lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Robert Irsay

message: I moved these comments from the article to here. --Rogerd 00:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Robert Irsay was not a stingy man.  I worked for Robert Irsay directly for 12 years and for his company another 13 years after he left the company.  He was a tough and exciting man to work for but he was generous to those who were hard working and loyal to him.   65.99.136.99 23:18, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments from former employees

message: I put the NPOV tag on the page mainly because of the section In Defense of Robert Irsay. The section is very POV. The facts in the section can be rewritten to be NPOV.Qutezuce 23:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Anybody have a source of Irsay's drunken tirade at Baltimore Sun reporters as he got off a plane from Phoenix at BWI, claiming he hadn't been in Arizona? - Scooter 18:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "I haven't been in Arizona!" 

message: Wow, this must be one of the worst-written articles I've seen in a while. Anyone give any thoughts to actually sourcing the inflammatory and biased statements in this piece? Such as:
Thus, many Baltimore Colts fans awoke to the stunning news that they no longer had a football team. Robert Irsay, who had a reputation in the city for being stingy and temperamental to begin with, was further excoriated by the Baltimore press and many fans as a coward and a Judas.
Block quote
or
According to associates, Robert Irsay seemed to change with the new environment. He became friendlier and more community-minded, donating to local charities. And even the strained relationship between Irsay and his son, Jim (the former president of the Indianapolis Colts,) seemed to warm a great deal.
--Bigbadkeeper 14:41, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources? Quality of article? 
Talk:Stickler syndrome

message: The proposed merge sounds good to me. "Stickler syndrome" gets many more hits than "Stickler's Syndrome". Edwardian 00:17, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.. Felsir 07:02, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Spell pig backwords haha. --Arcadian 14:00, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge header
Talk:Supermanifold

message: There seem to be numerous different definitions of supermanifolds in the literature. It would be useful if this article could give an overview of all the different definitions (with references) and reasons why some may be preferred over others. The field seems young enough that perhaps Wikipedia shouldn't pick out one definition as the correct one. -- Fropuff 00:24, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  different definitions

message: supermanifolds together with their maps form a category. Hence the morphisms between them really matters and should be stated in the article as well...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mircomaster (talk • contribs) 12:05, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about the morphisms? 

message: I am removing this comment, which has been in the article since it's very creation:
:Side comment
:This is different from the alternative definition where, using a fixed Grassmann algebra  Λ generated by a countable number of generators, one defines a supermanifold as a point set space using charts with the "even coordinates" taking values in the linear combination of elements of Λ with even grading and the "odd coordinates" taking values which are linear combinations of elements of Λ with odd grading. This raises the question of the physical meaning of all these Grassmann-valued variables. Many physicists claim that they have none and that they are purely formal; if this is the case, this may make the definition in the main part of the article preferable.
I'm removing it because it doesn't make sense. The only definition I know of that makes sense is that in Bryce DeWitts book "Supermanifolds", and, from what I can tell, the above paragraph seems to be describing a one-dimensional superspace. To the best of my knowledge, this si not used anywhere in any textbook I know of.  So I'm just removing it as some kind of old cruft that doesn't quite really make sense.  67.198.37.16 (talk) 03:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh. I think I just now understood what that was trying to say. I wrote a section that now says that, but in a more concrete and direct way. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 04:20, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove oddball comment
Talk:Zendrum

message: Andy moore 00:27, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: On the other hand, I'm willing to bet that Wikipedia will be around longer than the Zendrum company. David McCabe 01:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

message: There's some kind of weird loop going on here.  This article references the "Drumitar", but all attempts to access the Drumitar article redirect back here.  Indeed, I got here in the first place while looking for information on the Drumitar.
This "Zendrum" is definitely NOT the Drumitar invented by Roy Wooten.
Is there no separate article on the actual Drumitar?  If not, there needs to be one.
Any discussion of the Zendrum/Drumitar needs to include the SynthAxe upon which it is based.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:558:6016:33:78CD:ADFA:488A:A536 (talk) 17:46, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infinite Loop?
Talk:Natasha Andersen

message: The first draft of this article was created by a user using an anonymous IP address which has been associated with a pattern of vandalism.  Will someone please verify the contents of this article?  If not verified in a reasonable amount of time, this article might have to be nominated for deletion.  Thanks.  Rossami (talk) 00:28, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Verification?
Talk:Latitude (building)

message: FYI - The Latitude tower primarily houses Ernst & Young, AAPT, Telecom New Zealand and Gen-i employees. Anecdotally we refer to the tower as "The Latitude Building", rather than it's formal name.— Preceding unsigned comment added by  168.140.181.4   (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Discrete modelling

message: Everyone.  I don't know why I took so long to look at this page on WP.  I'm going to start adding research topics, definitions, and modern application of discrete modeling.  Please feel bold to add other information onto this article.  I might not start defining everything well for another couple of weeks.  Finals are coming up, and that is not leaving me a lot of time to work on WP. Infonation101 (talk) 19:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Expansion
Talk:Lists of film spin-offs

message: I do approve of limited merging, but NOT of the triple merge proposed with both List of films made into television programs and List of TV shows made into films. For one thing, List of films made into television programs is categorized with Series and spin-offs at the Lists of films page, while List of TV shows made into films is categorized with By source at the Lists of films page.
I suggest instead that List of film spin-offs be replaced with a disambiguation page that points to both List of films made into television programs and List of TV shows made into films, and has its relevant content merged into those two respective articles, but NOT with those two articles merged with each other on top of everything.Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 17:06, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Cream cheese

message: Iam create wikipedia cream cheese arabic edition but I don't know add to languages entries Hihuys (talk) 20:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Languages 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ddrobine (talk) 18:40, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Information Literacy and Scholarly Discourse-2002
Talk:Mata Utu

message: Matâ'Utu or Mata-Utu?
Matâ'Utu is the way that Wallisians spell it, and since it is their capital, you'd think they'd know how to spell it. Sometimes its written Matâ'utu also. The French spell it Mata-Utu, but they also spell London as Londres, Edinburgh as Édimbourg and French Guiana as Guyane française. --Bob 01:07, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting, although I believe French is the official language of Wallis and Futuna, so officially it should be Mata-Utu. Anyway, I've seen both Mata-Utu and Matâ'Utu (or Mata'Utu without the accent). Which one is more commonly used? According to Wikipedia:Naming conventions, this should take precedence over how the natives call the city (e.g. Rome vs Roma). Chanheigeorge 04:42, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Mata-Utu is the English spelling, check for instance . So I am moving the article back to Mata-Utu. On Wikipedia we use English spellings, even when native names are different. For instance we have a Munich article, although Germans actually call it München. Hardouin 23:54, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling 

message: Damn ... we missed a better way to word the hook.
* ... that in Mata-Utu, capital city of Wallis and Futuna, the streets have no name?
Daniel Case (talk) 19:48, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The DYK hook that could have been ...
Talk:Patty Murray

message: This is mentioned in her opponents in the election. No article about it and Google brings up nothing. 156.209.224.208 (talk) 09:37, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Its just what that particular candidate listed as his party on the ballot. He said something along the lines of “jfk’s values alight best with the Republican Party of today.” 50.34.203.60 (talk) 19:22, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is a JFK Republican? 

message: Maybe, we could mention that Murray was 'second' in the presidential line of succession, from January 3 to 7, 2023? GoodDay (talk) 09:01, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second-in-line, 3-7 January 2023 

message: for Patrick Leahy and Robert Byrd, President pro Tempore comes after their office as senator, but in this page, it comes before?
in the wikibox. Tildin (talk) 08:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  template formatting, President Pro Tempore?
Talk:Antoinette Frank

message: I can't be the only one who finds:
"Other work Convicted of 3 counts of first-degree murder "
a bit cheeky?
128.172.27.159 (talk) 18:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added information as to the murders from State v. Frank 803 So.2d 1 La.,2001 (Jan 17, 20010. Nolamgm 00:54, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: Although I did not make the change, according to the Orleans Parish Criminal Sheriff's Office , Frank's date of birth is April 30, 1970. Nolamgm 22:48, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Birth

message: Written Readers-Digest style
116.71.60.141 (talk) 22:02, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too Dramatic 

message: Ronald A. Williams II should really be merged to this article. Wikipedia is not a memorial for fallen officers and the majority of the article talks about the murder/restaurant robbery, which is already covered in this article. We do not have articles on the other two victims, so why should he have one? 69.118.35.133 (talk) 13:03, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. The particularly notable part of the article is the criminal behavior of Frank. MartinezMD (talk) 14:00, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: This article is weird. there's nothing about Frank's early Life, psychologically and sexually abusive father, or her upbringings in poverty... — I'ma editor2022 (🗣️💬 |📖📚) 21:22, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not weird; it's just incomplete. Feel free to add to the article. MartinezMD (talk) 23:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Personal and Early Life?
Talk:United States, Chanceries of Foreign Governments

message: I think this list should be merged into List of Washington, D.C. embassies.  There are only a handful of countries without embassies in Washington, D.C. (6 countries represented only at the United Nations in New York, Guinea-Bissau with it's embassy nearby in Rockville, Maryland, and 3 countries with no diplomatic relations - Cuba, North Korea, and Somolia).  These exceptions are noted in List of Washington, D.C. embassies. --Aude 01:17, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The lists need to be cross-checked for accuracy — I can work on that, but if others help that's great. --Aude 01:18, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

text: It could use it to help get everything straight. --Azaza767 20:26, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gel filtration chromatography

message: This page lists gel permeation chromatography as a different method.  Are not gel permeation, gel filtration, gel exclusion, size exclusion, and molecular sieve all the same thing? Srnec 20:48, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. The page redirects to Size exclusion chromatography -- Serephine / talk - 12:14, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Permeation and filtration?
Talk:Hurricane Alma (1966)

message: Some info about impact in the intro, external links, wikification of the impact, more impact if possible. Jdorje 05:26, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: About 2/3 the way down the article is a satellite mosaic showing satellite imagery just after local noon during 9 days of Alma's life cycle.  I replaced our previous image with the best image of the group.  Thegreatdr 16:56, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Life cycle of Alma in satellite images
Talk:Ambrones

message: I don't know, what do you think? Hermann becomes Armin-ius and Herminones become Erminones, but not to themselves, only to the foreign Romans. Apparently, the Romans recognized Cimbri (which ought to have been native *himmer) but did not recognize the Ambrones, calling them by a different name. If they were in fact recognizing that they used a different name, what name could that have been and why was it different? If these questions are not answerable, are we justified in presenting it that way, rather than just taking the source at face value?
Of course we can find answers. I saw on the Internet a very amusing piece by a Turkish scholar, which rendered some Indo-european text into very good original Turkish. He was making a good point there. To what extent are we justified in hypothesizing a transition from Cimbri to Ambrones? I would leave the question in and see if we can't get some insights from other people. it would be nice if we could get a few different derivations and present them together as possibilities.PS I forgot to sign. Here:Dave 01:51, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cimbri and Ambrones
Talk:Robert Recorde

message: The article states that Robert Recorde invented the equal sign. What is the reference for this? This seems dubious (see, e.g., refs in Footnote 4 of http://mbarany.com/Awgryme-Nov2019.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceacy (talk • contribs) 01:25, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misattribution: invention of the equal sign? 

message: I would like to replace "respectable" with prominent does anyone object ?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruskin (talk • contribs) 07:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: respectable family

message: Who is Sherburne and where did he write such things? The source of the statement in the 1911 Brittanica (and the 1875 or 1902 edition) is almost certainly
Charles Hutton's Mathematical and Philosophical Dictionary of 1795, but there the trail seems to end. Sir Edward Sherburne (1616–1702) lived between Recorde and Hutton, but as a poet is not an immediately likely source.  --Lambiam 20:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is Sherburne? 

message: This article states he invented the plus sign, but other articles in Wikipedia (see also links) claims otherwise. At best he introduced it to English readers, but then again his works were amongst the first to be published in English. So it seems just outright wrong. Anyone know for sure? Dcutter (talk) 08:58, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invented the + sign? 

message: Is the final e in the surname silent? Was silent in the 16th century?
--Маргарита Бабовникова (talk) 05:56, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation?
Talk:King of the Deathmatch

message: I redirected this page to Xtreme Pro Wrestling, but that might not be the correct place for it, as it seem to be kind of an ambiguous term.  Peyna 01:46, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect 

message: There's an equivalent tournament called the Tournament of Death of CZW. jlog3000 (talk) 00:38, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similar deathmatch tournament
Talk:Acanthodactylus erythrurus

message: Hi! I would love to see a few more images (one or two at most) of the patterning differences of the spots on these lizards back. I also would love a few more details on the importance of their feet and what role this plays in their speed and agility. Overall great page though- I really appreciated the geographic range vs habitat distinction.
== images reproduction request for the Wikipedia free encyclopedia 
Here some addresses follow to pages that contain images that might be worth
asking permission for:
http://www.ittiofauna.org/webmuseum/rettili/acantodactylus_erythrurus01.htm
http://pdubois.free.fr/espece.php?MyEspece=ACAERY
http://www.mediterranea.org/cae/divulgac/reptiles/lagcolir.htm
Ncrfgs 01:47, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about images and conservation section 

message: The content of this article may be more appropiated for Acanthodactylus.
Ncrfgs 00:54, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Acanthodactylus erythrurus]] or [[Acanthodactylus]]? 

message: When we were young, and sometimes a little too wild in our father's opinion, he sometimes quoted some 19'th century German naturalist, who was infamous for ascribing various misplaced characters to animals; if I got this right.  (If I've heard his name, I've forgotten it.)  The quotation was, roughly:
::This animal is very evil; it defends itself, when you attack it.
Now, in this wp article, I just found a rather similar characterisation:
::The spiny-footed lizard does not have a particularly pleasant nature. Like every member of this genus, it is very aggressive and bites tenaciously if one tries to catch it.
Isn't this a grossly outdated attitude - in the 21'st century, if not in the 19'th? JoergenB (talk) 22:00, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incredible deja vue! 

message: Hello!
I edited this article, mainly by fixing the citations. The article was mostly uncited, so I had to add in citations for every new fact. In addition, there were many repeat citations that needed to be fixed that I was able to delete. Furthermore, some information might have been unreliable so I removed them for now until further references can be provided.Nikhil.sekar (talk) 21:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  10/21 Edits
Talk:Acanthodactylus

message: *Acathodactus is a species within the lacertidae family — referred to as "wall lizards."
Acathodactus or Acathodactylus?
Ncrfgs 01:54, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Acathodactus'' or ''Acathodactylus''? 

message: I suggest that Acanthodactylus harranensis be merged into this article.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:42, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's wikipedia policy that every species deserves it's own page, so no need to merge. Ruigeroeland (talk) 08:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge request 
Talk:Bay of Campeche

message: The Spanish name provided for the Bay of Campeche is incorrect. The proper name is the "Sonda de Campeche."
Aaron Ruby
aaronruby@swbell.net
: Perhaps that term is also used, but it's marked "Bahía de Campeche" on my maps, and that's the heading in the Spanish Wikipedia.  (For that matter, I've seen "Gulf of Campeche" used in English). Butsuri 01:02, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should not be called Bay of Campeche. There is a confusion. One thing is the Bay of Campeche and, on the other side, a much larger geographical incident is the Gulf of Campeche (also named Sonda de Campeche). The map shown here is not correct; it is indeed the map corresponding to the Gulf of Campeche. The same confusion appeared in es.Wiki and has been corrected, or is in the process of being corrected. Maybe you'd like to rectify.--Yodigo (talk) 16:27, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Biculturalism

message: Does anybody know what the author of "In the context of deafness, the word biculturalism is used less controversially because the distinction (between spoken language and sign language) is commonly recognised as a genuine binary distinction transcending the distinctions between various spoken languages." means? A little bit of explanation might help.
Biculturalism is not just a national policy and a deafness-related term.  It is also a personal experience, which I suppose would place it in the realm of psychology.  What happens to people of mixed ethnic heritage, who develop understandings of two different cultures?  Or immigrants, who learn the culture of their new country while retaining their own?  I'll try to figure out a way to work biculturalism as a personal phenomenon in.--Rockero 02:20, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Bicultural describes a person who has more than one culture in them (like me). So I don't understand why there isn't an article for that.
Biculturalism is an idea-- I am not saying that it's a bad idea, but it's not the same as being bicultural.
So my point is, the term "bicultural" should not redirect here-- it should go to it's own article.
98.245.148.9 (talk) 02:55, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bicultural is Different than Bicultural'''''ism'''''
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/List of modern day dictators

message: We don't have to close the vote on any rigid timetable. Often votes are allowed to stay open longer than 5 days in order to establish a consensus; and this VfD offers as compelling of reasons to do so as any other instance. As of now the deletes are at 60% instead of the needed 67% percent at the end of five days-- an arbitary little difference that does not offer much of a compelling reason to keep the article. Wikipedia is not well served by allowing editors to vote away NPOV and other content policies based on technicalities. 172 14:12, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote closing

message: Since the project page is (most curiously) protected, I will share my comments here.
I believe that 172 is correct that Wikipedia is not well served by the subject page.  It is my view that Wikipedia is, as a rule, not well served by "List" articles, because the decision to include a particular entry or not on a list is an all-or-nothing affair that provides no opportunity for reasoned discourse.  There are many individuals in modern history that cannot be accurately labelled as "dictators" or "non-dictators" and by creating such a false dichotomy pages such as this mislead the reader, lower the overall tone of discourse for the encyclopedia, and create conflict.  It is this false dichotomy, and not NPOV or original research, that leads me to conclude that the subject page should be deleted, though the NPOV and original research arguments do carry significant weight as well.  The Uninvited Co., Inc. 17:23, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  regarding deletion of the list