Talk:Cryptoclidus

message: Quick work! Page looks loads better like that.
I'm a bit concerned about the dino stub tag, tho', as this beast is/was not a dinosaur. - Ballista 21:18, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, I didn't know it wasn't a dinosaur.  When someone removed the dinosaur tag and replaced it with the reptile tag I asked why and never got any response, so I replaced it.  ONUnicorn 13:32, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Turns out I did get a response, just didn't notice it. ONUnicorn 13:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

text: Hmm, looks like the image here is Nessie and not a real plesiosaur after all. See the last paragraph here  Dinoguy2 (talk) 07:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:53, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Cryptoclidus.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: For more info on the taxonomic history of Cryptoclidus and its constituent species, see Brown (1981).
Brown, David S.; 1981. The English Upper Jurassic Plesiosauroidea (Reptilia) and a review of the phylogeny and classification of the Plesiosauria; Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Geology; 35(4) pp.253-347. 83.206.236.228 (talk) 20:38, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Species list 

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Cryptoclidus's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Bensonetal12":
From Anningasaura: 
From Meyerasaurus: 
From Plesiosauria: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 16:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Cryptoclidus]] 

message: Was Cryptoclidus really 8 metres? I thought it was 5 metres. Also wouldn't an 8 metre Cryptoclidus weigh only 1.5 tonnes since it is over half the length of a 14 metre Elasmosaurus, which weighs 3-4 tonnes?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.135.58.111 (talk) 12:38, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Cryptoclidus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080918220040/http://www.dinosauria.com/dml/names/ples.html to http://www.dinosauria.com/dml/names/ples.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: For some reason when I added an image to the Paleobiology section it was pushed down to the Classification section, but I see no reason for this phenomenon. Could someone try to find out why this happened and fix it? Thanks. --Slate Weasel (talk | contribs) 01:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, it's because a picture that is on an "earlier level" has been pushed past the new picture you added by the taxobox. So your new image gets pushed below the upper image. FunkMonk (talk) 08:32, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image Moving to Wrong Section