lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Banking in Russia

message: Every sentence should be rewritten to sound as if an American (or Englishman etc.) had written it - for instance, the first sentence "Banking in Russia has significant specifics" means something like "There are significant specific details affecting banking in Russia". 
 --Parker007 17:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Deal passport or Contract passport is a brief info, a summary or header information of the contract Kmorozov 09:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rough Translation template

message: Thank you. As I explained, I will want to rewrite the article in general when I have a better idea what it means, after which you should make sure I haven't misrepresented its meaning. Continuing:
"The margin settled as a result of clearing..." Does this mean the margin between the official exchange rate and the market exchange rate, reported as a profit to the Bank?
 --Parker007 02:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Deal passport or Contract passport is a brief info, a summary or header information of the contract Kmorozov 09:09, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Continued

message: The part about the Soviet banking system is very strange, loaded with value and limited in scope. I think it should just be removed, unless someone wants to re-write it. --Vesteinn (talk) 01:26, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've deleted the section.  Miles Mathis is a bizarre conspiracy theorist, and shouldn't be considered a reliable resource. 110.93.94.220 (talk) 06:55, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Deleted the section again after writing a better edit history. 110.93.94.220 (talk) 07:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange, value-loaded text on the USSR
Talk:Captain Video: Master of the Stratosphere

message: i marked this quote as dubious, as The Lost Planet has the exact same review, word-for-word, from the same source. i don't want to comment on the authors (lack of) originality, but this seems dubious.--91.64.59.134 (talk) 17:49, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious
Talk:Cobray Company

message: "The Cobray Company was a manufacturer of sub-machine guns and semi-automatic handguns. These were manufactured by SWD (Sylvia Williams Daniel)."
Is the company's name Cobray or SWD?  What is the relation of the Cobray Company and SWD?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Darktangent (talk • contribs) 20:19, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification Required 

message: I've seen a few references to a very crude, single-shot shotgun produced by Cobray called the 'Terminator.'  It appears it was chambered in both 20 and 12-gauge.  If anyone has additional information from reliable sources about this design, it may be good to add.  Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 01:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 1500 Terminators were made, according to the Forgotten Weapons episode. See youtube.  Skiendog (talk) 17:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terminator Shotgun? 

message: After reading the article in the current state I am very confused: Article mentioned Daniel (Leinad backwards), and divorce of Sylvia and Wayne.  So who are these people and who are they connected to the company?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.119.240.84 (talk) 04:09, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who are these people? 

message: The 5th item for "Leinad models" reads:
"6 shot (manual rotation) 22LR derringer"
Isn't a model name missing here?
--Mortense (talk) 15:41, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing model name? 

message: The article includes a sub-heading titled "Legal Trouble" but does not describe any events or circumstances. Also, the subsequent section indicates that the company was sold and/or the name was changed because of legal issues, but once again there is no description of said issues.
209.166.137.226 (talk) 16:46, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Legal Trouble" ?
Talk:Cobra Beer

message: I have re-written most of the page, adding further details, categories, and relevant images in order to bring the page up-to-date as of November 2014. Although this has been done for work-related reasons (I am Lord Bilimoria's Researcher) - I have done my best to retain impartiality, especially with regard to the take-over by Molson Coors. I will happily add more details as they become available.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jack Tindale (talk • contribs) 15:51, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite

message: The article reads like a press release. Karan Bilimoria launched Cobra to exploit the Indian restaurant beer market in the UK, which at that time was dominated by Carlsberg. The smoother, less gassy lager line is just marketing bullshit - Cobra tastes very like every other UK mass market 5% lager. --Ef80 (talk) 12:56, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Cobalt Networks

message: The cobalt product line was killed by Sun in Cobalts glory days because they competed and won against a Sun product.  Sun wanted to acquire Cobalt for the customer base and try to migrate the customers to the Sun products.  I personally do not think this was worth 2 billion dollars but sun did, and the was a well know fact inside of Cobalt, (at least the contacts we delt with over the phone) Unfort.  There is no record of this that I can find, it was only from friends of mine that worked for Cobalt who called to tell me what was happening to thier company.
If you have addtional info, please drop me a note.
--Akc9000 03:43, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  untitled
Talk:Coast Hotels

message: The article has been extensively scrubbed of negative content, with promotional content added, by an IP address 208.98.203.50 that leads back to Coast Hotels. I'm not familiar with the reporting process for this kind of misconduct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rob Cottingham (talk • contribs) 19:25, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing by the company? 

message: * "Apa under fire again, this time for anti-Semitic remarks" Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 03:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antisemitism in magazines distributed to Coast Hotels guests
Talk:Same-sex marriage in Colombia

message: Colombia: One Bogota notary office, a hundred same-sex partnership registrations 
Colombia: Senate rejects same-sex partnership bill AGAIN; gay-friendly Notary Public shot to death in Bogota (October 11, 2008)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.12.171.218 (talk) 19:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Apparently, the Colombian senate is going to vote on SSM on April 23rd: Colombia's Senate postpones gay marriage vote. Ben Gershon - בן גרשון (Talk) 16:20, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Senate to vote next week? 

message: Apparently, a civil court judge has ordered the recognition of a marriage between two women in Gachetá. The wedding was held secretly on September 25, but the couple has since come forward and announced their union publicly.
Article in Spanish from El Espectador newspaper: 
Blog post in English that, though not authoritative, provides useful background and context to events in Colombia leading up to this ceremony:  Fortguy (talk) 16:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gachetá marriage 

message: A Bogotá court has annulled a marriage ruling that there is no constitutional basis for same-sex marriage. Link:  Fortguy (talk) 16:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marriage annulled
Talk:Same-sex marriage in Costa Rica

message: In the current Legislative Assembly, eight of the ten PAC deputies and José María Villalta, the sole Broad Front deputy, support same-sex marriage.
Is this still the current Legislative Assembly? --LaserLegs (talk) 11:11, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes is the same LA, however after the court ruling most deputies just went along and left the issue at the hands of the Court, not wanting to legislate on it nor in favor nor against, and refuse to vote a motion that would request the Court to extend the term. --Dereck Camacho (talk) 02:21, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  current Legislative Assembly
Talk:CNN Newsource

message: Nomick Electronic Technology Co., Ltd, a modern and comprehensive enterprise, was established in August 2010, which specializes in manufacturing, researching & developing and exporting headphones,wireless headphones and peripheral accessories. Our company is headquartered in Shenzhen City, Guang Dong Province.
 
Nomick is in stable development under the customers’ supports and love. Our business principles are: Quality first, Customer supreme. We provide customers with comprehensive, high- quality products and efficient services. Our products include all kinds of metal, wood and plastic headsets and headphones such as Mp3/Mp4 headphones, Mobile phone hands-free headsets, Computer headphones, and Gaming headphones, etc. The essence of our products is high quality, elegancy, fashion, environmental protection.
 
Nomick's products are widely exported to South America and Southeast Asia and other places. There is a huge market for our products. We are sincerely eager to establish a good, long-term and stable relationship with domestic and foreign customers.
 
Nomick has a group of trained employees, who can be faster, more effective, more passionate to fully meet the customers ' needs through completely technical supports and services. Based on high quality products and first-class services, we have got recognition and favor from business partners at home and abroad.
 
To better expand and enhance our customer base, Nomick is looking forward to your inquiry from mail and phone calls. We’d like to spare no efforts to offer you fast, professional and first-class services.
~ ~ ~ ~　　  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bingoyao (talk • contribs) 02:42, 8 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomick
Talk:Mastercam

message: This entry appears to be highly promotional, as if it was written by Mastercam's marketing, I know there is a way to flag but I'm not sure how. Lg king (talk) 20:21, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

message: I've been TOLD that the next version of MC should be out within the next month or two (September-ish, 2009).  If anybody can verify this supposed release date, would they please post it?
LP-mn (talk) 17:58, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  next version 

message: This article could seriously be improved upon. Where is the table for stable release and release history? These kind of information should be by Wiki standards asap.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.141.142.3 (talk) 20:42, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: The article could receive an part with why several users are moving away from mastercam, see whymastercamisthewrongchoice.blogspot.com  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.166.254.118 (talk) 15:04, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion about mastercam 

message: Almost all of the sources are from the company website, the page just seems like an add. 2600:8800:1B02:AB00:295A:9803:9041:FCBB (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seems like an add
Talk:CMS (law firm)

message: I have updated the CMS Cameron McKenna page to make it inline with the wiki pages of other law firms.
If there are any issues with the page or any updates then please contact me.
Many thanks,
Alex  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexHarrisCMS (talk • contribs) 12:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Update 

message: I've added proper disclosure for involved users. (I'm sorry that this is done afterwards.) In order to support cleanup, I'd suggest to change the header template from  to  if that's acceptable for the community. --- JD at CMS (talk) 07:09, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you're taking action and the usernames seem obvious (and since editors were no longer around when they were told about the required disclosure), I don't think it was purposefully undisclosed paid editing. So, I also think it's fine to replace it with just a "COI" tag. If anyone disagrees, feel free to add it back (I'm not an expert here). Also, thanks  for complying with the UPE policy. Best, - Whisperjanes (talk) 02:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI
Talk:CMG (company)

message: Nothing about the takeover / merger of / with Admiral ?
81.133.94.91 (talk) 15:13, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Admiral 
Talk:Club Libby Lu

message: This article seems to be very biased (towards the negative). GtstrickyTalk or C 20:14, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias

message: Snake skksmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmsmmsmmsmmmdmdmmyvlgjlvsvuudqdsddwdwrfwfqrqqvufguvcvvvvvvgggggvxigpipgdluyuglflchcgcgcuvlvlvumfmrcmccwwcvlluvopdrqfyprmvagufj jdcvlurllvlvpqrf ogfocdqdqdqdl 2601:807:8001:70:E8EA:ACB6:6996:733 (talk) 21:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Club libby lu
Talk:Cliff Brewery

message: I worked there in the seventies. It had four different segregated staff canteens - one for the manual workers, another for the office clerks, another for the managers, and finally a dining room for the directors. The beer had an excessively bitter and unpleasant taste to it - too many hops I think - so I'm not surprised it went bankrupt a few years later, and was restarted with different owners. 80.0.102.191 (talk) 22:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  In the 70s 
Talk:Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton

message: As far as I know, CGSH does not have an office in Buenos Aires. It is not listed on its website. If anyone has information to the contrary, please provide a citation. Thanks, --Mediterraneo (talk) 16:30, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Office in Buenos Aires

message: I'm not sure that the white shoe belongs in the article, let alone the opening paragraph, since it's not a phrase that is in common usage, and has some controversy attached.Lindenfall (talk) 00:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  White shoe firm 

message: The Buchheit section relies too heavily on quotes, so needs a rewrite. Lindenfall (talk) 20:59, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buchheit section
Talk:Clearwater Features

message: The notability of this company is currently unclear, since no secondary sources are cited. By the notability criteria for companies, independent reliable sources are required to make sure that the subject is notable. These sources might be press coverage about the firm, or books in which the firm is mentioned. Please add such sources to the article. 
For the time being, I am resetting the date counter of the “notability” warning tag. Sorted as part of the Notability wikiproject. --B. Wolterding 19:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability
Talk:Clas Ohlson

message: The Reading Store has now closed ending Clas Olsen's presence in the UK https://www.readingchronicle.co.uk/news/20711979.clas-ohlson-reading-store-finally-closes/ Longfinal (talk) Longfinal (talk) 00:21, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closure of Reading Store
Talk:Clarks Village

message: The history and operation of Clarks Village is a current school project for year 10; I think there might be quite a few revisions here over the next term, sorry.
The article describes the centre as 'purpose built' yet describes itself (and it is) a redevelopment of existing shoe factory buildings - in my humble opinion that doesn't make it 'purpose built' - this, coupled with its challenged claim to be the 'first', makes me wonder if the whole paragraph needs to simply read "It opened in 1993"
Artemka (talk) 18:29, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the contentious claim about "1st purpose built". If anyone has a definitive statement, supported by reliable sources please put it back.— Rod talk 19:12, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purpose built 
Talk:Clairol

message: There should be a mention of the discontinued "Lemon up" shampoo from the 1970s in this article.   — C M B J   22:48, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why did you stop makeing Vitapoint?? 86.185.0.162 (talk) 09:43, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Lemon up

message: Have there been any updates to Corporate History since 2007?   Tiyang (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corporate History 

message: The page is really weighted towards the advertisements and I think it would be nice to add some more content. It is, after all, supposed to be about the company. Coralshin (talk) 20:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising
Talk:Nullity of Marriage Act 1971

message: "there was fear expressed that someone could purport to be a member of the opposite sex in order to trap someone in a marriage."  Sorry but I don't know what this sentence means.  Does it mean that a man might pretend to be a woman in order to trick another man into marrying him, and that same-sex marriage was outlawed to prevent that? -86.133.247.156 21:13, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically yes. the fact that the debate in the House of Commons was at that level is barely believeable, but true. Catwhoorg 18:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well can we have a reference then? The encyclopaedia shouldn't have to rely on a user just stating something is true. The piece of legislation and the debate surrounding it, as described in the present version of the article, seem quite bizarre, and while it does seem just about plausible that this was the level of the debate, everything should be well-sourced. Rovaniemi-5 (talk) 14:19, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

text: Oddly, I can't find this act in the Statute Law Database or on the Office of Public Sector Information site. Is this because it's since been repealed? Someone had better add some sources to prove this law ever even existed! Rovaniemi-5 (talk) 14:24, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This Act did exist: here is a link which shows it being repealed by the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 as claimed in the text. On the other hand, this page needs updating now that Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 has been passed.  MrStoofer (talk) 16:29, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Citysearch

message: Question - how is this whole entire article not considered advertising/spam? What is news or notable about this? Toonot 22:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:CityLink Limited

message: I’ve had a look for sources and it seems that there is enough to show notability. Best source I could find was this one. Set up in 1995 by Wellington City Council, it would have generated quite a bit of interest, but newspapers from that time aren’t online. There was certainly sustained reporting when Christchurch City Council set up an equivalent company, Enable Networks, in 2007. Schwede66 20:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: * No worries. We have quite a few active editors in Wellington.  Can one of you help out? Maybe dig something out at the library? Schwede66 12:33, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

text: * Are the online links below of use? 
https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/3280989/CityLink-vows-to-put-fibre-underground
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/industries/3283074/Construction-company-partners-with-CityLink-in-fibre-proposal
http://www.stuff.co.nz/markets/3119280/TeamTalk-mops-up-the-rest-of-CityLink
https://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/2480290/CityLink-signs-former-Cabinet-minister
https://www.stuff.co.nz/technology/it-telcos/387806/Citylink-to-roll-fibre-to-Petone
Noracrentiss (talk) 19:40, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: * Thanks for these! They look like good sources at a glance. I'll see if I can work them into the article when I have time. Other editors can feel free to do so as well. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 19:46, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

text: There are articles in Telecommunications Review e.g.https://natlib-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1fro764/INNZ7113102550002837 unfortunately not online but I may be able to look them out sometime.--Gertrude206 (talk) 20:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:City Bank of Montreal

message: No references since 2009.  Either it merges with CIBC with a redirect, or it has to go. Rhadow (talk) 11:23, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Is there a reference it merged into CIBC? The Consolidated article says the bank was liquidated in 1882 and not part of CIBC. -- 67.70.33.184 (talk) 10:28, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with CIBC
Talk:Frontier Communications

message: The company has changed its name following the bankruptcy and relisting. Imagine Reason (talk) 11:43, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Nah. WP:COMMONNAME is still just Frontier Communications. That "Parent" is simply part of the corporate suffixes, which per WP:NCCORP we leave off from the title unless it's necessary for disambiguation purposes. oknazevad (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move article to [[Frontier Communications Parent]]? 

message: lot of old routine detail without sources in history, last few years missing. 98.153.77.186 (talk) 22:33, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  section update tag
Talk:Same-sex marriage in Austria

message: Karner vs. Austria (2003)
—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.12.171.218 (talk) 10:31, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Other articles like this seem to be entitlesd "Same-sex union..." rather than "Gay union...". Any complaints if I move it? DJ Clayworth (talk) 20:56, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: The last part of the last paragraph is not clear about how the OVP members opinions are now different. Touyats (talk) 22:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it is not worded in a clear way, but the last paragraph only talks about what SPÖ members said. The ÖVP members' opinions never really changed. The "difference" mentioned is that one SPÖ response was not in line with the other SPÖ responses. SPQRobin (talk) 14:38, 10 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Same sex marriage calls section, August 2016 updates 

message: It looks like on 18 January 2017 the parliament committee asked an opinion to someone. My german is not good enough to understand whom they asked to. Can someone fix my wording and the reference?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Touyats (talk • contribs) 20:56, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  January 2017 update 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: Moved — JFG talk 11:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Recognition of same-sex unions in Austria →  – Due to court ruling, this is a certainty. Move to keep title in line with other countries. Me-123567-Me (talk) 01:13, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

text: Support in line with WP:COMMONNAME. Jono52795 (talk) 06:20, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

text: Support. Isseubnida (talk) 16:06, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 December 2017