lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:European football records

message: I've never heard the term Grand Slam applied in this way before, on top of which the hat-trick of trophies is likely to be discussed less and less now that the Cup Winners Cup has been abolished. Does this count as original research? sjorford 09:25, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since "Grand Slam" doesn't seem to be an especially common name for this feat, and certainly not an official one, perhaps a generic title would be better - List of clubs winning all 3 European football cups, or something? It's hard to find a title that's unambiguous and not too long, though. sjorford →•← 11:55, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: How about change to UEFA competition records (along the lines of Football records in England) and add more info like record attendances? Bornintheguz 14:49, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title 

message: I've put in a request on WP:RM - my recommendation is that it is moved to European football records and allowed to expand, although I'm open to suggestions. Any other ideas? sjorford →•← 14:29, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not fully convinced that European football records is the best title, but it's the best suggestion so far.  If anyone can come up with another then please discuss it here.  violet/riga (t) 21:34, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move request

message: Due to the long-running edit war, I have protected this article and three others where the same UEFA Cup/ Fairs Cup dispute is occurring. Protection is not an endorsement of the current version (see m:The Wrong Version). As for all four articles the dispute is identical, I suggest discussion ought to take place on one page to help keep track. This page seems the most suitable place, as there is already some discussion on the matter here. Oldelpaso 18:19, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Protection

message: #Support UEFA website admits here it is just a name change. Number 57 12:24, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey votes - Support integrating Inter Cities Fairs Cup results with UEFA Cup

message: #Oppose - The UEFA Cup, UEFA Cup finals, UEFA Cup records and statistics and European football records articles describe the competitions run by UEFA. UEFA did not run the Fairs Cup and does not consider their results part of clubs' European record as stated on their UEFA Cup: All-time finals page. And to illustrate the discrepancy between Wikipedia and UEFA: according to Wikipedia FC Barcelona has won three UEFA Cups , while UEFA mentions no UEFA (nor Fairs) Cup wins on their Barcelona page. -- BestEditorEver 12:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey votes - Oppose integrating Inter Cities Fairs Cup results with UEFA Cup

message: After a further checkuser, I have blocked User:Matrixbucra, User:Barryisland and User:Forza Deano as sockpuppets of User:Fadiga09 and informed him that any other use of accounts other than the main one will result in an indefinite block. Black Kite 00:50, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blocking of sockpuppets
Talk:Biblical cosmology

message: I made edit en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=875159557, but it was reverted with the reason "Not helpful grammatically or logically: a culture can't have a conception." I disagree. A culture includes religion, beliefs, and worldview (as described in the wiki article on Culture), so it would definitely include conceptions in the sense of ideas or beliefs, as it is used in the article summary. My edit was intended to reflect that it is impossible to know for certain how any ancient individuals believed (barring them saying so, and we can have a hard enough time even if they do, due to varying interpretations of what they said), but we can more accurately refer to the general beliefs of the cultures surrounding the origins of the Bible. This article seems to describe those cultures' beliefs with a few references to Biblical passages more than it describes the cosmology within the Bible itself (which admittedly has a lot of various and even conflicting interpretations), so the summary should accurately indicate that. If there is a better phrasing than I used, then that would be fine. - 173.59.126.228 (talk) 04:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia editors don't make the call, WP:SCHOLARSHIP makes the call. Tgeorgescu (talk) 04:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article summary edits
Talk:Gloria Steinem

message: I am concerned that this article might not meet the GA criteria anymore for the following reasons:
*The election support section stops at 2016, and does not comment on 2020 or the upcoming election. 
*There are many uncited sentences and paragraphs
*There are many short, one sentence paragraphs, especially in the Activism section
Is anyone interested in working on this article? If not, it might be sent to GAR. The user who nominated this article for GA status seems to have vanished so I don't know who to ping to notify them. Z1720 (talk) 17:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA concerns
Talk:Albert III, Duke of Saxony

message: Several other pages about "Albert, xxx of Saxony" have been redirected to this article.  Given the confusion and the number of Rulers of Saxony who bore the name Albert, I thought it might be appropriate to add a disambiguation notice at the top of the page.  Muriel Gottrop is concerned that this might interrupt the flow of the article and, frankly, I do not disagree.  Is the note helpful?  Is it in the right place?  Other thoughts? Rossami 14:14, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: We say 27 January.  I've always read he was born between 27th and 31st July.  --  JackofOz (talk) 08:57, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of birth
Talk:Avant-garde

message: I personally think the Example section of the article should be expanded. There are different forms of art (dance, painting/drawing, etc.) that are considered avant-garde and had a large effect on social mobility and the establishment of personal identity, especially in the 1960s as the mass culture industry expanded in America. Jenlynn1000 (talk) 17:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: But art movements in the sixties are outside of the scope of modernist avant-garde. In Spanish we call these the "vanguardias históricas", which points out their historical character in the watersheds of the twentieth century. 181.49.157.2 (talk) 13:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of Examples Section 

message: I've tagged this article with  as I'm concerned that material has been added that substantially misrepresents sources, but don't have the time or access to sources to investigate this further. I reverted edits to the paragraph on arrière-garde which made claims at odds with the sources (essentially claiming that arrière-garde means simply opposed to avant-garde rather than the more complex relationship posited by the sources), but these were part of a long string of edits, any number of which may contain similar misrepresentations. If anyone's confident that the material is largely accurate and faithful to the sources they should feel free to remove the tag. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Sadly I agree, and I think you were right to add it. In my opinion, there's a lot of original research in this article, and not necessarily of the best sort either—I get the feeling that someone read a variety of the cited texts here not very closely, and then wrote what they thought the texts said into the article, instead of just quoting from them or citing high-quality secondary sources that could put them into context more effectively. I think the article could do with more of both of those and less freewheeling characterization of what are essentially primary sources in this context. 🍉◜⠢◞ↂ🄜𝚎sₒᶜa𝚛🅟ම𛱘‎🥑《 𔑪‎talk〗⇤ 22:58, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disputed
Talk:Politics of Algeria

message: this is gay  by the coolest person is the worldthe Abdelaziz Bouteflika says that he is an independent, but one table here says that he is a national liberation front member and another says he is a National Rally for democracy member.  This seems like three different parties for the same person.  How is this possible? M i c 21:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Abdelaziz Bouteflika 

message: The government section of the "Outline of Algeria" needs to be checked, corrected, and completed -- especially the subsections for the government branches.
When the country outlines were created, temporary data (that matched most of the countries but not all) was used to speed up the process.  Those countries for which the temporary data does not match must be replaced with the correct information.
Please check that this country's outline is not in error.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact The Transhumanist .
Thank you.
i think that the lil things tht i have on the screeen really isnt working good aenoigh and ttht my computer loads very slowy it think it can do any thing on it onss stoome bt it has to  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.38.68.5 (talk) 19:13, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important notice 

message: The "informal power" section as well as the introductory section have huge neutrality problems. I think that in my opinion, it would be better to describe the actual political functioning as it is institutionalized and then comment on what political analysts think independent of any foreign ideological influence. Similarly, some data such as the constitutional revision of 2020 and the new electoral law are not taken into account. It is a mixture of data that is at least a decade old and modern touches here and there. Tarek lb (talk) 16:03, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem of neutrality
Talk:Some Girls Wander by Mistake

message: 1. The total output 80-83 are included here, except for Temple Of Love (7" version). It is the same recording as the 12" version, but is faded out where the 12" version stops in the middle. Meaning, it's not an edited version as such. 
2. This album was released in at least Canada where it reached at charted at no. 44 in June 1992 (proved by a chart book I have at home). Whether it was released in USA or not I have no idea. 
Stein S., Oslo, Norway  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.209.88.240 (talk) 16:32, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two things... 

message: What does that mean? How do you cancel something already published? Equinox (talk) 22:10, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Cancelled after being released"
Talk:Peter Hounam

message: Is this guy a British citizen? Stargoat 16:16, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, why? Get-back-world-respect 18:55, 27 May 2004 (UTC)

text: Had a go at correcting the grammar whilst keeping the content of the last bit. It wasn't bad as it was - the word "big" was wrong, and it needed some seperation of clauses. -- Gregg 02:16, 28 May 2004 (UTC)

text: Did it get broadcasted?64.168.29.106 22:43, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZZvTZAKgro  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.15.221 (talk) 11:43, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Youtube Documentary with Hounam 

message: Is there a reason more of this article is about Mordechai Vanunu than Peter Hounam? It seems to me most of this could be turned into a single para. Maury 21:54, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uhh, wrong article... 

message: I removed this:
totally unsourced, against BLP.87.194.213.98 (talk) 22:45, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  para removed from article
Talk:Index of articles related to motion pictures

message: A zillion entries up to letter H and then it nearly stops; did somebody lose interest?  Jgm 02:05, 30 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, yes. See this series of edits from June 2005. -- Quiddity (talk) 07:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  what happened here? 

message: In tracking shot, the shot is known as "a tracking shot, also known as a dolly" but dolly zoom uses the alternate name given in tracking shot for its name. Huh? -Gohst (talk) 22:26, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  dissimilarities
Talk:List of Western fiction authors

message: Deleted Otto Maria Carpeaux from this page since he is not a western fiction author but an author on "Western Civilization."— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.177.168.79 (talk) 17:12, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Copied from List of Western authors:
This is a list of some notable authors in the western fiction genre.
Note that some writers listed below have also written in other genres.
* Jack Ballas
* S. Omar Barker
* Max Brand (1892-1944), (Pseudonym of Frederick Schiller Faust)
* Peter Brandvold
* Matt Braun
* Otto Maria Carpeaux
* Walter van Tilburg Clark, (1909-1971)
* Ralph Compton, (1934-1999)
* James Fenimoore Cooper, (1789-1851)
* Barry Cord
* Ralph Cotton
* William R. Cox
* Peter Dawson (I), (Pseudonym of Jonathan Glidden)
* J.T. Edson
* Loren D. Estleman
* Tabor Evans
* Zane Grey, (1872-1939)
* A.B. Guthrie, Jr., (1901-1991)
* Will Henry
* Roy Hogan
* Terry C. Johnston, (1947-2001)
* William W. Johnstone
* E.Z.C. Judson (Pseudonym of Ned Buntline)
* Elmer Kelton, (born 1924)
* Elmore Leonard, (born 1925)
* Louis L'Amour, (1908-1988)
* Giles Lutz
* Larry McMurtry, (born 1936)
* Nelson Nye
* T.V. Olsen, (1932-1993)
* Lauran Paine
* Conrad Richter, (1890-1968)
* Jack Schaefer, (1907-1991)
* Luke Short, (1908-1975)(Pseudonym of Frederick D. Glidden)
* Charles G. West
* Richard S. Wheeler, (born 1935)
* Owen Wister, (1860-1938)
* Cormac McCarthy, (born 1933)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by EloraOntario (talk • contribs) 15:25, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * Western fiction
* Western movie
* List of authors—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark Richards (talk • contribs) 17:22, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: See also

message: Project Gutenberg lists mainly 19th century Western authors on its specialized Western books page: http://www.gutenberg.org/wiki/Western_%28Bookshelf%29
We did not have about half of these listed here. So, I went ahead and added the unlisted ones with the exception of Washington Irving. The work Irving is listed for (Astoria: Or, Anecdotes Of An Enterprise Beyond The Rocky Mountains) is indeed about the western frontier, but is history (and maybe also biography), not fiction. It's not even historical fiction. DanQuigley 18:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added Some 19th Century Authors 

message: The link to Elizabeth Butler is incorrect.
--Jblykins (talk) 00:06, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elizabeth Butler link 

message: Maximilianklein (talk) 00:02, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: WorldCat Genres
Talk:Sheriff of Nottingham (position)

message: OK, I realise there are many stories told about the Sheriff of Nottingham, but this page is starting to look like Sherrif of Nottingham in fiction with so many paragraphs about Robin Hood and even Disney cartoons.  
I'll try to lookup some more research, but just from the vaguest of memories and a few links:
* First sheriffs (1450) : William Sadler and Thomas Lyng 
* Current sheriff (2000): Councillor Derek Cresswell, Labour Party 
* There's a list of all the sheriffs on that page too
* There are two maces in Nottingham, from the time when there were two parish churches (I think this might have been a catholic/protestant thing)
* The whole "sheriff of nottingham was responsible for law-enforcement in the whole of northern england, all the way up to Yorkshire where robin hood lived" stories - perhaps someone can who's seen Tony Robinson's programme more recently than I can remember the details?
* The "date" of the various robin-hood stories has probably been debunked already, but it's worth checking that the Sheriff of Nottingham wasn't contemporary with either the Crusades, or the Lionheart for example
* Presumably some of the less savoury aspects of "the sheriff" might turn out to be opinion, we should be careful not to use retellings of a legend as a primary source here
Ojw 23:38, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you mean about most of the page being legend and fiction, but I think there's a reason why this page exists and, for instance, Sheriff of Oxford doesn't... Daibhid C 15:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  History or fiction 

message: For years the post has been directly appointed by the Lord Mayor ... How many years? Five? Fifty? Five hundred? ::Supergolden:: 13:22, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  For years... 

message: Why don't we do a seperate article on the Sheriff of Nottingham in Fiction? Then we could just keep a note in this article saying "The Sheriff of Nottingham was an arch-villain in the Robin Hood stories."
:For the same reason Nottingham still has the entirely-ceremonial post at all: it adds to the charm of the thing. Simesa 03:42, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible split

message: In the BBC "Robinhood" series, did Robin call the Sheriff by name near the end of the episode "Peace? Off!!"? I could swear he said "Vasily, with me" when they were fighting the assassins. 207.202.227.125 01:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the fictional Sheriff 

message: Please feel free to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Nottinghamshire and contribute whatever information you can. KlickingKarl (talk) 02:04, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Project Nottinghamshire

message: The page incorrectly listed Leon Unczur as the current sheriff which is incorrect - not helped by the fact that Nottingham City Council have not updated their page about the sheriff on their website. The current sheriff is Councillor Merlita Bryan as stated at http://www.nottinghamcity.gov.uk/index.aspx?articleid=3686 Flibblesan (talk) 20:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect details for current Sheriff (as of July 2012)
Talk:NATO bombing of Yugoslavia

message: The current title is biased and unnecessary highlights the bombing. All other interventions in wikipedia are named either by their operation name (like nato bombing of bosnian serbs) or simply named like “intervention”. The good title would be “NATO military intervention in Yugoslavia/Kosovo (1999)” This is how it is referred to in the majority of works. 91.230.41.206 (talk) 15:09, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: concur Lolipopm1995 (talk) 16:30, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome to start a rename discussion - but your proposed title sounds extremely euphemistic to me. The 'military intervention' took the form of an aerial bombing campaign, so why is it a problem to call it that? How is that biased? I ask that as someone who believed that the 'military intervention' was justified morally and relatively undestructive of life and property. You can't 'highlight the bombing', when the bombing campaign is all that happened at that time. Other roles, such as diplomacy and peacekeeping were earlier or later and are covered in other artioles. Pincrete (talk) 21:03, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename the article 

message: I'm doubtful that "illegal" belongs in the first sentence of the lead in Wikivoice, particularly when the legality is phrased as an open question in the bottom of the lead, and we don't make definitive statements in the article body (c.f. WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY). There's a whole article on this exact sort of question. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 15:36, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Special:Diff/1195097722|"Illegal"]]
Talk:Murder of Gwen Araujo

message: There's been some back-and-forth editing of the birth date, between "October 4" and "February 24", and I'm having trouble figuring out which date (if either!) is right. The cited obituary does say "February 24, 1985". OTOH, Tess deCarlo's Trans History (), page 245, has "February 21st, 1985", while Lillian Faderman's Great Events from History: Gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender events, 1848-2006, page 696, has "February 4, 1985". Possibly the specific date is not necessary and we could just say "1985". -sche (talk) 18:35, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Considering that no source says she was born on October 4, and it's coincidentally the same date she was killed, I think we can safely assume that the IP editor is confused and incorrect. If the sources conflict, but all agree on the month, there's no reason we can't say "February 1985". -Jason A. Quest (talk) 19:00, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date 

message: I know what it is but won't mention it here. Why is this information unavailable. Is this per Wiki policy? (166.155.87.202 (talk) 14:23, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there no mention of her birth name?
Talk:Motion for more definite statement

message: In response to notes below and this article, there seems to be a number of factual issues with this article.  It may be advantageous for a licensed attorney to review.  Among the potential issues:
e
1.  "...means of obtaining a more detailed motion from the opposing party..." - I am not clear if there are instances in which a motion for a more definitive statement ever pertains to another motion.  I believe in most jurisdictions, an issue of lack of clarity with a motion would be handled via an objection to a motion.  Generally, I think the motion for a more definitive statement pertains to a complaint -- i.e. a responsive item filed instead of and in advance of an answer to a complaint.
2.  "The presiding judge will respond..." -- I am unclear why it is asserted a presiding judge would be the one to respond.  My understanding is this would generally be handled by the judge assigned to a case.
In case the earlier talk comments pertain to the existing bulk of this article (and not earlier version), it appears this article pertains to the United States.  The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure specifically refer to actions in federal courts.  Most states, if not all, have their own rules of civil procedures for district courts of the state, that are based substantially on the federal rules of civil procedure.  However, an action in a state court would not follow the federal rules; it would follow the specific rules for the district court.  So, for example, an action in the Third Judicial District Court (state) for Utah (including Salt Lake County) would follow the Utah Rules for Civil Procedure.
Uberveritas (talk) 16:46, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I assumed that in the US. The article mention Federal code of procedure. And what other editor would not bother to enter a country? Przepla 14:43, 19 Sep 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Französisches Gymnasium Berlin

message: The singling out of Brauchitsch as an alumnus in the lead is downright bizarre. If there are no objections I'll remove his name from the lead. Norvo (talk) 02:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: As nobody has stated any reason for singling out Brauchitsch I have removed his name from the lead. Norvo (talk) 00:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is Brauchitsch singled out? 
Talk:Skalla-Grímr

message: I wrote this article somewhat tongue-in-cheek. Feel free to delete it, if you think it is too trivial for inclusion in the Wikipedia. Then again, we have separate articles for the entire Simpson family, so why not keep Skalla-Grímur? Io 20:59, 27 May 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Article created

message: I'm going to change all the names back to their Norse form, as it is better to be consistent.  Thanks, JG 28 (talk) 12:32, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Norse vs. English endings
Talk:Wonder What's Next

message: *All song titles serve as redirects to this album, have their own pages, or have been placed at the appropriate disambiguation pages.--Hraefen Talk 19:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: '''<^>v!!This album is connected!!v<^>'''

message: --164.58.27.93 (talk) 15:28, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: A reliable source should be provided for whatever genres are present. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:47, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Metal
Talk:Transplants (album)

message: If you listen to the album from the Rhapsody website or software the song titled usually "One Seventeen" is called "On Point."  This could be worth mentioning. Atherva (talk) 04:13, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled