Talk:Asheville, North Carolina/Archive 1

message: Keep the Asheville Mall article as it is, don't merge it with Asheville, NC.  There's no point to that, if someone needs information about Asheville Mall.  A lot of the other malls in NC have articles. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cantnot (talk • contribs) ..
:On May 5, 2005, Asheville Mall was nominated for deletion.  The result was merge/redirect.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Asheville Mall. --Ezeu 09:51, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asheville Mall 

message: I think the section on Joshua Warren's book is overstating the book's influence.  Anyone else?  The Asheville article mentions Thomas Wolfe (as it should), but it doesn't mention Look Homeward, Angel.  Fair enough.  But then it mentions Joshua Warren and Warren's book.  Wolfe's book is a classic of American literature.  Haunted Asheville isn't nearly so famous.  Haunted Asheville isn't nearly the tourist draw that the article suggests.
Does anyone else want to air an opinion on this?  Mr Frosty 16:53, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joshua Warren 

message: I think the music section has gotten out of hand.  Too many bands are mentioned.  The article states that the bands are "notable", but no evidence is proffered to support that claim.  I think it just looks like promotion.  I am in support of Asheville's music scene, but I don't think Wikipedia should be used as a promotional tool for it.   Would anyone else like to weigh in on this?   Mr Frosty 16:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The section could at least use some line breaks. Zeno Izen 02:01, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, there's your line breaks.  Next edits by me will remove all non-notable local bands/acts. Wikipedia:Notability (music) Unless someone else beats me to it.  (hint) Zeno Izen 20:43, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. The section should be shortened, and lines like "of course it would all be meaningless without a place to perform" should be removed. The description of the concerts themselves also seems a little out of place for an encyclopedia - sounds more like a concert review.--AaronM 16:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree.  There is no need for that lengthy list of bands.  It looks rather foolish. Arx Fortis 23:20, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Music 

message: Righty, nice work Arx... In the interest of further solidifying the list, I looked up all the remaining 'bands' at allmusic.com.  Here are my notes.  'one&same?' means I found the band at allmusic, but couldn't find anything to verify that the band I found was the one referred to by the Asheville article. 'check' means I found the band and a reference to either Asheville or North Carolina in that band's entry, suggesting that the band is the one referred to in the Asheville article.
I think the rest of my notes are self-explanatory.  Let me know if they aren't.  
* Chuck Brodsky  
** check North Carolina ref. in bio
* Mad Tea Party  
** this band at allmusic.com is one&same?
* Dig Shovel Dig  
** not found at allmusic.com  Other notability?
* David LaMotte 
** minimal info at allmusic.com  one&same?
* Christine Kane
** check (with specific ref. to Asheville in allmusic.com bio)
* Mother Vinegar
** not found
* Paperboy
** Unclear.  Four variations on name.  No detailed bios on any of the four.
* GFE
** check North Carolina ref. in review
* Reigning Sound
** one&same?
* Scrappy Hamilton
** one&same?
* SeepeopleS
** check Asheville ref. in bio
* Allison King
** one&same? (plus I'm wondering if 4 background vox credits really amounts to notability)
* Red Light Trio
** one&same?
- Zeno Izen 18:37, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  More re: pruning 'bands' 

message: Asheville has quite a large GBLT community, anyone think to add such statistics and points of interest to the article?
Oni-dracula 22:00, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  That would probbly be a fine addition to the article.  Maybe, in the 'Demographics' section. Zeno Izen 16:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GBLT community 

message: This sentance doesn't seem to provide any information unique or especially interesting to Asheville: "There are many opportunities as in other schools including sports (student-athletes must be making at least a C in all subjects), AIG (Academically/Intellectually Gifted), National History Day, Math Counts, Battle of the Books, Odyssey of the Mind, and Science Olympiad."   
How is this different than any other city?  Are these activities not available elsewhere?  I think this sentance should be removed.  Thoughts?  Arx Fortis 17:15, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed and deletion made. - Zeno Izen 18:43, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schools 

message: Now that the list of musicians has been knocked down to a less cumbersome size, I suppose I'll try to make the main text of the section more encyclopedic.  If anyone knows any good Asheville + Music sources on the web, please please PLEASE point me toward them.  I don't have any Asheville books handy.  My first Google search proved unhelpful.  Clearly I'm going to need some input. - Zeno Izen 15:59, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Made major edits.  Don't have time to do more right now. - Zeno Izen 17:14, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looking good, Z.  I made a few edits the other night.  The list doesn't seem to be as much of an eyesore. Arx Fortis 02:31, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing music section.  Request for sources 

message: Asheville is my hometown, but this article seems gushy and canned. It's like the Chamber of Commerce wrote it. I don't think it neccesarily violates NPOV or encyclopedic tone, but it certainly feels wrong to me.
:I agree.  Most Ashevillians are rather proud of their city; This article does display bias.  Perhaps specific sections/sentances can be cited before a re-vamp of the article commences? Arx Fortis 06:52, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Another agreement.  I added the "metropolitan area" section a while back, and have otherwise refrained from making changes.  The lists should be rethought - it's common to city articles on WikiPedia in general, but lengthy lists really make articles look silly and amateurish.  If there's enough material to throw a list together, the entire section could be spun off into a more thorough article. --Davidals 01:06, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This reads like a press release. 

message: Someone added "who founded the city" to the end of the second paragraph.  Can a source be provided? Arx Fortis 06:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Has this been fixed?  I don't see it. Zeno Izen 23:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded city? 

message: Errm... It's gotten quiet here. 
It seems to me that the linking war is only a symptom of larger problems with this article. Much of the "writing" here consists of listing links and promotional factoids. For example, the following breathless passage is hardly "General Information" (where it is now): 
"In the year 1900, author Thomas Wolfe was born in Asheville. Author F. Scott Fitzgerald lived and worked in Asheville during some of his literary career. His wife, Zelda, died in a fire in an Asheville sanitarium in 1948. In 1933, actress Eileen Fulton was born in Asheville. In 1939, singer Roberta Flack was born in the city.[10] In 2005 alleged bomber Eric Robert Rudolph was transported to Asheville from Murphy, North Carolina for arraignment in federal court. In September 2004, major flooding was reported in town, particularly at Biltmore Village, due to rains from the remnants of Hurricane Frances and Hurricane Ivan."
 
May I suggest that, after the article is unblocked, the article should be thoroughly reorganized according to an outline?
I suggest including: Geography, History, Demographics, Metropolitan area, Government, Economy, Education, Media, Transportation, Arts and culture, Sports and recreation, Notable natives and residents (to include people like Thomas Wolfe who may be mentioned elsewhere in the article), Sister cities, References, and External links. 
Some items will need to be moved. For example, the sentence "Asheville is home to University of North Carolina at Asheville, a liberal arts college of about 3500 students (part of the University of North Carolina System), and Asheville-Buncombe Technical Community College" should be moved into Education. --orlady 00:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outline? 

message: :This discussion page is getting rather large.  Because I'm not sure how to do it myself, and I don't have the time to look it up, I'd like to offer a motion to archive this discussion page and start fresh. Zeno Izen 21:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I archived most of 2006 discussions (except for those still ongoing). I will archive more later. ++ Arx Fortis 01:41, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This discussion page 

message: The third pgraph of the General Information section, there is a list (in pgraph form) of magazine articles that mention Asheville.  I think it would be more informative to include the publication years of the articles in the actual paragraph.  The problem is that simply sticking the years in there will make the paragraph look very cluttered.  There are already a lot of quotation marks and citation numerals in the paragraph, and the addition of four-digit years would probably take the text over the edge into serious eyesore territory.  Yet, we surely don't need another bulleted list in the article.
Dilemma!  Any suggestions?  Zeno Izen 20:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would suffice to say that Asheville has received significant media coverage in the media, then simply use citations for the sentance to give some examples (no more than 3-4 of the most significant articles). ++Arx Fortis 05:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion re: magazine articles 

message: I don't know how to work this URL into the body of the article, or a link to it, but here it is:  http://cirrus.dnr.state.sc.us/cgi-bin/sercc/cliMAIN.pl?nc0301  Asheville gets about 37 inches of precip per year (not the 80-100 inches claimed in the article, so I removed that "fact").  Some areas in the WNC mountains get much more precipitation than does Asheville.  The Highlands area is a good example.  But that rain falls on Highlands, not on Asheville. Mr Frosty 16:58, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Precipitation 

message: A user (24.178.172.145) has deleted the same information from this article three times (5 July, 9 July, and 24 July).  The user has not given any reason for the deletion.  The 9-day launch of a well known band's national tour in Asheville certainly meets WP:NOTABILITY for this article and is cited.  It should be noted that the same user added information on a different music venue in Asheville.  This gives the appearance of a conflict-of-interest on the part of that user.  After first warning the user, I have now asked the user to stop removing the information and to present their reason(s) for deletion on this page.  ++Arx Fortis 23:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smashing Pumpkins 

message: I have assessed this article as B-class, with a mid-level importance to WP:CITIES. Mid-importance because, despite a population lower than 200,000, it is nonetheless a major population/industrial/business city in western north carolina.
I think this article is better than Start-class because it has a significant amount of information, and has started to assemble information into reasonably good categories. However, there is still quite a bit of work done before the article meets the Good article criteria, primarily on the prose, organization, and completeness factors. The lead section is also very short -- it should provide an adequate summary of the article -- but it does have some of the basics: population, metro area size, rough location. Consider nuking the 'general information' section, and move much of that info into the lead, or to other areas of the article, as appropriate.
The first four main sections should roughly follow this order: History, Geography & Climate, Demographics, Economy. Transportation can be moved nearer to the end of the article, and possibly included as a subsection under 'Infrastructure', adding to that info on local utilities, communications, and hospitals.
The 'Metropolitan Area' section can be included under 'Geography'. Add population history (many other cities have a table with populations every decade for this) as well as information on crime, to the 'demographics' section.
Consider moving the list of famous residents to a separate page, linking to it under 'see also'.
Combine the 'local culture' section with the list of 'points of interest' into one section called 'arts and culture'. Expand. Include photos. This section shouldn't be a list at all -- write out descriptions and significance as prose. Arts and culture should probably fall, in the order of sections, right after 'economy'. The article, of course, does lack an economy section. A description of the business and industry in Asheville should be included. Provide more than just a listing of major corporations and fortune 500 companies.
:Much thanks Dr. Cash!  This gives us an excellent starting point. ++Arx Fortis 23:59, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That should give some good information to get you started. Hope that helps. Consider also looking at some of the info at WP:CITIES for guidelines on city articles. Cheers! Dr. Cash 21:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article assessment: B-class 

message: I haven't touched this page in a while, but I've just noticed a large block of text in the history section that would do well broken up into a couple of paragraphs, and also needs some citations.  I will make the lightest possible edits here for the sake of readability and also add some 'ref' tags.  
Zeno Izen 17:12, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm about to make an edit... 

message: I can't be 100% certain (or else I'd remove it) but I'm going to go ahead and accuse "South College-Asheville" of being an online "degree - granting - institute" having little to (most likely) no connection to Asheville, barely deserving of it's "college" moniker, and far less deserving of inclusion on this page.  Regardless of that, since it's a stock webpage generated by colleges.us.com, it shouldn't be included outside of external links, and since it's a marketing scam anyway, probably not there either.  I'll remove it in a week if no one protests.Gh05t (talk) 23:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  South College? 

message: An archive of this page was established some time ago.  Rather than manually archiving the page, I've setup MiszaBot to do it.  I've set the bot to archive any discussions that have not had any activity for longer than 180 days.  Archived discussions can be accessed via the link at the top of the page.  Thanks to Zeno Izen for pointing out the need for another round of archiving. :)  ++Arx Fortis (talk) 16:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  FYI: Archiving 

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "Census" :
** Population Finder: Asheville, North Carolina. U.S. Census Bureau, 2005 Population Estimates. Accessed February 10, 2007.
** Population Finder: Asheville, North Carolina. U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 Population Estimates. Accessed February 10, 2007.
DumZiBoT (talk) 15:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 

message: Is all the information about the city council members prudent?  This information is subject to change each election cycle.  Basic information about the structure of the council and perhaps the names of its members is one thing.  To list all of the other information seems like overkill.  This is an article about Asheville, not the Asheville City Council.  The section reads more like promotional material than an encyclopedia article. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 17:37, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  City Council section 

message: I know this is an Asheville page, but New Orleans hardly claims the nickname "Paris of the South".  While my personal experience made the notation jump out at me as blatantly incorrect, I understand I must use something other than my 35 years of living there to prove such.  Unfortunately, when trying to prove a negative you are going have difficulty to prove no one has called any city south of the Mason-Dixon with a museum or two artists the Paris of the South at some point.  If you Google ["paris of the south" "new orleans" -asheville -charlotte -buenos -hotel -savannah], to eliminate cities that have claimed that name, you will find there are only 47 times on Google that it's ever used (You must click the last page of results to eliminate mirrored websites).  And even using that, I couldn't eliminate some results actually referring to another city, such as Barcelona, as the PotS.  Tourist websites, the same ones that will swear there is really a "house of the rising sun" in New Orleans and that ghosts regularly roam the French Quarter, are not credible for citation.  Just about any plausible nickname has been applied to New Orleans.  If you want to see, Google ["New Orleans" Saintsland], something I just came up with, and you find that my created nickname is even more popular in reference to New Orleans than Paris of the South.  Plus, I seriously doubt this nickname would last very long if placed on Wikipedia's main New Orleans page, or any longer than my created "Saintsland".  Mdlawmba (talk) 12:37, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Your decision to unilaterally revert the copious books, magazines, and web pages where this title is listed is quite puzzling.  As I have previously stated, your personal experience cannot be used as a "source" or reason for removing assertions that are clearly documented by separate, distinct, published, verifiable, reliable sources.  Your actions are clearly against WP:NOR.  (Read 2nd to last paragraph).  Do not revert this edit further.   ++Arx Fortis (talk) 13:56, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I have provided ample reasoning, other than personal, to remove the particular city, and more than adequate reason for this page to not become a list of cities that are likewise referred to by that name. In addition, I believe I offered a very reasonable and attractive alternative in just stating several southern cities use the name.  This is a very popular nickname for many southern cities both in the "The South" and internationally. There is a reason a list page of city nicknames exists, and it's so people don't list every possible nickname of a city, much less cities that share nicknames.  Please do not take the edit personally, which I'm sure Wikipedia has a page devoted to as well. Mdlawmba (talk) 14:38, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Your reasoning is flawed.  The two reasons you've stated are: 1.  You lived in New Orleans for 35 years and never heard it called Paris of the South.  2. You did a questionable google search where you eliminated the mention of other specific cities.     Your first reason is clearly Original Research and is not acceptable.  Your second reason is flawed in that you eliminated any results that would have had any mention of other cities that also share the name.  Moreover, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence - to argue that position is a logical fallacy (see the article Argument from Ignorance)   Regardless, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that relies on verifiable sources.  I have listed books, magazines, and other reliable sources.  Unless you can establish that each and every one of those many sources is not reliable, the mention should stand.   I am referring this issue for administrator intervention based on your violation of the WP:3RR three revert rule. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 14:57, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Okay, hopefully we can move on from the accusation of edit warring now that myself and Arx were both warned and there clearly was not a violation of the three revert rule.  I would like to have some third-party opinions as to whether this should be just a statement such as "The Paris of the South (also used by several other southern cities)", as I have revised it or a list of other cities that use the "Paris of the South" nickname.  Note that the  "other southern cities" can be reworded to link to the [List_of_city_nicknames_in_the_United_States] so if you want to find other cities using the name you can just click and browse your heart's desire.  The linked page is not extensive, but it can be updated to include our research.  Please note that including the list of cities using the name is extensive and includes: 
Atlantahttp://www.artsandantiques.net/Articles/News-Market/WEB-EXCLUSIVE-Paris-of-the-South.asp , Augustahttp://www.parisofthesouth.com/ http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/masters07/news/story?id=2818879 http://chat.augustachronicle.com/stories/2004/05/30/cit_417232.shtml, and Savannahhttp://shoutaboutcarolina.wordpress.com/2008/08/29/old-fort-jackson-historic-sites-near-savannah-and-hilton-head/, Georgia; Birminghamhttp://www.vergie.com/birmingham_al.html  and Mobilehttp://www.fammed.usouthal.edu/GarrowsBend/MPNewsletter.pdf  Alabama; Charlestonhttp://www.tripcart.com/usa-regions/Georgia-South-Carolina,Romantic-Vacations-Getaways.aspx#Guide|Top|| , South Carolina; Buenos Aireshttp://www.tangol.com/Prensa/UsaToday/USAToday_20030110.htmhttp://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_7161/is_200701/ai_n32208732/pg_4/ , Argentina; Aix-en-Provencehttp://www.thetraveleditor.com/article/2345/Introduction_General_Aix_en_Provence_the_Paris_of_the_South.html  and Toulousehttp://www.countrylife.co.uk/property/guidesinternational/article/311826/The-hidden-south-of-France.html , France; and Barcelonahttp://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/klu/gejo/2000/00000051/F0020001/00334249 , Spain among other.
I see no reason to list other cities using the name, but rather a simplified statement, but I am opening this up to discussion.  I look forward to the opinions of disinterested third-parties. 
Mdlawmba (talk) 14:58, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

text: This is a vanity issue that needs to be left off. While Asheville is indeed a very beautiful city, it is hardly Paris. This doesn't really inform the reader of anything and comes across as being the cause of a lame edit war. It is better left cut from the article entirely since it really isn't important and looks precocious.⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 15:33, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paris of the South 

message: The new section "Places of worship" was removed with the following edit summary: Removing section. There are literally HUNDREDS of these in AVL. This is an encyclopedia, not a directory. This section is nothing but a magnet for lameness as every local adds his own I note that this article has, for example, a list of various schools including "Claxton Elementary, Hall Fletcher Elementary, Isaac Dickson Elementary, Ira B. Jones Elementary, and Vance Elementary". I also note the article has a lengthy list of various famous or not-so-famous people who have lived at one point in Asheville, or, in some cases, live "adjacent to" or "near" Asheville. I also note that the article devotes many lines to various minor league sports teams, including, for example, a full line to the "Asheville Aces", a hockey team that played in the 7-team "Southern Professional Hockey League", and existed for exactly one year. I also note that the article gives long, unsourced lists of various television programs and motion pictures that were "made at least partially in the area". So, it's clear that any concerns about that "Places of worship" section being a "directory" of "lameness" relies on very inconsistent definitions of the terms.
As to the specific "lame" section, it had exactly three items in it. Note, all the places of worship in the section have Wikipedia articles (unlike, say, the schools listed in this article). Thus any concerns that HUNDREDS of these will be added are unwarranted. At some point there might be as many as 7 or 8 articles on Asheville places of worship, but there certainly won't be HUNDREDS. Therefore, I am restoring this reasonable and informative section. Jayjg (talk) 01:40, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Places of worship 

message: John Evans Brown was a 19th century Member of Parliament in New Zealand. A native Pennsylvanian, he returned to the US in his later years and settled in Asheville. I've written an article about him, but there's little known in New Zealand sources about his later life. Maybe some Asheville locals could help by looking for an obituary etc. Thanks a lot. Schwede66 23:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  a former resident 

message: The sentence has nothing to do with ref 25. Is there anywhere this is backed up? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.113.103.18 (talk • contribs) 
:I think it correctly references the Frommer's claim? feydey (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 25 

message: Please stop edit warring over the nicknames. If you have a reliable source that shows a nickname, you can put it in, otherwise, please stop vandalizing the page. I also took out the sentence about the Berkeley reference as is not a real nickname of the city, but something suggested by the author of the article referenced. Thank you -- JoannaSerah (talk) 19:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicknames 

message: ALSO......................... 
.............................
there needs to be something about Asheville being Beer City USA 3 years in a row / supporting a large number of microbreweries.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.182.69.48 (talk) 01:46, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there doesn't really. I just took out the paragraph about it since the only references cited were spam links. Also, the source of this award is an online poll by the readers of Examiner.com. This can't be used as a source since it is not considered a reliable source and the site is on Wikipedia's external link blacklist. Thank you -- JoannaSerah (talk) 19:30, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I'm slightly concerned about the possibility of a sock here, it seems to me as though since it's mentined by the Citizen-Times and the Mountain XPress several times, and is mentioned in several books , that it should be mentioned in the article. Dougweller (talk) 21:58, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I had been searching for it, but hadn't run across that yet for the few books. If there are Citizen-Times or Mountain Xpress articles mentioning it, then, yeah that would be a reliable source to me. Most of the links I had found at first were just Examiner.com articles or spam/advert links. The references in the article here were just to spam links. But if anyone else wants to add it with RS, that's fine by me. Thank you -- JoannaSerah (talk) 03:58, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beer City 

message: I believe that more could be added to this page about the culture of Asheville.  Rinnibeck (talk) 15:45, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Culture 

message: "Urban" and "Metro" are lines in the sidebox, but there are no units. What are they? Number of people? A ratio? A casual reader not familiar with demographics has no way of knowing this, even after clicking through to the linked Urban Area article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tarheelcoxn (talk • contribs) 02:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units for Urban Area and Metro Area in sidebar 

message: White House denies Obamas have bought post-presidency dream home in North Carolina town known for its wealthy 'Trustafarians' by David Martosky; 9 June 2014.--Artaxerxes 01:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Obamas

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Asheville, North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100926170809/http://outsideonline.com:80/outside/destinations/200608/best-outside-towns-2006-8.html to http://outsideonline.com/outside/destinations/200608/best-outside-towns-2006-8.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070520061357/http://www.ymicc.org:80/history.html to http://www.ymicc.org/history.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20131201165925/http://www.blueridgesustainability.org:80/green-restaurant-initiative/ to http://www.blueridgesustainability.org/green-restaurant-initiative/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927130728/http://www.ledger-dispatch.com/life/lifeview.asp?c=217801 to http://www.ledger-dispatch.com/life/lifeview.asp?c=217801
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130524100121/http://www.differentstrokesavl.com/about.html to http://www.differentstrokesavl.com/about.html
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150207095253/http://www.debaunare.com/FTW/ to http://www.debaunare.com/FTW/
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070824113931/http://www.ashevillesistercities.org:80/val2.html to http://www.ashevillesistercities.org/val2.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Asheville, North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721034521/http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_PL_GCTPL2.ST13&prodType=table to http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_PL_GCTPL2.ST13&prodType=table
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110531210815/http://www.naco.org/Counties/Pages/FindACounty.aspx to http://www.naco.org/Counties/Pages/FindACounty.aspx
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://cherokeehistory.com/original.gif
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070526063716/http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metro_general/2006/List4.txt to http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metro_general/2006/List4.txt
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070629011223/http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metro_general/2006/List6.txt to http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metro_general/2006/List6.txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:51, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Asheville, North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070629011245/http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metro_general/2006/List5.txt to http://www.census.gov/population/www/estimates/metro_general/2006/List5.txt
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:58, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Asheville, North Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://factfinder2.census.gov/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.aarpmagazine.org/travel/Articles/a2003-03-27-mag-bestplaces.html
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.heritagewnc.org/buildings/s%26w_cafeteria.htm
*Added archive https://archive.is/20160602200744/http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html to http://www.census.gov/popest/data/cities/totals/2015/SUB-EST2015.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified