Talk:Bandung Conference

message: Actually, Roeslan Abdulgani was not then Foreign Minister of Indonesia, but Secretary General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The Foreign Minister was then Soenario. RahadyanS 18:42, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Reference to the above fact is in, among other places, Asia-Africa Speaks From Bandung, a bound transcript of speeches from the conference published in 1955 by the Indonesian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.  RahadyanS 14:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Abdulgani's proper title in 1955

message: The link listing Cyprus as an attending government does not seem to show that Cyprus was present officially. The map indicates that the Gold Coast (now Ghana) was present.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.167.194.226 (talk) 21:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Ghana (Gold Coast) not Cyprus

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Bandung Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120513090833/http://www.dailynews.lk/2005/04/21/fea01.htm to http://www.dailynews.lk/2005/04/21/fea01.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.namegypt.org/Relevant%20Documents/00Asian_African_Conference%5B1%5D.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:41, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article currently misrepresent item "G" as being the whole of the final declaration items "A" to "G". Details from the Bandung Conference can be found at the University of Luxembourg, https://www.cvce.eu/en/search?q=Bandung The following should not be said to the public without first explaining the political mechanics that Sukarno was working with, but to get it off my chest in summary personally I read the final communiqué as saying something like:
A) Money and Atomic energy are good and the UN and World Bank should provide additional funds for our group; B) Our countries were the cradles of culture and religion until Europeans came a few centuries ago, the spread of our culture should not be impeded just because others are of different race; C) Human rights are good and we oppose racial discrimination; D) Colonialism should be quickly ended; our friends Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia should be UN voting members; E) Palestine and Yemen should be supported, and Indonesia has just cause to colonise and loot West Irian for its enlightenment; F) Fear the bomb and admit more non nuclear members; and G) Ten points of lights for newspapers to publish. Unfortunately it takes thirty to sixty pages to explain the background; Sukarno may be totally immoral and Bandung itself may have been a total failure for what he was hoping but he soon proved that he was in deed running rings around the US and Soviet chimps. Only thing that ever stopped him was running afoul of Suharto and his new friends, a sociopaths tripping over another sociopath, funny except for the millions of victims and the Orwellian manipulation of school texts and media outlets.Daeron (talk) 02:45, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Also where does it say “overseas Chinese owed primary loyalty to their home nation, rather than to China” in the communiqué? I can only find “Zhou  Enlai announced at  the Bandung Conference in 1955 that  the Chinese government would offer a nationality agreement similar to that of Indonesia to any country with which China had diplomatic relations” – Kaihsu (talk) 10:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Declaration 

message: The second paragraph needs to be edited for clarity: The conference's stated aims were to promote Afro-Asian economic and cultural cooperation and to oppose colonialism or neocolonialism by any nation. The conference was a step towards the eventual creation of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) yet the two initiatives ran in parallel during the 1960s, even coming in confrontation with one another prior to the 2nd Cairo NAM Conference in 1964.[3] Tracymacl (talk) 05:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Necessary Edit for Clarity