Talk:List of Intel Pentium 4 processors

message: I don't know what the preference would be, but that column needs to either be fixed or removed. The few prices listed are not the release price; they're the final price. The pricing on Ark, used to justify those prices, is adjusted throughout the life of the processor; it shows either the current bulk (tray of 1000) price for processors still in production, or the final bulk (tray of 1000) price for processors that are out of production.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrPizza (talk • contribs) 17:39, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Price 

message: Should the Pentium 4 stuff from Intel processor confusion be moved into here?  That'd mean adding additional columns for the fab technology, power, presence of EIST, presence of EM64T support, presence of XD bit, hyperthreading support, and virtualization (or perhaps with all the various technologies given as a list of items).  If all the stuff from that page is moved into x86 processor list pages, that page could be removed. Guy Harris 21:40, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and it's been done. Guy Harris 02:01, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging [[Intel processor confusion]] into this 

message: Hi!
Im not used to editing wikipages so if someone could add RK80532PC072512 SL7EY to the list? Its a 2.8 GHz 400 FSB P4 and the fastest 400 FSB cpu available. More info at Intel http://processorfinder.intel.com/details.aspx?sSpec=SL7EY
/Thomas —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.216.134.192 (talk) 17:21, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Processor missing in list 

message: Apparently, there may exist a 3.0GHz 400MHz FSB Northwood CPU, being faster than the believed to be fastest 400MHz FSB Pentium4 CPU rated at 2.8GHz.
http://cgi.ebay.com/RARE-INTEL-PENTIUM-4-P4-3-0-512-400-SL74Q-2-8Ghz-SL7EY_W0QQitemZ270156442588QQcmdZViewItem
It's s-spec is SL74Q which does turn up some hits on Google. Nothing on Intel's site though. Maybe it was a very short lived and change of plans processor. I won't add it in myself since it's just an eBay link and a rumor as proof, but I'm tossing this out there since I've heard much about it. The guys at the Dell forums have loosely referenced that CPU ocassionaly, sinc ealot of people with old socket 478 Dell's would come in asking for the maximum upgrade possible.
http://www.dellcommunity.com/supportforums/search?submitted=true&type=message&q=3GHz+400FSB&page_size=10&x=0&y=0
If that link fails to work right, on Dell's forums, search for the phrase "3GHz 400FSB" exactly (without the quotes).  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.30.238.96 (talk) 20:46, August 20, 2007 (UTC) 
:what about this processor: http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=27441 . is it also missing? 79.209.74.185 (talk) 23:35, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  To the second editor, that is already listed on this page under the SL6D8 sSpec. — Aluvus t/c 02:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Missing Processor 

message: This article states that the Pentium-4 541 supports Intel EM64T (64-bit computing). But this  spec from Intel states otherwise. Problem is, I've seen a boxed CPU of this type and the Labeling stated that it supported EM64T. Who is correct? And are there any other such CPU models that come with this confusion? --124.43.228.59 15:19, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Intel is prone to typos from time to time, all 5x1 sequence processors support extended memory 64 technology.Coldpower27 15:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  EM64T Confusion 

message: I could find no evidence that D0 Cedar Mills (6x1 with spec-numbers SL9K*) support Intel's VT-x, so I edited the wiki page and deleted the line stating this.  Was I wrong?
Iulianv (talk) 11:07, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  VT-x on Cedar Mills 

message: I know, that Intel list the Gallatin-based Extreme Editions with "2 MB L2" Cache (an without any L3) nowadays, but virtually every source I could find, that is older then Intels page-revamp (the one, that removed the old CPU-spec finder), list this Core with 0,5 MiB L2 and 2 MiB L3. This includes numerous articles and tests from Gallatins introduction as well, as my CPU-Z on my own rig.
This also includes this article up to the 15th September 2009: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Intel_Pentium_4_microprocessors&oldid=314180350
Then someone simply deleted the L2-column:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_Intel_Pentium_4_microprocessors&oldid=314180828
And still sometime later, the L3.column got renamed to "L2".
I'm not an active Wiki-author, but I strongly suggest to everyone keeping this page up to date, that the P4EE-section is returned to the state before 15th Sept 2009, when it was (imho) right.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.96.171.236 (talk) 19:32, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probably wrong P4EE entries - for nearly two years?? 

message: Would it be possible to use another column or something similar to use pictures from Wikimedia Common's Category:Pentium 4 as a thumbnails as a good picture reference? Rjluna2 (talk) 12:43, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Pentium 4 Microprocessor Pictures into these Listing? 

message: Wouldn't it be helpful, if we list the socket? At least for the Prescottmodels, which were avaiable for Socket 478 and Socket 775? And sorry for my bad english. --176.2.104.199 (talk) 18:58, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listing Sockets? 

message: Hi, I have a processor that's not listed on the page. Its says:
Intel '01
Pentium 4
2.53GHZ/512/533
SL6PD Costa Rica
3336A636
And below, next to the QR code,
4346B047
0661
Here is a picture I took, you're welcome to use it in whatever way is helpful to wikipedia: https://i.imgur.com/biLDFXV.jpg
It and the motherboard were part of a dell pre-built system that's going back to the recycling center now.
68.106.226.57 (talk) 22:48, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing processor SL6PD