lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sukyo Mahikari

message: I recently read Religion and Cyberspace and Japanese New Religions, which are sources currently cited on this page, and will be making some edits based upon these books. For any questions about this content, please comment here. Orlivia (talk) 01:59, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Sources

message: The article about mahikari is far from being neutral.
It mixes and distorts some of their concepts with some ones pesonal interpretation regarding the topic.
It´s not about agreeing or desagreeing with the contend, but pointing out the way it´s presented.
words like: a lot, many... show how are we adding to the facts our personal opinion. And this should not be happening in a wikipedia page.
Being neutral is really a challeging task. When we tell or write a fact, we tend also to include some of own values and personal views, but the purpose of wikipedia, as far, as I understand it, is to inform, leaving aside personal opinion.
Religions are in fact very delicate topics.
But being neutral should be the goal and if a page is incapable of it, whould be removed or re-written.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Exs sky (talk • contribs) 18:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  not neutral opinion 

message: :Best to gather that information based on reliable sources and insert section on criticism. Per definition it is a new religion. Based on that definition there are a few orgs that are considered cults but the term cult is conflict burden on Wikipedia.--Catflap08 (talk) 21:00, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  edits 21st january 

message: Mahikari is a real cult and listed here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governmental_lists_of_cults_and_sects
So you are wrong!
N1gh7r4v3n (talk) 21:08, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Again with all due respect please rad the guidelines an get familiar with Wikipedia. If not I will have to report you for vandalism. --Catflap08 (talk) 21:12, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit again because you are wrong! 
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Community: A NewOrderOnline Tribute

message: Well, actually it's a lot more than that, it's probably the best tribute existing for the band New Order... and to say it's from "a few fans" isn't really what it was.
I was just updating the New Order discography, wanted to add the tribute albums as well.
This is a very serious album actually, sponsored by the band themselves... I think it was worth being included in wikipedia due to the "nature" of the project being very original.
Sure isn't for commercial reasons, this album is out of print. But it's nevertheless one to add for the discography section of New Order
*Why don't you put this comment on the votes page, and don't forget to sign it with 4 ~s like ~~~~ Kappa 23:38, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why would it be deleted?
Talk:Hepburn (surname)

message: I personally think that this article should either be about Hepburn as the family name, with other parts moved to Hepburn (disambiguation), or that this should be left as the disambig page and the information at the top moved to Hepburn (family name) or Hepburn (name). Any thoughts? Either way, the link to Hepburn romanization in the very first line should be moved, it implies there's only one other thing to do with Hepburn, not many. Satan's Rubber Duck 19:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree.  Hepburn romanization is not only a very common use of the word "Hepburn", but probably the only one where it's common to use the word "Hepburn" alone ("that document is written in Hepburn", "this IME supports Hepburn", etc).  If you look at what links here, you'll see dozens of Japanese articles doing just this. (Of course, they should be linking straight to Hepburn romanization, but this calls for a very visible redirect link, not something buried two pages down in the Hepburn family tree.) Jpatokal 12:03, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, Japanese writing is admittedly an area I know absolutely nothing about, I hadn't heard of the term before. How about my first idea then - moving the large paragraphs to Hepburn (family name), replacing it with something like "Hepburn is also a common family name, go here for information on the history of the name". I don't normally mind when disambig pages have extra info on them, but this had enough that I didn't even realise it was a disambig page for a bit (hence my confusion). Satan's Rubber Duck 02:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

text:  I think that the Hepburn is the most well known as the surname. Also, the changes made on the article were nearly all correct. I think that any person with an account, should be allowed to edit it as they please, as I am aware many Wikipedia administrators do not know about the topic of the surname, and it is mostly right. I also think that before the changes are deleted, the user should be consulted, so he can back up his evidence. 05hepburn4 13:36 10 July 2007 (05hepburn4 12:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chris Mackenzie

message: I had originally tagged this nn-bio, but then upon closer reading, I guess this article is about a footballer.  So it might be an assertion of notability.  Friday (talk) 14:19, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Executive information system

message: I would suggest this not be merged as these are two separate types of systems, and i was searching for specifically strategic information systems when i came across this proposed merge. I would not have foun it immediately were I to have searched for it and cme up with executive information systems.
Thanks, Josh  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.31.50.100 (talk) 15:12, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Several URL referenced at the end of the page are broken.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.240.252.11 (talk) 17:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  URLs
Talk:Ballona Creek

message: I thought that Ballona Creek ran to the ocean... I don't believe it is a tributary of the L.A. River. In fact, it is a historic course of the L.A. River, prior to a great shift during the flooding of 1825. Does someone actually have a source saying Ballona flows into the Los Angeles River? Mike Dillon 14:35, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
:There would not be such a source.  I know this because I live about a mile from the creek, and it most definitely does not flow into the L.A. River.  I have fixed the article accordingly.--Slightlyslack 00:00, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tributary? 
Talk:Low Desert

message: I disagree with the suggestion to merge. The term "Low Desert", AFAIK, is almost exclusively associated with just the California portions of the Sonora Desert, and excludes those portions in Arizona and Mexico. BlankVerse ∅ 14:42, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: After consulting with a couple of Wikipedia editors who live in the area, I've removed the merge request and done some copy-editing that I hope makes things clearer. BlankVerse ∅ 13:57, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I respectfully disagree.  I live in the Phoenix, Arizona area and admin a low desert gardening group. All Master Gardener documents and documentation from the University of Arizona distinguish areas here as low desert, intermediate desert, and high desert.  I had never heard of these terms being exclusive to California. Wca42 (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: In Arizona, local usage is: 
*Low Desert = Phoenix, Yuma, Colo River towns (500 - 1500 ft elevation)
*Intermediate Desert = Tucson & vicinity (+/-2500 ft el) = Sonoran Desert Uplands
*High Desert = Navajo Res, Arizona Strip (+/- 5000 ft el)
Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 04:16, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not just California 
Talk:Old New Synagogue

message: I had heard that, during World War II, Hitler planned to make this synagogue into a museum describing the history of Jews in Europe (which he of course intended to put an end to).  Does anyone else know anything about this? --Jfruh 14:47, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hitler's museum

message: how exactelly you find " verifiable source " for legend?
Just read article about Golem of Prague.
71.99.122.149 (talk) 05:41, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:   verifiable source for LEGEND? of Golem 

message: I had read that the Altneushul had a room where women worshiped separately, led by a female cantor.  Can anyone expand on this?  Josh-Levin@ieee.org (talk) 03:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is actually aron hakodesh in the room for women (called "weibershil" in Yidish). Although it could be used by women, I think this is unlikely. My explanation is, this part of the synagogue was used in winter, because it was easier to heat it up. AsiBakshish 03:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Women's Synagogue 

message: I am a student of Jewish History and in the scholarly literature on the topic it is usually referred to as the Altneuschul. I was wondering if it would be okay to add the name Altneuschul to the page title? --Nbsiegel22 (talk) 19:11, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altneuschul-Old New Synagogue 
Talk:Evening Standard Pub of the Year

message: I am unable to find a definitive list of Pubs of the Year on the Internet. The names in the article are my efforts from Googling! There seems to be some discrepencies, so feel free to change if you find any concrete information --Jamesedmo 14:59, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Definitive List

message: I've had an email saying The Cow Saloon Bar and Dining Rooms was the winner in 2000, not The Builder's Arms. Winedine.co.uk suggests The Builder's Arms was in the top 5, not the winner. I can't find any source to support The Cow Saloon Bar winning it but the person who wrote to me says the Cow Saloon is his pub and they have the plaque on the wall to prove it. Not exactly a citable source, but I've added that pub to the listing on this basis. This page really needs some references. Angela. 13:37, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who won in 2000?
Talk:Baroreceptor

message: Some of the information in here is more suited to the Baroreflex article, so I am moving there.David Henderson 15:11, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Some

message: We can find Baroreceptors also in the body of other mammals as dogs. Look here:   
* Schwartz PJ, Vanoli E, Stramba-Badiale M e coll. Autonomic mechanisms and sudden death: new insights from the analysis of baroceptor reflexes in conscious dogs with and without a myocardial infarction. Circulation 1988; 78: 969-73. --Puzza87 (talk) 17:42, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Not only humans
Talk:Tadeusz Stefan Zieliński

message: he was born in russian empire, in ukraine, was known for his translations of greek literature into russian, moved to poland after the revolution and he is now a 'polish philologist'. he didn't even stay in poland but died in germany
also the article is poorly written by some, i suppose, pole and its grammar needs some clearing  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.118.64.60 (talk) from Russian Federation, 13:40, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  kind of funny
Talk:Ländler

message: MarSch recently redirected this article to Music of Austria, having moved its contents there. I have restored the article. I really feel the subject deserves an article of its own. Of course, the dance should be mentioned in the Music of Austria article (though whether it needs as much detail as is there now is another matter), but the size and importance of the subject, as well as the liklihood of somebody looking for information specifically on the Ländler, is easily such that it should have an in-depth article of its own as well (the stuff in the article now is really just a starting point--much more could be written). And apart from anything else, the Ländler is neither exclusively Austrian nor exclusively musical (it is, after all, a dance). --Camembert 15:26, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I concur, this article should be separate from Music of Austria. --Overhere2000 (talk) 18:35, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Regional Council (Hong Kong)

message: Has anybody got anything, such as a library card or a picture of an old litter bin with the logo of the Regional Council on it? Thanks. :-D — Instantnood 15:34, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
The logo on the library card is split into two halves and the colour of one half is reversed.
HenryLi 01:42:47, 2005-09-06 (UTC)
:Can you upload a picture of it? Thanks. — Instantnood 20:56, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep.  Better yet, link to the source so it could be verified.--Mintchocicecream 22:18, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Ornithologists

message: This category is getting very full. Is it time for :Category: British ornithologists and :Category: American ornithologists, to join the existing :Category: German ornithologists, and :Category: British naturalists? Andy Mabbett 15:37, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've created the former. Andy Mabbett 19:47, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Time to split?
Talk:Peppa Pig

message: The redirect Peppa Pig TM has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 05:25, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Peppa Pig TM]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: pepper pig is a psychopath that hunts down kid’s and loves eating bacon.
: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. User:CanonNi (talk|contribs) 01:21, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 April 2024 

message: Sarah Ann Kennedy is the voice of Miss Rabbit and this seems to have been omitted from the area that says 'Starring'. Please can you put my name back. 193.61.243.228 (talk) 16:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Jamedeus (talk) 18:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2024 

message: Should we make a page for the Peppa Pig franchise or add it to the highest grossing franchises page? or no 50.168.185.122 (talk) 23:07, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question
Talk:Jedermann sein eigner Fussball

message: *hatii.arts.gla.ac.uk
*arslibri.com
related:
*Germany 1916-33: A Selective Chronology
*:de:Malik-Verlag
*infos and multimedia files on John Heartfield at towson.edu
--Tickle me 09:44, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Fimo

message: The article reads to me far too much like an advertisement written by the manufacturer for commercial reasons.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.100.213.3 (talk) 08:45, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I botched my comments when submitting changes to the article just now, but basically I added headers to break the article into sections, then added content under Technique and Surface Treatments. Pladuk 00:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded article and added structure 

message: So Fimo contains PVC and various plasticizers that are non-toxic when used in the intended manner... but exactly which substances are used as plasticizers? I can't seem to find this information anywhere, as non-toxic ingredients are often omitted from the MSDS. Now I realize the exact proportions would be a trade secret, but surely the basic ingredient list must be out there somewhere. 
99.118.9.251 (talk) 07:01, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ingredients? 

message: 64.229.77.249 (talk) 21:58, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sounds like a company handout
Talk:Evolutionary game theory

message: I see a nice formula p(x)=e^(-x/V)/V and keep wondering what "x" stands for. Formulas should be annotated in situ. Hunting the whole text for an explanation is a waste of  time!— Preceding unsigned comment added by MilanCela (talk • contribs) 12:29, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formulas are not properly annotated
Talk:Kleinwort Benson

message: 1. List of significant deals to exemplify the part KB played in, for example, the British Government's privatisation programme of the 1980s and 1990s
2. Section on Kleinwort Benson involvement in railway financing, from 1840 up until Eurotunnel
3. Brief history of the various constituent companies: Drake, Kleinwort & Cohen, Kleinwort, Sons & Co., Robert Benson Lonsdale etc. Done --Dominic Sayers 10:06, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  What else is needed 
Talk:LCD Soundsystem (album)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 15:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: I am not sure that we should consider Disc 2 of the 2-CD set as part of the album itself.  It is a bonus disc, and not available on all versions of the album.  CD versions with a black background and a white disco ball do not feature the singles collected on Disc 2, although a later release with the black cover does feature "Yr City's A Sucker" as a bonus track.  Also, vinyl versions of the album do not feature the singles.  IIRC, the CD was originally issued solely on DFA with the black cover and without the singles disc.  Later on, it was issued on DFA/Capitol with a white cover and the second disc.  This may be nitpicking, but it has always seemed to me that the second disc of collected singles is not part of the album proper, and should be listed as a bonus disc. --Leamanc (talk) 09:19, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The white cover with the second CD was the original release in 2005.  The black cover with only the first disc was released in 2007. .  I agree the album "proper" is only the first disc, but the second disc is never listed anywhere as a "bonus", merely a collection of the early singles and their b-sides.Plum743 (talk) 08:50, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the singles really be counted as part of the album?
Talk:Losing My Edge

message: I think we need a list of bands that are named in this - if I have time I'll do it later.. Secretlondon 16:27, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: This track famously lists lots of bands - most of which I can disambiguate. However there are a few which I haven't heard of and as both bands are red links I can't determine which one was meant.
*The Trojans - Trojan Records? Trojan (band)?
*The Outsiders (Dutch band) or The Outsiders (American band)? Secretlondon 05:20, 4 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't heard the song, but judging from the other artists listed, I'm almost completely certain it was the Dutch Outsiders that were referred to. The American Outsiders were just too square to be liked by the same type of people that are into Can, The Monks, and The Sonics. —Chowbok 05:17, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure it refers to the British punk band. Aroundthewayboy 06:38, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Which bands?

message: The article was linking to Niagara (band) but this is a French pop duo that broke up in 1992. By the looks of the other artists, I have redirected the link to Niagara (artist) who appears to be the more likely person. However if by chance it is the French group on this CD (after all the Beach Boys are listed, too) then please revert my change. 23skidoo 21:57, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Niagara

message: Did anyone notice that the song mentions being at the first can show in 1968, but the Wiki for James Murphy indicates that he was born in 1970?
24.80.160.120 21:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *gasp* Maybe he wasn't really there? Secretlondon 21:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Confusing Lyric
Talk:Open Season (Sea Power album)

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 00:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: <^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>

message: Is there any way that the organ version of "How Will I Ever Find My Way Home?" could be imported from the CD onto iTunes (or any other music playing software, for what it's worth)?—Obi-Jon 00:47, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Organ

message: Not only is the article unsourced, it has very little content beyond a track listing and the credits. There is no overview over the album's Critical reception, there's no track discussion... See Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums#Article_body for what album articles should cover. --Fritz S. (Talk) 09:08, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination
Talk:Data center

message: This is incorrect.  The standard isn't having non-working fire protection "plans" on municipal papers.  The law requires qualified electricians, not PC people, to insure the wiring is safe to it's ampacity and proper fused.  Then also the fire marshal agrees the equipment doesn't catch itself on fire nor can it catch neighbor equipment on fire.  Those are non-pc "non-electronics" skills.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:143:480:A4C0:4ECC:6AFF:FE8E:47D (talk) 22:40, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Fire Protection

message: Fixed your grammar mistakes, created an account, and then fixed the rest.
Any major errors should hopefully be fixed (used Grammarly and my own common sense here)
if you have any problems with my edits, reply to this with them, please. Grammer Nerd (talk) 01:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: My edits have, thus far, reached up to Uptime Institute – Data center Tier Classification Standard, please verify that my edits are correct both in relation to the subject matter and also grammatically.  Grammer Nerd (talk) 00:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  47.204.241.60 here 

message: The redirect Air flow management has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:19, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Air flow management]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Platypus (band)

message: In my revision of the Platypus (band) article, I removed the Dream Theater template from the bottom of the page. This was done on the grounds of the fact that I see no reason why Dream Theater's discography, videography and past and current lineup should be in an article only partly related to Dream Theater. This has been discussed (and agreed on) on Plattopus' talk page. Plattopus was the user who created the Dream Theater template, and implemented it on the Platypus page in the first place. Lappado 16:36, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine. I just added it because the list of side projects was featured in the templates, so I figured that pages linked in the template should have the template in them too, but either way is fine with me. --LodeRunner 04:40, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  My removal of the Dream Theater template 
Talk:Mylodon

message: Three paragraphs were added by  in November 2004.  These paragraphs came from http://www.peacecorpswriters.org/pages/2001/0105/photos105/mylo.html, which translates a Spanish language article on http://www.paleolatina.com.ar/ by Ricardo Pasquali (now defunct).
I have removed those three paragraphs.  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 16:50, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The original author did not appear so far, so I fixed it. This time the "Magallanes" disambiguation page has a link to a certain region of Chile, which is also mentioned in that mylo.html. saimhe 01:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Partial copyvio