Talk:Sustainable fashion

message: to the lead by  (a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki Ed/Northeastern University/Advanced Writing in the Business Administration Professions (Spring 2018)) is too verbose, and contains claims that belong in other sections (if they belong in this article at all). I have reverted to the previous version, and I am pasting 's text below. There may be something that can be extracted from this text and integrated into appropriate sections in the article, but in its current form it is too verbose, and the style lacks continuity/smoothness. (For example, why is there an apparently random sentence about a movie in the middle of the paragraph?) Remember that per MOS:LEAD, "The lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article". (The quoted text below is from  by .) Biogeographist (talk) 11:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that the section of the article you have pasted here should just be moved to a different section of the article. I was working on drafting a longer section describing "fast fashion" and this could be helpful to add to this section.  Ndani06 (talk) 15:34, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  First paragraph too verbose 

message: in the section of fast fashion when the issue of "rich vs. poor" comes into play, it would be best to include some citation on the discrepancy or delete that part from the section to remain neutral Joannaucsd (talk) 01:17, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Fast Fashion" section suggestions 

message: Recently, this article has again seen a flurry of new editors and single purpose accounts adding poorly sourced, non-neutrally written, and essay-like content. It appears very similar to me to what is seen when a group of students are assigned to "fix" a wikipedia article for an assignment but have not had proper instruction in wikipedia's core policies. If this is what is going on, then students and in particular, those who are assigning/assessing them, should start by reading WP:ASSIGN, and then go to the Wiki Education Foundation and follow their guidelines in order to actually improve the article, rather than continuing to add to the significant issues it already has. Thanks Melcous (talk) 06:02, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had to revert this sort of stuff on at least five different but related articles this morning. It's a regular thing, naive commentary, sort of correct and sort of sourced sometimes, but awful writing. Editors have tried to get some sort of response from them in the past, to no avail. Some articles have become top heavy with these semi related factoids. I just keep lining up the ducks. - Roxy the dog  06:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student editing? 

message: — Assignment last updated by StellaJiang333 (talk) 02:59, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu

message: — Assignment last updated by SummerJesNathaL (talk) 14:23, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: English Composition 2

message: — Assignment last updated by Idontlikewriting (talk) 08:16, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Immersive Design Research Lab

message: — Assignment last updated by WikiEdit7205 (talk) 17:05, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Equitable Futures - Internet Cultures and Open Access

message: — Assignment last updated by RoccNRoll (talk) 00:39, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Digital Cultures