lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Framestore

message: Has anyone realised that Method Studios is now officially merged with Framestore but no-one has updated the page to have that information in there MOVIEFAN2001 (talk) 21:54, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Method Studios merger 

message: Please, I am writing to add the filmography of this visual effects company to your biography here on Wikipedia, if you need a source: IMDB has all the information. Remember that like the ILM filmography ON ITS RESPECTIVE PAGE, you must add the director of the film, the producer, the budget and the collection and, if possible, also the supervisor of the visual effects of each film.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.73.90.107 (talk) 02:19, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Framestore filmography
Talk:Digital Domain

message: Out of curiosity: is there anything known about why Digital Domain did not work on Avatar (seems strange, since James Cameron is a founder of Digital Domain and the director of Avatar)? S3rvus (talk) 00:56, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avatar 

message: Wondering whether this is relevant info to include in Digital Domain's Wikipedia entry, given that Digital Domain is neither the production studio nor film distributor.
There isn't a consistent approach across various VFX Wikipedia pages, but frequently they will only list Years, Productions, and sometimes Credits. Much of the financial information for the films isn't referenced, nor does it seem particularly helpful to understand their contributions of digital production and visual effects. Bofriflu (talk) 17:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of directors, budget, & gross in "Filmography" section
Talk:Rhythm and Hues Studios

message: I am bit confused by the filmography, how is it still doing effects work for films coming out next year if it went bankrupt 6 years ago?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.6.119.118 (talk) 11:37, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The company was purchased by the owners of Prana, and was kept open. Jason Scott (talk) 13:07, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Filmography
Talk:In-camera effect

message: The article defines in-camera effect like this:
‘An in-camera effect is any special effect in a video or movie that is created solely by using techniques in and on the camera and/or its parts.’
But not all of the effects listed are created using the camera and/or its parts itself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.114.146.117 (talk) 01:39, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction
Talk:Schüfftan process

message: So where EXACTLY was the process used in Return of the King? Be nice to have more specific details on all the quoted films, actually. Lee M (talk) 19:02, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details?
Talk:Motion control photography

message: This article says the technique was first widely used in Star Wars, but the article on that film states: "A relatively old concept known as "motion control" was implemented for the majority of the visual effects."
So which is correct? Or was it a relatively old concept that had never been widely used? (Which would seem somewhat odd!). Angmering 18:45, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't it be that the Star Wars article is referring to the technique from the modern viewpoint (1977 special effects are easily viewed as "relatively old" from the perspective of 2006)? Girolamo Savonarola 19:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it is it's bad phrasing, don't you think? Angmering 06:55, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold. Girolamo Savonarola 19:56, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the "relatively old" phrasing from the Star Wars article.Angmering 22:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old or new?

message: I was under the impression that motion control's chief advantage over traditional miniature film photography is the precision with which matte effect shots using multiple layers can be built up. The article's topic is the use of motion control as a means of making small models seem life-sized, but this is misleading; the techniques used to make a model look real are not intrinsically linked to motion control. The articles also fails to mention 2001: A Space Odyssey, which utilised a simple mechanical form of motion control for the fly-by shots of the spacecraft models.
The final paragraph mentions the first use of motion control photography in a computer game. Is this actually an misunderstanding of motion capture? 194.176.105.39 11:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section heading
Talk:Bryan Johnson (singer)

message: I think the Bryan Johnson that is defined in this article, actually exists of two different Bryan Johnson's. Isn't the poet B.S. Johnson (1933-1973) another person as the singer Bryan Johnson, brother of Teddy Johnson, who sang in the 1960 Eurovision Song Contest? Compare both pictures below: first is the poet, second is the singer.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I guess there should be written two different articles. Clausule 23:41, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Isn't Teddy Johnson (as in Pearl Carr & Teddy J) still alive? 86.140.164.145 12:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  This page is not about Teddy Johnson... --Wisdood (talk) 19:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Don't understand category relating to waasel words. Why here? 86.140.164.145 12:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Erratum : weasel words. And they are actually homonyms. See other ones in Bryan Johnson (disambiguation). --Wisdood (talk) 19:33, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Virtual cinematography

message: It seems that the external link is pointing to an advertisment. Or at least the site www.3dcinematography.com isn't open to public. I'd better remove it. 
Asetyyli 22:29, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to advert removed 

message: I added some recerences from the web and from the IEEE computer magazine.
Asetyyli 11:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References added 

message: I can't quite understand what the last sentence of the last paragraph means. Any clues? Why is there a question mark?
Asetyyli 14:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd ending sentence 

message: Good work Asetyyli. I added a bit more information about where the term introduced at the first place. Since the written english isn't my strenght I would appreciate if somebody checks the grammar of my text, thanks.
Thanks for Aleksi by giving a link of "Timeline of CGI". 
Piisami 11:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matrix connection 

message: * "Intuitive and efficient camera control with the toric space" article Acm.org 2015 article by Christophe Lino and Marc Christie. I read the abstract and it seems to essentially deal with automated viewpoint computation for stuff like the gorgeous settings of the Pan Am (TV series). Apparently the actors are just gorgeous humans. If someone can get me in full bona fide a copy of the .pdf that would cost me $15 it would be appreciated. --Redress perhaps (talk) 15:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article is available here. Thanks to User:MadScientistX11 for linking me to this. --Redress perhaps (talk) 18:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potentially interesting article(s) 
Talk:Mława riot

message: Was this a pogrom? I think we should consider renaming this article.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well: Pogrom is a form of riot, a massive violent attack on a particular group; ethnic, religious or other, primarily characterized by destruction of their environment (homes, businesses, religious centers). Usually pogroms are accompanied with physical violence against the targeted people and even murders, in some cases to the degree of massacre. I think the events in Mława have been usually referred to as pogrom. --Lysytalk 05:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: --Robsuper (talk) 21:59, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedydelete 

message: Wikipedia is the repository of encyclopedic knowledge and should not serve as a registry of crimes. It seems that some people abuse the freedom of speech on Wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.182.14.41 (talk) 15:12, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  PROD 

message: The information provided in this article differs from that provided in the Polish version.
The differences include dates, numbers (that the victim died after "a few days" not two weeks, the riots lasted 2 not 5 days), some details, e.g. PL doesn't say anything about the guy who caused the accident having been threatened and fleeing because of that - it says it was a hit and run, which is what typically happens. I mean how can a guy who is in a car hear people threatening him? Logically it's improbable, looks like a hit and run to me, especially since the guy was very young. Another thing is, an independent analysis cited in the Polish version states no one was injured, with the attacks being vandalism and destruction of property (The difference is also in how the English version only briefly mentions economic factors i.e. that it was wealthy Roma people who were being targeted for some reason. The houses of the poor Roma were left untouched -this is an interesting fact because generally I think in anti-Romani attacks, it's the poor who are being attacked, so it makes this particular attack quite unique). 
Interestingly, the Polish article was based largely on Michnik's newspaper (as well as some books and reports), and this article here cites Michnik as one of those who reported the incident properly. Why the contradiction, then?
I noticed that the facts that don't match are taken mostly from the article on European Roma Rights Centre. That article doesn't cite sources on those particular claims I've mentioned here.
I don't mean to offend anyone, I just feel that the differences are too significant to be just left unaddressed. I find the section of the Polish article which recounts the events believable, while the other section, speaking about "genesis" of the attack seems too broad and sociological and thus gives the impression of being defensive, which I'll be addressing in Polish article 'talk'.
Meanwhile it would be great if the English language editors discussed the inconsistencies.--109.196.118.133 (talk) 08:38, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Claims, sources, differences.
Talk:Type 053H3 frigate

message: If the Jiangwei I is Type 053H2G, I think that's an indication that PLAN considers it an imprived/modified (Gai) version of Type 053H2, which is actually Jianghu III.  --
Adeptitus 23:44, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Love and Rocket

message: Whoever wrote "Sigourney Weaver is best known for narrating Planet Earth on the Discovery Channel" has apparently never seen the Alien movies, Ghostbusters, or any of the other landmark movies she's been in. (Too young?) Also, in an unrelated nitpick, the object that stops Bender as he's running appears to me to be a diode, not an "opposite charge" as claimed in this article. I only have the DVD version for reference, so maybe it really was a charge in the original broadcast, but I think more likely the claim here is wrong.
----
Bender sounds a lot like John Belushi's character Jake in The Blues Brothers when he's begging for his life. The quote is not the same but they sound very similiar when you hear it. 
comparison:
Jake:[Falling to his knees before her] Oh please don't kill us. Please, please don't kill us. You know I love ya baby, I wouldn't leave ya. It wasn't my fault.
Bender: Uh, you don't need to kill us, Planet Express Ship ... because ... I love you. Oh, yeah, baby! I feel like doing stuff for you and stuff.
maybe it's just the way he talked to his "girlfriend" that reminded me of John Belushi in The Blues Brothers. -AC
----
What song is playing when Bender complains about the ship's choice of music? -- someone
:I've added this to the references section Stardust8212 01:18, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sigourney Weaver?

message: *CUTIE PIE
*U-R-2 CUTE
*I love you (spoken)
*You're my man (spoken)
*I WUV U
*U LEAVE ME BREATH-LESS
:I removed this because I don't feel that it adds anything significant to the article. As usual if the poular consensus is against me then I'll put it back but this is really just a subset of trivia (what I'd call "truly trivial trivia" at that) and this article already has too much trivia.  Stardust8212 15:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Candy Hearts

message: Why does Bender seemed so disturbed when he realises Lovey Bears are made from real creatures? If you look closely at his face you can clearly see that his disturbed/upset.203.53.167.180 08:44, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bender cares? 

message: Is the "Two gangster planets and a cowboy world" a reference to the Star Trek: TOS tendency to have entire worlds based around certain very specific cultural phenomena from Earth history?Mad2Physicist (talk) 07:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural References 

message: Are these a reference to anything? -Meisterdieb (talk) 19:41, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Howler mummies
Talk:Antanas Mockus

message: This is a heavily problematic Wikil. It has severe problems in terms of both content and form. 
It appears to have been written by someone with direct political interests in Mr. Mockus political projects. The Wiki is interested mainly in pointing out some of Mockus supposed achievements as Bogotá`s mayor. The information included in this effort is heavily biased, it has an excessive use of adjectives, strong arguments with little or no back up and it provides information without quoting the sources. The links provided are political sites and political blogs, all supportive of Mr Mockus, they provide no useful information.
Other problems refer to the lack of political context, the political stances of Mr. Mockus in a vast array of issues etc.
It shall be noted that Wikipedia is not an advertisement service and it should NOT be used as a tool for political propaganda. Unfortunately this Wiki is one of such cases. ==
Here is a reference for Antanas Mockus http://www.hno.harvard.edu/gazette/2004/03.11/01-mockus.html . I assume that the above contributors write what they wrote because it looks so unbelievable, it is however true, its not propaganda. I think most of his political stands are in the article. He did belong to any of the three main political forces (Conservative, Liberal, PDI (left-wing)) and as such his political stances and issues are somewhat unorthodox -- 70.45.166.124 (talk) 21:40, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any available information about Mockus' education? I have heard that he is a "doctor"; does that mean he has a PhD? Marzolian (talk) 20:27, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Education

message: Has recently starred in the documentary Bogotá Change, which is about him and Enrique_Peñalosa's works as mayor of Bogotá.
The two have been promoting the movie, most recently at BIFF in Bergen, Norway.
Trailer: Here
BIFF Page for the movie (in norwegian):  Here --213.153.16.217 (talk) 17:44, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Bogotá Change

message: Is there a reason that the mooning incident is not mentioned? It seems like this was a critical moment in his transformation into a public figure. Ean Schuessler (talk) 18:06, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mooning? 
Talk:Tora Tora

message: I thought Tora Tora meant "Tiger Tiger" in Japanese, and was their secret code call to attack Midway Island.  My grandmother named her cat "Sukoshi Tora" which I was told meant "Little Tiger." <SPAN STYLE="font-family:monospace; color:#006666; background-color:#ffff99; border-color:#ff0000; border-width:1px; border-style:solid; "> DavidDouthitt </SPAN> (Talk) 21:47, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Meaning
Talk:Rata Blanca

message: Hola, esto es para los chicos argentinos o que hablan español que editan esto. Rata no suena "a lot" como Iron Maiden, si suenan muy parecido a Rainbow, Deep Purple y Whitesnake.
Hey, just letting you know that the "grandes canciones" link actually links to a different album by a another artist. Ill change it soon if it hasnt been changed yet, Im too lazy to figure out how to do it right now :). 190.2.206.89 (talk) 03:59, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chatswood Chase Sydney

message: Nick Scali is regarded as a major retailer that is at this locale and seem noteworthy to mention.Ausresearch (talk) 02:42, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Grace Bros

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved.  – robertsky (talk) 23:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Grace Bros. →  – Both the final logo and official website used "Bros" not "Bros.". Not a recent thing as also reflected on building signage in the 1920s and 1930s, and in previous versions of its logo in the  1970s and 1980s as well as in published works, e.g. ABC News. Orol710 (talk) 03:43, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 10 March 2024
Talk:ORWO

message: Didnt they (like Agfa and Fuji) also manufacture magnetic tape ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.40.124.76 (talk) 13:29, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Audio cassette tapes

message: There are two feature length films shot with Orwo black and white film stock; they look distinctive: Veronika Voss (1982) and Night Train (1999). Some of the best film noir look I've ever seen - very velvety blacks... 151.207.240.4 (talk) 12:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Also their colour films IIRC required a slightly different developing process to Western film. Completely OR but Ive noticed that most colour photographs/films from the GDR tend to look somewhat odd with weird colour rendering but cant put my finger on the technical details 90.218.228.161 (talk) 20:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Films shot with Orwo black and white
Talk:Quintessence (physics)

message: I assume what is meant is that with a fixed value w would be a cosmological constant. Doesn't that contradict the role in the observed accelerating expansion though? Article could use some attention. Lycurgus 00:47, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What Cosmological Constant?

message: The article claims to give an age to the universe, when in fact it should be giving that age to the known universe. The entire Universe is not explored, nor do I believe it ever will be, it is for all we know infinite in age. What we know of as our known universe is not the entire universe, it seems misleading to give a number to the entire universe when we do not even know. 50.47.99.169 (talk) 13:46, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Universe Age
Talk:Wolf Blass

message: Your zero Sauvignon Blanc contains 0.5% alcohol I am allergic to alcohol and almost drunk a glass of it this is false advertising I wasted my money on what u thought was a bottle of wine with zero alcohol 2001:8003:3A2F:8D00:3D4C:F15B:6FF:D53E (talk) 04:54, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  False advertising
Talk:Isabella of Portugal

message: I wonder... how was she styled in Castile? I mean, she was the legitimate wife of the legitamate King of Castile, but her husband reigned together with his mother Joanna and Joanna was the Queen. If Joanna was the Queen, what was Isabella? I suppose that two women could not be styled "Her Majesty The Queen" at the same time. Surtsicna (talk) 17:12, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was there anything "holy" about the "Holy Roman Empire"?  Did Isabella sign the death warrants for the Incas by Pizzaro?  In my opinion, something should be mention about Pope John Paul II asking forgiveness for the crimes committed under the Catholic Church. I do have sympathy for Isabella who died while giving birth to a child.  Cmguy777 (talk) 04:03, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holy Roman Empire 

message: The text reads " it was necessary that Portugal (Christendom's richest kingdom) " . This reeks of bias. Portugal was for most of history relatively insignificant on the tip of the Iberian Peninsula, and the text section has no sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tickery (talk • contribs) 23:50, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias?
Talk:Rear projection

message: I disagree with what is said, or at least I have my doubts, in the 1931 film "Emil und die Detektive" there is a shot on a train, which looks a lot like rear projection.
Juan Schwarz 23:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did some research and updated the article accordingly. I don't know what the state of the German industry was in the 1931 regarding the ability to easily have adopted the rear projection technology then in its infancy, but according to what I was able to dredge up, the technology goes back to 1930, and thus was certainly possibly used for the Emil film. Hope that puts your mind at ease! Girolamo Savonarola 08:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disagreement 

message: I can't find a single off-Wiki source that uses the word "effect" in the term. I propose removing it, as there is a redir of that name an no overlapping terms. Maury (talk) 17:13, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The word "effect" is nominally justified by the inclusion of rear-projection in the Wikipedia entry for "In-camera effect." However, that entry defines the term as anything done before the exposed film reaches the lab -- a conceptual set that is not used in media production.Jim Stinson (talk) 23:00, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Word "effect" in title 

message: If so, could someone fit the term in?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.100.190.141 (talk) 05:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: A process screen is just the translucent screen on which the background plate is projected.Jim Stinson (talk) 23:02, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this the same as "process screen"? 

message: ‘he has been described as one of the few people in Hollywood still able to understand and use process photography as an effective technique’
This sentence sounds like something you'd read in an advertisement or a cinema gossip magazine, not one would read in an encyclopaedia. It mainly banks on the reputation of the person, sounding positive while being vague about what, if anything, is actually meant.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.114.146.117 (talk) 01:53, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopaedic wording 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 17:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Rear projection effect →  – Reverse the redirect per WP:CONCISE As discussed briefly in 2008 and 2015, this is the natural title (if not , perhaps that is MOS:ENGVAR?) 85.67.32.244 (talk) 11:14, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 July 2021