Talk:Parliament (cigarette)

message: Is it necessary to have the link to the list of additives in cigarettes in the see also section? It implies a bias, and though it's relevant to the tobacco page or cigarette page, it doesn't contribute anything relevant to a page on a specific brand of cigarettes. Yamahasixstring (talk) 20:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  (no header) 

message: As a lifelong Parliament smoker, I wish I didn't have to do that... but the recessed filter theories really need sources, and I can't find any. :( All I know is that I love them; they've totally spoiled me for other cigarettes. Doc Sigma (wait, what?) 13:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Citation added. If you do a search in the article for "Parliament" you will come across the following lines: "In the same year, 1970, Parliament cigarettes of Philip Morris, Inc (80, 85, and 100 mm length) were tested. The Parliament cigarette was unique in that it had a 5 mm recessed charcoal filter. The novel filter was designed to prevent the tongue from touching the filter face. However, tests revealed that the filter of Parliament cigarettes released carbon particles that ranged in size from 5–120 µm." --Old american century 04:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added [[Template:unsourced]] to recessed filter section 

message: :Image:PARLIAMENT.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 01:00, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:PARLIAMENT.jpg

message: In this article there was a claim that Parliaments are forbidden in Europe. I find no source or citation for that, so the sentence has been removed. Someone can add it back when he/she finds a reliable source. It is simply implausible that a whole continent forbids a single brand of cigarettes. Wandering Courier (talk) 02:26, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Forbidden in Europe 

message: I'm living in Tennessee And they don't offer at any store in Murfreesboro Tennessee 174.235.82.66 (talk) 06:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are these cigarette sold as High volume  offer in many stores in Tennessee Genesee county michigan