Talk:Courtenay Place, Wellington

message: ok now we have a real article, lets beat it into shape, no more trivial pursuits. This article links to many nz categories pages, some of which I had to create to fulfil the intent of wiki for NZ. So now I learn about categories and how they work. There has been a category for streets and squares all along!!!  as far as i can tell this article has more research and cross referencing than most, and is in need of cosmetic adjustments. Auckland was a bit ahead of us in this guys, lets pull together now. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wellington There is plenty of room for buildings and areas of significance for all to work on. The Embassy Theatre is worthy of it's own page. One of the things I notice when i research topics such as this, is the lack of NZ pages about notable New Zealanders. 
Imagine if the CourtenayPlace.com  street scroll worked like this one in Auckland: Street Scroll Thats the best functionality I've seen for such a purpose. moza 17:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Courtenay Place]] Article Major work done

message: Google search of Courtenay Place turns up 1.4Million results with the top 50 mostly about Courtenay Place, Wellington,  I can't find any others easily... and why would i try harder?moza 07:25, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: actually i was wrong, sorry, #9 is about the English place, but only the wiki article.moza 07:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many Courtenay Places exist that have notability for inclusion?

message: I mean, do we really need a photo of blanket man? That big white space is just annoying. Willnz0 23:23, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: oh well at least you asked, thats good. You could have adjusted it so the white space reduces perhaps? how many precisely is too many, isnt a picture worth a thousand words? have you been there? how would people from around the world know what it was like without pics? have you given any pics to wiki? how many have been deleted from articles that youve contributed them to? we need about 100 pov's to get near a statistically valid result so thats not gonna happen is it. There are more than a million articles to pick on and go deleting or building, and nearly all of them need it more than this one, so i'm a little perplexed. anyway, thanks for not rushing in and messing it like ive seen done before, yours is a much better approach. I would like to understand though, how anyone can have the notion of too many pics, why and how do you arrive at that? Another point is that the white space changes according to the computer and a pile of settings that you use to look at it with, and its different for many others, so be aware of that please. go here User:Paul_Moss/gallery and you really will see a page with too many pics, but i dont have anyone to help sort it. moza 11:57, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many photos! 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Courtenay Place, Wellington. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060402210211/http://ignite-direct.com/ to http://www.ignite-direct.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified