lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Area code 780

message: Are pages devoted to area codes allowed? It doesn't seem to have anything notable about it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.251.129.187 (talk • contribs) 14:26, June 2, 2007 
:Check the "what links here" page. --Qyd (talk) 18:35, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Joseph Carroll (DIA)

message: Although Carroll served in the air force during the Vietnam War era, no reliable sources found as of yet state that he served in Vietnam. Accordingly, :Category:American military personnel of the Vietnam War was removed from the article for now until a reliable ref is found. Semper Fi! FieldMarine (talk) 11:27, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Vietnam War service
Talk:Overlock

message: So when did Overlock (serger) become common?
--24.236.151.207 22:59, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Great!

message: This article is a bit overoriented to people who already know a bit about sewing. What role do knives play and "hem rolling"? Hackwrench 06:12, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reader

message: I commented out a portion of the following sentence which seems to be NPOV: "The two most common are Juki and Brother, whose machines have come to define a level of speed and efficiency unmatched in the industry." The latter phrase represents a statement of fact regarding Brother/Juki machines versus other manufacturers' machines which is unsupported by any references in the article. This seems biased, and shouldn't be reinserted unless some evidence or opinion by an uninterested party can be found. --Kadin2048 03:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: The physical meaning of the following phrase is not clear:
: Overlock sewing machines usually run at high speeds, from 1000 to over 9000 rpm
What does that rotational speed (rpm) correspond to in terms of the number of stitches per minute, or linear speed (inches per second, centimetres per second, etc.)? --Theodore Kloba (talk) 13:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs clarification on speed description 

message: There is no mention here of the thread (composition, characteristics) used for overlock stitching.   Eg a haberdashery sells 'overlock thread', how is this different from 'general purpose' thread?   FreeFlow99 (talk) 14:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Overlock Thread
Talk:Cornelia

message: I don't Get this People plz help me update it more!I am a Cornelia, my family history told me that I belong to the fifth generation Cornelia who migrated to the Philippines from Spain. I was also told that we still have living relatives in Spain.
I would like to verify if my family name is really Spanish and still have Spanish relatives or a branch of the Cornelii from Italy. I need to understand why we have Cornelia and not Cornella for the spelling.. hope someone could help -- Aldryn Cornelia 202.21.195.18
:Sorry, Aldryn, this is the talk page for the disambiguation article about Cornelia. This talk page exists to discuss about ways to improve this article, and not for people to post their personal or private requests. With that said, Cornella might be a language corruption of Cornelia. Perhaps this evidence may help you. -- Pichote 23:04, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides, blanking a talk page (as you did recently) is considered vandalismPichote 08:53, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Hey people,
I'm doing a report on Cornelia I need some more info by tommorrow!
Don't know how to add this, but if someone notices:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cornelia_Fort
Biellen (talk) 01:28, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I don't get it
Talk:List of equipment of the Irish Army

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Adumbrativus (talk) 00:59, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: List of modern equipment of the Irish Army →  – The word "modern" is redundant, except if there is another article titled "List of antique equipment of the Irish Army", which there isn't. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:30, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 25 July 2021 
Talk:Johnny Kidd & the Pirates

message: this article is pretty deeply informal, down to the subheadings. Joeyramoney 06:20, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  User comment 

message: Hi.  There's a request at Requested moves to move this article from the title Johnny Kidd and the Pirates to Johnny Kidd and The Pirates, capitalizing the t in the.  I checked the page (WP:MUSTARD (?)) where Wikipedia:WikiProject Music keeps their naming conventions, and I read there that there's a convention to prefer titles styled as Johnny Kidd & the Pirates, with an ampersand and a lower-case t.  I wonder if anybody has a strong opinion on whether this convention should be followed in this particular case... -GTBacchus(talk) 06:23, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, well it seems to have been moved to Johnny Kidd & The Pirates.  Seems alright. -GTBacchus(talk) 09:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article title 

message: The article states "Though sometimes dismissed as a novelty act because of this gimmick"... but does anyone really dismiss them? You'd have to be seriously ignorant to do that! DavidFarmbrough (talk) 08:05, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  dismissed as novelty? 

message: Hey. I'm currently working on an article for Joe Moretti who played guitar on The Pirates' Shakin' All Over. Does anyone have any more info about other sessions he played on? In particular "Don't Sleep in the Subway": a track this article claims he played some part in.
Cheers!
Keefaz (talk) 11:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Joe Moretti 
Talk:Cutthroat Island

message: User:Sjones23 revision by 1222654457 by Dusted-9 contains info I originally added like honeytrap that is not relevant. What is relevant is how Shaw ended up a slave and that he escaped during the mutiny also Trotter sides with Morgan's crew — Preceding CSOOCS comment added by CSOOCS (talk • contribs) 23:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, there. While plot summaries are 400 to 700 words per WP:FILMPLOT, do you think Trotter's involvement as well as how Shaw was enslaved are important elements to the article's plot? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 00:35, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Nisha Kothari

message: Æﬃﬆ made this article. This is a finshed project and will be closéd for the time being. Please move to my next project Wikipedia: WikiProject:Nepal
Can you please change the biography section. Comments like "The only reason she has gotten any roles in Bollywood films is because of director, Ram Gopal Varma." seem very biased. - ashish.vashisht  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashish.vashisht (talk • contribs) 11:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Billiards at Half-Past Nine

message: The city in which the novel is never actually named and of the suburbs Kissingen, Doderingen and Denklingen, only the last is easily found on a map (it's part of Reichshof).   I dont remember the #11 tram: is that an actual ride?   Köln does have a romanesque St. Severin church on Severinstraße; does the neigborhood otherwise correspond to the novel's description? Sparafucil (talk) 10:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  locale 
Talk:Whangaparāoa Peninsula

message: I mean, really, "Big Manly Beach"? - finally a beach with some chesthair... Zemlod 06:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OMG I'll never forgive you for that one!  Can't believe I'd never thought of it in that way before (my bach is there) :P -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 00:12, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Big Manly is for posers. I used to live in Little Manly; a town for those that don't need to compensate for anything. :) Edaemus (talk) 07:26, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The Whangaparaoa peninsula is part of the Auckland urban area, at least according to Statistics New Zealand's 2001 definitions. Here is a list of some nearby Area Units they include in the Northern Auckland Zone (one of four parts of Auckland urban area): Red Beach, Waiwera, Hatfields Beach, Orewa, Stanmore Bay, Manly, Army Bay, Gulf Harbour, Silverdale South, Silverdale North, Dairy Flat-Redvale. You can see the boundary online by zooming in on the area, turning on the orange "Urban Areas and Rural Centres" boundary lines, and turning off the blue Area Unit boundaries (which obscure it). There is a 2006 classification, but I don't know if details of this have been publicly released yet. -- Avenue 10:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Part of Auckland 

message: Whangaparaoa is not in Auckland, it is in the Rodney District. Between Auckland and Rodney lies the North Shore district.
Also, if you live in Whangaparaoa, to phone some in Auckland requires a toll call (i.e. it isn't a local call). —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 203.173.158.192 (talk) 04:17, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It depends what you mean by "Auckland". Whangaparaoa is not in Auckland City, or in the Auckland local calling area, but it is in the Auckland Region. It is also counted as part of the Auckland urban area by Statistics New Zealand (along with Orewa and Waiwera), and this is what :Category:Auckland refers to. I think the text is wrong about the ARC defining this; I will track down a source and check. -- Avenue 04:49, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Here's a map of the Auckland Region with the urban area marked: Urban/Rural Profile Maps: Auckland. New Zealand's urban areas were defined by Statistics NZ, back when it was call the Department of Statistics. See New Zealand Standard Areas Classification Manual 1992, Catalogue No.19.035.0092, Department of Statistics 1992. -- Avenue 08:50, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Whangaparaoa is not in Auckland 

message: Which is the correct spelling?
1)  or
2) Whangaparaoa.
Both spellings are in this one article - which is it? (or is it either?)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.100.87.48 (talk) 02:22, August 29, 2007 (UTC) 
  Whangaparaoa is correct. DerbyCountyinNZ 03:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Whangaparaoa'' or ''Whangaparoa''?
Category talk:Canadian TV stations by channel number

message: Maybe it's due to my lack of understanding of how channel numbers are alloted, but, I am thinking that this would become a very huge and unmanageable category given the number of different channels in every area under every cable or satellite company. In my area alone, there are hundreds of channels just on digital cable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NorthernThunder (talk • contribs) 
:These categories seem to only sort local stations by their over-the-air channel numbers (ie. VHF/UHF), so cable/satellite don't really come into play here. I do question the need for these categories though, seeing as Canadian stations rarely identify by their OTA channel numbers (as opposed to their American counterparts). 
:The main reason these categories were implemented for the American stations was to replace the "Lists of channel # TV stations in the US", which in turn were meant to take the load off DAB pages like Channel 2. - Hinto 00:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:York, South Carolina

message: I would love to talk with anyone interested in forming a Wikipedia collaborative project to polish, revise, and extend any and all articles related to York County, South Carolina.  If you are interested, please contact me through my Talk Page.  Cheers! --Chuchunezumi 06:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential Collaborative Project
Talk:Clover, South Carolina

message: I would love to talk with anyone interested in forming a Wikipedia collaborative project to polish, revise, and extend any and all articles related to York County, South Carolina.  If you are interested, please contact me through my Talk Page.  Cheers! --Chuchunezumi 06:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential Collaborative Project
Talk:Marzieh (singer)

message: I have just deleted someone's contribution saying "Go Marzieh!!".
All too often do we find irrelevant and spam-style posts of people's opinions towards the subject. Talk pages are to discuss the article. I urge people to spread this information to new users.
Thank you Sophiaaa.x (talk) 13:42, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Talk Pages Are Not Forums 
Talk:Fort Mill, South Carolina

message: Does Fort Mill really extend into Lancaster County?  I've looked through maps of both counties and I've yet to find any map that shows Fort Mill stretching into Lancaster.  Could someone then verify with a map that Fort Mill has territory in Lancaster County, please?  If no one can, I will then proceed to remove all references to Lancaster in the article. Inkan1969 (talk) 14:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Lancaster County
Talk:Prodigy (online service)/Archive 1

message: Was Prodigy in fact the first graphical dialup online service? I seem to remember from the mid-1980s a service called Quantum Link or QLink that ran on the Commodore 64. This was  graphical online service similar to AOL in some ways, with forums and online games. According to the QLink article, that one was launched in 1985, which would make it prior to Prodigy. -- Smerdis of Tlön 16:05, 15 Oct 2003 (UTC)
replies: text: Depends how you define "graphical." Q-Link ran in text mode almost all the time (I think one or two of the games kicked the 64 into bitmapped mode) and relied on the 64's graphics characters, but it definitely was menu-driven and definitely was more user-friendly than Compu$erve. But Prodigy took it a step further, actually using bitmaps. Definitely a quibble, but there were things Q-Link just couldn't do because of that limitation. Not that it wasn't ambitious. Q-Link's resemblance to AOL isn't a coincidence, BTW--it was the same company. -- Dave Farquhar 03:07, 16 Oct 2003 (UTC)
thread_title: First graphical dialup online service
Talk:Ralph Norman

message: I would love to talk with anyone interested in forming a politically neutral Wikipedia collaborative project to polish, revise, and extend any and all articles related to York County, South Carolina.  If you are interested, please contact me through my Talk Page.  Cheers! --Chuchunezumi 07:20, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential Collaborative Project

message: I'm not sure why someone italicized his birthdate, but I see no reason or precedent for this anywhere.  Unless it is explained, I'm going to revert it.  Please contact me through my talk if you have an objection.  --Chuchunezumi 20:55, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Odd editing

message: Norman's decision to support Trump allies' attempt to overturn the 2020 election results belongs in this article. It is reliably sourced and of long-term encyclopedic value. The IP number that keeps removing has not proved a policy-based reason for excluding the content. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 15:25, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: It’s clearly significant. I’ve added another cite. KJP1 (talk) 08:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  2020 election
Talk:Smyrna, South Carolina

message: I would love to talk with anyone interested in forming a politically neutral Wikipedia collaborative project to polish, revise, and extend any and all articles related to York County, South Carolina.  If you are interested, please contact me through my Talk Page.  Cheers! --Chuchunezumi 07:23, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Potential Collaborative Project
Talk:The Air Force

message: Can someone please post a link to this Onion article on Xiu Xiu's The Air Force?
This seems to be a total load of bullshit. There is no Onion article, neither The Onion nor the AV Club. Also, the tone of this crap is completely and utterly biased, having no place in Wikipedia. "therefore waste the warmonger's money on Xiu Xiu fans who are intelligent and well versed in global politics, capitalism, and empire." Not really a partisan statement such that should be featured in Wikipedia. If this was a direct quote from Jamie, it would be acceptable, but I utterly doubt that this quote was more than some sophomoric attempt to introduce bias to this page. The unverified content should be deleted until someone confirms that The Onion even knows who the hell Xiu Xiu is. Fmalcangi 06:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Onion
Talk:Taraz

message: Why is there a need to specify the Chagatai name of the city in the introduction? Qaramazov 07:44, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Chagatai Name 

message: why have all references to Djamukat been deleted?  This is an important fact.  Moreover I think the article suffers from a general lack of clarity, for example a disscussion of the Russian/Soviet archeology is not essential information for a history section, it belongs in a archeology section.  Also when narrating a timeline explain the importace of the events in their geopolitical context, otherwise to a non-specialist reader it becomes just so many strange names and meaningless dates.  and as always the key to good writing, less is more--Gurdjieff (talk) 15:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  clarity please 

message: In the third paragraph of the "Early references" section under "Medieval Taraz," the articles notes that "from the 1st BC to 5th AD Kangui (Kanglu) tribes lived in the Talas River Valley." Kanglu had linked to the page for Kangar, a town in Malaysia. I considered replacing the link with Kangly, but I wasn't sure that was the same people, so I simply removed the link. If someone can confirm that the Kangly and Kangui (Kanglu) are the same, please add the Kangly link.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by William Rehtworc (talk • contribs) 05:09, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to Kangui (Kanglu) tribes
Talk:The Caravelles

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/the-caravelles-mn0000633144/biography. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 02:00, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:M2 Hyde

message: The current article states that the receiver is manufactured with a steel forging and tubular section. Do we know if the frontal receiver section was forged or produced through metal sintering? Some uncouth sources I am looking at differ in what they say on the matter. 2603:8090:1900:E700:8690:9E52:5402:4312 (talk) 05:22, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production method of receiver
Talk:Airline teletype system

message: It would seem that the article should be named something like IATA message formats or something similar.  Unless I'm missing something, there was no Airline teletype but rather an Airline teletype system.  Vegaswikian 07:50, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: I suspect "torn tape" was the original foundation for airline message switching. This was displaced by schemes such as SITA High Level Network which was perhaps the first deployed packet switching system.Rdmoore6 19:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Technology
Talk:Chalukya–Chola wars

message: There is a blatant bias towards cholas in the voice of the article. Most likely from a Tamil Nadu "scholar". Needs proper peer review. 2405:201:D023:70DE:B993:DF58:6EA9:3579 (talk) 08:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chola Bias in the article 

message: @Onel5969 check this page which lacks behind evidence and sounds like self written propaganda with all the information given by a person with no citations given to it CatTheMeow (talk) 06:23, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion for this page  

message: Just pussing tamil propaganda with false info 103.211.17.111 (talk) 18:34, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  False info
Talk:M2 medium tank

message: No concerns with "The M2 was already obsolete when it entered service" but stating that "...Soviet BT-7, which could easily withstand 37 mm hits" seems very much incorrect. The BT-7M had a maximum of 22mm of armor, and http://gva.freeweb.hu/weapons/usa_guns2.html shows that the M5 could defeat 26mm at 20 degrees slope at 500 yards. With thin side and rear armor the BT-7 should not be included in this sentence, although it was a much better tank. Gltyrebyter (talk) 22:17, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editing required? 

message: My Dad (93, still alive) was Sgt for a M2 Tank w/ Howitzer used in Philippines and Korea 1945-46. We have pictures.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sceptreofjudah (talk • contribs) 05:29, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  M2 Medium Tank (Howitzer) used in Philippines and Korea 1945-46 

message: "and German Panzer III which could withstand 37 mm (1.5 in) anti-tank guns"
The 37mm M3 Cannon could most defiantly penetrate a Pz.III within 500 yards. I will provide sources bellow.
APC M51 Shot (meet angle 30°, homogeneous armor)	53mm at 500 yards (Hunnicutt - Stuart: A History of the American Light Tank, p 496)
Panzer 3 armor Armor	10 mm – 30 mm (additional 30mm plate added later) http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/nazi_germany/Panzer_III.php  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.104.198.186 (talk) 18:57, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inaccuracies in supposed combat performance.
Talk:M22 Locust

message: Notes etc below as usual. EyeSerenetalk 08:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyedit 

message: The article states fairly clearly that the UK only took 260 of the 830 produced. However, a detailed 1950s breakdown of Lend-Lease shipmentsUnited States Army in World War II, statistics - Lend-Lease (1952) reports 420 sent to the UK (strictly "UK and British Empire except Canada"). Any idea what might explain the discrepancy - were 160 notionally assigned to the UK but never left the US? Andrew Gray (talk) 20:20, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Some items sent to the UK never arrived due to shipping losses.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.173.52 (talk) 10:23, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  British numbers? 

message: Surviving Panzers is an unreliable WP:SELFPUB source and cannot be used. Schierbecker (talk) 07:44, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surviving Panzers source
Talk:North Cornwall

message: RE: villages removed from district - I agree that its best to show only the major settlements on the main district page, but a fuller list of villages/places in North Cornwall can easily be accomodated as we have done at Penwith by having a few listed on the main page, and then linking out to an alphabetised List of places in Penwith page.  I'll try and do this for North Cornwall when I have a chance.  Mammal4 08:10, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Only major towns in district

message: The Rumps, on Pentire Point, North Cornwall, site of Iron Age cliff fortifications]]--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 12:09, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: now in the article.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 15:15, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Illustration: The Rumps