Talk:Chief of the Defence Staff (United Kingdom)

message: Which office is the immediate superior of this office? Is it the Ministry of Defence in the person of the Minister itself? Perhaps a table showing the chain of command would be useful in these types of entries, or a link to a central article with such a table.
::It is nominally the Commander-in-Chief, the Queen, but in reality the PM.Straw Cat (talk) 15:11, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What's the Chain of Command?

message: :Image:Jockstirrup.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Jockstirrup.jpg

message: I was under the impression that after being station commander at RAF Halton, Gammage was promoted to Air Commodore. If this is correct, then the mention in the article that he is deputy personal staff officer must be several years old. Does anyone have any further info on this? Kayedj (talk) 21:25, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Richard Gammage 

message: With the recent post retirement promotion of Guthrie, Boyce, Walker and Stirrup to [honorary] five star rank, is this now a given for all retiring CsDS? Should Richards and Houghton expect the nod in a couple of years?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.196.43.45 (talk) 15:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Five Star 

message: Can someone edit the bar section? Don't know how.
Cantab1985 (talk) 10:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: What bar section? If it's a navbox, it'll have to be edited from it's template page. - BilCat (talk) 10:10, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuart Peach 

message: I was thinking that the table should be changed to the standard Officeholder table, thoughts?
|}
Skjoldbro (talk) 10:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree: please go ahead. Dormskirk (talk) 22:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Table 

message: Hi - User:Howard61313 has introduced some american-looking military icons as image placeholders into the article. I personally think they are garish. Views welcome. Dormskirk (talk) 18:44, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: American-looking?? Flags with the Union Jack on them??  - BilCat (talk) 19:14, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I am referring to the image placeholders in the second column on the left which seem to have american-style stars on the epaulets. Dormskirk (talk) 19:17, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, OK. I should shut up until I know what's going on :) - BilCat (talk) 19:26, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: My fault, I was not clear. Dormskirk (talk) 19:51, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I didn't think for one second that these are the so-called "American-looking icons". They have been used in many countries' military-related lists and templates since the first version of this kind of icons created in 2011, and for me, no characteristic of any specific country, including the US, is seemed to be shown on them.--Howard61313 (talk) 06:29, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: While I respect the bold initiative, I do agree with Dormskirk. I have not seen such icons used before, and see no reason for them to be included here as they distract from the content and look rather horrible. Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 08:38, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Icons 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chief of the Defence Staff (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120314120908/http://mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/3631F584-B911-483F-8025-5C34391C7763/0/20101018_central_tlb.pdf to http://mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/3631F584-B911-483F-8025-5C34391C7763/0/20101018_central_tlb.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:25, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chief of the Defence Staff (United Kingdom). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726125253/http://www.gov-news.org/gov/uk/news/mod_announces_new_chief_of_defence_staff/26130.html to http://www.gov-news.org/gov/uk/news/mod_announces_new_chief_of_defence_staff/26130.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/62321/data.pdf
Thanks
Sammartinlai (talk) 13:22, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carter took charge 11 June 2018 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: It seems that the list of chiefs only list the post-nominals that they held during their time as chief. Is this the best way to do it? It seems confusing to me. Also, are we sure that all the post-nominals are correct? For instance, Charles Guthrie is listed as "KT" (Knight of the Thistle) even though he was made a knight of the Thistle after he retired.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ff462 (talk • contribs) 08:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi - It is standard that we give details of the post holder with the title, rank and postnominals that they had at the time they held office. Please compare with other similar articles. I don't see KT behind Guthrie's name in this article. You probably meant Cameron and I have now removed the KT after his name. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 09:37, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post-nominals 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:56, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion