Talk:Grassroots fundraising

message: Now that I've weighed available sources deeper, with the benefit of distance, it appears "grassroots fundraising" would be expected to refer to any nonprofit or charitable organization, while the thrust of the current content relates only to politics. Accordingly I recommend moving to "political grassroots fundraising", and then populating "grassroots fundraising" with references such as grassrootsfundraising.org (the Grassroots Fundraising Journal) plus a summary and link of the political article. Because this article was originally created as an overflow of moneybomb content, the controversy appears dead now and this move should not be problematic. John J. Bulten (talk) 17:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the wikippropriate way of doing it would be to have it listed as Grassroots fundraising {politics}. I wouldn't object to such a move, though I think the usage for NPOs and such is not nearly as notable. Grassroots fundraising is usually a reference to political fundraising.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 18:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend move 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Grassroots fundraising. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080719223425/http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/11/06/post_184.html to http://blog.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2007/11/06/post_184.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:32, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The introduction of the article needs a source to back up the claim of those stated politicians using grassroots fundraising. Elijah B  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooldudeeli (talk • contribs) 22:14, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article tips.  

message: Very informative article, needs more sources though.Cooldudeeli (talk) 15:22, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  class review 

message: The first section (Strategies of Grassroots Fundraising) features several spelling and grammatical errors, and should be cleaned up considerably. Overall, the article seems to be prone to being influenced by editors' personal views and opinions (specifically the segments about lobby groups and Ron Paul's campaign). This can be remedied by increased citation, and from simply more objective editing.
DylanSchweizer (talk) 01:28, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NNGO 350 Review 

message: I like how organized, connected and informative your edits. Your selection of sources, and adding links, PDF, and citing for all the provided information.
 I believe adding more information about the history and dates of establishments, founders, of the Grassroots fundraising will help understand it better, in addition, visual or pictures can help the visual audience understand your point better.(Zahraniu2018 (talk) 02:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Candy's Peer Review