Talk:Jonathan Zenneck

message: I read in a radio magazine (QST - sept 1917,  I believe) that states Mr. Zenneck was jailed for suspicion of sending non-neutral messages to Germany. This is the only reference I have seen on this. Does anyone else have any more information on this?
Ktheis42 (talk) 01:07, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Removed.
----
PLANE ZENNECK WAVES.
J. Zenneck [1], in 1907, was the first to analyze a solution of Maxwell's equations that had a "surface wave" property. This so-called Zenneck wave is simply a vertically polarized plane wave solution to Maxwell's equations in the presence of a planar boundary that separates free space from a half space with a finite conductivity. For large conductivity -- this depends on the frequency and dielectric constant, too -- such a wave has a Poynting vector that is approximately parallel to the planar boundary. The amplitude of this wave decays exponentially in the directions both parallel and perpendicular to the boundary (with differing decay constants). 
It is worth emphasizing at the outset that the term "surface wave" is often a misnomer. We should attach no more significance to the phenomenon than the equations that describe it imply. The term surface wave conjures up an image of energy flow that is confined to a region that is localized at or near the surface. Whereas this is true for acoustic surface waves or certain classes of seismic waves, for example, it is generally not true for the phenomenon that we are discussing here. In our case, the boundary generally does not serve to localize the energy associated with the phenomenon; rather it just serves to guide the wave. Most of the energy of the wave is not near the surface. More accurately, for the case of vertical polarization, the presence of the conducting boundary allows the energy of the wave to extend down to the boundary in a significant manner (in contrast to the horizontally polarized case where the boundary condition mostly excludes the wave from the region near the surface). When we allow the boundary to be curved, as in the case of propagation around a sphere, the curvature of the surface leads to diffraction effects, yielding propagation of the wave beyond the geometrical horizon. The electromagnetic surface waves that we are discussing are no more magical than these phenomena. Their analysis is, however, somewhat complicated. 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. CYLINDRICAL ZENNECK WAVES AND THE VERTICAL DIPOLE RADIATOR.
The plane Zenneck wave, of course, is only of technical interest since such a wave requires a source that is infinite in extent for its creation. The same is true if we consider such a wave with cylindrical symmetry: such a wave requires an infinite line source for its generation. What is tantalizing about such a cylindrical Zenneck wave is the fact that (aside from the exponential decay factors) its field is inversely proportional to the square root of r, rather than to r itself as would be true for usual free space propagation with a source of finite extent. Again, this is not unexpected; it is simply due to the approximate two-dimensional nature of the propagation problem. 
However, another question arises when considering a point source, such as an oscillating vertical electric dipole, located over this conducting plane. Far from the source, does the field from such a vertical dipole behave like the cylindrical Zenneck wave? Certainly the answer to this question depends upon which direction one looks in; but, near the boundary, there exists the possibility that the field might be approximated by that of the cylindrical Zenneck wave. This problem was analyzed in detail by Sommerfeld [2] who first concluded that the field of this dipole does go over to that of the cylindrical Zenneck wave near the surface as the distance is increased. However, Sommerfeld made a famous sign error that he later corrected and which was rediscovered later by others. The corrected conclusions were that, in an intermediate region and near the surface, the field is approximated by that of the cylindrical Zenneck wave; but then, as the distance increases further, its decay goes over to the 1/r dipole form (modified slightly by the presence of the conducting surface): the direct wave overcomes the Zenneck mode at large distances over a planar boundary. (These issues are discussed in great detail in the book by Baños .Even though the wave does not have the Zenneck form in general, there is still the important contrast between the vertical and horizontal polarizations (the latter being the case for a horizontal electric dipole). In the case of vertical polarization the field extends down to the surface. 
When we consider the problem of a vertical electric dipole radiator over a conducting sphere we realize that, beyond the geometrical horizon, the only part of the field that exists is that which arrives there via diffraction: there is no direct ray. (We are, of course, ignoring ionospheric reflections here and we are not considering ``anomalous propagation via atmospheric ducting which may, however, occur frequently in the ocean environment.) Furthermore, since diffraction becomes more efficient at routing the electromagnetic energy around the curve of the earth as the frequency is decreased, the HF frequency region turns out to be the frequency range of choice. In fact, it can be shown that the field in this region is just a sum of modes that are a solution to the problem of the cylindrical Zenneck wave over a conducting sphere (in contrast to the planar boundary case just mentioned). This problem of a vertical electric dipole radiator over a conducting sphere was originally analyzed by Sommerfeld, whose motivation was the analysis of the propagation of radio waves around the earth; it was not realized at that time that the main mode of such propagation for large distances is via ionospheric reflections. This work is reviewed in , along with a discussion of the planar boundary case. Sommerfeld's solution was reexpressed in terms of Airy functions by Fock , (also discussed in Wait's book ).
----
--J. D. Redding 19:02, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed from article