lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wungong, Western Australia

message: In composing the bulk of this article over the past 12 months, two difficulties have emerged: 
Firstly, whether the historical spelling of the district's name ought be used for general references and for enduring features such as the brook and gorge, which is the preference of older residents, or whether the modern spelling (variant with an 'u') should be adopted for such usage.  Whatever choice is made, it is clear that the variant with an 'o' ought be used when referring to Wongong farm, Wongong (railway) station and Wongong Congregational Mission Hall.
Secondly, whether the article should deal with the whole of the area that has historically been considered the district known as 'Wongong', or whether the article should restrict itself to the more recently (c.1995) boundaries of the suburb known as 'Wungong'.  The disadvantage of the more restricted treatment is that it creates an artificial exclusion of information that historically related to the Wongong district.  The suburbs of Brookdale, Mt Richon, Darling Downs and Hilbert have only recently been formed from areas that were historically considered part of Wongong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by WoonganILB (talk • contribs) 13:48, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Tamala Park, Western Australia

message: Useful notes:
* Mindarie Regional Council established 22 January 1988:  Text: "I hereby declare, under the provisions of section 701(2) of the Local Government Act 1960, the Mindarie Regional Council to be constituted and appoint 28 January 1988 at 11.30 am at the City of Wanneroo, Administration Centre, Boas Avenue, Joondalup for the holding of the first meeting of the regional council." (The part of the Act relating to regional councils was added as an amendment to the Act on 13 October 1981 by s.29 of the Local Government Amendment Act (No. 3) 1981.)
*  (signed by B. Prince, Chairman, on 11 July 1991)
*  Sets charges and fees for waste disposal (there are a fair few of these, but this is the first one).
To find out:
* What is the distinction between Mindarie RC and Tamala Park RC (both continue to exist - I assume MRC is the tip and TPRC is development)
* What motivated the government or councils to establish the site here. Orderinchaos 02:50, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Scott Derrickson

message: *Derrickson got his first break into the film industry directing the fifth installment of the Hellraiser series, Hellraiser: Inferno (2000) and writing the screenplay for Urban Legends: Final Cut (2000). 
Please do not return this information to the article without a citation.--BirgitteSB 16:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  contested statement removed 

message: — Assignment last updated by Mgferris13 (talk) 22:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Honors English 250H VL1
Talk:Wembley, Western Australia

message: Along Herdsman Pde, there are thousand of people who live in units and apartment complexes, many who have immigrated recently to Australia.
Sure, some areas of Wembley are upper class. But I would say that it's an even mix.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sickmate (talk • contribs) 04:07, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Upper-middle class?
Talk:St John of God Health Care

message: ----
:==Australia==
: Has a limited number of editors, but a very good central database:
: https://trove.nla.gov.au/result?q=st+john+of+god+subiaco  - as an example
: Please understand the average editor would be very unaware of the COI noticeboard, and less so the potentially recoverable articles in the current list.
: It is a case of please communicate - and please be patient - any sudden movements will reduce the potential for acceptable action in WP:AGF
: Thanks. JarrahTree 08:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved here from user talk page
Talk:Alien Trilogy

message: Don't merge this game please.--4.244.3.190 (talk) 22:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have a valid reason it shouldn't be merged, or is this just a case of WP:ILIKEIT? --IllaZilla (talk) 01:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Freedom High School (Pennsylvania)

message: I think it's good there teaching kids about the hypocrisy of the system. Hempeater 08:22, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Why isn't the caption on this photo showing up?  PAWiki 23:57, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Band photo

message: Pen and Ink is the award-winning creative-writing and arts magazine that is a continuation of "Fife and Drum," the original name of the Freedom-High literary magazine. The name was chosen by the student staff in 1990, when it was decided that "Fife and Drum" was being confused with music-department extracurriculars.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Douglass Penn (talk • contribs) 01:26, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pen and Ink 
Talk:Rogue River (Jericho episode)

message: I've come across some new spoiler information on upcoming episodes, and have added them to the apropos pages. I've also changed the Synopsis header to read "Known/Rumored Plot Elements", which should be changed back to "Synopsis" when the episode actually airs. I've included the following disclaimer as well:
NOTE: This episode has not aired yet, and the following plot elements have been collected from various spoiler sites   and official CBS press releases.
66.90.151.114 08:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Would it be appropriate to remove the "Known/Rumored Plot Elements section above entirely, now that the episode has aired? --Vincentfox 23:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This was done, obviously. And was the plan all along. Sixty Six 20:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Known/Rumored Plot Elements 

message: Well, it's certainly dramatic that Jake stood guard in the living room, waiting for the Ravenwood people to show up (courtesy of the address in Eric's wallet). However, Jake might be waiting for a while as they're going to be heading for Eric's burnt-out house. Given the current crisis, I doubt that Eric has bothered to file a change-of-address notice with the Kansas DMV. This isn't worthy of an entry, by any means, but it's yet another example of why we shouldn't read too deeply into any of the events in Jericho... --Ckatzchatspy 23:52, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oops... 

message: Under Observations the last point reads "Levaquin is an antibiotic, however it is stated that Mayor Johnston suffers from flu."  In fact, Mayor Green has gone into septic shock which is caused by infection by toxin-producing bacteria.  The flu or a high fever is a symptom of sepsis and both Levaquin and Cipro are used to fight massive bacterial infection.  I believe that this observation is incorrect. --CharleyXF 20:54, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correction
Category talk:Nedor Comics superheroes

message: There is some confusion out there as to what characters are in public domain under copyright and which are not, especially in the realm of comic books published during the 1930's and 1940's.  Caution should be urged when adding or deleting this article.  For example, Captain Marvel (Fawcett) had his first appearance in Whiz Comics #2, which was never copyright renewed and has fallen into the public domain.  Also, Sub-Mariner first appeared in either Motion Picture Funnies Weekly #1 or Marvel Comics #1, both which went similarlly overlooked and were never copyright renewed.  Both characters are likely in public domain, but are not listed as it is widely beleived they are copyright protected.  No comics published by Quality Comics were copyright renewed by either Quality itself nor National Periodicals and all characters would be public domain for copyright purposes including Plastic Man and Blackhawk, who both enjoy Trademark protection as marketing symbols of DC Comics.
The above report on Nedor characters may or may not be accurate depending on the actual circumstances of the company when it ceased publishing.  It is clear that Ned Pines did renew copyright on most of his characters' first appearances, despite widely reported statements to the contrary.  Also, Pines sold one of his companies, Popular Library, to Fawcett Publishing, who in turn, sold it to CBS, and today, the Nedor characters would be owned by either Bertelsman AG or Warner, if the comic books they appeared in were published by Popular Library.  If Ned Pines used different compaies to publish these books, they may be in public domain.  
Clearly, more research needs to be completed on this topic and misinformation is widespread. 72.29.159.115 (talk) 10:45, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: And since none of the above has any citations on it, it should not be considered authoritative. -JasonAQuest (talk) 13:09, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The citations regarding which books were renewed or not renewed may be found at the following page:
http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/cce/firstperiod.html
Motion Picture Funnies Weekly #1 (first appearance of Sub-Mariner) NOT-RENEWED
Whiz Comics #2 (first newsstand appearance of Captain Marvel) NOT RENEWED
Flash Comics (first appearance of Captain Marvel as Captain Thunder) NOT RENEWED
Thrill Comics (first appearance of Captain Marvel as Captain Thunder, published concurrently with Flash) NOT RENEWED
Police Comics #1 (first appearance of Plastic Man) NOT RENEWED 
Military Comics #1 (first appearance of Blackhawk) NOT RENEWED
This report also clearly shows Ned Pines DID renew copyright on most comics published by Nedor, including Exciting, Thrilling, Startling Comics and America's Best Comics.
The notes regarding Pines' sale of Popular Library can be referenced here:
http://forums.comicbookresources.com/showthread.php?p=6339408  
The Trademarks owned by DC Comics on Blackhawk and Plastic Man can be referenced using the USTO's TESS system index of trademarks. 72.29.145.60 (talk) 09:35, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Public domain discussion 2008
Talk:Long Live the Mayor

message: I've come across some new spoiler information on upcoming episodes, and have added them to the apropos pages. I've also changed the Synopsis header to read "Known/Rumored Plot Elements", which should be changed back to "Synopsis" when the episode actually airs. I've included the following disclaimer as well:
NOTE: This episode has not aired yet, and the following plot elements have been collected from various spoiler sites   and official CBS press releases.
66.90.151.114 08:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have noted his penchant for this, and see that on his Talk page he has received several complaints on other articles. On the other hand, he has also made some good contributions. It's a shame he can't balance the two so that what changes he makes are done with the best interests for all, and not just his sense of aesthetics. 66.243.163.194 06:20, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Known/Rumored Plot Elements 

message: I've reversed the previous edit to this article, not to dispute the content, but because it was just a straight reversion back to the same editor's last edit, without any comments. Doing so removed several changes that don't seem to be related to the editor's objections. (These included the Morse Code template and a good deal of information on the production staff.) --Ckatzchatspy 00:11, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems 66. is desperate to spam a link to his Jericho fansite "KryptonSite" in any article possible .. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 10:43, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but I would appreciate it if you could keep comments regarding this change relevant to the edit itself. As I have previously stated, I do not want to get involved in your dispute with 66. Thanks. --Ckatzchatspy 17:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: So noted. My apologies for your having been dragged into this from the git-go, Ckatz. 66.90.151.114 08:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Look at his edit you will notice he re-included his "KryptonSite" .. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 17:51, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Horse-hockey. I have no direct involvement with Kryptonsite, other than to use it as a reference. Which has me wondering just where you derived your definition of spam, Matthew. 66.90.151.114 08:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Why would you reference a site that just references spoielrfix then? thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 09:02, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It would appear that his synopsis was based on information from both sites, hence the dual reference. 66.243.163.194 06:17, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to this article
Talk:.mu

message: If your are American, you may think " .MU " should mean MUSIC and the article is based of this point of view.
Mauritius is an independant state and .MU must be under the responsability of the mauritus governement or the local administration ICTA. My opinion is that Internet Direct Ltd has used the .MU against the international laws and against the interest of the people of Mauritius. This will happily come to an end soon. The ccTLD is a national symbol like the flag : it must be under the authority of the governement.
Thierry (France)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.138.50.230 (talk) 14:10, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A free state
Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/October 24, 2006

message: Perhaps :Image:William Webb Ellis Cup.jpg instead?--HamedogTalk|@ 08:44, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I'll pass; because (1) the holder's arm appears too prominently and distracting, (2) more details of the Cup can be seen in the current pic (:Image:Free RWC William Webb Ellis.PNG). Thanks for the suggestion, though. -- PFHLai 12:26, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Hamedog, you might want to check with the TFA Director. He prefers using images actually in use in the FAs. --PFHLai 12:35, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Wash

message: in the opening paragraph the wash is called and estruary but later on it is called and indentation
which one is it?
:'An indentation' is not really part of a geographer's technical vocabulary, though there is nothing to stop his using it in its generally known sense. The Wash is however, technically an estuary, though not a typical one. It is not the tidal part of one great river but of several relatively small ones. They are as it were, the tributaries of a larger river, the valley of which is now drowned by the sea. (RJP 10:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  is it an estuary or an indentation? 

message: Reference is made in the Wash River section to Silver Pit but it is not clear how exactly this relates to the Wash. Further explanation (with refs) is required. Can someone, anyone - the original contributor perhaps - supply that?  cheers Geopersona (talk) 18:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silver Pit 

message: To what extent is The Wash considered to be at risk from global warming/rising sea levels?  I came to this article to read about this but found nothing.  I mean, in London, it has been pointed out that the Thames Barrier has been used far more than originally projected, and there is going to have to be a further barrier erected at some point in the future because sea levels are rising faster than expected.  Surely this will affect The Wash as well?  Is it projected to become just another bay?  Thanks in advance to anybody who knows or who can point to any articles on this.Betathetapi545 (talk) 05:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Global warming / rising sea levels 

message: There is a caption for the aerial photo, but it does not show in the article as displayed. Presumably there is a formatting error. Perhaps someone understands the problem and can correct it. Thanks. --Frans Fowler (talk) 10:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Subsequently corrected by Firebrace, thanks --Frans Fowler (talk) 00:54, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image:Ruth Do328 Wash 16.08.12R edited-2.jpg
Talk:Davenport brothers

message: I reverted the edits to this article made by an anonymous contributor (65.12.112.62), who deliberately removed accurate information and substituted false claims that no one could ever demonstrate or describe in detail how the Davenport Brothers performed their feats.  This is the only article this contributor has edited.  The fact remains that the Davenports, and/or others on their behalf, claimed to exercise supernatural powers, instead of being ordinary illusionists.  This aroused the ire of professional illusionists, who exposed them time and again.  The impresario P.T. Barnum, who had no use for spiritualism, also published a detailed exposé of the Davenports, which I have read (I also added the Barnum reference).  Edeans 08:50, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: I think that the link goes to the right name, but wrong person.  16:44, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[William Fay]] link
Talk:Timar

message: Please no speedy deletion, I have allready expanded the article. I need only some time fpr the translation from the german article. It is realy an essential part of the Ottoman history.--RosarioVanTulpe 08:54, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I reverted the 12 Nov 2006 edits added by 81.213.94.151. There was a lot of interesting information in the information posted, but it was completely and wholly a research paper copy-pasted into the article. I encourage that user, or anyone else for that matter, to reword what was posted to make it more encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not for personal essays and there was far too much stylistically wrong with the edit in my mind to let it stay. The subject of this article is undoubtedly encyclopedic in my mind. Hopefully, this AfD nomination is withdrawn JGardner 21:54, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Major Revert
Talk:All Eternity

message: Does anyone have info about the composers? - Aki (talk) 12:32, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Writers?
Talk:Alan Rubin

message: It is being said in various places that Alan Rubin has died. If you do not know Wikipedia well you will think it is crazy that it is not in the article yet. If you have a look at Wikipedia:Verifiability you will see this in almost the first line: The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth — whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true. My problem is that I may believe the stories but I don't think we can or should change the article until we have a verifiable source. I've seen nothing useful and verifiable online yet. Is this something you can help with, please? Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 16:02, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Note: also brought it up here: Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Alan_Rubin DBaK (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verifiability 

message: Alan Dies on June 8, 2011
Jfeldhamer (talk) 13:24, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, and thank you for the contribution. I was wondering if you had seen my note above concerning Verifiability? The problem is that no-one has yet come up with a verifiable source for this information. A fan-site or bulletin board posting is not usually seen as verifiable. I'm personally in little doubt that he did die; but the rules are quite clear, that we should not alter the article to say so until we can quote a verifiable source which confirms it. If you have such a source, please do let us know. I am also watching but I've seen nothing yet, though I am sure that it will come over the next few days. Thanks and best wishes DBaK (talk) 16:10, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from Jfeldhamer, 10 June 2011 

message: http://articles.philly.com/2011-05-23/news/29574535_1_gynecology-alan-rubin-motion-sickness
--71.205.113.109 (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it wasn't - the gynaecologist was a red herring. DBaK (talk) 11:20, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  It was a different Alan Rubin 

message: Obit in the LA Times online today. 
:Great, thank you very much PaulinSaudi for finding that. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 11:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: He's Dead, Jim
Talk:Demo (comics)

message: Does "demo" refer to the Japanese word or the English word? Ziiv 09:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I came to the talk page to ask the same thing.--SeizureDog 03:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It refers to the English word: like a "demo tape" (demonstration), or as in demolition. I know I've heard Mr. Wood refer to this before but I don't have a specific reference. I don't believe it has anything to do with the Japanese word. Radiomaru 03:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

text: I believe it refers to the word Demographic.151.205.83.232 00:44, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:List of state leaders in the 5th century

message: I understand what you're trying to do with regard to putting together whole lists instead of just the 5th century stuff, but do you mind keeping that bit in the userspace somewhere? If anyone tries to access this article for just 5th century information at the moment, they're going to have a rough time. ~ RobTalk 04:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  5th century (and beyond?)
Talk:The Lovers (1958 film)

message: What is it about?  --66.92.141.126 (talk) 07:12, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can we add any sourced information indicating what bothered people so much about this film? -GTBacchus(talk) 18:34, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: , 12 years later, and still nothing! I guess one just has to watch the film, and know when you see it ... GPinkerton (talk) 23:19, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  not that I have watched the movie, but the articles wording of "Clandestinely, they spend the night together." Is a pretty good hint. Charliethelionking (talk) 23:38, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , er, yes, thanks, but that also happens in Shakespeare, so what was it that was on camera that someone had to go to court about it? Too much ankle? An unmarried couple? "French" kissing? Actual nudity? What was acceptable to French filmmakers and American judges but not to the U.S. cinema-goer in the late 1950s? GPinkerton (talk) 00:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was the film deemed obscene at first? 

message: Perhaps some mention of Brahms's famous so-called "sex-tet" is in order. 188.169.229.30 (talk) 21:36, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Score