lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CVC (theorem prover)

message: CVC Lite has been renamed CVC3 and the web page has moved. Rather than follow the "marketing" twists and turns of the project, I would suggests renaming this page "CVC theorem prover" and linking to each of the 3 major versions:
CVC, 
CVC Lite, and
CVC3. -Clconway 19:27, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Muslim controversies related to Nikah Mut'ah

message: need to add this:
:It does not make sense for Allah (swt) to say if you do not have sex with your wife, you must pay her the dowry, and then to later on say: "If you have sex with them, you must pay them their dowry." 
--Striver 19:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

message: I recognize the problems in the lengthy duplicative articles on the hadith concerning the origin of the conflict between the Sunni and the Shi'a, and the ones on the doctrine of "temporary marriage." I personally think it would be quite possible to have an article on each individual hadith, since they all have a substantial later literature--but they should obviously be written not as a long quotation, but as an encyclopedic discussion giving various views--there is surely enough later secondary literature to discuss in the thirteen centuries of Islamic scholarship. But it might be practical to combine them by topic, and this should be decided in the appropriate workgroup, or if necessary through dispute resolution. 
In this particular case it seems to me -- admittedly as someone very far from an expert -- that this is the sort of combination article that should be encouraged. 
Prod in any case is for uncontroversial deletions, and it is clear that this will not be one. You are of course welcome to pursue these deletions though AfD, but I strongly urge all those involved to find a better way of dealing with them, one which will  improve the encyclopedia by providing an informative set of articles. DGG (talk) 02:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: hadith

message: I have several other translations of Quran that say nothing about lust!
http://www.altafsir.com/ViewTranslations.asp?Display=yes&SoraNo=4&Ayah=0&Language=2&LanguageID=1&TranslationBook=3 
[4:24]
And all married women (are forbidden unto you) save those (captives) whom your right hands possess. It is a decree of Allah for you. Lawful unto you are all beyond those mentioned, so that ye seek them with your wealth in honest wedlock, not debauchery. And those of whom ye seek content (by marrying them), give unto them their portions as a duty. And there is no sin for you in what ye do by mutual agreement after the duty (hath been done). Lo! Allah is ever Knower, Wise.
http://www.submission.org/suras/sura4.htm 
[4:24] Also prohibited are the women who are already married, unless they flee their disbelieving husbands who are at war with you. These are GOD's commandments to you. All other categories are permitted for you in marriage, so long as you pay them their due dowries. You shall maintain your morality, by not committing adultery. Thus, whoever you like among them, you shall pay them the dowry decreed for them. You commit no error by mutually agreeing to any adjustments to the dowry. GOD is Omniscient, Most Wise.      88.97.164.254 (talk) 00:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: What is the source?
Talk:Nicholas Smith (actor)

message: I think you should include his performance as The Major in Agatha Christie's play The Mousetrap at St Martin's Theatre Soho.
We saw the play in 1991 and had no idea he was in the play but he got a round of applause when he first walked on-stage and the audience immediately recognized him.  We enjoyed the play very much, he and the other actors were wonderful. 2601:581:8000:33:7174:6903:87FF:7F89 (talk) 00:32, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Mousetrap
Talk:Jan Provoost

message: At the Royal Museum of Fine Arts in Brussels I saw a painting by Jan Provoost of saints which was entirely done in shades of grey, a black and white painting of the 15th or 16th century, centuries before the invention of "black and white.". Was Provoost color blind. Was there another reason to do away with color? Can anyone explain? --Jahsonic 19:24, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The technique is called grisaille. It was a Late Gothic convention also used by Gérard David and in illuminated manuscripts. The Why of it, I don't know. The effect can be like a representation of stone sculpture. Here's a link.--Wetman 21:20, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! --Jahsonic 11:04, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nivå

message: The stories about mall shootings and drugs were without a doubt made up by someone with too much spare time. I live in Nivå and it never happened! I didn't know of this article before I read about it in Ugebladet. The vandalism made headlines!
:Wow! I never believed the edits, nor have I ever believed tha tHitler or 50Cents ever lived in Nivå. I've tried to temper the edits showcasting Nivå as a warzone and even were insulted on my talk page for not knowing what the f*** I'm talking about. I've created the article since I've lived in Nivå in the 1980s and tried to translate the danish article into English. If you have less polemic edits to make, please make them so that these edis become history.
:I went back to Nivå in 2004 and took some of the photos featured in the article. I'd love to see more factual information on Nivå featured. Cheers, and thanks for the confirmation, Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons 19:42, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Arthur Brough

message: There is a suggestion that this article may have been cut and pasted from elsewhere. It is much more likely that other sites have cut and pasted this article, and added them to their own sites. Most of the article was written from my own personal knowledge and experience - hence there are also no citations. My sister went to school with Arthur Brough's daughter, and I often accompanied my mother to his repertory theatre in Folkestone, where she had a season ticket for many years. It was natural enough therefore for me to learn about his life and follow his career. It is true that there are quotes from his fellow performers about his work and personality, but such quotes are of course in the public domain. 
Best Wishes
Fairlightseven  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.5.125 (talk) 13:28, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:James Hayter (actor)

message: 1946 - Sherlock Holmes: Dressed to Kill - BASIL RATHBONE - Roy William Neill | FULL MOVIE
james hayter was in this movie at the end as the tour guide of the dr samuel johnson home  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.10.176.151 (talk) 11:52, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  james hayter 

message: "His later career included roles in TV series such as The Forsyte Saga (1967)"
He wasn't in "The Forsyte Saga".  Wikipedia maintains its poor reputation for accuracy.80.43.199.197 (talk) 22:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forsyte Saga 

message: Also the voice of Mr. Kipling (cakes). 2A02:C7C:8A7D:AD00:AD19:3F84:8F2C:8DDF (talk) 18:47, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actor James Hayter
Talk:Shōen

message: From wikipedia: Shōen appeared in the eighth century and disappeared in the sixteenth century. 
From http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9067468/shoen
in Japan, from about the 8th to the late 15th century (...)
Which is correct?
129.240.250.153 18:29, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Tim O'Malley (actor)

message: This play did not receive significant coverage in multiple, reliable, independent sources. It would be sufficient to cover the play summary style in its parent article until the content warrants a split. czar 05:57, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This page appears to be an autobiography, and if it weren't for the Godshow claim it'd be an easy delete as none of the other claims appear to pass the notability bars of WP:ANYBIO or WP:CREATIVE ("most recognizable" for a role that is not even mentioned in the article??). Support a Merge/Redirect, though centralising at Godshow (and damn the COATRACK) would end up with a better article as it would be easier to keep focus on key biographical info, but not minor roles. I'd say that Godshow could be a weak keep due to the four year run and two Chicago Reader's Critic's Picks, despite no apparent coverage outside of Chicago. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 13:04, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'd want to see some evidence for those unsourced claims ("sold out its four runs at The Second City Chicago", "was the Chicago Reader Critic's Pick twice") before passing judgement on their import, personally. czar 13:48, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Some sourcing/ce performed. Not saying it's a good keep (and I don't promise to edit it much more =), but there's enough evidence of signficant coverage including a couple of sources which aren't freely visible online. There was almost certainly a Sun-Times review as well, but the only evidence of that is the play's appearance in their top 10. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 10:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  From what I can see, the show's coverage looks to be all (1) local or (2) minor. Since the show is autobiographical, I don't think it would be a coatrack to have the bulk of the actor's article be about the show, since that would be proportionate to the coverage. czar 02:24, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:   Risks with a merge here include a higher likelihood that monitoring and re-editing will be required, and a much higher likelihood of the bio being taken to AFD. While coverage of Godshow was (with what's visible) local, the CMA is a sizable pool. In the interests of moving forward, let me phrase my !vote as as Support a Merge (preference to Godshow). If you still feel that a merge here is best, then go for it (inasmuch as two commentators are quorum).~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 09:16, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Godshow]]
Talk:MPRG Erlangen Division 3

message: Do you really think it makes sense to set up a individual page for each division? (I don't think so...)
--84.148.21.102 19:33, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual Page? 
Talk:Madman (Marvel Comics)

message: David A, I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you on your image upload.  It is perhaps a slightly clearer image, coming from the side of the comics-printing divide when all books started to look glossier and sharper, but I think the one I uploaded, Image:Madman Hulk.JPG, is preferable to the one you uploaded, Image:Madman (Marvel Comics).jpg, on the grounds that it's from Madman's first appearance (as Madman), from the team who created him, the arguably more epochal, seminal Hulk team of Peter David and Dale Keown.
I wonder if there are some other editors watching this article who could weigh in possibly?  Ford MF 17:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was odd that we both uploaded them at the same time wasn't it? I had just rewritten a bit in the article, looked through my archive, and uploaded it, but suddenly found another there. In any case, this was the Madman character as he was handled by his creator, Peter David, when worked out and defined beyond a locked story-context, and given a fitting 'costume'/'uniform' of sorts. Besides being a nicer picture, and a central 'pose-shot' of the character, it more significantly includes dialogue that instantly goes to the heart of Madman's irreverent, entertaining lunacy, rather than the downbeat tone of his introduction. It's the kind of picture which may interest other creators in using the character again. Dave 19:28, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Could you upload an image with better resolution then?  If the dialogue in the image is a selling point, it doesn't make much sense for it to be unreadably small.  Ford MF 20:08, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem. Although there are limits. I have to size it down a lot to not do copyright infringement. Dave 20:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I've fixed it. Dave 20:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Main image duel

message: This article is missing the character's publication history. It should be added to the article.--Paleface Jack (talk) 16:23, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Publication History!? 

message: There is some information on the character's recent appearances and the character's death needs to be added.--Paleface Jack (talk) 02:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fictional Character Biography needs to be updated
Talk:Heroes of Mana

message: Why doesn't the external link go to the Heroes of Mana section on the World of Mana website?
http://www.square-enix.co.jp/mana/hom/top.html —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.198.239.14 (talk) 09:25, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Heroes of Mana website 

message: It should be noted that is the Japanese Release Date. There is no confirmed NA Release Date.
(Given this game has ties to another game Seiken Denestu 3, which had no NA Release, I doubt this game
will ever make it to NA shores.) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.218.204.226 (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date Error 

message: Based on information on official website, interface, and game play, I'd say it should be labeled as RTS intead of SRPG. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 142.58.198.76 (talk) 22:06, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in Genere? 

message: I think it should be mentioned somewhere in this article that this game is a direct prequel to Seiken Densetsu 3, which is notable because very few Mana games are directly related to each other in terms of story (the only other case is Legend of Mana and Friends of Mana).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Speyeker (talk • contribs) 05:44, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prequel to Seiken Densetsu 3 
Talk:Kenneth Waller

message: In the sentence, “He also appeared as the Narrator in Peter and the Wolf, and Carl Davis a special concert piece, Duck's diary, for Waller.”, a verb has gone missing - did Carl Davis write, compose, assemble, direct, conduct - or something else entirely? I don’t know myself, but perhaps someone else does? Jock123 (talk) 17:12, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing verb…?
Talk:Titanic Quarter

message: Just to clarify, I dont consider it wrong to state that Shorts-Bombardier "downsized considerably over the last few years".
I noticed it was removed, then replaced. But to prevent a war of words, my take is, it is:
1) a fact
2) a considerable factor in the Government support of Titanic Quarter
(with thanks to the user who reverted the article)
Icanseeformilesandmiles 22:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  accusations of vanadlism 

message: This article is completely unsourced, and mostly original research. It also reads like a Laganside press release. Most of the text should be deleted if sources are not added. Stu ’Bout ye! 12:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: References/original research

message: ???  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.88.121 (talk) 18:01, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thinggy with a Ringgy  

message: http://www.belfastmet.ac.uk/
They've a new campus at Titanic. Probably worth a mention, if anyone knows more and fancies adding it. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:19, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Belfast Metropolitan campus
Talk:Howard Sackler

message: It has many details that are not included in the Wikipedia article, such as marriage and children and cause of death. Someone can incorporate them. 
https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/sackler-howard-oliver
VickiMeagher (talk) 15:10, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Here’s a new source article
Talk:CU-SGP

message: I'm not entirely clear the nature of this coalition; do they agree not to contest the same seats?  Regardless, I think this doesn't warrant its own article (esp. one like this which which mainly just contains a quote from their website) and should be merged into both parties' articles.
Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley talk contrib 19:50, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It does merit its own article because for foreigners who don't know dutch politics a dual link will be very confusing and situation needs some explaining (you finding it confusing is proof of that), furthermore this article has a considerable number of links from Euro-elections articles. C mon 20:54, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: This article focuses on the alliance in European Parliament elections.  But the two parties form an electoral alliance in a number of local elections, too.  Is it fair to use the same title, and thus the same article, to discuss such alliances? Bastin 17:18, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Other elections
Talk:Herman J. Mankiewicz

message: my  g_d, but for an article about one of hollywood's greatest WRITERS, this is so badly editted. i did a small piece but it's soooo loong. maybe after i retire...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.191.212.117 (talk) 14:16, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:U.S. Route 1 in Virginia

message: *12-1921-01 47: recommended that Warfield [between the Nottoway River and Alberta] be replaced by Smoky Ordinary [between the Nottoway River and Edgerton] in the description, "as this is a more direct route and combines with Route 12 for a distance of about four miles" - thus it had already joined at Lawrenceville, and this was four more miles of overlap
*01-1922-03 28-32: the General Assembly recommended that the road south from South Hill to North Carolina be added, but the toll bridge presents a problem
*08-1922-01 7: the state cannot take over the road south from South Hill until the toll is removed
*03-1923-01 15-16: people were willing to sell the Roanoke River bridge on SR 122 south of South Hill; the road cannot be maintained by the state until the toll is eliminated
*05-1923-01 9: the SHC declined the offer to buy the bridge south of South Hill
*12-1923-01 20: people requested that the road from the Nottoway River to South Hill [not to Lawrenceville!?] be reinstated; this was 12 miles shorter; it was one of the heaviest travelled roads in the state; the BPR had requested its re-establishment to add to the primary federal aid system, and would not approve the Lawrenceville route
*07-1924-01 5-6: under the law added South Hill-south to the state highway system, the state doesn't have to do anything until the bridge is taken over
*11-1924-02 8, 12-1924-02 6: SR 314 South Hill - northeast
*05-1925-01 12: Nottoway River southwest past Alberta to South Hill was established as a state highway as SR 31
*10-1925-02 5: Virginia endorsed North Carolina's request to add SR 32-324-12 (old SR 31) to the U.S. Highway system (so by then SR 31 went south from South Hill)
*01-1927-01 10: location of SR 31 south of South Hill fixed
*01-1927-01 13: Edgerton - Nottoway River is SR 122
*01-1927-01 3, 02-1927-01 6-7: south from South Hill is SR 31, but there's still a toll bridge; the state bought the bridge
--NE2 19:53, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Alignment details south of Petersburg
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/CGMA

message: I do not see where this article does not meet the notibility test? This is a viable and ligitimate organization. I am sorry Wikipediatrix, but you seem to rely on Google for an aweful lot of your resourcing and Google has not been found to be the most reliable source for information. There are plenty of references to this organization and I do not feel it needs to be deleted. Would deleting this article make it any less true that this organization exsists or has a rightful place in the field of Christian music? Hmmm. We might want to ponder that. Thank you for your time. [User:Junebug52|Junebug52] 15:53, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Seena Owen

message: I tagged the article with a dated no reference tag. The creation of an article with no source or references opens the door for an WP:AFD as lacking WP:NOTABILITY and possible WP:OR concerns. The use of external links with no references is inappropriate. The purpose of external links can be found here and using external links as a source may be copyright violations. I am not experienced at updating tags and the EL tag is not exactly what I want but brings light to the issue. Otr500 (talk) 07:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rferences and external links
Talk:Hop on Pop

message: I think all the Seuss books that are stubs need to be expanded. Does any one have any interesting information on these books? I think I'll write a plot summarty + spoiler warning. Vampypoo 20:01, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

message: The Simpsons episode S06E21 has this book as banned in some school (05:18). Why? Alone Coder (talk) 13:02, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't seen the episode but I would guess it's just sarcasm. I can't find anything on Google. Mr. Absurd (talk) 14:17, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

text: Homer speaks, as if with PTSD, of how traumatizing it was when the kids hopped on Pop. This is actually pretty good continuity to the 'Lisa's first words' episode, when Bart DID hop on Homer, in a way that looks like it would hurt. It's strange though, hearing Laura Bush say her kids did the same.. I mean the book is pretty clear: STOP. You must not hop on Pop. I understood that perfectly as a wee lad.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.206.153 (talk) 03:14, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Simpsons
Talk:George Washington Vanderbilt II

message: The unreferenced articles George Washington Vanderbilt III and George Washington Vanderbilt II have some conflicting references if you go look.  These reference show "III" being applied to the one who died in 1914 not the one born in 1914. If there are any experts on the subject with solid references your help would be greatly appreciated in referencing these two articles Jeepday (talk) 17:55, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference conflict

message: In the final paragraph of this article, there is an ambiguous sentence: "She sold additional land as finances demanded; today, about 8,000 acres (32 km2) remain 12,500 acres (51 km2) remained."  Could somebody with knowledge on this topic resolve this error, preferably with a citation?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.71.141.231 (talk) 20:22, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual conflict

message: George Vanderbilt was also responsible for the construction of the Episcopal Cathedral of All Souls. Should this be mentioned in the article? --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 04:13, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cathedral of All Souls

message: I am removing the following bizarre, speculative and unsupported passage from the lead paragraph:The subject of this article was and always has been known as George Washington Vanderbilt II. Whether or not his family should have named him George Washington Vanderbilt III is irrelevant: that is not the name they gave him. An editor's personal evaluation of the name has no place in this article.--Jim10701 (talk) 01:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The infobox and the lede identify him as III, which is at odds with the article title. Should they be changed? wintermute (talk) 01:40, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  II/III nonsense 

message: It says that George's mother may have been the one to warn them not to sail on Titanic because she had a premonition. However, if you look at the death date listed for his mother in the article on his father, you will note that she died around 16 years before Titanic sailed. BethHoneycutt1 (talk) 05:53, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titanic reference