lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wagadu

message: There was an apparent confusion about Wagadugu (which is Ouagadougou in a non-French orthography) and Wagadu or Wagadou which is a name for the ancient Ghana Empire. I corrected this redirect. It may be that a disambiguation page is called for to which the Wagad* names are directed. --A12n 03:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:List of non-alcoholic mixed drinks

message: Hey there.  I was wondering if anyone knew the recipe for Non-alcoholic traffic lights?
Frodo 11011 02:14, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: The daquiri does not have any sort of ingredients or methods listed. Therefore is it really necessary to have it listed?? Or someone put something next to it besides question marks.
--AgKid 04:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Nada Daquiri 

message: I'm going to clean up this list. I'm seeing a few issues.
* Remove non-ref'd, non-article entries
* Remove anything not explicitly made as a non-alcoholic beverage (saying you can make non-alcohol versions of ANYthing doesn't count unless it has a separate article on the non-alcoholic one)
* Remove anything that is a mixer or ingredient 
* Remove anything that is a general drink ("punch" is an acceptable entry, "kool-aid" is pushing it.)
Hopefully this makes sense and can help guide future additions (since all lists are incomplete, yadda yadda). Cheers, Estheim (talk) 20:42, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems like you did a good job cleaning up the virgin drink section. There are only two on there now and they seem appropriate. Both of these drinks require a good amount of ingredients and are not spirit forward, so it makes some sense to include them here. SaltyCalculator (talk) 21:48, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  List Clean Up Tag
Talk:Gassire's Lute

message: Which Wagadu is intended? The name can be that of Ghana Empire, or another location? --A12n 03:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

message: The quote seems original research and (as noted) the article needs better citations.  (John User:Jwy talk) 05:40, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems
Talk:Wo Shing Wo

message: Attention to 1941: This implied the WSW helped Japanese kill Chinese villagers. Surely this is a load of rubbish. 81.154.27.213 (talk) 02:01, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  1941 

message: I removed the following line from the minibus section:
The current owner of Wo Shing Wo (和勝和) is Trent Shaw.
It's unreferenced, and a quick search seems to confirm that Trent Shaw is head of the Wo Hop To.
Cossaxx (talk) 17:05, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trent Shaw  

message: I moved these from the history section to talk for discussion because although they are referenced they are individual incidents.  Do they real add anything to an article on a triad?  I assume there are numerous other killings that occurred/ RJFJR (talk) 17:15, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: History, individual incidents
Template talk:WPRU Announcements

message: Please update this as participants feel neccessary. Removed items at the bottom, add to the top. Shudda talk 04:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

message: This dispute arises from my editing and updating of the pages relating to women's international sevens rugby union. Some 50 or so nations have separate women's pages - those who have also played test rugby - but another 60 or so have only played sevens, and have no national team page. Pages could be created for all of these nations but at present, in most cases, these would be little more than stubs and would probably be deleted.
However the history of most women's national teams - certainly for the minor nations - closely reflects that of their men's teams. In quite a few cases the women's teams began playing at the same time as the men's. They all represent (and are selected by) the same unions, play in the same kit, etc. The simplest solution seemed, therefore, to include a small paragraph about the existence and playing history of the women's team on the main national team page, linked to the main women's sevens data pages. In fact looking around this has already been done with Andorra, for example.
Unfortunately I am told that this is not possible. 
"It may be sexist, but I'm afraid that's how it is. These pages are about men's national XVs. The women's pages are listed separately, as the national sevens teams (of both genders). The "rugby union in X" pages could do with a bit of filling out in most cases anyway.--MacRusgail (talk) 14:21, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Content of National Team pages
Talk:Klieves, Kraft & Company

message: This page is meant to give information regarding the Klieves, Kraft and Co., an architectural firm that built or expanded many structures within the city of Wheeling, West Virginia that are now on the National Register of Historic Places. The buildings include, but are not limited to: The Robert W. Hazlett House, buildings within The Monroe Street East Historic District, and The Oglebay Mansion. (see: National Register of Historic Places listings) (see also: Biographies and Histories of Individuals in Question AND National Register Information System)Morganismysheltie 04:08, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It does appear that a speedy delete would be inappropriate SUBWAYguy 05:11, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Kingston, New York railroad stations

message: The article as written is confusing and should probably be split. My sense is that there should be two articles, one on the New York Central Railroad station and its precursors, and one on the New York, Ontario and Western station:
* Kingston station (Ulster and Delaware Railroad)
* Kingston station (New York, Ontario and Western Railway)
I did some searching on newspapers.com and didn't find much evidence of the former Ulster and Delaware depot being called "Union" station, at least not by the mid-1950s. For all that, my 1950 Official Guide implies that both the New York Central and the New York, Ontario and Western, used the same station. This is slightly complicated by the fact that the New York Central also served Kingston, Ontario, although if this was at Kingston railway station (Ontario) it's not covered in that article. Mackensen (talk) 22:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split article? 

message: Someone blocked this page, or I would have done it myself.
For fourth Kingston station, should read “New York Ontario and Western RailWAY”, NOT “railroad”. 2600:1004:B167:E3AB:7494:B37E:CF0C:5E36 (talk) 05:05, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change word in first section. 

message: See last edit of 5/2022 and follow it. Thank you. 2600:1004:B167:E3AB:5444:4D3A:2852:918C (talk) 02:30, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please edit blocked page
Category talk:Massacres in Sri Lanka

message: Does it make sense to distinguish this category from 
:Category:War crimes in Sri Lanka? Please see discussion there: Category talk:War crimes in Sri Lanka#Relation to massacres. On that same page, we're also discussing what should happen with :Category:Terrorist attacks attributed to the LTTE . — Sebastian 04:09, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please see discussion on war crimes page
Talk:Frances Shand Kydd

message: Random point, but near the end where Mrs. Shand Kydd's last days are discussed, she is said to have suffered from 'brain disease'. Does anyone know what this is supposed to be? I'm a medical student and I can't tell if this the Parkinson's disease mentioned in the next clause or some other pathology of the brain.
Something else about the Parkison's disease. It is stated as "cause of death", but this illness does in fact do a lot of things to you but not cause your death.
I have removed the photograph of Maxine Riddington from Frances Shand Kydd's page. Why is this a relevant photograph? It encourages you to click on the hyperline to the stub on Maxine Riddington which only gives you information on the books she has written on FSK. 
A more appropriate photograph of FSK should be uploaded.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nollie (talk • contribs) 13:35, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Common wallaroo

message: If the Eastern Wallaroo and the Euro "are actually two distinct sub-species" of Macropus robustus, then surely they are the same species.Spathaky (talk) 10:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Same species

message: First, I believe the first sentence misues the word "family." 
Second, I am not clear whether Eastern Wallaroo is the species Macropus robustus or the sub-species of it, M. r. robustus. I would think, from the geographical distribution given, it is the latter. In that case we have no common name for the species, unless it is Common Wallaroo (but I am guessing here). It is not Wallaroo as there is another species of Wallaroo within the genus Macropus, namely M. bernardus, Woodward's Wallaroo. See Macropus and Macropodidae however which apply the name Eastern Wallaroo to the whole species not just one saub-species. For consistency with those articles I suggest the following changed text here:
The Eastern Wallaroo (Macropus robustus) is one of about a dozen surviving species of the genus Macropus, of which two species are known as Wallaroos (or perhaps three, as the Antelopine Kangaroo is sometimes known as the Antelopine Wallaroo). M. robustus is also known as the Common Wallaroo or the Hill Wallaroo. The Eastern Wallaroo is mostly nocturnal and solitary, and is one of the more common macropods. It makes a loud hissing noise and some subspecies are sexually dimorphic, like most wallaroos (ref as before).
M. robustus has four sub-species:
*M. r. robustus - the nominate sub-species. (then as text. However the range should be clarified. Is it Eastern Australia or just the eastern slopes of the Great Dividing Range?)
*M. r. erubescens - the Euro. (then as text) The photograph at right is a Euro.
*(The other two species as text.)
Perhaps someone with some expertise will confirm whether my proposed changes are correct.
Spathaky (talk) 11:18, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Common names not clear

message: Currently the article states that reclassification of the genus macropus (and with it the change to osphranter) is due to the 2019 publication and was accepted 2020 by the Australian Faunal Directory. However the Australian Faunal Directory itself states here: 
:"The genus Macropus was split by Jackson & Groves (2015), by raising the subgenera Macropus, Notamacropus and Osphranter to genus level."
--Kmhkmh (talk) 03:29, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  taxonomy change
Template talk:Campaignbox French Revolutionary Wars in Italy

message: Now that we have a campaignbox that lists the individual battles, perhaps we should start a page on the Italian campaigns of the French Revolutionary Wars.  And have this campaignbox point to the new page, which in turn points back to the French Revolutionary Wars page.  No/Yes?  The Gomm 01:19, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like a good idea. Kirill Lokshin 05:18, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  page for French Revolutionary Wars in Italy ?
Talk:The Basil Brush Show

message: Despite being mentioned in all the original press material for the series, I can't find any information on this character, not even so much as a screencap. Even the official site has absolutely nothing of use.
Can anyone provide any more information? Or at least an image of what the character looks like?--Tenka Muteki 04:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, we need photos of all the characters in the article, as well.  UncleMontezuma 10:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Roxy is an Arctic fox who looks very white and very lady-like. She pronounces Basil with emphasis on the 'il'. Photos of the characters would be very nice if there are some free ones out there, because fair-use is usually not permitted for living people. But does this also apply to foxes? Gidi70 04:45, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roxy 

message: The actress India Beau is on the show credited as playing the character India. In the article the character also has the surname Beau. Has this surname ever been mentioned in the show? Gidi70 04:51, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, so I changed the names around. In fact, the name she goes by nowadays is apparently India de Beaufort, so I added that with the imdb as the source. Gidi70 01:59, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The irony... Shortly after I made the change, the Popwar episode was repeated on BBC3, in which India is actually referred to as India Beau, not only once, but twice... So I changed the text again. Gidi70 17:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  India 

message: I don't see any evidence that the characters from this show are independently notable from the show itself; the article List of Basil Brush Show characters has no references.  This article isn't so long, so it doesn't need to be split off for length reasons. As such, I recommend that that article be merged in here (and possibly be trimmed in the process, since none of it is verified). Qwyrxian (talk) 02:19, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: The official site says 2000: http://basilbrush.com/history/ -- Logosncompanies (talk) 20:32, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the graphic there indicates some time between 2000 and 2007. -- Dr Greg  talk  22:55, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2002 show started in 2000
Talk:Bombsuit

message: I'm pretty sure this article should be expanded, merged with body armor or deleted. Anyone want to expand it? GutterMonkey 04:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Bomb suits are a highly specialised subtype of body armor not intended for general usage by a, say, riflemen.--79.139.166.114 (talk) 18:34, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: We see these things in movies and stuff all the time, but are they actually still used? I can't imagine that they'd actually protect the wearer from a couple of sticks of TNT at a range close enough to defuse the bomb. Is this article here as a part of military history, or is it current?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.3.111.41 (talk) 11:00, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They are actually used: Development of a Bomb Suit Standard Hohum (talk) 19:37, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Actual Use? 

message: Are these things bulletproof?--79.139.166.114 (talk) 18:35, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bulletproof? 

message: Almost always bomb suit with a space: see e.g. Google Books search results. That is probably the main spelling Wikipedia should use. 86.131.98.77 (talk) 10:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: There's no rationale here for the spam tag; and it doesn't seem promotionally written to me. Therefore I'm removing it. 87.194.8.35 (talk) 22:46, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spam tag 

message: Where are the citations? Seriously, how can anyone take this article for anything more than an anecdote; if there are no citations?Aryeonos (talk) 21:17, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  No citations. 

message: I was just about to slap a merger tag on this article when I noticed it already had one. Advanced Bomb Suit is simply a rehashing of this article and should be merged with this one. Also, shouldn't the title of this article be "bomb suit" not "bombsuit"? --ErgoSum•talk•trib 16:18, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The advanced bomb suit is not a type of Bomb suit but rather the U.S. Army's name for it's bombsuit. Marcus Qwertyus  02:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: "Bomb suit" seems quite an informal name compared to "EOD suit". The page already refers to EOD technicians via their correct name. Of the page references:
* 3 refer to "bombs" due to discussing historical subject matter.
* 1 notes that "bomb disposal" is now known as "EOD" (but doesn't refer to the suits at all).
* 1 includes manufacturer data where the term "EOD" is used throughout.
* 3 aren't linked, but the names refers to "Explosive Ordnance Disposal Personal Protective Equipment (EOD PPE)", "Explosive Ordnance Disposal", and "Explosives Ordnance Disposal (EOD) suits".
* 2 aren't linked and the names include neither term (these are the same reference btw).
194.66.32.10 (talk) 14:44, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct naming?
Talk:List of Champions Tour major championship winning golfers

message: Looks like either it should be called "Golfers with Champions Tour major championship wins" or remove the ones with fewer than 3 wins.--Berol (talk) 20:37, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's modeled after Golfers with most major championship wins and Golfers with most LPGA major championship wins which also list all winners. So if you change this one you should change the other two as well. Note that the details of which majors were won is not available for the ones with only a few wins. Tewapack (talk) 20:43, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Changing all articles in some way sounds good to me.  Another option is to separate the non-detailed part into a separate section.--66.122.76.165 (talk) 23:44, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

text: Now details are only missing for those with 1 win, although that all was tangential to the OP's point. Changing one doesn't mean you have to change all 3 articles, either.--76.209.221.224 (talk) 22:06, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name change?

message: Following the above discussion from 13+ years ago, shall we:
#Rename this article to reflect that all major winners are listed (e.g. List of Champions Tour major championship winning golfers)
#Apply selection criteria and remove those below a certain threshold (3 seems to make sense)?
The similar (regular) "men's" article was moved. Thoughts please. wjematherplease leave a message... 10:57, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have thought option 1 makes most sense. As you imply, there's really no sense in option 2 unless you're going for 3 or (probably) 4 or 5 as a minimum. Nigej (talk) 12:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

text: Option 1 Tewapack (talk) 17:32, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename or apply criteria?
Talk:List of golfers with most LPGA Tour wins

message: The sorter in the Rank column is doing an alphabetic sort instead of a numeric sort. I have no idea how to fix that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.153.116.115 (talk) 03:53, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

message: Can someone explain why players under 50 are shown in bold? If this chart were about PGA Tour players this would be relevant, because after age 50 players there can switch to the Champions Tour and often don't add to their win total.  This is not relevant for the LPGA Tour. Even if you want to reference the almost non-existent Legends Tour, the age cut-off for that is age 45, not 50.  --Crunch (talk) 10:52, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Having received no response to my above comment over the last month, I have removed the bolding for players under age age 50. It seems obviously to be an ignorant carryover from List of golfers with most PGA Tour wins. --Crunch (talk) 15:00, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why are Players Under 50 in Bold? 

message: Shouldn't those players who are still active on tour be in bold, like with the men? Makes it much easier to read!
Ross-shire (talk) 19:20, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Active players 
Talk:Jess Mariano

message: Should get married!!
jess is really good for rory and everybody knows it. they both love each other. Rory always kisses him whenever she is in a relationship, like at sookies wedding which she went with dean to, and when she went to pesilvania to see Jess and the book that he wrote and they kissed when she was going out with Logan. so there is something that you should consider
Jess and Rory should have been together. Logan is such a jerk. She takes him back time after time when he does something stupip and ridiculous. And Dean wasn't the one even though some people think so. Jess is the one for her. Even though theyb supposedly ended his character they still should end up together even if its for a second on the series finale. And in real life Alexis Bledel and Milo should get back together. I mean being an off-set couple is saying alot. They're such a cute couple.
This is an interesting use for the talk page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.173.28.220 (talk) 10:13, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Awad Hamed al-Bandar

message: CNN reports that he is not yet executed - Saddam only on December 29, citing Iraqi state television.
I just saw the same thing. I'm removing the death notice until it's clear one way or the other. djrobgordon 05:20, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Women's World Golf Rankings

message: Why there is not the year end rankings for each year like in Official World Golf Ranking? I vaguely remember seeing those here also, but couldn't though find them now. 85.217.46.172 (talk) 02:43, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical rankings 

message: See: http://www.golf.com/tour-news/2017/06/05/lydia-ko-remains-number-1-world-despite-reports-contrary Nigej (talk) 10:16, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement from WWGR, Inc. technical provider regarding this week’s Rolex Women’s World Golf Rankings (June 4, 2017) 
Talk:Khmelnytskyi Airport

message: I have moved this article back to Khmelnytskyi Airport from Khmel'nyts'kyy Airport. The current is a more correct transliteration of Ukrainian and uses English transliterations. If anyone wants to have the former title back, please propose a move here and post at the Ukrainian notice board before continuing the move-war... —dima/s-ko/ 05:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm fine as per ICAO UKLH  it has only one apostrophe = KHMELNYTS'KYI. --TAG 05:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move
Talk:Sloyd

message: This article appears to be a personal statement rather than an encyclopedic article following Wikipedia policies and guidelines. I will make sure that you get a copy of links on your talk page. Thanks, Mattisse 04:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've got in front of me a book entitled "Paper Sloyd for Primary Grades" (Ginn & Company, 1905) which is written by Ednah Anne Rich. Rich is referenced in this Wikipedia article as it stands now as the founder of the Santa Barbara School... but in this book she writes that the Manual Training School was founded by Anna S. C. Blake in 1891-1892. Is this the same school? Perhaps a revision is in order? Gus andrews (talk) 15:17, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sloyd in America
Talk:Tequila Sunrise (song)

message: Can anyone tell me what the story is? Are there two guys ... the singer and the "hired hand" involved? ... and who messed with whom?  Sfahey (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: I love this song, but ...

message: There's a typo in quote "highlghted by some excellent[...]" instead of highlighted 2A02:8071:A583:D9A0:A132:5535:870F:2B9 (talk) 12:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo
Talk:Peaceful Easy Feeling

message: Is the second paragraph of the lede--the one about Tommy Shannon listening to "Peaceful Easy Feeling" when he heard that Stevie Ray Vaughn had been killed in a helicopter accident--really necessary and properly placed? It's a poignant story, but doesn't really tell us anything about the song itself. If it's included in this article at all, it should be a last paragraph in the "Background" section, not the lede. Anyone have a different POV? --Schoolmann (talk) 20:18, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story about Tommy Shannon and Stevie Ray Vaughn 

message: Lomg time local san diego musician..i can attest to the Der Wienerschnitzel in San Diego story. Even more, just a few yrs ago they? the city? actually placed a plaque there, at the Der to commemorate the location.. at Washington St and 1st. Just checked Map app, it's a freaking coffee/donut drive thru now.. the familiar A-frame is still there but, geez.. So sad. I'll drive over there soon and see if palque there or gone.. Ah, you guys, Wikipedia aren't you in san diego? go see -you know- it's in Hillcrest. 2600:1700:A760:C10:58CF:7ECE:5FBB:B2B9 (talk) 17:50, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  ah shist...!