Talk:Luc Robitaille

message: We all know that Robitaille was interim captain while Gretzky was injured in the 1992-93 season. However, Robitaille is not listed as "interim" captain in the Kings media guide or in the NHL Official Guide and Record Book. He is listed simply as "captain." To me, that means we have to remove the "interim" label. This is rather reminiscent of a similar discussion we had about his captaincy over on the LA Kings article talk page. -- Gmatsuda 00:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I thought we'd settled that issue over there.  The NHL does not, and never did, have a status called "interim" captain.  Either someone wears the "C" for the game or he doesn't.    Ravenswing  05:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I removed the "interrim" label per that discussion from some time ago. -- Gmatsuda 06:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The (interim) tag has been retired, per WikiProject discussion. Sorry for the inconviences everyone. GoodDay 20:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Shame on you! :-) -- Gmatsuda 21:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant well, honest. GoodDay 16:39, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was joking! -- Gmatsuda 22:24, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know. GoodDay 19:09, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interim captain 

message: If you haven't noticed, I've made a huge re-write to this article, and have resolved three of the five issues we had with the article.  However, we still have an issue with the amount of citations/references in the article.  Most of the information can be taken from the HockeyDB website, so what more citations and references should be added?  
Also, in the current version of the article, with the exception of each and every single one of Robitaille's first eight seasons with the Kings, I made mention of all the other seasons, including career highs, lows, and added a couple of franchise ranks I took from the Kings' 2007-08 media guide and NHL/Kings records (overall and amongst left wingers).  After all that, I only increased the article's size by 200+ bytes.  What more can be added to expand the article?  Ksy92003(talk), 21:25, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:CITE and WP:VERIFY for guidance on what needs to be cited. That's what I follow now after struggling to get Manzanar (yeah, I know that's not a hockey article) up to FA status. If the goal is to get this article up to FA status eventually, we'll need to follow those guidelines. -- Gmatsuda 21:28, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

text: As for expansion, let me think about it for awhile. I know there's more that should be in the article, but I don't have time to nail it down right now. -- Gmatsuda 21:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I know that Luc and his wife Stacia created a program to benefit those who lost their homes during Hurricane Katrina.  Being a Kings season-ticket holder, I've heard a lot about that at games and it was mentioned during his jersey retirement ceremony which I went to.  If we can find something about that, then that'd be perfect.  Robitaille is the best left winger in the history of the NHL.  His article shouldn't have any citation issues.  Ksy92003(talk), 22:46, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be worthy of inclusion. FYI: My focus right now (when I'm not covering the Kings) is the Los Angeles Kings article, working to get it up to FA status. Until I finish with that (that could take months), I'm probably not going to be worth much in terms of contributing to this article. I do believe there's more to Robitaile's career that should probably be included, but I don't really have time to think about the specifics. -- Gmatsuda 05:59, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When you're off working on Los Angeles Kings, don't worry.  I'll stay here and work on this article.  I just need some guidance, and hopefully I'll be able to find some good sites on the web, hopefully at lease something about the foundation he and his wife set up.  What other information (generic) would be helpful for this article?  Ksy92003(talk), 06:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Let me know if you get stuck on stuff that need citations. I have access to media guides dating back to 1993-94, the Official Guide and Record Book and other stuff. I can also contact the Kings directly if we can't find stuff. For now, since we're still developing the article, I'd lean towards citing anything that's a fact and all quotes need to be cited. When we start refining the article to get it to GA and FA, then we can remove unnecessary citations. This way, even if the article gets a little heavy with citations, at least we know what we have is verifiable. -- Gmatsuda 06:44, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remaining issues 

message: The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.
*Please expand the lead to conform with guidelines at Wikipedia:Lead. The article should have an appropriate number of paragraphs as is shown on WP:LEAD, and should adequately summarize the article.[?]
*This article has no or few images. Please see if there are any free use images that fall under the Wikipedia:Image use policy and fit under one of the Wikipedia:Image copyright tags that can be uploaded. To upload images on Wikipedia, go to Special:Upload; to upload non-fair use images on the Wikimedia Commons, go to commons:special:upload.[?]
*If this article is about a person, please add  along with the required parameters to the article - see Wikipedia:Persondata for more information.[?]
*Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Build the web, years with full dates should be linked; for example, link January 15, 2006.[?]
*As per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), dates shouldn't use th; for example, instead of using January 30th was a great day, use January 30 was a great day.[?]
*Generally, trivia sections are looked down upon; please either remove the trivia section or incorporate any important facts into the rest of the article.[?]
*Please reorder/rename the last few sections to follow guidelines at Wikipedia:Guide to layout.[?]
*Please ensure that the article has gone through a thorough copyediting so that it exemplifies some of Wikipedia's best work. See also User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a.[?]
You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD)  22:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto Peer Review 

message: I was asked for my opinion on the WP:GA potential of this article.  I am going to repeat most of my commments here some of which the auto review has mentioned:
#You need about a 3 paragraph lead for an internet era All-star professional athlete GA.  
#You might add an entire lead para about his playoff career if he did anything significant.
#You might want to subsection the main text in the pro career section.  Maybe All-star years (up to 94) and the rest or three sections.
#You also could link some hockey terms like goals, assists.  It seems to me that the All-star years I would think should have more text without doing any research.
#For reference, you should take a look at comparable GAs. 
#Can you find at least one reference per paragraph?  That is a very common standard for high quality articles nowadays.  For GA you are going to have to give the article a tertiary resource feel.  I.E., you are going to have to cite enough secondary sources that it sounds like everything you are saying is being said by a reliable source and that all facts are attributable or could be easily verified.  --TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:LOTD)  22:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional commentary

message: Why was he nicknamed that.--Something12356789 (talk) 16:31, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lucky Luc 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 17:24, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Vachon and Robitaille.jpg Nominated for Deletion