lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Michael I of Wallachia

message: I found nothing here about Michael 1 but had read that he had defeated the Turks and then died against them in battle. I feel every historic person should have their story told or at least as much as we know of them so I did an edit which came from the main topic of Wallachia found on Wikipedia. 
There must be more known about this ruler somewhere and I hope someone will eventually reply to add more to the page about him. (Armorbeast (talk) 20:55, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Arnold Ross

message: Article needs to be broken into sections before a "C" class, or higher, is given. Otherwise it needs to remain at "start". Maybe a section on "Early life", "Education", and "Career", etc. Pknkly (talk) 14:51, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article class rating

message: The sources conflict somewhat on the title of Ross's dissertation and the spelling of Bee's name. I went with what I thought was best verified, but if you find a better source, please do pass it along. czar ♔ 18:41, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: With the dissertation, I went with the one that was published later but appears to have been argued sooner (1929), which is also the one cited to be his dissertation by the footnoted source. With Bee, the current spelling is the one also used by OSU in his obituary, so I'm going to rule the one source that differs as an anomaly. czar ♔ 14:29, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dissertation and wife's name
Talk:You've Never Seen Everything

message: The link itself isn't dead. It goes to the latest page of the reviews archive. However, there is no content there. There is no June 23, 2003 review on the Rolling Stone site. There is a June 9 review of an Elvis Presley album and June 18 reviews of R.E.M. and Black Eyed Peas. There is no result in searching the website. There is no indication there was ever any content there. I'll leave things as is for right now, in case there is a reply to this. Otherwise, after a reasonable time, I will remove all references to it. Holford (talk) 05:02, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a deadlink. It redirects to a different location because the review has been removed. You will leave things as they are forever unless you can find a current link on the site (I couldn't which is why I added the deadlink tag) or an archived version at someplace like wayback machine. If no ref can be found, it's perfectly acceptable to leave it since the media was also in print. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:12, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolling Stone link
Talk:Moisi Golemi

message: The nobility infobox contains information about occupation of the noble people. If somebody was noble that does not mean they could not have an occupation. Unless nobody presents valid reason for removal information about occupation of Golem within reasonable time period I will return it to the infobox.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Being a noble it is not an occupation. Moisi Golemi had his own man in arms and acted independently in his domains. It was only during the battles that he joined Scanderbeg. It is like saying that Vlatko Vuković occupation was commander of Tvrtko I of Bosnia. It simply does not make sense to have an occupation column for such figures Aigest (talk) 10:09, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Your comment actually supports my position. You are of course right that being a noble is not an occupation. That is exactly why there is additional field in the infobox for occupation of noble person.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The subject is meaningless even as a debate issue. Noblemen fought, but that's not an occupation and readers can find the same details on the lead, so don't clog the infobox unnecessarily.--— ZjarriRrethues — talk 11:37, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't fully agree with you. In case of some noble people who administered their countries you are maybe right. Every medieval emperor, king or lord who administered his possessions had important administrative occupation which is incorporated in his noble position. That is not the case with noble people whose noble position is predominantly based on their occupation. Like in case of military commanders who served their feudal lords for money, like Golem did. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Occupation 

message: @Aigest, you wrote that Golemi "was a feudal lord on his own" when you removed his occupation from the infobox. Will you please clarify what the territory ruled by Moisi Arianit Golemi and was the name of his country?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 14:27, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Diber region. Lord of both Upper and Lower Diber link. That is how he is described. Aigest (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your reply. Will you please be so kind to check when exactly he was lord of the Diber region and what was the name of his lordship?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 08:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lordship of Golemi 

message: *"Moisi Golemi" (49)
*"Mojsi Golemi" (12)
*"Moisiu i Dibrës" (12)
*"Moses Golemi" (5)
*"Mois Golemi" (5)
*"Moises Golemi" (4)
*"Mojs Golemi" (4)
Gbook hits.--Zoupan 21:17, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: There is no historical evidence, that he was born in the city of modern Debar. What we know is, that he was born in the Dibër region, which is broader, than the city of Debar. The Dibër region is in modern Albania and North Macedonia. Squatrazustradin (talk) 07:52, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of birth
Talk:Murchadh Ó Cuindlis

message: He's also credited with  AKA  in or just before 1400 AD, and examined by Mícheál Ó Cléirigh (Michael O'Clery) at Quin Friary in 1621. This is not to be confused with , which is later.  ALRM may also be the , ('true-red book', distinguished from a  'ruddy, reddish' volume), "which contained genealogical tracts of some antiquity", as described by Friar Antonius Bruodinus in the 1630s at the library (presumably monastic) in Moynoe, Co. Clare.  I have no idea yet whether WP has any material anywhere about this work (e.g., whether there is some page or section or list entry to link to when mentioning it).
Sources:
*  – where I got most of that from.
*  - on the distinctions between the books with similar names; the relevant material is available in the free preview at the URL.
 — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  02:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've integrated this material into the article.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  03:02, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A third work 

message: The statement "in what is now the extreme south of County Galway" appears to be wrong, and there doesn't seem to be a source for it among the sources we have on hand. Another I found  has our "Bally Lough Deacker" as modern Ballaghdacker (Irish: , of which "Bally Lough Deacker" is clearly an anglicization, also occuring as "Ballyloughdacker", etc.). That is  in the parish of Athleague, which straddles north (not south) Galway and south Roscommon. Athleague is  a civil parish in the barony of Killian, in Galway; and a civil parish and townland in the barony of Athlone North and diocese of Elphin, on the Roscommon side. Not sure what the diocese is on the Galway side.
So, unless someone's got evidence there's another "Bally Lough Deacker" in south Galway and that Ó Cuindlis was from there, I think the article needs correcting.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  07:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  14:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Location
Talk:Nawojka

message: Female students where not allowed until 1897, but according to one of the cited links, they where individual exceptions made before women in general where allowed to attend- such exceptions are known from other universitites in Europe too, such as the cases of Christina Roccati and Charlotta Liljeroth, who also studied opnely as women before it was really allowed for women in general. Here is the citation from the link: 
In 16th the century, women were not allowed to study at Krakow University which was started in 1399 by a bequest to the school by Queen Jadwiga of all her personal property including her jewelry. Other ladies supported the school too including Princess Aleksandra Mazowicka, her daughter, Anna Maziowicka, Konstancja Konipolska Katarzyna z Dábrowy, Małgorzata z Pokrzywnicy, Joanna Gniewoscowska, Katarzyna Méźkowa, and Elz?bieta Helsztyźska. Later rich urban ladies such as Katarzyna a Urszula Homan also supported the school. In the 16th century as a reward for her support, Queen Anna Jagiellonka was given the title of honorary student. The first woman who had the title was a widow of Krakow pub owner, Zofia Gokowa. She attended the university in the years 1580-1581. Later her example was followed by Zofia Zweirzowa, Barbara, wife of shoemaker Marciej Opatowczyka, and others.
 
I 'm not quite sure how to understand it, if this could be counted or not, but I thought it sounded interesting, and as it belongs to the same subject, perhaps it could have it's place in the article? Just a suggestion!--85.226.235.178 (talk) 09:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other female students? 
Talk:Nguyễn Trãi

message: Most Vietnamese in the Hanoi area supported Ming rule, it was the semi barbarian "Trai" or "camp" people in Thanh hoa who supported Le Loi's rebellion. Nguyen Trai stood as the exception, being one of the few from Hanoi who supported the rebellion, while his fellow Vietnamese in Hanoi supported the Ming
http://books.google.com/books?id=P2HP31kOSA4C&pg=PA186&dq=trai+people&hl=en&sa=X&ei=sr5JUtDqGJHi9gTsyYGoAg&ved=0CEgQ6wEwAw#v=onepage&q=trai%20people&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=P2HP31kOSA4C&pg=PA191&dq=kinh+people+of+capital&hl=en&sa=X&ei=g7xJUs2iMoO48wSzq4GYBg&ved=0CEwQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=kinh%20people%20of%20capital&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=P2HP31kOSA4C&pg=PA210#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=P2HP31kOSA4C&pg=PA177#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=P2HP31kOSA4C&pg=PA182#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=P2HP31kOSA4C&pg=PA191#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=P2HP31kOSA4C&pg=PA186#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=P2HP31kOSA4C&pg=PA5#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=P2HP31kOSA4C&pg=PA113#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://books.google.com/books?id=-01JisWpJbEC&pg=PA377&dq=A+history+of+the+vietnamese+muong+trai&hl=en&sa=X&ei=3stUUtmBHKjk4AO-4oCoAQ&ved=0CEIQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=A%20history%20of%20the%20vietnamese%20muong%20trai&f=false
North and South in Binh Ngo Dai Cao might have referred to internal divisions in Vietnam (Hanoi vs Thanh Hoa) rather than China vs Vietnam
https://www.lib.washington.edu/SouthEastAsia/vsg/elist_2010/Question%20about%20Binh%20Ngo%20Dai%20Cao.html
Some Chinese stayed in Vietnam after Le Loi's revolt and even formed a unit in the Le Dai Viet army. Le Loi was a Muong and many of his followers were also non-Vietnamese ethnic minorities.
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/248395427_The_Ming_factor_and_the_Emergence_of_the_Viet_in_the_15th_century
Pages 83-103
Page 95-96
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Tana_Li/publication/248395427_The_Ming_factor_and_the_Emergence_of_the_Viet_in_the_15th_century/file/60b7d51df84438389a.pdf
Rajmaan (talk) 12:59, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Niccolò de' Niccoli

message: The purpose of this information is to provide connections of Niccolo de' Niccoli to Poggio Bracciolini, and the alleged forgery of Tacitus and other works by the hand of Poggio, as is considered by Hochart and Ross, who wrote about the forgery in the 19th century CE as well as infomation which can be found within the Fomenko books.  For more information about their proofs, a selected group of sites can be seen at;
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4ADBR_enUS315US315&q=hochart+and+ross
More information can be found in Chapter I, "History: Fiction or Science?, Vol. I", p. 26-26.69.92.23.64 (talk) 14:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nicolaus Zacharie

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; if media (images and/or sound) were added, it might make A.  A GA review might founder on the lack of inline citations; although the length of the article plays in favor of an argument against the need. Read my review on the comments page; questions and comments can be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 13:44, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Associated Grammar Schools of Victoria

message: More references are required by the members of these schools who made this page or perhaps deletion. Ray-Rays 21:06, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: More References

message: Hi everyone,
Looking over the revision history, there seems to have been some dispute regarding the abbreviations for the Member Schools. I know that the schools use their own abbreviations that in some cases are different to ones used on this page (e.g. Ivanhoe Grammar refers to themselves as IGS, however this page abbreviates them to IVAN). However, when I added this parameter to the table I was going off the abbreviations that the AGSV uses, not what the schools use. This page is about the AGSV, not the individual schools, so I think the AGSV's opinion on this matter is more important. Whovian99 (talk) 00:25, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Abbreviations of Schools
Talk:Oddantonio da Montefeltro

message: As of the date I type this, the article contains "He also sought the support of their arch-enemies, the Malatesta, seemingly reaching a complete independence from them." To whom does the pronoun "their" refer? It can't be his own arch-enemies, because those from whom one seeks support are not one's enemies. Nor would they support one in one's efforts to reach "a complete independence from them". Either a sentence that would cause this to make sense got deleted, or there's a problem with translating a preposition "against" as "of" (because prepositions are somewhat arbitrary in so many languages), or there's some thing else (bad) afoot.2600:1700:6759:B000:F9C8:CB18:D28B:C1EA (talk) 19:35, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation problem?
Talk:Paolo dal Pozzo Toscanelli

message: Article states that: 
Toscanelli had miscalculated the size of the earth which resulted in Columbus not realizing initially he had found a new continent.
Elsewhere, in reliable sources, I have read that Columbus died believing he had discovered India -- However, I dont have time to track down the references.
Asaduzaman (talk) 00:49, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Columbus Never Found Out --
Talk:Associated Catholic Colleges

message: This article contained copyrighted school logo's that their use in this article doesnt comply with the Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria sections 3, 8 10 of this policy and have been removed.  Gnangarra 02:16, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: School Logos
Talk:Euthymius of Tarnovo

message: A story I have heard about Patriarch Evtimii says, that he was sentenced to death by the Ottoman invaders.
But when the henchman lifted the ax to cut the head of Patriarch Evtimii, his hands stoned.
The death penalty was transfered into exile.
Does anyone know, if this is true, and what source the information comes from.
Thanks, Nick
:I think that comes from a work of Gregory Tsamblak and, of course, cannot be true : ) --Gligan (talk) 08:52, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This story is described by Tsamblak and other writers from that time. I have personally read Tsamblak's description of the fall of  Tarnovo. 
I don`t think that it is sound to automatically assume that this did not happen. The document points out a fact: the hand of the executor was paralyzed. The fact was interpreted as a miracle of God. 
You might dispute interpretations but facts should not be dismissed that easily.
I think this should be included in the article.
It follows 100% the most basic principle of history: If there is a document there is history.
I agree, please add this to the article. It is a rather important part of the events surrounding the life of Evtimiiy as well as the fall of Tarnovo.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.94.229.85 (talk) 01:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The miracle with Evtimii's death sentence 

message: I added a few of patriarch Evtimii's written works that survived (in original or as later transcripts)
I will attempt to collect some more and if possible to add their texts as related articles.
We need to add more info on the works of Evtimii and the Tarnovo literary school.... I think.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bajanak (talk • contribs) 19:23, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written works
Talk:Lake Worth Independent School District

message: Most of the information provided currently in this page is extremely unnecessary, such as land purchases and continual petitioning of the government to redirect AFB flights. Assistance will be appreciated to help clean up this article. Smileguy91 (talk) 21:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Unnecessary information
Talk:Perkin Warbeck

message: The date of his confession is clearly incorrect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.25.30.54 (talk) 13:48, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Why does the infobox on this page currently claim "Monarchy abolished" in 1485 ?Eregli bob (talk) 17:36, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm, good question - I suspect the infobox can't cope with a pretender where the monarchy is continuing. DuncanHill (talk) 21:32, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well spotted! I've dealt with this.Butcherscross (talk) 16:59, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Monarchy abolished?

message: In the Netherlands? Ghent perhaps? Because the duchy of Burgundy was under French rule for good since 1477 and the Free County the same up to the mid-1490s. Dijon was no longer the Burgundian capital.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.85.148.202 (talk) 17:38, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  And where was the court of Burgundy in 1490? 

message: At the moment we have this in the "Imprisonment and death" section: "Allegedly, the two tried to escape in 1499." I always find allegedly a weird thing to stumble over in Wikipedia and perhaps even more so in a historical article. It seems like it might be a bit of a shorthand or cop-out. Who is alleging this? Is it sourced? It just seems ... odd. If you take away "allegedly" then you end up with a simple sentence that should be in or out, depending on whether it has an RS or not. Similarly, if what we mean is "According to the near-contemporary account of Sir Fred Smith the two tried to escape in 1499" then we should say it, and again it needs an RS for where Fred is quoted alleging this. Ahem, or not. But the current version just seems a bit ... hmmmmm. Or is it just me? Cheers 138.37.199.206 (talk) 13:10, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah yes, WP:ALLEGED helps a bit here. (It doesn't like it.) :) 138.37.199.206 (talk) 13:12, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I've taken out the inappropriate (I'm trying to be polite here!) "allegedly" and made it into a simple statement - which is challenged by the "unreffed" tag I've also added... hmmm. Best wishes to all 138.37.199.206 (talk) 11:00, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allegedly? 

message: Do records exist of a place of burial ? Given the recent rediscovery and identification of Richard III, the true identity of "Warbeck" could be established if his bones could be located. RGCorris (talk) 15:22, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial ? 

message: The redirect Peter Ure has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:44, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Peter Ure]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Fairbanks

message: *The "Pedophile's Paradise"
To be added when time permits. / edg ☺ ☭ 16:23, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incoming references
Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Juneau

message: Would it be accurate to call this the smallest Catholic diocese in the United States? If so, perhaps we could include that. KBurchfiel (talk) 07:23, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It was until it was merged out of existance Dcheney (talk) 12:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Smallest Diocese?
Talk:Coin board

message: This article consists almost entirely of unattributed quotes from .  If I could, I would delete the article. 67.158.75.233 00:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening heading

message: Confused by this article partly due to seal being used I think to describe a hidden ticket such as linked to by the pull tab. It was in category board game and I am moving it to gambling terminology but I still have concerns as to its relevance I thought when I saw the title it meant a board game played with coinsTetron76 (talk) 12:01, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: board game term?

message: This article is about two separate items. I believe it should be split in two with a disambiguation page created to link them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaguar83 (talk • contribs) 07:15, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It had become three separate subjects by 2022. Since the article was originally about the gambling game and the other additions came later, I've made a WP:CONTENTSPLIT to Coin board (collecting) and Telephone switchboard#Operation. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split and disambiguation
Talk:Petrus de Domarto

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; with modest effort it could be A or GA class; read my review on the comments page.  Questions and comments can be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 17:29, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review