lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Blue Murder (miniseries)

message: There have recently been several changes to the Organised Crime categories without any consensus for the change. This has apparently been initiated by one editor's decision to nominate an existing category for deletion.
Instead of simply reverting edits and becoming embroiled in an edit war, I encourage all interested parties to comment at The Cat for deletion page.
Cheers,  This flag once was red  22:48, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Organized (sic) Crime
Talk:NGC 891

message: Am I correct in the assumption that an "H II nucleus" means hydrogen II-based nucleus? I'm not well-versed in astronomy and feel that this needs clarifying. "H II nucleus" is also mentioned on similar pages. Perhaps we can create an H II page to wikilink this. Can anyone clarify? mheart (talk) 05:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: In astronomy, H II generally means singly-ionized hydrogen, otherwise known as a proton. It's used, for example, with H II regions. I'm not fully clear what is meant by an "H II nucleus", unless they mean the nucleus is an H II region. Hope this helps. Regards, RJH (talk) 21:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  H II nucleus? 

message: The opening describes NGC 891 as an unbarred spiral galaxy, and the morphological class listed in the sidebar is consistent with that, but the Peculiarities section says that there's substantial evidence for a central bar. Which is it? --203.57.211.237 (talk) 11:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barred or unbarred? 
Talk:North Star

message: Wtf?? This article implies there were people at 3000 BC which called Thuban with the title of North Star. That needs a serious explanation..... --euyyn 23:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No it doesn't - it merely says that the title belonged to Thuban at that time. Thuban was the North Star of that time whether anyone called it that or not. Orcoteuthis (talk) 16:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: What needs further explanation is why the author used the term BC instead of BCE. Christianity is a single view point and the source of millions of deaths world wide. Let us start having compassion for all cultures and use BCE: Before the Common Era.
Peace.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmlarios (talk • contribs) 06:54, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The so-called common era is just the Christian one under another name - how can people get so worked up over under what label we are going to be Christianity-centric? If we were to be truly inclusive of other cultures, we'd begin by giving the dates in other calendars alongside the Julian/Gregorian ones. Orcoteuthis (talk) 16:36, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  BCE 

message: Just a question, probobly an easy one, is the north star always in the same place in the sky?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.222.93.5 (talk) 23:29, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  where is the north star??
Talk:Prefectures of China

message: Article is wrong. "Prefecture" is also used to refer to jun and fu. — LlywelynII 04:48, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Imperial prefectures

message: The chart in "Types of prefectural level divisions" uses headings that are not immediately understandable. Please add a legend near the chart to explain what the meaning of SP*, PLC, AP, P, L are.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.33.127 (talk) 16:57, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add heading info
Talk:Exploding tree

message: There is also mention of exploding trees (caused by lots of ice, like inches thick) in "My Side of the Mountain" by Jean Craighead George.
64.201.196.77 00:53, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't forget "My Side of the Mountain" 

message: Template: has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — DropDeadGorgias (talk) 20:04, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TfD nomination of Template:{{ucfirst:Exploding organisms}} 

message: The sentence "Of course, maple trees have survived for millions of years on Earth, without human beings tapping them for maple syrup and without exploding nonetheless" would have provided George Berkeley with some sport!  pablohablo. 08:50, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subjective idealism 

message: The article states:
The root pressure in a maple tree is approximately 0.1MPa, a tenth of one standard atmosphere
This is inconsistent.
Standard atmospheric pressure is about 0.1MPa, so the should either be "approximately 0.01MPa, a tenth ..."
or "approximately 0.1MPa, one standard atmosphere".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ligneus (talk • contribs) 13:15, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pressure 

message: I don't know what I am doing on here but I heard on Internet Today that a recent heat wave caused a tree to explode.
Might want to put it on here.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/200-year-old-tree-explodes-in-portland-due-to-heat-wave/ar-AA10rIEc
https://news.yahoo.com/exploring-curious-case-exploding-tree-134124450.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.30.119.185 (talk) 06:40, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: =

message: This article claims that there is no evidence of trees exploding due to fire. However, the Eucalyptus article claims that ignited Eucalyptus trees have been known to explode. Only one of these statements can be correct, and one of the articles should be corrected to match the other. 2601:280:C980:8BA0:D0F1:7934:5ECF:5AC4 (talk) 06:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction with Eucalyptus article
Talk:Nu Scorpii

message: - I came to this page from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_system#Septuple, and this page also clearly states that Nu Scorpii is a septuple star system, but if Nu Scorpii Aa is a binary star (as is claimed in this article - composed of Nu Scorpii Aaa and Nu Scorpii Aab), doesn't that make Nu Scorpii a Octuple star system? Guss77 (talk) 14:53, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The description is hard to follow, but I think there are only seven stars: see the hierarchy diagram for some clarity.  Component Aa is not a binary, but is one component of the (single-lined) binary referred to as Aab.  The article clearly states that component A is a triple star: the components are shown in the diagram as Aa, Ab, and Ac.  See MSC for a reliable source showing seven stars.  Lithopsian (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah. I misread "Aab". Got it. Guss77 (talk) 16:44, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Septuple?
Talk:Counties of China

message: ROC and PRC are both officially names for "China" anyway, what is the point of having (PRC and ROC) in the title? Why not just county(China)? If Taiwanese independence supporters voice a concern about this we can even draw up a separate article on "county (Taiwan)", or separate the two articles. But this frankly looks very messy. Are we suggesting that for a similar article on Korea it would have to be named "county (DRPK and ROK)"? Colipon+(T) 00:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As the discussion above noted, the current article isn't about the PRC counties. It's about the history and idea of counties in historical China. The current namespace is appropriate for a redirect to a List of the counties of China, but the current material should be at County (China). — LlywelynII 23:44, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move?

message: "the CPC is the central governmental institution in all of Mainland China" ??? You want to be seen as a serious encyclopedic dictionary? LOL. --13Peewit (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  The party is the administration! (?) 

message: * .
has an overview of imperial Chinese administrative divisions. — LlywelynII 14:08, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion

message: The redirect 县 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  — Godsy (TALKCONT) 22:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:县]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Nu Ursae Majoris

message: Kunitzsch has the stress on the 'u' of the Arabic word al-ula, due to it being a long vowel in Arabic (and thus in Latin, if it remained faithful to the original). This contrasts with the Latin word alula, which has a short 'u' and thus stress on the 'a'. — kwami (talk) 04:53, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Ronin Publishing

message: Hi there!  I appreciate your desire for exposure through this venue, but Wikipedia has a pretty strict policy on self-promotion.  If you have issues with a page about you, your business, your friends or family, you should leave a comment here, on the Talk page, asking for any changes that you think are necessary.  This allows others who do not have a conflict of interest to determine whether or not the changes are worth adding.  It sucks to have something misattributed, I understand, but Wikipedia needs to enjoy an orderly editorial process in order to retain any credibility at all.  Thanks for your compliance! -- Joshua BishopRoby 23:05, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dear Owners of Ronin Publishing 

message: i separated the info on the publisher of role playing games (same name) and redirected all links. hope its fixed now. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:57, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig ronin publishing 

message: The article may have passed AFD, but the quality is still very poor. I stand by the bibliography, but the main text is bad, esp. its focus on the publishing lines, which are not that important.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:39, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Quality
Talk:Benjaminville Friends Meeting House and Burial Ground

message: It is my understanding that high style (of whatever style) is an example of a particular architectural style in a structure which incorporates all of the major elements associated with a particular style. Such that, they are excellent illustrative examples of said style. Is this correct? Could this be describe as a high style example of Quaker architecture if it is true? (Based upon: The building is considered a fine example of traditional Quaker architecture because it contains all of the elements found in the typical example meeting house). I thought I would throw this out there in case I have misunderstood the terminology. IvoShandor 10:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: High style?

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  b (MoS): 
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR): 
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
 
Thanks for making the changes I suggested, I added the acre conversion (try to remember to use non-breaking spaces between values and their units, as per WP:UNITS), and so I'm now promoting to GA.  The Rambling Man 07:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review (pass) 
Talk:Rick Jelliffe

message: Is there a Wikipedia compatible photo of Rick Jellife available? ThijsN 14:10, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding a photo 

message: I have added a reference, but no text, to the Standards Australia press release which responds to the ComputerWorld article. I do this 1) to ensure an NPOV and 2) because misrepresentation of me is so widespread that I regard it important to set the record straight: the ComputerWorld article was factually wrong that I am a "Microsoft Developer" and so on. If this is an unacceptable COI edit, please remove it, but IMO the article had "undue weight" and was incomplete. I note that the edit involved no deletion or text, and the press release referenced is not by me.  Rick Jelliffe (talk) 18:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Rick. I have no probs with this bio (or frankly you editing it)...but the bio section has no refs, can you list here or add to the article. Ceoil (talk) 23:17, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extra reference added
Talk:OJ 287

message: If the larger componant is claimed to be the most massive SMBH, shouldn't the article say how massive it is? It says it's six times the previous most massive object known, and it says how massive it's companion is, and it explains how the mass was calculated, but it never says what the mass is.StevoDog21 (talk) 19:17, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mass?

message: The article's wording is a bit inconsistent. In one place, it states: "This kind of variation suggests[7] that an engine is a binary supermassive black hole of two black holes of similar size." but then does on to say: "The smaller supermassive black hole with a mass of only 100 million MSun orbits the larger one with an observed 11-12 year orbital period." Is a factor of 10–20 difference in mass still considered "similar", for the purposes of this article? My gut reaction says no, but I'd like to hear other thoughts. Privong (talk) 11:16, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relative mass of the black holes 

message: The rotation as the Kerr parameter fraction should be seconded by one in absolute metric units (eg Hz)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.238.167.101 (talk) 13:28, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absolute rotation rate? 

message: Was OJ 287 named after OJ Simpson?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.72.205.2 (talk) 09:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  OJ Simpson
Talk:Ellinais

message: Just curious: so what's the full Greek name of this organization? Bi 17:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ΕΛΛΗΝ.Α.Ι.Σ. = ?!? 

message: The link to the .com isn't related to this article at all and is therefore out of the question. The .gr link is in another language though this meets the exceptions listed []. I'm going to add a "greek" template beside the link to notify readers that it is in greek.Wikidudeman (talk) 04:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coming from RFC 

message: Ellinais is in the news again, this time for holding a prayer service on the Acropolis to protest, among other things, the new Acropolis museum.
*San Francisco Chronicle - After 1,500 years, pagans plan Acropolis prayer
*CNN - Greek Acropolis plan draws religious backlash
*Guardian - Greece: Pagans call on Athena to protect the Acropolis
*Canadian Press - Ancient religion's believers pray to Athena, among ruined temples in Greece
Time to update the article. - AdelaMae (t - c - wpn) 23:01, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  September 2008 Acropolis protest
Talk:Walter Burley

message: I have restored helpful changes to this article made by a clearly experienced and knowledgeable editor who has now unfortunately been blocked; I take responsibility for the content. I understand the rationale behind removing them, but I believe that improving the encyclopedia needs to take priority. Philosophy Teacher (talk) 03:59, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously right.KD Tries Again (talk) 05:29, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep the Damian edits
Talk:Hasdai Crescas

message: The Catalan pronunciation is for Hasdai ben Judah Crescas, and not Hasdai ben Abraham Crescas. The latter was the grandson of the former.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.113.151.63 (talk) 00:30, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catalan pronunciation doesn't fully match the name 

message: Classifying Crescas as a "Spanish" philosopher and talmudist is anachronistic. During his lifetime, there was no "Spain" (which from a legal point of view did not exist before 1714), but only the Principality of Catalonia (where Crescas was born) and the Kingdom of Aragón (where he died). His mother tongue was Judaeo-Catalan and he never even learned Spanish/Castilian. 37.14.28.255 (talk) 21:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Spanish" talmudist? 

message: When Crescas refers to the Great Hallel (Hebrew: Hallel ha-Gadol) he isn't referring to the Hallel prayer as linked. He's referring to Psalm 136, which is rabbinically referred to as the Great Hallel. The linked Hallel, psalm 113-118, is the Egyptian Hallel, recited on festivals. The original Hebrew doesn't include the word "prayer" because the Hallel ha-Gadol isn't a prayer, it's a psalm. Posting this here instead of editing the original page because I'm not exactly sure how to link it. If "great Hallel prayer" is from a translation being quoted, then maybe a footnote? But if it's a translation done by editors, and the word "prayer" isn't included in the original text, then it should be changed to "Great Hallel" with a link to psalm 136. Isaacmayer9 (talk) 12:10, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Great Hallel prayer"
Talk:Omicron Capricorni

message: Looking at the SIMBAD data on Omicron Capricorni, I notice that these two stars are too far apart to comprise a physical double, with Omi1 being 73.26 parsecs and Omi2 being 41.86 parsecs distant. So, I suggest the article be changed into a redirect to 2 subsequent articles, much as is done for similar situations, e.g. Xi_Capricorni.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.19.185.235 (talk) 07:55, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The now-included references indicate they are considered a binary system, I believe primarily because of the similar proper motions, and the parallax measurements themselves have a high level of error so they are unreliable indicators. Thanks. Praemonitus (talk) 17:21, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of data
Talk:John Patton Log Cabin

message: *Pantagraph article
*Historic marker
*American Log Buildings, an Old World Heritage, JSTOR
*More from the Pantagraph
IvoShandor 21:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Whereas I don't have a clue where this building might stand I am really sure it isn't located on the place for which coordinates are are given in the article. --Matthiasb (talk) 11:17, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, that seems more reasonable than the middle of a a storage or fabrication hall where the former coordinates have been pointed. From looking on the Google satellite image I'd guess that the building is located about 100 yards more to the south but there are some trees which are covering the details. --Matthiasb (talk) 12:49, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

text: Bing's birdseye view shows this much more clearly. Andrew Jameson (talk) 12:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[John Patton Log Cabin]]
Talk:Omicron Ursae Majoris

message: Is Muscida perhaps the same as Muscidae? (see Wikipedia article Muscidae). In other words, are the stars Omicron, Pi 1, Pi 2 perhaps a cluster of flies in the neighborhood of the greater bear's head? DannyCaes (talk) 18:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Meaning of the name Muscida
Talk:Matthew T. Scott House

message: All of the new material needs a source. Provide here and I can insert it. IvoShandor 00:59, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs source

message: The above term is either a neology or a little used informal form. Google doesn't show any hits on the term and it is not referenced at all in what is considered the bible on American Houses, "A Field Guide to American Houses". I move that this reference is removed and a more formal classification introduced to the article.--IvoShandor (talk) 04:28, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably what is the most authoratative source on the house, the NRHP nomination form states that the rear portion is an "I-Cottage" while the front portion is a true I-House. I suspected just as much, I think that this is the terminology that should be used here. The IHPA's Property Info. Rept. on the house also states "I-House". I would also note that a Google Books search turns up no hits on the term "Kentucky Cat Slide". What are your thoughts Stangboy? --IvoShandor (talk) 04:33, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Kentucky Cat Slide

message: I originally got the term "Kentucky Cat Slide" from the official brochure for the Matthew T Scott House. You can see it here   So I am unsure of what to do here, but I respect your imput and be willing to work with you.  Stangboy7 (talk) 05:53, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcs of Cat Slide
Talk:Omicron1 Canis Majoris

message: How would the name of the star be pronounced? Would it be called "Omicron One", or "Omicron Squared"?
188.25.93.81 (talk) 02:32, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Omicron One ...if any were to be "Omicron Squared", it'd be the star "Omicron2" 02:41, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name pronunciation?
Talk:Vocable

message: Notice that the definition given in this article is "word used without meaning." This should have indicated to readers or potential editors of this article that perhaps it is not "a very minor concept in music theory". Hyacinth 23:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are there multiple non-trivial published works about vocables? If there are, I'll withdraw the nom myself - Tragic Baboon (banana receptacle) 00:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Maybe just find some other articles that make mention of the concept (or ought to) and link this term to those pages?  Actually, this seems like an article that could provide many examples; it shouldn't be considered a minor concept.  Would this extend to things like scat singing, for example? B7T 10:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delete?

message: I'm changing "lexical vocables" to "non-lexical vocables".  I'm really quite sure that's what is meant, but am happy to be corrected. Yaxu 21:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lexical
Talk:Ruben M. Benjamin House

message: Would not there be sufficient justification on having an independent article on Ruben M. Benjamin. As I see it, the current article is half about the owner, half about the house, which is slightly curious to say the least. -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 10:01, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thought about it, just didn't seem like there was enough info to do that, why break things up now, when the article on the house gets longer, yeah, for sure. Why does that seem "curious"? It seemed like adherence to WP:SUMMARY to me. IvoShandor 10:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I feel people are too quick to give an article to anything. I find so many crappy articles, just because they feel there needs to be one. I say, once the article gets longer, I would maybe then split it, have a small section to Ruben, with a main article link to his own. This can be done down the road.--Kranar drogin 11:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I was thinking about writing about fictional portrayals of Ruben Benjamin, but that would feel kind of silly in an article about his house... -- Cimon Avaro; on a pogostick. 21:21, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, I mean if you have something, go ahead and split it off. I don't have a problem with it, we can reorganize this and then summarize Mr. Benjamin here with a link pointing to . The only reason I didn't do it is because I didn't really think I had enough information to do more than create two stubs, seemed dumb to separate such closely related material until we had more, which it seems we do. I had no idea he was portrayed in fiction, in what? IvoShandor 05:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On a related note, you don't know anything more about the house do you? IvoShandor 05:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting the article into one on the house, one on the man?