lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Green's function (many-body theory)

message: Sorry about the garbage; these started out as TeX notes, and there were a few tags in it that I forgot to translate to Wikipedia markup. Everything is fixed now.
The page was marked as "possible copyvio", but these notes are my own, loosely based upon a couple of books that I will add to the references presently. Stevvers 02:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Added the references.Stevvers 03:25, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Should we also add a section about non-equilibrium Green's function and Keldysh formalism here? --EbbeSand (talk) 14:46, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nonequilibrium Green's functions 

message: This article is a good start but reads like a list of equations, not a coherent introduction to Green's functions in the context of many-body physics. Is anyone still editing this? In particular, I think it would be nice to treat zero temperature and finite temperature (Matsubara or Keldysh) Green's functions in separate subsections of this article. A lot of the equations here are probably also beyond the ideal scope of this article. --Evanescent7 (talk) 00:52, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anyone still working on this?
Talk:LG Chocolate (VX8500)

message: Does the LG VX8500 have a speakerphone?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironman04 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

message: I think the article has been sufficiently altered by now that it no longer reads like an advertisement. Both the positive and negative public reception to the phone is addressed. --Randall00 16:14, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement

message: There are currently THREE pages on the Chocolate phone: this one, the LG VX-8500 page (which, to be honest, is just a short page with just technical info), and the LG KG800 (Chocolate) page, which I think describes the GSM version.  Can they somehow be blended into one article?? SKS2K6 02:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have redirected the LG VX-8500 page to this one, as this one has more information.  As for the LG KG800 (Chocolate) page, I don't know the protocol for dealing with articles about similar models of electronics, so I left it alone. ... discospinster talk 16:22, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Organization

message: The original Chocolate phone was actually a CDMA phone, because that's what Korea's network is.  It was then changed into a GSM phone for Europe, then changed back to a CDMA phone (or rather, the original CDMA one was heavily modified) for its current version here. SKS2K6 04:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: To really make this article complete, it would be nice to have more information on the camera. Who makes the camera and the chip, what options does it have, etc. Deepfryer99 (talk) 16:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Camera

message: is it true tat tis phone is prepaid now  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.195.43.24 (talk) 07:01, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  prepaid?? 

message: * I was just wondering if it might be a good idea to combine the VX8500 & VX8550 pages into one page since one is an upgrade of the other at least until the pages are of substantial length.
* Would it be better to combine all of the Chocolate mobile phone pages or at least have something about their similarities or should they just be left to their series sets such as the way they are grouped in the LG series box at the bottom of the page?-Darthjarek (talk) 06:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Combining Chocolates
Talk:W. T. Preston

message: Does anyone know enough to start a snagboat article?  I know congress allotted the Washignton USCoE the money to build the Skagit in 1881, which means there must have been a congressional effort for snagboats.  The Montgomery  in Alabama seems to be similar, and may have been funded in a similar way.  Nicholas SL Smith (talk) 01:22, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snagboat Article?
Talk:Charles L. Reason

message: This article doesn't specify which "West Indies" it is referring to - the current link redirects to the Caribbean. -- VGF11 02:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguity

message: Someone could find more info and references for that which is already in the article at this site:
http://www.math.buffalo.edu/mad/special/reason_charles_l.html
I'd do it myself, but I don't have time right now. -- VGF11 03:15, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind, I found time to add this reference. -- VGF11 04:14, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info/References
Talk:Union Oyster House

message: The coordinates need the following fixes:
* On online map sites (google, bing, mapquest) the coordinates place the oyster house on the corner of New Chardon and Bowker, close but on the wrong side of government center. The actual location is southeast of the current coordinates.
RobHar (talk) 15:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error 

message: I hate to be a dick, but theres no evidence for any of these claims -- I know this restaurant claims the oldest-restaurant, for examnple -- but theyve never backed up the claim.  Anyone got a REAL history?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.91.75.149 (talk) 19:10, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I know that in 1972 when friends were working there, they claimed to be the second oldest restaurant in America. What happened to what was the oldest at that time? When did the Union Oyster House begin claiming to be the oldest?
According to Fox News (somewhat reputable source), the White Horse Tavern and Restaurant is 153 years older!!!  This article is false and shameful to Wikipedia.
http://www.foxnews.com/leisure/2012/05/22/america-oldest-restaurants/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.106.166.131 (talk) 00:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

text: The claim is that it is the oldest continuously-operating restaurant. The White Horse Tavern is older, but has not always been a restaurant. Teemu08 (talk) 20:36, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it really the oldest? 

message: Is there any historical evidence of Rose Carey as America's first waitress?  I am not from the area, however searching for her name has not yielded any results except those for the Union Oyster House.  Also, there is no citation in the article.  If anyone has a source not associated with the Oyster House, it would give credibility to the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.93.195.95 (talk) 10:30, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  America's First Waitress
Talk:Leoben Conoy

message: I'm changing as much of this as possible to reflect his actual name Leoben Conroy not Conoy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.31.244.93 (talk • contribs) 
:Your wrong! Every reference to this character spells his name CONOY not CONROY! Cyberia23 06:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Conoy -> Conroy

message: I have not seen this model in some time, is there a reason for that? Tinman8443 06:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Episodes

message: "This makes Adama suspicious as it is a reaction that Cylons have to radiation (in this case emitted by the gas giant the anchorage orbits)."
How would this fact make Adama suspicious? He has no reason to believe or even suspect that "skinjob" Cylons exist at this point. Also, how would he know that radiation makes Cylons sick? He only finds out that Leoben is a Cylon after Leoben tells him as much. Adama is naturally suspicious of Leoben, but after everything he's been through, who wouldn't be?
--70.77.37.70 19:38, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ragnar, Adama, and Leoben 

message: In the section of this article on "Leoben's role in Starbuck's destiny," it mentions that Kara has hallucinations of non-existent Cylon raiders and that she hallucinates a dogfight with it.  Is this accurate?  While her ship showed no damage after the first encounter, the bullet from the second encounter seems to be what knocked her unconscious (and into the avatar Leoben's guidance).  More importantly, in the second encounter you see the heavy raider for the first time out of Kara's perspective, when the camera is following Apollo's wing as he tries to convince Kara to pull out of the maelstrom.  Has there been any official comment on this, or is the hallucinatory description merely speculative? --68.114.223.108 (talk) 13:09, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kara's Hallucinated Raider 

message: Someone should change the title of this article to reflect Leoben's model number. As far as I can tell that is the standard for the other models' articles. Besides, we don't really know whether they all used the same name or if we only saw one (or a few) of them in the series. --KatjaKat (talk) 22:14, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article header
Talk:Tom Rolfe

message: was one of the best American sons of the great racehorse and sire Ribot. - Sounds like violation of NPOV. --94.113.49.32 (talk) 11:37, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: absolutely correct. "Great" isn't quite as bad as "legendary" but it's not encyclopedic. I have replaced it with something factual. Horses like Ribot, Secretariat etc don't need peacock terms, the facts speak for themselves. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 14:43, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Ribot (horse)

message: I have changed the entry for Ribot. Apart from stylistic improvements such as the unbracketed dates (what is "Tenerani 1944" supposed to mean?), I have corrected the incorrect name given for Mario Incisa della Rochetta (incorrectly quoted as "Rocchetta" from a quoted web site - he actually wrote a book, "The Tesios as I knew Them", which gives his correct name. I have included this in the references). I have also updated Ribot's stud career in part from the book, "Great Racehorses of the World", which I have included in the references. 
His name really is Mario Incisa della Rocchetta, check the family's website https://www.tenutasanguido.com/en/history.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C8:2F87:CE01:9597:3372:4EC4:2ED3 (talk) 21:22, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ribot 

message: Why do you regard Ribot as Briton, since it was Italian during all its glorious racing career? Lele giannoni (talk) 14:33, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: That highlights one of the difficulties of trying to assign "nationality" to a racehorse. Ribot was foaled at the National Stud in Newmarket, hence he is regarded as British in breeding terms - but undoubtedly he was bred by an Italian and trained by an Italian.--Bcp67 (talk) 19:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country 

message: Tagged article with refimprove. Loads of unreferenced material. All good faith stuff, but needs evidence. For instance, NONE of the Horse of the Year awards are referenced. Note that Pedigree Query is not usually considered a reliable source.  Tigerboy1966  08:35, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: replaced tag. No improvements had been made.  Tigerboy1966  20:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I am trying to knock this article into shape. There's a lot of repetition/redundancy and nothing like enough refs, but I'm doing my best. The old boy deserves it.  Tigerboy1966  21:04, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Updates

message: Coming to this page in passing and noticing the flag "weasel words" on a comment about the horse, which is fair enough as no citation, however I will leave a quote from Breeding for Racing (1976) by John Hislop (who bred Brigadier Gerard) who lists Ribot as one of the outstanding race sires of his time, and calls him "one of the greatest racehorses of the century". While being only one citation, is does show that Ribot was held in esteem by people in the trade. (This is also backed up by information about his career.) (The horse, not Mr Hislop.) I also edited "greatest horses" to "greatest racehorses", since Ribot is not famous for any other purpose than racing. 212.159.59.41 (talk) 09:54, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Weasel Words
Talk:Canonero II

message: I am related to the owner of Cañonero II, and would be willing to contribute the page if possible.It really is quite a story, often over looked and under appreciated. This isn't to say that there aren't other horse stories just saying that it might be a good opportunity to improve the article. Thanks, CraigP 03:24, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dragon Ball GT: Transformation

message: All right, what exactly needs cleaning up in this article? It's kind of hard to do the work if nobody leaves any tools behind to perform it. The S 03:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup?

message: Can anyone actually confirm the existance of this multiplayer mode?  I have never played this game Multiplayer but I have achieved pretty much everything in this game and I have never heard any reference to this mode anywhere else.  I think that part should be deleted until someone can actually confirm that it exists. 24.108.193.197 07:58, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Piccolo Mode is for single-cart use. If you have one cartridge but two Game Boy Advances, you can play Piccolo mode with a link cable. If need be, I can find evidence online (an inital search only found a message board discussion regarding a dead EB Games link), but if you really need solid evidence I'll videotape myself playing it on my own GBA The S 15:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah, its alright.  I just wanted to know if this actually existed or not.  If you say that it is there then that is the only proof that I need.  The only reason why I doubted it was because it isn't in the manual, and I believe that you don't need to unlock it either. 24.108.193.197 10:28, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Piccolo Mode?
Talk:Sumomomo, Momomo

message: The Japanese Wiki has 2 parts, but most of them include characters which are Manga based. So, has anyone read the manga, and can help us with this? Snowstormz 15:43, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split character list into two parts? 

message: I think I've seen the spelling "Sumomomo Momomo" used in the anime, which has higher Google hit count. —Tokek 08:28, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, there is the fact that in the logo, only the first Su and the fourth Mo are bolded, signifying the division between the words.--十八 11:38, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

text: Oops, it wasn't the anime where I saw the spelling, but the manga (as seen on the front cover):  —Tokek 12:35, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Good enough for Wikipedia. If an official spelling is provided, that's the one we use; I'm changing it now.--十八 13:09, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: On a related topic, does the title mean something like "Plum and peach"?  I know "sumomo" is "plum" and "momo" is "peach", with the other two "mo"s meaning, I think, "also"; this would mean that the title should be written "Sumomo mo Momo mo", unless you prefer to run grammatical particles into the words they mark!  I know it's a tongue twister, but one imagines the Japanese would use an actual (though nonsensical) phrase, like we do with "red lorry yellow lorry", rather than complete gibberish ;-) Dave-ros 19:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It stems from a Japanese tongue twister: Sumomo mo momo, momo mo momo, sumomo mo momo mo momo no uchi. It means, "Plums are peaches and peaches are peaches and plums and peaches are both types of peaches." More or less, anyway. It's also frequently written as one long phrase to increase the confusion, which is possibly why the title is capitalized as such.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.244.41 (talk) 05:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sumomomo Momomo vs. Sumomo mo Momo mo 

message: *Manga Life: manga vol. 4 
*Mania.com: manga vol. 4 manga vol. 6 manga vol. 7
*CBB: vol. 7
--KrebMarkt (talk) 20:10, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review(s)
Talk:Riva Ridge

message: The horse is named after the German position in Italy, taken by the 10th Mountain Division in WWII. There's 5-figure coverage of that action on the Web, NPR is publicizing some coverage of it today, and the horse article mentions it but the unit's article does not, at least by name. A lack that deserves correction.--Jerzy•t 19:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 10th-Mountain's assault 
Talk:Taft Museum of Art

message: Please note this museum is participating in the Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art (Wikipedia:Wikipedia Loves Art/Taft Museum of Art rules). All interested editors are invited to participate in this project.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk  18:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia Loves Art 
Talk:Ash Vale railway station

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:Little Red Lighthouse

message: shouldn't the title be Jeffrey Hook lighthouse (the official name)? Daveisland (talk) 02:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Per WP:NAME: "Use names and terms most commonly used, and so most likely to be recognized, for the topic of the article." --agr (talk) 17:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: I propose the use of this new image, covering both the lighthouse and the bridge, but I leave that to the criterion of the native editors. A very nice picture.--JotaCartas (talk) 22:08, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New Image

message: I am not sure of the importance of the proposal and the level of detail present in the story of the proposal. I personally don't think it has a great relevance to the lighthouse, but if it is to remain it requires rewriting in the correct tone of Wikipedia.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robrobrob2 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relevance of the proposal 

message: why did you revert my change to the infobox? I spent quite a long time making sure that all the data was preserved. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: File:Little Red Lighthouse, Fort Washington Park.jpg is pretty inarguably a better image.Filetime (talk) 16:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, yes I agree! Was that the only issue? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Feel free to put the other content back. Filetime (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Assyrian Democratic Movement

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:Assyrian folk dance

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:Sycamore Shoals

message: The Tennessee Encyclopedia says Old Abram led the 1776 attack, not Dragging Canoe  --AW 18:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Abram or Dragging Canoe? 

message: I started a draft a few weeks ago on this, because I thought it was an interesting pre-history to the pre-Tennessee, pre-Watauga Settlement; and one that doesn't have much wiki information available.  It was rejected for an article twice, on not having sufficient references.  I am not versed well enough in wiki-procedures and politics, to really know how to get this page added.  Perhaps it would be better to be included in an existing page related to Sycamore Shoals or the Watauga Association, however; it really in my mind, is a stand alone topic, that pre-dates the details of both of these pages; even though it shares location with them.  Can anyone better versed in Wiki take a look, and see if you have any ideas on how to get this info established in an article?  Draft:Watauga_Old_Fields?  The level of detail it contains, is not found anywhere in wiki, and there are several other wiki pages related to Indian Old Fields and other specific Old Fields (Eskippathiki) that likely do not have as much history as the Watuaga Old Fields.  Thanks to anyone who might assist. Davidwtaylor1 (talk) 13:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Watauga Old Fields

message: I propose merging Sycamore Shoals State Historic Area into Sycamore Shoals. The majority of the Historic Area article is just summarizing this one, and some of the remaining content, such as the list of annual events, should be further summarized per WP:NOTGUIDE. --Ahecht (TALKPAGE) 13:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Sun Studio

message: Where is the article for Sun Studio?
http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/
Here: Sun Studio (software). -DePiep (talk) 17:01, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SunStudio 

message: The adress is written at 706, but the oicture shows "710". Could this be clarified in the text? -DePiep (talk) 12:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  706 or 710? 
Talk:Atheris squamigera

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:Rock Sand

message: Can't find a ref for his skeleton being in Paris: only WP mirrors.  Tigerboy1966  13:14, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Skeleton

message: (cur | prev) 14:04, 8 August 2006‎ Galopin (talk | contribs)‎ . . (23 bytes) (+23)‎ . . (moved Rock Sand (horse) to Rock Sand) (thank)
:I suppose it's certain that there's no place called Rock Sand? In ictu oculi (talk) 00:24, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: removed (horse)
Talk:Aunque me Cueste la Vida

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed or you would like to help spread this message contact us on this page. Thanks, ---J.S (t|c) 03:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 