lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hume Cronyn

message: I think I'm missing something here: "Cronyn's first marriage was to the philanthropist Emily Woodruff in late 1934 or early 1935. They shared a "lavender marriage," and never lived together. Woodruff insisted that the marriage remain a secret because of her lesbian relationships."
From the "lavender marriage" article, it seems like the point of such a marriage is to advertise socially that one is married, thus "not gay", whilst still having one's own private life as one sees fit; with Woodruff keeping the marriage secret, how could it have served this purpose? Since it couldn't- being secret, and the two living separately- have served to advertise her feigned heterosexuality allowing for keeping her homosexuality secret, what were they married for? Did she initially think it was a good idea, then change her mind? Not the most major deal, but it stuck out on reading the article!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.144.72.204 (talk) 22:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Marriage to Emily Woodruff
Talk:Johann Georg Albrechtsberger

message: Albrechtsberger's "Concerto for Jews Harp, Mandolin & Orchestra" was played on a local classical music station (KCSC, Edmond, OK) recently.  Is there any information on this concerto and its unusual instrumentation?  4.245.56.53 03:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Albrechtsberger cannot have taken lessons with Monn in 1755, because Monn died in 1750.  There is absolutely no proof that Albrechtsberger ever was Monn's pupil.--Suessmayr (talk) 06:14, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lessons with Monn

message: This paragraph:  
"When Beethoven was finished studying with Albrechtsberger he decided to get a few more tips and pointers, so to speak, from Haydn. From there Beethoven possibly studied with Antonio Salieri, but this is unknown as a fact. It is also quite possible that Beethoven went off on his own to make a living, and only then returned after he had a stable career."
While very relevant to Beethoven, seems out of place in this biography of Albrechtsberger.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 23:24, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biography
Talk:Sonnet 93

message: I removed the prod for this article because it seems that there is some sort of project to get all of Shakespeare's sonnets into Wikipedia. Nishkid64 20:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also have gone ahead and fixed up the page to make it in similar style to all the other sonnet articles. I have made a synopsis, using Cliffsnotes as a reference. If anyone wants to rework it a bit, that's fine with me. Nishkid64 21:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:K21

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 13:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The K21's amphibious capability has been put into question after a soldier died as a result of design flaws relating to the vehicles buoyancy in water. The Korean Military is halting further production of the K21 until issues addressed can be corrected. The Defense Ministry expects to restrict the K21 program until tests can be conducted on updated models in February of 2011.-Lostend
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=5139768&c=LAN&s=TOP  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.201.33.16 (talk) 06:27, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Critical design flaws 

message: Are there any sources that describe the armor protection of the K21? Because the paragraph about the armor links only to a source stating that ceramics was used, no sources about the protection level seem to be available. Olekz17 (talk) 15:48, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for armor
Talk:688 Club

message: I've removed the speedy template.  Yes, it was originally deleted under prod.  But if those bands really played there, the club is probably notable enough for an article.  I suggest instead that this should be stubbed for improvement.  If you disagree, take it to WP:AFD.  Bucketsofg 20:20, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 2006 

message: I've expanded the article quite a bit and, thanks to the AJC's archives, added quite a few references to this article. This venue was critical to Atlanta's music scene in the early 1980s and helped launch an untold number of bands that are now household names. I suspect that many more reliable sources without this sort of archive (Creative Loafing, The Technique, etc.) would help expand this article to at least B-class in short order. - Dravecky (talk) 01:27, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  February 2008 

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:688 Club logo.jpg, found on :688 Club, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 00:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted

message: Relocating this from the article. - Dravecky (talk) 12:43, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Commentary
Talk:Oozlefinch

message: The Oozlefinch has a long and colorful history as the unofficial mascot of the US Army Air Defenders.  At a minimum, a link should exist to external sources that validate the legend and history.
:Please review What constitutes a Reliable Source in Wikipedia. -- Fan-1967 20:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. VigilancePrime 04:43, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Tank EX

message: Can somebody include a translation...? And Arjun, too?  Trekphiler (talk) 09:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: *for the record Ajeya (Hindi: अजेय)  means undefeatable and Arjun (Hindi : अर्जुन) Arjuna whose name. means 'bright', 'shining', 'white' or 'silver' (cf. Latin argentum)-- ÐℬigXЯaɣ  21:34, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: You say Ajeya

message: Dear Wikipedians, I've recently uploaded a non-free image with rationale for use in this article for illustration purposes. However it'd be great if ahyone could please upload to Commons at least one good "free" image to replace this one in due course. Given that the vehicle has participated in at least one parade, maybe an editor in India could contribute? Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 05:30, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Free image needed
Talk:Tits group

message: There is another important and common use of the terminology `Tits Group': the group generated by certain nice representatives in an affine algebraic group of the finite Weyl group. Until there is an article on this, there should be a disambiguation page, or at least a comment at the top of this page. srostami (talk) 21:43, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  the other Tits Group 

message: changed the proposed outer automorphism from (a,b) ↦ (a,bb) to a much more complicated expression.  I just checked that (a,b) ↦ (a,bb) is an inner automorphism, so was wrong.  However, the proposed automorphism is explicitly written as an inner automorphism, so is also wrong.  Recently an IP misunderstood conjugation as multiplication, but (a,b) ↦ (a,babab^2abababab^2) does not define an automorphism of the group, so is also wrong. An outer automorphism is given by (a,b) ↦ (a,bbabababababbababababa), found by a simple search using the GAP computer algebra system. JackSchmidt (talk) 17:42, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outer automorphism 

message: Why is the name “Tits group” censored at ? --84.62.192.52 (talk) 09:09, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That's really funny, and I hope you are not trolling! Webcrawlers tend to think that the page is pornographic in nature as it has "Tits" in its title (which is pretty obvious). Dyaa (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 14:59, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This might be a good April Fool's Day "Did You Know?" entry, eg "Did you know... that researchers discovered a way of rigorously characterising tits in 1972?"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.13.2 (talk) 00:22, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship 

message: In , expand "where [a, b] is the commutator." to "where [a, b] is the commutator a−1b−1ab."
I could also render "sending (a, b) to (a, bbabababababbababababa)." more legible by converting it to "sending (a, b) to (a, b(ba)5b(ba)5)." but that's less important.  104.153.72.218 (talk) 18:27, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Done SparklingPessimist Scream at me! 19:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: That makes the same amount of sense as the naming for the tits group LeonWiki2763 (talk) 00:46, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 23 October 2017
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/ChrisGriswold

message: Username	ChrisGriswold
Total edits	14062
Distinct pages edited	5157
Average edits/page	2.727
First edit	19:51, 7 August 2005
	
(main)	8293
Talk	2666
User	297
User talk	724
Image	79
Image talk	4
Template	392
Template talk	87
Category	227
Category talk	22
Wikipedia	695
Wikipedia talk	572
Portal	4
Editcountitis stats generated by Interiot's Tool as of 20:26 UTC October 9, 2006. Nishkid64 20:29, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Göndul

message: Any chance of a translation for those of us who don't speak Ancient Norse? P Ingerson (talk) 20:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, those should be added to the article. But in the meantime you can follow the external links in Völuspá, Hákonarmál and Darraðarljóð for several translations of these works. Haukur 21:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation?
Talk:National Football League Players Association

message: I just removed two statements from this article that failed to verify, one of which for that matter contained racially loaded language. Looking at the rest of the article, I'm seeing factual errors (the Eighth's ruling in 2011 didn't really "affirm[ ] the legitimacy of the lockout"), out-of-date information (subsequent Smith terms  ), and style issues ("Court of Appeals" is the wrong link), and that's just at a glance. At present this is not up to the standard of a featured article, in my opinion.  -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 02:07, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh and the concussion protocols aren't mentioned once, despite being one of the things the Smith-era NFLPA is best known for.  -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 02:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still up to FA quality? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Sceptre (talk) 18:49, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: National Football League Players Association →  – Following consensus at Talk:National Football League#Requested move 3 March 2024 and the fact that the common name of the NFLPA is "NFL Players Association". « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @  22:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you implying that there was an existing consensus to move this article? Graham (talk) 04:09, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject National Football League and WikiProject Organized Labour have been notified of this discussion.  ASUKITE 14:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Relist, to allow time for editors to provide evidence for the arguments as to what the WP:COMMONNAME is BilledMammal (talk) 06:28, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 29 March 2024
Talk:Weight cycling

message: I wonder if we should distinguish typical yo-yo style dieting (characterized by repeated failed attempts at fat loss) from more controlled cyclical dieting approaches. There are perfectly good (and possibly even healthful) reasons why some people might want to have cyclical weight fluctuations. The best example I can think of would be bodybuilders; most bodybuilders have distinct "cutting" (weight loss) and "bulking" (weight gain) cycles. 
This is mostly due to the amount of time (not to mention the extra food) required for significant muscle growth, which necessitates accepting a certain amount of fat gain along with the muscle. Even with the best diet, gains of about half fat and half muscle are considered extremely good. As a result, bodybuilders need to have a specific phase of "cutting" or "leaning out." 
Over time, this produces a cyclical weight change that could be called "yo-yo dieting." I haven't read any papers discussing the health of this approach, but (drug-free) bodybuilders, unlike chronic dieters , have never really been identified as anything but healthy. My gut is that overdoing the "bulk" phase is much more harmful than aggressively dieting, owing to all the problems related to overeating-- insulin resistance, heart disease, and arthritis.
The biggest difference between (successful) bodybuilders and yo-yo dieters is, of course, that they have a lower body fat percentage across the board. Another yo-yo dieting group of athletes are wrestlers, who often crash diet immediately before matches in order to make a weight class. This might be a little closer to crash dieting (especially with its focus on water weight), and certainly much more unhealthy than what bodybuilders do.Kajerm 20:37, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Yo-Yo" vs. Cyclical Dieting

message: Is there a criteria for yo-yo vs. Maintaining? If someone loses weight and reaches a goal weight, and then over the next 20 years bounces within 10 lbs of that goal weight, is that yo-yo dieting or natural periodic calorie restrictions needed to maintain that goal weight? Is there any evidence that restricting your calories for a few weeks to lose a few pounds is detrimental? Just curious —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kimforbes (talk • contribs) 18:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Yo-Yo" vs. Maintaining
Talk:Mangal (barbecue)

message: As this article is not necessarily the primary article sought by those searching for "mangel", the default page for such searches should be the disambiguation page, now at Mangal (disambiguation).  In particular "mangel," meaning mangrove complex, is a common search destination. --Bejnar (talk) 23:43, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: What langauge is the word "mangal" originally from? 2A02:8109:9340:136C:8C41:6A4A:34A9:A118 (talk) 10:49, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology
Talk:Beer in Turkey

message: Turkey did not exist not even as an idea at 2000 BC, unless the author means that Greek tribes in the Asia Minor produced beer. As the reference is purely anachronistic, please revise. 62.103.25.77 11:57, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2000 BC?? 
Talk:Dry bag

message: The following was removed from the page:
This was reviewed on "Let Bill Buy It" podcast on www.KUTV.com.  It worked great.
It is unclear what this is a reference to. If a particular brand of dry bag was reviewed, this needs to be clarified (if it warrants inclusion on the page at all). Nevenmrgan 20:45, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:NewsGuild-CWA

message: I moved this page to The Newspaper Guild to reflect the full name. (TNG)--Bookandcoffee 20:48, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: I can't understand this paragraph at all except that it implies the number of printed newspapers in the U.S. has decreased? It's so poorly written that one wonders how it ever got posted. 
For example this sentence reads like someone in elementary school wrote it:
"Over the decades, an unexpected outcome happened in 2002 as only 1,457 were in the United States....",
"An unexpected outcome happened?" What was it and what was unexpected about it?? In addition the entire paragraph has no citation. Once again Wikipedia proves itself to be a third rate encyclopedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.252.183.253 (talk) 18:53, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The impact on print media workers of the industry in the past few decades has changed in unexpected ways. In 1950, exactly 1,774 daily newspapers were in the United States. Over the decades, an unexpected outcome happened in 2002 as only 1,457 were in the United States, showing an 18 percent decrease. During the same period, the quantity of newspapers with circulations raised more than 250,000 increased by 8.5 percent, but the total newspaper circulation was declining. The amount of daily newspapers dropped while of large newspapers showed popularity with an increase. This caused a   loss of members members. A poll was announced and polled people in late February 2004 which queried members of the Guild if they knew anyone that was laid off. Of those who were surveyed, 76 percent responded that they knew of at least one colleague who had lost their job in the past five years. As well as one of the five reported that they needed to leave by themselves as it was risky.
Statistics must be supported by reliable sources. — Rgdboer (talk) 02:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Depression within the business" paragraph should be rewritten 

message: :The impact on print media workers of the industry in the past few decades has changed in unexpected ways. In 1950, exactly 1,774 daily newspapers were in the United States. Over the decades, an unexpected outcome happened in 2002 as only 1,457 were in the United States, showing an 18 percent decrease. During the same period, the quantity of newspapers with circulations raised more than 250,000 increased by 8.5 percent, but the total newspaper circulation was declining. The amount of daily newspapers dropped while of large newspapers showed popularity with an increase. This caused a   loss of members members. A poll was announced and polled people in late February 2004 which queried members of the Guild if they knew anyone that was laid off. Of those who were surveyed, 76 percent responded that they knew of at least one colleague who had lost their job in the past five years. As well as one of the five reported that they needed to leave by themselves as it was risky.
Statistics must be supported by reliable sources. — Rgdboer (talk) 02:29, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Depression within the business
Talk:Thermal analysis

message: I have begun adding information on the science of thermal analysis as used in Foundries around the world. Most information that is documented, is in the American Foundrymen's Transactions Journal and in Giesseri (German for Foundry), a German published magazine. There also is much information published by BCIRA (British Cast Iron Research Association), but it is private and cannot be accessed by the public. I will continue to update this area with references as soon as I get one of those round "to-its" and read up on the formating scheme here.
SparkyVA 02:41, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Molecular magnet

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Molecular magnets. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:36, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Molecular magnets listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The related coercitivity of a material helps to 111.119.49.99 (talk) 11:46, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Science
Talk:Langue (Knights Hospitaller)

message: see also langues. Can we combine these articles? --Shoka 20:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 
Talk:Polariton

message: No questions here, just wanted to compliment whoever took the time to link to the proper references--Fano's early work on this topic.  Cheers.Lesotho 18:38, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments from Lesotho

message: :Date: June 5, 2014
:Source: University of Michigan
:Summary: With precarious particles called polaritons that straddle the worlds of light and matter, researchers have demonstrated a new, practical and potentially more efficient way to make a coherent laser-like beam.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/06/140605140131.htm
-- Jo3sampl (talk) 12:39, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consider for future use: "A new way to make laser-like beams using 1,000 times less power" 

message: I think a section would be relevant.  Considering this advancement;http://www.colorado.edu/today/2017/02/09/newly-engineered-material-can-cool-roofs-structures-zero-energy-consumption  and   http://www.livescience.com/57902-magic-foil-cools-buildings.html Wikipietime (talk) 15:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about phonon-polariton resonance 

message: Examples of such a dipole include an electron–hole pair in a semiconductor, which forms an exciton polariton, and the oscillating electrons at the surface of a metal, which creates a surface-plasmon polariton. Colinsk (talk) 17:53, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples from Nature Magazine
Talk:Legg Mason

message: It seems to me that the article no longer constitutes a copyright violation. Some offending paragraphs have been removed, and the others rewritten. Conscious 20:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation?
Talk:Malin, Oregon

message: The history section contains:
:Malin was formed in 1909 by a colonizing group of Czechoslovakian immigrants who were searching for a place where they could farm and raise their families. Many surviving descendants of these original Czech families still call Malin home and maintain family farms.
Since there was no Czechoslovakia in 1909 (formed October 1918), this statement might mean several things:
* A group from the Austria–Hungary area which would become Czechoslovakia did this 
* The year is inaccurate
* "Original Czech families" confuses what is meant historically
Obviously some work is needed here.  A citation or two would help a lot.  —EncMstr (talk) 18:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Czechslovakian origin 
Talk:U-duality

message: The article says that U is somehow constructed from, but it not just, S and T dualities. I am sure I've read in either Polchinski or Schwartz & Becker precisely what U duality is but I cannot find it again. I remember it being something like doing a T duality in a particular set of directions and an S duality in the others? Something like that? If someone knows the section of the book I'm talking about (it could be Johnson - D Branes or one of many others, I don't read books in a coherent, organised fashion) I think it would make a nice addition to this article, to give it more of a concrete definition and also because I have an orbifold I'm doing T and S dualities on and I want to look at U duality but I can't find it's definition in terms of S and T dualities again!! Gah! AlphaNumeric (talk) 07:05, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  U in terms of S and T