lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fragiskos Alvertis

message: Is it possible to use better quality pictures?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.117.19.70 (talk) 11:32, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.euroleague.net/news/i/12640/player-profile-fragiskos-alvertis-panathinaikos. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  John of Reading (talk) 08:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Blue-capped ifrit

message: I think this page may be of use; []. Qwerty number1 (talk) 20:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful site?
Talk:Pitohui

message: Some sources online say it is pronounced "like spitting: pittoeey".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.107.156.200 (talk) 17:27, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: It seems reasonable to merge the genus and a page describing the common use of the term as the same subject is being described. Klbrain (talk) 06:53, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Grey shrikethrush

message: This article lacks information e.g. on diet and breeding.
Also http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/species/index.html?action=SpcHTMDetails.asp&sid=5673&m=0 redirects to http://datazone.birdlife.org/home.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamesray1 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacking details
Talk:Shriketit

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:Falcunculus frontatus - Dharug National Park.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for July 12, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-07-12. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Black drongo

message: A gang of four of these followed me around my rural woods here at elevation 777 meters in Taiwan, one insisting on perching one meter from me.
First time it happend in all 10 years here on my 0.5 hectare. Jidanni (talk) 08:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perches one meter from people 
Talk:Greater racket-tailed drongo

message: I took this image out of the taxobox as we now have a live picture of the species. Sabine's Sunbird  talk 01:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  image 
Talk:SE postcode area

message: This needs explanation. It sounds impressive but doesn't convey meaning.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.140.57.113 (talk) 13:45, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This is hopefully clearer now. MRSC (talk) 19:01, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: districts are also split into two alphabetical tranches

message: *London SE28 
*London SE22‎ 
*London SE24
*London SE16
*London SE13
*London SE6‎
I've redirected these stubs here as they contain little substantive content that is not in this article. I'd be interested in any rationale for not doing that. MRSC (talk) 08:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you detail what information would be detailed in these articles that is not already contained in SE postcode area article? We need a rationale for creating these articles and none has been put forward. MRSC (talk) 12:05, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirects

message: I've changed the entry from calved out of SE2 to calved out of existing districts as a comparison of this and this indicates some of SE18 was also used. MRSC (talk) 12:26, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: SE28

message: Does anyone know what is meant by "Sidcup (small parts for 2012)" in the area for SE9?  With no reference for what this means, I am going to delete this.  If you disagree, please state why - happy for it to be restored if it makes sense.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.161.179.90 (talk) 20:26, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  SE9 - What? 

message: Which parts of SE1 are in the City of London? Crookesmoor (talk) 08:16, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Puzzles me as well. Is it perhaps London Bridge? - which is wholly in the City, including the south end?, while the postcode maps show the SE1 area extending to the north side of the river. But the only two buildings entered from the southern bridge approach, nos 1 and 2 London Bridge (which have SE1 addresses), are surely in the administrative Borough of Southwark. Similarly, the northern halves of several other bridges are in the City, but in SE1! --John O'London (talk) 11:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  SE1
Talk:Monarch flycatcher

message: I propose to merge Grallinidae into Monarch flycatcher. The former is considered a junior synonym of Monarchidae, which is the scientific name of the family covered by the latter. See Talk:Sinanthropus#Unexplained_informationectomy for discussion on why junior synonyms should not have their own pages. YorkshireExpat (talk) 13:30, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Junior synonyms should not have separate articles. FunkMonk (talk) 09:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Riksråd

message: It might be worth discussing if the Danish and Norwegian Councils should have separate articles?
--Barend 14:52, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If they are to be kept together it must be because they share enough features together that are not part of the functions of a general privy council Fornadan (t) 15:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Should the Danish and Norwegian "Riksråds" have separate articles?

message: The article states that "the Privy Council, Riksråd, officially was the ruling body of Sweden until 1974". That's not really true. Riksrådet was practically abolished by Gustav III and formally replaced by Statsrådet in 1809. --VincentPalmqvist (talk) 20:02, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Riksrådet in Sweden
Talk:Carole Nelson Douglas

message: Could someone change the Trivia section in the Midnight Louie article?
[]
According to all versions of Midnight Louie's origins that I've read (including the author's forwards in the books,) the version listed in this Carole Nelson Douglas wiki article is correct.  The version listed on the Midnight Louie page is not one I've ever seen mentioned, plus it gives the impression that the cat died shortly after Ms. Douglas discovered him.  Of course, I'm pretty sure the cat is dead of old age by now, considering that Catnap or Pussyfoot gave a date of 1973 for the original classified ad, I believe.
I left a note on the talk page for the Midnight Louie wiki page, but I'm not an editor, and I didn't change the trivia section itself.24.253.192.189 (talk) 23:09, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original Midnight Louie history in the Midnight Louie article 

message: The last book listed is Cat in an Alien X-Ray (from 2012 or 2013) which is the "X" book.  According to Ms. Douglas's webpage, the next books are "Cat in a Yellow Spotlight", "Cat in a Zoot-Suit Riot" (due Aug. 2015), and Cat in an Alphabet End-Game (not sure when its coming.)
This article and the Midnight Louie article both need updating.  I'm not sure if any books are missing from other series.156.110.24.142 (talk) 20:44, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing several new books in Midnight Louie 
Talk:Black-naped monarch

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Hypothymis azurea - Kaeng Krachan.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 9, 2016. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2016-02-09. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Hypothymis azurea - Kaeng Krachan.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:Indian paradise flycatcher

message: Though it says in this article that that the white form of the Asian paradise flycatcher is absent in Sri Lanka( cited as "Rasmussen PC & JC Anderton (2005). Birds of South Asia: The Ripley Guide. Vol.2. Smithsonian Institution & Lynx Edicions. pp. 332–333.")(Under heading 'Description' 2nd paragraph line 7)I know for a fact that it is present in Sri Lanka. The Indian Paradise Flycatcher (Terpsiphone paradisi paradisi) (a subspecies) is found in Sri Lanka as a migratory bird from September to May. The adult male has white plumage.  And I'm a Sri Lankan and I have seen this white Indian Paradise Flycatcher in my home garden every year in the migratory season.
Gregorvitch (talk) 07:56, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I rechecked Rasmussen it says that there is no white male form in Sri Lankan subspecies "ceylonesis" and it does mentions that many peninsular nominate individuals winter in Sri Lanka. (pp. 332-333) Shyamal (talk) 02:15, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

text: List of 14 recognized subspecies acc. to HBW is now complete, incl. the nominate paradisi. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 12:59, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  White form present in Sri Lanka as a migratory bird 

message: Is there any visual difference between the rufous Indian paradise flycatcher and Ceylon paradise flycatcher? Or are they the same bird with different names? I have pictures of a:
* White long-tailed flycatcher from Sri Lanka - 1
* Rufous short-tailed flycatcher from Sri Lanka - 1, 2
And I'm wondering how to categorize them... Ping User:BhagyaMani and User:Gregorvitch. Thanks in advance! Kind regards, Rehman 06:08, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: For subspecific differentiation and migrating season I suggest you ask an ornithologist In SL. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 10:14, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ceylon paradise flycatcher 
Talk:Australian rufous fantail

message: Hi all. I have noticed that this Wikipedia article is a stub and has not been substantially edited recently. Therefore, I have chosen to contribute to it for a science communication module I am doing at University. I hope to be substantially adding information to this Wikipedia entry in the coming week. I aim to eventually get it up to Featured Article (FA) status. 
If you have any constructive criticism or helpful suggestions to achieve this, please do not hesitate to let them be known.
Thanks.
Ant24788 (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: I am going to use the Northern Pintail featured article as a template for the layout of this Wikipedia article. I'll then perform literature searches and populate each individual category with information. Lastly, I'll write the lead as a summary of each category. Ant24788 (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: edit: found this for guidance Ant24788 (talk) 12:45, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Layout 

message: I have created several redirects to this article from:
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=rufous_fantail
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black-breasted_Rufous-fantail
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=black-breasted_rufous-fantail
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rufous-fronted-Fantail
*http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=rufous-fronted-fantail
as per the WikiProject Birds guidelines
Ant24788 (talk) 11:53, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: edit: I made some more: 
Rufous-fronted Flycatcher, rufous-fronted flycatcher
Wood Flycatcher, 
wood flycatcher, 
Red Fantail,
red fantail,
Allied Flycatcher, 
allied flycatcher, 
Rufous Fan, 
rufous fan, 
Red Fan 
red fan
Ant24788 (talk) 15:06, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirects
Talk:Wellspring Retreat and Resource Center

message: What is notable about this retreat center? Looking at the history of the article, I suspect that it was created to puff up people and organizations in the anti-cult movement that otherwise have minimal coverage in reliable sources. Elmmapleoakpine (talk) 22:52, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noteable?
Talk:Porto-Vecchio

message: I got rid of the objectionable material and added enough so that I feel justified in removing the tags. I will continue to work on this for bit, refining it. I think it has too much material for a stub but if you disagree put the stub tag back in (it must have had one once).
I would say this article had been filled in by a certain Corsican musical group that likes to meddle in Wikipedia, whom I've had to remove from other articles on Corsica. First of all, fellows, your English is terrible, certainly nowhere good enough to write on the English Wikipedia. I would suggest the French, Italian or Corsican Wikipedia. Second, you seem to be confusing encyclopedia-writing with song-writing. We aren't interested in your emotional impact or your poetry and besides you may be able to do that in Corsican or French but you don't really understand the English mentality. Your images don't necessarily appeal to us. And finally you seem to be under the impression that you are doing yourselves a publicity favor by inserting yourselves into these Corsica articles. Unfortunately unpolished and unplanned publicity is apt to have the opposite effect. I don't get the feeling that we are impressed by your great personalities; rather, you seem to me anyway rude, illiterate, clumsy and infantile. Now Elvis, he had the voice and the movements, and Liberace, he had the grand suavity and glittering style as well as the ability to play the piano. Whatever you got must only be appreciated by Corsicans. All I am suggesting is that Wikipedia is not the appropriate vehicle to present you and you are doing yourselves more harm than good by meddling here and although we have intense teen-age girls too and lots of rebels with or without causes they don't go searching through Wikipedia for elderly Corsican father-figures mooning chansons d'amour, so get out of our hair and stay out, will you?Dave (talk) 20:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removal of tags
Talk:Sidney Korshak

message: well well...I'm not going to say much except perhaps we should merge the two editors contribs so far, and of course we are keeping an anonymous IP for this one thats for sure!!! As it stands the one edit rewrite is not exactly in line with how wikipedia articles are constructed, but many of its points could be included in a merge of the two main editors on the page so far.64.38.45.110.47 15:11, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nihal Arthanayake

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nihal%28DJ%29 
Should it be merged together?  Eleanor909 11:15, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Nihal's page

message: is it really appropriate to refer to this as a controversy? It sounds like GB news took issue with something he said based on their political agenda- it wasn't widely regarded as controversial unless i am missing something. If no one responds, I will remove this section and incorporate it into another part of the page. Mr Blumenthal (talk) 23:36, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy?
Talk:Government Pension Fund of Norway

message: The lemma should be changed to Petroleum Fund of Norway or Norwegian Petroleum Fund, in my view. Likedeeler 15:22, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: Hi,
I think the numbers re size are wrong. AFAICS, the source gives numbers in billion, not trillion dollars, and this tallies with official numbers released by the national bank/government. I.e., the numbers are one order of magnitude too high. 800-something billion dollars/ 7400- something milliarder NOK, as of october 2015.
T 88.89.219.147 (talk) 04:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong numbers? 

message: The article should say when the pension fund was created. I cannot found it!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.229.174.78 (talk) 16:18, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  date 

message: The article states that the surplus is invested, but doesn't seem to say to what end (or at least is it not obvious if it does). What happens to the interest earned from the investments? Do they spend it? Or is it reinvested? In which case what is the point? Jayarava (talk) 22:35, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, the government made its first withdrawal in 2016, and can withdraw up to 3% of the fund's value each year. Firebrace (talk) 01:04, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proceeds 

message: Alphabet Inc. was announced that it would appear in October 2, 2015 1:00:11 AM.--69.209.0.192 (talk) 19:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Alphabet Inc.]] in October 2, 2015 1:00:11 AM 

message: It has a "leader group", ledergruppen that includes eiendomssjefen . 89.8.158.90 (talk) 04:16, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organisation
Talk:Mian family of Baghbanpura

message: The reference section of this article is in need of a proper look and fixing by someone with appropriate expertise, it does not seem to be properly organised and arranged and some of the references cited also need to be organised and cited better, no page numbers are given as per Wiki standards and its quite confusing , please fix. AsadUK200 (talk) 06:54, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Sir Percival Willoughby

message: Proposed merger of content with Percival_Willoughby
As the originator of the Sir_Percival_Willoughby page I fully concur the two pages should be merged as proposed because they refer to the same person.  
I would suggest this one Sir_Percival_Willoughby remains the master page purely as it predates the Percival_Willoughby page by two months and has the fuller title.  Also I know the Sir Percival page is embedded in other articles but I suspect that also applies in both cases.
I don't know how to do this or I would have done it!
Johnrnew 15:30, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:National Theater and Concert Hall, Taipei

message: I've got us started with National Theater and Concert Hall. There's plenty more to say. It would be good to add more about the physical details, particularly performance spaces and acoustics. I will try to add details about performers as I get them.
Where can I learn more about the classes of articles that exist here? I need to learn what 'Start class' is along with FA, A and the rest.
I will try to help with the other Taiwan articles as I get the chance. I want to create some biographical articles for Taiwanese artists and musicians. The Wiki content is limited to folk and pop genres right now. There's more going on. I'll do what I can to help with that, too.
Alton 15:25, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You could check :Category:Wikipedia 1.0 assessments to know criteria of each article class. Besides, I am glad to see someone is willing and has the ability to contribute in articles of Taiwanese artists and performers. I did not do so because of my limited knowledge to those performers. I wish your success. --scchiang 17:08, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

message: Is the transition from martial law in the 1990s and the free election of Lee Teng-Hui relevant to the administration of the arts center?  Would it be sufficent to say that in 1999, the governing boards of the organiations were consolidated?Goldnpuppy (talk) 21:34, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 
Talk:Kunta Kinteh Island

message: There is currently a request for comments at Talk:The Gambia on whether to capitalize the definite article in the country name. Feel free to participate in the discussion. Jafeluv (talk) 05:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC: The Gambia or the Gambia 
Talk:Yul Kwon

message: Born place in text is different from the Born place under photo, I dont know, which is correct. }I think New York, but have no resource).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.239.229.32 (talk) 21:45, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Born place 

message: I removed the maintenance tags, as there have been about 3 years and 150 edits since they were added.  If they are replaced, please note here what specifically needs to be fixed or improved to make it more clear. Joshua Scott (talk) 22:04, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: We could start by removing all the YouTube videos in the references.  I do not believe that YouTube counts as a WP:RS. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:35, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintenance tags 
Talk:Alfa Romeo 158/159 Alfetta

message: Should "159" be included in the title of this article, similar to the way in which both "4CL" and "4CLT" are included in the title of Maserati 4CL and 4CLT? i.e. should this article be renamed as "Alfa Romeo 158/159" or "Alfa Romeo 158 and 159" or maybe even "Alfetta 158/159"? I'm concerned that people will see "159" linked to Alfa Romeo 158 and think it's a mistake. Normally, I would just leave this article called "Alfa Romeo 158" and create a redirect to it called "Alfa Romeo 159", but Alfa Romeo 159 is an existing article about a different car (a road car). -- DH85868993 07:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could be good idea to rename the title, maybe Alfa Romeo 158/159 Alfetta --Typ932 07:49, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. DH85868993 23:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: In the article the last win is said to have occurred at the Merano Grand Prix in 1953. I have been searching, but can't find any information about this supposed Formula One race. What I did find was a sports car race at Merano on September 6, 1953, called "Gran Premio Supercortemaggiore". This was won by Fangio in an Alfa Romeo 6C 3000 CM Spider. 
I suspect that the information about a last win for the Alfetta in 1953 is faulty and that it never raced again after the 1951 season. --KaptenKrater (talk) 20:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep I have been also wondering this but its sourced from Alfa Romeo book (mentioned in sources, Borgeson, Griffith. The Alfa Romeo Tradition), maybe it is error on book, I have tried also to find confirmation on internet but cant find any, espceailly I have been trying to find all results from that Merano race, if it had more clasess than  the class where 6c was driven. --Typ932 T·C 11:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The book has on page 203 race results and it says 1953 G.P di Merano Italy J.M. Fangio (place:) I (Car type) 159  --Typ932 T·C 11:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Win at Merano 

message: OK, so is it 1497cc or 1479cc?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura  13:16, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Must be typo all sources I check says 1479cc  --Typ932 T·C 14:23, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size matters