Talk:Adelaide city centre

message: The current (and tired looking) infobox image is 7 years old and needs an update. Would somebody like to take a few photos and post them so we can vote and decide here? 121.220.222.63 (talk) 05:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 1) The current infobox image is 7 years old and needs an update. - Why? Prior to commencing construction of the absurdly-expensive-footbridge, a photo from the same spot would look very similar (except, perhaps, for the logos on buildings). And it is a very nice, bright, sharp photo with a nice blue sky, and the Torrens Lake actually looks attractive. I don't see any reason to replace it. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:18, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

text: The current (and tired looking) infobox image - Why do you say the current image is "tired looking"? Pdfpdf (talk) 13:18, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

text: 2) Of the second picture, you said: It shows every aspect of the CBD, and has a better advantage point, because it's an aerial photo, depicting the entire structure of the city centre. - Well that is not quite accurate, is it. a) Yes, an aerial photo gives a different view, but I'm not convinced that is "better". Different, yes. "Better", not necessarily. b) The photo does not show "every aspect of the CBD". And anyway, the article is about the Adelaide City Centre - not the CBD. c) Nor does the photo depict "the entire structure of the city centre" - not even close.  All it shows is a portion of the CBD. (This does NOT mean that I don't like the photo. It means that the photo is NOT what you said it is.) Pdfpdf (talk) 13:18, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

text: 3) If you want an aerial photo of the Adelaide city centre, the third picture is infinitely better at showing it. Not necessarily an infinitely better photo, but infinitely better at showing the Adelaide city centre. Pdfpdf (talk) 13:18, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please update infobox image  

message: Stuff prior to 2012 archived. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:30, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: 2012 stuff archived at /Archive 1#Stuff from 2012 Pdfpdf (talk) 12:54, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[/Archive 1]] 

message: As discussed above, I've moved the photos into a <gallery> in a "Gallery" section at the bottom of the article.  In my opinion, the panoramas look horrible. How about we restore them to 500px format and place them after the <gallery>, but still within the "Gallery" section? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 15:43, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, the panoramas do suffer in a gallery section. I don't mind where you place them as long as it's not in the gallery, where the quality/clarity is compromised.Ashton 29 (talk) 01:43, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments on panorama photographs appearing in a <nowiki><gallery></nowiki>

message: If Ashton 29 is in the mood to rewrite the section using ABS 2011 census data, I expect I would be unlikely to object. If he isn't, I expect I'll probably add such a section when the 2016 census data becomes available. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:45, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments on Demographics

message: Super high-speed internet would be available across the CBD under plans to be investigated by Adelaide City Council. A special optic cable network would provide web speeds of up to 10gigabites a second, Lord Mayor Martin Haese says. - Mayor's call for a special inquiry was unanimously backed by councillors. A staff report is due to be completed by September before any formal decision is made. InDaily. The Advertiser. Timeshift (talk) 13:07, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  10gbps internet for the CBD/North Adelaide 

message: In the various depictions of Lights layout of Adelaide, the "City Acres" appear to be congruent. If so, does anyone know what were their dimensions? By crude scaling, each street frontage appears to be around 200 ft and the depth somewhat greater. If they were truly an acre, ie. 43,560 sq.ft. these dimensions ought to lie within the range 181.5 x 240 ft. and 200 x 217.8 ft. Doug butler (talk) 03:46, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Guessing they were meant to be 70x70 yards (210x210 ft or 1.01 acres). This based on using the PLB (http://maps.sa.gov.au/plb/) measuring tool on the 2 city acres between Bartels Road and Flinders Street. Donama (talk) 23:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  City acres 

message: There is no information on transport.
:It's covered in Adelaide#Transport and Transport in Adelaide. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 13:59, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transport