lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Elin Ek (actress)

message: this is not a deletion page:i dont agree with this deletion. i think its isotope just using hes power becuase i like it. he has doen this so many times before but he enver comes with any constructive critisism... only deletion.andas i have sayed before he gets involved with articles and subject she doesnt even know anything about.so i dont agree with this deletion.
//matrix17
:Please come down from your high horses, Matrix. Your debating technique leaves a lot to wish for and by blaming isotope for having an agenda instead of what he's really doing - looking out for the quality of Wikipedia - it's difficult to even consider helping you in making sure the articles are sourced correctly and up to quality standards you can expect of articles in Wikipedia. When I helped you with keeping Addis Black Widow you started rambling about China  and even dragging poor old Godwin into the discussion. Tune down your approach a bit and focus on quality instead of quantity when adding material to WP. --Strangnet 18:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Strangnet has it exactly right.  I have no agenda here other than to ensure that Wikipedia is full of high quality articles that correctly demonstrate the importance of the subject matter.  I'll continue this on your talk page.--Isotope23 20:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: February 2007 deletion discussion
Talk:Riverside Restaurant

message: I did not intend for this page to be viewed like an advert. The restaurant is part of the culture in West Bay (England) as it provides a local top-class service for the local area, and like it says has been voted in the top 10 of seafood restaurants by The Observer. Please advise what I can change to make it more like a historical piece and not delete it. Thanks Timclare (talk) (sign here) 17:17, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While I did not tag the article, I would agree with the original tagger that the article does not assert notability nor does it provide reliable third-party sources to establish notability even if it is notable. --Farix (Talk) 17:27, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added more references, please consider this as acceptable to not delete the article and if anyone would like to help tidy the article, help is much appreciated. Let me know anything else I can do. Thanks Timclare (talk) (sign here) 18:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tagged it, but it looks a lot better now.  Betaeleven 20:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Betaleven. I will endeavor to get more information from local sources and update the page more in the near future.Timclare (talk) (sign here) 21:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:Cyclin-dependent kinase

message: Consider adding the Phase associated with a cyclin-Cdk complex:
Phase	Cyclin	Cdk
G1   	D, E  	CDK4, CDK2
S    	A     	CDK2
M    	B     	CDK1
Rage italic 17:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, this isn't entirely correct: Cdk1 is sufficient to drive the mammalian cell cycle. 157.193.141.24 (talk) 14:13, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyclin and Cdk used in Cell Cycle 

message: I just heard somebody say "... CDKs, or cell division kinases ...".  Are they talking crap / getting confused with the cdcs, or is it an acceptable term?  I had only ever heard it expanded to Cyclin-dependent kinase before now, but there an awful lot of Google results for this other one.  Joe D (t) 10:29, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cell division kinase

message: The Medical significance section overlaps CDK inhibitor so propose that most of the section here be merged into that article with a summary left here. - Rod57 (talk) 23:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed shift of content from Medical significance
Talk:Schlenk line

message: I've just added that it's a piece of chem apparatus- I think that the opening line/para should introduce what it is and what it's used for immediately, and then expand upon that later.
There could also be a note somewhere that this bit of kit is pivotal to several areas of chemistry (well, I think it is, I'd be lost without it), but I don't have a ref for this- does anyone else? Freestyle-69 (talk) 02:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Good edit, it is very easy to omit the "obvious".  I also happen to agree with you that the old schlenk line is pivotal in many areas of chemistry. Be Bold, make the edit, if people hate your edit, you'll find out soon enough when it gets reverted. Sadly, I don't have a reference either. Quantockgoblin (talk) 02:55, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Still not keen on putting in something without a reference (old habits die hard...) even though many people would know that it's obvious. BTW I stuck a hyphen in "high-vacuum pump" just so it's clear that it's a vacuum pump that sucks real hard, not a stoned vacuum pump. The later phrase of "high vacuum" doesn't need this clarification. Freestyle-69 (talk) 06:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: First para
Talk:Systems Engineering Laboratories

message: The SEL 840 was used in the Lockheed C-5A Simulators where there was 1 at Dover, 2 at Altus and 2 at Travis Air Force Bases.   Originally made by Curtis-Wright, maintenance and updating was taken over by Lockheed-Georgia Co. in Marietta, GA during the 1970's.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.179.95.95 (talk) 00:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I worked at plant one (special products division), plant two (special products division), plant seven (special products division) and advanced development (software engineer) from 1980 to 1988. I set up the testing area in the Malborne plant before it went online and I was part of "The Breakfast Club" which was the massive layoff in advanced development in 1988. Good times! Dlehr2002 (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SEL Computers
Talk:The Incredible Journey

message: I vaguely remember when I was in 5th grade we were given a choice of about 2 or 3 different books to read, this being among them. What I am certain about is, the teacher having read into it, determined the book too difficult for 11 year olds and pulled us aside. (I also remember loving it). Hogdotmac (talk) 00:39, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Children's Literature

message: 👴 184.167.154.185 (talk) 04:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page is a dumb fuck👁👄👁
Talk:Beavis and Butt-Head/Archive 2

message: First, the section is very lacking in terms of sourcing, with neither of the controversial incidents being sourced. Second, listing a bunch of jokes relating to fire as jabs to a specific controversy seems pretty POV/OR since fascination with fire and explosions is more likely a character trait than a continuing response to criticism. I'm going to prune lots of them since in addition to the POV/OR problems they really break up the flow of the article. --TM 18:54, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy Section "Jabs"

message: Saying it's a "rumor" to me seems to be just a way justify putting one's speculation in here. Some will argue that they really have nothing in common other than having blond hair and being pudgy. I requested a citation.
:It doesn't get much more speculative than "it is rumoured". I removed the line since a supporting citation, even of the existence of a rumour regardless of its veracity, seems very unlikely. --TM 09:15, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stewart/Bobby Hill 

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: In one episode, Butt-Head claimed that the video to Aerosmith's "Rag Doll" was the "Best video ever". 惑乱 分からん 16:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  RagDoll 

message: The article says "TP for me bumhole", but I've always believed it to be "TP for me bunghole"...anyone know for certain?  -Grammaticus Repairo 06:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's "bunghole." DanTD 19:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cornholio's Catchphrase
Template talk:Snooker world rankings

message: Please discuss the use of invisible span statements for indentation here, rather than engaging in an edit war.  I personally think they are entirely unnecessary, and are entirely browser dependent.  On my web browser the lines don't align and wrap to two lines per decade.  I think we should just remove this extraneous formatting and allow the browser to naturally determine where to wrap the lines.  Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:36, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the formatting of the template is just fine, is uses the same 10 page grouping per row as every other snooker tournament templates. Don't remove the hidden elements without consensus. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 19:40, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  You have now violated WP:3RR.  Do I need to request a block? I strongly suggest you undo your latest revert. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I strongly suggest, that after that you do the same. There is no consensus for your changes. You should have started a discussion after you were first reverted and not making change again. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 19:53, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  There are two editors here who disagree with you.  I will ask for an uninvolved admin to review the 3RR violation. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 20:01, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Would this be an acceptable compromise? Do you have a 800x600 resolution monitor? ("wrap to two lines per decade") Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 20:14, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formating 

message: Why are we using "2011/12" for the link in the first group, but "2011/2012" in the second.  It would seem they should be the same? Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:38, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I forgot to change it. Now done. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 19:40, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011/12 vs. 2011/2012
Template talk:User WikiProject Snooker

message: I've merged all three versions of this template into one, with an image, and keeping the yellow (why?) of the original. I can't think of any reason that one projects needs three infoboxen. — SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 10:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Was a good idea. Cheers. =) Armbrust (talk) 19:27, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged template
Talk:Paceville

message: Do we really need to list all the venues in Paceville? It smells more like advertising to me... ~  ► Wykebjs ◄  (userpage | talk) 17:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I thought about that. I don't know. I think it's either all of them or none of them. Marcus1234 18:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I posted the question to WikiProject Spam, and the consensus was to kill the list entirely. WP:NOT does clearly say that these kind of lists are unacceptable. ~  ► Wykebjs ◄  (userpage | talk) 20:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of venues
Talk:Kaimkhani

message: hi... my name is Shahzeeb Jaffer Kaim Khani ... belongs to TandoAllahyar.... i must say that this site really enhanced my knowledge ... n i m really happy to know about my caste through this site.... the author has done a really awesome job  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.135.24.173 (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  my comments about tha link
Talk:Dean–Stark apparatus

message: Dean, E.W.; Stark, D.D., Ind. Eng. Chem. 1920, 12, 486 --Stone (talk) 19:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Inventor
Talk:Deoxygenation

message: I was wondering if this would be an appropriate place to put a small blurb on separating carbon and oxygen from co2. It seems appropriate to me, unless there's another page for it.
If someone would be so kind as to put that in this article, or at the see also section, I am sure it will help a lot of people.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.22.176.33 (talk) 22:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  carbon dioxide separation ?
Template talk:Nunavut

message: Add Alert?--Sonjaaa 18:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say no because it's not really a community as seen by the GNU. Have a look at [[[List of communities in Nunavut]]. I suppose that there could be a seperate section for military bases but then why not DEW line sites. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 09:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: alert
Talk:Schlenk flask

message: I have re-drawn the png as an svg.  I hope that what I interpreted as hose tails are, in fact, hose tails. --Slashme 13:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  SVG 

message: Colloquially NMR tubes sealed with a Teflon tap as shown left are called “Schlenk NMR tube”. Can anyone confirm if these are true Schlenk tubes?  Perhaps it doesn’t matter - if they are known as such, they should be added?
Also it would be nice to have an image of the various types flasks that are described in the section about these types of flask. Better would be photos (anyone got a few of these types of Schlenk flask knocking about in the lab?) -- Quantockgoblin (talk) 17:27, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that there should be a section about Schlenk NMR tube also known as J-young tubes, named after the the teflon cap with the t-junction whose major brand name is J.young valve.  J-young has been adopted similar to roller blades and kleenex and is used in academic publications.--OMCV (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of Schlenk tubes 

message: None 122.53.254.222 (talk) 15:05, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  SCHLENK FLASK AND STRAUS FLASK
Talk:Piet Kee

message: This article was mentioned in The American Organist magazine, August 2007.  Is there a special template for something like that? --W0lfie 13:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: TAO mention

message: Where have they gone? Why is the index dumped on the left hand side? This is very sad, indeed! 213.236.222.243 (talk) 19:56, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Print-button and interwikis
Talk:Prince associates

message: While I understand mentioning established musical artists that he has contributed extensively to. Carmen Electra should be mentioned on some Prince page somewhere. If he had not signed her to his label she would never have been notable. Shouldn't there be some segment that talks about artists he has signed? Whether or not they succeeded in the field would seem arbitrary in an article or sub-page about Prince and his activities.--Wowaconia 18:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carmen Electra? 

message: There are two contradictory entries for this person. I don't know which one is correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.170.135.7 (talk) 00:28, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dez Dickerson 

message: How this chart is laid out is confusing.  It should probably be two different sections.  "Former and present band members" and "associated acts".  Right now it makes it seem like the two are associated in some way as they appear in the same rows. Centerone (talk) 15:31, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Going to take a stab at converting this to a better table. Made a copy in my sandbox: User:Steveprutz/princeassoc. StevePrutz (talk) 18:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. Copied to this article today. StevePrutz (talk) 04:21, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Still needs alphabetization, citation, and general improvement. StevePrutz (talk) 14:16, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart layout confusing 

message: A list of people to add to the list eventually.
Please add Shelby J, Ida Nielson, Renato (keyboards), Liv Warfield... All on welcome2America 2011 tour. 
* John Blackwell, Jr.
* Boni Boyer
* Sue Ann Carwell
* Susan Moonsie
* Nona Gaye
* Chick Huntsberry
* David Henry Hwang
* Kirk Johnson
* Hans Martin Buff
* Parris Patton
* Wally Safford
* Rhonda Smith
* Atlanta Bliss
* Taya Sevelle
* Gayle Chapman
* Chris Moon
* Paula Abdul ("U")
* Sinead O'Connor ("Nothing Compares 2 U")  — Preceding unsigned comment added by La Maupin (talk • contribs) 13:47, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing associates
Talk:Ghosts of the Sargasso

message: Wow, this article needs a major rewrite.  See WP:V, WP:RS, WP:WAF, WP:AVTRIV, and WP:EPISODE for the many ways to improve this article.  Cheers. L0b0t 18:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As much as the trivia sections in all of the VB episode articles need to be cleaned up, removing them only a few hours after slapping a > on everything is wrong. Also, try to tackle the related articles with larger trivia sections that have more indiscriminate and guesswork trivia first, as they pose a bigger distraction. Right now serious cleanup is better than removeal. See also various Futurama episodes, various Family Guy episodes, etc. -th1rt3en 18:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup 
Talk:List of Aqua Teen Hunger Force villains

message: I think that we should simply move the page to List of Aqua Teen Hunger Force villains instead of doing some kind of merge, and adding the villains on the minor characters article to it? :: ZJH (T C E) 20:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move (instead of merge) 

message: I thought Carl's dog (The Enforcer) wanted his name to be Spaghetti, not Twizzler...
:It is. Someone keeps changing it to Twizzler. :: ZJH (T C E) 23:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Twizzler?

message: I rephrased some of the description concerning the Mr. Wongburger character. I felt the frequent use of the word "dick" was slightly inappropriate, even if the character is a large penis. :o) SkittlzAnKomboz 21:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr. Wongburger 

message: Rather than being named after two men, it is much more likely that the two were named after Oglethorpe University and Emory University, which are both Atlanta-area universities (Williams Street Studios being based in Atlanta). Thunderbunny 14:52, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oglethorpe and Emory 

message: Is this really relevant for this kind of show? The main characters repeatedly die in many episodes, I doubt any of the characters listed as dead are any more dead than Carl. 66.151.205.13 19:04, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Characters have even been ran over/burned and returned in the middle of the episode/movie without it being mentiong. It's not needed, and the only characters it's worth mentioning for are Jiggle Billy and Willie Nelson because there is some consistency regarding their status. --Jopasopa 00:14, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status Alive/Dead 

message: Should he be referred to as a villian? He dosn't threathen the aqua teens.
:He does show up as a member of Monday Tuesday Wednesday etc., but yeah, he never really does threaten the Aqua Teens.  He was created to be an opponent, though..  And he's not really a friend of the Aqua Teens, and he's only been in two episodes..  I'd say 'villains' works, even if it doesn't completely fit MGlosenger 04:36, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Shake 

message: HShould he be considered a vilain? He was in Monday Tuesday etc... but he thought it was a baby shower. He also saved Shake from being hit by a truck.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grayjack (talk • contribs) 22:37, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ol' Drippy 

message: Why did we bring this article back? There isn't enough real-world information to support it. Kamek (Koopa wizard!) 18:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Character list
Talk:Jacopo della Quercia

message: "Jacopo <BORN c. 1374>, together with Arnolfo di Cambio <who DIED c. 1300-1310>, assisted Nicola Pisano <who DIED in c. 1284> in... 
Excuse me - WHAT...?!
:You're right. Jacopo della Quercia, a Sienese,had seen the marvelous work of Nicola Pisano (and Arnolfo di Cambio) on the pulpit of the Siena cathedral. Later in his career, he worked together with Donatello and Lorenzo Ghiberti on the font in the baptistery of the cathedral. My documentation on the Siena cathedral also says that Jacopo della Quercia, was the only one of the three who had already worked in the cathedral at the very beginning of his career. The marble Madonna at the top of the Piccolomini altar is dated 1397-1400 and may have been Jacopo's earliest work. JoJan 14:21, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Back to the future?!
Talk:John B. Trevor Sr.

message: The guy has a NYT obit and had a published reference asserting notability when db'd. You wanna AfD this, go for it. This does not meet db criteria. Jokestress 18:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletionists

message: I removed a recently re-added quotation cited to the National Republic, which appears to have been an advocacy magazine self-published (WP:SPS) by a figure connected to the subject of this article, not an independent WP:RS. For WP:DUEWEIGHT in this article, an independent RS would need to mention the quotation. WP:SOURCETYPES provides a list of some preferred sources. Llll5032 (talk) 04:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: National Republic was published by Walter S Steele.  I'm not sure what "self-published" means, but the National Republic was widely distributed for many years, and in any case was not connected with John B Trevor. What makes National Republic an "unreliable source?"  The statement by Rollin Browne that you removed is admittedly an opinion, but no more so than that of Louis Adamic ("America's alien-bater No. 1"). I thought Wikipedia encouraged both pro and con material in biographies. I'd like to restore the quote with your permission.  Here is a link to the source: https://archive.org/details/sim_national-republic_1957-03_44_11/page/n1/mode/2up Sandytrevor (talk) 18:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Reliable sources have , and often are academic and peer-reviewed. That description does not appear to describe National Republic, whose publisher's testimony was described as "possibly the most irresponsible ever presented" to the House Un-American Activities Committee. You could ask at WP:RSN if you disagree. Llll5032 (talk) 19:16, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it, thanks. I see why National Review may not meet Wikipedia standard for "reliable source." But that should not invalidate the article by Rollin Browne, which provides useful background on the false claim by Ralph McGill that damaged J B Trevor's reputation, and was later retracted on the front page of the Atlanta Constitution.  There are several books today that contain the false claim so it is important that the actual facts be available in Wikipedia. And it is only fair to include an article that shows that not everyone had as negative opinion of J B Trevor as Adamic, right? Sandytrevor (talk) 20:00, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be included if cited to an independent reliable source (not the National Republic), proportionate to how it is described in that reliable source. But sources without a reputation for accuracy are generally not used. Llll5032 (talk) 20:09, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  National Republic
File talk:Killerbees ani.gif

message: The image is badly outdated, as per the article that refers to it.  It's also misspelled.
:Haha, I was struck by the odd spelling myself.  The source is still misspelled.  Or is that mispelled?  I have downloaded the animation and I am trying to fix it.  I am also setting it to loop, since by the time one reaches it in the text, the "show" is over.  Also speeding it up slightly (1/2 sec per frame instead of 1 sec).  If I succeed in fixing it I will upload the "new" version. Huw Powell 01:29, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done (by the way, the source still only runs through 2003) Huw Powell 02:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)