Talk:Exorcist II: The Heretic

message: There are quite a few people who defend this film (see, eg. ), and in particular people who think it was the best of the three follow-up films.  The cinematography and sound-track, in particular, are mostly well-thought of, even by the film's detractors.   The film maybe deserves a section outlining the initial reaction, and considered reaction to the film. ---- Charles Stewart 16:55, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree about the NPOV, though I dont really think any one is "favoring" the movie here. Its just that the article is too long and too detailed for an encyclopedia. I do appreciate whoever took the time to write all this, its just too much information, at least in the summary. ShirleyPartridge (talk) 09:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Evaluating E2

message: :Image:Exorcist2poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair use added. SkierRMH 07:25, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Exorcist2poster.jpg

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Exorcist II: The Heretic. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081227143039/http://filmfreakcentral.net/notes/jboormaninterview.htm to http://filmfreakcentral.net/notes/jboormaninterview.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:07, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: 57 minutes into Time After Time (1979 film) there is a billboard for Ghirardelli Square advertising Exorcist IV. The film debuted 28 September 1979 but Wells travels into the future by 5 November 1979.
Exorcist III didn't come out until 17 August 1990 so I take it that sequels to 1977's Heretic (presumably the 3rd in 1978) was some sort of humor? 184.145.18.191 (talk) 00:17, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Sequels