lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Scottish Socialist Party United Left

message: well, they have a website, that means they probably exist, i guess--152.163.100.139 20:13, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I just made a website for Hippie Puppy Animal Control - I guess it exists now =D.  The problem isn't about it existing - it's about its notability. --mboverload@ 20:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nothing but Trouble (1991 film)

message: The town is actually supposed to be in Pennsylvania.  I remember thinking, "if they're going from NYC to AC, how would they end up in PA?"  Nonetheless, they clearly enter PA.  At the end after the big explosion, the newscaster says that the blast could be heard in several neighboring states and lists New Jersey among them.  I'm going to change the article. 98.221.133.96 (talk) 11:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Location

message: The version I saw shows Chase completely blowing off the stop sign, not stopping past it like the article suggests. Is there more than one version?
Shippo 03:07, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Version

message: Where do the people who contribute to IMDB get their information, and how do we know this? It does not seem a very transparent site, especially not as our only source of information for an article. 
There are DVD releases for this movie that may be closer to primary sources and therefore better. Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Viewing a DVD for information is Original Research, and is not permitted. The Wiki's goal is verifiable accuracy, meaning that reliable sources should be used, and should be cited for ease of verification. Bustter (talk) 21:33, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

text: Information from IMDB Triva pages should be marked as such. As a source it's highly dubious. ParasiteNetwork (talk) 09:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: IMDb is not a reliable source for much of anything. Trivia from IMDb should be removed. - SummerPhDv2.0 17:09, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing information
Talk:Lease

message: Somehow this topic entirely missed the concept of land leasing. Perhaps that ought to be included somewhere, or at least include a link to another page on land leasing since the format of a land lease is somewhat different. Isaac Tanner Madsen (talk) 01:13, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The difference between a lease and a rental agreement is not clear. -- 195.37.205.30 (talk) 09:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I came looking for Capital vs. Operating Leases.
Many other things besides land are leased.
199.175.128.1 (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Finance lease aka Capital lease, and Operating lease both have articles, referenced in the 'See also' section. William Avery (talk) 16:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This Article is Too Narrowly Focused 

message: lisence or lease is better to rent a shop for one year. khan  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.24.142 (talk) 21:29, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  lisence or lease 

message: Breaking a fixed term tenancy agreement normally occurs when there is an issue, such as sale of the property, repeated breaches of an agreement, or by order by a tribunal.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.69.56.52 (talk) 09:43, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breaking a Lease 

message: * Lease is connected to https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miete which means rent, so it should be connected to https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacht
* Tenant farmer is connected to https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacht but should be connected to https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pächter (which is a redirect to Pacht)
* Renting is connected to https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mietvertrag_(Deutschland) but should be connected to https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miete
truth been told: I think the meaning of Lease and Pacht do not 100% match, but the current state is totally messed up. I gave up changing it, because something is always blocking the change. Please do someone who knows how to edit the connections. -- Thunderbolt (talk) 17:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong connections with German articles
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Jack Hammer (porn actor)

message: (I put this on the talk page of the closing admin. As can be seen below, he didn't accept my arguments, and as he writes, it's not of tremendous importance, but I thought it should at least be associated with the AFD. AnonEMouse (squeak) 20:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I interpreted the nom's opinion slightly differently than you did. I can see the result both ways, and I did consider just putting it as keep, and could easily have done. However, does it really matter? Result was the same in the end- article was kept. Petros471 19:59, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Closing
Talk:Flying Yankee

message: Here is some text that was recently added to the article. It will need to have a published reference to be re-entered in the article:
The use of the term "restoration" for the Flying Yankee is currently under dispute.  Radical changes in the components of the trainset have been made and further changes have been announced.  These include:
Changing from a steam flash boiler heat system to electric baseboard;
Conversion of the 72VDC electrical system to 480V-3/phase;
Complete conversion of the original braking system to a modern 26L adaptation;
Conversions and reconstructions to the physical make-up of the trainset to conform to modern FRA requirements for non-tourist/historical equipment;
Planned installation of a 480V HEP generator in place of the original flash boiler;
Planned elimination of the orignal Winton 201A engine with an as yet undisclosed replacement power plant;
Possible replacement of both main and auxilliary generators for compatibility with a new power plant;
Planned replacement of the original cooling system to that which will be compatible to the new power plant.
In short, the work has become a re-building and no longer qualifies the trainset under the term "historic restoration."
--Ken Gallager (talk) 12:44, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagreement 

message: Any ridership numbers? -- Beland (talk) 22:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ridership
Talk:Bay City (album)

message: I will be finishing this...Anazgnos 20:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Surf's Up! (album)

message: I will be finishing this also. Anazgnos 20:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Program (1993 film)

message: How can this article actually not mention the incident in which goofs imitated a scene from the movie and were injured or killed, which resulted in the mimicked scene being deleted from the movie?!  That was a rather significant news story.  I apologize if I overlooked it and it IS in the article, but if it isn't, please insert it!  Thanks, --164.107.92.120 05:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Fleet Command

message: I edited the realism section to delete a few sentences on the Phalanx CIWS.  The sentences carried incorrect info saying that the Phalanx is actually effective in RL while it is not so in the game.  The game got this one right as the Phalanx is very ineffective and is being phased out by the USN because of its many drawbacks.  It is a system that has never claimed a kill despite seeing combat in 1988 and 1991.  
Ben T. 7-30-08
------  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.223.105.26 (talk) 02:24, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits

message: Wow, there's a lot of contents in this article, and almost all of it needs heavy editing, especially copyediting for encyclopaedic style. Also, there are no references at all, which should be addressed. THere are also quite a few POV statements and passages phrased in informal speaking language. Will need to be rooted out.
I added a cluster of relevant screenshots (including the game's splash screen as a logo) that might need to be moved around a bit though. I also removed the errounous and superfluous RTS discussions --the game is a real-time tactics military simulator-- and copyedited the gameplay discussion a bit (which I also placed under its own header).
I will put in some work on the article later. Mikademus 06:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The state of the article

message: The page says:
The military realism is emphasized further by such means as using some authentic NTDS symbology on the 2D tactical planning map.
The NTDS page doesn't have a a list/a link to one, can anyone tell me where I can find a link to a list of the symbols?
OSbornarfcontributionatoration 21:07, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: NTDS
Talk:Irene, Gauteng

message: Really - it is JUST another suburb....
City dwellers are amazed to find the meadow-like environment and uncomplicated lifestyle in Irene, neighbours still know each other and find time to chat, all in an extremely relaxed and safe environment
Please read Wikipedia:NPOV
--137.215.6.50 20:55, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies, when i wrote my last comment i was a tad bit stressed and wasn't thinking quite straight. Now that I've had a chance to mull over things a bit I do agree with you. Irene is pretty much just another suburb (Granted, a nice to live in suburb with some beautiful gardens). As such, I've removed the ''
City dwellers are amazed to find the meadow-like environment and uncomplicated lifestyle in Irene, neighbours still know each other and find time to chat, all in an extremely relaxed and safe environment line as it does POV the article. I really think we need to do some serious work on this article. Jediwannabe 17:40, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

text: This winter holidays I went to visit family in Irene. It was quite cool, because all the hovels look the same (made out of this type of brick) and it has like a big wall with gates around the whole suburb. It was interesting. --Scotteh 18:21, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The brick is called "Irene Stone" (If thats what you're talking about). You're welcome to come visit us on a friday between 19h00 and 21h30 Jediwannabe 21:18, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't "Hovel" an insult? I know I dont live in a hovel.137.215.9.20 09:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

text: There are still plenty stone walls around. In fact my posie has some of those famed stone walls. When our pool was put in around 20 years ago, large amounts of dynamite were used. Awesome.137.215.9.20 07:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV dispute

message: hallo, if you are interested in photographs of the irene estate, please look at the following link
album photographs irene estate 1890
I'm a collector of early photographs
Annona.de (talk) 19:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irene Estate, photographs 1890
Talk:Cecily of York

message: In the Reign of Richard III section is the statement 
:According to Commines, only two of the elder daughters of Edward IV were declared illegitimate at the time that their younger brothers were excluded from the throne by the Act of Titulus Regius.
which implies in the context of this page that Cecily was not declared illegitimate.
I have looked up the reference and what Commines actually says (Commynes, Phillipe de. The Reign of Louis XI 1461-83. Trans. Michael Jones. Penguin Books 1972: Book 5, chapter 20)
:The two daughters [of Edward IV] were declared illegitimate in a plenary session of Parliament and their right to the royal arms was taken from them.
To my mind this clearly refers to Elizabeth and Cecily. Mary was dead by then (and Margaret too of course), and I can only assume Commines forgot or did not know about Anne, Catherine and Bridget because they were so young.
Should the page be modified, and how? Merely remove the misleading sentence? --Zipperdeedoodah (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titulus Regius
Talk:Marine canvas

message: Wikify tag removed. Wikified as much as can be, given the limited material  KarenAnn 20:53, 21 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I just rewrote part of this page and corrected the typos. The last paragraph is still a mess but I will try and finish it at a later date. Please try and use paragraphs if you add any extra info (and a spell checker). B33R 07:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page cleaned up and typos corrected
Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/Speedy/Criteria

message: On 20 November 2009 an editor transcluded a listing of the the criteria for deletion of categories from a discussion page into the policy page Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion instead of leaving them directly coded in the policy page. That transclusion lasted until 4 December 2013. This had several rather unfortunate consequences, including giving a very misleading impression of what the policy was like during that period to anyone looking at the history: if you look at an old version of the policy you see not what was policy at that time but a copy of what the transcluded page looks like now. It is made even more confusing by the fact that during that period the transcluded page was moved, so that at different stages in the history of the period different transcluded pages appear. Currently one of them is a redirect to a discussion page, and the other is a redirect to the policy page itself. During part of the history of the tranclusion period two different copies of the criteria for categories, from different periods in the history of the policy, both appear in what you will see if you look at an old revision. I wasted a huge amount of time wading through histories trying to figure out what was going on before I worked it all out, and it is virtually certain that there will be editors who simply read what appears in an old version of the history and believe that what they see is what policy was at the time, which is not true.
I am therefore going to remove the misleading redirects from the transcluded pages, and replaced it with a note summarising the situation (more briefly than I am doing here). The loss of the redirect from the pages will do no harm, as for the discussion page I will give links to the pages that the redirects currently target, so anyone reaching the page will be able to follow one of the links, thus reaching the same destination that the redirect would have taken them to. On the other hand anyone looking to see what the policy was like in the past will be informed where they can find that information for the "categories" section, rather than simply being shown the wrong version. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:20, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading and confusing transclusion and subsequent redirect
Talk:Legs Diamond

message: EVERYONE knows that Diamond was killed by Irving "Bitsy" Bitz and Sal Spitale when he wouldn't returtn their investment on a deal gone wrong.. who writes these things? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.215.252.167 (talk • contribs) 05:07, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Diamond's murderers

message: he was a half brother to the actor george brent  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.78.155.230 (talk) 23:09, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Half brother

message: The reference about the novel Billy Bathgate is incorrect. The unnamed gangster that Billy meets with is clearly Lucky Luciano. He is described as Italian with a scar and a droopy eyelid. He is also in a position superior to Dutch Schultz in the underworld heirarchy. The correct reference is that the character Bo, brags to Billy about having killed Legs Diamond on orders from Dutch Shultz.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chsig (talk • contribs) 04:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billy Bathgate reference 

message: This sentence, besides lacking a citation, doesn't actually make sense: "Diamond was also loyal,[citation needed] but was not averse to betraying someone when he saw fit." Even if it's preceded by "for a gangster," it's just illogical. It seems it has to be cut.zadignose (talk) 07:52, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loyal... But Not?
Talk:Anita Dobson

message: A whole season's detailed score-sheet for 'Strictly'? A bit like listing all her school exam results. Valetude (talk) 11:01, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Out of pro?
Talk:18 Monkeys on a Dead Man's Chest

message: this too shall be worked on. Anazgnos 20:57, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I found :Image:18monk.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:48, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:18monk.jpg]]
Talk:Internet Content Adaptation Protocol

message: :— Preceding unsigned comment added by Petertc (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: 108.31.230.102 (talk) 04:56, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is "encapsulations" in "history" section meaning for? 

message: "Don Gillies took over the project in the spring of 2000 and enhanced the protocol to allow pipelined ICAP servers and to support all 3 encapsulations of HTTP allowed by HTTP 1.1."
In RFC 2616, http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2616.html, the term "encapsulation" just appears in 3.7.2 Multipart Types: "MIME provides for a number of "multipart" types -- encapsulations of one or more entities within a single message-body."
Please cited the reference for this sentence.
Petertc (talk) 09:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "instantiations" might be a better word to use here
Talk:Erwin Wilhelm Müller

message: This article gives his birthday as July 13, but on the websites Today in Science History and Britannica Online it says June 13. Which is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.73.31.50 (talk) 20:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I had put June 13 in the text of the original article too (but don't recall where I got it from). It was changed in this edit. --Karnesky (talk) 17:16, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: put back June --Stone (talk) 17:44, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  When was Erwin Mueller Born? 
Talk:Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

message: Could someone clarify the term "commonwealth" for this topic? I knew it formerly only in relation to the British Isles, Canada, Australia and a handful of other former British colonies but have meanwhile read through Commonwealth_%28United_States%29 (a useful link for this article perhaps?)
I'm just wondering if there is any fundamental difference as opposed to "State Courts" ?
--Martixer 21:03, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is called the Commonwealth Court because Pennsylvania is one of 5 US States that are technically Commonwealths. I don't think this needs to be addressed in the article. --RedShiftPA (talk) 23:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is called the Commonwealth Court because that is the name given to it Article 5, Section 4 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.  Why the writers of the constitution chose this particular name is anyone's guess, but RedShiftPA is probably on the right path; Pennsylvania calls itself a "commonwealth," not a "state" (along with Massachusetts, Virginia, and Kentucky).  However, this distinction has no real effect beyond the name itself.  The 4 "commonwealths" are no different - in their judiciary or otherwise - from the other 46 "states." --Msl5046 (talk) 19:11, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Term "Commonwealth" 

message: There needs to be articles on these judges. I will work on that over the next few months.--RedShiftPA (talk) 23:53, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There still need to be articles on judges of the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, and also a category for the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, just like the Superior Court and the Supreme Court. Here is a list of the judges and senior judges, from the court's official web site.
* Dan Pellegrini
* James Gardner Colins
* Bernard L. McGinley
* Rochelle S. Friedman
* Bonnie Brigance Leadbetter
* Keith B. Quigley
* Renée Cohn Jubelirer
* Wesley Oler, Jr.
* Robert "Robin" Simpson
* Mary Hannah Leavitt
* P. Kevin Brobson
* Patricia A. McCullough
* Anne E. Covey
Any editor is free to work on creating articles as needed. --DThomsen8 (talk) 16:09, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judges
Talk:Aquarium fish feed

message: This page appears to be the target of repeated multi-IP vandals who are blanking the page. I'd like to request semi-protection if that's possible? MidgleyDJ 02:14, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Protection not justified at the moment, future requests should be made through WP:RPP. Adambro 13:40, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism 

message: Should Notable in this context be restricted to those which have a wiki page, i.e. which satisfy WP:N? If yes, then should the redlinks go? And again if yes then should a comment to that effect be put at the top of the section to advise future editors?
--ClickRick (talk) 23:20, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable fish food manufacturers 

message: This page needs sources badly. Also it seems a little bit too much like a how-to guide for feeding fish.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larrytheordinarydragon (talk • contribs) 10:48, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I'd fix it myself, but there's an awful lot already on my, um, plate. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:32, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Donald Byrne

message: Indeed he observed the Saturday Sabbath but not sure he was a 7th Day Adventist.--Jrm2007 (talk) 00:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Adpete (talk) 05:26, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Fischer a 7th Day Adventist? 
Talk:Roy Acuff

message: I have removed the "Music career" section as it is a straight ripoff of the text found here, and therefore a copyright violation. I might also add that the language was hardly NPOV, and there were some serious writing blunders in the section, too. If somebody would like to write a nice, neutral, factual section about Roy Acuff's career, that would be wonderful. I'd do it myself, but since I am neither specifically a Roy Acuff fan nor generally a country music fan, I fear I would not do it justice. Kelisi (talk) 10:39, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've re-written most of the article, with the exception of a few stray sentences.  The trivia section also appeared to be a copy-paste, and most of the info in it was either incorrect or unnecessary, so I deleted it.  Bms4880 (talk) 21:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: Could you create a list of all songs by him(you can get it off of allmusic.com) and create a page for each one? Describe where he got the tune from and where he got the words from, unless he created it by himself...not sure how many he created by himself but I'd say there are a good few...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.50.171.227 (talk) 15:08, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Songs + Info