lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Seventh grade

message: this is all wrong!
It fails to mention so many aspects of what 7th grade is all about. My students just finished argumentative essays, they are creating Instagrams to show character development, and they are always incorporating the arts into English assignments. This page needs to reflect the complexity of what 7th graders do! It's more than just reading, writing, and arithmetic. The 1940s called and they want their subjects back...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.95.214.250 (talk) 04:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Negative numbers 

message: I don't think that it should be mentioned what students are learning, it varies from state to state, country to country.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelstarstar (talk • contribs) 06:57, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  subjects 

message: I didn't know that seventh grade students were usually 11-15 years old. I guess kids these days are so bad that they are repeating. --Alchaenist (talk) 03:47, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  7th grade students are usually 11-15 years old? 

message: Much of the content about the specific countries is already covered in the seventh grade article. There is no reason why they should be separate, even if they have a separate name. "Year 7" is mentioned in the seventh grade article and that is a more complete article. For not all the countries in the seventh grade article are called "seventh grade" either. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs)  04:37, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I would prefer not to implement this confusing merge because the numbers do not correspond in different systems.  Rather than try to merge conflicting numbering systems, it would be preferable to redirect each number to a general article about the numbering system used (grade for the US and year for the UK) and to mention the regions where these systems are used.  Dbfirs 06:36, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, two general articles would be better. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 11:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Year Seven]] 

message: Geometric patterns 197.184.177.188 (talk) 15:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematics 

message: 7th grade is actually the 8th year of standard formal education in the US, as the first year is kindergarten, and 1st grade is the second year.  Should we change the lead to reflect this? —Of the universe (say hello) 04:58, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  7th grade is actually the 8th year of education in the US
Talk:Eleventh grade

message: I would like to propose to add the information that Sec 5 (grade 11) is the final year of high school in Québec. ctjj.stevenson
:Just do so yourself. Georgia guy 18:29, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I've never heard grade 11 referred to as "junior year" anywhere in Canada, and unless anyone else has, outside of the fact that we are familiar with the American terms, reference to Canada here should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.226.87.9 (talk) 00:49, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  junior year? 

message: This article (along with other the articles in its series) does not strike me as being particularly noteworthy. I have already proposed fifth grade for deletion, and will most likely propose this one for deletion as well should the deletion of fifth grade go through.  In my opinion, these articles would be better dealt with in articles covering primary and secondary education throughout the world. Ekips (talk) 23:13, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: I have cleaned this article. Tell me what you think. I have done the same for 9th and 10th, soon for 12th.
:)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rmhs15 (talk • contribs) 17:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleaned the article up. 

message: Much of the content about the specific countries is already covered in the eleventh grade article. There is no reason why they should be separate, even if they have a separate name. "Year 11" is mentioned in the eleventh grade article and that is a more complete article. For not all the countries in the eleventh grade article are called "eleventh grade" either. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs)  04:10, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem with this confusing merge is that the most common use of "Year eleven" does not correspond with the most common use of "Eleventh grade".  It would be better to redirect each number to a general article where the system is explained.  See the comment on notability above. Dbfirs 07:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Year Eleven]]
Talk:The Stone Roses (album)

message: Was Silvertone still independent at the time? Wolf O'Donnel (talk) 00:58, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure it was, although I'd have to do some searching to find when it was acquired by BMG. Richard3120 (talk) 15:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silvertone
Talk:Bob Varsha

message: Not a terribly informative section. Anyone care to replace it with something more meaningful?
* I say delete that section. In addition to not being informative it's also badly written. 128.163.224.198 20:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 2005 United States Grand Prix 
Talk:German cruiser Deutschland

message: I decided to put the article at "Battleship Deutschland" because the other two of this class are also under "Battleship", and rather than list her as "Battleship Lutzow" (a name she only held for a few months, before being re-classified as a heavy cruiser), I listed her under her original name. Noel 22:40, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I split German_cruiser_L%C3%BCtzow into a dismabig to the two ships. GraemeLeggett 13:59, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Alrighty, I don't know about you folks, but usually ships are referred to as "she," not "it." So far as I know. It might be that the Germans did things differently, so I'm not sure if I should change it. I'll let folks debate it here and figure it out. Enjoy. --Phant 22:11, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  She/He/It 

message: "As retaliation the sister ship Admiral Scheer bombarded Almería killing 19 civilians and destroying 35 buildings ([1]). The dead were first brought to Gibraltar and buried there but the bodies were exhumed on Hitler's orders and accompanied the Deutschland back to Germany for a large military funeral with Hitler attending". Obviously it wasn't the Almeria civilians who were brought to Germany. I am editing the passage accordingly. L'omo del batocio 07:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This doesn't make sense

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 17:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: I removed the References in the Wehrmachtbericht section. Quoting primary source propaganda is not an appropriate way to write a Wikipedia article, and a mere mention such as  is more of a brief news bite than any sort of honor. –dlthewave ☎ 22:22, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Being referenced in the Wehrmachbericht was considered the same as being mentioned in despatches in the UK. It's not simply a news bite or propaganda. It was those things, but it was also more than that. Parsecboy (talk) 12:13, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  References in the Wehrmachtbericht
Talk:Hang-Ups (album)

message: --Gmangw 23:42, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chris Cayton 

message: I own the CD, and obtained the cover through an Itunes detection. I copied it into PS, and is now in the article. Fangz the Wolf 17:38, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added the Cover to the CD
Talk:Yugoslav Partisans

message: Hello @Peacemaker67, I made the removal of Tito's tomb photograph on the presumption that the section documents how Yugoslav Partisans are memorialized (i.e. how is their legacy remembered), combined with the fact that this part of the article is crowded with four images, one from the previous section and three including Tito's tomb and two monuments in this section. Tito is notable as Yugoslav Partisans' supreme commander, but his tomb isn't particularly relevant to this section. Images there should be dedicated to Partisans as a whole, as the two existing monument photographs are doing. –Vipz (talk) 23:52, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I disagree. Tito led the Partisans for the entire war. A photo of his tomb is highly relevant. If you are worried about crowding or sandwiching, a horizontal gallery at the bottom of the section is the way to address it. Cheers, Peacemaker67  (click to talk to me) 00:03, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Creating a gallery is a good suggestion, but we can agree to still disagree. Spomeniks predominantly depict (and are dedicated to) liberators as a collective (people's history) rather than a focus on a single great man. A people's hero monument of Tito would arguably be more relevant than the tomb though. –Vipz (talk) 00:55, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Yugoslav Partisans#Partisan legacy|§ Partisan legacy]] section images
Talk:Treaty

message: Cartel (intergovernmental agreement) seems to be a historic synonym for a particular types of treaty; it's a small article, perhaps best discussed within the concept of the wider concept. Klbrain (talk) 10:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I support the merger. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 22:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

text: Klbrain (talk) 05:39, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:List of shock sites

message: Due to the fact that there was only positive feedback aboug merging List of shock sites and Shock site (on Talk:Shock site), I have merged the two articles.  I suggest we move all future discussion to Talk:Shock site.  Mangojuicetalk 12:53, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged

message: Talk:Shock site/Meatspin has been created with the page history from Meatspin to preserve its history for GFDL purposes per Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 August 10 as content from Meatspin was merged into this article. Although this page was merged into Shock site, the content of Meatspin is present in the page history and (as it could be restored in future) the source history needs to be preserved as a result. WjBscribe 02:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attribution - [[Talk:Shock site/Meatspin]]
Talk:Elizabeth Cecil, 15th Baroness Ros

message: A note of caution: I believe Diana Cecil was the daughter of William Cecil's second wife, Elizabeth Drury, not his first wife, Elizabeth Manners. 
William Cecil and Elizabeth Manners married in 1589/90; their son William was born May 1590; Elizabeth died in May 1591.  There doesn't seem to be room in there for other children (and if they had survived their brother, they would have become Baron/Baroness de Ros in lieu of their cousin). - Nunh-huh 23:50, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:JOSS

message: I've removed this diambiguation notice from JOSS:
:This article is on the programming language. See also religion in China and incense, Joss Stone for the British female soul singer, or Joss Whedon for the television writer/producer
I can't see the connection with religion in China and incense (neither use the word Joss), and I don't believe the personalities were known only by their first name.
Pengo 23:23, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambig 

message: A suggestion for this article would be to not use any modern conventions, but to follow Cliff Shaw's original Joss typography and UI as closely as possible. For example, Joss was done on a very nice converted IBM typewriter (made by Tom Ellis and others at RAND), typed on fan-fold 8.5x11 paper that was drilled for one's looseleaf notebook, and the user's input was typed in green, with its replies typed in black and indented.
Another suggestion is to actually execute the Joss programs. It is annoying to have something nice like the Wikipedia, have a reasonable article about an early interactive language (like the ones on Joss and Logo) and not be able to try out examples even though we are reading the articles on a running computer that could execute them. JavaScript is more than capable for such examples, and I and a few friends decided to do a browser-only Logo embedded in a wiki to demonstrate how this could and should be. Go to LogoWiki (Don't! It's now a Russian site of some sort nothing to do with Logo) to try this. As of April 21st 2006 it is only a week old, but it should be pretty stable by the end of May.
Let's hope that the community will gradually make interpreters for the great programming languages and environments of the past!
:That would require that the specifications for those languages and interpreters be made available on-line to the community rather than buried in the RAND library. But I don't see the point -- just as we have far better environments than typewriters with green and black ribbons typing on fanfold paper, we have far better languages than JOSS and Logo, some with on-line interpreters, e.g., http://plaid.isri.cmu.edu:8080/plaidWebTerminal/plaid.cgi -- 98.108.210.171 (talk) 00:07, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Few Comments on Joss -- by Alan Kay 

message: Under References, the RAND report number of the "JOSS Users' Reference Manual" is  R-1555/9, not F-1535/9. After confirming the number with the RAND library, I made this correction. A. Rizzo (talk) 15:24, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference document number correction 

message: “See the section on Form below” says the article. And I see, I see, I see …  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.166.43.135 (talk) 13:24, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  See … nothing
Talk:Contiki

message: Is the PCEngine in the article the same as PC Engine?  I wasn't sure enough to change the link.  Joyous 00:05, Oct 30, 2004 (UTC)
I'm sure... but this port seems to be vapoware. Polluks 20:08, 2004 Nov 25 (UTC)
the pce port was real, but just like the nes, gba, gbc and gp32 ports it was never published, and i lost the sourcecode before it could make it into the 1.x main tree. the dreamcast and playstation ports however, were planned, but never existed. --62.143.152.25 (talk) 18:58, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is support for real-time scheduling: http://www.sics.se/~adam/contiki/docs-uipv6/a00377.html Rrelf (talk) 21:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed the claim that a port was being worked on for the Tandy Color Computer. According to the guy that was working on it, James Dessart, he has given up, as of Mon Jun 9 2003. He left this message on Usenet saying so:  Beyond the classroom 04:55, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tandy Coco

message: What are the differences with other OS's, like say Window, GNU/Linux, BeOS, Mac OS X, ... ? What does it sacrifice to be able to deliver its advantages? Shinobu (talk) 18:43, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences with other OS's? 

message: I thought I remembered reading that there were significant differences between the older 1.x series and the current 2.x series.  If someone knows more about this, something should be noted here. ⇔ ChristTrekker 18:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1.x vs 2.x 
Talk:Source

message: does that red link for "literature reference" need to be there?  I'm not quite sure what such an article would contain.  Visviva 01:13, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: WP:D says,"Do not add links that merely contain part of the page title (where there is no significant risk of confusion). Only add links to articles that could use essentially the same title as the disambiguated term. Disambiguation pages are not search indices." I think that many of the items listed in this article are included simply because they have the word "source" in them, which is inappropriate, and that users don't require disambiguation for most of them. --Pat (talk) 09:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: While, yes, links that merely contain "source" but are not referred to as such don't belong (e.g. Counter-Strike:Source), I felt that removing the sectioning went too far -- it looked like a mix of topics with no afterthought. So I've reverted. Individual items should be removed, and perhaps as a result the sectioning could be reduced but should not be eliminated whole cloth. --Goldfndr (talk) 20:00, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation and partial title matches
Talk:...And the Circus Leaves Town

message: What is the name of the secret track, and where is it on the album? Is it M'Deea?
I suspect that there is at least 2 versions of the album, all with slightly differing amounts of silence between "Spaceship Landing" and the two hidden tracks. The version I own (purchased in the UK) has the following timing:
"Spaceship Landing" – 00:00 - 11:15 (Josh Homme)"M'deea" – 14:48 - 15:02"Day One" – 32:14 - 34:04 (Scott Reeder)
I note from previous edits that this element has been changed several times. Is it worth noting the varying length of silence on different releases?
--Perry Comb-over (talk) 16:36, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track listing/secret track
Talk:Octans

message: Does this word come from octa-, which is the Greek numerical prefix for 8?? 66.32.252.184 01:23, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: No, octans/octantis implies Latin, had it been Greek it would have been octas/octantis per pattern of elephas/elephant(is). Said: Rursus 19:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the A Celestial Atlas by Alexander Jamieson Octans wrongly named Quadrans (true Quadrans named Quadrans Muralis) Ultima Thulean (talk) 01:37, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interesting fact
Talk:Corvette

message: The lead image for an article should not be of low quality unless other, better images are not to be found. Therefore, I will exchange the two images of Chinese vessels, making the poor-quality image last, and the modern, Taiwanese vessel first.
Sadly, this entire month-long edit war seems to have stemmed from the inclusion of flag icons in image captions, which is a violation of the MOS. Hubris has no place in Wikipedia.--Quisqualis (talk) 22:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2019: Imagery in article 

message: The article describes the Corvettes the Royal Canadian Navy operated, but does not list Canada as a current or former operator? Anyone got info? Greg Salter (talk) 17:53, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former operators 

message: Should we be using the spelling "manoeuvrable"? 168.91.242.168 (talk) 13:47, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This article appears to be using British English (e.g. -ise as in "categorised" somewhere in the article), so per MOS:ENGVAR, yes. Fork99 (talk) 12:17, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  British spelling 

message: It seems like a random word, what is its etymology? Formerlychucks (talk) 12:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The lead says  Fork99 (talk) 12:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does the word "corvette" actually mean?
Talk:Ultravisitor

message: Previous page was too opinionated, very unprofessional.  Updated with tracklisting and release notes.  I own one of the limited editions (bougt at an indie record store where they didn't know any better and had it at regular CD price!), and I read somewhere (either discogs.com or a google search) that there were only 1,000 (one thousand) copies of the limited edition released.  Looking for confirmation.  --Insomniak 8:21, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: i added rock music to the list of genres for the soft rock/classical guitar pieces and live drumming/bass in certain songs. --AlexOvShaolin 23:58, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  rock
Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Draft Trim/Archive 1

message: Overall, the draft trim has taken more of my time that it is worth. I accept Jallan's version, and I accept the style guide as it is now. Maurreen 20:40, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, I agree with Maurreen. It's taken too much time. But I think the version that Maurreen and I agree on, is superior to what is there now, though of course far from perfect. And there is no use in that time being wasted. None of jguk's suggested changes were reversions to the current style sheet, so jguk seemingly does take the version that I last edited as superior to what currently exists, though far from what jguk would like (and what I would like.) But the set time limit has passed. Unless jguk or someone else objects in the next few hours, (after I've slept for the night) I will take it that there is consensus that the trim I last edited from Maurreen's work contstitutes an acceptable improvement and will move its contents to the main page. (Of course, anyone can always revert later or attempt further changes, or revert part of it. Anything can still be undone if there is consensus to undo it.) I still do strongly approve strongly of many of jguk's suggestions for improvement and will support  jguk on those if jguk wishes to continue the matter, or may even forward them myself, though I currently find myself rather tired of this and would on my own not take the initiative immediately. (There is some value in letting a new version lie for a while also and put some more thought into future improvements.)  Jallan 02:33, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: No big deal
Talk:Unschooling

message: If someone has time, adding the parallels to John Dewey and his educational philosophy would be an asset to this page in terms of context. 2604:CA00:10B:851:0:0:26C:5094 (talk) 18:25, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  John Dewey 

message: The term "unschooler" is ambiguously used in this page both to refer to students who are learning in an unschooled milieu, and to parents/guardians who direct the education of their children in such a manner. Is there a better term for one or the other case (or both cases) that can be used consistently to relieve this ambiguity? —Moorlock (talk) 23:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: unschooler or grown unschooler should be used to refer to the people who were unschooled, and unschooling parent should be used to refer to the adults who decided to unschool their children. Tekrmn (talk) 16:46, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguous use of "unschooler"
Talk:Canton of St. Gallen

message: http://www.statistik.admin.ch/stat_ch/ber00/ekan_sg.htm
: I'm not finding an "Official Statistics" external link that matches this. Tobyc75 (talk) 22:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Official Statistics" external link is providing a 404 error 

message: In the infobox it gives 85 municipalities - but the linked to page has 77. Clarification? Jackiespeel (talk) 18:08, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated page to 2017 numbers.Tobyc75 (talk) 15:14, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks - with what I am doing on the local government wiki coming across much that needs updating here. Jackiespeel (talk) 12:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of Municipalities
Talk:James Madison-class submarine

message: I'm not sure I like deleting the boat list.  The infobox doesn't have the hull numbers.  Elde 06:41, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Godzilla vs. SpaceGodzilla

message: I haven't seen this movie, alas, but the name "Moguera" caught my eye -- wasn't this the name of the alien's giant mole robot in Inishiro Honda's The Mysterians?  -- Antaeus Feldspar 07:08, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Moguera
Talk:Professional warrior

message: Professional warrior was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was MERGE
You would not expect a random bit of information about aztec culture under such a heading. Move to either aztec, warrior, soldier or mercenary. dab 07:18, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC)