lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Prestige Records

message: Does anyone out there have any objections to a semi-chronological or alphabetical list of albums released by Prestige? It's obviously a long-term project but of interest to get things into perspective. 83.191.68.209 14:51, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been done here. Beware, this site is not 100% accurate. Philip Cross 19:06, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prestige album listing 

message: Miles Davis was as critical of Weinstock's business practices as anyone else.  According to Davis, musicians tolerated them because Weinstock offered quick cash and made few immediate demands on musicians, although the overall return for musicians recording for Prestige was poor.  Among the unflattering handles for Prestige that gained currency among musicians were "the plantation" and "the junkie label," the latter because of the tendency of addicted musicians to be looking for quick cash to support their habit.  A lot of the musicians who recorded for Prestige in the 1950s were in fact addicted and sometimes they were in no condition to record.  The artistic freedom offered by Weinstock and his distaste for repeated takes lent a spontaneous quality to the recordings, although the quality of released tracks was famously erratic.  Musicians' opinions of Prestige may also reflect unpleasant memories of addiction in general.  The reference to Miles Davis defending Weinstock's business practices will be deleted.  I may add the other information after I dig out Davis' book to cite it properly.75.111.54.141 (talk) 18:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Business practices 

message: Since New Jazz Records redirects here, it would make sense to include information on that label. My understanding is that New Jazz started in 1949 before being renamed to Prestige, and this is mentioned on the Bob Weinstock page. Later the New Jazz name was used again as a sub-label for Prestige. According to Discogs, Prestige also had another 20 or so sub-labels, which would be worth mentioning.--Jimmyjrg (talk) 01:54, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Jazz Records - article expansion
Template talk:Blind Guardian

message: Should the guest musician Oliver Holzwarth be included in this template?--Bahamut 14:54, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Surely, the man who plays bass for BG for TEN years should be included, though in the second row.Garret Beaumain (talk) 11:00, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  second row? along with other ex-members? :S --PrimEviL 18:23, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The guest musician bassist Olivwer Holzwath
Talk:Ama (ayurveda)

message: Ama should be merged with the Ayurveda and it is a good idea, but merging Ayurveda in Ama is looking foolish.
user:Debbe, 18 November 2006, 03:00 UTC
:Why should Ama be merged into Ayurveda after all? It's an important concept, and Ayurveda is a long article already. Anyways, it hasn't since November, so I'm taking dow nthe merge tag. Karol 19:52, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: im pretty sure that the whole practise of ayurveda is to remove ama=toxins from the individual or using preventive actions/methods so that ama=toxins dosent build up in the individual, so becuse of that i think that an ama section as well as other important ayurvedic facts should be included in the ayurveda article --85.228.179.171 (talk) 13:25, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I absolutely agree with this fact! Abhijeet Safai 17:47, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ama
Talk:Boston Municipal Protective Services

message: Thanks to BD2412 for what I think was a very sensible close. But I would just like to strongly suggest someone does not edit Seat of local government as described in the close, unless he or she can back it up with good sourcing. Most city halls have security forces? Says who? There are some pretty tiny cities out there. --BDD (talk) 18:41, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course, any addition should be sourced. I would also point out that a city hall need not have a dedicated "security force" to have "security" of some kind. bd2412 T 18:51, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Post-move comments
Talk:God's Property

message: Disagree.  I knew nothing about this band before running across the reference in Jessica Simpson.  Yet as I look through Wikipedia, I found now that this album won for NAACP Image Award for Outstanding Gospel Artist in 1998.  That hardly seems to me to indicate it should be Speedy Deleted.  And, this was just the first link I ran across as I tried to begin enmeshing this article into the fabric of Wikipedia.  All the references remain unclear to me whether this is a band or an album.  Some indicate it is band and some indicate it is an album, which I believe argues even more for the article to remain.  As I said, I don't care one iota about this issue other than in my interest to build linkages in Wikipedia.  If it goes, it goes but this issue seems to be at the crossroads of quite a few articles in Wikipedia.   Theflyer 15:09, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: On 18 November, an editor added to the Early life section of the Jessica Simpson page that she toured with God's Property in 2004.  My research so far has not been able to rectify this conflict between a winning album in 1998 and a band touring in 2004.  Theflyer 15:19, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

text: More on the conflict. As an example, the Kirk Franklin page lists God's Property as an album but the Grammy Award for Best Gospel Choir or Chorus Album lists it like this "Myron Butler, Kirk Franklin & Robert Searight II (choir directors) for God's Property From Kirk Franklin's Nu Nation performed by God's Property".   This article could definitely help clarify and resolve these inconsistencies throughout Wikipedia.  Theflyer 15:36, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Speedy Deletion
Talk:Massachusetts Port Authority

message: Other services section on police references a now dead WBZ link [8].  How about referencing the Chapter and Section of MGL that gives jurisdiction to MSP.  129.83.31.1 (talk) 14:10, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Talk:Cauchy's equation

message: DISAMBIGUATION: Cauchy's equation can also refer to a functional equation of form
find f(x,y) for all x,y \in N such that
f(x)+f(y) = f(x+y)
Solution is f(x) = k x. This can be expanded by construction to sets Z and Q.
However, in reals additional requirements for the sole simple solution are for example one of the following:
* there exists a finite interval, where f is bounded
* in every finite interval, f is bounded
* f is continuous
* f is Lipschitz-continuous
* f'(x) exists for all x \in R
Proofs for these can be found in standard literature.
(post above me is unsigned)
Cauchy's equation is just a polynomial if written in terms of frequency. Why is fitting a polynomial special?
134.60.166.4 (talk) 16:25, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Because it is useful and reasonably accurate. Moreover, this 'fitting polynomial' can now be derived from a more correct theory. Nerd271 (talk) 21:14, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Cauchy equations

message: The article conflicted with something I thought and so I checked out the textbook it cites. The textbook  which is the reference for this
A: Defines the equation slightly differently (A+B/lambda squared + ...)
B: Does not have the table of coefficients for common material properties
C: Defines wavelength in angstroms. The standard in the field *is* to use microns, but this textbook it cite neither uses it, nor discusses it.
I use the cauchy equation every day in my research (and came here in response to a debate on the units of B/C). While the table defining B with units of microns does vindivate me, the source of the article does not. Other than the source being inaccurate, and weirdly starting at B for the sum, I agree with everything in this article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schumi23 (talk • contribs) 00:10, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article unsupported by source
Talk:Muslim Student Followers of the Imam's Line

message: Ayatollah Khomeini had ordered the embassy takeover to retaliate against the U.S. allowing Shah to enter the U.S. on 15 October 1979 for medical treatment.--Patchouli 15:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that Khomeini did not truly order the kidnapings and embassy takeover, but he did encourage the militants to do so.  He made a sort of "implied" order that the embassy be taken over, or at least that something large be done against America to protest their allowance of the former Shah into the U.S. for cancer treatment.  Ungoliantii 21:18, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is your own idea and against WP:OR. You can see the history of ths event in Ebtekar's book.--Sa.vakilian 11:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Islamic Republic account
Talk:John-Baptiste Nguyễn Bửu Đồng

message: Somebody please post his picture. I've got to go take the dogs for a walk.
J.
"Correction POV and pointlessly racist comments."
Please know what you're talking about before you make absurd statments like this.
Mister Jinxy 04:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Need full name. Badagnani (talk) 03:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Full name
Talk:MEO Sudoeste

message: Estas sao muito mauzinhas...(these ones really suck!)
Hasta!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luis v silva (talk • contribs) 07:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Can we get better photos ?
Talk:Stoughton, Leicestershire

message: I've just been there, the church looks old and there are gravestones dating back to 1707 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.3.50.60 (talk) 15:35, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Pennbury did not go ahead. Shouldn't this paragraph be dropped? It is now 2018.
Another question: Protusion or protrusion? I always thought things protruded, not protuded.
Many thanks in advance for considering my suggestions.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oldontarian (talk • contribs) 09:53, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pennbury
Talk:Neutering

message: This article seems to favour an American/USA bias in the information presented. It should be remembered that EN Wikipedia is for English speaking regions of which Northern America is only a part. It is suggested that someone with more knowledge than I, expand the article to cover other countries preferred surgical methods etc. Jaruzel (talk) 08:28, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  American Bias? 

message: It would be nice to have some information on the history of these techniques. Castration of males goes back quite far in history since it is fairly easy to get at the testicles and they can be removed without great risk of injury. Spaying of females, on the other hand, is surgically a much bigger deal, and therefore presumably has been done only fairly recently. It would be interesting to see some discussion of these issues.Bill (talk) 00:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: The redirect Entire (animal) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  𝔏𝔲𝔫𝔞𝔪𝔞𝔫𝔫🌙🌙🌙 𝔗𝔥𝔢 𝔐𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔬𝔫𝔦𝔢𝔰𝔱 (talk) 21:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Entire (animal)]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Effigia

message: Why does a reference to the Colbert Report take up roughly half of the description for Effigia okeeffeae? 204.112.156.246 15:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

message: One of the major differences that popped out to Sterling Nesbitt(I've met him before) between Coelophysis and Effigea that helped him identify the animal was the ankle. I don't know how you guys want to put this in, but this info should be displayed in the page. Paleo Kid (talk) 18:16, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The article's taxobox already notes that Effigia is a crurotarsan, so the difference is kind of implicit in that. Abyssal (talk) 20:42, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  What separates Effigia from Dinosaurs?
Talk:Subgiant

message: Taking a look at the 'what links here' for subgiant, it appears ALL of the wiki links are to the type of star. I am therefore moving the existing article from Subgiant to Subgiant (band), moving Subgiant star to Subgiant and disambiguating both. Modest Genius talk 15:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article moves

message: What is the average duration of a subgiant phase for Sun-like stars compared to red giant phase? --Artman40 (talk) 00:04, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: For a star like the sun, the subgiant phase is actually longer than the red giant phase!  2GYr is typical, less than 1 GYr for the red giant phase.  Much of the time on the subgiant branch is spent very close to the main sequence while the hydrogen shell is slowly adding mass to the helium core.  Once the core becomes degenerate the core temperature increases and the luminosity increases dramatically, so the time until the helium flash is relatively short.  The opposite is true of more massive stars. Lithopsian (talk) 00:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Subgiant phase duration

message: Some historical research has just been published on the early studies of subgiants . Might be a useful source for this article. Modest Genius talk 17:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for that, I hadn't seen this paper.  Not quite the world-changer it is heralded as though.  Those Mt Wilson subgiants were known and reported many years earlier, as mentioned in the article.  The new news is really just that Gamow missed the opportunity to use them to redefine stellar evolution a decade earlier than Sandage did.  It would be a good source if someone wants to write a detailed history section. Lithopsian (talk) 10:49, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: What is the source(s) of the data in the table? The linked source [8] does not contain these data unless I am mistaken.
Tapeyhworm (talk) 18:43, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The evolution table?  There are data tables included in the referenced journal.  You may not see them if you just download a pdf or similar.  Takes some digging, but the table here shows a handful of relevant data points.  Lithopsian (talk) 16:53, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Properties
Talk:Christ complex

message: Is there any difference at all between Christ complex and Messianic complex? The articles should probably be merged.  Luis Dantas 15:49, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Highly agree. MERGE. 67.42.14.57 21:15, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

message: According to Answers.com, the definition of Messiah is in three parts:
   1. also Mes·si·as (mĭ-sī'əs) The anticipated savior of the Jews.<P>
   2. also Messias Christianity. Jesus.<P>
   3. messiah One who is anticipated as, regarded as, or professes to be a savior or liberator.<P>
It does appear to overlap, I think a merge is needed.
Caarth 06:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think superiority complex, Christ complex, and Messianic complex should all be merged under superiority complex, with the other two as subsections. Thoughts? 71.59.16.84 20:21, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: =

message: "There are many types of disorders in which the Christ complex comes into play. The extreme example is a psychopath: someone who comes to operate without any regard for other humans."
By the way, why does WiPe want us to use the horizontal line "sparingly"? Just curious. 67.42.14.57 21:20, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: This should be taken out

message: superiority complex, psychopath and messiah complex don't necessarily belong together or mean the same thing.  Don't merge in superiority complex- read the article, it's about people who feel superior to others.  Messiah complex (277,000 google hits -wikipedia) people aren't fixated on superiority- the idea is they feel they can save/rescue others.  Messianic complex= just 15,700 google hits compared to the above, far more commonly used term.  Redirecting/moving other article there.Merkinsmum 23:57, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: this is nonsense
Talk:Gallorette

message: This is an ongoing problem with the horseracing articles in Wikipedia. The entries appear to be written in Daily Racing Form style and while this is fine for the racing fans, it isn't suitable for Wikipedia standards of encyclopedic content. Let's try to revise these articles to the level they deserve here. T.E. Goodwin (talk) 20:57, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tone and Style?
Talk:Chew on This

message: Would the second paragraph of the Plot Summary merit a Neutrality Disputed header?
Bmroute (talk) 23:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Surely a picture and infobox would be nice additions... Chevymontecarlo - alt 13:24, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture? 

message: A section of "Publication details" appears to me to constitute "article padding". Is there really nothing more to be said beyond the lead paragraph and synopsis? Most WP book articles do not suffer from the absence of such trivia. How about:
1. Age groups this "younger readers" oriented book is intended for. 
2. Reception of this book by the news media and literature reviewing organizations.
3. An example of an illustration from the book, or even a mention as to whether the book is illustrated, and the artist, if there is one.
--Quisqualis (talk) 21:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication details??
Talk:Publishing Interchange Language

message: The "Publishing Interchange Language" was originally called the "Page Interchange Language" but that was changed to clarify that it can create any sort of page or multi-page layouts.
I created the article for Publishing Interchange Language" and I mistakenly submitted it as "Page Interchange Language".
Contact me if you have any questions.
--Thomas L. Arnold 15:55, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Name
Talk:Palais Strousberg

message: This article was added to Portal:Germany /Did you know on 19 Nov. 2006 Saint|swithin 09:44, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Did you know

message: I passed this article for GA, it meets the criteria for that in my opinion. I've given Mcginnly feedback about it before.  DVD+ R/W 17:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA 

message: After reading through this article, I am delisting it for several reasons:
*There are few actual reference to speak of, including nothing once you get to the description of the building.
*The few references that do exist need to be properly written out using the Citation templates.
Due to how many references would need to be added and re-tooling, I'm straight delisting this. Wizardman 03:26, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA reassessment 
Talk:Plane–sphere intersection

message: I found this article to be quite useful while doing some coordinate frame transformations, however, it appears to me that the formula for the center of the circle should be (-da, -db, -dc.) I did not derive this; while writing unit tests for the software that I used to implement these formulae, the unit tests would fail unless I made this change.198.253.49.6 (talk) 18:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Formula?

message: I more or less rewrote the entry. The old calculations can be found in
the history. See [].
Haseldon 16:05, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old version

message: There should be some references added to indicate why this topic is notable. If it's used in ray tracing then perhaps this and similar calculations should be rounded up and put together into a single article.--RDBury (talk) 14:11, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unreferenced tag
Talk:So Happy Together (film)

message: "Fag hag" cannot be the best way of describing the main character.  --Xyzzyplugh 16:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: fixed typo / grammar Clementine777 (talk) 01:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[User:Clementine777|Clementine777]] ([[User talk:Clementine777|talk]]) 01:14, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
Talk:Pennsylvania Route 222

message: I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of July 3, 2007, compares against the  six good article criteria:
:1. Well written?: The article is well written with correct spelling and proper grammar usage. The red-link to Cedar Creek Park should probably be removed if the park is not notable however.
:2. Factually accurate?: Article is factually accurate.
:3. Broad in coverage?: Yes, covers all major points including the history and description of the road.
:4. Neutral point of view?: Written in an neutral point of view.
:5. Article stability? Very stable. No edit wars and little vandalism.
:6. Images?: Contains diagrams and maps which is enough for the article although an actual picture of the route may be helpful.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status. 
— --Hdt83  Chat 19:15, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Successful [[Wikipedia:Good articles|good article]] nomination
Talk:Cytokinesis

message: I would like to expand the section on plant cell cytokinesis, which at the moment is fairly rudimentary, and make it more comparable to the discussion on animal cell cytokinesis. that studies plant cytokinesis, so I know the field pretty well, and in fact I would probably adapt something short from the literature review portion of my thesis.  (Also see http://www.illuminatedcell.com/celldiv.html for some of what I've written). 
 
I do have some experience with wiki formatting, but I've never actually posted on wikipedia before, which is why I wanted to put this little post on the talk page to see if anyone had any comments or advice before I went ahead and edited the main article.
Thanks,
Steven Backues (talk) 18:02, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plant cell cytokinesis 

message: It seems to me that there is a conflict betwwen the following statement in the first paragraph:
"Cytokinesis is distinguished from the prokaryotic process of binary fission." and the inclusion of a later section on Bacterial cell cytokinesis - can someone clarify this?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.188.133.224 (talk) 15:42, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Bacteria

message: * http://www.bio.unc.edu/faculty/salmon/lab/mafia/mafiamovies.html
Please either use appropriate reference inline in the text WP:V, or discuss and justify external links here before adding to page: JetheroTalk 21:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links

message: <I>Due to the presence of a cell wall, cytokinesis in plant cells is significantly different from that in animal cells. Rather than forming a contractile ring, plant cells construct a cell plate in the middle of the cell. The Golgi apparatus releases vesicles containing cell wall materials. These vesicles fuse at the equatorial plane and form a cell plate. (...)</I>
Actually this is rather untrue. The idea that the Golgi apparatus provides the cell wall and plasma membrane material for the cell plate is not right. Dhonukshe et al. proofed in 2006 that CW and PM material for the cell plate comes from the already matured Cell Wall and Plasma Membrane together with all necessary proteins; there is no de novo synthesis of PM proteins and CW pektins. Nonetheless the Golgi apparatus is not the only source for the cell plate. For further review, see Developmental Cell 10, page 137-150, January 2006  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.58.177.80 (talk) 11:11, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plant cell cytokinesis 
Talk:The Tale of Heiji

message: Could it be, that part of the emaki scrolls are housed in the Tokyo National Museum? bamse (talk) 02:48, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A good section of it can be found in high res at the national digital archives here AMorozov (talk) 23:24, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: emaki scrolls are currently housed in the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston