Talk:Malassezia

message: In my reference to The Times I gave the full title of the article - it can be seen in the edit, however it does not show up in the Referenes.Osborne 21:35, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no  tag in the references section -- the references are placed in that section manually via templates. You can do the same with yours (chose the appropriate  template) or you can add a ref tag there. I would suggest the former. - Revolving Bugbear (formerly Che Nuevara) 21:39, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: How is that single fact get its own section, and is it anything more than trivia? dude1818 (talk) 05:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers 

message: The lead on the article states the Malassezia can cause hypopigmentation. This seems unusual to me. I know in domestic species, chonic irritation (such as can be caused by Malassezia), tends to lead to a HYPER pigmentation (similar response occurs when you get a tan). I don't know what its likely to do in people though... 
Unless its attacking melanocytes, I don't know why/how it would depigment the skin. 
Ibycus314 (talk) 17:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: By releasing acids that burn the skin.  Correctrix (talk) 11:49, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hyper? or Hypo? pigmentation 

message: Referring to the person questioning Malassezias' ability to cause hypopigmentation in the skin, there is research pointing to one specie of Malassezia found in mainly the pacific ocean causing hyperpigmentation, or white bloches of the skin, "caused by growth of the fungus Malassezia furfur in the stratum corneum with minimal inflammatory reaction."(Haole rot. (n.d.) Farlex Partner Medical Dictionary. (2012). Retrieved September 6 2016 from http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Haole+rot) I believe this is what the author was referring to. My lab does research on this specific fungi and I would be happy to add to the page if necessary. Brooklyn Sedlmayr (talk) 09:38, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyperpigmentation

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Malassezia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425120901/http://ijms.sums.ac.ir/files/PDFfiles/29_1_08-Shams.pdf to http://ijms.sums.ac.ir/files/PDFfiles/29_1_08-Shams.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I propose to replace the following statements concerning Dermatitis and dandruff (D/SD) diseases and related to Malassezia info ():--AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 19:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malassezia: D/SD 

message: # Support - All the WP:RS for the text given are provided. Even though I would prefer to put both sub-species under different sections so far it's hard achieve as reviews/studies often don't separate them. --AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 19:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Support (Malassezia: D/SD)

message: # Oppose. Five cites for one claim? This is the kind of horror we want to avoid, not encourage. RfCs without WP:RFCBEFORE are also kind of disruptive. Alexbrn (talk) 02:18, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose (Malassezia: D/SD)

message: I propose to adopt the changes below but before this can be done here are some questions:
# Do you find the following excerpt being a biomedical information (WP:BMI)? 
# Does it require more sources (WP:RS/WP:SOURCE/WP:PRIMARY)?
# Do you have reasonable objections against putting the excerpt under «Malassezia restricta» section?
--AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 19:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: M. restricta spp. 1 

message: # No/No/No —
## I don't. A general fungus sub-species description has nothing to do with provisions of WP:BMI
##  It's enough for the information given.
## No objections. Adopt proposal ASAP. --AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 19:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: I propose to put the following text under «Malassezia restricta» subsection. Any reasonable objections here?
--AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 19:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: M. restricta spp. 2 (CD/Colitis) 

message: # Support — It's desirable to have some info on links between CD and fungus in animal models as underlying physiology is similar. For humans though there is little high-profile research currently. --AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 19:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Support (CD/Colitis)

message: # Oppose two unreliable medical sources and two footnotes? Would prefer to see something plain meeting WP:V using reliable sources only. Also an RfC without WP:RFCBEFORE is kind of disruptive (let along four of them). Alexbrn (talk) 02:08, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose (CD/Colitis)

message: I propose to put the following text under  «Malassezia globosa» subsection. Any reasonable objections? Feedback on sources is welcome.
--AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 19:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: M. globosa spp. - Pancreatic cancer 

message: # Support - The study enjoys New York Times, Nature and Cell journals coverage. As NOTABLE as it could be. Adopt. --AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 19:40, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Support (M. globosa spp. - Pancreatic cancer)

message: # Oppose horrible WP:OVERCITEd sentence with unreliable (primary/junk journal) sources mixed in, savouring of synthesis. An RfC without WP:RFCBEFORE is also kind of disruptive. Alexbrn (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Oppose (M. globosa spp. - Pancreatic cancer)

message: Some of this "litigation" has spilled over onto some internal discussion pages:
* Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment#Volume problems
* Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Request to enforce WP:FOC & WP:NPA in Talk:Malassezia
 — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  03:55, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Related discussions elsewhere

message: The following review article, published yesterday, may be of interest to some considering the discussion above:
*
Esculenta (talk) 12:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for heads up. This one is also interesting Overview of the Potential Role of Malassezia in Gut Health and Disease (2020). AXONOV (talk) ⚑ 15:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malassezia and cancer