lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rockwell B-1 Lancer

message: According to this Wikipedia page -
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_combat_losses_of_United_States_military_aircraft_since_the_Vietnam_War
a B1 was shot down in Afghanistan.
This should be added here.￼ 109.144.29.220 (talk) 02:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia cannot cite itself, so we need a reliable published source for the claim. There is a cited source in that article for the claim, but it's behind a paywall. Since I can't verify the claim, I won't add it. It does seem odd that an event that supposedly happened over 20 years ago is already the article, and I certainly don't remember hearing about it in 2001. BilCat (talk) 03:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

text: According to https://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/b-1b-loss.htm there were two losses near Afghanistan, but neither were due to combat. Mysticdan (talk) 13:56, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing combat loss 

message: Seperating from the standard notion of flying fast and high, the F-14 on steroids instead flies low and very fast. the small murican' Tu-160 has a top speed around mach 1.8 or, one bajillion miles per century. the actually useful murican' MiG-23 is one of the 3 American strategic bombers. the oversized Tu-22m is far more useful and overall better than the Tu-22m.
I will delete this if required Taffy boeing b 17 (talk) 16:57, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: * That's not necessary now. Regards, -Fnlayson (talk) 21:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overkill F-111
Talk:John R. Lewis College

message: How can we update the title of the article to replace College Ten with the correct new name, John Lewis College? Jmdc-chicago (talk) 11:39, 16 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update title
Talk:Cascade Pass

message: I believe this is identical to Skagit Pass, and have edited and cited for that (with thanks to User:Murderbike for aiming me at the citations). But it's possible I'm confused. Does anyone have anything more certain? - Jmabel | Talk 03:13, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's , but I couldn't find anything in GNIS resembling Skagit Pass.  There are 25 features in Washington State with "Skagit" in them. —EncMstr (talk) 04:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Skagit Pass
Talk:Miss America

message: Would splitting off the scandal as a separate level-3 header be warranted? My concern is that on the one hand, we shouldn't slant the article towards recent events (WP:DUE, WP:NOTNEWS), but on the other, it may well end up being a very significant event from the organization, and reliable sources have talked about it losing public funding from CRDA, which would be a large setback.--Jasper Deng (talk) 19:40, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Not yet.  Right now, we've got a good description of the events and its aftermath, and it doesn't overwhelm the History sub-section.  If that changes, we can then talk about whether this event "opened a new chapter" in the organization's history.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 20:05, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I modified historical subheads to create consistency in the article. -Classicfilms (talk) 17:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate section for the scandal 

message: Opening line of main body states "Miss America is a beauty pageant" this should be changed to "Miss America is a competition". This is clearly stated publicly and unambiguously by Miss America Chair of the Board Gretchen Carlson on a televised interview for ABC News. The moment this is stated can be seen here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7zToQ0w1XAw in the time frame between 0:22 and 0:26. Gretchen Carlson then goes on to state that "We will no longer judge our candidates on their outward physical appearance." This is why I suggest removing any reference to the words beauty as well as changing pageant to competition. This is in the same linked video time frame 0:25 to 0:30. Thank you for considering my edit request as it is my first time doing this and I hope I have followed the conventions in use. Zegrze (talk) 20:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Done L293D (☎ • ✎) 12:01, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2018 

message: Perhaps something should be said about the relationship or nonrelationship to other titles/competitions: Miss USA, Miss World, Miss Universe.  I always thought Miss America  was part of the Miss Universe world, but apparently not. 2600:6C67:1C00:5F7E:9C6B:5193:60E8:85E1 (talk) 16:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miss . . .  

message: I recently made an article for the Miss America 2025 and related pageant for Wikipedia, but it was stated before this article can be included onto the English Wikipedia it needs to be made neutral, more references will be needed and more information is required along with the facts before this Miss America article is included onto EnWiki with detail involving the contestants and the crowning of the 2025 Miss America. Angela Kate Maureen Pears 14:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Miss America 2025 article  

message: Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed: Ruth Malcomson. -- Vysotsky (talk) 20:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miss America 1924 a Philadelphia citizen?
Talk:Samuel Hodge

message: From the article page:
:please update if you know where his medal is publicly displayed
Alai 07:55, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there is something hanging in Government House in Tortola - whether it is his original VC, or whether it is a copy, I could not say for sure, but I will try to find out. --Legis (talk - contribs) 12:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Onryō

message: Either this is copied from the Monstropedia or Monstropedia copied this.  Either way, this article needs revision.  207.216.200.81 (talk) 02:23, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Total Revamp 

message: There's several examples of onryō in modern Japanese folklore. Take, for instance, the teke-teke, a woman who was cut in half by a train and whose ghost goes about tearing people in half.  There's also Hanako-san of the Toilet, the kuchisake-onna, to name a few.  We could use these examples to make it more distinct from "Monstropedia", as the above post suggests.  173.180.75.13 (talk) 08:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese Folklore Examples 

message: In the Yūrei article, Kayako Saeki is classified as Jibakurei and not as Onryō. What article is correct? George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 03:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kayako
Talk:General Hospital

message: She Looks like Cameron's "LITTLE" Sister 🌟 2600:1700:C4E0:85A0:AC31:88E1:F0AC:F935 (talk) 14:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elizabeth 

message: Why wasn't Days of our Lives added to the list , it's still showing and just as good on Peacock. 2601:482:3:EEF0:1D4E:F9B3:CA00:7B7B (talk) 01:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question  

message: running since 1960 continues to this day 78.17.60.85 (talk) 08:12, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  CORONATION STREET UK
Talk:Conspiracy theories (a collection)

message: This story was bulk exported from Conspiracy theory to rescue that article from unintelligibility. However, there is now clearly an overlap between this article and the already existing List_of_conspiracy_theories. It would be nice to amalgamate the two, if anyone has the patience. Adhib 09:24, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Yes indeed, it was meant to be a temporary measure. Needs to be done.--Cberlet 15:06, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: There is a new page, Wikipedia:Conspiracy_theory where there is going to be a larger discussion of the use of the term "Conspiracy Theory" in Wiki titles. It would be ideal if people with a variety of viewpoints joined the discussion on that page, since a number of page titles are likely to be discussed, and name changes debated.--Cberlet 20:18, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Debate on "Conspiracy Theory" in Wiki page titles

message: To be a conspiracy theory, is it sufficient that the evidence offered be tenuous and unconvincing? Because if that were the case, the explanation offered by the U.S. goverment, that the September 11 attacks were carried out by al-Qaeda, would seem to qualify as such a theory. Or does the fact that the theory is being promoted by a powerful, "mainstream" institution exempt it from being deemed a conspiracy theory? --HK 01:13, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Question regarding the definition of "conspiracy theory"
Talk:Force Dynamics/to do

message: # Incorporate BrokenSeque's comments on spellings. In most cases (and probably in all), force dynamics should be uncapitalized.
# Sort out the major incompletenesses pointed out by Bishonen:
## The article should be more clear on the status of FD diagrams and situations. It should be clear that FD at the language level represents human conceptualization of the world. Additionally, this means that Talmy himself mixes various levels of description, sometimes leading to confusion about what a FD diagram in a certain case is meant to represent exactly. The issue is here that of a given situation, you can draw sort of a 'factual' FD diagram (based on the 'bare facts' of the situation), and you can draw a 'conceptual' FD diagram, representing the way human language talks about this situation — the two need not be different, but they may well be.
## The article should be clear on how to assign the Agonist/Antagonist roles.
## The paragraph about representational devices needs to be a little less abstract. Maybe give an example.
Last update:  — mark ✎ 09:29, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Category talk:Linux word processors

message: I'm not sure how to handle Word Perfect.  Word Perfect has been available for Linux, and, indeed, was the first full-fledged word processor available for Linux.  However, it is not available for Linux now (barring buying a CD of Caldera's old Internet Office Suite or an old versionf of Corel Linux off of Ebay).  Should it be listed here?  Samboy 09:50, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm not sure how to handle Word Perect
Talk:Route 66 (disambiguation)

message: Not going to chainge the page for a 3mi. (5km.) discrepancy,  but everything I've ever read about Route 66 (also, I wasjust over 4 when it officially ceased being called Route 66) says that it was 2,451mi./3,945km., not 2,448mi./3,940km.ADg2k14 (talk) 02:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Length?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 19:35, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Route 66 →  – And turn Route 66 into a redirect to U.S. Route 66. Clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, both by page views over five years (, ) and by its widespread and lasting cultural significance, as attested by the TV shows, films, songs, bands, companies, etc. on the disambiguation page which all refer to the US highway. Despite being decommissioned nearly 40 years ago, U.S. Route 66 remains in a class of its own; other articles about prominent highways don't even come close. Rublov (talk) 19:25, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 December 2021
Talk:St Lawrence Ground

message: I'd love to see a picture of the old tree in all its glory. Does anyone have one? Lisiate 00:20, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Shouldn't there be a mention of the Canterbury Festival, which I believe has been going for something like 150 years? Also Canterbury must be one of the oldest grounds, along with Lord's, The Oval and Trent Bridge, and there ought to be something about its history, at least to say when the ground opened and when Kent first played there. The tree is important, but the article seems obsessed with it to the exclusion of all else. I'll leave expanding the article to a Kent expert (I'm a Surrey man myself). JH 18:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Canterbury Festival
Talk:Antony Hewish

message: Hewish & Hoyle - worth noting that Hoyle, who was at IoTA, and the MRAO team had had a rather uneasy working relationship in the mid 60s - a carryover from the 2C source-counts controversy, I understand. Thus Hoyle's remarks about the non-inclusion of Jocelyn Bell-Burnell on the Nobel Prize were viewed by some as neither particularly informed (he hadn't had any close involvement in the work, and indeed the pulsar-discovery was a close secret until late on, I understand) nor particularly NPOV (to coin a phrase) :-)
Linuxlad 11:41, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: On this documentary it is suggested Anthony might not have deserved the nobel prize since the pulsars were discovered by his student (a young woman who claims she was ignored due to being a female). Should there be a mention on that controversy?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDW9zKqvPJI 103.6.150.203 (talk) 07:06, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's already in this article, with a link to a more detailed discussion in another article: "The exclusion of Bell from the Nobel prize was controversial (see Nobel prize controversies)". Modest Genius talk 11:35, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy
Talk:Thomas Watson (bishop of Lincoln)

message: This article looks like it's been copied verbatim from somewhere else. Possible copyright infringement?
There is no doubt in my mind that this is copyrighted and taken verbatim: where else do the first four or five letters of an article appear in all capitals?  Someone really needs to look into this. Kakashi-sensei 15:25, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, but it'd be hard to prove.  Google searching doesn't turn up anything but this article.  It could concievably be legit, so I guess it's innocent until proven guilty. Uttaddmb 20:08, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:UK railway stations – B

message: This is a very gentle suggestion that we should use Wiki's excellent template facility for all these pages. Note a modest reduction in the size of this page - from 70k to 18k. 
I have removed the word "Timetable" on every line - it was not quite right. If you want to put it back, you do so in the template, not here. The template is currently only used by this page.
In doing these mods, the page was massaged by four different programs so I may well have introduced regressive errors. If so, my apologies and please let me know - if you cannot fix them easily yourself.
There are four stations that use a different map link and poor old Brunstane has no map link. If someone could please tidy …
-- RHaworth 12:07, 2005 Mar 9 (UTC)
:Note that the arrivals and departures link does not work for Island Line stations (e.g. Brading) -- Picapica 09:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: How about templates?
Talk:Anne Desclos

message: I made a minor change to this article, altering "Following the lifting of the publicity ban in 1967 she wrote the conclusion to The Story of O under the title Retour à Roissy" to "Following the lifting of the publicity ban in 1967 she published the conclusion to The Story of O under the title Retour à Roissy," as my understanding of "Retour à Roissy" is that it is the "final chapter, which has been supressed" described at the end of "Histoire d'O." I recall Reage saying in an interview given at some point or another that it should have remained unpublished, and I can't help but infer that all this means both works were written at the same time.
: It seems according to Angie David that "Retour à Roissy" was not written by Pauline Réage. Maybe by José Cabanis. Hektor 05:43, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Any new information on this important topic??--Nemissimo II 08:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Please refer to the biography by Angie David. Hektor (talk) 23:29, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As I said on Talk:Story_of_O, I wonder if this is a mistranslation.  French "publicité" basically means advertising... AnonMoos (talk) 20:01, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "publicity ban"
Talk:Dinofelis

message: There is no way to actually know other than to observe fossils for injury attributable to Dinofelis teeth or bite.  Even then there will be some speculation involved.
Most neofelids bite prey roughly their size or larger on the throat covering the trachea or the muzzle covering the mouth and nose causing suffocation, the neck or head causing enough trauma to kill, drag and/or weight the animal down to do the above or often beginning to feed without death with multiple felids.  There is no reason to not believe the same instincts and higher processes still operate in neofelids as they did 5 mya.  Jaguars and leopards do bite the skull more often than do lions.  Lions and cheetah are more likely to bite and hold over the trachea but they all use multiple ways of killing including mauling.  Male lions will often maul hyenas including grabbing and throwing and repeated bites.
The teeth of Dinofelis are more conical than blade like and I suspect they killed like neofelids did.  Those teeth are for grabbing and holding with enough canine to puncture the skin.  Certainly one can speculate the longer canines, longer even relatively than a snow leopard, could cause more damage than shorter canines especially with skull and neck bites.  However, I suspect from observation that it doesn't make much difference to the victims who die from the shorter canine bites easily.  I do not suspect Dinofelis killed like true saber cats though.  Jobberone (talk) 03:21, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: Who changed it to "Big Booty Bitches"? I think reparations and reprimands are in order here. 2604:2000:F620:5700:D80B:8DFB:691C:A (talk) 00:09, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order
Talk:Coenraad Johannes van Houten

message: This article might need some rewriting.  I can't find anyplace that it's directly cut-and-pasted from but it looks like there's a lot of close matches on the web, i.e. see . NTK 14:16, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That site has simply copied my original text (a complete rewrite in December 2006). Afasmit 20:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Thanks, though it isn't much text. Could you explain why you added a tone-template stating that the tone or style may be inappropriate for wikipedia? Afasmit 15:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Whay about the famoys case of Van Gouten publicity, when they paid a lot of money to a family of man who was centences to death, and before being executed he said "Drink cacao Van Houten!" and this came to the newspaper?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.91.181.66 (talk) 14:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Biocomplexity Institute of Virginia Tech

message: I removed the merge from for the Virginia Bioinformatics Institute from VT's page.  Much like the NASA research center that VT manages, VBI is a separate institution that VT manages and participates in, it is not directly a part of VT, though that may change in the future.  --Buridan 14:35, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VBI
Talk:Donnybrook, Dublin

message: I've a query on the meaning of donnybrock. As far as I was aware, donnybrock meant "Den of the Badger" - Broc meaning badger, and the first part (sorry, can't spell it) meaning den/home/lair.
Though , I could be wrong.
Never heard of a saint broc though.....
: I've always been suspicious of the name myself - seems like an attempt to impose a Christian origin on the placename.  However, any of the sources I can find backs up the Domhnach Broc story, and I was even able to find some background info on (Saint) Broc: http://relliott.tripod.com/dbrkhist.html --Ryano
::I don't think it's an Irish name at all: dun means brown, brook is a stream, and the River Dodder is well-known for being dirty (it's also known as the River Saile, from the Irish salach, meaning dirty. EamonnPKeane 13:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming

message: ... and with almost the exact same words. First mention is in the second paragraph and then again under "History". I'm not sure where the explanation of the term should be placed but one instance definitely ought to be removed. – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 14:41, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: redundancy: term "a donnybrook (= a brawl)" is explained twice in the article

message: There's a plaque on the wall opposite the Huguenot cemetery/Garda station in Donnybrook to Thomas Davis. What's his connection with Donnybrook? 2A02:8084:6A22:4980:DD8:E299:492A:1FAD (talk) 19:50, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Thomas Davis
Category talk:Fiction about law

message: I'm having second thoughts as to whether this is the best category, perhaps a better name is needed. However, I think it's important to have a category that separates art that uses law as a theme from actual legal concepts. As well, it's really important to distinguish it from Legal fiction, as that IS a legal concept and has nothing to do with fiction as art. -- PullUpYourSocks 15:09, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems reasonable to me, and agree totally with the need to distinguish the concepts. Tim! (talk) 20:01, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:New Cross railway station

message: The rail box at the bottom has both St Johns and Lewisham listed as the next stations, but should it only have St. Johns, as you have to go through the station (or past it, if you're on the fast lines and go over the flyover) to get to Lewisham?
And more generally, do the rail boxes on the pages show geographical routes or are they a reflection of train services? And if the latter, what services should be shown? (eg should the page for Kidbrooke have an entry for the "next" station as Waterloo East due to the few fast trains in the morning that do run fast?) edd 15:28, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That is the key $64,000 question, and no one has yet to come up with an answer. The physical lines (typified in the end by a network rail other number) differ from the services. The former may stretch from say Charing cross to Dover priory via Orpington, Tonbridge and Ashford. But the services will consist of fasts to the end and a variety of stoppers, some going to other locations. I don't have the knowledge to explain the various (complex) services in South London so i have treaded somewhat carefully. There is also a new template to use which is more complex so i haven't got around to updating all the infoboxes with the actual situation. The typical situation is to list the "typical off peak" train services, but if you know the details a Limited Service tag (or Peak service) can be added. Pickle 15:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  infobox 

message: This article claims "600 metres", New Cross Gate station states "600 yards", one (or possibly even both!) is incorrect. Can anyone shed any light? Grunners 82.20.251.196 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 20:05, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  distance to New Cross Gate station 

message: Should New Cross Station be moved to New Cross railway station as the London Underground will not serve this station again as the East London Line is being converted to London Overgorund which is a TOC.Likelife (talk) 12:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Cross Railway station?