lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kestrel

message: There is a similar page Falconidae. Are they really two different pages? They should at least link to each other.
Anyone who knows more to do the edits?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by LosManos (talk • contribs) 09:01, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Difference from Falconidae?

message: What does this paragraph near the top mean?
"The Kestrel is also famous for being the nickname of Keri Lynch of Sutton Coldfield. Born on the 25th July, she is sister of King Harry Lynch"
If this is really of any importance, should it not be moved to the Disambiguation page?
In other words, what does this have to do with the bird in question?
Dash 16:09, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it's nonsense. jimfbleak 04:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Who?

message: Are there enough taxonomic data to classify this group of species in it's own subgenus? As it seems by the article there is a rather clear evolutionary lineage for the kestrels to be considered a dinstinct monophyletic group in the Falco genus.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.219.127.169 (talk) 14:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Subgenus Kestrelus?

message: Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*support makes sense to me  jimfbleak 19:39, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: The article states, "Kestrels can hover in still air, even indoors in barns."  There doesn't seem to be a source, quote, or other supporting data for the fact.  Looking for further info, I find this /exact/ statement multiple places online... presumably originating here on Wikipedia.  What I cannot seem to find is anything like an prior source for the information. 2601:645:503:79D0:1886:71B6:DC03:DB4C (talk) 15:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced info? 

message: I gotta say, the heading "Description" looks a hell of a lot more like phylogeny than a description. Buried at the bottom of the first paragraph is "grey in their wings." I came to the page looking for size, color, and appearance, and can't find it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Treethinker (talk • contribs) 13:25, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description?
Talk:ManKind Project

message: I am going to sit this one out to avoid conflict of interest, but how relevant are criticisms coming from an internet forum, particularly those which are completely closed or closed to one side? This would be relevant for the criticism sub-headings re Rick Ross and the Yahoo Group "Ex-MKP." Rorybowman (talk) 20:38, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Any experiences of those who were involved with the group are relevant.  The MKP's website is "closed" to editing or discussion; yet it is quoted in the article (describing the group in quite a flattering way).  If the group's own descriptions can be used, surely those of former participants can as well.  Whistling42 (talk) 20:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

text: At this point, there's the POV problem that "criticism" is separated from "public reception", as if it's not part of that reception... and even given that separation, the "criticism" section is laden with defenses. --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:23, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism Section ([[WP:RS]], [[WP:EL]], Notability, etc) 

message:  and  were added to the article five months ago, but there is nothing on the Talk page regarding reasons for their addition, what is needed to remove them, etc. That is one reason I created this section, i.e., to have a place to discuss the POV and third-party notices.
In addition, this article has been contentious for many years, although perhaps less so in recent years. Nonetheless, it elicits strong reactions from folks, so I think it's important to discuss any controversial issues here. 
I made some edits today that others might disagree with, e.g., I removed the Cults category; I took out a section that was all criticism and cited the 2007 Houston Chronicle article, which is already referenced with some detail in the Criticism section. Let's discuss such issues here and try to reach a consensus. 
Thanks!   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) 08:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the POV and third-party templates as I believe these problems have been rectified. If you believe otherwise, please discuss here, particularly with regard to how we can add more information from reliable sources that would in your view eliminate concerns about the article's objectivity and accuracy. Thanks!   - Mark D Worthen PsyD (talk) 11:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of view, Neutrality, References 

message: I have found the following resource directly from MKP's website: https://mkpconnect.org/sites/default/files/2011PrimaryIntegrationTrainingandI-GroupManual.pdf
Even though it's from 2011, it seems to give very deep insights into the practices of MKP, which might be very relevant for the Wikipedia article.
It's part of "The ManKind Project Information Web" (mkpconnect.org) and quite certainly it's not meant to be publicly available. So probably it makes most sense to store it in the Internet Archive (archive.org) first, so that it won't be lost. Sigalor (talk) 08:54, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  First-hand resources about ManKind Project
Talk:Gricel Mamery

message: Gricel mamery → Gricel Mamery – This is a proper name, and should be capitalized.  The proper destination is blocked by a redirect. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 21:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Add any additional comments
*See the deletion page. This has been brought up and it was suggested to hold off on the move until the AFD concludes. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 22:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I just want to make a comment: There´s a mistake in the article. You say Gricel was named so because of the song "Gricel" (tango), usually performed by Carlos Gardel. Well, Carlos Gardel never did it. He died about 5 years before that song was written by the author, José María Contursi.
:Add any additional comments
*See the deletion page. This has been brought up and it was suggested to hold off on the move until the AFD concludes. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 22:12, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Tatsuki Arisawa

message: Can't we add more information here? All recent appearences of Tatsuki has been added in the Character Outline. Can't we like, make another section describing Tatsuki in more detail? Afterall, she can see the shinigamis and arrancars, surely she'll have some importance in the story. Besides, she knows that Inoue has disappeared, so I don't think she'll sit around and do nothing. And her relationship with Ichigo should be a bit more emphasized, since in recent manga chapters the depth of their friendship has been revealed. I don't know, I just feel we can give Tatsuki a longer page with more details. Sumhtun 06:20, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've seperated plot details from the character info. I'm going to reread the "smash head into glass" chapter and see if I can flesh out some details about her and Ichigo. I think there's also an early chapter that had some more info about her. Gdo01 00:09, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information 

message: I'm pretty sure Urahara's cryptic message meant that it's time for those high school students to do their part, rather than Urahara's to do his.  Article has been changed accordingly, but if the translation I read was wrong, then feel free to change it back.  -- Seraphchoir 19:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tatsuki at Urahara's 

message: Should Tasuki and Kegio not have thier own pages?Janpanrocks56 18:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tasuki's page

message: Is this official pic from her databook worth placing and describing anywhere in her page?
http://img378.imageshack.us/img378/8042/tatsukishinigamiwv3.jpg
MasqueradeOfLies 10:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Shinigami Powers?
Talk:Han Tzu

message: This page is way too informal. Anyone willing to give Han Tzu an actual encyclopedia entry?--Sol Kiske 21:42, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Tried teh bes I could, but I don't remember much of Han Tzu in EG and havnen't read SOTG enough times to really get a good grasp of his character. Hbdragon88 07:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Informal
Talk:Vox (comics)

message: Is the redirection from Herald (comics) to this article correct?  I just want to be sure before I fix all the double redirects that were created when I fixed the article of the title. -- Natalya 21:47, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: More importantly, how do we fix the improperly done redirect so that the real page history is intact? CovenantD 01:53, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh dear, it looks like the first move was a cut and paste move.  Thanks for pointing that out.  I've added a history merging tag, and will list the details at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. -- Natalya 02:52, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you. I suppose I should take the time to learn the process. Maybe next time. :) CovenantD 03:07, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it's been taken care of.  Lovely! -- Natalya 11:33, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirection
Talk:Karen, Kenya

message: The name of this suburb is misspelled several times as "Langata" ("ng'" and "ng" are different sounds in Swahili, like the difference between "singer" and "finger" in English). I can't change some of the errors, as they are links which would be activated or damaged if I tried to.213.127.210.95 (talk) 14:56, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Editing links doesn't activate or damage them. Go ahead and fix the errors you see. -  Metalello talk 02:21, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lang'ata
Talk:To Catch a Thief (novel)

message: Should this become a disambiguation page? Aside from the book there is the 1955 film To Catch a Thief (film), An episode by that name at List of The Suite Life of Zack & Cody episodes and a 1936 film by the same name:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0028387/
David Straub (talk) 15:29, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The possibility is being addressed at Talk:To Catch a Thief (film)#Requested move. - Best, Ev (talk) 21:22, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation page?

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:To Catch a Thief (film) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 21:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:IT Service Management Forum

message: The article needs to be much clearer in its definition of the itSMF.  The original organization was named the IT Infrastructure Management Forum (ITIMF) and served just the United Kingdom.  It was renamed to the itSMF UK on the 2nd of April 1997.  The article implies it has operated in its current format since 1991, it has not, neither in name, nor as an elected, membership driven body.
The itSMF International organization was incorporated as a UK company on July 26th 2004.  As of May 1st, 2006, records indicate it has no staff, no electoral system, a newly appointed board (November 2005), and is operations managed by the staff of itSMF UK.  There is no published governance scheme explaing how it interoperates with the internationally formed 'country chapters' beyond them having one vote each at the Annual General Meeting.
Three officers are named in the company record for itSMF International.  There are extremely strong polictical and organizational ties with itSMF UK.  Up to date information on both organizations is available via the public record at Companies House, London UK where all company records are lodged and stored.
The US equivalent of the itSMF UK, itSMF USA was formed in 1996 by ITSMI, ManageOne, and HP.
Itsmi 21:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

message: Dear all, I like to do some review and revision for this article. My ideas about a structure:
* introcdution as international movement
* history
* relation
* international activities
* national chapters
Any good hints to do the revision? Any mind to do nothing?
--Bernd F Dollinger (talk) 14:41, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Now I did an entire revision - some feedback about this? --Bernd F Dollinger (talk) 21:57, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  review & revision
Talk:Djam Karet

message: Hi, I need to address the speedy deletion.  Djam Karet has over 10 albums, has been around for 20 years, has toured extensively, etc.  There were several links to an empty Djam Karet page and I felt that I needed to fill in the blank. :-)
I love this band, but the writeup sounds like a fan review, not an objective overview. Black Max (talk) 19:56, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Martin Ingram

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 14:40, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: This article has some serious BLP issues. There is a lot of opinion disguised as analysis and lots of unsourced discussion that furthers a point of view. I don't really have time to do the research required to clean this up appropriately, so I'm going to list it as BLP/N in the hope someone there can attempt it. Rockpocket 00:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BLP issues 

message: I came here from the BLP discussion board. Looking over the article it seems like the editor is trying to make a case against this person, not just presenting the facts. It also seems like kind of a long article about an anonymous person. Borock (talk) 18:30, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV issues
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Nick Berg conspiracy theories (3rd nomination)

message: Don't delete. Of course it's still important.I have been wading the murky web waters for relevant material on this. Wikipedia has some of the more detailed and sane sounding information. I am tired of any linear progression of logic being called conspiracy. Are we just supposed to quit thinking or considering possibilities? The truth surrounding this matter is probably beyond anything the average person would care to speculate on. If it makes people more comfortable, maybe they can pretend they are thinking of a plot for a novel. The shift in responsibility takes away the guilt associated with actually having to put blame somewhere for awful things, God forbid. Try this one on for size. Superimpose Hick Berg's head over Adam Pearlman's. Same person?
24.130.27.26 22:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

message: deleting this article is absurd. it involves Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Benjamin Vanderford. this article has validity. if we're going to have Paul is Dead, we should have this article too. Kingturtle 06:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  this is absurd
Talk:Simple aromatic ring

message: Propose to move the content to new name: heteroarene because other arenes already covered in arene compounds. V8rik 22:02, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I absolutely disagree. Arene compounds redirects to aromatic hydrocarbon which also covers substituted aromatic hydrocarbons. There is the need to keep all basic aromatic systems in one place. I would instead suggest to move content from aromatic hydrocarbon here. While formally the term arene is correct, the term aromatic is way more common. Cacycle 00:49, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I have reverted your drastic and undiscussed changes to the article. Feel free to add the constructive parts from your edit back in. Cacycle 01:05, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I see this list only has items up to fused 6 membered rings.  I think Vetivazulene is aromatic with a seven member and five member ring fused together.Beakerboy 18:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vetivazulene

message: How is it that the table on the right contains compounds that are specifically ruled out by the mention of Hückel's law in the text on the left? Examples are benzocyclobutene (8 pi electrons), and pentalene (8 pi electrons). I'll proceed to eliminate them. — isilanes (talk|contribs) 19:35, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Benzocyclobutene is 6π, an sp3 link on benzene itself. But benzocyclobutadiene...it really is more like "6π aromatic benzene, with separate vinyl link on it", not a unified 8π precisely to avoid the antiaromaticity. Long-belated thanks for cleaning it up. DMacks (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antiaromatic compounds in table 

message: When is it appropriate to do the circle thing instead of showing double/single bonds? —Random832 19:24, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagrams 

message: It looks pretty cherry-picked. There are 5, 6, fused-5/6, fused-6/6, fused-6/6/6, some but not all heterocyclic possibilities, many that do but some that do not have their own articles. We need some criteria for inclusion and organization. DMacks (talk) 23:13, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion criteria for diagrams table
Talk:Sheldon Wolin

message: "Wolin’s well-deserved fame was etched in stone in 1960 with the publication of " ... biased POV?  I think so. Altering to fix  Ryanluck 22:03, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think this article is clearly not neutral. It makes an assertion without any references or sources. I don't have a lot of time to edit, but I'll try to correct this, perhaps by just removing the statement, or commenting it out pending someone providing an authoritative source. Calicocat (talk) 04:55, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality of article
File talk:Circumsised penis - Flacid and Erect - High Res.jpg

message: This images provides an illustration in several articles. Please discuss before censoring/changing.--Alex uk 86 22:08, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Censorship 

message: Auch ! 
That man is missing a piece of his penis !
poor guy =( —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Warniats (talk • contribs) 00:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Please refrain from adding useless comments on this talk page. Thank You for your understanding! --Siva1979Talk to me 05:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  auw 

message: Is this really a flaccid and erect? Looks like a semi-erection and an erection. Maybe the fellow is just a very heavy "shower" (flaccid is same size as erect). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 208.252.179.21 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And  he only has one!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.182.175.49 (talk) 04:18, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: Can we settle on one of the decent quality incarnations (of which the current one, being red-shifted, is not) and quit fucking with it, please? —überRegenbogen 07:43, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spastic revision
Talk:East of the Sun (Roy Harper album)

message: This page has been reverted to it's original state. This layout follows a standard format used for numerous other albums, both by this artist and others. Imposing your alterations is akin to vandalism. Please discuss further alterations here, prior to "cleaning up" other peoples hard work and contributions. Thank You. Stephenjh 22:19, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Marcus Atilius Regulus (consul 267 BC)

message: I think that it would be best if someone would check the note on Regulus's demise, which is ascribed to Horace. The Regulus Ode (III.5, which is correct) does not seem to mention anything specific about the form of death that awaits Regulus; the closest that I could find was "atque sciebat, quae sibi barbarus/ tortor pararet...", which would translate to something like "and [well] he knew what things for him his barbarous tormentor prepared".204.52.215.69 (talk) 23:15, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Horace and Regulus 

message: I try to clean up odd links, including bad and red links, that sort of thing, when I have time and inclination.  I don't know how (or if) to correct the competing links in this minor article.
This Wikipedia article on Marcus Atilius Regulus indexes him under Marcus.
Citations show that Encyclopædia Britannica 1911 is the source.  
Encyclopædia Britannica 1911 lists him in the index (volume 23, REFECTORY_to_SAINTE-BEUVE) as "Regulus, Marcus Atilius".  The EB 1911 link is .  
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/1911_Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica/Vol_23:1
There is also a link directly to the EB 1911 article; the Wikipedia link to the article is 
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Marcus-Atilius-Regulus
This discrepancy (indexed M vs R) causes an automatic response "" that I do not know how to fix -- especially because EB 1911 is probably correct to list the article under Regulus rather than under Marcus and Wiki admin probably should decide to where to make these changes.
Thanks in advance
GeeBee60 (talk) 14:40, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming convention (index Marcus or Regulus) 

message: I have noticed that some dates in the article concerning things Regulus has done are in the 1800's BC, this is plain impossible because of obvious reasons, I don't know the actual dates, but I thought I'd just point it out so someone who does can edit it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.195.251.194 (talk) 13:59, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: The infobox is a supplement to the article. See WP:INFOBOX. It should summarise what is said in the article. The article does not say where he died, nor can it. There are no sources as to where he died. The sources say only that he died in captivity. It is therefore not verifiable to assert that MAR died in Carthage, which is why I've reverted your edits to that effect.
The consulship is not an occupation. An occupation is a profession that one has, which one can do for prolonged periods of time. The consulship is a single year office that most people hold only once or twice. One cannot have the occupation of consul in the same way one cannot have the occupation of being born. Ifly6 (talk) 21:58, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disruptive edits to infobox
Talk:Broadgate Tower

message: this non notable tower is the tallest under construction in europes largest business district. very non notable ;)
Yeah, why this has been proposed for deletion is beyond me.
After all, there are already articles on buildings such as the 51 Lime Street, which is also under construction, but is considerably shorter (Jamandell (d69) 23:25, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Eddie Money (album)

message: I made in the info box as well as added the track listings and edited the text. I have yet to find who the drummer is he is not listed in the text where the others are, I plan on buying the album soon so Ill add it when I pick it up. If any one knows please add. CraigP 04:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Berkley High School

message: I am removing the fight song since I find no evidence of it online.  While it may exist it is doubtful.  Even if it did exist there could be copyright issues.  It is very prone to vandalism due to it's lack of verifiability.  Lastly I don't think it significant enough to be put into wikipedia. --Zudduz 13:04, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  fight song removal 

message: I removed "difficult" from the pieces written that the band has performed.  This is an opinion and does not belong on wikipedia.  Also, I removed the section about the orchestra being "one of the best in the area."  Again, this is an opinion and there is no evidence to back it up.  Is there proof of the choir goign to Carneige Hall?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.215.165 (talk) 03:20, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup of music groups 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Members/User WPMILHIST Military aviation task force

message: What do you think about modified version below with links moved to one line? Piotr Mikołajski 10:48, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  (Please feel free to make such cosmetic changes boldly in the future, incidentally! ;-) Kirill Lokshin 11:56, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Modified variant proposal
Talk:Bad Education (2004 film)

message: It was very pure heroin and not heroin cut with strychnine, wasn't it? --Zimbricchio 22:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Heroin