Talk:Romeo and Juliet on screen

message: Good work on this page.  One quesiton - is it for Film AND tv, or just film?Smatprt 22:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good work

message: I rated the article Stub/Mid; mostly to avoid it being Unassessed. I rated it Stub rather then Start because it's very listy and it's not List of Romeo and Juliet on screen but Romeo and Juliet on screen. Converting the lists to prose would, IMO, automatically raise it to Start class.--Xover 13:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:BARD rating

message: I was wondering if Tromeo and Juliet was really notable enough to be included in this article.  I realize there are plenty of fans of Schlock Horror, but this entry sounds pretty disgusting and I was questioning whether we want to be elevating this particular movie's status by including it in the company of Zefferelli, and the like?Smatprt (talk) 14:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tromeo...

message: To be honest, a lot of editors would say this already was a GA, but to be safe, I'll just point out a few things.
* Expand the lead section a bit more
* Fix the two citation tags.
* Lots of GA editors will object to the long list at the bottom. It may be possible to ease their fears by making it a table, or by finding some other way to make it more professional looking. Most of the list is uncited as well. Wrad (talk) 16:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm a bit concerned about the images in amount and in their meaningfullness - there are a lot of them and I'm not sure that they really assist critical commentary about the adaptations.  There are also a lot of them, which is a bit of a concern.  The applicable guide is WP:NFCC. -Malkinann (talk) 07:18, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that most all of them are perfectly fine in this article. The problem arises with non-free pictures associated with lists. Lists don't have critical commentary. Wrad (talk) 15:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be pretty relaxed about losing Saire and Seal. I think the others are justified by the content, though (although it was me who put them all up in the first place). AndyJones (talk) 15:55, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The images will need a fair use rationale. Not having one is one of the quickest ways a GA nom can meet its end. Wrad (talk) 16:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Haven't I given them a fair use rationale? How much more detail should I give? AndyJones (talk) 16:17, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh I didn't see it. Maybe put it under a new heading such as "fair use rationale". Putting it in the summary leaves it at risk of being missed. Wrad (talk) 16:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pre-GA Stuff

message: Is Valley Girl worthy of inclusion? The story is set in the San Fernando Valley with Deborah Foreman as Julie (Juliet) and Nicholas Cage as Randy (Romeo).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.253.139.27 (talk) 18:22, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Valley Girl (1983)?

message: An image used in this article, File:PaltowBalcony.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:11, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:PaltowBalcony.JPG Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: that this oppenning sentence is among the most amusing things on Wikipedia:
Cukor featured Norma Shearer and Leslie Howard, with a combined age over 75, as the teenage lovers. Zeffirelli populated his film with beautiful young people, and Baz Luhrmann produced a heavily-cut fast-paced version aimed at teenage audiences.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.143.32.78 (talk) 01:30, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  I must say 

message: I'd like to suggested adding R#J a 2021 Romeo and Juliet film to this article. The title makes it practically unsearchable, I'm not sure how else to deal with it. -- 109.76.215.67 (talk) 13:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: <nowiki>R#J</nowiki>