Talk:2006–07 Biathlon World Cup

message: Hi, I have given some thought to the table format we should use on the Biathlon World Cup (BWC) season pages. IMO, the main raison d'etre of WP's BWC pages should be to offer an easily readable overview of a BWC season complementary to the IBU's own pages, whose underlying database is filled with data. While the current format of the present article to some extent provides such a complementary overview---particularly by including a race-by-race WC score table---I think there is room for a little more information on each race, exemplified by the sample table shown below.
The alternative format which I propose, differs from the 'standard' winter sports World Cup season results table/article format; I argue that we will be better served by the alternative format, due to the following differences/advantages:
* each WC meet has its own section, which makes for a better overview and also makes for easier editing (no huge all-season tables to navigate in when modifying, correction, and adding information)
* within each WC meet section, no subsection division between Men and Women races; when you want to check the results during the race weekend (WC meet), you want a quick way into the weekend's results for both men and women, without having to navigate far down the page for the women's results, or what?
* in addition to the top three performers of each race, the rest of the top 10 is also listed (w/o flags), as this gives a much better 'feel' for the development of the season --- this extra info is added at very little expence in the use of vertical space on the page
* a comments field is included, meant for a two-liner synopsis of the race, such as special info on the top performers, or any other significant particularities of the event
=== WC 1, 29 Nov–3 Dec: Östersund, Sweden ===
==== Race results ====
Date  	Event        	Podium                                                                                                                                                                                                	Top 10
29 Nov	Women15 km IN	1. , 50:41.2 (2)                                                                                                                                                                                      	4. ; 5. ; =6. ; =6. ; 8. ; 9. ; 10. 
29 Nov	Women15 km IN	2. , +3.6 (1)                                                                                                                                                                                         	4. ; 5. ; =6. ; =6. ; 8. ; 9. ; 10. 
29 Nov	Women15 km IN	3. , +23.3 (1)                                                                                                                                                                                        	4. ; 5. ; =6. ; =6. ; 8. ; 9. ; 10. 
29 Nov	Women15 km IN	First time on the WC podium for surprise winner Malgina and runners-up Eikeland and Kocher. Malgina's best Individual result before today's victory was a 14th place in Antholz in the 2001-02 season.	First time on the WC podium for surprise winner Malgina and runners-up Eikeland and Kocher. Malgina's best Individual result before today's victory was a 14th place in Antholz in the 2001-02 season.
30 Nov	Men20 km IN  	1. , 51:38.6 (2)                                                                                                                                                                                      	4. ; 5. ; 6. ; 7. ; 8. ; 9. ; 10. 
30 Nov	Men20 km IN  	2. , +14.3 (0)                                                                                                                                                                                        	4. ; 5. ; 6. ; 7. ; 8. ; 9. ; 10. 
30 Nov	Men20 km IN  	3. , +32.7 (1)                                                                                                                                                                                        	4. ; 5. ; 6. ; 7. ; 8. ; 9. ; 10. 
30 Nov	Men20 km IN  	Bjørndalen follows up his Cross-country skiing World Cup victory at Gällivare last week with the fastest course time on each of today's five laps. Birnbacher scores his best result to date.         	Bjørndalen follows up his Cross-country skiing World Cup victory at Gällivare last week with the fastest course time on each of today's five laps. Birnbacher scores his best result to date.
···
Date	Event	Podium                       	Top 10
Date	Event	1. , Total time (Misses)     	4. Fourth, NAT; 5. Fifth, NAT; 6. Sixth, NAT; 7. Seventh, NAT; 8. Eight, NAT; 9. Ninth, NAT; 10. Tenth, NAT
Date	Event	2. , Time difference (Misses)	4. Fourth, NAT; 5. Fifth, NAT; 6. Sixth, NAT; 7. Seventh, NAT; 8. Eight, NAT; 9. Ninth, NAT; 10. Tenth, NAT
Date	Event	3. , Time difference (Misses)	4. Fourth, NAT; 5. Fifth, NAT; 6. Sixth, NAT; 7. Seventh, NAT; 8. Eight, NAT; 9. Ninth, NAT; 10. Tenth, NAT
Date	Event	Concise comments             	Concise comments
Below the WC meet's results table, I suggest we place a simple list of the top 10 ranking biathletes, with scores, at the end of the WC meet (and, during the weekend, the ranks after the most recent race, in the case someone should feel inspired to add this after each race). It is important that such a list is kept for each WC meet, so that one will be able to get a feel for the development of the season.
==== Overall WC standings at the end of WC 1 ====
Men	Men	Men	 	Women	Women	Women
1. 	   	150	 	1.   	     	104
2. 	   	114	 	2.   	     	103
3  	   	112	 	3    	     	102
4  	   	101	 	4    	     	96
5. 	   	84 	 	5.   	     	94
6. 	   	78 	 	6.   	     	81
7. 	   	77 	 	7.   	     	80
8. 	   	70 	 	8.   	     	79
9. 	   	70 	 	9.   	     	68
10.	   	69 	 	10.  	     	60
There is no problem in also having the BWC score table used at the end of the page in the current format, which gives a nice summary of the situation after each race during the season. Actually, I propose we present the data in this table graphically; I'll do this myself if no one else feels the call... :-) Minor layout details of the table format may be open for discussion, of course. Anything that makes for a clearer view of the results is most welcome! --Wernher 06:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks very good. Just one small suggestion (for every race except Östersund, really). One row to show the standings in each race format? Sam Vimes | Address me 09:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: One part of me would like to have the feature you describe here, or the overall results after each race put in the same place. However, another part of me dislikes this, on the grounds that it clutters up the table somewhat, and, IMO, may make it too long (thus succumbing to the well-known "curse of scrolling"...). As you see, I don't completely agree with myself on this one; it's a typical battle of amount-of-info vs. neatness-of-tables, as I see it. --Wernher 17:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose an easier way of doing it is by prose. "Bjørndalen still heads the Individual standings despite finishing 12th today." (To take an extremely hypothetical situation.) Sam Vimes | Address me 17:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am now working on a scheme to include last week's standing in every list (akin to music hitlists/'billboards', where last week's position of a record is indicated in parentheses besides the current position on the list. Also, up/down arrows could be used, to show whether a participant is rising or falling on the WC standings. --Wernher 23:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Looks good guys, the only thing I have in addition is that I'd like to see the full results tables like they are now at the bottom at least at the end of the competition. I think they are very useful, but a little bit annoying to update after each and every race, specially with three races per gender per weekend. SportsAddicted | discuss 10:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean the full WC standings lists, with the names, and scores, of (most/all) participants who have WC points (i.e. more than those in the Top 10)? For each discipline (IN, SP, PU, MS, RL)? Or do you refer to the matrices of WC points, which displays the development of the entire season in one table? (which we should absolutely have, at the end of the page, preferably). Please elaborate. --Wernher 17:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was indeed talking about the development in the season, with the top 30 in overall and top 15 per discipline. SportsAddicted | discuss 18:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Looks very good in the article now, only the Hochfilzen table seems to miss some lines, I have no idea what to change, so I'll leave this note here. SportsAddicted | discuss 20:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind about this, looks ok now. SportsAddicted | discuss 11:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More informative and practical results table format 

message: ==== Race results ====
Date  	Event        	Podium                                                                                                                                                                                                	Top 10
29 Nov	Women15 km IN	1. , 50:41.2 (2)                                                                                                                                                                                      	4. ; 5. ; =6. ; =6. ; 8. ; 9. ; 10. 
29 Nov	Women15 km IN	2. , +3.6 (1)                                                                                                                                                                                         	4. ; 5. ; =6. ; =6. ; 8. ; 9. ; 10. 
29 Nov	Women15 km IN	3. , +23.3 (1)                                                                                                                                                                                        	4. ; 5. ; =6. ; =6. ; 8. ; 9. ; 10. 
29 Nov	Women15 km IN	First time on the WC podium for surprise winner Malgina and runners-up Eikeland and Kocher. Malgina's best Individual result before today's victory was a 14th place in Antholz in the 2001-02 season.	First time on the WC podium for surprise winner Malgina and runners-up Eikeland and Kocher. Malgina's best Individual result before today's victory was a 14th place in Antholz in the 2001-02 season.
30 Nov	Men20 km IN  	1. , 51:38.6 (2)                                                                                                                                                                                      	4. ; 5. ; 6. ; 7. ; 8. ; 9. ; 10. 
30 Nov	Men20 km IN  	2. , +14.3 (0)                                                                                                                                                                                        	4. ; 5. ; 6. ; 7. ; 8. ; 9. ; 10. 
30 Nov	Men20 km IN  	3. , +32.7 (1)                                                                                                                                                                                        	4. ; 5. ; 6. ; 7. ; 8. ; 9. ; 10. 
30 Nov	Men20 km IN  	Bjørndalen follows up his Cross-country skiing World Cup victory at Gällivare last week with the fastest course time on each of today's five laps. Birnbacher scores his best result to date.         	Bjørndalen follows up his Cross-country skiing World Cup victory at Gällivare last week with the fastest course time on each of today's five laps. Birnbacher scores his best result to date.
···
Date	Event	Podium                       	Top 10
Date	Event	1. , Total time (Misses)     	4. Fourth, NAT; 5. Fifth, NAT; 6. Sixth, NAT; 7. Seventh, NAT; 8. Eight, NAT; 9. Ninth, NAT; 10. Tenth, NAT
Date	Event	2. , Time difference (Misses)	4. Fourth, NAT; 5. Fifth, NAT; 6. Sixth, NAT; 7. Seventh, NAT; 8. Eight, NAT; 9. Ninth, NAT; 10. Tenth, NAT
Date	Event	3. , Time difference (Misses)	4. Fourth, NAT; 5. Fifth, NAT; 6. Sixth, NAT; 7. Seventh, NAT; 8. Eight, NAT; 9. Ninth, NAT; 10. Tenth, NAT
Date	Event	Concise comments             	Concise comments
Below the WC meet's results table, I suggest we place a simple list of the top 10 ranking biathletes, with scores, at the end of the WC meet (and, during the weekend, the ranks after the most recent race, in the case someone should feel inspired to add this after each race). It is important that such a list is kept for each WC meet, so that one will be able to get a feel for the development of the season.
==== Overall WC standings at the end of WC 1 ====
Men	Men	Men	 	Women	Women	Women
1. 	   	150	 	1.   	     	104
2. 	   	114	 	2.   	     	103
3  	   	112	 	3    	     	102
4  	   	101	 	4    	     	96
5. 	   	84 	 	5.   	     	94
6. 	   	78 	 	6.   	     	81
7. 	   	77 	 	7.   	     	80
8. 	   	70 	 	8.   	     	79
9. 	   	70 	 	9.   	     	68
10.	   	69 	 	10.  	     	60
There is no problem in also having the BWC score table used at the end of the page in the current format, which gives a nice summary of the situation after each race during the season. Actually, I propose we present the data in this table graphically; I'll do this myself if no one else feels the call... :-) Minor layout details of the table format may be open for discussion, of course. Anything that makes for a clearer view of the results is most welcome! --Wernher 06:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WC 1, 29 Nov&ndash;3 Dec: Östersund, Sweden 

message: Men	Men	Men	 	Women	Women	Women
1. 	   	150	 	1.   	     	104
2. 	   	114	 	2.   	     	103
3  	   	112	 	3    	     	102
4  	   	101	 	4    	     	96
5. 	   	84 	 	5.   	     	94
6. 	   	78 	 	6.   	     	81
7. 	   	77 	 	7.   	     	80
8. 	   	70 	 	8.   	     	79
9. 	   	70 	 	9.   	     	68
10.	   	69 	 	10.  	     	60
There is no problem in also having the BWC score table used at the end of the page in the current format, which gives a nice summary of the situation after each race during the season. Actually, I propose we present the data in this table graphically; I'll do this myself if no one else feels the call... :-) Minor layout details of the table format may be open for discussion, of course. Anything that makes for a clearer view of the results is most welcome! --Wernher 06:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall WC standings at the end of WC 1 

message: :Looks very good. Just one small suggestion (for every race except Östersund, really). One row to show the standings in each race format? Sam Vimes | Address me 09:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: One part of me would like to have the feature you describe here, or the overall results after each race put in the same place. However, another part of me dislikes this, on the grounds that it clutters up the table somewhat, and, IMO, may make it too long (thus succumbing to the well-known "curse of scrolling"...). As you see, I don't completely agree with myself on this one; it's a typical battle of amount-of-info vs. neatness-of-tables, as I see it. --Wernher 17:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suppose an easier way of doing it is by prose. "Bjørndalen still heads the Individual standings despite finishing 12th today." (To take an extremely hypothetical situation.) Sam Vimes | Address me 17:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I am now working on a scheme to include last week's standing in every list (akin to music hitlists/'billboards', where last week's position of a record is indicated in parentheses besides the current position on the list. Also, up/down arrows could be used, to show whether a participant is rising or falling on the WC standings. --Wernher 23:07, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Looks good guys, the only thing I have in addition is that I'd like to see the full results tables like they are now at the bottom at least at the end of the competition. I think they are very useful, but a little bit annoying to update after each and every race, specially with three races per gender per weekend. SportsAddicted | discuss 10:24, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean the full WC standings lists, with the names, and scores, of (most/all) participants who have WC points (i.e. more than those in the Top 10)? For each discipline (IN, SP, PU, MS, RL)? Or do you refer to the matrices of WC points, which displays the development of the entire season in one table? (which we should absolutely have, at the end of the page, preferably). Please elaborate. --Wernher 17:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was indeed talking about the development in the season, with the top 30 in overall and top 15 per discipline. SportsAddicted | discuss 18:36, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Looks very good in the article now, only the Hochfilzen table seems to miss some lines, I have no idea what to change, so I'll leave this note here. SportsAddicted | discuss 20:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind about this, looks ok now. SportsAddicted | discuss 11:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Just to clarify my view on this issue: I have used the 'standard European' order which seems to be used by the IBU as well. Thus, I'm not sure whether we should reverse the order, even if the IBU might be 'linguistically wrong' --- perhaps WP and IBU (and other sports listings?) should be 'synchronised' regarding Asian name formats? That's the easy way out, of course ... --Wernher 22:56, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well. I'm aware that the European order is most commonly used, but I think that's just because the IBU don't bother to employ a computer system which can display family names first (Kong Y. instead of Y. Kong). Just like they have "Bjoerndalen" on the screen. We spell it Bjørndalen, though, because that's what it is in Norwegian. The Asian case is analogous; the correct order is family name, first name, and that's what's mostly used when talking about Chinese people (which is why Wikipedia:Naming conventions (Chinese)#Names says Personal names in Chinese, unlike Western names, present the family/clan name first. Unlike other instances where this occurs, it is standard practice in English to also present the family name first (for example, Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping).  Sam Vimes | Address me 23:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Sam, Chinese names should be with family name first, it's the wikipedia consensus and it's the standard in China itself. Check out all the subpages for the 2006 Asian Games for instance ;) SportsAddicted | discuss 11:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No problemo, guys! :-) --Wernher 16:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese name order 

message: It seems that the race writeups have been expanding line by line lately. While it is certainly nice with relatively comprehensive summaries, I originally thought we should leave that to biathlonworld.com's quite good (and paid, even) reporters from ZDF, who are doing an OK job at this already. As for WP, I had intended that we keep to a couple of lines (say, 2--3), and put in a link to said IBU/ZDF report for each race. How about that? It will also hopefully ensure that our BWC season pages won't be a hell to load and scroll through. --Wernher 04:16, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There, I have trimmed down the summaries for the Oberhof RLs, and added IBU report links for those who want more extensive race writeups. I'm not 100% sure the IBU links should be placed where I put them in this first attempt, but I couldn't think of a better place right now (06:20 CET in the morning; and, no, I didn't get UP early, so go figure ...). --Wernher 05:20, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *feels reprimanded* ;) The reason why I wrote a four-line report for the women's relay was because it was special. You don't get too many last shootings with 5 misses. It seems okay now tho. (And I think we need to link to IBU reports, if nothing else as citations.) Sam Vimes | Address me 10:35, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race summary size creep 

message: Hmm, just started wondering: might Zina Kocher's 3rd place in the 15 km IN of WC 1 in Östersund 29 Nov, be the first Canadian BWC podium appearance since Myriam Bédard's 2nd place in Hochfilzen in 1996? If so, this should certainly be noted in the summary! :) --Wernher 03:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Source! You're right, by the way. Sam Vimes | Address me 23:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When I tried accessing the source today, nothing came up on the page, so I searched around a little and found this --- but I think the Canadians haven't got their dates right, as Bédard actually placed 2nd as noted by me above (via biathlonworld.com's athlete data). Also, seems BiathlonCanada thinks a podium place in a single WC gives a medal ... Oh well. --Wernher 13:59, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kocher's podium finish 

message: Could we extend the overall results table from top 15 to top 30? 30 is the "magical number" in biathlon; as we all know the World Cup points in a given race are awarded to the top 30 finishers. Punkmorten 09:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And the top 30 in the World Cup standings get to start in the mass start. Fair enough, the data are all there in comments after all. Sam Vimes | Address me 10:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

text: A typical example of the conflicting points of conciseness and completeness... The case for the former lies in the need to avoid a very long article, while the latter goes without saying. However, the full results are available via the IBU report links. But then again, it's nice to have immediate access to the top 30 placings in the present article. Argh... --Wernher 16:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We could also leave it as it is for now and expand to top 30 at the end of the competitions. SportsAddicted | discuss 21:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

text: If we want to avoid a long article, it's the "Total WC standings at the end of WC 1", "Total WC standings at the end of WC 2" etc that need to go. Punkmorten 21:46, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After thinking a little about it, I say we keep both for the time being, no problem. It's nice to have both, to be able to a) follow the results and standings weekend by weekend, and b) get the 'grand view' by checking out the thorough statistics at the second part of the article. I'm also working on a little more detailed format of the "Total WC standings at the end of WC <n>". --Wernher 05:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Overall results

message: In connection with the previous thread, I wonder if one acceptable solution might be to split off the detailed table part into a subpage called, say, /Progression statistics? That way, we could cultivate the statistics view, with even more detailed tables than we have today; we would also I obtain faster loading of both pages, parent and subpage.
As for the tables, I for one, would very much like them to provide, in each cell, the contestant's placement in that particular race, his/her accumulated score at that point, and the accumulated WC ranking (with bib markers overall and format wise). The present tables doesn't give me a clear feel of the progression of the season with regard to each biathlete's movement up and down the WC table. --Wernher 12:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Statistics for football leagues have recently been mass deleted. So I believe that may not be the way to go. By the way see http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:WikiResults. Punkmorten 13:11, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I'll have to take a look at that discussion, in order to check if the situation for football leagues is analogous with our case. If not, we should give it a try. The raison d'être of our tables might be the uniqueness of the tables, in that no other site, not even biathlonworld.com, gives such a clear and logical overview of the season's development. --Wernher 14:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I had a look at the WikiResults talk. Based on what I read, I'd argue that we should develop our season stats subpage here on WP for the time being, and later on, if/when the WikiResults project 'gets airborne', we can move the stats over there. How about that? --Wernher 13:07, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Or, we might split the table vertically into two parts, with, say, race 1--14 at the top, and the rest below. BTW, I'm working on a spreadsheet with all the required data, with the intent of avoiding mental breakdown during the 'research' effort. :-) --Wernher 14:11, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible page split? 

message: I put in some general info in a new section, Scores and leader bibs, to enlighten the masses. While such explanations might also be places in the general Biathlon article, I thought it would be nice to place it just above the tables for the time being. Maybe we should move it later on, I don't know. --Wernher 14:51, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  General info on scores etc, added 

message: I guess we should write stubs (→articles) about redlinked biathletes who have visited the overall top ten list during the season:
* Austria's Sumann (#9 in the men's end Total, #2 in the Mass start Cup)
* Belarus's Sokolova √ Thanks, guys!
* China's Dong, Kong, and Liu
* Germany's Hitzer (#10 in the women's end Total) and Birnbacher
* Poland's Gwizdoń
* Russia's Guseva (BWCH bronze medalist), Iourieva, Malgina, Moiseeva, and Tchoudov
* Sweden's Ferry (#7 in the men's end Total)
With a little effort here, the amount of redlinks in the WC listings will be reduced to "almost nothing"! :-) --Wernher 14:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stubs about this season's breakthrough biathletes 

message: When I took a look at the article today (long time no see...), I discovered, much to my chagrin, that the Post-season brief on participants section was riddled with template errors: none of the  templates seemed to work anymore. However, they worked fine as usual in the Pre-season section, which uses them in exactly the same way! And look at this:  produces , it works here too. The erroneous behaviour of templates starts in the middle of the Final WC standings list above the Post-season section.
Then later I noticed that when I loaded the Post-season section for editing, and clicked the Show preview button, everything looked just right again. Based on this, and the Pre-season section observation, I suspect there must be a "buffer problem" here, i.e. some new buffer system implemented on WP (after I visited the article last time this spring), which restricts the use of templates in *cough* very long articles(?). Or am I barking up the wrong tree here? Anyone know more about this? --Wernher 01:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: today it all worked fine again. Could it have been a hiccup on behalf of my browser? Or, more likely, a WP database hiccup. Oh well. --Wernher 11:57, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erroneous behaviour of otherwise working templates 

message: * http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_542.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000387_601.htm
* http://www.biathlon-online.de/content/view/701/89/
* http://www.biathlon-online.de/content/view/830/89/
* http://www.biathlon-online.de/content/view/860/89/
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_550.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_551.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_552.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_553.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_554.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_555.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_556.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_557.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_558.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_580.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_560.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_561.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_582.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_586.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_587.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_588.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_590.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_591.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_592.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_593.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_594.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_595.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_597.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_596.htm
* http://sport.ard.de/sp/wintersport/news200701/10/ruhpolding_staffel_fischer_greis.jhtml
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_607.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_609.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_610.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_611.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_612.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_613.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_616.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_617.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_618.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_619.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_620.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_621.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_633.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_634.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_645.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_646.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_648.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_656.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_659.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_667.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_668.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_672.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_673.htm
* http://www.biathlon-online.de/content/view/1051/89/
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_683.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_684.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_686.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_687.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_688.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_689.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_690.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_691.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_695.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_696.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_697.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_698.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_702.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_703.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_705.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_706.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_708.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_709.htm
* http://www.biathlon-online.de/content/view/1099/58/
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000055_717.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_674.htm
* http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_700.htm
** In 2006–07 Biathlon World Cup on 2011-05-26 02:26:39, 404 Not Found
** In 2006–07 Biathlon World Cup on 2011-06-14 22:59:34, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 22:59, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2006–07 Biathlon World Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929124008/http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_648.htm to http://www.biathlonworld.com/eng/news/page_000171_648.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:10, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified