lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Pioneer Square, Seattle

message: While I'm not usually an deleter, I have removed the the following uncited statement because it seems far too tangentinal for the introductory paragraph:
:Pioneer Square has a space in the Here & Now edition of Monopoly by Hasbro.
Alki 04:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Board game reference removed 

message: Do we really need such a large locator map? It seems to take up an amount of space disproportionate to the information it provides. - Jmabel | Talk 08:31, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maps 

message: Someone who is knowledgeable about the subject should add a section on the importance of Pioneer Square in Seattle's GLBT history.  The importance of Seattle as a site of Gay bars and clubs is partly discussed in Gary Atkins' book, Gay Seattle: Stories of Exile and Belonging, published in 2003.Chesterct (talk) 03:34, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Gay Seattle?

message: Should we fork out a separate article for Pioneer Place Park? ---Another Believer (Talk) 05:21, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think the park itself is notable or has enough information for a substantial article. The totem pole and pergola are, along with the adjacent Pioneer Building. SounderBruce 05:31, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

text: I'm not even sure Pioneer Place exists anymore on paper, since it was absorbed into the creatively named Pioneer Square in 1971. SounderBruce 06:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pioneer Place Park? 

message: I've built a Commons gallery page specific to the Square and park (as against the larger neighborhood): :commons:Pioneer Square Park. Is there some reasonable way to link that from here? I think it's pretty interesting, especially for the enormous number of high-res scans from the late 19th and early 20th century. - Jmabel | Talk 05:52, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commons gallery page
Talk:John M. Duhé Jr.

message: This short article should be deleted, as there is a longer article on this former judge entitled John M. Duhe.
:I didn't think I had made the mistake of creating an article that already existed.  I checked the histories.  I created this article first.  The other Duhe article should be merged with this one.  Chicken Wing 16:34, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Virelai

message: ABBA is a rhyme scheme; not a musical structure. I believe the author means a quatrain would correspond to 8 measures with some regularity, such as indicated by the performance of the example poem on YouTube (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2Pb_jpSyiE - the second half has the lyrics) However, in the tercets, the AABAAB rhyme structures as shown in the example
    Qu'adès sans tricherie
    Chierie
    Vous ay et humblement
    Tous les jours de ma vie
    Servie
    Sans villain pensement.
are sung in the same performance on varying measures of up to 9 in a round. This indicates invariably is an overstatement for the middle stanzas, while the first and last adhere to the 4 lines for eight measures arrangement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forestwhite (talk • contribs) 06:21, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Confession (1970 film)

message: Starring Yves Montand as "Arthur London", which, by the way, is spelled "Artur London" (without the "h"), how can it be "about Anton Ludvik, alias Gerard"?? Come on, focus!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.105.229.54 (talk) 17:10, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency
Talk:Feminine rhyme

message: The result was keep. -- Metzby (talk) 04:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Metzby. How about ditching the tag? There clearly isn't a concensus to merge. -Phoenixrod (talk) 19:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: I think there is a difference between feminine rhymes and multi-syllabic rhymes. Feminine rhymes are still merely one word, e.g. rhyming "measure" with "pleasure". That's a feminine rhyme, not a multi-syllabic rhyme. Generally with a feminine rhyme, the first syllable of each word rhymes, and the second syllable is actually the same as the second syllable on the other word. Multi-syllabic rhymes are different in how they generally incorporate several words into the rhyme scheme. If this is not the case and only one word is present, then all syllables of that word rhyme with their respectives, not merely the first syllable. Gwame (talk) 16:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Difference 

message: The term has the same meaning re English or Latin poetry. I can't recall if there is more than one example in Orff's selections from the Carmina Burana; perhaps someone else will find it handy to check, before i can. --Jerzy•t 12:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latin feminine rhymes 

message: I'm really not up for integrating this, but I think it's a very interesting one to point out: in Poe's "The Raven", there's only one masculine rhyme (door/Lenore/nevermore, etc. throughout the poem). All of the many other rhymes in the poem (some internal rhymes, some at the ends of lines) are feminine: napping/tapping/rapping, morrow/borrow/sorrow, shutter/flutter, etc. Surely one of the sources in the article for the Raven mentions it. ;)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.176.216.173 (talk) 06:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Raven 

message: The un-sourced definition given here contradicts the definition found most everywhere else, which is that a feminine rhyme is a rhyme where the accent is on the penultimate syllable of each rhymed word. Any disagreement? Bongomatic 16:39, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accuracy
Talk:Alexander of Jerusalem

message: The fragment of the Origen's Letter to Alexander of Jerusalem, as described by the EUsebius’Ecclesiastic History (VI 19, 12-4) "narrates that he frequented for a while a philosophical school, meeting there Heraclas, who subsequently would become his assistant at the didaskaleion and later on, as bishop of Alexandria, his staunch enemy." He also names Pantaenus as the model for his own behaviour, without any form of concern to his nearer predecessor, Clement of Alexandria. 
I think that Letter must be cited since it ignored the man who was probably one of the main moral models of Alexander of Jerusalem,Clement of Alexandria. While Alban Butler says that Origen and Alexander had studied together in the great Christian school of Alexandria, one of the fewest and very rare autobiographical texts we have about Origen mentions uniquely a not well known Heraclas as his companion of studies and Pantaenus "as the model for his own behaviour". For thise reasons, I think the paper commenting the letter has to be integrated into the article.
The related source is given by academia.edu, L. Perrone Origen’s “Confessions”: Recovering the Traces of a Self-Portrait, STUDIA PATRISTICA VOL. LVI,Volume 4: Rediscovering Origen, Peeters Publishers, 2011, p. 8.
Any comment will be kindly appreciated.Micheledisaveriosp (talk) 00:13, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Origen's ''Letter to Alexander of Jerusalem''
Talk:Finn Family Moomintroll

message: At one point a "dictionary of outlandish words" is placed on the hobgoblins hat, the words come alive and start crawling around like insects. This seems to me to be a case of etymology becoming entomology, but was this pun intentional? Does this even work as a pun in Finnish?Pignut 08:22, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that Tove Jansson wrote in Swedish, not Finnish. Anyway, it could work in both languages: Swedish: etymologi & entomologi (or insektologi); Finnish: etymologia & entomologia. --Jonik (talk) 20:22, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

text: I've always assumed the translators must have been influenced by that title, though I can't think why – the intertextuality it creates isn't remotely relevant. I doubt there's any definite evidence of their motives. David Arthur (talk) 20:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The curent version of this article says that this book was published in english i 1961. That must be wrong, for several reasons. First because it was to first moomin book to be translated into english. Second because it caused British Associated Newspapers to contact Jansson in 1952 to make an agreement about the Moomin comic strips. And finally because Boel Westin's authoritative biography Tove Jansson, ord, bild, liv (2007) says that Trollkarlens hatt was published in UK as Finn Family Moomintroll in 1950, and in US as The happy Moomins in 1951. I'm changing this now, adding the reference. Bw Orland (talk) 16:33, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The Tove Jansson wiki page shows the cover of the Puffin paperback edition of Finn Family Moomintroll (in English), dated 1948. But this date might be wrong. Valetude (talk) 18:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translated in 1950 

message: The illustrations in this volume are the only ones by the author. The others books were illustrated in the same style, but by someone else. I think this needs logging. Valetude (talk) 00:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illustrations 
Talk:Jeu parti

message: Is not Jeu parti same as Partimen? Goregore (talk) 00:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to article text, I think they are the same and articles should be merged. This is causing iw conflicts, too.--Pere prlpz (talk) 13:13, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeu parti and Partimen
Talk:Firebirds (anthology)

message: firbirds is a stupid book about dumb birds on fire and im tired of it .. and wtf is the author huh? what is the point on having 10 authors for 1 book how am i going to do my book report now?! - A pissed of student  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.166.57.94 (talk) 13:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an anthology of short stories, not a full-length novel. It says so on the cover. And, um, the stories are not actually about firebirds. I'm sure if you googled "anthology book report" or something similar you could find a helpful website. --Masamage ♫ 17:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

message: While the sequels (Rising, Soaring) seem to have generated some reception (academic reviews, which I added as refs) I am having trouble finding information that the first book (which right now is the only one to have an entry on Wikipedia) meets WP:NBOOK... A possible solution would be to discuss all three anthologies in one article about them as a connected series. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:31, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:The Bird with the Crystal Plumage

message: *The POV shot used when Alberto Ranieri falls to his death was achieved by actually dropping a camera six stories onto a concrete sidewalk. The camera did indeed break, but the footage was saved.  (NOTE:  Highly doubtful, given the budget of the movie and the nascency of the director.  Furthermore, the camera visibly jerks backward at the very end of the shot, heavily suggesting that it was attached to some sort of bungie cord.  At the very least, all of these need citations.)
Above moved here from main article. Format (talk) 08:13, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion moved from main article

message: This article is missing information on the film's production. This should be added to the article in order to completely cover the scope of the film.--Paleface Jack (talk) 22:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Production Information
Talk:First Among Sequels

message: Uhm, the plot summary is entirely lifted from Fforde's site. That's probably not OK. 83.100.165.174 19:39, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As per the edit history, the plot summary was provided to the editor by Jasper Fforde himself, so it probably is OK ;) Carre 10:19, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary 

message: I am pretty sure the plot summary is lifted from the back of an American edition of the novel. Copying this is against Wikipedia rules. I would delete it but as indicated, I am not fully sure if it is a copy. Lots42 (talk) 21:26, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Again Plot Summary 

message: The description of Jenny Next in the character section contains a major plot point.  I know that by WP:Spoiler we don't exclude plot information, but one of the reasons for that is that the information is usually included in a clearly marked Plot section.  This detail is in the Characters section.  I'd suggest moving it to the Plot section, except that section is quite brief.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliljeho (talk • contribs) 19:10, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jenny Next spoiler? 
Talk:First Apocalypse of James

message: Regarding the sentence: "One of the most curious features of the First Apocalypse of James is that the range of dating of its original text, assigned to it by scholars, requires that it was written after the Second Apocalypse of James."
That sentence was added to the article in an edit performed at 12:18, 11 June 2005. The text of the First Apocalypse of James to which the sentence refers is the text of the Nag Hammadi Coptic manuscript. Thankfully, somebody has tagged the subject sentence with a "citation needed" tag. If nobody comes up with a citation, the sentence should be deleted. Mksword (talk) 21:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence about dates of original texts may be unsupported
Talk:NBA Jam Tournament Edition

message: This article calls the game fun.
I didn't know 'funness' was an establishable fact.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.210.30.41 (talk • contribs) 
:The fun remark has been reworded to what the remark was meant to be. Salisbury Steak (complaint dept. - contribs) 20:19, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fun
Talk:First Law

message: should the "first law" refer to the first law of thermodynamics, rather than a fictional law regarding robots?
Elpha 13:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I'm removing the sections that claim this as an inconsistency with the rest of the Foundation universe. Johnny Pez 00:21, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambugation page?
Talk:Thomas Oldham

message: Oldham donated a large collection of flints to the collection of the Royal Society of Ireland. This is noted in the catalogue (http://www.archive.org/details/adescriptivecat01wildgoog) on page 9. Worth adding? PatHadley (talk) 12:33, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flint donations 
Talk:First They Killed My Father

message: The grammar in Summary is quite bad and the text is hard to read. I assume it has been taken from the backside of the book's cover.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.51.137.115 (talk) 09:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar
Talk:Firstborn (Clarke and Baxter novel)

message: When this page acquires a plot summary, the correct link for the first mayor of post-Discontinuity Chicago is Edmund Rice (general) - who did indeed command the Columbian Guard at the 1893 World's Fair. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:45, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rice

message: So I'm guessing in this little universe, a whole lot of different things from completely different time periods collide? Could someone maybe make that clear in the article? Hpelgrift (talk) 07:51, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot Summary
Talk:Carry On Loving

message: I don't think the Peter Butterworth character is called 'Dr Crippen'. Sid Bliss may refer to him as such, but I think it's more a reference to his activities rather than his name.
On IMDB he's just down as 'Sinister Client'
I really must get out more.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.152.3.106 (talk) 08:25, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peter Butterworth
Talk:Flowers for Hitler

message: N. Vesselova writes: The last element of the prefatory complex is an epigraph in the exact sense of the word, a quotation from Primo Levi’s memoir If This is a Man (Se questo è un uomo, 1947; also known as Survival in Auschwitz): "If from the inside of the Lager, a message could have seeped out to free men, it would have been this: Take care not to suffer in your own homes what is inflicted on us here."Vesselova, N., “The Past is Perfect”: Leonard Cohen’s Philosophy of Time (PhD thesis, University of Ottawa, 2014).
—Judgtastic (talk) 13:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening quote 
Talk:Mormonism Unvailed

message: If it's an exposé, why isn't it called UNVEILED?  UNVAILED is not a word!Proofreader J-Man 04:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct, and I believe that Howe intended to call it exactly that: "Mormonism Unveiled." One of the great mysteries is why Howe misspelled the title of his book...but it is indeed titled "Mormonism Unvailed." No doubt it will cause Wikipedia proofreaders some grief... :-) Bochica 04:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

text: No mystery here - at that time spelling was much less standardized than it is now. Senor Cuete (talk) 20:41, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

text: The [sic] should probably be removed. Senor Cuete (talk) 14:34, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: 1 February 2007

message: How is this not just another article to list criticisms of Smith and the LDS church? There is little to nothing in this article about the book. It's all about the contents and it gives yet another platform to produce criticism of the LDS church. Shouldn't this article be about the book? where it was published? How it was published? why is the name misspelled? Anything? Padillah (talk) 17:28, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: And what the heck is "Use of the Howe/Hurlbut affidavits in modern works" doing in this article? What does this section have to do with the book under review? This is pretty blatant WP:SOAPBOXing. Padillah (talk) 15:45, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism of Smith and LDS movement 

message: Is it Manchester USA or UK?Fletcherbrian (talk) 13:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Fletcherbrian. I've given it a link. Manchester in New York - near Palmyra. Dougweller (talk) 05:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Manchester? 

message: There is not enough material specifically about the Hurlbut affidavits, separate & distinct from the Mormonism Unvailed work itself, to merit a separate article. The material currently at Hurlbut affidavits should be merged into this article, and that article then redirected here.  —Asterisk*Splat→ 00:53, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Tripleahg (talk) 10:14, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

text: Agreed. TuckerResearch (talk) 17:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Hurlbut affidavits

message: This section is not part of Mormonism Unvailed. What it says is WP:WEASELWORDS and the citation is not to a reference that discusses this. I removed it. Senor Cuete (talk) 16:23, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Resurgence of the Spalding theory
Talk:Flyboys: A True Story of Courage

message: This book is what turned me off firebombing, and area bombing, and capital punishment, and corporal punishment.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marine7 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firebombing 

message: Dr. Tedaki was not executed as he was threatened and beaten until he was forced to take part in the atrocity. The mental trauma he recieved was so severe that he lived in fear and suffered PTSD until his early death. He was later released within 8 months due to his mental instability and because he was only forced by his superiors to take part.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woo1693 (talk • contribs) 01:16, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article error
Talk:Bionicle/Archive 2

message: Well, this has gone way bad!  It is all wrong!  I think we should just forget it, calm down, and just leave peacefully, before it gets more serious.  Let InShaneee win, can't stop him, no point in fighting.  Dark Jedi retires from the Bionicle descussion, and it would be wise to follow.
I agree, wise descision, Toa of Sound out. Toa of Sound retires from the Bionicle descussion, and it would be wise to follow. 
I agree, but I will remain on top of what is going on on this page.  I will be back once and a while.-Jedizati 12:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please restrict your comments here to discussion of article content. This is not a message board; if you wish to leave, there is no need to announce it. --InShaneee 18:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This has gone to far! 

message: It looks like the Bionicle External Links dispute has come to a halt, good.  If you have any problems with the way things r now, don't.  I think it is now good the way it is.-Jedizati 20:11, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That was wild. Like, the whole discussion. I'm very glad it's over. –BoMEpsilontalk 16:42, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I really hope it is, though it may not be as there may be some people with more points, but I think it is sorted out now fairly and I doubt there is anything else anyone can say, though I would like on final reply to my previous post. --Tortuga Turaga 20:16, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is it over?
Talk:Stanislas de Guaita

message: I think there are some things that should be corrected: 
* the article says "In the 1880s, Guaita published two collections of poetry The Dark Muse (1883) and The Mystic Rose (1885), which became popular." That's not what I read in several biographies, according to which his career as a poet had a difficult start, which was a reason for turning towards another field. 
* His books (the bibiliography should be added) can hardly be described as "novels", they are essays on history, religion and metaphysics.
* The last sentence about 17th century and "real" rosicrucians has nothing to do with the article's topic. --83.180.71.53 09:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Glenwood High School (Illinois)

message: Seriously...the previous version with the speech team under history was "extraordinarily and insightfully" unobjective.  Give me a break people...  Bwhitehurst81 06:30, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You did a great job.  The paragraph before your edits might need to be tweaked a little, for a better flow.  --Spiffy sperry 14:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Forced Exposure

message: FE was published on letter stock, not newsprint, until issue 7 or 8, I believe.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.48.116.132 (talk) 01:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)