Talk:Temporary International Presence in Hebron

message: It seems that some do not wish to see the word 'occupied' used in any discussion of the West Bank. The original article referred to the 'occupied territories'; this was removed and replaced with West Bank. I put in the term 'occupied West Bank'; this has been twice removed, with an accusation of it being POV. I don't know if any one disputes that  the territory in question was occupied by Israel in 1967, against the wishes of its population. Other than in fiction, it is occupied now, and the term 'occupied' is neutral in this context, either as in the original 'occupied territories', or as my later compromise. Not to include it is POV. And the fact of the occupation is very relevant to the subject of this article. Imc 13:03, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: occupied

message: What are the so-called anarchists of Hebron who attempt to keep the Arab presence present in the Jewish section of the city called? You know, the ones who live side by side with the Arabs? What's their relationship with TIPH? --Yodamace1 20:12, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question from the ignorant

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Temporary International Presence in Hebron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100506020050/http://www.tiph.org/en/About_TIPH/ to http://www.tiph.org/en/About_TIPH/
*Added archive https://archive.is/20131219133553/http://www.tiph.org/en/About_TIPH/TIPH_background/ to http://www.tiph.org/en/About_TIPH/TIPH_background/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100918035517/http://www.tiph.org/en/About_TIPH/Mandate_and_Agreements/Agreement_on_TIPH/ to http://www.tiph.org/en/About_TIPH/Mandate_and_Agreements/Agreement_on_TIPH/
*Added  tag to http://www.tiph.org/PressRelease/PressRelease.asp?id=77&br=&ver=
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:47, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: this source (as most others covering this) states that Netanyahu said that "We will not allow the continuation of an international force that acts against us" - and the goes on to state the assault on a ten year old boy and the tire slashing incident as examples of acts by TIPH against Israelis.Icewhiz (talk) 19:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, his statement was "We will not allow the continuation of an international force that acts against us". And yes, it came after that incident. It also, according to this source, came after it was reported they had issued a report documenting human rights violations by Israel. Hell the original reporting called it: Some of the people Haaretz spoke to for this article voiced concern that the publication of the report’s findings may result in Israel refusing to renew TIPH’s mandate to operate in the city, which comes up for renewal every six months. And the TOI source has several quotes about the expulsion, among them:"cooperated with extremist organizations and promoted delegitimization of Israel.""which has been active against the state for many years, will no longer be part of the landscape in the region."Nothing in the source supports that it happened as a result, only that it happened some 7 months after. nableezy - 02:42, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Haaretz draws a connecting line as well, but how about AP/TOI -   - as direct as can be. Icewhiz (talk) 17:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  The odd thing about all this is why Icewhiz would like to portray Israel making a very major decision for very petty reasons. The fact that it is absurd on its face doesn't seem to count. Zerotalk 01:54, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  A sixty-something strong unarmed observer is from from major - regardless, we follow sources (in this case AP/TOI) - which clearly show Israel was concerned about the attacks on Israelis for some odd reason. Icewhiz (talk) 04:21, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  No, the reason was pressure from the settlers and their supporters, who include Bibi's cronies, precipitated by the leaking of TIPH's report that charged Israel with multiple violations of international law. Everyone knows that. Slashed tires?  Pull the other one. Zerotalk 09:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Termination reason