lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rosenfeld

message: The link to my user page was recently removed from here, with the reason cited being "vanity." However, this is a page on "Rosenfeld"s and "Rosenfield"s. That is, if someone clicks on the name "Eric Rosenfield" they're going to want some information about that person (me). Otherwise, why have the name there at all? By Wikipedia convention, I'm not permitted to create a Wikipedia page about myself, so I figured a link to my user page was the next best thing. Now this page is actually less useful than it was before. Why not have a link to my user page? - Eric Rosenfield 20:05, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vanity or Information
Talk:Test money

message: LOL
--64.59.144.21 16:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  LOL 

message: I've changed inherent value to financial value, since the inherent value of the coins and notes would be merely their value as pieces of metal or paper: their value isn't inherent, but is a consequence of an agreement to use them as money.
I've removed the term destructive testing, since this would refer to destruction of the equipment under test, not prior destruction of the objects used to test it. Musiconeologist (talk) 20:40, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inherent value, destructive testing
Talk:Cité du Train

message: The opening paragraph claims the Cité du Train is "the biggest railway museum in the world".
But later on it says "site covering 15,000 m² (this compares with ... Britain's National Railway Museum that covers more than 85,000 m²;". Both can't be true TiffaF (talk) 17:17, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biggest Railway museum in the World? 
Talk:Gare d'Austerlitz

message: This page was moved without explanation or discussion on 12 November. I have moved it back per WP:BRD, as the original title remains the common name in English. If there is a good reason to have this at the proposed title it should be discussed via the Requested Move process. Moonraker12 (talk) 21:39, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move reverted
Talk:Gare de l'Est

message: This page was moved without explanation or discussion twice (from Gare de l'Est to Gare de Paris-Est  in February 2011, then to Paris-Est in November 2017): This has been restored to its original title via WP:RM#Undiscussed moves. Also, the original title remains the common name in English. If there is a good reason to have this at the proposed title it should be discussed via the Requested Move process. Moonraker12 (talk) 23:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: Is the pronounciation mentionned in the introduction, “[ɡaʁ də lˈɛ]”, the standard English one? Because it is not the French one, which would be [ɡaʁ də lˈɛst]. palpalpalpal (talk) 12:52, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: The article could definitely be improved by listing services, provided to travelers at the station, other than just boarding trains, for example left luggage or waiting rooms.  172.58.109.40 (talk) 14:15, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Services
Talk:List of prime ministers of the Democratic Republic of the Congo

message: Definitely merge --AndrewRT 20:08, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh yes. List of Prime ministers of the Democratic Republic of the Congo looks like the better of the two in my book. Btw, I think that "ministers" should have been capitalized to be consistent with similar pages. Valentinian (talk) 21:01, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Capitlisation done - thks for pointing out. --AndrewRT 20:49, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Frogger II: ThreeeDeep!

message: The Home for the Underdogs link seems to be Spam.  I got a bunch of pop-ups and a page that was had nothing to do with Frogger or video games.  Is anyone else getting something different —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Antmusic (talk • contribs) 19:54, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't get any popups at all, just a page about frogger II.  There were ads in the page, but no new windows. --Burntnickel 22:56, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Home for the Underdogs link seems to be Spam
Talk:Video Pinball series

message: The current version of this article has done nothing to improve our information on the three Atari-made video games titled "Video Pinball". In this case, it has put chronology ahead of actual historic (and thus encyclopedic) importance. The 1977 dedicated console game called Video Pinball was a crude pinball simulation and therefore really was pinball only in name. The coin-op arcade would be second in historical importance, as the only big-time arcade hit (in the sense of the Golden Age of Arcade Games) from 1978 was Space Invaders. The Atari 2600 game Video Pinball is by far the most important historically and also the best-remembered game under that name. Worse, this version of the article lists the 1978 coin-op arcade game and the 1980 Atari 2600 console version as "ports". These games are in no way ports of the older dedicated game console that has more in common with Breakout than a true pinball simulation. This article needs to be fixed to address these issues. Bumm13 09:44, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not pleased with current version of this article
Talk:Chemins de fer du Calvados

message: *expand locomotives, make into table.
*add more photographs
Mjroots (talk) 07:02, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: To do
Talk:South Miami, Florida

message: NN lower school Epeefleche (talk) 10:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[South Miami Elementary School]]
Talk:Space Eggs

message: The lips do not drop bombs, and die in one shot.  The fuzzballs also die in one shot.  I can verify this is the case for the Apple II version, and you can see video of the Atari version on youtube.
The ship merge only happens if your score is over 1,000, and looks like it can only happen once:
13b0: a5 90        CheckDoubleShip lda did_multi_ship ;have we done the multi-ship grab yet?
13b2: d0 06                 bne     L13BA      ;yes, don't do it again
13b4: a5 b0                 lda     cur_score_hi ;check the current score
13b6: c9 0f                 cmp     #$0f       ;at least 1000?
13b8: b0 01                 bcs     L13BB      ;yes, do the multi-ship thing
13ba: 60           L13BA    rts
13bb: 20 e0 0c     L13BB    jsr     MultiShipGrab
13be: a9 ff                 lda     #$ff
13c0: 85 90                 sta     did_multi_ship
13c2: 60                    rts
Fadden0 (talk) 06:01, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gameplay
Talk:California Department of Transportation

message: This article reads like a Caltrans brochure. Caltrans has been extensively criticized, and this article makes it sound like an unequivocal success. The only phrase which even comes close to criticism is "stubbornly idiosyncratic", and this comes paired with praise for being "innovative". -Juansmith 20:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless somebody formulates some concrete contradictions to what's in the article page right now, I don't think the POV tag is justified. --Frescard 04:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV warning

message: Two issues. First of all, the 85-101 interchange, as I understand it, is primarily a VTA project funded mostly with local funds, not a Caltrans project.  A real Caltrans project would be the Bay Bridge retrofit or the new Alfred Zampa Bridge.  So we need to replace the picture with one of a real Caltrans project.  
Second, the picture of the SoCal district office is terrible.  We need a better photo that's not shot straight into the sun.  I would take it myself but I won't be in downtown L.A. for the foreseeable future unless something comes up.  For an example of how to take good photos of a building, see United States Patent and Trademark Office.  My first photos were shot from the other side of the building (straight into the sun) and looked terrible.  Then later when I had the time I went around to the other side (so that the sun would be at my back) and took the photo that's now in the article.--Coolcaesar 22:02, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture issues 
Talk:Johnny Weissmuller Jr.

message: The Wiki entry on his father, Johnny Weissmuller, lists his death as July 27, but the Chronicle's obit states he died on Friday, which would be July 28.
DL77 20:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Thursday or Friday?

message: Whether or not this entry should be deleted can be decided by consensus, but Johnny Jr. was a published author and did appear in several movies and TV shows. He does have his own IMDb entry and his filmography is listed on the New York Times' movie site and hollywood.com.
DL77 11:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Candidate for Deletion?
Talk:Astro Blaster

message: Several sources states that Gus Pappas' record was set in 1982, e.g. The Onion AV Club. However the game's page at Twin Galaxies states that the record was verified on 06 November 2004. Twin Galaxies seems more authoritative than The Onion. These two dates are not necessarily incompatible, but it would be nice if there was a fuller explanation. Also note this page, which purports to be sourced from a Twin Galaxies publication that came out in 1987, dating Pappas' record back to 1982. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 15:05, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pappas' record 
Talk:Armor Attack

message: Walls are not visible in mame. Are there other emulators which "fix" this feature? 2fort5r (talk) 11:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: MAME
Talk:Advanced Dungeons & Dragons: Treasure of Tarmin

message: This should no longer be a stub. Whomever edited it to its current level should be commended. It seems like an excellent article now.139.48.25.61 (talk) 15:23, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Reassess

message: I removed this section:
:In theory the game could be played infinitely, especially if the player were to possess all three of the magic spell books, which allowed the player to see through walls, allowed the player to move through walls, and allowed the player to turn all their items platinum. Although the spell books also never break through use, the more powerful weapons break often
For two reasons;
* It is original research WP:NOR
* But mainly because it isn't true. The magic spell books were subject to breakage just like everything else IIRC. You could go through the maze over and over; at some point, you would break all the magic books in the dungeon, kill every monster, and run out of arrows and spritual weapons. You would run out of food. You might kill all the monsters before that happened, but that would only produce a stalemate in which you and the Minotaur's treasure were all that was left in the dungeon. At that point - are you really still "playing"? 139.48.25.60 (talk) 21:42, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infinite Play 
Talk:Rolls-Royce Tyne

message: Just took a look at this article. Although its about the Tyne turbo-prop, the attached image shows a turbojet.192.197.178.2 20:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The engine in the picture is a Tyne  - the engine is pictured from the rear looking at the jet pipe. The propeller-end is farthest from the camera and this particular sectioned engine doesn't have a propeller fitted, unlike the Dart shown in the background. Ian Dunster 11:11, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

message: The details about the engine turbine configuration in this article is slightly miss-leading. Immediately after mentioning the marine version, the article states that the LP turbine drives both the LP compressor and propeller. This is correct for the aero version but the marine variant has separate turbines, a single stage unit for driving the LP compressor and a two stage free power turbine with a hot-end drive for the drive to the ships propeller shaft (via reduction gearboxes).  
Timhurdle 13:07, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turbine configuration clarification 
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR/Assessment

message: Should our NASCAR-related lists be assessed as well? --D-Day I'm all ears How can I improve? 22:37, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not according to the Article progress grading scheme. There are Wikipedia:Featured lists, but there isn't the possibility for a GA class list. How to proceed, is good q, but as they are not articles, they are not under the same grading scheme. -slowpokeiv 23:06, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lists 

message: What should be done about seasons? There's a bit of a backlog on the unassessed category. --D-Day I'm all ears How can I improve? 20:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've assessed all the Nextel Cup seasons that have articles. My standard is that all season articles are stub-class if there isn't info on all the races, start-class if there is info on all the races (and upward from there); mid-importance by default, and high-importance if something happened that had lasting impact on NASCAR (examples: 1971, 1975, 1979, 2003). --Coredesat talk. o_O 21:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seasons 

message: I noticed we have some articles labeled as A-class but they didn't go through the GA process yet. Since A is above GA (I don't know why they did it like that, but whatever) shouldn't they have to be GA's before they can be A's? Recury 18:10, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NASCAR A-class articles 

message: I saw something about assessing the Rick Ware article. His shop is only about 5 minutes from my house and I have a friend that works for his Supercross team. I maybe could help out with that article if anybody wanted me to go talk to somebody at Ware Racing. KTM Jared 683 02:09, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rick Ware
Talk:Typo Attack

message: The name of the programmer, David Buehler, was linking to a USC football kicker. In that article it says that person graduated high school in 2005. Obviously, it's not the same person as the programmer of this game as it was published in 1982 and the football player wasn't even born then.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.75.81.251 (talk) 22:53, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Going by an ad in a 1984 issue of Enter magazine (right around the time of the sale of Atari to the Tramiels and the dissolution of AtariSoft, it looks like a Vic 20 and PCjr version were in the works. External link  --JohnDBuell (talk) 20:23, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible other platforms?
Talk:German submarine U-25 (1936)

message: "U-25 participated in five war patrols, sinking eight enemy ships and badly damaging one."
I have deleted the word "enemy" in this sentence, which features in para 2; as according to the table, four of the nine ships mentioned, belonged in January and February 1940, to neutral countries (Norway, Dennmark and Sweden).  RASAM (talk) 14:33, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:County Route G9 (California)

message: Regarding the proposed deletion, this is a brief article on a relatively obscure road, but the article has been requested by the California County Routes WikiProject.  It is also very new, so to mark it for deletion less than 24 hours after its creation seems very swift.  For these reasons I will remove the "prod" tag. Michael Patrick 20:35, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Blagger (video game)

message: The guy on the cover looks very much like one of the guys from Boris Vallejo's cover art for The Best of Leigh Brackett. --217.226.68.137 (talk) 23:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes indeed! Custardslice7 (talk) 18:59, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boris Vallejo Cover Art?
Talk:Conrad

message: Please don't use US/rest of the world differentiation as a primary classification when the topic is not US-related. It's irritating to people outside the US like me. --2A00:1028:8386:EC12:D8EE:B92:42E2:11F5 (talk) 06:55, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I, a Canadian, did that. It's not a US vs. everyone else thing. It's the fact that I intensely dislike tiny one (Canada) or two item (Antarctica) subsections. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Hung Hom station

message: Félix An (talk) 10:02, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Have the cross-border trains from Hung Hom been discontinued? 

message: The redirect Railway Approach has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Utopes (talk / cont) 06:17, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Railway Approach]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Kwu Tung station

message: I have moved the Kwu Tung station section from the Lok Ma Chau Spur Line as there is enough information and importance to warrant its own page. Durian Farmer (talk) 18:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved from Lok Ma Chau spur line
Talk:Sheung Shui station

message: With the opening of the Lok Ma Chau spur line, platform 1 at Sheung Shui Station has been divided into green and blue zones. Perhaps someone living nearby should take a shot of the platform and place it at the station layout section.--Alasdair 00:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll do it, but if someone can upload it sooner than I can then go on and do so, hehe. (But please forgive the photo's average quality.) --typhoonchaser 14:17, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's time to update the pictures 

message: I have again reverted an edit by User:Sing Movie that implies that trains will call at Kwu Tung station on the way to Lok Ma Chau. At this time, Kwu Tung station doesn't exist. Enabling works were apparently completed during construction of the Lok Ma Chau spur line, but there is no actual station there. Hence, it is misleading to show it as the next station up from Sheung Shui. Thank you, Citobun (talk) 12:51, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kwu Tung Station as next stop
Talk:Malcolm Marshall

message: What?
What in the name of God does "siffilated" mean? It doesn't respond to a call in Dictionary.com.
Do we have a source on his height?  "Roughly five-foot-nine-a-half" is a non sequitur as that's a pretty specific value. Lfh 20:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: () --Dweller (talk) 11:43, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source material 
Talk:Mill Island

message: Note that Canada also has a Mill Island, so we need a disambigation. -- Nic Roets 20:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On Google Earth I can not see anything but water at those coordinates. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.2.179.202 (talk) 00:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Island is not foun
Talk:Acerinox

message: seems to me that this fails Wikipedia:Notability (companies and corporations). Jon513 20:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Intuition (Jewel song)

message: Sections of this article are overly interpretive of this song for a reference format.  It's also not very NPOV.  I'll be making some edits soon. ka1iban 13:27, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I pretty much rewrote the entire lead paragraph and slashed half of the stuff. I think it's pretty fair now, so if there are no disputes, I will remove the NPOV tag in a week. TheKillerAngel 03:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major rework done 

message: Is there any information on what production company edited or did the visual effects on this video? I was impressed by the switching between footage that looked like video and film. --24.249.108.133 19:03, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video effects? 

message: While I love America's Next Top Model as much as anyone, the Miss J referred to in the song was Jennifer Lopez, not Miss J. Alexander. This song came out in 2003 (written in 2002). America's Next Top Model did not air until 2003. The timeline for this would not make sense. Plus, during the first cycle of ANTM, J. Alexander was not a judge on the show.Jonnyminogue (talk) 08:30, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miss J
Talk:Greatest Video Hits 1

message: Greatest Video Hits 1 was not the first video compilation.  I think it was Greatest Flix, a VHS released some time in 1981.  It has mostly the same contents as the later DVD, track order is quite different.  The video for Bicycle Race is quite different, all the nudity is obscured in the Greatest Flix version with video effects.  The Greatest Flix video for Killer Queen is a sequence of stills IIRC, with some slight biographical information text at the bottom of the screen, as opposed to the studio performance on the DVD. RB30DE 12:14, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have Greatest Flix in a box set (Box of Flix) released in 1991, it has a TOTP performance of Killer Queen as a bonus trackDuncanHill 13:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, the version in "Box of Flix" has the "slide show" Killer Queen video at the beginning and the TOTP performance with the bonus tracks at the end. boffy_b  —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 02:37, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greatest Flix 
Talk:Let Me Live

message: John Deacon sharing the lead vocals? Who said that? I don't think it's true at all!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.11.96.115 (talk) 21:40, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead vocals

message: So far as I can tell, this article has only one sentence that is backed up with a citation; the rest is unsupported assertion.
Even worse, the one remark that is given support---that the BBC banned the broadcast of this song---is not mentioned in the source material provided by the citation.  And even if it were mentioned, the website to which the citation refers is the work of an amateur and should not be used as Wikipedia source material.
In short, it seems to me that this article should be scrapped and redone altogether.
2602:306:BC58:5910:C9D6:76FC:2FEC:9962 (talk) 11:48, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abysmal citation
Talk:Thank God It's Christmas

message: Hi, am a bit new to discussion and how it works, but:
The article states that it the song is not that well-known. (relative)
I agree that it's not John Lennon's but here in Holland, were I live, the song peaks somewhere in the top20 around christmas in the top50 best xmas songs.
Just wondering if this is the case in other countries and if therefore we can state: it's actually is a pretty well-known song.
Best. (david)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.163.189.248 (talk) 15:49, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not so known? 

message: The first official release of this song after the single's was in 1985's "Complete Works" box set:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Complete_Works_(Queen_album)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.143.201.84 (talk) 16:36, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Released somewhere else 
Talk:A Winter's Tale (Queen song)

message: There was another release of the single - limited edition with christmas box cover. If anybody has reliable information about it and it worth to be added - please update the page with this alternate release. What I see for now is that the cover is from the standard edition and the track-list is from the limited edition. --Dliauchuk (talk) 00:57, 1 January 2010 (UTC)