lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Flying Buffalo

message: Rick Loomis didn't leave the Army 'til 1970.  The company started not during that year but in 1972.  I hereby amend. Tribune 20:27, 15 July 2005 (UTC)

message: What's wrong with sources from the company's own web site?  That's a primary source!  I agree that if we had some independent source, that would be better, but their's nothing wrong with citing the actual stated history of the company being profiled, so in any case please leave the links there.  -- Kaszeta 13:23, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Verification? 

message: (see page 2) - quite interesting and perhaps useful to extent the article. -- mkrohn 23:36, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The History of Play-by-Mail and Flying Buffalo 

message: http://www.flyingbuffalo.com/awards.htm Web Warlock (talk) 11:16, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Awards 

message: I changed the naming convention in the lede from "Flying Buffalo Incorporated" to "Flying Buffalo Inc." since their website uses the latter and it does not appear that they are incorporated. It seems like Rick Loomis just took on the "Inc." as part of the company name. 
I could be wrong, and if so, feel free to revert and point it out. Airborne84 (talk) 00:26, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inc. versus Incorporated 

message: Should the separate company link be referenced in the article instead of just Rick Loomis PBM Games?
http://rickloomispbm.com/ Jokem (talk) 18:19, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , external links shouldn't normally go inline in the text, but I think it would be OK to add it as a reference in the External links section at the end. Airborne84 (talk) 01:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: , thanks. I moved the URL from the lead to External links since the lead doesn't require citations. Material there should simply reflect cited info in the main body and the Rick Loomis PBM info is noted (and cited) in the main body. I expanded the URL into a full citation using a template for consistency. Thanks for your interest. Airborne84 (talk) 21:56, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Airborne - I don't understand what you did.  When I click the link, it goes to a Rolling for Initiative link, which is the second entry in the external links.  Both links go to the same place.  Jokem (talk) 02:15, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: My mistake. It's good now. Airborne84 (talk) 04:17, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Separate Company
Talk:Serie C

message: I would assume C1 and C2 are broken up into C1/A, C1/B etc by way of location. If this is so, and if it is, how it is done are worthy of note here.--LukeSurl 20:31, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2005

message: How many of these 90 clubs fall into each of the above 3 categories? Chicheley 03:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Professional, semi-professional, amateur

message: I'm going to rework the article fully. Serie C hasn't been just one league for a very long time, there have been two leagues at different footballing levels since 1978. I'm giving C2 and C1 each their own article, this will make them easier to handle and this article can be more a history of the league. - Daddy Kindsoul 05:46, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rework

message: Serie C → Lega Pro — Serie C has been renamed to Lega Pro. See Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Football/Italy_task_force#Lega_Pro and lega-calcio-serie-c.it — CapPixel (talk) 16:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: The section had without a source for a long time, instead of a fans-craft that the wiki editors counting the number of participating season themselves, would someone kindly provide an external reliable source? Especially some club are illegitimate phoenix club like Cosenza Calcio 1914 v. Cosenza Calcio, A.S. Siracusa, v. U.S. Siracusa v. Siracusa Calcio. Matthew hk (talk) 15:47, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clubs section
Talk:Emotional intelligence tests

message: I see that this article contains none of the standard statistical  information on psychometric tests, such as internal or test-retest consistency.  
Under the circumstances I think it should not be included in Wikipedia.
217.33.166.212 12:27, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest deleting those links because they are trash.  Look for scholarly papers on EQ instead.
----------------
would be happily completed with :
emotional quotient (psychology): quotient between the "emotional age" and the chronological age that meaures emotional intelligence (how well a person understands emotions); the most famous test used to determine the EQ is the MSCEIT (Meyer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test); see emotional intelligence.
from : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EQ
----------------
It seems to me this article should be merged with Emotional intelligence. Kslays 17:08, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Classical fencing

message: This article is nearly devoid of any citations or references (at least within the article).  The whole article needs citations added.  I'm adding an "Unreferenced" tag until some more are added.  I'll try and find some today, if I can, but for the amount of citations needed any help would be appreciated.  Saberswordsmen1 (talk) 11:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Unreferenced

message: I added some material today to fix some grammar and clarify (I added some run-ons, I think, but will get to them later) plus explanatory material on ROW which otherwise was unclear, and added balance to the critiques section. Also corrected the 'changed the rules' comment on sport fencing ROW; the original text was wrong 
Cfencer 20:43, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: ROW and balance in critiques section

message: Since my training included much informal bouting or competition to develop a sentiment de fer, I have added some text explaining that there is a spectrum of training styles within the classical fencing world.
--Maestromatt 19:42, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pedagogy

message: The definition of "classical fencing" used here is clearly that of http://classicalfencing.com/
I fail to find the term so used or defined anywhere else. There is a 2003 book by the author of the website, but it seems to stop there. This appears to fall under , one A. A. Crown attempting to coin a term. --dab (𒁳) 17:35, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: whose term? references?

message: hi guys! I am looking for schools who teach the classical fencing, schools who have never started to train sport fencing. Do you know some?--85.3.78.27 (talk) 20:08, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The problem is that your implied dichotomy (i.e. a "classical fencing" school vs. a "sport fencing" school) is a false one. For example, Masaniello Parise's 1884 fencing treatise describes "real" fencing (i.e. a system to use with sharps), but it was the same system used for fencing as a sport. This co-existence of swordsmanship as an art for defense and as a sport is pretty constant. Rapier masters talk about about it in the 1600s, the Bolognese masters give explicit instructions about it in the 1500s, and Fiore alludes to it in the 1400s.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marozzo (talk • contribs) 13:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Schools who still exist until now
Talk:MUSIC-N

message: I think it would make sense to merge the content of Music4 on this page.Bikepunk2 (talk) 16:23, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that Music4 should be merged to here (and corrected to MUSIC IV as is used in sources.) --mikeu talk 20:52, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from [[Music4]] 

message: As stated in the first paragraph... Why not? I´m guessing it´s because the Csirac didn´t have a DAC, just a "debugging speaker"... the IBM 704 manual doesn´t mention any DAC either, nor debugging speaker, so how did MUSIC I make sounds? 
first post on wikipedia... will thank help if I made any mistakes  Histriocito (talk) 01:34, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mean that the reference from the University of Melbourne (http://www.csse.unimelb.edu.au/dept/about/csirac/music/ ) is pure fantasy ?
I guess they somehow adapted an external DAC on the CSIRAC. Bikepunk2 (talk) 17:10, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

text: I don't know about CSIRAC but at Bell Labs Mathews describes a process where an IBM 704 or 7090 writes a "sequence of numbers recorded on the [digital magnetic] tape" which is then placed in a standalone DAC. The DAC converts the tape to a "sequence of pulses proportional to the numbers from the digital tape." This is then run through a low pass filter to produce a "smooth time function" output to a speaker. It is clear that the DAC was not a peripheral attached to the IBM at this date. He also says that it takes 4 to 10 seconds of computer time to generate each second of music.  --mikeu talk 14:13, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  CSIRAC didn´t make digital music 

message: I've tried to clean this up a bit and at least add one reliable source for the early versions. There's a complete family tree of N at Music N. (Though annoyingly they use lower case for "MUSIC N" despite the fact that early computers were only capable of uppercase letters.) --mikeu talk 07:30, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Clarification: the all caps for MUSIC above refers to the Bell Labs versions. The manual for MUSIC 360 mentions "MUSIC 4B" instead of MUSIC IV. --mikeu talk 07:44, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup 
Talk:Tawny Kitaen

message: This article has useful information, but there are major problems:
1) Many controversial statements are not backed by citations.
2) Existing references are very weak. An article naming her once, that does not back up what is said here is irrelevant.
3) Large number of links to Tawny Kitaen suggest parts of this article were written by people with conflict of interest, which is contrary to Wiki policy.
4) Parts of the article reads more like a tabloid feature, than an encyclopedia.
It's tone is too casual
:I doubt anyone associated with Kitaen had any hand in this article. Not sure what you mean by "large number of links to" What? The references? The movies/TV she's done? You need to be more clear about your issues. As for her legal issues they are well documented, sourced, referenced and cited in legit media, I see articles from the AP, and the NY Times just for 2, those pass the test. Also please sign your comments, it's does 2 helpful things, lets others know who you are, and it timestamps your comments so I know if I'm in a 10 year old discussion or not. Status4 (talk) 15:19, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs rewriting in encyclopedia style

message: I can find reference to Raquel Welch being named Fairest of the Fair for Miss San Diego County, but nothing of the runner up contestant. Is there a citation for this? Dohhh22 (talk) 16:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal Life

message: There's a photo at :fy:Ofbyld:Tawny_Kitaen.jpg - would that be suitable for using here?  GoingBatty (talk) 02:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That specific photo which is on a wiki page in another language, is not freely licensed, and the uploader's rational for using it even though it isn't, really isn't kosher. However there must be a usable photo of her out there that will meet the wikipedia photo requirements, I didn't find anything already on Wikimedia Commons. Status4 (talk) 15:08, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: She was married to David Coverdale in 1989, not 1898. She didn’t even exist then. 2601:3C0:4302:2CB0:4446:E7D1:471:5679 (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: JasonH1978 has fixed that . Thanks all. -- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 15:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 May 2021 

message: Please add this obituary from the Hollywood Reporter. It seems more official than the one from
”Metal Sludge”...
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/tawny-kitaen-bachelor-party-star-music-video-vixen-dies-59-1234950193/
78.77.198.253 (talk) 16:24, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. We don't just add a reference because it exists. If you suggest some content based on this reference, please follow the instructions and do so in the clear manner suggested. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs)  23:25, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 May 2021 (2)
Talk:Tabloid television

message: This article is highly POV and full of tendentious and unsourced statements. I've removed some egregious examples. SeamusSweeney (talk) 12:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Low quality article

message: I happened across this article and believe that the topic is very important, given today's state of local television news. However, the article is not comprehensive enough and hence I would suggest the following to further improve this article:
*A basic history of tabloid television
*More information about its format
*Relationship to a station's need for ratings. 
Also, I suspect that this phenomenon is not restricted to the U.S. Information concerning tabloid television in other countries should also be included. Pentawing 19:05, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Improvements needed

message: So the rest of the UK doesn't have any tabloid television? Lucky us.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.32.51 (talk) 19:32, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  England 

message: I don't think shows like Entertainment Tonight and post-Bill O'Reilly Inside Edition count less as tabloid TV and more of news magazine material (noted film critic and classy guy Leonard Maltin did appeared on the former during his lifetime). Espngeek (talk) 00:44, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What isn't tabloid television
Talk:Eddie Clarke (musician)

message: Was Eddie really born in the same town as Lemmy? Please verify fact. - Roda, 22:17, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: nope, totally my mistake, think it was Twickenham as fasteddie.com says that was his hometown, taken it out for now. Alf 21:40, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarke's birthplace

message: The guitarist project box contains a field for an audio sample of a signature solo sample or guitar style from the guitarist. I can think of a couple of nominees but someone else's thoughts on which audio sample would be a "best fit" may likely be different than mine so it's open for any nomination. 156.34.142.110 13:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox audio sample

message: I have first hand knowledge of this location in London at the time mentioned and I think this is incorrect - it's is being confused with the location Motorhead first practiced, Sound Management. As far as I'm aware, there was no rehearsal studio on the corner of Kings Road, Chelsea around 1975/1976 called "Snobs Rehearsal Studio". There was "Sound Management" which used a basement accessible from Kings Road near the corner (and leased from the Furniture Cave), and just around the corner in Lot's Road was "Manos", which used an upper floor leased from the Furniture Cave and where Donovan, Suzie Quatro and other RAK acts practiced.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indieshack (talk • contribs) 16:15, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Snobs rehearsal studio? 

message: The article text mentions: "Clarke was working on re-fitting a houseboat, when he met drummer Phil Taylor,[3] who had recently joined Motörhead and introduced Clarke to Lemmy.".
In Lemmy Kilmister's authorized biography, White LIne Fever, Lemmy,  White Line Fever(2002). Simon & Schuster. . he states that although both Eddie Clarke and Phil Taylor were working on a boat project, that was just a coincidence. It was actually the receptionist Gertie at the rehearsal studio that Motorhead was then using who introduced Lemmy Kilmister to Clarke, since she was dating Clarke at the time.
Indieshack (talk) 06:36, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, feel free to change the article accordingly, @IndieShack. Lemmy's own published recollection of how they met is likely to be a more reliable source for how they met than The Guardian obituary currently cited. JezGrove (talk) 19:30, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I just looked back, and it was me who added the current reference to the story of how they met -  I was just adding a newly published source to a claim that didn't already have one. Your source is better, so feel free to reword the article and to replace the citation I used in good faith back then with your own reference to Lemmy's biography. JezGrove (talk) 19:49, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: OK thanks, will do - please review my changes. Indieshack (talk) 17:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Eddie's introduction to Lemmy
Talk:Bob Dylan's Greatest Hits

message: https://www.discogs.com/Bob-Dylan-Greatest-Hits/release/440937
Are the 1966 release versions from the UK in Discogs in error? Did they really come out on or after 27 March 1967? 
https://img.discogs.com/qfHCXyMbzDzVbKlJhtnl9Wr7hUc=/fit-in/480x640/filters:strip_icc():format(jpeg):mode_rgb():quality(90)/discogs-images/R-5276192-1389372859-8725.jpeg.jpg
A copyright date is not a release date, is that the source of 1966? 
Or is it the people who attest to seeing it for sale in 1966? 
https://www.facebook.com/searchingforagem/posts/638484292866219?match=YnJpYW4gZ3Jpc3QsZ3Jpc3QsYnJpYW4%3D
"I recall first seeing & hearing it in the company of a bunch of friends between December 27 & 31, 1966. Furthermore, it entered the UK album charts in early January 1967, indicating a very late 1966 issue for the UK. I distinctly remember expressing my personal delight that the album included 'One Of Us Must Know' and my disappointment that 'Positively 4th Street' was absent. We encountered import copies of the USA version in Spring 1967 & were surprised that it featured fewer tracks, one of which was 'Positively 4th Street'!"  —  Brian Grist‎ 
EDLIS Café  11:34, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  1966 release in the UK?
Talk:Antiquities of the Jews

message: It is lamentable that the first point about the Antiquity of the Jews that comes to mind to the contributor of this article – and indeed the only point, considering that the remainder of the article imparts no greater insights than a copy of some of the modern chapter headings – is the so-called Testimonium Flavianum. It is not merely a matter of NPOV. It is also that we have here literature and history of a people and an author from among their own that precedes Christianity; and any Christian contributor owes them and the work's author the respect to consider the work in the first instance from this perspective. Unless someone wants to claim that Josephus wrote 20 volumes in order to bury therein a remark about Jesus of Nazareth (and perhaps in a way that leaves subsequent Christian scribes sufficient scope to adapt it to reflect more closely their own beliefs).
Portress 21:24, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Talk is cheap. Pitch in, please! You're an editor, too! :) --NightMonkey 01:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Can we translate this into something understandable:
:(cf. AJAXX.267, the overlap mentioned therein occurred from 1.9.93 to 14.3.94).
I don't know what AJAXX means, maybe it means whale doodoo for all i know, and if the oddly formatted numbers are meant to be dates, then they should use standard non-ambiguous date formatting. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.20.190.160 (talk) 03:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AJAXX ? 

message: Stated in the section titled Manuscripts is, "The extant copies of this work, which all derive from Christian sources (even the recently recovered Arabic version), contain two disputed passages about Jesus." Following that one of the disputed passages is described but not the other.  Dr.khatmando (talk) 03:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Manuscripts section: additional clarification ? 

message: Perseus at Tufts has all the volumes of Antiquities programmed in with both Greek and Whiston's 1895 English translation. So if you are frustrated that the Loeb volumes after 14 are not yet in the public domain, you can read a non-Loeb digitized version at Perseus.
100.15.127.199 (talk) 19:18, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  for the full work
Talk:Cut Chemist

message: Here's the link to the video referenced in the article for "What's The Altitude": . Hopefully that will be sufficient evidence to remove the "citation needed" tag.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.78.212.159 (talk) 00:42, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What's The Altitude YouTube video

message: Cut Chemist's "Litmus Test" is an edit/remake of an earlier mixtape he did called "Rare Equations" which had a short (non-bootleg) stint on CD a few years ago. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.87.214.159 (talk • contribs).
--Actually, I don't believe that is correct. I have both albums. "Rare Equations" is a double album that is rather obscure but nevertheless available. There IS a single-disc, 30-minute album called "Cut In Class" which IS an edit/remake of "Rare Equations". I purchased "Cut in Class" at a Cut Chemist show in January 2005 and I've never seen it anywhere else (or even mentioned anywhere else) otherwise-- it seems to be self-produced, and so where Rare Equations is rather obscure, "Cut in Class" is REALLY obscure.  I will go look at the info (e.g. catalog number) and add it to this entry.   "Litmus Test" was, as far as I know, meant to be a preview for his first major label album that would be out in "a few months"; the album actually ended up being released as "The Audience's Listening" after a time period that had stretched to two years. Migp 21:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rare Equations

message: Cut Chemist did not produce all of the Jurassic 5 EP. DJ Nu-Mark produced some of the tracks. Can someone please change that? Infamous30 10:58, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Production Credits on J5 EP:
Talk:Particle detector

message: There are two reasons why adding the extra link to ATLAS might seem a bit vain: I work on the experiment, and I wrote a lot of the article.  However, as was requested in December 2004, I have been building up the ATLAS article in more detail than most detectors, precisely because it can serve as a useful illustration of how they work.  Thus linking to it seems appropriate to me; but if you dissagree, feel free to discuss.  -- SCZenz 21:28, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text:  there is BaBar too at SLAC, and it's still running Tatonzolo 19:48, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

message: I'm an engineer but not a particle physicist. I see pictures like this one and have a few questions:
* What's the size scale? From cloud chamber, I'm guessing it's on a human scale of inches to feet, which is a bit of a surprising coincidence given how many orders of magnitude there are between our size scale and that of the particles.
* How can we detect the path of particles since detecting a particle once involves exchanging photons (or other particles) between the particle and the detector (right?)
Thanks. —Ben FrantzDale (talk) 02:58, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size, mechanism?
Talk:Self Portrait (Bob Dylan album)

message: Self Portrait rose as high as #4 on the Billboard 200 in 1970, on July 25 and again on August 1 before falling. Citations: http://www.billboard.com/charts/billboard-200/1970-07-25 http://www.billboard.com/charts/billboard-200/1970-08-01
Wigwam went as high as #41 on the Billboard Hot 100 in 1970, on 15 August and 22 August. Citations: http://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100/1970-08-15 http://www.billboard.com/charts/hot-100/1970-08-22
Cheers, - Jake  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.46.194.79 (talk) 14:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billboard Listing Errors and Citations
Talk:Steve Lovelady

message: This biography was written by Bonnie Britt and posted on the letters column at Romenesko.  Except for the Clint Eastwood addition, it's entirely factually correct.
I removed the comment that the Philadelphia Inquirer is "(affectionately known as the Inky)". RJFJR (talk) 18:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled