lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Louis-Gabriel Suchet

message: These were currently spamming the bottom of the article, creating the illusion that it was up to date and well referenced when it is mostly just an EB crib. 
* Bukhari, Emir Napoleon's Marshals Osprey Publishing, 1979, .
* Chandler, David Napoleon's Marshals Macmillan Pub Co, 1987, .
* Connelly, Owen, Blundering to Glory: Napoleon's Military Campaigns SR Books, 1999, .
* Elting, John R. Swords Around a Throne: Napoleon's Grande Armée  Weidenfeld & Nicholson, 1997, .
* Haythornthwaite, Philip Napoleon's Commanders (2): c.1809-15 Osprey Publishing, 2002, .
* Humble, Richard Napoleon's Peninsular marshals: A reassessment Taplinger Pub., 1975, .
* Linck, Tony Napoleon's Generals Combined Publishing, 1994,  .
* Macdonell, A. G. Napoleon and His Marshals Prion, 1997,  .
* C.H. Barault-Roullon, Le Maréchal Suchet (Paris, 1854); *Choumara, Considérations militaires sur les mémoires du Maréchal Suchet (Paris, 1840), a controversial work on the last events of the Peninsular War, inspired, it is supposed, by Soult
* Lieutenant-General Lamarque's obituary notice in the Spectateur militaire (1826).
* Alexander, Don W. Rod of Iron: French Counterinsurgency Policy in Aragon During the Peninsular War (SR Books, 1985) .
Kindly restore them as they are used to expand the article and to verify statements in the running text. — LlywelynII 08:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for future article expansion
Talk:Aimable Pélissier

message: The massacre of the Ouled Riah deserves greater detail, probably an article of its own. For someone interested in writing on this, here is what looks like a good reference: https://www.academia.edu/3657137/Dahra_and_the_History_of_Violence_in_early_Colonial_AlgeriaBill (talk) 21:42, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Ouled Riah
Talk:Louis Joseph, Duke of Vendôme

message: I want to move this article to Louis Joseph de Bourbon, duc de Vendôme because I believe that was his complete name as his father was Louis II de Bourbon and Louis Joseph wasn't a bastard. The German wikipedia uses this name. Carl Logan 11:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing as there hasn't been a public outcry, I have changed the name. Carl Logan 16:48, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: My first impulse on reading this article is that it was written by a relative: it's in serious need of a more neutral rewrite.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.11.246.100 (talk) 04:22, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overly Flattering
Talk:Extended X-ray absorption fine structure

message: A few-sentence discussion of the theory of EXAFS and a figure illustrating what the data looks like would do wonders for this article.     Alison Chaiken 04:25, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I will admit to some bias, as EXAFS is my specialty, but does it really rate as only "low" importance in the Spectroscopy project? Low importance is defined as "subject is peripheral knowledge, possible trivial," with the tip that "most likely you will not recognize the subject."
I would be fairly shocked if a printed encyclopedia of spectroscopy did not include an entry on EXAFS. 
I propose it be changed to "mid" importance for Spectroscopy. This would place it on par with Auger electron spectroscopy, NEXAFS, surfaced enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and XANES.SarahLawrence Scott (talk) 20:39, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Seconded. EXAFS is equally as relevant as NEXAFS/XANES and XRF.Memcbr (talk) 06:48, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Yikkayaya (talk) 13:27, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance
Talk:English and Welsh bastardy laws

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved to alternate title (English and Welsh bastardy laws) to disambiguate from Colonial American bastardy laws (non-admin closure)  ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 10:00, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Bastard (law of England and Wales) →  – Although the term is specific to English and Welsh law, there are no other legal terms from which to disambiguate. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  I actually wasn't thinking that specifically. (I only meant to enquire as to whether you agree with my [and the other commenter's] inclination that the original proposal seems to just move this article to an ambiguous title. I hadn't thought much beyond that.) But I could definitely imagine a broad-concept article working at the title Bastard (law). And I think moving this article to a title in line with the colonial American one makes sense. What do you think? Graham (talk) 07:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:06, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm inclined to support a move to English and Welsh bastardy laws, in that case. Graham (talk) 05:47, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 22 January 2023
Talk:On Being Sane in Insane Places

message: There is a description of this experiment at Rosenhan experiment. The page On being sane in insane places (same title except for caps) already redirects to Rosenhan.  Merging would involve either just blanking this page and posting a redirect, which would be a shame to the people who worked on it, or finding some way to edit them together, and I don't know the field well enough to do it justice.  Anyone else want to try? Thatcher131 04:29, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Young Eagles

message: There should be a separate page for the GOP group of the same name that gave money to a night club, and it should be mentioned that this isn't that group on this article's page. I do not know how to do this. 76.11.0.182 (talk) 10:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Basically if that article is written then disambiguation links can be put on both pages. - Ahunt (talk) 12:58, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Republican fundraising group
Talk:Star Wars Episode I: Racer

message: If I recall correctly, Sebulba's pod had the flamethrower in the N64 version too.  Can anyone confirm this for me?  Colonelx 13:22, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Selbulba's Flamethrower

message: I dispute the claim that only one music track plays on the N64's port during final laps. I think there are actually three or four, but I know there is more than one. Sheavsey33 (talk) 01:13, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: N64 port

message: There is no verifiable source for the 3.12 million sold copies. --92.77.10.28 (talk) 02:32, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Source for sales

message: *InQuest Gamer #52https://archive.org/details/IQ.Gamer.Partial.Collection/inquest.052.-.aug.1999.-.urza%27s.destiny/page/n65/mode/2up
8.37.179.254 (talk) 15:22, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews
Talk:Geethanjali (1989 film)

message: While Geethanjali is the correct transliteration from the Bangla name, Tagore himself used a Gitanjali for the English name. Tagore was awarded nobel prize for the English language translation, named Gitanjali . So, this article should be moved to Gitanjali. Thanks. --Ragib 04:42, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Ok. So I will do the move according to the discussion.
Geetaanjali → Geethanjali (1989 film)
Create dab Geetanjali (disambiguation) (I think the spelling is Geetanjali instead of Geetaanjali) 
Redirect Geetaanjali → Geetanjali (disambiguation)
Sumanch (talk) 00:27, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Action
Talk:Conditional preservation of the saints

message: I just added Template:Very long section to the "Biblical support" section. I see the discussion from last year, which explains (I think) why so much of the text is in the article body rather than in footnotes. But s comments from that discussion are still relevant - we should replace the long paragraphs of quotation with encyclopedic prose that summarizes the arguments made for this position, with references to the relevant Biblical passages and theological/scholarly sources. Ideally this process will also help to focus the section on the most notable passages/arguments on this topic - I don't know which those are, and the fact that at the moment this section has, e.g., almost 8,000 words on the Epistle to the Hebrews alone, the vast majority of which are quotations, makes it difficult to come away from the article with a good understanding of which the salient points are. --Opus 113 (talk) 08:57, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length/structure of "Biblical support" section
Talk:Tanis Diena

message: I can't believe wiki anymore.  What is truth?
:I dunno, sounds plausible to me. I mean, you think pigs are not so important today, but believe it or not, ham, pork, and bacon all come from this miraculous animal! Not to mention scrapple and trotters. Anybody know any good songs glorifying the fertility of pigs that we can link to here?BillFlis 12:42, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh here, I found one: http://homepage.mac.com/danielbatty/notes/SongOfPig.html  BillFlis 12:53, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Bart the Mother

message: No telling of the reason that this is Phil Hartman's last apperance on Simpsons? Or the episode being dedicated to him(as is mentioned on his page)? Seems disrespectful... 65.96.98.74 05:00, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: June 2006
Talk:Creid

message: Saw that someone changed 'Stairs of Light' to 'Stars of Light' and 'October Mermaid' to 'June Mermaid'
Original track name in Japanese: 光の階段 (Hikari no Kaidan) which translates to 'Stairs of Light'. I changed it back.
Original track name in Japanese: 神無月の人魚 (Kaminatsuki no Ninkyo). Kaminatsuki one of the old Japanese names for October but I've always seen this track translated as June Mermaid. The old Japanese name for June is 水無月 so it may be plausible that someone screwed up the translation way back and it stuck. Are there any official English translations for any of the Xenogears albums? Changing it back to October Mermaid, which is used in other Wikipedia articles.
24.195.129.34 00:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese title translations 
Talk:Wangfujing

message: Most of the article talks about the protests. This is a disgrace to the long history of the place. More general information should be included. --92.74.65.61 (talk) 20:37, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protests 

message: the snack street and Tourism shop street is closed. Forever. 109.43.51.13 (talk) 13:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Snack street is closed
Talk:Emmie Chanika

message: I came across this page via random article.  I think it would benefit from some cleanup attention from someone who knows something about Chanika.
Mark5677 05:08, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup required

message: Malawian Human rights activist. AutumnBEA (talk) 18:34, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emmie Chanika
Talk:Chad Ford

message: A note regarding sources from the creator of this article:
I can’t find the NY Post article online anymore where Peter Vescey referred to Chad Ford as “Chad Fraud”, but it did happen, and someone who does a little more investigating would be able to confirm this.  If you do a search on Yahoo! for “Peter Vescey” and “Chad Fraud”, you’ll come across a few websites that make reference to when Vescey referred to Ford as such, so I’ll use that as proof that this incident did occur.  Beisnj 05:18, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding my last edit, I fixed some grammar and added the Peter Vescey comment.  Again, a search online easily backs up this statement.  Furthermore, the person who edited this article and removed the comment has only made one edit at Wikipedia, and it was to the Chad Ford article.  It almost leads me to believe that the editor was Chad Ford himself, a friend of Ford's, or a biased admirer of Ford's.  Beisnj 07:16, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source on Vescey comment

message: I have removed this paragraph. It was based on a blog comment and an opinion piece, and also suffered from original research. If there is valid criticism of Ford then it will need to be properly sourced. Kevin (talk) 22:52, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism paragraph  
Talk:Acid salt

message: Sodium bicarbonate?  The article says that "acid salts" have acidic properties, but sodium bicarbonate (baking soda) is a weak base.
: Good catch Mr. Anonymous. I reverted the changes. It looks like whoever edited the chemical names does not know how to read formulas or was enganged in some subtle vandalism. It is possible they assumed that since Baking powder contains an acid salt that Baking soda was the Acid Salt. (rather than being the base in the mix) --Darkfred Talk to me 23:35, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  This is an old discussion, but I want to leave a note. Actually, the person you reverted did not read formulas wrong. The names you removed are correct (older) names that are more commonly used. "... hydrogen carbonate" is just a recently-made IUPAC recommended name for bicarbonate. You can see that the sodium bicarbonate article is still named "sodium bicarbonate". Same with sodium bisulfate, etc. I put the links back in without changing the names. And sodium bicarbonate (or sodium hydrogen carbonate if you prefer) is indeed baking soda, which is basic; and which is also an acid salt. This is not inconsistent; acid salts are not necessarily acidic. --Spoon! 06:20, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, this is a very poorly written article. Whoever wrote it seems to have a general understanding of many things, but a precise understanding of comparatively little. I made a couple of small changes but do not feel like rewriting the whole thing, which should be done. -66.41.19.135 (talk) 23:08, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Acid salts

message: Parts of this are taken verbatim from  and needs to be referenced as such.  There are also inaccuracies on this page: only a strong acid and a strong base will give a neutral salt.  Olin 15:37, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: hmm, but simply stating it this way is also a bit misleading as well, since adding a hydrogen or hydroxide ion to the mix ruins the neutrality. And said ion could still be neutralized in the case of a strong acid and a weak base etc. If you can say it better go for it. I just said usually and linked to Acid and Salts (which should explain it, although I haven't checked). This article is still a stub IMHO and i am not an expert so really don't fell confident in extending it myself much further. --Darkfred Talk to me 21:38, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  references 

message: What is a high-temperature and a low-temperature salt? Olin 20:36, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a bit of explanation for those terms.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:46, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  high-temperature salt 

message: I did edited the style of language used and make it sounds less like an essay. If there is still anything inappropriate and should be changed, I am welcome for any suggestion. thank youSiriluk Wongkusonlert (talk) 07:31, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  problem with language

message: are you fine 103.174.169.63 (talk) 14:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  How are you
Talk:1998 MTV Movie Awards

message: A vast majority of the nominations need to be in the page for the 1998 MTV Movie Awards.  Who ever contributed to this particular page is confusing the year that the show was televised with year (i.e. the year prior) that the movies were released.User:TMC1982
There doesn't seem to be a MTV Movie Awards 1997, and a duplicate for the 2002 MTV Movie Awards (what is shown for 2001 is really for 2002). All the pages between 1997 and 2002 are off.
:I have moved them all, please create the 1997 page now. -- Kim van der Linde at venus 03:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, this one was okay, except for the host (which I've fixed), but 1999 and 2000, at least, are still off... —Steve Summit (talk) 17:02, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  (Update: 1999, 2000, and 2001 are now fixed, but 1997 is still broken. —Steve Summit (talk) 18:51, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ian

message: ian maxtone-graham is not a fictional character
:Yes, he is.  Played by Eric Idle.  Dismas|(talk) 22:40, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ian Maxtone-Graham

message: I'm not a native English speaker and I never know - what is the correct pronounciation of "Ian"? (I've heard like 3 versions...) thanx...
:The pronounciation is E-in for Ian Anderson, Ian Fleming, Ian McDiarmid, Ian McKellen, and Ian Holm.  As far as I know, this is the "correct" way to say it.  The only other way that I've heard is I-an and the only person I've heard of pronouncing it this way is Ian Ziering.  Dismas|(talk) 13:50, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronounciation

message: I moved the page cause i thought it seemed a bit one sided having just 'Ian' as the title.--Sparhelda 00:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest moving back to Ian as per MOS:NAME. We should decide which is the most common name and have other names redirecting there. --Yury Petrachenko 12:54, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: People could always start using old Roman names like 'Octavian' for their children and begin the trend of calling them "Ian" for short. That'd make things interesting by diversifying the variant etymologies. 67.5.156.47 (talk) 09:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Short for Octavian 

message: Doesn't seem to be related, but I'm too new at this to feel comfortable axing it myself.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:280:4F80:4DCC:E51E:8EA3:7460:42D6 (talk) 01:03, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Jackson
Talk:Supreme Court Act

message: Would somebody please provide a list of the CITATIONS of all Supreme Court Acts and revisions since 1875?  There would be under a dozen, maybe under ten.  It would be nice to have them, as they are each different, and each one relates directly to the cases of the Supreme Court of Canada online at LEXUM.  Reading those older cases without benefit of the Supreme Court Act of the day is a very deficient approach to information on precedents and case law.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.52.13.177 (talk) 17:30, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ole Christian Bach

message: Hm... "renowned" may be a somewhat questionable choice of adjective for describing Mr Bach; since he's been convicted for his activities, something like infamous would seem more appropriate. Anyway, this whole last sentence here - "He was renowned for working closely with leading financiers in Norway, such as Roger Sebastian Sedal." - might seem to be some kind of practical joke. I just searched google for "Roger Sebastian Sedal" and got only one hit (this article), which is why I'll delete the whole sentence. If someone would like to revert it, please cite a source for this mysterious Mr Sedal.
ReidarM 05:41, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mount Lu

message: Wikipedia zh White Deer Academy gives Li You (李游) instead of Li Po as the "white deer man" 218.166.89.8 05:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I can't find a single reference in English that mentions someone called Li You, but there are dozens that mention Li Po/Li Bo/Li Bai. If you can find something definitive, we can fix it, but maybe actually zh: is wrong? pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What does the Iran earthquake have to do with this? Surely Lushan is far enough from Iran that it was not affected... LordAmeth (talk) 07:24, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iran? 

message: Since ngram does not show which is the widely used English name, and the names used in the papers are different, there is no universally referenced name, the mountain needs to be named in Pinyin according to the naming method in the wiki. In this case, Pinyin is Lushan. 203.17.215.26 (talk) 03:12, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rfc on concerns raised on the current title of Mount Lu violates [[WP:NCCHINA]]
Talk:Sentences of Sextus

message: I think its inaccurate to label this New Testament Apocrypha. Yes, it was found in the Nag Hammadi texts, and it was cited by Church Fathers... but its a non-Christian text and being in the NHL doesn't make it Gnostic any more than Plato's cave parable being in the NHL makes Plato a Gnostic. Its rather a text popular in the wider culture of the time, and used by non-Christians as well as Christians and Gnostics. I think that disqualifies it as being New Testament Apocrypha. Also, this article needs to mention all the various copies of Sextus known before the Nag Hammadi version was found. It had been known before from versions in many languages, Syriac, Armenian, Latin, and its original Greek. Murple 06:03, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've found a couple of scholarly sources on the Sentences, so it might be possible to expand the article.Graham1973 (talk) 01:22, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Gnostic?
Talk:Highway 101

message: While revising this article to remove a lot of redundant links, I noticed too many uses of words like "good" and "interesting." Normally I would commend someone for significantly developing this article, but it seems to have turned into a critique of the band and its songs/albums, which would violate Wikipedia's "neutral point of view" policy. Thus I have added the NPOV tag to the top. Roxtar 06:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I would like to redirect Highway 101 to a disambig page, essentially List of highways numbered 101 (plus this band, of course).  It seems counterintuitive that most people typing in "Highway 101" would be searching for the band rather than a major autoroute. fishhead64 (talk) 20:20, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shouldn't this redirect?