lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Agnes of Aquitaine, wife of Ramiro II of Aragon

message: http://fmg.ac/Projects/MedLands/ARAGON%20&%20CATALONIA.htm#_ftn261
"Primary sources assign two different parentages to the widow of Vicomte Aimery [VI] who married King Ramiro.  The first possible origin is suggested by the Chronicle of Saint-Maxence, which records that "Willelmo comiti…" (indicating Guillaume VII Comte de Poitou) & his wife had five daughters, one of whom married "vicecomiti Toarcensi"[257].  Although this source does not name the Vicomte de Thouars in question, it suggests that the wife of Aimery [VI] was AGNES de Poitou, daughter of GUILLAUME IX Duke of Aquitaine [GUILLAUME VII Comte de Poitou] & his second wife Philippa de Toulouse."
Cites are: 
 "Chronica Adefonsi imperatoris I, 62, p. 190.; 
However, 
"The second possible origin is provided by a fragmentary chronicle of the dukes of Aquitaine which specifically records the marriage of "Aimericus de Theofagiis vicecomes…de Thoarcio" and "Mahaudam [Agnes dicta] ex prosapia sua [=Willelmus Pictaviensis comes]…filia Willelmi de Podio-Fagi qui Franciæ camerarius erat in vita Regis Philippi"
And again:
ES II 58, ES II 76, and ES III 810, which refers to her as the illegitimate daughter of the Duke of Aquitaine. Three different sources, three different origins.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.48.250.140 (talk) 11:49, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with the sourcing
Talk:Shin Kong Life Tower

message: This page should not be deleted because it provides only basic information about this skyscraper and does not, in any way, advertise for a company, product, group, service or person. I have added this information for people who just want to learn more about this tower, that happens to be in my city, Taipei, Taiwan.
--Tiiger 011 12:55, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Harry Fraser (director)

message: The redirect Wayne Carter has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  ErceÇamurOfficial (talk) 14:02, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Wayne Carter]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Montpelier Hill

message: "In 1971, the skeleton of a dwarfish figure was found buried ..." - What does this mean? If "the skeleton of a short person", then why not say so? -- 201.19.11.75 13:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A dwarfish figure?? 

message: The photograph is a silhouette, with the light coming from the far side, so that it's hard to see details; only the shape is clearly visible without looking closely.  Can a photograph taken under better illumination conditions be added? 128.101.250.1 18:35, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  photograph 

message: There is very little factual information here on the Hell-Fire Club themselves, even if current scholarship argues that that was a generic name for types of clubs, it might be an idea to either include more information here, on the British Hell-Fire Club page or create a new page for the Irish clubs. Also why are no primary sources listed for the Club?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.255.180.127 (talk) 17:42, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Factual Information

message: The article introduction refers to "the Afizi House" without any indication of what it is. Any thoughts about adding some clarification? jxm (talk) 22:06, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: That would be vandalism. It should be the Steward's House. Reverted now. - Joe King (talk) 08:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afizi House?
Talk:Dongshan County

message: There is a dongshan county in Zhangzhou prefecture level city. The redirection has to be changed to a ambigious page.
--Takamaxa 13:02, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

message: Isn't "Tonghshan" a misspelling? 98.123.38.211 (talk) 06:38, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misspelling
Talk:Sieg (river)

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to Sieg River. Unanimous agreement that a move is A Good Thing; NATDAB argument is stronger policy-wise. (closed by non-admin page mover) HouseBlastertalk 00:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support per nominator.  Killuminator (talk) 11:29, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 September 2023
Talk:Sõrve säär

message: Ideas? --Alexia Death the Grey 05:29, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe the lighthouse part can be in peninsula article? Avjoska (talk) 11:16, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Sõrve säär redirects to Sõrve Peninsula. Sõrve Lighthouse is individual article--Estopedist1 (talk) 12:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge we must, but what in what?
Talk:Roger de Busli

message: The whole second paragraph is VERY dubious. How would a Norman marry another Norman in Tichill c1060, i.e. 6 years before the Norman Conquest? The genealogy website links are also dubious. For Sieur De Busli, it states that spouses and children are unknown, so how can it also say that Roger de Busli is his son? Some more reliable sources needed here. Emeraude 13:31, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are exactly right. The genealogy websites are notoriously unreliable. Although much about Roger de Busli is unknown, he was one of the major tenants of William I, and there is a great deal of documentation about him. I will try to flesh this out when I get a chance. Thanks for pointing it out.MarmadukePercy (talk) 18:27, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Seine-Inferieure is the old name of Seine-Maritime.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 19:01, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The derivation of the name of Roger de Busli is given by Lewis Loyd in his definitive The Origins of Some Anglo-Norman Families as Bully, Seine-Maritime.. This village is located some six miles due west of Neufchâtel-en-Bray, Seine-Maritime. It is known simply as Bully, and not Bully-le-Vicomte.. Regards,MarmadukePercy (talk) 06:48, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bully, Seine-Maritime 

message: It is known that the co-founder of Roche Abbey in South Yorkshire was Richard de Busli, whose partner in the raising of the Abbey was Richard Fitz-Turgis (or FitzTurgis), later 'de Wickersley.' I believe that the de Busli who co-founded Roche was probably the great-nephew of Roger de Busli, as almost all accounts state that the great Norman baron had only one child who died young. Does anyone have any thoughts about the co-founder of Roche? I suspect it's the grandson of Roger de Busli's brother, but I have seen no definitive sources on this; it's mostly a matter of putting the pieces together. Thanks and regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 06:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to one site (the Rotherham municipal website) Richard de Busli was the grandson of Arnaldus de Busli, brother of the Norman baron Roger de Busli..MarmadukePercy (talk) 08:05, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Roche Abbey
Talk:Jolene Anderson

message: How tall is Jolene Anderson? Anyone? WikiphyteMk1 13:32, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Height 
Talk:Lorenzo the Elder

message: I see someone has added a Lenora di Medici as part of the issue of Lorenzo.  Does anyone have any information on this, or was it just someone's foolhardy edit?
Cake (talk) 06:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed it, it was not indicated in the source I was looking at. 1bandsaw (talk) 05:58, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Lenora
Talk:Lustron house

message: There is already a separate article titled "List of Lustron houses." It does a much better job of doing what the "Current status" section is attempting to do.  It's far more organized and far more complete. It's listed alphabetically by state, with street addresses for almost every house. It even has links for separate articles about individual houses.  The "Current status" section of this article, though, is pretty much a train wreck.  It's a disorganized, incomplete list which is trying to pass as a coherent paragraph of text, and every person that chimes in with a mention of the houses that they personally know about in the towns they live in just contributes to the sense that it's a collection of individual unrelated sentences thrown together randomly.  I tried to clean it up a bit, but after looking at it afterwards I really think it's better just to get rid of it.
I think just deleting an entire section without any consensus is a big step, though, so if anyone has any comments or opinions counter to what I mentioned here, please speak out.  I will leave this up for at least a few weeks.  If nobody has any objections by that time, I'm going to take the section out. Ormewood (talk) 19:06, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Reworded to only include a notable example. More could be added. Full list is linked. ɱ (talk) 23:07, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current status section...is it necessary? 

message: The official name of these structures is "Lustron Home," not Lustron house.  I can provide TONS of literature that confirms this.  Is there any way to change this (and direct "Lustron house" enquiries to "Lustron Home")? 73.255.216.196 (talk) 13:21, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lustron house" vs. "Lustron Home"
Talk:Mom's Apple Pie

message: Where is the image? The cover is directly commented in the article, so it would be ok on Wikipedia under fair use. --Ticram (talk) 13:05, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have an image of the cover, but it is much too much trouble to jump through Wikipedia's hoops, so I'll email it anyone who wants to post it. Nicmart (talk) 11:24, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cover art
Talk:American Freedom Campaign

message: I'm wondering where Steve Fox is in this article. 
Shouldn't he be included here as well?
He also should have a page.
222.2.98.43 (talk) 05:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Steve Fox

message: Did he sign it? Anxietycello (talk) 22:28, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obama
Talk:Outer automorphism group

message: Tha table says that Out(Z) = Z_2, but all the definitions lead to Out(Z) = Z. In fact, Inn(Z) = 0, since Z is abelian. Which is the reference used for the table? Espigaymostaza (talk) 14:40, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Aut(Z) = Units(Z) = {+1,-1} is cyclic of order two.  Hence Out(Z) = Aut(Z)/Inn(Z) =~ Aut(Z) is cyclic of order two.  The table is likely pulled from several references.  The cleanup tag "fact" has been added to indicate someone should go and record which references. JackSchmidt (talk) 15:03, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Integers

message: The page says that because we have a quotient space, which is not necessarily a subgroup (correct) that the outer automorphisms are not automorphisms. That seems contradictory to the definition which is that any automorphism which is not inner is outer. I think this is just a mistake, but I'm not an expert, so could someone who knows please edit it?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.1.205.201 (talk) 15:19, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: According to chapter 7 of the book An introduction to the theory of groups by Rotman, an outer automorphism is an automorphism that is not inner. So the elements of Out(G) should not be called outer automorphisms. --Stomatapoll (talk) 19:36, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outer Automorphisms are not themselves automorphisms? 

message: Seen on twitter today. Seems it should be noted here. Seems remarkable. Seems to be constructive, too: "How hard is it to find the simple group whose outer automorphism group is Z/n, or Sₙ? Easy... Let m > 2. Then PSp(2m,2^n) has outer automorphism group cyclic of order n. ...the automorphism is induced by the Frobenius automorphism x -> x^2 on GF(2^n)."   Unclear to me if its always constructive... 84.15.181.197 (talk) 07:21, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  [Droste–Giraudet–Göbel 2001]: Every group is the outer automorphism group of a simple group.
Category talk:Former Protestants

message: I will remove people from this category for whom their previous association with Protestantism is not a defining characteristic. See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_July_23#People_by_former_religion.
Andries 13:53, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening heading

message: As the Roman Catholic Church, at official levels, no longer refers to Anglicans as being 'Protestants' (and generally makes a distinction between the Anglican tradition and Protestant traditions) editors - especially Roman Catholic ones - should also respect this distinction and not include Anglicans amongst lists of Protestants. Anglicanus (talk) 07:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Anglicans
Talk:Deerfield station

message: Can we get a picture of the building itself? Einbierbitte (talk) 18:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There's one here. ----DanTD (talk) 15:26, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: UPDATE - User:Teemu08 finally added one. ----DanTD 04:05, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Colonnades, Croydon

message: Soon a picture will come to this page as well as others, because i'm going to go "crazy" with my digital camera next week! So if you see anyone around Croydon with a camera it's probably me! Pafcool2 15:33, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved to The Colonnades, Croydon. The discussion appears to have converged on the opinion that "The Colonnades" is the WP:COMMONNAME for this location; however, that COMMONNAME does need disambiguation, and the comma-separated location was found to be preferable for achieving that goal. (closed by non-admin page mover)  ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 17:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Colonnades Leisure Park →  – This place is more widely known as "Croydon Colonnades" or "The Colonnades", but "The Colonnades" would require disambiguation and is hence less attractive an option. For example, see Google Trends in the UK (where most traffic would occur). There is much more searching for "Croydon Colonnades" than "Colonnades Leisure Park". —Matrix(!) (a good person!)[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much] 11:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject London has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 15:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 February 2024
Talk:Papillon Rose

message: DVD complete Mania.com --KrebMarkt 06:58, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, I added it to the article. Aldebaran66 (talk) 22:32, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: I have removed the maintenance tags after adding more material on the releases with references and correcting much of the existing material. I also upgraded the class of the article to "Start". Please let me know specifically if anything needs to be done. Note that much of the History section was WP:OR, stale or otherwise irrelevant, so I removed most of it. Aldebaran66 (talk) 02:12, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup
Talk:Erwin Meister

message: Merge this with Bollier into MEBO - nothing is said about the individuals, only the company.--Konalgia911 14:25, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: More silliness by Konalgia911!Phase4 21:37, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ranting by Konalgia911
Talk:Area codes 506 and 428

message: I just removed the following unsourced paragraph:
:Recently the 506 area code has become synonymous with scammers trying to steal credit card numbers.  The scammers pose as a company whom someone has a credit card with (without saying which company).  The scammers then ask for your credit card number (hoping that you only have one card and that they won't raise any suspicions).  Research suggests that the entity (or entities) that are doing this scam often change their phone number to another number in the 506 area code as there have been over one hundred different phone numbers from the 506 area code complained about as a source of this scam.  It is also possible to fake an area code, but given the number of different 506 area code phone numbers that have engaged in this scam in the past, it is most likely that the scammers are centered in New Brunswick.  If you do not know someone in New Brunswick, then it is probably smartest to not pick up any calls from the 506 area code.
The numbers beginning with 506 that I see are clearly forged: eleven digits (50622175325, for instance).  Some have Caller ID information of "Cell Phone   NB", but I think that's added along the way based solely on the provided number.  See this Web site for more information; they believe these crims are based in Florida.—Dah31 (talk) 23:44, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alleged credit card fraud 
Talk:Neak Loeung

message: I've been trying unsuccessfully to find the Prek Ksay pagoda in Neak Leoung (for another Wikpedia article). The pagoda is mentioned in the Phnom Penh Post article below in the context of a Leonard Cohen donation. 
Any info gratefully received !
https://www.phnompenhpost.com/sport/leonard-cohen-gives-generously-pagoda
Dentbottle (talk) 03:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pagoda
Talk:List of parishes in New Brunswick

message: What Mrwalis may mean to say by "the parish concept is completely defunct" is that the APPLICATION of the concept, where parish wards feed a regional i.e. county municipality, was made defunct by the abolishment of county councils during the louis robichaud equal opportunity suite of legislative changes. More specifically it was the Ed Byrne commission report that undertook to revamp local government and taxation.
One may argue that having kept the parish boundaries largely preserved the parishes and counties frozen in time to this day despite the intent to abolish the system all together.Placeographer77 (talk) 16:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contribs by user Mrwalis 

message: Alot about the origins of the civil parish in NB can be learned from reading the entry at Civil parishes of England, since Dominion of Canada developments would parallel those in the mother country.
I would like to see accurate pictures of the NB local government story to inform ourconversations. Placeographer77 (talk) 14:10, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements from a more complete understanding of what were parishes
Talk:List of neighbourhoods in New Brunswick

message: Are we sure Pamdenec joined GB in 1988? I think it was well before that...?
Shopteacher (talk) 21:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right. the Village of Pamdenec was the first village incorporated in the Grand Bay area. Pamdenec grew to become the Village of GB in 1973, then became a town in 1988.  DarkLanternBrigadier (talk) 11:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pamdenec
Talk:Konstanz (district)

message: A documentary reference to one Chaim-Herman-Heymann Chone, who served as a Jewish chaplain in the Imperial German Army and was decorated with the Iron Cross, places him in or about 1910 as "Chief Rabbi of the Konstanz am Bodensee district" [sic]. Was the district of Konstanz, or similar administrative division, ever known by that or a similar name?[-- Thanks, Deborahjay (talk) 12:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ever known as "Konstanz am Bodensee"?
Talk:Karlsruhe (district)

message: Actually, there are two districts Karlsruhe. The one described in the article is called the Rural District Karlsruhe (Landkreis Karlsruhe). It partially encloses the other one, which is called the Urban District Karlsruhe (Stadtkreis Karlsruhe), which contains the City of Karlsruhe. CuriousOliver (talk) 17:57, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two Districts Karlsruhe 
Talk:Anonymous

message: I want to update it in today's day and age this article is outdated Reallytrustfulperson (talk) 19:06, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. TJRC (talk) 19:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 November 2023
Talk:GetDeb

message: I created this article, and I wanted to make it simple short and easy understandable. 
I'm not a very experienced Wikipedia user, so, please if someone can help me to improve it I will appreciate.
This article is not an advertisement.
We where discussing in ubuntu forums, (here) about this article. We just want to create an article to explain what this Software portal is. Specially now that is used for that many Ubuntu Users.
If you have objections, please post it here in the discussion before modify the article.
Cheers.
The article looks like an advertisement and mostly describes the nature of the deb packages, their usage and benefits rather than the site itself. Much of this information should be moved to deb (file format) and this article fixed to describe better the website itself Pictureuploader (talk) 08:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

message: The server is down.
Note: GetDeb is no longer discontinued and sites and repos are not up and working. Not sure who got them up yet. Linux wiki edditors must still be high on there trust fund drugs from the hollidays to not notice the return of Playdeb or to lazy masterbaiting to NPC's on twitter. Updated article on January 2019 5th, 11:08, Planet Earth of the Human Empire.
--2003:DD:6F24:8D00:4B4:76DF:78EF:D5FE (talk) 17:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discontinued 

message: Is this still correct?
> GetDeb and PlayDeb services can also be used by Ubuntu derivatives starting with 16.04 as the 14.04 packages were removed once when Ubuntu 14.04 reached EOL.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.12.75.30 (talk) 06:28, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening paragraph doubt
Talk:Nerima Station

message: There is an error in the edit summary for this edit . The summary should read: "Added hyphen in Toei station numbering to make it consistent with other Toei station articles." Sorry for the inconvenience, JTST4RS (talk) 13:53, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistake in edit summary 
Template talk:Ja-rail-line

message: Try as I might, I cannot seem to get the lines to look right on the page. Look at the mess I made of Nerima Station. I imagine this has to do with the "first" parameter, as I really don't understand what it is for, how to use it, or how it works. Am I the only one having trouble with this? With sufficient explanation, I hope to be able to not have such troubles in the future. Thank you. LordAmeth 15:17, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Messed up Formatting
Template talk:Xiamen

message: This template has a whole lot of red links.  For many of them, I've either created articles or am planning to create articles. What I want to ask, though, is: are we including structures and points of interest not built yet, such as Haicang Tunnel or Xiang'an Bridge?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woshiyiweizhongguoren (talk • contribs) 16:16, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  About this template