lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:U.S. Route 70

message: To clarify, 70 originates/terminates in Atlantic, NC, not Atlantic Beach. Atlantic is a tiny fishing hamlet. Atlantic Beach is a condo-covered vacation destination. Due to the relative notariety of Atlantic Beach, compared to Atlantic, this is a common error. Atlantic and Atlantic Beach are about 40 miles or 1 hour of drive-time apart, and 70 never enters Atlantic Beach. Edogy 03:15, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Termini

message: Obviously the detailed history should go in the state articles. Here are some general notes. --NE2 15:26, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: History notes

message: This list is way too long.  It's called major cities because it should include only major cities.  The length of this list makes it useless.  Might as well look at a map.  Is there any standard on what a major city is? Deigo (talk) 14:05, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Cities 

message: Wikipedia can never have the credibility it deserves as a reference with stylistic inconsistencies such as calling the subject of an article "U.S. 70" in one paragraph, "US 70" in the next, and "US-70" in a third.  The styling of U.S. Highway articles is "U.S. Route X", and this should be used consistently, even though I realize that US is frequently used and considered acceptable in other articles.  Further, although "I-X" is certainly acceptable with regard to Interstates, it doesn't follow that "US-X" is equally acceptable.  This isn't something where inconsistency is understandable, such as "labour" and "colour" being used in articles about British topics and "labor" and "color" in writing about American ones, it seems to be about every writer/editor using his or her own preferences instead of attempting to be consistent and encyclopedic.  75.200.37.120 (talk) 01:41, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style 

message: Can anyone help me with any information on the original U.S. Route 180 in Arizona and New Mexico?  As far as I understand, it was replaced with U.S. Route 60, U.S. Route 70, the current U.S. Route 180, and New Mexico state routes 90, 152, and 180.
Thank you for your help.
Allen (talk) 21:45, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former U.S. Route 180 

message: The article states that US 70 was Lee Highway and US 11 was Dixie highway.  I'm sure it's the reverse, because US 11 south of Farragut to Chattanooga is known locally as Lee Highway.  Can anyone verify this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Synthpopalooza (talk • contribs) 02:37, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dixie Highway / Lee Highway
Talk:Populist leaders of Latin America in the 20th century

message: This needs a better title, but I don't know what it is.
Populist leaders of Latin America? Durova 17:22, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree with Pablo's comments.  The only reason I can see for this article's existence is to identify a theme of leftist, populist leaders in post-colonial Latin America that are not quite caudillos.  Anti-Americanism might also play a part.  Also, charismatic can describe anyone from the Hebrew King David to Mao Zedong.  It doesn't imply a cult, though personality cults are commonly attributed to charisma.  --Vector4F 20:21, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

text: I took the freedom to change the name because the old title charismatic leaders was incorrect and misleading: there was already an article charismatic leader that re-directs to the sociological concept of charismatic authority. Andries 09:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Levi Vega Martinez

message: Someone needs to add verifiable and reliable references establishing the notability of Levi Vega Martinez, or I will nominate the article for deletion. -- Dalbury(Talk) 03:12, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of digital camera brands

message: It would be better to divide the list into 1) Consumer brands, 2) Professional brands, and 3) Webcam brands.  A fourth category, digital camcorders that can take still shots can be included, but may be worthy of its own list.  Another possible sublisting is camera phones. Currently, users wouldn't know that JVC's models are actually digital camcorders, not ones that are marketed as digital cameras.
:I removed JVC. Digital camcorders should not be listed here. - Slo-mo 09:54, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that. What about hasselblad They make dslr's, no? -kingu
This is my first writing on Wikipédia and I noticed hasselblad was missing  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.73.123 (talk) 14:30, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Categorize?
Talk:U.S. Route 71

message: I moved most (almost all) of the section dealing with US 71 and I-49 to the Interstate 49 page.  Most of the information didn't deal directly with US 71, instead it dealt with I-540, Missouri 249, etc.  Rt66lt 22:05, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have moved this to U.S. Route 71, as that is the name used by AASHTO, the Federal government, and many states. See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject U.S. Highways#Useful resource - AASHTO reports 1989-present. If there are no complaints about this or the other three I have moved in a day or so, I will move the rest. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 03:21, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moved to U.S. Route 71

message: The information on US 71 in Texas is incorrect.  Both northbound and southbound lanes are in Texas from a point north of Texarkana to a point just south of the Red River, where the highway reenters Arkansas.
I have made corrections. US 71 20:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US 71 in Texas
Talk:U.S. Route 171

message: I have a lot of information but posted what I have to start. Anyone wishing to edit for clarity or join in please feel free to do so. Otr500 (talk) 13:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Might want to fix the junction list up a bit ;). Mitch32(Growing up with Wikipedia 1 edit at a time.) 13:19, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

text: Thanks--have a funeral to go to and have to get on it later. Otr500 (talk) 16:48, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start
Talk:Cal Poly Pomona Greek System

message: --Angr (t·c) 18:31, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result 

message: There was another afd, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cal Poly Pomona Greek System.  I've closed this discussion as a redirect to California State Polytechnic University, Pomona.  Friday (talk) 19:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afd again
Talk:Transport Workers Union of America

message: Looks like both articles were started by people unaware of the other.  I can do the merge.  This is to solicit comment pro and con. patsw 03:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Suggestion

message: It's all in the edit histories if you believe that something significant dropped out from the merge.  Someone might want to give the section on recent events an edit to summarize it down to what's going to have some permanent significance as opposed to reading like  a newspaper account of the past week. patsw 22:44, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Completed

message: Could someone add perhaps a chronology of things the TWU achieved?  For example, when did they win the 40-hr work week?  etc. Specific statements scattered throughout the article would be OK but a chronology would be ideal... --Bookgrrl 20:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Achievements
Talk:U.S. Route 371

message: The map shows the south end at I-49 exit 172 rather than exit 162. (There's also some sketchiness about whether it makes it to I-49, but as far as I know it is signed along LA 177, at least northbound.) --NE2 19:00, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it rather messily. --NE2 03:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Map issues
Talk:Firebird Foundation

message: There is a Firebird Foundation for Anthropological Research, which gives out grants to students investigating topics related to oral literature of societies whose culture and language are threatened. Perhaps it would be useful to create a disambiguation page? http://www.rnld.org/node/101  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.151.52.21 (talk) 18:38, 6 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no need for a disambiguation page until there are multiple articles covering topics with the same name. The foundation you mention sounds like it's not necessarily notable enough to warrant an article. — voidxor 04:16, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Firebird Foundation for Anthropological Research
Talk:Astra

message: * Astra (gun company of Spain), Spanish gun manufacturer 
* Astra Company, a British arms merchant
* Astra (music label), a music recording label known active in 1999 based on A Bao A Qu
* Astra Games Ltd, a British designer and manufacturer of amusement machines  
* The brand name of an Israel Aircraft Industries-manufactured business jet, now produced for Gulfstream Aerospace as the G100/G150.
If they're noteable, please write the article and put the entry back. Tedernst | talk 03:32, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed entries 

message: Astra is a beer brand.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.144.209.8 (talk) 19:37, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  add? 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Astra (comics) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 4#Astra (comics) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  64.229.88.43 (talk) 03:00, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Astra (comics)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:U.S. Route 72

message: Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mississippi_Highway_5 Mississippi State Highway 5 terminates at US-72 in Benton County, Mississippi. Major Intersections shows a short concurrency, and then the route continuing north.  However, the route was truncated in 1943. There is no signage on US-72 to indicate that MS-5 goes anywhere beyond that eastern junction in Benton County.  If someone can find any additional verification for this, and please correct the table. Editing tables is beyond my capabilities.  Thanks! 504roadtrips (talk) 15:11, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error regarding MS 5 concurrency on US-72 - Major Intersections
Talk:U.S. Route 73

message: I have a book on Route 66 with reprints of maps from the Automobile Club of Southern California (dated 1930) which shows US 73 through Vinita, Oklahoma and at the edge of the map says "to Muskogee".  The map is designed for US 66, so I don't know if it ended there.  It also shows US 73 East meeting Route 66 at Riverton, Kansas (this is now Alternate 69).  I didn't add it to the article since I do not have a terminus for the route.  If anybody knows, it should be added to the article.Rt66lt 20:33, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Oklahoma

message: I added this information from a Missouri road map (which has a large chunk of eastern Kansas with it) from 1933.  Rt66lt 18:55, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split route

message: Article is missing a junction list. Also: the route description is wholly unreferenced and most of the history appears to be unreferenced. – TMF 03:40, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassessment

message: Can anyone tell me where I can find information on U.S. Route 73's former route through Iowa?  I can't seem to find it.
Allen (talk) 04:46, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Iowa]] 

message: Apparently. according to a 1927 map of Texas, US 73 might have once entered the Lone Star State:  —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 08:22, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Texas
Talk:U.S. Route 74

message: Is there any considerations of an Interstate designation being added on this corridor west of (and/or concurrent with) I-74? Something along the lines of, say, I-36? CrazyC83 01:01, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At this time, US 74 is not being replaced nor speculated to become a new Interstate highway anytime soon. -WashuOtaku (talk) 03:14, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interstate possibility? 

message: Proposed to merge Independence Boulevard (Charlotte) into article as it is entirely part of US 74.
*Support as nom --Admrboltz (talk) 03:22, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Independence Boulevard (Charlotte)]] merger 

message: It is correct that US 74's signage is poor. But US 74 actually begins underneath a bridge on Interstate 75 at mile marker 24 in Cleveland, Tennessee. Exit 20 is where the US 64-74 Bypass begins, known as APD-40. After 74 begins under the bridge it goes downtown, splits up then goes under APD-40. After, US 74 runs together with US 64.
Slayer2448 (talk) 11:28, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you confirm that somehow?  I look on both Google Maps/Street View and Yahoo Maps and I cannot confirm other than where the bypass ends on I-75 (Heck, Google Maps thinks US 74 continues to Chattanooga).  I hate Tennessee's signage methods of hidden highways and such, it's insane. --WashuOtaku (talk) 14:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where US 74's western beginning is 

message: As of the end of 2018, this section is seriously out of date. Some of these have been completed, some are much further along, and I think some may have been abandoned (I'm not sure). Should that be noted in a note in the article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teikovo (talk • contribs) 23:52, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The way the "Future" section typically works is items listed eventually get rolled into the History section, typically rewritten, while new items are listed in the section. The issue is nobody doing it, regardless of reason, thus it stagnates. I get it, it is a lot easier to update the junction list than writing well thought-out paragraphs. --WashuOtaku (talk) 00:06, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Future" Section
Talk:Jesse Hepler Lilac Arboretum

message: Where is this arboretum? I haven't seen it on campus, and doing searches on the university website doesn't turn anything up. Google searches for it just come up with clones of the wikipedia article. Lilacs are awesome and I would have figured I'd run into a lilac arboretum on campus by now. Anyone have any info?
http://www.botanique.com/bincgi/detail.cfm?idnum=6107
I think it's in Spaulding.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.177.67.97 (talk) 06:09, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:U.S. Route 75

message: Suggest this section be moved to U.S. Route 75 in Texas once that article is created. ObtuseAngle 17:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Texas alignments 

message: This article has been reclassified C for WP: Oklahoma to conform with that for U.S. Roads. Bruin2 (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:Lucius Vorenus

message: Someone updated the legion of the historical Vorenus to being that of the 11th Legion - not the 13th - does anyone know where it says this in De Bello Gallico? - Beowulf314159 03:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: For an online version of the text see: For an online version of the text see http://www.forumromanum.org/literature/caesar/gallic_e5.html#44 but I didn't notice any legion mentioned by name. Valentinian T / C 23:08, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I've reverted two attempts to edit the article on the assumption that the names "Lucius Vorenus" and "Titus Pullo" are anglicisations, and the accurate Latin names are "L. Varenus" and "T. Pulfio". First, Latin praenomina have standard abbreviations, so "L." is always Lucius and "T." is always Titus. Secondly, the T. Rice Holmes edition of De Bello Gallico, which as far as I can tell is the standard accepted text (and is linked from the article), uses "Vorenus" and "Pullo" (and spells out the praenomina). "L. Varenus" and "T. Pulfio" are manuscript variants and are used in the 1869 MacDevitte translation, which is on the internet because it's out of copyright, but predates Rice Holmes's edition and would have to be considered outdated. More modern translations, like HBO and this article, use Rice Holmes's spelling of the names. --Nicknack009 (talk) 17:16, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, in common with all the literature, we use Julius Caesar and Pompey as per WP:COMMONNAME. --Nicknack009 (talk) 17:20, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names
Talk:A winner is You

message: I think this article should be kept. Leet and All your base are belong to us remain, so why not this?
* Leet isn't a phrase but a vernacular. "All your base" was a widespread net meme that was covered in major newspapers like the LA Times. I don't think this phrase is anywhere near as notable. | Klaw ¡digame! 03:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion
Talk:U.S. Route 76

message: I think the all articles about U.S. 76 through Tennessee, Georgia, and also South and North Carolina needs to be merged; also a page about Special routes of U.S. Route 76 shall be created. can someone do this plz thanks 2600:1700:6180:6290:8C03:D18F:5B92:9EEF (talk) 00:25, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @IP there are already junction lists for each of the states, so it's not necessary to compile anything. We can just combine the lists that already exist. –Fredddie™ 18:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge Request 

message: Thanks 2600:1700:6180:6290:8C03:D18F:5B92:9EEF (talk) 15:41, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @IP there are already junction lists for each of the states, so it's not necessary to compile anything. We can just combine the lists that already exist. –Fredddie™ 18:33, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other replies
Talk:Daniel Amos

message: I have added some tentative section headings to the article. I think they're pretty good but I'm far from certain they're as good as they can be. Feel free to suggest/make changes to "soup it up". In particular I think the Alarma boxset needs its own section but it's a bit weak right now..needs beefed up with another sentence or two. GBrady 06:02, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Added some to some sections. Also separated the HD and Darn Floor reissue talk at Larry Norman's request. Audiori (talk) 23:24, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sections 
Talk:Project Longshot

message: I added a note directly below the cited reference on this page calling attention to the fact that the article linked to contains incorrect nomenclature for the components in this star system, which might mislead the reader if they know anything about IAU nomenclature and the assigned names of stars in this constellation. I felt it was a benefit to Wikipedia users to note this, but it may require the use of proper markup. Radec (talk) 03:17, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note added 

message: Since Helium 3 is estimated to cost between $4bn and $5.6bn a ton according to several sources, that would mean that the fuel cost of the mission would be in the order of 1 to 1.5 trillion dollars. Maybe a plausability note is needed. 86.133.59.165 (talk) 16:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Plausability note? it's just fantasy-driven speculation. It's not even well informed speculation: the authors didn't know Alpha Centauri B from Beta Centauri. Qemist (talk) 12:56, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: 'Plausability' [sic] derives from the calculations. These appear to be correct. In addition the PDF discusses and discards several technologies which were judged implausible (for example, lasers for a powered light sail were only able to generate such power in pulses of short duration). Of necessity they do speculate about the level of technology available by the end of the life of the Space Station, but they attempt to put clear bounds on such 'fantasy'. As for the obvious errors, you're right that the supervisors should have picked that up. Beta Centauri is well known in NASA - they called one of their staging vehicles "Agena", after all. But on the whole I've seen a lot worse in PhD theses, never mind graduate papers, than Beta Centauri for Alpha Centauri B. The students were aware of the basic parameters of what they called a "trinary system" (they included a flyby of Proxima, and a visit to both A and B). 203.89.168.26 (talk) 12:31, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost of Fuel 

message: I think someone needs to include the year when this project was studied.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.242.211.37 (talk) 14:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Date

message: The linked pdf isn't available: 403 forbidden.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.5.21.42 (talk) 13:48, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hm, I just downloaded it ... --203.89.168.26 (talk) 10:33, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  pdf 403 forbidden 

message: I think the image currently in the article is poor and maybe should be removed or replaced. 31.18.248.254 (talk) 22:43, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That image was essentially traced from the images on pages 16 and 17.--Craigboy (talk) 17:52, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor image
Talk:The Mechanic (1972 film)

message: Moved. WhiteNight T | @ | C 05:40, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Result
Talk:U.S. Route 377

message: Since U.S. 377 only runs through two states, and the Oklahoma portion of it is multiplexed in its entirety with —and U.S. Route 377 in Oklahoma even redirects to Oklahoma State Highway 99, this article should be merged into its parent article, U.S. Route 377. Thoughts? Greggens (talk) 20:41, 4 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge [[U.S. Route 377 in Texas]] into this article?
Talk:U.S. Route 78

message: Where is the California Highway 78??--石 (talk) 06:15, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

message: When will the signage and designation of US 78 be completed 100% (adding US 78 shield signs to other routes to be completed) to be extended westward to northeast Arkansas? 23.150.248.194 (talk) 15:36, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Western Extension 

message: This route was extended to Arkansas according to us ends website (https://www.usends.com/78.html) and other websites that is already cited in this article, should the article be updated? 174.209.192.45 (talk) 14:11, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update The Article? 

message: Is Tennessee Highway 278 demolished? I’m not sure that SR 278 was demolished or not because of the rerouting of US 78. 69.1.59.248 (talk) 22:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  TN SR 278 Demolished? 

message: The article needed to be updated because US 78 is now signed in Arkansas (including the rerouting in Tennessee) according to https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=34216.msg2916462#msg2916462. 2402:8100:3972:14D8:7CD1:78DA:3DC9:634C (talk) 03:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  US 78 Now Signed
Talk:Daiyō kangoku

message: It would seem that someone more proficient than I in Japanese should translate at least a stub of this article to Japanese and place it on the jp.wikipedia. it is an important legal controversy there. ALC Washington 03:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation to Japanese 

message: This article is in nedd of in-line cites. Otherwise a reader is unsure of where each statement is sourced. SmithBlue (talk) 00:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Went back and looked at some of the sources, as well as the original author's text with parenthetical references. Tried to add in-line cites where it appeared they were supposed to go. 68.48.153.35 (talk) 23:30, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: In-line cites