lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2001 Italian Grand Prix

message: This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it does not satisfy the G12 criteria, specifically the "there is no free-content material on the page worth saving and no later edits requiring attribution" part. I would also add that the part of the article being identified as a copyright violation is a table of results of a sporting event - by its very nature, it's difficult to make such a table look very different from the source material while maintaining factual accuracy. DH85868993 (talk) 20:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because.... it falls under the fair use classification, allowing the use of copyrighted material for educational and informative purposes. The material is not being used for commercial purposes. It is not a "highly original" work; it is, rather, statistical grand prix data in tabular format. This tabular data represents a meager 5% of the article text; 95% of the article is original content contributed by Wikipedians. Finally, its use does nothing to diminish the value of the copyright-holder's content; if anything, it only serves to better inform people about the sport of Formula One, and motor racing in general, adding to the fan base.  --BillCook (talk) 21:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion
Talk:2001 United States Grand Prix

message: "This was the first sport/race event held in USA after the September 11, 2001 attacks."
This can't be true.  There was a NASCAR race two weeks after 9/11, baseball started a week after 9/11.  I'm sure football was back up and running soon after.
I seem to remember "the first international sport/race event" at one point.  Was it removed?  Why? EatFood24 (talk) 00:14, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Definitely not the first sport/race event in the USA after 9/11. I've restored the word "international" and requested a citation even for that. DH85868993 (talk) 03:08, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The first?
Category talk:Sathya Sai Baba

message: Regardless of SSB's stated intentions of not wanting to create a new cult and his teaching of the unity of all religions, it cannot be reasonably denied that he is the figurehead of a new religious movement and the figurehead of the Sathya Sai Organisation. Note that I do not mention him as a founder or leader because he may not be the de facto founder and leader. We cannot know what is going on inside the Sathya Sai Trust and the Sathya Sai Organisation. I heard that the lost all power to the members of the Sathya Sai Trust in the 1990s. Andries 16:35, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Adaptive resonance theory

message: Why is there colored text in this article? This is the first time I've seen such text in a Wikipedia article. Is it even in line with formatting guidelines? I personally would vote for removing it and making all text black.--Zamomin (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colored text
Talk:Freddie (dance)

message: This page is produced by an improper "cut'n'paste" action of user:Mcy jerry.
The previous edit history of the page is in the Freddy (weather) page before the as of 19:57, 11 August 2005. mikka (t) 16:38, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit history
Talk:Ottumwa High School

message: I found a very quirky piece on how the fight song is probably the best fight song in Iowa. http://www.cityofottumwa.com/general-information/about/ 
Here are the fight song lyrics in case someone wants to integrate them into the article. It's from the same cite as above:
"Ottumwa High will always be our school 
And we’ll ever love her true. 
We’ll sing for her, we’ll yell for her 
And my, what we won’t do! 
We’ll put her on the map,
And see that she stands pat, 
For we love her true we do. 
Northside, southside, and all around the town 
We’ll all join in together to root for OHS 
In football, basketball, and every kind of sport, 
We’ll cheer her on to victory 
For Dear Old OHS, Rah! Rah! Rah! For Ottumwa! 
LaVevo! LaVivo! LaVevo! Vivo Vum! 
Johnny Get a Rat Trap, Bigger than a cat trap, 
Johnny Get a Rat Trap, Bigger than a cat trap, 
LaVevo! LaVivo! SST! Boom! Bah! 
OTTUMWA HIGH SCHOOL! Rah! Rah! Rah! 
Northside, southside, and all around the town 
We’ll all join in together to root for OHS 
In football, basketball, and every kind of sport, 
We’ll cheer her on to victory 
For Dear Old OHS, Rah! Rah! Rah! For Ottumwa!"
RedDarling (talk) 08:11, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fight Song
Talk:Mosėdis

message: Description of the picture says that it is a church in Molėtai, wchich is in a different part of the country.Dirgela 16:45, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the description of the picture was wrong. Thanks for correcting it. --Lysy (talk) 22:36, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Gerson therapy

message: I have rewritten the article a bit for NPOV.  Previously, it started with 'The pseudoscientific Gerson therapy.' Writing like this won't convince anyone.  The criticisms speak for themselves if they are allowed to do so.
Also, there need to be sources for this article. Merkinsmum  19:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV and Sources

message: I have moved a bit about developments made by later practitioners, to the section named 'developments,' and added somewhere references to decent sources can go if and when they are found. Merkinsmum 00:41, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: references/sections

message: I've added a tag requesting that the article be checked for neutrality. Anchoress 21:13, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality check

message: the bolded section of following is original research
:The Guardian has reported that the main clinic of the Gerson Institute in Mexico charges $4900 per week for the therapy, a possible indication that this therapy is a purely profit-driven industry.
the article cited does not speculate whether this fee indicates any profit motive behind the therapy, so i'm assuming this is the editor's view--Mongreilf (talk) 19:41, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  or/speculation removed

message: ===Discussion===
I don't see any reason why the two shouldn't be merged, but I'm interested in a discussion, if any. Anchoress · Weigh Anchor · Catacomb 21:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[Gerson diet]] 

message: I don't see any reason why the two shouldn't be merged, but I'm interested in a discussion, if any. Anchoress · Weigh Anchor · Catacomb 21:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Merge - Gerson diet seems to be a POV fork. Considering that there's not really any sourced info in the article and dubious statements (see discussion above), I suggest merging the 'reading' section and deleting the rest. Anchoress · Weigh Anchor · Catacomb 21:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pro merge

message: I went ahead and merged. The other talk page is still over there; I guess we just leave it? ImpIn | (t - c) 07:44, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge finished
Talk:Kabaka Yekka

message: By renaming this article to "The King Alone", you (Aliceinlampyland) are rewriting history. The party has never been known as such - not even in English publications. Rules on WP:NC say: Name your pages in English and place the native transliteration on the first line of the article unless the native form is more commonly used in English than the English form. --Ezeu 17:09, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Kabaka Yekka
Talk:Thelston Payne

message: This article was the subject of a November, 2005 AfD with the result of a strong consensus Keep, after a rewrite. Xoloz 17:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD result
Talk:Full inverted index

message: Maybe this information should be moved to inverted index? I started on that before seeing this article. Inverted index is a more general term, covering both full inverted index and inverted file index. The article on Inverted index could be expanded to contain all of this information, and maybe also some examples with both of the subtypes. -- Nils Grimsmo 17:54, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This has now been done. -- Nils Grimsmo 20:24, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:General Motors W platform

message: The 97- 05 Century is missing...  And I believe the 97-04 Regal an 97-05 Century had 109" WB.
[www.edmunds.com/used/1998/buick/regal/17132/specs.html?tid=edmunds.u.options.leftsidenav..6.Buick*]
The engines list lacks the 2.5L used in early Luminas. Also the transmissions list is incomplete, this article is weighted heavily towards the first generation cars. mihela24.111.170.156 14:23, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:1911 Encyclopedia topics/14

message: The biographies are done. I've been thinking we should re-sort the leftover geo-political entries by nation, as a start for the next project, that is, getting all the named places of France, Germany, Italy, Spain (etc) into sorted list. 
In my researches, I've found redlinked towns in lists of other-language wikis. This would be an inter-wiki project. --FourthAve 17:59, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Rhys Fulber

message: There was a broken link to the network producer page, which is now fixed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.101.105.254 (talk) 11:26, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed broken link 

message: What would the purpose be for a merge into this article?  (Just curious...) --Martin Osterman 18:13, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Expansion is always good.  Unfortunately, my expertise with the subject is very limited and I'm tied up with several other articles right now.  Guess it's yours for the taking. :) --Vortex 06:17, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging [[Conjure One]] Into This Article? 

message: Thank you Unint for fixing up everything - you made it look much cleaner! Greg Birdsall 14:04, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean Up 

message: I just added a discography. Since Fulber has quite a number of recording and production credits the two sections Discography and Production credits should get a Discography page of its own. IndustrialGiant (talk) 20:13, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography
Talk:Mail order

message: Mail order is the buying of goods or services by mail delivery. The buyer places an order for the desired products with the merchant through some remote methods such as:
* Sending an order form in the mail 
* Placing a telephone call
* Placing an order with a few travelling agents and paying by installments 
* Filling in a form on a website or mobile app — if the product information is also mainly obtained online rather than via a paper catalogue or via television, this model is online shopping or e-commerce
Then, the products are delivered to the customer. The products are usually delivered directly to an address supplied by the customer, such as a home address, but occasionally the orders are delivered to a nearby retail location for the customer to pick up. Some merchants also allow the goods to be shipped directly to a third party consumer, which is an effective way to send a gift to an out-of-town recipient. Some merchants delivered the goods directly to the customer via their travelling agents.
A mail order catalogue is a publication containing a list of general merchandise from a company. Companies who publish and operate mail order catalogues are referred to as cataloguers within the industry. Cataloguers buy or manufacture goods then market those goods to prospects (prospective customers). Cataloguers may "rent" names from list brokers or cooperative databases. The catalogue itself is published in a similar fashion as any magazine publication and distributed through a variety of means, usually via a postal service and the internet.
Sometimes supermarket products do mail order promotions, whereby people can send in the UPC plus shipping and handling to get a product made especially for the company. 103.252.171.18 (talk) 05:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mail Order House
Talk:Dust (relativity)

message: Can the creators/editors of this article please clarify?
The stub mentions general relativity, but there are already articles on 
*dust solutions in gtr
*intergalactic dust clouds
*interstellar dust clouds 
If the intent is to clarify how the word "dust" is used in classical gravitation with how that word is used in "astronomy", I think this can be clarified in the existing articles.  
Depending on the answer to my query, I guess that it would be appropriate to merge this article with the existing articles and the remove this item from the disambiguation page.
*Just reading over the articles, I can see how it might be merged with dust solution, but I really don't feel comfortable offering much advice here on general relativity.  We should probably ask the folks at WikiProject Physics.--Pharos 16:03, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Why is this article needed?
Talk:Rule of Two

message: *I oppose the merge.  This article is so big, it deserves to be on its own.
*Seconded.
*I concur; its large enough that it deserves its own entry.
*Yes, there should be no merge. The article should stay an individual article. However, it does need to be expanded. --OldRightist 23:56, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Then I shall remove the notice, since it seems consensus is not to merge. --maru  (talk) contribs 06:26, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This topic absolutely does not merit its own article. You are talking about a pedagogical principle in a fictional universe, the only real claim for notability resting on a single spoken line by Yoda in a movie. This article should be merged with Sith.  I really wonder how you think there is a "consensus" against merging when all you have is a handful of unsigned comments against merging.  There has been no discussion or debate here and I think the arguments are far stronger in favor of merging than against.67.159.78.196 (talk) 18:39, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: It would be nice to have citations in this and other Sith-related articles.  From the point of view of somebpdy who's not read any Star Wars books, I have no idea where this came from.  Just a suggestion, but it would be nice to see.  --KertDawg 15:00, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Better? --maru  (talk) contribs 06:24, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Yes, thank you! --KertDawg 21:09, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: Darth Revan and Darth Malak have not been during the Rule of Two. They have been in the time of the old republic! At this time there was no Rule of Two! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.63.118.91 (talk) 00:15, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revan? Malak?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/The Left and Opposition to War

message: If the consensus of this AfD is to keep the article, does it need to be listed on Requested moves, in view of the preference many voters seem to have for the title "The Left and war"? Aecis praatpaal 18:31, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: if you raise the move on the talk page I expect there will be no diagreement and then we can just go and move it with out going through Resquested moves, cutting down on burocrasy.--JK the unwise 13:46, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Requests for bureaucratship/Jtkiefer

message: Jtkiefer, I think you did not understand my answer. First I did not vote neutral for Kelly because of Time, Kelly is a veteran here who knows the policies better than most. My considerations were that she won't have the time to be an arbitrator, an ardministrator and a bureaucrat at the same time, and also that I have a problem giving all the powers to an arbitrator. The reason I brought Kelly, is because the issue of comparing users to vote was brought. The reason to vote against you is not only because you were not here long enough, but also other considerations. You were not here long enough as a member, you did not socialize really with members beyond reverting vandalism and stuff unrelated with the content of articles. You did not really engage in heated debates and participated in other projects than vandalism units etc. A bureaucrat is not only someone that has two more powers. What should you to do with a close RfA, when the critics against members should be examined by you, because you're at a point of considering neutral positions? I personaly vote oppose for a RfA, when a member did not participate in a heated discussion, or articles that are controversial, because only there could I know how really a member will behave in such circonstances. Fadix 18:36, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Then you will unfortunately be voting oppose for a long long time since even though I don't avoid them and have no problem trying to help parties solve their issues if needed I normally don't throw myself headfirst into flame wars. Jtkiefer T | @ | C  ----- 19:11, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I am not necessarly talking about flame wars, most articles I have viewed, and I have viewed many(in the hundreds), there was at least once, a heated debate(even those that are featured). If you pay attention to my RfA votes, those that I have supported have more than once engaged in such debates. When I want to judge someones judgement and ability to stay cool, I love reading those exchanges in talk pages. If you do not engage in such debates, you won't be able to aquire the experience I believe is important. Helping others is also crucial, but it is kind of difficult to help people that have more experience than you, because only by the fact that they are requiring help in such heated debates indicate that they have at least once engaged in such debates themselves and thosefor more experienced than you there. If I have a problem, it is not you who I will consult(don't take this as an offense), but administrators like dab who have a long experience and generally know how to deal with different situations and because I've seen them in action. This is how an administrator becomes respected and trusted and worthy to become one of those rare bureaucrats. Fadix 19:39, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Well I have a (hopefully) neat list of archives for my talk page so many of the debates I've been in are listed there.  Not that it really matters though, yet again the people with timecountitis have won. Jtkiefer T | @ | C  ----- 21:32, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Cooperative education

message: While the notation in this section is thorough, if it was intergrated with some wikilinking, it would be even better for those who wanted to find information quickly about a source in particular. The <ref> system could easily augment the notation already here.--Esprit15d 13:08, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes 

message: Is it possible to include the following:
Thanks
LOBOSKYJOJO (talk) 02:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Cooperative Education
Talk:Road course ringer

message: Did Ron Fellows take a pole as well? --MartinUK 00:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

message: The list is a bit of a mess. Some drivers don’t even list qualifications that they should be listed and others are questionable road course ringers KD0710 (talk) 12:45, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up of drivers
Talk:Mehmed Emin Âli Pasha

message: == Name of the pasha and article ==
I don't agree with the naming of the article. Mehmet is a Turkish name (It is equivalent of Muhammad in Arabic) Since it is Turkish, it should be pronounced and written according to Turkish grammer rules. So the last letter d should be t. On the other hand Âli is a name in which ^ is used to designate a slight lengthening. It is never written as Aa.The name of the article should be Mehmet Emin Âli Pasha. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 16:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - especially on the Aali part. I have never seen this spelling, and it is neither common sense nor use. Either "Ali" or "Âli" should be used in the title. Ithinkicahn (talk) 08:37, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: I don't agree with the naming of the article. Mehmet is a Turkish name (It is equivalent of Muhammad in Arabic) Since it is Turkish, it should be pronounced and written according to Turkish grammer rules. So the last letter d should be t. On the other hand Âli is a name in which ^ is used to designate a slight lengthening. It is never written as Aa.The name of the article should be Mehmet Emin Âli Pasha. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 16:45, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed - especially on the Aali part. I have never seen this spelling, and it is neither common sense nor use. Either "Ali" or "Âli" should be used in the title. Ithinkicahn (talk) 08:37, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the pasha and article
Category talk:German nobility

message: Can somebody create an article on German nobility? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 19:10, 12 November 2005 (UTC)

message: I've been trying to put some consistency to some of these category pages.  This page lists a number of articles entitled "House of ..."  Some are alphabetized under "H" for House, and some are under the name of that particular House.  I'd like to sort them so that they are all done one way or the other.
In the category "European Royal Families," where the majority of the articles are "House of ...", I felt it made sense to sort them by the name of each particular House.  But I'm inclined to think that here, it makes sense to do them all under H for House.
Opinions?    140.147.236.194 (talk) 13:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alphabetizing "House of ..."? 

message: As most will be aware, the nobility and titles were abolished by the German constitution many years ago. This should be an empty category (or it should be renamed - e.g. ex-nobility in Germany). The tabloids and glossy magazines love them but they have no rights under German law.--TraceyR (talk) 21:33, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unconstitutional
Talk:Oskar Körner

message: The Beer Hall Putsch article does list Oskar Körner as a Nazi supporter who died in the putsch, but the Mein Kampf article says that "It has been dedicated to Dietrich Eckart" and that Körner and others were mentioned in a forward, so is it correct to say that the book was dedicated to him? Also, I think the statement about occult practices could use some support. Sources need to be cited. --DavidConrad 19:53, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of condottieri

message: The name of the last Condottiero in the list of Machiavelli
in the beginning of the article is Antonio,not Antonia.
"antonia" is a female name.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.132.80.220 (talk) 17:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled