lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Developed market

message: This list seems incomplete. Where is e.g. France and Norway?
The article only talks about Germany, not about West Germany and East Germany as separate. Why, then, does the map only include West Germany. This should be fixed before the map is re-inserted back into the article.  Ronline ✉ 09:42, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: These issues have since been fixed. -- Beland (talk) 22:03, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: My reading of the FTSE Group site is that the FTSE Group has one system for classifying countries.
The glossary has entries for 
* Developed Country
* Emerging Markets
* Frontier Markets
* Secondary emerging countries
In the glossary the Developed Country list - the date of production via view source is 2005 , but the FTSE group elevated South Korea and Israel to Developed status in 2008 and 2007. (Developed status)
In the more recent Country Classification http://www.ftse.com/Indices/Country_Classification/Downloads/FTSE_Country_Classification_Sept_08_update.pdf South Korea and Israel are included but here they are refered to as developed markets - but this list does not say developed country. It is a list in which the country "status" is defined as "developed"
The details of the criteria are on http://www.ftse.com/Indices/Country_Classification/index.jsp
On the  page itself it gives a general description - 
on the page itself it says:
"In 2003, FTSE conducted a widespread market consultation which resulted in the development of a framework and criteria for assigning countries based on:
* Economic size
* Wealth
* Quality of markets
* Depth and breadth of markets
FTSE applies this framework to conduct an annual review of the market status of all countries into Developed..."
The full list including the WB's GNI High Income bit is given in each of the regional bits eg: 
http://www.ftse.com/Indices/Country_Classification/Downloads/Asia_Pacific_Matrix_Sept_08.pdf.
So on the basis of this my argument is we can say the FTSE Group has a "developed country" list.
And that we can get the criteria for inclusion are the High Income + things  related to the Markets.  (Msrasnw (talk) 14:42, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FTSE Group Developed Country list 

message: i thought ftse and msci are the globally recognized index.
is this russell thing globally acknowledged???
msci=U.S ftse=U.k right?
where is russel??Hawkchoi (talk) 13:31, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russell global index. 

message: FTSE source is incorrectly quoted. Xx236 (talk) 06:52, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent changes 

message: The source (supplied in an old version) about Poland, states clearly: "Poland, currently an advanced emerging market, to be reclassified as a Developed market...The implementation of Poland and Kuwait's revised market status will commence from September 2018". HOTmag (talk) 10:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poland
Talk:Jefferson, Wisconsin

message: ==Untitled==
The red dot on the map of Wisconsin for this article should show where Jefferson is, right?  Well, it doesn't.  It's a county or so southwest of where Jefferson actually is.  I don't know how to fix that, though. :( Petronivs (talk) 15:39, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wisconsin Map

message: The red dot on the map of Wisconsin for this article should show where Jefferson is, right?  Well, it doesn't.  It's a county or so southwest of where Jefferson actually is.  I don't know how to fix that, though. :( Petronivs (talk) 15:39, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kewaunee Power Station

message: Probably should be noted that the article referencing the water leak in April 2006 is no longer a valid link.  Johnsorc 00:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

message: This says fourth nuclear power plant, but I can only find two previous La Crosse Boiling Water Reactor and Point Beach Nuclear Generating Station. Maybe they meant 4th power reactor, as Point Beach has two units and since La Crosse had one that would make Kewaunee the 4th used for commercial electricity. I think this infor came from EIA, but the source doesn't make it clear what the previous 3 were. NRC only lists 3 plants, 4 reactors.  --Dual Freq (talk) 01:52, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  4th? 

message: I thought the same thing. Isn't there only 3? 47.32.63.153 (talk) 18:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  3rd I think
Talk:CBeebies

message: Due to a grammar error please change "In March 2011, a on demand version of the network was launched in the US and is available on Xfinity." to "In March 2011, an on demand version of the network was launched in the US and is available on Xfinity." 77.102.213.146 (talk) 11:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Actualcpscm (talk) 13:46, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 March 2023 

message: CBeebies in USA is owned by Comcast, I think,u know how?, Will CBeebies can be owned by NBCUNIVERSAL Comcast, I’m using it for the future if they will buy it, I did this  2603:9008:1D08:F9D9:95B7:7448:2068:EAC7 (talk) 18:47, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not clear what edit you're asking us to make. — Trey Maturin™ 18:48, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 13 August 2023
Talk:CSC Media Group

message: Should we change the title to CSC Media Group Limited now that they use that name? Pathfinder2006 20:49pm 26th December 2007  —Preceding comment was added at 20:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Faze TV (TV channel)

message: Should "Sky do" -> "Sky does" ? 
I am not familiar with the channel and hence do not know if there's some type of avoidance of typical grammar rules.
:Hrm, I think I'll leave this to the grammar police, I have no idea either (I wrote that line...) --Kiand 23:33, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar 

message: Shouldn't this page and its' redirect be switched?  In other words, shouldn't the article be "Faze TV" and have "Faze TV (TV channel)" redirect to it? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 22:19, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move? 
Talk:Kiel, Wisconsin

message: Is there a relation to the german town Kiel? --Hans Eo (talk) 15:35, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I suspected so as the area is settled by German immigrants. This confirms it. Royalbroil 12:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where does the name come from? 
Talk:Game Network

message: This article is in serious need of a cleanup
I have tried to tidy up the language, but as I know nothing of the facts there is only so much I can do. really it needs to be written in a more formal tone and to have its facts checked and sources cited. – MrWeeble Talk Brit tv 18:52, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: A list of gurus is not important, and they are already listed (with questionable encyclopedic value) in the Game Guru article. However since I don't really care about this topic, I'm walking away from this one. --Fang Aili 18:20, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: The sections at Game_Guru#Where_are_the_Gurus_now.3F and Game_Network#Where_are_the_Gurus_now.3F are duplicate content. One of them should be deleted. I can't decide which so I am posting here. Looks like there is some other duplicate information too. Please clean it up. (Requestion 22:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about you leave them as the staff does differ slightly from that show and the channel itself. --Guru Larry 02:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  My reply is at Talk:Game_Guru#duplicate_content. (Requestion 16:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  duplicate content 

message: Hey, Do you think that Guru Larry (Larry Bundy Jr.) should have his own wikipedia page? Mrrusty (talk) 21:00, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable People
Talk:ITV News Channel

message: Bizarrely there is no mention of the closure of the channel in the main article.  It goes straight from talking about where it is produced to saying it could be relaunched.  Someone needs to add a paragraph about the channel closing, as it is a confusing read at the moment.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.111.199 (talk) 10:25, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Closure of channel

message: Isn't it ironic how ITV undertook an large scale engineering task in 2004 to ensure the ITV News Channel could broadcast on Freeview, only to close the channel less than 2 years later?
Shouldn't this be reflected in the article somehow?
Lee Stanley 15:29, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was the multiplex holder who did it, not ITV. ITV just bought the slot off them and put ITVNC (and later ITV4/CITV) in it as it became available across the UK. --Kiand 15:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Engineering task
Talk:ITV1

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved per WP:SNOW.  Brojam (talk) 19:41, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: ITV (TV channel) → 
Should we keep the current name, or rename it to ? MaiLab Cesko (talk) 4:48, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

text: support don't know why we should not do it, but i hope someone will make a argument against 2006toyotacorrola (talk) 09:04, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

text: when they first changed the name from itv1 to itv in 2013 they changed the wikipedia title why not now 2407:7000:98C3:4D00:70F3:798:954D:B140 (talk) 09:51, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

text: Speedy WP:SNOW support Per above XxLuckyCxX (talk) 13:29, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

text: Speedy WP:SNOW Support As with all comments above, I think this meets the snowball effect because I believe it is best practice to use the current name (in this case) of the channel. GCunknown (talk) 14:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

text: Support - Makes it easier to find. Blanchey (talk) 18:05, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

text: yep we should Марк Кор. (talk) 19:05, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Where it says ‘unified itv branding’ and ‘adopted itv continuity in 2020’ should it be changed to itv1? As in 2002, that is what it was known as although in 2020 it will still known as itv so should that stay? Blanchey (talk) 10:01, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Itv1 

message: Didn't the IBA do the 1989 generic idents? Can't find a trace of the listed ITV Association anywhere on the internet.FusionSub (talk) 12:07, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  ITV Association
Talk:Onalaska, Wisconsin

message: The historic place known as the La Crosse County School of Agriculture and Domestic Economy no longer exists.  That building was torn down years ago.  An old façade from the building (when it was a high school and middle school) was attached to the new high school building.  Red bricks from "Old Aggie" were sold by the Onalaska Area Historical Society, as souvenirs.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.42.60.27 (talk) 08:40, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  La Crosse County School of Agriculture 
Talk:Kerrang! TV

message: This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kerrang! TV article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This talk page is a perfect example of why stupid kids and teenagers shouldn't be editing Wikipedia. They can't even follow the basic rules of the website. No wonder the Background section of this article, like Wikipedia as a whole, is a complete farce. 
It is written like a fan retrospective rather than an unbiased, neutral, fact-based, chronological explanation of the channel's history with co-responding citations. I've tagged the page accordingly. Thecleanerand (talk) 19:35, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background; This article needs a complete rewrite
Talk:Ladysmith, Wisconsin

message: Is there any reference for the claim for the origin of the name Ladysmith ? The date (1900) is suspiciously close to the Siege of Ladysmith (ended February 1900), which was a major headline-making event at the time and a matter of passion for many British Americans.Wefa 16:55, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name origin

message: To the south of Ladysmith on Hwy 27 is a bunch of buildings with a aign that says Grant Town. What is that about? Why is it there?
-- DMahalko (talk) 02:34, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the history of Grant Town? 

message: "It was originally named Flambeau Falls, after the Ojibwe name for the area, Gakaabikijiwanan ("of cliffed rapids")."
This makes no sense. Flambeau is French for "torch"; it has nothing whatsoever to do with cliffs or rapids. I don't think the Ojibwe name could be in any way linked with the name Flambeau Falls. Or does "after" here simply refer to time? Even if so, it is badly worded. Kelisi (talk) 07:15, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  >>>Flambeau Falls
Talk:Men & Motors

message: Most of this work is obviously copied from another website, I will start to re-word it in the next few days. If anybody wants to help please do. AppleRobin 17:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied from external source 
Talk:Pop (British and Irish TV channel)

message: add transformers (G1) to former programming. this series aired in the following
2016, 2018, 2022.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.70.99.67 (talk) 21:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Transformers 

message: In the upcoming programming section, add Kung Fu Wa!.
Kung Fu Wa!<ref?https://kidscreen.com/2022/04/26/new-international-sales-for-chinese-animated-series-kung-fu-wa/</ref> 5.151.178.34 (talk) 05:52, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 29 April 2022 

message: I Have a Message for you Pop! Please add The Cuphead Show it will air 90.194.207.234 (talk) 19:48, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request 2 January 2023 

message: New Shows Coming on Pop on 2 January 2023 called The Cuphead Show and Moley will air at times 13:00 - 13:30 and 17:00 - 17:30 90.194.207.234 (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2 New Shows Coming on Pop in January 

message: The Cuphead Show is Cancelled but it moves to 17 April 2023 90.194.207.234 (talk) 11:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cancelled 

message: This is the second time this article has been edited to state that Toons & Tunes launched on October 2002 instead of May 2003, and I'm curious as to where exactly this claim's source is.
All sources I've seen would suggest 2003 as the real launch date:
https://forums.digitalspy.com/discussion/63582/toons-tunes-launching-today
https://www.c21media.net/news/chart-show-looks-to-build-pop-channel/
If anyone has any contradicting sources please share, others wise I think we should change this change it back to 29th May 2003. SIDER**2 (talk) 20:44, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toons & Tunes launch date. 

message: In April, POP have TV shows from Tiny POP that will air from 6AM to 4PM every weekends, she to moving to POP Player
InsertChannelNameHere does not know yet! 2A02:C7C:C826:3A00:5D62:A63C:91:4329 (talk) 16:43, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tiny POP Shows on POP In April 2024 (6AM to 4PM)
Talk:Comedy Central Extra

message: Please do not merge articles without consensus. For what's worth, I think they should definetly be kept seperate. The JPS 17:19, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: With the brand expanding into new markets it may be worth moving this article, which is currently focused on the UK and Irish channel, to Comedy Central Extra (UK and Ireland) and creating a brief summary article on Comedy Central Extra covering all variations, similar to Disney Channel (International) or Syfy Universal. Although it may be more useful to cover all Comedy Central channels instead (Comedy Central#International), like Nickelodeon around the world and List of MTV channels. - Jasmeet_181 (talk) 11:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split UK and Ireland
Talk:Sky Sci-Fi

message: Who owns the Sci-Fi Channel in the UK. it is my understanding from looking at the website that it is owned by NBC Universal via a subsidery called Sci Fi Channels Europe LLC (see the contact email addresses here and here – all at the nbcuni.com domain and the copyright notice at the bottom of the www.scifiuk.com website).
User:Mistress Selina Kyle has edited the infobox to say that is independent and I seem to recall hearing that Vivendi Universal had sold it (way before the merger) but if so - what is with the email addys, can anyone give more authoritive information? – MrWeeble Talk Brit tv 11:59, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership 

message: Company number: FC019016
 BR003277
 Name, Address: 	SCI-FI CHANNEL EUROPE L.L.C.
 OXFORD HOUSE
 76 OXFORD STREET
 LONDON
 W1D 1BS
 Date Open: 	01/11/1995
 Closed(Y): 	 
 Type of Business: 	OPERATION OF CABLE AND SATELLITE TELIVISION CHANNEL
Parent:
 Name & Registered Office:
 SCI-FI CHANNEL EUROPE L.L.C.
 THE PRENTICE- HALL CORPORATION
 SYSTEM INC. 32 LOCKERNAN SQUARE
 SUITE L-100 DOVER
 DELAWARE 19004 USA
 Company No. FC019016
Looks like they ceased to trade?? LoopZilla 12:11, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Companies House information. 

message: Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here . Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. --Maniwar (talk) 02:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Centralized TV Episode Discussion 
Talk:Dick Latvala

message: ye read headline —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.146.150.24 (talk) 21:25, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Latvala is a Finnish surname. J.S.Salonen 23:19, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

text: Wikipedia is uncensored.  The quote was rather noteworthy, as of the first 20 hits on Google Groups, 7 are in reference to the dead.net post.  Most of the other first hits are in reference to his death.   The recently deceased Bobby Fischer also has a Wiki section of anti-Jewish remarks.  Nice invoking Godwin's Law in your first comment.  68.45.106.216 (talk) 04:45, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I have no idea why you think that "I" am not satisfied.  This information has been in the article for 2 years with no objections other than yours.  The article was fine at it is, and it will stay that way.  Also, the fact that Latvala is deceased actually makes the information more easily able to stay in the article, because there are stricter laws with regards to what one can say about the living than the deceased.  68.45.106.216 (talk) 12:52, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Also, Bobby Fischer, the "notorious anti-semite" as you call him, was Jewish.  The paragraph about Latvala's statements in no way takes a position about the comments, which is why it doesn't fall under [See Wiki Neutral Point of View Guideline].  It simply mentions his comments and says he apologized for them.  At no point does the article take a position on the content of his statements. 68.45.106.216 (talk) 12:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  what country does he originate from? 

message: This bio could use serious help. Thanks, --70.109.223.188 (talk) 17:47, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced material
Talk:Wadih el-Hage

message: I added a link to the PBS piece from which most of this article seems to have been lifted.
LDH 06:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Currently, the following statement appears on in the Arrest section with a list of names: "The Nairobi house was raided on August 21, 1998. El-Hage's address book, captured at the time, contained the following names:"
The list of names in the address book does not meet Wikipedia's guidelines due to lacking a reliable source and relevancy to article.  Unless the content can be reconciled to meet the guidelines, I will plan to remove the statement and list of names within a week's time.Djrun (talk) 15:41, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Arrest (List of names in address book) 
Talk:Sky Real Lives

message: The web url given in the info box is http://www.skytravel.co.uk/.  Clicking on it, gives a screen to book a trip, but doesn't say anything about a TV channel.  The only thing related to TV is "TV Offers", which is just another "opportunity" to book a trip.  The link should either be fixed to the relevant page, or removed entirely.  --rob 08:45, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: it is a pointless site, but it is the offical site for the TV channel, even if it has not information about it. Go to sky.com and select sky travel from the drop down and that is where you end up. MrWeeble Talk Brit tv 13:06, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: So shouldn't we list the more specific/relevant url then?  --rob 14:01, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Web link, is just a travel ad 

message: The link to 'The Tube' leads to a disambiguation page.  Linking it to 'The Tube (TV show)' would link it to a music show.  Any thoughts? Trixovator 17:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: To be more specific, there is no page for the Sky Travel show 'The Tube' on Wikipedia.  The tube is a show about the London Underground. Trixovator 22:26, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct link has been added to disambiguation page.  I am about to add it as the link from this page.  Thanks if anybody noticed this. Trixovator 22:31, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Tube link 

message: I know there will be some of you who will believe that the programming part looked good before had but, it came off as advertising the channels above anything else what with the channel numbers being placed with it. Also I can't see them Programmes being popular but if someone produces some proof I'll happily change it back. --AJFurnell 11:11, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Programming 
Talk:Anthem of the Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic

message: Please join discussion at Talk:Anthem of the Tajik Soviet Socialist Republic#Discuss inclusion of lyrics.--Nø (talk) 10:29, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion of lyrics? 

message: The "midi" file shown at the bottom of the article is actually a mp3. we need an actual MIDI.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:5CC:C480:1260:C1EB:371A:BBD2:9E5 (talk) 22:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  MIDI File 
Talk:NBC Europe

message: Speaking as the person who created the article in the first place, I have no objections in renaming it to it's more modern name as long as the bit about Super Channel is preserved, and that Super Channel becomes a redirect to the new name of the page, and that the bit about the unrelated former Canadian service is adjusted to take the new article-title into account.
:but NBC Europe (a redirect to Super Channel) has a page history.
The only page-history is the changing of the type of redirect, so it does not matter about overwriting the history.
Ae-a 16:54, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: Move request fulfilled. Rob Church Talk 22:12, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Outcome

message: I changed the ownership info back to "General Electric." The primary pan-European service known as NBC Europe (the subject of 99% of this entry) ceased broadcasting in 1998, when it was still owned by GE. The fact that a minor German spin-off channel also known as NBC Europe was, for a short time, owned by NBC Universal is hardly significant.
WorldWide Update 22:38, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to bring up an old discussion but I found this: . It says that NBC and Credit Lyonnais held 75% of SuperChannel and Virgin held 25%. Alexj2002 11:21, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  NBC Europe's Owner 

message: I remember Super Channel, NBC Super Channel and NBC Europe, but no NBC Channel without the Super- when was that supposed to be? 212.63.56.233 (talk) 16:23, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  NBC Channel?