lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:In the Pink (Donna Lewis album)

message: Ok, so this magical album is due for, what, 6 years now? Perhaps we should delete this page, and add the interesting information (about the leaked song, etc.) to the main Donna Lewis page. Jalwikip 12:48, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the first single, "Shout", was released in the UK today (yay!), so it might be appropriate to keep this article separate from the main Donna Lewis one. Extraordinary Machine 14:36, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove page? 

message: This article is a randomly selected subject of my attempt to guage the evolving quality of Wikipedia. I will occasionally select 10 article at random (using the "Random article" feature, of course) and grade each of them using the Wikipedia:Good Article standard below:
What is a good article?
A good article has the following attributes.
1. It is well written. 
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. 
3. It is broad in its coverage, addressing all major aspects of the topic (this requirement is slightly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FAC, and allows shorter articles and broad overviews of large topics to be listed);.
4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
5. It is stable, i.e.,  it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars.
6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic. 
===May 21, 2008===
# In the Pink (album)
#*Well written? - FAILED - Out of date. Needs stylistic clean-up to be fully understandable by non-fans. 
#*Factually accurate? - FAILED - Cites biased/unreliable sources.
#*Broad in its coverage? - FAILED.
#*NPOV - Yes.
#*Is it stable? - FAILED.
#*Images - Yes.
- Davodd (talk) 18:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Random Evaluation

message: # In the Pink (album)
#*Well written? - FAILED - Out of date. Needs stylistic clean-up to be fully understandable by non-fans. 
#*Factually accurate? - FAILED - Cites biased/unreliable sources.
#*Broad in its coverage? - FAILED.
#*NPOV - Yes.
#*Is it stable? - FAILED.
#*Images - Yes.
- Davodd (talk) 18:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[May 21]], 2008
Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 39

message: I pulled the following text from a disambiguation page. If someone can source this, feel free to add it to the article.
*"Hush puppy", nickname for a silenced modification of the Smith & Wesson Model 39, developed during the Vietnam War for use by United States Navy SEALs and designated Mark 22, Mod. O. So named for its intended function of killing enemy watch dogs.
-Freekee (talk) 05:13, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hush puppy 

message: A recent edit to the article makes it sound like the Model 39 series and 9x19mm cartridge were short-lived in ISP service.  Actually, the 39-series (39, 39-2, and 439) were issued for roughly 20 years.  When they were dropped in 1988, it was for the recently introduced 3rd Generation S&W 5904, another 9x19mm model.  These serviced on for roughly another decade until replaced by the Glock 22 in .40 S&W.   --D.E. Watters (talk) 02:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Illinios State Police service
Talk:Tanfoglio Force

message: Came across this via Wikification drive.Went ahead and merged this with TZ-75 as suggested, seeing as the articles reference the same firearm. --Sesameball 07:52, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: This article is ugly.  IMO, it needs a rewrite.  Added tag.  —Thernlund (Talk | Contribs) 07:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Just finished a rewrite. The guidelines for merging recommend saving the full content of both pages so it's included in the history. As I noted, a subject-knowledgeable editor should probably review the new format and template to follow any standards from the Firearms wikiproject, since I'm not familiar with them - so I left the tag up. --Sesameball 08:01, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You did pretty good.  I was sort of quick on the trigger with the tag.  I removed it.  —Thernlund (Talk | Contribs) 08:11, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Colt Commander

message: I removed the Statistics section, which contained specs such chambering, size, weight and finish for various models, as it was entirely unsourced. Preserving here: diff –dlthewave ☎ 22:38, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced content
Talk:Colt Delta Elite

message: Good article. It would be nice to have a more generic picture, though.  That gun is not really showing what a typical Delta Elite looks like.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.109.41.17 (talk) 19:56, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Need generic picture

message: What year did Colt intro the Delta?  Trekphiler (talk) 04:18, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Gettin' a date
Talk:FN Model 1910

message: This page says that the specific serial number of the gun used to kill Franz Ferdinand was unknown, but the actual page on the assassination states that it was serial #19074.  Just thought I would point out the discrepancy. 99.235.254.183 (talk) 15:28, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Serial number

message: The article on the assassination indicates the weapon used was chambered in .380 ACP, but this article states the .32 ACP.  Which is correct? --Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 21:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The sources I could find say .32 ACP - I don't have access to the source used on the other article. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the reply.  I've always read .32 ACP too.  I found the book cited (The Assassination Business, ) on the Archduke article on Amazon.  A quick search inside produced three hits on 'Browning.'  Only one of which says '9mm' (presumably the author meant 9x17mm).  A search on '.380' produced one hit and it was a total unrelated event in contemporary times.  So, I am inclined to think this article is correct and the other needs updating.  Thoughts? --Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 23:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I did a bunch of research and the best I could understand was the .32. I think that there are some who believe that somehow newer information exists that it's the .380 but I couldn't substantiate it. I'd prefer that all match and be sourced properly. If we get new sources that override this info, then we could fix it all at the point. Go with the WP:RS is my vote. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 00:53, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I provided a reference to a book I own.  I'll quote here: "Fifty years earlier, two 9mm bullets from a browning pistol, serial number 19074, were enough to open up the vast subterranean crevasses concealed under the highly polished veneer of European Civilization." He has a source.  Further, [] constitutes original research, however fully corroborates the reference.  The confusion has been poorly researched works in the past.  Browning's biography by Gentry states it was a M1900.  All of the sources that state it's a .32 were derivative.  Given the above original research and the reference I provided, I think it's highly unlikely it was a .32 caliber. --Winged Brick (talk) 14:41, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archduke Franz Ferdinand assassination?
Talk:Nano Rivas

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved   (t · c) buidhe 18:07, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Nano (footballer, born 1980) →  – Several pages list him with his last name, so per WP:NCP and WP:NATURALDIS using his last name would better disambiguate the page. Sources already on page: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Ortizesp (talk) 06:27, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 14:12, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 5 December 2020 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) EggRoll97 (talk)  22:06, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Nano Rivas →  – Reverting previous move, not WP:NATURAL and correct WP:COMMONNAME. BRDude70 (talk) 20:40, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 11 August 2023
Talk:MCM pistol

message: The Margolin comes also in 22 short which was what the Russians used in Olympic Rapid Fire events. 
See: http://forums.gunboards.com/showthread.php?t=68895 and http://www.targettalk.org/viewtopic.php?p=88988
 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.185.188.18 (talk) 11:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not just 22LR 

message: The russian abbreviation МЦМ translates into MTsM, where comes the"C" from? Markscheider (talk) 09:44, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why MCM?
Talk:QSZ-92

message: I know it may be entirely incidental and not really important, but the handgun looks incredibly similar in its design to PYa Grach (MP443), and uses freely rotating barrel locking, like PYa's competitor GSh-18. And it was developed simultaneously with these pistols (trial started 1993, QSZ "began development" in 1994).
I may be wrong, but knowing Chinese inclination to not invent something that's already there, it looks like a case of industrial espionage (especially considering the ease that gov. secrets could be obtained in Russia in early 90s).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.195.41.202 (talk) 15:15, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The second source in the article http://pewpewpew.work/china/handgun/qsz92/qsz92.htm (note: in Chinese), actually has a very detailed record on the development process of the pistol. Type 92 started development in 1987 and in 1994 it has five different prototypes with four different types of firing mechanism. Ignoring your prejudice and bias, the external and internal design of MP443 and QSZ-92 is apparently different if you look at the actual locking mechanism. You can check QSZ-92's mechanism at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzvcyXmlZxQ. ----Loned (talk) 22:43, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Taurus PT24/7

message: Is it really necessary to list every single model variation?  It certainly doesn't seem helpful or useful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.108.208.207 (talk) 03:52, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The current version of the Design features section runs through the various features like they are from a trade brochure, mostly citing the Taurus website.  It strikes me that this is not terribly encyclopedic, and the fact that the gun was recalled due to firing when dropped seems to undermine the strength of the heavy emphasis on features which prevent misfiring when dropped.  --TeaDrinker (talk) 01:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Design features reads like a promotional ad 

message: There was information in the article about 90,000 PT 24/7 handguns being recalled, with a link leading to The Firearm Blog. Someone replaced this with very unprofessionally typed claims that the info was false and didn't provide any links, so I removed it. Could someone more knowledgeable with sources find out if this information is accurate?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grimwol (talk • contribs) 16:25, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  2013 recall info 

message: The current title, "Taurus PT 24/7", with a space, is incorrect, despite being commonly used in secondary sources. However, Taurus' website identifies it as both "PT24/7" and "24/7". I believe "PT24/7" is the more correct of the two, but thought it better to ask.
Also, is there any good reason for the Taurus PT24/7 G2 Pistol page? Because I'm sure all the info can be covered here. Thanks. RadiculousJ (talk) 18:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Taurus PT24/7 or Taurus 24/7

message: Looking at the webpages, it appears this firearm has been discontinued. Anyone willing to confirm this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.167.55.127 (talk) 00:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Companies often announce new products, but they're less likely to announce the discontinuation of old ones. Unlike most companies, Taurus has a list of discontinued items. So I added that info. Thanks for pointing it out. Felsic2 (talk) 00:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discontinuation
Talk:Asumi Nakada

message: In cleaning up her voice roles section, I've taken out quite a few roles that I couldn't find any sources for, including the entirety of the dubbing category - I'm not sure what happened there, but none of the items previously listed there appear to have anything at all to do with this actress. If I'm in error, please do re-add them. I've also taken off the Saint Seiya credit, as that role appears to have been played by a different actress. Pika pika pink (talk) 06:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  dub section clean-up 
Talk:Kei Tomiyama

message: Can one of our Japanese speaking friends translate Tomiyama's cause of death? Philosopher2king (talk) 22:51, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of Death? 

message: The article had a quote, , in it. I can find no references to this moniker being applied to him, so I have removed it. If we can find a reference for this, we can replace it. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mel Blanc moniker
Talk:AMT AutoMag III

message: Perhaps a reference to the failed Kimball pistol would be of interest. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 17:57, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kimball 
Talk:Stechkin automatic pistol

message: Here should be disambigue for Stechkin since there was at least Sergey Borisovich Stechkin (a cousin of Stechkin APS inventor)Mir76 (talk) 16:58, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. I created a dab. Someone not using his real name (talk) 05:50, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think adding a few lines regarding other users may be of interest.  They turned up in Cuba and a number of other Soviet client states.  The Jane's Guide may be a good source. 66.191.19.68 (talk) 22:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other users?
Talk:Borchardt C-93

message: There was a sentence that read: "Only 3,200 Borchardt pistols had been produced, yet only 1,100 pistols were made by the Ludwig and Loewe Companie" (sic).  I'm not able to figure out what this is trying to say; anyone know anything about this 3200 pistols number?97.123.129.23 (talk) 04:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange Sentence? 

message: "…based upon the Maxim toggle-lock principle."
I'm not finding any occurrence of "toggle" in Maxim gun (what "Maxim" links to), nor of "maxim" in Blowback (arms) (what the "toggle-lock" link points to). So i suspect that there's a problem here. --Jerome Potts (talk) 14:39, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "toggle-lock" mechanism 

message: So, this gun appears in RDR. Should there be some kind of note about that?  213.185.45.116 (talk) 18:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Dead Redemption appearance. 
Talk:Rubén Orihuela

message: has any announcement been made that Mr. Orihuela is trans? if not, he should be put in the categories for men, not women. 2603:6010:A5F0:8970:90DF:2D53:FFC4:A2A3 (talk) 06:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  catigories
Talk:FEG AP9

message: Edited this page, to correct factual and technical errors. Don't know who wrote this article, but he/she definitaly shouldn't write firearms related articles, it was so full of errors.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.1.169.63 (talk) 20:04, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Special Forces Regiment (Philippines)

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s).  Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:26, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Lake Evella Airport

message: In 2004 the airstrip was sealed.  
What exactly does this mean?  To my ears, it sounds like the government won't let anyone use it. 76.106.149.108 (talk) 17:15, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sealed? 
Talk:Ai Uchikawa

message: Well, I do not see why this article should be speedily deleted... Uchikawa worked on several popular anime series (Cowboy Bebop, Crest of the Stars, Mazinkaiser) and there are external sources containing info about her. I'd like to hear more argumentation in favor of the deletion before we do anything rash. %) --Koveras ☭ 05:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Were they major roles, not just minor or secondary ones? Are there sources and significant coverage about this person? Can this article be anything more than a copy of her ANN listing? We can do an AfD if you want, though there are already three others there in similar shape. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:07, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, ANN lists her role in Mazinkaiser as major... As for coverage, I think more info can be found if an editor or two put some work into this article... --Koveras ☭ 05:12, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As the speedy was declined, I've tagged for notability and lack of sources to give a few days for someone to work on it before sending it to AfD if the issues aren't met. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 16:41, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Gee, I somehow get a feeling you have something against Uchikawa. %) --Koveras ☭ 20:08, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Not at all, don't know him. I just don't like seeing Wikipedia flooded with a bunch of voice actor articles that are little more than copies of their ANN listings. If there are no sources discussing these folks, they shouldn't have articles, irregardless of whether we anime fans think they are notable or important because of the roles they have played. In reality, most don't even get that much coverage in Japan because they just aren't notable. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 20:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hangon
Talk:Bucharest Bărăția

message: "Bucharest Bărăţia" seems a very odd title. Why not just Bărăţia Church, which I see is not even a redirect at the moment? - Jmabel | Talk 07:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are more churches in Romania named Bărăţia and all of them are pretty old and noteworthy. bogdan 09:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Actually, now that I know more about the history of Catholicism in Bulgaria, the mid-17th century was the only time it could have been built by Bulgarians: Chiprovtsi was in its heyday in 1666 and many local merchants traded in the Romanian lands. By that date, most Franciscans in Bulgaria were locals. Of course, I don't have any sources so I'll just readd Province of Bulgaria. Todor→Bozhinov 15:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 
Talk:Seventeenth Summer

message: Really?  The novel was published in 1942 and 17-year-olds would have been considered virtually adults at that time and old enough to drink and smoke.  If somebody doesn't have a citation to a source expressing some concern for the "underage drinking and smoking", this is just silly. TheBlinkster (talk) 13:46, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Also it shows underage drinking and smoking." 

message: I think I've addressed most of the issues mentioned in the flag.  If somebody else agrees, feel free to remove it. Bookgrrl holler/lookee here 15:17, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues addressed?
Talk:Walther TPH

message: The Walther TP Models .22 L.R. (5.6mm) and .25 ACP (6.35mm) have shrouded hammers.
WoodenBooks 20:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

message: "These criticisms are in a sense relative. US made TPH handguns are still average or better quality handguns, and German made models and the best of the American models are highly reliable and smooth operating weapons."
As written, this middle section of the 'Controversy and issues' section is taking an opinionated stance and representing it as fact with regards to the quality of U.S.-made examples of the subject of this article. No evidence, proof or even source is provided to substantiate the claims made within this passage. Monoblocks (talk) 06:35, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: This is opinion, not fact
Talk:Maureen Daly

message: This article needs a citations and a reference section. — Emiellaiendiay 07:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations

message: I added quite a bit to this article, as this woman did a lot more than just write Seventeenth Summer.  She had a very long journalism career, and wrote lots of other books. 
There are cites for everything I added, but they will take time to add since I am already working on cleaning up/ adding cites to at least one other article. Please bear with me while I add the cites. Thank you. TheBlinkster (talk) 18:25, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additions
Talk:Pocket pistol

message: As can be demonstrated by my bold move, I wouldn't think that there would be any objection whatsoever.  If there were an article called "Gat" that described a readilly available, stolen pistol, I would want it redirected to handgun. The funny thing here is that the term "Mousegun" is not in the dictionary, but "Gat" is. If anything, it needs to be on a list of slang terms used to describe handguns... if there.  --Winged Brick (talk) 12:52, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Mousegun is a common term.  We have more flexibility to incorporate newer language than is possible in static, dated dictionaries.  "Mousegun" and "pocket pistol" are also different manifestations of small handguns, and, in the case of Mousegun, this term of "Mousegun" also has usage in describing rifles firing bullets smaller than .30 caliber (e.g., an M16).  The two articles really address different topics and should not be merged.  There is value in keeping the two articles distinct.  Yaf (talk) 21:44, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger from [[Mousegun]]

message: Based on reading this article, it appears that "pocket pistol" is one author's term for any small gun. If so, it's hardly worth having an article. Maybe an entry in Glossary of firearms terms would suffice. Unless more sources can be found to show that this term has common usage, etc, I'll redirect it to that list. Rezin (talk) 00:34, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability and single source 

message: Pistoles historically came in 4 sizes; pocket, belt, overcoat, and horse. I don't have a source off the top of my head but I could find one if necessary. J8079s (talk) 16:22, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 