Talk:Roland V-Drums

message: I think this is a good article that, based on the significance and popularity of the subject, has the potential to be a GREAT article.
I'm going to tighten up some of the copy, perhaps elucidate some technical terms.
Here's what I'd like some assistance on:
#This article deserves at least one picture. I'm not yet proficient enough at WikiP editing to acquire and insert a picture. Suffice to say, there has got to be a truckload of highly illustrative pictures (probably mostly promo-use pics courtesy of Roland, also some pics of V-drum kits in use by famous artists). V Drums deserve to be SEEN as well as heard. : )
--
ManfrenjenStJohn 20:44, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grace Notes: How this article can be improved 

message: Some parts of the article read like a Roland advertisement. I have used the V-Drums, and I can confirm that what is said in the article is true, but some parts seem like an advertisement.
Thoughts?
--Thatguykalem (talk) 02:05, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It might have been cleaned up some. There's still a stray sentence here or there. This article would be much more complete if the various features were mentioned in context of how they compare to competitors' features, and if there were more discussion of how these fit into the industry as a whole. It's as though the article ignores that there are any other electronic drums at all, and that's a subtle NPOV issue. Also, there just have to be more references, and they have to come from places other than Roland literature. There are a lot of articles in magazines such as Modern Drummer that would make good sources. Dementia13 (talk) 04:08, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reads like an advertisement 

message: The TD-6 is listed in both the "High-end V-Drum Kits" and "Less Expensive V-Drum Kits". 
I'm not sure which is correct.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.155.33.1 (talk) 20:03, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TD-6 

message: Not sure if this is the correct way to discuss, but instead of just editing details of one module (& ignoring others), I thought I'd first ask here:
The TD-1 is specified as having *9* inputs, although it has 10. The kick is specified separately for some modules ("n (+ Kick)"); I'm sure there's a reason to specify it separately, but I wonder why? Should the same be done for the TD-1?
The inputs are as follows:
* nine are used out-of-the-box in the TD-1K(V) drum kits that are sold as sets
* one additional stereo (I believe it's a piezo/switch as it is for another cymbal)
which are of the following types:
* 5 mono
** tom 1
** tom 2
** tom 3
** hi-hat pedal
** kick-drum pedal
* 4 stereo (piezo/switch - I only assume, as that's what's currently specified on this page, didn't confirm the exact stereo type)
** cymbal 1 (crash)
** cymbal 2 (ride)
** cymbal 3 (optional crash)
** hi-hat
* 1 stereo (piezo/piezo - I only assume, as that's what's currently specified on this page, didn't confirm the exact stereo type)
** snare
Thanks!
--
987654321boom (talk) 06:01, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drum Modules > TD-1: Inputs Incorrect 

message: Not sure if this is properly placed but what happened to all the tables of modules, pads, cymbals, etc?  There has been a major edit to the page.  It's not half of what it was. Cowhow (talk) 00:08, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Same question, that was an increadibly useful chart that I visited dozens of times, there is no reason to remove such relevan and useful information that was here since forever! What happened? 76.101.182.102 (talk) 20:09, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Bring back the charts!  This was so great, I cannot understand why it has been removed.  Tons of information that I cannot find anywhere.  Bring back the charts! 142.127.114.178 (talk) 20:36, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

text: Agreed!  I use the pad chart often as a reference - and now I come back a week or two later and its gone. WTH? Escher 2 (talk) 04:18, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Well... So I read the revision log... and it appears that the Mods here are on a vendetta.  Escher 2 (talk) 04:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

text: I see the info for modules has been readded which is great.  This page has always been a concise clearinghouse for Roland product info.  I followed @Escher 2Escher2 and read logs. I see where protection was requested (and denied) for this article.  I think protection would be appropriate since what was removed was relevant information, not promoting Roland and, hence, it's not a catalog of Roland products. Can I get the same info from Roland's website, sure but it would take me more time than I have to assimilate it. I can do without these destructive edits. Cowhow (talk) 18:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major Edits