Talk:Arch bridge

message: That old photo sucks.  I used the lack of copyright info as justification for removing it, but that fact that  #1 it is still an unknown location, #2 the photo is underexposed, #3 it dosent even show the whole main span, much less the entire bridge (read abutments). #4 a rock takes up 1/3 of the photo.  Cacophony 18:55, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
i'd vote for the old photo to stay for now. Because 2 photos is better than 1, and a photo of older bridge is nice complement to a modern tech version. Xah Lee 21:04, 2005 Apr 17 (UTC)
This is not a good photo for this article as the bridge is a compression arch suspended-deck bridge, a sophisticated variation of the basic arch bridge. Better would be :Image:NagasakiMeganebashi.jpg - Leonard G. 04:14, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think a cull of images is in order here. The text is being crowded out. Leithp 21:18, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No comment from anyone, so I've done it. Leithp 21:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Moved here, User:71.74.22.224 had added this to the main article.
"wikipedia uses lots of vocab. in these statements[:"
"this web site has to much vocabulary usein it[:"
--Mmdoogie (talk) 19:49, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment 

message: The book is new, unreviewed (google finds only adverts), and touches on only a small part of this topic.  Tedickey (talk) 14:54, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is not clear why the anonymous editor, 206.82.218.140, inserted the reference. It intrigues me that the editor specifically referenced page 336. I would concur with the removal of the reference unless the anon shows up and gives better reasoning or an in-line link. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 22:50, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This says the book has 366 pages (perhaps a typo). Tedickey (talk) 22:54, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dirk Proske  book 

message: I have redirected "Arc bridge" here but I think this may be wrong. If Clyde Arc is typical then it seems to be a kind of suspension bridge. Are there any bridge engineers out there? Biscuittin (talk) 09:42, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Your redirect is appropriate; there's no specific type of bridge known as an "arc".  The Clyde Arc is just a stylised name—the type of bridge is a tied-arch, and there are several others that look like it, including the magnificent Juscelino Kubitschek bridge in Brazil.  Maedin\talk 11:16, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. Biscuittin (talk) 14:41, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arc bridge 

message: Compare "Constructions such as [...] Ponte Veccio combined sound engineering (span-to-rise ratio of over 5.3 to 1) with aesthetical appeal" with "the Zhaozhou Bridge [...] combined a very low span-to-rise ratio of 5.2:1 with ...". It seems contradictory to me and I would suggest that the latter is incorrect. —MegaPedant 12:37, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Span-to-rise ratio confusion 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:24, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Eleutherna Bridge, Crete, Greece. Pic 03.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Arch bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080408153052/http://odysseus.culture.gr:80/h/2/eh251.jsp?obj_id=1710 to http://odysseus.culture.gr/h/2/eh251.jsp?obj_id=1710
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050302094119/http://www.matsuo-bridge.co.jp:80/english/bridges/basics/arch.shtm to http://www.matsuo-bridge.co.jp/english/bridges/basics/arch.shtm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Arch bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to ftp://imgs.ebuild.com/woc/M880252.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100216230014/http://www.aspirebridge.org/pdfs/magazine/issue_13/galena_creek_win10.pdf to http://www.aspirebridge.org/pdfs/magazine/issue_13/galena_creek_win10.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.matsuo-bridge.co.jp/english/bridges/basics/arch.shtm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:13, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:06, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion