lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ben Kennedy (soccer, born 1987)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 07:43, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Ben Kennedy (footballer, born 1987) →  – per WP:NCSP Joeykai (talk) 04:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 11:33, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 October 2021
Template talk:WikiProject Turkey

message: Hello,
As the template is rather big, I would like to suggest addition of a small option to the template. Unfortunately I have no idea how to implement this myself. --Free smyrnan 12:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Does it work now? Baristarim 20:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I helped out, it works OK now. It's in use on Talk:Artin Penik. Atilim Gunes Baydin 21:17, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, thanks.. Baristarim 21:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small version would be very helpful 

message: I've got an updated template at Template:WikiProject Turkey/sandbox which uses WPBannerMeta. Any objections to using it? -- WOSlinker (talk) 11:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: . — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version of template
Talk:Young German Order

message: Jungdo was not a youth movement. The adolescents of the pre-war Wandervogel movement had grown into adults after WW I. The name Young German Order rather refers to a renewed ('young') völkisch Germany than to Germany's youth. Thus, Jungdo was a far-right paramilitary organisation like the Stahlhelm, Bund der Frontsoldaten or the SA, although it wasn't really attached to a party, as the other two were (the Stahlhelm being close to the German National People's Party).
The assumption that Jungdo was a youth movement is right in one aspect. It had a youth organisation of its own, the Young German Youth. The picture showing the cover of a magazine is actually a periodical of the youth organisation. 87.169.33.176 01:38, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Phytosaurus

message: The species list for Phytosaurus should be updated to reflect that "Phytosaurus" doughtyi is recovered in a polytomy with other leptosuchomorphs in the cladistic analysis of Stocker (2010). Phytosaurus doughtyi is a new combination by Hay (1902) for the nomen dubium "Belodon" scolopax Cope 1881 (though Hay gave no justification for referring scolopax to Phytosaurus). 
O. P. Hay. 1902. Bibliography and Catalogue of the Fossil Vertebrata of North America. Bulletin of the United States Geological Survey 179:1-868
 M. R. Stocker. 2010. A new taxon of phytosaur (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) from the Late Triassic (Norian) Sonsela Member (Chinle Formation) in Arizona, and a critical reevaluation of Leptosuchus Case, 1922. Palaeontology 53:997-1022 68.4.28.33 (talk) 15:32, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species list 

message: any idea where this animal was found?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.57.247 (talk) 16:59, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Anonymous user
Talk:Marchy Lee

message: I won't bother editing this without getting some consensus, but virtually every website reference that I can find (in the course of reseaching his FBMW results) describes him as either Marchy Lee Yin-Kin or Marchy Lee Yin-kin. Not Ying-Kin. They could all have got their details from the same inaccurate source, but even his the Team Meritus website states Yin-Kin. Adrian M. H. 18:44, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Darryl O'Young

message: According to Porsche, O'Young is Canadian, not Chinese. And China does not allow dual citizenship, so he can't be Chinese, unless Porsche is mistaken about their own team racer.
Penser (talk) 16:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality 
Talk:King Yin Lei

message: I can help merge.  Give me some time.  Benjwong 04:13, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: This article is a mess - the title should be Lei, not Lane, and the content needs updating.  Can someone help?
Rodparkes (talk) 07:24, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've "given it a go". Can't quite figure out how to move the page as there is already a redirect by the proper name ... Verne Equinox (talk) 01:42, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: A mess

message: This article is woefully out of date: it basically stops in 2008, with the declaration that it is an historic monument. It needs to be updated with the extensive renovation (2008-2010) and reopening as a public attraction under the management of the HK government. In addition, a gallery of pictures might be better than the current sidebar with only a few; Wikimedia Commons has 20+ great images to choose from, including more interior shots. Unfortunately, I do not read Chinese so many of the primary sources are unavailable to me. — Molly-in-md (talk) 13:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be updated
Talk:Arguin

message: I've found the year of 1448 referenced as the year that the Portuguese established a commercial fortress on Arguin, from Birmingham, David. Trade and Empire in the Atlantic, 1400-1600. London, UK: Routledge, 2000. p 32.  L Hamm 02:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Falling Man (novel)

message: Is this book notable enough to justify its own article, as opposed to being merged into an article about the author?  Have there been reviews in major newspapers?  Does it meet Wikipedia:Notability (fiction)? --Elonka 02:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability concerns

message: What was the link to this site removed? It's considered the most comprehensive site about DeLillo and his work on the internet and would be of interest to anyone seeking more information. What harm does the link cause? If there's no discussion, I will revert it. Inoculatedcities 21:35, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a fan site that was spammed all over Wikipedia. Are you seriously saying that this page has any legitimate encyclopedic information? IrishGuy talk 21:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to "Don DeLillo's America" site
Talk:List of Japanese Navy ships and war vessels in World War II

message: Where are the cruisers, destroyers etc. ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.88.228.225 (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no assertion of notability or even usability of this list. It'd be great if each vessel had an article, or at least if each class of vessels had an article. -- Emana (talk) 03:35, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments?

message: The article gives a displacement for every class of ship, but since it avoids saying if that displacement is in short tons or long tons and if that displacement is the treaty displacement or for a full load, it is nearly useless. 2601:645:101:1874:94B2:2F1:9E8C:2D23 (talk) 21:28, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Displacement 

message: I missed Kaibōkan-ships.--Falkmart (talk) 12:41, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added the Kaibokan, merged them with the destroyers, and did the same for the torpedo boats. Brown Water Admiral (talk) 09:15, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaibōkan 

message: Hi, people. Look at the battlecruisers table; I have added a column of what I think is vital info. Should this be done for the other ship types? Hungrydog55 (talk) 00:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main battery column
Talk:Slinger (dish)

message: Sure, merging them is a good idea. They seem to have complimentary info. Whitebox 02:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Slingers (food) 

message: I'm visiting my parents in St. Louis and today my father took me to the O.T. Hodge Chile Parlor to try a Slinger and I noticed that their menu lists a slinger with a tamale on top as a "top gun" and they have something different listed as a "top one". Is O.T. Hodge the exception or did the original author have it wrong? Pharaonic 21:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top One or Top Gun? 

message: The quote in the first paragraph has the word "damn" in it. Not really necessary for an encyclopedia article, I suggest it be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.242.187.97 (talk) 20:06, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Profanity
Talk:Ascii85

message: We can use digits d (0 ≤ d ≤ 94) as the ASCII code d + 32, use 95 as "¥", can use all ASCII characters.
base 10	base 96 	equals
0      	(space) 	0 × 960
1      	!       	1 × 960
2      	"       	2 × 960
3      	#       	3 × 960
4      	$       	4 × 960
5      	%       	5 × 960
6      	&       	6 × 960
...    	...     	...
16     	0       	16 × 960
17     	1       	17 × 960
...    	...     	...
25     	9       	25 × 960
26     	:       	26 × 960
27     	;       	27 × 960
...    	...     	...
32     	@       	32 × 960
33     	A       	33 × 960
34     	B       	34 × 960
...    	...     	...
58     	Z       	58 × 960
...    	...     	...
65     	a       	65 × 960
66     	b       	66 × 960
...    	...     	...
90     	z       	90 × 960
...    	...     	...
94     	~       	94 × 960
95     	¥       	95 × 960
96     	!(space)	1 × 961 + 0 × 960
97     	!!      	1 × 961 + 1 × 960
98     	!"      	1 × 961 + 2 × 960
...    	...     	...
191    	!¥      	1 × 961 + 95 × 960
...    	...     	...
255    	"_      	2 × 961 + 63 × 960
...    	...     	...
4095   	J_      	42 × 961 + 63 × 960
...    	...     	...
65535  	'*_     	7 × 962 + 10 × 961 + 63 × 960
...    	...     	...
: First: ¥ ist not part of ASCII. And the "space character" is not considered as "printable" character. But using your encoding you would need infinite large numbers if your data grows more and more. That's why all these "binary to text" encodings encode data in chunks, usually encoding n octets in n+k characters. For 96 (or 94) "printable ASCII characters" it would need at least n=9 and k=2, so you encode 9 octets in 11 printable characters. That gives you an encoding overhead of 22.22 %. That is a bit better than the 25 % overhead of Base85 (It would save 29 KiByte for each encoded megabyte of binary data), but it would need 72 bit arithmetics which is much more expensive than the 32 bit arithmetics that Base85 needs. --RokerHRO (talk) 11:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has published a proposed Base91 standard: http://base91.sourceforge.net/. Though one of the strengths of base encoding is being able to store and transfer data in situations where the special/non ASCII characters aren't allowed (0-32, 127-255). The more characters you add to the encoding set, the less cross-platform it becomes. For example, even Base64 has a "Base64URL" alternative, because the former uses unsafe URL characters. In addition, the closer you get to base-256/binary, the less the relative overhead is reduced (where the approximate overheads per base are 16 100%, 32 60%, 64 33%, 85 25%, 94 23%). 174.20.251.155 (talk) 02:19, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why not "Ascii96"? 

message: Anything not using the Ascii order can't really be called Ascii85, but a Base85 variant.
Now, about the example: [EDIT]after a second look, it depends on the implementation so there is nothing wrong with it. AveYo (talk) 13:16, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no problem to rename the article from Ascii85 to Base85. --RokerHRO (talk) 13:50, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Ascii85 example
Talk:Kot Diji

message: I just migrated this article to Template:Infobox ancient site and I was a little confused when I read it. What is confusing is that this article is about the Harappan 1 to Harappan 2 site, but the article only has photos of the much more recent fort, which already has its own article! Ideally, someone should get photos of the actual ruins of that ancient settlement and put those in the article to replace the fort photos. Also, I get the impression that Kot Diji is the name for both the modern town and the ancient site? Would be good to mention that in the article. Also note that I used the national map of Pakistan for the infobox, which is more recognizable than the map of Sindh in my opinion. --AlexanderVanLoon (talk) 10:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some suggestions for improvement
Talk:Soultans

message: I wrote this article a while ago, so I can't find the URLs that I used for the sources, but they were in German or some other langauge. I also saw a CD of them, but other than that, I can't find any of the orginal sources I used. They're definitely notable (20,000+ Google hits and they've released a non-self published CD under Coconut Records, which has also made stars of the likes of Londonbeat and Haddaway. I tried accessing their site, but it wouldn't open, so I'm at a loss as to what to do. It does meet notability, but yeah, it needs sources and I've other things to do at the moment. I can't be bothered going through the internet searching for pages; the first couple no longer exist, so I'm not really volunteering for the job... Sorry I can't be of more help. Spawn Man 07:41, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm... do you know the url of any of the sites?  You could see if copies exist in the wayback machine.  I'm not really volunteering to dig either.  I just thought I'd let you know since I put those tags on your article.  Regards, -MrFizyx 15:11, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it's taken a while, but I've finally added some sources and notability. As per your talk page, I'd love if you could take a look at the article to make sure everything's alright. Cheers, Spawn Man (talk) 09:55, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability & Sources: 
Talk:Chaukhandi tombs

message: This is a good work in progress, not far from a B-class. Consider these points for improvement:
* Coverage: Lead section states it is a cemetery used from the 15th to the 18th cemeteries, but little is said directly about that time period. It starts with "Modern Period", and then describes the debates.
** Place what is known about the Chaukhandi tombs, based on archaeology or texts, in one section, maybe "Early History". Follow this with "Modern History".
* Supporting materials: The photos are good. Perhaps an infobox for a cemetery. See Template:Infobox cemetery.
* Grammar & Style: This is mostly ok, but I would ask someone to read over it for general "readability".
Good luck! Boneyard90 (talk) 14:21, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:Death Commentary
Talk:Colonial Raptor

message: A nice profile shot for the infobox would be nice. 132.205.93.32 02:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: reqimage

message: The device in the back of a raptor appears to be an oscilloscope.  Can anyone confirm/identify which model?  Since according to the wikipedia article on battlestar galactica the original show used tektronix equipment, is this a reference to the original show? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dsignoff (talk • contribs) 01:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oscilloscope 

message: I'd like to know who got the dimensional information on this page, and where it came from. A ship that is 8.53 meters in length, has 2 crew, AND carries 8-10 people, AND has FTL capabilities? The Black Hawk military helicopter is 19 meters in length (just more than twice the size length), carries 2 pilots, and up to 14 people. 71.240.168.205 (talk) 06:40, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Physical Dimensions

message: "however, it seems" is not a grouping of words that belongs on Wikipedia, unless your quoting someone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.137.207.191 (talk) 01:54, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems 
Talk:Reforms of Umar's era

message: Shi'a view:
--Striver 02:26, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

message: If this article were a detailed discussion of the reforms of 'Umar's period, it might warrant its own article. As it is, this is little more than a restatement of what is already in the entry on 'Umar. Why does this entry exist at all?128.135.203.166 (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this a separate entry?
Talk:Robowarrior

message: Robo Warrior is easier than Bomber King, bomb doesn't kill you, but you are hurt, like when you are attacked by enemy. I suggest to add information about easier gameplay.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.77.94.33 (talk) 00:12, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Robo Warrior vs. Bomber King
Talk:St Joseph's RC Academy

message: Unless something drastic happens, I will recommend that St Joseph's RC Academy be deleted as it has not even a remote claim to notability.WidowerScallan 02:34, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

message: The two articles seem to be about the same school, even if at two phases in its history. Finavon (talk) 23:25, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, but I would suggest merging the other way, as school appears to be called St Joseph's Academy, not St Joseph's RC Academy. Johnhousefriday (talk) 13:59, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Ottoman wars in the Near East

message: ==Persia==
Surprising that there is no mention of Savfid Persia, considering that it was the Ottoman empire's most dangerous opponent in the east - the Eastern Islamic equivalent of Habsburg Spain or Austria, if you will.
And what exactly does "near east" mean as opposed to east or middle east? I know that Persia is not so much middle east, but still. Timur's campaign was defintely middle east Tourskin 07:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Surprising that there is no mention of Savfid Persia, considering that it was the Ottoman empire's most dangerous opponent in the east - the Eastern Islamic equivalent of Habsburg Spain or Austria, if you will.
And what exactly does "near east" mean as opposed to east or middle east? I know that Persia is not so much middle east, but still. Timur's campaign was defintely middle east Tourskin 07:01, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Persia

message: This article should be improved, looking like the Turkish version of this article. Mirochi (talk) 14:47, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article should be improved
Talk:Colton Plaza

message: Hello, I am an American that stayed in Ichikawa two years ago. I keep in touch with friends still living in Ichikawa. I heard that the Outback Steak House closed down, so I deleted it from this entry.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.161.147.42 (talk) 19:18, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Turkey/Assessment

message: == Assessment ==
How are the articles assessed? We need some clarification. The :Category:Turkey articles by quality page offers no guidance. --Adoniscik(t, c) 00:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: How are the articles assessed? We need some clarification. The :Category:Turkey articles by quality page offers no guidance. --Adoniscik(t, c) 00:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:Albertsons LLC

message: I haven't yet edited it in, but it NorCal division has reportedly been sold to Save Mart... Ranma9617 02:57, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Breaking news

message: Not all the information on Albertsons LLC should be deemed as "History". That signals a lack of information. MortalConviction 16:58, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: SuperValu owns the Southern California Albertsons stores. The LA Times article reference and closed store photo should be removed or relocated to the SVU page. Celliot2 (talk) 11:56, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: So. Cal. NOT ABS LLC

message: Shouldn't there be a Convenience Stores template at the bottom of the page? (like the ones on here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weigel's , and here - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uni-Mart .) The Convenience Store template on other pages contains a link to Albertsons LLC.
Fewmenleft (talk) 21:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Convenience Store? 

message: This isn't right. I've been to an Albertsons grocery store long before 2006. That needs to be changed. 4.238.0.44 (talk) 20:24, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founded in 2006? 

message: Albertsons no longer is two companies. Cerberus bought the remaining stores owned by SuperValu. Now they form one company, under Albertsons LLC. So the two Albertsons articles should not be separate. They should be merged, under the name, Albertsons. Viller the Great (talk) 02:18, 3 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albertsons is one company again
Talk:Fleischmann (band)

message: This article was in wikipedia before (I didn't create it) and can still be found in mirrors. Perhaps the original article can be restored for history's sake. --Fm-creator 03:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reimport 

message: Apart from the internet links cited or available via google, the three cited CDs (Hunger, Fleischwolf and Das Treibhaus). --Fm-creator 03:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Race of Champions

message: I don't know anything about racing, but are you sure Jenson Button isn't representing England? If David Coulthard is representing Scotland - which is part of Great Britain - it would seem a bit odd to have a Great Britain team. HornetMike 19:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice catch, it does indeed appear that Button and Priaulx should be representing England rather than Great Britain, I've fixed it now. Meanrhardtfan 22:32, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Button

message: There's nothing on this article to tell you what the race involves - are they racing using karts, rally cars, formula fords, or what?147.114.226.174 13:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cars?

message: The 2008 Race of Champions has been created and updated to reflect the happenings of December 14th, but this one hadn't. I have done a simple edit to bring it up to date (i.e. changed the tense and named Loeb as the winner), but it will take someone more clued up on motorsport/the event, preferably a contributor to the 2008 Race of Champions article, to flesh out the 2008 section here. a_boardley (talk) 14:02, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2008 

message: Now the 'the next event will be in December 2008' text is redundant and modified, this article could do with a 'in 2009 the race will...' section. I have had a quick scout at the RoC website but cannot find any information or press releases. Can contributors in the know add info on 2009 as it becomes available? a_boardley (talk) 14:03, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2009
Talk:In Loving Memory Of...

message: There are incorrect names and some credits missing. I can vouch. I was there. Maxton Smart (talk) 15:37, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album credits
Talk:Robotics Institute

message: I propose that National Robotics Engineering Center be merged into Robotics Institute. I think that the content in the National Robotics Engineering Center article can easily be explained in the context of Robotics Institute, and that the article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Foo will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned.
(Or, more informally, there's been very little activity on the page for several months, and there's barely three sentences!)
Vickytnz (talk) 22:52, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Have removed proposal tag as both pages have developed since the initial suggestion, making merger less appropriate than it may have been in 2012. Both would benefit from significant cleanup, so not impossible that a future merger would be more sensible. --Haruth (talk) 18:02, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Henry Augustus Pilsbry

message: It would certainly be nice if someone could provide a photo of Henry Pilsbry! Tim Ross 21:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A note