lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2nd King Edward VII's Own Gurkha Rifles (The Sirmoor Rifles)

message: Correct Penultimate title is was 2nd King Edward's Own Gurkha Rifles, (The Sirmoor Rifles.) (So-designated January 1st 1906.) (The postnominal possesive ['s] is never tacked onto the sovereign's numeral).Previous title since 1901 was 2nd (the Prince of Wales's Own) Gúrkha Rifles (the Sirmoor Rifles).--FwdObserver (talk) 20:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But The numeral is included when the sovereign is subsequently succeeded by another of the same name.--FwdObserver (talk) 03:10, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 
Error in
 Title

message: :2nd King Edward VII's Own Gurkha Rifles (The Sirmoor Rifles) → 2nd King Edward's Own Gurkha Rifles, (The Sirmoor Rifles) — [The sovereign's numeral is erroneously included in the title of this page. In the authoritative Indian Army List the regiments designation from 1906 was 2nd King Edward's Own Gurkha Rifles, (The Sirmoor Rifles.). Other regiments so distinguished with the sovereign's name follow the same custom in omitting the royal numeral:- 26th King George's Own Light Cavalry, 14th King George's Own Ferozepore Sikhs, 61st King George's Own Pioneers,130th King George's Own Baluchis (Jacob's Rifles). ] --FwdObserver (talk) 10:44, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: But the numeral is included when the sovereign is subsequently succeeded by another of the same name.--FwdObserver (talk) 03:10, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:2nd Tangier Regiment

message: I propose merging with King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster) as
#They are the same regiment 
#There is nothing in this stubby article that is not in the one on the King's Own
#They were only known as the 2nd Tangier Regiment for four years 
#It is consistent with the article on the other (1st) Tangier Regiment which redirects to Queen's Royal Regiment (West Surrey)
Lozleader (talk) 16:24, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merger
Talk:28th (North Gloucestershire) Regiment of Foot

message: I don't see anything in here about them being part of the ARW. Can Anyone confirm this? Adamdaley (talk) 06:03, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Revolutionary War 
Talk:Hamlet (1964 film)

message: This sentence is very unclear one:
And this version of Hamlet is a shameless fraud who scare people around with fake ghost to gain power.
Is it Hamlet who is a fraud, or is it this version of the play, or what?—Vitriden 17:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Can't understand this sentence

message: I just put the essay into better English, but some puzzles remain. The sentence questioned above I think I clarified, but what about the "mechanics" that Hamlet enjoys accompanying? These must be the Players. And isn't he carried out onto the battlements, dead, at the end, rather than going out under his own steam? I haven't seen the movie (which seems to be hard to get), so someone should continue to correct my corrections! Jrmccall 17:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, he does walk out to die outside - and there is then a funeral march as he is carried out of the castle.  I have just added some material, and references, as well as deleting a few things which were either not relevant to the film, or misreadings of the cited refs (e.g. the bit about the imprisonment of Pasternak and Smoktunovsky which is actually contradicted by other sources).Lampernist (talk) 22:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Certain Puzzles
Talk:Chris Shiflett

message: surely the author of the shiflett's page is wrong when he says he was born in 1990! hes younger than i am if thats true!
the Official Foo Fighters website says 05.06.71. In fact i think I will change it. its now 1971.
User:PJB
Someone needs to add some sources for the playing style section. I know most of what is said there is true, and I totally agree, but there are no sources.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.246.245.154 (talk) 18:21, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Chimera of Arezzo

message: I know the spelling "Chimera" is favoured by many, but is the statue actually officially called Chimera of Arezzo or Chimaera of Arezzo?  violet/riga (t) 11:14, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chimera/Chimaera

message: It seems like there are some debated data in the article, see it:Discussione:Chimera di Arezzo. /Johan Jönsson 18:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article by Ugo Bardi in the References covers the territory, namely the political usefulness of the Etruscan chimera to the Medici Grand Dukes, and the memory of Giorgio Vasari recalling the date of discovery as 1554, when the Arezzo archives actually make it November 1553— an easy error to make, eh, several years after the fact. Benvenuto Cellini's brief reference is also quoted by Bardi, if anyone feels that the material should be better worked into the body of the article. --Wetman 05:52, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Critisiscm of data in article

message: "le fortificazioni" were translated as "the tranches", but from my understanding fortifications are defensive walls or mounds. Can someone explain further please? Bobbybuilder 02:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation
Talk:Robert Ritter von Greim

message: The artificially colored portrait of the field marshal, with skillfully added Ritterkreuz, is a moving tribute to the last chief of the German Luftwaffe.
Perhaps a filter could be added to make it look more like an oil painting. Or a slight halo effect.
79.138.132.83 (talk) 22:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, the image was over the top. I replaced it with another one from commons. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:12, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Portrait
Talk:Ujazdów Park

message: Contrary to what my faithful shadow Ghirlandajo suggests in the edit summary, it's not megalomania. Especially that the park is rather small. As to one of the most modern parks - it's rather obvious, as the usage of reinforced concrete in bridge construction was invented the year before the one in Warsaw was constructed (in 1894, in Viggen). Also the use of artificial asphalt was a novelty at the time. Halibutt 11:18, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Norberto Fuentes

message: Is this the same Norberto Fuentes that's linked to at List of Cuban comic creators? 惑乱 分からん 11:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There are several prominent men of this name, hence the disambiguation page.  Should we assume that the author is meant?  Rlquall 22:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which William Kennedy? 
Talk:Sibylline Rock

message: "The Sibylline Rock was the rock at Delphi, on which the Delphic Sibyl, or prophetess, breathed in the vapors from the Castalian Spring and predicted the future. The Sibylline Rock can still be seen today."
No, there is no "Sibylline Rock" at Delphi. There are no "vapors from the Castalian Spring": that was where one stopped to wash ones hands. This little stub is completely bogus. Can we get it deleted, as a start to cleaning up the mess about Sibyls? --Wetman 11:24, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Washington, Baltimore and Annapolis Electric Railway

message: I was thinking we should pull the A&ER and the A&B Short line out of the WB&A. I've only just started.
Cranor 00:59, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was wondering about this statement: "The Westport tunnel, its southern portal is visible just north of the B-W Parkway's Annapolis Road exit." I assume "Annapolis Road" refers to Highway 175, not Highway 450. Correct? -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 22:34, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now I see that Highway 648 is also called Annapolis Road.  All three cross the B-W Parkway. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 22:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tunnel
Talk:Ancus Marcius

message: There's a disagreement between the information in this page and the information on the Numa Pompilius page. Numa is the father of Ancus Marcius; on Numa's page, it's stated that Ancus Marcius was murdered. The information there (on Numa Pompilius page) is controversial in the sense that it first says that Ancus Marcius was a popular king, but they later (near the end of the page) imply that he was not as good. The information must be reconciled there and in this page. CarlosRibeiro 11:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello, I am a student editor working on the WikiProject Biography. I will be editing this article soon, adding additional information on Ancus Marcius that I have come across. Feel free to undo my changes if you find them unsatisfactory, but I believe my information is all from reliable sources so that should not be a problem. MetaFeta777 (talk) 23:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  student editor working on the WikiProject Biography
Talk:Cud (band)

message: I wrote the Cud bigraphy on H2G2 cited at the bottom of the page, but I am no longer happy with its accuracy. Sadly I cannot alter it there. --Amdsweb 12:03, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Josh Groban tweeted 10/9/10 about Clubterranean and S.S. Validation.  An Internet search on "Clubterranean" led me to a page that connected this word with Cudband.  Does anyone understand Josh Groban's tweet in this regard and can they explain it here?  He does tend to like obscure musical groups, so I suspect the tweet was related to this band.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skysong263 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  clubterranean
Talk:Satisficing

message: Is "satisficing" a portmanteau? When I first heard it, I figured it would be a portmanteau between "satisfy" and "sacrifice". I was going to edit this information it, but after reading the article, I'm not sure that it is correct. Does anyone know?
Phasmatisnox 00:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: portmanteau

message: This article is missing key citations.  For example, the book where Simon introducing satsificing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.101.242.138 (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: I don't get the part about HAL. I don't see how HAL's behavior supports the idea that satisficing is a primarily human behavior. If anything, it does the opposite -Domokato (talk) 21:19, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HAL 

message: I had a quick skim through Novus Ordo Mass and I don't quite get the connection.  Any thoughts? --Slashme (talk) 05:54, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Novus Ordo?? 

message: This article is well written and informative, but it needs inline citations. LK (talk) 19:43, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rating 

message: I agree that the attribution to Simon seems inadequately supported. The earliest use of the term that i'm aware of is by Roy Radner in 1975: "Satisficing," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 2, 1975, pp. 253-62.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.43.69.162 (talk) 20:29, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations Again 

message: Is there a particular reason why a multipage summary of EST (a very recently proposed theory, from a single doctoral dissertation from the University of Calgary) is in this article on a Nobel Laureate?  
There are many hundreds of such dissertations which expand Simon's work; unless EST is judged to be a breakthrough contribution which dramatically changes the public's view of Simon's work, I would think it would be better placed in an article of its own and, if particularly noteworthy, a brief pointer to it would suffice.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:405:4400:DF50:48B2:A10C:3B40:EFEB (talk) 16:12, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is EST section of appropriate length for this article?
Talk:Wayfinding

message: The book recommendations, while useful, do not belong in the body of the article.  They should be placed in a new "Further reading" section, formatted appropriately, with ISBNs.  See Help:Referencing for beginners#Using refToolbar for a tutorial on how to efficiently add a complete book reference to an article.  Particularly note description of the "Citations for "Further reading" section", which is directly relevant to what is needed.  Reify-tech (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Further reading
Talk:Mili Avital

message: So she lived few years in America, Is it make her American? --Haham hanuka 12:36, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: 12 years is hardly a few years. She lives and works on two coasts and is locally married. gidonb 13:04, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: American citizen

message: This banner has been added to aid project coordination. It was added using AWB, the automation of which could not place the banner at the top; please help by doing this manually. --Albotim 02:37, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stargateproject
Talk:What's the time, Mr Wolf?

message: In the Netherlands (one of those low countries) the game is not generally known as '123 piano'. Instead, the game is known as "Annemaria Koekoek". The "What time is it Mr. Wolf" game is in some variant known in the Netherlands as "Etenstijd" (in English: Dinnertime).
--Oldenboom (talk) 20:51, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

message: Shouldn't this page be named "What's the time, Mr. Wolf? instead of "What's the time, Mr Wolf?"? LukePhiladelphia (talk) 18:51, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Page Name

message: Fgurc hi of B hi t yv Osman pic 82.153.173.83 (talk) 15:29, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korcb
Talk:Veterans for a Secure America

message: I'm wondering whether this is notable or not. I will investigate the links today.... --Habap 12:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not being a political junkie, I don't know if this is notable or not. I looked at the links and they all appear to be recent, but I don't know if that affects the notability of a political organization. I'm marking it for expansion. --Habap 21:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: The VSA is an organized group.
fighting dems is a term used to described all non incumbend veterans running for Congress as Democrats. grazon 19:52, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Merge
Talk:Jean Taris, Swimming Champion

message: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3961069598745909226 --93.104.83.183 (talk) 15:00, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  dead link
Talk:Alice in Sunderland

message: The previous version of this page, now marked as a potential copyright violation, was contributed by the owner of the page that you're concerend about. I plan to notify him so he can come by and give permisison himself.
Marypcb 20:04, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:141st Signal Battalion (United States)

message: Anyone know why the article was changed to 7th Signal Troop? It was changed without comment or discussion, and seeing as it was a major change, from 141st Signal Battalion, it probably bears some explanation. --Nobunaga24 06:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the title change? 
Wikipedia talk:Discussions for adminship/Lar

message: Oh goodie, I get to be the first penguin off the icefloe. Hope there aren't too many sea lions. My very own Struggle session! This isn't a "real" nomination in that if there is consensus I will nevertheless not be an admin (I will decline to serve) but it is real in that I am desirous of helping this proposed alternative or replacement process get better and more refined, and real in the sense that I am very interested in comments, especially those that by being constructively critical, will make me a better editor and better wikipedian. So let me have it! Don't hold back. I started the ball rolling by editing in some of the things I did (and immediately commited a faux pas by signing that)... but that's it from me for that section, the community should reshape it till they are happy with it. ++Lar: t/c 13:31, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

message: So is this dead in the water, or are you going to open yourself upt voting polling, Lar? I admit this is the first I saw it, I was gone all weekend and then the squids went crazy today. -- nae'blis (talk) 23:02, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poll
Talk:History of rail transport in Poland

message: Something on this topic would be useful. Presuambly someone has expert knowledge of this. Norvo (talk) 07:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardization of gauge on major routes after 1918-21 

message: The number on the front beginning with a Cyrillic P it is a Russian engine, obviously. Thus, unless running on Warzaw & Viena rails, it must be wide gauge. In old East Prussia wide gauge only existed on border stations. The present wide gauge network in Kaliningrad oblast is the product of the adaption to Soviet rail since 1945.
Therefore, the title wants a proof.--Ulamm (talk) 15:44, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  image "Broad gauge locomotive in East Prussia" 

message: How could the rolling stock of Warsaw–Vienna Rail and Warsaw–Bydgoszcz Rail be relocated to Russia in a hurry? They had European standard gauge.--Ulamm (talk) 19:42, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  rolling stock of the Warsaw–Vienna in WW I 

message: With Warsaw–Vienna Railway geographically situated in Russian Poland as well as  Cracow–Upper Silesian Railway (also a genuine Polish enterprise) in Austrain Poland, called Galicia and Lodomiria, the present semi-regional structure of the presentation is not useful. I'd prefere an almost chronolocical structure, but I refuse to do the work of a complete restructuration.--Ulamm (talk) 17:28, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure of this article 

message: There is anything about closing of local lines in 1980s, 1990s and early 2000s, and anything about lines stealed by Red Army in 1945 and 1946. It all looks like railways in Poland was only developed, but there is anything about decline of railway net and decreasing number of lines which was closed and demounted since last 40 years.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.254.253.18 (talk) 23:02, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  'White spots' in history
Talk:Trygve Lie

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 19:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: "generally not regarded as being intellectually superior."  This seems a bit strange. It is generally not necesary to inform readers that the articles subject is not intellectually superior. Unless the aim is to imply that the person is intellectually inferior. I suspect that might be the aim of this suntynce. This is the only place I have heard of such a claim about Lie. If it is true that he was generally belived to be less intelligent than most people, then a serious source has to be quoted. I will remove the statement, and it should only be put back with proper sourcing.Inge 13:44, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: comments

message: According to the memoirs of the British diplomat Sir Brian Urquhart (obits in the papers today), Lie was found to have visited a Geneva brothel calling himself "Rodney Witherspoon", and was known behind his back as "Rodney" thereafter.Paulturtle (talk) 07:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rodney
Talk:Steve Strange

message: DELETE.  Briefly full of nonsense and now just a blank page.  The latter is an improvement on the former, but deletion would eclipse both. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matt.whitby (talk • contribs) .
:I've just undeleted it. Prior to the vandalism, which I didn't restore, the article was about a new-romantic singer. Unfortunately that wasn't clear without looking at the edit history. Leithp 13:28, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Sex Pistols Gig in Newport was on 23.12.1977 and not in 1976.--77.24.174.103 (talk) 20:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Sex Pistols]] 

message: On the main part of the article, his birthday is listed as May 28, but to the right of it is listed as April 28th. Stopde (talk) 19:34, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: According to his autobiography, it's May 28th. 88.104.19.163 (talk) 14:48, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Also on his funeral's order of service. 217.155.200.241 (talk) 02:08, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  April or May? 

message: I have removed Categories "Bisexual Men" and "Bisexual Musicians" as it is unsourced. Although Steve Strange has made it clear he has been involved with both men and women in the distant past, there is nothing to support that he identifies as bisexual now. It is probably better if we simply leave the Category "LGBT Musicians" on the article instead as this is more emcompassing. 88.104.19.163 (talk) 14:53, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bisexual category 

message: Surprised no mention of Strange's nights at Billy's club in Meard Street. Isn't that where the new romantic thing started? I seem to remember it was Steve Strange's club one night and Stevo Pearce's Futurists on the next. Perhaps someone with better recall for dates and details could add something? The Blitz was so-named because the premises (in Covent Garden) had previously been a restaurant with a WWII/Dad's Army theme serving pie & mash. I think it's now Brown's nightclub.Twizzlemas (talk) 19:53, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billy's? 

message: I wonder if we really do need to keep that peculiar live shot, but if you all like it, leave it in. I really dislike it. Steve has "red eyes", too. -andy 2.242.253.115 (talk) 15:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main image 

message: This source from The Guardian gives his  name as "Steven John Harrington". Can anyone find a birth record at FreeBMD? I'm unable to. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:11, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The V spelling was a common assumption throughout his life. Only at his funeral was the Stephen spelt out on the order of service which can be found online, here – https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2991701/1980s-stars-Boy-George-Martin-Gary-Kemp-pay-respects-funeral-New-Romantic-icon-Steve-Strange.html 217.155.200.241 (talk) 02:19, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  First name 

message: Cannot understand why such a long life story is allowed to stand with so very few citations in support of its fundamental facts and numerous chapters. 217.155.200.241 (talk) 02:19, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  This whole biog is shockingly under-cited
Talk:National Model Railroad Association

message: I'd like to help remove some of the 'citation needed' annotations in the standards area of the article, but in most cases I'm at a loss as to how to go about substantiating these claims (the veracity of which are largely indisputable in the mind of most anyone associated with the model railroading hobby).  NMRA has had a 'product conformance program' for decades; in the beginning it was a big deal and empirics suggests that it was key in bringing most manufacturers to a common level of rolling stock interoperability.  But as far as I know, there's no principal, citeable source to support this 'fact'.
On the other hand, I'd argue that the somewhat patronizing comparisons to British and NEM standards should be removed from the article as they lend nothing positive to the discussion.
Blbachman (talk) 20:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've added the section titles as a mean to provide better linking to this article. Granted, this article could be improved significantly, but the sections help provide a framework. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 18:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections
Talk:West Scandinavian Norwegian dialects

message: 148.122.231.168 wrote correctly (in the article):
The distinction between West and East Scandinavian is a bit misleading when it comes to Norwegian dialects, and is not typically emphasized by Norwegian linguistics. There is no dividing line between one and the other, and there is general recognition that influences have come from several directions.
I turned this into a redirect to "Norwegian dialects".
--MaEr 14:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged