Talk:Bound (Star Trek: Enterprise)

message: :Image:Bound (ENT episode).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Bound (ENT episode).jpg

message: In the home release section, it says that "Terra Prime" was released in the season three DVD box set. Surely the intended wording was that "Bound" was released in the season four set? Chris857 (talk) 23:56, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. :) Miyagawa (talk) 11:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terra Prime? 

message: Regarding the recent removal of the review from Jamahl Epsicokhan and Michelle Erica Green, they each meet the reliable source test regardless of what you might prefer. The guidelines for where these might fail are here: WP:QUESTIONABLE. Regarding Epsicokhan first, he began to review Star Trek during the Voyager run, at which point he was considered such an authority on the series that he was invited to pitch story ideas for the series in person to the production crew. That is sufficient demonstration of the validity of his opinion. For Green, her authority is granted through the website she reviews for - TrekNation. This was one of only four fan sites linked to from the official Star Trek website, and for a period in the mid 2000s, the news articles from TrekNation actually appeared on the official fan site. These are not unusual review websites to use on Wikipedia, and if you looked, you'd find a great many of the Good Articles in the Star Trek wikiproject use them. Miyagawa (talk) 18:02, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of reviews 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Bound (Star Trek: Enterprise). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120606095033/http://trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=41ce90f2f16c5 to http://www.trekweb.com/stories.php?aid=41ce90f2f16c5
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1%2C1002%2C272%7C94737%7C1%7C%2C00.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1%2C1002%2C272%7C94866%7C1%7C%2C00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified