lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ohio University – Chillicothe

message: A full list of degrees should be display in the article. Someone redo the article and left out the list of major courses at the campus. I could add this into the article. I like others to agree before I post.
Rasseru (talk) 23:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Listing types of degrees''' 

message: Having any pictures of the campus grounds should show real photos of every day life. Have advertising type photos gives the campus a false image. Wikipedia is a place for information and facts. Submitting photos should show the campus as it is at times. So any one who wish to add a image of any kind? Please have a discussion of it here.
Any Advertising should be listed limited.
Rasseru (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Pictures of Campus and Advertising'''
Talk:Conestoga (convention)

message: For the past several weeks at least (and possibly longer, this was posted 22 October 2010), the sftulsa.org website has been effectively down; it has a circular redirect that can't complete.  Information obtained by word-of-mouth from someone on the convention committee seems discouraging; the statement was made that the convention has encountered difficulties with the Radisson Hotel where it has been hosted for several years, and the committee is reportedly trying to locate a replacement venue.  It was also stated that the 2011 instance of the convention might have to be skipped due to the difficulty involved in finding another location.  With their website down, communication with the convention staff to confirm the status of the event is difficult at best.
64.91.131.146 (talk) 18:39, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Karasumi

message: This article is not exclusively about Japanese mullet roe; two sentences are about Taiwan. It's thus inaccurate to only use the Japanese name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.43.193.93 (talk) 02:08, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Move to 'Mullet Roe'?
Talk:Braid theory

message: John Manuel-"-Todos Llegan de Noche, todos se van de día" 03:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Perhaps this article should be merged with braid group?  Best, Sam nead (talk) 01:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. − 163.1.88.6 (talk) 13:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge with Braid group

message: Is the picture with subscript: "a braid is associated to a graph" supposed to represent anything?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by HStel (talk • contribs) 18:10, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Textualism

message: This article needs a complete rewrite, and substantive new material. The issue is relevant in (at least) all countries with legal systems derived from England, and textualism or "black-letter law" has historically been more successful outside the US. JQ 11:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: US-only

message: If the following excerpt from the article on Spooner describes an attempt at textual interpretation, then I propose a link to this article from Spooner's should be made:"Spooner challenged the claim that the text of the Constitution supported slavery.[14] Although he recognized that the Founders had probably not intended to outlaw slavery when writing the Constitution, he argued that only the meaning of the text, not the private intentions of its writers, was enforceable. Spooner used a complex system of legal and natural law arguments in order to show that the clauses usually interpreted as supporting slavery did not, in fact, support it, and that several clauses of the Constitution prohibited the states from establishing slavery under the law.[14] Spooner's arguments were cited by other pro-Constitution abolitionists, such as Gerrit Smith and the Liberty Party, which adopted it as an official text in its 1848 platform. Frederick Douglass, originally a Garrisonian disunionist, later came to accept the pro-Constitution position, and cited Spooner's arguments to explain his change of mind"
:-Rich Peterson24.7.28.186 (talk) 18:23, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Lysander Spooner]] and textualism

message: . . .it may be quoted Justice Scalia . . .
This formulation may be permissible in some languages, but not in English (at least, not yet).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pamour (talk • contribs) 11:17, 5 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meaning 

message: This entry says that "Textualism is often erroneously conflated with originalism," but Originalism#Original meaning uses the Holmes quote here presented as summarizing textualism to summarize the original meaning type of originalism. I would say that they're synonymous. "Originalism" once meant "original intent," but now it nearly always means "original meaning," largely thanks to Scalia. -- Calion | Talk 02:21, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incompatible with Originalism entry
Talk:Southern Airways

message: This airline served the northwestern corner of South Carolina by the early 1950s, and so my guess is that it should read "south central and southeastern U.S." rather than simply "south central."  Even so, I was four years old in 1949 and cannot say for sure.  By the early fifties I can bear personal and reliable witness to its presence in S.C.  It flew the DC3 back in those days.Landrumkelly 03:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Emmett C. Burns Jr.

message: Why even single out the one small phrase? Because of the shock value of it? That's hardly encyclopedic in both content and reason. JayHubie (talk) 00:22, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not censored. I think in this case the "shock value" makes the phrase encyclopedic, since I believe it was widely reported on. Though perhaps the mainstream media didn't repeat the phrase quite as much as Deadspin did. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:45, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Wikipedia IS censored in the sense that it doesn't report every single detail possible about everything. If the "shock value" is truly important AND, more importantly, encyclopedic (which it isn't), then the entire letter should be posted as the entire letter was for the "shock value."  Of course, "shock value" doesn't actually make something automatically encyclopedic.  I suspect you know this. JayHubie (talk) 03:08, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are the "gory details" of Kluwe's letter really necessary? 
Talk:Johnny Olszewski (politician)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Johnny Olszewski (politician). Consensus on the politician dab. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 06:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: John A. Olszewski Jr. → ? – This page is currently named in a way that does not follow WP:COMMONNAME and WP:Middle names. Local media websites write his name as Johnny Olszewski (WBAL, Baltimore Brew, Baltimore County Government) or Johnny Olszewski Jr. (BaltSun, Maryland Matters, WTOP) I feel that the page should be moved to either Johnny Olszewski Jr. or Johnny Olszewski (politician) to fix this issue. Y2hyaXM (talk) 17:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

text: Support Johnny Olszewski (politics) per WP:COMMONNAME. 120.28.224.32 (talk) 20:34, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: "(politician)" would be the usual disambiguator. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 23 November 2023
Talk:Richard F. Colburn

message: isn't it about time the person editing from a state government IP be reported to the media, tagged as a vandal, or banned by wikipedia for repeatedly deleting the well-documented controversy section about colburn? 12.187.236.194 (talk) 16:25, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting the controversy section 

message: Easternshorebuff desires the controversy section be be completely removed as "not relevant to this page".  I have asked him to expand on his request, and that we should discuss his request here. David (talk) 18:02, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This user has deleted the section again, and I've restored, but will not restore again, as to avoid an edit war.  I believe the section should remain, but request input from others as to their opinion.  Thank you. David (talk) 19:46, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: it's good you're not edit-warring, but that section has some serious BLP issues.  The first paragraph is unsourced.  The third seems to be sourced, but I'm not sure it's a reliable source.  The fourth and fifth paragraph seem excessive, too.  That doesn't mean the other editor should just delete it without giving a reason, but you should read the BLP guidelines before adding scandalous material.  A trimmed-down, well-sourced section would be appropriate.  --Coemgenus 20:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that it could use work.  I was not the original editor who added the information, only restored what user easternshorebuff deleted.  David (talk) 20:45, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I see.  Well, I definitely agree without that complete deletion without discussion is not the answer.  --Coemgenus 21:24, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

text: I'm gonna introduce a rehashed version of the Controversies section. Hopefully it'll be a little more concise but I'm happy with the sources. I imagine it will be unilaterally reverted as 'irrelevant' fairly soon but I'll give it a shot Bob House 884 (talk) 18:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

text: Possible alternate source for the "watermelon" section:  David (talk) 14:58, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Looks like those all came from about the same period -- is there any long-term coverage?--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:08, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Does their need to be? Allegations must be 'notable, relevant, and well-documented' and this one is surely? Notable for significant coverage in local sources and the Washington Post, relevant since it directly relates to his legislative activities and resources and well-documented due to numerous RSs as have been given. The latest source indicated (18/04/05) is dated almost a month after the Baltimore Sun's article (22/03/05) - which seems like relatively long term coverage for a political 'scandal' in any case, unless political stories are only to be considered worthy of inclusion if they still make for watercooler talk 6 months down the line. Bob House 884 (talk) 15:26, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy section
Talk:Collier Cudmore

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 03:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Viktor Lutze

message: I had never heard of this guy until I recently viewed Leni Reifenstahl's "Triumph of the Will" in which he is the most prominently featured figure after Hitler, a guy (Lutze) with a very tough thugghish persona. In fact there is a whole emotionally charged scene involved his speech to the SA rally at Nuremberg in 1934 after which he is mobbed by supporters and almost carried away on their shoulders.  He is also one of three people, along with Hitler and Himmler, shown walking forward to Hindenburg's bier at the memorial rally for the ex-President and Field Marshal.  Perhaps this article should be fleshed out more.Tom Cod 03:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ''
"He maintained his position till his death in a car accident. (Rumors have persisted that he was in fact assassinated when his car was ambushed by partisans who in fact understood .....''
student  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.94.113.183 (talk) 21:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death, alternate version 

message: Thereafter, Lutze became a merchant and joined the police force. - So, he joined the "police force" (? which) as "merchant" ? How long served he at this ominous "Police Force" ? --2001:A61:2B86:9801:EC0D:3B2B:E8EC:5D67 (talk) 14:23, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  After WW-I
Talk:Papyrus Oxyrhynchus 3035

message: This translation of POxy 3035 currently shows "Christian".
Other translations have proposed "Chrestian".
This should be mentioned in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.212.140.171 (talk) 05:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian or Chrestian?
Talk:Foreign policy of the François Mitterrand administration

message: Hello! Thanks for a much-needed article, but I'm not sure the source covers up the claim. And certainly the source can't back something written later. If you want to criticize Mitterrand's policy by saying it was lacking coordination (it might very well be the case), please find more than one source - you can accuse him of a lot, but I'm not sure "lacking coordination" is what best characterized him... Again, it's a very nice article, but such a subject needs close attention. Should we rename it to Foreign policy of France (1981-1995)? The guy didn't do all by himself... Tazmaniacs 03:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Alright, you are right. I based the title of the article on the title used at Foreign policy of Hugo Chavez. I can see the argument in favor of moving it to Foreign policy of France (1981-1995) based on the way the History of X country articles are often separated and titled, but if we do it by years perhaps it would be better separated by decades? Perhaps this should be brought to the attention of the foreign policy wikiproject for discussion. Perspicacite 04:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It would surely be the best way to bring it to Foreign Policy Wikiproject (of which I was not aware of). A decade in itself doesn't really have sense, I think the best is either to base ourselves on presidential terms (in this case, 81-88, 88-95) or, for France at least, one could do it by regimes (Foreign policy of France (Fifth Republic), Foreign relations of Vichy France, Foreign relations of France (Third Republic), etc. (PS: note the existence of Foreign relations of Venezuela) Tazmaniacs 14:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: this article claims FM was pro reunification
 yet wiki's Francois Mitterand claim quote:
 "He was opposed to German Reunification, even thinking of a military alliance with Russia to stop it, “camouflaged as a joint use of armies to fight natural disasters”.http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6829735.ece He made a controversial visit to East Germany after the fall of Berlin Wall." 
???08:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  German reunification??? 
Talk:Scientific fundamentalism

message: I propose we keep this article but put the following text:
Scientific Fundamentalism is a myth based on ignorance of the scientific method and the nature of scientific debate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zen Metheus (talk • contribs) 
:I'd say that's too POV toward the other end of the spectrum... but at any rate, until AfD closes, you should comment here, not on this page. Groupthink 04:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

message: I've edited the article to make it less PoV. No doubt some will say that it is now PoV in the other direction. Rjm at sleepers 05:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: By mistake, I described a recent set of edits as minor when they were not - my apologies. Rjm at sleepers 08:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I'd say that's a good job... IFF it can be backed by citations. Groupthink 13:56, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PoV 

message: If no one objects, at this time tomorrow I will redirect this page to scientism. Groupthink 00:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal 

message: As the originator of the "scientific fundamentalism" page, I am unable to work more on it for now, so accept merging into scientism. However, those dismissing this term should read the eminent philosopher Mary Midgley - in particular her "Science as Salvation - a modern myth and its meaning" (http://www.amazon.co.uk/Science-Salvation-Modern-Myth-Meaning/dp/0415107733/ref=sr_1_1/202-2746987-6635853?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1187429748&sr=8-1). Mary is no creationist. Wakeford 09:39, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Originators response
Talk:Hot and sour soup

message: Although North American hot and sour soup contains vegetables rather than meats, the broth isn't usually vegetarian. It's sometimes made from a pre-made broth powder, which probaby isn't vegetarian either. Traditionally, pork blood is used in the recipe and the broth is likely to not be vegetarian in many recipes. Badagnani 05:40, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vegetarian?

message: Usually served with fried wonton noodles/strips. F. L.  (talk) 17:47, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accompaniments
Talk:Leptospermum laevigatum

message: The photo of the Leptospermum with the pink flowers is NOT of a Leptospermum laevigatum. It is a photo of a Leptospermum scoparium. The second photo titled "foliage" is of a Leptospermum laevigatum. 
Dammett (talk) 04:02, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, :Image:Leptospermum laevigatum1.jpg removed --Melburnian (talk) 14:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect photo 
Talk:X-Men: First Class (comics)

message: Is the series considered part of continuity?--RedKnight (talk) 15:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fiercely agreed (on the article being *very* vague and confusing)... not just on this matter, but in general.  I hadn't heard of this series when it first came out and just found out about it today.  I came across this article through a link from the wiki page for X-Men: The Hidden Years, and that article implied a similar theme to this one (i.e. that it took place during the chronological period between UXM #66 and Giant-Sized X-Men #1, but that it took place in Marvel-616).  But if that's the case, you wouldn't know it from reading this particular article. Homoaffectional (talk) 17:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Some of this information should be included in the article somehow. -- Beardo (talk) 15:10, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity 

message: Added the Finals tpb to the collected editions table. Mutant Raccoon (talk) 00:56, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Collected Editions: Finals tpb

message: See discussion here.  postdlf (talk) 17:33, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion: should this be moved to [[X-Men: First Class (comics)]]?
Talk:Local ecumenical partnership

message: Is this article limited to England and Wales? Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 04:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: England and Wales

message: Possible categorization of joint worshop from the North American experience and from an Episcopalian/Anglican perspective.
#Anglican church rents space to another church. I know of an Anglican church and Roman Catholic church sharing a building for 17 years with the Anglicans being the landlord.
#Anglican church is  part of an ecumenical centre. I know of two types. In one type, the centre is much like a shopping plazza where the various churches share one physical building but maintain separate spaces and, possibly, separate entrances. In newly constructed communities this seems to be the case. The other type of ecumenical centre consists of a common hall or space which is occupied on a schedule by various churches much like basketball, badminton and volleyball players will share a community gym. This seems to be the model for university and hospital worship spaces. For example, the the first ecumenical church to be built in Canada in 1968 in Whistler, British Columbia .
#Anglican church shares a church building and worship space with another church on a fortnightly rotation. One Sunday, the service is Anglican. Next Sunday, the service is of the other church. The congregation can be almost identical on each Sunday so that it is the leaders and style that change. This usually occurs in small and remote communities but I know of a city example. For example, St Mark's Anglican Church/Trinity United Church in Vancouver .
#Anglican church is home to a minister or priest of a different church who will lead the occasional service. I know of an example where a Lutheran street priest is based out of an Anglican church.
#Anglican and another church hold joint services every Sunday lead by a leader from both churches to a mixed congregation.
For example, the Church of the Holy Apostles in Virginia Beach, Virginia: a Anglican/Roman Catholic Church in the Episcopal Diocese of Southern Virginia.
There might be other joint worship/ecumenical models. My categorization is only to generate some ideas of how to incorporate the concept into the main article. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast 05:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Joint Worship
Talk:Lamps Plus

message: I've added some external references to patents held by Lamps Plus, Dennis Swanson or it's subsidiaries. I've also added sources for awards and recognitions.
Kwyjibo99 04:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early stub 

message: Made a number of changes as the page looked over 10 years old since the last update. Callmestarbucks (talk) 18:56, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Supreme Court case added. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:39, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 revisions
Talk:Doug Ardito

message: Doug has been in a number of Los Angeles and Boston based bands. Some of these include:
Puddle Of Mudd (Current)
Cellophane (Late 90's Produced by Ross Robinson & Howard Benson)
UV (Mid 90's with Guitarist Rob Patterson and Drummer Mark "Moke" Bistany)
Throat Culture (Early 90's in Boston)
He is an artist endorsed by Fender Guitars & Ampeg Amps  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.63.234 (talk) 18:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doug Ardito
Talk:The Vipers Skiffle Group

message: The Vipers' "Don't You Rock Me Daddy-O" is a slight variant of the folk standard "Sail Away Ladies", as recorded by Uncle Dave Macon in the later 1920s. --scruss 11:20, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Originality?
Talk:Mike Marrone

message: Is this on the same person as Michael Marrone (boxer)? If so, it should be tagged for a merge. Boleyn3 (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Same person?
Talk:Species (metaphysics)

message: Because of the taxonomic definitions of genus and species I prefer to replace "For example, a human being as a species can be defined as an animal (genus) that can reason (differentia)." with somethin that is not a bilogical species (so there is no possible confusion that in this case genus is Homo and species is sapiens).  Perhaps: for example, a tricycle is a huiman powered vehicle (genus) with three wheels (species)." though I think something still better can be found.  RJFJR (talk) 16:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Walk of Life (Billie Piper song)

message: Does it have any connection at all to the Dire Straits song? -Ashley Pomeroy 19:35, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Look at them yo-yos 

message: This page says that it is about Billie's song, Walk of Life, but it has got info about the single. Either we should split the article (which I wouldn't recommend because it's a stub), or we should change the page so that it is clear that it is about both the single and the song. 203.192.85.33 (talk) 12:37, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Single or Song?
Talk:Dwarf pygmy goby

message: Dragonbite 04:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

message: sorry, the smallest fish in the world is Paedocypris progenetica, see http://news.mongabay.com/2006/0126-smallest_fish.html --Melly42 23:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But it is also extinct GrahamBould 08:18, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: smallest fish of the world?

message: Shouldn't this be "gram" rather than "milligram"? -- 85.179.171.232 10:30, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Average weight is from 4 to 5 mg" 