Talk:Beast (video game)

message: Perhaps, there is a little inaccuracy:
In my version it is not possible to crush a beast between
a wall and another beast <>WHH
Another interesting thing: I tried to prevent a hatched
beast from moving (not easy but possible), but,
surprisingly, it didn't explode.
Note there is a two player mode as well.
I did a little disassembly and created a version which
can be set to work with a modern PC -
ask for it here:
maxplanck herecomesat seznam herecomesdot cz
88.101.32.104 21:09, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

message: I believe the correct title of this game is Beast but seing as how that isn't unique, I think the page should be moved to Beast (ASCII game) or Beast (video game) comments? McKay 15:34, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree on the capitalization, though it's clearly an ASCII game, not a video game. It's in the gray zone, because its graphics are plain ASCII and "things move around" unlike many other ASCII games. For comparison, space invaders is a video game (not using ASCII) so I'd say Beast is an ASCII game. Cyborg 10:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, I'm thinking that ASCII games are a subset of video games. Is that not correct? I'm not trying to discount it's status as an ASCII game, but I think that according to WP:CVG, the "(video game)" is more preferred to other disambiguators. McKay 17:54, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

text: done! McKay 16:51, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: I removed the section "Running the game on a modern PC", which contained just generic info that had no special relevance for this game.
I also removed the External links section, since none of the links fulfilled the conditions of WP:EL. There was a link to the file (WP:NOT), a link to DOSBox, and to a JavaScript remake that isn't even finished yet. — Graf Bobby 05:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed sections 

message: Regarding the removal of history section. I see user Mckaysalisbury reverted the history I added due to WP:OR although this isn't original research - I received an email from the author, Dan Baker (which I was skeptical to, knowing there's no way to fully prove he is really him). I asked him to prove his identity, which he did by replying to my email (I would have to ask for his permission to provide this email thread copied to this Talk page) and telling me his story, which I consider plausible. Why would anyone go to this length to fake an identity when there's no money involved, and the background (he provided some company background) checks out. Normally I would agree, there's no room for OR in an encyclopedia. However, there should be room for historical facts if they are proven to be correct. What proof will suffice? I'll email him again and ask about posting the thread anyway. Cyborg 18:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm reverting as per the reasons you specified. For a more full treatment on the subject, read WP:RS, WP:A, and WP:OR. McKay 20:14, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

text: While I think this is totally cool, and probably true, the fact of the matter is that the information presented is WP:OR, and doesn't qualify as a WP:RS. If you think it does, please read those articles and quote relevant policy saying that the information should be included. In order for this kind of thing to be included in Wikipedia, it needs to be covered by a "reliable source". I work for a local magazine, and due to the information presented by him through you, I think that the two of us (DanB and I) might be close enough for a personal meeting. I'd love to write an article about him. I'm not sure how my editor would feel about such an article, so it might just get blogged. Would you mind sending me his email address so I can contact him about such an interview or something. Now I could write an article, and it might get published, and it might be considered reliable, but then sourcing it in Wikpiedia might be a little of a WP:COI, but I think it's the best course of action (and I'd like to meet him anyway :D) McKay 06:37, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: You can email me via the "E-mail this user" link in the toolbox on my user page or talk page. McKay 14:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I received emails from a user a couple weeks ago. mckay checks his settings Sure enough, it was turned off. It's turned back on now. Send away! McKay 15:43, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Yup, I got it, and i've been emailing him. He lives in the same city as I do :D McKay 17:18, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

text: It's a local magazine aimed at college students. And because of the summer, they're not printing issues. We actually work within a mile of each other :D. Also, my boss used to work with him at a different company, and my boss has met him. What a small world. McKay 14:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

text: No, there will be an interview, I just don't know how or when it will be published. McKay 17:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revert of history not OR 

message: :Image:Beast Eggs.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:23, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I responded on the discussion page of the image. McKay 15:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Beast Eggs.png

message: :Image:Beast ASCII Game.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Beast ASCII Game.png

message: :Image:Beast Crush A.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Beast Crush A.png

message: :Image:Beast Crush B.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Beast Crush B.png

message: :Image:Beast Crush C.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Beast Crush C.png

message: The article mentions it's possible to bury monsters, instead of crush them, but does not explain what that means. Can it be clarified?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salty-horse (talk • contribs) 12:08, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burial?