Talk:Walt Disney Pictures

message: Opening a discussion for discussing the split regarding the Disney logo article. IMHO the logo section in this article would be WP:UNDUE weight and therefor there should be a dedicated article about the logo, which also describes the logo of other Disney ventures. Also, the fact that it has been tagged with a template for indiscriminate information indicated that a split is not a bad idea. PhotographyEdits (talk) 21:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Splitting to Disney logo 

message: Currently, there is a section regarding PG-13 rated films released by Walt Disney Pictures. I personally do not see the significance of including this as a featured section and so I removed it, only for it to have been restored again by another user. Instead, I have tagged the section and decided to open up a discussion so we can openly talk about inclusion. The only important detail I see in all of it is that Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl was the first film released by Walt Disney Pictures to receive a PG-13 rating, which is important enough to mention as it was widely reported upon release. Everything else is just trivial and irrelevant. Walt Disney Pictures has now released even more PG-13 films since the first Pirates with greater frequency, which diminishes the unique benchmark set by the first Pirates film. It is now just as irrelevant as any of the other film studios that release PG-13 films. Why does this studio need a featured list that will only keep growing in time? If anything, a mention of how the studio has never released an R-rated film is more befitting. Also, MPA ratings are used only in the United States and Canada, as international territories use completely different content rating systems and yet those are not mentioned here. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 17:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Pinging other active users. @Trivialist @Favre1fan93 @PhotographyEdits @LTPHarry @The Grid @Nevodan30 @Ctrlwiki ~ Jedi94
I think we should remove it, but like you said, keep a mention for how PotC:TCotBP was the first to receive the rating. It would be different if Disney rarely did PG-13 films under the Walt Disney Pictures brand, but like you said, they are actually quite common nowadays. They were only on the page previously because back then, the section reflected the time, however this has changed since, and over time, it’s not uncommon to see Disney come out with a PG-13 release, especially those that are live-action, meaning that the section isn’t reflecting anything special and has ultimately become unnecessary. SlySabre (talk) 19:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

text: I agree with that. I think we should definitely keep the mention of how the first Pirates of the Caribbean film was the first WDP film to receive the rating and perhaps another line describing how WDP began to release more PG-13 films as a result of the success and lack of controversy from Pirates. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 19:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

text: , I see where you're coming from, but the reason why other studios don't have a PG-13 section is because most of their films are PG-13 and/or R (e.g., Paramount Pictures). ZX2006XZ (talk) 01:12, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @ZX2006XZ, by that logic, then all those other film studios should have similar sections featuring lists of G-rated or PG-rated films on their respective articles if it's so few for them. But they don't because it's not relevant. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 17:35, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  PG-13 films section 

message: A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:Walt Disney Pictures Logo as of 2022.ogv, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  InfiniteNexus (talk) 01:25, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  File:Walt Disney Pictures Logo as of 2022.ogv listed for discussion