lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:OKC-3S bayonet

message: OKC-3S is the model number applied in-house by Ontario Knife Company to this bayonet for the U. S. Rifles, Cal. 5.56mm, M16/A1/A2/A3/A4, consistent with OKC's inventorying practice; as I understand things, however, the Armed Forces officially refer to the OKC-3S by a name consistent with current United States Army practice:  the U. S. Bayonet M10 (in sequence after the U. S. Bayonet M9, still U. S. Army official issue as of December 2008, developed at Qual-A-Tec, initially manufactured by Buck Knives, and now competitively manufactured among OKC and Camillus Cutlery; and ahead of the M9-based U. S. Knife, EOD, M11), even though the M10 is a U.S.M.C. weapons project evolved from the Knife Mk 2 Mod 1 (originally developed with Ka-Bar and likewise secondary-contracted to OKC and Camillus).  However, due to Website reconstruction at both Army.mil and USMC.mil, the links to confirm this estimate are wanting.  Has anyone an archived link here, or results from a new search?  (This name "Bayonet M10" is also used on several eBay Items-For-Sale postings as of 08:34, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Māori mythology

message: the various deities need to get sorted by Māori goddess (a sub-cat. of Māori deity) or Māori god (also a sub-cat. of Māori deity). please?***Ria777 08:10, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea in theory. But since a lot of the articles were started as stubs from an unreliable source (Encyclopedia Mythica), the priority has been to verify all the articles first - otherwise the gender might be wrong, and even the 'deity' bit. However if the article clearly identifies its subject as a god or goddess, AND it has verified sources, you could add the categories as you suggest. Not all of the articles deal with deities. That has been another problem with Encyclopedia Mythica and non-Pacific sources generally - everything gets called a god. However please don't remove them from the Māori mythology category at this stage - that can be done fairly simply later. Kahuroa 10:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleaning up this category
Talk:M15 pistol

message: It was individually issued to general officers (Brigadier General O-7 or higher), it was not issued to non-general officers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.177.201 (talk) 10:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  M15 is a general officers' pistol 

message: Is this weapon still in use? I mean is there any General today, in 2017, who carries the M15 as a duty pistol? --Exodianecross (talk) 03:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, but that wasn't my question. I wanted to know if there is still someone in active service to whom this weapon was issued! --Exodianecross (talk) 20:06, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still in use?
Talk:Lokhandwala Complex

message: How to reach to Lokhandwala from Andheri Station?
the best way to reach lokhandwala from the station, if you don know the way is to take a B.E.S.T. bus.
Tulika 99 15:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: test  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.11.83.66 (talk) 20:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  test
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject on Adminship/Tweaks

message: Raising/lowering thresholds by which consensus is gauged will be of little effect. RfAs don't typically fall into the gray area; they pass with near-100% support or fail dismally. I consider this a symptom of deeper issues. 
There is no real cure for editcountitis. People who think an editor's value can be numerated are fools and there is no cure for this disease except age. If I wanted a high edit count, I'd not write my comments externally and edit them heavily there before pasting into this box, previewing a few times, perhaps rewriting, then finally submitting. No, I'd save a dozen versions before moving on. I certainly wouldn't spend hours creating graphics "worth" only one edit each. AWB drives the entire issue into absurdity. 
Limiting RfA suffrage to existing admins is not a tweak; it is the sabotage of the community. Strongest double secret super speedy whack with an axe™. John Reid 08:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Habonim Dror Australia

message: I don't think my Hebrew spelling was very good on the words I used. If someone comes across this, can you check it?
-- Thanks, Liam 08:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps then "At the moment, due to..."? -- Liam 12:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, that sounds better, Liam. -- User:reubenbolaffi --124.177.229.59 11:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject on Adminship/Provisional

message: No need to contrast one with the other. Both are possible approaches -- reconfirm probationers once, reconfirm all periodically. 
I like fixed terms myself, with a prohibition against reapplication for a latency period. Good performance during a set of "lower house" admin terms would qualify a candidate for the "upper house" with longer terms and no latency. John Reid 08:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Ionian League

message: I read about the twelve Ionian cities in Herodotus, but had trouble finding this page.
The name of the "league" seems not to be standard.  
Clazomenae refers to the "Dodecapolis", without a link (but I shall probably change this).
It would be good to see more ancient sources cited here.
David Pierce 08:29, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Post-reform radiate

message: The image shown is an Antoninianus of Gallienus. The post-reform radiate, while still including a radiate crown, was not the same coin. This image should be replaced with an actual post-reform radiate of one of the Tetrarchs1ThatGuyJoe1 (talk) 14:32, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong coin shown in image 

message: None of the references in this article can be considered valid sources: one of them is a blog; the other two are sites where coins can be auctioned. Even the first item in the Bibliography section is a site similar to Wikipedia itself where one needs only an account to edit articles. Is there some way to place a notice about lack of legitimate sources on the article?
AnonymousMusician (talk) 14:55, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: References and examples of most Roman Imperial coins (and tens of thousands of Greek coins) can be found on wildwinds.com. I do not permit people to copy wildwinds coins to other websites. But access to wildwinds is free. DK, wildwinds.com 2A00:D2E0:101:3E00:1C17:F9F0:F921:E7C6 (talk) 16:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "References" aren't actual references
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject on Adminship/Opposite

message: Wikipedia:Requests for Deadminship speaks to my heart but my head says no. What ought to be either exceptional and rarely used or routine and no big deal would become a process that let so much blood we'd have to use a fire hose after each nomination. Think the worst, most contentious, biased, nasty RfA you've ever read and square it. John Reid 08:31, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Colt Automatic Rifle

message: this picture should be of interest to you all.
https://imgur.com/a/kJ8dM  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.91.247 (talk) 04:25, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Photographs in and of themselves are not reliable sources. That one certainly isn't proof of anything. - BilCat (talk) 09:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your opinion? You realize you were supposed to use reverse image search to find the news articles which use it? I know you won't be able to find every article, but you at least would have been able to find http://www.sadefensejournal.com/wp/?p=1625&page=2  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.16.91.247 (talk) 00:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  CAR spotted in use by the mexican military in the 2010s 

message: In the mouseover preview of this article, there is no image. Put your cursor over this link and see for yourself: Colt Automatic Rifle. I tried to fix it by using the proper infobox syntax but it didn't seem to help. Any Wikipedia wizards out there willing to debug this? Tengwar (talk) 14:25, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  No image in article preview
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject on Adminship/Algorithm

message: The trouble with interpreting oracles is that they are traditionally obscure. Jimbo is no different. What did he really say? 
We might well promote all editors who manage to stay in our community for 1 year without screwing up badly. This eliminates RfA entirely but virtually demands RfDA, which sanity forbids. John Reid 08:38, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:2R2M mortar

message: Or is EMTAS an entirely different system without mention in all of Wikistan?
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2012/09/27/defense-delays-sending-mortars-commanders-urgently-seek/57848956/1
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=bc3a9100b78aa8b8177e5f3ff48528d8&tab=core&tabmode=list
Hcobb (talk) 22:42, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is EMTAS another name for Dragon Fire? 

message: I think the Dragonfire may have been canceled in favor of a french 120mm non-self-loading mortar. the article should probably be updated to reflect this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.36.40.230 (talk) 18:51, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dragonfire Cancelation?
Talk:M198 howitzer

message: MV-22 transportable? I think I have seen pictures and the stats say it would be borderline. I would think so. I would hope the Marine Corps would next generation helicopter/tilt rotor not to carry the current mainstay arty system. Although, by the time Osprey has fully replaced the phrogs M777 will be well on its way of replacing the M198. --ProdigySportsman 04:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  MV-22 Osprey 

message: When did the M198 enter service? What did it replace?--TGC55 (talk) 10:34, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entry into service? 

message: What's the maximum parabolic height can it achieve, assuming that the barrel has being fired from an angle of 30 degrees and 45 degrees?
88.105.124.150 (talk) 11:49, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maximum Height 

message: Page states Copperhead round is no longer in inventory or use by United States. I do not question the fact, feel it is significant and should be referenced. Wfoj2 (talk) 22:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copperhead Round 

message: It appears that this piece is still in use by the Marines; the page should probably reflect this. Nfgusedautoparts (talk) 18:24, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still in use by USMC 

message: That can't be right.  A disc of area 1000 has a radius of 17.8m.  If the illumination source is 600m high, it's going to  light up a circle much larger than that, maybe a square km (1,000,000 square meters)  The whole section is already tagged "More citations needed".  I found a gunnery manual which covers illumination and other things.  Also a grid square seems to be a much larger area.  Thundermaker (talk) 02:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  1 grid square (1,000 square meters)
Talk:Ceduna, South Australia

message: I live here!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.139.135.211 (talk) 04:27, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: i do too!!!!!!!!!! did u know that jack smart, the drummer/vocalist for the metal band(s) RED-ART and Me VS Myself was raised up in ceduna????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.219.0.86 (talk) 12:08, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEWS FLASH 
Talk:FV Gaul

message: I have often wondered why she sank in such a sea as she was designed for. As a professional geologist with more than a passing interest in ships and the oceans, I wonder if she sank for a reason that seems to be on everyone's lips these days but seemingly was never considered. The release of gas hydrate from the sea bed is known to occur, it causes the water to have the appearance of "boiling" and in fact the water is a massive area of escaping gases - similar to the effect of shaking a bottle of fizzy drink and releasing the top - what comes out is almost all gas and gas cannot support the displacement of a ship. The result is the ship falls (sinks) faster than the crew may be able to react and certainly making it impossible to send an SOS or MAYDAY call. I would like to see if that hypothesis holds up. Thanks, The Geologist (talk) 17:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  An Idea?? 

message: Seeing as the external link (http://the-trawler-gaul.blogspot.com/) is no longer covering the Gaul or her loss, but general political discussion, I'd suggest it be removed. 198.12.16.4 (talk) 19:22, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead! Shouldn't have been here in the first place—WP:NOBLOGS.--AntientNestor (talk) 20:24, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing external link
Talk:Laid Back

message: White horse as a euphemism for coke? Never heard that. Always heard "horse" for heroin. Any other opinions? Are they talking about C or H?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.158.90 (talk) 00:13, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe they have done work with Blank and Jones on the song "Simple Life".  Should that be included here?  Are there other collaborations? - KitchM (talk) 22:55, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work with Blank and Jones 

message: gay? Mazarin07 (talk) 08:11, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are they...
Talk:Henry Jones (entrepreneur)

message: Needs to be trimmed to just the encylopdic bits.  Regards, Ben Aveling 09:15, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Terje Aa

message: I moved the page to Terje Aa, and added the redirection here. 'Aa' is the correct spelling of his surname. Norsey 17:44, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (Completed with the talk page as well) Hm; I don't know what was on my mind. I guess I'll have to fix the spelling in the incoming links as well. Duja► 09:48, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject on Adminship/BN

message: After writing my list of wacky ideas for fixing RfA, I finally got around to checking out the other WPOA subpages -- and I see most of these are already being considered. Maybe I'm wrong and these are not altogether wacky. But I still think we have a much deeper problem to solve than adminship. John Reid 09:26, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wacky ideas
Talk:Miss United States

message: When does the pageant happen?  March, October, June ??
When and What are the lead up milestones and deadlines?  How would a girl qualify to get into the contest??
What are the "duties" of the titleholder?  Public appearances at high schools, public speaking, ??
--209.221.206.206 15:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some questions on timing 

message: Someone has edited the page to say that Mandy Peterson is Miss United States 2020. Mandy is MS. United States 2020. MISS United States 2020 is Tiffany Ann Rea of California https://www.mrsunitedstates.com/queens/2020/tiffany-rea
(when the page is edited to this effect, it keeps getting edited back to Mandy Peterson). 
This pageant is broken down into several different divisions, thus it can be confusing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AfternoonDelight1 (talk • contribs) 13:17, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Miss United States 2020
Talk:Glenn Grøtheim

message: I added quite a few results, and removed the transnational team result from 1993, as it seems rather minor compared to the other successes. Perhaps the stub marking could be removed now? Norsey 17:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gambling 3NT

message: Should there be a note in the inital paragraph that we're describing the common partnership agreement? For example, it's not that you bid gambling 3NT with "often no side A". That's a partnership agreement for the convention.  --TsuKata 04:35, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partnership Agreement 

message: Do you reckon it is worth mentioning sequences like (1H) 3NT = heart stop and running minor and (1H) 3H = no heart stop but running minor here? Cambion 18:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar bids
Talk:Yubisaki Milk Tea

message: *Mainia: Vol 1
*PopCultureShock: Vol 1 & 2
*Anime News Network: Vol 1
*Tokyopop page:Official page
: I'm surprised there aren't more reviews -- I saw quite a few when it first came out, enough that I was suckered into buying the first volume. —Quasirandom (talk) 01:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  it's because of the terrible ending, anyone who read up until that became too emotionally wounded to review it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.68.99.157 (talk) 00:24, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref dump 
Talk:Rumah Gadang

message: This section could do with some expanding. Ie, a description of the steps involved. Also any ceremonial/ritual aspects?Merbabu 09:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Construction

message: Surely the General references could be tied more closely to support statements in the text of this article, which doesn't yet offer any sources for its statements but the one title. Couldn't this be brought up to Wikipedia standards? --Wetman (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Zopilote Machine

message: When was the Allmusic review for "Zopilote Machine" written? I don't see it listed on the website.--DrWho42 (talk) 06:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allmusic Review
Talk:Gruppenführer

message: If You met a GruppenFuhrer You would raise your right arm and Say Heil SS GruppenFuhrer
:Actually I don't think this is true, the "ultimative" nazi salut was "Sieg Heil" or "Heil Hitler", I don't think you had to solute any lower rank, since that would place the lower rank on the same level with the "ultimative" Führer, wouldn't it?--87.178.212.71 (talk) 00:08, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

message: ^Dork. Anyway, the rank was used by the German army in the WWI. So SA wasn't the first to use it.--Ukas 14:24, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WWI

message: The smallest tactical ff unit is a so called "Trupp", which is lead by a "Truppführer", it's at least 2 men strong and not more than 6. It even has an own symbole, it's basicly the same as the "Gruppenführer" but has only 1 dot above it --87.178.248.49 (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Firefighting Corps

message: I think this article is biased way too much toward Nazi organizations. Gruppenführer is also a contemporary designation for anyone who is in charge of a group of people. It is used as a rank in the fire departments and other civil and rescue services, and as military post or temporary assignment. In many companies managerial positions below department manager are often refered to as Gruppenleiter, which also translates as group leader or group manager.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.226.19.30 (talk) 21:53, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other uses of Gruppenführer

message: To the Anon with the dynamic IP address who has been conducting a revert war to change the variant of English in this article to a different variant: Please read WP:ENGVAR and then tell us your reasoning for changing the spellings in this article from American to British? As far as I can see, the article is and has been predominantly in American English. Please resolve this issue here on the talk page. —Stephen (talk) 10:34, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have asked for the page to be semi-protected at WP:RFP. (Hohum @) 12:24, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: I forgot to log in, but the edit removing the nonsensical Major General equivalency is mine. Generalleutnant absolutely equals Lt. General in Anglo armies, and General-Leitenant in RKKA. All three are supposed to command a unit above division-size (Corps/Korps/Korpus). I don't know what the source mentioned there says, but I'll gladly provide my own ones if someone will insist. At the moment, I just removed the offending sentence. IDiO (talk) 07:29, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rank equivalency.
Talk:Unobservable

message: This article could be merged into Object of the mind. 03:24, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Going to move forward with merger. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 15:01, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, please don't. At least not in the current state. In philosophy of science typical examples of "unobservables" are atomic particles, the force of gravity, does not fit within "Object of the mind" William M. Connolley (talk) 15:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

text:  It would seem more natural to propose to merge Abstract object with OotM William M. Connolley (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Maybe ... I am indifferent, wonder if anyone has bothered to better classify these strange things like Categories_(Peirce) has.  Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 16:16, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose merge into [[Object of the mind]] 

message: This page has no sources. Its In philosophy of science typical examples of "unobservables" are atomic particles, the force of gravity, causation and beliefs or desires[citation needed] conflates real object - atomic particles - with states of mind. It should probably be rewritten/blanked/redirected/disambig'd. Anything but left in its present state William M. Connolley (talk) 11:46, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Junk 

message: I removed the sentence on Berkeley since it seems to me that it is based on a misunderstand of Berkeley. He didn't hold that things like trees or tables are unobservable but that there are no unobservable things (except perhaps for other minds): "esse est percipi".Phlsph7 (talk) 12:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Berkeley
Talk:Wilson Kirwa

message: What is "ammattikorkeakoulu" in English? JIP | Talk 11:04, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sheila Jordan

message: I see some "citation needed" tags and there is a lot of biographical information in the External Links section. I'm going to do some work on the article, modernizing and clarifying.  009o9 (talk) 23:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work in progress 
Talk:One-off housing

message: OK so here is a first attempt at a page about one-off housing. 
I have done my best to be as neutral as possible so please don't add any of your own opinions or analysis to this article, but please do add any relevant opinions or analysis you can find from source material WP:RS.
Here's a few things that I think are missing from this article:
*A photo of a classic modern one-off house
*Something about the aesthetics and size of one-off houses
*Comparison with policies in other countries
*Policies of other political parties (Sinn Féin, Greens, Labour)
Curtains99 11:20, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: What's missing

message: I reverted schuhart's edit to the subsidies section as it violates WP:NPOV. Wikipedia pages contain either undisputed facts or referenced assertions from published sources. They do not analyse or comment on those published assertions no matter how much any editor disagrees with them.
Articles should rely on secondary and not primary sources. See Wikipedia policy WP:PSTS for an explanation of different types of source. You may not quote from primary source material such as CSO statistics and then make your own analysis and draw your own conclusions. You may however, quote from somebody else who has done this and had this analysis published in an acceptable source such as a journal or a newspaper. 
You can even get your own analysis published  and then quote from it but you may not publish the results of original research in Wikipedia. See WP:OR for the policy on this. Thanks for your contribution and please don't be put off from contributing further within the guidelines.
HapaxPhenomenon (talk) 10:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert schuhart's contribution
Talk:Jay Schottenstein

message: I just paid attention, that article about Jay L. Schottenstein already exists, but it lacks most of my information. Hence articles should be merged.Narshavs 11:25, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The line at footnote 6 says that the Schottenstein family gave $30 million to Kasich in 2016. But the linked New York Times article only reports a $1 million donation.
Sajita (talk) 23:55, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political donations