lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Broken Bow (Star Trek: Enterprise)

message: The series is supposed to start in a town called Broken Bow, Oklahoma, but as one who grew up there I can say with certainty that the scenery in the show was not Broken Bow.  Broken Bow lies in the foothills of the Ouachita Mountains, in southeastern Oklahoma.  It is not flat and is not full of corn.  It was founded by the Dierks Lumber Company and is surrounded by hardwood forests and Pine tree farms.  I think the show confused Broken Bow, Oklahoma with Broken Bow, Nebraska. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ronnie2054 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 15 March 2006  (UTC-8)
:The penultimate paragraph in the article Broken Bow, Oklahoma makes a similar statement, noting that "the locale in the Star Trek episode may refer to Broken Bow, Oklahoma's namesake Broken Bow, Nebraska." Glenn L (talk) 20:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Not sure to where the footnote refers. I looked but did not find.
(RRWP)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.18.168.105 (talk) 21:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnote 

message: Is that spelling (used in this article) acceptable? The linked article spells his name Zefram. Equinox ◑ 00:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling: [[Zephram Cochrane]] 

message: I've read in few places that the farmer was named Farmer Moore after Ronald D. Moore   although he is only listed as Ron King "Farmer" in the end credits. Maybe if the production section was expanded to include more details about the writing of the episodes and the other details like how the admirals (Forrest, Leonard, Williams) were named after original series actors, it could get a mention? -- 109.79.163.21 (talk) 23:10, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Farmer Moore 

message: While filming the snow scene Linda Park missed her mark, and director James Conway accidentally called her "Sushi" instead of Hoshi, and "Everybody just about died from laughter."
If the Production section were more detailed and actually mentioned the landing platform snow scene then maybe a fun anecdote like this could be included but the article is a bit too short for that at the moment. -- 109.78.208.111 (talk) 02:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sushi
Talk:Montclair, Virginia

message: The marathon should not be mentioned under geography.  It needs to be in another section or just removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Notreallyhere (talk • contribs) 15:05, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marathon 

message: Someone keeps reverting changes to the Montclair page for no apparent reason.  Let the people who lived there and know about the community have their voice, or at least explain your decisions to interfere with freedom of speech
*Please don't act like a smartass, you know why I reverted.  This is not a place to give a community a voice, it is an encyclopedia.  I'm well aware that lake montclair is brown, but this is irrelevant.  I'm well aware that many Montclair residents do not like to associate with Dumfries, but the way that it was written was not from a natural point of view.  All reverts were for irrelevant information, non natural point of view writing or vandalism.--RA64 05:51, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reverts 
Talk:William Tubman

message: " He rigged elections to stay in office until he died. He set up a brutal secret police force and a network of informers. He paved the highway as far as his country estate but no further. He made his birthday a national holiday and insisted on ever more grandiose celebrations. He was an inveterate womanizer."  The elections were also rigged.  Not everything in that quote may be true but this article is written as if this guy was some sort of hero!  He was corrupt and inept, and this article should at least hint at those basic truths.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.207.231.74 (talk) 12:15, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Prince Hall Freemasonry is not a sect. It has been an important part of North American masonry for at least two centuries. In masonic terms it is an "obedience". Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 12:19, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince Hall Freemasonry 

message: Page 8 of the 19 May 2011 Daily Observer has a sketch of Mrs Tubman ("Mrs. Antoinette Tubman is Dead: President Tubman's Widow, First Lady of Liberia 1948-1971"), who died on the previous day.  Born on 24 February 1914, Antoinette Padmore studied at an Episcopal mission in Clay=Ashland, married William Tubman on 17 September 1948, mother of Wilhelmina, operated a museum in the Executive Mansion while first lady, owned some businesses, founded the nation's first program for orphans and disabled children, the nation's first psychiatric hospital (Catherine Mills Rehabilitation Center), sponsoring Sarah Simpson George Refuge Home for the Indigent; in late 1960s led many people in chartering the Social Services Association of Liberia.  Her brother George Arthur Padmore was an ambassador (to which country is not specified), and her mother Mary Louise was the daughter of President Arthur Barclay.  Because her parents died young, she was raised by her aunt, and George was raised by their favorite cousin, future president Edwin Barclay.  Nyttend (talk) 21:11, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Good to have provided the source and info. Now to put it in the article.Parkwells (talk) 21:11, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antoinette 

message: The final question on April 23rd (2014) was: Which country celebrates the birthday of William Tubman for leading the country for nearly three decades?  Answer: Liberia.  FYI, Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 01:00, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jeopardy (TV) question
Talk:Pomme de Terre Lake

message: I added several updates to this page today, but there's definatly more that could be there.  Short term I'd like to get this past the "stub" stage and see about creating the state park page.
In a Pomme de Terre current event note, most of Carson's Corner (254 & 64) was damaged or destroyed by a tornado this weekend.  The same tornado went through damsite park and tore up several campers and the site itself.
Harpchad 04:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

message: This lake is listed on the lake monster page, perhaps a sentence or two mentioning something about this could be added? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_monster#United_States  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.2.6.128 (talk) 21:12, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lake Monster?

message: It is an atrocitie that People are allowed to dump human and animal waste in this lake.  Shame on you. 2600:1702:4340:A50:44B3:6873:1F91:1CE4 (talk) 20:40, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pomme De Terre Lake
Talk:Southeastern Oklahoma State University

message: Other Famous Alumni include Brett Butler, the baseball player.
I reverted Thomas W deletion as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Lists_of_people  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.45.132.36 (talk) 16:27, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: And I intend to revert your revert per this quote from the link you provided:  (my emphasis). And Wikipedia's criteria for notability can be found at WP:GNG. Which, translated into real life, means that only people with an article about them here on Wikipedia should be included in the list. So if you want Chuck Easttom included in the list you'll have to wait until there's an article about him here (which could be a long wait considering that an article by that name has been deleted a number of times, first through AfD and after that through speedy deletion). Thomas.W  talk 16:38, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Alumni

message: Deleting the section Community and Location under grounds of containing "unreferenced", "weasel words", "peacock" words, and "travel guide" information. It is irrelevant to the article and the facts about the location have already been stated in the article. In-Correct (talk) 05:43, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Furthermore I am challenging section "Expansion". It needs to be completely rewritten or deleted. In-Correct (talk) 05:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleting the section "Community and Location"

message: This section contains no information about expansion. It contains no sources. All the paragraph contains is advertising. In-Correct (talk) 22:56, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleting Section "Expansion"

message: This article meets the requirements for Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 15:58, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article reclassification

message: The article has a Refimprove Section but there aren't any "citation needed". Has the information been removed already? If it has, why is there a Refimprove? I don't know which information needs the additional citations without blanking the entire section. Please help add citation needed. In Correct (talk) 22:51, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I Am Going To Look For Sources. If I Can't Find Any, I Will Delete The Information. 

message: I moved the information about Dr. Tudor and the following civil suit to its own section, as well as the information about the 2013 NAACP protests to its own section. While they are both historical events that happened at/around the university, they stand about and should have their own section outside of the history section. Thanks!
Wonderwoman97 (talk) 16:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm very puzzled why you've begun an edit war to move this material.  These incidents are part of the institution's history, not separate from them, so I'm very puzzled as to why they merit their own dedicated sections.  It may also be helpful to review our advice for the layout of college and university articles. ElKevbo (talk) 16:49, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Gender Discrimination and NAACP Protests
Talk:Dyskolos

message: I have removed this claim:
: This play was adapted by Moliere as "The Misanthrope".
The play was only republished in the 20th century from manuscripts collected at an archaeological site; Molière could not have known of it, and no mention is made of this claim at Le Misanthrope. --Saforrest 04:08, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe that "the daughter" is never even given a name. If this is so, it is noteworthy.--Wetman (talk) 04:53, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The daughter
Talk:Second Battle of Fort McAllister

message: Hazel's Men Photo...
The picture of "Hazel's men..." is incorrect. This is a picture of the Battery at Chatfield Morris Island with gun pointed at Fort Sumter (Charleston, South Carolina). It was misidentified in 2007 by Milhollen and Mugridge as being from Fort McAllister, Georgia but has since been declared to be from Chatfield Morris Island after analysis by the Director of the Army Heritage Museum and Andy House. This is in the description information for the source linked to in the photo itself: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/cwp2003000890/PP/
: Good catch.  This is obviously not one of the pieces in Fort McAllister.  Contemporary mages of the banded 32-pdr rifle at McAllister reveal had a wooden carriage, different cascabel knob assembly, had muzzle swell and muzzle chase ring.  Nor does the terrain look like McAllister for which there were contemporary images (and key aspects are still noticeable today at McAllister.)  I'll remove the image from this page. Red Harvest (talk) 09:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of North Borneo

message: As some slightly belated comments in response to a request from AR:
*The background section should go into the goals for this operation in some detail - the Battle of Labuan article covers this. A key issue is the strategic value of the operation, given that a key goal was to capture a base for the British Pacific Fleet which the British definitely did not want to ever use (as doing so would have sidelined the BPF from the main campaign against Japan).
*The nature of the Japanese occupation should also be noted: a benefit of this campaign is that it liberated civilians from harsh treatment. 
*I'd suggest an 'opposing forces' type section. The shambolic state of the Japanese forces is important to emphasise, as it explains why the campaign was so one-sided. The 9th Division was also one of the best Allied units anywhere. 
*The pre-invasion air campaign isn't noted at present
*The 'battle' section would benefit from being split into sub-sections. The coverage of the campaign in Brunei and to the south of the town could be expanded a bit.
*More detail on the Japanese side of the campaign would be helpful - e.g., that their main priority was to withdraw (which also helps to explain why there wasn't much fighting - the only battles were at Labuan where the garrison couldn't escape despite being authorised to do so and at Beaufort where the Japanese were trying to protect a key line of retreat. 
*The guerrilla campaign could be covered in more detail, as it was pretty big.
*The civil affairs effort could be covered in more detail - for instance, noting the role and failings of the British civilian administration which was basically elbowed aside by the 9th Division
*"Such was the relationship formed between the 9th Division and the civilian population of North Borneo, that the division's Unit Colour Patch was incorporated into the coat of arms of the Colony of British Borneo following the war, remaining as such until 1963" - I'm a bit sceptical of this, given that the coat of arms was that of the colonial government which the locals had no say over. Allied forces caused widespread destruction as part of this campaign, though they seem to have been welcomed by most of the locals. It would be interesting to reflect on how modern Malaysians regard the operation, as there seem to be quite a few local non-Australian funded memorials. Nick-D (talk) 10:02, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments
Talk:Operation Excess

message: The presence of RAN ships, namely HMAS Sydney suggests that a UK flag only as participant may be inappropriate. I will edit the article accordingly unless there are compelling reasons not to do so.Damwiki1 (talk) 20:34, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it work to just add Australia since that country was specifically involved?--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk  22:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, that works.Damwiki1 (talk) 07:52, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  British Empire versus UK only 

message: Tidied citations and replaced online sources with printed ones. Keith-264 (talk) 11:35, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE
Talk:Battle of Sauchieburn

message: Claims about the exact numbers on either side must be treated with caution.  However, given that the rebels seem to have had a fairly easy victory, and the rebellion had the support of the majority of the political community, I am sceptical about claims that they were outnumbered.  I suspect that, like other claims about the battle, this could be embellishment by later chroniclers. PatGallacher 22:42, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, also there is no mention of Bell-the-Cat Earl of Angus, Earl of Argyll etc the principal rebel leaders, but only relatively minor nobility such as Home, Hepburn of Hailes and Gray.Brendandh 15:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Do we have a source on the strength of the forces involved?  A total of 48k seems very high for Scotland.  Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 01:21, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strength? 
Talk:Operation Hannibal

message: There’s just a passing reference here to the three worst marine disasters in history, so I’ve added some detail. Xyl 54 (talk) 17:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Three ships

message: This article tends to downplay the military nature of the operation. There were significant amounts of troops in the Baltic "fortresses" who could be redeployed into the defence of Germany proper. Secondly, evacuating civilians made it easier to keep the troops supplied as they held onto these positions in seige conditions.  Naturally after the war Donitz would portray the operation as humanitarian, but the fact that (as noted) he was prioritising troops even after Hitler's death indicates his real concern.--Jack Upland (talk) 04:12, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military Operation 

message: Were the SS and police refugees or soldiers? Eric Koch ? Other Nazi Bonzen - uniformed and armed?Xx234 (talk) 08:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  between 800,000 and 900,000 refugees and 350,000 soldiers
Talk:Static & Silence

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 18:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Battle of Groningen

message: I'm confused.  The "forces involved" section only mentions 2nd Canadian Infantry Division, yet the "strength" section lists 9 brigades.   Canadian divisions (both infantry and armoured) were composed of 3 brigades (each in turn comprised of 3 battalions).  Could one or the other please be clarified?  Based on my maps of the Holland Campaign, my guess would be that this should likely be changed to "9 battalions", as no other Canadian division was near the 2nd at this point (the 4th Armoured & 3rd Infantry being to the east, while the 1st Infantry & 5th Armoured were to the east). Cam (Chat) 07:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion regarding strength 
Talk:Invasion of Lingayen Gulf

message: Please consider adding the USS Ommaney Bay to this narrative. The Ommaney Bay exploded and sank after being hit by a kamikaze attack, in the Sulu Sea off Luzon, during the Lingayen Operation, 4 January 1944. 
Allegrabiaggi (talk) 19:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  USS Ommaney Bay (CVE 79) 

message: I noticed this battle if wrongly placed in the pacific theatre section on the right side of the page. Its listed under the 1941-1942 philipinness campaign instead of 1945. No idea how to correct that myself so if anyone is willing.
Lionhead (talk) 20:22, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with the page 

message: I can't help but notice that the kamikaze section in this article is about two-thirds the length of the entire kamikaze article elsewhere in Wikipedia, and this excludes the mentions and discussions of kamikaze attacks outside that section, which are numerous and lengthy. Perhaps things like "kamikaze training" and the comparisons of kamikaze success rates could be deferred to the kamikaze-specific article; as it is, the article gets the reader onto the beach at Lingayen, there to sit watching Japanese aircraft smack into US warships until the commemoration section. Where's the aftermath section, or the land casualties? (No, the Battle for Luzon casualties don't count.)
Scutigera (talk) 06:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maybe too much about kamikazes?
Talk:Putney Debates

message: Hello. I don't understand a couple of bits of text, maybe these can be clarified. (1) the troops refused to agree to the new terms -- what new terms were those? (2) the entire matter was dropped, never to be seen again -- what "entire matter" was that? Universal suffrage? If so, that was revived in the 19th century, if not earlier, was it not? Thanks to anyone who can clarify these points. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:22, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My original correction was edited on the basis that there were no sources for the debates being anywhere other than the Church. Only the first day was at Putney Church - the Army moved to Quartermaster General Thomas Ireton's residence (Henry's brother) from 29 October.  The source for this is Clarke's transcript of the debates themselves - see Firth, Clarke Papers I p.281 and 363: alternatively Woodhouse's edition p39.  See also Woolrych Soldier's and Statesmen p.224.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.226.175 (talk) 10:41, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this also lthe source for tha chagne sto names you made elsewhere in the article?  David Underdown (talk) 10:52, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Location of the Debates

message: The link in the first para refers to Thomas Grosvenor's residence, if you click through it goes to an article about a US Senator of the same name. The dates don't seem to overlap, so I think it's a mis-link. 09:19, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Thomas Grosvenor?

message: What role did he play in the putney debates 102.89.34.250 (talk) 22:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gerard win Stanley
Talk:Pre-Joycean Fellowship

message: Is it coincidental that "PJF" is also the initials of Philip José Farmer (and of Peter Jairus Frigate)? -- Rsholmes 04:25, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that's part of it; a tip of the hat towards Farmer.  There was a rumor back in the 90s that Brust was really a pseudonym for Farmer.  I don't know if the rumor was due to this, or whether the initialism was in response Da Next Pope (talk) 17:09, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

text: Okay, I've sourced that (it's issue #31) and added the info and a reference to Annotated Sandman that notes this. KingArthritis (talk) 03:08, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Praxithea

message: What's up with the disclaimer that's in a box at the bottom of this page? It seems unnecessary (if people want to know what a myth is, they can look at the entry for "myth"), and I've not seen it appear on any other mythology page. I'd like to remove it, but I'll hold off for a few days to see if anyone has any objection here. Opinions? Chaoticfluffy (talk) 16:21, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Myth disclaimer
Talk:Jerome Vered

message: The beginning of this article needs to not assume that the reader knows what Jeopardy is. Omphaloscope » talk 04:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Does Holiday Kids Week count? It's almost a totally different show. Zagalejo^^^ 23:36, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Jerome Vered

message: I just watched the rerun of Ken Basin's appearance on Millionaire and checked it at the J! Archive. It appears Jerome was Ken's Phone A Friend on the $500,000 question. Is this worth adding? --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 21:50, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Millionaire Phone A Friend
Talk:Harry Quick

message: Other articles do not open by declaring what faction a member identifies with. Harry Quick intends to retire at the next election, there is a paragraph detailing which faction he is identified with. Last year when he announced his retirement quick claimed to Stateline "I was presumed to be a member of the left faction, however I don't see my self as a member of any faction" he also claims he doesn't like factions. I don't think this article should be opened with "He is a member of the socialist left faction" Kyle sb 04:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Texaphyrin

message: Here are two sources for the name of the molecule being related to the shape:
*"...Sessler, on the other hand, designed his Texaphyrin, for which a patent is pending, in the shape of a two-dimensional Frisbee with a five-point Lone Star in the middle of it."
*"The road to texaphyrin wasn't easy. After months of fruitlessly trying to make the ... a new five-lobed porphyrin shaped like the star on the Texas flag. ..."Science journal online - registration required.Johntex\talk 04:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for name due to similarity to five pointed star
Talk:Jonathan Sessler

message: Here are two sources for the name of the molecule being related to the shape:
*"...Sessler, on the other hand, designed his Texaphyrin, for which a patent is pending, in the shape of a two-dimensional Frisbee with a five-point Lone Star in the middle of it."
*"The road to texaphyrin wasn't easy. After months of fruitlessly trying to make the ... a new five-lobed porphyrin shaped like the star on the Texas flag. ..."Science journal online - registration required.Johntex\talk 04:34, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for [[texaphyrin]] name due to similarity to five pointed star

message: His contributions to hetrocyclic chemistry is really ennumbele, must have to discus that. Rahulsoman (talk) 08:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Must have to discus