Talk:Bridal Chorus

message: A section is entitled .  Can you determine whether this is still required, and which components you consider should be moved.  Also, we would require for the source of the translation to be identified to ensure that there is no copyright violation on that component.  Thx.-- billinghurst (talk) 03:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy to Wikisource 

message: Substituted at 10:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bridal Chorus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080607084921/http://www.lcms.org:80/pages/internal.asp?NavID=3928 to http://www.lcms.org/pages/internal.asp?NavID=3928
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070927010933/http://www.diocese-sdiego.org/OLSFiles/LITURGY%20OLD/Guidelines_English/Wedmus.pdf to http://www.diocese-sdiego.org/OLSFiles/LITURGY%20OLD/Guidelines_English/Wedmus.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:55, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "Here comes the bride" sticks because it is prosodically close to the actual melody. The Dutch language imitates this effect with "Daar komt de bruid." It would be interesting to compile examples from other languages, if they exist. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:CD57:225A:899:19C9 (talk) 08:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daar komt de bruid 

message: The "Religious attitudes" section runs completely counter to WP:DUE. Somebody's (unsigned) answer to a question on the LCMS website and a short document from the San Diego Catholic diocese (again unsigned, and not showing any ) cannot be taken as representing the attitude of the Lutheran and the Catholic Church at large. Either a proper, reliable secondary source should be produced showing the attitude of the two churches (if indeed they have an official attitude) or the section should be deleted. 2001:BB6:4713:4858:1C2E:28:BB7A:70B8 (talk) 11:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Presenting attitudes of major religions to the use of "Bridal Chorus" in wedding ceremonies doesn't seem undue to me. The cited sources come from reputable sources, and many more can be found. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 12:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: WP:DUE says,"Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by reliable sources, in proportion to the prominence of each viewpoint in the published, reliable sources." It's not a question of whether "many more can be found" (which I doubt), but what proportion of the total literature on the Bridal Chorus emphasises this viewpoint. WP:RS says, "Articles should be based on reliable, independent, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. That cannot be said of these two web pages (both of which, by the way, are dead links only accessible through the Wayback machine). Are there books, journal articles, and/or web pages on scholarly sites presenting the views of known experts that "present attitudes of major religions to the use of 'Bridal Chorus' in wedding ceremonies"? If not, then the section gives undue weight to the views of a couple of anonymous people, and should be deleted. 2001:BB6:4713:4858:9886:5DFE:6138:BBA9 (talk) 12:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: This article's 1st sentence certainly warrants mentioning the attitude towards its performance in church services. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:03, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: As for further sources: page 118 of Catholic Mass For Dummies by Rev. John Trigilio, Jr. (Wiley, 2011) is a low-hanging search result. Then there's an article from 15 April 1971 in The New York Times, "Vatican Word on Music May Rule Out 'Here Comes the Bride' " by Enid Nemy, which reports that it had been banned for some years and will continue so in St Patrick's Cathedral. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 14:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious attitudes 

message: Due to controversies about Wagner and antisemitism, playing his music is divisive in Israel - I wonder if that expands to Jews elsewhere and to Bridal Chorus in particular. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KingAlanI (talk • contribs) 05:05, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Addition to the religious attitudes section?