lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:USS Momsen

message: Greetings, I'm onboard USS MOMSEN (DDG 92) at this time and due to operations security constraints cannot provide any updates to MOMSEN.  I have something called "REEF POINTS" which goes into more about MOMSEN and will double check some of the facts as listed.  Probably won't get to it right-away, since I'm new to Wikepedia and want to learn more about it first.
Garnertr (talk) 04:40, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: May 2005

message: Citations must be done properly according to Wikipedia:Citing sources.
Also, please sign your talk page entries by typing four tildes.
Renduy (talk) 02:42, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: March 2008

message: I don’t know how to add this. 
https://alaskapublic.org/2023/05/10/navy-warship-uss-momsen-makes-surprise-visit-to-homer/ 66.58.170.234 (talk) 22:37, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: - wolf 16:42, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Momsen came to Homer, AK
Talk:Pyroelectric fusion

message: Good article - but are you sure that the following sentence is correct: "the process does not appear to be able to generate net power" ?
The Economist article on this experiment (http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3909490) states that the team were unwilling to speculate whether their apparatus could produce net energy if it were scaled up.--New Thought 12:43, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't bother.  I worked the calculations for research, and it's impossible.   Only a small fraction of the energy input into the crystal to heat it up goes into charge (much less than 1%), and fusion yields being what they are, it's not going to produce more than a tiny fraction of the input. 74.167.234.252 22:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pyroelectric fusion

message: Anyone know how this differs from a Farnsworth Fusor? — Preceding unsigned comment added by  129.22.154.164 (talk • contribs) 
:Deuterium is accelerated from a charged tip into a solid object? - Omegatron July 1, 2005 00:34 (UTC)
::yes, deuterium ions (deuterons) are accelerated into a deuterium-containing target,  where the Where most conventional fusion research revolves around confining a ball of high-energy plasma in which fusion can occur, this is much more similar to a particle accerator.  74.167.234.252 22:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I do (I'm working in the field now). A Farnsworth fusor uses an electrical high-voltage source and a wire mesh to accelerate and trap ions; this setup uses crystals to generate the high electrical potential, and produces a beam (as with a particle accelerator) rather than a fusing plasma.  74.167.234.252 22:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Farnsworth Fusor
Talk:Trelech

message: I have removed most of this article, as the information was actually about Trellech in Monmouthshire, not this Trelech. Sorry! Cantiorix (talk) 07:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Badaga language

message: Except for the first paragraph, there is no information on the language, all of it is on the Badagas people. Could we move any extra information there and then delete stuff not related to the actual language? --Chlämens 18:33, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that seems necessary to me, too. (Answering after exactly two years... *gg*) --Thogo (Talk)  Some thoughts about enwiki 12:36, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move information to Badagas 

message: What are u doing 171.76.82.207 (talk) 13:42, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are u doing
Talk:Cammell Laird

message: I have the company listed as "Cammell-Laird & Company" in the appendix on destroyer builders in Destroyers of the Royal Navy, 1893-1981 (Maurice Cocker, 1983, Ian Allan ) and as "Cammell, Laird & Company" in Janes Fighting Ships of World War II (Tiger Books, 1998, ). Can anyone confirm what the correct title is with a view to perhaps moving the article to the correct name if either of the above are correct. Emoscopes Talk 13:01, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Ferry Site and Wirral Archives have Cammell Laird Shipbuilders as the building yard. Ian Boyle/Simplon Postcards has Harland and Wolff. Is there a more reliable source? Finavon (talk) 13:50, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: answered my own question - 2 ships:  (H&W) and  (CL). Finavon (talk) 18:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  MV ''Ulster Queen''
Talk:WTF

message: Because of too many funny people, this article has been locked for new and unregistered users, hence here... Anyways, WTF stands for Web Template Framework which to my knowledge is also used in Mozilla software. -andy 77.190.24.237 (talk) 16:45, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF (Software Engineering) 

message: What about Waking the Fallen by Avenged Sevenfold?
78.43.29.144 (talk) 16:49, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no indication whatsoever in the article that this is commonly referred to by the initials. older ≠ wiser 17:01, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTF 

message: Please change the first entry, "wtf, language code for Dumpu, a Trans–New Guinean language" to show "wtf, language code for the Watiwa language, a Trans–New Guinean language" instead. Tenkyu tumas. - 108.59.48.1 (talk) 19:51, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Stickee (talk) 22:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please change  

message: The usage and primary topic of  is under discussion, see talk:Whiskey Tango Foxtrot -- 70.51.44.60 (talk) 06:05, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Whiskey Tango Foxtrot" 

message: WTF may also refer Waive to Function which is israeli slang for approving functional unit testing on the workplace Killthepuppet (talk) 11:22, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Question: The article Waive to Function does not exist. Is there an article which describes the term? See WP:DABENTRY, the bit that says "Include exactly one navigable (blue) link to efficiently guide readers to the most relevant article for that use of the ambiguous term". --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 12:19, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

text: unless you can provide enough sources to assert notability. -- Alexf(talk) 16:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 February 2018
Talk:University of Edinburgh

message: Hi all,
I'm new to Wikipedia but I thought I would ask: would it make sense to move colleges and schools to the academic profile portion of the page? I would think rewriting a small blurb regarding the schools would function well for the governance portion while moving the juicy parts to the academic section? Bobbyshmurday (talk) 21:04, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Bobby, welcome to Wikipedia! Sorry it's taken so long for someone to answer your suggestion. I have taken a look at the two areas you mention, and 'Academic Profile' has to do with the University's performance and international reputation, and the measures taken to sustain and enhance that - hence the categorisation 'profile'. The Colleges and Schools are administrative layers integral to the University's organisational structure, and so I believe they're best left under present heading of 'Organisation and Administration'. Does that make sense? Chrisdevelop (talk) 02:50, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moving 'Colleges and Schools' to academic profile?
Talk:NIPRNet

message: The article says NIPRNet is airgapped by design, but then it says that SIPRNet is tunneled over NIPRNet.  That's clearly not an air gap.  So which is it?  This actually seems like a critical public policy point, because a non-airgapped classified network creates a serious security vulnerability. -- Beland (talk) 03:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no air gap between SIPRNet and NIPRNet.  It is possible to access SIPRNet via NIPRNet by tunneling, as described in the FCW article at http://fcw.com/articles/2002/12/08/marines-tunnel-to-siprnet.aspx. It also appears that there is no air gap between NIPRNet and the public Internet(s) (http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/NIPRNET certainly implies this), although it might once have been the case that SIPRNet and NIPRNet together were air-gapped from the public Internet(s), which would mean there was no way to access SIPRNet from a public Internet node - you would have to be physically connected to NIPRNet (or SIPRNet itself).  The matter is confused by a lot of documents (like http://safeandvault.com/index.php/faq/115-gsa-containers/569-siprnet-network-procedure) that describe an "air gapped" connection between SIPRNet and NIPRNet when what is actually meant is that (hopefully strong) encryption and authorization is required to tunnel into SIPRNet from NIPRNet (there are also presumably additional restrictions on traffic between NIPRNet and the public Internet). @alex (talk) 18:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Having never read formal documentation but doing things for the USG, no, you cannot access SIPRNet from NIPRNet, or vice versa. It is true that SIPRNet is  transmitted across NIPRNet at many points, but it is encrypted, probably using TACLANEs. In terms of the way the USG does security and their definition of "air gap," I would say that, yes, there is an air gap. (See Air gap.)  "Tunneling in" is not really a fair term as two separate terminals would be required—one unclassified, and one classified. You cannot "tunnel into" SIPRNet from NIPRNet. The Internet is accessible from NIPRNet proper, though that does not mean that they are one and the same.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.70.194.247 (talk) 06:17, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Airgapped or not? 

message: The version of the acronym used by the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) - owner of NIPERNET - is "NIPRNET". This can be seen in the Directive-Type Memorandum (DTM) 09-026 "Responsible and Effective Use of Internet-Based Capabilities" . For the sake of consistency and to avoid confusion, Wikipedia should adopt the acronym version used by DoD itself. Kolibrical (talk) 01:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  NIPRnet or NIPRNET?
Talk:The Dream of the Fisherman's Wife

message: There's no need to censor the meaning of this word. http://nihongo.monash.edu/cgi-bin/wwwjdic?1MDJ%A4%DC%A4%DC Wikipedia:Offensive material given the context. 194.207.86.26 (talk) 13:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "bobo"
Talk:The Wonders (fictional band)

message: On April 23, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was merge and redirect.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/The Wonders for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:20, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: Brian 09:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Reverted vandalism
Talk:Stephen Hesford

message: Wondering about various things on this article, several phrases seem fairly  biased against Stephen Hesford. "Most damning of all, he warns that she is "38, single and unmarried". All this in a "clean" election fight." This seems particularly biased, the "Most damning of all" seeming sarcastic, and the "clean" election comment seeming biased again. Also, "During the 2005 election campaign he was condemed in the Telegraph Newspaper for labeling his Conservative opponent, former TV presenter Esther McVey, a "blonde bimbo"" The actual quote seems to be "blonde Scouser" (source: http://www.wirralwestconservatives.co.uk/). Not sure about NPOV and things, I don't edit much. Halibut 14:25, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:List of horse racing venues

message: Please call the English tracks by the names they are generally known by. "Town Moor" is Doncaster.
Try to do this comprehensively. It's very easy to get a list of tracks by country. The turf associations for each country has them. Just listing the ones you can think of is not as good as researching it properly.
I think you'd be better off making a category Horse racetracks, if one doesn't exist, and listing that here. There's a "British racecourses" category. You might want to consult that, although it's a bit underpopulated. Grace Note 14:28, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good idea, but my opinion is that this article shows information all at once; name of track, location, and significant races held there. You are welcome to make any changes to English track names as well as updating categories, but I also think it is a good thing to have this list here. MPS 14:13, 9 May 2005 (UTC)

text: Yesterday i added a list of every South American track i could confirm, but to do so for countries like France or Australia (where every village has an own track) would be way too much for this article.Malc82 17:41, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems Shangai racetracks is now place of museum.
And you can check from  the said Wiki article what happened to Beijing Jockey Club. 
Yakuzakyuu (talk) 17:38, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  China.. 

message: Jockey Club of Turkey
web: www.tjk.org  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.200.222.50 (talk) 08:02, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jockey Club of Turkey 

message: Good faith edit (I corrected the grammar) ... needs a REF but I suggest letting it stand for the moment Alanf777 (talk) 03:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  France 

message: I believe such lists should be composed only of venues with articles, or redlinked venues with sources showing notability (ie they exist and meet some minimal threshhold of use). I also think its inappropriate to limit the list to existing venues. The title of the list doesnt exclude defunct ones. WP is not meant to be a directory, like a phone book. Im very new to any horse racing editing, and i dont feel up to addressing this, esp. without anyone else weighing in.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 17:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: likely as not unread comment
Talk:Main Street District, Dallas

message: On April 23, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Main Street, Dallas, Texas for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 14:41, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD
Talk:1-san

message: Someone should make an image for this page. --Liface 22:21, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Very late in coming but: Done! Colincbn 16:39, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't get it. It doesn't look like anything. SharkD 16:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ASCII Art

message: Is there some specific reason I'm missing for this edit? (I'm asking because the anon who made the edit in general doesn't seem to be a vandal, so I don't just want to revert it outright). Don't think the entire article has any reason to be in MS P-Gothic; it certainly isn't necessary for any of the text to display properly, besides the ASCII art itself. Cheers, cab 06:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  font tag
Talk:Continuous obsolescence

message: A casualty of this phenomenon.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.76.252.185 (talk) 07:06, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Starcraft ghost 

message: What is this article about? The fact that some software survives many releases, and is being constantly rewritten? I think, this is the sign of success. Twitter did it, Facebook did it, Google did it. Is not it better than just throwing away the product and closing the company?
Or I misunderstood something? The article is a puzzle to me.
Vlad Patryshev (talk) 22:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it an antipattern? Is it even a pattern?
Talk:Custom software

message: On April 23, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion.  The result was keep.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Custom Software for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 15:01, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: VfD

message: Would be nice to have some more info regarding:
1. Is custom software owned by the sponsor or is it licensed by the software developer? I believe it would be determined by a contract between the developer and the sponsor. In lieu of a contract then both parties would have a legal claim of ownership. A contract is typically a license to use the custom software under an EULA. But there is more to it I am sure.
2. If a software developer writes the custom software for a sponsor/company, do they have a legal obligation to maintain it and provide a warranty? Again probably determined by a EULA but what happens when there isn't one? How do the laws of the land effect things when there is no EULA and also when there is an EULA.
3. If the author of the custom software is a contractor to the customer i.e. the customer got an external company/contractor to write the custom software, is the author liable for or legally bound to the custom software?
4. Does the author as an employee of the sponsor whom develops the custom software for the company have any rights of ownership (e.g. intellectual property)? Can the author develop that software into a product and register patents for it etc. Should the author sign a contract with the company relinquishing any ownership rights?
5. What is the status quo and legal position in regard to the above?
6. Exactly how is custom software treated differently with respect to packaged software from the sponsors perspective and the developers perspective?
Signed
Coder  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.237.52.243 (talk) 19:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  custom software 

message: I propose to merge the section "advantages and disadvantages" into "considerations". I see no good reason to keep the sections separate; they are inherently overlapping. Perhaps after we have done so, we could identify subsections of the new merged section, though. -greenrd (talk) 19:00, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposal to merge sections
Talk:Nick Gilder

message: The Infobox lists Gilder as still being active, but the article describes that his last new work was to be released "in 2005, but it was shelved."  Later works published since then are either compilations of older material or re-releases of previously written songs for new movie soundtracks.  Is over a dozen years with no new work long enough for us to chracterize him as "inactive"? --Eliyahu S Talk 14:07, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Updated w/ref showing that he continues to do concerts, including the casino circuit, as of mid 2020; no 2021 dates shown as COVID-19 pandemic in Canada continues to take lives. Jmg38 (talk) 10:31, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still active?
Talk:Financial analysis

message: May I suggest that this page is kind of a dead-end for someone looking for information on stock picking or business valuation.  I would suggest we do a redirect to "fundamental analysis".  There would be some changes to make there too.  
I will do this if there is no objection.  Retail Investor 16:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I made some major revisions to include certain information that will allow readers to appreciate the importance of the term. Based on actual experience, I included examples on the use of financial analysis by business owners and management. Modelwatcher 15:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed redirect

message: I have this important question to ask that is npv ,irr, mirr also the part of the financial analysis
:NPV can be if you are doing an analysis of cash flows and looking to buy a company. - not if you are just using the financial statements
::NPV can also be used in doing forecasting reports and feasibility studies, which financial analysts sometimes do, and they make use of financial statements to come up with the figures. Modelwatcher 15:18, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: npv, irr, mirr
Talk:History of Oceania

message: The article has a bit about beginnings of American colonialism in Oceania but nothing about 20th century and present state. Kipala (talk) 15:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  American colonialism?
Talk:The Wretched of the Earth

message: Hi Editors,
I'm a student editor through the Wikipedia education initiative. I've made extensive additions to the article, creating a new section on the essay 'On National Culture'. As this is my first major edit, I'd appreciate any feedback, suggestions on how we could improve the section, or whether it truly belongs in this article. Jordan.d.o (talk) 22:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  'On National Culture' Addition
Talk:Order of the Crown

message: 'My freinds,  I am not content with this wikifacation. The order is called " order of the Crown" NOT "Dutch Order of the Crown"!
A page reffering to the " British Order of Merit" would allso be wrong. There are dozens of Orders that are called "Order of Merit", but there is no "British Order of Merit"! 
Who helps me to make propper links like the one that i added to this page i.e " The Order of the Oak Crown of the Grand Duchy of Luxemburg.''
I SUGGEST:
The Order of the Crown of the kingdom of  Prussia
The Order of the Crown a division of the house Order of Orange ( Netherlands)
I TRIED BUT THE LINKS DID NOT WORK.....
I plan to add several other orders of the crown like the ones in Italy, Wuertemberg. Thailand and Japan.   Robert Prummel
:The titles of the article do not refelct the literal name of the decoration.  if there are multiple articles with the same name, but different subjects, a disambiguation page is created.  Various articles are then created with "sub-headers" such as Order of the Empire (Great Britian), Order of the Empire (Germany), Order of the Empire (Russia) [Thats just an example, I dont know if there really is an "Order of the Empire"].  In any event, the article about the rank of Fleet Admiral is a good exmaple.  The articles are sorted by country name and, of course, the various countries dont call the rank "Fleet Admiral U.S.", "Fleet Admiral Russia", etc.  But the articles are named as such to separate the same topic based on different countries. -Husnock 17:04, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:Neuropeptide

message: Coexist List The Biohemical Basis of Neuropharmacology Oxford Press 1996--McDogm 16:16, 6 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The section about Candace Pert and how thoughts that are "loving and empowering" can boost the immune system seems awefully subjective and a little unscientific. Unless a reference for solid empirical evidence to support these statements exists, I think that this bit should be removed
Owz182 - 4th May 2008 17:16 GMT  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Owz182 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Candace Pert

message: under 5HT the neuropeptide TRH is not linked although a wiki page does exist.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.95.33 (talk) 09:47, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples 

message: This page nicely explains the difference between neuropeptides and peptide hormones, and then ignores the distinction by indistinguishably referencing members of both classes.
173.25.54.191 (talk) 05:13, 11 December 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: They're not necessarily a dichotomy.  Neurotransmitters and neuropeptides can be hormones, like dopamine and ghrelin respectively. Ghrelin is both a neuropeptide and a (peptide) hormone. The combined topic/field of study is neuroendocrinology though neuroendocrine cell is more relevant to this particular case. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢ | Maintained) 07:36, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  vs Peptide hormones 

message: The Neuropeptide Functions have been further elaborated.Physiological Effects of each is tried to be explained briefly.
Pushpa Ramakrishnan (talk) 06:39, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:RAF Cottesmore

message: No runway data like there is for other RAF stations. anyone got the info? 84.9.34.192 03:19, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  runways 

message: 1.4 billion cut from the helicopter budget by Gordon Brown in 2002. Then the death of the station announced in Dec 2009.Jatrius (talk) 17:17, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Labour Party's Sacrifice of the Station