Talk:Ram Sharan Sharma

message: Please arrange for his photograph. ♔BADMIN♛ (आओ✍) 13:47, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Photograph needed

message: Please ensure that relevant information regarding Professor Sharma's major works is being deleted every often. Such vandalism should be protected. As a student of History I feel offended and alarmed that such a great scholar's page is being tampered with for any ulterior motive. If wikipedia wants to maintain its objectivity and impartiality as an encyclopedia it should be aware and alert to counter such vandalism. - A student of History.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.225.244.42 (talk) 12:36, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read WP:COPYVIO and refrain from reinserting publisher's blurbs. Relata refero (talk) 12:58, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: "Marxist" is a slur thrown around by the religious right in India. It basically means "anyone to the poltical left of Attila the Hun". Just because some critic gave the epithet "Marxist" to this author doesn't make it so. It's also interesting how this supposedly Marxist historian doesn't seem to have published anything about Marxism at all. --dab (𒁳) 20:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Marxist

message: mghori,
what you are adding is not "well referenced material". It is original research. You cannot yourself say sharma was wrong. Find a reliable source that calls him wrong, and use it to quote that "X says sharma was wrong on ayodhya". Stop calling others vandals, when they remove your POV filled original research additions. In fact what you are doing here (calling the hindu a indian version of xinhua like it is a fact?) is borderline vandalism and POV pushing. --Sodabottle (talk) 04:51, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: sharma says something; hc says something. thats the extent of what the sources say. if someone else says hc's views were opposite of sharma, then use it to source the statement "someone else says hc's views are opposite of sharma's". anything else is original research. And stop this whole paranoid anti-hindu  pro-china ranting. you are pushing your pov here.--Sodabottle (talk) 06:53, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

text: look at the current entry in the criticism section and how it reports a criticism. find someone reliable who calls sharma is motivated by such and such - add it in the same way. for instance "X has called sharma's stance on ayodhya is motivated by such and such". Th hc jugdgement is on the ayodhya issue and not on sharma. so find someone who is criticising sharma directly (i am sure you can dredge up elst or someone saying the same thing) and add it as X's opinion and not as fact--Sodabottle (talk) 07:31, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism 

message: Very very poorly written article. How can you make statements like 'demolished the myth'? Any historian can only give arguments for or against a theory. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.65.138.198 (talk • contribs) 
:  Changed the wording. - Kautilya3 (talk) 10:14, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor article 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ram Sharan Sharma. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110824205718/http://www.hindustantimes.com/Historian-Sharma-dead/Article1-735936.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/Historian-Sharma-dead/Article1-735936.aspx
*Added  tag to http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1624/16240890.htm
*Added  tag to http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/fline/fl1705/17050260.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090422150140/http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1416/14160600.htm to http://www.hinduonnet.com/fline/fl1416/14160600.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The bibliography is too exhaustive and it should have only major contributions as by WP.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MonkPupas (talk • contribs) 17:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography needs to be trimmed