Talk:Hyperforin

message: Right now the molecules look identical.
91.158.185.124 (talk) 02:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, also tetrahydrohyperforin.  They are identical depictions, so are certainly not different names.  Suggest removing them from the table, or creating the correct models. 2605:A000:140A:42A7:3C4F:CE83:510F:C826 (talk) 23:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's the difference between hyperforin and Octahydrohyperforin? 

message: Can the part about it supposedly being an MAOI citing a resource from 1999 be removed, new evidence shows it is almost certainly an reuptake inhibitor, later stated in the page; the whole thing is contradictory.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.88.144 (talk) 16:43, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAOI or reuptake inhibitor 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hyperforin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221151528/http://mmsl.cz/viCMS/soubory/pdf/IN_PRESS_18102013_Imreova.pdf to http://mmsl.cz/viCMS/soubory/pdf/IN_PRESS_18102013_Imreova.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:09, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: User:Zefr did some cleanup in this diff but I think it went a bit too far. The article no longer mentions the believed primary MOA (binding to and activating TRPC6) and the biochemistry/pharmacology section is now barren. The lead was also changed to "there is little evidence that hyperforin and St. John's wort have any effect on depression" which is blatantly false (see this 2016 meta analysis). Frankly I feel like reverting many of the deletions. 
Could I get some feedback, perhaps from User:Medgirl131 and User:Jytdog?
— Erik.Bjareholt (talk) 08:43, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I readded slightly rephrased versions of the (hopefully non-controversial) stuff in this diff. – Erik.Bjareholt (talk) 09:07, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted as outdated primary research. Left a note on Erik's talk page. --Zefr (talk) 16:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: That's fair I guess, although I still think it's a shame the scope of Wikipedia is limited in this fashion, since I know no other Wiki for stuff like this. Thanks for adding the new section, greatly appreciated. --Erik.Bjareholt (talk) 06:19, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent cleanup considered overzealous 

message: The text seems to say the opposite of what the table shows or maybe I don't know how it works, usually in articles that talk about inhibitory drugs like SSRIs the Ki value is used in the table and the lower the value the greater the inhibition instead in this case we are talking about IC50 so I suppose that the higher value means higher inhibition.--Unvers (talk) 10:18, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The chapter on pharmacodynamics is unclear