lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chaetognatha

message: There are separate web links listed for the Margulis & Schwartz classification and Cavalier-Smith's classification, but the two links are identical.  Also the link associated with Cavalier-Smith refers to him as Cavalier-Jones.  Is there a reason for this?  Cephal-odd 17:00, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The different classification schemes in the Taxonomicon are tabs on the page, and you can only link to the page, not the individual tabs. I added a bit instruction to the links on how to find the classifications. As for the name, it looks like a typo (that I may have made last year). The Taxonomicon does list him as Cavalier-Smith. -- Donald Albury 18:52, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for pointing out the different tabs on the Taxonomicon.  I didn't realize the website had that feature.  Cheers, Cephal-odd 04:44, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Web links for taxonomy 

message: "Chaetognaths swim using their tail fin for propulsion" can anybody cite a source for this statement? I have found information to the contrary "Tail fin is...with no musculature and therefore incapable of swimming movements."Phylum Chaetognatha: Wesley R. Elsberry although I'm not certain of the reliability of this source. 71.222.194.78 07:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tail fin for propulsion 

message: "Unlike those of vertebrates, however, these are composed of a thickened basement membrane extending from the epidermis"
This distinction would be more useful if someone could explain how they are unlike ray fins in fish, whose composition is not described either here or on the fin ray section.  The latter gives some general traits of rays and spines, but no technical information, followed by a description of Lepidotrichia.  It's obviously a slightly tricky area because it's not strictly either page's responsibility to describe the other one, but it leaves statements like this that lead off into thin air. -- Shimmin Beg (talk) 10:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ray fins 

message: Families Protoeukrohniidae and Tokiokaispadellidae are disputed/invalid, see eg WORMS and IRMNG--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:55, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The taxonomy section is full of errors in addition to those families. I am removing this section completely, until somebody can get it in agreement with WoRMS. Sushilover2000 (talk) 02:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Disputed families
Talk:Michael Kupperman

message: It should be noted that Michael Kupperman is currently writing a comic serial, The Spoily Brats, that's appearing in the new paperback editions of A Series of Unfortunate Events. I'm not sure where to fit it in on the page, which is why I haven't done it myself (regardless of WP:BOLD). If somebody adds it, though, I could probably find a source. 81.158.7.240 15:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Much of this page is listing his bibliography and other works, and redundant descriptions of his content which would be better served as part of a different section. There are also some questionably evaluative statements, such as referring to his father as "the most famous of the 1940's Quiz Kids". The Recurring Characters section is not necessary, due to the simplistic descriptions - "Underpants-On-His-Head Man — A costumed crimefighter who wears underpants on his head". All this leads to an informal, positive tone, more like a puff piece than an encyclopedia entry.
Due to the number of repeated facts and the volume of detail in the opening paragraph and biography, I propose restructuring this article more formally.
My suggested changes would be:
* Move most of the named works to a new Notable Works section
* Remove extraneous details and repetitious references to works from the biography
* Create a "Critical Reception" section and move relevant passages rk this section
* Cut the recurring themes/characters to a few sentences and place them in the introduction. 2A02:C7F:B09F:D200:D4F7:26F6:6202:A783 (talk) 00:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primarily a list of achievements
Talk:Neognathae

message: I have reverted to the old systematics. Basically, the new one is utter nonsense for the most part (what is it based on? Livezey & Zusi's wel-intended but deeply flawed study which would have killed the career of any young ornithologist stone dead?). "Gaviomorphae" are refuted since the 1930s. "Pelecanimorphae" is not monophyletic. "Cuculimorphae" is almost certainly false (it should at least partially belong into Passerimorphae). "Psittacimorphae" is highly suspect. "Falconimorphae" is... well, no serious ornitholgist would really want to place any bets on the relationship between diurnal and nocturnal raptors. "Gruiformes" are not monophyletic either as delimited here. The "Craci" are paraphyletic. And so on.
Anything not even mentioning the Mirandornithes is utterly rejected - and for good reasons too - by almost every ornithologist today. 
I strongly suggest using the TOLweb phylogeny for the time being. Apart from Falconiformes being in a weird place (DNA-DNA hybridization data's fault, most likely, because accipitrids cannot be analyzed with that technique in a meaningful way) and Coliiformes and Psittaciformes probably too distant from each other, this is (as of 2008-JAN-08) as good as one can ever expct it to get. Nothing outrageous, all the good clades are there; overall it's surprisingly good. In fact, it is amazing how little has changed in the last 2 years. Guess they were extremely  lucky in picking up a good point in time to start. Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 18:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Systematics
Talk:Lucy Kennedy

message: It's full of horribly unencyclopaedic prose and large chunks of it read like promotional material. --Kaini (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is a mess 
Talk:Moskvitch 408

message: Isn't this car a direct replica of BMW 700?
:They certainly look completely... different. – Kieran T (talk) 09:34, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, this model is maybe one of the few original soviet designs and this should be stated. Volga models look like Ford models of that time, Lada is Fiat-based, but Moskvitch 408, 412, 2138 and 2140 are all original soviet designs. Kaksisi 18:57, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: User Kaksisi is right. The car has a unique design. Maybe one of the few entirely soviet designs. 213.240.234.212 (talk) 17:04, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The 'entirely soviet designs' weren't 'few' in number: just like their contemporaries from the West, most Soviet cars only reflected the fashion of their time and therefore looked similar to European and American models; in some cases the similarity between Soviet and Western cars was accidental. Also, there were many Western cars that looked suspiciously like their Soviet predecessors, yet it is highly unlikely that they were copied. Eriba-Marduk (talk) 07:16, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

text: Actually, the M-408 design was kinda based on Opel Kadett A series http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Opel_Kadett_A.jpg, however, it mixed ripped-off elements of Western brands, a lot from Chevy. The 402 model, however, was an original design. Shadiac (talk) 18:55, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ha ha you are wrong - nothing common between this cars, neither design nor engeneering 213.87.130.234 (talk) 18:35, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: REPLICA

message: I would like the  re-inclusion of a small section for popular culture  as the car played a prominent role in some care chases in the very popular and successful Soviet film the "diamond arm"  Бриллиантовая рука.  It could be argued that its  inclusion in the film help popularize the car further 
Since then , it has achieved cult status with people collection  both scale die cast models and  enthusiasts doing  up old cars in homage to the film. 
The  vintage car museum in Sochi Russia ( where the movie was partially filmed)  has a full size model of the car  on display  and references the film  in the labeling of its display
http://www.automodels.com.ua/scalemodel_moskvich-408-1968-brilliantovaya-ruka-vvm014_100.html
https://www.vladtime.ru/automedia/622363
https://www.drive2.ru/r/moskvich/932044/
http://www.amic.ru/news/363334/
https://www.drive2.ru/r/moskvich/187505/
https://diecast-43.livejournal.com/951267.html
I will let you decide  what to include in the main article  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matchkick (talk • contribs) 21:32, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: popular culture

message: FIAT 2300 (1961) 188.225.49.243 (talk) 23:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Design
Talk:Junior WRC

message: Hi, a have a question, in this wikipedia, going to move the article (JWRC) to Academy WRC (new name)?
I think going to do it in spanish wikipedia. Thanks, bye.--Jorjum (talk) 14:15, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A question 

message: From 2022 there is no Junior WRC. WRC2 and WRC3 will have Junior Driver titles for Drivers and Co-Drivers. WRC2 Junior will be open to any driver under 30 and any car and all rounds with no specific registration separate to general WRC2. WRC3 Junior will be run by M-Sport using only their cars for drivers under 29 on the 5 rallies selected by M-Sport. This is the JWRC we used to know under a new name. My suggestion is WRC3 Junior now belongs as a section on WRC3 and WRC3 season articles. 2022 WRC Sporting Regulations --Rally Wonk (talk) 15:53, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 

message: "The championship's origins began in 2001 as the FIA Super 1600 Drivers' Championship, and included six events in Europe. Sébastien Loeb was the series' champion, driving a Super 1600 Citroën Saxo. The series became the Junior World Rally Championship the following year, with an upper age limit of 29 introduced." - 29 from 2002, are you sure? Do you have a source? I remember the age limit being changed (not sure about when). Pelmeen10 (talk) 18:35, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a source and clarified 2003. My offline source says in 2002 but it was in time for 2003 season. Looks to have stayed at 29 until WRC Academy when it was 25. CBA looking after. Rally Wonk (talk) 22:26, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The age for Academy should be mentioned in the article too (probably the age change I remembered). Pelmeen10 (talk) 14:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age limit 
Talk:List of World Rally Championship Drivers' champions

message: Why aren't codrivers listed? Passengers are listed in sidecar and sidecarcross championships. 185.18.60.70 (talk) 00:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The point distribution is separated, they are two different championships. One driver can have multiple co-drivers during a season. See List of World Rally Championship Co-Drivers' champions. Pelmeen10 (talk) 19:46, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Codriver
Talk:List of World Rally Championship rallies

message: Please do not add new rallies onto this page until they have been completed. Remember that we are not a crystal ball, and although an event may be pencilled in on the calendar, there is no guarantee that it will not be cancelled or the rally abandoned midway through. Rallies are particularly vulnerable to cancellation compared to circuit races, due to their nature of being run over the countryside in remote areas, so it is best not to add them until the end. QueenCake (talk) 19:29, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding rallies 

message: Why the table has "tarmac" as surface? I thought that tarmac is not used anymore, and asphalt has replaced it in use. Wikipedia's tarmac page seems to support my view, though it is added "colloquial term often applied incorrectly to any paved surface of an airport, regardless of material", but I doubt that rallies are raced at airports. 109.240.236.130 (talk) 02:35, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  tarmac? 

message: I propose to remove the first column (Location) and add a flagicon just before the rally designation (better) or the HQ. I think the table would be easier to read especially on mobile, without losing any information. I would like to get feedback before any change like this.Rpo.castro (talk) 13:58, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visual change
Talk:Not One Single Fucking Hit Discography

message: Battefield? ANother? Workd? Brianwash? Diasters? Is this on purpose or is there someone who really sucks at spelling? --Ysangkok 17:13, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone fixed it so I don't hope it was meant to be. --Ysangkok 21:33, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Life in Mono (album)

message: the USA release date is just for the import cd availability, at the moment there are no projects for an american release
The album was originally set for a November release in the UK. Is "a November release" something special or what? Or should there be November 2005? It could be even earlier November, though. 85.217.50.139 (talk) 04:19, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Robert Johnson (disambiguation)

message: *Robert Johnson → Robert Johnson (musician) —(Discuss) Since there are so many Robert Johnsons no one person should be located at the Robert Johnson Page.  This would make way to move Robert Johnson (disambiguation) to Robert Johnson. TonyTheTiger 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Move Debate 

message: I'm not sure that the photo is p.d.; take a look at Delta Haze site:
"the present whereabouts and condition of the only known original print of this beautiful portrait are uncertain. This photograph is not public domain and was duly registered for copyright upon its initial publication in 78 Quarterly magazine in 1989."
Gianky 10:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photograph 

message: "Robert Johnson, former chief economist of the Senate Banking Committee. He consulted with lawmakers on Capitol Hill during the negotiations over the $700 billion bailout bill. His latest piece is 'Bridge Loan to Nowhere'"  - - - source: http://www.democracynow.org/2008/9/30/bridge_loan_to_nowhere_house_rejects
&
"Robert Johnson
Dr Johnson was previously a managing director at Soros Fund Management where he managed a global currency, bond and equity portfolio specializing in emerging markets.
Prior to the time Dr. Johnson was a managing director of Bankers Trust
Company.
Dr. Johnson served as Chief Economist of the US Senate Banking Committee under the leadership of Chairman William Proxmire and before that Senior Economist of the U.S. Senate Budget Committee under the leadership of Chairman Pete Domenici.
Dr. Johnson received Ph.D. and M.A. in Economics from Princeton University and a B.S. in both Electrical Engineering and Economics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Dr Johnson is a member of the Development Advisory Board of the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown NY and is the former President of the National Scholastic Chess Foundation. He currently sits on the Board of Directors of the Economic Policy Institute and the Institute for America's Future.
In 2007-8 He was an executive producer of Taxi to the Dark Side, the Oscar Winning Documentary produced and Directed by Alex Gibney." - - - source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/thomas-ferguson-and-rob-johnson
I was trying to find out more about him after he was interviewed about the bailout this week.  I found these two quoted blurbs online.  The DAB page lists many Robert Johnson's already, so I thought I'd ask about this here.
jg (talk) 10:20, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this one of the Robert Johnsons already listed? 

message: The link to the Jungian psychologist points to a blues guitarist.
--Kenneth Kloby (talk) 18:22, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert A. Johnson 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Robert Johnson (musician) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 22:30, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:The Soong Sisters (film)

message: I've split the article from the Soong sisters and added a bit on who starred. It still needs clean-up, but since I've never seen the film I'm probably not the best person to do it. Tryptofeng 17:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has had its infobox tag removed by a cleanup using AWB.
Any concerns please leave me a message at my talk page. RWardy 17:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of "needs infobox" tag
Talk:Orville E. Babcock

message: I am removed the unreferenced site.  The sources have been sited. {Cmguy777 (talk) 00:18, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing reference site 

message: I added edited photo to the article and replaced the original photo. Cmguy777 (talk) 22:55, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edited Photo 

message: I changed the room in which Babcock would work with Grant from the Oval Office to what I termed the Presidential Office, for lack of a better term.  I don't know which White House office Grant used, but it sure wasn't the Oval Office, which is part of the West Wing that was built during Theodore Roosevelt's administration.  [signed] FLORIDA BRYAN  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.99.22.25 (talk) 06:19, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. Cmguy777 (talk) 02:35, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting a common White House anachronism 

message: I added information on the Sylph signature from the Whiskey Ring article. Cmguy777 (talk) 20:43, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sylph information 

message: This photo was replaced with a better-quality photo.Cmguy777 (talk) 19:45, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I found a new source on Babcock and Ponce Inlet Light House. Just two paragraphs. Gives full name of wife. Cmguy777 (talk) 22:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Replaced photo 

message: Chief Engineer Orville Babcock Retrieved 04-29-2024 Cmguy777 (talk) 22:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe this archived source can be used for the article. Cmguy777 (talk) 22:27, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived source
Talk:Edward Burd Grubb Jr.

message: While adding a link to the digitized version of the "Scientific American", I noticed that this is just an extract of the original paper by E.B. Grubb: 
 We find in Lippincott's Magazine, a paper from the pen of
 Edward B. Grubb, relating "what he saw of the Suez Canal
 during a trip from Timsah to Port Said last winter. [...]
Maybe the reference should be modified accordingly --Ioverka (talk) 20:57, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article in "Scientific American"
Talk:Andre Spitzer

message: An editor made a surprising revert saying my edit was not constructive when I added all manner of footnotes that were needed, etc, and I have asked him for an explanation but not received one (though its just been a short time - as was his revert after my addition). You can see the discussion here.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2604:2000:E010:1100:D8CA:2934:4A60:8179
Reverting editor - please explain (it looks like you made a mistake) - or I will put it back as it was. User talk:2604:2000:E010:1100:D8CA:2934:4A60:8179 2604:2000:E010:1100:D8CA:2934:4A60:8179 (talk) 22:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: surprising revert
Talk:Attilio Bettega

message: I recently read that Attilio's date of birth was in 1951. But other sources say he was born in 1953. Can someone please tell me which souce is correct as to the actual date of birth of this late and great rally driver? Thanks.
PS
I also heard rumors that Attilio took two years of his date of birth in order to void being considered to old to be promoted to a top team and to appear younger ( Gilles Villenueve and Roland Ratzenberger did the exact same thing as they were starting thier careers in order to avoid being considered to old to make it in F1). Can someone please do some research to find out whether that is true or not?
Spokenwordsegment (talk) 01:07, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth
Talk:Gordon Granger

message: Gordon Granger was born in 1821, not 1822, as shown in my book <ref>General Gordon Granger: The Savior of Chickamauga and the Man Behind "Juneteenth", which was written by Robert C. Conner and published in November 2013 by Casemate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobconnerapru (talk • contribs) 21:16, 7 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In his memoirs, Grant states that despite having told Granger that he wanted his troops to pursue the enemy after the Battle of Chatanooga, and assist in the relief of Burnside's forces at Knoxville, Granger did not do so, "having decided for himself that it was a bad move." He wasted an entire day and Grant was understandably annoyed at him not moving off towards Knoxville until Grant showed up in person and ordered him to do so. Since Granger was under Grant's command, his initial dilatoriness was a refusal of a direct order, and potentially a court martial offense. So it's not that Granger's "outspokenness" put him in Dutch with Grant, but simply that he thought his own skills as a General superior to those of his commanding officer. No commander can afford to have such a subordinate around, if only because to do so would encourage others likewise to only obey orders which they agreed with. Throughout the war, Grant was very quick to move officers on who failed to show the appropriate dash and speed in following up after an attack had succeeded. Theonemacduff (talk) 22:49, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Granger and Grant 

message: The Emancipation proclamation did not end slavery in all confederacy as it delineates in which counties and territories it did not apply.  The 13th Amendment “ended” slavery with a huge exception.  To say slavery was over is misinformation.  Its found right in our constitution. 2600:4041:413F:7400:E8CC:6244:6F90:7C0D (talk) 22:22, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slavery
Talk:Possum Bourne

message: I am removing category "Drivers killed while racing" as he was not actually competing at the time of his death.Tmaull (talk) 02:48, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The category applies also for those who were killed while training. Therefore I will restore it. Julius Sahara (talk) 15:55, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing Cat
Talk:National Security Act (South Korea)

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Not moved.  Weak argument to move; stronger argument to keep. Born2cycle (talk) 00:51, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Request correction actions to be taken. The N. S. A. is a product of substantial North- South conflict, and the North is always seeking ways available to unify the South, whether by political manipulation or propaganda. contribs) 14:38, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Highly biased