Talk:List of mathematics journals

message: There is an RfC regarding the standardization of journal lists names. Please comment at Talk:Lists of journals#RFC. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 01:39, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Talk:Lists of journals#RFC|RfC on journal list names]]

message: Looking at the Topology and its Applications article, I created Journal of Symbolic Logic. One different thing about that journal is that they do not have a lead editor (they do have a coordinating editor, but that's quite different - for example his name is not at the top of the masthead, it's just alphabetical with all the other editors on the cover).  This journal also is on JStor, so I added that link to the infobox. 
If there is any more information that I should have included in the JSL article, please let me know (or edit the article, and I'll see it). I think that these stubs are getting much better thanks to the help from several other editors. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:30, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *This looks fine to me. It is a good stub. I also notice that you filled in the infobox. I think that is helpful. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 16:16, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another try: JSL 

message: I made a list of all journals that were either linked from this page or in :Category:Mathematics journals. I sorted those and double checked the redlinks to make sure that they correspond to a journal that does have an impact factor.  I removed redlinks to journals that had no impact factor, particularly those that are in the "C" ratings of the Australian Math Society  (that combination says "not notable" to me).  There were one or two unclear cases that I left and will figure out when I am creating stubs.  I updated this page with the pruned list today.
I am still working on creating the articles for the redlinks here. It takes time to make good stubs, but I expect to be done by the end of the month. So, soon, all the redlinks here will be blue.  Of course, if the goal is to get rid of the redlinks Right Away then I can just create microstubs for them.  But it seems like it would be better to take the time to create better stubs even if it takes a little time. — Carl (CBM · talk) 15:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *Carl, Headbomb is saying that he is removing links that are not going to make the cut. A month is an acceptable amount of time for the other journals. ---- Steve Quinn (talk) 02:13, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh? Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 02:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No worries. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:35, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up 2011-02-01 

message: I am suggesting that the mathematics education journal list be merged into this one, because it has only 6 good links which are repeated in this list. The sea of redlinks should be on the WikiProject's "articles requested page", not a mainspace list article. --Funandtrvl (talk) 14:59, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Then why does the first paragraph of WP:REDLINK say that: "rather than using red links in lists, disambiguation pages or templates as an article creation guide, editors are encouraged to write the article first, ..."? There could be a section on this list pg for the math ed journals, then the redlinks could/should be moved to a project page where requested articles are listed. Albeit, there are a lot of redlinked lists out there, but according to the WP editing guideline, it's not recommended. --Funandtrvl (talk) 16:37, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: *On second thought, I agree with Headbomb. Perhaps there is a list of education journals that this could go to. Once the redlinks would be removed, preciously few are left for a stand alone list. I'm guessing that most redlinks are non-notable journals, but I may be wrong there. --Crusio (talk) 17:03, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is not a list of education journals, but maybe the math ed journals should be redirected to (and incorporated into) a section of the mathematics education article, since there are only 6 links? --Funandtrvl (talk • contribs) 17:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger of [[List of mathematics education journals]] into this list 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on List of mathematics journals. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150612143042/http://www.arc.gov.au/era/era_2010/archive/era_journal_list.htm to http://www.arc.gov.au/era/era_2010/archive/era_journal_list.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:35, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Should this section be deleted as it is out of date and no longer supported? --Bduke (talk) 11:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Australian Mathematical Society ranking