lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Emanuel Weiss

message: I do not believe there is any actual evidence in the historical record for "Seymour Piggy Schechter" a) having been the driver of the car, or futhermore b) to have been later tortured and/or killed for his role.  The only clear factual information I have ever seen relating to this individual is that his nickname was "Piggy".  The claims in the Wikipedia article are cited to a book that, as far as I can tell, is largely historical fiction, not non-fiction.  "Bummy Davis vs Murder, Inc." does contain a passage on this subject, but it appears to be a very clear misread of the historical record by the author.  It says that "Piggy" was tortured, shot, and set on fire.  I believe the author was simply very confused, and is thinking that the "Piggy" is actually "Puggy", which was Irving Feinstein, a man who _was_ set on fire by Murder, Inc.  I recommend this passage be stricken from the article unless a more reputable citation can be produced.  Cmuratori (talk) 08:28, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of the Canal du Nord

message: I find it unlikely that the canal was dug in German-occupied territory in the middle of war. I think the construction began before the war but was suspended when the Germans occupied the region in 1914. Indefatigable (talk) 22:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canal constructed 1918? 

message: If Lord Gort won his VC here, then why does this article imply that Canadian Soldiers did all the fighting? Surely other Allied troops were there in some sort of combat capacity? Dom 15:42 13 March 2008 (GMT)
::True.  Unfortunately, I don't have access to the information necessary to add all of the details to the article (my perspective on the article is limited to Canadian History) Cheers! Cam (Chat) 05:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I am beginning to add additional information about the Canal du Nord attack including participants other than the Canadian Corps. Most of the frontal attack was the Canadian Corps, other units were principally involved as the units fanned out after crossing the un-flooded portion of the terrain.--Labattblueboy 23:26, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Canadians?

message: My grandfather was a carpenter in the Royal Engineers. His diary entry for 27th September 1918 says "...we went up the line to bridge the Canal-du-Nord". I've read about Canadians being involved in bridging the Canal du Nord, but nothing about the British role. It's not clear to me whether he was helping Canadian engineers or if the British independently bridged the Canal.
(Davidwalker611 (talk) 11:49, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: British Involvement

message: I am intent of getting this article up to GA. I have already made some progress but I could use help in getting information on the German side and the advance of XVII Corps of the British Third Army. Labattblueboy (talk) 14:11, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Working towards GA

message: Any opposition me me removing the mention that the bridge in the infobox is an Inglis Mk1.-Labattblueboy (talk) 03:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  infoxbox photo of bridge 

message: I undid an edit that inserted Canadian Corps commander Currie into the infobox because it seemed best to include no Corps commanders or all of them. Canadian Corps was the leading edge, however VII and XXII Corps supported with minor engagements and  XVII, VI and IV Corps involved with exploitation efforts.--Labattblueboy (talk) 21:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Corps commanders
Talk:Emil Knoevenagel

message: Maybe it might be worth mentioning in a footnote that the name is indeed commonly spelt `oe` and not `ö`? I visited this page to double check this.
Context: Due to traditional/ASCII typographic constraints umlauts are generally split (ö -> oe), but now with computer keyboards umlauts are easy (e.g. in MacOS option+u followed by o), yet some names were commonly spelt split but get hypercorrected like Goethe. 86.29.109.179 (talk) 09:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe a note regarding the umlaut
Talk:Field archery

message: This article is a little one sided showing just the American NFAA rules.  What about the N.F.A.S rules which are in some cases significantly different.  TheTrojanHought 18:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes 

message: Isn't that the whole point of field archery?  At least, I'm sure it is under the N.F.A.S  TheTrojanHought 18:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Paragaph? 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.blackarrowfac.co.uk/nfas-shooting-styles. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  KylieTastic (talk) 08:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Emil Lindenfeld

message: This sounds like a P.R. site. Can you not tone down the language to be less dramatic and more encyclopedic and neutral?  --Mattisse 18:15, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I came to the page to resolve an old dispute tag. Found huge mess of pure effusiveness. Trimmed much. His website is dead, thus we have no refs. Google does produce some useful links, so this is not a hoax.  – S. Rich (talk) 16:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was it inevitable that he would win award after award? 
Talk:Emil Petrovici

message: 172.97.149.88 (talk) 00:17, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

text: The article is unsourced; you can add some sources and fix it yourself :) -- note you can also drop a message at WP:BLPN if you have BLP concerns. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 November 2020
Talk:Heldenbuch

message: Lei, un libro, de la saga Libro de los Heroes, y en la tapa dice Heldenbuch (en la tapa de un libro que se cuenta en la historia) quisiera que me digan a que se refiere. Muchas gracias.//  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.137.83.3 (talk) 19:48, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heldenbuch en el Libro de Los Heroes 

message: Should the bit about "rough doggerel" be removed from the lead? It strikes me as an aesthetic judgment and not really correct, as most of the poems in the Heldenbuch are in the Hildebrandston or Berner Ton. Knittelvers is more of what was being written at the time by Hans Sachs and co, isn't it?--Ermenrich (talk) 18:13, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the intro needs rewriting. I'm just working on the MS section at the moment. One thing completely missing is discussion of the woodcuts in the printed Heldenbuch, not that I have any real idea where to start on that topic. --Pfold (talk) 08:44, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, the bit about doggerel is a complete misreading of the Britannica article, which was referring to the 19th c. versions! --Pfold (talk) 10:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "doggerel" 

message: I just got my hands on Haustein's "Der Helden Buch" and the opening pages discuss how the story told by the barber Wilhelm Meister Wanderjahre is clearly inspired by the Heldenbuch-Prosa. I'll be expanding the reception section here with details out of Haustein's book that more clearly belong on this page than on Legends about Theoderic the Great.--Ermenrich (talk) 02:00, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goethe
Talk:Cajeta de Celaya

message: Why should this be merged with dulce de leche? This is nothing like dulce de leche. Why, because it's mexican? Because both of them use spanish words on the labels? You racist jerks! Just kidding, but they're different.
Hello.  Someone that know, please inform what is the difference between "Cajeta" and "Dulce de Leche".  In Colombia there is a similar milk candy named "Arequipe".  Is the same as Cajeta?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.249.163.208 (talk) 00:41, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Why merge?

message: "cajeta flavoured coke" [CITATION NEEDED] 
where did you find that? i've never seen that coke anywhere and google doesn't find any other source.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.234.120.193 (talk) 23:45, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Joke

message: An anonymous editor added this twice, but without any sources:
"==History==   
The point of which Cajeta was invented is unknown.  However it has been a popular sauce to use on a variety of desserts for a long time.  Cajeta originated in Celaya in the state of Guanajuato, in Mexico.   
    
However when Mexico began to pull free of Spanish rule, Cajeta started to become very popular.   
This was because cajeta became part of soldier’s ration due to its delicious taste, and how it lasted longer than other foods.  Throughout the years Cajeta has acquired many different recipes. "
Candleabracadabra (talk) 20:54, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: History?

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved to Cajeta de Celaya, and Cajeta redirected to Dulce de leche  No such user (talk) 12:07, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Cajeta →  – This article is about the solid dulce de leche confection, "cajeta" is just another name for dulce de leche. ReyHahn (talk) 13:33, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

text: Approve —¿philoserf? (talk) 12:51, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 2 July 2021
Talk:The Fundamentals

message: Is this the same pamphlet mentioned here?  Wired says that is supports evolution
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.12/convergence.html?pg=3&topic=&topic_set=
64.129.128.2 18:53, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I have heard it alleged that some of the claims in The Fundamentals are modern claims, not found in early Christian literature, and therefore cannot be legitimately called orthodox.  I hope that the article will include such criticism as it grows.
(Bob Schwanke)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.202.28.10 (talk) 18:41, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critiques of the Orthodoxy of The Fundamentals 

message: If we take "orthodox" in the meaning of "correct" the statements about The Fundamentals as a defense of orthodox Protestantism are in violation of NKPOV. Wikipedia shouldn't be saying some religions are true and others are false. 173.66.211.53 (talk) 16:16, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Literal interpretation has always been around.--¿3family6 contribs 17:37, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Orthodox"?
Talk:Carlisle Cullen

message: Please give any feedback on the article...I don't know how good I did with this...any comments? Bella 18:53, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks good to me. Raven23 19:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation 

message: Whoever keep removing the part about how Stregoni Benefici is Carlisle's other name....STOP! It's getting really annoying. If you would like proof, see this and search for Carlisle Cullen. It is a website monitered by Stephenie Meyer, so the source is reliable. Thanks ~ Bella Swan 23:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Stregoni Benefici is mentioned in Twilight when Bella is researching vampires. The Personal Correspondence sections on the Lexicon (like this one) are questions that have been directly answered by Stephenie herself. It's no more unreliable than using an interview with her or a Q&A from a signing as a source. She has obviously not mentioned everything that could possibly be told about Twilight on her official website, so not having it on there does not make it not true. In fact, she directs people to the Lexicon if they have a question that is not answered on her site (here). Andrea (talk) 14:18, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Glad to help. But I think the words "Stregoni benefici–that would be CARLISLE, my dear friend" are pretty clear. ;) Andrea (talk) 23:34, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stregoni Benefici

message: It is established that the Cullens have a lot of money, due to the fact that Carlisle is a high-pay doctor and Alice can predict trends on the stock market, thus setting up highly profitable investments in that area. But is the money all Carlisle's, as he's the breadwinner and leader of the coven? Does he give the others "pocket money"? Did he buy his children all their cars? Are they all under his name?
It is quite confusing, can someone please clarify? Andrea? Princess Rebel (talk) 13:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that yes, he does share his money with his 'children'. He is known for his compassion, and I think it would be entierly out of his character to keep all the money for himself. As for the cars, I would assume that at least some of the money came from him, but there is no real source saying with who's money the cars were bought, so we can't really know for sure. ~ Bella Swan? 11:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cullen Money 
Talk:False relation

message: The French page mentions false relations of the tritone. Is this terminology used in English? Rigadoun  (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point, it is indeed - I've added a sentence on it, and at some point will get a diagram like the one on the French page.
Matt.kaner 00:35, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: False relations of the tritone

message: The Super Mario Bros. main theme also contains one of these false relations, and might be a song that more people reading this article would be familiar with. It's between the melody and bass line in the D section, where the melody does a downward C triad starting on E, while the bass moves from C to F# to G. The F# in the bass briefly coincides with the G in melody, before resolving to a G.
I think it would be a good idea to include this in the article, perhaps even with a short audio clip. But first we'd need to find a source. Be on the lookout for one. — trlkly 06:47, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mario Bros theme song 

message: I wanted to add to the 2nd reference that this also isTuningmeister (talk) 20:14, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing the "sources" section?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Gagliarchives Radio Program

message: I guess my concern on this is that this page was up for a long time originally created by someone else. I changed it because it was wrong. Then Wiki redirected the page to WBZC when the program is in three different media outlets with over 100,000 downloads. I dont mind people editing the content, but the issue is that if other radio programs are being listed on wiki, and not being removed (stars end, echoes, dozens more) why is my entry being discriminated against? There is no spamming, or harsh words, or the like in the entry. It's a real radio program for 16 years in the Philadelphia area. Have you heard of Genesis? Pink Floyd? Gentle Giant? Yes? They were guests on the radio show. Does wiki need proof? We are very concerned about this.
Gagliarchives 19:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Emily Bacon

message: I think this article could really be improved by incorporating a picture of Emily Bacon as well as creating different sections in the article. It would also be interesting to include more information about her clinic. The biggest problem is that there are no citations. That being said, I think the material looks pretty good so far!
Billynorlin (talk) 23:29, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:God Lives Underwater-Life in the So-Called Space Age.jpg

message: The file I got from amazon.com (http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/I/61Y6T8WBTJL._SS500_.jpg) is a much higher resolution (500px x 500px) than the cover that was originally up. The only problem is that, for some reason, wikipedia seems to have decreased the image quality severely. Comparing the page to a local copy is very distressing. If this causes anyone discomfort, they can change it back to the 300-something px image. --H3xx 19:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Resolutions
Talk:Brockway Biggs

message: added: 
http://www.gracenote.com/music/album.html/genhiphop/c17a0332edc4539560e8455ff3bdced0.html
http://www.gracenote.com/music/album.html/genhiphop/007afc3ea69d7a472e99f4ea62140062.html
Performer's previous CD released were under alias, Pimp-T and Pimp-Tea. -- Syngori 16:41, 7 June 2007
Neither Brockway Biggs nor Troy Neilson is coming up in GraceNote.  Article either needs citations or it has to go. --John Nagle 19:02, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Read this review.  It's a comedy act, a stand-up comedian pretending to be a rapper. "Is the fact that Troy Neilson, a lanky, red-haired white guy with glasses that dresses like a pimp straight out the 70's funny per se?" 
Also, an article about the East Coast Music Awards says that ""Pimp-T was nominated for an ECMA (Urban Recording of the Year) and he applied for the hip hop stage but he didn't get on." --John Nagle 19:58, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This may be a hoax 

message: Wikipedia already has Pimp Tea, an article for this artist, so this has been made a redirect. --John Nagle 21:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirected to [[Pimp Tea]]
Talk:Emily Hahn

message: Found one from That's Magazines (English expat paper in China) https://www.thatsmags.com/china/post/28822/emily-hahn-the-american-writer-who-shocked-30s-shanghai
WhisperToMe (talk) 09:18, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional articles 

message: I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:
* Cite templates will be used where possible.
* I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
* Links (either direct or indirect) to potentially unreliable or incomplete digitised copies and to booksellers may be removed. 
This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 05:28, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bibliography
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Conakry

message: Why is "Roman rite" specified in some cases?  Were there other rites in the city? --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 00:25, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Roman rite"? 

message: I'm surprised the article has no demographics:  population, priests, parishes, etc.--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 00:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  demographics?
Talk:Henri de Braekeleer

message: In 1868 Henri De Braeckeleer won fame by shooting a tiger that had escaped from the Zoo in Antwerp and had already killed a man. Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 22:26, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that was his nephew Adriaan de Braekeleer (also an artist), and it was a small faits-divers at the time, not really something very famous. Vekemans and Werbrouck were the true heroes, facing the still healthy and dangerous tiger. Braekeleer simply gave the badly wounded animal the final shot to kill it, but the main shots were fired by the other two. Fram (talk) 04:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiger
Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Blantyre

message: Content added by  has been removed from this article for copyright reasons. In spite of warning, the individual using this IP has persisted in copying content from copyrighted sources without compatible licensing to Wikipedia. Please do not restore any removed text without first ensuring that the text does not duplicate, closely paraphrase or plagiarize from a previously published source, whether the one cited or another (issues have been detected from other sources than those named). Based on the editing pattern of this person, we cannot make the assumption that the content is usable. You are welcome to use sourced facts that may have been removed to create new content in your own words or to incorporate brief quotations of copyrighted material in accordance with the non-free content policy and guideline. See Wikipedia:Copy-paste and Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/67.184.212.160. Thank you. --💵Money💵emoji💵💸 15:05, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright cleanup
Talk:Emma Dunham Kelley-Hawkins

message: — Assignment last updated by Rivera.joel3 (talk) 18:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: African American Literature I
Talk:Emma Eckstein

message: Although Peter Gay's 1988 book does correctly identify Dr Ignaz Rosannes, it seems that it may be affirmatively misleading with regard to the incident(s). Robert Wilcocks in his 1994 book Maelzel's chess player: Sigmund Freud and the rhetoric of deceit takes Peter Gay to task, as follows at Chapter 3, Note 45, page 110:
:Peter Gay's despicable minimization of these happenings, which conflates three separate postoperative operations in different locations (the first two in the Eckstein apartment,//. the third in the Sanatorium Loew — all this is clearly detailed in Freud's letter to Fliess of Friday March 8, 1895) on three different days into one incident on one day and within one paragraph and with no mention of the further repeated interventions (Gay 1988, p.84), is, alas, typical of his propensity to lie as a historian when he is dealing with Freud. Gersuny, incidentally, does not exist in his [Gay's] scenario.  The advice to the reader: if you want to know the facts about Freud's life and activities do not read Gay (or Jones); if you want to savor at first hand the effect Freud has had on otherwise reputable researchers, do read Gay!
This should cause us to find a better citation for the acts of Dr Ignaz Rosannes. --Bejnar (talk) 19:34, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm - Freud Wars? Jacobisq (talk) 04:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Citing Peter Gay's book
Talk:Emma Nevada

message: The article has now been re-written from scratch. The draft of the new article is at Talk:Emma Nevada/Temp - Voceditenore (talk) 05:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That is fantastic work! Shoemaker's Holiday Over 204 FCs served 14:40, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Violation
Talk:Emmeline B. Wells

message: The following information needs a citation: 
"...whom she supported by again teaching school in Salt Lake City. She remained primarily responsible for supporting herself and her children for the rest of her life."
If anyone can find the source for the information, please cite it in the article. Thanks! Amgisseman(BYU) (talk) 21:30, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs Citation 
Talk:Emmerich Kálmán

message: Could someone make it so a search of "Imre Kalman" comes straight here? It wasn't working in the search bar, unless one put Emmerich.
Giamberardino 18:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: done - Nunh-huh 05:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled