lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Volcano Suns

message: As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this review of Merge's reissues of Volcano Suns' The Bright Orange Years and All-Night Lotus Party. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the review and—if he or she sees fit—post it as an external link here or, if pages are created for either of the albums, to the professional reviews section on either/both of those pages. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! (favorable) Mike harkin (talk) 18:41, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link / professional review suggestion
Talk:Hollywood Casino Amphitheatre (Maryland Heights, Missouri)

message: The part about the riot was removed because it is not true.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.30.22.141 (talk) 18:22:27, August 19, 2007 (UTC) 
: Re-added the line about the Guns n' Roses riot, because it's a documented fact.  It made national news at the time.  24.5.146.221 (talk) 06:28, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: They changed their name again???  Wow.  DaronDierkes (talk) 06:14, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: No consensus even after repeated relisting (non-admin closure) BegbertBiggs (talk) 20:57, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hollywood Casino Amphitheatre (Maryland Heights, Missouri) →  – common name of a venue frequently name-changed due to naming rights sales. Venue has had 4 names in its existence, already required 1 move since the page was created due to naming rights sale (another would have been required if the page had been created a year earlier). There's every sign that it's going to change again in the next few years. Significant coverage, including the venue's own page, references it as "the former Riverport Amphitheatre" - suggesting that's a more useful identifier than the current name which will eventually need moved anyway to keep current. Darker Dreams (talk) 06:59, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

text: @Robertsky thank you for letting me know. I have moved it back to the original title and have opened and relisted this request. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 03:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Raydann Thank you! – robertsky (talk) 04:04, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject St. Louis has been notified of this discussion.  ASUKITE 19:45, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Missouri has been notified of this discussion.  ASUKITE 19:45, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: Looks like this was procedurally relisted, second relist to garner possible replies from involved projects  ASUKITE 19:46, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 September 2023
Talk:Pseudodysphagia

message: What is the difference between pseudodysphagia and phagophobia, they seem very similar if not identical to me.Nikolaih☎️📖 22:45, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Phagophobia]] difference? 

message: I just finished cleaning up the references on the page (for the most part). There’s a few things I have to note:
# A previous editor skirted the spam blacklist for Verywellmind by removing the d from the URL in the citation. Caught this on accident. Given this is probably only my second time dealing with references (I usually only fix grammar/spelling issues), I’m not sure how this should be handled. The discussion on this source is at MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/April_2020#Verywell. I did read that URLs can be requested to be manually whitelisted, but I’m not sure if that applies to this instance.
# I added in multiple missing citations that were referenced in the article. I might remove some of those warnings after this post, if they’re good now. Likewise, there were some citation needed warnings as well, but all the referenced text appears to reference those citations I added. I might remove those as well if necessary.
# There’s a Whitehead & Schuster 1985 citation, and a Whitehead & Schuster 1958 citation right beneath. I tried searching online for the 1958 study (and added the 1985 study which I did find), but couldn’t find it. Given the years are 1985 and 1958, I’m fairly certain the editor who added them just transposed the digits. I’m not going to alter the reference and remove the warning, just in case someone else after me can find it. Feel free to copy the citation over if you think it’s fine to. I'll move it to the reflist so it can be referenced by name in a bit just in case.
# The other references at the bottom were not explicitly referenced in the text. Given I really don’t know how to access these online (and really don’t have the time to right now), I’m not sure where to place the ref tags in the article. Perhaps, later, another editor can help deal with this.
This is really my first time cleaning up references on a larger scale, and the first time I’ve changed the ref style from a deprecated style like parenthetical citations. I’m fairly certain I did it right, but feel free to let me know if I didn’t. I’d like to fix more references and whatnot on other articles in the future, so that would help a lot.
Happy Halloween. EmptySora (talk) 20:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  References cleanup
Talk:Hans Burkhardt

message: Various unsourced statements that sound like original research are present.  A few references can't hurt.  x42bn6 Talk Mess 19:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:The Face (magazine)

message: A user suggested on here, apparently as a result of inside information, that The Face may be relaunched as a brand within the next couple of years. Thisisnotapipe | Message 02:37, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

message: Not really sure what the compunction was to move the article from The Face (magazine) to The Face magazine, but I feel that more has been lost than gained (primarily in the disamb page where the italics are no longer available and so it no longer displays like a title). danno_uk 01:54, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move
Talk:Helium (band)

message: A lot of the lead could be included in the discography.  Anyone have any feelings on incorporating it there? Dreambeaver (talk) 21:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have re-placed most of the Lead section into other, new sections. See what you think.--Soulparadox 15:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography 
Talk:House of the Blackheads (Riga)

message: Shouldn't this have english name, like House of Blackheads ? It's just that I remember some guideline stating that one should choose most popular english naming for the title rather than the native -- Xil/talk 17:23, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're correct. Just fixed it. --Philaweb T-C 18:33, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: English Name

message: This building should be put under the heading of a new category named replica buildings (see Talk:St Mark's Campanile). Robert Schediwy (Vienna) 84.112.54.160 (talk) 14:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Replica Building

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:House of Blackheads at Dusk 3, Riga, Latvia - Diliff.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on August 18, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-08-18. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:55, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:House of Blackheads at Dusk 3, Riga, Latvia - Diliff.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon
Talk:Rocket from the Crypt

message: The name of this group is too similar to the original name of the Dead Boys - Rocket from the Tombs - to be a coincidence IMO. Perhaps a future update or edit to the article could address this.208.32.173.71 16:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the first paragraph of the "Band History" section, titled "Formation." They based the RFTC name on RFTT. --IllaZilla 20:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Band name

message: This song was one that featured in Crank, but I am intrigued as to why it has no mention here in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.182.106.211 (talk • contribs) 07:03, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think "featured" is a stretch...it was just used in the soundtrack, along with a number of other songs by other artists. It's not like it was written specifically for the film (a la "I Don't Want to Miss a Thing"). Anyway, I don't think it's really pertinent to any of the sections currently in the article. After all, the movie came out 4 years after the album (Live from Camp X-Ray, which "Bring Us Bullets" is from) and almost a year after the band broke up, so it's not like it adds to their notability in any way. Plenty of their songs were used on compilations, etc. but mentioning this is little more than trivia. If it did bear mentioning, I think it'd be much more appropriate to mention it in the Live from Camp X-Ray article rather than the main article on the band. You'd just have to cite a reliable source, such as the soundtrack listing on IMDb or somesuch. --IllaZilla (talk) 08:54, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: No mention of 'Bring Us Bullets'?
Talk:TBWA Worldwide

message: “Disruption is seen to be an important part of TBWA\'s DNA and has evolved in many markets to a separate company called the "Disruption consultancy".”
This reads like an advert. In fact, the whole article reads like PR. Nevalicori 19:59, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Complaint

message: So sad to see this weak article as the destination of a redirect from Chiat/Day. --Intenionally unsigned  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.175.18.130 (talk) 00:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So... write something about Chiat\Day? Greyfedora (talk) 01:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crappy article doesn't do justice to Chiat/Day 

message: Do we need so many redlinks here? If there are no objections, I'm going to unlink them. --FeldBum (talk) 04:48, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agencies and multihub creative networks
Talk:Irish Football League

message: I am planning on creating an article for a List of former Irish Football League clubs in line with similar articles on the Scottish and English leagues, but I will wait till the current reorganisation is complete. I think there should probably be seperate articles for the Irish Football League and the League of Ireland rather than just a generic list of former clubs for all of Ireland. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 00:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: List of former Irish Football League clubs
Talk:Northern Ireland Football League Cup

message: Considering most of the finals are played in December, I think it would be better to acknowledge this. For example, the '2005/06' final was played in December 2005, meaning no matches were actually played in 2006 at all. This is kind of similar to the English Charity Shield where the match played in August 2007 is the 2007 edition and not the 07/08 one. So, should we rename the seasons here to fit in with the actual calendar years alone?
I know the '2007/08' final will be played in 2008 but this is only due to special circumstances.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.29.210.147 (talk) 13:51, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Competitions are organised by season, not by calendar year. Mooretwin (talk) 12:23, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Years/seasons
Talk:Monument to the Liberators of Soviet Latvia and Riga from the German Fascist Invaders

message: Correctly it has to be called "Victory memorial to THE Soviet Army". please correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.201.68.86 (talk) 15:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:The Softies

message: "The band partook on a few tours throughout their union, including as an opening act for singer/songwriter Elliott Smith."
I don't know about that.  Every time I saw a Smith/Softies show, Smith was the opener.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.223.12.150 (talk) 16:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I know we don't use YouTube videos as citations, but I just recently saw Rose and Jen on a YouTube video playing at a club in Brooklyn... from August 2012! And there have been quite a few other videos of The Softies are far more recent performances. --DanTD 21:46, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. They did break up, but do seem to be playing a few shows this year. I've added a line to the article about it. This tour appears just to be a one-off thing, though, so I would not say that they are back together as a band, unless we hear further. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did they really break up?
Talk:Tullycraft

message: why is neutral milk hotel related?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ultrasarah (talk • contribs) 19:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:Alcatraz03182006.jpg

message: Great stitching, however, there is a noticeable amount of JPEG artifact. SquareShot97 00:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: that, and purple halo. still, I'm not complaining, is overall a great pic. 24.205.34.217 23:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

text: Camera position looks to be about 37.80998N 122.47631W, so the Alcatraz lighthouse is 5.1 km away. Tim Zukas (talk) 20:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good
Talk:Battle of Cabin Creek

message: Should this article be split into two separate articles about each successive battle? DaltonCastle (talk) 23:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: , I believe so-- I've tagged for a proposed split-- I would Support such a proposal Eddie891  Talk Work  13:37, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

text: Support.  It's two separate incidents. Hog Farm  Bacon 13:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

text: Oppose.  While it is two separate incidents, both are fairly minor.  It is really only the weight of both that make this site worthy of preservation, and preservation is what much of the article is devoted to.</sub> 14:01, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Article split

message: I have linked each new article to the page history of this article. This page will now serve all three new articles as attribution for all edits prior to the splitting. BusterD (talk) 17:04, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have boldly split this article up per the stale discussion above
Talk:City Wall of Nanjing

message: Tong oil is mentioned in this article. Is it an error for "tung oil"? --BenjaminBarrett12 (talk) 09:17, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tong oil? 

message: The section "Today" of this article seems to be lifted directly form Within the walls of Nanking by Alice Tisdale Hobart, Macmillan (1929). Rincewind42 (talk) 13:47, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation
Talk:Vidoop

message: Due to a possible conflict of interest, I will not edit this page again or object to its deletion or modification. However, I felt that the level of notability is easily high enough to warrent inclusion in Wikipedia, with over a hundred thousand Google results. --Duplico 20:26, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Created page

message: For an information page, this seems ok. I do have concerns with stating a founder announced a fortune 500 company will be using it. That seems like pure marketing to me. In addition naming who the current advertisers are seems like extra advertising. Is this something that should be on wikipedia? 70.189.99.40 19:19, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marketing 

message: That phishing attack video is pretty stupid. It can be applied to any website. It's no different from a PayPal scam where a user gets a fake email, clicks on a link (that doesn't even go to PayPal) and enters their information. I don't think it deserves to be here. 24.199.71.191 10:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms
Talk:Hannah Sell

message: She was a member of the Labour NEC at when she was 17?! Is this correct?
Believe me, if you'd seen Hannah at 17, you wouldn't be questioning it. She must have livened up those NEC meetings! Trotboy 12:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, she was elected from the LPYS conferemce on to the NEC. --Duncan 18:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Captaincy

message: :Old talk from the article Captaincy General, before merger:
It would be better to have a single article for "Capitaincy/Capitania/Capitanía/Capitaincy-General/Capitão-Mor/etc.", and a separate one for "Capitaincies of Brazil", the latter containing what is presently at Capitania. Some redirects from the Spanish and Portuguese names to the English name would be convenient, too. FilipeS 19:00, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think you're right and I tried to merge the articles but to move them it would be necessary to make a request in a special page and the bureaucracy kept me from doing it. Dantadd 21:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

text: Merged Captaincy General and Captaincies of Brazil into the disambiguation stub Captaincy. FilipeS 11:53, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming of articles

message: In Australia and the United Kindom (Scotland), at least, I have found captaincy to pertain most to captaining a sporting team and was quite surprised when I found this article. Maybe this should be accounted for and a "not to be confused with" to be added to something of the nature of Team Captaincies.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.175.57.243 (talk) 00:24, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common use 

message: According to the article, "All but two [captaincies in Brasil] failed, according to initial expectations. The Captaincy of Pernambuco thrived thanks to the sugarcane harvest, and thus formed the basis for the Viceroyalty of Grão-Pará. The Captaincy of São Vicente obtained success through the exploration of the hinterland known as bandeiras, and was the main foundation of the Viceroyalty of Brazil (which would later become the province of São Paulo)."
No source is given. Cambridge History of Latin America confirms the unsourced text. According to it, "Only ten of the captaincies were settled in the sixteenth century; two (Ceara and Santana) were left abandoned by their lords. Of the ten that were settled only two (Sao Vicente and Pernambuco) could be termed genuinely successful before I 550. Of the remaining eight, five were moderately successful, for a time at least (Santo Amaro, Itamaraca, Espirito Santo, Porto Segura, Ilheus), while the remaining three rapidly became complete failures (Sao Tome, Maranhao-Rio Grande and Bahia)." 
The source is H. B. Johnson, “The Portuguese Settlement of Brazil, 1500-1580,” vol. 1 of The Cambridge History of Latin America, ed. Jay Parini (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984), 264. 
Sorry, but I'm not good at WikiFormating. Can someone put the above reference into the text as a footnote? Obrigado! --Lacarids (talk) 02:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  RE: "All but two failed..."
Talk:Nicolas Slonimsky

message: Currently there's a bit of trivia dropped in: "his notable students included Cynthia Tse Kimberlin." Is there a fuller list of students somewhere?  Her article just indicates he was one of many teachers of hers.  – SJ + 21:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of students?  
Talk:Aso Rock

message: Is this rock originally of volcanic origin?
How old is it?  Geo Swan (talk) 17:35, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this rock of volcanic origin?
Talk:Bureau of Public Enterprises

message: Dear Sirs,                                      Date : 4-3-2014.117.213.231.83 (talk) 14:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Right to Information, Act 2005 

message: Greek-French fashion designer. He was born January 24th, 1964, in Athens and raised in Paris, France and London, UK. Kleomenis Astor (talk) 15:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kleomenis Astor 

message: Except for a single link to another Wikipedia page, it is not even clear what this article is referring to. It should provide more context. Teacher1850 (talk) 14:41, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unclear topic
Talk:Ganiyu Adams

message: @Oluwa2Chainz: Information from this page was merged from Ganiyu Adams which you reverted edits on. This page was also redirected for easy reference. Which is more appropriate in this context? Eruditescholar (talk) 17:51, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: , this page was never merged to Gani Adams. The subject is better known as "Gani Adams" by the way. This page should be redirected to Gani Adams, not the other way. —Oluwa2Chainz »» (talk to me) 18:35, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've corrected my previous message. Notwithstanding, thanks for clarifying your edit. I'll reverse the redirection of the pages. Eruditescholar (talk) 19:05, 9 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Speedy Deletion or Expansive Merging?
Talk:Bartholomew Steer

message: Geogre: Fascinating new article. Glad to see you're still creating great content.--Alabamaboy 20:41, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you.  He's a bit early for me, generally, but I put him in the Giles Mompesson School of Jacobean Discontentedness, and reading The Making of the English Working Class is one of the pivotal moments in my life.  I had to filter out Walter's contempt a bit.  He seems to regard Steer as being tiresome for not realizing that socialism wouldn't work.  I want to read what the Cambridge fellow wrote on the subject (Adam Fox).  Geogre 21:43, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

text: OK, I think I've gnomed that into submission now, although I haven't yet ventured to move the album. Choess 01:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Oyo Empire

message: Heavens, what a shockingly poorly written edit by 80.43.2.64. No structure, full of spelling and grammar mistakes and of doubtful quality and accuracy.
--Domberlic 02:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Older comments

message: Found a nice map of the Oyo Empire on a website.  The good people there gave me permission to add it to the wiki commons.  License and everything should be straight.  You are all welcome :)Scott Free 22:17, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you very much. But I can't seem to find the year this is. Do you know about when Oyo extended as depicted in the map? Picaroon (t) 01:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The date isn't clear, but it is supposed to be the Oyo Empire at its full extent not counting tributary kingdoms like Dahomey.  This period in time would be the 18th century.  That's when Oyo was most powerful.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4shizzal (talk • contribs) 12:44, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  I give you OYO! 

message: Who move the capital of Oyo to agodoyo 102.89.2.112 (talk) 06:37, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oyo empire 

message: Identify the principle of separation of powers in the ancient oyo empire 102.89.34.146 (talk) 11:54, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Civic 

message: This segment (in the article’s first paragraph) seems a bit grand / advertise-y / non-encyclopaedic, no? — “ and rose through the outstanding organizational and administrative skills of the Yoruba people “. — Asdfjrjjj (talk) 19:42, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening section 

message: Four organs of the Oyo empire 41.190.3.42 (talk) 21:34, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:   Pre colonial
Talk:Yoruba literature

message: apeere litireso alohun maarun-unmarun-un
Ultsxfxgxhr
xxx
102.89.47.81 (talk) 19:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Litireso
Wikipedia talk:List of infoboxes/Proposed/French Communauté d'agglomération

message: Shamelessly ripped off of fr.wikipedia.
Anyone who's created userboxes before?  Help with stickin little flag, etc, into it?
T L Miles 20:50, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Any image in mind ? David Ruben  Talk  02:10, 10 July 2007 (UTC)