lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Landform

message: landform is a natural or anthropogenic[1][2] land feature on the solid surface of the Earth or other planetary body. Landforms together make up a given terrain, and their arrangement in the landscape is known as topography. Landforms include hills, mountains, canyons, and valleys, as well as shoreline features such as bays, peninsulas, and seas,[citation needed] including submerged features such as mid-ocean ridges, volcanoes, and the great ocean basins. 2405:204:A1A9:F918:0:0:DDE:10A0 (talk) 12:41, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography 

message: Üdv mindenkinek szép napot kívánok 2A02:AB88:7583:2400:F1AC:F565:C893:46A5 (talk) 21:23, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kopcsó Szabolcs 

message: Currently "natural formation" redirects here. That term sometimes is used to refer specifically to a landform that resembles something or otherwise invites a fanciful descriptor (such as Mitten Buttes). There is List of rock formations, but that list is not restricted to what I'm trying to describe. There's also the word mimetolith, but that seems too esoteric. Is there a better search term that I'm missing, or has this phenomenon just not been categorized? Richard K. Carson (talk) 00:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Natural formation" cf. pareidolia
Talk:Modena

message: A good next step would be to check "What links here" and work Wikilinks into the text, eh. Wetman 06:33, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Super Smash Bros. Melee/Archive 1

message: Falco is in fact a secret character in SSB:M based on Fox in SSB. No error, thus my revert. Andre (talk) 15:11, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
:Yup, but the phrasing was a little weird; I can see why Carlj7 seemed to get confused. I've tried rephrasing that sentence a little. --Sparky the Seventh Chaos 15:18, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)
Adam Marx Squared 00:48, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Falco 

message: Take a look at the table of Pokemon. The "Japanese Name" column shows one of three different meanings:
1) The name as it is pronounced in Japanese
2) The Japanese name translated into its English meaning
3) The English name 'Japanized,' if you will, eg Celebi = Serebi (although in the article it is translated as Cerebi)
Not only are most of 3) incorrect, it's really not the Japanese name. Therefore, that should leave either 1) or 2). But this is colossal inconsistency. One of the three needs to be named the standard and applied to all names in that column.Adam Marx Squared 19:40, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I would sooner get rid of the list entirely; it primarily takes up space, and isn't significantly relevant to the article at hand. Plus, the names are consistent with the corresponding Pokemon articles, where it's more relevent. Nifboy 21:30, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pokemon Japanese name inconsistencies
Wikipedia talk:Bureaucrats

message: The redirect User:Bureaucrat has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Vitaium (talk) 11:52, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:User:Bureaucrat]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: The redirect User:Bureaucrats has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Vitaium (talk) 11:53, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:User:Bureaucrats]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: As the most recent proposal for admin elections has attained consensus for a trial run, and it specifies that bureaucrats will manage the process, I invite any interested volunteers to participate at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections#Role of bureaucrats to manage process to work out details of bureaucrat involvement. isaacl (talk) 22:01, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adminstrator elections trial run
Talk:Himno Istmeño

message: The opening paragraph currently states that "It is recorded to have one of the world's most diplomatic lyrics." What the heck is this supposed to mean? Notmyrealname 03:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Diplomatic lyrics?

message: The name of the anthem isn't "Himno Istmeño". The "Himno Istmeño" was used firstly in the end of 19 century, but when Panama separates from Colombia in 1903, the panamanian goverment changed severally the old anthem but the new anthem hasn't a official name. So, this title of "Himno Istmeño" is false and must be changed to "National Anthem of Panama". Thanks! --Taichi (talk) 21:33, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Actuly from many sources "Himno Istmeño" is  the official name which translates to Isthmus Hymn and has to be changed backPhilpm930 (talk) 23:08, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake
Talk:Barbary dove

message: The normal English name (HBW and almost all other references I've seen) for "Streptopelia risoria" is Barbary Dove - anyone object if I do a re-name job on it? Also it seems pretty universally accepted now as derived from S. roseogrisea, not from S. decaocto = MPF 12:39, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - MPF 23:34, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: Up front this article suggests that this may be confused with other birds of similar names (other ring/ringneck doves) and has a disambuation page to help in this regard. That disambiguation page redirects back to the barbary dove. Counterproductive.
Lost on belmont (talk) 15:11, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation 

message: Came here to report on the disambiguation loop, but I see it's already been reported months ago.  I don't know the other uses and so I can't fix it. 71.139.170.74 (talk) 06:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seconded 

message: The paragraph that says doves "should" not be released because it's "inappropriate" is not written from a neutral point of view, and does not point to the specific sources of the statement but just says "see references".
71.139.170.74 (talk) 06:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: the barbary dove does not have any subspecies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.105.47 (talk) 00:32, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  No subspecies 

message: I saw my first pair of "ring neck pigeons" yesterday in Fresno CA.  Creamy mourning doves but bigger.   What's their habitat range? How does one tell one species from another?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:CFCE:1EE0:5108:3056:928A:58C7 (talk) 23:04, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where at?
Talk:Ugly Rumours (band)

message: The review is an important piece of History showing the character of the Prime-Minister of Great Britain, and shows the young parts of his behaviour that helped form the leader that he became.
What is the source for this review? Unless it is verifible, it should be cut from the article. Bmills 13:33, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It is an obvious spoof! Bmills you are quite right to point out the "found" - which is there signalling that it is a spoof. Removed from article. Pete/Pcb21 (talk) 15:21, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Now can we please leave it off the page! Bmills 15:23, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The thought of Tony Bliar doing Mick Jagger impressions on stage is mind boggling, and not an image I'm sure I want to dwell on...quercus robur 22:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mind boggling...

message: There are two quite separate bands being referred to here - both with the name Ugly Rumours. One is Tony Blair's band from university, the other is the parody band who have released an anti-war song this week. Surely we can't have them both in one page? Don't we need a second one for the new one? Tobycek 13:24, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Two bands, so two pages?
Talk:Soichiro Honda

message: The text of this article is for the most part copied verbatim from the site at the bottom, "viplife.com".  Being that there are some incorrect details as well as the the incorrect tone, this article would then need a complete rewrite...
210.174.42.46 (talk) 09:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism?

message: So, was he born in Hamamatsu, or Yamahigashi?  The article says both. 24.252.50.236 (talk) 07:14, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Birthplace

message: Part of this article claims he had 'no formal education' at age 15, but elsewhere there are stories about his days in school. Which is correct? Danohuiginn 15:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Education 

message: This article is just overall pretty crappy.  It needs a lot of work. 71.170.176.218 (talk) 05:24, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you know of any.. "mistakes" as you say, notable enough to be included to the biography please list them here. As for the article being a propaganda piece, not really, it's just crappy as the IP says above.  Dr. Loosmark  21:51, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

text: The obvious clue here is the Tokyo IP address responsible for the quoted content, suggesting a non-English first language speaker. The poster above's address is Honda Motors, Torrance, California. I was intending to change the image (for another not available to me at original upload time), but reading the content, Mr Honda's left eye as seen in the close-up does seem damaged, so I put the change on hold just for this reason alone.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 00:57, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality 

message: The text mentions that Soichiro damaged his left eye, but in the picture his right eye appears to be worse off.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.123.3.123 (talk) 20:51, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should the image be mirrored?
Talk:Louis XVIII

message: Change the tenure of king of France claimant to better show that he was the claimant march 20th to 8th July 1815 because of the War of the Seventh Coalition/Hundred Days. Just to make it more clear and to prevent confusion. 108.18.131.191 (talk) 00:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: . Heartmusic678 (talk) 12:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2022 

message: Proposal to add Louis XVIII's portrayal by English actor Ian McNeice in Napoleon (2023 film) as another notable mention in the Film and Television section Revarcline (talk) 04:13, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional Film Portrayal 

message: 71.162.137.96 (talk) 20:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 00:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 5 April 2024
Talk:Dalmatia

message: I've recently reverted a new user's change that removed the notion of Dalmatia being in Croatia from the top of the article (which would be glaring NPOV/UNDUE issue), while at the same it is a bit overcrowded there, esp. in combination with the hatnote. Suggestions welcome how to phrase it in a more concise manner. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 14:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  lead section region discussion
Talk:Nerve agent

message: Someone tried to add a detection section that is almost exclusively about one method used to detect nerve agents. WP:UNDUE says that "Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources..."  Given that there are many methods of detecting nerve agents, having a section labelled detection that is just about one of them gives a distorted and inaccurate view of the topic.  The section is shown below:-- Toddy1 (talk) 14:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detection section 

message: Can't see why anyone will have a problem with this but thought I'd play it safe. I renamed the "antidote" section to "treatment" - some of the drugs mentioneddo not act as antidote (ie "a remedy to counteract the effects of poison" MW) - atropine reduces the effect a nerve agent has on the body rather than counteracting the toxin. It also mentions two separate treatments, pralidoxime and atropine, noting that they may be administered together. Standard treatment for nerve agent poisoning is to administer both (eg army issue autoinjectors such as ATNAA and Mark I NAAK contain both of these drugs), to administer one on without the other is far less effective. Everything is cited so feel free to check it out. 
I also added Pyridostigmine bromide to the countermeasures in development section; it is preexisting so the section needed renamed, unsure of what is appropriate so just went with "Countermeasures". Alternatively can be split into two sections; maybe one on the development of nerve agent treatments as a whole. My knowledge of this stuff isn't huge so further additions may be beyond me! Comment if you have any issues/ideas!
Editor/123 17:22, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antidote to treatment 

message: Are nerve agents capitalized? FinnSoThin (talk) 00:48, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization?
Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Hephaestos

message: Deleted text from a sock puppet, who is obviously Lir:
:I have forwared the following comments to the FBI for investigation of criminal assault through use of interstate communication. Before you call the allegation silly, I suggest you read the federal statutes regarding assault
RickK 04:27, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: *I don't see why Jimbo referred Hephaestos to arbitration in the first place. As no one has brought up any problems with Hephaestos here, I propose this is removed from the Requests for arbitration page as no one appears to be requesting it. Angela. 23:44, Feb 23, 2004 (UTC)
**I agree with Angela's argument and reasoning. Metasquares 03:39, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Matter of Hephaestos 

message: Note: if four arbitrators have not voted to accept the case by 16:57, Feb 26, 2004, UTC, this case will be rejected.
*I vote we do not accept Matter of Hephaestos as no serious infraction of Wikipedia rules is alleged. He was simply contemplated as the plaintiff as in Hepaestos versus Wik which is being dealt with as Matter of Wik. Fred Bauder 13:29, Feb 24, 2004 (UTC)
*There is Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Hephaestos, but the issues addressed there do not appear to constitute a pattern of behavior, IMO, and were made during a perceived power vacuum. I do not accept hearing this case. --mav 08:15, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arbitrator opinions on accepting the matter of Hephaestos
Talk:Sif

message: I changed ". . . that she is know as "a prophetess . . ." to  ". . . that she is known as "a prophetess . . .".  I hope no one minds.  Finnbjorn (talk) 12:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Minor Edit to Correct Grammer

message: Didn't someone end up with a golden boar as a result of this story? Along with the ship, hair and spear, I could've sworn there's a boar...yee --Dante Alighieri 17:42, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Golden boar

message: Where did dark elves come from? I'm almost certain that it was the dwarves that made Sif's hair. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravenwing (talk • contribs) 02:30, 8 March 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Dark elves

message: Thor's name was spelled two different ways-- in standard English and non-standard English characters-- and Thrud and Odin were spelled only in non-standard characters. Whichever style is used, should be used consistently through the article, and as this is the English encyclopedia I think that standard English spellings should be used. Spelling "Th" with a Þ seems excessively pedantic and reader-unfriendly. I changed that and put the Norse spellings in parentheses for those who are curious. If someone feels strongly enough the other way and wants to change it, I won't have any heartburn, but I would suggest that the English spellings at least be mentioned in parentheses for the sake of readers who don't know what "Þórr" is. DCB4W 05:04, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stylistic Concern 

message: Sif, SIF, and Sif (disambiguation)
are three separate articles that would all be assigned the name of "Sif" independently. However only one can have the main page and I believe that it should be the TLA SIF, since the disambiguation can stay as Sif (disambiguation) and Sif can be moved to Sif (NorseMythology) or Sif (Norse mythology). Whichever article takes the page of Sif should also have SIF as a redirect so that there is no confusion when searching for either in the search bar. That is the main reason why I am proposing this move as it is very confusing to have two pages, "SIF" (TLA) and "Sif" (Norse God). -- Wiz9999 17:04, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sif location 

message: How is the name pronounced?--66.41.101.118 (talk) 19:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: [sɪv] Yngvadottir (talk) 18:08, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Pronounciation 
Talk:List of cartographers

message: While organising the page according to the century of birth (or failing that, century in which a notable work was created), I couldn't find any information on the following people. If you know of them, don't hesitate to add them again. - snoyes 17:43, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Preferably add persons with already created articles, but red-linked articles are allowed. Do not add people with an external link to their homepage. Thanks, feydey 14:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding names

message: We have a lot of non-overlap between this article page and the category cartographers (sorted by nationality mostly. Any thoughts how to fix this? is there a bot solution?--Natcase 12:22, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Consistency

message: The term CARTOGRAPHER means map maker and CARTOGRAPHY is map making.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.109.121.97 (talk) 11:17, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cartography 

message: The section Before 1400 has 17 entries currently.
About 7 entries are for cartographers who lived in the BCs.
Therefore, I propose to split this section into 3 sections (or sub-sections):
* BCE
* Before 1000 AD
* 1000 - 1400 AD
I request valuable opinions from informed Wikipedians. Sahrudayan (talk) 02:57, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split the section 'Before 1400' 

message: There was a German Cartographer called Herzog, who made some of the maps for the North Sea war theatre of First World War. These were published in the series "Der Krieg zur See 1914-1918 - Der Krieg in der Nordsee" (7 Volumes). In Volume I he and Ludwig von der Vecht (1854-1919) are named as the cartographers. Maybe since von der Vecht died during the work, Herzog took over the project. In the later volumes he is referred as "Vermessungsdirigent". Do you have any informations about him? (Surname, date of birth and dead, or maybe more)--Andreas (talk) 23:28, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kartograph Herzog
Talk:Altun Ha

message: :Worthwhile to include this picture, or redundant? –Hajor 18:23, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes – I noticed it was pretty much a duplicate of the other photo, so I thought I'd better ask. But I'm sure we'll find a good home for it on one of the other pages. Recent travels? It's only the Oaxaca pics that are recent, I'm afraid – we drove down there for a long weekend away last weekend. The ones from the far southwest are a couple of years older (unfortunately...), 35mm stuff I scanned in during a quiet moment yesterday. Saludos, –Hajor 14:06, 5 Feb 2004 (UTC)

text: Looks good. Thanks! –Hajor 00:49, 8 Feb 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There seems to be a bit too many images in the Gallery section relative to the article's content. I've added a main image representing Altun Ha and its main structure as the header for the article. The remaining photos in the gallery seem to be various angles and some seem to be a 'dumping ground' for one photographer's travel adventures (first 7 out of 10 images are all by User:Aquaimages. Although I am not for removing people's images, perhaps a better way to organize it would be to select a few representative shots, and move the rest to commons. -asmadeus 20:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On this topic, I added a more encompassing pan of the whole site at the bottom of the article. I'm not a super experienced wikipedian so someone might want to reformat that a bit --DinkY2K (talk) 06:17, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Contribution / Gallery 
Talk:Tortell

message: I just came upon this article, previously being unfamiliar with tortell. Here in New Orleans, Louisiana we have a traditional king cake throughout the Carnival season. I always hear that our version came over from France, but this description and photograph are MUCH closer to what we have in New Orleans than any French version I've seen. Interesting!  -- Infrogmation 18:43, 4 Feb 2004 (UTC)

message: The articles Tortell (linked to :ca:Tortell, :fr:Gâteau des rois and :oc:Corona dels reis), Bolo-rei (linked to pt:Bolo-rei), and Rosca de reyes (linked to :es:Roscón de Reyes) should be merged. Catalan tortell de reis, French gâteau des rois, Occitan corona dels reis, Portuguese bolo-rei, and Spanish roscón de reyes are doughnut-shaped king cake varieties that can be considered as a single category (unlike :fr:Galette des rois, which is a different king cake variety.) --Comedora (talk) 03:20, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Support the merge per Comedora's comments. --Maumivi (talk) 12:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: It's unclear what the target should be, as none of those pages seems primary. Is the idea to merge all to King cake? If so, that would need to be tagged/proposed on that page ... Klbrain (talk) 12:08, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Let's move the discussion over to the more general page at King cake (new target proposed). Klbrain (talk) 06:10, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Q Public License

message: I moved these from above the contents to clean up the page a little. Cheers, 188.100.145.206 (talk) 19:01, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Can anyone qualified for it confirm this, and hopefully correct this article? Haakon 14:07, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [moved paragraphs] 

message: The article as it currently reads (Jan 30 2012) often refers to Qt's current licensing as being GPL.
I believe this is an error, Qt's current licensing is *LGPL*. (LGPL being a bit different from GPL.)
Reference: http://qt.nokia.com/products/licensing
Not all references regarding GPL are wrong in the article, I think just the ones about Qt's current licensing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg ercolano (talk • contribs) 20:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qt current licensing (GPL vs LGPL) 

message: "The main difference between GPL and QPL is that QPL forces the software developer to provide the source code, if in any way it links with QPL'd code (a library for example), even if the QPL'd code is not distributed with the software developer's code. This was the main reason QPL was used for Qt instead of the GPL. This meant that any code that uses (i.e links with) Qt under the QPL license must distribute in the QPL license and provide the source code."
I can't make heads or tails out of that paragraph.  Can someone rewrite it in more user-friendly terms? 204.145.242.1 22:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obfuscation 

message: so can we post files to the commons under the QPL or not? Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 02:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  commons 

message: New Editor at work here, I was playing around with the links and trying to get the link to work out, didn't realize it would screw up the history like that lesson learned 96.231.97.155 (talk) 22:34, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorry Guys 