lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:32-bit x86 assembly programming

message: Could someone please rewrite the paragraph that reads:
	The lower 16 bits of each 32 bit register can be addressed separately and like a register in
	its own right, and the low 16 bits of the first four registers (EAX, EBX, ECX, EDX) can be
	further broken up into two eight-bit registers. The 16 bits of data in these first four 16
	bit registers can be addressed 8 bits at a time: the upper eight and the lower eight bits,
	and can be treated as registers in their own right.
The second sentence in very confusing in light of the first.
--85.197.227.231 12:54, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why are test registers listed here?  These are not part of the official x86 architecture and as far as I can tell only existed in the 486 era processors.  Also, not all flags in EFLAGS are 1-bit...IOPL is 2-bits.  David.kaplan 04:06, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Test registers
Talk:Felix Potvin

message: I started working on this, saved it on temp subpage
Kewp 05:48, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I know it's a bad pun, (Curiousity, killed the Cat). Anyway, Felix Potvin isn't listed with the Bruins anymore. Where is he? shouldn't we mention his current whereabouts in the article. GoodDay 22:50, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: HockeyDB says that Potvin hasn't played anywhere since 2004, but yet I have not heard an official retirement from him. So I would say his currently he is more or less unemployed. Croat Canuck 02:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Curiousity, where's the Cat
Talk:Symbols of leadership

message: I see a problem with presidential symbols being a unique topic.  Why are presidential symbols unique to the symbols of a prime minister or dictator? Tfine80 06:40, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I am just filling a request at WP:RA. Of course, since this is a Wiki, we can move the article. What title do you wish this article can be under? Zscout370 (Sound Off) 06:42, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Symbols of leadership? Zscout370 (Sound Off) 06:46, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Problems

message: The whole article is heavily biased to criticise the use of symbolism within an environment.  I can attempt to resolve that, but for the moment it is POV.ALR 21:33, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: I'm working on a redevelopment but at the moment there is a lot of repetition within the article.  I'll move it to a sandbox to re-structure.  It's probably better to talk about how various elements act as symbols, then articulate their use in various situations.ALR 19:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Development
Talk:Anarchism in the United States

message: Anarcho-capitalism isn’t included in an entry that misleads readers into thinking that it is a general coverage of anarchism in the US. If the entry’s purpose is to only discuss particular ideological tendencies, this should be reflected in the title. Jaqo (talk) 11:54, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incompleteness 

message: ???. Nonsense! They, the anarchists,built the American Labor movement. At the time anarchism might have been 1/3 of popular politics. That’s not to say everyone identified as anarchists per se, but the beautiful ideas are undeniably anarchistic.Both anarchism and ‘labor’
died from state repression and murder. 2601:801:400:9430:B010:9426:4F63:C96C (talk) 12:36, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was the American labor movement before anarcho-syndicalism? 

message: Moving unsourced text here in case someone has a secondary source to use:
: In the 1980s anarchism became linked with squatting and social centers such as ABC No Rio and C-Squat in New York City. The Institute for Anarchist Studies is a non-profit organization founded by Chuck W. Morse following the anarchist-communist school of thought, in 1996 to assist anarchist writers and further develop the theoretical aspects of the anarchist movement.
czar 03:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced
Talk:Phenylpiracetam

message: -- The data in the pharmacology section calling phenylpiracetam a NDRI is dubious at best. The patent claiming increases in dopamine levels based on ONE chart has massive error bars on the data points which all conveniently lack a bottom bar. The abstracted cited for NET inhibition does not state anything regarding norepinephrine unless it's discussed somewhere within the article. -June 2018
--One CNN article noted, has a dead link. Cannot be found Google searching with reference to it.
-- Agreed. The section on pharmacology makes sweeping claims about the action of phenylpiracetam without providing any citations or other evidence. The entire page reads like an advertisement for the product. I deleted links to suppliers that included PRICING information! - Oceanlab  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oceanlab (talk • contribs) 19:50, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Add citations where you know that reliable ones exist. Challenge uncited material with the cite tag "", then after some time passes, other editors may provide citations, or the challenged material may be removed. Since you have the ability to edit the article, just complaining about citation or lack thereof isn't really helpful. Links to suppliers are generally not appropriate, so thank you for making those changes.Anastrophe (talk) 19:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone removed a large chunk of the pharmocology section explaining it's mode of action, which was covered by a valid journal citation (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1134%2FS1819712411020048). The change leaves the pharmocology section pointless, as it contains no information regarding the actual pharmacology of the drug now. The chunk explaining the effect on receptors should remain as it has a valid citation, though I agree the chunk claiming it's uses in asthenia and cerebrovascular injury require better citations and thus should remain removed until better sources can be found (I'll try and look later). LiamSP (talk) 23:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations needed

message: This text was apparently translated via babelfish from the German wikipedia.  It must be re-translated by hand.
Athf1234 07:05, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Need to re-translate

message: According to the wikipedia article naming policy,
"Most notably: Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's 'official' name as an article title; it generally prefers to use the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names
The recent change to this article's title abandoned a commonly used name to use a more "official" name, which nobody uses and nobody has heard of. Check the number of google search results if you want to see the huge magnitude of this difference.
Piojo (talk) 06:49, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: Sure there must be some side effects?--Hiveir (talk) 20:23, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Side effects section missing
Talk:Historic Core, Los Angeles

message: ==Move discussion in progress==
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Harbor City, Los Angeles, California which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:31, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Interested editors can also comment at Talk:Los Angeles Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 22:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

message: Can we please get some Reliable sources cited in this article? Thank you. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 06:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:List of religious leaders in 2005

message: I really don't think that the full string of pope's titles should be included in this list. It does't appear in any other listing and, in my opinion, it is completely unnecessary and it makes the list a mess. They deserve a mention in the pope article, but not here; "John Paul II, Pope" is enough. - Mike Rosoft 23:19, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Titles of the pope

message: I added some non-Christian leaders to give more variety. In some cases how much they actually "lead" their respective religions seems unclear to me. I recently added "new religions" due to controversies over the "list of controversial religious leaders." I might drop that element, or radically reduce it, if it is offensive.--T. Anthony 01:26, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I decided to reduce the list of leaders of new religions on my own initiative. The remaining lead religions that are new, but large enough to be significant. Or that appear to be small, but appear to be harmless.--T. Anthony 01:31, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay I may have gone overboard. I hope it's not too big now as there's everything from the Shakers to Tendai Buddhism or from the surviving few hundred ancient Samaritans to several rising and new religions. It's been fun trying to find if some of these religions even have leaders, in any sense, but I think I've done enough. Hopefully my obsessiveness will abate as I think this is a fairly complete list. Although if your denomination is still unrepresented, you can now feel free to not worry about me obsessively putting on some obscure group instead--T. Anthony 10:42, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct that I forgot the Druze. I imagine there are some Shiite and Protestant leaders I missed too, but I think I'll add the Druze guy and stop. Well hopefully.--T. Anthony 10:50, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Christian content
Talk:Trapinch

message: I will have to note that it is not very likely an ant, but more likely an Antlion. Additionally, I'll note that Run Away, unlike the Flying type or the Levitate ability, does not allow the Pokemon in play to switch - it simply allows the player to run away successfully from a wild Pokemon with Arena Trap, which has no use in competitive battling. --24.69.255.205 07:18, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:L.A.M.F.

message: From my POV it should be Punk.  Ultimately it is all Rock 'N' Roll with Punk rock as a subgenre of the whole thing - should it be Rock music anyway as the Rock 'N' Roll article is specifically about the 1950's style?  This recording dates from, is rooted in, and was culturally included within, the Punk era and ethos.   If we follow the arguments raised here we should reclassify Sid Vicious as a Crooner because he did My Way but then he did C'mon Everybody too so it might just be some kind of categorisation swindle. Lame Name (talk) 09:11, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre  

message: Should the Nina Antonia quote specify it was on the albums reissue or was it on the original issue too?
Should the Mother Fucker part of the title be linked like here? Lame Name (talk) 09:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Points
Talk:Civic Center, Los Angeles

message: Maybe a redirect to the Los Angeles Sports and Entertainment District? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.231.149.37  (talk • contribs) 03:25, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
The civic center is NOT the section previously described here; that is called South Park or Central City. Civic Center is the area in Los Angeles around City Hall. I have updated this article accordingly, writing a new article from the ground up. Catsonmars 20:54, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect?

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bunker Hill, Los Angeles which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 19:30, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Interested editors can also comment at Talk:Los Angeles Purplebackpack89 (Notes Taken) (Locker) 03:50, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Touched (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

message: I removed the copyright violating expanded overview: blow by blow details are FORBIDDEN, people. The summary left isn't perfect, I know. But better then the expanded... I also removed the extensive quotes, I simply don't understand why we need them, when we already -have- a Wikiquotes website. Lots42 (talk) 14:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What I Changed
Talk:Cramp

message: The intro paragraph is a bit of a mess. 
You know all those stories where people look up a symptom and get the worst possibilities first? I think it would do a lot of good to put the common causes at the top and the rarest at the bottom. At the very least, motor neuron disorders should not be above electrolyte imbalance. 
// [NomadicVoxel] [talk\ctbs]  20:33, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hoofbeats? Assume horses, not zebras. 

message: I've made some investigation to the sources. As I think most sources describe skeletal muscle cramps under the name "cramps" or "muscle cramps". Here's one source that says it directly: 
Also sometimes cramps are called as "true muscle cramps" to distinguish it from other conditions. I think that the title "skeletal muscle cramps" would be more appropriate name to the article about cramps. And I found no sources that generalise soft muscle cramps and skeletal muscle cramps with exception of Britannica artcicle. But Britannica has many errors so I can't rely only on that source. So I doubt if combining those conditions is original research or not. D6194c-1cc (talk) 10:54, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think per WP:COMMONNAME the current title is correct. Alexbrn (talk) 14:37, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "Cramp" name is often used in reliable sources, but it is also ambiguous. Menstrual cramps are named cramps, but are not skeletal muscle cramps. Those cramps are reviewed separately from each other in reliable sources. D6194c-1cc (talk) 16:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Given that Wikipedia articles are based on a coherent topic treated as such by reliable sources, rather than a specific term, I agree with the proposal to base the article around a distinct topic rather than the common use of the word "cramp". (t · c) buidhe 00:46, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skeletal muscle cramps 

message: Charley horse seems to be a colloquialism in some countries for a muscle cramp, usually in the leg. So, following an initial discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#Charley horse, I suggest that we merge Charley horse as a section on Cramp for reasons of context, overlap and short text. Lets continue the discussion here. Klbrain (talk) 08:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: The lead pictures doesn't really seem appropriate. What does it have to do with cramps? Tad Lincoln (talk) 05:18, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Gone.  Velella  Velella Talk   09:39, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Shouldn't this article have a section on the cramps that women specifically feel?Inkan1969 (talk) 22:10, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Feminine Cramps?
Talk:Public Opinion (book)

message: # I have no "issues" with Phrost, nor is that why I edit articles.  I made these changes because of Wikipedia policy and English style and euphony.
#The final sentence is a bit obscure.  What exactly is it to "mirror" some else's writings?  Does Lippmann use Nietzsche, or follow him, or is he influenced by him? --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 07:46, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does this article open up with a quote from the book? It looks really awkward.Memeligutsa (talk) 13:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

message: Might someone have time and interest to add more page references?  I've added a few that I know about, but I'm not eager to study the entire book searching for the other apparent quotes. 
Also, I replaced the citation to the copy on archive.org to the entry on Wikidata.  I did this for multiple reasons.  Primarily, I've found Wikidata items like this to be more work initially but much more preferable if more than one Wikimedia Foundation project article uses the same source.  It's easier to maintain against link rot.  And all the citations to a Wikidata item from within Wikimedia Foundation projects can be found from that Wikidata item.  That can be useful for some purposes.  In addition, in this case, p. # 162 (p. 175/449) on archive.org is complete blurred and unreadable.  DavidMCEddy (talk) 13:40, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  page citations and ... 

message: Did Lippmann actually use the phrase "little intellectual engagement" to describe how "certain members of society ... attend to life"?  
I can believe he may have.  He did seem to be an elitist.  However, it would be useful to have a page citation.  
Decades ago, I heard many people making comments roughly like that.  I made them myself, until I heard some of the dumbest people I knew make such statements.  
This phrase is ultimately insulting.  The phenomenon is described by the research for which Daniel Kahneman won the 2002 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences.  I plan to add mention of that to this article.  
I believe this article would be more useful if it had a page citation for where Lippmann used the phrase, "certain members of society who attend to life with little intellectual engagement."  If he did NOT use that phrase, then the verbiage should be modified to be less offensive, I think.  
Thanks to all who have helped to make this important article as good as it is.  DavidMCEddy (talk) 13:52, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  people with little intellectual engagement
Talk:Austin station (MTR)

message: I disagree with the CSD notice. West Kowloon appears to be a proposed railroad station on a railway line (called West Rail) in Hong Kong; Hong Kong Housing, Planning and Lands Bureau Q&A page, Legislative Council Panel Information Report (pdf), including exact location. Since I don't know any Chinese, I can't find all that much info on it, but it seems notable. --Mairi 07:47, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was actually a plan to extend the East Rail to Austin Station, and this station would feature two pairs of island platform (an extra pair of 12-car platform for the East Rail). The proposal was ruled out in favour of the current interchange arrangement at Hung Hom. 119.236.251.39 (talk) 22:05, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interchange 
Talk:Antonio Martorell

message: I corrected the article for style, added some information (for example, that he is a Georgetown University graduate), added a section with the titles of his publications, added a reference, and added an external link.--Mgdelarosa (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Edited and Expanded Article
Talk:Rice v. Cayetano

message: Starting a new version of the article on the temp page.  KeithH 08:04, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article uses words such as "Indian" and "American Indian" in the history, petitioner's case, respondent's case, the majority and dissenting opinions, and the reaction to the opinions. Are those really the words used by the petitioner, respondent, justices, and people who are reacting in a legal fashion to this case? JohnWycliff (talk) 16:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Use of the word Indian

message: The article also comments on the Petitioner's Argument while discussing it; in particular to clarify its implicit intent. For instance, analogies to Nuremberg laws may evoke anti-Nazi sentiments but these may not have been the Petitioner's intent-- indeed, the intent may be simply to show that similar laws were not enacted in the United States, and the only popularly known Laws that did so were those by the Nazis.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.60.91.105 (talk) 18:40, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Commentary on Petitioner's Argument

message: The article implies (without citations!) that the plaintiff was related to William Harrison Rice which would of course need to be verified. But there are a couple articles on them now. W Nowicki (talk) 02:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Relations?

message: Come on, guys. A whole paragraph claiming to explain Hawaiian history without a single source? What is this? Sparksflame (talk) 02:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massively biased and poorly sourced
Talk:Cultural norm

message: While we're working on the POV & Fact issues, we can also clean it up so it's styled/formatted properly.  The text itself also leaves a lot to be desired.  I'm seeing misuse of commas, auxillary verbs left out, incomplete sentences, and other such problems.
Factual Issues:
1) I'm not seeing what makes this particularly distinct from norm (sociology).  Why shouldn't whatever's worthwhile in this article be merged?  Admittedly, sociology and anthropology are not fields I'm well-educated in.
2) Is it true that Ayn Rand was a pioneer in objecting to cultural norms?  Is she relevant to this article?
3) This reads to me like an original research essay, not even an original research article.  Could we get citations for some of this?  References?  
4) Can someone who knows what this article's trying to describe put in something that will clarify what a cultural norm is?  I can't tell what this article is about.
5) Bush quote needs a date at minimum, external reference (link to a transcript, for instance) would be ideal.  Lots (all?) political figures have quotes attributed to them that they never said or are way out of context; Wikipedia doesn't need to add to that problem.
POV Issues:
1) Isn't in neutral language.  Worst offending sentence?  "The culture norm stills exists, rampant in incessant public polling and ever-churning statistics."  The rest of it's still got sensationalizing diction, though: "seeping" and "finer points" are examples.
2) "But the tides have been turned, in the United States alone democracy, abolition and suffrage have triumphed over prior abhorrence."  See point 1.  Also, serious pro-U.S. bias.  Article as a whole seems ethnocentric, dealing only with the cultural norm in the U.S.
3) Fourth paragraph: because I suspect Ayn Rand is not as relevant to the topic of cultural norms as this paragraph indicates, it strikes me as an NPOV violation (overemphasis of inappropriate expert).
4) The article seems to be making value judgments about cultural norms.  I.E., "Still it cannot be said that culture norms are not a useful tool is assessing foreign entities, or ourselves."
Looking at this, and looking at the article again, I'm wondering why noone's nominated it to wp:vfd.  I halfway think I should have, as I know I would definitely vote to delete this article if I came across it there.  The Literate Engineer 08:22, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The article should be redirected to norm (sociology). In its present form it contains nothing of value. The (unsopported) reference to Rand is completely out of place, as she was never regarded as an expert in the field, besides being factually inaccurate (recorded criticism of social norms dates back to the Greek philosopher Xenophanes, at least). There is nothing in it that needs to be even merged. Taragui 07:59, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: POV & Factuality Dispute
Talk:Elisa Bridges

message: ..... in the case , the current nice one might get copyright troubles. Greetings MutterErde 08:34, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternate pic ....

message: * 1. Who has deleted the Playboy cover and why?
* 2. Who has deleted the Playboy Book Of Lingerie cover and why? 19:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why? 

message: When she was in Playboy, they listed her as being 5'6" and 107 lbs. Her autopsy says 5' and 90 lbs. 66.168.21.2 (talk) 03:25, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a source for the 5'6" and 107 lbs. I don't see any source for your version. Dismas|(talk) 04:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

text: I see that now, thanks. I've changed the stats and changed the reference. Please don't simply remove references in the future. It's better to update them so that other editors know where you're getting your info. Thanks again, Dismas|(talk) 03:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stats