lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ross Barnett Reservoir

message: OK, I am going to take a shot at expanding this article beyond a stub. Sources are going to be a bit scarce, and I could use some help if there are any takers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eskimo.the (talk • contribs) 17:41, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding Article 

message: OK, the new and (hopefully) improved verion is up. I am going back and forth between the Pearl River Water District website and the Rezonate.com web page for sources. I am not really familiar with how to source info just yet, but I will figure it out. If anybody is wanted to revert because of no sourcing please, please give me 24 hours to get the sources in before you do anything! --The Eskimo 18:35, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Version Complete -Sources 

message: Think I've got the page a little closer to non-stub status. A couple of good sources and external links are provided as well. Now I just need to expand a bit. I'd like to see section about flood control added to the history section since Jackson has had a few major floods since the Rez was built, and some people point to the Rez as a problem and/or solution to flood control. Also maybe some specific numbers about the actual function of the Rez, as far as outflow, water depth, seasonal trends, etc, and maybe something about the water quality since it is a public water source. Wildlife would also be a good section. Anyone willing to help would be much appreciated. I have been looking at the Lake Tahoe article for some direction on how a good article looks. --The Eskimo 19:27, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ready to Roll 
Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming/List of users of NLP

message: * The British Psychological Society, which lists NLP alongside Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Hypnotherapy as 3 therapies that come under the remit of the UK Council for Psychotherapy (UKCP), providing a link for people seeking these therapies. Further, its 4th Annual Continuing Education Program included a key-note speaker talking on NLP (Leanne Harris, University of Hertfordshire). It has also awarded (2004) its key Level B accreditation to a psychometric profile system based upon NLP meta programs, citing "several years of rigorous empirical testing" -- See below (next section).
* In 1994 the ANLP (British NLP association) Professional and Counselling Services was awarded a representative on the Governing Board of the UK Council for Psychotherapy.UKCP sources: representative status: , current membership: NLPtca.com website and UKCP 2005 members list PDF. It continues to be a member organization in good standing of that body at the present time.
* Neuro-Linguistic Psychotherapy & Counselling Association (NLPtCA) British Organisation for accreditation of NLP Therapists and regulation of NLP Therapy. A member organisation of the UK Council of Psychotherapy.(UKCP). NLPtCA accredits and regulates NLP psychotherapists in the UK and promotes NLP therapy as a psychological therapy modality. http://www.nlptca.com/     — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anningham (talk • contribs) 10:58, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychological and other clinical bodies
Talk:Thirty-Eight Minutes

message: At the start of the episode, only five Chevrons are dialed to open the stargate... shouldn't this be seven? Tiranak 04:41, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chevrons 
Talk:Suspicion (Stargate Atlantis)

message: I've expanded and partly rewritten this; is it long enough now to lose the "stub" category? Whichwould 13:17, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Home (Stargate Atlantis)

message: can the teams on Atlantis return to Earth for real now?
70.70.200.96 03:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Storm (Stargate Atlantis)

message: Is it just me, or partway through the episode does Zelenka completely lose his Czech accent? Anybody else notice this? JBK405 01:54, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Zelenka's accent
Talk:Before I Sleep (Stargate Atlantis episode)

message: I'm just letting people know the reasons for removing the goof, instead of just removing it. If you wish to re-add it, we can discuss it here, or move the discussion to Gateworld forums, which would probably be a more appropriate place.
I'm removing this goof because the pilot for SGA shows her knowing all the various players. She is familiar with McKay enough to know about test results, familiar enough with Carson to try to calm him down with the drone, familiar enough with Aiden, etc. Who knows how many weeks or days are between the opening of the pilot, and when they actually go through the Stargate. Quite simply, we have no verification that it's something that she shouldn't have said, and without verification, it's not for Wikipedia. Regards, Jordan.Kreiger (talk) 20:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Goof 
Talk:Peter Lei

message: The styling "His Eminence" should only refers to a cardinal, not an ordinary diocesan bishop as in this case.
--Raphaelhui 09:02, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Styling
Talk:The Siege, Part 3

message: Why are there seperate pages for part 1 and 2 (S01) and part 3(S02)? I fail to see neither the use, nor the thought behind it. I suggest merging them, and editing the link on the list of Stargate Atlantis episodes accordingly. Mzyxptlk 15:32, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Seperate pages for part1/2 and part 3
Talk:The Intruder (Stargate Atlantis)

message: How is it possible to fly a F-302 without any disc attached at all? Why didnt that Sheppard guy remove the disc in the beginning in order to regain control of the ship? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.135.75.90 (talk) 13:43, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logic? 
Talk:Calypsonian

message: I removed the last two edits:
  More modern day 'caisonians' like Chalkdust of Trinidad, 
  Mighty Gabby of Barbados, and Lord Cam of Nevis are 
  also great forces to be reckoned with.
The reason being, this page is a brief description of what a calypsonian is, not a list of calypsonians. We have List_of_calypso_musicians for that. The brief list of leading calypsonians of the 20th century in the article allows people to find out more if they are unfamiliar with the field, but to list minor calypsonians seems mistaken, because where will it end? If we mention Gabby and Cam why not Small Island Pride, Rabbit, Wizzard and so on? and if we do that then we end up with the article being largely a list of calypsonians. James Fryer 11:22, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Condemned (Stargate Atlantis)

message: Is it me or did alot of the scences look like they were from the USA series the 4400? Xaios 00:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of prime ministers of the Netherlands

message: There apparently are five prime minsters with currently only non-free images. With each of these images there is this line:
*Purpose of use: This image should only be used on the person-lemma and information on Prime Ministers of the Netherlands
This page fits the description "information on Prime Ministers of the Netherlands" and people will keep re-adding the images to complete the list until ESkog gives up reverting it and finds him/herself some free images. One could avoid this by hiding the images and leaving a (hidden) message with them rather than deleting them, but this solution was instantly "fixed" by Garion96 with an ever so useful edit summary ("fix").  Can someone explain the rationale for the deletions and fixes? Is the above "purpose-of-use" line incorrect perhaps? Afasmit (talk) 12:53, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. non-free images fail the non-free content criteria on this list. Regarding a hidden message, that might be useful. But to have the non-free image hidden in the article makes no sense since there is no way these images will ever be allowed in the article. Garion96 (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Annoyingly, there are now licensed photos of Biesheuvel and de Quay at commons, but these have identical file names to the non-free images saved on the English wiki project. Someone with some authority on commons needs to change the file names. BartBassist (talk) 22:51, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-free media use

message: Is it possible to have a greater color distinction between Conservative and Liberal Prime Ministers?  There are a lot of colors available and selecting a slightly darker tone of the same color doesn't make a lot of sense. Just my 2¢. Jtyroler (talk) 09:04, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the similarity of colour is deliberate: it illustrates the lack of clear distinction or division between different political factions in early Dutch politics. However, it is certainly true that two shades of blue with greater contrast could be found. BartBassist (talk) 09:14, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Color Selection 
Talk:Epiphany (Stargate Atlantis)

message: Instead of a bullet point, in some cases almost a paragraph, for each invisible monster that tests courage, or else no reference, why not compromise with a list in a See Also section, or a list in one bullet point per theme?  Jim.henderson 14:33, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Forbidden Trivia
Talk:Sanford (TV series)

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episodes and characters, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters

message: All episodes were 22, 24, and 25 minutes in length. I think the graph on the page should be corrected to reflect that. It currently says that running time was "22-24 minutes." It should say "22-25 minutes." milladrive (talk) 04:16, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode running time
Talk:Colour the Small One

message: *Why doesn't "Breathe Me" have it's own page? It is more of the album article, it deserves a seperate page from this one. (99.237.16.151 (talk) 00:23, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Also agree. That other singles have articles while it doesn't suggests that yet another asinine edit war took place and some overzealous type killed it.  RoyBatty42 (talk) 08:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: "Breathe Me" Article.jpg

message: *http://www.thefader.com/2006/09/27/greg-laswell-to-support-sia-on-us-tour
HĐ (talk) 12:24, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Human blood group systems

message: Should this page be made into a List? I feel that Blood type provides sufficient Background (history, content, explanations etc.) to the reader for this article only to be a list that complements the Blood type article. Otherwise, we would just repeat all content written in Blood type article in own subheadings here. That seems unnecessary. Thoughts on this? --Treetear (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, that seems like a good idea--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:27, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

text: I agree - Blood type seems the right place for the broader explanation. CharlesSpencer (talk) 10:58, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

text: Disagree, now that more prose has been added to the article since the comments above. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:45, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article -> List? 

message: As of today there is a "contradictory" flag after the approximate number of minor blood groups. Why is that there without any further discussion? Which article does this contradict? </br> 77.138.224.125 (talk) 22:25, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I presume it's because the "200+ minor blood groups" number contradicts Blood type "across the 36 blood groups, over 340 different blood-group antigens have been found,", and Rh blood group system "the Rh blood group system is one of thirty-five known human blood group systems," and a number of other locations. It seems like it should clarify that these numbers refer to "major blood groups", and the "200+" number refers to both major and minor blood groups, if that is true. AMWJ (talk) 13:35, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  contradictory? 

message: Right now the wikilink for Augustine group links to Augustine of Hippo. Don’t see how that’s relevant, unless he discovered/had that blood type. 97.116.94.89 (talk) 21:04, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Augustine

message: "38 major human systems are identified as of August 2019"
:at line 11 is inconsistent with
"As of 2019, a total of 41 human blood group systems are recognized by the International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT)" at line 15 of the latter article. 
:I'm requesting help with updating this info in both articles —CrafterNova [ TALK ]  [ CONT ] 19:50, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  - both pages are outdated, it's 43 now. I've updated the articles. Spicy (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information inconsistent with [[Blood type]] 

message: In case people haven't seen this: 
* 
- PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 07:48, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Blood Group System 'Er'
Talk:No Man's Land (Stargate Atlantis)

message: Teyla is in command? Did I miss something? I didn't think she was in the chain of command. Wouldn't Sheppard be in command? Hackwrench 20:12, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Irresistible (Stargate Atlantis)

message: I'm not sure but if i remember correctly, gate chevrons refer to star constellations:
A set of 7 chevrons attaches to a planet (which over time the gate system compensates for).
A set of 8 chevrons connects to a planet in another galaxy.
So if that's correct, space gates can only work when in orbit of a respective planet. So mckay's plan of gathering multiple gates and then using them to act as a bridge, to shorten the time between Pegasus and the Milky Way, won't work because there's no planets? Fusionblue 20:24, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The way I understand it, the address represents an area in space, not necessarily a planet. Noneofyourbusiness 01:17, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity Error 
Talk:Progeny (Stargate Atlantis)

message: Can someone explain to me how these summarys are being written before the episode premires in America? dposse 02:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: what the hell?

message: The edit summary should have read "Surely one anti-trivia warning box is enough for this article."  WhatamIdoing 01:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Apologies
Talk:The Real World (Stargate Atlantis)

message: Why Sheppard was not infected: They imply that the nanites failed to attack him because they were focusing on Weir. But IIRC, last episode we learned that they cannot attack the Ancients, and Sheppard is an ancient as far as genetic is concerned, because the ATA gene is what is always used to distinguish genetically between ancients and non-Ancients. Tacvek 21:39, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Sheppard was not infected 
Talk:McKay and Mrs. Miller

message: Ok, why is everyone taking that name seriously? I think it's fake/a nickname because Meredith is FEMALE name NOT a male one and yes, I did look it up to be certain it wasn't like Leslie or another one of those female common male uncommon names. I have seen people editing the pages to reflect that this is his real name and I think it's disputable.
Faris b 19:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: actually, Meredith was a guys name a long time ago, along with Ashley, plus, there was no reason why his sister would call him Meredith if it wasnt his name, nor would he even acknowledge this as his real name. Simply put, it is his real name... -Xornok 21:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

text: because your reference knows all? -Xornok 23:41, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

text: Your reference is irrelevant. McKay's parents can have named him anything they wanted, and he himself said, "It's Meredith Rodney McKay, I go by Rodney". -- Noneofyourbusiness 20:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meredith? 

message: When Samantha Carter is teleported to another universe in "The Road not Taken" it's because the Carter in that universe was drawing power from parallel universes. It seems to me that this is quite similar to this episode. I thought I would mention it here before adding it to the article in case I was mistaken about the events of either episode. Can anyone confirm?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.208.240 (talk) 14:42, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does Carter do the same thing as "Rod"? 
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia in books

message: I think this should probably be divided into "books which discuss Wikipedia in general" and "books which reference specific articles on specific topics". pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:25, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A division between treatments and uses of Wikipedia was already made (see Wikipedia:Wikipedia as a book source). --Chealer (talk) 05:12, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: This page needs to be updated because it was updated only as of December 2006. PrestonH 03:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates 

message: I have deleted the following section from the article.  There is no evidence this is an actual book.  There is no book listed under its ISBN in either WorldCat or the Library of Congress, and title and author searches at the Library of Congress also come up with nothing.  It appears to be a link to a website with a spurious ISBN. Bruxism (talk) 23:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spurious book? 

message: The Signpost is seeking more reviewers for a range of upcoming and recent books related to Wikipedia (yes, this list is badly out of date).  Sign up at the review desk.--ragesoss (talk) 05:09, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Reviewing books for the Wikipedia Signpost
Talk:Andrew Hickenlooper

message: See Google search. - Mgm|(talk) 09:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible relevant links for sourcing 

message: He was a Republican, but this article never mentions that fact.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 02:17, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Republican!
Talk:Mogo

message: Seems to me there's more than a hint of Stanislaw Lem's famous "Solaris" here (I've never even heard of this particular series, since I stopped reading 'Green Lantern' decades ago. ;)
I don't think I have to stretch any argument too far to make this case, even not knowing anything about this storyline: it's a pretty unique concept (i.e. not the idea of magic planets per se; but planets which "shapeshift" somehow, using regular, but higher-order physics).
So shouldn't this be mentioned in the article, then? After chasing down whether this supposition is true or not, of course.
Pazouzou 02:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lem's Solaris and Mogo 

message: I think the description of the prophecy is a bit off; I thought the blink bombs were tools of the Children of the White Lobe, and I remember that they did wind up being central to the use of Blink Bombs in the actual attempt by the Sinestro Corps to kill Mogo. If anyone has a copy, can you correct that or point me out wrong? Complex.confusion (talk) 14:23, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prophecy 

message: @Rhino131, you said that there's a reliable independent source, but which one is it? There's so much in-universe cruft in the sources list, that I can't find it. I suspect that once we trim this down to whatever is in that source, that we won't have enough length left to justify a stand-alone article anyway. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:46, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Oiyarbepsy See the reception section. There is a chapter discussing Mogo in the book Green Lantern and Philosophy. If this article were to be merged into a list, that information would go with it. But that would be done through a merge proposal, not a redirect (which is essentially a sneaky way to delete an article without gaining consensus). Rhino131 (talk) 04:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent sources
Talk:Better dead than red

message: I have done a keyword search of the Chicago Tribune, the L.A. Times, the N.Y. Times, and the Washington Post and have found no evidence of a Nazi connection for this phrase.  I used the ProQuest Historial Newspapers database, which extends back into the 19th Century.  
The earliest use that I could find of either "Better Red than dead" or "Better dead than Red" comes from 1961, after the former slogan had become popular among British pacifists.  The earliest uses I can find of "Better dead than Red" are responses to "Better Red than dead," suggesting that the former appeared prior to the latter.  
There are no articles in this newspaper database that suggest a Nazi or German origin for either term.  The person usually cited as the coiner (of the "Better Red" version, which seems to have come first) is Bertrand Russell.
Since when was "possibly" valid enough to mention without any real citation? 70.176.172.73 (talk) 01:52, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  No evidence of Nazi connection (after search of major newspapers) 

message: The article should be moved to "Better dead than red" since this version is much more famous.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pedro8790 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, wasn't this article originally titled, "Better Dead than Red?"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.157.127.37 (talk) 18:19, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Any evidence? ItsPugle (please ping on reply) 03:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Twice as many results on Google for "Better Dead than Red" over "Better Red than Dead". "Better Dead" also comes first alphabetically, and the phrase chronologically came first, by several decades over "Better Red". Sadistik (talk) 03:21, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, as this slogan is most famous around anti-communism and should thus reflect such.--Blockhaj (talk) 00:15, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

text: All international articles (except Portuguese) has rather dead.--Blockhaj (talk) 00:17, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving article 

message: "Live free or die" and "Better red than dead" are antithetical mottos.  They can be juxtaposed, and the theme expanded.50.43.163.127 (talk) 00:44, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  A corollary
Talk:Queen Elizabeth Bridge, Belfast

message: Is this not the same as the Queen's Bridge? Stu ’Bout ye! 10:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they're two distinct bridges. See a map. Colin Watson (talk) 10:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fairly sure the bridge is just called the "Queen Elizabeth Bridge", ie no "2nd" in the title. --81.138.8.26 (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

text: Yes, the bridge is called the "Queen Elizabeth Bridge". There is no "2nd" in the name. The plaque on the bridge confirms this: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Queen_Elizabeth_Bridge,_Belfast,_June_2010_(02).JPG The title of this page ought to be changed. --188.223.220.211 (talk) 22:22, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Halstead Town F.C.

message: This article is currently written as a club biography, presumably by a fan of the club or something to do with them. It's also far too long for a very minor club. Dancarney 10:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The length isn't a problem - I wish all our football club articles could be this detailed some day. But it does need rewriting to be less of a personal view. — sjorford++ 08:55, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio?

message: I am not sure how to edit the club's kits on the right hand side, however the home kit is now Black and white halves (Black on the player's right) with alternate sleeves. The away kit is plain blue with blue shorts and socks. Callelujah 18:59, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. And it only took eight months :D Del♉sion23 (talk) 17:36, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Away kit