lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dear Boss letter

message: ok if jack the ripper was a doctor or a surgeon he would have known the blood would set up and be thick, he would have known this so he would have sent the message sooner. unless it's all a trick to throw people off the track of him being a doctor of some sort, but him not knowing the blood would thicken seems to give a little bit away [ The previous bit of randomness was unsigned (please use four ~ symbols at the end of a talk page comment) but by User:206.106.97.100 ]
:OK, but there's no reason to think the killer actually sent the letter in the first place, and no reason to believe he took any blood from any crime scene to turn into ink, and no reason to, well, even worry about it. DreamGuy 16:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Recently we've had some new editors adding claims that they got from a recent television documentary as if it proves who the author was. This kind of content violates our WP:NPOV policy, as it takes a side. Furthermore, this documentary (and the book it was based upon) is not the originator of these kinds of claims: there have been a number of theories and they have been included in a great number of books and other documentaries already. It'd be misleading to readers if all they heard about was the most recent one, as they'd think it was a new idea or uncontroversial or etc. If we do have some info here in this article sometime about the theories concerning who wrote this letter, it needs to be balanced and better sourced. DreamGuy (talk) 16:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who wrote it
Talk:ALBA Graduate Business School

message: It would be necessary for somebody knowledgeable to state the legal status of this institute. It appears in the lists and categories of Greek universities, however its statutes make it unlikely that it is officially a Greek university. Someone should add an explanatory sentence to this effect.alx_bio 14:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Indian Military Academy

message: I hope somebody can help in cleaning up, formatting this article, and also re-organizing/adding/deleting data, coz some of it might be copyvio or something.
Jai Sri Rama! 
Rama's Arrow 14:59, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Rama's Arrow, clean up started, 14 years later. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 05:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: Can someone with knowledge of IMA create a list of alumni please?
Vinay84 (talk) 12:28, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni 

message: I have removed the following text from the foreign alumni section - Lt. General Ghulam Jilani Khan – Pakistani martial law administrator.
Help is needed in finding a reference so it can be put back. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 05:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help needed finding a reference 

message: I'm getting confused here. Should the "s" be added or should it go. Or should Chakra remain the same and "recepients" added ("17 Ashoka Chakra recepients" OR "receipeints of 17 Ashoka Chakras")?
*Lead: Alumni are also recipients of 17 Ashoka Chakra, 84 Maha Vir Chakras and 41 Kirti Chakra among other honours.
*Notable alumni: Till 2016, alumni from the academy are recipients of 7 Param Vir Chakras, 17 Ashoka Chakra, 84 Maha Vir Chakras and 257 Vir Chakras.[17] Alumni are also recipients of 2 Sarvattam Yudh Seva Medals, 28 Uttam Yudh Seva Medals, 48 Kirti Chakra and 191 Shaurya Chakra.[67][68]
User:DBigXray Any suggestions? DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 06:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I went ahead and made some changes according to what I through was best. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 06:17, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chakra or Chakras or...??? 

message: Just want to outline the naming convention I have followed in this article.
* The Indian Military Academy
* The Academy
* IMA
If anyone has any changes or better ideas, please feel free to suggest or make the changes of course. Thanks. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 07:05, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming convention followed 

message: Training schedule with some rules and punishments. DTM (talk) 12:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  New content needed for...
Talk:DAX1

message: The Nuclear Receptor Nomenclature Committee system for naming receptors (e.g., NR0B1 for DAX1) is very useful, but is not normally used as the primary name for the receptor in the scientific literature.  For consistency with the names of other Wikipedia nuclear receptor articles, IMHO it would be better to name this article DAX1 with a redirect from NR0B1 to DAX1.  Alternatively the title could be "dosage-sensitive sex reversal, adrenal hypoplasia critical region, on chromosome X, gene 1", but that is way too wordy.  Boghog2 11:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd support that move. --Arcadian 12:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Per above discussion, NR0B1 has been moved to DAX1.  Boghog2 14:18, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: 1/15/17 DennisPietras (talk) 03:03, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved out of unassessed on the genetics project
Talk:Light poetry

message: The references to AsininePoetry.com and CoolSiteoftheDay.com in this article are obviously biased and not objective -- meant to advertise for a private website -- and should be removed. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 148.85.231.124 (talk) 19:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So remove them. —Psychonaut 22:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate Content 

message: I'm trying to start a list of reliable sources which could be mined for information for the article.  Feel free to add further entries, or remove them once the information's been incorporated. —Psychonaut (talk) 12:58, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there's Kingsley Amis' New Oxford Book of Light Verse (1978, ), of course, with his lengthy and perceptive introduction. -- Jmc (talk) 22:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further material to incorporate 
Talk:Culp's Hill

message: I have proposed that the Culp's Hill Observation Tower Foundation Ruin article be merged here because this seems like a case of inherited notablility. Wild Wolf (talk) 21:49, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: *Support, makes sense to me. Karl 334 ☞TALK to ME ☜ 22:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

text: Also practical because the Observation Tower article is rather small. GraemeLeggett (talk) 22:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The title on the July 3 map gives the date as 1883.  That is not correct.  The date should be 1863.  
Pantagnosis (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in July 3 map title
Talk:Carolinas campaign

message: I was reading through the article for a book report and noticed that the Battle of Morrisville is not listed under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carolinas_campaign#Engagements, when it should be placed after Carolinas campaign#Bentonville (March 19–21) taking place from April 13-15, 1865. Should it be added in or not? Thanks AviatorYT (talk) 02:15, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of Morrisville
Talk:Franklin–Nashville campaign

message: I have started to reorganize and expand this article, using the more recent campaign style and providing footnotes. Currently all of the battle descriptions are essentially copied from the National Park Service American Battlefield Protection Program website, which is public domain. I will be re-writing all of these to remove the plagiarism and expand the content significantly, both here and in the individual battle articles. Hal Jespersen (talk) 20:06, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion

message: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Iseult Δx parlez moi 22:45, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history]] has an [[WP:RFC|RFC]]

message: :Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Iseult Δx parlez moi 23:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history]] has an [[WP:RFC|RFC]]
Talk:Northern Virginia campaign

message: I have reverted the edits made by anonymous user 208.101.136.95. My apologies for using a blunt instrument to facilitate communications, but since I have no assured means of communications with an anonymous user, I am hoping this gets your attention. The edits are not lost and can be easily retrieved. (I do not understand the motivation for people who do not establish user IDs on Wikipedia. No personal identifying information is required, and having an established identity, even as a pseudonym -- which most people use -- makes it easier both for you and the rest of the community to communicate.)
I do not have particular problems with any of the edits that you made in terms of substance, other than a few spelling errors and an inability to use Wikipedia's notation for linking to other articles, but those are the kinds of problems that I am accustomed to helping correct. The problem in this case is that you are injecting new material into cited paragraphs and it is not clear that the citations currently in the article support the changes you are making. I describe this situation in my "style guide" for ACW articles, User:Hlj/CWediting#EFP, which I encourage you to read. If you choose to reinsert this material into the article, please either provide citations at the point of your addition or adjust the paragraph citation appropriately. If you are not able to do that using Wikipedia markup, I invite you to comment about your sources here on the talk page and I can provide some integration assistance. By the way, I do notice that the Hennessy citation is adequate for the large expansion of Pope's quotation, although I would ask you to reconsider reproducing this entire document. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a database of full text reproduction, and a lengthy quotation that is appropriate for a large book about a subject may not be so appropriate for an encyclopedia article. 
One other comment about some of your related editing in other articles. The encyclopedic nature of our writing does not lend itself to be florid style of writing that is appropriate for magazines or books. In the American Civil War articles, we generally leave this level of adjective-laden writing to quotations from the participants or historians, usually in side boxes to add some color to the article, but to maintain an encyclopedic tone in the main text. Hal Jespersen (talk) 17:38, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits of May 28, 2010

message: Just a friendly question. Where does the phrase Northern Virginia Campaign come from?
I have 6-700 books about the Civil war, 4-500 magazines plus the official records, southern historical papers etc, and I can never recall having seen Northern Virginia Campaign been used, except the last years on Wikipedia.
Wouldn't it be best to use the historical correct name, as it appears on reports etc, in the official records.
Just curious.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TomV71 (talk • contribs) 07:53, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: QUESTION
Talk:TV Party

message: Anyone know which Mick Jones? -- Krash 15:18, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Mick Jones of The Clash, of course.(138.89.116.191 (talk) 13:49, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: Art/New York graffiti 2600:1702:2D10:9350:B8C1:2353:7D68:48EE (talk) 01:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jean michele Basquiat/SAMO.COM
Talk:Valley campaigns of 1864

message: Shouldn't the Battle of Cloyd's Mountain be considered to have been a prelude to the Shenandoah Campaigns of 1864?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E2:370E:5896:2564:324D:D8C2:BE9A (talk) 16:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, pretty much Jubal Early opening up the Union lines Joshsintrests (talk) 02:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The CONFEDERATES* doing it, my mistake Joshsintrests (talk) 02:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cloyd's Mountain
Talk:30 Rockefeller Plaza

message: I'm curious if anyone could provide a newer shot with the new logo on the building. I don't have a full shot of just the building myself, and I'm not sure about the legal status of uploading a photo with a trademarked logo in it, but if someone else wants to see about that and upload/find a good forward facing shot of the building from the last decade, please do. —JJBers 20:33, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated building shot
Talk:Chandrasekhar limit

message: It is possible that something is wrong there, but it not a big piece of work to fix a mistake in an SVG image. If users will throw away such already made graphs, like 93.223.217.217 did, then probably someone will make again its own SVG replacement from scratch, instead of doing some useful thing. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:42, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Image:WhiteDwarf mass-radius en.svg]] 

message: I have changed the "Champagne Supernova" section to "Super-Chandrasekhar mass supernovae" and I expanded it by mentioning other supernovae that are believed were originated by WDs having masses greater than the Chandrasekhar mass.  RickV88 (talk) 23:03, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super-Chandrasekhar mass supernovae 

message: I reverted an edit that added Quark star to the lead. It's not a thing, so it does not belong in the lead.
If the Chandrasekhar limit is involved in a theory that predicts quark stars, an edit to the body of the article with a reference would be great! Johnjbarton (talk) 17:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quark star
Talk:List of multiplayer browser games

message: I've found one (FusionFall) that has been closed, there are probably several others. Might be worth looking through all of them again to see if any others are now closed. 2001:8003:7439:5600:6CF7:BB73:3C9B:952E (talk) 06:09, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated information - some games are now closed 

message: see this online version of the game. — BladeRikWr 01:42, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but the game has never been officially published as a browser game. secrethitler.io was not developed by Goat, Wolf, & Cabbage LLC but it's totally fine (legally speaking) because Secret Hitler's Creative Commons license allows for it, similar to Cards Against Humanity. You can find plenty of browser versions of CAH as well. In fact, I would imagine that you could find unofficial online versions of most board games, whether they are infringing or not. Woodroar (talk) 12:25, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online Secret Hitler
Talk:Dazzling Killmen

message: Posted by User:208.5.114.65:
:Dazzling Killmen never actually caught the attention of Butch Vig. I'm not sure where that came from!   - --Nick Sakes (nick.sakes@gmail.com)
::Was this comment by an actual member of Dazzling Killmen?  Badagnani 15:28, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vig reference
Talk:Pince-nez

message: Suggest removal entirely. This section appears to have virtually nothing to do with the article's subject. It seems to have been contributed by a fan of a particular German pilot rather than an authority on eyeglasses.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.147.139.206 (talk) 07:02, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use in early air combat

message: I understand why the picture is displayed but would it not make more sense to have a colour photo of someone wearing a pair at the top of the page so you get a clear picture of what pince-nez glasses are?  The B&W image does help much in my opinion - but then maybe I'm in need of spectacles?
(Aug 2010)
--------------------  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.206.204 (talk) 18:24, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roosevelt image 

message: Basically, this article cites no sources apart from Dictionary.com for its pronunciation. There were once some sources, cited as in-text web links, which had gone dead and were removed. I tried to find some sources on Pince Nez, but had little luck, and what little I did find conflicted with a lot of the material already in the article. I'm really not sure where to go with this, and I don't want to go and rewrite the whole thing without significant and reliable sources. Mendaliv (talk) 20:29, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: What is the plural of pince-nez? Jackiespeel (talk) 11:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Ethel (XM)

message: I just cleaned up this article.  I'm not sure what other relevant information could be added.  Should this article still be considered a stub?  I'm a wikipedia newbie, so forgive my ignorance and please let me know if there is something I should do differently in the future.
129.79.113.151 15:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Connecticut Lakes

message: Nice move.  I have to admit this makes more sense than a bunch of separate stubs. - Denimadept (talk) 21:09, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks :) --Zfish118 (talk) 19:01, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good thinking! Best, Markvs88 (talk) 19:48, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 
Talk:Punding

message: "adding or removing spaces in a Wikipedia article in such a way that the appearance of the article is affected only imperceptibley or not at all."  Is that a joke or graffiti?  Seems strange to mention Wikipedia in this article.  - jeffhoy
agreed.  rhetoric removed.
I think you guys missed the point -- jeffhoy added a very specific example of punding and I think it's hilarious in a very meta-way, to imagine that there are actually people that go around doing this. It seems plausible. Kevin143 05:24, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: adding

message: Is stacking tetrominoes into a 10-cell-wide space and removing rows of 10 squares considered punding? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 19:23, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The above probably wouldn't count since removing rows awards points in the game of Tetris (nice joke though :).  On a similar line of thinking, could we include Minecraft (or other virtal sandboxes) as a possible punding scenario?  Sandboxes are different than games like Tetris since there often is no scoring system, hence "pointless" organization can occur. Myoglobin (talk) 21:24, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tetris?
Talk:Cellular (film)

message: Checking online (and excluding WP mirrors), I can't find a source for the character Ryan's name. "Hewitt" was introduced in 2013 then "Ackerman" was introduced with diff, but neither were sourced. In doubt, I'm changing it back to plain Ryan. benzband (talk) 13:47, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ryan
Talk:W (duo)

message: Just thought I'd let ya know Juhtuo (talk • contribs) created 7 pages on songs listed here with the same very brief description (A song from Japanese singer duo W. Song is from album DUO U&U). I think they should either be expanded or deleted. Thanks, --WikiSlasher 06:43, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Song articles

message: Wouldn't it be more appropriate to name this article as "W (girl group)"—or better yet, "W (group)", because "W (girl group)" may imply that there's a boy band that is named W—and not W (band)? It's just that the word "band" implies that they play instruments, which they don't. Looking for other Wikipedians' opinions and comments before moving it to either pages I have suggested. Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin  07:33, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I guess that works too. Thanks. XD Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin  06:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band? 

message: I removed information about W being referred to as "Double U" or "Double You." I have not found any official source, article, or press release that ever refers to them by these names especially in Japanese. The closest I can find is a comment made by their producer, Tsunku, on his blog: http://www.tsunku.net/officialcommentdetail.php?@DB_ID@=16 His comment seems to be mistranslated, because the part about "Double U" actually read: "「Ｗ」の語源「ＤＯＵＢＬＥ　Ｕ（二つのＹＯＵ）」の意から「ＹＯＵ＆ＹＯＵ」つまり「あなたとあなた」という感覚です。" which means "The origin of 'W' means 'Double U (two Yous)', so it gives off the feeling of 'You and You.'" He's explaining the meaning of the group name but does not actually use "Double U" as the group name itself. If there is official confirmation (like on CD covers) where "Double U" or "Double You" is actually used in English, feel free to readd. lullabying (talk) 22:00, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Double U" and "Double You" note
Talk:Nozomi Tsuji

message: I'm not good at putting up new information so I'll just put it here for now. On kakko-ii, it was said that Tsuji is now in a new unit along with Ami Tokitō and Gal Sone called Shibuya Ganguro. There are some scans there from a magazine including this one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Charles Nguyen (talk • contribs) 04:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New unit: Shibuya Ganguro 

message: rumor is that tsuji is pregnant is that true?
:It's not a rumor. She announced it to the Japanese press. That info is already in this article. --BillyTFried 23:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rumor

message: I don't think it should mention that she is having a comeback since there is no record of it being said. --Hippoharry07 (talk) 03:13, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Autumn 2008 Comeback
Talk:Humphrey Cobb

message: Hi, can you tell me your source for Cobb's birth date? The one I used came from his draft card. And thanks for finding his date of death. | Klaw ¡digame! 22:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Your explanation of the draft card discrepancy does make sense. It's not a huge deal, but I think we may get some questions if anyone else sees the draft card. And yes, Siena's just a short way from Firenze, and I wouldn't be surprised if that was the result of an ignorant immigration agent who'd never heard of Siena and put the nearest major city instead. Thanks for the response! | Klaw ¡digame! 19:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The tie to Gray. I wasn't logged in. Hcobb (talk) 06:37, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claiming the last edit
Talk:Ahmedabad district

message: This link:
*Ahmadabad entry in Encyclopaedia Iranica
Was added by a Columbia University IP along with many other links to the site.  I have moved it hear in keeping with our external links guidelines so unconnected editors can evaluate its appropriateness.  Many of the websites entries are short and may not contain much more than the articles they have been added to.  However, this might be a good source even if editors do not consider it an appropriate external link.  -- SiobhanHansa 22:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Encyclopedia Iranica is produced by Columbia University and is a scholarly source. It should not be removed from the articles as they are pertinent sources of reference.--Zereshk 12:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopaedia Iranica link 
Talk:Anand district

message: Hello my name is aditya from anand, my qustion is anand city which time for devloper?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.251.248.90 (talk) 08:58, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Banaskantha district

message: The 2011 census atlas has the name spelt Banas Kantha.  Can anyone confirm which spelling is the most common?  Skinsmoke (talk) 03:57, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Object (IBM i)

message: I propose merging Library (IBM i) into this page. Neither articles are in a great state right now, lacking citations, and also having a lot of WP:NOTMANUAL problems. However, if both were cleaned up, the contents of the two articles could fit together in one page. They are related (a library is a type of object in IBM i terms) so I think it would make sense to group them together. Vt320 (talk) 08:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal - Library