lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of West Germanic languages

message: I'd like to change the following to dialects, not languages, but as it seems a big change I thought it would be polite to ask first if anyone had anything against it!
Frankish language 
Lower Silesian language 
Upper Saxon language 
Kölsch language 
Mainfränkisch language 
Pfaelzisch language 
Swabian language 
Low Alemannic 
Alemán Coloneiro (?)
Alsatian language 
Basel German 
High Alemannic 
Bernese German 
... and I think most of the rest...
Saintswithin 12:53, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: languages or dialects?

message: Considering that West Germanic languages has this information and more, this page seems sort of redundant.  I propose a merge.  Or a deletion. AEuSoes1 08:14, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Everett Turnpike

message: Oh no! Now you've given away the secret again! All the effort they spent changing all of those signs to remove any mention of the FAA so the terrorists couldn't find it will now be wasted!
Atlant 12:55, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Federal Aviation Administration at Exit 4 

message: :Central Turnpike was merged into this article a while back. To see what Central Turnpike (including its history), you can go to Talk:Everett Turnpike/Pre-merge history of Central Turnpike.--Commander Keane 06:00, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Central Turnpike

message: Does the edit I made about where route three breaks off from the turnpike need a source? I know it from  driving on it almost every day so I am a primary source.--Thomas Kane Nov. 8 2006 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.187.143.118 (talk) 07:20, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Route 3

message: I edited the toll information in the exit list to show that the E-ZPass discounts are just for New Hampshire-issued E-ZPasses.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.190.166.162 (talk) 20:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: E-ZPass
Talk:Dragoon (Final Fantasy)

message: High and Super Jump only remove enmity from the DRG, they do not transfer it to other party members or the wyvern as is said in the article. Just gonna fix that up.. feba 08:58, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  High/Super Jump Enmity 

message: I'd like to add Cyan Garamonde to the list of characters possibly inspired by the Dragon Knight job. I realize that he doesn't use spears and is more of a generic Knight than anything else, and also that FFVI doesn't have explicit character classes, but as a character he has some ties to Dragoons. His personality is somewhat in line with that of Freya or Kain--he fits the "aloof Knight" archetype that's obviously followed by Freya and Fratley, questionably followed by Kain (whose susceptibility to mind control tends to set him at odds with his friends in a way that really doesn't fit exactly with the archetype), and arguably followed by Kimahri and Cid (the former is silent, the latter hides beneath his gruff exterior). The thing that really tips it for me, at least, is Empowerer. I know it's silly to base this sort of classification on little more than one skill, but I'd at least like to mention that Cyan is FFVI's entry into that sort of archetype, in the same way that Locke is a Thief, Sabin is a Monk, and Mog is a Dancer, even if they're each not explicitly called such.
Wilson 6500 00:45, 29 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cyan Garamonde? 

message: Where is a dragon knight playable in X-2?  as far as i'm aware, there's no dressphere nor accessory that allows you to jump, or wield a spear.
*I'm not aware of a Dragoon dressphere either.  I'll change it. — warpedmirror (talk) 18:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dragon Knight in X-2? 

message: As per discussion at the Jobs sub-project of WPFF, this article will be merged into Final Fantasy character classes unless there is convincing argument to be made that it's notable enough for its own article. Most of the information on this page could be merged into the individual games' pages as well as the main character classes article. Please comment here or at the talk page for the project. -RaCha'ar 21:53, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Though I support some of the other ones, I think this one is notable enough to have its own article as so many Final Fantasy characters are classified as Dragon Knights. Geg 00:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree with Geg; while Bard, Beastmaster, and the like should be merged, the Dragon Knight page should stay. It's surely as notable a class as Red and Blue Mages. If anything, this page should be expanded and improved upon. 24.42.246.206 16:18, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: RaCha'ar, could you please remove the merge tag now that we're done the discussion on it? If someone like me removes it, someone will just revert it. 142.167.154.187 13:51, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoops, sorry about that.  :) -RaCha'ar 21:58, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Haemoglobin

message: Any info on this spelling? Is it now obsolete? By what authority? i.e. UPAC etc. ? Can any one help? --Dan|(talk) 13:21, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Category talk:Wikipedia requested articles

message: Many would hold various thoughts and theories about what leadership is and how one can develop to become one.Sadly theorists dispute the two leadership aspects;
1. leadership is inborn- possibly this has been captured from some qualities and characters exhibited by some leaders and not not observed in others.Many would agree that leadership can be acquired but it would not be as much effective as compared to the inborn one.NOTE; this mostly associated with bloodline in ones family.
2.Acquired leadership- its also true that a person can be trained and can turn out to be an effective leader.hence its ideal to incorporate the two aspects  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lumumba Kimani Frank (talk • contribs) 12:45, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  NATURE AND CHARACTER OF LEADERS; 

message: 197.231.200.14 (talk) 22:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: as you have not requested a change. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 22:12, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  phonerotica
Talk:Julia Louis-Dreyfus

message: The Revision as of 14:52, Thu 02 Feb 23 inserted the (boldface) word “Mazukmaru” between the title “Hannah and Her Sisters” and its date (1986). I am moderately suspicious that this is a simple inadvertent paste error, but not confident enough that this was not supposed to be a different movie, or the name of her character in H&HS to change this myself.
Sbauman (talk) 05:25, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Pate error?

message: I just heard Julia on a podcast talking about how many errors there are in her Wikipedia page. She states her name is Julia Scarlet E Louis-Dreyfus and that the E references an Elizabeth but it’s never been her name. 
This seems like a major change, but it’s on Dax Shepard’s podcast Armchair Expert June 17, 2019. Indiecred (talk) 02:24, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately a great number of reliable sources say it's Elizabeth, and what she may have jokingly said in a podcast doesn't over-rule that. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 20:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it does. If she says her name isn't Elizabeth then her name isn't Elizabeth, stop gate keeping. She also said in a Vanity Fair that it's E and not Elizabeth.  67.140.232.183 (talk) 04:29, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not quite, her name is in doubt only her official name in papers (passport, birth certificate, etc).--Kmhkmh (talk) 14:45, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Julia’s statement of incorrect wiki entries 

message: This Wiki says that she way on Seinfeld from 1989 ... nope....she wasn't yet on the show until 1990.  The pilot episode was on in 1989 (there was only one episode in 1989)....and she was not on that show.
How DARE they! Ratio strain (talk) 02:41, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure who "they" refers to :-), but I took the liberty to fix it.--Kmhkmh (talk) 14:50, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seinfeld 1990 NOT 1989 

message: From Siri on an iPhone
Knowledge under Wikipedia:
Under Charles Louise Dreyfus shows the Louis Dreyfus group as 
1970 - 1929, it should read 1870 - 1929, it’s correct on the Wiki web site, but when you use Siri, and when asked about Julie Louise Dreyfus, and go up her family tree, the the great leaders of the Louis-Dreyfus group & family:
Gérard Louis Dreyfus, (Father)
Pierre Louis Dreyfus, (GF)
Charles Louis Dreyfus *,(GGF)
 
*again 1970 should read 1870 for Louis Dreyfus group on Charles’s page.
And of course it founder the great
Leopold Louis Dreyfus, (GGGF) her great great grandfather was 
Founder of Louis Dreyfus group and patriarch of the Louis Dreyfus family.
I have respect for Louis Dreyfus, and want to correct the dates. Tonyshouse (talk) 11:42, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Respect: Julia Louis Dreyfus Tonyshouse (talk) 11:49, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louis Dreyfus group  Charles
Talk:Third rail (politics)

message: It's a good article so far.  People say Social Security's the "third rail" in American politics, but is that true?  Has contemplating Social Security changes really been political suicide for certain officials, or has it just exposed them to a certain amount of backlash?  Greenspan proposed changes in the early '80's and Reagan signed them into law and neither of them suffered too much for it, so did anyone else take the fall?  Maybe there could be an example of a name of someone who did? Uyanga 14:00, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Various

message: I motion agricultural subsidies as an entry in Third rail of politics. No politician wants to see be blamed for increasing food prices. CHECK YOUR CITATIONS! (talk) 11:03, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Agricultural Subsidies

message: I suggest gun politics should be disqualified as a "third rail" issue. It is in no way a bipartisan issue. It is openly debated and gun control legislation exists in all states in the US. CHECK YOUR CITATIONS! (talk) 11:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: What are these standards of which you speak?Two kinds of porkMakin'Bacon 15:15, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Every source claiming Israel's "special relationship" with America is a third rail is dismissed as an unreliable source so let us look into the sources how "gun politics" is a third rail issue. I will soon act accordingly with these edits. CHECK YOUR CITATIONS! (talk) 05:59, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Gun control/Gun rights

message: As far as I can see, this article is sourced solely to material providing examples of the metaphor being used, and lacks any sources providing discussion of the metaphor itself. Accordingly, it seems questionable that the subject matter (the metaphor) meets Wikipedia notability guidelines. AndyTheGrump (talk) 19:51, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Kill it! InedibleHulk (talk) 21:37, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, to make matters worse, the UK examples all appear to be US sources using the metaphor to discuss UK issues. Surprise, surprise, Americans use US metaphors when discussing non-American matters! Who would have guessed it? Pincrete (talk) 14:33, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does Wikipedia have an article about a metaphor, sourced solely to examples of usage? 

message: Added a controversial item (back) in. As per my note, the issue is not whether a topic *is* toxic, but that there is usage of it being expressly described as "third rail". Snori (talk) 20:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Tidy
Talk:Josif Rajačić

message: Which is this "Lucani" in Croatia? All I can see is a place called Lučani in central Serbia... --Joy [shallot] 1 July 2005 01:43 (UTC)
*My historic book say that he was born in Lučani in Croatia. Also according to Auto Atlas of Former Yugoslavia place named Lučani exist only in Central Serbia, so you are right about that. Maybe some village in Croatia was named Lučani in the past, and now have different name? User:PANONIAN
:: Found it now on the Croatian Bureau of Statistics web site - after 1948 it was called Lučane, then by 1981 it was abandoned which in turn refers to the fact that in 1991 it was listed as non-existent and instead attached to Brinje. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 22:28, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: birthplace

message: I wonder why isn't it mentioned that he was an Orthodox Bishop of Dalmatia in the 1820s? --HolyRomanEmperor 19:36, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dalmatia

message: Most of this is not the truth, he rulled as an dictator and put away all of his opponents. -- Imbris 04:35, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What exactly is not truth? PANONIAN (talk) 11:21, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: dictator

message: Patriarch Josif Rajacic received an Austrian title of baron with predicate "Brinski" April 18. 1861.
See: Gudenus János: A magyarországi főnemesség, Budapest 1998
and Ferenczy Zoltán: Hungarian Aristocracy: http://ferenczygen.tripod.com/id6.html
:Fine, but baron title is less important than his other titles - Serbian patriarch and administrator of Vojvodina, so it cannot be first. PANONIAN 07:17, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Baron
Talk:Hinton train collision

message: Were the tracks oriented east-west or north-south, and would this have made the signals susceptable to glare?
Does the conductor in the caboose have a speedometer, or does he have to rely on seat-of-the-pants guesswork to determine if an overspeed is occuring?
Signals goes back to red as the engine passes them, and the conductor 1866m behind would probably find it difficult to read these signals when still yellow or green (and apply the brakes if an overshoot is occurring).  The relevant rule probably hasn't been altered since the time that trains were much shorter.
BTW, a reference to a red signal might actually means a red/red/red signal, while a reference to a green signal might mean a red/green/red signal.
Tabletop (talk) 10:08, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sun and glare 

message: While conducting research into the crash, I noticed that the large sections of this article which lack references have actually been sourced (mainly copied), from the town of Hinton's website, a link to which I have included in the new External Links section.  As of right now I have no time to spare to rewrite and re-cite those sections, but will try to complete that soon.  Any help on this would be greatly appreciated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.110.39.2 (talk) 01:58, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Similarity to Hinton, AB's page on the Crash 

message: In this sentence "On the passenger train, one coach was crushed by a freight car after it was thrown into the air by the force of the collision, killing one of its occupants." the words "it" and "its" are ambiguous. I think "it" is the freight car and "its" is the coach but I'm not sure. If so, it could be reworded to remove the ambiguity, for example "On the passenger train, one coach was crushed, killing one of its occupants, by a freight car which had been thrown into the air by the force of the collision." ☺Coppertwig (talk) 18:47, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slight ambiguity 

message: @AGOLFR: Are you sure that the TV episode you described isn't just a repackaged version of the 2005 episode of Mayday? Air Disasters is one of the names Mayday goes under in some countries. Indefatigable (talk) 21:31, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, it is a possibility that this is a repackaged version. I am unable to confirm since I have not seen the 'Mayday' 2005 release version. 2601:182:B82:9170:0:0:0:7D42 (talk) 16:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  TV series 'Air Disasters' in 2021
Talk:Lorenz gauge condition

message: The standard name is 'Lorentz gauge'. That Wikipedia of all places would have the name wrong is completely ridiculous. Whatever controversy there is over attribution can be included in a section of the article. You can't just unilaterally change the accepted name of a standard concept in physics--if everyone did this, science would descend into incomprehensible babel. JKeck (talk) 17:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I pretty sure my copy of Jackson's book (3d ed?) uses "Lorenz" (with a ref. to an OP), and, as I recall, he points out that it is Lorenz, not Lorentz. YohanN7 (talk) 11:10, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Standardize the title, but include discussion of whatever controversy
Talk:Prunus salicina

message: Since this plant is originally from China, you might talk to the folks at the Wikipedia:China-related topics notice board to get the Chinese name, etc. Also, it looks like the German Wikipedia has a couple of more nice photos (see ). Finally, I looked through a couple of my reference books on Japanese poetry, but couldn't find any examples of the use of Sumomo in Japanese poetry. I would assume that it is used both as a subject of waka (tanka), and as a kigo for renga and haiku, but that's just my guess. If you know more, you should probably add it to the article. BlankVerse ∅ 14:28, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: Why reduce the font size of the subheadings?  I don't think that looks good.  Badagnani 23:42, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subheadings 

message: The Japanese plum is yellow. This red/purple plum is just Chinese.--174.22.217.220 (talk) 08:03, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese Plum Claim Is Incorrect
Talk:Commoditization

message: Just curious, shouldn't it be Commodification, with a "c"?
No. Commoditization and commodification are totally different concepts. Commoditization is what is defined in this article. Commodification is a Marxist term that means making something for sale rather than for personal use.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.29.168.156 (talk) 12:10, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

message: I'm not sure what Rushkoff's blog adds here.  Fortunately, his point of view about brand specificity is not reflected in this article--nor should it be.  The wiki page seems fine, and its description of commodification competent.
It might useful to add that the difference between a) commoditization and b) commodification has to do with value of things versus the things themselves.  Commoditization is the process by which *the values* of things (goods, services) *change* in kind (not only degree) so they are treated as commensurable within a monetary or exchange framework.  Commodification is the process by which goods or services enter the monetary or exchange framework.  They ultimately have to do with roughly the same situation, but commoditize has to do with the changing of values of things into a marketable metric.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.23.238 (talk) 18:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Commoditization vs. Commodification 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians!
I found a section in the article on Commodification that was actually about Commoditization, so I moved the three paragraphs of it that would not be redundant to this article. (See the discussion on Talk:Commodification.Nikolaj1905 (talk) 05:47, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I moved some material
Template talk:Sri Aurobindo

message: Wow — nice job, Alan. I like the colors. I'm going to have to check out some of these articles.  --goethean ॐ  14:40, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why does someone keep editing off mention of Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet as an important disciple of Sri Aurobindo. She has written perhaps more than any of the others mentioned on the topic of Sri Aurobindo and the Supramental yoga. Just because one does not agree with her yoga and its conclusions, does not give anyone the right to consistently delete her from mention as an important disciple on this template ... or the right to deny any mention of Aeon Center of Cosmology as a community of students of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother, who also happen to recognize the contributions of Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet ... as well as the mention of Aeon Group as a international forum of students of Sri Aurobindo and the Mother, who also happen to recognize the contributions of Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet ...  Whoever is making these deletions, please refrain from trying to monopolize this template based on your own preferences regarding the matter ... which you seem to have been doing for quite some time now. If it continues I will have to lodge a complaint to the wiki board. You have no valid basis for editing Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet or Aeon Group off the template. A NON PARTIAL POINT OF VIEW (wikipedia policy) demands that one does not edit out true and valid information based on one's own dogma. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.7.14.18 (talk) 21:56, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleting mention of Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet, Aeon Center for Cosmology and Aeon Group:
Talk:Mango (Saturday Night Live)

message: Is there an LGBT-related category that should be applied here? ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:19, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the suggestion, and your helpful contributions. Added one. Right cite (talk) 15:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: , I'm torn. The article text suggests the character is "not gay" but also there's some context here which suggests inclusion of some category... ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:05, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: He shares attractions or entices or attempts to seduce those of all sexes and persuasions, more like pansexuality. Right cite (talk) 16:07, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  LGBT? 

message: :The citation style has nothing to do with the bloated citations filling the page with unnecessarily long or explanatory entries that are not even close to sub-titles. There needs to be some serious trimming to remove these bloated citations. Subtitles, typically denoted by a colon, might be sometimes longer but including content found under the citation title is not needed. Short necessary notes are one thing but including chapter excerpts or full blown multiple sentence paragraphs should be included in the article or, if deemed important, in a notes section.  Otr500 (talk) 15:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay this is now done. Right cite (talk) 15:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations