lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tara June Winch

message: "Andrew Bolt used Winch's name in two controversial articles about "political" Aborigines. Bolt asserted that Winch and other fair skinned Aborigines claimed aboriginality to advance their careers. The Australian court system has since ruled that the articles were inflammatory, offensive and contravened the Racial Discrimination Act.."
This section should remain in the article - since it just happens to be about the subject, Tara Winch, and how she was the "victim" of  Racial Discrimination. This has not only gotten media attention, (note: a link has been removed as it is a broken link), (eg. The Sydney Morning Herald) and also the attention of the Federal Court of Australia. 
User: John Nevard: This section is one of the only sections in the article that has been referenced, and if you were so worried about it being not substantially sourced, why didn't you try and source it better (instead of removing the whole section)? Better yet, since this is a WP:BLP, why didn't you remove the  Tara June Winch#Life section? Since that just happens to be fully unsourced. Out of curiousity, you have edited the Andrew Bolt article, quite a number of times. Is it a WP:COI or what? -- MST☆R    (Chat Me!) 05:01, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: As you would know if you had done a modicum of research, Winch didn't even join the case against Bolt. It is utterly irrelevant to a biography of her. The matter is discussed on the Andrew Bolt article, and others involved in the legal matter, because it relates to those persons. As far as I'm aware, there is no conflict of interest in actually doing proper research and complying with Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Nevard (talk) 05:06, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: So it's just a happy coincidence you came here and saved the day, by removing sourced content. Okay, I'll be getting more opinions on this. Thank You -- MST☆R    (Chat Me!) 05:09, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

text: Or to make things more easier, I'll do source-finding for the soon-to-be "Other" section, myself. Already got a few :) -- MST☆R    (Chat Me!) 05:12, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Any re-addition of that information violates WP:BLP and WP:UNDUE.  How could negative claims proven in court to be wrong possibly be important enough to belong in the biography of a living person?  Perhaps that info belongs in Bolt's article (though not necessarily with Winch's name), but it certainly does not belong here.  Qwyrxian (talk) 05:45, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

text: Good to know. However, just because you can find some sources that mention both Winch, and the Bolt matter, does not mean the Bolt matter is relevant in any way to this article, which is a biography of an author. Policy on biographies of living persons is rigorously enforced, and I fail to see how any of the sources out there are going to satisfy some pretty key requirements of that policy. Nevard (talk) 05:52, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Other" section
Talk:Saint Mark's Coptic Orthodox Cathedral (Alexandria)

message: There doesn't seem to be any sources for the age of the church. 311 may be the date for something at Bucolia, but that isn't this church, and that claim is only a tradition.. Dougweller (talk) 21:03, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age 

message: The persistent rumor of the body within (and brought to Venice) as of being of Alexander the Great might well be addressed.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.9.106.111 (talk) 07:50, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumors of the body of being of Alexander
Talk:Ecampaign

message: Response to proposed deletion:
The Proposal for Deletion is under the suggestion of 'non-notable neologism'. The author contests this.
Ecampaign is a natural derivation of the terminology & taxonomy of EMarketing and Email.
The term is in current use by a growing community / industry & there is a consensus on precisely understood meaning.
www would and wiki would have been rejected on the same grounds - ad absurdum, sic.
if the AfD isnt removed by the poster and there has been no conclusive discussion, then i shall remove the AfD myself. Have done some minor modification and tidying up.--Rjcain 07:19, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops, we seem to look at the same stuff at the same time. I just started a proposed multi-merge of various articles, including this one, into internet marketing. I think that would be the better solution. What do you think? We should avoid splitting the discussions. I started a discussion at the internet marketing talk page where all merge proposals already link to. Please respond there. Thanks. --roy<sac> Talk! .oOo. 21:17, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Hanging Church

message: I am tempted to ask how the supposedly ancient church acquired its modern Jesuit-style exterior? --Ghirla-трёп- 14:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No systematic "History" section? Built when, what remains of that, rebuilt when and how often, which parts belong to each period...? Arminden (talk) 19:41, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I removed the categories '3rd century church' and '3rd c Egyptian establishment', as neither is supported by any source. 2A01:C22:AC06:4700:40C0:AD1A:741F:BAD4 (talk) 01:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing about its history?
Talk:Robert John Godfrey

message: This is a WIP only because it's late & I wanted to get it started. I've known RJG & The Enid for years but will endeavour to provide verifiable references for anything I say! Please post comments here, it's on my watch list so I'll get back to you ASAP, usually within an hour. Any contributions & suggestions welcome. Rodhullandemu 01:26, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Fixed --Rodhullandemu (talk - contribs) 15:58, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:FallOfHyperion.jpg

message: I am sure that no-one has ever heard of this person.  Surely wikipedia should only be used to provide biographies for persons that at least have a measure of public recognition.  I propose this page is removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.72.243.97 (talk) 20:50, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Not every professional musician has a place on wikipedia. This musician has not made an impact the world of music and I think does not deserve an article.--Karljoos (talk) 14:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, and nothing mean-spirited here, it's just a matter of notability.--Karljoos (talk) 14:06, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I didn't think much of the first sentence up there, and the second wasn't much better. As for the whole notability issue, just don't get me started.Lee M (talk) 03:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

text: I will not pursue the deletion of this page, but I don't think that this person, even though he might meet the General Notability Criteria, should have an article here. I am honestly interested in what you haveto say, so please say what you have to say regarding the notability of this person and the comments made by other editors here. Cheers--Karljoos (talk) 10:12, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove page 

message: ....is james honeyman-scott, later of the pretenders.
04:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "jim scott"...
Talk:Peter Cleeland

message: I'm not sure what needs to be done to have the "This article does not cite any references or sources" box removed. I have placed references on the page. Are these insufficient? If so, what references are necessary? I note that the current member for McEwan, Fran Bailey has no references at all and so am somewhat perplexed as to why the requirements are different.
Thanks for any suggestions.
:Please sign your posts.  All articles need to be sourced, including Fran Bailey's.  I have now added tag, but see Wikipedia:Be bold.  I have taken tag of this one, but date, place and cause of death needs citing (the date can be found in hansard, but not the cause or place).Grahamec 09:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of anarchist movements by region

message: I'd like to suggest renaming this article to List of Anarchist movements by region and making it the main article for Category:Anarchist movements by region.  Any objections?  If this gets no responses in a couple of days, I'll assume there is no conflict and do it.--Cast 01:33, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems fine. I also removed the Somalia article, and am curious if the Russia article should stay in Asia or Europe, it can't be both. Murderbike 18:47, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as anarchism is concerned, the glut of its history has been located in Europe, so perhaps there, but it should be noted that anarchism did play a role in the asian regions of Russia, if only because Russian anarchists exiled in Siberia would escape eastward, bringing anarchy with them to areas of Manchuria, Korea, and Japan.  I'll move it to Europe now.--Cast 19:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article 

message: Poland belongs to central Europe, not eastern!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gggrzesiek (talk • contribs) 15:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poland belongs to central Europe, not eastern 

message: The links for Antigua and Barbuda, Costa Rica and Belize all point to articles for the countries in question rather than anything to do with anarchism. Why are they there?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.4.49.46 (talk) 16:33, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Irrelevant links 

message: What purpose does this list serve? It adds nothing to what the category already accomplishes more effectively. (The  navbox also lists the regions with dedicated articles.) If we removed this list's redlinks, which currently compose the vast majority of its entries, what would even be left? czar 16:47, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Philia Zintzo

message: Philia Zintzo is a form of Philia, but is I suppose not widely known by this name (it's a Basque appellate, that's where the 'zintzo' [noble] comes from) It's something Basque tradition holds as highly desirable. I see how it might not be best to create an entire article for something that's known only by a regional name, but it's no hoax either way. If there is no reason for the article to continue to exist, then perhaps adding it as a subtopic in Philia would be appropriate. But Philia Zintzo is indeed 'noble friendship' following the Basque tradition. Master12616 01:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Well it's regional, but it's not false
Talk:Vento (motorcycle manufacturer)

message: Explanation: I made a disambiguation for it because the word Vento is also a term of Italian origin that refers a surname. Please see: Vento (surname). Some information about Vento motorcycles could be incomplete because there are no records available at the time of the request. Nevertheless, several Vento models are still manufactured and distributed globally. Apparently, that's the only information available on the web:  – Thanks for your attention. MusiCitizen (talk) 15:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

message: Hola 2806:10A6:19:C37A:48:A7F8:9CF0:149D (talk) 01:38, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gn
Talk:Gameswf

message: I've made this article bigger, mostly getting stuff from the official website. --DFRussia 02:06, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A little over 7 years later, done. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 23:28, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanded 

message: I'm trying to find a secondary source to corroborate the Scaleform connection claimed on gameswf's website (I have no reason to doubt him and have heard of the connection myself through the grapevine, but a reliable secondary source would be nice). -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 23:28, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scaleform
Talk:Love to Infinity

message: Love to Infinity are Platinum selling (Whitney houson-Heartbreak Hotel), Grammy nominated (Diana King-Say a little prayer) remixers/producers. Their 15 year club and pop chart career has seen hundreds of productions for world class bands and vocalists. Scroll down   http://www.discogs.com/artist/Love+To+Infinity  for an almost complete list. Their influence on the pop and club charts is notable, with 3 Top 40 singles in '95-'96, a headlining appearance at Ministry of Sounds Wembley arena gig, a Ministry of sound tour, a Hacienda tour, and Top 20 records more recently under the name Soda Club. Whilst maybe not familiar to the average Radio 3 listener, the way they took the very electronic early 90's dance music and fused it with american Salsoul influence brought a whole new direction to uk clubs, suddenly the uk had a sound that could compete with the USA and subsequently LTI took on a huge amount of work from America, including the Gloria Estafan track "Everlasting Love" which became the main version released as a Special "Everlasting Love to Infinity" CD and Gloria shot the video to that mix. It is downloadable on iTunes still. And her and the band mimed to the Love to Infinity disco version on Top of the Pops.
Recently back in the Top 40 with "Finally" on Positiva(EMI) Love to infinity have recruited Top 10 and former N-Trance singer Kelly Llorenna as their new singer.
This is a long-spanning and influential career, with numerous Top 40 hits, gold and platinum discs and a fair amount of respect.
Love to Infinity are already mentioned many times in Wikipedia - the 'Into the Groove ' page, listing the Madonna remixes.
And the 'They Don't care about us' page listing the Michael Jackson remixes to name but two. Just these 2 mixes sparked a raft of immitators as high profile music will.
Thank you
Luminol77 02:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:New Jersey Transit Police Department

message: Looking good, perhaps add a couple more references and then try for WP:GA when you feel ready. :) SGGH speak! 11:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment 

message: Pictures for this article have NOT been deleted. Instead, they will all be accessible by the Commons link at the bottom of the article. Poster Rebel3986, who contributed 4 of the 5 pictures, I have moved all pictures to there using the CommonsHelper, and so your pictures are not lost. Thank you. --AEMoreira042281 05:48, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: Who was in charge of the New Jersey Transit Police web site.  It has incorrect information refering to who trained there k-9 squad.
It was the Essex County Sheriff's Office not the Essex County Police Department. Who is now by the way absorbed into the Sheriff's Office.
Give credit to where credit is due.  
Just would like everyone to know that bit of information.  It would be nice if someone would change the web site and acknowledge the Essex County Sheriff's Office.
:If you have a source that says it was the Sheriffs Office that trained NJTPD K9 officers, we can change the article immediately. If you don't, I will search for a source, however, will not change the article yet(I'll do so in a few days). Also, you say that the Essex County Police Dept was absorbed into the Essex County Sheriffs Office. When did this occur? Is it possible the Police Dept trained NJTPD K9 officers before it was absorbed into the Sheriffs Office? I am not familiar with this, which is why I am asking you. If anyone else has info or a source on this, I'd greatly appreciate it posted. MOOOOOPS (talk) 01:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Essex County Sheriff
Talk:Pack burro racing

message: On May 8, 2012 Pack Burro Racing became A Summer Heritage Sport of Colorado. Here is the HJR12-1021 <http://www.leg.state.co.us/clics/clics2012a/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/3C07AE23B8DDF9C1872579DE006E3D3D?open&file=HJR1021_rev.pdf>
Brad M. Wann
10/19/2013
Media Relations 
Pack Burro Racing  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.25.138.81 (talk) 15:04, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pack Burro Racing is a Colorado Summer Heritage Sport  

message: I don't know 200.24.141.13 (talk) 15:56, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many donkey do participate
Talk:Swansea Mall

message: This Wikipedia article is a cut and paste from the deadmalls.com page:
http://www.deadmalls.com/malls/swansea_mall.html
Deadmallsanita 02:35, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

message: I have just re-written the introduction to this page, and made some fixes in the info box. I did a bit of Googleing, but I could not find much information on the mall, other than the deadmalls.com page (above). 
It would be appreciated that if you find any information on Swansea Mall, either edit the article or post it here. Thanks!
Catsrule27 (talk) 20:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Rewriting
Talk:Dairylea (cheese)

message: Adding general product information.
After reading the news article, I realised that there's no Wiki article about Dairylea.
:Your article is largely an attack. That's not allowed. Fix it to be more neutral, and do so quickly or it will be deleted. Realkyhick 02:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where? It still doesn't take away from the fact that your main assertion is that it is high in salt and fats, which may be correct but it is still mainly an attack. That violates neutral point of view policies. Realkyhick 02:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure this qualifies as a speedy.  Just because a food has been found to have high salt and fats doesn't make it an attack.  Especially when it's backed up by valid references.  And I don't see how pointing out the truth violates NPOV.  The article also states that it was reformulated.  IE, no more high salt and fat (per the BBC, anyway).  As such, I'm going to remove the speedy tag.  Granted, I'm not sure of the point of the article to begin with, but that's a matter for AFD, not CSD.  --Kbdank71 03:20, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been changed a bit since I tagged it. It's somewhat better now, and I agree it isn't in speedy territory anymore. Realkyhick 06:42, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I know it's a small and insignificasnt point, but Strip Cheese (by Dairylea) is NOTHING like Cheese Strings. Just thought I'd mention it. (For future use, 'cos you'll definitely need it, they're like dairylea slices but long and thin and sandwiched together - so, unlike Cheese strings, the cheese it already cut.) God, I'm such a nerd. FlannyBabes (talk) 21:35, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cheese strings? Really?
Talk:Area codes 819, 873, and 468

message: 846 is not for magog.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.118.222.166 (talk) 05:29, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  error? 
Talk:John Wamsley

message: Earth Sancuaries re-directs here, but is not even mentioned.
Not a single line about the wildlife sanctuaries he built.
The bio stops in the 60s.
The fate of his company and the recent state is missing as well. Reference 4 gives most of the information, but is only cited for this cat hat, surely not the best source.
"importance=low" - Is this the way the Autralian Wiki people treat one of their leading and envisioning conservationists?
Jens from Germany --47.64.155.200 (talk) 07:51, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  this article is a stub and ridiculous
Talk:Pedro Juan Caballero, Paraguay

message: As coordenadas estão erradas.
==Flag is wrong==--79.152.101.164 (talk) 14:52, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Homogeneous relation

message: :: A homogeneous relation is a mathematical relation between sets X and Y in which X is the same set as Y and have the same domain and range.
Huh?  If X is the same set as Y, why not just say it's a relation from a set X to itself?  Why complicate the language instead of making the thing appear as simple as it really is?  "...and have" makes no sense; was "...and has" intended?  "has the same domain" would mean you're saying TWO things both have the same domain.  What are those two things?  It doesn't say.  Or did it mean the domain is the same as the range?  If so, that's what it should say.  This is very very vaguely written. Michael Hardy 03:04, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well it's a good point on one hand. How silly to create a new name for "being the same thing as." All the things you mention should certainly be clarified. However, be mindful. The simple analysis is not always the best one. For instance, we actually use the law of identity A=A in proofs of theorems all the time. This is the name of the "mathematical relation," form of this concept as opposed to heterogeneous relation on which I have no information. Perhaps someone could help me out and look into it. I am curious to know what the formulation for a heterogeneous relation is. Be well, Gregbard 05:34, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: What does it mean?

message: Shouldn't this, like Endorelation, just redirect to Binary relation?  That is, if it's really used this way... I've not seen it myself, but I wouldn't be surprised if some paper uses this term with that meaning.
CRGreathouse (t | c) 19:47, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems that what Greg has written would need to be rewritten as "A homogeneous relation is a mathematical relation between sets X and Y in which X is the same set as Y. That is, the domain and range of the relation are the same." in order to have any meaning. Of course, as Michael has pointed out, it would be just as helpful to say a homogenous relation is a mathematical relation between a set X and itself, or even simply a binary relation on a set X. If this is what is meant, and the term is actually used this way, then it is the same as endorelation, and already covered at binary relation, as CRGreathouse says. Unless there is more material on this topic than can be reasonably included in that article, there is no point in this being any more than a redirect. Mind you, from the first reference I found that does use the term in that way, I don't see why a homogenous relation would have to be binary, and in general there doesn't seem to be any one accepted meaning for the term. JPD (talk) 17:47, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Sandymount Strand

message: I'm afraid I may have opened a giant can of worms here as it was me who initially included the section on the characters of Ulysses and their actions on Sandymount Strand. But anyway; here are the facts: Joyce DELIBERATELY left it ambiguous as to what exactly happens with Gertrude McDowell and Leopold Bloom on Sandymount Strand. In a letter addressing a reader's question of what DID happen, Joyce states that NOTHING happened between Joyce and Gerty as the whole incident HAPPENED IN BLOOM'S IMAGINATION. Personally I feel that the idea of a whole chapter of a book happening purely in the mind of the protagonist whilst masturbating is a little bit too confusing and involved for a Wikipedia article which is only about a location and not the book. Therefore I suggest leaving out all details of what Gerty did and leaving it as I have re-written it: 
"later the same day, Leopold Bloom sits on a rock and watches while young Gertie lifts her skirt as Bloom masturbates."
I feel this is enough for the casual browser and satisfies Joyce fans who will discover that the whole thing was Bloom's erotic fantasy if they read the episode and have ALL their wits about them. Writing the article this way also does something to explain the next sentence about why exactly this chapter was SO bad (a middle aged man masturbating in public over a possibly under-age girl) to have the book banned. Is this ok for everyone? Shane.Bell (talk) 08:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What DID Gerty do?