Talk:Soil mechanics

message: This is one of those very general articles.  I am using this as a general template and expanding the subsections. --Zeizmic 15:07, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing

message: Hi, I want to dramatically edit the soil mechanics page. Any objections if I do the following:
*Rewrite the introduction.
*Delete Shear Strength section, and merely link to Shear_strenth, and other relevant topics such as friction, Coefficient_of_friction -the topic as written appears to be covered mostly by these links, and this avoids doubling up.
GeoEng 19:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The intro could definitely use a rewrite as it does not really explain what soil mechanics is as much as who uses it or where it is used. As for dumping sections on shear strength, etc., the usual convention is to pare those down to one paragraph with a link to the main article. A good example of this exists at Civil engineering where each branch has a small description and a link to the "main article." All-in-all, sounds all right; and you know other editors are (almost) always watching... ZueJay (talk) 19:45, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, I agree with Zuejay, and welcome to Wikipedia GeoEng. Basar 19:48, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  OK thanks. I'll try not to annoy anyone with my edits. In terms of re-organising the geotech pages, may I suggest using the Burland Triangle (From his Nash lecture: "The Teaching of Soil Mechanics, a personal view", 1987. Proc. 9th Conf. Soil Mech & Found Eng) as a rough guide. It essentially separates Geo-Engineering into three main areas, linked to each other. These are: 
*1. Ground Profile: Genesis, SI, Ground Description (Minerology; Classification; Ground water; geological processes). 
*2. Soil Behaviour: Laboratory & Field Testing, Measurement & Observation (Particulate behaviour; effective stress; stress paths; compressibility; Ko, preconsolidation; permeability, consolidation, creep; Drained strength, dilatant & contractant behaviour; excess pwp; undrained strength; critical state framework)
*3. Applied Mechanics: Idealisation, conceptual, physical, analytical modelling (Stress, strain, elasticity, plasticity, limit equilibrium, limit analysis, finite element analysis, soil constitutive models)
At the nexus of the three points it has:
Practice: (Empiricism "based on well winnowed experience"; Insitu testing; Atterbergs; bearing capacity; earth pressure; geotechnical processes;(other design aspects) etc). 
"soil mechanics", whilst retaining links to "Ground Profile" & "Practice" topics, it essentially is better described as covering Soil Behaviour and Applied Mechanics groups. In this sense, I think items relating to "Ground Profile" and "Practice" should be moved to link directly from Geotechnical Engineering (eg. Ground Investigation, Bearing Capacity -comes under Foundation Design, Slope Stability -comes under Slope processes), whilst aspects relating to Soil Behaviour and Applied Mechanics should stay within Soil Mechanics. This is fairly logical, and Geotechnical Engineering already has the more practical (less theoretical) aspects.
I think once the framework is there, we can work on developing each subgroup, gradually becomming more detailed as we (and others) see fit. GeoEng 20:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Some good suggestions here - have moved this over to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geotechnical engineering where it can be more readily discussed. I need to reread this and consider it a bit more before voicing a reasonably thought-out opinion. ZueJay (talk) 21:01, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: More editing

message: The section of soil liquefaction needs to get incorporated into shear strength.
And I agree with the previous comments: the shear strength needs to be simplified and referenced to the main article about it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.74.26.76 (talk • contribs) 03:42, July 20, 2007 (UTC)
:Ya, a lot of this article has not been touched in a very long time, including the shear strength section. Feel free to make whatever modifications you see fit. -- Basar (talk · contribs) 03:50, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The changes seem OK to me. I don't mind major edits. -- Basar (talk · contribs) 01:28, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Editing of Shear Strength and Soil Liquefaction

message: This is what I propose:
The Soil Mechanics article should deal strictly with the basic theories of Soil Mechanics: Soil Structure, Soil Classification, Shear Strength, Seepage, Consolidation...
Topics such as: Soil Liquefaction, Ground Investigation etc. belong to the Geotechnical Engineering article.
I have not decided if Slope Stability, Bearing Capacity and Lateral Earth Pressure should go into the Soils Mechanics article or the Geotechnical Engineering article. I think the former is more appropriate.
Please comment sanpaz75 00:51, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think you are right about the split between soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. I have tried to follow this distinction too when I was sorting those respective categories: :Category:Soil mechanics and :Category:Geotechnical engineering. It would seem to me too that slope stability, bearing capacity, and lateral earth pressure would be best in soil mechanics as they don't involve specific design recommendations. I'll try to clean up somethings in this article too to try to help. -- Basar (talk · contribs) 01:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-defining the scope of the Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering articles

message: I have modified the first section of this article titled "Basic Soil Characterisitcs".
I based the definition on the book by Mitchell (see references). It explains that the soil has 3 phases, and explains each phase. A short introduction is given on soil mineralogy and soil structure.
To continue with the same idea for other section, I suggest opening a new article Soil(engineering), which will expand all this concepts (mineralogy, structure, fabric, composition, interparticle forces etc).
Please comment. 
Sanpaz 05:02, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I would like to see those concepts expanded on too. I, however, would prefer to see the topics added to the article soil and the articles on types of soil like clay or sand. I have given my thoughts on the soil talk page, but they are essentially that I think the topic of soil should be integrated with other academic disciplines that deal with soil and because it is the standard way of dealing with this situation on Wikipedia. – Basar (talk · contribs) 05:57, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree with you that the article soil should have all these concepts integrated. Geology, Pedology, and Geotechnical Engineering certainly use different definitions for the term soil. I think it is important to acknowledge this fact is some clear manner. Creating a Soil(engineering) page would address the specific aspects of soils that matter to civil engineers. Sanpaz 15:52, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition of Soil 

message: is a term frequently used in books on the subject. --Rainald62 (talk) 23:20, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pressure bulb 

message: I am curious about how it is that on flat ground soil builds up. Specifically why it is that on flat ground soil builds up to cover things that archaeologists later find. So far I seem to have found out that things being covered up is likely at the bottom of, for example, a hill. That makes immediate sense. I have also seen that wind can carry particles of whichever kind so that could explain some of it. Another thing that makes sense is if something is demolished on the ground in question or nearby. Any assistance you can give, such as links to articles will be gratefully received. --bodnotbod (talk) 19:40, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been Googling and one thing that simply didn't occur to me would be plants decaying on the surface. I realise there's many other processes that could "add height" to land and I also found Excavation_(archaeology)#Site_formation, so I'm basically happy just with what I've discovered, so nobody need now reply. If somebody does, however, then I shall read the replies. --bodnotbod (talk) 20:34, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: River flooding is another mechanism which deposits soil on flat areas. Also, in areas with a dry season, sand dunes can move - about 8000 years ago, when San Francisco was an island, sand dunes moved enough to block an outlet to the bay, and built up to a height of over 100 feet in the years since then. Argyriou (talk) 16:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layman's questions 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.ca/books?id=idlOAQAAIAAJ. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:59, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed