Talk:1750

message: 19-January-2007 (revised 16Feb07): Prior to November 2006, many years didn't have event images.  For the 420 yearly articles in "1500-1799" and "1880-1999", I have been able to add images beside the corresponding text under Events, but that required opening space, along the righthand-side, by moving the "Year-in-other-calendars" to the Births section (which is where it "appeared" to be in most years with few events, by automatic formatting).  The new images now are near the corresponding Events text.  I also had to separate some sections by adding a break-line template:
::: 
            
The break-line pushes the next subheader down, below any future Events images above it.  Images have been added in a similar manner to the 1500s, 1600s, 1700s-1890s, 1900s-1980s, etc. Among those 480+ years, the various articles, originally, each had slightly different month-name groups and formats; some articles had only one large image, placed wherever it would fit.  -Wikid77 06:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: 16-Feb-2007 (revised 17Mar07): Many of the yearly articles from 1582-1800 have had the wrong weekday starting for the Julian calendar, which started as a "10-day slower" calendar, then lost a day each century, while other nations hadn't converted to the Gregorian calendar (such as Russia until 1919):
:: - in the 1600s, use "10-day slower" - in the 1700s, use "11-day"
:: - in the 1800s, use "12-day slower" - in the 1900s, use "13-day"
When a Julian year is 10-days slower, the weekday is 4 days behind (14 - 10), or 3 days ahead (7-4 = 3), of the Gregorian weekday, until a Julian leapday in 1700, 1800, or 1900 shifts an extra weekday.  The Gregorian 1582 ended on Friday, while the Julian 1582 ended on Monday (3 weekdays ahead).
It is helpful to maintain day-shift rulers (Gregorian-to-Julian):
: 10-day: Monday-Thu, Tue-Fri, Wed-Sat, Thu-Sun, Fri-Mon, Sat-Tue, Sun-Wed.
: 10-day: (3-weekday ahead)
: 11-day: Monday-Fri, Tue-Sat, Wed-Sun, Thu-Mon, Fri-Tue, Sat-Wed, Sun-Thu.
: 11-day: (4-weekday ahead)
: 12-day: Monday-Sat, Tue-Sun, Wed-Mon, Thu-Tue, Fri-Wed, Sat-Thu, Sun-Fri.
: 12-day: (5-weekday ahead)
Because Russia avoided converting until 1919, the Julian calendar is notable well into the 20th century.  -Wikid77 00:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julian slower 

message: 16-Feb-2007: The Wikipedia concept was warned, years ago, of the natural tendency toward rampant vandalism and hacking of articles, which advised that article-content should be controlled in some manner to avoid trashing thousands of hours of work.  Indeed, within weeks of reformatting over 300 yearly articles (according to the repeated steps listed in "Talk:1550#Format"), various other users began hacking sporadic articles into ad hoc formats, returning to the days where each year has a slightly different format from other years.
In general, as is the case in user-defined webpage-content, articles should evolve into semi-controlled sections, where only some parts of a page could be changed by random users, and protected sections would enforce standard formats and ensure that critical information is not vandalized or hacked.  For example, for all years in one century, a standard format could be locked into all articles, but users might opt to expand information freely in related articles tied to "see-also" links.
Be not deceived, the problem is critical: in the "Hurricane Katrina" article, watched by dozens of people, the Mississippi landfall time (carefully recorded from footnote sources) got botched by several hours during a flurry of edits, and the mistake lasted for over 11 days, even though hundreds of people had edited the article.  A controlled section for a hurricane article could lock-down the eye-path, wind-speed, and landfall details against tampering, while allowing a flurry of edits in other sections not critical to understanding the basic facts of Who, what, when, where, why, and how for an article.  There are too many other subjects needing expanded articles, to expect editors to continually monitor older articles for sporadically botched key facts.  -Wikid77 06:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hacked format 

message: The "1750 in topic" thing on the right has been attacked by vandals!  Can someone fix it, please? --Angeldeb82 (talk) 05:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Vandalized

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1750. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091015033238/http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/teach/newby/teaching09/LectureII.pdf to http://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/teach/newby/teaching09/LectureII.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:19, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified