lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Winston-Salem Northern Beltway

message: I think the article should be renamed to Winston-Salem Northern Beltway. The northern section is the only one that NCDOT has indicated as proposed, and it is referred to almost exclusively as "Northern Beltway" by NCDOT and the media. The southern section is only indicated on long-range planning documents by the city of Winston-Salem and is not an active project by NCDOT. In addition to renaming, the information about the southern section of the beltway should be relegated to a "Future" article section. Does anyone have any objections? Roadsguy (talk) 05:45, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename article "Winston-Salem Northern Beltway" 

message: I was wondering if there would be any use to adding the two shields to the infobox as the two component highways are only temporary and will likely be removed when the sections are officially designated. DiscoA340 (talk) 09:50, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Eventually the state highway signs should be replaced by the interstate signs, when it becomes official. The infobox should be showing what is present, not what is to come unless the roadway in question has not been constructed yet. At this time of writing, NC 74 exists on the ground and NC 452 was officially designated to the future western section back in 1999. --WashuOtaku (talk) 12:26, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add Future I-74 and I-274 highway shields to the infobox 

message: According to Google Maps, North Carolina Highway 74 is open to traffic from US 311 to US 52. Is this accurate and sourced? I see nothing published by NCDOT. I suspect misinformation on Google's end. If it is open, will anyone update the map? JlamRoadgeek 04:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Google Maps is wrong. On November 7, 2022, the next section of NC 74 will open between US 311 and NC 66, here's an article about it. They estimate US 52 interchange will open in Summer 2023. --WashuOtaku (talk) 12:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NC 74 from US 311 to US 52 complete?
Talk:Public Services Association

message: I removed the following text from the article because 
# It was completely unsourced (granted, so is the current article)
# There are huge tone and structure problems 
If it can be sourced, there's probably some good info in there, but it needs to be completely rewritten to conform with the WP:MOS. Guettarda (talk) 18:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text removed
Talk:Game 6

message: I found
: The film depicts the events of October 25, 1986 in the life of Nicky Rogan, specifically the opening of his latest play juxtaposed with Game 6 of the 1986 World Series, with a screenplay that Don DeLillo wrote in 1991. 
and i was annoyed with myself for not being able to place Rogan. And damn: no link to his article! Oh, that's because he's a fictchar.   I don't think that happened just bcz the film i saw tonite was 95% historical; the specific date and the lk to the real-world Series are details that are mixed in one sentence IMO with effect of unacceptably obscure the line between fiction with historical characters, and fiction with fictional characters deeply affected by historical events.   Here's my try at doing more (not just failure to link the character to a WP article) to clarify what (i assume) constitutes that boundary:
: Its fictional playwright, Nicky Rogan, has a stage play opening on the day of the sixth game of the 1986 World Series.
Or (if October 25, or that day of 1986, has a significance that requires -- not just offers the screenwriter the option -- to specify the date) insert that much of the date in place of, or just before, "the day of".   Now, i don't know jack about the film or the game (unless it was the "and the ball rolls between the fielder's legs" one), and i hope someone who does know jack will note here whether i've blown it or not.--Jerzy•t 02:57, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Makes Rogan sound like historical person
Talk:Pirates, Vikings and Knights II

message: Started it off but needs alot of work
--Charlie.B 21:59, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Blocking is now directional (meaning, a block to the left will be most effective against a strike coming from the left). I'm not really keen on adding that tidbit to the article, as it's already overly detailed, and it the style of a guide to the game. Perhaps if someone wants to rewrite it... --daranz[ t ] 16:32, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

message: I gave the article B class status. It's cited pretty well and appropriately, and flows smoothly. I would try to put some more info into the critical reception area given it's small at the moment compared to the rest, and could easily be bulked up a bit. Good job with it as it stands, especially in such short time.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:49, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article assessment 

message: I propose the article's name be changed to "Pirates Vikings & Knights II" to fit with the new art and the removal of punctuation that is not proper for titles. --Pyroguy (talk) 17:50, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: If the punctuation is in how the official sources put the name in normal text, then it should be in the page name here. Not once on the official site is "Pirates Vikings & Knights II" used, either in normal text or the logo. What is used in official sources is a variety of "Pirates, Vikings, & Knights II" (as used in the site logo and in Steam), "Pirates, Vikings and Knights II" (as used in the site title for browsers) and "Pirates, Vikings & Knights II" (as used on the about page and on their wikia). Any of those three is suitable as a page name for this article, but "Pirates Vikings & Knights II", with no commas, isn't as it isn't the proper format. -- Sabre (talk) 23:57, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Title Change
Talk:Herbert William Heinrich

message: Just dropped by to read up on Heinrich's law. But why is there more information on what someone theoretically thinks is wrong with Heinrich's research than about Heinrich and his own work? Very strange ratio of information. This article should really be revised to be more balanced and useful204.15.96.67 (talk) 01:44, 10 July 2014.
H. W. Heinrich did important work which is still cited today and deserves a better entry than this which is all I can do with current resources, sorry.MartinY 22:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: Is not right to believe that by fixing minor incidents major incidents will be controlled. 216.164.255.126 (talk) 00:49, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This theory is not totally accurate…
Talk:Eleva, Wisconsin

message: I request a photo of the elevator with the name ELEVA painted on the side. Royalbroil 00:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo request
Talk:Homestead (Star Trek: Voyager)

message: I've noticed not a single contention among Memory Beta's writers regarding this episode being April 5.  Have none of you ever thought that that was...strange...or even wrong? [User: Stripey].
:If you have proof it is another way, post it! Wikipedia encourages people to be bold. Lots42 (talk) 02:19, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The episode shows the celebration of the 315th anniversary of First Contact, which itself is clearly established in the canon (namely, Star Trek: First Contact) as having taken place on April 5, 2063. Really no question here. -- 82.198.201.170 (talk) 10:17, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Date

message: I've found at least a few sources which might be useful in developing this article, although I am myself less than completely sure how reliable all of them are, this area of wikipedia not being my specialty.
*This article from Trek Today] discusses the preparation before the development of the episode.
*this article from Blastr describes the episode as having one of the 10 standout moments of the series.
*This page lists several books many of which at least mention the episode in question.
If anyone who knows TV articles better than I do (pretty much anyone, actually) wants to maybe help figure out how to add material from these sources, or, if they don't know this type of article any better than I do, wants to just help review the sources to see what looks like it might merit inclusion in the article, feel free to do so. John Carter (talk) 21:31, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Education in West Virginia

message: The "stigma" section is an inappropriate editorial and orignal research.  --SamC (talk) 18:28, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research section

message: The number of schools in the West Virginia Board of Education section hasn't been updated since the section was established in 2006. It's been given as a static 834 for the past 18 years (when that number was more or less current), but WV's DoE data for public schools as of the 2022-3 school year only list 618. There have been a large number of closures and consolidations that have never been reflected by this article. Enwilson (talk) 15:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Current number of schools (as of 2022-3)
Talk:The Show (SDSU student section)

message: *Sorry, I jumped the gun and added speedy deletion when I saw this article.  Does "The Show" deserve its own article?  Very debatable...all of the (relevant, encyclopedic) info in this article could just as easily have been included in SDSU Aztecs in a short blurb.  I suppose I could have just deleted everything but the intro and stubbed it.  Thoughts?
--IRelayer 22:13, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed my mind.--IRelayer 22:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I saw this when it was first created, and tried to make significant changes while prompting the original author to question its validity and information content. I think it should stay as an article, and I like the recent substantial edit/reduction. More could be added, from a nuetral viewpoint, in the future. Streltzer 18:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

text: It's not a vote, but I removed the Prod anyway (I was the one to Prod it in the first place). Anytime an article is Prodded (see WP:Prod) you can remove the message if you disagree and then it might go to Articles for Deletion for the discussion. The CSTV article probably doesn't pass wikipedia's standard on reliable sources, but it's possible that there are sources out there so I'm not worried about this anymore. It could possibly become an interesting article, so I have no objections anymore. Phydend (talk) 22:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Deletion issues

message: *DO NOT DELETE. It appears to me that the notability of this group has to do with its awareness by the basketball fan community in the SDSU Aztecs and in the Mountain West Conference communities. As shown by the CSTV article reference, the SDSU Show certainly is "notable" in the generic, dictionary sense -- it was distinguished from other groups of fans, and it is prominent in the SDSU and MWC communities. On that basis, I vote that we do NOT delete this article. Streltzer (talk) 21:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a vote, but I removed the Prod anyway (I was the one to Prod it in the first place). Anytime an article is Prodded (see WP:Prod) you can remove the message if you disagree and then it might go to Articles for Deletion for the discussion. The CSTV article probably doesn't pass wikipedia's standard on reliable sources, but it's possible that there are sources out there so I'm not worried about this anymore. It could possibly become an interesting article, so I have no objections anymore. Phydend (talk) 22:17, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2007-01-08/Goldacre-Holford controversy

message: Best. Headline. Ever. :) -- Schnee (cheeks clone) 22:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ral315 deserves the credit for that! I wrote the story but he supplied the headline. Sam Blacketer 22:29, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I enjoy the occasional pun or two :)  Ral315 (talk) 22:55, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:El Pollo Loco

message: I recall seeing El Pollo Loco restauraunts in the Tampa Bay area in the mid/late 1980s. What happened to them? - Aerobird 22:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There was one in the Pine Hills area of Orlando as well in the late 80's. It was closed due to health violations. Railfan2012 (talk) 03:30, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Florida locations

message: Is this article large enough yet to be split into multiple articles or pages? If so, I suggest breaking the article into three (3) separate pages. Here are my suggestions:
* The page for the American company should be called either El Pollo Loco (United States) or El Pollo Loco, Inc., both of which are currently redirects to the section El Pollo Loco#United States.
* The page for the Mexican company should be called either El Pollo Loco (Mexico) or El Pollo Loco, S.A. de C.V., both of which are currently redirects to the section El Pollo Loco#Mexico.
* The current page El Pollo Loco should be made into a disambiguation per WP:D with a short paragraph about the historical relationship between the two companies.
Are both sections currently large enough to stand by themselves? If the consensus is to have this article split up, I would suggest that each resulting articles need to describe its company's relationship to its counterpart and also the affects of the 2007 lawsuit between the two companies. Are there any opinions on this topic? -- 68.50.32.85 (talk) 00:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is this article ready to be split into three pages? 

message: there were also two stores in New Zealand until 1990.
New Zealand Journal of History
https://www.nzjh.auckland.ac.nz › ...PDF
'If there's not one near you now, there soon will be' 2407:7000:9FD8:B600:A01B:2D62:B469:5EE9 (talk) 02:59, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Direct link: If there's not one near you now, there soon will be-gadfium 06:17, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two stores in New Zealand
Talk:Lydia Becker

message: * I added a pic for you/us. However the source of the picture is here and this seems noteworthy if Lydia was involved? Victuallers (talk) 09:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Lake Rotokākahi

message: Is this website useful as a citation for the ownership of the Lake? https://www.rotorualakes.co.nz/lake-rotokakahi 120.159.142.52 (talk) 06:06, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citation
Talk:Lake Ōkataina

message: Okataina caldera redirects to this article, but I'm not sure that's appropriate.  This article is only for a lake in the region, while the Okataina caldera covers a wider area including all of Mount Tarawera.  A proper article for the caldera needs to be written using reliable sources, but I'm not sure of the best place to start.  Here are some links I found so far from a brief Google search. - Gilgamesh (talk) 19:42, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorted by others initially as certainly not appropriate - little bit like having Yellowstone volcano redirect to Yellowstone Lake.  Hopefully have helped made both articles more shipshape over time. ChaseKiwi (talk) 22:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Okataina caldera
Talk:Lake Tekapo

message: I propose removing the sections about the statue of the sheepdog, and the Church of the Good Shepherd from this article, to reduce overlap in content with Lake Tekapo (town), given that these features are:
* physically located in the Lake Tekapo town area
* adequately described in the article Lake Tekapo (town)
Marshelec (talk) 07:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I still think relocation of most content about Church of Good Shepherd, and statue of sheepdog is worthwhile, but I propose to leave a brief summary and a "main" link in this article.  Comments ?? Marshelec (talk) 20:33, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reducing overlapping content with Lake Tekapo (town)
Talk:William Daniels (cinematographer)

message: The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article.-- Jreferee 23:22, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: Although a number of reference sources (including IMDb), have listed the subject of this article as "William H. Daniels" and he was credited as "William H." on a number of films, including one (1963's How the West Was Won) for which he received an Academy Award nomination, his most frequent on-screen billing was, in fact, "William Daniels". His credits as "William" appearing in The American Film Institute Catalog of Motion Pictures greatly exceed those in which is billed as "William H." Furthermore, his listing in the Academy Award database is "William", rather than "William H." The Oscar win was for 1948's The Naked City, in which he is credited as "William". —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 19:15, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: [[William H. Daniels]] or [[William Daniels (cinematographer)]]
Talk:Lake Alexandrina (New Zealand)

message: I'm thinking of adding one of my personal photos to the page, but just wanted to check here if others approved before posting it ... http://prsb.co/3/files/2010/07/Panorama_mt_john2.jpg  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.215.153.18 (talk) 17:23, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Battle of Montevideo (1807)

message: Hi,
English is not my first language, but .... Is this sentence grammatically correct?
" The latter, in this; his first campaign, would later become famous as Lieutenant General Sir Harry Smith."
'In his first campaign Smith would be famous later...' ?
T83.109.180.48 (talk) 21:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar
Talk:Christopher Bernau

message: It has been suggested that the subject of this article is eligible for inclusion in the list of HIV-positive people. If you know of any reliable source that helps to clarify this person's HIV status then please mention it on the list's talk page. Trezatium 19:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know of any verifiable info on his HIV status. I'm concerned about adding that to the article, and I am concerned that no citation is there for the fact that he was gay. I believe in both cases these are correct statements, but as always, we need verifiable citations to support these statements. NickBurns 03:04, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: HIV status
Talk:Gene Raymond

message: I removed the allegations of LGBTQ status that originate from the University of Mississippi Press, which is a fringe source.  An editor known as "Tim1965" has repeatedly added text with these allegations.  Should this page become protected?  Is anyone other than Tim1965 reading this?  Tim1965 should read WP:SYNTH, and WP:DUE. Unless Tim1965 has found significant coverage of LGBTQ status in reliable secondary sources about Gene Raymond, this is not going to pass muster. Also do not make changes to comments made by other editors. That is extremely rude.Brent Brant (talk) 21:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tim1965 is trying to add a fringe source.
Talk:Rudolph Snellius

message: Since there was no existing article about Snellius on Wikipedia, I posted what I could to get something up here.  There is very little about Snellius in English on the web.  Most of my information (as cited) comes from the brief sketch of Snellius in Carl Bang's excellent book on Arminius.  I hope others will add and emend where necessary. Sarvodaya 22:44, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:People by association

message: This category was developed to handle the assortment of categories that keep cropping up that organize people just by their association with some movement, idea, event, time, etc.  --lquilter 22:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

message: Would People by affiliation be a better name?  People by association suggests, perhaps, people organized by associations to which they belong. --lquilter 22:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Better name?
Talk:Louay Chanko

message: It is nonsense that Louay Chanko is an “Assyrian”. This false identity is something that has poisoned every single Aramean article on Wikipedia. Louay Chanko  is nothing else than an Aramean…and became a hero by the Syriac-Aramean football club Syrianska FC in Sweden! Source: http://www.svenskafans.com/fotboll/syrianska/148576.aspx--ArameanSyriac (talk) 19:30, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Şehzade Mustafa

message: I'm not an expert on this, but at current it seems a little bit biased?
Furius 10:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I tried but I can't find a photo. I think it is because he couldn't be the emperor. He was forgotten in a sense but I'm expanding the article thesedays. We will see what can we do. Deliogul 19:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo 

message: What does Mukhlisi mean?--Jandkay (talk) 02:50, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mukhlisi? 

message: Although there are 7 sources, The section After the execution needs to be sourced. It reads; Mustafa's army found the execution unfair because they were thinking that the reason of the execution was the political maneuvers of Hurrem Sultan and Rüstem Pasha, neither of whom were Anatolian or Turkish. The first part of the sentence is correct but in Ottoman Empire ethnical origin had never been a matter of debate. Besides even Mustafa' s mother Gülbahar was also a non Anatolian. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 09:51, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  After the execution  

message: I suggest we remove this section as it appears to be pure original research and no one has been able to provide a reliable source for it since a year ago. Keivan.fTalk 19:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wives and issue 

message: What's the issue with the spouses???Are they real??I just wanted to know!! Khondoker Jobair (talk) 10:48, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spouse
Talk:Fernando Zevallos

message: I stumbled upon this article a couple of months back. It read like a fan-site. I attempted to insert some accuracy, rewrite the poor prose and bring details of drugs charges up to date. The tone of the peice has since been amended - by someone else - to present a more rose-tinted view of Zevallos. I have done my best to redress this. But I do not have time to keep on rechecking this page. Nor do I consider myself a world expert on Mr Zevallos and his misdeeds - alleged and actual. So if anyone out there has the time and the knowledge to give this article the once over, it would really help. In the meantime, I shall ask some of my Peruvian journalist friends to see if they can add their tuppence worth so as to give a truer reflection of Fernando Zevallos. David Cohen 22:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ummm, it is obvious that u dont know much about this case at all. every article written here, has been composed with facts, not statements from newspaper articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.3.231.33 (talk) 06:06, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
File talk:ThisHeatDeceit1991booklet.jpg

message: This image is not the front cover of Deceit. I believe, but am not at all sure, that it is the back cover from the original LP configuration.  This image and enlarged excerpts thereof are included in the paper insert from the 1991 CD.  (These images are also included in the 2006 version, albeit in modified form.)  The image ties in with the album's theme concerning nuclear war.  This is discussed in the Deceit article (as of this writing) and so I believe the inclusion of this image in that article qualifies as fair use. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 22:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Yellow Hedgerow Dreamscape

message: There isn't any other article with the name, Yellow Hedgerow Dreamscape, at least, none that I can find. So what's the point in making this article name so specific?  At the very least, a redirect from "Yellow Hedgerow Dreamscape" might be convenient. Kerrow 22:56, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Made the redirect, though it might be easier to just move it.. Eh, to hell with it, not worth bothering with at this point. Kerrow 23:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why "(album)"?