Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Kent/Article Improvement

message: #Kent (obviously) - Olive Oil -ŢάĽɮ - 08:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That was a nifty bit of thinking. Lets make Feb 19th to 25th Kent as a trial collaboration of the week. We all should visit the Kent article to make either amendments or comments.  Plus, we need to come up with a message for the other members who may not be reading this notice. If we agree. then we can think about spamming some non-member editors, and advertise on the UK project pages MortimerCat 10:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you going to post this today, on members talk pages, in preparation? - Olive Oil -ŢάĽɮ - 10:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, I'll do it sometime this afternoon. Do you think we need our logo? MortimerCat 10:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the logo would be good for the "corporate" image - Olive Oil -ŢάĽɮ - 14:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I was hoping you would add the logo :) MortimerCat 15:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nominations

message: :That was a nifty bit of thinking. Lets make Feb 19th to 25th Kent as a trial collaboration of the week. We all should visit the Kent article to make either amendments or comments.  Plus, we need to come up with a message for the other members who may not be reading this notice. If we agree. then we can think about spamming some non-member editors, and advertise on the UK project pages MortimerCat 10:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you going to post this today, on members talk pages, in preparation? - Olive Oil -ŢάĽɮ - 10:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, I'll do it sometime this afternoon. Do you think we need our logo? MortimerCat 10:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the logo would be good for the "corporate" image - Olive Oil -ŢάĽɮ - 14:07, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I was hoping you would add the logo :) MortimerCat 15:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trial collaboration

message: Hi fellow Wikipedian,
We noticed that you have edited Kent related articles, you may have already seen Kents Portal and the Kent project. We are looking for active members to take part in the project and are planning a small drive on the Kent article this week, 19th to 25th Feb. All we are asking is for members to read the page and talk page carefully. After digesting that information, then we would like them to make one edit.
This edit can be to either the main article or to the talk page. Something as small as a spelling, grammar or punctuation correction is all we are asking. Alternatively, make suggestions on the talk page. Which sections need a rewrite, is the section order logical, are there any questionable facts. Anything!  In the words of Wikipedia, BE BOLD. 
Please join us.
What do you think? - Olive Oil -ŢάĽɮ - 15:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spam

message: I think the drive was successful, we had 4 out of the 7 members making changes, and the number of edits increased from the previous week. 
My suggestion for March is to have Kent as a collaboration of the Month. Each week (Mon to Sun) we can concentrate on a particular subject. For example "Sorting out the historical divisions", "Cite Source Week", "Choosing more pictures". 
On Sunday, mail our members telling them about next weeks theme. On Friday, send reminders to non-contributors. 
We can send out adverts to non-members at the beginning of the month, telling them about the months collaboration. However, I would suggest we take some care in choosing these non-members, not just extracting them from the history. Only "spamming" those who are actively editing Kent based articles. This will save us time unnecessarily annoying those who are not interested in Kent. MortimerCat 19:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - Olive Oil -ŢάĽɮ - 01:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kent Drive debriefing 

message: I've created the template , instructions, and its Categorys, I think this can supersede the  and  templates for use on every Kent-related articles Talk page. I think we should have another collaboration aimed at categorising all of the related pages. Ultimately this will help us focus on the priority articles and improving the most important. - Olive Oil -ŢάĽɮ - 08:47, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved to  due to change in interpretation of WP: prefix. Gimmetrow 07:27, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kent-related articles 

message: Hi fellow WikiProject Kent Member, you may have already seen this on our Kent Article Improvement talk page. We are planning a small drive on the Kent related articles this week, 18th to 25th March, to grade and categorise them. 
*All we are asking is, as you read/edit a Kent related page, for you digest the information, then add the template  to the top of the articles talk page. Instructions are available on the Project page or template page. 
*Please try to grade according to the guidelines to enable us to prioritise future work.
*After saving the template, add comments in the section created by the template.
- Olive Oil -ŢάĽɮ - 14:11, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaboration 18th - 25th March 2007 

message: Hello again WikiProject Kent Member, following our collaboration to tag Kent-related articles, we have ear marked 931 articles as being Kent related, however, as of the 26th March, 137 articles are still to be assessed.
*Could you please look at any, some or even one  of the 137 unassessed articles and change the  template, on the talk page, to a "class=Stub/Start or B category". 
*Please try to grade according to the guidelines to enable us to prioritise future work.
Kentarticles	Kentarticles	Importance	Importance	Importance	Importance	Importance	Importance
Kentarticles	Kentarticles	          	          	          	          	          	Total
Quality     	            	          	          	          	          	          	
Quality     	            	          	          	1         	          	          	1
Quality     	            	          	          	1         	          	          	1
Quality     	            	          	          	1         	          	          	1
Quality     	            	          	3         	4         	6         	          	13
Quality     	            	1         	12        	49        	137       	2         	201
Quality     	            	          	5         	17        	552       	3         	577
Quality     	            	1         	20        	73        	695       	5         	794
Quality     	            	0         	2         	5         	130       	0         	137
Quality     	Total       	1         	22        	78        	825       	5         	931
- Olive Oil -ŢάĽɮ - 01:45, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Results

message: need info for homework urgent question 1 visitor numbers from 1938 to 1948
   question 2 visitor demographic,s (EG.boy,girl,fameles,from perticular eareas)and how thay have changed over the years.
     "      3 visitor numbers now 
            4 how has sissinghurst gardens adapted to cope with higher visitor numbers and how do they aviod damage  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.110.73 (talk) 15:07, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  sissinghurst castle