lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Meet the Beatles!

message: The album was recorded at Abbey Road on February 11, 25, July 18, 30, August 21, September 11, 12, 30, October 3, 17, 21, 23, 29, 1963.
I deleted this part of the article because it was basically being redundant of what was already in the infobox. Just wanting to explain myself. ;-) Democraticmacguitarist (talk) 17:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Recording Sessions

message: i just delete his review, he isn't anymore considered a reliable source, look it up here on wikipedia, so i delete him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.196.255.86 (talk) 21:36, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  scaruffi 

message: the infobox was changed. Hotcop2 (talk) 19:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where did the single go? 

message: I reverted to an edit I did a year ago - I was asked to continue by another editor. I'm sorry, but my version scans better, is better organized, and has more pertinent info. References are forthcoming, but anyone who has a cursory knowledge of the history of the Beatles knows the facts presented are indeed correct. PJtP (talk) 00:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Reversion

message: I have excised the following from the article:
First of all, there was a stereo version of With The Beatles in 1963. Secondly, where does the information about special stereo mixes for Meet The Beatles! come from? Radiopathy •talk•   00:11, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: This had to be removed again, for the same reasons. Radiopathy •talk•   16:49, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need source!  
Talk:Something New (Beatles album)

message: You are invited to participate in an RfC at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/The Beatles on the issue of capitalising the definite article when mentioning the name of this band in running prose. This long-standing dispute is the subject of an open mediation case and we are requesting your help with determining the current community consensus. Thank you for your time. For the mediators. ~ GabeMc (talk|contribs) 23:08, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beatles RfC 

message: I just wanted to note that songs 2-6 on side 1 are listed under "duration" instead of "title". It looks very awkward, but I don't know how to change it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.11.195.188 (talk) 23:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track Listing error
Talk:Beatles '65

message: You are invited to participate in an RfC at Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/The Beatles on the issue of capitalising the definite article when mentioning the name of this band in running prose. This long-standing dispute is the subject of an open mediation case and we are requesting your help with determining the current community consensus. Thank you for your time. For the mediators. ~ GabeMc (talk|contribs) 23:06, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beatles RfC 

message: I just updated the personnel section specifically because McCartney wasn't listed there as having played piano on She's a Woman. I wanted that to be consistent with She's a Woman#Personnel. I also specified that the only song where  George Martin played was Rock and Roll Music.--Kevjgav (talk) 13:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul McCartney-piano (on "She's a Woman") and George Martin-piano (on "Rock and Roll Music") 
Talk:Investment Counselor

message: In the future, the world believes that what Ender did was evil.
This seems rather out of place. --OGoncho 06:21, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 7 Nov 2004

message: Isn’t the title of the story “Investment Counselor”? There’s no The in the story’s title in First Meetings in the Enderverse (Tor, August 2003, first edition). —Frungi 22:47, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah.  I have my copy, and the copyright notice and story itself confirm that there is no "The."  Interestingly enough, the book jacket says, "The Investment Counselor," but that was probably an oversight -Hbdragon88 05:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Changing this to a redirect to the "First Meetings" article, which already incorporates the text of this article. Guy who reads a lot (talk) 03:15, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing to Redirect
Talk:Matthew

message: The Greek – in the case of all four Gospel accounts – has kata, Latin secondo, both meaning according to. In other words [The] Good News according to .... There is a lively discussion as to the genre of the Gospels, hence their precise title, while not original but very early all the same, may be considered significant. (It is easy to see, why one often encounters of, even in scholarly writings ... it is 9 characters and 1 space shorter, and rolls better off the tongue.) Portress 02:53, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Category talk:Towns in Maryland

message: Many unincorporated communities have been labelled as "towns" by the Rambot.  Pearle was turning these textual descriptions into category structure.  Incorporated towns in Maryland had already been put here.  I will use Pearle's activity logs to move unincorporated towns accidentally added here to the proper category, and add all the remaining unincorporated towns to the right place.
This is a systematic problem with Census-derived Rambot data.  Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities for more information, or especially if you can help figure out how to fix it. -- Beland 07:10, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/IZAK

message: IZAK seems to have still not gotten the message about the mass-posting.  As documented Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/IZAK/Evidence#Continued activity, minutes after posting a long response on the Evidence page, IZAK contacted twenty-five twenty-eight users directing them to it - in the same manner as the complaint has stated.  I request that some sort of temporary injunction be put in place.  -- Netoholic @ 07:57, 2004 Nov 7 (UTC)
: I actually proposed an injunction prior to reading this... :) Martin 00:47, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary injunction 

message: Ambi asked me to comment on this case, so I will.
Given that we have never had any sort of rule limiting or prohibiting discussion on user talk pages, it seems unwise to me for the ArbCom to issue a ruling directly on that point.  There are a lot of problems I can envision with having such a rule, but the point is that right now, we don't have any such rule.
I'm sure you will all predict (correctly) that I'm uncomfortable with people using talk pages to campaign for particular editing outcomes, but there are some great difficulties here.  If he successfully campaigned for the deletion of the article Occupation of Israel, well, hmm, it was deleted by the outcome of the vote, right?  At what point does calling a problem to the attention of other editors constitute spamming?  Is it wrong only because the ArbCom thinks the result was mistaken (i.e. should the article have not been deleted?), or is it wrong to bring other editors into a discussion (if done too aggressively?)?
I would recommend against this portion of the judgment.  We don't seem to have a general problem of talk page spamming for POV positions, and it seems likely to me that we don't have to worry about it very much.  It's likely to be counterproductive, after all.  But if we do have a problem with it, then the community should develop policies about it, and those can be enforced by the ArbCom.
It is entirely possible that I've completely missed the point and am blathering on senselessly.  Don't hesitate to correct me if that's the case.  :-) Jimbo Wales 10:32, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inquiry
Talk:John E. McLaughlin

message: Is it correct for McLaughlin to appear in the series box as a Director of Central Intelligence?  Unlike Tenet or Goss, he hasn't gone through the appointment/confirmation process, which would make me think he's always been the Deputy Director, who gets to act as Director as long as the position is empty.  There are other gaps in the timeline of DCIs where this presumably happened but the Acting Director is not inserted in the sequence. BCoates 08:45, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, it's incorrect to refer to McLaughlin as Director. He was never Senate confirmed, and the CIA bio on him describes his July-Sep 2004 role as "Acting Director". - Walkiped 05:54, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the above, and that I am working on CIA succession boxes, and that no one has objected, I removed the succession box.
I removed text saying that McLaughlin had resigned on November 22, "citing confrontations with Goss' newly appointed chief of staff, Patrick Murray". In fact, McLaughlin announced his retirement on November 12, and did so, using McLaughlin's own words, as a "purely personal decision", according to the New York Times. - Walkiped 06:04, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Secularity

message: On the top of the article there's a map when Poland is described to have a state religion, I read the entire article and never found a reference that proves Poland to be have a state religion. Can you please provide a reference from the Polish constitution that proves Poland to have a state religion? If not, please correct the map.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.255.147.60 (talk) 12:49, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing citation for Poland 

message: The photo being referred to as a Laic assembly in Lebanon is actually one of the March 14 gathering, which did not call for secularism at all.
93.126.185.139 (talk) 18:35, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I clicked on the photo and it seems like the source claims it is about Laic. If you think it is problematic you can remove it as it won't affect the article overall. --Ramos1990 (talk) 01:41, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect photo from Lebanon

message: While the statement that Secular "does not necessarily imply hostility or rejection of God or religion" is questionable, the claim that Martin Luther used to speak of secular work as a "vocation from God" just does not ring true. Unless good evidence can found to supporter the Luther remark, should it not be deleted?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.29.103.52 (talk) 12:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern (mis)understandings of the term
Talk:Brit Awards

message: Awards won in a band/group should not be added to an individual's tally, otherwise all the individual members of Spice Girls, Take That, Coldplay, Foo Fighters, The Beatles, One Direction and et cetera...would be on here as well. So I propose the following changes:
:1. Robbie Williams should have 13 awards only
:2. Harry Styles won 1 individual award - remove
:3. George Michael won 2 individual awards - remove
:4. Freddie Mercury won 2 individual awards - remove
:5. Dave Grohl won  0 individual award - remove
:6. Beyonce should have 2 awards only
:ElizaOscar (talk) 02:22, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most successful acts 

message: The British Rock & Pop Awards (1979 - 1981) had a Fairs Cup/UEFA Cup type relationship with the Brit Awards. (i.e they were essentially the same thing but not officially and often took place in the stated absence of The Brits in some years). Music enthusiasts probably can't recall which one they were watching in roughly the same TV slot and format each year - https://musicforstowaways.wordpress.com/2014/10/10/british-rock-pop-awards-1979-1981/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.210.174 (talk) 14:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: British Rock & Pop Awards were The Brits in all but name
Talk:2004 Chūetsu earthquake

message: I suggest merge 2004 Derailment of Joetsu Shinkansen to 2004 Chūetsu earthquake. Derailment of Joetsu Shinkansen is an accident caused by the Chuetsu earthquake. In addition, there are no sources on 2004 Derailment of Joetsu Shinkansen. 126.161.93.227 (talk) 08:19, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Craigellachie, British Columbia

message: Well it made me laugh when I first heard it pronounced like that, anyway. Of course most Scots would expect it to be pronounced ending with Khee rather than He but I realise that that is difficult for most English speakers.  Changing it to He or Kee is quite acceptable though (Unlike Tchee which will make us smile if we're being polite and ROFL if we're not). -- Derek Ross |  Talk 09:56, 2004 Nov 7 (UTC)
:Well, prepare to laugh if you ever visit BC, because the typical pronunciation is nothing like the IPA overleaf - CRAIG-elLACHy.  Not that that's how _I_ pronounce it, but even so I'm not sure that I've got it right if hte accent mark on the IPA is supposed to be for the first syllable; I accent the second.  Is that right? -- wrote Skookum without signing
:::Yes, you should be accenting the second syllable, so that's right. IPA stress marks prefix the stressed syllable, so the IPA is indicating the second syllable. "Craigellachie" is basically an anglification of two Gaelic words, "Creag Eileachaidh" with "craig" meaning "crag" and "ellachie" meaning "of the rocky place". -- Derek Ross | Talk 04:58, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right about the pronunciation in BC, the "lach" is accented, the IPA should be fixed by someone who knows what their doing with that stuff :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.157.6.65 (talk) 15:04, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronuncation

message: Oppose The Last Spike was an event/ this is a place that long-outlasted that one-day event.  I hate mergists....Skookum1 07:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Spike merger discussion
Talk:Semiosis

message: I propose to include this page in a review of the presentation of semeiotics in Wikipedia.  
Steven Zenith 10:16, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: What's with the redundant phrase "insects and animals" throughout this article? Is this a semiotics thing? Let the rest of us in on the joke! :D Tzf (talk) 23:29, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insects are animals 

message: Does saying "Semiosis is triadic" and linking "triadic" to a page called "Reciprocal determinism" (which makes as little sense as this page) help anyone?
If we're trying to say that signification is a ternary relation between (i) the entity making a sign, (ii) the entity understanding the sign, and (iii) the entity signified by the sign, then we can say that, in so many words. With a citation!
Or we can say something else, explicitly, and again, with a citation.
But this (the entire contents of the section "Triadic reciprocal causation" of the Reciprocal determinism article):
    Triadic reciprocal causation is a term introduced by Albert Bandura[8] to refer to the mutual influence between three sets of factors:
        personal factors (e.g., cognitive, affective and biological events),
        the environment,
        behavior
is not good enough. It's uninformative, it's boring and it doesn't mention semiosis at all.
I'd like to delete the sentence "Semiosis is triadic and cyclic."
Buster79 (talk) 22:25, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triadic
Talk:Rowland Emett

message: Isn't Emmett the correct spelling? Charles Matthews 12:02, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I've checked the Oxford DNB and they have him as "Frederick Rowland Emett", but note that his birth certificate says "Frederick Roland". Probably more redirects need to be set up. David | Talk 23:24, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ritchie Blackmore

message: The Blackmor clan are estsblished in Scotland at least before the Norse invasion. Many sources will attest to this. i.e., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richie_Blackmore_(rugby_league)#Early_years  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.124.107.217 (talk) 04:08, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

message: German interview is not reliable source  because it don't mean that it is the English man to be birth in England. Though Blackmore was born in England, his father was born in Cardiff, Wales and his paternal grandfather was born in Swansea, Wales. --Mmarsh (talk) 23:44, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality

message: Anyone who has played or observed RB will know he is a superb slide guitarist yet no mention is made of this. There are many tracks for example Holy Man on Stormbringer and Catch the Rainbow from the first Rainbow album to name but two ----- let alone portions of his rendition of Beethoven's 9th. 
I also feel the style section does not underscore that Blackmore is very lyrical in his backing style, typically eschewing strummed chords for often complex rhythmic staccato lines, often overlayered with other parts (including with slide work) --- and forming melodic counterpoints to the overlying vocal lines to then periodically track back to the vocal melodic line.
Finally, I do feel it might be stated that compared to his contemporary metal guitarists, RB relatively rarely played pentatonic scales except for the main riff...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.248.162.190 (talk) 09:44, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slide Guitar 

message: Anyone know if he named his son after Rory Gallagher? Seems a bit of a coincidence. Not exactly an English name. Hanoi Road (talk) 00:15, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Son Rory 

message: No mention in this article of his early band Bobbie and the Dominators, see . Obviously that's a blog post so not a reliable source, but can a reliable source for that info be found? --Viennese Waltz 12:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bobbie and the Dominators 

message: Never heard of dominant minor scales and web searches turn up little, so is this a mistake? Is there some attribution for this statement? ;⁠-⁠) 89.214.204.51 (talk) 22:38, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dominant minor scales? 

message: There’s an opinion that list of guitarist is too long since every guitarist is influenced by Ritchie. Personally I don’t know a half of guitarists listed. What do you think? Should we ever enhance the list or stop it? — Voxamarkin (talk) 18:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legacy
Talk:Avraham Danzig

message: History_of_Gdansk - Known as Danzig to all Polish Jews? I guess only to German-speaking Jews.--Emax 13:19, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: :The vernacular of Polish Jews was Yiddish, which is a Middle-Germanic language they brought along when escaping persecutions in the Rhineland over the Black Plague. I cannot prove that Danzig was used exclusively, but it is highly likely that Danzig was favored, especially by those involved in international commerce in the Baltic Sea. JFW | T@lk 14:37, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It may be too short, but it's not a stub (3-10 lines is the stub criterion). JFW | T@lk 12:04, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: sorry about the edit, I did suspect there was an underlying reason for the strange wording  before I made It, but I would think that it is proper to call it Danzig, without the reference to how it was known in the Jewish community, it would probably have been known as Gdansk only to Poles.Yellowmellow45 23:11, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gdansk/Danzig 
Category talk:Bristol

message: ==Untitled==
I made this using GraphViz and some tools I wrote myself to examine the Category system.  They are aviailable from my user page.  Please let me know if you want a picture like this for any other category! JesseW 13:55, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of Category:Bristol's parentage

message: I made this using GraphViz and some tools I wrote myself to examine the Category system.  They are aviailable from my user page.  Please let me know if you want a picture like this for any other category! JesseW 13:55, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Socialist Party (Belgium)

message: Why is PS part of nearly every government (regional, local, ...) in Wallonia en and on Belgian level?
The reason for this appears to me mainly that it is the biggest French-speaking party. That allows it to dominate the local, intermediary and regional/community levels of governement. In addition, the large-scale system of double majorities on Belgian level makes it necessary to always include at least one Franch-speaking political party and one Flemish party. --Rudi Dierick 14:05, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Added an  thingy, currently no time to edit--Lord Snoeckx 19:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We don't say what the party actually stands for politically apart from in one sentence. This needs information on policies etc. Secretlondon (talk) 13:31, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  We need to say what they stand for 

message: If someone has reliable sources on the party’s former use of the fist and rose emblem, do contribute to Fist and rose#Belgium. Keriluamox (talk) 10:53, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fist and rose
Talk:Erehwon

message: I was going to make this a straight redirect to Erewhon, but decided this would just perpetuate the misspelling. In any case Erehwon may be taking on a life as its own. -- Solipsist 14:29, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm changing it to a redirect, as there is no extra information here. When a user is redirected, the notice "redirected from Erehwon" will appear, and the article at Erewhon states the name is an anagram, not a reversal. The town in New Zealand is spelled Erewhon, and is mentioned in that article. BonsaiViking 19:59, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is certainly scope for merging with the Erewhon article, but it would need to make much more play of the spelling problems. Wikipedia's normal redirect line is typically too small to notice with common mispelling problems. In this case there is a particular problem as people vaguely familiar with the name know it is a reversing of the word 'nowhere' and so typically get it wrong. There is nothing particularly wrong with keeping the articles separate if that helps to explain the mispelling problem. For an example of the scale of the problem a Google comparison suggests a correct to mispelling ratio of 160,000 : 60,000 -- Solipsist 21:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why not a redirect

message: If the location in New Zealand is spelt Butler's correct way as 'Erewhon' with a wh rather than an hw, shouldn't it me mentioned on the  Erewhon page rather than here. Or is this all too confusing and everything should be merged with the article about the novel? -- Solipsist 17:40, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Removing the New Zealand location as it is now better covered under the correct spelling. -- Solipsist 21:04, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: New Zealand location

message: Inclusion seems spammish, especially without references. --Ronz 20:32, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; I've reverted the edits. Magidin 12:43, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Erehwon Innovation Consulting?