lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Diversity jurisdiction

message: Class actions, complete diversity. Amcfreely 20:01, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is new rule handed down by SCOTUS this year
http://www.scotuswiki.com/index.php?title=Hertz_Corporation_v._Friend
This article contains no sources for its material. The material appears to be correct, but that excuse the need for reliable sourcing. SMP0328. (talk) 02:18, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourcing 

message: the page states that diversity jursidiction requires $75,000. this is correct AFAIK. However, when talking about the "legal certainty" test the page starts talking about $250,000.  I'm pretty sure that's a mistake and the writer meant $75,000 all along.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.68.243.9 (talk) 15:19, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been heavily vandalized recently.  Thanks for pointing that out.--Coolcaesar (talk) 10:01, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrepancy in amount in controversy section 

message: For the purposes of the heading, anyway. C'mon. Please. Lockesdonkey (talk) 04:25, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who thought that diversity isn't subject-matter? 

message: I think it would help if the article made it explicit that, if federal question jurisdiction is satisfied, diversity of jurisdiction is not an issue.  For example, you can sue your employer (assume the company is incorporated in your state) in federal court for violations of federal employment law, the ADA, etc.  In other words, diversity jurisdiction is only relevant when you're suing under state law.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:9000:AC18:5600:B0EC:7982:86B1:3E96 (talk) 16:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not a practice guide. The more appropriate location for that information would be the article on subject-matter jurisdiction. --Coolcaesar (talk) 22:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helpful clarification 

message: "A U.S. citizen who is domiciled outside the U.S. is not considered to be a citizen of any U.S. state, and cannot be considered an alien. The presence of such a person as a party completely destroys diversity jurisdiction, except for a class action or mass action in which minimal diversity exists with respect to other parties in the case."
"... completely destroys" would be better worded in common parlance.The current version is uninterpretable by a lay reader.
S C Cheese (talk) 10:42, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording related to overseas residence
Talk:Laclede's Landing, St. Louis

message: I will get back to this with a list of attractions....
Storm63640 19:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the list enough, or should a small section of information be given for all of the businesses? Yawetag 09:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information on places? 

message: I've never been west of Framingham, Massachusetts so I can only infer based on pictures, but it appears that this street is paved not with cobblestones but with Belgian blocks.  If someone in the know could verify that this is true, might I suggest correcting the article?  76.19.26.248 (talk) 02:08, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cobblestones vs Belgian blocks.
Talk:Pratt & Whitney Canada

message: I think something about Pratt & Whitney Canada's US fine for selling technology to China.  http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/pratt-whitney-canada-pleads-guilty-in-military-software-case/article4377357/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattclare (talk • contribs) 01:14, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Fine

message: I think that this defining moment in the company history should not be ignored, it literally made PWC into the fantastic company it is today. This article as it is, is barely a product list.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.212.9.246 (talk) 07:22, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: 1974 United Aircraft strike

message: I have moved the section "Next Generation Regional Turboprop" from Pratt & Whitney Canada PW100, because this is a new family of engines, not part of the PW100 family.
However, it's my opinion that this warrants at most a single sentence, because this engine does not yet exist. It is still in the design stage. I was going to suggest taking it out entirely, but there does seem to be enough coverage in reliable sources to indicate notability. Kendall-K1 (talk) 16:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It still needs to be a single sentence, but we can keep all the refs. I'd recommend a draft article for the details. BilCat (talk) 08:54, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next Generation Regional Turboprop
Talk:Carlos Meglia

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a license compatible with GFDL. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:43, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:MidAmerica St. Louis Airport

message: Should this article be merged with Scott Air Force Base? The infoboxes are identical, and the FAA refers to them both as BLV. I'm not sure which name should be used, but Scott AFB came first and makes up most of the flights from the facility. CFB Bagotville as an example of a dual use airport article. --Dual Freq 18:50, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Missouri Botanical Garden

message: I added this here, because - The Garden is a center for botanical research and science education of international repute, as well as an oasis in the city of St. Louis, with 79 acres (31 hectares) of horticultural display. It will be unfair to attribute the discovery of this rarest plant just to a mere scientist of this Garden. So, this Garden is the real reason for the discovery: On May, 2008, St. Louis botanist George Yatskievych and a colleague, with the Missouri Botanical Garden, rediscovered and identified (in Sierra Madre del Sur, a pine oak forest in Mexico's mountains) a rare odd, orange-brown, fleshy-stemmed parasitic plant, first found in 1985 by Wayt Thomas, New York Botanical Garden scientist. A type of Orobanchaceae, the pine cone-shaped dense cluster of flowers and juicy celery-like stalks plant will have the formal Latin name for the "little hermit of Mexico," both a new species and a new genus because "it is so unusual and distinct that it cannot be included in any of the existing genera in the plant family Orobanchaceae". There are echoes in this plant’s lifestyle of species such as Orthilia secunda, which steals its goodness from funghi. mobot.org,  ParasiticPlantRediscovery blogs.nature.com, Parasitic hermit plant found in Mexico - May 01, 2008  news.yahoo.com,   Scientist rediscovers rare plant unseen since 1985ap.google.com, Scientist rediscovers rare plant unseen since 1985 --Florentino floro (talk) 06:48, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rare discovery by the Garden since 1985

message: Per the suggestion of the Garden's Web Editor, I am going to delete "From 1991 to 1993...George H.W. Bush)."  The Garden wishes to remain as apolitical as possible and this piece of information seems out of place.
I am also proposing to delete "The 2003 annual report...with PhDs" for reasons along the same lines.  It just seems out of place.
Also, I propose to make changes regarding the Garden's president.  Dr. Raven has recently retired; his position is being filled by Dr. Peter Wyse Jackson. http://www.mobot.org/press/Assets/FP/pwj.asp
Mbgcommunications (talk) 20:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  General Editing/Housekeeping 
Talk:Terry Moore (cartoonist)

message: I can provide a link to articles that support all of the statementz in the "themes" section.  But I don't know how to insert them into the citations needed location.
http://www.tcj.com/276/i_tmoore.html
and
http://www.afterellen.com/Print/2007/4/terrymoore
Support each of the four statements in the themes section.  Can someone put the proper coding in to get the citations in place?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djcbuffum (talk • contribs) 22:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source material 
Talk:Tony Millionaire

message: I'm having trouble confirming the timeframe, but I think the strip switched to the Voice in 2003 (not in "1999 or 2000," when Russ Smith still owned the Press). I'm guessing it wasn't the editorial changeover per se; he was probably pissed over them shrinking the size of the strips, and for paying next to nothing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.59.24.40 (talk) 00:41, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York Press 

message: : Hi! You don't need to read the rest of this, because I verified that the edits were correct! I verified edits both in wikitext and by opening the dead links and archived links for both changes: the two dead links only open 404 errors and the Wayback Machine archives open two interesting interviews. 
: Thanks! Geekdiva (talk) 09:13, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified
Talk:Riverfront Times

message: Is it just me, or is this article sounding like much of it was cribbed from Riverfront Times promotional material?  (from 132.192.91.92)
: Yes, it certainly looks that way.  Much of the text is in the first person refering to 'our readership' and things like that, and also has the tone of a marketing brocure for the RFT.  Someone more knowledgable of the history and such of the RFT should probably rewrite this completely.  Meanwhile, I'm marking it with an avert template so it will be flagged as needing cleanup. kenj0418 18:31, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Advert
Talk:St. Louis Symphony Orchestra

message: If the name of the city is St. Louis, why is the name of the orchestra "Saint Louis Symphony Orchestra", and not "St. Louis Symphony Orchestra".  Unless it's named directly after St Louis IX of France or some other saint named Louis, rather than after the city.  --  JackofOz (talk) 03:40, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I see they changed their name in 2010 from "Saint Louis Symphony Orchestra" to "St. Louis Symphony".  I'd like to think my question above had something to do with this embracing of consistency.  I will go to my grave believing this.  :)  --  Jack of Oz [your turn] 19:16, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Their website is now headed "SLSO" and under "Contact Us", it uses "St. Louis Symphony Orchestra". User:RossweisseSTL made some related changes today. Should the article be moved to St. Louis Symphony Orchestra? IMO, it's hardly worth the trouble. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:51, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: St vs. Saint
Talk:Saint Louis University

message: The section on the law school sounds like it's lifted from a press release.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.132.124.22 (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Does it sound better now? Corkythehornetfan(talk) 22:31, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This is still an issue. I cut the sections on housing because it reads like a student handbook and has little encyclopedic significance. All of the sourcing was to slu.edu. --Melchior2006 (talk) 06:27, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV issues
Talk:Washington Avenue Historic District (St. Louis, Missouri)

message: I changed the western boundary info to 18th St. rather than Jefferson.  There aren't any loft-style buildings past a single one on the south-west corner of 18th and Washington, just like the Historical Registry reference states.  The neighborhood has a pretty drastic change after 18th St.  --Micah Hainline (talk) 01:17, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Western boundary
Talk:Saint Louis Zoo

message: If the zoo is participating in research or educational programs, it would be great to add this information to the article, too.  Rklawton 13:12, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Research

message: I've removed this from the article.  Can we find some independent sourcing?  One link is 404ed.  Regards, M-ercury at 02:54, January 5, 2008 02:54, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sourcing 

message: What is the gauge of the St. Louis Zoo's railway?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.223.82.114 (talk) 21:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rail gauge 

message: The picture of Edith does not say where the picture was taken and I very strongly suspect it is not of Edith while she was at the Zoo.  If that's the case, either that should be made clear, or the photo should be deleted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Enigma foundry (talk • contribs) 02:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: OK.  Rklawton (talk) 03:12, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edith Picture
Talk:Joseph Smith

message: In the open the wording is, “ Several religious denominations identify as the continuation of the church that he organized, including the LDS Church and the Community of Christ.”
 I am not aware of any organization officially identifying as LDS Church. I know many Latter-day Saints who are members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but if you are identifying official names then the official name is shown incorrectly.  
For brevity I could see’The Church of Jesus Christ (LDS)’ after first use. Or short form ‘the Church’. But first use should show official name. Also, it may sound awkward, but it makes sense to me to remove ‘the’ before Community of Christ to avoid confusion around its official name. 2001:56A:F73F:4500:7D48:3302:EEE9:780D (talk) 03:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The wording identified is at the end of the 4th paragraph in the lede....the full name and then establishment of the short name for the LDS Church is already done in the opening paragraph of the article. ChristensenMJ (talk) 03:37, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  LDS Church 

message: The statement in quotes below is not accurate there is no LDS Church, and members of the church have always referred to one another as Saints. They did for a period of time accept being called Mormons, but it was derogatory and often used to imply the members were not Christian, or that they were non member sympathizers of the church in general.
 
"Mormons generally regard Smith as a prophet comparable to Moses and Elijah. Several religious denominations identify as the continuation of the church that he organized, including the LDS Church and the Community of Christ."
It should read
"Saints generally regard Smith as a prophet comparable to Moses and Elijah. Several religious denominations identify as the continuation of the church that he organized, including the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints commonly referred to as the LDS Church, and the Community of Christ." Jason Wasden (talk) 22:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: When you're writing for a global audience (as we are), a saint is typically understood to be a dead person who has been canonized. In that light, it's unlikely that "Saints generally regard Smith" at all. Also, see MOS:LDS. ~Awilley (talk) 01:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. User:CanonNi (talk|contribs) 01:47, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 15 April 2024
Talk:Online Bomberman

message: The semi-legal international server of Online Bomberman was known as BMOworld. The server was operational for quite a long time, though they started forcing people to complete an "offer" (which was often a scam ad) as they couldn't get the cash in any other way.
Recently, BMOworld changed to advertising a copy of Balanced Worlds' "Bomb Buddies" (which isn't a derivative of Online Bomberman).
:This one seems to be offline too, so I wonder if that game works at all currently. - Flexman (talk) 07:51, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-legal international server? [[User:Yura87|Yura87]] ([[User talk:Yura87|talk]]) 19:08, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six: Rogue Spear

message: One Stand-alone Add-On is missing: Rainbow Six: Covert Ops. Maybe someone os so kind to write something about it. --ChrisJG 11:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, looks like someone added it some time in the last seventeen years since you wrote this. Nice catch, though! 2600:1010:B1A9:7AD0:8833:25FF:FEE0:E37E (talk) 05:19, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incomplete Add-On list 

message: The weapons weren't lost, seized, or stolen, exactly. They were independently manufactured. That's what it says elsewhere in the text. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.4.90.4 (talk) 23:36, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PINNACLE - EMPTY QUIVER 

message: Has anyone noticed that the US release date given in the opening paragraph is 22 September 1999, while the release date in the info box is 31 August 1999?
--ExarPalantas (talk) 16:48, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date 

message: I just reverted yet another anonymous IP address whose only edits were to add in spam links to Voobly. .  There are constant efforts for this site to slip in spam to other game sites, such as the Age of Kings, and Microsoft Ants.  Dozens of reverts from different editors have been necessary over the past months this has been going on.  Please watch out for it happening here, they usually trying again, after a few weeks, and sometimes skipping a month or so.  Dream Focus 06:39, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warning, this article is now on the list of spam targets 

message: Initially this was about me finding no sources to support this, but I managed to find this covering the addon "Black Thorn" being postponed due to the September 11 attacks. If it was the main game, this would surely be notable, but this being an addon that's only covered in passing in the main game's article, I don't really think it's that notable to mention it; it runs into WP:NOT's territory. Here's the version I arrived to before coming to the above realization: "The title was initially postponed due to the September 11 attacks". Eik Corell (talk) 17:18, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: They also changed the mission "Operation Blunt Scroll" to a bus station instead of an airport terminal. LuckyLopp (talk) 03:11, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: A mission being removed because of 9/11

message: I'm wondering if we should include mention of the Black Ops fan-made compilation pack that was released, maybe under a "Legacy" section. LuckyLopp (talk) 02:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of Black Ops?
Talk:Six Flags St. Louis

message: Is it really that important to say that the park is sometimes abbreviated sfstl?
How many people truly  even do that? Johnnywalterboy (talk) 16:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initialized...? 

message: The result was: Merge, by silent consensus. --B. Wolterding 16:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposed (The Sky-Way Six Flags St. Louis) 

message: This page doesn't follow the normal format for Wiki pages or the formats used by the pages for Six Flags Over Texas or Six Flags over Georgia. They should match. Listing areas and rides doesn't provide any useful information.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by GregE625 (talk • contribs) 01:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should match other Six Flags pages 

message: What does everybody think about just deleting this article and starting over? Listing the attractions does no good.--Astros4477 (talk) 02:48, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no reason for it to be deleted. Yes the article is basically a series of tables, but that doesn't stop you from expanding and improving it. Themeparkgc  Talk  07:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Bomberman Max 2

message: In Mega Bomberman, before being named in Bomberman series, Max was just a combo of "black" (player 2) and one of the skins. That was also the game to establish bomber-female, bomber-child and fat bomber.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.34.166.33 (talk) 22:55, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Max's Origins 
Talk:Solutia

message: This needs to be updated, specifically for corporate info and Solutia's bankruptcy. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 130.127.74.88 (talk) 07:46, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs an update 

message: Recent lay offs may be worth mentioning http://pnj.com/article/20081122/NEWS01/811220315
70.251.124.138 (talk) 19:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lay offs 

message: Eastman purchased Solutia in 2012...might be time to update this page! http://www.eastman.com/Company/News_Center/2012/Pages/Eastman_to_Acquire_Solutia_Raises_Outlook_for_2013_EPS_to_Greater_Than_6_Dollars.aspx 208.102.203.215 (talk) 13:38, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acquired 

message: Solutia has been bought by Eastman. The page needs an update to reflect the change.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.246.157.131 (talk) 09:01, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acquisition of Eastman 
Talk:Soulard, St. Louis

message: Please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject St. Louis/articles to find out how to improve this page.  DaronDierkes (talk) 02:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Do List 

message: I hope I'm adding this post to the right place. If not, please let me know. As a resident of Soulard, I'd like to contribute to this article by adding a varity of photos and brief descriptions of Soulard places such as historic houses, parks, churches, etc. The idea is to help the non-Soulard residences realize that Soulard is a community where people live, work, shop, eat, and not just a place to go "party" and get drunk. While I certainly love our Mardi Gras herritage, there is so much more to Soulard for people to experience. So, is it OK to add a little to this article and hopefully branch out with sub-articles? (Soulardguys (talk) 20:22, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Photos of Soulard 

message: This is not in soulard.  The lemp mansion is nearby but outside of the neighborhood, so I'm removing it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.166.252.239 (talk) 18:10, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Lemp Mansion
Talk:Miracles (1989 film)

message: The presence of Jackie Chan, Anita Mui and other popular Hong Kong stars, the superior production values, and the fact that Chan cites this as his best film should rate an upgrade. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jgreenbook (talk • contribs) 18:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgrade to mid-importance 

message: Please someone confirm whether "The Bad Sleep Well" was actually an influence for "Miracles" as included in the Production section of this article. But never allow the edit claiming that the former (instead of Frank Capra's "Lady for a Day" and "Pocketful of Miracles") was based on "Madame La Gimp", nor the statement about that Akira Kurosawa film having the same plot as this Jackie Chan film. 143.44.196.196 (talk) 07:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Upon further research, the claim that "The Bad Sleep Well" influenced Jackie to make a film about the 1930s makes no sense given that the former is set after World War II. ShiranuiAensland (talk) 06:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bad Sleep Well?