lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Joseph Richard Asiedu

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "hughes" :
** http://www.parliament.gh/leadershipdetails.php?id=0003
** 
DumZiBoT (talk) 21:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references !
Talk:Carole Hersee

message: I disagree with one statement in this article, "the x on the blackboard marks the exact center" as it doesn't. If you edit the picture and draw lines through the centers and through the X they're off. Should this be changed? I know the item is referenced, but this doesn't make it correct.
Brinh123 (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is. See Test Card F. --Ef80 (talk) 10:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Information not correct

message: I did a search and was directed to a YouTube clip of the test card and within moments knew the name of the "test card girl" only a question I'd had for 42 years!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.74.157.29 (talk) 17:14, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  the amazing www 
Talk:Marshall Hall, Maryland

message: The two are distinct (Bryan's Road, unincorporated, is on the top of the hill, a few miles away, Marshall Hall is in the river bottomland). Tedickey (talk) 10:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bryan's Road 

message: The available (verifiable) sources agree that the park was started in the 1880s, and that jousting as a park activity is no older than that (likely 1885).  See for example
* CH-54
* Maryland Carousel
* Marshall Hall Amusement Park (photo gallery)
* Mount Vernon
TEDickey (talk) 23:13, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, then you might consider providing "plenty" of links to the verifiable sources.  I found none. TEDickey (talk) 10:30, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  date of park
Talk:TO-3

message: Does anyone knows wahat is the thermal resistance caspule to air? All datasheetes i've seen give only the Rjc
Does anyone think D2PAK should be replaced with the more common TO-263 designation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.180.8.80 (talk) 19:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please would someone knowledgeable add the dimensions to these transistor package articles ?
It has been said before, but its about time all these TO-... pages were combined into one. Darkman101 (talk) 08:11, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dimensions ? 

message: I made a picture of a LM12 power opamp next to a 2N3055. The LM12 has 4 pins plus the case in a TO-3 package.
But wiki insists I wait 4 days before I can upload pictures.
Just saying.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heroic Ubernerd (talk • contribs) 00:02, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  i wanna help but... 
Talk:Punjabi wedding traditions

message: I do not believe that this page belongs under the category of "Hindu Marriages" as  the Punjabi "Lavan" at its fundamental is marked by the four walks around the SGGS. Hindu Marriages Traditions are limited to 7 chakars around Agni. Because of this fundamental difference, Punjabi Wedding Traditions should be in its own category.
Singh 08:36, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification of Wedding Rituals 

message: y do we make da bride n groom wear KANGNA at their mehendi?? wats da reason behind it??  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.167.125.216 (talk) 18:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  traditions 

message: *Sikh invitations by which invites their guests
*http://www.indiaparenting.com/occasions/345_3619/punjabi-wedding-customs.html
*http://www.nikhilbhide-theweddingplanner.com/marriage-rituals-in-india/punjabi-marriage-rituals.html
*http://www.a2zweddingcards.com/sikh-wedding-invitations
*http://weddings.iloveindia.com/punjabi-wedding/wedding-rituals.html
*http://www.shaadi-direct.com/languagematrimonials/punjabi.htm
Looks like a lot of advertising and reference spam. Given we've no references, are some suitable to use until we find something better? --Ronz (talk) 18:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from references

message: In which chandu landed by wearing english shoes 106.78.61.168 (talk) 08:39, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  English 

message: This article contains no citations. Please try to get some reliable ones. ਗਿਆਨੀ ਪੁਰਸ਼ (talk) 14:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Citations.
Talk:One-Million-Liter Test Sphere

message: The article makes passing reference to volunteers: "Human volunteers breathed metered aerosols"
Is there any more information about this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.180.14.200 (talk) 03:20, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: See Operation Whitecoat. 140.139.35.250 (talk) 20:32, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Volunteers" ?
Talk:Ina Ray Hutton

message: Someone removed the section pertaining to the question of Hutton's ancestry.  I'm restoring it with some editing and using the reference that already appears in the reference table.  There may be some controversy about this, but it merits mention.  Tmangray (talk) 03:53, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Race 

message: I would like to see some comments about whether Hollywoodland Forever is a reliable source. It's a blogspot site and usually blogs are considered unreliable unless they are written by established critics.–Vmavanti (talk) 18:59, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Template talk:Royal Navy

message: The royal marines are clearly part of the royal navy 
:All are correctly part of the Naval Service, or in Layman's (but technically incorrect) terms, the Royal Navy, as per the original version. Emoscopes Talk 20:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: See Naval Service, referenced from BR 1806, a bible for such matters. If you look through internal [publications], 'Naval Service' is the term that is used. Officially, and correctly, the Royal Navy and the Royal Marines are both component parts of the Naval Service, see here for a good example. Admittedly 'Naval Service' is not a commonly used term, but it is technically incorrect to say that the Royal Marines is a lower hierarchical component of the Royal Navy. I do not think the Layman's FAQ that you point to is reasonable grounds for making it so. Emoscopes Talk 23:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the UK Defence Statistics glossary, here, the Naval Service is the Royal Navy and Royal Marines combined, and the Royal Marines are (I quote), Sea-going soldiers who are part of the Naval Service. The Royal Marines are not a constituent part of the Royal Navy, rather, both are constituent parts of the Naval Service Emoscopes Talk 12:42, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Royal Marines
Talk:Percy Wenrich

message: Hi FloridaArmy You'll notice I removed duplicate content. Usually in an article this size (stub-class), the next bit of information to include in the lead is what the person is notable for. In this case it would read: "He is best known for writing the hit song Moonlight Bay". If the article is substantial enough, then certain points can be highlighted in the lead. Since this article is not substantial, the reader can immediately find all pertinent information in the one section Personal life and career directly below. Thus, no need to include duplicate content. Thanks! PS I would be in favor of adding what Wenrich is best known for (Moonlight Bay) in the lead. Maineartists (talk) 13:55, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead is too short and doesn't summarize what he is known for. What is in the opening paragraphs is always expanded on in following sections. FloridaArmy (talk) 13:59, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @FloridaArmy The lead is not too short for an article this size. It summarizes perfectly what he is known for in regards to what the article states. The WP:Onus to include accompanying and writing for his "non-notable" singer wife has not been proven. In addition: "The lead is too short and doesn't summarize what he is known for" - again, yes it does: "was an American composer of ragtime and popular music." That being said, there is nothing of notable substance to glean this particular bit of content (2 short sentences) and place it in the lead outside of any other content; considering The Lambs Club, Songwriters on Parade etc are notable links and are not mentioned in the lead. Gain consensus first, please, before reinstating. Thanks. Speaking strictly grammar, this: "He wrote for and accompanied his singer wife Dolly Connolly on tour" is not good writing. Maineartists (talk) 20:01, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  1) His wife is definitely notable. 2) They performed together, she was already a star before they met 3) The lead doesn't summarize the main aspects of his life and notoriety 4) He wrote songs for his wife and she was a big part of his life and career performing as an accompaniest. Not worth wasting time going back and forth with one side spouting a lack of knowledge of Wikipedia policies and insisting on falsities. Have a nice day. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:25, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I will work on expanding the article to satisfy a lengthier lead. At present, it just does not afford such liberties similar to Al Dubin, Spencer Williams, Edward Madden, etc. If you believe his wife is notable, write an article on her. Just saying she is notable doesn't make her so at WP. By your list of reasons for inclusion, a persuasive argument could be made as well for Madden: his longtime lyricist who penned many hit songs with Wenrich. Inclusion should not be subjective but based on substantial content within the article. Maineartists (talk) 23:54, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead
Talk:List of Brandy & Mr. Whiskers episodes

message: I plan on redirecting these per WP:EPISODE soon. Information from multiple secondary sources must be present for a single episode to need an article. This includes reception and development. Single plot summaries and trivia don't make a substantial article. I suggest Wikia and tv.com as alternate venues for this information. TTN 18:06, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Single episodes

message: All of the episodes of this series fail the notability guidelines for television episodes. The way for these articles to be improved is through the inclusion of real-world information from reliable sources to assert notability. That is unlikely to happen, and these only contain overly long plot summaries, trivia, and quotes. Per that, they need to be a small part of this list. If there are no objections, these will be redirected soon. TTN 21:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I object.  Please use the Wikipedia:Television episodes/Review process. - Peregrine Fisher 05:44, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode notability
Talk:Visual voicemail

message: Klausner Technologies, Inc has posted a ad on elance.com looking for someone to puff up the article: . It advertises, asking for 5 sources and 5 pictures, including its own press releases. Please be alert for individuals editing on behalf of this corp. and would such individuals please be sure to read WP:PEW. Thank you! Phearson (talk) 05:41, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paid Editor Alert! 

message: What does "random access" in "random access voicemail" mean? Can we either get a source to support this or a clarification of what this means?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.157.95.102 (talk) 04:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random access voicemail 

message: I worked at SGI and they had an online system that you could use to manage your messages, and you could do so using the phone too. I don't think the iPhone was the first in any way.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidmaxwaterman (talk • contribs) 11:49, 18 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  I remember using 'Visual Voice Mail' in the '90s
Template talk:West Bank Labelled Map

message: The map shows the West Bank using two colors -- yellow and green. It would appear that green indicates territory of formal PA control, but the PA has no control over any part of East Jerusalem as far as I know. Could somebody clarify this? --Doron 22:38, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What do the colors mean? 

message: Ariel was put back on the map based on regional significance not on population. If this is to judge what goes on the map, then should Salfit (10,000) and Tubas (16,000) be added because of their positions as district centers or governorate capitals? --Al Ameer son (talk) 04:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd add Tubas, not sure about Salfit, which is small to the extreme (less than 10,000) and located right beside Ariel, which would make it practically difficult to include (many world atlases omit cities due to proximity to other cities on certain scales). -- Ynhockey (Talk) 09:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

text: Would just like to add that being a capital of a country subdivision does not necessarily declare a form of significance, because it's mostly a bureacratic thing (often left untouched for decades or more) and may be out of touch with reality. A good example is Ramla being the capital of the Center District of Israel. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 09:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

text: I have added Tubas. -- Ynhockey (Talk) 21:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Locality significance
Template talk:West Bank sidebar

message: The map implies that parts of East Jerusalem are somehow subordinated to the Palestinian Authority (presumably marked green), which is not true, as far as I know.--Doron 10:04, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  East Jerusalem 

message: The map does not display properly in IE 8. Usually I just get a blank space. 86.134.10.88 (talk) 23:24, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a similar-sounding issue mentioned at Template_talk:Location_map#Map_does_not_work_properly_in_IE. I'm not sure if it's ultimately the same cause or something different. 86.146.46.169 (talk) 00:21, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map is broken in IE 

message: See Talk:West_Bank#request_for_change for request for better image. Sean.hoyland - talk 08:05, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: West_Bank#request_for_change
Talk:Infrared astronomy

message: A more meaningful wavelength division between visible and infrared observations is 1 μm, the red limit for the silicon detectors used for optical observations. Korandder (talk) 08:56, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ALMA is a radio telescope not infrared surely ? - Rod57 (talk) 19:45, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed ALMA image as irrelevant 

message: Could also mention astronomical use of Edisons Tasimeter in 1878 The Astronomical register 1878 p309 - Rod57 (talk) 23:52, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could mention tasimeter in History 

message: Article Evaluation on "Infrared Astronomy"
Everything in the article is relevent to infrared astronomy. It begins with the origins of infrared radiation when scientist William Herschel performed an experiment in 1800 where he placed a thermometer in sunlight of different colors after passing it through a prism. He realized that the different colors of light were different temperatures, the highest temperature being outside the visible spectrum just beyond the red color. The article goes down the timeline of infrared astronomy by explaining various inventions that helped kickstart the field all while staying relevent to the topic.
The article mentions modern advancements in the field as well as new infrared telescopes that were built within a the past ten years. This prevents the article from being out of date.
There exists no bias in the article. It is an informative article that provides a clear timeline of how the field of infrared astronomy came to be and what it is now.
All the links embedded in the citations within the article seem to work. Each citation goes directly to a wikipedia page that thoroughly talks about the subject the citation came from. However, there does seem to be a lot of information that wasn't cited. For example, the entire 'History' section only has six citations despite the fact that this section contains the most amount of information within the wikipedia article. The section starts off by explaining how infrared radiation was discovered without even citing any sources. The citations that are included are not biased and includes a lot of important information relating to infrared astronomy.
The talk page, unfortunately, isn't populated with any conversations. It is a rather short page that only contains a few questions to spark a conversation. The questions included: "What makes infrared astronomy different and useful compared to other types of astronomy? What can an astronomer see from infrared radiation versus other types of radiation." However, no one seemed to answer the questions.
Havelr (talk) 20:45, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Evaluation
Talk:Ultraviolet astronomy

message: It would be great if the list of satellites could be made into a table to include the UV wavelength range and dates of the start and end of operation. - Rod57 (talk) 09:40, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Which are imaging (many filters?), which are spectrographic ? Could do dates using timeline scripts - and another for wavelengths of current telescopes ? Eg from Hubble Space Telescope :
- Rod57 (talk) 06:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  More details in satellite list 

message: It's hard to see what overlap in functionality they have, eg was it a major loss when GALEX was retired, and do the HST instruments (at any time since 1990 launch) have overlap with other telescopes ? Is HST UV still not replaced - for US, or by any ? - Rod57 (talk) 06:10, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which of the listed telescopes have new or unique capabilities
Talk:Visible-light astronomy

message: This article should be expanded.  Some of the things that should be included should be what optical astronomy can and cannot see, the various types of telescopes for optical astronomy, and some history on the origins of optical astronomy (including notable figures).  70.252.81.84 (talk) 16:21, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Some expansion has occurred due to improvement to the sky article.  I do not plan to go much further in this article's development.  Hopefully, the improvement will inspire someone else to continue the work.  Thegreatdr (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm planning on doing some work on this article. As suggested above, I was thinking I'd add types of telescopes, what optical astronomy can and can't see, and maybe expand on some history on optical telescopes and/or visible-light astronomy in general. As for types of telescopes, I'll probably briefly cover them in a similar way it was covered in Optical_telescope. Here are some sources I'm looking to use: Elert, Glenn. "The Electromagnetic Spectrum, The Physics Hypertextbook". Hypertextbook.com., History_of_astronomy and History_of_the_telescope for some general history on visible-light astronomy, especially since early astronomy was visible-light based. I plan on expanding this list but that's what I have so far. Feel free to suggest more sources. OdellZ17 (talk) 04:48, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand
Talk:Mae Murray

message: This was in front of bio text:
:Mae Murray was her actual name. Murray was born in Ireland. The bio that has her named, "Marie Adrienne Koenig" and being born in Virginia was put together by MGM Studios to make her sound more "American Starlet" like. She was an Irish farmgirl.
Could be true due to Hollywood image-making, but has no supporting citation and conflicts with referenced material. 110.32.252.249 (talk) 00:12, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  dodgy addition 

message: I see no citation for this film being “critically panned”. The review in the New York Times (Mordaunt Hall, May 18, 1931) is positive, not glowing, but nothing like being panned. Please fix or cite the panning. Rkolian (talk) 21:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bachelor Apartment
Talk:Diaoyucheng

message: Quite a few websites say that Mongke died of disease. It is difficult to find sites that say he died by cannon fire. Can someone provide a source for his having died by cannon fire?
Bathrobe 05:06, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The death of Mongke

message: Titles of this kind ("Scourge of God") are usually meat to refer to Attila or Genghis Khan or Timur. Unless someone puts in citations for Möngke being yet another person with such a nickname, I am going to remove the relevant statements. Yaan (talk) 13:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whip of God 

message: The name should be "Diaoyu Fortress" instead of a town. The word "cheng" here means fortress, not a city.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.255.198.204 (talk) 11:49, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Mr. Ho

message: Hello, I saw your recent retarget of this page and was wondering if you could give some explanation for why this needs to be done. I may just not understand what this term's connotation is, but to me it seems that the previous redirect was more appropriate, because someone typing the name Mr. Ho is probably looking for a person (Akira Toriyama) not their theater (Akira Toriyama's Manga Theater). Is there something I'm missing? Thanks, Gluons12 ☢|☕ 02:38, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Mr. Ho is not a real-life person, it is a short manga written by Akira Toriyama. The story was later collected into the second volume of Akira Toriyama's Manga Theater, a series collecting many of his short stories. While the story is not notable enough for its own article, the Manga Theater collection is and I'm in the process of improving that article. So rather than redirecting to the person who wrote Mr. Ho, it is better to redirect to the article for a book it was published in that will eventually include more info about it. Xfansd (talk) 03:13, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, this redirect is probably more appropriate. Gluons12 ☢|☕ 12:27, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  On recent retargeting
Talk:Mugen Spiral

message: * IGN
* Mania.com
* Monsters and Critics (unusual)
* Comic Book Bin
* The Malaysian Star
-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:18, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Comics Worth Reading --KrebMarkt 19:40, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

text: ANN right Turn only vol. 1-2 --KrebMarkt 16:06, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews 

message: The mangaka's name links to Onegai Teacher's Mizuho Kusanagi.  Either the name should not be wikified or a page should be created for the mangaka, however I am not sure which (and do not know enough about the mangaka to create a page on her.)  How might I correct this?
Deathagent (talk) 03:07, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've delinked it. Seems unlikely she is notable. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Mangaka Link 
Talk:Muhyo & Roji's Bureau of Supernatural Investigation

message: Here are some reviews for use in the reception section:
* Vol 2, ANN
* Vol 2, Manga Life
* Vol 4, Comic Book Bin
* Vol 6, ANN
* Vol 17, Mania.com
-- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 01:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reception
Talk:Mission House (Stockbridge, Massachusetts)

message: The article says 1739, whereas the external link says ca. 1742. Where did the 1739 date come from? - Dunc0029 (talk) 21:46, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The NHL nomination papers say it was built in 1739.  It's unclear why the Trustees claim it was built c. 1742 on their website, considering they probably had a hand in filling out the nomination papers. Magic♪piano 20:29, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date built?