Talk:Human Accomplishment

message: Archimedes is inferior to Fibonacci??? --Michael Hardy 17:09, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Not by my reading. Looking through the appendix for the mathematical inventory, they both have index scores of 33. --maru   (talk)  contribs 20:05, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scores 

message: There was no music before Monteverdi?  What about the massive achievements of Josquin, Palestrina, Machaut, Ockeghem?  That list really presents a 19th-century POV.  It made me laugh out loud.  Those who carried the Franco-Flemish style to the rest of Europe, and who invented the art of counterpoint, are the ones who made the later achievements possible.  Is this guy for real?  What sources is he using?  --Antandrus  (talk) 23:38, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps I am simply unusually ignorant of music, but I haven't heard of a single one of those people listed in your second sentence. --maru   (talk)  contribs 07:48, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Musicians 

message: Is there such a category?  This books seems the definition of the term.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor437 (talk • contribs) 23:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, Luddites are people who don't read books but still have a strong prejudiced opinion -- you know, one not based on any facts, only prejudice. Lkoler (talk) 05:38, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Murray a Philistine

message: You may find it helpful while reading or editing articles to look at a bibliography of   Intelligence Citations, posted for the use of all Wikipedians who have occasion to edit articles on human intelligence and related issues. I happen to have circulating access to a huge academic research library at a university with an active research program in these issues (and to another library that is one of the ten largest public library systems in the United States) and have been researching these issues since 1989. You are welcome to use these citations for your own research. You can help other Wikipedians by suggesting new sources through comments on that page. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk) 14:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intelligence Citations Bibliography for Articles Related to Human Intelligence 

message: What's the rationale for filling the article with so many tables from the book? Wouldn't that information be a lot more compact as paragraphs of text? (And is it really all necessary in an article about the book?) -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 01:16, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Way too many tables 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Human Accomplishment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050928181840/http://www.cato.org/events/031028bf.html to http://www.cato.org/events/031028bf.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified