lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Canadian Avalanche Association

message: Many of these definitions are off of the American Avalanche Associations' table, and not the Canadian. It defies the point of this article if this is not fixed. As I do not feel comfortable messing with the tables, I would urge a senior editor to change this, and check into the real definition.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eastonlee (talk • contribs) 04:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean by definitions? If you mean the danger rating scale, Canadian and American systems are the same. Billscottbob (talk) 04:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The danger scale is not the same in that the American scale a "Where" category has been added, and clearly whoever edited this article, amalgamated the "where" and "why" columns, into this danger scale, resulting in slight confusion on my part. Eastonlee (talk) 04:46, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, if you want to change it, go ahead. If you need some guidance on tables try Help:tables. Billscottbob (talk) 05:01, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-Important Issue
Talk:Jack Conley (actor)

message: IMDb lists Heaven's Gate (1980) as Jack Conley's first film (albeit credited as John Conley).  This film was released twelve years before Jack appeared in any other projects.  The long gap and the different name make me suspect that IMDb may be in error here.  Does anybody have a reference that independently confirms that Jack is John? —MJBurrage • TALK • 04:14, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Heaven's Gate
Talk:Fairfield Methodist Schools

message: I cannot see that it makes any sense to list one or two individual teachers unless there is something particularly notable about them. If you are going to list those teachers, you might as well list all of them -- which would be rather non-encyclopaedic and certainly not normal practice for a Wikipedia article about a school. Alarics (talk) 12:10, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Names of individual teachers
Talk:Kelsey Liu

message: : Considering that the pages in existence for this show are already up for deletion, AND this article has neither the references, links, or depth of even those pages, I had to add it to the list. For reference, these are the other pages being reviewed:
* 
* 
* 
* 
* 
: VigilancePrime (talk) 04:25, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I vote to delete this page. It has no additonal information. She was not even a town coucil. --Ahkat (talk) 02:48, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Existing AfD
Talk:One Australia

message: Is there any reason given why this page should be deleted? It's well sourced, as far as I can see, and might be extended as well, but deleting this page seems like glossing over an important aspect of JH's time as PM. --Lord Chao (talk) 10:07, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently re-editing article to concentrate on the 1988 policies.Lester 22:48, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is the page up for deletion? 

message: The Howard quote:"I do believe that if it is - in the eyes of some in the community...etc etc, is part of One Australia, as shown in references. Someone removed it, saying it's not referenced, so I restored it again.Lester 11:23, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quote: I do believe 

message: Most of the references in this article do not even mention the "One Australia policy". This entire article a piece of synthesis. It reads like someone cut out a bunch of newspaper clippings and tried to attribute it to a policy called "One Australia policy". Only citations that actually mention the One Australia policy should be included.Prester John  -(Talk to the Hand) 16:25, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Like I said in my previous post in the section above, the references mention the quote about Asian immigration as part of 'One Australia'. The intro statement about opposition to multiculturalism was also accurate, and the references did not mention "cultural assimilation", as the other editor changed it to.Lester 20:27, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rampant Original Research
Talk:Query by Example

message: Why is there a link to Microsoft? Is there any evidence that Microsoft either implemented or claimed to implement QBE? QBE is a specific language like FORTRAN or C, not a generic term for any visual interface.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by JonnyBoats (talk • contribs) 17:32, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC, Microsoft Research has published papers about Query By Example. Also there's a Wikipedia article about the Microsoft implementation of the language, so it makes sense to link to it from here. Diego (talk) 18:31, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Microsoft?

message: Would GraphQL be a recent example?  If so, perhaps it should be added here. 2604:2000:6999:1200:CCC7:2B26:E5EA:570D (talk) 15:22, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  GraphQL
Talk:Ella, elle l'a

message: and alizee? she sang this song  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.9.182.205 (talk) 02:18, 17 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alizee 
Talk:A Step into the Past

message: There should not be a mix of Cantonese and Mandarin for the names because it's very confusing and irritating. We should choose either and stick to it. The names in the version that I edited some months ago were in Mandarin mostly, except for the main character's name. I changed all to Mandarin to eliminate confusion. A few days ago, an editor changed all the characters' names to Cantonese, but not for the names of the states and dynasties etc. Hence, we see "Hung Siu-Lung", "Chun Ching" etc, but also Qin Dynasty, State of Zhao etc. I've changed all the names of the states to Cantonese too. Can we arrive at a general consensus here on whether to use Cantonese or Mandarin, and stick to the final decision permanently? I'm in a dilemma here. Mandarin, because people are more familiar with "Qin Dynasty" and "Qin Shi Huang" rather than "Chun Dynasty" and "Chun Chi Wong"; Cantonese, because this series is produced in Hong Kong, and the default language is Cantonese. What do others think? _LDS (talk) 15:34, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Cantonese or Mandarin?
Talk:Nazi War Crimes and Japanese Imperial Government Records Interagency Working Group

message: The number of pages examined are already described in the "Research cost and scale" section in a WP:NPOV manner. Comparing the number of pages between Nazi and Japan and insisting it as limitations is WP:SYNTH. It is natural to think Nazi crimes are much larger scale than Japanese crimes. 
The concern of the IWG  is only part of the descriptions and the last part of descriptions says 
If you understand English, the sentence "The IWG was concerned" is "past tense" which means the concern was resolved. Citing only part of descriptions and insisting it as limitations is WP:SYNTH.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 04:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: , please respond here. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 05:38, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit by [[Special:Contributions/1.240.250.175|1.240.250.175]] and revert by [[Special:Contributions/Catrin00| Catrin00]] 
Talk:Gaocheng, Shijiazhuang

message: I've added a disambig link to Gaochang since I just ran across the name in Paul Theroux's travel writings ("To The Ends of The Earth" compilation), used several times so i dont think its just a typo. Not sure if this is an alternate spelling or what. Also going to mention at that article's talkpage. El duderino (abides) 02:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Currently Gaochang doesn't mention "Gaocheng" as an alternative name or as some subdivision of the ruins, so it would be best to search for the actual Chinese characters as confirmation, and then leave an entry for Gaochang at Gaocheng (disambiguation) instead. GotR Talk 06:38, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  city ruins in western China, similar name 
Talk:Eryx conicus

message: The first two ¶s of the "Description", which are unsourced, do not seem to fit this snake. The first ¶ sounds like a description (diagnosis) of the genus Eryx (sensu lato), probably from Boulenger's 1890 Fauna of British India, of which I don't have a copy. The second ¶ is almost exactly the same as Boulenger's description of Eryx johnii in his 1893 Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural History), Volume I., page 127. Perhaps someone could move these ¶s to the proper WP articles, Eryx (genus) and E. johnii respectively, and then delete them from this article.74.109.236.194 (talk) 04:26, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Problem with "Description"
Talk:Volodymyr Yaniv

message: This article's opening paragraph seems to have been transposed erroneously from the article on Dmytro Hrytsai, who apparently died in 1945.  According to the present Volodymyr Yaniv article, Yaniv was still active in 1987.  
Is the birthdate cited for Yaniv, November 21, 1907, actually correct for Hrytsai?  If so, could it be entered in the Hrytsai-article lead?  Nihil novi (talk) 04:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Erroneous lead?
Talk:Abd al-Aziz al-Ghumari

message: Usually when a tag is placed, there must me some details on where the work should be done to improve the article. Now in terms of wikification and tone, and compared to many other articles, this article is neutral in tone, fact reporting with no original researh, and wikified better then many untagged other artciles. There is no need for the tags, or if some details on where work should be done in this article, they are much appreciated.--Yusayr (talk) 20:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: About the tone and wikification

message: I just noticed that, according to the article Ben Sadiq was born in 1920 and his father died in 1887.  Given the 33-year gap, perhaps that was meant to be a birthdate for his father?  -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 20:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  His father 
Talk:Li Jing (deity)

message: I don't understand whether it is one of the Four Heavenly kings (like Vaisravana is) or not, like it is written in this article. The page from the Webster Online Dictionary, from which the article has been taken says it is one of the four heavenly kings....  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pietro Amadini (talk • contribs) 12:16, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: No, he's not. Li Jing is the first military commander under the Jade Emperor. The Four Heavenly kings guard the four gates to heaven since there are four cardinal directions. --2.245.169.46 (talk) 01:56, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Chief Langalibalele Rifles

message: According to this organigram the Dukes are supposed to be a "Sea-landed" unit, rather than "ordinary" motorised infantry. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 20:25, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sea-landed role? 
Talk:Janaka Perera

message: In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :) 
* "priu.gov" :
** Maj. Gen. Janaka Perera retires after 34 years of service
** . 
Major General Janaka Perera was appointment as Chief of Staff of the army in 2000 but retired in 2001 when he was overlooked for promotion to Army Commander, causing him to retire in 2001<ref>Politics
DumZiBoT (talk) 10:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bot report: Found duplicate references! 
Talk:Computer network operations

message: wasn't the phrase Computer Network Operations (CNO) deprecated (deleted)? 149.32.192.38 (talk) 21:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: If you propose a change to the article, you'll have to provide some details, and some reliable source supports it. Otherwise, we have nothing we can talk about, I'm afraid. Paradoctor (talk) 22:35, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  CNO
Talk:Red spitting cobra

message: The given maximum size is definitely wrong as we have individuals here that are longer than 120 cm. 131.220.133.204 (talk) 11:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: page moved per capitalization conventions. JHunterJ (talk) 21:53, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Description
Talk:Holy Synod of Milan

message: This article is in serious need of being updated, with the help of someone who has dates, knowledge of precise facts, and sources for the recent events leading up to the demise of the former Milan Synod.  Within the last two years, Archbishop Luca of Torcello has gone into retirement.  Within the last 18 months, communion has been severed with the four bishops of the former North American branch of the Milan Synod (Metropolitan John of New York, Archbishop Hilarion of Austin, Bishop Phanourios of Lincoln, and Bishop Pavlos of Maspeth, the last of whom has since died); Bishop Ildefonso of Seville and Archbishop Onuphry of Bergamo have left and joined with another bishop to form a new Western European synod; Bishop Pablo of Italica has left to join the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia, it is unclear what has happened to Archbishop Boris of Germany but he has been removed from the Milan Synod's websites, and Archbishop Abundius of Como has resigned his episcopal rank.
This means that the Synod of Milan has essentially ceased to exist.  There is only one bishop left (Metropolitan Evloghios), who has care for a parish and a handful of clergy in Italy, with two isolated priests in the UK who have no parishes.  Recent photographs show Metropolitan Evloghios serving not as a bishop but as a simple priest.  Whatever else this tiny remnant might be, it cannot be called a synod by any commonly understood definition of the word, and the article should be updated to reflect this.(Bertelin (talk) 09:17, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: apparamente secondo loro sito nell anno 2018 ci sono due vescovi (Evloghios e Avondios)piu 13 "parrochie" sicuramente picole (ci sono solamente photographie di una communita in Italia, les altre non sono presente) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.44.179.27 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update needed 

message: The WP:COI tag on this article is very stale. The user  has not edited here in 5 years.  There is no active discussion (indeed, no discussion of any kind) about the conflict here on the talk page. I will remove the tag shortly, unless objections are presented here. Elizium23 (talk) 00:16, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: let's hear from you as well, as the tagger. Elizium23 (talk) 00:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Tag removed. --Joshua Issac (talk) 21:28, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stale COI tag
Talk:Chrismon

message: "They can also be found as decorations in and outside of christian church buildings and homes, and even found on gravestones and personal stationary."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
A particularly good example of needle point Christmas tree decorations can be found at the URL http://www.zianet.com/fpc/chrismons.htm. On that link there is a short introduction and 21 examples of chrismon needle point art work.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
It was noted that the article asked for pictoral examples. Any of these pictures are available for use. High resolution files are available. Contact aburr@aol.com.
05:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is based on two different uses of the name Chrismon: Christogram and Chi Rho. Some further clarification is needed Pinea (talk) 11:22, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like this article might be a little redundant to the Christogram article... AnonMoos (talk) 14:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Ambiguity of this text

message: We should cover this here or at  Christogram. Rich Farmbrough, 15:14, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Staurogram

message: I now noticed that there is Chrismon tree which means that Chrismon tree may need to be merged into Christmas tree. I suggested it on Christmas tree. History2007 (talk) 07:31, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Need to merge Chrismon tree?

message: I haven't been able to find any validation of the inclusion of a crow, in any form, as a symbol for Christ, as given in the cited work.  Sources can be wrong, and I think this one is.  A descending dove is a common Christian symbol, as is a crown, but a "crow, descending down" is something I haven't found in any source but the one.Dismalscholar (talk) 07:53, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crow?
Talk:Abingdon Press

message: . As depicted in :Commons:Category:A knight that smote the dragon (1892) about John Bartholomew Gough by  might be of interestLotje (talk) 12:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Abney Park Chapel

message: The article has room for economising on prose, it seems to take after the article on Abney Park Cemetery itself. It is more literary than encyclopaedic in style. There is a good deal of repetition and extensive use of adjectives, as well as  a noticeable absence of citations. I have deleted most of the section "Landscape Setting" because it somewhat rambles away from concentration on the building which is the article's topic. I have put in citation need tags where a citation would be useful.Cloptonson (talk) 17:54, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticisms 

message: Love Hackney claims the chapel was completed in 1842, see Love Hackney April 2024. 2A00:23C6:1484:9401:FC52:1391:60F2:8A35 (talk) 08:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  completion? opening?
Talk:African Methodist Episcopal Zion Church

message: There is now a proposal for a WikiProject group, possibly initially a subproject of Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity, to deal with articles relating to the Methodist churches at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Methodism. Anyone interested in taking part in such a group should indicate their interest there. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 15:25, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Methodist work group 

message: What people go for is probably the doctrine, yet it is not stated what it is.Bettering the Wiki (talk) 02:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doctrine? 

message: Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:18, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Any connecction?

message: What happen to this Church?  Did Pastor Denise Johnson move to another location? 174.95.191.218 (talk) 14:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any mention of Johnson in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 14:36, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Church
Talk:Agrapha

message: As this article currently reads, it is a lightly revised copy of the Catholic Encyclopedia article, written at the beginning of the 20th century. Research has continued since then, & according to Robert E. Van Voorst (Jesus Outside the New Testament [Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2000], p. 183) there are over 225 such quotations; one major collection would be the Gospel of Thomas. Sources that would repay investigation include: Joachim Jeremias, The Unknown Sayings of Jesus (2nd ed., London: SPCK, 1964); Otfried Hofius, "Isolated Sayings of the Lord" in New Testament Apocrypha, ed. Wilhem Schneemelcher, & English translation, ed. R. McL. Wilson (rev. ed. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1991) 1:88-91; William G. Morrice, Hidden Sayings of Jesus (London: SPCK, 1997); William D. Stroker, Extracanonical Sayings of Jesus (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1989). -- llywrch (talk) 04:44, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources for bringing this article up to date 

message: Why have the sayings been written in King James English? No-one actually speaks like that anymore (and they certainly weren't written like that). --Scherben808 (talk) 15:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Style of agrapha
Talk:Alleanza Cattolica

message: Agostino Sanfratello, from Piacenza, and Franco Maestrelli, from Milan, in January 1971 were the first to request a referendum against the divorce law at the Court of Cssation. The magazine of the group "Cristianità" was born in 1973 (Oscar Sanguinetti and Pierluigi Zoccatelli "Costruiremo ancora Cattedrali. Per una storia delle origini di Alleanza Cattolica" publisher Rich1956f (talk) 19:23, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: publisher D'Ettoris, 2022) Rich1956f (talk) 19:24, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The referendum against the divorce law
Talk:Altar stone

message: Side altars are now frowned upon??? Ok, they are not used as much, but frowned upon?? Where's the reference for this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.9.232.39 (talk) 11:32, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

message: The following is stated:
With regard to relics of saints, it says:
Canon 1237 §2. The ancient tradition of placing relics of martyrs or other saints under a fixed altar is to be preserved, according to the norms given in the liturgical books.
- but it doesn't make clear whether or not relics are mandatory in a fixed altar. Francis Hannaway 19:29, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarity 
Talk:Apostolic vicariate

message: In the list of vicariates, should the names be "Vicariate Apostolic" or "Apostolic vicariate" of such-and-such? In the Philippines it is "the Apostolic Vicariate of..."  Why is it different here?  If we are to create internal links and articles shouldn't we be consistent? --Bruce Hall (talk) 03:25, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: "Vicariate Apostolic" or "Apostolic vicariate"?

message: should probably include something on the context of the spread of apostolic vicariates globally. having to to with the papacy's efforts from the 17th century on to win back somce control of the Catholic Church from the colonial powers by creating new episcopal jurisdictions, often rivalling ones already established under imperial political authority (e.g. the portuguese padroado, spanish patronato)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:D:D180:868:4F3:D6B8:2CA3:B33C (talk) 16:22, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: history

message: Should the statement that "inactive apostolic vicariates ... are in italics" be taken to mean that this list should include historical apostolic vicariates like that "of the District of London" or "of Newfoundland"?--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 02:09, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  inactive in italics 

message: Historically, there have been circumscriptions that were designated as 'apostolic pro-vicariates', such as:
*Apostolic pro-vicariate of Mysore, India (1845)
*Apostolic pro-vicariate of Vizagapatnam, India (1845)
*Apostolic pro-vicariate of Coimbatore, India (1845)
*Apostolic pro-vicariate of Cooktown, Australia (1876)
*Apostolic pro-vicariate of Unyanyembe, Tanzania (1887)
Perhaps this article should say something about pro-vicariates too. The Discoverer (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pro-vicariates 

message: With today's appointment to Camiri, it now appears that new Vicars Apostolic will not be named to titular sees. I have not been able to confirm a policy change. But this is the 2nd one this month with no titular see noted. --Dcheney (talk) 11:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Titular Sees?
Talk:Arma Christi

message: Really Instruments of the Passion (redirects here) is much more common, surely?  Crude ghits: "Arma Christi" 65K and "Instruments of the Passion" 282K. I will move in a few days if no one objects. Johnbod (talk) 14:50, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I would support this move. GrindtXX (talk) 16:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename