Talk:Human rights in Germany

message: As of July 1st 2011 there is no mandatory military or alternative service for male citizens of Germany anymore. 
KreeBlumeKreeBlume (talk) 14:25, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Military Service

message: The Link Evaluation of Human Rights and Constitutional Rights in Germany was removed a short time ago. So I'm sorry to suggest, this agenda of Wikipedias is not really to be found by people who'd like to participate but 
people that are either bored or notorious. 
Too bad it's about Human Rights.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.56.132.149 (talk) 20:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The linked page does not even remotely fit the requirements of Wikipedia:External_links. For starters, it does not contain any information whatsoever on the lemma, and it is not in English. --Mellum (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Value of Human Rights and Constitutional Rights in Germany

message: From TFA:
:"Under a new law, the courts may order that a person be detained indefinitely if convicted of particularly serious crimes and has completed his sentence but is judged, after expert testimony, to be a danger to the public."
I'm not sure about the "new" part here. The German Wikipedia entry does not really say anything about it, but AFAIK (which isn't very far, admittedly), it's not a new law. Someone with more knowledge of these things should look into this. -- Schnee (cheeks clone) 02:34, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, there is something new about this: Previously, this could only be decided on in the original trial of the actual crime. Now, in very specific cases, it can still be imposed later on i.e. when rehabilitation during the prison term has been found to have failed with very dangerous individuals. This was not the least due to pressure after some violently pedophile convicts had been released only to immediately prey upon and kill more kids. Authorities back then had no choice but to release the convict when he had served his time, even when they knew fully well that he was dangerous. Now, the alternative of retroactive decision on Sicherungsverwahrung allows them to keep the convict behind bars. This provision was added in 2004.  --OliverH 10:59, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sicherungsverwahrung 

message: The article was in a horrible state, with irrelevant information on the political structure, weird biased factlets, and downright wrong information (Mein Kampf is not illegal to sell). I've basically rewritten it. The following omissions might be debatable:
* I don't see how racist attacks or trafficking in human beings is a human rights issue (unless the government fails to combat it), while other crimes aren't.
* I have removed allegations without reference (such as "discrimination against minority religious groups" or the discrimination by the three-tier education system; they are worse than useless IMHO.
* The section on police brutality and treatment of refugees are too short. I just didn't get around to it...
* I removed many irrelevant links.
Still, I think it is an improvement :-) I have removed the cleanup boxes for now. --Mellum 16:07, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: I deleted the section "Forced Germanisation, minority discrimination and child-kidnapping" for being POV. All sources are linked to the CEED / jugendamt-wesel.com, which is private, of rather questinable quality, and in this context very much POV-oriented. While trying to find actual court rulings regarding the mentioned case, I came up with , which paints a much different picture (the parent having been court-ordered to speak German during accompanied meetings with the child, because there is no Polish-speaking county official available to control what is being said).
I don't argue that such cases of human right violation don't exist, but unless they can be verified by a more neutral source than website content (partially) created by an involved party, I don't think they belong here. Especially not with the thinly-veiled insult of the Jugendamt having been "established during Nazi rule". -- DevSolar (talk) 13:43, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Followup. I dug deeper into the subject and found . I admit there has been some wrong being done - on both sides, mind you - but the article section was still very much POV, and I still don't think this case warrants a seperate mention. -- DevSolar (talk) 16:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Followfollowup. With your strong language skills and quest for less POV in Wikipedia I strongly advise you to translate this this Wikipedia article / paragraph for our English - speaking friends. I'm just too tired to do so since years of German Wikipedia's POV - brainwash washed away my brains...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.192.60.137 (talk) 12:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Advise all you want, but I don't think that criticism of the institution warrants an entry on the page "Human rights in Germany". If you think otherwise, you do the translating. -- 145.228.61.5 (talk) 15:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Jugendamt Wesel case 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Human rights in Germany. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040307062424/http://www.coe.int/T/E/Com/Files/Themes/trafficking/ to http://www.coe.int/T/E/Com/Files/Themes/trafficking/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060710215106/http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-deu/index to http://web.amnesty.org/library/eng-deu/index
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:09, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I think joint adoption has been legislated.   --Carlos-X (talk) 22:46, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  joint adoption 

message: RESPECTED MADAM/SIR...MY NAME YADAVINDERA SANDHU D.O.B.22 MAY 1976...AT FRANKFURT AM MAIN...BUT SOME FAMILY PROBLEM THEY TOOK ME TO INDIA....PLEASE TELL ME IS THERE ANY LAW TO I GO BACK TO GERMAN...PLEASE TELL ME...THANKS 103.223.9.185 (talk) 06:11, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GERMAN BORN BOY STORY