Talk:Big Brother (Australian TV series) season 4

message: I'm trying to bring this to the talk page as the edit warring and posting replies to messages in edit summaries really doesn't help.  Why should it not be there?  —JD[don't talk|email] 15:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no need to remove the link; having it there harms nobody.  The positioning of the note in comparison to the rest of the article doesn't mean clicking the star makes the page not move at all.  People that use popups can read the note by hovering over it.  Having a star next to the note doesn't make it that easy to understand.  —JD[don't talk|email] 15:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to sound rude, but I didn't understand much of that at all. "...doesn't mean clicking the star makes the page not move at all..."?godgoddingham333 15:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you click the star, the page will still move down to where the note is; sometimes that's what people need to realise that what's there is what they're meant to be reading.  —JD[don't talk|email] 15:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, but because the star is so close to the end, the page only moves down a centimetre or two. Also, when you mentioned popups, 90% of people who use Wikipedia (i.e. non-editors or people without accounts) don't use popups. godgoddingham333 15:41, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't about the percentage that don't.  This isn't about the percentage that do, either.  It's about the fact that it doens't need to be removed, and having it there makes more sense than removing it for no reason - if the page doesn't move when it's clicked, good for it, I say.  Not everybody uses massive television-sized computer monitors.  —JD[don't talk|email] 15:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nor do I, I'm participating on a Apple Powerbook G4 (a laptop with one of the smallest displays - 12"). If you're adamant on it being a star next to Wesley's name, then make the note have a star rather than "Note 1:" It makes it sound like there's more than one note and anyway, it could have come from anywhere on the page... godgoddingham333 15:50, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was planning on putting more notes on for the other twist.  —JD[don't talk|email] 15:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The star link thing 

message: Rachel (2001), Nicole (2002), Jaime (2003), Violeta (2004) were all evicted through existing housemates voting for which intruder they wanted to stay. Each year, these specials were advertised as "Housemate's Revenge". Only Jaime from 2003 is quoted as being evicted in this way. Due to no public involvement, this is significant and thus I have added these to the respective years' HM tables. 
121.45.231.227 11:45, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intruders 

message: :Image:Merlin gretel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Merlin gretel.jpg

message: the ashlaea and monica week is messed up. they were evicted but not against the public vote?? godgoddingham 333 15:42, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  noms table 

message: :Image:BB04-DS.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:BB04-DS.JPG

message: :Image:Trevorbutlerbreeamer.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Trevorbutlerbreeamer.jpg

message: I have upgraded this article to C-Class as it meets the criteria, the article has a good amount of information but not enough yet for B-Class. More reliable sources would be good to improve the article. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 22:22, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upgraded to C-Class 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Celebrity Big Brother 1 (U.S.) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 05:18, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Big Brother 1 (Australia) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 07:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Big Brother (Australia season 1) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 21:15, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion in progress