lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Javadoc

message: -- no official sun javadoc has search, unless embedded in other 3rd party web pages. Criticism should stay, but I agree it needs to be revamped.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.150.164 (talk) 09:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I removed two links in the introduction.  One to Programmer's File Editors which did not seem specific to Javadoc and the other to http://www.slickedit.com, where the page did not provide any relevant information about what it claimed to reference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiuser1239 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference in introduction 

message: >>Structure of a Javadoc comment
...
>>The first paragraph is a description of the method documented.
The article launches in as if methods are the only thing worth Javadoc-ing - what about Javadoc for classes, packages and the like? Renny Barrett (talk) 23:31, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, that was my first thought on reading through the page. 2601:843:C200:C8:B70A:9CA2:E6:7BDD (talk) 14:34, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  A bit method-centric 

message: I think that there is a mistake in example. 
Current version:
 * @version     1.6                 (the version of the package this class was first added to)                   
 * @since       2010-03-31          (a date or the version number of this program)
Correct version (?):
 * @version     1.6                 (a date or the version number of this program)                   
 * @since       2010-03-31          (the version of the package this class was first added to)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.3.50.254 (talk) 12:54, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in example?

message: There is one kind of Javadoc comment missing here, the @jls tag, which specifies a link to the Java Language Specification (used in Java API javadoc). Gparyani (talk) 18:51, 13 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  @jls Comments 

message: So when did Knuth invent Literate Programming again?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.162.181.145 (talk) 00:54, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Javadoc was one of the first documentation generators" 

message: Even though they were bought out, Sun Microsystems should be credited directly with maybe a mention of them being bought out. I'd change it myself, but I can't be arsed getting into an edit war with some wiki elitist. So I request you to please apply my change, dear sir or madam. - Gav 19:37 BST - 26/06/2015  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.26.31.181 (talk) 18:40, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Oracle as the company that created it / DONE 

message: I propose that we merge Doclet into Javadoc - doclets are a part of Javadoc and have no significance outside of that. LucyPoulton (talk) 08:27, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:HNLMS Java

message: This article does not contain much new information when compared to the Java class cruiser article. It would be more efficient to have one page for the class as a whole and have the entries HNLMS Java and HNLMS Sumatra refer to that page (In particular since the career of the latter ship was rather unremarkable). Paaskynen 08:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roosevelt High School (Washington)

message: :Nice to see that someone started this! Unfortunately, I graduated too long ago to help with current info. Is the Jazz Band still winning awards? Is the school motto still something like "what I am to be I am now becomming"? (Why I remember this I don't know.) These could be mentioned. And there is this - http://www.npr.org/news/specials/roosevelt/, a year-long series on NPR of Roosevelt and the 2002-03 school year. -Bert, class of '87 171.159.64.10 01:55, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This does not seem very neutral: "The Roosevelt News is a 28 to 36-page monthly production which regularly puts the Ballard Talisman (well-known rag) to shame"
--DerRichter 06:41, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: I removed a list of clubs becuase every school has lots of clubs, but if any are notable, meaning they stand out from the usual list for some reason, they may be reintroduced.  Also, names of high school athletes and claims like "the facilities are excellent" with no citation are inappropriate for wikipedia, but feel free to discuss.  --DerRichter (talk) 10:17, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clubs
Talk:Madame Xanadu

message: Not created by Michelinie and Mayerik, but the character design was discovered in Kaluta's sketchbooks, stories were written after Kaluta's covers.  I don't have a Wikipedia-acceptable citation, but I was there. Perhaps, now that Michael is drawing an arc in the new series, someone will interview him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.61.26.164 (talk) 13:09, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Creation

message: A minor issue, but the picture is of poor quality and doesn't represent the character very clearly. I would suggest using an image from the recent Vertigo series by Amy Reeder Hadley: http://www.comicbookbin.com/artman2/uploads/5/xanaducover10large.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kalvoid (talk • contribs) 00:56, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update picture 
Talk:Siege of Odessa

message: No such event reported apart the sources listed that appears to be quite pro-Romanian literature. The article provide no details of the attack nor the name of the alleged ship attacked. There is no trace in English or Russian literature with details of the attack or identity of ship attacked.  
The only confirmed MTB attack resulting in hit on destroyer in Black Sea was done by Italian craft MTSM-216 against destroyr "Svobodnyi" on 9 June 1942: dud hit, Soviets neither noticed it. Italians wrongly mistaken the ship as leader flottilla "Tashkent".   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lupodimare89 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Romanian MTB action 

message: I've removed the Romanian recognition section, including pictures of the awards:
*To recognize the long and very costly siege of the city the Romanian authorities awarded the participants with an bronze or silver ODESA bar when they instituted the Crusade Against Communism medal (Cruciada împotriva comunismului) by a Royal Decree in April 1942.
This section is undue, as the articles on sieges normally do not recognise the invading party. If I'm mistaken, please provide examples where similar articles contain such sections. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edit 

message: This section is undue, as the articles on sieges normally do not recognise the invading party. If I'm mistaken, please provide examples where similar articles contain such sections. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:24, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commerations 

message: The section is undue and I removed it diff. Please discuss on Talk page before reverting (see WP:BRD).
Instead, this may be useful in an article on the Romanian military decorations of WWII. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Compare with Demyansk Pocket; there's no discussion of the Wehrmacht instituting the Demyansk Shield in that article. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:15, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe that's more a fault in the Demyansk Pocket article. As I've asked, why have just one sides commerations? If military awards should be discussed in an separate article the Russian side should be gone as well. As you wrote earlier that sieges normally do not recognize the invading party but still you have the Russain Commemoration for the Battle of Berlin Medal on the Battle for Berlin article.Metal Gear Rex (talk) 05:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed both medals; pls see diff. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:34, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Undue section
Talk:Clairvaux MacKillop College

message: I always thought Br Walker was the first principal???.  When did he arrive.  I was in Clairvaux in 1972.
--Dmol 09:13, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Clairvaux MacKillop is spelt with a capital "K" in MacKillop, as noted on the website and in the school newsletter. Could this page get renamed to match this? 203.171.97.75 (talk) 21:33, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed now. Thanks for pointing it out.--Dmol (talk) 21:58, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 

message: I have added a section called School laptop program. Unfortunately, the school website lacks public information on this program. Any public information on this would be appreciated. Andrewr04 (talk) 03:14, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  School laptop program 

message: We have a new principal now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harrym13 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hey uhh..
Talk:Doctor Occult

message: How many links do we need before an 'Orphan tag' can go away? Doctor Occult had plenty of links, even before I added a bunch and that was weeks and months ago (not to mention the little bit more I added yesterday). Lots42 (talk) 10:36, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphan Tag 

message: *goodcomics.comicbookresources.com/2007/03/25/365-reasons-to-love-comics-84/
*http://techland.time.com/2010/07/05/75-years-of-the-first-comic-book-superhero-its-not-who-you-think/
*http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=53385
Jhenderson 777 21:13, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources to use 
Talk:PG Tips

message: Why is the pronunciation Pidge Tips? It's pee gee tips.  Whitelined (talk) 06:17, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: UKIP FarRight Sargon
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oLS30MfJt00
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sargon_of_Akkad
Laura Towler, supporter of Facist Oswald Mosley
Mark Collet of BNP
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Collett
PG and Yorkshire Tea tell Black Lives Matter critics 'don't buy our tea'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/business-52978990
Thank you PG  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nofacisttea (talk • contribs) 01:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  PG support Black lives matter not Far Right Facism 

message: should there be updates to the advertising section? I saw the latest campaign which is "It's not just tea, it's progress." Visokor (talk) 07:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  advertising update?
Talk:Lyn Me

message: Lyn_Me → Minor_residents_of_Tatooine – {This article hardly has any information on the character, and she has a far smaller role than many of the other minor residents of Tatooine.}
===Survey===
:Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose.  Target page already exists.  This can be useful as a redirect, no need to move the entire article over. - Hbdragon88 05:15, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Closed as no consensus. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 13:54, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
*Oppose.  Target page already exists.  This can be useful as a redirect, no need to move the entire article over. - Hbdragon88 05:15, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Closed as no consensus. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 13:54, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Redirected to Max Rebo Band to place in context. This article by itself is asking to be deleted. Not notable enough for own article. See WP:WAF. Dmoon1 06:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:Social Democracy of Poland

message: On their (English) website http://www.sdpl.org.pl/english.htm, this part refers to itself as the 'Social Democratic Party of Poland'. So I plan to move this article to that name unless anyone objects. Colonies Chris 09:48, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:The Beach Boys in Concert

message: Took out a bias part about song section and brain not being there, the facts themselves could be re added without the opinion Seth slackware 00:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: bias
Talk:Eel catfish

message: Potential sources:  "Slashdot: African catfish hunts on land". See also:  *innocent look*. 80.126.238.189 09:58, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:The Celts (album)

message: Shouldn't it be merged with Enya (album)? The only thing that makes the two albums different is the length of one of the tracks. – Alensha talk 22:26, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If the album was worthy of a name change I believe it should be kept as two albums if only for clarification. Also you don't see the "Enya" album in stores, it is "Celts" that is being circulated. I think it just adds confusion and anyone referencing these albums on Wikipedia will instantly see that one is a reissue since it is mentioned in the article. That's my ¢.02, cheers Nikolai Ruzimatov (talk) 14:36, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merging

message: There are now two sections titled "Charts".  More informative headings would be good, or so I thought (when I changed the heading "Charts and Certifications" to "Sales"). —Tamfang (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  charts of what?
Talk:Valian Years

message: I think I've clarified the relationship between Valian and other years, but I'm still not sure whether the Years of the Lamps and the Years of the Trees are the same length as a Valian Year. I seem to remember something about the Years of the Trees being shorter than the Years of the Lamps, but I may be misremembering. Was the definition of a Valian Year changed to fit that of the Years of the Lamps, and then to fit that of the Years of the Trees, or was a Valian Year always different from these other two? If the former, then "Years of the Lamps" and "Years of the Trees" would be types of Valian Years, in a way that "Years of the Sun" have never been. If the latter, then Valian Years are just a different way to define a year, as I've said. But further clarification and references would be good. Carcharoth 09:59, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarified relationship between Valian and other years 

message: I think that the article is wrong when stating that there were "approximately 9.58 solar years in each Valian year". There are several indicators for this:
According to the Annlas of Arda (which is linked in the Extenal links section of the article) 9.58 solar years was the duration of a Year of the Trees. 
Earlier versions of this article (until 6 March 2006) say that a Valian year was 1.4 years (I think "years" refers to solar years).
The Article Timeline of Arda, which gives dates in Valian Years, says that the Crossing of Helcaraxë took three years (4997-5000). According to the current version of this article this would be 29 Years of the Sun. I think this is far too long.--Galadh 19:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It does seem paradoxical, even moreso when you consider that Tolkien's later conception was that a Valian year was equivalent to 144 solar years, but he provided an explanation for this. Specifically, time itself passed differently in Aman and before the rise of the Sun to the point that while a Valian year might be 9.58 (or 144) times as long as a Solar year in absolute terms the two seemed about the same length in perception. Think of the description of Lothlorien in The Lord of the Rings. It seemed to the Fellowship as if they spent only a few days there, but in actuality a month had passed. Likewise for the timeless quality mentioned at Rivendell. This was what the Three Rings were created for... an attempt to re-create the seeming timelessness / changelessness of Aman within Middle-earth itself. --CBD 21:50, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Duration of a Valian Year
Talk:Jean-Pierre Norblin de La Gourdaine

message: What's the point of writing a date of last visit in references? Who is going to update it? sirix
:If the link dies, you know which Internet Archive version to check.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:37, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: About references
Talk:Tomb of the Unknown Soldier (Romania)

message: Hi, Bogdan, the monument in the first picture is the Mausoleum of the Communist Heroes built in the '50s, when the Tomb was unjustly moved to Mărășești. IMO this picture doesn't belong here (maybe in an article about the Carol Park in Bucharest). Mentatus 10:00, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mausoleum
Talk:The Greatest Hits – Volume 1: 20 Good Vibrations

message: 409 is the second not the 17th track. Daniel Christensen (talk) 15:26, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 409
Talk:Uwe Kreisel

message: I checked on www.amazon.de. All books listed are actually written by Uwe Kreisel. The claim that "Most books listed apparently written by other author" is wrong!
:My mistake on that comment - I misread "written with" as "written by". Could you provide some citations for the major newspapers' reviews? If so we can remove the notability tag. --AbsolutDan (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Great work! Ok I'll remove the tag. Some of the above should be incorporated into the article itself, or at least proper citations for it. --AbsolutDan (talk) 14:25, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments by AbsolutDan
Talk:N. Scott Momaday

message: Gets kind of confusing, doncha know. On the Wiki page about House of Dawn we get--" ..... something his father, Al Momaday, and his mother taught him to do,....." and on this here page we get "N. Scott Momaday is the son of writer Natachee Scott Momaday and painter Al Momaday."
Anybody able to resolve this?
Smaxam (talk) 04:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Um. Both articles identify his father as Al Momaday. It's kinda weird that his mother goes unnamed in one of the articles, but there doesn't appear to be any conflict between them. What would need resolving? Binabik80 (talk) 04:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Suspect the OP thought Natachee was the father, as father's names are conventionally given first.  Though given his mother's importance to Momaday, I agree with the original wording. Vizjim (talk) 12:17, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I want to make note here that Mayme 'Natachee' Scott never attended Haskell Institute (It mentions that she did in one of the sources that claims she was Cherokee). It's pretty easy to verify.http://carlisleindian.dickinson.edu/taxonomy/term/26182/student-filesIndigenous girl (talk) 21:54, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Al
Talk:Death Unlimited

message: Would be relevant to notice the use of Cyrillic characters in the album title on the cover, as there's an article on so-called Faux Cyrillic... (sorry I'm too lazy to come up with a sentence and edit atm) :P —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.70.193.2 (talk) 12:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Faux Cyrillic 
Talk:Elsecar Heritage Centre

message: What is "http://www.answers.com/topic/elsecar-heritage-centre"?
The information seems to be the same as here, which seems suspicious.
:answers.com is a mirror of Wikipedia. Its not a problem. josh (talk) 16:07, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:To the Power of Three

message: :Image:3 ToThePowerOfThree.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:3 ToThePowerOfThree.jpg
Talk:Rick Flag

message: His name is spelt wrong, in fact the page name is wrong it should be Rick Flag.
:Nope, the guy's name is Rick Flagg. Two g's. Kusonaga 11:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry K, it is Flag. Already fixed. -- Basique 16:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Yeah, I just checked my Suicide Squad issues. You're right. I'm quite dumbfounded actually. Kusonaga 17:05, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Likewise.  I see the two g spelling all over the net though.  Maybe there's a similarly named character out there somewhere that got people confused and it just spread.D1Puck1T 22:12, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a GI Joe character named General Flagg -- perhaps that's the confusion?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.61.255.171 (talk) 20:53, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

text: He's called Rick Flagg in DC: The New Frontier. Kusonaga 09:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rick Flag

message: He was shown in the astral plane twice, in Captain Atom#42 and during the Day of Vengeance mini-series.
00:41, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shown in astral plane twice

message: "After that he enjoyed increasing success and decreasing mortality." --should that maybe be "decreasing morality"? Xcbsmith (talk)   — Preceding undated comment added 00:40, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: =Decreasing mortality
Talk:Unit (album)

message: For Ausmusic month, Triple J is discussing the history of four albums, the first being Unit. Lots of good info in it. TRS-80 (talk) 01:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Album Series 
Talk:Wake Pig

message: :Image:3 Wakepig.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:37, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:3 Wakepig.jpg