Talk:List of Vertigo Comics publications

message: :Image:140120046X.01. SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 06:16, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:140120046X.01. SCLZZZZZZZ .jpg

message: I think something like "List of Vertigo titles" would be more accurate and in line with similar articles. (Emperor 02:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they cover the same territory. (Emperor (talk) 11:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree. Spiderboy12 (talk) 17:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: * I think that  Vertigo comic series and List of Vertigo publications need to be merged.  They are duplicate pages.  I think that the format and most of the content of "List of..." needs to be kept, and I prefer the name "List of..." but I can accept if the other name is preferred. Duggy 1138 (talk) 07:18, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Does everyone agree the two pages need merging, regardless of the format that merged page takes? Hiding T  11:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they cover the same territory. (Emperor (talk) 11:56, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree. Spiderboy12 (talk) 17:04, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: Hello. As I mentioned in the talk page for the Vertigo Comics article, I'd like to remove the lengthy lists of titles from that article and rely on this article for lists of titles by sub-imprint to improve readability of the main article and slim it down a bit. Information about what sub-imprint any given title was published under appears on this article in the "Notes" column. However, there's not a way, so far as I can tell, to sort by sub-imprint, let alone to link to a list by imprint.
The List of Image Comics publications has an alphabetized list of most of the company's titles, followed by lists broken down by imprint. I'd like to add something similar here. However, I'm not sure what the best format would be. There was some controversy over whether to use tables or a straight bullet list here previously, and it looks like tables won. But that seems overkill for the imprint lists. On the other hand, it seems like it would look a little weird to have the tables followed by a series of bulleted lists.
Anyone have thoughts or preferences? Klintron23 (talk) 23:38, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections for sub-imprints