lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Mechamorphosis

message: {hangon}Keep as Google search yields hits. This subject is legit. [[User:krispymann25|krispymann25] 13:56 (EST) Jan 18, 2005.
:Piedras grandes has been leaving similar messages all over, don't panic. This editor has also left welcome messages on talk pages and Afd's, if that gives you an idea. KillerChihuahua?!? 23:33, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Keep'''
Talk:Marine geology

message: * The Acoustic Monitoring Project performed continuous monitoring of ocean noise since 1991 using the U.S. Navy Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS) network and autonomous underwater hydrophones. 
Subjects monitored are Ocean Seismicity (hydroacoustic monitoring allowing detection and precise location of small submarine earthquakes and volcanic activity), Bioacoustics (underwater acoustic methods used to study the distribution of large whales in the open oceans), and Environmental noise (the effect of noise, both man-made and natural, on marine life.) RJBurkhart 23:04, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NOAA [[PMEL]] Network Processors  

message: — Assignment last updated by Sharleen Lawrence (talk) 03:02, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ERTH 4303 Resources of the Earth
Talk:Music and Video Club

message: Off the top of my head, the reason it was called the Music and Video Club, is like as with e.g. Matalan there was a membership card scheme, which I believe gave you a tiny discount. The shop has left very little behind on the internet though so I can't find a source for this. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 18:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Model
Talk:Hawfinches in Britain

message: This page is part of a series on the statuses of birds in Britain. In ornithological matters, Britain is generally accepted as referring to the island of Great Britain and neighbouring islands, but not the island of Ireland and its neighbouring islands, due to both political and zoogeographical considerations. The series uses this definition, and hence it would be inconsistent to expand the scope of one article to cover a different geographic range. Alternatives could be to cover the material in an articles on Hawfinches in Ireland, or if it is felt that there is some merit in distinguishing north & south, then an article on Hawfinches in Northern Ireland might work. I think it would be better to think about the subject as a whole though - would a series for Ireland or one for Northern Ireland be better? Or would a joint series on Britain and Ireland be the way forward? If there are strong views on this, then lets move the discussion to the Category talk page SP-KP 18:02, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Humphrey of Hauteville

message: Abagelard (or Abelard) is not Humphrey. Abagelard is one of its two sons (Abagelard and Herman of Hauteville, sons of Humphrey). Calabria Geoffrey 18:19, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, but watch that you do not remove useful info in the process of fixing it.  Also, try to make sure the English is better or ask for help in translation and syntactical structure if the edit is large enough. Srnec 05:18, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Children
Talk:EMD SD18

message: I took an axe to almost everything in the preservation section because it was unsourced and I could not find any sources. I was only able to find a source for the Lake Superior Railroad Museum, so I kept that content. If anyone can find references for what I removed, you can restore it with said references. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:15, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preservation section
Talk:Brian McGuire (racing driver)

message: "He travelled over from Australia with Alan Jones but did not enjoy his countryman's success." Where did he "travel over" to? The UK? 
This is just one example of an open-ended and unreferenced "fact" from this article which contributes to it being (when read out of context of any related motor sport articles) hard to read, with confusing details, and no sources referenced.
I would recommend the { {cleanup-importance} } tag being returned to this article.
: Point taken on the "travelled over" sentence - yes, he travelled over to the UK from Australia - article adjusted to this effect.  Open-ended? In what sense?  Hard to read - I don't accept that.  Apart from the fact that very few people without a scrap of knowledge of the sport would be reading it anyway, everything is clear.  It's daft to precis the history of motor sport in the context of Brian McGuire's involvement for the sake of a very minor article.  Confusing details?  Like what?  I'm afraid I just can't see what anyone might find confusing about it.
: Unreferenced yes, but this information is available in practically any F1 source with the appropriate scope.  I could pick one at random but I feel it would be rather perfunctory.  There are dozens and dozens of similar articles on racing drivers that do not quote sources for such general information.  Bretonbanquet 00:31, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "He travelled over"? 

message: I'm proposing that McGuire (Formula One), the page about McGuire the constructor, should be merged with the driver article. The constructor article is a one-paragraph stub, and to be honest, I don't think it can grow much. McGuire wasn't actually a constructor, he only modified an existing Williams FW04 which he raced himself, mostly in British events. That was less than what Arturo Merzario and Hector Rebaque did. --Pc13 (talk) 19:34, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I agree. The two lines from the McGuire (Formula One) article can easily just be added to the bottom of the driver article. Schumi555 (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree too - neither article is ever going to be a long one, so merging would be a good bet. We can always redirect from McGuire (Formula One). Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:12, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to say redirect too, sounds like the best option. Schumi555 (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds fair to me. Pyrope 21:32, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging
Talk:Egg timer

message: Narrowly a Start class.
Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 20:35, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Time/Assessment|WikiProject Time assessment rating]] comment 

message: Barbara Shack 18:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Mount Wrangell

message: I was looking for material on locations around Wrangell and saw , and also  in the search result....didn't see where to fit them into the article, other than to note they're not already cited; just thought it was interesting that USGS has an official name for the caldera itself....Skookum1 (talk) 02:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: GNIS refs
Talk:Baten Kaitos: Eternal Wings and the Lost Ocean

message: An editor just attempted to split out content from this article to create a series article. However, the general consensus has been that a series article is not necessary unless there are at least 3 games. We really just have 2 actual games, and upcoming bare bones remaster, and some minor bits about an aborted third entry. Additionally, this article is currently nowhere near needing a WP:SIZESPLIT. Sergecross73 msg me 12:20, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Oppose There are times when splitting a topic into more articles only makes it harder to follow, and this is one of them. It makes sense to have an article for the game, and an article for the follow-up. The cancelled entry is best dealt with in a paragraph. As an aside, I think the Left for Dead franchise article is pretty poor, and an ineffective way to organize the topic, but that's WP:OTHERSTUFF. Shooterwalker (talk) 12:58, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article and an attempted series article split ([[Baten Kaitos (series)]]) 

message: https://gonintendo.com/contents/22946-bandai-namco-was-originally-against-the-name-baten-kaitos - Hopefully other websites will report on this. Sergecross73 msg me 02:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: https://www.nintendolife.com/news/2023/07/baten-kaitos-title-was-initially-disliked-by-bandai-namco Sergecross73 msg me 11:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2023 sources
Talk:Business wear

message: This appears to have been introduced as an attempt to advertise a pornographic web site.  Since the subject and even the article name is probably legitimate encyclopedia fare, I left it in - but now it's in need of cleanup. —Wknight94 (talk) 18:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Questionable intention

message: Non-American business wear
How changes in fashion and sex differentiation have altered the business wear landscape
Chieftain 23:34, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs information on
Talk:Neurofibromatosis type I

message: Please, choose another photo, it's weird seeing a naked child on a Wikipedia page. 83.51.185.85 (talk) 20:56, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not censored. I've added a tag at the top of this talk page, including options for you to hide images if you don't want to see them. In this case it is important to view freckling of the groin area. It is theoretically possible to censor it in a way that the groin area may be seen without showing the genitals, but I'd ask Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine first. Mikael Häggström (talk) 22:06, 26 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed, that's child port right there. Take it down or censor the rude parts like you did with the eyes 122.148.233.48 (talk) 14:43, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Frankston South, Victoria

message: An Elite government school? Errr I dont think so.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.29.146 (talk) 23:00, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I forget why I put that there. I'll remove it. ozzmosis 08:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This doesn't look right to me - Mt. Eliza is not due West?  --Commking 23:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you talking about the table?  The majority of Mt Eliza is west of South Frankston. ozzmosis 06:24, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Mmmm.. yeah.. From some parts of South Frankston, going West takes you into the bay.. where do we measure from? --Commking 01:10, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I chose the geographic centre. --ozzmosis 09:26, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm the one that started this, and I pretty much did it so that it would register that there is a Frankston South. I wanted people to correct and update it so I knew it was being viewed. Thanks for doing so! -- User : Guest|Valmothg 17:07, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Frankston Suburbs
Talk:Paul Posnak

message: Some of the text is a bit too clsoe to that on  and should be reworded a bit lest it be tagged as a copyvio. DES (talk) 18:37, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cambridge High School, New Zealand

message: Surprisinlgy, given the inclusion of wikipedia pages on some very banal NZ schools, there was no page on Cambridge High. So I started one. Most of the interest surrounds Alison Annan, of course. To be done: details of Cambridge High before, during and after Annan; Cambridge High and the NCEA; Cambridge High and school governance in NZ. If you know any of the details on these topics please add them. The impression that I get is that the Annan 'regime' (for want of a better word) was devisive, and it certainly attracted a lot of controversy, so please keep to WikiPedia's usual high standards and cite your sources.Neil Leslie 21:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved from talk page after redirect page created
Talk:Index Fungorum

message: Moving material from entry to Talk page. It is inapprporiate in the entry itself but may give valuable advise:
:Note that a 'name' just corresponds to a scientific description of a species, genus, or other taxon which was published at some time - most of these names are no longer used. 
:If you look at the entries for some genus in Index Fungorum (example: search for genus Lactarius) you will see that just a few entries are green (valid names for currently accepted species), a few entries are blue with a green equivalent given (obsolete synonyms which may still be in use), and the great majority are just blue (generally long-forgotten descriptions which have minimal further interest).
:Since fungus name changes bedevil the study of mycology, especially in the contexts of Wikipedia, Wikispecies, and Wikimedia Commons, the Index Fungorum is a very useful resource in order to know the correct current names.
Brya 18:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  2006-01-18 

message: Index Fungorum is in two parts, the historical list of all well-defined fungus names "Index Fungorum" and the subset of these which is currently validly in use "Species Fungorum", which has a different search page.  It is very important to understand the difference when using the two related sites and I added a paragraph to try to explain it.  Sometimes Wikipedia editors are confused and refer to the old species names as being in Index Fungorum, but if they are not in the Species Fungorum part they are not sanctioned as current.  My opinion is that fungi in Wikipedia should follow Index Fungorum.  That means that they must also follow the Species Fungorum part; the main "Index Fungorum" part does not distinguish which names are currently valid.  Strobilomyces (talk) 11:54, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species Fungorum
Talk:Rock Swings

message: His previous album is set there as Times of Your Life (1975). That leads to his single.
In 'Comeback' section his main article is a sentence: His 1998 album A Body of Work was his first new U.S. studio release since Walk a Fine Line in 1983. So there should probably read A Body of Work (1998), or what? 85.217.22.170 (talk) 15:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Hambros Bank

message: This needs to be restructured so that the current position is made clear in the introduction. Carina22 18:56, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Loads of work to do with that article, I started in in connection to the article about Erling Dekke Næss, and have been thinking of improving it, but if you care to I will keep away - I am not that into banks and such. Ulflarsen 19:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Iconfactory

message: This article seems neutral to me.  I didn't see any hyerbole or endorsement.--Esprit15d 18:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: npov

message: Might a list of competitors be appropriate? --216.161.168.31 (talk) 18:35, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Competitors 

message: Just cleaned up the intro section by splitting most of the historical content into a separate history section. Removed the sales section - don't think it was relevant. I also think the software descriptions could use some rewording to sound less like an ad, as does the last sentence of the history section.
Inchkev (talk) 04:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modified sections
Template talk:Ayyavazhi

message: This template should complament Template:Ayyavazhi large better as they are showm on the same pages.  As it is now they are too silmilar and where they differ they often leave red-links!  It should be more in the templates on Hinduism  The series temp is smaller and deals with broader issues and the topic temp has lots of detailed links--Birgitte§β ʈ Talk 19:08, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Richard Tarlton

message: Adding "unverified" to a 1911EB-sourced article is stretching a bit. One could ask for more up-to-date sources, but nobody working on WP today has sufficient standing to impugn the quality of 1911EB statements. Stan 19:09, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Replaced main article picture with a new one. This was the old one:
—Preceding unsigned comment added by DionysosProteus (talk • contribs) 2007-08-28T01:22:02
Did he die in 1588? Other sources say 1615. He would have only been 20.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.17.169 (talk) 00:29, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New picture
Talk:Voiced alveolar and postalveolar approximants

message: I don’t know if anyone’s noticed, but in Turkish, the r is pronounced as an alveolar or postalveolar approximant when it comes before a plosive, for example in the word artık. 
So maybe let’s add it to this page as an allophone in Turkish? TheNewLetters (talk) 16:58, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkish? 

message: If it does, please make a “Turned R” page. EmeraldEnd84 (talk) 12:03, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no uppercase equivalent of ɹ, at least not in Unicode. —Mahāgaja · talk 15:02, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does this symbol have an uppercase version? 

message: argued that dentialveolar approximant would be my original research, well I am not sure but I have seen some Chinese linguistic graduate student using "prealveolar approximant" [ɹ̟̍] in their blog to describe the Chinese flat-tongued apical vowel because the stereotypical rhotic alveolar approximant is acoustically too different from that apical vowel but sounds closer to retroflex apical vowel. Of course saying a dentialveolar approximant to have a passive place of articulation sharply at the edge between your teeth and your alveolar ridge is not possible, but I don't think use the term "dentialveolar approximant" to emphasize the sound to be neither close to interdental/front dental nor close to the Dahalo-like "alveolar tending toward post-alveolar" may cause any problems. I have no idea why Sol505000 considers the distinction between apical postalvelar and apical retroflex to be founded while dentialveolar to be unfounded, and I would promote the ExtIPA [ð͇˕] for Dahalo language apical-alveolar series instead of [ð̠˕] because the current usage of [t̠] and [d̠] in Dahalo language is not quite accurate. --146.96.36.47 (talk) 02:04, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Denti-alveolar
Talk:Pure cinema

message: Would Jim Henson's Time Piece be another example of this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.27.143.179 (talk) 15:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: another example?

message: I was bold and deleted the assertion that 'pure cinema' was "coined by Europeans", a phrase that struck me as both unreferenced and so ambiguous as to be meaningless (which Europeans are we talking about?). --Fang Aili 19:19, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "coined by Europeans"

message: i'm not sure if this should be classified as "pure cinema"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.216.111.113 (talk) 18:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "bicycle thieves"

message: What's with the references? The format is unacceptable, isn't it? I'm going to talk to the creator of the article to see if he can clarify what he meant by these. 99.246.82.233 21:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: Based upon the Dictionary of Film Terms: The Aesthetic Companion To Film Art by Frank Eugene Beaver which considers "Cinéma pur" and "Pure cinema" the same thing, I will go ahead with the merge.--CaroleHenson (talk) 00:34, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Mary Vivian Pearce

message: :Mary Vivian Pearce is a real-life beauty currently living in Baltimore, Maryland. She sometimes works as an artist's model. Slender and youthful, Mary Vivian relentlessly devours books in the City that Reads, and can be spotted riding her bicycle to the Enoch Pratt Free Library. Her radiance has many, many admirers.
This just sounded weird to me, and since it's unsourced, I took it out.  Find a source if you want to put it back in. NickelShoe 19:26, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved paragraph

message: I added this its my first markup hope its ok. Mjpresson (talk) 01:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Filmography

message: Any source for this? Lovingboth (talk) 19:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'American expatriates in Nicaragua'?
Talk:Bedford, Ohio

message: The history section has no sources, this should be fixed. Scientific Alan 2(Click here to talk)(What have I done?) 16:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: History has no sources
Talk:Humita

message: Merge discussion on Talk:Tamale Rmhermen 19:47, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Milton, Queensland

message: Being that there is an article on Milton, NSW and Milton, SA as well, I think Milton, Australia should link to a disambig page.  There is already one for Milton, though, so I'm wondering if one for Milton, Australia would be appropriate? -VetteDude 19:51, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It certainly can't hurt. Sounds like a good idea. -- Adz|talk 00:22, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hopefully I did it right :) -VetteDude 18:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Milton, NSW

message: I can not believe this requires talk page discussion (let alone that I've received two warnings for removing this , but here we go: I don't think that the presence of a new brewery merits mention as a town attraction. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A brewery 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting/Userboxes/Scout

message: Merge, because not all Scouts are members of WOSM or WAGGGS, there is a related userbox template that is non-specific to any organization. (it uses a defunct and generic Scout fleur-de-lis so as to avoid any trouble with copyright, just like they did for the bald eagle rather than the badge for the Eagle Scout userbox) Chris 19:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps using the WOSM flag would be troublesome, given the above explanation. The merge target however, states '..and contributes articles to preserve their history.'. While this won't be applicable to everyone, the most suitable solution in my eyes would be the replacement of the image only and keep the distinction. --DJiTH 21:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: New version at Wikipedia:WikiProject Scouting/Userboxes/Scout/sandbox that will replace a number of current userboxes. Please comment. --—— Gadget850 (Ed) talk -  20:56, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:Jia Xu

message: The title may be a bit odd, but come on now. Jia Xu was regarded as one of the most brilliant minds of the Han. I wonder why there is hardly anything said about him.--Zhang Liao 04:29, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you mean in the English Wikipedia, we only have a few regular contributors here who are any bit interested in Chinese history, so the poor quality should be expected. And if you mean in real life, well, Jia Xu was brilliant, but he wasn't really that interesting compared to legendary characters like Zhuge Liang and Sima Yi. Aran|heru|nar 06:20, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The UnderDog of the Han
Talk:Family Feud (video game series)

message: Added more information of the year the video game was published. I added the "Later versions" section, in which I explained about the 1998 version of Family Feud, staring former host Louie Anderson. SkinnerIJA 19:59, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions

message: One thing that this page is missing — and a question this article should answer — is how players entered their answers. Somebody should provide this information. [[Briguy52748 (talk) 20:55, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  How answers were entered