Talk:106 & Park

message: Is the 'Freestyle Friday 2001-2007" section that was added even written in english? 207.144.168.175 05:37, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  My goodness 

message: :Image:106parklogoold.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:12, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:106parklogoold.gif

message: :Image:106parkphoneinterview.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 04:13, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:106parkphoneinterview.jpg

message: I deleted the special editions section because it is difficult to keep up with all of the special editions of 106 & Park. In addition, you would also have to keep up with all of the past special editions of the series. Therefore, it was deleted
Hog2 (talk) 11:02, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion of Special Editions Section

message: should all the dates for when videos chart and premeire for 07 be deleted?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.132.148.119 (talk) 04:59, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dates 

message: Should the article include an exhaustive list—dating from Aug 2007 to the present—of every single "New Jam of the Day" (20+ per month) and "New Entry"? —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 09:27, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It absolutely should not.  Not only is it unsourced but it clearly violates WP:NOT#IINFO.  I've removed it. - eo (talk) 00:10, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Uhhh, ok so now New Joints & New Entries from 106 & Park has been created and everything is moved there.  Not exactly what the goal was. - eo (talk) 01:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC

message: All of this information has been removed per WP:NOT#IINFO and under the basis that it is not notable and its "source" is a blog (not a reliable source).  Further, upon being moved to its own article, it was deleted per consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Joints & New Entries from 106 & Park.  Therefore, it should not be continuously readded here.  To editors: please stop placing it here.  It also does not belong on User Pages or User Talk Pages per WP:User page.  Again, please stop re-inserting non-notable info here; continuing to do so at this point will be considered vandalism. - eo (talk) 17:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Joints & New Entries from 106 & Park

message: I know it takes a lot of work to keep the top 10 countdown updated, with the new joints and all but please let it be put back on the page. it was a huge help for me to keep me informed on the latest songs and the albums that i must have. it takes work but i'll update everyday if i have to as long as you allow me to put it back up! get back with me as soon as possible please, what can I do to make a difference or change your minds?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kelltaylor777777 (talk • contribs) 07:33, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We can't because they won't let us. :(
--Piazzajordan2 (straight chillin) 07:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I KNOW IT TAKES ALOT BUT PLEASE????? 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.bet.com/OnTV/BETShows/106andpark/106andpark_about_article
** In 106 & Park on 2011-05-23 02:02:10, 404 Not Found
** In 106 & Park on 2011-05-31 22:03:08, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 22:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 

message: During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
* http://www.106andpark.com
** In 106 & Park on 2011-05-23 02:02:16, HTTP Redirect Loop:  ->  ->  ->  -> 
** In 106 & Park on 2011-05-31 22:03:10, HTTP Redirect Loop:  ->  ->  ->  -> 
--JeffGBot (talk) 22:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dead link 2