lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Man with the Golden Gun (novel)

message: I see someone put the tag on the article but it's not discussed here.  I agree the film section should be split off onto it's own wiki article.  That's the standard around here, ie- The Godfather. --TheTruthiness 17:12, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Most of the discussion on this is being centralized at Thunderball where there is a consensus to split. K1Bond007 17:25, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: "The Man with the Golden Gun is the thirteenth (counting the short story collection For Your Eyes Only) and final James Bond novel"
This line is confusing. Golden Gun is the thirteenth book, but it's only the twelfth novel. You can't count FYEO here because 1. It's not a novel, and 2. You'd then have to count O&TLD therefore confusing the point even further about this being the final Fleming Bond novel. So either we go back and re-number every novel post FYEO or we change the word novel to book in all articles post FYEO with special mention here that this is the final 'novel'. The latter is probably the better idea. But regardless this sentence cannot remain. K1Bond007 00:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening sentence

message: I have placed this article on hold because I feel these issues need to be addressed:
*There needs to be a section titled critical reception or something similar to show what critics felt about the book. This is needed to fulfill the broadness criterion. 
** Corrected one section so as to include all of it.  Vikrant Phadkay 15:27, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Passed as issues were met. Congratulations. T Rex | talk 16:56, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GA on Hold
Talk:Stan Rogers

message: There seem to be hundreds of photos of Rogers all over the web.
Can one be found to go with this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.249 (talk) 23:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: "Rogers was one of the passengers still on the plane at the time of the fire. His ashes were scattered..." reads, unfortunately, as though he was burned to ashes on the plane, and scattered from there. Can anyone add details of where and when his actual cremation took place? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:30, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cremation 

message: I noticed that his age at death is shown in his info box as 33, clearly 1949 to 1983 should be 53.  I changed it in the article body, and made some corrections in the template (missing spaces) but the infobox STILL shows 33.  Not sure how to fix it. JamesG5 (talk) 06:21, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  You need to check your arithmetic I'm afraid; 33 is correct. 53 years after 1949 would be in the 21st century.  I've reverted the article.  Wham2001 (talk) 10:37, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right.  That's what I get for editing in the middle of the night. JamesG5 (talk) 19:53, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in death age
Talk:Jackie Lynn Taylor

message: Jackie Lynn Taylor was born June 29, 1925.  Her current website address is:  www.rascalandUSA.com
Jack Fries, 03:34, 1 Jan 2006 
--b. Touch 03:08, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dominion of New England

message: Could this article be reviewed for C-class?  I think it could make it... DCI2026 22:56, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  C-class 

message: I have two questions regarding the governance of the dominion after Andros's overthrow.
* Was Francis Nicholson effectively governor of the dominion during the brief period between the Boston revolt and Leisler's uprising?
* Or would dominion secretary Edward Randolph, safe for a time on Castle Island, have become something of a de facto governor?  
DCItalk 17:36, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the correct way to look at this is that Andros continued to be de jure governor (he certainly tried to communicate with Nicholson), but that the dominion had de facto ceased to exist after the Boston revolt. Magic♪piano 16:54, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, thanks.  DCItalk 21:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions 

message: I do not believe that the flag shown on this page was actually used by the Dominion of New England. If I'm not mistaken, that is an alternate version of the Bunker Hill flag (the other version has a blue field instead of red) raised during the American Revolution a century after the Dominion of New England ceased to exist. Given that the wiki article on the Dominion of New England doesn't say anything about this (or any other) flag being used, I think this image should be removed from the page until someone can verify that it was in fact used by the Dominion of New England. Nsfreeman (talk) 16:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: agreed. I removed it. Rjensen (talk) 15:51, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Flag 

message: "formally without a charter" ? That shouldn't be "informally"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sadsaque (talk • contribs) 05:23, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  grammar
Talk:Lynchburg, Tennessee

message: What was the population in 2000, 5740 or 5750?  The page says both.
I only know the population as 361. ;)
In the 2010 census, TN - Moore County - Census Tract 9302 - Block Group 2 had a total population of 729. I believe this is more representative of Lynchburg than the total population of Metropolitan Lynchburg-Moore County as currently used in the article. An alternative is to use Commissioner District 1, which has a 2017 estimated population of 1,186. Jack N. Stock (talk) 17:56, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: any explanation for the 600% pop inc in 1990? 2A04:4A43:58DF:CEF2:84F0:E101:9016:15D0 (talk) 02:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Population

message: I think the law that prevents Lynchburg from voting wet is TCA 57-3-106. Look it up at http://www.michie.com/tennessee/lpext.dll?f=templates&fn=main-h.htm&cp= --Orlady (talk) 22:07, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been asked to comment here on whether this is still valid. As the person who posted on my talk page noted, the link I provided over 4 years ago no longer works; the Tennessee code is now freely accessible at http://www.lexisnexis.com/hottopics/tncode/ . The law at 57-3-106 was amended in 2011, but most provisions are not changed. Eligibility to vote on local sales of alcoholic beverages is restricted for certain counties and municipalities. Those counties and municipalities are not named in the statute, but are identified based on their population in the 1950, 1960, or 1970 census. A curious person could find the populations of Lynchburg and Moore County in those censuses and compare them to the numbers given in the law. --Orlady (talk) 20:12, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Law on alcoholic beverages
Talk:Charley Patton

message: Is the historical marker literally "on" his grave? Change to "at his grave site"? Seems weird to me that a marker would be placed on a grave. Jwicklatz (talk) 01:24, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. Fixed. Confirmed via https://medium.com/@MoresJeff/the-blues-came-walkin-like-a-man-6b85f8cd35c1 ★NealMcB★ (talk) 22:54, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical marker
Talk:Attachment parenting/Archive 1

message: This article is not NPOV. All the criticisms have now been read to be misunderstading AP rather than being valid criticism. Kevin Rector 22:48, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
:If there are any valid criticisms then you should indeed include them in this article. --jonasaurus 21:36, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV

message: The criticism is extremely short and timid, yet the response to criticism is volumnous. This entry is supposedly about a philosophy, but does not contain links to philosophy concepts such as the Naturalistic fallacy. This entry is about a concept supposedly grounded in scientific evidence, yet does not reference examples of such, or mention any controversial aspects. --jakethebluespruce 14:03, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If you look at the edits, criticism has slowly been edited out and replaced by rebuttal.  Perhaps you can find some in the article text from three months ago or so.   -Ben 01:35, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: AP doesn't need to use naturalistic fallacy. Attachment theory is grounded in fact. However, many AP proponents often emphasize "natural" approaches in other areas of their life and may even cite that as a reason to do AP. This is more of how people apply AP in their own lives than a reflection of the actual parenting theory. --Westendgirl 06:57, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See #Response to criticism removed, below.  Joie de Vivre 16:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (It is now on the main page.  If it is archived it will be moved to archive 2.)  Joie de Vivre 16:46, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism vs. Response to Criticism 

message: Crticizing AP because this method of parenting may be too demanding on the parent(s) is a little selfish.  Parenting in itself is demanding reguardless of the method.  Having unrealistic expectations and being uneducated about the stage of your child's development and their physical and emotional capabilities will cause parenting to be equally if not more demanding than AP. Don't you agree that a happy and emotionally healthy and stable child is worth the demands of parenting? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.136.26.235 (talk • contribs). 
 
:Maybe -- actually I think it reasonable for parents to weigh the demands of different methodologies if they're unconvinced one is better than another in outcome -- but it's really not relevant whether a criticism is valid or not for the purposes of this article.  What is relevant is whether a criticism is actually made, and by whom, and whether the article represents that criticism accurately.  The same applies to responses to criticsm: if you or I regard a criticism as silly for reason X, that has no place in the article if (identifiable, citable) advocates of AP rebut the criticism for reason Y. -Ben 05:09, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Just a reminder: Wikipedia talk pages are not discussion forums for the topic of the article.  They are places to discuss improvements to the article itself.  Joie de Vivre 16:34, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism
Talk:Jack Coe

message: Concise information about Jack Coe is hard to come by.  Information about his Revival center, his orphanage, and his magazine is not readily available-but I am sure it's available somewhere. It will be interesting to see what information others can add to this article.
I lived in his orphanage for 2 years, between the ages of 7 and 9 years. I am looking for more information about the home. 
I can tell report that Juanita remarried. She was married when I was there, to an evangelist and her son, Jack Jr and his wife Freda lived on the grounds of the orphanage, with their twins - Jack and Jill. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.160.212.178 (talk • contribs)  03:31, 5 December 2004 
: Self-published material isn't WP:RS. Newspapers, on the other hand, are. You can search the archives at http://news.google.com/archivesearch . Tgreach (talk) 04:40, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Information

message: Harrell and Robins are pretty general in their scope, and are secondary sources. This article needs more primary source material. The article is far too dependent on secondary sources. 
Regarding the comment by another editor that good source material regarding Coe isn't available, this simply isn't true. Extensive materials are easily accessible, and include videos of his television programs, copies of books and booklets by Coe and his wife, and coverage in the Voice of Healing magazine.
Mtnbuilder (talk) 13:16, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Better sources needed 
Talk:Teen Girl Squad

message: I'm a big fan of Homestar Runner and I personally find the Teen Girl Squad cartoons to be hilarious, but do we really need a Wikipedia article for this?  This sort of article has me questioning what the role of Wikipedia is.  I don't believe this project is designed to include a blow-by-blow account of every online cartoon ever created.  Though technically well-written, this article is anything but encyclopedic.
I think articles concerning topics of the scope of Harry Potter, for instance, are justified due to both the appreciable impact of the series on society and the author(s) discussing the significance of the series as a phenomenon and literary work, rather than merely relating the events of the plots.  However, I do not believe that something of this nature qualifies for an encyclopedia article.  If we allowed this to go through, then Wikipedia would soon be littered with articles that would be little more than plot synposes of obscure items of interest.
Furthermore, this article only informs the reader of the plots of a silly cartoon series, which they could easily discover by simply watching it.  Because of this, I think it's hard to argue that this article is doing anything more than promoting the Homestar Runner Website, which is fine to do, but this is the wrong place to do it (it violates Wikipedia's terms of use).  I hesitate to vote to delete this because I am relatively new here and not really involved in contributing to the community so much.  For all I know, this may be a perfectly legitimate and acceptable article.  If anyone feels like they could debate the merits of including this article, I hope they use this opportunity to do so.  Otherwise, I humbly submit the decision of whether or not to retain it to the community.
:Most of this article should be hacked out and left to the Homestar Runner Wiki. A listing of all the easter eggs is definitely more appropriate there than here. -- Cyrius|✎ 05:50, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

message: As I am a new user and cannot move pages, please change "What's Her Face" into a disambiguation page. It conflicts with the name of a doll line. Alcy 07:57, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect conflict 

message: I added the info for Issue #11. It was released July 17, 2006. KdogDS 19:01, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue #11 

message: how do i change that so it shows all eleven issues? It should be this:  KdogDS 18:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture of title page

message: Read the heading. --Addict 2006 06:33, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do: pictures of characters with <nowiki>{{web-screenshot}}</nowiki> tags
Talk:Boeotia Prefecture

message: Shouldn't this info be on the Boeotia page, and the info there be edited and moved further down as historial information? Aggelophoros 03:41, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge with "Boeotia" is one option, moving this article to "Boeotia Prefecture" is also an option. Anyway "Viotia" is not the official transliteration, but the one proposed by the US Board of Geographic Names. Official would be "Voiotia". Reactions at Talk:Prefectures of Greece please. Markussep 13:06, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Esperanto/Archive 2

message: I've corrected and made more consistent the pronunciation models given in the "Examples" section - altering some of them back to what they were before an edit on 26 July.
The anonymous contributor then added a useful explanation at the beginning, but at the same time put in the words "dole", "cone" and "tone" as guides to some of the syllables.
It may be that in parts of the US (and perhaps in northern England) these words do indicate the correct pronunciation of the Esperanto "o"; but in southern England they certainly don't - they imply a rather ugly dipthong all too common as a mispronunciation among English-speaking beginners (and some long-standing E-ists!) --Tiffer 21:45, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation
Talk:Esperanto/Archive 3

message: I created the Lernu! article (pretty much parallels the one at the Esperanto Wikipedia), but I don't know how I should link this article to it. Any ideas? --cprompt 03:11, 20 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links; Slang and E-o in France 

message: Ĉu oni diskutas en E-o pri ĉi tiu temo?
Just made some changes - particularly that LLZ lived in Warsaw at the time he published La Unua Libro; but also, among others, a reference to "National Languages" to conform to an earlier use of the term "Natural Language" (for which a Wiki already exists).
For my own part, I prefer to use the term "Ethnic Language", because neither "national" (languages don't conform to state boundaries) nor "natural" (E-o seems just as natural to me as English, and certainly more so than an unfamiliar language) is satisfactory IMO.  The trouble is that there is already a page with the title "Natural language", as referred to above.  Do people see the distinction as real?  Can we change the title of the "Natural language" page? --Tiffer 20:36, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  National/Natural/Ethnic languages 

message: Really?
The reform project by Zamenhof breaks the stability.
On the other hand, some say that the reforms were planned to be so outrageous to ensure a rejection from the Esperantists.
That would break the "belongs to the Esperantists".
-- Error 00:43, 29 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Esperanto belongs to the Esperantists; Stability
Talk:'t Hooft–Polyakov monopole

message: not just SU(2) to U(1) Phys 03:42, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)

message: Technically, the "monopole problem" is not that we haven't discovered monopoles yet. The "monopole problem" instead refers to the cosmological implications of grand unification (GUTS). Since monopoles are generically on the menu in GUTS and since they are expected to be quite massive, their existence in the early universe threatens to overclose it. This was considered a "problem" with the standard big bang theory. Cosmic inflation remedies the situation by diluting any primordial abundance of magnetic monopoles (see the wikipedia cosmic inflation page for a discussion of this).- bapowellphysics 18:06, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "clarification of the "monopole problem"

message: Hi, a professor I have for a class said this monopole solution could possibly be discovered by the Large Hadron Collidor. He said the mass is approximently equal to the Mass of the W boson dived by alpha (fine structure constant) ~10TeV. However, I'm not an expert, and I haven't been able to find any sources to back up this claim. I did find out that there is indeed a dedicated monopole detection experiment at the LHC (see the info at MoEDAL_experiment). I think it would be very useful if someone could write a section about experimental searches for this monopole. Regards Danski14(talk) 23:01, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass  / experimental search ???
Talk:Conker's Bad Fur Day

message: Lotsa previously unknown stuff here: https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2019-05-24-conkers-bad-fur-day-designer-shares-new-details-on-the-planned-sequel-that-never-was JOEBRO64 02:07, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New ''Other Bad Day'' info 

message: Should we add in Xbox as one of the game's platforms in the infobox? GeekFreak98 (talk) 19:49, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You're either thinking of Conker: Live & Reloaded or Rare Replay, so no. -Vipz (talk) 11:37, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Platforms
Talk:Dominique Jean Larrey

message: Is there any more detail available about this person?  If not, maybe it might be better to redirect to Triage  Joyous 05:40, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)
:Article has been expanded, but makes no mention of triage - was Larrey the individual responsible for this system? Drutt 18:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This should be as detailed an article as any on Wikipedia. Add and feature. A remarkable person. 41.241.23.113 (talk) 19:59, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

text: I've put the references in a scroll-box. Drutt (talk) 21:55, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The second graphic, beneath the portrait of Dominique Jean Larrey is misidentified. The photograph is of his son, Hipolyte Larrey, although it bears his father's signature. The source of the photograph is the online collection of the National Library of Medicine (NLM). I contacted the NLM and after a couple of emails, they figured out that theirs was also misidentified. They have corrected the identification of the photograph (B016992). It is now identified as Hippolyte Larrey. I you open the link back to the photograph at NLM, it now says that the photograph is of Hippolyte Larrey. How do we go about either editing the identification of the photograph on the article or removing it?Med.history.buff (talk) 16:44, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misidentification of Photograph 
Talk:Roy E. Disney

message: Seems to be a ton of missing information about Roy's background as a nature documentary producer, working with Jack Webb on Dragnet productions, etc., as espoused in his Television Academy Foundation interview: https://interviews.televisionacademy.com/interviews/roy-e-disney Indieshack (talk) 14:50, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing information about Roy's background as a filmmaker
Talk:China Netcom

message: cnc-noc.net is discussed in many forums as a source of spam, e.g. SpamCop Discussion: The never ending story cnc-noc.net, but forums are not WP:reliable sources. Additional authoritative sources would be welcome. - Fayenatic (talk) 17:32, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complaints about spam 
Talk:MP3 blog

message: I have been hearing about PodCasting (a play on Broadcasting using an IPod or other MP3 player for playback).
http://www.podcasters.org or 
http://ipodder.org
What i can't seem to find out is:
1. what are the tools that are need?
2. how are they to be hosted?
3. how do you enbed the RSS?
4. anything else that i would need to know...?
:Check out the Podcasting article for useful links.  BanyanTree 14:43, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Does audioblogging include blogging by voice or speech recordings? Weblog#Audio implies that it does. Add to article? -- Chris Wood 21:18, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: The phrase "MP3 Blog" is generally used in connection with music, specifically.  Podcasting is where you want to look. Dilvie 03:33, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

text: I agree with you, but it does reflect the views held by most MP3 bloggers.  I would welcome more balanced wording. Dilvie 05:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice/Speech? 

message: It has been suggested that this article be merged with "audioblogging".  I disagree strongly for two reasons:  First, the term "audioblog" is hardly used anymore, since the more popular term "podcast" took off near the end of 2004.  If anything, both "audioblogging" and MP3 blog articles should be merged into the podcast article.  However, I think that this article has the potential to discuss important MP3 blog issues such as copyright, and new marketing channels in much better depth if the articles remain separate.  We should put the suggestion to rest. Dilvie 05:23, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Audioblogging / MP3 Blog Merge 

message: Added The Hype Machine to external links (nothing worse than having a ref to a web site and not being able to either go to the wiki artical, or the site, directly.  Could also make the ref in the main part of the artical the exteranl link - but thought this was best.Ward99  —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 21:59, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Hype Machine - Ext. Ref 

message: Some of the links given on mp3 blogs, as aggregated by the Hype Machine, link to original songs. What is the legal status of such? Some info might be given in the article. 139.179.137.234 (talk) 21:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legal status
Talk:Ewe music

message: I get it that, most probably, Je Je Kule (aka Che Che Colé) is the best known Ewe song outside of Africa (particularly because of Willie Colón's adaptation of the song from the early 1970's and because of its use as a children's song in various compilation records. Is there an "official" set of lyrics for that song? Can it be at least mentioned here, with some background info?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.64.0.254 (talk) 12:56, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Je Je Kule 