Talk:Certification mark

message: I just did a fairly major edit. The previous version did not jibe with the facts at all where major certification labels or marks are concerned. For instance, there is no such thing as "UL approved", a misnomer that routinely sends chills up UL staff council's spine. I have worked for decades in this field and would point any doubters of my prose to the externally linked pages I added, starting with those of ULC  and SCC .--Achim 03:36, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk

message: :Image:Oulogob.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Oulogob.svg

message: :Image:Nomlogo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:39, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Nomlogo.gif

message: The image :File:Norma Oficial Mexicana logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --18:47, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with File:Norma Oficial Mexicana logo.png

message: Whoever put in the "fair use rational" things for the images (see above) needs to learn the basics of trademark fair use. The images are being used to describe what the marks cover, not to certify this page as being kosher in Mexico. In other words, at least under U.S. law, there is no problem with how they are used.
60.248.2.163 (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why do the bots keep flagging the trademark images 

message: This page is about certifiation marks, but it should be considered, that the CE marking is not a certification mark.
The CE marking is defined in the directives of the European Union, the manufacturer of the product has to mark the products with the marking, after confirming the applicable requirements described in the directives, regulations or standards on the EC declaration of conformity.
It is not necessary, to test any CE marked product at independent and accredited test houses and it is not necessary, to certify any CE marked product at any independent and accredited certification institute.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.108.200.16 (talk) 09:54, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually, according to the previous comment (and also in my opinion), "certification mark" and "conformity mark" are not perfect synonyms, so some source is needed at this regard for checking the correct definitions of these two terms. --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 02:43, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not all conformity marks are certification marks 

message: Cyberbot II has detected links on Certification mark which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global
If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.sgs.com/en/Consumer-Goods-Retail/Electrical-and-Electronics/IT-and-Telecommunication/Certification/Electrical-Safety-Certification.aspx
*:Triggered by \bsgs\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:12, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on [[Certification mark]] 

message: Cyberbot II has detected links on Certification mark which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global
If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.sgs.com/en/Consumer-Goods-Retail/Electrical-and-Electronics/IT-and-Telecommunication/Certification/Electrical-Safety-Certification.aspx
*:Triggered by \bsgs\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:51, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on [[Certification mark]] 

message: The lead section had several dubious statements about certification marks.  These had been tagged since 2012 without any clarification or justification; no reliable sources were provided.  I have cleaned up this section.   Rlsheehan (talk) 13:39, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up tagged material 

message: I've removed the entry for Integrative Pastoral Medicine, as it's primarily an advertisement for a non-accredited, non-scientifically-recognized organization of dubious legal status. Calling something "pastoral medicine" is a legal technique that allows, among other things, non-doctors to claim that any medical advice they give to patients is actually "pastoral" (spiritual guidance) and therefore legal. So far this hasn't held up in courts. (Note that in the US, giving professional medical advice to patients is illegal without a state-issued license.) This is NOT a recognized medical certification or license. The certification doesn't even seem to have published requirements. This particular entry was added by "Rabbishalom", and the CEO of the Integrative Pastoral Medical Association is Dr. Shalomim HaLahawi, who is a rabbi. Hmm...
152.51.56.1 (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Integrative Pastoral Medicine 

message: Hello all! I'd like to make some major updates to this page:
First, I'd like to correctly distinguish between collective and certification marks as designed by WIPO under the TRIPS agreement - happy to take care of this.
Additionally, I'd like to identify the major categories of certification marks - source, materials, and labor - and distinguish from other forms of identifying IP (geographic indicators, etc.), as well as list examples.
I'm going to post this here and hope anyone with issues will comment soon, and hope to dedicate time to make these revisions over the Christmas holiday or early in the new year.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WalletFeminist (talk • contribs) 21:12, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is quite incorrect and very sparse 

message: # I removed this term from the article for now, as it needs to be defined using at least some reputable WP:RS (and no, an apparently commercial site is not a good source). 
# The list of examples needs to be reworked using some source. For example, the CE mark does not seem to belong there, our article describing it states in the lead (AFAIK, correctly): "It is not a quality indicator or a certification mark".
Викидим (talk) 00:04, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conformance  / compliance mark 

message: I have separated the text on this subject into a section for convenience. As-si, it is not supported by any source and is very confusing. The certification mark is described in the laws. What is "approval"? The building inspection apparently described there is not a certification mark by any means. I removed text about an insurance company as it has nothing to do with the subject. Викидим (talk) 00:08, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Certification marks and approvals