Talk:Christians for Biblical Equality

message: :Image:CBE Logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:CBE Logo.gif

message: I've removed the link to cbmw.org from the external links and it was placed back since it's an opposing view. Opposing views are already linked in "See also." The link section is for links concerning what the article is about, not advertising for other groups. Basileias (talk) 03:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Links

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Christians for Biblical Equality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110614124421/http://www.cbeinternational.org/?q=content%2Four-mission-and-history to http://www.cbeinternational.org/?q=content%2Four-mission-and-history
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://cbmw.org/uncategorized/personal-reflections-on-the-history-of-cbmw-and-the-state-of-the-gender-debate/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:29, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Christians for Biblical Equality. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110112103529/http://www.christianethicstoday.com/cetart/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.main&ArtID=505 to http://christianethicstoday.com/cetart/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.main&ArtID=505
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: By my count, 12 of the 17 footnotes cite primary sources. Nine of those 12 cite the CBE's own website. Other parts of the article have no sources. This seems like a problem. Amandil21 (talk) 22:55, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: sources

message: I've removed the following unsourced sentence from the lede:
"They also believe that headship in marriages are for the older spouse and not for husbands alone."
There is nothing in CBE or other egalitarian doctrinal understanding that associates marital "headship" with whoever is older.  Rather, egalitarian interpretation contends that the use of the Greek term for "head" (kephale) does not connote or imply leadership or authority over (as "head" does in English and "rosh" in Hebrew), but is rather (in the metaphorical uses in question) about unity (head-body metaphor) and source (as in the term "headwaters").
Also, acknowledging that the article needs better sourcing, but as said sentence demonstrates, there's often a lot of misinformation floating around for positions of interpretational-issue-focused groups like this outside of their own sites and materials, so it can be hard to find usable, accurate secondary sources... John Darrow (talk) 06:27, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect claim regarding understanding of "headship" in marriage