lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Aza-Baylis–Hillman reaction

message: I do not have chemdraw.  the 2nd rxn scheme under the Asymmetric aza-BH heading showing the synthesis of the ionic liquid solvent discussed therein has an error.
the 2nd product/step in the rxn shows 2 malic acid molecules coordinated to a boron center.  note that the malic acid molecule depicted on the right side of the formula has a 5 carbon skeleton, whereas it should have a 4 carbon skeleton.  this mistake is repeated in the 3rd formula  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.6.52.200 (talk) 02:08, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Master data

message: Not sure whether other sites have taken the definition from here, or whether the original editor was confused by inaccurate definitions elsewhere as no sources were given. Previous version of seriously confused reference data (key information) with master data (master copy of information shared by two or more business processes, applications or consumers). Have started to clean up, adding references, but have yet to find more academic back-up similar to what I was taught 30+ years ago. MaryEFreeman (talk)
Totally agree. Thanks for cleaning this up. I have some books on MDM at work, which might be a good reference. I'll check this. Joachim Selke   — Preceding undated comment added 14:51, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of Master Data

message: I think that the management challenges and needs section should be moved or integrated into the Master Data Management Wikipedia article. 
Also, if Kaleido is the reference for the information posted, it should be evaluated for neutral POV... each organization defines master data differently, with software providers usually favoring the definition to that organization's product. We need to make sure this isn't a commercial plug, or biased in any way. 
Will review. Please followup.
Joepiskai 15:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Management challenges

message: There have been many discussions regarding the appropriateness of terms such as master/slave, but very little is easily found via web searches regarding potential replacements of the term "master" in "master data" and "master data management".
It is particularly problematic because of the specific definition of the term "master data" and several of the easy synonyms such as "key data", "reference data", or "main data" either conflict with other definitions or are not clear enough.
I bring this up on the talk page of Wikipedia not to try to generate discussion or find a resolution, but to inquire whether any people knowledgable in this field might have useful citations, references, or links to discussion on this topic that could be added to the article.
As an example, take a look at the section on the article Master/slave (technology) for "Terminology concerns".
Daniel (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inclusion and Diversity attention
Talk:Sunnyside Royal Hospital

message: Intend to rewrite the article. Article text was moved from Hillside, Angus from contribution made by User:Eckieboy. Agree that this text was copied from the source you claim, although some additional rewording and changes have already been made to the article. I understand that the original text came from Angus District Council, but would be glad to be proved mistaken!!! → friedfish 15:44, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: hangon

message: Given there is an article on the very similarly named Sunnyside Hospital in New Zealand I wonder if it would be worth stating at the start that 'this article is about the Hospital in Angus, Scotland, for the similar named hospital in Christchurch New Zealand see Sunnyside Hospital'? Dunarc (talk) 14:59, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sunnyside Hospital
Talk:Tirones

message: I thought the singular of tirones was tiro: "Antiqui, sicut inuenitur in libris, hoc genere exercuere tirones... Idemque clauas ligneas dupli aeque ponderis pro gladiis tironibus dabant... Contra illum palum tamquam contra aduersarium tiro cum crate illa et claua uelut cum gladio se exercebat et scuto". Will correct unless anyone has an objection.
Also suggest adding some content e.g.:
In the 4th Century A.D., Vegetius describes his ideal, rigorous weapons training, in contrast to the  lax habits of his own day:"Of aspirants for enlistment were required good eyes and sound and vigorous bodies; but no definite height, certain units excepted, seems to have been prescribed... After taking the oath (sacramentum), the recruits entered upon an intensive and apparently endless course of training. The success of Roman arms, like all others, came from drill, discipline and training....
The ancients, as books reveal, trained recruits in the following way. They wove rounded shields of wicker, like basketry, in such a way that the frame would be double the weight of a battle shield. Similarly, they gave the recruits wooden foils, also double weight, instead of swords. 
Next, they were trained at the stakes not only in the morning but also in the afternoon...
The recruit, who is trained at the stake with the foil, is also made to throw spearshafts - heavier than real javelins - against that stake as though against a man... For both muscular strength is increased, and knowledge and experience of throwing are gained by training ....
But nearly a third or a quarter of the young men who are more capable must be trained at every opportunity at those same stakes with wooden bows and practise arrows...
The young men, who on difficult expeditions had to carry both provisions and arms, must be continuously made to carry a burden with a weight of sixty pounds and to march as often as possible with the military pace. And this is not thought to be difficult, if practiced. For constant practice makes everything easy." (Epitoma Rei Militari 1:I-XVIIII)
Salvianus 23:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Made that case correction & added first part of the quote - wouldn't want to bore anyone. Salvianus 14:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm changing the quote to a citable source and adding detail. Salvianus 19:04, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The way the quote has been incorporated makes it seem like the words are Vegetius', whoch they are not. Please consider clarifying the attribution. 93.67.251.37 (talk) 06:38, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Miami

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:25, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: There is a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One World (TV series). --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:37, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  One World (TV series) nominated for deletion
Template talk:Liverpool F.C.

message: Let's try to keep the number of links on this box down - I've noticed less important articles, like 100PWSTK and the 2005 CL qualification being added, when the box only neews thhe key articles, the category can do the rest. To this end I've added a link to the category. ArtVandelay13 15:54, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Number of links
Talk:Valby

message: I propose merging White Houses, Valby into Valby. The White Houses are a development of 81 houses within Valby. Though they may be notable, I think it would be better suited on Valby's page where it could be contextualised alongside other neighbourhoods, such as "Old Valby" which are currently under the Valby today heading. Uffda608 (talk) 13:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger discussion
Talk:Persianate society

message: I'm now editing my translation (traditional Chinese). I still had hard time understanding the meaning of "as well as the Qarmatians who entertained Persianate notions of cyclical time even though they did not invoke the Iranian genealogies in which these precepts had converged" Thanks for your kind attention.ThomasYehYeh (talk) 11:48, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe it may have something to do with the Seljuqs, but since that last part of the sentence is unreferenced and Qarmatians are not mentioned within the article(which violates WP:LEAD), I would not bother adding that part to your translation. --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:08, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes - I suspect "converged" should be "emerged". Johnbod (talk) 16:27, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for making my translation a bit easier. Further questions: "Persian miniature from the Shahnameh of Shah Tahmasp: Rustam asleep, while his horse Rakhsh slays a lion, fol. 118r." 1. Is the horse fending off the lion, or slaying the lion? and 2. What do [fol. 118r] stand for?ThomasYehYeh (talk) 02:22, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Not sure - the British Museum says "fights". Folio (effectively page/sheet) 118 recto. Johnbod (talk) 03:19, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not trying to be picky, but if there's anyone who's familiar especially with this part of the Shahnameh, can shed light on the outcome of the story, I'll be very much obliged. Thanks to you all for sharing with me the knowledge and thoughts about this article.ThomasYehYeh (talk) 03:41, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Need original writer or anyone who's familiar with this subject to elaborate
Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Yoshiaki Omura

message: I began mediating the Omura case after User:Aguerriero left Wikipedia (?). Richard, Crum, and I discussed some avenues to explore and began discussing the disputed material. The discussion was long and tedious, and yielded little if anything, but was civil. During that time, Rat resurfaced as his provocative account Whiffle, but relented that strategy and joined the discussion as TheStainlessSteelRat. Eventually we came to the conclusion that agreement between the involved parties was unlikely and we considered putting up an RfC. 
A couple of offers were made by outside editors to draft a stub, but these never came to fruition.
Then I was away for about a week (week of USA Thanksgiving) and, when I came back, the situation had regressed to a revert war. A very basic stub had been produced -- I'm not sure by whom -- which I attempted to encourage work from, but both sides pushed in opposite directions towards other versions they preferred. Eventually, with no reasonable end in sight, I decided to close the case as unworkable.
Despite Richard's stated intention to continue appropriating my words, I do not believe that Crum is solely to blame for this conflict. I believe that all parties with whom I dealt in the mediation (I had no contact with Philosophus) have, at some time or another, edited tendentiously, edit warred, failed to act in good faith, displayed incivility, and the like. I do not hold Crum to be the reason that the mediation case could come to no reasonable end; I ended the mediation because no avenue available could reach agreement between these editors.
I will detail specific incidents, with diffs, in a formal statement if this case is accepted.
Peace. - Che Nuevara 19:28, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement by Che Nuevara 

message: I believe that this case has issues of WP:AUTO and multiple violations of WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL to address. Mediation has failed to produce any positive result due to strong disagreements by the opposing parties, so an arbitration case to determine what the cause of the potentially tendentious editing and edit warring is and how to remedy it would be beneficial, as the disputes between the parties has made it impossible for any progress to be made on the article despite numerous blocks for 3rr violations and full protection of the page. Cowman109Talk 02:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Statement by mostly uninvolved [[user:Cowman109]] 

message: I had unprotected this article recently and now a new SPA has started removing big chunks of content.  I assume that is what this arbitration is about?  Do I need to re-protect it?  —Wknight94 (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protection?
Talk:Capital Region of Denmark

message: It to complicated to figure out how to say things. Y'all should make it say it so I know. I know it's possible to do I've seent it with mine own two eye bee balls gf r eery 160.2.0.22 (talk) 10:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complicated 

message: I am here for assistance needed in the copy editing of this page. UltimateGames357 (talk) 13:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copy editing 

message: none of the regions of Denmark have an official flag (fareo islands, and Greenland are not regions and if they are then so is Denmark proper). that one is a logo. Fanmanlyer (talk) 14:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  the flag
Talk:Charter Oak Unified School District

message: Pages need to be created for the schools.
FrottonCSEA 16:28, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

message: Not-notable elementary school, should be mentioned in district article MB 19:39, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Badillo Elementary School]] 

message: Non-notable elementary school should be mentioned in district article MB 19:41, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Cedergrove Elementary School]]
Talk:Kolding

message: I'm myself a resident of Kolding, and I'm slightly appaled by the state of the article (I'm in the process of re-writing it) - the battles are never talked about, nor are they part of elementary history about Kolding. Should they still be included in the article? It seems to me they're just there to make the article appear longer. — Lasse Havelund (p · t · c) 18:36, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Battles? 
Talk:Næstved

message: It would be nice to have a picture or even article on the Kompagnie house for the illustration of Hanseatic League.--Kresspahl 08:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There seems to be some confusion regarding this building, because the building currently referred to as  Kompagnihuset only got this name in the 17th century. (illustration) This building is located at the corner of Kompagnistræde and Møntergade. Valentinian T / C 16:08, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hanseatic warehouses in Næstved

message: Can I suggest that this list takes up a lot of space without adding much.  It would be better to have a link to an external site with an up-to-date list. --JBellis (talk) 12:38, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  City Council members 
Talk:David Peoples

message: As this screenwriter is always credited as David Webb Peoples, I suggest that this article be moved to his full name.  This will alleviate the need to pipe link his name in every article.  Any thoughts on this? ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 16:07, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Do note he was credited as David Peoples on his first several films, including Blade Runner. He wasn't credited as David Webb Peoples until Unforgiven. Then he went back to David Peoples for Twelve Monkeys. So he actually has more credits without the middle name. Probably best to leave it as it is, with a re-direct from the full name. - Gothicfilm (talk) 04:12, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The BFI website has him as David Webb Peoples and notes "Usually known as David Peoples prior to 1990".  As it would appear that he currently goes by David Webb Peoples, is it not more appropriate to move the page to this?  --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:53, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I am now wavering.  The BFI site would certainly be a reliable source, but is it enough to divine his preference?  And is his preference enough to justify a move?  As I say, I am not as certain as I was two days ago. ---RepublicanJacobiteTheFortyFive 13:51, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggested move 
Talk:Evolution as theory and fact/Rewrite

message: --Filll 20:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fact vs. Theory stickers  

message: *Argument: Evolution is true science, not ‘just a theory’  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Filll (talk • contribs) 05:09, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  AiG article on theory and fact etc 

message: * Predictions of empirical data from the theory of common descent have been so consistent that biologists often refer to it as the "fact of evolution" (Theobald 2004).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Filll (talk • contribs) 18:12, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Another quote evolution is fact

message: * Lenny Flank article IS EVOLUTION "JUST A THEORY"? 1995  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Filll (talk • contribs) 22:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Another

message: *arguments creationists should not use includes theory not fact ??
*recent florida law include "scientific theory of" as a compromise  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Filll (talk • contribs) 04:54, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: More
Talk:Emma Vieceli

message: What about mentioning Emma's musical career? Lotta singing in this podcast http://cdn1.libsyn.com/cni/CNI178.mp3?nvb=20090216163711&nva=20090217164711&t=070214109c1fd03234e11  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.105.176.27 (talk) 17:08, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It should be noted that the image used on the page is a self-portrait.  Should this be referenced?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.194.146.58 (talk) 17:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Portrait
Talk:I Saw Mommy Kissing Santa Claus (film)

message: I just fixed up the formatting in the Author section and added links, but can't currently upload pictures (haven't got 10 edits on this account,) so if someone would like to upload a picture for this, that'd be great. If it helps, I've found an appropriate picture, http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/M/MV5BMjE3OTAxNjQ5Nl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwNzMxOTEyMQ@@._V1._SY317_CR2,0,214,317_.jpg sourced from http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0282589/
~Jason (talk) 23:45, 8 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Allan Savory

message: There is no third-party corroboration of him killing 40,000 elephants. There's no corroboration he received government approval. No historical record of a 1950's Rhodesian international convention of elephant experts. No record of data collected. No published report. In fact, he was the captain of a special forces commando unit putting down insurgents and "problem elephants", and I just don't see the leader of a killing squad funded by ivory poaching convening a group of non-existent experts in a third world country to review data he never published. As such, I have changed factual claims under "Early work in southern Africa" to indicate they're based on him saying so. http://www.circleranchtx.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Selous-Scout-story-Savory.pdf
:I have added the appropriate citations documenting the specifics surrounding Rhodesia's elephant culling program and clarified some of the language to be more precise and neutral. In short, Allan has never claimed to have killed 40,000 elephants but rather clearly states that his early research in the Game Department advocated for culling of large numbers of elephants. This research is not publicly available since it was internal government work, but his advocacy on the matter was discussed publicly in a 1969 articled tited "Crisis in Rhodesia." Only after he left the department and was an MP did a government commission appoint Dr. Graham Child as Director of National Parks who then initiated the aforementioned culling program, and Dr. Child provides a precise estimate on number of elephants culled under his watch. As such, I am going to remove the flag on this section that disputes its neutrality. Bobbygill02 (talk) 18:13, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insufficient Sources 

message: I am new to Wikipedia editing and plan to revisit after learning more, but the 'Praise and Criticism' section seems pretty obviously biased. The sources may need verification.  ACole2 (talk) 05:20, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Praise and Criticism Section
Talk:The Register of the Victoria Cross

message: The word 'Congressional' in the description of the United States Medal of Honour is incorrect. Correct description is simply 'The Medal of Honour'.82.36.194.190 16:39, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I have removed the sentence "and the merest glimpse of that distinctive crimson ribbon on the brest of a veteran is sufficient to establish him as a military monarch in the minds of his fellow men, and nothing short of a god in the eyes of schoolboys throughout the world." as it is not encyclopedic in nature and basically non NPOV.
 I have revised the first sentence of the section headed "The Victoria Cross", as it was inaccurate and suggested that the medal is some kind of competition or ranking.  For example, the criteria for the Canadian VC are described as follows:"The Victoria Cross shall be awarded for the most conspicuous bravery, a daring or pre-eminent act of valour or self-sacrifice or extreme devotion to duty, in the presence of the enemy."  After any single military action, one or none or more than one VC could in theory be awarded.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Markcymru (talk • contribs) 16:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of sentence 

message: The article needs a lot a work but this correction would be more suitable for the article Ernest Sykes (VC) where the date is stated as 9 April 1917. It would be helpful to note that the action for which Ernest Sykes was awarded the VC is listed in official records and in many reference works, including The Register of the Victoria Cross as 19 April 1917. Other reference works indicate the correct day was Easter Monday, 9 April 1917 the start of the Battle of Arras. Anthony Staunton (talk) 14:40, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ernest Sykes (VC)
Talk:Skiamorph

message: I don't believe that "Skiamorph" is a word.  The fact that it is listed here as having the same definition as "Skeuomorph" suggests to me that this is just a misspelling, and not a different word.  Unless anyone can find sources, I will revert it to a redirect. johnpseudo 16:41, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Manuel González Prada

message: I noticed that there was another article for Manuel Prada, which focused on his literary contributions. I have merged those sections with the article found here on his life and political contributions. I placed a redirect on the other article, so there is now only one biographical article for this man from Peru. LordHarris 22:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I've found three different spellings for this gentlemen's name so far:
* Manuel Gonzales Prada — current article title
* Manuel Gonzalez Prada — currently a redirect to Manuel Gonzales Prada
* Manuel González Prada — name as given in the current lead section
Can we get an sourced, official spelling and make everything else consistent? Thanks. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 08:06, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let's get the name straight 