lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Wilhelm Weitling

message: Cant make the pxl tool work! Fix the picture if you could help me out here.
Axezz 20:14, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi 2600:100F:B016:39AC:50D9:B783:E6AF:B7A0 (talk) 06:24, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  S
Talk:Alice Walker

message: — Assignment last updated by Raanyasiddiqui (talk) 03:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: WGS-200 Introduction to Women's, Gender, and Sexuality Studies

message: To be included in an Infobox, both parties should have publicly stated to be in a relationship. And how does Wikipedia define "partner" anyway? A one-nighter? A one-weeker? A one-monther? This is ridiculous, and belied by the actual article. Tallard (talk) 18:41, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Info Box should not list Tracy Chapman as "partner"
Talk:Hardworking families

message: This page was recently nominated for deletion, and the consensus decision was to keep it. The deletion debate is archived here. ugen64 20:21, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion

message: This was dominating the Glittering generality page and is worth an article in its own right. So I moved it back here Lumos3 10:35, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reinstated as a page

message: Either that or hard-working, but the UK Tory party need to do a spelling test! 51kwad (talk) 13:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hard working, surely?
Talk:Civil Air Patrol

message: I propose merging National Blue Beret (which is marked with "") into Civil Air Patrol. I think the content in "National Blue Beret" can easily be explained in the context of "Civil Air Patrol", and a merger would not cause any article-size or weighting problems in "Civil Air Patrol".MarcRic::Ruby (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry for the (very) late response, but I would suggest that if it were merged anywhere the target should be National Cadet Special Activities rather than the main CAP article. It doesn't really have a place here. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: These are not standard in America. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:04, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does a topic about an American institution use dmy dates?
Talk:Gruoch

message: It was proposed to move the article to Gruoch of Scotland as per Wiki naming conventions for former royal spouses Mowens35 20:31, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: This article should go to Gruoch. It is not ambiguous, and doesn't need to be dabbed with "of Scotland". Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 09:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Maybe this is a stupid question, but how is the name Gruoch pronounced? -- MidnightSoldier (talk) 02:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation?
Talk:Microsoft Pascal

message: This page was recently nominated for deletion, and the consensus decision was to keep it, merge it with another article, and/or redirect it to another article. The deletion debate is archived here. ugen64 20:37, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion

message: I was told that MS pascal 4 allowed to create much larger programs than TP at the time (before TP got protected mode in TP7), due to the available memorymodel comparable to "huge" (variable datasegment per module for global vars) in C land, while TP only supported "large" (one datasegment for global vars overall)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.159.64.210 (talk) 11:26, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft Pascal attraction 

message: The paragraph that claims that Borland Pascal v.4 and Microsoft QuickPascal shared the quirk to "[...] occasionally ignore one or more lines of source code when said code was compiled" struck me. Not only am I unaware of this quirk (I have worked extensively with Borland Pascal v.4), I feel that the claim that QuickPascal has the same quirk should be substantiated (e.g. with a reference).
Thiadmer Riemersma  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.211.83.48 (talk) 20:16, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea who added it, but I can confirm that it is true.  Both compilers will ignore the same lines of code, though there does not appear to be any predictability that I can see.  However, on one point you are quite correct: a reference that supports the statement would be nice. DieSwartzPunkt (talk) 16:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  substantiate claim of common quirks
Talk:Curandero

message: Might it be better to move this to Curandero, the more general term for traditional mexican healers, since it includes both men and women? --Spangineer ∞ 20:47, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
*By all means, use your best judgement.  And, as you seem to have some knowledge about the topic, feel free to expand the article; as it stands, it is now pretty general and a bit vague.--Pharos 21:34, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No mention of the band by the same name; could we get a "see also"? amazon ref 74.128.253.162 20:24, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  (The band) 

message: To give a source for the bit about Catholic elements you could add this link, although it is in Spanish. Someone who knows how to cite and link the citation can do this. Link: http://www.es.catholic.net/sacerdotes/222/605/articulo.php?id=7712
http://www.wellness.com/reference/therapies/curanderismo/practice-theory-and-evidence
added another link.
NegiSpringfieldof4ch (talk) 20:35, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: A possible source link
Talk:Political efficacy

message: This page was recently nominated for deletion, and the consensus decision was to keep it, merge it with another article, and/or redirect it to another article. The deletion debate is archived here. ugen64 20:53, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion

message: I'm not sure this page makes the difference clear.  KevinPuj 03:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internal vs. external
Talk:Sachiel

message: This page was recently nominated for deletion, and the consensus decision was to keep it, merge it with another article, and/or redirect it to another article. The deletion debate is archived here. ugen64 21:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There is enough information to warrant a separate article. Alexander 007 22:49, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion

message: Should this article and Sahaquiel be merged? 64.180.15.26 (talk) 14:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sachiel = Sahaquiel? 
Talk:Director of Public Prosecutions

message: I propose splitting this into different articles for the differing jurisdictions, leaving a disambig here. Does anyone object? -- John Fader (talk | contribs) 21:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Split
Talk:Chongqing Yucai Middle School

message: This page was recently nominated for deletion, and the consensus decision was to keep it, merge it with another article, and/or redirect it to another article. The deletion debate is archived here. ugen64 21:03, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Votes for deletion

message: This appears to be a potentially very important school. Please tell us more. Dahliarose 12:52, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Pigment

message: I am failing and delisting the article for the following reasons:
*Physical basis section is entirely unsourced.
*New sources for historic pigments entirely unsourced.
*Manufacturing and industrial standards entirely unsourced.
*Scientific and technical issues entirely unsourced.
There's enough unsourced content that I have to delist it. Wizardman 15:30, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA reassessment 

message: Is this worth uploading? Should this article have a section about it? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:21, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pigment-producing bacteria 

message: If anyone is interested in expanding the history section, this seems to be a nice summary:
:
–jacobolus (t) 06:14, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  history source 

message: Almost nothing about printer inks on here. Also, the article says that you can't put pigments in water. Then how does one explain water-based pigment inks, such as "iX"? 79.106.203.88 (talk) 17:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Printing
Talk:Stronghold (structure)

message: Either this should become a disambiguation page, or else it should be devoted to the military sense (the sense from which the others are derived), with cross-references to the articles about the other senses. Michael Hardy 21:29, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: indeed, i would go for disambiguation page, ill add it to my todo list now. Boneyard 10:11, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree, this should become a disambiguation page. Coll7 16:58, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Literary journalism

message: I'm not sure that Literary Journalism and Creative Nonfiction are the same genre. The former has more to do with journalism, which might be shorter articles, or magainze pieces, where as Creative nonfiction tends to be more book length works. There are some other distinctions between the two, I think. Comments on this would be appreciated, thanks.  Yours, Calicocat 21:34, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Edwin Hatch

message: *I removed the last sentence from the last paragraph: 
"He presented his famous paper Influence of Greek Ideas and Usages Upon the Christian Church during the Hibbert Lectures of 1888."
since this is already stated at the top. Altered the text in the top and blended the two sentences.
Quibus 21:43, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Nucleophilic addition

message: orginal definition;
Nucleophilic addition involves the addition of a nucleophile to a chemical compound. Think of this as a negatively charged atom "desiring" a positive charge, and therefore, creating a bond to it. (A golden rule of chemistry: nature hates charges! Eliminating charges and creating a non-charged compound is often the driving force behind reactions...!)
To this definition it can be argued that 
- nucleophilic addition is not possible with just any compound
- reactant and products neutral yet charged particles generated.— Preceding unsigned comment added by V8rik (talk • contribs) 22:06, 26 April 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Original definition

message: how is nucleophilic reaction on alkene possible when it itself is nucleophile— Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.180.107.82 (talk) 08:32, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nucleophilic reaction

message: The diagram denotes a hemiketal, and the caption text agrees.  But the text in the diagram says hemiacetal; I am going to take the diagram down until it is corrected.Maneesh (talk) 15:00, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram error 

message: I highly recommend editors to consider consulting the two books produced by Francis A. Carey and Richard J. Sundberg about Advanced Organic Chemsitry. The two books are split into two parts "Part A: Structure and Mechanisms" and "Part B: Reactions and Synthesis".
Zyvov 02:08, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carey and Sundberg
Talk:Cardiovascular disease

message: Sentence contains a series of three or more phrases. Inserting comma to separate the elements.
Change "x": High blood pressure is estimated to account for approximately 13% of CVD deaths, while tobacco accounts for 9%, diabetes 6%, lack of exercise 6% and obesity 5%.
to "Y": High blood pressure is estimated to account for approximately 13% of CVD deaths, while tobacco accounts for 9%, diabetes 6%, lack of exercise 6%, and obesity 5%. Nickroehm (talk) 22:43, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Cannolis (talk) 23:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 17 February 2022
Talk:Remand (court procedure)

message: Why was "may not have to work or attend (prison) education"  removed from the list of benefits of a remand prisoner? Whilst I understand this may not be true worldwide, its certainly true in some prisons in Australia. -- Longhair | Talk 22:11, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm adding this back in. The ip that removed it has 2 edits and hasn't replied here after some time. -- Longhair | Talk 07:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any reason why a principal, perhaps primary, definition of remand ("To send back. The sending by the appellate court of the cause [sic] back to the same court out of which it came, for purpose of having some further action taken on it there." Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edition, ©1979) doesn't appear in this article? Unless there is objection or some other issue of which I'm unaware, I'll edit the article to include it in a day or two. Duckecho 05:15, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Replied on your talk page. -- Longhair | Talk 02:47, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half an article? 

message: I wikified what words were available. I put the court-to-court definition first because it's shorter. I put two sources, one for etymology and one for legal usage. Feel free to massage as necessary. Duckecho 04:57, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  First look at second meaning 

message: I have sub-divided the former page 'remand' to:
*Remand (court case)
*Remand (imprisonment)
Andy Mabbett | Talk to Andy Mabbett 22:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sub divided 

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot (talk) 05:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-12-10 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: I don't know anything about the law, but reading this article and the one for the German link, I get the impression that these are really two different things and that the wik linking of the two is incorrect. For example, it seems the Remand is only a sort of correction or possib le correction, whereas it seems U-haft is holding during initial  investigation.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.126.109.131 (talk) 00:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  German link 

message: Just weighing in on the box that appears on this article. It appears that the page has been updated so that it specifically refers to the U.S. court procedure, so I'm curious as to why it still needs to reflect a worldwide view. As such, an we remove the box? Fred.Pendleton (talk) 23:23, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worldwide View
Talk:Mount Aso

message: “... Recession rates of two waterfalls, Ayugaeri Falls and Sugaru Falls, which are associated with the gorge formation of in the Tateno Canyon in the western part of the Aso caldera, are examined on the basis of the empirical equation after Hayakawa and Matsukura (2003). The waterfalls are postulated to have originated at a location out of the caldera as a waterfall which was formed around the front of the Akase lava erupted from the inside of the caldera. The initial waterfall receded about 2.8 km upstream forming the gorges to the present site of the confluence of the Shirakawa River and the Kurokawa River in the caldera. At the confluence, the waterfall bifurcated into two waterfalls which continued recession along the Shirakawa River and the Kurokawa River to the present locations of the Ayugaeri and Sugaru falls. The estimated recession rates from the equation are 0.086 m/y for Ayugaeri Falls and 0.14 m/y for Sugaru Falls. The calculated time taken for the recession of both waterfalls from the confluence to the present sites of the individual waterfalls is nearly equal: ca. 13,000 y, indicating that the bifurcation of the waterfall occurred about 13,000 years ago. Rough estimation suggests that the time for the initial waterfall to recede the distance of 2.8 km is 14,000-28,000 y. The total time of the waterfall recession from the start to the present location is thus 27,000-41,000 y, which is consistent with the age of the Akase lava flow (ca. 30,000 y).
Key words: waterfall, erosion rate, bedrock erosion, rock control, Aso volcano ... ” - Sparky 07:56, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [http://home.csis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~hayakawa/lib/05_hayakawa+_SugaruAyugaeri_abst.html Tateno Divide]

message: replace  with 
As you can see the resolution and the clarity is much better. Igor Berger (talk) 22:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd agree with this, seems to be a vastly better image. (Note that I am currently Igor's mentor). With a bit of work in fact, it might qualify as a Featured Picture on Commons. Very good work IMO. Franamax (talk) 23:23, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to replace Mount Aso Naka dake picture 

message: I think if we make the Aso Caldera article the main one for geology and volcanic history as Aso Volcano and leave this one mainly relating to an important and populated geographical area given its weaknesses this  would be consistent with what happens when caldera have lakes in them. ChaseKiwi (talk) 21:10, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: A bit confusing

message: That seems strange. This isn't rocket science. Given the technology we've had for already many decades, why is it so hard to get a definitive measurement? Toddcs (talk) 12:17, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "although sources vary on the exact distance"
Talk:Blackheath, West Midlands

message: I'm not very happy with these edits: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Disuss. Cutler 10:21, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blacheath Expanding, and future plans 

message: Modern day Rowley Regis is seen as one of the six towns that make up Sandwell MBC - the others being Oldbury, Smethwick, Tipton, Wednesbury and West Bromwich.
Politically speaking the Wards which make up RR are:
Blackheath, Cradley Heath and Old Hill, Rowley and Tividale.
So these days Blackheath is seen in Rowley Regis.
Yes Blackheath is a town, so is Cradley Heath, Old Hill etc. These all make up one "Super Town" - Rowley Regis - which doesn't really have a centre like the other Sandwell towns - ie. you can easily refer to Oldbury town centre, West Brom town centre etc so it does seem a bit disjointed. To me the town centre of Rowley Regis would be Blackheath.
To me the boundary of Rowley and Blackheath is the Sir Ropert Peel public house - the pub and up the hill = Rowley, below the pub = Blackheath.
:No disagreement with any of that. It was the word suburb that I objected to. Please sign posts with four tildes "~~~~" Wikipedia will then insert your name and date details like this: Cutler 11:42, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blackheath in Rowley (Regis)??
Talk:Lessons (Buffy the Vampire Slayer)

message: Please help complete the Angel/Buffy episode articles. See what needs to be done on this sub-page of WikiProject Buffy:
Wikipedia:WikiProject Buffy/Episodes
Also please help update any major changes made to episode articles on that page so that progress can be mapped.
________________________________________________________
Che Nuevara, the Democratic Revolutionary 22:29, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is probably something that may never be resolved: The First did push Spike's hair around; but wasn't this at the point where Spike was hallucinating madly anyway? Just thought it was interesting. Oh wells. Not the end of the world (okay, technically it -was-). Lots42 (talk) 09:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Goofs 

message: I think it would work out better to compress the Expanded overview just a -tad- more and have one singular plot summary section. Lots42 (talk) 14:55, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The whole thing could do with a trimming, or possible merge to a list of episodes. I've trimmed in line with other TV episodes as best I could. WikiuserNI (talk) 16:43, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggestion
Talk:Star Trek: Insurrection

message: Anthony Zerbe's head explodes in the film, just like it did in Licence to Kill.  Wonder if the screenwriter knew that in advance.  Poor guy... Kochamanita (talk) 02:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: More Trivia

message: ?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.166.168.71 (talk) 23:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another deleted seen 

message: see Chagos_Archipelago#Politics and Depopulation of Diego Garcia Turidoth (talk) 22:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inspired by history? 

message: Redlinks in the main article page, possible articles to create, just noting them here as an assist:
#Santa Barbara Studios
#Dean Jones (designer)
Cheers, — Cirt (talk) 13:36, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlinks, possible articles to create 

message: Can one of you trekkies explain how the Enterprise can return to the Ba'Ku after it has ejected its warp core? I assume you need one of those for warp speed? This has bothered me for years.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.162.4.7 (talk) 01:07, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warp Core Paradox 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :ST9. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 7#ST9 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ST9" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Madster

message: I've removed most of the content of this article, reducing it to a one-paragraph stub. The article made a lot of unsourced assertions about living people, and read like a screed from an angry ex-employee. There should be valid sources for a lot of the material, especially the lawsuits, but until they're included, the content can't stay. | Mr. Darcy talk 00:27, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrite needed

message: User:Evandhoffman, who is a former employee of this company, just restored the objectionable material with the edit summary, "Reverted to previous version, not sure why the actual content was removed." Oddly enough, the reason why it was removed was sitting right here on the talk page. The tone is completely inappropriate and the article contains multiple unsourced assertions about living people. It's not that hard, folks. | Mr. Darcy talk 22:30, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted again
Talk:Kripke–Platek set theory with urelements

message: In what way does it differ from just ZF without the axiom of infinity ?
--195.93.102.71 22:41, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Can somebody who's an expert in this topic write about how KPU differs from other axiomatizations? Statements like "KPU is considered freer than ZF" or "KPU is favoured by constructivists" or "XXXX famous result cannot be proved with KPU, but YYYYY famous result can."
Crasshopper (talk) 07:15, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Compare & Contrast
Talk:Anime music video

message: 12-19-02---- Music And Anime Mix In Costa Rica
From Jay:
According to Irene Jimenez, producer of the Tv Show MXI, the classic Anime Music Video, Engel/Evangelion created by Erick Cadwell has become one of the most popular music videos in the tv show.They broadcast this amv since July and from that time they get phone calls every day asking for it.
This AMV combines the music of the hit song ENGEL of the german band Ramstein with videos of the Evangelion TV series.
MXI is on air from Monday to Friday at 5:00 p.m on channel 15, the universitary channel. Its the most known show of the channel and its really popular among the young people of the country. 
http://www.animenewsservice.com/archives/dec29.htm --Gwern  (contribs) 21:41, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Example of popular AMV (in Costa Rica)
Talk:John Aston Sr.

message: I really dislike the Sr./Jr. suffix used to disambiguate this player from his son – we just don't use that convention in the UK. -- Arwel 23:02, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: That's rubbish. Of course we do. How else would we distinguish between a man and his son of the same name? – PeeJay 22:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled