lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Constantine IV

message: When clicked on the caption say the far left figure is Justinian II, I would not say that is true unless it can be absolutely proved. And Heraclius and Tiberius, is which one is which proved? The wording on the actual mosaic gives the impression Heraclius is second figure from the left after "justinian", but it might be that the oldest is nearer the father, the opposite to the wording on the mosaic?
Also, the wording on the mosaic is said to have been added at a later date, possibly mistakenly made to look period but incorrectly? They have used V in Constantinvs, but with a coin of his great grandfather emperor Heraclius we can see the V is well evolved into being a U, https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FnCcefcXoAAwwxc?format=jpg&name=900x900
Middle More Rider (talk) 15:55, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mosaic picture
Talk:Abdul Razzak Yaqoob

message: How you done this that Muhammad Iqbal is your brother, This is not real. Please cancel otherwise all will ne confused that Abdul Razzak Yaqoob was born in 1944 where as Muhammad Iqbal in 1877. :( Daniyalas (talk) 11:55, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  how you done this...
Talk:Westminster Schools of Augusta

message: more required Victuallers 17:15, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: more

message: Surely you matriculate 'at', or 'to'; but not 'from'. Is 'graduate' what is meant? Snori (talk) 23:18, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: "matriculated from"
Talk:Associate in Music, Australia

message: I've wikified and categorized this, but I'm still not sure I completely understand, probably because I don't know much about the Australian educational system.  Is this something you get just by taking an exam (which is the impression I get), or is it given as part of/at the end of some course of schoolwork?  I think it would help the article a lot if someone out there who knows more about this could make it a little clearer to non-Australian readers.  Pinball22 17:16, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why I added the "confusing" tag

message: I have to disagree about the article itself. As an Australian but not a musician, my view is that the article explains the subject very well.
It is not the job of the article to explain the structure of the arts education system in Australian.
I proposed to remove the "confusing" tag in approx 1 week unless further discussion occurs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesman123 (talk • contribs) 08:26, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggest that the "confusing" tag should be removed

message: The "prestigious award, equivalent to achieving an undergraduate tertiary qualification in Music" is a bit strong. I hold an AMusA diploma and while it is a useful measure of one's ability in things like instrumental performance, I do not believe it is anything like as valued as a degree in music. These days heaps of kids complete it while still in high school. JimBreen (talk) 01:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Bit Over The Top
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Musical Instruments/Templates

message: Just an attempt to ascertain which colors are most popular (read:CONSENSUS!) for infoboxes and such.
Khaki	MistyRose	Thistle	LightSalmon	LightPink	LightGreen	BurlyWood	LightSkyBlue	OrangeRed	DarkRed
What color do you prefer?  Let us know below!  - NDCompuGeek 18:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A: What I'm trying to ascertain is the preferential primary color of any infobox, the border color, and the titlebar color.  I figure if I just ask for your 3 favorite colors, I can adjust the boxes to work.  - NDCompuGeek 16:36, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I prefer colors that are as low-key as possible--khaki, mistyrose, and thistle are my top 3. Infoboxes shouldn't be hard on the eyes, or attract undue attention. --Fang Aili talk 16:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template colors
Talk:Heritage coast

message: Having fleshed out the article with tabulated lists, it might be time to compose articles on some of the coasts themselves. cheers Geopersona (talk) 07:16, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is the line after Purbeck a duplication, or is there a missing coast name? BobKilcoyne (talk) 05:06, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dorset
Talk:Marine nature reserve

message: Should this page be moved to Marine Conservation Zone as MNRs seem to be called this now? I also see Skomer MCZ is in the news today here. I was just passing. Cheers... Tony Holkham (talk) 22:37, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say not - marine nature reserves and marine conservation zones aren't the same designation, and the existing UK MNRs aren't automatically converted to MCZs. Mauls (talk) 15:28, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  MCZ 
Talk:National nature reserve (United Kingdom)

message: I notice that this series of articles/stubs/disambig pages all have tags on them and that there seem to be a lot of links. The most peculiar thing about these links is that when you start to follow them down to try to find out something concrete about all these designations and organizations you get no further ahead than when you started!
I thought, well let me confine myself to the United States, where I live. Maybe then I will understand who is making these designations and what they mean and what authority they have and what organizations public or private are involved, but no dice. This series of articles seems to have created a total fantasy world, or rather, the Wikipedia network reflects a general Internet fantasy network. Nearly every one has tags asking who, what, when, why, where.
Now, the overall impression I get from the whole network is that all the words are based ultimately on changes to the British corpus of law, which requires this and that and offers something else to qualified organizations. That is about all the clarity I get. What we need here is someone to say, according to sections x, y, z of the blah blah blah act, the British government establishes or offers the opportunity to establish organizations to do thus and so and here is the authority granted to them, and the following organizations perform these functions and they do blah blah blah and are located at blah blah blah and publish the following periodicals, which are available at blah blah blah. Until someone can do that we are just not going to know what the heck is going on.
Someone with some expertise and a modicum of ability to express himself/herself in concrete English needs to take this in hand.Dave 20:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestion
Talk:Adda of Bernicia

message: There seems to be a general problem in many sources of associating King Adda with the Battle of Caer Greu.
Adda's death is regularly given as 568 and the battle in 580. Obviously, one or other is wrong.
Given that after Caer Greu the Deirans under Ælle rose up, it is a reasonable guess that he may be the one who defeated Peredur and Gwrgi (twin brothers ruling Ebrauc). My personal notes have Ælle as the victor, but I can no longer recall my source for that.
Most sources (including Wikipedia) have Frithuwald on the Bernician throne in 580.
I would be interested to hear where the origin of Adda's involvement stems from. Perhaps an old Welsh Triad?
Karl Craig 13:12, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who was the real Anglian king at the battle of Caer Greu? 

message: Much mention of "sources" here, none of which is identified. Most of the early sources will have Wikipedia articles. --Wetman (talk) 07:25, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: "Sources"
Talk:National scenic area

message: NSAs also exist in Taiwan. --JensMueller (talk) 23:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: See National scenic areas in Taiwan. Taiwantaffy (talk) 06:27, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

text: I have added NSA for Taiwan. Chongkian (talk) 00:12, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taiwan 

message: I'd suggest this page might usefully be replaced with a simple redirect to National Scenic Area, which is a disambiguation page for the use of this name in a number of different countries.  There's no real similarity between the different NSAs other than the shared name. Grinner (talk) 15:54, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I history-merged the former disambiguation page. This is a WP:Broad-concept article. We can have that, or a simple disambiguation, but, unless there is a National Scenic Area (album) or National Scenic Area (film), or some other article of that sort, we shouldn't have both a broad-concept article and a disambiguation. – wbm1058 (talk) 23:34, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Fine, I'm very happy with the way you've dealt with it. Grinner (talk) 18:29, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Make this a redirect
Talk:Judith Mason

message: moved unsourced CV laundry list off main space WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 20:37, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: moved unsourced CV laundry list off main space

message: moved unsourced material on "philosophy" off main space. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 20:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  moved unsourced material on "philosophy" off main space 

message: Visual Arts
Creative Arts Wookbook 41.150.33.208 (talk) 09:26, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creative Arts
Talk:Latin American Idol

message: Does this show cover all of the Western Hemisphere south of the US (minus Brazil) or just the Spanish-speaking countries? (in terms of eligible contestants) CrazyC83 17:28, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Extent of the show
Talk:Fetal Position (House)

message: Much better format than previous episodes.  All the articles in this series should have minimal "sections," as there should only be one or two notes sections, not one each for "arc advancement" and "referbacks" (what is that anyways). Mooshimanx 17:29, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Referbacks are references to previous episodes.  The actual format of multiple sections isn't uncommon --206.75.46.254 18:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The above comment was made by me: --Forgottenlord 18:46, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In the actual event "The baby was anesthetized. The baby was not aware of what was going on.". That was Dr. Burner's statement who was the surgeon of the operation. Later he said that he moved the baby's hand, not the baby grabbed his hand. I don't know if the fetus was anesthetized in this scene, if yes, it's movement should be noted as an unrealistic portrayal or whatever the lingo expression is for this.     —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kangaxx (talk • contribs) 23:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

text: I have removed the quotes section and added to  the Wikiquote article as per WP:NOT#DIRECTORY.  GeorgeC 15:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

text: I just rewatched the ending but could not find any indication that the baby was named Greg. BlueJaeger (talk) 22:52, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Same here. I removed the reference. --Brokshen (talk) 14:30, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of rivers of Wisconsin

message: As I mentioned on Talk:Wolf River (Wisconsin), there is at least one other Wolf River in Wisconsin, a tributary of the North Fork Eau Claire River (that is, the Chippewa River tributary Eau Claire River).  I'd fix this up, but I'm not sure what to do exactly...  Should Wolf River (Wisconsin) be moved to Wolf River (Fox River (Wisconsin)) and the other article be named [eventually] Wolf River (Eau Claire River (Chippewa River)) or what?!  Tomer TALK 22:18, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  problem with the [[Wolf River (Wisconsin)]] 

message: My idea is to have County Level lists of rivers and streams, which allows for adequate description and imagery for each. I do not believe that every little river and  stream deserves its own article (however the big ones such as Baraboo River and Wisconsin River definitely do!). If you have any concerns with this idea, please state them here or on my talk page. Thanks. JackFromReedsburg (talk) 00:54, 8 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal: Potentially having County level lists of rivers and streams
Talk:Ford Motor Company Assembly Plant

message: To be added?
The building was shown on the DVD box for the movie "Tucker". Scenes of the movie were also filmed here.
Bio-Rad Laboratories occupied the building up until the 1989 earthquake.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.101.136.224 (talk) 16:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Not citable but good outline of where article might go:  http://westerntrips.blogspot.com/2012/09/historic-richmond-california-ford-plant.html
* http://www.craneway.com/Press/Details/li/CranewayPavilion-NewRichmondFerrySite
*http://www.craneway.com/Press/Details/li/RosietheRiveterVisitors%E2%80%99CenterGrandOpening
*http://www.craneway.com/Press/Details/li/Richmondsrestoredartscenteroffersinspiration
*http://www.archinnovations.com/featured-projects/mixed-use/marcy-wong-donn-logan-architects-ford-assembly-building-richmond-california/
*http://www.metrojacksonville.com/article/2010-mar-ford-assembly-plant-comes-back-to-life
* http://archrecord.construction.com/projects/bts/archives/adaptivereuse/10_The_Ford_Assembly_Building/default.asp
-- John Broughton   (♫♫) 18:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for future improvement
Talk:List of rivers of West Virginia

message: FYI--further research needed... There are various tributory streams in WV named Buffalo Creek, as is mentioned in this history. One is definitely a tributory of the Monongahela river forming the valley in which Mannington, West Virginia is located, and thus certainly not covered by the [[Buffalo Creek (South Branch Potomac River)|Buffalo Creek (Potomac)] link on this list page. Neither would, iirc, the geography of Logan County in southern WV lead one to think the Buffalo Creek mentioned in this strip mining caused disaster be a tributary of the Potomac, though it's conceivably possible if the ridgelines work out correctly. // FrankB 06:26, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Buffalo Creek @[[Fairmont, West Virginia|Fairmont]]
Talk:List of rivers of Washington (state)

message: Looking at the list, there are no entries for rivers and creeks in the eastern Kitsap Peninsula, that drain into Puget Sound. Cebuano Wikipedia lists one here. 
Could someone add these? Spaceexplorerer ᐵ (talk) 19:13, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kitsap Peninsula?
Talk:National Library of Turkey

message: Funny, I thought I had seen an article about the same topic but with its English name. But maybe I am thinking of something else. Anyways, if it is discovered in the future they can be merged.. Baristarim 11:56, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Richmond Spiders

message: This page can use a great deal of expansion on the different programs, facilities, and history.  Several of the current entries also need some major editing.  But this should serve as a good starting point. WildCowboy 17:40, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible article expansion

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 19:51, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the heads-up...I had no idea it had been copied from elsewhere.  I've rewritten the content in a non-infringing manner and included a reference to the university's official athletics site with information on the history behind the name. WildCowboy (talk) 20:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:List of rivers of Texas

message: Cedar Bayou
There are apparently at least two "Cedar Bayou"s. The one on the river page located between the Trinity and San Jacinto Rivers is relatively short, its source north of I-10 between Mont Belvieu and Barrett Station then emptying into Trinity Bay.  That link, however directs to the other which is a channel linking Mesquite Bay with the Gulf between Matagorda Island and San Jose Island.  It could be argued that neither is a river or creek, but the Trinity Bay one is a legitimate Bayou where my family water skied in the '50s. Jbk9255152 (talk) 06:40, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

message: I really think that you should actually SHOW us the map of Texas. I would have helped me o my assignment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!   Trying to be helpful, Karena Taylor —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.1.219.60 (talk • contribs) 
Karena, if you can find a map, please add it. Ziroby 15:58, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dear wikipedia

message: Several of the "rivers" on this list are actually named creek, and many are fairly small time affairs.  I've removed the following from the list:
* Brady River - Brady Creek?
* Denton River - Denton Creek (really small creek)?
* Hondo River - currently linked to Rio Hondo in California/PR.  Meant Hondo Creek?
Kuru talk 22:19, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Creek/River

message: List/Mid Bhaktivinode 05:51, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Texas

message: I don't really find enough compelling reasons for existence of this list as a separate article. It can be well contained in the page here only List_of_Texas_rivers.Tekxtinct (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Can you say this in a different way; your sentence did not make sense? Kuru (talk) 02:16, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

text: Sorry for mine being unclear on this. I was suggesting that since this article only categorizes the Rivers of Texas into a special set, there isn't a reason compelling enough to list it as a separate article. This can also be listed in the main article under a new heading.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivek Rai (talk • contribs) 08:18, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: What is the main article in this case?  There is no article at Rivers of Texas; it redirects here. Kuru (talk) 11:42, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  The main article I'm referring to is List of rivers of Texas. Vivek Rai (talk) 13:34, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: There is a Spring Creek listed under Seasonal and restrictive waterways.  There are at least three different Spring Creeks in Texas.  Two of them are listed under their respective drainage basins.   I don't know which one is the seasonal one.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MB (talk • contribs) 05:08, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spring Creek
Talk:Long-billed thrasher

message: The lead image named :File:Long-billed Thrasher, Toxostoma longirostre; South TX on cactus 01.jpg is currently being discussed at the discussion page of the Birds WikiProject. Feel free to join the discussion on whether the image is a long-billed thrasher or not. Pandakekok9 (talk) 02:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I've replaced the lead photo, as it had been misidentified. The replaced photo was of a curve-billed thrasher, not a long-billed. Long-billed thrashers don't have pale tail tips (their tail is all rufous) and are very rufous on the back — like a brown thrasher. There's a distinct difference between the color of the face, and the color of the crown and back. Long-billed also has a bold black moustachial stripe, which isn't as strong on the curve-billed. MeegsC (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image of this article
Talk:Saddle Mountain (Clatsop County, Oregon)

message: Photograph request - The article's infobox could use an image of the full mountain. The Infobox mountain template mentions "Preferably a distance shot to show most/all of the mountain rather than a view from the summit."  The current image and all images in commons do not have this view, only summits or very distant shots.  Thank you. — 71.236.191.197 (talk) 03:43, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

message: According to a local publication I read many decades ago, the local Atfalati called Saddle Mountain a name similar to "Tualatin", meaning twin peaks, from whence came the name of the river. Of course, Tualatin River has a different derivation for the origin of the name, but not based on an academic source.
I'm wondering if my memory is actually correct. Melville Jacobs published a volume that preserves what we still have of the Kalapuya language, & it contains the older names of many landmarks; I wonder if that might provide a definite answer. -- llywrch (talk) 17:36, 6 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native American name
Template talk:Star formation

message: I reverted the template to the uncollapsed form from this version, where the navigation template subsections are all visible. They were changed to appear collapsed, which I didn't like as it reduced ease of navigation. See Template talk:PhysicsNavigation#The collapsed subsections look terrible) where I asked for a collapsed=show parameter. (also this talk page did not align fully left for some reason so I wrapped the above in a div) -Wikianon (talk) 22:10, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, this was my fault. I didn't notice your comment. I'll fixely the PhysNav. template so it wholly uncollapses when desired. (Sheliak (talk) 06:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I reverted to uncollapsed

message: I just reorganized the list here... if anyone objects, please discuss here.  Just a few thoughts I had on possibly tweaking it some more....
* The "objects" list seems to perhaps better correspond to "stages of star formation."
* The nebular hypothesis seems to have a lot of overlap with the star formation article, so I don't know if we should separate it out.  
* The interstellar medium isn't a single object, per se, so it's a bit of an oddball....but would make sense as a "stage of star formation"
Discuss! Sailsbystars (talk) 19:39, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorg
Talk:Q3 Academy Great Barr

message: Refs needed Some alumni ... well done ..refs? Pics would be good. Victuallers 09:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess

message: I have reverted edits of Deagol2 as per WP:V. They can re-add the material only if they provide a reliable source.-Kishfan (talk) 16:06, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted some information that was not supported by a reference and appeared to be a fragment of a sentence left over from an earlier edit, so you have actually added unsourced material to the article with your edit. Not looking for conflict, so will leave it up to you. Deagol2 (talk) 17:46, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing un-sourced material