Talk:Bleeding Love

message: I have seen a lot of online discussion in which fans seem convinced that this song is supporting self-harm or "cutting." If someone has any reference material that can debunk or support such an argument, it would be helpful information to include in the article. john factorial (talk) 14:16, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Self Harm

message: The articles says 1.5million plays on the internet. The youtube video has 51,668,765 plays alone.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sF84pIhP5UM
90.194.133.46 (talk) 19:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: plays

message: I just want to explain my last edit to the charts table, as my edit summary wouldn't fit! I removed Croatia as the reference only says she's number 1 in the UK. D-z chart had no source and I have no idea what it is or if it's important (it was removed by another user as I was editing and caused an edit conflict). The wrong Eurochart was listed, it should be the Billboard one. I linked the Polish chart ref to an archive page showing the song at its peak, as it was linked to before (making it easier for verification after it's left the chart). The Turkish chart listed is one radio station's chart so not official. The UK and Ireland download charts are not component charts, and the UK R&B chart isn't needed. anemone│projectors 19:06, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: anemone - I've changed the Hungarian peak position back to number 1. It entered at 1 on 8/12, dropped to 5 on 15/12 then back up to 2 on 22/12. Leipzigger98 (talk) 02:06, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that, I've changed the link to an archive showing it at number 1. anemone│projectors 13:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

text: I've just had a quick look and can see what you found. Billboard obviously use different charts to aCharts. I think Billboard make their own whereas aCharts uses official charts. I could be wrong, but if I'm right, we should keep it how it is. Probably something to bring up on WT:CHARTS. anemone│projectors 14:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I had changed Sweden last night then thought like you it was best keeping it as it is now, so changed it back. I wonder if Billboard is using digital only charts in those countries, or as you say just their own internal charts which may include airplay? Leipzigger98 (talk) 15:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

text: There are way too many.  WP:CHARTS suggests a max of 20.  There is currently 40+.  The less notable ones should be taken out.  Also, why are there two Belgian charts? SKS2K6 (talk) 15:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: One of the charts is for the Dutch-speaking region of Flanders, and the other is for the French-speaking region of Wallonia. Frcm1988 (talk) 19:13, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Charts table

message: The article has changed release dated for the single in the USA over two occasions, however both of these dates are in the past, and there seems to be no sign of how bleeidng love has charted in the States, is this a mistake, or has the single simply not charted at all in the country??  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.207.161.122 (talk) 12:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: US Charts

message: Is the German CD release date correct? It's entered the chart with the issue date 1 February, so it seems unlikely that it was released on 11 January. anemone│projectors 20:38, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Confirmed by a source I just found. anemone│projectors 16:34, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Germany

message: I requested some info re: the Spanish charts.
Q: Can someone clear up a question for me? What is the official Spain singles chart? Such that when someone says Rihanna hit #1 in the USA, UK, Germany and Spain with Umbrella, which Spanish chart do they refer to?
I've found what seem to be three main charts:
a) Promusicae Top 20 Singles y Maxis
b) Promusicae Listas De Descargas De Canciones (Downloads)
c) Los 40 Principales Lista 40
Any help appreciated.
A: Both Promusicae are official, one is for the physical sales and the other is only for downloads. The most important is the downloads chart since the physical single market is dead. The most popular chart in Spain is "Los 40 Principales", though it is not what it used to be anymore. It is based on votes of users.
As such I think we should concentrate on the Promusicae download chart. Unfortunately they only publish a top 10 on their site and on Los40.com. Top 20s are published elsewhere such as on the forums at ukmix.org. Leipzigger98 (talk) 16:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we can list one chart until it enters the more official one. anemone│projectors 20:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. We'll stick with the Los 40. Leipzigger98 (talk) 16:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spain

message: "we should use the official chart - (as they are doing on Dutch Wikipedia http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bleeding_Love)"
The chart we were already using, the GfK Top 100 is one of the three official charts in the Netherlands.
The Dutch Top 40 is airplay and sales and chart rules.
The Mega Top 50 is airplay and sales.
The Mega Single Top 100 is official sales only.
The Nederlandse Top 40 (Dutch Top 40) has some extremely arcane chart rules, but is broadcast by Radio 538 and used by TMF. The GfK Top 100 (formerly the Mega Single Top 100) is the music industry chart and the one used by the Dutch version of Top Of The Pops.
I say we go with the latter because of its sales only format, and its recognition by the music industry.
Whether the person who wrote the Bleeding Love page on the Netherlands wiki agrees is irrelvant. Leipzigger98 (talk) 18:11, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I apologise, I got the impression you changed the chart because it was sales only, not because it was official, but I was wrong. If you haven't already, feel free to change it back. anemone│projectors 18:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Netherlands

message: Out of interest why are all the charts being referenced to this source? Surely it would be better to reference the official chart sites in each case, many of which update faster than acharts? It's just a fan site from what I can tell, and thus their choice of chart (for example in the Netherlands, Spain, Italy etc) is arbitary. Leipzigger98 (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It doesn't really matter if we don't reference the official sites as aCharts uses them itself. Also, many official sites don't have archives, which are helpful for verification. aCharts has trajectories, so you can easily verify lots of information from just one page. aCharts is used to reference a lots of Wikipedia articles, including featured articles, so if you have a problem with it, I suggest you take it up at WP:SONGS or somewhere like that. anemone│projectors 21:37, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: To illustrate my point is today's update of the Italian chart to an acharts reference. acharts doesn't state which chart they're using, but it is definitely the Musica & Dischi chart where Bleeding Love is number 1 for a second week. This isn't the official FIMI chart which we previously referenced where Leona was number 4 last week and is number 3 this (not updated yet on the FIMI site). Leipzigger98 (talk) 14:36, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with you about Italy and have reverted the change. But in most cases, we know aCharts uses the official chart and it's handy for the trajectories etc. anemone│projectors 16:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree entirely with that, but always worth keeping an eye on which chart they're using in case they sneek in an unofficial one. In the two competing Netherlands charts Leona is #3 this week which helps ;-) Leipzigger98 (talk) 02:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a list of charts they use at the side of their website, so they're unlikely to sneak in any new ones. anemone│projectors 10:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's just a list of countries in most cases - they're not specific as to which chart they're using in each country hence the Italian confusion where they use the alternative Musica E Dischi chart. They don't specify as they need permission from each of the publishers to post the charts. Leipzigger98 (talk) 14:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: But we should be able to work out which charts they're using so we'll know where we can use aCharts as a reference and when we can't. anemone│projectors 15:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: acharts.us

message: Does the Mexican Hot 100 even exist? The México Top 100 (here) doesn't mention Leona in its chart. I can't find a chart on the website listed on Mexican Hot 100, although I don't speak Spanish so I don't know where to look. Anyone know? anemone│projectors 21:03, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was just about to post the same having spent half an hour looking for it - all the links on the wikipedia page are bogus. Should have checked here first! I recommend we delete it. Leipzigger98 (talk) 12:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We should remove it from here, I'll tag the articles as possible hoaxes. anemone│projectors 13:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mexican Hot 100 for the deletion discussion. --Stormie (talk) 04:05, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mexico

message: I am pretty certain that the song has been released in the Unites States, but I cannot see Bleeding Love listed in any of the charts, has it not been made fully available for purchase yet, is it climbing the charts (like the Canadian Hot 100), or has it not managed to chart at all. I have seen many reviews by profesionals and the public in the USA, all positive, so if it is getting such rave reviews, then why has it not managed the Top 100, can someone please clear this up User:Stevvvv4444 (talk) 21:36, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was released to download in December 2007, and had a major radio launch about a week or so ago. Someone keeps adding that it's number 111 in the Billboard Hot 100 but really they mean 11 in the Hot 100 Bubbling Under Chart or whatever it's called. But I can only see the top 10 of that chart so can't verify it. anemone│projectors 21:57, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: United States

message: Is there currently any reference on quality of the samples used in this song? The vocals are very good, but seriously someone must have commented before on the clipped baseline?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.84.249.129 (talk) 00:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Recording quality of this single

message: As we appear to have no way of updating these chart placings (the reference is to Leona Lewis's official site and hasn't been updated in a number of weeks) I recommend we remove both charts. Leipzigger98 (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That sounds like a good idea to me. anemone│projectors 18:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now removed. Leipzigger98 (talk) 02:28, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Turkish/Hong Kong Airplay charts

message: I understand that you are using the Mega Singles Top 100 for the Netherlands chart position but why do you removed the category "Number-one singles in the Netherlands", because that category is clearly applied for the songs that reached the top of the Dutch Top 40.
Frcm1988 (talk) 05:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The Dutch Top 40 is definitely the main singles chart in the Netherlands, while the Mega Single Top 100 is only a component chart, and component charts should be avoided unless the song failed to chart on the main chart. Using the Mega Single Top 100 instead of the Dutch Top 40 is the same thing as using the Hot 100 Singles Sales instead of the Billboard Hot 100. Funk Junkie (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've argued strongly for the Mega Single Top 100 but my resolve is weakening - what do Dutch wiki users consider the official chart? Is there any dispute between the two over which is "official" or is there no argument that everyone considers the Dutch Top 40 to be officially recognised? Leipzigger98 (talk) 20:15, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The Dutch Wikipedia article for Bleeding Love uses the Dutch Top 40. I'm starting to agree that we should use it instead of the other one. anemone│projectors 15:13, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyway, it appears to be number one in both charts anyway so it doesn't matter as much now ;) anemone│projectors 15:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dutch Top 40

message: Someone has added a 'German special edition single' with a supposed B-side 'You Bring Me Down', but there is NO CATALOG number to justify it exists, and the deceptive citation takes you to a German Amazon page which has NO TRACKLIST information. Who else is in favor of its removal?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reqluce (talk • contribs) 11:49, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Me. I already removed it. anemone│projectors 13:25, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, "You Bring Me Down" is the B-side to "Better in Time". anemone│projectors 14:00, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dodgy 'German Special Edition single'

message: Does anyone know how the song is doing in the Billboard Hot 100 Airplay chart? anemone│projectors 13:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Bleeding Love" hasn't charted there as yet, but as it has already charted on the Billboard Hot 100, the Hot 100 Airplay should not be added. Funk Junkie (talk) 19:35, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was sure to have charted there as it's position in the Hot 100 is based purely on airplay at the moment, is it not? I don't want to put it on the chart list, I know it's a component chart, but I wanted to mention it in the airplay section. I've checked that link many times before but I just noticed the list of charts it's been in at the side of the page - very handy, thank you. anemone│projectors 21:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh wait, I forgot it's already available to download :) anemone│projectors 21:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: What is available for download? The song? Funk Junkie (talk) 17:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, "Bleeding Love" was released to U.S. iTunes in December. anemone│projectors 18:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Billboard Hot 100 Airplay

message: We're currently using the VIVA chart for Hungary, but this is a TV station. The official Hungarian charts are compiled by Mahasz and searching their archive shows "Bleeding Love" peaking at number 26 in their radio chart, but nothing for the singles chart. I suggest changing it in the article. anemone│projectors 18:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hungary

message: Why is there 'Leone Lewis single Chronology', 'Leona Lewis unofficial single chronology', and 'Spirit track listing'? So redundant, and what's the point of it? Also having track listing order is sooooooo useless, I wonder who invented it, cos it appears on so many wikipedia pages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zone (talk • contribs) 13:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you think it's not needed, you should probably bring it up on another page. Maybe Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs. But not here. anemone│projectors 18:28, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Single Chronology, etc

message: As there are so many charts listed in the table, would anyone object to the removal of the airplay charts? The informaion would not be totally lost, as I would use that information to expand the airplay section. anemone│projectors 10:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Airplay

message: I just think that an official remixes section shoul be made. I'm not a fan, have no clue what was released...
If you are not a fan it should not bother you in the first place unless you're out on a mission to put offical remix sections to all wikipedia song pages. The fact that you also have no clue highlights the futility. In any case there is only ONE official remix, the Jason Nevis Extended Mix and it does not warrant its own section. Reqluce (talk) 12:21, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's four other official mixes: two by Moto Blanco and two by Shapeshifters. All 5 (incl. the Jason Nevins mix) appear on a promotional CD in the USA aimed at Dance stations and DJs. Leipzigger98 (talk) 15:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Official remixes

message: Lewis's Bleeding Love has been getting immense airplay in India too...D'you think it merits an add here "Bleeding Love" was a hit on radio stations around the world, reaching number one in the airplay charts of the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Germany,[74] France,[75] Australia,[76] New Zealand, Croatia,[77] Slovenia,[78] Luxembourg,[79] Latvia,[80] Slovakia[81] and Estonia.[82] ?? 122.161.21.184 (talk) 06:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: India airplay

message: ???? What is that? The only Japanese official chart is Oricon... That Japan Billboard Hot 100 might be one of those charts created by Billboard that measures the airplay and sales of some countries, but that is NOT official... This should be changed or replaced by official information... McMare's (talk) 05:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see here. Billboard Japan Charts began on February 18 of this year.　It is updated on every Wednesday in  Japan(here), and it is updated in the billboard.com/Tsutaya Online on every Thursday. Thank you.--Tsukamoto (talk) 03:46, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Japan Billboard Hot 100?

message: Where can it be varified that Hilary Duff co-wrote this song? I could not find that in any of the sources and it shocked me to see that? Khanyisagantsho (talk) 14:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Songwriters

message: On XM Channel 21 (Kiss), I heard a fast, sped up version of "Bleeding Love". Did anyone else here this?Cssiitcic (talk) 18:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fast Version

message: "The song is about being a hemophiliac." - Surely this is pointless? I think it's obvious that the lyrics are metaphorical for love, and are definitely not about actually bleeding.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.217.184.88 (talk) 10:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Hemophiliac?

message: Hi there. Its confusing because the opening says it was the bestselling song in the us in 2008, however the year end section states it was the 2nd. Should this be cleared up or is me simply missing something. I remember seeing the run up on billboard.com in January and Flo Rida's Low was number 1, which fits with the table. I cant find this page anymore. Which is correct? Many Thanks Jambo-numba1 (talk) 10:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "nd or 1st best selling?

message: I have tagged The darker quality of superimposing the second half of the verse, as well as the final chorus over this VI chord progression, in addition to resolving the song on this relative minor, enhances the intensity of the pain and pathos of the song. as a POV statement. I would have removed or rewritten it if I actually understood it. The line In "Bleeding Love" the turn around from the common I, vi, IV, V (F, Dm, Bb, C) progression used exclusively up to the bridge for both verses and choruses shifts to focus on the relative minor: vi, IV, I/V, V (Dm, Bb, F/C, C). needs a citation, but again, to me it makes no sense. Could it be expanded and explained? AnemoneProjectors 19:59, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically, the chord progression of the song changes from a major to minor key. If you superimposed the first chorus on top of the final chorus, you would get dissonance. Although the melody remains the same, the chord progression changes. Songs written in major keys, by convention, always back "happy" songs, whereas songs written in minor keys back painful, sad, or solemn songs. Because of the chord progression shift, the song switches from F major to D minor ("happy" to "sad"). If you pay attention to the backing track, you'll hear that the song ends in a darker tone than it began, even though the melody is exactly the same as it began. This is because of the shift... I think that's the best way I could explain it. Sorry if it just made it worse.  Midnightgarden (talk) 14:49, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense, yes. I had noticed the shift though it doesn't feel "sad" :) AnemoneProjectors 16:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Music structure and lyrics

message: For anyone looking to fix/remove the dead external links the marked references are numbers 17, 52, 83, 85, 131, 134, and 135. --vgmddg (look | talk | do) 00:13, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Articles with dead external links|Articles with dead external links]] Hide-&-Seek Answers 

message: You can see in the source that it is certified 4xPlatium in the US.  I do not know why someone changed it to Platinum. —Preceding comment added by wiki4tune 14:33, 9 December 2010 
:You are misreading the source. It says the Digital single (DI) was awarded GOLD, and then PLATINUM, both on 04/24/2008, and the Mobile RINGTONE (MT) was certified the same. Ringtone charts don't count, so it's only single platinum. AnemoneProjectors 15:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bleeding Love US certification

message: Perhaps it's unnecessary, but shouldn't there be a section about Jesse Mccartney's version of the song? After all, he did help write the song. How come there's a section about Tom Dice's version (I'd never even heard him before), but not Jesse's?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.140.204 (talk) 20:46, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesse Mccartney's Version 

message: I know nobody will probably read this or bother to comment but I would like to see the genres left in the lead section here and in other songs, where they have been removed. The reasons are: the lead summarises the entire article so because it's mentioned in the article is a good reason to have it in the lead, not a reason to remove it from the lead; a genre of song is a very important part of that song - it gives readers an idea of what the song is about, and is therefore very helpful to include in the lead section; and other song articles may not include the genre in the lead but many others do, and you shouldn't remove something just because another article doesn't have it - it would be better to add it to article then remove it from them. –AnemoneProjectors– 14:55, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've always included the genre(s) in the lead.  — ₳aron 15:02, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

text: I don't have any problem with them being left in the lead; I used to remove genres from lead sentences but stopped because there is no consistency whether or not to remove or include them there...half of song articles have them in and half don't. To include the genre in the lead sentence doesn't put a non-neutral spin on the article like "Grammy-award winning" or "unsuccessful" does. The only thing I'd do is have them unlinked, as they are common links. Acalamari 15:04, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh good, I did get replies after all :-) This also applies to Better in Time where the genre was removed. I've reinserted it in both. –AnemoneProjectors– 11:13, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

text: What genre section? The genre is discussed under "Composition". Per WP:LEAD: "The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the topic is notable, and summarize the most important points" - that would include a song's genre. –AnemoneProjectors– 22:11, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre in lead  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Bleeding Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080121170420/http://www.billboard.com:80/bbcom/charts/chart_display.jsp?g=Singles&f=European+Hot+100+Singles to http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/charts/chart_display.jsp?g=Singles&f=European+Hot+100+Singles
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130703035714/http://www.billboard.com/charts/year-end/2008/canadian-hot-100 to http://www.billboard.com/charts/year-end/2008/canadian-hot-100
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100311072228/http://www.mtv.de/charts/Jahrescharts2008 to http://www.mtv.de/charts/Jahrescharts2008
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131022202531/http://www.billboard.com/charts/year-end/2008/japan-hot-100 to http://www.billboard.com/charts/year-end/2008/japan-hot-100
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Bleeding Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110722145903/http://www.exonline.com.mx/XStatic/excelsior/template/content.aspx?se=nota&id=175833 to http://www.exonline.com.mx/XStatic/excelsior/template/content.aspx?se=nota&id=175833
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081211051504/http://www.billboard.com:80/bbcom/esearch/chart_display.jsp?cfi=344&cfgn=Singles&cfn=Bubbling+Under+Hot+100+Singles&ci=3091539&cdi=9667806&cid=02%2F16%2F2008 to http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/chart_display.jsp?cfi=344&cfgn=Singles&cfn=Bubbling+Under+Hot+100+Singles&ci=3091539&cdi=9667806&cid=02%2F16%2F2008
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101213013408/http://www.bbc.co.uk:80/programmes/b00pfmpl to http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00pfmpl#synopsis
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:57, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bleeding Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ifpi.org/content/section_news/plat_month_20081022.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.grammy.com/grammy_awards/51st_show/list.aspx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display.asp?chart=1U50
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100413105710/http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-top-100-singles-2008.htm to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-top-100-singles-2008.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100722162159/http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart_annual.asp to http://www.rianz.org.nz/rianz/chart_annual.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719010101/http://www.hitlistan.se/netdata/ghl002.mbr/lista?liid=43&dfom=20080001&newi=0&height=420&platform=Win32&browser=MSIE&navi=no&subframe=Mainframe to http://www.hitlistan.se/netdata/ghl002.mbr/lista?liid=43&dfom=20080001&newi=0&height=420&platform=Win32&browser=MSIE&navi=no&subframe=Mainframe
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131013201503/http://swisscharts.com/year.asp?key=2008 to http://www.swisscharts.com/year.asp?key=2008
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:01, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Bleeding Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120209131137/http://www.roty.tv/ to http://www.roty.tv/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080214222939/http://www.radioandrecords.com:80/formats/charts/euro/Greece.asp to http://www.radioandrecords.com/formats/charts/euro/Greece.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131224110249/http://www.austriancharts.at/2008_single.asp to http://www.austriancharts.at/2008_single.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120404175938/http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/page-259376.xml?year=2008 to http://www.disqueenfrance.com/fr/page-259376.xml?year=2008
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130621061430/http://promusicae.es/files/listasanuales/canciones/Top%2050%20CANCIONES%20%20ANUAL%202008.pdf to http://www.promusicae.es/files/listasanuales/canciones/Top%2050%20CANCIONES%20%20ANUAL%202008.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100917082727/http://aria.com.au/pages/documents/2000sDecadeChartssingles.pdf to http://www.aria.com.au/pages/documents/2000sDecadeChartssingles.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140103022302/http://australian-charts.com/bestall.asp?page=1 to http://australian-charts.com/bestall.asp?page=1
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120111062825/http://charts.org.nz:80/bestall.asp to http://charts.org.nz/bestall.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:59, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 12 external links on Bleeding Love. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ifpi.org/content/section_news/plat_month_20081022.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071109081725/http://www.rcalabelgroup.co.uk/news/7024/ to http://www.rcalabelgroup.co.uk/news/7024/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.grammy.com/GRAMMY_Awards/51st_Show/list.aspx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ariacharts.com.au/pages/charts_display.asp?chart=1U50
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.radioandrecords.com/formats/charts/euro/Greece.asp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/esearch/chart_display.jsp?cfi=344&cfgn=Singles&cfn=Bubbling%20Under%20Hot%20100%20Singles&ci=3091539&cdi=9667806&cid=02%2F16%2F2008
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090520053315/http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/chart_beat/bonus.jsp to http://billboard.com/bbcom/chart_beat/bonus.jsp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090520053315/http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/chart_beat/bonus.jsp to http://billboard.com/bbcom/chart_beat/bonus.jsp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/charts/chart_display.jsp?g=Singles&f=European%20Hot%20100%20Singles
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://charts.org.nz/bestall.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080731233840/http://www.sonybmg.com.au/news/details.do?newsId=20030829005243 to http://www.sonybmg.com.au/news/details.do?newsId=20030829005243
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified