Talk:Blue Rose (role-playing game)

message: :Image:Blue rose cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 02:05, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Blue rose cover.jpg

message: By fantasy standards Aldis supports a strongly progressive worldview. Feminism, environmentalism and acceptance of homosexual-transgender lifestyles are strongly implied to be objectively correct
"Objectively correct" is something you say about hypotheses--things that you run experiments about. A political ideology can be based on premises that are objectively correct or incorrect, but the ideology itself cannot be. It's not a hypothesis.
I would change the wording myself, but I don't know what the original editor had in mind.
LogicalDash (talk) 06:21, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I know what the editor may have been getting at, but agree the wording is troublesome nonetheless. Some games set out a moral framework of what is, in fact, morally correct in a moral realist sense. That said, it's not a terminology that many in gaming or outside of ethical philosophy use, really, and I am not certain if that is what the editor was getting at. - Sangrolu (talk) 20:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing wording 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Blue Rose (role-playing game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705115755/http://www.true20.com/forum to http://www.true20.com/forum
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061211191008/http://true20.com:80/forum/viewforum.php?f=5 to http://true20.com/forum/viewforum.php?f=5
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified