Talk:Hack (term)

message: I'm not really sold on the temporal organization of the meanings; if someone wants to do it by order of most common use, that would be fine with me. I did it in temporal order because it made it less twisted and duplicative to explain the etymology. One advantage of temporal order is that we don't have to re-do the article over time, and the incidence of various meanings changes. Noel (talk) 22:11, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have to object to the idea that "hacking" is held in disrepute by those who do it. The words hack and hacking can absolutely be used to imply both positive and negative things. One would probably not proudly describe a large scale program or other kind of system as a hack. But a small program or a bright idea that is a small part of something bigger could very well be described as a hack and still be held in high regard. Hacking is also seen by hackers as one of the best ways to learning new things and for that reason alone seen as a Good Thing. Bergsten 23:16, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

message: I propose the "practical joke" meaning of "hack" be split off to Hack (practical joke), currently a redir with about 5 links to it. What do other people think? --Unforgettableid | talk to me 21:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: This article seems to be about cracking not hacking.
Hacking is a much older term meaning to use things for purposes they were not originaly designed for. For example putting a matchbook under your table to stop it from wobbling is a hack.
To get a program to work on windows that was meant for linux is a hack. To unlock features in a game that were not in the original design is a hack.
Perhaps this should be changed to a Crack (technology slang) article. Or perhaps I am wrong about this. HighInBC 18:44, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, the difference between "hacking" and "cracking" is an arbitrary one set by those who would rather have their own ideas left unmuddied by those who trek in darker waters. The fact is that many people think they fit the "true" hacker bill and that others are fakes who should go by a different name. ProfMoriarty 02:29, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The meanings of cracking and hacking intersect (e.g. at "ingenuously bypass access control").And while some subsume scriptkiddies etc. under hacking, no one claims that "using things for purposes they were not originally designed for" should be called cracking. So at most, cracking is a subset of hacking. Which I'd prefer to be expressed more clearly in this article, but I can't think of a good way to put it right now, so maybe someone else finds a way... 134.130.4.46 20:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hack vs Crack 

message: Take a look through:
* 
The origin of the term comes from MIT, where it meant something like "a clever solution to a problem," during the 1950s. The prank usage was much later. So what we have in this article is an accurate account of that later usage, but not the origins. -Harmil 20:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History is wrong 

message: I agree, history is wrong. It was John Nash who used the word as an insult and when he taught at MIT, the faculty and students picked it up from him.
You can find out more in the biography on him: http://books.google.com/books?id=0I0DqH5rXVEC&dq=a+beautiful+mind&q=hack#search_anchor
OMouse (talk) 23:49, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Nash used the word 

message: There is no need to have the image of the dome with the firetruck on it. 
It looks good on the MIT page but it has no relevance on the hacking page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.90.115 (talk) 19:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MIT image

message: How did the hacker put that there? Did he use a simple cut and paste? Kylee20051 (talk) 15:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Truck on top of building? 

message: In 1961 the MIT started using the new DEC PDP-1 (the very first microcomputer), so students were able to use the computer directly. In the early years, only doctorate students were able to have access to a million-dollar computer.
Later they realized computer can be used for another means (different to academic and scientific usage) for example games and music, spacewar was one of them if not the first.
Those programs (and games) were transmitted and shared (printed paper or punched card) among almost any national university. The limitation use and the incompatibilities between computer forced modifications or hacked out bits or whole sections of code for reuse.  So if you used some code that your hacked out of one program in a new program you "hacked" it. Thus the origin, as best I remember using it in 1962.   
Programs were hacked(modified as om the modern term "wrapped" versions)(or hacked out of previous programs, hence the popularization of the term hack. Later, hacking, hacking around, and other slang referred not just to copying and adapting those program, but also to updating, adding, and removing features.  To start , hacking was just to get a program to work on a new machine.
Spacewar itself was created by the (first?) hackers, since they overexploited a academic computer to create a amusement machine (videogame).
So, etymologically talking, Microsoft Office is not a hack(there are some exception, such Easter eggs present in many Microsoft products) but Counter Strike is a hack (because it is a game-mod).
--200.73.30.108 (talk) 20:01, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Technology speaking (programming)

message: I took a look through this artice two times, reading it aloud once. I found no grammar problems, should the tag be deleted?--Sgtlion (talk) 11:51, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Grammar problems?

message: I've removed the image of the fake fire truck atop MIT's Great Dome. As others have already pointed out on this page, this really has nothing to do with hacking in the field of technology at all. It is a prank, plain and simple, and calling it a 'hack' is exactly the sort of popular word abuse that ends up making pages like this inscrutable, with people falling over themselves to shoehorn unnecessary and obtuse definitions of terms into their associated pages. Rodeosmurf (talk) 06:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Fire Truck