Talk:Roméo et Juliette (musical)

message: I'm new to the League of Copyeditors, so forgive me if I made some blunders.  I found this article while trying to edit a duplicate, so I redirected the duplicate to here, and transferred the copyediting tag to this article as well.  I tried to edit out the original author's unbalanced comments, and to reformat the headings.  Please let me know what you think.Konczewski 19:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work! BuddingJournalist 03:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyediting

message: :Image:R+jlogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:R+jlogo.jpg

message: This article is a mess.  It may be that this is an important musical, but no one can tell because of the piles of useless information in the article.  The sheer number of productions is less useful than a narrative description of what the most notable productions were, what important theatres they played in, how many patrons have seen each production, how much money they made (box office grosses), and what notable people have been involved with the productions.  The article needs to cite to reviews by reputable reviewers who explain what they think about the show and its importance.  Reliable sources of information about the show need to be cited.  I just deleted scads of non-notable cast/crew information and endless songlists.  Each production should have a paragraph describing what is NOTABLE about that production, not an entire list of non-notable people and translations of the song list.  There should be only one song list with descriptions of what may have been significantly different from production to production.  See Wikipedia:WikiProject Musical Theatre/Article Structure for a description of the article structure for musicals.  Best regards, -- Ssilvers (talk) 16:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article structure

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:05, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Romeoetjuliette(1).jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion