Talk:Limited Edition (Magic: The Gathering)

message: Since I believe that the "Notable Cards" of a set is a highly contentious issue, I'm going to explain exactly why I included the cards I did, and post proof of their notability here. If you decide to add to, remove from, or change the list of Notable Cards, please do the same, so we can have at least a minimal amount of objectivity. Thank you!
The Power Nine is notable because: They have all proven to be game-bendingly powerful, and are all restricted in tournament play. They are the most sought-after and expensive Magic cards in existence, all commanding enormous prices on the secondary market; $200-$2000 is typical for a single Power Nine card.
:I'll remove the 'honorable mention' of Library of Alexandria. Multiple reasons. First of all, this is highly outdated. For at least five years now, it hasn't been anywhere near the most powerful land. Currently most players in the know would list at least Bazaar of Baghdad, Mishra's Workshop, Strip Mine and Tolarian Academy above it. Secondly, it is not in the Limited printing at all! The definition of Power Nine has become universally accepted, but this 'honorable mention' of Library definitely hasn't. Matti Nuortio, Oulu, Finland (talk) 13:10, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable cards 

message: *If I remember correctly, Mark Rosewater once said that all of Garfield's original keyword abilities (Trample, Flying, Protection -- I can't think of others) were still in the game.  In this article it mentions that banding was dropped from the game, but I'm not 100% sure if banding was in alpha. What do you guys know about this? Davemcarlson 23:29, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Dropped Mechanics

message: Can anyone find/make a picture that shows the differences between the corners of an alpha card and a non-alpha card? Setitup (talk) 22:54, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences in alpha borders 

message: A nomination can be found here: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 February 16#Category:Magic: The Gathering blocks to merge Magic categories back to blocks from sets. Feel free to join in on the discussion. Leitmotiv (talk) 18:43, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Magic categories to be merged back to block structure discussion 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Limited Edition (Magic: The Gathering). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070406063112/http://www.crystalkeep.com/magic/products/limited.php to http://www.crystalkeep.com/magic/products/limited.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:38, 23 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Many of the links are currently broken, notably all the Alpha Oops article links and the /dev/Joe error list. There are probably more that I didn't check. Archive.org seems to have them all saved so it should just need updating with those links.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ruler501 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Broken Links