lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:G-man

message: This article was recommended for deletion February 1, 2006.  The consensus was that the article should remain with a proper name:  G-man_(slang) rather than G-Men(Slang), per the naming conventions.  A record of the discussion can be reviewed here.  Tomertalk 06:21, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To be precise, that AfD was about , and the term "proper name" was never used in the discussion. —BarrelProof (talk) 12:29, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:AFD|AfD]] notice

message: I know nothing about HalfLife, and so I don't know for sure whether or not the "[Response to "QUOTE: Unless they are that detailed..."] Yes, they are." thing is some inappropriate comment on something written earlier in the article or something that refers to an actual part of the game.  Tomertalk 06:07, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the link to the Half-Life character; it properly belongs on the G-Man dab page, in my opinion. --Muchness 15:01, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: cleanup/Inappropriate content?

message: The New York Giants of the NFL are also sometimes referred to as "The G-Men".  Is it possible this might also get a mention here?  Admittedly it's not their main unofficial nickname, but it is used.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.51.184.11 (talk) 16:51, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: How about a cited source for that? —BarrelProof (talk) 12:29, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New York Giants? 

message: A character in the play You Can't Take It with You refers to G-Men as J-Men, as in Department of Justice (the line is on page 61 of the script for those who have access to one). Does anyone know if this was a common term in the 1930s, or was this just supposed to be a quirk of the character? Incidentally, "J-Man" on WP redirects to Joker (comics). Mapsax (talk) 13:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: In Hollywood movies, I think it's always "G-man" / "G-men", never "J-men". —BarrelProof (talk) 12:29, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  J-Man?
Talk:Ponnani

message: Please correct the typo:
"was the priciple trade route"
to
"was the principle trade route" Neconnaitpoint (talk) 11:59, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 12:28, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Note: I've changed it to "principal" (OED: principle, principal) — LauritzT (talk) 12:39, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 19 September 2021
Talk:Chaenomeles

message: The Japanese page for "karin":
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%82%AB%E3%83%AA%E3%83%B3
says Chaenomeles sinensis, which is not mentioned on the English page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaenomeles
Another dictionary gives me "Chinese Quince" as the translation of "karin", but that is Pseudocydonia sinensis:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudocydonia
What is correct/incorrect here?
:Chaenomeles sinensis has been reclassified as Pseudocydonia sinensis, so the Japanese page needs updating. SiGarb | Talk 18:22, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Chaenomeles sinensis has been added based on the folloiwng info...
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=lang_en&newwindow=1&q=chaenomeles+sinensis+%28Touin%29+Koehne+gov.cn&btnG=Search&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
--222.64.21.218 (talk) 03:25, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A topic of....
Talk:Enjoi

message: The "article" is very subjective, eg "high quality", and is therefore biased. Haizum 06:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is a very late response, but the tone issue that you have identified has well-and-truly been resolved and the article continues to be improved. The primary issue at this stage is an expansion of the article, especially in light of Enjoi's current status in the global skateboarding community.--Soulparadox (talk) 03:57, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: There is no citation for the official Enjoi riders.  As a result, the actual riders cannot be verified and differentiated from editors that add themselves or their friends.  I am removing the section until the list can be verified from a reliable source. Alanraywiki (talk) 17:36, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: This situation has now been resolved, but I also need to add a comment about the recent inclusion of Aaron "Jaws" Homoki—he was on Enjoi several years ago, but has been a team rider for Birdhouse, with the latter company promoting him to professional status in 2011: Aaron Jaws Homoki Turns Pro For Birdhouse Skateboards.--Soulparadox (talk) 03:55, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  We should either remove Cairo Foster from the list of Pro riders, and move him to flow, or label him as retired, since he retired last year.: . The Enjoi website has him listed under Enjoi Division. . --Charvettroy (talk) 00:37, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of riders 

message: Enjoi is owned by Globe, an Australian company, and the manufacturing factory is in China (DSM). Is this a US or Australian manufacturer? I have changed it to the latter for the moment.--Soulparadox (talk) 09:20, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  US or Australian manufacturer?  

message: Hey everyone, I was thinking about updating the 2014-Present section by including Enjoi's recent video series on Thrashermagazine.com and Youtube titled, "Panda Patrol." It seems like some of their most recent work. . Let me know if you think this is worth adding to the article. --Charvettroy (talk) 00:42, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating 2014-Present Section 

message: the long quotes in the early history section of this make it sound like a sales website. best removed altogether for tone. Halfoftheotherteam (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long quotations - advertising
Talk:Sanguszko

message: Dear Piotrus: I do think that is a right and fine page. I do not know why our dear Ghirlandajo hates the Sanguszkos so much. Gustav Korwin-Szwedowski 06:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Johnny Logan (singer)

message: Discography? 195.204.21.138 21:34, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 

message: Hello!  I am working on a disambiguation project, making sure that articles with links to the disambiguation page Adam point to their appropriate articles.  There is such a link in this article that refers to a character in a 1977 Irish musical called "Adam and Eve".  Is this musical about the story from the Bible, or does it just have characters with those names? -- KathrynLybarger (talk) 14:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say that it's an adaptation of The Apple Tree musical - which was later performed as the first act alone (The Diary of Adam and Eve). Not 100% sure it's the same musical though, so I'll take off the link anyway as it's nonsense.--Tuzapicabit (talk) 00:13, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Adam]] in Adam and Eve? 

message: His father was Patrick O'Hagan, and Logan's real surname is Sherrard. Could somebody explain? 86.42.71.111 (talk) 17:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name??

message: It is incredible that this singer's page didn't have any albums listed. I added just three from the recent releases hoping that some colleague would prepare a standard discography page containing all his singles and albums in chronological order werldwayd (talk) 19:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Albums

message: This artist is renowned internationally with hits in so many countries. We do need a separate comprehensive discography page with positions in various music charts, UK, Ireland and elsewhere. werldwayd (talk) 04:29, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for an expanded separate discography page
Talk:Alsou

message: Is this the girl known as Alsou Tenisheva, or is that somebody else? Drutt (talk) 07:48, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Alsou Tenisheva
Talk:Sandra Kim

message: The "lyrics of the song" do not claim that the singer is 15. No one regards song lyrics as being autobiographical. It was a song, for goodness sake. She might have been described separately (outside the song) as being 15, but that is another matterRoyalcourtier (talk) 23:41, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Madness 
Talk:Belgium in the Eurovision Song Contest

message: If Belgium has given 117 points to Germany and 115 to Ireland, why is Ireland silver and Germany bronze?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinsdagskind (talk • contribs) 08:44, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voting history 

message: Recently, I found out Mony Marc’s debut (1947 at the age of 12  and her birth year. (1934-1935), as well as her other involvements. However, I only figured that out after her page had been deleted. Is it possible to bring back her page with the new info? If so. I will add sources to my claim. Jusherman (talk) 20:15, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: What "other involvements" are we talking about? If there's new information that would help satisfy WP:GNG, WP:MUSICBIO and moves the article beyond WP:ONEEVENT as discussed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mony Marc then recreating the article would be pertinent, but it would depend on the information. What you provided above (year of birth and debut) doesn't add any further weight to recreating the article in my mind as the article would still fall under ONEEVENT. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 10:47, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mony Marc
Talk:Spaghetti Monster Orthodoxy

message: Since the spaghetti monster seeks to expose ludicrous usage of religion in debate, the orthodoxy page serves a very significant critical purpose.
*I restored the speedy deletion tag on the article, and agree more or less with the nomination (although not "patent nonsense" per the nomination, I would delete as a hoax or the very least, a non-notable group/sect).  Wikipedia is not the place for a satire article, which this appears to be.  There is no requirement that Wikipedia represent every person on the planet and their religious views.  I think this is desperately point of view, unverifiable, and soapboxing.  Delete with all possible speed. --Hansnesse 07:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this article should be deleted for the reason you've stated, but it is not a candidate for CSD G1 and should not be tagged as such. I've taken the liberty of replacing the speedy with a more accurate tag to reflect your post. --Muchness 07:10, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I have written a note to the speedy nominator to get his/her views.  I am happy to let this go though regular deletion channels.  --Hansnesse 07:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I restored the speedy deletion tag on the article, and agree more or less with the nomination (although not "patent nonsense" per the nomination, I would delete as a hoax or the very least, a non-notable group/sect). Wikipedia is not the place for a satire article, which this appears to be. There is no requirement that Wikipedia represent every person on the planet and their religious views. I think this is desperately point of view, unverifiable, and soapboxing. Delete with all possible speed. --Hansnesse 07:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who will eventually say
Talk:Dinuba, California

message: Interesting article about my home town, too bad you can't describe suckiness in the form of a statistic :-p
:That's funny... I've felt the same for a long time, but it's starting to look up. I suppose I may miss it when I go off to college. -71.195.98.16 05:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Nonconcatenative morphology

message: this is one article where a picture of the different tiers would greatly improve the explanation, i think. peace – ishwar  (speak) 06:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a pic. AnonMoos 21:57, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  hi. thanks for the visual. (simple is good for beginners). peace – ishwar  (speak) 05:41, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: images

message: The English alternation "foot ↔ feet" is not really a "remnant of older non-concatenative processes", since feet started out as something like fot-iz (with fully concatenative case-number suffix), the [o] vowel became fronted as a non-phonemic allophone before the [i] vowel in the next in the next syllable, and then became phonemically distinct from [o] when the [i] vowel reduced and was deleted. AnonMoos 00:43, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: anonmoos is right. foot => feet is an example of umlaut; ablaut is something different.  could someone who knows more than i do change that?
75.117.119.209 (talk) 02:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, there's not necessarily any direct contradiction between the modern English "foot" - "feet" alternation being umlaut in terms of 19th-century Indo-Europeanist terminology and also "ablaut" in terms of some versions of general 20th-century linguistic terminology... AnonMoos (talk) 21:21, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  A better example for an IE ablaut (which is inhered from the proto-language) is 'deem - doom' or 'sing - sang'. As far as we know, it was caused by a grammatical rule, in contrast with the i-umlaut in 'foot - feet', which is caused by old phonetic peculiarities that are no longer reminiscent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.42.187.46 (talk) 12:14, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Umlaut

message: Possible examples for an Umlaut Section
Umlaut 
Main article: Umlaut
When suffixes that contain a front vowel are added to the stem, the vowel in the stem becomes fronted.
This process can be seen in the kin terms in German[1]:
Bruder 'brother'  ←→  Brüderlein 'brother-dimin'
Frau     'woman'  ←→  Fräulein     'woman-dimin'  
Phillipvl (talk) 07:03, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Umlaut Examples 

message: Potential addition to articles Mainspace:
Internal stem change can involve the modification of vowels or consonants of the root. This process can occur alone, or in conjunction with affixation.
Phillipvl (talk) 07:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mainspace
Talk:Creation (unfinished film)

message: The synopsis and character list consistently refer to a major character, "Thorton Armitage." No source I have—or have seen—identifies any character other than Hallett, played in the existing footage by Ralf Harolde, of course. Are you certain that this is not "Thornton," as I have never encountered a character or person named "Thorton"? Ted Watson (talk) 20:47, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Thorton Armitage"?
Talk:Germany in the Eurovision Song Contest

message: I truly think this article's at least a C-class, maybe even B-class. What do you think? R&R. Sims2aholic8 (Michael) (talk) 22:57, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll give it a C for now, but I still think it should be a B though. Sims2aholic8 (Michael) (talk) 11:12, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I was about to give it an "start" lol, but I can live with C. Grk1011/Stephen (talk) 22:31, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Classification

message: The red used in the tables on these articles to designate last place is too dark, too bright and too dazzling. Could a decision be made to change it to a lighter shade, or to pink? Dadge (talk) 00:47, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Colour

message: ... from 1977 was in English, wasn't it? Aejsing (talk) 16:29, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes you're right, it was in English, so I've changed it.  L1975p (talk) 01:55, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silver Convention - Telegram 

message: Dear fellow Wikipedians,
I made a few edits to the "History" section of the page to add more depth on Germany's role in the founding of the Eurovision song contest, so please take a moment to review my edits if you can. I think that the "History" section is a little brief for the large role Germany had in the development and founding of the contest. 
Please let me know what you think.
Piper.richter (talk) 16:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  History
Talk:Charles Leclerc (general, born 1772)

message: I notice that this has a dispute tag on it, but no explanation here of what is disputed. User:Noclador, who added the dispute tag, wrote in his edit summary "tenures in the Army of Ireland and the Army of England??? hard to believe? can someone back this claim up???" I presume that is the statement of the dispute. I am not sure why it was stated as a dispute, rather than a request for citation, and I will attempt to contact him. - Jmabel | Talk 06:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While I don't have a citation for this, I don't see what is supposed to be odd about this. Both of these would, at that time, have been armies under the control of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. - 06:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

text: AH. makes more sense (and I didn't even look at Leclerc's dates before responding). Yes, probably right. In that era, the French tended to refer to "Army of …" meaning "expeditionary force to…" - Jmabel | Talk 01:42, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed

message: He was mentioned in the opening as "former slave", which is correct, but also misleading. He was also a forme slave owner, which makes a bit too much history for a simple mentioning, relevant is the fact that he was at the time of his arrest the "governor general" of the "French colony of Saint-Domingue" (colonie française de Saint-Domingue). So if someone has better choice of words, go ahead to rebrand the "Haitian leader". Kipala (talk) 18:23, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Toussaint Louverture

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Charlotte Claire. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 21:41, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Charlotte Claire" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Twin-screw type supercharger

message: "All supercharger types benefit from the use of an intercooler to reduce heat produced during pumping and compression."
While this is accurate it somewhat of an oversimplification. With the adiabatic efficiency of a lysholm (or at least the smaller ones) being in the high 80's to 90%, the benefit of intercooling is not particulary significant. And while ANY internal combustion engine will benefit from a cooler intake charge, a Roots, CSC, or turbo will benefit to a much larger extent. Perhaps this though could be more completely developed in the article. SteveOak25 (talk) 12:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: technical criticisms of this article
Talk:France in the Eurovision Song Contest

message: I added that France will not have the opportunity to compete in the 2020 Eurovision contest because of health and safety concerns related to the coronavirus pandemic. More will need to be added later about how this affects France in Eurovision once more information is available. Gingersnappin (talk) 19:09, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Covid-19 Cancellation  

message: Nothing about the fact that France has only ever performed in French, with only a handful of entries containing a smattering of English or other languages (and that this began only in 2001 and was controversial)? And that as this notionally bilingual concert has reduced French to an absolute minimum, France understandably remains the holdout in announcing points in French? -ProhibitOnions (T) 05:55, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Language
Talk:Luxembourg in the Eurovision Song Contest

message: "there is a rumour that they may make an appearance in the future, possibly 2008.''
Is this an encyclopedia or a gossip column in a Eurovision fanzine?
esctoday.com seems to be the most reliable of the bunch and seems to have been allowed to stand (e.g. I haven't heard about San Marino playing in 2008 anywhere BUT esctoday). I had thought TangoTV wanted to sign up but went bankrupt ... the 'official' Luxembourg network has said never again. 71.178.109.128 (talk) 19:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumour 

message: There's a remark ' The Luxembourg Government will therefore hold a debate to discuss the proposals set out on the petition, and the possible return of the country to the contest'. This is in future tense,  but I presume that this will have happened by now? Does anyone know about the outcome? effeietsanders 07:22, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  debate
Talk:History of astrology

message: I note User:Isambard_Kingdom's addition of an 'unsourced' tag today. For the record, I almost removed the IP edit wholesale for that reason earlier, plus bad spelling, punctuation and unintelligible language. Just sayin. -Roxy the dog™ woof 12:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  India section 

message: The "History of Astrology" article currently contains nothing about the recent history of astrology.
 		
There was recently an article in the March 2021 issue of "Career Astrologer" magazine, published by the Organization of Professional Astrologers, which gives an overview of the history of astrology in the 20th century.  This article, "How Astrology's Philosophy and Public Image have Evolved since 1890," by Philip Graves, is on pages 14-21 here: https://www.opaastrology.org/2021MarchEquinoxPUBLIC.pdf
For the purpose of the "History of Astrology" article, is there any objection to considering Philip Graves's article a reliable source?  
 Other Choices (talk) 15:30, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: If nobody objects, I'll feel free to use the cited source in a new section on the recent history of western astrology. Other Choices (talk) 15:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A source for the history of astrology in the 20th century