Talk:Adolf Hitler/Archive 39

message: I have created three sandbox versions, Talk:Adolf Hitler/Hitler's religious beliefs, Talk:Adolf Hitler/Hitler's religious beliefs version 1, Talk:Adolf Hitler/Hitler's religious beliefs version 2 for us to use in dispute resolution. Drogo Underburrow 23:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Marksman, why don't you go to the first sandbox and re-write it to the length you  feel is appropriate? Drogo Underburrow 19:22, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Colonel, some of the quotes I find useful too, but they need to be integrated in a meaningful way into the text (as IMHO “my” version did) and we don’t need all of them (some of them are quite redundant) Did you have a look at one of my earlier versions? Str1977 (smile back) 22:38, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Sandbox Versions

message: I've froked this (disputed and too large) section from article by creating new one. Now you can delete or short this section and unprotect the page. --Haham hanuka 15:39, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the section was completely 'froked' long ago. ;-) DJ Clayworth 21:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that's defroked.--Shtove 22:27, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering how editors to the Adolf Hitler article love to link every word, I'm surprised defroked hasn't been wiki-linked yet. Drogo Underburrow 22:31, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Defroked ? Sorry I don't understand. It sounds like a "faux-ami" to me. Ericd 23:16, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Adolf Hitler's religious beliefs]] 

message: What will it take for Str1977 to stop his abominable practice of moving other editor's text around on the page? Do you see what he has done this time? We now have duplicate text, and other errors on this page. Put it back the way it was, if you can even figure it out now, Str1977. And don't do that again. Drogo Underburrow
I see you removed the duplicate material, but didn't correct other errors you created. I suppose we'll just leave them. Now don't do that again, and stop vandalizing the page by removing a section header. That header was created to start a new thread, other editors responded to that thread. Then hours later, STR1977 deletes the header. For one thing, this changes the meaning of what I wrote, as it puts my original comment in a section I did not write it for. Drogo Underburrow 00:12, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You removed the header from an entire section that was there for hours before you arrived on the scene, I created the section, and then others replied, now you deleted it. This is vandalism simply because you don't like the header. Too bad, you don't get to erase something that was there for awhile and others replied for hours with no problem., now you are putting all their replies in a new section. Drogo Underburrow 00:19, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The post was there before you created a new section. Think before posting next time. Now, stop wasting my time. Str1977 (smile back) 00:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The text before that header was on the subject of NPOV. I then created a new section, to deal with the statement that "Hitler was a Catholic". The new section was started by my opening statement, to which other editors replied. This is an entirely new thread, and I do not appreciate your coming along after the fact, and deleting the section, thus moving the entire thread back into the section on NPOV. This also changes the impact of my opening statement, which stated the new section, and makes it into a reply to the thread you merged it in. You say don't tell other editors what to do. Well, if you keep your hands off of other people's edits, then they won't tell you what to do. Drogo Underburrow 00:40, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

text: I'm not "playing the enforcer", I asking you to keep your hands off of MY edits. Drogo Underburrow 00:49, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

text: This isn't your talk page. Don't treat it like it is by editing section headers that other people make. Don't move other editor's comments around. Don't insert your comments out of chronological order disrupting the previous conversation, and changing the meaning of what other people said by making your comments before theirs. Drogo Underburrow 01:07, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Str1977's moving text around on the page

message: --Haham hanuka 07:28, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: "This page is protected from editing until disputes have been resolved". From  --Lord Deskana Dark Lord of the Sith 07:57, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: dispute has been resolved, just remove the "Hitler's religious beliefs" section (which became an article: Adolf Hitler's religious beliefs) from here. --Haham hanuka 15:55, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

text: If anyone can point me to the resolution, please do so cause I'd like to know. Str1977 (smile back) 15:56, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this article still fully protected? 

message: I see this user retired from WP at 3.04 am today. Cerebral cortex blown? Hitler talk can harm your health.--Shtove 10:43, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually it was just a wiki-break. I liked the sound of being retired, which I hope to do soon (in real life), so I can devote my full time to wikipedia. Right now I only am able to devote a small amount of my free time. Just think how good this place would be with having me editing here 4 times as much? hehehGiovanni33 12:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yikes!--Shtove 16:23, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gio33