lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mercedes College (Adelaide)

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.news.com.au/national/south-australia/mercedes-college-employee-suspended-over-historic-sex-offences/news-story/ab67d8c6015e408a6de14504bcc71a75. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  NotAGenious (talk) 08:41, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Phycology

message: I was redirected here from Algology. As far as I am aware, Algology means the study of pain, not algae (although I imagine it is both). There are still medical departments concerned with pain which call themselves 'Dept of Algology.' I would make a disambiguation page but I think it is beyond my capabilitites 87.84.86.130 10:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Algology
Talk:Philadelphia Eagles

message: Please add an update tag in the “ Nick Sirianni years (2021–present)”, since it does not mention the 2023 collapse of the eagles. 12.74.238.84 (talk) 22:15, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: . The 🏎 Corvette 🏍 ZR1(The Garage) 17:17, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 January 2024 

message: I was wondering if a note will be added on Jason Kelce's retirement? Thanks! XZealous (talk) 12:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jason Kelce Retirement 

message: The current uniforms at the top of the page are incorrect. The eagles still wear their black alternate jerseys and pants as a secondary alternate uniform in addition to their kelly green throw back alternate uniform. However they wear the green helmets with the black uniforms unlike the black helmeted they wore in 2022-2023 which they no longer use. See pictures from their home game against the New York Giants this past season if you need evidence/proof. 2600:1002:B030:B4D1:559B:9561:610B:CF4A (talk) 17:56, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. WikiVirusC(talk) 13:27, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 March 2024 

message: Suggestion to ADD the color Kelly green to team colors. Source 1 the teams indicated alternate jersey. Source 2 a requested trademark for the specific wordmark Kelly Green for use as merchandising in relation to the team: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=98247742&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch KinzokumenJeeb (talk) 20:15, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Charliehdb (talk) 10:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 24 May 2024
Talk:Baldr

message: Did the Germanic peoples consider the death of Baldur to be an event in their past, or in their future? The text doesn't make this clear. -- 84.57.73.92 20:53, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baldur's death: Past or Future? 

message: I've removed the section of the article which referenced a willow tree being cursed by Loki to be unable to weep for Baldr.  This point did not cite any source and as far as I am aware the versions of Baldr's death in both the prose and poetic Edda do not mention any willow tree.  I'm happy to be corrected if someone can provide a source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GalbertofBruges (talk • contribs) 04:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baldr and the Willow Tree 

message: What exactly is Baldr the god of? Michael May II (talk) 20:42, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This [god] of [x] construction you're looking for is an extremely simplistic take on complex systems that developed over many years. This is particularly notable for Norse myth, where easy answers are particularly difficult to find. I suggest that you read the article. :bloodofox: (talk) 20:44, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baldr, god of... what? 

message: Does the Prose Edda mention Váli when the article states it does? I cannot find him in any translation there, and the reference itself does not include him. Váli killing Hod is attested in the Poetic Edda, but I don't think it is in the Prose Edda itself.Eladabudi (talk) 20:08, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Váli in the Prose Edda 

message: The article claims that Baldr was known to some mainland Saxons as "Baldag", but the source for this claim leads to nothing but a quote. This claim should be removed unless someone can properly source it. Hurlebatte (talk) 15:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for Baldag? 

message: Bældæg is listed as a son of Woden by some manuscripts. Baldr is said to be a son of Othin by some manuscripts. Their names are a bit similar. Is this really all we're basing the claim on that they're the same figure? This seems like incredibly weak evidence which no good scholar would ever leap to a conclusion from. Hurlebatte (talk) 15:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This compound as a form of the deity name has been a common observation in scholarship since at least Grimm (who linked it with the expansive 'day' complex of theonyms and Germanic personal names, and proposed the Old High German cognate *Paltac). But it also occurred long before: It is acknowledged as an Old English form of Old Norse Baldr in the Prose Edda ("Beldeg, er vér kǫllum Baldr"). Another attested Old English form is Herebald (Beowulf), quite recently revisited for example by Lindow (2020). This article could use an expansion. :bloodofox: (talk) 18:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That's much better evidence, I'll work it into the article some time. Hurlebatte (talk) 17:50, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  How do we know Bældæg was Baldr?
Talk:Aurel Stein

message: Googling for "Mark Aurel Stein" and "Marc Aurel Stein" seems to indicate a pretty even split once one has discounted the Wiki-derivative sites. UK sites seem to prefer Mark with a k so is this an Anglo-Hungarian spelling difference or did he change his name at some stage? Has anyone got some of his books to indicate what name he went by? adamsan  11:50, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The back cover of my Dover copy of "Ruins of Desert Cathay" spells his name "Mark".  However, the British Library website for its current Silk Road exhibition spells his name "Marc".  Confusingly, the BL catalogue listings for his book offer up both "Mark" and "Marc".  I'd say "Marc" would be the best for now, since the BL has it twice, but I have not been able to find any record of Stein writing his own name any other way than "M. Aurel Stein". --Radulfus 14:40, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marc v. Mark 

message: The original described Stein as a "Jewish archaeologist" which is inaccurate. Stein had converted to Christianity. He was therefore of "Jewish descent." Thus corrected. --Iwanafish 16:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  JEWISH 
Talk:Bill Oddie Goes Wild

message: Original edit from the (sadly now defunct) BillOddie.net site, by permission. Andy Mabbett 11:41, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Original edit

message: Can someone go through this and sort out the contractions. Wikipedia policy is not to use contractions unless quoting someone directly. I appreciate this is taken with permission from a now defunct web site, but it can be updated without altering the content. If I get the time in the next few days I'll come back and do it. --Colin Angus Mackay 12:13, 14 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word usage 

message: Can someone complete the episode lists, please? Andy Mabbett 23:20, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode guide
Talk:Radial keratotomy

message: An eye surgeon commented on the precision that must be made during the surgery as such; "Imagine a layer of ten wet paper tissues.  That's the depth of the cornea. Now, cut through nine of those layers without scratching the last one." Edwardian 06:16, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Information removed

message: Other sources cite surgeries leaving 20 to 50 micrometres of corneal tissue unincised (roughly equivalent to 90% of corneal depth based on thickness norms).
This formulation requires revising. The statement "20 to 50 micrometres of corneal tissue unincised is roughly equivalent to 90% of corneal depth based on thickness norms" is terribly confusing. Besides, the referenced source doesn't seem to be one of the "other sources" mentioned in the beginning of the sentence, so at least one other reference is required for the "20 to 50 micrometres".
Ds380 (talk) 01:41, 1 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Correction required

message: I'll refer to a personal anecdote here when saying that some people who suffer from ever worsening myopia might benefit from the possible side effect of radial keratotomy mentioned in the article: ever increasing hyperopia.  My nearsightedness was much more debilitating than the farsightedness that resulted from from the surgery.  The farsightedness hasn't been difficult to compensate for with reading glasses, while the nearsightedness was very problematic and produced an ongoing feeling of vulnerability. Joseph Meisenhelder (talk) 14:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tendency toward progressive hyperopia may be favorable 

message: Of Mini asymmetric radial keratotomy sounds like a good idea. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:29, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: It looks like the story about Fydorov is wrong, or at least written incorrectly here. According to legend, it wasn't a bicycle accident, but instead a fist fight in the early 70s.
The second source claims in happened in 1972, and also states it was a fist fight where the glass embedded in a radial pattern of the cornea, and after healing the cornea flattened out which alleviated the myopia.
https://www.npr.org/2006/10/12/6249164/dr-slava-fyodorovs-beautiful-eyes
Introduction to Optics, 2nd edition, Frank L. Pedrotti, Leno S. Pedrotti, 1993 Prentice-Hall Inc, page 164 71.11.5.2 (talk) 20:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: "Approximately 10% of all practicing ophthalmologists in the United States have performed several hundred thousand RK procedures" is both confusing and a direct quote from sited source. Do you think it should be removed or replaced with information about how it is infrequently performed?
Pjp992 (talk) 23:53, 2 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead Section 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ahaq23 (talk) 01:32, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Wikipedia for the Medical Editor

message: This section requires more detail. Thinking of adding additional information from PERK trial including the percentage of patients corrected within 1D. 
Pjp992 (talk) 23:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Results
Category talk:Culture

message: *These category pages have popped everywhere but I cannot see where we can discuss if they are a good idea. Is there a talk category somewhere? --BozMo|talk 13:23, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You can start at Wikipedia:Category. Ancheta Wis 21:02, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a new Wikipedia:WikiProject_Culture that could use your help. Thanks. Quinobi 03:57, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi
I'm working on the portal at :Category:Geography. At the moment that and this page are very similar looking but we should probably aim to sync design and layout and such. You may wish to look at that page and see if there's anything you want to incorporate. Cheers, --komencanto 13:38, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi from Geography people 

message: Over the past few days efforts have been made to 1- merge the portal pages of the 8 main-page subjects with their category pages, and 2- make them consistent with each others. Before making significant layout changes please discuss it so the 8 pages remain consistent. Elfguy 20:02, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consistency 

message: Why did you make this category part of the Top 10 category but with an inicial space:
  Culture
It doesn't look so good to me, mainly because it isn't sorted in the C block but instead, in a no initial block. jοτομικρόν | Talk 12:59, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorisation
Category talk:Nature

message: I moved it from Category:Fundamental to Category:Structure as the article on structure states that nature is considered a part of "structure", which is a very encompassing concept. Esnaz (talk) 01:43, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: Main discussion here: Talk:Nature#Are the Phenomena part of Nature or vice versa?
Regards, --W like wiki good to know 06:03, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the Phenomena part of Nature or vice versa?
Category talk:Social sciences

message: These category pages have popped everywhere but I cannot see where we can discuss if they are a good idea. Is there a talk category somewhere?--BozMo|talk 13:24, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: old comments

message: I am surprised that there is no social science portal. If doable, it is time to create one. If anyone wants to help, please do. Vir 05:13, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that we could improve the current social science page by adding a tad more information on each of the social sciences mentioned. This may help when people look at the page to see what exactly each of the social sciences does.Grgarcia5 (talk) 03:42, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

text: I think we could add the history behind the social sciences, like who discovered it, when it was discovered, how long it took to become a credible field of study, etc. Jmann126 (talk) 00:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social science portal
Talk:Kritocracy

message: Stanley Reed was, of course, correct. 
We now live in "The United States of Krytocracy".
Give me a break- this adds no value to the discussion. Every branch of government should work, not just the legislative and executive. Your comment just shows the attitude of a certain un-American element in society that is unhappy that they cannot control every facet of the US Government.
((Below: Just copying someone else's material they left on the main page after the last edit. Also, capitals are like swearing. They're good to add emphasis sometimes, but annoying when used constantly. Omnipotent Q 04:34, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC)

message: I don't think that Judge Dredd is really a good example of this, since although the fictional rulers in those stories are called judges, that title is misleading, because they are not actually judges in the sense that we understand the term. They do not "rule" by allowing their own opinions to influence their court rulings and thereby usurping the legislative branch's function; they rule in the same way that the Nazis ruled Germany. I'm removing this example. Richard75 01:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional krytocracies section 

message: If these two are different as the article states then why are Somalia and ancient Israel given as examples of both forms of government? AstroMark (talk) 12:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kritocracy vs. kritarchy
Talk:Groundhog

message: The final sentence of the section stating they are thought not to drink water appears to be incorrect, as I have a groundhog drinking from my bird-bath every morning. Mrsuperboot (talk) 01:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diet 

message: Article states groundhogs not known to drink water, as they may get it from moisture in plants/vegetables.  Our neighborhood groundhog does drink from the outdoor cats water bowl, as it eats from the cats bowl of Iams dry cat food.  The groundhog has a badly deformed left rear leg, but seems to move quite well.  Lives in a borrow under my neighbors side porch.  We live on a very busy street in east Dayton, Ohio, but the groundhog moves around between our two yards with cats standing around, but takes off if humans appear to close, but doesn’t run off as I watch from my window him/her eat and drink on my porch. 2603:6011:C721:6300:15F4:F307:F22F:18D1 (talk) 18:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groundhog diet
Talk:Greatest Hits III (Queen album)

message: Too Much Love Will Kill You was mispelled as 'TOO MUCH LOVE WIIL KILL YOU' on the CD pressings. Someone should note that. I'd do it myself, but my edit was unsucessful. JasonDeLima 22:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, you're both right (or your both wrong, depending upon your POV) - I can't say one way or the other if it was misspelled on the original GHIII, but on the platinum collection remastered 2011 it was misspelled. See this site...you may have to zoom in a bit, but it is misspelled. https://picclick.co.uk/Queen-Greatest-Hits-1-2-3-Platinum-392182341416.html FiggazWithAttitude (talk) 15:35, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Mispell

message: Despite being a greatest hits compilation, the first two tracks actually made a debut on this album
It should be noted however, that they are only new versions of classic Queen songs. No actual original song debuted on this album. 82.141.74.224 (talk) 15:14, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a note of this to the article. 82.141.66.136 (talk) 00:24, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two new tracks 
Talk:Killdozer (disambiguation)

message: I find it weird that anybody calls it "Killdozer" when it didn't kill or even injure anybody. Is this really a widespread name for the thing? Google doesn't show me much besides killdozer.us and a few blogs. Everyking 14:59, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Merge with Heemeyer article and make this a rederction page for it. MathKnight 16:59, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Take a look: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8836881/Libya-rebels-build-huge-armoured-battering-ram.html 76.117.247.55 (talk) 19:58, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seen the word "killdozer" used in several contexts not listed here. The unifying concept is that they are all heavily armored bulldozers, designed for engineering and demolition in a combat zone. So I've added a "See Also" to armored bulldozers and combat engineering vehicles, which cover the general idea of improvised combat bulldozers.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syd Midnight (talk • contribs) 04:34, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new one!
Talk:Johann Georg Hamann

message: Does anyone have some serious sources on Hamann? There's almost nothing on him in English that doesn't have a serious POV (Isaiah Berlin's The Magus of the North etc.)
: Someone came up with some sources, but it seems more like a bibliography. Given the length of the article, which is about as long as the list of references, it doesn't seem credible that such a list was used to formulate it.  It would help if they were separated into two sections, those used to actually write the article (keep them in "References"), and those provided for further reading (call it "Bibliography" or "Further reading"). Bob Burkhardt (talk) 16:36, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This article needs serious revision to temper Berlin's POV (it is misleading to group Hamann primarily as a Counter-enlightenment author and especially misleading to describe his writing as wholly irrationalist) and to remedy a trampling-upon of Hamann's subtle views on the relationship between faith and reason. The Introduction to the Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy edition of Hamann's work, written by Kenneth Haynes (which I noticed in the Bibliography) contains a much more balanced and complete introduction to Hamann's life and work. It is true that he is easily misunderstood, perhaps deliberately so on his own part, but this account is a bit too extreme. I would like to revise it. However, I've never edited on Wikipedia before. -J. Wilkerson  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.126.83.169 (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: He was destined for the pulpit....
:"Destined is incorrect here, implying as it does an ultimate outcome, perhaps foreshadowed in some mystical sense. But Hamann did not become a clergyman.
:The German article, from which this one apparently was translated, says:
:::1746 begann er an der Königlichen Albertus-Universität Königsberg Theologie zu studieren. Später wechselte er zur Rechtswissenschaft.
:Accordingly, I changed our text to "Initially he studied theology at the University of Königsberg, but ...." – Sca (talk) 20:34, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Destined'
Talk:Solicitor General for Scotland

message: Being new to this and not having fully assimilated all the policies and guidlines, I did not realise the etiquette for adding Edit Summaries.  I have expanded upon the changed position of the Solicitor General following the creation of the Scottish Parliament.  In addition I have expanded the role of the SG in the prosecution of crime in Scotland.
--Rosskin 15:03, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apology
Talk:House

message: The first sentence of the History section strikes me as particularly weird. "Little is known about the earliest origin of the house and its interior, however it can be traced back to the simplest form of shelters." This is just not true. Archaeological research all over the world provides plenty of evidence for all kinds of houses from at least the Neolithic onwards, if not earlier. To give an idea, I linked to just one particularly fine example in Iraq from the fifth millennium BC. Some more work might be needed here. Zoeperkoe (talk) 09:08, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence History section 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Warle. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 26#Warle until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Certes (talk) 17:02, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Warle" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The "Medieval" subsection is very limited.  It only talks about the houses of aristocrats (manor houses, Italian palazzo, Beaufort House, etc).  Surely the far more numerous houses of the common people should be covered.  (And if there is a reason not to, that should be stated). Iapetus (talk) 14:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  History/medieval section  

message: House 124.105.196.68 (talk) 12:50, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arraling pang liponang 

message: Hello there,
I am James Harrisonn. I have a website named Articheture Ideas, I have a content relevant to this content topic and for that reason I want to put my content link on this page.
Hope your positive resonse.
Thanks and Regards,
James Harrisonn James Harrisonn (talk) 07:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  For get Backlink on a relevant content of our site