Talk:Serdar Argic

message: The "Identity of Serdar Argic" section needs cleanup.  Especially in light of this sentence:  "If this is considered a "crime" I have nothing more to say."  Is anyone willing to take on this challenge? --Takeel 21:08, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Lol, apparenly it was added by User:Ahmetcosar back in February.  I've replaced it with the original paragraph. —Khoikhoi 04:56, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I've removed the section. It contained no citations and looked to me like speculation. --Pixelface (talk) 22:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Identity of Serdar Argic" section needs cleanup 

message: Adoniscik and myself disagree over the use of the above words in the opening sentence of the article. The disputed phrase occurs in a wikilik to Denial of the Armenian Genocide, which uses the word denial rather than refute (the latter can mean disprove - I am unaware of any proof in Serdar Argic's postings). The Serdar Argic FAQ claims that he indulged in personal attacks, claiming that Armenians were responsible for genocide against Turks, amongst others. Can anyone help resolve this dispute? Autarch (talk) 17:26, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Refute' vs. 'Disprove'

message: Some of you may wish to participate in the discussion on renaming the category Armenian Genocide deniers to Armenian Genocide skeptics. The discussion is  here. --Anthon.Eff (talk) 18:18, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename of Category

message: Why not just reference it in a Usenet page? This is hardly worth noting. I'm ashamed that I have to actually post this - there's no reason to keep this but not keep any of the retarded drivel that drains out of /b/. (Keep in mind, I wholeheartedly agree that barely anything that has ever been a meme deserves a Wikipedia page.) 173.19.224.252 (talk) 22:37, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This hasn't been deleted? 

message: http://www.reddit.com/r/worstof/comments/k83k7/possible_botcontrolled_account_that_makes_long/
The account will probably be deleted before long, but still interesting.   Aar  ►  07:26, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's gone now.  Elassint Hi 00:55, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  relevant? 

message: Let me get this straight:  This article is about a fictitious persona and that fictitious persona is categorized as an Armenian Genocide Denier.  This makes Serdar Argic a fictitious genocide denier.  That means there is no real person actually denying the Armenian Genocide, in which case this article does not belong to the category of Armenian Genocide Deniers.  Correct me if I am wrong? Maybe I sound flippant in saying this but I just want to demonstrate the ridiculousness of creating wikipedia articles for the biographies of made-up personalities.  Who is to say that the person behind the fictituous persona even believes these things?  This article is worse than neighborhood gossip!
---Vikiyazar (talk) 21:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is about a real person who used a pen name on USENET. That person's real name is pretty well known, actually. (He lived in Minnesota at the time.) Jonathunder (talk) 02:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a lot of misinformation in this discussion about Serdar Argic. I would like to address these issues and have slanderous remarks about myself removed, as well as the reference to Jaedworks article which has this stupid claim about me being part of secret police, whatever that means. ACosarTR (talk) 10:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictitious Armenian Genocide Denier