Talk:Los Alamos, New Mexico

message: "While it is just a guideline and there are no requirements to follow it in editing, it contains some of the basic elements of a city article, as well as useful tips that would help to bring the article to good article or featured article status."
Los Alamos, though small in size, is significant! This page deserves more attention––the distinctive history and nature of this town should be preserved in a way that gives it special honor.Patrick Fisher 18:06, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/US Guideline|WikiProject Cities––US Guidelines]]

message: While information in the history section of this article may be true, there are no citations for this information. 
This article as a whole is vastly under-cited! Patrick Fisher 17:56, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: History Section Without Citations

message: There are lots of stats in the demographics section, but there should be comparison with the larger region/state/country. This is significant because Los Alamos is demographically unique in comparison to the rest of New Mexico.Patrick Fisher 19:36, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Demographics

message: It seems the mesas may be formed by the lava flowing out of the valles caldera. A google map satellite view seems to indicate this, rather than the glacial erosion theory mentioned in the article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.121.139.226 (talk) 00:18, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Formation of the mesas

message: I recently was downtown and I decided to take a photograph of Central Avenue. I put the photograph under the section where it says Skyline_image. Is this okay becuase Los Alamos doesn't have a skyline I am not completely sure, should it be placed there? Atomic City505 (talk) 03:10, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Most definitely it's okay.  Only a skyline picture should be there if there's a skyline picture available, but if one isn't available — especially if there's no skyline to get a picture of — there's nothing wrong with having another representative community picture there instead.  Nyttend (talk) 03:13, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Nyttend I really wasn't sure if it should belong in that section! Atomic City505 (talk) 01:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo of Downtown Los Alamos

message: Does anyone know what kind of restrictions were put on civilians travelling to or working in Los Alamos during WWII and the cold war? Could Los Alamos fit the description of a "Closed city"? Seabhcán 11:00, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: War restrictions

message: The only photo displayed for this article captures one of the most unsightly areas in a very beautiful town. Since I will be in Los Alamos somtime this summer, I'll be sure to take some pictures, representing the real, Los Alamos.EnglishEfternamntalkcontribs 22:37, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How long did you live in Los Alamos? Yaush (talk) 15:44, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo does not do the town justice

message: Lots of good stuff added, but it needs citations and it was all one loooooong paragraph. I tried my hand at fixing the latter problem, but more polishing seems in order.
Also, there are a couple of dubious statements and some missing information. It would be good to know when homesteading began -- was this under Spanish colonial rule or U.S. rule? The statement that the price paid by the Army for the land during World War II was less that fair is an opinion, needs to be written as an opinion, and then cited to reliable sources expressing the opinion -- regardless of how plausible and likely to be correct the opinion seems. The statement that the location for White Rock was chosen because it was a "safe" distance from the lab needs a cite; I find it a bit dubious myself. My impression is that White Rock was located where it was located because there is precious little land outside the original four mesas that is flat enough for residential development and is not on tribal land. Yaush (talk) 05:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  New historical material 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
يكتب  هذه  الصفحة  سامر  كرم  معاز   مسيحي  من  قرية  ربلة  سورية   
الغرافيك   مادة  تتحمل  درجة حرارة  محدودة  في  المفاعلات  القديمة  وتتشقق
ينصح   سامر   بخلط  السوليفان  4   المدمج   مع  النيكل 7   تفاعل يصدر عنه  مادة مصقولة  تتحمل  درجات حرارة  عالية فوق  7000 فهرنهايت 
وننصح  بصناعة المادة  المصقولة  النهائية جسور متراصة  وصفوفة لكي تلف  مع  الجدران 
او  صناعتها  جدران  على  طريقة الجبس  بورد  الواح 5سم  وتركيبها فوق سكك داخل  المفاعلات  
مع  تحيات  سامر 
—5.0.152.128 (talk) 11:53, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't understand Arabic, but I ran the message above through Google Translate, and (while it's not clear what, if any, changes the poster is recommending with regard to the content of this article) it's clear that the message has nothing to do with the coordinates in the article. I'm therefore deactivating the  template; I've also redacted the poster's e-mail address. If anyone understands what the poster is trying to convey, they're welcome to respond below. Deor (talk) 11:49, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: In the History section, we find bizarre technical sentences like "The Jemez Mountains are predominantly formed by the 18.7 Ma to ~50 ka Jemez volcanic field."  I don't know what that means, and I presume the average reader doesn't know, either.  It would be nice if the technical numbers ("18.7 Ma") were either properly explained or replaced by something more generally informative.  In any case, geologic information is not historical information, and perhaps the entire paragraph could be moved elsewhere. --Douglaspperkins (talk) 07:46, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted it all. Not only was it of questionable relevance there, it was also blatant plagiarism, a direct copy-and-paste from the abstract of the geology paper that it cited. For future reference, however, those numbers were ages in years: "Ma" is short for megaannus, or millions of years ago, while "ka" is short for kiloannus, or thousands of years ago. "~" means "approximately". --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 21:32, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bizarre technical details 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Los Alamos, New Mexico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715044836/http://nmfireinfo.wordpress.com/2011/07/03/investigators-determine-cause-of-las-conchas-fire/ to http://nmfireinfo.wordpress.com/2011/07/03/investigators-determine-cause-of-las-conchas-fire/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified