lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CMJ

message: Not sure if the additional information about how people can participate in the Music Marathon event is helpful or against the rules.  It's a little harder to reference for articles that don't necessarily have scholarly research performed on them, but I wanted to give as much info as possible for those reading and curious.  Please delete if it is not allowed, or edit as necessary.  Any questions, please reach me at info@sonicbids.com, Thanks! --AprilAtSonicbids (talk) 22:57, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

message: All of these articles are relatively brief and there are already sections dedicated to each subject in the main article, which is also brief. This looks like a good candidate for a merge which could be easily done. Piriczki (talk) 13:57, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge discussion 

message: A recent edit to the article states that College Media Journal "was renamed to College Music Journal in the early 1980s" with a supposed "reference showing the name change before 1984." The reference in question (Freeman, Kim. "CMI Meet: Gathering Big Lift to College Radio" Billboard November 24, 1984: 1) says absolutely nothing about the publication changing its name, it simply incorrectly refers to the title as College Music Journal, a common misconception that sometimes appears in media sources. The claim that the Billboard article represents a name change is contradicted by numerous other articles in the same magazine throughout the 1980s, including some by the same author, that use the correct title College Media Journal (see ). The January 5, 2004 issue of CMJ New Music Report has a comprehensive history of CMJ detailing its beginning as College Media Journal and its change to CMJ New Music Report in 1982. The misconception about the title was addressed by the editor of CMJ in the November 1995 issue stating "we are often misidentified as College Music Journal, which is 100% wrong." The question "what does CMJ stand for?" was addressed again in the March 1998 issue. This publication was never, at any time in its history, known as College Music Journal. Piriczki (talk) 14:36, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct title of magazine 

message: The article doesn't say, and neither does the disambiguation page. Seems like an obvious thing to include.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kchwe (talk • contribs) 00:20, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The company was started by Robert Haber in 1978 as the College Media Journal, a bi-weekly trade magazine aimed at college radio programmers. Piriczki (talk) 01:50, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  What the hell does CMJ stand for?
Talk:Columbus Was a Dope

message: Is this story really in Expanded Universe or not?  The Expanded Universe page doesn't list it.  I don't have a copy of the book, so I'm not sure which page needs correcting, but one of them does.
UmbrageOfSnow (talk) 02:03, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appeared in Expanded Universe?
Talk:County of Nantes

message: Was Richard Count of Nantes? I thought he was called "Overlord of Brittany", while Constance was Duchess of Brittany and Countess of Richmond, Nantes, and Rennes. Articles from Wikipedia in French as well as in other languages state that Constance included her son in the government of the Duchy in 1196 and that he became Earl of Richmond and Count of Nantes and Rennes from this date until he disappeared in 1203.Aziliz Breizh (talk) 13:06, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard I of England
Talk:Marches of Neustria

message: That paragraph was added by a now blocked IP back in July 2022. I suspect the editor was merely interpreting the image at right, added back in July 2012 by . If you add up the blue and red dots you get 29. The 'provinces' are just whatever the white lines demarcate (in fact, the modern provinces of pre-revolutionary France). No idea what the colours signify but the same map is used at the article on the 15th-century French–Breton War. Probably both the map and the paragraph should be removed. Srnec (talk) 00:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  29 fortresses
Talk:Computer Power and Human Reason

message: Surely more can be said about this "influential" book than just posting the blurbs, comments printed on the back cover of the book. Liz Read! Talk! 19:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blurbs 
Talk:Conan (short story collection)

message: Borderline. Two reviews - one in magazine (Fantastic), but the other one in Science Fiction & Fantasy Book Review sems to be in a short-lived fanzine . Need a bit more to show clear notability... lotsof reprints and translation suggest common sense notability, but reliable sources would be nice. @Cunard (low priority). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , according to the book's entry in the Internet Speculative Fiction Database says, "Review [French] by Pierre Pelot (1980) in Fiction, #309". This is a review from Pierre Pelot in Fiction, the French edition of The Magazine of Fantasy & Science Fiction, which was edited by Alain Dorémieux. See :fr:Fiction (magazine). With the reviews in Fiction and Fantastic, this book should meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. I tried searching for more sources but had trouble finding any. I ran into numerous false positives since "Conan" is a very common name. Cunard (talk) 11:24, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Conan of Aquilonia

message: The cited source: George Xavier Baxter, as well as the "Proceedings of the Pacific Northwest Literary Society" (ans the Society itself) seem to exist only on Wikipedia (this page, the main Conan the Barbarian page, and, with a different author from the same publication, A Case of Identity). I suspect the quote was made up by the editor.94.199.24.28 (talk) 08:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: After extensive searching to confirm the reality of the source, I too have come up empty. Agree that it appears bogus. Deleting the material. BPK (talk) 04:00, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pacific Northwest Literary Society
Talk:JT the Bigga Figga

message: Copyrighted text was copied from AllMusic to J.T. the Bigga Figga article in revision 33163031, then merged into this article in revision 68424005. The WP:COPYVIO text has been removed. Yappy2bhere (talk) 02:05, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violation
Talk:Conceived in Liberty

message: I don't know the proper format for doing such a thing, but I'd like the article to point out that a copy of the book is available online: http://mises.org/document/3006/Conceived-in-Liberty-Volume-1-A-New-Land-A-New-People  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.160.179.33 (talk) 18:30, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 2012 comment

message: The book appears to have attracted no scholarly discussion and the article cites no sources.  Before launching an AfD I am soliciting comment here. Thanks.  SPECIFICO  talk  01:46, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Google Scholar gives it 22 citations, but I haven't checked what they are. Scholarly discussions, while useful, are not necessarily the only measure of notability. A book may have importance outside of such circles.  The article has 3 reviews which might be useful as references. But I agree that when comparing the 22 cites to the hundreds that his other books have garned, it is not that significant. I suggest incorporating the major points of the work into the biography article and then do a WP:BLAR. In the meantime I'll tag the article as refimprove.  – S. Rich (talk) 02:59, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes sense.  Even Murray is entitled to a clinker or 2 and we don't want to diffuse interest in his more successful efforts.   SPECIFICO  talk  03:02, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I find it strange that Rothbard's most important book advancing his non-empirical economics, Man Economy and State, lacks a Wiki page while this revisionist history work, claiming that "radical libertarianism" in a Rothbardian conception was at the heart of the American Revolution, has one. Update: I appear to have been mistaken. Steeletrap (talk) 03:05, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  Strange but true, strange but true.  Maybe this one was made into a movie?  SPECIFICO  talk  03:09, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No. But go do an AfD. It will just motivate someone or other to beef it up. CarolMooreDC - talkie talkie🗽 13:44, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this article be deleted? 
Talk:Perfect Sound Forever (magazine)

message: "Perfect Sound Forever (established 1993) remains the longest ongoing music magazine." -- What about Rolling Stone, etc.? Am I missing something here? --A. B. (talk) 21:56, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Most of the references are to the site itself. Steve Dufour 19:16, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable?

message: Because it was irrelevant. They have been around for 15 years yet some jackoff no one ever heard of was on the staff for a few months and that deserves a mention?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.220.98 (talk) 04:47, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Chris Ott Reference
Talk:Kooyong Classic

message: There is a long, ongoing discussion at d in tennis articles on English-language Wikipedia (e.g., this type of table). The discussion is about whether the "official sponsored name" of a tournament - such as Pacific Life Open - or another tournament name without the sponsor - such as Indian Wells Masters - must be used in those articles. Please join the discussion here. Thanks.  Tennis expert (talk) 09:00, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for wider input on discussion at WikiProject Tennis 

message: This tournament has a perfectly good non-sponsor name (Kooyong Classic) and is well known by this name, and therefore should not be titled or primarily referred to by the temporary sponsor name. Is anyone against a move to "Kooyong Classic"? — Limabeans 05:12, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  non-sponsor name 
Talk:Lithuanian Heavy Draught

message: Can someone please put this in the English System as well? Just curious, because I don't know what 900 kg is equal to. Thank you!
72.68.230.94 00:55, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bodysgallen Hall

message: Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore (talk) 15:31, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Trust pilot
Talk:Conjectures and Refutations

message: this book is first published in 1962 by Basic Books. Not 1963. See here:
http://lccn.loc.gov/63011566  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.112.66.185 (talk) 01:48, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  pub 

message: If I remember correctly, "Conjectures and Refutations" is also the title of the first essay in the book's collection, and which sets the theme.  This Wikipedia article ought begin by exposing this ambiguity. -smh@alum.mit.edu  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfamade (talk • contribs) 20:23, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  title 

message: …to avoid having to delete and so eviscerate the article. Shame on the editor that did this.  Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 02:05, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I will go a step further; how in bloody… did 19 non-IP editors edit this article over 6 years, including initially moving the awkward, IP-editor placed block of plagiarised text from on obviously novice-placed position on the page of the stub to its current integrated position, then remove the puffery of the back cover text, and not entertain any suspicion? Does AGF mean we accept miraculous manifestations of block text containing puffery, and not (as I did to establish the plagiarism) pick a sentence and search the web for it? This is unfathomable. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 02:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarised material converted to block quote
Talk:Block Arcade, Melbourne

message: Needs explanation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.214.127 (talk) 15:15, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: larrikin

message: Isn't the official name The Block Arcade, instead of just Block Arcade? 121.220.222.63 (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Block Arcade or Block Arcade? 

message: The bulk of this article was copied from here in this edit by . The document is hosted on Scribd and its specific license is "Attribution Non-Commercial". I don't know the fine points of that, but at the very minimum, no attribution was given. Dawnseeker2000 23:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright and proper use of license

message: This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the copyright material has been added recently. Reverting to a previous version (as has already been done by another editor) should suffice to resolve the copyright concern. Kerry (talk) 05:59, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: The information provided isn't well-supported by the three sources. The first says "THE BLOCK ARCADE - Once known for a larrikin gang called the Barcade Boys". The second (a blog post) says "In its heyday, it was well known as a hangout for young larrikin gangs called the “barcade boys,” who dealt drugs all day and hired prostitutes at night." The third source is about a historical fiction novel and it is NOT clear from this source what aspects of the novel are real amd what are fictional. I can find no references in the digitised newspapers in Trove to the "Barcade Boys" (which bothers me). There are some results from Google searches but again blogs and the sites that copy Wikipedia content. Does anyone have any more reliable sources? Kerry (talk) 05:46, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barcade Boys
Talk:Constantine's Sword

message: Although the article is still a stub, it would eventually have to integrate the vast amount of historical controversy and criticism that has been directed towards this book (cf ) ADM (talk) 23:53, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Critique

message: I removed this graphic since it was created for the documentary film and not the book which inspired it.
PainMan (talk) 12:20, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed Graphic

message: I object to the inclusion of this book under a list of "Anti-Catholic" books.
As Carroll makes clear in this book, as well as in the documentary, he is not anti-Catholic.  He remains a devout member of the Catholic communion.  To criticize and encourage reform of an institution is not necessarily to be against that institution.
Thus to label this book as anti-Catholic is, at best, tendentious and, at worst, a deliberate distortion.
PainMan (talk) 13:03, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anti-Catholic
Talk:Degraves Street

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Collins Street, Melbourne - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:43, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Block Place

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Collins Street, Melbourne - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:20, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:32, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Contra Celsum

message: This book by Origenes is called "Contra Celsum" (in Latin, classical as well as medieval) or "Kata Kelsou" in original Greek. Please delete this lemma, spreading nonsense all over the world. Thanks from Germany, Rabanus Flavus, 6 January 2008  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.201.227.248 (talk) 22:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I applaud your passion. The person who created the page must not have known that in Latin the preposition contra requires the accusative case. I'll move the page. Cynwolfe (talk) 13:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Little Collins Street

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Collins Street, Melbourne - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:22, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:53, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style 
Talk:Big Sky Airlines

message: Is this airline currently operating still?  I removed it from the navbox, assuming it was defunct, but now I'm not so sure. --Resplendent (talk) 21:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Per the following article, Big Sky is still operating from 10 cities in Montana, so I wouldn't consider them defunct yet.  Sox23 22:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status 

message: Big Sky had a short lived Cincinnati operation, with some small midwestern cities. Cape Girardeau MO, was one of them, and there were a few others I don't recall. The service was awarded through an Essential Air Service bid. Whether the routes were actually flown prior to bankruptcy, I don't know. Someone with further details, needs to include this in the article.
Eelb53 (talk) 03:57, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delta Cincinnati Hub Feed 
Talk:Holy Book of the Great Invisible Spirit

message: This page should really be moved to "The Holy Book of the Great Invisible Spirit".  
"Since the late 1940s it has become customary to refer to it inappropriately as the Gospel of the Egyptians." (John D. Turner) 
This is the title given in the 2007 Nag Hammadi Scriptures: International Edition (p. 247).
Kramden (talk) 06:55, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holy Book of the Great Invisible Spirit 

message: Graham1973 (talk) 11:56, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Book Type
Talk:Flinders Lane

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Collins Street, Melbourne - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 12:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Note: There is a proposal at WT:AURD#Move_articles_to_bracket_disambiguation to rename this article (and others) to conform to the WP:AURDNAME guideline – specifically, using brackets instead of a comma for disambiguation. - Evad37 [talk] 08:45, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation style
Talk:Counterparts (short story)

message: I’ve started this section in response to the request for a discussion, regarding the line in the article which describes the character as an alcoholic, who has gone for a quick glass of beer.
The line in the article is marked as dubious and I am uncertain as to what it is questioning. 
The man’s rapid journey out of his office, to the bar for a drink, and back into his office, was undoubtedly “quick.” The text of the story states that he runs “quickly” down his office stairs, and once he arrives at the bar, he drinks his glass of beer “at a gulp.” Circumstantial evidence also leads to the conclusion that his trip was a quick one. For example, his cover-story, to the office manager, for leaving the room, is that he’s going to the bathroom.
Is it dubious, whether the man is an alcoholic? This is a more difficult question. Is an “alcoholic” a person who is addicted to alcohol? The man definitely shows signs, throughout the story, of being addicted to alcohol. In the ninth paragraph of the story (not counting lines of dialogue as separate paragraphs), the man feels in his throat “...a sharp sensation of thirst. The man recognized the sensation and felt that he must have a good night’s drinking.” A few paragraphs later, he sneaks out of his workplace, to drink a glass of beer in a pub. He pawns his watch (or its chain, or both, the text is vague) in order to pay for a few drinks, over the course of one evening. At the end of the story, the man is angry, and one of the principal reasons for his anger is that “he had not even got drunk.” At least ten times, in the text (my own copy being about thirteen pages in length), the focus of the man’s thoughts turns from whatever else he is thinking about, to drinking. The text never labels the man as an “alcoholic” and although that concept had been formalized by 1852, I don’t think it was current, at the start of the 20th century, which is the setting of this story. But the man’s behavior, which includes actions which are not normal, and even extreme, can be best explained by the idea that he is addicted to alcohol. 
Nothing about the passage marked to be dubious seems to actually be dubious. catsmoke (talk) 04:51, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Farrington’s alcoholism, or quick glass of porter 

message: Would this do for the citation needed?
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/counterpart
Marcas.oduinn (talk) 05:54, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wiktionary entry for 'counterparts'
Talk:Coup d'État: A Practical Handbook

message: I have made some expansions in the description of the book's content it seems that otherwise we only have commentary on it [[Cangrande (talk) 12:47, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: expand

message: Zeddocument (talk) 17:12, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: lexis nexis list of other sources which site this book
Talk:Couples (novel)

message: Please note that this article's infobox is retrieving an ISBN from Wikidata currently. This is the result of a change made to  as a result of  this RfC. It would be appreciated if an editor took some time to review this ISBN to ensure it is appropriate for the infobox. If it is not, you could consider either correcting the ISBN on Wikidata (preferred) or introducing a blank ISBN parameter in the infobox to block the retrieval from Wikidata. If you do review the ISBN, please respond here so other editors don't duplicate your work. This is an automated message to address concerns that this change did not show up on watchlists. ~ RobTalk 01:21, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of ISBN from Wikidata 

message: Vansh.K and Vibha.S are the most known popular and best couple of the year 2022-23.They are popularly know as V².Thy both study in Carmel English School,Padmanabhanagar,Bengaluru Nithin snt (talk) 01:34, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best couple
Talk:Dynasty Warriors 2

message: Final Fight is a 2d game, while Dynasty Warriors 2 is a 3d polygon game. Final Fight is also much more linear. Dynasty Warriors 2 allows the player the freedom to move to nearly any point in a given stage at any time. I'm going to adjust the article.Rag-time4 01:50, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Final Fight is a poor comparison