lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Incognito (1997 film)

message: I seem to recall reading that the movie was based in part on incidents in the life of the famous faker Han van Meegeren; in particular, the scene where he replicates a forgery in court, to prove his innocence of other (more serious) crimes (as van Meegeren actually did). Should this be mentioned in the article? (The use of old toy soldiers for the white lead, shown in the movie, is again related to the van Meegeren case - his use of 'modern' lead was one of the things which allowed later scientific testing to prove his fakes.) Noel (talk) 19:23, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Connection to real life
Talk:Uranium tailings

message: Why is this not merged with the main article -> tailings? 
Many aspects relate to tailings of uranium ore and other ores alike. (83.76.181.39 00:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The radioactivity aspect actually warrants some special considerations. I declined the merge. --Alvestrand (talk) 18:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, especially given the amount of federal legislation specifically concerning uranium tailings. Karmos (talk) 19:07, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not in (general) tailings?
Template talk:Show hide box

message: I didn't see anything like this as a template.  If one exists, please direct me to it so I can use it.  Thanks!  Kermitmorningstar 00:59, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other templates 

message: Doesn't seem to be working as advertised... trying a save instead of a preview... --Dan|(talk) 13:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed it & added the option to colour it in nice 'n' pretty. Jɪmp 08:28, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just want to set up some examples... 

message: I just deprecated this template since it is just another clone of .  In order to standardize Wikipedia, this template should not be used and we should just stick with the one we already have.  --CapitalR (talk) 05:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deprecated
Talk:Black Men United

message: Given that this group came together for exactly one song, it may make more sense to have an article about the song instead of the group. signed, Rosguill talk 06:06, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article framing
Talk:Forth Canoe Club

message: The article does assert notability (oldest canoe club in Scotland, largest in Edinburgh, founding member of national association).  Also, the page is not orphaned, there are links from three other pages. I am adding a reference to an external independent source and removing prod. Capmango 01:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There is no source for the assertion that Forth is the largest kayak club in Edinburgh - there is also an Edinburgh kayak Club. Also, of the three links  to this page, one is a redirect and another comes via that redirect, so there is only one 'real' link.Urchaidh (talk) 00:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability? 

message: I'm the new secretary of Edinburgh Canal Society (page to follow), and I have heard many accounts from our senior members that Kelso Riddell almost singlehandedly dredged and restored the Edinburgh end of the Union Canal when it was no more than a filthy, smelly hole, and no one else was interested in it.  
I can't see why this page is in "Transport". It should be in "Canals" or Canal restoration, or Sport. Renata (talk) 19:01, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I Interviewed him today and have a copy of the records they have from back when they did this so will be making some updates where possible. Riotshielder21 (talk) 15:25, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability? Nae, heroics! 

message: Renata (talk) 21:48, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: FCC's David Florence represents GB at Beijing Olympics -  surely notable?!

message: I think that the building in the picture may not be the St Andrew's Boathouse.   The picture shows the Edinburgh Canal Society one.   Is the St Andrew's Boathouse not the one which is up at Harrison Road Bridge?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suffragist (talk • contribs) 16:28, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe wrong title on photograph on this page (?)
Talk:Kapellbrücke

message: The Wasserturm (water tower) is no water tower in the sense of the article, but a part of the city fortifications. It is only named "Wasserturm" because it is, in contrast to all other towers in Lucerne, standing in the water. It does not, and never did, serve as a water reservoir!
I also doubt the given height a lot. The tower is never 140 m tall, rather 140 ft (~ 42 m). --178.192.166.119 (talk) 18:56, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water tower 

message: Shouldn't the age and date be mentioned in the introduction, since they are arguably the most important facts about the bridge. If I hadn't come here to read about the oldest wooden bridge in the world, I'd have started reading it and thought "oh, it's some old wooden bridge with paintings in it", and I might not have even gotten as far as the end of the introduction where it finally mentions "BTW, it's also the oldest wooden bridge in Europe". The date it was built and the fact that it's the oldest bridge should be stated within the first three sentences, in my opinion,
Idumea47b (talk) 00:12, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Build date
Talk:Robert E. Jones (judge)

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Robert Edward Jones was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 02:02, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:George Duvivier

message: why is this inappropriate for wikipedia?  one must assume that there was the reference to him beong gay.  big deal. if you really want someone to edit it into a style that is appropriate, well ask ron carter the bassist directly.  he knew him and played many times with him.
68.11.60.238 01:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Emasculator

message: If anyone wonders onto this page by mistake, he or she may vomit, because that damn bloody photo is rather shocking. Most urban people never seen an animal castration and children use Wikipedia extensively nowadays as a school homework preparation aid, etc.
Some kind of top warning, like "Don't scroll down if you don't exactly know what this page is about!" would be welcome. You can't assume Wikipedia is read exclusively by hardened man who have served in the military. Humankind also comprises of women and children! 91.83.35.58 (talk) 21:56, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You've made several insulting assumptions there.  Those aside, you cannot dress up what the device is used for.  Wikipedia is not censored.  Better that children know what happens to animals when they are domesticated, than believe that the world is all snuggles and sunshine.  Geoff B (talk) 03:13, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course you can dress it up.  You could remove the photo entirely.  It is gratuitous and unnecessary for this page.  You don't need, for example, a photo of someone being murdered to describe what the concept of murder is.184.64.156.253 (talk) 04:10, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Think of the children!
Talk:Jeri Weil

message: The photo currently shown on Jeri Weil's page is actually of Susie Mathers with her brother, Jerry. 
A quick Google image search on Jeri Weil and another on "Jerry Mathers family" will prove this. JeffoftheNE (talk) 22:35, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Image removed. Seasider53 (talk) 00:29, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The photo of  Jeri Weil... ?
Talk:Murder of George Duncan

message: Explain the connection between his murder and the law decriminalising homosexuality?172.132.179.195 22:52, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone please... 

message: I think that it is irrelevant speculation to say that this spot was a popular one for homosexuals to meet, due to homosexuality being illegal. Homosexuality is no longer illegal, and it remains popular amongst them to meet in out of the way places for casual sexual encounters.Royalcourtier (talk) 19:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dogging? 

message: References 6 and 7 (at least) are dead links.213.127.210.95 (talk) 17:20, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead links
Talk:10th Illinois Infantry Regiment

message: It looks like 10th Illinois Infantry Regiment (3 Year) and 10th Illinois Infantry Regiment (3 Month) are the same unit, with the 3 year article confusingly including the period under the 3 month enlistment in its history section. There are no hatnotes between them, nor a disambiguation page at the base name 10th Illinois Infantry Regiment, so the situation is untenable. These should be merged together then moved to 10th Illinois Infantry Regiment. Many analogous Illinois regiments have already include the 3 month and 3 year period in one article (e.g. the 11th) or have been proposed for merging (e.g. the 7th, 8th, 9th, and 12th. Having multiple, improperly disambiguated articles for different time periods of the same entity is confusing. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:57, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:9th Illinois Infantry Regiment

message: It looks like this is the same unit as that described at 9th Illinois Infantry Regiment (Mounted), it was just redesignated as a mounted infantry unit in 1863. Perhaps it was mustered out and reformed as mounted infantry with new soldiers, but I doubt it. In any case, the "mounted" article says it was formed from the infantry unit in 1863, but says they were at the Battle of Shiloh, among others, in 1862. Seems pretty clear this is a content fork, or at best, a poorly executed and unnecessary split. Warrants a merge in my view, but just wanted to make sure there wasn't anything I was missing, given the history of page moves and such here. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on my cursory reading, User:Mdewman6's assessment seems accurate (and I was the fellow swinging big page-move/category-discuss elbows last winter). At that time I noticed several articles which needed merging, didn't notice this one. Good eyes. I endorse actions which bring these three pages into one article titled as suggested. BusterD (talk) 00:38, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

text: Support merge, which seems reasonable; base title should then be at 9th Illinois Infantry Regiment. Hog Farm  Talk 15:56, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion
Talk:Iranian reformists

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. per consensus.  – robertsky (talk) 07:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Iranian Reformists →  – Per WP:NCCAPS and MOS:DOCTCAPS. Obvious preference for lowercase in RS sources. See related discussion at Talk:Iranian Principlists. I don't oppose other versions such as "reformists (Iran)" or "reformism (Iran)". (t · c) buidhe 05:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 24 January 2024
Talk:Economy of Erie, Pennsylvania

message: I recently removed 2 external links from the article. Pat replied to me on my talk page as follows:
:The links you removed provided useful additional information on the Erie economy. Maybe the wording looked like an advertisement, but the links highlight state development programs in Pennsylvania. You might have relocated the links to the External links section at the bottom instead of deleting them. I placed the links in context for ease of use.
::I agree with relocating them to the external links section. I removed the links because the root site was already referenced in the same section. I am fine with having these links in the article since they are not commercial sites. Anshuk (talk) 20:07, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 
Talk:Southie

message: James "Whitey" Bulger is from Somerville. Somerville is not a part of Boston, and is actually on the other side of Boston as south Boston.
:He moved to Somerville, and committed most of his crimes there, but he's originally from Southie.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twin Bird (talk • contribs) 23:40, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bound for Glory (book)

message: I've read the book and I dont recall much that relates to "the writing of his over 1,000 songs". It was about his poor childhood, travelling around the US as a Hobo on railway goods trains, some fruit picking (like The Grapes Of Wrath ) and at the end only a little about getting work as a singer. If you expect a lot of comment about him writing his songs you are going to be disapointed, so I've decided to delete that comment. (And sorry, but personally I found it a rather dull read, especially the too-long part about his childhood). 80.2.192.179 (talk) 13:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "the writing of his over 1,000 songs"
Talk:Fat soluble vitamins

message: This is just one paragraph of information. This can simply be merged into the main page, vitamins. However, if there is a great deal of more information, then I suggest we expand on it. -Omghgomg 07:33, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I support this. I can't think of much to say about fat-soluble vitamins; besides, the main vitamin article could stand to be a tad more in-depth. I can see this fitting into the "In humans" section. --Paul Kilgo (OEP) 13:32, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging

message: I would not suggest merging the info. If I want to know more about the other vitamins I will go to that page. This page could stand more data to fill it out. I'm not the one to do it, but I am glad I did not have to sort through a lot of detail on all vitamins to find it. Specialized info is a great help in research...it saves time!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.66.203.120 (talk) 19:34, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  For Clarity Keep it apart 

message: The following passage is ambiguous:
:If the diet contains too much vitamin A or D, however, the surplus will accumulate in the liver and may be harmful. Such excessive intakes are less likely to result from over-eating than through over-enthusiastic use of vitamin pills or dietary supplements.
Without giving more precise information, this amounts to a condemnation of supplements with no scientific basis.  Since there is a huge body of evidence also pointing to the benefits of vitamins, I feel this is unwarranted, at least in a stub about a technical point.  To resolve this without removing the above quote, I think the following should be included: 1) acute toxic doses of vitamins A, D; 2) chronic toxic doses and length of time necessary for toxic effect.  To my understanding these quantities are so large as to be unlikely to pose any threat (e.g. downing three bottles of vitamin A pills in one day, etc.).  If more convenient we can also just remove the quoted material. Neoprote (talk) 10:28, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How much is too much?
Talk:World Organisation for Animal Health

message: If it's now known as the World Organisation for Animal Health, then shouldn't this be moved to World Organisation for Animal Health]? Wikipedia convention is surely to use current names, and as far as I can tell OIE is still used officially but Office international des épizooties isn't. 81.159.57.7 (talk) 22:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 

message: There is a lot of methodologically robust, published science, in reputable academic journals, which has been subject to stringest peer-review processes, calling into doubt the intentions of this organisation, and demonstrating the validity of its claims to be negligible. The world organisation for animal health seems to promote the use of antibiotics, under the claim that current use is necessary to provide animal protein and thereby ensure humans have access to necessary food sources. This neglects the fact that we do not need animal protein to be healthy, that in fact what they are promoting is directly working against human health by promoting antibiotic resistance, and the sustaining the industrial scale animal agricultural industry does quite the opposite of this groups claims, namely improving animal health. References: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/amr-report/en/ http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/challenges/from-farm-to-table.html CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2013. Atlanta, GA: U.S Department of Health and Human Services, CDC. 2013; p.7, 36-7. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/amr-report/en/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CanisLupisArctus (talk • contribs) 03:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  I would like to suggest a criticism section will be necessary
Talk:Pleasant Bay, Cape Cod

message: My comments inside the << >> marks, commenting on the odd intro statement on this Pleasant Bay entry.
is a section of beach <<Wrong! PB is a BAY, not a section of beach. Not even close>> located in Orleans, Massachusetts <<WRONG! It is shared by Orleans, Chatham, Harwich and possibly Brewster (I think Brew. has a small sliver, not sure)>> . It is located of of Route 28 <<One side of it is>> and harbors 7,825 acres of saltwater when the tide is in <<maybe true, no idea>>.
I've lived and boated on Pleasant Bay my whole life. Wikipedia would be better off without an entry for PB instead of this dreck of an entry. Really bad. It needs deleting, or change it to be correct.
/really bad guys... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.48.222 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 11 June 2007 65.96.48.222 (UTC)
:I noticed the same problems and fixed them. In the future, feel free to edit the article directly. -- Beland (talk) 23:40, 2 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Baldwin Lake (San Bernardino County, California)

message: This article seems uncertain as to whether its subject is the actual lake, or the nearby unincorporated town, as evidenced by the "Community Improvement Association" section. Perhaps it would be best to split them into two articles (not that there is a lot of content, but still). Darkest tree (talk) 19:24, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lake or Town?
Talk:National Veterinary Institute (Sweden)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. To be reconsidered again when there are English-language sources presented as evidence for NAMECHANGES.  – robertsky (talk) 07:04, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: WikiProject Veterinary medicine has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Sweden has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment, do English-language news sources refer to the Agency by that new name to meet WP:NAMECHANGES? Otherwise the argument is WP:OFFICIALNAMES not to be used, or it may be just too early. DankJae 17:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 January 2024
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Roots music

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:She'll Be Coming 'Round the Mountain#Requested move 2 April 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject.  ASUKITE 17:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:She'll Be Coming 'Round the Mountain#Requested move 2 April 2024]]
Talk:1s Slater-type function

message: I really think this page needs to be modified somewhat. At the moment, it reads more like a collage of ideas rather than a cohesive article. The naming for this article is inspired from Szabo and Ostlund pg. 153 --HappyCamper 02:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts 

message: Slater functions are e^{-\zeta r} why one need integral of e^{-\alpha r^2}?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nassimi (talk • contribs) 16:57, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. In fact these two integrals (one for n even and one for n odd) are irrelevant to the problem, so I will remove them from the article. Dirac66 (talk) 18:26, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unneeded integrals 

message: It is very good that this page includes calculations. Unfortunately only results. If anybody should be able to fill out the equations step by step with numbers so everybody can see how to do the calculation that should be very helpfull to understand how to use the equations. Thanks in advanced.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.97.185.40 (talk) 10:08, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Calculations
Talk:Arvand Rud

message: This is a new page.  You may also edit on the Shatt al-Arab, if you wish.  That article can go their way and this article can go our way.  See, no conflict.  You do what you want, we do what we want.  Links to both articles.UTAFA 02:04, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But still a content fork and not an acceptable solution to an editorial conflict. Pascal.Tesson 22:51, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Crucibles

message: I removed this misplaced text from REDIRECT page:
"The Crucibles is a 4 piece band from south bucks England and plays Hardcore/Metal.Crucibles formed in mid 2006 and its founding memebers where Marcus Day and Sam Button.Crucibles was formed through a love of guitar and a thrive for better and faster guitar playing. The Crucibles bassist is Alex Patrick and they are at the moment in between drummers." Schmiteye 02:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cabo da Roca

message: i have an updated picture of the stone plaque i took while on vacation.  it's much more clear than the current one.  let me know if anybody objects to me putting it up. --DMW 02:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: i didnt hear any objections, so i posted the picture --DMW 21:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

message: "Much of the vegetation in this cape are low-lying and adapted to saltwater and windy conditions. Once home to a variety of plant life, Cabo da Roca has been overrun with the invasive plant species Carpobrotus edulis. This creeping, mat-forming plant, a member of the Aizoaceae succulent family, was introduced as ground cover by local residents several decades ago, but now covers much of the arable land on Cabo da Roca."
"low-lying" is a description of land,  not of vegetation.   It is common for one species of plant adapted to salty, windy, exposed conditions to replace other species over some period of time, particularly where the new dominant species has been "introduced" from some other area.   However it is implausible for such a species to take over "arable" land.   That means farm land,  not just some agriculturally-unused exposed heath land on the top of the cliff.  Is the land occupied by this weed really arable land ? Eregli bob (talk) 15:43, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Implausible assertion or poor translation ? 

message: The map location isn't showing. Could someone with more knowledge/experience than me fix it, please?
Aisteco (talk) 19:55, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map location