Talk:WWE Backlash

message: The card hasn't been confirmed yet. Please don't add your own fantasy card.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.180.120.158 (talk) 17:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: backlash 2008

message: I deleted this match from Backlash 2006 because it has not been confirmed yet. 152.228.242.165 04:41, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rob Van Dam v. Shelton Benjamin 

message: Since a editor keeps saying that it should be noted that Backlash 2002 was the last American PPV under the WWF name (the last PPV under the WWF name was the UK-only PPV Insurrextion 2002, which took place 1 day before they became WWE). I don't find it all that notable, and several other editors have also removed it. Since this user continues to add it back though, I thought I would bring it here to see what the consensus is. TJ Spyke 07:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Personally, I think it is notable, but I sadly can't think of a way to explain why I feel as such. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 14:48, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Sorry I don't understand why it would be notable. --Naha|(talk) 15:52, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't understand either. Davnel03 21:17, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Its notable in the way that its notable when the lat wcw ppv was because its the last one. While the insurecction ppv is technical the last one insurrection is a uk only event.LifeStroke420 (talk) 03:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last American PPV 

message: Can you add the Backlash 2008 promotional poster it's on the wwe site im too busy to do it so...
Meepboy (talk) 21:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add picture 

message: Is Backlash going to get its own article? If not, why? All other PPV's are getting their own articles. -GuffasBorgz7- 11:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: create one, link there. simple, isn't it? Diivoo (talk) 16:01, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I already tried making Backlash (2008) but someone reverted it for some reason. -GuffasBorgz7- 20:07, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Its still to early to make one because there is not enough info for it yet . This has been discussed at the wp:pw talk page. MATT 21:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  who cares? the event is next. Diivoo (talk) 17:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

text: As the weeks go by there will be enough info to make its own article MATT 21:32, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backlash 2008 Article 

message: I understand this article is under expansion and I'm glad to see that. But to inform people that this article still contains jargon I've placed a tag in the article. Match types are not explained among other things. That needs to be fixed.--WillC 23:38, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Why are you obsessed with dumbing down every PPV article? Most of the articles you put the jargon tag on do NOT need it as not every little thing that exists has to be explained (that's why linking exists). Articles are allowed to have some jargon. TJ Spyke 23:50, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, ones that people can understand quickly are allowed. But like a Hell in a Cell match for intense is not. I'm trying to make sure everyone can understand it. I've placed the jargon tags on articles that need it. And yes, every 2009 PPV event has needed it because they aren't following the correct formats.--WillC 00:00, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Jargon

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on WWE Backlash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090428020538/http://www.wwe.com/shows/backlash/history/backlash1999/mainevent/ to http://www.wwe.com/shows/backlash/history/backlash1999/mainevent/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070319234707/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2007/2007_03_14.jsp to http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2007/2007_03_14.jsp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070319234707/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2007/2007_03_14.jsp to http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2007/2007_03_14.jsp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:51, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: *dean Ambrose vs John cena Bongumenzi Mzobe (talk) 04:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  MATCHES 

message: Backlash 1999 was NOT an In Your House PPV. Yes, the poster that was released months earlier does say In Your House on it, but at some point between the poster's release and the actual PPV itself, WWE dropped the In Your House name. If you watch the PPV, and even the episode of Sunday Night Heat that preceded the PPV, not once throughout the whole event is the name "In Your House" mentioned. Not by the commentators or wrestlers and not even an on-screen graphic. Also the cover of the original home video release does not say In Your House either. Every other In Your House from May 1995 until St. Valentine's Day Massacre has the name shown on screen, mentioned on screen and it's included on the cover of the home video release. OldSkool01 (talk) 16:27, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Backlash 1999