lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Discourse on judgmentalism

message: The spelling for the title of this article is incorrect. The correct spelling is judgmentalism--no "e".Jlujan69 01:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling

message: I think the difference in interpretation of this passage between liberal Protestants, conservative Protestants and the Roman Catholic Church is who gets to judge what, and whether the judging body is an organization, a group of people or merely an individual. Because of obsequium religiosum, the Catholic Church gives full religious and intellectual assent to the administrative judgements of the Pope and the Magisterium.  Every local bishop functions like the angels of the Apocalypse and instructs his diocese. Furthermore, the doctrinal organization of the Church is called the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which gives appropriate responsa on matters religious and moral and sometimes pronounces excommunications. Therefore, the question of judging is really an organizational and ecclesiological question, in that it largely depends on how the Church or religion is internally structured. ADM (talk) 05:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Personal condemnation vs. Church condemnation

message: This page has very many numerous problems.
#Complete lack of inline citations.
#Original research or unverifiable claims
#non NPOV
#Long intro needs to be converted to body with summary in lead.
#(I removed External Link from main text to bottom)
#Notability? There is already a page on The Mote and the Beam
Serious thought needs to be given to deletion or merging elsewhere.
Thanks for caring.172.163.76.28 (talk) 09:48, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Who am I to judge this? ...kiddng... But I marked for merge. Matt 7:1-5 is shared in both, so no debate is needed. History2007 (talk) 06:07, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. Looking at the edit history, this page was merged from 5 separate pages dealing with each verse by itself, but the individual verse pages have since been resurrected, with a massive amount of duplication and overlap. There doesn't seem to be much communication between the left hand and right hand.<BR />–Telpardec (talk) 13:55, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case per WP:SNOW I think they can be merged. Please feel free to merge if you like. History2007 (talk) 14:09, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. It's been another week, so merging... —Telpardec (talk) 21:30, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal (Multiple issues)
Talk:DEP

message: ----
There was an internal external link on this disambiguation page:
* Digital Experience Podcast
According to Wikipedia:Disambiguation, disambiguation pages should refer only to other Wikipedia pages. I deleted it from the page. There was no Wikipedia page for this topic. Chimpex 01:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Likewise, I just deleted Device Enrollment Program. –173.56.25.136 (talk) 06:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

text: He no longer appears on the list. –173.56.25.136 (talk) 06:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

text: To cover this abbreviation, I just added a link to Deputy. —173.56.25.136 (talk) 06:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Uzhhorod International Airport

message: Please make the formating of this article closer to the standarts of Wikipedia. It looks awkward...Thanks
Sakura-org 18:45, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have copyedited the article and fixed it up a bit. —dima/s-ko/ 03:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Can somebody more experienced explain me why there is a big gap (space) in this article between two paragraphs??? --Sakura-org  talk  18:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Help
Talk:Canada's Food Guide

message: This article needs a note about criticism. The most obvious example for me is that the idea that we need that much dairy in our diets is probably a sham encouraged by the dairy industry. Some dairy products are healthy and milks and yoghurts and cheeses aren't necessarily unhealthy, but it's generally accepted, I think, that North Americans eat way more cheese than they should. Also that same market is supersaturated with dairy, suggesting good reason to encourage its consumption.
If I really have to I can find some sources, but it's pretty obvious. I'd just like to see some mention of criticism made a little more explicit. --Jammoe (talk) 02:59, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, you do have to find sources. Preferably double-blind experimental studies. And make sure they properly address calcium & vitamin D requirements. 69.196.178.87 (talk) 00:27, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism 

message: The article refers to "servings" - this is too vague. Wouldnt it be better if the quantuty in grammes or ounces was given. 89.242.99.255 (talk) 16:33, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Have a look at serving size.  The vagueness is due to the inescapable fact that a "serving" of bread is not the same size as a "serving" of milk or a "serving" of butter.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:30, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  The Canadian Food Guide defines it's own version of what constitutes a serving, for each group. See here: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/food-guide-aliment/index-eng.php  69.196.178.87 (talk) 00:27, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vague amounts 
Talk:The Geese & the Ghost

message: Planned to be released in 2007?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.158.152.206 (talk) 11:19, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

message: Odd that the timing of the recording of Phil Collins' vocals is not mentioned. I'll see what I can find. BillhomEls (talk) 11:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Mr Collins
Talk:Car phone

message: While the article has a couple of nice photos of car phones (one radio phone and a one 1G Cellular phone), it could really use two photos of each mounted in a car. I realize that this might be difficult to produce since no one uses the any more but maybe we could find either a creative commons photo or someone with an old vintage 80's era luxury car with one still mounted inside to provide us a photo, at least the cellular car phone. For the Earlier Radio Phone, that would be much more difficult though. One option would be to use a photo from an old TV shows or movie from the 60's or 70's as a number of them include wealthy guys with radio phones in their car, for example Cannon, the 70's detective show. I believe a film or movie screen shot is considered fair use in this context, though someone can correct me if I'm wrong.  --Notcharliechaplin (talk) 02:25, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs photo of both a Radio phone and Cellular car phone mounted inside a car. 

message: As usual the japanese article has some information about the development there. Seems that by 1961 they had a semi automatic system, becoming automatic in 1966. 
As usual any advancement that seems to come from the west should be first checked before if it was made in japan first.  As their higher IQ usually means they will always be ahead of the white man's conservative brain. 46.222.246.11 (talk) 07:10, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japan should be mentioned
Talk:HMS London (69)

message: The rebuilding of the superstructure of the battleship "Warspite" was a considerable success and there were plans to rebuild the county class cruisers along similar line. Due to the outbreak of war only the "London" was rebuilt but the rebuilding wasn't a success. In the hard steaming of war the deck was prone to cracking and needed frequent maintenance for this. A problem not encountered in the unconverted ships.
It was probably this problem as well as obsolete machinery that led to the decision to scrap this ship.AT Kunene (talk) 09:57, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Maintenance
Talk:Luke Hurley

message: Stub Sorting - How do I get this right. I have found the right section but not sorted alphabetically into the right location yet Jakemp50cz 02:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zaporizhzhia International Airport

message: I've seen two different logos for this airport. The one currently in the infobox is a blue circle with the IATA code OZH in it. There is an other one that shows a circular Ukrainian flag with an overlayed airplane (that has the Cyrillic text "AЗ" on the top wing). Both of these files cite , but I've only seen the first one (blue) used on that website. I'd assume that they just got a new logo, but I'm not sure. Wikidata uses only the second file, and the Ukrainian Wikipedia uses both of them. Also (and, this is less important), does anyone know what "AЗ" means? 
 
File:Малий_фірмовий_знак_міжнародного_аеропорту_«Запоріжжя»_(у_векторному_зображенні).svg
File:Логотип_аеропорта_Запоріжжя.jpg
⇒ Zhing-Za, they/them, talk 19:55, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone explain what the logo is?
Talk:Yrjö Sotamaa

message: This entry reads like a CV - and desperately needs editing and evenre-writing.--TTKK (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Northern Tablelands

message: I wondered about the name, geographic scope on this page. The name Northern Tablelands applies to that part of the New England Tablelands up to the border. The Tablelands then continue into Queensland as the Granite Belt, but its the same geographic formation. The Granite Belt page links to the New England (NSW Page) which is not the same as the New England Tablelands.
The Tablelands extend south of the Moombi Range. Inverell is normally included as part of the Tablelands, 
Jim Belshaw (talk) 08:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name, geographic scope 

message: That's pretty disgusting.  --Banno (talk) 08:59, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Walcha was the first part of the Northern Tablelands to be discovered in 1818"
Talk:Michele Giordano

message: What? Nothing about his being under investigation in 1998 for suspected involvement in loan sharking, in a scheme run by his brother, who served some time in prison along with an accomplice?  --  Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 02:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Money worries
Talk:Federal Correctional Institution, Thomson

message: Did Thomson Correctional Center close down in 2010? 173.162.252.241 (talk) 06:18, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Closed in 2010? 
Talk:Character sketch

message: I'd say that if there is going to be an example in this article, it should be a well written one. This one wouldn't fly in Simple English Wikipedia. (Nbmatt 02:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

message: This article does not cite specific books.  This is true.  This is also fitting.  Common knowledge, in academic parlance, is any fact or series of statements that is contained in three or more sources without deviation.  This article's definition of the character sketch is common knowledge.  Putting footnotes up in such an instance is not only not necessary, but actively discouraged, as it leads down the "Webster's defines 'bird' as any animal of the order avis'" pathway.  If anyone knows of a disagreement or divergent point made in this article, then a "citation needed" would be appropriate.  I.e. a reader should know of a thing that requires citation before slapping, "There are no citations!" tags on the article.  After all, the article lacks an infobox, too, but surely one of those is not necessary for every article on every subject in every instance!  Geogre 16:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References? Oh noes!
Talk:United Steelworkers v. Weber

message: Copy edit info for contest:
* File size: 40 kB
* Prose size (including all HTML code): 2939 B
* References (including all HTML code): 846 B
* Wiki text: 4281 B
* Prose size (text only): 1932 B (330 words) "readable prose size"
* References (text only): 45 B
--Mikemoral♪♫ 00:08, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:GOCE]] 
Talk:Manuel Centeno

message: How much money has Centeno won in his bodyboard carrear?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.130.89.85 (talk) 22:35, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: What's the point to indicate Manuel Centeno favorite people ? I am pretty sure it has nothing to do on Wikipedia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 176.79.187.68 (talk) 11:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia section 
Talk:Support function

message: A nice diagram would have an origin, a curve around the origin, and tangent planes drawn with rays from the origin to the planes. As I heard Strang put it today in a lecture, the support function is supporting the set with a bunch of planes. —Ben FrantzDale 02:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Diagram

message: : h(\mathbf{x})=\mathbf{x}\cdot N(\mathbf{x})\quad\forall \mathbf{x} on the perimeter of M.
How is the perimeter of a regular surface M defined? --Abdull (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perimeter 

message: * A figure illustrating the definition would be nice (similar to the one in Richard Gardner's book on geometric tomography)
* I was not sure about the use of support functions outside convex geometry. I therefore included the original definition 
for orientable manifolds under Variants. Anybody who knows more about this? (I am tempted to omit it completely)
* Are the Categories correct? I am a newcomer on wikipedia and haven't overview over the categories and their correct use.
* I avoided the notion of "convex body", as in the wiki-definition "convex bodies" always contain interior points and this is not needed here anywhere. 
Nysgerrig (talk) 15:32, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Unresolved issues
Talk:Whiteberry (music group)

message: Why is that irrelevant Myspace link there? I removed it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.99.151.251 (talk • contribs).
The html link is to an insurance company not to the bands webpage.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.249.240.84 (talk) 08:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: MySpace
Talk:Elizabeth, Louisiana

message: I removed the Famous people section because I am from Allen Parish and I have no clue who that person was, and I did a serch and found no information on him either. Doesn't seem very famous to me. If you wish to put him back, please provide proof that he deserves to be listed as a famous person. Stetsonblade 02:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Mary Anderson (inventor)

message: this iz really good info about mary anderson thank u 4 da info  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.171.245.101 (talk) 18:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have found conflicting statements for the date of Ms. Anderson's patent. Both obituaries (here and here) indicate the patent was from 1903, the first indicates it was a 17 year patent and the second that it ended in 1920, while the About.com story here states in the opening that the patent was in 1905 but in the text it states 1903. I have gone with 1903 for the time being as I am unsure of the RS status of about.com whereas a newspaper should be more reliable and there's two entries. If someone can find a better source for the date please add it. Stardust8212 23:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Patent

message: Is it just me or is there still garbage at the top of the page? --66.190.69.246 (talk) 22:57, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see garbage there. What are you seeing? --Orlady (talk) 00:17, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: ‘HOLA K ACEEEE ?? MIRA ETO O Q ACE?’ --66.190.69.246 (talk) 03:08, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That vandalism was fixed more than a week ago. It's not in the current version. --Orlady (talk) 04:23, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:   --66.190.69.246 (talk) 22:35, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: That webshot was taken during the one-minute period between the time the article was vandalized and the time that a bot reverted the vandalism. --Orlady (talk) 14:21, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
replies: text:  You do realize that I took that shot on the exact same day that I posted it here, right? (this shot was taken a few minutes ago). --66.190.69.246 (talk) 16:55, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  vandalism 

message: Some vehicles already had windshield wipers when Anderson supposed came up with her invention.  At least one patent predated hers by 5 or 6 years.
:216.152.18.132 (talk) 00:06, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Likely not the windshield wiper inventor
Talk:Camp Ellis

message: I've started Talk:Camp Ellis/Temp from scratch to replace the copyright violation.  It's more or less a stub, but has full sources and tags and can be used immediately. --Closeapple 12:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved into place. Thanks! --Alvestrand 17:02, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  New version of article 

message: Article is comprised largely of incomplete sentences and is rather confusing. It will take some time to re-write in a more complete sense. Some technical information in the article can be difficult to parce. Some major revisions may be necessary; I'll try to make some revisions myself but am interested to see others make sure I'm sticking to the true meaning of the article. Slowtationjet (talk) 21:31, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs re-writing
Talk:Municipal bond arbitrage

message: The information here seems like it might be useful and interesting, but it doesn't seem to be written for an encyclopedia.  Can someone translate this into more common English, and explain the terms better?
--Pordaria 02:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

message: To help it all sink in, can someone provide a mathematical example.
Thanks
This strategy is better understood by looking at the historical relationship of the hedges to the municipal bonds.  If you would like such information or would like to inquire more about the strategy, you can contact our office, as we manage such a strategy.
Does anyone know who writes these definitions for Wikipedia?  As a manager of this strategy for our own hedge funds, I was suprised to find this discription so accurate. Svsarka 19:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mathematical example
Talk:Tinkertoy

message: I thought the computer was at the science museum in Boston? Rkaufman13 15:57, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

message: How does the "Superstructs" toy line relate to Tinkertoy? It looks like Superstructs is a Tinkertoy clone. Did Tinkertoy patents expire? 131.200.248.39 (talk) 14:18, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Superstructs
Talk:Georgia Power

message: Much of the information provided on the History section of the page is either incorrect or incomplete, so much so that I believe it justifies a complete revision of the section.  I will revise it next week around this time unless there is anyone who has any objections.  I've determined that much of the information is incorrect based on information provided by the Georgia Power/Southern Company article on the New Georgia Encyclopedia website.  Eric0124 (talk) 16:11, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Drastic Revision of the History Section

message: I'm changing it in a weeks time if there's no objections. ( SailingOn (talk) 16:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changing KW to MW
Talk:Toque Profundo

message: Hey, some vital info is missing! "Dios Salve al Viajero" was part of the soundtrack of the movie Bitter Sugar and I'm pretty sure they were runner-ups in Benardom. I'll correct some minor gramatical errors but whoever wrote this did a very good job. Leña!
***philosopher2king 3/25/08  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Philosopher2king (talk • contribs) 07:04, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing Info
Talk:Kyle Rote Jr.

message: Came to the page out of soccer nostalgia and noted:
1) Text says he graduated from Highland Part HS
2) Link (which is broken) references Lake Highlands HS
They are not the same. I don't know enough background to know which is correct, so someone with knowledge should update one or the other.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ithinktfiam (talk • contribs) 20:20, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  but correctly?
Talk:Edwin Atherton

message: This article is sourced, Who's who is a legitimate source. 2.7.07
:Wikipedia has defined a proper policy for valid citations, kindly have a look at Wikipedia policy for citations.-- Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 11:43, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: This is information is not sufficient enough, It should be more, try to expand article according to Wikipedia policies with proper citations, if you allow my self I would be happy to help you and I can certainly help you in expanding it.-- Faizan Munawar Varya chat contributions 11:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Expanding required
Template talk:WikiProject Stub sorting-talk

message: Proposing merge to Template:WikiProject Stub sorting.  This template (Template talk:WPSS-talk) serves precisely the same function, is more functional in that it has useful wikilinking in it, but is weird-looking and not formatted like a normal Talk page header template. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 03:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: ===Wording===
Can you please make it so that the template specifically states:
This talk page is only for talking about XYZ. To propose a new stub type, please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject_Stub_sorting/Proposals.
... or something along those lines? As it stands right now, this template basically says "It might kind of be better to put your comment over here, but whatever. I don't care. It doesn't really matter anyway."
It really needs to be more informative and more commanding. Make it clear to the user that if they want to make a new stub template, then they should suggest it at the Proposal page instead of here.
It may also be a good idea to make this a general use template, so that any time there is a better place to say something than the current page, it will include a link to the alternate page.
===Usage===
You should probably also make it so that this is only to be used on talk pages for stub template categories, not the talk pages for the actual templates. Once the templates have been made, it won't ever have to be re-proposed, and proposed edits should be in the template's discussion page (like this one), so you won't need to go to the Proposals page anymore. I think  would be better for that.
Thank you.--98.114.243.75 (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs More Power! 

message: You should probably also make it so that this is only to be used on talk pages for stub template categories, not the talk pages for the actual templates. Once the templates have been made, it won't ever have to be re-proposed, and proposed edits should be in the template's discussion page (like this one), so you won't need to go to the Proposals page anymore. I think  would be better for that.
Thank you.--98.114.243.75 (talk) 18:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Usage