lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bottom–up and top–down design

message: I have added a very brief description about top-down and bottom-up processing in the world of Psychology, and I have also referenced the information that I used.Please let me know if there are some inaccuracies that need to be fixed in the information I have added.Joysabal (talk) 03:55, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The information about neurology is outdated. Researchers now think that all levels of cortical processing are subject to top-down processing. Note the discussion of recurrent feedback processing and the influence of higher-tier cortical areas on the V1 page.ParticipantObserver (talk) 19:26, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top-down and Bottom-up Approaches in Psychology 

message: Hello! My name is Nicole Bednarik.
I felt that the Ecology section of this article did not elaborate enough on either of the processes. I have added more details going off of what the original text said, including a citation from where I got this information from. I also fixed some grammar issues that took away from the quality of the section.
If any of my information is incorrect, could be added to further, or if I am missing any citations, please let me know or change it.
Bednariknicole (talk) 16:23, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to Ecology Section-adding information, fixing grammar 

message: This may prove useful ... https://stevegluck.com/pyramidal-modeling.html ...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sequitorian (talk • contribs) 16:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pyramidal Modeling 

message: Fixed some blatant speling errors (sic) in the paragraph "Schooling" - then noticed it appears to be of poor quality. Someone with subject knowledge may want to review its contents. Vintagesound (talk) 17:59, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schooling 

message: Yes. Pdf 39.34.146.89 (talk) 11:24, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top. Bottom. And.  More. Role.  In. PDF 

message: — Assignment last updated by Edwin2233 (talk) 18:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Human Cognition SP23
Talk:Market dominance

message: I don't know anything about the copyright status of the earlier article, but I have writen an article with very little included from the original article. Here it is.  mydogategodshat 09:10, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)

message: I suggest to link some examples of market dominancy, like for instance
* Adobe Flash	 
* Microsoft Windows
--Kozuch (talk) 20:13, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples
Talk:Conference

message: Anyone agree? --Howard the Duck 14:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ripping of sports-related content into [[Conference (sports)]]? 

message: Would linking to Convention violate any rules regarding 1-way "see also" links or any other rules? I searched Conference's revision history and found too many edits referring to "convention" though none of the first 3 "hits" had "convention" in their past versions. I wanted to ask before making any such edits. richardc020 (talk) 04:18, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Convention
Talk:Frank Herbert

message: Has there been any discussion about adding information concerning Herbert’s poor relationship with his gay son, Bruce, his personal views on homosexuality, and how it may have influenced his depiction of Baron Harkonnen (potentially - I think this last bit may be better suited for only the Dune page, or at most as a brief parenthetical here)? I ask because I don’t want to make changes if there’s been previous discussion I should be aware of, and I’d love to hear thoughts on how and where it’d be best to add this information. Thanks! Dbusb (talk) 04:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, please see my comments at Talk:Dune_(novel)#Baron_Harkonnen’s_Homosexuality. You'll need reliable sources that specifically make that connection. I'd be happy to help you develop any content on this subject for inclusion here or in Dune-related articles like Vladimir Harkonnen.— TAnthonyTalk 19:16, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship with Bruce & Views on Homosexuality 

message: Is this actually true? It sounds like he was interested in Buddhism but not a convert. I'm removing the categories, if I'm wrong please tell me. Prezbo (talk) 16:15, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convert to Buddhism? 

message: Could we get a better photo of Herbert? By "better" I mean one that captures his whole face and is less grainy. https://www.historylink.org/File/21248 J E F-T (talk) 18:40, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article photo 

message: Tone and content here reads like a personal essay on the topic rather than summary of known analysis. At the minimum, this section needs more, and more diverse citation. 2600:8801:1401:3000:7D91:766C:5E2D:B8B3 (talk) 17:58, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV in Ideas and Themes section
Talk:Lawn mower

message: John Burr, a black man born into slavery, patented an improvement to the rotary lawn mower and his designs are used by motors to today. My issue is why is there only one sentence sentence relating to John Burr? 2601:804:8403:C6E0:B97F:7549:5F33:900A (talk) 16:53, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No single person invented the lawn mowers we use today. Instead, the design was improved over time by many people of which Burr was one. I am not a lawn mower historian, but it looks to me as if the mention is due weight considering his contribution. Sjö (talk) 17:04, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Burr
Talk:Flower

message: There are many different types of vegetables name,
but some common ones include:
Cauliflower
Broccoli
Cabbage
Brinjal
Apple Gourd
round bottle gourd
Pumpkin
Colocassia Root
Lotus root
Lady Finger
This is just a small selection
of the many types of vegetables that are
available. Each type of vegetable has its own
unique taste and nutritional benefits, and
they can be prepared in a variety of different
ways. Some popular ways to prepare vegetables include roasting, sautéing, grilling, and steaming.
It’s also worth noting that many vegetables are also used in traditional dishes from around the world, for example eggplant in ratatouille, sweet potatoes in sweet potato pie, okra Harendradatta (talk) 06:51, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Harendradatta 181.41.81.97 (talk) 02:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  50 + vegetables name  

message: The article's main image contains 4 images of non-flowers: reproductive structures of Picea abies, Pinus pinaster, Equisetum arvense, and Cycas revoluta, none of which are flowering plants. 171.66.12.183 (talk) 22:18, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Well spotted - that's been fixed now.  Junglenut |Talk  23:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-angiosperms in main image 

message: "I Bet Your Mother Would Be Proud Of You"- Frank Ocean.... WhoBeKnockingOnTheirDoor (talk) 17:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Your request doesn't seem to be relevant, provided the page. If I am misunderstanding, feel free to reply with a more specific proposition. Urropean (talk) 18:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 January 2024
Talk:Multiplex

message: --203.88.142.121 (talk) 04:50, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

message: If one of the highways could have ended at the other, that is a "stupid multiplex".
: Is "stupid multiplex" the technical term for this?  I thought something like  might be a "stupid multiplex".  If you can't read the picture, it shows Highway 401 multiplexed with itself. --Timc 02:26, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Although this sign is now gone, a better picture:  --Timc 18:49, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: A search for "stupid multiplex" on a search engine gives no relevant hits other than mirrors of this wiki --66.102.74.57 20:36, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highway multiplexing
Talk:Military technology and equipment

message: I made a fairly major edit to this article as it was all over the place and fairly unclear. Please discuss grievances and complaints here before going about with a revert war. Thanks. Midster 17:48, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)
:It seems to me that the section "Military tactics, Military strategy and Military doctrine" at the end of this article has little to do with "Military technology and equipment" --Philip Baird Shearer 11:09, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major edit. 

message: It seems to me this is a bit of a confusing article. 
Military technology is that which is distinctly not civilian in application.
Militaries make use of a lot of equipment, from toilet paper to commercial jets, which is not uniquely military, so the 'equipment' part really belongs in its own articles that deal with specific application/use of this equipment.
Military technologies that were distinctly military in application were (off the top of my head):
Combat armouring
Sail and masting
Gunnery
Rocket science
Automatic fire
Turreted naval guns
Indirect fire ranging
Submarines
Mining (land and naval)
Aircraft bombing (as opposed to thrown bombs)
Vehicle armouring (tanks and APCs)
Missile guidance
Logistic standardisation 
GPS guidance
In other words any technology that has no commercial application or that would be considered inefficient, never mind dangerous, in civilian application.--Mrg3105 03:47, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military technology 

message: I would propose that this article is a list that is not really clear on what it is about. In fact it contains seven lists
* List of combat skills
* List of military concepts
* List of military methods
* List of military sciences
* List of military technologies
* List of military weapon system types
* List of military equipment types
The list area is a bit confusing at the moment, to me anyway--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 09:00, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  split, into seven 

message: Gentlemen, in our effort to play by the rules and to respect the ongoing work of all the contributors to this section we are formally requesting inclusion to this section "Military Technology & Equipment" under the "See Also" section. We are a non-commercial Press Release organization that works on behalf of most of the leading weapons and equipment manufacturers INCONUS. Essentially when there is new weapons, equipment or gear being released within the industry (MILSPEC and Other) we are contacted to release the information to the general public. It is our desire to be listed as:
Tactical Gear News: The latest tactical gear news covering weapons,training, clothing and tactical equipment.
The site is located at: www.TacticalGearNews.com
Milspecnews (talk)milspecnews  —Preceding undated comment added 11:34, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there is no existing article on your organization in Wikipedia, it would be incorrect to list you under See also. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT PRAISE GOOD WORKS 12:22, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition To Military technology and equipment Request
Talk:Bad science

message: It seems like this page could include some of its material in scientific method and then just redirect to it.  Tempshill 16:26, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: October 2003

message: If this is going to be about the newspaper column it should be at Bad Science which currently goes straight to Ben Goldacre. Personally I think it should just redirect there too.--A Geek Tragedy 23:41, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Even though I just edited this page, I agree.  I will put in redirect unless get cries to contrary. --Deditos 17:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think I disagree with this. There is more than one type of "bad science." We need an article that serves as a link amongst the various "bad science" concepts. Bad science is a major concerns and is a complex issue that should not clutter the main scientific method article. Bad science is broader than any of pseudoscience, junk science, and cargo cult science. We will also need to consider bad science of at least three different types in peer-reviewed journals: scientific fraud, mediocore science, and inept science. I do agree that a separate article on the "Bad Science" newspaper column is warranted, but it is only one of several journalistic efforts with a focul on bac science.  Arch dude 03:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps a consensus can be arrived at before attempting an integrating article here. There is the category :Category:Junk Science which exists already. Might this work? --Ancheta Wis 04:27, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

text: One of the difficulties of this article is the distinction between normative, ie how something should be, and positive science, ie, how something is. These are basically different spheres which might bear more thought.--Ancheta Wis 04:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Newspaper column

message: *Support -- This term appears to be synonymous with "junk science." Mrwuggs 16:52, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merger
Talk:Signal trace

message: This seems like more of a dictionary defintion than an encyclopedia article. I think it should go on Wiktionary instead? (See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Axlrosen 19:02, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that this article just needs more work. What about Trace widths? copper amount (1 oz, 2 oz, etc.)? I think this article has potential to be a real encyclopedia article. --Matejhowell 18:28, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I have undone the redirect of this article.  A quick look at IEEXplore gets numerous hits for "signal trace".  There are certainly many more under other search terms.  Many of these papers are explicitly on the subject of signal traces.  It is clear that there is great scope for expansion of this article.  Just in the first page of results I can see sources that would enable sections to be written on noise coupling, termination and radiation, multi-modes, dielectric and conductor losses, and multilayer issues.  That is just the directly relevant issues; we could also discuss vias and fencing in relation to traces, all just from that first page of results. We should certainly keep it while there is nothing in the pcb article on the subject. SpinningSpark 13:44, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dictionary vs Encyclopedia 

message: It seems that US use favours (sic!) "trace" while UK use prefers "track" (conductive track vs. conductive trace). Chip manufacturers seem to talk about "wiring". Can anyone out there shed some light on regional differences? (NB I am primarily interested in the terminology for computer chips rather than traditional PCBs) 2003:E4:2F1E:7200:74EB:90C3:C313:8661 (talk) 10:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  US vs. UK use
Talk:Ground plane

message: This seems like more of a dictionary defintion than an encyclopedia article. I think it should go on Wiktionary instead? (See Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Axlrosen 19:02, 18 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Dictionary

message: What about the significance of a ground plane for RECEIVING antennas?Jackborn (talk) 21:16, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Due to electromagnetic reciprocity an antenna has the same radiation pattern when receiving as transmitting, so ground planes are equally important in increasing the gain of receiving antennas as in transmitting antennas.  In general, a properly placed ground plane doubles the power received by an antenna element, since it receives both the direct radio waves and waves reflected by the plane, so it increases the gain of the antenna by 3 dB.  A half-wave dipole has a gain of 2.15 dBi, while a quarter wave monopole, made by replacing one side of the dipole by a perfect ground plane, has a gain of  2.15 + 3 = 5.15 dBi.   As you say, the cost of this is that the antenna only receives radio waves from one side.   A great many receiving antennas use ground planes: the T antenna used in shortwave listening, the phased array antenna used in military radar, the ground plane whip antenna used for CB radios, the reflective array antenna used for TV antennas, which consists of dipole elements in front of a ground plane (see picture).  The article should probably be edited to make this clear. --ChetvornoTALK 03:07, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Receiving antenna
Talk:Stage name

message: The actor Mark Harmon is cited as an example of a performer who used his middle name as a stage name to avoid confusion with other family members (in his case, his father, the sportscaster Tom Harmon.)  But, Thomas Mark Harmon was known as Mark even before his acting career. He was somewhat famous as the starting quarterback for Top-20 UCLA football teams in 1972-1973. even though he never played professionally. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 17:59, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark Harmon
Talk:Objective-C

message: Please add the logo for Objective-C to the infobox. Mast303 (talk) 01:35, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Objective-C logo
Talk:London E17

message: See Talk:London E17/Delete for an archived discussion over whether this article should have been deleted.
----
::I have read the above discussion and it seems that there is a 50:50 view on the necessity for such articles as this! One thing that does come out of it all, though, is that once the postal code area is delineated; and since it doesn't often coincide with the places - such as those shown on this article, for example; there isn't really much more can be said. In which case I cannot for the life of me understand why all these postcode articles are then called stubs. That simply adds hundreds more articles to the stubs lists with no apparent justification. As someone in the archived discussion above said - we are in danger of becoming a laughing-stock! Peter Shearan 11:02, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Gordon Cooper

message: There are no citations for the supposed quotes. And what's with the strange typography and quotation-mark pictures? Unless this is cleaned up, the whole section should be deleted.
: and list of events or milestones without context are meaningless  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.56.224.34 (talk) 08:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  quotes 

message: An Astronaut's UFO Experience - Gordon Cooper - YouTube.
He also discusses the film of the UFO landing. He discussed looking at the negatives. 
Wikipedia does allow primary sources to be used too. 
I don't have time to incorporate this into the article and references. So others with more time might do so. It is at least a backup to the secondary sources. -- Timeshifter (talk) 16:40, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youtube of Gordon Cooper discussing the UFOs he saw
Talk:Kanji

message: This sentence " This contrasts with on'yomi, which are monosyllabic, and is unusual (my emphasis) in the Chinese family of scripts, which generally use one character per syllable – not only in Chinese, but also in Korean, Vietnamese, and Zhuang; polysyllabic Chinese characters are rare and considered non-standard." seems to me to contradict itself. Shouldn't it rather say the equivalent of "On'yomi is monosyllabic which is the most usual in the Chinese family of scripts... " ?
Bj norge (talk) 10:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no error. A beginner in the language will rarely come across characters with long readings, but readings of three or even four syllables are not uncommon. This (the fact that polysyllabic kun readings are common) contrasts with on'yomi, which are monosyllabic, and ("this" i.e. the frequency of polysyllabic kun readings) is unusual in the Chinese family of scripts, which generally use one character per syllable—not only in Chinese, but also in Korean, Vietnamese, and Zhuang; (in all these languages) polysyllabic Chinese characters are rare and considered non-standard. — Tonymec (talk) 23:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarify meaning - monosyllabic is the most common? 

message: afterall it is just shoving religion down our thoats on a article about a non religious subject shouldn't it be CE not AD for this porpuse Dankpods (talk) 00:21, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  should AD be replaced with CE 

message: A lot of this article is a mess. In particular:
* Multiple sections completely lack inline citations
* The readings section is overly verbose - in particular the subsection 'When to use which reading', which also cites no sources, presents a massive block of text could certainly be made a little more concise
I would like to clean this up but can't find the time and also probably lack the expertise to do so. Any volunteers? — Jthistle38 (talk) 23:55, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaning up the mess 

message: There’s nothing wrong with this, but what’s the font the Japanese Wikipedia usually uses when addressing an article? 火佐木 (talk) 22:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about Japanese text
Talk:Washington Irving

message: The adventures of Captain Bonneville, U.S.A. in the Rocky Mountains and the Far West , digested from his journal and illustrated from various other sources George P. Putnam, New York (1849) catalogued here at Hathitrust. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:51, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you clarify what you're asking? How is it missing? It's referenced both in the main article text as well as in the bibliography. --Midnightdreary (talk) 20:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing work?
Talk:IMHO

message: Not important enough for the real page, I suspect: IMHO is also the name of a Common Lisp Web application development framework -- Internet Meta Humble Objects -- see, e.g. http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cl-imho.html --FOo 00:57, 19 Oct 2003 (UTC)

message: The French interwiki should be removed, it's about a publishing house of the same name. 86.205.91.200 (talk) 21:09, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. - TexasAndroid (talk) 21:17, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interwiki
Talk:Barbara Dever

message: The cited sources do  not  alone assert notability. Coverage must  be significant - one published source may  be inadequate while others may  not  be reliable. Further information  regarding  the type and number sources required to verify  claims made in  biographies of performing  artists, and establishing  notability  can be found at WP:RS,  WP:GNG, and WP:ENT. --Kudpung (talk) 02:35, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP sources -  see page top  notice. 
Talk:Cuban Missile Crisis

message: The article claims that '(the practical effect of the Kennedy-Khrushchev pact' was that ... the Soviets had no intention of resorting to nuclear war if they were out-gunned by the US.' 
How was this an effect of the pact? I see no such claim in either of the sources. The Soviets were already out-gunned to begin with, so it was not a matter of 'if'; there is no indication that they had ever had an intention of resorting to nuclear war first, even less so while out-gunned, which obviously would have been suicidal, or that they had ruled out resorting to nuclear war if attacked, or that their intention to do either of these things or lack thereof was due to Kennedy somehow dissuading them during the Cuban Missile Crisis. 87.126.21.225 (talk) 07:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claim about the 'practical effect of the Kennedy-Khrushchev pact' 

message: The article is not consistent about Italy. The fifth paragraph from the top says there has been debate about Italy. The box on the right treats it as certain that Italy was involved. 2A00:23C7:99A5:9E01:B5EE:EEE7:8444:69BF (talk) 11:08, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The missiles in Italy were dismantled afterwards, whether or not it was part of a direct agreement between Kennedy and Khrushchev. (Aardi18 (talk) 15:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Italy