lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Filtration (mathematics)

message: The concept is more general than the sigma-algebra case, though.
Charles Matthews 08:28, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sigma-algebra case 

message: There appears to be an anomaly in the article. The definition mentions 
"... subject only to the condition that if i ≤ j in I then Si is a subset of Sj" 
whereas in the groups subsection of Examples in Algebra mentions 
"A filtration of a group G, is then a sequence Gn of normal subgroups of G which is decreasing in the sense that for any n, we have Gn+1 ⊆ Gn." 
According to the first statement, it should have been Gn ⊆ Gn+1.
Tsachin 13:16, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need clarification 

message: It would be nice to have some mention of I-stable module filtrations (for some ideal I), and how any two I-stable filtrations have bounded difference and hence induce the same topology (which is, of course, the I-topology).
128.148.41.116 (talk) 23:39, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That is the Artin-Rees lemma. Joeldl (talk) 06:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I-stable module filtrations 

message: I have come across filtrations in proofs of the decidability of modal logics (in Chellas's book, e.g.).  Are they an example of the same thing?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.131.24.208 (talk) 17:14, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modal logic connection? 

message: Is it still right if t \in \{0,1,\dots,\infty\}? The whole idea is in infinitesimal increase. --Igor Yalovecky (talk) 15:12, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right-continuous filtration 

message: The introduction currently has the definition:
::if i\leq j in I, then S_i\subset S_j
but doesn't the correct definition use \subseteq instead? That's even used further down in the mention of a descending filtration.
Gfredericks756 (talk) 14:58, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strict Subset 

message: The redirect Filtered ring has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Jay 💬 09:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Filtered ring]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Category talk:Children's games

message: How does one decide which games belong in the sub-category of "Traditional" children's games, and which are just children's games? Aren't "I Spy" and "Musical Chairs" traditional? Is there really a need to distinguish between traditional and non-traditional games, and if so, wouldn't it make sense to tag the NON traditional games seperately? --Woggly 08:51, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I think a category "Nontraditional children's games" would be... weird. I think I Spy and Musical Chairs are indeed traditional, and should be recategorised. Children's games that are plainly not traditional perhaps could be subcategorised -- "Children's computer games", "Children's board games" etc. There could be overlap between these and the "Traditional" category but that's not a bad thing. Lupin 10:28, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: But why not just leave it "Children's games"? What is the added value of "traditional"? --Woggly 10:37, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: conversation from 2004
Talk:List of association football competitions

message: I removed the old divisions of the Football League - there's enough leagues listed under England already without confusing the matter with 6 extinct divisions too. Whole leagues that are extinct I've left in. sjorford 09:16, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added the Schweizer Cup and the Emperor's Cup. If you know of any other competitions that are not mentioned here, please add them, or you could also check the pages "Football in [insert country]" if they mention any other competitions not listed here (that's how I added the two cups).Crix 18:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding more competitions 

message: I think that the idea looks good on paper, but the user will likely not use it as it is rather forgettable, especially when it comes to the shades of colours etc. This article will never be finished as the majority of the competitions don't even use the feature, making it rather useless. In my opinion, I think that it should be removed, along with the tables.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nabulowa (talk • contribs) 22:03, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: The colours look to violate MOS:COLOR, as they're being used as the sole way to portray information. Change the tables/headings so it's clear which are male/female senior/youth events, and we don't need the colours at all. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:55, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: One way to solve the problem might be to put a note on the color. Miria~01 (talk) 23:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  A suggestion to remove the colour indicator system 

message: The Friendship trophy is not an international tournament since it's between two English teams. Might be true for other tournaments as well. 2003:CB:1F0B:AE01:3074:FD06:31F2:D361 (talk) 07:35, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friendship Trophy not international
Talk:Katina Paxinou

message: In 1900, Greece had not yet converted its calendar to the Gregorian (NS), and was still using the Julian (OS), which at that time was 13 days behind.  So the 17 December date for Katina Paxinou is either:
* the actual OS date as recorded in her birth certificate, which would translate to 30 December in NS, or
* it has already been converted to NS and the date recorded in her birth papers was 4 December.
Does anybody know either way? JackofOz 09:17, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text:  Anybody?  6 years is a long time to wait for even a "No" response.  Thank you.  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  11:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: For what it's worth, I note the Greek WP article has her being born on 15 December 1900, but still with no indication of which calendar this was from.  --  Jack of Oz  ... speak! ...  11:48, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Which calendar?

message: I couldn't verify that the museum was notable. There is no Greek WP article that we can expand from and this has been tagged for notability for over 7 years, plus on User:Boleyn/List of museum articles tagged for notability with no one establishing its notability. I think the alternative to deletion is to give it its own section in this article. Sending WP:APPNOTE to creator  and  who first tagged it for notability. Boleyn (talk) 13:45, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[Paxinou-Minotis Museum]] to here 

message: Please be advised that ancestry.com is explicitly WP:USERG. I changed the statement supported by that source about her DOB as it conflicted with the seemingly WP:RS biography that supported her death and birth date.   Toddst1 (talk) 18:14, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crappy sources
Talk:Peace churches

message: I redirected the "Peace Church" article to "Peace Churches", which already included all the information from the "Peace Church" article, reproduced here in its entirety:
Peace church, or the historic peace churches, designates those Christian denominations that have opposed the use of violence, and in particular participation in war, on the grounds that it is opposed to the teachings of Jesus.  
The best known of these groups are: Mennonites, Brethren in Christ, Quakers, Amish, and the Hutterites.  Many members of these churches are conscientious objectors to military conscription.
The Jehovah's Witnesses are also opposed to military participation, but are not usually grouped with the historic peace churches.
mennonot 09:41, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: redirect

message: I still think that the fact that conscription in the U.S. ended in 1973 is relevant.  However, are there people today seeking discharge on the basis that they have joined or otherwise been converted to peace churches or other pacifist faiths or philosophies after volutarily enlisting?  This is an important issue if true.  It has been established that conscientious objection is no basis for failure of young men to register, because the concept is that if conscription were ever resumed, the exegencies regarding its relationship with c.o.'s could be worked out at that time, and that in any event the mere act of registration does not in any way imply a waiver of the right to apply for c.o. status if conscription were to recur.
Rlquall 18:48, 11 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conscientious objection in the United States today
Talk:Bell (disambiguation)

message: This article needs breaking up. Bell telephone, and cowbell don't belong on the same page. Lupin 10:31, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 2004

message: Please don't blindly put bell when you should have  bell.  Hopefully some people will find this when they are creating pages.  I've knocked the Bell disambig down to 120 or so from the 180 ... will take some more time later to try and do more.
On another note, I'm all for having the bell as a disambig, and not directly going to the bell instrument page.
--Rbeas 02:58, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Read this f you are writing "bell" 

message: Stumbled on a link to Bell from jellyfish (Gonionemus) ... what about using bell as bell-shaped, does that need a wiki?  I.e., list of bell-shaped objects?--Rbeas 03:33, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bell shape? 

message: I've added "The Bell", the Nazi experiment to conquer gravity . . . I don't know much about this though, so someone else could create the article.--Codenamecuckoo 08:15, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Bell" 

message: There are many articles under Bells, which I believe should be split into a separate page with appropriate cross-references.  When looking for the Bellingham Bells or Edgar Allan Poe's poem, a reader shouldn't have to wade through many dozen "Bell" articles. Matchups 05:17, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bells split

message: I removed A  Bell Bird, ancestor of the Do-Do bird, exstinct due to inept ability and laziness as possible attack plus Google says no such critter.--Dakota ~ ε 23:20, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bell Bird

message: Article titles containing the word "bell", complete listing at http://www.wikiwax.com/ as of 08:55, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: More bells

message: If Bell is used fo a middle name it should not be included in the dab page. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:43, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More bells - reply

message: what section do they belong in? 67.176.160.47 (talk) 17:07, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  clan bell 

message: Why did you lock it with the Palin reference in place?
71.235.78.170 (talk) 03:45, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed that; thanks for the heads-up. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sarah Palin (OK, really someone who listened to Stephen Colbert) struck this article again.  But it got fixed. http://thecolbertreport.cc.com/videos/uvi91o/paul-revere-s-famous-ride Alden Loveshade (talk) 03:49, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request from 71.235.78.170, 7 June 2011
Talk:Island Davaar

message: At the most recent census (2001) it was inhabited - see pop stats in List of islands of Scotland--JBellis 19:48, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  not uninhabited 

message: "The crossing can be made in around 40 minutes."  That on foot, in a car, or what?  86.138.44.237 (talk) 18:03, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: on foot - each way  Finavon (talk) 19:09, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  40 minutes? 
Talk:Biproduct

message: A more accurate summary of the not-entirely-coherent spiel that I wrote here earlier might be: shouldn't we mention that biproducts can be defined in any semi-additive (i.e. commutative-monoid-enriched) category?
Puffinry 13:12, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I've added this to redirect people looking for byproduct, which is commonly mis-spelt as biproduct or bi-product.  I've copied the format of a page that also had a disambiguation page, but as this one doesn't have one and doesn't need one, so this leads to a dead link.  If someone can fix this properly it'd be good.
HuttyMcphoo 23:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top of page redirect 

message: "Bi-" usually means something that is such-and-such in two ways, as in bilinear and bimodule. But why is it called biproduct in this case? I would like to know this, as I need to invent a Korean translation of this concept in order to write an article in ko:.--Acepectif 20:27, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It derives from the categorial point of view that it is both a product and a coproduct so it is a "product" in two senses (one the categorial dual of the other). -- Leland McInnes 03:00, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I can't understand why I didn't find that it was already mentioned in the article. Anyway thanks! --Acepectif 05:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is it called biproduct? 

message: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/967897/are-there-subtleties-in-the-definition-of-biproduct  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Student298 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing this out. Looking at the edit history for this article, Freeze S wrongly removed part of the definition in 2017, and his edit was never reverted. I have now repaired the definition. It baffles me how this article remained incorrect for almost three years. Joel Brennan (talk) 18:48, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition is wrong/incomplete 

message: The second bullet point at the start of the 'Properties' section is problematic;  p_l \circ f \circ i_k = 0 does not make sense unless we have zero morphisms, or at least a zero object. I have added a clarification tag to the article. Joel Brennan (talk) 18:27, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that I have corrected the definition of a biproduct, the same point also applies to the condition p_l \circ i_k = 0 in the definition. Joel Brennan (talk) 18:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in the 'Properties' section
Talk:Japan Self-Defense Forces

message: The United States Armed Forces page has 6 emblems of the service branches in the infobox while the JSDF page has the national flag. So shouldn't it also show the emblems of the JSDF branches? Or is there a specific reason why the US armed forces page is different? -Artanisen (talk) 06:27, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Add branch emblems to infobox 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Self-Defense Force and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at  until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Toadspike (talk) 22:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Self-Defense Force" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Neurogastroenterology

message: I've expanded a lot on the original stub as part of a course assignment.  I've included what I thought was pertinent to the study of neurogastroenterology.  Expect a lot more changes in the coming days, especially involving the level of detail of the page.  Mcarlson7 (talk) 23:52, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page rehaul
Category talk:Georgia

message: True or false: a good name for this category is... (Please sign with whatever you think the best category title is)
# Country of Georgia
# Georgia (country)
66.245.11.175 14:31, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I finally made sure that the category of Georgia is a category with 2 possible interpretations, and I put them as sub-categories of "Category:Georgia". Please do not put any articles here; always put them at either "Category:Georgia (country)" or "Category:Georgia (U.S. state) 66.32.255.134 22:48, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: I suggest all categories with an adjective meaning "having to do with Georgia" must use "Georgia" for the state and "Georgian" for the country. Any objections?? 66.245.21.56 01:54, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adjective for "having to do with Georgia" to be used in category names 

message: Why am I seeing List of places in Georgia, USA: A-H when it has the proper (US) category on it? Tedernst | talk 19:10, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  bug
Talk:Varg Vikernes

message: Is this individual really important enough to warrant such an in-depth article? Is Wikipedia an encyclopedia or this guy's publicist?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.65.42.219 (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I entirely agree. It's bloated and too detailed.--Quisqualis (talk) 06:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Is the article too long?

message: Should the "Bibliography" section on Varg Vikernes include self-published works, or does that infringe on WP:PROMOTIONAL/WP:SPS? ili (talk) 01:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC about self-published works 

message: * Include all works Does not infringe on WP:SPS, per WP:ABOUTSELF, and WP:PROMO is never a valid reason to omit self-published or self-released material from lists of works. Omitting these entries misleads the reader into believing the subject's output is less than it actually is. Lists of works are exactly the sort of thing that an encyclopedia is expected to be comprehensive about. ili (talk) 01:14, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: All these years he was living a lie. Varg is capable of spitting hot fire all this time. Petercage9 (talk) 05:49, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: ummmm..... source????? 188.30.78.71 (talk) 14:48, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Varg Vikernes the Rapper? 

message: I edited the opening paragraph to mention his ambient and dungeon synth work and it was removed 2A00:23C6:B682:F301:98F4:E058:6A2E:60CF (talk) 02:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  why do my edits keep getting reversed
Talk:Ītzpāpālōtl

message: If Itzpapalotl is "fearsome", why is she associated with paradise?
That is, any expansion of the article should address his conflict.
EmRick 15:56, 15 Jun 2004 (UTun)
Try looking at Aztec dualism. The gods have both good and bad sides. Such as Tlaloc and child sacrifice, but yet he rules of Tlalocan.
Xuchilbara (talk) 02:25, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "fearsome"

message: There's a political blog called Obsidian Wings, possibly founded by a "fearsome warrior goddess" (actually a female professor of philosophy). This count as a contemporary cultural reference?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kick the cat (talk • contribs) 17:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds like a trivial and tangential link, at best. Per WP:TRIVIA I don't think we need to mention any and all examples of people re-using the name or the concept for their own purposes, essentially nothing really to do with the article's subject.--cjllw ʘ TALK 00:39, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The blog, Obsidian Wings 

message: Itzpapalotl means obsidian butterfly in Nahuatl not clawed butterfly. Much of this article is derived from popular culture nonsense. Otontecutli (talk) 22:14, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ugh
Talk:Miniature Fox Terrier

message: AFAIK, Elf, there is only one breed club for the MFT.  Owners of registered dogs in countries other than Australia still belong to the Mini Foxie Club of Australia.  Quill 01:42, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. My bad. Elf | Talk 03:09, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent Edits - Breed Club(s) 

message: Yes, when we lived on the farm, our Jasmine would sneak out next door and chase the neighbour's horse. Bit alarming to see a 400kg horse run away from a 3.5kg dog! As many people have said anecdotally: "They don't realize that they are a very small animal"!
Old_Wombat (talk) 08:26, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "They are confident and will generally interact with dogs and other animals many times their size"
Talk:Ruhr Red Army

message: 'as a result of the Free Corps men who immediately killed everybody who was captured and was armed.'
? Sam [Spade] 16:11, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: verification?

message: This thing was called "Rote Ruhrarmee", not "Ruhr Rote Armee" (which makes absolutely no sense in German). The proper English translation therefore is "Red Ruhr Army" and certainly not "Ruhr Red Army." The opening sentence of the article has been correct in this regard since June 2004 -- fifteen years ago!. It is about time that the lemma is moved accordingly. I tried to do it, but a very alert rules arbiter reverted the move. --Cosal (talk) 21:15, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong title
Talk:Luigi Mario

message: Luigi's full name is Luigi Mario. If you see this changed in error (as people are wont to do), please change it back. -- Kwekubo 21:17, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I objected to having Mario called Mario Mario in Mario since that's simply confusing (and rarely used), but I think it's OK here. However, I believe this article should be located at Luigi (Mario brother) instead. Fredrik (talk) 20:52, 17 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: A lot of things say that Luigi is Mario's younger brother. I am aware of Mario and Luigi being born at the same time at the end of Yoshi's Island, but what official material says that Luigi is Mario's younger brother? The games never directly refered to them as twins... Cheese 17:14, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Twins?

message: I changed an error about this: He's an unlockable character, not an initial fighter.  All I did was trim a bit and nothing else, so if anyone could look over that part and see if it's worded okay I'd appreciate it. - GSGold 20:58, 4 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Super Smash Bros. Melee

message: The Japanese word ruiji (類似) means "resemblance" or "copy".  It made for a name that is effective in both Japanese and English, much as Wario is acceptable in both languages. -- Myria 07:15, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Luigi's name is really Japanese in origin
Talk:TWIRL

message: I changed "widely-used" to "important" because I don't think Blum Blum Shub is widely used. Arvindn 03:48, 18 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Article mentions discrete logarithm as a problem immune to TWIRL. AFAIK this may not be true, as TWIRL can likely be adapted for the function field sieve DLP solving algorithm, which is closely related to GNFS. --NetRolller 3D 17:16, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discrete logarithm
Talk:Cleopatra 2525

message: I moved the episode tables here from their separate pages. They are small enough to warrant this. I'll be attempting to make pages for each episode starting in July. - UtherSRG 16:47, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Episode tables

message: Reviews? Critical reception? Did it suck or what?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.184.77.243 (talk) 23:25, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Depth