lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Navarre (disambiguation)

message: I think Navarra should be a redirect to Navarre, and the disambiguation page here should disambiguate both Navarra and Navarre. After all, Navarra is just the Spanish word for Navarre. Kusma (talk) 04:52, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  Be bold and do it! :-) Or I will, if you prefer.  Tedernst 13:38, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Support. The first entry in Navarra points to the Kingdom of Navarre (or should) and the second should just be added to this list and a redirect be pointed to here from Navarra. Thaagenson 15:05, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge 

message: I removed this entry:
:*Seiken Densetsu 3 video game, Navarre is a kingdom of thieves
because WP:NOT a dictionary.  Tedernst 13:35, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  not a dictionary
Talk:Zygomaticus major muscle

message: I think this article should be renamed zygomaticus major. that is the proper name of the muscle. I dont know how to rename an article though. (comment from anon)
:I have moved the article to Zygomaticus major muscle. --Arcadian 07:14, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I

message: Which branch of the facial nerve innervates the zygomaticus major? Zygomaticus major muscle's infobox says zygomatic branch. List of muscles of the human body says buccal branch. Can anyone resolve this discrepancy?
Oh, and please... resolve this by using direct knowledge, not "common sense". ("Oh, that's easy, zygomatic innervates zygomatic" just won't cut it!)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.96.112.194 (talk) 10:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradiction 
Talk:Night of the Living Dead 3D

message: I added this film stub. (Sugar Bear 05:12, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Stub

message: Actually it does say what the reason is in the o.g. movie. It is radiation from a sattelite that has fallen to earth. A guy says it on the t.v.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Djfurguson (talk • contribs) 04:58, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, in the original, that's merely speculation by characters, not proven to be the cause. Romero intended it to be unknown what the actual cause was. Similarly, in Dawn of the Dead, there's speculation that Hell was full. Again, not the actual cause, at least not proven to be so.76.226.200.238 (talk) 19:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for outbreak in original movie. 

message: The article states "Unlike the first remake, no one involved with the original is involved with this version. The original film was never properly copyrighted, and so it has fallen into the public domain, making this remake possible with no permission from the original's creators (the original movie can actually be seen playing on TV in this version)."
However, this seems to contradict Wikipedia's article on copyright term:
"All copyrightable works published in the United States before 1923 are in the public domain;[37] works created before 1978 but not published until recently may be protected until 2047.[38] For works that received their copyright before 1978, a renewal had to be filed in the work's 28th year with the Copyright Office for its term of protection to be extended. The need for renewal was eliminated by the Copyright Renewal Act of 1992, but works that had already entered the public domain by non-renewal did not regain copyright protection. Therefore, works published before 1964 that were not renewed are in the public domain."
The original came out in 1968, so shouldn't it have been covered by the 1992 renewal act, and therefore, grandfathered in?  As it was released in 1968, it's copyright wouldn't have expired until 1996, but the 1992 renewal removed the requirement of "manual" renewal.
67.189.101.24 (talk) 12:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright
Talk:Hup (album)

message: I've added a tag requesting references be added to this page: all the claims sound plausible, but the whole article would benefit from some evidence (e.g. from an interview with a band member) that the Young Ones and Nuts In May stuff was intentional. The stuff about "Piece of Sky", "Can't Shape Up" and "Unfaithful" would also benefit from some sources: it sounds as if it comes from a biog, but at the moment it reads like original research. I've deleted a couple of egregiously POV words, and the final two sentences about "Unfaithful" which were simply fancruft.Dom Kaos (talk) 21:17, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up required 
Talk:Schur's inequality

message: I think if we replace the phrase
"for all positive real numbers x, y, z and t,"
with
"for all nonnegative real numbers x, y, z and a positive number t,"
, the inequality is still true.
Or any counterexample?
:Yes, you're correct, see Mathematical Excalibur, Vol 10, Number 5, Dec05 to Jan06, online version at http://www.math.ust.hk/mathematical_excalibur/ , further reference at the end of that article(Old and New Inequalities). --Lemontea 01:35, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  weakening the hypothesis 

message: This article doesn't currently discuss where this inequality is typically used (e.g., what is it useful in proving or modelling?) Dcoetzee 20:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Applications?
Talk:Duke of Ross

message: I hope to check Cockayne's The Complete Peerage soon, but I have found an Internet-based reference (although it doesn't cite its own sources). In any case, it's still hard for me to tell what was created when, so the information in the Wikipedia article isn't necessarily completely accurate (although I've tried to improve it). Ardric47 06:03, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Rutgers University Glee Club

message: User WLSchnee - I am the historian of the Rutgers University Glee Club.  The executive council of our Glee Club decided it would be fun to create a Wikipedia entry for the Glee Club, so I created this one last night but had only so far copied the history from our webpage to this space with complete authority to do so.
:Wikipedia gets lots of copyvios all the time, so it is difficult to know which are posted with permission. If you can show that you are the copyright holder or have permission to copy the content from the website (perhaps through a link from the club website to this article?), you are welcome to repost the content you posted before (pictures are alright if they are old enough to have run out of copyright or if permission is granted from the photographer). But please also note the Wikipedia NPOV policy - "Musical Excellence since 1872" is marketing, but is not really a suitable heading in an encyclopedia entry. u p p l a n d 07:16, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: I don't know if anyone actively edits/monitors this article, but check out Cornell Glee Club and Harvard Glee Club, both of which I have worked on.  They have lots of citations and are somewhat better organized.  If anyone has access to historical docs or stuff that can be used to provide proper citations, this will become a very good article.--Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 02:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article
Talk:Amesbury Friends Meeting House

message: if anyone from amesbury wants to help expand this, it would be appreciated.--Alhutch 06:44, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: From the looks of it, your the one who knows enough about it. If you can, I'd recomend taking a photo. Paul Carpenter 14:08, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion 
Talk:Pierrot Lunaire (band)

message: No one has made an article on the second Italian Renaissance yet and the article on the Italian Renaissance only seems to mention one -- the first, I suppose.  Is this a term prog fans made up?  If so, at the least it needs some explanation in the article. --216.15.125.193 (talk) 21:19, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Doing a quick google search the only place I can find that even mentions a "Second Italian Renaissance" is this article. I'm going to remove it from the artcile until someone comes up with a legitimate definition/explanation for it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.117.231.155 (talk) 20:18, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Italian Renaissance
Talk:2006 Winter Olympics (Participating Nations)

message: The current list seems to be incomplete. Australia and Jamaica were the ones I could spot, but I wouldn't be surprised that there are others. Andjam
:I found out yesterday that Jamaica isn't competing in bobsleigh, for the first time since their debut in 1988. Andjam 21:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing nations 

message: The main 2006 Winter Olympics article claims to have the full list of NOCs participating in Turin from the web site. No Chinese Taipei, amongst others.. I will amend this list as per the  main article. doktorb | words 19:19, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I put that in. The data comes from here:  and a lot of clicking on "by continent". Sam Vimes 22:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Brilliant - hopefully we're all co-ordinated now doktorb | words 07:53, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Hm, yes - the bobsleigh team definitely didn't make it. It is out of date as far as the athletes competing are concerned, it's listing a bunch of Dutch skaters who haven't been anywhere near the Olympic team, but I at least thought the amount of NOCs would be correct. Sam Vimes 09:00, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nations 

message: I built the page, but it's looking likely that none of the athletes qualified. The bobsleigh team definitely did not make it, and I can't find anywhere other than the Torino2006 page that any of the other three athletes made it. 
Sue Anne 05:30, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mexico 

message: Would adding the IOC country codes of the participating nations be useful? I'm sure it would be useful during the Games, to cross-reference; often the code and flag are the only country ID given for a participant on TV coverage, for example. Radagast 19:26, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, that's probably clever - can't think of any argument against, since the codes are so often used on TV and in the media Sam Vimes 21:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Codes 

message: This article is completely redundant with 2006_Winter_Olympics#Participating_NOCs. and that article has flag images and a map to make things look better. I suggest a redirect.--Jiang 10:33, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect?
Talk:McConnell v. FEC

message: This article should be titled McConnell v. Federal Elections Commission, as that's the cite on the case. McConnell v. FEC should redirect to the article with the correct cite as the title, not the other way around, as it is now. David Hoag 06:55, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

message: The history section says "In June 2003, the D.C. Court of Appeals issued a ruling on whether the law was constitutional. That ruling never took effect...".  Oddly, this doesn't say how the lower court ruled.  Does anyone know? --Sommerfeld 16:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  lower court result 

message: The opening paragraph applies good use of context, explaining the parties involved, where they were from, aliases, and the purpose of each party. There is even brief mention to how later hearings affected this one. The history section gives a brief, but descriptive account of the preceding events. Overall, it does a decent job of covering the main points and minimizing jargon for the reader. Personally, I think this section was well put together, but it could be broken up more and tied back to previous major finance regulation movements of the preceding century. Additionally, more context to the current events of the time could be given. This would help show the significance of this particular case. The oral arguments section mentions the oral arguments but does little to further elaborate on what was said in them specifically. The opinions section and the reception section seem like they could become one larger reception section. The reception section is rather short and doesn’t talk about how things were received, rather just the difficulty of understanding the ruling and the length of the response by the District of Columbia. The links seem to be in good working order. All-in-all, this is a good article, though, it could be expanded. It is vague and broad in some areas.  Zdp3 (talk) 20:50, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Evaluation
Talk:Chemical depilatory

message: I rewrote this article for my Wikipedia fork at Susan's Place Transgender Wiki:Chemical depilatory article and so I figured that share it by uploading here. The article in question clearly needed some work. This goes to show that forks are not always a bad thing :) SusanLarson 07:13, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrote for my site figured I would share 

message: What is the sensation like for a user?   My mother used to use one of these products many decades ago (for her arm pits) and she found that the cream stings.   Do modern products also sting? FreeFlow99 (talk) 17:10, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does it feel section needed
Talk:Guido Reni

message: "..one of Caravaggio's early patrons, Cardinal Scipione Borghese." Borghese was a thug, a criminal, a thief. He was also an art-lover, a man of refined taste, a delightful companion. He was never a 'patron' to Caravaggio, nor to anyone else; just a mafioso with a taste for art. 
In the English-speaking world, John Ruskin finished off Guido Reni's reputation, calling him many harsh names. If I can find Ruskin['s comments I'll add them here.
Nice article
PiCo 11:00, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know now where I read this about Ruskin/Reni - probably in a book on Caravaggio or the Baroque. I'll have to look. Ruskin's reputation was high in the C19th, the Robert Hughes of his day. His language appealed to his own age, but seems a trifle purple today. ("She is older than the rocks amongst which she sits," etc). Did he really finish off his own reputation? Just changing fashion I think - someday Bob Hughes too shall be sneered at. I agree that I'd rather dine chez Borghese. PiCo 06:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scipione Borghese 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:Guido Reni - Saint Joseph and the Christ Child - Google Art Project.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on June 6, 2017. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2017-06-06. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:28, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:Guido Reni - Saint Joseph and the Christ Child - Google Art Project.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 
Talk:West Newbury, Massachusetts

message: This article is deficient, I say! Let's make this better! I know there has to be somebody from West Newbury out there besides me!!!--Alhutch 07:23, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Please sign comments. FYI, "good" is a partially subjective judgement with a basis in reality. Here articles must conform to WP standards to be considered good. The Gettysburg Address would be a terrible WP article. It has a different basis in realty from WP. You can't really compare apples and oranges; you might think the article is a good apple when in reality it is a very bad orange. Enough said.Dave (talk) 16:35, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

message: Words like "beautiful", "quaint", "old-fashioned", and "sleepy" are subjective judgements that are more appropriate to a travel guide or a boosterism brochure than an encyclopedia. -- Beland 02:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: More true than not. One commends the enthusiasm for the town while affirming it is not acceptable WP. But, there is another issue preempting the correction of this language: references. The article contains many unreferenced subjective assertions, which must be addressed first. Editing WP is above all a look-up task. On the bottom line, it is put up or be still.Dave (talk) 16:35, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV/tone 

message: The census is taken every 10 years. Thus you get census numbers from 1990, 2000, etc. Numbers from 2006 are not strictly speaking the census. The site given for reference in this article by now has changed. Formerly we got the population of 2006 and the other numbers of 2000 passed off as 2006. Now we get the population of 2009 and the other numbers of 2000. Let's be precise about these things. I'll have to change it, starting with the census of 2009. There was no census in 2009.Dave (talk) 04:10, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Census and non-census

message: Revised paragraph (in History section) about now-outdated 2010 Forbes article asserting overpriced housing in West Newbury with discussion of perennial issue of preserving rural character vs development, with current citations and with NYTimes article about this issue in West NewburyWest Newbury (talk) 10:40, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Overpriced housing
Template talk:Ralph Bakshi

message: The code is, to say the least, not perfect. I created this template and I hope that others will help enhance it. (Sugar Bear 07:26, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

message: I created this because I felt it would perhaps be more organised, but the major reason was the original template contained unreadable small text. Piecraft 20:36, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, I think I like that better. Thanks a lot, Piecraft. (Sugar Bear 20:08, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  I think the current (above) template is too large (too high). How about this one? --Fred Bradstadt 07:00, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative Temp
Talk:William Fargo

message: Any way to confirm the date of death? Have seen this image of a USD$100 travelers cheque paid by "Wm G Fargo" to a hotel in Leipzig, dated 1891-08-05. Bears a regular serial number, not the all-zeros common to a specimen note.
:The image link you provided was dead (404 error). I confirmed date of death from Fargo's obituary in the NYTimes.DACC23 (talk) 18:56, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of death

message: ... but the really puzzling thing about this section is the last sentence: "His great-grandfather was the son of Moses Fargo (1691–1798)[4] and the grandson of Moses Fargo (1648–1742), who emigrated from England to Connecticut in 1670 and served with distinction in the Revolutionary War."
I don't know about anybody else, but I sincerely doubt that anyone who emigrated to Connecticut in 1670 went on to serve with distinction in the Revolutionary War.
Zgryphon (talk) 03:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  The first section is not so much "early life" as genealogy... 
Talk:R.B.I. Baseball

message: Why is the developer listed as "Tengen" when Namco made the game two years before its US release?--Dwedit 08:21, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Namco made the Family Stadium version in Japan, Tengen in the US converted the Famicom code to the American NES and added new rosters and some features. Is it standard to list the Japanese developer when they port a game to an American console? Gantry 01:43, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

message: So is there any information about this game making a comeback on the Wii as so many original NES games are doing? -Phoenixrod 00:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wii 

message: According to the top of this page, "A request for box art or an application icon has been made to help better illustrate the article." Would Moby Games count? I don't know enough about copyright issues to say. -Phoenixrod (talk) 04:53, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Box art 

message: If I recall correctly, this game did not receive the Nintendo Seal of Quality for some reason (perhaps the strange shape of the cartridge?).  Does anyone remember why? Funnyhat (talk) 00:34, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Tengen would release games unlicensed sometimes, for one reason or another. When ever a game was unlicensed, legally it couldn't have the traditional NES cartridge design.--Hellmark (talk) 20:16, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  Was a licensed version released later by Namco?  List of Nintendo Entertainment System games seems to imply it was. 68.156.95.34 (talk) 06:07, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nintendo Seal of Quality 

message: ~This needs significant updating as now R.B.I. Baseball is produced and developed by Major League Baseball Advanced Media, Polygon has published this January 22, 2018 article regarding R.B.I Baseball '18 that reveals that the franchise is being produced and developed by Major League Baseball Advanced Media: https://www.polygon.com/features/2018/1/22/16911760/rbi-baseball-18-ps4-switch-xbox-one-mlb-mlbam-history KSweeley (talk)
:Ive added some material to the history section, using that article as a source. The problem is this article is both about the series and about the first game inthe original series. I think the article needs to be split. oknazevad (talk) 17:57, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs updating.
Talk:ZPU

message: What is "Congo" of Operators? Republic of the Congo or Democratic Republic of the Congo? --Rheo1905 13:21, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What Congo? 

message: Source for use in Korea?--172.130.3.100 (talk) 01:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean War 

message: "This variant has been known to be used by North Korea in executions of high ranking officials.[2]" - should this be added? Whilst numerous news agencies are running with this story, the lack of sources (and a vague satellite photo) is stretching incredulity. These rumours have been shown to be false in the past - see Hyon Song-wol.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:2381:F2D3:1:AD40:FCE0:E411:12F7 (talk) 16:26, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Korea executions
Talk:Pope Alexander IV

message: I think the idea that Alexander IV belonged to the same family as Gregory IX (i.e., the Conti of Segni) is no longer current.  According to A. Paravacini Vagliani, Cardninali di Curia e 'familiae' cardializie dal 1227 al 1254, I (Padua, 1972), pp. 41-53, Raynald (as opposed to "Rinaldo") belonged to the family of the counts of Jenne (near Subiaco).  (Though he was still probably related to Gregory IX in some other way...)
Why no mention of the Papal Bulls issued by Pope Alexander IV in 1490s ‘donating’ the Indies to Spain,  which required a legal text which was read out to native peoples, requesting they submit to Spanish rule and religion. (See Seed, 1995, Ceremonies of Possession)???
:I imagine because this pope was active in the 1200s not the 1490s; different pope; likely you're thinking of Pope Alexander VI--FeanorStar7 10:05, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hi, I was viewing a discussion board and a "Protestant Supremacist" (as I like to call them), was claiming that Pope Alexander IV had "sex orgies in the Vatican". Has anyone ever heard of this? 71.89.6.90 18:52, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  ???? 

message: As there is a 14 year difference in the possible birth years a comment would be appropriate. Jackiespeel (talk) 08:55, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Birth year