lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ying Yang Twins

message: These two black folks are aware that it's Yin/Yang, and not Ying/Yang?
They probably did it on purpose.
I don't think that the color of their skin is relevant. but i doubt they know or care that it's yin yang. they don't appear to be very bright.
Interesting. Whether they
"appear to be "bright" or not to you, that kind of "personal-attack-type comment seems more suited to gossip pages, not this forum. And for the record, Sylvester Stallone never came across as genius material either, butI don't see those type of comments left on his page...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.6.92 (talk) 22:43, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ying Yang 

message: oh man..do we really need their complete list of songs? 
I would fix it up myself..but my shows are on. getcrunk 00:21, 26 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup 

message: I think something about how they always yell HAAAAAAAAHN would be appropriate for this page.  I'd add it but I don't know why they do it. --Glaze 19:00, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  HAAAAAAAAAHN 

message: It's spelt "Hanh!" after all they have a song of the same name.
* Yeah i've never been good at spelling.--216.64.2.106 21:32, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Haaaaahn" 

message: It says four but there's 5 listed. Thug Walking, USA, Alley, Me and My Brother, Chemically Imbalanced and different versions of M&MB and USA.74.195.3.11 18:30, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Albums 

message: Shouldn't it be noted that these guys preformed on the September 21 episode of WWE Smackdown? 68.54.174.43 01:53, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWE Smackdown 

message: one of "faith no mores" most popular tracks (i don't know which but gets played on radio alot) sounds similar to "collar green" by the ying yang twins.  has anyone else noticed this?
secondly, who is t-rock referring to as "mother****in' wonderboy" and "***** **** boy with no vision" from two of their tracks off of their album (i think),"chemically imbalanced"?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.59.182.78 (talk) 01:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ying Yang Twins/Faith No More
Talk:Paulus Potter

message: The german and the netherland edition of Wikipedia states that Paulus Potter was burried at the 7th of january. In the english article it is the 17th of january. Could someony proof this please ?
:I looked into another Dutch on-line encyclopedia (Winkler Prins). Here it is stated he was buried 17 jan. 1654. Also a general art cyclopedia I have here at home says 17th. Thank you very much, I will change Dutch and German wikipedia. Ellywa 20:04, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Date Of Death
Talk:Acceptance (band)

message: Does anyone know who plays the piano? It's seen in some videos, but doesn't show who plays it. MaxInsanity 02:58, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The following appears to be a review of an indie release by this band: 
*
Followers of this band probably know best, so I leave this in your hands. Dan, the CowMan 17:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Indie album review... This band? 

message: The genre is listed as Alternative Rock; however the first line says they're an Emo band.  Anyone who has listened to them or has seen them know they are in no way an Emo band.  I feel this should be edited and someone with more Wiki experience should look at revising the articles structure. --137.216.83.254 (talk) 06:15, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre and opening sentence
Talk:Chiba Urban Monorail

message: I think it would be quite informative for someone knowledgeable to discuss why Chiba city chose to pursue a monorail system, given the often unsuccessful fate of such systems.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supernova87a (talk • contribs) 00:32, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origins of the monorail
Talk:Haapsalu

message: I have removed the following from the opening paragraph:
 
:"(German and ; , formerly Гапсаль)"
This is not Swedish or German or Russian Wiki. This is English Wiki. Yes, these translations have historical importance, but they belong in the body of the the article with historic context. We don't have "Nieuw Amsterdam" in the opening parapragh of the article for New York or French names for Vietnamese cities. The name now is Haapsalu and has been for many years.
ExRat 20:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The foreign names are included for historical purposes, not contemporary purposes. The alternate names are often encountered in English publications, and including the alternates at or near the top is practically standard on articles about European localities. Instead of trying to change things on an article by article basis, it would be better for you to add your input at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names) Olessi 20:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

text: The general consensus on Wikipedia has been to clearly include the alternate names in or near the intro. As I mentioned before, in the interests of consistency within the project it would be better to discuss changes in naming at WP:NC(GN) instead of changing things on a case by case basis. Olessi 21:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translations
Talk:Narva

message: "Russian residents nowadays are happy with their status as Estonian citizens and live peacefully alongside their compatriots.[15]"
This is clearly POV and link 15 sources an opinion piece. There is no place for this on Wikipedia.
90.191.38.239 (talk) 14:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: POV linking

message: Should we give it? On the one hand, Estonian is the sole official language. On the other, some 90% of inhabitants speak and think of Нарва, not Narva. Thoughts? Biruitorul 07:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The claim that Narva had a Russian majority before WW2 is incorrect. According to 1934 census the share of ethnic Russians in the then city of Narva (including both today's Narva and Ivangorod) was 29.7%. --3 Löwi 19:56, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Russian equivalent

message: has moved the "American English" tag from the talk page to the main article with a hidden message that this needs to be checked by a "language expert". The article is indeed written using American spellings such as "favorable", "center" and "defenses". If there are no objections I propose to restore the tag to its more usual site on the talk page. Tammbecktalk 06:36, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: rather overwrite these few words and we can delete this ugly infoclutter (= template:American English) at all--Estopedist1 (talk) 06:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @ I would have no objection to that. Tammbecktalk 06:55, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  American English
Talk:Paldiski

message: May have been an important harbour for the Russian Baltic Fleet. Harbour and railway were allegedly attacked by a German Marineluftschiff (Imperial Navy Airship) in the night of 1915-09-09/10. http://www.stahlgewitter.com/15_09_10.htm --BjKa (talk) 23:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  History: First World War
Talk:Pärnu

message: : , formerly Пернов, Polish: Parnawa, Latvian: Pērnava
these should be moved to Wiktionary --TarmoK 14:24, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I see no reason why they should be listed. ExRat 12:27, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translations of name 

message: I'll willingly admit to ignorance, but why is it incorrect? What would the correct transliteration be? Safebreaker (talk) 18:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: "Pyarnu" is the correct transliteration of the Russian word "Пярну" - in other words, from the Cyrillic alphabet to the Latin alphabet.  However, "Pärnu" is the city's name in the Estonian language, not "Пярну."  The city name is pronounced the same in both languages, though. --Ericdn (talk) 01:26, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well, if you actually wanted to use the Russian name out of preference, you'd be better off writing "Pernov", as that's the Latin transcription of its Russian name while it was in the Russian Empire. Writing "Pyarnu" for an Estonian city now in 2014 is a bit strange. 173.206.72.241 (talk) 21:50, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect transliteration
Talk:Valga, Estonia

message: Where should wikilinks from pre-1918 history articles point, here or to Valka? I had to turn a redirect to here (at Walk, Livonia) into a disambiguation page, I wonder if that is an OK place to link them? Rain74 06:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd like to recommend to follow the German wikipedia on this subject. There are three articles de:Valga; de:Valka and de:Walk (Stadt) with the latter containing the pre-1918 history. --Gf1961 14:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ups, just saw somebody has reverted Walk, Livonia. Note, that I could offer a rough translation from de, replacing the rather small English ones, if somebody would promise to clean the edges. --Gf1961 14:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valga/Valka and history
Talk:Viljandi

message: Perhaps we should remove the category of castles because the Viljandi Castle article exists. Otoomet (talk) 07:26, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: While I appreciate  thanking me for reverting their panoramic image from the main infobox and appreciate their reasoning this is an article on Viljandi, not an article on Viljandi town hall - therefore, a photo showing Viljandi is preferable to a photo showing a single building in Viljandi on the device I am currently using I personally find a panoramic wide view non natural in that location and smaller than I would expect.  It is an image I can appreciate when displayed in a wide area but gives me a certain amount of shock value (whats that small image doing there) when I come to the article.  Anyway I shall leave it for others consensus to determine if it should remain or not.  MOS:LEADIMAGE may be an appropriate reference.  I am not going to edit war on this and appreciate my color vision is not perfect so I leave this to others.  Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 21:29, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead image
Talk:Jõhvi

message: The date 1241 looks like a mistake. Since hundreds of Danish names are first known from "Valdemar Sejrs Jordebog" also known as "Kong Valdemars Jordebog" (Liber Census Daniæ) from 1231, I can't imagine it being any other work, even more so as 1) Denmark had no similar contemporary work, 2) This census list also covered Danish Estonia and was so detailed it was used in Denmark for 400 years, 3) It is very often misquoted as dating from 1241. His only work dating from 1241 is the Code of Jutland. Valentinian T / C 10:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  First record 
Talk:Rakvere

message: I removed image_skyline http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rakvere_Colage.jpg because it used one of my photos http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarmo888/3053818195/ and I haven't given any permission to use it like that. Please advise how to get that collage deleted from wikipedia entirely. (194.150.65.8 (talk) 10:59, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Now the collage is deleted from [Wikimedia Commons] where it was originaly uploaded. Sorry about the inconveniences. Flying Saucer (talk) 08:18, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Rakvere has a supreme road vehicle system - Hehehe. Supreme. 142.103.92.191
: Yes, that part seems a bit strange in a Wikipedia article. If you strip all the questionable stuff not much is left though: "Rakvere has a road system, with bus stops and taxis. The city centre is small enough to move around on foot." Or something? :) --Jonik 08:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As a matter of fact, when I went there, there were a number of pot holes, so I think we should remove that section completely. Dave 09:23, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was there and walked around extensively for three days just over a week ago. I didn't encounter potholes, though of course I can't claim there aren't any. -- Hoary 10:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Miles M.20

message: Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 19:13, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008 

message: The article states that the M20 fell between the Supermarine Spitfire and Hawker Hurricane in performance.  Actually, if the Hurricane has a Merlin XX too, it is a bit quicker than the M20. JHowardGibson (talk) 17:46, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I have just added a comparison of the Miles M.20 with Hurricanes and Spitfires with equivalent engines.  We need to be careful about comparing new, prototype aircraft with aircraft that are in current production.  . --JHowardGibson (talk) 23:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Performance of Hurricane
Talk:Aa, Estonia

message: Hey all, I'm the WikiProject Cities assessor of this article. If feedback is what you want and need, come to my talk page and give me a holler! --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 23:18, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I restored "Aa Municipality" because vald is municipality, whereas kihelkond is parish. Andres 10:58, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wikification-Too many irrelevant links.
*I only took out the links that were definitely not about the topic.
Eagle (talk) (desk) 02:31, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: at this moment, it is OK--Estopedist1 (talk) 15:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Australian National University

message: It appears this page has been out of date since 2018-2019, when the ANU re-organized its College structure (see https://www.anu.edu.au/about/academic-colleges for the current arrangement). 203.217.53.198 (talk) 11:11, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2018 College re-organization 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :University of Australia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 17#University of Australia until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Matthew hk (talk) 17:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "University of Australia" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: Isn't the motto "Naturam Primum Cognoscere Rerum" a (passive) command: First learn the nature of things rather than as currently stated on the page, a rather bold statement or claim First to learn the nature of things. Cognoscere could be the infinitive "to learn" as translated here but can also be a passive command "learn", which seems to fit better to me at least. Jim Killock (talk) 10:08, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Answering my own question, it comes from Lucretius and misses the verb studeat "(He/she) may study" so should be left as it is. The full phrase would there for be something like (one) may study first to learn the nature of things. Jim Killock (talk) 10:16, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Motto translation
Talk:General Maximilian Veers

message: I removed the sentence that said Veers was Admiral Ozzel's sidekick. An Imperial Army general isn't a "sidekick" to an Imperial Navy admiral. They are the same rank and in different branches. Maybe what was meant was something like "counterpart", but either way it's not necessary; Veers outlived Ozzel by a long time, and there's no reason to lump them together in the introductory paragraph. Kafziel 15:52, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sidekick?? 

message: The style in which this page is written is absurd.  It reads like some sort of early 19th century ode to a French military hero. Needs to be edited a lot. Oldkinderhook 19:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing Style 

message: I have redirected this uncited collection of plot summary to the appropriate Star Wars character list. --EEMIV (talk) 13:32, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Weißenburg in Bayern/Archive 1

message: Should use the English spelling of "Bavaria" and the standard "town, state" format. From the entry on the WP:RM page. Mark 14:45, 11 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
*Support. Mark 14:45, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Add any additional comments
===Descision===
It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 07:16, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: It was requested that this article be renamed but there was no consensus for it be moved. Ryan Norton T | @ | C 07:16, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Descision

message: I have expanded the article based on the German version and on a tourist history booklet I brought home with me from my trip there. It's a nice city and if it is to become a pawn in an argument about spelling I think it deserves more than a three-line article. It would also be nice to include the pictures from the German version. Edinborgarstefan 09:12, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job! I added the picture of the city hall. We should probably add the others as well. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 23:50, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion of article 

message: I reverted the anon's edits because he is making weird changes like inserting   here and there and because I feel he should discuss it on the talk page before changing the spelling of the principal author - who is now User:Edinborgarstefan.
He does, of course, have a point that while the article is located at the 'ss' spelling it would be most natural to use that spelling throughout. See the ongoing edit war at Ubeda for more thoughts on this. 
Currently I read three votes on this talk page for moving the article to the native spelling (WP:RM suggests we use approval voting). - Haukur Þorgeirsson 13:53, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, currently there are only three votes opposing move to Weissenburg, Bavaria. Mark 13:58, 12 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: And all of them say it should be at Weißenburg in Bayern so following the principles of approval voting the statement of Haukur is correct. Edinborgarstefan 14:52, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

text: Lets just concentrate on one vote at a time. Mark 05:13, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  The current edit war 

message: No-one is actually supporting a move to "Weissenburg, Bavaria" anymore. That was an innocent misunderstanding. The question now is whether we should move it to Weißenburg in Bayern in accordance with the article title Weißenburg-Gunzenhausen. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 19:13, 15 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Clarification of current move debate
Talk:Frieda Hughes

message: I added the copyvio tag... the poem is not in the public domain. Am I wrong ? --Raistlin 09:55, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: This claims that Carol was ted Hughes's third wife.  Other places, I've seen her considered his second since he never married Assia.  True?
:Yes, Carol was his second wife; Hughes didn't have a third. I'm going to fix the article. ErikaSwiberg 05:40, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Third wife? 
Talk:Exercise hypertension

message: What does "exercising at 100 W" mean???  You ought to provide this information!
83.168.75.9 (talk) 07:28, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: note

message: I recently had a nuclear EKG stress test, where they did an EKG as I exercised and then took pictures of my heart.  They also did blood pressure checks immediately after exercise.  Should we add a paragraph that such a test exists?  (I came out fine, thank you, just out of shape.) Simesa 12:16, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: I

message: I don't know what Journals those references are from. Perhaps the original author could more fully describe his or her references? J. Finkelstein 22:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks a lot, it looks good! But what link did you follow to find that? OOoohh, I see, the links on the talk page. Great work :) . J. Finkelstein 22:19, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  References
Talk:Jon Gries

message: The article states that he eats little red meat, only in the next sentence to say he's a vegetarian.
User: Coffee and TV
Not a vegetarian.  
In a radio interview on KTCK 1310-AM, he said that the vegetarian label was a rumor that came of his spitting out the steak after the cuts.  The reason for his refusal to swallow the steak was because the steak had been repeatedly reheated (noting the low-budget nature of the film).  He said that it was a steak that he wouldn't serve to his worst enemy.
--JohnNAllen 19:35, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Vegetarian?

message: Didn't Gries appear, as a 9-year-old child actor (his first-ever acting job), alongside William Shatner in an episode of Star Trek in which everyone on a certain planet dies at the age of 30? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:11, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Appearance in ''Star Trek''
Talk:List of countries by native names

message: The List of countries by native names lists all countries included in the List of countries in an alphabetical order. 
Please do not start here any discussion on including an entity, but choose for that Talk:List of countries. - Electionworld 12:52, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I deleted a lot of additions, which were unofficial names for countries on the list of countries (e.g. Cornish is not an official national language of the UK) or were native names for entities not listed on the list of countries (e.g. Lower Saxony). Electionworld 21:26, 19 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I would like to change the vertical "List by country" navigational box on the right of this page to a horizontal one at the bottom. Please discuss at Template talk:Lists by country. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 12:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "List by country" navigational box 

message: A discussion has been started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries/Lists of countries which could affect the inclusion criteria and title of this and other lists of countries.  Editors are invited to participate. Pfainuk talk 11:46, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: New Discussion

message: This list needs sorting out, at present it does not mention the fact non sovereign entities are included on the list, it also says only entities from list of countries are included, but that original list no longer exists and it is now a redirect to list of sovereign states. 
There is also the problem with sovereign states, territories, disputed sovereign states, non sovereign entities all being in line with each other.  Changes are needed. BritishWatcher (talk) 11:23, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Introduction and criteria for inclusion