Talk:Neurosis (band)

message: Mastodon should be listed as an assosciated act, since Scott Kelly sang on Crack the Skye, and Mastodon have named Neurosis as one of their main influences. 86.46.139.94 (talk) 20:41, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mastodon

message: Anyone else think that these two articles should be merged into one:  Neurosis & Jarboe and Neurosis & Jarboe ?  Obv. I'd be in favour to keep them seperate if there was going to be more releases from this collobaration. Lugnuts 19:34, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Neurosis & Jarboe

message: :Image:Neurosis-GivenToTheRising.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Neurosis-GivenToTheRising.jpg

message: :Image:Neurosis Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Neurosis Logo.png

message: The use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. — Moe ε 15:25, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use criteria

message: This article contains absolutely no references whatsoever, even for statements that are supposedly made by a critic (and therefore should be easily researchable). The list of bands that Neurosis supposedly influenced should have a citation for each such band where that band says exactly that--and the other list needs a citation for each entry where a member of Neurosis states that they themselves were influenced by that band. Otherwise, it's meaningless opinion and should be deleted. Without citations and references, this article isn't even remotely encyclopedic and comes across as something you might read on the band's personal website. Note that I'm not arguing that they aren't notable--I don't know either way--merely that nothing in the article that is written here PROVES that they are notable. Ig8887 (talk) 15:40, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Can we get some references, please?

message: Does anyone know for sure that this album was released in 1990? Some other sites say it was released in 1991, and their official site says it was 1989.Dcdm (talk) 20:06, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Word as Law 

message: Black EP was a self-released Neurosis record in 1986. The tracks are:
1. - Progress (2.46)
2. - Faith of Fraud (2.35)
3. - Black (5.56)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.91.140.156 (talk) 21:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black EP 

message: I have started a casual discussion about page moves and primary topics concerning Times of Grace and related articles at Talk:Times of Grace (band)#Primary topic. Input is welcome. Rehevkor ✉ 19:44, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page moves/Times of Grace 

message: I would like to expand on the history of the band and create different sub-sections for each era. I will place my drafts in here before adding them to the main article. F6119474 (talk) 11:45, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More history of the band 

message: I wonder if these side projects pass notability under the WP:MUSIC criteria and need to be merged into the page. Same for the individual members. Karst (talk) 12:53, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Side projects

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Neurosis (band). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130403224727/http://heavymetal.about.com/od/neurosis/gr/Neurosis-Souls-At-Zero-Review.htm to http://heavymetal.about.com/od/neurosis/gr/Neurosis-Souls-At-Zero-Review.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Regarding the infobox, shouldn't we replace doom metal and industrial by sludge metal and avant-garde metal? It's a better definition of the style of the band in my opinion, and finally, very few albums of theirs have been described as (straightforward, I suppose) doom metal and industrial. (Unsigned by IP)
:Calling potentially interested editors : & . Your thoughts? Robvanvee 15:02, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree it's more accurate, and searching "Neurosis" "sludge metal" reviews 20,000 more results than "Neurosis" "--MASHAUNIX 09:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Way back I had reworked the musical style section and chose the current 4 genres from among many that were in the infobox before that. My idea was to "aim for generality" as per Template:Infobox_musical_artist#genre, and so include only the broadest genres in which the band's rich style is rooted. Since sludge is defined as the fusion of doom & hardcore with elements of industrial, and all of these have also been applied to the band and their albums directly, I left it out of the infobox with a special mention in the lead. But perhaps this could be done the other way around (having sludge in the infobox and mentioning doom/hardcore/etc in the lead) if you'd prefer.--MASHAUNIX 09:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Few days have passed, and no one seemed to be against that change, so it has been made.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.40.79.214 (talk) 10:58, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre change in the infobox