lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Squashed face rattail

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 23:42, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Thorntooth grenadier

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 03:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:White hake

message: This article was based on the corresponding article at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, neither of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 04:53, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Whiting (fish)

message: I think we should split the article into a Whiting (fish) (disambiguation) page and a separate one for Merlangius. As it is, it informs the reader that the term "Whiting" is used to refer to several species of fish across a couple of distinct genera. But there is also an infobox that gives specific information for the species Merlangius merlangus. Shrumster 00:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Support:I definitely agree, over half the article is a disambiguation page while the other half is about M. merlangus and is pretty jumbled. The fact that a whole family (Sillaginidae) are known as whitings would suggest that a brief mention at the top of this article is not enough. I would further propose the article about M. merlangus be moved to English whiting, while this page remains as a disambiguation page. Kare Kare 11:30, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I'll be on it in a couple of hours. (maybe a day or two...got another wikiproject piled up) I'll be moving the specific info to Merlangius merlangus though, as English Whiting is too ambiguous to pinpoint that particular species (and is easily confusable with the tons of other fishes referred to as "whiting") per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Fishes#Fish_names_and_article_titles. Shrumster 17:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Shrumster 17:53, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split Article?
Talk:Northern bastard codling

message: The "Distribution and Habitat" section of this article claims that the Northern Bastard Codling is endemic to New Zealand. However, the introductory paragraph contradicts this when it states that this species also occurs in parts of Australia.
These pieces of information are incongruent and need amending. Megadyptes antipodes (talk) 12:31, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endemism Issue
Talk:Red codling

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 19:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
Talk:Southern bastard codling

message: This article was based on the corresponding section in Ayling's Collins Guide to the Sea Fishes of New Zealand, and/or corresponding articles at fishbase.org or niwascience.co.naz, none of which are compatibly licensed for Wikipedia. It has been revised on this date as part of a large-scale project to remove infringement from these sources. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. (For background on this situation, please see the related administrator's noticeboard discussion and the cleanup task force subpage.) Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 19:44, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Dancing tree

message: Topic of this article has nothing to do with ents, right? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 21:08, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or perhaps this one. --j.engelh 13:55, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

text: No. Kasperd (talk) 15:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ents? 

message: Has there been done any research in dancing trees other than what Hans Reiser and Namesys has done? Are there any scientific papers referring Reiser's work in this area? Dancing trees may be a good idea, but Reiser's approach seem very heuristic. Would be nice to see some actual analysis of when and why it is a good algorithm. Kasperd (talk) 15:52, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other research? 

message: The article claims that dancing trees are a tree data structure, while failing to define it as such. As a matter of fact, it only talks about issues surrounding its implementation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.132.146.66 (talk) 13:23, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor quality
Talk:Jerome Bixby

message: ". . .was a United States short story writer. . ."
Would "was a France short story writer" or "was a Portugal short story writer" make any sense?  "United States short story writer" certainly doesn't sound right.
Oddly enough, "was a US short story writer" does.  139.139.67.70 15:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this a style thing? 

message: The note that "The Man From Earth" is Bixby's last Great work is entirely slanted. His last work possibly but .. great...? Entirely subjective. This is clearly not NPOV.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.129.121.189 (talk) 12:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last Great? Work 

message: There are too many simularities in the new television series, "New Amsterdam," for it not to have been spawned from Bixby's story. (207.193.29.237 (talk) 02:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is "The Man From Earth" movie the building block for the new television series, "New Amsterdam"? 

message: and was included in Twilight Zone: The Movie (1983) -- this is incorrect. One of the four stories in the movie was called "The Cornfield" that was radically different in plot, tone, and quality from Bixby's story. e.g., in the movie Anthony, who has killed his real parents and has taken away his sister's mouth, becomes a hero at the end as he turns the cornfield pretty colors while driving to town with his teacher who convinced him to be nice. -- Jibal (talk) 04:28, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  not in Twilight Zone: The Movie (1983)
Talk:Football at the 2008 Summer Olympics

message: I could be wrong but isn't the Australian team for the Olympics the Olyroos (Australia national under-23 football team) rather than the usual Socceroos Australian team?? 1dragon (talk) 05:58, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Australian team

message: Neither from the article, nor from the reference it becomes clear _why_ England's football team is not qualified for the Olympian Football Tournament despite reaching the semi-finals of the U21 European Football Championship 2007. An explanation should be added.
The referenced webpage cites paragraph 5.1 of the "Regulations of the Olympic Football Tournaments". There it says "The associations affiliated to FIFA may participate in the Tournaments provided there is a National Olympic Committee (NOC) in their respective country which is already recognised or about to be recognised by the IOC." It seems that England does not have its own, recognised NOC (I didn't knew that). Therefore, neither the Men's nor the Woman's team is eligable for qualification. This is supported by the following BBC website: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/women/6985988.stm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.179.100.80 (talk) 11:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: England's non-qualification

message: This stadium isn't used in any match. Are you sure that it should be mentioned in the list of venues? --VovanA (talk) 10:55, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Olympic Sports Center Stadium Beijing 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Soccer at the 2008 Summer Olypmics. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 04:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Soccer at the 2008 Summer Olypmics" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Household income in the United States

message: This data is old. It is 2013 but many of the tables have the newest year as 2009. Get some new data.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.196.198.36 (talk) 14:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I just updated the main table at the top of the page with the latest data.  If you have newer data, please place a reference here and make the update yourself. Jcloudm (talk) 14:39, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've resurrected this complaint and added the template.  This data is incredibly outdated now, and is worth mentioning to casual viewers.  Especially as the new census comes out, this needs to be updated badly. 160.39.16.142 (talk) 16:49, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old data 

message: Should this article be updated to include information about the Territories of the United States? TJMSmith (talk) 16:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  US territories 

message: Reference 42 is no longer accessible via the link provided. Also, the way it's quoted in the article is strange. "…[a]verage earnings ranged from..." What does "[a]verage" imply about the formatting of the reference? I can't find the census.gov publication to figure this out, either.
I'm sure some other references are bound to 404 as well, given how old this article is. Should they just be kept up, as is?
Cheers. My apologies if this seems stupid but I'm genuinely curious about a better way to present this info. Juvanet (talk) 17:52, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, the wording is confusing (the last sentence is best, discussing increasing degrees and increasing earnings) but 2006 numbers are now outdated and could be replaced with the newest from the Census bureau.  Feel free to update this, that would be appreciated. ---Avatar317(talk) 23:01, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broken reference
Category talk:Ports and harbours

message: is there something to make the port of go away or sort them by city name in stead of the p?? poppe 07:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening comment 

message: for a discussion that might include what should be in this category, see Category talk:Port cities.  Thanks Hmains 03:00, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  what should go into this category
Talk:Hannibal's Revenge

message: Why doz'nt put the name of the showdown I' Mad and I want to Know Now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omi-707 (talk • contribs) 
What's Was the Showdown Called? What was the Game? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omi-707 (talk • contribs) 
:When the episode airs, again, someone will say what the showdown was. Ryulong 03:14, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

message: Hannibal Bean did NOT wajer the Shimostaff in te showdown does anyone know what he really wajered? -King SweaterHead 00:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've restored the correct information Jay32183 00:40, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Showdown
Talk:Wildlife Conservation Society

message: As written, this section violated Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy and should be deleted. Oliver7303 17:31, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The criticism section needed references, and was more of a political argument than a statement of fact 

message: Why on earth is more than half of this article taken up by a Fordham press release?  The new degree program is worth mentioning, but probably warrants no more than a few sentences.  It seems an enthusiastic Ram has decided to overwhelm the article on all of WCS's great work with a discussion of just one small part of that work.  I'd cut the section down to size myself but I am not an expert in any of the relevant fields and would prefer that someone with more expertise decide what should go and what should remain. 
:The section is a word-for-word transcription of a Fordham University press release (GSE and Bronx Zoo Announce Master's Degree Program). As such, it takes very little expertise indeed to determine that the section is not compatible with Wikipedia's policy on copyrighted material and I have removed the section in its entirety as a consequence of that policy. I have advised the original editor of this deletion and invite anyone to paraphrase the press release, should they think it furnishes anything useful for this article. Gosgood (talk) 16:02, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hijacked by Fordham 

message: A number of factual corrections made by WCS, along with additional historical and organizational details. ecowriter1897 19:32, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual fixes provided by Wildlife Conservation Society, May 2013
Talk:Mike Ho

message: I removed the following from Miscellanea:
* He calls his female co-star in Devil Beside You little nicknames like "Mole Queen".  He also likes poking her mole on her right cheek with miscellaneous things like tooth-picks.
I'd like to see some sort of reference to this behavior before I allow it to remain in the article.  Thanks ju66l3r 07:46, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does anyone know how to change the title from "Mike He Jun Xiang" to "Mike He"? I think that looks nicer. - Gernandes
It is truly needed to merge Mike Ho and Mike He because it is referring to one person only. The makers of the article should also generate specific information regarding the artist.  - ***confidential***  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.75.202 (talk) 03:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes
Talk:McGowan v. Maryland

message: I started reviewing Braunfeld v. Brown and ran into problems until I realized both cases are part of a set of four Sunday closing law cases from 1961. My con law book doesn't make much distinction between them, so I'm not sure how to handle the situation. I'm happy to create a page for all four cases, but my main question is whether we should merge them into that page or leave them separately. Apparently there were "only" twelve separate opinions, so my own opinion is to merge. Thoughts?--Chaser T 07:47, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My instinct would be to leave them as separate pages, but add some kind of collective page on "Sunday closing laws" that discusses the four plus the laws' history and status.  I don't feel particularly strongly, though.  TheronJ 10:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:English Bridge Union

message: It became clear that a full history of the EBU needed to be written on this page. I've done this now and written for this Wiki page. Matt (talk) 10:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately I've just noticed that the History section seems to be pretty much a word for word copying of the online article that is given as the reference at the end of the section. It thus has copyright issues. I'll try to reword it. JH (talk page) 20:05, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: History update

message: I have thoroughly updated this page with more details on the EBU and hope it is a lot more factual now. Matt - London 13:22, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Update 2007
Talk:Greek National Socialist Party

message: what was its name in Greek? --Soman 07:55, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Red House Mystery

message: I found :Image:AAMilne TheRedHouseMystery.jpg and noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. Someone will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If it was obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the  tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as  or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If there are other files on this page, consider checking that they have specified their source and are tagged properly, too. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unspecified source for [[:Image:AAMilne TheRedHouseMystery.jpg]]

message: :Image:AAMilne TheRedHouseMystery.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:AAMilne TheRedHouseMystery.jpg

message: The Red House Mystery is a Upcoming American–British–Canadian Live-action/stop motion supernatural mystery fantasy film directed by Terry Gilliam produced by Illumination, Bron Studios, Hammer Films Productions released by Universal Pictures. 92.40.213.33 (talk) 14:14, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Terry Gilliam's The Red House Mystery
File talk:Ashkenazi and mizrahi male and female.jpg

message: Just in case you were interested. This picture was taken in June 2003, shortly before this couple was married. They love the picture, and I contributed it to Wikipedia with their permission. In California, there has been a great deal of intermarriage between Jews from different Jewish traditions, probably more than anywhere else in the United States.  I've been looking for statistics on the subject, but nobody seems to be collecting them or keeping them.  --Metzenberg 07:56, 29 June 2006 (UTC)