Talk:Perfect Master

message: Many people have use the term "Perfect Master". Rather than attempt to explain the variations between all these people as it pertains to definitions given, let's leave that to the articles about these persons. ≈ jossi  ≈ t • @ 15:40, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Usually disambiguation pages are used to link to different articles that have the same title to help people find the one they meant. For instance db templates usually read "for other uses of the term..." In this case it was assuming everyone knew what a 'perfect master' is and linked to so-and-so's term for that concept. That sounds more like adding ambiguity than removing it. Change it back if you don't agree. In truth only the Meher Baba article and the Masonic article use this term at all. Shamak (talk) 23:42, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old comment

message: The following is from Wikipedia:Disambiguation:
====Partial title matches====
Do not add links that merely contain part of the page title, or links that include the page title in a longer proper name, where there is no significant risk of confusion. Only add links to articles that could use essentially the same title as the disambiguated term. Disambiguation pages are not search indices.
Tommytocker (talk) 17:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think this page is a disambiguation page anymore. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 17:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what you mean. Above you say " The term should be kept in a disambig page and not linked to any specific article." to which I replied "Okay" thinking we had come to an agreement by my accepting your opinion. Tommytocker (talk) 17:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I corrected my comment. See above ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 18:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why have an edit war over something so straight forward? 

message: Do not add links that merely contain part of the page title, or links that include the page title in a longer proper name, where there is no significant risk of confusion. Only add links to articles that could use essentially the same title as the disambiguated term. Disambiguation pages are not search indices.
Tommytocker (talk) 17:14, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think this page is a disambiguation page anymore. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 17:31, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what you mean. Above you say " The term should be kept in a disambig page and not linked to any specific article." to which I replied "Okay" thinking we had come to an agreement by my accepting your opinion. Tommytocker (talk) 17:35, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I corrected my comment. See above ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 18:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: <span id="Lists" ></span>Partial title matches

message: Shouldn't Divine Light Mission go at the top? Sort on the D, yes, not the M? (I'm assuming Meher Baba is an M, not a B for sorting?)
: Not really. The name of the person starts with "P". But it is no big deal. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 15:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alpha Sort

message: Hey, This page needs fleshing out! Incarnation seems like a good model to follow. Also see Rainbow flag. These are pages where there are several senses for different cultures just like this one and yet they go into depth and often have another page they link to for further details on top of it. I have read a lot of the recent discussions here and at Perfect Master (Meher Baba) and Meher Baba and this is silly. Wikipedia is for everyone to edit and this information ought not be hiding in anothe page right? So I will start on this. I don't see how anyone could have any objection. Why is the Baba stuff hidden there? It makes me a little sick as I know a Baba follower very well and they have these ideas. They're okay in my book. DeanaG (talk) 01:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have no problem in expanding the article to include information about the term as is used in different religions and movements. But it should be done in a way that does not give prominence of one specific use of the term. Specific information about each religion can be found in the article about that religion, per WP:SUMMARY ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:44, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs fleshing out 

message: I have translated this article into Spanish but I do not know how to add the language on the left bar (add "English" in the Spanish page and "Español" in the English page) Can anyone help me and tell me how to do it or where to find the instructions?, sorry Wikipedia is almost infinite--Pedrero (talk) 01:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's easy... add es:Maestro Prefecto here; and add en:Perfect Master to the es.wikipedia page. You can place these at the bottom of the page. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 02:37, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

text: No... ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 21:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translations

message: Having checked the referenced sources for several of the entries on this page it turned out that the term "perfect master" did not actually appear. The editor who added them has resigned. If they are replaced please replace with references that have page numbers, and date of translation. Thanks. LittleDoGooder (talk) 01:23, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you help us by listing the problem references?   Will Beback  talk   01:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no use of the term perfect master in the Maharbarata. Vedanta uses satguru, which translates as true teacher. Goddard uses the term Bodhisattva. Ismailis use murshid. , etc. There is equivocation here that is not justified. LittleDoGooder (talk) 02:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fake References