Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Harro5

message: :Please note the instructions about where to post, since RFC pages soon degenerate into chaos if people don't: "Users editing other sections should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view." "All signed comments and talk not directly related to a vote or endorsement go on the talk page ... Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page. 
:I have moved the comment below here from my "Outside view" section.
The Issue here
I am not a student of St Michael's and this page was, as I said, to let out my frustrations. I believe that those comments came out as a result of others modifying the page and then having their hours of hard work reverted by Harro5 without discussion.
It all comes down to old school rivalries. And St Michael's and Caulfield have had them for years. The issue we must contend with is allowing a person who clearly dislikes his rival schools have a say (and promote biast with it) on other pages content.
Speaking of which, even while this complaint is ongoing, Harro5 has reverted back changes made to the schools portal (an updated feature picture). At one stage he also removed Maintainers/contributors who wanted a more active role.
This behaviour is obviously inappropriate and the language used by others towards him shows the general anger experiened by both students and non-students.
I used the Caulfield page as an example to show how when unwatched his POV ideas can go under the radar without being seeen. As you said, you need to watch very closely. However, we saw from the beginning how his modifications of fully sourced St Michael's content were clearly biast. And we believe this was intentional (the discussion pages make that fairly obvious).
I think you need to be very careful in making Harro5 any sort of official in relation to schools. What I am trying to make clear is how he does not show signs of critical thinking in his modifications, and holds his love for his school very close to his heart.
Please consider this when making your decisions about the ways in which Harro5 has gone about modifying content.
220.253.48.90 23:10, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: P. S. Feel free to move the post above back to the project page if you like, but if you do, please put it in your own section, date it, and indicate that it's in response to my Outside view. Bishonen | talk 00:11, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Apologes. 220.253.48.90 00:27, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Please note the instructions on the page

message: This group is now actively muscling in on the Schools Wikiportal, in an attempt to kick me off the page and run St Michaels content everywhere. On this issue I will stand firm. See discussion at Portal talk:Schools/Showcase articles, User talk:Beyondcapricorn and Portal talk:Schools. I am most worried by this comment - "You should be thanking us for including you, not biting back by claiming you somehow have more right to this portal." - by Beyondcapricprn made here. This group is looking to infiltrate the portal to spite me and also to cement their position as a leading clique advocating vandalism, no-discussion-required-if-others-disagree, and using votes to band together to get their way. Worrying stuff, and something which should be headed off by administrators. I'm resilient, and don't plan to give up and leave Wikipedia, but can see myself requesting arbitration against this whole group soon if they continue on their current path. Feel free to comment. Harro5 09:05, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Portal:Schools|Schools Portal]] 

message: This RFC seems to have been formally abandoned by several users who have removed their signatures as certifyers, and informally also by 220.253.48.90, who has stopped answering questions and, apparently, trying to do anything about the vexed certification issue. It's been more than 48 hours, I'm delisting it now. If Harro5 asks me to, I will also delete it; otherwise, for now, it's being kept. Bishonen|talk 21:32, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisting