lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Hexamine fuel tablet

message: Two of the external links are broken  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.205.119.147 (talk) 09:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Come on, folks. Lets get some concensus here instead of this ping-pong game. Any German speakers here? --Roly (talk) 20:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I've kept returning it to "im" because that was the first time someone gave a reason for it being one way or the other. Now looking at the history, I see it was originally written "in", which then remained until a change identified as 'typo of german "in should be im"'. Since then, it has been changed back to "in" various times with no reason or with no more definitive basis than that. I couldn't find it on the company's website, and Google Translate doesn't seem to disprove either way. I 'ed it. We actually need a citeable source, since it's a claimed fact of an actual name that is "whatever the company decided to call it", not just a native speaker to tell us what is now linguistically correct. DMacks (talk) 21:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure but I'm leaning towards "in". I've found a few references in German web sites, including German Wikipedia, which say "in" but none that say "im". The only references I can find that say "im" are English Wikipedia and a few unreliable sources that are probably quoting Wikipedia. I have not yet found a reliable citeable source. --Roly (talk) 10:08, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  in or im?
Talk:Lost Battalion

message: If this battalion was isolated then both the French and the american troops fell back.--Tresckow 02:40, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There must be two "lost battalions", because the short excerpt explaining the article discusses World War II and the article itself concerns World War I.  I recall the movie about the WWI "Lost Battalion" but was directed to this article from the article on the 442nd Nisei division.
I am not familiar with Wikipedia functionality, so if the next person who reads this comment could mark this article for revision/clarification I would be grateful.  Thank you.70.23.96.221 02:23, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there is one in each war, I am suggesting a split. Chris 06:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article is inconsistent
Talk:Early Netherlandish painting

message: "Erwin Panofsky preferred the term ars nova ("new art"), which linked the movement with innovative composers of music such as Guillaume Dufay and Gilles Binchois, who were favoured by the Burgundian court over artists attached to the lavish French court.[6]" 
I under fully recognize that this is cited but I'm not sure how it could make sense. The ars nova style was active from 1310–1377 or the 14th century by the narrowest and broadest definitions respectively. Du Fay and Binchois were both composers of the 15th century, after ars nova and Ars subtilior and at the beginning of the Renaissance (Renaissance music begins around the 1400s). If all that is needed here are important ars nova composers then Guillaume de Machaut is by far the most prominent, followed by Philippe de Vitry. Aza24 (talk) 23:51, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: He seems to have got his dates wrong, unless the period covered by the term extended later in his day - nearly a century ago now. Maybe point the discrepancy out in a note, or just drop the point. Like some other Panofsky neolgilistic terms, it has not caught on at all. One notices that the music chosen in historical films and documentaries are more often than not similarly out of joint.  Johnbod (talk) 03:25, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the source and read the excerpt. He says that the term "ars nova" was originated to "glofigy the two great composers Du Fay and Binchois" – which is just... wrong? The term was coined in the 1300s for the music of the 1300s (in the broadest terms) by Philippe de Vitry and to a lesser extent Johannes de Muris, who both lived before Du Fay and Binchois... Aza24 (talk) 09:17, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ars nova? 

message: Shouldn't the filesizes be reduced? Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 16:37, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Lotje, its worth rasisng but a matter of taste; I wouldn't be in favour of reducing myself. Its a very long article out of necessity, and I think the text to image ratio requirement is met. Plus, the pics are lovely. Ceoil (talk) 02:32, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  thanks for coming back on this. Indeed, the pics are lovely. I was only thinking to have them for example upright 1.20 or 1.35. My concern is only for readers on smaller devices . Lotje (talk) 03:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fair point. But on my old laptop that has only 50gb its not onerous. ps, some reductions wouldn't be the end of the world, and I do like to abide by accessibility, and was generally supportive of the much missed User:RexxS. Will be travelling for the next week, but will have a stab shortly. Ceoil (talk) 05:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for looking into this. btw, why is  not here anymore Lotje (talk) 13:40, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Lotje, we all miss RexxS. Anyhow, have done some resizing. Ceoil (talk) 01:17, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sizes of the files
Talk:President of the Executive Council

message: I plan on reverting this page. Governors-general and their equivalent are not referred to as president of the executive council any more than Elizabeth II is ever called the president of the Privy Council. The British Lord President is actually a deputy to the sovereign for a specified agenda on particular occasions.
See Talk:President of the Executive Council. 202.0.43.181 04:50, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops. Above sentence obviously does not belong, please ignore. 202.0.43.181 04:51, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: As the President of the Executive Council of the Irish Free State was not the prime minister but the de facto president of the state, this page is not a disambiguation page! The Banner talk 12:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  not a disambiguation page, but a broad concept page
Talk:Mathew Carey

message: All the text is my original writing, a short part of a small research project on John Paul Jones and his time on the Ranger.  I included one quote, but otherwise the writing is all my own.  Sources are cited in standard MLA format, which is probably not the right way. Seanherman 13:35, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  source of text 

message: Hello,
I have The Autobiography of Mathew Carey in Microsoft Word format. I'd like to know if posting this autobiography on Wikipedia is appropriate, and if it is, how to do so.
Thank you.
George McDowell
Geomcd1949 02:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  the Autobiography of Mathew Carey
Talk:Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture

message: Wikipedia articles referring to or directly citing this work can, for convenience, footnote the reference by double bracketing EIEC, then giving the page number. Since few have access to this work, you should indicate the article name, and the author's last name, as appropriate. The double-bracketed EIEC will create a link to this page. One should also link to the category EIEC. 
thus,  yields . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dbachmann (talk • contribs) 13:32, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled, 2005
Talk:Telly Monster

message: I am not convinced that Telly Monster is Elmo's dad. See Elmo talk page.
--JimmyTheWig 13:42, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The idea of Telly impregnating anybody makes me want to laugh and cry at the same time. 142.161.204.112 07:07, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Aye. Even he suddenly snapped out of it and became Kermit-cool, the old Radiation King would've done its damage. InedibleHulk (talk) 10:48, 6 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Dad

message: Is it certain that Telly began in 1979 as a television-loving monster?  I have an episode from 1979 in which Telly appears in a sketch called "Cooking With Telly", and it's by and large the same Telly personality we know today, albeit with a different voice actor. Jphillst 08:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of Origin

message: Why does the infobox not show up right here?? Georgia guy 16:02, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 
Talk:Ardnamurchan Point

message: The new article Corrachadh Mor claims it is the westernmost point. NM416661. It's on Ardnamurchan peninsula, certainly, but a mile or so to the south of the Point. Looks like Ardnamurchan needs editing too. Extreme points of the United Kingdom has just been edited to say  Corrachadh Mor is the westernmost point on the British mainland and, if this is right, it should be given this status for the Scottish mainland too.
It looks pretty convincing to me. Are there any advocates for Ardnamurchan Point? Thincat 13:51, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "It is the only lighthouse in the UK built in the Egyptian style." ... which may be true, but is utterly unilluminating. Pun not really intended, but almost unavoidable. No mention of what an Egyptian style of lighthouse is in the lighthouse article. Aidan Karley (talk) 16:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Egyptian Style" ?? 

message: Somebody has changed the name of this page from the correct "Ardnamurchan Point" to "Point of Ardnamurchan". There doesn't seem to have been any discussion prior to this. Can this please be reverted? --Hrossey (talk) 09:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Just discovered how to do this myself. Hope I've done it correctly! --Hrossey (talk) 09:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inappropriate change of name
Template talk:Minor planet link abridged

message: ==Documentation==
==Changelog==
Urhixidur 14:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Administrative

message: Urhixidur 14:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Changelog
Talk:Salt bridge

message: No offence but to be clear I must say that there are too many mistakes here .
Salt bridge is not barely  for connecting two half-cells, the importance of which is it decreases the liquid junction potential . So KCl is often used here for the rates of moving for the ions are close enough for regular analytical jobs. But according to what I have learnt from university, NaCl is not OK!
Electrons can not exist in solutions like water or acid or alcohol. Anions (e.g. chloride) are carrying the negative charge in solution.
Isolating a very kind of metallic cation is not an advantage of salt bridge. It is an advantage of tri-electrode system .So I advise to delete the paragraph of isolation.
And why I do not edit the content ? I am a Chinese native speaker .I can read English well but compose poorly .Some English native speaker should do the editor's work . The Chinese version was based on the article here and  I have correct it .
Zhaiyu.zhaiyu (talk) 23:26, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Too many wrong contents here 

message: Although the single salt bridges described here are probably adequate in many cases (probably even NaCl for some purposes) I presume that the composition mentioned in the article on Liquid junction potential, using a solution saturated with KCl and NH4NO3 with some (how much?) Li-acetate corresponds to some kind of optimised composition.150.227.15.253 (talk) 09:17, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Salt bridge composition 

message: Although needed in many cases I expect salt bridges to suffer from more or less severe disadvantages due to diffusion in and out from the salt bridge and the electrolytes it is supposed to connect. The salt bridge may be replaced periodically but contamination of the other electrolytes will persist. How is this handles if for example measurements require a the use of a salt bridge over extended periods? It would be nice if somebody could treat such aspects in the article.150.227.15.253 (talk) 09:26, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Durability of salt bridges
Talk:Scouting in Wisconsin

message: This currently reads like an advertisement for Bay Lakes; which has great programs & is a great council, but probably shouldn't make up the bulk of this article. Milwaukee CC has its own page, while information on other councils is sparse at best. External links should be moved to bottom, while new pages should be created or properly linked where they exist for OA & camp information. Girl Scout information is tacked on awkwardly.
Vdub144 (talk) 15:14, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistant with rest of project

message: Is there no longer a Four Lakes Council? Chris 21:11, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Four Lakes?

message: :The following discussions are an archived debate. Please do not modify it. 
Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.  
*All three of the merges should happen per project standards. Rlevse 11:58, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: *support --Gadget850 ( Ed) 14:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camp Napowan merge 

message: The Upper Peninsula of Michigan is in Bay-Lakes Council too. 166.181.84.209 (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baylakes councils
Talk:Homesteading

message: This page reads as an apologia for colonialism "unsettled lands" were native lands that were occupied by almost entirely white "homesteaders". 2600:1700:5B20:CAA0:5DAA:D97C:16C:395E (talk) 17:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Apologia 

message: reference #3 does not support the sentence it is supposed to be supporting 89.208.4.157 (talk) 18:53, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference #3 does not support the sentence it is supposed to be supporting 

message: — Assignment last updated by Ccurry100 (talk) 21:24, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: ARH 371_The TransAtlantic_Cross-Cultural Representations
Talk:Indianhead Council

message: merge as per Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting/RulesStandards. Our intent is not to delete anyone's work or to minimize the importance of any article that already exists on the Wikipedia.  Instead our goal is to tighten the information, to make it more relevant and useful for the general Wikipedian.  This article will be absorbed in its entirety to the larger state Scouting article. The newer article will encompass OA lodges, Councils, early nonBSA Scouting organizations like Campfire or Woodcraft, Girl Scouting where applicable, and other ideas as they come up. Chris 18:10, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just wanted to mention my objection to this for the reasons stated on Talk:Scouting in Minnesota. What happened to having a discussion? Sulfur 04:19, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Brighton Beach Memoirs

message: In my opinion, there isn't sufficient info about either to warrant each one having its own article. SFTVLGUY2 17:11, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate play/film articles

message: honestly, i think this is like, the BEST SCRIPT EVER WRITTEN! (sarcasm) it's that awesome Goosemanrocks (talk) 02:08, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  honestly 
Talk:Marshfield, Wisconsin

message: The history section previously stated:  Marshfield was settled in 1868, quoting the Columbia-Lippincott Gazetteer.  Jones' 1923 History of Wood County agrees that the Rivers arrived in 1868, but the 1997 The Marshfield Story 1872 - 1997 clearly contradicts, stating 1872.  The newer source was apparently written by Jeff Kleiman, a local history professor, and reviewed by other local historians, so I'm inclined to favor it, though I don't know the evidence for the later date.  Jeff the quiet (talk) 19:40, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Settlement date question 

message: There are several people on the "Notable People" section who should probably be removed.  Several of them may have been born at the hospital in Marshfield but grew up in Stratford, Auburndale, Pittsville, etc.  Is someone who grew up and lived 20 miles from Marshfield really a notable person from Marshfield?  Seems to be a stretch.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.233.94.241 (talk) 16:58, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trim Notable People section? 

message: The units for precipitation are reversed. Also the value for 
 	Precip (in)	Min Tmp (°F)	Avg Tmp (°F)	Max Tmp (°F)
January	0.63	
February	0.10	
March	1.02	
April	2.23	
May	2.79	
June	4.00	
July	3.71	
August	4.28	
September	3.24	
October	1.87	
November	1.48	
December	0.58
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.60.15.211 (talk) 14:19, 1 January 2014‎
::If you see an error, by all means, fix it!  205.185.143.70 (talk) 01:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typographic error in Climate table 

message: I'm removing the claim that Marshfield's population around 1885 was all of New England origin.  No source was cited, and the 1880 census lists people born in Bavaria, Prussia, Germany, France, etc. along with people born in the U.S.  Jeff the quiet (talk) 14:26, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ethnic Origins 

message: I removed the reference to the 2014 school rankings data. This appears to be cherry-picked, from the peak of MHS's school ratings, and recent data is much less flattering. Either the most up-to-date, fully-inclusive data should be used or the ranking information should be excluded. I opted for the latter as their are known deficiencies / biases in these metrics.E8 (talk) 17:47, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed dated, cherry-picked education rankings
Talk:David Ricardo

message: The comparative advantage section degenerates into an attack on trade, which is not only inappropriate for a biography but wouldn't be neutral in an economics article. For example,
"The development economist Ha-Joon Chang challenges the argument that free trade benefits every country: [quote]."
These are the kinds of statements that are sourced to fringe, unorthodox or otherwise obscure economists. 
We don't need to speculate on what mainstream economists think about free trade because we already have surveys of opinion. It enjoys nearly unanimous support and thus it is worth reminding editors that Wikipedia is a mainstream encyclopedia. This means that writers and editors on Wikipedia should strive for articles that would be appreciated as being of the highest quality by a consensus of experts in any field of science or scholarship. Crucially, this means that Wikipedia content is not based on a popularity contest.
In other words, economic populism doesn't belong in articles about economics. Jonathan f1 (talk) 02:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: Karl Marx's economic theory is significantly influenced by Ricardo. In fact Marx presents his ideas by way of taking, or attempting to take, Ricardo's theory to its natural conclusion. Marx cites Ricardo extensively throughout Das Kapital as well as his draft Theories of Surplus Value, both which can be considered core elements of Marx's work.
It seems incontestable that Marx is more notable than Sraffa, yet only the latter is mentioned in the Influences section. Flavoredquark (talk) 21:12, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where’s Marx?
Talk:Cleveland Play House

message: This article would be improved by adding information regarding the fate of the old theatre after its sale to the Cleveland Clinic. Has it been demolished? Is it still in use in some fashion. Thanks for adding this information, Markhh (talk) 04:13, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  the old Play House today
Talk:Gabibbo

message: Gabibbo with double b is probably more correct --Melaen 15:34, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Judged "innocent"?  I guess that's an Italian verdict (in many places, that's not the terminology that would be used as a verdict in a case of this nature), but I do question the translation and the completeness of this claim.  For example, as I understand it, the court did not deny that this was a direct copy, but rather used a maneuver to claim MediaSet had developed a whole character, too.  As 161.6.41.150 points out, it should be noted who (a biased court) made this determination.  [Note, I have no connection with any party involved.  I simply came across the issue, found it interesting, researched it, and realized what a direct copy it was--and how ridiculous the ruling was.]--71.203.125.108 (talk) 16:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: 12 december 2007: Gabibbo and Antonio Ricci were definitely judged innocent. Artisto 84.100.79.152 (talk) 23:21, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Judged "innocent"?  I guess that's an Italian verdict (in many places, that's not the terminology that would be used as a verdict in a case of this nature), but I do question the translation and the completeness of this claim.  For example, as I understand it, the court did not deny that this was a direct copy, but rather used a maneuver to claim MediaSet had developed a whole character, too.  As 161.6.41.150 points out, it should be noted who (a biased court) made this determination.  [Note, I have no connection with any party involved.  I simply came across the issue, found it interesting, researched it, and realized what a direct copy it was--and how ridiculous the ruling was.]--71.203.125.108 (talk) 16:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy
Talk:Well-made play

message: Over the next month or so, I will add information to this article as part of an assignment in my graduate Theater History class. I hope to build upon what is there to help improve the article. Feedback is appreciated. Thanks in advance for your help, All!  Mcraab123 (talk) 03:41, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: New edits

message: I have merged:
* Well-made play
* Well-Made Play
into this article.  Briefly, I have largely imported the content of the latter into the former.  The title of the former was correctly capitalised, but the content was completely unsourced.  The resulting article needs more work. — mholland (talk) 16:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Continuing with the previous request, could someone please add information about dramatic structure and plays that exemplify this system? While Ibsen may have transcended the form, his work really defined the term as it is currently used in dramatic criticism. The wiki entry on the play Picnic (play) has an excellent bullet list of dramatic structure which should be used in the definition of a Well-Made Play. There should also be a brief discussion of the way the realism movement reacted to and ultimately defined the Well-Made Play. LMKush (talk) 20:56, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged pages: May 2007

message: My French may be wrong, but I think there's a T sound at the end of "faite". If it had a masculine ending, it wouldn't, but it has a feminine ending. Is my French pedantic, or should we correct the article? --66.30.213.190 (talk) 00:57, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've never heard it pronounced, but that's my understanding too. -Phoenixrod (talk) 02:07, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation of "pièce bien faite"
Talk:AS-203

message: There seems to be a formatting problem here (at least when viewed in Firefox 2.0.0.5 - not checked in IE) - the infobox has pushed all the section edit links down to the final section. I have no idea how to fix this. Anyone? --ukexpat 14:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll try an idea.LanceBarber (talk) 17:38, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formatting problem 

message: "Fragments of the first stage supposedly hit a German fishing vessel."  This claim needs to be cited, or the text should be removed from the last section.  Memetics (talk) 17:09, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's gone. JustinTime55 (talk) 19:51, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation needed