lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Château de Roquetaillade

message: The reason that I am adding this to the discussion page, rather than the Roquetaillade page itself, is because I don't have time to (figure out how to) make it look perfect at the moment. I will try to add more (and better) pictures in the future when I have time to figure out how to mess with this. Mcdanimr 18:18, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture of the Roquetaillade
Talk:Château de Clagny

message: This article uses footnotes for parenthetical comments rather than citations.  There are no citations and the references listed do not relate to the article.
The article needs a deliberated edit and rewrite -- particularly with regard to missing information about the structure's design and history.
--E. Lighthart (talk) 16:55, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article improvement 

message: This article is in need of editing to include period -- i.e. 17th century -- sources as well as recent scholarly research on the subject of the château de Clagny, which have been largely published in French.  The on-line catalog of the Bibliothèque Nationale de France is a good starting point, as would be a number of the on-line catalogs of American and European universities.
EFLighthart (talk) 15:38, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing needed: Sources and citations 
Talk:Sunny Day Service

message: See the translation page at Wikipedia:Translation/Sunny_Day_Service - Zepheus <ゼィフィアス> 00:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Château de Castelnau-Bretenoux

message: Does anyone here know if this chateau is in anyway linked to Noël Édouard, vicomte de Curières de Castelnau (see article)? I just wondered as he is a "comte de castelnau" but the article on the chateau only mentions barons of castelnau. If the chateau was indeed the comtes residence I think it should probably be mentioned in the corresponding article. Also it is of personal importance as I am a distant relation the comte. Thanks --Camaeron 17:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:United States Aviator Badge

message: Need to incorporate history of the badge going back to the 1913 version.  See Obsolete badges of the United States military and :File:USA_-_Aviator_Wings_-_1913.png. — MrDolomite • Talk 05:35, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: 1913 version

message: @McChizzle: with regarding to your comments in the edit summary here, did you mean the vectorization from PNG to SVG is inaccurate, or the PNG image was inaccurate to begin with? And in either case, how might we make the SVG more accurate? 痛 (talk) 02:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Note the star and wreath and how it is placed on top of the shield. The SVG depicts the wrong means by which that command device is incorporated onto that rating badge.--McChizzle (talk) 22:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:   English is not my primary language, so let me make sure I understand you. Are you suggesting that the star and the wreath are connected to the shield in the wrong way? I am looking at this image here. It appears that I can just enlarge the "star + wreath" combination, such that the combination is (1) touching the wings and (2) placed behind the shield. --痛 (talk) 21:07, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes --McChizzle (talk) 01:10, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I have updated the SVG graphics accordingly. 痛 (talk) 22:18, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "SVG is not an accurate depiction of what that badge looked like"
Talk:Cathar castles

message: Weirwolfwikipedia added to the article the following paragraph:
:Several castles were, however, occupied by Cathar believers or by noblemen sympathetic to the Cathars. Such castles were attacked and destroyed by Simon de Montfort's "Albigensian Crusade", a dramatic example being the castle of Penne (Tarn) whose jagged ruins overlook the river Aveyron.
I have removed it, not because it is not important, but because it is confusing. The so-called "Cathar Castles", which this article concerns, have no historical connection with the Cathars at all; indeed they postdate them by many years. "Cathar Castles" is a modern tourism marketing term. The cathars did have fortified camps (castra) and de Montfort did destroy some (but not all) of these; this is mentioned in the individual entries where they exist. It might be an idea to list Penne under Other "Cathar castles" and, this being a castle that does not seem to have a Wiki article, write it up. Emeraude 12:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Paragraph removed
Talk:Basic Training Honor Graduate Ribbon

message: Do the Marines have no equivalent? Andrewa (talk) 00:25, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Short answer, no. --McChizzle (talk) 00:39, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you! If we could source that I think it would be of interest to many outside of the USA, and should be included explicitly in the article. Andrewa (talk) 15:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marines?
Talk:Presidency of Thomas Jefferson

message: I'm sorry but why have there been 30 plus edits to this page since the start of this year?  Has scholarship on his Presidency changed so much in that time that this entire article required an almost complete rewrite (compare March to current revision)?  Especially when not a single book used as a source is newer than 2005?  Like do you realize how much scholarly and historical knowledge changes in 10 years?  The fact that books from the 1980's and decades ago are able to be used as sources and those sources carry more weight than links do is frankly confusing.  Do we consider the Encyclopedia Britannica from 1985 as a good source of information?  I'm sorry but unless you are making a claim about what specific books says using a book to prop up an old idea at best and at worst a lie or extreme bias because people just see (Pruit pp.7) when they hover over the inline notation should be scandalous on this site.  
----JaqenHghar80 10/23/2017 09:08PM CST  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.20.194.86 (talk) 02:09, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your opinion. I'll let the other editors know that a random person on the internet thinks that the article shouldn't be edited anymore. Orser67 (talk) 03:11, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why Have There Been 30+ Edits To This Page In The Past Year Alone?
Talk:Château de Bruniquel

message: There is a mistake in this English translation. The Chateau Jeune is NOT the yellow castle (jaune) but the YOUNG castle.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.38.193.26 (talk) 19:32, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're absolutely right and I have slapped my wrist for writing it in the first place!!! Whatever was I thinking? Emeraude 15:40, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:ABC Signature

message: They've made bad shows, and some good shows. But now, word has reached my ears that they are thinking about making a Sitcom version of the Geico Cavemen. The show will bomb, they, once again will hang their heads in shame. --Yancyfry (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 20:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are they thinking? 

message: I don't think Bob Iger is the president of this studio. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.233.214.171 (talk) 01:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ABC Studios president - http://www.disneyabctv.com/bios/bio_pedowitz.shtml —Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.233.214.47 (talk) 02:16, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  President? 

message: There is merged template but, in this Discussion page, has no merge opinion. So, i will delete this merge template. Would i can delete the template?--Altostratus (talk) 06:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  discussion for merge 

message: Just wondering, are the subheaders under History necessary? I just thought I should discuss before doing anything about them; there's recently been an edit war over them, so I hear, and I don't wish to step on anyone's foot accidentally. --Ryanasaurus007 (talk) 03:36, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Headers 
Talk:Padirac Cave

message: Apokrif (talk) 22:59, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes 2A00:23C4:F780:8701:A49F:B1B4:BC0:4FC8 (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we use the same word ("cave" or "chasm") in the article title and the lead?
Talk:Grotte des Demoiselles

message: 300 meters = 980 years?  Did you mean 980 feet?  If so, it would be better to say "1000 feet", since it's an approximation anyway.  I'm not editing the article to correct this because I suppose it's possible that you did mean 980 years, as in "the stream has now eroded 300 meters down over 980 years".  But if it is indeed a typo please fix.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.32.223.128 (talk) 04:47, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Anchor handling tug supply vessel

message: Propose merge: Platform supply vessel.  This page is unneeded.  According to the linked page, an anchor handling tug supply vessel is an "Offshore Supply vessel specially designed to provide anchor handling services and tow offshore platforms, barges and production modules/vessels. The AHTS is equipped for fire fighting, rescue operations and oil recovery.".  The platform supply vessel page specifically mentions that many other jobs not mentioned are performed by PSV's.--Dj245 (talk) 21:26, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A AHTS is definitely not the same as a PSV. BoH (talk) 07:44, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

message: The article's three references are all dead; fortunately, there are archived copies. This Kongsberg page may yield some good information in its links to individual AHTS designs. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 07:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Cimetière parisien de Bagneux

message: This article looks like it has alot of potential. I advise finding a photo, and inserting a cemetery infobox. See Template:Infobox cemetery. Good luck. Boneyard90 (talk) 04:31, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: WP:Death Commentary

message: I have reported (linked to CWGC website) British Commonwealth war graves in the military section of the cemetery. Those who know are welcome to add numbers of other nationalities (if any) about which I have no information.Cloptonson (talk) 22:11, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: War Graves
Talk:Cimetière parisien de Pantin

message: I am adding mention of World War I British war graves in this cemetery, which are registered and maintained by the Commonwealth War Graves Commission (CWGC).  Those with access to French data can add mention of French war graves (which may be those marked by standard crosses in background of a photo on the CWGC website).Cloptonson (talk) 19:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: War Graves

message: Contrary to initial reports of a possible antisemitic desecration of Jewish graves, the November 2012 incident turned out to be about people stealing gold teeth and the city assured that no desecration had occurred.  I've removed the corresponding paragraph in the article since it was incorrect and since the incident is really a blip on the radar for the largest cemetery around Paris. (see WP:UNDUE) Pichpich (talk) 21:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antisemitic desecration
Talk:Fremantle Declaration

message: First time I have created a wikipedia page, so I apologise for any errors. --Anthropoidape 01:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You did well.  Thanks for the page.  I'm an expat Aussie and apparently missed mention of the signing of this document so I'm glad to see it has an article. Robert Brockway 00:27, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: comment

message: Interesting to see that nasty Philip Ruddock refused to sign it!
--PeterMarkSmith 23:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good Job [[User:Anthropoidape|Anthropoidape]]
Talk:Aubergenville

message: Why is there no caption below the photo of the Monument aux morts – ?? — Sca (talk) 18:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing caption
Talk:Yab Yum (brothel)

message: Okay, it's been closed for a year now - what is the current status?  What is it used for?  Does Hennie Vittali (alleged Hells Angels front man) still own it?  Anybody living in it?  Did they sell it and release the full value of it?  If so, what was the sales price if anybody knows.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.54.161 (talk) 15:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status???
Talk:Maurice Davis (rabbi)

message: This article refers to a "President's Commission on Equal Opportunity." There was no such commission. Rabbi Davis may have been a member of the President's Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity, but he was never the chairman. During the Kennedy administration, Vice President Johnson served as chairman. During the Johnson administration, Secretary of Labor W. Willard Wirtz presided until the election of Hubert H. Humphrey as vice president, at which point Vice President Humphrey became chairman until the Committee was abolished in the fall of 1965.
The link leads the the article on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, which lists Rabbi Davis as the first chairman in 1965. That too is erroneous. The first chairman was Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Jr., who was succeeded in 1966 by Stephen M. Shulman.
I will make the necessary changes to both pages.
Dave Golland (talk) 21:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: President's Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity

message: I removed the myspace page since Rabbi Bahir Davis now has an official webpage and it seems he has since abandoned the use of the myspace. It appears no one has logged in since August and the blogs have not been updated since December 2008 while the new webpage and blog have been updated recently. That is why it was deleted as it seems to be out of date and a duplicate for the official website. THDju (talk) 02:43, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair enough! Dave Golland (talk) 14:42, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Dave :) THDju (talk) 20:29, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: removal of the myspace page

message: I don't know who modified the date of death but speaking as his granddaughter, he passed on Dec 14th. Other than being there, here is his obituary - http://www.nytimes.com/1993/12/16/obituaries/rabbi-maurice-davis-a-cult-authority-72.html stating that he passed on Tuesday and the obit is dated the 16th. & here http://www.icsahome.com/logon/elibdocview_new.asp?Subject=In+Memoriam%3A+Rabbi+Maurice+Davis
And I wanted to thank everyone who has contributed to his article. Thank you for helping catalog his life. He was very special to us but also to the lives he touched. Tweetums81 (talk) 05:48, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No offense meant. Verification of family status is difficult with an anonymous user name. Please feel free to change the date, but add the reference. Dave Golland (talk) 00:42, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: None taken at all. I didn't change it initially but when I saw it changed I wanted to comment. :) Tweetums81 (talk) 19:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Date Change
Talk:Postal codes in France

message: The text under CEDEX says "The third figure (5) is for the Ve arrondissement".  The third digit is not 5?
81.145.141.98 (talk) 15:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that the contributor meant that the "05" at the end of the line is the arrondissement. I will try to clarify this.DisappointedHorse (talk) 09:14, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake under CEDEX

message: The equivalent French version mentions in bold that the first two digits are not the department number but the department in which the nearest distributor is. You could live in one department but your mail might come from another department if you're near the border for example. 
Why no commas?
In case anyone wonders why I removed all the commas between the house number and the street name: that is the correct way to write an address.
See here on the website of La Poste for their full recommendations on how to write an address: 
I first heard of this in 2003, but it's only slowly becoming more commonplace - old habits die hard.
--Trickyb 19:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake?

message: Most other lists of postcodes are called "Postcodes in Country". I have moved this page to Postcodes in France, but it has been moved back. Can we agree to follow the convention and move again to Postcodes in France?SQB (talk) 10:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Postal codes" vs "Postcodes"
Talk:Preca

message: This article is gains most of its content unreservedly and without alteration from the society website, which means that it is mostly vandalized. This is evinced by the structure, which is identical to that of the correctly named George Preca article which was recently rewritten for having been vandalized and incredibly POV. This brings up a second issue, namely, that a better-named and better written article exists for the same subject at George Preca. Lastly, it is an orphan. See Talk:George Preca. Alekjds talk 06:31, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion
Talk:Balloon carrier

message: I wikified and tried to cleanup this article. One of the most unusual things was that the article appeared to contradict itself regarding the first use of a balloon carrier. The article seemed to claim that the Austrian Navy ship Vulcano and the Union (United States) ship George Washington Parke Custis were both first. It did not make sense because the American Civil War (1861–1865) occurred long after the 1849 use of the Vulcano. The article did not provide any additional information that may have validated the claim of the George Washington Parke Custis being some kind of first, such as the first use of a balloon carrier for reconnaissance or the first balloon carrier to use a gas balloon rather than a hot air balloon. Therefore, I took out the claim of it being the first use. -- Kjkolb (talk) 03:11, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Baltimore Clipper

message: Could someone provide a source for the Californian to be a Baltimore clipper? Otherwise I'm sorry to say that I'll delete the picture in this article. Thanks, Ibn Battuta 03:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Californian a Baltimore clipper? 

message: Are we sure that describing slaves as 'low-density, perishable cargo' is appropriate?  they were human beings after all. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikigreenwood (talk • contribs) November 30, 2007
:I agree 100%.  What's a better way to word that sentence?  Would something like the following be less insensitive but still accurate?
:They were especially suited to moving low-density, high value perishable cargoes.  They were  frequently used to transport slaves, and in that trade operated as far afield as the west coast of Africa.
:-- Avocado 01:57, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appropriate description of slaves? 

message: There is nothing about the design of the Baltimore clipper type that is inherently unstable. A ship that would ordinarily capsize in port would not be able to sail in any condition whatsoever. If such a capsize did occur it would certainly be due to being under ballasted. Ballast stones are routinely removed and replaced to compensate for the addion or subtraction of cargoes. If, for example, a ships cargo was removed and it was not reballasted before a storm the ship might be easily knocked down. Though this would be the case for virtually any equivalent vessel of that era. Danielrjansen (talk) 04:15, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gardiner 1999? 

message: Wikipedia requires sentence case. I cannot move it due to existing page at destination. Equinox ◑ 16:05, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move page to [[Baltimore clipper]]
Talk:Felix Houphouet Boigny Stadium

message: Is there someone who has a picture of this stadium actually. The renovations are over and this stadium was inaugurated one week ago. AncientEgyptFan (talk) 15:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stadium picture after renovation
Talk:Universal National Service Act

message: Rangel has said in several interviews that he introduced HR 163 because he believed minorities were being disproportionately affected by the war in Iraq, and that he believed that the current volunteer system encourages a rush to war by people whose loved ones are not put at risk (the "send Barbara and Jenna argument"). In my opinion, this article is rather one-sided, as only referencing the conspiracy theories of Republican columnists. I have made a start on balancing the article, by adding a quote from Rangel. However, I don't have the time at the moment to find all the sources to support this, but I will try to do so (and would appreciate help on the matter). Mateo SA | talk 05:36, Oct 23, 2004 (UTC)
I removed:
:Some commentators opined that the bill figured in a “scare campaign” to convince US voters that Republicans (or specifically the White House) had secret plans to re-institute conscription after the Nov. 2 elections. For example, John Sutherland, a columnist for The Guardian, claimed on May 31, 2004 that the bill is “currently approved and sitting in the Committee for Armed Services”. William Hawkins, a columnist for The Washington Times, denies that the bill was ever approved and claims that when Republicans brought it to the floor on October 5, it was for the express purpose of killing it.
We cannot just say "some commentators opined", specific references are necessary. - SimonP 16:37, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
i agree this article seems very biased. i am no expert in the subject but it seems that the author has brought in biased political opinion. the last section that quotes Obama seems like it has been taken out of context and doesn't have as much to do with a draft as it has to do with him calling out the nation to unite. anyway, perhaps there should be added the republican candidate's side to the issue. unless it is agreed that the section be taken out entirely. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.197.249.62 (talk) 09:42, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Republican bias in this article

message: I've just removed the mention of Time editor Richard Stengel from the introduction; whomever added his name to the list of supporters has mistaken this legislation for a similarly-titled bill, on behalf of which he did testify. As explained in this section of his biographical article, that was H.R. 1388 and is actually much different. There was no citation here; there are citations over there. It's worth noting briefly that I do have a potential conflict with Stengel as a topic, as explained here, but I trust that this is an obviously non-controversial edit. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 18:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor deletion 

message: Just wanted to alert others that this morning I heard that a new bill has been introduced by Rep. Rangel
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-1152
Asking for help getting more cites before adding to this page (Rep. Rangel referred to it as the 2011 Universal National Service Act in an interview on March 18, 2011)69.129.149.202 (talk) 18:02, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  2011 bill
Talk:Powernext

message: Schwintowski - Handbuch Energiehandel (p. 356-360) ISBN: 978-3-503-15438-8
This literatur is in german and needs translation. Schwintowski elaborates the history of the European Energy Exchange (EEX) and mentions Powernext and the EEX as a key kollaboration for european power spot markets. 134.106.59.4 (talk) 08:52, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible literatur
Talk:Apaches (subculture)

message: The Apache Shirt link has been vaporized so what was it (the shirt)? I'm assuming black and white striped cuz of the illustration. So many things are making sense to me now that I've never put together before, like Martin Atkins, drummer from MINISTRY, always wears a black & white striped shirt when he plays drums and I've always kinda wondered what the deal was. Hanz ofbyotch (talk) 19:27, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apache Shirt 

message: Do you mean Verlan? --Error (talk) 17:37, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  La langue verte