lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peripatric speciation

message: Why is it peripatric speciation, but parapatry? I understand that eri and ara might be pronounced the same in American English (as in merry and marry being homophones), so is one just a spelling mistake for the other? or are the distinct for a reason? Felix the Cassowary 08:42, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heading 

message: In reviewing the literature concerning the example of the bears (and its corresponding image and caption), I was unable to find a conclusion (by the author of the cited study) that suggested this to be an example of peripatric speciation. The article in question does discuss speciation, and is by far a great example of such; however, I believe that the person who originally added that example may have synthesized his or her own conclusion. In addition, none of the major literature on speciation cites this study as an example of peripatric speciation. 
I propose a removal of this content. I don't want to delete it without a consensus, as the information is useful and could be applied elsewhere. In addition, I noticed the image is used on several other language wikis of the same article. This is a problem as the information is incorrect.
Thoughts?Andrew. Z. Colvin • Talk 09:25, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bear example and image
Talk:Tony Hulman

message: Check the dates for the publication source for him being called "big tone" and the date the edit was made.  I know the guy who claims to of made this edit and he brags about how he got the Indy Star to call him "Big Tone" in that article.  He went by Tony and not a single article or piece of history in Terre Haute calls him that.  A vast majority of the Clabber Girl factory and restaurant is dedicated to him.  He was only referred to as Tony as a nickname.  The Indy Star got their information from this wikipedia article AFTER the edit was made claiming he was called "Big Tone"  I wouldn't be surprised if he was the one that cited the nickname .... He's kind of a turd like that. (184.60.42.123 (talk) 06:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Big Tone" was a joke that went too far 

message: A very good article; but it has the read and feel of a "slick" press release from a public-relations firm.  I have nothing available to rewrite and give a more objective viewpoint; respectfully suggest revision by persons with more information on hand. Harper 16:05, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've attempted to take out some of the obviously favorable terms used in the article and make it more neutral. If you disagree with any of the changes I made, feel free to change it yourself. Ducknish (talk) 03:50, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  peacockery 
Category talk:Internet celebrities

message: What exactly seperates this group from Internet celebrities? They both have a lot of people who could be in both, I think. DarthLuigi36 04:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A bit late, but the category has been renamed to , with  as a redirect.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 00:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Internet celebrities and personalities

message: This mark was put here because, for some reason, the category has a section for lower-case j and p, rather than putting those links in the appropriate place between the uppercase letters. Radiant! 09:16, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
* Seems to have been fixed. -- Beland 21:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup request
Talk:Malmö

message: The wiki currently says Malmö only has one mosque, but if you search for "mosque" on google maps, it seems to come up with loads. Should this line be changed on the wiki?
TheAwesomeGingerGuy (talk) 13:30, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted, , thanks. I added a couple of links to articles about mosques in Malmö, but it could do  with more of a summary, and those numbers need citing. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 14:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of mosques? 
Template talk:Sandbox

message: I think this page would be more useful as an actual sandbox vs a disambiguation page. Like Module:Sandbox, where users can create their own subpage(s) to use as (a) sandbox(es). – (t@lk) 21:53, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: User:BrandonXLF, there's Template:Template sandbox, although I've never used it myself. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 08:23, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: Replace with page like [[Module:Sandbox]] 

message: Sorry, Primefac, I saw the doc page looked odd—Usage now shows  → sandbox—saw that I was the last reviewer, and assumed it was my mistake. So, what's the intent in writing  instead of ? Cheers. — Guarapiranga ☎ 06:06, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: [[User:Primefac|Primefac]]: ''this is done intentionally'' ([[special:diff/1093371908|diff]])
Talk:GEOS

message: ----
This page's former discussion on GEOS was moved to the talk pages for the two articles spun off from the original one: Talk:GEOS (8-bit operating system) and Talk:GEOS (16-bit operating system).
----
Any ideas about this use of the name: "The Giotto mission spacecraft was derived from the GEOS research satellite built by British Aerospace..." 
Ojw 5 July 2005 11:55 (UTC)
:I realise this is incredibly late but for the record GEOS in this case refers to Geostationary Earth Orbit Satellite, two of these ESA satellites launched in the late 70's. ChiZeroOne (talk) 01:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: For some reason this has found it's way back onto the page, I'll remove. ChiZeroOne (talk) 01:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

message: Ran WikiCleaner to update bad links, missing pages, etc.  MOS says to not pipe any add'l links in the description part, just the main word.  Will work on correcting this on this page.  Thanks!
Funandtrvl (talk) 21:36, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation link repair - ([[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages maintenance|You can help!]])
Talk:Open gaming/Archive 2

message: I made several edits this morning: for the most part these are simply corrections and additions, a slight re-write of a couple of sections to smooth out the clunky prose, and the removal of a few weasel words and one section with blatant POV (which needs to be discussed before it is posted again). None of that should prove controversial, as it's primarily clarifying or expanding upon the content rather than altering its meaning.
However, I did make one change which substantially changes the meaning of the passage: in the second paragraph, I changed "A number of primarily smaller game developers have joined the open gaming initiative..." to "A number of role-playing game developers have joined the open gaming initiative...". There are two main reasons for this. First, "game developers" is vague. Thus the change to "role-playing game developers". Second, with the exception of WotC (which is owned by Hasbro), all role-playing game publishers are "small". Thus the removal of the redundant modifier "primarily small". -- BBlackmoor (talk) 09:05, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Glad to hear it, but are you going to discuss the problems related directly to the content dispute as per my request above? I can't really see a way to resolve this dispute unless we both discuss precisely why you keep deleting content from the article. Axon (talk|contribs) 18:50, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Primarily smaller game publishers" 

message: Since no one has responded to my suggestions for the general future of this article, I'll assume that no one has a problem with it (at least for the time being). Of course, that may change, but for now I'll move forward. Beginning at the beginning, here is the introductory section from the last undisputed version of the Open gaming article, and my suggested replacement (which is based on the most recent version which I helped to edit). Suggestions for corrections, deletions, additions, and so on are welcome and invited. I'll be happy to discuss any of the changes I made, and my reasons for them. Once each section has been thoroughly discussed and there is concensus on what it should say, we can copy that section to the "live" article, and move on to the next section. -- BBlackmoor (talk) 05:29, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I see you are top-posting again, BB. Please keep discussion in order of time for clarity and so that earlier responses to talk are not obscured. Obviously, I have repeatedly stated why we should not revert the version of the article mentioned aboveby BB I point people to my remarks below on this topic. Otherwise, the other version of the article you mention is obviously disputed because of the section on the OOGL. Axon (talk|contribs) 12:51, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing: ''Overview''
Talk:Transoxiana

message: I notice the article uses Bokhara, while the entry is listed under Bukhara with a redirect from Bokhara.  Should we alter the spelling? Kd5mdk 12:28, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bokhara 

message: Turanians were Iranic pple???
please dont make mad jokes in wiki
--hakozen 09:43, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turanians 

message: The islamic philosopher al Farabi was from this region. Mallerd (talk) 19:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Al Farabi 

message: Anybody who knows the pronunciation of this word in English,would you please add some IPA or phonic tips for the headword of this entry? Should the 'x' be read as 'ks' or 'gz', should the 'i' be read as 'eye' or something ? Blankego (talk) 09:54, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: "  Zhang Qian clearly identifies Parthia as an advanced urban civilization that farmed grain and grapes, made silver coins and leather goods. "  - Um, okay - what does this have to do with Transoxiana?  Or is this a editorial mistake?  I don't have the source to check. HammerFilmFan (talk) 11:25, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is this??
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/138.130.194.229

message: This page was created twelve days ago.  So far we have one person endorsing the complaint by the original two complainants, and four people endorsing the argument supporting the subject of the RfC.  Counting the editor being complained about and the person who wrote the argument in his support (me), that's six to three in favour of the anon editor.  What is supposed to happen next?  How long is this allowed to wait before it is concluded?Philip J. Rayment 01:47, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What now?
Talk:Ranger 8

message: I asked at the help desk regarding this and decided to just be bold by adding the > template. E_dog95'   Hi ' 08:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note the  footer.  Works of the federal government (including NASA) are in the public domain.  Not a copyvio.  Reverting. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 14:27, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio? 

message: The article says "...parking orbit at 185 km altitude 0 minutes after launch."  I'm taking out "0 minutes".  Bubba73 (talk), 15:06, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time to parking orbit 

message: A discussion about whether to italicize the name of this vessel, per MOS:TEXT, has been opened at Wikipedia:Village pump (miscellaneous)/Archive 48#Should this be italicized?, though it really belongs on this talk page.  — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  16:19, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italicization
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/La Shawn Barber

message: Who cares? This kind of childish crap is clear testiment to the fact that this "encyclopedia" will never be worth anything. I don't see the difference between it and a saved text file from any bunch of teenagers chatting online. What a waste. -- 148.78.249.33
----
Why is the majority of the discussion struck out?  And why am I being labelled a "very new user"?    Anyone who took a moment could see that I edited my user page last November and made my first contribution with a username last August.  I do not contribute in high volume, but I am certainly not a "very new user".  One might also notice that I attempted to clean up the article in question, and even stated that I do not know much about Ms. Barber; I am not here on a campaign for this particular article, though I find it fascinating the way it's being mishandled.  -- asciident 07:20, 27 February 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Intrinsic equation

message: there's an example image at Intrinsic_coordinates.png which is currently linked to by nothing! I tried to add it but it ended up too big and I don't know how to format it, maybe someone who knows syntax could help? Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.192.127.152 (talk) 21:42, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image? 

message: Generally, a coordinate system is a means by which an arbitrary point in the plane or space can be identified.  This isn't true of intrinsic coordinates: points outside of the curve have no (s, ψ) coordinates, and different intrinsic equations can lead to the same (s, ψ) being in completely different places relative to the s = 0 point.
This doesn't seem to make sense: "it may break down entirely when straight lines are considered".  This is no more true than it is that Cartesian coordinates may break down when you consider vertical lines.  Just as a vertical line in Cartesian coordinates is x = k, so a straight line in intrinsic coordinates is ψ = k.
Moreover, why s = f(ψ)?  ψ = f(s) is much more general. -- Smjg 15:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The name of the article should be changed to 'Intrinsic equation'. Authoritative sources such as Mathworld use this and not 'Intrinsic coordinates' which, unless there is some meaning that I'm not aware of (and I've googled the phrase to see if I could find one), makes no sense.--RDBury (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also the article essentially defines the Whewell equation, the term intrinsic is more generic than that. I'm going to try to move the article, find some references, and make the appropriate changes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RDBury (talk • contribs) 13:08, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

text: The changes were made. I tried to preserve as much of the original material as possible by merging with other articles and creating a new one. The conversion section was deleted because the it's not really possible to carry out in practice. To get an equation relating arc length and tangential angle you must find both of these quantities in terms of the parameter and then eliminate the parameter. Arc length is usually given by an integral that can't be solved in closed form and the expression for tangential angle can be complicated, so eliminating the parameter from these two equations is more or less out of the question. Try to do this with the ellipse to appreciate the difficulties involved.--RDBury (talk) 17:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a true coordinate system? 

message: And what's Cte?  French constante? —Tamfang (talk) 20:53, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: At some point Cte was changed to 1/r. —Tamfang (talk) 21:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cte
Talk:Dragan Kojadinović

message: If anyone knows the university from which Kojadinovic graduated, could they let me know, or add it to the article?  Thanks Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 15:07, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, whoever you are. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 16:39, 25 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:USS Vella Gulf (CG-72)

message: This article is really too US centric and US glorifying to be considered NPOV... while the Ticonderogas are awesome ships, they should be described  more objectively.
europrobe 15:14, 2005 Feb 20 (UTC)
Good eye.  Edited to fix this.
--Callooh 20:07, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Cleaned up the article, rearranged some paragraphs about the history of the name, also removed information found in the infobox and in the article about the AEGIS system. Don't think that the article was to biased towards the US, only extremely detailed in regards as to the ships capabilities and operational history. Bjelleklang 12:11, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaned up

message: I'm not an author, but the ship departed Norfolk, VA on 5 January 2007 on a scheduled 6 month deployment with the Bataan Expeditionary Strike Group (BATESG) and returned 3 July 2007.  It had port visits in Agadir, Morocco, Manama, Bahrain and Gaeta, Italy.  It participated in multi-national exercises including AMAN '07 (Pakistan) and supported the French Aircraft Carrier Charles De Gaul and USS John C. Stennis conducting operations in the Northern Arabian Sea in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (Afghanistan).  Small news article on homecoming of the Expeditionary Strike Group can be found at .  For reference to AMAN 2007, see .  From what I've been able to find on the internet, it would be an original work.--Asacan 13:41, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deployment 2007
Talk:Halstead

message: Title of this page needs to be updated to 'Halstead, Essex'. Facebook uses this page to show where Halstead is as a location, and as it's an ambiguous non specific name sometimes it shows Halstead in Kent (depending on device, location of device, etc.) If the page title becomes 'Halstead, Essex' this will stop happening. 2A00:23C6:6A00:D501:62BF:86B:343D:C8B9 (talk) 11:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of page needs to be updated from 'Halstead' to 'Halstead, Essex'
Talk:Lalita Sahasranama

message: It's called LALITA Sahasranama. I know, Lalitha is pretty common on the internet... Writing 'th' for 't' just seems to be a VERY popular mistake among Indians. (One other example of this: anantha, instead of ananta ('un-ending'): 66.000 hits...)
: Well, actually its a common mistake among southern Indians, not northerners. I should know, my (southern) name contains a mistaken 'th' as well (I blame my parents). Anyway, I propose a rename to Lalita. Imc 21:55, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am indeed from South India, so maybe I'm simply biased, but I seem to prefer the Lalitha spelling over Lalita, in order to emphasize that it is a soft 't' and not a hard one (i.e not the 't' in Tomato, but more like the 't' in "the"). Anyway, I suppose it is simply a matter of opinion and of little consequence if you know the proper pronunciation. Adityan 03:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title 

message: This is a wikipedia article not a book. If some editor has original full text and translations he is free to use wikisource. Thanks rams81 (talk) 15:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Deleted the 1000 names & meanings. Pls refrain from adding the 1000 names here. This is not a book. It is a wikipedia rams81 (talk) 14:23, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please don't add entire Lalitha Sahasranamam text 

message: I edited this article as much as I could with eliminating content. Corrected spelling, grammar etc. Montykillies (talk) 18:01, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy Edit Notes
Talk:INTEGRAL

message: I have enhanced the stub, as I heard that the author of Grannies and Time Machines works on the control team for this satellite.--Aodhd 15:37, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The name of this telescope, INTEGRAL, is the name of the spaceship in the 1921 scifi novel We. Is this coincidence or tribute? ~ Riobranden 18:16, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: *Probably just a coincidence, since it is an abbreviation.  They were more likely thinking of the mathematical reference when they thought of it, I would guess. --Etacar11 18:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Article says " Propulsion is by a hydrazine monopropellant system" but should that be for attitude control (eg unwinding the momentum wheels) rather than 'propulsion'? - Rod57 (talk) 18:15, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attitude control 

message: Most other spacecraft articles have them. Helpful to see their contribution. - Rod57 (talk) 15:33, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could we list some notable observations
Talk:The Leasowes

message: From the Black Country - Page 155
:
--PBS (talk) 12:41, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Original house was demolished

message: The ownership history of the house post-Shenstone was quite complicated. See:
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=_2kJAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA289&dq=Ferdinando+Dudley+Lea+william+shenstone&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwja-buAz_LhAhWFoXEKHa_cB4Y4HhDoAQhBMAU#v=onepage&q=Ferdinando%20Dudley%20Lea%20william%20shenstone&f=false Nai1maker (talk) 11:01, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Post Shenstone
Talk:USS Long Beach (CGN-9)

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for USS Long Beach.  Photos clearly show the ship is NOT at the coordinates shown.  
— — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mountshadow (talk • contribs) 04:38, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: see comment on your tp regarding this issue. Thanks - wolf 06:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the coordinates and the mentions of the ship's continued existence from the article. Deor (talk) 17:02, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: I have tried to tame the claim made in this section of the opening, as it clearly needed verification and I've tried to create a 'certain point of view' work-around. But it still might be unacceptable and weasel-worded, so revert away if necessary. Personally, I'm not all that happy with the edit.
The reason for this is that, frankly, the claim makes no real sense:
Long Beach had a hull with a LBR of over 10:1, like a destroyer, and a pronounced knuckle at the bow, unlike either a WW2 destroyer or a WW2 cruiser of the Cleveland or Baltimore classes (which also had LBRs of just less than 10:1).
All the succeeding 'destroyer leaders', 'frigates' and so on were of much larger (and very different) type to WW2 destroyers, while Long beach did not typify the WW2 cruiser hull-form, so really I don't understand what this whole "last cruiser hull in the USN" is actually all about?
Perhaps this is actually an element ripe for deletion, since it seems to be very conjectural or just based on opinion. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:F5FA:9036:757D:DC83 (talk) 18:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That specific sentence has been tagged as needing a source, and the article as whole is tagged as well. - wolf 02:08, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Last Cruiser Hull'