Talk:Ms .45

message: According to the speedy deletion notice that was originally placed here, it may be removed once the article has been fixed and no longer qualifies for a speedy. I believe I have done so by making this into a proper stub for the movie Ms. 45. 23skidoo 00:51, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Skidoo, I agree. I am removing the notice. rowley (talk) 21:16, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy deletion notice

message: The movie is popular ; also among feminists. However it isn´t a cult film. You tell me why it is one. --ThomasK 14:18, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
: Maybe you should explain why it is not. I don't see how a film can't be both a popular feminist film and a cult film. Also, the movie is featured in the book Cult Movies 2 by Danny Peary and that should be enough justification. See also , plus  which is an article on Ms. 45 written by a journalist who covers cult cinema. There's also  which refers to the film as a cult classic. An article on Abel Ferrara here  discusses his "cult classic" I could go on. Here's an article that refers to it as a "certified cult film"  And I can cite similar examples for Avalon, too, incidentally. 23skidoo 14:24, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: category cult film

message: There are now 2 images on this page, despite the article being only one paragraph long. This article needs to be lengthened to justify 2 images. 23skidoo 18:03, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article has been lengthened with a full plot synopsis and history sections. I notice that the second image has been removed, also. rowley (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Too short for 2 images

message: Why do I bother, but hey: the title of the film is "Ms .45", not "Ms. 45".
189.130.201.31 (talk) 03:56, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct. It should be titled Ms .45 (witness the film's opening credit typography), but the correction is being blocked by Wikipedia bureaucracy. rowley (talk) 21:29, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong title

message: The film currently holds an 89% rating on Rotten Tomatoes with critics praising the film as a timeless piece of exploitation film making that over 30 years later has lost none of its impact upon the audience.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carps44 (talk • contribs) 07:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:   Reception 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Ms. 45. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140802075142/http://www.xojane.co.uk/beauty/pretty-in-the-past-zo-lund to http://www.xojane.co.uk/beauty/pretty-in-the-past-zo-lund
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140802075142/http://www.xojane.co.uk/beauty/pretty-in-the-past-zo-lund to http://www.xojane.co.uk/beauty/pretty-in-the-past-zo-lund
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018)