lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Peter Pan (American horse)

message: I have just rewritten the intro.  There are probably a number of other such articles that need a similar rewrite. 
Peter Pan (1904-1933) was an American Hall of Fame Thoroughbred racehorse whose sire and grandsire were also Hall of Fame inductees, as was his daughter Top Flight. 
This is not good. Peter Pan was not a "Hall of Fame" Thoroughbred. (There was no Hall of Fame, when he was racing.)  
He was a champion race horse and sire, bred by a breeder. He won yea and yea race (which is why he deserves a Wiki article and a place in the Hall of Fame).  
The fact that his sire and grandsire were also inducted into the Hall of Fame has to do with their fame, not Peter Pan's. ie. it really doesn't belong on the first paragraph. Peter Pan's fame lies in the races that he won, and the success of his descendant (he is a famous sire, as well as a famous racehorse.) And yes, his later honour needs a mention in the intro. 
Can you please check and make sure that I have put the most essential wins into that intro, and jiggle them around if I have left out anything of major significance? 
Note that I have made a separate section on the later honour, because it was so very much later, and have placed the mention of his famous antecedent in that paragraph.
Amandajm (talk) 09:54, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Introduction
Talk:Kinner Airplane & Motor Corporation

message: Dear BilCat,  In the famous words of every little kid.  "Not Me!"  All I have done is post some external links to magazines like Popular Mechanics that I find on Google Books.  So you can cross my name off the list. <GRIN> Jackehammond (talk) 03:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I know it wasn't you! I checked the history. - BilCat (talk) 07:21, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I did. It is not very polite to say "Who wrote this crap?"! English not being my mother language, I may not be able to express myself very elegantly, but as there wasn't any entry about the manufacturer in question, I (baldly, as suggested in the basic rules of Wikipedia) wrote one, hoping that somebody more fluent in the language would correct any possible errors. About "uncited entries", These events passed four years ago, and by that time there wasn't yet this rigorous hysteria about every single sentence having to be verified. Everything I wrote could be found in the external sources that I cited last in the article. Instead of just removing all  that aren't referred to, you could have read the linked pages and made the detailed references. As nobody have reacted about the ended story concerning the company, it would appear to me not being even erratic. Islander(Scandinavia) (talk) 16:07, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who wrote this ....etc 

message: * http://www.nationalairtour.org/pdf/ford_pdf_files/chapter_8_10.PDF
** http://www.nationalairtour.org/read_book.html
* https://vintageairphotos.blogspot.com/2012/08/kinner-and-his-sportster.html
* https://people.well.com/user/abs/Writing__/Nonfiction/Vlogs/SoCal_aviation.html
* 0mtwb9gd5wx (talk) 03:12, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  DATA
Talk:Dot-S

message: This article needs some images. Superjustinbros. 19:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ideally, someone should take an image of Dot-S starter kit and release it as a free image. --Jtalledo (talk) 00:08, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Thoralby

message: I have kept virtually all the work done by the most recent editor, but with a couple of tweaks to the wording. But i did remove the house price info as this is not appropriate to Wikipedia. It fluctuates too often to keep up to date and can be easily found through many more web sites. The structure is now more in line with WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements.Rimmer1993 (talk) 14:58, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update note
Talk:Catholic moral theology

message: The correct spelling of this term appears to be "dialogic".  can you please produce evidence to the contrary, if you are in possession of it? Elizium23 (talk) 11:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: by the way, you broke the link to the section heading from this article. Elizium23 (talk) 11:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dialogic
Talk:Abu Azmi

message: Can some one enlighten about his recent victory in Maharashtra Assembly polls in 2009?  Where did he win, by how many margin?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gthorvey (talk • contribs) 18:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

message: "Women who have sex outside marriage should be hanged, says SP leader Abu Azmi" -> "Any woman if, whether married or unmarried, goes along with a man, with or without her consent, should be hanged."
http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/now-abu-azmi-gives-his-two-cents-says-rape-victims-should-be-hanged/article1-1206898.aspx Hambacher (talk) 05:49, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It is unfortunate that such wretched people as Amzi are allowed to preach such draconian drivel and go unpunished. As Abe Lincoln said: "Those who deny freedom from others deserve it not for themselves, and under a just God cannot long retain it." There is hope: that when Amzi dies (soon, God willing), the infernal flames of Hell will cook him like a well-done roast, which is certainly what he deserves.GodFearingLib (talk) 01:26, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Raped Women 

message: Assalamu alaikum bhai Kaleem azmi (talk) 20:51, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  assalamu alaikum
Talk:Formal act of defection from the Catholic Church

message: as the article states the actus formalis is alluded in the canon law. It would be good to have some information about the actual origins of the act and if it was ever discussed by itself in canon law. A thing cannot be alluded to without itself existing.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.94.229.105 (talk) 17:17, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  origins? 

message: Has this been tested according to Google Scholar/Books to establish that English is not "commonly used"? In ictu oculi (talk) 04:29, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:UE]]?
Talk:Mackenzie dike swarm

message: Lately I have been wondering about the rock compostion in the Coppermine River article pics. If the rock in those pics are related to magmatism of the Mackenzie magmatic event it would be nice to add them to the article. Black Tusk (talk) 06:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 
Talk:Appointment of Catholic bishops

message: Is the approval of the pope required for the consecration of a chorbishop of an Eastern-rite Catholic church? 108.45.151.174 (talk) 00:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  question 

message: I removed this sentence, as it is not sourced, and it seems to run contrary (to my reading!) of other sources that are on the page, and elsewhere:  
My understanding is, rather the church seeking a "rigid separation of the state from religion", it is the church's way of promoting its independence and religious freedom from the state. That is a perhaps small, but important, difference.
Happy to discuss the point. 49.177.73.238 (talk) 11:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong way round 

message: * Difference between secularism and laicism
* Some articles of possible interest.
====Canon law theorist's blog====
with word press.com/2017/02/19/canon-377-%C2%A7-5-and-the-chinese-negotiations/ In the Light of the Law 49.177.73.238 (talk) 11:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related but different argument 

message: with word press.com/2017/02/19/canon-377-%C2%A7-5-and-the-chinese-negotiations/ In the Light of the Law 49.177.73.238 (talk) 11:30, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Canon law theorist's blog
Talk:Lutyens' Delhi

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 13:35, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition
Talk:Tomasz Oborski

message: Tomasz (Thomas) Oborski: 1571-1645, canonican and archebishop in Krakow. His grave is in the Wafel Cathedrale in Krakow and also a stone table to honour him.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.232.255.187 (talk) 11:48, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Talk:1999 Brazilian Grand Prix/to do

message: This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the Example race report.
Please list your sources when you have completed a task.
Report
*Start writing a report by adding race highlights or a summary.
*Expand the report with sections for pre-race, practice, qualifying and post-race.
*Cleanup the "Notes" section.  Done using ChicaneF1.com. Bobby Doorknobs 17:32, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Mikołaj Sapieha (1581–1638)

message: Also, should this really be part of Wikipedia Belarus' portal since it deals more with Lithuania and Poland?
--Khballin (talk) 20:44, 5 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed one of two stub notices. 

message: The header gives his year of birth as 1588 - but in the third paragraph he was studying in Bologna in 1582 … definitely a wunderkind!
There's also an article about Mikołaj Sapieha (1581–1644), who was also Voivode of Mińsk - but no dates are stated. Could they be one and the same?
Prisoner of Zenda (talk) 10:24, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth
Talk:Blessing of the Throats

message: I have not been everywhere, but I have never seen this blessing done with lit candles. The ritual does not call for lit candles.  The reference for lit candles does not work.  I suggest that any mention of lit candles be omitted unless a positive accessible source can be found. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 17:20, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Belated thanks for sharing your concerns. The article now includes a highlight photo with lit candles, two online references with lit candles, and a link to Wikimedia Commons showing two more pictures with lit candles. It seems to be a common practice for German-speaking Catholics. —173.68.139.31 (talk) 07:46, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  lit candles?
Talk:1999 San Marino Grand Prix/to do

message: This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the Example race report.
Please list your sources when you have completed a task.
Report
*Start writing a report by adding race highlights or a summary.
*Expand the report with sections for pre-race, practice, qualifying and post-race.
*Cleanup the "Notes" section.  Done using ChicaneF1.com. Bobby Doorknobs 00:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Lippe (district)

message: I propose to
* move the article "Lippe" about the district of Lippe to "Lippe (district)",
* move the article "Principality of Lippe" to "Lippe", to be generally about the state of Lippe,
* merge the article "Free state of Lippe" into said article "Lippe".
Currently there is no article about the state of Lippe, but two about two different historic periods of it, one of those being a stub. There should be one article about the state as such, and I don't see enough content to have main articles about historic periods.
Furthermore the article with simply "Lippe" should be about the state, not the district. --Caballito (talk) 14:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganisation of the "Lippe" articles
Talk:Wesel (district)

message: The correct description for a Landkreis seems to be County. The Deutscher Landkreistag calls itself German County Association. This really makes sense. In the context of the EU the federal system of Germany is structured as follows: 
1)	municipalities, which are local self-government bodies
2)	counties, which are also local self-government bodies
3)	districts, which are only an administrative level of the administration of the Bundesland, therefore they are better called “regional district”
4)	federal states also called regions in the European context or land
This wording is used in the European context by the German County Association, the German Association of Town and municipalities and the German Association of Cities which are the official representatives of the local government bodies.
This Nomenclature makes a clear differentiation between the self-government bodies, which are granted by the German constitution and the merely administrative level of the regional district. 
According to this definition the kreisfreie Stadt should be called County Borough. The term County Borough, even though it is now historical, describes perfectly the fact that this is a city or town independent to a county and with the self-governance competencies of a county.
Therefore I have changed this article.
:The above comment is under discussion at WT:GER Agathoclea (talk) 20:32, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  naming county or district
Talk:Odon of Poznań

message: I hope nobody objects; I've changed the default sort order in the categories.  It had been set to sort as Poznań, Odon of.  At least in :Category:House of Piast it makes more sense--and is more consistent with the bulk of the other entries--to have it sort as Odon.  If anybody feels that it should be the other way in some other category, perhaps they could change it for that particular category, rather than across the board.   71.126.140.136 (talk) 16:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changed categories sort orders
Talk:List of saints of Poland

message: The Wikipedia Title : List of Polish saints needs to be changed, if you want to keep the saints on the list as is. A more correct title would be List of saints revered in Poland or something like that. 
If you want to keep a List of Polish saints then you need to remove a number of people from that list. An Observer (71.137.197.97 (talk) 20:34, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Either: Incorrect Title or incorrect listings 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :List of saints of Poland. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 7#List of saints of Poland until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Veverve (talk) 01:34, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "List of saints of Poland" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 
Talk:1999 Monaco Grand Prix/to do

message: This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the Example race report.
Please list your sources when you have completed a task.
Report
*Start writing a report by adding race highlights or a summary.
*Expand the report with sections for pre-race, practice, qualifying and post-race.
*Cleanup the "Notes" section.  Done using ChicaneF1.com. Bobby Doorknobs 23:51, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Formula One: Built to Win

message: I have decided to remove all images not related to the general gameplay as a compromise (it's either that or the other Wikipedians eliminate all the images except for the title screen). Hopefully, the Wikipedia admins can live with that arrangment. GVnayR (talk) 17:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compromise 
Talk:1999 Spanish Grand Prix/to do

message: This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the Example race report.
Please list your sources when you have completed a task.
Report
*Start writing a report by adding race highlights or a summary.
*Expand the report with sections for pre-race, practice, qualifying and post-race.
*Cleanup the "Notes" section.  Done using ChicanF1.com. Bobby Doorknobs 23:13, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Catholic funeral

message: Is there any reason in particular that Funeral is capitalized in the title of the page? It doesn't seem to be capitalized throughout the rest of the article. --Strandist (talk) 06:27, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page name 

message: This article is poor and needs improving. I came here looking or information on what to expect at a Catholic Funeral, but the content is lots of obscure details that should be relegated to the later sections. It needs a straightforward introduction explaining the stages and procedures involved. I'm sorry I am not in a position to help improve it myself as I don't know the material!
68.37.140.16 (talk) 07:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor Article, please help. 

message: The section on hymns is entirely US based and talks about 9/11 as if it was a significant event in global Catholic history.  Needs cleaning up.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.213.243.58 (talk) 16:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed it per WP:TNT. If anyone wants to write one based on reliable secondary sources that adequately reflects international custom... then it might be too long :) Elizium23 (talk) 17:47, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  US Bias
Talk:I Advance Masked

message: Surely Bewitched should also be the next item in his chronology as well as the pair's ? -- Beardo (talk) 23:52, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summers' chronology 

message: What is that Network album mentioned in his chronology ? -- Beardo (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fripp chronology
Talk:1999 Canadian Grand Prix/to do

message: This article is a Formula One race report. For editing guidelines on style and structure, please take a look at the Example race report.
Please list your sources when you have completed a task.
Report
*Start writing a report by adding race highlights or a summary.
*Expand the report with sections for pre-race, practice, qualifying and post-race.
*Cleanup the "Notes" section.  Done using ChicaneF1.com. Bobby Doorknobs 22:18, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Vincent Burnelli

message: I read an article on the Web several years ago about the life and times of Vincent Burnelli, in which he was described as having a difficult personality.  He apparently was fairly pushy with his ideas, and unwilling to compromise or negotiate.  He presented his lifting body design concepts to a number of major U.S. aircraft manufacturers in the hope of getting them into production, but his proposals were rejected, not so much because the designs were so radically different from conventional aircraft, but because of his unbending attitude.  If someone could dig up this information for inclusion into the Wikipedia article, it would help flesh out the story.  Even though Burnelli didn't see his lifting body aircraft go into passenger and freight service, the ideas are still being considered and most recently have been revived in the Boeing X-48.  —QuicksilverT @ 20:24, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Difficult personality 

message: Burnelli's lifting-fuselage designs are by no stretch of the imagination "flying wings."  This is the definition of a flying wing from the Merriam-Webster Dictionary:  "A tailless aircraft that has the form of a left and right wing joined together at the midline with little or no apparent fuselage <Engineers call it a flying wing, or “blended wing body”. Gone is the familiar cylindrical fuselage … . Instead, the craft has a pair of thick, swept-back wings with the engines embedded inside. The tail is also gone, replaced by gyroscopes and raised “winglets” that help keep the plane stable. — Bennett Daviss, New Scientist, 24 Feb. 2007."  As can easily be seen, Burnelli's design is hardly tailless, and it certainly has a fuselage.173.62.11.254 (talk) 22:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not saying you are wrong, but this is a matter of semantics only. Admittedly, this is a dictionary so semantics do have their importance. So, yes, "lifting body" or "lifting fuselage" is the more correct term to describe these designs. Jan olieslagers (talk) 12:10, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  They're not "flying wings"
Talk:Christianity in Sri Lanka

message: Were there attacks on Christians in Sri Lanka in April 2019? If so, who is perpetrating these attacks? If the attackers are Buddhists, isn't that strange, since Buddhists are supposed to practice ahimsa (doing ho harm to other sentient beings)? 173.88.241.33 (talk) 19:56, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 2019 attacks

message: Hi all,
As the article states Thomas the apostle is the founder, and it arrived shortly after his arrival to Kerala in AD 54, it must prior to AD 72, as AD 72 is when he was martyred in Tamil Nadu (Mount St Thomas, Chennai AD 72).
Could this link also be included please as reference - https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO1309/S00362/sri-lanka-a-brief-history-of-christianity.htm
Thanks. WijeyesingheRohan (talk) 23:41, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of arrival to Sri Lanka before AD 72 martyrdom of Apostle Thomas
Talk:Confraternities of the Cord

message: I encourage the IP who has repeatedly reverted several other editors justify their unsourced additions. Edit warring without explanatory edit summaries is not acceptable. ~ Pbritti (talk) 18:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP additions 

message: : May I ask why recent edits of mine have been rolled back without a reason, although I've indicated in a version comment that the source hasn't been paraphrased but quoted word by word at length? Medusahead (talk) 08:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent reverts