Talk:Ultimate X-Men

message: The last sentence reads "was made a boss in Ultimate Spider-man". This should be clarified, as it seems to refer to the video-geme of that name, but I can not verify this. Surely the statement is wrong in regards to the comic series of that title, for I read all issues and the claim is unfounded.  So please, if someone can verify that Wolverine is in the game, link to the game or write "Ultimate Spider-Man videogame", instead of just Ultimate Spider-man. Heinrich krebs (talk) 14:07, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wolverine 

message: "Ultimate X-Men #1 starts with Magneto's Brotherhood committing gigantic bombings which destroy much of Washington and New York. The events of the issue, published in February 2001, contain chilling similarities with the September 11, 2001 attacks."
I'm going to go ahead and delete this... I'm looking through the first couple pages of the issue, and except for the fact that one took place in New York, I'm failing to see how the attacks resemble those of 9/11.  If anyone can shed light on this... etc. Sumogrip 03:48, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I certainly felt chilled to my very core whent that guy dropped his Go-Gurt. --Chris Griswold(☏) 09:21, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  9/11 

message: "It is constantly hinted that he subtly uses mind control to make his X-Men follow him." Where? And how?
:The first time this is mentioned (it think) is by protheus. He's egging beast on that Storm only loves him because Xavier makes her beleve she is. I think Storm herself also mentions something about it even before that, saying something likeit's not her style to remain with a group for so long (she has a criminal background). After the Proteus Arc, beast keeps mentioning the fact that Xavier might make them do things with his mind. This is part of the reason he leaves the x-men.
:Also in the most dangerous game arc Dazzler, Angel and Nightcrawler discuss the possiblity they are not acting on their free will against the orders of Xavier, like they think. He might let them think they are so he doesnt get the blame if something goes wrong. Its a big issue in the series, i dont know how you could miss it? --Robje 21:20, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professor X 

message: "As of December 2005, after almost five years and 65 issues, Colossus and Wolverine have not done their trademark fastball special move yet."
They does it on the cover of issue 25 (193.216.215.41 17:34, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know, but the cover doesn't count IMHO. I am still waiting for it to happen IN PANEL :( Onomatopoeia 16:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fastball special - triviabit 

message: Who is this guy? I know he's new but should he be added to the team list?--Dil 19:57, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Be sure to check out this template page for tips on how to structure a new article. I've found it to be quite helpful. CovenantD 20:51, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Magician (Elliot Boggs)

message: I noticed the article states: "[Boggs] didn't dwell on his parent's deaths, raising the possibility Xavier changed his memories."   Has this speculation been reported anywhere or is it just OR? I didn't get this idea from the comic at all. Newt 15:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone? Newt 20:12, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

text: On the other hand, Kurt did tell the comatose Alison that Peter is "an abomination," and that he "can't even begin to acknowledge what he is."  That sounds pretty homophobic. Breakaway 20:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Professor X changing memories?

message: Does anyone know if they are planning on putting out more Ultimate Collection of Ultimate X men without hard covers? There is Volume #1, which has THe Tomorrow People and Return to Weapon X, but this site only lists that one and know others, although they have more hard cover ones. Just wondering?
yes Volume 2(year two) will come out just before Ultimate X-Men #85 as seen here, it will be released august 1st, issue #85 will be released the following week, on August the 8th. Speaketh now to me! 03:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ultimate Collections in soft covers? 

message: Anyone wanna volunteer writing up something about their relationship with the Fantastic Four since they did meet in UX4 and the President Thor Arc of UFF. -- whipsandchains 17:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relationship to other Ultimate Marvel characters 

message: I removed "Given that Sinister was acting on orders from Apocalypse, some fans believe the apparently dead mutants will actually become the Ultimate version of the Horsemen of Apocalypse," which was added by an unregistered user as it seemed to be weasel-worded OR.  The whole part about the mutants murdered by Sinister seems like it could be OR, but I left the rest as it was. Psyphics 15:46, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cameos and off-panel appearances 

message: I know, when Alex is first introduced in the New Mutants story arc, he's reffered to as Scott's older brother, but in the Magnetic North storyline Bobby reffers to Alex as Scott's kid brother, implying (to me, at least) that Scott is older. Did I misread, or what?67.142.130.41 02:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scott/Alex ages 

message: *Merge CovenantD 00:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I'm curious about the remark regarding sales during Millar's run.  certainly it sold a lot, but I find it curious that it says it was "a big commercial hit, consistently outselling its sister titles, New X-Men, X-Treme X-Men and even Uncanny X-Men".  I'm pretty sure New X-Men outsold it, and the phrasing "even Uncanny X-Men" implies that it was a high seller at the time, when Joe Casey's run was noted for driving the title out of the top twenty for the first time in over a decade.  The citation provided also isn't that clear, as it's just a link to a list of sales charts from the past five years or so.  WesleyDodds 01:34, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, I just looked it up. NXM outsold anything X-Men related, and UXM (during Millar) was generally 2nd. --Onomatopoeia 09:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sales 

message: As a person who lives in Brittan some of these so called bloopers bug me. I have been in a few pubs with children as young as 9 or 10, they don't get alcohol for obvious reasons but they can get in and the bar tender will just keep a close eye on them. Also the one about the flag on the t-shirt/sweater being the wrong colour, it's called fashion , the do weird and wonderful things to the flag sometimes, I've even seen this in American where they modify the flag for fashion.
What really gets me is Mark Millar is Scottish (like my self) and he gets Land's End and John o' Groats mixed up but that’s not the point, the point is/was that the other 2 aren’t really bloopers as such. ≈ Seraph 31 13:12, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally don't see any need for the bloopers section of the article. It's trivia and thus by definition it's not notable.  --Newt ΨΦ 13:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Trivia is notable, there is even a section devoited to Trivia for now. ≈ Seraph 31 13:32, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Trivia is called "trivia" because it's trivial. That means that it's not notable. Additionally, good articles don't have trivia sections. --Chris Griswold 13:53, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Tour 

message: I'd like to know if there has been appointed a writer after Robert Kirkman's current run? It seems odd that there are no rumours or news, not even on Marvel's official site. And, like me, there may be others who would like to know who's the next writer to helm this title. GofferOffer 20:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next writer? 

message: Non-notable minor character article that serves as a repository for plot. Should be merged into this article. --NewtΨΦ 22:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Syndicate (comics)]] 

message: *Merge per my nom above. --NewtΨΦ 22:44, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: All the relevant material is contained in this article.  There's no reason to maintain a seperate article, as per the guidance at Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). Hiding Talk 20:48, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note merge

message: Every team from almost every comic has a Current roster and Notable former members roster. Even the Ultimate Brotherhood of Mutants has one and the Ultimates. Why don't the Ultimate X-men or the Ultimate Academy of Tomorrow (I'm not even sure that needs an Ultimate pre-script) have these list? I'm sure they used to but no longer. Right now we have a list of every X-men member ever, like Beast, who is dead. ≈ Seraph 31 16:21, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: First, we do not differentiate between current and former, because we use present tense to describe fiction. (See WP:CMC/EG.) Second, this article is about a comicbook series and so its infobox does not support team information. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 17:43, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah this article is about a comic book series, a series that focuses on a team of super-heroes... there should be an infobox about which characters are on the team and which have left. The Ultimates article is about a comic book series but also inclues a infobox (I hope I'm useing this tearm right) about the team at the series center. ≈ Seraph 31 14:14, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The Ultimates article is about a team of characters who appear in several comic book limited series. This article is about the series Ultimate X-Men. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 16:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm sure over at the Ultimates talk page they have said that The Ultimates article is about the comic book series named after the team. Looking at it your way the Ultimate X-Men have appeared in all the same comics as The Ultimates at different times. Every other X-Men comic has an infobox about the team as well as some history about the comic it's self. Uncanny X-Men is good example, it doesn't have past characters but it does have a list of the Main character(s) as well as a detailed history of the team. What we have is a list of Writer(s) and Penciller(s) when what we should have is current Writer(s) and Penciller(s) with one of those Succession boxes (I think that's what they are called) on each of the writers pages. ≈ Seraph 31 17:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "I'm sure over at the Ultimates talk page they have said that The Ultimates article is about the comic book series named after the team." Don't be so sure. And you aren't looking at it my way; the Ultimates have had two limited series that featured them: Ultimates and Ultimates 2. Both are covered by the article, in addition to Ultimate War, the Ultimate Extinction stuff, and assorted appearances in other comics. The Ultimate X-Men article treats all other appearances of the team as ancillary to the series. I don't really get what you are saying about writers and pencilers. --Chris Griswold  (☎☓) 17:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The focus of Wikipedia is on real-world impact of the subjects of its articles, be they bits of pop culture or forces of nature or anywhere in between.  Shifting the focus of this article, which is relatively well-defined, would be a detriment. --PsyphicsΨΦ 19:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current roster & Notable former members  

message: Professor X's suppossed love for Jean is not to be mentioned? Zuracech lordum 14:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ultimate X-Men 77

message: Is no one observing this page? Two edits that created a "future developments" section and messed up the "collected editions" occured within the last month. I'm talking about this and this. I hope that there are other conscientous editors who will avert such vandalism in the future. Zuracech lordum 12:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits by anonymous ip addresses

message: Should that be in the info box?, not that im againts it but it just doesnt look right, should that have its own section, giving more detail on what each person actually did, including character creations/deaths/and manipulations(attitude or powers), arcs, significant events, location introduction(i.e. savage land). and if your gonna say, "Well if we do that here we would have to do that every where". no WE wouldnt, but someone who cared should. Speaketh now to me! 03:25, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  creative teams 

message: :Image:Xmlegends.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 08:33, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Xmlegends.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Ultimate X-Men. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051101013607/http://www.newsarama.com:80/Bendis_UXM.htm to http://www.newsarama.com/Bendis_UXM.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Ultimate X-Men. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051101013607/http://www.newsarama.com/Bendis_UXM.htm to http://www.newsarama.com/Bendis_UXM.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051124054319/http://www.newsarama.com/marvelnew/UltWeek/images/UXM/UXMBKV.html to http://www.newsarama.com/marvelnew/UltWeek/images/UXM/UXMBKV.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061210044700/http://www.newsarama.com/marvelnew/ultx_men/kirkman.htm to http://www.newsarama.com/marvelnew/ultx_men/kirkman.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:03, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified