lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Emerico di Quart

message: These are the name variants I have come up with so far.
Amato Pietro Frutaz, Le fonti per la storia della Valle d'Aosta, Thesaurus Ecclesiarum Italiae1 (Rome: 1966), p.303  offers five variants: ‘Emerico I di Quart’; ‘Emericus, (or Hemericus or Eymericus) de Quarto’; ‘Emeric de Quart’.
The less scholarly Duemila anni di santità in Piemonte e Valle d'Aosta, ed. by (Cantalupa: Effattà, 2001), p.200, which treats ‘Emeric’ as the primary form, adds also ‘Emerio’.
Philippe Raguin, Nicole Sauty, Les prénoms chrétiens (Paris: Mediaspaul Editions, 1999), p.126 (which gives an incorrect year of death) uses ‘[Bienheureux] Émeric’.
The accentless form Emeric, however, seems widely used in French references to the bishop. It is the form used by Joseph-Antoine Besson in his Mémoires pour l'histoire ecclésiastique des diocèses de Genève, Tarantaise, Aoste et Maurienne et du décanat de Savoye of 1759  and also in the current Dictionnaire historique de la Suisse describes Aymon de Quart as ‘frère d'Emeric, évêque d'Aoste’ (1301-1313) .
Ferdinand de Lasteyrie, Le cathédrale d'Aoste: étude archéologique, Etudes archéologiques sur les églises des Alpes, 1 (Paris: Victor Didron, 1854), pp. 17–18 (who admittedly seems to confuse or conflate the two Bishops of Aosta called Emeric of Quart) offers ‘Eymeric de Quart’, as an alternative to Emeric, and transcribes a Latin inscription of 1496 [perhaps an error for 1498] which gives a source for ‘Emericus de Quarto’.
I can still find no reference for Héméric, but perhaps Simoncik84 will be able to supply one.
No doubt all of these forms of the name should be mentioned in the article, but the question which remains is which should be used as its title? What is this beatus normally called in English? Butler's Lives of the Saints uses the Latin form ’Emericus de Quart’ [shouldn’t that be de Quarto?], while The Book of Saints by the Benedictines of St. Augustine’s Abbey, Ramsgate uses the accentless French form ‘Emeric’. For what it’s worth, Samuel William King, The Italian Valleys of the Pennine Alps: A Tour through all the Romantic and less Frequented ‘Vals’ of Northern Piedmont, from the Tarentaise to the Gries (London:John Murray, 1858) p. 116uses ‘Emeric de Quart’. —Ian Spackman (talk) 07:19, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I apologize, I made a mistake. The most spread name is "Éméric de Quart", not "Héméric". I think that this version could be suitable, or the one in latin. The one in Italian is only an adaptation, and for wikipedia the original version should be prefered. --Simoncik84 (talk) 08:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Alternative names
Talk:A Spaceman Came Travelling

message: It would be good if the narrative of the song was summarised. --Dweller (talk) 15:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot 

message: Did this song ever offend the Pope or any one like that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.144.140 (talk) 23:27, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Controversy?

message: Just wondering, there is a lot more detail on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christmas_music. Apparently de Burgh was broke and staying at a friend's house (the old story of musicians!) when he read Erik von Daniken's "Chariot of the Gods", mixed it with some ideas from Yeats, and got this wonderful record.
Here is one 'source': http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-12049738
What do people think?--92.19.179.200 (talk) 19:57, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, good spot. I've just added it word-for-word at the moment - the article may need a slight rewording though. TubularWorld (talk) 20:08, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: More detail?

message: The coverversion of Mandaryna probably wasn't in the German charts at all and I fear it was only placed ad 32 in Poland.
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandarynkowy_sen)
(http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandaryna)
I have no idea where to find sources we can trust in...  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tranfunsel (talk • contribs) 20:32, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charts may be wrong 

message: The second line says "'Twas light years of time since his mission did start" - ouch!MarkRae (talk) 18:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's obviously technically inaccurate, but that's no excuse for your daft "Chris de Burgh obviously doesn't know much about physics" edit. Smurfmeister (talk) 11:04, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Light years of time 
Talk:Beowulf: The Game

message: what is this? there is no point to this. someone needs to fix it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.186.212.115 (talk) 05:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

message: I've cleaned up most of the article, but there are still things that could use improving. More references.--EclipseSSD (talk) 18:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: What about adding system requirements in the info box?
EaswarH (talk) 04:22, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: I've not played this game in any format, but this article is written in an extremely non POV way. Douglasnicol (talk) 21:36, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Non POV
Talk:Frattini's argument

message: The last line: NH(P) ≤ NG(P) ≤ M so M = H seems to unnecessarily include it's 1st expression NH(P) as it is not used by the proof.  It only confuses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.180.4.184 (talk • contribs) 
:It seems to me N_H(P) is needed. The goal of that part is to get that N_H(P) <= M, so that M <= H = N_H(P) M <= MM = M, so M = H.  I expanded the proof a little to make it clearer how each part is used. JackSchmidt (talk) 14:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about proof

message: There are severe problems with the capitalization in the proof, with lower case letters sometimes referring to groups and subgroups and upper case letters sometimes referring to group elements, and there isn't even consistency when referring to the same variable.  One sentence even reads "Let G be an element of G".  Groups and subgroups should be capitalized, group elements should not.  I'm not going to make the change out of fear that someone will just undo it, but whoever has taken stewardship of the page should definitely make the correction. 
216.80.125.44 (talk) 12:21, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Capitalization in the proof
Talk:2007 Supercheap Auto Bathurst 1000

message: Gurr and Tander did not retire on the same lap, they recorded the same number of laps, but looking at the timing, Tander retired some forty minutes earlier than Gurr, saying the incidents were related is just plain wrong. --Falcadore (talk) 10:22, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accuracy issues
Talk:Economic terrorism

message: Se você quiser incluir a tradução deste artigo pequeno como uma subseção do artigo que tu tás construindo, fique a vontade. 2804:14C:5BB3:A319:6DE4:769C:E596:6A8 (talk) 16:53, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  {{Ping|Luizpuodzius}}
Talk:Rosa Vercellana

message: Well, the name is probably right, though I think the article should be moved to Rosa Vercellana (not Vercellona). Actually, Teresa seems to be just one of her baptismal names, while Guerrieri is the surname of convenience given by King Victor Emmanuel II to his illegitimate children. Since this person is best known as Rosa Vercellana, if nobody minds, I will move the page within a reasonable time. Thank you. --Erinaceus (talk) 14:24, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes! I’d say a reasonable time to wait would be a short one. —Ian Spackman (talk) 09:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I just moved it. Fine job with references! Bye, --Erinaceus (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Three-star rank

message: The following comment was copied from my talk page for completeness:
:The length of the picture of the Indian Air Marshal creates white space issues. On-the-other-hand, the extra length includes the medals & ribbons. (i.e. worth having.)
:I like the pictures on the right edge rather than in a gallery at the bottom.
:What do you think? Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. In the short term, cropping the ribbons was the easier alternative! Pdfpdf (talk) 12:35, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images 

message: This article appears to contain an error common to many articles, see Talk:Five-star rank#Other affected articles and the discussion that immediately precedes it. Andrewa (talk) 01:13, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Related discussion 

message: I removed the comment "Vice Admiral has been a three-star rank in the Royal Navy since 2001", which referred to UK DCI (Joint Service) 125/2001.  The rank of vice admiral has always been a 3-star rank (at least since the "starred rank" system first evolved).  What DCI (JS) 125/2001 did was to change the insignia for a UK vice admiral (and indeed the other UK admirals) so that their shoulder boards (worn only with tropical uniforms) came into line with the insignia of British Army generals, thus reducing confusion in the rare cases that an army and navy 3-star stood next to each other in tropical uniform.  Not that I was confused before hand, either. Shem (talk) 15:43, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: UK vice admiral
Talk:Spruille Braden

message: Previous editor said subject died of Lyme disease.  Obits said heart ailment, and family was surprised to read of Lyme disease (I am grandson of subject).  I have changed it back to heart ailment, but if anyone has any kind of reference supporting the Lyme thing, I'd welcome hearing about it.  William Braden (wbraden@cox.net)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Doc bee (talk • contribs) 18:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Talk:Vittorio Sgarbi

message: The English in this article is of an extremely poor quality, and almost sounds like a babelfish translation of something written in Italian. There are also some fairly extreme points of view expressed regarding the subject of the article, and these need to be addressed. Safebreaker (talk) 22:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I have added the biography section, translated from Italian wiki. It is not simply a babelfish translation - I have done my best with the English, but translations of certain terms, such as the title "soprintendenza ai beni storici e artistici" which Sgarbi held in Veneto, are problematic. The lengthy quotation is especially problematic. BartBassist (talk) 03:11, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Standard of English

message: I removed the long biographical section, added by Strauss12 at 19:02, 13 December 2012, which seemed to meet all the criteria for immediate removal. It was badly written, unreferenced, largely unverifiable and potentially libellous. It was also unwikified. 
This article has always lacked references (no more than two or three at the most). It has in the past veered to & fro between a stub and a fairly long article (deleted by NuclearWarfare at 17:21, 27 February 2011), which was at least well sprinkled with wikilinks. It seems to attract controversy.
The extraordinary list of publications is unformatted and pretty useless in its current form, but I'm leaving it at the moment. Such a long list, added anonymously (by 98.113.150.107 at 20:00, 9 October 2012), seems redolent of vanity publishing? SiGarb | (Talk) 17:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographical content
Talk:292nd Infantry Division (Wehrmacht)

message: I've just looked at this article, having followed the link from the Project Page.  I do not agree that it needs attention because of major grammatical errors.  While the article could well be amplified, I cannot find anything wrong with the grammar, and recommend that the note above should be changed to "yes". Mikeo1938 (talk) 11:10, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment re Grammar
Talk:Jekabs Kulis

message: RECOMMEND FOR DELETION
I intend to recommend this page for deletion, unless anyone has any objection. Kulis is only notable for the role he played in the story of Alex Kurzem, and the page on Kurzem details that role adequately. Indeed, this page contains no information that is not already present on the Kurzem page. Any objections?
176thWingPublicAffairs (talk) 05:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Abraham Wheelocke

message: I suspected at least one kind of error in this passage:
In 1632 he oversaw the transfer of Thomas van Erpe's collection of oriental books and manuscripts to Cambridge University Library after its purchase by George Villiers, which brought with it the collection's first book in Chinese.
I have realized the phraseology was misleading as it implied the Duke of Buckingham to whom the name was wikilinked was alive in 1632 when he had been murdered in 1628, 4 years after Van Erpe's death. I have rephrased the package to clarify the detail.Cloptonson (talk) 12:58, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Detail under section 'Librarian'
Talk:Lambda Revolt

message: Half of the battles are undescribed. Expansion please?82.32.210.118 (talk) 11:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: That's what the notice on the article's head is for. It shouldn't take too long for someone to come around and expand the whole thing. --Bruin_rrss23 (talk) 13:50, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Need of expansion

message: This article would be great if it had ANY citations at all, especially if all of those specific figures are used. Ub3rn008 (talk) 09:16, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation
Talk:Killing of Randolph Evans

message: Having voted in support of "Death of Randolph Evans" as the article's main title header, I should note that had the nomination proposed Killing of Randolph Evans or Murder of Randolph Evans, I would have also supported those. The accused officer was indicted and tried on the charge of "second-degree murder" and was found "not guilty by reason of insanity", thus sustaining the use of the other two proposed titles. The concurrent nomination Murder of Deborah Gardner → Killing of Deborah Gardner, in which the perpetrator was also found "not guilty by reason of insanity", presents a different combination of circumstances, but a similar verdict. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 15:07, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment upon above "Requested move 28 September 2016"

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 20:07, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Shooting of Randolph Evans →  – Per WP:Deaths. Inexpiable (talk) 12:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

text: if going by the flowchart, shouldn't it be 'Murder of'? – robertsky (talk) 16:43, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: oh.. The not guilty finding.... Support then. – robertsky (talk) 16:44, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 17 January 2024
Talk:2007 Football League Championship play-off final

message: The article name is still wrong. It should be "Football League Championship" not "Football League". Also, I'm wondering if playoff should be hyphenated or not (it currently isn't). Both soccerbase and the front of the match programme use the hyphen, but I think the correct English spelling should prevail, whatever it may be. --Jameboy (talk) 13:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: I've moved the page per this consensus. (addition of hyphen) --Jameboy (talk) 11:58, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: *Guardian as-it
*Guardian rep
*BBC as-it
*BBC rep
The Rambling Man (Stay indoors, stay safe!!!!) 08:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources
Talk:CNC VTL

message: This page was deleted 20 minutes ago, I believe. Additionally, be sure to wait for someone to request Speedy Deletion before adding hangon, and then (once you've added hangon) be sure and post a reason in the talk page of the article, which is this page. -- KingNewbs (talk) 12:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have removed the WikiProject tag, as this article is either a redirect or deleted. If you oppose, please restore the tag. Thank you, fahadsadah (talk,contribs) 16:10, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikiproject Computing
Talk:Liddesdale

message: needs some edits to ride page of rubbish 99.240.156.209 (talk) 03:59, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  No citations and rambling on about wind farms 
Talk:Model selection

message: The Criteria section has a template suggesting the list might be better presented as prose. - That might not be helpful. Perhaps an introductory paragraph, or some way (sublists ?) of grouping similar criteria ? If some of the criteria are motivated by, or used in, particular fields we could mention that.  Should we retitle this section as Model evaluation criteria to make it clearer ? - Rod57 (talk) 09:45, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criteria section - prose  ? 

message: Is the curve fitting or parameter estimation part of model selection or a separate step ? and are we only discussing regression models here ? - Rod57 (talk) 09:58, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Does selection include fitting or estimating
Template talk:Article history/Deprecation

message: It strikes me that , when used correctly, deprecates a lot of templates:
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*	
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
And probably a fair few others.  I'm not at all inclined to miss them - they're cumbersome, take up a huge quantity of space at the top of talk pages (the existence of  indicates we put too much on the top of talk pages) and aren't nearly as easily machine-readable as .  Given that we now have a robust and compact way of listing all these article milestones, doesn't it make sense to deprecate all these templates?  I suspect there are three schools of thought:
#These templates should be deprecated, a bot should convert all instances of the templates into , and the templates should then be deleted.
#These templates should be deprecated and a bot should convert all instances of the templates into .  However, they should not be deleted.  New instances of the templates should be converted by the same bot.  
#The templates should not be deprecated.
Of course I have no doubt someone will find an alternative viewpoint :D.  Note that , , , etc, are not on the list, as they cannot be incorporated into .  Discussion, please.  Happy‑melon 12:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note, some previous comments can be found here. Geometry guy 12:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
Talk:John Ernest I, Duke of Saxe-Weimar

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 05:18, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: This article has been reverted by a bot to  as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 12:46, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Bari, India

message: Note:  Project Banner with Rajasthan workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Rajasthan or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 06:27, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Rajasthan workgroup Addition
Talk:Operation Hush

message: I'd like to add the bit in here about the Belgian architect. Can we do that? Yes, it's here, 'Men, Ideas and Tanks' J.P. Harris (1995).Keith-264 (talk) 20:50, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quotations from interweb sources (copyright and attribution) 

message: Had a dash at the layout to conform to the 3rd Ypres pages.Keith-264 (talk) 21:17, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision 

message: I've found a bit more material but the sources are rather inconsistent about German units, so I'm not certain about the unit numbers and titles, did Marine Corps Flanders really have three brigades and three divisions?Keith-264 (talk) 12:43, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I think I've sorted out the German unit names and numbers and that the article is ready for review but a copy-edit would be appreciated first, thanks.Keith-264 (talk) 18:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision 

message: Battle of the YserKeith-264 (talk) 21:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  old map 
Talk:Fleet Satellite Communications System

message: When someone has a chance, we should integrate information from this Wired article:  --ChrisRuvolo (t) 15:09, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Does that work for you? --198.199.189.5 (talk) 19:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: FLTSAT-8 pirate radio use
Talk:Rajam

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: Moved: While there hasn't been that much discussion, this has already been relisted twice so I don't see the point in relisting it again. A rough consensus has developed that due to the lack of a dab page, and being the only article on Wikipedia with the proposed name (apart from the constituency which is named after the town), the article should be moved. (non-admin closure)  Spekkios (talk) 23:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Rajam, Andhra Pradesh →  – Unnecessary disamb — DaxServer (t · m · c) 12:45, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

text: This is a contested technical request (permalink). GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:59, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

text: Forgot about it then, but thanks for reminding me! — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:08, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 May 2022