lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Academic major

message: Some of the course search engines are not user friendly--222.64.29.96 (talk) 23:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just let you know that..... 

message: This section is incredibly unencylopedic in tone and content, this article or any other is not supposed to be a how-to guide or instructional. 99.224.207.223 (talk) 02:00, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. An anonymous user, possibly a sockpuppet, restored User:Homo sapiens's deletion of it; I deleted it again. If someone tries to restore it again we can invoke the three-revert rule. –Ringbang (talk) 14:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Content under "Choosing a Major" 

message: 'most colleges and universities require that all students take a general core curriculum in the liberal arts' - sez oo? 109.158.3.26 (talk) 09:17, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unjustified claim 

message: Is there a more global way to put this? "From the 1860s" or something like that? 2600:1014:B136:225D:973:859A:814A:F8A7 (talk) 16:41, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "American Civil War"
Talk:Guastavino tile

message: Shouldn't most of this page be moved to Rafael Guastavino? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.147.48.75 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 7 December 2005
*Nope ----evrik (talk) 21:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We should have 2 articles. One for the Guastavino tile and one for Rafael Guastavino. Both are relevant articles. This way Rafael Guastavino will be shown at categories such as :Category:Spanish architects --Jordiferrer (talk) 16:07, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree, there should be two articles. One for the architect and one for the style. --Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 15:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rename

message: The article states that a vault was made by MIT students in 2012, but the paper (http://architecture.mit.edu/class/guastavino/resources/writings/ramage_text.pdf) is from 2004.
87.239.0.104 (talk) 19:31, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong year?

message: Neat subject!! There are some beautiful examples of similar constructions on the campus of Carnegie Mellon Univ in Pittsburgh. The architect was Henry Hornbostel, so it might just be a matter of similar appearances. Either way, this article deserves some nice color photos. PurpleChez (talk) 19:25, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Just stuff 

message: This article should change the term "catalan vault" and "catalan vaulting" by "tile vault". According to the book "Guastavino Vaulting-The Art of Structural Tile" by the researcher of the MIT John Oschendorf, the term "catalan vault" is "politically charged" and Guastavino never called his tile vaults as "catalan vaults" because when he emigrated to the US that name had not yet been invented.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.22.228.226 (talk) 15:44, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Guastavino never made "catalan vaults" 

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSUPgqsAJJk 67.163.169.252 (talk) 21:46, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found MIT video referenced in article, but didn't know how to appropriately link
Talk:List of cities and towns in Modern Greenland

message: In the data for populated localities on the Statistics Greenland site, Kangilinnguit is listed as a Station, not a settlement, yet it is included in the Wikipedia cities & towns list.  Pituffik also has a substantial population and is also listed on the Statistics Greenland site as a Station, but it is not included in the Wikipedia cities & towns list - in fact, it's listed as an abandoned settlement.  Does anybody know why this has been done this way?  Should Kangilinnguit be removed from the cities & towns list? Stamptrader (talk) 12:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Kangilinnguit]] and [[Pituffik]], settlements vs. stations 

message: From this list it appears that every settlement has discontinued using its former Danish name in favor of an Inuit name.  Is there any place still using its Danish name? 199.46.200.231 (talk) 20:43, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Has Inuit completely replaced Danish?
Template talk:S-inc

message: 
This template is protected, and should be tagged with , or another suitable protection template. Thanks – Qxz 19:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done; thanks. Flcelloguy (A note?) 20:26, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested edit 

message: Hello! Could someone replace the current version by that one please?
 |width="30%" align="center" rowspan="1"|Incumbent
|-



ro:Format:S-inc

I just enlarged the font size a bit (I think it needn't be thus small) and I removed the italic style. Louis88 13:33, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello? - Louis88 10:28, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Little alternation

message: Please update the code of this template with the following.  All current functions of the template will be retained but a new /doc pages has been added and two parameters have been added for better compatibility with certain templates.  Feel free to add the protected status back onto the template; the code below omits it.  Also, copy from the source code, not the view display.
|width="30%" align="center" rowspan="1"|
|-



–Darius von Whaleyland, Great Khan of the Barbarian Horde 16:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Cheers. --MZMcBride 03:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit Protected

message: Please change  to  for appearance sake.  I am doing it across the system since it seems to be the preferred format.–Darius von Whaleyland, Great Khan of the Barbarian Horde 00:00, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: or ? I fear that there are two conflicting rival common ways of doing this, and it may be better to wait for something to happen with respect to the merge request between them. --ais523 12:01, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Small edit

message: May request to add TBA for the upcoming TV/Movie will be air by the future. Thanks. ApprenticeFan talk contribs 02:40, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I don't understand. You'll have to be much more specific than that. Also, I suggest leaving a proposal here for a few days to allow people to comment before using . Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:14, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  TBA 

message: For organizations, please add:
 |extant=Extant
Thanks Greenshed (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extant organizations
Category talk:Fan films based on Star Wars

message: What do you think? E Pluribus Anthony 19:35, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Talk:Darth_Vader#RfC.2Fpoll:_Darth_Vader.2FAnakin_Skywalker_.E2.80.93_one_article_or_two_articles.3F|'''RfC/poll''' – Darth Vader/Anakin Skywalker: one article or two?]]

message: There should be a separate list for parody films and keep this one for regular films  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.165.246.181 (talk) 02:27, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  separate parody films
Category talk:Star Wars spin-off films

message: What do you think? E Pluribus Anthony 19:35, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Talk:Darth_Vader#RfC.2Fpoll:_Darth_Vader.2FAnakin_Skywalker_.E2.80.93_one_article_or_two_articles.3F|'''RfC/poll''' – Darth Vader/Anakin Skywalker: one article or two?]]
Talk:Altered Carbon

message: Should it really be said that "Broken Angels" is in the same world as Altered Carbon?
I think it would be more accurate to say the same universe, as they don't actually take place on the same world.
: World is not necessarily synonymous with planet.  Midgley (talk) 22:36, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Universe' or 'World'? 

message: I believe in the book it states that it is the early 26th century,
if anyone knows for sure. Does this require an edit?
:Blurb says 26th, yep. I seem to remember a more exact date in the book, but can't remember where.  Geoff B 17:37, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Having read all the books several times, I believe there may be discrepancies in the dates used by Morgan. I would love to have the time to do a close analysis of that, but he regularly uses the words "in the last five centuries" to describe the extra-solar era. Stroller (talk) 10:19, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  From 2560, "in the last five centuries" means anything from 2060 to 2159. --24.6.228.145 (talk) 01:42, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

text: It looks (highly infeasible though it would be, given that people don't know what year they wake up in when resleeved) as if people in the setting are fixed on old-style 2-digit years: "Yeah, well anyway. Back in the winter of '09, Ryker was chasing down some random insurance fraud" and "Ryker was set up by some high ranking arsehole who took a fall back in '09. And it’s true he upset a lot of people." Also "Winter of '28. They were up and down the cable trails, converting and, when that didn't work, burning villages." The Hendrix was established in 2087. Larkin & Green—Armourers since 2203 and their android since 2076. Kovacs's bluff was for "4th May 2207. Look it up. I had to go back a long way to dig this one up". It's complicated by the use of other measuring systems (after all, no world will orbit its star with the same period Earth orbits Sol, so Earth's "year" is arbitrary everywhere else) for example, "Bradbury, 2089 pre-colonial reckoning" and "Nadia Makita, born Millsport, April 18th 47 (Colonial Reckoning), died October 33rd 105." The the liveaction bungle "is set in the year 2384". Just something to think about. 58.168.36.55 (talk) 07:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year? 

message: This article doesn't say much about the plot - instead it's a synopsis of the novel. Usually I can rely on wikipedia to fill me in on any parts of the book I missed, so I sometimes refer to it to jog my memory about the plot. But this article is useless for that!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.189.178.251 (talk) 19:28, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot versus synopsis 

message: "Chalk Girl" by Carol O'Connell (2012) features a pair of characters named "Ortega" and "Riker". 121.44.118.124 (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homage 

message: Article text currently states Kovacs' partner Sarah was an ex-envoy.  I'd not got that from the books, did I miss anything there?  He was an ex-Envoy, of course, but I seem to recall she had not left Harlan's World. Midgley (talk) 22:42, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Envoys
Talk:Mark McFarland

message: A user from the IP address 71.178.163.6 continues to update NASCAR weekly-series championship area with undocumented information about Jim Dean.  Any information regarding 'tax evasion' or anything of the sort should be backed up with actual references, or user should be considered posting information that can be considered libel.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kenlax00 (talk • contribs) 15:05, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  NASCAR weekly-series championship content
Talk:Hague Service Convention

message: The Philippines has ratified the Hague Service Convention, which has since taken effect in the country on October 1, 2020. However, the map on the page does not indicate that the Philippines has ratified it. --Justinadriel (talk) 01:26, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Philippines' ratification was not indicated in the map 

message: This page: *Judicial assistance advice from the U.S. Department of State gives me a "Sorry, we couldn't find that page on travel.state.gov" message, but the link does not show up as bad on Wikipedia. Does the link work for anyone else? Steven McIntire ALLEN 06:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  bad link 

message: A Dutch translation of this would be: ‘Verdrag inzake de betekening en de kennisgeving in het buitenland van gerechtelijke en buitengerechtelijke stukken in burgerlijke zaken en in handelszaken’. Not sure how/where to add this to this page, but maybe someone else would like to? ~~~ M.J.W.B. (talk) 19:47, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: The official languages in which the convention was concluded were English and French. All other languages are translations. I don't think the need to be mentioned here... L.tak (talk) 21:44, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point! ~~~ M.J.W.B. (talk) 21:45, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dutch translation
Talk:Grandmasters (album)

message: I have proposed the rename to Grandmasters. The slash prevents wikilinking, and common naming convention is to use the title of the album, unless that article name is already in use, which it isn't really, the Grandmasters page already exists but is a redirect to Grandmaster, so we could use that and add a disambiguation if necessary. - N (talk) 20:09, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I added a section, which talks about the Inspiration and Title of the album. If there is any dispute with this, then let me know... (LonerXL (talk) 00:11, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Album name and theme
Category talk:Wikipedians in Norway

message: I find the term "Wikipedians in Norway" a wee bit misleading - I am certainly associated with Norway (being a native of Norway, etc.), but I am not usually physically in Norway. Would it make sense to create a subcategory called "Expatriates of Norway" or simply "Norwegian abroad?" We could come up with some pretty cool graphical image for it as well.  --Leifern 20:11, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Would be helpful indeed. I was born in Norway, and despite living in the Untied States still heavily define myself as a Norwegian. (USMA2010 20:15, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subcategorization?
Talk:Letters rogatory

message: I'd like to update the section about conventions. Its misleading as very few countries have a process which operates outside a convention. The main convention which covers letters rogatory being the Vienna convention on consular relations, and there ain't many countries that aren't a party to that. See for example http://diaspora.legal/index.php/it/practising-law/back-office/letters-rogatory/ 
Suastiastu (talk) 13:44, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conventions 

message: The correct term is "Letters Rogatory" not "Letter Rogatory"Suastiastu (talk) 13:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Letters Rogatory 

message: This is a circular definition about jurisdiction. In fact the position is that a Court will have jurisdiction depending upon its own constition and empowerment - the service of its process may be facilitated or permitted in many matters outside its jurisdiction. The assertion is unreferenced. Suastiastu (talk) 13:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Service of Process
Talk:Carnuntum

message: Added the following (per WP:BOLD); but I'm not sure about the proper formatting.  This link is to the Hulu video; the documentary is from 'ORF Universum' (couldn't find homepage):
Carnuntum: Metropolis in the Land of the Barbarians ~Eric F  
:Update:  A WP bot reverted my addition.  I just thought this might be a relevant addition; is it possible to do this correctly? ~Eric F 184.76.225.106 (talk) 02:52, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links
Talk:Ecash

message: Is pay pal actually e-cash, or does it just process credit card transactions?
:PayPal does more than just credit cards; I fund my PayPal account from my bank account. I'm not sure if it counts as e-cash, though, as all amounts are held in a national currency. Jobarts-Talk 12:53, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In my opinion PayPal is electronic payment not electronic cash --Markulf 09:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: PayPal

message: What would the ramifications be if there were a cryptographically backed Ecash system that held payer and payee untraceable to each other, to remote observers, and even to the issuing bank itself? Is this anything anyone has done or tried yet?
I only say because I think I may have stumbled upon a tech solution that would allow exactly that. I'm putting out a request for comments.
Thanks. :) Jesset77 10:36, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes this was done by David Chaum. In cryptography e-cash is quasi synonymous with anonymous e-cash which looks a lot like what you are suggesting. I will try to rewrite the entry to provide more information about anonymous e-cash, and will remove PayPal, as it is an electronic payment solution that has not too much to do with e-cash as such. --Markulf 09:50, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous Ecash 

message: I #REDIRECTed this to Electronic money, will merge anything relevent. - Ironic goat (talk) 21:46, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect 

message: The first senctence about "Gary Tilip with his partner, Stevhen Tigong" seems to be nonsense. Google for these names and you will find "near to nothing" results. --129.13.186.1 (talk) 11:58, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations? 

message: As far as I can see, the article explains insufficiently how the system worked. "eCash software on the user's local computer stored money in a digital format, cryptographically signed by a bank." - ok, and how did the money get in there? Was it obtained with the software as such? How could the customer refill his account? --KnightMove (talk) 20:11, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did it actually work? 

message: Wired  calls it " a truly anonymous payment system," Setenzatsu.2 (talk) 20:01, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anonymous or "anonymous" as bitcoin
Talk:Kate Orman

message: Can I just ask - why do so many people make jokes at Ms. Orman's expense? Is it because of something she did? Is she not a nice woman? SOMEONE, PLEASE TELL ME WHYYYYYYY!!!! NP Chilla 22:19, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's probably just good old fashioned Australian tall-poppy syndrome.  I knew Kate before anyone else in fandom, knew her as a person and not just as a DW writer, nearly 20 years ago and she was just great.  Very clever, very funny, and a Beatles fan (which counts for a lot).  I'm sure she never changed into a monster - and I'm sure that there's a strong streak of jealousy coming from anyone who makes jokes at her expense. Darcyj (talk) 07:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I remember that she was on Sale of the Century (Australian game show).. does anyone else remember this?
Clofts 09:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sale of the Century
Talk:Lance Parkin

message: I've searched but can't immediately find any source for Lance Parkin being critical of Cold Fusion, so I've removed that reference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.187.187.206 (talk) 02:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Graham Jones (director)

message: A page like this referring to a living person is confusing is another living person also has the same name. I am the author Graham Jones (28 books published). I want to make it clear this page is not about me. Every time I do that someone edits out my comment. Biography pages about living people are fine. But they need to be revised so that living people with the same names can be distinguished. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.136.194 (talk • contribs) 
:Ok, a couple of points (1) you claim you are an author called Graham Jones, that can't be proven but we assume good faith here; (2) other links you have placed on Wiki according to your edit record have also been removed by other editors, due to notability/value-add issues; (3) if you or other people with the name "Graham Jones" were notable under :WP:BIO then they/you would have a Wiki entry already, or could have requested it; (4) the other notable Graham Jones listed here before is now simply a link to another entry, and he creates more Google hits than you or the actor now listed. You could have placed a disambiguation point at the top, but seem to insist on externally linking the piece you put in the main page - making me think that you want to create coverage/link to your own site as opposed to mainly a point of clarity: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and does not add external links unless they add value to a reader of an article - see :WP:EXT. A number of ways to address your concerns - but first question: do you pass :WP:BIO? Rgds, --Trident13 13:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Graham Jones?
Talk:Marc Platt (writer)

message: I think this phrase might be a bit too strong to describe Platt's role in the creation of Rise of the Cybermen/The Age of Steel.  Of course, I don't know the details of the story's development, but the Tom MacRae interview in the latest DWM suggests that Platt himself may have had nothing to do with it — it might have been as simple as Davies and MacRae discussing Spare Parts, listening to it, using it as a springboard for a new story and then negotiating appropriate credit and compensation with Platt's agent.  Platt may have been consulted at some point, but the way MacRae describes it in the DWM interview doesn't indicate any personal involvement by Platt in the transformation of the audio drama set on Mondas, with the Hartley family, into a television drama set on a parallel Earth with the Tyler family.  (Although it's certainly possible to conceive of Mondas as a "parallel Earth", from a certain point of view — but I digress.)
I'm not sure of the best wording to note this, but I think "storyline input" isn't it. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 23:16, 4 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I couldn't think of a better way of describing it either. I'm happy to see it changed — I wasn't trying to suggest that Platt was personally involved, either. Angmering 06:53, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Storyline input"? 

message: From the Spare Parts article:
In his introduction to Big Finish: The Inside Story, Russell T. Davies called this story (along with The Holy Terror) "some of the finest drama ever written for any genre, in any medium, anywhere"
Praise doesn't come much stronger than that, so I'm mystified as to why Platt hasn't (thus far) written anything for the new Doctor Who series. Does anyone know if Davies has asked him to contribute - and if not, why not? 
I suppose it could be argued that Platt hasn't written much for television (compared to Paul Cornell for example), but then the same could be said of Rob Shearman. 217.155.20.163 20:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah but shearman was only asked to re-write a sroty, may Marks work wouldn't work well on TV or in the new series.--Wiggs (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why isn't he writing for the new series? 

message: Is there a reason this page doesn't have a link to the Marc Platt disambiguation page ( here, as there are at least 3 other well-known "Marc Platt"s? I got to this one by accident, looking for the producer, but even then, I thought he also had writing credits, so it seemed reasonable. Thanks.
47.155.101.30 (talk) 12:01, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation
Talk:New York Confidential (TV series)

message: ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 20:22, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

message: A request for comments has been started that could affect the inclusion 
or exclusion of episodes and characters, as well as other fiction articles. Please 
visit the discussion at 
Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(fiction)#Final_adoption_as_a_guideline. Ikip (talk) 11:26, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Request for comment on articles for individual television episodes and characters
Talk:Dahaka (mythology)

message: We need real references for this article, and badly. So far the only reference cited is Encyclopedia Mythica (which, by the way, some of the text here is a blatant copyviolation of), and that site is just amateurs writing things down and has been known for making huge mistakes before. They also do not provide any source for their claims in this article. Frequently when that cite does cite a source, it is a horribly outdated reference full of unsupportd speculation and nonsense. Please get information from real sources and not just copy whatever Encyclopedia Mythica claims. DreamGuy 20:24, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: References
Talk:Justin Richards

message: Do the Invisible Detective books warrant a page of their own (or seperate pages on the books)?
:*I think they do myself. DrWho42 18:12, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invisible Detective books 