lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Greg A. Hill

message: Delete Gregory Hill (BMX) please. Greg A. Hill has superseded it. Sorry, I meant to get back to this issue sooner. Has anyone seen my plea for guidance for uploading photographs from defunct magazines? Hunter2005 07:27, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected. - N (talk) 00:54, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I removed this as completely inappropriate for inclusion in the article itself, but this may be a valuable resource for sourcing actual content in the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:01, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential sources 

message: Here is a nice article about Greg Hill's signature model. Bruxton (talk) 01:23, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Cyclepro
Talk:Charmed baryon

message: 1) I'm not fully convinced that a distinct page for charmed baryons is needed, but I guess it can't hurt.
2) Should the title be "Charmed baryon" instead?
3) It feels like it needs some history. I wasn't around back then and it looks like a chunk of work to put down a timeline (given that a lot of the early observations had a very small number of events and/or were identified as excited uncharmed baryon states at the time). Maybe there's a nice review article somewhere...
4) How much depth is appropriate? Anything more than a superficial fly-over is going to be of interest only to a very, very small audience.
Physicsdog 07:30, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd vote for changing this to a redirect to Baryon, perhaps with an (relatively small) expansion of the paragraph starting "There are additional baryon states which contain heavy quarks." (Oh, and yes, if we kept the article it should be singular rather than plural). I guess my only doubt is about the large number of particles and how best to organize them, but I certainly don't know enough physics to make much of a recommendation about whether "charmed baryon" is a large enough category to be a good organizational tool. Kingdon 23:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:1972 in baseball

message: 1972 baseball strike was just created and belongs here somewhere, I would imagine. gren グレン 07:30, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

message: There is a logical error committed in two places in this article. Twice it claims that since the lost games were not made up it effected who won the AL East Division (Detroit instead of Boston).  Wrong, wrong, wrong, for two reasons. One, even if the extra games had been played, Boston still might have lost, perhaps by even five games, so the elimination of the extra games by itself did not prevent Boston from winning the division. I forget the name of this type of fallacy (I want to say Hasty Conclusion, but I'm sure that's wrong) where one assumes that the same conclusion would have happened even if the earlier event had been different. Secondly, suppose a starting pitcher walked the first batter and then retired the next 27 batters. You can bet your last dollar that somebody will say something like, "If only he had gotten the first batter out - he would have had a perfect game!" No, no, and NO! You can't assume that's the case, because if he had gotten that first batter out, he might have then given up 10 more hits and not gotten out of the first inning. In other words, you can't assume that because an antecedent event hadn't occurred, that everything else that happened after it would have still happened the way it did.
Having said all of that (you still reading this?), I won't delete it or change it. Maybe someone else will. However I may change some other parts, since there are certain statements that violate NPOV. __209.179.14.48 (talk) 21:42, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Logical fallacy in article
Talk:Traditional heavy metal/Archive 1

message: I do disagree with this idea, many these bands listed on this article have little in common with Hair matal, if anything, Hair Metal should redirect to Glam Metal. Avador 19:28, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Merging the articles wouldnt neccesarily result in information being lost, but would allow for a more comphrensive article that would cover both equally, and also would explain the divide and connection between the two better. At the minute, the articles are clones of each other, seperated only by the fashion schemes of some bands. This is not what Wikipedia is about, and from an encycolpedic point of view, is wastefull. Combing the articles is both practical, and informative. Leyasu 13:30, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

text: Either the articles both need seriously heavy rewriting or to be merged. This is an encylcopedia, not a 'seperate bands by how much i like them' webspace. I also solved the Glam Metal/Hair Metal argument with one tiny little edit, so that warrants no more petty arguments. Again, they might be two different genres. But if ones only difference is fashion sense, then they should be merged into a split article. Leyasu 08:31, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

text: This isnt a genre, i have found nothing about it being a genre other than here. What i have come to find, is that this is nothing more than a term to encompass bands with a similar link, the same as Epic Metal and Dark Metal do. Classic Metal, as i have found, pertains to any, and all, Heavy Metal, Thrash Metal and Hair Metal (Glam Metal) bands, due to their place in time, and them being recognised as metal classics. This isnt a genre from what i can see, and ive found nothing to say otherwise, as such this needs to be merged, or greatly rewritten for factual accuracy. Leyasu 11:01, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Discussion 

message: Is someone just going round and trying to fucking merge every Metal genra together? WTF? Someone should stop who evers messing with the articles. Its just not funny.
:It seems like there was a time when everyone wanted to make every 'genre' they had ever dreamed up into an article. Now that they're pretty much all out there, other people are coming along and saying "wtf, that's not a genre."  So now we're merging and deleting articles that don't make sense as an individual article.  Check out the fun at Black Metal if you want to see this in action. marnues 08:13, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF??!
Talk:Synthetic ruby

message: I came here by way of the article Ruby, which I reached from Verneuil process.  At first I started editing to begin the  process.  Then I was struck by how little attempt was made to relate this article to other articles/topics.  *Then* I saw the advertisement at the end (see Talk:Ict, inc.).  *Then* I was dumbfounded by the sentence:
:There are a number of methods utilized to make synthetic ruby. 
Well, gee, that's how I got here, from one of those methods, one of many, that can be used to make Synthetic ruby. Which deserve concrete mention by larger description and links.   Going back to that article demonstrates the rather large gap between where this one is and where it should be.
Shenme 07:35, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup - made it a redirect for now, if someone wants to rewrite that's fine. Vsmith 13:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Advertisement by [[Ict, inc.]] ?
Talk:Chess boxing

message: is an article which claims that chess boxing originated in Kidbrooke, SE London, in the late 1970s. This fact should feature in this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Randomgurn (talk • contribs) 09:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Earlier invention of chess boxing 

message: What happens, if the chess game not just ends in a draw, but does so quickly, when there are still some boxing rounds to fight? Are the remaining boxing rounds fought out or do the boxing points decide immediately? --Alexmagnus (talk) 16:42, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draw 

message: Under the Entry for Major Organizations, it's stated that Iepe Rubuingh is the current chairman of the World Chess Boxing Organisation, but under the subheader "Chessboxing Nation" the article says he's dead and the organization has collapsed. Paradigmalex (talk) 23:48, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't checked, but feel free to fix the error :) Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 00:13, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  World Chess Boxing Organisation 

message: Hey, recently there was a big chess boxing event live-streamed by the YouTube channel Ludwig. I think it probably was big enough it could be put in the pop culture section or something. Ianbambooman (talk) 14:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ludwig chess boxing championship 

message: the section "chess boxing and science" is written in a weird language, without saying anything concrete. The citations given in the section also seem weird. Either the section should be rewritten or removed. Walderonn (talk) 23:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chess Boxing and Science looks like pesudoscience
Talk:Midway Arcade Treasures Deluxe Edition

message: Just a note on the image, it's a bit out of date. Note it says "28 games" when in fact Mortal Kombat was added to the set, making it 29. The rating is no longer "Teen" or "Mature" but a range from E to M (the Mortal Kombat games helped start the whole voluntary video games rating system after all and were considered "mature" under the equivalent to today's Mature).
*New images can be found on Midway.com's site, btw.
===There is no Wii version===
I've checked Midway.com, IGN, GameFaqs, and a few other gaming sites, as well as using some search engines.  I can't find a single mention of a Wii version.  So I've removed the Wii section of the article.  CardinalFangZERO 11:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: I've checked Midway.com, IGN, GameFaqs, and a few other gaming sites, as well as using some search engines.  I can't find a single mention of a Wii version.  So I've removed the Wii section of the article.  CardinalFangZERO 11:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: There is no Wii version
Talk:ITU prefix

message: Why is the ROC (Taiwan) conspicuously absent from the ITU Prefix list? do they share Mainland China's  call-sign prefixes? I've noticed this is with Japan, North Korea, and South Korea, as well.
Raccoon Fox 04:01, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Regarding the absence of Taiwan from the ITU list, most likely it's due to political pressure from the PRC. According to this site, Taiwan has or continues to use the callsigns BM, BN, BO, BQ, BV and BX. -Loren 07:39, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Taiwan can use any callsign starting with B or any other prefix allocated to China. --  Denelson83  21:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Taiwan]] 

message: Should there be a table organized by country? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 1.618033989 (talk • contribs) 09:47, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is one. Refer to List of ITU prefixes by nation and ITU prefix/Grid chart. :)  RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 19:02, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Table 

message: More info: Dissolution of the Netherlands Antilles. Styath (talk) 17:31, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but the ITU hasn't published any new information regarding this. --  Denelson83  21:04, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs update regarding dissolution of the Netherlands Antilles 

message: Does South Sudan have a prefix yet?
They've just recently been allocated .ss as their internet TLD. Roger (talk) 12:33, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Z8 prefix was allocated on 23 Feb 2012 User:fitzsimons  —Preceding undated comment added 12:51, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It was added to the list by this edit on 24 February 2012 - almost a full year ago, do try to keep up... :) Roger (talk) 13:10, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  South Sudan
Talk:Java OpenGL

message: I think it would really help if a list of the above where to be added to the page. It would allow people to make a more informed choice about whether or not they want to use JOGL. Though at the moment in time, it may not be that useful, what with version one effectively unsupported and version two still in beta; this later point could make it hard to keep track of so maybe a link to the jogl site and just list some of the more notable and server problems. Thecoshman (talk) 09:13, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsupported Features and known flaws

message: Hi, the source code listed is somewhat archaic, and not quite correct (will swamp the CPU) - it should be revised ot rather make use of the provided Animator classes, etc.
Dawid (10:38, 21 Feb 2006 SAST)
:In fact, it probably won't compile with the newer versions at all. I've encountered the same problem with the various OpenGL tutorials on the net that provide JOGL samples. -- Ashmodai 03:00, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Thought it was interesting to link JOGL to JSR-231 explicitly (before that was just in the image box), and talk about the upcoming interoperability between Java2D and OpenGL, through JOGL Hervegirod 21:08, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Status and Java / OpenGL interoperability

message: OK I see 3 kinds of JOGL
one from jogl.dev.java.net
one from jogamp.org
one from linux distro repositories...
apparently in the article jogamp.org is seen as authority...
does JSR 231 still exist?
which authority has signed jars that run without needing user permission in most browsers (i.e. trusted jars)?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.49.89.43 (talk) 19:07, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: All JOGL development takes place on jogamp.org now.  JSR231 still exists, but it describes JOGL 1.0 only.  JOGL 2.0 is an independent project, it is not sponsored by Oracle, nor does it participate in the JCP.  It is a continuation of the JOGL 1.0 work, and remains compatible with much of JOGL 1.0, but for all other purposes such as signing, can be regarded as a completely separate project from the now very much defunct JOGL1.0/JSR231.  67.98.226.14 (talk) 18:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  who is the JOGL authority? jogl.dev.java.net or jogamp.org? 

message: User:Gouessej insists on putting back his mediocre code example full of deprecated OpenGL that is longer than the article, together with prominent mention of his name and website. I am removing it again in favour of a short, illustrative example. Sam Hocevar (talk) 11:06, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing self-publicity
Talk:Ernie Stautner

message: :Stautner played his entire career with the Steelers, despite playing on some bad teams, he was able to distinguish himself
That sentence seem odd to anyone else? :) Did he play on some other teams for awhile, or did he stay with the Steelers and THEY were bad?  Were the Steelers good? --Fxer 08:40, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd sentence 
Talk:Dave Chappelle's Block Party

message: Isn't the title of the movie "Dave Chappelle's Block Party" ? 65.96.98.74
:Not according to IMDB. --Howrealisreal 14:42, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The official website for the film continually refers to it as Dave Chappelle's Block Party.  I would assume the official website would be more of an authority on this matter than the Internet Movie Database. I say it should be moved to Dave Chappelle's Block Party. Jeff Silvers 16:17, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Crumbsucker 05:24, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: "The film gained prominence after its production, as it followed Chappelle's highly-publicized decision to walk away from a $50 million deal to continue his hit Chappelle's Show."
I don't get this sentence. --Gbleem 04:46, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Although that seems pretty straigtforward to me, the sentence has been improved.  Dave Chappelle#Season 3 turbulence has more information.  Hoof Hearted (talk) 17:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  followed what? 

message: This is the second time I've edited this. Why it was changed back is beyond me.
The "Broken Angel" is NOT in Bed-Stuy; it is in Clinton Hill, Brooklyn. Much of the film takes place in Clinton Hill, Brooklyn. I'm making the necessary changes.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheMac121 (talk • contribs) 16:44, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bed-Stuy
Talk:Antifeminism

message: in the 2nd paragraph, that text links to literacy page. It shouldnt, as thats not what is meant in the context. There are many reasons why theres a gender imbalance in college admissions, but literacy isnt one. Jaygo113 (talk) 21:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  lower college entrance rates of young men 

message: I've just removed several references to US antifeminism for UNDUE. Looking through this article, I think it definitely skews to a US-centric perspective, although feminism is a global issue. BrigadierG (talk) 12:56, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excessive United States perspective 

message: This has been inserted and removed and re-inserted in the lead; it probably should be covered in the article body, if only in a summary-style section linking to Men's rights movement, but it currently isn't. It'd be easy enough to cover - just a little bit summarizing Men's_rights_movement#Antifeminism, with a toplink to that article. But where should it be placed in this article's structure? As a top-level subsection? Or does it fit into one of the existing subsections? -- Aquillion (talk) 21:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: The men's rights movement was placed in the 21st century section so it is in the body, although I'm also not sure exactly where it should go because it originated in the 20th century. —Panamitsu (talk) 22:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, we could always move it to the 20th century. If we did that we might add a sentence about how it started in the 70's as a generally pro-feminist men's liberation movement and then split into pro- and anti-feminist strands (which is covered in the history section of its own article.) --Aquillion (talk) 03:56, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep that sounds like a good idea. —Panamitsu (talk) 05:24, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Men's rights movement
Talk:Dynamic theory of gravity/Archive 2

message: : Pjacobi, Salsb, William M. Connolley all edit this article in a POV fashion. As seen from the discussion, they are in a mission to edit with a POV and make anything to do with Telsa inaccurate. 216.185.232.203 8 July 2005 00:44 (UTC)
:: Hi, gentle patron of multiple libraries in Kansas City, could you please create a single user account like the rest of us?  Appearing in an edit war as a succession of numerical IP addies just makes you look a bit sneaky, which doesn't help your case.  It certainly doesn't make you more anonymous than if you created a user with a suitable moniker, such as Teslafan.  I'm new to Wikipedia, don't know Salsb, WMC, and I've barely seen any articles by PJ either, so I think I'm unbiased.  And I'm knowledgeable about classical gravitation.  You seem to be convinced that the world is giving short schrift to Tesla in the field of theoretical physics.  I doubt that's true, but if you think I'm wrong, how about this: instead of continuing in a pointless edit war, please create a user, reply to me on this page, and support some of your assertions with citations of reliable scholarly publication, or anything the factual accuracy of which I can reasonably verify.  It seems you spend a lot of time in places with lots of books, so presumably some of them support some of your assertions, right?---CH  (talk) 10:31, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: POV editing and inaccuracy
Talk:Magnetocaloric effect

message: Sorry, this is my first Wikipedia article, so please be patient --Mtodorov 69 09:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: ) Thats fine!! But... if we merge them, then under the magnetocaloric and not calorific effect title. This effect is known by the scientific community more as magnetocaloric effect :) --Grandonia 18:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Imagine I come as guest into your house, and while you are on vacation, I throw your furniture through the window and bring in mine. Now it is my house, right?
I am very much disappointed what I was not asked for opinion before my work was deleted and I think if I knew this will happen that I would save myself lots of effort, research and work on the picture that is thrown out and not completely substitued by meaning.
This work now is more historically correct obviously, but it is incomprehensible and it lacks soul. I think it is not in the spirit of Wikipedia to do authorship and page hijacking, but I guess what is done is done. -- Mtodorov 69 23:38, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Takeover
Talk:List of military conflicts spanning multiple wars

message: Can anybody find a source for note 1?  Even if normal diplomatic relations never resumed after WWII, wouldn't the dissolution of the USSR have ended any state of war between Russia and Japan?  Zelmerszoetrop 09:31, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Addendum:  I've found evidence of diplomatic relations between Russia and Japan, oepn consulates, trade, etc.  This would not be possible if the two countries were still are war.  I'm removing note 1.  For archival purposes, note 1 read: :  Russia remains technically at war with Japan. Zelmerszoetrop 20:46, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Russo-Japanese War?

message: I added a bunch of Asian multi-war conflicts, since there really weren't many on this list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.40.186.184 (talk) 03:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asian wars 

message: theres still a incomplete tag here. i think i know where its incomplete. the section for Americas and Europe could use a Spanish indian wars section that is to say Spain versus Aboriginal Cultures of the Americas this string of conflicts by the spanish in the americas would have conquest of the aztecs and the inca empire and also any notable conflicts the spanish has against american natives till around the year 1800 when de-dolonization era was begining. 69.221.170.231 (talk) 18:20, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: incomplete tag and my thoughts
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-02-20/News and notes

message: The number of articles on Norwegian Wikipedia just passed 50,000 - very easy to check here [no.wikipedia.org]. Regarding the Spanish, how come they have more users than pages? The article states 100,000 users, but they have only 95,000 articles, can that be correct? Ulflarsen 09:35, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We'll probably add Norwegian next week, then.  Regarding more users than pages, yes, it's possible.  According to Special:Statistics, the English Wiki currently has 985,489 articles and 967,329 registered users- so it's not a big stretch.  Ral315 (talk) 22:03, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of articles, Norwegian and number of users, Spanish