lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:George H. Moody Middle School

message: Earl Binns is no longer the principal. Arthur Raymond is th enew principal of George H. Moody Middle School.
That is not a picture of Moody Middle School.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.199.193.41 (talk) 13:06, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make Corrections 

message: I do not like the idea to merge this article with Henrico County Pubic Schools. Henrico Count Public Schools is the school division, and George H. Moody Middle school is the school itself. We could just create a portal or a group.
► Wireless Keyboard ◄ 17:00, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merger with Henrico County Public Schools 

message: I removed this as non notable unless there is more to the story since this is very common. --Threeafterthree (talk) 21:29, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: support deletion. Active Banana  (bananaphone 20:23, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed non notable material about sexting

message: We cannot use material that is only referenced to the school's own website. We need third-party sources for anything beyond basic facts like the address. I will continue to remove anything that fails this criterion. --John (talk) 19:15, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: this is a valid statement. Active Banana  (bananaphone 20:24, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've looked for secondary sources, and can't find them - perhaps other editors can provide. In the interim, I've tagged the places where primary sources only were used (all of the references are such), and also tagged where items have no reference whatsoever (e.g., the Technology section). JoeSperrazza (talk) 15:53, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious problems 

message: Let's get this done, one step at a time. I know that it can be done, because it has been done before. Good luck to us all!74.110.198.236 (talk) 02:54, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Edits like this are not constructiveJoeSperrazza (talk) 03:06, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. When does the anonymous editor believe this article has previously been better? I didn't see it in the history, it looks like it has always been pretty poor. --John (talk) 03:47, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: His IP account was blocked. JoeSperrazza (talk) 05:25, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's get this article improved! 

message: I noticed that the redirect didn't seem definite. A few users back (not those sock puppets) tried to prevent the article from being redirected. I, like him/her, think that it is probably a local landmark. Anyway, I just wanted to mention that.Mountainous Terrain (talk) 23:30, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: and  are indefinitely blocked as sock puppets of  who is now blocked indefinitely. JoeSperrazza (talk) 23:59, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Plus . I suggest the editor should Wikipedia:Let it go. JoeSperrazza (talk) 00:03, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Redirect
Talk:Zama, Kanagawa

message: Wiki for Zama states: "The city is well known for its drinking water, which is cold in the summer and warm in the winter."
As a Zama City resident, I can confirm that this isn't true. Too bad because it would be nice...
It may be a localized phenomenon in other parts of Zama.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by OjisanUnit (talk • contribs) 05:11, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe set the phrase in quotation marks. Call it OR, but my intuition is it is a kind of local traditional proverb, putting in more poetic words the meaning "Summers are (usually) hotter than [whatever the average water temperature of springs and streams] is, winters are colder"; maybe with a deeper connotation of "nothing special about this place here", or "everything is just as it is supposed to be"?If it were an actual phenomenon where the water temperature would actually, and significantly, vary over time, there would certainly be citable sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:A62:14EB:6900:FCBA:4DDE:F191:F058 (talk) 01:38, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water 

message: Is there an official source in English claiming that the city bird is the great tit? I have not changed the main page in case this is the name the city itself likes to use but the actual emblem is parus minor which is the Japanese Tit not strictly the Great Tit (parus major).
This information is given on the Zama's website http://www.city.zama.kanagawa.jp/www/contents/1193392889882/index.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlanBrod (talk • contribs) 08:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  City symbols
Talk:Alan Jones (architect)

message: At the end of March 2020, Jones was reported to have temporarily stepped down as president of the RIBA citing issues in his private life, though there was subsequently reporting of a "serious incident" referral to the Charity Commission. There have been conflicting reports from reliable sources of why he stepped down and what the incident involves (some sources are firewalled so details are not always available); it is unclear if the CC referral is a statutory requirement if a senior figure steps back from governance, or if there has been any misconduct. Until things become clearer, I edited the article to briefly mention the claims made in these sources. An IP editor deleted some of the negative coverage, but I reverted the change to retain the reliable sources' assertions, and to maintain nPOV/balance. As this article is a BLP, I will be keeping an eye on the article and updating it if and when further information on this matter is published. Paul W (talk) 14:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Unexplained edit by IP user revert good faith edit for a second time. Paul W (talk) 14:13, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

text: User:BabyDory made identical reversion of my reinstated edit (suggests BabyDory could be the IP user). I have left a note for BabyDory on their User Talk page and asked if further edits might be discussed via this Talk page. Paul W (talk) 17:14, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  RIBA president
Talk:Gliese 876 b

message: Well written, well referenced with a great image to boot.  Promoted -- Samir   धर्म 10:52, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article

message: Since there is a discrepancy between astrometric and radial velocity determinations for the orbital inclination of this planet, I have removed inclination from the infobox and restored the lower mass limit value. Chaos syndrome 15:01, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclination and true mass 

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Planets and Moons" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. I would also recommend going through all of the citations and updating the access dates and fixing any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 10:17, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: There is no source given, a journal paper or anything else, for the specific claim in the article that Gliese 876 b's orbit lies within the habitable zone of Gliese 876. At 0.208317 AU it would receive about the same amount of bolometric illumination, or heat, as an object at 1.83 AU would receive in our solar system. That's far beyond the orbit of Mars, at the inner asteroid belt. Using Kasting et al.'s 1993 definition of a habitable zone, scaled down for Gliese 876, would place the inner edge of the habitable zone at 0.108317 AU and the outer edge of the habitable zone at 0.156204 AU for the system. That would put Gliese 876 c right in the middle of the habitable zone but Gliese 876 b at 0.208317 AU lies beyond the outer edge of the habitable zone. Just because Gliese 876 is a type III gas giant doesn't mean it's in the habitable zone.
:"Gliese 876 b lies within the habitable zone of Gliese 876 as defined by the ability of an Earth-mass planet to retain liquid water at its surface." Whose definition is that being used here? Certainly not Kasting et al. 1993's defintion as according to their defintion an Earth massed planet orbiting Gliese 876 at Gliese 876 b's distance would experience complete global glaciation, so no surface water! If Fogg 1992 is being used to define the habitable zone, 0.95 - 3.0 AU, to justify the claim that Gliese 876 b is in the habitable zone, then Gliese 876 e is also orbiting inside the habitable zone of Gliese 876. Scaled up, Gliese 876 e would recieve the same amount of bolometric illumination, or heat from its sun, as a body orbiting at 2.932 AU would in our solar system.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.186.181.123 (talk) 21:53, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Habitable Zone
Talk:Gliese 876 c

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Planets and Moons" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. I would also recommend going through all of the citations and updating the access dates and fixing any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 10:21, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: The image in the infobox should not be used as it does not follow the usage guide for the template:
 This template is part of a group of templates that are used to display information about a specific extrasolar planet.
 Images of published planetary properties are preferred where available, especially when they are available from cited publications.
 Artist's conception, regardless of the source, should be avoided.
 Examples of acceptable images include
 * direct images, such as one used for GJ 758 b, in the rare cases where these are available;
 * output of a model that is integral to a cited paper, such as the image used in HD 80606 b;
 * user-generated images that clearly illustrate published properties, such as the size comparisons currently used in GJ 1214 b or Gliese 436 b.
My edits followed these guidelines but were revered by User:MarioProtIV. I'm opening discussion as to why ...
--EvenGreenerFish (talk) 09:26, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I would like if the discussion was held here, rather then on all of the other pages. --MarioProtIV (talk/contribs) 11:12, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

text: The current image fails every guideline ever written for artist's conceptions and astronomical imagery.  The most explicit would be WP:ASTROART but there have been numerous discussions on this subject.  This image is so far from a reliable source and so far from representing any known features of the planet, it is ridiculous.  Lithopsian (talk) 17:54, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Planetbox usage
Talk:Gliese 876 d

message: This article talks about "extremely eccentric" orbit, yet lists the eccentricity as 0.  That's confusing.  I think the e=0 comes from Rivera et al.'s discovery paper (2005), where they fixed the eccentricity to zero in their model.  Does anyone have a better dynamic model that shows a real eccentricity?
--Alfredw (talk) 01:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets says, in footnote l, that it has no real eccentricity. --Zimriel (talk) 01:18, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Orbit

message: Can we have a moratorium on temperature and radius speculations in planetboxes? Gliese 876's planets do not go into secondary transit behind their sun (like Gliese 436 b), and are not hot enough to reflect hotter temperatures on one side than the other (upsilon Andromedae b). Hypothetical temperatures can go into the main text with the reasoning behind them ("if the atmosphere was like this and the albedo was x, then the temperature will be y").
I don't like edit wars but this stuff annoys me. Wikipedia isn't Extrasolar Visions, boys and girls.--Zimriel (talk) 15:41, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Essential Properties

message: As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Planets and Moons" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. I would also recommend going through all of the citations and updating the access dates and fixing any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 10:26, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps Review: Pass

message: A screenshot from Celestia containing a guess at the appearance of both the star and its planet, as well as no indication of scale, doesn't add anything useful to this article. I think it should be removed.  121.45.217.207 (talk) 04:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Celestia Image 

message: I don't know if it should go on this page, but here is an image recently released by NASA, it's drawn by an artist, but still.
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap120429.html
I am not good with inserting images, so I will leave this for someone else. 76.19.18.25 (talk) 01:39, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides the fact that this picture is more speculative than informative, it is not a NASA work and is copyrighted and thus not suited for uploading to Wikipedia. -- Karl432 (talk) 08:12, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo to add?
Talk:2009 NCAA Division I women's basketball tournament

message: Clearly in error, will track down error and fix this weekend. It is too small to distinguish entries, need to make it a little large - but need to learn how to format the list. Sphilbrick (talk) 13:49, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Automatic team map
Talk:Boomer (Battlestar Galactica)

message: Why this article and Lieutenant Boomer?
Xx236 13:03, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's intended as a disambiguation page, since there are two versions of the Boomer character: Lieutenant Boomer and Sharon Valerii. But it does have a little too much information for a disambiguation page; I guess it could be trimmed. The problem with deleting it is that there's another disambiguation page, Boomer, with one link to this page; if we delete this we need to create another entry on that page, so that there's one for each version of the BSG character. Darthmix 18:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twice the same 

message: Yeah, wasn't sure how best to handle it. Totally good with a redirect to the general disambig page. Only found this through the double redirect page. SamStrongTalks (talk) 13:13, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think your way is the best, since we have (Battlestar Galactica) disambiguator in the title it should be a disambiguation page about relevant Battlestar Galactica terms. We can add a see also to the general disambig page though, which I'll do now. Cheers Polyamorph (talk) 13:48, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig vs redirect
Talk:Alan Hart (writer)

message: For future reference, the origin of this article was a copyright violation posted in the Alan Hart (different person) article here. Source. It appears to be, as the original editor claimed, his book publisher's biographical sketch, but makes some extraordinary claims, so proceed with caution. --Dhartung | Talk 19:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say we should probably look for a better source before allowing that stuff back in.  Statements like "Zionist lobby's awesome influence" indicate a need for NPOV precautions. — ceejayoz talk 20:31, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: I couldn't pick, so delete the one you don't want. --Yono 04:17, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub Type

message: There's no need for caution where statements are made by people (or in this case, their agents/publishers) about their opinion. If the source speaks of "Zionist lobby's awesome influence" then something along these lines needs mentioning.
Meanwhile, there is no obvious link to Christian Zionism that I know of or can find - and the link to an article by Alan Hart "offering his prescription for resolution of the perennial problem of anti-semitism" is dead and I can find nothing on the web that it might be. These inclusions could have been carried over from the earlier confusion between this Alan Hart and other famous people of the same name. Both should almost certainly come out.
Interestingly, the guy was reporting for ITN (British news, independent but government regulated and then on a par with the BBC) at the time of the Six-Day war and describes as fact Moshe Dayan threatening to sink the USS Liberty some 16 hours before the attempt was made. He went on to work for the BBC and claims to have been an unofficial envoy between President Carter and Yassir Arafat. PRtalk 13:04, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lots of information available
Talk:Maceo Baston

message: Baston's contract with the pacers is worth 1.8 million, not 3.  There is also a player option for the 2nd season.
Redmid17 19:42, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It is no longer possible to comment on ratings due to a backlog. Please put any comments/questions on my talk page. GDon4t0 16:04, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP Bio Rating
Talk:Jessica Taylor

message: "Jessica has recently appeared on 'The Weakest Link: Celebrity Special', becoming the strongest throughout and narrowly missing out at the end. If Liberty X were to split, than we can be certain to see Jessica release some solo material." - Written with personal opinion, conjecture and mere speculation. Snellios 22:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opinion and speculation 

message: All the links added to this article send you straight to webpages/fansites about Liberty X. There's nothing wrong with that, I guess, but it would be nice if someone were to add a couple of links to websites that are specifically about Jessica Taylor herself (if indeed there are any such sites).Teebs101 05:48, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: In the box thingy it says she was born in Preston but in the personal life section it says she was born in Oxford. Which is it? 94.197.235.229 (talk) 00:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 
Talk:Open drain

message: There's no reason to categorize the open-collector or open-drain as an output in only digital design. I've added a plug to that hole in the two articles, but I don't know how to change the categorization or the description immediately following the subject. Python2k (talk) 16:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [edit] Definition too restrictive

message: Both are available in certain microcontrollers and it would be useful to be able to see the difference in this article ZedZzizz (talk) 05:32, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about p channel open drain versus n channel open drain 

message: Near the beginning of this article is a sentence that states “The word "drain" in the term "Open-drain" refers to the drain terminal of a transistor.”  This is a misleading statement as a transistor does not have a “drain.”  Instead the sentence should associate “open-drain” with MOSFET types devices which do have a terminal called drain. Armstrong1113149 (talk) 02:20, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transistor vs MOSFET
Talk:Fussa, Tokyo

message: I was stationed at Yokota Air Base in the mid 1950's. Fussa is not part of Tokyo. When I was there it was quite smallMain source of reveue was related to the Air Force people on the base. It was a very, very high security base. It cintained my squadron, 56TH Strategic Reconnaisaance, as well as the 98th Bomb Wing, and a squadron of F-86 fighters. There was an Army presence whose job it was to protect the base should there be an attack. Inasmuch as Fussa existed long before my arrival I do not understand how it can be said that it was founded in 1970.
Travel between Fussa and Tokyo was accomplished by taking the train from the Fussa Station, with a change of trains in Tachikawa. Fussa, if I recall, was some 30-35 miles northwest of Tokyo. We often had a superb view of Mt. Fuji.
When you left the main gate of Yokota you walked through rice paddies to get to town. At the end of the paddies was a shop that sold Noritake china. You then walked down a hill to a main street which was 100% bars, on both sides of the street. Wait...there was also a small reataurant. That street led, ultimately, to Fussa train station. Across the traiLouBorok 03:24, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: current data concerning Fussa, Japan
Talk:Mezz Mezzrow

message: He's one of the only people I'd ever heard of to "choose to identify as black" in that era. Or maybe in any era as people claiming to be black or American Indian or what have you is usually offensive in this era. I assume it was rather strange then too, but possibly just seen as a personal eccentricity. How accepted was he in the black community? Did they just see him as some crazy white wannabe? (Which maybe he was, I don't know)--T. Anthony 03:52, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was sort of a solidarity thing in that era. Mezzrow, like Johnny Otis later on, decided to identify as black. The "wigger" thing that seems to bother so many now basically started during the "beat" era with the likes of Norman Mailer and his racialist "White Negro" treatise.JBDay 20:01, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Race deal

message: Like others before me (see above), i found this page to be critical of Mezzrow's musicianship without actually citing his lengthy career in music. It was a quick matter to look up some discographical sources, find an interview with his son, and bring his career and personal life into better focus, thus placing the musical criticism in perspective. I hope that the hour and a half i spent on this task is well received. I did my best and will now move on. -- catherine yronwode, not logged in, because it is Sunday morning and i had no idea i was going to spend so much time on this bio just because i happened to mention to my husband that my father knew and bought pot from Mezz Mezzrow in New York back in the 1930s and that Mezz was Jewish. In other words, i came for the photo and stayed for the editing. Sheesh. 75.101.104.17 (talk) 20:24, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added references and links
Talk:Almanach cracoviense ad annum 1474

message: Not to split hairs, but is it really an incunabulum if it only is a single printed sheet? cbustapeck 19:53, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to incunabulum, yes. Appleseed (Talk) 19:36, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Single printed sheet