Talk:Barthélemy d'Eyck

message: How can a tryptych be divided between four museums? Rmhermen 16:59, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: This edit changes the cite style. According to WP:CITEVAR citation changes require consensus. I have this watchlisted and I've spent money on and downloaded sources for Netherlandish miniature painters - was preparing to get to this set of article shortly. I'd prefer not to work with templates. According to WP:CITEVAR editors should defer to the first major contributor. I'm assuming from the contribs that's Johnbod. Opinions? Truthkeeper (talk) 22:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've reverted your 2nd thoughts removal of this, and will revert the changes. I've come to take a hard line on cite-banditry like this; I'm now prevented from working more on other articles of mine because I'd didn't spot a change of cite style before it was too late. If whoever did it feels like whining about this, I suggest you read Talk:Ancient Roman pottery and Talk:Burford Methodist Church first. Johnbod (talk) 02:32, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks Johnbod, I was thinking about re-reverting myself. I do have sources I've downloaded on these painters and am hoping  to add to some of these pages - though this is in nice shape. There's really no reason at all to change the citation style. Truthkeeper (talk) 02:36, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually I can't now see when the changes were made, so where to revert to. Can you spot it? But most of the refs were originally done by me in meat & potatos style & can be retrieved from the history. Feel very free to go back to that - I have it watchlisted. Johnbod (talk) 02:41, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: It's this edit with the cite templates added and a template to format a note. Probably better for you to take care of it w/ a copy/paste or maybe it can be undone. I don't think the page has been edited since. Truthkeeper (talk) 02:45, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, done that, but other unauthorised cite templates were added earlier as well. The sf ones are especially objectionable. Johnbod (talk) 02:51, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: They are. I can look - she edited minutes after I'd edited so I noticed the most recent edit because it popped right up on my watchlist.  Truthkeeper (talk) 02:56, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That's very odd - before this edit there aren't any cite templates and then after there are but I don't see them being added in these diffs. But that's were it had to have happened. Truthkeeper (talk) 03:03, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The one at note 2 goes back to 2009 at least. Johnbod (talk) 14:58, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation changes?

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Barthélemy d'Eyck. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080416103312/http://xv.kikirpa.be:80/database/MASTERS/M-Aix.htm to http://xv.kikirpa.be/database/MASTERS/M-Aix.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified