lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Anne Horton

message: She was never "Lady Anne Horton" or "Lady Anne Luttrell", as her father was not created Earl of Carhampton until after her marriage to the Duke of Cumberland. Opera hat (talk) 13:06, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: WRONG. DBD 08:27, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Would you care to expand on that? She married the Duke on 2 October 1771 . The Viscount Carhampton was created Earl of Carhampton on 23 June 1785 . That means that at the time of her marriage she was The Hon. Mrs Christopher Horton. Opera hat (talk) 20:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wow, someone looks a fool. And it's me. Good spot mate! DBD 10:39, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: :::What does "rather loose with her favours" mean? Is it possible to be more specific? This is meant to be an encyclopedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.240.61.2 (talk) 05:55, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  It means "promiscuous", but it doesn't imply that the promiscuity extended to frank sexual intercourse. Since we don't know for certain if Walpole meant that she was having sex with these men - Johnson called him a prig, so he might have meant it in another way - "promiscuous" might not be the correct word. The phrase "loose with her favours" is standard English and has been for centuries; I'm surprised you haven't, er, come across it. --NellieBly (talk) 06:06, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It's archaic English and it reads like Victorian prudery.  If that's what's meant here then it should be spelled out.  If it's a direct quote from Walpole then it should be in quote marks. --Jfruh (talk) 15:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Duke of Grafton's Mrs Houghton

message: The article says: "The house became an alternative court as the Duke was in open dispute with his parents." Should this read "brother"? His father died 20 years before his marriage, and his mother only a few months afterwards, and his brother was king during this period. --Jfruh (talk) 00:44, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dispute with his parents"
Talk:Sir Cumference

message: Sir Cumference was the name of a character in the 1946 Disney cartoon A Knight for a Day, in which he was a jousting opponent of Goofy (here named Cedric).  There was also a character named Sir Loinsteak.  Kostaki mou (talk) 22:03, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Previous use of the name 

message: JoeNMLC (talk) 18:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Orphan article message
Talk:Nitisinone

message: We need to mention its ocular side-effects.
 is a study of its pharmacology. Needs to be included. JFW | T@lk 20:11, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done! Added negative side effects. Will be adding more information shortly. Jakebarrington (talk) 14:10, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pharmacology
Talk:Nonbenzodiazepine

message: It appears that two drugs that are placed into the pyrazolopyrimidine section in this article are misplaced. Both panadiplon and taniplon do not actually have the same skeletal structure as the rest of the pyrazolopyrimidines (panadiplon has an imidazopyrazine core and taniplon has an imidazopyrimidine core, both have an oxadiazole moiety attached). As well, some of the drugs listed in the cyclopyrrolone class do not appear to have that structure (pagoclone and pazinaclone are both missing the nitrogens in the 6-membered ring, and suproclone and suriclone have sulfurs in place of those nitrogens), though all of them appear to be classified as cyclopyrrolones despite the discrepancy in structure. I'm not sure if this is anything that should in fact be changed (e.g. if the compounds in question should be moved to the "other" section) but I felt it noteworthy enough to mention here. Lumberjane Lilly (talk) 23:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slight miscategorization
Talk:Nordazepam

message: About the abuse section? Hello? Interpreting these results are meaningless, what are therapeutic and for who? dose is err very dependant on the person taking it, also tolerance with say... chronic users? So dose does not mean much. Well, come on, this needs cleaning, or at least a professional, augh, I'll just get my MD and come back change the entire article.Rodidrepnu (talk) 14:53, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

message: "Abuse
Nordazepam and other sedative hypnotic drugs are detected frequently in cases of people suspected of driving under the influence of drugs. Other benzodiazepines and zolpidem and zopiclone are also found in high numbers of suspected drugged drivers. Many drivers have blood levels far exceeding the therapeutic dose range suggesting a high degree of abuse potential for benzodiazepines and zolpidem and zopiclone.[3]
"
What does zopiclone and zolpidem have to do with nordiazepam?! This is off topic and contains some irrelevant references and some of it is completely repetitive.--Jmcclare (talk) 03:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. This section is off-topic and lacks neutrality. I have no access to the cited article, but if it does not mention Nordazepam by name, the citation needs to be scrapped. If the citation is scrapped, the Abuse section needs to be reworked around data from a more relevant article, or also scrapped.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.4.136.161 (talk) 07:49, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abuse Section 

message: Where are the numbers for the half life of nordazepam coming from?  This is the metabolite that is supposed to give diazepam its huge half life.  I think the half life for this is 36 - 200 hours and the half life for diazepam (i imagine a number extrapolated from its major metabolites) is 20 - 100.
I would like to see a citation linking the half life of this major metabolite to the given number which i think is wrong as it stands.  However i can't change it because i can't find a suitable citation for it and i'm NOT in to editing Wiki pages.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.13.18 (talk) 16:10, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for bringing this to the wikipedia community's attention. What do you think that the correct half life is? I have changed it to say 36-200 hours and used Prof Ashton's half life table as a reference. There will be some variation on half life depending on the source used, mainly because individual clinical studies will find different lows and maximum half life due to patient variability, although the studies are universal in that desmethyldiazepam (nordiazepam) has a very long elimination half-life.--Literaturegeek | T@1k? 23:47, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm supposed to be studying for an exam and checked here on Wikipedia...according to my lecture notes, nordazepam is metabolised to oxazepam. I was really hoping Wiki could back it up, but obviously still a lot of work to be done. I might come back here when exams are finished.123.211.190.87 (talk) 09:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Half life?
Talk:Norethisterone acetate

message: …of the ethynyl group. The image shows the opposite stereochemistry at this tertiary alcohol, relative to Norethisterone, its supposed parent molecule (used to prepare this simple acetate ester derivative). Is the drug sold as a single enantiomer or diastereomer? Is the image that appears taken from or based on the drug label/package insert? At this stage, apart from confirmation, this structure should be considered suspect.  Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 01:46, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please verify the stereochemistry
Talk:Operating System Embedded

message: "Enea OSE is one of the most widely used RTOSes in the world. According to mobile analyst firm, VisionMobile, OSE has been deployed in over 1.75 billion mobile handsets, as of the end of June 2010."
The citation for this information links to a webpage that describes the market share of phones and their OSs. And not once is OSE mentioned. In fact I was unable to find any information about what phones OSE ships on, only that it supports phone chipsets. It is possible that the numbers are cumulative over the course of OSE's existance, either way the citation is wrong. 
It certainly does seem that this page is a false advertisement. It should be removed, someone who has better information about this company's OS can be free to redo the page but for the mean time it's lies do not need to be here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.149.76.38 (talk) 17:36, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation is wrong
Talk:Novobiocin

message: Can anyone else confirm that novobiocin is not an aminoglycoside antibiotic that targets protein? The recent changes made to this article are quite dramatic in replacing the earlier content. -- Permafrost 11:20, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content 

message: Within the article is the statement Novobiocin is an aromatic ether compound.
I don't see any ether groups.  I see a coumarin group and an acetal group.  I am hesitant to remove this statement because it has been in the article so long.  Does this statement have any biochemical meaning that I am unaware of, or should it be removed? 66.166.38.18 (talk) 16:17, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Go ahead and remove it. Describing a benzopyrone as an "aromatic ether" is inaccurate. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 16:45, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Structure 

message: There were errors in this article.  This was discussed in Journal of Chemical Education .  The article was corrected by Mandlerm on 29 September 2016. --Taweetham (talk) 02:31, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors mentioned in JCE
Talk:Nurofen

message: Merge. The two articles are describing a product with the same brand name. Although it's a different formulation (i.e. contains different drugs), the articles should be merged, much like the NyQuil article. Fuzzform (talk) 23:50, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge suggestion

message: This article seems to be a blatant advert - Wikipedia:Spam!!  This article needs deleting.  78.32.143.113 (talk) 08:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Blatant advert?

message: The citation does not appear to support the comment. What it does say didn't seem really notable anyway. Just that they didbn't find any in Ireland and don't sell the type of packs affected there either.  Off2riorob (talk) 13:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  brought from the article  

message: Words like "slick marketing practices" seem a bit inappropriate from a point of view aspect.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.172.36.45 (talk) 04:02, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: POV
Talk:Ocrelizumab

message: Someone deleted most of my update :
 "On October 8th, 2015, Genentech announced the results of three large Phase III clinical trials. Ocrelizumab (given as 600mg IV every 6 months) was shown in the OPERA I/II trials to reduce multiple sclerosis relapses by 47% (and also slowed progression of the disease) when compared to Rebif (a thrice weekly injection).First Data From Ocrelizumab Phase 3 Studies in MS. Oct 2015 In the ORATORIO trail for primary progressive MS ocrelizumab (600mg IV every 6 months) slowed the progression of the disease by 24% compared to placebo. Genentech expect to apply for European marketing authorisation in early 2016." 
saying "need a better ref than a paraphrasing of a press release". 
It might have been more constructive to look for, or ask for, a better reference rather than deleting useful material. The 'press release' got wide coverage (eg ,  and reports on MS charity websites). ECTRIMS Conference commentary abstracts : ORATORIO, OPERA I/II. I wonder if these would be considered better enough. Academic journal reports should be available within a few weeks of the conference. - Rod57 (talk) 12:05, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  questionable deletion 

message: I just modified the intro, written by someone else, about the 65.000$ price tag, and added the per-year information. However had, this actually already came up twice within the same article, so this is a bit redundant. I'd suggest that the intro part about the price, is moved into its own subsection within the article, rather than be there at the very start of the article. Right now we have had the same info two times and it should suffice to have it only once. 2A02:8388:1641:4700:BE5F:F4FF:FECD:7CB2 (talk) 16:41, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Please see WP:LEAD. The lead summarizes the body; it will have repetitions. Jytdog (talk) 06:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cost of the drug being mentioned and the general Article Layout
Talk:OKT3

message: I think this article should be merged with this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muromonab-CD3 Hnc 00:26, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger?

message: This bot has detected that this page contains an image, :Image:MonoclonalAb.jpg, in a raster format. A replacement is available as a Scalable vector graphic (SVG) at :File:Monoclonal antibodies.svg. If the replacement image is suitable please edit the article to use the vector version. Scalable vector graphics should be used in preference to raster for images that can easily represented in a vector graphic format. If this bot is in error, you may leave a bug report at its talk page Thanks SVnaGBot1 (talk) 14:20, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Image:MonoclonalAb.jpg]]
Talk:Orajel

message: How does Orajel work? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.198.116 (talk) 02:20, August 6, 2007
:Go look on the page of its ACTIVE INGREDIENT, benzocaine. Mr. P. S. Phillips (talk) 05:40, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does it work?
Talk:Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical

message: User:Chefmikesf, it looks like this division is also no longer active, and should not be included in the J&J template or moved to the "former subsidiaries" section. The website http://www.ortho-mcneilpharmaceutical.com/ is offline. - Indefensible (talk) 01:42, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct
Template talk:Help contents back

message: :Related: Why aren't the subpage-indicator-breadcrumb links appearing, at pages like Help:Contents/Getting started? Is that a help namespace peculiarity or something? (I mean the links "up" that appear underneath the "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" at pages like Wikipedia:Community Portal/Redesign and Talk:Albert Einstein/Comments.)
:If we had those, this template would probably never have been invented. --Quiddity 04:33, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Reverted. This may annoy those who like to do things the "clever" way, but please consider all skins, internet browsers etc, before changing something as visible as this template. – Tivedshambo (talk) 07:51, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The breadcrumbs appear for me now, wonder if they've been fixed since previous comment, if so we could do away with the 'back' template on the contents subpages. Lee∴V (talk • contribs) 17:14, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Must have been. Breadcrumbs appear properly here now, for me too. Agree with deprecation/deletion/removal. -- Quiddity (talk) 18:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: back button vs breadcrumbs
Talk:Fire-control radar

message: to give background to its developmentGraemeLeggett (talk) 17:14, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  needs a history section 

message: This is great for people who already know about the SPG-53, but not so useful for "everyone else." What does the SPG-53 detect? Does it detect ships? submarines? torpedoes? indirect fire? is it a surface to air? surface to surface? surface to (under the water)? --Lacarids (talk) 18:15, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simple English Please!
Talk:Ease (programming language)

message: I don't think that this description of Ease is accurate.
--75.36.140.39 23:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Subordinate processes stop if they attempt to interact with a context that has completed because the parent process has stopped. This enables speculative processes to be created that will finish if their result is not needed."
shouldn't this be "speculative processes to be created that will not finish"? Bayle Shanks (talk) 02:08, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  speculative processes
Talk:Eastgate, Chester

message: I've no objection to combining the subjects, but the current title needs changing. Who would ever search for this? I would suggest Eastgate, Chester (currently the page is not listed at the large Eastgate disam page) with Eastgate clock remaining as a redirect (no cap., just as it should be, but one with the cap could be added). Johnbod (talk) 20:46, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems reasonable to me. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:58, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: And to me. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 09:48, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: And me. Dave.Dunford (talk) 13:28, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks; done, Johnbod (talk) 15:35, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Talk:Life Assurance Act 1774

message: I have failed this because first, it just didn't feel comprehensive enough. I'd like to see some documentation that this problem was on the government's mind before the act was passed. The article tells us people were using life insurance to evade gambling laws ... had there been public complaints about this? Did people sometimes murder the unrelated third parties to collect? There's a lot that comes to mind. And what of when it came to pass? Did Parliament pass it unanimously? Was there debate? Who was against it, and why might they have been? These questions beg to be asked. And is there more to its subsequent jurisprudence than we see? How readily was it accepted?
It's also missing some citations. "it has since been held as the definite expectation of suffering a financial loss directly due to someone's death." When? By whom? Also, it is not enough that other articles on court decisions and sources exist ... we need to see the citations here.
When these are fixed, and someone is seriously working on this, it can renominated. Daniel Case 05:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ricchi e Poveri

message: Menudo did not sing 'Sarà perche ti amo' (Sera porque te amo), this song was sing by the Venezuelan boy group Los Chamos, which is similar to Menudo. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrD4kAhpREg&feature=related  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.189.181.139 (talk) 20:21, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 1
Talk:Una Vincenzo, Lady Troubridge

message: I seem to be having touble editing this article to make it more meaningful :( Fluffball70 23:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I'm sorry to be so abrupt, but I wanted to clean up the factual errors in this as quickly as possible since it is linked from the front page.  I'll be happy to explain anything further, but basically everything I changed is based on the sources cited in the article on The Well of Loneliness, mostly the biographies by Baker, Cline, and Souhami and Laura Doan's book Fashioning Sapphism (which all agree on the essential points).  In particular, that book reviewer for The Independent totally made up the claim that Una somehow became lesbian because her husband gave her syphilis -- it's certainly not in the biography by Diana Souhami that he's reviewing.  It's doubtful she even knew she had syphilis until after she had already been "diagnosed" as an invert by her therapist. —Celithemis 06:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emergency surgery 
Talk:Traffic wave

message: I tried to find sources for the downstream waves, or the “pinned” waves, and solitons. Not quite sure if these really can exist in the way that the entry is written. Solitons are travelling solutions, but not necessarily stationary as in fixed to a spot on the road. The key issue here seems to me that the text currently is ambiguous when it refers to a wave “relative to the motion of the cars themselves”. What does that mean? Relative to speed of the cars, or relative to the direction of the cars? If speed is what is meant, then the wave cannot travel faster, that is considered unphsysical in the traffic flow literature Daganzo C.F
1994 The cell transmission model: a simple dynamic representation of highway traffic. Trans. Res. B. 28, 269–287. doi:10.1016/0191-2615(94)90002-7. 
I think the author probably intended to say that the wave can go in the same direction of the cars, and by the same token, occasionally be “pinned”. The word “pinned” is an unfortunate choice of words as the text seems to refer to a wave that travels backward (relative the moving traffic) with the same speed as the traffic is moving forward. But that is a coincidence, the wave is not really stuck to a spot on the road. If the unfortunate words "motion" and "pinned" are removed, then the text can be fixed. I have done this, hoping that it makes the entry better, and it can be taken of the "original research" list. I am not an expert on this though, is anyone in a position to comment on my suggested change? 
There is a lovely picture in Wilson, R. E. (2008). Mechanisms for spatio-temporal pattern formation in highway traffic models. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 366(1872), 2017-2032. (Fig 1). The paper is open access under research http://information.bristol.ac.uk/files/3007542/ptroysoc-v8.pdf but I presume the figure is under copyright. Anyone aware of something similar that can be put in?
Thank you 
Pips15 (talk) 21:40, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Downstream waves and solitons

message: Could someone translate Grüne Welle from german into this article? Antagonist 23:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That article relates to the Green wave, so any translation may be most appropriate there.  I may tend to it someday, but I've plenty of other things to do first.  Green waves are a type of traffic wave, but specifically applied to traffic signal timing.  --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 22:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Green wave

message: I tried fixing the link on the "Traffic wave" page but it was removed by a bot and I got a message.
The link to "Trafficwaves.org" goes to a hosting company.
I did not think that this fit in with the Wikipedia philosophy.
50.133.5.126 (talk) 03:27, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fixing a link
Talk:Pefloxacin

message: These edits are a major revision of this article as requested by the insertion of a rewrite tag last year.  Additional work will be done to correct any inadvertent errors, citation errors, etc.  Please post any comments on this talk page for discussion before editing this article.Davidtfull (talk) 19:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

message: Just wanted to post a thank you to all who have been watching the fluoroquinolone articles develop and for the time they have spent repairing spelling and grammar errors and the like.  Much appreciated.  We are working on all of the fluoroquinolone articles to bring them up to date and are following a similar format for all of them.  Any suggestions would be appreciated and invite those who are helping to post such suggestions on the various quinolone talk pages for consideration.  Again, thanks for your efforts here folks.Davidtfull (talk) 20:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Thank you

message: It had been stated that: there is a long-standing saying in Wikipedia (it may even be codified somewhere) that "redirects are cheap".  Therefore it had been suggested that: redirects for trade names are a more appropriate solution than in-article "laundry" lists, because 1) they avoid clutter in the article body, 2) they prevent issues such as an ever-growing list that may be "expanded" with inaccurate information and 3) they make it much easier for someone looking for a particular generic formulation of the drug to get to the actual article.  Since this suggestion is both practical and logical I have removed the list of trade names and used redirects instead.  As such someone searching Wikipedia using a brand name would simply be taken directly to the levaquin article. 
I would now ask that editors not expand the trade name list, but create redirects instead.  Those not familiar with this process may find the following article helpful:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirect
Davidtfull (talk) 01:32, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: trade names