lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wy'east

message: "According to local native legend, Wy'east (WHY east) was a chief of the Multnomah peoples who loved a beautiful maiden named Loo-wit. Klickitat, chief of the Klickitat tribe, also loved her.
:Loo-wit had brought fire back to the Multnomah and Klickitat peoples. The Great Spirit commanded her to light a fire on the stone bridge across what we now call the Columbia River to help restore warmth and light to the tribes who had fallen into a long season of wrongdoing. The stone bridge was supposed to be a symbol of peace between the warring peoples.
:Time passed and Loo-wit could not decide which of the handsome young chiefs she liked better, Wy'east or Klickitat, so the two chiefs began to quarrel. The Great Spirit became angry at the squabbling chiefs. He dashed the stone arch into the river, and turned Wy'east into Mt. Hood in northwest Oregon and Klicktat into Mt. Adams in southwest Washington. Loo-wit became Washington's Mt. St. Helens. The trio are still said to be angry with one another expressed by volcanic activity."
That's what you get when us white people start improvising on Native American themes... Wetman 00:57, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Red Meat (comic strip)

message: "Bizarre" "tasteless" "twisted" "dark" "funny" ... that describes pretty much every comic strip featured in alt weeklies and college papers! A little more detail about the strip would be nice (e.g., does it have recurring characters - does it have a standard setting, and if so what is it? etc.) This shouldn't be a fan site.  DavidWBrooks 01:22, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added some more to the character list (and will probably do more in the future)... but... while I agree there is a place for that information on the page, do we want it there?
Most of the fun is discovering the characters and their behaviour. Reading what is at best a 2 or 3 line summary will only disappoint, and probably won't match the off-beat humour that is Red Meat.
I'm undecided. What say you all?
81.107.198.21 04:06, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is a online encyclopedia., not an advertisement or review site for any movie, book, or comic strip.  The information here should be as complete, but concise as possible. If it's appropriate to have a character list, then any and all recurring characters should be listed. Chrisirwin (talk) 14:15, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thanks, Chrisirwin, for weighing in on a completely unrelated point. Should we be worried about whether or not Wikipedia is an advertisement or review site for any movie, book, or comic strip, we'll know who to ask. You might have missed the question, so here it is again, and a few more : Do we want, or need, a character list? Which characters? All of them? There aren't that many. Just the important ones? Which ones are the important ones? The recurring ones? All but a handful recur. Should the description be dry, or should it (attempt to) distil the humour of the strip? 82.26.18.62 (talk) 21:13, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters. 

message: Maybe a list of newspapers that print the comic might be of use.. shows that the comic has some actual followers.
cs302b  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.176.136.25 (talk) 08:46, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newspaper listing? 

message: Web site last updated on May 23 2023.
Has something happened to Max? 173.180.228.131 (talk) 17:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ceased.
Talk:Almanor, California

message: Um, what is the correct number, It was changed to 0 from a huge number.  I reverted it, Now looking at the two numbers witch is correct?  --  Quinwound 01:29, Mar 23, 2004 (UTC)
None of the town is covered by water? Could that be wrong, and the truth being it all covered by water? I heard a local legend (near Chester, CA) that Alamnor is an innundated town, at the bottom of Lake Almanor.  Supposedly the town graveyard was relocated to higher ground, and until the 1970's, boaters on the lake could still see sunlight glint off the town's tin roofs...
:There was no such town as "Almanor" before there was a lake, as that name was created specifically for the reservoir.   Any buildings underwater are part of pre-lake Prattville or buildings on the various ranches throughout the valley.  Kmmontandon 04:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:What Do You Know, Deutschland?

message: I say leave the first two open, since they're actually different, and keep the last two closed, because they have nothing new.  I know the last two are the more commonly known, but I figure we should go chronologically. <B>—Torchiest</B> talkedits 23:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that seems reasonable. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 06:44, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tracklists
Talk:Angst (KMFDM album)

message: I know for a fact that ADAW came out before Angst, and I have numerous pieces of evidence to back that up.  First of all, I became a KMFDM fan shortly after Money came out, and remember their "Sucks Money" tour in late 1992.  I clearly recall being extremely excited about ADAW, because it was the first truly "new" material they'd released since I'd started listening to them, as I already had their entire backcatalogue.  Second, consider that Blood was an older track, and the version on ADAW was the one originally slated to be released on the aborted Apart album.  Third, look at the cover art for ADAW, Angst, and Light.  You can see a clear progress in the "story" of those three covers, with ADAW first, Angst second, and Light third.  206.180.38.20 (talk) 21:05, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: All of these "pieces of evidence" are subjective original research, and therefore are irrelevant to these two articles. Even your own edit summaries confirm that you don't know when this CD was actually released, you're just guessing (partially corrected?). Until a reliable source shows otherwise, I'll remove the date entirely. The date should not be re-added without a source. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 21:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Amazon.com lists it as September 23rd, 1993.  Where did the December date come from in the first place?206.180.38.20 (talk) 21:40, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Also, how are any other dates legitimate?  They are all lacking reliable sources as well.206.180.38.20 (talk) 21:56, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, Amazon is a reliable source, so this time add in the date and give it a reference. Your edits looked like original research until now, which is why I reverted them, as everything I had seen (admittedly from unreliable sources) claimed Dec 20, and there seemed to be no good reason to change the dates (it's rare that more than one single comes out before an album). When adding this sort of data, you should always source it, instead of relying on subjective (and who knows how reliable) memories. (Really, it would be nice if Sascha would update the KMFDM discography pages to include the day and month of each release.) MrMoustacheMM (talk) 22:01, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  I really do remember it coming out beforehand, because a friend who worked at a music wholesaler got me an advance copy of the ADAW, and when Angst came out later, I thought it was weird that it also included Sucks, which had been out for a year already, and had seemed like another orphan single, apropos of our discussion about Split.206.180.38.20 (talk) 22:25, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, I trust that you remember correctly, it's just the whole "source" thing. I've added a ref to those 3 pages for that date. I left a message on your talk page. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 22:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ''A Drug Against War'' release date
Talk:Symbols (album)

message: Back around 2001 I believe, the official KMFDM website had the name of Symbols listed as ANGER. http://web.archive.org/web/20000525031722/www.kmfdm.net/page/anger.html
This was also back when the official site was supposedly being edited by Sacha K. himself. Why he put the name Anger there is mostly up to speculation, but it certainly does add evidence for a third name of the Symbols album.
The title can also be expressed in Unicode special characters: ✹☠💣🌀👊 Schedulezero (talk) 22:58, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Album Title 
Talk:Agogo (album)

message: is this song the same as the similarly titled track on Angst? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pandemias (talk • contribs) 21:22, 15 June 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  hole in the wall 
Talk:MDFMK

message: Why is the image MDFMK.jpg not used here, even though it exists and all that? Graue 10:17, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album image 

message: What year did the MDFMK album come out?  When did all this happen?  I actually don't know the answers; I was browsing this article for information.
HXcGeek 06:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Late response, but 2000. --Etni3s 10:12, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year? 

message: I've expanded the page to include discography, an info box, and external links. I also reorganized the page by adding a header for "history". Please let me know if anything on the page was done improperly or feel free to correct it yourself.
The article could use some more clean-up in terms of the info box and the discography section to include pictures. Your help is appreciated!
Also a couple notes in question. Since KMFDM regrouped in 2002, I listed MDFMK's duration from 2000-2002, although I have no evidence to provide that would support it other than what was said earlier. And another thing was that KMFDM's Discography for MDFMK doesn't list the third member mentioned in the history section?
Anyways, removed the stub tag. I doubt anybody is going to read this discussion forum for a while, but whatever. --Etni3s 10:19, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub Removal and Page Expansion 

message: This page needs a lot of work.  It has only one reference, for what is admittedly almost a piece of trivia.  The history needs a serious expansion, and I know they did a lot of touring in Japan.  It would be nice to be able to add information about that. <B>Torchiest</B> (talk | contribs) 05:33, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion and references 

message: I don't understand the use of the phrase, "what is now commonly referred to as 'electronica'". The term electronica was already in common use by the mid to late nineties, prior to the release of the MDFMK album. phreakydancin (talk) 20:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electronica? 
Talk:Testimony (Volkov book)

message: Tha article, at the moment, expansively deals with the question of Testimony's authenticity. There is nothing about the actual content of the book. -- megA (talk) 14:02, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the book itself 

message: Ho and Feofanov are at it again, and getting cited on this page for their 2011 publication. If I may point out a basic error that has showed up in this article:
Ho and Feofanov claim that Laurel Fay in 2002 examined the "Heikinheimo typescript," and that this typescript differed considerably from the original typescript. Nevertheless, Ho and Faeofanov say they examined the Heikinheimo typescript on April 25, 1999 (SW 61). Fay quite clearly states what she examined: a copy of the typescript in the Shostakovich family archives in Moscow. Ho and Feofanov ask questions about the provenance of the typescript Fay examined and quote an anonymous source. The Shostakovich Family Archives is a place in Moscow. Ho and Feofanov could go there and compare the typsecripts themselves.
Furthermore, truly useful scholarship would catalog the differences in the typescripts. Instead Ho and Feofanov circumvent the point and leave everything to mere conjecture instead of research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TotalFailure (talk • contribs) 22:14, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Shostakovich Wars

message: Heidemann is stated to have been a communist spy in this article, whereas it seems that his working for the Stasi was never confirmed, and only ever alleged. If there is no conclusive evidence on this point, this article should be changed, and if there is then Heidemann's article needs to be revised.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:569:50DB:F700:CD76:FF0:E83A:C6D9 (talk) 05:31, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Gerd Heidemann

message: There are several unreferenced statements that have been tagged since December 2008. I'm going to make a brief search for supporting references, but I intend to remove those statements if none can be found. — James Estevez (talk) 17:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced material
Talk:Little Games

message: My Copy of this album is I believe a japanese release and it has many more songs and includes alternates of many and even a commercial for "Great Shakes"
Infact my two favorite songs from the album "You Stole My Love"  and "Think about it" aren't listed.  IMO these are some of the earliest true heavy metal songs and are somewhat historical 97.91.190.78 (talk) 06:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Songs?
Talk:Quebec (album)

message: Does anyone know why Claude Coleman Jr. apparently didn't play on this album? His absence on Quebec is conspicuous, since all of the touring band but him appeared on the record. Could be an interesting thing to include in the article. PNB (talk) 01:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where's Claude? 

message: The main reason I looked up this article in the first place is I wanted to know why the album is named "Quebec" (partly because I'm going to be travelling to Montreal soon). There's no mention of it, does anyone have any insight here? - 173.212.101.126 (talk) 21:02, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This album is a style parody of some styles such as Pink Floyd, and the spacier songs like "Captain" seem to be in the same vein as Radiohead; perhaps Freeman and Melchiondo wanted to show some shades of Thom Yorke for this album. 2603:6000:C305:78DF:1C85:A83E:C6FF:D0E3 (talk) 22:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  origin of title
Talk:Elephant (album)

message: Does Pitchfork Media really need to be italicized?
Luke 19:00, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so. Jogers (talk) 19:05, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Citation 5 has a dead link, and I believe is meant to reference David Fricke, not David "Fridge." I believe it should be the same as citation 12. I cannot find an article in Rolling Stone called "Living Color," however, the last lines of David Fricke's review (the one used for citation 12) are "But with Elephant, their blues now come in living color." Is it safe to assume this should be corrected? It has been recited on other sites due to what appears to be a typo. Pedialight (talk) 21:32, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Issue 
Talk:White Blood Cells

message: The text says "bass quitar", but it CAN'T BE, since there is no bass in The White Stripes. All parts that REALLY sound like bass - such as the intro riff of "Seven Nation Army" - are actually just guitar with a dropped tuning.
*Actually, Jack uses an octave pedal to get his guitar to sound like a bass. --Thebends 22:45, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Rolling Stone is a magazine and should be italicized. Jogers (talk) 20:16, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 23:34, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: Why is this considered their magnum opus? Both Elephant and Icky Thump debuted at No.1 in the UK Charts. White Blood Cells was given 3-and-a-half stars by Rolling Stone magazine, where as Elephant recieved 5. Opinions should not be put on Wikipedia, especially wrong ones.
: Opinions by definition cannot be right or wrong. Especially in the case of what an artist's Magnum opus is, staunch objectivity is impossible. The charts and Rolling Stone magazine aren't the be all end all either. Zazaban (talk) 22:51, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magnum opus? 

message: I edited "rave-ups redolent of mid-'60s rock ("You're Pretty Good Looking") to " out of the music subsection because that track is actually on De Stijl, not sure what it was doing here. 84.157.181.12 (talk) 17:47, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  You're Pretty Good Looking 
Talk:Astro-Creep: 2000

message: As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this new article looking back at White Zombie's Astro-Creep: 2000, particularly its first single, "More Human Than Human." However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the review and—if he or she sees fit—post it as an external link on this page. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! 2008Mike harkin (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External Link suggestion: Article about "More Human Than Human" 

message: The genres listed for this album conflict with the genres listed in the White Zombie article. --JHP (talk) 15:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre 
Talk:My Generation (album)

message: Changed "as the band progressed in style and maturity" to "as the band changed in style and maturity" - the phrasing is pretty bad now (I'll fix it later), but it's better than the POV "progressed".  I wouldn't complain about "progressed" if I didn't disagree - in my opinion, TWSMG was the height of the Who's style, before Townshend was allowed to reign unchallenged and unchecked.  If I were a POV pusher, I'd switch "progressed" to "declined", but I'm not, so we'll have to go with "changed".  Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 21:45, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's now "changed styles and matured", which works a bit better. Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 21:46, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV removal

message: Is the deluxe edition in stereo? --81.165.193.157 13:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Regrettably, yes. That's why it's so different - a lot of the 1965 overdubs were put directly onto the master tape that was used to prepare the stampers. BTLizard (talk) 16:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stereo

message: I posted the cover of this album some time ago, scanned it four tines and them joined the four together - took a lot of work, copyrighted it as an album cover, and now it is gone.  What gives? Carptrash 04:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: So where did the cover go?

message: Is it to reflect the drug use during that time?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.109.115.46 (talk) 01:06, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the story that's been told. It's also been said that it was cold in the studio. Who knows what was the reason at the time? I suspect that Daltrey just thought it sounded good and all the rest is post facto. BTLizard (talk) 16:59, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why do they stutter in the song?

message: WP:REDLINK states that wikilinks to articles that do not yet exist are appropriate where notability is likely. Given that articles have existed at those song locations for many years, this certainly seems to be the case here. Further, if editors believe those songs aren't notable, they should probably be taken to AfD, not redirected without any discussion given the objections of multiple editors. ~ RobTalk 22:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits redirecting song articles here and removing wikilinks 

message: Can we get the new super deluxe edition added to the discography? Rayfromtexas123 (talk) 05:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 2016 Super Deluxe Edition addition

message: I LOVE Nicky Hopkins but what tracks did he actually play piano on? I doubt MY GENERATION would be one of them. Please list or at least add titles on whick track he played on please. Thank you. :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:554E:7801:2DF1:A8C3:6F3E:D9E5 (talk) 15:22, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicky Hopkins
Talk:Lists of DC Comics characters

message: Erm. Forgive me, but if we will point out former and present identites taken by various characters, that forces us to list separate characters with the same name (i.e. Spoiler was the fourth Robin). Thus, I did some. Feel free to contest this.
Apostrophe 05:54, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiple identities

message: Uhh does anyone think the dc section is way too large?  After all this is what you would expect from a comics history of over 70 years.  I propose to edit the dc section with caps.   What if marvel section gets that large?  32kb is the max quota.  Even Marvel section has 37kb. This has whopping 45.    AND their are different Aliases (characters were called something different in certain times.) To User:Lowellian who deleted updated lists of characters:  Was going to list as categorized below. Thanks will make sure NOT to finish webpage editing for DCU.  I hope more new, hip, characters be added in years to come to make large.  Very inaccurate, inconcise list of characters from 70 years. Good luck.User:Marvelvsdc
Should policy change only be for the characters whom are a part of the dc universe?  For instance, have a character who is exclusive to the dc universe appear as is the case with marvel's ultraverse series appearing in dc continuity.  Take the references of the shows from DCAU out unless they appeared in that continuity eg Harley Quinn would be added but Dollface would not.  That would reduce the size drastically.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asfd666 (talk • contribs) 14:25, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Size of article

message: ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.138.107.174 (talk) 15:57, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  how may are they? 

message: Should add a list of all dead characters  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.1.111.113 (talk) 02:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death list 

message: There should be a list dedicated to heroes (and villains) without powers.2601:346:C201:60C0:A4D0:DC87:6C54:392C (talk) 00:06, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New category? 

message: Should the character(s) called Disruptor be added to the list? This is relevant to the ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 20#Disruptor (comics). – Uanfala (talk) 12:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should Disruptor be added?
Talk:Berlin, Wisconsin

message: Personally, and to fit in with existing format, I think the names of those two places called Berlin in Wisconsin should be identified as Berlin, Green Lake County, Wisconsin and [Berlin, {blank} County, Wisconsin]. I say "(blank)" because it's not clear from the Wikipedia entry which county the second place is in.  They both have between 1,000 and 5,500 people, so it's difficult to know which is supposed to be the "town" and which is supposed to be the "city."  When there are two places with the same name in one state, they are generally disambiguated by their county name, on Wikipedia.  Moncrief 02:28, Mar 23, 2004 (UTC)
:I just posted about this topic on my user page; they ARE in the same county :).  Bamos 02:37, 23 Mar 2004 (UTC)

message: This one is trickier than it seeems. There is one city of Berlin, but it extends into two counties. There are also two separate towns of Berlin. So we could see Berlin City in Green Lake or Waushara Counties (although Green Lake is primary, it just grew). We do see Berlin Town in Marathon and Green Lake Counties. I'll start tring to shift an link that pages. See further discussion at Talk:List of Wisconsin towns Lou I 06:19, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorting them out 