Talk:History of Russia (1894–1917)

message: Italic textwhat happened in 1892 that would explain that precisely this year is chosen for the division of the "Russian history" articles? As it is, it seems pretty arbitrary. dab (ᛏ) 18:35, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It says on this page that Sergey Witte pressured Nicholas into issuing the October Manifesto. However, Witte himself says in his autobiography "...I was rather opposed to the publication of a constitutional manifesto." I am far from a historian (I am a high school modern history student), and it is definately possible (although I'm unsure how probable) that Witte is lying in his autobiography, but this point needs to be clarified, if only to me. Moskvax 15:09, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Witte and the October Manifesto

message: Never mind how dumb your edit was, you deleted important page coding that keeps text from running off the side of the page. Stop being such a little punk!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.214.83.14 (talk) 03:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The King Loves to Eat Donuts? 

message: In Russian, bolshevik means from the majority and menshevik from the majority. However, I have been taught, in high school and at university, that the mensheviks were in fact the majority, but the Lenin styled himself bolshevik all the same.
I think the statement '. At the Second Party Congress of the Russian Social Democratic Labor Party in 1903, he forced the Bund to walk out and induced a split between his majority Bolshevik faction and the minority Menshevik faction' is flawed, but I would rather not make a mistake in correcting it.  Maxdf (talk) 15:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Bolshevik majority, menshevik minority?" 

message: Is this not a point of view (that should be removed). "Vladimir I. Ul'yanov (a.k.a. Vladimir Lenin) was the most politically talented of the revolutionary socialists" (in fact the whole paragraph seems full of praise of Lenin)
, Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.55.155 (talk) 13:43, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of view 

message: In response to increased Tsarist Russian activity in Sarikol (modern day Tashkurgan]] around 1900, the local Sarikoli begs and Sarikoli people feared that Russia was going to annex the region and take it away from China, fearing molestation at the hands of the Russians, they wanted to flee to Yarkand. They did not believe the official explanation that Russia was only concerned with the postal service in the area.
http://books.google.com/books?id=lTn-AQAAQBAJ&pg=PA125&dq=100+petty+Sarikol+protested+against+Russians+molest&hl=en&sa=X&ei=2BFHU4umB6rNsQTVqYDADQ&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=100%20petty%20Sarikol%20protested%20against%20Russians%20molest&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=0DgIAQAAIAAJ&q=100+petty+Sarikol+protested+against+Russians+molest&dq=100+petty+Sarikol+protested+against+Russians+molest&hl=en&sa=X&ei=2BFHU4umB6rNsQTVqYDADQ&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAQ
http://books.google.com/books?id=lTn-AQAAQBAJ&pg=PA125&dq=On+8+February+a+deputation+from+Sarikol+arrived+at+Yarkand+and+presented+to+the+Amban+three+petitions+which+bore+the+seals+of+six+headmen+and+the+thumb-marks+of+about+100+petty+Sarikol+officials.+They+protested+against+the+arrival+of+the+Russians+and+asked+to+be+given+land+near+Yarkand+as+they+were+certain+that+the+Russians+would+molest+them.&hl=en&sa=X&ei=QRJHU76nJ-qwsAT144CoBg&ved=0CCkQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=On%208%20February%20a%20deputation%20from%20Sarikol%20arrived%20at%20Yarkand%20and%20presented%20to%20the%20Amban%20three%20petitions%20which%20bore%20the%20seals%20of%20six%20headmen%20and%20the%20thumb-marks%20of%20about%20100%20petty%20Sarikol%20officials.%20They%20protested%20against%20the%20arrival%20of%20the%20Russians%20and%20asked%20to%20be%20given%20land%20near%20Yarkand%20as%20they%20were%20certain%20that%20the%20Russians%20would%20molest%20them.&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=0DgIAQAAIAAJ&q=On+8+February+a+deputation+from+Sarikol+arrived+at+Yarkand+and+presented+to+the+Amban+three+petitions+which+bore+the+seals+of+six+headmen+and+the+thumb-marks+of+about+100+petty+Sarikol+officials.+They+protested+against+the+arrival+of+the+Russians+and+asked+to+be+given+land+near+Yarkand+as+they+were+certain+that+the+Russians+would+molest+them.&dq=On+8+February+a+deputation+from+Sarikol+arrived+at+Yarkand+and+presented+to+the+Amban+three+petitions+which+bore+the+seals+of+six+headmen+and+the+thumb-marks+of+about+100+petty+Sarikol+officials.+They+protested+against+the+arrival+of+the+Russians+and+asked+to+be+given+land+near+Yarkand+as+they+were+certain+that+the+Russians+would+molest+them.&hl=en&sa=X&ei=QRJHU76nJ-qwsAT144CoBg&ved=0CDAQ6AEwAQ
Rajmaan (talk) 22:10, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Russian sentiment among Sarikoli ([[Tajiks of Xinjiang]]) in 1900 

message: An anti-Russian riot occured in Kashgar in January of 1900 when Russians consorted with Turki (Uyghur) prostitutes.
On page 124
http://books.google.com/books?id=lTn-AQAAQBAJ&pg=PA124#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=0DgIAQAAIAAJ&q=Russian+couriers+three+Cossacks+Russian+customs+native+prostitutes+Kashgar&dq=Russian+couriers+three+Cossacks+Russian+customs+native+prostitutes+Kashgar&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3BRHU5mhAYnJsQSQ9IGQCA&ved=0CDoQ6AEwAQ
http://books.google.com/books?id=Bbr5AQAAQBAJ&pg=PT126&dq=Russian+couriers+three+Cossacks+Russian+customs+native+prostitutes+Kashgar&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3BRHU5mhAYnJsQSQ9IGQCA&ved=0CDMQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=Russian%20couriers%20three%20Cossacks%20Russian%20customs%20native%20prostitutes%20Kashgar&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 22:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian incident with Uyghur prostitutes in Kashgar in January of 1900 

message: I strayed onto this page because I have made some edits about early Russian Zionists in Palestine. Their biographies all mention the impact of pogroms on their departure. Not to mention the million+ Jews who landed in New York. Just asking. Padres Hana (talk) 21:17, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pogroms 

message: The article name says "1892-1917", but the article itself shows history from 1894, two years later. Why is the name incorrect? Jack Jackie Pomi (talk) 09:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start year of this epoch