lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Reading (legislature)

message: There's not enough meat in each concept to warrant their own article. They should probably be merged into one article. Suggestions for article name would be welcome. Duckbill 16:35, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: How about "Reading (legislature)" ? Duckbill 17:47, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

text: OK, we've had a week with no suggestions to the contrary, so I'm going to merge them. Duckbill 02:04, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge First, Second, and Third reading 

message: OK. I have drawn up a first cut. This is basically the content lifted from "First reading", "Second reading", and "Third reading". I have cobbled together a first paragraph which gives an overall summary. Duckbill 23:31, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First cut 

message: Is this really a necessary issue when it predominantly, if not ONLY, applies to the US, Canada, and England?  It covers those. 67.76.32.253 07:15, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a lot countries that have a version of this system, though most are Westminster based i think - including Australia and New Zealand, Ireland, Australian state legislatures, possibly India from memory. But I'm not sure the concepts vary significantly, so perhaps we should refocus the article on the concepts of different readings having different functions, and only have a section at the end of the article on how they work in practice in particular jurisdictions. hamiltonstone (talk) 02:15, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalization?
Talk:Romanization of Belarusian

message: I think is write in this way to mention.
: Romanization means conversion to the Latin (Roman) alphabet.  Romanianization, or Rumanization, is something else.  —Michael Z. 2006-02-14 22:39 Z
Anonymous, I reverted your revert to an earlier version.  My original edit summary covered the problems with table formatting, but I didn't mention some other problems: that the new location of note references changed the scope of the notes which applied specifically to Łacinka, and not to the Cyrillic letters in general, and that the table formatting made the main article headings pile up on the right side of the tables in my web browser (Safari/Mac).  —Michael Z. 2006-02-14 22:51 Z
I don't understand the reason of the undeletion. The message I deleted wasn't based on any official info, was misleading and promotional. None of the other systems' entries carry a promotional message with them. This isn't a comparison of systems but an index. So why undeletion? Yury Tarasievich 21:30, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: isn't it: ROMANIANIZATION of Belarusian?
Talk:Susan Constant

message: Why was it named that, any1 know?
I don't, but also curiously, there is a Sarah Constant shrine in the Ocean View area of Norfolk, Virginia which is somehow related. Vaoverland 00:09, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the articel that's a misspelling, or something... 68.39.174.238 08:56, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The infobox states that the Susan Constant was a full-rigged ship, but the picture doesn't show a ship rig. It's a brig, I think. (The article for Godspeed has the same error.) BPMullins | Talk 02:25, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rig 

message: I just wish to confirm, is the reason for the use of the Flag of Great Britain (pre-1801 Union Jack), as opposed to the St George's Cross, because King James had decreed that ships still identify as English whilst still flying the British flag?   UnknownBrick22 (talk) 00:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag displayed in info box
Talk:Estella (Great Expectations)

message: I have searched through nearly 20 website and gone through every encyclopedia, dictionary, and naming book i could find. In absolutley NONE of these does it say what on earth the name Estella means. Is it "devil's child" or "false hope"? who knows! I sure don't. I'm 14 so I can't really do anything about it, but someone needs to find out what this name means! Please and thank you.
:Might be a big late, but Estella stems from the root "stella" meaning star. -- 05:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading

message: can we have a picture of her, please?. THX.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.8.240 (talk) 23:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: lol 80.123.210.172 (talk) 10:06, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture 

message: In the section "Estella and Pip's pre-adult life," someone wrote that they met in "jewish day school". I haven't read Great Expectations in years, but I'm pretty sure this isn't true, so someone added this as a joke. Can someone confirm this?
75.56.214.228 (talk) 07:16, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jewish school?
Talk:Empire (2005 TV series)

message: I’ve made this article as I recently finished watching this miniseries in New Zealand, and I was surprised to see there was nothing on it here. This is my first attempt at writing a large article. I hope it isn’t too inaccurate – I’ve used a few sites to help out, but there isn’t a huge amount of info on the net about it. IMDB proved helpful, though. The plot section can definitely do with some expansion, my memory of it isn’t perfect, and I’ve left many parts out that I’m not sure of. There’s plenty of other info that could be added too, like when it was broadcast, and a picture or two would be nice.
Hopefully others can help expand it into a much better article, and tidy up any mistakes I may have made. Richard001 23:39, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First attempt at article

message: what is the accuracy of Tyrannus? i would like some information about him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sp0 (talk • contribs) 22:22, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well as it says at the beginning, "Octavius is helped in his quest by a fictitious gladiator called Tyrannus (Jonathan Cake)." Richard001 (talk) 11:12, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tyrannus 

message: "Although he was not as brutal as Mark Antony in warfare, he was much more so than Caesar." This seems like opinion, Caesar commited what the modern era would concider autrocities all the time. Could we get a source for this maybe?192.250.175.26 (talk) 05:05, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  More brutal then Caesar!? 
Talk:Comanche campaign

message: First of all, virtually all military historians call the Plains campaign the Red River War, not the Comanche Campaign.  Secondly, of the 4 battles listed for this "campaign" 3 of them had nothing to do with the Comanche or Kiowa, and not a member of either tribe was present at any of those battles!  This article needs to be deleted. JohninMaryland (talk) 04:34, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree 100%. The referenced USACMH link isn't accurately framed here at all. The Army awarded campaign streamers in this way to acknowledge the far-flung nature of troop assignments during the Frontier period. Linking this to the Sioux Wars is likewise inaccurate.Intothatdarkness (talk) 16:33, 16 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Entire article is wrong historically

message: This recent addition needs to be sourced. It's also not especially accurate when it comes to the history of this very generic conflict (as noted in the previous comments).Intothatdarkness (talk) 21:43, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I did some work in the section, but it needs much more attention. In fact, I almost want to submit it for deletion.Intothatdarkness (talk) 16:46, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Just reading the article and made a couple edits, but I don't want to spend too much time on it if it's going to be deleted.  Adding a couple links that may be relevant to this or future articles:
* http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/articles/bmqvb
* http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Quahadi
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quanah_Parker
* see also: Talk:Salt Creek Prairie Massacre
* — Ched :  ?  20:19, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

text: Thanks, Ched! I've got some good paper sources on this, too, but in all honesty the main article should likely be broken up and merged with some other stuff we have. The first section really relates to a campaign against the Kiowa, not the Comanche, and the last section properly goes with the Red River War (which was a coordinated campaign against both the Kiowa and Comanche). The current title implies that these operations were all part of one grand, long-term campaign, when in fact they were not. Intothatdarkness 20:46, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Addition 

message: This section really doesn't belong in this article, as it deals with operations against the Kiowa. I'm seriously considering removing it.Intothatdarkness 14:08, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there was no comment, I'm going BOLD and removing that section. Intothatdarkness 14:08, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins Section
Talk:Fort Sumner

message: This page needs a little help with language, but the ideas are good. Related subject is the Long Walk of the Navajo.  I will do an edit and make comments on any major changes below. Please comment. --Rcollman 10:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: "Since it housed "combatants", it was not a concentration camp.Cazedessus (talk) 16:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It "housed" some Navajo's who fought the United States Army and "citizens".  It also "housed" women and children and old men, who were definitely not combatants. The majority of the Navajo and Apaches who were "escorted" to Ft. Sumner were non-combatants.  Please note, some people do not recognize a difference between a reservation and a concentration camp. --Rcollman (talk) 21:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  A further comment 

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 
Talk:Brighton trunk murders

message: Almost everything here is wrong! will write up as soon as I get a chance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.14.82.136 (talk • contribs) 
:I've started rewriting this, since I have several sources available, although it may take some time. Rodhullandemu 00:40, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Inaccurate
Talk:Flemington, Victoria

message: Removed the see also to City of Essendon. Though Flemington was briefly part of City of Essendon, it broke away in 1882, and since then due to ever-changing boundaries and council names, has been in three different cities in the century that followed. Format (talk) 05:08, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it seems to have split away into its own Borough of Flemington and Kensington in 1882, then became part of City of Melbourne in 1905 and is still for the most part there. The confusion arises as one tiny bit of it was kept in the City of Essendon, which ended up in Moonee Valley. Orderinchaos 05:59, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes except most of the suburb is in City of Moonee Valley now; only a small corner in the Sout hEast is still in City of Melbourne. Should this all be added to the article? Format (talk) 06:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably should, yeah. Orderinchaos 06:37, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sounds like the 'See also' section ought to have links to City of Essendon, Borough of Flemington and Kensington and City of Melbourne - or a section that sets out its history of within each LGA - dates, etc. so that its history is accurately portrayed. The other question of course is what effect does this have on the articles on City of Essendon, BoF&K, CoM, etc. - ideally they'd reflect this history too. Its something that will crop up in a number of other articles as well. Eyedubya (talk) 07:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, I see you've already added this to the article - any chance of some references? Eyedubya (talk) 07:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

text:  The CoE and CoM articles already contained the information with references, the BoF&K article doesn't/didn't exist, mainly because it existed solely before 1915 and hence I couldn't get meaningful info on it (the State Library of Victoria only has back to 1915 for the Municipal Directories) Orderinchaos 08:07, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for adding the references. The dinnerbell rang while I was working on the pages. Format (talk) 08:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[City of Essendon]]
Talk:Russell Means

message: So as a Navajo of the four corners area, (AZ, UT, NM, CO.) RUSSELL MEANS never considered himself as a “native”, but as an AMERICAN INDIAN, Lloyd House Phd was the 1st U.S. American  Indian Arizona state representative, also an Indian activist defined himself as a American Indian. Not this WOKE generation of young naive natives…Russell Means in his later years married into the Navajo tribe. Dr. House quoted Russell Means’ “American Indians”, not Native Indians, the older generation of Indians always referred to themselves  as American Indians. Mateo-navaho (talk) 07:32, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: , I appreciate your perspective. I respect your position and agree with it concerning Russell Means. He, like many, considered himself an American Indian. What I will not do is isolate a portion of our Indigenous community here on Wikipedia or in life because they associate with other terms. How can we expect others who know nothing of the complex issues that various Tribes encounter to respect each of our Nations if we do not, first, respect each other? It starts with us. Young and old. In life, it begins with our storytellers and our teachers. From there it is passed to the younger generations. On Wikipedia it begins with experienced editors and new editors alike finding the accurate and verifiable sources to bring Wikipedia in line with all perspectives so that each one is represented and respected. Neither is always easy to do. That's why it takes many of us working together as a community of editors with our own unique viewpoints. Thank you for sharing yours. --ARoseWolf 16:12, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NATIVE AMERICAN
Talk:D-Reaper

message: Digimon Tamers, English episodes 38 - 51.  Orginally Broadcasted 2003 - 2004 on Fox Network (US.)  Information based on dialouge and on what was directly observed.--Eldarone 15:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for D-Reaper 

message: There's a good source of pictures on the Digimon Encyclopedia website by Chris McFeely - it's the official ones too, with no watermarks or anything.KrytenKoro 03:33, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures 

message: The page's equivalent on the Digimon Wiki is currently going through a big cleanup, and we're planning on synchronizing the pages when we get done. Because of Konaka's site, we have a lot of development info for this character, so if we can get some more reception sources (From across the web), and we can get the description bits cleaned up - we might be able to get this article to Good or even Featured. If you're interested, please show up at [digimon.wikia.com/wiki/D-Reaper this link] to help out.Not even Mr. Lister's Koromon survived intact. 19:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Featured
Talk:Reno-Sparks Indian Colony

message: I think this article has too much general Native American history of relations with the US that do not much tell the reader about how this Indian colony specifically developed and what its people's lives were and are like. I am going to edit the more detailed portions about eastern events. There is too much to take in here before you get to the development of the colony itself.Parkwells (talk) 14:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Too much general history
Talk:Kensington, Victoria

message: Image of Kensington taken from the Footscray side of the Maribyrnong river.
 Xyxyzyz 
(talk) 07:43, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image - Maribyrnong River and rail bridge
Talk:Parkville, Victoria

message: Just saw this, why was that crimerate addition undone? Sure, it was poorly written, but hardly unimportant, one would think?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.118.182 (talk) 12:36, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Untitled] 

message: The Northern Market. Ypna (talk) 02:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Material for potential expansion of History section
Talk:South Yarra

message: Come on guys, I'm sure an area like South Yarra has had a BIT more than a few recent murders happen in the last 150-odd years! I'd add more if I had access to a Melbourne library, but I'm in Perth. Orderinchaos78 09:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I moderate the Culture Victoria website and have added an external link to a images and information about Como House and its owners.--Eleworth (talk) 05:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As concerned this link may have appeared to be spamming I have removed it. --Eleworth (talk) 07:50, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New External Link added 
Talk:A4018 road

message: Hi 81.106.249.225, this is regarding the PROD you insist on replacing. If you can't sign in, I will take this to AFD per your request. If you can, please do so yourself. I don't like revert warring, so I'll wait for a few days before I reset the PROD timer. 23:58, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: PLease do so.  Though I feel your accusations of bullying when you haven't even provide a good reason for disputing deletion make you very much the pot to my kettle.
I have reinstated the article - there was an AfD debate in 2006 here, the result of which was Keep.  It has been expanded (a little) since then.Mhockey (talk) 11:19, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

text: Two-year-old AfD discussions are not binding in perpetuity.  It was kept on the basis that the article would be expanded with worthy content, and it has not.  217.36.107.9 (talk) 13:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

text: If you want to play at lawyers, I can't see anywhere in that debate where lack of worthy content is explicitly ruled out as an argument.  WP:DEL#REASON claims that not meeting WP:N or equivalent is grounds for deletion, and a cursory clance shows mostly mirrors and people giving directions - hardly non-trivial.  The last point of WP:DEL#REASON is "Any other content not suitable for an encyclopedia".  All of which is moot, since redirection is not and has not ever (in the phase3 era, at least) been deletion.  The most fundamental criterion of any article is that there is a substantial article there to be written in the first place.  If something "does not call for a long article", it's a pretty good indicator that it doesn't merit one  at all.  217.36.107.9 (talk) 12:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:West Melbourne, Victoria

message: I reckon that the coode island section cou easily be split off and made into its own article.  It is physically far from the rest of west melbourne and with its references to being australia's largest toxic waste dump somewhat lends the whole suburb an aura of undesirability.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.17.171.43 (talk) 05:55, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coode Island Removal =

message: I think Errol Street should be mentioned in the article since it is a major destination in the area.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.108.142.187 (talk) 02:36, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errol Street 
Talk:Glengarry

message: This painting is a poor illustration. I can't discern any feature of the cap; it looks like a "pillbox" hat askew. Sobolewski 21:10, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustration

message: Why is the picture "An Inspection of the Eastern Reserve Brigade Guard of Honour By President Mary McAleese on the 93rd anniversary of the 1916 Rising on O'Connell Street in Dublin", included.  No one is wearing a Glengarry. Kiltpin (talk) 12:26, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 
Talk:Mixe people

message: Hi Maunus, I've had a quick review and as would be expected you are developing this very nicely indeed! A couple of review suggestions, will make some more a bit later when I've some more time. Other than a little more copyediting for idiomatic phrasing:
*The 'history' and 'geography' sections could be swapped around, ie give the setting first then the story.
*In the 'history' section, probably need a little more to separate the presumption of Olmec precursors from the conquest-era description. Also, the assumption of Olmec relatedness should probably be qualified, and mention who proposes this
*The 'social structure' section I couldn't quite get, for eg the ref to 'mexican administration'. I know cargo system is wikilinked but it could probably do with some words in this article to explain it some more, as is presumably unfamiliar to most readers
*Could the  or similar template be used to make some of the nonstandard chars display more reliably in most folks' systems?
Just some initial thoughts. Once again, great work! Cheers, --cjllw | TALK 07:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some review suggestions 
Talk:Atsugewi language

message: Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
* Everything written is relevant to the topic.
Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
* Because this language is now a dead language, there is no information out of date.
What else could be improved?
* It's missing some citations. For example, the part about the language's last speaker has no traceable source.  
Hyowonl (talk) 00:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluating Content