lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tan (surname)

message: "Tan" is also 陈/陳, use by many chinese in SE Asia. In this case Tan is the pronounciation/spelling of 陈/陳 in Hokkien/TeoChew dialect. So when someone tell you he is Tan, do not assume right away that he is  谭/譚.Wiki Pokemon 20:50, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 陳

message: where can i find the chinese version ?
can just put the website on?
put as chinese language also cannot find back this page...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.21.155.108 (talk) 08:16, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  chinese version  

message: This page has an error about Nigel. I think somebody says a joke.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanwenhao (talk • contribs) 18:31, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nigel 

message: Please do not add name without their traditional chinese name
Please do not add name if you only know they romanized name
Many people use “tan” as first name even it is not chinese surename, example tan malaka (from sutan malaka, padang)
And also many overseas chinese has surename tan (chen) but not tan (諢) 111.95.122.217 (talk) 12:21, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chinese name difference between chen and tan
Talk:Jean Cras

message: "Musical career" - "Associated acts: Henri Duparc". Explain, please. That doesn't scan as legible English... Schissel | Sound the Note! 00:42, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Associated acts 

message: From recordings I'd guess that his harp quintet was better known. Schissel | Sound the Note! 00:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best-known works 
Talk:Lucien Durosoir

message: Hello
I have edited this article, removing the false statement that Lucien Durosoir played the French première of Brahms' Concerto, altough what have been said in some newspapers in 1903. Actually, Henry (Henri) Marteau had played this work in France, in 1891. See the 1891 press, like :
http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5658624s/
It seems that Durosoir played the first time this Concerto in Paris, but not in France.
It would be fair to edit the Henri Marteau article - he also introduced the Dvorak Concerto in France - but I am afraid my English is too weak for that. I hope someone else can improve the Henri Marteau page.
Best thanks
Alain CF  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.166.127.159 (talk) 09:14, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Brahms' Concerto
Talk:Jean-Claude Éloy

message: What exactly in this article still requires inline citations?—Jerome Kohl (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind. Since posting this question, a vast new crop of uncited claims has been added.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 16:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Insufficient citations?
Talk:Antoine de Longueval

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; it would benefit from a works list, and possibly an image. My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 16:19, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Jean Braconnier

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  This article is B-class; it lacks primarily a works list, and some imagery, and it could use more inline citations.  My full review is on the comments page; questions and comments should be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 19:04, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:The Inquirer/Archive 1

message: ----
The Inquirer has been accused of manufacturing rumours or speculating aimlessly in order to inflate its number of visitors. 
However, most of these claims lack factual evidence, apart from references to older articles which in light of new information are no longer correct (an example would be an article talking about a planned product which has since been cancelled).
----
The part in bold was removed from the article, with the note "-POV". Why is it exactly not NPOV? The first sentence is actually not particularly NPOV, since without any sort of evidence it seems to be made with the sole intent to discredit the publication. If there is no evidence for them making up stories (apart from the false evidence, as I had mentioned) then why is this statement even added to the article?
For now, I've just added a  tag next to the statement. If someone can please find some good facts (not a Slashdot comment: goes against WP policy "Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources.") else that part should probably just be taken out.
--213.46.128.161 20:08, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older talk 

message: I think the article is generally much more NPOV now than before.  I chose to remove some sentences, such as "It often runs stories that are less than complimentary to tech companies" and "This often leads to accusations of bias from both sides of a debate, particularly Intel versus AMD." as those are generalities that can be applied to pretty much any technology website.  Most of the "oftens" were changed to "sometimes" or removed entirely (it's hard to definitively state something as occurring "often").
The Writing Style section was broken up, with a new Criticism section included.  Those two paragraphs in criticism have nothing to do with the writing style.  I also added the Other section because the fact that some writers visit a messageboard doesn't seem to fit in particularly well in other places.
There should certainly be more done on the page (there's still some extraneous information -- is it really necessary to know that they have published cease-and-desist letters?), but I think it fits in better with standards now. Kdawg 18:29, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, article looks more NPOV now.  Dionyseus 18:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Actually I didn't wipe the phrase out, I reverted one word from that phrase.  You posted on an anonymous IP and did not give an edit summary, and your edits were clearly POV and unsubstantiated. .  Dionyseus 10:00, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: They were POV, but contained possibly good information that could've easily been adjusted to a neutral tone. The information was unsourced, but I feel they should've stayed up a little while with some  tags, to at least give editors a chance to verify it. I've added the information back for now, making some small changes. Dancter 15:17, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Some New Changes
Talk:Pierre Fontaine (composer)

message: I have reviewed this article as part of the Composers project B-class article review.  My detailed review can be found on the comments page.  It is very near A-class, primarily lacking images.  Comments on my review can be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 16:49, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Composers project review
Talk:Reginaldus Libert

message: I've reviewed this article as part of the Composers project review of its B-class articles.  Article is not far from an A, and it might even get through a GA review with a modest amount of fuss.  Read my detailed review on the comments page; questions and comments can be left here or on my talk page. Magic♪piano 21:07, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Composer project review
Talk:Halcyon (dialogue)

message: Where is the story of Halcyon?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.53.140.217 (talk) 01:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

message: Many articles in Wikipedia include a section on "Legacy" or "In Popular Culture" - a sort of addendum that connects the subject with common contemporary knowledge or usage.  The word halcyon is used, as such, and the term "halcyon days" is maybe even more common - both with no capital H, just a common adjective or noun.  I'm a little surprised that this article doesn't, as yet, explain the derivation of the word or the term as used in English.  Having started or contributed to many, Wikipedia articles, I'd add this aspect myself if I knew it or had reference books at hand that I could cite in explanation.  Anyone?Joel Russ (talk) 16:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  A section could be added on the use of the word "halcyon"
Talk:Chin Lin Sou

message: An IP editor has added that his Chinese name is 支連蘇.  Is there a source for this?  I don't need it to be referenced in the article, I would just like to see this verified.  A quick Google search does not turn up anything.  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 18:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There was an interview from World Journal with the great-grandaughter of Chin Lin-Sou,  Jew Shu-Gui (朱淑贵), on 13 May 2013. According to her saying, the Chinese characters of Chin Lin-Sou should be 陈林新. The interview cannot be found on the internet now, but I found some part of the interview from a blog here (in Chinese). --WWbread （Open Your Mouth?） 15:02, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: His Chinese name
Talk:Windows Shell namespace

message: This should not be merged with Special Folders.  Special Folders are only one part of the Windows Shell namespace.  Special Folders could be combined into this, but only if Virtual Folders was added to this as well.
-----------------------------------------
I think this should be merged with Windows Explorer, as it is related to it, and has little content.
Vertigo2008 16:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Louis Pouzin

message: The article currently says "This network was the first actual implementation of the pure datagram model, initially imagined and described by Donald Davies", which I don't think is the best way to put it - and may have errors.
* CYCLADES was important because it was the first network to make reliability the responsibility of the hosts, not the network. This innovation was explicitly copied in TCP, as Cerf et al cheerfully acknowledge. The reference to "datagrams" is unfortunate, in my view, as it tends to disguise this key system engineering insight.
* The use of the phrase 'pure datagram model' is unfortunate, as the word 'datagram' changed its meaning over time. So one shouldn't rely on use of the word 'datagram' in a historical document to mean what it does now. It was originally a synonym for 'packet'; the meaning of 'user visible network service which is not reliable' probably started to come in with UDP. The meaning of 'synonym for packet' only disappeared slowly, after that, though.
* I'm not sure exactly how Davies' work differed from Baran's prior work, as it's been a long time since I read their stuff. I don't know whether Davies' original packet network used datagrams (in the modern sense) or not - but if it did, then the statement that CYCLADES was "the first actual implementation of the pure datagram model" is wrong. If it wasn't pure datagrams, but a mix, then Baran's work (which Davies cheerfully acknowledged the priority of) preceded him; and maybe the ARPANET too. (Whether Baran's network used 'pure datagrams' or not, I don't know - it may not have been designed/described in enough detail to make that determination.)
That's all part of why I feel that the best way to put Pouzin's contribution is to say that his design took the bold, innovative step of making reliability the responsibility of the hosts, not the network; this says clearly and crisply what the underlying engineering point is. It is this insight that led to the success of the internet model, and the Internet.
I don't have the energy to fix the article, though. There are a number of point I'd have to investigate (above) first. Perhaps someone else will. I will bring this question up on the internet-history mailing list, to get the views of those pioneers still with us on record. Noel (talk) 15:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Datagrams
Talk:Danger music

message: I have removed the  tag from , which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia.  I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it.  If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the  template back to the article.  Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion.  Thanks! Warden (talk) 17:55, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Prod

message: This article has been mentioned in a post on consequence.net. The site's "About Us" page lists multiple editorial staff and some accolades, and may be considered a reliable source. I was about to add  but its documentation states "Do not use this template to highlight poor quality sources that would not normally be sufficient to support article content" and thought I'd start this discussion about the source's "quality" to see what others think first. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 23:32, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Mentioned in the press
Talk:Hapworth 16, 1924

message: "Most recently it was rescheduled for publication on January 1 2009, Salinger’s ninetieth birthday, but it did not appear" is given an inline citation to this page. Nowhere on that page is an abortive 2009 publication mentioned. Loganberry (Talk) 19:48, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  The third footnote is not correct
Talk:Jean Martinon

message: Hi to Emerson7: Why is Martinon's period in Chicago excluded from the chart of his positions? Thanks, --Wspencer11 (talk to me...) 11:46, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSO directorship 

message: The box showing Orchestre national de France music directors has a wrong date for Maazel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.95.223.60 (talk) 12:29, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong date 
Talk:Louis-Antoine Jullien

message: I wonder if this is the person that Monty Python got their idea for the "Johan Gambolputty ... von Hauptkopf of Ulm" sketch in their "It's The Arts" episode. Just a thought. Chris 13:47, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Johan Gambolputty 

message: *:File:Latour-jullien.JPG: is this our lad?--Wetman (talk) 06:25, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture?
Talk:Harmonia Sacra

message: There was another Harmonia Sacra, unrelated to this one as far as I know, published by Thomas Butts in England in the 1750s plus revised editions in years following. It is still cited in current hymn books as a source for certain traditional hymns, but I don't know how frequently. A copy of the first American edition of that other book can be seen at https://imslp.org/wiki/Harmonia-Sacra_(Butts,_Thomas) TooManyFingers (talk) 05:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another book by the same name
Talk:Bertrand de Billy

message: Because the prior version was essentially verbatim from de Billy's webpage, I have rewritten it.  DJRafe (talk) 01:25, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article rewrite
Talk:Harold and the Purple Crayon

message: In the Adaptations section, I added a mention that Jimmy Kimmel presented a parody of Harold and the Purple Crayon on his show (the episode of September 6, 2019, to be exact). This segment can be found here on the show's official YouTube channel. I don't know how to add this official YouTube video as a citation for my addition to the article, though. —⁠173.129.1.52 (talk) 13:21, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  2019 ''Jimmy Kimmel Live!'' parody 

message: — Assignment last updated by Crh110 (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ENGL 2730-05 - Children's Literature
Talk:Charles Bruck

message: === Succession ===
"A few years after Pierre Monteux's death, Doris Monteux named Charles Bruck (1911-1995) the second music director of the school. " It would be good to know whether the program was closed for those few years, or whether he ran it w/o the title in the interim.--Jerzy•t 17:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maine 

message: "A few years after Pierre Monteux's death, Doris Monteux named Charles Bruck (1911-1995) the second music director of the school. " It would be good to know whether the program was closed for those few years, or whether he ran it w/o the title in the interim.--Jerzy•t 17:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Succession 
Talk:Jean Fournet

message: * ... he was given the title Honorary Conductor in 1989, and on his death in 2008 he was honored again with the title Permanent Honorary Conductor.
Can this be correct?  What's the purpose of giving someone an honour only after they die?  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 19:28, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Odd sentence
Talk:Marc Minkowski

message: I think this guy is a bit over-evaluated (French chauvinism)...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.223.116.188 (talk) 23:33, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Having listened to some of his recordings, attended a few concerts and read some critics, I don't see anything over-evaluated here. Vlavv (talk) 11:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Harry Hole

message: == Pronunciation of 'Harry Hole' == Hoo-lah. 
Can someone add the phonetic pronunciation of 'Harry Hole' please? From my scant knowledge of Scandinavian languages I would expect the 'r's to be lightly rolled and the surname to be pronounced something like Hur-ler. 83.104.249.240 (talk) 02:44, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, that's how his colleagues down under pronounced it in The Bat but, as Harry himself accepts with a certain resignation, that is only an approximation of how he himself would pronounce it. To quote from the novel, "Harry Hole considered his options. He had decided to spend the first days in Australia correcting the pronunciation of his surname so that he wouldn't be confused with apertures or orifices. Mr Holy however, was infinitely preferable." 83.104.249.240 (talk) 16:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Denis Vrain-Lucas

message: The name was wrong throughout: it's Denis Vrain-Lucas!  I changed it in the text but would someone with Wikipedia skills and privileges please rename this page to remove the non-existant name "Vrain Denis-Lucas" and replace it with the correct name? There is no need for any redirect -- the current name just does not make sense.
Needless to say, this did not reinforce my trust in Wikipedia in general. B-Meyer (talk) 13:49, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Someone please correct the page name
Talk:Jean de Sperati

message: Hi when translating this page I noticed conflicting details between the original article in German and the stub in English or, at the very least, details that were unclear.  Even the links provided were not unambiguous.
Was Sperati sentenced to 1 year in prison or 2?
Details of the trial(s) are ambiguous.  Was there one trial or two?  The English stub refers to a trial abandoned due to war and a linked article makes reference to a nominal fine (for disrupting customs activities) at an earlier stage.  The German article refers only to the main trial.
I have left as per the German article but I am not certain this is correct.  Could anyone who knows please amend with correct information please.  If the German article is incorrect, update the English article and I will make corresponding changes to the German article.
My only interest is in translating, not biographies or stamps.
Billy1968 (talk) 02:47, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Query some details on this page 

message: I would like to work on this article.  I'm looking at the German version from the link on the translation page;  is this the current article, and not a permalink?  
The first thing I'd like to change is in the lead; the original uses words that emphasize the fact that authenticators attested to the genuineness of his stamps, not just that they did not uncover them as forgeries.  It's a nuance that I'm going to aim to include, right....about.........now.  Eleven even (talk) 14:36, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stepping in 

message: * I looked through the revision history and it seems the value in francs that Locard placed on the stamps at the 1948 trial has been in the article from the beginning.  Skysmith, was that in the German version?  I don't see it there now.  Eleven even (talk) 15:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions
Talk:Alexandre Stavisky

message: This article seems to consist largely of book reviews, complete with numbers of illustrations and copyright information. Surely this is not how a biographical article should be?
I don't know what you're talking about, but nevertheless I wonder if Stavitsky really was born in Ukraine. In other articles it says his *parents* was born in Ukraine and immigrated to France. Can someone enlighten us on this matter?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.250.97.23 (talk) 21:22, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Book reviews?
Talk:Neurological fatigue

message: My understanding of neurological/neurogenic fatigue is that it is also a very common symptom of other diagonisis, not just M.S. Examples are Traumatic Brain Injury including concussion, Stroke, Hypoxic and other types of aquired brain injury. Surely this site should reflect the reality of neurological fatigue in these other conditions? Please contribute to make this information more conprehensive. 
Occupational Therapist working in Neuro rehabilitation 18/06/07
Well, I thought I would get an article started on this as it affects the vast majority of the millions of multiple sclerosis sufferers worldwide. Common knowledge of neurological fatigue as a real and common symptom of MS will benifit all Multiple sclerosis sufferers. Please help us all out by expanding or editing this article! Aformalevent 22:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: My

message: The second "external information" link leads to a page saying that no input file is specifying. This needs to be fixed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gakrivas (talk • contribs) 16:30, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link leads to empty page 

message: Is it fatigue associated with neurological disorders such as MS, Parkinson's, traumatic brain injury and stroke? Is there a textbook chapter or systematic review that explains its nature? If it is simply a group term for fatigue associated with neurological disorders, it may be more useful to insert a section on fatigue into the articles for each of those disorders, --Anthonyhcole (talk) 17:26, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have the same question. As the page is now written, it appears to be specific to MS, which sounds dubious to me. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In my experience, it amounts to a fancy word used by MS patients to differentiate normal fatigue from particularly horrible fatigue caused by MS.  IMO the page should redirect to a subsection in Fatigue (medical).  WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:31, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: What is neurological fatigue?
Talk:Antara Dua Darjat

message: When was this film released?  This article claimed both 1962 and 63, IMDb says 1960, and List of P. Ramlee films gives the release date as 1955.  I've just checked quickly via Google, and all off-site references I noticed said 1960, so I'll alter here and at the list. Jeodesic 22:49, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Release Date

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MER-C 08:38, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 