lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Esteban Ayala Ferrer

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the 
Cuban artists checklist 
and update it with any changes that you make to this article 
... Happy Editing! —72.75.72.63 (talk) 23:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Esterio Segura Mora

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the 
"Cuban artists" checklist 
and update it with any changes that you make to this article 
... Happy Editing! —72.75.72.63 (talk) 06:01, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Samuel Feijóo

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:41, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have changed the References section to External links, because that's all they are ... they are not reliable source citations that demonstrate "significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject" (WP:BIO) ... nonetheless, I have replaced the URLs with  tags, and used  to replace a URL provided by Some Other Editor.
Happy Editing! — 21:04, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "References" 

message: Two of the "External Links" are from Cuban government web pages.. I would think that a government web page would be considered a reliable source.. And if they are a reliable source then the person in question is NOTABLE. Callelinea (talk) 02:22, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok works for me. MBisanz talk 02:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: "Curiouser and curiouser," said Alice ... I had trouble accessing URLs for Cuban websites the other day, but I can access these Just Fine ... if I can remember the other articles where I had a revert war with Some Other Editor, then I'll "make 'em pretty" like this one (if they haven't been already :-) ... Happy Editing! — 04:01, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cuban websites
Talk:Jesse A. Fernández

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:42, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 20#Category:Cuban contemporary artists, and do not add links to www.cubancontemporaryart.com again to this or other articles. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 05:41, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand what you guys were arguing about but by looking at the catched spot, which is what my URL was it showed the direct page linking to that article without going through the home page.  My link was not to www.cubancontemporaryart.com but to www.cubancontemporaryart.com/modules/vgalleryii/index.php?pa=viewautorida&arch=1&codigo=196 . Callelinea (talk) 05:59, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  The bot went through and deleted all links to that base URL (cubancontemporaryart.com), as it is not a WP:RS site, and it's primary function is selling works of art, which makes it WP:LINKSPAM ... also, it violates Links normally to be avoided because it requires registration for full access ... that was the Consensus. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 06:14, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linkspam 
Talk:Fernando Díaz Domínguez

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the Cuban artists checklist and update it with any changes that you make to this article ... Happy Editing! — 06:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Gilberto Andrés Romero Pino

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: OK, it looks like a DHS geographic roadblock to accessing the cite (see Talk:Agustín Cárdenas Alfonso) ... please format the EL using the  template ... you can use some of the other articles as examples ... whenever possible, use the <title> from the HTML file for the Web page (assuming you're an HTML newbie):
# from your Web browser's menu, View | Page source
# search for the HTML <title> tag
# copy the text up to the </title> end tag
Using http://www.waterholes.com/~dennette/1996/hopper/bug.htm for an example, we examine the HTML source file, and can make:

That produces:
:
Note: by using ISO 8601 date format (YYYY-MM-DD), the MediaWiki software can automagically create links to the year and date articles ... it also avoids 02/04/08 confusion. :-)
Note: the |work= will add the italics, and if the source publication has an article (e.g.. The New York Times for nytimes.com), then place it in  so that it will be linked ... you'll have to research whether or not a Spanish language publication like El Nuevo Herald has an article.
Even though I don't read Spanish, I can take "by Jose Padilla" and make:
:|first= Jose |last= Padilla
This will get displayed as Padilla, Jose in the appropriate position in the citation.
Just read the :Template:Cite web and :Template:Cite news documentation (for published articles/reviews without Web versions), and you'll figure out what else you can use ... BTW, I've never used it myself, but there's a  template.
Happy Editing! —72.75.72.63 (talk) 16:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Please format the link
Talk:Taillear Dubh na Tuaighe

message: "('Taillear Dubh na Tuaighe')" is one fugly disambiguation.  Surely there's a more elegant way of putting that? Jpatokal (talk) 08:33, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parentheses 

message: Gaelic discriptive names that are colours almost always refer to hair colour and since the principal families of the Camerons were well known for having black hair I think this should be changed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scotaidh (talk • contribs) 09:56, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubh
Talk:Grupo Antillano

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:46, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the 
Cuban artists checklist 
and update it with any changes that you make to this article 
... Happy Editing! —72.75.72.63 (talk) 18:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I had some time to kill, so I put some lipstick on this pig ... added  templates for the references ... Happy Editing! —  23:20, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Hilda Vidal Valdés

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:47, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, the first external link you added was the original spam link that was removed? MBisanz talk 04:40, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it is, and I have removed it ...  see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 20#Category:Cuban contemporary artists. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 05:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Hugo Consuegra

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the Cuban artists checklist and update it with any changes that you make to this article ... Happy Editing! — 05:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Manuel Vidal Fernández

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the Cuban artists checklist and update it with any changes that you make to this article ... Happy Editing! — 05:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Vicente Dopico Lerner

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:50, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see Self-published sources ... a subject's own website is  not Verifiable, and hence a link to it cannot be used to establish Notability. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 04:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links are not [[WP:RS]]
Talk:Sandra Amelia Ceballos Obaya

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:54, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Saidel Brito Lorenzo

message: In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for , or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation. 
Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice: This article lacks [[WP:A]] to establish {{ #switch: {{lc:Biographies}}
| academics = [[WP:PROF]]
| biographies = [[WP:BIO]]
| people = [[WP:BIO]]
| companies = [[WP:CORP]]
| groups = [[WP:CORP]]
| fiction = [[WP:FICTION]]
| music = [[WP:MUSIC]]
| schools = [[WP:SCL]]
| web = [[WP:WEB]]
| proposed = [[WP:N]]}}

message: Please see the 
Cuban artists checklist 
for background information, and please update it with any changes that you make to this article 
... Happy Editing! —72.75.72.63 (talk) 16:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:List of foreign Ukrainian Premier League players

message: The list should have past and present players Matthew_hk tc 08:55, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Roger Aguilar Labrada

message: In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for , or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation. 
Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Added external links. Will be working on it this month.Callelinea (talk) 20:38, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notice: This article lacks [[WP:A]] to establish {{ #switch: {{lc:Biographies}}
| academics = [[WP:PROF]]
| biographies = [[WP:BIO]]
| people = [[WP:BIO]]
| companies = [[WP:CORP]]
| groups = [[WP:CORP]]
| fiction = [[WP:FICTION]]
| music = [[WP:MUSIC]]
| schools = [[WP:SCL]]
| web = [[WP:WEB]]
| proposed = [[WP:N]]}}
Talk:Roberto Juan Diago Querol

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Roberto Álvarez Ríos

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 08:58, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see the 
Cuban artists checklist 
and update it with any changes that you make to this article 
... Happy Editing! —72.75.72.63 (talk) 17:12, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup needed
Talk:Rigoberto Romero Carmona

message: Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I am nonetheless willing to assist User:, and other recent contributors to this article, to make constructive improvements to it ... I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. —72.75.72.63 (talk) 09:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: External links added will edit article later.Callelinea (talk) 23:00, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled