Talk:Media psychology

message: Initial definitions are taken from the Media Psychology Research Center (a site maintained by leading researchers in the area(s) of media psychology), and the American Psychological Assocation's  Division 46 - Media Psychology
----
We encourage the participation interested and qualified individuals in the development of a constructive definition of the of the field. --Timothy Wells 12:20, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Definitions

message: I am interested in helping edit this page. For course credit, I am doing research in various journal articles in regards to this topic. Mostly, I want to elaborate on the definition, add new sections (theoretical perspectives, methodology, and key findings), and correct citations. Please, feel free to add suggestions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamela Peterson (talk • contribs) 03:14, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Contributing to Page for Psychology Class

message: I feel that "Torches of Freedom" ought to be not only linked to but featured as a simple-to-understand example that is suitable for, say, high-school students. If anyone would be willing to help, I would like to add a section that does include such an example. So, formally, this would mean:
:This article shall include the following: (1) an overview, lacking minor details, suitable for a high-school Sophmore, Junior, and/or Senior, or any combination thereof, of one single and complete example of the historical exploitation of media psychology
Anyway, that is the idea, of course that phrase could be appended or modified in any way, but I hope the intent and basic concept is clear. I'll update the article now. 173.239.78.54 (talk) 00:13, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article fails to mention "Torches of Freedom" 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.apa.org/divisions/div46/amp041.html,  http://memforms.apa.org/apa/cli/interest/ethics1.cfm#5_01, and probably elswhere also. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:40, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Can someone update the photo? The photo represents social media from 7 years ago. With the introduction of instragram and snapchat stories along with Snapmap, things have definitely changed.AI coolTIM (talk) 19:08, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Update Photo

message: "Media psychology is the branch and specialty field in psychology that focuses on the interaction human behavior and media and technology." Is this missing an "of" somewhere? --1000Faces (talk) 03:17, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  First sentence doesn't read properly