lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Inorganic chemistry

message: Is hydrogen until now fixed in periodic table?
If yes Then HOW? Gautam kumar sah (talk) 15:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemistry  

message: I am trying to think of ways to organize this article without reinventing what has been done and trying to avoid my (or any editor's) biases.  One idea, which I applied to agricultural chemistry, is to apply the scope of the field as defined by an authoritative journal.  For Agricultural Chemistry, I relied on the American Chem Society's Journal of Agricultural Chemistry's statement of scope.  
Below, I list excerpts from the Royal Society of Chemistry's journal and the corresponding ACS journal
*Dalton Transactions, Journal scope
**inorganic chemistry, which encompasses the organometallic, bioinorganic and materials chemistry of the elements, with applications including synthesis, catalysis, energy conversion/storage, electrical devices and medicine. ...areas of our scope is given below.
**Solid-state inorganic materials (including nanomaterials). solid-state, materials and nano-chemistry ... synthesis, characterisation, and applications of new inorganic or inorganic-organic hybrid solids, together with studies of their properties. 
**Catalysis ...This would include catalyst design and synthesis, structure-activity relationships and/or mechanistic studies. 
**Bioinorganic and medicinal inorganic chemistry...model compounds of metalloenzymes and biologically active inorganic compounds ... the sensing and visualization of biorelevant metal ions.
**Theoretical and computational studies...models of reactivity, selectivity, bonding or structure, or new computational methods.
**Analytical/separation studies and sensor development ... provided there is significant insight into the chemistry of the inorganic component.
*notice no explicit mention of coordination or main group chemistry or industrial.
*Inorganic Chemistry.   Aims & Scope:
**Coordination and Organometallic Chemistry
**Bioinorganic Chemistry
**Solid State, Materials, and Nanoscale Chemistry
**Energy and Photochemistry
**Catalysis
**Theory and Computation
*notice no explicit mention of main group chemistry.
Going to check textbook.  --Smokefoot (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible organization
Talk:Jane Austen

message: Mentioned year is wrong, both were published in 1817.
"She wrote two other novels—Northanger Abbey and Persuasion, both published posthumously in 1818—and began another, eventually titled Sanditon, but died before its completion." Adocys (talk) 22:37, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: RudolfRed (talk) 00:46, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 December 2023 

message: Michael D Sanders and Elizabeth M Graham propose systemic lupus erythematosus as a probable cause of Austen's illness and death.
‘Black and white and every wrong colour’:
The medical history of Jane Austen and
the possibility of systemic lupus
erythematosus
Michael D Sanders and Elizabeth M Graham
file:///E:/Documents/18th%20-%2019th%20CENTURY%20CULTURE/TIPS,%20ARTICLES%20&%20MISCELLANEOUS/Black%20and%20White%20and%20Every%20Wrong%20Colour.pdf 92.28.205.135 (talk) 15:04, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This 2021 paper? aka Lupus. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Geardona (talk to me?) 23:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 4 January 2024 

message: * 
* Special:Diff/1208597370
* Special:Diff/1102820283
* Special:Diff/950880377
Austen editors might like to keep an eye on a long-term slow-motion edit war, on-going since 2022, about another article saying Austen was married in Scotland in September 1789.
Uncle G (talk) 02:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage
Talk:John Stuart Mill

message: "In 1866, he became the first person in the history of Parliament to call for women to be given the right to vote, vigorously defending this position in subsequent debate."
This contradicts the assertion in the opening paragraph that he was the second. Which is correct? RyanCarey1 (talk) 18:39, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women's suffrage? 

message: The following was in the text as I read it before making a change: 
He contributed to the investigation of scientific methodology, though his knowledge of the topic was based on tiktok videos, notably William Whewell, John Herschel, and Auguste Comte, and research carried out for Mill by Alexander Bain. He engaged in written debate with Whewell.
I removed everything after scientific methodology - I suspect most of the rest of the sentence has valuable information, but I don't know how to correctly adjust or contextualize it. It would be ideal if someone with the right background could correct and reinsert it. Here's the original version with the proper formatting:
He contributed to the investigation of scientific methodology, though his knowledge of the topic was based on tiktok videos, notably William Whewell, John Herschel, and Auguste Comte, and research carried out for Mill by Alexander Bain. He engaged in written debate with Whewell. Galutnik (talk) 16:35, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has apparently fixed it since I wrote this. Thank you! Galutnik (talk) 16:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help: prank text removed; hoping someone can reinsert corrected sentence
Talk:John Ford (disambiguation)

message: note: I made The Grapes of Wrath a subpage of the novel's, as it is likely to be considered in that context, but made The Informer a separate page with Ford's name in the title, as its plot is completely distinct from the movie of the same name by Michael Mann. I did the same thing for The Fugitive, as it has no relation to the 1993 film with Harrison Ford (though perhaps it should be a subpage of a page of that name dealing with the Graham Greene novel?  How well is the novel known?)  Similarly, I expect that Rio Grande should have a separate page that is not a subset of the actual river's page.  I hope this is the correct approach.  If not, by all means feel free to change it.  :-)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Conversion script (talk • contribs) 15:51, 25 February 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems to me that John Ford would be a good candidate for primary subject disambiguation, with John Ford (film director) here at John Ford, and a disambiguation notice at the bottom or at John Ford (disambiguation). Any thoughts? —Paul A 02:07, 3 Sep 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Nobody spoke against it, so I've made the change. This page is now John Ford (disambiguation), and John Ford is the film director. --Paul A 03:40, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:James Madison

message: Hey guys. The times "in office" within "Delegate from Virginia to the Congress of the Confederation" don't follow chronological order. Maybe you guys would like to change that.
Amazing article by the way, great effort. Thiago1314 (talk) 19:40, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of topics in the infobox 

message: I added brief information on the Second Amendment. I thought it was needed for the article. It is mainly general information from Cost (2021), not meant to be political in any way. Thanks. Cmguy777 (talk) 04:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the initial purpose of the Second Amendment, was to counter the image of the British "Redcoats" standing army and reinforce the U.S. Government was established by the consent of citizens. Cmguy777 (talk) 04:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Amendment 

message: In addition to being the shortest President, Madison also weighed the least, at 100 pounds. I suggest this be added to his infobox under his height. Source: https://potus.com/presidential-facts/presidential-weight/
: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. POTUS.com is not a reliable source. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:41, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsigned Semi-protected edit request 

message: "Dissatisfied with the weak national government established by the Articles of Confederation, he helped organize the Constitutional Convention, which produced a new constitution designed to strengthen republican government against democratic assembly."
 The word "Republic" comes from Ancient Roman after overthrow of monarchy, where it then became a republic around 500 BC.  The United States became a Republic, when it declared Independence from the British Government and monarchy.  
 The word "Democracy" comes from Ancient Greek, where representative from districts would go to the capitol to vote (Not to be confused with direct voting, Referendum). Also traced back to about 500 BC.  
The two are not mutually exclusive.
Maybe someone can phrase it in a more neutral language and logical sentences.
 Example: "which produced a new constitution designed to strengthen republican government for (not against) democratic assembly."
. 76.135.37.152 (talk) 03:11, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Politically Bias Language and Ignorance of the Words "Democracy" and "Republic".
Talk:John Napier

message: I think "undoubtedly one of the most important inventions in math" and "in line with Archimedes, Newton, Einstein" is slightly exaggerated. Logarithms are an important contribution, no doubt. Maybe we could reduce the hyperbole though. --AxelBoldt
-----
I think he also wrote some religious treatises. Extreme Calvinist stuff i think. Don't how how important that was considered at the time.
-----
I thought that the decimal point was first invented by Simon Stevin.
See http://www-gap.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Mathematicians/Stevin.html for example. -- Dominus 15:05, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The Simon Stevin page says he didn't, but it credits Bartholomaeus Pitiscus with the invention of the decimal point. -- Dominus 15:07, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyperbole

message: I removed a pseudo-reference found in-line with the text. First it did not follow the Harvard Reference format. Second it barely had enough information to find the article, but I had to use a Google search, which should never be necessary with a Wikipedia reference. A properly formatted reference contains all the information a reader needs to find the reference directly. Third it contained an error: the year given was 2006, and the year I found was 2010.  Please do not put this type of quasi-reference in-line with the text. It violates all editing norms. Thanks. Nick Beeson (talk) 16:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-line reference 

message: This article states, in section Advances in mathematics, "Napier made further contributions. He improved Simon Stevin's decimal notation, introducing the period (.) a the delimiter for the fractional part." (grammar sic)
However, this statement contradicts article Simon_Stevin#Decimal_fractions, which states, "The point separating the integers from the decimal fractions seems to be the invention of Bartholomaeus Pitiscus, in whose trigonometrical tables (1612) it occurs and it was accepted by John Napier in his logarithmic papers (1614 and 1619)." David Spector (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decimal Point Contradiction 

message: Bnfnfjfjfjfhhfhfjfjfhfhfhfhffhtjhtjtjz 106.195.79.148 (talk) 12:56, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  John nepiar isa good boy hbdbejrvridrjdhhdjdjdjdjdhdjdjjdjdjjdjdndnnddnrhjrjrjrhrdhhdhdrhhr
Talk:J. D. Salinger

message: In the section "Last publications and Maynard relationship" there is an image of the actual TIME magazine cover with a portrait of J. D. Salinger. Why is the exact same painting (minus the TIME framing) beside the Death section? Could that redundant image--as beautiful as it is and no disrespect meant for the artist who created the portrait--be replaced with a photo of him from modern time? All the images seem to be from 1950 to the 1960's. I know he was described as a recluse, but there should be at least one photo from 1970 - 2010. Thanks for your consideration. CryMeAnOcean (talk) 08:33, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request to change image 

message: Hello, Wikipedians,
Just of interest, not for inclusion in the article:  I'm an alumnus of Ursinus (class of 1986).  I was amused to hear the Salinger legends that were told there.   One story was that he failed English, and that's why he dropped out.  Another was that the campus inspired the description of Pency Prep in "The Catcher in the Rye" (possible, but not too likely) right down to a description of a tree growing in the end zone of the football field-there was one, at Ursinus, but there's no such mention in the book.  Fun stories for the students, whiling away the time at a small (1100+ students, on average) liberal arts college 25 miles northwest of Philadelphia, in what was, at the time, still all farmland.
Best regardsTheBaron0530 (talk) 13:16, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salinger legends at Ursinus College
Talk:John Ogonowski

message: "John A. Ogonowski (1951 - September 11, 2001) was a pilot, agricultural activist and an American Hero."
With regards to this sentence, calling him an American hero is purely subjective. I'm not saying he isn't, but I don't think this is a place to showcase individual opinions. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.67.152.48 (talk) 23:20, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Hero 

message: His gravestone says 1951 - not 1949 Irish Melkite (talk) 07:23, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  date of birth 
Talk:Jefferson Davis

message: and his moderate approach to secession that may be able to persuade undecided Southerners.
Should read something like:
"and his moderate approach to secession, which Confederate leaders thought might persuade undecided Southerners to their cause."
or if you want to keep it in passive voice:
"and a moderate approach to secession that was deemed likely to persuade undecided Southerners" 2600:1700:5B2C:A090:B932:D75C:BFED:EDE6 (talk) 21:44, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed it to "which Confederate leaders thought might persuade undecided Southerners to support their cause." Thanks for pointing this out. Carlstak (talk) 01:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar Error 

message: Correcting birth dates of two youngest children:
William was born 1861 (not 1864); Varina was born 1864 (not 1872).
William Howell, born 1861, who died of diphtheria at age 10;[63] and Varina Anne, born 1864, who remained single and lived to be 34.[64] 73.137.166.113 (talk) 14:29, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: , verified per references already provided in article Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 15:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2024 

message: change "and an argument for the righteousness of succession" to "and an argument for the righteousness of secession." LitigiousOx (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 April 2024 

message: It disturbs me greatly that under “Allegiance” it says “United States”, that is BS. He was sworn and leader of the Confederacy AGAINST the US. He fought the Union. He was pro-slavery. 2601:602:400:FEC0:4D96:7E34:AEC1:81C7 (talk) 03:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: "He fought the Union. He was pro-slavery." So were several of the Union states, the so-called border states (Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, Missouri, and West Virginia). And Davis served the United States in the Black Hawk War and the Mexican-American War. Dimadick (talk) 05:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  allegiance
Talk:January 16

message: * 1493 - Christopher Columbus returns to Spain from his first voyage to the Americas.
is that the day he left the new world? if so, from where? i cannot find the date on the Christopher Columbus article. Kingturtle 01:03, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  columbus 

message: "Freedom fighter"?
I think the use of that time is completely incorrect.
Jan Palach staged a protest against an illegal invasion of his country.
He did not attack any of the invading forces, was not engaged in warfare.
He was a protestor.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Velkyal (talk • contribs) 12:59, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jan Palach 

message: I was thining of adding International Fetish Day to the selected anniversary list, in the section were "Teacher's Day" currently is. The problem is that it is a new observance to be held for the first time in 2009. However, it is mentioned in this article, is referenced, and I feel would be worthy of inclusion as it is an international as apposed to just a national day. ISD (talk) 08:35, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It would appear that you thought about adding it after you had already added it.  It is my assumption that when you say "selected anniversaries" you mean "Holidays and observances" because observances don't go in Selected Anniversaries.  If it hasn't happened yet, you have no way of knowing its global impact or if it will be recurring every year on the same date or if it will be widely celebrated.  Lacking all of this information would lead to the entry being removed anyway.  Checkout this for info on what can be added.  No future events means no future observances too.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 18:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, thanks for telling me. ISD (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: International Fetish Day
Talk:Jupiter (disambiguation)

message: Could someone qualified also put a reference to the space ship "Jupiter II" from the TV Series Lost in Space? Thanks. John C.
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.23.68.40 (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

message: The first list, untitled, seems to contain things of reasonable interest, important enough for a general encyclopedia, relegating more specialised, or vanity, items to the named categories further down.
I'd like to move the two towns down to miscellaneous, and to add, as a new ‘important’ entry, the magazine Jupiter, edited by ‘Tom Towers’, in Trollope’s Barsetshire novel The Warden. John Wheater 09:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: IMO, the two towns are things of reasonable interest, etc., and should remain in the first untitled list.  If this new magazine does not have a Wikipedia article of its own, I would place it in the Miscellaneous section, and then only if the linked article mentions it (so The Warden rather than Barsetshire. -- JHunterJ 11:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Order of importance

message: I referenced this disambiguation page while looking for "Jupyter Notebooks".  I had listened to a talk that made a verbal reference to "Jupyter Notebooks", and was unaware of the proper spelling.
Is it appropriate to place a reference to a homophone in a disambiguation page?
If so, could someone please add the link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Jupyter
If this is not appropriate, could you explain what other resources someone might use to find this link?
Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.102.103.104 (talk) 01:03, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project Jupyter 

message: why is this? can some1 explain  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.133.46.118 (talk) 13:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "Mercury" has more than one meaning that is very commonly used, so we consider it to have no WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. "Jupiter" has one meaning which stands well above the others in how frequently it's used, so it does have a primary topic. -- Fyrael (talk) 14:56, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Mercury]] is a disambiguation page but [[Jupiter]] is not. 

message: Jupiter (god) deserves a main entry rather than just a piped mention in the introductory sentence, but where do we put it?  At the top, because it's the most likely non-primary meaning?  #Fictional characters, at the risk of offending any remaining worshippers?  #Other uses, where no one will find it? Certes (talk) 11:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've borrowed the format from Saturn (disambiguation).  Please feel free to improve it. Certes (talk) 11:33, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Much better. older ≠ wiser 12:18, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  God
Talk:Emperor Norton

message: In this article the "Frisco" story is written as an unsubstantiated but possibly true claim. The article on the Emperor Norton Trust says that it is false, The Emperor Norton Trust. The truth should probably be investigated or the inconsistency at least corrected. LeatherJr (talk) 05:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency 

message: The lead currently says, "He had run for Congress in 1858, but was not put on the ballot." That's anachronistic. The government-printed ballot (secret ballot) had not yet been introduced in the United States in 1858. In that era, the political parties or newspapers supporting them would pre-print ballot tickets consisting of their preferred candidates and distribute them to supporters to put into the ballot box. A maverick candidate such as Norton would probably have had to print his own ballots in order to receive votes, but that's a very different situation from the way things were done later on, when a candidate has to garner petition signatures or pay a fee to have their name on the government-printed ballot. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not on the ballot? 

message: should the page be called 'Emperor Norton' if he was in truth not the emperor of anywhere? Sebimus (talk) 17:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  is the title erroneous?