lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Comfort

message: This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kjf1118. 20:56, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

message: WP:VA could be WP:COMFORT or WP:comfort right?--Comfortcomfortiscomfort (talk) 09:25, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder if there's a bot that can write articles based on research?  —$ΡЯΙNGεrαgђ (-¢|ε|Ŀ|T|♪-) 03:25, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does this talk page bring comfort?--150.216.254.207 (talk) 08:40, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  comfort 

message: It was written: Like certain other terms describing positive feelings or abstractions (hope, charity, chastity), comfort may also be used as a personal name.
.Bod (talk) 19:44, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Name Comfort
Talk:Sakastan (Sasanian province)

message: This source says one of the Sassanian defense lines was in Sistan, but I couldn't find further information. Another source mentions a defense line "west of what is yoday Afganistan", I don't know if the two refer to the same thing. --Z 15:47, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A defense line in Sistan
Talk:ROH Pure Championship

message: Is it definite that the pure title is now a thing of the past? Are we sure that Danielson isn't going to just hold both and defend them separately? Tromboneguy0186 21:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If 2 titles are defended separately then I don't really think they should be considered unified. TJ Spyke 02:41, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, as per Wikipedia's own article on the topic, "unification" can still refer to this scenario, like when Kurt Angle, Jeff Jarrett, and D-Lo Brown unified the Intercontinental and European titles in the WWF. Tromboneguy0186 08:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

text: In both of the definitions for wrestling, the titles are merged into one title. With the 3 wrestlers you listed the IC/Euro titles were not unified into 1 title, they were still seperate titles and thus not unified. TJ Spyke 21:12, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's moot anyway, ROH has now come out and said there's only one singles title Tromboneguy0186 21:18, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

text: That's fine, they are just an indy fed and don't need more than 1 singles title. When/if they decide to try and become a major organization(which they will need a TV deal for) then I can see the need for more than 1 singles belt. TJ Spyke 21:22, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unification 

message: There Should be an annotation that AJ Style's Regin as Pure Champion is not officially recognized by Ring of Honor as it is not listed on their website's title history  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.139.78.62 (talk) 07:39, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title History
Category talk:Furry webcomics

message: I have a couple of quibbles here.
*El Goonish Shive has some furry characters but isn't primarily a furry comic;
*Wally and Osborne is about talking non-anthropomorphic animals.
Lee M 19:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Debatable, as Tracy doesn't consider herself a furry and has said the main reason she uses cats rather than humans is because she considers cats to be more expressive.
Also, what constitutes a "furry theme"? DonIago (talk) 04:08, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lackadaisy
Talk:Botev Peak

message: :"Easiest route: a two and a half climb from Ray Resthouse (1,560 m) at the south foot"
Two and a half what? Days? Hours? Kilometres? - MPF 09:06, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed, my mistake :) Todor→Bozhinov 19:38, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Благодаря! - MPF 20:25, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox
Talk:Shulman (band)

message: ==Merger with Shulman (Band)==
While Shulman and his group are two separate entities, what Yaniv Shulman does outside of the band seems to be irrelevant, and thus not noteworthy. -Jwhites 00:01, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposals

message: While Shulman and his group are two separate entities, what Yaniv Shulman does outside of the band seems to be irrelevant, and thus not noteworthy. -Jwhites 00:01, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with [[Shulman (Band)]]

message: found this article useful, despite brevity. dont think it should be deleted due to notability issues.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.230.243.30 (talk) 19:30, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: notability
Talk:Venrock

message: I arrived on this page thinking it was *this* Dapper Labs https://www.dapperlabs.com/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AMDG09 (talk • contribs) 12:56, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: new page/disambiguation for Dapper Labs

message: ", gaining the distinction of funding five of the top twenty-five most influential products of the last 25 years."
without a source, that is just advertising speak. Removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.171.243 (talk) 04:29, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: need source

message: There can really be seen no advertisement on this page. What is advert like? That the company exists? That it finances tech companies? The article also doesn't belong to the Rockefeller family page because it is a company on its own. Article should be expanded. 
I deleted the advert tag and set the appropriate stub tag. --Peter Eisenburger 18:18, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: No advert, is stub

message: I deleted this sentence: "(above taken from Rockefeller Archive Center)". Please give and include the exact source. No comments like this in the article itself.--Peter Eisenburger 17:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Exact source please

message: For the reversion edit, put in the edit summary that you have reverted vandalism, but do not perpetuate the vandalism by putting the text you have reverted from IP 216.220.216.xxx. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.22.56.130 (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page Vandalism 
Talk:German submarine U-110 (1940)

message: I would like to suggest:
# We split this article into separate articles covering the two separate boats.
# Operation Primrose be merged into the second of the subsequent articles. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 16:34, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Support. There's no reason to treat the first and second U-110 boats together as (I presume) they are otherwise unrelated. I would suggest we use primary disambiguation in this case, given that the WWII U-110 is much more notable; that is, I propose the WWII boat stays here (Unterseeboot 110),  we move the WWI info to an article titled something like Unterseeboot 110 (World War I), and we add a disambiguation header to the top of this article. — Matt Crypto 16:42, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Convention would suggest Unterseeboot 110 (1917) for the elder vessel. We could rename this one to Unterseeboot 110 (1940) and have a disambiguation page as is common for USN and RN ship disambiguation pages. —Joseph/N328KF (Talk) 19:39, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sure. I still think "primary topic" disambiguation would be a better fit here, because the 1940 U-110 seems to be much more famous as a result of the Enimga capture. See, e.g. Google search: someone typing U-110 into the Wikipedia search bar is almost certainly looking for the WWII boat. But it doesn't matter a great deal, and I certainly wouldn't start a fight over it ;-) — Matt Crypto 20:51, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split/merger 

message: Among many others, I've changed USS Hunt to HMS Broadway (as per 'uboat.net' and many other accounts of the incident). The US was not in the War at this time, officially or otherwise, so there would hardly likely be an American warship involved; besides, Broadway pops up later in the article (without introduction or explanation).
I've also changed Baker-Cresswell's rank (the escort commander in Bulldog), from 'captain' (Army equivalent: Colonel)! to 'commander'. This was the grade he held at the time. ...Unless the 'captain' was meant to be an appointment and not a rank. But isn't the appointment then 'commanding officer', not 'captain'?
There are other changes - but they are too many to mention here.
RASAM (talk) 15:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes
Talk:Two Moors Way

message: Perhaps I don't understand the use of stubs, but it seems that by adding both the Devon stub and the UK stub, more people will be inclined to review the article—which seems like a good thing.  Is there some etiquette or style reason why a page can't have both? Ryan McDaniel 16:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stubs
Talk:Sleeve

message: There are also record sleeves, which do not have a page as of yet (that I found anyway). --Shrike 16:51, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I have moved the non-clothing senses to Sleeve (disambiguation). - PKM 21:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation

message: Good job adding this.  I tweaked it a bit to match the style of the other entries.  This sleeve was also fashionable in the 1950s.  I also removed the mention of fashionable for "gen Y and gen Z girls" as the fashion is seen in styles for women of all ages. - PKM 18:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 3/4 sleeves

message: Separate sets of sleeves should be addressed in this article. --Wetman 20:02, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate or attached to the garment

message: I think someone who knows more about sleeves than I do should merge that page into this.  Declan Clam (talk) 04:13, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Bell sleeve]] 

message: There's an article for "shirt-sleeve environment," but no article defining precisely what is meant by "shirt-sleeve."
Also, there is no definition here given as to what precisely is meant by "short sleeve," nor which of the sleeves listed might fall into the category of "short sleeve" assuming that it even is a category into which other sleeves might fall.
In the same light, no definition is given of "long sleeve," and this is problematic for the same reason.
For example, would the 3/4 sleeve officially be regarded by most fashion experts as a short-sleeve shirt or a long-sleeve shirt?  And, would a sleeve that hangs to the floor, as depicted in the picture, constitute a long-sleeve shirt, or does its length exceed that of a long-sleeve shirt and thus put it into some new category (assuming, again, that "long sleeve" and "short sleeve" even are categories broad enough to encompass various lengths)?
Don't answer here--merely integrate answers into the article, thereby improving it.
96.244.8.128 (talk) 15:31, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Long sleeves, short sleeves, and shirt-sleeves 

message: The description and photo for "poet sleeve" do not match, I think. 2A02:3035:C08:2560:1:0:2A23:D9C2 (talk) 14:18, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poet sleeve: wrong image
Talk:Thrust (video game)

message: Some time ago I wrote a Java applet to play a Thrust-style game, along with a level editor.  This is all available here, along with a generous helping of levels (admittedly of variable quality) contributed by users over the past five years.  My opinion as to whether it's worth linking to is obviously biased, so I'll leave that one in your hands.  If not, then I hope that my leaving a link on this talk page doesn't count as spam or excessive self-promotion.  --Will 152.78.191.84 16:57, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Java

message: Should this game's insane difficulty be of note? It seems to be caused by constant sticking of the controls.
:The controls didn't stick on the original version. YEMV (your emulation may vary). Cpc464 (talk) 07:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Difficulty

message: There was a sequel, Thrust 2 (or maybe Thrust II). It'd be nice to feature that on this article, or create a new one for it. Cpc464 (talk) 07:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sequel

message: Why does this page, and those for Exile and Starship Command, only have Electron screenshots? Shouldn't they (in addition, or replacement) show the more colourful/less limited Beeb version instead? David (talk) 18:56, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no Beeb screenshot? 

message: Lunar Lander is presumably the inspiration for this. 2fort5r (talk) 01:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Antecedents
Talk:Connecticut Route 20

message: Could someone please chech to see if the roads that I put in the table at the bottom have the correct city listed next to them? I did it by eye on google maps, so I don't think it is 100% correct. Thanks! --Jared  [T]/[C]\[P:O]/[@]\[+] 17:02, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In Barkhamsted, it additionally is called Main Street (0.12 miles) and East River Road (0.30 miles) but is probably not worth putting in.Polaron 20:50, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

text: In the Granby town center, 189 and 20 overlap for 0.26 mi west of 10/202. It is that portion that where 20 becomes North Granby Road. --Polaron | Talk 07:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roads 
Category talk:LGBT-related webcomics

message: "Category:LGBT webcomics" currently has "The Wotch" as a subcategory. I have doubts that "The Wotch" qualifies as a subcategory. What do others think? --EarthFurst 20:54, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Wotch subcategory ? 

message: http://www.riotnrrdcomics.com/ is definitely lgbt-related, and it has a decent following. 71.139.246.41 (talk) 05:39, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: new addition?
Talk:Patrick Farley

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 05:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: All those glorious existing weblinks, gone.  These were certainly the best comics online.  +sj + 11:36, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I can't believe nobody made a backup? Why aren't there mirrors all over the place? --dab (𒁳) 21:00, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  When his stuff was coming out online at the time it blew my mind. Recently I was feeling nostalgic and remembered these comics so I went to e-sheep.com saw it was all gone and then found it at http://web.archive.org/web/20030601135422/www.e-sheep.com/main.shtml Goodness what would we do without the internet archive? ;) Now, should the link be added to the article itself? Dogsgomoo (talk) 04:48, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, the best thing to do is to replace the 'works' links with refs (they currently link to the dead site), and have each ref link directly to the internet archive's pages. +sj + 07:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What a pity... 
Talk:Mardan

message: Hi, I just tagged the article and left the cleanup tag in place. It's clear that a lot of good work has gone into this article. I feel with a little cleanup (eg. several non-English parts, such as 'mardan zinda bad .faiz inqelabi mardan Kuwait' stand out that I simply can't make sense of) and by adding some context to the article, it would be possible to make it a lot more useful to people (like me) who are utterly unfamiliar with the area. As always, I'm happy to help in any way I can or answer any questions asked on my talk page. -- Seed 2.0 23:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context / cleanup 

message: How this article can be fully protected because some people are editing it for their own personnel interests and adding their or their organizations name for advertising.So it would be better to full protect it from editing.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.152.247.244 (talk) 19:32, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inquiry 

message: I've mercilessly edited this article to remove trivia, especially long lists of supposedly important people and personal opinions. If they warrant inclusion, do it carefully and using reliable sources. Wikipedia does not exist to showcase an area, it is an encyclopedia. Fences&Windows 13:50, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Special Operations Group (United States)

message: :I redirected this page to the SOCOM page, as the consensus of the delete nomination was in fact to redirect it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.224.90.93 (talk • contribs) 
::No, there was no consensus.  Redirecting is, however, a valid action to take with the article.  --W.marsh 20:26, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Harmodius and Aristogeiton

message: this article seems somewhat fixated on the homosexual relationship between these two people, the source cited on this page also gives evidence to support this, i feel this emphasis is wrong, yes it is mentioned that Harmodios has intimacy with men at a younger age, but that was something that was common in that day and age. The point of this story is the slaying of tyrants, not their personal love life.
When you become a registered Wikipedian and sign your edits, I will be happy to debate this question with you. Adam 03:08, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: In ironic contrast to the first comment in the above section, the relationship between the two of them is now so downplayed that you already have to know what certain Greek terms mean in order to detect it, and even then it's mentioned only in passing. It is NOT merely incidental: their relationship had everything to do with why they acted in concert and indeed why Arsitogeiton was moved to act at all, as the one clear (albeit in Greek) reference to their relationship suggests. Splendid victory here on the part of reactionaries who want to whitewash homosexuals from history. 192.31.106.34 (talk) 03:00, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Whitewashed
Talk:Simon Bar Sinister

message: The text doesn't say he was an evil scientist, but he was categorized as :Category:Fictional scientists and was clearly evil, so I changed the category.  --David.alex.lamb 17:36, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What's the basis for saying Cad's last name is Lackey? I don't recall it ever being uttered in an episode. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 136.152.146.103 (talk) 04:49, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled (2)

message: I believe Simon's last name is properly rendered as one word:  Barsinister. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vile Jelly (talk • contribs) 23:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled (3)

message: I always thought he looked a little like Klaus Kinski. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.55.61.139 (talk)  21:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simon bar Kinski 

message: Also, in Uncle Tom's Cabin, the villian Simon Legree can be combined with a line from a letter written by the character, George Harris, in the penultimate chapter where he describes slavery as "...that bar sinister which disgraces her (America) among nations...."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.41.11.90 (talk) 18:10, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The word sinister is also Latin for "the left side," which makes sense because Simon Bar Sinister is shown in the article as being left-handed. — Glenn L (talk) 03:18, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simon Bar Sinister 
Talk:Ella in Hamburg

message: The article says, "The record is currently only available as a Japanese import." Doesn't that depend where you are? If you happen to be reading this article in Japan, the record might be available in your local record store! Would it be better to say something like, "The record is currently only available in Japan, except as an import"? Or can anyone come up with some less clumsy wording? --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 17:37, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:USS Lake Champlain (CG-57)

message: We did not enter the Gulf in support of Desert Shield; we escorted the New Jersey as far as the Gulf of Oman.  Where she entered and steamed in the Persian Gulf for the afternoon and then we joined up with her after she steamed out.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.56.244.143 (talk) 23:41, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

message: any photos of the 1989-1991 period when she had lifelines on the bow instead of the hurricane bow might be useful.  also the if we can get clearance for the commissioning poster and/or the bumpersticker might be useful.  another useful photo would be a recent photo of the deckhouse, including the medals/decorations she's earned.  I'm sorry, but a nice photo of the AFEM and Gulf war medals might be useful to prove how stupid the defacer really was.  It really hurts finding out that what you thought was useful is completely forgotten in a matter of years :(
18:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  photos that might be useful
Talk:Paspy

message: I've never heard of a passepied referred to as a paspy. Where does this term come from (I haven't been able to find it in any dictioanry I own) and why does passepied redirect here, rather than the other way around? Is paspy just some strange, phonetic attempt at pronouncing the original French term? Guermantes 17:46, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved. Guermantes 00:36, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Title
Template talk:Cleanup-english

message: I'd like to change this phrase to focus on the content of the article, rather than speculating on the early language experiences of the author(s).  This is highly presumptous, misleading, and a little bit offensive to boot.  Some non-native English speakers speak and write better English than I do, and I write better Spanish than some native Spanish speakers I know.  Wouldn't we be better served to reference the grammar or phrasing rather than the native language(s) of the author(s)? Cleduc 18:10, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Since a week went by and nobody objected, I figured it would be fair to make this template change. I decided to stress the competence in written English.  Cleduc 01:43, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "native English speaker" 

message: Is this template really any different than Template:Copyedit? -- Beland 13:27, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not that I can tell.  Except maybe in the degree of incomprehensibility of the article... those machine-translated pieces beggar sanity. Cleduc 14:50, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I expect articles tagged either way will vary wildly in quality.  I'll redirect this new one to the older one for now.  This will also solve a Pearle-related problem. -- Beland 21:02, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Joe Craig (writer)

message: This article was listed for deletion on 20 February 2006. The discussion was closed with the result speedy keep (AfD withdrawn by nominator). This article will therefore not be deleted. You can view the discussion, which is no longer live: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Craig. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 18:30, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: JOE CRAIG
he is a very nice man who is sooooooooooooooo funny if i honestly laughed even more than i did at my school where he talked about his book i would of burst. He is so funny he could of been a comedian. He has a pet dog and used to have a goldfish.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.183.206.65 (talk) 16:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  About Joe Craig 
Talk:Rosalind Runcie

message: I find it odd that the article talks about Lady Runcie as if she is no longer with us, but gives no dates. It seems a little unkind - surely the assumption should be that she is still around, if data is not available? 138.37.199.199 18:31, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is she still alive? 

message: I removed details about her children's marriages. Wikipeia is not Burke's Peerage. The family details were formerly placed too early in the article, no doubt someone will add an infox in due course for those who find it of the greatest importance. Philip Cross (talk) 09:30, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Excessive detail