Talk:Champagne Krug

message: I'm changing a fair amount of information on this page, as it is misleading and shows a lack of understanding about wine and in particular the Champagne region's practices. Terroiriste 10:56, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacking accuracy 

message: Never heard about organoleptically inert oak. Why should they pay for it ? Why should they have additional work with 205 Liter casks ?? --Symposiarch 10:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  organoleptically inert oak 

message: Oaky is very close to "Okay" and thus looks like a typo. Plus, it just sounds like a stupid, made-up word. I suggest we change it. I realize that it is not, in fact, a made-up word. But it sounds childish.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.88.195.245 (talk) 21:11, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oaky? 

message: I can understand that you see mention of the stainless steel manufacturer's name as advertising. let me assure you that I do not even know anyone from Laval :) I only put it in, since they are generally recognised as one of the top sources of stainless steel fermenters and most wineries who use them point out that fact. I am of the opinion that if the information is available and unbiased, it is safer to put it in that to leave it out, but I have no opposition to you prefering to leave it off the page, although I would be interested to know if you still stand by that given my explanation. Thanks for taking the time to contribute to this page though :) Terroiriste 12:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: would you also mention the dry yeast they use, I am sure they buy it also from a renowned company ? Anyway yeast would have an influence on the product, while stainless steel shouldn't have an influence at all.--Symposiarch 13:01, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Advertising 

message: Does this article need more citations? I can't seem to see any. I'm rather new to editing Wikipedia so I'm not entirely sure, but certain parts of the article seem like generalizations. It is otherwise a very good article. I hope that the talented people who worked on it can fill in the blanks? For example, the line;  "As a wine, it is considered almost unanimously by connoisseurs of Champagne as the most prestigious house in Champagne, with the possible exception of Champagne Salon, depending on the individual taster's preferences." It seems like it needs a source. Who said it? Where was it said? What connoisseurs? Etc. It seems like weasel words to me. Again, I'm a newbie, but I'll go ahead and add a citation notation. I also think it needs some more in various places, but I'm a bit unsure where to add them. I hope some more experienced editors can work on the article? -- Dee 09:44, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What's disappointing is that claims in the article aren't even linked to specific sources.  If I were writing an advert-article for a product, I'd be sure to 'cite' some offline sources in order to give it the veneer of verifiability.  Rogerborg (talk) 09:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations Needed? 

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum caution and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform the project members on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 08:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: Hi everyone,
I post here a conversation we had with one contributor.
You can see here how we would like to work with you.
This project is open to every one. Thanks for helping us to make a great page.
Many thanks for your interest for Krug.
Champagne Krug (talk) 11:55, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaborative  project with The House of Krug 

message: Hello! I just got back from vacation and haven't got an opportunity to look at this too in-depth. But right off the bat the one section that jumps out as problematic will be the "Relationship with Krug lovers". That would be incredibly difficult to write in a neutral fashion that doesn't come across as an WP:ADVERT. Similarly, we will need to be careful with the quotes so that they don't come across as WP:TRIVIA. However, I can possible see a scenario where some of this information may fit in the Champagne in popular culture article (with reliable sources of course). I will give this a more thorough look over tomorrow but so far it looks like a good start. :) AgneCheese/Wine 18:11, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Hi everybody.
Being currently very busy on our digital project, we decided to delay our collaborative project to be sure to have time to discuss with you.
We will back soon. 
Thanks a lot for your time and your interest.
--Champagne Krug (talk) 09:29, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaborative  project with The House of Krug 

message: Hello all,
Happy to be back on Wikipedia after a few months of planning and hard work.
I still want to use the resources and collective knowledge to work together in drafting the best possible article. On my user page, you will find a message from the President & CEO of the House of Krug explaining the aim of this page, as well as the reasoning behind it.
As previously mentioned, I have been working to complete the article and verify the accuracy of the content, while respecting the Wikipedia guidelines. My overall goal is to create an excellent article.
I will also be publishing my article on the Talk page so that you can have a look at it, your comments and help us to fully satisfy our obligations to the Wikipedia community.
We hope that our transparency will offer reassurance of our commitment to respecting the principle and spirit of the Wikipedia contribution rules.
Enjoy contributing!
--Tristan.sbry (talk) 09:17, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that I changed the section headers to bold to make it clearer that the is one proposal, not several unrelated talk section topics.  I also moved the comments down to the bottom, and added a  tag to invite more users to comment.  GoingBatty (talk) 00:35, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaborative project with The House of Krug 

message: }
Hello everyone, 
As you know, I work with Krug and am currently involved in a project concerning Wikipedia.  In the last few months, Krug have updated the brand. This situation cause new changes and concern their communication on digital networks. 
I want to highlight that the photos currently displaying on Champagne Krug’ Wikipedia article don’t fit in with the new brand image of Krug. That’s why Krug want to know if it might be possible to change the photos that are included on the article. And replace them with new photos that are similar to those which appear on the article.
I would like to know if anyone can update this information because I can’t edit the article myself. 
Kind regards
Tristan.sbry (talk) 13:03, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for reaching out with this request to have an edit done on Champaigne Krug. I understand that you would like to add new images to reflect the new face of Krug and its products. It is very simple. Just upload the photos to Wikimedia commons using the form here. You would need to ensure that you own the copyright of those photos and that you are releasing the said photos under the creative commons 3.0 licence or the public domain licence.Once you do that then post the link of uploaded photos here so that I can go ahead to assist with the update. Fedelis4198 (talk) 06:03, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

text: As explained by Fedelis4198 above, you should first upload the images to Commons:.  This is a different project, essentially just a repository of images.  There are no issues with COI with uploading Commons images.  Once you have done that you can link to them here and make a new request to have them inserted in the article. SpinningSpark 11:34, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we change the photos of Champagne Krug article? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Champagne Krug. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150819070110/http://www.wine-pages.com/features/krug.htm to http://www.wine-pages.com/features/krug.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150610200744/http://www.champagneguide.com.au/img/Krug.pdf to http://www.champagneguide.com.au/img/Krug.pdf
*Added archive https://archive.is/20131108052605/http://www.krug.com/en/krug-id to http://www.krug.com/en/krug-id
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified