lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Edison Elementary School (Edison, Washington)

message: If anyone could find anything out about the history of Edison High School / Elementary School, that would be great. --clpo13 14:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 
Talk:Kimberley Brewery

message: I see this page is earmarked for a cleanup. This is not how I originally left the page. It was neat and tidy. As a relative newcomer to Wikipedia, I do not have the knowledge to alter the page to Wikipedia format so I'd appreciate help from whoever decimated the page.
LJ Ray Sutton Bridge 14:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
File talk:Lunar libration with phase2.gif

message: This picture was placed on the news page with a vandalist message. 67.188.172.165 19:33, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: === Message 1 ===
Somebody renamed this picture and it is gone from here.  It is in a different place from the links at the bottom.  Somebody needs to clean it up and make them all point to the same place. 74.138.48.123 14:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Image 

message: Somebody renamed this picture and it is gone from here.  It is in a different place from the links at the bottom.  Somebody needs to clean it up and make them all point to the same place. 74.138.48.123 14:18, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Message 1 

message: I don't understand every detail of Wikipedia technology, so I'll just dump my observations about the missing image here. Maybe someone can make a sense out of them.
Below is the original URL that doesn't work:
* http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c0/Lunar_libration_with_phase2.gif
However, if you add only a question mark or a slash after this URL, it shows the picture:
* http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c0/Lunar_libration_with_phase2.gif?
* http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c0/Lunar_libration_with_phase2.gif/
* http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c0/Lunar_libration_with_phase2.gif/blahblah
It seems related to the fact that certain-sized (200px, 300px, but not 199px or 201px) thumbnails of this image work—without the original file working:
* \[\[Image:Lunar_libration_with_phase2.gif|200px|thumb|right|Resized thumbnail\]\] (did work—updated 06:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some URLs and Thumbnails Still Work 

message: Everything works properly now. I disabled wikicode of the illustrations in my previous message to spare user's browser resources because they don't illustrate the problem properly anymore anyway in its absence.
—6birc, 06:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Problem Anymore
Talk:Keisei Main Line

message: The words Morningliner, Eveningliner, Skyliner, and Cityliner are "coined words" used by Keisei.
http://www.keisei.co.jp/keisei/tetudou/railmap/railmap.pdf
Chiro08 (talk) 03:56, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I see. I'll restore the spellings in this article, and also move the City Liner article (to Cityliner (train)) to match the spellings used by Keisei. --DAJF (talk) 08:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of Morningliner 

message: Recently, I've been seeing these types of text-based station numbers pop up. Example:  corresponds to Keisei-Ueno.
Will there be any more text-based station number templates? J4lambert (talk) 21:53, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. I created the template (), and other templates I created are:  and . However, these templates are experimental so far, and how to use them is debatable. Thank you. --Chiro08 (talk) 03:13, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Text-based station numbers
Talk:Art Green (artist)

message: Heavy Weather: Art Green Retrospective
:Ok Thanks, I will try to mension that in the article. --Talk 17:02, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  local library not got it. – Talk 20:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Book on Art Green
Talk:The Coquette

message: ---- She died in 1840, so 1856 is 16 years after her death, not 26 years!
Possible additions to section on criticism and theory:
Karen Weyler's article, "Marriage, Coverture, and the Companionare Ideal" discusses coverture, a common law practice that means that all property, equity, and assets of an unmarried woman becomes the property of her husband when she marries. Traditionally, societal norms of companionate marriage led to the systematic inequity of coverture and thus the man became the sole point of authority. Within The Coquette, Foster illustrated the abuse of coverture through Sanford when he pursues Nancy for her assets and to sustain his lifestyle and pursue Eliza. In her article, Weyler elaborates on women's legal disappearance and the subsequent legal monetary squandering by men under the disguise of affectionate marriage. 
Weyler argues that the character of General Peter Sanford personifies the evils of coverture.  Throughout the novel, Sanford's calculating character is deceitful, contributing to Eliza Wharton's demise.  Foster makes her point at the end of the novel, when Eliza dies a humble death while Sanford is left scorned and impoverished.
In Ivy Schweitzer's atricle Foster's Coquette: Resurrecting Friendship From the Tomb of Marriage, Schweitzer argues that Foster's protagonist Eliza Wharton is breaking away from the institution of traditional Federalist marriage in pursuit of equalitarian friendship, which parallels the ideals of the Revolutionary Era. Eliza's nonnormative approach involves friendship within the female social sphere in hopes of liberation. However, Eliza's loss of her female friends due to their matrimonial responsibilities leads to her affair with Sanford, which exascerbates her depression, and she eventually dies. 
 Jentuser (talk) 15:51, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Elvis (1968 TV program)

message: Hello,
Just to let you know that I, Rikstar, am also responsible for additions and corrections made by 62.136.54.181. A lot of them I know, but I hope you think they are objective and suitably expand this article.
I am about to change 'Elvis' to 'Presley' throughout to meet wiki convention re: names Rikstar 05:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'd like to see more information on how and when this became known as the "Comeback Special," particularly because it was not the official title of the broadcast but is the title of the article. I wonder if it wouldn't be appropriate to retitle the article "Elvis (1968 television special)" with a redirect from "Elvis Presley's '68 Comeback Special"? Clconway (talk) 15:15, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of "Comeback Special" title 

message: Per WP:COMMONNAME, this article should be called The '68 Comeback Special.  It is almost *never* referred to by the article's current name, even if it is the original one. 128.151.71.16 (talk) 12:55, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, '68 Comeback Special is the name which the show came later to be known as. The introduction pretty much clarifies that it is known as such. All of the 1968 publicity surrounding the show uses the original name. It is also not the only show in the Singer Presents... series (check for example, Singer Presents...Herb Alpert & The Tijuana Brass).--GDuwenTell me! 20:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming article
Talk:The Tale of Two Lovers

message: There were two links on this page, both leading to the page about Pope Pius II, and the first had the man's real name, so I removed that link. Could anyone please tell me if I should have removed the second one instead, or not have removed either? I removed it on the basis of the "no duplicate and repeat links" rule from the Manual of Style. (Edit: Forgot to sign when first posting, sorry.)--Thylacine24 (talk) 23:00, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed redundant link
Talk:Genetic equilibrium

message: I am improving the page for a class project under the supervision of Dr. Susan Chapman (User:Drsusan1968) at Clemson University.
Anirudhvc (talk) 01:54, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing The Page

message: This article is poorly written. It does not define the term and, for an article one would expect to sound complicated, seems too basic. This is better suited for Simple English Wikipedia. 14:27, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: This

message: It's been suggested this article be merged with the one on Hardy--Weinberg Equilibrium, and I concurr.
I've just read a pile of stuff on Hardy--Weinberg in a text on genetics, and it appears genetics theory tends to discuss genetic equilibrium in terms of Hardy--Weinberg.  Also, the article on Hardy--Weinberg is much better developed as well.
The merged article should be under Hardy-Weinberg as well.
199.213.199.33 (talk) 17:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  Though the author of this article is very confused.  The Hardy-Weinberg principle applies in the absence of differential selection.  A genetic equilibrium, meaning that there is no evolution, however may be achieved in frequencies other than equalling expected H-W frequencies, e.g. by overdominance.  Also, subpopulation effects (Wahlund effect) are not considered.  There is also the case of fixation (resulting in selection-mutation balance).--I am not a dog (talk) 11:43, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge With Hardy--Weinberg
Talk:Exercises in Style

message: It was translated to Serbian language by Danilo Kiš.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.200.74.159 (talk) 06:00, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: translation
Talk:Soap film

message: What is the difference between "soap film" and "soap bubble"? If there is no difference, wouldn't it be better to merge this article with soap bubble? --Acepectif 14:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess the difference is that a soap bubble is in fact a bubble, while a soap film can be in virtually any shape. —Kri (talk) 20:41, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difference between a soap film and a soap bubble 

message: Could someone, please, edit it explaining what is Soap film for? Thanks.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabiotheoto (talk • contribs) 17:19, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is it for? 

message: you marked the article for Template:Cleanup rewrite, are you thinking of doing so? If not, please leave a description with the main issues in the article. Other templates are also available to indicate specific issues.--ReyHahn (talk) 14:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite template
Talk:Kahle v. Gonzales

message: Why is this page called Kahle v. Gonzales instead of Kahle v. Ashcroft? Sander123 14:35, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because John Ashcroft has been replaced by Alberto Gonzales as Attorney General of the United States; my understanding is that since the case was not directed at John Ashcroft as a person, but only in his position of Attorney General, it is automatically redirected at his successor. Schutz 15:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Right. Makes sense, thanks! Sander123 20:17, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of article
Talk:Hollywood Pantages Theatre

message: I added a photo this morning. The place is plastered with Lion King banners, but a photo now exists. Minnaert 21:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I've removed the . Mike Dillon 22:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo(s) requested

message: I have rewritten this article, partly because too much of it appeared to have been copied and pasted from the Broadway LA web site. It was also lacking in links to related WP articles. Whyaduck 14:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: Perhaps the article should be named Pantages Theater, since the theater is located in the U.S. and not in Europe. I think the convention is to use American spelling for articles about American entities, and British spelling about entities outside America. A London theatre would be spelled theatre: for example, Globe Theatre. If the article's title is modified, the word theatre would be changed to theater throughout the article. I can think of no other obvious changes.
Donfbreed (talk) 23:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The proper name of the place is "Pantages Theatre" so any other spelling would be incorrect. However if American spelling is used in the article then the word theater, when used generically should have the "-er" spelling, but any mention of a theater whose offical name is spelled "-re" should of course use the correct spelling for that venue. Markhh (talk) 03:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: There are presently no productions listed for 2012 - either the list should be corrected, or an explanation provided for the gap in years.  PKT(alk) 16:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2012?
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Lyon

message: St Irenaeus should be mentioned here surely. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.226.1.136 (talk • contribs) 14:45, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Someone needs to note the earlier cardinals who were archbishop of Lyon.  I placed "(Cardinal)" in the lines of newer ones.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 17:35, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  earlier cardinals from this see 

message: Is there any source supporting Lyon's elevation to Archdiocese during the end of the 2nd century? According to GCatholic (which was the only source I could find), its status as archdiocese comes from the confirmation of Rome's jurisdiction over the West in 325. ―Eduardogobi (talk) 19:51, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Oi Eduardo- You may have already tried this, but just in case: fr.wp makes the same assertion, and cites a page on catholic-hierarchy.org as its source. That page lists sources at the bottom. Hope this leads you to something useful. Eric talk 23:38, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elevation
Talk:Konrad Schumann

message: It states "After the fall of the Berlin Wall opened". What does this mean? What should this really say?
Popsix 19:36, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar? 

message: The article says that West Germans shouted "komme über", which I doubt is correct (I am a native speaker). The most likely, shouted form of "komme herüber" would be "komm rüber", but I am reluctant to make the edit, because there are no sources for this, and the German version of the article does not mention any encouragement, apart from the presence of the police car. 86.185.196.147 (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the article said, "komme rüber" until the most recent edit, which was to remove the r. I don't speak German and don't know which is correct, but if you, as a native speaker, think the r should be there, feel free change it back. Armadillopteryxtalk 21:13, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The "r" should be definititely there. "Komm rüber" or "Komme rüber" is okay, "komme über" has no grammatical sense.--Fuball (talk) 21:08, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "komme über"? 

message: This article doesn't explain why there were at least 2 photographers and 1 cameraman at that place in that very moment. Conrad Schumann jumped the barbed wire and into the car in just 4 seconds.
# Photographer 1 / Unknown CIA employee (according to Commons author info). He took at least 4 pictures
# Photographer 2 / Peter Leibing. He took at least 1 photograph, the famous one. The perspective is a bit different from the Photographer 1.
# Cameraman 1 / Unknown. He recorded this footage.
In Peter Leibing article, it remarks "the Hamburg picture agency Contiepress, had been tipped by police that an East German border guard might escape". Was the scene staged? emijrp (talk) 09:23, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: Oh 2A02:C7F:3869:EE00:9D3C:EA7D:50F4:8E10 (talk) 17:13, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  He killed everyone
Talk:Rowland Allanson-Winn, 5th Baron Headley

message: Was Lord Headley the first Muslim in the House of Lords or even the UK Parliament?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.210.79 (talk) 11:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Any evidence this man was Irish? Seems to have been born and educated in England. The Baronetcy he inherited is in the Irish peerage but that doesn't mean he ever lived there. Adhiyana (talk) 22:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irish?
Talk:Paris Opera Ballet

message: To add substantial contents to the article's text you have to refer to French sources (ballet in France, "a world of its own") --Surano (talk) 07:59, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: After adding French sources I have added and will still try to add sources in English to the article. For some sources there already exist corresponding articles of the English Wikipedia such as La Danse (film) by Frederick Wiseman. --Surano (talk) 05:35, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Substantial contributions 

message: In French newspaper articles journalists writing reviews about performances usually refer to the Ballet de l'Opéra de Paris (Paris Opera Ballet), official announcements refer to the Ballet de l'Opéra National de Paris (Ballet de l'Opéra National de Paris). There is only one opera in Paris presenting performances in two opera houses (Opéra Bastille, Palais Garnier) and there is only one Paris Opera Ballet. Other venues are called theatres such as the Théâtre du Châtelet. --Surano (talk) 08:33, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Paris Opera Ballet vs Paris Opera National Ballet vs Ballet de l'Opéra de Paris vs Ballet de l'Opéra National de Paris

message: Where does the title of the assembly, Ballet du Théâtre de l'Académie Royale de Musique, fit in? It is used as an entry for the On This Day, of June 28th, 2017 Main Page post for the article on the play Giselle, and it is used again in the article Giselle, but it is never used in the article of the theatre itself, Paris Opera Ballet. It is also a redirect to that article, but omitted from reference within the article. Is this an oversight? Stevenmitchell (talk) 22:07, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Ballet du Théâtre de l'Académie Royale de Musique
Talk:Robert Boyer (artist)

message: Art McKay was my friend and cousin.
Why is he not listed as Métis?
I should have asked Ted Godwin while there was still time, but now Robert Gardikiotis of the Copper Kettle is also gone …
Robert McKay-Chifflet
99.245.191.116 (talk) 13:18, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art McKay, my Métis cousin
Talk:Sarah Gadon

message: FTR, I do not like the new 'Awards' table format, and prefer the previous 'Years'-first format. There is no advantage to an 'Awards'-first table format, and I find the info much harder to parse in this format... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 22:17, 5 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards table format change 

message: I used Rater, and it judged the article to be a 'B'. Not sure what's missing, though, that keeps it a 'C'. Alaney2k (talk) 19:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: What is "Rater"? Is this some kind of script? If you've been using this for all of your assessments, I definitely find its assessments questionable at best (as it seems to be consistently "inflating" assessment ratings IMO)... In any case, 'B'-class has like 6 specific criteria that need to be met, and articles should be checked by knowledgeable editors ("by hand") before being assessed as 'B'. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes Rater is a script. Then an editor reviews what it suggests and sets the values. It then does the actual edit to the file. Articles do move up from stub to start to C, etc. over time, so it is completely normal for them to change when a review is done. Pretty rare for an article to go down a level over time. Anyway, Rater provides an estimate, which I have found to be pretty good for a script. I disagree with it no more that 5% of the time, I'd say. I have been editing since 2006, I feel like I have a good general idea how to do this. Of course, I do admit I am not perfect. Alaney2k (talk) 20:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  assessment
Talk:Amalia Hernández

message: Since I've been unable to get an authorized photo I've uploaded a link to an external site with a photo.  Let's not strip it out.  It would be nice to see what Hernandez looked like.  Thanks.
Dogru144 14:41, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Link with photo
Talk:Charles Naylor

message: People keep posting an image from https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/6905398/charles-naylor . That image has no sourcing, and it doesn't look like a man born in 1806. Before posting it again, please consider whether you have any good reason to believe it to be a photograph of the congressman. Thanks. Zschrag (talk) 16:59, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  That's not a photo of Congressman Charles Naylor
Talk:Andrew Robinson Stoney

message: The subject of this article is Andrew Stoney, but the text of the article seems to be entirely about his wife.  Most of the content is copied directly from the article about Mary Eleanor Bowes. Dreadpiratetif 19:45, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I removed the content about about Mary Eleanor Bowes that wasn't directly relevant to the subject of the article. It could use some editing to make the first sentence read a little better, though.Koppas (talk) 21:57, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Subject of article

message: Recently the file :File:Andrew Robinson Bowes Esqr. as he appeared in the Court of Kings Bench by James Gillray.jpg (right) was uploaded and it appears to be relevant to this article and not currently used by it. If you're interested and think it would be a useful addition, please feel free to include it. Dcoetzee 05:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New file [[:File:Andrew Robinson Bowes Esqr. as he appeared in the Court of Kings Bench by James Gillray.jpg]] 

message: It looks like there may be a problem with the dates.  Look at the occurrences in 1777, The Lady meets Stoney "in the summer of 1777" yet later is married to him in January 1777? Also, some other questions in that year " a daughter born in August 1777"?  It seems some housekeeping around that date is called for.al (talk) 23:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Questioning the References to 1777

message: I took out a reference in the introductory paragraph to the expression 'stony broke' possibly having derived from Stoney's name, as it seems unlikely.  According to the OED the earliest usage of the slang term was in the mid-1880s (seventy years after Stoney's death) and the expression as first used was not 'stony broke' but 'stone-broke'. RLamb (talk) 08:04, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed reference to 'stony-broke'

message: Chronologically, this article skips from its subject's birth (simply mentioned as 1747) to his meeting his wife, thirty years later.  Surely more of his life is know that that.  Even Thackeray wrote more, and it surely wasn't all fiction. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 20:02, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huge gap
Talk:Roy Williams (playwright)

message: 'Williams has also done some work for television'? That's a bit feeble don't you think? Either say something about it or leave it out. That's much too vague! :-) ThePeg 15:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Glenelg, Highland

message: "...and for being the only plural Glen name" - then explain in the article *why* it's plural. We don't all speak Gaelic, I'm afraid! 81.158.3.25 15:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Sheffield Energy Recovery Facility

message: {--Alex 15:15, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Added to Sheffield project as has not been linked to any Sheffield articles, If any one knows of suitable articles please link this page in. -- BulldozerD11 (talk) 20:31, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Have linked to main Sheffield page section which is explaining the CHP aspect but but did not actually call it an incinerator, just a waste disposal facility. -BulldozerD11 (talk) 19:39, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WP Sheffield tag 

message: Article could do with a Photo adding, as can look well lit up at night - BulldozerD11 (talk) 17:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment