lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:UEFA Euro 1996 qualifying

message: I don't even see any source for the method by which the coefficients were determined, let alone a source for those coefficients themselves. Can someone please find one before we re-add this info? – PeeJay 20:31, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If you do the math as I've done, the teams end up in each pot as listed. It was unlikely to be any other method since UEFA used the 'points per game' method for future tournaments. In addition, if you look at UEFA Euro 2008 qualifying as well as the 2002 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA) they use the same 'points per game' method and the numerical coefficients are listed beside each team. I also added the qualification coefficients to Euro 2000, Euro 2004, and the 2006 World Cup simply based on what was already written in the articles. Thedefenceman (talk) 21:44, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe so, but you still haven’t provided any actual evidence that the seedings were determined that way. – PeeJay 22:15, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I was simply going on what was already in the article. Thedefenceman (talk) 22:20, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I get that, I think what I'm suggesting is that we remove the unsourced content from the article, including the coefficient calculation. – PeeJay 10:05, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Based on your recent edits, it shows the teams split among six pools with no source, calculation method, or numerical coefficient value. If you decided to remove calculation method along with the numerical coefficient, then it would make sense remove the seeding pools as well because there would be no way to know how the teams were ranked and assigned to each pool. — Thedefenceman (talk) 17:05, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seeding coefficients 

message: I wanted to bring the idea of potentially bringing back the wider summary table simply because it's easier to read over the current one and more consistent with other UEFA qualification summaries
Previous version:
Group 1	Group 2	Group 3	Group 4	Group 5	Group 6	Group 7	Group 8
       	       	       	       	       	       	       	
       	       	       	       	       	       	       	
       	       	       	       	       	       	       	
Current version:
Group 1	Group 2	Group 3	Group 4	Group 5	Group 6	Group 7	Group 8
       	       	       	       	       	       	       	
       	       	       	       	       	       	       	
       	       	       	       	       	       	       	
:Yep, fair enough. However, I don't think it needs to be quite so wide. I support making all the columns equal width, but it really doesn't need to take up the entire width of the page. – PeeJay 10:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qualification Summary 

message: Israel were also included for the first time? Roeelo (talk) 23:32, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Israel first time
Talk:Quezon National High School

message: -created by nlg_turbo-
As part of the  Principles of Wikipedia Etiquette, please sign at the talk pages and not on the articles. Vekou 08:16, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quezon National High School
Talk:Football at the Pan American Games

message: It is clear from the respective articles that squads for the 1999 and 2003 tournaments were restricted to players below a given age.  Does anybody have access to information about any such restrictions onearlier tournaments?  Thanks  Kevin McE 08:38, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Age restrictions

message: la información presentada es incorrecta, la medalla de plata fue para Brasil y la de bronce para Guatemala
EL SISTEMA DE COMPETENCIA EN EL TORNEO DE FUTBOL DE 1983 FUE BASTANTE RARO. se decidió que en el grupo A estuvieran los únicos 3 países que hasta ese entonces habían sido campeones panamericanos (Brasil, México y Argentina) y el ganador de ese grupo avanzaba directamente a la final, en cambio los ganadores de los otros 2 grupos jugaran una semifinal cuyo perdedor se quedara con la medalla de bronce... 
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2806:106E:1E:1378:8512:98B6:7DB7:88E7 (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: CARACAS 1983
Talk:Shanghai International Film Festival

message: check google search  and --Ksyrie(Talkie talkie) 08:47, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't claim non-notability. I think you should look at the deletion tag I did put, and deal with that claim. Od Mishehu 08:51, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tagging
Talk:Molmutine Laws

message: Source for the laws listed? fluoronaut 08:53, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Labor bored of violations at work place 2600:387:0:902:0:0:0:31 (talk) 20:38, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labor force 

message: It seems like, this doesn't look right at all - I came here from a paper by Flinders Petrie https://archive.org/details/neglectedbritish00petr/page/20/mode/2up (he thought they were genuine, although he mentioned that some other scholars disagreed) and one of the reasons he stated for thinking that they were genuine was that they were "purely pagan" and made no mention of Christianity except for one small note added to the bit about forms of legal oaths which looked like a later addition.  Wombat140 (talk) 03:04, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Welsh triads" section
Talk:Maid of honour

message: The second and third paragraph contradict each other:
:A maid of honour was a maiden, meaning that she was unmarried, and was usually young. Lady Jane Grey, for example, served as a maid of honour to Queen Catherine Parr in about 1546-48, when Jane was only about ten to twelve years old.
:Maids of honour were almost always in their sixteenth year or older. 
Where they eleven or sixteen?
--85.177.148.15 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 02:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age contradiction

message: The paragraph, 
At her coronation, Queen Elizabeth II had Maids of Honour who attended her throughout the ceremony, especially carrying the trains of her robes. The last Maid of Honour was retired in 1936.
contains a clear contradiction as the coronation was in 1953. At least one of the sentences must be untrue: which is it? Phil Bridger (talk) 07:52, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradiction

message: I have some concerns about the page as-is. History and role are badly mixed-up and somewhat jumbled, there is contradictory information about ages, and there are only sources for minor aspect, not for the core of the article. --Stephan Schulz (talk) 11:09, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup... 

message: The incongruous inclusion of this topic withing the scope of Wikiproject Food and Drink is probably due to existence of a cake called a Maid of Honour, for which an image exists
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Maids_of_Honour_Cakes_%282548782629%29.jpg
but no article in its own right.96.54.42.226 (talk) 06:33, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maids of Honour Cake
Talk:Shell in situ conversion process

message: The EROEI for ICP can also be calculated from first principles, based on an estimate of the specific heat of shale and the amount of shale heated in Shell's three Mahogany trials in 1981, 1996, and 2005. All three trials had poor levels of oil recovery compared with the mass of shale being heated. The 2005 trial was intended to show that the EROEI would be improved for a larger volume of shale with less heat dissipation, but was a failure in this respect. See SPE 121164, Oil Shale ICP (In-Situ Processing) Colorado Field Pilots, Fowler and Vinegar, 2009.Jdkag (talk) 22:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: EROEI and oil recovery are different things (although there is a link between them).  Mentioning Vinegar raised a question if you have any direct or indirect relation to IEI or Genie Energy? Just curiosity. Beagel (talk) 04:50, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I included Vinegar simply because anyone reading of an ICP patent would be curious as to whether Vinegar had been involved (given his recent prominence with IEI).Jdkag (talk) 07:43, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: EROEI
Draft talk:Lanwar

message: The speedy stub-like creation of this page was spurred by a contest at the MillionManLAN event this weekend.  It is being fleshed out currently, and should be of sufficient quality already or shortly. Sparr 09:23, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is a link for Ronald Kim suggested?  He is not mentioned explicitly in the article, and the only connection I could find was that he competed in some WSVG events.  So, if I run in a 5K do I automatically get mentioned in an article about marathons? biancasimone (talk) 17:20, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ronald Kim
Talk:Echo: Secrets of the Lost Cavern

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*
*Keep they way it is, if its the named used in the game, I think it is better to have "ECHO" SF007 (talk) 14:11, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Tiffany Tang

message: She will become a really great actress,maybe more successful than Zhang Ziyi--Ksyrie(Talkie talkie) 09:59, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt the link which specify her birth day,it's not a serious site.--Ksyrie(Talkie talkie) 13:05, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmmmm, most sites say that her birthday is on December 6, 1986 (http://wiki.d-addicts dot com/Tang_Yan_%281986%29 & https://www.facebook.com/tiffanytangyan/info & http://www.viki.com/channels/5977-tiffany-tang), but one site says it is on August 28, 1983 (http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2874672).  I've heard that IMDb isn't a very favored reference site on Wikipedia.  I'll let someone else that knows more about this lil hottie figure it out, but it's a standing issue to be resolved on this article's page.  Guy1890 (talk) 03:19, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A tag has been placed on :Tiffany Tang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at  Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories. 
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.   Cwh0921 (talk) 13:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Tiffany Tang]]

message: This category should not be speedy deleted as being unpopulated, because... invalid criteria (C1 can only apply to categories). User reverted my removal of the tag. Explaining on their talk page in a moment. --Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 14:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: This category should not be speedy deleted as being unpopulated, because... (your reason here) --197.37.130.235 (talk) 15:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: She's one of da best actresses I know 41.210.159.168 (talk) 06:54, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yang Zi
Talk:Krause Publications

message: Shouldn't this article be titled Krause Publications? Chris.B 15:46, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no problem with the rename. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 05:42, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  -- Chris B • talk • contribs 07:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title?

message: website isn't that of Krause publications, ist that correct? 217.30.169.170 (talk) 14:09, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, this is the wrong website.  I tried editing it - and even signed up over at WikiDatta - but it wouldn't take my edit.  The correct site seems to be krausebooks.com - which redirects to https://sites.prh.com/krausepublications Jdseymour (talk) 16:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  website
Talk:George Marshall-Hall

message: We say his father was the first to hyphenate Marshall with Hall, and his sons followed suit.  But our friend did not hyphenate anything.  He simply added Marshall to his surname, resulting in a double-barrelled unhyphenated surname.  
Which means we should be titling the article George Marshall Hall, and defaultsorting it as Marshall Hall, George.  No?   This is what ADB does for him, although they hyphenate his surname while we don't.  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 01:13, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: On reflection, given the evidence, it now seems clear his name was George Marshall-Hall.  I've moved it accordingly and adjusted the text as appropriate.  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 00:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Hyphenated surname?

message: This article is terrific but cuts out around 1895, so we miss his scarification by the Established Church, suspension from the University, appointment of Franklin Sievright (Sievwright ?) Peterson to the Ormond Chair after the Agent-General secretly excised Hall's name from the list of applicants, founding a rival Marshall Hall Conservatorium in the gallery of the Victorian Artists' Society building, Albert Street, East Melbourne, restoration to the Ormond chair, and finally, er, death. Doug butler (talk) 14:54, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  More needed
Talk:Dandelion Records

message: From memory this is Bridget St. John. I will check. LessHeard vanU 09:51, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nothing on the mighty Google... LessHeard vanU 09:57, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  re ''"The sleeve featured a photo of Peel in the bath with a naked (or at least visibly topless) woman..."''
Talk:Woof!

message: This article previously claimed Eric's condition is caused by adrenaline. In the third episode of series 3 Eric stated that he thinks it is adrenaline, though he does not say so with certainty, as it happens when he is hot or excited. In the first two series it is caused by the mind power of his sister Emily who wanted a dog but it stopped after he got her a puppy. However, it started again when his best friend Roy wanted him as a dog. 
Eric stopped turning into a dog after Roy moved to Amsterdam with his family but he started again after being bitten by an insect. This is not in the final cut of the TV show but is in the novelization of series 2 (Woof! the Tale Wags On) by screenwriter Andrew Norriss. Tk420 (talk) 13:57, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of Eric's condition
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Evil Superman

message: Why is this article being suggested for deletion now? It's been here for nearly a year now and it's been fine. When I first wrote this I did attempt it as an addition to the Superman III article but it had been removed immediately after I saved it. So I decided to make a separate article expanding some of the details about the movie's characters and plot. There's also a reference to the Evil Superman on the Bizarro article, so this would serve it's purpose by remaining here. I noticed that others have updated this article since I put it on here, so it is being viewed. Please reconsider this decision to delete this article. Thanks. Inkspot 10:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Picnic – A Breath of Fresh Air

message: I had started a page for this album from the Samplers main page, until I found this one. Doh! Perhaps I should have checked first. It make no sense for there to be two pages. The two releases are sufficiently different to merit their own sections, but I think they belong together, and here. I will merge my page into this one. --Rodhullandemu 14:21, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

message: I can't see that it is reasonable to describe the 2007 album as a reissue of the original - they only have three tracks in common, so it would be more correct to say that "A Breath of Fresh Air" is a completely different compilation which borrows (partly) the name of the vinyl album. I'm not sure this can easily be remedied without a complete rewrite and possibly creating a new page. Jon Rob (talk) 11:14, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. Have amplified the difference between the two albums in the lead section. Since most of the tracks/bands featured have articles elsewhere, there needs to be little expansion here and I don't think there's much merit in splitting the article- there is sufficient nexus betwenn the two (as there was between the two "Rock Machine" albums) to keep them on the same page for the time being. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 14:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reissue? 

message: I'm puzzled by the statement "Some editions do not credit the track to Pink Floyd on the inside cover." So far as I'm aware, no editions of this album credit any tracks to any artists on the inside cover. The inside of the gatefold cover includes reproductions of the front covers of the albums from which the tracks were taken, which for a previously unreleased track would be an impossibility. But in any case, there are no references to any of the track titles there, the only track listing on any version of the cover, so far as I am aware, is on the back although the front cover does name the artists featured. So is it the back cover from which Pink Floyd's name has been removed? Or the front? Or did the cover at some point undergo a complete redesign affecting the inside of the gatefold?
Simon Coward (talk) 14:05, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pink Floyd credit on the original album 

message: The track on the album isn't the same as the version that appears on Ayers' album Joy of a Toy. I think it may just be a different mix, or an early mix before certain overdubs were made rather than a completely different recording. I can't find any external source that mentions this, it's just obvious when you listen to it.
Simon Coward (talk) 19:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eleanor's Cake (Which Ate Her)
Talk:Assyro-Babylonian religion

message: I may be mistaken, but Nimrod was not a babylonian (nor sumerian nor assyrian) god, there was a time when they called Gilgamesh "nimrod" but the two are not the same, and Gilgamesh isn't exactly a god, he was a demigod. But if that's who it is referring to, and he counts as a god, then can I just change that to gilgamesh? Then it won't take me to a bible story, and instead to Gilgamesh? Abdishtar (talk) 15:04, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's with the Bible and Babylon? 

message: I propose that the article: Assyro-Babylonian religion be divided into the articles Babylonian religion and Assyrian religion; I also propose that the article Babylonian mythology then be merged with the Babylonian religion article. 
Justifications:
*Babylonian mythology evolved and changed throughout the history of Babylon, from the  Old Babylonian Period to the  conquest of Babylon by the Assyrians, to the "Chaldean" Empire. 
**It is therefore misleading and inaccurate to lump the mythologies of Assyria and Babylon together as if they were always identical. Marduk and Assur, the heads of the Babylonian and Assyrian pantheons, respectively, demonstrate a clear differentiation.
*The interrelationships between the various Mesopotamian mythologies and religions are poorly represented in the current Assyro-Babylonian article.
*The current article relies heavily on sources from the 19th and early 20th century that may now fall under WP:FRINGE; dividing these articles would provide a good opportunity to examine this possibility.
*This step would allow the Mesopotamian mythology article to be modified to fulfill its proper function as an overview of the mythologies and general religious practices of peoples in Mesopotamia. As it stands, the article is comprised of poorly sourced descriptions that overstep the level of detail you want in an article summing up an entire category of religions spanning several millennia. Contrast this with the Ancient Semitic religion article which, while clearly flawed, provides a better, summary-oriented perspective.
NJMauthor (talk) 20:09, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Seperating [[Assyro-Babylonian religion]]
Talk:Ynys Môn football team

message: Firstly, they should be known as Ynys Môn, not Anglesey, but most importantly, it is not a 'national' team, and to call it one is ludicrous. Blogdroed 10:25, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed. --AJKGordon 15:03, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Anglesey is officially known by its Welsh name at the Island Games - Ynys Môn Blogdroed 21:26, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled section
Talk:Pilbara historical timeline

message: Was this area inhabited before Europeans arrived? If so, this should also be included in the timeline. It would be very helpful for people like me who don't know much about the history of Pilbara.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.3.115.205 (talk) 14:40, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: discussion

message: Baffling to me that the Pilbara Strike isn't included on this timeline ... Rectifying Jack4576 (talk) 11:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  lack of info on the Pilbara strike
Talk:High Street, Lincoln

message: I removed this list of premises from the article because I think it's too much detail, and also (and mainly) because it's difficult to maintain. Something, somewhere along a street as long as this will change every week or so. Perhaps some things can be reinstated if they're notable features - I'm willing to be guided on this as I'm not really familiar with Lincoln.--A bit iffy 10:39, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: User:Darkieboy236, who created the list, has asked me to reinstate the list because "Many of the building have historical significance, such as being related to Henry VIII and Dick Turpin, just to name two." Personally I think the historically significant ones should be reinstated, but not the non-significant ones. This is on the grounds that Wikipedia is not a directory. Does anyone have any further opinions on this?--A bit iffy 17:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Lincoln high street is in its entirty a recognised entity.  it shoudl be taken as a hole.  it is difficult to have some buildings listedn and not others.  its the longest higt street in england.  just having sone buidings would take away from this.  its also on the cairo to carlisle road build by the romans and is an important part of linconl.
82.23.17.229 14:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: List of premises

message: Number One, High Street is no longer the Riverside Cafe. I don't recall the name of the premesis now, but the cafe has been closed perhaps 8 months at least. I know this as I live 10-15 minutes away on foot, and pass by it nearly every time I go to the city centre. Please amend. 92.41.46.77 (talk) 00:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Number One, High Street

message: DragonofBatley copied this article into Lincoln City Centre and proposed deleting it. This article could be improved but there is no way it should be deleted or incorporated into what is no more than a stub. Esemgee (talk) 14:39, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Talk:Sta-Prest

message: When did production stop? This should be mentioned. They were certainly around fairly recently, because of the Flat Eric commercials a few years ago. 81.158.0.143 10:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember them from the 90s, but that was marketed as a "retro" re-run... -- megA (talk) 21:38, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past tense?
Talk:White Jade River

message: They called this river the Hotan river on the Discovery channel. Also, the Uyghur people in the documentary about it called it the Hotan river. They were all from Hotan though. The documentary was entitled "Welcomed Flood". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.74.62.31 (talk • contribs) 
: Hotan River is the downstream river. --Voidvector (talk) 03:28, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled