Talk:Central Trains

message: :Image:Central trains logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now added. TerriersFan 22:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Central trains logo.gif

message: It's difficult to see where the Liverpool-Norwich service will fit in when the Central franchise is split up. "Cross Country" seems likeliest
but it's not mentioned as a candidate in this article. As a customer at the Liverpool end I would be glad to see it split at Nottingham but that has been ruled out, apparently.
Exile 21:24, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It will be part of the Stagecoach-run East Midlands Franchise.  --RFBailey 22:21, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Liverpool-Norwich

message: :Image:Central trains logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Central trains logo.gif

message: It could use a redirect Central trains.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.220.55.22 (talk) 19:31, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: A

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Central Trains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081203001247/http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1999/19991932.htm to http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1999/19991932.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Central Trains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070211171539/http://www.centraltrains.co.uk/templates/Page.aspx?id=462 to http://www.centraltrains.co.uk/templates/Page.aspx?id=462
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thejunction.org.uk/dmul.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1999/19991932.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/356.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070211180004/http://www.centraltrains.co.uk/templates/ctIndex.aspx?id=452 to http://www.centraltrains.co.uk/templates/ctIndex.aspx?id=452
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dft.gov.uk/press/speechesstatements/statements/railfranchisingarrangementso5945
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.norfolkrailwaysociety.org.uk/news_jul-aug06.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: @10mmsocket, hi just wanted to make sure that we're on the same page with your change the other day Your edit summary stated "Cite news - the "work=" or "newspaper=" ensures that the publisher is in itialics". I think you might have meant to say that the "work" is in italics; is that right? Dawnseeker2000 11:49, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, yes. So "publisher=xyz" and xyz is in regular type. "work=xyz" or "newspaper=xyz" and xyz is in italics. Sorry for the confusion in my comment. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, OK. So you're saying that the BBC is like a publishing company and BBC News and BBC Sport are their publications? Dawnseeker2000 11:10, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems right 10mmsocket (talk) 15:15, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It can totally seem right. I don't have an exact figure right now, but I scan the database frequently for these types of issues and have been using AWB to resolve them for over three years. I'm sure there are many thousands of instances of references listing BBC as publisher and BBC Sport/News as work, but where is the evidence that that is the relationship?It can't be found because it doesn't exist.Look no further than our own articles for BBC, BBC Sport, and BBC News. BBC is a broadcaster, and broadcasters are not italicized in the encyclopedia. BBC Sport/News are also broadcasters. They are shown as divisions of the BBC . And that reconciles nicely with how we present the title of BBC News and BBC Sport; not italicized.The publisher/work relationship is primarily about old media, with publishing companies with their newspapers or magazines. New media doesn't necessarily follow that scheme. Dawnseeker2000 12:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That's a great clarification, thank you. I will change my approach accordingly. 10mmsocket (talk) 14:17, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publisher and work