lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:German Coolie

message: removed reference to BSL, which was directly followed with 'for its biddable and friendly nature and it's easy-going, fun-loving personality', creating confusionCeasia 15:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: BSL

message: The name of this article is inaccurate. The country of origin of the Koolie breed calls them "Koolie" or "Coolie" - not "German Coolie" see http://www.australian-koolies.info/ (more specifically http://www.australian-koolies.info/Whats%20in%20a%20name.htm), http://www.justusdogs.com.au/flex/koolie_dog/452/1, http://www.burkesbackyard.com.au/2000/archives/2000/roadtests/dog_breeds?p=1603, http://www.mypets.net.au/flex/koolie_dog/452/1, http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/koolie.htm. The older Koolie page at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Koolie&oldid=142977734 sports references whilst this current "German Coolie" page does not.
I would recommend that the name of the  article be changed back to "Koolie" as it is neutral, and have reference to the "German Coolie" and "German Koolie" naming variants and the arguments therein.
--Belfry 13:59, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming back to Koolie 

message: I just placed the redirect on the Koolie article.  As the articles are containing unverified facts I didn't transfer much of the Koolie article into this one.  If anyone with more knowledge of the subject wishes to use the Koolie article as reference it is available here Alan.ca 11:06, 7 July 2007 
(UTC)
    ::This remark was removed as unhelpful and no contribution what so ever, the Koolie club do not claim ownership over this page, the Koolie breed or any ones right to an opinion but we do expect some prior knowledge/experience if you intend to completly remove the contents of a viable page of information.Tjukurpa (talk) 10:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: remarks removed as it was not helpful, did not hold any valid or truthful information and there was absolutely no contribution whatsoever.
The comment about Canada was removed as it was a unprovoqued attack. There is no need to attack people for no reason. Research and knowledge is readily available to anyone anywhere now. It seems to me that by renaming the breed from German Coolie to Australian Koolie and by numerous comments about the "inneptitude" of others involved in this breed in other countries that this is not about a name or a breeder in particular but more about the Australian club not wanting to "share" this breed with the rest of the world. I am sure that most breeds incountered such troubles when first exporting so I extend support to those expanding the borders of this beautiful breed and remind them that other breeds surpassed these issues and so will you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.244.178.254 (talk) 21:05, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Completed from Koolie
Talk:Channon Yarrow

message: Could the barcode nipples be explained as pasties? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Roninbk (talk • contribs) .
*Considering that people in the Transmet universe turn themselves into dolphins for fun, I don't think grafting a couple of nipples on is astoundingly unlikely. --Mister Six 23:40, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Camp Chase

message: My comment regarding the Civil War Camp Chase, OH page has to do with the posted boundaries:  
According to the official Ohio Historical Markers posted on Sullivant Avenue outside the Camp Chase Cemetery, "...Boundaries of the camp were present-day Broad Street (north), Hague Avenue (east), Sullivant Avenue (south), and near Westgate Avenue (west)..."
At the Camp Chase website, scroll down to Maps of the Camp, the overlay does not extend to Sullivant Avenue; only a red star indicating where the cemetery lies in relation to the other boundaries.
The overlay of the original camp should extend to Sullivant Avenue according to the official Ohio Historical Markers.  Was the original Camp Chase entrance on Broad Street (northern boundary) or Sullivant Avenue (southern boundary)?
(Gunn pa1950 21:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I will be adding sections of the recent vandalism and on the conditions of prison life as well as adding sources to the history and lead paragraphs to make it more validated.Jamesbob2000 (talk) 23:11, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Sections
Talk:Kenana ibn al-Rabi

message: 4/16/2011: Found this page stating that Ibn Hisham's account is of torture followed by an almost bare accusation section - how misleading. This is not Ibn Hisham's account (he was just an editor), it is Ibn Ishaq's; Ibn Ishaq is one of the most notoriously unreliable historians and hadith narrators (see his page here for more).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2jw020 (talk • contribs) 00:21, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any source for the proposed changes. Jewish Encyclopedia is far from perfect, but better than original research. Pecher Talk 09:16, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

text: That's not an argument. Pecher Talk 19:51, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: PEACHER!!! Will you quite removing genuin taggings?! The tone of the article is clearly anti-islamic. Im not going to fight regarding the accuracy, since its nothing i know anything about, but the tone is obviously anti-Islamic. --Striver 23:02, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: the torture story is unreliable.
please read
http://www.authenticsunnah.org/sami_zaatri/rebuttal_to_silas_4.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unixer (talk • contribs) 
:What is unreliable is this website. Pecher Talk 20:18, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  torture 

message: Arrow740 wrote "Ibn Ishaq via Ibn Hisham is viewed as a good source for history, if not for other things, by Muslim scholars.". Arrow740, I would like to disagree, to my knowledge, there are several stories in that collection that Sunni's do not appreciate, although i don't have anything on top of my head. peace.--Striver 13:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Arrow740 your latest revert has referred to Kinana as "Ma malakat aymanukum"!! You know that only applies to women?Bless sins 19:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not true. Arrow740 20:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is. The quran says men have have intercourse with Ma malakat aymanukum. It obviously refers to women.Bless sins 20:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Quran isn't the best written book in the world. Look at the article on mma. Arrow740 04:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Arrow740, MMA is a Quranic/Islamic concept. look at the article on MMA now that I removed unsourced statements.Bless sins 21:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rv
Talk:Arthur's Theme (Best That You Can Do)

message: Anyone know why you can't buy this on the iTunes music store?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.23.56.80 (talk) 23:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While I was researching why the Golden Globes does not mention awarding a Golden Globe to Cross for this song, Songfacts has an answer for your question. This is an example of "Yacht Rock," which is easy listening music favored by rich people in the '80s. And for a movie about a rich guy, that genre is the sweet spot. Christopher Cross was the leader in this niche, mostly because of his song "Sailing." Rich guys on a boat music lol. CLOaker2 (talk) 00:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: AMAZING

message: Was Christopher Cross really one of the writers of this song? Proof from Allmusic & Songfacts says yes. The Wikipedia page says just that it won a Golden Globe which it did but not who. The Golden Globes only say that Bacharach, Sager & Allen were awarded Golden Globes. Cross comes up empty on a Golden Globe search. So who is correct or do the Globes limit how many people can receive an award in a category? Here is the Globes link. https://www.goldenglobes.com/winners-nominees/1982 CLOaker2 (talk) 00:08, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: (NB for other): the above-mentioned web page is now HTTP404 gone so the archive page is [] and the specific location is at page (3) - Best Song - Motion Picture ) --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 14:59, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: However found out and saw per Apple Music [], at Composition & Lyrics section - Christopher Cross is indeed mentioned as songwriter (along with 3 usual songwriters & Michael Omartian as string arranger) --- Cat12zu3 (talk) 15:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arthur's Theme - Golden Globes
Talk:Stand and Deliver (Adam and the Ants song)

message: you know, Sugar Ray covered this on thier album "floored".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.254.10.220 (talk) 12:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sugar Ray

message: Perhaps it should be noted that the BBC Radio 2 Jeremy Vine show uses the start of this song in one of his Idents.  
86.128.159.245 (talk) 17:57, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Jeremy Vine

message: Please note : There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs/coverversions with the purpose of trying to establish a standard guideline for merge/separate different versions of the same song. Please make known your opinions on the matter. --Richhoncho (talk) 19:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging/Separation of song articles

message: I don't view it as correct to say that this song was from the album Prince Charming. It had already gone to number one, then was issued on the album Prince Charming.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.54.246.253 (talk) 09:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince Charming 

message: Does anybodyy think it would be interesting to mention the mid 90s song "yesterday when I was mad" here? I always thought the similarities are astounding in terms of delivery of lyrics. 85.178.235.140 (talk) 15:57, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  yesterday when I was mad
Category talk:Sailboat components

message: There are too many categories in this area, some of these shouls be combined.Frank van Mierlo 02:10, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: Shouldn't Prow be included in the template and category?  Badagnani 05:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just added it EdwardLane (talk) 09:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prow 

message: Suggested merge of :Category:Sailboat components to :Category:Sailing ship components. -- B.S. Lawrence (talk) 15:37, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge w/ Sailing ship components
Talk:Digital circuit multiplication equipment

message: Stub expanded to identify relevant ITU-T recs by purpose and to give a generic description of the internal processes.  Scope for further expansion re implementation (both physical and as finite state machine), speech detection, voiceband data and data rate detection, facsimile signal compression through DCME, coding algorithms: ADPCM, LD-CELP variable bit rate and achievable quality.  Hansholbein 02:15, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tropical Storm Hermine (2004)

message: Inline sourcing, more impact, and preparations, if possible. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: Although this is a "current land-impacting storm" (which is a bad rule of thumb for articles IMO, but that is a whole different story), there is nothing really notable about this storm. According to the article, Hermine caused less than 1/2 an inch of rain in Cape Cod, and it may not even have done that because of Gaston shortly after. There was basement and street flooding in New Brunswick, but that was from the remnants of Hermine. Thus, there is next to no impact and the MH section can easily be condensed. Therefore, I propose that this article be merged.--12george1 (talk) 05:39, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I trimmed down the MH. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  05:49, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Then, it is not a current land-impacting storm if it did no impact as a TC :P YE  Pacific Hurricane 17:02, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the half inch of rain in Cape Cod does technically count. Do you support merging, YE? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  17:06, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hold on, currently doing a word count check. YE  Pacific Hurricane 17:08, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, it is 383 words, which is below my normal 450-700 word minimum range. However, this is a GA, not FA, so I think it being GA cancels it out in this case. Unlike other article I've opposed merging, I weakly support merging this. YE  Pacific Hurricane 17:18, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Mícheál Ó Muircheartaigh

message: Excellent selection of Mícheál's quotes there. Well done. El Gringo 02:32, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Great quotes

message: Should his name be spelled Micheál with no fada over the 'i'?  I'm never sure of the correct spelling.  On the cover of his book his name is spelled Micheál.  Any ideas?. CorkMan 16:51, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I agree with you El Gringo with regards the pronunciation, but he himself does spell it Micheál (going by the cover of his books anyway). Should we not change it to the way he spells it? Any opinions? Derry Boi (talk) 13:27, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: A pronunciation in the language of this encyclopedia would be helpful, would it not? 205.189.94.12 (talk) 22:43, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:White Lodge, Richmond Park

message: This page needs a rename- and a significant expansion. I will attempt to sort this myself, if there are no objections. Badgerpatrol 03:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First part= done. Badgerpatrol 02:21, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename/Expand

message: As a result of several tags, incl. advertising and cleanup etc, I have rewritten the page about the history of the house itself, its residents and significant events, and have only mentioned the fact that the Royal Ballet School have use of the building. This follows the precedent of Pembroke Lodge, Richmond Park. As this is an encyclopædia article, it shouldn't include anything relating to the school itself on a page that purely relates to the building. 
I have included an external link to the Royal Ballet School, as well as an internal link to the same. Peter symonds 20:18, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page rewritten 

message: After closely reading both articles, I think a significant portion of the White Lodge, Richmond article as dealing with the Duke and Duchess of York, actually belong in the Royal Lodge, Windsor article. Jeffrey Wyattville did not design White Lodge, but did design Royal Lodge, Windsor. And according to Sarah Bradford's biography of George VI, (pg. 115)they only lived at White Lodge, Richmond until late-1926, due to there not being space in the royal residences in London. They then acquired 
145 Piccadilly in London. Some of Queen Mary's desires to have them live there as stated in the article is true according to Bradford, but they certainly were not in White Lodge after 1927, which by that time was gifted to Arthur Lee, also in Bradford's book, pgs. 115 or 116.  Shawcross's offical biography of the Queen Mother also states on pg. 242 that before or after their return from their tour of Australia and New Zealand in 1927, they had moved out of White Lodge into 145 Piccadilly, and that they only moved to White Lodge on the insistence of King George and Queen Mary to begin with.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.69.127.200 (talk) 16:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  confusing White Lodge with Royal Lodge, Windsor
Talk:Fiesole

message: There is a link to Justinus, the Byzantine general, which actually goes to the much earlier historian of the same name. False links seem very common. I did not break this one as I am not sure how to do this cleanly. 
80.169.162.100 (talk) 09:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

message: I added soccer player Andrea Barzagli.  I know that he might not be a vastly important historical figure, but it is a fairly great honor to be added to the national team, and I think he should be included.  I don't know if you guys prefer "soccer," "football," "calcio," "futbol," or any other translation, but I'm American, and that is how I wrote it. 67.165.197.109 03:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous People 

message: Why does the second sentence refer to the study centres of US universities, which are followed by cultural references in literature? Unless there are objections, I'll tone down the peacock nature of the lead section. jxm (talk) 06:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe modify lead paragraph? 

message: To add to this article:  the etymology of the original Etruscan place name. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 03:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Education in Sydney

message: This could be a good article. But it is very light on information and me suspects it has been largely copied from other articles. I have two suggestions to improve:
1. Make it Education in New South Wales
2. More info about education regions, etc.
----
I've removed the proposed deletion template  from the article. 
While the article could be expanded to become "Education in New South Wales", further specialisation will bring this topic back anyway.  :Category:Education in Sydney already exists, and an article can summarise these topics.  As precedents, there are many similar articles — see :Category:Education by city.  -- Zigger «º» 02:00, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Sydney has a wide variety of private schools, most of which are religious (with the exception of Sydney Grammar School). I small section on them would help this rather puny article fill out a little more.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.172.84.214 (talk) 01:26, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Private Schools
Talk:Santa Rosa Island (Florida)

message: According to the article: The island was the first place where shots were fired to open the American Civil War, three months before the shelling of Fort Sumter, at the Battle of Santa Rosa Island. According to the linked article, the Battle of Santa Rosa Island was fought on October 9, 1861. This was long after the Battle of Fort Sumter which was fought on April 12 and 13 of 1861. And the First Battle of Bull Run which was fought on July 21, 1861. I didn't want to rewrite the article without giving the original author a chance to explain the discrepancy. MK2 03:07, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If anybody's still interested, the encounter in question actually happened at Fort Barrancas, which is nearby but on the mainland. It's briefly discussed there. Merenta (talk) 21:13, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Talk:Responses to Objectivism

message: I deleted the stuff sourced from some professor named "Parrot." It's not a credible source, according to Wikipedia policy. It's self-published by Professor Parrot himself. WP:V says, "Anyone can create a website or pay to have a book published, and then claim to be an expert in a certain field. For that reason, self-published books, personal websites, and blogs are largely not acceptable as sources. Exceptions may be when a well-known, professional researcher in a relevant field, or a well-known professional journalist, has produced self-published material. In some cases, these may be acceptable as sources, so long as their work has been previously published by credible, third-party publications. However, exercise caution: if the information on the professional researcher's blog is really worth reporting, someone else will have done so." Rimric press is the publisher, which is Professor Parrott's own press.  RJII 03:12, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted self-published source

message: Unless there are any specific objections I will proceed with merging in a few days  ≈ jossi ≈  t • @ 02:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Franklin & Marshall College

message: Endowment document is not current. New version available here. FY2022 Endowment valued at $396,835,000. Arterca (talk) 14:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated Endowment numbers 

message: cannot locate citation [4] in editor for some reason. This is in reference to main info box discussing campus footprint. Live link here. Their website went through a total overhaul. There may be other dead links if an archived page was not used. Arterca (talk) 14:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation [4] has dead link and others.
Talk:Deskstar

message: Unfortunately there are indications that at least the 2009 runs of these drives may have sligthly higher failure rate atleast in very early usage than one would wish for, though as of now there is no competition in this price range. I would recommend not putting in any non-backed up data for a while (< 3 months) into these.
Another issue is there are some reports of random access or multi-threaded sequential read performance issues however not enough to say whether it's some controller compatibility/ncq implementation issue or what.
I would only recommend these as of now for backup purposes only, the price is right for this purpose and performance in single threaded sequential write such as backup operation is fine.
note: I do not have first hand experience but this is from researching online reviews and relating them to competing models, a method which should give a reasonable indication of percentage of drives tending to fail when the review sample size is large enough. For example both this and HD103SJ have ~120 reviews and they were released relatively closely to each other. The other has only 3% 1 star reviews and other as 16% 1 star (poor) reviews. Source newegg. 
[by: 88.112.172.94 01:03, 15 January 2010 ]
:With all due respect to Golbez talk who deleted this section, where else would you discuss Hitachi Deskstar?  So I reinstated it.  Furthermore, IMHO it is improper to delete talk. Tom94022 (talk) 17:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: FWIW, IMO the material submitted by 88.112.172.94 is not in its current form suitable for the article, since amongst other things it violates Wikipedia's verification, neutral point of view and no original research policies. But it is interesting and relevant because the article is about Hitachi Deskstar and the model mentioned in this talk is listed in the article. Tom94022 (talk) 22:21, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitachi 2 TB 7K2 HD32000 HDS722020ALA330
Talk:Ceres (dwarf planet)

message: * World Ceres on the Main Page just in time for the World Cup? Ann Teak (talk) 20:09, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: World Ceres?

message: The redirect Sirish has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  An anonymous username, not my real name 02:43, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Sirish]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: "Piazzi observed Ceres twenty-four times, the final sighting occurring on
11 February 1801, when illness interrupted his work. He announced his 
discovery on 24 January 1801 ..."
Difficult to imagine how he could announce his discovery before his first sighting.
Can someone please clear this up? DDilworth (talk) 07:44, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date Conflict needs resolution 

message: I am beginning the process of recording this article for Spoken Wikipedia, using revision 1211270772 dated 1 March 2024. Greater Luxembourg (talk) 20:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beginning work on audio recording for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia|Spoken Wikipedia]] 

message: — Assignment last updated by Messier98 (talk) 16:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: SPAC 5313 - Planetary Atmospheres

message: See Talk:List_of_Solar_System_objects_by_size#We_CANNOT_measure_the_mass_of_any_of_these_objects, from Jamescobban (talk) 22:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  We CANNOT measure the mass of any of these objects