Talk:Homi J. Bhabha

message: I have improved the article quite a bit, but this article needs to be significantly expanded to give a true picture of him. In particular, details of how he established other institutions (BARC was originally a heavy water manufacturing facility, designed and built under his guidance; this and many other facts are there which I haven't yet included). If anyone familiar with him or his achievements reads this, please contribute to the article.Pratik.mallya (talk) 17:15, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I've expanded the sections in the article quite a bit! I believe it's ready to be nominated for good article status now. Ishan Mukherjee (talk) 14:45, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: nominated. Ishan Mukherjee (talk) 21:00, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expand Sections  

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:26, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Bhabha .jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:45, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Bhabha And Nehru.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.tifr.res.in/~hbbccc/download/dlal.pdf. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:29, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Homi J. Bhabha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6U68ulwpb?url=http://mha.nic.in/sites/upload_files/mha/files/LST-PDAWD-2013.pdf to http://mha.nic.in/sites/upload_files/mha/files/LST-PDAWD-2013.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:53, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Homi J. Bhabha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://mha.nic.in/sites/upload_files/mha/files/LST-PDAWD-2013.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721162105/http://www.vigyanprasar.gov.in/scientists/bhabha/BHABHANEW.HTM to http://www.vigyanprasar.gov.in/scientists/bhabha/BHABHANEW.HTM
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:38, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Homi J. Bhabha. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130522140825/http://www.igcar.ernet.in/press_releases/press29.htm to http://www.igcar.ernet.in/press_releases/press29.htm
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140420001231/http://www.openthemagazine.com/shorts/smallworld/2014-04-26 to http://www.openthemagazine.com/shorts/smallworld/2014-04-26
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: "During this time, nuclear physics was attracting the greatest minds and it was one of the most significantly emerging fields as compared to theoretical physics, the opposition towards theoretical physics attacked the field because it was lenient towards theories rather than proving natural phenomenon through experiments." - Really? Needs at least a reference but more likely a deletion in view of the sentence's presumptive and speculative nature.Gaussgauss (talk) 02:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Couldn't find a reference for this claim, and might be giving undue weight to a POV, so I've removed it. Ishan Mukherjee (talk) 14:47, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Choice of focus of his scientific studies 

message: What was the name of Dr Homi Jahangir bhabha's father? 2409:4041:2E1E:767C:2007:5E27:5B0E:332C (talk) 07:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: "His father was Jehangir Hormusji Bhabha, a well known Parsi lawyer." -- It is there in the article. Also, if you have future questions, Wikipedia:Reference desk might be the better place to ask as article talk pages are for discussions to improve the article and questions left here may not be seen. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 12:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gujarati 

message: I'm removing the bolded sentence from the section on Bhabha's death, "...Douglas wrote that Crowley said that a bomb in the cargo section of the plane exploded mid-air, bringing down the commercial Boeing 707 airliner in Alps with few traces, saying: "We could have blown it up over Vienna but we decided the high mountains were much better for the bits and pieces to come down on". The Indian media proceeded to report on these claims largely unquestioned."
First, the bolded claim seems simply false. A quick Google search for "Bhabha assassination conspiracy" brings up several news articles that, while discussing the Douglas book, mention that it's only a conspiracy theory. See these Print and Statesman articles for example.
Second, and more important, this claim strikes me as WP:NOR. To quote Wikipedia's article, original research "includes any analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not stated by the sources. To demonstrate that you are not adding original research, you must be able to cite reliable, published sources that are directly related to the topic of the article and directly support the material being presented." Unless a scholarly article is found which could be used to cite the claim that Indian reporting of the Douglas theory has been unquestioning, the claim shouldn't be included. Even if such an article is found, and if a decision is taken to include the claim, it should only be added as "[some author] has found that Indian reporting has been unquestioning".
Note that on the balance, I personally find the conspiracy theory unlikely. I imagine many editors of this article would, too. Of course, though, that's no reason to allow the inclusion of original research.
I've also added some evidence that theorists use to support the conspiracy from the Statesman article linked above. Ishan Mukherjee (talk) 14:58, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for improving the article the way you are currently doing. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 18:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reporting on assassination claims 

message: @Ishan Mukherjee: Hi, would you like to work on the shortcomings raised in GA Review? I have fixed the image issue, but don't know much about the rest. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 20:09, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA review result