Talk:Florence, Arizona

message: I somehow find it difficult to believe that the population of Florence has shrunken by exactly one person between 2000 and 2005. First of all, even if you pretend that there has been no growth in the area, births and deaths within that time period make it very, very, very unlikely that the population would remain so close to the original number. Was the person who made that estimate doing drugs or something? Especially when you consider the enormous growth that Florence has been experiencing. --Node 01:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering the massive growth of Queen Creek which is just a few miles away this seems very wrong. BJTalk 02:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Something's wrong here. --Node 11:22, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No population growth? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Florence, Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015-3.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110531210815/http://www.naco.org/Counties/Pages/FindACounty.aspx to http://www.naco.org/Counties/Pages/FindACounty.aspx
*Added  tag to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527105027/http://www.azcorrections.gov/adc/datasearch/dr_faq.asp to http://www.azcorrections.gov/adc/datasearch/dr_faq.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:36, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Florence, Arizona. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160812143326/http://www.geogroup.com/maps/locationdetails/42 to http://www.geogroup.com/Maps/LocationDetails/42
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Florence, Arizona's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Census 2010":
From Bisbee, Arizona: 
From Top-of-the-World, Arizona: 
From Kalaheo, Hawaii: 
From Kenedy, Texas: 
From Winkelman, Arizona: 
From Globe, Arizona: 
From Stringtown, Oklahoma: 
From Fort Meade, Maryland: 
From Leupp, Arizona: 
From St. Johns, Arizona: 
From Clifton, Arizona: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Florence, Arizona]] 

message: I've fixed a problem of an undefined reference being invoked. The article contains this code:   Problem is, the reference "Census 2010" isn't defined in the article, and this causes the article to render with an error message in the references section: Cite error: The named reference Census 2010 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
We do have a reference for 2015 Census data, so I've switched to those numbers and that reference. Reverting this change simply replaces the un-cited information and the error about the missing citation. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:40, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing broken reference