lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:101st SS Heavy Panzer Battalion

message: The article should be renamed "Schwere SS-Panzer-Abteilung 101" or "Schwere SS-Panzerabteilung 101". If the name is to be in English, it should be "101st SS-Heavy Tank Battalion".
LV 16:01, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree to the title change to SS Heavy Panzer Battalion 101 --Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:36, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see link:- 
https://www.facebook.com/simon.hill.334/media_set?set=a.10200672987250567.1073741842.1337407275&type=3
It's my Face Book photo Album of the 1/6th Scale Tiger 1 serial '007' of Michael Wittmann's....
Yours Sincerely,
Simon Hill
Bangkok  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.108.215.225 (talk) 13:44, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiger 1 model in 1:6 scale
Talk:Åsane Fotball

message: I propose that the recently created article Åsane Fotball Damer be merged into Åsane Fotball. I don't think it can be justified to have two stand-alone articles for two clubs that play at such a low level, even if the men's team and the women's team might not be the same club "formally". The women's team doesn't pass the general notability guideline, and playing at the second tier of women's football in Norway confers no notability, so the best thing would be to merge the articles about the women's team into the parent article. Mentoz86 (talk) 14:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related discussions. Mentoz86 (talk) 14:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

text: I don't really mind a merger, as long as the information from Åsane Fotball Damer is included in the new article. However, if the articles are merged, I think they should be merged to Åsane Allianseidrettslag, which is the name of the club which encompasses both the men's and ladies' football teams, a handball team, an American football team etc, like the Norwegian bokmål wikipedia has here.--Barend (talk) 19:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe Åsane Fotball should exist as an own article, but could created the article about Åsane AIL and mention the women's football team, the handball team and the american football team, with Åsane Fotball Damer (and maybe the other team's names) being redirected to that article. Mentoz86 (talk) 09:44, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I wholeheartedly disagree on the split proposal. This would be two very short stubs, and it's the same club, really. Geschichte (talk) 10:48, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: For lazy people it`s too short articles, but if both articles to do full, not short, in that case we will have two normal articles. Makenzis (talk) 11:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split proposal
Talk:Ohio State Route 2C

message: Taken from SLD's, some info assumed from usage of the interchange.Einstine85 16:23, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not too familiar with US roads but a state route is fairly notable, right? If this is just a short stretch at an interchange then perhaps a merge with Ohio State Route 2 would be better. Also, it really does need expanding. If you must, put it up for an articles for deletion discussion, but it's not speediable. --Robdurbar 17:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies. I was unaware of the wikiproject in question. I suppose questions relating to the notability of the roads and the usefulness of the project should be held there. yandman 08:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While true that this state route does exist, the question is: to what extent?  Is it signed as State Route 2C?  I have only been on SR 2 between Toledo and Cleveland once, and that was just about 10 years ago.  I'm guessing from 2C's length of 0.64 miles that it is probably not separately signed, but that ODOT simply called it 2C because it's a "connector."  There are probably hundreds of little connector routes listed on the SLD pages – most designate one-way directional routes – that are not deserving of their own separate pages here.  I also don't feel that it even requires mention on the SR 2 page, since it's just a connector.  I will propose a clarification on the WP:OHSH page requiring routes to be signed or historical to be deseving of their own articles — Homefryes Say•Do 11:45, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

message: State Route 2C should be merged with Ohio State Route 2.  None of the 'special' routes have their own pages, but rather have sections on the main page explaining the route. Milktaco 19:39, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Strindheim IL

message: I believe football is not really the most prominent sport in Strindheim IL as this article states. The football team is at the third level (2. divisjon) in the Norwegian league. The cross contry skiers are far more impressing with Petter Northug and several other world cup athletes.-- Larspedia 21:36, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Football vs other sports. 
Talk:Ursa Major South group of galaxies

message: After studying the reference material available for the Ursa Major South group of galaxies, I have come to the conclusion that it is part of the M109 Group (with the final page being named "M109 Group"). 
Currently, the Wikipedia article relies on material from the "Atlas of the Universe" page, which is not peer-reviewed.  I checked Hyperleda, the reference within the Atlas of the Universe page, and I found that the reference gives results that are different from the Altas of the Universe page.  This means that the Atlas of the Universe is a bogus reference on this topic.
I then checked the article by Fouque et al. (1992) which uses the term.  Fouque et al. may be the only refereed paper that uses the term "Ursa Major I South" for the group.  Apparently, many of the galaxies in the Fouque et al. "Ursa Major I South" group correspond to galaxies listed by the Nearby Galaxy Catalog and by Giuricin et al. (2000) as part of the same group as M109 (NGC 3992).  The Giuricin et al. results are particularly robust; they used three different algorithms for group detection and derived similar results from all three for the M109 Group.  I therefore think that Fouque et al. are probably in error and that the thing currently listed as the Ursa Major South group of galaxies should be merged with the M109 Group.
Before I undertake such a merge, what do other people think?  Please respond by 17 Nov, at which time I will undertake the merge.  George JBendo 16:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I received no comments on this in three different forums.  I am moving ahead with redirecting Ursa Major South group of galaxies to M109 Group.  Note that the LGG Catalogue specifically identifies UMa I N and UMa I S as belonging to one group and that the results from the LGG Catalogue are representative of the other group catalogs.  The merge is therefore justified.  GeorgeJBendo 10:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible merge with [[M109 Group]]
Talk:M109 Group

message: After studying the reference material available for the Ursa Major South group of galaxies, I have come to the conclusion that it is part of the M109 Group (with the final page being named "M109 Group"). 
Currently, the Wikipedia article relies on material from the "Atlas of the Universe" page, which is not peer-reviewed.  I checked Hyperleda, the reference within the Atlas of the Universe page, and I found that the reference gives results that are different from the Altas of the Universe page.  This means that the Atlas of the Universe is a bogus reference on this topic.
I then checked the article by Fouque et al. (1992) which uses the term.  Fouque et al. may be the only refereed paper that uses the term "Ursa Major I South" for the group.  Apparently, many of the galaxies in the Fouque et al. "Ursa Major I South" group correspond to galaxies listed by the Nearby Galaxy Catalog and by Giuricin et al. (2000) as part of the same group as M109 (NGC 3992).  The Giuricin et al. results are particularly robust; they used three different algorithms for group detection and derived similar results from all three for the M109 Group.  I therefore think that Fouque et al. are probably in error and that the thing currently listed as the Ursa Major South group of galaxies should be merged with the M109 Group.
Before I undertake such a merge, what do other people think?  Please respond by 17 Nov, at which time I will undertake the merge. GeorgeJBendo 16:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I received no comments on this in three different forums.  I am moving ahead with redirecting Ursa Major South group of galaxies to M109 Group.  Note that the LGG Catalogue specifically identifies UMa I N and UMa I S as belonging to one group and that the results from the LGG Catalogue are representative of the other group catalogs.  The merge is therefore justified.  GeorgeJBendo 10:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible merge with [[Ursa Major South group of galaxies]]
Talk:UCA Division I-A College National Championship

message: Does anyone know when the last time Miami University made finals for UCA College Nationals or could someone point me in the direction of where I could possibly find this info? Thank you! 2603:6010:5100:8114:3D50:4FB5:1C35:5A4E (talk) 16:31, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miami University (Oxford, OH) UCA College Nationals
Talk:Valve seat

message: I have removed the following link from this article:
*www.coherix.com/auto/surfacedetective/Technical%20Foundations%20and%20Heritage/Shapix%20Surface%20Detective%20Carl%20Aleksoff%20%20SPIE%20Paper.pdf
It is intentionally unlinked as I believe the inserter is intending to promote his/her product. The contents of the PDF lead into a promotion of a product. I am listing it here for others to review, however, because it does contain other information that might be useful. I leave it to others to determine whether it should be included. --AbsolutDan (talk) 16:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  promo link? 

message: Valves occurring in any pipework or pipeline have seats as well, yet the article only talks about engines!--86.12.160.194 (talk) 14:01, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broaden scope
Talk:Ouzoud Falls

message: The next-to-last sentence in this article is very odd and makes no sense in English. Anyone have any theories on what it is supposed to mean? --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 16:39, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Muy odd sentence

message: dh9iahpu-j
qje9gqap
ajd[s]a
oerjhghp[a]
s]egfg.
iqwtojkkw9gweuduuuuuuuuuuuuuoehfoy0hnw;s]psx  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.100.180.75 (talk) 20:42, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  jxhdghjgfgigfodu9hxckbihl\nziyiab; 

message: Not Abid. Abeed means Slave according to google translate. TheThomas (talk) 18:30, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  El Abid River Means slave. 

message: The site of Ouzoud is wrongly attributed to Middle Atlas in the article whereas it is clearly located in High Atlas.
37.248.154.47 (talk) 10:29, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong positioning
Talk:Coleraine F.C.

message: This article has come to the attention of an editor intent on imposing a personal view that the term "Northern Irish" is unacceptable. Under WP:BRD, editors are expected to come to the Talk page if they have been reverted. To continue to edit in these circumstances can be considered as disruptive.
The text should be restored so as to remain consistent with other similar articles. There is no consensus that references to "Northern Irish" as a demonym for football clubs should be removed from the encyclopaedia. Mooretwin (talk) 12:18, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Politically-motivated edit
Talk:Millie's Cookies

message: There are 4 outlets in Scotland according to the store locator. I visited the Aberdeen one today and got a tasty cookie slice. 46.208.60.3 (talk) 15:45, 9 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scotland
Talk:Dungannon Swifts F.C.

message: The first team squad is both out of date and many of the players link to the wrong person or disambiguation pages. Either it is updated or it will be removed. Also the use of a flag to represent a player should only be used for players that have actual played for a national team as per the MOS. Bjmullan (talk) 22:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. If anyone wants to add a first team squad make sure it's up to date. This is an encyclopaedia after all. Bjmullan (talk) 23:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  First team squad 
Talk:Baalzebul (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: I looked at this artical and I was wondering where it said that Baalzebul would eventually return to his original form.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by JiffyWiffyTiffyIffy (talk • contribs) 20:07, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Baalzebul's Form'''
Talk:Belial (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: Is this 'Satan' on par with Zargon or a pre-Zargon Lord of the 9th, a Guide To Hell Ahriman-Asmodeus type manifestation or another figure completely? Did Dragon magazine ever mention "Satan" in connection with The Nine Hells at any other or further point in the canon? This is quite interesting. 4.242.174.243 (talk) 15:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apocrypha: "Satan"?
Talk:Mammon (Dungeons & Dragons)

message: I confess that I'm pretty put out by this edit. Do you seriously believe that this article should be retained? Or perhaps you believe it should be merged elsewhere? If not, what precisely is gained by reverting me? I'm trying to find solutions (preferably that avoid AfD, which can lead to bad feeling) to the huge swathe of articles about fictional elements in the D&D universe that are generally well-put-together but cover subjects which lack any real-world notability. This article is just one of many. Josh Milburn (talk) 13:05, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The main person responsible for the AFDs thinks he can be Wikipedia's one-man cleanup crew, and is not at all concerned about the bad feelings caused by his efforts. You might be able to limit which AFDs he starts by merging things before he gets to them, but that will only divert him onto looking for new things to delete. What he probably fails to realize is that given the tens (if not hundreds) of thousands of similarly GNG-failing articles on fictional topics, he could easily spend the rest of his life on this and never get anywhere near all of them. But that's his problem, not mine. 73.168.15.161 (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: There are problems with these articles. AfD is one possible route to solving them, and it may work. Merging is another. Part of the reason AfD seems to popular is that it actually has results; on the other hand, I can try and merge something and be reverted with a vague request to seek "consensus", as here. This will probably now end up going to AfD, unless someone is willing to do some legwork. People on both "sides" here (the very fact I have to talk about "sides" is indicative of a problem) can be responsible for creating bad feeling and being unwilling to find solutions that work for everyone. Josh Milburn (talk) 18:37, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:FK Pelister

message: PEDERIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.28.161.91 (talk) 10:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headline text 
Talk:FK Rabotnički

message: Hi - could you tell us the English translation for Rabotnički? What does it mean? Does it mean 'railway club'? Would be an interesting fact to put in the article. Thanks!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.211.85 (talk) 22:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It means workers' (club).--MacedonianBoy (talk) 19:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the meaning of Rabotnički?
Talk:FK Vardar

message: Please stop disruptive editing. Do not continue to remove sourced portions of page content, or other materials from Wikipedia, changing reliable terms and so on without any explanation. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 20:52, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Unexplained, nonconstructive edits
Talk:Turetsky Choir Art Group

message: Hi, I have placed a couple tags onto the article I will explain them.
The first one refers to the fact that we need third party references to confirm each fact. You can read WP:V for more information.
Also, an article's subject must demonstrate notability to be included in the encyclopedia. Our guidelines for the notability of bands are here WP:BAND.
Since this article is of biographical nature it is held to higher standards. Unless reliable sources are provided this article may be deleted. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 17:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Excellent, now we need that in the form of links to reliable third party sources. As an encyclopedia we only publish previously published information. Surely such a succesful group will have been mentioned in various media outlets? HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 17:18, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Added new references (one is in Russian). In a few days I'll add more information and references.
Aklyuch 18:48, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good show. Keep up that good work and thanks for contributing. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 19:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/SteveBaker

message: User:SteveBaker
Category talk:	6
Category:	6
Image talk:	3
Image:	38
Mainspace	1755
Portal talk:	14
Portal:	2
Talk:	630
Template talk:	26
Template:	32
User talk:	213
User:	27
Wikipedia talk:	235
Wikipedia:	183
avg edits per article	4.14
earliest	20:07, 28 April 2005
number of unique articles	766
total	3170
SteveBaker's editcount summary stats as of 17:45, November 13th 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 17:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

message: With ais523's edit counter. --ais523 17:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Random diffs from last 2000 edits
Talk:The Trouble with Tracy

message: I just removed an item at List of lost television broadcasts that says Trouble with Tracy is a lost series. This is bogus because I know it was replayed on Canadian TV within the last 10 or so years. But if such a rumor exists, and can be sourced, it might be worth noting. 70.72.211.35 (talk) 15:05, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rumors of being lost?
Talk:Montezuma's Daughter

message: :Thomas Wingfield was half-Spanish.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.142.175.22 (talk) 12:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: His mother was Luisa de García, a lady from Seville.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.142.175.22 (talk) 12:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Claudine at School

message: I updated this article with the WP:NV template, filled out some of the most important of the categories (plot summary, major themes,literary reception, adaptations), and completed the infobox (with 1st edition title page).  I therefore thought it needed to be brought up to Start class. Portia1780 (talk) 04:17, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Start class
Talk:The Marrow of Tradition

message: Note that Chesnutt's The Marrow of Tradition (published in 1901) cannot be a historical "direct refutation" of either D.W. Griffith's film, The Birth of a Nation (released in 1915), or Dixon's book, The Clansman (published in 1905), upon which Griffith's film was based.
Profrawilson 20:46, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth of a Nation 

message: This section would benefit from page references. 99.237.143.219 (talk) 02:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allusions/references to history
Talk:Andrey Kurbsky

message: Kurbsky was not a "feudal lord", because there was no feudalism in Russia. These edits are intended to blacken his name. I don't think there was something extraordinary in his attitude towards serfs, whatever Ivan's propaganda has to say to the contrary. If you insist on adding this to the article, I will start listing the gruesome crimes ascribed by Kurbsky to Ivan in the article about the latter. Do you really want this, Bel-Velvel? --Ghirla -трёп- 17:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: one link for Prince Kurbski. Same person?--Estopedist1 (talk) 07:49, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prince Kurbski
Talk:Acholi language/Archive 1

message: Acholi language and Acholi people should be merged. Linguists persist on making the difference, but Acholi people identify with their language - as many people do. Separating the people and their language (in this case) will only give two poor articles.
:I disagree on principle, not because I'm a linguist, but because Wikipedia is not paper. The indisputable fact that people identify with their language doesn't render their language a non-encyclopedic subject in itself. However, as long as we don't have a very detailed article about either of the two, it might be a good idea to merge them. — mark ✎ 00:21, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not begrudge Acholi language its rightful place on Wikipedia. My concern is that the article mat stay on stub status. As you have pointed out, we would achieve more by focussing on one article.--Ezeu 08:48, 24 August 2005 (UTC)

text: OK. I don't think this is a very good moment to merge the two, Acholi language being the African COTW and all. — mark ✎ 08:24, 24 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Acholi and Acholi language
Talk:The Tailor of Gloucester

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.com.vn/books?redir_esc=y&hl=vi&id=iRFSDwAAQBAJ&q=Gloucester+sends+his+cat+Simpkin+to+buy+food+and+a+twist+of+cherry-coloured+silk+to+complete#v=snippet&q=Gloucester%20sends%20his%20cat%20Simpkin%20to%20buy%20food%20and%20a%20twist%20of%20cherry-coloured%20silk%20to%20complete&f=false. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 12:24, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lieut. Gullivar Jones: His Vacation

message: I have rated this article as Start class because it has material appropriate to that designation in the supporting graphics; I have rated it as mid-range in importance because while its influence in the subgene of sword and planet is considerable because of its possible use by Edgar Rice Burroughs as a partila model for A Princess of Mars, it is otherwise little more than a curiosity, virtually unknown outside devotees of classic science fiction. BPK 19:35, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Explanation of ratings

message: There is an audiobook version of this book at Librivox: http://librivox.org/gulliver-of-mars-by-edwin-l-arnold
I can't add it myself because I'm associated with LV...
98.165.117.73 (talk) 23:46, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Audio Version

message: :
What does "official" mean here?  That it was authorized by Arnold's heirs?  That it was arranged by the Office of Comic Book Adaptations? —Tamfang (talk) 20:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  official 