lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Battle of Carentan

message: 1. This article is called 'Battle of Carentan', not the 'History of WW ll', so I have deleted about six sentences (the stuff about the US entry into the war and so on), from para 1.
2.Deleted 'mortar' in para 6. As far as I know, the Germans did not have 88mm mortars, only AA/Atk guns.
3.Someone with knowledge of WW ll American units and formations will have to try and make sense of all these numbers, e.g. 'Two battalions of the 506th', the '501st's 3rd battalion', the '401st Glider Infantry' and so on.
This article is still in a bit of a mess, it needs a lot more work; I don't have anymore time and besides, I'm exhausted !
RASAM 12:58, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The article does need a lot of work done to it! As I find time I will help to clean it up and add to it. -- Underneath-it-All 23:27, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Cole was supposed to begin the attack at 12:00 am on June 10. But bridge number two had been destroyed and the engineers had been pinned down by 88 mm fire. Lieutenant Gueldaff’s patrol paddled across the Douve river, and went down the causeway in single file. At bridge number four they found a Belgian Gate and pried it open, where they could get through one by one. They then came under heavy fire. Gehaudf sent two runners with a message to Cole, "but the runners passed on the wrong message". They told Cole not to go forward because the opposition was too heavy. At the same time Cole got word from battalion that he was to postpone the attack.
Lieutenant Gueldaff is not mentioned within the article, let alone his patrol or what regiment or company he is part of. This will be confusing to readers because it's written as if he has already been introduced. --Rhykin 03:36, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All of the above taken care of.--Buckboard 00:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 
Talk:Glaze3D

message: "The 1200 model's claimed specifications would place it as the rough equivalent of the GeForce FX 5200 Ultra or Radeon 9200 Pro, while its claimed performance would place it at the same level as the GeForce 3 Ti 500 or Radeon 8500."
So, which one is it? --Iceheart3910 17:47, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The performance claims were being made by Bitboys and so were compared to cards of the time. I think the author of the article was comparing the technical specifications to cards that came later (that is to say, the GeForce FX and Radeon 9000 series were built with the number of units/pipeline configs/etc. that the Glaze3D would have had). Tech specs and actual performance could see large discrepancies, so even though no actual hardware was made, despite its ambitious futuristic design it still could have performed worse than the claims. Fishy c (talk) 03:21, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion
Talk:Atticus: Dragging The Lake III

message: After doing some general clean-up I got to thinking, 'should this even be here?'. Considering it is a compilation it doesn't fit to well when trying to enter the artist :). Pretender2j 13:33, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

message: There's nothing here to copyedit... why was it tagged as needing copyediting? --Natalie 03:07, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the tag. JenLouise 06:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  why copyediting
Talk:Village lock-up

message: Not sure if this organisation is still active but they attempted to create a register of all known lock-ups (sadly no online access to them):
The Village Lock-up Association
7 Inch's Yard, Market Street, Newbury, Berkshire RG14 5DP
Tel: +00 44 (0)1635-42864, Fax: +00 44 (0)1635-552366 
Robdav69, 20 July 2006.
The organisation does still exist but access to records and papers are strictly by written appointment - AP 16 Oct 2007
The VLA has moved to Ringway House, Kelvin Road, Newbury RG14 2DB.  Its one-million word initial report was presented to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport in 2007, and is now being prepared for publication in 2017 - AP 21 Aug 2014.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.225.105 (talk) 07:12, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Village Lock-up Association

message: Wikipedia expects you to sign up before making edits and for you to flag any changes using your username with 4 tilds (~).
I have re-written this article because an unknown user(s) added spurious content that went into the history of imprisonment and punishment beyond the article focus - please read about Wiki articles before making such changes.  They also went on about a specific building in London which I would suggest is turned into an article in its own right (The Tun).  Very interesting stuff but not central to the subject matter of  existent village lock-ups.
Robdav69 18:03, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NOTE, NOTE, NOTE to rogue editors of this article

message: The beauty of Wiki is that it is open to all and is free.  Adding your list of existing village lock-ups  to this article would be most welcome - I have found most locations from google searches and travels around the UK.
Robdav69 18:03, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Dear AP
Talk:Zamboanga City/Archive 1

message: "... In the 1990s, Zamboanga was notorious as the site of repeated kidnappings and attempted kidnappings and extortion of Westerners by fundamentalist Moro Muslim separatists known as the Abu Sayyaf."
                                                       - From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
i disagree with the above statement. indeed in 1990s incidents about the kidnappings of westerners by the abu sayyaf were rampant but those didn't happen right in the city.  the other islands which are also part of the zamboanga peninsula and have been the abusayaf's haven are separated from the city proper of zamboanga by sea.  zamboanga city has remained peaceful to these days. muslims and christians managed to live peacefully for years. i have known the city all throughout my life.
the abu sayaf are in basilan not in zamboanga city.....dont ruin the reputation of zamboanga city, since its peacefull.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.126.6.76 (talk • contribs)  
I have a question. Under the demographics, does 'Spanish-Filipino' and 'Chinese-Filipino' refer to mestizos? M P M 01:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Parenthesis

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parenthesis is totaly wrong, parenthesis is (), brackets and braces are [] and {}....
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=parenthesis
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=braces
how could you make this big of a mistake...haha
::The Oxford English Dictionary does not agree with the comments above. Michael Hardy 23:25, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: wtf
Talk:The Martian Child

message: The following section was deleted as it injects op-ed commentary into this article:
"This is an interesting celebrity example of many cases of adoption by gay parents.  This is an important social commentary, considering bans and attempts to ban gay adoption in Florida and many other states.  Anyone interested in the story after seeing the movie should probably read the novel version rather than the novelette."
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rjp2006 (talk • contribs) 13:52, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: I'm confused - was this one book or two? Is the "story" the novel, the novelette or both? --Ephilei (talk) 03:05, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many books 

message: uhhh, is this true or vandalism? because I could see it either way.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.118.144.236 (talk) 23:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I reworte slightly and added 3 sources.Yobmod (talk) 10:11, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  homosexuality
Talk:Live in Boston (Fleetwood Mac album)

message: This article clearly isn't NPOV, and if no-one objects, I'll edit it in a few days. Bretonbanquet 13:54, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Elias Fund

message: Hello, this page appears blank at the moment, so I will dive right in. If someone feels that the page lacks NPOV then they should simply add a section. I am assuming this feeling is related to the idea that charities only make the current poor governance sustainable, and I have talked with several people who share this view. The charity's ideas and ethos are presented here rather plainly and I do not feel that this should be disturbed. If you feel that something is being left out, post it here.
Drew.Cason 16:51, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

message: The link to the Elias Fund website appears to have been repurposed. Perhaps squatted or trojaned?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gehrhorn (talk • contribs) 16:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valid Website?
Talk:Uno (Muse song)

message: Here we go, the Uno single article has been created. Hopefully the rest of the tracklistings that have not been put on Wikipedia should be up soon. Any additions/corrections would be extremely welcome. Xtrememachineuk 14:21, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Uno (Muse Song) Created

message: Is there any reason why this is at "Uno (Muse song)" rather than "Uno (song)"? There are no other songs called Uno. I will move the page if there are no objections. Mahahahaneapneap 21:28, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the page Mahahahaneapneap 15:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move page?
Talk:Natural Wild

message: I only removed the stub as it was a red link. Great to see a conservative Lutheran helping out with another unquestionably God-inspired music, albeit from a different religious background, Ras Billy I 14:21, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Frenulum of the tongue

message: cutting to pronounce English? http://www.fandeath.net/menu/tongue.htm — Omegatron 15:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: cutting

message: Probably should add something about what happens if you sever/damage your frenulum. --Mizower 19:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: loss

message: Hi, just adding some info that is interesting.  Trying my best to add relevant information and cite it properly.  If there's any trouble with it, I'll let someone else worry about it. --Mizower 19:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Disorders

message: Figured this may be good to have, may overlap with other articles. --Mizower 19:41, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Piercing/Comps

message: Added info regarding embryological dev of frenulum --Mizower 19:58, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Developmental

message: I was trying to learn what the part of the tongue that tethers it down is called (the frenulum or frenulum linguae) and it was nowhere on the main tongue page. I found the answer elsewhere, and then discovered it has its own wiki page, but is not referenced at all on the main tongue page. Perhaps a tongue enthusiast editor can fix that. (note I'm commenting this on both the frenulum linguae page, and the tongue page) 24.230.137.165 (talk) 02:46, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frenulum Linguae not mentioned on main tongue page 

message: this edit was reverted , assume because no source, but the reverted statement appears to support the case illustrated in the article. It would be good to see if a source could support this definition. Lesion (talk) 20:02, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  definition
Talk:USS North Carolina (1820)

message: I don't think it would hurt if some went through here and cut out a bunch of links for dates etc. --Howdybob 14:24, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, did it myself. Many of these naval articles are a bit overlinked though. --Howdybob 14:34, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Overlinked

message: "Considered by many the most powerful naval vessel then afloat..."
First of all, who is "many"? Second, if "many" does refer to some actual group of people then they were mistaken. She was not even remotely the most most powerful naval vessel then afloat. Built for 74 guns, she would have been on par with a British third-rater. True, her extra armament gave her 104 guns, but the British Caledonia-Class first-raters (active through North Carolina's entire existence) were built for 120 guns and presumably carried more than that. Beetfarm Louie (talk) 14:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Most powerful naval vessel then afloat"
Talk:FN P-90

message: 1. Fixed various typos.
2. Reworded sentence in para 1.
3. Deleted: " and offered for export by FN". The previous part of the same sentence already mentions different countries which are equipped with the P-90.
4.Standardized spelling to European style - it's a European weapon.
RASAM 14:28, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Nancy Drew: Curse of Blackmoor Manor

message: Greetings! Before this edit, there were two articles on this game: here and at Curse of Blackmoor Manor. This article started as Nancy drew Curse of Blackmoor Manor and had been proposed for deletion. I expanded it and then discovered the other article, which I merged into this one.
I am using the "...(computer game)" article as the main one because it is consistent with the other games in the Nancy Drew series. I suspect (but have not researched to confirm) that the games are based on Nancy Drew books, in which case the Curse of Blackmoor Manor page will at some point become either the article on the book (preferably, IMHO) or a disambiguation page between the book and game. —C.Fred (talk) 14:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: About the article title

message: I'd like to remind people that Wikipedia is not meant to eliminate major plot details just because they "ruin" the story. Not revealing who the culprit is despite it being a significant detail for Wikipedia in order to not ruin the ending is against Wikipedia guidelines.Neverneverland2 (talk) 19:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: Spoilers 
Talk:Lactuca serriola

message: There is no picture of Lactuca Serriola.  There is a picture on the Lactuca page it would be helpful if it was here too.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.95.0.108 (talk) 14:31, 2006 June 11 (UTC)
I agree. I've copied over the image from the Lactuca page into the taxa box.Silverthorn 14:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, they are bang on for the species. Unlobed leaves are more common. Plantsurfer 20:41, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: Article discusses plant resistance very thoroughly. The discussion of molecular markers and specific genes which confer resistance depending on isolates was very informative. Additional information about the inheritance of these traits for both resistance and virulence would be helpful in understand how they have evolved. I found an article which contains come of this information and seemed helpful if any further discussion of the gene linkage groups was to be added: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00226989#page-1. I used the article to add some additional information, but I think more could be taken from it by someone who has done more in depth research on this species. Article is also very easy to read and comprehend. Salenrs (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 02:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inheritance of resistance and virulence traits 

message: I have listed below the four references I am proposing for plant pathogen resistance in Lactuca serriola to mildew.
1) Beharav, A., Lewinsohn, D., Lebeda A., Nevo, E. 2006. New wild Lactuca genetic resources with resistance against Bremia lactucae. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53: 467–474.
2) Farrara, B. F., Ilot, T. W., Michelmore, R. W. 1987. Genetic analysis of factors for resistance to downy mildew Bremia lactucae in species of lettuce Lactuca sativa and L. serriola. Plant Pathology. 36: 499-514. 
3) Lebeda A., Sedlářová M., Petřivalský M., Prokopová J. 2008. Diversity of defence mechanisms in plant–oomycete interactions: a case study of Lactuca spp. and Bremia lactucae. 2008. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 122: 71-89.
4) Sicard, D., Woo, S. S., Arroyo-Garcia, R., Ochoa, O., Nguyen, D., Korol, A., Nevo, E., Michelmore, R. 1999. Molecular diversity at the major cluster of disease resistance genes in cultivated and wild Lactuca spp. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 99: 405-418.
Evolution43 (talk) 20:54, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional References
Talk:Arisa Uotani

message: I am proposing that this article be merged into List of Fruits Basket characters. If you have an opinion, please come over here. —Quasirandom (talk) 02:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Ayame Soma

message: Ayame Sohma is the older brother of Yuki and Kyou.
He rarely acts his age and is a very talkative, crazy and flirtatious character. Despite this he often surprises everyone with the things he notices. He is usually a very comical character and hardly ever acts seriously.
(124.185.12.227 05:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I am proposing that this article be merged into List of Fruits Basket characters. If you have an opinion, please come over here. —Quasirandom (talk) 02:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Jane Child

message: including a movie soundtracks
:Is she working on one movie soundtrack or multiple movie soundtracks? Cparker 14:56, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I propose this is merged into the artist's entry due to there being no content to warrant its own page under WP:MUSIC. Cloudz679 (talk) 12:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: The list of Child's equipment is almost impossible to read, particularly for those of us not familiar with some of that equipment.  Someone who knows their synths care to clear that up a bit? 75.66.145.31 (talk) 13:00, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Much better—my thanks! 75.66.145.31 (talk) 17:11, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need some clean-up! 

message: Hello - i've tried adding a link to a YouTube video that documents Jane's marriage to Cat Gray. However the Wikipedia bot decided that it was a breach of policy. How can I add it, as it proves Jane is indeed married and corrects the Personal Life section that was previously removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyclonicleo (talk • contribs) 00:33, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Adding a YouTube Link?
Talk:Getter Robo Armageddon

message: I can understand the split here - one is about the series itself, the other is about the titular robot itself.  There's a similar split with Mazinger Z.  Most super robot fans are obsessive enough to be able to write two whole articles like this.  I don't particularly support or oppose a merger without additional justification.  Snarfies 15:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Sunburn (Muse song)

message: Sunburn is now done, please add things that I've missed out. Xtrememachineuk 15:05, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sunburn (Muse Song)

message: Is there any reason why this isn't at "Sunburn (song)" instead of "Sunburn (Muse song)". There are no other songs called Sunburn. I will move the page if there are no objections. Mahahahaneapneap 21:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have moved the page Mahahahaneapneap 17:08, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The rock band Fuel has a song called "Sunburn" DrkBlueXG 01:02, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move page?

message: I've been bold and rated this as B-Class and High priority. If anyone has any objections feel free to edit - I'm not a WikiProject Songs member but I've read the criteria.M2Ys4U 21:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Songs

message: I think I heard it on the background of a top gear episode 86.15.154.73 (talk) 16:41, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Sunburn used on Top Gear?
Talk:Iron Bird

message: * SUPPORT - This is a total waste.  Snarfies 15:08, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: merger

message: There is a web page at http://www.airbus.com/innovation/proven-concepts/in-design/iron-bird/ that has a lot of helpful information about one of the possible meanings of the term Iron Bird.  
This URL could prove useful in the future, if / when there is a wikipedia article about that use of the term. Currently (June 2015) that use of the term is listed in the third entry of this disambig (disambiguation) page -- as "a type of aircraft test rig used in the development and testing of designs for a [new] aircraft". 
I do not have time to create a new article now, (for that meaning of the term "Iron Bird"). Also, there might be some question about whether such an article would be encyclopedic enough -- whether the meaning of the term is an idea that is notable enough, etc. However, if / when someone does start a wikipedia article about that, then this URL could prove useful. The web page it points to is a reliable source, and contains a lot of information. --Mike Schwartz (talk) 01:13, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good reference -- if there is ever an article in which to use it (e.g. in a footnote)
Talk:New Testament/2006

message: Non believers of the Bible tend to deface it & create bias comments.
:Wow; don't shout.  Feel free to work within Wikipedia's policies to bring about whatever changes to the article you believe are needed.
:It shouldn't be that big a deal, as it shouldn't be news to any Bible believer that non-believers don't believe it, and don't like it.  You act like you've never seen that before (assuming it is in the article). Jdavidb (talk • contribs) 18:33, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Twyford Church of England High School

message: There is reasonable suspicion based on the way some of the contents of this article have been written that members of the school/staff of current pupils may have made significant contributions to this article, a lot of the language is informal and reads as if it is of a billboard or the main website for the school (particularly the "Extracurricular activities" Section - which has now been removed.). 
This falls way below the standard for which Wikipedia would expect and therefore I am downgrading this article to "stub" level. Theprussian (talk) 00:00, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parts of this article may have been written by staff at the school.
Talk:Angel in Disguise (Brandy song)

message: if these are two completely different songs, this article should be separated to 2 articles. – Alensha 寫 词 15:10, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:History of science in the Islamic World

message: Article is good, but i feelt that the Historiography of Islamic science section needs a few pro-Islamic sience quotes to avoid being unbalanced. I dont have any such at hand, so ill settle with puting up a sign. Peace. --Striver 12:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you might find something of the sort you're looking for in the writings of S. H. Nasr, which I don't have at hand either.  Nasr argues that there is something in Islamic culture that conditions a particular approach to science, especially the interest in mathematics. A passage from his Science and Civilization in Islam that I used to use in teaching says "... one can already see why mathematics was to make such a strong appeal to the Muslim: its abstract nature furnished the bridge that Muslims were seeking between multiplicity and unity."  As I read Nasr, the Muslim monotheistic emphasis upon the divine one led them to a mathematical approach as they sought to understand the multiplicity of created nature.  --SteveMcCluskey 02:36, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I found it on the web, and added a quotation from Nasr.  I think I'll remove your template.  --SteveMcCluskey 02:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The neutrality template was restored at 13:35, 2 March 2007, by new editor , without any explanation on the talk page or in the history.  Lacking any justification for its presence, I'll remove the template.  --SteveMcCluskey 21:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

message: Discuss at Talk:Islamic science#Proposed merger--Sefringle 03:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge