Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 9

message: Does someone have a list of the Smach files listed in Nintendo Power? I only know the 9th which is Fox. Sora3087 22:54, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wii SMASH FILES

message: Apparently a site called "Nintendojo" just caught wind of that stupid Young-Link-replaced-by-Young-Link rumor and posted it as though it was the latest news today. You have been warned. --HeroicJay 20:51, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: REALLY... Well, could someone post a link to it here for everyone's reference, then? It might be necessary. And I assume you meant Young Link replaced by cel-shaded Windwaker Link. ;-) Erik Jensen (Appreciate|Laugh At) 21:31, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I said what I meant, though your description works too. Anyway, here is a link to the re-re-re-re-return of the rumor. Of course, the only source they give is that French article from last June. --HeroicJay 21:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

text: It was deemed not credible a long time ago. Its date was last June - before Fox was officially confirmed - gives no evidence of its assertions, and Nintendo has yet to do a single thing to give any credence. There's also been no evidence yet provided that the radio show Sakurai allegedly revealed the information on even exists. --HeroicJay 22:39, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I agree. It would not have taken anywhere near this long to find independent confirmation of the radio interview if it was real. --69.156.207.34 18:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nintendojo 

message: okay i have an artcile, legitamte, on new details about some charcters
http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3151290
 
Apparently, Masashiro Sakurai announced that Bowser Jr, the "Celda" (windwaker) version of Link, and Ridely (archenmies of Samus) will be in Wii Brawl Game.  Also learned is that the Ice Climbers, Mr. Game & Watch, and Young Link are not returning .  Sakuri also stated he wanted to have at least 40 characters, with 1-2 more third party characters added. Nebfootball7 02:59, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: We have received this information before, and in truth it's a rumor. BassxForte 03:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Why does no one ever bother to look closely at news. Other then the fact it's been discussed here, did you see the date of that newspost? JackSparrow Ninja 03:41, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I hope that rumor's not true except for the additions.  It'd be pretty cool to have the Windwaker Link and Ridley. 10:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You listed 1up as a reliable source, that's very wrong. More Wrong than Mushroom Kingdom Hearts. Mavrickindigo 01:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super Smash Brawl Chracter Additions 

message: I didn't see any discussion or source for the change from "Great Battle Smash Brothers" to "Great Fray Smash Brothers".  Is it an obvious enough change and I'm just missing something?  They seem functionally similar to me (correct me if I'm wrong on this), with "Battle" sounding better subjectively. EpsilonZ 14:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Great Fray"? 

message: Does anybody know if they're revealing anything about the game at GDC 2007? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.113.186.64 (talk) 01:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It could be possible. I hope so anyway. 75.84.185.89 03:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: GDC

message: This was covered before here, but it seems someone has changed it yet again.  Although Pikachu has appeared in every *major* Pokémon game so far, he (it?) hasn't appeared "in every Pokémon video game made to date".  As the aforementioned link... mentions... There were several e-Reader and Pokémon mini games that did not include Pikachu. 71.124.42.16 06:15, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, this detail instantly requires us to change the sentence into "Pikachu has appeared in just about every Pokémon video game made to date". A minor necessity, IMO. Erik Jensen (Appreciate|Laugh At) 18:43, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you can even consider the e-Reader and Pokémon mini games to be real games to begin with. - DisasterKirby 18:55, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Regardless if *you* feel that the e-Reader and mini games are "real", they are, in fact, quite real (and some of the e-Reader ones are actually pretty fun).  I don't think it's a big deal or anything, but I do think this particular line would be better phrased "Pikachu has appeared in every major Pokémon video game made to date." - just to be accurate.  That is what we strive for, n'est ce-pas? 71.124.42.16 03:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I second that. The e-reader games and minigames are not canon, so they should not be considered. "Major" Games is a good alternative. Quatreryukami 13:14, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pikachu lies, more lies and damn lies! 

message: When Nintendo announced its second quarter game release schedule at the 2007 Game Developers Conference, Super Smash Brothers Brawl was not included indicating it will not be released until at least quarter three 2007.  Nintendo also indicated that the first North American game to utilize the Wii's internet functionality would be Pokemon Battle Revolution.  Nintendo has long asserted that it intends to incorporate internet play into Super Smash Brothers Brawl.  As a result, Brawl will not be released before Battle Revolution which is currently set to reach North American shelves on June 25.°  The exact release date, however, remains open to speculation.
:Analysis taken with permission from www.zappayowyow.iwarp.com facts confirmed at  www.ign.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 129.74.229.123 (talk) 20:55, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Its repetitive information like this that makes this page so long. Its not coming out until Q4. I've been saying that since last year. FMF|contact 21:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: November is a very likely time. Powerslave (talk-contribs) 23:45, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This website's release date seems to be credible (3rd one down):  12.206.235.170 19:00, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the FAQ. Dancter 19:03, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I recently obtained the February 2007 (Issue 166) edition of "Game Informer" Magazine. Inside on page 74, above the copy, the release date of the game states: Release June 1. Since it does not specify the location or year, I can only think of 2007, in North America, because this is where the magazine was issued. Is this a legit source? And in what standards? Latteran 16:51, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Release Date Information from the 2007 Game Developers Conference 

message: It has been announced at IDMB that Ganondorf will appear in SSBB. Also it has been stated by Takashi Nagasako (the voice of Ganondorf in SSBM) that he has been asked to voice him again in Brawl.
IMDB is not an accurate source, we really don't know if Ganondorf will be in it, though most likely, read the FAQ please. OBEY STARMAN 13:47, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: At the top of the page...or here. — MalcolmUse the schwartz! 22:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ganondorf at IMDB 

message: If a section is only one sentance long, I'd say that it should be deleted and merged into another section.
--Bentendo24 21:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. Maybe it could be merged into the introduction? Might not be the best place, but I don't see any other appropriate sections. –Llama mantalkcontribs 22:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deletion of wifi section. 

message: With all that "Sonic talk" from the media, etc should there be a subsection or at least the use of this:
;Sonic references
There is (or was the last time I checked) a lot just about him. Should that information on him even stay there or be deleted? Should it stay the way it is (or was the last time I checked) unless he is announced? FMF|contact 22:28, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's Brawl related, so it should stay. But I do agree on the subsection idea.
EDIT: My other suggestions are "Sonic Rumors" or something like. By the way, when has this become an issue? It wasn't an issue before, so why is it now? magiciandude 22:37, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Okay, I decided to make a subsection currently titled "Most Requested Third Party Character". I know it isn't the best name right now, but at least it's a subesection. Thanks for the suggestion FullMetal! ^_^ magiciandude 23:20, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I take that back, I changed it into a subsection of inclusion of characters and just named Sonic the Hedgehog just to make it simple. Sorry for all the edits that are deemed unneccessary, I just wanted to avoid a possible arguement making the solution to the problem a lot easier. Thanks again for the suggestion FMF. magiciandude 23:26, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

text: ...That's a cloud. -Sukecchi 18:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonic subsection? 

message: I reverted a release date and posted a note at the top of the page saying that release dates are not to be posted unless they are official. Please check the history and tell me if I did the right thing! Quatreryukami 13:12, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I expanded it a little, but it looks good. You did the right thing =) JackSparrow Ninja 22:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I placed a date found in the Februray 2007 Edition of "Game Informer". I am not sure on how exactly accurate it is. Latteran 17:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  adds 

message: Ridley, Windwaker Link, & Bowser JR. are in
Ice Climbers, MR. Game & Watch, & Young Link are out
Link is 
Dylan Uzumaki 22:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: This news is ancient and unconfirmed, what is their source? -Sukecchi 23:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Characters 

message: This article was posted two years, but it talks about Naka talking with Miyamoto about making a game with Mario and Sonic in it.  I'm currently searching in the Internet to see what the "secret conversation" was. magiciandude 16:58, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was about putting Sonic in Mario Kart DS, it never happened. I bet it was all a rumor. OBEY STARMAN 13:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Could Miyamoto want Sonic because of this? 

message: This is totally trivial, but at this point only trivial matters remain to be discussed about this article, pretty much. The image of the Halberd was taken off the smashbros site, and as of recently the Upload File screen states "Do not upload files from websites or an image search engine. They will be deleted." Assuming it's better to take snapshots of trailers ourselves and upload them in fair-use website images' places, does anyone think it's better if there's an image of the Halberd stage as it was seen near the end of the second trailer, with the other characters like Snake and Zero Suit Samus battling on it and the Halberd ship flying off to the right in the background? Erik Jensen (Appreciate|Laugh At) 20:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, it is an actual stage, so I wouldn't see why not...Gamloverks 20:46, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Halberd image 

message: I added some info on this, the game has spurred much interest about Sonic being a character on SSBB, much more than any previous quotes. Many fans think it is a positive sign for Sonic being in the game.
But it was removed and labelled vandalism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Super_Smash_Bros._Brawl&diff=118531528&oldid=118514427
I really think this is worth including, it's a far more positive sign for Sonic being in the game than any previous info. Doesn't everyone think it should be included? My description may have been a bit vague, but regardless, calling it vandalism is definately harsh. I'm  not 14 years old.Philtrauferson 15:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well considering that "Mario and Sonic in the Olympic Games" is entirely fictional (unless you have any real proof on it), I'd say that it was labeled accordingly. - DisasterKirby 15:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, okay, maybe it isn't fictional. My bad. - DisasterKirby 16:43, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

text: I am shocked! Mario & Sonic at the Olympic Games is an actual game being developed for Wii... Well then, as per verifiability guidelines, let's not even mention it in this article unless Sakurai makes mention of it on his Dojo site or something. Erik Jensen (Appreciate|Laugh At) 18:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Would a note at the end of the Sonic section specifying against adding speculation based on this game be of some need? Someone has already tried to add the info again, and we all know that it'll happen at least a few more times... - DisasterKirby 00:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

text: Well! As magiciandude has illustrated, when a subject like this olympic game occurs and can be interpreted in opposite ways (Sonic in Olympics means Sonic in Brawl! vs. Sonic in Olympics means Sonic is not in Brawl!), it's all the more reason not to mention it as part of the article. Erik Jensen (Appreciate|Laugh At) 16:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mario and Sonic in The Olympic Games 

message: Can we add things we see in the official trailers for the game.  I notice that on the stage with the exterior of the castle you could see what looks like flaming arrows being shot across the stage and Samus possibly being hit by one.  Can you guys add this? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Zojo (talk • contribs) 17:19, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, because it's speculation. -Sukecchi 17:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Observation in Stages 

message: How does it work when a third-party company throws their character in Brawl?  For example, what's in it for Konami when Nintendo puts Snake in Brawl?  Does Konami get a very small profit of game sales or does Nintendo pay a small fee for using Snake?  Or does Konami get nothing except the pleasure of having their character in one of the most awesome games ever?  How does it work?  User:Zojo 13:20, 1 April 2007
:Uhhh...I have no clue. I doesn't really matter to the article at hand, however.
:P.S., sign your comments with four tildes (~), it's a lot easier than what you're doing now. Comrade Pajitnov 17:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah... if only Wikipedia were so obvious about sig syntax a year and a half ago. During my first half-year on Wikipedia starting in October 2005, I did not know how to provide a signature like everyone else, and there was NO instruction on it anywhere that I could find, so I had to custom-craft my sigs. (See here for my lack of education at the time... and nobody ever came.) Hence why I didn't post much on talk pages during my first half-year on here. True story! :D Anyway, profits from the game doesn't sound like something the article'd be discussing until long after the game sells. And yes, I agree with you, Comrade Pajitnov, that you doesn't really matter to the article at hand. XD Erik Jensen (Appreciate|Laugh At) 17:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Um, yeah, for a long time I didn't know about edit summaries.  Heck, I learned most of what I know about Wikipedia through experimentation and looking at various articles' source code.  True story!  :p  --Luigifan 02:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, thanks for the tip.  I'm new and still learning the ropes.  And, you're right that has nothing to do with the article.  Just curious...  (Zojo 14:12, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When you're editing a page, look below the textbox and the save page button: there's a huge table full of special characters and common wiki markup for easy insertion. - Zero1328 Talk? 11:47, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

text: There are generally licensing fees. However, one major aspect is promotions. By having such characters in Brawl, it could not only boost Brawl's sales, but also promote the series that character is from. --Ultima 04:11, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third-party characters 

message: It is odvious but im am still saying it. There are genres from which the fighters are from. From memory I can at least say a couple :
Nintendos super stars ( Mario, link Samus ect.)
Nintedos recuring stars ( Kirby , Foz, captain falcon)
then, the SNES to NES characters (pit, ice climbers ness MR.Game @ watch)
Then odviously third party characters ( Snake, sonic=unkown, Viewtiful joe=unknown.
This also works with the levels to.
I feel my idea of the "genres" should be on the smb wikipedia page.
p.s. IT SHOULD ALSO BE CONSIDERED THE POSIBILITY TO PLAY AS MIIS AND DS CONECTIVITY. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.14.49.103 (talk) 21:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  character gernres 

message: This is proably not that important but....
at the start of smb (n64) opening, a white glove appears holding a nintendo character doll that comes to life. In smbm (game cube)a 
random hand throws a mario statue ( and a link statue-kirby and pikachu are not scene trasforming-.) that come to life (any one see the pattern ?) First of all should this be worth mentioning and secodly, if this trend follows will it be seen in "smabs" and if so what will the "toys " be? models? 6 inch figure?  (smabs is my nickname for it , I got it from the smash dojo when  smash is metioned in brakets as smabureken)
What could this toy be? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.64.67.94 (talk) 14:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Games recuring themes. 

message: Would it be possible for some one to translate the smashbros opera from the first add , translate it, and put it on the smb:brawl page? I 8 fud —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.64.67.94 (talk • contribs).
:No, because that will be considered copyright violation. -- ReyBrujo 16:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Where on the internet might they be posted? I've never seen the translated lyrics, so I'd like to be pointed to the site where they are posted legally. Erik Jensen (Appreciate|Laugh At) 17:26, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Because they're just that; unofficial. Go post them at a forum. Anyway, I've seen word-by-word translations of the theme, but it doesn't really make much sense without grammar. Gurko 09:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  smb: brawl opera 

message: Samus Aran's greatest rival will be joining the Super Smash Brothers Brawl roster, as well as pint-sized versions of Mario's most formidable foe and Hyrule's Hero of Time.
SSBB director Masashiro Sakurai made the announcement via Japanese radio program "The Gaming Show" that Metroid mega-boss Ridley, Bowser Jr. and the Wind Waker version of Link have been added as new members to the Super Smash Brothers Brawl combatant list. The newly added triad join the other first-timers making an appearance in the Nintendo brawler-- Metal Gear Solid hero Solid Snake, Meta Knight, Wario, and Zero Suit Samus.
Getting the boot with this iteration of the Super Smash Brothers series are Young Link, the Ice Climbers, and Mr. Game and Watch. Sakurai expects a roster of 40 characters to fill the game, with other non-Nintendo characters joining the fray still a possibility. 
:Will someone added this to the FAQ until the game is released? This is getting old... FMF|contact 23:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Forget it, I did not see it. FMF|contact 00:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

text: What is the authenticy of this satement? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.14.51.179 (talk • contribs).
none, just cause someone says it doesn't make it true but I guess everyone else didn't get the memo.Marioman12 16:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other Characters

message: An employee of EBX told me Peach was confirmed, but I have seen nothing about Peach in Brawl.  Has anyone seen anything? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.76.192.231 (talk) 14:59, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Pete, unless you have valid sources, it's all just speculation. my doubts they would drop two and a half (Zelda/Sheik) characters, especially female characters. whittling away at them is sure to piss off quite a few people. FyreNWater 07:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

text: We have made up our minds, she is neither "in" or "not in" yet, there is no confirmation either way. Minirogue 20:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Princess Peach 

message: surely this was in pokémon red and green, not red and blue? just yell if I'm being pedantic! Jackacon 16:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, Pokémon red and green was released in Japan first, then Red and Blue came to America later. Frumfst 17:01, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  pikachu's first appearence 

message: I went to the Super Smash bros Brawl Official Site, and it brought up the COntent Warning, with a "T" for Teen rating logo. Toa Mario 20:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Dojo? I still see a "Rating Pending" notice on the English index page. --Sparky Lurkdragon 13:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It really has no point. The rating is only changed through the climb or decline of violence or adult manner. The game (Melee) had more violence, as compared to the original SSB, because the characters were presented more realistically, with more realistic weapons, and more realistic stages. That is why the original SSB was not classified as a T ranking. Latteran 17:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: rating

message: In case anyone has noticed, there are 28 levels of difficulty. The 1 to 9 bar at the bottom of cp's charater select ( average player if you play at this level) then 9 to 18 . The extra 9(9+9=18) difficulty is added from the handicap screen plus the enemies current level (very advanced ) and , the newly discovered extra 10  , the hit ratio that  goes from 1.0 to 2.0 (1.1, 1.2 ect)plus the preiviously mentioned factors and those that fight at this level are smash masters.
There is a possibility that in the new smash, new factors could extend this difficulty to say 60 or 70 (WoW).
This is away to seperate the smash saps from the smash masters.
Oh and this is MY RESEARCH so yall dont need to tell me. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.95.69.22 (talk) 21:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I hate to say it, but your post seems kind of, well, forum-y (I know that isn't a word). Remember, talk pages aren't forums about the subject, but are rather discussion areas for the articles. Thank you. --LuigiManiac 21:53, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

text: i fail to see the relevance of this information. leave it out of the article and just post it on some forum or something. FyreNWater 07:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 28 levels of power = expanded !!! 

message: It has been confirmed that the game is to be released in the US on 6/3/07.
:First of all, this should go at the bottom, not the top. That aside, this is still probably false. Disaster Kirby 21:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know where his proof is, but I know that my proof is in the pudding. Chocolate pudding, to be exact. --LuigiManiac 21:20, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  US release date 

message: I think mabye to improve the article we should put pictures of each of the characters.
--YOSHIANDLINK1 00:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Already discussed, agreed that wouldn't be the best thing to do. It would clutter the article. Plus, there's a group shot of all the characters in the article already. -Sukecchi 00:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fox had an image and it vanished, but Fox's article contains an image of him in Brawl. -Sukecchi 00:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: With a link to the official website at the bottom of the page that has all the pictures you could want, the article really doesn't need many screenshots.  Am I right?  (Zojo 18:17, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures of the Characters 

message: Yoshi is prabably in Brawl because of his stage. Why would they have a Yoshi stage without Yoshi?--YOSHIANDLINK1 01:02, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Speculation, although it is a given. Quatreryukami 01:24, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Whether or not Yoshi is in the game is currently speculative, although he could be considered semi-confirmed. BassxForte 02:37, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: it's very likely he'll be in the game, as he was in the first two games and there was the Yoshi's Island-themed stage in the trailer. however, since there's no CONFIRMATION, we can't write that in. only when he's officially announced by Nintendo &/or the official game site can we add him to the roster. FyreNWater 07:36, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Won't that just start us on a slippery slope? Once that section is started, I can imagine people will start adding characters to it that don't belong there. How can we define "likely character", anyway? --LuigiManiac 15:33, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Although I really don't think we should, bc of spec, Likely Character would just be a reprint of the char lists form Melee, and Sonic, of course. But dont do it!!!!Quatreryukami 15:51, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually maybe we should keep the circle even smaller than that, Princess Peach, Sonic, and Yoshi.  If there is only a few characters than the slope will not be so slippery.Anubiz 16:19, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Proof of my point. What about Bowser? Why would Peach get in before Bowser if they were both considered for the original and were both in Melee? See, the thing is that most of the characters from Melee would have some reason for returning to Brawl. I don't know any reason why Peach should be on that list if any of the others from Melee don't get on. --LuigiManiac 16:27, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Bower is the bad guy.  Princess peach is a lot more popular than Bowser I also didn't know they considered him for the original.  Also I thought somebody said that she was likely in the Princess peach section of this page.Anubiz 16:35, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: A "likly character" section would just turn this article into a soapbox with people adding any character they feel like, it would only hurt the article, thus iit should not be put in. BassxForte 16:41, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: The real problem is that such content is based on personal speculation that is not attributable to a reliable source. It's original research. If Sakurai makes a verifiable statement that a character was likely to be in the game, we can mention that, as Sakurai is a reliable source as the director of the game. No such source can be provided for this. Dancter 16:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: At your request, fixed. --LuigiManiac 00:25, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yoshi is prabably in Super Smash Bros. Brawl...right? 

message: seriously, can someone explain why
We know what Wario looks like.Anubiz 21:01, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...That's not it. >_> There are already 5 images on this page, we can't have too many. Otherwise it will look cluttered and unorganized. -Sukecchi 21:01, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Perhaps because you have to make your user page on your own? You don't 'earn' your user page. Disaster Kirby 17:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Omnitrix article is a completely different case. That is in a list format, this article is not. -Sukecchi 17:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Is what a rumour? --LuigiManiac 15:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Well, seeing how Nintendo will probably release some kind of picture of the next character, I'm sure it isn't a rumour. We just don't have it yet. --LuigiManiac 15:45, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're getting into fan discussion, which this is not the place for. -Sukecchi 17:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

text: That's speculation. Has NP even said they're revealing a new fighter? As far as I know,they have not. You're going on the fact that they showed every character already.  -Sukecchi 18:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm going to assume that's supposed to be optimistic. It's still speculation. -Sukecchi 20:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Talk pages are for article discussion only. Meaning talk pages are only to be used to discuss how to make the article better. Not discussion about the article's subject. This is not a forum. -Sukecchi 01:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

text: WTF is "tray yoga"? Is that some new suburban thing? Seriously though, Sukecchi has a point. Wikipedia is serious business. If you want to be humored, got to GameFAQs or something. Not here though. If you don't like it, leave. InsaneZeroG 01:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia has rules and guidelines, this frivolous discussion that's going on violates those same rules and guidelines. -Sukecchi 01:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Wait until the game is released first, then we'll talk about putting pictures of all or no characters. In all actuality, they'd probably be put on the Super Smash Bros. (series) article rather than this one. The only reason the revealed characters are on this one instead of that one is probably because the full list hasn't been revealed yet. And even if it is, pictures that show the general looks of the game will be more proper than the ones of each character. BTW Anubiz, have you ever heard of checking your spelling? InsaneZeroG 04:31, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ...How about this whole "If the next trailer..." speculative fiasco just stops? When we get new information we'll go from there. For now, just stop, this talk page is being quite difficult to look at. -Sukecchi 14:33, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

text: I'm not yelling at you. -Sukecchi 16:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Wait, what? Seriously, check your spelling and grammar.  InsaneZeroG 18:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he said "Wikipedia is not a forum sir de wario. You must never deviate from The Man's rules, or otherwise you will end up like me." From the sounds of it he normally uses Dragon, a speech recognition program. Although I admit the last one was a little hard to understand, I think he is still getting his point across well for typing words out when he doesn't normally do so. --LuigiManiac 18:35, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  how are my images unnesacary 

message: I don't know if this source can be trusted but according to Nintendo Dream, Gamelabo and Famitsu, the game will be released in Japan in December. I'm not sure if we should put the Japanese release date as December 2007, or Holiday 2007, but I think it should maybe be changed. Here's the source for you guys to check out http://www.jeux-france.com/news19962.html -Alegeobla 18:46, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While Famitsu is definitely a reputable source, if the information has indeed been reported by the aforementioned publications, it will be covered by reliable English-language sites that can be trusted to do a better job with translation than Babelfish. There's no need to rush on this. Dancter 00:20, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanese Release Date 

message: Super smash bros brawl is confirmed for the wii.
(Sorry if I got your hopes up!)
No but seriously, I have read that mario strikers charged will be realeased soon and IT WAS SAID TO BE WIFI COMPATIBLE . Does this mean we can expect wifi soon? We realy dont know if smash will be wifi compatible in the final agenda, so mabey this could shed some light?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.12.186.66 (talk • contribs) 
:...Wtf? Uhm, its been on Wii since the start of dev!Quatreryukami 01:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Read the rest of the post. It goes on to say wi-fi stuff.And no, 74. (How does one game having wi-fi mean another will?)—Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？ 01:23, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: (edit conflict) And if we put something in the SSBB article about wi-fi being likely, that would be pure speculation. Which is bad. — MalcolmUse the schwartz! 01:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

text: *facepalm* this just in: it's ALWAYS been for the Wii and Wi-fi was announced a while back. FyreNWater 07:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The first Wii game that's WiFi compatible was Pokémon Battle Revolution, and it was released in Japan in December. Although this really doesn't have anything to do with the article at all. Just because one game is going to be WiFi-enabled doesn't mean a single thing about an entirely different game being WiFi-enabled. Disaster Kirby 07:18, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

text: WiFi compatibility for SSBB was announced at the same time the game was, way before the name was decided, (or even before Sakurai became director..) It's even on the article. Everyone's more concerned about what the limit of this WiFi compatibility will be at the end. Keep up with the news... - Zero1328 Talk? 09:51, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Wait a minute!  Super Smash Bros Brawl is confirmed for the Wii?!  Seriously?!  AWESOME!!!  I was under the impression that Brawl would be the last games released for the N64.  But now it's on the Wii...SWEEEEEEEEEET!!! And it's Wifi compatabe to boot!  Man, I never dreamed something this awesome could ever happen.  (Zojo 14:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  BIG NEWS!!!!