lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft

message: I've started a discussion on the use of David Irving's The Rise and Fall of the Luftwaffe  in the Dornier Do 19 and Junkers Ju 89 articles at WP:RSN - here.Nigel Ish (talk) 18:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of David Irving as a source 

message: I was thinking of splitting the list of Piper Aircraft from the Piper Aircraft article so that it is identical to Beechcraft and Cessna, which have separate articles for their aircraft. (All three lists are roughly the same size, so even without the the "Big 3" comparison it seems they should be treated the same way.) However, I realized maybe it was better to instead merge the Beechcraft and Cessna lists back into their respective articles. What do you guys think? The one benefit I have found for separate articles is that it allows the aircraft/products section in the main article to focus on only the aircraft the company is currently producing. However, I don't know whether this is a distinction worth preserving. –Noha307 (talk) 20:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see much of a benefit to merging the lists to their respective articles.  Especially in the case of Beechcraft, where the list of aircraft models is longer than the company's article itself, it would, in my opinion, result in a disproportionally large chunk of the article being a list of the company's aircraft rather than the company's history. - ZLEA T\C 00:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Piper Aircraft
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft/Archive 3

message: I recently happened upon this one and converted it to the inline standard in passing... and I saw today that not only has it been reverted to the old table format, but this has occured in a most bizarre fashion. A user seems to have taken a screenshot of the old table and inserted it as an image on the right side of the article, shoving everything all over the place and causing a lower image to overlap a bunch of text. I've reverted it back to the current format and removed the NOTOC tag so that perhaps it's easier to tell that specs weren't just removed.
-eric 18:47, Oct 12, 2004 (UTC)
:Errr.... weird :) --Rlandmann 22:19, 12 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: [[X-20 Dyna-Soar]]

message: Hi, 
I'm new here and hope you guys (girls) can provide some direction/guidence.
In writing one of my pages, I had linked to the Cessna AT-17 and found out it didn't exist.  So for me the next logical thing to do was create an AT-17 page.
Well, hmm.. what to have the main page called?  I researched the plane and found Cessna  produced its first T-50 light transport for the civil market in 1939.  The U.S. Army Air Corps purchased they type as the AT-8 Bobcat as an multi-engine advanced trainer. With an engine change, the Bobcat was then redesignated the AT-17.  In 1942, the U.S. Army Air Force started using the Bobcat as a light personal transport and changed the designation to UC-78.  
So... multiple engines, the body was modified on some models, varying roles.
Do I make the main page Cessna T-50 since that is the original designator.  Or as most planes do, do I use the most common designation the Cessna AT-17?  Or....do I create a few different pages :)  
Thanks!
(oh..take a look at my first try at an aircraft page Curtiss AT-9)
Mikeb 18:00, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm no authority, but I think you'd want to use the original variant as the main article - after all, it is the basis for the other developments - and provide redirects from the other names and designations. -eric 20:01, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
Most of the time, the name for the article should be clear-cut, but this is one example where it's not, and where there's two conflicting principles - to name as generally as possible (Cessna T-50), and to use the most familiar names for things (Cessna AT-17). You'll have to use your judgement here! --Rlandmann 21:47, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple use planes ?  Which info to include? 

message: The aircraft category system is currently under debate on Wikipedia:Categories for deletion (you'll find it under the "US vs U.S." heading). Comments are invited. --Rlandmann 06:09, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Consensus was to change "US" to "U.S." -- Beland 02:46, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories
Talk:The Secret Life of Bees (novel)

message: ==
**she stays with the sisters Airline 03:14, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

message: I read in a newspaper that the book has been optioned as a movie. Does anyone have more information on this?
Yeah, sure... here
Dakota Fanning will be playing Lily, Fox Studios has taken on the harrowing task of transforming this "strong-woman-fights-her-way-out-of-some-circumstance-while-gaining-insight-and-growing-emotionally-while-developing-a-forbidden-love-interest" cliche of a book into a profitable movie
Someone was saying this was over saturated with "symbolism" yet I find that it was undersaturated, it was a great book. The reviews were great, and the story was overall just wonderful. I found nothing wrong with it.
book is amazing  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.219.149.127 (talk) 15:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Movie

message: There's this great study guide made by Year 10 Australian students for this book. 
-- can be found at []
includes: 
Introduction, Themes, Summary of the plot, Key turning points, Author information, Quotes, page references, Characters, Settings, Historical context, Chapter summaries, Structure, Symbols, Practice Essay Questions --Msmarmalade (talk) 08:49, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Study guide for students 

message: Observation: The infobox currently says the book was published in January 2003, while the main article says 2002. --DocumentN (talk) 05:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication date 

message: I don't have the time or inclination to fix it, but this article, or at least the plot summary, was (quite hilariously) clearly written by an eight year old. Might want to go through and edit it. GRHooked (talk) 03:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of Writing
Talk:Car Wash (song)

message: This article needs to be rewritten so that it covers both versions of the song. Disreguarding one or the other violates our neutral point of view policy, and makes the article factually innacurate. --FuriousFreddy 02:27, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there needs to be another version for the other version of the song, but keep this the way it is. OmegaWikipedia 03:08, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It has been proposed that Car wash be renamed and moved to Car wash (business) so that Car wash (disambiguation) can be moved to Car wash.  Please discuss at Talk:Car wash.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  15:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 
Talk:Adoxography

message: I remvoed this from the article:
Or, according to the Hutchinson Encyclopedia: "n. Literature, fine writing on [a] trivial or base subject."
I'm not convinced we can use that large a quote under fair use (unless its copyright has expired which isn't stated).  I left the quote from the wall street journal in there and added my own definition. RJFJR 02:32, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote
Talk:Miri Ben-Ari

message: what other tracks has miri ben ari played violin on? --Shawn88 02:41, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  what other... 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.miribenari.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2&Itemid=2. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 20:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I emailed the person who was attempting to add the text - turned out to be a VP of Miri's management company. Tabercil (talk) 04:07, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: if she was born in 1978, she would've been 15 in 1993.
she couldn't have completed her IDF service before the age of 15.
one of these years is incorrect, or the statement that she did her service before 93 is incorrect.
on the other hand, being in college at 15 is not that unbelievable for someone with talent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.201.17.148 (talk) 02:24, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  age 

message: Is Miri Ben-Ari related to Israeli far-right politician Michael Ben-Ari (National Union)?
Wandering Courier (talk) 04:39, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to Michael Ben-Ari 

message: I removed the following sentence in the paragraph about this song: "It became the first instrumental single ever to hit Billboard R&B/hip-hop charts, where it reached number 2."
This is simply incorrect. "Grazing in the Grass" by Hugh Masekela and "Outa-Space" and "Space Race" by Billy Preston, all of which are instrumentals with no vocals at all, all hit #1 on that chart before Ben-Ari was born. Furthermore, as indicated later in this article, "Symphony of Brotherhood" only hit #77 on the Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Songs chart. The chart it hit #2 on was Hot R&B/Hip-Hop Singles Sales, which is a component of the main R&B chart. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:32, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Symphony of Brotherhood"
Talk:Beating retreat

message: The article doesn't actually describe what goes on in the ceremony.  Also, a bit more on its historical origins wrt the rest of Europe (day's end ceremonies are by no means unique to the UK) could be useful. Grosser Zapfenstreich and so on are all essentially the same with a few pieces of music, some kind of formal signal and/or hymn part etc., i.e. it is nothing more than a form of tattoo (though you'll need sources :D) 118.90.35.155 (talk) 13:18, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Form of the ceremony 
Template talk:Testb

message: This is a mirror of Template:Test-b.  I refer you to the discussion page for the history of the template.  Psy guy (talk) 02:45, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure about the happy face addition to the template.  I think it may take away from the message and diminish some of the professional nature and seriousness of the template.  However, it does serve to contribute to the polite nature of the test.  That does seem to be the point of the first test: assume good faith, be polite, don't bite newbies and other wiki-ideas.  Because of the conflict, I am not going to remove it, but I would like to here input from others.  Does anyone have anything to add? -- Psy guy (talk) 18:45, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Pat Travers

message: Hahaha! it actually says he's playing "with the great drummer" That isn't much objective, is it? :PGumdropster 17:44, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drummer :P 

message: As the above comment so succinctly puts it, "Eh?"Does the comment "The same like Boom Boom" mean that those albums were reissues of the earlier album? Could someone who both speaks English and has a handle on the track listings for those albums have a go at tidying it up?  Dom Kaos (talk) 14:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: I think this could be Mick DycheCaptain McVitie (talk) 17:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 1977 - second guitarist 

message: I do not believe Micheal Shrieve was the drummer on Crash and Burn. I'm pretty sure it was Tommy Aldridge.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.160.18.195 (talk) 01:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong drummer for Crash and Burn 

message: Blues Album 2 ? 50.49.159.36 (talk) 14:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Singer of Red Skies
Wikipedia talk:Mid-term filling of open ArbCom positions

message: I remember reading the Wikipedia Signpost recently, discussing the mid-term resignations of members of the Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee.  It noted that there was no firm policy in place with regards to replacing them, and that nobody knew what to do.  I also thought about Delirium, who stated their intention to resign when such a policy was in place.  The goal of this page is to discuss this problem, and the course of action we should take to correct it.  Naturally, the first question is: 'what is to be done?'  To this question, I think all of us will answer 'we must set up a written policy.'  Thus, we move on to the next question: 'what kind of policy should we have?'  Some possibilities:
# Jimbo appoints a replacement.
#* Advantage: quick response time (probably 3-5 days).
#* Disadvantage: puts the replacement in the hands of just one man.  There's a reason why we hold elections for the ArbCom.
# The remaining Arbitrator select someone to be a replacement.
#* Advantage: process doesn't revolve around one person, but still pretty quick (probably 3-7 days).
#* Disadvantage: oligarchical process without much community involvement.  Again, Arbitrators are elected for a reason.
# Appoint the runner-up in the most recent election.
#* Advantage: theoretically instantaneous, and the appointed Arbitrator has demonstrated support from the community.
#* Disadvantage: the base of community support may have disappeared.  Also, they may have left the project or been disgraced in some way.
# Jimbo appoints a replacement, but gets official input from the community.
#* Advantage: probably won't slow the process much, but allows the community to voice its opinion.
#* Disadvantage: it's still Jimbo's decision.
# ArbCom appoints a replacement, but gets official input from the community.
#* Advantage: probably won't slow the process much, but allows the community to voice its opinion.
#* Disadvantage: it's still the ArbCom's decision.
# New Arbitrator is elected directly in a special election.
#* Advantage: community voices its opinion directly.
#* Disadvantage: potentially time consuming.
Please not that I am not advocating any particular one of these systems; I'm just throwing them out for y'all to think over.  If you have any other ideas, please post them.  Also, please note that ideas that garner no support will probably not be considered as options for the final policy.
Some other points to think about:
* What should be the standard for the ratification of a new Arbitrator by the ArbCom?
* What process should be used in the special election for the new Arbitrator?
* How will we decide which policy is the final one?
Please add a new discussion heading when the next comment is posted.  Thanks, Ingoolemo talk 02:47, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Paramount Airlines

message: Suggest moving this page to Paramount Airways as that is the actual name of the airline. I have moved the content to that page. This page only really needs to be replaced with a redirect. I thought it bbest to leave it here for a few days to allow people to update their watchlists. -- Adz 07:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose Paramount Airways is an article about an airline in India.  This is an article about an airline in Sierra Leone.  If the name is wrong, the appropriate action would be to move the article to Paramount Airways (Sierra Leone).  --Lineagegeek (talk) 15:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: After this page is moved, the fleet info should be updated. The article says that there are 3xEMB175 and 5xEMB170s in the fleet. According to the November 2005 edition of Airliner World Magazine, there was an order placed for a total of 5 aircraft, the first of which was delivered in September 2005. At most there would be five aircraft in the fleet (although not all would have been delivered yet), not eight as the article suggests.  -- Adz 07:05, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fleet info
Talk:Malinche (volcano)

message: The height of Mexican mountains varies quite a bit depending on the source of the information. It seems pretty clear that the Sierra Negra is higher than Matlalcueitl, however, which would make it sixth-highest at most (Pico de Orizaba, Popo, Ixta, Sierra N?/ Nevado de Toluca?, Matlalcueitl. The fact that the Sierra Negra isn't mentioned at all on most lists would give Matlalcueitl 5th place on those lists.
--Lavintzin 03:02, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 

message: The article mentions the mountain's summit being covered with snow. I have been to the summit in July and there was no snow. Perhaps it should be changed to "snow during some of the year" ?
209.98.36.253 (talk) 16:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snow 

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* According to Google Maps, the coordinates given are not even on the slope of the mountain. The actuals are a bit hard to get, since it's unclear where the summit lies exactly, but they should be somewhere close to 19.230535, -98.032465. La Malinche is a very prominent feature on the map (a bright white spot surrounded by a deep green "circle", surrounded by a network of human civilization).
69.106.248.219 (talk) 13:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinates
Talk:Geel

message: I added the St. Dymphna info, though kept it very brief. For more info there's the 1911 Encyclpædia Brittanica Geel article, and the Saint Dymphna article. I'm thinking out loud here, but does anyone know the history of the name? I'm probably really off base, but I can't help thinking it sounds a lot like 'Gael' Khirad 03:05, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: I

message: The second paragraph appears to have been plagiarized, in places word-for-word, from Comer, R. J. (2007). Abnormal psychology (6th ed.). New York: Worth Publishers.
:The material was added on March 10, 2006 , so either it has been plagiarized from some earlier edition, or Comer has taken the text from Wikipedia :-) I suspect the former, but it would be good if someone could check it! I'll remove the paragraph for now, it is still available in the history so it can be readded if the text is found out not to be a copyright violation. Fram 20:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism? 

message: "The legendary 7th-century Saint Dymphna... is usually credited for this type of care."  Does this mean that she started it during her life?  Or that she inspired it from heaven? Or does it really mean "The cult that grew up around the shrine where the 7th century St Dymphna was killed directly led to this type of care..."? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dympha credited for this" 

message: The version "Gheel" occurs in the article itself without explanation, and an on-line search shows that it occurs quite often.  When I lived in Belgium that's how I saw it spelled in my English and French circles.  Is there a reason why it can't be mentioned as an alternative, even if simply introduced to say why it should not be used? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 13:19, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  also Gheel?
Talk:Elements of the Philosophy of Right

message: Removed this sentence:
Thus, the thesis of the "end of history," proclaimed by Francis Fukuyama and his followers, cannot with justification be called Hegelian.
Fukuyama says exactly the same thing about internal state organization in the introduction of his book. He is without question very much indebted to Hegel on many aspects.
What is missing here is bibliographic information about the translation of the work into English!!! 
added a section about importance of translation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.37.93.199 (talk) 10:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  rv
Talk:Thatcher effect

message: I added an illustration.  Does this agree with everyone? Alex Dodge 06:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It could maybe use dividing into clearer pairs, rather than an unexplained block of four pictures. --McGeddon (talk) 12:21, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: I have reverted the sample photo to that of one Iain because the effect in the Margaret Tatcher photo is not pronounced at all (although it is fitting in terms of subject).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueStream (talk • contribs) 06:22, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main Photo 

message: I wonder about the accuracy of reporting a conjecture that a shared 30 million year old ancestor processed faces configurally, considering that it may evolve independently in various species which have a social component that find recognition of faces important. I'm going to change the wording to be more tentative, hopefully no-one objects. Ninahexan (talk) 05:06, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhesus monkeys
Talk:Chang-Lin Tien

message: Was there ever controversy that he was simultaneously a member of Academia Sinica and the Chinese Academy of Sciences? Has anyone else every done that? --Dpr 03:16, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John Troyer

message: I provided an external link which has a scholarly article about Troyer. Hopefully someone can use this as the basis for an overhaul of the article.Fawcett5 03:17, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The subject is in principle notable by the source cited. It could use expansion and cleanup, though, and better attribution to sources. I am removing the notability tag. If you disagree, please add it again. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 13:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 

message: I have assessed this as a Stub, as it is only a few sentences long, and as low importance, as I do not feel that many people would be familiar with the subject of the article. Cheers, CP 20:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Indian Native States

message: I have a question. A red link in page means an article which that and other page(s)/article(s)have requested. How do I list the pages/articles which have made the request? e.g. I have just started this article page. On the requested articles page it showed 36 requesting links. I would have liked to check if they all referred to the same subject and not to something such as, say, "native red-indian tribes". Thanks. VivekM 02:19, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Doctors' mess

message: This article was nominated for deletion.  The archive for the nomination has been moved to: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Doctors' mess --AllyUnion (talk) 03:38, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Re "surrealistic nature" and the quote from an unnamed resident: the tone of this article is not appropriate for an encyclopedia. But I am hesitant to edit without soliciting other users' comments.
Hovea 10:54, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 04:08, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008-03-20 Automated pywikipediabot message