lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Chorazin

message: Talk:Khirbat Karraza. Onceinawhile (talk) 19:20, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khirbat Karraza talk page

message: The Biblical Reference paragraph states, "archaeologists have not yet been successful in finding a settlement dating to the first century."
The Archaeology 2nd paragraph states, "The site is an excavated ruin today, but was inhabited starting in the 1st century"
Please fix.
rolinbruno  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rolinbruno (talk • contribs) 20:07, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  CONFLICTING STATEMENTS 

message: Chorazin is not located anywhere. Israel did not exist at this time, and the usage is anachronistic. nableezy - 13:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Also the removal of the depopulation is straightforward tendentious editing, and will be reverted. nableezy - 13:13, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , the ancient village was destroyed more than a 1000 years ago. It was not depopulated in 1948 - a small pastoral community in the ruins was - but the village was gone before that.--Geshem Bracha (talk) 05:14, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: This article covers Khirbat Karraza as well, and the infobox includes material on it. nableezy - 10:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  anachronism 

message: All we have so far are doubts from the 17th and early 19th centuries! The initial 1st-century town is probably further north from the excavated area, so no more than a guess. However, the identification is usually stated with such certainty that there must be some clear arguments going for it, but which, offered by whom, etc.? Arminden (talk) 14:42, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Identification of Chorazin: who, when, how? How well accepted? 

message: Possibly: just stones from older, 1st c. synagogue in 2ndary use, with newer syn. built at site of the 1st. Many such stones identified all around newer syn. Surveys and excavations still underway as of 2023 all around the (newer) syn. Arminden (talk) 09:01, 17 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  2nd synagogue
Talk:Rafael Ángel Calderón Guardia

message: As somebody related to Calderón, I get the feeling this article was written by somebody related to Calderón.  I studied him back before the internet was particularly useful, and this article makes him look very good compared to the books I read back then.  I remember accusations that Picado was a puppet president, and for some reason I recall him doing several nasty things during his time as legitimate president (although I don't remember the attacks on Germans).  Long story short, I think there should be more explication of his and Picado's presidencies.  Maybe my sources from long ago were biased, but there needs to be more.49giantsharks (talk) 03:46, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article makes him look good 

message: The result of the elections of 48 were contested. It was a tense time. Ballots were burned, documents and census were claimed to be forged and then war erupted. Even though some may think or be sure that Ulate won the original election it can't be resolved accurately who won the election nowdays: it is a matter of speculation and people (still living people) from both sides would sustain that either candidate actually won (I know this from first had experience with my grandparents, in laws, and others from those times).
See http://www.elespiritudel48.org/4802.htm as per example, or http://www.museocostarica.go.cr/es_cr/en-detalle/la-guerra-civil-de-1948-una-s-ntesis.html?Itemid=115 , etc.
You will find, NPOV, that the election results were contested and then there was war...
--Crio de la Paz (talk) 04:29, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  War of 48 

message: The article just assumes that all President Calderon's policies were correct - that increasing government spending, taxation and regulations has only good effects (no bad ones). It reads more like a propaganda piece than a balanced reference article with arguments for and against the policies of this historical figure.2A02:C7F:96F6:5300:4DA1:ED7E:3FA3:2D1C (talk) 09:02, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article is incredibly biased - essentially propaganda.
Talk:Atlantic Beach Bridge

message: I just removed some talk in the article. If anyone wants to verify the info and add it to the article as encyclopediac text, feel free. (I italicize the reverted edit):
:The toll is $2.00 Does anyone know why this is the only toll bridge in Nassau and Suffolk counties? (Jan. 1, 2007) USD. E-ZPass is not accepted.  Yes, it's because E-ZPass would take part of the incoming toll revenue & make it easier for non residents to cross the bridge without having to wait in a line to pay. (Atlantic Beach wants to discourage ANYONE from entering Atlantic Beach from Queens!)
DMacks 17:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Achziv

message: ... two people and a bed and breakfast, at least.  +sj +
:See Akhzivland. -- Deborahjay (talk) 09:51, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about Achzivland? 

message: There appears to be a typo in the date given for the Chalcolithic Period.  Can someone identify what the dates here are meant to say? Downstrike (talk) 07:45, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date under Archaeology 

message: Should the two articles, Az-Zeeb and Achziv, be merged? Please discuss here and  make your decisions known above in the "Merge" section. GenQuest "Talk to Me" 22:36, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC regarding the above pending merge 

message: The lead paragraph presently includes the text: ...within the municipal area of Nahariya. Evidently the lands of Achziv are within the jurisdiction of the Mateh Asher Regional Council. I record this here until I can find a citable source, at which time I'll perform the edit. This also affects the categorization of files in Wikimedia Commons. -- Deborahjay (talk) 12:45, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nahariya vs Mateh Asher Regional Council
Talk:Charles Messier

message: For many other historical figures, we have a signature. Messier's I found here http://www.flickr.com/photos/deepskyvideos/7361102960/sizes/o/ but I have no time or patience to trace it and to research whether it's public domain. Can someone please do that? It would need to be an SVG file eventually. CielProfond (talk) 18:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Signature 

message: xkcd sent me here...
The quote about the booklet for Napoleon makes it seem like a grave and terrible thing that Messier did. To me this seems just a piece of trivia. I don't think we need to be so dramatic about Messier using his observations to seek favour with the current ruler. KarlFrei (talk) 20:47, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Napoleon
Talk:Atlit (modern town)

message: *'Atlit, from Zochrot
under "External links" is being deleted with the edit line "adds nothing to article." I disagree with this. The Zochrot article has much of the Khalidi text, for one thing. Pr  WP:EL this link belongs in the article. Huldra (talk) 23:22, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Please explain why does it belong.Also did the get approval from Khalidi to include text from his book?Shrike (talk) 08:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

text: "The Zochrot article has much of the Khalidi text, " therefore "adds nothing to article", Q.E.D. Three short paragraphs on a single small page, the gist of which is already in the article, don't really justify inclusion (WP:LINKFARM). Poliocretes (talk) 14:06, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: To me, it seems as if you both violate WP:NOTCENSOR Huldra (talk) 20:44, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Zochrot]] 

message: I think this should be mentioned in this article
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naval_ram--83.42.15.96 (talk) 18:39, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: What exactly do you think should be mentioned? —Ynhockey (Talk) 08:48, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Athlit Ram 
Talk:Puerto Banús

message: I think it should be known that the statue is based on Albrecht Durer's "RHINOCERVS" and not just "a statue of a rhinoceros by Salvador Dali".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.178.203.162 (talk) 17:10, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salvador Dali's Rhinoceros Statue 

message: http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puerto_Ban%C3%BAs Spanish Article has received a big change. Please review this article.--Maximo88 (talk) 23:29, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important 
Talk:Quepos

message: Fragments.  Not sentences.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.225.30.91 (talk) 03:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing needed 
Talk:Jérôme Lalande

message: Perhaps someone who knows could explain why he is known (here at least) as Jérôme Lalande, not Joseph? In correspondence relating to his relationship with Philibert Commerson he seems to be known as Joseph. Millichip (talk) 10:37, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Full of peacock words and boasting horrays! Nothing wrong with Jérôme Lalande, but the article is clearly trying some non-serious biography of the ueber-dashing kind. And too little about his accomplishments. Said: Rursus (☻) 18:44, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Icky biography

message: This source about Cook say:  Was this Lalande? If so, maybe Cook should be mentioned? 86.187.163.77 (talk) 20:05, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably. We could add it. Atlantlc27Lol (talk) 23:40, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[James Cook]]
Talk:Pierre Charles Le Monnier

message: Is Pierre Charles related to Louis Guillaume Lemonnier?
Canuckle 20:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. They were brothers. Lupo 08:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Louis Guillaume Lemonnier

message: * The article says "Le Monnier was admitted in 1739 to the Royal Society, and was one of the 144 original members of the Institute.". Which institute is this? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:08, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought it was of course the Royal Society. The problem, is, however, that the membership lists of the Royal Society lists him just as a "fellow", not as an "original fellow". They consider "original fellows" only people elected before July 1663, an they list exactly 118 "founder fellows" or "original fellows", not 144. An error in the 1911 EB, from where this sentence comes? Lupo 08:44, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which institute?
Talk:Scandinavian studies

message: :There are thirty-eight entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion. 
*ELpoints #3) states: 
*LINKFARM states: 
*WP:ELMIN: . 
*WP:ELCITE: 
*WP:ELBURDEN:   
:The above information is indicative of two things, 1)- Too many links were allowed to be added to the article, and 2)- Any links added back need to be with concensus and not subject to BRD. --  Otr500 (talk) 14:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Alexis Bouvard

message: Hum… What kind of source is “[Anon] 2001”? No link, no title, nothing to find it. Might as well not have any source! Does anyone out there have a reliable source?
CielProfond (talk) 23:54, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source? 

message: Therefore he was (haps) something like a (naturalised) French citizen?
It misreads: “was a French astronomer”
Yet reads: “ Born in Contamines, Duchy of Savoy” 2A00:23C7:2B13:9001:2943:2CB4:E698:D5F7 (talk) 23:34, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bouvard was born in Savoy not France
Talk:Dominique, comte de Cassini

message: This article should be entitled "Jean-Dominique Cassini de Thury" to be consistent with other English and German Wikipedia articles. (Frankly, I personally prefer "Jean-Dominique Cassini" as it is on fr.Wikipedia, but I'm not going to fight the system.) - - "Dominique" alone is incorrect. And adding a French court title into the title of this article (which most of them had) is rather pointless. - - Jean-Dominique is the fourth generation in a line of very important astronomers (think U.S. "Cassini Project") and map makers. Most often, he is cited in texts is "Cassini IV". His father, César-François Cassini de Thury, the most important of the bunch, is called "Cassini III". Both of the guys need redirect pages for these common nicknames, too. - - I could site a book source for you, but please see the bottom of the page for this article at fr.Wikipédia for quick proof: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carte_de_Cassini
(You can probably take are of these problems in minutes. It would take me hours to figure it out.) If you have a question, put it on my talk page. I won't have time to devote serious time to planning and writing these Cassini articles right away, so I may not see your post here. Thanks for you help!  Charvex (talk) 10:34, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Administrator Assistance Needed
Talk:Charles-Eugène Delaunay

message: Some suggestions for improvement as the article is expanded:
*Template:Infobox Scientist should be added 
*Photograph/portrait should be added from a source with a free license, if available
*Some basic biographical information required, including positions held (with dates)
*Article needs expanding and should emphasise reasons for notability of subject
*After expansion, article should be divided into appropriate subheadings
*Information on research should be expanded
*References should be expanded and preferably converted to inline format
*External link present which could be used to expand article
Espresso Addict 00:41, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Review comments
Talk:Benjamin Baillaud

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Natsubee 17:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Guillaume Bigourdan

message: Hi! I added as much as I could in the short period I worked on this; however, I have a few sources in French that an editor who is better at french than I am (not hard!) may gleam more information from. However, I added enough sources I decided I could take away the "source me!" banner. I'll be monitoring the page, so if there's any issues, please let me know!
Hat Jul (talk) 19:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding More information
Talk:Kola Norwegians

message: The article points out that many children [by the end of World War Two] had been raised without learning to speak Norwegian. How is this noteworthy ? 80 to 90 years after their ancestors immigrated into a country that doesn't speak Norwegian, this is to be expected... I would think (especially considering the harsh penalties imposed by the Stalin regime, as mentioned in two paragraphs above this). And they weren't even deported to Norway but moved to another part of the USSR. There was probably no need to speak Norwegian there either.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.66.170 (talk) 05:26, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  When in Russia, speak Russian... right ? 
Talk:Louis Boyer (astronomer)

message: I have removed the following text because there seems no reason to keep it:(and not to be confused with any real or fictional chef so named)Which chef would this be?
If anybody has a good reason for mentioning this, with a proper source, please put it back with my blessing.
HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 18:00, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chef? 
Talk:Beaver, West Virginia

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 23:49, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Lawrence Herchmer

message: It seems to be a matter of interpretation as to whether he was the first civilian commissioner, so I edited the article to allow the reader to make the interpretation.  --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 12:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First civilian commissioner 
Talk:Beckley, West Virginia

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 23:50, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

message: To the best of my knowledge, Little Jimmy Dickens did not live in Beckley, he grew up in Bolt, West VirginiaCoal town guy (talk) 13:34, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Notable Natives and residents " 

message: I suggest that someone familiar with the subject check this article, in particular this section, throughly.    TomS TDotO (talk) 16:52, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  citation 
Talk:Pierre Antonini

message: I've used the dates of the corresponding IAUC for each supernova: someone who knows more about this please replace with the correct "date of discovery" if appropriate, please.
TIA HAND —Phil | Talk 13:37, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates of discovery 
Talk:William Leonard Higgitt

message: The name of the subject of this article is William Leonard Higgitt, not "William Higgitt".  All of the literature out there, including his time with the RCMP and Interpol, refers to him by the name of William Leonard Higgitt.  Leonard was his used name. 2604:3D08:6379:9800:47C:7B82:8533:802A (talk) 19:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 04:54, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This "William Higgitt" page should be retitled (i.e., "moved") to read William Leonard Higgitt.
Talk:Odette Bancilhon

message: I was able to add an informative ref and add more info. Now, it's no longer a stub.
AMM Pittsburgh (talk) 21:49, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note
Talk:Oriole Beach, Florida

message: I can't find any sources for this community beyond travel sites, mentions in articles about Pensacola, and news articles about school sports teams. If anyone can help, please add sources! Leschnei (talk) 11:47, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Added a sentence about census information with references - pretty lame, but the best I could do with google. Leschnei (talk) 13:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs references
Talk:Leonard Nicholson

message: Leonard H. Nicholson=Leonard Nicholson?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. Found a source which confirms that the RCMP Commissioner and the deputy chief scout were the same person, so I've merged the articles and added that source accordingly. Bearcat (talk) 18:04, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  possibly same person?
Talk:P. Briault

message: This may be Paul Briault, a member of the Société astronomique de France as of 1915. Praemonitus (talk) 20:53, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul Briault
Talk:Nicole-Reine Lepaute

message: I'd like to add some details about Nicole's personal life as well as all of her accomplishments as a female mathematician in the 1700s. I feel like she is an amazing person and want to show the world more about her. NoetherIsLikeNoOther (talk) 01:15, 4 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible Edits
Talk:Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police

message: If Osborne Smith was acting commissioner, and French was the first commissioner, why are they listed as 1 and 2.  
Shouldn't Osborne Smith and Busson be in the list of acting commissioners alongside Wood? 
--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 12:56, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing numbering 

message: The only citation given for stating that the Queen is the Commissioner-in-chief is in the Toronto Star article, which does not give any detail.  However, there is nothing in the RCMP Act which refers to the Queen being Commissioner-in-Chief.  From the Star article, it sounds as if HM was "bumped up" to honorary Commissioner-in-Chief to make room for Prince Charles to be named "Honorary Commissioner". Unless someone can find a more definite reference, I think it should read "Honorary Commissioner-in-chief."  Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 05:24, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Queen as Commissioner-in-Chief
Talk:Augustin Royer

message: Does anyone know how to fix the infobox here? The edit page just has a double bracket {} and the text constellationsroyeraltered; any ideas? Xyl 54 13:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Étienne Léopold Trouvelot

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 20:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Dorothea Klumpke

message: The third paragraph of the Works section, says " 1896 [...} romance was about to enter her life. She met up with Dr. Isaac Roberts, a 67-year-old Welsh widower and entrepreneur turned astronomer ... ". 
However, his Wikipedia page says that his first wife, Ellen, was buried in Liverpool in 1901  - so, was he, as described, a widower when they met? Owengwynne (talk) 17:41, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marital status of her later spouse when they initially met
Template talk:Yugoslav royal family

message: A request for comments which may impact this template has been started at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies#RfC on style in royal family templates. You are welcome to comment there. Fram (talk) 14:32, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: RfC notification

message: Before I took out the entries on this template which are not linked to articles and therefore  there is no way to verify them, I asked about this issues at AN . The replies I got indicated that entries such as  Princess Marija with no link to an article should be removed. WP:EXISTING says "Unlinked text should be avoided." Also per MOS:HONORIFIC "In general, honorific prefixes—styles and honorifics in front of a name—in Wikipedia's own voice should not be included, but may be discussed in the article." This isn't an article, honorifics should not be used in this template. I made these changes but User:Snake bgd reverted them, marking the edit as "minor" which it certainly wasn't. I am undoing the reversion.Smeat75 (talk) 14:38, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navboxes should not contain entries which do not link to articles
Talk:Gásadalur

message: A map letting people know where in the world the Faroe Islands are, and where Vágar is located among that group of islands, would enhance the usefulness of this article.  Lunarmovements (talk) 23:03, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about a map? 
Talk:Mykines, Mykines

message: The usage and primary topic of Mykines is under discussion, see talk:Mykines (disambiguation) -- 70.51.46.39 (talk) 07:22, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "Mykines"
Talk:Sumatran dollar

message: Sumatra was never a country as such... and still isn't one.  It was a hodgepot of kingdoms - Acheh, Srivijaya, etc., until the europeans arrived.  The British took possession of Bencoolen (on the west coast of the island, it is known as Bengkulu today) as a colony as it was part of the route from the Cape to China (no Suez Canal then!), and that is probably where this coin was used.  The date 1824 is significant as it is the date of the Anglo-Dutch Treaty of 1824 or the Treaty of London.  --Novelty (talk) 07:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you provide some references for your edits? In particular, please note that coins weren't just issued in the name of Fort Marlborough.Dove1950 (talk) 17:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)