Talk:Concept art

message: Looks like some good new info has been added, but "so-and-so is the best" or "so-and-so is the most important" isn't right for an encyclopedia article. --- Mike 04:23, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Good changes being made... --- Mike 04:31, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, feel free to make changes too :) Wassermelone 19:47, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Getting closer 

message: I would suggest a better format for the artists links.
Link to their page through their real name (if able to track it down) and then include their moniker/alias after that. 
If you want to add information about the artist... make a wiki entry about em rather than putting it here. (I guess if theres enough information that it warrants it... Wassermelone 19:47, 6 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested changes 

message: Maybe the artists with their homepagelinks should be listed under "External link" unless it is an wikipedia link but im not so sure about the wikipedia standard .
:Before the prodder removed all the external links, this was definitely way too many external links on this article.  The rough standard is that we should only link to a few sites, preferrably none of them commercial, where the topic of the article is discussed or defined.  For a major article with substantive sections, it may be appropriate to have suitable external links to such sub-sections.  External links to individual artists are definitely inappropriate for this article.  If they are notable artists (see WP:BIO, with their own article, one such link is appropriate on their article.  GRBerry 01:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On the contrary, "concept art" is, and always has been, very much in service to industry.  Throughout history artists have, like anyone with a particular talent, sought to profit from their talent.  It's a natural impulse to use what you've got to your own advantage.  Artists sought patronage of Popes and Bishops, and now they seek patronage of Game Designers and Auto Makers.  You may be uncomfortable with that, but it remains true still the same.  76.111.80.228 (talk) 02:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links 

message: I just made some changes to try and take away some of the krufty, self contradicting portions. There was even a small portion about the background of conceptual art! Unfortunately, I've been trying to find some good articles/resources. It doesn't seem to really exist. This designation more or less seems to have organically materialized rather than having someone specific it can point to and say 'This person created concept art!' Any help would be... helpful.
Wassermelone  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.62.126.227 (talk) 20:22, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent Changes

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Concept art. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20140222001740/http://www.creativeskillset.org/uploads/pdf/asset_5283.pdf?4 to http://www.creativeskillset.org/uploads/pdf/asset_5283.pdf?4
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:25, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have added a citation needed tag to the last sentence of the first paragraph, which claims these two terms are differentiated but without evidence. Please help improve this article by adding citations, your relevant thoughts, or discussion on the matter. Thank you kindly. Informationageuser (talk) 07:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Concept art vs. Visual development art