lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fécamp Bible

message: I'm not sure that I understand the point of just cutting-and-pasting large amounts of data from the British Library website to Wikipedia! Anyone who just Googles 'fecamp bible' will find the entry on the BL website, with numerous images. If the BL updates/corrects their description of the MS, it will not be reflected in the Wiki entry, which may therefore be disseminating out of date / incorrect info.
:To be clear, this is not a cut-and paste, the material has been rewritten. Unlike the BL, readers of this article can link to all sorts of related topics etc Johnbod 12:21, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Almost all information in Wikipedia is derived from other sources, and all information in Wikipedia should be. This article is indeed a rewrite of the BL catalog information, but only because I haven't taken the time to acquire other sources, and incorporate that information into the article. I am actively involved in incorporating the information from  multiple sources into many illuminated manuscript articles. But, I have only a limited amount of time. Given enough time and editors interested in the subject, WP will eventually have articles incorporating all relevent scholarship on every significant illuminated manuscript. Although a google search will lead you to the BL catalog page, I susect that most people don't come to this article via that route. I suspect that they get here through the category system or by following links in other articles. HAving the most complete information posssible for reader who get here by means other than google makes duplicating the information in BL useful. Dsmdgold 18:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Is "substantional" like "computistical"? Seriously, it would be more use adding to the many articles you will find in :Category:Illuminated manuscript stubs, or indeed to the main articles Illuminated manuscript and Miniature (illuminated manuscript).  Ideally, you might say something on why the MS is of interest and importance also.
I don't understand your reference to "substantional"; it doesn't seem to appear in this article. The web is a bountiful source of unreliable information, so I think it is more important to correct mistakes and improve the value of existing WP articles, than to just add another article -- whose value will inevitably be questionable if lots of other WP articles are unreliable.
PeterKidd 09:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

text: It was how you described your edit here in the edit summary. All those stubs are existing. Johnbod 12:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Powderfinger discography

message: http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/23790/20080320-0000/issue942.pdf Shows that B-side "One More Kiss As You Fly Away" reached 81 on the ARIA Chart  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.174.18.3 (talk) 03:34, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm; #81 is "UFO" by Sneaky Sound System (page 4). —Giggy 05:56, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was the wrong issue, you need No. 945 or No. 946 (the latter is now in the article).shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:05, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: One More Kiss As You Fly Away
Talk:Mormon Alliance

message: To me, notability of this organization seems to be a borderline case. By the notability criteria for organizations, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. No such sources were given; I looked for them on the Web, and found at least coverage in a local newspaper (added that to the article). This alone would probably not be enough to establish notability. On the other hand, the publications ("Case Reports") of the M.A. are listed by many libraries.
For the time being, I am resetting the date counter of the notability tag, and hope that a subject-matter expert can add more secondary sources.
Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 12:16, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Much later, I agree it's borderline. I've tried to add a few sources, and have, but ...   There is a little bit more if one searches for "Mormon Defense League" in that time frame, that's going to be harder to do as a 2011 org with the same name is starting to make that search more difficult.  I would be curious if the MA generated any more visible reaction in mainstream LDS pubs, so far here we're not hearing much (and maybe not much was said), but I can't get past the idea that I might be missing something through my lack of knowledge of LDS-oriented publications. --j⚛e deckertalk 17:42, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: The Alliance is defunct, judging by the website. I updated the article to reflect the fact that the newsletters and case report publications have ceased. I also did not find anything about the quarterly meetings continuing.
Carneadiiz (talk) 02:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  inactivity
Template talk:Historical Scottish railway companies

message: Spent some time reorganising this new template to resemble its "sister" template with the current Scottish lines. It should all be in the right place but if anyone spots an error or disagrees feel free to change/comment. --Dreamer84 22:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template layout

message: I have added a few and made a couple of corrections.
I'm not sure what the purpose of this template is, but it occupies a lot of space on a lot of pages.
Is it a list of companies whose lines later became part of the network of one of the big ones? If so then branches built by one of the big companies don't count.
What about companies that built a railway but never worked their own line? These companies simply raked in a lease charge and in most cases were grouped in 1923.
Many of the entries have the word "railway" suppressed. I can see that this could become tedious, but it rather degrades the accuracy. Afterbrunel (talk) 21:16, 28 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope?
Talk:NTU method

message: The maths notation, but especially the suffices, need doing properly - trouble is I forget how to use the maths editor over the intervening weeks... Anyone else want to tidy? (I will in due course, else) Linuxlad 12:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notation

message: It would be great to get a graph of NTU vs Effectiveness for different Cr's and an explanation of the graph behavior.
Ahlfi006 (talk) 21:55, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graph
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music of the United Kingdom

message: There is a discussion occuring here, regarding which music articles should be deemed vital to the Wikipedia project. Your input would be appreciated. GabeMc (talk|contribs)  01:34, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vital articles 

message: Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the WikiProject X proposal 

message: Hello everyone!
You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!
Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.
Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject X is live! 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Talk:Elsie Fogerty

message: I have a copyright free reproduction of the oil painting of Elsie Fogerty that hangs in the lobby of the Central School.  I would like to contribute it to this article, but I do not know how.  A little help?
Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Crouchend524 (talk • contribs) 04:14, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture?
Talk:Louis Couperus

message: The article mentions Oscar Wilde as a 'homoerotic subject' of his work, along with heliogabaldus and wrestlers. Where in Couperus' oeuvre is Wilde actually a subject of a literary work? Doesn't the link stop between the comparability of the two authors?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.92.117.233 (talk) 13:36, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wilde as a subject? 

message: It seems to me that the fairly recent trend of labelling certain famous authors such as Henry James and Herman Melville and now Louis Couperus as "gay/bisexual writers" should be banned from Wikipedia as decidedly unencyclopedic as long there is no biographical evidence whatsoever to support these claims. Homo-erotic interest is one thing, but leading an actively gay life is quite another. The respective bonfires of both James' and Couperus' private (and possibly homo-erotic) correspondence are intriguing, but one ought not to jump to conclusions. In this light, it's interesting to note that James found Wilde's lifestyle decidedly vulgar (though he rued his imprisonment) and avoided meeting the allegedly decadent entourage of Richard Wagner in Italy (see Fred Kaplan's biography "The Imagination of Genius"). I wish the eminent Wikipedian Professor Casey Abell were still around to shed some light on this matter, but unfortunately, he seems to have retired. Can he be reached by email, perhaps?
Frankly speaking (talk) 06:45, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jumping to conclusions? 

message: *Rewrite "Biography" section to correct English
*Add new "Legacy" section
*Add new "Writing style" section
*Expand lead section
*Expand "External links" section
*Improve "Bibliography" section
*Find more (English) translations of Couperus' books
Michael! (talk) 19:25, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: To do list

message: I believe the current bibliography is too long for inclusion in this article. I suggest to split the list into the seperate article Louis Couperus bibliography and include a much shorter list of works based on the Complete Works subsection, properly formatted following Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lists of works. – Editør (talk) 10:28, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split bibliography 

message: The current text mentions "steamboat Prins Hendrik". I am not knowledgeable in ship denominations, but I noticed differences in definitions for "steamboat" and "steamship", and I noticed that a note for 11 November 1872 on https://www.marhisdata.nl/zoeken&s=kronieken&year=1880 mentions "stoomschip" in its reference to "Prins Hendrik". Redav (talk) 16:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steamship rather that steamboat?
Talk:Anointed (band)

message: This page is brand new.  to make it better, we need pics, a much more detailed discography, and an accurate and verfiable record of chart success.  Any takers? Italics99 13:00, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the discography and the current chart information is enough, for now. I'm trying to create articles on all four band members (past and present). Any help possible is welcome. I'm using info from several websites   . aJCfreak yAk 07:16, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Info Needed
Talk:Sébastien Buemi

message: What is the reason for his name not being written as ‘Bümi’? 91.107.110.33 (talk) 21:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I can find no indication that his name is spelt "Bümi" - his official website, the Scuderia Toro Rosso website, formula1.com etc. all refer to him as "Buemi", so this would appear to be his actual name, and not just the Anglophone convention of dealing with umlauts.--Midgrid(talk) 17:24, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

text: His official website and f1.com take precedence over anything else. Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nunthorpe–Battersby Link

message: I'm horribly confused - help! The line is still in use but there's a lot of past tense too, which contradicts this. I know the situation is complex, but can it not be sorted out better than this by someone knowledgeable? (for example, not me.) Thanks and best wishes, DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 18:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tenses
Talk:Victory Shield

message: I will contribute to this article further.Ryannus 13:13, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History
Talk:Toyota i-unit

message: That's the question I want to ask. Lightblade 00:25, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  How fast can this thing go? 

message: Toyota iUnit seems to describe the same thing, so I propose a merge 192.114.91.226 (talk) 13:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Stepho  (talk) 05:27, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Red Munger

message: Newspaper article about his return to the Cardinals following his Army Service: George Munger To Rejoin Cards: Pitcher Returns From Army Service. Pittsburgh, PA: The Pittsburgh Press. UP. August 18, 1946. p. 23. Bob305 (talk) 04:41, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Incorporated into the article today. Bob305 (talk) 01:33, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Newspaper article
Talk:Irv Noren

message: Newspaper article about his 1955 suspension for somebody to incorporate into the Wikipedia article:
*Yank Player Suspended For Row With Ump. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Associated Press (AP). April 16, 1955, p. 12.
Bob305 (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  1955 Suspension
Talk:Aaron Robinson (baseball)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved  Run n Fly (talk) 20:01, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Aaron Robinson →  – no clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC Joeykai (talk) 15:26, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move 1 May 2021

message: There are no reliable sources found as of yet state that Robinson served in the Coast Guard in a war zone during World War II. More specifically, the sources do not establish defining role in World War II. Accordingly, "Category:United States Coast Guard personnel of World War II" was removed until a defining role is established. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 21:17, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: World War II service
Talk:Ensilage

message: Merging silage and ensilage makes good sense, or cross-referencing would also be helpful.
:No, don't merge, no need to make an article of ridiculous length  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.83.231.100 (talk) 21:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge. There is complete overlap. Olli Niemitalo (talk) 15:32, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Talk:SAN

message: I support the merger of SAN and Sat - at least this makes interwiki linking easier, and saves the reader an extra click. --Purodha Blissenbach 13:47, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: First, I believe you meant to type San rather than Sat, secondly, this merger has already been completed. --Ctrlfreak13 14:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?

message: SAN stands for "Short algebraic notation" or "Standard algebraic notation"? The second is take directly from the standard, so it should apply: http://www.thechessdrum.net/PGN_Reference.txt — Preceding unsigned comment added by  Tokland  (talk • contribs)  22:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notation

message: Someone, presumably with the initials C.K. was messing around and put this at the top of the page:
"
CK, stop procrastinating and start your paper on the interesting subject of SAN.
"
I deleted this from the page when I found it. -- Chris Cowing-Zitron  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.54.63.75 (talk) 00:29, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed spam

message: "Subject Alternative Name, part of the X.509 standard for a public key certificate that permits it to identify more than one entity or device"
Not so.  Since there is at present no article on Subject Alternative Name, I leave this note here. The purpose of X.509 is to identify entities; this alternative name may only be another (alternative) name for the same entity.
(Also: a device is an entity.)
User:Joaquin  (another name for the entity, me)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Certification

message: how did san live together 41.114.244.159 (talk) 06:01, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Xhosa
Talk:T. J. Ryan

message: This really should be expanded on... Timeshift (talk) 03:10, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Labor premier to survive the 1st Labor split intact 

message: As there's been a bit of discussion on User Talk pages about the naming of this article, I just thought I'd raise the issue here in case a broader set of people want to comment. The article has been "T.J. Ryan" for quite a while but was renamed "Tom Ryan" because it is unusual for an article to be named with initials, but then returned to "T.J. Ryan". I'm an advocate of "T.J. Ryan" because, as a Queenslander, that's the only way I hear him called in books, etc. I suspect this may have come about because of the earlier Tommy Ryan (politician). The two men both had the full name of Thomas Joseph Ryan, both were Labor, and both represented the Electoral district of Barcoo, quite a coincidence given they don't appear to be related. So I can see that there may have been a need to distinguish between the two men that may have resulted in the T.J. moniker which I believe constitutes his WP:COMMONNAME but obviously to be a "common name" there should be a broad consensus among us that this is how he is commonly known. So I throw it open for further comment. Kerry (talk) 01:42, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: And there was also Thomas Ryan (1870–1943), a Labor politician in Victoria who was active in a similar time frame to T.J. Ryan, as another potential source of confusion. What a popular name it was! Kerry (talk) 01:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I think is one of those rare cases in which the initials are indeed his present-day common name: as I mentioned to Frickeg on his talk page, "T. J. Ryan" queensland premier turns up vastly more results than "Tom Ryan" queensland premier. (The other obvious example of this situation being H. V. Evatt, which is drastically more common than any of the alternative names for him.) The Drover's Wife (talk) 04:06, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't have much more to say about this - I still don't like it much and think if we were serious about it we would be renaming the vast majority of pre-50s politicians (not something I support), but I'm not going to make a big deal of it. I will say that in general a lot of other articles seem to be at the full name in this instance (i.e. Thomas Joseph Ryan), for example Arthur Edward Moore. Frickeg (talk) 14:09, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choice of article title, T.J. Ryan vs Tom Ryan 

message: Who are these people? I assume a mixture of his children, siblings, and parents, but why are they all chucked together in a big table with no explanation? Ivar the Boneful (talk) 09:21, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooh, good catch. What a mess! Given that these were added in a succession of IP edits back in 2010, and the reference is not helpful (doesn't refer to any of the listed references), and none of them appear to be even notable-adjacent, I have removed the section. Frickeg (talk) 09:49, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family section
Talk:Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis

message: This would be a good one to put a "redirect" for:  XDR-TB to this site; if there's not already a link from a page on tuberculosis, there should be.   Glad to see someone starting an article so soon after it makes the news. Mandsford 13:54, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This redirect was already in place as of May 2007. — ERcheck (talk) 13:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: Are the drug-resistance factors of XDR carried by a phage?David.Throop 14:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Source of Resistance

message: I work for the America's Most Wanted Safety Center, a new department of America's Most Wanted getting away from the capturing of criminals, and branching out to all aspects of safety. I feel a link to our post about avoiding TB when traveling would be appropriate and mutually beneficial, being that it was inspired by the Andrew Speaker situation and gives helpful tips that I'm sure people are curious about. The link is http://www.amw.com/safety/?p=63 please consider it.
Jrosenfe 15:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a link 

message: Is the full reference to Andrew Speaker relevant?  It has been stablished that he did not have this strain of the disease.--R6rome 21:44, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Andrew Speaker 

message: The paragraph on Dr. Jeremiah Chakaya was not cited. I've tracked down and added a cite.
( http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&cid=1239888945806&pagename=Zone-English-HealthScience%2FHSELayout ). 
Dr Chakaya's comments appear useful to our article, however, it looks like some of this has been directly quoted without this being correctly specified.Could someone involved from WikiProject Medicine please review this and determine what should be kept/deleted/clarified? Thanks. -- 201.37.230.43 (talk) 17:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dr. Jeremiah Chakaya quotes need review