Talk:Non-heterosexual

message: It's gender-studies cruft. How can an article about this term be much more than a bare-bones stub? Feel free to prove me wrong...--h i s   s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 14:56, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  I would consider this for deletion 

message: Maybe I'm just hanging out in the wrong places, but that's an odd template.  Every article listed for deletion is an article that needs ""ing and to have a second huge template on the article page is highly undesirable. - brenneman 04:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The rescue tag is for articles at AfD, which, by its nature is in place for only a few days and is seen as just as unwelcome as the AfD template by some editors. Disagree that "all" articles need rescuing - this tag is only for articles which an editor has tagged as probably being notable. In practice out of teh hundreds of articles in AfD this tag usually is only on 10-15 at a time. Banjeboi 18:41, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wierd template 

message: from AfD - "Non-homosexual" is a bit more borderline as is "non-bisexual" although both might be valid subheadings here. Of all the terms Non-heterosexual seems to have the most usage, I stopped at 30-40 books but there were dozens more that also addressed this material. Non-homosexual and non-bisexual both had mentions but they were definitely used far less although in similar contexts of explaning one group verses all others outside the group. Banjeboi 22:04, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Non-homosexual and non-bisexual sections? 

message: There's about 50-80 more to work through as possible sources. Banjeboi 23:00, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible sources 

message: Very sharply-written article.  It will have to be carefully watched so it doesn't accumulate OP and POV.  - House of Scandal (talk) 04:34, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, do you mean OR? Banjeboi 06:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sharp

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Non-heterosexual. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081014103045/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3752/is_200505/ai_n13640713 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3752/is_200505/ai_n13640713
*Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:3WTT3VDa_IQJ:eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/757/2/Queering_Religious_Texts.pdf+%22non-heterosexual%22+term+-%22long-term%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=9&gl=us with https://web.archive.org/web/20140513223006/http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/757/2/Queering_Religious_Texts.pdf on http://eprints.nottingham.ac.uk/757/2/Queering_Religious_Texts.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081014154033/http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2372/is_2_41/ai_n6112879/pg_2 to http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2372/is_2_41/ai_n6112879/pg_2
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: This article lacks an encyclopedic tone, with too much reliance on unconfirmed and unfalsifiable gender studies axioms. In essence, the article needs to edited for objectivity. 2A02:14F:170:4164:0:0:5677:9D75 (talk) 04:12, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article, while valid for subject, is characterized by a distinct bias