lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Parliament of the Democratic Republic of the Congo

message: Cross Post
Should articles on DRC include the word "The" in their title? I'm thinking of National Assembly of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and others which have recently been moved. Personally I think yes they should, as this is what english speakers normally say (despite the general ban on articles in wikipedia). What do others think? AndrewRT(Talk) 21:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definite article 

message: Someone replaced the coat of arms picture with one that looks exactly the same, and added a rant in block capitals implying that the old one was some work of white racists.  In view of the fact that I can't tell the difference between the two, I wonder how one is racist and the other isn't. Uporządnicki (talk) 22:39, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racist/non-racist coat of arms exactly the same?
Talk:Senate (Democratic Republic of the Congo)

message: Cross Post
Should articles on DRC include the word "The" in their title? I'm thinking of National Assembly of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and others which have recently been moved. Personally I think yes they should, as this is what english speakers normally say (despite the general ban on articles in wikipedia). What do others think? AndrewRT(Talk) 21:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definite article
Talk:Monthly Comic Zero Sum

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: I want to add this site in Ex links.
http://83
1rec.blog99.fc2.com/blog-entry-39.html  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.221.248.237 (talk) 17:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That link is blacklisted, so it's impossible.--十八 22:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Link
Talk:Elementary physics formulae

message: This formula list still needs some (maybe many ?) comments to become what I would really like it to be : a basic aid for students. --npettiaux 21:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No point in any comments or units. This article is fully inferior in every way to the main articles list of physics formulae and laws of science (plus other equation-list articles). This article should just be blanked and redirected to list of physics formulae. Don't get me wrong - I appreciate the effort in creating this, but it's quite pointless to maintain or even keep anymore. F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑ici 20:56, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Fernando Peres

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Ted Hargreaves

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This didn't specify what needed cleanup, though it might be the preformatted career statistics chart which could be replaced with a table.  RJFJR (talk) 15:45, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Pingquan

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:19, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Alejandro González

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 22:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:List of Liberians

message: Who keeps putting in the names of people who had no connection to Liberians?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.248.172.238 (talk) 21:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Nordenfelt gun

message: I'm not entirely sure the Nordenfeldt should be classified as a machine-gun, in that it's manually operated (ie, not fully-automatic) and has multiple firing barrels. IMHO it's really more of a mechanical volley gun, so perhaps the article could be amended to reflect the fact it's not technically a machine-gun in the traditional sense? Commander Zulu (talk) 14:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. What tpo correctly call it has bothered me for a while. Rcbutcher (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Machine-gun?

message: That's 1,000 rounds per minute. That's twice the speed of a Maxim gun. Couldn't be. More like 300 rounds in 3 minutes. Rcbutcher (talk) 21:24, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "3,000 rounds of ammunition in 3 minutes and 3 seconds"
Talk:Wertheim

message: This page was formerly listed as belonging to the WikiProjects "Biography" and "Germany" . After cleanup efforts per WP:SU (edit before cleanup), it seems this page should be a disambiguation page). If you wish to write about about a certain Wertheim topic, create a new article and link to it from this dab page. (The newly created topic may of course be listed in other WikiProjects.) Accordingly, I have replaced the old WikiProject templates with a WikiProject Disambiguation template. – sgeureka t•c 12:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cramer family

message: Should we consider giving Addie her own entry in the "Supporting Characters" section for the show, since she is now sane and out in force, being seen regularly just like Carlotta (who is also in there)?  I think she deserves it.--Jbt1138 (talk) 03:29, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Upping Addie's status?

message: Anyone got a shot of Laura for the Cassie section?  It's not right to have Holly Gagnier there and not her. :)  Also, should I put all her material in present tense?Jbt1138 (talk) 03:41, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Laura Koffman

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cramer family. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20130629085322/http://beta.abc.go.com/shows/general-hospital/recaps/episode201303200 to http://beta.abc.go.com/shows/general-hospital/recaps/episode201303200
:Original page is not archived, link appears dead.— TAnthonyTalk 15:50, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked OK.— TAnthonyTalk 15:50, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 
Talk:Night Fall (Yin-Yang-Yo!)

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:24, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Transaction Capabilities Application Part

message: This article is misnamed - TCAP does not stand for Transaction Capabilities Application Part;  it stands for Transaction Capabilities.  A quick scan of Q.771 would show that! Page needs to be moved to its proper name.  86.144.170.33 21:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misnamed 

message: I also doubt that TCAP is an application layer on the OSI stack, even as SS#7 uses it;  TC-Users are the application layer, with TCAP providing more of a session service (layer 5) - begin, continue, end.   TCAP on its own doesn't provide any application services in an SS#7 network. 86.144.170.33 21:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Application Layer? 

message: The article mentions that TCAP is similar to TCP. Not really in the sense that TCP does not offer explicit 
transaction support, most of the signalling protocols that work over TCP (sip, diameter) implementing 
their own transaction mechanism. For example, in sigtran TCAP is still used over SCTP. Const.crist (talk) 19:52, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Where does it say that TCAP is similar to TCP? — Dgtsyb (talk) 21:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

text: have a look at the page Transaction Capabilities Application Part:  "Its primary purpose is to facilitate multiple concurrent dialogs between the same sub-systems on the same machines, using Transaction IDs to differentiate these, similar to the way TCP ports facilitate multiplexing connections between the same IP addresses on the Internet."  Differentiating between sub-systems is done using Signalling Connection Control Part. I have also seen that there are two TCAP entries in wikipedia: Transaction Capabilities Application Part and TCAP. imo TCAP should be removed (merged into the other one?). Const.crist (talk) 11:39, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  TCAP/TCP similarity?
Talk:Voyage to the Center of the Yo/ Sitting Shaggler

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Attack of the Vidiots/ Fit to be Tried

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Attack of the Lesson/ A Case of Evils

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Out on a Pledge/ Dojo Alone

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Doomed to Repeat It/ The Gig is Up

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:31, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Osman Hamdi Bey

message: I am surprised by this entry here.  Hamdi Bey was a quintessential Ottoman intellectual, a citizen of the empire, born Muslim, and served the Sultan loayally all his life.  What makes him Greek?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.77.162.23 (talk) 19:28, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  He was not Greek 

message: Whoever came with the explanation of Osman Hamdi Bey's motivation and idea behind the painting seems to have just made it up.  Obvious from the lack of any reference.  There is a more obvious messege in the painting.
:I assume the explanation on the The Tortoise Trainer is closer to what you think is the correct explanation. But neither article's content has any references. Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 20:31, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaplumbag Terbiyecisi 

message: "Girl with Pink Cap (June 1904)". Sorry but I fail to see a girl, is it the correct name for the picture?
190.215.86.135 (talk) 01:21, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange picture.
Talk:WTLS

message: Per the WP:Disambig page, "If only a primary topic and one other topic require disambiguation, then disambiguation links are sufficient, and a disambiguation page is unnecessary." Since the radio station call letters are the primary identification and the acronym for a security protocol is a secondary identification, a hat note is sufficient and requires no more steps than would a disambiguation page for people seeking the Wireless Transport Layer Security. - Dravecky (talk) 09:51, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rationale for deletion of disambiguation page

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 22:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Bad Nanny Jamma/ Pros and Cons

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Bushton, Kansas

message: Is it worth mentioning that this town is very close to the Geographic Center of Kansas? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 02:17, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographic Center of Kansas
Talk:Wubble in Paradise/ Dictator of the Year

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:33, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:The Yin of Yang/ Shopping Sprawl

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Scary Scary Quite Contrary/ How the Cookie Crumbles

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:A Match Not Made in Heaven/ The High She-as

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:35, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Tom Laidlaw

message: I propose removing the COI tag. A major contribution by the self-admitted subject of the article does not seem apparent. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:12, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "I am Tom Laidlaw. Someone is continually writing negative comments about me on my page. I have edited them in the past. I tried to edit some comments today but it appears I can't because I am not the administrator." So apparently sometimes the subject has been editing as an IP or under some other name. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 19:16, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be this edit I would guess. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:18, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

text:  Sorry didn't see this discussion but I just removed the tag. I had a look through the history and someone has indeed been adding unsourced negative information, from what I can see from the history it looks like the subject's edits have been to remove this. January (talk) 19:22, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He's still got a bad ownership problem here. I believe the tag should stay. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 19:31, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: He says all he's done is edit negative comments. I have had a look through the history and the only negative infomation that has ever been added to this article has been unsourced. All he seems to have done is revert BLP violations. WP:COI#Non-controversial edits lists deleting content that violates Wikipedia's BLP policy, so he hasn't breached WP:COI. January (talk) 19:45, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Punishing the subject with a COI tag for what looks like twice removing unsourced negative content seems like a gross overreaction to me. It is us who have failed the subject by allowing such material to remain so long in the first place. I am removing the tag, and will continue to do so unless someone shows me some clear evidence of the supposed ownership issue. Kevin (talk) 06:29, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay; but keep an eye on it. If he starts removing sourced negative information, I'll be able to say "I told you so"; if nothing of the sort happens, then you'll clearly have been right and I wrong. --Orange Mike  |  Talk 16:42, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag
Talk:Put on Your White Sombrero

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: What evidence is there that they would entitle a song Pig Party on Mallorca?  that sounds like a phrase that is used today not back then  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:7:8500:982:2932:C04D:101D:4D5D (talk) 21:39, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pit Party on Mallorca?  now really! 

message: The chord progressions of Sombrero and Cassandra are not similar.  Maybe the rhythm is the same.  Who ever claimed that the tracks arrangement was reused in Cassandra.  Has Benny or Bjorn ever claimed this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:7:8500:982:2932:C04D:101D:4D5D (talk) 21:53, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cassandra not the same
Talk:Wilson, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  12:30, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article
Talk:Kanopolis, Kansas

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
Sbmeirow (talk) 09:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Panther modern

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: http://everything2.com/index.pl?node=Panther%20Modern
Posted with the permission of Wintrmute http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1003879& —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DeKreeft27 (talk • contribs) 19:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information was pulled from Everything2
Talk:Eastmoreland Hospital

message: Built in about 1960 as Portland Osteopathic Hospital, by which name it was known until the 1970s.
I am told of an "old" Portland Osteopathic Hospital in NE, which was in existence in the 1950s. I have no idea when it was founded. I expect these were related. Jeffreykopp (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 08:11, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins
Talk:My Stupid Sword/ Neat Freak

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:The Trouble with Two-ni-corns / Scarf It Up!

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 21:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message