Talk:Academic grading in Germany

message: Since the grading chart is horrendously inaccurate and does not any way represent the conversions used as equivalencies by German universities, perhaps it would be better to replace the chart with an explanation of the Modified Bavarian Formula? Honestly, the nobody really thinks that a B- from an American school is equivalent to a 3.7 from a Gymnasium. Similarly, the extra weight given to British grades is senseless. Unless the chart has a source, I think it needs to go. Even if it does, I think explaining the Bavarian Formula would be useful. It converts an American "B" to a 2.5, which seems accurate. Thoughts? 198.23.71.94 (talk) 13:00, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Grade Conversion Chart

message: I don't think that this "grades and IQ-section" makes much sense. I really don't think that the person, who earns a "eins" at a Sonderschule (special education school) has the same IQ as the persons who earns a "eins" at the Federal School of Saxony - Saint Afra (a school for the highly gifted).--Greatgreenwhale (talk) 21:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Grades and IQ

message: There should be some infos about the "final grade" both for university degree and gymnasium certificate, which are important for the ranking when applying for jobs, Internships ect, and which is considered if you want to study medicine or some other studies with "limited" number of participants. 
*Nowadays the ranking of the gymnasium certificate is used on the local level of a university, e.g. if you have a final grade of 2.3, you can pass the application to become electric engineering student, but you might need a final grade of 2.0 to study business. The local level can change from semester to semester and from university to university.
*The ranking of the "final grade" of a Bachelor or Diploma certificate is used for deciding about access to Master studies.
hemmerling (talk) 13:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Final Grade 

message: There was some other Pedagogic Grading at the Gymnasium in the 1970th and early 1980th ( and maybe it still goes on until today ?!), to support bright students: 
*Sports is a mandatory course from class 1 to 13.
*In the classes 12 and 13, you can replace sports in the calculation for the "final grade" by the marks for an additional course. So you have to participate in the sports course and in an extra course like religion - the extra course must fit with your timetable, so not all courses were selectable, in practice. This was officially.
*Starting with class 11, you have to decide for a team sport ( soccer, basketball, volley ball,..) and an individual sport ( swimming, athletic sports, dancing ).
*Now there is subliminal pedagogic grading: For team sports and dancing, measurable results are not really relevant for the mark. Therefore, the teachers are willing to give pupils a "4" as worst mark, if the pupil is making an effort. 
*For athletic sports and swimmming, just the measurable results count, so weak pupils can get a "5" there. 
*Thats why the sports teachers suggest to take dancing, if offered at the school, as "individual sport", to avoid a mark "5".
In my case, I got german Abitur in 1981, I was supported by the system, had no "5" on my certificates and was able to replace sports by another course with a good mark for the final certificate and the "final mark".
hemmerling (talk) 13:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that by German constitution, religion is not an extra course. (There are exceptions for some few länder, but that's the general normative case.)--2001:A60:1585:5901:BD75:A878:AE3B:E625 (talk) 23:30, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Pedagogic Grading

message: At the Gymnasium, not at the university, it was possible in the 1970th and 1980th to get a mark ( or even a "final mark" ?!) "0.7" wich is better than a "1.0".
hemmerling (talk) 14:34, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I recall that, too. "1.0" was for 14 points average; if you managed to score 15 points throughout, that was a 0.7. -- DevSolar (talk) 15:41, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not correct. Even though you can get 840 points of the 784 required for a 1.0, the grade can never be better. The formula is 5⅔-(your points)/168, right next to it it says that it can only be between 4.0 and 1.0. --Beliar (talk) 15:23, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

text: Those who talk about a "0.7"-Abitur mean that they extend the usual points/grade-conversion below the 1.0 threshold. If you do so, you get indeed a grade of something about 0.7 for an 840/840 Abitur. Which, however, appears as a 1.0 Abitur officially.--2001:A60:1585:5901:BD75:A878:AE3B:E625 (talk) 23:36, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mark 0.7 at Gymnasium 

message: The article says ""This is especially true for Gymnasien in the south of Germany, which tend to have harder curricula and thus grade tougher than those in the north.""
This line should be dropped as this assumption is not backed up by anything.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.171.229.161 (talk) 17:53, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  North vs. South 

message: * Proposed. — information should be kept in one place.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zhernovoi (talk • contribs) 21:51, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge from [[Academic grading in East Germany]] 

message: There is/was the grade "ausgezeichnet" (excellent? - Mr. Burns of the Simpsons is saying that in german dubbing) for any (?) overall achievement of 1.0 in Schools, Gymnasia (EOS in the GDR) and Academia (summa cum laude, as mentioned "mit höchstem Lob"). Maybe it is not in use nowadays, except for the PhDs--78.51.141.228 (talk) 05:50, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ausgezeichnet" is missing 

message: Substituted at 06:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Simply saying that 1.3 is equivalent to 3.7 in America, 1.7 to 3.3, 2.0 to 3.0 etc is very misleading. At the university level, usually anything below 1.5 is considered to be an extraordinarily good GPA (often in the top 10%, or even top 5%) , whereas 3.5 in America is considered good, but not outstanding (from what I've heard/read/seen so far, I may be mistaken). Moreover, 4.0 is a passing grade in Germany, meaning you can graduate with a 4.0 German GPA, whereas 2.0 is the threshold in America (the German equivalent would be 3.0 according to the table). This alone should be a reason why this is highly inaccurate. In fact, many engineering exams have an average of (or even higher) than 4.0. Please just remove that column.
155.69.180.17 (talk) 21:52, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Just get rid of the American equivalents in the "Overview" conversion table, please

message: I believe there are 2 mistakes in that section:
1.) As correctly stated in the article, a 1+ is usually accounted as 0.7. Therefore, if one had all courses at 15 points, the Abitur would be 0.7 and not "better than 0.6". I cannot confirm that there are no official gradesbetter than 1.0 given, 0.7 is well possible in all states I know.
2.) It states that 4- (4 points) would be the highest failing grade and there were 5 points (grade 4) needed to pass. I'm pretty sure that is wrong for all states. 4 points (4-) is still "ausreichend" ("sufficient"). Dennosius (talk) 10:33, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upper Secondary Education 

message: There are some tertiary education institutions (universities and universities of applied sciences), which use a 15-point grading system, such as the Hamburg University of Applied Sciences to name an example. Makkonen (talk) 20:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  15-point grading also in some tertiary education institutions