lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Adenosylcobalamin

message: Cobamamide is also known as dibencozide. I think its a worthy fact to note in the stub.24.83.178.11 09:37, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cobamamide aka Dibencozide

message: The displayed structure contains an error. There is a bond from the cobalt that leads nowhere symbolizing a CH3 that should not be there.87.102.144.167 07:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree. There shouldn't be a methyl group. The issue is how do we remove it if we do not have the original file. --Kupirijo (talk) 08:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 

message: Hi,
The article state "is a cofactor (active) form of cyanocobalamin."
However isn't cyanocobalamin and adenosyl-cobalamin two forms of cobalamin ???
[]
82.249.145.112 (talk) 16:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Active form of cyanocobalamin?

message: This is insane.  I demand a new name on this article, that is not biased towards Barack Obama.  Seriously, can we keep biological/scientific articles out of politics please? Appalling really. 68.143.88.2 (talk) 14:06, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ha ha. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 16:18, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm placing the Neutrality tag on this article 

message: Hi,
I think it would be worthy to change the title of the article to Adenosylcobalamin, or perhaps Coenzyme B12.  Cobamamide is a drug name, of which adenosylcobalamin has several (including Dibencozide).  For researchers in the field of cobalamin synthesis, "cobamamide" is practically never used.  A google scholar result returns a few hundred "cobamamide" articles, about a third of which are patents, vs. several thousand for "adenosylcobalamin," many of which are in prominent journals such as JACS and others in the ACS family.  Thoughts?
FlavorFMN (talk) 22:34, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree - use the standardized scientific name - Adenosylcobalamin  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.204.136.119 (talk) 04:41, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

text: Done. --Hyperforin (talk) 17:39, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title change
Talk:Acroloxidae

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Whpq (talk) 18:48, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Peredur

message: He is also known as Peredur (something) Dur, or Peredur Strong Arms, and comes late or at the end of the time Arthur supposedly reigned. I can't find the place it came from, but I'll get back when I do. ---G.T.N. (talk) 23:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have added a best effort at IPA-cy pronunciation, based mainly on listening to Martin Geeson's reading of The Mabinogion on Librivox and the Help:IPA for Welsh page. Sadly, I don't speak Welsh and am not a phonologist, but I thought some guidance was appropriate. Kind Welsh phonologist, please review. Thanks. --Frans Fowler (talk) 18:35, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems correct - the name is roughly similar in pronunciation to English "parader". Cagwinn (talk) 04:24, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation (IPA) 
Talk:Diadema antillarum

message: Most of this page doesn't seem to be that structured, and reads like its been copied from an article somewhere. I've added a cleanup tag and sectioned it off a little. JMatopos (talk) 13:04, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a first go at a clean-up. The article reads better now,but it still needs more work. Maybe I can do that this weekend. Invertzoo (talk) 20:44, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Talk:Ken Tamplin

message: Way too much non-NPOV stuff in the intro. Needs rewriting.
KConWiki 04:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the majority of the material as it read like a PR fluff piece and was definitely not neutral. In addition, the wall of text in the lede was completely unsourced. Hopefully the article can now be built up with proper sourcing and a neutral tone. I'll see what I can dig up to help flesh the article out. --Jezebel'sPonyoshhh 17:16, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-NPOV material

message: are his "overdose"s really relevant?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.250.235.234 (talk) 21:29, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Non-NPOV material

message: I removed the mention of "Ken Tamplin Vocal Academy" because it has not been discussed in WP:SECONDARY sources. All I see in online searches are promotional press releases and other unreliable stuff. Binksternet (talk) 04:35, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Academy is not significant
Talk:Ruth Bryan Owen

message: Both this article and the one on Eugenie Anderson claim that the subject was the first female US Ambassador – although one article clarifies this with a distinction on "ministerial" and "ambassadorial" level. The thing is, if someone was to come to only this article they wouldn't necessarily get the clarification, which is why one or the other article needs more clarification. 101090ABC (talk) 20:35, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Eyrian

message: Category:	22
Image talk:	2
Image:	77
Mainspace	3831
Portal:	24
Talk:	354
Template talk:	4
Template:	34
User talk:	380
User:	77
Wikipedia talk:	20
Wikipedia:	118
avg edits per page	2.75
earliest	04:41, 22 April 2005
number of unique pages	1798
total	4943
Source —Anas talk? 20:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:The Education of Max Bickford

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episodes and characters, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:17, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters
Talk:Camera Lucida (book)

message: Would it be possible to add citations, particularly "both works have been much criticised since the 1990."photophosphor 20:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The criticism blurb that was in this article was hardly notable and in fact, quite trivial, considering the significance of Roland Barthes' book.  I've moved it below for discussion if people would like to weigh in on the matter.—DMCer™ 09:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I included this section because I believe it adds another perspective to the text. Certainly, James Elkins is significant in the field of photography, and the History of Photography is a peer reviewed journal, so when Elkins says the Barthes’ ideas are out of touch with reality, I think that is fairly significant statement. What do others think?--Ducio1234 (talk) 13:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: On criticism

message: So which is it?
"Published posthumously in 1980, Camera Lucida is Barthes's first and only book devoted to photography"
"Barthes died in an automobile accident soon after the publication of Camera Lucida"
Davidships (talk) 16:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication or death? 

message: What kind of bizarre remark is it that Mythologies was "published untranslated in 1957"? Almost all books are initially published in their original language, so that's the normal case. Furthermore, almost all translations are published after the oringal, so again it's the normal case that the original is "untranslated" at the time of its publication. This wording looks to me like knee-jerk anglocentrism. Now if the article were to point out that an English translation of Mythologies was published in 1972, that would be information. Wegesrand (talk) 15:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Published untranslated"
Talk:Joseph Scelsi Intermodal Transportation Center

message: This article needs a history section, or at least a pre-history section. I suggest adding an image of the former Pittsfield Statin for anybody who writes one. ----DanTD (talk) 11:56, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: A few years later, but it's complete. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a history section 

message: I'd like to merge Union Station (Pittsfield, Massachusetts) and Pittsfield Depot into the History section here. Both are stub articles that are extremely limited on their own, because the history of railroading in Pittsfield is extremely complex. There have been no less than eight stations in total in Pittsfield, and their history is best understood in the context of each other. It would detract from the smooth flow to parcel some out to separate articles for no real benefit. Neither station was particularly architecturally significant (Meeks snubs them and instead mentions the 1840 station) nor widely historically important (neither still stands, and the second Union Station was not placed on the National Register) enough to merit separate articles. Undue weight should not be an issue; the article as it currently stands has a fairly balanced history and I don't see the text being substantially changed by the merge. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Makes sense to me.--agr (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

text: * I don't believe we're actually getting that far afield, geographically or topically. All the stations discussed here (save for the original Housatonic station, which has no description or image in any source I've gotten my paws on) are a direct series of replacements for the original 1840 depot. All except the 1965-1981 station are located within the same 2000-foot stretch of rail in downtown Pittsfield. Service patterns, owners, and other incidentals changed at different times than the stations did, which means there'd be a lot of repetition between articles. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 14:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: * Sold! Mackensen (talk) 14:55, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

text: * Up to the author, and it wouldn't be me! I think it would inevitably be in-scope if such were written, assuming sources exist. Mackensen (talk) 01:51, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge
Talk:Bibliography of King Arthur

message: How should books be ordered within their headings?  Chronologically? Alpha by author?
I'd especially like to sort the 20th century English titles - it's hard to tell what's missing. - PKM (talk) 02:02, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Firstly, the languages in each section should be arranged alphabetically, I believe. The current (or original) arrangement seems to be chronological. For modern works, the author is placed by date of first Arthurian work. However, many links have been placed out of order, and many don't have the publication date listed. Articles need to be created for the older works of note (such as "Arthour and Merlin"), dates need to be added when known, and the works need to be ordered correctly in chronological order. — ★Parsa ☞ talk 16:10, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Order?

message: How do we define about Arthur, I have a couple of novels that use Camelot or Arthur as the background (but in the case of one) much like the Green Knight only briefly feature Arthur, and the other just uses Arthur as the plot device  (its also a very bad novel).Slatersteven (talk) 16:57, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: About?

message: Some lists of books have been added to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. You can find the discussions here. RockMagnetist (talk) 22:17, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alert: lists of publications in Articles for deletion 

message: Does anyone know the editio princeps date for the various medieval works? The only one I've been able to find out is Historia Regum Brittaniae (1508). --110.174.166.224 (talk) 13:15, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Editio princeps 

message: I don't sure, but it seems they should be linked (i.e., it is the same one page, just in two different languages):
https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_d'œuvres_concernant_le_cycle_arthurien
:why?Slatersteven (talk) 10:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Odd that the French article has no links. Doug Weller talk 11:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Arthurian cycle and King Arthur aren't strictly identical, but it's effectively the same thing, yes. Renard Migrant (talk) 15:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Turns out I can't, because they're on Wikidata under two separate entries. I'd have to propose a merge, and I don't know how. Renard Migrant (talk) 15:52, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to French pages 

message: A 270 page essay is available here, Romans en vers du cycle de la Table ronde, in Histoire littéraire de la France, tome 30, 1888, by Gaston Paris. Some of these are probably too little-known to merit a place here, but it is interesting we have La Vengeance Raguidel but not Meraugis de Portlesguez, by the same author (probably) and I'd've said better known. Renard Migrant (talk) 21:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for a lot of Old French works 

message: This title is not intuitive to me. I would expect a "bibliography of King Arthur" to be a list of secondary works about Arthurian literature. This is a list of Arthurian literature. Srnec (talk) 20:02, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Bedfordshire clanger

message: Is 'menfolk' a technical term?
:"Menfolk" and "womenfolk" are good Old English words which do not need translating.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 13:37, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

message: The common english phrase "Dropping a clanger" (meaning saying something extremely inappropriate) is something I always understood to be related to this food item - clearly, dropping something made of pastry with meat at one end and jam at the other would make a truly spectacular mess.
It would be nice to add this to the article - but I don't seem to be able to find a reliable source for it.
Any ideas? SteveBaker (talk) 19:24, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it! Done. TY for the great idea I never heard this one but searching, "drop a clanger" yields quite a few references.Housewifehader (talk) 19:13, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes it would be messy. But I believe that it is "clang" as in "bell", such as that described here and not "clang" is in "obscure British foodstuff". Shritwod (talk) 08:01, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, and the freedictionary.com reference does not mention the pastry. The OED says the phrase just comes from clang meaning to make a noise. Therefore I have removed the unsupported claim from this article. By the way, I have searched in vain for an explanation of the naming of this pastry, and I can only guess that it refers to its weight and hardness: H. E. Bates in a short story called The Bedfordshire Clanger describes it as "Sort o' pudden. Suet. Hard as a hog's back."  --Heron (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It probably comes from Midland dialect "clungy" or "clangy", meaning dense (refs provided). All pre 1970s references describe this as a boiled suet and meat dumpling or pudding, often with liver, so it would have been very stodgy, or clangy.Svejk74 (talk) 19:48, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dropping a clanger.
Talk:Jordan (disambiguation)

message: Would Jordan Cavanaugh, the main character from Crossing Jordan, fit the "Other uses" section? Kenshin (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crossing Jordan 

message: Shouldn't Michael Jordan (basketball player) be on this list. He was the world's most famous athlete for more than a decade.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.131.200.25 (talk) 15:04, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael Jordan 

message: This user, Qzd had repeatedly deleted my edits. What is your problem dude?
101.178.163.208 (talk) 04:47, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Jordan Ash does not meet wp:Notability (people) no article. Jim1138 (talk) 05:06, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok, but how do you call him no notable. If you look at the references, he has acted in more than one movie. Over a hundred.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.178.163.208 (talk) 05:26, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jordan 
Talk:Korotkoff sounds

message: Under the description of Korotkoff sounds, the author mentions "points" but there is no definition of what a "point" is.
24.237.2.246 (talk) 16:12, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Points 

message: It seems that at some point, somebody went over this article with the policy to correct all Korotkoffs to Korotkovs. Even the single reference that has the guy's name in the title in the original spells it "Korotkoff" and here it is given as "Korotkov". I will change them all to Korotkoff (so that it is again consistent with the article's title. Seattle Jörg (talk) 13:15, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course I kept it when there is reference to him explicitly. Another argument: "korotkoff sound" gives me 37000 hints at google, "korotkov sound" only 1730. Seattle Jörg (talk) 13:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korotkoff or Korotkov
Talk:Energy in Taiwan

message: See http://web2.moeaboe.gov.tw/ecw/About/energy%20situation/main/en_01.html --JensMueller (talk) 01:25, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current information (2007) 

message: Green energy technologies are a top priority on the Taiwan government's list of new industries to promote.  This sounds campaignish. Is there any objective evidence for this claim? Readin (talk) 21:25, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Green energy technologies are a top priority..." 

message: Since the latest referendum was against the policy of the government of phasing out the nuclear  - should we not add this information to the article?
The taiwan government already confirmed that it will follow the will of the people  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:4C1D:ECC0:FDB2:4577:12D6:B70F (talk) 19:11, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The pro nuclear referendum should be reflected in the article
Talk:The Wedding of Sir Gawain and Dame Ragnelle

message: Just Sit Right Back and You'll Hear a Tale, A Tale of gw-Alchemic g-Wedding, That Started from this Tragic Port, Aboard King Author's Bedding.
The Mate was a Fighty Moon at Knight, The sKypper A Dying King, Who Married them A Crone who Wained, but Newness made Her Bright!
( () )
The inQuestior Started Getting Tough, The Kingly Slip was Tossed, If not for The Courage of the Fearless Groom, The Men(strat)ion wood be Lost!
Kang Author crashed his ship upon a deserted forest Home, With Gingalain, King Fisher too, The Mill of Air, and his Wife, a Moving Star, the Professer and Mary Land, here on Gawain-agains Ile!
Now this was the tale of Our Last Days!  "I'll be Back another Time!"  Says Ra, The Sun, a falling Thang: Go-waining on an uphill climb.
The First Mating and a Skipper or two, will dew the berries best.  To make the others Cum for Table, on a Tragic Eye-Land Test.
No Home, No Light, No Motor Car, Not a Single Lux-Usury.  Like Robbing Sun and Cursed (O), As Primate-ive as Man Bee.
So Join the Beams if it gets week, in the Groomer's Air to the Throne -- Sun's Home de Jour.
You're be sure to get a smile, when Convergent Waves Create a Light, Here on Gilligan's Isle!
----
Hint: What women desire moistly is to Re-Sire (sire the Sun God): It is Re-Dick-You-Lust, quite Ridiculous.
The hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.  The moon decides whether to be seen in day or night.  Crone, Maiden, Mother, and Saturn Time was the "spell".
But if this reeks of B.S. to you, you're under the Sun Worshiper's magic smell!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:7960:4EE0:F50B:4CA2:61B:ECD (talk) 12:49, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Riverside–Downtown station

message: I tried to add as much information as I could, but unfortunately this came out more like a Metrolink brochure than an encyclopedia. There really is very little of note about the Riverside station, however, excepting the routes that serve it, so I hope I did the right thing. Plattypus1 (talk) 10:30, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: It appears that almost all of this is incorrect. Spot-checking Amtrak timetables doesn't show service in the 1970s or 1980s; and the Southwest Limited (predecessor of the Chief) was still using the traditional Santa Fe route via Pasadena until 1994. On the 1962 Santa Fe timetable the sole remaining train to Riverside was the Grand Canyon, which was discontinued in 1971. Riverside may have lost service even before that. The building listed on the NRHP is not the original Santa Fe depot (which does still stand), but the Union Pacific depot, built in 1904, and on a different alignment. Most of the text was added in 2008 by ; the mistaken NRHP id was by  in 2015: . Mackensen (talk) 02:07, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prior service
Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Karl Meier

message: :: Can you please explain why? User:ProtectWomen is certainly a sock(the first diff shows that). These two users share much common interests; Islamophobia, Criticism of Islam... --Aminz 05:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So do you, and perhaps Kirbytime, ALM, Itaqallah and a few other editors. Unfortunately for you, you'll have to present evidence before making accusations and wasting peoples time with them on public forums such as this one. Request for checkuser is not for fishing. -- Karl Meier 05:58, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I have asked Jpgordon to share with us his reasoning. You've already stated your position and so did I (e.g we have a new editor who is clearly a sockpuppet of someone(as shown by the first edit); an editor who only edits certain articles- the rest is based upon feelings and conjectures which at least 2 editors share). Please let Jpgordon to share with us what he thinks. --Aminz 06:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Insufficient grounds, and it really does feel like harassment. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 19:10, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Jpgordon, thank you and I echo your sentiments. This does feel like harassment to me and it doesn't feel good to be on the receiving end of it.  I placed a comment on Aminz's talk page  which should be read by all users interested in this request.  Also I will do a huge favor for this user and "reveal" my "sock" so that a non-admin checkuser can be performed by said user.  Karl states on his webpage "Please note, my IP address is 85.81.20.149. So if I haven't logged in, or if FireFox has logged me out again for some reason, then that's me."  I've had a similar problem happen to me and you can find "my sockpuppet" right here: .  If you want to know about my motivations for editing Wikipedia you can find it here: my first edit was intended for  Muhammad.   Aminz, any more problems, please contact me on my user page.  I had a similar problem once with Itaqallah for going behind my back, but found this user to be very amicable and apologetic.  Even though Itaqallah and I disagree on some points of Islam, I have to say I respect him very much for his civility.--ProtectWomen 19:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  As long as your user page stay the way it is. I cannot believe a word your have said. --- ALM 20:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Take it elsewhere. Clerks, please remove the threaded conversation to the talk page. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 20:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)