lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Operation Donnerschlag

message: The break-out by the ships of the Brest Group had six different code names during various planning stages in an effort to confuse any adversary; the final German admiralty plan and the actual operation was “Operation Cerberus.” “Donnerschlag” may have been one of these code names, but a Naval “Donnerschlag” in connection with “Operation Cerberus” is not identified in the literature.
The British effort to prevent the break-out and return of the German ships to their home bases was code-named “Fuller.” Various sub-operations, “Stopper,” “Habo,” “Line SE,” and “Jim Crow” were part of “Fuller.” None were effective.
Operation Donnerschlag as a major German Naval enterprise is doubtful.--Gamahler 04:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The original wiki page ‘Operation Donnerschlag’ is a verbatim regurgitation from the All Experts Encyclopedia.  No statement of sources either in official histories or literature is given.  Both references, Army and Naval, as currently stated, are in conflict with other relevant Wikipedia pages.--Gamahler 17:07, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Based on data from the limited Operation Cerberus literature, there was no Naval Operation Donnerschlag in the final plan and subsequent fleet movement known as Operation Cerberus.  Will modify references to the Naval Donnerschlag.--Gamahler 00:08, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naval Donnerschlag?
Talk:Fire services in France

message: Shouldn't we count also the Sécurité Civile, made up of both civilian and military personnel? Don't they have large scale firefighting means? David.Monniaux 22:07, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sécurité civile 

message: The Sapeurs-pompiers are the firefighters in Switzerland and Belgium too, not only in France ! This article should be renamed or modified. 81.62.67.34 (talk) 11:37, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose of this article 

message: Les pompier sont les meilleure car il combatte ensamble il gerice les gens avec les vsab ou vsav vsab qui veu dire vheicule secour aux blesse est vsav vheicule secour aux victime fpt fourgon pompe tonne  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E34:EEDE:6020:4945:54E:C2A5:C38C (talk) 14:01, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  pompier
Talk:Takizawa Bakin

message: There was a mixup between Bakin's pen name and actual name, which I've fixed. I've also poked a few other bits, but have a question. The ja.wikip page on the hakkenden novel uses the modern 伝 character, but the novel itself uses the old 傳 source, which would be correct when giving the title in japanese? --zippedmartin 22:15, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Solved it by writing an article on the book, and giving both trad and simplified titles. I'd not noticed the 總/総 switch anyway, fonts too small... --zippedmartin 00:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've seen this page been changed back and forth between Kyokutei and Bakin. Various reasons have been given. One in particular was WP:NAMES#Subsequent_uses_of_names. However, Kyokutei was not his surname and I have tried to clarify this point. It was Takizawa. Modern scholarship generally refers to him as Takizawa Bakin or more commonly just as Bakin. Kyokutei by itself just does not seem natural. Whatever the argument, I think WP:IAR may be most applicable here. Bendono 14:00, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That MoS section takes pseudonyms into account already: For people who are best known by a pseudonym, they shall be referred to by their pseudonym surname, ....  Having said that, I definitely don't feel strong about it; just fixing what was broke (according to the MoS).  If there is a feeling that it ain't broke (despite the MoS), that's a separate matter.  This discussion is a good place to start. Neier 15:19, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kyokutei or Bakin 

message: A Google search for "Kiong te Bakin" reveals this author has been mentioned in a myriad American newspapers under this name. It's also how I came to be here. Should this be mentioned? I'm not familiar with Japanese customs, so perhaps "kiong te" simply means "the author"? Thanks. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 18:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kiong te Bakin
Talk:List of NFL champions (1920–1969)

message: 1935 game reads play at Titan Stadium
 states the U of Detroit Stadium was the name of the stadium the Lions used. Is Titan stadium a different stadium? Smith03 16:09, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :List of NFL champions. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 16#List of NFL champions until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "List of NFL champions" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Viperidae

message: Proteolytic enzymes do not degrade lipids or DNA--just proteins. --209.180.218.156 05:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proteolytic enzymes

message: The etymology vivo pario is very suspect. In ancient Roman times the animal was already known as vipera.
:It's possible. But, as you can see, we have a reasonable reference for the current explanation and it sounds plausible to me. If you have a better one -- with a reference -- then you're welcome to add it. --Jwinius (talk) 01:02, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: Can some indication be put, as to which species have horns?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.34.190.26 (talk) 09:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horned snakes 

message: 'The name "viper" is derived from the Latin word, vipera, -ae, which means "viper".'
I can't help but feel like this needs to be revised, as it is very redundant.Nighthawk418 (talk) 04:56, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Viper=Viper
Talk:Martha Ballard

message: Moved contribution from article.  Kind of fun, but not particularly relavant to the reader.  Information on how/why the parody was created might make it more appropriate.
: *Parody of Ballard's diary
WBardwin 22:58, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parody 

message: — Assignment last updated by HannahKingsb (talk) 20:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Women in the Atlantic World
Talk:Steve Perry

message: This might sound like a really strange question. I mean, everyone knows that Perry was brought in for the Infinity album. I’ve known the Next album since it was released, but lately I’ve become convinced that both he and Greg Rolie are singing on the title track. There seem to be two voices on it, and for one of them, the vocalisation is Perry all over.  There’s a YouTube post of the band (with Perry) performing the track live, in 1978, and the vocals sound very similar to the recorded work.  https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LruCzETf0mk  </br>If anyone knows the answer or has a link…(I’ve spent a long time searching) Boscaswell talk 05:07, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I verified the printed credits (there are several pictures of the record's innersleeve on Discogs), and they all confirm that Gregg Rolie and Neal Schon share lead vocals on the album, while Ross Valory provides background vocals. For Next, Gregg obviously handles lead vocals, and for me, it can only be one of the three previously mentioned on background vocals, most likely Ross. 2A02:8429:515A:CE01:31C7:9A33:1B7A:753E (talk) 16:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vocals on Journey's Next album’s title track 

message: How long did Steve perry date sherry 2601:1C2:580:17A0:3000:54A7:423A:19C9 (talk) 23:41, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: They dated for 6 yrs, from 1980 to 1986. AngelNelz (talk) 10:04, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sherry
Talk:Room a Thousand Years Wide

message: What time signatures is "Room a Thousand Years Wide" in? 38.118.23.20 (talk) 12:12, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Time signatures
Talk:Mohammed Haydar Zammar

message: Under the section "An al-Qaida recruiter" there is an un-referenced sentence stating that on Sept. 11, 2001 Mr. Mohammed Zammer was living in Boston.  This should have a source. I did note that I found in another reference on this page  that it states he was living in Germany at the time. Having that only other source reference doesn't help me to conclusively state where he was living at the time it does make me question the un-cited Boston statement.  The sentence about leaving shortly after Sept. 11 should also be referenced.
Several sentences within this same paragraph seem to be strongly biased or libellous and should either be cited or removed.  Ed M isnot edm (talk) 09:34, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Lacking Citations and noting possible biased material
Talk:Brian Randle

message: Or probably - just by his tone - a mixed-race? I have been literally indecisive and still am as on whether to add :Category:African-American basketball players to the article, a list where he's currently absent. Just can't be certain about the accuracy 5.102.215.167 (talk) 11:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is he an African-American? 
Talk:Irwin Schiff

message: Irwin Schiff was not convicted in 2004 for tax evasion.  He was charged back then and is undergoing the trial right now.  
From my memory of reading his book, he WAS convicted back in the 80's and served jail-time.  But not in 2004.  Please correct.  Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.127.124.134 (talk) 20:43, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have another correction to make
Talk:United States (disambiguation)

message: How many countries are federations of states?
Germany, Australia, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, ... ?
They do not all have the words "United States" in their names.  
Are they all more recent than the USA, or was there a federation of states before 1789? (I have heard of arguments that the Indian tribes, or some of them, were federations) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.169.222.56 (talk) 00:25, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a list on Federation. Not just states  -- can also be provinces (Canada), cantons, regions, etc. –Hajor 00:49, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federal states 

message: May I suggest that a search for United States takes you to this page, rather than a page about The United States of America. 
If you search for US you get the US (disambiguation) page. Mr Taz 10:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route to this page 

message: Cleanup is required - these aren't all known as "United States"! - maybe split the list of partial match countries into a list article? Widefox; talk 09:14, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup

message: Originally, the term was considered a plural, and simply referred to the states that make up the republic.  For example, the Declaration of Independence says "these united states are and of right ought to be..."
It didn't begin to refer to the union as whole, and take a singular verb ("is", rather than "are") until the Civil War.47.139.43.80 (talk) 03:43, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: No. The Civil War didn't result in a new country being formed. It's simply a change in grammar rules and perspective, not essence. - BilCat (talk) 08:04, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the meanings in "the united states are" and "the United States is" be considered two different meanings?
Talk:Maximum a posteriori estimation

message: The maximum a posteriori estimation method is equivalent to the minimum description length principle, perhaps the article could mention that. 134.184.26.154 (talk) 10:32, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: MAP is equivalent to MDL

message: The page says: "The method of maximum a priori estimation then estimates θ as the mode of the posterior..."
Should it read, "The method of maximum a POSTERIORI estimation then estimates θ as the mode of the posterior..."?
:Absolutely, that was a lapse brought about by the fact that maximum a posteriori incorporates a prior. Thanks for pointing that out. By the way: When you feel that a change is needed to an article, it would be best to go ahead and make it yourself.  Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone is able to edit an article by following the  link. You do not even need to log in, although there are some reasons why you might like to.  
:Wikipedia convention is to be bold.  You do not need to be afraid of making mistakes.  If you are not sure how editing works, have a look at How to edit a page, or try out the Sandbox to test your editing skills.  New contributors are always welcome. Cheers, --MarkSweep 02:03, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: a priori

message: shouldn't it read:
:\pi(\mu) L(\mu) =  \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \sigma_m} \exp\left(-\frac{1}{2} \left(\frac{\mu}{\sigma_m}\right)^2\right) \prod_{j=1}^n \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi} \sigma_v} \exp\left(-\frac{1}{2} \left(\frac{x_j - \mu}{\sigma_v}\right)^2\right),
Mantepse (talk) 10:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example 

message: I don't understand this, and if I understand it, it's a bad example: 
:As an example of the difference between Bayesian methods and using an MAP estimate, consider the case where we need to classify inputs x as either positive or negative (for example, loans as risky or safe). Suppose there are just three possible hypotheses about the correct method of classification h_1, h_2 and h_3 with posteriors 0.4, 0.3 and 0.3 respectively. Suppose given a new instance, x, h_1 classifies it as positive, whereas the other two classify it as negative. Using the MAP estimate for the correct classifier h_1, we classify x as positive, whereas the Bayesian would average over all hypotheses and classify x as negative.
What do that posteriors mean? 
If it's no coincidence that they add up to 1, are they the probabilities of the respective methods being "the correct method"? In that case, why are they called "posteriors"? And also, how could one know these probabilities? In this case I would look for a more practically likely example. 
If it's a coincidence that their sum is 1, are they the probabilities of the prediction of the respective method being correct? This data is very likely available, but why are they smaller than 0,5? Is this data enough for a Bayesian analysis? This is an interesting problem, but I don't see a connection with MAP estimation. 
Marcosaedro (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference between Bayesian methods and MAP estimate
Talk:Flip Saunders

message: Does anyone have any biographical info (i.e. childhood that kind of thing) Xunflash 00:57, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Speedy (DC Comics)

message: The Earth 2 Green Arrow died during Crisis on Infinite Earths. Did Earth 2 Speedy meet the same fate? I don't see any mention of his specific origin in post. It seems like his and Earth 1's Speedy are combined. Jackbox1971 06:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Earth 2 Speedy?''' 

message: The truth? I liked the other animated image better. -- Andromeda 01:20, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The truth? 

message: I've heard in a recent episode of Justice League Unlimited that aired in the UK that Speedy appeared along with the other Seven Soldiers of Victory. Should this be noted?
He certainly did appear on JLU, the episode titled Patriot Games. He appeared as a "reserve member" when no on else could located to help Green Arrow, Star Spangled Kid, S.T.R.I.P.E, Vigilante and Shining Knight. Speedy arrived with the Crimson Avenger... so the 7 Soliders were all there (though CA did very little and he was in his pre- 7SoV costume... and no Wing. This should probably be noted in the entry for the 7SoV rather than Speedy. It is interesting that this is the only character from the Teen Titans to also appear on JLU (to my knowledge) Jackbox1971 06:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justice League Unlimited 

message: I'm going to move this to Speedy (comics).Brian Boru is awesome (talk) 14:35, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Explain why you think this needs to be moved to (comics). What other subject is there that is using a "Speedy (foo)" title that justifies this? - J Greb (talk) 15:20, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

text: Moving this title makes no sense.  Keep as is. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 22:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

text: I see it has been moved (which does make sense) but people will need to check through Special:WhatLinksHere/Speedy to make sure all the links have been updated. (Emperor (talk) 13:41, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy (comics)

message: - J Greb (talk) 00:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image issue 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: page moved to Speedy (DC Comics), instead of Speedy (DC Comics character). (closed by non-admin page mover)  —Nnadigoodluck███ 13:11, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Speedy (comics) →  – per WP:NCCDAB NeoBatfreak (talk) 05:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 19 November 2020
Talk:Stone of Tears

message: Jedidiah is the "best" wizard of the palace before Richard "joins". At the beginning it is said, that he loves and "ever" loved Sister Margo who was the novice caring for him. But at the same time he is the great love of Sister Verna? Did I mix them up or is there a strange error? I understand it, that he was a "good" boy over 20 years ago as Verna was still at the palace and was after that changed by the sisters of the dark. But how can he be "in deep love" with Margo and Verna at the same time when he was a "good boy".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.57.240.41 (talk) 21:54, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jedidiah
Talk:Principle of locality

message: I have new material for quantum locality issues, but it is hard to work into the current chronological outline. An alternative outline:
Principle of Locality
* History 
** current pre-quantum
** EPR, 
** Bell, 
** Modern (one paragraph summaries, no tech)
* Models of locality
** Action at a distance
** Bell screening
** Quantum wavefunction
*** Bell local hidden variables proof and consequences
** Field theory
*** Maxwell
*** QFT
** Local realism definitional issues.
The History section would contain most of the current article; action at a distance could be merged in there. This section would have no discussion of current issues beyond mentioning "ongoing research".  A causal reader might drop off here.
The later section would be more technical and mention unsettled aspects of locality and issues of definitions. Johnjbarton (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me.--ReyHahn (talk) 22:03, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New outline?
Talk:Cyclone (programming language)

message: Anyone know how Cyclone compares with MISRA C? --Rebroad 21:00, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: MISRA C is a set of guidlines, whereas  Cyclone is an entirely new language with safety from the ground up -- LiteStar Litestar (talk) 15:36, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MISRA C 

message: What does 'although' mean in the following sentence?
:Although Cyclone looks, in general, much like C, it should be thought of as a C-like language.
JadeNB (talk) 21:35, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: although means that even if it resembles C, thus looks almost like C, it's considered a seperate language and should be thought of as a C-like language. I'm non-native, hence I might have gotten it wrong ... 220.142.130.173 (talk) 20:43, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Although ... 
Talk:Inquiry education

message: I would vote against merging Inquiry_education with Inquiry-based_learning, because I believe there is a distinct difference between the two.  "Inquiry-based learning" refers to a guided process where students are presented with a specific problem and then expected to ask questions about the best way to solve them.  (Look at the examples cited  in the article.)  The Inquiry_education article, on the other hand, refers to to 'just' asking questions, rather than having students develop their own processes to solve them.  My impression is that Inquiry_education would be happy to simply talk about "how to build strong bridges" whereas Inquiry-based_learning requires that they develop a process themselves (note the article specifically states "Inquiry learning emphasizes constructivist ideas of learning." tom (talk) 21:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added Marshall McLuhan  as a link in the “see also” section.  McLuhan is relevant to this page because Postman and Weingartner discuss his theories in the “inquiry education” chapter of Teaching as a Subversive Activity.  They use the following of McLuahn’s ideas to communicate the way they would like readers to conceptualize the idea of inquiry learning:
* McLuahn’s “label-libel” idea, which states that we often “dismiss an idea by the expedience of naming it”.  Postman and Weingartner detail the way McLuhan develops this point by explaining his “massage” metaphor.   Massages are processes, and thus naming them does not really enhance our understanding of them.  Postman and Weingartner draw on this theory to help readers understand the necessity of holding off on labelling inquiry learning; by not labelling it, they hope it can be processed and discussed, and therefore more fully appreciated.
* McLuhan’s “rearview-mirror metaphor” which problematizes the way we tend to frame new media in the context of what we already know.  McLuhan argues that the rearview mirror approach is a “mistake” because new concepts (for example, the inquiry method) are actually completely new experiences.  By recognizing the rearview mirror idea, Postman and Weingartner try to prevent inquiry learning from being misinterpreted as just another way for teachers to use the same norms as before --mainly, “‘covering content’” rather than learning more deeply.
* McLuahn’s idea that we don’t need storylines.  McLuhan posits that storylines are distractors, and without them, people may become more involved in the process of learning.  Postman and Weingartner use this idea to stress that students do not learn in linear or even remotely logical ways, and they imply that their method accounts for and encourages this fact whereas other teaching styles, which use syllabi and other methods to impose storylines, do not.
Gerard3333 (talk) 21:58, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation of added link in "See also" section
Talk:Diadematidae

message: HI - a basic table listing biological taxonomy isn't real useful - could you try to make it more of an article and not jsut a data sheet? I've noticed this comment getting made on some of the other pages you have created as well. Regards Manning 02:14, July 21, 2005 (UTC)
* Hello Manning
Thank you for your suggestion.
Of course that I don't agree with your stattement that a table listing biological taxa is no useful.
You can pick informations among several books and all of them have taxonomical lists about the described species.Is a very usefull way to understand the taxonomical position of each species. 
Realy worst is the fact that one can't have a complete taxa description about a specific group withouth having to read several authors and compare them, for finaly conclude in which direction to go.
All I'm presenting is a simple way to have species taxonomy in a simple and comprehensive way.
This is complete diferent from Wikipedia Tree of Life and of course can be linked to that project, assuming that you can find in W. Tree of Life no more than a few species.As for the description I assume that W. Tree of Life is the correct place for explain each species.
You can also see another list of taxonomical clasifications in Shark taxonomy specialy in Shark taxonomy Order Hexanchiformes and so far I didn't received any indication of no useful lists.If you saw some of that information, please let me know because as I've not seen I would like to answer.Tank you--JPPINTO 00:45, 23 July 2005 (UTC)