Talk:Los Angeles-class submarine

message: Re: Los Angeles-class submarine and your reversion of my edit which created a section for "Ship in class", but forgot to remove the "See also" section which had the same list.  
Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/Guidelines#Sample ship class article and other ship class articles, there is a specific section for the list of ships instead of using the vanilla "See also" section. 
See Benjamin Franklin-class submarine#Boats in class and James Madison-class submarine#Boats in class and Balao-class submarine#Ships in class as examples.
It appears that the section maybe should be "Boats in class" instead of "Ships in class".  I will reach out to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ships/Guidelines for clarification.  Thanks. — MrDolomite • Talk 18:59, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved your post here, where it belongs, instead of my talk page. As for that edit, it was a year ago, but it appears I reverted it because you had added a duplicate link, as I basically noted in my edit summary. As for your examples above, all of those sub class pages have the ship list included in an in-article table, whereas the Los-Angeles class boats are all listed on their own separate page. I saw your post at wp:ships/guidelines and may also respond there at some point, but basically there is no hard, fast rule on article consistency, (though usually I'm in favor of it). If you want to go through all the various ship-class pages that have in-article lists of the class' ships (most do) and  make all the sub-headings for the lists the same, go for it. As for this page, if you really want to have the list article linked under it's own "Ship list" sub-heading, go for it, but you would have to remove the duplicate link from the "See also" section. - wolf 23:34, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Los Angeles-class submarine 

message: I meant to change it to Los Angeles–class submarine (with an en dash), but I messed up and left out the italics. Feel free to update (fixing the redirects) or revert. Electricmaster (talk) 22:03, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted the move, as a hyphen is correct. BilCat (talk) 22:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

text: See WP:NC-SHIPS#Using ship class names in articles, where the examples are clearly hyphens. BilCat (talk) 22:39, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: , please slow down and take steps to avoid these repeated disruptions. Before making significant content changes, you could start a thread on the talk page seeking feedback, and for page moves, you could post an RM and seek consensus. (imho)Also, thanks for fixing this . - wolf 07:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  en dash 

message: I was going to start a list of boats in the class (standard in many other articles), but I came across List of Los Angeles-class submarines. Should this not simply be merged into this article? Copying and pasting is an option, but why maintain it in two places?
Precedent (i.e. articles where the list of ships/boats is in the main article and not a sub-article):
*Arleigh Burke-class destroyer
*Ohio-class submarine
*Virginia-class submarine
*Nimitz-class aircraft carrier
*Type 23 frigate
*FREMM multipurpose frigate
Mark83 (talk) 01:44, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion