lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dalek

message: From WP:USERG: . If you want to discuss the TARDIS Data Core wiki, you can bring it up at WT:WHO. DonQuixote (talk) 18:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  WP:USERG 

message: It seems a little weird that there are lists of licensed and other appearances and parodies and all, but no list of actual appearances in the show, perhaps marking which ones are Dalek-centric stories (The Daleks, Genesis of the Daleks, etc.) and which are cameos or incidental appearances (like the dead one in The Space Museum, or when all the Doctor's enemies arrive in The Pandorica Opens)
2601:1C2:5000:1472:BC41:413C:8064:C97E (talk) 09:03, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The list is sort of present in the fictional history section but there is a navbox at the bottom (not visible in mobile view unfortunately) to all the TV appearances. GraemeLeggett (talk) 11:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obvious missing thing 

message: I was looking at the Non-Doctor Who Cameo appearances section, and found a lack of the time when a Dalek read out a question on The Big Fat Anniversary Quiz, shown on Channel 4 on the 2nd January 2015. Should we include this, becuase I think we should. WikiFan2456 (talk) 19:22, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Big Fat Anniversary Quiz 

message: The redirect Metaltron has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.   Jay 💬 08:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Metaltron]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Christian IX of Denmark

message: The 1852 Treaty of London calls him "His Highness Prince Christian of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg" (The Times (London), Monday June 21, 1852, p. 5). DrKay (talk) 09:57, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious 

message: In the article, his wife is called his second cousin and double second cousin. So I matched up their grandparents and aha! They were second cousins one way and half-second cousins another way. For those keeping score at home. 74.104.189.176 (talk) 22:37, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  second what again? 

message: Where are all of the title & style sections going? This is highly irresponsible. The royalty entries of Wikipedia are VERY POORLY edited. JasonKurth (talk) 20:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titles and Style 

message: (non-automated message) Greetings! I have opened an RfC on WT:ROYALTY that may be of interest to users following this article talk page! You are encouraged to contribute to this discussion here! Hurricane Andrew (444) 19:30, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  RfC of interest 
Talk:Neo-evangelicalism/Archive 1

message: Wasn't the key feature of neo-evangelicalism a lower view of Scripture than that which had been held by historical fundamentalists and evangelicals? For instance, when someone still held to the infallibility of Scripture in matters of faith and doctrine, but not the inerrancy of Scripture, including statements of fact that were outside the areas of faith and dotrine, wasn't that person then labeled a neo-evangelical? Of course, as with many (most?) category labels, other things came to be associated with the label neo-evangelical, as this article points out, but my own sense is that the historical key was one's view of Scripture. My understanding is that Evangelicals and Fundamentalists today essentially share the same high view of Scripture, but differ in matters of degrees of separation and how separation is defined, and also differ on some social requirements which came to be associated with the label Fundamentalist. Also, I am not sure that the label Neo-Evangelicalism really came into wide usage as early as this article states. My own sense from my theological training and personal observations is that Neo-Evangelicalism was a phenomenon which was more salient beginning in the early 1960's.  Is there documented evidence that supports widespread usage of the term Neo-Evanglicalism as early as the 1920's?  wleman 02:42, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that the term was used that early; but, the article doesn't say that it was.  The date that is usually used for the birth of the term is 1947, and it is attributed most often to Harold Ockenga.  However, the movement distinguished from come-outer fundamentalism is older and well-defined prior to the coining of the term.  Mkmcconn — 19:45, 14 Apr 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: key feature

message: The section on criticisms mentions that the movement has critics but does not explain what their specific criticisms are. It needs to be expanded, citing specific critisms of the movement. Also I removed the following paragraph as it expresses a POV and thus does not conform to the NPOV standard:
"In light of tectonic changes in the meaning and application of the term "evangelicalism" over the past half-century and particularly in light of developments within the last decade in which classic liberalism has sought legitimacy by using the monikers of "evangelicalism" it remains an incumbent task of conservative evangelicals to redefine their identity lest it cease to offer a clear and compelling witness to the Word of God in the world He created." 
If someone wants this information to be included it should be rewritten to attribute it to someone within the Neo-evangelicalism movement who has previously expressed this point of view. 
--Cab88 15:37, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV issues

message: *Generally reformated - addressed issues of wordiness - see it as making it more accesibly. 
*Question of the present and impact of neo conservsatism given section stub 
Paul foord 15:17, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  This was too dense with some POV issues-Major edit done
Talk:Teton County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:04, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Teton County has the highest per capita income of any county in the US. It also has the highest income disparity. There's a relatively new book that talks about these features of the county, reviewed here: https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/11/the-forest-for-the-trees-billionaires-in-the-wilderness/ . The book is also reviewed in many other places. With all of that, I wonder if these facts about the county could or should be mentioned in the intro section (its affluence). There is a section about it deep down in. Novellasyes (talk) 18:11, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Affluence
Talk:Sublette County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:07, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This poor dog is very malnourished and it looks like it was tied up and broke loose. This is on the road to Elkol just south oh mile marker 33. The dog is very weak. We stop to see if we could get it but it went pass the cattle prod where the sheet are and it is private land . Can you will call me 801.550.5381 2607:FB91:734:9851:C4BE:E032:716D:9ADF (talk) 18:53, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abandon Dog
Talk:Park County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:09, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't yellowstone national park in this county? Someone with some Wyoming background ought to mention this in the article (I don't know if bits of it are in other counties as well) 128.196.125.13 21:46, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yellowstone exists as its own government entity - I'm pretty sure the official county boundaries stop at the park - most maps show it that way ( for example, see the "License Plate" section at the bottom).  The image that Wikipedia uses for the county map is misleading, at best.  - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 23:33, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shouldn't someone mention [[Yellowstone]] since it's in this county?
Talk:Natrona County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:10, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What famous people are from Natrona County? GeoYeeter (talk) 17:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous people
Talk:Lincoln County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:12, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Laramie County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:12, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Johnson County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:13, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hot Springs County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:14, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Goshen County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:15, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Fremont County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:16, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Crook County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:17, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Converse County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:17, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Carbon County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:18, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Campbell County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The WikiProject U.S. Counties standards might help.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:19, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this still A booming city? I did some flooring work out there and wan't to return.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.180.137.117 (talk) 19:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: curious also
Talk:Albany County, Wyoming

message: Wondering how to edit this U.S. County Entry?
The Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. counties standards might help.-— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ram-Man (talk • contribs) 15:20, 27 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roentgenium

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Roentogenium. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Roentogenium" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rogentium. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Rogentium" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Uninunium. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Uninunium" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Miranda (programming language)

message: There's no source listed for the claim that Turner considers Miranda "dead," and that sentence was submitted anonymously (although apparently by someone who knows a lot about Turner).  Can anyone cite a reference on this?
Beinsane 07:08, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: no source listed for the claim that Turner considers Miranda "dead,"

message: > || The infinite list of all prime numbers, by the sieve of Eratosthenes.
Is there any reason why he drops out of the comment, only to immediately start a new one?--80.135.92.95 21:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That piece of code is using Miranda's literate script mode: every line _not starting_ with ">" is a comment. The confusing part is that the author starts the above comment with ">" (which would indicate it's actually code!), but then proceeds to write an "||", which indicates it's a comment after all. There, I answered your question after only 4 years! 201.231.81.53 (talk) 00:44, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quirk 

message: The lead begins "Miranda is a non-strict..." where "non-strict" forwards to the lazy evaluation page. This doesn't seem correct as there are many non-strict languages that aren't lazy. I haven't touched anything though as I'm not sure what the edit should be. --91.231.145.253 (talk) 09:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change to Introduction 

message: This article looks like an introduction to Haskell - the syntax is strikingly similar. Are there aspects and features of Miranda that are different and have not found their way into Haskell? --Cebus (talk) 07:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comparison to Haskell 

message: Re "difference between the of the child nodes is not higher than 1 " should that be "difference between the child nodes is not higher than 1"? ϢereSpielChequers 15:00, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  query
Talk:Street basketball

message: Maybe not TO, but at least WITH streetball. Just look at the descriptions. They're too similar to be two different articles, and they're the same, just with different names. I'm sure it's real confusing for people to see two different articles about playground basketball.
I agree, I should be merged. They are esencially the same thing.
Canastad3 12:19, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  It should be merged
Talk:Tourin

message: Why is the "T" in "Le Tourin" capitalized? Badagnani (talk) 02:46, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization 
Talk:Annual Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank Group

message: would be good to have a list, separate entries for each conference, even.
This is not incorrectly pluralized; one event is the "annual meetings", not "annual meeting".
----
If they are "officially known as the Annual Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank Group", then why isn't the name of this entry "Annual Meetings of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank Group"? - dcljr 19:02, 9 Jul 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tiffani Thiessen

message: the filmography section needs to be changed. it looks awful with all the wiki links and dates, and (film) (made for tv) link, too.
i did move a couple of dates to the end of the line, as i assume that's when she played the character (see bev hills line to see what i mean) because before this, it's just - bev hills (date) (tv) (date) (character) - it doesn't explain what the dates are! it also makes it a tad unreadable.
to be honest, the dates after each tv show is not needed as it's given on that shows page. the dates she was in each show should be the preferred date, as funnily enough, that's what relates to Tiffani...
also, the wiki links for each year is a bit much. this is nothing but a section of wiki links and it looks bad to read (just my opinion).
i may change it myself in the near future, but thought i'd inform first, to save having it reverted or stepping on anyone's toes. 194.221.133.226 11:16, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea about her personal life I'd like to know if this comment is accurate or just been worded terribly.
"During her Saved By The Bell and Beverly Hills, 90210 career she dated her co-stars Mark Paul Gosselaar and actor Brian Austin Green for about 7 years."
That implies she dated both men at the same time for 7 years, I honestly can't believ that's the case, it sounds more likely that she dated both of them at some point during those 7 years.
Could someone clear it up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tidus mi2 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Filmography 

message: Can't you guys get a better photo of the beautiful Tiffani Thiessen, please, please, please!!!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.149.113.200 (talk) 09:54, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Better Photo, please!!!

message: Ethnic pronounciation of her family name is "TEE-senn". For the international anglo reader, how is the name of that woman pronounced in the U.S. where she lives and of which she is a citizen?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:46:1A05:2130:20C5:DFBD:28E7:7ECF (talk) 23:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  pronounciation
Talk:Trempealeau County, Wisconsin

message: As a resident of Trempealeau County and a Historian, I find the statement concerning native americans burning down trees to make room for berries and "doing little" to cultivate the land before there "removal" very inflammatory in nature. The citation is vague and appears to be taken from a outdated text's introduction. Even if this is a factual statement, it should be altered in such a way that the racial overtones are removed. 
Thank you much  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.28.185.245 (talk) 15:54, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate, Inflammatory language 

message: According to the article, the name of the Trempealeau River is taken from a French phrase, "La Montagne qui trempe à l’eau", which is supposed to mean "Mountain with its foot in the water".  Actually, trempé à l'eau means "quenched with water", while "foot in the water" would be la pied dans l'eau".  Did someone make a joke when they created this page 8-9 years ago?  --- Couillaud 03:14, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've modified the gloss based on two sources I've added. Doremo (talk) 03:34, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Trempe a l'eau" mistranslated
Talk:Taylor County, Wisconsin

message: I've removed some ten-year-old claims that virtually all the settlers in 1875 were Yankees from New England. The sources cited don't support the claim, and the 1880 census actually refutes it. According to H.O. Ruesch in his Taylor County Historical Sketch, here are the first four settlers:
Settler      	Birthplace from 1880 census	When settled
E.L. Urquhart	Canada                     	Cruised timber and settled near Medford in 1870.
A.E. Harder  	Can't find him in census   	First permanent settler, in Medford 1872.
Pat Mullaloy 	Ireland                    	Settled 1873
C.W. Norton  	Can't find him in census   	Settled 1873
So of the two first settlers I can find, zero were Yankees. That's far from "virtually all."  If someone has a source that supports "virtually all," please provide it and consider restoring what I deleted.  -- Jeff the quiet (talk) 04:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced Yankee boosterism
Talk:Lucia Pamela

message: I deleted the hyperlink at the bottom which claimed to link to a documentary about Pamela's life, but actually just takes you to a strange web page about clarinets.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheldon W. Helms (talk • contribs) 19:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to Documentary

message: That coloring book sure is kooky. — Preceding unsigned comment added by David depaoli (talk • contribs) 02:25, 28 September 2002 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If you must put notes down (such as "write more about her coloring book") put them in the Talk page, here - not in the article! - DavidWBrooks 21:41, 28 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't put notes in the article 

message: I couldn't find her listed in the main "Recipients of the Medal of Honor" page in Wikipedia. This sounds bogus on the face of it. Where did this information come from?
: Good question. I've removed it - she's not listed here http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/moh1.htm. - DavidWBrooks 11:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Medal of Honor??
Talk:Aldhelm

message: This guy's in this category for some reason, even though his article says nothing about him being involved with mathematics. Am I missing something? Archimaredes on a train (talk) 12:10, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:Benedictine mathematicians? 

message: Under Contemporary Reputation, what does this mean? "Each of them is a complete picture?"  A picture of what?
100.15.138.239 (talk) 16:17, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  say what? 
Talk:Elmstead, London

message: There are three Elmsteads in Tendring,Essex (Elmstead Row, Elmstead Heath and Elmstead Market).  There is also a parish named Elmstead.  Is a Disambiguation page called for?Bebofpenge (talk) 05:59, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Given this is really just a part of Chislehurst, maybe it would make more sense to merge this article into that one?  ClareTheSharer (talk) 18:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation?

message: Clearing this up:
*Elmstead is the locality in London
*Elmstead Wood is the woodland within in
*Elmstead Woods is the name chosen for the railway station
These seem to have been used interchangeably up until now. MRSC (talk) 08:55, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Goodmayes

message: "Established 90 years". From when? We don't know when this was written. Please put the year of establishment  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.232.34.78 (talk) 17:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scouts 

message: Fndnd 92.233.31.119 (talk) 14:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Didiek
Talk:Greenford

message: This section is invisible, though there is markup; someone must know how to fix it. Rothorpe (talk) 13:02, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nearest places 
Talk:Gunnersbury

message: This page needs some work which I intend to do shortly. The area of "Gunnersbury" derives its name entirely from the park and this page should reflect that, rather than mentioning it only in the context of the school. Peter Maggs 14:43, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks anon - it would help if you signed your posts! Peter Maggs 17:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The page is about an 'area' or 'place'. This is not clearly defined. The map shows a point, rather than a coverage. Is this supposed to be about the Gunnersbury Ward? If so, then this includes part of the TW8 postal code, as well as W5. DavidFarmbrough 23:37, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's included?