Talk:South Carolina in the American Civil War

message: The article, as is, contains no original research, is not cited with any verifiable sources and contains many loaded words. It should be entirely rewritten before the POV tag is removed, which is exactly what I plan on doing in the next few days. Hope you can contribute.
-John_C
Agreed completely, it is considerably biased.
- Anonymous  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.234.200.8 (talk) 14:21, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: In addition to the merger discussion above, there is also an active article for deletion discussion for Republic of South Carolina at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republic of South Carolina  Red Harvest (talk) 06:58, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I made comments there concerning dual AFD and merge requests on-going at the same time. Otr500 (talk) 14:54, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Republic of South Carolina" article for deletion discussion 

message: There are several problems with addition of this infobox.  The most serious is that it is unsourced original research.  There was a whole series of these articles with infoboxes.  The articles have been deleted and/or merged/redirected after discussions on each page since they consisted of speculative original research rather than reliable secondary sources.  (The AfD for this one can be found at .)  The infoboxes were full of original research, were unneeded, and in some way duplications., As such the "Republic of" infoboxes are not helpful to the reader.  But now we get to play whack-a-mole as people keep trying to insert their favorite eye candy from articles that never should have been created in the first place.  Time for a bigger hammer. Red Harvest (talk) 04:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll confess I was pointed toward this issue by Red Harvest, as that user and myself had been part of the deletion and merge discussions surrounding these subjects. So this may sound like canvassing, but I don't consider it so. On the merits, this infobox is excessive detail, IMHO, and the republic it represents doesn't garner significant enough coverage to warrant its own infobox. BusterD (talk) 20:04, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Republic of" infobox 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on South Carolina in the American Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.civil-war.net/pages/1860_census.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A2006.05.0178%3Aarticle%3Dpos%3D47
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.civilwar.org/education/history/civil-war-overview/why-non-slaveholding.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:53, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Rather a startling jump from 'Fort Sumter' to 'The War Ends'. How can any article about South Carolina in the Civil War leave out the Fort Wagner engagement? Valetude (talk) 14:21, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: PS Have copied-down part of the Wiki page on Fort Wagner. But the article still needs improving. Valetude (talk) 11:35, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fort Wagner? 

message: I think we should add the Gold Palmetto tree flag hat was in use for 2 days   by the south carolina legislature on Jan 26-Jan28 before the legislature would change it to the one we use now or the one being used on the website.         
https://www.britannica.com/topic/flag-of-South-Carolina   Website where i fund the flag info Raketelli (talk) 17:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The flag  

message: On January 26 1861 the sc legislature  would make SC gold with a gold palmetto tree   before changing it 2 days later to the SC flag  we all know and love today so i was wondering if we would put bellow the flag the gold palmetto tree flag. This would make 2 flags on the article. 
https://www.britannica.com/topic/flag-of-South-Carolina proof of gold palmetto flag that was used for 2 days.
Raketelli (talk) 18:58, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: i accidentally made 2 things about this i thought the old one didn't post. Raketelli (talk) 18:59, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  SC gold palmetto flag