lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Blean

message: To call this a civil parish is rubbish! It is the name of the parish church, and therefore is a religious parish. Civil parishes only came into being in the late 19th century - this one is at least ten centuries old. It is this sort of thing that is beginning to give Wiki a bad name. Peter Shearan 16:10, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Whatever

message: Every other entry on the page does have a blue link—an article dedicated to the topic or an article link in the description that users can navigate to. Your entry lacks either one. There is no article for the podcast, no article for Brian Atlas, nowhere for users to go to find more information. Wikipedia disambiguation pages index information available on Wikipedia. An entry with no link doesn't belong. Adding a dab page entry is not a substitute for article creation or improvement. As I indicated in one of my edit summaries, if this topic is notable, then create an article. —ShelfSkewed Talk 21:25, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There are many entries here that don’t have blue links nor are connected to any other articles… and btw I did create the article https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whatever_(Channel). (Discopleasant (talk) 21:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Really? Which entries lack blue links? I must be missing them. —ShelfSkewed Talk 21:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I took a good second look at the list and found that although not the title themselves have blue links, their descriptions do. I remember in disambiguation lists it was allowed to have entries with no blue link. This is my first time editing Wikipedia after a long time so I apologize. (Discopleasant (talk) 21:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Podcast
Talk:Jamnagar district

message: Jamnagar 2409:4041:E05:B265:0:0:8A8A:FE07 (talk) 12:37, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dera chhikari
Talk:Turan

message: Diana_marlisto is vandalizing this page with pan-Turkism propaganda. Be very cautious of this user. 
--Sickofthisbs (talk) 13:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pan-Turks are vandalizing and distorting this article with their fictional history books. 

message: Why is the dehkhoda marked as an inadequate source and that a better source is needed? It is arguably the most reliable Persian dictionary of modern times ParsaPbt (talk) 13:21, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dehkhoda source 

message: When the Turks used this term, or name. They even gave this name to a region of the Mediterranean Sea.
Y = u
Tyrhennia/Turhannia
Like Odin said he came from Tyrkland, Turkland.
....There was no Iran, back then. Iran was many time ruled by Turks.
Iranians are in the farrest history even Turks, read and learn and educate yourself before making the truth dirty, and a lie.
Gene D. Matlock - What Strange Mystery Unites the Turkish Nations, India, Catholicism, and Mexico? 89.205.128.211 (talk) 10:19, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: imagine arguing and making up so much lies that no one even entertains you panturkists anymore, imagine having such a sad history that you have you in Europe to call yourselfs the original blond haired and blue eyed europeans and in persia the original children of iran, i am waiting for the day your people will say cyrus the great was a turk. 46.251.152.200 (talk) 10:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turan - Is Turkic, not Iranian. 

message: The Article must contain all of the beliefs and theories and not focus on one source of information, Turkic people have different opinions about Turan and it's bold enough to be mentioned in the article which positively effects the Turco-Persian argument going on about the article and the ongoing edit-war 
No sources or beliefs are considered to be 100% right about a historical article so do not attempt to delete or undo the added information even if the details are in opposition with the confirmed text of the article
All opinions and theories must be contained in historical articles considering that all sources are not completely right.
please do not change the information contained in the edit and let all theories to be discussed. IlyaSurkhayovic (talk) 18:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Please read WP:RS, WP:CS and WP:UNDUE. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @HistoryofIran The Sources were mentioned in the article IlyaSurkhayovic (talk) 19:04, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Where? The primary source (WP:PST) you just cited with no pages? . Stop edit warring and read our rules. The sourced sections of this article clearly contradicts what you're trying to add, which is essentially psuedo-history. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Turkification of Turan
Talk:Sabarkantha district

message: The entire body of text under  is copy-pasted from this source. This is a copyright violation. Interested editors are welcome to make the necessary amendments to . If none are made in a couple of days, the section will be deleted.Deccantrap (talk) 20:24, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Festivals - Copyright violation
Talk:Surat district

message: No citations, or mentions of metrics being used to make this quantification. This claim needs to be qualified or removed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.36.85.56 (talk) 07:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second most advanced district in Gujarat?
Talk:Surendranagar district

message: I completed a copy edit of this page.  I restored links to the Census data, as they seem to work, and added more data to the infobox from the Census records.  It looks like there will be a new census in 2011, so that data should be updated next year. I deleted a fair amount of non-WP:NPOV text, especially from the Tourism section, but it still reads like a travel brochure.  It needs cleanup, preferably with attention paid to English translations of non-English terms.  I also deleted some commented text that looked promotional.// Macwhiz (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit

message: Are all these businesses really notable enough to warrant inclusion in an international encyclopedia?  I noticed not a one of them has their own article. That seems to imply that the answer is "no."  This list seems like it may be more about promoting than informing. // Macwhiz (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Pursuant to the ideals of WP:SPAM, I have deleted the list of businesses.  None of them were notable; it appears that it was mostly a vanity list, and that has no place in an encyclopedia. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 04:39, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Businesses

message: The People section seems to be about Surendranagar city, not the district.  Can someone verify this and delete it if needed? // Macwhiz (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: People

message: This section looks like a laundry list.  It makes little sense, especially if you don't already know what these things are.  Does it really belong in an encyclopedia article?  If it does, it should be turned into a definition list that includes details on each dish: what it's comprised of, why it's notable, etc. // Macwhiz (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Since I made the previous comment, various editors have tacked more "delicacies" onto the laundry list, without any context or attribution.  The inclusion of items in the list without sources violates, among other policies, WP:LISTV.  The list itself had become a laundry list, so I removed it.  Before the content is restored, it should be sourced and placed into context, preferably in prose. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 03:12, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Delicacies

message: I think legends are notable, but the legend included here is not only unsourced, it's vague.  Is it really that notable?  If it's notable, perhaps it should have its own article instead? // Macwhiz (talk) 21:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Legends
Category talk:Hip hop

message: this category, which I created, should be moved to Category:Hip-hop.  Why? because of the dictionary spelling, and the acceptance of the hyphen spelling by many figures in the hip-hop community like Kool Moe Dee and KRS-ONE. Urthogie 19:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You didn't creae this category. And it's fine with or without the hyphen. Hyphenation is really a non-issue. --FuriousFreddy 17:47, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Hip hop
Talk:Treacle protein

message: Some text in this article was originally taken from http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/gene=tcof1 (public domain)
The link to treacle is wrong and does not point to anything related to genetics.Carrionluggage 03:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: OK, so I get the Treac- part, but any reason for the -le other than typical inappropriate gene researcher humour (cf. Sonic Hedgehog et al)? If there is, I seem to have missed it. 146.199.0.216 (talk) 01:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  reason for name?
Talk:Charles A. Lockwood

message: Lockwood also passed on Ultra from Hypo to his boats, contrary to USN policy; I don't recall if this first went from Holmes to CoS Dick Voge under CAL or English, however.  Trekphiler 16:31, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Span (unit)

message: I removed the following paragraph:
In Swahili, the analogue of span is unguru. It is the width from the tip of the thumb to the tip of the middle finger.
; 1 unguru :~ 6 fungu'lu
:~ 8 inches
:~ 0.21  m
This is likely a hoax entry, see this slashdot post. I am currently contacting Swahili speakers. AxelBoldt 16:32, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact, in Swahili it is called "shibiri". You can check it here. --83.35.138.204 22:28, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Or on Swahili Wikipedia. --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 17:51, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

message: The English foot (0.3048 m) is substantially longer than the adult male human foot (0.263 m per a source cited in Foot#Human foot). The discrepancy comes from the foot actually being the length of a rigid shoe. However, the hand is seldom covered rigidly in such a manner. So where does the discrepancy between a human span (about 0.20 m) and the unit span (0.23 m) come from? --Damian Yerrick (talk | stalk) 03:04, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  12 inches my foot
Talk:John Tempesta

message: Johns beats are the coolest ever
Since joining the Cult, John has filled their sound tremendously and his playing ability and technique is ever more audiable and this is when you realise he is truly a talanted drummer and performer.
=====================================================
Was he previously known as Joey Tempesta?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.159.140 (talk) 16:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was he previously known as Joey Tempesta?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.42.159.140 (talk) 16:58, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: =========================================
Talk:Emilio Grau Sala

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.schillerandbodo.com/view_image.html?image_no=326. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  VernoWhitney (talk) 21:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: There is no proof of the statement that this painter was famous. Creichmann (talk) 16:20, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where are the references?
Talk:Touched by the Hand of God

message: I've removed the song meaning section, as it was just ridiculous.  The song and lyrics - which can be read through here - have nothing to do with the Maradonna goal.  The only connection they share is the term "hand of God".  A previous version commenting on Sumner's marriage breakup is more plausible, but also unsourced.  Chaheel Riens (talk) 10:05, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Song meaning" 
Talk:The Bots Master

message: I've completely rewritten the article; because of the cleanup notice placed on it. The previous summary and cast list were lifted straight from IMBb, so I've had to remove those. Y control 16:51, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Twillisjr (talk) 11:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Request
Wikipedia talk:Press releases/Nature compares Wikipedia and Britannica

message: Is the quote real, or could we improve on it? I would use something about aiming for Britannica-or-better quality, since that's something Jimmy has said on several occasions. --Michael Snow 16:59, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: yes, you can improve it. But please be modest ;-) --Elian Talk 17:17, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I think it's modest. Maybe even too much so, I don't know. Anyway, I don't have any more changes in mind at this point. --Michael Snow 17:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Sure. --Michael Snow 17:45, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Depends. In the german wikipedia it was never necessary to protect a press release but I don't know how efficient the vandal patrol on en is. In case of doubt, protect it, I'd say. --Elian Talk 17:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Cavalry in the American Civil War

message: Note that Buford, although fighting dismounted as did mounted infantry, followed standard cavalry procedures and formations (videttes, skirmish lines with cavalry spacing, etc.). The article implies that he used mounted infantry tactics, which involved standard infantry formations (often with massed troops in double rank) and the usage of rifles. Perhaps, the best example of mounted infantry tactics at Gettysburg was Jenkins' brigade on East Cavalry Field. Scott Mingus 12:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and make your proposed changes, but I'd recommend that you choose a famous example, rather than assuming Gettysburg is the operative point in this example. I doubt that many readers of this article would have any familiarity with Jenkins. Hal Jespersen 18:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mounted Infantry

message: I removed a sentence that had a citation request:
: Under typical conditions on the march, cavalry could cover 35 miles (56 km) in an eight-hour day.
I originally wrote this article based in no small part on notes I took at a 2005 cavalry seminar at the Civil War Institute at Gettysburg College. I have been unable to find a printed secondary source for a citation, so I have removed the sentence until someone can find one. Hal Jespersen (talk) 21:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Equipment 

message: Under ‘Confederate Cavalry’, you say: Furthermore, Southern society was more stratified, which made the soldiers more accustomed to a hierarchy of command and were generally considered more suited to the martial lifestyle. That seems to reflect the Southern military spirit in general, not specifically cavalrymen. 
I might suggest instead: Southern society was more rural, with the young men more naturally accustomed to the riding and shooting life. Valetude (talk) 19:33, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confederate cavalry
Talk:Penrose method

message: Here is a CSV file that you can use to do your own Penrose analysis. It uses data from List of countries by population as of December 15, 2005. At the bottom are world totals. See Talk:Penrose method/CSV Captain Zyrain 17:57, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Talk:Penrose method/CSV]]

message: Is it just me, or is everyone else seeing that this list shows fractional seats? The article doesn't propose any method for rounding these numbers. Wouter Lievens 13:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you want to update? Tomeasy T C 10:30, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

text: I do not see why we should add the voting powers allocated by a proportional method to this article. For comparison? This comparison can well be made by just looking at the percentage of population with the percentage of weighting power. Tomeasy T C 15:26, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Fractional...

message: # Does this article really need the 200 row table detailing countries' populations and their Penrose numbers?  I'm not an expert in Wikipedia mark-up, but is there some way to minimize (and to expand) the table on demand?  Give it another, related page?
# An account of Penrose's reasoning would be much more illuminating than just the results.  Does anyone have the mathematical background for this?
--75.15.153.109 08:51, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information vs. filler 

message: :
You don't say … —Tamfang (talk) 19:36, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  time keeps on slippin'
Talk:Jackson family

message: la Toya jackson has repeatedly accused her father of molesting both her and Janet, as well as her mother of being complicit in this abuse. I feel there should be a separate section devoted to these allegations. JointCompound (talk) 08:01, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: they were all abused its so sad brothers and the sisters /aaliyah 2601:C2:4000:6C:9938:3E29:83A0:64CA (talk) 14:26, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  section on father's alleged sexual abuse? 

message: How about this? I don't know how you would do the females.
* July "Jack" Gale
** Israel Nero
*** Samuel Joseph
**** Joseph Walter
***** Maureen Reillette "Rebbie"
****** Austin Brown
***** Sigmund Esco "Jackie"
****** Sigmund Esco "Siggy"
******* Jared Esco
***** Toriano Adaryll "Tito"
****** Toriano Adaryll "Taj"
******* Taylor Aurora Sco
***** Jermaine La Jaune
****** Jermaine La Jaune "Jay"
***** La Toya Yvonne
***** Marlon David
****** Valencia Caroline
******* Noah Laniak
***** Brandon
***** Michael Joseph
****** Michael Joseph ″Prince″
****** Paris
****** Prince Michael II
***** Steven Randall "Randy"
****** Genevieve Katherine
***** Janet Damita Jo
****** Eissa Al Mana
**** Verna Mae
**** Lula Mae
**** Lawrence
**** Martin Luther
*** James
*** Jane
 92.71.60.62 (talk) 13:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  New/replacement section?
Talk:Ravelstein

message: Yuck, this article is weak and entropic. What critics? I am glad we know that Bellow "never wrote the perfect novel", without wikipedia that would never come to light. Too POV to be useful. Where is the long view of Bellows other novels too? Overall shabbily rendered.--Mikerussell 17:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to make the article worthy of the subject and not just some loose thoughts by someone patching together a stub-filler.--Mikerussell 18:49, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: it ain't great, but I think it is a little better, and maybe somebody else can go further .--Mikerussell 18:49, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Added info box and I heavily edited the article, some of the stuff was so badly written I had a hard time believing it- percisely because I think I was the one who poured out the slop months ago, but there was also a lot of additional material from a new editor. Some of the material I tried to synthesis in the "The text" section, but a lot I simply edited out. There was in my opinion too much subjective opinion, not that it was uninteresting opinion or off-topic slander, to the contrary it was interesting stuff, but suitable for a book club coffee clutch not a wikipedia article. The comparisons were too personal and quite frankly difficult to completely understand- again, the stuff of good conversation- as in 'why would you say that', but not here in an encyclopedia entry. If the writer can amend it to make it more generic and objective, he is welcome to re-add. At least that is my opinion, and if i had more time i'd look over more but now I got to go. --Mikerussell 05:21, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:K. G. Griffiths]] additions 

message: "Although Bloom, in the wake of his literary stardom, at a Harvard University gathering, published in Giants & Dwarfs, that he was not a conservative, though he was much admired by right-wing publications, like William F. Buckley, Jr's National Review."
This sentence many clauses but regrettably no verb. -- Antaeus Feldspar 18:13, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm all out of gold stars, off to Grand & Toy for a big box for Antaeus. Fix it, geez.--Mikerussell 00:38, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  sentence without a verb
Talk:Pita Pit

message: Do you think Pita Pit could have better business if they revised the intellectually defective appearance of those characters? Look at the characters from Veggie Tales. They look 75-100 IQ points higher than the Pita Pit characters. If Pita Pit could use those instead, their business would flourish! --Shultz 17:11, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Jikji

message: Somebody please fix my clumsy translation.  -- Visviva 11:21, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The translation "The Monk Baegun's Anthology of the Great Priests' Teachings on Identification of the Buddha’s Spirit by the Practice of Seon" listed in the lead does not match the native text in the side box. Is there a more complete native title? --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 09:40, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: My brief searches doesn't show a longer native text title, so I will take the liberty of changing the English translation to "Anthology of Great Buddhist Priests' Zen Teachings" because this is the translation recorded by UNESCO in the official register. --PalaceGuard008 (Talk) 06:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation 

message: It might sound stupid, but I'm serious.
I saw the link which links to the 'Gutenberg Bible' in the frame 'See Also' at the Jikji article, but there is not the link to Jikji in the Gutenberg Bible article. Why is that? Garypark (talk) 11:19, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Not stupid. I've added a See also link there. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 17:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the link 

message: — Assignment last updated by ChoiJaeyoung (talk) 14:15, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Public Writing C1