lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Fruitarianism

message: I see the dietary veganism link links directly to veganism & I wonder about this being placed right at the top. Before I even start looking for references, it is my opinion that fruitarianism has entirely separate roots from veganism, & is devoid of any animal rights/welfare element and that, historically, it was entirely a health thing perhaps with Biblical roots (e.g. the whole back to eden or fake Essene thing) or at least spiritual roots, e.g. the idea of prana. 
Was there once a dietary vegan page? --Danny Mamby (talk) 08:43, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Veganism started as a diet, it only later became a philosophy. It's now defined by many modern activists as strictly a philosophy but this is irrelevant to this article. The veganism article states it is both a diet and a philosophy. So there is no problem in linking to dietary veganism which redirects there. Psychologist Guy (talk) 11:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Do you have a reference and date for that? --Danny Mamby (talk) 12:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  dietary veganism  

message: I've tried to clean up some of the content, and I think there are far more important improvements to be making than arguing over a single NPOV word. One element that I have seen and is missing is the adoption of drying, freeze drying, or sun cooking by some fruitarians. I don't know if it is the same as with raw fooders who permit cooking up to a specific temperature.
Does anyone care to find any references to it. --Danny Mamby (talk) 12:50, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I doubt there are any reliable references that mention this. But you are correct because in the primary literature I have seen fruitarians mention sun cooking. For example Arnold Ehret, Otto Abramowski and many fruitarians in the past practiced it as have some modern fruitarians like Douglas Graham but no reliable scholarly secondary sources have picked up on this so it is unlikely this sort of information will end up on the article. Psychologist Guy (talk) 19:27, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing content drying and minimal cooking 

message: A fruitarain diet consists primarily of fruits, but leafy greens such as lettuce and celery are quite important in the diet for minerals, proteins and certain vitamins. Aviyaht (talk) 13:03, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leafy greens and vegetables missing 

message: Zhanna Samsonova may have died because of her fruitarian diet. The official cause of death is not yet public, but I'll leave this as a note so someone can check back later. CarlFromVienna (talk) 05:49, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Zhanna Samsonova
Talk:Persian language

message: Could you provide precise page numbers (and perhaps quotes) for these sources? - LouisAragon (talk) 20:22, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: So you can’t provide page numbers and/or quotes? If so, your edit fails WP:VER. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I'll provide it later. There is no WP:DEADLINE--Persian Lad (talk) 21:02, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits 

message: Persia was not the only empire in the Middle East to speak an Indo-European language. What is the connection of Farsi to, e.g., Hittite? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 14:38, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Relation to other languages in the Middle East 

message: Help! I cannot find a reference for this image. It is claimed as "Fatimid" (but this is extremely unlikely in my opinion, the style is more like 14th century Ilkhanid or Jalayarid) and currently appears in the Arabic miniature article. Can someone confirm that the language of the text above and below the miniature is Persian, rather than Arabic? I would personally bet for a version of the Great Ilkhanid Shahnameh. Any thoughts? Any RS reference? पाटलिपुत्र (Pataliputra) (talk) 07:41, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I cannot say for sure, because Persian and arabic are technically equal, I could be wrong, but the fact is that (at least) they're kinda the same, I'm gonna google it and I advise you if I found something about it. 177.105.90.20 (talk) 15:17, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

text: It'd be great if we have reliable sources about it, I definitely don't know how to search, because from what I can tell, there is still no suitable name for this arabic miniature, maybe it really is "Fatimid", anyway, we need (at least) a suitable name for this, otherwise, this edit can't come to no conclusion, and this enigma won't have end, becomin' a endless mystery,i.e, a non-resolved mystery, we soonly need a WP: CORRECT source. 177.105.90.20 (talk) 15:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: 19216811 170.81.161.153 (talk) 17:45, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Enigma
Talk:Furry/Archive 2

message: Due to the length of the talk page (97 kilobytes), the oldest discussions were moved to  Talk:Furry/Archive 1.  Almafeta 08:39, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: This is not a term used in any sort of common parlance. A quick Google search came up with 11 hits for "gay lifestyler" and over 1,450 for "furry lifestyler." I'm changing the text. Dave 18:16, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gay lifestylers
Talk:Flood fill

message: Use of flood fill is not limited to the examples in the introduction text. I've just found flood fill to be useful in an image recognition application, for example.
So, the introduction should probably say something like "Has many uses, among them paint programs, games" or similar... as it probably has even more uses that can't and shouldn't all be stated in the introduction.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.139.196.68 (talk) 20:08, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other uses should be mentioned 

message: The combined scan-and-fill span filler pseudocode has been slowly evolving for a little while now. I can confirm that the current version as of the revision on 24 July 2023 appears to work correctly, after the revision on 24 May 2023 broke the algorithm again. It might be a good idea for editors to verify their edits to the algorithm actually work correctly before submitting their changes.
Here's an image comparison of an implementation of the algorithm across different revisions: https://imgur.com/a/CWqIuMD
In the images, an A-like shape has been drawn in black and the flood fill has been performed with the color red in the hole of the A. The first image shows correct behavior by the current (24 July 2023) revision and some previous revisions that got it right. The second image shows incorrect behavior by several other revisions prior to this, where the fill escapes the enclosing area. Willpowered (talk) 06:09, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scan-and-fill span filler
Talk:Friedrich Hayek

message: This page seems to be biased based on the opinions of a few editors as there seems to be a over playing of Hayek importance in economics and that his works have probably more critics than supporters in the academic world. He has a lot of critics and failure to mention these is a huge issue. Especially since pretty much every other page about economists mention the critics. The fact is there is a very well know debate between Keynes and Hayek where Keynes completely destroyed Hayek theory of the business cycle. There is mention of this is a small part of the life section. But it’s so minor. The fact that there is a whole section of praise but lack of a section of the massive amount of criticism of Hayek is concerning as people who don’t know that Hayek is only revered in right wing and libertarian economic circles will think Hayek is more important to the field than he actually was 72.177.245.124 (talk) 16:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have noticed one thing here- those users who accuse other editors of wikipedia as biased are themselves the most biased ones. You can add a criticism section here if you have relevant secondary sources, nobody is stopping you! 202.168.84.67 (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

text: Do you have any reliable sources regarding criticism of Hayek? X-Editor (talk) 04:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The fact that there is no criticism section of Hayek is concerning 

message: It’s a neuronal network topic. Not the same Hayek 71.34.109.136 (talk) 09:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hayek- Hebb doesn’t belong
Talk:False Claims Act of 1863

message: Who wrote what you submitted? If it was not you who did, do you have permission of the author for this material to be included in Wikipedia? -- SJK
I am the author of the article.  It was originally submitted and published across Ohio as a Law You Can Use article.  There are no limitations on its use or reprinting.  Any questions about the false claims law act forward to my email warnermendenhall@hotmail.com
Ah, so you also wrote the material moved to the Details page that is coppied from http://www.geocities.com/warnermendenhall/Quitampp.htm. The Details page and the main page need to be re-written into the style of a general encyclopedia article. --Stephen Gilbert
Thanks for formatting it properly.  It looks great.  I didnt know how to reformat it after cutting and pasting it.  Warner Mendenhall
The first paragraph has a reference to "Ethics and Computing Boyer".  Is this a book?  I don't have the book so I can't format the reference properly.  In the interim, I am deleting the reference.  Add it when you have the page number.  Thanks!VK35 16:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to "Reforms for American Homeowners and Consumers: President Obama Signs the Helping Families Save their Homes Act and the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act" (White House Press Office, 2009-05-20), the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act (S.386), signed today, "modifies the False Claims Act (FCA) to eliminate the requirement that a false claim be presented to a federal official, or that it directly involve federal funds.  It also amends the FCA reverse false claims provision to ensure that the knowing retention of an overpayment is a violation."  121a0012 (talk) 02:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I should point out that I didn't just stick this in the article because I don't fully understand the nature of and reason for the amendments.  Hopefully someone with appropriate resources and knowledge can survey the coverage of this bill in the legal press and write a useful summary of it for the article.  121a0012 (talk) 02:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

text: A search for the terms "false claims act" "supreme court" also brings up a number of relevant pages.  121a0012 (talk) 02:39, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added some text to reference a new article about the Allison Engine case, which is essential background for S.386.  121a0012 (talk) 05:04, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: 2009 amendments

message: just making a note for me later, or for someone else.  first article in this. Jytdog (talk) 00:44, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  useful source
Talk:Fat Man

message: The article may or may not correctly describe the core as a "sphere". It's certainly possible that the Pu was formed into a solid sphere, and only reached "critical mass" (density) with the shaped charges. In fact the article discusses that a bit. However, a lot of (sloppy) discussion about spherical shells describe them as "spheres". (Of course, a beach ball is (approximately) a sphere of plastic and air. But it's not a plastic sphere!) What I'd like to see here is that if the editor means solid sphere s/he say that, and if the meaning is spherical shell, then it should be pretty clear that that term needs to be used. I'm now not certain that my understanding of the Fat Boy core (a spherical shell compressed by the detonation of many shape charges) is correct. In other words, this article leaves me more confused that before I read it. That's not good.174.130.71.156 (talk) 07:42, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: You'll get quite a bit of detail from this description of the core, written by data engineer (non-physicist) Carey Sublette. Scroll down to 8.1.1.1 The Pit Assembly. Sublette describes a plutonium-gallium alloy formed into a mostly solid sphere but with a small cavity at the center, holding a two-piece neutron initiator. The word "hollow" doesn't work here because it gives a sense of having a relatively thin shell, but the core was thick. Binksternet (talk) 09:48, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sphere 

message: At the bottom of the color key in the Assembly section is a note that indicates the uranium tamper contributed up to 20 percent of the weapon's final yield.  A paragraph following then seems to contradict this saying the uranium tamper contributed 30 percent.  Is this a misread on my part, a broad approximation, or something else?  Each seems to cite a difference source.  Even if I misread it still seems confusing.  Maybe this could be generalized into "20-30%" kind of compromise? StrontiumDogs (talk) 22:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked both sources in case it was a typo. Both are correctly cited. But Wellerstein cites a more recent and comprehensive source, so used the 30% figure. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:54, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assembly section contradiction?
Talk:McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle

message: Is there nothing published about the F-15 avionics, or is it classified ? Compare with F-14 CADC with recently unclassified description of MP944 chips involved. - Rod57 (talk) 22:07, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there nothing published about the F-15 avionics 

message: The f15I is missing from the variants list. 176.230.98.161 (talk) 20:33, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: F-15I is based on the F-15E, see McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle#F-15I. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:45, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  F15I 

message: The "Sea Eagle" should be called the "Seagle" or the "Seagull" (this is not a serious topic.) Taffy boeing b 17 (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sea Eagle Stuff
Talk:Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk

message: OK - there are periodic post retirement sightings. When retired - a primary reason was the F-22 able to take over their role. The F22 is either supplemented by (or eventually replaced) by the JSF / F-35. The F22 and F35 are Quite different IRT thier Software. I have heard it stated the F-22 was the largest Software project fully written in the ADA programming language. The F-35 is mostly written in C++; With the LM programming guidelines document for the F35 released to the public and very highly thought of. I am certain the F-117 was a very software intensive project- have NO idea of the what programming language was used for it- or even think of the age of the hardware  (CPU in use then). -Is it still flying using swapped out newer software or CPU- and verifing that? Wfoj3 (talk) 17:58, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Post Retirement Sightings 

message: The following comment should have been added to this talk page, but a GA review page was opened instead (IPs are not allowed to review GANs; I have copied the comment here, since that page will be deleted):
:A retired F-117 pilot stated quite unequivocally that the F-117 was not a fighter, but a bomber ( armament of 2 bombs) and was designated F-117 ( and not B-117) so as not to deter ASAF pilots from  flying the aircraft!! 203.7.123.1 (talk · contribs) 12:43, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: This article has had a Designation section that largely covers this for over 15 years. The Nighthawk is an attack aircraft and too small to be a bomber. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:08, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment from IP who tried to open a GA review
Talk:Fuel cell

message: What I can conclude from the entire reading from Wikipedia about fuel cell?? 61.5.151.51 (talk) 17:46, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This talk page is for discussing improvements to the article, not for the article itself, this is not the place to ask for a summary. See WP:NOTFORUM Graystormmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm 19:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fuel cell 

message: — Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture
Talk:Frederick William I of Prussia

message: Old Fred-Willy really does deserve more then this. Though not the equal of his illustrious son, he was at least the equal of the first king of Prussia or the Great Elector. I'll try to add some stuff.
- CJWilly
: Seriously, this guy's article needs a ton more stuff. I'm not trying to gloss his retarded treatment of Fritz JoshNarins (talk) 16:03, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frederich William 

message: Uhhh, why was this article moved to "Frederick William I in Prussia"? I mean, I know he hang out there and all but shouldn't it be "of"? Volunteer Marek  06:00, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  weird move 

message: This pretty much explains it:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_William_I_of_Prussia  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeathComesSoon (talk • contribs) 14:11, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  king IN Prussia 

message: Perfunctory and incomplete article about one of the more important figures of early modern European history. Much detail about his coffin/sarcophagus but little about his reign. (German WP entry is 10 times as long – 7,000 words – with 14 illustrations.) Sca (talk) 15:19, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Spotty

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Soldier-King and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 7#Soldier-King until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:36, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Soldier-King" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Frederick William, Elector of Brandenburg

message: Is he called the Great Duke (grosse Kurfurst) or the Great Elector or both?  Is this a translation problem? --rmhermen
--------
rmhermen, in German he is called Grosse Kurfuerst, which is Elector prince.
Americans may use duke, but that is the wrong translation. Duke is Herzog in German. He was not Herzog. The Kurfuersten, or electors were the most important positions held in the HRE Holy Roman Empire.
user:H.J.
----
This picture seems excessively large... Tuf-Kat
----
This article is very vague as to what area he actually ruled. Also, I'm guessing from the mention of the Hague that "Estates-General" means Netherlands States-General, but I'm not sure. It deserves clarification by someone who is sure. -- Jmabel 20:03, 5 Jan 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Old talk

message: It is stated, in this article, that Frederick William maries Dorothea in Groningen. Groningen is a city in the Netherlands and if you click on Groningen, you'll be send to the page of that city. But I'm quite sure that this is a mistake. On at least two sites it is stated that he maried her in Gröningen, a place near Halberstadt, Germany. As Halberstadt was one of the possesions of Frederick William and Groningen was not, Gröningen seems more likely to me.
The two sites are: http://www.spsg.de/index.php?id=1164, and http://genealogy.euweb.cz/hohz/hohenz3.html (21.03.2006)
Felis Serval —This unsigned comment was added by Felis.serval (talk • contribs) 21 March 2006.
: Seems pretty likely to me, I will edit accordingly; if someone has reason to think I'm wrong, reverse me but cite your reasons. Thanks, FS. - Jmabel | Talk
: Looks like Olessi (talk • contribs) beat me to it, but didn't remark here. - Jmabel | Talk 05:38, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Groningen vs. Gröningen

message: The following was originally added here.At the outbreak of the Northern Wars, Lithuania put itself under protection by Frederick William and the Swedes. Frederick William was entitled to inherit the grand duchy, due to his direct line to the Jagiellon dynasty. In 1655 the Lithuanians recognized Frederick William as their sovereign. Poland asked for a union with the grand duchy and offered this to Frederick William, if he converted his religion to Roman Catholicism, which he declined. John II Casimir became the King of Poland instead.
I have removed it because it is unsourced and I have not seen the information anywhere else. Olessi 22:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lithuania 

message: I suggest that there should be more about the Great Elector's youth, as there is nothing there at the time. 200.32.243.186 (talk) 18:15, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Great Elector's Youth
Talk:GNU

message: GNU compress look so good on a GUI but for legal reasons had to be renamed.  Another promising packer software name would be gnu Densify.
Let‘s start the Talk.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E0:8F0B:8E39:6514:F376:3E3F:51B7 (talk) 16:26, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  gzip, 7zip, compress registered trade names or trade marks 

message: As well as an extensive collection of software (because that's what operating systems are), the two statements are compatible and true according to usage and citeable literature. This was clear and well-referenced by reliable sources in previous versions of the article, which I argue should be restored to replace this mess. It wouldn't surprise me if this mess turned out to be the work of sponsored editing and anti-GNU evangelizers, because it pretty much lingers on vandalistic lines.
Yes, GNU is an experimental OS, that is, when using GNU's own kernel "Hurd" instead of Linux. That also used to be well-referenced in the article. But an experimental OS is still an OS. If you believe this is wrong, go correct the articles for Darwin, ReactOS, TempleOS, Plan 9, etc; all of which are experimental or never see the production light, serving instead as component providers for other systems (macOS, Inferno). Actually, per Wikipedia's own policies (e.g. Wikipedia:NPOV), all major views on a subject should be proportionally represented on the article, starting from the lead paragraph. Therefore, current versions are a violation of community standards. I think editors like User:Ahunt are smart enough to understand this and come fix their own mistakes. --isacdaavid 18:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: You probably should start by reading WP:AGF and WP:NPA and withdraw your remarks, before you start accusing longstanding editors of being vandals. - Ahunt (talk) 20:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  GNU is an operating system 

message: isnt the full name "GNU's Not Unix" Supa dan 10G (talk) 13:58, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Supa dan 10G No – that's not how hackers work. It's just GNU. Also: recursive acronym – very important. -- dsprc [talk] 21:51, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

text: @Supa dan 10G Also also: please use :WP:REFDESK for generalized discussion and inquiries going forward. Talk pages are for improving articles, and (generally) not for discussing their subjects. -- dsprc [talk] 21:53, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  acronym?
Talk:Greek language

message: What does catastrophic mean? 73.212.16.52 (talk) 02:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Disastrous, ruinous, or pertaining to a catastrophe. 2A02:AB04:2AB:700:4DA:D150:51F7:3110 (talk) 09:11, 19 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catastrophic 

message: There is no mention of the infinitive forms of verbs in Ancient Greek, which were very important as they could be used as nouns, with the singular definite article in the various cases. The form seems to have vanished in Modern Greek. Esedowns (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The Ancient Greek infinitive is mentioned twice in the article, and also its disappearance. –Austronesier (talk) 18:32, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infinitive of verbs 

message: should there be such a section here? 198.161.51.64 (talk) 20:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  etymology of the name "Greek"?