lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Internet Content Rating Association

message: The last time I checked their terms of use, they were incompatible with free licensed content (GPL), making ICRA completely useless.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by ArneBab (talk • contribs) 11:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incompatible with free licensing 

message: According to  (Oct 21 2010):
* Upon the recent decision of FOSI's Board of Directors, the ICRA labeling engine has been discontinued. While all current labels will continue to work with Internet content filters, the ICRA label generator, ICRA tools and Webmaster support will no longer be available.
66.11.179.30 (talk) 02:01, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official project tools discontinued 

message: Are there any replacements to ICRA? What, if anything, do major browsers currently support? -- Haravikk (talk) 12:17, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replacements 

message: "parents and other concerned adults make a decision as to what is or is not appropriate for themselves or their children."
Biased. Glorifying censorship. Also, 3 citations? Not good enough.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.85.50.56 (talk) 08:40, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias 

message: The first mention of FOSI in the current page text says "As of October 2010, the ICRA labeling engine has been discontinued by FOSI.  Additionally, FOSI has withdrawn all support for the ICRA rating system" but makes no other mention of FOSI except in some of the footnotes.
The relationship between FOSI and the ICRA should be clearly established before FOSI is cited as discontinuing ICRA.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wfredk (talk • contribs) 03:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation with FOSI is totally unobvious
Talk:Lord of the Isles series

message: This series appears to have zero notability, sadly. The second work in the series, Queen of Demons, may be notable (I've added some reviews) and could serve as a redirect target (we don't have and seems we never had the entry for the first book in the series, Lord of the Isles (novel)?). The third book already seems to fail that (Servant of the Dragon has only one review according to ISFDb), and note I've just prodded The Gods Return, which seems to be the final, 9th volume (We don't have entries on other books in that series; note I intend to prod Servant... in the foreseeable future). Note that the first book (Lord of the Isles) seems to be notable, based on the reviews listed in ISFDb. Perhaps this article could be rescued by being rewritten/refocused from the series to the first volume? @Cunard, @Daranios
PS. ISFDb links: https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/pe.cgi?7511 (series), https://www.isfdb.org/cgi-bin/title.cgi?22053 (first volume) Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:29, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a shame that Google Books hits are generally not accessible, because they seem promising: Preview of Analog Science Fiction & Fact, Vol. 128, p. 138 says "It's easy to see why David Drake's Lord of the Isles series is popular. If you have any taste at all for heroic fantasy, you'll love it." Snippet of Rapport, vol. 20, p. 30 on the Lord of the Isles novel: "One of the most satisfying things about a well-crafte fantasy novel is its ability to carry you off to a world of the writer's own making. While there, you are persuaded to accept the reality of the place; and when the story ends, you may even regret your departure. With this sweeping tour of a magical...". Hard to say more on that. However, Publishers Weekly seems to be a promising source which has short reviews on the individual novels: Lord of the Iles, Servant of the Dragon, ... (Might push novels with so far only one review over the notability threshold...)  So presumably the series article could function as a collective place to collect relevant content from secondary sources when the books individually are not notable in accordance with WP:MERGEREASON no. 3 and WP:CSC. Sorry, no more time look into this more deeply. Daranios (talk) 09:39, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Rob Norris

message: The section on 'controversies' merely re-states information that is already in the main article, where it is contextualized. What is the value in having a separate section highlighting this incident again? It should be noted that previous versions of the article had a controversies section before information under the heading was integrated with the main article; the controversies section was since re-inserted. Other justin (talk) 18:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies section 

message: 2003 Provincial Campaign Results are missing from info boxes at bottom of article 2607:FEA8:BE21:A100:90E6:87D7:FF35:F78B (talk) 00:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electoral Record
Talk:Rob Powell

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Because he was the head coach of a Super League club.) --Fleets (talk) 07:48, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: This article/page has multiple missing citations. WikiHuman2021 (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple missing citations
Talk:Robbie Patton

message: I'm not sure if any of this should be in the article, but I thought it'd be good to preserve it somewhere with Robbie Patton information.
On a YouTube upload of "Smiling Islands", Gary Wisner made this comment in 2020:
  "I was the Atlantic rep who finally convinced the label to put this out as a single. I had already gotten a bunch of stations playing it. First they had to get approval from Nicks, then she or her record co. (Modern) wouldn't allow her name to be put on the label. By the friggin' time we got the single out it had already peaked at my stations and was basically "dead in the water". I was convinced then and I'm still convinced this should have been a hit!!!!"
The album was released in July 1982. Stevie was not just singing backup - she sang lead on two verses. The single didn't hit Billboard's charts until March 1983. PatConolly (talk) 17:19, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Smiling Islands" release
Talk:Egotistico Fantastico

message: Has it actually been proven that Egotistico Fantastico is the same guy who wrestles as "Cyon" in the NWA? Theotherchairduck (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 18:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identity
Talk:Robert Aymar

message: Citations should now be OK.
Bibliophilen (talk) 20:55, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation improved 
Talk:Three Departments and Six Ministries

message: :« The head of the Secretariat or the Department of State Affairs was generally referred to as the Chancellor, next only to the emperor in rank and power. »
Possible meaining :
* They were them too called "Chancellor" ;
* They were called Chancellor (-> so how is called the head of the Chancellery ? O.o)
220.135.4.212 (talk) 12:13, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I did not write this article, a fellow editor of mine did in collaboration with the Ming Dynasty article that I brought to FA status. However, I think what it is saying is that the head of the Secretariat could be called chancellor, but so could the head of the Department of State Affairs. The designation of "chancellor" is simply the person with the highest position in government, which in this case can be either the head of the Secretariat or the Department of State Affairs.--Pericles of AthensTalk 15:26, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's a confusing issue because Chancellor or Chief Councillor can either refer to as a specific post, or as a generic name to the highest official in court. In some dynasties when they had the post, it was usually taken by the head of the Secretariat or the Department of State Affairs. In some dynasties when they did not, the highest civil official (usually either the head of the Secretariat or the Department of State Affairs, or as in Ming, the Grand Secretary) was referred to as the Chancellor. Josuechan (talk) 00:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  What [does it] mean ? 

message: here and at the pages for the Six Ministries:
* 1
* 2
 — LlywelynII 05:58, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources for future article expansion

message: Correct me if I'm wrong, but 秘书 literally translates to secret books but is currently (and probably formerly) used to describe a librarian, bookkeeper, scribe or secretary (notetaker). Thus, is the translation correct? Augend (drop a line) 21:11, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "秘书" and relevant English
Talk:Malingo

message: This appears to be the only character with a separate page from the main article.  The details don't seem to justify this.Tbennert (talk) 03:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say merge it too, as much as I like Abarat.  This page obviously doesn't get much upkeep (it doesn't even have a "this is a stub" notice at the bottom" and it'd be better to wait until the end more books have come out when we can gauge which characters deserve their own pages or not. --LoganTheGeshrat (talk) 04:30, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Robert Giroux

message: Though in the linked document, her middle name is spelled NATIKA, it actually was NATICA. She was named for her cousin Natica, Lady Lister-Kaye.204.126.251.199 (talk) 20:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wife's name 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:23, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Robert Hass

message: The link to Lew Welch's page suggests that "Raid Kills Bugs Dead" is neither a short poem, nor unquestionably the product of Welch's work as an advertising copywriter. Although the source interviewer describes the phrase as "a modern classic," the interviewer appears to be having a bit of a giggle, as they say. 173.8.183.37 (talk) 18:26, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lew Welch
Talk:Mark Dimond

message: Wow...i have been pronouncing his name like "dee-mond", i see i was quite wrong. :P  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rohan2116 (talk • contribs) 20:50, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oh really?! 

message: Courtney and Mark live in a bank vauly?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.154.146.25 (talk) 11:05, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Courtney and Mark
Talk:Robert Holden (author)

message: I certainly do not have any criticism of Robert Holden, but I fear this article reads very much like a puff piece, containing no objective input about him.  It reads as though it were written by the PR bureau of his publisher -- which it very well may have been.  Wiki fund-raises from the general public, and should not merely be a source of free publicity for an individual who garners considerable income from books, "programmes" and public speaking. NaySay (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit unbalanced?
Talk:Robert J. Kelleher

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Robert Joseph Kelleher was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 02:18, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. --TommyBoy (talk) 04:32, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Robert Melee

message: Mangalore village is located in Tittakudi Tehsil of Cuddalore district in Tamil Nadu, India. It is situated 30km away from sub-district headquarter Tittakudi and 100km away from district headquarter Cuddalore. As per 2009 stats, Mangalur is the gram panchayat of Mangalore village. Manishankar1997 (talk) 13:35, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mangalur 606108 

message: Taluk : veppur Manishankar1997 (talk) 13:50, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taluk : veppur
Talk:Robert Moreland

message: What about Robert Edward Moreland, screen writer and writer of the new movie Space Chimps?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.59.1 (talk) 23:04, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are several possible candidates - the founder of a charity ahttps://register-of-charities.charitycommission.gov.uk/charity-search/-/charity-details/24994 this] and a clockmaker, but not the modern DJ person. Jackiespeel (talk) 16:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  George Cockle
Talk:Przemysław Frasunek

message: I'm convinced this person isn't notable, to the degree required by WP:N.
I'm giving this page another week, from today, and then I'm going to propose deletion, and, if necessary, submit it to AfD. If reliable sources are added between now and then, of course I'll leave the article alone.
--- tqbf 01:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleting this article
Talk:Robert R. Cupp

message: Just a little reminder. Campaign websites are not valid sources for information.  Please follow NPOV rules.
I would like to also remind people that vandalizing Wikipedia in favor of the campaign of a person you support is more likely to hurt them than help them, as people tend to judge candidates based on the actions of their supporters.--Robert Wm "Ruedii" (talk) 18:18, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Campaign websites are not NPOV sources 
Talk:Yugtun script

message: At the link I added, it says, 
:The Alaska script was created by Charley Krerruertsaun around 1909 in Quigillingoq (near Kuskokvim Bay, west coast of Alaska)
and 
:A syllabary created by Isaak (also known as "Kiatuak" by his Inuit name) around 1909 in Quigilingoq, west coast of Alaska
I've always heard the Uyaquk story myself. kwami (talk) 15:00, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  added
Talk:Roberto Pagdanganan

message: I added 2 links to show the great tragedy in his life: triple election loss, his own, his brother's, and his son's; and death of his son and murder of his brother. His son, Raymond Pagdanganan, 26, died of internal hemorrhage, due to a vehicular accident on January 21, 2007 along MacArthur Highway, Malolos, Bulacan.abs-cbnnews.com,  Vilma on ‘wait-and-see’ mode After he lost the 2007 Bulacan, gubernatorial race, his brother, who also lost the Calumpit mayoralty race, was gunned down on May 4, 2008, in Calumpit. The Philippine National Police (PNP) ordered full security for Roberto Pagdanganan.  gmanews.tv/story,  PNP orders full security for ex-Bulacan governor --Florentino floro (talk) 08:50, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Triple tragedies
Talk:Primary Atomic Reference Clock in Space

message: Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving. -- Yamara 15:04, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Robin Llwyd ab Owain

message: I've carried out some edits today to improve the article and have trawled through for better references than some of the ones that were being used. I believe I have done enough to be able to remove the "multiple issues" tag. This is a difficult one, as the subject of the article is a Wikipedian, and one well-known to many contributors, even though he no longer edits the English-language Wikipedia. I have met him in person (only once) and have had personal correspondence with him, but I do not know him outside a Wikipedia context. As a chaired bard, he qualifies in notability terms, and one of my main interests is in improving the coverage of Wales-related subjects within Wikipedia. I would welcome input from other contributors less closely connected with the subject. Deb (talk) 11:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2022
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Wikipedia policies and guidelines/Userbox content

message: I'm still unsure on whether we should follow the "endorse/oppose this summary" format, or just have threaded discussions. Any suggestions? - Mtmelendez (Talk) 15:08, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes it hard to reply with neutral or opposing comments. Adding neutral/oppose subsections to each summary would be impractical. I'd say we could leave the separate summaries, just lose the "I endorse" subsections and allow free discussion below each summary. Equazcion •✗/C • 15:13, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. - Mtmelendez (Talk) 16:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  I don't see what's done, but ok :) Equazcion •✗/C • 16:15, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)

text:  K, now I do :) Equazcion •✗/C • 16:16, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, got momentarily busy with something else in between editing. :) - Mtmelendez (Talk) 16:18, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page format

message: I've posted a wikiquette alert at WP:WQA#User:WebHamster. I've never done one of these before so I don't know what exactly happens next, but there it is. Equazcion •✗/C • 20:33, 17 Jan 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiquette alert for [[User:WebHamster]] 

message: What exactly do people think to gain from this discussion? >Radiant< 23:57, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Some sort of fair consensus on how to handle this issue, maybe? This user feels the status quo is flawed. -- Kendrick7talk 00:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Kendrick summed it up. It doesn't hurt to have a centralized good-faithed discussion on hot topics every once in a while, does it? - Mtmelendez (Talk) 01:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hm. 

message: Can someone summarize the history of the issue?  Not the particular MfD that got us here but the history of userbox deletions and POV in userspace.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 03:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ooops, I guess you're doing this in the Project Space not the talk space, the link posted on MfD's talk took me here.  Guess I better do some reading.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 03:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summary?
Talk:Rod Beckstrom

message: why wasn't he on wikinews for resigning?Smallman12q (talk) 00:40, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  resigned 

message: This "law" is absolute and utter nonsense, no economist in his right mind would ever propose such a useless abstraction. With all respect for people positing laws named after themselves, there should at least be a hint to this fact in the article. Mbaer3000 (talk) 09:13, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Doesn't this belong on Talk:Beckstrom's law? --Alvestrand (talk) 10:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

text: Yeah, right. Sorry, I hadn't known this thing has it's own entry. Mbaer3000 (talk) 13:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beckstrom's Law 

message: Alvestrand has added  to the section of quotes, and correctly notes that quotes should be sourced or deleted. I see that the quotes are from the pdf press release in ref [23] "ICANN (June 26, 2009). 'Internet Security Expert Named ICANN CEO'", however I don't know what to do about them. They are not very encyclopedic in style (indeed, they are direct from a gushing press release), so I'm inclined to heavily prune them, perhaps keeping only the most notable quote and including it in the first paragraph of the "Appointment to ICANN" section (which would then just be a couple of sentences). Johnuniq (talk) 10:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to make it clear that the quotes are from the press release - see if this works. That is, if they are needed at all. --Alvestrand (talk) 20:24, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noted quotes about this appointment 
Talk:Rod Benson

message: Rod Benson started the Boom Tho Movement and it shoud be included in his write-up..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.99.190 (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. - Goo Paine (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rod Clements

message: Would it be appropriate to add "Bass Guitar" and "violin" to his list of instruments, as this is what he played in Lindisfarne, arguably the most successful part of his career.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.63.208 (talk) 21:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rod Cross

message: Do we really need an article on a retired physicist???--Jack Upland (talk) 11:07, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Especially one that suddenly became an expert in Motion Mechanics on his retirement.-Brucestarkey (talk) 11:36, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  This talk thread is quite old, but it should be noted that he is well know and respected for his work (inc. books and published papers) in the field of Sports Mechanics, especially sports that include swing and spin dynamics like as Baseball, Golf, and Tennis. Rather than deletion, I suggest that the article is expanded to include a section on this aspect of his research. The Rhyme Animal (talk) 10:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Delete? 

message: It seems as though the subject of this article may have had a hand in writing it. Interlaker (talk) 23:39, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion seems to have become dormant. I move that the Neutrality banner be removed. The article itself is doesn't strike me as not neutral since it only covers his participation in a court hearing as expert witness, and this is presented with both his contribution to the hearing as well as a public critique of this contribution. Seems pretty neutral. The Rhyme Animal (talk) 11:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Rod Keenan

message: I have some familiarity with this milliner, yet cannot locate references off or online.  Please assist in improving this article to prove claims noted.  Thank you. Tinkerbell1989 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 04:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Whatever the case, the way you went about adding so many citation notices is not productive. One at the end of the sentence is enough.208.54.86.154 (talk) 03:59, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poorly Referenced