Talk:Levi's Stadium

message: I've reassessed the article as meeting the Start-class guidelines. It is, however, pretty close to a B-class article.
The problems that I saw: The "Stadium Design" section uses an odd mix of tenses, including "was" and "will". It is also very unclear if this was only the design for the new (2006?) San Francisco stadium, or might also be recycled to used for the Santa Clara stadium design. [Also: Was there a different design intended for the 1997 version?]
Also: The "2006 plan" section looks to me if it is really two plans, the initial San Francisco plan, and the later Santa Clara plan. 
If these issues are cleared up, the article should be ready for a B-class rating. BlankVerse 06:57, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wanted this article to have an emphasis on the 2006 plan and the current slated stadium design, yet also provide a historical perspective on the 49ers' need for a new stadium by discussing the 1997 initiative. Do you have any ideas on how that could be structured better? -- ßίζ·קּ‼ (talk | contribs) 02:41, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment

message: There is some bias and unsourced information in this small section of the article that needs to be addressed.
It is obsolete. It is basically a baseball stadium with a football field. Seatings along what used to be the right foul line are now blocked by the east grandstand for football games as well as steel beams supporting the upper deck obstructing sight lines of seats on the lower deck.
It is also the oldest stadium in the NFL that has not been renovated or replaced. Heck, even Soldier Field and Lambeau Field, stadiums that are older than Monster Park, have been renovated.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.246.84.57 (talk) 08:04, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - I'm going to remove that unsupported assertion.  SixFourThree (talk) 15:46, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Section "Monster Park is obsolete"

message: 
*No consensus. There was no consensus for the move after three weeks. Fences&Windows 23:49, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move request 

message: There seems to be something wrong with the transportation table which results in it showing up just above the election results table.
I tried a couple of things, however fixing this seems to be beyond my wiki-editing abilities
Kevink707 (talk) 19:32, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thatotherpersontalkcontribs 01:01, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table Format Problems 

message: Under 'Opening', events are NOT listed chronologically (logically). And why mention somebody dying? People die at 'big' events all the time, so why is this worth a mention here? 66.81.253.124 (talk) 08:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Levi's Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/07/11/MNG03JT3ET1.DTL
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928071225/http://49ers.com/pressbox/news_detail.php?PRKey=2515 to http://49ers.com/pressbox/news_detail.php?PRKey=2515
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100227085604/http://www.supportourniners.com:80/stadium_design.php to http://www.supportourniners.com/stadium_design.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110927023648/http://articles.sfgate.com:80/2009-12-09/news/17182707_1_santa-clara-city-council-theme-park-amusement-park to http://articles.sfgate.com/2009-12-09/news/17182707_1_santa-clara-city-council-theme-park-amusement-park
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Levi's Stadium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140930234800/http://www.baytrail.org/STA-SC.htm to http://www.baytrail.org/STA-SC.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527124624/http://santaclaraca.gov/ftp/csc/pdf/49ers-20070424-stadium-proposal.pdf to http://santaclaraca.gov/ftp/csc/pdf/49ers-20070424-stadium-proposal.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527140519/http://santaclaraca.gov/ftp/csc/pdf/49ers-EFIR.pdf to http://santaclaraca.gov/ftp/csc/pdf/49ers-EFIR.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100404163026/http://santaclaraca.gov/ftp/csc/pdf/49er-stadium-FEIR/49ers-feir.pdf to http://santaclaraca.gov/ftp/csc/pdf/49er-stadium-FEIR/49ers-feir.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100423175129/http://santaclaraca.gov/ftp/csc/pdf/49ers-20100209-ballot-questions.pdf to http://santaclaraca.gov/ftp/csc/pdf/49ers-20100209-ballot-questions.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527124705/http://santaclaraca.gov/ftp/CSC/PDF/49ers-stadium-initiative-citizen-led.pdf to http://santaclaraca.gov/ftp/CSC/PDF/49ers-stadium-initiative-citizen-led.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111206052607/http://blog.49ers.com/2011/12/03/new-santa-clara-stadium-update/ to http://blog.49ers.com/2011/12/03/new-santa-clara-stadium-update/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: There are still links active in Google Earth and other resources that reference the old page "Proposed new 49ers stadium"  As this page no longer exists, I would suggest that it would be prudent to redirect this old page to the Levi Stadium page to avoid people hitting dead end links.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.220.152.66 (talk) 04:23, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Well... I don't think that rhat is a Wikipedian option. Maybe bring it up with WikiForge. Maccore Henni Mii! Pictochat Mii! 21:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest a Redirect to this Page 

message: It would be useful to know how large the field is, and therefore what size pitch can be marked out, especially for Soccer and Rugger -  which permit variations in size of pitch.
I am guessing that it cannot accommodate a full sized rugby pitch, which requires 80m wide by 154m long grass area. 2A00:23C6:54C4:3601:F119:5C72:BC78:36B8 (talk) 00:01, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question - how big is the grass field?