lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Generative music

message: How does generative music differ from algorithmic music?  They sound sufficiently similar to me that I think we should merge them, perhaps under the title algorithmic music. Comments? -- Finlay McWalter |  Talk 21:38, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
:Algorithmic music is a very broad category, encompassing computer assisted algorithmic composition (CAAC) (like M,DMix, etc), adaptive music (computer game music), interactive music (as instrument or player).  In fact it includes any algorithmic process applied to music.
:Generative music is not exactly the same, and as the various perspectives show, people from different areas use it in different ways.  Within the field of algorithmic music itself, a generative algorithm is often seen as one that creates musical data from abstract/non-musical data (and is in this sense "generating" the music from "nothing").  This definition may seem kind of vague, but is explained much more thoroughly in that paper that I referred to, which is available at:
:
:In this way a generative algorithm would be seen as distinct from transformational and analytical algorithms (all three of which are used  exensively in algorithmic music).  We put them all on a continuum in the paper I mentioned. Let me know if this makes sense.
:220.240.26.58 22:16, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Algorithmic composition

message: Thx to all for the article and discussion. As a newbie to the topic, i'd just like to suggest that the points of clarification on this talk page, once sorted out to the experts' satisfaction, should appear in the article (as a part of making it less of a list). Hope this helps, "alyosha" (talk) 19:06, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Generative vs Algorithmic 

message: What about the cgMusic program? That is surely a generative music system.
cgMusic link:  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.252.237.195 (talk) 23:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Generative Music Systems 

message: It needs to mention other software equally. Botaki (talk) 12:52, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The software section is an advertisement of a company.
Talk:Buffalo Grove, Illinois

message: Home values and income are obviously inaccurate. Somebody please correct them. Census data is 5 years old so I doubt it'll be meaninful Papushin 04:14, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There seem to be two totally different income statistics. The chart states 80,000, while the demographic section says 125,000. Which is more accurate? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.22.12.199 (talk) 00:51, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Income problem? 

message: That's a hell of an edit summary, excuse me for just going off the page, all it says is its in suburban Cook and Lake County, which means spit. Sorry if I am not from Chicago but two towns with the same name in the same state needed to be disambiguated. So save your holier-than-thou edit summaries for a forum that cares. IvoShandor 08:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I think it simply makes sense. Maybe I should just move this article, as it doesn't really receive much traffic anyways. --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 22:40, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I know this is an old comment but just to clear things up in case someone else gets confused in the future.  Buffalo Grove isn't "two towns with the same name in the same state".  Buffalo Grove is one town that straddles the county line between Lake and Cook counties so has land in both. Wolfhound668 (talk) 14:50, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ugh

message: Please do not add random people who were not born in Buffalo Grove or only briefly lived there. Removed a few. Andru nl (talk) 18:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable people 

message: The precipitation data in the climate table seems much lower than that of towns in the surrounding area. As someone from the area I doubt there is a microclimate here. 2600:1700:8412:22A0:292D:8224:E746:F722 (talk) 23:33, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Climate
Talk:Big Generator

message: I think the Chronology in the infobox should include the Anderson Bruford Wakeman Howe album, since it was and is regarded by fans as a Yes album in all but name. Lee M 02:40, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Sophtware Slump

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have had disambig links placed at the appropriate article or disambiguation page.--Hraefen Talk 20:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''
Talk:Armenian cucumber

message: Would this not be better at the lowercased name?  — Pekinensis 22:00, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 
Talk:Dick Sabot

message: This is not a copyvio; I wrote both pages. (Or, more accurately, I wrote both pages at the same time.) I can put a license notice up on the Tripod site if you like, saying it's from Wikipedia. (Or vice-versa. Regardless, I grant license for both parties to use the text.) JRP 22:02, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: If the text appears on wikipedia, it will need to be under the gfdl, so it would be more appropriate if a notice appears on the tripod site. Enochlau 11:50, 24 July 2005 (UTC)

text: If this is sourced from a Tripod page,  it should be linked as a source.   KenThomas (talk) 06:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Violation?

message: Look guys...  I do not want to disrespect Dick Sabot's memory,  more than anyone,  but, an article on the site of the company created by the subject of a the article,  is in no way a neutral source.
As a Wikipedia article and not a corporate bio,  this piece reads like a mixture of Williamstown lore and unsourced praise-- some of which may be true.  As a Wikipedia article,  written by a Tripod employee(?),  it is close to violating the autobiographical rules and violates several others in regards to neutrality.
In the end,  it violates NPOV and is highly problematic.  It needs to be reworked.  KenThomas (talk) 05:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lacks significant sourcing;  NPOV 

message: The New York Times had this article that mentioned the name: https://www.nytimes.com/2000/05/30/us/museum-brings-town-back-to-life.html. And another: https://www.nytimes.com/2000/05/12/arts/inside-art-barkless-puppy-in-tree-s-place.html. The cited reference is unfindable on the internet (by me, anyway).
Any objections to me fixing this?
Eeblet (talk) 00:16, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where is this Silicon River from? It was Silicon Village.
Talk:Pavlovsk, Saint Petersburg

message: In the edit summary I mistakenly typed "Paul is better known as Pavel" but meant "Paul is better known than Pavel"" in English. Because this is the English-language Wiki, Paul/Pavel I should be primarily referred to by his more common English name. Olessi 22:14, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit Summary
Talk:Burbank, Illinois

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:28, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessor note
Talk:Capitol Hill, Denver

message: Vertigo700, I just added a Golden Triangle link -- do your magic.  TJL
I tried to edit this page. My biggest problem in the characteristsic section which includes discussion of streets and places that are not in this neighborhood. The defined boundaries do not include the hospitals in City Park West or 17th and 18th Avenues.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Francisbyrnes5121 (talk • contribs) 17:25, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Amyraldism

message: In the recent edits by 69.19.14.40, there seems to be some helpful, non-controversial material, but there is also a distinct bias as noted by the use of the qualifier on "Bezan Calvinism" that will need to be neutralized. I know that it has been suggested by some scholars that Calvinism, especially as it exists today, does not represent Calvin's Calvinism but Beza's expansion and modifications thereof (similar to how modern Lutheranism is supposed to have been largely mediated through Melancthon). What can we do to make this perspective more represented in the articles on Calvinism? While what we call Calvinism today is fairly accurately described by the Calvinism article IMHO, I think this viewpoint on the historical development of Calvinism certainly deserves a (preferably documented) paragraph or section in that article. --Flex 20:49, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The recent edits 69.19.14.40 reflect a particular POV especially with the term "Bezan" Calvinism.  Also, to refer to "universal atonement similar to that of John Calvin" is a POV which is nowhere considered a concensus.  While some of the recent edits are helpful, I believe some selected reversions or re-edits are in order here. Jim Ellis 13:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

text: I made a few edits addressing some of my concerns.  A section on "Calvin versus Calvinism" would  seem most appropriate on the Calvinism page. A brief reference here to the fact that some deny that Calvin would have supported limited atonement may be OK if fairly stated. Jim Ellis 18:05, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent edits

message: I just used the  method to insert a footnote, only to discover the other method was already in use for the existing notes. Unified note tagging method required. DFH 21:07, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Now done. DFH 09:12, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Footnote method 
Talk:Albert Spaggiari

message: All this article is inexact... Ericd 22:32, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I added the "Disputed" and "unreferenced" templates to reflect this. Gsp 23:20, 6 August 2005 (UTC)

text: What is inexact?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.86.113.202 (talk • contribs) 00:01, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look to the date. Since this comment I've almost entirely rewritten the article. Ericd 08:44, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: July 2005

message: There's is no doubt that Spaggiari was a far right sympathizer and had far-right friends but was he activist ? Excuse me if I misundertand English but what were his political activities ? Ericd 19:34, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: In this context I don't think that activism necessarily means political activism. He was actively engaging in pro-right terrorist and government organizations, which, according to the definition (guerilla-fighting is a form of activism, for example) would make him an activist. However, I do think the term activist might be a bit too general. Stefan Jansen 19:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I was mostly thinking about his OAS activities. As it seems now well estabhished that he also worked for the CIA I think it applies. Ericd 22:20, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: just have a look on this: it proves that he was working for the DINA, the secret service of Chili in 70's. It is also very well known that Spaggiari has visited Miami in the begining of 76, before his robbery, to meet exiled cubans; he did not worked alone, and was probably working for the CIA at this time...I can give you more information if you like... Vegetarian75 10:34, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Far right activism

message: In the french wikipedia, the year when Spaggiari was born is 1933. Which one is right?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.224.170.206 (talk • contribs) 20:13, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Birth

message: Spaggiari non è mai stato nella Legione straniera francese. --80.104.22.164 (talk) 11:45, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: June 2009

message: Sections which mention people who are likely to be alive making allegations about them must have actual sourcing.  Not zero sourcing.  I left in the other gossip. Collect (talk) 16:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this a real article or a piece from the [[National Enquirer]]

message: How is the template for Neo-Nazism relevant to this article? Adverseify (talk) 00:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It's included because this article is listed within.  As for why that is, that would be a question for the folks at :Template talk:Neo-Nazism.  —  Fourthords | =Λ= | 01:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Neo-Nazism Template
Talk:Turn! Turn! Turn! (album)

message: Denying that something isn't an NPOV violation doesn't resolve the problem, and absolute statements regarding the relative merits of artistic works are self-evident NPOV violation. Unsourced, undocumented statements regarding critical reception which mirror such statements are just NPOV violations in flimsy disguise. Monicasdude 22:45, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

message: I'm thinking that maybe the song should be at Turn! Turn! Turn! (song) whilst the album should be at the mainspace of "Turn! Turn! Turn!. Though I think this is a good idea, I'm not entirely familiar with the material - which is more famous? The song or the album? Sillyfolkboy (talk) (edits) 03:59, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The song is much more famous, though they are both famous enough to warrant the ...Turn! (song) and ...Turn! (album) scenario I should think. Cbben (talk) 16:07, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move? 
Talk:Groupie/Archive 1

message: Hello, i  changed the Houston Rocket bit at the start to something more generic - yeah i know, boring... but i'm still not sure what sport has to do with groupyism? anyway, just stumbling Boomshanka (talk) 14:52, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: minor edit

message: I would like to change this article and propose a rewrite with better reference and citations. The conclusions regarding groupies in graf #2 of Types of Groupies and in graf #2 of Motives of Groupies have no citations or references to back them up. However there is ample book, newspaper, and magazine examples of the opposite. 
There was also an excellent academic book published 2 years ago that offers some of the only hard analyses of groupies available. Numerous current memoirs exist or are imminent and these too provide clearer understanding of a complex subculture. The old Rolling Stone articles on groupies plus the book Groupies and Other Girls are good examples of early documentation - none is used or cited in the current article.
I'm interested in discussion on the topic.
Fairblonde 23:27, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed rewrite 

message: = = See also = =
* [ [ Category : Groupies | List of Groupies ] ]
---i would like it to show up under the article itself, not very far below with the other "categories"
thanks!  :)
:—Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.12.116.9 (talk • contribs) 
OK, it's easy. You can add the text List of Groupies and it will produce "List of Groupies". The trick you are asking for is in the leading colon - it converts the categorization into ordinary link.
BTW, same applies to inter-wikies: :de:Groupie will give you :de:Groupie in the text instead of the lower left pane. You could have used the "nowiki"-tags instead of spaces in you question above as in my examples. -- Goldie (tell me) 22:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  how do i make this show up correctly? 

message: Me either! In fact, there's a lot of pompous statements that I just can't get to right now but will soon. "Imaginary world" is one but the one that is so gawdawfully off base is the statement about
"regardless of the fact that the objects of their obsession may already be married, have children, or otherwise already in a committed relationship."  Fairblonde 01:31, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Imaginary world"
Talk:Anand Lal Shimpi

message: This content was moved here from Anand Shimpi as Anand Lal Shimpi is his full name. HackJandy 22:52, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: That book is self-published (by Jeff Heaton), so probably not a WP:RS for a WP:BLP. Tijfo098 (talk) 08:11, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Heaton Research book 

message: This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because there is nothing useful except advertisement of a person and his company. — Morsecoder (talk) 22:47, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contested deletion 

message: He is not particularly noteworthy and has done nothing in particular since 1997.
2600:6C56:6408:71:A825:44B3:E234:C0C8 (talk) 07:12, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please delete this article
Talk:Taz-Mania

message: I have to say that the accusation that Taz was making fun of Downs Syndrome children is retarded. That woman should be ashamed of herself for pretending to speak for retarded children like that. There needs to be laws that protect people from such people wanting to exploit the mental disabilities of others to ruin the reputations of others. Isn't that already called slander? Anyway, the tasmanian devil cartoon had always spoken in grunts etc. since when the character first appeared decades ago. Howcome nobody took offense to it then? As if Downs Syndrome people were the only mentally retaded people who couldn't communicate. What a gratuitous swipe at ruining a perfectly harmless cartoon with no obvious intent of offense to ANYONE. There are already people who also take offense at the word "retarded." Sorry, but that's retarded. Some extremists believe that that word is as offensive as other four letter words and that's retarded. Retarded, retarded, retarded. Give me a word, and there's sure to be a group that takes "offense" at it. Pretty soon there will be a group to ban the word "the" from *** dictionary, because "***" is such a specifying article so as to be offensive. People that attempt to make an issue where there is not one really p*ss the h*ll out of me.222.151.236.116 (talk) 06:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Since you've stated that it will annoy you, I would like to tell you that there is no need for your frequent use of the word "retarded" in your description of people with Down's Syndrome. Also, try and keep any potentially offensive comments to your self in future as there is no need for them in Wikipedia. Thank you. TheTrojanHought (talk) 13:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

text: The only health related issue I came across when watching the show was that seizure-inducing intro. Not much else comes into my mind. 68.75.31.179 (talk) 00:30, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Accusation

message: Huh the guy who did Axle's voice I guess also did Pinky's. In some respects Axle & Bull have a working relationship sort of similar to Pinky and the Brain. Although Bull isn't especially bright and it's made a bit more clear that Axle is quite well-educated, even brilliant. I'm not sure how to mention that in an NPOV way. Although the information about Axle was in one episode so I can mention it.--T. Anthony 15:24, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What a terrible description of Taz!  - JC  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.52.69.18 (talk) 16:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Axle & Pinky

message: Added episode listing in table format with official WB production codes and original airdates where available. Davemackey (talk) 21:07, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Added Episode Listing
Talk:Richard Brooks (actor)

message: * He said the last words of the Firefly TV series (not the movie).  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZ6GtlAQcjk  
* He had the best misunderstanding quote from the series.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTSmKjdhNIg
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  11:02, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Firefly TV Series
Talk:Time loop

message: Please only add examples that have a source discussing their significance in relation to the topic of the article. ForgotMyAccountName (talk) 12:26, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Strange Life of Ivan Osokin is an example of the trope that is 50 years older than any other example mentioned on this page, so I reverted the edit that removed it. -- Walt Pohl (talk) 10:35, 07 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding examples
Talk:Daniel Kan

message: If anyone has more biographical info that would be great. I can't find his birthdate anywhere. Dave Rosoff 23:13, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
:The 4/8/1927 now appears.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.29.112 (talk) 09:17, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Why is his ethnicity stated in the main description of the person? I don't think this is standard practice, and while I'm sure nothing sinister was meant it comes off as a bit racist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.81.42 (talk) 15:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Jewish

message: According to Brouwer's wikipedia page Kan survived Bergen-Belsen, see here as well. This seems like it should be mentioned. 2600:8802:2619:E400:F999:C2F5:F473:3ECA (talk) 20:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holocaust survivor
Talk:Glass marimba

message: Yes, please merge "Glass Marimba" and "Glass marimba."  They are the same instrument.  Badagnani 23:26, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Mysid (talk) 05:56, August 1, 2005 (UTC)
For discussion of the September 2006 proposed merger of the marimba and glass marimba entries, please see the Talk page for marimba. jp2 21:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Mergers
Talk:Limited liability partnership

message: I can see no resolution that has to do with HID or Hughes Aircraft or parts being reviewed for safety in Osha  or on this germ warfare so how do they think Liability at Banks work on relations with hostile parties. At Wells Fargo they continue to discriminate. 174.29.39.28 (talk) 07:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation on a LLP 

message: Girl 103.246.42.210 (talk) 09:10, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Llp
Talk:Ernest W. Barrett Parkway

message: I take it this individual doesn't like this road much... - Lucky 6.9 23:33, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I moved the page to its official name but the common name redirects here.  Also the statement "(officially Ernest W. Barrett Parkway, though nobody uses the full name)" was removed because it is POV. --Jerm  (Talk/ Contrib) 01:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming
Talk:Caveat venditor

message: Does this mean "watch out for counterfeits"? --Ihope127 23:38, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it can do with many problems of a seller/buyer relationship. In a way, a seller and a buyer are very similar: they are both participating in a trade. Here's one example: someone is cleaning out their attic and they sell a box of comic books. A buyer comes up and buys the whole box for $50, knowing full well some of the comics were worth $500! MShonle 23:06, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Barðaströnd

message: This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 23:41, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Vote for Deletion
Talk:2005 Pacific typhoon season

message: It would be nice if people can also look at this article to be improved as I believe we are nearly there. As of this message the article is at a 'Start' class, and closing in into a 'C'. Amount of information in each storm article is decent enough for an upgrade. We only need citations in each storm article as they are quite lacking, a season summary paragraph and seasonal forecasts section. Any decent information should be put in here as well. Typhoon2013 (talk) 03:23, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2005 PTS article class rating