Talk:List of Angel comics

message: I'm trying to find a placing for Dark Horse Extra 25-28: The Nepalese Switcheroo but can't find it anywhere - where does it fit? --80.176.158.128 14:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nepalese Switcheroo

message: IDW has provided Newsarama with a double-shot of Spike. That is, previews of both its upcoming Spike projects, Spike: Old Wounds and Spike vs. Dracula #1 (of 5). Both issues are due in comic shops in February. 
First up, Old Wounds by Scott Tipton and Ferdando Goni. The solicitation for the special reads: 
Is Spike’s past coming back to haunt him? When a retired L.A. detective accuses Spike of a decades-old murder, the former William the Bloody finds himself on the run and forced to try to solve the most infamous unsolved crime in Los Angeles history. Where will he turn for help? What was Spike up to in 1947? And what do those monster-slaying luchadores Los Hermanos Numeros have to do with it? It’s all-out action in the City of Angels! Written by Scott Tipton (Doomed) with art by Fernando Goni (Spike: Old Times). 48 pages.
And next, Spike vs. Dracula #1 by Peter David and Joe Corroney. The solicitation reads: 
Presenting the first chapter of a five-part Spike saga spanning centuries! A hundred and twenty years ago, a tribe of gypsies inflicted a terrible curse upon the vampire known as Angelus... a curse that brought a terrible vengeance upon the tribe in the form of Angelus's family: Darla, Drusilla, and most notably, William the Bloody, a.k.a. "Spike." But the gypsy clan has a dark and powerful supporter: Count Dracula. Outraged over the slaughter of the gypsies, Dracula seeks revenge upon the three vampires... and thus begins a rivalry between Spike and Dracula that will cover decades. A rivalry steeped in blood... honor... and eleven quid. Corroney will also provide covers for all five issues, as will variant cover artists Zach Howard, Sean Murphy, and Eric Wight.
Source: http://www.newsarama.com/IDW/Spike/Previews/SpikeDoublePreview.htm Lil Flip246 03:12, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Newish comics

message: 'Ello lads. It seems this article isn't really fulfilling its purpose. After all, not every single comic deserves an article. You can ask the guys over the comics Wikiproject about that. Thing is, although notability is not an official guideline, it IS policy that we don't overdo it with the summaries and that we don't dedicate entire articles to single issues. As such, there are the "List of..." articles. This also means that the appropriate articles will be redirected to this page, and we can probably ditch the Angel comics template. Before anyone rashly reverts the page after I'm done with, please defend your stance first (under the comments section). Thank you. Kusonaga 22:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't so much call it rash. These articles haven't been edited in months most of the time. Why would you collect all of the Spike one-shots, when you can just put all of the Spike one-shots here? That is the purpose of the article. Now, nothing I've done can't be reverted in a few minutes. You just go back a day in all the articles, but there is no good reason to let these articles exist. Extensive plot summaries are discouraged, and the rest of the article has the same info on the page (issues about canon). As you can see, I've put the essence of all the articles on this page, in just one or two paragraphs. Not every issue deserves an article, and not every issue needs every cover put alongside it (or any cover at all). Kusonaga 07:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

text: EDIT: Also, the articles devoted to comic arcs were often copyvios (we don't get to copy the information from the Dark Horse page). Kusonaga 07:51, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with you on the plot summaries being too much (ironic, since I wrote more than a few of them), but I've also tried to include information on the creative process whenever such info has been available, particularly the comics written by Peter David as he maintains a fairly strong web presence. I've added links to the main articles of a few of the comics, which can be easily be removed if said articles are eventually deleted. It might be wise to bring the rest of the Wikiproject into this discussion.--Jeff-El 03:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I get that, but take for example, the one-shots. They don't actually have anything about the creative process. It's all just one big plot summary with a statement about continuity attached to them. It's why I haven't added Spike vs Dracula to the article yet, since I'm not sure how to work it in, but the other comics... well, haven't actually seen anything that I really missed, and really, one-shots shouldn't get their own pages unless they're something culturally import like Batman: The Killing Joke. Lord knows the "Masks" one-shot page is just a haven for a lot of preview images that can't be possibly be defended as fair-use. Kusonaga 04:11, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed. Kusonaga 13:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major clean-up about to come into effect 

message: I agree some work could be done. But is it not rash to undo months of work without a proper discussion with the Buffyverse WikiPro to test consensus. E.g. if it is not acceptable to devote an article to a single issue - There are other solutions which would allow work to be preserved e.g. various merges such as putting together the Spike one-shots (which were later collected in a TPB), and merging all the "Spotlight" issues (again which were combined into a TPB later... -- Paxomen 07:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't so much call it rash. These articles haven't been edited in months most of the time. Why would you collect all of the Spike one-shots, when you can just put all of the Spike one-shots here? That is the purpose of the article. Now, nothing I've done can't be reverted in a few minutes. You just go back a day in all the articles, but there is no good reason to let these articles exist. Extensive plot summaries are discouraged, and the rest of the article has the same info on the page (issues about canon). As you can see, I've put the essence of all the articles on this page, in just one or two paragraphs. Not every issue deserves an article, and not every issue needs every cover put alongside it (or any cover at all). Kusonaga 07:50, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

text: EDIT: Also, the articles devoted to comic arcs were often copyvios (we don't get to copy the information from the Dark Horse page). Kusonaga 07:51, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with you on the plot summaries being too much (ironic, since I wrote more than a few of them), but I've also tried to include information on the creative process whenever such info has been available, particularly the comics written by Peter David as he maintains a fairly strong web presence. I've added links to the main articles of a few of the comics, which can be easily be removed if said articles are eventually deleted. It might be wise to bring the rest of the Wikiproject into this discussion.--Jeff-El 03:08, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I get that, but take for example, the one-shots. They don't actually have anything about the creative process. It's all just one big plot summary with a statement about continuity attached to them. It's why I haven't added Spike vs Dracula to the article yet, since I'm not sure how to work it in, but the other comics... well, haven't actually seen anything that I really missed, and really, one-shots shouldn't get their own pages unless they're something culturally import like Batman: The Killing Joke. Lord knows the "Masks" one-shot page is just a haven for a lot of preview images that can't be possibly be defended as fair-use. Kusonaga 04:11, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

text: Agreed. Kusonaga 13:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: :Image:Earthly Possessions (Angel Comic).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Earthly Possessions (Angel Comic).jpg

message: :Image:Long Night's Journey (Angel Comic).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Long Night's Journey (Angel Comic).jpg

message: :Image:The Curse (Angel Comic).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:The Curse (Angel Comic).jpg

message: :Image:Angel-series vol 1 (Dark Horse Comics)-01.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Angel-series vol 1 (Dark Horse Comics)-01.jpg

message: :Image:Old Friends (Angel Comic).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 14:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Old Friends (Angel Comic).jpg

message: This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject.  If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class.  The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject.  Comics-awb (talk) 16:58, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

message: I've fixed 30 or 40 pages with similar problems, and IMO my inability to eliminate the error message suggests that  does not properly process the parameter italic title = no, by suppressing that template's invocation of . I'm moving the actually appropriate  magic word directive to the end of the page (where some users will escape being annoyed by it), as a harm-reduction measure: unless someone else can eliminate the error message, while preserving the top-of-page title formatting
:List of Angel comics
this is for now the best that can be achieved.--Jerzy•t 01:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've fixed . There's no error now :) --Nullzero (talk) 01:34, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error msg