Talk:Bilal ibn Rabah

message: Is the Bilali Document related to this?--Striver 18:21, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bilal Document?

message: It is against Islamic Law to portray oneself in a painting or in any hand drawn sketch.  Thank You!
Is Bilal ibn Rabah a different sahabah from Bilal ibn Harith? BelalHaniffa (talk) 04:51, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Please remove the picture

message: Despite the fact that many Muslims believe they are prohibited from depicting living things, we shouldn't have to follow those guidlines here on wikipedia. The historical representation of Muslim figures deserves mention and, where relevant, examples of those depictions should be provided.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.32.192.33 (talk) 17:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That’s absurd. Not that I agree with the prohibition on images. But deeming a painting from the 15th century to be relevant to a 6th century person is bizarre. Who does that? Temple3 (talk) 16:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures should stay

message: The article spells his name as "Bilal ibn Rabah". That is what I have learnt too. Why is the title "Bilal ibn Ribah"? -- Raziman T V's Alternate account (Talk - Contribs)  13:34, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: "Bilal, son of Rabah" is not his name. I moved the page back to what it was. I also believe that such a move should be discussed in the talk page. Unflavoured (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move 

message: It is obvious that from the name it self, "Bilal al Habashi", Bilal was of an Ethiopian Origin. "Habashi" or "Habesh" Refers to today's Ethiopia. Trying to change this to other country is nonsense. Please let's try to use this media sensibly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilalalhabashi (talk • contribs) 21:21, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have to agree. "Bilal was an Arab" or even Afro-Arab is not the popular version of events. He was as per above an Ethiopian. That is known the world over and actually because he is Ethiopian is why he is significant and notable in Islamic history. But one bad reference labels him as Afro-Arab and the link dishoneslty says "Arab", then why not put Afro-Arab?--41.177.4.184 (talk) 16:01, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please do Not try to re-write history! 

message: This article needs to be validated by sources. Especially, the sections Living with Muhammad, Migration, After Muhammad, and Legacy. Unsourced material can be deleted, so please cite the sources for these sections. Thanks Zabranos (talk) 22:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs more sources/Validation

message: For anyone who wants to cite information correctly use Easybib.com. Its a simple and easy to use tool that cites books, magazines, websites, newspapers, and other materials in MLA format.Zabranos (talk) 23:53, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation Tool 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Bilal Ibn Rabah. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100720142403/http://www.usc.edu:80/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/053.sbt.html to http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/hadith/bukhari/053.sbt.html#004.053.359
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:29, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The story that is more authentic is where Umayyah and Abu Bakr talk about gold. The story of Abu Bakr giving three of his slaves for Bilal is considered not authentic. Here is the source https://www.islamreligion.com/articles/4722/bilal-ibn-rabah-part-1/  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.56.45.238 (talk) 05:59, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Dear 24.56.45.238, do you have a source that is not a blog? The assertion is currently very strongly referenced. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 06:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Bilal was bought by Abu Bakr. 

message: {{subst:trim|1=
After use PBUH which means Peace be Upon Him after Mohammad (PBUH). 
: Not done: We do not use such honorifics in the encyclopedia. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:28, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 22 April 2021 

message: , I agree with : CE is more appropriate here. Drmies (talk) 14:15, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  CE 

message: you should place (S.A.W) after the prophet Mohammed (S.A.W) every time you mention his name. Please make this change ASAP. Thank you. Hassan him (talk) 19:11, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: We don't use honorifics of that sort. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

text: See :Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Islam-related articles-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:13, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 June 2022 

message: 1.Copyright infringement: If the picture used on the Wikipedia page of Hadrat Bilal infringes on someone else's copyright, it should be removed to avoid legal issues. XUnknown Entity (talk) 07:11, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This picture should be removed  

message: The source quoted by the author of the article never uses the word allegedly to discuss the royal ancestry of Bilal’s mother. It’s a gratuitous insertion intended to cast aspersions on the events. No bueno. Check the source. Temple3 (talk) 16:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of Allegedly Concerning the Status of Bilal’s Mother