lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ipswich River Wildlife Sanctuary

message: The gradient of the Ipswich is very low. The river meanders extensively. The length cited if true must be along the centerline. The distance as the crow flies is only a few miles. You can spend all morning canoing through it and walk back to your starting point. The reservation essentially preserves the wetland. It was created out of the Proctor lands. Proctor was a marble baron. The family fortune was based on quarries in Vermont. At one point he had bought much of Ipswich, Topsfield, Hamilton and Wenham. There was an active country society of moneyed person in this area, including Bradley Palmer. They all belonged to Myopia Hunt Club, played golf and polo, and staged phony fox hunts (the fox was cared for until the day of his "release" and demise). It was very pleasurable in this land of lovely waters, and many of these figures were very philanthropic out of patriotism, but about the middle of the 20th century it began to decline. All things come to an end. In 1950 (I believe) it was Proctor's turn to explain himself to his creator. His hill estate and the wetlands were purchased by the Audubon Society to preserve them. The only other competitors wished to fill in the wetlands and develop them. They would not, however, have gotten very far, as not long after, the Wetlands Act was passed. You cannot, in Massachusetts, build within a certain number of feet of wetlands, nor can you fill wetlands. Thus the term "buildable" and "non-buildable" lots came into use. If you were unlucky enough to have non-buildable lots, too bad for you. Every community in Massachusetts has an ecological board from which all construction has to seek approval. It has considerable power, but whether this is enough remains to be seen.
In any case some expansion of this article with proper refs seems warranted. The sanctuary is a significant refuge to the forest and marsh birds, just as Plum Island is to the shore birds. I will try to drop over there and take a few photos.Branigan 08:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Length and history
Talk:Lambert's Cove Beach

message: I don't know how to edit terribly well, but the source needed to cite the claim about reference to beach apartheid can be found here. http://www.mvtimes.com/news/2007/03/01/letters_to_the_editor.php, if anyone can do that. Otherwise, I'll read more about it and get back to it in a few days.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.24.196.122 (talk) 18:37, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of Massachusetts state forests

message: This link seems to list a number of state forests that have not been included anywhere: e.g. Northfield, Otis, Peru. OldPine (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I added them. It seems that the state forests listed under the DCR's "Find a park" directory are only those they either 1)consider worth promoting or 2)have facilities able to handle visitors. Other forests are found in their various documents such as that above, and even indicate they are available for activities such as snowmobiling. OldPine (talk) 15:50, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing State Forests?

message: Should this page be merged with and redirected to MA state parks page?  Forests and parks in MA are administered the same way by the same organization,  and many are already listed on that page. GriffinWrigglesworth (talk) 21:48, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with state parks?
Talk:Royal Canadian Army Veterinary Corps

message: These two pages cover the same topic and should be combined. --Sophitessa (talk) 07:04, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: I went ahead and merged the pages. See box above for pages and diffs. I did for the most part a straight cut and paste of all text with only few minor edits. Information still needs reliable references and more history added. In addition confusion about the various names should be cleared up, i.e. Royal Canadian Army Veterinary Corps vs. Canadian Army Veterinary Service. --Sophitessa (talk) 21:20, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged
Talk:Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales

message: Move, uncontroversial. Parsecboy (talk) 13:19, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: I have removed the cut-and-paste version derived from this page. The resulting stub is more grammatical, and much more encyclopedic. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:48, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio
Talk:Abduction of Rahma el-Dennaoui

message: I'm concerned that some of this article is copyright infringement; at least two paragraphs seem lifted directly from here, and I'm not sure the article can stand on its own without them.  I'm referring to the first and fourth paragraphs, as the article is currently written. --Darkwind (talk) 00:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, the easy solution is to rewrite the article, so that's what I'm doing. --Darkwind (talk) 01:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: "Wikipedia is not a missing person finder" is not a valid CSD criterion.  As far as I can tell, this article no longer fits any of the CSD criteria, and I suspect I'd dispute any PROD unless you have a really good PROD reason; so if you really think this article needs to be deleted, before I'm even done with it, then feel free to write up an AfD nom. --Darkwind (talk) 01:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: right, speedy declined by admin. DGG (talk) 03:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: CSD notices
Talk:31 Service Battalion

message: Hello to the editors of this article. I'm A Train, and I've been a Wikipedia editor since 2005. I found this article in a backlog of articles needing attention and I intend to give it just that. This is an important article that definitely should be in the encyclopedia, but it doesn't comply with the Wikipedia Manual of Style at the moment, so I'll be making some big edits. The first thing I'm going to do is move the article to a different name. From my research, I've found that the proper name for this unit is 31 Service Battalion, and moving this article to that name would bring it in line with the naming conventions for other Canadian army units, like 33_Service_Battalion.
I'm a military vet but not a Canadian forces vet, so please holler if I make any mistakes. I'd also really appreciate any sources (books, magazine articles, websites) that we could use to verify the info in this article and add more.
Cheers, A Traintalk 16:13, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Undertaking a cleanup -- starting with a new name
Talk:Run-Away (Super Furry Animals song)

message: The prose is good; I cleaned some things up by combining one-sentence paragraphs. Things like that should simply be combined into one paragraph, despite their possible difference in topic. The only thing keeping this from being passed is the "citation needed" tag in the first sentence. Please source the statement. NSR77 TC 22:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: GA Nominee - On Hold

message: Something makes me think renault caravelle, but I'm sure thats wrong, sunbeam of some description? 82.22.138.233 (talk) 02:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Passed. NSR77 TC 22:52, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Car - What is it?
Talk:HNoMS Nordkapp

message: All that keeps this article out of B-class is that some of the references cannot be checked. I refer to a couple of WEB sources that seem to have gone out of business. If those references can be changed to something more permanent, I would be pleased to rate it as B. PKKloeppel (talk) 19:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's done. Both deadlink references replaced, one with a book reference, the other with a live website. Manxruler (talk) 22:04, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

text: You have done your part, and now I will do mine. B-class. PKKloeppel (talk) 16:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Make this B-class
Talk:Cultural materialism (anthropology)

message: why is there a NPOV tag on this page if there's no talk about it? Removing it now. Dabomb691 21:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: Hello. I've split the Cultural materialism article into separate articles for the anthropological and literary versions. The original page should be a disambiguation page now. Copying the talk page contents from that into both versions. DionysosProteus 01:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split article

message: While I am normally a proponent of using the right words to describe the right thing, this article strikes me as being the exact opposite of the article it was split from, the Dialectical Materialism.  Where Dialectical materialism is written to exactly the technical requirement of the subject, it seems very strongly that this article could be improved through the use of less technical language to describe the study.  Or perhaps the more technical side of things could be moved to a Technical Discussion section and let less technical discussion of the subject be nearer the top of the page.--Bpmitche (talk) 22:47, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Language 
Talk:Mike O'Hearn

message: This article needs neutral third-party reliable sources.  Corvus cornix 01:10, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: I tagged this for a photo.  I'm looking, but if you find a good one before I do, please let me know talk--Basedgroup (talk) 17:12, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo

message: Original:
O'Hearn is the only individual to be a Gladiator on both the original (1989–1996) (as Thor) and the 2008 series.[2]
Suggestion: 
Delete the sentence and the source which is no longer valid. Michael O’Hearn was not a part of the original American Gladiators. 190.43.229.192 (talk) 17:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done for now: According to this interview https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=k_QIrWWblWY he was indeed Thor on the original show. According to American_Gladiators_(2008_TV_series)#Male_gladiators he was a reserve gladiator on the first series. It might be  a good idea to clarify the wording. Meters (talk) 18:34, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 April 2024
Talk:Merrimac Square

message: Why does the town square need its own article?  Shouldn't this be in the main article for the town?  Anyone object to a merge? Fletcher (talk) 00:38, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I changed my mind, this article doesn't really contribute anything.  We're not the yellow pages and we don't need to give details about where particular buildings are located. Fletcher (talk) 18:29, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It was historically important as one of the first centers of the Industrial Revolution in the United States. --TimothyDexter (talk) 03:56, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Merrimack Canal

message: These articles cover the same topic. I would propose to merge the two. Cheers
:Risk Engineer (talk) 20:44, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge into [[Lowell Power Canal System and Pawtucket Gatehouse]] 
Talk:Tankcsapda

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Lukács László. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 October 23#Lukács László until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Mattplaysthedrums (talk) 06:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Lukács László" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Middletown, Massachusetts

message: Middletown%2c_Massachusetts  has been referenced on multiple occasions by  "Boston_Legal".
Thank You,
 hopiakuta  Please do  sign  your  signature  on your  message.  %7e%7e   Thank You. - 10:50, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ Boston_Legal ]] [[ Middletown%2c_Massachusetts ]]
Talk:Anabaptist Association of Australia and New Zealand

message: The AAANZ is greatly influenced by progressive? mennonite missionaries from(? the mennonite USA denomination with its 'confession of faith in a (progressive?) mennonite perspective')and does not represent all anabaptists, eg conservative, plain, communal - collective etc.
It certainly does not speak for or represent all anabaptists in Australia.
Mennonite USA itself is only a very small part of the Mennonite world.It should be noted that Mennonite USA is JUST a denomination and does not speak for all anabaptists even in north America.
There are already a number of visible anabaptist presense in Australia. The AAANZ is just one of many anabaptist groups in Australia.
Other 'visible presences' of the anabaptist tradition in Australia include:
The Mennonite Church of Hope in Fennel Bay
The Australian Christian Brotherhood in Queensland
The Community at Rocky Cape, in Tasmania (check the web under 'The Common Life')
The Bruderhof in Inverell , New South Wales.
The Perth Anabaptists (check the web under 'Perth Anabaptist').
How does the aaanz achieve accountability when they are not a congregation?
Also how do they manage to have 'real community' when they are not a church?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.86.174 (talk) 05:45, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I question their membership numbers. Third Way Cafe puts their numbers at 30. I feel that this article needs updating from a reliable, non - AAANZ source.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.111.130.132 (talk) 22:59, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Membership
Talk:Mount Everett

message: I've been working on this article as of June 2023 & added most of its current sources & organization. I've tried to carefully source all content. In any further expansion, please stick to this standard.
35.8.219.114 (talk) 22:42, 5 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Added a dozen++ sources
Talk:Cultural materialism (cultural studies)

message: why is there a NPOV tag on this page if there's no talk about it? Removing it now. Dabomb691 21:07, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV?

message: Hello. I've split the Cultural materialism article into separate articles for the anthropological and literary versions. The original page should be a disambiguation page now. Copying the talk page contents from that into both versions. I tried to give this one a good edit before splitting, but it still needs really serious work. DionysosProteus 01:17, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split article

message: I suggest this site to expand resource material 
http://www.allaboutphilosophy.org/cultural-materialism.htm
--AntiMarxist (talk) 23:47, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I suggest you review WP:RS. Jayjg (talk) 01:30, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs Work
Talk:Newton Highlands, Massachusetts

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the Category:Massachusetts stub on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the  above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.— Preceding unsigned comment added by SkiersBot (talk • contribs) 19:17, October 28, 2007 (UTC)
:::Stub seems appropriate right now.–CaroleHenson (talk) 00:07, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot message, regarding stub status
Talk:Nixes Mate

message: The island is really a shoal-- I've never seen more of it than barely awash at low water. The article conflates the island  with the daybeacon, which is the subject of the NRHP listing.  It might be better if the article were moved to "Nix's Mate Daybeacon", which is the NRHP name, since the NRHP listing is the only reason the shoal is notable enough to have a WP article.
The 1834 date is the one provided by NRIS and our usual practice is to use those facts in the NRHP infobox.  Rowlett says 1805, which may be a better date, but unless we can find a good cite, I'm inclined to stick with NRIS. . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to me • contribs)  23:47, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I added a footnote with the other date, so both are now covered. If better sources are found this can be further clarified. --Muhandes (talk) 06:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Dublin Rams

message: This edit needs fact-checking. Might not be accurate. - TheMagnificentist 08:06, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of edit needed
Talk:Daniel Clark

message: What about Dan Clark, the football player/motivational author?  His 1983 book Getting High:  How To Really Do It made a huge difference in my life, inspiring me to stay in school (School is Kool!) stay off drugs (a drug user is no better than a cow) and live a life that means Going For It and Making A Difference!!!--63.25.228.37 01:25, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Daniel Clark was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 17:38, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:High Standard HDM

message: The article seems to contradict itself, or maybe I'm confused :|
:"This pistol design was originally delivered on the 20th of January 1944..."
but...
:"In service 	1942 to Current"
Just confused as to what is correct...
--41.133.242.5 (talk) 20:51, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction 1942 or 1944 

message: If you add the barrel length to the suppressor length the sum is more than the overall length of the pistol. At least one of the three values is wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.164.41.7 (talk) 19:06, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in size 
Talk:David Pearce (Australian soldier)

message: I'll look after the merge to Operation Slipper this weekend if no-one beats me to it.  I just want to fix up the missing refs first.  If someone else feels like moving it in the meantime, then by all means, go for it (but it'd be nice if the main body could be merged largely intact for my reference-searching sanity :)) Mark Chovain 05:06, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Rail ale trail

message: The file :File:Truro Rail Ale Trail 153377 crop.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Truro Rail Ale Trail 153377 crop.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 07:47, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Truro Rail Ale Trail 153377 crop.jpg]]
Talk:South Hamilton, Massachusetts

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the Category:Massachusetts stub on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the  above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.
South Hamilton is not a town.  You will not find it on a directory of towns with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, it is classified by the USGS as a "populated place".  It could be called a neighborhood if it was a distinct area of Hamilton, but it isn't.  It is the postal address for mail delivered from the zip code 01982 post office which the Southern of two post offices in Hamilton.  The 2nd post office was opened before the USPS required zip codes on mail, necessitating a way to distinguish mail going to the new post office.  Its delivery area encompasses all of Hamilton because the original northern post office no longer delivers mail.
Furthermore, all the "Notable Residents" that were on the page before my edits are also listed as "Notable Residents" on the Hamilton page.  All the "Notable Geography" section was also duplicated from the Hamilton page.  There was not one unique piece of information on this page, other than the notable confusion created by USPS addresses that say "South Hamilton" even though no such town exists.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.197.161.108 (talk) 05:27, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Southfield, Massachusetts

message: This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the Category:Massachusetts stub on the article page.
*If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
*If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the  above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article.
There needs to be a differentiation between the Southfield on the South Shore and the Southfield in western Massachusetts. Dory Previn, who died on February 14, 2012, has a link to this page. Erasmussen (talk) 15:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Mauser Model 1871

message: Can somebody please clean it up? And what caliber was the 1871/84?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.38.242 (talk) 04:51, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was the cartridge .43 or .433 in, 11 or 11.15 mm? 
Template talk:Korn

message: I removed the link to this Shane Gibson as the person linked is a member of the Bahamian Parliament. I sincerely doubt he handles matters of policy by day and thrashes by night. spryde | talk 20:21, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shane Gibson (Backup Band) 

message: Here I'll provide some links that label's Korn & Skrillex's "Get Up!" as a Korn single.
*Here is one from Roadrunner Record's official website: http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/news/Korn--Skrillex-At-Coachella-22917.aspx ("Check out fan footage of Skrillex inviting his good friends Korn on stage to perform their new single 'Get Up'")
*Here is an additional one I found, as korn.com is back up: http://modlife.com/korn/news/0/1/16834/get_up_before_its_too_late ("EXTENDED! There are only 24 hours left to get your FREE DOWNLOAD of the new Korn single featuring Skrillex!")
That's my only link for now, as Korn's Modlife site is currently overloaded.  But I will be back if more is needed. 74.32.233.5 (talk) 19:50, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Get Up! single status
Talk:Bukovnya

message: Should be deleted. Inacc8rate. It is not Bukovyna but Bykivnia. The writer made a mistake. Bandurist 01:37, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No need to delete. We can replace this by a redirect since the mistake protruded in some media. But not before any content is merged. --Irpen 01:55, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Mistake
Talk:Julián Acuña Galé

message: Currently this list includes a lot of the same people who are listed at List of botanists by author abbreviation. Would it not be preferable to pare down this list to botanists who have not published taxonomic work that includes the new plant names that cause them to be given an official abbreviation? Personally, I ignore this list, but if it were a list of people who haven't done taxonomic work (plant physiologists, specialists in plant breeding, plant behaviour, etc.), it could be more interesting. Nadiatalent (talk) 21:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redundant lists?
Talk:Angelus Novus

message: Did Miklós Radnóti know this painting and Benjamni’s essay?
„s némán, akár az angyal, ha pusztulást csodál” (Hungarian)
„Silence like an Angel admire a decay” (Razglednicák)
Sándor Tóth, mrgszhonlap@gmail.com  
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.92.171.75 (talk) 11:16, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Muzzle climb

message: Perhaps these two articles should be merged? Perhaps Compensator should also be discussed in the same article? After all, muzzle climb is, to an extent, a result of the same forces as muzzle rise, and compensators are intended to counter these forces.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregorgrigorio (talk • contribs) 12:40, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Muzzle Climb and Rise: merge?