Talk:Ionization

message: According to Dissociation (chemistry):
"[dissociation] is frequently confused with ionization."
But neither article explains the difference. Please reply at Talk:Dissociation (chemistry) Eleland 02:36, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissociation / Ionization 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:55, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: Does anyone know why ionization is spelt with a 'z' when the expected form would be 'ionisation' and 'ionise'?  This doesn't appear to be a regional difference as all textbooks that I have seen use the spelling listed in the article.Zebulin (talk) 00:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:ENGVAR. All my texts say "ionize" (even Atkins!). --Kkmurray (talk) 18:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's exactly what I don't understand.  Why is ionize universally spelt with a zed?  I've never seen it spelt ionise or ionisation anywhere even though we'd expect 'ion' to have such a suffix according to the pattern seen for all other words.  I'm aware that some generally use 'ize' instead of 'ise' for all such suffixes but this seems to be a case where everybody uses 'ize'. Zebulin (talk) 04:21, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: Isn't this article the right place to explain how the ions are produced in an FID? Is ionization during a chemical reaction called chemical ionization? – Rainald62 (talk) 21:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flame ionization 

message: Comment: The dot for element 85 At is missing from the graph for those of you who are studying this in detail.  76.212.128.2 (talk) 01:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small error on graph 

message: It is my understanding the ionization is largely a quantum mechanical effect. I feel like the section on classical ionization should be renamed to "Classical Model of Ionization". I also feel that sequential ionization should be put underneath the quantum ionization section because plenty of ionization models (ADK, PPT) treat only the problem of sequential ionization and they are in no way classical models. 
I also think the section titled quantum ionization about be better described by Photoionization (includes tunneling, mulitphoton, ATI, and any other ionization model that is due to electromagnetic waves). 
Do you think it is reasonable to include a section on collisional ionization and chaotic ionization?  
Lukealanjohnson (talk) 05:42, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classical Ionization Section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Ionization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141121115047/http://slchin-symposium.copl.ulaval.ca/MPublication/154_JPB_031_1215.pdf to http://slchin-symposium.copl.ulaval.ca/MPublication/154_JPB_031_1215.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141121115050/http://slchin-symposium.copl.ulaval.ca/MPublication/168_CPL_313_0789.pdf to http://slchin-symposium.copl.ulaval.ca/MPublication/168_CPL_313_0789.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:56, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I removed this primary source  Revert of IP edit here: . It doesn't seem to fit in this general article. Also, IP suggests potential WP:COI. --Kkmurray (talk) 01:48, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Projectile coherence