Talk:Kursk

message: The page seem to contain almost no information about modern life of Kursk and even have no links to administrations' websites. My attempt to add a photograph of modern Kursk was reverted with the image being described as 'hardly informative rural creek' (in fact this is an area in the very centre of Kursk ( - place of shooting, camera looking southwestbound) with 'private sector' houses in the foreground and a number of multi-storey urban blocks in the background). Is it a policy - to describe a large central-Russian regional center trough two aged b/w photos of cathedrals and accepting no actual additions? Ss r 09:15, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006 messages 

message: battle of kursk is not really a turning point, stalingrad was because that was the first major german defeat of the whole war, battle of moscow was because thats when the germans' advance was haulted for the first time.  i changed the article to reflect this.
--Greg.loutsenko 23:32, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm glad you can't change that, then, because you'd be wrong and there'd be absolutely no citation for that. The whole 1973 Arab-Israeli War didn't have as many tanks as the Battle of Kursk. -- JoannaSerah (talk) 19:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  battle of kursk 

message: Difficult to find references for things, as I only speak a few words of Russian.
Regarding ROSI and KCO, the best I can offer is that I was just there.
EEBaum 18:05, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ROSI/Kursk Chamber Orchestra 

message: Not sure about this but is the architecture in the photo actually Stalinist, or just plain neoclassical?
HowardSelsam 08:49, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architecture 

message: The first footnote source does not seem to have anything to do with this particular section of the article, as it directs to an arguably irrelevant website.  XRedcomet (talk) 10:33, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source Under Attractions Section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kursk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.glava-kurska.ru/news/2011/9/14/1601/
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5lctsW5KG?url=http://www.twins2010.com/fileadmin/user_upload/pic/Dokumente/List_of_Twin_Towns_01.pdf?PHPSESSID=2edd34819db21e450d3bb625549ce4fd to http://www.twins2010.com/fileadmin/user_upload/pic/Dokumente/List_of_Twin_Towns_01.pdf?PHPSESSID=2edd34819db21e450d3bb625549ce4fd
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Kursk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080131110624/http://rco.k46.ru/index.htm to http://rco.k46.ru/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:50, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I don't have an exact date, but wasn't the German occupation ending during Operation Star?  The current article text seems inconsistent with both that are the following sentence about the Battle of Kursk. 109.255.211.6 (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved now.  109.255.211.6 (talk) 00:06, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  German occupation