lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of International cricket families

message: Isn't there a list of these in Wisden somewhere? jguk 08:39, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, there is, but I can't find it.  On a separate matter, is it correct to have this page where it currently is?  Would it not be better to have it at List of test cricket families?  And Shane Lee hasn't played Tests, I think.  Smoddy (t) (e) 17:28, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

text: Yes. Final Test, 1997 Ashes series.  Adam played in more – I believe Ben also played in Murali's Test the following year.  Smoddy (t) (e) 18:47, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *Thanks for your comments.  Moved to List of Test cricket families (with redirect). Added Hollioake and removed Lee (Shane did not play in a test - my error). - Ianbrown 00:49, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: *Expanded to List of Test or One-day International cricket families and put Brett Lee and Shane Lee (as ODI player) back in. - Ianbrown 01:17, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: other sources?

message: I believe that Kenya and Bangladesh do have lots of brothers and cousins. I can't recall the names at the moment. :( Yeah, Namibia too had the Burger brothers (and another sibling pair) but I've forgotten the names. Nichalp 19:04, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
:See the cricinfo link on the page for Test relations - there are lots, many more than mentioned here!  There is also a comprehensive list of Test families in Wisden, if you have a copy.  If you include ODIs, I'm sure the list will be very long. -- ALoan (Talk) 19:45, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  More families 

message: This list was started before T20 was around.  Propose moving to List of International cricketers' families (is my apostrophe right?) and changing lead accordingly.  Opposed to inclusion of U19 players though as that may open the door a bit wide. Any comments?  –Moondyne 00:22, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: –Moondyne 23:37, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Twenty20?

message: This article fails the criteria for stand alone lists of having a clearly defined inclusion criteria. Active Banana  (bananaphone 13:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The inclusion criteria is very clear:  Cricketers related by family who have played Test, ODI or T20 matches.  I don't know how to make it any plainer.  –Moondyne 08:47, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Fails [[WP:LIST]]

message: Perhaps this article's name could be changed to "List of international cricketers who are related" or "List of related international cricketers", which could then be divided into categories such as Father/Son, Brothers, Brothers-in-law, etc. I don't think just two cousins or even two brothers could be called a "cricket family". Bozzio (talk) 11:58, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name
Talk:Renaldo and the Loaf

message: I feel like i have corrected this site a couple of times wrt Dave & Brians' professions. I know Brian personally, he is an architect in the south of England. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.45.12.103 (talk) 01:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You've still got to source it, though; otherwise the information comes from nowhere. -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 19:32, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  professions
Talk:List of anarchist concepts

message: I've added "freeganism" to the list, as it has much in common with anarchist tactics. --Jazz Remington 10:02, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)

message: I'm going to put this idea out there so we can have some kind of discussion on it before I do anything hasty. In creating the list of basic anarchism topics, I completely duplicated the work on this list.  Though it was not my intention, I've all but merged it and rendered this page moot.  I think we can safely redirect this page to that list.  I bring it up now because we didn't have time to discuss a merge proposal before I did it.  Now is the time to object.  I'll wait a bit so people can argue the merits of having a main list.  If no one cares, or we generally agree, I'll go ahead and perform the redirect.--Cast (talk) 23:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no question that the articles should be merged.  Discussion for uncontroversial redirects (i.e. when no content is lost) not strictly necessary. The only question is at which page the merged article should be located. This is a consistency issue as far as I am concerned, if including "basic" in the title is a Wikipedia norm for political philosophy topic lists, then by all means redirect. Skomorokh incite 23:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just overly cautious, I suppose.  I'll just jump to it.  And yes, "basic" is a part of the list title format.--Cast (talk) 01:44, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect
Talk:List of Greek films

message: A request to Greek speakers: please add the original Greek titles to these movies, after the English version of the title -- or vice versa. Also, if there is a corresponding list on the Greek-language Wikipedia, could you please add an inter-language link to it? -- The Anome 10:21, Mar 3, 2005 (UTC)
Also, see :el:Κινηματογράφος -- The Anome 18:24, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
What about: Mama Mia, The Two Faces of January, The Journey....they were all filmed in Greece1.120.157.27 (talk) 01:47, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence

message: Possible blurbs for DYK:
Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence begun by assassination attempt survivor James Brady won a $2.5 million civil settlement in the 2002 Beltway Sniper Attacks from a gun dealer and manufacturer?
"The NCCH was re-named Handgun Control, Inc. from 1980 until 2001." 
Were they funded privately or by grants from the Federal Government?
What is this large banner "Gun Interest Groups in the U.S." that covers the text?  I've seen it at several locations besides this article.
ArmedCitizen 16:13, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

message: This article reads like a puff piece or press release and should probably be merged with Brady Campaign.  Not really enough info for seperate srticles. K1ng l0v3 20:16, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV
Talk:Pseudofossil

message: Are naturally produced pseudofossils really lumped together with manmade fakes as our article suggests? --Wetman 11:08, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've always used or known the term as a natural chunk o' stuff that looked like it could have been a fossil. That's why I made the fraud heading to distinguish. May need more clarifying though. Vsmith 12:24, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed Piltdown Man and other references to manufactured fossils. By definition, pseudofossils are inorganic objects that resemble fossils. Piltdown Man includes real organic fossil material, but is a fake because it is a collection of unrelated remains that were planted in a location where they didn't belong. A fossil fake -yes; pseudofossil - no. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zamphuor (talk • contribs) 13:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Another thing - why is this page connected to "WikiProject Paranormal". If no one offers a good explanation (other than there is an unproved link between the hoax and Arthur Conan Doyle, not even mentioned on this page, and that ACD happened to be interested in the paranormal) I'll remove it shortly. --Zamphuor 14:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Removed. Vsmith 03:09, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fakes

message: I think dubiofossil should be merged into this article. What are your thoughts? --Harizotoh9 (talk) 05:52, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so.  They are distinct.  Dubiofossil is to pseudofossil as UFO is to aeroplane.  150.203.35.193 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 07:25, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Hiring

message: I suggest we replace this article with a redirect to recruitment.
As it stands, however, this article does mention that discrimination and its prevention are issues in recruitment - and the current recruitment article doesn't say anything about this. So perhaps one of us could add something about discrimination to the existing recruitment article - and then we can replace hiring with the redirect. Would anyone mind this? Thanks Squashy 23:19, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect to recruitment
Talk:Behemoth

message: A recent edit was reverted because it cited something which was not a reliable resource. I have no problem with calling a creationist not a reliable resource on a fact, but - as I understand it - the creationist was cited as being a reliable resource on there being creationists who believe such-and-such. Or is this a case of "original research" - that one must cite for belief in such and such, not someone who believes it, but a secondary, reliable source which says "there are people who believe this"? Guidance and clarification are welcome.    TomS TDotO (talk) 13:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about reliable source 

message: "Both beasts are chaos monsters destroyed by the deity at the time of creation, although such a conflict is not found in the Genesis creation narrative." Where does this claim come from? I don't see this in the description in Job, the book appears to describe them as contemporaries of Job. This doesn't seem to fit with the description here of later Jewish writings either.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.50.246.140 (talk) 08:54, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The bit in question cites   If Peterson lifted our phrasing, that's his credibility's problem, not ours. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chaos monsters destroyed at creation? 

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Elephant monster. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  signed, Rosguill talk 04:38, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elephant monster listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Behemoth is obviously (for me at least) related to בְּהֵמָה, in agreement with this Wikitionary entry. 188.218.87.87 (talk) 10:19, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behemah  

message: The early parts of this article claim this. Also, the mentioned "Thessalonians 2:8" lines up with neither the first nor second book of Thessalonians, and is surely not correct. 163.53.144.1 (talk) 06:31, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The beast of Revelation is nowhere implied to be the Behemoth
Template talk:Template link

message: Description of suggested change:
Please add a nocat value, especially when adding this template adds the page into unintended categories. I couldn't give examples. Toadette (Merry Christmas, and a happy new year) 15:02, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: This template does not add any categories to any page. Primefac (talk) 15:08, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 4 January 2024
Talk:Jim Geraghty

message: User:Gamaliel removed "Geraghty was actively involved in reporting the Killian documents and Rathergate story on a daily basis on behalf of National Review Online. Geraghty was one of the self described Pajamahadeen."
I certainly had the impression that TKS was a go-to site for updates on this story. "The Kerry Spot" was explicitly focused on campaign issues. —wwoods 17:20, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Killian documents 

message: This article was rather out of date. I've done a quick edit, but more (and better) work is needed.
While checking Amazon for books by "Jim Geraghty", I found CICS Concepts and Uses (Mcgraw Hill, 1993, ). Does anyone know whether it's by this Jim Geraghty? Cheers, CWC 13:05, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007 
Talk:Transformer (disambiguation)

message: I added "The Transformers" of Pacific Northwest native myth; but the link attached to it goes to "Transformers (toyline)".  I can't figure out how to create a separate page for something that already has a name-word referring to something else . . . . advice?  
Skookum1 22:22, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added a link to a page where you can fill in information about the transformers myth.  If you look at the source, you can see how the article name differs from the linking text.
Speight 03:08, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone has created an article based on a version of the name of the primary transformer in Lummi, see Talk:Xelas.Skookum1 (talk) 11:59, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native myth 

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
It doesn't make sense to have the disambig for the term "transformer" at Transformers. Many of the links in question don't apply. For instance, Lou Reed's album would never be referred to as "Transformers". The page should be moved to a more appropriate disambig. Transformers is very commonly used to refer to the toy / cartoon / comic franchise and so should go directly there. Chris Cunningham 16:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: *Transformers does indeed also refer to more than one electrical voltage-changer, but the disambiguation page for "Transformer" should not be at the plural version of the name, but rather at the singular version. Having the disambiguation page at the plural creates issues with  articles that include Transformer, but are only referred to in the singular and never in the plural. --Bobblehead (rants) 19:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article has been renamed  as the result of a move request. --Stemonitis 16:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Terry Nichols

message: I changed the type of terrorist in the lede from domestic to Christian, and added a reliable source supporting the assertion that the OKC bombing was an act of Christian terrorism due to the perpetrators' ties (possibly indirect and circumstantial, granted, but ties nonetheless) to Christian Identity. Those changes were reverted and I disagree with that decision. Groupthink (talk) 02:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: See my first comment here  Springee (talk) 11:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

text: Your own comment "" precludes the solidity needed to identify this as "Christian" terrorism.  You have to show, without WP:SYNTH, that the motivation was religious and not simply political.  You have yet to show that in a meaningful way.  And, don't take this the wrong way, but I think it stems from a lack of understanding of CI and how it inter-relates with other extremists. ButlerBlog (talk) 13:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Christian terrorist
Talk:Ross Bagdasarian Jr.

message: On 25 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ross Bagdasarian, Jr. for a record of the discussion.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Korath (talk • contribs) 13:21, 3 March 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: from Vfd

message: why couldn't he play Dave?? this makes no sense to me.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegreatandpowerfulsimonseville (talk • contribs) 20:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: from thegreatandpowerfulsimonseville

message: It says he died Died August 20, 2006 (age 15). Is that true? And how can he be 15 years old, dead, and 59 at the same time?
Antimatter15 (talk) 20:59, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Died? 

message: Just wondering... Does anyone know what religion he might be? By the way, I really have no idea why I even care.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.216.238.163 (talk) 00:37, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion? 

message: I'm just wondering why does Mr. Bagdasarian put Jr. at the end of his name because technically and legally speaking he isn't a Jr., his father's name was Rostom Sipan Bagdasarian and his name is Ross Dickran Bagdasarian a different first and middle name. I'd like to hear some input about possible changing this simply to Ross Bagdasarian while keeping his father's article as is. Thank you. YborCityJohn (talk) 16:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically and legally, John Wayne and Marilyn Monroe were Marion Robert Morrison and Norma Jeane Mortenson. Whatever name he uses professionally, how he is credited and how reliable sources refer to him is what the articles should use. - SummerPhDv2.0 22:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name Discrepancy  
Talk:North Beach, San Francisco

message: The American Planning Association (APA) announced today [Oct. 2nd, 2007] that the North Beach Neighborhood in San Francisco has been designated as one of 10 Great Neighborhoods for 2007 through APA's Great Places in America program. APA Great Places exemplify exceptional character and highlight the role planners and planning play in creating communities of lasting value.
News release; article.
I've included a snippet, but the article is a good one to think about in terms of a pattern for re-writing this article. This got at least some international press; I got the notice in The Economist's monthly San Francisco briefing (not sure if everyone can access this).
MrRedwood 01:36, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: American Planning Association (APA) designation

message: Hey! Nice photo! And it features Panta Rei, one of my favorite North Beach restaurants!
Thanks for adding that to the article!
Atlant 13:38, 3 Mar 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Panta Rei

message: The history section of this article desperately needs expansion. The quote in the lead section mentions the neighborhood's storied history; but all we have now is the neighborhood's origins when the land was filled and a paragraph about its sex-related nightspots and clubs. --Sfmammamia (talk) 16:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  storied history? 

message: IMO, it would be nice to have a separate section for Entertainment, to give the article a little more structure and color. It also might be nice to have a History of Entertainment subtopic since the neighborhood had such a vivid culture in the 1950s when Phyllis Diller, Woody Allen, and other legendary comedians worked there at the Hungry I, when it was a comedy club. And there was also a substantial Jazz Scene in the 1950s when North Beach had over 15 jazz clubs.James Carroll (talk) 19:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Want a New Entertainment Section?

message: Please contribute to Talk:Jack_Kerouac_Alley#North_Beach? re: whether or not Jack Kerouac Alley is in Chinatown or North Beach. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:56, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jack Kerouac Alley
Talk:Arete (excellence)

message: The citation:
1. Paideia, Vol. I, pg. 15. 
has not yet been placed in the article. To do so use the following construction:
Paideia, Vol. I, pg. 15. at the appropriate place in the text. 
Uriel8 11:09, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Raymond Cho (politician)

message: article seems to follow a biographical format in parts and thus needs to conform to including information that is contained other articles. For example, when was Mr. Cho born? where was he born? etc 64.229.181.8 01:27, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  date of birth 

message: Hello,
I think this article needs a Korean infobox, along with the Korean Name being in the introduction (as similar to Byun Baek-hyun as possible) while keeping all the political stuff on the infobox of course.
I'm also thinking if I should list this article in the Wikiproject Korea space...
Thanks in advanced!
Tibbydibby (talk) 03:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of items needed to add to this article: 

message: I think it should be its own category or removed as it is only a table with one item. Legend of 14 (talk) 03:03, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cabinet Positions should not be a part of election results
Talk:Battle of Philiphaugh

message: Was Leslie not a Covenanter and not a Parliamentarian? I haven't changed it because I' not totally sure, but didn't he actually command the Scottish armies against the Parliament of England in 1648-51? Jdorney
:David Leslie took part in the campaigns of 1650 and 1651.  He took no part in that of 1648 because, as a supporter of Argyll, he disapproved of Hamilton and the Engagement.
Rcpaterson 00:35, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Leslie's loyalty
Talk:C--

message: Every language that supports "recursion" also supports "tail recursion" by default.
You are mixing up "tail recursion optimization" (which replaces a recursive call by a simple jump instruction) with "recursion/tail recursion".
84.56.241.219 (talk) 19:37, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong, C does support "tail recursion" 

message: Nombas Scriptease 3.0 (and CEnvi 2.x) also describe themselves as CMM (or c--). It dates from the late 1990's.
It's a kind of C for shell scripting, it is essentially a C intepreter minus Type Declarations and variable names.  Type is declared when the variable is declared, being Float, Long and Byte.  The program was available for OS/2, DOS, Win16, Win32, and Linux.  
--Wendy.krieger (talk) 09:55, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nombas ScriptEase 

message: I have read the language specification [], and it appears, C-- has not much in common with C. It merely looks like it. (E.g. "A procedure may return any number of values.") Somebody should read the specification and write something about the differences. --217.6.251.18 (talk) 06:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  To be extended 

message: If this was real, it may be merely a historical artifact now.  Robertwharvey (talk) 00:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Website link is dead 

message: There doesn't appear to be a canonical one, though, so I don't want to just cut and paste one.  If no one gets to it, I'll try to hammer one out. - Richfife (talk) 16:01, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs at least a "hello, world"