Talk:Andre Chad Parenzee

message: The complete judges ruling is available on-line in at least 2 places:
http://www.courts.sa.gov.au/judgments/Judgments2007/0427-SASC-143.htm
http://www.courts.sa.gov.au/judgments/PDFs/2007-SASC-143-Parenzee.pdf
and
http://garlan.rethinkingaids.info/Cases/Parenzee/
user:Nocontroversytalk 19:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, we've had a link to the complete ruling since the article was created - the one to the original court document, and not the one to the document as transcribed by AIDS "rethinkers". - Nunh-huh 19:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have to agree that the rethinkingaids website is best avoided as a source, except perhaps as a source for what AIDS denialists believe. Otherwise, it generally fails Wikipedia's guidelines on reliable sources. By the way, its webmaster, David Crowe, is occasionally active here (see User:DavidRCrowe). MastCell Talk 20:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Appeal to Supreme Court documents 

message: Note that an AIDS denialist newsgroup posting is soliciting denialists to "enhance and expand" this article. MastCell Talk 19:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Duesberg acknowledges that HIV exists, and so he would have been an uncomfortable fit with the defense strategy of claiming it doesn't. The defense did not offer any potential expert witnesses other than the two who were ultimately found not to be experts.  The article is simply reporting the judge's findings. If they're one-sided, you might want to consider the possibility that that's because one side is right.  - Nunh-huh 21:27, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, the Perth Group claims HIV doesn't exist, Duesberg claims it does, but is harmless. Their views are incompatible, and can't really both be argued in a single trial. - Nunh-huh 19:52, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, at this point I'm going to say a) Duesberg didn't discover HIV, and b) please read the talk page guidelines - this and other AIDS-related talk pages are not forums for general discussion about Duesberg, AIDS, etc. They are intended for specific suggestions on improving this article. If you want to propound AIDS denialism, Holocaust denialism, or other wholesome interests this IP seems to be associated with, please utilize other venues besides Wikipedia talk pages. MastCell Talk 21:54, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Off-wiki enlistment of editors 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Andre Chad Parenzee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071225192916/http://independentweekly.com.au:80/?article_id=10223958 to http://independentweekly.com.au/?article_id=10223958&PHPSESSID=49a793fa898a739311aa7670845ac70b
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070430062920/http://www.courts.sa.gov.au:80/judgments/Judgments2007/0427-SASC-143.htm to http://www.courts.sa.gov.au/judgments/Judgments2007/0427-SASC-143.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:25, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Andre Chad Parenzee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070501113107/http://www.courts.sa.gov.au/judgments/Judgments2007/0427-SASC-143.htm to http://www.courts.sa.gov.au/judgments/Judgments2007/0427-SASC-143.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:08, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified