Talk:Dorothy Richardson

message: ==Untitled==
What is going on with the structure of this page? Why is all the biographical text crammed in at the top? There was a more conventionally structured edit buried in the past, but I don't want to revert away any useful changes to get back to it. I'm going to try and make the page conform to wiki style conventions, but if anyone can help then that would be great - as this looks like a big job. Retinalsummer (talk) 08:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Structure

message: What is going on with the structure of this page? Why is all the biographical text crammed in at the top? There was a more conventionally structured edit buried in the past, but I don't want to revert away any useful changes to get back to it. I'm going to try and make the page conform to wiki style conventions, but if anyone can help then that would be great - as this looks like a big job. Retinalsummer (talk) 08:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was most pleased to see the above comments. I did the major revision and the clumsy structure is in part, at least, the result of my feeling inadequate to write critically about Richardson's novels. I had hoped that someone who was better qualified to do this would jump in. Anyhow the editing is greatly appreciated and I hope to work further on the page -- but more carefully! Rwood128 (talk) 13:56, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Response

message: Dorothy Richardson is an underrated novelist and this article needs major improvement. I have upgraded the banners to indicate this. Rwood128 (talk) 16:19, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Dorothy Richardson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130613235055/http://www.dorothyrichardson.org:80/Society.html to http://www.dorothyrichardson.org/Society.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The Pilgrimage novel sequence is certainly notable in its own right. I think the article would be improved if the current "Autobiographical novel" section were split out into an article. Charles Matthews (talk) 17:43, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Charles Matthews, I have mixed feelings about your suggestion. There should be some discussion of Pilgrimage in this article and the article is still relatively short. I suggest that the section on the novel should be expanded if separated, and if the split is made a section should be added that discusses Pilgrimage. Thanks, and hope that you are able to work on this. Rwood128 (talk) 18:46, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I agree that the use of bullet points is awkward, but it was a first step in trying to improve the article. It's excellent that you plan to work further on this. By the way there is an article (stub) on Pointed Roofs. Shouldn't this perhaps be merged with the new Pilgrimage article? Rwood128 (talk) 11:11, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

text: Perhaps I'm just being perverse, but Richardson thought of what critics call her "novels" as "chapters" of one novel Pilgrimage, but I know this can create difficulties. Rwood128 (talk) 19:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pilgrimage split