lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Siege of Osaka

message: Beacuse the castle structre is Tokugawa style. In 1615, the castle was destroyed by fire. aftermath, shougate built a new castle and completed in 1629.--Burning Flame 10:21, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  reason for remove image 

message: Burning Flame, thank you for your contributions, and I hope you do not mind me cleaning up your language. Please do continue to help out expanding this article. I do have two concerns, though. First, what is "Honta-Ryo" meant to represent? Is it 「ほんたりょ」, or is it Honda-ryō (ほんだりょう), or something else? Second, I wonder if it could be made clearer which warriors are on which side. Reading about a battle between Kimura Shigenari and Ii Naotaka, or between Todo Takatora and Chosokabe Morichika, it is not obvious to someone unfamiliar with the subject, like myself, who is with Tokugawa (Eastern) and who with Toyotomi (Western). Thank you. LordAmeth 22:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 

message: "History indicates that the legendary swordsman Miyamoto Musashi participated in the battle on the Toyotomi side. It is unknown how he fared but what is known is that Musashi was spared by Ieyasu for unknown reasons." According to someone much better informed than me, writing in the 
Miyamoto_Musashi talk page, he in fact fought on the Tokugawa side. This would of course explain why Ieyasu spared him. Maproom (talk) 21:48, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miyamoto Musashi 

message: At the time I write, the article states that "Naahime, daughter of Hideyori and his concubine, was not sentenced to death."  That phrasing makes it sound like Naahime was Hideyori's concubine as well as his daughter.  I'm not an expert on this subject, but I doubt that's the case.  The information was initially introduced with the phrasing "Hideyori's concubine daughter, Naahime, was not sentenced to death" and was then re-phrased by another editor.  It sounds like the original editor intended to say that Naahime was a concubine (to somebody, not necessarily Hideyori).  I'm removing the reference to concubinage; feel free to re-insert, hopefully in a less ambiguous manner, if you have more information on the subject.  Baileypalblue (talk) 01:33, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was Naahime's daughter also his concubine? 

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture :File:The Siege of Osaka Castle.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for September 18, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-09-18. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 13:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Talk:Siege of Odawara (1590)

message: Wiki is filled with these on many historical articles.
Can someone explain what value listing this game has on the subject matter?
I think it should be removed. HammerFilmFan (talk) 03:43, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  video game ref 

message: Hi, Kaihime was not present at Odawara during the siege because he defended the Oshi castle in Oshi's siege. --Matiaz78 (talk) 08:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  question about Kaihime presence at Odawara 
Talk:Battle of Tondibi

message: I provided details with references for Songhai's force.  Can someone come up with references for Judar's force.  i've seen different numbers everywhere.  Thnx in advance and everyone keep up the good work. :)Scott Free 19:31, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Judar's force 

message: Who vets the sources?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sheik Way-El (talk • contribs) 15:27, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another article full of misinformation
Talk:First Battle of Panipat

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:44, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: I have made a small change in the article to bring Table of Content at the top of the page. It was at the bottom of the page! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 00:16, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made A Small Change 

message: The uploaded image seems to be without any justification. There is also some reason to think that it might be based off a certain video game.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taninamdar (talk • contribs) 03:27, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for the political map of the aftermath 

message: I was confused by this section in Background
″He sent an ambassador to Ibrahim, asking him to get punished by him and he is rightful to the throne of the country, however, the ambassador was detained ...″
47.156.163.253 (talk) 01:10, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like an editor had made some language errors when adjusting the wording of that paragraph a couple years ago. I've now restored the original wording. Thanks for the heads up.Alivardi (talk) 03:06, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asking Him to Get Punished by Him
Talk:Battle of Sellasia

message: His army of 20,000 infantrymen was composed of Spartan hoplites, possibly Spartan pikemen (according to Plutarch, Cleomenes had armed 2.000 Lacedaemonians in the Macedonian way),
Who's the dumbass that wrote that? Plutarch clearly states there were 6000 Spartan phalangites, not hoplites! I'm gonna edit this...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.83.151.167 (talk) 23:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spartan Phalanx 

message: Many sources and books I have read say Cleomenes III only can gather 10.000 soldiers, Spartans, allied and mercenaries. My question is: 10.000 or 20.000?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.84.128.125 (talk) 01:03, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Total streng of Spartan army on Sellasia
Talk:Battle of the Vorskla River

message: Vytautas' defeat at the Vorskla effectively blocked Lithuanian expansion to Southern Ruthenia. His enormous state also lost hard-won access to the Black Sea.
The saying that state “also lost” could be misleading because the “lost” of lands was short lived and Mongols did not materialized their victory, because soon afterwards Grand Duchy of Lithuania driven back Mongols and the lands were reclaimed (Vytautas not dead yet). The same thing points maps:
http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d101/no_name_2/ldk15.jpg (15c. Vyt still a live)
http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d101/no_name_2/imageXV.gif (same)
http://s34.photobucket.com/albums/d101/no_name_2/?action=view¤t=TornTr.jpg (Vyt dead but somehow I still sea link to Black sea)
my suggestion  is to change “also lost” to temprory lost or to leave “also lost” and explain a situation, because now it looks like Grand Duchy of Lithuania lost forever these lands….
:This article is about the battle and its immediate consequences. No need to retell the whole history of Eastern Europe here. --Ghirla -трёп- 16:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  And this is not  whole history of Eastern Europe - this is a direct and  immediate consequence. same as was writen in other parts of wiki - A large victory in 1399, for instance, only briefly delayed Lithuanian control spreading all the way to the Black Sea. and the immediate consequences was a temp. lost.  Besides one word is not the whole history, but if you so frighten  of the words, maybe it is more simply just write - mongols/tatars smashed vytautas army....without any explan. ? M.K 17:29, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: just wondering what your silence could mean... M.K 11:01, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: misleading statement

message: This article claims that Tokhtamysh was killed during the Battle of Vorskla in 1399, yet another Wilkipedia page (linked to this one) suggests that he was killed in 1406 or even 1407 by assassins sent by Edigu. Also there was an incorrect statement that Tokhtamysh united Blue and White Hordes, to form the Golden Horde. At the time of Tokhtamysh  the ruler of the White Horde was his former ally and later sworn enemy Timur (Timur Lenk) who eventually defeated Tokhtamysh and destroyed the Golden Horde. All history articles on the Wilkipedia history pages have a lot of these inconsistencies and need cleaning. Vitoldus44 18:35, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  When did Tokhtamysh die? 

message: The statment "As the Tatar power was on the wane, Dmitriy soundly defeated the Horde Battle of Kulikovo (1380), only to be besieged in Moscow and defeated in 1382 by the new Khan Tokhtamysh." is incorrect, since Tokhtamysh was not a khan of the Blue Horde, but of the White Horde. The leader of the Blue Horde, Mamai, who was defeated on the Kulikovo field, was an enemy to Tokhtamysh. With respect, Ko Soi IX 10:30, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, thank you for spotting. Union's name was incorrect. Renata (talk) 18:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Factually incorrect
Talk:Battle of Stångebro

message: The "combatants" section of the infobox seems misleading. The forces listed there as "Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth" were commanded by Sigismund in his capacity as King of Sweden (although part of the army was Polish), and the forces listed as "Sweden" were commanded by a rebel. This was a civil war, and calling it "Sweden defeated Poland-Lithuania" sounds very much like winner-POV historiography. -- Jao 20:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's much better now, thanks. -- Jao (talk) 12:11, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:Ansalon

message: I deleted the Dragonlance category from this entry, as the guidelines suggest not to use both the category and subcategory. -- ReyBrujo 00:12, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed category

message: So what more has to be here to remove the stub from it?  Also, what books would be useful in contributing to this article? DoomsDay349 01:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding 

message: What should and should not be here?  For instance, I don't think we should add such things as, for instance, the header Abanasinia with subheaders describing locations, as they would basically be the List of Dragonlance locations.  I want to know exactly what info needs to be here.  Thanks! DoomsDay349 04:17, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  How to Organize 

message: If you are annoyed or upset by the notability template, just ignore them, rather than reverting them without justification. The template has been put here for good reason; the article does not cite any reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability and until it does, the template should remain. 
Note that Ansalon is a fictional location within a fictional location (Krynn), neither of which provide any evidence of notability. --Gavin Collins (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This is a notable subject which has yet to prove its notability, thus why I changed the template to , although my changes were then reverted. BOZ (talk) 16:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Philip Cowley

message: Thanks for updates, iceaxejuggler.  Is he not yet a professor?  These pages seem to think so: http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=%22Professor+Philip+Cowley%22&meta=
He is, I'm in his classes and they are taken by "Professor Philip Cowley"
:Ask him how old he is. Lol!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.250.228 (talk) 22:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Benign prostatic hyperplasia

message: :The 5α-reductase inhibitors are contraindicated in pregnant women ... pregnant women should not handle crushed or broken tablets.
Why is this here? Isn't BPH a male disease? --Amine Brikci N (talk) 12:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Nurses are typically women. Many pharmacists are women. There are also wives and girlfriends of men. Just touching the tablets is a risk to the fetus. MartinezMD (talk) 01:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  5α-Reductase inhibitors 

message: Reference #39 is no longer accessible (Üçer O (1 December 2011). "Giant prostatic hyperplasia: Case report and literature review". Dicle Medical Journal / Dicle Tıp Dergisi. 38 (4): 489–491. doi:10.5798/diclemedj.0921.2011.04.0072.)
Another SECONDARY SOURCE of comparable scope would be appropriate in its place. Could someone with ADMIN LEVEL access to making the appropriate reference change include the following as the new reference #39:
How to cite this article: 
Ojewola RW, Tijani KH, Fatuga AL, Onyeze CI, Okeke CJ. Management of a giant prostatic enlargement: Case report and review of the literature. Niger Postgrad Med J 2020;27:242-7
How to cite this URL:
Ojewola RW, Tijani KH, Fatuga AL, Onyeze CI, Okeke CJ. Management of a giant prostatic enlargement: Case report and review of the literature. Niger Postgrad Med J [serial online] 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 26];27:242-7. Available from: https://www.npmj.org/text.asp?2020/27/3/242/289919 JamesRichardFishman (talk) 20:25, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I updated the citation. MartinezMD (talk) 18:38, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated reference 

message: The lifestyle section mentions reducing alcohol consumption, but this seems to contradict an earlier comment in the Diet section about "a strong negative association with alcohol intake". Perhaps we could add a comment about the uncertainty here. (At a guess, alcohol consumption may reduce insulin which may reduce bph) Leblam (talk) 11:10, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lifestyle
Talk:Interstate 475 (Ohio)

message: Notice a terminus being moved from "turnpike".  How was the terminus handled up to that time?  I ask this because it says, for the present configuration, there is no connection to the turnpike, and you'd have to drive about 2 miles on non-expressway to connect between I-475 (Ohio) & Ohio Turnpike.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 15:38, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The terminus was near Perrysburg, at the current I–75 interchange with US 20. I–75 was planned to follow a route closer to the current Ohio State Route 25 route. Detcin (talk) 17:01, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  History mentions the Turnpike 

message: This is a question I was wondering since when you look at its design, it is about half of a full loop. So can it be classified as a partial beltway? NintendoTTTEfan2005 (talk) 21:35, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this highway a partial beltway?
Talk:Interstate 475 (Michigan)

message: The opening paragraph says 16.99 miles while the infobox says 16.866. Which is it? Can't we just round up to 17 miles? TomCat4680 (talk) 11:30, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Imzadi 1979 →  14:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Length
Talk:Battle of Albulena

message: * - acknowledge I should have checked this before proposing deletion. Addhoc 23:13, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Search for references

message: Telegraf news source say that Ottomam had 50k troops and Skandberg had 17k troops butAlbanian nationalists exxgreate strengths.Why? İnfo table just has 1 citutation about strengths and this source say them. 78.175.229.155 (talk) 17:32, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strength 

message: Every source says that the numbers were 10k Vs 80k so can I get an explanation who changed the numbers Balliu1 (talk) 16:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The numbers
Talk:Taladas

message: Removed the category of Dragonlance, since it is suggested not to use both the subcategory and the main category at the same time. Also, the External Links should be merged with the References. -- ReyBrujo 00:22, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.ddcc 03:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Category

message: I've managed to check out the blades of the tiger book from my library, so I'll be doing some work on this article. Just a heads up. ddcc 02:48, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing

message: Do we know anything about arcane magic on Taladas?  Chenhsi 05:28, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic 

message: I went ahead and added Shadows of the Flame to the published materials section. Eclecticvox 06:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Published Materials 

message: I've read many Dragonlance/Ansalon books. The gnomes there -are-, collectively, pretty dumb. (I know, citation needed, but this was brought up in the article as of this comment posting). Lots42 (talk) 23:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gnomes
Talk:Battle of Abukir (1799)

message: The 'battle' section is poorly written and could really use an overhaul. - March 2013  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.1.24.170 (talk) 11:02, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: The battle section is a terrible and poor translation of the same article on the French wikipedia page......  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.98.70.136 (talk) 14:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

text: Just noticed the same thing.  The captured number must also include some of the wounded, 2,000 to be exact.  Or they revived some of the dead.  Either way, we need to fix these stats.Tubbyty (talk) 04:04, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

text: I fixed the table, but not the body of the article.  I found two books online, both have around 13,000 casualties, significantly higher than what is currently stated.  Unfortunately, I do not have access to the reference cited for most of the body.  Anyone help?Tubbyty (talk) 04:44, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

message: In line 1, it says "the Battle of Abukir (or Abukir)"... Is there supposed to be another name in the bracket? Perhaps Abu Qir?The Average Wikipedian (talk) 15:43, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed it.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uspzor (talk • contribs) 13:57, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Abukir" 

message: There's a paragraph that ends with this sentence
Under the convention, the British army came back in France.
I have no idea what this means. Could someone explain?
Montalban (talk) 06:41, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It was just wrong. It's right now. Uspzor (talk) 13:54, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Under the convention, the British army came back in France. 

message: There are some translation problems. Here is one sentence that is incomprehensible. "Murat dared not to overload as he saw the shot that struck above his head." Is it possible that 'overload' should be 'charge'? Even with this change the sentence does not sound right. Djmaschek (talk) 22:08, 26 August 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right, it's a mistranslation for "charge". The whole § does not make much sense because it is a automatic translation. It is perhaps not worth to translate it from scrap, because the French article has no source and doesn't seem very reliable (full of doubtful colorful "heroic" details, probably from some embellished 19th c. accounts).--Phso2 (talk) 17:05, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation issues

message: All the article explains this is a French victory but you wrote Ottoman victory in the box. This looks absurd. I changed it accordingly. Thank you.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:CB1C:839:9400:8D20:5193:AAB:DAE5 (talk) 20:22, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: French victory
Talk:Interstate 575

message: This concerns POV tag cleanup.  Whenever an POV tag is placed, it is necessary to also post a message in the discussion section stating clearly why it is thought the article does not comply with POV guidelines, and suggestions for how to improve it.  This permits discussion and consensus among editors.  From WP tag policy: Drive-by tagging is strongly discouraged. The editor who adds the tag must address the issues on the talk page, pointing to specific issues that are actionable within the content policies, namely Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Simply being of the opinion that a page is not neutral is not sufficient to justify the addition of the tag. Tags should be added as a last resort.  Better yet, edit the topic yourself with the improvements.  This statement is not a judgement of content, it is only a cleanup of frivolously and/or arbitrarily placed tags.  No discussion, no tag.Jjdon (talk) 22:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV tag 
Talk:Belfield Park

message: *Here is a list of pages created by me.You seem to be intent on putting some sort of tag on all my pages so make sure you get every single one.--Play Brian Moore 00:31, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any need for it anymore?--Play Brian Moore 17:05, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up Tag? 

message: This page should never be deleted. Belfield Park is one of the oldest grounds in the league(admittedly a poor quality league). It should be kept even when it goes in the same way that Glenmalure Park was. Cheers--Play Brian Moore 03:37, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strong keep this is an FAI National League ground for heaven's sake. If and when they finally move, we can consider deleting it 
Talk:Interstate 675 (Michigan)

message: What is the name of the bridge?  Is it the Henry G Marsh Bridge (per the route description paragraph), the Henry Marsh Bridge (penultimate sentence of the History section) or the Marsh Bridge (Main Page blurb)? Kevin McE (talk) 11:44, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It is nicknamed the Marsh Bridge, but is actually the Henry G. Marsh Bridge. I’ve fixed the inconsistencies. Moonlandingwasahoax (talk) 21:06, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency
Talk:Dwingeloo 1

message: Not to denigrate Hurricane Devon's work, and it is nice to see my image, but what is the justification for the statement that Dw1 is "much bigger then our "Sister Galaxy," Andromeda."?  IIRC, our Nature paper concluded that it was of the order of a half or a quarter of the mass of the Milky Way, and the HI column density from the Westerbork observations pictured at Dwingeloo 2 suggested that that estimate was not far off.
The second image is also misleading: the zone of avoidance is not caused principally  by the bulge of the Milky Way, but rather by its disk.  In any event, I doubt that Dw1 will be that spectacular: it is not that large (the Maffei galaxies and IC342 are almost certainly larger) or close (they are all around 3 Mpc, and Andromeda is much closer, less than 1 Mpc). -- ALoan (Talk) 00:37, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I didn't realize that Dwingeloo was smaller then the Milky Way.  I fixed the problem.  I also moved my segment on "How Dwingeloo will be better seen in th future" and moved it to the Maffei Group Artical. — Hurricane Devon (Talk) 17:49, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments