lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Seneca Lake wine trail

message: This reads like a brochure from the Seneca Lake Tourist Board. Al 15:32, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
:A google search shows that it's a copyright violation. I'm marking it as such. Whitejay251 11:54, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No wonder it reads like a brochure then. I've sent you an e-mail to confirm, once I hear back from you, I'll remove the copyvio tag and probably work the text a bit so that it fits wikipedia's accepted style better. Whitejay251 18:04, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: OTRS
Talk:Kleve

message: Suggest moving this to Kleve - I've never heard Cleves used for anything more recent than Anne!  Gerry Lynch 16:13, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I came to the talk page to make virtually the same comment!  I think having the article here really is rather anachronistic, a bit like having Regensburg at Ratisbon, Aachen at Aix-la-Chapelle, or Speyer at Spires.  The medieval state has a separate article anyway, at Duchy of Cleves.  Silverhelm 08:08, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

message: Kleve was and is no part of the Netherlands.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.176.233.91 (talk) 15:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch name 

message: Two sentences in the "History" section made unsourced and apparently false claims, viz.:
* that spelling reform in the 1930s forced a change from "Cleve" to "Kleve"
* that the CDU in 2008 announced it would change the spelling back to "Cleve"
These claims went unsourced. I have these objections: 
* According to Spelling reform#German the key dates in changing German spelling have been 1901 and 1996. 
* The CDU in Kleve continues to spell the city name with a K. Here are the website of the CDU in Kleve, the district council members' website, and the Kleve CDU district council Facebook page. (Only the Facebook map spells it with a C.) — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 00:24, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed claims about name spelling
Talk:Kleve (district)

message: Suggest moving this to Kleve (district) - I've never heard Cleves used for anything more recent than Anne!  Gerry Lynch 16:13, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this suggestion, and for the same reason. -- Picapica 12:42, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

message: The coat of arms description does not match the image. Is the image backwards, or is the description wrong? Ksnow (talk) 21:22, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: You may want to read "Dexter and sinister" (which is linked twice in the article. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 09:34, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Coat of arms description
Talk:Kukri

message: Khukuri is a primary weapons of Nepalese people.I suggest creater to give an exact information about the country of origin. 2400:1A00:BD11:1818:BCD4:231D:5F2A:FB66 (talk) 14:48, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There are no references of any similar implements in any surrounding areas of the subcontinent either. The Khukuri has, by all measures, been exclusively associated with the Nepalese people and region. Srsh101 (talk) 05:41, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the creater mention indian subcontinent and not county Nepal?
Talk:Coping With

message: Would it be possible to include some book covers from Peter Corey's website [] as fair use, or maybe by scanning covers of books? Would this violate copyright or be fair use? Smurrayinchester 16:36, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

message: How is Coping With a spin-off of Horrible Histories?? If not, where should it be redirected to? --Coin945 (talk) 06:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spin-Off
Talk:David Burns (actor)

message: I removed the bit about first debuting on broadway in 1922 in the show Polly Preferred cause I couldn't find anything to back it up. In fact the IDBD shows that Polly Preferred didn't even run until 1923. There also seems to be a bit of confusion about birth date. The IMDB has him listed as being born in 1901.. ever other reference says 1902. I went with 1902. --J E Bailey 16:40, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: polly preferred
Talk:Hegelian principle

message: Hegel referred to the dialectical three-step when he discussed Kant's threefold categorical divisions. He did not, in this way, provide the key that unlocks the mysterious essence of world events.
152.163.100.12 16:39, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

message: This article was redirected to Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 00:43, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:List of people from Massachusetts

message: Recently created, is List of Famous people from Massachusetts (which came into existence from the article on Massachusetts--because the listing within the Massachusetts article was impairing that article). It looks like the new "famous" list should be merged, and this list article, the older "List of people from Massachusetts" surviving, since it follows the title, form and categories of similar lists for other states. -- Yellowdesk 20:05, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merger accomplished March 14, 2007, with this edit  by User:Otto4711. The "list of Famous people from Massachusetts" is now a redirect. Editing to properly  integrate the two lists is now desirable. -- Yellowdesk 04:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, yes it is.  I was just about to ask about that. - Denimadept (talk) 23:01, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Proposed
 merger, with "List of people from Massachusetts" surviving. 

message: I think this section needs to be deleted.  The only person in it put himself there and his article is written like an advert.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dough007 (talk • contribs) 06:37, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interior Design? 

message: Is it intentional that some names are listed twice? For instance, John F. Kennedy, Edward Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Tip O'Neil, and possibly others are listed in two different sections. Thanks KConWiki (talk) 20:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication of names?

message: Why is Ruth Pointer listed? Her article says nothing about Massachusetts, and it seems that whole Pointer family is actually from California. 91.154.188.185 (talk) 14:54, 28 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruth Pointer? 
Talk:Bristol Community College

message: --Armyinfantry86 (talk) 20:02, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Gutta

message: This article is currently about two entirely different topics: the abbrevitation for "drops" in pharmacy, and an architectural feature.  Shouldn't this be split into two articles?
Alynna 17:22, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Since the abbreviation is an applied use of the architectural term, it is useful here.  It's pretty much all there is to say about the abbreviation anyway.  Maybe a list of common (not hallowed) medical abbreviations could link to this article by mentioning the metaphorical origins of using gtt. to mean drops.  More importantly, the article should be at Gutta. -Acjelen 03:43, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: As I understand it, the medical abbreviation isn't from the architectural term.  Both the terms are from the Latin word for "drops".  Oh, and I only moved this because it seemed like both terms were used mostly if not exclusively in the plural.  I didn't mean to violate Wikipedia policy, sorry. --Alynna 04:36, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambig
Talk:Harry "A" Chesler

message: I thought I read somewhere that the "A" was not followed by a period because it wasn't an actual initial.  Anyone know about this?  Postdlf 17:26, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Punctuation 

message: An anon IP changed the "Jr." to a "Sr." in both the lead and in a published article's title (!) today. Despite his claims, however, and as the 6/22/2002 article "Harry "A" Chesler, Jr.: Comic Book Entrepreneur" by Jon Berk states, "Starting in 1941, Chesler books proclaimed on every [sic] cover: “Harry 'A' Chesler, Jr. World's Greatest Comics.” This is clearly visible on this cover of Bulls Eye Comics #11, and it reads "Harry "A" Chesler Jr. Features Syndicate, N.Y." on this cover of Captain Battle #3. And the publisher's indicia for Dynamic Comics reads "Harry 'A' Chesler Jr. 
I'm not sure if this was a well-meaning error or a deliberate hoax, but Chesler's own publications used "Jr." --Tenebrae (talk) 18:36, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The anon changer was not me, but I have made a similar change with hopefully sufficient citations.  I hadn't thought to post something here beforehand as the body of the article makes it clear that Harry "A" Chesler and Harry A. Chesler, Jr. were separate people, and the former was the publisher, so I figured I was just fixing a typo. I can dig up further evidence if needed. It's a very frequent error. The Statement that I referenced lists them both as separate people.  Jr. is listed as the "owner", but Statements regularly list a family member, most often the wife, as owner for tax reasons.  -- Ixat totep (talk) 01:43, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Jr.

message: Another editor and I have added biographical information based on work by David Saunders at http://www.pulpartists.com/. While this is a self-published site, Saunders is an acknowledged, published author in the fields of pulps and other popular-press magazines: https://www.amazon.com/David-Saunders/e/B0047D3KI0. --Tenebrae (talk) 17:01, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: David Saunders
Talk:McGarvie model

message: Road to a Republic says that "The only eligibility requirement for a head of state under the 
'McGarvie Model' would be Australian citizenship because the process for selecting the head of state is designed to ensure a non-political head of state" referenced to Mr Jack Hammond QC and Ms Juliette Brodksy, Submission 719, page 7 &14-15.
However I am not sure thats the logic McGarvie used.
--Dlatimer 17:32, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Eligibility Requirement

message: The article is a summary of these two sources. If the editor who placed the citation tag could point out where there is confusion, it will be easy to resolve the issue raised. --Lawe (talk) 03:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation Tag

message: Wikpedia attempts to improve its reliability by asking for citations within the text rather than at the bottom as generalised references.  This becomes a requirement for articles assessed to B and above. This can mean repeated references to 1 or 2 sources, but then at least the sourcing is clear.--Grahame (talk) 03:44, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As the sourcing is clear, straightforward, general referencing is acceptable and there is no challenge to the material (Wikipedia:Citing_sources#General_reference), could you please be more specific. --Lawe (talk) 04:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[McGarvie Model]]
Talk:List of content management frameworks

message: I've a doubt: adding a CMFramework I'm working on to this list, even if it's OpenSource, it's like advertising? I could do it?
Folletto 17:34, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say don't do it. Wait for someone else. alerante ✆ 20:32, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, perfect. Thanks for the reply. :) Folletto 21:04, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

message: I'm trying to organize the various types of software frameworks, and I would appreciate input from contributors to this article as well. See Talk:Software framework#Software framework taxonomy
Ian Bailey 05:13, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Software framework [[taxonomy]] 

message: How is a "Content Management Framework" different than a Web Application Framework?  CMF seems more like a marketing term, at least at this point.  I see little use of CMF in cite-able sources like news articles (almost none) or journals (far less than WAF).
From a practical standpoint the distinction between "content" and "web application" seems small - wouldn't most of the systems listed do just as well for supporting customized web apps as they do for managing existing content?
Beyond that there are no proper cites here, and the reference for the quote (the non-citable drupal page) doesn't have that quote at it any more.  Something needs to change.....  ★NealMcB★ (talk) 17:55, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. "I'm looking for something to help me develop a website, so what do I want, a CMS, a CMF or a Web Application Framework?" It seems they are at least to a large extend overlapping. Therefore I also suggest a merger. If needed on the list page an extra column can specify if some system / framework would fall in the category of CMS, CMF or Web Application Framework.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.78.165.201 (talk) 08:51, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree. Please merge as suggested. --Jesus Presley (talk) 06:22, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

text:  I agree. Please merge as suggested. GlennKook (talk) 00:15, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Web Application Framework]]?
Talk:Lule River

message: This article refers to a language named Lule Sami in the opening paragraph, but refers to it as Lule Saami in the info box. The article on the language itself calls it Lule Sámi. Perhaps this article should consistently use the Lule Sámi spelling of the language name, including the acute accent, to match the article about it? StevenDoerfler (talk) 14:23, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent spelling of the language Lule Sámi
Talk:Novatian

message: There is additional material at the EB 1911 at Novatianus if anyone would like to integrate that info.  --DanielCD 17:44, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Near the beginning of the section entitled "Life", there is a paragraph of Pope Cornelius describing how Novatian supposedly was possessed by Satan. This paragraph has no citations, and is in real need of them, considering that Cornelius was an enemy of Novatian (Novatian opposed Cornelius becoming Bishop of Rome, and that was the catalyst of the schism).
Can someone find a source for that paragraph, as well as not rely on Novatian's arch nemesis as a source (at least more than necessary)? --1990'sguy (talk) 21:41, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs improvements 

message: Birth date is "" here, but on Italian Wikipedia it's "". Anyone know which it should be? If you figure it out, it's also c.200 at Wikidata. —Sam Wilson 07:53, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date?
Talk:List of French islands in the Indian and Pacific oceans

message: I have a question: Why is French Polynesia an "Overseas collectivity entitled overseas country", as it is written now in this article in the section "Pacific Islands"? Shouldn't we remove at least the expression "Overseas collectivity" since French Polynesia is not a Collectivité d'outre-mer but a Pays d'outre-mer (and a former Territoire d'outre-mer)? As the information is written now here in this article Islands controlled by France in the Indian and Pacific oceans, it contradicts the information in article French overseas departments and territories. -- Citylover 18:08, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is French polynesia an "Overseas collectivity entitled overseas country"? 

message: ta  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.32.125.221 (talk) 09:48, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  map'dbnice..
Talk:Secretary of the United States Senate

message: Contradiction is that current secretary, Nancy Erickson was appointed and this is an elected office according to this article. TonyTheTiger 18:50, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, she was appointed to an elected office.  Under the rules of the Senate, the office of Secretary of the Senate is elected (Erickson was elected by S.Res. 8 (http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.+Res.+8:).  However, by agreement of the two parties, the Majority Leader gets to "appoint" the Secretary of the Senate, and the election is mearly ceremonial. meamemg 01:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please explain this in the article. TonyTheTiger 20:13, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:Beinn Eighe

message: I think this article could do with a picture of the triple buttress, anybody got one? Gillean666 18:09, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Corrie

message: I corrected the grammatically impossible form shown formerly on the site, which was a mixture of singular and plural forms. It is either "Sgurr an Fhir Dhuibh" (of the black man) or "Sgurr nam Fear Duibh(e)" (of the black men), but can't possibly be a mixture of the two as was shown originally. Would someone be able to check whether the actual placename contains a singular or plural form?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.176.79.109 (talk) 20:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's "Sgurr nan Fhir Duibhe", I believe. Using the (admittedly not always conclusive) Google test gives 131 hits for that, but only one (this article!) for "Sgurr an Fhir Dhuibh". I found a guide to Gaelic place-names that gives the former form, along with the the modern local Gaelic ("Sgùrr nam Fear Dubha") and English ("the peak of the black men"). On these bases, I shall edit to "Sgurr nan Fhir Duibhe". I don't speak Gaelic, however, so I'll willingly stand corrected if anyone knows better. Loganberry (Talk) 19:36, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Umm... It may be that it's marked as Sgurr nan Fhir Duibhe on English maps (in which case the name should stay, possible with an explanation) but Sgurr nan Fhir Duibhe is definitely wrong, either in old or modern Gaelic. Based on the name, it seems most likely that it is "Sgurr an Fhir Duibh" (the plural would have yielded Sgurr nam Fear Dubha, not duibhe). And yes, I'm a fluent Gaelic speaker :) Akerbeltz (talk) 21:43, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The 1:50,000 Landranger OS map definitely has "Sgurr nan Fhir Duibhe". You can see it at the extreme right of the map shown at this Streetmap.co.uk link. It looks as though you may have to take the OS's lack of Gaelic skills up with them! Loganberry (Talk) 14:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There are too many OS manglings of Gaelic spellings to too even think about. Akerbeltz is right on all points of grammar. The OS are a citable authority on topology, not language.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.36.76.210 (talk) 12:00, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Sgurr an Fhir Dhuibh

message: The photograph is moss campion, not purple saxifrage Northern rock (talk) 11:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flora and fauna
Template talk:The Holocaust sidebar

message: Just "edited boldly" and changed the Remembrance section as follows, using two links:
:*Days of remembrance
:*Memorials and museums
:This change answers the question I raised in the previous section plus concerns of Milhist74.
:Hope it looks good to others! NearTheZoo (talk) 03:48, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remembrance 

message: This template should contain a link to the Joint Declaration by Members of the United Nations, the first Allied acknowledgement of the Holocaust, but I don't see any relevant section in this template. Raul654 (talk) 20:06, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe Aftermath? Jayjg (talk) 20:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that it happened in 1942, well before the worst atrocities, that seems very odd placement. Raul654 (talk) 00:12, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

text: I think "Allied response" is good, and those articles are good choices. Germany and Italy were also Western countries. Jayjg (talk) 19:30, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joint Declaration 

message: I thought I would take a minute to explain to you why I have introduced changes to this template. One reason for changing the templates is to improve accessibility for visually impaired users using a screen reader. Whenever a screen reader encounters a dot, it calls out the word "dot". The material presents as a lot of tiny disjointed paragraphs rather than a list. With the new mark-up, the screen reader will announce that a list is coming, and then will proceed to read out the items on the list. Application of the hlist and plainlist class is about presenting the material as actual lists, which helps not just people with vision issues, but those viewing the site using phones and other non-traditional devices. Search engines also will read lists better.The use of the dots is now deprecated, and have been since August. Each dot requires the application of a template, and templates are expensive, as they increase server load. There are limits as to how many templates can be placed on a page. Application of the latest method, using plainlist to create the lists, results in a reduction in post-expand include size of 22% and a reduction in template argument size of 24% on this template. This is a substantial improvement that will lead to quicker load times for pages and a better experience for our viewing audience.The transition has not been trouble free; some kinks have had to be ironed out, and there may still be a ways to go. However, we have the templates displaying adequately in the two latest versions of the problematic Internet Explorer (IE8 and IE9),  and we can't hold back development of Wikipedia for older, buggy browsers. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, -- Dianna (talk)—Preceding undated comment added at 06:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes to the template 

message: There is a discussion at Template talk:The Holocaust (end) which may affect the naming of this template. --NSH002 (talk) 07:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice: possible move
Talk:Crawford Beveridge

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 00:14, 20 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate
Talk:Master-planned community

message: What is your justificiation for the revert, David? —B|Talk
1. Master-planned community is a better title than Master Planned Community
2. There is no effective article at Master Planned Community (which I directed to New town, just like planned community), where there is a longer more thorough article. 
We had this discussion on Talk:New town I think about the appropriate title or one article or several. dml 22:56, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Sintran

message: As far as I know, Sintran II was only a real time system, made for the Nord-1 and early Nord-10s. As the name itself tells us, Nord TSS was the time-sharing system for those models. Sintran III was based on both TSS and Sintran II.
195.159.17.130 (talk) 13:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sintran II
Talk:Borderland

message: I would think there should be a disambig page here, it seems like a natural target for bad links. Looking at Special:Whatlinkshere/Borderland, I don't see that many at the moment (Krajina is clearly wrong), but still, not a good idea. Noel (talk) 19:09, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: I'm wondering if this page should be merged with the disambiguation page borderlands (note the 's', please).
I think it should.
Lots42 10:01, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Borderland and Borderlands are both very small disambiguation pages. --96.243.180.163 (talk) 14:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borderlands