lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ghizela Vass

message: There  is very doubtful  her categorization  among "Romanian Jews". She had a Hungarian  husband and a
Jewish  son - in -law.
:A reliable source mentions she was Jewish. Biruitorul (talk) 02:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can bring out several other sources to back that statement (which, in itself, should not be controversial - conspiracy theory aside). This brings forth another issue I notice for now: in his 2005 book, Adrian Cioroianu indicates that Vass was the Romanian equivalent of a Holocaust survivor, having spent the war years in Transnistria, and that she subsequently represented a faction of Antonescu's former prisoners inside the Communist Party (page 52). Another minor issue I note for now is that we should indicate somewhere that Vass was also known as "Gizela Vas", "Gizela Vass" and "Ghizela Vas", although one cannot be sure if they are all proper variants or mistakes. I'm willing to add these details and more in the near future, if you guys have no objection. Dahn (talk) 03:32, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: By all means. Also, once we've established what variants existed, I suppose appropriate redirects should be created too. Biruitorul (talk) 04:26, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Btw, you've got to read this! Dahn (talk) 05:03, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Was not  a Romanian  Jewess, was of Christian  origin
Talk:The Baby Maker

message: I've edited the "Samuel Francis" link in the credits to point to the page of the painter Sam Francis. It had been linked as "Samuel Francis (actor)" - a non-existent Wikipedia page. But in fact, it is the painter Sam Francis in the film. See http://www.swtb.info/ for documentation of the link between Sam Francis and Single Wing Turquoise Bird (the light show ensemble who appear in the film.)
Mediamation (talk) 06:55, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast 

message: "For other uses, see Paper Chase." - I don't understand that? --Dan LeveilleTALK 01:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: While creating page, I used The Paper Chase as a template, please alert if there is any information referring to The Paper Chase where there shouldn't be! Kendra (talk) 02:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  otheruses
Talk:Resources about Martin Luther

message: I added a workldcat link. The fact that this page exists probably means that that there is a concern about gross over-linking for Martin Luther, so I suspect that some editors may be sensititive to external linking. Please look at this link carefully before you delete it. Worldcat is simply a massive online database of a great many card catalogs for physical libraries. It is not commercial,and it does not push any partifular POV that I can descern. The Worldcat link is the fastest way for most viewwers to find a physical book in a nearby library, and might thereby induce our reaerest oactually go find these physical books. 
If you think this link is not appropriate, I would appreciate a discusion before you delete it, but I won't take offense. Thanks -Arch dude (talk) 01:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WorldCat link

message: It has been said that there are more publishe books on Martin Luther than any other individual save Jesus Christ. I think this fact  should be put in here somewhere.Vorbee (talk) 21:33, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Great number of books
Talk:Football at the 1936 Summer Olympics

message: was this the first instance whena golden goal rule was used?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.200.115.170 (talk) 16:04, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: first use of golden goal?
Talk:Romulan language

message: This article has so little information that it should be merged into Romulan. Additionally, there is no sourcing for any of the statements. I'm going to open an RfC for this to merge. StarHOG (Talk) 13:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  StarHOG (Talk) 13:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Romulan
Talk:Sir John Murray, 8th Baronet

message: I do not know enough about the subject of this article to correct this issue.  It appears that this part of the section is contradictory:
"With his small army, Murray defeated Marshal Louis Suchet at the Battle of Castalla on April 13, 1813. Though Suchet was outnumbered two-to-one and the battle was largely won by the British infantry,"
How can Murray's "small army" manage to outnumber Suchet's?
Antelope In Search Of Truth (talk)
Murray commanded 18,000 men while Suchet had about 8,000. Technically, Suchet commanded a corps of two small divisions. Suchet very aggressively attacked Murray and was driven off with heavy losses. (I plan to write a Castalla article soon.) There are a few things in this article I'm not happy with. I'll try to make it more clear. Djmaschek (talk) 04:06, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory Label
File talk:Mutant Chronicles.jpg

message: Sorry, can you please explain the fair use problem here and provide a link to something that is done right? Hobit (talk) 02:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The template offers a number of links that answer your question. --Jack Merridew 09:27, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I Have tried to fix it. Hopefully correctly. :) Jeltz talk 21:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Knights of Columbus Vatican Film Library

message: I would expect this page to be about the library of films held by the Vatican, established in 1959 per
http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/pccs/documents/rc_pc_pccs_doc_16111959_statute-film-library_en.html
Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 02:14, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point.  I've added a disambiguation note to the top of the VFL page, and a couple lines about the different Film Libraries to the Vatican Library page.  If you can find other sources which talk about the in-Vatican version, you can add the information there, or bring more sources here and we can discuss where they would best fit.  Do you think there's enough information to make a standalone article on the Vatican version? --Elonka 22:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:It's a Wonderful Lie (House)

message: Aren't all the writers on strike?  Will this episode air on time? Llamabr (talk) 02:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Writers

message: Strangely, this article is redirecting to the list of episodes.  I guess someone redirected it, because the article doesn't yet have much substance?  Nonetheless, it had some substance (e.g., it used to tell me the air date). Llamabr (talk) 15:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?

message: The present discription is lifted from:
http://tv.ign.com/objects/907/907453.html
So I've deleted it, per wikipedia policy. Llamabr (talk) 18:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: When I saw this episode air, I thought it was kind of strange to have a christmas themed episode after the holiday season.  Does anybody know why this is so?  Is it because they had a christmas script ready to go, did the strike delay the episode, or what? QBasicer (talk) 02:02, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Theme

message: Is there really any reason to believe she'll be a future love interest?  House's behavior towards her didn't seem any different than to a number of other clinic patients over the prior seasons. 71.32.80.134 (talk) 04:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted the implication that there was. - Shaheenjim (talk) 06:55, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Also regarding how you call her the prostitute here, she is actually a prostitute, correct? The way she spoke seemed like she was, and their logical process of elimination regarding what Saint Nicholas represents, if she was following said logic, does make her one. I don't believe her acting in a nativity scene means she isn't a prostitute at all; she in fact specified that there was no reason to tell her mother, because it would only lead to her having to prove her righteousness. So she is actually a prostitute, eh? Currently, the final paragraph seems to imply that she turns out not to be.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.177.120.179 (talk) 05:08, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed that, I believe it is possible she is we have no fact that she isn't. Million_Moments (talk) 08:52, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: She was a prostitute. She had AIDS tests every three months, and her response to House's question "Does your mother know what you do for a living?" is very telling. Prostitutes go to church too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.193.49.104 (talk) 04:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not the good ones 219.89.144.83 (talk) 07:49, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Prostitute

message: It's not in this page but it's List of House episodes. I've changed it. Just want to tell.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.8.87.117 (talk) 15:04, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Not Metastatic

message: To words the end of the episode right after they find out she is going to die, Is the song barely playing loud enough hear, Sun King by the Beatles? Possibly worth mentioning since the beatles don't do that sort of thing often?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sir Joe Cool (talk • contribs) 01:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sun King
Talk:Save the Last Dance 2

message: Cut from intro of Save the Last Dance:
:, the first MTV Film to have a PG-13 rating since Beavis and Butthead Do America (1996)
Is the above really true? And does it mean "first to have a rating as low as PG-13", implying that MTV films are usually rated R or what? --Uncle Ed (talk) 21:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating
Talk:Forbidden City (novel)

message: Changed it to same basic information about the novel. Formally it was vandalised.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Comrado (talk • contribs) 21:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comrado 

message: This article needs references to reliable sources that discuss the book.  Expanding the plot summary will not establish notability.  Groomtech (talk) 16:31, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Category talk:Eurybia (plant)

message: Is there a consensus that each plant genus, in addition to linking to a genus should also have a genus-category page? That means there are two redundant ways of finding it. Of course, the category will be listed to species lists, whereas the genus link will also list other uses. However, is there a way around this, make it more automatic? Perhaps can this be integrated into the taxaboxes, and also taxoboxes using this to automatically display all species in a genus, rather than manually listing? Vigilius (talk) 07:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Karipur

message: Based on Google search result counts, Karipur is the more common spelling than Karippur.
karipur Kerala  119,000
karippur Kerala  25,900
karipur Malappuram  44,200
karippur Malappuram 16,300
karipur site:gov.in  1960
karippur site:gov.in  650
karipur Kerala site:gov.in  1050
karippur Kerala site:gov.in  503
karipur Malappuram site:gov.in  345
karippur Malappuram site:gov.in 309
karipur site:kerala.gov.in  438
karippur site:kerala.gov.in 375
karipur Malappuram site:kerala.gov.in  226
karippur Malappuram site:kerala.gov.in 195
Nurg (talk) 08:55, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of name 
Talk:United States v. Keenan

message: A google search for "united states + keenan + luczko" returns a mere 94 results, most of which offer no more detail than the Wikipedia article. The majority seem to be direct copies of this page at about.com. When did the case take place? What was Keenan's first name? Is the whole thing a fabrication? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 15:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I found more details in a published book, so I updated the article. I suspect that the new reference is a more reliable source than the online article that was previously the source of the paragraph here, but I left in the reference to the online article too. (The entire text of this Wikipedia article used to be a verbatim quote from that online article, so I also tried to use less quoting.) --Elysdir (talk) 05:40, 7 April 2020 (UTC)

text: Added a  tag, although if the about.com article was only a copy of this wiki entry, then this would be . I could not find references to this case on Google Scholar: .  --2601:543:0:1346:D54D:4AE0:7BFC:EED (talk) 09:53, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Details
Talk:Rodger Davies

message: There are many sources on "the killing of US ambassador Rodger P. Davies". Although newspapers of the epoch are not widely in internet, a simple Google search with the words within commas yields us to several news reports. (For example: Boca raton News(paper) on 19 August 1974) We should use those sources for reference in this article. I have never opened a "references" section by myself until today but I will try it after work. If any experienced user, especially those interested in Cyprus affairs does it before me, will be appreciated. --E4024 (talk) 11:44, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources: Request of Help 

message: The following needs to be corrected:
"It is alleged he was killed by Greek Cypriot gunmen during an anti-American demonstration outside the U.S. Embassy in Nicosia,[2] where an estimated 300–600 Greek Cypriots were "demonstrating against the U.S.’s failure" to stop the Turkish invasion of Cyprus,[3] which they perceived as the United States siding with Turkey.[4]"
First, source #2 does not explicitly state that Davies was killed by the mob but rather "during" the storming of the Embassy by protesters. However, source #4 clearly states that Davies was not killed by any of the protestersbut most likely from a sniper who was shooting from a nearby building through Davies' open windows. Therefore it is impossible to ascertain beyond any reasonable doubt the identity or the assassin let alone his national allegiance. It is wrong therefore to blame the Greek-Cypriot protesters for that heinous crime.
Second, nowhere in sources #3 and especially #4 can be found that "they [Greek-Cypriots] perceived as the United States siding with Turkey" as it stated in the main article. Therefore, the exact quote from these sources should replace the offending statement above which is the product of bias/interpretation by whomever the writer is.
Please correct the above two points in the main article so that it is consistent with its corresponding sources. Thank you!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xwpis ONOMA (talk • contribs) 19:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article inconsistent with corresponding sources.
Talk:Emmet Flood

message: Craziest “s**t” I ever heard, says GOP staffer. Wikipietime (talk) 21:45, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attendance May 24 2018 

message: https://www.politico.com/story/2018/08/29/trump-says-white-house-counsel-don-mcgahn-to-exit-in-the-fall-801587 
(after Trump has announced Don McGahn will leave as White House Counsel) : 
:Though the White House has not yet named McGahn’s replacement, three people close to the president said White House lawyer Emmet Flood is expected to get the job, though a final decision has not yet been made. 
Other media report similarly. --Neun-x (talk) 22:23, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  politico.com  08/29/2018
Talk:Julian Doyle (politician)

message: The article might stand a little polishing, but the subject was a member of the state parliament of Victoria, if I understand correctly.  Surely that meets the notability requirement? --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 02:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Why speedy?
Talk:American mutilation of Japanese war dead

message: The intro explains war souvenirs and war trophies well, but I feel like it isn't introducing the full topic. It seems like intimidating the enemy and dehumanizing the enemy are covered in in the subheadings, but are not referenced in the intro.
I'm on the fence if the paragraph starting "The phenomenon of "trophy-taking"" fits better as the first paragraph of the Trophy-Taking header. Thoughts? 2001:569:52F9:4300:94F2:E30F:5982:BE65 (talk) 08:38, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Talk:Dorothy Hunt

message: This page and other Wikipedia pages quote Charles Colson as saying this, citing a July 8, 1974 Time magazine article as the source. But the quote is not there. Carl Oglesby in "The Yankee and the Cowbar War" also contains this quote, but he also cites the Time article and the quote is not there. This quote is therefore very dubious and unsourced.
________
The quote is on page 2 of the online version of the article, here:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,943904-2,00.html
"The CIA was involved in all aspects of Watergate, said Colson as he ticked them off. The agency helped carry out the burglary of the office of Daniel Ellsberg's psychiatrist, destroyed evidence, put out a cover story to camouflage its part in the Watergate break-in and tried to divert the FBI from investigating it. He confessed to Bast: "I don't say this to my people. They'd think I'm nuts. I think they killed Dorothy Hunt." He was referring to the death of E. Howard Hunt's wife in an air crash in 1972. Colson thought that the agency was trying to silence her. Almost gratuitously, Colson told Bast that he believed Howard Hughes had given $100,000 and even more to the President and his family for their private use. "Hughes can blow the whistle on him."" Sofa King (talk) 07:14, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "I think the CIA killed Dorothy Hunt"

message: Could someone provide a citation that Dorothy Hunt ever actually worked for the CIA? On Thermonuclear War (talk) 21:32, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: CIA Employment

message: There is currently a discussion concerning this article at the Fringe Theories Noticeboard. Interested editors are invited to join the discussion which may be found here. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:18, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has been redirected per consensus at the above discussion. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:28, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  FTN Discussion
Talk:John Hamre

message: I am told by one of his associates that he serverd as DEPSECDEF at least into the beginning of 2000.  He was there for the big Y2K bug scare.  If he got out right after that though, that could be why 2000 wasn't counted.  All the sources I find so far though are saying 1999, so I am going to leave it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emry (talk • contribs) 22:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 
Talk:Curtiss-Wright CW-12

message: The article says in "Variants" that 10 CW-16E were built, and in "Operators" that 15 were sold to the Argentine Navy. This number is confirmed by another source (see details in MUAN website, Curtiss Wright Kelito page). So these figures are inconsistent. Can anyone please provide source for the figure in "Variants" (i.e.: 10)? Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 15:12, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Aerofiles http://www.aerofiles.com/_curthyphen.html says that ten CW-16Es were built and a prototype of which six were exported to Colombia. Perhaps more than one "variant" used the "E" as the Argentine aircraft appeared  a few years after the ones listed in aerofiles MilborneOne (talk) 18:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency in CW-16E
Talk:George Kisevalter

message: English-speaking Nosenko was interviewed five times altogether in 1962. Per his book, "Spy Wars," Russian-understanding Bagley interviewed him the first time, and then Kisevalter flew in two days later and he and Bagley interviewed Nosenko the four remaining times. Was Kisevalter Nash? (talk) 09:01, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kisevalter helped Bagley interview Nosenko four times in 1962. 

message: Nosenko "walked-in" to the CIA in Geneva in late May, 1962. According to Bagley's book "Spy Wars," although Golitsyn and Nosenko had worked in completely different sections of the highly compartmentalized KGB, what Nosenko told Bagley and Kisevalter in 1962 strangely overlapped (and contradicted / deflected from) what Golitsyn had told his interviewers six months earlier. This caused Bagley and CIA Counterintelligence chief James Angleton to conclude that Nosenko was a false defector, sent to the CIA to discredit Golitsyn. When, in January 1964, Nosenko reappeared to the CIA in Geneva and said that he wanted to physically defect to the U.S., the CIA had to grant his wish because he claimed to have been the handler of President Kennedy's assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, in the USSR. The fact that Nosenko was uncooperative during his early 1964 interviews in the U.S. (and eventually became unruly, e.g., punching out a bartender in Baltimore) led Soviet Russia Division chief David Murphy (who was convinced Nosenko was a false defector) and Bagley to have Nosenko incarcerated in April so he couldn't redefect to the USSR (and possibly claim that he'd been kidnapped by the CIA), and so they could attempt to "break" him through harsh (but not tortuous) interrogations. Was Kisevalter Nash? (talk) 10:51, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  It wasn't Golitsyn's claiming Nosenko was fake that led to Nosenko's incarceration.
Talk:Mark Pfeifle

message: For GOP, Urgency On Social Security  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Munchdead (talk • contribs) 11:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:Lesa Roe

message: * Additional background information is needed. Jccort (talk) 22:14, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Certainly her Maiden Name would be nice...  It's hard to keep track of accomplished women when they marry and change their last names.  --Patbahn (talk) 17:59, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Improve the Article
Talk:Gregory B. Starr

message: hello my name is sylvia lee and what i about to say is very inportan  i have a lot of email from someone how clams be MR GREGORY B STAR A FRIEND NAME SERGEANT SPENCER HULBURT IN AFGHANISTAN WAS SENDING 2.5 MILLION USD TO ME BY A MAN SAYING HE WAS  
GREGORY B STARR ON MONDAY SO I RECEIVED A BLOCK CALL FROM HIM SAYING HE GOT STOP BY CUSTOM AND MY 
PACKAGE WAS IN CUSTOM AND IF I WANT IT I HAVE TO PAY 34000 USD AND THEY WHERE HOLDING GREGORY B STAR UNTIL THE 34000 USD IS PAID
MY EMAIL IS LEE.SYLVIA11@yahoo.com please contact me ASAP  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.100.28.68 (talk) 01:14, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  someone in kotoka interanatonal airport say they are mr gregory b starr at custom  running scam  
Talk:Peter B. Neubauer

message: SOmeone should expand on Neubauer's unethical experiment involving triplets deliberately separated at birth. As one of the subjects said: "this is, like, Nazi shit." —184.148.106.219 (talk) 17:33, 22 August 2018‎ (UTC)
:I added this to the article, trying to maintain WP:Due weight in the context of Neubauer's life & career. —173.56.25.136 (talk) 07:14, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: Under what legal regulations is the study sealed until October 25, 2065? Can that be challenged?
What about the potential litigations against the adoption agency?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.26.227.59 (talk) 05:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Louise Wise Services closed in 2004. All records turned over to Spence-Chapin. David notMD (talk) 19:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More legal context, please
Talk:Dan Remmes

message: If you "google" Mr. Remmes and/or follow the reference links I think you'll find he's an notable personality in the entertainment industry as evidenced by the national publicity and available publications.  He has several prominent projects in addition to his Broadway experience which have not yet been made public (but will be included as they are).  I hope you'll consider him a notable presence and worthy of your site.  I obviously welcome your editorial contributions as well.
--Actingman (talk) 03:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]