lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Feedback vertex set

message: Why does this have its own Wiki article?  Is there some other article this can be merged to? I just don't see how this concept warrants an article. Torc2 (talk) 23:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: scholar.google.com lists 908 scientific articles mentioning Feedback Vertex Set; 88 have it in their title. It would be easy to fill a whole book with the results. So in my opinion, this concepts does warrant an article. --Mellum (talk) 23:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK, I was just legitimately curious - I didn't tag it or nominate it for deletion.  It'd be nice to flesh out the section on uses for the function. Torc2 (talk) 23:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability?

message: I have removed the following sentence from the main article:
::In contrast, the problem is polynomial-time solvable on graphs of maximum degree at most three.
This statement was initially sourced , but is not supported by that reference. Hermel (talk) 19:35, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Statement removed from main article

message: The article keeps saying that the optimization version (MINIMUM FVS) is NP-complete.  It is not.  It is NP-hard.  It is the decision problem that is NP-complete.
This is probably happening in other articles as well. 68.5.117.23 (talk) 01:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NP-hard vs NP-complete
Talk:Digital camera modes

message: Comments on my reasons for creating this article.
First, I've inadvertently named it List of digital camera formats; I'm hoping (and request) that somebody will rename it List of digital camera modes, as this is something I've not done in Wikipedia.
Digital camera modes are often not documented in detail in manuals, so you don't know exactly what's happening with shutter, focussing, etc. As far as I know there's no comprehensive resource that gives this information. I'm hoping that this list will become an increasingly comprehensive list of detailed camera information. Entries something like (examples obviously made up!):
Portrait mode:
* Generally uses widest aperture possible for the light conditions, 100ASA sensitivity, often recognises and autofocusses on a face if less than 4m from camera, white balance daylight, will not use fill-in flash under bright conditions.
** Nikon 10000E to 12123F use f/2.8, spot exposure metering
*** 10000AE additionally dangles a toy bird above camera to get babies to smile
** Canon ABC1 uses center-weighted metering
Pol098 (talk) 23:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reasons 

message: Aperture priority mode and shutter priority mode have their own articles, but manual mode and program mode do not. Should manual and program modes have their own articles, or should the articles for aperture priority mode and shutter priority be deleted? --The High Fin Sperm Whale (talk) 17:47, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New articles or delete old? 

message: I have been trying to understand what back button focus is, having heard a couple of Canon photographers rave about it. I am not sure I entirely understand what it does, but what I'd really like to know is this: What is it called in the lingo of other camera manufacturers, like Sony? Do they call it "back button focus" too, or do they have an entirely different name for it? Or maybe they don't have it in their cameras at all?
I did try the manual, but it's hard to find something if you have no idea what they call it or if they have it.
Thanks! --87.150.10.237 (talk) 15:50, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Footnote 7 in the "Back button focus" section of the article takes you to a magazine source that explains it in further detail. In short, a button on the back of camera that you press to activate auto focus. DonFB (talk) 17:44, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Digital_camera_modes#Back_button_focus|Back Button Focus]]
Talk:Ed

message: I suspect that ED can also stand for Electrical Distribution. 
See the section titled "Leviton (Mexico) S. de R.L. de C.V" on this web page:
http://www.leviton.com/OA_HTML/ibeCCtpSctDspRte.jsp?section=15462&minisite=10026
71.117.209.73 (talk) 23:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Electrical 

message: "Ending song for an anime" - Ehrm, maybe that one could at least be extended with one two words, telling WHAT anime it is an ending song for?.. 85.229.218.99 (talk) 16:18, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unspecific entry
Talk:List of local education agency districts in Michigan

message: This list mixed public school districts, or Local Education Agency (LEA) districts in state jargon, with individual institutions, some of which may be charter school districts, or Public School Academy (PSA) districts. The list should at the very least distinguish between these very different types of districts. I intend to update the list by first removing entries that are not LEA districts. Entries removed from the list will be placed here until it can be determined what to do with them. There may need to be supplemental lists identifying PSA districts and Intermediate school districts. I'd also like to eventually transform the presentation to a sortable table format with columns for city/county and perhaps the range of grades served. To identify the type of district, I am using resources available at the Center for Educational Performance and Information older ≠ wiser 13:05, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Temporary holding during cleanup
Talk:V Corps (Union Army)

message: I've been studying this War for decades, but mostly on the Southern side. I'd like compliment the editor(s) who wrote the 1864 section on the reorganization of the Corps. It answers questions I've had for a long time! Kudos! 155.213.224.59 (talk) 15:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  1864 Section
Talk:Jewish medical ethics

message: Few ideas:
* Sources cited, need backstory of 19th century and maybe earlier? Halperin helpful for Israel, need Europe.
* Expand key issues, summary style descriptions of key topics. Describe controversies internal to the field
* See Also for related topics and Jewish law/ethics principles.
* Recent trends in Jewish bioethics, expand
* Maybe address here certain overarching issues common to medical ethics, such as Jewish view of patient autonomy, confidentiality, professional role ethics, beneficence, etc. 
Of course, need help w/categ's, WProjs, tags, etc. Thanks. HG | Talk 23:24, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements 

message: Howdy,  I just stumbled on this article.  It is super important but seems woefully neglected and needs better structure.  Dividing things into sections and the like would help a lot.  If someone who knows more about this topic would like to clean things up that would be great, if not I'll give it a go.  Joe407 (talk) 11:37, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up needed
Template talk:Electric Light Orchestra

message: 
Reason: A Box of their Best is missing from this template. --What about a squirrel? (talk) 23:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: There are no sources stating that the album is officially called Eldorado, A Symphony and not just Eldorado. The band itself called the album simply as Eldorado . The subtitle does not have to be added when naming the article. Douglasr007 (talk) 22:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute
Talk:Fear (disambiguation)

message: The article fear seemed to have an unusually large number of disambiguation links...
... so I combined them. --Jcbutler (talk) 19:10, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirecting Fear of the unknown to Fear was not helpful. I agree with its recent reversion to Fear of the Unknown (capitalisation) with a hatnote to another media article. – Fayenatic (talk) 21:33, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Ask

message: What are the advantages of organic farming  Farming guru (talk) 07:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advantages of organic farming 

message: I'm starting to write a book about people with mental illnesses and from their point of view and their struggles on a daily basis. One because I'm one of those people and to you don't really see a whole lot of books and their perspectives because half the time people think they're just kidding about their their issues. I'm curious to know or get some feedback on what I should write about or if I should write about my struggles or in my life but not my whole life or just to the comments or whatever would help keep the idea going. I struggle myself but I don't have a positive turn out or Outlook yet so that's where I'm confused with writing about my life and struggles but if anyone could help I would love to know Sheimpnoodle (talk) 15:46, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing on mental illness
Talk:Nam

message: Suh Nam Pyo and Moon Nam Sook:
Their first name is not "Nam", but "Nam Pyo" and "Nam Sook". So, Their first name would be "Nam Pyo" and "Nam Sook" and Last name would be "Suh" and "Moon"
Kim Ki Nam and Myung Jae Nam
Their last name is Kim and Myung respectively. --hnc197 (talk) 14:31, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: errors
Talk:Sum

message: This usage of  , a redirect, is under dispute, however it is mostly proceeding in the edit summaries of "sum". -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 09:02, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Further discussion is occurring at talk:summation -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 10:56, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: "{{noredirect|Sum}}"

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sum. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  65.94.40.137 (talk) 11:26, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sum listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Tropical Storm Ingrid (2007)

message: With the long debate by Hmwith, he decided in the end to cut-and-paste...is there any way the histories can be merged? (Same with Jerry and Melissa once they get moved) CrazyC83 (talk) 23:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging histories? 

message: I'd like some info from StormCarib to be included (link). While it may not be official, it still provides some impact, which is not currently mentioned. --Hurricanehink (talk) 23:57, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I added that. Juliancolton (talk) 01:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When adding information, please make sure it flows with the article. --Hurricanehink (talk) 01:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I just wanted to add that in, and then make it better once I found more info. Juliancolton (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

text: No. The lede is very awkward, and there are multiple typos. Please learn to more coherently, and try and spell-check your work ;) --Hurricanehink (talk) 05:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I copy it, and then paste it on a spell checker on word perfect. It showed no mistakes. I will check again. Juliancolton (talk) 14:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And just so I can learn better: what makes the lede awkward? Juliancolton (talk) 14:13, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Calling depressions by their numbers, saying that a tropical wave intensified into a tropical depression, phrases like on the 13. The whole becoming a depression first but storm later could be clearer. --Hurricanehink (talk) 19:28, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any better? Juliancolton (talk) 19:32, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: GAC? Juliancolton (talk) 14:37, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No. Please copyedit it. I counted several spelling and grammar errors. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:24, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Got it. Juliancolton (talk) 16:48, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: :GA review (see here for criteria)
#It is reasonably well written.
#:a (prose):  See above  b (MoS):  See above notes.
#It is factually accurate and verifiable.
#:a (references):  b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):   
#It is broad in its coverage.
#:a (major aspects):  b (focused): 
#It follows the neutral point of view policy.
#:a (fair representation):  b (all significant views): 
#It is stable.
#:
#It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
#:a (tagged and captioned):  b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales): 
#Overall: 
#:a Pass/Fail: 
Article's lead was consulted on IRC, User:Juliancolton fixed it. Thanks to him and CrazyC83, this article meets all criteria.Mitch32contribs 21:36, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Good article review
Talk:Otto W. Geist

message: The text notes that Geist died from parasites, possibly from uncooked bear meat (reference: Dale Guthrie). However, http://www.gavagai.de/philosoph/hhp64.htm, a German biography page, gives the cause of death (which happened in Munich, Germany) as cancer.--Death Bredon (talk) 20:26, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause of death?
Talk:David Smith (hammer thrower, born 1974)

message: The article page [David W. Smith] redirects directly to Fetal alcohol syndrome. However, since Smith has done more than FAS (e.g. Marshall-Smith syndrome) current redirect does not do him right, as far as I am concerned.  Ocetno (talk) 23:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: David W. Smith
Talk:Manchester High School (Virginia)

message: He is by far a lot more notable than all of the alumni combined. In fact, Chris beats them by search results all combined together. Per WP:REDACTION, it makes no sense for his name to not be mentioned. It doesn't make sense if he's a "target" of harassment, because people who are solely notable for it like Brianna Wu and Zoe Quinn (their games are only notable due to them being targets, so as chris for his comic) are not censored. I think it is ridiculous that he is not mentioned. Even google autofills his name when you look up the high school. 2600:6C51:7B7E:D9DB:D9C9:535C:45C6:FABE (talk) 00:33, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No article, no listing. Simple as that. Primefac (talk) 08:13, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Primefac OK but he is banned from having an article. he is still notable in this context nonetheless. 108.82.130.140 (talk) 00:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: No, but I have yet to see an article, draft, or sandbox page that isn't an attack, because the only people who want to write about her are the people who want to poke fun at her. Primefac (talk) 06:39, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

text: chris is banned from being mentioned on wikipedia, as weird as it is 78.18.57.218 (talk) 23:07, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't Chris mentioned?
Talk:Wanted (manga)

message: Since the discussion above actually started long before it was tagged for notability issues, this is an official discussion on whether the article should be redirected to Matsuri Hino's article, as it fails WP:BK and WP:N. This far, only two reviews have been found for the series, on at Comic Book Bin and one Teen Reads. It has not been reviewed by AoD nor ANN, nor any other reliable source that I can find. That is not enough to meet the notability guidelines, and should be redirected. Thoughts? -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 05:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: We've seen how you "merged" Akane-chan Overdrive, so in light of that I'd be quite opposed. 159.182.1.4 (talk) 13:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm...IP socks? -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 14:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Searching the German title Pirat gesucht!, I quickly finds this AnimePro review (they're the German equivalent of ANN). More I hope later. But that puts us to three reviews right there, which means it looks notable to me. —Quasirandom (talk) 13:49, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Ah, Animanga.de has also noticed it, and I had thought they were reliable, but the site seems to have been blacklisted, preventing me from linking it or the machine translation. Huh. —Quasirandom (talk) 13:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Oh, and for another English review, it was reviewed by Otaku USA (text not online), which makes it three just in English. Notability now clearly established, oppose merge. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:54, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

text: Pop Culture Shock short Review Mania Review Comics Village Review Copy-paste from the WT:Anime ;) --KrebMarkt 16:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

text: That would be a no. Article will not be merged (at least, at this time). —Quasirandom (talk) 14:22, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Oakleigh Historic Complex (Mobile, Alabama)

message: I am reassessing the article, which I am the original creator of, as start class.  Much of the history as it now appears seems to be a copy/paste from the Historic Mobile Preservation Society website by User:Msrtrois (revision history), and being a copy/paste clearly violates copyright. I intend to rework the information and find additional sources in the near future.  Altairisfar 18:36, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Completed some of the revisions, copyright issues should now be resolved.  Still needs additional references, preferably published.  Altairisfar 20:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current issues
Talk:CAID

message: ----
"Caid" redirects to "CAID", and states the following:
  Not to be confused with Qaid.
  
  Caid may refer to:
  * Caid (government) (also qaid), a type of governorship found in North Africa and Moorish Spain
Clearly there's an inconsistency here, where it says not to be confused with 'Qaid' but then says '(also qaid)' -- thoughts, suggestions?  Or is it in fact consistent because of the capitalization?  Does anyone know?
Thanks.
SilentAshes (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

message: This links to an article deleted as "not notable". While I believe the subject to be notable, the deleted article would need a rewrite and sourcing. Anyone wanting a copy of this to work on off line can request a copy via my email.   Dlohcierekim  15:51, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Chronic Airway-Digestive Inflammatory Disease (CAID)]]
Talk:LIU Global

message: :Global College→ LIU Global – Relisted. Favonian (talk) 17:45, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: I recently called the LIU registrar and they said LIU global no longer exists. 71.84.117.108 (talk) 15:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  LIU Global may be closed?
Talk:Peterborough College

message: Angela Joyce is no longer the college principal. Terry Jones is the new college principal
Source: http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/news/business/raf-topgun-and-red-arrows-trainer-selected-to-help-peterborough-regional-college-reach-new-heights-1-6702459
Prcmarketing (talk) 15:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Already done Altamel (talk) 19:27, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: New section
Talk:HRS antenna

message: What do the letters HRS stand for?  Jim.henderson (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alphabet soup

message: Is there any relevant WikiProject that can save this article? It needs a thorough copy-edit and cleanup.
20.133.0.13 (talk) 14:42, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This article was atrocious - I've just taken a bash at making it a bit less so! Steve Hosgood (talk) 15:26, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is atrocious 

message: The article Curtain array covers the same type of antenna; I don't see why there are two articles.  And Curtain array covers it much better, explaining the antenna in plain English.  I suggest merging this article into Curtain array. --ChetvornoTALK 04:46, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not saying that "all curtains are HRS arrays".  I'm saying that the HRS, Sterba, and several others are specific types of curtain array, as you admit above, and so could be covered in that article.   Virtually all the content of this article is duplicated in Curtain array.  Unless there is too much material for a single article, which there isn't, much redundancy can be avoided by describing these antennas in Curtain array.    BTW, there are many online sources on these antennas better than the ARRL handbook. --ChetvornoTALK 23:03, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed and  Klbrain (talk) 21:43, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Many thanks.  The "HRS" shorthand nomenclature CCIR standardized is used with all types of curtain arrays, so I feel the merger is appropriate. --ChetvornoTALK 07:16, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge article into [[Curtain array]]? 
Talk:Clem Tholet

message: Hang on added because much more info is to be written.  This is a work in progress.Sf46 (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hang on added 
Talk:Frankie Pierre

message: Could people please stop changing this?  The actress' stage name is Syan Blake, this is what the BBC credited her with, therefore the article is correct to reflect this.--5 albert square (talk) 22:31, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Syan to Sian 
Talk:Sodom and Gomorrah (1922 film)

message: UMMMMM! HOWW MANY HORSES ARE THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!! me and my family were having a contest How many horses were used in the film? but now we cant find the awnswer ? please tell us if you know?? thank you very much!!!!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.33.0.134 (talk) 15:24, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tropical Storm Jerry (2007)

message: I guess there isn't a whole lot of information out there to expand with.  I gave it start class, even though I think it can reach B. ---CWY2190TC 00:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo/Class

message: Looking more at it, I realise that is is extremely short, and contains northing other than a 2-paragraph storm history. Do we really need an article for a storm that lasted 48 hours and didn't even stir up the water? Juliancolton (St. Patrick's day) 00:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yea, I don't know how this slipped by, but I think it should be merged. --Hurricanehink (talk) 04:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Same here, Cyclonebiskit (talk) 05:03, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Really needed?
Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion/User/Archive/Topical index

message: For some of these I understand the logic of making this page. However, it can certainly give the wrong impression about certain types. It may be logical to group them by topic like this, but for many of them, the topic/type itself wasn't problematic, but might have several listings. -- Ned Scott 05:23, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  topic confusion 

message: It is somewhat offensive to LGBT people to have "sexuality or gender identification" classified under "lifestyle". I would be bold and just move it to "Demographic information", but I'm not sure if there are automatic processes involved here that might break. - htonl (talk) 14:45, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 16:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classifying "sexuality or gender identification" under "lifestyle"?
Talk:Community Broadband Bill

message: I enjoyed reading your article!
I liked that you linked the Major organizations included in the Community Broadband Coalition letter in support of The Community Broadband Act section to articles in Wikiepedia. This gives readers the opputunity to click on the links that they are unfamiliar with to learn more. Great Job! Sfofana (talk) 21:22, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Suggestions
Talk:Nissan VR engine

message: I went to the Chicago Auto Show and looked at the VCL of one of the 2016 Q50s on display there.  To my utter lack of surprise, the full designation of the VR30 is VR30DDTT.  Should I upload the pic I took as proof? Carguy1701 (talk) 03:07, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  VR30 full designation 

message: Is it worth it to mention the Eau Rouge?  Seeing as the car may not ever be built, it seems excessive to mention that its in the prototype. Carguy1701 (talk) 03:54, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question