lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:LGBT rights in Bhutan

message: Material in the summary that has no references, and has not content supporting in the main body of the article, can be deleted.  Please make sure that sentences added to the lede, are referenced and reflect material that is in the main article. thanks. Britishfinance (talk) 12:13, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Note to editors

message: It seem it finally got legalised by the parliament , although it still need the upper chamber vote and royal assent. --Aréat (talk) 21:56, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Légalisation of homosexuality
Category talk:Zimbabwean footballers

message: i think for the national team our coaches should take a quick look at a name like eusebio manwere thats the kind of talent we might be lacking lets give room for youngstars he has a few caps for the national team and currently playing out of zim  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.74.239.201 (talk) 08:50, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Central Catholic High School (Massachusetts)

message: Nice start, refs would be good. Lists are not encouraged. More pics/text? Victuallers 12:12, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: I'm sure USD 10,800 seems like a lot to some people, but in light of national Catholic high school tuition rates and the school's location, it's actually rather unremarkable. If one thinks that's "astronomical", then one is in for a rude awakening when one starts shopping colleges.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.221.242.122 (talk) 22:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  tuition hyperbole 

message: Currently marked as unreferenced. I think this would probably provide a reference, but cannot access it (geographically blocked). Tacyarg (talk) 18:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards section 

message: In the history section, for 2010, the last name of our principal, Keller, is misspelled as "Killer"
Cgputney (talk) 20:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: signed, Willondon (talk)  20:42, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of Principal is misspelled
Talk:LGBT rights in Uzbekistan

message: @ ; @: I have left most of the wording, but added a little more context. I still think it does not belong in infobox as they are not legal penalties, but at least they are well sourced. Please consider carefully before changing back to your preferred version, as I've really tried to take your view on board. The way it is now, it explains  about the violence, and is clearer to read. Please, would you be kind enough to talk about it here? [Note, though, I have left out "vigilante executions" as these are not sourced. "Murders" and "hate crimes" are better, more accurate descriptors.]
(I did not remove the legislation cite, either now or the previous time you said I had. It is above the blockquote, which is the WP:MOS recommendation. LMH's edit in June meant there were 2 copies of the same source: one formatted above, and one unformatted below.) 
Thanks. AukusRuckus (talk) 08:27, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits in infobox

message: @: I have reverted your edits as the section you refer to, § 121, deals only with rape by coercion; sexual assaults must not in any way be conflated with same-sex sexual activity. It's unbearably hurtful for some people to have these concepts muddled. More important for WP, though, it's false information in the article.  No reliable source cited states sexual acts between females are criminalised in Uzbekistan (although they do face discrimination). AukusRuckus (talk) 09:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Law on rape: not about lesbianism
Talk:Araucaria tit-spinetail

message: Doesn't look like we can get one at Flickr right now; the only one of this species is here, but the uploader doesn't want to release. Richard001 (talk) 00:49, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Got one now. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 20:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Podilsko-Voskresenska Line/Archive 0

message: Greetings, Parties, and thank you for agreeing to become involved in this Mediation. Such an action demonstrates that you are all willing to bring an end to this dispute, and thus are working for the good of Wikipedia - again, thank you.
For those of you who have not came across me around the encyclopedia yet, I'm AGK, although in conversation Anthony is fine. As one of the newest members of the Mediation Committee, I operate quite differently from other Mediators: my style of operation is to divide Mediation into three "stages" (as well as a fourth, initial stage which we're beginning right now) ... inventively named, Mediation Stages 1, 2 and 3  each of these will help establish what each party wants (as well as exp, give each party an oppurtunity to explain why they think what they want should be implemented, and finally allow each party to put forward proposals for a solution to this dispute.
First, however, we need to agree on the Mediation Location (see below), and to allow any further parties to be put forward. In the meanwhile, any questions should be directed to me at my talk page; if you wish for a more private means of contact, details of getting in touch with me are available at my contact page.
Kind regards,Anthøny (talk) 13:03, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: ===Mediation Location Poll===
This section is a brief strall poll to determine consensus over where the Mediation is to be undertaken. Parties please sign under one heading only.
====This page====
Mediation is undertaken on this page; the page is kept archived and organised by the Mediator, and is accessible to any registered or anonymous user. Please sign below if you wish for Mediation to be undertaken on this page:
#--Hillock65 13:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mediation Stage 0 

message: This section is a brief strall poll to determine consensus over where the Mediation is to be undertaken. Parties please sign under one heading only.
====This page====
Mediation is undertaken on this page; the page is kept archived and organised by the Mediator, and is accessible to any registered or anonymous user. Please sign below if you wish for Mediation to be undertaken on this page:
#--Hillock65 13:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mediation Location Poll

message: Mediation is undertaken on this page; the page is kept archived and organised by the Mediator, and is accessible to any registered or anonymous user. Please sign below if you wish for Mediation to be undertaken on this page:
#--Hillock65 13:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This page
Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Podilsko-Voskresenska Line/Archive 1

message: *Comment – It has been noted before that trilingual websites (in English, Ukrainian and Russian) cannot serve as a proof of bilingual status of Kyiv or the country as a whole. If that logic is applied, than English would be the third official language and in our case should also be reflected in station names. This is not the case and this is a false logic. In deciding the status of the Russian language it is better to consult the Constitution of Ukraine, where only Ukrainian is listed as an official state language. Russian does not have any status whatsoever. Not in the country, not in the capital. Even though the president's and the city government's sites are trilingual, Ukrainian is the only official working language in the country and in the capital. --Hillock65 21:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In regards to the number of Russian speakers, let's look at the figures of the latest census: According to the latest census (2001), among Kiev residents, 2,111 thousand (82.2%) identified themselves as Ukrainians, 337 thousand (13.1%) - Russians, and 120 thousand (4.7%) - other nationalities. . Among Ukrainians, 85.2% named Ukrainian language as the native language, and 14.8% called Russian language as native. Among Russians, 95.9% listed Russian as native, and 3.9% - Ukrainian. . The numbers for Ukraine are essentially similar. ,. So, claims of majority of Russian speakers are not supported by the available data. --Hillock65 21:43, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Anaplastic large-cell lymphoma

message: doi:10.1111/bjh.13958 Br J Haem JFW | T@lk 05:56, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 
Talk:Wistow, North Yorkshire

message: Wistow village website at wistow-village.com  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.148.160.181 (talk) 12:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - I have added the link to the article page. Keith D (talk) 12:28, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connecting to the future
Talk:Bittern Line

message: The Bittern Line does use Class 170 trains from time to time, especially in the evenings. They're certainly more common than the Class 153 trains which are rarely used. CarFan1234 (talk) 20:21, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trains

message: Does anyone (eg: ) know why the line didn't close in the 1960s? I checked the Hansard archives, expecting a report from November 1969 by Fred Mulley as hinted by the existing source, explaining why the line was kept open. There's a related report here that explains why closure of the Marshlink line stalled (and subsequently never happened), but nothing involving Norwich - Cromer - Sheringham. I know that at the time, North Norfolk was a Labour / Tory marginal and nobody would have advocated closure for a genuine fear of losing their seat, but I don't have a source for that. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for not closing
Talk:Burmese Buddhist Temple (Singapore)

message: Not a "Burmese" Buddhist Temple. You aren't entitled to a general name much in the same way as Catholic Church in the Philippines can't call themselves Catholic Church, although locally known as such. This is not a Singlish Wikipedia. Outside of Singapore, nobody cares. So, stop moving. SSH remoteserver (talk) 00:09, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's a temple in Singapore
Talk:Kate Isitt

message: Or just publicity?
Was she born? When?
In a place? Where?
Did she have parents? Who?
Siblings? Who?
Spouse / partner? Who?
Was she educated? Where? When?
Etc.
Articles that are bare publicity and devoid of other information don't belong in an encyclopaedia.
Presumably Wikipedia aspires to be regarded an actual encyclopaedia but fall short as long as it allows such empty articles. 86.142.227.60 (talk) 09:25, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographical article?
Talk:Thai Prophecy Verse

message: As far as the article is concerned, the full text should not be included unless it is very short and does not constitute the bulk of the article. This is something we have been working on in the poetry project for some time, and a standard we have agreed upon. While our standards are not uniform across WP, it is something that is addressed in WP:Style.Mrathel (talk) 16:00, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Youth organizations in Communist Czechoslovakia

message: Sokols were disbanded in 1948, same year as the creation of the two main youth organisations. Does anybody knows a bit more about what has been conserved from the sokol methods and so forth? I'm writing the French sokol article and this part is still too thin in my stub :)
Regards
--Bombastus 13:15, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:List of gymnastics flips

message: This page is a laugh, it was probabaly written by 10 year old. Lots of the stuff here is misleading and wrong.
This page needs CONTEXT. Is this specifically gymnastics or what? —Quasirandom 19:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: moved to List of gymnastics flips so it has context.  RJFJR (talk) 05:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed all flips that are obviously not related to gymnastics. Now it is necessary to add the genuine flips into the article. Lambtron (talk) 07:08, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Needs a good deal of editing to rephrase in third person: references to "you doing something" should be removed.  RJFJR (talk) 05:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar/style

message: I'm sure this should be merged somewhere just not sure where. Ridernyc (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: There might be a US/UK terminology problem here. I have noticed a lot of kids now talk about doing "flips" on the trampoline when refering to front and back somersault which are not flips in the UK. In the UK a flip is distinct from a somersault in that a flip is a move which travels and rotation is generated from the shoulders, whereas a somersault is a static move in which rotation is generated from the hips. A back-flip in UK terminology refers to what an American would term a back-hanspring, which is a flip. A handspring is also a flip as is an aerial and a layout on floor. But tucked and piked somersaults are not flips and a straight back somersault on a trampoline is also not a flip.87.114.253.187 (talk) 13:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand what you mean when you say that rotation is "generated from the shoulders" (or hips). Can you be more concise? Lambtron (talk) 15:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology problem?

message: What about back flips? Shouldn't we mention them? Or are they already mentioned somehow? —Kri (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I expanded on this in Classifications section. IMO it's best not to include front and back variations for every possible type of flip in the List below, otherwise it will become nearly twice as long without conveying a commensurate amount of additional knowledge. Lambtron (talk) 22:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back flips?
Talk:Rezwana Chowdhury Banya

message: this text was in the article
 This article lacks year of birth, place of birth, early life, early education, musical style, personal life &c
--Melaen (talk) 02:59, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  moving comment to talk page
Talk:Arena Skövde

message: Should this really be in :Category:Ice hockey venues in Sweden? Can someone provide a source for this. --Bamsefar75 13:26, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could not find any statement on this page about Ice Hockey, so I removed the category. --Bamsefar75 13:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ice hockey venue? 
Talk:Georgia during Reconstruction

message: I do not think that this article should be merged with the general Reconstruction article. Ideally it will have details that the general survey should not provide.--Kenmayer 13:31, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2007

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:35, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: Why will no one address the Neo-Confederate propaganda nature of this article? Almost nothing in it is properly sourced. Has anyone actually read it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.178.252.13 (talk) 16:14, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the unreferenced, POV-pushing text.  It had been added by User:72.208.66.115 on August 6, 2015. Antony–22 (talk⁄contribs) 02:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: I took some time to update various citations that were missing. However, during review, I noticed a significant portion of this article is either a word-for-word or slightly modified copy of this article  from the New Georgia Encyclopedia. More work could be done to pull information from the primary sources linked in the encyclopedia entry.  DZappala95 (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed citations
Talk:IDAS (missile)

message: Surface-to-air missile type???? it's sea(submerged)-to-air missile...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by - - - (talk • contribs) 20:21, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

message: I would suggest that this page be merged with the parent page of IRIS-T due to the following reasons;
* This article is a stub
* This article has little or few references
* This article is more likely to be successful by merging with IRIS-T
The merge should be selective- it would also be better to verify some information through the process.
Jake M Ingram (talk) 15:01, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested Merge 

message: All the companies mentioned in the Designer section has taken part in designing and developing the system? Or actually one of them is designing, others are for manufacturing and bearing a cost? SReader21 (talk) 01:45, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Designer
Talk:William McDougall (psychologist)

message: You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of  Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by  suggesting new sources through comments on that page. It will be extremely helpful for articles on human intelligence to edit them according to the  Wikipedia standards for reliable sources for medicine-related articles, as it is important to get these issues as well verified as possible. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 15:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to Human Intelligence 

message: I seem to recall that McDougall wrote a chapter for Murchison's "A History of Psychology in Autobiography". Any one who has the full reference at hand is welcome to add it. 
ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:54, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion for a further reference
Talk:Colonial Assam

message: *Support the long-standing merge proposal from Assam Province, given that the scope of Colonial Assam covers this period and earlier periods. The combined page would be of reasonable size for a single page, and both pages would benefit from the additional context or information. Klbrain (talk) 22:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, closed the proposal (given the opposition), but linked the Colonial Assam page from the Assam Province#History with a template:main.  Klbrain (talk) 10:44, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Mangrove honeyeater

message: Just read the recent expansion by Sabine's Sunbird, shouldn't the Singing Honeyeater (Lichenostomus virescens) be the third part of the Superspecies, surely White-gaped is very different? (this is just a query, are there any refs available?) Aviceda  talk 05:28, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Dammit, good catch. You're right, got the wrong species. I'll correct it Sabine's Sunbird  talk 05:52, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superspecies?
Talk:Yellow-throated honeyeater

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Lichenostomus flavicollis stealing hair from Thylogale billardierii for nest - Melaleuca.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 27, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-02-27. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:36, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Lichenostomus flavicollis stealing hair from Thylogale billardierii for nest - Melaleuca.jpg]] to appear as POTD
Talk:Ringo Starr & His All-Starr Band

message: I know it's a lot of fun to predict the setlist.  At this moment, however, it's still 2009, and Ringo hasn't announced any shows yet.--Catpochi (talk) 05:19, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  2010 Show Setlist? 

message: I've removed a lot of unreferenced material from this article. I've also marked some material that is referenced to self-published websites. This material should also be removed if reliable sources aren't available. -- Mikeblas (talk) 23:31, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  unreferenced cleanup 

message: In the context of the band member history list, what does unabridged mean? Lambertman (talk) 13:49, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the "unabridged" bits, as it's unclear what that even means, and the editor who added them appears to have a history of dubious edits. Trivialist (talk) 04:41, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  “unabridged”
Template talk:Home and Away

message: I was just wondering if it was about time that this template was split into two; one for the characters and one for the related articles (lists, music, awards, etc)? I think Home and Away's the only soap that I know of that still has one template and despite my initial reservations about the Neighbours one being split, I've grown to love the format. - JuneGloom  Talk 21:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been waiting for this moment. Lets make this happen. I have thought about when the best time to make the change would be. I think now is a good time. Totally my favourite suggestion on here of 2013.Rain the 1 22:21, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we kept it as it is because we had fewer articles. There weren't many past characters with their own pages and there was like two yearly lists. - JuneGloom  Talk 22:44, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

text: That was a bit fast. I was gonna wait for Skteosk to comment. - JuneGloom  Talk 23:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting the template
Talk:Screaming piha

message: If the Screaming Piha has brown plumage in both sexes, why does the picture show a blue bird? The picture is misleading.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.230.66.189 (talk) 15:48, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe the photo is of Black-billed Thrush (Turdus ignobilis), not Screaming Piha. The structure is wrong, as is the perch (I don't think a Piha would perch on a leafy branch like that) and the plumage (too much contrast between the throat/chest and back - Screaming Piha is much more uniform gray). Could someone please take it down?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.180.189.200 (talk) 20:05, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Identification
Talk:Generative topographic map

message: The following appears to contradict what is said in Self-organizing map about topology preservation."A key difference between the GTM and the SOM is that the nodes in the SOM can wander around at will; GTM nodes are constrained by the allowable transformations and the probabilities on those transformations. If the deformations are well-behaved the topology of the latent space is preserved.."
:Exactly which passage in SOM do you think contradicts the cited one?
:In the SOM the best-matching unit (BMU) is determined in each step/iteration. Consequently it can wander around in the sequence of learning iterations.
:Citation from Self-organizing map:
:'When a training example is fed to the network, its Euclidean distance to all weight vectors is computed. The neuron with weight vector most similar to the input is called the best matching unit (BMU).'  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.245.67.180 (talk) 14:45, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with Self-organizing map article 

message: I think that the comparison with SOM is a bit biased. Cited advantages are:
1-it explicitly formulates a density model over the data.
   Does this really constitutes an advantage? Why?
2-it uses a cost function that quantifies how well the map is trained.
   SOM also has its ways to quantify errors, namely the quantization error and the topographical error.
3-it uses a sound optimization procedure (EM algorithm).
   This may be the main (or the only one?) advantage of GTM over SOM. (EPleite (talk) 20:13, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biased comparison with SOM? 