lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Samy and Sandra Sandoval

message: Who started this discussion page on Samy y Sandra? (The post was not signed) I agree, Samy y Sandra are fanatically popular in Central and South America, throughout all of Latin America, and are well known and popular in the USA, and Europe. 
Considering how popular they are, it was terribly difficult to find ANY information on their lives, the history of their careers, or even their date of birth. I apologize for using Blog pages as citations for referenced external websites. In some cases, these pages were the ONLY external link I could find when referencing information vital to a basic biography. 
If anyone is able to find better external links or perhaps has access to their book, a biography Samy and Sandra, the Story written by Sergio Pérez Saavedra, please make the necessary contributions.
--irshgrl500 (talk) 14:00, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: June 5, 2009
Talk:Nasir Hussain

message: There was also an actor called Nasir Hussain, who played character roles, specially of the father or senior family patriarch. His imdb link is given here | imdb link. He was very prominent in the 60's and 70's. Having a total of over 130 films to his credit. If anyone has details about him or links with some biographical details of this actor please do help creating an article for him. Haphar 10:41, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Two Nasir Hussains
Talk:Stewartby

message: I'm not sure that the reference to 'dirty old men' is appropriate!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.152.222.17 (talk) 23:14, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some of the information duplicates the London Brick Company and could possibly be trimmed down. Crookesmoor (talk) 10:20, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brickworks
Talk:Friar Laurence

message: This Brother Cadafel or whatever seems to be the subject of another article. Isn't it a bit irrelevant?--BeastKing89 06:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brother who? 

message: The references are wrong, I think for act 2, scene 3. 75.84.79.173 (talk) 02:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  references 

message: Why is there an entire paragraph in the analysis dedicated to Rosaline's role in the play? It seems out of place. Lord Seth (talk) 00:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rosaline 

message: I suggest renaming the article to "Friar Lawrence (Romeo and Juliet)" 86.167.143.195 (talk) 18:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename Article 

message: Per discussions at Talk:Romeo and Juliet and talk:Characters in Romeo and Juliet, this article should probably be renamed Friar Lawrence, rather than "Friar Laurence". If there are no objections we should go ahead and move it.--Cúchullain t/c 13:21, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! --GuillaumeTell 00:12, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Laurence

message: Most of the analysis section is relevant to the play, but not to the character. Why is this? Should we remove content this section and/or add information relevant specifically to the character Friar Lawrence? Philmonte101 😊😄😞 (talk) 20:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Analysis section
Category talk:Free speech activists

message: The intent behind this category is to organize and provide access to people by a significant domain of activism. Ultimately, it should be included with other categories, sub-categories, and super-categories relating to information advocacy, including players & modes of activity such as a) advocacy organizations; b) individual activists; c) scholars, theorists & academics; d) governing bodies & codes (censorship boards, ratings codes, licensing rate panels (CARP), etc.); e) awards in the field; and various subjects / domains of information, such as a) free speech; b) privacy; c) intellectual property law; d) norms of sharing and transmitting information and knowledge (gift culture, permissions culture, etc.). --LQ 19:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I fully agree, and great idea with the creation of the category! ;) — Cirt (talk) 21:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: The intent
Talk:Redskins (disambiguation)

message: WP seems to be violating their own NPOV here. A search for "redskins" should go to this disambiguation page the same as any other search on a word with several meanings. I am part Native American, so the word is a racial slur to me, and anyone doing a truly encyclopedic search should be confronted with that fact. Redskin means skinning someone as a trophy, not just a football team. Is WP based on popular opinion or valid research? If so, the article on evolution would contain creationism nonsense.
FigureArtist (talk) 22:45, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The Redskins]] vs [[Washington Redskins]]
Talk:The Wrekin

message: Could some knowledgeable individual please provide any information concerning the geology or provenance of this hill and surrounding area? The article currently (14mar2008) does not explicitly say if this is a natural outcrop, or a construct. Remains of a hillfort are mentioned, but what of the main body of the hill? Why does it project from the plain? The geology of the area is twice stated to be quite interesting, but never described to answer "why".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.58.220 (talk) 23:14, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it certainly isn't a 'man made' hill. Locally it's said to be an extinct volcano, but I don't know how true this is. 84.68.229.34 (talk) 17:02, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've attempted to bring all of the previously separate geological commentary together into one section and tell a coherent story but it could still do with a look by someone familiar with the local geology rather than simply someone (like me!) who understands the principles of geology but is not that acquainted with the locales mentioned. I can confirm that it's not an extinct volcano, except insofar as it is partly formed from volcanic rocks - its shape, just like that of Sugarloaf in south Wales is merely reminiscent of that of a volcano - other natural processes have brought about the potentially similar form.  cheers  Geopersona (talk) 21:26, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Geology

message: Evil hethen palce just liek stone circle. Maybe not mountain, but evil magic their. talk of Tūalf'seni (pron. Too-Alf-Sen-Ear) - apparent holy pagan mountain.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Mitchell%27s_Fold  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.132.139.33 (talk) 21:51, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Evil heathen place, like circle

message: Toghill (Toghill, P. 2006 Geology of Shropshire 2nd edn Crowood Press)
cites an age of 566 million years for this group of rocks - an age which differs by 100 million years from the age presently cited in the article. Geopersona (talk) 05:25, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age of Uriconian Volcanics 

message: The map has Caer Caradoc in completely the wrong place. Caer Caradoc is more northerly than the Clee Hills, and is just east of Church Stretton. 2A02:C7E:3A38:5A00:3F65:C0C8:44CA:1089 (talk) 21:26, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map is wrong 

message: The section on the name "Wrekin" is rather unsatisfactory, giving as it does the surmised origins of the word, but nothing about the meaning... Bibliosporias (talk) 12:55, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:List of index fossils

message: This project probably belongs in either WP Geology or WP Biology.  Since I am not a specialist in either field, I will add this page to WP Geology and hope that an expert can categorize it appropriately. Nimur 17:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject

message: Here is a question i want to know.What makes index fossils useable as time markers in rocks?I have these four conclusions but i don't know which one is the answer,
*A.They are hard to find.
*B.They only lived for about 1 million years.
*C.They were alive for hundreds of millions of years.
*D.They were only found in one location.
 
I need to know which one is the answer,can you please help me?You can e-mail me at (EMAIL REMOVED) with the answer.Thanks for your time.
:I'd suggest reading the article.  It already explains pretty clearly how index fossils are used, and what constitutes a good index fossil (tip: abundant and so easy to find, but only existed for a short period of geological time).  --Plumbago 10:11, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, you probably don't want to include your email on a wikipedia page; it's a ripe target for spammers.  Nimur 16:55, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Homework Question

message: I can't help but wonder what the sentence "Bitches had found them before too." is doing in this article.
:It was WP:Vandalism, and has been removed.  You can help remove vandalism if you spot it!  Use the "Edit This Page" tab.  Nimur 13:27, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear sentence? 

message: Many of the taxa in the table are only local index fossils and certainly not worldwide. Therefore, the table is rather useless: no geographic area has been mentioned.--Tom Meijer (talk) 18:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides, no remark has been made that the application of index fossils is a rather oldfashioned method in biostratigraphy. This should be added. --Tom Meijer (talk) 18:41, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Local index fossils 

message: As said earlier, Index fossils, et. al. is an important concept, much better, if still incompletely, covered in the new redirect target.
The present list is at best misleading. If it is intended as a list of Index species, there are dozens in the Ammonites and Inoceramids of the second half of the Cretaceous alone. It may be safe to say (without actually taking the time to count) that there are hundreds in North America alone.
IveGoneAway (talk) 04:29, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirection of [[Index fossils]] redirect to [[Biostratigraphy#Index fossils|Index fossils]] in [[Biostratigraphy]]
Wikipedia talk:Notice board for India-related topics/It's new

message: I created WP:INBIN as a shortcut to this but dont know how to get the sortcut box.Bakaman Bakatalk 19:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nvm. Got it.Bakaman Bakatalk 19:21, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Help
Talk:Susan Hanson

message: According to the book "Who's who on television" from 1985, she was born on February 11, 1946. There's a geographer named Susan Hanson who was born in 1943, but, according to the Library of Congress, on a different date, which makes a confusion unlikely. So, what's the source for the date mentioned in the article? I noticed the imdb entry, but who came up with it in the first place? --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 11:07, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm no expert on what is and isn't an acceptable source but Susan's son has tweeted thanking everyone for their birthday messages but that her birthday is actually 11th and not the 2nd of February. 82.7.83.113 (talk) 12:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth
Talk:Avon, South Dakota

message: Hey all, I am the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If you would like commentary, just give me a heads up! --Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 04:24, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Padma Bhushan

message: 2008 Padmabhusan list is not complete.
Here is the complete list:
Mian Bashir Ahmed		Public Affairs
Shiv Nadar			Information Technology
Inderjit Kaur			Social Work
P. Susheela			Arts
Lal Shukla			Literature & Education
Amarnath Sehgal (Posthumous)	Arts
Ustad Asad Ali Khan		Arts
Ustad Rahim Fahimuddin Dagar	Arts
Prof. Sushil Kumar Saxena	Arts
Chandrshekhar Dasgupta		Civil Service
K Padmanabhiah 			Civil Service
V Ramachandran			Civil Service
Prof Brijinder Nath Goswamy	Literature & Education
Prof Ji Xianlin (China)		Literature & Education
Prof Kaushik Basu (USA)		Literature & Education
Prof. (Smt.) Padma Desai (USA)	Literature & Education
Ravindra Kelekar		Literature & Education
Dr (Smt.) Shayama Chona		Literature & Education
Dr Srinivasa SR Varadhan	Literature & Education
Prof TK Oommen			Literature & Education
Prof (Dr) Jagjit Singh Chopra	Medicine
Prof Nirmal Kumar Ganguly	Medicine
Lord Meghnad Desai		Public Affairs
Yuli Mikhailovitch Vorontsov (Posthumous)	Public Affairs
Prof Asis Datta			Science & Engineering.
Prof. Sukh Dev			Science & Engineering.
Sunita Williams			Science & Engineering.
Vasant Gowarikar		Science & Engineering.
D. R. Mehta			Social Work
Dominique Lapierre (France)	Social Work
Suresh Kumar Neotia		Trade & Industry
Baba Neelkanth Kalyani		Trade & Industry
K. V. Kamath			Trade & Industry
Vikram Pandit 			Trade & Industry
Jasdev Singh 			Commentary and broadcasting
I am not able to update this in wikipedia...Can anybody update this please?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.200.70 (talk) 21:27, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Ganesh Kumar]] 

message: This article is too long! I suggest splitting this page into several pages with each page containing awardees decade-wise. Jovianeye (talk) 00:10, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have created new pages containing awardees decade-wise Jovianeye (talk) 19:56, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Too Long!
Talk:New Richmond, Wisconsin

message: Similar to many Wikipedia pages, women are underrepresented in the Notable People category for New Richmond, Wisconsin. Mary Sather is notable, happens to be a woman, and should not be deleted. OR maybe we could consider changing the heading to *Notable Men.* Thanks in advance for your consideration.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amylibrarian (talk • contribs)  21:31, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not about sexism; it's about meeting Wikipedia standards. By no stretch of the imagination does Mary Sather meet WP:NBIO; if she did, she'd have her own article. She's already listed seven (7) times in this article. Why are you so adamant that she be listed eight times?? 32.218.38.44 (talk) 02:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women are underrepresented on Wikipedia pages 
Talk:Bushnell, South Dakota

message: I was wondering about the claim of Bushnell being a stronghold of artists. I've lived in Brookings for a few years and have never heard about this. I'll admit that I've only driven through Bushnell once, so I'm by no means an expert. I was just wondering if there was any sources that could be cited to help substantiate this claim. sdgjake 15:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Lethal Enforcers 3

message: Someone ought to add the actual Japanese stage titles.  The current translations are rather dubious.  And also, is there any real reason why the word 警察官 should not be translated as "police officer," but rendered as "keisatsukan?"  It doesn't make sense to me.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.191.41.68 (talk) 19:29, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Oklahoma State University Medical Center

message: This article now meets the requirements for a Start classification. Bruin2 (talk) 15:15, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Harry Johnston

message: Does anyone know/have a source for any family relationship between Harry Johnston and Edward Johnston? And whether this connection was what led to Eric Gill undertaking the memorial panel for Harry J? Any suggestions/sources gratefully received. KJP1 (talk) 13:03, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relations and Eric Gill 

message: :
What does it mean to manipulate a language? —Tamfang (talk) 19:02, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  manipulation
Talk:Warner, South Dakota

message: According to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=memRHo1ia7I (Learning the Social Sciences: The Children's Blizzard or The School House Blizzard: January 12, 1888 Deadly Disaster at 7:57), the school teacher and all the pupils died in the January 12, 1888 Children's Blizzard. Kdammers (talk) 21:26, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:USB toy

message: I wanted to create a page for all the USB or office toys which seem to have become an everyday part of office life.The products were supplied by the guys at [Home gadgets].There is a link to wiki commons where we can collect images of these toys.
The article is fairly spartan at the moment but hope to beef it up over the next few weeks.
Any help would be appreciated.
Collieman 19:40, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Many of these devices violate USB specifications, in that they immediately attempt to draw the maximum power - a device is supposed to start by drawing not more than 100 mA and then "request" an increase from the host. I don't have a source for this right now, but if one can be found it should be added. M0ffx (talk) 12:53, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violating USB spec 

message: The other article is somewhat stronger than the stub here, but the title USB toy seems more descriptive and more recognizable. There seems to be little reason to maintain the distinction and two separate articles. In terms of Google hits:
*"USB toy": 144,000
*"USB decoration": 5,980
*"USB gadget": 441,000 (but this includes "Linux-USB Gadget API Framework", an unrelated topic)
*"USB gadget" -driver -kernel -linux -api : 435,000 
"USB gadget" is a possible name, but would have to be disambiguated from the software operating system driver meaning of the term.
Reify-tech (talk) 14:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Will it include anything that uses power transmission, but no data transmission? Are these all "toys"? Eldizzino (talk) 17:33, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[USB decoration]]
Talk:Small-signal model

message: The page has no example of the linearization procedure, and the section on notation seems gratuitous. Brews ohare (talk) 17:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a lot of sympathy for the comment, "This page does not make a lot of sense."  I teach the subject in the context of university-level undergraduate engineering.  However the section headed, "Variable notation" is exactly what students want as a handy reference.  There are a few places throughout the article where the use of the phrase "large signal" is confusing or ambiguous, so I'm going to make a few edits to resolve those ambiguities.  A large signal is not necessarily constant with respect to time and it is not a component that can be superimposed on a small signal to get a total signal.  A large signal is a signal that in its context, reveals non-linear behavior of the circuit and thus the small-signal theory cannot be used. Doug iowa (talk) 17:28, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: This page does not make a lot of sense

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small_signal_model and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Small-signal_model exist  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.179.200.230 (talk) 19:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: strange
Talk:Rafiq Jaber

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- -- Thesocialistesq/M.Lesocialiste 19:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: This claim "an Islamist organization which was shut down by the U.S. Government as being a front for the terrorist group Hamas" is not supported by the citation (which is itself not reliable), nor is it consistent with the content of the IAC wiki page. Seeing as this is an unsupported, inflammatory claim on the biography of a living person, I'm going to remove it. Glaucus (talk) 17:34, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Front for terrorist org
Category talk:Faculty by university or college in the United States

message: What are the criteria for applying this category?  Current?  Former?  Prominently associated with that faculty?  Do visiting scholars and associate faculty who didn't get tenure apply?  What about adjuncts who are prominent for their private practice/work & happen to adjunct at this or that university? I bring this up because I was looking at the entry for Karl Llewellyn, who out of 6 substantive categories, had 4 that reflected affiliations with various schools. 2 faculty; 2 degrees; 2 birth/death.  I added the generic american academics category & it should probably be more substantive, like american legal academics. But there were no substantive categories that tied him to academia or field of study or accomplishments.  Just affililation categories.  Such lists could go on ad infinitum for academics with long or well-travelled careers.  So, I would propose that there be some sort of criteria established about when an affiliation is notable enough to be included as a category, and when an affiliation is itself not-notable. (Or maybe there are, and we should link to them at the top of this page.) --LQ 19:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This has been done with the alumni by college or university, but there are lots of schools with alumni categories but not faculty.  California has been broken off, so should we just break off states piece meal, or disperse every state at once?Johnpacklambert (talk) 00:07, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Should we split the category by state

message: What is clear is that current and former faculty both apply.  The person does not need to be prominently associated with the institution.  For example, John Quincy Adams is in the category Harvard University faculty, even though that is not considered one of his largest contributions.  Harvard though has a huge number of people who might with other institutions count as faculty in the category "Harvard University staff" because faculty has a clear definition at Harvard.  I have created staff categories for a few other large and prominent institutions in the United States, but there are still ambiguities.Johnpacklambert (talk) 00:31, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rules for inclusion

message: Just wondering if adjunct professors are considered faculty? XOttawahitech (talk) 20:48, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should adjunct professors be added to this category?
Talk:Science and technology/Archive 1

message: Based on discussions, the article should simply be something like the following:
:Science and technology is a term of art used to encompass the relationship between science and technology. It was first used (citation of first use) and frequently appears within titles of academic disciplines (science and technology studies) and government offices (Office of Science and Technology). 
But without a proper discussion of the term's history and usage, this might be little more than a dictionary definition. (Proper citations would be necessary, of course, to avoid original research).  --ZimZalaBim (talk) 15:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Yes.  I have used your suggestion to make a change to the article for it to better express its purpose.  As I mentioned in the deletion discussion, it is probably easier to get this article going in the right direction than start again when someone else recreates it.  There is still a lot of work to be done.  --  MCG 15:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *In the 6 years since these discussions took place, it might be beneficial to take another crack at this. The Internet has grown signficantly since then, and there might be more resources available to develop this article in order to support its existence. Jodayagi (talk) 17:42, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version