lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stephen Roth Institute

message: tau.ac.il, slightly reworded. --tickle me 23:33, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: source

message: From the link to the website, I see that the institute in in TAU, in the Gilman building, affiliated with the Weiner library. Is that the Wiener Library in London, or the Weiner Library at TAU? --Sreifa (talk) 12:52, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  location?
Talk:Baby corn

message: Is baby corn not associated with Thai cuisine in the US? Nil Einne 16:53, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Baby corn 

message: I have made edits to this page & they show up in the mark up on the editing page, but are not displayed on the actual page. Is there something wrong with the page or my edits?
Eab969 21:47, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This can happen when the servers get behind in processing updates.  It should correct itself in a little while. -- Beland (talk) 00:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Does anyone have a reliable source that says what happens to the stalks when the baby corn is removed? Does the plant compensate by trying growing more ears? If so, how many ears of baby corn can be taken before the plant gives up and dies? Tomertalk 18:02, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happens to the stalks? 

message: The baby corn#In popular culture section doesn't, IMHO, have any "notable" entries. I'd suggest removing the whole section.
I've added an {in popular culture} tag for now, but if I don't hear objections, I'll remove the section in a few days. -- Narsil (talk) 19:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hearing no objections, I removed the "In popular culture" section. -- Narsil (talk) 18:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suggest removing "In Popular Culture"
Talk:University of Toronto Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering

message: Where was the original, "Little Red Skulehouse" located?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.100.53.238 (talk) 16:43, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where was the skulehouse? 

message: How is there no explicit mentioning of John Galbraith, the first principal of SPS?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.100.53.238 (talk) 16:45, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Galbraith? 
Talk:Too Close for Comfort

message: I removed the stub to this article, although more could be written about it.  It appears to be too long to be considered a stub. Rt66lt 23:40, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: I have put in this article several times that actor Jim J. Bullock's name appears as Jm J. Bullock in the credits of this show; there is no letter "i". I also put that it is not known if this misspelling was done on purpose or in error. For some reason this fact keeps being removed from the article. This is not speculation or guessing, IT IS A FACT. His name DOES appear as "Jm", not "Jim". Although his name may be Jim, it doesn't change the fact that the credits state Jm. You can Youtube it yourself and see his name clearly states Jm J. Bullock, not Jim. This is just a two line sentence in the entire article; I see no reason why it keeps being removed. I have read speculation in various other articles and those things seem to remain in the article, so why is something that you can blatantly SEE is the truth keep being removed from the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.146.55.202 (talk) 11:23, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added "as Jm J. Bullock" to the info box (that much is verifiable). Speculation as to why he's credited as "Jm" is, well, speculation. Wikipedia is not for speculation, it is for verifiable information. If you see speculation is other articles, it is there because no one has removed it. Feel free to do so. If you do find a verifiable source for it being "unknown" whether this is accidental (in the credits of several major productions over a number of years?!?!) or on purpose, that information would likely belong in Jim J. Bullock. Better still, you might look for a reliable source as to why he is credited that way (you're unlikely to find a reliable source saying that something so simple is "unknown", clearly someone knows). FWIW, my quick search didn't find a reliable source with an answer, just an unreliable one giving an anecdote that it was initially a typo by a secretary and Bullock decided to use it as it was more memorable than "Jim". - SummerPhD (talk) 11:55, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Credits

message: "Cosmic Cow" is now also the name of an astronomical phenomenon so this needs a disambiguation line and a link to the astronomical article, whatever it ends up being named. Fast Blue Ultraluminous Transients? 2601:441:4900:A6E0:A9CC:57B1:D384:2E4D (talk) 23:00, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cosmic Cow Redirect 

message: Originally re-aired on TBS from September to December 1991. 71.247.208.187 (talk) 21:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  TBS picked up "Too Close for Comfort"
Talk:Counterfactual conditional

message: I'd like to switch over the terminology used in the article, from protasis to antecedent and from apodosis to consequent. The reason being that these terms are pretty much universally used in the contemporary linguistics and philosophy literature. But I wanted to post here, just in case anybody objects and wants to discuss. Botterweg14 (talk) 01:53, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antecedent/consequent versus protasis/apodosis 

message: Why does P not obtain in world w should P but not Q obtain in some world v? It seems clear that both P and Q can obtain in w, where P but not Q obtains in some world v without contradiction.
I think the contributor meant to say, 'To see why, observe that if P is false at w then □(P→Q) will be false at w if there is some accessible world v where P is true and Q is not'  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lampooner101 (talk • contribs) 14:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strict Conditional and the falsity of 'P' 

message: They simply are not a tense. what is happening is the use of attracted sequence.  (aka. backshifting) Stjohn1970 (talk) 05:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  fake tense
Talk:Original meaning

message: "In a pinch, I may turn out to be a faint-hearted originalist." I couldn't find a single instance of this quote on Google. Where does it come from? -- WikiAce 00:03, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It's from Originalism: The Lesser Evil, 57 U. Cin. L. Rev. 849 (1989) at 864. However, this is a d'oh moment - I put that line in from memory, and got the wrong word: he said "crunch" not "pinch". I'll correct it momentarily and add the citation. Simon Dodd 02:01, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scalia quote 

message: It would be helpful to expand this page and provide a more fair and balanced view.  The article seems a bit one-sided, noteably in the 'Practice' section, where the virtues of originalism and some advantages over other viewpoints are discussed.  A discussion of these advantages is acceptible, but a more thorough examination of how original meaning compares to other constitutional practices can provide a more complete picture, and a discussion of possible disadvantages would correct the questionable neutrality of the article.  Nddavis47 (talk) 18:26, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality 

message: I removed the line "in a particularly strongly-worded attack" and replaced it with "He also stated."  The wording of the introduction to his quote seemed unnecessarily biased.--Julien Deveraux (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: POV

message: "Let me put it this way; there are really only two ways to interpret the Constitution -- try to discern as best we can what the framers intended or make it up. No matter how ingenious, imaginative or artfully put, unless interpretive methodologies are tied to the original intent of the framers, they have no more basis in the Constitution than the latest football scores. To be sure, even the most conscientious effort to adhere to the original intent of the framers of our Constitution is flawed, as all methodologies and human institutions are; but at least originalism has the advantage of being legitimate and, I might add, impartial."
This appears to be an argument for original intent not original meaning? I propose deletion. Opinions?Smitty1337 (talk) 08:51, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Justice Thomas quote? 

message: Original meaning is also a principle of statutory interpretation in other jurisdictions. (See e.g. Ruth Sullivan's Statutory Interpretation for an examination of this concept in Canadian law.) What do we think of restructuring the article so that it takes a more global approach? This would require rewriting the lede, putting all the American content in one section, and putting other jurisdictional content in different sections. /wiae /tlk 14:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  A broader scope?
Talk:Potometer

message: I made a pretty heavy cock-pyedit; it makes quite clear that, per the AfD nomination, the preparation and use sections are not encyclopedic.  If no one minds, I'll move them to the talk page until we can find a better place for them.
The wikibooks link is broken; I think they mean to reference the School Science HOWTO.  But this isn't in there; instead we have a bad back-reference to School biology experiments and demonstrations here on Wikipedia.  Bit of a mess.  --Mgreenbe 12:26, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preparation/Use
Talk:Code Red (computer worm)

message: "It used the pattern NNNNNNNN..."
:How can we defend? Files fill with junk and no way see which is your work, which is your fault or external overflow. 
:How did it use this pattern? --67.172.99.160 00:25, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Looking at my own server logs from back then, it was using this long string of characters as the beginning of the query string (the part after the ? in the URL) to overflow the buffer. I'm updating the article to clarify this. Mpeg4codec 02:32, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I explained the worm payload is the set of characters following the last 'N'. --_N_e_g_r_u_l_i_o 19:44, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

text: @80.79.152.130 What is happening over there?!??!!??1!11?1?1! It's Cyan (talk) 03:52, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Requirement

message: The opening paragraph of the article suggests the latter, viz "In product development and process optimization, a requirement is a singular documented physical or functional need that a particular design, product or process aims to satisfy.", but many would argue that Requirements are obligatory for a given system. It seems dangerous to hold two contradictory definitions at the same time if this leads to confusion in projects. Even if one were to introduce qualifiers (canonical vs non-canonical requirements), or prefer the term 'suggestions', this can influence the way that projects are developed.
As a case in point, a project which divides features into requirements and suggested features might simply file all suggestions into the "circular file".
Is this an issue? 204.44.137.252 (talk) 13:15, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: A requirement is as its name implies: required. It not just an aim. For a thing to be acceptable, it must satisfy its requirements. ... FWIW, That its 'singular' is a good practice, but not necessary. That it's document is also a good idea, but also not necessary. ... I re-wrote the first line to focus on the core meaning. Stevebroshar (talk) 04:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are Requirements required, or merely suggestions?
Talk:Stevens Creek (California)

message: Presumably this creek was named after someone named Stevens.  It would be interesting to add this information to the article. Grover cleveland (talk) 03:57, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of name

message: Please update this article for the California Historical Landmark: Arroyo de San José Cupertino as a landmark is listed on the California Historical Landmarks in Santa Clara County. You can simply add a section for "California State Historical Landmark #800, with the following text (I would do it myself but I am partiall blocked right now):
* "On May 29, 1968, the California State Park Commission, in cooperation with the city of Cupertino Historical Society, erected a commemorative plaque that designates this site as California Historical Landmark #800, Arroyo de San José Cupertino."
Greg Henderson (talk) 21:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Update made with changes to citations after being unblocked. Greg Henderson (talk) 23:26, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical Landmark
Talk:Borel measure

message: The article states:
:The Borel measure is not complete.
The article on complete measure states that completions are unique. What is the completion of the Borel measure (is it the Lebesgue measure)?  linas 00:53, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes— at least in the case of the real line that is how Lebesgue measure is defined. - Gauge 22:41, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Completion

message: I have understood the term "Borel measure" to mean any measure on the sigma-algebra of Borel sets in a topological space.  Does this jar with what others here have seen? Michael Hardy 21:54, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand a "Borel measure" to be any measure on the Borel sigma-algebra which is finite on compact sets, so I would say that this article seems misleading and should be expanded. Madmath789 15:05, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree (see e.g. http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/BorelMeasure.html), so I have corrected the text for it. The article still need expanding though. Simon Lacoste-Julien (talk) 06:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

text: following up on comment by Michael Hardy: the requirement that compact sets have finite measure, along with the measure of a set can be approximated from above by those of open sets, are for "regular" measures, stronger than mere Borel. Mct mht 21:13, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Any measure

message: I might see a problem with the text which reads 
"To clarify, when one says that the Lebesgue measure \lambda is an extension of the Borel measure \mu, it means that every Borel-measurable set E is also a Lebesgue-measurable set, and the Borel measure and the Lebesgue measure coincide on the Borel sets (i.e., \lambda(E)=\mu(E) for every Borel measurable set)." 
Yet here (http://www.math.cornell.edu/~neldredge/7770/7770-lecture-notes.pdf) mention that only Borel measures may exist in infinite dimensional spaces. I am not sure if I understand correctly, but it appears that completion of infinite dimension sets may be infeasible.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mouse7mouse9 (talk • contribs) 07:07, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I found Infinite-dimensional Lebesgue measure, which shows that the lebesgue measure cannot exist in infinite dimensional spaces, therefore not all Borel measurable sets have a Lebesgue measure. The article needs to be corrected to account for finite dimensions. Mouse7mouse9 07:25, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: That statement was made in a section titled "the real number line", which is one-dimensional. Thus, infinite dimensions should not have entered the conversation. Never-the-less, I added a clarifying remark, anyway. 67.198.37.16 (talk) 20:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  An unstated assumption?
Talk:Ion Țiriac

message: Top 300 is a magazine published yearly by the economics newspqper Capital which appears always in November, so the indication about the number in april was not apropriate. It reached now the 3rd or 4th edition and a lot of comments take place around the Top yearly. Ion Ţiriac was always a top presence, until this year he was considered the second wealthiest romanian after Iosif Constantin Drăgan. I know that because I've read all editions except the one that jus appeared this year. It is true that www.capital.ro is a page requiring subscription, but I think they must be cited because they are the source of information. --Orioane 00:59, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Top 300

message: A discussion that may affect the name or title of this article is ongoing here.  Please voice any opinions or concerns on that page.  After the discussion concludes, this article may be moved to a different title, in accordance with Wikipedia's Naming Conventions.  Thank you.  Tennis expert (talk) 19:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion concerning this article

message: The name of this article should be changed to "Ion Tiriac" because that is the name used on the English-language websites of the official governing bodies of tennis, which are the Association of Tennis Professionals and the International Tennis Federation.  This is also the name used on the English-language website of Davis Cup.  Finally, this is the name used on the English-language website of the only Grand Slam tournament he won, the French Open (Roland Garros) men's doubles.  Tennis expert (talk) 04:52, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
*Oppose Per many discussions and per WP:DIACRITICS. Diacritics do not make a name non-english. And just dropping them is a spelling error. So the article as it is currently titled is appropriate. -DJSasso (talk) 12:11, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Open systems architecture

message: This article is a blob of text that could stand some structuring.  The links also don't always elucidate what is being discussed.
The OSI model article is pretty good.  I almost think that this article would be better if it was shorter and it pointed more clearly to the OSI model article. Volfy 01:09, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blob of text and links 

message: Reference: Open Systems Architecture Contract Guidebook for Program Managers, Version 1.1, May 2013, URL: https://acc.dau.mil/osaguidebook 
"Open Systems Architecture" is not "Open Services Architecture" or "Services Oriented Architecture."  The word "Open" as a proper noun has, in telecommunications, come to mean infrastructure integration [AKA: Internet] and information interoperability [AKA: NetCentric, XML, UML ...] for the purpose of providing nexus-generation information services [AI for/of CMS, information management, digital libraries, knowledge management, business process and workflow ...].  
To get there IMO the nexus-generation information services (NexGIS) requires "Open" applied to standards, protocols, metadata, data schema ... and "Open" competition business models.  IOW:  The legacy proprietary business model is not suitable for future technology information, information sharing, collaborative synergistic communities, and information/systems lifecycle logistics and sustainment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.153.24.155 (talk) 22:18, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  USA MoD/DoD refer to OSA 

message: In light of my dePROD I've done a little to make the article more specific and stopping its specific tie to telecommunications.  I believe this widened scope allows for easier establishment of notability.  I've kludged a little restructure to help the article on its way but I'd expect my start to be completely worked over in the course of time.  Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Made more generic
Talk:Bates Motel (film)

message: This article was redirected to Psycho as a result of an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 01:12, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: This turned up on IMDb and appears to be relevant enough for its own entry. --Ra1d3n 21:28, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Entry for TV pilot
Talk:Fullmetal Alchemist: Dream Carnival

message: This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 01:34, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Articles for Deletion debate

message: so this discussion page is dead, but does anyone know a torrent location of this that is completely available? --Taylert123 (talk) 21:36, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh Wikipedia isn't a forum. Discuss it elsewhere. moocows rule 03:06, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: hey...
Talk:Mount Murray (New South Wales)

message: 202.168.39.12 is a school IP address, belonging to Oxley College, that is responsible for quite a bit of vandalism of the breast/boobies style (as well as some genuine contributions). It is possible therefore that Mt Murray is not commonly refered to as the biggest hole in Australia - although I can't quote a source for this. IanBailey (talk) 01:38, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tropical Storm Thelma

message: More impact and intro. Jdorje 19:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo

message: *Ormoc City disaster 
* Ormoc rises from flash flood tragedy
*Reconnaissance Report: Flooding Resulting From Typhoon Uring In Ormoc City, Leyte Province, The Philippines
*The Politics of Disaster
*Ormocanons commemorate 18th year flash flood
*ReliefWeb
Cyclonebiskit (talk) 13:56, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:Leoline Jenkins

message: The article gives his service as MP for Oxford University as 1679-85.  However,  Charles II's last parliament was dissolved in 1681.  I therefore propose to give that date as the end of his service as MP.
Alekksandr (talk) 16:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Service as MP

message: The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography gives Jenkins' year of birth as 1625 (https://doi.org/10.1093/ref:odnb/14732, subscription needed). The previous edition of the DNB and the Encyclopaedia Britannica give it as 1623. It would be helpful to have a clarification of the reason for the change. Addedentry (talk) 10:39, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth
Talk:Pukapuka

message: the article needs info on the pukapukans themselves. Gringo300 01:47, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article flip-flops between asserting that 2 women and 15 men or 17 men survived the ~1590 catastrophe. Which is it? The article should either acknowledge this disagreement or decide which statistic is more reputable. As is, the article is inconsistent within itself. Uchiha Itachi 25 (talk) 12:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  15 men or 17 men? 

message: From the article: They were found by Teleuka Iotua huddled in a hut belonging to Lakulaku Tutala on Loto Village's reserve, where he gave them coconuts to drink. 2001:5B0:50D8:A358:441B:D4BF:C51F:9CE1 (talk) 20:43, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How Does One Drink A Coconut, Anyway?
Talk:Isobestic point

message: This article looks very similar to http://www.frca.co.uk/article.aspx?articleid=332 Kappa 01:48, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The article may look similar but indeed is different.HappyApple 01:35, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Similar

message: Article Isobestic point/Temp has been modified from previous version and its content may not be accused for being copyvio.HappyApple 02:43, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixed copyright issue