lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Happy Traum

message: Much of what's included in this article was lifted directly from happytraum.com. More material is needed to replace this. I'll do what I can, but help from others who know Traum's background better would help. Thanks. Allreet (talk) 22:33, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: For clarification on "Blowin' in the Wind" claims: Traum's site says the Broadside sessions were in 1963 (as did the Wikipedia article). The album was released early in 1963, but was recorded in late 1962. AllMusic gives 1964 for the album's release, but Smithsonian gets it right with 1963. Dylan recorded the song for Columbia in July 1962 at the third Freewheelin' session. However, his album wasn't released until a year later, the same summer that Peter, Paul & Mary released their single. Thus, the New World Singers version scooped everyone. Allreet (talk) 22:51, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More research/material needed 

message: Has a references and a notes section. Can't the reference be included in the inline citations? Cleanelephant (talk) 20:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: Basic information (which anyone visiting this article might expect to find here) to add to this article, in order to help make it more properly encyclopedic: how/when Traum got the nickname "Happy." 98.123.38.211 (talk) 02:23, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  To add to article
Talk:Shepherd Mead

message: ==Untitled==
This article is almost totally unreferenced.  While I do not dispute the factual accuracy (actually I know it is all true) it still needs refs.  The imdb link is a good start.  I am now trying to find a list of his books with reviews if possible. Bobprime (talk) 19:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced 

message: This article is almost totally unreferenced.  While I do not dispute the factual accuracy (actually I know it is all true) it still needs refs.  The imdb link is a good start.  I am now trying to find a list of his books with reviews if possible. Bobprime (talk) 19:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Islam in Montenegro

message: I do not believe that "Slavic Muslims" was not put in the correct context in the Demographics section, because it would also include Bosniaks and even maybe Muslim Montenegrins. I changed it to "Muslims by country" since it is also in the first place where the populaiton numbers came from. 76.166.177.72 (talk) 17:00, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Slavic Muslims

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/may2006/montenegro.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  TreyGeek (talk) 23:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: There should be a separate article called Ahmadiyya in Montenegro...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.182.102.114 (talk) 12:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: You are more than welcome to create one.--Peaceworld 18:56, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Seperate Article
Talk:Red Allen (bluegrass)

message: Most of the interwikis from here lead to articles about Bluegrass music in general, rather than to musician Red Allen. In my humble opinion, Blugrass could be a disambiguous page, where the certain grass was one meaning; Kentucky Bluegrass region another meaning, Blugrass music a third meaning, and possibly a fourth pointer could go to a list or table with references to some of the many Bluegrass musicians who've got articles. Anyway, first step will have to be disabling of all the current interwikis to Bluegrass, the music form.
Again, my fingers were faster than my brain; you DO have that disambiguous page already. My fault. Rgds from Norway, TorSch (talk) 21:06, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading interwikis
Talk:Gaussian vault

message: This page was found on the auto-bio list by a bot.  I think it should be merged with the methematician's article. Bearian 22:39, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's an attempt to write about the architectural structure called the Gaussian vault: I've redirected it to Eladio Dieste, who pioneered it, and will expand the detail there. Tearlach 11:03, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:James Bond video games

message: The videogame doesn't have much more than a mention in the article. It doesn't even have a title yet! As such, I fail to see why it is necessary to put it in the box. SpinyMcSpleen 05:52, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bond 22 

message: Is it strictly correct to list Nintendo as the maker of this game? They published it, but they certainly didn't MAKE it; Rare did. AlbertSimon (talk) 18:20, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goldeneye 007 

message: Though the box is titled "James Bond video games", the first two links go to Parker Brothers games, which aren't video games. Perhaps the title should be changed. Dustman15 (talk) 12:20, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Video Game"
Talk:Siddhidas Mahaju

message: goodly 43.231.209.33 (talk) 04:52, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nepal bhasa siddhidas mahaju about.
Talk:Heere Heeresma

message: "A Day at the Beach (1962) was made into a movie twice: first in 1970 by Roman Polanski (A Day at the Beach) and in 1984 by Dutch cineast Theo van Gogh (film director)."
"by" implies that Polanski was the director - which he was definitely NOT.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.123.104 (talk) 18:56, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "by" Polanski
Talk:Sinéad Lohan

message: The website link seems to be off - yes, it is also www.sineadlohan.com but it seems to be the personal page of a guy named George Clark.
Thaddeus Ryan (talk) 14:04, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was she born?
Was it on some date?
Should that date be in this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.29.198 (talk) 10:59, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth 

message: if any one has access to the full interview:
* an interview
-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:15, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  potential sources
Talk:Eric Green (tight end)

message: The redirect Elijah Green has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Joeykai (talk) 22:32, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Elijah Green]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Calabrian

message: Calabrian is the correct English term for the people/language of Calabria; however, I think "Calabrese" (which is also sometimes used in English) should link to this or a disambiguation page instead of the little known musical group (as it does now). I would do this myself except I am not adept at this sort of stuff. Can someone help? Thanks 66.183.217.31 22:51, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Surnames of Montenegrin origin

message: Montenegrin language origin? what does that even mean? It should be Serbian-language origin in that case since the Montenegrin idiom was registered as Serbian prior to the Montenegrin independence, and surnames with history millenia older than the first mention of "montenegrin" i.e. the Serbian surnames labeled as Montenegrin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.32.37.3 (talk) 04:21, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Montenegrin-language surnames merely donates Montenegrin origin. --Kilibarda (talk) 06:03, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Spencer Ackerman

message: Unaddressed COI from WP:SPA Loksmythe (talk) 13:47, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , is there something beyond what you addressed with the editor on their talk page? Innisfree987 (talk) 14:57, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , WP:DUCK in my opinion. WP:SPA engaged in WP:PROMO who clearly has previous editing experience. Loksmythe (talk) 01:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , for me the thing is you asked and got an answer. I sort of think, if you feel it’s past what you can accept AGF, it belongs at WP:COIN to get a consensus on how to handle. Here it seems just reiterating concerns already asked and answered. Innisfree987 (talk) 02:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag still appropriate IMO. This article is really heavy on the primary sourced promotion - David Gerard (talk) 12:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I agree now: the issues were not addressed unfortunately. Innisfree987 (talk) 17:27, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: If anyone else has time to pitch in cutting it back, I’d be grateful. It was 112kb when I started and it’s down by half but still far too detailed. Fresh eyes would be very welcome. Innisfree987 (talk) 21:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI tag (August 2021)
Talk:Languages of Montenegro

message: Suggestion if a "growing movement" to exclusively latinize the language in the introduction paragraph is unsourced and seems sympathetic toward that outcome, rather than objective. Robertcaseydavis (talk) 03:57, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Latinization of Montenegrin suggested in intro 

message: The 11% for Serbian language is clearly wrong if it is the most common language and 43% is second. I looked at the census link and couldn't figure out the correct numbers. 24.63.60.166 (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Percentage for Serbian
Talk:Stefan Grabiński

message: Could somebody add to the article the Czech translation published 2012 ? 
V domě Sáry a jiné povídky / Stefan Grabiński ; from Polish,  translated by Libor Martinek, published in/by Praha / Volvox Globator, 2012
--Svenkaj (talk) 15:15, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Czech translation
Talk:Steffan O'Sullivan

message: This article should be merged with FUDGE as the subject fails notability guideline WP:BIO. --Gavin Collins 09:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I also want to add that Bunnies and Burrows is also notable, as proven in that article. This supports the second clause I copied above. Turlo Lomon 15:35, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger Discussion
Talk:Montenegrin cuisine

message: "A piece of seasonal fruit is the most common way to end the pumpkintypical of Mediterranean cuisine.
The word punkintypical, I cant find this on google,Can anyone expand on Pumkintypical....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.130.3.198 (talk) 03:00, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  pumpkintypical  

message: I spent well over a year in Montenegro and... this article is wildly inaccurate.  It is so bad that it isn't really worth saving.  It's better to start over.  It's better that someone who has actually been to Montenegro starts over on this topic.
94.189.246.219 (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who wrote this stuff? 
Talk:Southern Malaita languages

message: The article says "It [The family of Southern Malaita languages] consists of 5 languages", but then lists only four.  Malaita languages, too, lists only four.  Was one forgotten in the list, or... did someone type "5" for some reason?  Seems a strange typo! -Sean M. Burke (talk) 03:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Many?
Talk:Stephen Booth (writer)

message: Not sure how to do it, but he has a new book out, Claws. Thanks!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by PetePharm (talk • contribs) 18:44, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sorry to rush in with such a hasty response but it's done now. I can't add it to the main 1-18 list as it screws the novel numbering so I just made it its own little category with a sad little ul as an ol with ONE item just looks daft. Ho hum. Best wishes to all DBaK (talk) 18:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update Please! 
Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 60

message: Qaulity is to vague.
like this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by SSholden (talk • contribs) 00:06, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality Issue 

message: As a European I do not understand the measures, please write the decimal system, too. TIA. --Schwarzschachtel (talk) 13:13, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ounce and inches versus gramm and centimeters 

message: Shortest J-frame barrel is 1.875", not 2.125"; which is the lenght of the shortest J-magnum (1996 and newer "model 60" revolvers).
Also the weights are for the newer model 60, which are a little heavier because they are 0.357 magnum guns.  Original "j-frame" model 60 weighed little over 19 ounces (like the model 36) in the 1.875" barrel lenght.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.62.237.145 (talk) 16:30, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Specs are for newer "J-magnum" frame guns only, not for original J-frame .38 spl guns 

message: I removed the "Engineering and Production Changes Timeline" because it is unsourced. Additionally, listed items such as "60-1 (1972) 3 in square butt limited production" and "60-2 (1987) DAO NYPD?" are difficult to interpret and may be trivial. Preserving content here. –dlthewave ☎ 23:10, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced section
Talk:ꞋAreꞌare language

message: Information about the culture of the 'Are'are people (the whole section on musical culture, as well as some sentences in the section on language usage) should be moved to the article on the 'Are'are people, rather than appearing on this site. Kevinbaet (talk) 02:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: More examples should be provided in the section on grammar structure, especially in the subsections on tense and nouns. Kevinbaet (talk) 02:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  More examples 

message: The pronominal paradigm should be presented in the relevant section. Kevinbaet (talk) 02:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronouns 

message: The introduction to this subsection is not very clear and should be rephrased. Also, examples for the different types of verbs should be provided. Kevinbaet (talk) 02:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verb subsection
Talk:Stephen Davis (screenwriter)

message: The imdb link gives date of birth 1969. If this is the Stephen Davies who wrote 'People from the forest' , 1981, about the Russian dissident Andrei Sakharov I reckon the 1950 wikipedia date is right, but ..just thought I'd mention it.Sayerslle (talk) 22:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Birth
Talk:Sa'a language

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=o2UOAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Rajmaan (talk) 03:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dictionary and grammar of the language of Saʻa and Ulawa, Solomon islands  By Walter George Ivens (1918)
Talk:Stephen Elliott (author)

message: Links to stories and interviews that appear in SmokeLong were removed, apparently because I was the person who added them, and I am the editor of SmokeLong. That said, I've added other links for authors to other interviews and stories in other literary magazines that have a similar relevance to SmokeLong, and those have not been removed. Should SmokeLong not be considered for relevant links just because one of its editors happens to be a Wikipedia editor as well?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaveClapper (talk • contribs) 19:51, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: SmokeLong links

message: Let us remove unsubstantiated gossip and keep only RS court charges and sentences. Zezen (talk) 10:20, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP violation 

message: Here's a link to an article about it. Lawsuit has been settled. Someone might want to update the allegation section with the news. 2001:569:5082:BD00:D9C2:AD49:16D5:90E9 (talk) 11:42, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   Stephen Elliott receives payout from Moira Donegan
Talk:Oroha language

message: In the phonology section it is said that reduplication "emphasizes" the meaning of words. "Emphasis" is a very vague term. This should be specified, ideally also giving examples for illustration. The last sentence on the sub-section on reduplication isn't very clear either. Does it mean that the different types of reduplication all have the same function? Again, examples should be given. Kevinbaet (talk) 18:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Function of reduplication 

message: Many affixes are not given any gloss. That should be added. Also, what is a "prefectural" prefix? Kevinbaet (talk) 18:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glossing of affixes and particles 

message: This one should be presented in 3-line interlinear glossing tradition. Kevinbaet (talk) 18:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example sentence in Syntax section
Talk:Snipping Tool

message: Is this really needed?  In it's current form it seems more like an advertisement.  It only lists two alternative programs.  Also, the article already links to a Wikipedia category for screenshot software (at the bottom).  --24.182.161.101 (talk) 19:02, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative software 

message: The first reference link, http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/products/features/snipping-tool, is (effectively) broken. --Mortense (talk) 19:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken reference 

message: Without the delay feature it would not be possible to take a screenshot showing context menus and object handles because these disappear when any other item (such as the Snipping Tool itself) is clicked on. is inaccurate.  You can open the snipping tool and then take screenshots of things by hovering your mouse where you want and pressing . 172.101.5.82 (talk) 21:08, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  delay 

message: Recent Windows 11 builds (22000.132) have introduced an updated version of a Snip & Sketch app which is now called Snipping Tool, while the old tool has been fully removed. It would make sense to me that articles on the two tools should therefore be merged, considering they are both built-in Windows features that serve the same purpose and both are now called the same. --Raito wa Kira desu (talk) 08:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Approve: Agree as per above Nathanielcwm (talk) 02:31, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Strong Approve: Since the old Snipping Tool is being completely phased out with Snip & Sketch being rebranded to just "Snipping Tool", and to avoid having to make a "Snipping Tool (Windows 11)" article, we should go ahead with this. --Zenphia (talk) 16:58, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from Snip & Sketch
Talk:Stephen Thompson (journalist)

message: I am a student at Towson University taking a class about Editing and American Editors.  We are doing class projects to expand the wikipedia pages of certain American authors.  I am looking for any information on Stephen Thompson that can help me better create and maintain his wikipedia page.  Any comments or information would be appreciated. Jbreen133 (talk) 20:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Thibodaux, Louisiana

message: I've added the talk page template for WP:LABOR.  This article would seem to fall in that project's scope, given the content regarding the Thibodaux Massacre. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 18:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ERROR: James Major was a Confederate officer, not a Union officer. This is easily seen by the link to his biography provided by the reviser. He would hardly have been in charge of a Union retreat, since he was on the other side!
ERROR: The reviser misstates the date of the so-called Thibodaux Massacre as November 22 rather than November 23, 1887. The precipitating event, the ambush and wounding of two pickets by black strikers, is conveniently omitted.  The reviser further claims that "at least 50" and possibly "hundreds" of black persons were killed, without any supporting documentation of this "fact." Reference to John DeSantis's detailed book, The Thibodaux Massacre, and multiple contemporary newspaper accounts suggest that the death count did not exceed 35.
Djogo (talk) 16:52, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent inaccurate revisions: June 24, 2021 

message: I need to talk to someone about this situation please contact me Jeremie Moran thanks for your time and conserns .....
337-313-4363 2600:1700:4490:3620:AD14:B2F9:4028:29F1 (talk) 01:03, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I got fired today for lies from management
Talk:Known-plaintext attack

message: is AES vulnerable to such attack? 85.250.35.237 23:09, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

message: I rated this article as Start-class (since it's fairly long and well-referenced, albeit not comprehensive at all) and High-importance (by analogy to the similar topics Known-ciphertext attack and Chosen-ciphertext attack.) Please review; thanks.Duckmather (talk) 17:07, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rated article 

message: Apokrif (talk) 23:40, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article should say which (types of) ciphers (besides OTP) are '''not''' vulnerable to known-plaintext attacks. 

message: This is an active and on going concern for cryptography today and the article only talks about history.
There needs to be modern examples, demonstrated via code, and if possible links to methods which counter this kind of attack.
"Make the changes yourself" - no, editing wikipedia is a complete waste of time without personally knowing a moderator/janny. 219.89.51.203 (talk) 11:46, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the suggestion. Feel free to make the changes yourself. You don't need to personally know a moderator. --Srleffler (talk) 06:57, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page needs huge improvements - mostly irrelevant
Talk:Big Nambas language

message: Where did it get its name "Big Nambas".  Sounds like "Big Numbers".  --24.31.187.238 21:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A namba is a Vanuatuan penis sheath. So it's named after the group that typically speaks it, which is named for the size of their penis sheaths. Auvon (talk) 01:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of name
Talk:Steve Proffitt

message: Hello, I'm concerned that Steve Proffitt wrote this article himself. The article was created by user "Proffitt" in 2006 and as far as I can tell, the only human contribution since then has been by another user named "Steveproffitt".  This is concerning for obvious reasons. Pse1996 (talk) 05:27, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Central Vanuatu languages

message: The Polynesian wanderings, tracks of the migration deduced from an examination of the proto-Samoan content of Efaté and other languages of Melanesia (1911)
https://archive.org/details/cu31924029870387
https://archive.org/details/polynesianwander00chur
https://archive.org/details/polynesianwander01chur
Rajmaan (talk) 15:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Polynesian wanderings, tracks of the migration deduced from an examination of the proto-Samoan content of Efaté and other languages of Melanesia (1911)