lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:551st Electronic Systems Wing

message: 51st Troop Carrier Wing should be merged into this page per WP:MILMOS#UNITNAME (An article about a unit should be placed at "Name (optional disambiguator)". The name should generally be the official name used by the armed forces to which the unit belongs.  When a unit or base has had multiple names over the course of its existence, the title should generally be the last name used.  This article already included two of the three units consolidated, but omitted the 51st Troop Carrier Wing.  The current article on the 51st only escapes being a stub by its formatting.  Particularly in view of the long time this wing served as the 551st Airborne Early Warning & Control Wing, I believe the exception allowed in cases where the subject is clearly more commonly known by one of the previous names does not apply. --Lineagegeek (talk) 17:04, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Please make any comments tentative.  There seems to be more historical material on the 51st Wing than is reflected in the current article, and it needs to be developed before a merger can be rationally assessed.  --Lineagegeek (talk) 00:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: My instinct is that while the two units may have a shared lineage they are two different entities in terms of what they did. The 51st Troop Carrier may be a stub at the moment but is that because there is nothing to say about it, or because nothing has yet been written about it on wikipedia? I also  suspect post merge that incoming links from other articles would be predominately to the WWII unit. GraemeLeggett (talk) 08:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  After finding all that material on the 51st, I tend to agree with you that in the end the 51st page is the place for the merged article.   has pretty much said as much on his talk page.  If he chimes in here, I think we have consensus on putting the merged article on the 51st page.  Thanks for adding the Hadrian comment.  Even though these were AAF gliders, I think with British aircrew on the early missions and British paras on almost all, they can be fairly said to be "on British service." --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:25, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, merge it all to 51 TCW, and opener something like "The 51 TCW was a blah blah blah during World War II, which also saw less notable postwar service doing AEW and electronics development under other designations.." Buckshot06 (talk) 09:48, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:70th Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Wing

message: This site http://www.afisr.af.mil/units/ indicates 70 IW is part of AFISR rather than ACC.  Which is correct?
131.38.214.8 (talk) 22:17, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is 70 IW part of ACC or AFISR? 
Talk:480th Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Wing

message: I seems as if all of this info was just copied and pasted  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.31.91.109 (talk) 22:08, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Scrip of Edo period Japan

message: be moved to hansatsu? Nik42 09:54, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I call it hansatsu but named the article "Scrip of Edo period Japan" with Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Use English words in mind. There is, of course, the term "Edo" in the title but I guess it's more widely understood than hansatsu. What's your feeling? Fg2 10:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I also prefer the English term because it's more inclusive. There are a variety of topics touched upon here (which I may expand upon if I ever feel like it and get around to it) which are not covered under hansatsu. Of course, I don't think that the term "scrip" is really all that common and obvious to the average reader, either... but that's besides the point. It is more accurate and appropriate than "money" or "paper money", so, it's fine with me. LordAmeth 19:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Should this
Talk:La Piedad

message: If you go to the Sister Cities International page, and look up "La Piedad, Mexico" its not there. "La Piudad", however, is there. Is this a typo on the behalf of Sister Cities International??? Because both on this wiki page, and on Woodland, CA's wiki page it says they are sister cities when in reality, Sister Cities International doesn't say so.
Any suggestions???Killiondude (talk) 06:55, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved. Sister City International made a typo on their website. Killiondude (talk) 06:42, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sister Cities
Talk:Amalgam Virgo

message: As if by chance, surprise, surprise, a short time later the USA suffered the September 11 attacks. But such connections cannot be elaborated on in wikipedia. Any hints are deleted immediately, instead of being furnished with easy to find references. Just like TV news, we are supposed to be born yesterday. 85.197.19.140 (talk) 14:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia supports born yesterdayism 

message: The entomopter is referenced on pages 26 and 29 of the Amalgam Virgo presentation. Prof. Robert C. Michelson holding an initial version of the Reciprocating Chemical Muscle, and the International Aerial Robotics Competition web site lead picture from 2000 are featured on page 29. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.176.0.89 (talk) 05:01, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Entomopter usage
Talk:World (theology)

message: Any objections to adding an Anabaptist section?  Quite a bit of Anabaptist theology revolves around separation from 'the world.' Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 19:46, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure, and another area that needs expansion is Sufi theology, which is similar.  Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 20:44, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I'll see what I can put together.  I know there are a lot of good sources available on Anabaptist theology.  A Sufi section would be great too, though I am almost totally unfamiliar with their theology so probably can't contribute much. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 23:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anabaptist section? 

message: I'm not sure if it fit and, if so, where it would go, but the term "worldling" is used within some Christian sects to denote non-believers. Surv1v4l1st (Talk|Contribs) 23:33, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Worldlings
Talk:Strategic Air Command & Aerospace Museum

message: Parts of this article seem to be derived from a tourist brochure or the museum's website. The assertion that the museum is "regarded as the nation's foremost facility of its kind" has no reputable organization backing up that claim. 
Maybe someone has additional sources about the museum that can objectivize this a little more. Jessep28 (talk) 17:17, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I have gone though and tried to edit the article to clean up a lot of the copyright violations, however almost the entire article is taken directly from the museum's official website. I'm too tired to finish this up right now but will try to work on it some more in the future, it still needs a lot of work and more references.Civilengtiger (talk) 04:30, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:Alfred W. Crosby

message: Although I've added much more content, it is not appearing on the page.  Can someone please explain why the edits entered are not appearing?
Stormie -- Thank you for fixing the reference tags and allowing the rest of the edits to go live!  MJG for BJP
Link to review of ecological imperialism not working  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.155.21 (talk) 19:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The reference to teaching at the Alexander Turnball Library needs checking.  The Library does not carry out any teaching. Alan Liefting 19:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Alexander Turnball Library

message: Serious work needed on neutrality. What reliable published sources support the main thrust of the article: that Alfred Crosby has been eclipsed by Jared Diamond? If there aren't any, this is well into original research as "unpublished analysis or synthesis of published material that appears to advance a position". Tearlach 22:17, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed much of that editorial comment in favor of actual discussion of Crosby. I have left the neutrality dispute tag in place, but would welcome another editor reviewing the current revision and removing it at their discretion. --SuperNova |T|C| 08:26, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Comments regarding Jared Diamond in this article at this time appear to be neutral and pertinent.  Will remove neutrality tag. --Csonnich 03:23, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality
Talk:Estat Català

message: Hi,
I created this page on December 15 of 2006. It is a direct translation from the Catalan article of the same name. There may be some expression errors and I'll be glad if someone corrects them.
I have changed some things because the catalan article is clearly partial.
Onofre Bouvila 04:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 

message: There is a own picture about a Estat Català pin in Commons that I want to insert in the article Makoki13 (talk) 22:30, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Estat Català pin picture
Talk:Honorable Service Lapel Button

message: Why is the name of this article Ruptured Duck if it is a slang name for the Honorable Service Lapel Pin?  Wouldn't it make more sense to call it Honorable Service Lapel Pin with a redirect from Ruptured duck (military decoration)?   Jons63 02:31, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: With no comments against the move I moved the page to Honorable Service Lapel Pin Jons63 22:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruptured Duck? 

message: The article states that the emblem is awarded to "[US] military service members who were discharged under honorable conditions during World War II". This implies to me that all members of the armed forces qualify, regardless of whether they served in active combat, were confined to desk jobs at home or served in intelligence (G-2) outside the war zones. However, I have a source from 1946 (Rex Stout, "Instead of Evidence" in Trouble in Triplicate, 1949, story originally pub. 1946) which clearly implies that only combat vets qualify—specifically, a G-2 vet who worked in the US did not qualify. Unfortunately, the source is fiction, so not reliable IMO in WP terms. Ref. 1 appears to be a dead link, & I couldn't find in a quick search anything relevant. Can anyone clarify? --D Anthony Patriarche, BSc (talk) 17:06, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qualification
Talk:Baby New Year

message: Can we get another picture for Baby New Year (a quick Google search would turn up many)? The one at the right seems a bit crude --67.72.98.110 04:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. I've added a template above to speed the process. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 17:10, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

text: I removed the req image tag since the page has images now, and also added a Saturday Evening Post cover with an applicable image - AKeen 18:25, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

message: "Attempts to name an official Baby New Year for an entire country have sometimes been made, but generally there are multiple contenders and no single Baby New Year can be confirmed. There has however been a great deal of several who have come close." 76.100.185.254 (talk) 06:27, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Umm... what?

message: hello i just did search mello
mello is an app for children an teenagers it is for children under the age of 1 till 10 thanks i am grateful for the opportunity to right an subject 
from:jacolynn  primoe 41.114.143.189 (talk) 14:51, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  mello app
Talk:Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach: The Complete Works

message: Are the Sing-Akademie manuscripts in fact located in the Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin? I thought they were located in the Sing-Akademie library... I can't find any mention of this on the edition website... At the very least, they're cataloged separately... I'll look into this! --Tagith 05:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The Sing-Akademie
Talk:Tucker L. Melancon

message: Something needs to be done about the Notable cases section, particularly this passage:
In all fairness to him, however, there is a strong argument in favor of taking such an approach. Some, like the scholar and Civil Rights activists Peter Irons, author of, among many other works, Jim Crow's Children: The Broken Promise of the Brown Decision would say that if more judges would be so "heavy handed," there might be a lot more progress on this colossal problem.
Unfortunately, heavy handed judicial action has frequently resulted in the opposite of its intended effect, as described in the 2003 book The End of Desegregation? by Caldas and Bankston. New Orleans, Baton Rouge, and several smaller districts in Louisiana were examined and the general result was a) increased segregation within the system and b) a decline in public support for the school system as families left the system and moved children into private schools, or moved to neighboring districts leaving behind the poorest and most vulnerable populations. Recent approaches suggest that voluntary plans and magnet schools hold more promise to bring races together and maintain high academic achievement (see C. Rossell The Carrot or the Stick for School Desegregation Policy (1990) and Rossell and Armor The Effectiveness of School Desegregation Plans, 1968 – 1991 (1996)), something that "heavy handed" federal judges have not been able to accomplish.
--Ultra Megatron (talk) 06:20, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this passage should be changed to be neutral. I wrote it a few years ago, and now see that it's too opinionated and not encyclopedic, as it should be. If anyone wants to take a stab at rewriting this article, be my guest. :) --Ashley Rovira (talk) 02:43, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the part that was objectionable for its bias. --ACRSM 05:52, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Tucker L. Melancon was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 15:36, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:List of freshwater aquarium invertebrate species

message: There are insect aquarium?
Aquarista brasileio (talk) 21:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: good question! You think something with SEA or SALINA would maybe ring a bell Realfakebezalbob (talk) 21:38, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questions
Talk:SIC Comédia

message: While the article is a short one (I wanted to add more details in a few hours, since it is 5 AM here and I was just browsing the site), the page has a lot of relevance.
While the channel is rumored to "die" in the 31st, December 2006 , this very same thing was rumored to happen last year, but it continued airing due to popular request.
*This time is not a rumor. I emailed them directly and it will end because TVCabo doesnt want to continue with the channel anymore. TVCabo is also showing a warning message about the ending. Snewerl 10:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lucy spy ring

message: From the article: "Long after the war, in the 1960s, Roessler offered a somewhat obscure account in interviews with journalists."
I find that fascinating since he apparently died in 1958. Quite the mysterious figure he was. ;)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.5.141.106 (talk) 04:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: (First comment)

message: I’ve substantially re-written this: it was highly un-encyclopaedic as it was, as well as being insultingly un-neutral. The stance taken in the previous text, that Read &Fisher's thesis was entirely correct, is suspect, to say the least; other reliable sources dispute it (actually they say it’s arrant nonsense, but that’d be un-neutral as well).
The correct way to handle this, I understand, is to present both points of view in a "Controversy" section, so that’s what I have done.</br> 
Also the section on the history of "Lucy" said next to nothing about the spy rings actual operation, so I’ve tried to remedy that, as well.</br> 
I trust that is OK with everyone. Xyl 54 (talk) 23:51, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-write 

message: This article more or less duplicates the Roessler article apart from the controversy section which junk (two tv people, not academics, or historians? Why is it even in there) and is essentially a part of the Rote Drei article, where is should be. I'm updating the Alexander Radó article at the moment and at some point will start the expansion of the Rote Drei article at some point in the next couple of years. This whole article could go as already covered by Roessler and the controversy is pure trash. scope_creepTalk 11:50, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Mess
Talk:Nikolay Pavlovich Ignatyev

message: The source cited in footnote five is an article in a notorious white nationalist magazine, "The Occidental Quarterly" (the article is here: https://www.toqonline.com/archives/v8n3/TOQv8n3Devlin.pdf). The author was profiled in the New Republic: https://newrepublic.com/article/145325/alt-right-doesnt-know-white-women  
Considering that the magazine deals in antisemitic conspiracy theories and holocaust denial I don't think it should be cited so extensively or included as a trustworthy source. Curtisdozier (talk) 14:11, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable Source for footnote 5
Talk:Haitian mythology

message: It seems that rather being an overview of Haitian mythology, this is a list of lwa in Haitian Vodou. Perhaps the article name should be changed to reflect that, be divided by "nation" of lwa, and then linked from both the lwa and Vodou articles?Chiwara (talk) 17:28, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: List of Lwa?

message: If this article presents only Haitian Voodoo as Haitian mythology, why is this article needed versus the much more detailed Haitian Vodou? Note that same objection was raised in 2012. David notMD (talk) 09:37, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed. Either Haitian mythology is a superset of the other, in which case this article should be entirely rewritten with a small, summary section about Haitian Vodou and a  link per WP:Summary style, or else the two topics are the same thing, in which case a title should be chosen and the articles merged; probably from this one to Haitian Vodou.  It may be time for a merge discussion. Mathglot (talk) 20:05, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only Haitian Vodou? 

message: Please participate in this discussion:  Talk:Haitian Vodou#Merge proposal. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 04:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 

message: In the article, the related notion for the afterlife is "Guinee" - clicking on the link redirects to the country of Guinea? Instead of Guinea, shouldn't this be referring to "Ginen"? The understood Haitian Vodou afterlife - as Guinea is different from that (being a real country and not a mythic land). No? Massifish (talk) 14:54, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haitian Vodou afterlife redirection (Guinea?) 

message: — Assignment last updated by Hey2023 (talk) 13:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: HUM 202 - Introduction to Mythology
Talk:Petwo lwa

message: Some of this text has been lifted from the webpage http://www.widdershins.org/vol9iss5/06.htm Formicarius (talk) 19:17, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright Problem
Talk:Yoshitomo Tokugawa

message: This man is in :Category:Japanese photographers, which implies that he is a photographer of some note. But the article does not elaborate at all on his photographic career (and of course the majority of photographers do not get articles), and the only source for the claim that he was a photographer is a statement that he made in a book.
I'm inclined to remove him from the category (or vice versa). Persuade me that I'd be wrong to do so. -- Hoary (talk) 11:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No response, so I'm about to remove the category. -- Hoary (talk) 00:36, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at the Japanese Wikipedia article, and it looks like he was a photographer for Honda, but of course that doesn't imply that he's of any fame (as a photographer). Removing the category sounds fine. -Tadakuni (talk) 01:12, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photographer?
Talk:Deep sand bed

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://reefkeeping.com/issues/2008-06/newbie/index.php. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dana boomer (talk) 16:35, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Shipwrecks of Western Australia

message: Rated as start, as I assume this will be expanded.  There is a shipwrecks WikiProject, and you might want to add this.  You might argue that this page is not necessary, but it is probably worthwhile to explain why wrecks are concentrated in one area. Pustelnik (talk) 14:16, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rating
Talk:Flag officer

message: Reference the sentence "In 1857, Congress created the title of "flag officer" as an actual rank of the United States Navy and during the American Civil War the Confederate States Navy" ...
The clause "and during the American Civil War" is a dependent clause within the sentence and modifies the action of "created" only with respect to the object "the Confederate States Navy".  Grammatically, dashes, parentheses, or commas can be used for this action; however, since there was already a comma in the sentence (that couldn't be replaced with a semicolon), parentheses or dashes would be more appropriate.
That said, the sentence should probably be reworded anyway since the US Congress would not have created the rank within the Confederate Navy.  :)  Guess I'll get to it! LOL
Don'tKnowItAtAll (talk) 15:10, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: flag officer grammar

message: Does NATO maintain any formal definition of "flag officer" (e.g. in STANAG 2116), or is its mapping to ranks customary to individual nations/services? — Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 15:07, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  NATO definitions 

message: "Each subsequent promotion requires renomination and re-approval. For the Navy, each flag officer assignment is usually limited to a maximum of two years, followed by either reassignment, reassignment and promotion, or retirement." 2601:640:8304:88D0:D1B0:741E:A97A:5D5A (talk) 05:29, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplicate term - reassignment 

message: In 2004 the US Secretary of Defence has voiced concern about the career management of general and flag officers of the military services.[1]  This aspect of flag officer, as a career opportunity, is interesting, but missing in the article. Curious for opinions about it. Happy New Year whishes to all. - VanArtevelde (talk) 10:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Career