lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mills College at Northeastern University

message: Famous Mills College alums now show up in Google as having attended "Mills College at Northeastern University." 
This is a practical impossibility: as I write this, no one has even started classes at "Mills College at Northeastern University," much less graduated. In fact, it will not even offer four-year programs until 2023-24 at the earliest.
As Mills was a liberal arts school, and Northeastern is not accredited to offer about 70% of Mills' programs, it also misrepresents the two schools. When Google pulls the alma mater for Laurie Anderson, Sofia Coppola, and Jade Snow Wong, and because of the redirect to this page, lists them as graduates of "Mills College at Northeastern University," it makes it look like Northeastern offers avant-garde interdisciplinary programs that it never has.
It's having a very widespread effect on Google's search results. When I search for "what did Barbara Lee major in," the top result is her official Congressional biography. Just below that search result, Google adds, "Education: Mills College at Northeastern University." But the page itself, https://lee.house.gov/about/biography, never mentions Northeastern University. 
These are two separate educational institutions, and they need two separate pages. Oakling (talk) 03:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: We're not responsible for Google's mistakes and problems; a discussion of whether Mills College should have a separate article should not be informed by that. ElKevbo (talk) 09:44, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate page for Mills College? 

message: Should the terminology in the article remain as merged, or be changed to acquired? Northeastern and Mills define it as a merger, but a merger implies in my opinion the combination into a new entity. This is not the case. Mills was absorbed to be a Northeastern campus. Straight.Up.Sean (talk) 19:45, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged or acquired?  

message: Should the article be reformated to make clear where pre merger statistics and information stop and post merger statistics and information start? Straight.Up.Sean (talk) 19:52, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pre vs Post Merger/Acquisition Delineation
Talk:Milpitas Unified School District

message: This page is based on 2003-04, this should be updated. Burnett currently has over 700 students due to the high dencity housing in Milpitas.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by InternetMadmanFTW (talk • contribs) 04:00, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possibly Not Accurate
Talk:Common swift

message: Any known info on how long do swifts live? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.179.28.189 (talk) 08:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lifespan 

message: Add: Paths of Swift's flights are much longer than those of Swallows.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.180.35.58 (talk) 14:47, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Swifts vs Swallows
Talk:Mineral King

message: Incredible history in that valley. In one weekend 12 deer, 5 bears, 3 marmot, one kit fox and an incredible view at Sawtooth Pass. All I have right now are photos, I'll work on it. Next summer's project. Kidshare 03:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page should be long and it is short 

message: What, exactly, needs to be referenced that isn't? I have a whole wealth of knowledge of this area, and  what I don't know, I can easily find out. I would like to expand this and the Cabin Cove pages extensively, but want to make sure it's done correctly. Erinhayden 06:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have a copy of Beulah on my bookshelf, I'm planning to use it to add a history section here. Just hard to spend too much time at the computer at the height of hiking season. --Justin 14:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: I believe that Mineral King Road Cultural Landscape should be merged into this article. There is a substantial overlap between the articles: if we merge them, the combined article would become stronger than each individually. —hike395 (talk) 22:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, I think that would be a good idea too. The Cultural Landscape article doesn't seem notable enough to merit its own page... or is that just me not seeing things clearly... Shannºn</span> 05:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I went ahead and did the merge. —hike395 (talk) 10:23, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Pacific swift

message: I just removed some, but I think there will be more. Robrobrob2 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 22:09, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Griefing
Talk:Richmond Heights, Richmond, California

message: The subtitle of this article ("Richmond View") conflicts with the article on East Richmond Heights, California, which claims that that place is "sometimes referred to as Richmond View". One or the other is wrong (unless that term applies to both, in which case these articles should probably be merged). +ILike2BeAnonymous 18:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are comparing apples and oranges. First, we have two names: Richmond Heights (a neighborhood within the city limits of Richmond), and East Richmond Heights (an adjacent CDP that is outside the city limits of Richmond). But guess what? They are both perched on the same hill and there is no obvious visual break to separate the two areas, which I think could include anything east of Interstate 80 between San Pablo Avenue (Exit 16B) and San Pablo Dam Road (Exit 18). So I think both articles can claim to be referred to as either Richmond View or Mira Vista without being misleading. No merging required, as they describe slightly different features (a neighborhood and a CDP). Highspeed (talk) 17:47, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Association w/"Richmond View" conflicts with another article here 
Talk:Chimney swift

message: According to Ministry of Natural Resorces (MNR Province of Ontario, Canada) This bird has seen a 30% decrease in population over the past 13 years.  Currently, there is a conjunctive effort with Bird Studies Canada and a voluteer organization named "Ontario Swift Watch" which is identifying and observing nesting/roosting sites in preparation for protection measures.  The MNR has declared the Chimney Swift as "Threatened" as of October 30, 2010.
I am not a bird enthusiast, and am unfamiliar with thier conservation status rankings.  I do not know how to update such a status here on the wiki, and I would think that someone better qualified would be better suited to look into the status, statistics and possibly make the appropriate changes to the article.  24.235.198.91 (talk) 02:52, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Threatened

message: A range map would be useful, similar to this one: , from here: ~E  15:31, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range map 

message: I clarified the fact that this swift has two fovea per eye.  I relied on the following source, which I did not add; a different source is probably preferred:
*
Somebody might want to expand just a little about the 'bifoveal vision'.  I would consider doing this, but thus-far all that I know about the subject is from that source.  By the way, some birds are trifovial.  ~Eric:71.20.250.51 (talk) 21:38, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a footnote with link to the Bird vision article; there probably is a better solution, however. ~E:71.20.250.51 (talk) 19:26, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fovea
Talk:Coraciidae

message: "Old World" is pretty vague geographically: where do rollers actually occur? )I know there are more details under individual species, but I think a general summary/map would be helpful here too.) 86.132.142.153 (talk) 16:21, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, please add. jimfbleak (talk) 07:37, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Distribution? 

message: vdvdc v 5.238.18.6 (talk) 12:39, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  shopping with a roller🐦🛒🥔🥦🥦🥕🥑 

message: rm.a4myxb 5.238.18.6 (talk) 12:44, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  turnstone birds portal
Talk:Osteochondritis

message: I was diagnosed several years ago with chondronitis..my basic understanding is the inflamation of the ligaments particularliy in my case around the rib cage area.  My symptoms generally included difficulty breathing as though someone is pressing on my diaphram.  Additionally, I have this severe stabbing like pain in my back area of my ribs.  It is sometimes accompanied by gas.  I haven't found details on the causes and if there is any cure.  I typically fight it by taking for a few days anti-inflammatory medication and professional massage.  Please advise.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.12.142.174 (talk) 16:04, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Otitis externa in animals

message: Can anyone find any reliable sources about the suitability of this for cleaning a dog ear infection? Our vet perscribed one that's 1% but it's running out and we have a 3% solution marketed for human cuts but I'm not sure if it's too strong for the ear directly and needs to be diluted or if it might work better due to being more concentrated. 64.231.168.150 (talk) 21:41, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [[hydrogen peroxide]]
Talk:Mission Indians

message: I suggest these two lists be moved to two separate list articles. They just clutter up the main article. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 19:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Missions and List of Mission Tribes 

message: The lede refers to all 21 missions, but the list of associated missions only lists missions in Southern California as far north as San Luis Obispo, and the list of mission tribes only lists tribes found in Southern California, with the exception of the Costanoan Band of Carmel Mission Indians. There is no tribe by that name, as they apparently are known today as the Ohlone Costanoan
Esselen Nation.  — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 15:41, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which missions?
Talk:Congenital portosystemic shunt

message: at most, vetinary aspects should be covered as a section within a page focussed on the condition as it appears in humans....surely tepi (talk) 11:49, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Um, portosystemic shunting occurs in humans too? 

message: : I'm not an expert of the matter, but I find that the article is less informative after your intervention, so I reverted it. In particular, you removed quite some information from the background section which helps establish the context – what is the normal physiological condition, why the shunt is abnormal and what issues it causes. Why did you move "epidemiology and classification" near the top, before the readers even become aware what the condition is? You are welcome to add citations and clarifications, but overall I don't think your version was an improvement. And it remains unclear whether the article should refer only to congenital conditions, when most information also pertains to acquired conditions as well. No such user (talk) 12:48, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: thank you for your suggestion. Tanacpss (talk) 12:58, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite by Tanacpss
Talk:Protothecosis

message: I added "Algaemia" as a secondary term and linked the page for additional information.--Eddidit (talk) 03:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

message: Both pages essentially talk about protothecosis, could they be merged for the sake of clarity? Starcatcher137 (talk) 15:35, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there two separate articles for protothecosis and algemia?
Talk:La Purísima Mission

message: what are the reasons la purisima concepcion built?
This discussion has been moved to Talk:Spanish missions in California. Mdhennessey (talk) 06:32, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The one that is on the page now seems exceptionally misleading.  Not only because I know that the mission that people visit looks nothing like the current photo, but also because the linked site has a better and more current picture, can we get a new photo here?
Rocdahut (talk) 07:30, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Different Photo Possible?=

message: I feel like this article should be merger with La Purísima Mission State Historic Park. They are both about the mission and it's surroundings, and both give a history of the mission. --Corysn123🚀 📞talk 14:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with La Purísima Mission State Historic Park 

message: Several years ago,  Corysn123 proposed merging La Purísima Mission State Historic Park into this article.  I think that is the right call and I also think that Site of original mission and remaining ruins of La Purisima Mission should be merged into this article as well.  There's so much overlap between these three articles and none are particularly long such that it seems silly to have them all as independent articles.  Absent consensus to the contrary, I plan to merge these together in the next week or so. DocFreeman24 (talk) 01:33, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Completely agree with  and previous proposal by . All three should be merged into a single article called La Purísima Mission. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 22:17, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  support both merges, as proposed. Klbrain (talk) 19:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 14:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Merge of [[La Purísima Mission State Historic Park]] & [[Site of original mission and remaining ruins of La Purisima Mission]] into this article
Talk:Montluçon

message: End of one paragraph: "The manufacturing of tires for Luftwaffe aircraft was also of interest for the Nazis".
Then the new paragraph, "A notable act of resistance occurred in the city on January 6, 1943 when a mob of citizens overran guards supervising a massive deportation of men to Germany in accordance with the Service de Travail Obligatoire..."
''
And then, an almost comical error, at the start of the next paragraph: "For this reason, the Allies bombed the site on 12–16 September 1943"
No doubt, there was no intention to suggest that the town was bombed by the Allies because of an "act of resistance", but that's how it is written.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.124.7.29 (talk) 16:43, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  It looks like somebody added a paragraph, and the sentences don't go together anymore. 
Talk:Mission Reds

message: The third paragraph is incorrect I believe.  Certainly Valencia & 14th is in the Mission, and arguably so is Bryant & 16th. Dbtucker 21:05, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's not clear to me if the LA team and Sacramento team are related --AW (talk) 17:02, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing
Talk:Mission San Antonio de Padua

message: This discussion has been moved to Talk:Spanish missions in California. Mdhennessey (talk) 06:15, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the prehistory of the native American peoples? 

message: If interested in updating this article, see CAMPAIGN FOR THE PRESERVATION OF MISSION SAN ANTONIO DE PADUA. — btphelps (talk to me) (what I've done) 00:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 

message: The daily jobs are only for mostly men 2603:8001:0:146E:E13F:5091:8535:4005 (talk) 02:33, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are the daily jobs? 

message: The daily jobs  were mostly  for men they had to plotting crops, working  in workshops and women cooked for men and wove 2603:8001:0:146E:E13F:5091:8535:4005 (talk) 02:35, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are san antonio  de padua  daily jobs
Talk:San Antonio de Pala Asistencia

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the Asistencia San Antonio de Pala. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was No move evrik (talk) 14:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move redux

message: This discussion has been moved to Talk:Spanish missions in California. Mdhennessey (talk) 06:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the prehistory of the native American peoples? 

message: I've fixed a named ref entry to eliminate a multiple citation error, which was caused by misuse of refname. However, the article has several instances of the same editing mistake, which should be tidied up. The correct usage is described at WP:REFNAME. jxm (talk) 17:07, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple refs/footnotes
Talk:Trogon

message: I hope no one minds me changing the reference lists column format. I think it generally makes more sense to use the colwidth parameter since that works best with different display resolutions and font sizes. (i.e. it makes the browser try to choose the best number of columns based on the width specified, that way the columns don't get too wide or narrow to read.) — Apis (talk) 03:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reflist columnformat
Talk:Mission San Francisco Solano

message: "Chief Sem-Yeto of the Suisunes tribe was baptized at the Mission and given the Christian name of Francisco Solano shortly after its founding."
I took the above sentence from the article because he was also baptized as a child at Mission Dolores, according to other reliable peoples? ==
This discussion has been moved to Talk:Spanish missions in California. Mdhennessey (talk) 06:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sem-Yeto

message: The http://www.mymission.org web site no longer seems to be working for me? Anybody else? W Nowicki (talk) 02:47, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  MyMission.Org? 

message: Shouldn't this article be titled Mission San Francisco Solano, without the "de"? It's named for a man named Francisco Solano, not Francisco de Solano. Maybe the confusion comes from the fact that sometimes it's referred to as Mission San Francisco Solano de Sonoma, after the town in which it's located.
I'm aware this could set up a disambiguation problem, and am open to suggestions.Huntington (talk) 18:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Correct title

message: bgsbdy rsfr hea hafdm zghbdm had kahd sshr  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.168.156.232 (talk) 00:06, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  reatarad takl 

message: San Francisco Solano served mostly as a chapel for the solders posted around the north bay area.
Each of the original missions were intended to be a days land journey from each other. However a traveler had to use a boat or ship to travel from south of the bay to the chapel.
It was not on El Camino Real.
It was built some time after the 'original' missions.
Ralph-interdata (talk) 14:04, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is San Francisco Solano really part of the California mission .chain? 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure)  Simplexity22 (talk) 16:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Mission San Francisco Solano (California) →  – no disambig needed in title, this is a famed landmark that is fully in existence and the other article with the title is an obscure site and a stub article. The destination already redirects to the current title, which was created only to disambig from Mission San Francisco Solano (Mexico), an obscure archaeological site. The Californian mission is clearly the more known, as a prominent historical (and now tourist) landmark. A disambig line would still stay on the Californian article to direct to the archaelogical stub. Cristiano Tomás (talk) 00:43, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 October 2021
Talk:Mission San Luis Rey de Francia

message: This discussion has been moved to Talk:Spanish missions in California. Mdhennessey (talk) 06:39, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the prehistory of the native American peoples? 

message: were are the roomes they worked in at?can you show them please?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.142.125.124 (talk) 00:50, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  mission 
Talk:Winged cat

message: Theres an article for anything in wikipedia now days. lol
INO Exodus 16:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What?! LOL 

message: This article is embarrassing. Sentences like "There are three different causes of wing-like appendages." not only need to have inline cites, but need to be reworded to not be attmpting to state a fact. Cats do not have wing-like appendages, though apparently some people seem to think so, which is what this should say. Murderbike (talk) 10:35, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the article is very clear that they don't actually have wings, they just have wing-like appendages (eg matted hair). 157.182.186.136 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 19:01, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whatt??? 

message: I would like to see a picture of one of these "winged cats". I'm curious what exactly these fake wings would look like, to be convincing enough to produce this many "sightings".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.161.100.99 (talk) 08:07, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 
Talk:Mission Santa Cruz

message: This discussion has been moved to Talk:Spanish missions in California. Mdhennessey (talk) 06:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the prehistory of the native American peoples? 

message: Added a cite tag - this statement in the first paagraph, "...and later the Yokuts from the east", needs explanation and sourcing. How and why did these Yokuts get to Santa Cruz? There is no expanded discussion in the article text. WCCasey (talk) 04:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yokuts? 

message: My family just visited the mission and I wanted to learn more of it's history and wikipedia seemed a good place.
But this part really raised my skepticism.
> Father Andrés Quintana was beaten to death and his body disfigured by natives angry over his use of a metal-tipped whip in the punishment of mission laborers. Through an "Act of God" as quoted by witnesses, he survived. Only to die years later due to trying to recreate the act behind closed doors.
Which is it, he was beaten to death, or he survived, it can't be both unless he rose from the dead, and I don't suspect the catholic church would be good with that.
If you follow the link to the father's wiki page it says this.
> He was killed at the mission on the evening of October 12, 1812, by Indians under his care. 
67.169.141.146 (talk) 02:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beaten to death, but he survived? Really? 

message: The small chapel begun in 1931 cannot be described as any sort of "scale replica". No images of the original mission chapel before the 1857 earthquake exist, so there was nothing on which to base a replica except a painting done 19 years later with the aid of descriptions by old-timers. The "replica" chapel is approximately 2/3 the length of the original. See (http://www.santacruzpl.org/history/articles/24/) WCCasey (talk) 03:09, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Replica" chapel