lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Acid Eaters

message: This is not copyright infringement. The similar article referenced at http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A907102 was written by me. To prove this, I've written the phrase 'Hello Wikipedia!' at the very top. Also, if you click on my h2g2 username in the 'Edited by' section it will take you to my personal space, where I have linked to Wikipedia. Burn the asylum.
lol. Cool, thanks. Angela 09:23, Nov 8, 2003 (UTC)
:I think the original artists of the songs on the CD should be mentioned. 85.226.122.205 02:52, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for your suggestion!  When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make whatever changes you feel are needed.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit any article by simply following the  link at the top. You don't even need to log in!  (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold.  Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly.  If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. Jkelly 02:53, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this new article taking a look back at the Ramones' Acid Eaters. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the review and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the professional reviews section on this page, or, alternately, as an external link on this page. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! (mixed) Mike harkin (talk) 19:39, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Professional review / external link suggestion
Talk:1932

message: I am interested in knowing how many people were born in the United States in the year 1932, specifically the month of February and how many of those people are alive today.  Or up today 2002 
:Number of human births and deaths worldwide, along with what was then the world population, would be a useful addition to each year article. Best name (talk) 16:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many births? 

message: As per discussion at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Years the year in topic paragraph is scheduled to be deleted as it largely duplicates the links in the top box, and is not consistent with other year. Any objections should be made on that page please --BozMo|talk 19:32, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year in topic 

message: [See: Talk:1950#Format.  -Wikid77 13:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format 

message: This article gives Baron Hutton's date of birth as 29/6/1932, but his own article says 29/6/1931 - anyone know which is correct?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chile Nose Jam (talk • contribs) 01:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Brian Hutton, Baron Hutton]] 
Talk:Answering engine

message: Good start! Is any of this stuff operational or is it still in the research stage? -- Viajero 12:48, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: well, i guess Ask Jeeves is pretty operational, but it's a bit on the stupid end (templates), not to say that stupid is bad, just that not as interesting Kowey 13:11, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC)

message: The entire "Answer Questioning" paragraph in the Deep section is pretty inscrutable. Almost every sentence is complicated, but doesn't seem to actually say much of anything. It also uses an unexplained symbolic system, one example being "1(Q) = (∞(A)-∞) = 1(A)". What is this supposed to mean? Can someone rewrite the whole paragraph? - dcljr (talk) 22:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Answer Questioning 

message: I tagged this for a rewrite. Is a disaster or errors... Just take the simplest issue, it says: "The first QA systems were developed in the 1960s and they were basically natural-language interfaces to expert systems" But as the Wikipage on expert systems states (one of the few correct statements there!), those only appeared in the 1970s. Then the comedy of errors here continues... History2007 (talk) 23:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Low quality article

message: what are the auxillary verbs  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.90.227.201 (talk) 10:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  what are the auxillary verbs 

message: What is the average age of matric pass  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.178.206.97 (talk) 05:40, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Study
Talk:Adam's Bridge

message: According to archeological survey of India,the ram satu i.e Adam's bridge is a man-made bridge built about 7000 years ago while ramayan i.e also 7000 years old.This proves the ram setu build or formed during ramanaya epic.
I REQUEST WIKIPEDIA TO MAKE THIS CHANGE,THIS A SENSITIVE TOPIC.  Avi4rag (talk) 04:33, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Unsourced, and more than a bit dubious that this is man-made. Meters (talk) 05:32, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 January 2024
Talk:P. J. Kennedy

message: *The article does not need so many photos of Kennedy that are all around the same time - the images are redundant and add no new information to the article. The one image is truly redundant, it is almost an exact duplicate of the inbox image, one image taken in 1903, the other in 1900.
*The article does not need such a HUGE picture of Kennedy's grave marker (as seen in this edit.  The image overwhelms the text.  Wikipedia is not a photo album - it is an encyclopedia.
Shearonink (talk) 19:09, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the recently added images for the reasons you gave plus they weren't properly licensed. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recently added images 

message: In 1914, P.J. Kennedy's son Joseph married philanthropist Rose Fitzgerald
:Are you sure it is correct to classify Rose Fitzgerald in her early 20's as a philanthropist? Valetude (talk) 17:27, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rose Kennedy
Talk:Canidae

message: The Falkland Island wolf is called the Falkland Island fox on the fox page. Which is it? Do me need a redirect? (after someone writes an article, of course!) Rmhermen 15:45, Nov 8, 2003 (UTC)
:Both names are in use, but in its appearance this animal is rather a fox than a wolf. I will change it on this page from "wolf" to "fox". If anybody should ever write an article about this animal, a redirect would be a good idea. -- Baldhur 20:52, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Signed for date/time archiving purposes only. William Harris • (talk) • 09:19, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: COMMENTS

message: Chilla is a sister taxon to culpeo: L. Tchaicka et al. "Molecular assessment of the phylogeny and biogeography of a recently diversified endemic group of South American canids (Mammalia: Carnivora: Canidae). Genetics and Molecular Biology, 39 (3): 442-451Falkland Island wolf needs to be included as sister taxon of maned wolf: Slater, G. J.; Thalmann, O.; Leonard, J. A.; Schweizer, R. M.; Koepfli, K.-P.; Pollinger, J. P.; Rawlence, N. J.; Austin, J. J.; Cooper, A.; Wayne, R. K. (2009-11-03). "Evolutionary history of the Falklands wolf" (PDF). Current Biology. 19 (20): R937–R938. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.018. ISSN 0960-9822. PMID 19889366. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 4, 2013.Mariomassone (talk) 13:23, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The cladogram already has updates for Canis and Vulpes so an update for Lycalopex is appropriate.  The result for the Falkland wolf looks fairly definitive. Do you want to make the changes or do you want me to do them?   Jts1882 | talk  16:12, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you? I've tried but I still need to work these cladograms out without making messes of them. Mariomassone (talk) 19:35, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  . I've also put the Lycalopex section in the Lycalopex article if you plan on adding more images.   Jts1882 | talk  07:16, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cerdocyonina branch needs updating 

message: I have no expertise in this subject but cannot understand why only 10 of the 13 extant canid genera are pictured. It seems to me that the average Wiki user would wonder that as well. And, it is the more aggravating because neither here nor in the ‘List of Canids’ are the three missing ones identified. Irish Melkite (talk) 17:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The mosaic images in taxoboxes usually just show a representative sample of the taxon's members. There are often too many to show them all. Here you have the additional problem of fitting 13 into a rectangle. For what it's worth the missing genera are Atelocynus, Lupulella and Lycalopex (from listing at List of canids).—  Jts1882 | talk  12:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why 10 and not 13?
Talk:Richard Carrión

message: The current president of Banco Popular is David H. Chafey, Jr. (at least in Puerto Rico, per BPPR Puerto Rico Spanish-language web page); he has been president since 2004. The article itself refers to Carrion's presidency in the past tense ("when he was president"). Richard Carrion continues to be the CEO. This is also consistent with what appears on the Popular, Inc. page. Please correct or verify if you find different information.--Lawrlafo (talk) 22:09, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No longer President
Talk:Hook and Cod wars

message: How long did the battles last after they restarted in 1417? And what were the Hooks named for? Rmhermen 17:56, Nov 8, 2003 (UTC)
:Hooks are what you use for catching cod. The battles lasted until 1428 (the zoen van Delft, literally "kiss of Delft", but it probably means "reconciliation"). After that there was a short period of fighting around 1432/33. There were smaller battles outside of the periods that are mentioned now, for example when Maximillian of Austria (Cod) became count of Holland late in the 15th century.
:I will be adding more information to the page later, but it's hard to be complete, as it is a very confusing series of apparently unconnected battles. Eugene van der Pijll 19:21, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm removing the additional citations tag.  There are 32 listed in the references and most sections have a reference. It may be appropriate for certain sections or assertions but those sections and assertions should be marked seperately. JASpencer (talk) 06:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional citations
Talk:Robert Bolt

message: where is Sayles, Manchester? Do you mean Sale, Manchester? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.255.36.18 (talk) 18:23, 8 November 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Sayles?

message: "He died in Petersfield, Hampshire, England following a long illness aged 70."
How do you know how old his long illness was?................OH! you mean he died aged 70 following a long illness!! Have altered the article to reflect what I assume you mean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.177.152.156 (talk) 18:32, 21 June 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Long illness

message: Does anybody know what source he used for The Mission? I'm just wondering is there a book that is the basis of that film? Thanks. 193.1.172.163 15:55, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspiration for The Mission

message: There seems a lot of disagreement between sources as to when Bolt died.  12 February, 20 February and 21 February all appear in Google searches.   We’re currently saying 12 February.
The NTY obit says he died "Monday".  This obit was published 23 Feb 1995, a Wednesday, which makes the date of “Monday” 21 February 1995.  ImdB and Britannica both say 20 February, but they’re both known for sometimes getting it wrong.  It’s far more likely that it was either the 20th or the 21st than the 12th.  I’m going to trust the NYT on this one, and change the article to 21 February 1995.  Perhaps the editor meant to type "21" but transposed the numbers.  --  JackofOz (talk) 07:55, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: In the early 1980s, he had a short-lived third marriage, to Ann Zane, former Marquess of Queensbury, before remarrying Sarah Miles in 1988, with whom he remained until his death in 1995.
: Two points.  
:* It's Queensberry, not Queensbury.  
:* (a) How could a woman ever have been the Marquess of anything, and (b) how does anyone become a "former Marquess"?  Was she perhaps the ex-wife of the Marquess, and thus "the former Marchioness"?  --  JackofOz (talk) 08:11, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Ann Zane
Talk:DMOZ/Archive 2

message: The external links for this article were excessive; unlike the ODP, Wikipedia is not a web directory. ;-) Some could go back, particularly a couple for examples of ODP data usage on other sites. I've added comments to each subsection:
ODP links: Normally, articles simply link to the front page of the site in question. An interested reader can presumably find his way around from there.
*  About the ODP
* Open Directory RDF Dump
* Community-built Web Directories
*Sites Using ODP Data
Alternatives to ODP: "Alternatives" may imply that people want to move away from the ODP to another web directory. Long ago, I removed a similiar section from Microsoft Word, and replaced it with a link to List of word processors (which has since been moved to word processor. I've done the same here. Besides, the links to projects listed here seem to have different goals than creating an all-encompassing web directory.
* FreeMoz
* XODP @ SourceForge.Net
* WikLink
Customized examples using ODP data: A couple of these could go back in as examples. A better plan may to be to create List of sites using ODP data.
*Customized examples with extra features: Alexa, Teradex, Asinah
*Customized examples due to the language: de,  fr, es, jp, it, nl, pl, cz
*Google directory: en, de, fr, jp, kr, es
*slider directory: www, de, fr, jp, kr, it, cn, b5, dk, nl, pt, fi, se, cz
-- Stephen Gilbert 06:30, 25 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Scientific method/Archive 5

message: I've removed the material on Kuhn. My apologies if this causes offence. My aim is simply to construct a better article, not to gag the author. Perhaps the author (168?) would like to move the material to the article on Kuhn himself? 
I strongly recommend that the article not contain any material about particular philosophers, historians or sociologists, and instead contain a more extensive set of links to other articles.  Why?:
* This will prevent many of the claims to bias 
* It would be far better to keep discussion of the pros and cons of individual methodologies to the articles on those methodologies
* The links will provide a outline of the debate itself
Banno 20:18, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's silly to remove mention of Kuhn, but I brought some of his observations back in without bing back his name. I also removed the article's paragraph on Karl Popper, who would have been the only philospher of science in the article otherwise.168... 00:55, 9 Nov 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Kuhn
Talk:Operation Mindfuck

message: Clearly falsifiable, I'd say... Voting on this stuff takes more time and energy than posting it User:Wetman
I'm going to fix this entry up tomorrow. I'm too lazy to do it tonight. I've got a lot of experience with the Discordian sub-culture, though.
not false
----
I could use some help formatting this stuff properly for the article. OMGASM is a branch of Operation Mindfuck which has been very active in the past year - all Golden Apple Seed Missions qualify as part of Operation Mindfuck.
ColbertGASM - collaborative prank to get Stephen Colbert to say "23 Skidoo" on TV as a signal to participants of OM
EggGASM - annual prank involving hiding plastic easter eggs with absurd things inside them.
Cramulus (talk) 15:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Operation Mindfuck was referenced by comedian Frankie Boyle in a recent episode of Mock the Week: "You've each been selected for this mission because you're unknown to the enemy and you each have a special skill. Professor Hawking, John Leslie, Phil Neville, the Wu-Tang Clan, Usher, the Sugar Puffs Monster and Daniel Day Lewis! WELCOME...TO OPERATION MINDFUCK!"
***Not sure if this has any value, but I wanted to copy it from the history before I lose track of it.YhnMzw (talk) 15:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scrap Sources

message: This is absolutely uninformative.Kiwi Rex (talk) 03:05, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You're reading it wrong. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You mean it's intentionally meaningless? If that's the case, it should be mentioned in the page. Kiwi Rex (talk) 20:43, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaningless page
Talk:Parts of Holland

message: Hi, I know this discussion was a good while ago now, but just to say: no, Holland, Kesteven and Lindsey were the 3 Parts of Lincolnshire: it was Lindsey which was itself divided into 3 ridings - north, west and south. TheVenerableBede 12:27, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridings of Lincolnshire 

message: So, was this named after the region of the Netherlands? 90.240.205.52 (talk) 09:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At the university in Leiden, i learned that many colonists from the Dutch county of Holland moved to England, and they named the area to their own area on the other side of the North Sea. Don't know of any sources for it.Daanschr (talk) 12:33, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Holland is almost entirely composed of land reclaimed from The Fens (again much like The Netherlands). Before draining (by Dutchmen) in the 17th C it would have been a series of (very low) hills poking out of the water/marsh. However I find it hard to believe it's entirely coincidence that the two areas bear the same name for different reasons. Going further back, pre reclamation in both areas, Frisians from Holland migrated to Eastern England. I suspect there are many overlapping reasons for the two regions sharing the name. 92.27.123.95 (talk) 10:02, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Then the statement There is a resemblance in landscape between the Parts of Holland and Holland, the region in the Netherlands, although their meanings are different is potentially misleading. Valetude (talk) 05:37, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: text says labor ipse merces bu shield has labore (ablatif, by work) ipse merces... Which one it is ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.143.210.7 (talk) 18:24, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  moto
Talk:Kansai International Airport

message: The article doesn't explain the "sinking problem" at all, it just assumes the reader already knows about it or can guess. Also, I think the "History" section should go before the "Outlook" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.102.220.129 (talk) 08:37, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sinking problem
Talk:Vierbein

message: Forgive me if I'm wrong here. The principal bundle (I've called it B): this is supposed given first and V constructed from it ... ? Well, I guess B and V exist in a state of mutual implication here. And the invertible vector bundle map from TM to V? That's just an isomorphism of vector bundles?
So this is all a way of saying that TM can be reduced to structure group SO(p,q), and B is the associated principal bundle? Well, if so I can read on further ...
Charles Matthews 21:13, 8 Nov 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never read that book. So I can't really say. It's up to you, I guess. Phys 15:53, 11 Nov 2003 (UTC)

text: That would be fine. We probably need an article about frames in the component notation as well, because some people, especially physicists prefer the component notation. Phys 16:01, 11 Nov 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Viscount Stansgate

message: I love the way someone's put in a link to explain the Second World War, but didn't think it necessary to explain in remainder to the baronetcy of blah blah blah. What the ^&%!@ @$£ does it mean? C0pernicus (talk) 23:03, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Remainder

message: Is it possible that the future 3rd Viscount will disclaim the peerage, like his father ?
Thanks to Lords reform he dont`t need it for a future in politics, but maybe he wish to do it on ideological reasons ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.242.236.114 (talk) 05:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Many things are possible but they would be speculation.Garlicplanting (talk) 11:04, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A second disclaim ? 

message: "As a descendant of the first Benn Baronet of The Old Knoll"
What does this mean, as he's not heir apparent nor the heir apparent's heir, according to the other wiki page.
Ganpati23 (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does in remainder mean?
Talk:February 11

message: Date of birth for singer Khalid (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_(singer) ) in 1998. Source: https://twitter.com/thegreatkhalid/status/1094869513294630920 FreeChurros (talk) 18:21, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: That is a remarkably weak source. He just says he's 21.  He doesn't say it's his birthday.  Toddst1 (talk) 18:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Twitter posts are generally not considered a reliable source. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2020 

message: Right: this page lists Mary Quant’s year of birth as 1934.
As does the Britannica page.
However, the Britannica entry has a question mark by the year: which tells me they’re not sure about the date: either the year, or the whole date.
The Wikipedia entry on Mary tells us her birth year was 1930: and cites two external references.
Can we get the date checked and tidied up, please?
Cuddy2977 (talk) 10:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mary Quant’s birthday 

message: It’s the birthday of the famous Roséanne Park, known as Rosé on the stage the 4th official member of BLACKPINK and a beautiful young woman well know in K-pop industry and around the world 209.169.148.166 (talk) 06:55, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  11th February 

message: Mary Quant's year of birth was 1930, not 1934 2.99.58.8 (talk) 20:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: As mentioned in the footnote that I added (which was copied over from the Mary Quant article and I presume has WP:EDITCON), it seems that most newer sources accept her year of birth as 1930. Liu1126 (talk) 21:29, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 February 2024 

message: The Super Bowl with the 49rs and the chiefs on February 11th, 2024 2604:2D80:4388:2100:1DE5:F5DE:6E5C:5A0 (talk) 04:11, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superbowl
Talk:American Sign Language

message: How come the Regional Variations doesn't seem to have as many citations. The information seems valid, but there's only 1 citation per section with a lot of information included? -Jdenny17 (talk) 19:06, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Jdenny17 Seconded, but I'd like to add that the claim that "research often shows" that faster signing is due to faster paced lifestyle in urban areas is based on a mention of an interview with a single Deaf person and smells like completely invalid informations to me. I think it'd be an extremely significant result if it was proven. Trerri (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Regional Variations 

message: The map in the infobox is difficult to interpret especially before enlarging as the colors are pretty similar. I'm not super worried about color being the only distinction here, because the info is provided in the text of the main article under geographic distribution, but I do think that more contrast might be helpful? I don't know anything about infobox editing and it looks like the map is from Commons... hoping someone with more experience in one/both of those areas might have some thoughts. SomeoneDreaming (talk) 02:05, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map legibility