Talk:High color

message: For anyone who wishes to enhance the article visually, there's a series of image I've uploaded to the Commons:
* :Image:Park-TruColor-24BPP.png (24-bit truecolour reference image)
* :Image:Park-HiColor-16BPP.png (16-bit highcolour version)
* :Image:Park-HiColor-15BPP.png (15-bit highcolour version)
The thing is, I don't know how to incorporate it into the articles, because 1) I don't know how to fit the images, even as thumbnails, without wreaking havoc on the page layout, and 2) when presented as thumbnails, the scaling resamples the images, thereby rendering them useless for the colour depth demonstration unless the reader follows the links to the full-sized images. --Shlomi Tal ☜ 20:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful demonstration images 

message: I can see the blue in the graphic fine too. What is written in this article is incorrect. the blues are possible to see easily. That's why you're right.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orhosh (talk • contribs) 17:29, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  You Are Right 

message: Wikipedia:Avoid self-reference states that articles should avoid assuming that the article is being read on a screen, as this one does. I suggest being more vague and saying something like "this demonstration may not work if the colors in the image have not been correctly preserved". Dcoetzee 22:58, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-reference 

message: Some people have sensitive eyes to blue light more than average, so for them it is not next to impossible to see blue light. In addition, I think that's true for almost everyone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orhosh (talk • contribs) 16:59, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Note 

message: What the heck is this? I know RGB, and RGBA, and both of those are covered in the article behind the RGBAX hyperlink ... but not RGBAX itself. What's the X for? 193.63.174.211 (talk) 13:48, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Came across the term in the RGBA discussion, it seems that the described format either doesn't exist or is used in a very limited context. All I found so far was a Java implementation for the type, but even there it just labels the X as unused (making it all the more confusing). The original sources were apparently all circle referencing each other via backups of older page versions and originated from the BMP file format page. Rainforce15 (talk) 14:26, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  RGBAX? 

message: The reason I added the template is because the section below it appears to be conflating how much each component contributes to the perceived brightness of the color with to what degree one is able to distinguish colors in which these are varied. See http://www.poynton.com/notes/colour_and_gamma/ColorFAQ.html#RTFToC10 -- Dissident (Talk) 21:32, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dispute 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on High color. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091211192807/http://code.msdn.microsoft.com:80/PDC08WhitePapers to http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/PDC08WhitePapers
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "Because of this, the color RGB (40, 40, 40) will have a slight purple (magenta) tinge when displayed in 16 bits"
Should it actually be more greenish, since the green channel will have higher value (5, 10, 5)?
NorthsteelL (talk) 02:08, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Purple tinge when displayed in 16 bits?