Talk:Diving watch

message: The water resistances I usually see are 30/50/100/200/300/500/1000 meters and on up.  I looked up the ISO standards online, but of course they want to charge me for them.  I hope to improve this section not only reflect the ISO standards, but depict the common depth ratings one is likely to find in diving watches on the market.--ExarPalantas (talk) 05:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Water Resistance Section 

message: Since the official Rolex site uses the hyphenated form, "Sea-Dweller", I think we should refer to this watch by the maker's nomenclature. --RexxS (talk) 03:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rolex Sea-Dweller 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 19 October 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 15:22, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Oris 1000m.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Diving watch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080413023332/http://www.watchreport.com:80/2008/04/the-new-breitli.html to http://www.watchreport.com/2008/04/the-new-breitli.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070507181859/http://www.citizenwatch.co.jp:80/support/pdf/8203/e.pdf to http://www.citizenwatch.co.jp/support/pdf/8203/e.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714054302/http://www.pmwf.com/Watches/WatchSchool/WS%2014%20How%20to%20Resize%20Common%20Bracelets/WS%2014%20How%20to%20Resize%20Bracelets.htm to http://www.pmwf.com/Watches/WatchSchool/WS%2014%20How%20to%20Resize%20Common%20Bracelets/WS%2014%20How%20to%20Resize%20Bracelets.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090324082118/http://bjsonline.com:80/watches/articles/0022_4.shtml to http://bjsonline.com/watches/articles/0022_4.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090323112211/http://bjsonline.com:80/watches/articles/0022_5.shtml to http://bjsonline.com/watches/articles/0022_5.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326043038/http://www.20000feet.com:80/ to http://www.20000feet.com/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091222040140/http://www.citizenwatch.com:80/Technical/English/Full/8203_ebook.pdf to http://www.citizenwatch.com/Technical/English/Full/8203_ebook.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Diving watch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090220140715/http://www.rolex.com/en/ to http://www.rolex.com/en/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110617052936/http://www.dstan.mod.uk/standards/defstans/66/047/00000200.pdf to http://www.dstan.mod.uk/standards/defstans/66/047/00000200.pdf
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.comex.fr/suite/ceh/histo/histo%20anglais.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081005073910/http://www.comex.fr/suite/ceh/histo/histo%20anglais.html to http://www.comex.fr/suite/ceh/histo/histo%20anglais.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080318161745/http://www.watchreport.com/2007/08/extreme-dive-wa.html to http://www.watchreport.com/2007/08/extreme-dive-wa.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:25, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Parts of this Wiki are complete rubbish. 
In the depth rating table it implies that there are different dive watch requirements for “skin diving” and “Scuba Diving”.   This is rubbish. 
People read this sort of rubbish and believe it. It is dangerous. 
The whole article looks like a non diving (or even swimming) schoolboy took extracts from watch manufacturer advertisments. 
This article needs fixing or removing, before someone dies.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.220.91.224 (talk) 13:37, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Am very surprised neither the Zlatoust deep sea diver watch nor the very popular Vostok Amphibia merit nary a mention.
The Amphibia's have a dedicated claimed rate of 200m but during a mock submarine rescue exercise the Amphibia was found to survive intact to 800m.   There is also a small range of 300m Amphibia's.
As for the Zlatoust, some are rated 600/700m and some rated up to 1000m.   Very rudimentary construction with 4-5mm plate glass crystal, thick and heavy body construction, thick rubber seals and thick double O rings on the massive canteen crown.
92.25.27.167 (talk) 16:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russia?