Talk:Sara Paxton

message: I have read these things about why this article failed to acheive GA status, and have come to the conclusion that the picture is a major reason why it has failed. Right now, there is no picture so I am contacting Sara Paxton over her official Myspace account to ask for permission to upload one. Then I know it'll comply with the Fair Use Rationale. Lowri (talk) 15:36, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: I think there are problems at the moment with the lead section (should be a little bit longer and summarise more of the article's content) and 'Early life', which reads like a fan piece and is also in the present tense which can't be right if it's describing her early life.  Otherwise it meets the criteria.  Worldtraveller 23:32, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll remove it from the nominations for now to avoid cluttering it up.  Feel free of course to renominate it when you feel it meets the criteria. Worldtraveller 00:09, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, I think I've fulfilled the requirements now. Mad Jack O'Lantern 00:01, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review

message: The article mentions that Sara Paxton applied to USC but was not accepted.  This seems a bit anomalous, and calls for an explanation - can't just state this and leave it at that.  There must be some reason for the USC decision.  Also, most people apply to more than one program, so there must be more to say about all this.
:Well, all the info we have is what's on the cited source for that bit. She says she wasn't accepted and leaves it at that, so we don't know anything else... Mad Jack 23:32, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Specifically all it says is: "her disappointment at not getting into USC's film program" Mad Jack 23:34, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  USC Application 

message: The Good article nomination for  has failed
:I have failed Sara Paxton's good article nomination on two grounds, one of which really spills into the other creating a third. First, there is not nearly enough content. An article with one section of text and some tables is not Good or Featured Article quality just because it is about a pretty lady. Second, the text that is there could probably use some heavier sourcing, certainly some sourcing on her CD release and hopefully move her IMDB page from an external link to ref'ing filmography info. See Diane Keaton for a truly fantabulous article on an actress. Staxringold 14:32, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: And on further review, the images could use some better info. Staxringold 14:35, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Good articles|Good Article]] [[Wikipedia:Good articles/Nominations|nomination]] has failed 

message: Is Sara PAxton really dead now?Read the stuff below her pic.Alyssacarmillo 04:55, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: She is not dead Fearstorm 14:33, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Death 

message: This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 6, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: Pass
:2. Factually accurate?: Pass - excellent
:3. Broad in coverage?: Pass
:4. Neutral point of view?: Pass
:5. Article stability? Pass
:6. Images?: Fail :Image:DWL.jpg needs a fair use rationale and :Image:Photo06sarapaxton01.jpg needs a more detailed rationale.
When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration.  If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review.  Thank you for your work so far. 
Kindest RegardsThe Sunshine Man 15:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed "good article" nomination

message: I was watching the credits for the popular Nicktoon "SpongeBob SquarePants," and I 'm positive that Sara Paxton's name was on one of the credits for voice talents for the episode containing "Mid-Life Crusteacean". However, the credits went by so fast I couldn't tell which role she played. If anybody could find out what role she played, it should be added to her Career profile because it isn't there.
Eenyminy (talk) 20:06, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I believe that Sara was indeed credited on the programme, as several extras. I think her name has been down for various roles such as "Fish #1" and stuff like that, so it wasn't anything major, but it is relevant and if it's not already up I'll add it. 81.100.55.173 (talk) 15:18, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's something missing... 

message: This page looks like her mom wrote it.  She has a "mixed family" why is this important?  She isn't famous and it seems unnecessary but hey you know whatever.  I'll write one about my sister who is an extra in movies sometimes.  No Offense  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.137.138.45 (talk) 17:49, 16 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this a page? 

message: She is currently dating Nico Tortorella from Make it or break it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.122.2.187 (talk) 03:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Persona life 

message: An image used in this article, :File:SPaxton2.jpg may be deleted per discussion here: Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#File:Sarauntitled.jpg_and_File:SPaxton2.jpg. If a valid fair use rationale can be given, then I suggest that this file be uploaded locally. MorganKevinJ(talk) 14:46, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image used in article 

message: An image used in this article, File:Sara paxton02.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Sara paxton02.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Sara Paxton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100507140004/http://www.hollywoodreporter.com:80/hr/content_display/news/e3ib6c66237fa7a658dc756e3b5a3701416 to http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hr/content_display/news/e3ib6c66237fa7a658dc756e3b5a3701416
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:03, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Sara Paxton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.shns.com/shns/g_index2.cfm?action=detail&pk=AQUAMARINE-DVD-06-16-06
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090310131305/http://www.moviesonline.ca:80/movienews_16453.html to http://www.moviesonline.ca/movienews_16453.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070220041733/http://www.starrymag.com:80/content.asp?ID=1989&CATEGORY=Interviews&PAGE=1 to http://starrymag.com/content.asp?ID=1989&CATEGORY=Interviews&PAGE=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:26, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Sara Paxton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071011235941/http://canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=3427d1a5-b631-40d1-9361-6500bc047cec&k=92485 to http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=3427d1a5-b631-40d1-9361-6500bc047cec&k=92485
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.moviesonline.ca/movienews_16453.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 19:07, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion