Talk:Australian Aboriginal culture

message: Australian Aboriginal culture → Indigenous Australian culture — See explanation Zarbat 10:54, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 

message: Add  * Support  or  * Oppose  on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
*Support. Zarbat 10:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: Add any additional comments:
* please have a look at Zarbat's  before engaging in this. possible single issue trouble-maker?
* also hexagon's I've never heard/seen the phrase "Indigenous Australians" being commonly used for the aboriginals in my life" would seem to indicate a complete lack of knowledge of this issue. this is not an exageration. the "only common term claim" is simply false. anyone unfamiliar with subject, please proceed w/ caution → bsnowball 09:00, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion

message: No consensus for move. I suggest that Zarbat gets more people supporting him, maybe he can solicit the Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board. / Fred-Chess 08:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conclusion 

message: The ABS website
:BACKGROUND INFORMATION - WHO IS INDIGENOUS?
:WHAT IS THE MEANING OF INDIGENOUS?
:In Australia the term Indigenous is used to refer to both Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Therefore, officially Australia has two groups of Indigenous people...
Paul foord 13:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ABS definition of Indigenous (and it is capitalised)

message: :Image:Aboriginal art memorial at the NGA.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:17, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Aboriginal art memorial at the NGA.JPG

message: ", and it is claimed to be the world's oldest wind instrument" contains a canonical example of Wikipedia weasel words: "is claimed to be". Claimed by who? In addition, the Didgeridoo page says the earliest evidence for a didgeridoo is 1,500 years ago, while the Flute page says the earliest extant flute is, at least, 38,000 years old, more than 25 times older. So I removed the quoted phrase from the article. Nick Beeson (talk) 18:28, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed weasel words 

message: On a photograph in a museum exhibition about Aboriginal art 'X is in this picture'; at the entrance to another such exhibition a text informing people of Aboriginal culture/inheritance that there are images of persons of that grouping since deceased. What is the belief system behind this? 86.153.166.25 (talk) 21:51, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Australian Aboriginal avoidance practices#Avoidance of naming the dead. Mitch Ames (talk) 11:39, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: So 'a significantly old film' would not be considered an issue on this ground (but might raise issues of being culturally patronising)?
Most people would wish to avoid causing accidental offence'/be generally courteous and cooperative. 193.132.104.10 (talk) 14:35, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Cultural question

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Australian Aboriginal culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130617020837/http://www.academia.edu:80/346473/Australian_Game_Australian_Identity to http://academia.edu/346473/Australian_Game_Australian_Identity
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:03, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Australian Aboriginal culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080514032921/http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FmorleyEC.htm to http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FmorleyEC.htm
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://academia.edu/346473/Australian_Game_Australian_Identity
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160330114112/http://arts.adelaide.edu.au/linguistics/guide.pdf to https://arts.adelaide.edu.au/linguistics/guide.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have posted this comment on several pages which describe Aboriginal culture, because my comment is relevant to each of these pages: As a hobby I read extensively on Indigenous cultures around the world - a fascinating subject. I have a large library as a result. This article has huge amounts missing in terms of description of Aboriginal life pre-colonisation, a subject which is of great interest to many people. Books on this from the 1800s to 1900s are abundant and easy to access (Tom Petrie, William Buckley, Douglas Lockwood etc.), and some tribes in Australia still practice culture (Martu people of WA, Yolngu of NT etc.). PDFs of Yolngu law as it has been practiced for 1000s of years has been written down by the elders for the broader public to understand, and is easy to access with a google search. Is there any particular reason for for leaving out large amounts of easy to find facts and information on this subject?Alabama81bornandbred (talk) 10:16, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I fear I have found this comment some 5+ years too late for you to see a response, but I think you or anyone else who has an extensive database on a topic would be doing a great service to people who are not as informed as you by adding information, yourself. It may be daunting at first, but you or anyone reading this comment who does not have the history of wikipedia-editing should read about how to (and generally what info to add), and add what you see fit.  It can be fun and rewarding, and you can know that you are helping others find information. La rodman (talk) 02:40, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Missing Elements