lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Greenville University

message: Since when has GC called itself GU?  When I enrolled about a year ago, it was GC, as on my ID card.  But the school's home-page no says GU.  Also,  GC has graduate programs, so it is more tha a 4-yr. school.
I don't recall signing a pledge  that I am Christ-honoring.  Is this maybe only for undergrads? 
````  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.247.32.64 (talk) 05:55, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  university / pledge 

message: A university Wikipedia page should have a section on academics, e.g., what degrees are conferred and what subjects or general subject areas are taught. Kdammers (talk) 13:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academics 

message: "Students are not required to sign a statement of faith; however, they must fulfill at least 36 chapel credits each semester. Most of these credits are fulfilled by attending a chapel service that is available on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday of every academic week at 9:30am."  This needs a citation and clarification.  Does it apply only to undergraduate on-campus FT students?  That is probably so, but the article does not say so.  In any case, it certainly did not apply to graduate online students in 2019. 04:00, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  chapel credits
Talk:Mick Green

message: Is it appropriate to use Wikipedia to publicise a concert, even if it’s in a good cause?AuntFlo (talk) 01:31, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's OK to mention the concert. It shouldn't be the first thing in the article. Therefore I made some edits to the text. --Vertigo Man-iac (talk) 21:10, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Concert details

message: I know this falls into the inadmissible 'I was there' category, but for what it's worth Green played "You Don't Own Me" with The Pirates at the Reading Festival in 1978 the day before the song's co-writer Alan Lancaster performed on the same stage as a member of Status Quo. JezGrove (talk) 22:55, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  You Don't Own Me
Talk:John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

message: When did the university change it's name to honor Pope John Paul II?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.94.1.17 (talk) 18:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change
Talk:Joliet Central High School

message: I am changing the assessment rating for the Schools project on this article, provisionally, from "Low" to "Mid".  While this article has a way to go, it seems to have a lengthy history, and a few notable alumni;  not to mention a building on the National Historic Register.  A more experienced editor should confirm this assessment. LonelyBeacon (talk) 06:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Double Exposure (comedy series)

message: In the longer term, this article should probably be split into separate articles for "Double Exposure (TV series)" and "Double Exposure (radio series)". However, at the present time, as long as the existing article discusses both the TV series and the radio series in a single article, its title has to stay at "comedy series", what with radio not being TV and all. Bearcat 00:41, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: How about "broadcast series"?  --JGGardiner 01:26, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: double exposure used the gremlins theme at the conclusion of each show    Peterparker3000 (talk) 14:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  double exposure ending theme 

message: This is a personal vanity website run by Ellen Kaye-Cheveldayoff. It cannot be considered a reliable source as it fails WP:SPS and WP:ELNO.—Ash (talk) 08:22, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Using strangeattractor.ca 
Talk:Palmolive Building

message: I think the discussion of the name should be cleaned up.  In the fifties and sixties, I knew it as the Palmolive Building. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdammers (talk • contribs)  11:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  name 

message: This article is just begging for a picture.  Isn't there a Wik editor in Chicago with a camera? Kdammers (talk) 02:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  picture, please 

message: Was it really called the "Palmolive Buildihg" (as it says in the article).
And was it called Palmolive first or Playboy first? (The article says "formerly called the Playboy Building" Al Hart (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name problems

message: The Lindbergh Beacon blurb needs rewrite and modern refs. I have placed dead link templates in the only ref cited and intend to rewrite pending comment. There is much available to make this a more factual article. Nickrz (talk) 18:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lindbergh Beacon
Talk:Peoria Marriott Pere Marquette

message: I've removed the following unsourced material.  If someone could find a source for the prohibition stuff, that would cool. 
:The Pere Marquette was the hotel with Liberace got his start in the entertainment business. In addition, famous Peorians Richard Pryor and Sam Kinison often stayed there. The presidential suite contains a false wall with a secret staircase and a secret hidden liquor cabinet used during prohibition.  Rklawton 13:13, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced
Talk:Boxcar Satan

message: Boxcar Satan should not be a redirect from Evil Mothers...they're distinct bands, and much of the association with Pigface is due to Curse Mackey (the vocalist of Evil Mothers and recognized member of Pigface, although that's not saying much), who appears to have nothing to do with Boxcar Satan. Evil Mothers is also self-referentially linked as an associated act.  Evil Mothers needs its own article. Tbessler (talk) 17:20, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not synonymous
Talk:Academy of Interactive Arts & Sciences

message: Currently there is a mixture of tables and lists which don't have a good appearance and could be improved nby standardizing on one or the other.  RJFJR (talk) 17:24, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need  to standardize on table or list
Talk:International Game Developers Association

message: While the IGDA is an organisation, there is a myriad of different chapters and groups that serve it. Would it be appropriate to create a list of chapters and/or groups that are part of the IGDA? KraigWalker (talk) 13:14, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be, but it's hard to keep them up to date. The IGDA has both academic and professional chapters, and the academic ones occasionally die if an institution stops teaching game development, or the instructor who founded it moves and no one takes it over. The IGDA maintains its own lists at http://www.igda.org/?page=chapters. Perhaps we should include a link to that instead? 80.7.12.136 (talk) 17:57, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: Create a list of active IGDA Chapters 
Talk:USS Mount Whitney

message: Does the ship have no history before 1981? Right now the Ship History section starts with "From 1981 to 2005,". The Ship's construction started in 1969. This site says it was launched exactly a year later, in 1970. According to this US Navy web site it was commissioned in 1971. What was its role between 1971 and 1981? Wefa (talk) 15:28, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Feel free to research that and help build the article. ;-)  - wolf 17:53, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  pre 1981? 

message: Listed beam is 108 feet- as wide as a Battleship - near the Panama Canal original Limits. I doubt the true beam is this large. Would any know actual beam at waterline - say midpoint from bow to stern? Overall width with the sponsons for boat davits - I can believe the 108 foot value there. But the true definition of Beam is at water lime - and I doubt it is that high. I'd believe 84 feet- the Austin Class LPD are listed as 84 feet beam at waterline and 105 feet extreme width. Wfoj3 (talk) 18:05, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Beam ? 

message: On 18 October 2023, Mount Whitney deployed from Gaeta with the Commander 6th fleet, Vice Adm. Thomas Ishee, and his staff, onboard "in support of U.S. operations" in the eastern Mediterranean Sea in waters off the 2023 Israel–Hamas war. This added to new deployments by the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69) aircraft carrier strike group and USS Bataan (LHD-5), USS Mesa Verde (LPD-19) and USS Carter Hall (LSD-50) carrying the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit, joining the USS Gerald R. Ford strike group. 96.60.168.239 (talk) 00:11, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add USS Mount Whitney to the 2023 Israel Hamas war article
Talk:Dempster–Skokie station

message: An image is needed for the historic station house. Lost on Belmont (talk) 09:22, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:GotFrag

message: I'm doing POV tag cleanup. Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it. This permits discussion and consensus among editors. This is a drive-by tag, which is discouraged in WP, and it shall be removed. Future tags should have discussion posted as to why the tag was placed, and how the topic might be improved. Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements. This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags. No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 18:49, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Tag 

message: I've rewritten the opening paragraph to try to achieve a more encylopaedic tone. I've alos introduced some references and red-linked a couple of the mentioned items. This is part of my effort to remove the  template at the top of the page. Usrnme h8er (talk) 15:43, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partial Clean-up, rewrite, re-tone 
Talk:John Robinson estate scandal

message: Probably can remove stub label now, but I don't know how.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jweaver28 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Washington Park (Springfield, Illinois)

message: It has been proposed below that Washington Park be renamed and moved to Washington Park (baseball) so that Washington Park (disambiguation) can be moved in its place.  Please discuss at Talk:Washington Park.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD)  15:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Nduell

message: User:Nduell
      run at Sun Jan 7 00:15:03 2007 GMT
Image:	1
Mainspace	18
Template:	1
User talk:	1
Wikipedia:	5
avg edits per article	4.33
earliest	04:38, 5 February 2006
number of unique articles	6
total	26
2006/2 	1 	
2006/3 	0 	
2006/4 	0 	
2006/5 	0 	
2006/6 	0 	
2006/7 	0 	
2006/8 	0 	
2006/9 	0 	
2006/10 	0 	
2006/11 	0 	
2006/12 	20 	
2007/1 	5 	
Nduell's editcount summary stats as of 00:15, January 7th 2006, using Interiot's wannabe Kate's tool. (aeropagitica) 00:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Cephalon

message: Made formatting changes and added some text worldoflifesciences  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.222.54.131 (talk) 01:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Isn't cephalon a biological term? Tummers 12:37, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  biology 

message: in 2001 - which had manufacturing plants of modafinil and adrafinil.--76.109.17.183 (talk) 03:32, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  aquired Group Lafon 

message: Controversies and business ethics of Cephalon, Inc
"The Federal Trade Commission today filed a complaint in federal district court against Cephalon, Inc., a pharmaceutical company based in Frazer, Pennsylvania, for a course of anticompetitive conduct that is preventing competition to its branded drug Provigil. The conduct includes paying four firms to refrain from selling generic versions of Provigil until 2012. Cephalon’s anticompetitive scheme, the FTC states, denies patients access to lower-cost, generic versions of Provigil and forces consumers and other purchasers to pay hundreds of millions of dollars a year more for Provigil."
http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2008/02/ceph.shtm  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.7.187 (talk) 11:20, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  FTC Sues Cephalon, Inc. for Unlawfully Blocking Sale of Lower-Cost Generic Versions of Branded Drug Until 2012 

message: Though likely valid, the following passage should probably not appear in the article without some substantiation, so that the notion of "main innovation" emerges from opinion leaders, not Wikipedia editors.
passage removed: "For now, the main innovation would seem to be the medical and commercial strategy that broadly educated physicians about health problems associated with severe sleepiness, and the clinical development and marketing approach that created the extraordinary modafinil product franchise."
--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:24, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing passage from Background -- unsubstantiated though likely valid 

message: Looking at the article traffic statistics:
* 30 March 2011, spiked to ~5x normal viewing frequency, with elevated viewing on the 31st
*: last 30 March version
* 3 January 2011, spiked to ~3x normal
*: version from 27 December
--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 17:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spikes in article viewing
Talk:Sparx Animation Studios

message: Merged Sparx_(company) to this page. Fleebo (talk) 02:53, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I cannot find any evidence anywhere on the internet that a Crash Bandicoot television series is in production or even pre-production, let alone that it would be produced by Sparx. I have added a citation needed tag to that entry on the list, but it won't be allowed to remain on the list for long if no one can cite a verified source for it. Shivers talk 19:10, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crash Bandicoot
Talk:Memorial Hall (Rockford, Illinois)

message: This article needs a bit of work. I think some inline citations with page numbers might help out, if the editor who has the book is still around and could help out, I can add them and mark where I think they should go using  as I did in the 100th anniversary section. I have some other notes below and this is all stuff I will try to work on.
I undertook some copy editing work (still needs some more) and a bit of a restructuring which I think is a bit more logical and flows a bit better. I also added a better image in the infobox but I do think that this article's info box should be converted to .
*The 100th anniversary section is unreferenced and makes some pretty outstanding claims that need specific references.
*The "Notes" section is really just a trivia section and it should be integrated into the body of the text in the appropriate section(s).
*This sentence: President Roosevelt became the only sitting president to dedicate a Memorial building still standing within the state of Illinois.
:*Doesn't make any sense, clarify.
::*Doesn't make any sense on first read, the second time around I see what your getting at but it's not very clear, how about: Memorial Hall is the only memorial building still standing in the state of Illinois that was dedicated by a sitting U.S. president. IvoShandor 14:33, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *I just did this. IvoShandor 14:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

text: The official name should be the name of the article, and we can just have a redirect from the current name. I also agree that Winnebago County War Memorial should also be listed in the begining (and have a redirect) and go with Memorial Hall throughout.--Kranar drogin 22:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up work

message: I removed the trivia section and edited material that was clearly dated. I also added the correct web link for the hall. I cannot find any evidence (on the web, Google or on rare book sites) that there is a book entitled "History of the Grand Army of the Republic" by Dyer. That may have something to do with the lack of specific page numbers. I am guessing the reference was a matter of vanity and/or marketing. 98.213.201.27 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 05:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits
Talk:Le Coq Sportif

message: The whole article reads like an advertisement. It should should be done in a neutral point of view.
Suggest reverting the article back to the previous version here, the major rewrite that was done is nothing but advertising and does not belong in an encyclopaedia. If there are no objections within a few days I'll go ahead with the revert. (Simon KHFC 01:24, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I fully agree. The current version is nothing but advertising puffery of the highest order. The current version flouts MoS and is NPOV. Revert it now, don't wait. The info was added by anon IP 81.80.12.81 and there are no prizes for guessing what comes up when you do a WHOIScheck on that IP. - X201 09:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite. Not NPOV

message: I know there's a lot of history over the management and licensing of the brand - I believe Adidas was a part owner for decades before a series of sales to various investors/licensees, though I don't have the specific dates etc. 204.63.44.147 (talk) 13:14, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs fleshing out 

message: I strongly believe that I had removed contentious material that is libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced from this Wiki page's sponsorship section. I had fixed misleading content; inadvertent or not. No legitimate or even any sources provided. Wisdomthroughfaith (talk) 09:04, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs actual sources 

message: The section under Sponsorships, "Current sponsorsphips" and "Football" "National teams" and "Club teams" must be properly referenced especially for teams like "South Africa," "Bnei Sakhnin," "Ironi Kiryat Shmona," "PAC Giannina," "Casarano", "AS Velasca" etc. 
These must be properly referenced. Again it is missing "references". Any uninvolved external editors would be highly appreciated to help handling this situation. :) Wisdomthroughfaith (talk) 20:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: If sources are needed, the correct template should have been "citations needed" or "unreferences" instead of "neutrality". I've just changed it. Fma12 (talk) 00:20, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Serious issue regarding WP:NPOV
Talk:Safran Helicopter Engines

message: Looking at the website, www.turbomeca.com now redirects to www.safran-helicopter-engines.com , and i can’t find any mention of “Torbomeca” on their site. So it looks like they more or less quietly renamed themselves and dropped “Turbomeca” as a name. ospalh (talk) 08:33, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Safran Helicopter Engines appears to be the name now being used in reliable sources. Given the long history of the name "Turbomeca", I think we should convert the article to cover it as a defunct company, and use the Safran page for current and upcoming information. The alternatives are to either move this page to Safran Helicopter Engines, or create a new article at that title. As an aside Finnemecanica disolved its historical divisions and is renaming the company Leonardo, and Airbus Group is becoming simply Airbus. These companies aren't making it easy to be Wikipedia editors! - BilCat (talk) 08:48, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I renamed it.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 06:11, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renamed to just Safran?
Talk:Lorraine-Dietrich

message: That part of France was part of Germany up until the end of WOI  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.134.94.21 (talk) 10:29, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  German empire 
Talk:Nathaniel de Rothschild

message: Is the image used in the lead really Nathaniel de Rothschild because it looks remarkably similar to that of his brother Mayer Amschel ? Giano   (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead image
Talk:Jacques Cœur

message: I don't believe that using French spelling for a name in English is really appropriate. As far as I know, "Coeur" more common in modern English literature.
Peter Isotalo 13:16, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  French spelling 
Talk:Woolaroc

message: This article has been greatly expanded and improved since it was first classified. It now meets the requirements for C classification. I have made this change for the Oklahoma project. Bruin2 (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The C classification mentioned above has been changed without explanation in the History. I have restored this classification after further expanding the text. Bruin2 (talk) 22:28, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article classification
Talk:James Mayer de Rothschild

message: James Mayer de Rothschild and James Edouard de Rothschild are not one and same person. Someone made a mistake and connected two seperate persons in one. Walter9 (talk) 14:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:   Misidentification 

message: His biography is interesting. I know that his death was not recent so we aren't confined by BLP. Could someone explain the difference between BLP and not when adding a main article or subheader "not enough " ? Sucker for All (talk) 02:05, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did Jomes Mayer Cause Problems?
Talk:Super Robot Wars: Original Generations

message: Dygenguard's Weapons in OG Gaiden
"Lastly, Famitsu scans have revealed the extra weapons of the Dygenguard, which were previously disabled by Sanger Zonvolt in favor of most of his Colossal Blade attacks, are now useable. It is not known why he would enable the weapons."
I'd just like to note that in the Alpha series, Sanger personally disabled the extra weapons on the Dygenguard. However, in the OG timeline it was stated that they didn't have enough time to reconfigure the OS in time for battle, and focused entirely on sword combat. Shouldn't this text be altered? CyborgZeta 18:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, it's accurate.  You're remembering the OG events a little wrong.  In OG, the DGG malfunctioned immediately after it was activated.  Its integrated weapons never worked.  Wodan tossed Sanger the blade from his Type 3 to give him something to use.  After the battle, Sanger decided to disable the DGG's integrated weapons and stick with just the blade.  He didn't want to waste time waiting on the weapons to get fixed, especially since he preferred the blade anyhow.  Irm's dad then optimized its OS for sword combat.
Yeah, I definitely got things wrong. Thanks for the clarification. CyborgZeta 02:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Just like Alpha Gaiden has it's own. It will just become crammed, within time, since this is an entirely new title, which will have it's own page worth of info to be put up on the wiki. (Shin Kairi (talk) 22:45, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OG Gaiden needs its own page.
Talk:Édouard Alphonse James de Rothschild

message: ...bearing in mind: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edict_of_Expulsion  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:411:1600:226:8FF:FEDC:FD74 (talk) 23:00, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why was he named: Édouard?
Talk:Paul Rosenberg (art dealer)

message: I think the "references" linking to "articles" about the recent DSK affair are completely out of scope, as proof/source/reference for the link between his wife and P.Rosenberg, it's not appropriate to use an article about some (purported) sex scandal where Rosenberg's name is mentioned completely marginally, only once at the end of the single phrase that speaks about A.Sinclair. — MFH:Talk 12:41, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  DSK links 

message: Indeed many additions and changes are required, beginning with the elimination of references to events in the life of Paul Rosenberg's grand-daughter that took place over half a century after his death. Ponteuxen (talk) 00:33, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to this article. 