lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vicariate for Palestinian–Jordanian Communities in the USA

message: The material on this page is exactly what is in the opening of the same article at the Orthodox Wiki.  However, from looking at both article histories, it appears that the material was added here first, and is thus licensed under GFDL and not the dual license of the Orthodox Wiki.  -- Pastordavid 21:41, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright
Talk:John of Shanghai and San Francisco

message: I'm a casual user of wikipedia, and not an editor per se, but the tone of this article strikes me as rather uncyclopedic and as if written by someone who really liked the guy - and it shows. Would it be preferable to alter the choice of words and place footnotes for the more colorful claims? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a00:c440:20:11bc:382c:65a0:a05c:5088  (talk • contribs) 01:21, 13 November 2012
: IMHO, the tone of the article is fine, just maybe "He is beloved and celebrated worldwide" requires some links. The article wasn't written by one person, the text was revised and corrected many times by different editors. B7elijah (talk) 18:33, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone of article
Talk:Please Don't Talk About Me When I'm Gone

message: First of all, just removed two pieces of orignal research concerning the chords of the main melody, and the movie Bambi, of all things! I removed one dead link, and replaced another from the Vault Festival, evidently of London. Its website includes a "trap box," which insists that the user click on it to leave the page. Beware. Its address is www.vaultfestival.com  Tapered (talk) 08:09, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research, malware
Talk:Robilar

message: I believe this article now has references from secondary sources that are in-line, most of the article now concerns development of the character (i.e. not in-universe). This would seem to address previous concerns. Unless someone objects, I would suggest removing the banners.Guinness323 (talk) 05:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Where's the cite on Robilar being CG (as per the infobox)? Every source I've seen has the character starting out as Lawful Neutral and gradually drifting to a somewhat benign form of Lawful Evil.Pat Payne (talk) 22:05, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chaotic Good? 
Talk:Royal Marines Police

message: The official name of the organisation is the Royal Marines Police. See Hansard. Troop is its size. -- Necrothesp 15:52, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Presumably there are RM Policemen employed elsewhere in the Corps and in the wider Naval Service, in which case the Troop element within 3 Cdo is just that, a Troop element rather than the entire Police Service?  I can see arguments on both sides, for example Y Troop may offer a precedent.ALR 15:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that the article was created (by me) as a general article about the Royal Marines Police, not specifically about the Police Troop of 3 Commando Brigade. Others changed the focus to the troop, so it seems a little odd to use that as justification for renaming the article. There is, according to Hansard and the Police and Constabulary Almanac, an organisation called the Royal Marines Police (of which the Police Troop is the primary part), which is where this article should have stayed. -- Necrothesp 21:46, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've nosed around this morning and agree, the article should be RM Police.  Unfortunately that confirmation was verbal and R documents so not citable.ALR 08:20, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

text: It appears in the annual Police and Constabulary Almanac as the Royal Marines Police, and NCOs from it apparently serve as advisers with other RM units. The Troop is the only formed unit, but "RM Police" does appear to be used as a generic term. -- Necrothesp 19:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Patriarchal Exarchate for Orthodox Parishes of Russian Tradition in Western Europe

message: After some discussion on the talk page of the vicariate article, I've folded the text from that article into a subsection of this main Exarchate entry. As was discussed there, this lets us prevent an unnecessary multiplication of pages, and also sorts out the problem of heading an entry on the Vicariate (i.e. as a subset of the Exarchate, we don't have to have an article with the fantastically long title: "Episcopal Vicariate of Great Britain and Ireland (Patriarchal Exarchate for Orthodox Parishes of Russian Tradition in Western Europe, Patriarchate of Constantinople)"). —Antonios Aigyptostalk 14:43, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: I've reworked the text a bit to make the whole article more coherent, and not as much a piecemeal of the former articles. I've also corrected pointers to the Vicariate article around the Wiki system, so they point to its new location as a subsection of this article. We should be ready to convert the old article to a redirect soon. —Antonios Aigyptostalk 18:13, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Folding vicariate article into this page 

message: I've updated this article to bring it up to speed with current events. I've also removed the "this article is in need of an expert" tag, since it is now thoroughly footnoted by many contributors. —Antonios Aigyptostalk 21:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating to current status, removing "needs experts" tag 

message: I tagged this article and the article Russian Orthodox Exarchate in Western Europe for merge, as they are clear duplicates. I pointed the merge here, as it's the older article, but I have no opinion on which should be the final title. It's just a clear case of needing a merge. I would be bold, but I don't know much about the subject and wouldn't want to leave out anything important. Especially since the British deanery article has already been merged here. oknazevad (talk) 17:49, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed that the articles must be merged.  I think that the shorter title is fine (i.e., Russian Orthodox Exarchate in Western Europe), but perhaps the official title used on their website is appropriate (Archdiocese of Russian Orthodox Churches in Western Europe)  Paterakis (talk) 20:18, 5 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Merged August 15, 2014 Natg 19 (talk) 07:34, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

text: Indeed, the current title Russian Orthodox Exarchate in Western Europe gives the impression that it is a jurisdiction of the Russian Orthodox Church, which it is not. I'll follow the above suggestion and rename it to the title used by the Exarchate itself, Archdiocese of Russian Orthodox churches in Western Europe. Place Clichy (talk) 13:40, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge tag
Talk:Prosphora

message: Hi chaps - now, in common English, we refer to 'one prosphora, two prosphoras', this being derived from Slavic, where 'prosfora' is singular, I think. On the other hand, in Greek, 'prosphora' is clearly plural, the singular being 'prosphoron'. How shall we state this? We should make this clear before someone comes along and renames the article to 'Prosphoron', citing wiki guidelines preferring singular forms. InfernoXV 16:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plurals and Singulars 
Talk:Raphael of Brooklyn

message: The first sentence of the article is obviously not intended to mean what it says. "Saint Raphael of Brooklyn ... was born ... of Damascene Syrian parents of Greek Orthodox parents." My guess is that it should say "... was born ... to Damascene Syrian parents of Greek Orthodox belief." But I really don't know, so I'm not going to correct it myself. Maproom (talk) 21:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the preposition is wrong, I'll fix it. George Al-Shami (talk) 22:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parentage 

message: You've made a few unexplained changes and added several pieces of unreferenced content. It would be appreciated if you could explain those changes and provide relevant sourcing (or explain where material can be found in present sourcing). If not, I'll restore the version before your changes. ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:24, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted following failure to discuss. ~ Pbritti (talk) 03:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent tweaks
Talk:Edgewood High School of the Sacred Heart

message: Sorry, but I'm at a complete loss as to how all this now works. A year ago, I had authority to simply go in and update things like a recent championship or enrollment stats. Now I have to get each change approved? Who is checking that the changes are correct and how? Not everything has a citable source other than personal knowledge of an institutions stats. If I'm considered to have a COI, what about a competitor? Very confusing and the "explanatory" pages about this whole process just make it more so. :-(  Jottney (talk) 18:00, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Slave Lords

message: Very well done with this page.Iquander 19:53, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Iq!--Robbstrd 22:11, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excellent Summary 
Talk:Tasha (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: Is there really any point to a page for a character whose gone from a name attached to a spell to an alias for a character who already has an article? I know there's Rich Trickey's alternate version, but I'm not sure that justifies the article. Daibhid C (talk) 19:43, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Watermelon Man (composition)

message: I just came across the blues track Blue Mood by Little Walter, which to my ears sounded suspiciously similar to the tune of Watermelon Man! We shouldn't add any original research to the article, but does anyone have any legitimate reference about their similarity or about one inspiring the other? --213.104.249.48 (talk) 10:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Walter 

message: Shouldn't there be some mention of the strong African influence on the intro of this song?
83.195.200.29 (talk) 16:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ba-Benzele 

message: — Assignment last updated by Isha0323 (talk) 19:31, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Black American Music
Talk:Tharizdun

message: This page needs a little revision to be brought up to date. Some of the suppositions (such as Tharizdun's domain) are fan conjecture. The most concrete information on Tharizdun comes from the following source: http://ulmo.mux.net/greyhawk/tharizdun.html
Those 22 questions, answered by Tharizdun's creator Gary Gygax himself in correspondance covers much of the information here, as well as debunks the claims that Tharizdun was imprisoned in the Demiplane of Imprisonment. --63.22.171.173 (talk) 11:09, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision

message: ...is bullshit. Now deleted. 74.192.155.210 (talk) 02:45, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tharizdun in 4E: "One rumor"? 

message: In the 1999 Guide to Hell Asmodeus is a Serpent form higher than the gods, an elder dark power responsible for formation of around 50% of the multiverse and a lot of the lower planes. This would make Tharizdun a power, if creating the Abyss out of the elemental chaos, on par with Asmodeus under his name (as the guide to hell, if taken from its canon view, the interesting thing about D&D is that there are multiple canon's that are reconciled to one level or another) of Ahriman. So Tharizdun/Ahriman being the dark chaotic and dark lawful supreme evils pretty much. 4.242.174.226 (talk) 09:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know if it's a good idea to make direct comparisons like that between second edition and fourth edition - wacky physics! 24.148.0.83 (talk) 12:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tharizdun on plane creation ala Ahriman 
Talk:Porcupinefish

message: Need a pic of one of these as a ball.  --John Moser (talk) 03:38, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ball 

message: any other orgs/business out there using the subject as a mascot? Is this unsourced material relevent to this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Correctionpatrol4 (talk • contribs) 04:55, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  mascot section? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Nurbekyuldashov (talk) 01:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Linguistics in the Digital Age
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Connect the Dots

message: I've identified this project as a candidate for material to be analyzed by Wikipedia Integration methodology. Please feel welcome to offer suggestions and feedback. WP:ʃ Cwolfsheep 16:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Hello. The WikiProject Council has recently updated the Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory.  This new directory includes a variety of categories and subcategories which will, with luck, potentially draw new members to the projects who are interested in those specific subjects. Please review the directory and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope that all the changes to the directory can be finished by the first of next month. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you.   B2T2 13:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project directory 

message: Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention.  Badbilltucker 18:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Day|Wikipedia Day]] Awards
Talk:Tomb of the Lizard King

message: I removed the Greyhawk references from the article and the Greyhawk template from the Talk Page here.  I believe the setting is originally generic for this module, not Greyhawk.  It is true that the Keoland Living Greyhawk triad "adopted" this module and placed it in the Hool Marshes, but I don't think that qualifies as making this an "official" Greyhawk module.  Perhaps if someone believes this point is notable enough, it could be added with a mention in the article. Fairsing 05:42, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.--Robbstrd 21:28, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Campaign Setting
Talk:Trithereon

message: I've removed this citation because, after reading through the source material, I cannot seem to find any reference to Trithereon.  --Muna (talk) 03:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Four Gods of Greyhawk citation 

message: Since Trithereon is a personal interest of mine, today I located and added more content and their matching citations and edited them into the page.  Hopefully this makes his profile significantly more complete than it was prior.  I also added a "citation needed" tag to confirm if he was totally absent from 4E.  SquirrellyOtter (talk) 21:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Located and Updated Content and Citations
Talk:Vault of the Drow

message: I propose to remove the request for additional citations and external links.  It is not clear to me why such a request has been made by Gavin.collins as the subject matter of this article, being in the nature of a publication of a work of fiction, should be entirely self-referencing.  The best source material is surely the work of fiction itself.
I also propose to remove the query regarding notability as Gavin.collins has not made it clear why this article lacks notability when compared with any of the other TSR AD&D module articles included within the scope of the WikiProject Dungeons & Dragons and The World of Greyhawk WikiProject.--Calabraxthis 07:48, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations, external links and notability
Talk:White Plume Mountain

message: - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 23:26, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice! -Drilnoth (talk) 02:04, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great ref 

message: "... it's up to them to them to "bride" their Dungeon Master to keep them."
What does "bride" mean here? Hekerui (talk) 00:43, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And I was thinking that could mean something lol Hekerui (talk) 01:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "bride" 

message: According to RPGnet, there is a review of the module in The Space Gamer #37 (1981), if anyone is able to get a copy of that. 71.194.32.252 (talk) 02:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 06:23, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ref 

message: The article notes that there was a v.3.5 update for Return to White Plume Mountain on the Wizards of the Coast website. However, I can't find anything to support that claim. Is there a link for such a page that can be added to this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alzrius (talk • contribs) 15:00, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Return to White Plume Mountain 3.5? 

message: This adventure was recently added to the video game Dungeons & Dragons Online. Not sure if worth mentioning, or how. Might be interesting for fans. Cru121 (talk) 11:28, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like it would be worth mentioning! 73.168.15.161 (talk) 11:54, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Games based on WPM
Talk:Xan Yae

message: I just went through and did some clean up. I combined a number of very short sections (1 or 2 sentences) into longer ones, and tried to write it more from an out-of-universe perspective than from the (previously) in-universe perspective. This wasn't that hard, since I've never played Greyhawk, but as a result, some of the details might be more ambiguous or incorrect. If anyone spots something wrong, please fix it. Thanks. --OldManInACoffeeCan (talk) 00:42, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems fine to me. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup, etc
Talk:Tsuyokiss

message: It might be worth marking somehow what is based on the anime and what is based on the game.
I think someone told me that "Sunao Konoe" does only appear in the anime, but I have no idea if that is correct. The anime also makes it hard for Otome and Leo to "surprisingly" be cousins, as they are both already at school for a while... SilentGuy 21:34, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? 

message: I propose merging artcles Sunao Konoe, Leo Tsushima, Nagomi Yashi and Erika Kiriya to this article because each artcle is very short (WP:MM) and each character of Tsuyokiss is not major character (WP:FICT).--Mujaki 17:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Byzantine Rite

message: Andy Warhol says "Warhol was a practicing Byzantine Rite Catholic ". 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Warhol#Religious_beliefs 
I'd like to link Byzantine Rite Catholic, but I'm not sure where it should direct. Anybody? Thanks. (Crossposted to Talk:Eastern Catholic Churches ) -- Writtenonsand 15:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I presume he belonged to the Byzantine Catholic Metropolitan Church of Pittsburgh, part of the Ruthenian Catholic Church.  Lima 15:48, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Byzantine Rite Catholic" in [[Andy Warhol]] 

message: The Latin Church uses the Latin Vulgate Holy Bible - which Bible do the Byzantines use?
::: I assume the Greek text of the NT (the original language) , about OT, I don't know, mayebe the LXX.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaniloVilicic (talk • contribs) 06:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Official Bible Standard for Greeks

message: There's no need IMO to leave the latin without some sort of translation for clarity. I just edited in a parenthetical "autonomous" to explain what sui iuris means though it would also be acceptable to provide the literal "of their own laws" if autonomous is not acceptable to other editors TMLutas (talk) 17:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, "juris" is a genitive singular (the plural would be jurum) from a third declension noun, so it means "of its own right" or "of its own law." LacrimosaDiesIlla (talk) 12:01, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  sui iuris 
Talk:Slinger High School

message: This article uses several words that make it read like an advertisement.  Those words are "outstanding," "notable," and "well-known."  In addition, this article makes several claims about the sports and and athletic teams that need sources. --Andymarek 13:39, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an advertisement 
Talk:John Boyes (musician)

message: I'm guessing that the SRNuttall who copywrote much of the original material here, and the recent additions to the Frost article is the professional copywriter Sarah Nuttall - certainly reads that way - who clearly shares at least a working interest with John Boyes (q.v. Sarah Nutall links page).  This represents something of a conflict of interest (q.v. WP:VANITY).  Just a head's up...  
(Also posted to User talk:SRNuttall) Cain Mosni 16:49, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Conflict of interest
Talk:X-O Manowar

message: We currently have two "Valiant Entertainment Version" sections. They appear to cover the same fictional events, with minor differences. So which one should be deleted? --There are no names left (talk) 02:50, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character biography 