lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:S.W.A.T. (film)

message: I propose that all references to SWAT other than the title of the movie, which is clearly S.W.A.T., be made without the periods between letters. The main article for SWAT does not use them. --Kevin Walter 07:09, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have gone ahead and made the changes, as well as major rewrites to the article. I have tagged the Plot section  because it is short compared to other films. --Kevin Walter 17:48, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that all acronyms (for example, SUV and LAPD) should be spelt without periods, since that's common usage in English - thoughts. John Coxon (talk) 15:28, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  SWAT vs. S.W.A.T. naming conventions 

message: Surely Alex Montel is actually French? This is pretty much clear since
- he has a French, rather than Spanish, accent
- he speaks French at the airport (saying "Bonjour" and "Merci" at passport control and later explaining that the knife is "pour bonheur", etc.
- Director Clark Johnson himself explains that Montel is French in one of the interviews on the DVD.
OK, the first two points might be explained by saying that he is, after all, pretending to be French (as Claude Bezoul), but he does not shed his French accent later. Does anyone care to clarify? --Helmold 22:18, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he's French - if the director says it on the DVD, it's reasonable to assume that he's correct, surely? John Coxon (talk) 15:28, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alex Montel French (rather than Spanish) 
Talk:Fresnel lantern

message: At the very least, it's confused and doesn't suggest that the author understands the optical principles of lenses.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.101.25.119 (talk) 22:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Optically, much of this is nonsense

message: *Need to make capitalization consistent. Is it "Fresnel" or "fresnel"? Isopropyl 01:56, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  In my theatre we use Source 4's/Lekos above the FOH and fresnels above the stage, with scoops at the back.
Agreed: the picture should at the very least show the distinctive stepped lens. Bryson430 19:31, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Got it, put it in. KeepOnTruckin 01:27, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Capitalization

message: Are they constructed with special glass?  If so, what kind?Longinus876 (talk) 05:19, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glass 

message: The article says that barn doors "are colloquially known as "Harris Flaps" in the United Kingdom theatre industry".
In 50+ years in theatre lighting in the UK and Australia I have never heard this phrase. The source for it is not authoritative. I have even tried to google it. Nothing came up.  Ranko strandini (talk) 04:35, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Barn doors v Harris Flaps
Talk:Busty Heart

message: Wikipedia Conflict of Interest guidelines, WP:COI for short, address the issues surrounding individuals/organizations editing articles about themselves.  Please read that entire policy. You must abide by WP:COI in this article. This means:
# Don't make changes yourself, except these non-controversial edits.
# For all other changes, request them here in Talk for review and potential incorporation.
# Please post a formal Declaration of interest here, if you plan to continue contributing to the article about yourself.  See this  example.
# While you are at it, please read WP:NOT (What Wikipedia is Not): One of the major things it is not is a vehicle for promotion of one's own career.
Thank you. DoctorJoeE (talk) 20:49, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:COI
Talk:Enantiostasis

message: Anyone who knows more about this than I do, please please add to and alter this article! 99of9 01:57, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added examples of how Cancer magister and halophiles use enantiostasis. If anyone could help elaborate on the reason why hemocyanin oxygen affinity changes in the Cancer magister, that would be great! --Tg11297 (talk) 03:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancer Magister and Halophiles
Talk:Sky High (2003 film)

message: I removed the merge tag to the manga, but added a merge suggestion for a merger between the series and the movie.  I still think they should remain separate, but if there was going to be a merger, it should be between the movie and its "sister" TV series, because there is a connection between the two.  The manga?--not so much (other than the basic concept).
Still I would suggest continuing to build the articles separately (because it's three completely different audiences) and use links in between where appropriate to show the connections and source material. 
Yumi  (Happy Yumi Harris (talk) 17:34, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Compromise?

message: I'm getting confused!  Let's please link this discussion and have it all on the same page.  Let's go here... Talk:Sky High (TV series)
Yumi (Happy Yumi Harris (talk) 17:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Linking Discussion
Talk:George Phillips (USMC)

message: I resent the use of wods like 'gallant' and 'bravery'. Though undoubtedly correct, they do not belong in an encyclopedic article. It ruins an otherwise good article. Please rewrite. 81.107.34.65 02:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reworded that part of the intro to take a more neutral tone. -- Wmahan. 18:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Though I may be biased with regards to the subject matter, (Pvt George Phillips was my great uncle) I don't see how one could resent the use of those terms.  Especially when taken in the context of his actions.  How did it ruin the article?(Bokland (talk) 00:46, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 10:59, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Speed Demon (2003 film)

message: I don't see how this movie is any way homosexual let alone "erotic". Troll edit? 96.39.164.216 (talk) 12:01, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't seen the movie. The IMDB 'reviews' mention David DeCoteau, who is openly gay, thought it would be interesting to add a homo-erotic spin, since it is usually women who are objectified. Apparently DeCoteau used to deny any homosexual content for his films source--Clover (Level → lel →lvl →/v/) 07:32, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Homoerotic Film"
Talk:Fireman's Fund Insurance Company

message: Not disputing the factual accuracy here, but this article does seem a bit like cheerleading.  A google search of "fireman's fund controversy" yeilds 90K+ articles, certianly there's more to the story. Cleanup requested as this is basically a bullet point list of things the company has done rather than a written history. --Xyrrus 02:02, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How does it looks now? I'm still working on it... for a company with 140 years of history and 4,000 employees it didn't have a very good article. --W.marsh 02:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Unttled

message: There have been many changes since the last posting.  FFIC's profitable divisions are either being sold off or being included into owner Allianz's own portfolio.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadalotta (talk • contribs) 03:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lots of Changes
Talk:The Story of the Weeping Camel

message: The film was presented in many festivals. A section "Awards and nominations", or equivalent, would make it class start. Hoverfish Talk 23:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards 

message: When the children are first watching the small television, Nu, pogodi! Episode 10 is shown. Should this be considered a reference to popular culture, or at least explained on the Nu, pogodi page itself?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.234.74.23 (talk) 00:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there any indication that this was an intentional choice? Or did it just happen to be on by random chance at the time of filming? Given the method of filming, I suspect the latter, which would turn it into meaningless trivia not worth mentioning. --Latebird (talk) 13:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Television 

message: "The filmmakers are Byambasuren Davaa and Luigi Falorni. She directed, he photographed, they co-wrote. They met at the Munich Film School, where she told him that her grandparents had been herders. Their film was shot on location in about a month, and has an authenticity in its very bones."
(The Story of the Weeping Camel, 
BY ROGER EBERT / June 18, 2004,
rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20040618/REVIEWS/406180302 )
-96.233.20.116 (talk) 14:58, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  shot on location in a month
Talk:Suicide Manual

message: Note on edit to page on Dec 26 2006:  Link *Official site (in Japanese) removed as it now points at an advertisement page with popups, instead of to the official site.  If anyone knows of the new official site, if any, it might be good to add the correct link to the article. Johnd39 05:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Surplus: Terrorized into Being Consumers

message: This is a terribly written article, must be improved.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.108.140.77 (talk) 01:25, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviews

message: ...is obviously not written by a fluent English user, it's obviously copied, and the so called "manifesto" itself is not relevant document to be put in encyclopedia. The whole article needs to be rewritten by an expert in the field. I tried to remove some of the most blatant claims, but I realized that too much of the article needs to be rewritten. I also had a bug trying to put the photo in film infobox (there were pieces of code appearing for no reason arround the photo).—Preceding unsigned comment added by A-Doo (talk • contribs) 03:46, 2 December 2006
: Not only that, but it's obviously NOT by the director and has a clear bias against the film. That whole section is junk and I have deleted it. It's biased personal opinion and its original authorship can't possibly be verified as authenitc. Most of the points are false. - cal —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.80.32.134 (talk) 22:25, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Surplus Manifesto

message: What information can be found about how it was produced, how it came about, who made it, why it was made, and who started it?--Kiyarrlls-talk 20:01, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about this film's production?
Talk:Southern royal albatross

message: Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Class:	Aves
Order:	Procellariiformes
Family:	Diomedeidae
Genus:	Diomedea
Species:	D. epomophora
Binomial name
Diomedea epomophora
Lesson, 1785
The Southern Royal Albatross, Diomedea epomophora, is a large seabird from the albatross family. It was once considered conspecific with the Northern Royal Albatross (Diomedea sanfordi) as the Royal Albatross and the split into two species is not universally accepted. The two species can be separated at sea by the plumage of the wing on adults, the Southern Royal Albatross having large areas of white going down the wings, as opposed to the Northern, which has entirely black wings. They are the whitest of all the albatrosses, with black wing tips. Their legs are flesh coloured, and their bill is pink with black edging.
The majority of the world's population of Southern Royal Albatrosses nest on Campbell Island, around 13,000 pairs. There are smaller colonies in the Auckland Islands, and some sanfordi X epomophora hybrids at the Northern Royal Albatross colony on the Otago Peninsula in New Zealand.
f69.142.202.79 02:56, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, lacking input, I'm going to remove that, since the only reference I can find is nearly verbatim on one other non-scientific website.  Feel free to correct me if an appropriate reference can be found. Davidlwilliamson (talk) 08:15, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Scientific classification
Talk:Svidd neger

message: I've heard that the title caused some controversy when the movie was released. Maybe someone could add a little about this, preferably with sources? (I'm guessing most sources for this would be in Norweigan. I'm from Sweden so I can understand Norweigan pretty well but I think it would be better if a native speaker added a little about this.) /Jiiimbooh (talk) 14:19, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy?
Talk:Sylvia (2003 film)

message: The "full effect" link seems to be defunct. Kdammers 07:23, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  bad link? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Cjsmith1996 (talk) 20:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: University Writing 1020 Communicating Feminism MW 1 pm
Talk:Montmorency series

message: this article could be categorized under historical fiction, juvenile fiction, or adventure/mystery (espionage), and psychology (multiple personalities)
*this is a terrible name for this article. it should be renamed to montmorency series. this name is misleading and would make one think that it is about the protagonist of the series, yet it is not about him, rather about the series he is in.
I corrected the name of the artcle to montmorency series.
I think this book's status should be more important. after all, it is the greatest book ever.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.221.94.230 (talk) 23:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Why are there so many spoilers in this article? Somebody should go through it and delete them. I might do some of them but I'm currently quite busy. Rock drum (talk) 15:22, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See WP:SPOILERS. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 17:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoilers?! 

message: I have assessed this article as Start class as per the request at WikiProject CHildren's Literature. While there is a large amount of information on the plots of each book, the style is not entirely encylopaedic in these sections, and the remainder of the article lacks content. Also, the entire article lacks adequate, reliable references. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 17:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 
Talk:Millennium (disambiguation)

message: Wasn't there a game called "Millenium"? (Not to be confused with "Millenia: Altered Destinies".)
:Yes, that's what I came here looking for. Added. Radix 13:21, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Game

message: A recent edit has – entirely correctly, in line with disambiguation page guidelines – removed the links to the years 1000 and 2000. Whilst that's strictly correct, I wonder if it's dangerous because of the number of articles which carelessly link here when they mean to go the page about the year 2000? It would be a major job to seek out and fix all of them. I propose that we deviate from strict disambiguation guidelines in this case and return at least the year 2000 to the page. Thoughts anyone? – Kieran T (talk) 12:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Loss of links
Talk:Pottery Barn

message: The article prior to my revert contained major NPOV issues including unsourced claims about the quality of the furniture they sell. If one believes such claim are accurate then please provide sources and rewrite the claims in an NPOV manner. --Cab88 02:07, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: POV issues

message: Merchandise can also be purchased through its catalog and website.  Ronewirl (talk) 11:53, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  On-line & Catalog Retailer 

message: Does anyone think that the kids store should have its own article? I think that would not be a bad idea given the popularity (at least in my family). ReginaldTQ (talk) 20:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh well, guess no takers. I will try to work on the sources instead.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ReginaldTQ (talk • contribs) 18:28, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pottery Barn Kids 

message: We have recently (Feb/Mar 2022) ordered bedroom and living room furniture from Pottery Barn and we now have to wait months for it to arrive. These supply chain issues are very frustrating as we try to furnish our new home in Florida. 2601:58B:8500:1940:60C1:FE8:A40C:5E2B (talk) 21:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pottery Barn Stock
Talk:Zurdo

message: those images are all fscked up, here on firefox 1.5.0.4. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.20.210.192 (talk • contribs) 
: It is not a browser problem, it is a page-markup problem.  —  pd_THOR | =/\= | 20:34, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:You Can't Stop the Murders

message: Yes, it does. Morganfitzp (talk) 04:12, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs cast section
Talk:James Alipius Goold

message: Can't see why Necrothesp removed all information bar one line. Was this accidental or vandalism?
Cor Unum 02:09, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:View from the Top

message: I deleted the comparison of royalty airlines to continental... Its not clear enough. It could just as easily be American Airlines, with a hub in dallas and new york, instead of houston and newark. Just about every airline has the same policies. Royalty seems to be a mixture of every major airline, and none.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.207.216.177 (talk) 21:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royalty Airlines 

message: There is a clone of this article, named “View from the top” (notice the difference in case of letter “t” in the last word), which was created 2 years later than this one, currently features almost the same content, but had received slightly less revision attention since. 213.234.235.82 (talk) 15:29, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate article 
Talk:Avanti (automobile)

message: This page needs to be updated...  Avantis are currently back in production...  Plus there is no mention of AVX.
Can we either get rid of this page or get rid of the similar text in the Studebaker Avanti page?  Having both is redundant and they will eventually diverge; better to have all info. in one place.  68.98.128.103 00:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Following the arrest of an Avanti company principal on very serious fraud charges, it would appear the low-volume custom-built non-Studebaker Avanti has an uncertain future. All the material in the present article is duplicated and updated in Studebaker Avanti which also includes a Trivia section on the pending court proceedings. So this article should be proposed for speedy deletion and the subject title redirected to the aforementioned article. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 15:47, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Idaho Spud

message: My references come from the Idaho Spud wrapper itself as well as an interview with the owner of the company in the book "candyfreak." If there is no cocoa butter, then it cannot be called "chocolate" per the pda. Compound is the name for what Idaho Spud is using. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaronproot (talk • contribs) 02:16, May 23, 2006
:But unless you're assuming the reader is familiar with FDA regs or chocolate-industry jargon, that's not a helpful change. --Calton | Talk 00:01, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Canon de 75 M(montagne) modele 1919 Schneider

message: I have a question: P. Chamberlain claims in its book that the Mle 1928 is a new design. However, a 1936 French army manual reads: "En 1928, le matériel fut légèrement modifié, en tenant compte de l'expérience acquise au Maroc. [In 1928, the gun was slightly modified, taking into account the experience acquired in Morocco]" (and also "NOTA - Le Mle 1928 diffère du Mie 1919 par le profil des boucliers (profil droit semblable à celui du 105). Les roues sont munies de tambours de frein. [NOTE - Mle 1928 differs from Mie 1919 by the profile of shields (straight profile similar to that of the 105). The wheels are fitted with brake drums]"). A magazine edited by the French Army similarly explains that the Mle 1928 is just a modernization of the Mle 1919. It gives the name Mle 1919-1928 to the gun, as does a French museum website . Who is right?--Le Petit Chat (talk) 14:37, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences with the [[Canon de 75 M(montagne) modele 1928]]?
Talk:SpywareStrike

message: Removed the proposed deletion template, this article has a link to a reliable source corroborating that SpywareStrike is a threat and malware.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.37.7.182 (talk) 00:30, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed Deletion

message: Added the cleanup tag as article has problems with WP:CITE, and some parts are also written in second person (see: Avoid the second person). Not sure whether it also has problems with WP:NPOV. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheJC (talk • contribs) 02:28, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup Tag
Talk:French battleship Jean Bart (1940)

message: This article is rather confusing. First the ship goes to Casablanca to escape the Germans, and then it battles the United States, with no explanation given. Also, when the ship engaged in battle with the U.S., was it commanded and/or manned by the French? If it was either commanded or manned by the French, why did they go along with it? -- Kjkolb 08:14, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added links to Vichy government and Operation Torch that should help clarify the issue. PpPachy 21:35, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: In the introduction it says the ship was decommissioned in 1961. The Post war active service section does not mention 1961 at all, and instead says it happened in 1968. Which date is correct? Delta 51 (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Decommissioning 
Talk:Water Park of America

message: User 156.98.129.16, stop vandalizing this page! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.197.138.180 (talk) 18:51, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalism

message: It is not the largest. By the way Kalahari Waterpark in Sandusky, Ohio will become the largest after it completes its huge expansion opening in December 2007  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.185.161.73 (talk) 22:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No

message: This page is nothing more than a big advertisement for Water Park of America. There is nothing notable about this water park other than it truly infringes on the namesake of the MOA and somehow claims to be the biggest. Well, lots of things are the biggest but that does not necessarily qualify for notability. I could open up the Coffeeshop of America across the street tomorrow and claim to have the best espresso in the state or something. In one week I am going to slap a huge speedy deletion process on this unless someone can argue for it. .:DavuMaya:. 05:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a speedy candidate. Use WP:AFD instead, though I imagine it will survive. And I do think the largest indoor waterpark in the U.S. is notable. Grandmasterka 05:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I took out the worst part myself, which you should do next time. Grandmasterka 05:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One week is up! Hmmm, I guess I can live with it now w/o the prices. Someone must have been very bored to document each individual slide in the park. .:DavuMaya:. 01:26, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This page is embarrassing. I found this page in the caption on Lazy_river and thought it was associated with MOA until I read the "Controversy" section. I am disgusted by the amount of picture spam. It feels like the owner of this park took them all himself and uploaded them with captions. I mean, are double pictures for the playground and lazy river really necessary? In fact, none of the pictures are necessary. This is not a significant article and really only the main picture (Outside of building) is needed. The amount of pictures relative to the amount of text is horrible. Even the most notable articles on here only have one or two pictures per (large) section. These pictures have no importance, and their captions don't help. This article needs to be cleaned up and the pictures need to be removed from the page. 98.111.140.24 (talk) 22:37, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free advertising, is that how it goes?