Talk:Sylvia Mathews Burwell

message: The content that was parsed and reverted conforms to all rules and goals of providing NPOV encyclopedic content, unless of course one is a liberal denialist spinbot.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.106.39.30 (talk) 15:08, 11 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Liberal Denialism 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Sylvia Mathews Burwell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/organization_office/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:09, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Her archived profile from MetLife shows some of her other associations. Knope7 (talk) 03:43, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Archived source 

message: We list the acting directors as Burwell's predecessor and successor as Director of OMB. For consistency, we should use the Acting Secretary of HHS as her successor. The Acting Secretary was in place for weeks. Knope7 (talk) 04:16, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The issue of who to list in info-boxes has been popping up the last few months. Burwell's page lists Acting Directors of OMB, so I am looking at internal consistency for this article. I think this is a bigger issue that would warrant discussion somewhere beyond Tillerson's talk page. Knope7 (talk) 04:25, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The Big Four Cabinet positions, Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, Secretary of the Treasury, and Attorney General do not list acting occupants.  I really don't think 38-year-old HHS or 47-year-old OMB should take precedence over those major departments. Changing the precedent of excluding actings is what should warrant discussion. OCNative (talk) 04:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, the template does not include a field for acting.  People have been manually adding , which is indicative that the template was not meant to include acting occupants. OCNative (talk) 04:35, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have yet to come across a stated policy on including acting successors in infoboxes.  Those four cabinet positions may have consistency but there are dozens of other government positions that do not appear to follow the same convention uniformly, including OMB which affects this article. I am not convinced there is a stated policy on this. IMO, the article should be internally consistent and not including the acting replacement would be inconsistent. Moreover, the argument that acting department heads are of little consequence would have been a stronger argument before Sally Yates served as Acting Attorney General. Knope7 (talk) 01:25, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Successor 

message: she stoled 2000 dollars from me lady with all that money a theif place in hell for you lady 2600:6C4A:1C00:13BE:DDFD:2948:4602:1701 (talk) 15:12, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  robber theif lyer fruader