Talk:Law enforcement agency

message: Article now rewritten. Peet Ern (talk) 04:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no Law enforcement article; it's a redirect to police. I only noticed this article now, but after working on law enforcement articles for a while, this could be quite useful. "Police" is a pretty broad topic, and that article should reflect that, but there's a lot of material on law enforcement agencies specifically currently crowding that article that would make more sense here. If the police article ever gets done up to be adequately comprehensive, it would be huge unless it's subdivided. Just noticing from editors contributions as well, it seems to divide along these lines, i.e., some people are interested in police operations and organization (which could be covered here), while others are more interested in police issues. That said, I can't imagine that work will get done any time soon, at least til I get around to it (which might take some time), so for now, I'm indifferent to a merge, and see this merely as a placeholder for a future article. Bobanny 06:56, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge / redirect

message: Article now rewritten. Peet Ern (talk) 04:55, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: A rewrite done - hopefully it helpsPee Tern (talk) 05:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bias - US outlook only - a rewrite ? 

message: I am not sure what the difference between a rational and a fractured approach to law enforcement. Obviously, they are not opposites. the opposite of rational is irrational, and while the US law enforcement may not be as efficient or effective, the US approach is not unreasonable. The opposite of fractured could be unified, which the police in Belgium and Austria seem to be, as local and federal police are integrated. of course even though the US, Belgium, and Austria are all federations, the US is vastly different than the others, being much larger, and many more jurisdictions. The fact that you have 50 states, each state has their own judicial system and law enforcement system Rds865 (talk) 07:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The word used was rationalised, not rational, which is idiomatically quite different.  However, after the prompting, and rereading, it could be construed as possibly POV, certainly possibly not a world view wording given the potential for literal rather than idiomatic interpretation.  I have changed rationalised to relatively unified.  What do you think?  Peet Ern (talk) 08:19, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  rational vs. fractured 

message: a Law enforcement agency (LEA) is an organisation that enforces the law.
Thx, Captain Obvious  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.140.233.179 (talk) 22:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Also 

message: I think a quick read of this section tells the story on its own.  There is a clearly negative tone - making it sounds as though all the police do is take away civil liberties.  Even the title of the section draws some concern - in most states, the police are not above the law.  The law provides for peace officers to perform their duties by providing exceptions.  The current wording suggests that the police are exempt from the law.  Anyway, just some food for thought.
lesthaeghet (talk) 04:57, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clear Bias In Powers and law exemptions of a law enforcement agency 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Law enforcement agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080109095200/http://www.fbi.gov/libref/factsfigure/internal.htm to http://www.fbi.gov/libref/factsfigure/internal.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070611002342/http://www.rcmp.ca/about/organi_e.htm to http://www.rcmp.ca/about/organi_e.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081204100212/http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/commonwealth/publish.nsf/Content/publications_inspectionreports to http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/commonwealth/publish.nsf/content/publications_inspectionreports
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:18, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Law enforcement agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070802135140/http://www.ramsi.org/node/16 to http://www.ramsi.org/node/16#law
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Law enforcement agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090815093807/http://www.fbi.gov/contact/fo/fo.htm to https://www.fbi.gov/contact/fo/fo.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020806201356/http://www.secretservice.gov/protection.shtml to http://www.secretservice.gov/protection.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100127071930/http://www.afp.gov.au/act.html to http://www.afp.gov.au/act.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:30, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Law enforcement agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.interpol.int/Public/ICPO/LegalMaterials/constitution/constitutionGenReg/constitution.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060512182026/http://www.eupm.org/Documents/Weekly.pdf to http://www.eupm.org/Documents/Weekly.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.ag.gov.au/www/agd/agd.nsf/Page/TerritoriesofAustralia_Cocos(Keeling)Islands_CocosIslandsGovernanceandAdministration
*Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20090519180135/http://www.afp.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/61384/ControlledOps07Senate.pdf to http://www.afp.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/61384/ControlledOps07Senate.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:02, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified