Talk:Slaanesh

message: I don't really see what's POV about this article. You should elaborate when you put on a tag like that, as it's not really obvious, at least to me. --Keolah 03:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV? 

message: I've once again removed the link to The Demonic Legion from this article. In terms of Warhammer and Warhammer 40K, a site with 461 registered members on its forum is nowhere near notable, unless I'm missing something here. Cheers --Pak21 08:39, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very good. Now, could you please provide a verifiable source for that claim, in accordance with policy? --Pak21 07:34, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Let's try a slightly different Google: "slaanesh forum", as that's the article you're adding this (very badly formatted) link to. Top hits are Citadel of Delights, Bolter and Chainsword, Librarium Online, CGChannel and Gnutella. I couldn't see The Demonic Legion anywhere on the list. Similar results are seen for the other Chaos gods. --Pak21 08:50, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

text: Let's find out what other people think... --Pak21 08:20, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Demonic Legion 

message: Keep or remove The Daemonic Legion link from the Khorne, Nurgle, Slaanesh and Tzeentch pages? Add Keep or Remove with an optional one-sentence explanation. Sign with --~~~. Poll closes 08:17, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Daemonic Legion Straw poll

message: In my understanding- and I am researching now for confirmation- the DE use torture as a means of holding off Slaanesh's embrace. --Grant McKenna 18:43, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, sort of; they sacrifice other races' souls so that they are consumed rather than the DE; it seems to me that torturing them first is just to basically tenderize them for the Great Enemy (as well as for fun).  Check out the "Torturer's Tale"; Asdrubael Vect hints at it there but doesn't outright state it.  I googled the story just now and found this this copy on the GW website. Cheers --DarthBinky 00:08, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Slaanesh and Dark Eldar

message: Should the icon associated with Slaanesh, such as the examples found here (http://uk.games-workshop.com/hordesofchaos/slaanesh/images/cult-icon.jpg) and here (http://stormofchaos.uk.games-workshop.com/book/images/slaanesh_icon.gif) be added to this page? 66.24.236.62 17:07, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As that image isn't a free image, I'm personally not too bothered about it. Cheers --Pak21 10:09, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Icon 

message: Part of the article seem taken from .
The copied part seem appear prior in signaled page that in wiki history . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.221.101.218 (talk) 11:58, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem? 

message: Just as Birth of the Chaos Gods discussion in this page stated, Slaanesh is the only god whose birth is explained. However, it's obvously lacking in Slaanesh's page. Could someone post it, as it's birth is a pivotal moment for the Eldar history and thus the Warhammer timeline. Also, Slaanesh is gender ambigous as the Warhammer 40k universe has obviously and painstakingly made sure since he defies natural order, I suppose we should lose the gender bias and make it ambigous as well. After all, if the Eldar calls him, "She who thirsts", they must consider him female.
Slaanesh is the diety of pleasure in all of its forms, conventional and perverse. Pleasure is known to all mortals regardless of gender, and therefor it may be wise to consider Slaanesh as being both male and female.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.13.5.6 (talk) 16:57, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gender Ambiguity and Lack of Origin