Talk:Meir Kahane

message: Why is he listed in the category "American Criminals"? 148.78.243.121 04:51, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: It must be noted that this affair was denied and has no coroborating evidence. The only people writing about it are Rabbi Kahane's political nemesis.
It must also be noted that unlike what someone wrote below: "Since the NYT source is impeccable..."(sic) the NYT has been caught red-handed in allowing lies to fester when it is against those whose politics they dislike. References for that have been added.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fairnsquare (talk • contribs) 04:14, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: NYT is a good source per WP:RS. I can't see any real policy grounds for removing the section and some of the changes you've made don't really fit in with the style requirements. You could be entirely correct and it's a political concoction, I have no idea, but it meets the standards for inclusion as far as I can tell. Sol (talk) 19:04, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

text: "The reliability of a source and the basis of this reliability depends on the context. No source is universally reliable. Each source must be carefully weighed in the context of an article to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made and is the best such source."
I didn't suggest taking away the section - is that a straw man?
It is proper to note the context and the people reporting per wikis guidlines that you refered to.
If you feel something doesn't fit in the style guidelines then be specific and point out how or make it stylistically pleasing. 
Don't remove  something because you personaly don't like it. 
I did not do that and neither should you.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fairnsquare (talk • contribs) 19:17, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a strawman. If the information were from a bad source then it should be removed.  If you've got any sources talking about how the NYT's is wrong on this/made it up/etc. then you could insert them as a counterpoint but you can't editorialize within the article itself. It's not because I personally don't like. Sol (talk) 19:44, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

text: You don't understand my point. Its not the "New York Times" but its the author that is being questioned. The point about the NYT is that they do not have a double-check but rely on the authors.
I gave a source indicating the author's bias and that is his own statement on his desire to broing Rabbi kahane down for the Rabbi's political beliefs which this author is in in disagreement with. So I am willing to hear how you would put in the very fair questionability of this source. But to ignore that totally ... wrong and unacceptable.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fairnsquare (talk • contribs) 20:02, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes on supposed affair

message: "Kahane was assassinated by El Sayyid Nosair in Manhattan in 1990 after concluding a speech in a New York hotel"
El Sayyid Nosair article states: "He was also charged by the State of New York as the gunman who killed Rabbi Meir Kahane...While acquitted of that charge Nosair was convicted of weapons charges"
Wikipedia find Nosair guilty as charged? I'm sure his lawyers will find that interesting.
:Placed requests of sources on all the assertions of Nosair being convicted of murder that I noticed. The editor with such a casual disregard for the facts even had the gall to place this in the so-called encyclopedia!!! LOL -> "Nosair was acquitted of murder because no witness had actually seen him pull the trigger." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.29.224.251 (talk) 01:08, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nosair was aquitted? 

message: Or there abouts. If you look at the differences, there seems to be quite a bit of difference. Can anybody look at all the changes and see what is what. I remove a little bit about Goldstein. Thanks! --Tom 13:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits since May 1st 2007 

message: :OK, if the assassin wasn't a terrorist or murderer, what is he? Also, do folks agree that Kahane was assassinated or should it be murdered? Thanks, --Tom 17:32, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: 'I edited expansions in the intro. which is not supposed to contain them. The second contains this material, which is regiven below in the appropriate section dealing wih Kahane's death. It can't stay in both places, and should not be in the intro. since that deals with Kahane not with Al Qaeda, and terrorist incidents:-
::'El Sayyid Nosair later stood trial for the murder in state court and was acquitted of murder, though convicted of firearms possession. Later he faced Federal charges including Kahane's murder as part of the 1993 al Qaeda terrorist truck-bombing of the World Trade Center and plots to bomb the United Nations building and to assassinate Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak.Snared in The Terrorist Web Time, 6 September 1993 He was convicted on these Federal charges and is serving a life sentence. 'Nishidani 15:51, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intro 

message: I deleted the word "former" from "former member of the Israeli Knesset". He's dead, so it doesn't matter much that he's a former MK.
It was restored with the explanation that he was expelled from the Knesset before he died. I don't see how that is relevant. It doesn't make the word "former" any more useful.
Finding a concise encyclopedic way to explicitly mention that he was expelled in the opening paragraph may be useful, though. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 08:41, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Former member" 

message: Psudonym is a purposefully loaded word, and difficult to spell. Meir Kahane had pen names, just like Stephen King and Kurt Vonnegut and tens of thousands of other authors.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.190.146.35 (talk) 21:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Psudeonym" 

message: **** 14:24, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meir Kahane's Life as Michael King 

message: One reason why Wikipedia often cannot be taken seriously as an "encyclopedia" or even presenting fact-based articles -- is revealed by this article on Kahane.  
Contrary to claims made in this article, Kahane never "infiltrated" the Birch Society for the FBI nor was he ever a "consultant" to the FBI concerning the JBS.  Even his widow, Libby, told me that she had no corroborating documentation for this claim.
I possess the entire FBI HQ file on the JBS (12,000 pages; HQ 62-104401) along with most FBI JBS-related field office files -- and there is no mention whatsoever of Kahane nor is there any document which mentions somebody whose description would correspond to Kahane.  
In addition, FBI field offices that used informants within any organization had to first prepare a summary memo about their proposed informant and then request authorization from HQ to use them.  
After HQ approved use of the informant, periodic field office reports were submitted to HQ which summarized whatever info the informant provided and the field office would characterize every informant's data in terms of reliability (such as "of known reliability"  OR "unknown reliability" OR the office assigned a percentage such as "informant information found to be 95% accurate".   
BUT there are no such documents in any FBI JBS-related file because the FBI never sought or had informants within the Birch Society!
For an actual example showing how an FBI field office requested permission to use an informant and reported on reliability of information received, see the following documents pertaining to Rev. Delmar Dennis who infiltrated the most violent Klan in our nation's history---the White Knights of the KKK of Mississippi.  Notice, too, that the Bureau assigned a code name and symbol number to every informant.  Significantly, NO SUCH DOCUMENTS EXIST on Kahane with respect to "infiltrating" the JBS for the FBI.
http://sites.google.com/site/ernie124102/dennis
Beyond that, every FBI informant usually had expenses (e.g. travel to/from meetings, purchasing publications, membership dues, etc.) plus many were compensated for their services weekly --- so, obviously, FBI files always contain expense reports or memos reporting whatever monies were paid to them.  BUT there are no such memos or reports whatsoever in ANY JBS file----because the FBI never had informants inside the JBS!
Furthermore, you have to ask the obvious question:  what information about the JBS did the FBI supposedly want that it could not obtain except by “infiltration” by "informants"?
Lastly -- the FBI never conducted a formal investigation of the JBS.  Informants were used by the Bureau primarily in instances where official investigations were conducted -- such as, for example, inside the KKK and CPUSA.   
There were, of course, people who contacted the FBI of their own volition and then provided unsolicited raw information. In fact, many JBS members and JBS officials contacted their local FBI field office to ask questions, to report information such as telling the FBI they planned to subscribe to a Communist publication or to tell the FBI about some person or organization they suspected of being "subversive" or "pro-Communist", etc. If the contact was in person or by phone, an FBI Agent usually recorded the information in memo form and the memo became part of the JBS file (and/or other relevant files) but it was considered RAW information--which had not been verified as to accuracy.
The FBI Chicago field file on the JBS (100-36671) contains a serial which illustrates how unsolicited raw information was often received from citizens---but the person providing the information was not an FBI informant.
Serial #420 is a 29 page memo concerning a February 25-28, 1966 National Coordinating Committee meeting of the W.E.B. DuBois Clubs of America (Chicago file 100-40865).  The FBI characterized the person who provided the information contained in that memo as “has furnished insufficient info to determine reliability”.   
Page iii of the memo contains a “remarks” section at the bottom which makes the following comment about the person who provided the information:
“He is not being considered for PSI (potential security informant) because he holds ‘ultra-right’ views and it is not believed he could be controlled.  However, he has been advised the FBI will be happy to receive any information he has that he feels might be of interest to the FBI.  [Name deleted] because of his ‘ultra-right’ views is afforded no direction by the Chicago office.”    [Chicago 100-36671, #420; 3/31/66].
It is not uncommon for FBI files to reflect information received from people whom the Bureau described as "mentally unbalanced" or "a bigot" or "extremist".  It is also clear from FBI files that certain types of people would not be seriously considered as informants--including those whom the Bureau thought might want to use their association for personal benefit or who might embarrass the Bureau because they were unstable or irrational or considered to be political extremists.
For example: In an FBI memo dated January 21, 1964, the Bureau proclaimed that...
"As a matter of fact, the Bureau will not approve any individual for development as a confidential informant if he is a member of the John Birch Society." [FBI HQ file 62-104401, serial #2027, 1/21/64 memo to Mr. Callahan from (name excised)].
While it is possible that Meir Kahane contacted the FBI in New York City to report something he thought they might like to know, that hardly would convert him into an "FBI informant"
Ernie1241 (talk) 20:46, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  KAHANE AND BIRCH SOCIETY 

message: I added a photograph of the graffiti, 'Gas the Arabs'. I understand there have been some passionate efforts to blank the photograph across several languages of Wikipedia, but I've only seen it done for apparently nationalist reasons.  Given that there are reliable sources which connect vandalism in Hebron calling for the murder of Arabs to Meir Kahane, is there a sound reason for blanking the photograph?  If using the photograph here seems unacceptable to you, or fails to meet some standard, why is it unacceptable, and what is that standard?  Cheers, DBaba (talk) 14:32, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to add two citations which include imagery of this particular graffiti, and restore the photograph. Please respond to these remarks, here, if you feel the need to blank the image. DBaba (talk) 11:49, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

text: I was wondering that too; it most probably was a copyright issue, which is taken very seriously around here. StonyBrook (talk) 00:36, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: A 1971 Kahane quotation from Chapter 9, The Righteous Assassin, of The Fall of the House of Bush, Craig Unger, 2007, pp.133-134:
:In two years' time, [the Arabs] ... will come to me, bow to me, lick my feet, and I will be merciful and allow them to leave. Whoever does not will be slaughtered.
    ←   ZScarpia   19:19, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is that book reliable?  Anyway the quotation is from "The False Prophet" by Robert Friedman, page 217.  I can only see a snippet. Zerotalk 03:26, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello. Writing a proper reply is taking me a long time unfortunately. I'm having difficulty even just writing a short reply to your question about reliability. It's an interesting question because, although his books obviously don't fall into the category of academic writing which is regarded as most reliable, Craig Unger made his career as a journalist writing for and editing a number of magazines and newspapers which would themselves normally be regarded as reliable (without being very publicly sued). Most of what Unger has to say about Kahane would, in any case, actually be better cited back to the sources he himself uses, Robert Friedman being a main one, though he does make an interesting claim, original to himself but stretching things too far I think, that, because of El Sayyid Nosair's (fairly tenuous) links to Osama bin Laden, Kahane should be counted as the first victim of al-Qaeda. The question then arises as to whether sources such as Friedman should be regarded as reliable. I would say, notable and worth attributing material to, definitely, but without corroboration, for anything controversial, not reliable on their own.       ←   ZScarpia   23:11, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Here is another report of it from 1985, but this one says he give it up in 1988. Confusion reigns. Zerotalk 03:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's another Los Angeles Times article about it. The first article does say that Kahane sought an injunction to overturn the loss of his citizenship. Perhaps he was succesful.       ←   ZScarpia   04:09, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

text: More still: Los Angeles Times - Kahane Seeks Citizenship, 26 October 1988. The article says that Kahane did formally renounce his US citizenship in September 1988 (and then announced a month later that he wanted it back again). So, it looks as though he either managed to over turn the loss of citizenship of 1985, or, at least, have its implementation frozen until 1988.      ←   ZScarpia   14:21, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: According to this article he was indeed stripped of his citizenship; he fought that decision and he won, having his citizenship restored in 1987. --W\|/haledad (Talk to me)  18:10, 17 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kahane quotation: "I will be merciful and allow them to leave. Whoever does not will be slaughtered." 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:52, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Rav-Kahane.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Tugsandtost (talk) 23:09, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there something particular from that book that you think should be said in this article? Or something already in this article that is supported by this book? Otherwise it is senseless to refer to a source without actually referring to it Cannolis (talk) 23:57, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 30 October 2014 

message: Anti-Semitic vandalism is here, calling the defense groups he formed against anti-Semitism "so-called" defense groups.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.74.188.234 (talk) 12:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please remove the anti-Semitic vandalism from this article. 

message: The category is "American people of Latvian-Jewish descent", as his mother Sonia (née Trainin) Kahane is Latvian born.
79.180.33.238 (talk) 06:15, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide a reliable source describing his mother's place of birth? Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:22, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  I want to add a categroy but I can't as the article is protected 

message: User:UnequivocalAmbivalence: the book sure exist, you cannot have looked very hard if you didn´t find it: 
see this and this, Huldra (talk) 21:29, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly, neither of those have the same subtitle as the book cited in the article (Eyes Upon The Land: Talks by the Lubavitcher Rebbe on the Holy Land). Secondly, I could still find no mention of Meir Kahane in either of those sources, and you have not provided any such quotation, so until a quote and page number is provided to support the statement being made, I am going to delete it, as it is an exceptionally controversial claim and requires multiple quality sources per WP:EXCEPTIONAL. UnequivocalAmbivalence (talk) 22:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have the book? Have you checked it? Huldra (talk) 22:04, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I checked every available version, including the link you provided. Do you have a specific location where this claim can be found? UnequivocalAmbivalence (talk) 22:08, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I don´t have the book, and there is no preview anywhere (that I know of). Which is why I wonder why anyone can dismiss it, *if* they have not checked the book. Huldra (talk) 22:18, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as transcripts of the book are available online and do not seem to contain the information, and because this definitely falls under the description of WP:EXCEPTIONAL, particularly the part about "reports of a statement by someone that seems out of character, or against an interest they had previously defended", multiple high quality sources are required, and if the information is valid it should be easy to find supplementary sources. Also, WP:CHALLENGE states "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material", and "Do not leave unsourced or poorly sourced material in an article if it might damage the reputation of living people or existing groups". Also WP:ONUS states that "The onus to achieve consensus for inclusion is on those seeking to include disputed content.", so the burden of proof that what is being said actually occurs in the source is upon those wishing to include the material. Policy seems very clear on this, so I don't see how it is abnormal to dismiss a contentious rumor like this until proof can be provided for its legitimacy.UnequivocalAmbivalence (talk) 00:04, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Book 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Meir Kahane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070930153827/http://www.wrmea.com/backissues/0799/9907081.html to http://www.wrmea.com/backissues/0799/9907081.html
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5mr4x36zY to http://www.mfa.gov.il
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://kahane.org/meir/interview.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:22, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The author should go back through this article and clean up the grammar and syntax. There are places where it reads like gibberish.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:ec26:9a00:84f:d8fc:dd0e:46dd (talk • contribs) 
: Feel free to take active part in improving this article. Debresser (talk) 21:09, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar and readability 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Meir Kahane. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090913042344/http://www.ou.org/index.php/jewish_action/article/50163/ to http://www.ou.org/index.php/jewish_action/article/50163/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090913042344/http://www.ou.org/index.php/jewish_action/article/50163/ to http://www.ou.org/index.php/jewish_action/article/50163/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100414090038/http://www.adl.org/extremism/jdl_chron.asp to http://www.adl.org/extremism/jdl_chron.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110926205341/http://www.adl.org/presrele/extremism_72/4016_72.asp to http://www.adl.org/presrele/extremism_72/4016_72.asp
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mfa.gov.il/
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://library.nps.navy.mil/home/tgp/kach.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "Howerver, Kahane himself opposed the Black Panthers because they had supported anti-Jewish riots in Massachusetts had left-wing views."
Should that not be 'and had left-wing views'?Doug1943 13:35, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, was corrected. StonyBrook (talk) 03:55, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this sentence make any sense? 

message: In the last paragraph in the introduction it says Meir Kahane was murdered by an Arab gunman. However, Egyptians are not Arab. It would be more accurate to say "Egyptian-American gunman" or just "gunman."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.101.180.123 (talk) 15:26, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "arab gunman" 

message: This sentence is problematic because it is not cited: "However, Kahane himself opposed the Black Panthers because they had supported anti-Jewish riots in Massachusetts and had left-wing views." A quick google search reveals no information on Black Panthers supporting anti-Jewish riots in  Massachusetts, nor the occurrence of anti-Jewish riots at the time when the Black Panther party was active. Therefore, if this information is true, it needs to be cited.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.101.180.123 (talk) 15:30, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Black Panthers 

message: I was reading the article The Woman on the Bridge. It details the suicide of Gloria Jean D’Argenios (a.k.a. Estelle Evans), who committed suicide after Meir Kahane (a.k.a. Michael King) broke-off an affair with her.
King/Kahane said he setup a memorial foundation in her name after she died, but it was used to funnel money to the Jewish Defense Fund:
[After her death] ... he set up a memorial foundation in her name, which was a Trojan horse to raise money for the organization that became the Jewish Defense League.
And:
All his underlying hatred for others seeded the origin for the JDL in the spring of 1968. “We have no great funds, no great influence, so the answer is simple: to do outrageous things,” he told New York Times reporter Michael Kaufman in January 1971. Money had to be raised, though, and it required setting up charitable, tax-exempt foundations. One of them, incorporated in August 1967, a full six months before the official existence of the JDL, bore the name of Estelle Donna Evans.
And:
When [New York Times reporter Michael Kaufman] Kaufman asked Kahane about the foundation’s namesake, the rabbi claimed she had been his former secretary in his failed consulting operation, she had died of terminal cancer, and her “well-to-do” family had endowed the foundation.
Finally:
Kaufman and fellow Times reporter Richard Severo felt something was off about the foundation and set out to prove their suspicions that it was fraudulent. In the process, they unearthed Kahane’s dangerous hypocrisy: promoting ethnonationalism and preaching against intermarriage while covering up an affair with a non-Jewish woman. “We could have changed the history of Israel,” Severo said nearly two decades later. “I wonder how many of his Orthodox supporters would have continued to follow him … if they knew the man was a charlatan?”
Jeffrey Walton  (talk) 15:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable early funding for JDL 

message: In the course of some reading on US nationality law, I came across Kahane's case.  Clearing up some earlier confusion on this (see Kahane quotation "...") I added some additional details about the two separate revocation/renunciation proceedings related to his citizenship in 
Immigration to Israel — Election to Knesset: the first initiated by US Department of State, challenged by him, and overturned in court; the second initiated by him, later challenged by him, but upheld in court.
Hopefully this is not in violation of the current discretionary sanctions for this topic.
Compwiztobe (talk) 13:38, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: NB also the correction to the year in which the Knesset changed its nationality rules, 1987 not 1985  --Compwiztobe (talk) 14:16, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Citizenship 

message: "he attended high school at both Abraham Lincoln High School and the Brooklyn Talmudical Academy" is subpar for Wikipedia. The Kahane entry at https://www.encyclopedia.com/politics/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/kahane-meir has the activist senior
"quit his Jewish high school to attend a local public school" and this was after being accepted at am Orthodox/right-wing post-HS yeshiva. A proper wording would first of all state BTA/Brooklyn TA first. The OU/Orthodox Union's https://jewishaction.com/books/rabbi_meir_kahane_his_life_and_thought article, in reference to FORMAL education, omits the stunt. There's enough 'activist' material to showcase without this. NPOV need not play up this stunt.  Pi314m (talk) 11:21, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: High school stunt

message: Q: would it be valid to change kahane.org --> https://www.kahanefoundation.org/ ...?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Howard from NYC (talk • contribs) 00:05, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that this website has anything to do with Meir Kahane, it's a international peace organization which includes Muslims which is against the Kahanist ideology. RowanJ LP2 (talk) 14:37, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Dead Link(s) 

message: Kahane's relevance to current affairs is missing. Can someone add? The page currently reads "His legacy continues to influence militant and far-right political groups active today in Israel", which doesn't capture the fact that his followers (Itamar Ben-Gvir particularly) have now will have huge influence in the Government after the 2022 election. In the Legacy section, there is nothing after 2017. This needs updating as Kahanists have become more involved in the mainstream, and Itamar Ben-Gvir and others are reaching a new generation of Israeli voters. That's worth noting, as it is particularly meaningful when someone who has been dead for a long time is inspiring contemporary political movements. 
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/10/israel-leader-of-far-right-jewish-power-party-pays-tribute-to-late-racist-rabbi 2A00:23C7:A829:B401:F4A9:A5D0:8232:AA30 (talk) 22:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I totally agree that Kahane's relevance to current affairs through the Otzma Yehudit/Religious Zionism political party (Itamar Ben-Gvir, etc) being the 3rd largest party (much like Kahane's Kach party being the 3rd largest party in 1988 had Israel not disenfranchised Kahane's voters) in the Knesset of Israel should obviously be added to this article.108.30.240.77 (talk) 09:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 election and Itamar Ben-Gvir 

message: Kahane's view of the Arabs who live in Israel should obviously be added to this article, and Kahane's view was:   Kahane's central claim and view was that the Arabs living in Israel are and will continue to be enemies of Jews and Israel itself.: "every Arab is a proud Arab, a good nationalist. And because of this, he is opposed to the existence of the state of Israel. When the Allies, during World War II, bombed German towns, who did they kill? Women, children... They could only do such a thing because it was a war against the German people. When the Maquis in France took action against the Germans, they didn’t care whether they killed military or civilian Germans - it was war.
War is war. Either you fight or you don’t fight. The ‘Palestinians’, as they call themselves, are enemies of the state of Israel. There will be a perpetual war. With or without Kahane. It’s not Kahane who wants it. It’s because the Arabs believe that the Jews are thieves. I can understand the Arabs’ point of view. It has nothing to do with what the boundaries are. Whether they’re here or there makes no difference. When Israel accepted the 1947 boundary, the Arabs said no. Then the Arabs would not accept the 1949 boundary, and then the 1967 boundary. The Arabs won’t accept any boundary. The Arabs believe that this country belongs to them, and I can understand them. Therefore there will always be war.  There isn’t a country in the world, which has two peoples in it, which has such a demographic distribution, and which has been able to live in peace. Look what’s happening even in those countries where the differences between the two communities are not so great, where, for example, there is only a simple religious difference between Catholic and Protestant Christians. Here we are different from the Arabs in every way. We speak a different language, we have different religions! There’s bound to be a bloody civil war here between those two population groups.  I don’t want to kill any Arab. I want to move them out. I want them to live happily in peace, but not here in Israel. Somewhere else!  What I am concerned about is the survival of the state of Israel as a Jewish state."108.30.240.77 (talk) 11:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kahane's view of the Arabs who live in Israel should be added to article 

message: Please change the misspelled word synagogs in this article sentence, “Kahane publicized his Kahanism ideology through published works, weekly articles, speeches, debates on college campuses and in synagogs throughout the United States” to the proper spelling of synagogues. Thank you. 2601:589:407E:CB0:C006:180B:832:430E (talk) 23:11, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: , Huldra (talk) 23:49, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 29 May 2023 

message: Kach too was recognized as terrorist organization. Mention it. Its crucial 2A02:6680:2102:D89A:11D9:DA18:1F01:DAEE (talk) 23:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  He is a terrorist . Say a terrorist. Convicted for terrorism is a terrorist