Talk:Creativity techniques

message: This section looks very poor to me. It's tone is not neutral, descriptive and it seems to contain a lot of mumbo jumbo. Masahiko 10:40, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Who are Osborn and Miles? Certainly not disambiguation pages. TimBentley (talk) 04:25, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Surname links are usually bad

message: After going through all the links, I was tempted to remove them all.  I left a half dozen, but am not really pleased with them either.  Let's try to hold to WP:EL and WP:SPAM, please. --Ronz 15:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External link cleanup

message: I'm working on the creativity page, and I'll be doing my best to make this page more useful for that page (it's long) by moving material here. If anyone has stuff to offer, it would be great. At the moment the biggest issue seems to be that this page is not sourced, and has various musings rather more than material based in the literature.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 07:01, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  If anyone's watching 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Creativity techniques. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080706010359/http://www.cognos.com/newsletter/decisions/st_070307_01.html to http://www.cognos.com/newsletter/decisions/st_070307_01.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:54, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I propose that Group creativity techniques, created by User:Silver Master today, be merged into Creativity techniques. Many of the techniques listed or described in Creativity techniques are already techniques that are used by groups, so it seems unwarranted to have separate articles for "individual" and "group" creativity techniques. Biogeographist (talk) 18:30, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can understand enough of Group creativity techniques to merge it into this article, I would suggest that you be WP:Bold and go ahead and do it. If there's not enough there to merge, it can simply be redirected here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:59, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  I will do it 30 days after the merge proposal, per WP:Merging. Biogeographist (talk) 11:34, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Suit yourself, but that it what WP:BOLD is for. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  On second thought, I agree that enough time has already passed to merge now. Biogeographist (talk) 17:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal, March 2017 

message: The Web 2.0 section seems very out-of-place in this article as it doesn't describe a technique, but describes collaborative aspects of Web 2.0 in vague terms without citation. Hadley12656 (talk) 21:05, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. The single source it had was a wikispace that's now gone. I boldly deleted the whole section. OsFish (talk) 02:17, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal proposal, September 2018