lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:God arguments

message: I like it, but I'm afraid I should probably have discussed this somewhere first, so I won't include it in more pages. At least it looks nice... :) I might of course have missed some important argument and the order is almost completely arbitrary, but other than that, I'm very happy with it. --Merzul 23:33, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: A few of these aren't arguments about whether God exists, but about whether we should believe that it does. Suggesting change to something like "Arguments for and against belief in God", which seems to cover all of them. Ilkali 13:14, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Arguments for and against the existence of God" 

message: These two items:<BR>
 Teleological . . . <SMALL>( the present one )</SMALL>
<BR>&<BR>
 Teleological (design) . . . <SMALL>( the proposed one, with ) </SMALL> the aim to compare: Argument from poor design & Argument from design
 Teleological (Argument from design) 
Instead of the former one, I propose, here, the next one:
* Argument from design is a redirection to: Teleological argument 
I maybe could do this correction by myself but I prefer was done by an admin. And so they're people who knows procedures like the one at the discusion pages to improve articles. 
Maybe I do it here, too complicated, but it's only this: what I propose:
 · Teleological · . . . . .  . <SMALL>( the present one )</SMALL>
 &
 · Teleological (design) . . . <SMALL>( the proposed one )</SMALL>
And to end, I sign: CIAO! --PLA y Grande Covián (talk) 03:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about this change at the proposed teleological item? 

message: I have removed near death experiences from the list as the article it leads to says virtually nothing about NDEs being used as an argument for belief in God and I am unaware of any major thinkers or figures who have used it as an argument in its own right to suggest this. I have no problem with it being reinstated, but before it is, could someone find some examples of it being used as an argument for God's existence. (This is not the first time I've removed links from this template when they lead to articles which make no mention of arguments for/against God's existence).122.106.160.244 (talk) 10:35, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Near Death Experiences

message: Anybody want to merge this in? tahc chat 20:10, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anybody want to merge this in?
Talk:Little spotted kiwi

message: I have added high resolution photos to Wikimedia Commons of little spotted kiwi, it's egg, and vestigial wing. I'm new to editing Wiki so I'll leave it to some other clever person to use on this page. 
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Apteryx_owenii
Psychokiwi (talk) 04:54, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the nice photos, I've added some, and more can be added if the article gets longer. Feel free to edit the captions. FunkMonk (talk) 08:20, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Photographs available

message: See Save the Kiwi at Little Spotted for info on why south island origination. Teak the Kiwi 23:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Yea about the page, it needs more describing on the actual kiwi. It's just about conservation and habitat, nothing describing about it. So could someone please do something about it?
219.89.6.165 (talk) 21:34, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little Spotted Kiwi 
Talk:Unsinkable aircraft carrier

message: I recall a magazine cover (either Time or Newsweek) with an aircraft carrier in the shape of Taiwan and (IIRC) Jiang Zemin across the coast. Anyone willing to sniff it out? -- 我♥中國 23:37, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Magazine cover

message: TV series about WWII Secret Weapons described work (British?) on an Aircraft Carrier made of water ice composit that would resist melting and torpedoes and bombs (but probably not burning aviation fuel.) Also note the (1982?) movie "Firefox" where an improptu landing strip is made from Arctic pack ice. Shjacks45 (talk) 21:50, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Secret weapons of WWII" 

message: The reference to a Time story in 1950 actually shows MacArthur saying that if the PRC captured Taiwan then its then short-range fighter planes could reach the Philippines. He did not in fact say that Taiwan is an "unsinkable aircraft carrier" for the US. --JWB (talk) 08:18, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  MacArthur 

message: In the article there is reference to George Orwell's book Nineteen Eighty four. Firstly the book title is not 1984 (numbers) but Nineteen Eighty Four (words). secondly it makes reference to the UK being called 'Airstrip One' by the 'Party', and it says that this is because during the cold war the US considered the UK a 'unsinkable aircraft carrier', however the book was written in 1948, and the US wasn't concerned with Soviet expansion into Europe until 1949 with the events of the 'Berlin blockade' and the 'Berlin airlift'. Before this point (and possibly still after this Point) the US was just concerned with 'containing the spread of communism' not with the USSR's expanding control over eastern Europe. this means that Orwell probably wouldn't use the idea of the 'unsinkable aircraft carriers' thus removing them as the reasoning for the renaming of the UK to 'Airstrip One' It is possible however that Orwell may have done this, but having looked into the unsinkable aircraft carriers, they were generally small atolls, just large enough for a runway, not landmasses the size of the UK, they also only tended to have 1 runway per island (not unlike actual aircraft carriers). Orwell was not a stupid man, not by a stretch, and for this reason, I doubt that he would uses such a stressed basis for naming. If the author can give proof that this is the reason behind naming, feel free to amend my change i.e. (removal of the offending piece of text).JJIHARKER (talk) 23:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nineteen Eighty Four
Talk:Mahoning Valley

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the proposal was merge. Jgera5 (talk) 14:36, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: There doesn't appear to be any objections. Merge it is. Jgera5 (talk) 14:36, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Category talk:Arkansas

message: Is it really a new policy for no articles to be good enuff to put under a state name? I was going to re-add Crater of Diamonds. It would look rather silly all by itself, but it does go into the Article section. I think the only other things (diamonds) that come close(for North America) are up in Canada somewhere(And far larger deposits, I think). -Mmcannis 02:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Starting talk: ?-No articles?
Talk:High-speed transport

message: according to the text, 1-36 were obtained converting 1+17+14=32 ships -- but below 23+9 is correct
according to the APD list, 34=36-2 ships were actually converted  --- no, 33=36-2 (canceled) -1 (APD-30 is missing)
by the way, Silvestone 1968 (US warships ...) is confuse on the losses, that are 8 on page 276 and 10 on page 404 is pietro  
151.29.249.152 (talk) 17:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  flush-deck 

message: The link to high speed transport from the Battle of the Bismarck Sea article refers to use by Imperial Japanese Navy in WWII. The article as of 2 Mar 2018 is about United States Navy conversions of destroyers and destroyer escorts to high-speed transport type. It could be the IJN used unconverted destroyers as high speed transports while USN used conversions, but that point is not clear. This article could use some expansion on the high speed transport ships used by other navies by editors familiar with the subject and with access to reliable sources. --Naaman Brown (talk) 14:58, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  high speed transports
Talk:Nokia 6681/6682

message: This should be merged with the 6680 article. There isn't enough content for an entire article dedicated to the 6681/2.
Yes, it must be merged into the 6680. There is only one small difference - the lack of support for 3G networks. Javy tahu (talk) 22:40, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Charles Pasley

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Natsubee 16:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have undone that change since the initial "British Empire" isn't part of the title of the essay as near as I can tell.  Cjrother 03:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 
Talk:Elizabeth Borton de Treviño

message: Is this woman possibly still with us? I've been searching for more info but really can't find any. If anyone knows if she is alive, the information would be most appreciated.
Longevitymonger
23:50, 2 January 2007
: She died December 2, 2001 at 97.  Haddison (talk) 23:10, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Six years later. For some reason many authorities lack her death date but US Library of Congress lists 1904-2001. Some Borton/deTrevino/Trevino confusion may be in play. --P64 (talk) 23:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: (death)

message: These are the lead words of several paragraphs
#Mary Elizabeth Victoria Borton de Treviño ... (lead par)
#Elizabeth was born ...
#In later life, Elizabeth Borton wrote several memoirs of her life ...
#Elizabeth Borton de Treviño died ...
#Mrs Treviño also wrote a novel ... (final par)
2. Not simply "Elizabeth" altho that is fine later in the paragraph. If 'Mary Elizabeth Victoria Borton' is the birth name, we may use that or "Elizabeth Borton" here.
3. Did she publish anything as Elizabeth Borton? After her husband's death? 
5. Never "Mrs Trevino". Simply "Trevino" is ok, if we are right to make her "Trevino, Elizabeth Borton de". In that case we should not suddenly use simply "Trevino" in the final paragraph.
Rewrite the final paragraph without "Mrs Trevino" or the lone first names. --P64 (talk) 23:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Gas-guzzler

message: Suggest revision of:
This is however very questionable action, seeing that it's illegal, and generally, burning for instance a Hummer H2 generates a lot more of smog-forming pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides than running the vehicle for a considerable amount of time.
Run-on with excessive commas. Also, not sure "such as nitrogen oxides than running the vehicle for a considerable amount of time" is a complete thought.
Proposal:
This is however a very questionable action, seeing that it's illegal. It also produces the opposite of the desired effect. For instance, burning a Hummer H2 would generate a lot more of smog-forming pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides, than running the vehicle for a considerable amount of time.
| Exsellion89 18:43, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''A look at'' Vandalism upon gas-guzzlers 

message: A car made out of Italian bread. . . now that would be super.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.19.15.94 (talk) 18:46, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Italian bread supercars" 

message: I removed an unsourced bullet point claiming that too small a displacement causes excessive fuel consumption.  Even if true -- which is highly doubtful (ICEs generally operate more efficiently at higher load) -- it is completely implausible that such a vehicle would be characterized as a gas-guzzler as a result.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.246.96.95 (talk) 03:08, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The current trend for small capacity highly turbocharged engines is specifically aimed at getting the vehicle into a lower emissions bracket.  In the world outside the testing lab, however, you have to thrash the nuts off them to make any kind of decent progress, at which point the fuel gauge starts doing a realistic impression of a homesick rock.  But that's the customer's problem, not the manufacturer's.  In comparison with a suburban main battle tank such vehicles aren't gas-guzzlers per se, of course. Mr Larrington (talk) 20:00, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I drive 2.4 tonne 4x4 biturbo 2.0l diesel and it gets 24 mpg, which oddly enough is what my 767 kg Escort Mk  I used to get back in 1978. I don't find your claim convincing. Greglocock (talk) 21:20, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yebbut 1: it's a diesel and b) 2.0L isn’t what I'd call small.  1.0-1.3 turbocharged petrol engines are a different matter - small Fiats in particular have been on the receiving end of criticism in the UK. Mr Larrington (talk) 20:47, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Small engine causing excessive fuel consumption 

message: How about stone-age era engines with low compression ratios and outdated cr*p like carburetors or mechanical distributor ignition? 46.115.118.127 (talk) 08:24, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons for bad fuel economy
Category talk:Semi-protected

message: I am a legitimite registred user but I can't edit those pages.--Dummmmmmy 00:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You need to be registered for 4 days before you can. Anyway pages that are semi-protected (IMAO) are not where newbies should be starting their editing. --Benchat 05:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not able to edit
Talk:Gospel of Matthias

message: Clement of Alexandria does not say that it's the Nicolaiatans who ascribe this saying to Matthaias. Here is Clement's passage from Stromata III.4:
* We also mentioned the blasphemous immorality of Carpocrates. But when we spoke about the saying of Nicolaus we omitted to say this. Nicolaus, they say, had a lovely wife. When after the Saviour's ascension he was accused before the apostles of jealousy, he brought his wife into the concourse and allowed anyone who so desired to marry her. For, they say, this action was appropriate to the saying: "One must abuse the flesh." Those who share his heresy follow both his action and his words simply and without qualification by indulging in the gravest enormity. 
*  
* 26. I am informed, however, that Nicolaus never had relations with any woman other than the wife he married, and that of his children his daughters remained virgins to their old age, and his son remained uncorrupted. In view of this it was an act of suppression of passion when he brought before the apostles the wife on whose account he was jealous. He taught what it meant to "abuse the flesh" by restraining the distracting passions. For, as the Lord commanded, he did not wish to serve two masters, pleasure and God. It is said that Matthias also taught that one should fight the flesh and abuse it, never allowing it to give way to licentious pleasure, so that the soul might grow by faith and knowledge. 
Rakovsky (talk) 15:36, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicolaiatans and the Gospel of Matthias
Talk:Uchechi Kalu

message: I believe this article conflates two different people named Uchechi Kalu, who happen to both be writer/coaches. The Uchechi Kalu pictured currently owns the website uchechi.com and is not, if you compare photos from Princeton and Medium in the sources, the Uchechi described in the bio section. The Uchechi described in the bio almost certainly did not study under June Jordan, since June died in 2002 when that Uchechi would have been about 10. While the Uchechi in the photo is Nigerian-born, I'm not seeing any evidence that the Uchechi in the bio was Nigerian-born (though maybe, since its an Igbo name). My guess is that the introduction and bio were written separately without the second contributor realizing they were different people. Mr. G. Williams (talk) 12:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Combining different people?
Talk:Home Insurance Building

message: Under the photo, it says "Floor count 10 (later 12)".  At the bottom of the page it is listed in the "Selected towers with 20 or more floors" section/ --TrogWoolley (talk) 16:49, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Am I missing something? 

message: The article can't seem to make up its mind about this - in the table under the picture, it says the building was the tallest in the world for five years, but in the body of the article it says it was never the tallest building in the world or even in Chicago. Merkava120 (talk) 22:28, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was it tallest or not? 
Talk:Orchestra at Temple Square

message: It would be nice to have a picture to go along with this article, as well as a heading and subheadings.  Does anyone have a picture? Sylverdin 23:59, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: – Thanks! -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 16:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Layout

message: This article should be merged with The Orchestra at Temple Square.  I don't see any reason to keep them separated.  They are both about the same exact organization.  Can we go ahead with it? Leon7 08:32, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: – Thanks! -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 16:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with [[The Orchestra at Temple Square]] 

message: I have now put one up as well as a basic info section. MoTabChoir01 (talk) 16:20, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks great;  more pictures would be appreciated. -- Charles Edwin Shipp (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture for page
Talk:1948 Arab–Israeli War/Archive 5

message: I hope the protection period proved productive. I am prepared to unprotect now. Any objections? El_C 02:36, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been brought to my attention that the dispute has been brought before the Committee and was requested to leave the page protected for the duration of the case. I am inclined to accept this and prolonge the protection accordingly (within reason, though). Thanks everyone. El_C 01:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Unprotection
Template talk:Nucleic acid inhibitors

message: Some antivirals are sulfonamides, should we add them here? JKW 00:03, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I'd say that this template is more for sulfonamide antibacterials as per the ATC classification, not just the chemical structure, but that's just my opinion :) Fvasconcellos (t·c) 17:36, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding some antivirals
Talk:The Victor (comics)

message: Figaro - an overweight, bumbling Mexican bandit - doesn't fit an adventure comic like Victor - he's a Topper character. Was he really also in Victor, or should it be removed from the list. Digifiend (talk) 13:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Figaro 

message: I love edward cullen  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.198.11.85 (talk) 16:00, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edward Cullen
Talk:1993 in music

message: Jeff Beck's album "Crazy Legs" is listed twice on the chart, at June 19 and also at June 29.  The latter is the correct date.  Mylifeinthe90s (talk) 01:58, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

message: *This list was deleted because there is no criteria on how these are "top hits"...or what that even means, actually; in fact, a few of those songs weren't hits at all (check billboard.com). More importantly, it's unsourced trivia, and anything unsourced can be removed. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 02:53, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top hits
Talk:Conrad Grebel

message: There has been disagreement among editors about the cause of Grebel's death. The latest update cited a personal interview as a source, which doesn't pass the verifiability test. I am going to remove the cause of death phrase until a verifiable, published source can be found. I don't think it will be difficult to come up with a such a source. ✤ JonHarder talk 00:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cause of death
Talk:Yi Yin

message: http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%BC%8A%E5%B0%B9 has a much longer text, but I don't read a bit of it. Would it help you in your quest for maintaining an article about this individual if someone could translate for you? See Wikipedia:Translation for possible help, or :Category:Translators zh-en... -- nae'blis 00:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Nationality doesn't really apply here.  The Shang, etc, didn't really have a concept of citizenship.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:47:4601:540:F4D8:2AB3:A198:6FFC (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality
Talk:Gamecock

message: The sentance makes no sense, a high protein diet would not consist of vegetables....  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.192.100.188 (talk) 10:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  high protein diet - vegetables 

message: The selected stag or cock shall be subjected to the rules or processes of the keep.  The fowl is dewormed, deloused or given a insectiside dip or bath.  The fowl is fed with high protein and medicated ration.  The typical ration includes assorted and mixed grains blended with high protein rationed engineered to burn fat and prepare the fowl physically for the fight.  Some include fruits and vegetables.  The selected stag or cock will undergo exercises to enhance the fighting strategy.  The real test is in the cockfighting event in the cockpit.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.204.240.25 (talk) 13:03, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Gamefowl Keep

message: this article is very factual and not even close to apologizing.facts are not apologistic.Kdmeany sounds more like an animal rights activist or supporter that believes lies spread by animal rights activists in order to eradicate gamecocks.Refer to historical documented references and actual breeders ,,,not agenda driven activists.
 
The article reads like a cockfighting apologist and should be rewritten in neutral point of view. That being said, most of the useful and unique information in the article could be easily merged into the cockfighting article under its own heading.  Kdmeaney (talk) 00:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 16:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality and article existing at all
Talk:Wayne Besen

message: I am concerned that we not regard Mr. Besen's page as only a biography.  Besen's photgraph and story on Mr. John Paulk caused the resignation of a national figure (Mr. Paulk).  Therefore, I added this text: "Besen's photograph of Paulk (and subsequent release of the story) was instrumental in the ultimate removal of Paulk from being Chair at Exodus International, a major organization in the "Ex-gay movement". As noted by the Washington Post, a USA mainstream newspaper, "John Paulk had been the most famous success story of the Christian ex- gay movement, which seeks to persuade gay men and lesbians to accept Jesus and renounce homosexuality. He had appeared on "60 Minutes," "Oprah" and the cover of Newsweek." " Caryn LeMur (talk) 21:28, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Justification for notability
Talk:Civilian (street artist)

message: Give me a while and I’ll bring this article up to scratch. Dfrg.msc  1 . 2 . Editor Review 00:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In progress

message: Shouldn't "Empty Shows" be in lowercase, i.e. "empty shows" and also 
using apostrophes, i.e. 'empty shows' ? 
Alternatively we can italicise it as such: empty shows
Rfwoolf 06:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's "Empty Shows" because it's the name of a place. Dfrg.msc 06:10, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Empty Shows"
Talk:Dlux

message: Give me a while and I’ll bring this article up to scratch. Dfrg.msc  1 . 2 . Editor Review 00:19, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In progress
Talk:Meek (street artist)

message: Give me a while and I’ll bring this article up to scratch. Dfrg.msc  1 . 2 . Editor Review 00:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In progress
Talk:Phibs

message: Give me a while and I’ll bring this article up to scratch. Dfrg.msc  1 . 2 . Editor Review 00:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Great, I'll use that. Cheers, Dfrg.msc 06:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In progress
Talk:Rone

message: Give me a while and I’ll bring this article up to scratch. Dfrg.msc  1 . 2 . Editor Review 00:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In progress