Talk:Swarm intelligence

message: It is very interesting that I have been accused by the editor () that I have conflict of interest with the paper entitled Grey Wolf Optimizer. It seems you have no idea about the field that this algorithm has been cited more than 110 times in the literature and this evidently shows that this algorithm has achieved the notability among other algorithms. Have a look here: https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?hl=en&q=grey+wolf+optimizer&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=
Okay I gave up and will never edit a page in Wikipedia since it seems that such pages are patrolling by non-expert who has written many articles in sea foods and biology !!! This is ridiculous. Now I feel why our lecturers keep saying that Wikipedia pages are not reliable at all. Because someone in the street from the seafood market can edit a page in Artificial Intelligence :))))))
: Okay, you are very enthusiastic about including the Grey Wolf Optimizer in the article. According to Google Scholar,  there are currently about 164,000 academic publications referring to particle swarm optimization, 59,500 to ant colony optimization, 9,340 to artificial bee colony algorithm and 4,680 to self-propelled particles. By contrast, there are just 162 references to the grey wolf optimizer, and a number of these references occur in papers written by the authors of the algorithm. It may become apparent in a couple of years that this very recent algorithm is a significant contribution to swarm intelligence, but that time has not arrived yet. Your personal attacks are irrelevant to the issue. You have in fact no idea what my background is, and your speculations could hardly be further off target. Of course Wikipedia should not be cited as a reliable source. The reason is that anyone can have just made an inappropriate edit to any Wikipedia article that has not yet been corrected... such as, for example, an over-enthusiastic beginning student trying to spam research by his or her professor onto Wikipedia. --Epipelagic (talk) 15:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  What about Glowworm swarm optimization. Have a look here a184. It seems that you have conflict of interest with this paper because it is not notable and you have not removed it yet. Undoubtedly, PSO, ACO, and GA should be there but not this algorithm and a couple more unless you want them to be there. It is easy to accuse someone in Wikipedia and I refer you to Please do not bite the newcomers article. I went through you talk page and noticed you have offended many people here since 2008 unfortunately. One of them clearly mentioned in 2008 that "who do you think you are?". Their comments are still in your talk page if you want to delete them. People are different you know and you are the one who requires others to attack your "reflected" personality. To me, you are the only reason that why I will never edit a page in Wikipedia. Have fun with your Wikipedia it seems its it is not that public that I have been told.
The editor is right in removing GWO many years ago and Seyedali Mirjalili comments here, because, in 2020, it is proven that there is no novelty in GWO, and it just based on SPSO-2011 and velocity free PSOs and "self-organizing hierarchical PSO with time-varying acceleration coefficients" HPSO-TVAC method.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.82.9.123 (talk) 17:40, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Grey wolf optimizer

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Swarm intelligence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.iam.ubc.ca/~lukeman/fish_school_f.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101124132227/http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2008/0406-planes_trains_and_ant_hills.htm to http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2008/0406-planes_trains_and_ant_hills.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Perhaps a subject bar should be added instead of a long See Also list? Spannerjam (talk) 10:22, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject bar 

message: The link to a Dutch article leads to an article about AI swarm intelligence, not swarm intelligence in general. X10 (talk) 13:23, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Dutch 

message: This article begins  while the Colins English Dictionary defines swarm intelligence as having the possible meaning of  . From this one might reasonably infer that this article would contain a discussion of social insects. However, there is not a single reference to natural swarms in the article itself (outside of the lede). As such I suggest the article be expanded or renamed. ~ El D. (talk to me) 00:50, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article mistitled 

message: — Assignment last updated by UndercoverSwitch (talk) 03:32, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: IFS213-Hacking and Open Source Culture