Talk:Porsche Panamera

message: Is it competing against the Continental GT or the Continental Flying Spur ? Hektor 19:30, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Which Continental?

message: This sentence is incredibly vague:
"On the 2009 calendar, the Panamera turbo can be seen on the September page."
What 2009 calandar? The 2009 Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Calendar? 2009 Playboy Calendar? The 2009 NFL Calendar? Whoever added that sentence needs to specify who's (what publisher) calendar they are speaking of. Otherwise the sentence makes no sense and should be deleted.
--Patriotic dissent (talk) 08:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Calendar

message: It seems that the article is in general biased against the appearance of the Panamera. This stems in part from the ugliness of the test mule that was seen months before the release of official Panamera pictures. However, now that official pictures have been released, and that some journalists have already seen the car in person (and found it to be not as ugly as initially thought... just different and controversial), I think that this article should:
*Cut back on talking about the ugliness of the test mule
*Remove information on artists impressions and speculation on how the car might look
*Adopt a more objective tone when talking about the car's appearance.
*Update the information in general.
*Maybe add its so ugly it makes me sick to look at for a long time
Oh and by the way, it seems that the Lamborghini Estoque isn't going into production so the sentence claiming that the Panamera is going to compete with the Estoque should be removed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.6.232.179 (talk) 03:15, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Biased and outdated

message: "Porsche will keep production rate at around 20,000 cars per year." What does that mean? Will they scrap those cars that they cannot sell of the 20000? Or do they seriously expect to get more than 20000 orders per year, for a car starting at about 100000 Euro? That would effectively double (?) the market segment of high-price luxury saloons. Maybe the statement should be redrafted. Thyl Engelhardt 213.70.217.172 (talk) 11:26, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Weird wording

message: Aren't the offerings different in the US market? I.E. No V6, PDK standard, manual not available? Bcworkz (talk) 18:32, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: US Market

message: The article states Panamera is a sedan/saloon. Isn't it a hatchback? North wiki (talk) 06:54, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: As noted at Talk:Porsche, it should be identified in the article as it is in the references, i.e., sedan. Alanraywiki (talk) 04:06, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it a sedan or a hatchback? 

message: I nominate that this article be moved to Porsche Panamera Gran Turismo as it is the car's full name. In fact Porsche calls it as such in their promotion. -Red marquis (talk) 09:19, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't agree with this move. We should stick with the common name which is just Porsche Panamera. Just downloaded the brochure from here and it makes no mention of this name. By the way you didn't nominate the move you just went ahead and did it. Bjmullan (talk) 12:48, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved the article back to the original title, pending consensus. GoldDragon (talk) 14:56, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Most detailed video tour of the car: here 124.149.112.100 (talk) 04:47, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  In depth tour

message: Panameras compare to bigger pants, while Daewoos compare to pajamas and very small clothes you grew out of.
70.135.110.135 (talk) 00:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Try loosening the pajama pants tied around your neck; they seem to be constricting bloodflow to your brain.  Mr.choppers | ✎  00:10, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lexus is not Daewoo, so it does belong on the list! 

message: Porsche considered a sedan in the 60s or early 70s. Didn't a Porsche executive build his own? Would this be something to feature in this article? I think it would fit great. --RThompson82 (talk) 00:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a section and image at the Porsche 928 article about the four-door Study H50 based on the 928 (it's towards the bottom of the article.) 72Dino (talk) 00:35, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I meant an earlier model, its a 911-derived car, as I recall. Anyone remember that? --67.171.164.195 (talk) 04:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Earlier Porsche sedan(s)?

message: I have removed the sentence on the "Taxamera" as this isn't an official Porsche model or even acknowledged by Porsche, and the reference just appears to point to an auto blog commenting on a Panamera being used as a taxi. Buyoof (talk) 17:13, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publicity - Taxamera 

message: The background coloring of the engine specs for each generation is very distracting, biased, and childish. Please, go ahead and add different colored backgrounds to all of Wikipedia. 
Also that 2014 fuel cost chart is pretty dumb, but funny. Because nothing says going green like a giant hole in the ground, toxic water from lithium run off, toxic heavy metals leaking from solar panels, and wind turbine blades being recycled by burning to produce energy. Sorry, went into a rant. 
Point, dump the colored backgrounds on the engine specs. I'll never check this, so there is no point in a reply about my rant. 73.228.222.112 (talk) 08:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Engine background colors