lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vivāha

message: Page created by: 202.9.146.106 12:05, 19 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: Involves Christian, Jewish, Buddhist, Hindu, Confucian
Main discussion at Talk:Jewish view of marriage#Requested move : "religion-X's view of marriage" to "religion-X's teaching on marriage". Zargulon 23:52, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move : "religion-X's view of marriage" to "religion-X's teaching on marriage"

message: The deletion tag has been removed and I don't particularly object as there has been some clean up.  There is till more work to be done.  In conversation with the editor who had done the clean up,User:M.arunprasad, he stated "I worked on it, but later realised people all over India don't follow the same rituals. It differs from state to state and religion to religion. So It can be merged with some article instead of being a seperate article and get deleted. --M.arunprasad 11:31, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Work still required 

message: This page seems to deal with customs of the wedding ceremony and nothing at all to do with beliefs about marriage after the ceremony.  "Marriage" refers to the long term, so at best, the title is confusing. --Scottandrewhutchins 16:09, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage?

message: The dharmaśāstra texts recognize at least eight types of marriage. The content of this article appears to describe the svayamavara. Descriptions of the others should be given, especially if this article is about Hindu marriage customs. Sarayuparin 04:41, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which marriage type?? 

message: Moved this page to Vivāha after someone else moved it from Vivaha to Vivaham. The last is a regional pronunciation of the Sanskrit term, which is accurately transliterated as vivāha. Imc (talk) 18:43, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: The name
Talk:Raiden (video game)

message: I am happy that this article is finally receiving edits to greatly increase the quality. For the longest time, there had been too much fan cruft in this and all other Raiden articles, plus excessive use of fan-made names for the narrative elements in this game, such as "The Cranassians" for the main antagonists of the series. It read more like a Raiden fanpage than a proper encyclopedic article...until now. Let's keep it up! JudgeSpear (talk) 22:16, 14 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  The latest updates are fantastic 

message: I'm trying to find a game from my childhood. Does anyone know if this, or more likely one of it's sequels had you fly over a backdrop of a nazca condor? -- Paul Arzul 2006-02-02 21:00 (UTC)
:The best place to ask would be at the Killer List of Videogames (the actual site, not the article). — Frecklefoot | Talk 00:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Space Megaforce made heavy use of Nazca line motif in it's backgrounds, so that might be the one you're thinking of. -JArcane --66.220.99.10 04:20, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Trying to find game

message: The article says that "Raiden is ... revived through a MAME ROM and can run on a variety of modern systems, including PCs." It's true that MAME can emulate the game, but in order to play it legally you still need the original arcade pcbs (which are easily purchased from, for example, ebay). Alternatively you can use various home computer/console versions to play it. I'd mention those rather than the currently mentioned more difficult and legally grey way to play the game. Any comments? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.42.61 (talk • contribs) 
:I know this has come up before, but I can't remember what the consensus was.  We could just mention that it's probably illegal in most areas to use MAME ROMs w/o owning the PCBs. Other than that, we're not in the role of telling people what to do.  That crosses the line of NPOV. — Frecklefσσt | Talk 13:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "revived through a MAME ROM" 

message: Right now it says that Raiden had a PSN release in 2002. As far as I know, that can't possibly be right. Moby games says the PS3/PSP PSN release was Mar 29 2007, and the Vita PSN release was August 28, 2012. I'm not sure exactly how to go about formatting the update, but it seems like a correction may be needed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.227.249.131 (talk) 16:21, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've corrected that. Here's also the exact release dates for 4 of the ports for Raiden Trad as well: 1, 2, 3, 4. KGRAMR (talk) 20:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PSN Release Date
Talk:RFK Racing

message: There needs to be some edits because of recent layoffs. If you have time to make the changes please do so. Thanks. Resource  Joseph507357 (talk) 21:22, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layoffs 

message: This page is 643,491 bytes long, which is far too big. What's the best way to subdivide it? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Having had no response, I've now split the page onto three; each of the two new pages is still too long. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:27, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page size
Talk:1967 NHL expansion

message: I don't know how to change links and whatnot, but at the very bottom of this article it mentions the WHA and Bobby Orr's contract. It was actually Bobby Hull.
: No, it's accurate as it stands.  The first big salary push came with Orr's first big contract, while Hull (the great marquee star of the game at the time) was still being paid peanuts.    Ravenswing  13:13, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orr/Hull
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Bensaccount/Archive 1

message: Bensaccount, you said "I won't even bother any more" in your response. The point of this RFC isn't to run you off the articles so you no longer contribute. The point is to get you to contribute within NPOV policy. If you refuse to follow NPOV policy and stop contributing, that's your choice, but another option is to make your contributions so that they also follow policy. That's another choice available to you. It means you'll have to learn the policy and understand what you need to change to follow it, but it's a choice available to you if you choose it. FuelWagon 16:10, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: choice

message: I am withdrawing the request to delete this RFC at least until the dispute with SlimVirgin is figured out. If a request to delete, archive, or delist the RFC is made in the future, SlimVirgin should not be the admin to handle it. For the moment, I believe the RFC can be "delisted" from the current list of active RFC's. We can get a neutral admin to figure out if it should be archived or what. But at the moment, I don't want this page deleted until this dispute with SlimVirgin is handled, hopefully somewhere OTHER than this RFC talk page. FuelWagon 17:01, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: no delete

message: SlimVirgin, given your declared bias against me, I'm going to ask you to remove yourself from this discussion completely. FuelWagon 19:52, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: SlimVirgin

message: Well, Bensaccount has made clear the dispute is not resolved. Given that, I've recertified so that this can find some sort of resolution. FuelWagon 20:09, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: unresolved
Talk:Ernst Witt

message: Initial revision: translation from German Wikipedia article.
IMO, much is still missing. I'd be particularly interested in his rôle during the Nazi regime. Can anyone fill in?
-- 134.155.89.64 15:45, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article on the Leech lattice is more favourable to Witt than this one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.162.189.26 (talk) 17:30, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leech lattice
Talk:East Rock

message: Please note that I've changed the elevation for East Rock to 359 feet.  This is based on the New Haven Data Book, published by the City of New Haven, and available on the web here: .  However, no particular geographical survey is cited in that document; if someone has documentation for a higher altitude, please post it in this space. Chick Bowen 15:50, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've changed the elevation to 366' based on a map published by the city of New Haven. You can see it via the link in the link section of article. The Giant Steps are an actual name for the trail, according to the city. I've also moved the lengthy info on the monument to its own page. hope you like the changes!--Pgagnon999 (talk) 16:31, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Linda Blair

message: you read the topic right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.250.27.74 (talk) 16:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference 33 is invalid and removed from the internet. Valve, Please fix 

message: It states she is Married to Pat Benatar. That is incorrect. 2603:8001:B801:1100:9587:BF35:E232:DC31 (talk) 07:56, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see where it says that? Knitsey (talk) 11:08, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linda Blair has never been married. Pat Benatar is married to a man.
Talk:Phil Margera

message: "Phil claimed his reason for losing weight was to extend his life" - what is the purpose and justification for the use of the verb "to claim" here? Is the given reason somehow challenged? This choice of words makes it sound dubious and I wonder what the rationale for this is. --84.249.164.59 (talk) 03:51, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weasel word
Category talk:Sonic the Hedgehog characters

message: I slightly object to the term "villains" in all of these cases. Granted, Dr. Eggman and others are certainly villains, but some are not. Particularly, I am thinking of Shadow the Hedgehog and Rouge the Bat. Their classification as villains is dodgy at best... perhaps they would be better as anti-heroes, I don't know. I don't particularly consider Gerald Robotnik a villain either, regardless of what he did to ARK. I have made similar comments in Template:Sonic's talk page. -- Supermorff 16:07, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Semeru

message: In Indonesia the semeru volcano (mount semeru) had its debris flying away to the village of lumajang I heard this from Indonesian news. And so that’s it Mark justino hurka (talk) 04:34, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we add the lumajang news also? 

message: The article says "This stratovolcano is also known as Mahameru, meaning "The Great Mountain" in Sanskrit.[3]". A quick look at the corresponding source given, provides "The steep-sided volcano, also referred to as Mahameru (Great Mountain), rises above coastal plains to the south". No mention of Sanskrit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.85.24.138 (talk) 14:26, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sanskrit!? 

message: The article says that (1) this is the highest mountain on an island in the ocean, Java, and (2) the prominence is 166 meters less than its elevation.
Both cannot be true.
Possibly the prominence was taken from some rounded figure (3500m).
In any case, the article should be changed so that the prominence and elevation are the same, assuming that the mountain is the highest on Java. 2601:600:9780:17D0:1425:9D84:B5E6:EBD6 (talk) 00:25, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prominence or elevation error
Talk:Megaparsec

message: What is the meaning of Mpc/h ?
I find this as a unit scale on some simulation images of galactic clustering.
For example, check http://www.aip.de/People/AKhalatyan/COSMOLOGY/MareNostrum/
I later found that h is the Hubble Constant (H), as a fraction of 100 km/sec/Mpc.
Since H is about 70 km/sec/Mpc, and 70 = 0.7 * 100, we have h = 0.7.
216.221.56.20 03:37, 18 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Much of the uncertainty in distances is due to the uncertainty in h. By expressing distances as a ratio to h, the uncertainty of the ratio can be much less, and whatever the current value of h is may be plugged in later to find the right distance. -- Xerxes 00:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mpc/h
Talk:Wario's Woods

message: The line, "Because Nintendo Power ceased coverage of NES games starting with its March 1994 issue (the NES version was released in December that year), it only reviewed the SNES version of Wario's Woods, awarding it a score of 3.375 out of 5.[16]" is inaccurate, and its citation is to a different video game website with it's own erroneous citation. This game was in fact the last NES game reviewed by Nintendo Power, in its December 1994 issue. They significantly reduced the number of NES games they covered through 1994, but didn't actually stop until the NES was done.
I'd edit the page myself, but this would be my first time contributing to Wikipedia and I have no idea what I'm doing. (I even had to look up how to post this comment). In order to make a citation for this information, I'd have to direct readers to a webpage with scanned versions of old Nintendo Power magazines, and I don't know if that's kosher with regard to Wikipedia rules. Joe Loud (talk) 23:53, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nintendo Power reference 

message: Toad isn’t the main character of any previous games Tttttoad (talk) 18:16, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can I add that this is Toad’s 1st starring game?
Talk:Yoo-hoo

message: Mentioned in How I Met Your Mother in Episode 12, Season 2  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kroocker (talk • contribs) 16:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No one cares. - PM800 (talk) 00:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Please note 

message: I have removed the following entry:  "A very similar drink is sold in Germany as "Münsterland Classico Kakao-Drink" as this is only a regional brand and there is now a plethora of prepackaged chocolate-milk drinks. --Maikel 16:23, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Münsterland Classico

message: Just me or does the majority of this page read like it was copy and pasted together from a corprate website or press releases.--68.231.174.183 09:46, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Poorly Worded

message: The official website spells it Yoo-hoo (lower case h) while this article uses a capital h.  I will change the text, but I think the article name needs to be changed.  Prometheus-X303- 05:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You are correct, sir! — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 18:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

text: It should be noted at wiki articles cannot start with a lower case letter. DewDude 20:50, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How does that apply? It's Yoo-hoo. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 21:05, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoo-hoo 

message: I want to order powder mix strawberry DwayneCarmen (talk) 22:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strawberry yoohoo 

message: Where can I buy or order powder mix strawberry yoohoo DwayneCarmen (talk) 22:04, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order 

message: In case anyone believes Yoo-hoo's manipulative claims that it introduced the chocolate-banana and chocolate-mint flavors in "the new millennium," reliable sources show they introduced in the mid-1990s. Do NOT revert my edits.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8000:2D42:FDC5:7C15:46CB:98E3:FABE (talk) 05:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corporate lies 

message: beyond the strange claim that such a catch phrase would be used to appeal to older instead of younger demographics, the complete lack of evidence that such a catch phrase existed makes the whole section highly suspect. there is ample evidence of a mid-50s campaign with a number of New York Yankees players (including Berra), and print material with Mickey Mantle that employs the catch phrase "Me for Yoo-Hoo" is ubiquitous 2600:4040:5165:2100:8942:A16A:E2EA:D94D (talk) 15:43, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "It's Me-He for Yoo-Hoo!"
Talk:Jeannette Thurber

message: Excellent link, "Willmcw". Nice contribution. J. Van Meter 16:34, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's still short, but I added some copy. The item contains the necessary details and a bit more, so I took off the stub tag. Jeffmatt (talk) 07:12, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: removed stub tag
Talk:D.O.A. (1950 film)

message: ===Physician===
Note:  Moving this section from article because there are no citations. Luigibob (talk) 20:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Physician Consultant

message: Note:  Moving this section from article because there are no citations. Luigibob (talk) 20:50, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Physician

message: Look, I still argue for free choice ( it just has to be mad by the collective sum somewhat measurable accountabible )   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.173.183.46 (talk) 02:47, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trades of a Salesman 

message: This is the game where light sources are your biggest enemies! 
::What are you in real life? Promoter?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4DD7:6FC:0:2875:3E9A:FADD:8014 (talk) 09:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Lucifer
Also gut, ich wurde anscheinend geboren mit der Fähigkeit, besser Englisch zu können, als die Einheimischen. Was nun? Was würdet ihr tun? Den Verdacht weglenken? Oder fragen, wie das passieren konnte?   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:4DD7:6FC:0:2875:3E9A:FADD:8014 (talk) 10:10, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valheim 

message: IP, please don't add material sourced to wikis - see WP:USERG. If you want to include that you will need reliable secondary sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:23, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Sourcing
Talk:The Man Who Knew Too Much (1934 film)

message: I've removed the statement that the film is currently in the Public Domain, as the US Copyright Office lists the film as having it's US rights restored (see document dated 22/Aug/1997). Davepattern 17:29, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  copyright status 

message: Is it completely necessary to have a citation for the cameo appearance considering it can simply be confirmed by watching the film?--RedKnight (talk) 21:36, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  cameo appearance 

message: Why is The Thin Man suddenly mentioned? I don't really see the connection. The whole section could benefit from rewriting. --Stm76 (talk) 10:19, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Thin Man 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MLauba (talk) 12:17, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I don't know if it's of any interest, but Bernard (later Lord Miles) plays one of the polcemen in the final shoot-out. Source - the film itself. He played a much larger part in the 1956 version. Gramorak (talk 15:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast 

message: I have deleted the link to the illicit hosting of this British film on Internet Archive. Co-writer Charles Bennett did not die until 1995, so UK copyright subsists until the end of 2065. As a non-US film still under copyright in its country of origin on 1 January 1996, it is protected in the US for 95 years after publication, so to the end of 2029. Nick Cooper (talk) 22:15, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status redux 

message: In the Production section, the word "phonetically" is linked to the article entitled "Phonetics," but that says nothing at all about pronouncing words phonetically, so I've removed the link.  --  Pete Best Beatles (talk) 05:37, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weak link
Talk:Mike McLaughlin

message: I expanded the article quite a bit, although I'd like more info and maybe photos of his modified days. --D-Day  My fan mail. Click to view my evil userboxes 23:45, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 
Talk:Willis Building (London)

message: I thought a building has to be at least 40 floors to be considered a skyscraper?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.6.84.214 (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  term skyscraper 

message: 51 Lime Street is to be called The Willis Building (see British Land site) --DominicSayers 14:04, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Willis Building 

message: This article lacks something vitally important, who is the architect? Some dates on when it submitted a planning application, planning approval, ground breaking etc. would be useful too. Information on what happened before construction such as changes to design (if any) and problems with the planning could be added. These would all make this article a lot better - Erebus555 18:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, its Foster and Partners. One of Lord Foster's earliest projects was the original Willis Faber Dumas building in Ipswich. The information is already in the article, but you have to look very closely to find it - just click on the first image in the gallery. Keep clicking through until you get a full size version then scroll over to the information sign on the side of the building. The name of the architects are mentioned on that sign ;-) It would probably be a good idea to mention it more explicitly. -- 18:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Aha. Thanks for that. Foster and Partners are great architects. I will try and get other information on what I said previously to add to the article. - Erebus555 18:54, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Architect? 

message: Nice pic, but I think a view from St Helens Square is needed as well, to show the proper "stepped" shape of the building,
i.e. a side view.
Wjfox2005 12:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main photo 

message: The Willis Building is popularly known as the Prawn, though this has apparently not found favour with the architects;
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-35092279
Meltingpot (talk) 09:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have never once heard it be called that, until I read the BBC's "news" story. --TBM10 (talk) 16:40, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Nickname
Talk:Rugby League Tri-Nations

message: The actual "tri-nations" (Australia?, Great Britain?, New Zealand?) should be explicitly mentioned very early on in the article. As of now, the reader just eventually stumbles upon the names and could be misled by the line, "...in which the best teams in the world play..."
:Fair point, will re-phrase. Grinner 08:41, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 
File talk:WikiMeet London - Jimbo talks.jpg

message: He looks drunk. Nice way to represent Wikipedia....
--Arm 17:42, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The elixir of life, he can really see that stuff away. ed g2s • talk 18:37, 5 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What brand of alcohol is that? Never heard of it. --Arm 18:32, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: "The elixir of life is legendary potion or drink that grants the imbiber eternal life, and a beard.". ed g2s • talk 21:46, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What bottle is he holding?