Talk:WWE brand extension/Archive 1

message: I think this draft page should stay the same because it would be better to have all the drafts on just one page. A draft is a draft  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.138.81.38 (talk) 23:50, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

message: I removed it as it was written like a rant with absolutely no authenticity and with plenty of spelling mistakes to boot.  --59.92.56.55 13:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Critism" (sic) section 

message: 2007 marks the 5th anniversary of WWE Brand Extension.134.124.143.149 15:30, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  5th anniversary of WWE Brand Extension 

message: When is the next draft lottery? should it be noted as a future event? 217.44.2.148 09:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Next? 

message: Is there going to be a draft lottery this year i would think so because there a three brands making more talent available...??Nosaints4life 00:22, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  draft lottery 2007 

message: I believe the two articles should be separate as they are two different subjects.  The draft is only a tool used after the brand split to shuffle Superstars around. It is also becoming an annual event whereas the brand split occurred only twice (the first time between Raw and Smackdown and the second time when ECW was added).  24.89.69.22 17:46, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Immediately after making the above comments, Nick Butler merged the articles anyway.  Is there not supposed to be a process before articles are merged? 24.89.69.22 17:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: does anyone know if injured wrestlers are gonna participate in the draft?? (ex: Triple H, HBK, King Booker etc). J.C. 05:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 draft 

message: if The Boogeyman went to ECW, shouldn't the Little Boogeyman go with him as well?? J.C. 03:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He didn't come out with The Boogeyman, so we can't assume it. Both Runjin Singh and Queen Sharmell came out with their picks. It's possible they used the Mark Henry incident on SmackDown to phase out the Little Boogeyman character. Lrrr IV 03:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

text: 1)Qualifying matches (which these basically are) aren't relevent to the draft itself, which the article is about. 2)Notice how the table looks nothing like the standard table used everywhere else in the article. I see no reason to use it. Lrrr IV 22:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

text: Please sign your posts, it is not difficult to do (if you do not know how, you type ~~~~). The page does look nicer when the tables conform to each other, and I don't think those matches are needed. You have not said why you think those matches should be included. Lrrr IV 01:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 Draft 

message: the Draft on 6/13 is changed to 6/17 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.241.220 (talk • contribs) 
:The date is already mentioned in the article. Lrrr IV 21:32, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  PostPone  

message: --124.179.248.152 08:32, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Kevin Nash was re-hired in 2002 by the WWE following the expiration of his (as well as Scott Hall and Hulk Hogans) contract with AOL-Time Warner. He didn't go to TNA until 2004. --Electricbolt 14:05, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kevin Nash? 

message: Isn't this wrong? It looks like RVD went to Raw and kurt Amgle went to Smackdown. They should both be under the ECW Table heading 220.244.235.241 10:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Change made. Mshake3 16:48, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 2006 (Brand Extension: ECW)

message: Now the 10 picks have offically decided back on 6/11/07.what if RAW superstars/divas going to Smackdown or ECW, Smackdown superstars/divas headed to RAW or ECW & ECW superstars/divas moving to RAW or Smackdown in supplementary draft? i'll  have to wait and find out.12.127.178.158 23:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Supplementary Draft 

message: Why did somebody put viscera and val venis for smackdown it doesnt mention it on wwe.com
:As of 30 minutes in to the draft, the only picks are Paul London and Brian Kendrick to Raw and Kenny Dykstra to Smackdown. Hermiod
::Viscera has now been drafted to ECW. Hermiod. Raw just picked The Sandman from ECW
::Hardcore Holly back to Smackdown
:::They have all the results of the supplementary draft on WWE.com. Should they be put into the article?JoeTBF13 14:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind...they were put in as I was typing that I guess.JoeTBF13 14:33, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  supplementary draft pick

message: I think the WWE Draft deserves it's own page.--  Hornetman16  19:00, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree too. I wanted to merge them originally based on the content of the original articles. But with some cleanup, perhaps they can be split again. Mshake3 23:08, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWE Draft 

message: It looks inconsistant and confusing. Comments? D4S 18:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It provides the best information possible. Mshake3 20:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The mixing of the colors is inconsistent with the previous charts, though. D4S 21:54, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's never been a draft with all three brands either. Once again, Quality>Consistancy. Mshake3 23:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 Chart Design 

message: Ok, I suggest the WWE Brand Extension and WWE Draft be split into two different articles because the Brand Extension was the act of separating talent into separate brands, while the Draft is the act of picking out talent from brands and switching them to a different brand like any sport draft.--TrUcO9311 16:25, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: Yeah... I'm going to have to agree with Mshake's reversion here. That was a pretty bad split.-- bulletproof 3:16 05:12, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spilt...