Talk:Paul McCartney discography

message: The Singles charts listed here SHOULD have Paul McCartney's chart performance on major US charts like U.S. Adult Contemporary (AC) and U.S. Adult Alternative Songs (AAA), where he consistently appears to this day. To continue to put dashes for his singles in the U.S. Top 40 charts, where NO legacy artist has a chance in "bloody hell" of appearing, is accurate. However, it does not represent a complete picture of chart performance in the U.S. where music formats are very silo'd and fragmented. Other major artists have these "alternatove format" charts on their Wikipedia page. Whoever has decided that they are the "king" of the Paul McCartney discography page and continues to delete these charts is off-base, to put it mildly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seymore love (talk • contribs) 12:14, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This list says it has his discography with Wings, and it doesn't.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.215.35.237 (talk) 21:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wings?

message: There are so many chart positions on here that are not correct.  For example, on "Mull of Kintyre" it was listed that it went to #3 in the US, when it really went to #33.  The singles and the albums for the most part are all wrong.
:Please remember to sign your contributions --Paploo 23:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chart positions

message: Is there a format to putting in information for non-album tracks?  There is much information that I could give, but don't know to whom I should give it.  --Paploo 23:32, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-album tracks 

message: I don't like the structure of this. I'd rather it be strictly chronological and look more like The Beatles discography or The KLF discography. See also the question from Paploo above. --kingboyk 18:37, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Messy

message: :Image:FiremanRushesCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:FiremanRushesCover.jpg

message: The use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. -Mask? 23:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use images 

message: Why are his albums with Wings here but not his albums with the Beatles? It is inconsistent.
Especially those albums credited only to 'Wings' (and perhaps also those credited to 'Paul McCartney and Wings'?) should not be here. Helpsloose 22:29, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not inconsistent.  Wings was Paul McCartney; the Beatles was a collaborative band.  Virtually all major reference works list McCartney's work with Wings together with his officially solo work.  None of them put the Beatles with it.  We should follow suit. john k (talk) 15:22, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wings? Beatles? 

message: There are missing items under his work as producer, composer and session musician.
Off the top of my head, his work with Apple artists includes work with Jackie Lomax and Mary Hopkin, which is not mentioned.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.43.165.196 (talk) 15:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaborations 

message: Anyone know the rest of these names? --Discographer (talk) 18:36, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Music video directors

message: Unnecessary Presently, there are redundant articles at List of Paul McCartney maxi-singles and List of Paul McCartney musical contributions and appearances. There is neither a precedent nor a necessity for splitting up his discography into these more particular lists (especially one reserved solely for maxi-singles!), so any content that is not present in this article from those two should be merged. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:49, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey I´m working in Paul McCartneys´singles discography page, like other artist like Michael Jackson oneMike-hilal (talk) 02:32, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: I've re-joined this discography from two pieces. McCartney's discography covering Wings and solo work does not need to be split by albums, singles, maxi-singles, etc. One discography is far more useful for readers and the page is not excessively long. Any such change is a major change and should be discussed here, and consensus reached, before it is implemented. — John Cardinal (talk) 04:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: I noticed that in the table with the chart positions for his albums the U.S. chart positions are listed first. Considering Paul McCartney is an English musician, I'd suggest putting the UK chart positions first.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.212.52.100 (talk) 12:21, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chart positions Paul McCartney albums 

message: I can only verify "Mull of Kintyre" as a UK number one for Paul, and at least one source says he only had one #1 in the UK solo, but these other two songs claim to have been #1 in the UK on their respective Wiki pages and in Pauls WP Discography.  GabeMc (talk) 01:00, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Looking for a good Citation for "Pipes of Peace" and "Ebony and Ivory" as UK #1s 

message: The Wings material should be included here.  I've tried a couple of times to revert, but it doesn't seem to be taking.  But it's just totally ridiculous not to include it.  Wings was basically a McCartney solo work, and reference works tend to group them together.  That somebody created a Wings discography page is really neither here nor there.  I'm not sure whether that should exist, but the Wings stuff should absolutely be listed here. john k (talk) 15:33, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wings has its own discography page, and there is a link to it in the article. That is enough. Democraticmacguitarist (talk) 01:38, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that is not enough.  As I said before, Wings' discography is almost always included in lists of McCartney's, and it is generally agreed that Wings was basically a McCartney solo project in all but name.  Not including Wings albums and singles in this list gives a false impression of McCartney's solo career, and as such is actively misleading to readers.  There is absolutely no harm in including it, and excluding it can be misleading.  If duplication is the only reason to exclude it, the better resolution would be to redirect the Wings article here, not to exclude the Wings material from this article. john k (talk) 03:01, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll leave for you to figure that out. Have fun. Democraticmacguitarist (talk) 10:52, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wings 

message: I have always accepted the prevailing thought that in the United States, the live version of "Coming Up" was number one on the Billboard Hot 100 chart. While there are reliable sources that support this, an examination of the actual chart indicates otherwise. When the record debuted on the Hot 100 the week ending April 26, 1980, it was listed as "COMING UP – Paul McCartney" which was the solo, studio version on the A-side. It continued to be listed that way up through July 12, when the record was in the number one position for its third and final week (view chart). The following week, July 19, the record appeared on the Hot 100 as "COMING UP (Live At Glasgow) – Paul McCartney & Wings" but it had now dropped to the number two position (view chart). The live version continued to be listed for the next eight weeks as it descended the chart. Generally speaking, I think it is reasonable to say the live version was more popular in the U.S., but to state that it was number one on the Billboard Hot 100 seems inaccurate, if not blatantly false. Piriczki (talk) 19:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coming Up 

message: what happen with this video?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.210.155.223 (talk) 18:47, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  in the world tonight? 

message: what happen with this single  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.243.201.110 (talk) 10:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  save the child (single)? liverpool oratoria 

message: Could someone please fix the 2010s albums table so there is a "—" in the certifications column?  Thanks!  GoingBatty (talk) 13:46, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fix to 2010s album table 

message: somewhen on 1990 or 89 there was e Single "Party Party".  which had no B-Side (there was an engravement fitting zu "flowers in the dirt" instead. Song was written by Paul Linda and 3 or 4 others  (I think McCollugh was one of the nemes mentioned). I owned that single several years till I sold it to a collecor . At the time i bought it in a Music-store, i remeber also same single as a 3 CD-Single. Song sounds very muche like this  but in that studio-version which lastet arround 5 minutes or so, it was plaed faster and slightly different. Does anyone know more bout that single? --Münzberg (talk) 22:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Party Party 

message: I know that Wings is basically McCartney in all but name but that band has it's own discography page so I can't see a reason to include it here as well, especially as it is linked at the top of the page alongside the Beatles as see also. Lukejordan02 (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Then should there be separate discographies for Paul McCartney, Paul & Linda McCartney, Wings, and Paul McCartney & Wings? It is important to remember that the members of Wings were employees of McCartney and that all of these records were made under McCartney's recording contract with EMI, and later Columbia. McCartney could have put whatever name he chose to on these records. For instance, he considered putting out Band on the Run under just "Paul McCartney" as evidenced by the name on the spine of the jacket but changed it to "Paul McCartney & Wings." Similarly, he has expressed regret that he didn't release Electric Arguments under his own name instead of the Fireman. The point is that these are all McCartney records whatever name he chooses to put on them. The creation of the Wings discography was an ill-conceived idea to begin with and it should have been changed to a re-direct long ago. Duplicating, moving or re-arranging content without adding anything of substance is not particularly helpful and does little to improve the articles in question. Piriczki (talk) 17:37, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Why not start a consensus about deleting the wings discography article and having them grouped like that on Paul McCartney's discography page (have them grouped in a separate section from the other studio albums under the title (albums released as Wings.) Lukejordan02 (talk) 18:22, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: My point is that such distinctions are immaterial and grouping them that way, whether in separate articles or separate sections within an article, is pointless and unnecessary. Again, re-arranging existing content to suit your personal preferences is not constructive editing. Piriczki (talk) 21:35, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wings discography 

message: I've just noticed that an article previously rated a B, Paul McCartney's musical career, has now become a redirect to this discography with all its text deleted (obviously). I'm kinda shocked that this was never discussed on the article's talk page – the rationale given for the change was WP:CFORK. I can well imagine there was some overlap between Paul McCartney#Musical career and the former music career article, but (to my mind anyway) an article dedicated to McCartney's career is a valid inclusion here, and WP:CFORK would only be applicable if such an article were underdeveloped and offered little that wasn't already covered in McCartney's biographical article.
I've long considered writing an article titled George Harrison's musical career. When working on his song and album articles, I find much of the background details are so general that it would be useful to have a separate article on Harrison's musical career, because there's simply not the space to include a general discussion at George Harrison. So I'm wondering: a) are others okay with "Paul McCartney's musical career" having been binned (i.e. did you know/notice?!); and b) is the idea of having a dedicated article on an artist's musical career innately WP:CFORK, or is it just when the content happens to mirror what can be found in the artist's bio article? JG66 (talk) 12:53, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paul McCartney's musical career? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 18 external links on Paul McCartney discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101228034713/http://infodisc.fr/Album_M.php to http://infodisc.fr/Album_M.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130507070538/http://www.infodisc.fr/Album_W.php to http://infodisc.fr/Album_W.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090924015932/http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100621054859/http://www.infodisc.fr/Certif_Album.php to http://www.infodisc.fr/Certif_Album.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100621054859/http://www.infodisc.fr/Certif_Album.php to http://www.infodisc.fr/Certif_Album.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090924015932/http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110616145338/http://www.ifpi.se/wp/wp-content/uploads/guld-platina-1987-1998.pdf to http://www.ifpi.se/wp/wp-content/uploads/guld-platina-1987-1998.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110511092844/http://www.ifpi.at/?section=goldplatin to http://www.ifpi.at/?section=goldplatin
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121105012246/http://www.ifpi.no/sok/lst_trofeer_sok.asp?type=artist to http://www.ifpi.no/sok/lst_trofeer_sok.asp?type=artist
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090124001149/http://2m-online.ru/gold_n_platinum/detail.php?COUNTRY=5075 to http://2m-online.ru/gold_n_platinum/detail.php?COUNTRY=5075
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090124001155/http://2m-online.ru/gold_n_platinum/detail.php?COUNTRY=5077 to http://2m-online.ru/gold_n_platinum/detail.php?COUNTRY=5077
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5kjdcdHb5?url=http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/certification-award-levels.pdf to http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/certification-award-levels.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090924015932/http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090924015932/http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/65yd5AgqG?url=http://www.infodisc.fr/S_Certif.php to http://www.infodisc.fr/S_Certif.php
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090924015932/http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150504180009/http://ariacharts.com.au/chart/singles/78254 to http://www.ariacharts.com.au/chart/singles/78254
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101019182711/http://cria.ca/gold/0203_g.php to http://www.cria.ca/gold/0203_g.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Because Wings discography exists, Wings releases should not be on here. This page should be exclusive to his solo discography solely. I plan on removing all Wings material unless anyone has any objections. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:45, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I object wholeheartedly. The earlier post made by Piriczki was perfect in explaining why the Wings discography should remain here. McCartney75 (talk) 20:13, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

text: I agree that since there is a Wings discography page, the information shouldn't appear here. Or, at least, the current approach doesn't make sense – we should either delete Wings discography, or remove all Wings content from this page and retain the separate band discography. JG66 (talk) 10:15, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you. It doesn't make sense for both to be here. Whether Wings was solely McCartney or just a backing band is irrelevant, the fact that Wings discography exists means it shouldn't be here. If that page were to be redirected then both can be here but it exists, so this page should be just his solo discography. – zmbro (talk) 23:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing Wings 

message: I have examined this otherwise thorough discography and have found no reference to either McCartney's short film score for the 1992 DAUMIER'S LAW or the 1999 "Clean Machine" instrumental (initially released on the Linda McCartney Racing Team website).  Are these eligible for listing here? Mark R.Y.2016
:Regarding the instrumental, if you can provide a source then it can go up, if it was officially released. As for the score, if it wasn't released as a soundtrack album/EP, and the music was only featured in the film, then it wouldn't go in any discography table, but maybe there could be a mention made for it. YouCanDoBetter (talk) 00:56, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Daumier's Law; "Clean Machine" 

message: I remember hearing a version of the old Mickey and Sylvia/Peaches and Herb/Buddy Holly song "Love Is Strange" on a Washington, DC, area radio station in the early 1970s. And this song and a presumed B-side, "I Am Your Singer", are both on the box set of 7-inch singles released in the past couple of years. Why isn't this single shown in the singles discography here? Should someone add it? It would be a non-LP single, I suppose.
I've never mastered the technique of signing my stuff on Talk pages. I am RSLitman, and I am posting this at approximately 9:45 pm Eastern Daylight Savings Time on April 27, 2024 (not 02:45 UTC on 30 April 2024).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by RSLitman (talk • contribs) 01:45, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Love Is Strange" single?