Talk:Time attack

message: I've finally gotten around to rewriting this page, see User:Duozmo/Time_attack. I know that my new content is shorter, but I think that's for the best, and I'm happy to hash things out with anyone that's interested. I will put this new content up no sooner than Nov 27, even if I don't hear from anyone. For some background on why I wanted to rewrite this article, see the merge proposal at Talk:Speedrun#Merge_proposal_for_Time_attack. --Duozmo 14:34, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: There are a couple of things I would change in that proposed text. For example, is time attacking really less popular than speedrunning? I doubt it, since anyone can use a game's built in time attack mode, whereas speedrunning usually requires additional emulation/recording equipment or software. Personally I'm fairly happy with the wording of the article as it is, but there are a few things I do prefer about your proposal, which I'll incorporate. It is past the 27th, after all. :) --Nick R 15:50, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Done it now. Let me know what you think, but there are still some problems - I think the article needs a better structure, with some section headings; it's not very good having the contents menu halfway down the page! --Nick R 16:44, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, sorry I haven't responded for so long. I set a reminder to myself but forgot to have it trigger an alarm, and the date just sailed by without me noticing. I think what you've done here is better than what I have. I'll take a second look when I have a little more energy, but at the very least it's a major improvement over what used to be. Cheers --Duozmo 08:32, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

text:  I do not believe that NASA Time Trials should be mentioned on this page for Time Attack, at least not in the main body of discussion. Time Trials are not Time Attacks. There are very distinct differences between the two forms of Motorsport competition. Users looking to find information on Time Attack will be confused and misled if they attend a NASA Time Trial event looking for a Time Attack event. NASA does not organize Time Attack events, which is what this Wikipedia page is supposed to be discussing.--Chezterr (talk) 22:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've started a discussion at Template talk:Speedrun articles external links regarding whether the game-specific section should be included in the template, or whether the links there should only appear on the individual games' articles. Please post your thoughts on that talk page. --Nick R 10:10, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speedrun external links template 

message: Racing games (e.g. Virtua Racing, Daytona USA, Manx TT Superbike, and others) alawys have a time limit to skill out.
In this case, please GET READY TO CHALLENGE WITH TIME.
If time counts "00", you will taking into Game Over.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.160.211.69 (talk) 05:37, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why racing games always time-limited? 

message: To anybody who cares - I don't know enough to fix/clarify this, but the article starts with "time attack is another term for time trial" and below we have "Time Attack events should not be confused with Time Trial events." Was the latter still referring to Pikes Peak specifically?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.74.145.14 (talk) 02:19, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: To be clear—this article explains nothing. I read it carefully and it gives no information whatsoever. There is no way after reading this to summarize what a "time attack" event is, nor how a "time attack" differs from a "time trial". In fact more than half of the introduction is an advertisement for NASA Time Trials. Could someone who knows please write a short, clear, paragraph which describes what a time attack is? Could someone who knows please write a short, clear, paragraph which describes specifically how a time attack differs from a time trial? Nick Beeson (talk) 12:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Time attack/time trial 

message: I removed "for tuner event and media" from the first paragraph, because it made no sense. First it is bad English diction; it should be "for Turner Events and the media." Second googling "turner event" brings up three Lexus dealerships near New York City and nothing else. These are all local events, sponsored as advertising and sales events, and are not explained nor defined as to what they are at these web sites. These are definitely not notable as Wikipedia defines it. Nick Beeson (talk) 12:32, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:   for tuner event and media 

message: Below is the introduction I removed. It was incoherent containing such terms as "street tuned cars" and "tuning media" (which has only 54k hits on Google--this is a tiny number of hits indicating this is specialized technical jargon, not known to readers of Wikipedia. "tune up" is a similar auto related term known to everyone and it got 7 million hits.) The actual form of competitions is not described. The type of cars is only hinted at. In other words this is a mess. Look at Stock car racing, Formula One, or Drag racing for good examples of what this introduction should look like.Nick Beeson (talk) 20:59, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  intro rewrite 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://globaltimeattack.com/history/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  /wiae /tlk 19:03, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: It seems to me this article is trying to cover two different subjects, motorsport and video games, and the article should be split accordingly. --Falcadore (talk) 00:46, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, this needs to be split into Time Attack (motorsport) and Time Attack (computer games). HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 05:48, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article split