lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Meadow Brook Hall

message: There's discussion here of an apparent "no photography" policy at the hall, which somone might want to incude in the article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:42, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmmm.  Your link lead me to this "Were you at the celebration? Share your photos here!". Carptrash (talk) 19:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No photography 

message: Starting a discussion here, since the current sourcing and the information about the size of the hall have been put in question. Note that I have no opinion or personal knowledge regarding how large the place is - it just needs to be reliably sourced!
The sentence that's under discussion is "Covering 88,000 square feet (8,200 m2) and with 110 rooms, the mansion is the fourth largest historic house museum in the United States." The source that has been questioned is this article at mlive.com; another source has since been added, the webpage of the hall itself.  The latter source is primary, and when information is called into question, we do need a secondary source. The problem with the mlive source is that it reads as if it is closely based on the website - I suspect that the research carried out for the article may have consisted of reading what the hall has to say about itself. Unfortunately, using Google Maps and its "measurement tool" as a source as suggested here and in other edits by the same user to show a smaller area is clearly original research, and that is even less acceptable. If this is an important historic building, I assume that it's been described in some kind of register that's independent of the building itself, and that would be a good source. --bonadea contributions talk 11:13, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just added a secondary source to confirm the square footage, if that's useful. Donutron (talk) 11:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions about sourcing and size 

message: Text and references copied from to Meadow Brook Hall to William Edward Kapp   See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 10:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Text and references copied from William Edward Kapp and Meadow Brook Hall to Detroit Historical Society,  See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 11:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Text and references copied from William Kapp and Meadow Brook Hall to Temple Israel (West Bloomfield, Michigan),  See former article's history for a list of contributors.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:05, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Text and references copied from William Kapp and Meadow Brook Hall to Flint Journal Building,  See former article's history for a list of contributors.  7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:12, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution
Talk:Bartholomew Teeling

message: Colonel, Captain, Commodore? anyone know for sure?--Vintagekits 20:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What rank 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Penny Dreadful Players

message: A quick summary of the sources given in Penny Dreadful Players:
Six links all using the same web publishing software, all apparently student magazines afilliated with Illini Media that link one another:
*Interview with Playwright, Jim Trapp -- uses College Publisher software
*Review of "Cigarettes and Purple Pills", a play written by PDP member Steve Stetak -- uses College Publisher software
*March 2007 article on production of Catholic Schoolgirls -- uses College Publisher software
*August 2004 article on student written Master and Margarita -- uses College Publisher software
* http://www.illinimedia.com/di/archives/1997/March/003/p01_penny.txt.html 1997 Daily Illini article -- student publication, College Publisher software, see above
* http://media.www.readbuzz.com/media/storage/paper755/news/2007/01/25/ArtsEntertainment/Take-Center.Stage.In.The.Cu-2677229.shtml -- student publication, College Publisher software, see above
Others:
*Radio interview with former Managing Director Theresa Winters - probably covered by "works where the company, corporation, organization, or group talks about itself"
* University of Illinois: Office Of Registered Organizations -- presence in a directory is not enough to confer notability
* PDP's 2002 website -- self-published
* PDP's current website -- self-published
* "Mad Scientists in Love" on Baker's Plays -- presence in advertising is not enough to confer notability, or we would need to have an entry on the author of every published work, ever
* http://www.bl.uk/collections/early/victorian/pu_penny.html -- irrelevant to notability, not about article subject
* http://www.navinprasad.com/pdp/mission.html -- self-published
-- The Anome 17:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cathedral of the Most Blessed Sacrament

message: Prior to this being named the cathedral church, what was the name of church?  Was it simply "Most Blessed Sacrament Church" or something else entirely?  It's not unusual for a an old parish to be given an entire new name upon becoming a cathedral. --Criticalthinker (talk) 03:03, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Original Name

message: I don't want to fiddle with the page, but I attended both Detroit Cathedral high school and the University of Detroit, and I would never have called the cathedral "near" the school, or vice-versa.  It's four miles. The inclusion of the college is not of much value.  --- OtherDave (talk) 17:35, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Near U of Detroit? 

message: When I click on the architect George Diehl, I get redirected to another George Diehl (1918-1986), who was a major league ballplayer. Can you clarify?
Musicwriter (talk) 03:07, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architecture 
Talk:Allied Bank of Pakistan

message: I redirected to "Allied Bank Limited" to the proper article with official name of the bank, as opposed the fictitious "Allied Bank of Pakistan" —Sohailstyle 00:52, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection
Talk:The Fillmore Detroit

message: I have seen nothing that says Chuck Forbes sold the building to live nation, I was under the impression that they merely operate it. Am i wrong? Scottr76 23:13, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ownership 

message: It was called Clubland in the early 1990s. Rainbirdbrain (talk) 03:46, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names
Talk:Grand Circus Park Historic District

message: Doesn't anyone else feel that the last part of the last paragraph is grossly misleading, if not very untrue?  Skyscraper graveyard?  How absurd.  I'm not going to delete this today.  But I'd encourage the person who wrote that and referenced the writing of another nobody to revisit this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mp2dtw (talk • contribs) 02:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Maccabees Building

message: I replaced the previous picture on the article (left) with a new one (right) which was on the Wayne State page.  The latter seemed like a better representation since the bottom 2/3 of the building wasn't lopped off.
Andrew Jameson (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: The article says this is a Neo-gothic style building.  Is there a citation for this?  The round arch windows on the first, tenth and fourteenth floors and the rose windows on the first floor would suggest that it's Romanesque revival.Goldnpuppy (talk) 03:48, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architectural style 

message: I'm not suggesting we add this photo to the article, as I don't know the ownership of it, but if you're interested in this building, this photo of Detroit was taken from an upper floor of the Maccabees Building in 1942:  Moncrief (talk) 19:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo taken from the building in 1942

message: In the article's introductory section, it states that "from 1960 to 2000, it served as the headquarters of Detroit Public Schools."  But in the History section, it states that the DPS was there only from 1960 to 1992.  Which is correct? Fultie771 (talk) 02:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date for the DPS headquarters? 

message: Exterior carving was completed by noted sculptor Corrado Parducci.
:First of all, Parducci did not carve anything except a few wooden pieces of his own and secondly the reference link is dead, and thirdly, it is suspect on this point in any case. 
 
Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I cut this out and moved it here
Talk:Lafayette Park, Detroit

message: There really should be a map of Detroit here to show its specific location.  The maps of Michigan and the USA aren't particularly useful when we're talking about a specific city neighborhood. Funnyhat (talk) 21:33, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map of Detroit 
Talk:Principle of Binominal Nomenclature

message: I examined the content of this separate page on Binominal nomenclature very carefully alongside the content of the much longer page Binomial nomenclature, and it was clear that the only differences were 
#the additional n in the spelling
#the preference of some zoologists (allegedly, judging by remarks in the page) for the Binominal spelling. 
For all ordinary visitors, and for the academic world at large, there is no difference between these terms except the above, and really both are trivial. Ther is a lot to say about the system; it was all said very well on the other page; and it made no sense to expand this page by saying it all twice.
All the English dictionaries I have in printed form (including many large recent editions) and the online ones I've seen treat both spellings as perfectly synonymous in biological taxonomy contexts, and there was no real scientific, semantic, linguistic, or even cultural reason to have a separate page of coverage here. 
I have revised, expanded and clarified the Binomial... page to reflect the sensitivities of any zoologists who object to omission of the -n- and trust that nobody out there is going to destroy these efforts by reverting or vandalism! Iph 18:05, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It might have been better to discuss this beforehand.  My concern is you don't mention discussing the codes for usages.  KP Botany 18:31, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes.  KP Botany 18:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

message: This page says nothing that isn't in Binomial nomenclature; has almost no links to it; isn't referenced. So I've made it a redirect to Binomial nomenclature. Peter coxhead (talk) 00:01, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My reversion was later undone, without any explanation here. I left the page alone, hoping that it might be added to and so justified. It remains almost word-for-word identical to International  Code of Zoological Nomenclature#Principle of Binominal Nomenclature. What is the point of a separate article which simply reproduces a section of a longer and better-referenced article? So I am going to repeat my former edit. Peter coxhead (talk) 20:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made redirect
Talk:Roe I Triplane

message: I note the first image on the page is of a different aeroplane to the other two & not the Roe I Triplane.
It appears to be an Avro MkIV as shown here: http://www.pbase.com/image/37904058  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oddbodkin (talk • contribs) 21:58, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong image.
Talk:In vitro

message: References need to be developed for this page.
The differences between in vitro, in vivo and ex vivo are need to be clearly mentioned.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.215.226.152 (talk) 13:55, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: After a quick search of "meat", looks like there isn't any mention of cultured meat anywhere on this article, or even the word "meat". I think I may need to add a mention of this by integrating in the In vitro article. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 05:21, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't seem to find a way to incorporate "in vitro meat" into this article. Does adding something like an "applications" section help? Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 05:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absence of "in vitro meat"
Talk:M31 motorway

message: I know that the answer to this is, in some ways, obvious. (If you know the area, you'll realise that the entire route is through forest or heathland -- not wise politically!) However, the article does not mention this, nor when the decision was taken to shelve the plans.
(This was spotted in passing -- please don't give me a  as I already have more than enough to do here!)
EdJogg (talk) 13:17, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why wasn't it built? 
Talk:List of jazz genres

message: There is a missing aspect about kinds of jazz.
There is an amalgamation of soft rock and easy jazz called "New Wave" music.
New wave music is often very emotional in presentation, and began in the
early 1970s and continued into the 1990s.  KTWV radio had CDs made of the
top ten best New Wave music of the year for each year during the 1980s.
I cannot remember my favorites, but Bernward Koch and his Dancing Atoms
album was really exciting New Wave to me.  There were so many others, too,
but I have moved from southern California in 1999 so I am out of the link.
Libris Fidelis
librisfidelis at librisfidelis dot us  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.175.216.85 (talk) 16:56, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Jazz Genre 

message: The header at the top of the page says that there are no citations, but there doesn't need to be any. This is just a list of other wiki pages and then some token facts taken from them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Superdupercranman (talk • contribs) 14:40, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No citations 

message: Would you say that modal jazz began in the 1950s? Luke Davis (talk) 10:27, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modal Jazz 

message: is lacking the Brazilian musical genre played by Cesar Camargo Mariano. Examples: Sambalanço Trio, Fogueira Três, Zimbo Trio, Tamba Trio, Os Bossa Três etc.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.94.252.18 (talk) 06:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sambalanço, Bossa jazz, Samba jazz 

message: This list could stand som clean-up.  Some geners are missing (e.g. manouche); others are just alternate names or descriptions of genrea already listed (e.g. "Hot jazz", "Gypsy Jazz", and "Manouche" are different names for the same thing.  
Some listings are questionable (e.g. "Ragtime").  IF you ask most ragtime experts and afficianados they will tell you -- most emphatically -- that ragtime is NOT jazz.  There are some commonalities between the genres, just as there are commonalities between classical and romantic music, but one is not a "genre" or "sub-genre" of the other.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 22:30, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs cleanup 

message: Several times recently there has been alternating addition and removal of line entries for Dark jazz/Doomjazz, Ethio jazz, Hot club and Punk jazz, which do not have corresponding articles. Instead of this to-and-fro, I am creating this Talk page topic where any argument for their inclusion can be put forward. AllyD (talk) 11:47, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, I am not sure if anyone acknowledged this. This will prove vital in the continual efforts to clean-up this reference page.  Johndvandevert (talk) 12:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate inclusion 

message: I think..... Yes or no 2A02:A45D:5A36:1:6877:2855:32CE:9FA4 (talk) 21:43, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is jazz jazz?
Talk:Mouthcard, Kentucky

message: This is very unencyclopediac. It looks like a review posted on rateitall.com and not an encyclopedia article.
I live in Mouthcard. There are no gas stations. There once were, but they have closed.75.109.128.33 (talk) 18:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requires tons of cleanup.
Talk:Orpheum Theatre (Minneapolis)

message: Where does it say to avoid providing the location of a place in the WP:Style guide? I'm not familiar with that guideline.--Appraiser (talk) 16:52, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: address

message: "The building opened on October 16, 1921...."  Huh?  Per my grandmother's diary, she attended shows at the Orpheum Theater in Minneapolis in 1911 and 1912.
The article should mention the earlier building on 25 South Seventh Street, or at least disambiguate from it.
--Scribe2u (talk) 07:32, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: =
Talk:Newport Pagnell services

message: "Newport Pagnell services were the first service station to be opened in the UK. It opened in 1960."
I strongly suggest someone researches this.
94.193.255.112 (talk) 19:46, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening Date
Talk:Ohio State Fair

message: ==
This article is really bad. It has a little history, then devolves into a date-based punch list. Nowhere is the modern fair, its purpose or description offered. I am going to rewrite it from scratch. george 18:21, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Breakaway (Space: 1999)

message: I've heard that Satton wanted to much money to reprise his role.  Which is correct? Douglasnicol 18:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does the reference satisy you? Douglasnicol 17:31, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lon Satton

message: "Scientific Errors"?  Folks, this is Space: 1999.  What possible use is a "scientific errors" section?  It's like having a "theological errors" section for Buffy the Vampire Slayer.  The entire show is nonsense from a scientific point of view.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanWillard (talk • contribs) 10:29, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Space:1999 gets much ridicule for its 'errors', though other sci-fi shows are just as guilty, it doesn't seem right to single out one show. Douglasnicol (talk) 18:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed that section and pasted it below. It's unreferenced and not notable. --Duncan (talk) 13:28, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Scientific Errors" 

message: The plot summary is over 2,000 words long, which is absurd.  See WP:TVPLOT.  64.124.27.3 (talk) 02:53, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary
Talk:List of jazz drummers

message: Many of the entries on the List of American jazz drummers page are not present on this page. North America1000 23:11, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entries 

message: Where's Allison Miller? 2601:600:8680:6360:A197:D88F:E2AB:D4FA (talk) 21:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jazz Drummers
Talk:Kuchiki taoshi

message: PLEASE CHANGE THE NAME OF THIS ARTICLE TO "kuchiki taoshi"............... 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kuchiki-taoshi#Single_leg_takedown     <------ that article is supposed to have a link to this page!!! someone fix it please!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.34.37 (talk) 04:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Vandalic War

message: As Hughes points out Belisarius hadn’t really proven himself to be among Justinian’s “most talented generals”, he distinguished himself in Persia by losing almost all the battles the fought there and was subsequently charged with incompetence which almost cost him his entire career. I don’t think that this can be justified by a reference to a Bury or some other source that’s older than Hughes’ book as Hughes makes a pretty compelling argument against this and and against the older sources. A newer sources which disputes this could be added, I removed the “dubious” template because I think it didn’t quite warrant that. Still I think that Hughes’ argument is quite strong and that the fact that the nearest reference is to Hughes, who agues the exact opposite, not that Belisarius was incompetent but that his overall performance up to that point had been quite poor. I would personally advise removing this part, stating that Belisarius is one of Justinian’s best generals doesn’t seem to me to paint an exactly neutral picture either. Dorromikhal (talk) 17:16, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justinian selected one of his most trusted and talented generals, Belisarius? 

message: Hats off to the editors. As of now, this is easily one of the best articles on the site. 188.197.17.185 (talk) 11:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overall article quality
Talk:M12 motorway (Great Britain)

message: I think a better route would be from Brentwood to Ipswich going through Chemlsford, Witham and Colchester.
Starting at M25 Junction 28 and ending at the A12 - A14 (M14) junction.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.64.45 (talk) 09:06, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A better route
Talk:List of jazz venues

message: Having just gone through and tidied things up a bit, I am wondering about the scope of this list.  As a contributor to the 2nd AfD discussion warned, this list could, and has, turned into a big red link farm.  Part of me thinks this should be pared down to actual working blue links; another part says that (sadly) there aren't that many jazz venues these days, and the list might never become unmanageably large.  But more than this, I feel that the entries in this list should be notable, by which I mean the venue is mentioned in reliable sources (beyond the venue's own website, or a mention in the local paper).  The All Music Guide to Jazz (or at least, the first edition) has a list of notable/historic jazz venues – this could be one such source supporting the inclusion of a particular venue in this list. My $0.02, -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 17:11, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: * I've gone through and cleaned up the list, based on this discussion and (perhaps more importantly) WP:Source list and WP:WTAF.  I've only retained list entries that either have an actual article, or that have a third-party source. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 02:58, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope of this list 

message: I've moved this article from List of jazz clubs to List of jazz venues as the latter is more inclusive (e.g. Carnegie Hall would more comfortably sit in a list of venues than in clubs). I suppose this might also include festivals, though we already have a separate List of jazz festivals. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 15:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: I have split the United States section to its own list, List of jazz venues in the United States. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 19:55, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page split 
Talk:M64 motorway

message: Quite a number of sources regard the M6 Toll as a failure, which hasn't really had an appreciable effect on congestion of the M6 north of Birmingham, due to people refusing to use it due as a result of the high toll charges.  SheffGruff (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  M6 Toll congestion
Talk:M9 motorway (Scotland)

message: Is there any info on when the various sections opened? Crookesmoor (talk) 08:47, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening dates
Talk:M90 motorway

message: This statement has no fact to back it up: "The M90 also has the tightest corner on the UK motorway network, for which traffic is forced to slow."
The corner is tighter than the design standards hence why it is signed with "chevrons" and "bend" signs, however it can be easily taken at 70mph and I have seen cars regularly take the corner at 90mph - I appreciate this information has no factual base however.
Is it definitely the tightest corner on the network?  There are 2 tight corners on the M80 Stepps bypass, one is near the temporary terminus at J3 and the other where it passes under the railway bridge between J1 and J2.  Both are subject to a 50mph limit and the forces feel far greater at 50mph than the M90 corner at 70mph.161.12.7.4 10:11, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled