lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Leo J. Ryan Federal Building

message: Trishm 11:54, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review note 

message: Sorry guys - I've reviewed this at WP:ARCHPR I'm delisting on the grounds it's not broad enough in it's coverage of the building itself (3a). --Mcginnly | Natter 09:45, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I agree with Mcginnly, it is a decent article, but it simply doesn't have sufficient coverage of the building. Perhaps some more information as was suggested in the Peer Review would be beneficial. Lsi john 21:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Delilsted
Talk:New Zealand TR class locomotive

message: This site closed 6 February 2009. As owner of the site and the content therein I assert my right to insert this content into Wikipedia pages and re-license it under the GFDL.PatrickDunfordNZ (talk) 03:17, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Text copied from NZ Diesel and Electric Traction site

message: The original basis for the NZDET article was the lists from two sources which omit two subclasses in particular: A&G Price TR 38 type, and Hudswell-Clarke ex-PWD type. As such the NZDET sourced tables omit these subclasses. PatrickDunfordNZ (talk) 03:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Class information excludes some subclasses

message: I think this article should be split along the same lines of the NZR RM class articles for rail cars. Thoughts? --Lholden (talk) 23:57, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed split

message: I have added Tr's 1, 4, 5, 6, 7, 40, 41, 42, 46 to the Rolling Stock list. I don't think they were in NZR service. If anyone finds out of the above 9 locomotives, you can remove them if you guys want. NZ Rail 150 (talk) 23:37, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added TR's 

message: I'm not sure that the list of "Non-NZR" Tr's should exist on the page, especially in the tabulated form - in the case where a locomotive has actually assumed a fictitious NZR identity (i.e. Price 198/Tr 119) I can see merit in noting it, however some of the locos listed shouldn't be under this section (for instance Price 213 - it is painted in a Fruit Salad Type livery but the cabside number plates simply have the number "213", it is not trying to be a "Tr" in the same way as Price 198; meanwhile, Eb 26 was a legitimate NZR Tr and should be included in the actual table rather than the "Non-NZR Tr's" table. Personally I also find the inclusion of the Howard at Plains Railway and the Husky at Oamaru dubious, as they also are not trying to be NZR Tr types although for some reason they have gained a Tr style classification at their home railways at some stage. Thoughts? 117.18.80.18 (talk) 21:20, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: "Non-NZR" Tr's

message: There appears to be a major gap between the KiwiRail loco lists from 2011 say is in service and what this article says. Can anyone shed any light?
The KR list says:
:1 Drewery (TR 56)
:5 A&G Price
:5 Hitatchi
:7 NZR
For a total of 18, plus one leased to an industry. --LJ Holden 01:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  TRs still in service 

message: This should be simplified. Given we can easily convert metric to imperial and vice versa, then it makes sense to me to merge the two tables and have both imperial and metric measurements. --LJ Holden 23:18, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, it just seems like a waste of space otherwise. pcuser42 (talk) 05:56, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Cool, I started working on it at lunch today but then had to do actual work... haha --LJ Holden 09:46, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Done... bit of a nightmare --LJ Holden 20:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specification table
Talk:Edmonton Investors Group

message: I know they also owned the Bulldog / Roadrunners AHL franchise.  Didn't they also own the Edmonton Trappers at one point, or was that Peter Puck?  I know the Eskimos bought the Trappers for a while. Kevlar67 05:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Assets 
Talk:Rocky Juarez

message: I'm surprised this page doesn't mention that Rocky's known for his left hook, he's often referred to as "Mr. Left Hook." He's also one of the rare little men with one-punch Knockout power.
You might be thinking of Jeff "Left Hook" Lacy. --Zacharymcgovern (talk) 13:33, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rockys Houston Facts
Talk:Interim Biogeographic Regionalisation for Australia

message: The wikilinks seldom link to the right area. For instance, Arcadia should be Arcadia (click each link if you don't see any difference). Ben Lomond should be Ben Lomond. Carnarvon should be Carnarvon. Pentecost should be unlinked, as I couldn't find an article for this meaning of "Pentecost". Whitsunday should be Whitsunday - I think (certainly not a religious holiday). And so on down the page, including some like Flinders where I couldn't even guess which Flinders was intended. Art LaPella 23:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, Carnarvon should be Carnarvon and Pentecost should be Pentecost. Okay, I'll sort it out. Hesperian 00:07, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Hesperian 00:36, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: links comment

message: IBRA7 has been released and data from IBRA6.1 has been updated to reflect additions of several new regions and subregions. In the compilation/entering of the data, it became apparent that the data may lend itself towards the creation of a wikitable; something along these lines. Feedback would be appreciated. Thanks Rangasyd (talk) 12:30, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds okay to me. Hesperian 12:48, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: support SatuSuro 15:19, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thoughts about move regions and subregions to a table 

message: Many of these blue links are wrong, either linking to dab pages or to mountains or other features of the same name. I have fixed one, making it red. Please check if my chosen article name is OK. Cheers. Downsize43 (talk) 10:35, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikilinks to subregions 

message: This page currently has quite a few issues, that I can't fix right now.
* The data is incomplete, with various entries not have areas.
* The subantarctic islands are not in Vic/NSW. (Macquarie is in Tasmania, the others are external territories, I believe)
* The NSW North Coast section has html bugs (showing align=right for instance).
Quarrel (talk) 16:34, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Issues
Talk:Conservation district

message: on the official website of conservation districts it states there are NEARLY 3000 districts. In this article it state sthere are OVER 3000. Where is that information from and why is it different?
:Good question. That's definately worth looking into. But does anybody care enough to do it....? MisplacedFate1313 (talk) 08:00, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:French submarine Favorite (Q195)

message: Yeah, I know it's underwikilinked. Could use some help with that. Also infobox appreciated (can never get the hang of them!)
Thanks alot, Anonymous Dissident 05:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I marked a comment as dubious. She couldn't have been scuttled in Gdynia (or Gottenhaven, as the Nazis call it) in May 1945, primarily because there have been no Germans there for a month or so. After a period of heavy fighting in the area the town (and the port) were occupied by the Soviets already in April... Any sources? //Halibutt 21:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scuttled in May 1945 in Gdynia? 

message: The sentence "He [Lange] lost command due to the loss of the boat [in October 1943]" seems to make no sense as it stands. Did Lange lose this boat (Q195) to allied attack or in an accident? If so how did another German commander take command? Or maybe he "lost" it during a training exercise (see Career section) meaning that another German vessel "captured" the submarine? Either the sentence is wrong, or the article is missing information. I've tagged - clarification needed.
Thanks --Cje (talk) 10:49, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commanders
Talk:Natural Heritage Trust

message: I've spent a bit of time upgrading this article, hopefully now representing what it encompasses. I'm still unsure abou the best name, but the legislation underpinning the account which funds the programs still exists, so I've stuck with the orginal name for now (with added redirects). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:21, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Change of name?
Talk:Newspaper riddle

message: "For German, she gives this example, which again, like Italian, requires white and black to be in the reverse order:[3]
    Q: Was ist rot, schwartz und weiss?
    A: Die Tageszeitung "
white and black are not in reverse order, schwartz is black, weiss is white.Colmfinito 22:36, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  German 

message: I've heard "A nun in a blender" as a sort of dark-humored answer to this joke. B7T (talk) 01:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The Trayvon Martin case? InedibleHulk (talk) 09:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another alternate literal answer
Talk:Walnut Bend, Houston

message: * Section 1:
** Voided map: http://books.tax.hctx.net/v092/AE1997_92-1_0064.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v092/AE1997_92-1_0064.pdf
** Map in use (replat): http://books.tax.hctx.net/v092/AE1997_92-1_0065.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v092/AE1997_92-1_0065.pdf
* Section 2: http://books.tax.hctx.net/v092/AE1997_92-2_0017.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v092/AE1997_92-2_0017.pdf
* Section 3:
** Notes that it was resubdivided in 1964: http://books.tax.hctx.net/v095/AE1997_95-2_0004.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v095/AE1997_95-2_0004.pdf
** http://books.tax.hctx.net/v095/AE1997_95-2_0005.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v095/AE1997_95-2_0005.pdf
* Section 4: http://books.tax.hctx.net/v094/AE1997_94_0099.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v094/AE1997_94_0099.pdf
* Section 5: 
** Plate 1: http://books.tax.hctx.net/v095/AE1997_95-2_0053.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v095/AE1997_95-2_0053.pdf - Walnut Bend Elementary is indicated on the Section 5 map as Reserve "B" 5060 Acres Unrestricted
** Plate 2: http://books.tax.hctx.net/v095/AE1997_95-2_0054.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v095/AE1997_95-2_0054.pdf
* Section 6: 
** 1982: http://books.tax.hctx.net/v096/AE1997_96_0176.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v096/AE1997_96_0176.pdf
** Plate 1: http://books.tax.hctx.net/v096/AE1997_96_0177.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v096/AE1997_96_0177.pdf
** Plate 2: http://books.tax.hctx.net/v096/AE1997_96_0178.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v096/AE1997_96_0178.pdf
* Section 7: http://books.tax.hctx.net/v097/AE1997_97_0075.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v097/AE1997_97_0075.pdf
* Section 8: http://books.tax.hctx.net/v098/AE1997_98_0099.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v098/AE1997_98_0099.pdf
* Section 9:
** http://books.tax.hctx.net/v098/AE1997_98-2_0066.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v098/AE1997_98-2_0066.pdf - Sewage treatment plant site indicated
** Replat: http://books.tax.hctx.net/v098/AE1997_98-2_0067.jpg and http://books.tax.hctx.net/BlockBooksPDF/v098/AE1997_98-2_0067.pdf - Sewage treatment plant site and U.S. government drainage ROW indicated
* "WALNUT BEND TH" is listed, but no maps are found
WhisperToMe (talk) 21:40, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harris County Block Book maps
Talk:Hilton San Francisco Union Square

message: I'm having a helluva time finding good sources going into detail on the Brutalist design - I can ask some people when I stay there in the near future, but I know anecdotes and word of mouth don't work as references, so that is only useful to guide research in the right direction. If anyone knows books hidden in Google, that might help? DPedersen (talk) 22:18, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I just looked for abuot half an hour trying to find any connection online between "San Francisco Hilton" or "Hilton San Francisco Union Square" with "brutalist" or "brutalism," and could only find forums. All I can think is that maybe there is some coverage in old architectural magazines not online, I'm assuming the design was a big deal when it debuted in the 1970s. DPedersen (talk) 17:05, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brutalism?
Talk:Tangata whenua

message: Could the writer of the article kindly list your references?
125.238.74.212 18:32, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listing References 

message: I couldn't find out where the Tangata when are originally from.  Need to expand the intro.  Sorely in need of more references.  I'm going to put a reftage on this.  Dinkytown 15:22, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: One good resource for references on Aotearoa/ NZ topics is Te Ara, the official encyclopedia maintained by the NZ government (https://teara.govt.nz/en/about-this-site). For example, here is a search for "tangata whenua" on Te Ara: https://teara.govt.nz/en/search/teara?keys=%22tangata+whenua%22 --Danylstrype (talk) 07:18, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand the intro and references 

message: Whomever started this page (and the en.wiktionary.org equivalents) inaccurately inserted a macron in the first word. "Tāngata" is a pluralised form of the singular "tangata", and is primarily employed with the indefinite article "ngā".  The pluralised form is used for indicating groups of more than one person.  As an example of its use, Ngā Tāngata Taumata Rau, 1941-1960 is a collection of biographies about many individuals.
"Tangata" defines personhood and is, therefore, an identity marker.  It can be used to indicate an 'individual person'.  However, it can also be used as a collective noun for groups of a single identity, such as "tangata whenua"" and "tangata tiriti" ".  I will be recommending a redirect to a new page with the correct spelling.
::--Te Karere (talk) 11:55, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccurate use of macron 

message: In Tagalog (Philippines) the people of a particular place are called the 'tag banua' and there is an ancient tribe known simply as Tagbanwa derived from this phrase.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8003:336F:DF00:655A:EBCA:3DE4:E1F6 (talk) 09:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Austronesian cognates
Talk:Elefant Records

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.elefant.com/history. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:36, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: The majority of the article was plagiarised from http://elefant.com/page/1/About%20us so I have removed the offending material. It was promotional and inappropriate anyway. It may be almost 5 years since the warning above but it still stands. We can't have plagiarised material in Wikipedia. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:46, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 2 

message: I don't speak Spanish but the Spanish Wikipedia article looks a lot like it contains the same sort of promotional material that I just removed from here. If you speak Spanish well enough to edit it then you might want to take a look and see if you can help. --DanielRigal (talk) 18:51, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heads up for Spanish Speakers
Talk:Mosque of Cristo de la Luz

message: — Assignment last updated by Emoakes (talk) 22:52, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Arts of the Islamic World
Talk:Russ Building

message: The reference to Manhattanization feels like inappropriate editorializing. The Manhattanization article itself says it’s a pejorative. I live in San Francisco and I personally think that the addition of other buildings has been a positive development. I can’t seem any reason for the addition of other buildings to be cast in negative terms (which is not to disparage Manhattan, an excellent place). A reasonable edit might be, “Due to the construction of other skyscrapers nearby, …” 173.73.28.8 (talk) 04:47, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Manhattanization”
Talk:Synagogue of El Tránsito

message: As part of a group project, my team and I edited this Wikipedia page and add sub-sections under the History of the Building and Architecture sections. We also added an image and updated the lead paragraph. In doing this work, we used 9 peer-reviewed sources that are all included in the References section. Sumayadaghestani (talk) 20:04, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits to whole page 

message: Is there a way we can remove the blank spaces between the lines of the long quotes in the "Hebrew and Arabic Inscriptions" section, while still imposing a consistent format? Or some other way to condense the quote? Currently, the section is unnecessarily long simply from all the spacing. I tried fixing it one way by deleting the spaces and manually inserting a line breaks () instead, but it resulted in some inconsistencies. R Prazeres (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reducing blank spacing in quotes
Talk:Jacob ibn Habib

message: I intend to add he was a Palestinian rabbi to the lead, as the category has been removed by Debresser. Chesdovi (talk) 10:56, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See Category talk:16th-century Palestinian rabbis that such an edit is rejected by many editors. If Chesdovi will make such an edit, he will therefore be reverted forthwith. In addition, he is WP:FORUMSHOPPING here, so please leave your comments at the discussion I linked to. Debresser (talk) 11:23, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Palestinian rabbi 

message: A 5 part Vilno edition of Eyn Yaaqov is here:
Is also in a 5 part Vilno edition:
https://hebrewbooks.org/47602
https://hebrewbooks.org/47607
https://hebrewbooks.org/47603
https://hebrewbooks.org/47604
https://hebrewbooks.org/47605
100.15.127.199 (talk) 03:43, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  external source
Talk:Joseph ibn Shem-Tov

message: The Library of Congress authority file gives:
Ben Shem Tov, Joseph, ca. 1400-ca. 1460
with a citation to the following:
Crescas, Ḥ. Sefer Biṭul ʻiḳre Notsrim, 1990: t.p. (Yosef Ben Shem Ṭov) added t.p. (Joseph Ben Shem Tov [in rom.])
Probably the same person; this would mean he died 20 years earlier than Wiki article suggests. Not sure if this justifies changing categories--FeanorStar7 (talk) 07:48, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date
Talk:Julian of Toledo

message: There is a move request at Talk:Julian_the_Apostate#Requested_move_2 to move Julian the Apostate to Julian. Since this involves the question whether that Emperor is the primary (much more used than any other) meaning of Julian, the views of watchers of this page would be welcome. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:12, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move notification
Category talk:Rappers from the San Francisco Bay Area

message: Some of these rappers are from oakland and sf. the title should be changed to bay area rappers.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.189.14.2 (talk) 18:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oakland, California is included in the San Francisco Bay Area, so I think it's okay. Stepheng3 (talk) 05:16, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Oakland
Talk:Josep Comas i Solà

message: The surname "Solá" is written wrongly, it's Solà (with "open" accent). This surname is catalan and in this language the accentuated form of "a" is always "à", never "á".
:Is Solá an older convention?  The comet named after him is written Comas Solá rather than Comas Solà, suggesting that Solá might've been used at the time.  Otherwise, it would be an odd error Nik42 (talk) 23:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake
Talk:José O'Callaghan Martínez

message: There is a misspelling. His name was not "Joset", but "Josep"! --81.38.182.40 (talk) 22:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Though in all his publications and references to  them it is José, so moving it there.--Ihutchesson (talk) 05:12, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Juan Valverde de Amusco

message: Second link is broken. Third link as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.174.73.114 (talk) 16:24, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk:Proposed bans of LGBT-themed books in the United States

message: The title of this article at the time of writing is "List of proposed anti-gay book bans in the United States"- suggesting that it lists proposed bans on books opposing the LGBT community- while the article itself is about "proposed bans of lesbian or gay-themed books in the United States." While most of these ban proposals are made by (if I may have an opinion here) homophobic assholes, this is a bad title for the article. Request move to a more appropriate title. Hppavilion1 (talk) 03:22, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree fully Hppavilion1. I also think it should be moved from "gay" to "LGBT", it covers books banned for featuring transgender themes too, without any real same-sex contact so "gay" does not seem like an appropriate title, (not to mention some lesbians do not identify as "gay" either).★Trekker (talk) 10:21, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: That's not actually what I was getting at - I meant that the title implies it's a ban on books which are anti-gay, rather than a ban on books motivated by anti-gay tendencies - but that's actually a very good point. Not sure what a better title would be though. Hppavilion1 (talk) 20:28, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: I know what you mean, I just added another point.★Trekker (talk) 23:22, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

text: Thank you!★Trekker (talk) 07:31, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{tick}} Confusing title 

message: What does 'banned' mean? Under the First Amendment, a book can't really be banned. Do we mean they were challenged? When? Where? What was the outcome? Do we include books that were challenged in a single library or school, or does it need to be a wider scope? Are they included if they were challenged but left on the shelves? This article, as it stands, is almost completely meaningless. Bkatcher (talk) 19:18, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is ridiculously confusing and uncited