lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Divine Service (Lutheran)

message: This is a well written article. Still, it was written from the standpoint of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod. I chose to use the Common Service Book of 1917 as the source because it was the first widely used, English Language service book. As far as I can determine, all modern Lutheran hymnals are in some way related to or derived from the Common Service Book of 1917. (See Frank Senn's book, Christian Liturgy: Catholic and Evangelical, pp 588-591.) 
The author states the following regarding confession and absolution: "Within the last 200 years it has been the practice in every Divine Service to observe it [the absolution] at this point [immediately after the invocation].  By comparing hymnals produced since 1917, it is easy to see that this statement is in error. As an example, I have before me the Service Book and Hymnal of 1958. Each setting of the Communion Service contains the Declaration of Grace rather then the Absolution. The absolution, with its performative word, is found in the separate rites of public confession and absolution, but not in the common service. (A long form of the performative word in the absolution is "I therefore declare unto you who do truly repent and believe in him, the entire forgiveness of all your sins'; a shorter form of the performative word is "I forgive you all your sins.") 
An examination of the Communion Service in the hymnals of the last hundred years clearly shows that the Confession and the Declaration of Grace to be the liturgical standard, with the Confession and Absolution as the recent innovation. Historically, the Confession, the Declaration of Grace, and the Absolution were not part of the Divine Service. Luther's German Mass contained none of them, and needed none of them, for everyone who desired to partake of the sacrament had announced their intention to commune, and had been prepared through private confession with the pastor. Our abandonment of private confession has led to an incorporation of the rite into the common service, yet this practice is outside the historic practice of the one, holy, and apostolic church. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carlsonloggie (talk • contribs) 00:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: The introductory definition of Divine Service at the beginning of the article appears to be incomplete insofar as it refers only to a Lutheran context. The term also has significance among other Protestant churches and in the Eastern Orthodox Church.   Acknowledgment of other ways in which the term is used would be helpful here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gruener (talk • contribs) 00:11, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other definitions
Talk:Indian locomotive class WDP-4

message: WDAP-5 is a not a subclass of this locomotive and it also is pretty notable to have its own page, therefore, I think it doesn't need a section here within WDP-4. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 09:00, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Noted. But, WAG11 too is being made by cannibalising older wdp-4. One can then say that WAG11 too deserves a space here. However, since it will be removed later on, I'm okay with it. Field Marshal Aryan (talk) 10:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  WDAP-5 not needed here 
Talk:Walt Disney Animation Australia

message: What has happened with Disney Toon America? The article says that Disney Toon Australia was closed down, but doesn't say anything about the American version. Or was it simply poorly worded so as to look like the phrase only pertained to the Australian studios, but actually addressed both? --Matt T. 08:50, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

message: * I find interesting how many times the names change each direction.  I know that the box from the DVD state Lady and the Tramp II: Scamp's Adventure, and The Fox and the Hound 2.  Yet it continues to change on this page.Kidsheaven 23:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 2 or II in Movie Names

message: The two studio have the same history and are explicitely the same... so could we merge them?Gdgourou 08:01, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Walt Disney Animation Australia 

message: Closing titles say it was produced by Walt Disney Television Animation, not DisneyToon Studios. Producers are Alan Zaslove and Tad Stones (both known for Chip 'n Dale Rescue Rangers and Aladdin (TV series)). Remove from list? Alone Coder (talk) 15:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: DuckTales the Movie: Treasure of the Lost Lamp was produced by Walt Disney Television Animation too. I remove both. Alone Coder (talk) 00:31, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Return of Jafar (1994)
Talk:Achintya Bheda Abheda

message: Some of links in the section do not belong to this article. Possibly belong to other. Wikidās ॐ 18:43, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki is not

message: I might be wrong because I'm not a native speaker, but the Devanagari text does not seem to correspond to the IAST. Could someone check "सचेत तत् त्वम् असि"? To me it reads something like "saceta tat tvam asi". Thanks. Manufaure 08:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Devanagari text
Talk:Geography of Oceania

message: I've removed the following introductory line: Oceania is the world’s eleventh largest continent, in terms of size, and tenth largest in terms of population.
Oceania is not usually regarded as a continent. Only seven regions of the earth's surface usually are: North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia, and Antarctica. As such, calling this the world's eleventh largest continent is at best misleading, at worst, complete BS. Grutness...wha? 05:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Eleventh largest continent"??

message: Is there any value in this article? Should it just be redirected to Oceania, which discusses the extent of the region in more detail?-gadfium 19:42, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose of article
Talk:Shuddhadvaita

message: There has been a proposal to merge the two above articles. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume there won't be any objections, but will wait for at least 3-4 days before finalizing the merge. Abecedare (talk) 03:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good point, Ism and Wikidas! I'll try to clean up the two articles and remove redundancies over the next few days. Abecedare (talk) 15:23, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Shuddhadvaita]] and [[Pushtimarg]]

message: The article is filled with hindi spellings i.e., "vaad" in place of vAda, adwait in place of advaita, et cetera. These need to be changed to sanskrit style spellings.. leaflord (talk) 14:19, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hindi to Sanskrit
Talk:Grandiloquence

message: *Grandiloquence is mostly a synonym of logorrhoea, with some nuances noted at Talk:Logorrhoea (linguistics). As written, Grandiloquence is an quite miserable stub that would not survive AfD in all probability, because of WP:DICDEF among numerous other problems, including lack of sources for alleged direct quotations, and lack of referencing for apparent weasel-worded claims. I plan to merge the articles (per nearly three months worth of merge tagging), barring any substantive objections. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 09:13, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As of October 2021, over a decade later, there exists a non-redirect Grandiloquence page, with content. I eliminated the redirect in Talk:Grandiloquence and restored the above comment.KazKylheku (talk) 13:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal to [[:Logorrhoea (linguistics)]]
Talk:ITV Digital

message: Advent Television in Singapore was the first licensed commercial DVB-T network, broadcasting from February 1998. ONdigital didn't broadcast until November 1998.
https://www.imda.gov.sg/-/media/imda/files/inner/archive/policies-and-regulation/policies_and_regulation_level3/fixed-wireless-broadband/response_-_dataone_limited.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.196.168.74 (talk) 22:30, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Not the world's first digital terrestrial television network

message: The link is dead.  Please don't re-add it. ---J.S (t|c) 06:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: YouTube Link...

message: Did they really only get £4 in damages? I'd have thought it must be £4m in damages. Can someone clear this up?
:It really was only £4. Check the link to the BBC news report from 2006. -- Arwel (talk) 00:07, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably too much. Claverhouse (talk) 03:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Damages Amount Incorrect?

message: The article fails to mention that ONdigital STBs were originally bought outright from electrical stores such as Currys - mine, for instance, was a Philips DTX6370 which cost, at the time of buying, some £200. However retailers generally would not supply an STB to people whose postcode was not listed as having ONdigital coverage.
Very shortly after I bought my STB (in April/May 1999 as far as I remember), and apparently in response to Sky's "free" DigiBox offer, ONdigital started their "loan" scheme. Those, like me, who bought their boxes outright as early adopters, were exempt from the (ultimately failed) attempt to reclaim STBs as the boxes were our property, not that of ITV Digital's administrators.
The article also omits the ONdigital aerial subsidy - people living in areas supposedly with full ONd coverage who were experiencing reception problems could apply for a replacement TV aerial for a flat fee (including a high gain aerial, cables and installation by an ONd-selected contractor) of £50. This improved reception considerably, but must have cost ONdigital a packet! Tonywalton Talk 11:32, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Set Top Boxes were originally bought outright, also ONd paid for aerial upgrades

message: As the original sotware can only cope with "2K" modulation, and at DSO the transmiiters are switched to 8K non of the OnDigital branded boxes work.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.1.82 (talk) 17:31, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it's also a matter of the hardware inside the boxes too, rather than just the software. Have added a note to the relevant section. Bonusballs (talk) 20:57, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  After Digital Switch Over (DSO) ONDigital Boxes no longer work. 

message: What picture formats were offered on ITV Digital? I assume SD 576i only? John a s (talk) 11:53, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. What were you expecting? 83.104.249.240 (talk) 15:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture format
Talk:Patterson railway station

message: []  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.22.50.32 (talk) 07:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This is referring to a campaign promise made by a Victorian Liberal Party candidate for Bentleigh's Legislative Council seat in the 2018 state election, who lost to Labor Party candidate Nick Staikos,  who approved the installation of more contemporary PIDs throughout walkways and on platforms of Patterson Station.   SuIfate (talk) 02:01, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future station upgrade
Talk:Yad Kennedy

message: The article states "The memorial, 60 feet high, [...] is encircled by 51 columns, each bearing the emblem of a state."  If these are United states, what is the 51st?  Aren't there only 50 states in the U.S.A.?  And if these are nation-states, like Syria and Canada, should that be made clear? Beobach972 (talk) 23:46, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The article notes that the panels are for the 50 states plus the District of Columbia. However if this was not clear to you I'll edit a little to make it clearer. NearTheZoo (talk) 02:28, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: What 51 states?

message: I have the following image of the Yad Kennedy structure:
left|thumb
Would anyone object if I replaced the top image on the article with this one?  This new one is higher resolution and public domain.  It also shows the "eternal flame" (a light bulb) through the entrance.
Wilson44691 (talk) 13:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If you're sure it's public domain, then by all means -- go for it! Thanks! NearTheZoo (talk) 02:29, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good news. I was able to add an Israel copyright permission tag to your photo. Click on your photo to see it.
NearTheZoo (talk) 03:36, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

text: Thanks! Wilson44691 (talk) 22:55, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replace the top photo with this one? 

message: I think it would be good to add a few more photos (perhaps as part of a gallery) to show images such as the JFK bust and the memorial wall.  If anyone has photos to add, please do.  Otherwise, if anyone reading this note lives in Jerusalem, please consider taking some photos and uploading them. (Otherwise, I hope to be in Israel this December, and I'll try to do that.) Thanks! NearTheZoo (talk) 14:43, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: My thanks to Gilabrand for adding beautiful new photos! NearTheZoo (talk) 00:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More photos? 

message: If anyone has a photo from this visit, I would like to add it to this article. NearTheZoo (talk) 15:06, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo from visit of USS John F. Kennedy officers and crew 
Talk:Schmaltz herring

message: Shouldn't the second word of title be uncapitalized ("herring")? AnonMoos 07:01, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Letter case?

message: * Schmaltz herring - Can we change it? RPSM (talk) 10:50, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct spelling - sch
Talk:Harriet Taylor Mill

message: "Taylor also took part in the agitation for women to be allowed to take part in local government and after the passing of the 1870 Education Act served as a member of the London School Board."
If she died in 1858, then this sentence is in error. Ryanluck (talk) 11:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date discrepancy 

message: I have made a few edits to this page, some minor, but important. Harriet Taylor Mill is notable enough to have her own Wikipedia page, yet she is discussed in terms of the men in her life, most notably John Stuart Mill. Though he played an important role in her life, she still made contributions of her own. In order to do her justice and ensure the accuracy of her page, it is important to give her credit where credit is due and speak of her life as her own, not accomplishments due to others. Evidence shows that John Stuart Mill was given full credit for works she was a part of, so in order to correctly report history, it is vital that she is accurately accredited. Additionally, minor facts such as when she was born and who her family is, are important details to add to make the account her life more accurate and holistic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nelson1013 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor Edits, Major Difference 

message: I'm attempting a full-scale rewrite of the article in my sandbox. I made a start with some initial edits and some structural changes, but I am now reading and compiling notes before I make further changes. Anyone who is interested is welcome to contribute, but please don't feel that you have to. I'm hoping to move my draft to the mainspace in late July or August. Josh Milburn (talk) 11:23, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note to anyone watching this article
Talk:Drone (Star Trek: Voyager)

message: So who wrote it ?  Who directed it ? -- Beardo 07:15, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

message: I've never edited wikipedia before, but I was reading this article and noticed a grammar error (was instead of were) and a redundant phrase at the end of a sentence.  I fixed them.  I *think* that's what's supposed to happen, but if I blew it, please revert the article and accept my apologies.
: That's fine. Thanks for fixing it. It would have been better if you had written an edit summary to explain what you were fixing but essentially yes that is what is supposed to happen. -- 109.76.129.242 (talk) 11:07, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  No idea about procedures...
Talk:Hope and Fear

message: So - who wrote it ? Who directed it ? -- Beardo 07:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm aiming to expand this shortly. I had a look at Star Trek: Action! in the British Library today and after taking handwritten notes for twenty minutes I realised I'd covered exactly two pages of the book. There is a hell of a lot of information in there about this episode and so I've simply ordered a copy from eBay. So once that arrives in the post, I'll conduct an expansion of this article from that source. Miyagawa (talk) 20:16, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: *Well I got well and truly sidetracked! But I'm going to start on the expansion now. Miyagawa (talk) 23:43, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion coming 

message: The section "Arturis" says, "...wanted him to have a human appearance in profile but when seen from the side to appear more alien". However, "in profile" means "from the side". One or the other of these should presumably read "from the front", but I don't know which one. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 21:17, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at pictures of the character, I'd say it's most likely that he's designed to look more human from the front and alien from the side. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 00:01, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've fixed that. Well spotted. Miyagawa (talk) 15:16, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  In profile
Talk:Belief–desire–intention model

message: 1. no reference
2. it was copied verbatim from copyrighted work (see second paragraph): http://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/people/michael.wooldridge/pubs/atal98b.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Crenshaw (talk • contribs) 05:13, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed criticism section 

message: This here doesn't work: . --Ben  T/C  07:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed link 
Talk:Toyota W transmission

message: Stop removing the IS300 from under the W55 section.  Yes, hard to believe but the IS300 in the US really did come with a W55.
There is a rather detailed listing of which transmissions were used with which engines between 1981 and 1990
about 2/3 of the way down this page:
http://www.barneymc.com/Toy_root/techtalk/drivline/transmsn.htm
The info there could be quite a valuable addition to this page... if it's accurate.
66.27.87.88 06:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Personal income in the United States

message: Why do they stop the data at $100,000 per year? In San Jose, California it takes maybe $250,000 just to buy a house. $100,000 is still poverty level. Seriously.
162.207.203.26 (talk) 14:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Income Distribution section 

message: The data available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_income_in_the_United_States#Over_time,_by_ethnicity_and_sex appears not to be currently available.  The stated source information, "Taken from World Almanac (in turn sourced to US Census Bureau)," is not sufficient to validate the data.  If the information was previously correct, then it would be helpful to have more detailed information (e.g., "Taken from World Almanac in X year").  Otherwise, this should be updated with currently valid information. Riskanal (talk) 19:46, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obsolete or incomplete data on this page 

message: I post this comment in hopes that someone with knowledge and the time to do it, will spend the effort and improve these charts to show 50 years as does the this chart. The first three charts in the article today cover 15 years, yet almost all workers will work 45 years, or more, 3 times longer. Full Social Security retirement is now 67. At high school graduation, 42% are 17-years-old. If they work till SS full retirement age that will be a working lifetime of 50 years, 3.5 times the length of these charts. If this article is going to illustrate how income changes, I think, it must show a time period equal to 100% of full working lifetime, not just 27% of a full working lifetime. If I can find the time I will redo these charts. Nick Beeson (talk) 20:37, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short time period
Talk:Tiffany Grant

message: Where is the source for this? Has ADV even announced this yet, I mean I remember them hinting they had, but do they still? Can we be sure she's working on this? - 24.0.220.96 (talk) 02:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sgt. Frog 

message: Is this meant to be ADR scriptwriter? Josh Parris 15:57, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "ADR Script"

message: I recently came across a link on Tiffany Grant's website to a Yahoo fanclub page dedicated to her. Interestingly, according to her various posts, she seems to be against the idea of Shinji and Asuka being together, despite the fact that they clearly developed feelings for each other. I was very surprised by this, as I would have felt that she would have recognised Asuka's feelings for Shinji, having portrayed the character. I guess she feels that they are not right together.
Also, I could have misread this, but she seemed to imply in one post that Yuko Miyamura feels the same way as her about Shinji and Asuka, when she tells this guy that she told Ms. Miyamura about these "sick" things he said about Shinji and Asuka being meant for each other, and she apparently agreed with her. It makes me wonder if Tiffany Grant's opinions on this have changed now, together with Yuko Miyamura's thoughts, if she actually does feel the same way.  
You can easily find those comments on the website if you type in things into the search engine like "Shinji and Asuka meant to be together" and "Shinji and Asuka ICK." She comically insults and threatens this one guy who like me (and probably most Eva fans) feels that Shinji and Asuka are meant for each other. 
zictor23 23:44, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Tiffany Grant's thoughts on Shinji and Asuka's relationship

message: Even if the mistakes were corrected by the subject, we should include interviews from reliable sources where necessary. Any ideas? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 07:02, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:College Scholastic Ability Test

message: Something is not right about the "3rd Thursday in November" statement. The past 2 test dates, 12or13-Nov-2008 and 12-Nov-2009 are not 3rd Thursdays. 121.138.91.200 (talk) 07:15, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Test date 

message: I think the "Korea Institute for Curriculum and Examination" might have a new name. This is what I found:
http://www.kice.re.kr/en/index.do
This is a website for KICE, Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.241.110.50 (talk) 04:39, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: Well, I think College Scholastic Ability Test (South Korea)#Preliminary College Scholastic Ability Test(PCSAT) can be split into two article: one for PCSAT and one for Simulated CSAT. If nobody objects, I will split it after 22 Nov. — revimsg 13:20, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You can split it now, I think. KJ Discuss? 13:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah... I almost forgot about this. I'll do it soon. — Revi 13:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Don't split. The article is too short to split; see WP:SIZE. --George Ho (talk) 23:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't worry, I'm too busy in real life to do big edits. — regards, Revi 06:15, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split? 
Talk:Movement for the Actualization of the Sovereign State of Biafra

message: The 200,000 number seems to be pulled out of thin air (it was first entered as 20,000, then changed to 2,000, then changed to 200,000, all without reason or citation). In addition, the article is basically exactly the same as it was when first started, and the first article comes across as written by a member. I'll cut out a few of the most notably NPOV things... zafiroblue05 | Talk 07:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV