lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Emmeline Pethick-Lawrence

message: For a biographical article, this one is pretty thin on its subject's early life.  It mentions her father's occupation, but not his name.  Her mother is notably absent.  Her birth order is the only mention of siblings.  Other than being sent away to school, her schooling and influences are absent.  Only when she's 24 do we get to the substance of the article.  Surely someone as prominent as this left records of her life somewhere. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 12:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The ODNB article has more - father Henry Pethick of nonconformist Cornish stock, mother's maiden name Collen, she was only briefly at boarding school, happier at day school in Weston-super-Mare, close relationship with father and her Pethick relations, fondly recalled her more conventional mother. Inspired by father's defence of liberty and justice. It's here - you'll need a library card from a British local authority if you don't have a subscription. DuncanHill (talk) 12:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early life?
Talk:Gaziantep Oğuzeli Airport

message: Flight radar 24 den izlerken ve kendi deneyimlerimle ucaklarin hep 28 numarali pisten indigini gordum bunun nedeni sizce nedir
Translation in English - "Why is the runway number 10 not used? - While watching flight from radar 24 and with my own experience, I saw that planes always landed on runway 28, what do you think is the reason for this?"
Response - Maybe best answered by posting your question to somewhere like https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=23606483 
Yanıt - Belki de en iyi şekilde, sorunuzu https://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=23606483 gibi bir yere göndererek yanıtlayabilirsiniz.Pmbma (talk) 19:56, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  10 Numarali pist neden kullanilmiyor
Talk:Erlik

message: The English used in this article could use some work. Unfortunately, I don't see how I could improve it without more intimate knowledge of the subject material.
Kenosis Stern 08:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think, Turkish "Erlik" & Hungarian "Ördög" were the same god. Böri (talk) 12:30, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: There's significant disagreement about whether the Jews, Christians and Muslims worship the same god, and whether Jupiter and Zeus were essentially the same or merely mashed together in the Hellenizing of Rome. Without tighter connections between the two cultures than I believe existed, I think the best one can say is that there was some culture transference there. (Of course, if Erlik wants to stand up and claim that he also receives worship under the name of Ördög, that would cinch it there.) I was going to add a see also to Ördög, but as you can see from that article, it doesn't even claim that Ördög was a god. I would say the entire set of articles could use improvements from multiple scholarly sources.--Prosfilaes (talk) 20:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Erlik = Ördög 

message: The sons are listed twice, apparently using 3 different transcriptions (Turkish, English with Kh, English with H). Please choose one style.--92.209.99.54 (talk) 08:43, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I am not sure what you are referring exactly, specify what to change to what or similar, listing the options. Thank You.(KIENGIR (talk) 04:39, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Duplication, transcription 

message: Não acho certo comparar digno com demônio. 2804:248:F206:CE00:C9EF:F2AA:9B89:FC34 (talk) 04:09, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eu
Talk:The God Beneath the Sea

message: Quoting "Development and themes", paragraph three, as I have tweaked it; template  added:
: They shared a concern about recent developments in children's literature and society's attitudes towards children. They felt that older children's literature had been moving closer to adult literature, and that the book had taken them "further than [they'd] ever been taken before" towards that end.
The last clause (bold) is unchanged because I don't know enough to word it more clearly. Probably it means that this book had taken G & B as authors further than before in advancing the recent development in children's literature that concerned them both. If this is true and the meaning is joint we should briefly cover G&B's previous work together. If true separately we should somehow indicate that G & B had separately participated in the development previous to this book together.
If "taken them further" refers to "older children" or to Greek myths then the need for some rewrite is desperate. --P64 (talk) 01:35, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "further than [they'd] ever been taken before" 

message: Quoting the Novels banner above, "This article is currently undergoing a peer review." Evidently that is not true. And there is no substantial comment on the target page, but a request for peer review dated 18 November 2009. (as I understand it -P64)
Technically it is "undergoing" review but that means only that it is on the list Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Peer review#Requests. There is no substantial comment after three years later. In effect it's a request that has been unanswered. --P64 (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer review
Talk:Midgetville

message: Is Midgetville a growth disorder? Jon Harald Søby 08:46, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category 

message: Mr. Treason is dead. This was one of his favorite pages, and that it's been recreated and survived this long without his molestations just goes to show that he's off the air, probably for good now. 68.39.174.238 00:47, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  It's official 

message: This seems to be repeated in three different segments. The New Jersey one seems to be in the source, but I'm not sure it's sourced for the other two.--T. Anthony (talk) 13:07, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: *This article is kind of poor. The Virginia thing seems legit and that there are legends of these others is legitimate, but at times it seems to treat these legends as fact. I'm trying to think how to fix that, but I'm new to the article so uncertain.--T. Anthony (talk) 13:47, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visitors tell stories of hostile midgets who shoot guns at outsiders 
Talk:Airdrop

message: The US Army Air Service made several attempts to drop supplies to the "Lost Battalion" during World War One. 165.91.64.125 (talk) 07:08, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWI experience 

message: I would have thought "airdrop" refers to the dropping of supplies. Surely dropping bombs is "bombing", even if the bomb is deployed from a cargo aircraft using the method of a supply airdrop. Are such missions referred to as 'airdrops' by the air forces that use these cargo-plane-delivered bombs?Catsmeat (talk) 10:07, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dropping Bombs 

message: Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that :File:AirdropcloseJan18haiti edited.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 7, 2011. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2011-09-07. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! howcheng  {chat} 18:09, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:File:AirdropcloseJan18haiti edited.jpg]] to appear as POTD soon 

message: The first bullet point under Methods of Airdrop says "Extraction drops are invariably Low-Velocity airdrops." But the second bullet point under Types of Airdrops says that "LAPES (Low Altitude Parachute Extraction System) is a variation of an HV drop". Either these two statements are contradictory, or I'm confused (which is a real possibility). But I do think it could use some clarification. Jelloice (talk) 05:28, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistent (contradictory) information 

message: Ladies and gentlemen, I wonder if various large-scale object installations done by helicopters qualify as "airdrops", or is there any specific term for them? I'm interested in regard of developing article on this hero pilot. Expert help and relevant linking, anyone? Happy edits, Ukrained2012 (talk) 04:37, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Helicopter-assisted installations? 
Talk:Siirt Airport

message: I came to this article by typing LTCL into the search box. LTCL (Licentiate of Trinity College London) is a music diploma. The two other Trinity diplomas, ATCL and FTCL, redirect to Trinity College London. I think there should be something at the top of this article pointing readers to the Trinity article. I know I've seen something similar at the top of other articles, but I can't remember which ones or what the template was. I'm thinking of something that would say: "LTCL redirects here. For information about the music diploma, see Trinity College London." Can anyone help? Rigaudon (talk) 21:25, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Found it at Wikipedia:Disambiguation. Rigaudon (talk) 22:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  LTCL music diploma
Talk:Kūčios

message: The text says, "Dinner starts when the first star appears in the sky. ... the meal usually begins between six and seven o’clock." That's quite a discrepancy; in Lithuania on December 24, it's dark enough to see the first star by about 4:30 in the afternoon. —Angr 17:51, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  When the meal begins 

message: I think either this article should be merged with Twelve-dish Christmas Eve supper (preferred), or that artilce should be split along national lines and be used only as a disambig (not preferred).  --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 23:13, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Either merge or split 

message: The text omits any mention of traditional usage of hempseed in Lithuania on December 24, whether in the traditional soup or as a seasoning salt. There are academic folkloric sources and recipe books which mention such usage, so it's omission seems rather revisionist in nature. —Sudowite 09:32, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hempseed Traditions 

message: This is not actually in the source that is cited directly afterwards, and the sentence seems pretty out of place, which makes me suspect that it may be vandalism/potty humor. Someone should check whether there is any basis to this. 70.172.194.25 (talk) 19:56, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you for pointing out this nonsense. I checked the source and it says nothing of the sort, so I removed it in this edit. Cukrakalnis (talk) 10:15, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible vandalism
Talk:Return to Dark Castle

message: The current page as at 14 Feb 2008 says: "Another fundamental change to the gameplay from the original games is the ability to crawl left and right while ducking, and this will likely be necessary in order to complete some of the new levels in Return to Dark Castle (as well as find secrets in both new and old levels)."
I recall you could do this in Beyond Dark Castle, at least when ducking at the entrance to low tunnels in the catacombs?
-You are partially correct here, and maybe the article should be edited to reflect this.  However, there *is* a difference in RTDC in that you can crawl *anywhere* in the game now, rather than just in the single situation that you list from BDC.  This affects many other things in the game as well, like being able to find secrets exits and other things, which is why the page lists this as a fundamental change to the gameplay.  Feel free to edit this, though, if you disagree.  Tbone922  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbone922 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crawling isn't a new feature? 

message: please, the page could use it.
What exactly do you want?  The e-mail?  I can forward it to you and then you can put that up if that would be easiest.
Izdale 17:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone get a screenshot of the Decmber 19th screenshot? 

message: The screenshot of the level editor is not displayaing... I think it was removed by one of the bots and needs to be put back up... A similar thing happened on the Color Dark Castle page with the secret room picture where it was removed by a bot, but I undid the changes.  Izdale 20:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Level Editor Screenshot? 

message: Let's stop posting speculation about the release date, eh? I know it's supposed to be soon, but there hasn't been a source cited for the release dates. Once somebody publishes an official date, we'll cite it and put it in there. If there is an official date and I missed it, by all means link to the source. Staecker 01:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Well one of the devs hinted at a september release date on the forum, if you don't believe me check it out 69.181.234.203 20:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think that hints are what we're looking for. Staecker 21:03, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date crystalballing
Talk:Eumycetoma

message: Lancet Infectious Diseases - also actinomycosis doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00359-X JFW | T@lk 14:14, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review 

message: This article lacks a section on the prognosis of this disease, treated and untreated. Would anyone like to write one?--Quisqualis (talk) 08:12, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prognosis section missing
Talk:Paddle tire

message: Hi everyone, I'm going to WP:BOLDly patch this into Off-road tire pretty soon. It lacks sources, formatting, and proper weighting, but it is an important topic. Putting it into Off-road tire will be better for readers and help to make a more direct comparison. -Jergling PC Load Letter 21:01, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you planning to merge all off-road tyres into off-road tire?  If not, why single out this one, fairly obscure, type? Andy Dingley (talk) 21:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  I've been gradually merging the unsourced and redundant offroading articles in as SuggestBot finds them for me. Because of the number of unique colloquialisms in grassroots motorsports, this topic has been duplicated several times. I've already merged/redirected "Mud-terrain tire"(unsourced stub) "Knobby tire"(unsourced, used as skeleton) and "All-terrain tire"(copyvio) for similar reasons. -Jergling PC Load Letter 22:08, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  But the off-road tire article now only represents knobblies, not any other sorts of off-road tire, as if they were the only sort. It certainly doesn't cover all-terrain tyres (which by definition, are designed for tarmac too). If it's covering mountain bike tyres, then it's even worse, as there are (at least) four distinct sorts of knobbly there. Statements like, "Off-road tires are typically radials[2] with thick, deeply grooved tread." are just wrong as a general statement for general off-road tyres: they're the one area where crossplies are still around and off-road tyres are neither all deeply patterned (sand tyres aren't), nor is this always done by grooving, as demonstrated by knobblies. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:26, 1 December 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ok... so find some reliable sources that prove your assertions and edit it. Once again: the articles I merged/redirected into it were completely unsourced/stolen stubs that duplicated what was "Knobby tire" had already said. Clearly, you're contesting a redirect, so I'm not going to act against consensus. -Jergling PC Load Letter 15:42, 2 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge to [[Off-road tire]]
Talk:Fender (vehicle)

message: Shouldn't there be a picture illustrating fenders on a more standard looking modern car? Andrew Nutter  Talk | Contribs  05:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Normal Car

message: This section (under the bicycle and motorcycles section) seems confused.  It talks about the legal requirements for motorcyclists and then implicitly extends this logic to cyclists.  The rule for motorcycles seems perfectly believable but I don't believe it applies to cycles for a minute.  I've never heard of such a rule and surrounding legislation and practice seems to contradict it.
For example, there are many requirements for bikes on sale in the UK that actually go further than what is required to ride on the road - e.g. a bike needs to be sold with a bell, front and wheel reflectors but none of those are legally required to be present when riding on the road (pedal and rear reflectors are).  With this in mind I find it hard to believe that it would be allowable to sell bikes lacking even the equipment needed for them to be considered roadworthy. CrispMuncher (talk) 12:36, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  UK legal requirements 

message: Lyteric, I've removed the references to specific brands of aftermarket fenders for the second time on the basis of advertising.  While I read the material you wrote on cooling effects, and recognize that vented fender designs might result in lower tire/wheel/brake operating temperatures, this is largely irrelevant on consumer vehicles and is not part of typical fender function.
It could easily be argued that based on the edits to this article, but especially when your other edits are considered, that the motiviation for inclusion of this material is promotion of a specific brand of stylish aftermarket fenders.  Wikipedia is not an advertising site. Bradkay (talk) 07:26, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stylish Aftermarket Fenders 

message: Isn't it ambiguous to say Fender (vehicle), shouldn't it rather be something like Fender (vehicle part)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pixelson (talk • contribs) 17:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scope 

message: is it short for "defender" ?
Is this a reliable source:
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=fender
?
the article doesn't mention boats nor fireplaces.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.248.72.23 (talk) 06:52, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  why is it called "fender" ?
Talk:Fusarium venenatum

message: After noticing some mycophiles asking about how a mycoprotein culture is set up, I added a more detailed description of the process to this article, thinking it may be of more interest to biologists and other scientists than it would be to general consumers.
For your amusement, and the curious, I've also added a compare and contrast section on the densities and areas involved. These are based on general figures I found from government agencies and documentation regarding farming standards and the design of the myco culture vessels. I've added them as rough estimate. If anyone out there would like to hit the calculator, biro and back of an envelope to double check them, that'd probably be a good idea; lots of unit changes involved.
I wasn't too sure about producing a cubic volume comparison with caged birds, as I'm not too sure what the regulations are regarding stacking birds. But the area they require is higher than shed birds (250 square centimetres versus 750 square centimetres). I'm guessing that's the case because the open floor birds can jump over each other, whereas the caged ones would probably struggle to do that, so they'll need more area to move between each other.
Why people are talking about eating insects I don't know. That seems to be something of a step in the opposite direction versus the Quorn Tower.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.25.237.116 (talk) 15:43, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Article updates

message: # There is more about the "controversy" than there is about the mould. This is not permitted under the "undue weight" clause of the NPOV policy.
# The "controversy" is nothing to do with the mould as an entity. It doesn't describe it or anything.
# The section is simply repeating the long section in the Quorn article, where, although it is overblown, it is at least somewhat appropriate. Grace Note (talk) 08:50, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: deleted material

message: If the "broth" really is 95% glucose it would be an almost solid sludge. The water content simply must be far higher than indicated here or it couldn't sustain the Fusarium. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:07, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Obvious nonsense 

message: I'd love to see how it looks like. I only noticed that Quorn product is made of this fungus. 188.67.62.140 (talk) 19:24, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: 3 years later, and the situation has not been addressed. Pathetic. 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs an Illustration?
Talk:Fusarium ear blight

message: Removed content which appeared to be copied from these sources: http://www.apsnet.org/edcenter/intropp/lessons/fungi/ascomycetes/Pages/Fusarium.aspx and https://scabusa.org/about. Ida Karlsson (SLU) (talk) 11:38, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyrighted material 

message: I don't think this edit is an improvement. I think we should leave it as a WP link, but change to . Invasive Spices (talk) 17:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Inoculum
Talk:Here We Go Again (1973 TV series)

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Here we go again (TV seires). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Regards, SONIC678 00:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Here we go again (TV seires)" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Helotiales

message: I would like to do a big overhaul of this page as, per the COL, there are about 30 accepted families in Helotiales compared to the 10 cited in the lead section. Yes we all bow to Dictionary of the Fungi 10th edition but it is getting increasingly outdated. I'm aware that this would have a large trickle-down effect as various species would need to be moved to new families/genera. Does anyone have any qualms about starting an overhaul or have additional sources on why the page should stay as it is? Given how much mycological taxonomy has expanded in the last decade, I think it's essential to make sure pages like these are updated frequently. Kazamzam (talk) 15:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bring page in 2022
Talk:Thru the Glass

message: :Image:13s thru the glass.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 00:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:13s thru the glass.jpg