lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Gardenia jasminoides

message: Does the fruit have a stone ? Is only the flesh used (for dye and herbal medicine) ? How are the herbal medicines prepared ? What is their typical composition percentages by weight ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:46, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Composition of fruit 

message: To add to this article:  a photo of the fruit. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 21:54, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Darorcilmir (talk) 23:34, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: To add to article

message: ￼please say if its a bisexual plant or not. 2409:4073:81:4165:0:0:18F1:F0A1 (talk) 04:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi
Talk:Genovese basil

message: The pictured leaves look like a kind of sweet basil. It's a popular misconception that Genovese basil and sweet basil are the same thing. Genovese basil has flatter leaves. 103.72.190.107 (talk) 20:55, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong photo 

message: Needs a normal taxobox. DCDuring (talk) 17:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridiculously extensive taxonomy
Talk:Grindelia

message: Most of the members of this genus seem to have a cup of green clawlike, curling or erect phyllaries.  Is this true of all members?  If so, it would be nice if this article would say so.  I have a species I've been trying to identify for years and in virtually every way it looks like a Grindelia, except that the little green scales on the back of the flower head lay flat, the way they do on a dandelion like the Spotted Cat's Ear.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GlenPeterson (talk • contribs) 20:37, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Curly Cups?
Talk:Guizotia abyssinica

message: An "Ethio-Semitic" name of the plant is provided in transliteration, along with native script. Ethio-Semitic is a whole group of languages, one of which ancient and extinct. I highly doubt that the plant has the exact same name, pronunciation and spelling in each of these languages.--82.137.111.223 (talk) 21:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethio-Semitic?
Talk:Politics of Uganda

message: The article states the number 292 but according to the table, there are 319.
I guess the number varies according to the number of voters and any numberwill only true for a specific assembly term. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.178.20.81 (talk) 09:06, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many members there are in the national assembly? 

message: That is my concern… 176.241.58.154 (talk) 21:17, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I guess, sooner than later, Uganda will get some democracy…
Talk:Gubby

message: I feel that it would be appropriate to create this page in order to disambiguate the human name "Gubby".  Specifically, Gubby Allen, Martin Gubby, and Brian Gubby may all be referred to by this name.
Neelix 19:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  So now it might be a good idea if a few more people watchlist this page (and the three it links to).  --Interiot 19:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Haworthia

message: Removal of a picture that is NOT in a gallery and IS material to the article instead of moving the picture or dropping a note to the talk page if its position happens to offend you, is not only discourteous but disruptive. I realise that we have some Wikilawyers who are only in the game to see how much harm they can get away with, but good-faith editors should not support their efforts by adopting their practices. JonRichfield (talk) 19:49, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed that the position of the picture was in violation of MOS:IMAGES in that it sandwiched text. This can cause very strange layout on devices with smaller screens, which are increasingly used to access Wikipedia, so there are very good reason for the advice in the MOS. Thus there were two choices: (a) move the image right (b) remove the image. Exactly that image was already in the gallery at the bottom of the section, so I removed it rather than move it right. I don't see that my action was either discourteous or disruptive. You moved it right, which is fine (your edit summary says you reverted my edit, but actually you didn't), but you left the same image in the gallery, so I've now removed it. The end result is the same: no sandwiching, no duplicated image. So hopefully we're both happy. Peter coxhead (talk) 22:02, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Unnecessary removal of substantial material

message: Just a friendly, curious botanist stopping in to say this is a fantastic plant genus article. If I were more Wiki savvy I would try to model some of my favorite genera after Haworthia's article.  ThumYorky (talk) 05:30, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great article
Talk:Heart rot

message: In beetroot, heart rot is caused by boron deficiency (and that page calls it brown rot, which is also wrong).   Anyone up for sorting this out?  I don't have any references to hand.  Philip Trueman (talk) 12:10, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not in beetroot .. 
Talk:Hedychium coccineum

message: Tom Wood's dwarf variety of Hedychium coccineum has been sold under the name 'Orange Brush' not 'Orange Bush' as stated in the article.  It has also been sold under the name 'Disney'  since the plant was originally obtained Dave Case from Diney World but since I didn't want to get into trademark problems with Disney I gave it the name Orange Brush due to it having six vertical rows of stamens projecting from the spike.  See my wesite www.gingersgalore.com.
Also the image of H. coccineum shown is incorrect.  This is an image of a mislabelled reprint of an unpublished painting from the collection of Roscoe's effects at 500 copies of which were sold by the  Liverpool Botanic Garden to raise funds for the restoration of their conservatory.  See www.palmhouse.org.uk.  The plant illustrated is probably H. urophyllum.
Tom Wood —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.251.151.39 (talk • contribs) 10:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Eupatorium cannabinum

message: Hi Wikipedians, 
Unsure on the procedure to correct a dead link, so I am posting it here.
the link to the paper by Fu etal on Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids on Chinese Herbal Medicine is here
https://www.fda.gov.tw/tc/includes/GetFile.ashx?mID=148&id=8389
This paper also lists another plant, Eupatorium fortunei, also used in TCM that has an page in Wikipedia which also point to the same dead link.
Eupatorium_fortunei
Possibly there are many more Wiki pages pointing to the same dead link!
Is there a way to automate the search and replacement of this dead link?
Thanks for the Wiki content! keep up the great work!
Rarscal (talk) 00:48, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Hexastylis arifolia

message: Not sure if I found the right page but the taxobox looks great. Short article, not 1200 words (that's why not sure If I found complete article). Great lead! Pictures are hard to tell what the plant is, if possible can find a better pic? Mosenga17 (talk) 19:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hanover, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 05:59, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article
Talk:Clifton, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 06:09, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Shahganj

message: here there is collage :Public inter collage Shahganj Jaunpur: whose Principal is Mr. Shyam Mohan verma. Mr. Verma is very honest,royal,social and very acedemic person in shahganj.He always think about collage and other academic activity, This collage have situated in 1948 and have got many award in academic field and other area. number of student of this collage are sit on many higher post.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.177.153.111 (talk) 09:44, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Pterocarpus marsupium

message: An online store selling wood chips and claiming they are a cure for "Diabetes (also known as sugar), "obesity( slimming )" as well as "reducing joints pain" - is NOT a reliable source.
That claim and citation should both be removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.146.153.215 (talk) 16:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious diabetes claims
Talk:Ipomoea mauritiana

message: Can anyone submit a photo of the Likam, or giant potato? Is this species toxic?207.69.139.154 22:46, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cymbalaria muralis

message: Should this page be merged with the page on Cymbalaria, which has more content, included better images of Ivy leaved toadflax?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.71.9.206 (talk) 23:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Why does my password and date appear at the top of this article? Please someone correct this.--Osborne 19:30, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted your addition of that information to the article - it appears that you added it there yourself. First Light (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Stray text

message: plants.usda.gov says this genus is in the Scrophulariaceae  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.223.176.88 (talk) 17:43, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong family? 

message: Following the citation for USDA plant profiles, you can search on the invasive and noxious list. This species is introduced in the US, yes, but it is not invasive. Possibly check other locations mentioned to clarify if it is really invasive in all of them too. 64.33.76.18 (talk) 05:53, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not invasive in US
Talk:Vining, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 06:11, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:King Clone

message: 11.700 Years counted back from which Year? I already know this story about maybe 10 Years and in this times I also had read "11.700 Years" but now it is about 10 Years later and so it should be 11.710 Years - or? It would be great including the "Basic-Year" into the Article. Please forgive me my bad english -- Hartmann Schedel  Prost  09:38, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The age of this is not exact. From the article, it "is estimated to be 11,700 years old".  When you're talking about 11,700 years, one can't simply pinpoint a specific age. The creosote bush overview mentions that it is carbon dated. I'm sure you can read up on carbon dating and get an idea of the acceptable ranges.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.166.15.114 (talk) 01:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: oh sure I know enough about the C14 to know, it is not working exactly (even if I don't know much about it) - by the way: do someone know if the 11.700 years are calibrated or just C14-Years? However in 100 Years it must be estimated 11.800 Years old (for example). Ok lets get the Question the other way around: do someone know when the C14-Measuring was made? And still I would be glad to know, when Jim Cornett made his flight -- Hartmann Schedel  Prost  15:31, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

text: this could maybe be helpful for listing in external websites -- Hartmann Schedel  Prost  15:40, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Normally, for this kind of measurement, I read "approximately 11,700 years before radiocarbon present" for "11,700 years old." Radiocarbon present is set by convention at A.D. 1950. I'm not sure that is what is meant in this case, but I would guess it is. It could definitely be cleared up by someone familiar with Dr. Vasek's research. TCSaint (talk) 17:36, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  11.700 Years old 

message: The article on the Pando_(tree) claims the tree is "oldest known living organisms" in apparent contradiction to this article Ucanlookitup (talk) 03:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pando
Talk:Parkerian Hexad

message: == Possession or Control ==
The given example (a stolen sealed envelope) is far from ideal as it introduces a subjective element into the argument (the concerns of the envelope owner)which is not intrinsic to the information asset. A much better (and real world) example that seems nearer to Parker's intent would be TLS certificates, which are capable of revocation.
212.159.59.5 (talk) 10:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: >o  ASCII ribbon campaign against HTML e-mail o<

message: The given example (a stolen sealed envelope) is far from ideal as it introduces a subjective element into the argument (the concerns of the envelope owner)which is not intrinsic to the information asset. A much better (and real world) example that seems nearer to Parker's intent would be TLS certificates, which are capable of revocation.
212.159.59.5 (talk) 10:45, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possession or Control 

message: I marked this article with the Notability template, because I believe it does not meet the WP:SIGCOV guideline. There has been very little attention for this theory.
Most of the references on this page are either works by the person who coined the theory, or works that don't mention the hexad at all. The (withdrawn!) NIST SP 800-33 mentions two properties other than the usual CIA triad, but they are not related to Parker's model.
As far as I can see, the linked Master's thesis cites one secondary source that mentions the Parkerian Hexad: a blog post from 2009.
Information security links here, but that paragraph mentions: "The merits of the Parkerian Hexad are a subject of debate amongst security professionals." The citation for it points to a blog that links to this article, and the "debate" is basically one security professional dismissing it.
I think two blog posts as secondary sources don't count as receiving significant coverage in reliable sources.
--Stiiin (talk) 17:00, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Notability template
Talk:Komatsuna

message: I am not a botanist, but I live in Japan and I often eat both Komatsuna and spinach. I am absolutely sure the photograph used on this page is of regular spinach. A quick Google search should verify that I am correct. I think it might be better to have no picture than a picture of the wrong plant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2400:7800:415F:7600:8419:E051:6242:6EED (talk) 07:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph in need of change.  
Talk:Latakia (tobacco)

message: How does one pronounce the word "latakia"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.237.252.172 (talk) 06:05, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: Here is a list of things that I believe still need to be added to the page. 
Pictures - we need pictures of Latakia leaf, fields, the barns they are cured in, and the way they are sun cured. though we already have a picture of some Orientals from Macedonia, these are Var. Rustica and we need the latakia Tobacum Var. Fruiticosa. (a larger looking leaf). if we could get a side by side with other Orientals to show size difference, that would nice. 
there a lot of citations needed and some supporting pages that are missing (Virginia Tobacco, drew estate cigars). 
-we need more info in the Use within tobacco blends area. I've added information on English Blends and touched on aromatics and cigars/cigarettes, but we need to expand on Balkan blends. though they may just contain latakia like English blends do, they are used differently and paired mostly with other Orientals with smaller additions of western tobaccos. 
we need to touch on dedication of pipes as latakia is a strong flavor and very distinct. to a point that it can leave a lasting flavor in most pipes. so, many pipe smokers use separate pipes for these blends. though not all smokers do. 
we need more history about the fluctuation of availability and price when concerning the stability of Syria. moreover, we need more info tying this to the transfer of production to Cyprus. 
furthermore, we need more history on the use of latakia and its availability during pre independence (pre1920)
we need more examples of blends throughout history. it would be nice to see blends from the 19th century, 20th century (pre-resurgence), and the 21st century that exemplifies their most distinctive contributions to that era of pipe smoking. 
we need to make sure that we setting this tobacco aprt from other smoke-cured leaves. it would be cool to see a paragraph talking about this and why latakia is different from say kuntucky firecured.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrislWatford (talk • contribs) 19:43, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  fleshing out this page. 

message: Make some copyedits, although further editing is needed to structure the article so that it is clearer. I removed the perfume section since it was barely relevant. --LatakiaHill (talk) 04:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing perfume section 

message: 209.48.131.18 (talk) 16:14, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  list of Citation to be used in the future.
Template talk:Agra-geo-stub

message: The redirect Template:Cities, towns & Villages in Agra District has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  1234qwer1234qwer4 15:49, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Template:Cities, towns & Villages in Agra District]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Republican River

message: Just a note that there's a US$70 million lawsuit pending over the river compact:
http://journalstar.com/articles/2009/06/22/news/nebraska/doc4a40021b77e52461258266.txt  --Preceding unsigned comment added by Wainstead (talk • contribs) 03:21, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kansas versus Nebraska 

message: Looking over GNIS data, it's clear the Republican River is formed by the confluence of the North Fork Republican River and the Arikaree River.  Not the North and South Forks.  The text has been updated to reflect this.  --Footwarrior (talk) 01:39, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Fork and Arickaree 

message: I've excised a newly-inserted section titled "Controversy", concerning the Kansas-Nebraska dispute over Republican water.  The subject definitely needs to be addressed in this article.  However, the section that I reverted was a clear copyright violation: three fairly lengthy sentences taken verbatim from this AP article, copyrighted 2011.  The order of the sentences has been changed, and a short transition phrase added, but I think that it's nevertheless a clear case of WP:COPYVIO.  Ammodramus (talk) 16:00, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio re. KS-NE controversy
Talk:Grey junglefowl

message: Shouldn't the photo be at the top in the info box rather than the painting? 124.185.246.230 (talk) 09:52, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: I removed the "Endagered species" section. The first paragraph, and the citation for it, had nothing to say about the species risk assessment. The second short claim cited a reference to a 1976 fishing newsletter which is, not only 40 years old, but neither academic nor journalistic, and certainly not something that can be cited for such a claim as species risk. Finally, the page states that the ICC categorizes the species as LC, so... unless that is completely wrong, the section has no place on the page.
75.53.80.49 (talk) 09:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The IUC redlist has them as "least concern". Jim1138 (talk) 09:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endagered species section removal
Talk:Leptosporangiate fern

message: :Leptosporangiate fern → Pteridopsida — Consistency in page naming; anyway, the Osmunda clade is arguable whether it's leptosporangiate or eusporangiate.  I think it's better to use the scientific name and to redirect from the English name.— jaknouse (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose. The usage of "leptosporangiate fern" (to include Osmundaceae) reflects the usage of papers such as Smith 2006 and Schuettpelz 2007. Then there's the Pteridopsida versus Polypodiopsida question. Furthermore, we just discussed this a few weeks ago at Talk:Pteridopsida. Kingdon (talk) 02:58, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

text: Comment. The equivalent articles at WikiSpecies and Commons are atcommons:category:Polypodiopsida and WikiSpecies:Pteridopsida, which is confusing.--Grahame (talk) 06:57, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed move 

message: Can anyone put a better image at the infobox? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Extra999 (talk • contribs) 
:Go for it! Should be plenty of choices at commons:Category:Polypodiopsida. Kingdon (talk) 11:27, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: The first sentence of the first paragraph is:
"Leptosporangiate ferns are the largest group of living ferns, including some 11000 species worldwide."
The first sentence of the second paragraph is:
"There are approximately 8465 species of living leptosporangiate ferns, compared with about 2070 for all other ferns..."
11,000 or 8465, which is it?
Mmmeiss (talk) 18:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I came here to write a similar question. The article Fern speaks of “10,560” altogether, which would leave a negative number for the subclasses not covered here. Now, the sentence here has three citations, so it seems very credible. Can anyone look up one of the sources, please? ◀ Sebastian 13:16, 4 June 2020 (UTC)

text: Adding up the numbers from the other articles doesn't help: Equisetidae: 20 + Ophioglossidae: 129 + Marattiidae (i.e. Marattiaceae): 110 ≪ 2000. ◀ Sebastian 14:42, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction in species numbers cited
Talk:Liatris aspera

message: The page for Liatris aspera includes a photograph with a Monarch butterfly perched on a Liatris ligulistylis specimen. Please correct this immediately  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:85B0:2F80:F4B7:F113:ADEE:BE78 (talk) 03:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)