Talk:Not One Less

message: What does the Chinese title mean, literally?  It seems a little long to be Not One Less.  And I've also seen the movie referred to as Together.  --GwydionM (talk) 22:05, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Chinese title literally means "Not One Less" or maybe more accurately "Not even one less." Together probably refers to the Chen Kaige film, although I haven't seen any instances where the two films were conflated.Tryptofeng (talk) 03:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: 一个都不能少 would literally be "cannot be even one less" or "can not lose even one" or something along those lines. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 21:34, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It should be "Not One Fewer". Ericoides (talk) 18:38, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Prescriptive grammar is thataway, thanks. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 15:03, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title? 

message: I have not made the usual cast list in this article, since the cast members are amateurs and most of them use their real names, so the main roles can all be found in the plot summary already. But just in case, I did put together this table (which basically parrots the film's credits). rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 23:24, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cast 

message: I know that this article is already featured, but I still want to congratulate its editors for an informative and well-written article.  Not as often seen in Chinese cinema articles, who need more helpers (thank you Tryptofeng BTW!).  Anyway, congrats. 121.7.189.76 (talk) 15:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Congratulations

message: What is the rational of putting a Traditional Chinese title over a Simplified Title of a movie made in Mainland China?
Do you put Hanja over Hangul in South Korean titles? Do you put British spellings over American spellings over Hollywood movies? Yet wikipedia keeps putting Traditional over Simplified. Traditional is almost completely irrelevant and exotic in Mainland China. So stop with this pretentious nonsense. If you MUST include it, put it belove the actual Simplified title. Check this Mainland Chinese source:
http://baike.baidu.com/link?url=_DLXe9DdVVDTNsWHoyWKYzJDUWZR7uxjWOEGfD_Nw3sbezGDYQiYM0kTT8mHgCRK7Huh2Z8U5vjbvL-cms4LXbbGqj3ktI-ay03_MUYhYXK
See the title? It's in Simplified Chinese. Like everything else. That is how they do it in China. So educate yourself and talk less with Taiwanese and diaspora and more about the billions of Chinese who are being misrepresented by having Traditional Chinese added to their art, movies and actors all over Wikipedia. It is shameful and exclusively targeting Mainland Chinese. As I said, Koreans and Americans don't get such ludicrous mistreatment here. You don't include Traditional Chinese version of names in boxes of articles about Mao Zedong or Xi Jinping... so stop with doing this elsewhere. It's disrespectful to Mainland Chinese. And misleading to people who aren't aware of which one is used in China. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.70.86.139 (talk) 22:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Traditional Chinese title over Simplified Chinese? Idiotic

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Not One Less. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081002015703/http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/review/459 to http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/review/459
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090303110011/http://www.sonypictures.com/classics/notoneless/home.html to http://www.sonypictures.com/classics/notoneless/home.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified