lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Tomb (novel)

message: Repairman Jack novels, including "The Tomb" are not easily pigeon-holed into genres like Horror, as it is currently denoted. They include elements of horror, supernatural, mystery, thriller, and even sci-fi, and probably more. The bookstores I've visited simply keep F. Paul Wilson's Repairman Jack novels in the "Fiction" section. I would like to suggest removing the Horror genre specification. Thoughts?
Dejo.eh 04:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Genre is not exclusionary, thus does not "pigeon-hole" a novel. A novel may be at one and the same time historical fiction, romance, and (as you say) "horror, supernatural, mystery, thriller, and even sci-fi, and probably more." (E.g. The Stress of Her Regard, by Tim Powers, might qualify.) Isaac Asimov wrote sci-fi mysteries (The Caves of Steel, etc.), Randall Garrett wrote fantasy mysteries involving Lord Darcy (Too Many Magicians, etc.), and those works are prized for crossing genres, yet are generally shelved in just the first-mentioned ones... and no-one suggests that the solution is to remove their "sci-fi" or "fantasy" genre specification! If possible, cataloguers and shelvers have to decide somehow where to put a novel, lest all novels wind up in the undifferentiated "Fiction" section so that readers have a much longer job of slogging through everything; shelving under a main genre category has been found the most convenient arrangement, for readers as well as shelvers. – •Raven  .talk 01:43, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre of This Novel

message: A summary of the changes made in the rereleased version would be helpful. 212.159.69.4 (talk) 21:20, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rerelease changes
Talk:Nakhon Phanom Royal Thai Navy Base

message: This would be a higher class if it was cited WP:CITE.
Buckshot06 03:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: Task Force Alpha (PACAF) has a link to a British Military Unit.
I was in the 6908, a unit with an operation area within TFA. There is no Wiki info on this unit, but I was in it 1971-1972. The 6908th was part of what was then known as USAF Security Service, and it in turn was affiliated with 6990th Okinawa,  6994th, and several units in South Vietnam (Cam Ranh Bay, Da Nang, Saigon).
An operational neighbor included in TFA was Igloo White, referenced as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Igloo_White
I would suggest modifying the TFA link and point it to Igloo White instead. I am new to this so I would rather be in contact with other authors first.
Dr. Mike Olson (talk) 03:50, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello , welcome to Wikipedia!  For now I modified the links so that they stop pointing to the wrong Task Force Alpha.  I guess the main question regarding pointing the links to Igloo White would be: did Task Force Alpha participate in other operations besides Igloo White?  It doesn't seem like they did; if that's the case then I think linking to Igloo White would be a good idea. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 03:59, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect Link
Talk:The Three Hostages

message: I'm planning to have a go at simplifying the plot section and reducing its length. Although well written, at 2000 words the section is nearly three times as long as it should be, and very much reproduces rather than summarises the plot, contrary to WP:NOVELPLOT. MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:10, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. MichaelMaggs (talk) 22:32, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot length
Talk:Þorsteinn Gylfason

message: Why remove the picture if it falls under fair use? --D. Webb 21:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really think it does - Template:Promotional should only be used under very particular conditions which haven't been demonstrated here. Haukur 21:36, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture
Talk:Tuy Hoa Air Base

message: There is no discussion of the 314th Airlift wing's use of Tuy Hoa, or of the 1968 attack on the base.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Furbucket2016 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: If you have reliable sources for these events feel free to add them in. Mztourist (talk) 12:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  History Missing 

message: What did the South Vietnamese government do with the base between 1970 and 1975?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.81.200.114 (talk) 19:01, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: 1970-5 usage
Talk:Tom Cheek

message: Hello,
The second to last paragraph in the article originally read:
In 2005, Cheek was nominated for the Ford C. Frick Award from the Baseball Hall of Fame, along with long-time broadcast partner Jerry Howarth.
The paragraph now reads:
In 2005, 2006, and 2007, Cheek was named among the ten finalists for the Ford C. Frick Award by the Baseball Hall of Fame.  The award is presented each year, during the Hall of Fame's induction ceremonies, to a broadcaster for "major contributions to baseball."
The following changes were made:
1.  Text added to indicate that Tom Cheek was named one of ten finalists for the Ford C. Frick award for each of the years 2005-7.  Describing him as a finalist distinguishes him from the nearly 200 broadcasters who were eligible for the award, and therefore, were on the preliminary ballot that was voted on by the general public and considered by the Hall of Fame's research committee.  Also added was the purpose of the Ford C. Frick award. (Please note that, on their website - http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/news/2006/061205.htm - the ten finalists for the award are not referred to as "nominees", but as "finalists".)
2.  Removed Jerry Howarth's "nomination" for the Ford C. Frick Award.  While he is eligible for the award, he was not named a finalist as defined above.
3.  Included internal links to Wikipedia pages describing the ten finalists for each of the years 2005-7.  This information supports the statements referenced in points 1 and 2 above.
4.  Included external link from CBC News, which describes that Cheek has been named a finalist for the third consecutive year.
JWTodd 12:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to Tom Cheek page
Talk:2006 Atlantic hurricane season/Florence

message: Here's another one. bob rulz 20:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well this is certainly something.  3 invests in 26 hours, and some disturbed weather east of FL (though that looks to be like an upper-low, but we'll see).  Dare I say, the season is finally waking up? -Runningonbrains 00:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think this blob will do much though. Dry air will get to it. CrazyC83 03:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Dvorak estimates now T1.5/1.5! -- WmE 13:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NHC is now calling for the possibility of a tropical depression later today out of this one. Jake52 My talk 14:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

text: We could have TWO new depressions before the Labor Day weekend is through! Perhaps Florence and Gordon soon! 98L just adds fuel to the fire to 90L... CrazyC83 15:29, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 90L.INVEST

message: Just appeared!!! -- WmE 18:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: (pokes the sizzling atlantic) Wow this is amazing. Hello32020 18:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You know September is here when these blobs develop this fast. I think it will quickly become Florence. CrazyC83 18:48, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here comes the hurricane!... --§ Alastor "Mad-Eye" Moody (talk + contribs + userboxes) 19:04, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless shear picks up or she decides to take the same path as Ernesto... CrazyC83 19:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

text: The one that became Debby looked quite good.  It looks like T.D. #6 should become Florence pretty easily.  After that, who knows.  The key is the central Atlantic trough. Thegreatdr 20:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 06L.NONAME
Talk:Nottingham Goose Fair

message: According to the Nottingham Journal 5 August 1943 the fair was held that year but in August. --palmiped |  Talk   15:04, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, it seems you're right, a daylight-only Goose Fair was held at least twice during WW2. I'll look into it further. Rodney Baggins (talk) 16:15, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you have access to the Nottingham Journal? There's evidence the 1943 one was held in July not August. Rodney Baggins (talk) 09:16, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  I no longer have a subscription to the British Newspaper Archive but it is possible to search, 1943 Goose Fair opened on 31 July 1943 Search results see 2nd and 11th result fair closed for four years 1939 to 1942 inc.--palmiped |  Talk   11:08, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: WW2

message: The short story "Goose Fair" by D.H. Lawrence was published in THE ENGLISH REVIEW in February 1910 67.70.57.57 (talk) 18:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes I think you might be right. It's selling on ebay.   And, to be fair, I can't find any actual evidence that it was "first published in 1914". Rodney Baggins (talk) 10:03, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it in The Prussian Officer and Other Stories so I will alter accordingly. Thanks for the info! Rodney Baggins (talk) 10:16, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Date Correction
Talk:Thomas Willmore

message: The last sentence of the article is as follows:
"A sculpture by Peter Sales was unveiled at the university 13 March 2012. It is entitled "Willmore Surface" and depicts a 4-lobed Willmore torus."
This is indeed a nice-looking sculpture.
But it is not clear what connection it has to Willmore surfaces, or what connection it has to any kind of "torus".
It appears to be two linked tori. The core circles of the two tori appear to have linking number equal to 2.
(I am not suggesting that this picture be removed from the article.)
But I hope that someone knowledgeable about the sculpture and mathematics can describe the sculpture accurately. 2601:200:C000:1A0:3014:AB85:A6F4:70EF (talk) 21:00, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this correct?
Talk:Embankment tube station

message: This article appears to contradict itself; in the "History" section the original name is stated as Charing Cross, but the "In Popular Culture" section claims that Embankment was the original name of this station, and that this was "reinstated" in 1976.
These can't both be true, so which is it? — 94.197.229.40 (talk) 22:11, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They are both correct, although the "In Popular Culture" section is poorly worded. It all depends on which bit of the station you are talking about. The oldest part of the station, opened by the Metropolitan District Railway in 1870 and now the Circle and District line platforms, was called "Charing Cross". The Bakerloo line platforms opened in 1906 and they were originally called "Embankment". When the Northern line platforms opened in 1914, both it and the Bakerloo line platforms were called "Charing Cross (Embankment)" although the Circle line platforms kept their original name. It was not until 1974 that the tube and sub-surface parts of the station officially had the same name which was, for a time, "Charing Cross Embankment" before the current name was introduced in 1976. A detailed explanation of the various names the station has had is available from the first of the external links on the article page. --DavidCane (talk) 21:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction? 

message: If someone can find a more reliable source, then this story would be a great addition to the article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oswald Laurence 

message: The redirect Embankemnt tube station has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Trainsandotherthings (talk) 15:27, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Embankemnt tube station]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Breakfast at Tiffany's

message: I created this page because the main article on Breakfast at Tiffany's needed to be disambiguated.
I chose to leave the main article to be about the movie, because in contemporary culture it is clearly the most widely used and most well known usage for the term--this is attested by (1) a google search (2) that the movie has clearly overtaken the novella in popularity and in the consciousness of the public (3) Audrey Hepburn's portrayal of Holly Golightly has become an iconic role in both cinema history and popular culture. Phrases from the movie entered into general usage as early as the sixties.
For the page about the play, I cut and pasted the section about it from the movie page.
I did the same for the page about the novella.
Someone had already created a page for the song. --Sp3lly 15:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tonino Delli Colli

message: Why was his picture a picture of Calvin Coolidge?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.218.93.138 (talk) 17:22, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Italian WP has 1923.  I wonder why.  --  Jack of Oz [Talk] 08:05, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth
Talk:Ubon Royal Thai Air Force Base

message: If am wanting to get in touch with any and all who served with me. I am George Barnett and I am 76 yrs old. I was a jet engine mechanic with the F-4. Please reach out to me.
george98barnett@aol.com
George98barnett (talk) 00:51, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  8th Tactical Fighter Wing 1964-1968 Ubon RTAFB, Thailand
Talk:Leaves Turn Inside You

message: As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this article taking a look back at Unwound's Leaves Turn Inside You. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the article and—if he or she sees fit—post it as an external link on this page. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! Mike harkin (talk) 22:15, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  External link suggestion: Feature article about ''Leaves Turn Inside You''
Talk:Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982

message: the crown copyright text is under an unacceptable licence and we need to get rid of it.  Morwen - Talk 15:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

message: There should be a more consise version of this NewAppreciatePain (talk) 13:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consiseness
Talk:Tunney Hunsaker

message: i would oppose deletion of this WP article. An entire chapter is devoted to Tunney Hunsaker (including an interview of Hunsaker) and the Hunsaker-Ali boxing bout in the book Facing Ali and Hunsaker is remembered for being the very first opponent of Muhammad Ali in Ali's professional boxing career. The Hunsaker-Ali fight is covered in numerous books and articles. The book Muhammad Ali: His Life and Times features an interview of Hunsaker and a description of the Hunsaker-Ali fight.Soham321 (talk) 13:02, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A clarification: the chapter on Hunsaker in Facing Ali is not confined to the Ali-Hunsaker fight. Rather it includes a biographical profile of Hunsaker. Soham321 (talk) 15:11, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose Deletion
Talk:Salvador Camarata

message: I'm a pretty good story teller; fair to middling researcher (particularly in obscure and niche fields); but I'm certainly not a "writer" - not by the standards of Wiki.  So I'm hoping someone with the needed skills and a good working knowledge of things "wiki" will step up and whip this page into shape.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Comcents (talk • contribs) 16:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tyrone Davis

message: Davis' birth date was changed in this unexplained edit in 2016, from the date of October 3, 1937, given in the cited source ("BARE", by Eagle and LeBlanc), to the alternative date of May 4, 1938.   "BARE" gives two possible names - Tyrone D. Branch and Tyrone D. Fettson - and states in a footnote "Some sources give May 4, 1938, but the 1937 date is based on information from his funeral program", adding: "His parents have also been reported as John and Falker Davis."    In a post on Facebook, the co-author Bob Eagle has commented: "I can see neither name [Branch or Fettson] in the 1940 census for Washington County, MS. I don't know how to resolve this."   Comments here are welcome, but simply changing the date without providing a reliable source is unacceptable.   Ghmyrtle (talk) 06:58, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth details
Talk:Vardan Kushnir

message: Good riddance.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.181.201.82 (talk) 13:56, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hey, that girl said, it was self-defense. And even if not - if someone killed him who received spam, it could as well have been just manslaughter (I don't know russian laws, but in Europe it differs much from the US ones). Maybe change the heading to death. --Constructor 02:27, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Murder?
Talk:Vassar Clements

message: "Featuring guest appearances by the Charlie Daniels Band, whom pays much of their success to Vassar."
[sic!]
In English, please.
David M. Hennessey (talk) 01:48, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Poor Grammar

message: The article states that "the Scruggs-Clements duet achieved some recognition playing the theme to the television sitcom The Beverly Hillbillies". 
I think the author might have meant the "Flatt and Scruggs" duo; Flatt and Scruggs had a popular bluegrass band at that time, but I can find no evidence that Vassar Clements played fiddle on that number. I know that, in the Flatt and Scruggs at Carnegie Hall album, he was not their fiddle player (though I wish he had been).
rc (talk) 12:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I see a few search results for the two. The entry doesn't mean he was a part of the song on the television show, but received some attention while playing it live in concert in the 70s.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 20:47, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Beverly Hillbillies Theme" reference 
Talk:Vernon Carrington

message: AFAIK, Prophet Gad and the Twelve Tribes of Israel, one of the Mansions of Rastafari, have nothing to do with messianic Judaism. They are a part of the Rastafari Movement. 84.165.187.220 (talk)  —Preceding comment was added at 16:57, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Messianic Judaism?
Talk:Vicente de Cadenas y Vicent

message: This article contains a list of organizations which Vicente de Cadenas y Vicent is said to have founded, such as the Instituto Internacional de Genealogía y Heráldica, Instituto Luis de Salazar y Castro, Colegio Mayor Marqués de la Ensenada, Casasolar Santo Duque de Gandia, and Casa Quinta Vita Natural Durante.  There are no articles on these organizations on the English Wikipedia and a Google search does not produce relevant English language results (or many links at all).  This article is not the place to provide a detailed account of each organization, but there needs to be enough information to explain why Cadenas starting that organization was notable. My guess is that there is information on many of these groups in Spanish language sources.  Unfortunately, I do not feel that my knowledge of Spanish is sufficient to undertake the task of expanding this article.  Johnwilliammiller (talk) 09:29, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Organizations Founded by Vicente de Cadenas y Vicent
Talk:Something Kinda Ooooh

message: Please do not add this to either Main Topic or the discussion page. No matter how much you like Girls aloud, this isn't the place to express those feelings. Peterwill 18:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graffiti 

message: We need a narrative themes section.
--Bacon Man (talk) 19:55, 3 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Narrative themes  

message: This song contains a sample Moguai's song "Get:On". 95.223.2.41 (talk) 03:50, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moguai sample
Talk:The Sound of Girls Aloud: The Greatest Hits

message: Close, but no cigar. They printed the Flag of Côte d'Ivoire instead. I guess our Nadine didn't see the album cover proofs. Stu ’Bout ye! 09:39, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Flag of Ireland]] 
Talk:Checkerboarding (beekeeping)

message: "Apparently, at the first time this type of backfilling behavior starts is the best time to do the Checkerboarding intervention."
Does the word have to be capitalized like above? I don't think it's necessary.
ICE77 (talk) 04:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capital spelling 

message: This article describes a novel method of beekeeping that was suggested in 1996 by one beekeeper after trying it for one year.  There was a call for testers in 2006 but nothing came of it.  There were no control hives, there was no control period preceding or following the experiment year, and the experiment took place in one location only.  Bee hive performance depends greatly on location and weather, so you can't prove a method in just one year in just one location.
I can't find this specific method of swarm control anywhere else in beekeeping literature.  Furthermore, the assumptions are not universally agreed on. -- leuce (talk) 12:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove article? Too trivial for Wikipedia 

message: The first 2 lines of this article have 2 sources. The rest has 0 sources. I think this article is useful but it also needs to be paired with sources. I wonder where the source of the bullets at the end comes from.
ICE77 (talk) 07:13, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lack of sources
Talk:Poly1305

message: I was amused by the use of "whopping" in the article, and whadda ya' know, it's in the paper, too:  http://cr.yp.to/mac/poly1305-20050329.pdf page 1, last paragraph.   scot 15:24, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Whopping 2<sup>75</sup>?

message: According to http://cr.yp.to/mac.html , "32-byte secret key" (that is, 32*8=256 bits) is used. However, in the article: "…using a 128-bit AES key…". Looks like inconsistency to me. Lambdadmitry (talk) 10:57, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: AES key size inconsistency

message: It seems to me that referencing RFC 7539 is not appropriate to the article.  The article is about "Poly1305-AES", whereas RFC 7539 defines Poly1305 without AES -- instead of using a key generated by AES and an additional key, the RFC referenced defines using ChaCha20 to generate both keys.
IMO, either the reference to 7539 should be moved to a new article, or the article should be renamed.
: I renamed the article. Dchestnykh (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 22:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixing / Inappropriate references?
Talk:Walter Ernsting

message: the book "Clark Darlton: Der Mann, der die Zukunft brachte" says that Ernsting joined the German Wehrmacht voluntarily.  Ernsting was not conscripted against his will -Hexadec (talk) 21:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Military service
Category talk:Fictional telepaths

message: Why isn't Professor Xavier on this list? There are loads more telepaths in comics that aren't on this list, and even in computer games. Warhammer 40,000 has a lot of telepaths too. I'd add it myself if I knew how, but I'm still a nOOb.
Silver Fang 11:57, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Professor Xavier 

message: Why isn't Carrie (the character in the Stephen King novel by the same name) on this list?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.27.112.134 (talk) 13:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Carrie

message: They are telepathic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AleksanderVatov (talk • contribs) 19:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding "Inheritance" dragon riders/dragons/magicians 

message: Characters that need to be added: Lord Voldemort, Severus Snape, Albus Dumbledore, and Queenie Goldstein. Obversa (talk) 17:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters that need to be added to this category