lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Old Geelong Grammarians

message: just a note:  of the 60 people mentioned on the article's page, 7 are women - hardly an egalitarian school.  It should also be noted for the authors of the Rupert Murdoch article that make sound as if he is a "self-made" man, he - like Bill Gates - started out with substantial sums of money and connections your average college graduate can only fantasize about.  With the exceptions of George Bush (Jr. & Sr.), Franklin Roosevelt and William Averell Harriman, as U.S. inhabitants of the 20th century. Winston Churchill (I'm sure there are other Brits) and Rupert Murdoch would be two others.  Stevenmitchell 11:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the following people from the list of alumni in the main article, as they are unreferenced and redlinked. If anyone finds a reliable ref for any of the below, proving their notability and that they attended the school, please include them in the article:
;Academia
* Alistair Crombie, Head of the Department of the History and Philosophy of Science, Oxford
* Charles Hamblin, philosopher, pioneer computer scientist
* Gordon Hamilton Fairley, cancer researcher
* Jeremy Pickett-Heaps, scientist
;Business 
* Sir Roderick Carnegie, businessman
* Ranald Macdonald, media proprietor
* Sir Brian Massy-Greene, businessman
* James Sutherland, chief executive of Cricket Australia
;Clergy 
* Rt Rev. Reginald Stephen, former Dean of Melbourne, Bishop of Tasmania, and Bishop of Newcastle
* Rt Rev. John Francis Stretch, former Co-adjutor Bishop of Brisbane, Dean of Newcastle, and Bishop of Newcastle
;Media, entertainment and the arts 
* Prince Chatri Chalerm Yukol, film maker
* David Chipp, journalist
* Robin Cuming, actor
* Michael Duffield, actor
* Peter Gebhardt, poet
* Bill Manifold, author, historian, holocaust denier
* Stephen Murray-Smith, journalist
* Ken Myer, Chairman of the Victorian Arts Centre Trust, Chairman of the National Library Council of Australia, Chairman of the ABC
* Cynthia Nolan (née Reed), travel writer (C.E.G.G.S. The Hermitage)
* Arabella Ramsay (Fashion Designer)
* Stuart Sayers, journalist
* Simone Spitz (née Swallows), comedian
*Mark Steven, filmer, founder of snow.tv and television show the Snowshow
* Camille Summers-Valli, Actress
* Ronald Thompson, actor
;Politics, public service and the law 
* Stephen Charles, former President of the Australian Bar Association, foundation Judge of the Court of Appeal
* Tamara Fraser (née Beggs), wife of Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser (C.E.G.G.S. The Hermitage)
* Kasem Kasemsri, Thai politician
* Sir John Young, Chief Justice of Victoria 1974-1991
;Sport 
* Mark Steven Two time Olympic Mogels Skier, Professional Olympic Ski Coach
* Rebecca Joyce, former Female Lightweight Sculling World Champion
Loopla (talk) 01:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed alumni

message: Should we be including people not notable enough to warrant their own Wikipedia page? I note the hidden text at the top of the page, but I feel a simple external link should not suffice. Cavalryman V31 (talk) 03:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion in list
Talk:Charismatic Episcopal Church/Convergence Movement

message: Fr. Tanner has made some nice contributions about the CEC's origins in the Convergence Movement. I would love to see a separate article on the Convergence Movement, since it has had such a large influence on the evangelical and mainline churches, in addition to the CEC and our cousins in CEEC, etc. Fr. Tanner, I'm thinking you might be the best author of such an article, since you've been engaged in the movement so long (along with some other editors here I'm sure). I'm going to go ahead and create a stub for that article, but it will just be a place-holder until more knowledgeable folks contribute to it. Timotheos 18:46, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Kawanishi H6K

message: From http://www.wwiivehicles.com/japan/aircraft/flying-boat/kawanishi-h6k-mavis.asp  :
Yoshio Hashiguchi and Shizuo Kikahura, designers for Kawanishi, started to design the H6K in 1933.1,4 
Sources:
1.Aircraft of World War II, General Editor: Jim Winchester, 2004  
4.World War II Airplanes Volume 2, Enzo Angelucci, Paolo Matricardi, 1976 
Perhaps this is worth adding?
Thanks!  Darci (talk) 21:22, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  H6K designers 
Talk:Australian Payments Network

message: I've added a couple of references to the page, does anyone think that more are needed? lepamplemousse talk  07:35, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Kawanishi H8K

message: I've been looking, and I can't find any verified source for this nickname.  I suspect it's one of 
those post-war nicknames people made up.  Also note the Sunderland flying boat also supposedly has the exact same nickname.  Let's leave it for now, but I might switch this to be an "alleged" nickname soon. SkipSmith (talk) 02:14, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked as well for a few hours back in December and found only the multitude of Sunderland cites. Nothing at all about the H8K being called porcupine. 'Alleged' should do for now but in a month or so if no cite is found I feel that the nickname phrase could be struck completely. Binksternet (talk) 03:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flying Porcupine 

message: I removed the lead improvement tag. It provides a good introduction to the article.Sweat1nce (talk) 19:49, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: lead tag
Talk:Abdulaziz

message: The correct form should be simply "Abdülaziz", not "Abdülâziz" (Abdülaaziz)
Flavius Belisarius 02:37, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abdülâziz 

message: There is no need to include an unsourced list of all of this person's descendent's, especially living people.  See WP:BLP.  I will trim.Anythingyouwant (talk) 01:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It is also important to consider, is this content notable and reported in independent secondary sources? Off2riorob (talk) 19:47, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Descendents

message: Böri (talk) 09:29, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  He was killed! 

message: Some user with little knowledge of English grammar changed the subsection titled Death. Last I read the section, it was an eloquently written topic shining light into his death and possible assasination with evidence. Now it reeks of bias. Where is everybody? How come nobody stopped this editor? He messed up the section and whitewashed over the original with POV pushing, labelling whatever he did not agree with as Islamist conspiracy theory. Let's keep it neutral and scholarly please. 176.55.86.38 (talk) 17:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assassination
Talk:Kawasaki Ki-60

message: The wing area given seems to be off by a factor of 10. 1.5m² is the size of a bunk. --2001:A61:11E7:1101:A5FB:7691:F628:49C9 (talk) 08:51, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The figures in the Specifications have been misinterpreted in the text: 15.9 and 16.2 are the wing areas in m2 not sq ft, and consequently the conversions in the text are wrong. Green's book (reference 10) gives only the Imperial measures: 171.146 sq. ft for the first prototype, 174.376 thereafter. 80.175.14.26 (talk) 21:49, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Talk:Kawasaki Ki-10

message: Shouldn't the primary or preferred reference to this region be "Manchuria", instead of "Manchukuo", since "Manchukuo" was the name the Japanese Empire gave the region when it occupied it and set up a puppet state?  Best regardsTheBaron0530 (talk) 16:11, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Manchukuo" vs "Manchuria"
Talk:Mitsubishi Ki-51

message: Given that the sinking of the Bullhead amounts to the Ki-51's claim to fame now, a source would kind of be nice.--172.190.37.51 (talk) 08:43, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bullhead sinking 

message: There seems to be no development history of this aircraft on its page. Does anyone have anything to provide about it? --Falloutghoul (talk) 12:53, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Development history?
Talk:Nakajima G10N

message: Finding Source sites - Would someone consider these links?
http://www.combinedfleet.com/ijna/g10n.htm
I initially had a link to global security.com, but even with all scripts allowed (I have NoScript)all that loaded was a blank page.
96.243.206.236 (talk) 21:57, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Keyword-driven testing

message: I propose removing the external links - as stated all over wikipedia is not a link directory, nor an advertising service. If anyone can point to a source of links (i.e. similar to the open directory project), that specifies keyword driven test tools that would be good.
If no counter argument in the next few days I'll remove. Jtowler (talk) 10:28, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: I've updated the article - turns out at least one of the examples (about the calculator) was copied from another website. 12.48, 27 March 2008 (GMT+1)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.54.48.243 (talk) 11:48, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version 

message: Actually in most testing tools and environments a keyword is an aggregation of STEPS and not other keywords. The aggregation of keywords is a testcase!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.146.184.180 (talk) 14:17, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Quest for Ratings

message: "The psychedelic component of cough syrup is the chemical dextromethorphan hydrobromide (DXM)"
Is that really needed? I realize the doctor pharmacist mentions it in the episode, but it doesn't really contribute anything to the article. If anything, it just helps people do exactly what the episode antagonizes. --Charibdis 03:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 

message: The First airing of the News mention chicken as the school lunch, but the boys receive pizza after the airing? Is this a goof or did I miss something? 84.48.184.130 19:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure it's for a class, because the guy who controls the shows says 'I'm afraid it's worse than that boys, I'm going to have to give you all Fs in Extracirricular AV Class' or something along those lines, so they probably film it during that time.Voltair3 (talk) 17:07, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goofs 

message: Cite and return to the talk page;
* Super School News is an actual short news program broadcast on Rocky Mountain PBS.
* In the scene where Stan is under the influence of cough medicine, effects similar to those from the intro of Doctor Who can be seen.
* In the scene where the boys are buying cough medicine, all of the fake brands are actually based on real ones, specifically Cortissin, which is based on the real Coricidin and Robitussin, cough and cold which can be used as a strong hallucinogen.
* During the last "Animals Close-Up With a Wide-Angle Lens Wearing Hats" sequence, the first shot of a dog wearing a red fez also has two large South Park: Bigger Longer and Uncut posters featuing Cartman and Kenny on the wall in the background.
* While trying to come up with ideas, Cartman suggests crab people, to which Stan responds "Dude, I think we can do little better than crab people!" This is a reference to South Park is Gay!, in which the crab people first appear. The crab people were originally meant as a plot filler, but they were never replaced in the storyline.
Alastairward (talk) 14:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited material 

message: Regarding the Trivia that I submitted "During the last "Animals Close-Up With a Wide-Angle Lens Wearing Hats" sequence, the first shot of a dog wearing a red fez also has two large South Park: Bigger Longer and Uncut posters featuing Cartman and Kenny on the wall in the background.", can you specify exactly what was wrong with it? Unlike the other "Trivia" contribs, which seem to be based more on assumption or conjecture, this is something that actually appears in the episode. What would be required for verification? A screencap?
SnoopsWarner (talk) 22:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That would help, notability too would be nice. Alastairward (talk) 17:46, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uncited material 2 

message: It is important to note they never wore their trademork hats in this episode because they've never done it in another episode to date.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.184.40.212 (talk) 23:32, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stan and Kyle
Talk:Yallourn Power Station

message: I do question the use of the word "modern" in describing the Yallourn W power station. Perhaps "current" or "present" would be a better term?
Canopus1968 (talk) 06:05, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Modern" Yallourn W? 

message: This is my first time editing or commenting, so please forgive any contraventions of protocol.
I am looking at the articles on power stations in the Latrobe Valley and have noticed that the greenhouse gas emissions stated in the article do not appear to be correctly interpreted from the source information on http://carma.org/. Whilst the outcome would not be all that substantial, I would prefer the article to be as accurate as possible.
1. CARMA data is in U.S. tons CO2, and the U.S. tons figure has been stated in the W'a article. I suggest it either needs to be multiplied by 0.907 to convert to metric tonnes, to match the units given in the article, or changed to state the correct unit.
2. The W'a article states that the emissions are of "greenhouse gases" (which tends to imply the usual six accounted under Kyoto, and is typically given in tCO2e). However, the source data, again given in the article unconverted, states only CO2.
I'd like to have some reassurance from from others before I have the confidence to go changing multiple articles.
Lakolako (talk) 08:54, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GHGe unit conversions from CARMA data  

message: Can anyone clarify what a “350 megawatt power-generating battery” is, this statement doesn’t make any sense. Grimmson (talk) 05:27, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  power-generating battery
Talk:Loy Yang Power Station

message: They may share the name, but Loy Yang A and B Power Stations are just geographically adjacent projects, nothing more. I recommend that we split this into two separate articles, A and B.  Would make InfoBoxes simpler among other benefits.--Graham Proud (talk) 11:59, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that a split is a good idea. It is quite common that a plant is extended and that the extention is technically independent from the first development step. There may be even different operators. But in this case they use the same fuel source / same mine, and other shared infrastructure. This means there will be quite a lot of redundancy if two articles on A and B are written. --Gunnar (talk) 12:24, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recommend split 

message: I find it a little bit weird to give the electric power of a power plant in horse power. Due to historical reasons, that was the commonly used unit for the engine power of cars, but even this shifts to kW since the 1980s. In electrical power engineering, nobody did use horse power and I find it rather confusing to have a number with so many zeros, whereas the usual unit size is a few hundred MW. --Gunnar (talk) 12:31, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horse power
Talk:Callide Power Station

message: * https://www.abc.net.au/news/2022-11-04/callide-power-station-offline-equipment-failures/101615842
2406:3400:366:7400:1EF:B47B:6CD9:7C12 (talk) 00:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022/11/04 Callide Power Station in central Queensland completely offline 

message: The text includes the word "copilot" and several paras that read like AI output. I propose to delete them JQ (talk) 05:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  AI text
Talk:Crescentin

message: The phrase "recently discovered" is not reliable in Wikipedia. This should be replaced with a more definitive reference:  a month, a year, or some other fixed approximate date.
2603:3016:1708:31E0:A48F:E00A:8E09:7F02 (talk) 14:38, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Recently discovered"
Talk:Tyne–Wear derby

message: geesh no bias on this article is there????
* It is a bit rediculous...
Gonna change this to NOT be a propaganda piece for Newcastle United. "We'll meet again" is going for a start, irrelevant.
To the Mag desi;
Look, we appreciate you support NUFC and as such are going to be bias in your reporting, but FFS this is an encyclopedia not a forum for your opinions. The Sunderland groundsman reactions, chants after derbies etc etc are utterly irrelevant.
You are not doing much to dispel the widely held opinion that Newcastle fans are uneducated, egotistical and absolutely unable to look at anything impartially.
ok mate that opinion there is a stereotype and also an encyclopedia is meant to have detail in it, the piece about "We'll meet again" is a merely a little piece of detail, and also sign ur posts Crabman123 22:39, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can anyone find details on players playing for both Newcastle United and Sunderland in the Tyne-Wear derby as a section like on the North London derby section. Kingjamie 13:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crossing the divide 

message: Tyne-Wear is not the only inter city rivalry, so can't be described as 'unique'. Dan Kerins 09:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unique?

message: The article "History of the Tyne-Wear Derby" was deleted. I'm keeping a temporary copy at Talk:Tyne-Wear derby/History of the Tyne-Wear Derby, just in case there's anything useful there to merge here. Nabla 21:26, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No one used it, deleted. - Nabla 16:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of History of the Tyne-Wear Derby 

message: There is a link at the end of the article which takes you to a comprehensive head to head record of NUFC v SAFC. 53 wins apiece. 
 
However it shows that SAFC’s 53 wins includes two in non-major competitions (essentially friendlies). 
 
The first on 3rd August 74 is a 2-1 SAFC win in the Texaco Cup. The second on 6 August 1975 is a 2-0 win in the Anglo-Scottish Cup. 
 
In major competitions NUFC have won 53 and SAFC 51. 
 
If contributors insist on editing to show 53 wins apiece then they should make clear the breakdown of competitions for those wins. 
“No point on reasoning” because you simply can’t change facts. Wassel Newman (talk) 19:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tyne Wear record
Talk:Marianne von Werefkin

message: Although there are many web sites that give her birth date as September 11, there are more that give it as August 29 (OS), for example, these: ,  and . This one gives both , but clearly one is in error, because the difference between the two calendars in the nineteenth century was 12 days. I suspect there was an initial miscalculation of the NS date, based on the 13-day difference in the twentieth century, and many subsequent articles used that without rechecking.
Rbraunwa 03:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Her birth date 

message: Her work passes into the public domain on 1 January 2009, the beginning of the first full year, 70 years after her death. Ty 05:39, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Public domain

message: The article stated that Jawlensky desired to make Werefkin his protégé. I guess somebody misunderstood the word protégé, since Werefkin was the mentor, not Jawlensky. I already corrected this. But there is the question of the desiring: Did really Jawlensky seek out Werefkin? -- Tomdo08 (talk) 07:30, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Werefkin and Jawlensky
Talk:Xenophilia/Archive 1

message: I find the claim that Xenophilia is any more than a band or the love of foreign things or persons dubious. The only source is a solitary website specializing in the artwork of the claimed meaning. Contributions suggesting this meaning have only been made by unregistered members, and could very well be the same person. It was previously tagged for deletion, and I'm not sure if that tag was properly removed.Melander 20:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed 

message: Hello. Saw the message that this page needs to be cleaned up. Working on it now. What in particular triggered this message? Thanks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 169.237.138.110 (talk • contribs) .
* Looking at it, I would say it's the inline links, some of which lead externally and some of which should be replaced with   syntax. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:05, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up Talk
Talk:Gabardine

message: I think there needs to be a pop culture section. Gabardine is noted in fiction, as well as in America (Simon & Garfunkel song). Bearian (talk) 01:32, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture 

message: Text and references copied from Performance (textiles) Talk to Gabardine,  See former article's history for a list of contributors. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 09:07, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution
Talk:Rhonda Galbally

message: The result of this AfD discussion was keep. (aeropagitica) 12:44, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonda Galbally]] 

message: This article was, prior to my edits today, a direct WP:COPYPASTE from https://www.saxton.com.au/rhonda-galbally/ Given that the profiles for Saxton's speakers are typically written by the speaker themselves, this would appear to be a copyright violation and plagiarism as well as WP:SPS. Refer tag placed on this article. Rangasyd (talk) 13:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy/edit from Saxton's page 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.saxton.com.au/rhonda-galbally/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  — Diannaa (talk) 18:54, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed