lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Field Precision

message: Proposed changes to Field Precision entry
1) Short technical description of several unique finite-element techniques developed for high speed simulations of charged particle guns, magnets and X-ray sources along with external links to our relevant publications in refereed journals.
2) Collection of external links to publications by outside organizations using our codes illustrating variety of applications for 2D and 3D finite-element simulations on PCs.
Would this answer the objections and provide worthwhile information for inclusion in Wikipedia?  Humphriesk (talk) 19:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Here Comes Summer

message: When this song was recorded by others, did they change the lyrics from Jerry Keller's original lyrics?  There are variants posted at several lyrics sites, attributed to Jerry Keller, that barely resemble the Jerry Keller recording, other than repeating the phrase, "here comes summer" several times. — QuicksilverT @ 20:21, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate lyrics
Talk:Blackburn Blackburn

message: Do we know the date of first flight? Drutt (talk) 12:56, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

message: ...but how the jiminy did it end up being called the Blackburn Blackburn? Whose choice was that? What did crews etc. call the thing when in service?
Baron Von Joy (talk) 21:07, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stupid question... 

message: The infobox claims 44 were built, but the article body claims there were three prototypes, 33 of the Mk.I and 29 of the Mk.II. That gives a total of 65. 2A02:C7F:2CC5:5A00:A071:22CB:DCF3:5068 (talk) 19:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Jackson's Blackburn Aircraft since 1909 (pp. 168–169) gives three Mark I prototypes and 30 production Mark Is. The Mark II prototype was a conversion of the first Mark I prototype and this was followed by 29 production Mk IIs (a total of 62 aircraft). Jackson also notes (p. 164) that "many [Mk Is] eventually returned to Brough to be modified up to Mk II standard".Nigel Ish (talk) 22:50, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Number built
Talk:Arch-gravity dam

message: The list page for arch-gravity (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Arch-gravity_dams) does not list Theodore Roosevelt Dam (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_Roosevelt_Dam). There could be others missing.
Does anyone know why? G3k7sf8dx3kcd6 (talk) 14:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What could be the reason not all the individual dam pages are show on the list page?
Talk:De Havilland Fox Moth

message: I have recently finished rebuilding and  am now flying DH83C Fox Moth ZK-APT S/No FM48. I can supply accurate and up to date info on all aspects of the Fox.The English 83 did not use a Tiger undercarriage as it had it's own specific design The Canadian 83C uses  modified DH82C components. The engine bearers on both English and Canadian are also not Tiger and are also type specific. I wish to correct the oft repeated misinformation that the Fox uses the 82's u/c and bearers. The wooden structure of the 82's wing is used with Fox strut and root fittings. The empennage on both English and Canadian are 82 parts,(the Canadian with elevator trimtabs)The lower part of the rear fuselage from cockpit aft is identical to the DH60G Moth.  
 I also own and operate an 84A Dragon and a Moth Minor and am currently rebuilding a Tiger and a Moth Major.For any other info or help I can be contacted at vintageaircraft@xtra.co.nz or ##6494263735. (New Zealand.)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.153.243.112 (talk) 00:15, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Fokker M 7

message: #REDIRECT Talk:Fokker M.7
There is understandable confusion about the early fokker aircraft, with multiple designations for the same type and lack of info. I have brought this into line with Peter Gray's German Aircraft of the First World War. This is an old book so more accurate info may be forthcoming, by all means incororate any you can find.Petebutt (talk) 15:08, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:MLB 08: The Show

message: On the info box it says Released, even through it is January 1st. I've tried screwing with it and it goes blank. Can anyone make it say Release date? --HPJoker Leave me a message 19:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Released

message: http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3164884 JAF1970 (talk) 18:20, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1UP preview
Talk:Youmex

message: Until Collectonian can sort out what is and is not vandalism, and stop abusing Twinkle to revert without giving any valid reasons why, this article will remain protected. For the record, it should be noted that I protected the article in the version preferred by Collectonian, not the version I prefer. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 03:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is now protected

message: I have listed the following items which are in the JAWP article, but for which I haven't been able to find references yet. Any help finding the references is appreciated. Some of the JAWP links may not have articles.
===Productions===
*Machine Robo: Revenge of Cronos (:ja:マシンロボ クロノスの大逆襲, 1986-1987)
*Dragon Fist (:ja:ドラゴンフィスト, 1991)
*Hōkagō no Tinker Bell (:ja:放課後のティンカー・ベル, 1992)
*Ashita e Free Kick (:ja:あしたへフリーキック, 1992-1993)
*Genki Bakuhatsu Ganbaruger (:ja:元気爆発ガンバルガー, 1992-1993)
*Wild Knights Gulkeeva (:ja:獣戦士ガルキーバ, 1995)
*Gakuen Benriya series "Antique Heart" (:ja:学園便利屋シリーズアンティークハート, unknown)
===Soundtracks and other music===
*Baby and Me (:ja:赤ちゃんと僕, 1996-1997)
Now, I have the Baby and Me soundtrack, and it's released under the Futureland label, TYCY-5516 on 1996-09-11 for ¥3000. I haven't found anyplace yet that lists it as Futureland, though I haven't looked too hard yet. Any help is appreciated. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, just spent a short bit looking again and found a reference for the soundtrack. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced items from JAWP article 

message: *Baby and Me (:ja:赤ちゃんと僕, 1996-1997)
Now, I have the Baby and Me soundtrack, and it's released under the Futureland label, TYCY-5516 on 1996-09-11 for ¥3000. I haven't found anyplace yet that lists it as Futureland, though I haven't looked too hard yet. Any help is appreciated. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:56, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, just spent a short bit looking again and found a reference for the soundtrack. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Soundtracks and other music
Talk:The Burning (play)

message: This page doesn't look like much at the moment, but I and a friend (the IP address) will be working on improving the text. So please hold off with deleting it!
Thanks,
shas (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to carry on, its been 3 and a half years now! Jezhotwells (talk) 22:58, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Start..!
Talk:R v Constanza

message: how can you say this conviction is correct they have not even spelt the appellants name right not bothered to check his details seems there not interested in the facts just creating there own facts some just cause to what is stated below as how can you prove your own case when the state holds the resources to investigate it picks and chooses what to say is the Truth when has any court voluntarily given notice that its been incompetent in what it does never it has to be shamed into action as they have very little conscience for telling the Truth —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.68.31.231 (talk) 08:52, 2 January 2008 (Insert footnote text hereUTC) 
I AM THE APPELLANT NAMED IN THIS CASE 
i was in court on the 6 MARCH 1997 HOW MORE CAN YOU GET I WAS THERE
:Your presence there does not fit the encyclopedia's guideline of reliable source, which was the point I was hoping you would take when I referred you to the link. I could say I was there too, but how could you prove otherwise? If you can find an external reliable source, such as a newspaper report, that backs up the points you want to make, then add the information along with the citation. If you can't provide a source, any editor can remove any information from the encyclopedia. Again, please read the links I provide to give you the information you need to properly edit the encyclopedia. Doonhamer (talk) 20:39, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

message: If you are curious why I was insistent about removing the above from the article, it is because Wikipedia has policies that you must follow with regard to:
*Neutral point of view
*Verifiable information
*Reliable sources
Additionally, Wikipedia is not a soapbox. You are certainly entitled to your opinion of the merits of the case, but Wikipedia is not the place to voice them. You are also entirely welcome to edit the encyclopedia, but please read the links in the list above to understand the proper way to do so. Thank you. Doonhamer (talk) 20:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Because he or she is not here to discuss the matter. I have added a flag at the top of the article that notifies the reader that the article is missing reliable sources. Doonhamer (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I should point out that there actually is a citation given in the information box in the right-hand side of the article. Presumably, a reader could retrieve the document cited and verify the facts of the case. Doonhamer (talk) 20:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

text: (uninvolved editor)  Per WP:CARCASS, there really was no reason for you to revive this case, especially in ALL CAPS SHOUTING. --k6ka (talk | contribs)  11:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

text: (uninvolved editor) WP:FREESPEECH. Also, please sign your posts on a talk page (like this one) by adding four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Also, please stop posting in all caps. It's extremely disruptive and negates civil collaboration. --k6ka (talk | contribs)  11:37, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Response to the above
Talk:Beijing Olympic Broadcasting

message: This is just a copy of http://en.beijing2008.cn/bocog/organization/n214071836.shtml DarkAudit (talk) 03:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I reverted the Volnet edits which added the copyvio material. — Athaenara  ✉  05:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total cut and paste 
Talk:Mitsutoshi Furuya

message: The Japanese wikipedia page lists a whole slew of works, as well as more details of his career, available for translating. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Room for expansion 
Template talk:Naval Vessel Register

message: I have added two parameters to the NVR template based on discussion at Template talk:DANFS.  It accepts up to two external links to NVR entries.  If you don't provide a parameter, and simply use , it gives the same result as before:
Using  produces this:
Using  produces this:
I don't know why you would want to include two links, but I had just added the two-link functionality to  and figured it couldn't hurt to add it here. TomTheHand (talk) 16:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link parameters added 

message: 
Dear admins:
I propose the following relatively minor changes be made to this template.
First, the :Category:Attribution templates is superfluous because the template is already in :Category:United States government attribution templates.  It should be removed.
Secondly, the category within the "includeonly" tags, :Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating text from public domain works of the United States Government, should be changed to :Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the Naval Vessel Register.  (I have been trying to break up the former category a bit, because it is very large.)
Additionally, you may want to consider putting one of those "padlock" templates on here to show everyone that this is a fully-protected template.
Thanks.  --Eastlaw talk ⁄ contribs 02:00, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --- RockMFR 05:11, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category changes 

message: Template currently reads:
*
Suggested change to:
*This article includes information from the Naval Vessel Register which is in the public domain .
This would simplify reading
--Brad (talk) 03:26, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, yes, yes.  Do this!--Trappist the monk (talk) 17:06, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested wording change 

message: Greetings and felicitations.  In the template, please change this
: This article includes information collected from the Naval Vessel Register, which, as a U.S. government publication, is in the public domain.
to this:
: This article includes information collected from the Naval Vessel Register, which, as a U.S. government publication, is in the public domain.
as the title of the article "Naval Vessel Register" is italicized. —DocWatson42 (talk) 05:40, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: (Most recent editors): Hello? —DocWatson42 (talk) 09:03, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move. I will leave implementation to a knowledgeable editor   (t · c) buidhe 03:19, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:NVR →  – As per the recent move of Template:NVR url * Pppery * it has begun... 21:53, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 October 2020
Talk:Hank Kaplan

message: This article is so NPOV that it almost reads as a copyvio from his funeral program. Here are some of the biggest (uncited) POV problems:
#Known as a humble man, always wearing one of many of his prized boxing baseball caps, and smoking a pipe, he is widely regarded as the nation's foremost boxing historian, and was known and respected worldwide.
#He was a proud active member of HOA (Hassidic Orphanage Assylum) for many years, where he found dear friends for life, and participated in annual events throughout his entire lifetime.
#He considered this to be one of his major accomplishments, and although not a bragging man, he often shared this accomplishment of his with others with pride.
Please people, this is an encyclopedia, not a biography written by a relative. This article needs a complete rewrite to conform to Wikipedia's quality standards. Cheers, CP 20:13, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Will review it soon. Cheers, CP 00:48, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Legend of Qin (TV series)

message: The article List of Qin's Moon settings is recently split off of this article. Unfortunately, is is am article that has a lot to be desired, like context and internal links. It looks far better that this article is merge into this article again. That gives it links and context. The present article will not become excessively long by the addition. Night of the Big Wind talk 14:01, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree Athleek123 (talk) 00:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: I propose to correct the English text over the next month and make some changes to the content to more accurately reflect the TV series.
The aim is to 'cleanup' the article and improve the content.
Ricbolzan (talk) 22:03, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text Review
Talk:Mike Mitchell (director)

message: Your director seems like a very creative man. The information about the roles he did in his movies make this article worth digging into. If you want to expand on it, maybe add some more biographical information. You have a lot of info about his career, but maybe dive into some of his work and extract some similarities that he likes to address in his films. I mostly fixed grammatical errors and repetitive usages in your sentences, but other than it was a great article to review!
Zappalajohn (talk) 21:55, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Peer Editing Review by zappalajohn
Talk:Petworth House

message: Surely something wrong here.  How could the castle be FOUNDED by Henry de Percy (1564 - 1632) if it had a 13th century chapel and undercroft??
--Dougatwiki (talk) 20:22, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Henry de Percy 
Talk:Milton House (Milton, Wisconsin)

message: As there is now a third Milton House in Wikipedia (Milton House, Milton), I'd like to suggest that this article is renamed "Milton House, Wherever" and make this a disambiguation page. All three are historic houses, so it's not obvious that any one is the primary topic. Your thoughts? Kerry (talk) 01:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  time to make this a disambiguation page 
Talk:Lakota

message: The article micronation defines them as "differ[ing] from secession and self-determination movements in that they are largely viewed as being eccentric and ephemeral in nature". I think by definition the Lakotah Republic is a secession/self-determination movement, and therefore not a micronation. --86.137.156.17 (talk) 20:25, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you read further on micronations, it talks about the number of people who are part of it and that when it is a small number, say 4 activists, it should be considered a micronation, not a country. See Principality of Sealand as an example -- (Shocktm | Talk  | contribs.) 20:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  the republic a micronation?
Talk:Dublin South-Central (Dáil constituency)

message: Took count data from here:  http://www.rte.ie/news/election2011/results/dublin-south-central.html
I'm unclear as to how 3 candidates were eliminated after the 7th count (Oisín Ó hAlmhain, Peter O'Neill, and Neville Bradley).  Did some or all of them concede at that point?
Filled in count #1 data for all candidates, and complete count data for Noel Bennett, Neville Bradley, Catherine Byrne, Colm Callanan, Michael Conaghan, Michael Mulcahy, Gerry Kelly, Paul King, and Sean Connolly Farrell.
I'm done for now, if no one else has filled the rest in by tomorrow, I'll finish it.
Kfor (talk) 14:30, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: On the seventh count question, rte's correct. Standard practice in the rules of STV counts is that multiple candidates can be eliminated if it's impossible for any of them to overtake the candidate above them. In  this case, their combined vote was 2025 and the candidate above them had 3010 votes so they were all eliminated in one hit. Valenciano (talk) 10:45, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks Valenciano! Kfor (talk) 15:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filling in count data 
Talk:Ten Chimneys

message: Photos and/or photo uploads are needed.
*HABS photos do not seem to be available for this site.
*NRHP photos linked in article taken by someone who may or may not be an NPS employee, hence public domain status is unclear.
*New photos would be helpful.
::The article has many images now, most of which appear to have been added last summer, so I have cancelled the image request. Johnson487682 (talk) 20:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Maximum operating depth

message: "This makes one to ask the question: So what is the average maximum depth a human can/is allowed to swim without body damage?"
Assuming you mean free diving (diving without SCUBA gear, using a single lungfull of air from the surface), check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-diving Ryan (talk) 11:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you mean on scuba, then see Deep diving, particularly the section Ultra-deep diving. There's also an article on Atmospheric diving suit that may be of interest. --RexxS (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: I don't think that those tables are helpful. Axl ¤ [Talk] 08:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tables 

message: The reference (Lang, M.A. (2001). DAN Nitrox Workshop Proceedings. Durham, NC: Divers Alert Network. p. 197. Retrieved 2008-06-24) given for the statement, "The maximum single exposure limits recommended in the NOAA Diving Manual are 45 minutes at 1.6 bar, 120 minutes at 1.5 bar, 150 minutes at 1.4 bar, 180 minutes at 1.3 bar and 210 minutes at 1.2 bar" seems to be inadequate. The specific recommendation was not found on the specified page or in the entire document for the matter!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ktp.kti (talk • contribs) 07:23, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The NOAA single exposure limits are on page 52 of DAN Nitrox Workshop Proceedings. I've amended the page parameter to indicate the correct page. --RexxS (talk) 15:02, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect/inadequate reference for the NOAA recommendation 
Talk:2006 Manitoba municipal elections

message: Whoever has done this page has confused myself, George Buri with my father George Buri who is in fact the actual school trustee.  This is just another example of why this site is such a farce.
:Fortunately, mistakes on this project can be corrected (and thank you for doing so).  CJCurrie (talk) 04:35, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ningbo Merchants Group

message: This "Ningbo Commercial Group" thing, is something real and mentioned in reliable sources or something someone in the Chinese Wikipedia invented? I mean, I would like to know if there are serious publications analising this or it's simply a made-up grouping without real basis. That would help to establish notability. --Urbanoc (talk) 03:33, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Researching on this, the most similar thing I found is the International Ningbo Merchants Association (世界中华宁波总商会 or 世界中華寧波總商會). The description of the association on their website make clear that it's a very different grouping to the one described in this article and in its Chinese equivalent. Their have a foundation date (2008) and a clear corporative system, it isn't a random set of businesspeople born in Ningbo. In any case, this Ningbo merchants grouping doesn't seem especially relevant. --Urbanoc (talk) 04:18, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The articles (especially the English version) seem to baseless extrapolate something that existed during the Imperial China era (similar to an European guild) and pretending is something that survived Chinese modernisation and still is a valid concept today. --Urbanoc (talk) 04:34, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?
Talk:Potez XV

message: :Potez 15 →  – Up to, and including, the Potez XXII, Potez used roman numerals for aircraft designations. Petebutt (talk) 12:03, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved as requested, and per other article names in the series. Dekimasuよ! 07:09, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 13 February 2018
Talk:Government of the 29th Dáil

message: Ministers receive seals of office, RTÉ. --candle•wicke 19:22, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 