lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ace of Cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: there was a rock band in the sixties called the ace of cups, they should have their own page  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.13.102.215 (talk) 08:34, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  disambiguation 

message: Many of the suit articles seem to be thin on information and I think Smiloid raises a key point above so I am suggesting merging this article with Suit of cups
Tetron76 (talk) 16:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to Suit of Cups
Talk:Eight of Cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I have deleted these parts of the article.  For further explanation, please see Talk:Eight of Coins.  Craw-daddy 14:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Game Usage and card game stub

message: I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the cups suit would be better placed in Suit of cups pageTetron76 (talk) 17:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to
Talk:Shortridge High School

message: This article has a LOT of potential, but there are some problems.
*If the athletic information is a direct copy-and-paste from the ISHAA web site, that is a copyright violation. However, the information can be reformatted to avoid this without major problems.
*Needs Wikilinks throughout.
*The third sources in the reference list concerns me. Is this an interview with someone or what? A book? A paper? A published article? If it is a personal interview that the author has conducted with someone, or is the personal recollections of the author himself/herself, that would constitute original research, which is not allowed. More independent sources would come in handy, too, and footnote the sources to link with the appropriate sections of the article.
Let me know if I can help. Realkyhick 02:10, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Five of Cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the cups suit would be better placed in Suit of cups pageTetron76 (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to
Talk:Bantoid languages

message: I know 100% sure that Lingala, one of the main native languages of Congo (Kinshasa),  does have "Bantoid" as parent branch somewhere in the hierarchy. Hence, the Congo should be shown as well. Where's the Congo on that map? Well, if you pursue the southeastern end of Cameroon (formed like the corner of a bed sheet) in the direction the "tip" points to, you will first get to Rep. Congo (Brazzaville), then to Dem.Rep. Congo (Kinshasa). -andy 77.191.32.17 (talk) 07:31, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  The map doesn't cover everything it ought to cover
Talk:Four of Cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the cups suit would be better placed in Suit of cups pageTetron76 (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to
Talk:William Henry Harvey

message: Harvey collected the type specimen for Verticordia harveyi, described and named by Bentham. This may be a notable inclusion for the article. cygnis insignis 19:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  named 

message: His obituary in Proceedings of the Royal Society vol XVI pp xxii use February 5, 1814-May 15, 1866 for his birth-death date - phe 18:37, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth-Death date 

message: "Mrs. Ovens, Mr. W. Backhouse, James Dr. P. Neill and others"
Something missing above, before or after "James". JMK (talk) 09:47, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Names
Talk:Southern Bantoid languages

message: In May 2020, an IP user made several edits to this and related articles, changing "Bantoid" to "Bantuid", and sometimes changing them back (as well as some other edits to do with Sandawe). They left no edit summary and gave no sources. They left "Bantuid" in two places in this article, and I have just changed them back. --ColinFine (talk) 12:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bantuid? 
Talk:King of Cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While Tarot cards were originally designed for Tarot card games, their use in divination is well over two centuries old and is also part of their heritage. The article's current emphasis on the occult results from divination being the most common use for Tarot cards in the English-speaking world. The "occult" tag is therefore appropriate. However, more could be done for these articles to acknowledge their invention in Italy for gaming. Collisteru (talk) 05:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the cups suit would be better placed in Suit of cups pageTetron76 (talk) 17:12, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to

message: This article totally missed the King of Cups is representative of the Fisher King, from Percival.  139.138.69.196 (talk) 01:55, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Source? Collisteru (talk) 05:26, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fisher King
Talk:William James Beal

message: The next bottle was supposed to be dug up in 2020. I can not find any updates on this. Has it been forgotten?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MizardX (talk • contribs) 11:47, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update? 

message: I don't understand 's "recentism" revert to my edit. It's not like an experiment that iterates once every 20 years has a lot of developing information. The April, 2021 iteration happened; that fact renders the text of the section out of date. What's the problem? —Isaac Rabinovitch (talk) 15:57, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Recentism" revert. Comment
Talk:Knight of Cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the cups suit would be better placed in Suit of cups pageTetron76 (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to

message: Also when you recieve this card, you may recieve a message(invitation) mostly from white person. 
I pulled this card (from daily Astrology answers.com) and met a white guy talk to me in the store. But the message , conversation etc ... always comes from whites, and it is always not bad news from the knight of cups. 41.114.68.74 (talk) 05:31, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also ...
Talk:Sanfilippo syndrome

message: It is cheese 69.124.84.155 (talk) 16:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheese
Talk:Nine of Cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the cups suit would be better placed in Suit of cups pageTetron76 (talk) 17:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to
Talk:Page of Cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the cups suit would be better placed in Suit of cups pageTetron76 (talk) 17:08, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to
Talk:Seven of Cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Tarot did indeed originate as a playing-card game, but the number of tarot packs produced for game play is dwarfed by the enormous number and variety of packs created for occult use or fortunetelling. Regardless of how one feels about this state of affairs, it is as a divinatory oracle that the tarot pack is best known today. 74.83.14.59 (talk) 07:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the cups suit would be better placed in Suit of cups pageTetron76 (talk) 17:05, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to

message: This page concerns itself solely with the imagery created by artist Pamela Colman Smith to represent her vision of the card. This 1909 deck, while certainly the best known and most influential of modern tarots, is a stark departure from the traditional format of the suit cards from their origins in Renaissance Italy forward, where the suits simply showed a certain number of their particular denominator arranged in a geometric pattern, much in the manner of contemporary playing cards. Likewise, the interpretation is that given by Smith's patron, A.E. Waite, rather than the more astrologically based occult interpretation of the card (Venus in the Third Decan of Scorpio). To fix this page, however, would necessitate fixing all – a daunting task! 74.83.14.59 (talk) 07:32, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Art & Interpretation
Talk:Six of Cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: The "Divination Usage" section is a copyright violation of the website .  While I have reverted once to remove this, User:Fairebianca apparently feels it's ok to keep this copyrighted material here.  Craw-daddy 06:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation

message: I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the cups suit would be better placed in Suit of cups pageTetron76 (talk) 17:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to
Talk:Ten of Cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the cups suit would be better placed in Suit of cups pageTetron76 (talk) 17:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to
Talk:List of Secretary-General of the United Nations memoirs

message: The image above is missing essential source information.  It will be deleted on 2007-03-20.    — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 02:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Image:Boutros Boutros-Ghali.jpg]] 

message: I removed all the photos from the list of Secretaries General. The reason for this is that we don't have free images for all of them and non-free images are subject to greater restrictions such that they are used in a few locations as possible. Yes, some of the images were free, but to have some people with an image and some not just doesn't make much sense. howcheng  {chat} 18:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos
Talk:How Can We Be Lovers

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lightoil (talk) 03:29, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: How Can We Be Lovers? →  – The liner notes of Soul Provider and the official single releases (see here) do not format the interrogative title with a question mark. The version without the question mark appears to be the most widely used version, so the page should be moved to reflect this. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 21:06, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 December 2023
Talk:Royal cypher

message: How on earth does this not "represent a worldwide view on the subject"? Just tag it Royal_Cypher_(UK) if you want to so picky about it....
:I agree, who is going to deny that this is the royal cipher, much less have a controversial opinion on it?  I'll remove that worldview box now . . . Ace Frahm 23:50, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have re-tagged this article for globalization. As demonstrated by the relevant Commons category, royal cyphers are or were widely-used in non-Commonwealth monarchies such as Austria-Hungary, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Egypt, the Kingdom and Empire of France, the German Empire and its constituent and predecessor states, Greece, Hawaii, Italy, Luxembourg, Monaco, Montenegro, Norway, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands, and Yugoslavia. Despite this, non-Commonwealth countries get all of one line in this article. How do you think it doesn't represent a worldwide view of the subject? It's quite obvious to me. 75.154.112.63 (talk) 16:32, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Globalize 

message: I don't understand the  tag that's just been added to this article. What exactly is missing from the lead? --Ħ MIESIANIACAL 20:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too short 

message: Is it possible for noble to have cypher or is cypher only allowed for royals ?
Siyac  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Siyac (talk • contribs) 17:08, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's just a monogram with (usually) a crown. —Tamfang (talk) 21:13, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Royal" cypher 

message: One of the images in the gallery section is :File:The Royal Cypher of King Carol II of Romania on the porch roof of the Royal Palace of Bucharest.jpg;
this is fine as an illustration of that part of the palace, but the king's cipher is painted black and is on a deeply shadowed background, so it can hardly
be seen.  I suggest that a different illustration would better serve in this article.  Or if there isn't one available, crop this one to just the
relevant part and make it brighter or something. --142.112.220.184 (talk) 04:26, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The cypher can be seen clearly when zoomed, but another photo might be better. Perhaps of those athttps://www.google.co.il/search?newwindow=1&q=royal+cypher+of+King+%22Carol+II%22+of+Romania&tbm=isch&source=univ&fir=O9H89PQCB1Y1cM%252CMbsUECWlJGAlbM%252C_%253BUP6M6l5cVdTWnM%252Cw_srO2yLm-seoM%252C_%253BlAC4H-2jYjaiiM%252CapOMb1PTPhaKOM%252C_%253BqMSWFRWMx3ntJM%252CuXpSsAe8y9QmoM%252C_%253BS1R2cO2-WmeL_M%252C3EwNhJbpGZZftM%252C_%253BKUHFKknBCz2vlM%252Cq9SVSy-dod6x3M%252C_%253BQiDU3-8DjvT2CM%252C-6uQGCF2ZIMvRM%252C_%253BnXdVmTjYWmerUM%252CRNtpBFontvXADM%252C_%253BfrgH3J38MenUcM%252CiOFPfW3E4E1LFM%252C_%253Bj9GDwrOhSrf0BM%252ClwYxLF1k984NgM%252C_&usg=AI4_-kTbnxFcqLys8P7I4fHIZA_KpJeUig&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi6rvmtoIP_AhXvT6QEHR0ICPkQ7Al6BAgREBM&biw=1229&bih=577&dpr=1.56 can be used. Mcljlm (talk) 06:24, 20 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dark illustration
Talk:Maasai language

message: In the article I read: "Adjectives in Maa serve only to describe the noun, and change tenses depending on the noun that they are describing." I have never heard about adjectives changing tense according to the noun the describe. Could it be meant that they change gender according to the noun's gender?Redav (talk) 22:35, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do adjectives change tense according to the noun they describe, or rather gender? 

message: Is there any kind of official orthography for Maasai? Does it indicate tone and +/-ATR? I’ve only found one source suggesting an orthography but it was behind a pretty steep paywall, and I don’t know if it’s widely accepted. שונרא (talk) 12:40, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orthography
Talk:Three of Cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: There are many articles on individual cards that would be better placed in other articles
and I suggest that this content be merged with the Suit of cups article
Tetron76 (talk) 16:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to
Talk:Two of Cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: Many of the suit articles seem to be thin on information and I am suggesting merging this article with Suit of cupsTetron76 (talk) 16:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to Suit of Cups
Category talk:Suit of cups

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Nothing's Gonna Stop Us Now

message: So I have the original vinyl of this album.  There is NO mention of Pete Sears.  Also, in the Got a Revolution book there is no mention of him playing on this song. JoeD80 (talk) 17:58, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pete Sears 
Talk:Eight of Wands

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I've deleted these parts in this article.  For further explanation, please see Talk:Eight of Coins.  Craw-daddy 14:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Game Usage and card game stub tag

message: A large part of this article appears to be copied from http://www.learntarot.com. 
I'm not sure of current procedure, but I will remove the section if it is not rewritten unless someone better versed than I am can show me an alternative.  Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  03:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  COPY AND PASTE 

message: I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the wands suit would be better placed in Suit of wands with this page changed to a redirectTetron76 (talk) 12:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to
Talk:Five of Wands

message: Parsa and myself have been have been placing the NPOV tags on the cards. See the talk page at Talk:The World (Tarot card) Since tarot cards were not designed for the occult, the placement of "occult" stub tags does constitute POV and ignores tarot's gaming heritage. These individual card pages offer nothing more than occult speculations and perhaps should be deletedSmiloid 00:54, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: A large part of this article appears to be copied from http://www.learntarot.com. 
I'm not sure of current procedure, but I will remove the section if it is not rewritten unless someone better versed than I am can show me an alternative.  Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim  03:52, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  copy and paste 

message: I am suggesting that the information on the individual card pages for the wands suit would be better placed in Suit of wands with this page changed to a redirectTetron76 (talk) 12:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge to