lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Truth About Killer Dinosaurs

message: Who will win? I'm guessing Ankylosaurus.61.230.78.58 02:18, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tarbosaurus vs Ankylosaurus

message: Here are some VERY GOOD screenshots: 
Can't understand the text though, it's in another language. 61.230.90.241 06:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Screenshots

message: I recently visited the BBC's official site on TTAKD  and they display it as an "ankylosaur". Also I was under the impression that Akylosaurus was a North American dinosaur, not mongolian. the gallery on the site shows a creature too small to be A. magniventris. could anyone verify this?_Dragon Helm 02:58, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Akylosaurus''?

message: Hi - it seems that some 'bald' statements are made here, as if fact, yet there has been some pretty heavy debating over at Tyrannosaurus. Latest thinking on 'bite force' and 'speed' of this theropod may not be accurately reported here. - Ballista 05:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statistics 

message: To be frank, this programs sounds idiotic.  Of what use is the information that a T. rex with a steel skull could "crush a car?"  T. rex did not have a steel skull, there were no cars in Late Cretaceous North America, and even if there were, T. rex would have obtained no benefit from running around crushing them.
Likewise, what value is the information that a Triceratops with a resin skull would not be able to charge predators, as its skull would shatter?  Few Triceratops were likely to have had resin skulls.
These "who will win?" match-ups are strictly for power-obsessed teenaged boys, and so sound more like something for MTV than a program purporting to be scientific.
Hmmm, you have a point... Dora Nichov 23:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Validity and Usefulness? 

message: Does anyone know the film budget on this? And how much money they ended up spending on it? TeePee-20.7 (talk) 02:31, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budget 

message: Tyrannosaurus Rex : scientifically false
Tyrannosaurus rex : scientifically true  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.105.86.220 (talk) 07:19, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tyrannosaurus Rex -----> Tyrannosaurus rex 

message: I highly doubt that ankylosaur was Pinacosaurus. In the 2nd episode, it fights a Tarbosaurus. Tarbosaurus lived in the Maastrichtian, while Pinacosaurus lived in the Campanian (and Velociraptor lived in both the Campanian and Maastrichtian). Tarchia was the Mongolian ankylosaur that lived in the Maastrichtian, so I think that ankylosaur in the 2nd episode was Tarchia.
--98.223.2.99 (talk) 17:59, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mongolian Ankylosaur 

message: The article claims that the velociraptor vs ankylosaur episode had a second round where a group of velociraptor attack an adult ankylosaur and fail. I've never been able to find this part of the episode. Hresvelgr4 (talk) 05:45, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible error in article
Talk:Race for Your Life, Charlie Brown

message: *No mention of the screw-ups in continuity?  There are two points in the movie where the weather suddenly changes from summer weather to winter weather.  I understand that it takes place in the wilds of Oregon, but isn't this a little too extreme? Eyeball kid (talk) 04:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, I think that'd be something for IMDB to do. BTW if it seems like I do a lot of disruptive editing, that's just the idiots at my school. I'm not the one doing those. 96.27.252.150 (talk) 01:37, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: No mention?

message: I agree that the part about this movie being rated PG is erroneous.  I was ten years old when this movie was released, and I remember the commercials.  My memory isn't the world's best, I think I would have remembered if a "Peanuts" film was rated PG.  Besides, I checked out the link on YouTube cited in the previous post.  That's the commercial I remember, and it definitely says the movie was rated G.  Unless the editors of Wikipedia can provide proof to the contrary, that section in the article should be changed.97.73.64.165 (talk) 01:34, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I might also point out that the editors of this article provide no documentation for the claim that the film was originally rated "PG."  Doesn't this violate Wikipedia's policy?67.233.88.132 (talk) 20:28, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The scenes described in the article that supposedly gave the film its supposed PG rating are ridiculous.  Disney's The Rescuers and Pete's Dragon released the same year had far darker and more frightening content than all of the "Peanuts" films combined.  The claim that this is regarded as the "darkest" Peanuts film is silly on its own, since the one that followed, Bon Voyage, Charlie Brown (and Don't Come Back!) (1980) is far darker and more sinister.  I'm going to go ahead and remove all of these claims with the right that grants their improbability, as well as the lack of sources. T.W. (talk) 17:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't remember it being rated PG.
Talk:Snoopy Come Home

message: I removed the following quote from the article:
"The songs it whould be Jerry Goldsmith score but was Rejected by Richard M. Sherman and Robert B. Sherman."
That statement makes absolutely NO sense!97.73.64.152 (talk) 02:46, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  What??? 

message: After some of the headlines in the article List of minor characters in Peanuts have changed, some broken links in this article should be fixed (for example the names of Lila and "annoying girl"). Someone else must do it, because when I tried it three times, it was declared "vandalism" and my edit was reverted . I was finally adviced in my talk page to "discuss [my] changes on the appropriate talk page for the article before continuing to make edits" . --82.181.41.96 (talk) 17:52, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken links 

message: Before, Snoopy met Woodstock for the best friends like Laurel and Hardy for the happiness for many years ago.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tlj1989 (talk • contribs) 05:55, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snoopy and Woodstock are best friends 

message: The opening sentence should start " Snoopy Come Home (often stylized with various punctuation marks) " to reflect the variety of naming we have found. We could even have a section listing the common title stylizations. I won't make the changes myself due to my conflicts of interest. --Nat Gertler (talk) 14:24, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reflecting the title stylization 

message: After all the discussion above, it strikes me that the blog post I made about the punctuation of the title might actually make a good entry in the external link section. I'm not going to put it in myself, due to my conflict of interest on it, but I leave the suggestion here for others to consider and act on as they see fit. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 21:53, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible external link
Wikipedia talk:T1 and T2 debates

message: For anyone still watching this, I'm moving for the repealing of criterion for speedy deletion T1. I invite your opinions and discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Removal_of_T1_redux. Dcoetzee 03:07, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Repealing of CSD T1
Talk:Fair Haven, New York

message: I find the additions about violence against vacationers in 1982 to be suspect. Stepp-Wulf 02:44, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Active citizenship

message: I believe engaged citizenship should be merged into this article as it covers very similar content and scope, with this article being the older one and would benefit from (althought a small amount) of additional content.  Jamzze (talk) 04:05, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Support: Strongly overlapping content. SchreiberBike | ⌨  04:16, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Peter Lynn

message: A Google search for the terms "Peter Lynn" and kites turned up a whopping 166,000 hits.  Looking at a few of the entries, it was readily apparent that Peter Lynn is notable within the kite making community. -- DS1953 talk 02:55, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This page currently has the banner "This article appears to be written like an advertisement. (October 2013)"
Is this issue now resolved?  It reads like a general biographical page to me.  Can the banner be removed?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.249.52 (talk) 16:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There has been no substantial change to the article since the banner was added by . Perhaps that user could explain in more detail what changes they think are necessary.-gadfium 20:53, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

text: It's OK, but I think the article lacks more inline citations.--HCPUNXKID 14:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisment?
Talk:Riverwind

message: ReyBrujo - Regarding some of the links in this article that refer to characters not actually listed on List of Dragonlance characters; I'm kind of new at editing and would appreciate some input-might it be best to note this issue in that article's talk page, or will these links be weeded out entirely from this article? Specifically, Riverwind's children don't have actual references in Wikipedia that I can find. --Ipso-De-Facto 09:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there, if you are feeling bold, go to the list and add their names in the Heroes section, along with some information if possible. That way, the next time someone clicks on the links they will be referred to the correct section in the list. Otherwise, someone else can do that. But it is always better to just try, any error you may make can easily be corrected by any of the editors working with Dragonlance articles. -- ReyBrujo 16:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I judged this article on 7 criteria:
#Well-written: Neutral
#Factually accurate: Pass
#Broad: Pass
#Neutrally written: Pass
#Stable: Pass
#Well-referenced: Pass
#Images: Pass
Congratulations, it passes!  The prose could be better, but it's certainly not bad, and I feel that that and references are the biggest differences between GAC and FAC anyway.  Thank you for writing another good fantasy article! --PresN 16:14, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks to those who helped and PresN for the review. Good prose is always hard to achieve, as it is not my native language, but thanks to many users who clean it up it becomes average. Thanks again! -- ReyBrujo 17:45, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GAC 

message: Since this article has no reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability, I have requested a review of its Good Article status at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Riverwind/1.--Gavin Collins (talk) 13:44, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The discussion has been closed and the article delisted. Note that this is only an assertion that the article does not meet the good article criteria, not an assertion that the article is not notable or verifiable. Geometry guy 17:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:GAR|Good article reassessment]]

message: At the time of writing, no reliable secondary sources providing evidence of notability for the fictional character Riverwind are cited in this article. The article has many primary references (citations from the author & publishers), but none that are reliable seconary sources. I request that the notability template be restored to this article.--Gavin Collins (talk) 10:22, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability is disputed
Talk:Greg Millen

message: How in God's name did you ever get a job with that stupid voice of yours.
You were never a good goalie,   Mclennan and you are on the same path.
You are so full of yourself, your mates can't deal with your crap.
Best thing for you is RETIRE please. Free Speech Right 156.34.174.224 (talk) 21:35, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How annoying you are
Talk:Dutch cheese markets

message: Also Cheses is not a word I found that in the writing  — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Big White Elephant (talk • contribs) 20:59, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have heavily altered the following text in the article:
Probably the most popular cheese market, and Edam cheese certainly seems to be the most popular Dutch cheese available outside of mainland Europe. If you do not mind the fact that you will be in a town with a population which has only three surnames, and which is notorious for people operating outside of the tax system, then this is the place to be! The cheeses are still brought to the market by horse-drawn carriages and boat. The cheese market takes place in July and August on Wednesday mornings from 10:30 until 12:30. Best not to go with any close relations, you might end up marrying them, or worse  still accidentally selling them on the black market in a seemingly friendly round of handjeklap!
If anyone objects then feel free to revert, it doesn't bother me. MichaelBillington 02:56, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pruning possible vandalism

message: *Removed the Edam.com site since it actually serves to drive traffic to a store. 
*Added government, trade-association, or cultural group citations to verify and support some of the claims in the text, for each cheese market.  Except for Woerden, for which I couldn't yet find such.  Help?
--Lexein (talk) 02:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No more spammy links
Talk:House of Rock

message: Is the series available on DVD or VHS? Can you download clips off the internet?
:http://www.amazon.co.uk/House-Rock-Stuart-Evans/dp/B000050GQT
:http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/music/microsites/0-9/4music/houseofrock.html
::- 81.179.112.29 21:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:Beuronese Congregation

message: There is a distinctive artistic style associated with the Buronese Congregation. I don't know much about it, but I think it ought to be addressed. (Unsigned post by :User:Trinite on 28 May 2006)
:The "Bavarian-Assyrian" Beuronese style AFAIK is linked mostly to Beuron Abbey, and is dealt with - briefly - there. HeartofaDog 09:51, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lake Vermilion

message: I am interested in the claim that Lake Vermillion was one of NGS's top ten most scenic lakes in the 40's. I was searching for an actual source, but so far no luck. Plenty of tourism websites for the area claim it, so I don't doubt it's true, but there is some ambiguity. http://www.boathouselodging.com/ and http://www.lakeplace.com/resorts/mn/northern/ both put it in the top 40 most scenic lakes.
--Greyduk 20:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Canyon Lake (Texas)

message: If there is an info box for this type of thing, I would suggust moving Fast Facts there. --Midnightcomm 03:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree.  They need to be merged together instead.  I'll add the merge templates. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 04:02, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bill Davison

message: Why did it take so long to get an item on this major jazz figure?
-jim denham
:I guess the set of people who write articles on major jazz figures and the set of Wikipedians doesn't overlap much. Feel free to edit the article though, I see you've added a lot. Please remember to sign your posts too with a "--~~~~", without the quotes or just click the button at the top 3 to the right of the trumpet. --Rajah 04:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Jim you might want to check Wikipedia:WikiProject Jazz. Last I checked there were more interested in smooth jazz or at earliest hard bop, but anyone interested can check it out.--T. Anthony 12:08, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mt. Hebron High School

message: There's quite a lot of student mythology at this school.  Being a student there, you hear a lot about things like a 'Third Story Pool', when in fact the school only has two stories.  Perhaps a small section on that?  Karl 02:53, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mythology
Talk:Edward Macnaghten, Baron Macnaghten

message: Perhaps I have expressed myself badly. At Wikipedia, we don't use a postnominal for a baronetcy with peers, see  Wikipedia:WikiProject Peerage#Content (under Notes). In all other cases it is of course written out in the intro. ~~ Phoe talk 18:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not yet looked at the guidelines but shall do.  I understand while the prefix (Sir) is not used but see not reason why the post-nominal bart. shouldn't be. --Couter-revolutionary 18:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know the specific reason, but one I see, is that many peers have a bundle of postnominals and therefore the not absolutely necessary ones are left out to avoid postnominal-monsters. And if we do not use it at some, then we should not use it also at everyone. If you want to know it exactly, you should ask perhaps on Wikipedia:WikiProject Peerage or Wikipedia:WikiProject Baronetcies. Greetings ~~ Phoe talk 19:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's a slightly unhelpful answer but its one of those - that's just the way it is answers. There is no 'rule' it is simply convention that peers don't. I've seen a variety of reasons posited which are plausible enough. You can find any number of examples to backup the point pick a random monument to a famous baronet and peer like   Alci12 11:53, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Postnominal
Talk:Sheila Kuehl

message: Probably need to say something about the fact that Kuehl was the original source of the misinformation regarding a dramatic rise in domestic violence on Super Bowl Sunday. --TimeDog 20:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source of the Super Bowl Sunday Myth 

message: I there public information on Ms. Kuehl's partner?  Is she in a long term relationship? 24.253.28.149 (talk) 05:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Domestic Partner? 

message: This article has an excessive amount of detail, is not well organized and needs significant revisions.--JumpLike23 (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with the article 

message: I see the summary in the article references  her “year” at Harvard Law School as 1994. She graduated with me with her JD degree in the class of 1978. 
I don’t know where the 1994 came from, or what it refers to, but it should be deleted. Now, I haven’t kept up with her that much, so perhaps she was a lecturer at the law school in 1994, but I don’t think so. In any event, just sticking 1994 into her biography doesn’t do anything. 😊 63.155.120.206 (talk) 21:49, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sheila Kuehl’s Time at Harvard Law School
Talk:Foxtel

message: The link to the petition against advertising on Foxtel is blacklisted for some reason. I have no idea how to deal with such a problem but it should at the very least be discussed here and reference to it made in the article. The petition can be found here: http :// www. petitiononline. com/ ls1203/ petition. html Nick carson (talk) 04:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the blacklisting is appropriate. An encyclopedia article is not the place for links to petitions. Barrylb (talk) 06:05, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Blacklisted petition

message: Is content the same on both delivery systems?
Is cost the same on both delivery systems?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.214.18.240 (talk) 05:50, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You get extra channels on cable in some areas (like you get FTA on cable in Perth but not satellite), but it costs the same no matter what, I think. - Mark 11:08, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wanted to know: 

message: There used to be a list of channels available on Wikipedia showing Foxtel's channels, but due to Wikipedia's policies, it's since been removed. As I think this information is relevant to readers, I've posted a link to a Wiki with a listing of Foxtel's channels; however, the list could do with some updating, if anyone here is able to contribute. Wyp (talk) 12:07, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Foxtel Channel Listing
Talk:E Is for Extinction

message: Is it really fair to call the Legacy Virus cure a Deus Ex Machina? The X-Folks were working on it for HOW long? They just didn't go to Doctor Strange and have him cast a spell or go back in time and beat the cure out of Stryfe.
Lots42 00:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?? 

message: The "secondary mutation" concept was not something introduced by Morrison. Chris Claremont had already used the conceit in the opening arc of X-Treme X-Men to explain Henry McCoy's transition into the feline form.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skandha (talk • contribs) 00:50, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary Mutations 

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:24, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - needs more references and expansion of out-of-universe material. (Emperor (talk) 17:55, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required
Talk:The Osterman Weekend

message: It seems that the plot was just copied from the article about the film or vice versa. On a board on another site about the film I read that the plot of the novel was quite different in certain aspects especially towards the end. Could someone who owns the novel please clarify? 88.75.153.9 (talk) 22:15, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot of the novel same as plot of the film?
Talk:Battle of the Square

message: Excellent new article. Glad to see it! Takk - Williamborg 03:43, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Are there any literature—preferably before 2006 when the article was made—that is supporting this name? According to the sources I've seen (quick check), this encounter is referred to as the Battle in the Marketplace (p. 42), Battle of the Market-Place (2nd page of chapter 8), Market-place battle (3rd page of chapter 2), etc. I just want to make sure this name, "Battle of the Square", is not made up by the creator of this article; I've got some Google hits since 2006, but I suspect those can be a result of this article.
:UPDATE: I found a book from 2004 which calls this battle "Market Square Battle (p. 134); I've yet to find anything from before 2006 which calls it merely "Battle of the Square", "Square Battle" or anything alike. Imonoz (talk) 01:37, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battle of the Square
Talk:Bishop Cotton Boys' School

message: VERY good article. Lacks references. If they were there then article would be a "B". Look at La martiniere lucknow to see what refs look like. Oh ... the name. Consider adding the location in brackets after the name to differentiate this from other BC schools in India. Victuallers 08:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: What's with the 'Random Link' subtopic, and what does that have to do with Fermat's Last Theorem --Rejnal 03:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Random Link? 

message: Citation required. Cowdrey left India at the age of 5 and I can find no evidence that he attended Bishop Cotton Boys School. If he did it would have been as a very young boy, and very very briefly.PaddyBriggs 09:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Colin Cowdrey]]

message: I always thought the words were:
"Vivat Pettigrew" or perhaps "Vivat Pettigrew!.."
Can someone please verify.  Thanks  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gseshadri (talk • contribs) 01:21, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pettigrew house song - "Viva" or "Vivat"? 

message: Most of this section is good, but some of the sentences seem anecdotal, unverified, and unbecoming of an encyclopaedic article. Fire (talk) 19:15, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup of section "Origins" 