Talk:Namma Metro

message: From the photo, is that the official name for the Metro? Grusl 09:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Namma Metro?

message: Namma Metro is a colloquial term and a brand name. But it is not a common name by which the Metro is referred to. To an outsider it will be confusing to list Bangalore Metro as "Namma Metro" in Wikipedia. I understand the Parochial and chauvinistic concerns, but it is better to categorize this as "Bangalore Metro"
Xwas (talk) 07:11, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Namma Metro is a registered legal name. No parochial or chavuinism here.. It is as parochial as calling Deutsche Bahn as "German Train."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.113.47.66 (talk) 05:09, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Bangalore Metro should be the main page 

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 18:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject class rating

message: They want to open the Bangalore metro only when the PM is available ? till then the millions Rs spent on building it lies unused. that is a mad waste. open the metro and have your ceremony anytime - you will get your pic in the paper anyway and we will get to use something built with our money for us.
Also expenses like the mock metro are better not spent. with that Rs 4,00,000 we could have helped poor farmers, given loans. who needs to see how to board a train? show a video on tv ... if we can get on a mall elevator we can figure out a train with automatic doors!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tgkprog (talk • contribs) 01:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Open when ready not when VVIP ready 

message: No one hurt but Friday 7th Oct 2011, one of the trains derailed. Apparently due to over speeding in a section where the curve of the track is not optimal but could not be helped due to Industry proximity in the Bypanhalli area  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.93.144.182 (talk) 22:28, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NEWS - train derails during trials 

message: It is mentioned "Each corridor consists of two tunnels which are the first underground tunnels built for trains in South India".  Wrong.  The tunnels for Konkan railway predates these by more than a decade. Incidentally the length of its tunnels is more than that of any of the metros including Kolkata metro which was mostly underground in its first phase.  There are older tunnels in Indian Railways too, eg.  Mangalore Hassan, Nilgiri mountain railway, etc..
The right claim would be that these are the first tunnels for a suburban railway in South India 
--K N Unni (talk) 06:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong claim? 

message: Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted.
Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia.
This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link.
If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting.
If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page.
If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta.
When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags.
The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true.
Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
*http://www.railway-technology.com/projects/bangalore_metro/
*:Triggered by \brailway-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 22:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Diannaa (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Namma Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120110201400/http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com:80/city/bangalore/Metro-project-Cabinet-approves-two-new-lines-for-Phase-2/articleshow/11356895.cms to http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bangalore/Metro-project-Cabinet-approves-two-new-lines-for-Phase-2/articleshow/11356895.cms
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:44, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Namma Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070625192128/http://economictimes.indiatimes.com:80/articleshow/1508263.cms to http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1508263.cms
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928042112/http://www.bmrc.co.in/pdf/award.pdf to http://www.bmrc.co.in/pdf/award.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Namma Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110927101234/http://www.alstom.com/home/news/news/business_news/60752.EN.php?languageId=EN&dir=/home/news/news/business_news/ to http://www.alstom.com/home/news/news/business_news/60752.EN.php?languageId=EN&dir=/home/news/news/business_news/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:54, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The claim that average daily ridership is 175000 seems to be wrong. The reference cited for average daily ridership gives 110,000 for the purple line. Editing the claim. If there is an updated reference with an updated number, please feel free to change.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.99.187.221 (talk) 14:07, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong claim on daily ridership 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Namma Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110511135410/http://pmindia.nic.in/speech/content.asp?id=343 to http://pmindia.nic.in/speech/content.asp?id=343
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130106033920/http://www.deccanchronicle.com/121218/news-current-affairs/article/metro-rushes-meet-deadline to http://www.deccanchronicle.com/121218/news-current-affairs/article/metro-rushes-meet-deadline
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:52, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The article doesn't explain why the system is called "Namma" as opposed to "Bangalore Metro". best, Sunil060902 (talk) 22:51, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: @Sunil060902: I don't think the origin is of importance as there is any significant reason out there. But there is a source right at the first line which proves that this system is called Namma Metro. — LeoFrank  Talk 17:07, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the name "Namma"? 

message: As per the namma metro official site, there is parking facility available at Trinity station on Green line. It looks the map is old. Hemadri Ramaraju (talk) 02:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parking not shown at Trinity station 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Namma Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111025130435/http://bmrc.co.in/Main/ProjectHighlights.htm to http://bmrc.co.in/Main/ProjectHighlights.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150814185117/http://www.bmrc.co.in/English/schematic_map.html to http://bmrc.co.in/English/schematic_map.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150814222834/http://www.bmrc.co.in/English/Network.htm to http://www.bmrc.co.in/English/Network.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150412044231/http://bmrc.co.in/pdf/phase2/phase2forweb.pdf to http://bmrc.co.in/pdf/phase2/phase2forweb.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130624234858/http://www.bmrc.co.in/pdf/news/Revserrpt.pdf to http://www.bmrc.co.in/pdf/news/Revserrpt.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150412044231/http://bmrc.co.in/pdf/phase2/phase2forweb.pdf to http://bmrc.co.in/pdf/phase2/phase2forweb.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: Under 1.1.1 - Underground construction 
"The UG2 (north to south corridor), from Majestic to K.R Market is expected to finish the entire tunnelling works by August 2016, after which the Green Line would be opened for service, towards the end of the year."
Construction has been completed , so should change but I don't more information on it
Reo (talk) 07:05, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: @Rejenish: Please go ahead and boldly make the change. — LeoFrank  Talk 09:49, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Construction completed  

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:38, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: 1) The description at the beginning needs a few changes - no history section.
2) A lot of background information contains details that are jumbled - this can be streamlined.
Can we modify the contents, so information is presented better? Cpt Naveen (talk) 13:57, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we modify & update? 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:24, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion 

message: This Image, which seems to be from one of the Underground stations, is wrongfully labelled as Baiyapannahalli Station. While I am not sure as to which one it is (Vidhana Soudha Station, I guess), its definitely not Baiyappanahalli, which is at ground level SunnyandBunny 21 (talk) 17:56, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  An image is wrongfully marked as Baiyappanahalli Station 

message: The Bengaluru Monorail page seems like it should be merged with this page, unless I'm mistaken. It seems like the Monorail was just a proposed project that never came to fruition, so it could potentially just be a note on this page rather than its own separate article.
LiterallyDavidBowie (talk) 02:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal for Bengaluru Monorail