Talk:African-American middle class

message: While surely there was discrimination, which (I assume) kept black people down, some sources say that a black middle class developed BEFORE the 1960s. Among these sources are black economist Thomas Sowell:
"Yet the rapid growth of that [black] middle class began even before the civil-rights revolution of the 1960s, much less the racial quotas and preferences that began in the 1970s. ... The rise of blacks into professional and similar occupations was faster in the five years preceding passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 than in the five years following its passage." --Uncle Ed (talk) 15:13, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: US - controversy

message: These are great points! To address these concerns, I will edit the page to clarify that the black middle class emerged not only out of Civil Rights-oriented policies but through gradual policy-oriented change even for the years preceding the Civil Right Era. 
There is a serious lack of citations for the statistical data provided in the article. I intend to supplement current statistics with scholarly articles and journals. 
The current article on “Black Middle Class” offers a sparse examination of literature on black mobility. I will preface the article with a definition of who precisely constitutes the “black middle class,” noting certain metrics such as education, wealth, home ownership, income, and occupation. Then, I will add a section on the history of the black middle class in the United States. I will also explain how certain government policies, particularly those implemented after the Civil Rights Era, allowed more blacks to obtain middle-class status. 					
Furthermore, I will add a detailed and comprehensive section on the social characteristics of the black middle class.  My motive in this section is to illustrate how precisely black middle class experience differs from the white middle class through looking at shifts in family patterns, residential environment, and wealth. In one sub-section, I will focus on one realm of the black middle class experience—the neighborhood context—and investigate how racial segregation, shifting economic structures, and disproportionate black poverty affect the quality of life for the black middle class. I plan to use scholarly resources to explain why despite modest increases in wealth, societal and institutional factors constrain African American success.
Finally, the current section on the emergence of a black middle class South Africa will be removed. This section erroneously lumps the black middle class in South Africa with U.S.-born blacks. Furthermore, South Africa embodies a different socio-cultural, political, and economic history than that of the United States. It is beyond the scope of this Wikipedia page to discuss and compare the black middle class in the United States with that of South Africa.	
Would appreciate any feedback on these suggested changes! Thanks!
--saimatoppa  —Preceding undated comment added 17:57, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing the Page

message: Hi Saima! First off, I love how comprehensive your article is! It gives a great look at a topic that is rarely discussed. There are, however, just a few things you might want to consider, namely revolving around properly establishing the credibility of claims. 
In the section entitled “Rise of middle class blacks” you primarily discuss barriers on the basis of discrimination that have stood in the way of economic mobility. It might be good to rename the section to more accurately reflect your discussion of these hurdles. Also, in that section, be sure to look out for proper citations, especially in the second paragraph. 
It is also important to remain cognizant of the fact that highlighting potential explanations can come off as original research when the source is not cited. For example in the “Challenges of the black middle class” section the idea that this lack of upward mobility may be due to more black children being born out of wedlock should definitely be cited, not just the statistic. In the “Racial wealth gap” section be sure to be mindful of citations. The first paragraph, for example, contains direct quotes, but no footnote. It is also very important to state that the credentials of those whose opinions you are stating. For example, in the “Residential segregation” section the idea that the African American community is deprived of a unified middle-class needs to be attributed to an individual with credibility or a study. This is also essential in the “Education” section, which is currently devoid of citations. This also holds for the closing of both the “African immigrants and black middle class” section, as well as the “Poverty of African Americans” section. Lastly, in the references section, be sure to change links into more detailed citations. These are just a few small changes that can have a big impact in terms of having people better understand these explanations and get a better feel for the issue at hand. Please let me know if there's anything you need me to elaborate on. 
Good luck with everything! Avo92 (talk) 19:22, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer input

message: Given the US focus, perhaps this article should be renamed Black middle class in the United States. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 11:19, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name? 

message: The entire first paragraph of that section makes claims that are not remotely supported by the source material cited. In particular, the claim that realtors still use the presence of the archaic and illegal covenants to exclude minorities is specious. The entire paragraph includes only one citation at the end, and that citation is an article which  basically comes to the conclusion that, while some of this offensive language remains due to the difficulty of removing it from the official public records, very few of the homeowners are even aware that it exists, it is not currently being used to discriminate in any way, and organizations such as the NAACP do not consider its removal to be important due to the fact that all such language is illegal and unenforceable.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.108.49 (talk) 09:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion of modern-day housing discrimination seems misleading and not at all from a neutral point of view 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Black American Upper Class which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 18:29, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: A majority of the discrimination claims shown in the 2nd paragraph lack clear-detail and sources. Most these claims are put out as fact rather than opinion. And it seems more opinionated rather than factual. There needs to be reliable sources rather than pure opinion on a site like this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.138.189 (talk) 19:39, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: Is there anyway we can (or no objections against) remove the huge image from the center of the page and instead write that content in as text so that it meets the WP:ACCESSIBILITY guidelines? As it stands the image is difficult to read and visually impaired individuals have limited to no access to the content therein at all. I do not particularly enjoy mucking about with tables and find them rather cumbersome; if someone else would take the initiative it would be most appreciated. If not I guess I'll have to do it myself (eventually™). -- dsprc [talk] 07:34, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huge Image 

message: Is  some kind of parody? 'Ubber', 'hunderd', those colours, those vague statements in place of data? I'm not sure if this is intentionally written in some dialect for accessibility or just severely messed up.  অমিত talk 18:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: , I removed the image. Not only is the grammar poor (and suspect) but it violates accessibility guidelines for the visually impaired (also it was HUGE). If anyone wants the content, they can just create a table and copy text from it manually, preferably with correct spelling this time. Namaste -- dsprc [talk] 10:55, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncanny image? 

message: The way the article reads at present, and the citations the editor chose, it makes it look like there really is no black middle class. It's as if the editor is determined to prove that owing to the wealth gap, every black middle-class family is not really middle-class, that it's an illusion. It depends on what is being defined as "middle class". The wealth gap affects people of every race. As for "false perceptions of wealth" on black TV programming, that's an extremely subjective value judgement on the part of the author being quoted. Are there other articles that refute these claims? Also, what does "false perceptions of wealth" mean? This part of the article suggests that black people can never be middle-class or wealthy -- which simply isn't true and besides which is a dangerous message to send to young people. --Bluejay Young (talk) 21:52, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable content

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on African-American middle class. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/2003/CB03-FF01.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2014/12/15/the_black_white_wealth_gap_it_s_bigger_than_you_even_think.htmll
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090902084701/http://i2.democracynow.org/2009/8/28/from_recession_to_depression_the_destruction to http://i2.democracynow.org/2009/8/28/from_recession_to_depression_the_destruction
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have tagged this article with the following template messages:
* Needs attention from an expert on the subject. The article discusses the impact of economic and political conditions upon the African-American middle class. These are complex matters that would benefit from attention from editors that are well-versed in them.
* May be unbalanced towards certain viewpoints. For example, the article claims that "[because] of institutional housing discrimination and discriminatory lending practices, the black middle class is more likely to reside in neighborhoods composed mainly of African-Americans." There is no citation for this assertion. Furthermore, even if the second part of the sentence is factually based (as it may very well be), the cause-and-effect relationship set forth in the first part of the sentence is at least debatable. For another example, the article baldly asserts that "segregated housing patterns are supported by discriminatory mortgage lending practices and overt attempts to keep suburban neighborhoods racially exclusive." This statement may be true; however, no source is provided, and no other perspective is included on whether "discriminatory lending practices and overt attempts to keep suburban neighborhoods racially exclusive" are the sole reasons that some communities are largely African-American and some are largely white. For yet another example, the article asserts that "[the] few black professionals in all-white neighborhoods are not representative of the African-American middle class by any stretch. Rather, most African-Americans are lower middle-class living from paycheck to paycheck, employed in such jobs as retail, and facing many problems and circumstances worse off even than poor whites." Again, while this may be true, there is no cited source for this conclusory language; also, there is no balance (some might take the view that the economic position of low-income whites is not meaningfully better than that of low-income African-Americans).
* Tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. Portions of the article read more like an opinion piece than like an encyclopedia. For example, the article states that "with beliefs in 'reverse racism' prevailing, aiding programs that were enacted during the Civil Rights Movement to improve the state of the black community began being heavily opposed and overturned by the late 1970s and into the 1980s." For another example, the article asserts that "[the] history and legacy of discrimination still has ripple effects crippling the black middle class." The article also sets forth policy prescriptions, opining that "[one] policy that can potentially enable African-Americans to rise out of asset poverty is the implementation of Individual Development Account (IDA) programs that specifically target people of color and help them use matched savings to acquire assets like their first home, a post-secondary education and small businesses." 
 
* Includes inline citations, but they are not properly formatted.
* Needs additional citations for verification.
SunCrow (talk) 21:51, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed a good deal of content from the article that was either unsourced, confusing, or more editorial-ish than encyclopedic. I have removed the article tags regarding sourcing problems. The article still needs a lot of work, especially in terms of completeness and balance. SunCrow (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple issues 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:African-American gospel which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 23:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress