lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cathexis (Star Trek: Voyager)

message: Stop changing the episode numbers because you watched this on Netflix, Netflix is not the owner. Netflix lists all episodes as (n), but the makers and current owner CBS lists all episodes as (n+1), because the first episode is considered as episode 1 & 2. CptBearguy (talk) 20:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode & production numbers
Talk:Central Bank of the Congo

message: It seems like this article would be more aptly named Central Bank of Congo with a redirect from Banque Centrale du Congo. Jonemerson 06:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of indoor volleyball world title winners

message: Generally,  Volleyball World League and  Volleyball Grand Prix Titles' Winners are not considered as World Champions of Indoor Volleyball. (Both are commercial competitions only!) 198.155.145.88 06:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: While all that may be true, this page is a list of "title winners" not "World Champions". The World League and World Grand Prix are definitely titles, so I will revert --Pak21 08:13, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification of winners 

message: I suggest this page and List of Indoor Volleyball World Medalists be merged into one page, the other page contains more content but this one's name is better. You can see that some of the pages that are linked with this page in other languages have the same content as List of Indoor Volleyball World Medalists. Tomcat313 (talk) 06:30, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Decacarbonyldihydridotriosmium

message: This was created as a group project for Inorganic Chemistry, Chemistry 312, taught at the University of Illinois in Urbana-Champaign.
*removed this text from front page and placed it here. Cantras 06:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I was trying to clean up the citation, but I can't find page 367 from the volume webpage: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/bookhome/114036251. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 16:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference?
Talk:Masaaki Tachihara

message: I do not see Tachihara's name or any of his aliases or the stories that allegedly won on the Akutagawa Prize official list at the website of the magazine that gives it out (http://www.bunshun.co.jp/award/akutagawa/list1.htm)
Also corroborating the fact that he did not win is that Lee Hoesung was the first Korean winner of the prize in 1972, and the second Korean winner did not come until 1988 (Lee Yangji), by which time Tachihara was already deceased. I believe the confusion is arising because he was only nominated for the prize, but did not actually receive it; see  cab 06:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: These issues have been resolved in a later revision --MChew 06:07, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Old Discussion
Talk:Query and Echo

message: There's barely enough here to warrant an article. I mean it even states "Very little is known about Query and Echo, since their appearance in comics and any other media is limited". This seems like an easy merge to me, but I'll leave this here if anyone wants to discuss it. AniMate 22:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Encapsulation

message: Swapped 'Information Hiding' and 'Seperation of Concerns' to demonstrate the idea that it generally more specifically refers to Seperation of Concerns (and because my students keep looking stuff up on Wikipedia and just clicking the first link on the Disambiguation page, which is leading them astray).  -- TLarson 71.244.5.133 06:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Robert J. Gordon

message: Can someone find a specific reference for this?  I don't doubt it, but it would be useful to have links to papers, books, etc he's written that support it.  A lot might be in his recent Rise and2016) Fall of American Growth (2016) Jimw338 (talk) 18:15, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference for "questions the actual productivity of [computer technology in the economic growth]"
Talk:Chinstrap penguin

message: While it is good to have the male-male penguin relationship note... is it really necessary to include the whole Daily Show segment? That sort of thing is not really that useful in a wikipedia entry.
71.170.24.75 06:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Male-Male Penguin Relationships

message: hello! i love penguins  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.56.3.82 (talk) 17:19, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  penguins 

message: Out of curiousity, I followed the link in the article to Peter Island. The linked article refers to an island in the Caribbean: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Island
I assume there should be a disambiguation link, and that the Peter Island referred to in the Chinstrap Penguin article is not the one described in the linked article?
76.124.76.174 (talk) 18:43, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Peter Island confusion

message: It would be nice to have more information about the colonies they form. there is little information on the size, frequency, etc of the colonies. also, there is little more than a passing mention of the creches they form. 70.36.136.89 (talk) 23:00, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colonies 

message: Hi, the reference number 3: " "Chinstrap Penguin Fact Sheet". Lincoln Park Zoo." is broken. I will delete it. --JuanToño (talk) 18:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored it and added an archived link. Rhinopias (talk) 04:29, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference Broken 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File: will be appearing as picture of the day on December 27, 2019. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2019-12-27. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:54, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:{{Remove file prefix|South Shetland-2016-Deception Island–Chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica) 04.jpg}}]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Sīkrags

message: Why is this article hidden away so that it is less likely to be found because there is no redirect from the English alphabet spelling without diacritics? Or from any of the many other names listed in the intro?  Gene Nygaard 06:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: links are as followed: Sīkrags (Sikrags), Sīkraga (Sikraga), Sikraguciems, Sikrag, Sīkraguciems, Sikraga, Sikragutsiyems--Estopedist1 (talk) 14:12, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing redirects
Talk:Keith Ellison, Dennis Prager, and the Oath on the Quran

message: - Can anyone provide a link where Ellision has said he would be sworn in on the Koran prior to Prager writing his column? 24.82.91.241 07:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Where did Prager get information?

message: This article is good and detailed but it wouldn't get in any encyclopaedia. It's more like the sort of reportage one sees in current affairs magazines - not quite detached enough. Also, I'm not sure about the title. Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 09:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the lead paragraph is a big problem. The first sentence isn't a proper sentence at all, for one thing, and there's an irritating assumption that everyone will know the article is referring to the U.S. I've specified United States Congress (it's not the only Congress in the world!) but I agree with you; this is more like a newspaper article or an essay than an encyclopedia one. The title is pretty terrible, too: is there an "accepted" way of referring to this event? If so, use it. Loganberry (Talk) 12:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Congressional oath controversy, 2006? Fys. “Ta fys aym”. 21:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

text: “News style - Some Wikipedians advocate using a news style. News style is the prose style of short, front-page newspaper stories and the news bulletins that air on radio and television. It encompasses not only vocabulary and sentence structure, but the order in which stories present information, their tone and the readers or interests to which they cater. Encyclopedia articles do not have to follow news style, but a familiarity with the conventions may be a great help in planning the style and layout of an article.”
If as you say "this is more like a newspaper article" isn't that what the standards are promoting as good wiki-page writing?--Wowaconia 15:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Encyclopaedic tone 

message: It seems fairly POV to devote an entire section to "Noted Conservatives Respond", especially in the absence of a similar section with "Noted Progressives Respond". I'm not suggesting the latter be added, but I think a section with the response from public figures of various political leanings, rather than the current focus on conservatives, would help the article appear more neutral. As it stands, it comes off somewhat like the project of someone who restricts him or herself strictly to right-wing information sources. Which is an individual's prerogative, certainly, but isn't very conducive to NPOV. -- John Callender 21:39, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Noted conservatives respond?
File talk:FA-star-India.png

message: Hi,
I don't know who created this image. It is good ,but I feel a star is too commonplace to feel "Indian"
Probably half the flags in the world have a star. Again saffron and green are not unique to India. there are two -three similar flags.
The Chakra is uniquely Indian, no other national flag or emblem(as far as I know ) has any equivalent.
I feel it could be used in place of the FA-Star-India.
I don't know who takes this decision. Perhaps the artist may want to change the FA-star-India and put a Chakra in the middle.
Can someone enlighten me?
Deepak D'Souza 07:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Dekada '70 (novel)

message: Since Dekada 70 refers to both the movie and the book---which, in its own right, is notable (it was a Palanca grand prize winner and, I think, was even banned by President Marcos)---shouldn't the book also have its own article? Or, if possible, would it also be good if the Dekada 70 article discusses both? This could be interesting, because this is one of the rare Filipino films that are based on a book (like, say, The Lord of the Rings trilogy). --- Tito Pao 18:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea. Hopefully somebody can get to it. We'll see. --Pinay06 10:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about the book? 

message: Dekada 70 needs to be moved/merged with Dekada '70 which is the correct title for both Dekada '70 novel and film both dealt by the article. Thank you! --Pinay06 08:16, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging [[Dekada 70]] with [[Dekada '70]]

message: Please post ideas here: 
* Yes, I am for the split. The merged article is long enough already. The split will give more room for presenting the inherent merits of each. --Pinay06(Talk•Email) 09:06, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  splitting [[Dekada '70 (film)]] and [[Dekada '70 (novel)]] 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 22:11, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Mandats territoriaux

message: Why the proposed merge? The article makes clear that these were distinct from assignats. - Jmabel | Talk 07:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?

message: It would be nice to mention a source for the given information. ----130.83.117.163 (talk) 15:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source
Talk:Proper map

message: The statement
*If f : X → Y is a proper continuous map and Y is a compactly generated Hausdorff space then f is closed.
is one I proved myself. I'm not aware of a reference, but surely one exists. At any rate, it is an improvement over the prior version (which had first-countable in place of CGHaus) both in generality and correctness (the Hausdorff condition is necessary here). -- Fropuff 07:15, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Caveat emptor

message: "An equivalent, possibly more intuitive definition is as follows: we say an infinite sequence of points {pi} in a topological space X escapes to infinity if, for every compact set S ⊂ X only finitely many points pi are in S. Then a map f : X → Y is proper if and only if for every sequence of points {pi} that escapes to infinity in X, {f(pi)} escapes to infinity in Y."
I'm pretty sure this is only true in a metric space.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.161.2.95 (talk) 03:17, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Equivalent conditions

message: The proof does not seem to use any of the extra assumptions about X or Y (I'm not sure which ones it is supposed to use, as the rest is chaotic...), and it also looks dead wrong to me: in the last passage, it uses f^{-1}(\cup_{i=1}^s V_{k_i}) \subset \cup_{\lambda \in \Gamma} U_{\lambda}, when in fact the opposite inclusion is true, I think (at any rate, the inclusion is not justified).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.99.27.160 (talk) 03:22, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "proof of the fact"
Talk:The Queen's Medical Center

message: When did the Queen's Hospital become the Queen's Medical Center? -- MidnightSoldier (talk) 17:23, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: In 1967.(Kanahele 1999, p. 105) Viriditas (talk) 23:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change?
Talk:Princess Elisabeth of Hesse and by Rhine (1895–1903)

message: Is the 'house table' at the end of this article relevant to this girl?  She is not included in it.  In anyh case, the house table does not look right.  How can a 'house' have a birth and death year.  Hmains 19:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  House table 

message: #Well-written: Pass
#Factually accurate: Pass 
#Broad: Pass 
#Neutrally written: Pass
#Stable: Pass 
#Well-referenced: Pass
#Images: Pass
Congratulations!  I was going to comment on a few things I found annoying, such as the use of the nicknames of her parents constantly, rather than their real names (or even pronouns), but I decided just to change it myself.  While this referencing style isn't very common on WP, it fits rather well here, and is an acceptable style in any case.  As such a minor figure in history, I doubt that you could find any other sources on her, but it would be preferable if at least one more could be found.  In any case, well done.  --PresN 16:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  GAC 

message: This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. There are however one problem with the article which should be addressed.
*The lead is very short and should be extended to two paragraphs which give a clear picture of the princess and her life. At the moment the lead conspiculouly fails to provide an adequate introduction.
The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, --Jackyd101 (talk) 23:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Sweeps

message: 16 November 1903
* Knodt, Manfred: Ernst Ludwig, Großherzog von Hessen und bei Rhein : Sein Leben und seine Zeit. Darmstadt : Schlapp, 1978. – , S. 12.
* Harald Sandner: Coburg im 20. Jahrhundert. Die Chronik über die Stadt Coburg und das Haus Sachsen-Coburg und Gotha vom 1. Januar 1900 bis zum 31. Dezember 1999 – von der „guten alten Zeit“ bis zur Schwelle des 21. Jahrhunderts. Gegen das Vergessen. Verlagsanstalt Neue Presse, Coburg 2002, , S. 34
* http://www8.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/cgi-bin/stoyan/l1/LANG=germ/INDEX=I130950
* http://daten.digitale-sammlungen.de/~db/bsb00001141/images/index.html?seite=1211&pdfseitex=
--188.99.88.83 (talk) 20:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  day of death 

message: I don’t see the point in changing the names of these people to English versions in this day and age. Ernst Ludwig was the name of the father as he was a German prince. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 02:49, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names
Talk:List of hospitals in Hawaii

message: I made some changes to the page, added references, images, and details on some hospitals.   There should probably be articles on the largest hospitals on each Island, given there is sufficient sourcing.  It would be nice to have pictures of more of the hospitals if anyone one the islands would like to contribute.  Let me know if there are hospitals missing.  This page should also contain the Psychiatric hospitals.  I believe that Kahi Mohala Behavioral Health, 91-2301 Old Fort Weaver Road in Ewa Beach is missing.  What about Hale Ho'ola Hamakua
45-547 Plumeria Street, Honoka'a, on the Big Island?
  13:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Changes
Talk:Donburi

message: Oyakodon, chicken & egg over rice in a bowl, was invented by the Tamahide restaurant in Ningyocho, Tokyo, in business since the Edo Period and still very popular, with waiting lines at lunchtime and a pricy menu at night. Trapani 21:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Oyakodon

message: The template for rice dishes appears to have a formatting issue on this page. When I view it, it extends several pages to the right. If someone can confirm this or better solve this issue, that would be appreciated. 23.16.246.34 (talk) 12:03, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it was a whitespace issue.  Should be better now.  Thanks for pointing this out. — Myasuda (talk) 12:48, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Template Issue

message: Tendon is a variety of donburi. I don't see why tendon needs its own page, as there isn't much to be said about it. I think it should be merged into donburi. If it ever gets to the point where there is enough content for its own article, then we can spin it off. Tchaliburton (talk) 05:41, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Tendon (Japanese cuisine)]] 

message: Isn't Donburi usually (always?) presented in a single-serving bowl?  And as a one-dish meal (with some pickle sides)?Penelope Gordon (talk) 06:42, 15 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Donburi portion size 

message: "Not traditionally Japanese or Chinese, the hybrid dish indicates the popularity of donburi in Japan."
I removed this from the lead as I can make no sense of what it is referring to. What hybrid dish? Why does it indicate popularity and what does China have to do with it? Rmhermen (talk) 22:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Odd sentence
Talk:Bamban

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this subsection with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
* Support per updated WP:MOSPHIL. Also in accordance with move requests before, from Talk:Cagdianao and Talk:Baliuag to Talk:Aparri and Talk:Sagada. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:13, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Kishore Vaigyanik Protsahan Yojana

message: Wikipedia is not a service for advertising.  Blatant advertisements can be removed as SPAM.  It is not encyclopedic to include contact information in the article.  Please check WP:PROMOTION.  This article is also POV. Rmosler | ●  14:29, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement 

message: I would like to beg to differ as it is a Governmental Orgainsation under the Governement of India. It is a non-profit organisation and serves to encourage students to take reserch carrer. "Kishore Vaigyanik Protsahan Yogana" is a Hindi (language) sentence which means, "Commitee to encourage intelligent students to become scientists.
Also, I am the prime contributor to the article and I have taken it completely as it is from the official website of the Organisation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Poddarrishabh (talk • contribs) 11:24, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:NOTDIR  "Contact information such as phone numbers, fax numbers and email addresses are not encyclopedic." In addition wholesale taking of material from another site may be considered plagiarism, unless there is express permission from the copyright holder.  Either way, this article reads as a promotional piece and could be well argued as being POV, especially if it was taken wholesale from a promotional site.  It does not matter if it is a governmental organization or not.  Encyclopedias do not promote organizations.  Make sure you read through WP:SPAM as it provides good direction as to what is, and is not considered spam. Rmosler | ●  07:17, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not an advertisement
Talk:Kabayaki

message: should the caption under the painting have "eel" instead of "eal"? --2607:FEA8:FF01:79BF:1530:3D95:BCEC:CD35 (talk) 02:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Eal" kabayaki? 

message: The picture of kabayaki on a plate says skewer holes are visible, but it looks like the skewers are visible, not the holes. --2607:FEA8:FF01:79BF:1530:3D95:BCEC:CD35 (talk) 02:09, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "skewer holes"?
Talk:Batasang Pambansa (legislature)

message: We should split this to Batasang Pambansa (building) and Batasang Pambansa (parliament). --Howard the Duck 11:11, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 
Talk:Mactan

message: From WP:RM:
*:Mactan Island → :Mactan —()— historically significant islands such Corregidor and Boracay do not yuse the word island in their names. —23prootie 07:35, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Incomplete. Dekimasuよ! 09:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Articles in the disambiguation are about something on the island and :Mactan (disambiguation) should be used on the disambiguation page.23prootie 20:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

text: There is no need for a disambiguation page to have a title ending in " (disambiguation)". That is only necessary when the page without that ending is already occupied by another article. --Stemonitis 20:56, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine, but why is the disambiguation nescessary when all articles in it are about something directly related to Mactan (the island). Besides, major islands in the Philippines do not use the word "island" in their names unless there is an associated city, town or province (i.e. Luzon, Mindanao, Boracay, Corregidor, Cebu (island), Samar (island))--23prootie 07:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move request

message: Opon was the original name of Mactan Island. The Americans coined the name Mactan when they opened the airbase sometime in the 60s. So it is wrong to say the "battle of Mactan" when you refer to the skirmish between the natives of Opon and Ferdinand Magellan's men in 1521 where he was killed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.153.183.166 (talk) 17:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The original name of Mactan island.