Talk:Cat Among the Pigeons

message: I found :Image:AgathaChristie CatAmongThePigeons.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:AgathaChristie CatAmongThePigeons.jpg]]

message: :Image:AgathaChristie CatAmongThePigeons.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 02:43, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:AgathaChristie CatAmongThePigeons.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Cat Among the Pigeons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090208235116/http://agathachristie.com/story-explorer/stories/cat-among-the-pigeons-1/ to http://www.agathachristie.com/story-explorer/stories/cat-among-the-pigeons-1/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:00, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Archived link leads to the correct original page.  --Prairieplant (talk) 00:22, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: , here is yet another Agatha Christie novel where only your text is allowed to stand. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cat_Among_the_Pigeons&diff=840496902&oldid=837471151 Following your reversion are the usual string of you fixing your own errors, then another editor comes in to improve your text, and you come right back to make it all yours. I do not understand your need to revise all these plot summaries, as you did with Cards on the Table and other articles. They were not a problem, for length or concise writing. A collegial style that respects the work of other editors would be appreciated. Many people read Agatha Christie's novels, even now years after the author has died, and are interested in these articles about her works.  --Prairieplant (talk) 03:29, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot summary reverted