Talk:Leo Stoller

message: There is a patent troll page, why is there no trademark troll page?  It seems that mr Stoller would be a prime candidate as an example.
this term is used by Boing Boing today  http://www.boingboing.net/2007/01/13/trademark_troll_leo_.html  --kris 19:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trademark troll?

message: User Ldms4 has repeatedly added a biased and redundant summary of the recent 7th Circuit decision requiring Google to include Mr. Stoller as a defendant (which was hardly a total victory for Mr. Stoller, as claimed by one of Ldms4's edits).  User Ldms4 apparently has the same lack of respect for Wikipedia that Mr. Stoller has for our judicial system.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.239.121 (talk) 14:52, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stoller appears to be editing this page himself 

message: Removal or complete rewrite of "APPEALS COURT GIVES STOLLER A VICTORY OVER GOOGLE" section. How is it even there? SouperAwesome (talk) 10:04, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please provide a specific description of the change.  "rewrite" is not nearly specific enough. Happy‑melon 11:33, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: OK... the factual information in that section is already present in a more appropriate section, while the disputed section itself ends in a highly POV and arguably highly inaccurate claim that it's a "total victory for Stoller" (actually, it's just a reversal, on a technicality, of a defeat for Stoller, and resulted in the case being sent back to the lower court for further action, with the sanctions against Stoller making further filings until he pays a court-ordered fine still in effect). *Dan T.* (talk) 15:16, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

text: In addition, note the improper style of this section, with all caps header, it is clearly an attempt to spin the story in favor of Mr. Stoller.  On the case itself, what the 7th circuit said was that Stoller got to participate in this lawsuit against his former companies (which are now in bankruptcy), but it did not reach the merits--Google's lawsuit against Stoller is still very much alive.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.43.48.194 (talk) 23:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

text: section removed. Happy‑melon 09:30, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: I question whether an article on this man is appropriate, but if it's going to be here those of us who have had run ins with him will rejoice that he is currently incarcerated and that his blog, youtube, etc are deleted. If someone has better access to Circuit Court of Cook County records than I do, perhaps the Law Bulletin service, this article needs the court's several contempt citations directing the Cook County Sheriff to take Stoller into custody. 24.14.72.223 (talk) 04:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Stoller imprisoned

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 6 external links on Leo Stoller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://mesh.medill.northwestern.edu/mnschicago/archives/2002/08/illinois_attorn.html
*Added  tag to http://home.comcast.net/~jlw28129/05_C_2052.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.chicagojewishnews.com/story.htm?id=196195
*Added  tag to http://www.bannerwitcoff.com/press_releases/win969_1.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.roylance.com/Uploads/CentralMfgCo/Complaint%20FILED.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/tmp/DD0YWFTX.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061023092658/http://www.oblon.com/media/index.php?id=320 to http://www.oblon.com/media/index.php?id=320
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061023121627/http://www.oblon.com/files/news/320.pdf to http://www.oblon.com/files/news/320.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/tmp/DD0YWFTX.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110719164850/http://www.ilnb.uscourts.gov/JudgeSchmetterer/Opinions/Stoller.pdf to http://www.ilnb.uscourts.gov/JudgeSchmetterer/Opinions/Stoller.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061206173141/http://roylance.com/publications.asp to http://www.roylance.com/publications.asp
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061230153741/http://roylance.com/Uploads/CentralMfgCo/Voluntary%20petition%2012-20-05.pdf to http://www.roylance.com/Uploads/CentralMfgCo/Voluntary%20petition%2012-20-05.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070101172632/http://roylance.com/Uploads/CentralMfgCo/ch%2013%20plan.pdf to http://www.roylance.com/Uploads/CentralMfgCo/ch%2013%20plan.pdf
*Added  tag to http://www.roylance.com/Uploads/CentralMfgCo/Trustee%20letter%20of%20appointment.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:42, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Leo Stoller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://caselaw.findlaw.com/data2/circs/7th/062083p.pdf
*Added archive https://archive.is/20120718123313/http://stollerexposed.blog.com/2011/01/14/leo-stoller-arraigned-on-federal-fraud-charges/ to http://stollerexposed.blog.com/2011/01/14/leo-stoller-arraigned-on-federal-fraud-charges/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified