lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hard rime

message: I've uploaded in the Commons a distinctive photo of rime ice; I propose to use this as an example of rime ice.
--D o m e 20:07, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the section about a place in China where rime frost can be observed.  It was a) written in a very unencyclopedic manner and b) didn't really offer much in terms of significance to the article at hand.--Dmz5 06:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tourist attraction? 

message: I propose that Soft rime and Hard rime be merged into Rime ice, since they are related concepts with minor distinctions. Each would have its own section. The earlier page split resulted in dividing one concept into two that have very little distinction, except in degree. User:HopsonRoad 13:27, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that is a good idea for convenience. It is an aeronautical term also and I got confused when "Rime Icing" wasn't a thing. User:TheWindWaker13 17:22, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Klbrain (talk) 22:59, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Fort Columbus

message: Why is this a separate article from Fort Jay? Shouldn't this just be a redirect to a merged article, which would mention that it was known by different names at different times? - Jmabel | Talk 04:23, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why a separate article?

message: Since they are about the exact same fort, I am proposing to merge this article into Fort Jay. Discussion is welcome. RobDuch (talk) 21:31, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. Same place, same thing, different name? Nahhh. Merging will make upkeep easier, avoid an POV /content fork, and eliminate duplication between two articles.  At least a third of the combined articles are redundant.  Anmccaff (talk) 02:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge into Fort Jay
Talk:Fort Jay

message: Interesting note: Fort Jay is heavily featured in the last part of the video game Freedom Fighters. The player characters shoots up the place, running under, in, around and on the structure, killing bad guys. Lots42 (talk) 02:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional Appereance 

message: Since the articles are about the exact same fort, I am proposing to merge Fort Columbus into this article. Discussion is welcome. RobDuch (talk) 21:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge complete. RobDuch (talk) 03:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with Fort Columbus 

message: For what it's worth, the photo captioned "10-inch Rodman guns" is clearly actually the 15-inch gun (left) and one of the 10-inch guns (right), as the larger 15-inch (visibly different construction details, not to mention the scale difference) is placed at the centre of the three guns in the "pointy" part of the star shape. BleedingUranium (talk) 05:33, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rodman gun photo
Talk:Dark Island Castle

message: I apologize for the slightly vague references on the additions involving the castles time on the real estate market in the early 90s.  It definitely appeared in the luxury real estate magazine Unique Homes on the few times I had picked it up during that time period (for amusement).  I just remember being stunned that such a thing was on the market.  I can 100% confirm it's Singer/Dark Island caste because I saw photos on the web.  I also wish I could give hard numbers on the price change, although this much I can say: it dropped from something in the range of $12m USD to $3m USD in about five years.  Bobak 20:18, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for it's time on the RE market
Talk:Alex & Emma

message: Is it correct protocol to substitute "and" for an ampersand? The film is called Alex & Emma. TheMadBaron 11:01, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved this article. Except where technical limitations present an obstacle, film titles should always maintain their original spelling/punctuation in article titles. Rje 17:43, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: This entire section is simply terrible and should be rewritten by a native-English speaker. Autodidact1 (talk) 19:53, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot

message: Are there any cites for it being "modeled after" Audrey's film? I'm watching it now, and the ideas of the movies are strikingly similar, but I'm afraid that w/o a cite it is a OR and ought to be removed. Carl.bunderson (talk) 09:08, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Paris When it Sizzles

message: It should either be USD or $, but not both. Would anyone care to fix this? Thanks Kvsh5 (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  USD$ 
Talk:Taizé (disambiguation)

message: I added some text to the Taizé Community page which is linked on the front of this disambiguation page. 
Sarum blue 17:47, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I just moved this disambiguation page to Taizé (disambiguation) from Taizé, its prior location. By far the most common use of "Taizé" is the "Taizé Community". For example, the town has just over 100 people, but the Community has many thousands of visitors, up to 6000 in the peak week. Many more articles link to the Community than to the town. (There are also currently two redlinks to other towns in France). Colin MacLaurin 09:10, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Oscar Schmidt

message: Oscar Schmidt is a famous American manufacturer of stringed instruments used in traditional music. Perhaps his most famous (or perhaps infamous) instrument was the Autoharp.  The company began building instruments in the late 1800s and continued to be profitable until about the time of the Great Depression.  I suggest that an entry be made for Oscar Schmidt (the company).  How would one best go about this task?  Thanks.
--Oberobic
03:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Musical Instruments

message: Category:Shooting guards?  on Spanish Wikipedia is Alero , the Portuguese language Ala. (english: Small forward).--Sokac121 (talk) 11:21, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: I'm a Wikipedia n00b just learning about doing references. This is my first attempt. It looks OK, but the link is formatted off the URL as if it were a title. Not sure how to fix this - could someone take a look and let me know? Thanks!
Raddick (talk) 12:04, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please look at reference style?
Talk:Alan Dedicoat

message: It sometimes seems that 'Saturday Night is Dedicoat Night' as he seems to be on every programme on BBC1!
Alan worked as a volunteer with Birmingham Hospital Broadcasting Network to get presentation experience before joining the BBC.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C6:EB96:801:39CD:B4AD:D466:14A (talk) 12:29, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Burgundian School

message: Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. Agne 03:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, since the "references" are in a "references and further reading" section, there's no way to assume anything is referenced at all I think :/. Homestarmy 13:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote everything from the sources listed.  They are all "references."  Antandrus  (talk) 06:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA Re-Review and In-line citations 

message: You have all four "references" listed under a "references and further reading" section, there's no way any reader can tell easily which is which, for all I know, content which the real references once referenced has long since been deleted. A "Further Reading" section represents a section where a reader may look at things and read them on their own time, but these things aren't actually used at all by the article, so you can see how this is a problematic reference situation. Homestarmy 13:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I changed the section head, and added some cites.  I don't know what you are talking about regarding "deletion" -- I wrote the article and nothing has "long since been deleted."  Antandrus  (talk) 06:29, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

text: A year and a half later, I tried reading your comment again, and it makes no sense at all.  "for all I know, content which the real references once referenced has long been deleted."  Did you even bother to look at the edit history of the article?  Did you bother to notice that one person wrote it?  Did you bother to ask that person about the references?  Is "GA review" anything other than a pointless and destructive exercise in bureaucracy? Antandrus  (talk) 12:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisted GA
Talk:Dragon Boys

message: I know such compound words lose their hyphens eventually, but "miniseries" just looks weird. I kept reading it as "ministries" at first which was a tad confusing. Therefore, I think it'd probably be better to spell it out as "mini-series". However, I never again will waste my time arguing something as inconsequential	as Wikipedia articles so you guys ultimately can do what you want. 70.66.9.162 11:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Wikipedia's official usage is "miniseries" so that's why it's spelled without a hyphen. There needs to be some sort of uniformity in the spelling. And no, we do not just do what we want to articles, but rather we have to follow certain spelling and writing guidelines; these are meant to reduce confusion, by using only the "accepted" spellings already available. Not that I like that idea all the time, but that's the way it is. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 15:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh well, I thought that might be the case. Thanks anyway. 70.66.9.162 21:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The word "mini-series"
Talk:Ben Bagley

message: I removed the following section as it is not really useful in this article.
===Profiled in...===
:*Playbill
:*The New York Times
:*New York Magazine
:*After Dark
:*Show Music Magazine, by Ken Bloom
:*BBC Radio, by Sheridan Morley
:*Theatre Magazine
*Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 20:35, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed section

message: :*Playbill
:*The New York Times
:*New York Magazine
:*After Dark
:*Show Music Magazine, by Ken Bloom
:*BBC Radio, by Sheridan Morley
:*Theatre Magazine
*Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 20:35, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Profiled in...
Talk:Malum prohibitum

message: I removed the reference to same-sex marriage as malum prohibitum.  In most jurisdictions, a marriage between two people of the same sex is either (1) prohibited or (2) does not constitute a crime or a tort.  The fact that many jurisdictions do not affirmatively recognize a same-sex marriage for civil purposes does not render the conduct of performing or entering into such a marriage malum prohibitum.  Thus, this is not adequately illustrative as an example.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.174.69 (talk) 22:05, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: > Ultimately, malum prohibita and malum in se are cultural definitions, due to the fact that evil is culturally defined
This is a moderately controversial statement with some political implications. I can't think of an improvement right now, alas.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lambyuk (talk • contribs) 21:07, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and reverted.  It seems to be talking about the common confounding of cultural relativism with moral relativism.  Those are topics unto themselves.Legitimus (talk) 21:39, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cultural definition of evil 

message: If you are going to request additional references you (obviously) must cite what you are requesting a reference for. Webjedi (talk) 05:13, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Refimprove Improvement Needed

message: * breaking and entering
    * indecent exposure
    * littering
    * trespass
    * usury
    * voyeurism
Not so sure about these -- they seem a bit murkier in that there is someone else "injured" by them.  —Casey J. Morris 20:36, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malum prohibitum? 

message: When Malum in se and Malum prohibitum both spend a lot of space talking about the other, perhaps it is time to merge them.
:I vote nay. Webjedi (talk) 05:04, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: "As malum in se is related closely to the defense of natural rights (underlying rights discovered by the evolution of non-statutory law), malum prohibitum restrictions, as, for example, the American Fugitive Slave Law of 1850, are sometimes seen as imperiling rights."
After a brief period of editing what I thought was the problem with this sentence, I decided to just remove it because I don't understand it. Perhaps it could be better sourced or verified, though it seems a little too evengelical for an encyclopedia.Mneumisi 17:49, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do not remove things simply because I don't understand them. However, I concur that the sentence needs verification as the difference between natural rights and civil rights is a subject of great controversy. Webjedi (talk) 05:03, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: removed sentence

message: "Malum prohibitum" can also mean "forbidden apple". "Apple" and "evil" are homonyms in Latin, for most tenses. --76.217.81.152 19:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative translation
Talk:Repetition

message: I'm surprised no one has commented here. So, um, I'll start!:)
Should the opening sentance (and I really like that there's only one) say "immediately occurred before" or "before in the same context," to avoid confusion? Mayhap it's a little too vague the way it is.
:Repetition need not be immediate and may occur in a different context. Those things help make repetition perceivable, but do not make it possible. Hyacinth 10:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vague intro?

message: Equinox (talk) 12:30, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "mesodiplosis" redirect here?
Talk:WD Austerity 2-8-0

message: Dutch 4300 series numbered 4301-4537, but 53 of these were withdrawn in 1946, and 2 in 1947:
* http://homepages.cwi.nl/~dik/nederlands/openbaar_vervoer/mat/d/0/04/046/0465.html
* http://homepages.cwi.nl/~dik/nederlands/openbaar_vervoer/mat/d/0/04/046/0465.html
That leaves 181 which were withdrawn 1949-1959.  And that out of a total of 935 leaves 5 left, probably to Sweden. — Dunc|☺ 20:37, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dutch locos

message: I propose the merging of BR ex-WD Austerity 2-8-0 into this article. Neither is particularly long, and most of the WD locos ended up with BR. --Redrose64 (talk) 16:56, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, no no.  The BR ex-WD Austerity 2-8-0 article describes those taken into stock by BR.  The WD Austerity 2-8-0 describes those in stock by the War Department.  Although all of the former belonged originally to the latter, they are different classes because they are owned by different companies (and one which is not a successor to the others).  See for example how the British Rail Class 77 is separate from NS Class 1500.  Thank you for your understanding. 18:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

text: strongly oppose.  This is about the type in general, and the background and War Department service in general.  Once they were transferred out of WD stock, into stock of other companies - NS (and onto SJ), BR, KWCR.  This needs to be about the type in general, WD stock.  They should also eventually list all of them, which will take a lot of space. Tony May (talk) 15:00, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I've stuck a  on the statement  because the Ramsbottom DX Goods of the LNWR totalled 943. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:51, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most-produced class 

message: I see we have :Category:WD Austerity 2-10-0 and I was about to create :Category:WD Austerity 2-8-0. However, it might be better to broaden it to :Category:Wartime 2-8-0 locomotives and include ROD 2-8-0 and USATC S160 Class. Please discuss. Biscuittin (talk) 08:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  New category? 

message: "On 2 July 1941, a locomotive of the class was hauling a freight train..."
Surely this can't be correct, as they were only produced from 1943 onwards?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.138.241.10 (talk) 13:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not correct, the loco was an 8F. I've moved the entry to LMS Stanier Class 8F#Accidents and incidents. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:58, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Accidents and incidents
Talk:Bamber Bridge

message: I have decided to expand upon the existing stub and take away some of the more unsubstantiated remarks. I live in the village and have access to primary and secondary sources. Charlie odd 17:51, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 
Talk:Lynn Schenk

message: Before 1993 the 49th district was not "the 41st district".  Only part of the 41st was included in the 49th.  In fact, Bill Lowery ended up in the 51st district and ran, unsuccessfully, against Randy "Duke" Cunningham in the 1992 Republican Primary for the 51st. Dananderson 20:51, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Districts 

message: This is an unauthorized biography of Lynn Schenk.  If Ms. Schenk ever becomes interested in having her biography on Wikipedia, she will provide accurate information herself.  
I think it is irresponsible of Wikipedia to allow unsubstantiated information to be published without impunity and to allow strangers to engage in a back and forth debate on the merits and character of people they do not know.
Please delete entirely- that is without being placed in your "deleteopedia".
[This section (above) was added at 13:21 on 15 May 2010 by User:98.218.195.163 (Talk).]
: There are ways to ask for articles to be deleted.
: However, as it says at the top of this page, this article must conform to the following:
:: "This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if there are other concerns about the biography of a living person, please report the issue to the biographies of living persons noticeboard. If you are connected to the subject of this article and need help with issues related to it, please see this page."
: If somebody thinks the article does not conform to the above, then remedies can be made.
: If one wishes to discuss (or, ultimately, change) the above guidelines, steps can also be taken. Trafford09 (talk) 16:36, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  DELETE LYNN SCHENK'S PAGE 
Talk:Cog (project)

message: Cog isn't an acronym, and nowhere in the article is it capitalized like one, but I can't figure out how to change it in the title? --81.6.234.170 21:03, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it to MIT Cog project from MIT COG project. --JWSchmidt 00:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cog isn't an acronym 

message: I think Cog is in a museum now?  Shouldn't this be more of a report on the project with summaries of what was learned instead of "progress so far"? --Jaibe 10:52, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Their web site is so very unclear on this, but the above does seem true. --Amit 01:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

text: There's no current development of Cog. The project is on a "permanent hiatus". --Tirolion 11:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project over? 

message: In line with Wikipedia's style, and taking into account the official name of the project which is just "Cog" instead of "MIT Cog", I've moved this page from "MIT Cog project" to "Cog (project)". --Amit 01:02, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to "Cog (project)"
Talk:Llucmajor

message: What is the pronunciation of this name? And what does it mean for a church to be elevated to a "villa"
Rmhermen 21:11, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Pronunciation is one of , , , or . o in   a stressed syllable in Catalan can be either open-mid  or close-mid ; and word-final r is silent in some words but not in others (rather like French), and I don't know if this is one of them. As to the second question, the German original from which I translated this is not clear at all what it means to be "elevanted to a 'villa'" or even whether it was the church or the town itself that was so elevated. Angr/talk 21:36, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Neurological examination

message: When was the MRC grade for muscle strength first introduced? JFW | T@lk 21:15, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe I have a book at home that can answer this question. -Ikkyu2 01:14, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I believe it was first published in 1943, in the first edition of Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system, Medical Research Council War Memorandum No. 7, 1943.  The current edition of this, which I believe is the fifth, is absolutely required reading for every neurology resident; it was deemed so important where I trained that a copy was purchased and given to each resident. Ikkyu2 06:13, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, I am not sure what should go into an article about the neuro exam directed to the lay audience.  As well as a neurologic practictioner, I am something of an amateur historian of the exam, and I am not sure that makes me the best arbiter of what to include here. Ikkyu2 20:49, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

text: I guess.  I think I'm pretty far from being able to bring an NPOV to bear on the neuro exam, though; learning about it has occupied most of my professional life. Ikkyu2 00:44, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  When 

message: JAMA: Historical entry re examining vibration sense. JFW | T@lk 00:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vibration

message: I've done a fair bit of work on this article this evening, i'm now trying to find references to cite currently unsubstantiated claims throughout the article. Hopefully will be a solid B class by the end of tomorrow. Regards, CycloneNimrodTalk? 21:03, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Under construction

message: It seems to me that muscle testing is 0 to 5 and not I to V?see http://www.eatonhand.com/clf/clf311.htm.
thank you--Nicobzz (talk) 16:55, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Muscle testing

message: Romberg test is not a test of cerebellar function.  Keeping it under that category propagates the confusion.  Romberg tests vestibular, ocular, and sensory (epicritic sensation).  2 of 3 are required to maintain balance.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.85.247.19 (talk) 01:47, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romberg test