lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:Arsenal F.C.

message: I'd like to request to include a link to the current season. Maybe could change Seasons to "Past seasons" and include a "Current season". Thanks. --ClaudioMB 03:42, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since anyone is interested in discuss that, I'll make the change. --ClaudioMB 23:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, managed to miss this - in my opinion giving the current season is pandering to recentism and goes against the principle of only including top-level articles, i.e. all members of this box should be in a top-level category about the club :Category:Arsenal F.C. (or :Category:Arsenal L.F.C. in one case). Qwghlm 08:39, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

text: P.S.: Qwghlm, I appreciate you work to keep this template as good as possible, but in this case, your arguments sound just like bias against Arsenal F.C. 2007-08 article. If I wrong, please, explain better your point, then I could understand it and agree with you. Best regards.--ClaudioMB 18:42, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As I explained above, top-level articles are those that occupy categories :Category:Arsenal F.C. or :Category:Arsenal L.F.C., which the season article isn't - it is in a sub-category. As for recentism - arguing against biasing things towards recent history, is not the same as saying all recent content should be excluded. It is a question of balance. In this case - if the 2007-08 season is so important for inclusion in this template, why not the 1912-13 season, or the 1951-52 season as well? Qwghlm 21:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First, I didn't see any discussion or rule that doesn't allowed a no top-level article to be in this or any other template. If I'm missing something, please, clarify. Second, is there any problem Arsenal F.C. 2007-08 be part of the top-level article? Third, the reason to have the current season on this template is the same reason in the Arsenal F.C. article there is Current squad and other current information (highly interest but readers), and we should keep consistency (no consistency means bias). Regards --ClaudioMB 23:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

text: First, I didn't see any prior discussion or explanation about "the principle of only including top-level articles" here or any other template. If I'm missing something, please, show me. Second, is there any problem Arsenal F.C. current season article be part of the top-level category? I think it should be there and I'd like to include it. Third, the reason to have the current season on this template is the same whatever reason in the Arsenal F.C. there are Current squad (no 1912-13 or 1951-52 squads), Players out on loan and other current information. In my view, because those current information are very notable (no sure about the Players out on loan). It's important to keep consistency, no consistency means bias. Regards.--ClaudioMB 04:49, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Season
Talk:Linolein

message: looks weird
compare trimyristin  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.189.170.229 (talk) 19:05, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Both images are correct.  Linolein is just a bit awkward to depict because of the multiple cis double bonds.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:11, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  image
Talk:Vanadium hexacarbonyl

message: Well, yeah, and the second step of the synthesis?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.216.71.39 (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, y'all. I have some sources about process that led to the definition of the structure of his compound from 1959 to 1970s. I am going to add a dedicated paragraph. Do you have any feedback, before I start? Diegoriccio98 (talk) 13:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is about V(CO)6, a chemical compound.  The article is not a place to pay homage, so keep that in mind.--Smokefoot (talk) 15:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Aluminium hydride

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject Chemicals/List of A-Class articles. Recommended reading, Rifleman. Wim van Dorst (Talk) 21:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A-Class procedure 

message: I have added some basic stuff re monomer, dimer, structure, Lewis acid properties, possible application of adducts in MOCVD. However this article IMHO is still a way off A class.
On a point of detail I am not happy with the battery reference - it is nigh on 30 years old and I would be surprised if alane was still a candidate for H2 storage. Perhaps someone could confirm this.Axiosaurus (talk) 15:43, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating 

message: It says that the "dissolving process of aluminium trichloride requires the addition of 0.5-4 mol equivalents of borohydride salt, which is very expensive and not recovered"... That doesn't make any sense. First I don't understand why a borohydride salt would be needed, and secondly borohydrides are not expensive. In fact sodium borohydride is much much cheaper than the lithium aluminumhydride needed in the reaction.130.225.102.1 (talk) 12:44, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synthesis 
Talk:Origin of Jat people from Shiva's Locks

message: I have just been through the article removing the academic titles as per the "Wikipedia Manual of Style" - see: . Sincerely, John Hill (talk) 00:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed titles as per Wikipedia Manual of Style

message: Respected Sir, 
I personally feel that this article should be merged with the main article highlighting Jats, and I support the merger proposal. I think so because of several reasons, one of them being that it is a part of ancient Indian literature, which had been recorded in Sanskrit; the readers should also go familier with the ancient Indian point of view. Another considerable reason is that it is a very old reference regarding the Jat people, and even the collection of these old ancient Sanskrit Shlokas was done centuries back! So, I personally say 'YES' to the merger proposal. Thanks! Abstruce (talk) 20:26, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I am looking forward to a healthy discussion here! Thanks! Abstruce (talk) 20:46, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

text: On further reflection, my opinion is that a brief description of this account of the origin of the Jats does deserve to be included on the main Jat page with a clear link to this page where the interested reader can easily access the full details. However, I do think that it is far too long to just add it to the main article. Respectfully, John Hill (talk) 10:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: Dear Wikipedians, please recover this article as before merged in Jat people article. This article merged with Jat people without adding its content to the Jat people article, so we lost some important stuff from Wikipedia. I request you to recover this article as this revision or add content of this article to the main Jat people article. Thanks Ashok Todawata Talk 06:25, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recover request
Talk:L3/35

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Currently the L3/35 article contains information on the entire line of L3/33,35,38 tanks, and contains more information on L3/33 variants than the actual L3/33 page does. Being an important part of the L3/35's development, it is reasonable to just merge what the L3/33 page has to offer (not a lot it seems) to here and make a redirection. The article for other closely related lineages like MP 40 does the same thing, so I guess it's not new to military equipment Wikipedia. --Artoria2e5 contrib 02:09, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing stale discussion with no support; the argument doesn't seem to hold given the enormous expansion of L3/33 since December 2018. Feel free to re-propose if you disagree. Klbrain (talk) 08:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from L3/33
Talk:Inglis Falls

message: I'm trying to create a page on Inglis falls and update an article for it. Why are you deleting the newer version?
--Npeeff 15:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not see anyone deleting anything in this article. OR do you mean you are trying to create an entirely new article when this one is still active? How would that make sense????
Add to this one if you feel that it is incomplete.Peter K Burian (talk) 21:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Tentoxin

message: This is the correct name. the fungus was thought to be A. tenuis when submitted to ATCC, and was renamed to alternaria. 
Alternaria alternata (Fries) Keissler, anamorph; deposited as Alternaria tenuis Nees, anamorph
see here: ATCC
and here: Tentoxin from Fermentek
----  —Preceding unsigned comment added by AbuAmir (talk • contribs) 09:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  alternaria sp
Talk:Pinacolyl alcohol

message: The redirect Pinacolyl has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:32, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Pinacolyl]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Phenethyl alcohol

message: I created the article for 2-Phenylethanol without realizing that there was an article already under this synonym. The articles need to be merged since I have included data in the other article that is not present in this one. Bobby1011 01:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[2-Phenylethanol]] 

message: so the link for the data sheet does not work. It leads to a random weird page. 75.76.121.211 (talk) 00:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  safety data sheet 

message: The redirect Phenethyl has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Phenethyl]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Tebufenpyrad infobox

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... alternative methods for mergers are currently being discussed at User talk:Robert McClenon#Tebufenpyrad --Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 06:37, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand the proposal to be that this page is deleted to make way for Draft:Tebufenpyrad yet the current article has a complete infobox, which the draft does not. I'm reluctant to see this information lost, and have declined the speedy deletion on this basis. I suggest Wikipedia:Requests for history merge may be the way to go. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 09:23, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:Trimethylphosphine

message: The explanation given for the less s-p hybridization in phosphines than amines given: "The latter is a common feature of the chemistry of phosphorus because the gap between the 3s and 3p orbital is large compared to the corresponding gap for the 2s and 2p orbitals that are in the valence shell for carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen" is one that is repeated often when the subject arises. It is contradicted by experimental data (see: https://www.nist.gov/pml/atomic-spectra-database). The lowest state for the s2p3 configuration lies about 88,000 cm-1 below the lowest state for the sp4 configuration for nitrogen. For phosphorus, the lowest state for the s2p3 configuration lies 59,750 cm-1 below the lowest state for the sp4 configuration. In other words, the gap is larger for nitrogen.
Gadolinist (talk) 22:25, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Duchy of Urbino

message: There is a disparity here: 
"...the dukedom went to the Della Rovere papal family, who held it until 1625, when Pope Eugene IV annexed to the Papal States as Legazione del Ducato di Urbino (later Legazione di Urbino)."
Eugene IV was not the pope in 1625 but in the 1400s. The pope was Urban VIII.
I found three different dates for this reversion, so I'm leaving that morsel for now
I have changed the date of 1471 (which is wrong) to 23 August 1474, for the year when Federico da Montefeltro became Duke. See, for instance, "Storia dei Conti e Duchi D'Urbino di Filippo Ugolini" Accademia Rafaello -Urbino, 2008. Vol I p.504 "Avevagli il papa (Sixtus IV) gia promesso crearlo duca (e cio fece con bolla dei 23 agosto 1474).. " there follows a note which refers you to the Fondo Urbinate of the Archivio Statale di Firenze. signed Darius Sikorski  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.13.239.239 (talk) 09:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

message: Wasn't this a substate of the Papal state throughout? Gerard von Hebel (talk) 17:37, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Papal sovereignty 

message: Why are we only listing the spouses of the Duke's here? Wasn't it the Dukes who ruled Urbino?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.85.195.254 (talk) 20:53, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems strange indeed. Of course there were Dukes. Perhaps a wrong list was added to this article by mistake? Gerard von Hebel (talk) 21:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duchesses only?
Talk:Triphenylstibine

message: Although triphenylamine is, based upon the priodic table group the central element belongs, related to triphenylstibine and on that basis a common structure might be expected, the statement about the molecular form is evidently wrong. Triphenylamine in essence is a, although slightly twisted around the C-N-bonds, flat molecule with extensive conjugation of the nitrogen lone pair with each of the phenylrings as is clear from the pKa-values of the series phenylamines. I therefor excluded triphenylamine from the likeness line.T.vanschaik (talk) 22:44, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triphenylamine as related compound
Talk:Germacrene

message: Shouldn't patchouli be mentioned in this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 21:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the suggestion!  I've added a brief mention & link. Walkerma (talk) 05:17, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Patchouli]]
Talk:Quinuclidine

message: Is its boiling temperature really below its melting point?! 209.93.146.80 (talk) 23:09, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temperatures
Talk:Linolelaidic acid

message: should the article name not be Linoleaidic acid?
pubchem: http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary/summary.cgi?cid=5282457
Kosmologie (talk) 20:57, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: as above (and I see this article was originally named linoeladic acid before it was moved) it is definitely referred to as both. I'm not sure where it's appropriate to place the reference in the article, but I'm happy to move it. Perhaps before reverting again you could explain why -  Stelsa3000 (talk) 06:29, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Linoleaidic or linoeladic? 

message: the mp is WRONG!!! linoelic acid  mp is -5, the all trans FA cannot be teh same! - thta si teh WHOLE point! i have no time to fix - somebody need to get on it... the whoel point of trans vs cic, the whoel distictionabnotu hwo we thinsg ot linoeliadic a vs la is m.p,!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.194.97.51 (talk • contribs) 
:I corrected it and added a reference.  Thanks for catching the error and reporting it here. -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:22, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Melting point
Talk:TCEP

message: I don't know how to edit this page, but the ChemSpider molar mass is incorrect for this substance. That is presumably why the molar mass is listed differently in the text.  130.91.207.110 (talk) 17:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The molar mass in the box, 250.19, is correct and matches the correct value at ChemSpider.  The molar mass given in the text, 286.65, is for the hydrochloride salt.  That value is correct as well.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 19:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Molar mass
Talk:Francis Tresham (game designer)

message: Opening should change. 1829 didn't "inspire" the 18xx series of games.  It was the first game in the 18xx series of games.
The tone of this article is wrong.  It reads like "this is some guy who made some games," when it would be more accurate to describe Tresham as having designed two of the most broadly influential games ever made.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.170.60.84 (talk) 19:35, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Trirhenium nonachloride

message: *The boiling and melting points are listed as the same value. (Fixed)
*The density, 4800 g/cm3, cannot possibly be correct! (Fixed units)
*Missing or otherwise non-applicable data like flash point, dipole moment, RTECS number, and supplementary data should be removed rather than leaving them in the table with a question mark or a blank entry.
130.126.229.231 15:24, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Chem Infobox Incorrect and Missing Data
Talk:Lost River sucker

message: I am recreateing the Deltistes genus page for now, as it is not a monospecific genus as it also contains the extinct D. owyhee from the Glenns Ferry Formation.  There also seems to be an equal number of publication which regard Deltistes as a subgenus of Catostomus.  This should be covered. --Kevmin (talk) 18:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: monotypic? and genus?
Talk:Hexazine

message: Can Hexazine's instability be resolved if the lone pairs were used up by Lewis acids(for example N6*[B(OH)3]6).--Joey jumper94 (talk) 19:22, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Acids? 

message: The N_6^(2-) ion is described as antiaromatic on the basis of the electron counting rules for a pi-conjugated ring, but the pi electrons in this case may not all be conjugated into separate rings. The solid is reported in the reference to have a metallic luster, so the hexazine rings could be neutral and aromatic with the extra two electrons per ring delocalized into metallic bonding. Olthe3rd1 (talk) 18:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-aromatic dianion?
Talk:Lithium triethylborohydride

message: So, I have a questions for the authors of this article.  Why use the abbreviation/acronym LiTEBH? The in-line formula LiEt3H is no longer (by direct measurement with a ruler), and is understandale by any chemist. My view is that acronyms are a necessary evil in organic chemistry, but should only be used when a more readable chemical formula is not available, or takes significantly more space, or is itself hard to decipher. Especially an Encyclopedia, with its lofty goals of informing everyone, not just the hyper-specialists, should resist the acronym-mania of the synthetic organic chemists. ChemistHans 22:41, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

message: The referenced supplied for reducing lactones/esters does NOT discuss those reactions. Instead, it details reduction of alkyl halides!
Armadillo1985 (talk) 22:38, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: .--Smokefoot (talk) 14:15, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with reducing esters/lactones
Talk:Plumbane

message: http://www.chemspider.com/Chemical-Structure.109888.html?rid=64e277d4-59f3-49ce-892c-7993630b2bce&page_num=0
This source(which has been used for chem infoboxes) lists a diffrent boiling point, although the source may be wrong as that seems like a big jumb from SnH4 of the same group 
Someone should verify by a RS and also add melting point data ThatApollo777 (talk) 17:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boiling point data in info box is potentially wrong
Talk:Cobalt(II) naphthenate

message: Apparent contradiction:  The data in the chembox indicates this compound is a salt of napthalene carboxylic acids, yet the article naphthenic acid indicates it should be the salt of cyclohexyl and cyclopentyl carboxylic acids.  --Ed (Edgar181) 14:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The formula was wrong. I searched CAS, and the CAS number given in the infobox matches the name. CAS gives the formula as "unspecified", so I removed it. "Naphtenic acid" is not a pure compound; clearly someone confused it with naphthoic acid. --Itub 15:28, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for looking into it.  --Ed (Edgar181) 16:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Metal carboxylates are not normally classified as organometallic compounds. Shouldn't these involve metal-carbon bonds?150.227.15.253 (talk) 11:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have restored the article to an older version.  It looks like student classwork in 2012 introduced content that contains multiple errors and much off topic information.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:20, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hardly an organometallic compound
Talk:Methoxyethane

message: why is it called methoxyethane and not ethoxymethane  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Giza182 (talk • contribs) 18:57, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Because the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) have decreed it to be so. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 16:50, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  what determines thename 

message: Ethyl methyl ether has been reported to exist in space (but unconfirmed). Article should probably have a section about that since its earthly presence is so uninteresting. Octaazacubane (talk) 13:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Molecules detected in space"
Talk:Solenopsin

message: eg. Fire Ant Venom Toxin Analogs Improve Psoriasis in Mice ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:46, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could mention analogs being studied for psoriasis 

message: The current stereochemistry of solenopsin A – the name (2S,6R)-2-methyl-6-undecylpiperidine and the corresponding structure image (initial revision), seem to be wrong, according to the article about solenopsins absolute configuration. There are cis (also named isosolenopsins) and trans isomers (solenopsins) A,B,C (different long alkyls), but they “always” have R configuration on piperidine carbon with methyl (coincidentally IUPAC-numbered 2 in all three cases), so solenopsin A should be (2R,6R)-2-methyl-6-undecylpiperidine (, please note that the abstract image shows *synthetic* isomers (2S,6R) (3), and (2S,6R) (4); there's also (dated) review ; latest studies show that that is not always true; and the all four isomers exist in nature, but those with 2R configuration are prevalent, .) —Mykhal (talk) 15:58, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with your analysis.  I've updated the image and other data in the chembox to be consistent for the (R,R) isomer.  Perhaps an  explanation about the fact that the other isomers do exist in nature, but are not the most prevalent one, can be added to the article.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:22, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stereochemistry
Talk:Phillips's garra

message: Why are the Philipses in the scientific and the common name written different? Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 01:30, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Taxonomy
Talk:Thallium triiodide

message: I've added a space-filling model of the crystal structure to the infobox, and there are three further images available, which I'll put here in case needed.
File:Thallium-triiodide-xtal-3D-balls.png
File:Thallium-triiodide-xtal-Tl-coordination-3D-balls.png
File:Thallium-triiodide-unit-cell-CM-3D-balls-B.png
Ben (talk) 22:01, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure images