lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Las Vegas Strip

message: Can this please be converted into a table? It would make it much easier to navigate the key info (I'm thinking of the columns as follows: name, build date, demolition date, notes/additional information).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.211.51.253 (talk) 07:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Covert 'Demolished or closed Strip casinos and hotels' into table 

message: Sure, the new stadium is being built "near" The Strip, but on the other side of the highway behind Luxor. While certainly worth mentioning in the same breath as Palms and Rio from a "hey, it's in the general area" kind of way... is it right to include it in a manner that suggests it is part of The Strip? SpikeJones (talk) 22:56, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stadium??? 

message: According to Google Maps, Russell Road does actually go through. SportsFan007 (talk) 07:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure what you're looking at—Russell Road does not go through at the Strip. See this Google Map: https://goo.gl/maps/zAAfkXUuRMS2. Russell Road dead ends at Las Vegas Blvd, and then picks up again to the east on the other side of McCarran Airport. -- LJ ↗ 15:11, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm looking at that it goes through the I15. SportsFan007 (talk) 15:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  The vertical road in the map in the article is Las Vegas Blvd, not I-15. The point is that it doesn't go through Las Vegas Blvd. Toohool (talk) 17:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ah ok, my apologies for the confusion, I labeled the vertical road so that there isn’t any further confusion. Thank you!!! SportsFan007 (talk) 18:01, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russell Road 

message: Should we start a section of notable restaurants on the strip ? ~ ~mitch~ (talk) 16:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  ~ Restaurants ~ 

message: Since I heard that the Oakland A's are demolishing the Tropicana casino and replacing it with a new stadium, I think it really needs to be included… EverestMachine 4001 (talk) 02:26, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It was only a week or two ago that the A's were seriously considering another site nearby but off the Strip. Since the stadium site is still being negotiated, I would not include mention in this in the article until a proposal is finalized and contract negotiated. -- LJ ↗ 13:08, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oakland A's stadium needs to be included 

message: Hello  When it comes to "The Strip" vs. "the Strip", the lowercase version is far more common in sources. This was standardized across the article in 2009 (1, 2), though I see you have changed it here to a capitalized "The". Any objection to restoring the lowercase version?  AJFU  (talk) 14:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No problem... 2009 was a bit before my time. Thanks for the note.X CP X (talk) 17:06, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization
Talk:Dog kung fu

message: Are you sure about this?  Any sources?  Dog style should be a Fujian style (South China), and I doubt that they have dog-like crawling stances.
Edededed 07:11, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: The source links do not specify a stance that requires both hands and feet to be on the ground, and none of the images shows such a stance.  This information requires a reliable verifiable source. -- Medains 09:21, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Langston Hughes

message: The photo captioned "The Poet at age 21" is not Hughes but rather a photo of the English composer Samuel Coleridge-Taylor. BJECarpenter (talk) 20:00, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - note the autograph in the picture, which I have today removed from the page, and that it closely resembles other photos of Coleridge-Taylor in his wiki biography. The file name needs correcting.Cloptonson (talk) 12:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Langston Hughes 

message: Could someone add the page to Category:Poets from Missouri? I cannot because it is locked 2A00:23C7:CB0D:9D01:D087:BB45:2008:C907 (talk) 00:57, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category: Poets from Missouri
Talk:Regular sequence

message: I think it's probably better to move this to regular sequence (algebra), now; and then redirect regular sequence to that.
Charles Matthews 08:17, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: #REDIRECT Whatever.
Charles Matthews 16:35, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving (2004)

message: Hmm, the text says that the depth of R is the depth of the R-module R itself.  A bit later it states that the dept of an R-module is at most the dimension of this R-module.  This sentence seems to imply that the depth of R itself is at most 1?  Or should one add the comment that the restriction to the depth only applies for free R-modules?
Melchior
146.186.134.176 (talk) 23:02, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible typo in the text 

message: I don't think it is correct to say that only some authors require that M/(r_1,\dots,r_d)M\neq 0. This requirement is critical to a correct definition. We can always add 1 (or a unit) to the sequence otherwise. Perhaps this can be clarified. If we do not have the requirement 1\in R, then we can also drop the requirement that this quotient is non-zero.
kapil (talk) 05:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Some authors also require ..."?
Talk:Peter Sculthorpe

message: Dysprosia, yes you're right, music evokes, scores simply direct, I was a bit sloppy there.  As to most famous, maybe?  One of the most famous, definitely. Clarkk
Most famous in Aus, I mean... I mean you think of Australian composer, you think of Sculthorpe... Dysprosia 10:05, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've read a lot about Sculthorpe, but have never seen a single word about his private life.  Is he married?  Does he have children?  Is he gay?  Is there anything on the public record about this?  JackofOz 10:15, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  Very interesting.  --  JackofOz (talk) 23:48, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Private Life

message: It isnt listed anywhere in this. A piece for chamber orchestra and string quartet? Isnt even mentioned in his work section...wtf?--GunshotGlitter 09:45, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Port Essington 

message: I've redirected Left Bank Waltz to this article. It came in at number 65 in the Classic 100 piano (ABC) countdown, but I can find no mention of it in the list of works. Could someone please add it, or if you like, could you provide me with a URL of Sculthorpe's complete works so I can update the list of works on this page? Cheers. GFHandel ♬  09:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left Bank Waltz 

message: It's under-referenced, and there appears to be too much reliance on a few sources.
Is FC Smith relevant? 
Hasn't Graham Skinner written a biography? 
This might be useful in the first instance. I don't intend to work on the article myself.
Tony (talk)  13:27, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  A few problems 
Talk:Intelligence

message: Please add the following recent title to further reading : 
Holm-Hadulla, Rainer M.; Funke, Joachim; Wink, Michael (2022). Intelligence - Theories and Applications, London, Berlin, New York: Springer Nature. ISBN 978-3-031-04197-6. source: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-04198-3 Homoscribens (talk) 18:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the  template. Please provide rationale and secondary sources establishing noteworthiness. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:29, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 10 August 2022 

message: I'd like to add to "Intelligence - Further Reading": 
Rainer M. Holm-Hadulla, Joachim Funke, Michael Wink: Intelligence - Theories and Applications. Springer Nature, Switzerland 2022; ISBN 978-3-031-04197-6. Kreativität und Intelligenz (talk) 07:38, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: Looks like this is a duplicate of a previous edit request; please establish noteworthiness as requested by . Rolf H Nelson (talk) 03:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2022
Talk:Reginald Wolfe

message: Is it OK to link to an online edition of the Chronicles? Please check out the link and tell me what you think! --Cobwebber 11:37, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Cobwebber! Even if the material is under the Univ of Pennsylvania's copyright, there's no reason we can't include a hyperlink to their site. (Purely as a side note, although they may claim copyright, they can't really own copyright on scans of public domain works--but that's a whole different battle that we don't have to concern ourselves with). So, anyway, I'll restore the link. PRiis 00:44, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

text: Oops--actually, I'll just restore it on the Holinshed page, not the Wolfe page. PRiis 00:54, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Online edition of Chrolicles and copyright
Talk:Raphael Holinshed

message: Is it OK to link to an online edition of the Chronicles? Please check out the link and tell me what you think! --Cobwebber 11:37, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, Cobwebber! Even if the material is under the Univ of Pennsylvania's copyright, there's no reason we can't include a hyperlink to their site. (Purely as a side note, although they may claim copyright, they can't really own copyright on scans of public domain works--but that's a whole different battle that we don't have to concern ourselves with). So, anyway, I'll restore the link. PRiis 00:59, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronicles link

message: The reference to Leland's "dank chronic" is obviously a reference to marijuana, and also obviously vandalism.  Can someone please fix this?  I can't determine if there is an earlier revision to which we can draw from.99.231.168.66 (talk) 07:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Leland's "Dank Chronic" 

message: The correct title of this article is Holinshed's Chronicles. One should realise that in reading "He became known only by the Chronicles of England, Scotland and Ireland, and all the information we have about him is related to this work.'" The subject is Holinshed's Chronicles. --Wetman (talk) 04:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title

message: I've turned Holinshed's Chronicles, which was a redirect, into a real article, as it would be possible to build a substantive article on this, whereas we know little about the subject of this article. Help needed, :-) Dougweller (talk) 13:57, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: New article

message: Greetings! I am a student doing a project on this page. There will be many edits to the page in the coming next few days based on research that I have done. Thank you! --JudgmentofAlice (talk) 00:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future Edits
Talk:Forward Wales

message: Does Forward Wales still exist?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Welshsocialist (talk • contribs) 14:30, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Does it still exisit?

message: The website that was linked is currently dead, is their any point keeping it up? I have tried to google to see if they have a new one, but alas they do not. --Welshsocialist (talk) 21:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, take it down. T3chl0v3r (talk) 21:26, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead website
Talk:2004 Madrid train bombings

message: I just have to ask, do we really need 15 sources for that statement? Zazaban 06:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Please look to the archived discussion to see how dificult is to say the truth in this article. The more evident issue have required months and tones of references.--Igor21 09:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Spanish nationals who sold the explosives to the terrorists were also arrested." 

message: The article says 911.
My calendar says 912: 19 days to the end of September 2001, plus October (31), November (30), and December (31) makes 111.
Then all of 2002 (365 days) and 2003 (3)5 more days) brings the total to 841. 
Then January (31) and February (29--a leap year) of 2004 brings the total to 901. 
Then the event was the 11th day of March. That's 912. 
Is there some Spanish convention at play here where you don't count the last day? Jeffreynye (talk) 16:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many days between Sept. 11, 2001 and March 11, 2004?
Talk:OpenBSD

message: Two main criticisms are made of BSDs in general and of OpenBSD in particular, the first apparently from year 2017:
       "Bugs are still easy to find in those kernels, even in OpenBSD". 
and the other:
       "Two years later, in 2019, ... that while OpenBSD has some effective mitigations, a significant part of them are "useless at best and based on pure luck and superstition", arguing for a more rational approach when it comes to designing them.[64] 
BSD kernel function bugs shown appeared less as manifestly incorrect software(1) than as potentially troublesome edge use conditions that belong more to calling routine checks. The [64] citation did not quite relate to the second criticism which seemed to come from an off the record discussion not found in the cited slide presentation. The citation suggests nevertheless a level of futility "useless mitigation" (maybe the Xorg root exploit??) for whichever OpenBSD one the presenter had in mind but readers here shall not know which or know of.
(1) unless for say the TCP stack ipsec example the comparison (<) of xisr->sadb_x_ipsecrequest_len to sizeof(*xisr) is not of like-to-like quanitites in the struct secpolicy *key_msg2sp() function 'bug' example.  Mkhomo (talk) 12:59, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Understanding cited Security criticisms
Template talk:Provinces of Sweden

message: The names of the provinces were changed in February 2015 to the pseudo-Latin form.  English Wikipedia does not use this form for the provinces, preferring (with the exception of Scania/Skåne the modern-day Swedish version, which is how the individual articles are titled.  It is not helpful to link to names which are simply not used in the encyclopaedia (in many cases, the pseudo-Latin form is not even mentioned at the article page), and does not help users to find the names they are familiar with.  It appears to be something of a minority obsession, which is unsupported by most readers or editors, or indeed by most of the English speaking world.  Skinsmoke (talk) 10:25, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names of provinces 

message: This template is rather strange. Called "Provinces of Sweden", but including Finland. This is typical for a former user, Mic, who has not been active here since 2004!
Peculiarities:
The so called "Lands of Sweden (a terminology created by him in 2003), normally just called "landsdelar" ("parts of the country") in Sweden are not the "normal" ones. The coat of arms are also his own "invention". Theese areas have no arms. For Götaland he uses a lion taken from the "stora riksvapnet" for Svealand he uses the three crowns (lilla riksvapnet) and for Norrland the MUNICIPAL ARMS OF BODEN!. This is not official in any way, but just phantasy. He also added "Skåneland" which is NOT one of the "landsdelar" (the arms he uses is that of Scania).
This is not serious in any way! --Muniswede (talk) 21:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This is so terrible. Have not thought of it before.I must change it immeadeatly! --Muniswede (talk) 21:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

text: You might wanted to wait for a moment to discuss this. We Finns have been content with the template. Indeed, the old provinces of Sweden date are a historical phenomenon dating from the time when Finland was part if the realm proper. As such, the list makes sense. It does not reflect the current status but the pre-1634 situation. The Finnish provincial coats of arms feature on Gustav Vasa's grave. Scanian coat of arms does not. --MPorciusCato (talk) 10:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I made the changes so quick, because I found the template it so appalling. Non-existing arms (espacially the BODEN arms representing Norrland!) We have three of this "parts of the country". I even think that "Lands of Sweden" was "Mic invention", but I accept it, for no better name. The whole thing was anachronistic. --Muniswede (talk) 11:17, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bizarre template
Template talk:Historical provinces of Finland

message: This is a variant of Template:Provinces of Sweden. -- Mic 15:37, Mar 11, 2004 (UTC)
*Template:Provinces of Sweden is Swedish landskap.
* This template [Template:Provinces of Sweden Finland} is a mix of swedish and finnish landskap.
These are swedish:
Blekinge | Bohuslän | Dalarna | Dalsland | Gotland | Gästrikland | Halland | Hälsingland | Härjedalen | Jämtland | Lappland | Medelpad | Norrbotten | Närke | Skåne | Småland | Södermanland | Uppland | Värmland | Västerbotten | Västergötland | Västmanland | Ångermanland | Öland | Östergötland
These are finnish:
Åland | Finland Proper |Karelia | Laponia | Nylandia | Ostrobothnia | Satakunda | Savonia | Tavastia |
Lands of Sweden is: | Götaland | Norrland | Svealand 
Lands of Finland is: Österlanden
81.234.119.136 01:35, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Support for a meaningfully descriptitve name -- 70.24.248.246 (talk) 06:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Hafenstraße

message: I just edited this entry but I must confess I don't know anything about the subject (despite having been a squatter once!). I just felt it could read a bit better - my guess is that the initial article was written by a German speaker, judging by the phraseology. Anyway, my point is that my rewrite could have introduced factual inaccuracies, so if someone wants to check that would be great. Lancevortex 16:36, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Body language

message: Body language is a type of communication in which physical behaviors, as opposed to words, are used to express or convey information. Such behavior includes facial expressions, body posture, gestures, eye movement, touch and the use of space. The term body language is usually applied in regard to people but may also be applied to animals.[1] The study of body language is also known as kinesics.[2] 117.222.128.212 (talk) 12:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  body language
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Plautus satire vs Raul654

message: Should Plautus ever return and begin his bad behavior again (I sincerely hope the former never happens, and if it does I think the latter is inevitable), do I/we/whoever has to deal with him have to go through the entire dispute resolution process over again? →Raul654 14:13, Mar 11, 2004 (UTC)
:Lots of things may change until March 2005. Even the commitees and their formal structue. Therefore I don't think we can answer this question in any meaningful way. My personal opinion is that formally things will have to go through the entire process again (whatever that may be at that time), but it's probably all going to happen a lot faster due to at least a couple of reasons (the commitees will work much more efficient with a one year experience behind, and his previous ban will definitely count as well). But then again, that's just my 2 cents, I don't think you'll get anything better than that due to the large time lapse.
:On another train of thoughts, I don't think it's such a good idea to populate this page and similar pages with what is basically a discussion. I don't want to move the text myself because I answered the question myself. But if any other arbitrator feels the same, please feel free to move this whole section to the talk page. --Gutza 14:51, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Question for the committee
Talk:Ernest Borneman

message: Ernest Wilhelm Julius Borneman seemes to be a strange mixture of English and German. Shouldn't it be Ernst Wilhelm Julius Bornemann ? 131.130.181.71 16:59, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think so. I believe I've made a stupid mistake there. Thanks a lot, 131.130.181.71. <KF> 21:28, 11 Mar 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This Article carries the Category "Suicide", but there is no mention of it in the text. Why? --  Michael David (talk) 23:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide? 

message: I do not know where the article writer has this information from. Borneman says in his autobiography Die Urszene. Eine Selbstanalyse (S. Fischer, Frankfurt/Main 1977), on p. 13: "Meine Eltern machten einen Laden für Kinderkleidung in Charlottenburg auf. Er ging schlecht, weil Vater und Mutter von unheilbarer Ehrlichkeit und deshalb konstitutionell ungeeignet für das Gewerbe waren... torkelte das Geschäft meine ganze Kindheit hindurch am Rande des Konkurses. Immer wieder musste mein Vater auf Arbeit gehen, um uns vorm Verhungern zu bewahren..." I don't see how anybody can qualify such a situation as "relative wealth".
Menander69 (talk) 17:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Borneman grew up in relative wealth 

message: Given the current lack of references perhaps editors who read German will find this useful:-
Article from Stern in June 1995 following Bornemann's death
Testbed (talk) 06:26, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Online reference 

message: “...at the age of 80 after the collapse of a love affair with a colleague 61 years his junior.”
I don’t think a 19 year old was his colleague. Please consider rephrasing. E A (talk) 05:04, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  “Colleague”?