Talk:Dialga

message: Great photoshopping job on this coro-coro scan. However, one issue with it is that the spike-ish thing protruding from behind Diaruga's head isn't supposed to be there; it is actually a part of Parukia that's standing behind the Pokemon, so I suggest someone fix that detail. Thanks. Erik the Appreciator 03:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: What type is dialga?--User:Rat235478683-- 23:47, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Typing

message: Diaruga does not appear in the 9th movie. Please update anything regarding this if you use Wiki as a potential source. XenoL-Type 03:36, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: OK, Nintendo hasn't confirmed the official romanization of Diaruga yet, so until further notice this should be at Diaruga. It has no place here at Dialga. Double Dash 20:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was wondering the same thing. Diagla doesn't even sound right! -24.92.41.95 12:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know I'd have read it on SPP or PPN. They've never mentioned 'Dialga'. I'll request moves for both this and Palkia. Double Dash 21:04, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: SPP never mentions new romanizations. These romanizations were posted on www.Filb.de which is a very reliable site that has never posted unconfirmed stuff. It is very possible that the trademarks "Dialga" and "Palkia" were found on some Pokemon merchandise. Just because you don't like the romanizations doesn't make them fake. --Lividore 03:11, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was no move. -- tariqabjotu 23:59, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dialga? What? 

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Support - Yeah, we need confirmation before we can officialy name the article "Dialga." Besides, Dairuga sounds way cooler!
*Oppose - These romanizations were confirmed by Filb.de, about the only site that has never posted unconfirmed news, and I've said it about eight times now. This move request is ridiculous; if you don't like the romanizations you'll have to swallow that bitter pill and move on because they're confirmed. Lividore 03:20, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I've been trying to contribute by adding a few players' perspectives of Dialga into the article. These minor contributions keep getting deleted, probably indiscriminately. It would be much better to take into account the players and their reception of the pokemon. --170.211.117.7 13:02, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry, how can you prove people "like" Dialga more, or "more experienced" players prefer Palkia?—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 13:26, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps it needed clean-up, but I referred to a small group. You know you'll be able to argue until you win if I'm referring to the fans as a whole. In fact, I'm referring to a small collective subgroup in the numerous amount of Pokemon fans. The truth is, I didn't refer to the fan mass as a whole, and the facts are most possibly valid. There are experienced players who prefer all kinds of pokemon. Some prefer Blissey over Wigglytuff, and vice versa. This is a debate when "defenseless sponges" are mentioned. --170.211.117.7 13:44, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You can't just say an opinion. What you're adding is called weasel words. If you can give an actual, reliable source then you can add your opinions.—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 13:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

text: As if said information can't be added after a source is provided and we can call an opinion true?—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 02:04, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Through a player's perspective

message: I think that every pokemon should have an in-game sprite.
:.....They do Cheeze Master 17:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He means in the article. But believe me, the official artwork serves the purpose of illustrating the subject much more efficiently than a sprite...—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ (talk • contribs) 19:10, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The pictures in general.  

message: Have its own page. It is a very important Pokemon in the Pokemon games. I also think that Palkia and Giratina should get their own pages as well. Does anyone agree?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gelatart (talk • contribs) 18:39, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dialga should....