Talk:UPN

message: The stations joining My Network TV will begin showing MNTV programming September 5.  However, UPN doesn't shut down until September 17.  How will the stations handle this?  Will they carry UPN programming in a different time block, or just drop the affiliation all together? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.104.224.115 (talk • contribs) 
Actually it was on September 15th, 2006, they were showing ads to the newly network MyNetworkTV. panicpack121  —Preceding comment was added at 01:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stations to Not Carry UPN's Final 13 Days

message: In Chicago, UPN changed the station name several times.From UPN to Power 50 to to My 50.--Always Gotta Keep it Real, Cute 1 4 u 20:16, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title Change

message: My UPN channel show South Park and The Simpsons every weekday. Does this only happen in Maine or something? -Let There Be Rock
In Kansas City and independent station has both Simpons and SP  Tknab 02:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: South Park and The Simpsons

message: " in several large American cities, the local CBS and UPN stations are operated as "duopolies." "
Not sure what the point was, but there are no CBS duopolies in large American cities ... that would require that they be the only or the decisively dominant media outlets.  All large American cities have ABC, NBC, FOX, and many cable outlets.
:Actually, as defined by the FCC, a duopoly is the same entity owning two full-power stations in the same market.SWalkerTTU 03:49, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Not duopolies in large American cities

message: Any objections to adding the "current event" box for the next 2 weeks w/ the closure/Smackdown on Tribune stuff going on? --David Bixenspan 23:19, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Event?

message: Maybe someone whos knows how to do it (I dont), should make a gallery of UPN logos.Yet-another-user 02:14, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I have an idea

message: I recently added a table of the most-watched programs of the network of the 2001-2002 season. I meant to include the TV seasons following 2001-2002, up until the present. However, another Wiki user had deleted it shortly thereafter. My question to anyone here is should tables of the most-watched programs per season since 2001-2002 be included? I believe that such an addition is informative and an interesting read. Let me know what you think. -- Dechnique23 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Add most-watched programs of the network per season since 2001-2002?

message: So, I'm just going to revert the entire article, because the changes made to the article are clearly not true. Some are mixed info with The WB, and it keeps saying a "relaucnhc of UPN". So, Just letting ya'll know. Kdupuy9 04:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This "launch returned" vandalism hasn't stopped -- I just reverted it.  I think this needs to be dealt with ASAP, as this person probably won't be stopping anytime soon.  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:42, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This guy is back again, the article should be semi-protected to prevent a repeat of last time Jorobeq 00:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He's known as the UPN vandal, you can read about him here. Me and David Levy are the main people taking care of him. All socks should be blocked on sight. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:29, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Been reverting any of his latest work. He even spammed me with his thoughts and a logo he appears to have made o_O - What a nutjob. - Boochan 10:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm thinking of reporting him to WP:LTA. This has gone on long enough. And let me also say that his main activity is claiming UPN will return, claiming a Simpsons Movie soundtrack will be released, and impersonating other users, including me, David, and any of his sock puppets.--AAA! (AAAA) 10:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

text: With the recent return to semi-protection, he's now reverting this talk page to the version with his comments (which were originally added under the Bart Simpson 134 and JeezyCity145 accounts, but edits by IPs and new sock  are trying to bring them back) to get his point (that UPN should return this fall) across.  Perhaps we should do something with this very talk page itself?  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 15:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A Clear Vandalism

message: I just created an account to correct a typo, I usually do this anonymously, but this page is semi-protected, and I can't correct it.
The last subtitle within History says "Executive ,anagement", could someone correct it?
AndresX7 16:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Typo

message: :Image:Upn.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Upn.gif

message: :Image:Paramount networklogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Paramount networklogo.jpg

message: User:JARIAN has been blocked and warned about their future conduct for inappropriate edits to this and similar pages. Feel free to bring any future problems with this user to my attention. Thanks, Deiz talk 00:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: JARIAN

message: Should mention the fact that this network single handedly ended the professional wrestling career of Muhammad Hassan with their self righteousness. 
UPN must be held accountable for ending a 23 year old's promising career over nonsensical crap. Everyone knows pro wrestling storyline are not real so why was it such a big deal to kill the poor guys job? 
This should be mentioned 2A02:6B60:31DA:0:A4FA:C0F5:79EA:B447 (talk) 20:47, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Network ended a the young career