lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:John Gorka

message: Does anyone have a source for this?
*In 1984, Gorka took first place at the Kerrville Folk Festival.
I know for certain that he was a past winner at Kerrville, but presently the New Folk Competition has six winners each year and doesn't rank them 1st, 2nd, etc.  It may have been different in the 80's, but now each year there are six people who can (and usually do) declare themselves "Winner of the New Folk Competition at The Kerrville Folk Festival."  Usually this is done without mention of the other five. -MrFizyx 15:02, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kerrville New Folk 

message: I think we may be misquoting rolling stone.  This article says (and has said since it was first written):
:Upon the release of his first album in 1987, Rolling Stone magazine dubbed him "the voice of 'new folk'."
The quote I've seen many other places reads:
:In 1991 Rolling Stone's Eliza Wing called Gorka "the preeminent male singer-songwriter of what's been dubbed the New Folk Movement."
It would be really good if someone with access to Rolling Stone archives could check this out so that we could correctly cite it.  I suppose that its possible that Rolling Stone made similar comments on two occasions, but I doubt it. -MrFizyx (talk) 17:32, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: For now, I'm going to assume that the sourcing in this article is basically good. -MrFizyx (talk) 17:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Rolling Stone'' quote 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Slow Blind Driveway and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 22#Slow Blind Driveway until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Slow Blind Driveway" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Slow Blind Driveway and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 14#Slow Blind Driveway until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Slow Blind Driveway" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:The Access Matrix

message: I' cannot agree with the definition in this article. Access matrix or access control matrix has to be understood in a broader sense than it is stated here. Especially it has nothing to do with the distinction of MAC and DAC. (Have a look at here) My sources are the original paper by Butler Lampson and the refinement of Graham: Third Generation Computer Systems, as well as Bishops: Computer Security, that AFAIK is broadly accepted in computer security quarters.
In addition it isn't very nice to denote this article with The Access Matrix. That The is redundant. I also would prefer Access Control Matrix because is more concisely, although both expression are in use.
Therefore i have started another entry named Access Control Matrix. Please read that new entry and do corrections, because english isn't my native language! 
Nevertheless i would delete this article due to incorrectness. 
with kind regards
SecArt 15:08, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Product-family engineering

message: Why is there a 'Family Member' defined in the model? No documents are associated and is is 1-on-1 associated with a product. Why not model a 'Product Line' having 0 or mode 'Product's?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.89.226.18 (talk) 11:23, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

message: There is a strong implication in this article that this concept applies only to software, but it is commonly used in non-software manufacturing. I have personally worked on product families in the contexts of televisions and automobiles.
KeithC (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not just software 

message: The first paragraph says that PFE is synonymous with domain engineering (if it were, it would not need a separate page), but the body of the article clearly has domain engineering as a subset of PFE
KeithC (talk) 07:34, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not synonymous with Domain engineering
Talk:Northwest School, Seattle

message: wait, wtf is up with this fort minor and u2 crap at the bottom of the page?
* Nice rant.  Your stuff is clearly POV and unsourced.  If you would like to provide sources and stop personal attacks, you can continue to contribute.  Wikibofh 15:05, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There seems to be a lot extraneous details in this article:
"...a written senior thesis (20-30pp, although many students write longer papers)"
Yes, some students probably write long papers, some probably short, but who cares?
"Friday is Bagel Day. In the past, a variety of themed days and events took place..."
Every school has such activities and they are not particularly interesting or noteworthy.
"Seniors are also expected to continue a full academic courseload, with 2-3 courses from the mathematics, science, or language departments and at least one arts course."
Is it all that uncommon for seniors of any school to be expected to take classes?
These and others I think should be taken out or re-written. Discussion? CoachMcGuirk 20:37, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Detailed? 

message: Would a photo of The Northwest School be appropriate here?  I live within eye shot of the school and could go out and take a shoot sometime so we wouldn't have to worry about copyrights.  Though, with all the construction going on now, not sure I'd be able to get a good angle. CoachMcGuirk 20:40, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very much so--please take one! --Lukobe 01:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo? 

message: I've created some headers and moved paragraphs around, but the text doesn't flow very well. I will work on fixing this, unless somebody else does! Dcorry (talk) 17:02, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reorganization
Talk:Bartok

message: What do you think about having "Bartok" go straight to the Bela Bartok page, with a note at the top saying "For other uses, see (disambiguation)"?  Surely many more people want to know about Bela than about some drinking game!
Ckerr 15:15, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would think this was a very good idea. The composer is not on the "same level" as the other things, and should be the thing you find first and most easily. 138.37.199.199 09:23, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Quad

message: Quadraphonic sound is missing. --0xF 06:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Shouldn't this page be called "Quad (disambiguation)"Nathan Wonnacott 18:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: In the Vehicles section, there is "Quad, an autonymous rocket by Armadillo Aerospace." Autonymous should probably be autonomous, two reasons:
*"Autonymous" isn't in my computer's dictionary.
*"Autonomous" means self-controlled, while "autonymous" means it's named after itself (or Autons).
Just checking if there is a reason for the use of "autonymous," if not, it should be fixed. Ian01 23:41, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autonymous/autonomous 

message: I've moved all terrain vehicle to quad. It's the more common term. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 07:14, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  article move 

message: Why are architectural quadrangles covered in this article at all? There is already a Quadrangle dab page -- which doesn't include the same list! Shouldn't this just be an xref? 
Short definitions of terms are useful: "the architectural space" is no more informative than "Quadrangle (architecture)". --Macrakis (talk) 15:08, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I had no idea there was also a quadrangle dab and I'd be perfectly happy with killing off this list of specific university quads. I also agree that "the architectural space" is a redundant and unhelpful description and would prefer something closer to the first line of the article, but less verbose. Something like "a space or courtyard bordered by buildings". I'm not against useful descriptions within an entry, just not a fan of floating definitions for things that already have links. We should link to the other dab page in See Also -- Fyrael (talk) 13:50, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Quadrangle

message: This page shows as a top result for a search for "Quads" and includes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadriceps_femoris_muscle listed in section "Other" but I'm curious if this should be promoted to the category "Sports" because it seems to make more sense there. Using the group "Other" leaves a large collection in a list and this specific item is certainly related to Sports.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.254.153.65 (talk) 17:54, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quadriceps in Sports 
Talk:Baron Dacre

message: The Heir Apparents Heir Presumptive appears to be Emily Douglas-Home b. 7 Feb 1983 but I can't confirm this.Alci12 15:21, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: this article's lead needs to be broken down into sections as it is extremely long. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:17, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  sections
Talk:CFM International CFM56

message: Regarding this quote:
" CFMI modified the engines by adding a sensor to force the combustor to continuously ignite under these conditions.[6]"
This was not the primary problem. The primary problem was ingestion of hail, not with the relight.
The more significant changes included :
-Modifying the spinner from a conical to elliptical design
-Cropping the Splitter Fairing 
-Introducing scoops and slides to the VBV System
The article should be changed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.217.214.194 (talk) 20:14, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 20:35, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to the CFM56-3 after TACA AIR 

message: This article has issues with 1c compliance because there is a very large chunk of the citations that are to the manufacturer itself Bumbubookworm (talk) 05:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Most are factual, eg "In July 2016, CFM had 3,000 engines in backlog" - ref is a press release from CFM international, and that's OK. It would be better to flag the biased statements, if there are any.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:30, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  have your concerns above been addressed? If not, can you provide specific examples of things cited to primary sources that should be cited to secondary ones? Thanks. Z1720 (talk) 21:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm following up on this, and after a skim I see some concerns in the article. These include unsourced statements (including most of the Notes section), incomplete citations, and oversection in the Variants section. Is anyone willing to fix this up? Z1720 (talk) 03:11, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FA concerns
Talk:South Perth, Western Australia

message: I recently uploaded this photo (right) of Mill Point in South Perth viewed from King's Park - feel free to use if useful. Dcoetzee 23:19, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And just uploaded another one (left). Take your pick. :-) Dcoetzee 01:07, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New photo 

message: This article has had a number of the easy from Kings Park views added over time, it is now becoming a dump ground, and I know I have taken at least 25 photos from the same location in Kings Park at different times(not sure how many I have in commons).  
It is of little benefit as so little of the suburb is actually in the images.  Usually the photos have the narrows bridge(s), river and a very negligble part of what is known as the 'peninsula'.  
I would suspect that a few images from the ferry of the skyline, before the monsters arise.. (the very tall out of place apartment buildings being constructed near the old 'heart' of the suburb).  But it is an article, not a gallery, they can stay in commons. JarrahTree 23:59, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery? or article?
Talk:Olympic Javelin

message: It would make a lot of sense to move this page to CTRL domestic (or similar) and modify the content accordingly. --15:29, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the regular domestic services belong in Southeastern (train operating company) — the Olympic Javelin is only separate because it will be a special, temporary route serving a different purpose than the regular railway line. David Arthur 18:00, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the service will be operated by the Southeastern Railway. It's on their website if you check.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alteran Ancient (talk • contribs) 18:45, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to CTRL domestic?
Talk:Hinduism in Canada

message: I've removed this statement since it violates NPOV and reads like promotional material. Also, the sources used are not reliable and in the last instance we do not reference wikipedia articles as a source for other wikipedia articles. :
:Recently, the Canadian Hindu population has become more politically active, spearheaded primarily by the Hindu Conference of Canada .http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_Conference_of_Canada This organization is the largest and most influential Hindu political and media lobby group in Canada Islamist Violence and Threats Stalk Canadian Universities, and has represented the community in taking stands against terrorism, endorsing political parties, and highlighting human rights violations by Islamic terrorists in Pakistan and Kashmir http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu_Conference_of_Canada.
Reggie Perrin (talk) 02:26, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Phased adoption

message: Concepts seem very similar.Phased adoption is the bigger article so I suggest that as the target. –Novem Linguae (talk) 13:31, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Both are poor quality, and both have different coverage. My view is that the content of Phased adoption (which, despite the lede, focusses exclusively on IT systems or programming) overlaps with the better Parallel adoption, and hence should be merge to that (better) article. Phased implementation is in some ways a broader concept, and so I think that its scope should be defined in a hatnote, which links to the (better) Parallel adoption, which covers Phased implementation in the context of IT systems. Klbrain (talk) 10:40, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking again, the initial proposal looks fine; support merge. Klbrain (talk) 20:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 11:31, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Phased implementation]] into [[Phased adoption]]
Talk:List of Polish composers

message: * Michal Spisak (1914-1965)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:603:4D01:6440:998C:27E9:7FD4:BE80 (talk) 17:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: 1970s births? Are these people that notable even? LeszekB 08:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Some are. Karol 11:04, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Requests 

message: Stuff like this doesn't belong on the page itself... Karol 19:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a list of notable and representative Polish composers. If a notable Polish composer is missing and without article, please add the name here.
I disagree... and so do others. Please see: Poland-related Wikipedia notice board for relevant discussion. The disclaimer is meant for those who constantly add names lacking articles. Please, see Article Requests above for most recent examples of what I mean. --Poeticbent  talk  19:28, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Spoko... I see there is a consensus (which I support, becuase these lists are a mess)... but the tone of the disclaimer is not right. Karol 20:20, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disclaimer 
Talk:List of Polish-language poets

message: Agnieszka Baranowska --
Aleksander Baumgardten --
Aleksander Wat --
Anna Zahorska --
Anna Świrszczyńska --
Antanas Baranauskas --
Antoni Lange --
Bohdan Urbankowski --
Bronisława Wajs --
Christian Wernicke --
Cyprian Bazylik --
Cyprian Norwid --
Daniel Naborowski --
Edward Rydz-Śmigły --
Feliks Konarski --
Franciszek Ksawery Dmochowski --
Franciszek Zabłocki --
Franciszka Arnsztajnowa --
Grzegorz Timofiejew --
Guillaume Apollinaire --
Hanna Banaszak --
Henryk Jasiczek --
Hieronim Morsztyn --
Isaac Satanow --
Itzhak Katzenelson --
Jacek Kaczmarski --
Jadwiga Łuszczewska --
Jakub Jasiński --
Jan Andrzej Morsztyn --
Jan Gawiński --
Jan Kasprowicz --
Jan Krzysztof Kelus --
Jan Kubisz --
Jan Romocki --
Jeremi Przybora --
Jerzy Ficowski --
Jerzy Zagórski --
Jerzy Żuławski --
Johann George Moeresius --
Jonasz Kofta --
Julian Ochorowicz --
Juliusz Żuławski --
Józef Bartłomiej Zimorowic --
Leon Pasternak --
Leopold Lewin --
Leopold Zborowski --
Maciej Kazimierz Sarbiewski --
Maciej Stryjkowski --
Maciej Zembaty --
Maciek Maleńczuk --
Marcin Baran --
Marcin Bielski --
Marian Hemar --
Mieczysław Romanowski --
Miłosz Biedrzycki --
Narcyza Żmichowska --
Paweł Kubisz --
Paweł Sarna --
Petro Trochanowski --
Pilars de Pilar --
Piotr Czerniawski --
Piotr Zbylitowski --
Rajnold Suchodolski --
Ryszard Kornacki --
Sebastian Klonowic --
Stanislaw Korab-Brzozowski --
Stanisław Jerzy Lec --
Stanisław Konarski --
Stanisław Staszewski --
Stanisław Staszic --
Stefan Giller --
Szymon Szymonowic --
Tadeusz Miciński --
Tadeusz Peiper --
Teodor Bujnicki --
Three Bards --
Tomasz Budzyński --
Tomasz Zan --
Tymon Zaborowski --
Tytus Czyżewski --
Walek Dzedzej --
Wespazjan Kochowski --
Wilhelm Przeczek --
Władysław Młynek --
Zbigniew Morsztyn --
Zofia Badura --
Zuzanna Ginczanka --
Zygmunt Krasiński --
Juliusz Słowacki --
Józef Ignacy Kraszewski --   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Librariel (talk • contribs) 09:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A: Articles missing from the [[List of Polish poets]]
Talk:St. Louis Southwestern Railway

message: I've read that Cotton Belt President Harold J. McKenzie had headquarters moved from St. Louis, MO to Tyler, TX during the 1950s. Can anyone source this as fact? --SSW9389 (talk) 18:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is a wiki page on this famous freight train warranted? Or should information on the BSM be included on this page? --SSW9389 16:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Blue Streak Merchandise

message: Should informational biographies of Cotton Belt Presidents and Leaders be included on this page or seperate wiki pages? --SSW9389 16:18, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Cotton Belt Presidents
Talk:Market research

message: Is it worth adding that this was common practice in France before WW2. Companies would go to a market and ask the visitors what they wanted from a certain product. An example of this is the company Citroen who conducted a market survey to determine what their new people's car should have as minimum requirements. They designed the car specifically to what the people asked for.
: Do you have a reliable source for that? OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:36, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the term "market survey" 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Performing arts festivals and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 1#Performing arts festivals until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:50, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Performing arts festivals" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Market study and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 1#Market study until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 07:14, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Market study" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Organization design

message: This article is in no way related to the above mentioned project (Method enfinering), I am not sure how such a connection can made. (User:Nicolay Worren 19:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  No relation 

message: I have edited the article a couple of time and they are immediately deleted by the administrator. 
Today I did a couple of changes: I included links to other similar subjects (organization structure and organizational architecture) and added my recent textbook as one of the further readings. The latter is characterized as self promotion, but if so, please take a look at the text and compare to the original I wrote in 2006 (available in History). From a relatively neutral standpoint, it has become a rather subjective essay about one particular way to view the field. 
By the way, my book is a textbook published by a major publisher, and was recently published (2012). The other references listed here are old and not very representative any longer of the field.    — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicolay Worren (talk • contribs) 20:26, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Why are my edits being deleted?

message: Quit deleting the further reading section. A couple of people did it several times without explanation. Stop it.
::It is unhelpful to collaboration (also very rude) Janosabel (talk) 11:39, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Stop deleting the further reading section

message: Most of the Organizational architecture article seems to be about Organization design, and it seems more logical to me to merge that text here. -- Marcel Douwe Dekker (talk) 19:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Support. According to this article, organization design is about structure and function as well as process. Organization design disambiguates the structure/process/function sense of organizational architecture from its organizational space sense. --Pnm (talk) 17:28, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge [[Organizational architecture]] here
Talk:Darkseed (band)

message: This site:  contains information about the band, however, it has been plagerized in the past.  Any plagerism will be reverted due to copyright violation.  (see history Bastique talk 15:59, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I improved the aticle so I think it would pass notablity now.Any ideas for improving the article?Solino the Wolf (talk) 19:22, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: Darkseed redirects to Dark seed disambiguation but in the disambiguation page there's no other Darkseeds.All of them are Dark seed some of them misspelled as Darkseed.So I think Darkseed (German band) should be moved to Darkseed.What do you think?Solinothe Wolf 10:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.I moved it to Darkseed (band) and made Darkseed redirect to this article.Solinothe Wolf 22:05, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for move