message: The symbols in "Operation" column mean that there are three operation mode in green line now. Maybe my English is not good enough to make native English speaker know this.--Bhenry1990 (talk) 09:25, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Operation 
Talk:Crestview High School (Florida)

message: Don't forget the band is also going to Hawaii in 2008. Jake 01:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Band tours
Talk:Liebig's law of the minimum

message: "Liebig's law of minimum" should redirect here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.102.250.225  (talk • contribs) 
The equation as it is now,
: \frac{dO}{dt} = min \left( \frac{I}{k_{I} + I}, \frac{N}{k_{N} + N}, \frac{P}{k_{P} + P} \right) 
is incorrect. To see this, check that the  left hand side has the dimension of population size per time, while the right hand side is dimensionless. Even if this equation has been non-dimensionalized, it doesn't make sense for several reasons: population growth doesn't depend on population size, populations always increase in size, even for the minutest food densities. I'll change it to
: \frac{dO}{dt} = O\left(min \left( \frac{\mu_I I}{k_{I} + I}, \frac{\mu_N N}{k_{N} + N}, \frac{\mu_P P}{k_{P} + P} \right) -m\right)   —Preceding unsigned comment added by OpenScience (talk • contribs) 10:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, I've removed that section as nonsense. Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 08:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It cannot be assumed that all nutrients have an equal value which this formula presumes. If the value between several nutrients varies in relative importance, the two end nodes are not necessarily equal or tantamount to one another and cannot be presumed to be... The numerical equivalence of the statement in the Applications Section is that all nutrients are of the same value between one another in context and if that is the real rule of science, then shouldn't it imply other rules of contingency as well? Stevenmitchell (talk) 09:58, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Nutrients are not all equal
Talk:NFL Replay

message: Does the network announce which games will be shown on NFL Replay at which time slots?  Please update the site with info on when and where these announcements are made. 
Kenbrey 01:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Huvadhu Atoll

message: The following seems to be a prank contributed by User:Mohonu:
:"Its placement on the main sea route around southern India meant this atoll had various contact with mariners travelling the route. It was during one of these voyages that the Scottish explorer Sir Fergus Woodward, according to British shipping reports, was marooned on one of the islands of Gaafu Dhaalu Atoll. Captured in southern India in 1791 by the powerful Baron Jarren of Burns, he was apparently abandoned with a single blunt blade. Descriptions of his escape from the island are colourful, but it appears the most likely explanation is that he swam from island to island till coming into contact with locals who traded with sailors. It was this act of desertion which Sir Fergus recorded in his journal as the moment which "hath inspired in mine heart the evening starr of destruction which shall wipe away the ugliness exposed by day," and provoked his Sunset Crusade."
It is of a piece with prank insertions made between 1 and 15 February 2007 by User:Woofe705, who also made bogus edits at Gaafu Dhaalu Atoll, all introducing the apparently invented "Sir Fergus Woodward, the Scottish explorer". Also, there is no "Baron Jarren of Burns." I am asking User:Mohonu how this "information" was come by. --Wetman 01:39, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't the map image be rotated 90 degrees anticlockwise? I don't know how to do this, or i would... Millichip (talk) 15:05, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Map of Huvadhu
Talk:Smooth coarea formula

message: Gallot, Hulin, and Lafontaine, in Riemannian Geometry, 2nd edition () state Lemma 4.73, a "coarea formula".
: Let ƒ be a smooth positive function on a compact Riemannian manifold (M,g). Then
::\begin{align}
 \int_M f v_g &= \int_{0}^{\sup f} \mathrm{vol}_n f^{-1}([t,+\infty[) \, dt \qquad \text{and} \\
 \int_M |df|v_g &= \int_{0}^{\sup f} \mathrm{vol}_{n -1}(f^{-1}(t)) \, dt .
\end{align}
It appears that vg is a canonical measure, something like a Haar measure; and of course "[t,+∞[" means the same as "[t,+∞)". They cite Burago & Zalgaller, Geometric inequalities (), p. 103 for a more general version. (Unfortunately, that page is not available at Amazon books.)
The theorem in this article is more general, but would seem to have the same flavor. Bad news: no location in the Chavel text is given, and a search for "coarea" in Amazon's version did not show this theorem. Good news: User  who created this article is most likely the same Carlos Beltrán (a recent PhD from Universidad de Cantabria, now a postdoc at University of Toronto) who coauthored a paper published this year in Mathematics of Computation (v.76,n.259,pp.1393–1424), and essentially this theorem does appear in that peer-reviewed paper citing a different source. --KSmrqT 01:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related 

message: Normal Jacobian is not defined in the Jacobian-page. It should probably be defined here in an invariant way. I don't have an adequate reference at hand Lapasotka (talk) 02:05, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Normal Jacobian 

message: One needs M and N orientable so that the integrals are defined.
Also, there is a more general (and usable) version for functions 
that are not neccessary positive, but compactly supported instead.
A reference is the book Le Spectre d'une Variété Riemannienne by
Berger-Gauduchon-Mazet (Proposition A.III.5 on p. 16) in the
special case where F is a Riemannian submersion, from which the
general case in the article easily follows.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Upmeier (talk • contribs) 11:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrections
Talk:Flapjacks from the Sky

message: Nothing was copied from that page, heck, there's pretty much nothing on this page to have been copied over. The tracklist, though not taken from there either, can't not be inherently similar. --IRua 01:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CorenSearchBot is in error

message: I found a 2004 New York Times article that says the album has near nationwide radio exposure. A program director at Sirius is mentioned in the article as a supporter of the band. But it doesn't directly say that Sirius was playing songs form the album. That may fall slightly short of WP:NALBUMS.
I also found a review from AllMusic. I found a reference on Amazon and elsewhere that Americana UK said, "9 out of 10 - Love at first spin!" But I haven't found anything directly from Americana UK. As it stands now, the AllMusic review is the only one cited in the article. Again, this falls short of the multiple reviews needed for notability in the guidelines.
A reasonable smell test makes this album look like it is notable enough to merit its own article. But I don't edit album articles much. Perhaps someone who does ought to voice an opinion. For now, I've left the notability hatnote in the article. Taxman1913 (talk) 22:10, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Flintstone House

message: I added all the images to :commons:Category:Flintstone House so they would be easier to find. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 21:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Commons category