lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:CSS McRae

message: This article has been automatically assessed for WP:SHIPS as stub-class because there is a stub template on the article page. HausTalk 22:49, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I am juicing up this article to make it more extensive background information to my additions to the "Battle of Fort Jackson, etc." article. I hope to add more photos, maps and other stuff from the OFN and other books in my library.
Frank (talk) 16:00, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding Navy photograph and References.
Talk:Ballast Island (Lake Erie)

message: It appears that the cited reference #1 actually refers to a "Ballast Island" that is located near Japan. 67.211.168.158 (talk) 19:31, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed! Thank you for pointing this out. Mbrickn (talk) 08:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad Citation 

message: I was just wondering why you  a hatnote pointing to the disambiguation page. By my understanding of WP:NOHAT, a hatnote isn't needed in this instance, due to the page already being at a qualified title. Please tell me if I'm missing or misunderstanding something though, or if there's something else that hasn't occurred to me :)
All the best. ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 19:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah yeah, I realized that was a mistake and forgot to remove it. Thank you for noticing!  Generalissima (talk)  21:15, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: no problem :) ‍—‍a smart kitten[meow] 21:20, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hatnote
Talk:Precordial catch syndrome

message: The article doesn't explain the term "precordial catch". That's a problem, I think.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.20.160.157 (talk) 16:00, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: It might be worth adding to the article somewhere.
There is a high frequency of precordial pain reported in patients who have a congenital absence of the pericardium (CAP), a rare and generally benign disorder. CAP can cause abnormal angina and dypsnea. 
Reference: 
Garnier F et al. "Congenital complete absence of the left pericardium: a rare cause of chest pain or pseudo-right heart overload." Clinical Cardiology. Feb 2010. 33(2): E52-7
67.194.6.89 (talk) 18:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible PCS relationship to congenital absense of the pericardium 

message: Per WP:MEDMOS it is fine to reference every line. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:33, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: agree w/ Doc James--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:13, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

text: It's fine, but it looks cleaner and less cluttered when you match the citation style most pages use RDXL (talk) 03:50, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Refs

message: Ever since I was a teenager I've had this thing where I get brief chest pain if I suddenly start heavy exercise (e.g sprinting); if I stop for minute or so, it subsides and then I'm fine. It's meant I've never enjoyed running, although happy with swimming, cycling, walking, climbing etc... anything where I can pace myself. Now I know what it is. Stub Mandrel (talk) 12:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Thank you WP

message: I actually found that bending over forward at the waist would permit me to (cautiously) take a full breathe without pain while in that position, and that would immediately end the "episode", even just a few seconds after it started, instead of being forced to breathe shallow for a couple minutes.
For a brief period in my life it was happening often enough that I got methodical about it and used every second of each episode to try a bunch of different things, and discovered this. It has always worked immediately since, though sometimes I need to be bent over "more" than other times (thus contracting the abdominal muscles more?? I have no idea) while attempting that full breathe. Maybe this can help someone or grow to a larger understanding. swincg (talk) 11:19, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Treatment"?
Talk:CSS Oregon

message: The text reads "When Confederate forces evacuated New Orleans in April 1862, Oregon was destroyed to prevent capture." However, the condensed-version in the History frame says she was "Scuttled in April 1862".
Which one is accurate ? 210.22.142.82 (talk) 08:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflicting reports ?
Talk:Christopher Cerf (producer)

message: Since the quote says that Cerf objected to the use of "songs from the children's show," the article should specify which tv program.
Also, is "softening the prisoners" an accurate description in light of the article's use of the terms "breaking the prisoner" and "break the will of"?   Ileanadu (talk) 14:58, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Objections to Use of Music in Interrogations
Talk:Industrial property

message: As problems concerning industrial property are currently gaining importance, partly due to the phenomenon known as globalization, I believe that the stub is in great need of expansion.
This expansion process should also include a revamp of articles concerning several related issues, including, but not limited to, intellectual property and unfair competition. Certain items currently discussed in these articles should be moved to the industrial property article, or, at the very least, should include a reference to it. The redirect from unfair competition to anti-trust should be reconsidered.
As to the stub, I propose a modification of the currently displayed definition of industrial property in several ways. 
Trademarks, patents and designs are not intellectual property rights, as the current definition suggests. This can be verified by reading the referenced articles on these ics. Also, industrial property is not limited to these three items, but includes certain aspects of unfair competition, technology and know-how transfer, trade secrets, as well as industrial espionage.--VLH 00:41, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [June 2006]
Talk:1997 National Hockey League All-Star Game

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:4649.gif, found on :47th National Hockey League All-Star Game, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 23:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:USS Queen of the West

message: The link refers to Grand Lake in Cameron Parish, but the text refers to the ship operating in the Atchafalaya. The link should either refer to the appropriate Grand Lake, or be de-linked.
RPellessier | Talk 06:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to wrong Grand Lake 

message: Ellet alleges the pilot was a rebel sympathizer (see cite in article or page 385 of "The Rebellion Record" By Frank Moore where Ellet's report is reproduced.).  It would be interesting to find out what became of Mr. Garvey- eg. if a court case was filed and the allegations were proven to be true.  The most I could say was "alleged"- because it is entirely plausible that Ellet was scapegoating.  -J JMesserly (talk) 17:52, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pilot who grounded the Queen before her capture
Talk:Ejection (sports)

message: This article does not cite sources for the proposition that certain sports have more ejections than other sports, or that baseball umpires are particularly quick to eject players.  Also, I'm not sure that some of the statements are actually correct (e.g. a player or coach may be ejected in any sport - really?  ANY sport?).  Finally, some relevant sports are probably omitted here; one that comes to mind is football (soccer); ejections in that sport are discussed at length in misconduct (football). --rhaas 00:47, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: This section lists Bobby Cox as holding the record for ejections, any source on this? --RedIsaac (talk) 20:26, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Baseball
Talk:Booterstown

message: I grew up in Booterstown. I remember that it was also a Roman Catholic (RC) parish (possibly also a Church of Ireland parish). It also always seemed, geographically at least, to have an identity crisis in relation to Blackrock it's southern neighbour. I think it was twinned, as one of the richest RC parishes in Dublin, with Kilinarden parish, one of the poorest RC parishes, also in Dublin. I recall, probably poorly, that this was to do with a left-leaning priest named Denis Carroll.--Ekilfeather 00:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: is working really well for me. It only works well though when there's a lot of content to justify the high level of structure. Booterstown probably does not yet have enough content but is getting there. Laurel Lodged (talk) 23:54, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: The Rathfarnham / Castleknock template
Talk:CSS Raleigh (1864)

message: I very recently travelled on the Southport to Ft Fisher, NC, ferry which is part of the NC Ferry System...In the passenger lounge was an artist's print (by an artist named Martin) that had a description of the CSS Raleigh. This paragraph stated the Raleigh was a "ram". It also described the battle about the same as this Wikipedia article. This was what prompted me to look it up on Wiki - just curiosity.
I am no naval historian, but I do not believe (going only by what that print stated)that the CSS Raleigh would have been a "steam sloop". Unless, of course, the artists print paragraph is wrong...There was also a tender named CSS Raliegh that served the Merrimac (Virginia) in the Norfolk area I believe, which is unrelated to this one. It sounds like a "sloop" type vessel.
Just wondering if anyone has addit'l info on Wilmington NC's particular CSS Raleigh. What kind of ship was it originally? It appears to be a custom built war vessel.
 Engr105th 04:23, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Steam sloop ?
Talk:Transformers: Generation 2 (comics)

message: Should be merged with Transformers: Generation 2- Bushido Brown 00:54, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:High-pressure steam locomotive

message: The entire body text of this entry appears to come from http://www.dself.dsl.pipex.com/MUSEUM/LOCOLOCO/hptech.htm
Just wanted to check to see if the author of the referenced page was the one who put it on Wikipedia before I follower up in WP:CP Spinolio 00:56, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copied?
Talk:Twisted Logic Tour

message: I saw one of their shows at Brisbane in Aus, and they didnt even play Twisted Logic, how can it thus be called the "Twisted Logic Tour"? Or were they trying to be ironic?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.3.37.52 (talk) 10:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Twisted Logic Tour, but no Twisted Logic

message: a) Man that show was awesome.
b) Does anyone know what the significance of the bear was during Talk?
c) How were the balloons a homage to the Flaming Lips?
I think all these questions need answering. Well, specifically the last two. Gorman 00:57, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  significance of the bear? 

message: Is there a DVD of this concert? --AAA! 02:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: DVD?

message: Regarding their tour dates...Did they play a show in Göteborg, Sweden around the end of December 2005 (very close to New Year's eve)? I was at the airport to fly back to the States and saw a Bizjet on the ramp painted up with the scheme "Twisted Logic Tour." I assumed they were there for a concert. But, perhaps their jet was just refueling.24.237.88.179 (talk) 17:20, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: TOUR DATES

message: https://web.archive.org/web/20070107202318/http://uk.coldplayshop.com/mall/productpage.cfm/Coldplay/200224/64004 GustavoCza (talk • contribs) 16:08, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tour book website sale
Talk:Chronocentrism

message: While I didn't make the article, it seems to be a notable concept by doing a google search.  I will clean up the article. Will you remove the speedy notice? --mboverload@ 01:03, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree and have removed the CSD tag. But this article needs sources asap, or it will be Prod'ed. Thanks, Gwernol 01:43, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  notable 

message: * I completely rewrote this page. I think the idea is an important one but the original article seemed to contain a lot of opinion and original research.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brainfood (talk • contribs) 10:20, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Overhaul

message: Pardon me, but what the fuck does that mean? EEng 01:20, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "towards more homogeneous temporal commons"
Talk:Sonnet 29

message: From the article: "The "turn" at the beginning of the third quatrain occurs when the poet by chance ("haply") happens to think upon the young man to whom the poem is addressed, which makes him assume a more optimistic view of his own life." Is he really talking about the young man here? He tells of his "Sweet love remembered", so maybe he's thinking of his mistress. Morrock 23:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Kering

message: I've added the tax evasion controversy again. Actually, it's not much of a controversy. In France (Kering is a French Group) everybody knows. Compare French Kering Article for more info. And stop ruining Wikipedia by censuring it to serve big corporate interests. Thanks! 
--  Naimadia 22:35, 08 November 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi user who's only interested in leading a French intifada on one page. I removed your contribution because, as it states, it is only a "possible" accusation. And by judging how you insist on pushing this possible accusation, the intent of vandalism appears obvious. Please come back when the justice will validate or invalidate this accusation, because with or without sources, Wikipedia can't gather all accusations thrown by anyone out there. Editive (talk) 20:57, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tax Evasion

message: I've added the direction board, regarding the french PPR wiki page. Please change if you think it's not correct, or if there has been some changes since february.
I've deleted Prada from the list of PPR's competitors, as the Prada group is no longer a true conglomerate (it's has currently sold or is selling it's last high profile labels).  If you're interested, you can read more about this on the section of the Prada article about the company "As luxury conglomerate."
--  Vincentanton 01:15, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Direction board

message: From luxury to sustainability section reads like an advertorial ,very little in the way of objectivity ,looks pasta  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2F0D:200:DB00:2DD6:A749:1A00:547A (talk) 11:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  ""From luxury to sustainability"" 

message: Internet leaning towards company owners being involved in Satanic Cult and witch craft for the masses behind there apparel. 2600:8807:A792:C200:C581:147A:F419:D6E2 (talk) 15:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cult 

message: Most companies don't have their foundations made into a separate article. I do think that it is best that Kering Foundation be merged into here; since it's also a more promotional article, much of it could be gutted. InvadingInvader (userpage, talk) 20:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 12:32, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger with [[Kering Foundation]]
Talk:Acanti

message: Because she was melded both physically and psychically to the Acanti prophet-singer, does that mean some of there traits have been passed down to her?
:Doesn't look that way. Her body was taken in by the Acanti and was restored to health and life, and then her psyche was transferred back to it. All Storm is left with, is the memory of the experience of her unification with the Acanti, but no traits remain in her person. CarelessTantrum (talk) 10:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is Storm part Acanti?

message: - J Greb (talk) 00:28, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image issue
Talk:CSS Tennessee (1863)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Not Moved - figure out what you want to do first  Mike Cline (talk) 13:24, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Requested move of associated disambig. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 13:38, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

text: Just a note of procedure. Since CSS Tennessee is a set index, the title of the new page should be List of ships named CSS Tennessee, not a disambiguation page. Set indices are not dab pages but list pages. Otherwise support move. Llammakey (talk) 13:59, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 8 March 2022
Talk:Battle of Camp Wildcat

message: Nice article, Scott. Please stop creating References and external links sections, however. They are separate concepts that should not be comingled. References are books and links used to create the article, the source of potentially footnoted citations. External links are interesting further info, the equivalent of Further reading, but for URLs, not books. Hal Jespersen 01:19, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the compliment on the brief article. I have changed the references and links per your idea. Scott Mingus 02:35, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Rs & Ls
Talk:Jim Wilson (wrestler)

message: Not possible for Wilson to have appeared on the Morton Downey Jr. Show in 1984 since the show ran from 1988-1989. Jim Wilson's episode aired in 1989 but since I don't have a source for it and the 1984 claim is unsourced, I will just remove it for now. 76.175.16.11 (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 06:09, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert Jastrow

message: This article does not reflect Jastrow's work -- or controversial views -- at all completely. What some ID people pulled out of a book he wrote doesn't reflect his own opinions. His life and work is interesting. 
If I ever get time, I'll do something. 
Zamia12 (talk) 19:06, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  '''Incomplete''' 
Talk:CSS Virginia II

message: In Coski's book he gives these specs:
* Overall length - 201'
* Armament 3 double-banded 7" Brooke rifles, 1 double-banded 10" smoothbore
:plange 18:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict in characteristics 

message: CSS Virginia 2 should redirect here -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 23:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirects

message: All the contemporaneous documentation I can find calls her Virginia. The "II" was apparently added much later in an effort to lessen confusion with the much more famous CSS Virginia. But, I don't think we ought to state incorrect information here just to reduce confusion. We can certainly add a note to explain the difference. Ruedetocqueville (talk) 20:00, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: She was never called Virginia II during the war
Talk:Ajit Jain

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: The Warren Buffett CEO: Secrets from the Berkshire Hathaway Managers", pages 69-70. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Diannaa (talk) 16:48, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 
File talk:Eight Allotropes of Carbon.png

message: I just love carbon. --Isequals 01:28, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Any particular reasons for your love of carbon? --Siva1979Talk to me 18:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

message: This is well-intentioned, but very confusing for casual viewers.
For an introductory picture like this, at most 4 panels should be shown to illustrate the main allotropes only:  Graphite, Diamond, C60, and a-C.  Lonsdaleite, like other stacking sequences of graphite (not shown), and higher fullerenes are too subtle variations to be thrown in like that. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.15.181.22 (talk • contribs) 05:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Who says it's introductory? It's supposed to show the staggering variety of molecular arrangements carbon appears in. That was my intention, and I think that's what it was featured for. You are invited to cut it up and rearrange it in any way, shape or form imaginable, though. It's released under the GFDL, after all. mstroeck 15:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Sorry, but I honestly have no idea what you are talking about. Can you explain again? mstroeck 19:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: It seems G. Hornyak, et al. borrowed this image for their book:
"Introduction to Nanoscience and Nanotechnology," G. Hornyak, H, Tribbals, J. Dutta, and J. Moore, CRC Press, New York (2009), pp. 248
Good work whoever made this image.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by TrueManofGenius (talk • contribs) 04:00, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Found this picture in a Graduate Nanotechnology Textbook
Talk:USS Arizona (1858)

message: En route south, she chased and overtook the cotton-laden sloop Aurelia off Mosquito Inlet, Florida, on March 23, captured her and sent her to Port Royal.
This is where an inline citation would come in handy, because it would make no sense for a cotton-laden sloop leaving the Confederacy to be captured by the Union and sent to Port Royal on the British-held island of Jamaica.
The only Port Royal mentioned on the Port Royal disambiguation page that was in the Union was Port Royal, Pennsylvania, which was rather far inland.  The others in what is now the Unites States were in the then-Confederate States of South Carolina and Virginia.
Can this be clarified? 
Respectfully, SamBlob (talk) 15:16, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Port Royal are you talking about?