lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eco (currency)

message: Someone needs top update the stautus of this. All the refs are from mid to late 2007 ! Passportguy (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the info a bit, but someone with more expertise should look into this in more detail. Passportguy (talk) 19:14, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 

message: The capitalisation "Eco" used in the article is unusual, as in English, currencies are usually spelled in lowercase. However, some sources in the article spell it as "ECO" . Anybody care to weigh in? Daß Wölf 23:29, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eco, eco or ECO? 

message: According to this article. The original Africa's planned eco zone was to include 15 states. 
:"Martial Ze Belinga, a Cameroonian economist, told DW: "In a way, we now have two Ecos. One that the 15 African countries voted for and whose name was already decided in 2003. And today there is a new Eco which France and the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU) countries have chosen — independently of the others."--2A02:ED0:5FC5:DB00:9DAC:918D:D67F:70A7 (talk) 12:57, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historybdarkafka 

message: More certainly, it is an poor translation (maybe from google translate) and copy paste from something, especially in the latter paragraphs. Anyone to fix it? 188.73.194.219 (talk) 17:30, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The History section is problematic
Talk:Alfonso II of Aragon

message: Was Alfonso II not married 1st to (and divorced from) Mathilde (or Mafalde) of Portugal? ----Michael K. Smith 19:37, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  First marriage? 

message: The name is not "Alfonso" but "Alfons" since he was not a castillan king and 'therefore' did not bear spanish name... I thus propose to rename the page "Alfons II" as in the reference catalan page.
----
In fact his true name (after being renamed from Ramon Berenguer) was Ildefons, Alfonso and Alfons are the modern spanish and catalan/occitan version of this name.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.235.29.103 (talk) 17:06, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Aren't at least some of his works classed as Occitan rather than Catalan? 41.241.40.51 (talk) 19:45, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occitan-language poet? 
Talk:Pope John III

message: F. Chobot has civil name of Pope John III Caselinus. It seems, it is print-error, because allover exists as Caselinus. --Stebunik (talk) 12:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catelinus or Caselinus 

message: User StevenL added the following text on 2005-10-26:
It is often thought by religious scholars that Pope John III was actually a woman named Jonah who disguised herself as a man. Pete McCourt finds that this effeminate pope sat in a special chair such that bishops would not find out.
I am unable to find any hint of evidence that anything of the sort is true, and I'm removing that text pending clarification from StevenL. There are stories of a "Pope Joan" who called herself John, but (1) they are pretty much universally disbelieved and (2) they aren't applied to John III anyway. And there are stories of a special chair in connection with "Pope Joan", but (1) they are pretty much universally disbelieved and (2) the point was allegedly to reveal rather than to conceal. StevenL, if you see this: please clarify. Thanks! Gareth McCaughan 19:49, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ecamsule

message: 72.1.206.20 corrected my original mistake.
From the EPA: "Two types of UV radiation reach the Earth's surface: UVA and UVB. UVB is usually associated with sunburn while UVA is recognized as a deeper penetrating radiation." --betakate 16:16, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  UVA vs. UVB 

message: Sunscreens based on mexoryl have been available in Canada, Europe and other parts of the world since 1993, but it is still awaiting FDA approval for sale in the United States.
:Considering the fact that dozens of new drugs have been developed and aproved for use in the US since 1993, could someone explain why a safe and effective sunscreen like Mexoryl has not been approved, or expand this article to include the circumstances and status of approval? —Viriditas | Talk 12:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There may have been dozens of drugs approved since 1993, but that's dozens out of how many? Plenty of American drug candidates make it to the pre-approval stage and never get approved. The FDA approval process is one of the most stringent processes in the world, in part because the manufacturer must show that the drug is safe throughout a wide range of concentrations, must document the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of the drug, must ensure that the drug gains no unexpected reactivity with exposure to UV radiation, etc. A delay in approval is far from the exception, it's actually far more typical for a drug candidate to be delayed rather than to be given a quick green light. --chodges 06:05, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  FDA approval 

message: Mexoryl → Ecamsule – Mexoryl® is a trade name. — Talk:Mexoryl — Fvasconcellos 19:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
oppose Ecamsule is already an article. I think a merger is a better choice. --Edgelord 05:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Strong support.  I was just about to perform the move myself when I came here.  Alvis 21:07, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
oppose Ecamsule is already an article. I think a merger is a better choice. --Edgelord 05:55, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: :Strong support.  I was just about to perform the move myself when I came here.  Alvis 21:07, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:John W. Nordstrom

message: is the best —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.109.70.238 (talk) 03:00, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nordstorms  

message: Did John Nordstrom anglicize his middle name for Whilhelm to William or was it just W? GregAllenB2007 (talk) 20:39, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  W. Or William
Talk:Cryptogram

message: Shajju  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2401:4900:4AAC:8869:1:0:8E7:797E (talk) 07:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

message: Printed receipts from e.g. Waitrose (British supermarket) include a something labelled "cryptogram" which is a sequence of letters and numbers. It's clearly not a puzzle but perhaps some kind of credit card validation hash; does anybody have any ideas? 86.153.9.80 (talk) 17:26, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Cryptograms are hard to do  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.54.218 (talk) 03:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hi 

message: I find this entire section inapproriate for an article about puzzles.
The topic is more relevant to the science of cryptography, and I believe it's already covered there sufficiently.
I would like to remove the section from the article, unless someone objects.
There are some non-relevant details in the introductory paragraph as well.
The article really seems to need a cleanup.
T71024 19:16, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cryptograph Secret Key 

message: : Cryptograms were ... created ... in the Spartan military in fifth century B.C.  This code consisted of a staff around which a strip of paper was wrapped without overlapping. A message was written on the paper, which was then unwrapped and sent on its way. The message could only be correctly decoded with the right diameter of stick.
That's not a substitution cipher.  The whole section is more a history of cryptography than of cryptograms.  The whole article is kind of crap. --68.40.186.209 (talk) 05:41, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "History" of cryptograms 

message: The Zodiac killer did not send cryptograms, he sent one polyalphabetic substitution cipher and 3 apparent hoaxes, and I don't see what a serial killer has to do with a wiki about a game.
Skintigh (talk) 18:25, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zodiac killer
Talk:Sharwood's

message: I have removed the section on food safety. The Food Standard Agency publications suggest nowhere that adulterated Basmati was sold solely under the Sharwood brand, other brands were similarly deceptive. Neither are Sharwood pickles the only ones manufactured with mustard oil. (Mustard oil is prized in Bangladesh and India for its flavour.)
I also see no mention of the word "Sharwood" in the FSA bulletin on food irradiation.
Neither of these incidents made the news or are particularly related to the Sharwood brand and thus should be removed. C'mon folks, this isn't a forum for Sharwood-bashing. Pilatus 20:07, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Food safety

message: Interesting seeing that extremely little about Sharwood's founding is found on their website. I've found this detailed rundown, from what looks like a group of local historians for Offley, where the company began: http://www.ovalpartnership.org.uk/kennington-oval-vauxhall-history/notable-buildings/offley-works/sharwoods-story.html (archived version) Comes with sources for the information given, including that some of it was supplied by Sharwood's themselves. If anyone wants to add a History section, there's a good amount of information you could work off here. --Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ( me!) 21:22, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential source for company history
Talk:Vashon, Washington

message: It should be noted that removing someone from the People of Note section just you do not agree with them in anyway is not ethical. Just because you do not like someone does not mean they are not a person of note and open this page top people removing certain people for purely personal reasons. If you thing a person is on the list who should not be, bring it up on the discussion page. CollegeZoo 03:05, 8 February 2006
Vashon is kewl.
Shouldn't there be some mention of Camp Sealth on Vashon Island? Micahbrwn 06:40, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The first sentence makes it sound like Vashon is the largest island in Puget Sound. It is not. 166.102.251.225 (talk) 15:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest Island in Puget Sound? 

message: "If you have a child that does not mind being molested vashon is a perfect place. Racial issues and drugs are prevalent. Arrogance and domestic abuse is a favorite pass time of much of the community, along with excessive drinking and rape. Depending on the color of the suspects skin, most crime go unreported. Hispanics and black are welcome to a degree, as long as they can accommodate the "white makes right" attitude. Most crimes go unreported due to fear of retaliation by locals. Most popular drug of choice is methamphetamine, Oxycontin and cocaine."
This editorial did not belong in the articleRichardBond (talk) 07:38, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editorial removed from article 

message: So is Vashon now a Census Designated Place, i.e. unincorporated King County, or is it a town, i.e. a small, second-tier municipality? It is listed both in List of towns in Washington and in List of CDPs in Washington, but the formatting seems to suggest that at some point between 2010 and 2013 it crossed the threshold into townhood. This article says it is a CDP, but that may be outdated information. --Haruo (talk) 08:59, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  CDP or Town? 

message: A huge chunk of the notable references is unsourced. A lot of the information comes from local information ("everybody knows" that Alex Borstein lived on the island for a little while, for example) but I don't think that's good enough. I'm adding a few more sources where I can find them (ex: Booth Gardner), but I don't intend to look through them all. I see some discussion from 14 years ago earlier on the talk page. Any objections if I nuke all but the sourced entries? Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 01:09, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable residents
Talk:Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

message: I recently changed the opening of this article to read "The Supreme Court of Puerto Rico is the highest court of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, having the ultimate judicial authority within Puerto Rico to interpret and decide questions of Puerto Rican Commonwealth law."  I replaced "state law," which probably came from some sort of boilerplate for state supreme courts, with "Puerto Rican Commonwealth law."  This was further modified to "..decide questions regarding the Constitution of Puerto Rico."  Now I'm sure the court does deal with Puerto Rican constitutional matters but is it correct to say that it deals with simple statute law as well?  Or does it only handle constitutional questions? --Jfruh 20:14, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Law vs. Constitution

message: Puerto Rico had a Supreme Court under the Foraker Act of 1900 and the Jones-Shafroth Act of 1917.  This was clearly a predecessor of the current Puerto Rico Supreme Court; in fact, I am not sure that the court recognized in the Puerto Rico Constitution of 1952 is considered a new court, as opposed to a continuation of the prior court.  Should the 1900-1952 era be recognized in this article? Newyorkbrad 15:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier Supreme Court? 

message: The Appointments section appears biased on political issues. I know these things exist, but they should not be mentioned unless adequate sources are found. - Mtmelendez (TALK|UB|HOME) 19:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: Can anyone provide a link that indicates the order in which the new justices were nominated?
hanncommander (talk) 21:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seniority 

message: Chief Justice Hernández Denton was appointed an associate justice in the '80's by Hernández Colón and elevated to Chief Justice in 2004 by Sila Calderón.  That is not clearly portrayed in the table and should somehow be rearranged. Pr4ever (talk) 00:49, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chief Justice table
Talk:Satin

message: %deleted%
:Um, what? —Keenan Pepper 23:01, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why don't you be bold and change it? —Keenan Pepper 06:23, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And what's wrong with nylon? I wish I could find some usable nylon fabric! Anyway, I'll be bold; the only "satin" I can find these days is polyester (maybe silk, but I'm not looking for silk, whereas I do looking for nylon). I just bought some and was wondering if "satin" refers to a material or something else (now I know). If someone can verify that polyester is now the most commonly used material, I would note it in the article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.14.154.80 (talk • contribs) . --Kjoonlee 17:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphaned discussions

message: There are three types of basic weaves (see, e.g., articles on Plain weave or Weaving): Plain weave, Twill weave and Satin weave.  The articles on the first two have useful diagrams showing the structure of the weft and warp threads.  This article does not.  It should, for consistency, completeness and usefulness.
: Excellent point. I'll see if I can find something. Mabalu (talk) 14:09, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram please! 

message: Should antique satin be added to the list of types of satin?
Leschnei (talk) 02:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antique satin 

message: Idk how to edit the caption of the first picture but it has weft and warp swtiched around. Alayambo (talk) 21:09, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warp is vertical. Weft is across. 

message: The etymology of "satin" as derived from "Zayton" is not supported by the Quanzhou page or the wiktionary entry for satin. 135.0.176.61 (talk) 07:51, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin
Talk:Hakham

message: This is a copy of my message to User:Sheynhertz-Unbayg: "Hi Sheynhertz: Why are you moving articles with Hebrew words around? I noticed you moved Hakham to Chakham which makes no sense, see my reasons and request for it to be moved back to Hakham at  because, for example, we use this convention in the cases of Halakha, Hanukkah, Humash, Hazzan, Hivites, Horites, Hebron, Hermon, Horeb, Habakkuk, Ham, Hur, Heshbon etc. Most times, there are good reasons for the spellings as they follow an accepted convention, and it's best to leave them until you can be absolutely sure that it's safe to make changes in Hebrew-named articles. (You may also want to see some of trhe discussions taking place at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Hebrew). Thanks for your attention. IZAK 20:15, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Request to revert back to Hakham

message: The article states: "In the Muslim world, a rabbi was often called a ḥākhām because al-Rab is one of the names of God in Islam and may have caused offense due to misunderstanding."
The Wikipedia article on Rabb states: "Ar-Rabb is not one of the 99 names (or attributes) of Allah.
There seems to be some inconsistency.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Not2late (talk • contribs) 17:39, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Rabb as Islamic name of God
Talk:James R. Zazzali

message: Rated as "high importance" given the fact that he's head of one of the partitions of government. 68.39.174.238 02:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Changhsingian

message: The article that talks about recovery after the Permian-Triassic extinction appears to be from 1636 and according to newer research, the recovery of certain groups of marine animals, such as vertebrates, was likely quick. 
See http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0088987 for an example.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vvardenfell (talk • contribs) 13:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recovery information may be outdated
Talk:Total air temperature

message: Total Air Temperature is a term used generally in aviation. It is the temperature measured approximately by a temperature probe mounted on the surface of the aircraft by or on the pitot intakes. It is higher than the static air temperature due to the translational energy of the molecules hitting the proble while the aircraft is in motion. 
In summary, an aircraft in motion with a true airspeed will have a TAT greater (hotter) than the static air temperature by itself.
--
Perhaps this article should be merged with the article for stagnation temperature.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.52.215.1 (talk) 00:20, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

message: This is simply a wrong redirect.  Total air temperature is defined correctly here and is completely separate from static temperature.  If anything, based on the encyclopedia article, it would be best suited redirecting to the main temperature article, perhaps to the section on theoretical definition.  128.6.73.200 (talk) 18:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Thanks for pointing it out.  I have amended the redirect so that it now goes to Temperature.  Dolphin51 (talk) 00:42, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Static temperature redirect 
Talk:Gulf of Tonkin

message: Clearly someone thinks that the Gulf of Tonkin was not a fabricated incident designed to trick the Congress and the American people.
Can some other wiki users weigh in here?  It's not difficult to gather the evidence to prove the case one way or the other.  I'm just in the middle of finals, so I can't do it right now...--BlackberryLaw 20:35, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Source #2 under the reference section is a broken link to the NSA website.  
98.145.65.253 (talk) 17:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference #2 is a broken link 

message: Shouldn't there be some mention of the maritime dispute that exists here between Viet Nam and China.  ludahai 魯大海 (talk) 03:32, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maritime dispute
Talk:Provenance

message: I have removed the following from the intro:
 
Provenance issues regarding works of art and cultural artifacts is a largely taboo subject within the museum discipline.
There was no supporting citation and the text of the article points out that many museums and galleries are researching Nazi era provenance of works of art and publishing the results. I suspect that whoever added it was referring to disputed ownership of artifacts such as the Elgin Marbles where there is a dispute about validity of ownership transfers. Anyway, I think it needs to be more specific and certainly needs a citation. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 08:39, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Hadn't seen that - it seems nonsense to me. Johnbod (talk) 11:07, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed with Johnbod. It's a PoV-pushing exercise by someone who thinks all museums are engaged in illegal/unethical antiquities trade.  That assumption was actually mostly true about 2 generations ago, but times have changed. — SMcCandlish    Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib.  11:18, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

text: Hello, anybody interested in taking the recent developments in provenance research into account? Here's a possible starting point:https://www.artnews.com/2019/06/11/african-art-repatriation-american-museums/ Munfarid1 (talk) 13:14, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - adding that. Johnbod (talk) 14:52, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a great article! Madisonroberts97 (talk) 12:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  provenance taboo? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Marissa4113 (talk) 23:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Conservation Genetics
Talk:Battle of Derna (1805)

message: There were a number of land battles in what is now Canada during the Revolutionary War. I'm changing it to overseas. MayerG (talk) 05:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  First foreign land battle? 

message: U.S. soldiers have recently been added as present at the battle; I know of no references that say anything other than U.S. Marines were there. Can a reference for the soldiers be provided? MayerG (talk) 04:47, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.S. Army? 

message: It appears that the more common spelling for this battle is "Derna" & recommend changing to that name.  Even Wikipedia has the city listed as Derna. Thanks! FieldMarine (talk) 13:41, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I noticed the same and have changed all instances, except in titles. BiologicalMe (talk) 17:29, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling of name 