lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Carib Brewery

message: A brewery with identical branding and product line has opened in Cape Canaveral Florida. Is this a licensee or a related company? 2600:1006:B108:C3E2:B5CD:AE3F:3251:9620 (talk) 23:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That's the United States branch of Carib. Former Florida Beer Company. I've added that to the German article and will hopefully find the time to revise the English one. Thanks for the hint, and kind regards, Grueslayer 06:38, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related to Cape Canaveral location?
Talk:Carhartt

message: Hi, my name is Erica Salomon and I'm the PR manager at Carhartt. I wanted to reach out with some proposed changes to our page as they are anecdotal and presented as fact and I know Wikipedia prides itself on factual accuracy. 
 
The first instance is the paragraph below. Steven Rapiel is not a Carhartt employee as he left the company more than 20 years ago. We believe this to be his opinion and it is not substantiated by data. Can we have this section removed?
 
In the 1990s, Carhartt jackets achieved popularity with crack dealers. "They needed to keep warm and they needed to carry a lot of stuff," said Steven J. Rapiel, the New York City salesman for Carhartt. "Then the kids saw these guys on the street, and it became the hip thing to wear."[3] 
 
 
The second instance of anecdote presented as fact is below:
 
Carhartt's Mexican plants are "unionized" in the sense that they have a union registered on paper with the Mexican labor authorities but they run their operations like they were non-unionized plants.
 
This is simply not true. All of our facilities, whether they are located here in the U.S. or in Mexico, are unionized and are run in accordance with union guidelines and government regulations. 
 
Thanks so much for your consideration. We really appreciate it!
 
Esalomon48073 (talk) 15:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Changes to Carhartt Page
Talk:Queens (film)

message: There is an erroneous link here: The link of Raúl Jiménez is to the Mexican Footballer of the same name, not the Spanish actor (who has no wikipedia entry). The same error exists in the Spanish version of the page. I don't know how to fix this. Noam bergman (talk) 07:18, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it's been fixed since; thanks for pointing it out. Danielbritain (talk) 19:11, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error report
Talk:3Play Media

message: This article refers to a now-liquidated business named CaptionMax. The business ran from 1992-2017. 
The purchasers of the former company’s assets named their new company “Captionmax “ and assumed most of the ongoing work and former employees of CaptionMax. Nozraisin (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name spelling
Talk:Intu

message: "intu also launched the UK’s first online shopping centre"
I'd love to know what that means - was it taken from a press release? sheridan (talk) 10:05, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition of shopping centre
Talk:Golden Bay Air

message: The aeroplane pictured is not an Archer. Piper Archer's do not have a retractable undercarriage.
John Macilree (talk) 08:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: John - correct not sure why or who changed this. I have fixed.Andrewgprout (talk) 09:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect aeroplane caption
Talk:Strategic Education, Inc.

message: After the first sentence where the subject is defined as "Capella Education Company", can we just refer to it thereafter as "Capella"? I see this redundancy in some other articles, too. I think it better serves readers to keep things short when doing so doesn't take away value from the article. Just a thought. Mackey el Capitan (talk) 17:56, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  redundancy - capella education company 
Talk:Canon PowerShot

message: What are the differences between the different series of Powershot cameras? Does the A, G, or S mean anything? 90.229.135.239 21:12, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Different letter series 

message: I removed the gallery from this article because of the subjective nature of personal photographs.  A few pictures taken by wikipedians cannot best show what this product can do.  Just in case a visitor/reader desires to see products of this camera I added a link to the Flickr Camera Finder page.  To get more background on the reasoning for this please reference the Canon EDS 400D discussion page. Gh5046 21:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the gallery
Talk:Butterfly's Tongue

message: Manuel Lozano's link takes to a US politician. Not sure if they both are the same person.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.19.210 (talk) 04:55, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Manuel Lozano Link
Talk:Campmor

message: Do we honestly need these sections? It just sounds like some overly proud employee ranting about their employment using jargon that no one really will benefit from. --Mazeau (talk) 12:33, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal/culture/hierarchy 

message: This is obviously written in adspeak and corporate speak, not encyclopedia speak. And what exactly is a "perceived difference in pricing"? Different prices are indeed different in both perception and reality.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.118.229.114 (talk) 17:59, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basic Standards 

message: This article has such serious problems that it probably should be deleted. It has been tagged as an orphan for almost five years, and as spam for almost two. Neither issue has been addressed effectively.
It is pretty clearly a vanity project for someone deeply invested in the company—practically the whole article was written anonymously on July 10, 2008, from 68.63.171.159, an IP address in New Jersey where the company is located (with no edits to any other WP articles). Some attempts have been made in the succeeding five years to rein in the article's rampantly promotional thrust, but those attempts have not gone far enough.
My first inclination was to nominate this article for deletion, since its persistent orphan status and flagrant promotional bias amply qualify it for deletion. But as a preliminary alternative to deletion I am editing it instead. I have cut out almost the entire content of the article, since nearly every word flagrantly violated Wikipedia's standards of neutrality.
Maybe someone who is interested enough in the subject but has no vested interest in it will contribute toward making this a useful encyclopedia article. Otherwise, it should be deleted, since all the signs so far indicate that the subject is notable only to those who want to promote it.
I have had very good experiences shopping at Campmor, both online and in the store, but that alone does not qualify it for inclusion in an encyclopedia.
—Jim10701 (talk) 18:23, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Severe editing as an alternative to deletion 

message: There is a South African company of the same name producing tents.  --207.38.206.18 (talk) 16:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campmor Outdoor South Africa
Talk:FrieslandCampina

message: Suggest the article is NOT merged. The original company was involved in controversial dealings and this merits a separate article. BuzzWoof (talk) 14:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No response to previous talk on NOT merging. The German company has retained a different name - merger does not make sense. BuzzWoof (talk) 13:53, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think to merge. Recently was on page for Invicta FM which had merged with other stations in Kent and it has the same article for them all and not separate for the historical entity. It's not like this is especially salient historically anyway, it's all contemporary business and many will not attach much sentimental or cultural or other significance to the pre-merged Campina
Just noticed the historical controversy noted. Yet it is still a short article.Eugene-elgato (talk) 21:23, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Campina? 

message: Campina is now FrieslandCampina following a merger with Friesland Foods at the end of 2008. Can someone update the articles of both companies and/or open a new FrieslandCampina article? Source: http://www.frieslandcampina.com/english.htm 62.195.56.219 (talk) 07:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FrieslandCampina
Talk:Cambridge Scientific Center

message: As one of the people who worked in the IBM Scientific Center, 1968 - 1971, it is a bit disappointing to see a bare-bones description that is called a "stub".
According to the "No Original Research" constraint, perhaps I am not allowed to contribute.  Nonetheless, the work done at the Cambridge center and by
others in the same building (Project MAC, Multics, IBM Boston Advanced Programming Center, e.g.) has had lasting and significant impact on the history
of computing technology.
Dave Tuttle (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments on the categorization - Stub?
Talk:Cambridge Energy Research Associates

message: Let's bump this article up out of stub class.  First, we need to support the claims made by WP about CERA. There are many predictions made, and many of them did not pan out. 
Second, we need to maintain a good encyclopedic writing style, so "sell his soul" type comments need to be couched in terms that can be verified by other sources.  Skyemoor 14:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rigor

message: I'll start the ball rolling.  Here's one source (and more pages at the same site);
http://www.energybulletin.net/18111.html  --Skyemoor 14:30, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Camalot

message: The c4 was very much not the original model, it's like the 4th of 6th modell depending on who is counting. First model had a u-stem, 2nd was no thumb loop and then it was the c4. (and intermediate modells between). Original Camalot was not even from Black Diamond but from Chouinard Equipment (which went bankrupt and emerged to Black Diamond and Patagonia respectely). --213.89.6.93 (talk) 10:08, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Calyon Financial

message: I received a note from User:Oo7565 about the proposed deletion of this article on my talk page, for reason 'No evidence of notability in either the article or my search before nominating.' I object, and have followed the process to remove the tag. I've reviewed the guidelines in Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies), and I have the following to say about how Calyon Financial is a notable company:
* In the futures industry, no one would dispute the notability of this company. It was well known, and since merging with Fimat to become Newedge, it is even more so. It is a peer to Goldman Sachs and J.P. Morgan.
* To look for notice from independent sources is very simple, look for "Calyon Financial" in your favorite search engine. There is no lack of independent news coverage, and I'd estimate there are over 1000 articles on various topics relating to Calyon Financial.
Bchabala2 (talk) 23:44, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Deletion and subsequent objection
Talk:Caltrate

message: * Clearly non-notable (WP:NOTE) run-of-the-mill product page
* No sources after 2 years of request.
* No appropriate news articles found in quick search.
* Originally created in 2005 "in haste" by inexperienced editor, no longer active
★NealMcB★ (talk) 20:23, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It's notable for two reasons: it's one of the most commonly used and recommended calcium products. In part this stems from the name, which sounds as though it contains citrate, which it does not. The other reason this product is notable is its deceptive name, something like Glucosulin, which has nothing to do with glucose or insulin (it's kelp fiber). SBHarris 19:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: We need citations for those assertions.  Without them, the article just serves to bolster the deception.  ★NealMcB★ (talk) 20:38, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed for deletion - not notable 
Talk:Caledonian Brewing Company

message: This article should be merged with Caledonian Brewery.  The website of the brewing company in question. -- BlueCanoe 05:58, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This article merged into Caledonian Brewery as suggested.  I also transfered a Business and Economics template to Talk:Caledonian Brewery. -- BlueCanoe 23:25, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Calcomp

message: Kala Suyash Kumar mire (talk) 15:25, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kala
Talk:Thesis (1996 film)

message: The present text is extraordinarily patronising to the people of Spain, an ancient and cultured nation, and in particularly to its women. 
Why isn't every American film in Wikipedia blessed with a similar proviso, which could read something like: Throughout its history, the USA has been a violent, sexist and racist nation, which is widely reflected in its movies.
I suggest the whole section is drastically condensed or, better still, deleted.
Clifford Mill (talk) 20:17, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Context 

message: So many of these Wikipedia pages have plot descriptions pathetically long like this, I mean, come on, reading it almost takes as long as watching the whole film... It's just so bloody self-indulgent, it's supposed to be a summary, for goodness' sake!! 49.183.160.118 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 14:47, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Plot" section ridiculously long
Talk:Caesars Atlantic City

message: "Palace East – Located on the boardwalk side of the casino is the Asian gaming area Palace East, the newest casino area. Its design is influenced by Iconography; the direction, and the placement of elements, to influence players’ luck and to create the most lucky seating arrangements."  Reads like an advertisement, especially the part about seats creating luck for players.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.108.137.11 (talk) 03:06, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on Palace East reads like an advertisement.
Talk:Textron Marine & Land Systems

message: Textron Marine and Land Systems was formerly Textron Marine Systems.  It became Textron Marine & Land in the early 90's.  Before it was TMS, it was Bell Aerospace, and went through a phase of being "Bell Aerospace Textron" before becoming Textron Marine Systems in about 1989.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.4.221.19 (talk) 15:23, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cadillac Gage? 

message: See, I expect WP to be the one-stop shop for such questions, namely, is there a connection between Cadillac Gage and Cadillac?  But no, I now have to google that shit.  Sheesh. --jae (talk) 19:02, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cadillac Gage and Cadillac?
Talk:Cadbury UK

message: Article appears rather biased to news of food scares (which can be read about in the ext links), rather than giving the company history and brand history, which would be more encyclopaedic. Reference to Bourville village for workers and  Quakers etc a bit thin.  BulldozerD11 (talk) 12:15, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  See the main article Cadbury plc TeapotgeorgeTalk 18:50, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Balance 

message: Lack of clarity / links to Cadbury plc article, and corporate structure. BulldozerD11 (talk) 13:00, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cadbury plc / Cadbury Schweps 

message: Nothing about the sponsoring of Coronation Street, a UK soap-opera?  I mean, it lasted for what, ten years?  Should be worth a least a sentence's mention.
86.163.78.6 (talk) 13:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corrie?
Talk:Keurig Dr Pepper Canada

message: subject probably wasn't particularly notable when it did exist. information in this article which is of any use might as well bein the main article about the company and its history. Jasynnash2 (talk) 10:48, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: The article states "It probably no longer exists" regarding Cadbury Beverages Canada Inc., Since I am holding a can of Crush Orange that says that it is indeed made by Cadbury Beverages Canada, I am pretty sure this is wrong information (and maybe an employee there might be hurt to see this article).
My two cents.
216.58.41.159 (talk) 22:22, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "It probably no longer exists" may be wrong 

message: should be merged with Canada Dry Motts page I've just completed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cfs198 (talk • contribs) 16:09, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge 

message: I suggest that this page should be renamed to Keurig Dr Pepper Canada. That's the official business name that Keurig Canada Inc and Canada Dry Mott’s Inc operate under. Either that, or at least this page could be a lot more fleshed out.
--DarnDylan (talk) 09:03, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename?
Talk:List of law enforcement agencies in New Jersey

message: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.16.39.0 (talk) 13:50, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

message: Added links for NJ Human Services, DRPA, and Rutgers University Police Departments Chudlychudson 16:28, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Needs to be added to county list. 47.16.39.0 (talk) 13:51, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bergen County Police Dept
Talk:Cabot Creamery

message: Really need an article on Agri-Mark. It announced a profit of $14.9 million for 2009. No place to report it! Student7 (talk) 22:35, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Agri-Mark
Talk:BWX Technologies

message: I'm not clear on what needs to take place or which company's article should have which information. From the looks of one source, Babcock & Wilcox became BWX Technologies on July 1, 2015. That source also suggests the nuclear power related businesses go under this article, which already existed but referred to a unit of Babcock & Wilcox. I did that, even though what I moved was promotional sounding. I'm not clear on what historical information should go where, but I'm treating Babcock & Wilcox as if it is the parent company and the company that was there all along. If anyone can figure out what should be done, they are certainly welcome to do so.— Vchimpanzee •  talk • contributions •  16:48, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major overhaul in progress 

message: This page needs a complete overhaul. 199.246.255.168 (talk) 18:59, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most of what is here is inaccurate
Talk:Business International Corporation

message: ::Incidentally the CIA issue has just been revived by William Blum: . The reference he gives is Lobster (magazine), issue 14, November 1987. It may not be much - but it's more than this article has. Testbed (talk) 18:18, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The CIA connection to Business International is mentioned in this 1977 New York Times article (2nd column, 11th paragraph). 68.91.90.176 (talk) 02:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for this useful reference. I have edited the article to take account of this. Testbed (talk) 13:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: CIA
Talk:Busicom

message: While the additional information on this article is welcomed, there are now a number of problems with it.  Please remember this is a factual encyclopaedia, not a hyped product brochure.
*  There is no explanation in the first sentence about what Busicom actually is.  Is it a company, a project, a product, a shop, a political party, an elephant?
* Apart from being uncited, Peacock terms such as "famous in the computer industry" tell the reader nothing useful and shouldn't be in the lead.
* "demanding the impossible from Intel's engineers" - meaningless marketing speak.  Who says it was impossible?  If it was impossible, how was it managed?
* "they forced them to invent the first microprocessor"  - forced???  Did they hold them at gun point?  Threaten their families?
* "Intel announced the availability of the first microprocessor chipset family (all from the busicom design) to the world with an add in Electronic news" - That's announcing to the world as opposed to announcing it to ... where? The moon?  And its an advert, sometimes shortened to "ad".  An "add" is meaningless.
: "Add" is the form used in an alternative, unofficial written dialect distinguished by consensus-[mis]spelling  in which, for instance, "alot" is considered to be a word. That dialect shouldn't be used in Wikipedia. Nikevich (talk) 04:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see added comment below. Nikevich (talk) 04:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with this article 

message: Unfortunately, I've lost my reference*, but Four-Phase Systems built a number of complete computers based on a chip set designed by Lee Boysel. He put the design into the public domain. F.P.S. did several $billion in business using those computers, before the 4004 was announced (and, probably, even developed). The Intel 4004 was only the first microprocessor that was essentially contained in a single chip. *It was an insert into a trade magazine on the 25th anniversary of the first IC, as well as I can remember. ("25" is reliable.) Intel's P.R. has, in a sense, misled many people.
I could be encouraged to re-write this article (^_^). Regards, Nikevich (talk) 04:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first IC microprocessor
Talk:Buscapé

message: That logo is copyrighted. ;D  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.47.24.2 (talk) 16:55, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Burmantofts Pottery

message: Hello all, I added an image to this page as part of a short-term paid project to share images of a year of culture that was held in Leeds. There's more on the project here and more images to make use of here. Many thanks Lajmmoore (talk) 10:44, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New image
Talk:Burlington Industries

message: The famous Burlington Socks brand is actually a German company and has nothing to do with this business.
      
The company "Burlington Industries" no long exists.  It's only purpose now is to extract a free mention in every advertising of the Burlington Coat Factory stores.
Njbob (talk) 23:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Burlingwqton_Industries#/talk/new 80.41.80.222 (talk) 16:03, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  U.k. and euro factory  seem to be missing from companies history  I worked for shappe  and Burlington U.K  in 1970to 80  Colin bentrlington
Talk:Bunn-O-Matic Corporation

message: Isn't one of the notable features of Bunn coffee makers that they keep a resivor of warm water? Shouldn't this be mentioned here somewhere? --24.136.141.84 (talk) 18:59, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the link to the house fires that was in the reference section.  This was not referred to in any other section of the article, nor was it cited anywhere in the article.  YouTube isn't a fantastic source.  If someone wishes to expand the article and cite the 2006 manufacturer recall, that might be germane to the discussion, but it was 8 years ago. Sasouthcott (talk) 16:54, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fire Hazard / Recall 

message: Pour-over drip coffee was in use by 1908 when Melitta Bentz made her first filters. Bunn may have invented something, but it can't be what he's being credited with in this article. TooManyFingers (talk) 13:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pour-over inventor? Definitely not. 

message: The cone filter had already been in use for years. Modifying the shape of an existing product doesn't sound like inventing to me. TooManyFingers (talk) 14:10, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inventor of flat-bottomed filter