lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Saoi

message: I added references and additional info, therefore I removed the stub and cite references tags. Hopefully this suffices and everyone agrees the article is better. Let me know if you feel more needs to be done. Keithh (talk) 18:00, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I am not convinced John McGahern was a Saoi. 
;Evidence for:
* Aosdána "Former members" page lists his name  with the torc icon indicating a Saoi
;Evidence against:
* Aosdána biography does not mention
* I checked all the Arts Council annual reports ( available here and here) and AFAIK the election of every new Saoi is noted in the relevant year; but McGahern is not noted.  The 2004 Aosdána report does not lists McGahern as a Saoi: "There are never more than five Saoithe at any one time. In 2004 they were Louis le Brocquy, Anthony Cronin, Seamus Heaney and Benedict Kiely. " The 2006 Arts Council report notes his death but doesn't mention Aosdána at all. The 2005  Arts Council report says there was a separate Aosdána report for 2005, which I can't find online. It's just possible McGahern was elected Saoi that year. But I would expect some google news archive hits for such an event. jnestorius(talk) 18:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: John McGahern

message: The Arts Council Annual Reports ( available here and here) give the year of election and/or investiture of new Saoithe; sometimes these are a year earlier or later than those given in the Wikipedia page. I surmise that sometimes someone is elected one year and not invested till the following year, and that third-party sources may conflate the two events. The article should specify which date is given for each name; ideally listing both where different. jnestorius(talk) 18:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of election and investiture
Talk:D. P. Singh

message: I removed the contact EMAIL address out of concern for the address and sent a message to that address indicating same.  I will restore it if the owner wishes or put a (protected) contact method up instead.  --KNHaw (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed EMAIL address out of concern for unsolictied EMAIL to addressee 

message: Weak delete. The original text, as I said back in August, was moved here to its own article after removing it from the "Indian science fiction writers" catgeory page where a contributor, almost certainly Dr. D. P. Singh himself, had mistakenly added it. I make no assertions as to his notability. If somebody can make a case (with references!) for keeping this article, then it should stay but otherwise it's a goner. - Dravecky 06:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed deletion
Template talk:Gewandhausorchester conductors

message: I changed the title of the template from "Gewandhausorchester Leipzig Kapellmeisters" to "Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra Kapellmeisters", but for some reason it was reverted by Emerson7.
The Wikipedia article on the orchestra is called Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra and so I think the titles should be unified. There is also a similar template with the title Czech Philharmonic Chief Conductors, not "Šéfdirigenti České filharmonie". Also the Template: Tonkünstlerorchester conductors uses the title "Tonkünstler Orchestra Principal Conductors". Jan.Kamenicek 10:32, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Abdel Rahman El Bacha

message: i've removed the notability tag. after reading around about the guy i'm satisfied he's notable enough to have an article. i've tried to include some of the reasons why in it. i don't know how best to include the references so i left links to the pages i got the information from at the bottom (under 'references'). they're all biographies, and one or two of them have borrowed content from each other, so it might be best to add "according to [website], el bacha performed the entire piano works of chopin by heart' over 6 days". OK THANKS KZF (talk • contribs) 10:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability
Talk:Index of epistemology articles

message: - Rieko was removed in that there was no correlation found in the article that had any relationship whatsoever to epistemological concepts.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.188.175.199 (talk) 20:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Entries 

message: Wikipedia already has an method for categorizing articles and automatically creating indexes to such articles: see Wikipedia:Categorization.
Instead of keeping this index article up-to-date, all one has to do is add Category:Epistemology to the end of all epistomological articles, and viola, that article will soon be automatically indexed in the automatically created article :Category:Epistemology. Teemu Leisti (talk) 17:47, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the point of this article?
Talk:List of Grand Slam boys' singles champions

message: There reads: At least 5 former ITF Junior World Champions have gone on to be Wimbledon finalists.
Well, who are the "ITF Junior World Champions"? The only mention of that title is that last sentence of the article. Most likely all players who won two Slams in a year, qualify. But there are also 21 years with four different Slam winners. And why Wimbledon is pointed out? Sure, it is the most appreciated of the Grand Slams, but still it is only one of total four. 212.50.203.198 (talk) 20:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  junior world champions? 

message: Two points: (1) either an explanation for the bolding of certain names needs to be provided (presumably it indicates future men's GS champions), or the bolding needs to be removed, and (2) this table would be improved by the addition of (#/total) parentheticals at least for the boys who won more than a single title, like what is done in the men's and women's articles. LacrimosaDiesIlla (talk) 18:23, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table Improvements
Talk:Maha Yuga

message: There are lot of discussions around this topic. Kindly wait until I cite them.BalanceΩrestored Talk 11:40, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are http://books.google.com/books?q=%22Maha+Yuga%22&btnG=Search+Books 290 entries for this term at google books. BalanceΩrestored Talk 11:46, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And over 900 entries at http://www.google.com/search?tab=pw&q=%22Maha%20Yuga%22 google web search. BalanceΩrestored Talk 11:47, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Maha Yuga
Talk:BTK

message: When I hear " b. t. k. ", I am most likely to think " burger the king ", " Burger The King ", " Burger King ", " whopper ", " Whopper ". dong!!!
Thank You,
[[ hopiakuta  | [[  %c2%a1   %c2%bf   %7e%7e   %7e%7e  -]] 11:50, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[ bk ]] [[ b. k. ]] 

message: Seeing as how they are "media references" CommonBuckeye 17:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move song refs to Dennis Rader page?
Talk:Honda Dualnote

message: This needs a picture!
Pb8bije6a7b6a3w (talk) 16:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  pic 
Talk:Hustler (car)

message: There's a minicar in Japan by Suzuki also called "Hustler". It seems to be new as of model year 2013.
* Home page in Japanese: http://www.suzuki.co.jp/car/hustler/
* Japanese Wikipedia page: ja:スズキ・ハスラー
— Hippietrail (talk) 15:18, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suzuki also has a car named "Hustler"
Talk:Nissan Rogue

message: Did Nissan buy the nameplate trademark from AMC, or did they give it to them for free?
Nospamtodd (talk) 03:01, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Rogue Nameplate

message: The statement here that the Rogue/Qashqai is built off the Sentra platform is wrong.  As noted on the Qashqai page, it was a fresh "clean-sheet" design -  all the automotive press articles seem to have made the same mistake.Scunnerous (talk) 07:56, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qashqai/Rogue Design 

message: Why is it necessary to maintain separate Rogue and Qashqai/Dualis pages? I mean, they're not just related, they're the same car. Since Qashqai is the original, Rogue should simply be a redirect. 118.208.150.121 (talk) 06:15, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agree, tagged both articles and begun formal discussion here  Splateagle (talk) 11:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

text: They are not the same car.  There is enough unique information about the Rogue to warrant a separate article, and merging them will cause confusion and suggest that the Rogue is inherently less important in comparison.  I sense some regional bias. --Vossanova o< 20:36, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Vossanova is right.  Given the lack of support for the merge I've removed the merge proposal template. 72.244.206.114 (talk) 07:04, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge? 

message: I believe the Renault Koleos has to be added as Related Vehicle.
Also, if the pages of the Qashqai and Dualis are merged with this, may be the page for the Koleos should be merged.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.206.91.131 (talk) 15:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renault Koleos 

message: Nope, that's not a Dualis, that's a Murano. 115.64.228.228 (talk) 04:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a Dualis 

message: Can’t one get light leather interior added over charcoal if no grey leather? Gcson01 (talk) 02:51, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red Rogue Sport 

message: I added a section on the KR15DDT investigation but I kinda suck at citation formatting, as the document and page referenced aren't typical "articles", but the links are in there. ```` ZeeFBI (talk) 21:13, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  KR15DDT Investigation
Talk:Daihatsu Materia

message: 0-60 in 10.2... what? minutes? And a top speed of "106" km/h or mph? 82.153.230.138 (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Times, Speeds 

message: The Toyota bB, Scion xB, Subaru Dex and Daihatsu Materia are all based on the same basic platform. Should these be regarded as variants of the same car (ie list them in the 'aka' field in the infobox) or as merely close relatives (ie list them in the 'related' field in the infobox)? Please answer at Talk:Toyota bB#related vs aka, not here.  Stepho  talk  04:26, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  related vs aka
Talk:Lullington, Somerset

message: In this article: “The parish includes the hamlet of Laverton, where the Church of St Mary dates from the 11th century.” In England, a hamlet is specifically a village that has no church. Laverton, like the settlement of Lullington in the same parish, is a village. AndyKnott009 (talk) 18:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Laverton is not a hamlet
Talk:Kia Kue

message: Hello! I removed the "needs update" flag from this page; it is the first time I have removed a flag from a page, so please let me know if there are any issues. I will be performing additional edits to resolve the page's lack of citations, and will note here when that flag is removed. Thank you!Followscreeks (talk) 19:52, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Flag removed
Talk:Lada 110

message: Lada 111 and Lada 112 should absolutely be merged into Lada 110, which should be the main article. The only differences are in bodywork, the different names just being a result of the old Soviet automotive nomenclature system.  Mr.choppers | ✎  18:11, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge for the same reasons. --Degen Earthfast (talk) 15:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Bullaun

message: I have added a number of extra references and removed the tag. It would be MUCH more helpful if the person who added the tag would say which parts of the article concerned needed further references.Rosser 12:15, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a few academic papers on the subject, do a search on google scholar, they're certainly more "reliable sources" than megalithomania. --Peta 14:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Lullington, East Sussex

message: In accordance with  the Wikipedia notes on writing about settlements, one of the recommendations is that, in order to reduce the number of stubs, villages and other settlements within a civil parish should be in one article. Hence the proposal to merge with Cuckmere Valley Peter Shearan (talk) 10:26, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Hyundai i30

message: this artical could do with a bit more about its green credentials, as that's what's making it big in Australia (not as many green cars in oz as in europe).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hypo Mix (talk • contribs) 05:50, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  green 
Talk:Mental event

message: The Mental Event article needs alot of work. It needs more information and serveral references to go along with the imformation. Also, good image descriptions would be good to have as visual. --Mimilicioussss (talk) 07:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychology 101 Reviewer 

message: There is plenty of debate around the idea that computers do or could instantiate mind so asserting that a computer decides is speculation. I would say all it's doing is symbolic processing, bit values are changing but there is no mental activity at all. Others would say that all the brain does is symbolic processing and so a suitably programmed computer would have mental events...Richwil (talk) 17:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Computation and mind 

message: Considering that there are only four sources listed and that most of them are over 15 years old, there’s a good chance that there is more to be said about this subject. This article is off to a great start but lacks substance. Kwhit24 (talk) 17:00, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cognitive Psychology Reviewer 

message: There is a lot of potential in this article about mental events. It would do the article well to have a visual image to help add some substance. This visual image could represent one of the examples that is listed in the article. One of the examples at the end listed a killer whale. Perhaps a picture of a killer whale could be used.
Marenaw (talk) 06:00, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cognition Student
Talk:K131 Jeep

message: Well, what is the manufacturer of this KM131 ? 79.116.114.121 (talk) 17:50, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: KM131 Jeep

message: Is this really called a "KM131 Jeep?" Or is it a matter of how a lot of people refer to all sport utility vehicles as a Jeep? Maybe due to it having a similar appearance to a jeep wrangler TJ or a CJ. Considering Jeep is a brand and not a type of vehicle it doesn't seem correct since this made by Kia, but i can't find much information on the vehicle. To me it seems like this would be no different than calling it a KM131 Ford.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.89.102.240 (talk) 03:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Mercedes-Benz OM603 engine

message: Isn't Mercedes-Benz_OM603_engine a better place for this article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chewie swe (talk • contribs) 11:16, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Mercedes-Benz_OM603_engine? 

message: This entire article hardly recognises the naturally-aspirated OM603 used in Europe and elsewhere.  These suffer few of the problems that seem to be experienced in the US, descriptions of which seem to comprise the bulk of this article.
To promote a more balanced POV, should the article not consider more the non-turbo versions and their remarkable longevity alongside the turbocharged US models that seem to have so many problems?
I would start a section on the non-turbo versions, but couldn't see a neat way of doing this without trampling all over discussion of trap oxiders, about which I know very little.
Juux (talk) 16:54, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skewed to US OM603? 

message: There isn't really an OM60x series, as the OM601/602/603 and OM604/605/606 are completely different engines (the former being SOHC 2V/cyl and the latter DOHC 4V/cyl).  Each engine should probably have its own article, as with the OM604/605/606, especially since there is very little information relevant to the engine family that isn't specific to a single engine. 
Okto8 (talk) 09:10, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Needs to be split/re-titled
Talk:Mercedes-Benz Vito

message: What means two-stage turbo? OM651 has only one turbocharger* Tsikhotskyi19 (talk) 06:40, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  OM651 

message: Where is the v-class car is made 2A03:2880:20FF:A:0:0:FACE:B00C (talk) 20:25, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  V-class
Talk:Ford Falcon (XC)

message: I've cut the following text from the above main Falcon article, because so much detail on just 13 cars doesn't really belong in an general article covering all 56 years and 3 million plus cars of the Australian Falcon model run. The information would be better placed in this article, but appears to at least partially conflict with a summary already on this page about a special build of 12 GS Falcons in the Limited Edition Model section of the XC Falcon page. No references have been cited for either the following text, or the text on the current page, which makes it hard to try and determine the veracity of either set of details. 203.221.111.117 (talk) 07:48, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detailed info on special GS Falcons cut from the main [[Ford Falcon (Australia)]] article 

message: Adding details of the XC½ update would be nice. I think changes included the return of the 'Blue Oval' Ford badge replacing discrete letters (apparently requested by Edsel Ford II on his visit although the rest of the Ford empire made the same change around the same time) and some suspension revisions to counter Holden's RTS with the HZ introduction. Someone must have the details. 58.108.55.84 (talk) 10:40, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  XC½
Talk:Sun Shipbuilding & Drydock Co.

message: I wrote this article in May for Citizendium. Today I moved it here. Lou Sander 12:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citizendium

message: What should that really say? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:57, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  In one day?
Talk:Thrust2

message: The Blue Flame set the standing start world land speed records for 1 mile (622.407 mi/h) and 1 kilometer (630.388 mi/h) on October 23, 1970. The FIA requirement to set a new standing start world land speed record is to exceed the existing record by 1%. Thrust 2 succeeded in exceeding The Blue Flame's 1 mile record by more than 1% (greater than 628.631). However, although Thrust 2's speed for the 1 kilometer standing start did exceed The Blue Flame's record, it did not exceed it by 1% (636.692 mi/h), and therefore the Thrust 2 kilometer speed was NOT a new world record. Thrust SSC accomplished that feat in 1997. Dick Keller (talk) 18:03, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thrust 2 world record for standing start 1 kilometer is incorrect
Talk:Charles Duncan Michener

message: Shouldn't this article be wikified?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goldencako (talk • contribs) 21:16, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify 

message: Michener was without his knowledge named as the co-author of a fraudulent paper that tried to refute Darwin on the basis of the fossil record.
http://retractionwatch.com/2014/03/24/entomologist-surprised-to-find-name-on-now-retracted-paper-alleging-fossils-oppose-darwins-theory-of-evolution/
Rolf Degen  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.95.230.234 (talk) 09:47, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Victim of fraudulent creationist publication  
Talk:Volvo 66

message: The German Volvo 66 wiki article contains (at 9 Nov 07) the assertion that cars with DAF variomatic transmission could, at least in theory, travel as fast backward as forwards.   I've never heard this before, but I guess there could be a certain ...um ... logic in there somewhere.   Has a DAF expert any insights on this?   If it were true, then it surely would be an interesting fact worthy of the wiki article!   Charles01 21:06, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is, it was used as a feature in the Dutch television show "Ter land ter zee en in de lucht", you might even be able to find this on youtube! 89.100.139.245 12:10, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DAF 66 as Pushmepullyou
Talk:Saab-Lancia 600

message: What is the real name of this car, only Saab 600 or Saab-Lancia 600 as this picture shows http://www.saabnet.com/tsn/misc/images/sl600b.html or did they badge it two ways?  --— Typ932T | C  07:41, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It was Saab-Lancia.  The page should be moved.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.251.84.154 (talk) 09:57, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:SEAT Alhambra

message: I've removed the claim that the MK2 Alhambra is based on VW's new MQB platform. The company has stated that the first model to do so will be the new Audi A3 coming summer 2012. I also removed this claim from the Sharan article. Both of the cars are based on the current Passat platform.  --VMIKEW (talk) 13:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  MQB
Talk:Volvo XC60

message: OK, Im new and am intrested in, and genuinely would like to contrbute to wikipedia, so I thought I'd start with something I have an intrest in. K here goes.
Should this article be re-writen now that the production has been announced? concept tag/banner/badge (I don't know what it should be called)removed? or should this article remain the xc60 concept page, and a production XC60 page be created?
Here
http://www.volvocars.com/us/footer/about/NewsAndEvents/Pages/AllnewVolvoXC60.aspx
and to a lesser extent here
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/20/officially-official-2009-volvo-xc60-debuts-ahead-of-geneva/
gabehacker 00:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Production article 

message: The Wiki entry states that the AWD Haldex version used is 3, yet going to the reference Wiki entry, states that the Volvo XC60 uses version 4. Anybody knows for sure which one is it? Any reference?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.74.86.92 (talk) 08:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AWD Haldex 
Talk:Timor (car)

message: The reason for removing the "project" templates from this talk page is because "Timor (car)" is only a redirect to the actual article. In other words, the project template and its quality and importance ranking belongs on the talk page of the actual article (with the correct name and appropriate section) about the automobile, and not on a redirect to that article.This is because a redirect page is not an article and does not need to be assessed, such as whether is has low or high importance. It is also not possible to "improve" the quality of a redirect page by adding more content! Attaching these project templates on this page also messes up the summary project statistics. There is no need to list this redirect as an extra article included the project summary table. Therefore, I have removed the notices so as to clean up this "talk" on the redirect page. Thanks! CZmarlin (talk) 01:33, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Mazda Xedos

message: I'm wondering whether this stub ought to be deleted - the Xedos 6 is already adequately covered in its own article, while the Xedos 9 is quite effectively detailed under the Mazda Millenia article. Since Xedos wasn't much more than a marginally successful branding exercise, I don't see the point in giving it a whole page. Discussion is certainly welcome... Duncan1800 (talk) 11:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion candidate? 

message: Deletion, no; perhaps merge with the Milennia article ?
--RichardMills65 (talk) 03:26, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: In my view no, there is lots of scope for expansion here and the Milennia was in any case not the only car sold under the Xedos brand.Rangoon11 (talk) 15:49, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  deletion ?
Talk:Øresund Line

message: When the Malmo City Tunnel is complete, will there be a grade separated swapping of the tracks? Presumably the City Tunnel has left hand running as in the rest of Sweden, whereas the Oresund Bridge has right hand running.--218.102.90.48 (talk) 06:47, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It will be located north of Malmö central station, and the construction of it can be seen at  --BIL (talk) 09:55, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Malmo Tunnel 