lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2002 NHL entry draft

message: :I glanced over at the other languages, and the French Wikipedia seems to have the full first 9 rounds covered. Anyone willing to try and copy their info is welcome to. Otherwise, you can get the info from The NHL's website and work from there. It still lacks notes on traded/acquired picks and what not though. KirkCliff2 (talk) 17:48, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: How to complete the list

message: Can anyone explain why there are 33 picks listed for the second round,  or is this an error? Dolovis (talk) 16:20, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 33 picks in the 2nd round?

message: *Marcus Jonasen - 1
*Marek Chvatal - 1
*Jonas Fiedler (wikidata:Q8428079) - 1
*Jesse Lane - 3
*Alexander Kozhevnikov (ice hockey, born 1984) - 1
*Jakub Hulva - 1
*Yuri Artyomenkov - 1
*Petr Dvorak (wikidata:Q11815943) - 1
*David Turon (wikidata:Q1176917) - 1
*Jan Kubista (ice hockey) - 1
*Johan Berggren - 1
*Emanuel Peter (wikidata:Q1334741) - 2
*Tom Walsh (ice hockey) (wikidata:Q2440190) - 1
*Karri Akkanen (wikidata:Q16159926) - 1
*Maxim Shchevyev - 1
*Marian Havel (wikidata:Q3291213) - 1
*Alexei Stonkus - 1
*Mikael Vuorio (wikidata:Q11882655) - 1
*Niklas Eckerblom - 1
*Joni Lindlof (wikidata:Q2371059) - 1
*Tuomas Mikkonen (wikidata:Q1325225) - 1
*Sergei Shemetov (ice hockey) - 1
*Martin Cizek (ice hockey) (wikidata:Q27075289) - 1
*Thomas Nussli (wikidata:Q2426362) - 2
*Per Braxenholm (wikidata:Q2069939) - 2
Note: Articles must also meet WP:GNG. --75.88.89.194 (talk) 07:28, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  These redlinked draft picks meet [[WP:NHOCKEY]] 
Talk:2003 NHL entry draft

message: There is no mention in the article of what the yellow-colored boxes for some players names means.
71.234.131.146 (talk) 17:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. They appear to designate "star" players, but there's no rhyme, reason, or consistency to them (Why Shea Weber and not Marc-Andre Fleury in this draft? Why Duncan Keith and not Cam Ward in the 2002 draft?). There either needs to be a stated criteria for them, applied consistently, or they should be removed outright.Habfan29 (talk) 16:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colored names? 

message: *Patrik Valcak (wikidata:Q2058119) - 1
*Alexander Naurov - 1
*Randall Gelech (wikidata:Q2130596) - 2
*Alexander Hult - 1
*Vladimir Kutny (wikidata:Q12778638) - 1
*Niko Vainio (wikidata:Q1218066) - 1
*Loic Burkhalter (wikidata:Q1550375) - 2
Note: Articles must also meet WP:GNG. --75.88.89.194 (talk) 07:42, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  These redlinked draft picks meet [[WP:NHOCKEY]] 
Talk:2005 NHL entry draft

message: Someone should fix the scouting rankings. They have obviously been vandalized. AEJ 19:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I got it fixed now. AEJ 19:53, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 

message: Why are some highlighted in yellow? It states no reason for this.
Marcus1060 (talk) 11:05, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yellow 

message: *Nathan Davis (ice hockey) (wikidata:Q3336711) - 6
*Tim Kunes (wikidata:Q28974223) - 3
Note: Articles must also meet WP:GNG. --75.88.89.194 (talk) 07:58, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  These redlinked draft picks meet [[WP:NHOCKEY]] 
Talk:2004 NHL entry draft

message: Why are some of the players highlighted in gold???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.149.163.110 (talk) 21:31, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

message: *Kyle Wharton (wikidata:Q19288562) - 1
*Roman Tomanek (wikidata:Q3440906) - 1
*Peter Guggisberg (wikidata:Q680540) - 6
*Sergei Kukushkin (wikidata:Q463571) - 1
*Jonas Fiedler (wikidata:Q8428079) - 1
*Jan Steber (wikidata:Q11719680) - 1
*Valtteri Tenkanen (wikidata:Q11900309) - 1
Note: Articles must also meet WP:GNG. --75.88.89.194 (talk) 07:54, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  These redlinked draft picks meet [[WP:NHOCKEY]] 

message: I think USA Today is wrong about the conditions of the conditional 4th round pick in the June 2003 Markov/Tanabe trade. This June 16, 2004 article on the Hurricanes website says the following: “One of Carolina’s fourth-round picks includes an option for the Hurricanes to use Phoenix’s third-round pick in either 2005 or 2006 rather than Phoenix’s fourth-round pick this year as a part of the June 21, 2003, trade that sent David Tanabe and Igor Knyanev to the Coyotes in exchange for Danny Markov.“ If USA Today were right it would require Phoenix to acquire the pick twice on the same day in order to finally end up trading it to the Rangers. --67.141.251.90 (talk) 17:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pick 80 
Talk:Owen Nolan

message: Because he was born in Northern Ireland, doesn't that make him British as well as Canadian? 67.188.172.165 04:58, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes but he competes internationally for Canada.  He's already categorised a northern irish ice hockey player and a person from belfast.  What else to you propose?  Kevlar67 18:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality
Talk:Blair Atcheynum

message: Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?
Jamarredhead (talk) 20:20, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reflection on Blair Atcheynum Article 
Talk:Multnomah Falls

message: Since it is clearly not the second tallest waterfall in the US, I'm unclear if the person that rewrote this article believes it is ok to perpetuate misinformation as long as it is backed up by a government brochure ? - Marshman 18:02, 9 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The claim is that it's the second tallest year-round waterfall. But is that correct?  I dunno. Wahkeenah 18:39, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

text: Feel free to clarify. I'm not in a writin' mood right now. Wahkeenah 02:26, 10 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Tallest? 

message: Here is an orphaned free image: :Image:Multnomah Falls.jpg. --Strangerer (Talk) 23:31, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unused GFDL image

message: The article could be improved with expanded content about the construction of the Benson Bridge and information about the depth of the cascade pools. -- Deborahjay (talk) 18:16, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional content, please 
Talk:Bone Thugs-n-Harmony

message: More than once the founding date in the article has been changed from 1991 to 1992. One of the sources for the 1991 date is the group's own official website; the second source had been their official Twitter account, but I replaced that with an article at Mlive.com (the website of a group of Michigan newspapers). I could not find a reliable source for the founding of the group having taken place in 1992 rather than 1991, though there were sites such as TVTropes and a ticket-sales site which listed the 1992 date. Without a reliable source stating otherwise, the 1991 founding date should remain in the article.
*
*
—GrammarFascist contribstalk 16:13, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding date 1991 or 1992 
Talk:R. Tudur Jones

message: Is there a reliable source that confirms that he studied there? If so, please add details so that he can be included on List of people associated with Jesus College, Oxford. Thanks, BencherliteTalk 23:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know, but Jesus College has had a history of distinguished Welsh students.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.95.30.227 (talk) 23:03, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I know that, but he would need a proper reference to be included on the List (which I forgot to wikilink earlier). BencherliteTalk 10:24, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He didn't actully attend Jesus College but he was offered a scholarship to attend, notice the sentance that follows - "His father, however, insisted that he attend the University of Wales. " Rhys  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhys Llwyd (talk • contribs) 21:21, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough, but later it says: "Then he left Bangor for Oxford where he researched for his DPhil."  In fact, Rhys, you added it. Your source was...? BencherliteTalk 21:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah! Ok. He did attend Oxford (but not Jesus College though, he attended the congregationalist's college called Mansfield) for his D. Phil be he turned down the chance to do his BA there. My sources, erm, how about that i've read his Oxford D.Phil thesis and that I'm the R. Tudur Jones research scholarship holder at Bangor University's Theology Department, until my work is published you'll have to take my word for it! But seriously, I'm sure it's commented either in D. Densil Morgans chapter about R. Tudur Jones in his book 'Cedyrn Canrif' (2001) or Robert Pope's chpter about him in his book 'Codi Muriau Dinas Duw' (2005). Perhaps it's noted as well in the newly published Gwyddioniadur Cymreig, i have no copy at hand to look. - Rhys http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rhys_Llwyd  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhys Llwyd (talk • contribs) 21:47, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine - you've seen offline sources that confirm the college he attended was Mansfield, not Jesus, so I've changed the article and its categories accordingly. Thanks for clearing this one up for me! BencherliteTalk 22:27, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jesus College, Oxford 
Talk:DBA (airline)

message: Perhaps this article should redirect to DBA, which has a link to Deutsche BA -- Wgsimon 04:58, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Sennecaster  (What now?) 16:04, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Crawford v. Washington

message: Re the assertion "The decision thus has had the practical effect of reducing the impact of domestic violence prosecution units, such as ...., as well as increasing pressures on domestic abuse victims from state authorities.[2]". This is a very strong assertion, yet the only reference is to essentially one panel discussion involving non-neutral participants. Either we need better references or the assertion needs to be made quite a bit weaker. Rahul (talk) 18:33, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strong assertions needs strong references 
Talk:Codex Ephraemi Rescriptus

message: Here, by Peter M.  !
Budelberger (   ) 03:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  A rather rude review… 

message: The present text frames the fact that the CER doesn't contain 2 Thessalonians and 2 John as an accident by saying these epistles were 'lost' and this makes the manuscript 'not intact'. However, do we have evidence to suggest that they should have been in there, or could it also be that they were excluded on purpose because they were not considered canonical? If we don't know, then we shouldn't phrase the information as if we do. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 04:36, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: McDonald 2017 says the following: "Later, the palimpsest codex Ephraemi Rescriptus (C 04, ca. fifth century) reportedly included all of the NT books, but it is not certain that it includes 2 John and 2 Thessalonians." Now it would be interesting to know which document the "reportedly" refers to; perhaps it is the CER itself, which wouldn't tell us anything, because the author may have had the opinion that these two epistles did not belong in the canon, and therefore 25 books were 'all of the NT books' in his opinion. I'll see if I can get more evidence. It looks like scholars do not agree whether they got lost or were excluded. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 04:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Gallagher 2017 asserts 2 John was 'surely' and 2 Thessalonians 'probably' originally part of the CER. Interesting. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 04:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If the codex provided a table of contents listing which books it contained, or how many, that could settle the question pretty easily. The Muratorian fragment's beginning was lost, but it indicates the third gospel was Luke and the fourth John, so it is reasonable to infer from the text itself that there were four gospels in total and the first two were Matthew and Mark. Do we have any such evidence within the CER indicating there should have been a 2 Thessalonians and 2 John? Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 05:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 Thessalonians & 2 John: 'lost' or 'excluded'?
Talk:Scilla

message: In case anyone is wondering, I decided that a significant plant genus trumps an uncommon spelling in Greek mythology, and should therefore "own" the name. Stan 05:30, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: April 2005

message: "...an ingredient in cough medicines and cardiac surgery."
How is it used as an ingredient in cardiac surgery?
Russia Moore 05:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification? 

message: I was actually interested in the obscure Greek reference.  (Plutarch, Life of Pericles).  The squill, or sea onion, he is referring to should be Drimia maritime. It is still a member of the family asparagaceae, but the Genus and Subfamily are entirely different.  Helen Cozart   209.55.94.154 (talk) 19:55, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: November 2012

message: I'm perusing a document (Dumbarton Oaks Studies XXXVI: Siegecraft: Two Tenth-Century Instructional Manuals by 'Heron of Byzantium'", by Denis F. Sullivan, which I found at http://www.doaks.org/Etexts.html - URL: http://www.doaks.org/Siegecraft.pdf ).  In it, in a "marginal scolion" on page 33, "squill" is used in making "long-lasting rations".
It's "boiled, washed with water, dried and cut very thin; then sesame is mixed into it, one fifth part, and poppy one fifteenth, and all this is crushed and the best honey kneaded into it. Divide this into pieces the size of large olives. If one uses one of these at the second hour, another at the tenth, he will not be severely affected by hunger."
In another ration described in the paragraph immediately afterwards, the squill is prepared thus: "Peel the squill and cut away the roots and leaves, separating it into small pieces, put it in a mixing bowl, pound it very smooth."
(I'm confused about the procedure. I don't understand how one can cut away the roots and leaves _after_ peeling something, assuming one is working with a bulb or tuber from the start.) D021317c 21:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses 

message: The medical uses of "squill" refer to the species now called Drimia maritima, the Sea Squill, formerly Scilla maritima, but not now a Scilla. So I removed the material entirely. It could be added to the Drimia maritima article, I guess, but I leave that to others. Peter coxhead (talk) 16:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Medical uses
Talk:The Way I Am (Knoc-turn'al album)

message: On April 23, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep redirect.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/The Way I Am for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 22:29, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD
Talk:Cinematography

message: How are they different, and should 
Cinematography and []filmmaking]] be merged?CharlesHBennett (talk) 15:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cinematography vs filmmaking 

message: Cited aspect ratios are inconsistent throughout the article and some linked articles.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.211.72.207 (talk) 04:59, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errats
Talk:Red Shoe Diaries

message: i removed the tv and porn stub designations to this article since it is not a stub anymore (in my opinion anyway.) the article is still rather short but i feel complete. uri budnik 06:11, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: This article suggests that the Red Shoe movies were stand-alone films independent of the TV show. Except for the movies Red Shoe Diaries (1992) and Red Shoe Diaries: Las Vegas (2006), all of the numbered movies were DVDs that compiled three episodes each. So the movies section, to be informative, should list the films compiled in each numbered Red Shoe movie. Deanbrockton (talk) 06:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: There does not seem to be any articles covering the Red Shoes movies at all!!!--WickerGuy (talk) 18:28, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: PREPOSTEROUS. Snarevox (talk) 17:39, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Movies 

message: Should we list the stars of each episode ?
In particular, which actresses get their kit off ? -- Beardo 05:34, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stars 

message: More importantly than stars, can we get a synopsis of each episode? --70.23.19.31 (talk) 03:09, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synopses
Talk:Simon

message: would either of the mute admins explain why simon cowell and paul simon are under the section "historical", or why they are mentioned at all?
:There is no Historical section now; they should both be in the People list as they are both notable. Lkjhgfdsa 0 (talk) 06:02, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cowell, Paul 

message: What is with the Shim'on theres no apostrophe in the name so what is it there for? --Shimonnyman 19:28, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Apostrophe

message: Does anyone know who that is?  He's referenced in the Pool of Bethesda article.  Nareek 02:29, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simon the High Priest 

message: Both names (Simon & Sam) mean 'God has heard', are they not variants? 67.171.233.221 (talk) 12:56, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Actually neither carry this meaning explicitly. Simon doesn't have a literal meaning in hebrew (i am a native speaker). It stems from the verb "to hear", and in the original context means "God has heard", so the definition given in this value is incorrect.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simeon#Meaning
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saul#Saul.27s_name_and_Samuel.27s_birth-narrative
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel#Name  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.178.10.30 (talk) 11:20, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simon, Samuel
Talk:British Army Training Unit Suffield

message: Removed the words "remote" and "uninhabited" that were used in describing the base. While the base is certainly large, I am from the area and it is far from being "remote" and the surrounding prairie is certainly inhabited. The previous version gave the impression that the base is some isolated outpost in the depths of the Canadian wilderness, which is far from the truth. It is located adjacent to the most heavily travelled highway in Canada, just north of Medicine Hat and about a 2 hour drive from Calgary a city of ~a million people. Also changed around the first sentence to make it clear that the BATU is a British Unit located at CFB Suffield, the previous version made it sound as though BATU was a British owned base. mhunter 06:59, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspect BATUS seems remote and uninhabited from the point of view of a British soldier used to London or Liverpool! PeteVerdon 16:16, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll give you that one :) mhunter 07:08, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Remote yes, but not "uninhabited".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.180.212.165 (talk) 06:12, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Remoteness

message: *B1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations.  Fails Not enough secondary sources, and there's only 2 anyway so that can be improved.
*B2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies.  Passes Does not seem to omit anything crucial
*B3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content.  Passes
*B4. It is free from major grammatical errors.  Passes
*B5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams.  Passes
Overall, acceptable, C-Class. 69.165.196.103 (talk) 20:29, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Cognitive closure (philosophy)

message: This article is incredibly misleading. Cognitive closure is an issue relating to the cognitive balance theories of Heider and Festinger's cognitive dissonance. The article here is complete bluffing. I'm only a first year psychology student myself, so I don't feel qualified to edit this article, but I'd like to suggest that the article be removed if it isn't rewritten so as not to mislead people.
:The term "cognitive closure" may have several meanings, but it has been used in philosophy exactly as the article says.  Colin McGinn is one such philosopher who argues that the human mind is cognitively closed to explaining consciousness.  Whoever you are, please consider the fact that terms may used in multiple ways before ignorantly calling for the deletion of an article.  I agree that a disambiguation page and other revisions may be needed, but cognitive closure in philosophy is just as important a concept as cognitive closure in psychology.  Both deserve a page. Postmodern Beatnik 17:07, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading 

message: Please could someone have a look at Cognitive closure. 
This is a disambiguation page for Cognitive closure (psychology) and Cognitive closure (philosophy). The former is a one-line quote/definition, while the latter is just one paragraph long ! 
Thanks. thisisace (talk) 21:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The reason for multiple pages is discussed directly above. Postmodern Beatnik (talk) 01:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cognitive closure x 2 ! 

message: The Kant section is poorly written and there are some crucial mistakes made in what is written:
First off, the post claims that things in themselves are unthinkable. This is wrong. They are unknowable. The critical difference lies in the fact that, because we can think things in themselves, we make certain kinds of mistakes when trying to derive knowledge a priori about certain specific domains (psychology, cosmology, theology).
Secondly, even if Kant does think that things in themselves are unknowable, I am not sure this makes consciousness cognitively closed to finite rational beings. Kant's anthropology and understanding of biology, though still pre-Darwinian has at least some starting points around concepts of epigenesis and organismic interaction for how one would formulate a program for naturalizing great deals of what contemporary naturalists want to explain.
I think the Kant section should just be struck from the article since it doesn't have anything to bear on current debates on consciousness and naturalism.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SebastianO1989 (talk • contribs) 12:24, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kant section poorly written and deeply misleading