Talk:ZTE

message: There are far too many references to the ZTE web sites.  The whole page feels like a ZTE press release.Sanpitch (talk) 05:55, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ZTE press releases 

message: I think there should not be such a comprehensive list of customers.
:I agree. The List of Customers is bizarre. I will delete it.--Lester 08:14, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of Customers 

message: ZTE MF620  is used by Movistar. What about the Linux drivers?. --Mac (talk) 11:32, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linux 

message: Someone tagged the page with:  and:  ...but I don't think it's warranted. I will remove them soon unless someone objects. Fleetham (talk) 06:55, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing "unbalanced" and "" tags 

message: No mention is made of their market dominance in the Mobile Broadband sector, particularly 3GSM dongles and Mobile Broadband routing equipemnt for service providers.
Also no mention of world first http://wwwen.zte.com.cn/en/press_center/news/201002/t20100211_180344.html, first 4g network card.
some references:
http://www.strategyanalytics.com/default.aspx?mod=pressreleaseviewer&a0=4896
http://www.cn-c114.net/583/a521245.html
http://www.rethink-wireless.com/2011/02/01/huawei-zte-continue-wireless-growth.htm
JavaByte (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mobile Broadband - market position 

message: The source sentences, from the already given cite, for my addition that was reverted is:
:'According to a spokesman for the U.S. Treasury Dept., a U.S. company would violate sanctions "if it exports products requiring a license to a third party with the knowledge that its products will end up in Iran." In the case of the U.S. products on the ZTE packing list, many - and possibly all - do not require an export license and the companies say they did not know they were being shipped to Iran.'
and
:'sanctions have not specifically targeted Iran's telecommunications industry ... European Union diplomats said the bloc's 27 governments had reached an agreement in principle to target telecommunications equipment ... But no final decision has been made and there is no target date for implementing such a ban.'
I think those fully justify my addition of "However many of these U.S. products, possibly all, do not require an export license. There are no current international restrictions on exporting telecommunications equipment to Iran.", and I will reinstate it unless anyone can explain why my precis of the already given source id flawed. Rwendland (talk) 18:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies - Iran  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on ZTE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120627043914/http://wwwen.zte.com.cn:80/en/press_center/news/201108/t20110825_247980.html to http://wwwen.zte.com.cn/en/press_center/news/201108/t20110825_247980.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:11, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ZTE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140626022208/http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS24239313 to http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS24239313
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:10, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: As of right now, ZTE as a company still exists. They could theoretically come out of it (albeit unlikely). All the filing (pdf warning) says is that they're ending major operations, but it does specifically state that they have enough money to comply with commercial and legal requirements. Frood 03:06, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The lede is a bit confusing:  it starts with the present tense ("is") but quickly moves to past tense ("operated") with no explanation. The tenses should be brought into accord with each other and with the present (changing) condition. Kdammers (talk) 04:18, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Status of ZTE 

message: "
ZTE was fined a total of US$1.19 billion by the U.S. Department of Commerce of President Donald J. Trump " -- The last part of this sentence seems strange.  Is there some special reason it is included?Kdammers (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Wording

message: How did it come that the Ministry of Aerospace (missing Industry?) did business with telecommunication industry? And the reference [8] reveals nothing relevant with the MoA(E). --Flycici (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Did you know China Aerospace International Holdings was in fact a plastic factory? It is weird in China that in the 1980s, every ministry start their own for-profit business on top of strategic industry, so it is not so weird for ZTE owner. Lenovo was owned by Legend Holdings, which in turn significantly owned by Chinese Academy of Sciences. Also, Peking University was the owner of Founder Group and real estate developer Peking University Resources (Holdings). Despite it is clear that Ministry of Aerospace is part owner of ZTE, the elaboration of the relations should be supported by WP:RS. Matthew hk (talk) 19:02, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The founding of ZTE part 

message: Right now the information on US sanctions and import ban on ZTE is in the history section but there is also a controversies section at the end that includes information on the US, Philippines and Norway. This gives the U.S. actions more weight- should the information to the controversies section or its own section?
Srbsf7 (talk) 02:25, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The controversies section should probably be integrated into the company's history and not be a stand-alone 'Controversy' section per WP:CSECTION. - Amigao (talk) 20:56, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information on US bans- move to controversies section 

message: Chairman info is date from 2017, a update press release from zte web site have a new chairman.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:10BC:432:8500:A522:180:4299:2F66 (talk) 22:02, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chairman outdated 

message: What is your reasoning to remove sourced information that shows The context that even most western firms headquartered in EU, are not divesting from Russia? It is very misleading and frankly an unfair criticism to single out ZTE and make it seem like they are the very few companies refusing to divest. Because that's giving a false  impression. If you disagree I suggest we take it to neutral pov noticeboard as I believe such context is not only necessary. It is absolutely critical to not mislead others in thinking that ZTE is doing something that most companies in the world isn't doing. Context is very necessary here to not mislead. Truth721 (talk) 21:10, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You need a WP:RS that actually mentions ZTE for such context. - Amigao (talk) 21:13, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Context is necessary