lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Legends of Catherine the Great

message: Paragraph 2 suggests that her age at death is proof that she could not have attempted carnal relations with a stallion at that time. However, Paragraph 5 allows that she had many lovers well into her advancing years. This seems contradictory, though I admittedly have no clear image of what additional physical strain a stallion in harness would prove against the constitution of a senior noblewoman, beyond that which her coterie of covert carnal courtiers might regularly thrust upon her.
--Markzero 11:35, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of these stories were invented by Western TV for raising ratings. It's not necessary to treat them seriously.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.80.170.74 (talk) 13:29, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

text: If you try looking up other subjects on the NationMaster page you cite, you'll find numerous articles on numerous topics which are almost word-for-word copies of the corresponding Wikipedia article. I think it more likely that the copying is going in the other direction. Iglew (talk) 20:43, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any evidence to suggest that there is a genetic disposition towards zoophilia? 
Unsubstantiated allegations involving her distant relative, Prime Minister Cameron and the head of a deceased pig indicate more research  into the matter could indeed be justifiable, despite the Austerity budgets being responsible for the suicides of numerous disabled UK citizens. 
79.74.105.60 (talk) 17:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  David Cameron related #PigGate allegations scandal ?  

message: The following section was near the beginning of the article:  "She traveled from Germany with her mother in January 1744. When they reached Russia, the Empress Elizabeth took a great liking to Sophie (Catherine), but her nephew, Peter (Catherine's husband), who was mentally and physically undeveloped, hated the country he was to reign over, and admired Frederick the Great of Prussia, who was a hero to him."  
This seems to have nothing to do with the subject of the article (urban legends about Catherine), in addition to being unsourced, though there's probably a source out there that would confirm.  I've removed it as being off topic, unless someone else can make a connection to urban legends and add a source as well. TheBlinkster (talk) 23:37, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extraneous material 

message: — Assignment last updated by Jakethehuman (talk) 14:06, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Composition II
Talk:Scottish Militia Bill

message: If this is the bill Anne vetoed, then (a) why it called "Militia Act 1707" instead of Bill.  Also, why does List of Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom Parliament, 1707-1799 link to it, and give it a chapter number, no less?!
I think this is a different act to the bill that Anne vetoed.  Morwen - Talk 11:43, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree. The name of the article must be wrong, but I am not sure what it should be. 
--KURANDO 11:47, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's tricky.  Bills and acts didn't have short names back then.  Whilst most acts have been retrospectively given short names, and we use those, obviously this didn't happen with bills. Morwen - Talk 12:00, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Propose change of
"It was the last bill passed by both Houses ever to be refused royal assent."
to
"It is the latest bill passed by both Houses to be refused royal assent."
Unless I am mistaken, the power to refuse RA still remains with the current monarch? 85.227.226.168 16:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes but they'd never dare use it except in very extreme circumstances that are unlikely to arise. Timrollpickering (talk) 10:04, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The last time I checked, it was good English to use 'last' to mean 'most recent'. Let's keep to clear, normal language in the article.Earthlyreason (talk) 08:05, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  last/latest 

message: Some documents, including at the UK Parliament site, give the date of the bill as 1707, not 1708.  But this is simply a matter of the parliamentary year, to 25 March, being labelled '1707'.  So let's not be confused by it.  Keep 1708 as the date. (see here).
:This has confused me. Before about ten years ago, every source on google scholar seemed to say 1707; that indeed is what I had always understood. J Waldron (2005-2006) Fordham Law Review says it's 1708, and cites "Queen Anne's veto is recorded as "La Reine se avisera" in 18 H.L. Jour. 506 (1708)." Does anyone know more about this or any other sources? Wikidea 17:27, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 1707 or 1708
Talk:Lazistan Sanjak

message: We have an IP editor who keeps reinserting unsourced material about a group of Turkish Germans trying to proclaim an Islamic Emirate of Lazistan.  Even if it were sourced, imaginary micronation information is rarely notable.  A quick Google confirmed for me that there is no information on this in English.  Until a reputable source can be provided, I don't think this sort of highly dubious material should be included.  This is the sort of material hoaxers love to add so it need to be treated with suspicion. Carolina wren (talk) 08:14, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Islamic Emirate of Lazistan
Talk:Phare

message: Well, as citisen of Czech Republic I've heard about PHARE really in manny occasions, but now that is the first time, I can see, for what the abbreviation stands. I suppose that the abbrev is much more widely known than the full name and should be not only highlighted in the text but also possibly the article should be moved back to the name PHARE. In Czech republic it is widely recognized as the program PHARE. Reo On  |  +++ 03:15, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Czech 

message: Why does TACIS redirect to Technical Aid to the Commonwealth of Independent States and Phare not redirect to Poland and Hungary: Assitance for Restructuring their Economies? Also, there would appear to be a lack of correlation in the Uppercase/Lowercase use; either Tacis and Phare are both lower case, or both uppercase. 62.72.110.11 12:16, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Phare and Tacis 

message: The grammar in the objectives section suggests that the article was written in 2003 or 2004. This should be rewritten all in the past tense now in 2014.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.20.2.80 (talk) 14:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  past
Template talk:Cricket-bio-stub

message: Shouldn't this be called  so that it's named like, say, ? Enochlau 12:04, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? What about  and all of the other national cricket bio stubs?  See the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cricket#Why has template cricketbio-stub been moved to cricket-bio-stub? -- ALoan (Talk) 10:52, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Stubs relating to sports usually have one hyphen less than all other stubs per an old convention, e.g. . WP:WSS is aware of this, but so far no consensus has been reached regarding renaming all of them (it is rather a lot of work.) New splits should be "-cricketbio-stub" to be consistent with existing material. Regards. Valentinian (talk) 11:01, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the explanation, Valentinian. Based on this, I've moved this template back to cricketbio-stub. Stephen Turner (Talk) 11:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Riemann–Stieltjes integral

message: Some more text w.r.t. intuition would be appreciated. In the introduction it states that it generalizes the Riemann integral. One line in what exact is generalized without having to go back to that definition would be nice. Suppose to see this side-by-side:
: \int_a^b f(x) \, dx,  
And:
: \int_a^b f(x) \, d g(x) 
Then, it would be nice to have some visualisation for different choices of g(x). And see the difference with just integrating with dx. The visualization with rows versus columns w.r.t. Lebesgue vs Riemann is really nice. It demonstrates the idea immediately. A visualisation of a function that cannot be integrated by Riemann, but can be integrated by Riemann-Stieltjes would also be appreciated. And last, but not least, a visualisation of a function that cannot be integrated by Riemann-Stieltjes, but by something more general, would be awesome. Then you really see the limitations of a method.
Andy (talk) 21:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intuition 

message: The page states that the integral is not defined if the integrator and the integrand share a point of discontinuity.  However, the proper condition is that they share a common-sided discontinuity.  A counterexample to the former condition is the following: the integrator is the characteristic function of [0, 1/2] and the integrand is the characteristic function of [1/2, 1]. Integrating from 0 to 1, let P be the partition {0, 1/2, 1}. It is easy to check that the difference of the upper and lower sums over P is 0.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.192.26.106 (talk) 15:18, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  error in wikipedia page 

message: Considering I just wrote a paper for my real analysis class that got a perfect score from my professor, should I do anything with it? I've only begun trying to contribute to Wikipedia so I'm trying to not make any blunders. Here's a link .
- Anastas5425 21:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: contributions?

message: There is no reference for the rectifier subsection, and the reader cannot find a proof.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.66.166.248 (talk) 16:28, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rectifier Reference
Talk:Propeller Arena

message: This article gives the impression that this game was totally unreleased. However, I've found that it was given a Japanese release (according to here: http://www.segagagadomain.com/dreamcast-ntsc2/propeller.htm). I think the article should have some information on this. Theswillman 07:27, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese release 

message: There is no mention here of the voice chat feature of this game.  Using the microphone available with either Seaman or Alien Front Online, this game supported voice chat with other broadband players in online games.  I still have a gold master around for this somewhere (yes, it was that close to release), and I really wish it would have made a commercial release.  We were all disappointed when it was cancelled. Fehrgo 15:25, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: added some info, thanks Compn (talk) 18:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice chat 

message: It says it was leaked, which means it was only published accidentally. Why didn't they just intentionally release it for free? Either way they wouldn't make any money from sales; at least if they released it for free people would still be able to enjoy it if they weren't offended by the similarity to 9/11.
Also yes, I know you couldn't officially just download a game and run it on the Dreamcast. But it was still very much possible, even on an unmodified console. So they could still publish the disc image somewhere for people to play in that way.
flarn2006 [u t c] time: 01:19, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why didn't they just release it for free?
Talk:Melvin White (murderer)

message: Could the following sentence be explained in a proper manner:
:"He also molested a pre-school aged relative when he was between the ages of 10 and 12"
It's just that I have never heard of an eleven-year-old pre-schooler. 203.214.41.115 12:34, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maritime Union of Australia

message: We need a few paragraphs about the dispute which was one of the most exciting and significant. 193.51.149.216 15:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  1998 dispute 
Talk:In the News

message: I remember watching the first segments on Saturday mornings in 1971. In my memory, it was first entitled "In the Know" for a short time before changing to "In the News." If my memory's accurate, the article should reflect this name change. JimmyTheSaint 07:13, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember "In The News", but I also remember in the Fall Preview issue of TV Guide in 1971 or 1972, or slightly later, that it mentioned that "In The Know" would be added as well by CBS to its station breaks. As to content, I remember a feature showing the building of the Berlin Wall, so I wonder what early 70s event triggered the telling of that story. GBC 14:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  original title? 

message: Didn't Doug Poling narrate a few of the segments?  I seem to recall that. --Dj (talk) 00:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doug Poling?
Talk:Roseland NYC Live

message: Are we sure the liner notes for the CD version are correct? The DVD liner notes seem to differ on some of the tracks. For example, the DVD liner has Barrow doubling Deamer on drums (which the video corroborates). 114.78.112.219 (talk) 09:15, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  correlation of liner notes between CD and VHS/DVD versions
Talk:Fermi liquid theory

message: IMHO author made very big mistake in the definition of Fermi liquid. There are some other quantum liquids which are not Fermi liquids despite the fact thet are composed of fermions.
Fermi liquid is theoretical model for describing interacting Fermions. One of the many models (see e.g. Luttinger liquid), co that's not true it is generic for Fermi liquids.
62.179.49.22 18:43, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fermi liquid vs. non-Fermi liquid 

message: I've done some tidying up (headings, links etc.) but I'm not a physicist so I don't know whether the article is correct.  Does anyone object if I remove the Cleanup tag?  Biscuittin (talk) 23:24, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Ref 18 is an example in the field, but probably we can find much better and more important examples (I suspect this one has never been cited in the literature)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.19.1 (talk) 08:44, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refs 

message: I assume this means thermal resistance, rather than electrical resistance. Can anyone confirm this? Biscuittin (talk) 09:42, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resistance 

message: There is a redirection from Fermi sea to this article, although the two notions are different. Clement.analogue (talk) 19:47, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fermi sea 

message: What is ω in the Green's function? What is difference between ω and є?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 133.1.150.32 (talk) 05:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description 

message: why do we not cite Landau's original paper? it is fairly readable.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.17.71.110 (talk) 18:45, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure it could be useful. May you provide a link? --MaoGo (talk) 18:47, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cite Landau's Paper
Talk:Robin Knox-Johnston

message: isnt the suhali being re comissioned?
:True. Has been, and now sails at some events, still based at NMM in Cornwall. Updated article. mervyn 14:04, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I can't find a link to confirm but he's a knight batchelor so he should as most of the google links I checked have his CBE and RD.Alci12 15:21, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post Noms 

message: Are these two sentences describing the same event? If so, was it 2006 or 2007?...
"In 2006 he became at 67 the oldest yachtsman to complete a round the world solo voyage in the VELUX 5 Oceans Race." (lead section).
"He completed his second solo circumnavigation of the world in the yacht SAGA Insurance on 4 May 2007, finishing in 4th place in the VELUX 5 Oceans Race." (Further exploits).  Mike Spathaky (talk) 13:46, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Second solo circumnav
Talk:Lee Mirecki incident

message: Instead of Lee Mirecki, the article's name should probably be changed to read "Lee Mirecki incident".  The incident is notable, not the individual involved. Cla68 08:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: "Lee Mirecki Incident" is vague. The title should be a clear statement of what occured: "Murder of Lee Mirecki" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:642:c481:4640:855c:ecdf:f3b:b814 (talk) 08:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: "The Killing of Lee Mirecki:  How the Truth got Smurfed" Hardball1Alpha (talk) 19:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for a change of title

message: This article says he died on March 2, but also includes the line "On March 2, Mirecki had left the pool, saying he was resigning from the Navy, however he tried again the following day."  How did he try again the day after he died?  --Pascal666 22:00, 30 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong date(s)
Talk:Washington Place

message: Washington Place is also the location of the Triangle shirtwaist factory fire in New York City, on March 25, 1911.
There were 146 victims in all, 129 of them women. 
They were Russian and Sicilian, nearly all of them supporting distant families, nearly all of them terribly young. 
The outer building did not burn; it still stands at 23-29 Washington Place.
ref:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/23/opinion/23wed4.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha211 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_Shirtwaist_Factory_fire  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alphachapmtl (talk • contribs) 16:42, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That fire took place in New York, not Hawaii, so they are probably not the same place. More likely, there are many streets in English-speaking countries with the name of "Washington Place", and the current address at least of that event is on the one in New York City. Not sure what you are proposing. Probably that ref could be added to the fire article. Not sure if a hatnote or "See Also" might be called for. No reason for a dab page or name change until another wikipedia article on another notable entity with this name is written, I think? W Nowicki (talk) 20:51, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire
Talk:Skogskyrkogården

message: See AFD for details. The best course of action would be to merge the text in the other article that is not copyvio, and then turn the other article into a redirect. A sysop can delete the copyvio text from the history logs as well. encephalon 13:13, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: AFD

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
What about a change to Woodland Cemetery, Stockholm? --evrik (talk) 18:47, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose — the official website uses both names in English, suggesting that "Woodland Cemetery" is just a clarification for non-Swedish speakers, and, more importantly, UNESCO uses the name Skogskyrkogården exclusively. --Stemonitis 07:53, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Oppose per Stemonitis.--Húsönd 00:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. --Stemonitis 07:21, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename?

message: Tim Bergling aka Avicii (1989-2018), Swedish musician, DJ, remixer, and record producer, was not interred here. The cremation took place at this facility and the service. The interment is at Hedvig Eleonora Churchyard. Ref: here. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 08:08, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks to me like 4-5 sock puppets are doing this (and only this) over and over. Maybe an IP check & block is in order? --SergeWoodzing (talk) 02:39, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Repeated addition of incorrect info
Talk:Opposites Attract

message: Um...why is there information about the song "Cold Hearted" in this article...when it's supposed to be about "Opposites Attract"? o.o--Lady Rouge 13:20, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

message: In case you didn't know, the other animated characters who appear in this video are Micetro (a mouse), Fatz (the short one), and Taboo (the one in shorts). I found that out from part of the lyrics in a song called "Big Time" from the album released in 1991. I'm surprised nobody's posted the lyrics for all of the songs online...yet. --Secret C (talk) 06:12, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  One fact I'd like to point out 
Talk:Mesa Verde National Park

message: This looks like the only article on wikipedia that uses "Pueblonians".  Should it just be "Puebloans" throughout? Faolin42 (talk) 23:30, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, "Puebloans" or even "Pueblo" is more correct. 165.83.47.253 (talk) 20:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pueblonians vs Puebloans 

message: The state of Colorado approved a vehicle license plate to represent Mesa Verde National Park in 2019. The proceeds made from that license plate go directly to benefit the park. Would this article be appropriate to display the history, legislation, picture of the plate, and significance of the plate on this article? Or would be it be more appropriate to make a separate article for the license plate information?  StandardPolicy (talk) 05:57, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mesa Verde National Park License 

message: Mesa Verde National Park and the National Park Service are discouraging the use of the word "ruins" because modern Pueblo people actively use archeological sites and Kivas for prayer and ceremonies. Better words might include "cliff dwellings" or "archeological sites". Cjwilson2021 (talk) 22:05, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ruins"
Talk:Politics of Catalonia

message: This sentence "Catalan nationalist and federalist movements arose in the nineteenth century"  is at least  NOT NEUTRAL Many sources would agree that it started the same day Catalonia loosed the war against Castilla (September 11, 1714, by the way the National Day of Catalonia). Please see the House of Lords Journals of these dates. Another point of view should be added.
=== References ===
* Documents about the case of the catalans dated on 1714, at the House of Lords, UK.
* Journal of the House of Lords: volume 19, 2 August 1715, Further Articles of Impeachment against E. Oxford brought from H.C. Article VI.
* The birth of a nation at the Museum of the History of Catalonia site.
--Paco ✉ 00:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not neutral sentence 

message: * Documents about the case of the catalans dated on 1714, at the House of Lords, UK.
* Journal of the House of Lords: volume 19, 2 August 1715, Further Articles of Impeachment against E. Oxford brought from H.C. Article VI.
* The birth of a nation at the Museum of the History of Catalonia site.
--Paco ✉ 00:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Booted macaque

message: I have posted a long comment in the Talk section of the main Macaque genus article, about the renaming of all the macaque species articles to "[Name] Macaque" (e.g. "Barbary Macaque") from their traditionally names (e.g. Barbary Ape).
Would you please take a look at that here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Macaque#Killer_Dolphins
And then correct this individual species article as necessary — I'm not sure which macaque species may have actually been called "[Name] Macaque" traditionally.
(And I hope you can see that the fact that I don't know that, after reading a Wikipedia article about the species, is why rewriting reality in Wikipedia is a problem.)
Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.180.30.135 (talk) 12:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Killer Dolphins