lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ogopogo

message: It appears that recently this article has seen a significant amount of synthesis, introducing sources such as this one that make no mention of the subject of this article. The newly introduced "moose" section also contains sources that make no mention of the subject, for example. All of these sections that use sources that make no mention of the Ogopogo need to be removed. :bloodofox: (talk) 04:15, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: That source is a cite to the statement that otters are "Capable of swimming at up to 6 miles per hour". I moved the moose source to cite the fact the source mentions.--Auric talk 17:46, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: If the source doesn't mention the Ogopogo, this is synthesis. I'm removed all sources that do not mention the article's subject. Please do not add more. :bloodofox: (talk) 23:29, 23 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction of straightforward synthesis ([[WP:SYNTH]]) 

message: The name is not actually ogopogo. It's orgins of that name are from folk song written in the 1920s mocking the indiginious of the region for the spirit of the lake Naitaka. And it is NOT believed to be evil. It's the spirit of the water. It is to protect life and water . 2001:569:FDA5:9700:149A:85E7:7055:D6ED (talk) 20:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ogopogo 

message: Mmmm 2607:9880:1678:CB:F8AF:ADC6:457C:47A7 (talk) 20:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  is this real 

message: I am not sure if this is related but in Loch ness in Scotland United kingdom your animal sounds like the same thing some people also say this creature doesn't exist  maybe all these animals are some how related 86.24.8.222 (talk) 16:11, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This sounds simular to the loch ness monster
Talk:Barry Boehm

message: Different equations for COCOMO can be found at http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?CoCoMo .
Note that people should be very careful about naievly making calculations based on Lines Of Code, it's not really a good productivity measure. See also: Metaprogramming for an example. 80.126.238.189 17:14, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  COCOMO 

message: Shouldn't be reasonable to enter his date/place of birth and photo in the article?
: yes, if we can get a freely available (gfdl or public domain) photo and verifiable info about his birthdate. Please add if you have either of these. best, -- phoebe/(talk)  19:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date and photo? 

message: How is "Boehm" correctly pronounced in English?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.112.0.234 (talk) 15:03, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: This article has his middle initial as W, while at least one linking page lists it as J. Could we get a valid source to confirm one or remove it in both places? ThomasOwens (talk) 17:21, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle Initial Check 
Talk:BBC Three

message: This is not a formal proposal just yet. I'm gathering opinions and ideas so that we can get the BBC Three articles in a position that keeps the historic and future incarnations of it in a coherent order.
Seeing as this article covers a period that ends in 2016 and that the streaming article covers the 2016 - 2022 period and also that the 2022 version of BBC Three looks like a given. I think renaming this article and the streaming article would bring a lot of clarity to things. I'm thinking along the following lines:
* Rename BBC Three (this article) to  BBC Three (2003 - 2016)
* Rename BBC Three (streaming service) to BBC Three (2016 - 2022)
* Make a new BBC Three to either cover the 2022 incarnation or as a disambiguation page. 
All of the above is to bring clarity to the individual and distinct phases of the channel.
Any opinions or alternative ideas? - X201 (talk) 10:59, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to agree with  and say that there should not be a new article for the upcoming BBC Three channel. I agree that it makes no sense when the other channels have one page, but I also want to add that I don't see any issue about an article that represents a channel that closed down and was "relaunched". When it comes to consistency: we in fact already have an example of such a case, Great! TV was formerly called Sony Channel which closed down in 2018 before it was relaunched in 2019. And in cases such as Sky Living and a plethora of other examples, we don't have separate articles for rebrands that are called "relaunches", so the case for having a separate article for a channel that gets relaunched with the same name and identity i.e. BBC Three is even weaker. --Jf81 (talk) 21:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title? 

message: Youve missed Make My Body Younger, the reality show.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joaquin89uy (talk • contribs) 19:38, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. | ComplainingCamel (talk) 16:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make My Body Younger 

message: Following the test broadcasts and the preview loop on Freeview, it is apparent that the colour of BBC Three is now going to be green, as opposed to the pink logo shown as the upcoming logo for BBC Three. I believe the logo should be changed to reflect the new logo colours. ProGamerSrijan (talk) 10:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Should the background not be made black? It would make the contrast much clearer - lime green on white (or off-white) is very hard on the eyes. – Dyolf87 (talk) 21:03, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  BBC Three logo colour
Talk:La Argentina (dancer)

message: If she's better known by her real name than stage name, then put it under her real name.  --zandperl 18:57, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the course of editing the subtitles I have become aware of a largescale possible violation of copyright material. The bulk of the article seems to be a copy-paste from some other source. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:18, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Violation of copyright 
Talk:Thirtysomething (term)

message: This article says no such word has been used in this case on the model of quadragenarian, quinquagenarian, etc. However, a few Internet sites mention "vicenarian" and "tricenarian". Any comments?? Georgia guy 21:23, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Vicenerian is a person in his/her twenties. Tricenarian is a person in his/her thirties. --Tripsy 19:01, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question for some expert please 

message: This article discusses the origin of the term "Twenty something."  Meanwhile, Twenty something metions "Thirty somethings."  Anyone wish to do something about the duplication?  -Sewing - talk 18:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Twenty something

message: I've been referring to my grandparents as "eightysomethings" lately. To heck with "octogenarian"! 204.52.215.14 (talk) 09:50, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: And so on and so forth 

message: I think that the original intention of thirtysomething was not just to describe a group of people united by age, but who shared a particular upbringing; America's post-war glory days, civil rights, women's rights, free love, etc.  Someone who is a "thirtysomething" (or a "twentysomething") is not just an individual, but also part of a huge generation of people sharing similar essential experiences that have shaped attitudes towards politics, individuality, and society.  The term almost seems to make the individual's real age or experience moot; the larger tides affecting the generation as a whole become the emphasis.  Could something like this be included in the article?Delvebelow (talk) 17:25, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Could use some more depth?

message: Per the discussion on Twentysomething (term), I am redirecting this page to Ageing, where it more properly belongs. Discussions of the Baby boom generation are best left to that page, and discussion of how "thirtysomething" entered into the vernacular because of the TV show belongs on the show's page. Vicenarian (talk) 18:35, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to [[Ageing#Dividing the lifespan|Ageing]]
Talk:Twentysomething (term)

message: This is very cliched, and culturally specific. Secretlondon 19:55, Feb 12, 2004 (UTC)
:You could add something about that to the article. KyleGarvey 18:48, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Culture

message: This article discusses the origin of the term "Thirty something."  Meanwhile, Thirty something metions "Twenty somethings."  Anyone wish to do something about the duplication?  -Sewing - talk 18:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thirty something

message: Isn't it twentysomething (one word)? Also, the article, to me, seems really short on culturally significant, anthropological, and/or geographic focus. Can anyone else help with any of that? KyleGarvey 18:48, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, it's one word, and it's not much of an article 67.168.216.176 21:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Expansion and move

message: Looking at the various "-something (term)" pages, it strikes me that, individually, they don't really warrant article status, but if merged they would likely make a decent short article.  I think it would also be more useful to the reader to compare the "-enarian" forms in a table.  Comments?  Objections?  ·  The one thing I'm not sure about is what to use for the target article name.  Age decades is my current working title, but it feels inelegant to me.  Suggestions welcome!  —DragonHawk (talk|hist) 05:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know about your proposed name, but I'm not saying that there's necessarily a better title.  Perhaps these could all be redirected to Ageing?  That was the result, by the way, of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quinquagenarian.  Nyttend (talk) 20:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that these pages should all be merged together, and the idea of using Ageing is sound, since there's already a section on the "somethings" there. Vicenarian (talk) 21:29, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge all the somethings 

message: Unless there is objection, I will begin the process of moving and redirecting these pages into Ageing. Vicenarian (talk) 21:44, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to Ageing
Wikipedia talk:Community Information Directory

message: *I had started something similar a long time ago. See User:Optim/Links and use it if you like it. Optim 00:48, 20 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Optim's Linkies

message: With the new community main page, I think 168's project is no longer needed. We should be able to get everything we need on the new community page, so I propose to redirect there. --Michael Snow 20:12, 26 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirecting to community main page
Talk:Loreto, Marche

message: I'm used to seeing this written as Loretto in English.  Which spelling is right? -- Smerdis of Tlön 20:07, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: loreto. Wetman 20:30, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Biathlon World Championships

message: The following table, emanating from http://www.wintersport.as, lists the highest-ranking nations of the 1958 to 1965 BWCHs, which reportedly consisted of the men's Individual (20 km) contest only. The 1958--1965 Team results table should thus be withheld from the article until certified whether the results represents a Team competition as such (albeit an unofficial one) or the accumulated Individual contest points of each participating nation's biathletes. --Wernher 20:29, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Unofficial Team awards 1958 thru 1965

message: I have made a modified 'flag template' more general in use than the above. The new tpl is  (usage). Barring serious protests, I'll introduce the tpl into the pertinent tables in several articles shortly, to save storage capacity and speed up loading. --Wernher 23:20, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New 'flag template' to be used in tables 

message: An anonymous user (which I will refrain from calling names, however tempting that is) some time ago removed the informational footnotes below each table; see
this version for the one with the notes. As soon as I can manage, I will reinstate the footnotes, possibly using the "bottom of page with return pointers" footnote format if that proves more fitting. --Wernher 02:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Below-table footnotes 

message: In 1986 this source http://www.sports-reference.com/olympics/athletes/an/peter-angerer-1.html explains that Angerer was disqualified from his silver medal place and this ties up with German wikipedia, but it is not correct here so I've changed it, however I can't find many sources to back this up. Tony (talk) 23:46, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Peter Angerer FRG

message: From 2018 to 2022.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by FallandSpringOlympics (talk • contribs) 02:43, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added New Venues 
Talk:Omega constant

message: letter The fact that it is called the omega function makes me think someone mistook the letter ω, a vowel, for the letter w, because of visual similarity.  Is that what happened?  Michael Hardy 20:42, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: "It has properties that are akin to those of the golden ratio, in that 
: e^{-\Omega}=\Omega,\,
or equivalently,
: \ln (1/\Omega) = \Omega."
I'm not sure I can see any similarity to the golden ration here. Should this be obvious? :/ Woscafrench (talk) 01:00, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: One way to express the similarity in exact terms is as follows: if we replace f(x)=e^x with its linear approximation f(x)=x-1 then the solution to the equation f(x)=1/x would be golden ratio.  Grue  15:36, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison to the golden ratio 

message: I used Windows calculator to evaluate the Omega constant. The value of Omega is:
0.56714329040978387299
99686622103555497485
40291138701110223886
36460700559427176005
70163043896301071636
09769866542711127501
81294450722431215290
864337423...
Garygoh884 (talk) 06:27, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Omega constant to larger approximation? 

message: Reference for part "due to Victor Adamchik"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reddwarf2956 (talk • contribs) 22:52, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "due to Victor Adamchik" 

message: Let k = 1/Ω, that is, the reciprocal of the Omega constant. Then it holds that:
:\frac{d}{dx} k^x = k^{x-1}
That is, it imitates the power rule of derivatives (even though it's not a polynomial, but an exponential function with base k) in reducing the exponent by 1. The reciprocal Omega constant is the unique exponential base for which this is true.
Proof:
:\frac{d}{dx} k^x = \frac{d}{dx} e^{x \ln k} = (\ln k)(e^{x \ln k}) = (\ln k)k^x
But since e^{-\Omega} = \Omega, it follows that e^{\Omega} = 1/\Omega = k, and therefore \ln k = \ln e^\Omega = \Omega = 1/k. Substituting into the above equation, we have:
:\frac{d}{dx} k^x = (\ln k)k^x = (1/k)k^x = k^{x-1}
as claimed.—69.172.154.75 (talk) 04:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting property of the Omega constant 

message: I was asking myself if Ω is the the absolute value of the solution to
           
I've found it with the approximative form thanks to the comparison between y=x and y=-e^x.
If I'm not wrong, we can add it to the principal page.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.0.114.210 (talk) 14:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: OEIS Sequences A370490 and A370491 are the denominators and the numerators of an infinite series that converges to the Omega constant.  Dacicus Geometricus (talk) 17:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  OEIS Sequences A370490 and A370491
Talk:The Turner Diaries

message: I've been reading the book "Bring the War Home" by Kathleen Belew, and she notes that Carol Howe, an undercover informant, realised that the Oklahoma City bombing was inspired by the Turner Diaries. Even if it is hate speech, people have gotten copies of this book before the Internet so I don't know what good scrubbing it from the Internet will do. I also don't know if  the author would sue Wikipedia for illegally distributing his banned book. 2603:7000:D03A:5895:5:1D63:6B70:8395 (talk) 22:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: English Wikipedia has no formal connection to Wikisource, except that both are sites under the aegis of the Wikimedia Foundation. You should address your question on Wikisource. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:04, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we add this book to Wikisource?
Talk:List of human blood components

message: Where are the sources for all these values? --User:N/A 15:11, 20 Jul 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources?

message: Wow, who'd a thought!  --Bob Palin 21:21, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Entries

message: Is there any particular reason why there are two widely overlapping lists on this page? One is in a table, the other in a bulleted list. How come? --Diberri | Talk 22:19, May 20, 2004 (UTC)
*It's because the bulleted list doesn't specify if the numbers are for whole blood or plasma/serum and I haven't gotten around to move the last part of the list into the table yet. Fuelbottle | Talk 01:55, 21 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Table and list

message: similarly to hexose phosphate, can anyon ename me the link that says there's glucosamine in human blood? Have not been able to find anything to back it up. --User:N/A 15:11, 20 Jul 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: 1937 article:  - Nunh-huh 14:27, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Glucosamine

message: In some cases, take ethanol for example, there is no 'normal' (background) quantity listed. Natural values should be listed for these too.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.229.123.10 (talk) 08:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No normal

message: Discussion on this topic is found at: Talk:Reference_ranges_for_blood_tests#Merge_List_of_human_blood_components_to_Reference_ranges_for_blood_tests. Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:08, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[List of human blood components]] to [[Reference ranges for blood tests]] 

message: I suggest changing the name to Blood constituents, because the phrase "Blood Components" is used in a very specific connotation, at least in medicine. It means separating whole blood into easily separable components that can be supplied individually as transfusable units eg Packed RBCs, Platelet (or sometimes "platelet concentrate", (somewhat similar but different in application from Platelet-rich plasma which can be either a precursor component of platelet concentrate or a small scale version of platelet concentrate used for local injection) units that come as "random donor" and apheresis , Fresh frozen plasma or FP24. When these major components are further fractionated eg (cryoprecipitate) the first few steps might retain the term components, but on further processing and pooling they lose the stamp of blood component (but blood products of course) eg Human serum albumin, IVIG, etc. Blood component separation is a major subdivision of transfusion medicine. --Dr.saptarshi (talk) 14:51, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Components or constituents ?
Talk:Syrniki

message: A recipe: move to Wikibooks? Jwrosenzweig 21:40, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Not a recipe any longer; stub remains. —Tkinias 07:16, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Fixed romanization and moved article accordingly.  Thanks to Ezhiki for catching my Russian misspelling.  The word's not in my dictionary, and I assumed from the romanization given that it was spelt with an и not an ы.  Since it is an ы, the romanization must be with y, not i, according to all widely-used systems.  (They're not at all the same sound in Russian.) —Tkinias 07:16, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: romanization

message: The dish is popular in Poland and known as "racuchy z serem". "Racuch" is a type of thick pancake with any sweet or savoury filing, including "biały ser" or "twaróg" (lit. "White cheese", "quark") Ralphhalgas (talk) 11:01, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Racuchy (Pol.) 

message: The photo captioned “syrniki with raisins” incorrectly depicts something more resembling oladi rather than syrniki. 75.69.106.96 (talk) 04:25, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading photo
Talk:V10 engine

message: The BMW E60 (model year 2005 and onward) M5 is slated to use a 5 litre V10 engine, owing to lessons learned from BMW's Formula 1 V10 engine program.
Additionally, there are rumours that the mkV Toyota Supra may have a V10 engine as an option.  
When these vehicles are released, this article will need to be edited for correctness, or it will need to be reworked as to not imply that it holds a definitive list of V10 road cars.
:Be bold!  Rather than telling us what needs to be done, how about adding this information?  Wikipedia is not a static repository of information carved in marble; it's dynamic, changeable, editable.  When you see an article that's out of date ... fix it!  And don't be worried about the approval of others -- if they don't like your addition, they'll improve it. —Morven 22:21, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: ... Is:
* the V10 engine from the Porsche Carrera GT;
* the V10 engine from the Lamborghini Gallardo (and its Superleggera spawn);
* the V10 engine from the current (May 2008) Audi RS6.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.8.162.64 (talk) 18:48, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorely missing from this page... 

message: Seriously, what is going on here? This is extremely hard to understand without an engineering background (which I and presumably many other Wiki readers lack). Can someone clarify the balancing/construction of the V10 in this section please? Space Turbo (talk) 23:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mechanicals: WTF? 

message: big trucks are big you can put 10 inch lift on them and you can also put alot more things on them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.209.225.209 (talk) 15:38, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  big trucks 

message: In the old days MAN, MB, Magirus-Deutz and Tatra used v10 Diesel engines. These are the truck manufacters i know about.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.15.135.236 (talk) 03:04, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  V10 truck engines
Talk:Dionysia

message: Shouldn't Euripedes' Bacchae get a mention? Wetman 21:40, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually...I think I misunderstood you. I guess some of the plays should be mentioned specifically, but the Bacchae is not about the Dionysia, if that's what you mean. It's about Maenadism, which is a different form of worship of Dionysus (more like the Roman Bacchanalia). Adam Bishop 15:01, 13 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The lede to Theatre of ancient Greece states:
 Athens exported the festival (the Dioneysia) to its numerous colonies and allies in order to promote a common cultural identity.
However, no reference is given for this statement in that article and no mention of such a political function is mentioned here on the Dionysia article.  So, I am not clear if the function should also be mentioned in this article or whether it should be deleted from the former.  I have made enquiries at University of Oxford and intend to update and edit both articles if they clarify matters for me. (see also: http://www.apgrd.ox.ac.uk/learning/an-introduction-to/an-introduction-to-ancient-greek-theatre)
LookingGlass (talk) 10:49, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Theatre as tool of cultural propaganda  

message: It makes me wince, to see such surreal mispronounciations of foreign words. Eg Dionysios,(Dennis, in English) being given to be D👁on👁s👁is. This is ridiculous! Or should that be r👁d👁culous? 46.97.177.90 (talk) 19:01, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mispronouncing names 

message: In Bettany Hughes's Bacchus Uncovered, she visits the carnival (it is not explicitly called so) of Skyros and points the similarities with the Dionysia.
Is the Dionysia acknowledged as an influence on the Greek carnival?
--Error (talk) 23:15, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek carnival