lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Violin Concerto (Mendelssohn)

message: Is this a duplicate article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concerto_for_Violin_and_Strings_(Mendelssohn)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Whyameye (talk • contribs) 15:01, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: No.  This is *the* violin concerto, the famous one in E minor.  The other article is for a D minor work that he wrote as a child.  I can understand the confusion. The D minor work was obscure enough that it never caused the two of them to be "numbered", but its becoming more commonly recorded and performed that it ended up being "article-worthy".  DavidRF (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicate article?

message: In a "standard classical orchestra" from a few decades earlier the French horn was not yet invented and the horns would have been natural horns. So I propose to change "standard classical orchestra" to "standard orchestra of its period." Marlindale (talk) 01:03, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Instrumentation, horns 

message: The Lead was recently revised to say this, but the body of the article seems not to support it. Marlindale (talk) 04:21, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  David's advice mostly ignored? 

message: There was a sentence in the article saying 
:This led to Mendelssohn's concerto being regarded as one of the most plagiarised of all time.
This cannot be right.  Possibly "imitated" is correct.  What is the correct source?  The Web page cited is not the right one; it has many links but the right one is not clear.  I have commented this sentence out, pending clarification.  Zaslav (talk) 07:10, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarized? 

message: That's an edit summary for a recent reversion in the article. Marlindale (talk) 23:04, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, but the long-standing phrase "the violin concertos of Tchaikovsky […] and Sibelius" was correct because the phrase "the violin concerto of Tchaikovsky […] and Sibelius" seems to point to concerto by Tchaikovsky and Sibelius, and there's no such thing. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:50, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree now. Marlindale (talk) 03:10, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tchaikovsky wrote only one violin concerto
Talk:KVAW

message: An update with regards to KVAW's status is needed… but I can say with certainty that the license has been canceled (PDF) by the Federal Communications Commission for, in effect, failing to have had an actual authorization to speak off since the summer of 2009.  Apparently there have been many silent periods for the station over the years, though I don't know if it's currently on or not.  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Done - article rewritten with ample references.  dhett (talk • contribs) 04:40, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update may be needed? (license revoked) 

message: The KVAW saga continues, apparently: the FCC has now reinstated (PDF) the station's license, "[p]ursuant to Section 1.108 of the Commission’s rules," but didn't elaborate as to what led to this turn of events.  While I'm still not sure that KVAW is on the air currently, this does seem to clear the way for a sale that might actually lead to actual programming once again — in other words, it isn't as defunct as we thought.  In the meantime, an additional update might be needed… --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:47, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: KVAW is silent; it was the station's filing for Silent STA in December 2010 that alerted the FCC that they had been broadcasting without authorization.  There are 475,000 reasons why the beneficiaries of the Estate of Joseph Zavaletta are feeling much better now.  I'll make the proper modifications this week.  dhett (talk • contribs) 23:52, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Done. dhett (talk • contribs) 08:15, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  KVAW not defunct? 

message: As of 2015, here's what I've been able to figure out about KVAW:
*The station is operating, possibly on physical channel 24. It brands as "Channel 24" though its programming is in Spanish. NRT is Núcleo Radio y Televisión, a binational media group owned by Rolando González Treviño; their media holdings include some Mexican cable systems, two Monclova, Coah. FMs, cable channels in Monclova, Saltillo and Sabinas, and KVAW. NRT is involved in a money laundering scandal that involves Humberto Moreira, the ex-governor of Coahuila.
:*González Treviño comes from a media family. His brother Roberto Casimiro González Treviño owns XHRCG-TV Saltillo, a bunch of cable systems and some FMs. Roberto's son owns R Communications Group, a radio and TV company in Texas that also operates RCG's Ciudad Acuña radio stations.
*Their Web presence is absolutely horrible. There's one Facebook page but almost none of its content is public. ()
*The station is located at 2290 N. Veterans Blvd., not 2524 as the FCC lists. The studios and transmitter are at that facility, and you can see a KVAW "24" wrapped van if you use Google Street View.
I'm not sure about their programming at all. TitanTV doesn't lump them in with the SA stations, so there's no way to tell. They do promote on the Facebook page "NRT Noticias" on weekday afternoons, but... Raymie (t • c) 20:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another update needed
Talk:Peter Vallone Jr.

message: So none considers it the least bit relevant that he's a member of a three generation political dy nasty that has been running a large portion of Queens for decades? 72.229.225.172 (talk) 02:34, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Family 
Talk:WJLP

message: Robert McAllan the CEO having answered my email i know as a fact KVNV call letters will be changed to WJLP when the move finally happens. The noticed i got in my bill from Comcast still referred to the station as KVNV SD & HD. Someone had chained my quote of that notice to WJLP . I have now changed that back to KVNV.
DLA75 (talk) 23:59, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  KVNV call letter change to WJLP
Talk:KWHB

message: Why did you have to cancel this show? It was my favorite TV show! Please return to Little House on the Prarie-the Cosby show is very cheesy!
thanks,
prayerbear5439@att.net  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.149.54.232 (talk) 00:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Little House on the Prairie 

message: Is this the Channel 7 with an occassional Cherokee language show and other American Indian programs I heard about out of Tulsa? If not correct, my mistake. KOED 3 and KETA 13 (the OETA Network), and KRSC 35 have about 3 hours daily of Native American oriented programs on public television. + 71.102.3.86 (talk) 05:06, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Native American oriented programs 
Talk:KWHE

message: KWHE turned off its analog signal and is digital-only.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.106.150 (talk) 19:50, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital Transition 
Talk:Petru Filip

message: all of this articles information is written in the introduction, it needs a separate section to organize content.TheHappiestCritic (talk) 01:50, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Biography
Talk:Phan Khắc Sửu

message: *if this guy lived from 1905-1970 as the atricle states, how in the world could he possibly be an octogenarian?--Jackyd101 08:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to most sources, he should have been born in 1905. I think this is more reliable. 源義信 (talk) 12:11, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Talk:KXLT-TV

message: It doesn't exist. I'm looking at it right now and there is only 47.1 being transmitted. That's all they have been transmitting for years now, ever since their digital transmitter went hot. TitanTV also does not list a 47.2 subchannel, RTN or otherwise. RTN lists them as an affiliate on their site but the reality of it is there is no RTN on 47.2. Also of note is the edit adding 47.2 was done through an ISP from Texas. How would someone from Texas know what's happening in Minnesota? 75.221.109.48 (talk) 22:33, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  RTN Subchannel
Talk:KXMB-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 12:59, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 
Talk:South Shropshire

message: Talk of "disguised unemployment" South Shropshire#Economics and Demographics and "bloody-mindedness" South Shropshire#Politics doesn't fit with the Wikipedia's Neutral Point Of View policy. Furthermore there is a problem with lack of source citation. - Andrew Oakley 22:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have reduced the bias in the economics and politics sections, although some citation of sources may perhaps be necessary for some of the reworded material still. Mouchoir le Souris 17:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neutrality and Citing Sources
Talk:WAKA (TV)

message: It might also be nice to have some more detailed rating information. Living in Montgomery myself, I know that WSFA leads the way by an amazingly huge majority. That's not necessarily clear here, though. Cs92 00:40, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ratings 
Talk:WALA-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 03:37, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material 

message: http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-meredith-time-inc-20171126-story.html
This proposed deal involves Time inc's assets and Meredith's assets coming into one entity. As of  November 2017 the Koch Brothers has been named as people involved in the deal. 
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/26/business/dealbook/time-inc-meredith-corporation-koch-brothers.html?_r=0  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.86.14.44 (talk) 22:56, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pending Deal with Meredith and Time inc
Talk:WAPT (TV)

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 22:49, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material
Talk:WATM-TV

message: This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image :File:Abc23(07logo).jpg, found on :WATM-TV, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator.  STBotI (talk) 15:07, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: An image on this page may be deleted
Talk:First playable demo

message: Not sure this can stand on its own, especially since there is already Video game development#First playable. I suggest we merge this into that section and redirect the title. Also posting at Talk:Video game development#Merge from First playable demo, since the {merge to} template links to that talk page. (So I guess this should be discussed there.) - dcljr (talk) 20:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:WBOY-TV

message: Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to a list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:
#WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information."  As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.  
#As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced. 
# WP:NLIST tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article. 
#Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.
If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable.  Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. 70.48.216.22 (talk) 00:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material
Talk:Philip Ludwell

message: We have a conflict of sources on whether Philip Ludwell or his son, Philip Ludwell, Jr., was Speaker of the House of Burgesses in 1695. Lyon Gardiner Tyler, Encyclopedia of Virginia Biography, vol. 1 (1915), says Ludwell Jr. was elected as the youngest Speaker ever (he would have been 23 at the time) with his father's influence playing a part. Jon Kukla, Speakers and Clerks of the Virginia House of Burgesses 1643-1776 (1981) says it was Ludwell Sr., citing a remark by Governor Edmund Andros the day before the Speaker's election about Ludwell Sr.'s election as a burgess from James City County and referring to him as the "Reputed Governor of Carolina".
Does anyone out there have other reliable sources independent of these two that can be used to resolve the matter? Rklear (talk) 19:07, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Philip Ludwell, Sr., was the Speaker of the House of Burgesses in 1695, as is listed in the Journals of the House of Burgesses of Virginia, 1619-1776. Philip Ludwell, Jr., was not selected to the House of Burgesses until 27 October 1697, when he replaced the deceased William Sherwood (page 108). Benuski (talk) 20:03, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speaker of the House of Burgesses in 1695 - Ludwell Senior or Junior? 

message: Yesterday I split this article and created a new one for his son. The North Carolina materials (one article from the 6-volume Encyclopedia of North Carolina, and a more recent online revision) explained his Virginia involvement inadequately, and the best Virginia source I found did not mention his Carolina affairs. I appreciated the recent encyclopediavirginia article about his second wife, which put matters into perspective for me. However, clearly the sources disagree, and I've done the best that I could. Since I've spent much more time on this than I expected (only in part because of irritation that my phone suddenly restarted moments after I published the first edit), I did not clean up the citation format, which I hope someone else (or others) can.Jweaver28 (talk) 21:34, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  more work needed
Talk:Philip Sassoon

message: Different popular sources (e.g. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Sassoon-The-Worlds-Philip-Sybil/dp/0300186762) claim that he was a homosexual. Any thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AloysiusZimmerfloss (talk • contribs) 19:48, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Sexuality

message: Sassoon may or may not have been homosexual, but I would question the statement that he was openly homosexual, for two reasons. Firstly homosexuality would have prevented him holding the official positions that he held. Secondly the source is a book which refers in the title to secrecy and Westminster. That rather suggests a hidden homosexuality.Royalcourtier (talk) 00:57, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Openly homosexual 

message: ...and his ancestors were somewhat unlikely to have been badly mistreated by Royalists.   Anmccaff (talk) 17:44, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  l'[[Ancien_Régime]] wasn't very big in Baghdad
Talk:Philippe Gigantès

message: I have added the link to him being interned in Korea with George Blake and cited Roger Hermiston (2013) The Greatest Traitor: The Secret Lives of Agent George Blake. However, I only have access to the audio book, and can not narrow the reference down to a page. It would be useful if anyone with the book could add the page reference.
KreyszigB (talk) 09:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Interned with George Blake
Talk:Phraya Manopakorn Nitithada

message: The dates given for Phraya Mano's premiership are logically impossible. iescothailand Iescothailand (talk) 05:51, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: List of Prime Ministers of Thailand lists Phraya Manopakorn Nititada (1884-1948):
* [Cabinet #] 1 [from] 28 June 1932 [by] House of Representatives Resolution [to] 10 December 1932 [by] New "Permanent" Constitution Promulgated [policy date] No Formal Policy Declaration None
* [Cabinet #] 2 [from] 10 December 1932 [by] House of Representatives Resolution [to] 1 April 1933 [by] House Dissolution by emergency Royal Decree 20 December 1932
* [Cabinet #] 3  [from] 1 April 1933  [by] Royal Decree [to] 21 June 1933 Removed by: 1933 coup d'état  [policy date] 1 April 1933
--Pawyilee (talk) 01:04, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates 

message: Suggest moving Phraya Manopakorn Nititada to Manopakorn Nititada — Phraya is a Thai royal and noble title; Manopakorn Nititada is his name, and redirects here. It should be the reverse.  Pawyilee (talk) 09:59, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, no. Manopakorn Nititada is his title. His name is Kon Hutasingha, but no one calls him that. It is standard practice to include the rank (phraya) when referring to someone by title. --Paul_012 (talk) 16:28, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, OK. Goofed. --Pawyilee (talk) 01:26, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: Just thought I share this but if you Google generic generals for hearts of iron 4 his picture is very commonly used for minor Asian leaders. Thought I share. 2603:8000:AF00:8569:2C97:77E5:6452:C69A (talk) 23:55, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  hearts of iron 4 portrait
Talk:WCJB-TV

message: sometime within the past few years, WCJB has had a HUGE drop off in production values. The newscast is full of technical diffuclties, and the newsroom set and picture quality look worse than a high school TV production class. This wasn't always the case. Anyone know what happened?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.1.227.50 (talk) 21:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:WCML

message: First of all, I like this page as a dismbig instead of a straight redirect to West Coast Main Line.  But since the WCML station does not have its own article, and is just a repeater station, should that line point to the main television station article at WCMU-TV? -- Satori Son 15:06, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind – I found the existing redirect at WCMU-TV and fixed the redlink here. -- Satori Son 15:11, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Television Station

message: *https://pageviews.wmcloud.org/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&redirects=0&range=latest-20&pages=WCMU-TV|West_Coast_Main_Line|Women%27s_Caucus_for_the_Modern_Languages|WCMU-FM|Working_Class_Movement_Library — Preceding unsigned comment added by JuniperChill (talk • contribs) 13:45, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to views for RM
Talk:Pierre-Étienne Flandin

message: I suppose these things are always debatable, but importance "in politics" for purposes of this assessment is relative to all of history. Here we have an individual who was PM of France for less than seven months at a time when the country's international power was at an ebb. PM is not the highest office in French government, falling below the President of France -- in this case, Albert Lebrun, who held that office for eight years from 1932 to 1940. Lebrun is classed as high-importance for France, but mid-importance for politics. BD2412 T 05:19, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, that's persuasive; self-reverted. Mathglot (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Political importance