Talk:Iowa Supreme Court

message: Hello people,
the table in the article contains lists of people who are currently serving in the iowa supreme court.
I think the links on the dates should be removed, since they lead to nowhere in particular. plus, the link of justice mansfield leads to a disambiguation where he is not one of the options. 
cleanup is required.
89.139.17.151 (talk) 12:12, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello again, registered to wikipedia and removed the links myself. maybe there isn't a smarter way to change the Justice mansfield thing. Drorzm (talk) 13:58, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I created a redlink to Edward Mansfield (judge) and have also added that to the disambig page. Cheers! bd2412 T 14:33, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  links in the names of Iowa supreme court justices names 

message: I've removed Nelson v. Knight from the list of notable cases. It's attracted national attention, yes, but it's a simple workplace claim and seems out of place with the other cases listed. The description was also grossly inaccurate--the summary mentioned "sexual harassment", despite the plaintiff specifically claiming sexual discrimination only, not harassment. Mackensen (talk) 21:57, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Given the inclusion of a Template:Incomplete_list, I would argue that any case that generates coverage with national news coverage and single-focus articles in a legal journal is, to some degree, notable. In this particular, it was added after it was mentioned on the page of Edward Mansfield (judge), where it provoked enough interest in order to question why it was not included. Perhaps a greater discussion of the purpose of having such a list is warranted, given that the list is currently split between three modern and three (extremely) historic cases. I would contend that until such a list is complete enough to warrant categorization or overviews by topic, it is relevant. More cases should be added to the list, by all means, particularly if within the century-wide gap of case history.Pauseforfermata (talk) 04:05, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nelson v. Knight 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Iowa Supreme Court. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100528122502/http://www.iowacourts.gov/Public_Information/Iowa_Courts_History/Early_History/ to http://www.iowacourts.gov/Public_Information/Iowa_Courts_History/Early_History/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090617051409/http://www.iowacourts.gov/Supreme_Court/ to http://www.iowacourts.gov/Supreme_Court/
*Added  tag to http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20110114/NEWS/101140351
*Added  tag to http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20110401/NEWS/104010361/Cady-will-continue-chief-justice
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060505082508/http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Public_Information/Iowa_Courts_History/Civil_Rights/ to http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Public_Information/Iowa_Courts_History/Civil_Rights/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:22, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This page used to reside at Iowa Supreme Court, and that appears to be its common name. For example, on the court's own web page, it consistently calls itself the " Iowa Supreme Court"; never the "Supreme Court of Iowa".
The article was was at the name Iowa Supreme Court from its creation in 2004 until a couple years year ago, when it was moved in December 2017, without prior discussion as far as I can tell, to its present name (by a now-blocked editor, so I won't bother pinging; although to be clear, there's no indication that the block had anything to do with moves like this) with the rationale "Like the other articles of this type".
Before making a formal Requested Move, I thought I'd bring it up here: I think it should be moved back to its actual common name; consistency with other articles is less important than accuracy.
In case you're wondering, there's no official name that might provide guidance here. The court's official name comes from Article V, Section 2 of the Iowa constitution, where it is simply the "Supreme court". TJRC (talk) 22:55, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Iowa Supreme Court" 

message: This article needs a section on judicial selection in Iowa and in particular the role of the State Judicial Nominating Commission, noting the changes in 2019 and the resulting controversy and lawsuit. Iowalaw2 (talk) 23:22, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judicial selection