Talk:Nannerl Notenbuch

message: Might it be better to describe all of these Mozart works in this article rather than giving them each an article of their own? They're all quite short (as far as I know) and uninteresting (well, them being the first things WAM wrote gives them some interest, I guess, but musically they're nothing), and having an article on each would mean quite a lot of duplication.
:I don't think there is anything per se wrong with small articles, and it makes it easier to refer to the pieces in other articles. — Stumps 13:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've moved it to Nannerl Notenbuch which is the name used in many sources, such as the Cambridge Mozart Encyclopedia and Grove's. — Stumps 13:05, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Copied from old article ... Nannerl's Music Book

message: I merged six child articles (K1a-K1f) in and copied the text in as subsections.  Feel free to clean it up more if the merge reads awkwardly here.  There's still six pieces that could use a short blurb (K2-K5b).  I know K2 is fairly well-known because it shows up in several learning books (e.g. Bastien, Suzuki). DavidRF (talk) 02:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merged in Child articles 

message: I am not sure the previous sentence is true, though I suppose it is possible.  The work of Johann Sebastian Bach was not well known, nor well respected, by the general musical community until the early 19th century, after Mozart's death (wikipedia, prior knowledge), though Mozart himself refers to the work of "Sebastian Bach" with respect and what I perceived as a revelatory tone in a letter to his father. (I think the letter was from the late 1770's or early 1780's.  I know I'm not citing my sources; that's why I'm not editing the article.) His references to "Bach" prior to this letter are generally thought to refer to Johann Christian Bach, who was popular at the time.  Furthermore, the only Bach whose work is present in the Nannerl Notebook, according to wikipedia's page about it, is Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach; of course, this does not mean J.S. wasn't on their radar.  Leopold was deputy kapellmeister in 1763, and had been in the service of the Prince-Archbishop of Salzburg for some time; perhaps there was an extensive musical library to which he might have had access.  I do not know.  I simply wanted to draw attention to this claim, as it is uncited and seemed unlikely to me. 
Summary/thesis/conclusion:
The statement "It is clearly influenced by the work of Johann Sebastian Bach," seems bold and unfounded, is uncited, is a statement of interpretation, and seems to imply that Sebastian Bach had a particular impact on the young Mozart, whereas I imagine J.S. Bach, our favorite Bach, obscure then, was merely one (if one at all) of many baroque composers whose works, blended into an idea or sense of the style, inspired this little minuet, written by a five-year old boy.  ~~bakapupil~~
(Comment added by DavidRF for User:Bakapupil).DavidRF (talk) 16:11, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bach's influence on Nannerl Notenbuch? 

message: K1f is also a protein family involved in stem cell self renewal! Is there somebody who's able to make a disambiguation page?--87.7.122.156 (talk) 23:00, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Which Wikpedia page describes the protein family? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 03:13, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: K1f proteins

message: I've found no references elsewhere of a daughter to Mozart called "Nannerl". Wasn't Nannerl his sister? see 
--Sgriosair (talk) 16:25, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The article identifies Nannerl as Leopold Mozart's daughter, not Wolfgang's. Eroica (talk) 15:21, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sister or Daughter?