lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Paradummy

message: All of the links listed should be consolidated into one, as they all are linked to the same site. Tom 04:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Jooler 11:06, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: Surely the second "Oscar" picture  is of one of the dummies used for "The Longest Day" (or a replica) and not really one of the ones uses on D-Day. Jooler 22:47, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://web.archive.org/web/20040221022241/http://home.att.net/~1.elliott/paratrooperdummyhistorysite.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:40, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Charles Hammann

message: This article has said since 2005 that the rescue occurred off the Italian coast, when in fact it happened near the big Austrian naval base in Istria, now Croatia.
This leads one to wonder whether being within the scope of so many different projects actually amounts to anything at all.
Varlaam (talk) 18:05, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Austria, not Italy
Talk:Danse Macabre (book)

message: Danse Macabre is in French for, obviously, macabre dance.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.193.117.114 (talk) 21:41, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, but that doesn't belong in this article. Canonblack 04:13, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The opening line, "...a non-fiction book by Stephen King, about horror fiction in print, radio, film and comics, and the genre's influence on United States popular culture" doesn't seem right. The book discusses how changes in culture and society were reflected in the genre (eg mistrust of science/scientists in the post-war period because of fear of the atom bomb) and posits that horror writers and directors tap into existing subconscious and societal fears, not the other way around. King wrote: "If horror movies have redeeming social merit, it is because of that ability to form liaisons between the real and unreal - to provide subtexts. And because of their mass appeal, these subtexts are often culture-wide." Jeff Smith, in Film Studies, says: "The value of these subtexts is that they endow popular fictions with a social and cultural significance that allows them to tap into the deeply held fears and anxieties of their readers. It is through these subtexts that the horror film has commented on a host of social and political issues, including scientism, racism, consumerism, conformism and, of course, Communism." Neil Hampshire (talk) 17:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Influence

message: I have a copy of the Berkley paperback edition but it is dated May 1982, well before the December 1983 edition mentioned. It does not have the "Forenote to the Paperback Edition" so is presumably the uncorrected text. Oddly the copyright page identifies the first edition as having been published in 1979, not 1981. 2604:3D09:1F74:1C00:C53C:7C0A:5AD8:BC94 (talk) 17:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Paperback publication date
Talk:God Is a DJ (Faithless song)

message: Hi, I've removed the primary author's email address from the article. Please not that we generally do not sign articles. For more on this topic, please see Wikipedia:Ownership of articles. Your contributions are recoreded in the page history, as required by the GFDL.
I also removed his email address. Unless you want to throw that address away, it is not a good idea to post it anywhere on this site. In addition to Wikipedia being one of the 100 most visited websites in the world, many mirrors of Wikipedia exist, so you are in effect posting your email address on thousands of pages when you put it up here. I don't like spam so much, and don't think you would like the ammount that would come in if your email address stayed for very long.
Gentgeen 04:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

message: :Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
*Weak Oppose - disambig pages should be used unless one is considerably better konwn than another, I think. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 01:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I wouldn't really class this as prog trance!! 188.222.74.71 (talk) JJ72UK  —Preceding undated comment added 17:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progressive Trance 
Talk:Struck jury

message: What differentiates this information from that in voir dire?  Could it be merged? Jesuschex 04:31, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it can be merged well, but certainly a reference to voir dire can be added here.  Voir dire is a part of the process of forming a jury, and it is used whether a struck jury is used or one of the alternatives is used.  So I've added the reference.  GRBerry 12:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Also there are many other circumstances in which a voir dire can/should be used. Metamagician3000 10:08, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voir dire 

message: At least two more sections are needed: United Kingdom and Major/Famous cases.  I know there is content for both sections but didn't get either written last night.  GRBerry 17:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A lead case for the famous cases - trial of John Peter Zenger in ~1736 GRBerry 22:22, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections Needed 
Talk:Splintercat

message: While I don't deny the existence of tall tales, this one seems to be a little bit too much to take even as fiction. Even so, its going to be difficult to verify given the seeming obscurity of the sources provided. Gershwinrb 04:37, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unclear if the cited sources actually contain relevant material, but they all exist. I've updated the sources per the Library of Congress catalog.  Would appreciate specific page cites where possible.  The "National Wildlife and Conservation Digest" is a serial, and needs a cite to a specific issue.  If the cites are actually fakes, please remove them. Thanks.  --John Nagle 06:23, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

text: Okay, after doing a Google Search, I retract my above statement about it being a hoax. I'd be inclined to keep this article since it appears to be a semi-well known tale, at least in the pacific northwest.Gershwinrb 04:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This, I think, would make it notable if it could be verified as true. Gershwinrb 04:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoax? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Mythologicalcreature8817 (talk) 03:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HUM 202 - Introduction to Mythology
Talk:Insolvency practitioner

message: This is an actual term defined in law - it is not necessarily the same as a Deed of Trust. I ahve therefore reverted it in the list to the former. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! (Whisper...) 04:43, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deed of arrangement v Trust Deeds
Talk:Crowns of Silla

message: I am having difficulties accessing the information about there being 10 "pure gold crowns" in the world, I can't seem to access any information that supports this.  The link to this quote doesn't show that information at all. I would like to know if anyone else can offer some insight into this supposed information, otherwise I believe it needs to be deletedICIWORLD (talk) 06:20, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

message: I hope someone put some info on the connection between the Crown of Silla and the 1st century Afghan golden crown. Komitsuki (talk) 14:43, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity with the 1st century Afghan golden crown? 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:서봉총 금관 금제드리개.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 14, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-07-14. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 05:53, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:서봉총 금관 금제드리개.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: and . Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources
Talk:Universe Today

message: Tha article claims that the forum of Universe Today allows "discussion" of against the mainstream ideas. This is not accurate. The fact is that the rules of the forum require against the mainstream ideas to be defended by the original poster by himself against any and everone who wishes to dispute, disparage, and dismiss. The moderation of the forum claims that "this is how science works", this is like a 'peer review', this is like defending your thesis before a college review board". This is not true. Legitimate peer boards are composed of experts in the subject matter and who make specific criticisms. Not just anyone in the world with a keyboard. 
98.164.98.44 (talk) 13:37, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is about discussion of the article, not critique of the website.--Canoe1967 (talk) 19:45, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual errors in article 

message: This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --197.208.195.201 (talk) 05:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page should not be speedy deleted because...  

message: Earlier versions of this article was clearly strongly oriented POV material from either related parties or Universe Today itself. It clearly violates WP:SPIP Although I have greatly modified it to have a neutral POV, this page still should be considered for deletion unless it can be proven it is not just existing for self-promotion. Anyone associated with this news website should carefully read Wikipedia:Autobiography before future editing. Arianewiki1 (talk) 16:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: An editor who cannot properly indent replies should not explain policies to others. Johnuniq (talk) 00:30, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: VLB. Thanks for the input. Just busy trying to satisfy to fix the content not really the niceties. Arianewiki1 (talk) 22:43, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious Issues with Neutrality
Talk:Tuck Everlasting

message: The plot as described here seems very vague, incomplete, and in need of addition.  In the article, the plot summary reads: 
This book is about a family that discovers a spring under the roots of a giant tree that gives the person who drinks it eternal life.
I think that this plot summary could be made more accurate and extensive.  In reading previous comments, could this summary have been put in place of a decent summary because it had a spoiler?  Really, anybody who reads a book synopsis should understand that it will include the ending.
I quote from WP:SW, a page on spoilers and how they should be handled:
It is not acceptable to delete information from an article because you think it spoils the plot.
and I also quote from WP:SW
Articles on the Internet sometimes feature a "spoiler warning" to alert readers to spoilers in the text, which they may then choose to avoid reading. Wikipedia has previously included such warnings in some articles on works of fiction. However, since it is generally expected that the subjects of our articles will be covered in detail, such warnings are considered unnecessary. Therefore, Wikipedia no longer carries spoiler warnings, except for the content disclaimer and section headings (such as "Plot" or "Ending") which imply the presence of spoilers.
Again, read Wikipedia:Spoiler, and remember Wikipedia regulations. The vast majority of article change suggestions that aren't considered necessary are easily resolved by looking at the already set-in-stone Wikipedia regulations.  Look at them, they really sum up the point of Wikipedia as an ongoing project and collaboration of millions of editors, admins, and normal people who just want to contribute to where they are expert in.
ojay123 (talk) 00:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers and Summaries 

message: ive just watched the movie in english class 
in the movie she dies at 100
in the book she dies the day before she decides to drink the water thats not truw —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buddy123a (talk • contribs) 00:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  thats not entirely accurate 

message: And if, to which languages? Iivarius (talk) 21:07, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has the book been translated?
Talk:Long Bay Correctional Centre

message: For anyone that is interested.--Ad@m.J.W.C. 12:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Long bay user boxes
Talk:2003 Alabama earthquake

message: Nice article but in California these happen all the time. What's notable about this earthquake?
:"It was the strongest eartquake ever to occur in the Eastern Tennessee Seismic Zone " If we were in California, maybe not, but in Alabama? It's very notable. JodyB 22:08, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  So what's notable about this earthquake 

message: The GSA page states this earthquake was the largest in the Eastern Tennessee Seismc Zone, but the USGS poster states that the largest was a 1973 4.6 earthquake near Knoxville. The GSA page also gives a magnitude of 4.9 for the 2003 earthquake which disagrees with the 4.6 given by the USGS references. For now I've left it that both the 1973 Knoxville and 2003 Ft. Payne earthquakes share the "biggest" title at the USGS numbers of 4.6. Other thoughts, analysis, references to point one way or the other? Thanks. Civilengtiger (talk) 18:10, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Largest earthquake

message: I have removed the Proposed Deletion tag in accordance with the process described in WP:DP Item 3.3 Proposed deletion > If you disagree. The article was proposed for deletion under WP:NOT#NEWS. A review of these criteria does not seem to support deletion. Items that may be excluded such as “Routine news coverage of such things as announcements, sports, and tabloid journalism” do not apply, nor does the report form the basis for any biography of a living person. The editor proposing deletion correctly stated the following regarding the event: Minor earthquake, no deaths or injuries, minor damages. Though “minor” in comparison with the overall world wide spectrum of earthquakes, the earthquake was quite significant and notable for its location. I wholeheartedly agree that such an earthquake would not be notable for southern California, elsewhere in the Pacific Rim or other areas of high seismic activity. However, given its occurrence in an area not commonly thought of as earthquake-prone, the resulting public reaction, wide media coverage, and professional geological publications results in the earthquake clearly meeting the five criteria of WP:NOTE > General notability guideline. Therefore I disagree with the proposed deletion.
I appreciate editor User:Jklamo bringing attention to this article and forcing an objective review of areas where the article can be improved. Thank you. Civilengtiger (talk) 18:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Deletion
Talk:PS Lady Elgin

message: The last line in the article says that the Lady Elgin was named after a town in Oregon but there is no citation given for this statement.  The Lady Elgin was actually named after the wife of Lord Elgin, Canada's Governor-General from 1847 - 1854.  See the citation added to the article.  --Wpwatchdog (talk) 00:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the statement in question. It was probably just juvenile level vandalism.Shinerunner (talk) 12:56, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:   It sure didn't make sense in the article.  Thank you.  --Wpwatchdog (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Lady Elgin's'' namesake

message: According to WP:LEADCITE, redundant citations in the lead are balanced by the need to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material.  I added the citation to the lead that is already in the article per Sift&Winnow's recommendation.  --Wpwatchdog (talk) 23:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation for lead

message: "Augusta was sailing using only a single white light, mounted on a five-foot Samson on the bow". What is a Samson in this context? Could it be an error for sponson? Tigerboy1966  11:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Samson?

message: So is it truly a mere coincidence that the PS Lady Elgin was hit by another ship (which abandoned the Lady Elgin) and that the Lady Elgin sinking was also allegedly tied to the balance change from "Irish" to "German" political power in Milwaukee? Is it coincidence or was it possible political espionage? Just a connection I thought of while doing research. RaptorGirl97 (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coincidence?
Talk:Silverwater Correctional Complex

message: I propose that Metropolitan Remand and Reception Centre (MRRC) and Silverwater Women's Correctional Centre (SWCC) be merged into Silverwater Correctional Complex (SCC). I think that the content in the MRRC and SWCC articles can easily be explained in the context of the SCC, and that the two articles are of a reasonable size that the merging will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Rangasyd (talk) 05:59, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm on the fence about it. There're still four facilities, albeit co-located, and while they fit reasonably into the one article, the article length (especially with a full merge) is getting to the point where a summary style breakout would be required with any expansion. I'd at a minimum want to ensure that none of the content in the current articles was lost in a merging into the larger one. The Drover's Wife (talk) 07:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm proposing that the enitre content on each of the two facilities that have pages (the other two don't) be merged in full into the Complex page. I don't believe that the Complex page is getting too long. It's layout could improved a little. Of course, if we retained the status quo, that would then lend itself to establishing pages for the Silverwater Correctional Centre and the Dawn de Loas Correctional Centre. Given the whole Complex's general lack of notability, in relative terms, when people refer to "Silverwater gaol", they just think of one complex, not four centres. Rangasyd (talk) 09:05, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

text: Merge: I agree with Rangasyd that the complex is commonly recognised as one entity, "Silverwater gaol". Keeping a separate section for the Women's Correctional Centre, ensuring that its a full-content merge, doesn't lead to a loss of distinct identitity nor prevent future expansion. Klbrain (talk) 10:05, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:   Merger proposal  
Talk:Richard Greenblatt (programmer)

message: There were hackers at the MIT AI Lab noted for a "lack of personal hygiene".  Greenblatt was not one of them.  I consider that claim in this article to be spurious and should be removed.
Maybe so, but this lack actually have a source, namely Levy's book. If you have some other information, feel free to put it forward and expand the article. It is a wiki after all and everyone can edit. Best of all would of course be if Greenblatt himself would like to correct it. 
There's some really nice stuff in the Computer Museum Oral History I cited in my edit, but I completely lack the interest level necessary to put it into the various entries it applies to. (The quality of CHM's transcript is atrocious, and it's sort of a fun game to figure out, by reading the transcript before you watch the video, what he's talking about. I particularly like the "DEC" acronym being transcribed as "Deck".)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by T.a.adjuster (talk • contribs) 00:33, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What is Greenblatt doing these days? No information seems to be forthcoming beyond the 1980s. Old Man of Storr (talk) 20:20, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Where is he now?
Talk:Sydney United 58 FC

message: This page needs a definite cleanup.
*The Sydney United history only goes till 95-96 and that really should be done in table format. 
Also there should be a list for players that have played for Sydney United in the past.
--Mato-Bateman 06:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ANDREW HENDERSON

message: Why are so many Australian players given Croatian flags in their position on the squad list? Milan Bosnar, Luka Glavas and Ben Vidaic have all been given Croatian flags despite all three being born in Sydney and having played in Australia their entire lives. Ben Vidaic has even made appearances for Australian youth teams and none of them have any international caps for Croatia so their default should be Australian. Is there any actual reason why these players have incorrect flags? Macktheknifeau (talk) 04:11, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's supposed to be based on FIFA eligibility. If a player has played international football, the flag should be the last country they represented. Bear in mind players born after 1986 may not necessarily be Australian citizens. Hack (talk) 04:25, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Croatian Flags in Squad List