Talk:Prayer Book Rebellion

message: This article had become ridiculously POV - hopefully I've removed the main problems.  Feel free to contradict me, but extend the courtesy of doing so in talk first.  Nylarathotep
Research has also suggested that prior to the rebellion the Cornish language had strengthened and more concessions had been made to Cornwall as a "nation", and that anti-English sentiment had been growing stronger, providing additional impetus for the rebellion.
I would like to see such research with evidence - if not I'll remove. Nylarathotep
This article is truly dreadful. There are plenty of books on the Prayer Book Rebellion, and all of them place the belligerents as mainly Cornish nobility and note that its forces mostly came from Cornish speaking areas. I don't know what your point is in attempting to rewrite history or the purpose the Flag of St George on your main page is all about when describing the Cornish belligerents. Why use this? Have you any evidence that it was flown during the conflict on the Cornish side? Admittedly the evidence is circumstantial that St Piran's Flag was flown by the Cornish side, but then why not say that and refer to the scholarly works that have discussed this? 
If you don't have evidence of the Cross of St George being flown you should remove it from the page.  Seems like the usual Wikipedia double standards: Wikipedians claim POV sentiments by others but never admit to their own national proclivities. This article seems to be claiming authenticity for some 'Southwestern' regional history that never existed - very POV.
If you are interested read: Western Rising (Westcountry Books), Cornwall (Peyton), Cornwall For Ever (School Text Book), and the Cornish Curriculum for Schools (available on line). There are also plenty of articles published by Exeter Uni through the journal Cornish Studies.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.182.88.43 (talk) 22:33, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: All right, what the divvil is this alleged neutrality dispute about? I'm sick of seeing NPOV notices on every article relating to Cornwall. QuartierLatin1968 20:37, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: You too? As there's nothing here that seems terribly NPOV, and the talk page lacks anything relating to it I've removed it for the time being. Tim Rhymeless  (Er...let's shimmy)  09:09, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: old unorganized undated unsigned discussions

message: ...is very confusing and probably contains a grammatical error. Should it mean
"To decades of oppression were added two years of rampant inflation"? Surely the inflation wasn't added to the oppression recently?
Jtownson 14:04, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The sentence "To decades of oppression were recently added two years of rampant inflation"... 

message: Jowwww has undone my edit which removed a large list of external links. If he really wants a debate on this matter lets go through each one of those links and see if he can justify there inclusion. They are meant to contribute something and it clearly states that "Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. " I do not consider the current amount is a minimum, there are far too many. BritishWatcher (talk) 11:13, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think there are too many. I think the list provides some useful further information on the article's subject. --Joowwww (talk) 11:20, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  What information on this article subject does this link provide? http://www.devon.gov.uk/localstudies/114670/1.html BritishWatcher (talk) 11:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  None obviously, it's a dead link. --Joowwww (talk) 11:31, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  external links 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Book of common prayer 1549.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Hi, I've added a couple of the causes mentioned, and I'll get the rest done later, but would it be better to change the causes subheading to background? The subheading is starting to sound a bit essay-ish, and I've noticed similar rebellions, eg, Kett's, 1497 rebellion, have background as their first subheading, rather than causes. (Also, go easy, I'm new :) ) Eyesfaerie (talk) 23:40, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold! Background also strikes me as better. Moonraker (talk) 02:17, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've updated the article, now, but I've come across a few problems. Firstly, the last paragraph seems to be on how the Sampford Courtenay ended, but it doesn't mention Sampford Courtenay explicitly. Should it be moved to Battle of Sampford Courtenay? Also, there could probably also be a link to Humphrey Arundell, but again, I'm not sure where to put that. Lastly, I haven't found any sources linking economic issues (apart from the tax) discretely to the Prayer Book rebellion, so I'm mostly leaving them out for the time being to avoid confusion with the background to the 1549 rebellions as a whole. Thanks so much for your help! Eyesfaerie (talk) 19:04, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Causes vs background?

message: Substituted at 03:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Prayer Book Rebellion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060304034251/http://www.devon.gov.uk/etched?_IXP_=1&_IXR=114670 to http://www.devon.gov.uk/etched?_IXP_=1&_IXR=114670
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060820010747/http://users.senet.com.au/~dewnans/Western_Rebellion_and_others.html to http://users.senet.com.au/~dewnans/Western_Rebellion_and_others.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051122210531/http://www.bavidge.co.uk/just_cornwall.htm to http://www.bavidge.co.uk/just_cornwall.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified