lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Two Noble Kinsmen

message: When I , I kept myself to one source per production and cited the articles/reviews I have easy access to. However, I wanted to list a few other reviews that might (1) more directly support the article content than the citation I decided to use, and/or (2) contain new information that would be beneficial to add to the page.
* (review of Royal Shakespeare Company at the Swan Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, 1986; dir. Barry Kyle)
* (review of Royal Shakespeare Company at the Swan Theatre, Stratford-upon-Avon, 2016; dir. Blanche McIntyre)
* (review of Shakespeare's Globe, London, 2018; dir. Barrie Rutter)
Peloneous(t)[c] 00:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further sources for modern productions 

message: This also needs a section on the scholarly consensus regarding the merit of the play -- user:2001:1c00:2a05:3100:115:772f:bfd:96a8
(New post moved from top to bottom)--Nø (talk) 07:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Merit

message: The section "Modern revival" gives a list of recent performances beginning in 2007, e.g.
:A production opened on 9 June 2015 at the White Bear Theatre in Vauxhall, London–the first London production of the play since 2000.
Now, 2000 is hardly pre-modern, so to earn the title of the section, we should say more about a hiatus and the very first performances after that hiatus. (I do not have such info.) Or the section title should be more like "Recent performances".--Nø (talk) 07:51, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: "Modern revival"

message: I feel this page needs more information on the play's authorship debate, given that it raged well into the 20th century, unlike many plays classed as Shakespeare apocrypha. What changed? Did new technology allow deeper analyses that quieted critics' complaints? If not, why is the attribution to Shakespeare now uncontroversial when other 20th-century additions to the canon like Edward III and Sir Thomas More continue to inspire debate? Metz77 (talk) 09:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. There is a lot more that could be said about that and this page is much less detailed than it could be. Are you planning to work on it yourself? There are certainly good sources out there. AndyJones (talk) 12:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Authorship
Talk:Henry VIII (play)

message: John Downes' statement about Lowin and Shakespeare is clearly appropriate for a work of reference, since it appears in a number of such reference works, including the one used here as a source, Halliday's Shakespeare Companion. As long as it's presented as what it is — a report from a specific source, not a fact, but not a subjective POV statement either — it's acceptable. Much of the material we possess on Shakespeare and his contemporaries, as well as historical figures of previous eras, consists of such reported information. If we deleted all such material, we'd have little left. Ugajin 18:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lowin and Downes

message: Shouldn't we have something about the plot ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I second this.  I was just going to ask the same question when I saw this comment.  If not a detailed plot summary, at least a general statement of what period of Henry's life this covers.  DavidRF (talk) 04:38, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot
Talk:Grim's Ditch

message: Can someone please:
* confirm or deny that these are essentially separate structures (possibly made at different times) rather than one, originally continuous, structure
* discuss the origin of the name. There is something in Grim's Ditch (Harrow) but I would not describe its source as authoritative!
-- RHaworth 19:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: wish list

message: The Oxon section seems to break a handful of rules. It's almost a bit of a personal essay which lectures the reader on what to think and how to approach the science. Can it not please be rewritten to keep the good stuff but make it more standards-compliant? Not by me, I hasten to add. 82.34.153.236 (talk) 21:43, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Oxfordshire

message: The article seems to conflate three Grim's Ditches/Banks into two across Oxfordshire and West Berkshire.
As far as I can see there are three totally separate ditches across those two counties:
* Oxfordshire - Grim's Ditch, Mongewell to Nettlebed. eg https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1006368
* Oxfordshire/West Berkshire boundary - Grim's Ditch, Ardington to Chilton, partly forming the county boundary, and looks like a continuation of the first one? eg https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1004825
* West Berkshire - Grim's Bank, Little Heath to Ufton Nervet, totally separate from the first two. eg https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1005375
The article lists the first two of those as "Oxfordshire" and "West Berkshire", and doesn't mention the third.
Everyone happy if I rearrange the article to include all three of those? Edbrims (talk) 14:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Oxfordshire / West Berkshire
Talk:Harry Warner

message: Can anyone prove this claim? Koalorka (talk) 04:42, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewish ancestry?
Talk:Albert Warner

message: "The family moved to Ohio and as a young man, along with his two brothers..."
His two brothers?  But it just said he had three brothers!  Who got left behind?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.71.164.107 (talk) 09:46, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many? 

message: Wow Benjamin "Warner" really had a lot of kids, didn't he? Yo it's me duh (talk) 08:34, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dad's many kids 
Talk:Sam Warner

message: This article has improved significantly, but it needs more inline citations, especially in the "Legacy" section. -- twelsht (talk) 00:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "thomas11" :
** 
** Thomas (1990), p. 11.
* "thomas38" :
** Thomas (1990), p. 38.
** Thomas (1990), pp. 38.
* "HBTHYNA115" :
** Sperling, Millner, and Warner (1998), p. 163.
** Sperling, Millner, and Warner (1998), p. 115.
DumZiBoT (talk) 14:43, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report : Found duplicate references ! 
Talk:Minister for Women and Equalities

message: Joan Ruddock and Baroness Jay were Ministers for Women in the late a990s. I don't know exact dates though...
When this post was first introduced in 1997, it was an unpaid role. Catchpole 11:05, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've no problem with you reverting the edit and I'm glad you've pretty much understood the issue here. Must take you up on one issue though - women may have suffered great inequality in the past, but I'm not so sure you can say that so confidently today. Also, if you look specifically at discrimination and thus inequality directly caused by government you'll find the majority of gender discrimination (and attempted discrimination) is against men - e.g. pensions, family law, domestic violence all areas which have specific and clearly stated gender discrimination against men - the like of which women have seen in years. Also health care provision, (especially cancer) shows pretty clear gender discrimination. Inequality and discrimination isn't just about how much money someone has.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shakehandsman (talk • contribs) 13:45, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

message: There must be something about the doublethink and sexism etc about this role. Especially considering it was created under Loony Labour. --Kurtle (talk) 21:57, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  No Controversies? 

message: From its title ("Minister for Women and Equalities") it is not clear that this refers to UK only. I suggest that the title be changed to "Minister for Women and Equalities (UK)" Reilinger (talk) 08:57, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK specific 

message: The position has not changed from Minister for Women and Equalities to Minster for Women.
If you look on the UK government website you will see that Nicky Morgan is Minister for Women and Equalities: https://www.gov.uk/government/ministers/minister-for-women-and-equalities--3
Also various news outlets are discussing the irony of an opponent of same-sex marriage being equalities minster: 
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/jul/15/equalities-minister-voted-against-gay-marriage-nicky-morgan
Lastly, the BBC in this link, when you click on your face states this: "She will also continue as minister for women and equalities."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-19475248
I have never edited a wiki page so would rather leave to someone who has.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.147.130.39 (talk) 19:05, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The position is minister for women and equalities not Minister for Women  

message: In "...Government Equalities Office, an independent department within..." what is the word "independent" doing there?  It seems that "independent" is a word to be scattered about all over the place. 31.52.251.151 (talk) 11:04, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Independent?
Talk:Ghetaldi

message: If any person have more info about the genealogical Ghetaldi members and alternative branches please added or contact abogado_dechile@hotmail.com, Ragusino  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragusino (talk • contribs) 01:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DATES - PLACE OF THE GETALDIĆ MISSED
Talk:Samsas Traum

message: In my Opinion Samsas Traum isnt realy a Black Metal Band. --213.54.178.124 19:28, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: but ... it was meant as a black (as in goth) "metal opera", not as a "black metal" opera...
agreed --172.174.218.209 11:13, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

text: there's a massive discussion in German Wikipedia about which style Samsas Traum is. Just leave it like it is. "Die Liebe Gottes" and "Heiliges Herz" contain Black Metal voices and topics and that should be enough. It's not a true Norwegian Black Metal band, but it doesn't need to, does ist? - 88.217.41.247 (talk) 00:15, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you can't put them in one genre, they change their style from album to album ...--87.178.223.202 (talk) 18:49, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Samsas Traum is mostly Dark Metal afaik. A lot of websites say Samsas Traum is Black- or Gothic Metal. Dark Metal is some kind of mix, german wikipedia says it's dark metal too. Neue Deutsche Härte is embarrassing, Rammstein would be Neue Deutsche Härte. In Last.fm Samsas Traum is tagged as Gothic, Gothic Metal, Darkwave, Black Metal and Avantgarde. 79.201.245.158 (talk) 15:27, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Alexandr Solzhenitsyn bibliography/to do

message: *BONUS POINTS: Add Cyrillic versions of the original titles alongside the romanized ones
*Check for duplicate entries
*Should we continue to list multiple editions of the same work separately? Takes up a lot of space and is perhaps a bit confusing
*Reevaluate the categorizations?
*Convert all references to use the standard citation templates. In progress...
**Books - done
**Editions and Collections - done
**Editions in English - done
**Uncollected Periodical Publications - done
**Other Works - done
**Bibliographies - 50%
**Biographies - done
**References - 90%, see inline comments
*Update the English publications section - it is by no means complete, as the "translated as" references in the main section shows. All of the "translated as" references have been moved over. Russia in Collapse has been added, since it was published just a few weeks ago
::Some titles that I know are missing from this list: Russia In Collapse August 1914 These have been added.
*Regularize formatting - is there a standard bibliography format (or even a template) that Wikipedia uses? Yes: see Wikipedia:Template_messages/Sources_of_articles/Generic_citations
*Sort by: title? author? publication date? (I think publication date is the best for a bibliography) Seems that for the most part things are already sorted by year they were published.
*Is the ` symbol a necessary part of romanized Russian titles? Yes, it seems to be
*Do we need to keep the [bilingual edition] note that is on some entries? We'll put it in the "format" argument in the template
Last updated: --RockRockOn 17:37, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Current status / to-do
Talk:Michael Crescenz

message: This is a Medal of Honor Recepient.  It may need to be cleaned up but should not be deleted in my opinion. DIPics 19:29, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 18:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008
Talk:Túró Rudi

message: I have corrected the spelling of rúd (accent at u, initial /this isn't german, after all/), corrected the conversion between forint and euro cent. Today I were in a shop, the lesser one is 59 forint, the óriás version is 95, so I think 60 and 100 is good in this article.
Also, I remember something about Túró Rudi in Wikipedia, but that wasn't this article... Somebody knows something about it?
P.S.: That thing in the history that rúd is penis in slang, is simply hilarious :D never heard somebody calling a dick rúd (bar)... Frigo 19:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Rack-O

message: I removed a PROD put here by an IP.  My reason: Racko! is a game produced by Parker Brothers and distributed widely (and I think it's still being sold, which makes it a long run, too)... there's no reason to think this is non-notable, and I see no reason not to get into the details of the rules in the article either.  In any case, if someone still feels this is non-notable, it should go to WP:AFD not PROD.  Mangojuicetalk 19:31, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

message: Why is the title Racko! when the game is called Rack-o? ColinClark (talk) 06:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: It looks like just an oversight by the topic creator that was never corrected. — CobraWiki ( jabber | stuff ) 22:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Mike Quarry

message: This is a good start to the article. Thanks for those who set it up. Capitalistroadster 19:32, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From the Long Beach Press-Telegram: ]. BlankVerse 08:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Newspaper article on Mike Quarry
Talk:Eric Carter (BMX rider)

message: The box on the right says:
Weight 	79.38kg (175 lbs. Imperial)
This looks like somebody simply converted 175lb into kg and put in the result, but the weight given in kg is ridiculously over-precise... I'm sure we don't know his weight to the nearest 10g, it would fluctuate by more than that over a snack. I'd round it down to 79kg, except that the body of the article says:
Height & weight at height of career (1990): Ht:5'10" Wt:~175-180lbs.
So, maybe it should be given in both places as 175-180lb (79.4-81.6kg) or something like that. While I personally use the metric system, it seems from the numbers given that the weight in pounds is the original data and the other is just a conversion to give some idea of the weight to people who use the metric system, so I think the weight in kilograms should be the one parenthesised. Is there a policy on this? Angelastic 08:26, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight 
Talk:Russian River (Alaska)

message: Posting here in the probably vain hope that this person will engage instead of just doing it again: I have twice now removed the supposed Russian translation of the name of this river. The reason is simple: there is no evidence that the name is from the Russian America period, having first been reported in 1904 according to the GNIS source used in the article. It is therefore irrelevant. (I also find it highly unlikely that the Russians themselves would've named it "Russian River" and personally always suspected it was kind of a lame joke about the "rushing" current but I don't have a source to back that up) Beeblebrox (talk) 02:50, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  slow-mo edit war over name in Russian
Talk:Granger causality

message: I just wanted to add the original paper here:
Granger, C.W.J., 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods.
Econometrica 37 (3), 424– 438.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.143.180.152 (talk) 20:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

message: Because it makes reference to an index "p" that does not appear in the formulae.
Moscholar (talk) 08:56, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  mathematical section is flawed 

message: On 4/21/2023 Wikivdt deleted a reference and a brief (two-sentence) discussion of a paper by Grassmann et al challenging the validity of Granger's methodology:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Granger_causality&diff=1150523783&oldid=1122114761
I don't know whether Grassmann's criticism is valid, but her paper was published in a respected journal, and it seems pertinent to this article. Is there a good reason that the material was deleted? Should it be restored?  NCdave (talk) 13:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing no objection, I'm going to revert the deletion, but tone down the criticism. NCdave (talk) 22:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of reference and discussion of Grassmann (2020)
Talk:Dieter Stein

message: What others allege is relevant. Just because the Junge Freiheit claims to be liberal doesn't make it so. Some people analyse the content (which is what's important, by the way) to be right-wing (which even the Verfassungsschutz once did) to right-conservatives, others don't, that's what this relative clause is trying to clarify.--CarabinieriTTaallkk 19:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aasiaat

message: The Danish page on Aasiaat https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aasiaat has a different coat of arms, which one is correct?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.225.98.203 (talk) 13:28, 16 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither. Aasiaat was subsumed into Qaasuitsup in 2009 and at this point lost the spiderweb arms, instead adopting the arms depicted on the Danish page (with the sled dogs, sled, mountains, and sun, moon, and snowflake). However, this year Qaasuitsup was split in two, and the part containing Aasiaat became Qeqertalik, which has new arms -- a map depicting the region. Honestly, I think each change is a reduction in heraldic quality, but that opinion has no bearing on the encyclopedic reality that should be accurately reported by all language versions of Wikipedia. Arlo James Barnes 00:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: coat of arms?
Talk:William Chapman Ralston

message: me and my friends always thought mr. ralston was murdered. not by just anyone, it was his wife. there is rumor that mr. ralston got locked in the attic by his wife while he cleaned it out. that might be why the attic is off limits at the mansion to this day. maybe, the whole story about him drowning is all just rubish. because one day when somebody was talking about how i think he died they saw the ghost of mrs. ralston, and she didn't look pleased with what they were talking about. not pleased at all.
:Unless a reliable source can be found and cited, that will remain a rumor. Unsubstantiated rumors are not allowed in biographies. Ronbo76 17:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: death/murder
Talk:Castle (disambiguation)

message: Castle can also reffer to the "Castle type" network introduced by Windows Vista --Pinnecco 20:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

message: The Castle (film) directs to an Australian film, but there is also another by Michael Haneke (titled "Das Scloß", but anglicised as "The Castle"). How should these two films be disambiguated or delineated? Cormaggio is learning 16:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Two films "The Castle"

message: I've put in a speedy rename request to change to "Castle (disambiguation)" as it is the least common denominator. This article covers: Castle, Castles, The Castle, The Castles, A Castle, etc.. -- Stbalbach 15:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Page moved, per request.  Cheers. -GTBacchus(talk) 23:31, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename request
Talk:Afognak

message: There are at least three Afognaks now: Afognak the island, Afognak, Alaska, the former village located on the island, and Native Village of Afognak, the federally recognized tribe of Alutiiqs descended from the inhabitants of Afognak.  It seems wise to me to change this page's name (i.e., to move it) to "Afognak Island" and use the page called Afognak as a disambiguation page pointing to the three (so far) Afognak-related pages. I'm seeking consensus if there are other editors for whom this is an issue, pro or con. Thanks. --Yksin 21:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Typical Wikipedia practice in this situation is to put the most general article under the primary name, and then write a disambiguation page. I'll write that now. -Harmil 02:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, that works great. Good to know the best practice in this regard. --Yksin 16:16, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation? 
Talk:Free Cities (A Song of Ice and Fire)

message: Created this article to cover an area of the books that is detailed and important enought to the plot and general encyclopedic knowledge of the world to rate its own page. I'm planning on later adding "Notable Characters from "City X" to appear in the books for Illyrio, Syrio, Varys, etc. I didn't think that (as of yet) there is anything in the article to warrant a spoiler tag but I'm not opposed to it if others disagree. As always any refinments or additions would be most welcome. NeoFreak 20:20, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

message: A person or thing from Qohor is "Qohorik". Are we sure the plural is "Qohori"?Captain Crawdad 16:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Qohori/Qohorik

message: I've sort of partially reverted some deletions that were made here because I don't see why some of the deleted details didn't belong here. Was there a particular reason I'm missing? Also, in regards to Tyrosh being "infamous for its avarice", it's noted in the Concordance at westeros.org here: http://www.westeros.org/Citadel/Concordance/Concordance12a.html#12.2.7. though I haven't checked to see if the line is just the POV of a character or not. -Captain Crawdad 20:27, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Restored Details

message: On p691 in my copy of A Feast for Crows, Taaena's lover is described as a man with a scar and dark hair, about as much description as was given to the Alchemist in the prologue.  Any thoughts on a connection to Jaqen H'ghar? Chris02:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Taena Merryweather 

message: Why isn't this article at just "Free Cities"?  No one else is using the title.. shouldn't we avoid the parenthetical article titles when possible? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 138.69.160.1 (talk) 19:55, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Title 

message: ""valar dohaeris, the meaning of which is "all men must serve."
Can anyone find some evidence for this? I believe the author stated he would reveal the meaning in his upcoming book, so this is simple speculation. And not even the mainstream speculation (That the meaning is "But first they must live")Connington (talk) 02:24, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valar Dohaeris 

message: Proposing to merge this and Ghis back into Across the narrow sea, as I don't see a reason for a separate article based on notability guidelines. Yoenit (talk) 14:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge now done (content as transwikied). Yoenit (talk) 11:39, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposing merge into [[Across the narrow sea]]