lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Economic dispatch

message: This article is related to economical dispatch of Electrical Power, and in no way to economics or finance. Please include this in the Electricity section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.61.160.253 (talk) 01:51, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Scope

message: The statement "the marginal costs of all generators are the same. That is the cost of producing one additional MWh is the same for every generator"  is not accurate.  Several factors come immediately to mind, the first being the efficiency of a given plant.  Each new generation of combustion turbine produces more MWhrs from a given quantity of natural gas, which tends to lower their marginal cost.  Another factor is the price of the fuel.  Not all plants pay the same price for fuel; not only will the spot price vary but also tariffs and taxes.  Plants which get their fuel cheaper will have a lower marginal cost.  The price of transmission to get one's power to market also varies.  The price of the electricity consumed by the plant (yes, it takes power to make power) will vary depending on where the plant is located, and if they purchase that power from the utility or "buy" it from themselves since they are generating it themselves. John D Gardner (talk) 23:19, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marginal Cost is not equal 

message: This page should have graphs of short-run marginal cost (SRMC) vs energy dispatched of generators (MW) to more readily understand the economic dispatch process.
Jamesray1 (talk) 23:08, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graphs of short-run marginal cost (SRMC) vs energy dispatched of generators (MW) 

message: Some recent references that may assist with this article.  With best wishes.  RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 10:46, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some references 

message: The following book is a useful reference on  the  traditional,  monopoly  utility, approach for electricity industry operation and control, however that it has become more common with market-based, restructured electricity markets:
Allen J Wood and BruceF Wollenberg, Power Generation, Operation and Control, Wiley, 2nd Edition, 1996. 
There's also a 3rd Edition
There's other useful resources, e.g.:
https://www.slideshare.net/HussainAli94/economic-dispatch-64543749 in the context of thermal power plants, although this isn't really citation worthy
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282901269_Economic_Dispatch_in_power_systems
Jamesray1 (talk) 23:08, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another reference 

message: If not how are they different please?Chidgk1 (talk) 17:44, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be merged with [[Merit order]]?
Talk:Presidential Scholars Program

message: This article is based on public-domain text from http://www.ed.gov/.
Which would explain why it's so poorly written :) Cheezmeister 22:37, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Public domain sourcing

message: Somebody keeps inserting the 2010 scholars -- all 150 of them -- into the article; possible self-promotion? Please stop. We can't include them all but can certainly link to the Department of Education website for complete lists of all scholars. Alien9542 (talk) 08:34, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at the IP's edit's, it seems possible that it's a series of self-promotional edits.  We'll know more if it continues TEDickey (talk) 10:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Ted. Would really appreciate your help here, as it’s borderline vandalism. Alien9542 (talk) 23:32, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm keeping an eye on it - have to follow the process TEDickey (talk) 23:37, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a process? We can't mark these all as abusive or something? :-\ Alien9542 (talk) 01:43, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Only for repetitions that are "frequent".  I see the editor's off on a new type of abuse though TEDickey (talk) 08:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That person may want to consider a sub-article, just a list.  Auchansa (talk) 04:35, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 2010 scholars
Talk:Zalman Teitelbaum

message: To 67.139.62.77- I've reverted the page. Please cite a source for your additions and change them to be less POV. ShalomShlomo 02:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Revert

message: Any relation to the Great Rabbi Leib (or Leiv), the head of the jewish court of cracow, in 1600's or around that time, (im not sure which century but long, long ago near 16,1700s) Rabbi Aryeh Leib the son of Shaul? Jan 8th, 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.33.195.170 (talk • contribs) 
:In both of these cases, Leib is a given name. Not a surname. -- -- --  23:43, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Relative?

message: The correct Wikipedia format for this article is Zalman Teitelbaum and not Zalman Leib Yekusiel Yehudah Teitelbaum. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)#Names: "...the article title should generally be the name by which the subject is most commonly known, the subject's full name should be given in the lead paragraph, if known." Thus the article about Fidel Castro is called Fidel Castro and not "Fidel Alejandro Castro Ruz" and the article about François Mitterrand is called François Mitterrand and not "Maurice Adrien Marie Mitterrand" and Bill Clinton is Bill Clinton on Wikipedia and not "William Jefferson 'Bill' Clinton (born William Jefferson Blythe III)" which is put in the opening paragraph but it's not the name of the article. IZAK 12:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He is commonly known as Zalman Leib, not Zalman, and the name of the page should reflect as much.--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 01:06, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: So why did you move the page from Zalman LeibTeitelbaum to Zalman Teitelbaum and not to Zalman Leib Teitelbaum? -- -- -- 21:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zalman Teitelbaum vs. Zalman Leib Yekusiel Yehudah Teitelbaum  

message: Article is ridiculously biased in favor of Ahron. Completely violating WP:NPOV. High Leader (talk) 05:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non neutral POV 
Talk:List of Harvard College freshman dormitories

message: I don't see why Canaday needs a separate page - must every dorm at every university have its own Wikipedia entry?  I doubt it.  Mass Hall is historically and architecturally significant, but the others can all be treated in as much detail as necessary on this page.  Bruxism 23:08, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canaday merger 

message: I lived on the first floor of Canaday 1978-9 and I think we should keep it separate.  Canaday is unique because it was built during an era of incredibly bad taste, and it is the only Stalinesque building in Harvard Yard.
must every dorm at every university have its own Wikipedia entry? 
Not at all, but Harvard dorms should.
168.224.1.14 15:02, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep separate 

message: Wow, that Titanic thing was a real bonanza for Harvard . 'Tis an ill wind that blows no man (or college) good. EEng (talk) 20:51, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titantic benefits 

message: Re  : My mistake. I was thinking of Clavicle Hall. It's the memory that goes first, you know. EEng (talk) 13:14, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apley 

message: There's a proposal to merge this list-article into a larger one to be created, List of Harvard residence houses and dormitories.  Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mather House (Harvard University).  The larger list-article could possibly be created by moving this one to the new title, then merging in info about 13 separate residence houses.  Comment at the discussion there, not here. --doncram 21:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  merger proposal to List of Harvard residence houses and dormitories 

message: Can someone please provide at least one image of Matthews?  It is by far the most interesting architecturally -- enough so to justify its own article (as the other (lesser) halls have), with several images.
BMJ-pdx (talk) 14:46, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need images of Matthews
Talk:Ntungamo District

message: If the districts in Uganda are named for the principle city was Museveni born in the city of Ntumgamo or in another city in the district? *Exeunt* Ganymead | Dialogue? 02:16, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Ntungamo is really not a city, its a small town, and the largest municipality in the district. That he was born in Ntungamo district is probably the closest we can get (someone has done good work figuring this out. See the footnote #2 in his article). It is often said that his father Amos Kaguta was a cattle keeper, so my guess is that he was born in a rural village somewhere in Ntungamo district.--Ezeu 02:46, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Museveni's birthplace
Talk:San José de Suaita

message: :Wikipedia is not a photo album Wikicrusader 02:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Wikicrusader, you should delete some pictures. We all fall into temptation when lots of pictures are available, but this is no good for wikipedia. Think of the article and which pictures are relevant. Javiery 27 July 2006
All suggest has been made as you recommend. I delete many pictures from this article. I just hope you had seen it. --201.245.242.138 15:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Is it a new word ? San José de Suaita#People.
:Regards. --Doalex (talk) 18:41, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  French-saxon
Talk:Duke of Aquitaine

message: I have tried to make a sensical listing of the Merovingian dukes.  But it is almost certainly wrong and I have no good dates.  Boggis (son of Charibert) died in 688.  Hubert was his son.  It is said that Hubert resigned the throne to a brother named Boggis.  Elsewhere this brother is Odo the Great.  Who then is Lupus I? When did Hubert abdicate and when did Odo begin his reign?  Srnec 02:20, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Found one at heraldica.org from the 18th century, but that's probably it. Choess 16:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Question: The numbering of the Plantagenet Dukes of Aquitaine seems off. For Henrys II and III of England the numbers are listed as II and III, but later in the article Henry IV is referred to as Henry III and Henry V is referred to as Henry IV. I'm not sure if this is an error or if the numbering scheme for the Henrys is different in England vis-a-vis Aquitaine (that might make sense since Henry I of England was never Duke of Aquitaine). Regardless, the numbering is inconsistent and ought to be fixed by someone who knows this better than I. (May 11, 2009)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.6.226.97 (talk) 06:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I renumbered the Henrys as IV and V, for consistency with the succeeding text.  Anyone knowing their numbering (if any) as Dukes or Lords can fix it, if necessary. Zaslav (talk) 05:25, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

text: thanks Zaslav, I do agree it is kind of confusing when the crown and the duchy doesn’t join. As King Henry I wasn’t a duke, the numbers of the kings and of the dukes are in a offset. This also happened during the reigns of King James I and II when the English crown succession joint with the Scottish one. SkinnyboiYeet (talk) 23:46, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: The Henrys

message: What's the surface area of the Duchy of Aquitaine, using this map, in 1154 (in km2/mi2)?  137.254.4.5 (talk) 19:14, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surface Area
Talk:Cisco Catalyst

message: I saw the merge-proposal for Cisco Stackwise. Imho Stackwise is just a feature in a line of Catalyst switches and doesn't need its own article; and even if it would: the Q of the original article is not meetig Wiki standards.
Therefore did a quick merge ad redird the old link.JanT (talk) 07:02, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging Stackwise 

message: Just updating version 12.2(33)to SXJ and mentioning the 15.1.1  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chigibby (talk • contribs) 23:57, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Versions 

message: It would be nice to specify the date of the "to date". Why? It seems that it is up till now, but the today date is advancing everyday, and some of these "to date" may be untrue already. 193.219.179.254 (talk) 09:06, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I assume we're talking about the "No EoL notices to date" entries. We could just change those to "No EoL notices". That might address your concern. It doesn't keep time from advancing though. ~Kvng (talk) 14:56, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

text: These model lists are getting far out of date (already marked as such) earlier this year. We were down to a single "No EoL notices announced to date" entry. I have removed that because I assume I might find one were I to look. ~Kvng (talk) 19:14, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  ... to date
Talk:John K. Singlaub

message: Singlaub is a very controversial person but nothing of his controversial or questionable activities appear in the article. Formeruser-82 02:21, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Post-retirement:  The general writes about his own involvement in the search for Yamashita's Gold in his book "Hazardous Duty."  He gives credibility to several of the key facts and documentation, which he examined persoanlly.  He actually took over as supervisor of the search operations in the Philippines at one point.  He references several key names who were involved.  This information would be appropriate in this article, with cross-links to the Wikipedia article on Yamashita's Gold. Starhistory22 (talk) 06:45, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yamashita's gold
Talk:Opha May Johnson

message: USMC allowed women to fight in WW2? On what planet?  Trekphiler 02:22, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: They didn't "fight" they "served in combat zones."  Like as nurses and other jobs.  On this planet actually (earth).  Chexmix53 (talk) 23:13, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good to see that was so clear I needed to ask. And that it took 30 mo to get a rise out of you.  TREKphiler 00:02, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fighting women

message: :: (moved here from article text) tedder (talk) 19:48, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Enlistment date

message: Date of birth is questionable.  I don't believe Opha Mae Johnson was 40 years old when she enlisted.  Most Marine Corps histories list her date of birth as Feb 13 1900 and death as January ? 1976.  http://www.lejeune.marines.mil/PublicAffairs/News/ArticleView/tabid/1108/Article/4082/womens-history-program-strikes-rich-historical-cord-at-camp-lejeune.aspx
According to the 1900 United States Federal Census, Opha May Johnson (nee Jacob) was born in May 1879 - she was 38 years of age when she enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve. She married Victor Hugo Johnson on December 19,1898 in Washington, D.C. (District of Columbia, Select Marriages, 1830-1921.
The picture is clearly not that of an 18 year old, and is captioned as being taken shortly after her enlistment.  It is interesting to note that she was 76 years old when she died and, given the 1900 birth year erroneously attributed, that would explain the year of death as being 1976.  I ask you though, if the first ever women Marine died as late as 1976, her death would have been published in every major newspaper.  As it is, her gravesite was only recently (Sept 2014) cataloged, and remains unmarked.  I have sent that link to the Women Marines Association, in the hope they will rectify at least that.  I also plan to contact the Historical Division in Quantico to verify my belief that is the correct Opha May Johnson.--KMJKWhite (talk) 04:39, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth 

message: Per the The Marine Corps history division, her middle name is MAY not Mae. She even signed it that way on her enlistment contract. You can see the photo of the contract at the Marine Corps History Division Facebook Page https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=407005622650159&set=a.367850739898981.107284.365367730147282&type=1&theater  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.115.10 (talk) 03:27, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Middle Name Spelling 

message: Per:  http://ia700802.us.archive.org/3/items/WomenMarinesInWorldWarI/Women%20Marines%20In%20World%20War%20I.pdf  picture is available from National Archives (NatArch RG 127G Photo 515829).
68.5.61.251 (talk) 23:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo
Talk:Pieces of April

message: I removed the date the film was shown at Sundance as the release date, since I'm certain this date is supposed to reflect when the film went into commercial release for the paying public. Also, I removed Mandarin as the film's language, as I'm certain this pertains to the primary language spoken in the film. The fact one or two characters speak a few lines of dialogue in a language other than English in a primarily English-language film doesn't need to be noted in the infobox; it mistakenly leads the reader to believe the other language was a major element in the film. MovieMadness (talk) 13:47, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox edits 

message: 1) To me it should be called a trajic comedie, because playing stil and story are built upon this categorie.
2) The two lines which are acted on, the family homerun and the neigbours cooking for thanksgiving are well strained up.
3) The heavy themes  mother Joy's cancer and April generally not being loved as a daughter, not being able to cook,Bobby not finding a right suite and living
in a strange neighborhood are so told, that the figures are real, their trajic is serious and we are fullfilled to have the chance to laugh about them. It#s a good directing distance in. Camera does little but finest work! Nobody burns instead of a (cool) turkey.
The hidden frames imply such opportunities. Happy ends like this, mean real love. Do little and it#s great! At home planet earth.--Danaide (talk) 16:44, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Format or film class?!
Talk:I Saw Such Things in My Sleep EP

message: any indie band can use wikipedia to get exposure. Unless the band has done something that is valuable enough for an encyclopedic entry, they shouldn't be listed. delete. — JIP | Talk 09:04, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Global Network Navigator

message: How much was GNN sold to AOL for?  It says it was one of the first big transactions of the internet era but no details are given or supporting references.  --70.48.240.24 02:29, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: $11 million; see third bullet, next section.  -- John Broughton   (♫♫) 18:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Price 

message: *Mention in Forbes article, February 2009: http://www.forbes.com/2009/02/22/kindle-oreilly-ebooks-technology-breakthroughs_oreilly.html
*CNET, 2006: http://news.cnet.com/GNN-tries-to-get-hip-with-new-show/2100-1023_3-216792.html
*Sale, 2005: http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=SA&p_theme=sa&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EAFECC5F208CD49&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM
* Best of the net award: http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=SA&p_theme=sa&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EAFECC5F208CD49&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM (and http://docs.newsbank.com/g/GooglePM/PG/lib00052,0EADF8B5EECAB6AB.html )
* January 2006 relaunch: http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_product=PD&s_site=twincities&p_multi=SP&p_theme=realcities&p_action=search&p_maxdocs=200&p_topdoc=1&p_text_direct-0=0EB5DFEDC5575E9B&p_field_direct-0=document_id&p_perpage=10&p_sort=YMD_date:D&s_trackval=GooglePM 
* AOL and GNN split with regard to browsers: http://news.cnet.com/AOL-goes-for-Explorer-after-all/2100-1023_3-207258.html
-- John Broughton   (♫♫) 18:04, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should be incorporated 

message: Advertising was a bit controversial, and, of course, breaking new ground. Bits and pieces I've found that might be incorporated into the article, related to that:
* Usenet newsgroup announcement, August 25, 1993
* Wall Street Journal article, August 27, 1993, "Internet to Get Hit with Ad Clutter" (not available via Google News or Web search]
*October 1993 update, including Tim O'Reilly's response to WSJ article.
Also:
* October 1994 email newsletter to subscribers
-- John Broughton   (♫♫) 16:08, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising 
Talk:Zuhr prayer

message: There seems to be a mistake regarding the Sunni time for the Dhurh Salat. According to Sunnis, the time ends when the time for Asr begins, which differs depending on which madhab one is following. As far as I can understand, the Shia view is the same.  Thus there is no reason for different sections.  Pepsidrinka 02:31, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

message: According to WP:MOS, in the case of a stylistic disagreement where both sides have a case, the article should revert to the style used by the first major contributor: ie: Ahadith.
I'm not going to go back and re-flip all these articles, this is a minor point.  Both spellings are correct.  But I would point out the hadith article itself asserts ahadith to be the plural, which is apparently consistent with Arabic usage.  
Further, as a matter of principle, we are living in a world of borrowed Arabic words here in the Islamic portal, and these questions will never be settled properly.  When an editor discovers there is more than one acceptable spelling for a word, the editor should defer to the original contributor.  While I will not further belabor the case in point, I will continue to support the underlying principle.
Regards,
Aquib (talk) 16:00, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia:MOS#Stability_of_articles 

message: Zuhr prayer is the second prayer of the day's progression of prayers, not the fourth, which is spelled incorrectly in the article as well.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 8.36.254.65 (talk) 01:48, 5 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zuhr prayer mentioned as "forth" prayer?