Talk:Seven Kingdoms (video game)

message: Since there are separate articles for Seven Kingdoms and Seven Kingdoms II, this article needs to be revised to include only information relevant to the original Seven Kingdoms. Also, I feel that its style is too indepth for an encyclopedic entry. --Pagasaeus 23:40, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: True, it is a bit long, but that may because it needs to be broken up. If you feel it needs to be trimmed, go right ahead. Be bold. — SheeEttin {T/C} 20:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw a game in stores called Seven Kingdoms Conquests, what about that one? 81.233.196.49 (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length and depth 

message: What are the release years of each installment in this series? This basic information is missing from the article --Junuxx (talk) 20:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release years 

message: I'm not sure it's entirely necessary to highlight the differences between an official release and the 7kfans one.  At the moment 7kfans is sanctioned to make 'official' releases and I honestly don't see the need for it.  For both sakes Enlight could release it officially and the fact that Enlight itself redirects all content to 7kfans.com probably makes it just as official.
I guess I wouldn't see the need to have Ford to say this 'Ford Taurus (1999) (Ford Exhaust Pipe)' and 'Ford Taurus (2005) (FakeCompany Exhaust Pipe)' so I could be wrong.  I've opened a discussion @ 7kfans.com myself to see how everyone feels.
--Jlac1024 (talk) 13:57, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that the game was released under GPL -is- noteworthy. SpigotMap 14:00, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, but doesn't that detract from the differences to the game -- the project could infact be considered an extension of Enlight considering they're actually footing the bill and there's open dialogue about the game.  I see your point with the GPL, and I'd agree if it were GPLed and 4 years later some random person released something.  That's just my opinion though.  But I guess there is a point there though. Jlac1024 (talk) 14:04, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't notice in the article where it was highlighted as to who released what. I agree with you, they do not need to be seperate. I thought you was referring to the sentence regarding the subject being GPL'd. SpigotMap 14:15, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a problem, I figured that's where the confusion was -- sorry about that.  I'll wait to hear back from the rest of the project before I change it back as it may be in the best interest to keep them different.  Although, having Enlight 'officially' release the new versions on their homepage may not be a bad idea in general anyways. Jlac1024 (talk) 14:20, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

text: Looks like you already did it anyways.  Looks fine to me. Jlac1024 (talk) 14:25, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and changed it because of the confusion it may cause. If it was officially released under GPL, then the latest GPL release date is the latest release date. Unless someone comes up with a reason why it shouldn't be, I don't see the reason for two release dates. SpigotMap 15:09, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text on the version differences 

message: I am a 7kfan, and I do not like this article. Soon I will rewrite it. I don't know who watches this article, but is there anyone who wants to rewrite it with me? Two heads are better than one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raz0rkniaf (talk • contribs) 15:26, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article rewrite 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Seven Kingdoms (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamerevolution.com/review/33165-a-seventh-of-its-potential-review
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gamespot.com/features/awards97/index.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cdmag.com/articles/024/066/rts_feature.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091028074258/http://www.enlight.com/7k/ to http://www.enlight.com/7k/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060529114522/http://www.enlight.com/ to http://www.enlight.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:49, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified