lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Joseph Mobutu

message: It seems to me that this fellow was much more widely known as Mobutu Sese Seko at the time of his death. Perhaps we should move this there? - Montréalais 04:30, 11 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: His name was never "Joseph Mobutu." The article should use either his correct original name {Joseph-Desire) or his later African name. Adam 11:07, 29 Jan 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Rye (city), New York

message: Where's Rambot's article? -- AdamRaizen 08:26, 2003 Aug 11 (UTC)
:best to note it on the bot's talk page (I just did so). Census data is odd, and the data areas don't always correspond to towns, and in this case, there's two places, a city and a town, named Rye. -- Someone else 08:35, 11 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Interstate 80

message: Should there be a section on this article that lists the auxiliary routes of I-80? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 17:03, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently this is handled via thisinfobox at the bottom of the page.  IMHO that is sufficient. However, I don't have any strong feelings either way if this would be better handled by the current infobox or a list.Dave (talk) 17:23, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, well the infobox is not available on the mobile version of Wikipedia. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 22:09, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a valid argument to say that infobox isn't mobile viewer friendly and so either needs to be re-written or replaced with something else. That infobox has been around a while, it was probably designed before mobile web viewing became normal. Being as how you are the one that noticed the problem, I'd advise to create some mockups of some redesigns/replacements in your userspace and invite some people to test which is the most readable for both computer and mobile viewing. Dave (talk) 18:36, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I will see if I can get around to doing that. NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 08:00, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auxiliary routes
Talk:Aleph number

message: Need to define what the plus sign that looks like an exponent is in aleph sub alpha on the right of the equals sign  in the section on aleph dash alpha for general alpha.
100.15.138.239 (talk) 23:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: It is defined in the previous paragraph. --Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 23:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  incomplete 

message: If you didn't already know, how would you understand \aleph_\omega = \sup\{\aleph_n | n\in \{ 0, 1, 2, ... \}\}? or \aleph_\lambda = \bigcup_{\beta < \lambda} \aleph_\beta? What is a supremum or union of cardinal numbers? 
Yes, maybe you happen to know that we often identify a cardinal with its initial ordinal, and that we often identify an ordinal with the set of all smaller ordinals. But maybe it would be better to explain without this convention. And anyway, I don't see this convention explained at all in the article at the moment. 
Yes, there is a link to least upper bound, but maybe it would be better to have at least a short explanation in place. And anyway, I don't see anything in the other article about cardinal suprema at all!
For that matter, what is \aleph_n for finite n? Yes, \aleph_1 was explained as the cardinality of the set of all countable ordinals, so maybe a reader would guess what \aleph_2 means. But still, I think it wouldn't hurt to be clearer. --2607:FEA8:86DC:B0C0:B9B4:5D25:5007:EEE7 (talk) 23:31, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, for \aleph_2, I missed that there is also a link to successor cardinal. But again, maybe it would be better to have at least a short explanation in-place. And also, the link occurs in a later section of the article than the reference to \aleph_2. --2607:FEA8:86DC:B0C0:B9B4:5D25:5007:EEE7 (talk) 23:49, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You may take this "The α-th infinite initial ordinal is written \omega_\alpha.  Its cardinality is written \,\aleph_\alpha~." as the definition, if that helps. JRSpriggs (talk) 20:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It wouldn't hurt to articulate \aleph_2 as much as possible. This would give the reader a stronger sense of grounding. The current sequence of "0,1, trivial successor function that is obvious to all, omega" is not very intellectually satisfying. It feels like a cop-out or hand-wavey or I've-been-gypped-give-me-my-money-back feel to it. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 03:31, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  definitions don't make sense without more context 

message: In Futurama s.2 ep.12 “Raging Bender” at 01:30 a movie theater is named Loew’s ℵ0-plex — a pun on Multiplex (movie theater). Tuvalkin (talk) 08:13, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  In popular culture
Talk:Grandfather clause

message: If no one opposes, I will trim the current Examples section down to a handful of properly-cited entries covering the different topics now present. Editors seem to have turned it into an exhaustive list, rather than merely examples, and many of the entries are not sourced. The article is worse for it, because most are highly specific examples (e.g., regarding particular sports leagues) of trivial explanatory value. Knight of Truth (talk)
:Please do. Any entry without a source calling it an example of a grandfather clause should be removed. Only a few good examples are needed. Rezin (talk) 22:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Trimming of "Examples"

message: I'm not sure the best way to correct this (I may try to later if someone else doesn't beat me to it) but Truman did in fact attempt re-election in 1952; however due to a poor showing in the Democratic primaries, he chose to drop out of the race early in the primary elections.  It is true he never attempted to run for president in any election after 1952 though. 2601:1:C100:2C90:59A8:48CB:D6BC:A8A4 (talk) 02:03, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect about Truman

message: The section explains three times the same concept (namely restriction of voting rights). It should be trimmed down and sources unified. 2001:620:618:5C0:2:80B3:0:5E (talk) 07:33, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate text in Origin section
Talk:Salou, Spain

message: Was this written by somebody employed by Salou's tourist board? Reads like it. "The Salou Product"? Yeuch!! Don't people live here? What about that? History? Demographics? The fact that the i love ryan shecklar and elvis presey! I want to bang them!!!    of Cambrils is infinitely more plesant, and that Salou is a high-rise dustbin of pallid British holidaymakers, cheap and nasty fast food dives, overloud nighclubs and grisly hotels? GRAHAMUK 11:45, 11 Aug 2003 (UTC)
Talk:Purchasing power parity

message: *I've just done a major rewrite.rajkumar  The new version clarifies what the PPP method is, what it's used for and why, and what issues it has.  I also removed all references to a PPP "theory."  PPP is a method, not a theory.  I know of no theory saying that "in equilibrium, the exchange rate that will prevail between two countries will be that which equalizes the prices of traded goods in each country."   The whole point of using PPP is that using real exchange rates, goods won't cost the same amount in different countries. Isomorphic 01:46, 10 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: "Major rewrite"

message: While I realize that this may be overly technical for most of the audience, one of the critical factors in understanding differences, especially for china, is the currency peg placed between the chinese and american currencies.
If the currencies were allowed to float (if free markets were allowed to correct imbalances), the chinese currency would be stronger.  By extention, the real GDP of China would be considerably higher then the $1290.
This reality not only helps explain the benefit of PPP in inefficient currency markets, but also would be important to help assuage confusions like the above post.
:No, a GDP does not stick to your currency, as life has shown. Chinese currency hike will not increase GDP in US dollars. That did not happen in Switzerland, that did not happen in Japan, that did not happen in Zambia, that did not happen in Somalia. Why should it happen in China? --18:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Currency Pegs 

message: concept 36.252.193.184 (talk) 19:53, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @ 2403:6200:8840:823:7963:915F:C7CC:B71B (talk) 18:50, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GDP 

message: I wamt to check 2405:204:3128:6034:E18F:9401:6DAE:ECE9 (talk) 10:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ppp 

message: The first paragraph under the heading === Exchange rate prediction[edit] === seems self-contradictory. SamIAmNot (talk) 13:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exchange rate prediction 

message: What goods and in what proportion does the IMF use to calculate price levels, and where do they publish these prices? --95.24.60.6 (talk) 18:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMF 

message: Are average prices in a country usually counted or lowest ones (or highest?)?. Because, like, India is a country with huge population, with different regions. Are average prices for India taken, or the cheapest region or what? --95.24.65.62 (talk) 16:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Average? 

message: What's ICP? 
I see it used in this article and elsewhere, but I don't know what it means. Thanks, DavidMCEddy (talk) 12:47, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I found it: International Comparison Program. I then found it spelled out in this article and added "(ICP)" immediately after, so others who don't know can more easily find it. I also added it to the "ICP" disambiguation page. DavidMCEddy (talk) 20:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  What's ICP?
Talk:Hasbro

message: Hi
I would like to make a edit because I found this link saying that hasbro has reported a lost, and it wasn’t because of the Coronavirus (I wasn’t doing anything wrong).
Link:https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/05/06/1-factor-took-hasbro-to-loss-hint-not-coronavirus.aspx.2600:1004:B01E:280B:9948:A0D9:F8DF:A54B (talk) 20:37, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: . It's not clear what changes you want to make. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 21:12, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I want to do it on the history 2008-percent section, I want to add stuff.2600:1004:B01E:280B:9948:A0D9:F8DF:A54B (talk) 21:16, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2020 

message: I want to add this piece of information just recently released about hasbro reporting a loss from buying Entertainment One. Link:https://www.fool.com/investing/2020/05/06/1-factor-took-hasbro-to-loss-hint-not-coronavirus.aspx.2600:1004:B01E:280B:9948:A0D9:F8DF:A54B (talk) 21:20, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: . It's still not clear what changes you want to make.  Edit requests must be precise, as in the exact text you want to add or change, and where.  –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 22:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 May 2020 (2nd attempt) 

message: This page needs admin attention  from this vandal that seems to wish to get into a edit war with other users, because they disagree with something being added ot the article. To my knowledge Wikipedia was about a consensus, not one user rules the entire site, and several users are trying to include news, while one user says they re not allowed to and constantly deleted their edits through reversion. Recent events are not able to updated instantly, and other editors must give people time to find proper and relevant sources, and should not be allowed to start an edit war over them, so why is this user constantly doing this for the past week on this article? shadzar-talk 03:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, if you would like to report me for vandalism, please do so at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. However, I would advise that you read what constitutes vandalism before you do. In any case, I found a source that meets WP:RS and edited the text in a way that should meet the reliable sourcing policy. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 04:06, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism by [[User:Aoi]] 

message: If there are better refs to be found, we should probably mention something about this. As it was , it appears to be simply soapboxing for business-humanrights.org, which I can find no RSN discussions on, and appears to be something to be treated as a primary source with no weight of it's own. I don't see it mentioned in either of the independent sources, so there's nothing to give it any weight.
Since years have passed since the reports were released, we need better refs to demonstrate encyclopedic value. --Hipal (talk) 18:18, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Sweatshop labor
Talk:Pointing device

message: Someone who knows what that is needs to add a caption. Otherwise I'll just put one in that says "What." --212.2.171.132 00:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second picture 

message: In my opinion, touchpad should be categorized in "Based on motion of an object". Because it is more like a mouse than a touchscreen. They are both based on motion of an object. The only difference is one is mouse, the other is finger. Actually you can't operate a touchpad just by touching without moving.  --  Benwu232 (talk) 03:33, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  classification of touchpad 

message: See here, PC Magazine from April 26 2012.--Blaua (talk) 13:51, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: '''BarMouse''' is missing

message: The outline was changed in favor of a better overview. This design was arbitrary and there are other reasonable alternatives. If someone has other suggestions or ideas, feel free to change the outline again.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielSc (talk • contribs) 11:45, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outline 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Left button and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 5#Left button until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Steel1943 (talk) 06:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Left button" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Sony

message: The headquarters location and image listed for Sony Group Corporation on the Sony Wikipedia page is wrong. The correct headquarters location is 
"Headquarters（Sony City）
1-7-1 Konan
Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0075 Japan" (source: https://www.sony.com/en/SonyInfo/CorporateInfo/Data/Map/ ). 
The Sony City Minato Mirai location that is currently listed is not Sony Group's headquarters location. Refer to the above link to see that it is not listed as the headquarters location. 240B:11:3B40:1500:6109:CC9F:F508:BAA9 (talk) 06:42, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: Don't see the error here. The street address given by Sony in that link still says Minato, Tokyo, which is what our infobox also says. Not sure what you are referring to when you say "The Sony City Minato Mirai location that is currently listed" as there currently does not appear to be any instances of the word "Mirai" in this article.  Cannolis (talk) 04:54, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headquarters location for Sony Group Corporation is wrong 

message: Change “Net income” to “¥943.622 billion”. 
The net income is incorrectly stated as “¥943,622 trillion” for FY2022 when it was actually “¥943.622 **billion**”. Source: https://www.sony.com/en/SonyInfo/IR/library/presen/er/pdf/22q4_sony.pdf
Else Sony’s net income is somehow an order of magnitude higher than its revenue and around the GDP of all of Japan; the former being extremely unlikely and the latter I believe being logically impossible given Sony is based in Japan. 157.131.168.236 (talk) 04:35, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Correction to my last paragraph (request for edit itself is unchanged): ¥943,622 trillion can be interpreted as ¥943.622 quadrillion given the rest of the page uses “.” convention to indicate fractional values. That then is of course an absurdly unlikely value. I say this all not to be pedantic or to harp on what I believe is a small typo, but to hopefully just add more support as to why I believe this is technically incorrect. 157.131.168.236 (talk) 04:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

text: Thank you for making a change; however, the value is still incorrect. The decimal is correct now, but it should be “billion” not “trillion”. 157.131.168.236 (talk) 01:32, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: . SkyWarrior 03:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 12 July 2023 

message: Please could somebody add :Category:Companies in the Nikkei 225 ? 78.148.152.27 (talk) 22:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be easy enough  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.16.44.93 (talk) 21:19, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  New cat
Talk:The 3DO Company

message: Okay, I know 3DO is in the process of going under, but I think using their logo is a copyvio.  I won't revert the article yet (to the version before the addition of the image), but I really think this is a copyvio.  Please let me know if I'm wrong, or else I'll remove the image in the next few days. —Frecklefoot 15:28, 11 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Employees were laid off, and the company's game brands and other intellectual properties were sold to rivals like Microsoft, Namco, Crave, and Ubisoft, and also to founder Trip Hawkins, who paid US$405,000 for rights to some older brands and the company's "Internet patent portfolio".
Was Trip the founder?  I was under the impression he took over the company in the 90s and kept it floating with money out of his already rich pocket, but I have no sources right now saying either way.  Anyone confirm/deny? - Bdice 21:44, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)

text: Yes, he was most certainly the founder, I have 1993 articles and reference works confirming that.
TerokNor 22:24, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: 3do

message: The cost of the games could reach to the price of $250
What 3DO games cost $250? I confess I actually owned one of these things and I never saw a game retail for more than $60.
yeah right
Some games cost 100$ (SF2)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.21.82.37 (talk) 17:43, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  $250 games? 

message: We should have a list of all games 3DO made not just mention a couple I checked this article because I wanted to check a game. Jamhaw 21:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: List

message: 3do means Three Dimensional Operable in case someone would like to add it. M8gen 10:37, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NAME DEFINED

message: These guys were big enough to get a full article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.209.228.89 (talk) 22:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand? 

message: When the first fully functional chipset was delivered by the foundry 3DO used for its custom graphic ASIC, the software developers testing the shockingly disappointing 3D capabilities of the sytem deemed it "2.5DO". When the Playstation came on the scene with its breakthrough 3D graphics capabilities, this prophetic moniker was born out and then some. Travismillman (talk) 22:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  2.5DO 

message: I thought 3DO was a pun on 'audio, video', as if 'three-deo' followed suit. Can someone post a citation for this first theory? VanillaSeagull (talk) 01:39, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  3 Dimensional Operating System? 

message: If 3DO really was "Dissloved into GoAnimate 3D Softwares" then please provide a source.  And for Indrian, the only reason I warned you as well is that it was a bit harsh to jump straight in whith the assumption that the edits were vandalism - AGF and all that.  Chaheel Riens (talk) 09:24, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit warring
Talk:Edi Rama

message: I think that the different and reliable sources cited speak for themselves as regards the relevance and media attention reserved to the facts described by the president and to the words he used (the word "controversy" recurs several times). I'm a Neapolitan-Italian-Albanian and I'm always "in line with the law". 87.11.88.149 (talk) 14:04, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ""Vaccines smuggling" with Italy" paragraph in Controversies, removed by an Edi Rama fan that uses international Wikipedias for political propaganda purposes
Talk:Romantic fiction

message: I was under the impression that (at the bottom end of the market, at least) there were rather specific publishers' guidelines, similar to those in the porno novel industry; this event must occur by that page, etc. Does anyone have any cites, or can they show this to be untrue? -- Karada 17:03, 11 Aug 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: I used to have a copy of the Mills & Boon guidelines, but I don't remember it being that specific.  US and UK publishers are probably different, in any case. Deb 17:14, 11 Aug 2003 (UTC)

message: OK, I've been looking all over Wikipedia for someplace where "romance poetry" in the modern sense is discussed, and have not found even the tiniest bit of information on it anywhere. Love poem redirects to poetry even though love poetry is mentioned nowhere on the page (except for one external link), Romantic poetry deals solely with the Romanticism sense of the term rather than the romantic love sense, and Romance novel only addresses the narrowest sense of the word: heterosexual, novel-length, happy-ending typical stories. I finally found a link to Romantic fiction in Talk:Romance novel, where Katherine Shaw said: "For other fiction that has romantic content - but that does not fit the strict criteria of current Romances, there's the Romantic fiction article." So I came here thinking I'd finally found the page so very well-hidden on Wikipedia that would have the information we so need to link to from St. Valentine's Day and Romantic love and Romantic poetry and Heart (symbol) and many other pages, but no - nothing but an empty disambiguation page! So. Where can we put information on stuff like Roses Are Red? -Silence 08:13, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: What about the love poems?
Talk:Flap

message: I can't find any references to the use of the word "flap" to refer to a mass ufo sighting, other than in the "controversial" sense. Not sure if it is appropriate usage. Mapetite526 20:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[List of major UFO sightings]]

message: lady flaps? 87.102.34.99 (talk) 21:09, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  what about
Talk:Light-emitting diode

message: LEDs commonly have a reverse voltage limit in the 5V range. Enough to allow easy multiplexing. For AC operation, you usually need a series silicon diode. A typical data sheet is here. Gah4 (talk) 08:40, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  PIV 

message: I've read the 1961 Allen & Cherry paper cited in this article. The sentence claiming that this paper reports on light emission isn't correct - that paper mostly discusses photoconductivity. I'll delete the sentence in a day or so. It is possible that Allen & Cherry did observed light emission around then, but that important claim is not backed up by the reference. Easchiff (talk) 03:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This paragraph of the article has been revised to expand on the GaAsP devices that were the first visible light LEDs to be commercialized. The full history of visible light LEDs is complex, and there is further discussion later in the article. Easchiff (talk) 15:43, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Allen-Cherry 1961 paper - does not report on light emission
Talk:List of percussionists

message: I'm inclined to question whether, for example, Neil Peart and Buddy Rich really belong on the list of percussionists rather than just on the list of drummers where they both rightly appear as well. There is definitely a difference, and people can be one or the other or both. Evelyn Glennie is a percussionist. Gene Krupa and Keith Moon were drummers, as I'd think was Buddy Rich. I'm less sure about Peart. Vic Firth is both. And it's always a bit subjective, as is the question of who belongs on either list. Hmmmm. I'm reluctant to take anyone off, but I urge thought in adding people. Andrewa 20:36, 11 Aug 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled