Talk:Zea (plant)

message: I am going to grow teosinte in the greenhouse and currently I'm trying to persuade the seeds to germinate. In the wikipedia article about teosinte I read that seeds easily germinate if treated with diluted hydrogen peroxide. I would be very grateful if anyone could point me to the source of this information, since it would be very helpful to know the concentration of hydrogen peroxide and duration  of the treatment.
I've tried soaking teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) seeds in 20% hydrogen peroxide overnight and have had pretty good success in getting the plants to germinate in the greenhouse.  I found this protocol in the following forum discussion at CIMMYT:
http://www.cimmyt.org/abc/geneflow/geneflow_pdf_engl/Geneflow_Group2.pdf  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbhufford (talk • contribs) 19:23, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article talk page was automatically added with  banner as it falls under :Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 21:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:FOOD|WikiProject Food and drink]] Tagging

message: See the title   Avram Primack (talk) 23:09, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  This page needs an image of the actual grains. The plant is not enough to understand its difference from ears of corn. 

message: Is this article about the full genus? Zea (genus) currently redirects here. However teosintes are a paraphyletic group, because Zea mays spp. mays is not a teosinte. Esmito (talk) 13:51, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paraphyletic group or full genus? 

message: I notice that in a May 2010 edit, "as may a cycad" was changed to "and may be a cycad".
Actually, I think the former was more plausible.  For the varieties of Tripsacum they're referring to to be cycads is implausible because cycads are not closely related to the grasses, including Tripsacum.  That's what "and may be a cycad" would mean.  But for two species, not closely related, to share the same common name is quite plausible (and is the topic of the rest of the sentence), and I think that's what they meant by "as may a cycad:" That some species of cycad is called "teosinte" locally, even though it's not related.
If I don't hear an objection in a few days I'll change it back (or, preferably, to something a little clearer). -- Why Not A Duck 20:55, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[tripsacum]] and [[cycad]] 

message: This makes little sense to me.  The article is not specific to maize and it isn't a general description of evolution, even if you restricted the link to that word.
CarlFink (talk) 16:56, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does "Maize Evolution" link to "Artificial Selection" 

message: I'm just a casual reader, but so far as I'm concerned this article is completely missing information about the most interesting characteristics of this plant.  I want answers to questions like: Where are the ears on a teosinte plant?  How big are the ears? Where are the tassels relative to ears? How many stems arise from the root crown? How big is the plant?  
Given the HUGE apparent differences in form between teosinte and modern cultivated maize, it would be very interesting to see an 'evolution of man' type progression of forms with estimated dates attached.  What did 'corn' look like at first European contact vs. today.  Perhaps these questions could be best answered in the maize entry, but the info is missing there as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.67.251.101 (talk) 21:44, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need better images and description of teosinte 

message: The section 'Origin of maize and interaction with teosintes' should be brought up to date and should not use outdated sources (pre 2000).  Disproven theories should only be mentioned at the end of the section, and clearly note they have been eliminated as possibilities.. Genetic analysis has shown that maize is a variety of teosinte.  --Aflafla1 (talk) 02:17, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section needs updating.