Wikipedia talk:Featured articles

message: This is more of a little nitpick than an actual issue, but there are at least four theatrical building FAs in two separate sections. Two of them (His Majesty's Theatre, London and Theatre Royal, Drury Lane) are under the "Theatre" subheader, and the other two (Harris Theater (Chicago) and New Amsterdam Theatre) are under the "Architecture and archaeology" subheader. Should these articles all be listed under the Theatre subheader? – Epicgenius (talk) 20:44, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Would anyone object to me moving the Harris Theater and New Amsterdam Theatre articles to the "Theatre" subheader? – Epicgenius (talk) 14:48, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems reasonable. They fit a bit better there than in a general architecture section. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 17:41, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds good. I've moved the articles to the Theatre subheader. – Epicgenius (talk) 18:23, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theatre buildings 

message: I wonder if its time to split these - both have quite a few FAs added in last couple of years. I can do the separating, if there is agreement. Ceoil (talk) 22:57, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, ancient architecture tends to go with archaeology but there's a growing number of modern buildings among our FAs now... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:34, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, can see that as being subjective and tricky, and am now less sure. Waiting to see what other think, but would put ancient architecture within archaeology.  Ceoil (talk) 23:40, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree with putting ancient architecture under the archaeology subheader. – Epicgenius (talk) 20:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

text: Yes, the Corp Naomh doesn't seem to have ever been buried, & I think should be just "Art".  The Icelandic Phallological Museum seems to be natural history/biology. Johnbod (talk) 03:31, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Architecture and archaeology

message: Because I'm not sure what else to say.  Wikipedia:Requests for comment/When there is no consensus either way is not getting many responses (possibly because the WP:Feedback request system seems to be down), and I've been racking my brains to think of a page that isn't too high-traffic (e.g., WP:VPP) or too biased (e.g., WP:FTN) but still cares about content.  I picked you.  If you have an opinion about what we really ought to do when there's no consensus – when you want to add or remove content from an article, and editors just can't agree – please tell me what the right answer is.  Thanks.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 02:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a clickbait section heading 

message: 72.85.185.181 (talk) 23:15, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP (talk • contribs) 01:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 March 2024 

message: I wish to have people to support me write clear article about these tribe Wilfred Japhet Lotha (talk) 10:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  My name is Wilfred I Have Information about africa tribe in Tanzania Maasai and Nyaturu Tribe  

message: -formatting per WP:REDCAT:
#REDIRECT Wikipedia:Featured articles

 2003 LN6 22:14, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This request is an utter waste of admins' time. * Pppery * it has begun... 03:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: It follows the standard format outlined in an official guideline, so I believe it should be done. 2003 LN6 05:07, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  No. Stop bothering admins over whether or not to include a single newline. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:42, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Why can this not be formatted like the above? 2003 LN6 15:52, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 29 May 2024