lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nutty Professor II: The Klumps

message: The article included unsourced claims about why Jada Pinkett was not involved in the sequel: "Gaines replaces Sherman's girlfriend in the first film, Carla Purty, because the actress who played her, Jada Pinkett, left due to marrying Will Smith, her pregnancy, and later her signing on to the sequels to The Matrix. Purty is mentioned to be just a friend."
This could be added back to the article later if anyone has reliable sources to go with it. It seems more like educated guesses than information that ever came from a proper source. The whole article has bigger problems, in that it is lacking a Production section and any details about how it was developed or how all the special effects and makeup were created. -- 109.79.190.97 (talk) 13:10, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jada Pinkett 

message: The plot is a complete mess.  It contains inaccurate information, leaves out important sequences, and contains an abundance of excessive details.  I'm going to rewatch the film and attempt to fix it, but if anyone else can work on it in the meantime, please feel free.
MaximumMadnessStixon (talk) 02:10, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Plot
Talk:Ernst Falkbeer

message: Having a blast with Wikipedia.  This is my first created page.  I'd just like to say I'd love any feedback or help with it. Lunch with Jason 03:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess I'd like some help with what to wikify (if that means hyperlinking) and what not to ? Lunch with Jason 03:58, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Any pictures? Perhaps a photo of this person? Perhaps a diagram of the Falkbeer Gambit chess position. added request for photo. ChessCreator (talk) 15:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  All help appreciated 

message: I haven't been able to find any references to him being Jewish. "Falkbeer" is a rare surname and just about all google hits are related to the chess player. Sounds to me like it might be Dutch origin? Not saying he wasn't Jewish but the categories are unsourced. MaxBrowne (talk) 05:00, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish?
Wikipedia talk:Trusted Users

message: What's the point of this page? Johnleemk | Talk 16:52, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know. Delete it if you want. --GeorgeMoney T·C 16:54, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure I understand. You created it. What purpose does this serve, exactly? Johnleemk | Talk 17:25, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was supposed to help make a new status like "Admin" or "Beaurocrat" or "Steward" or "CheckUser", but I see nobody uses it. --GeorgeMoney T·C 17:35, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe because it was never publicised. Even then, what purpose would this new status serve then? Johnleemk | Talk 17:37, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 1. To be a requirement for RfA's. 2. To be a whitelist for certian vandal-fighting tools. 3. To help approve people to use certain tools (VandalProof, AWB, etc..). 4. To help users know if somebody is trusted. 5. etc.... --GeorgeMoney T·C 17:48, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Delete it if you want. I really don't care. --GeorgeMoney T·C 18:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?

message: The proposal is not so pointless as it may seem. In the case you didn't notice, we already have several levels of "trustedness": admins, anon users (who are not allowed to start an article) and we have semiprotection with its built-in "truct threshold", and we have users on probation (read: not very trusted yet). Also, in some e-mailing systems there is a notion of "trusted sender", so the guy didn't get the idea out of the blue. 
But clearly the proposal is undercooked. `'mikka (t) 23:33, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ..."Huh?" - "Yep." 

message: This page was the subject of an MfD discussion closed on 11 June 2006.  The result was No consensus/default keep.  The proposal was rejected unanimously. Xoloz 02:42, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: MfD Result Notice
Talk:Gary Herbert

message: "The governor remains today in the Thomas Kearns Mansion in Salt Lake City, Utah."65.130.253.244 (talk) 22:50, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just now removed the final sentence of current version: 
Talk:Muqaddar Ka Sikandar

message: Someone really thinks that's too long a summary for a 3-hour movie? --174.56.0.212 (talk) 13:04, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Too long?
Talk:Kaala Patthar

message: The film is NOT a Hindi-Urdu production. It is officially a Hindi language production. Do refer the censor board certificate that appears before the opening credits.103.5.133.9 (talk) 01:11, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  LANGUAGE 

message: Can someone clear up the Sypnosis? It seems very amateurish. Maplesyrupcan (talk) 23:30, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sypnosis
Talk:Mickey's Diner

message: I'm not sure if this is actually a National Historic Landmark; it's not in the list at the National Park Service.  I'll see if I can call and verify this sometime.  --Elkman 19:01, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just saying. -Dan 05:34, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delicious buckwheat pancakes.

message: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=601711141955525&set=oa.651561513206469 
Should the Bob Dylan painting from 2021 Beaten Path now on show at MAXXI in Rome be included? Anyone who knows how to edit Wikipedia is welcome to add it. 
Htrowsle (talk) 23:45, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bob Dylan painting
Talk:Boom (film)

message: I heard this is pretty much a fancy soft-core porn move.  So my question is was anal attempted in this movie?  I'm looking for soft-core depictions of anal sex for a womens studies research project.  Of course I have plenty of hard-core porn examples but you'd be surprised how little anal sex there is in soft-core porn. 69.244.117.28 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:03, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Margaret McNamara

message: This article is in a strong need of a NPOV. V. Joe 04:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is no explanation of significance, in a few days I will merge this into the article for the organization. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 04:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a few days. :) 71.174.111.245 (talk) 12:39, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: POV?
Talk:Johannesburg Mountain

message: What's the correct high of the mountain?
   * The map distributed at the North Cascades National Park gives "8200 ft / 2499 m"
   * SummitPost.org gives "8200 ft / 2499 m"
   * PeakBagger gives "8200+ feet, 2499+ meters"
   * Bivouac.com gives "2505 m (8219 ft)"
I'm changing high in the article from "8,220 ft (2,506 m)" to 8200/2499 as it seems to be the more commonly given value.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Math2000 (talk • contribs) 06:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Environmental suit

message: It seems to me that :Category:Clothing and :Category:Protective gear should be applied to this article as well as :Category:Environmental suits per the Topic Article Rule from Wikipedia:Categorization/Categories and subcategories. Ziggurat 04:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Categories

message: The article is little more than a longer version of the one-line description on the :Category:Environmental suits page, and some examples which are obviously listed on that Category page. I can't see any additional value. Surely the page could simply redirect to the Category page and be done with it.
Yes/no? -- PaulxSA (talk) 09:37, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Redundant article. Delete?
Talk:Dress shoe

message: This article appears to be of an appropriate length for the subject matter under discussion. It is also appropriately categorized and wikified. 
By nature, stubbing and tagging articles devalues them, giving them an aura of unreliability and making them seem less credible. As part of my personal campaign to free up articles that have been stubbed and tagged without cause, this article has been disenstubbified. 
If any editor disagrees, and would rather re-stub it than improve it by adding actual content, please discuss here. The Editrix 04:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This generic post, which is being tacked onto the TALK pages of articles and stubs, is inadequate.  This is certainly a stub.  The opening sentence is inaccurate, no proper description of dress shoes, no specifics, there is more at shoe than there is here.  This article is indeed unreliable and not credible. Quill 09:31, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  De-stubbed
Talk:Elsie Lessa

message: Some text needs to be explained more fully. For example: "Elsie Lessa (1912-2000) - Brazilian journalist and writer. She was one of the most important journalists in the country." Why was she so important? Merely because she wrote for so long? Because of her beauty? Or something else?  Thanks, Hu Gadarn 04:29, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need explanations of some text
Talk:Temple of Castor and Pollux

message: The coordinates of this temple on the map are wrong. This tempel is located on the Forum Romanum, but it's now placed somewhere north of the Baths of Trajan. I'm not very familiar with the way you configure these coordinates, can someone who does correct this? Joris1919 (talk) 08:35, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: On Google Maps it's 41.891672,12.485594 Zyxwv99 (talk) 15:31, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Coordinates on map
Talk:Vertigo 2005: Live from Chicago

message: Has anyone ever disseminated which songs are from the 9th, and which are from the 10th?
I know that Beautiful Day was taken from the 10th
--Conor quinn 14:15, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: Should we mention that the song Wake Up by Arcade Fire is played as intro music at the start of the concert? Happiness is a Warm Bun (talk) 01:34, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: So I'm listening to my recording of this show and I'm quite certain they play the entire song "Gone" after "Vertigo" / "Stories for Boys". Then after "An Cat Dubh / Into the Heart" they play the entire song "Until the End of the World". Yet no setlists that I can find include those two titles. Is my recording mislabeled? HokieRNB 19:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions about setlist
Talk:Eastchester–Dyre Avenue station

message: Could a map be added for this station? This would help those (like me) who are not familiar with the transit system. Thanks, Hu Gadarn 04:31, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would a link to, say, Google Maps suffice? Or are you asking for a map to be inserted into the article? Or both? — Larry V (talk) 05:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  map? 
Talk:Kyoko Honda

message: I removed the "KYO SHALL DIE" and other such personal comments from this page.  Really now, this is an encyclopedia.  If you want to make little comments, do it on the talk pages. Kamirose 04:41, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal Comments
Talk:Oatman, Arizona

message: A town with stores where burro chow can be purchased, restrooms, and people living in it can't be a ghost town because it's not abandoned. Therefore I am removing this article from said category. Anynobody 08:39, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This isn't a ghost town... 

message: This is a great example of a ghost town, even if isn't completely 'abandoned'.
*Oatman - Arizona Ghost Town
*Oatman, Arizona - A Living Ghost Town
*Oatman, Arizona - on Historic Route 66
*Arizona Ghost Town - Oatman
A quick search shows plenty of references to Oatman as a ghost town.  Narthring (talk  • contribs) 03:13, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actually it is a ghost town 
Talk:Acclamation

message: This page needs to be split.--Mo-Al 04:53, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Acclimation and Walkover are the same thing, how are they different? Explain for me the difference that they deserve to both have their own article. Both Acclamation and Walkover mean to win an uncontested election. --Cloveious 23:21, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Acclamation and Walkover are not the same thing. The expression "to win by acclamation" in Canadian politics is pretty much the same thing as a Walkover, yes, but that form of acclamation is merely derived from the actual meaning of Acclamation, and that does not mean that the whole meaning of the word Acclamation is the same. If you read the article, an Acclamation is actually a verbal vote or salutation - taking the case of voting, which is most relevant to this discussion, it is quite possible to have multiple people nominated or voted for in an Acclamation vote, in which case none of them are going to be elected by unanimous decision, which would have been an Walkover. By contrast, a Walkover is by very nature a one-sided competition where there is absolutely no other competitor contesting the election or situation. The two are quite different. I very much believe the two articles should remain split. Falastur2 02:46, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Minnesota Lynx

message: Please leave the format the same way to keep it consistant with all the other teams.  Starze 05:13, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could we add a link to the page for the animal Lynx canadensis?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14F:4501:CE38:F0BE:BF2C:3ABC:C583 (talk) 23:56, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Mascot (Lynx, the animal) 

message: Hello. I'm a new fan and don't know anything about Facebook. Is LosLynx really worth taking three paragraphs to explain why it is meaningful? For me it slows down this whole article. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Hurray, good job. Thank you for retiring this section. -SusanLesch (talk) 22:56, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  LosLynx 
Wikipedia talk:The CIA World Factbook

message: I'm responsible for this proposal.  I hope I didn't make any terrible mistakes in creating the project page.  It's something that's irked me for a while, and I think Wikipedia would be much improved if the proposal would be discussed, improved itself, and adopted.  I'm perfectly willing to do some of the coal-face work and go through all the country articles once there appears to be consensus.
I, for one, support the policy.  NPOV statements in the economic assessment of countries, in particular, abound, and some of them are clearly inacceptable for Wikipedia.
RandomP 05:14, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment: Population data of many less developed countries is overestimated by the CIA Factbook. See Talk:List of countries by population/Archive 1. Polaron | Talk 14:04, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly suggest you guys read https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/docs/faqs.html . If you guys still have problems with the CIA Factbook, you are more than welcome to email them (email address provided on given site). Hope that'll erase some doubts and/or clear up some issues.--Ryz05 t 00:11, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the link!  I do not see anything there that pertains to the NPOV issues, and my doubts and issues with quoting the CIA world factbook as facts remain.  I'll add a couple of examples below, to go into a rationale section depending on how discussion about this goes.  RandomP 03:04, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Oppose  While I agree that some details contained in some of the overview sections have a biased POV, I believe that the World Factbook is one of the most respected sources available for use.  As such, I don't support a policy limiting its use.  Rather, while it's clumsy and time consuming, I'd prefer to leave it to be talked out whenever misuse of the World Factbook comes about. MikeNM 14:05, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Category talk:Ethnic groups

message: Seemingly there is a significant number of commentators which support the general removal of infobox collages. I think there is a great opportunity to get a general agreement on this matter. It is clear that it has to be a broad consensus, which must involve as many editors as possible, otherwise there is a big risk for this decision to be challenged in the near future. I opened a Request for comment process, hoping that more people will adhere to this proposal. Please comment here. Hahun (talk) 07:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal for the deletion of all the galleries of personalities from the articles about ethnic groups
Category talk:People by nationality and descent

message: Not a nomination, but a question/discussion item: 
In :Category:People by ethnic or national descent, there are mostly sub-categories named 'People of Foo descent'.  In :Category:Emigrants by nationality, there are mostly sub-categories named 'Foo emigrants'.  Looking down further into these sub-categories, they are both populated with sub-sub-categories named 'Foo Goo', where 'Foo' is the origin country and 'Goo' is the destination country.  Examples: see :Category:People of Canadian descent and :Category:Canadian emigrants, having :Category:Canadian Americans, :Category:Canadian Australians, etc.  Sometimes, in the matching sub-categories, the sub-sub-categories are the same; more often, there is partial or even no overlap. 
Should there be either be categories named 'People of Foo descent' or 'Foo emigrants', but not both?  Is there some naming decision somewhere that states what we should be using?  Was the decision never implemented or, worse, partially implemented?  What is happening here?  Thanks Hmains 21:51, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  question/discussion item
Category talk:American people by descent

message: Rather than debating these case by case, and Cydebot surreptitiously making changes without a CfD (as it did for Jewish-Americans→Jewish Americans), here is a comprehensive American guideline, as proposed at recent CfD, and the Village Pump, and annotated with some recent decisions. This differs from the world consensus, as follows:
#Multiple word ethnicities in the now standard form: Fooian people of Barian descent
#*:Category:American people of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines descent
#**Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 January 13#Category:Vincentian people
#Regional ethnicity parent categories without hyphen: Bar Fooian people
#*:Category:Native American people
#**Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 November 28#Category:Native Americans to Category:Native American people
#**Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 May 9#Category:Native American people and Category:Native American people of the Indian Wars
#Single word national ethnicity adjective followed by nationality (noun) without hyphen: Barish Fooians
#*:Category:Polish Americans
#**Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 May 3#Category:Americans of Polish descent
#*:Category:Turkish Americans
#**Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 May 2#Category:Turkish Americans
#National ethnicity compound adjectives followed by occupation (noun) must have hyphen, even though the parent category has no hyphen:
#*:Category:Italian-American musicians
#**Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 September 24#Italian Americans
Will folks enforce these in the future without exception? Otherwise, the bickering will continue.--William Allen Simpson (talk) 16:17, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming conventions

message: The family of the famous physicist Michel Ter-Pogossian fled Armenian Genocide from Turkey to Gemany, then moved to France, then to the United states. 
As a result, his bio is categorized into a multitude of cross-national category.
To save space, I will abbreviate categories "X-ans of Y-an descent" with "c:X<Y"
My question is, whether is it correct to classify Michel Ter-Pogossian with
:c:Tu<Ar (for:Category:Turkish Armenians), 
:c:Ge<Tu, c:Ge<Ar,
:c:Fr<Tu, c:Fr<Ar, c:Fr<Ge,
and finally,
:c:US<Tu, c:US<Ar, c:US<Ge, c:US<Fr (the last one for :category:American people of French descent).
This is not a joke, just look into the article.
I know people with even longer wander....
Are there a rule to reasonably restrict this categorization? 
Is there a more general page in wikipedia to discuss this issue? Ralph Saroyan (talk) 20:32, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Emigrants who landed in America after long travel
Category talk:Ethnic groups in the United States

message: Is there not a page for "American" as an ethnic group?  There are lots of pages for [insert origin or color]-American groups, but doesn't American by itself deserve a page? Sowelilitokiemu (talk) 01:58, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: How is "American" defined? From the USA? From North America? From either North or South America? This term is very very vague and is very USA-centered. I propose we stop using this term and stop referring to specific people as "NATION"-"American". It would be much easier to simply start each article with the person's birthplace and maybe a short mention of the country in which the person lived most of his/her life. For example:
Michael Fred Phelps (born June 30, 1985 in Baltimore, United States) is a swimmer.
or
Anastasia "Nastia" Valeryevna Liukin (; born October 30, 1989 in Moscow,Russia) is an artistic gymnast. She moved to the United States with her family when she was two and a half years old.
--Hamsterlopithecus (talk) 03:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: American?
Talk:Organic synthesis

message: Is there any way I could get someone competent to put an example synthesis of a spirocycle (ideally spiro[2,2]-pentane) on the spirocycle page?  I can't find a synthesis of something that simple on the Web, and my reference books are inadequate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fivemack (talk • contribs) 20:41, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: — Assignment last updated by CHEM 300 UBC CJA (talk) 18:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The edit I made was based around making the first sentence of the methodology section more understandable Leafsfan3 (talk) 20:25, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: CHEM 300
Category talk:Lists of American people by ethnic or national origin

message: I note in the categories that there are Irish Americans, Scottish Americans, Welsh Americans but no English Americans.  Nor, British Americans in any other category.  Am I missing something? 2A02:C7C:72BB:8F00:F85A:905E:98B7:8F92 (talk) 11:07, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No British or English Americans?