Talk:Isma'il ibn Ja'far

message: It appears that a large portion of the site was directly taken from this this article, without even the references being removed. The article is credible, well-sourced, and well written, but this needs to be rewritten.
Nograpes (talk) 16:18, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content from other site 

message: The box inserted at the end of this article and other sibling articles of the Imams refers to banu Quraish. The tribe's name is just "Quraish" and the already existing redirection from "Banu Quraish" to "Quraish" testifyies to the establishing of this correction.
The previous is easy to correct. However, the box refers to the Hashimites (Banu Hashim) as a branch of the 'clan of Quraish. According to the hereditary classification of descent Banu Hashim are classified as a clan, and they are a branch of the tribe (consideration of tribes, maybe) of Quraish.
I would have fixed it but I don't see where in the box's code the word "clan" is inserted.
--A. Gharbeia (talk) 01:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lineage box 

message: This article is intended to be about an individual named Ismail ibn Jafar.
I need to bring to attention large amounts of unrelated content in this article. It contains information of different sects of Shi'ite Islam. An irrelevant amount of article space is dedicated to religious views, disputed history and cases for and againt the legitimacy of successorship of the subjected individual.
A huge cleanup is in order, which I intend to do. However, editors must be careful that this mess doesn't repeat itself.
DistributorScientiae (talk) 17:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks I have provided some external sources for adding content. Hope you will be able to use them. --Sherenk1 (talk) 14:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Large amounts of unrelated content 

message: I have been removed some unwanted templates and unrelated content from article and rewrite article with huge citations. Removed tomb of Abadullah alwafi as it was unrelated with article and should be placed on related article. replaced infobox religion with infobox person for betterment, removed copyrighted template as i have solved the issue and rebuilt article. Thanks and regards --Syed Saqib Imad 22:51, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have rewrite article and removed unnecessary content and templates & Images 

message: Prior content in this  duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://simerg.com/literary-readings/the-ismailis-fom-the-earliest-times-to-the-fall-of-the-fatimid-empire/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Under "The Ismāʿīlī–Ithnaʿasheri schism," it reads "Isma'ili sources deny the death of Isma'il in the life of his father, Shia and Sunni Muslims don't deny it. Tree showing Ismaili Imam placed below." That Isma'ilis deny Ja'fars death is not in the given source, so such lump-sided sourced dichotomy in the article is not justified. The family tree referenced is also absent. Yasmamba (talk) 15:43, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text/source removal