lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of endemic flora of Puerto Rico

message: Hasn't that been synonymised with Zamia pumila (and thus is no longer endemic)?  Guettarda 02:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As always you seem to be correct. I have yet to find the paper where it was synonimzed but the USDA website does have it as a synonym.  Joelito (talk) 02:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I found a good reference.  I believe that Liogier's 2001(?) checklist followed Eckenwalder in synonymising them, but Acevedo's work now stands as the most authoritative for Zamia is PR, so I would be inclined to include it, together with his note.  Guettarda 20:11, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Zamia portoricensis

message: An anon added (part in italics)
This is indeed true. Tolumnia variegata is in the tribe Cymbidieae, Psychilis is in the tribe Epidendrae.  Morphologically and florally they are grossly different, the inclusion of this photo on the page is a source of confusion, someone misidentified this plant and then wrongly included the photo here perpetuating the error.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.50.55.236 (talk) 03:04, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the picture. When you find a problem on wikipedia, feel free to correct it. Thanks. --Kleopatra (talk) 17:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this true? 

message: I removed a lot of plants with articles that say they are native to Puerto Rico and parts of Hispaniola and the US or British Virgin Islands.
"Endemic to Puerto Rico" means native only to Puerto Rico. If it is native to anywhere else, in addition to Puerto Rico, it is no "endemic to Puerto Rico. There might be an article or list on Caribbean endemics, and these plants, except for the one native also to northern South America, would be appropriately placed on that list. --Kleopatra (talk) 17:37, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Endemism
Talk:Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders

message: The correct title of this case is Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.  This is how it appears in List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 472, and is how the case should be cited under Bluebook rules.  For these reasons, I'm going to move this page (unchanged, of course), to the correctly named page and turn this page into a redirect.  Hydriotaphia 05:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Constantian Society

message: Is the Constantian Society still active? Their website hasn't been updated since 1999. Is there a more recent one we should put? Thanks--Geremia (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears from the Internet that its activities ceased with the death of its founder Randall Dicks.  I sent an email to monarchy@put.com and if it not answered, I will put the article into past tense, and add the appropriate defunct categories. patsw (talk) 01:06, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No response.  If I or anyone gets evidence of its continuation, of course, make the appropriate changes to the article. patsw (talk) 01:28, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still exists? 
Talk:Rüti, Zürich

message: IP's (propably same 'user') repeatedly replaced images and/or removed image descriptions without any comment, Roland 00:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: requests for changes to the page protection level should be made at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. --Jnorton7558 (talk) 01:58, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
Talk:7, Lok Kalyan Marg

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 03:58, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: Is it convention in India to put a comma after the street number when writing an address?  RJFJR (talk) 13:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:30, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There shouldn't be a comma after the house/unit number; I've never seen this anywhere. Getsnoopy (talk) 22:27, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Punctuation

message: Allbank 157.41.31.126 (talk) 14:44, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bargarhodisha
Talk:Schönenberg, Zürich

message: Many thousands of people in Europe and throughout the world trace their family name to Schönenberg - some called by variations of Schönenberger. I would greatly appreciate information about the history of Schönenberg - a Swiss historian told me that it is unlikely anyone with a family name more than a few hundred years old can be traced to Schönenberg, because this town is not many centuries old. Yet I find "cousins" from Germany tracing their family name to this town many centuries back. Could the naming of the area pre-date the naming of the town?  What historical guidance can be given those seeing their roots in Schönenberg?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.69.77.150 (talk) 05:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Alvadore, Oregon

message: I can vouch for most of the info in this article, but that's original research. Not much info to be found on-line. Does anybody have anything from a print source, especially on the early history? And if someone could snap a photo of that wonderful old school building, that would be great--it's next to Decker Nursery. Katr67 02:51, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently the building was demolished, maybe has one s/he can scan... Katr67 01:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources?
Talk:WBXC-CD

message: Wikipedia's own list of America One affiliates (as well as the list on America One's site) do not mention this station, and, in my own testing from Danville, I've never been able to tune in this station.  Can someone in Champaign proper determine whether this station is still on air and, if so, what content is broadcast on it?  98.212.243.45 (talk) 05:40, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confirmation of Existence and Content?
Talk:WDEM-CD

message: Why has the test signal been on for three days for channel 17 2600:1700:FA70:3B70:C99C:9606:B8BB:6E8D (talk) 17:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Test signal
Talk:WEVU-LP

message: WEVU-CA channel 4 (along with translator WBSP-CA channel 7) began in the late 80's as W07BR channel 7 (translator: W09BS channel 9). It was originally a part of the Channel America Television Network. In the early 90's they switched to American Independent Network (AIN). Around the mid-90's as they dropped AIN for Network One (N1) Television, WEVU TV channel 26 dropped their call letters for WZVN. Caloosa Television, then-owners of the low-power stations, picked up the WEVU calls for channel 7; it became WEVU-LP (W09BS had its call letters changed to WBSP-LP). They were billing the station as "The Real Channel 7" (this was as a result of WZVN billing itself as "ABC 7" after their cable channel placement; WEVU-LP was on cable channel 8 in the Fort Myers cable system).
In March of 1998, WTVK, which was the UPN affiliate, dropped UPN for WB. The original WB affiliate, MediaOne (now Comcast) Cable's "WB 10" (with faux calls of "WSWF") picked up UPN. However, not everyone in the market could get "TV 10" (as it was later called). Therefore, UPN made an affiliation deal with WEVU, which would allow for wider coverage.
It wasn't until later in 1998 when Caloosa Television made a deal with MediaOne, having the cable system take over programming duties. MediaOne dropped the faux calls of "WSWF" and replaced it with WEVU. Outside of UPN (which is the only thing in common), MediaOne replaced WEVU's non-network programming with their own, thus unifying the UPN affiliates in the market.
This working relationship lasted until midnight of September 01, 2004. This occurred shortly after Holston Valley Broadcasting (WEVU) struck a deal for carriage of WEVU (then known on-the-air as "UPN 8") on DirecTV. This forced WEVU to seek UPN programming via microwave from UPN O&O WTOG (now "CW 44") out of Saint Petersburg (FL). They would also air the three-hour E/I block from UPN 44. The rest of the time it was paid programming/infomercials. Comcast, meanwhile, continued business as usual. "UPN 8" now went by the faux call letters of "WNFM." WEVU was later picked up by DISH Network.
When UPN ended broadcasting in September 2006, WEVU filled the time slot with more paid programming/infomercials. By this time they were simulcasting the six o'clock news from Univision affiliate WUVF-CA. WEVU had also been purchased by Equity Broadcasting, owners of WUVF. Equity decided to rebroadcast WUVF on WEVU (since WUVF is not on DBS but WEVU is).
In 2007 Equity struck a deal with LatinAmerican Broadcasting to carry LAT TV on its group of stations beginning May 2007; WEVU was to be one of the stations. To this date (Feb 2008), WEVU is rebroadcasting WUVF. It is also reflected in the call announcements at the top of the hour.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by LaGarza (talk • contribs) 21:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WFBT-CA

message: When WFBT becomes WMEU on Saturday, March 1, will there be a new website? And if so, what will the new website be called? AdamDeanHall (talk) 16:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think maybe this page could be 'moved', which also creates an automatic redirect (rename a page). This would allow other links to work, although you can use the 'what links here' option on the left side of the page to edit other pages to directly point at the new page. I assume the full name would be WMEU-CA, too. If some other broadcaster uses WFBT-CA in the future, the redirect can be edited into a real entry. Andyross (talk) 22:50, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  When WFBT becomes WMEU, will there be a new website? 

message: Isn't WFBT already a subchannel of WCIU-DT? I don't have an ATSC tuner, but I think I read it's 26.3 (with WWME being 26.2). If so, then the current programming will either move to a new subchannel (26.4?), or WMEU will not be a subchannel?? Andyross (talk) 23:04, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: From a post at website frequented by a WCIU technician, the current WFBT programming will be moved to 26.6. No idea what 26.4 and .5 will be! They are using a VBR encoder. It's a good thing 26.1 is 720p.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andyross (talk • contribs) 15:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WCIU subchannel
Talk:WGCT-CD

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Kids' Fun Festival. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 22#Kids' Fun Festival until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  signed, Rosguill talk 17:22, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Kids' Fun Festival" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:WLFT-CD

message: Why am I getting a malware warning when I click on the weblink in the infobox? Sophie means wisdom (talk) 12:00, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Malware warning?

message: Although some sites, including Rabbitears.info and TV Guide, list WLFT 30.4 as an Antenna TV affiliate, from watching said channel, it seems 30.4 is still carrying Soul of the South, as of June 2016.  It is possible the station may eventually gain an Antenna TV affiliate, but, as of now, WLFT is NOT airing Antenna TV's programming, nor is any other station in Baton Rouge.  Note that the official website for Antenna TV does NOT list a Baton Rouge affiliate. Jackx3 (talk) 03:55, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  30.4 Affiliation
Talk:WMBQ-CD

message: There are some inaccuracies in the wikipedia page. Tvstationfan101 (talk) 06:03, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing 

message: Why not accept my version? Tvstationfan101 (talk) 17:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: You can partake in the discussion above – Thjarkur (talk) 15:33, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 15 December 2020
Talk:WNYF-CD

message: The infobox lists 
:Transmitter Coordinates 	
:WNYF-CA: 43°57′23″N, 75°50′26″W
:WNYF-LP: 43°54′14″N, 75°53′1″W
...and the repeater is licensed to Massena? That can't make sense, Cornwall-Massena is on 45°N as the international boundary that extends eastward across Vermont. 44°N is credible for Watertown, not Massena. --carlb (talk) 17:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  co-ordinates 

message: The "History - Before becoming a separate full-time Fox affiliate, WNYF-CA was a translator for ABC affiliate WWTI." makes no sense if both WWTI and WNYF are in the same location (Watertown). Unless the station was moved at some point, this seems to be erroneous. --66.102.80.212 (talk) 19:17, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWTI repeater? 
Talk:WVTT-CD

message: It has been errantly reported in earlier versions of this article that WONS was a repeater/translator for WNGS channel 67 in Springville, NY. While WONS had an agreement to share the UPN network affiliation with WNGS in order for the network line-up to be available in the Greater Olean area, WONS was never a repeater/translator for WNGS. WONS placed the channel 67 logo on the lower right-hand corner of the screen during the UPN programming blocks in order for WNGS to receive the ratings credit for those who had Nielsen ratings diaries. No other WNGS programming was ever broadcast by WONS. The station discontinued the UPN programming when WNGS was given cable carriage in the Olean area to eliminate the duplicate programming.
Also, the date given for the first sign-on is inaccurate. The article states that the station first signed on the air March 7, 1986. That is the date the license was awarded. The station didn't actually begin regular broadcasting until November or December of 1986. I don't recall the exact date. I started working at WONS (then known as W20AB channel 20) in January 1987 and left in July 2000. RevJPW (talk) 18:12, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WONS
Talk:Mike Royce

message: Would'nt it be usefull to a) add the actors name for the mentioned partners (e. g. Lisa Edelstein), b) add a Link to main articles (Richard Castle) and c) add a hint in Mike Royce that there is a role name Mike Royce to (with Link to Castle)? --Kai.pedia (talk) 13:54, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Kate_Beckett#Partners]]
Talk:Silvermine, Connecticut

message: A bunch of editors have been debating (elsewhere, as well as above) when and where it is helpful to have separate articles on NRHP HDs, like about "Silvermine Center Historic District", vs. when it is best to include the NRHP info in an article about a village/hamlet/neighborhood like this "Silvermine, Connecticut" article.
Some of the editors (me included) agree that for Silvermine and Silvermine Center HD we currently want a merged article.  But if there is someone who wants to make a decent separate article, that would be okay too.  We just ask, please don't split out a separate NRHP HD article unless
a) you have created or are actively developing a DYK-equivalent length starter article using substantial information, and
b) you judge in good faith that it is beneficial to have the NRHP HD be a separate article.
Note, for all CT NRHPs, a good source is available, the NRHP nomination document, provided free of charge upon email request to nr_reference (at) nps.gov.  And, in December 2010, the National Register has just made available online copies of almost all of the NRHP documents for CT:  see search screen here.  However the Silvermine Center HD document is not currently available on-line.
Currently, "Silvermine Center Historic District" is set to redirect to "Silvermine, Connecticut".  (Equivalent notice being placed at Talk:Silvermine Center Historic District.) --doncram (talk) 14:45, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate NRHP HD article or not 

message: anyone know of any hautnings.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.119.66.157 (talk) 23:41, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  haunted legends in silvermine
Talk:Mertens v. Hewitt Associates

message: Someone who understands this case needs to fix the background section. It has broken links, says Scalia made a mistake (would Scalia agree? if not, POV) and is badly written.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.94.195.168 (talk) 22:08, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Background section 

message: I completely agree with the previous comment. Right now, this article focuses almost entirely on Langbein's criticism of the Supreme Court's decision (i.e., Scalia's opinion) in Mertens. Langbein's criticism of Merterns is definitely worth including in this article. But it shouldn't be the entire article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:EA00:104:1000:10F8:40C4:1378:3CC2 (talk) 21:33, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Focuses too much on a law review article rather than the actual case 

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Ninepin Group

message: An article about the islands (in Chinese) can be found at http://hk.geocities.com/adatai2004/20050611.htm. olivier 03:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to category, but no mention in text. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 11:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dive site?
Talk:Andi Sex Gang

message: Is it Sex Gang or Sexgang? I've seen it as both regarding Andi's name. - Deathrocker 03:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Do we have any independent, published, reliable sources that support the spelling? —C.Fred (talk) 23:21, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

text: The word "Gang" in the name has to be capitalized, as part of a proper noun. Greg Fasolino (talk) 20:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article as it stands is poorly written and in dire need of revision. Greg Fasolino (talk) 20:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvement
Talk:Snøhetta

message: The name Snøhetta originates from the mountain.  Other uses are derivations.  Hence I think the mountain (rather than the company) deserves the main entry Snøhetta.  
Suggested moves:   
Snøhetta  →  Snøhetta_(company)
Snøhetta_(mountain)  →  Snøhetta
--Gsv 14:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. --Berland 18:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest moving to <nowiki>[[Snøhetta]]</nowiki> 

message: Panorama from the summit of Snøhetta is available here, but I won't add this to External links myself as it is my own webpage. If some other editor finds it worthy of inclusion per WP:External links, please add it. --Berland 19:39, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Very nice, thanks. Viewfinder 20:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panorama from Snøhetta
Talk:Semisonic

message: I think the article should have a better image than a basement performance, I can barely see the band. Jjkoletar (talk) 22:21, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It has to be a non-copyrighted image. That's probably the best one Wikipedia has access to under those rules. 174.6.69.189 (talk) 00:08, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better Image 

message: While the infobox about the band's chart performance contains some sources, the actual text of the article contains only two (2). SunCrow (talk) 20:54, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs LOTS more sources
Talk:Pashtun culture

message: what is your say on this.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.173.174.134 (talk) 05:17, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Isn't Pashtun culture considered Iranian like Balochi culture??
Talk:Hogan's Alley, Vancouver

message: This was still there during Expo '86; a grey-covered glass-stucco house about six storefronts off of Main, on Prior; steep, narrow steps, small windows, hand-painted sign; apparently inside were tiny tables w. red-checkered tableclothes, just big enough to put the plates on; and the steaks were bigger than the plates.  Never did eat there but sure dropped off a lot of customers who'd heard of it; when it closed it was featured in the local paper (either history or restaurant reviewer) as the last remnant of Hogan's Alley; I don't have a picture of it but posting this as a lead to anyone with the time and interest to poke through the Vancouver Sun archives to find a pic and its obituary.Skookum1 20:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Vie's Steak's

message: Presumably named after the 1890's comic strip discussed at The Yellow Kid? Anyone with reliable info please add a link. --Cheakamus (talk) 20:52, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Is this a good enough source? Secret Vancouver: A Return to Hogan's Alley --ABehrens (talk) 04:22, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

text: And here's another: VancouverTraces --ABehrens (talk) 04:49, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of name "Hogan's Alley"
Talk:Eduardo Noriega (Spanish actor)

message: There already exists a page on Eduardo Noriega at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eduardo_Noriega.
I suggest to merge the two articles and have a link from this site to the other one (and change the link on the page of the Mexican actor as well).
:Good catch; I'll handle it. Melchoir 02:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled