Talk:List of Grand Slam men's doubles champions

message: I find it amazing that there is no talk page discussion for this article.... ever!  No disagreements on formatting? colors? Anything?  I'm cool with it but it's hard to believe. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:43, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Amazing

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of Grand Slam men's doubles champions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071025005050/http://www.usopen.org/en_US/about/history/mdchamps.html to http://www.usopen.org/en_US/about/history/mdchamps.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This is bizarre.  So there is only one couple who have the GS in men's doubles but the way you read this the most important achievement is the career Golden Slam (all names linked so it looks nice too, even down to the nick names), and then McGregor and Sedgman get a mention (no name link though) but it's qualified by making clear about how great the Bryan's are.  I am holding back my inner McEnroe. Antipodenz (talk) 07:44, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introductory paragraph 

message: , there were discussions on the same subject on the singles' talk page, and all the reasoning presented there applies here, so ehat's your reasoning for having a different view on this issue here? ABC paulista (talk) 02:25, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: My issue is, it is pertinent to this article's scope, therefore it should remain here. If you are still adamant about removing at least move it elsewhere in a tennis article which it belongs, not outright remove it. Thank you very much. Qwerty284651 (talk) 02:27, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  It isn't pertinent here just as it's not pertinent on the single's article, the same reasoning applies for both lists. And it was already moved to the List of men's Grand Slam, Olympic and ATP Tour Finals and Masters Series doubles champions. ABC paulista (talk) 02:31, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @ABC paulista Oh, really? I had no idea it was moved. Well, at least it has been relocated somewhere, I guess. Better than being removed altogether. At least it exists in some tennis article...I am complacent with that. This topics I hereby declare closed. Over and out. Qwerty284651 (talk) 02:34, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Big titles Sweep 

message: === Three titles ===
{| class="wikitable"	Australian—French—Wimbledon	Australian—French—Wimbledon
1928    	Jacques Brugnon            	
1935    	Jack Crawford              	
1951▲   	Ken McGregor  Frank Sedgman	
1952    	Ken McGregor  Frank Sedgman	
1953    	Ken Rosewall Lew Hoad      	
Open Era	Open Era                   	
1998    	Jacco Eltingh§             	
2013    	Bob Bryan§ Mike Bryan§     	
=== Two titles ===
{| class="wikitable"	Australian—French         	Australian—French
1928‡   	Jacques Brugnon           	
1935‡   	Jack Crawford             	
1951▲   	Ken McGregor Frank Sedgman	
1952    	Ken McGregor Frank Sedgman	
1953‡   	Ken Rosewall Lew Hoad     	
1955    	Vic Seixas Tony Trabert   	
1958    	Ashley Cooper Neale Fraser	
1961    	Rod Laver                 	
1962    	Roy Emerson Neale Fraser  	
1967‡   	Tony Roche John Newcombe  	
Open Era	Open Era                  	
1973‡   	John Newcombe             	
1987‡   	Anders Järryd             	
1998‡   	Jacco Eltingh             	
2013‡   	Bob Bryan Mike Bryan      	
::::::::::::::::::::::::::OR
::::::::::In this version I added bgcolor just to the year cells and not the namespaces, as suggested. However, there are 3* questionable exceptions, which I just did not know how to deal with. Namely, 2-slam tables:
::::::::::# 2nd table: AO-WIM 1950 Bromwich 
::::::::::# 3rd table: AO-USO 1987 Jarryd
::::::::::# 4th table: FO-WIM 1998 Eltingh 
::::::::::All 3 have won 3 slams in said years, but with different partners. They are listed with the partner, alongside whom they won 2 titles, in such and such combo. BUT I did not know how to emphasize them besides adding a symbol. Maybe split the year, one highlighted with a symbol, the other plain; to avoid highlighting the namespace....I don't know. Just throwing ideas out there. Anyhow, this is the best I have got. Also, I am tagging , the participants in the previous discussion related to this one, to weigh in on the matter. Qwerty284651 (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiples titles in a season 

message: {| class="wikitable"	Australian—French         	Australian—French
1928‡   	Jacques Brugnon           	
1935‡   	Jack Crawford             	
1951▲   	Ken McGregor Frank Sedgman	
1952    	Ken McGregor Frank Sedgman	
1953‡   	Ken Rosewall Lew Hoad     	
1955    	Vic Seixas Tony Trabert   	
1958    	Ashley Cooper Neale Fraser	
1961    	Rod Laver                 	
1962    	Roy Emerson Neale Fraser  	
1967‡   	Tony Roche John Newcombe  	
Open Era	Open Era                  	
1973‡   	John Newcombe             	
1987‡   	Anders Järryd             	
1998‡   	Jacco Eltingh             	
2013‡   	Bob Bryan Mike Bryan      	
::::::::::::::::::::::::::OR
::::::::::In this version I added bgcolor just to the year cells and not the namespaces, as suggested. However, there are 3* questionable exceptions, which I just did not know how to deal with. Namely, 2-slam tables:
::::::::::# 2nd table: AO-WIM 1950 Bromwich 
::::::::::# 3rd table: AO-USO 1987 Jarryd
::::::::::# 4th table: FO-WIM 1998 Eltingh 
::::::::::All 3 have won 3 slams in said years, but with different partners. They are listed with the partner, alongside whom they won 2 titles, in such and such combo. BUT I did not know how to emphasize them besides adding a symbol. Maybe split the year, one highlighted with a symbol, the other plain; to avoid highlighting the namespace....I don't know. Just throwing ideas out there. Anyhow, this is the best I have got. Also, I am tagging , the participants in the previous discussion related to this one, to weigh in on the matter. Qwerty284651 (talk) 17:00, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two titles