lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Distillation Design

message: Can I have some basic knowledge about the designing of fractionaters(distillers) which is free of cost! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 221.132.113.146 (talk • contribs) 26 March 2007(UTC)
:Assuming that you want design information about industrial fractionation, such designs must really be done by an experienced chemical engineer. There are textbooks, including the one this article describes, in any good university library and you could study them free of cost ... but it is not a subject that you can self-learn. In the future, please sign your messages as explained above.  Regards, - mbeychok 23:09, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Want some basic knowledge free of cost
Talk:Un Certain Regard

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 18:42, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: How do you determine the nationality of the recipient? For example, Things You Can Tell Just by Looking at Her, is listed as Colombian, but the movie page (and most of the actors) mentions US as the country of origin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 148.87.19.198 (talk) 17:56, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Nationality of Recipient

message: The lists are giving undue weight to the Nationality of Recipient, especially so with all the flag icons. To say the least, this goes against the grain of this section. The Prize goes to a person and his film, not to his country. It's not like in the Olympic Games, and these lists look like international sport events, instead of the Un Certain Regard of the Cannes Film Festival. Hoverfish Talk 17:52, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationality and flags 

message: Was it introduced in 1978 by Gilles Jacob? Cos the rest of the article indicates 1998.
84.67.116.161 (talk) 07:51, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  1978 or 1998?
Talk:Kilbeggan Distillery

message: Right there are references to back up that it claims to be the oldest licensed distillery in the world, but it is very well documented that Bushmills was licensed in 1608, over a hundred years earlier, and hence this claim has nothing to stand on. Now what do we do about it in this article? The museum site makes the claim, even though it is obviously untrue, but the claim is officially made. Ben W Bell talk 18:45, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it claims to be the oldest because there is uncertainty in regard to the Bushmills claim. A license was granted to a distiller in Bushmills in 1608, but not necessarily to the actual current Bushmills distillery. i.e. it could have been a different distillery in the Bushmills area. Everytime (talk) 17:55, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

text: But there are only links to support the claiming of it, nothing here to support the actuality of it. I think we need to go further into this, but without crossing into Original Research territory. Canterbury Tail talk 12:39, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

text: So if we know a license was granted in the Bushmills ares in 1608 then Kilbeggan cannot claim to be the world's oldest licensed distillery if one was licensed about 150 years prior. Canterbury Tail talk 22:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Oldest licensed distillery

message: I note "licenced distillery" in the text, but "licensed distillery" in these comments. The S-form would be correct in the UK, but which is correct in Irish English? 86.135.7.189 (talk) 14:48, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: British English form would be correct. Canterbury Tail talk 16:26, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling?
Talk:Oriental Park Racetrack

message: So what happened to the racetrack in our days? --Qyd (talk) 03:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Present

message: Ralph Blumenthal in his book about the Stork Club says there were auto races there after WW1 with the Stork doorman having won one in a Cadillac in 1920 2604:2D80:ED08:A00:D8DC:87E6:3F10:9ACF (talk) 22:55, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Auto Races?
Talk:Samuel Tertius Galton

message: Pearson writes in Life, letters and labour of Francis Galton that Samuel Tertius died on October 23rd, 1844. Is there any source for the date in the article? Herve1729 (talk) 13:13, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: ODNB doesn't have an entry for Samuel Tertius, but there is one for his son, Francis. The latter's entry speaks of Francis's father dying " in the autumn of 1844", but doesn't give a more precise date. Find a Grave (not always the most reliable source) also shows "October 23, 1844" <https://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=pv&GRid=126528447>. So Pearson is quite likely to be correct. --NSH001 (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no doubt in fact that Pearson is correct, his biography of Galton is very well-documented. Herve1729 (talk) 07:07, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of death
Talk:Wine and Spirit Trade Association

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 18:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Bedhampton Schools

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 18:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: I have assessed this article giving it a rating of Stub / Low. For future improvement this article needs an infobox and more information on the school today - history is already well covered. Camaron1 | Chris 19:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Association of Small Direct Wine Merchants

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 18:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Ray Lankester

message: In the paragraph listing the extraordinary number of top biologists whom Ray met in his father's house, it is poor practice to list their full names, because that is so cumbersome and gets in the way of the reading process. Since we have the link system, any reader who doesn't know who, say, Clifford is can soon find out. That is the whole point of links.
The same person changed 'his German was good, and he could read the language fluently' to 'his German was fluent'. Of course there is a big difference between reading and speaking a foreign language: I have no reference at present on his speaking German, and will return this. Meanwhile, I've taken the comment out.
The same person changed 'whilst still a child' to 'while still a child'. The original version is correct.
Such a large number of changes should not have been made without a) better justification, and b) reasons fully explained. 
I have also diluted the suggestion that he was the model for Challenger, following reasons given by another contributor.
Macdonald-ross (talk) 17:01, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some explanations of changes 

message: Much as I respect Lankester's exceptional contribution, am I the only one who thinks it is a little harsh to refer to Fletcher as a 'relative nonentity'. I have not edited this, but perhaps the original writer might consider whether this can be rephrased or justified... 89.240.110.205 (talk) 02:35, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I have examined their track records by looking at their Royal Society nomination papers ( and  for Lankester;). There is no question that Lankester's track record was streets ahead, and we know from Punch and other periodicals that he was wellknown to the general reading public. Add to that Fletcher never held a single post outside the museum, had no publications at all in the biological sciences, not even palaeontology, and was Thomson's chosen man, no doubt because he would kow-tow to Thomson's will... Lankester, on the other hand, held important posts in two universities, published massively, had Charles Darwin's signature on his FRS application... The public debate about the row conclusively proved who was the better known to the educated public. And relative nonentity is what Fletcher was. It is not a judgement on him as a human being; just the truth about their relative visibility as scientists. Why be mealy-mouthed? Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:50, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lazarus Fletcher 

message: This section seems redundant. Most of the items are in the Publications section. I suggest moving those that aren't to Publications and deleting the Individual Workd section. Kognos (talk) 21:44, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual Works
Talk:The Point of No Return

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 18:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: I've moved all of these song pages to the Phantom of the Opera Wiki. In particular, if anyone is interested in adding information about this song, they can find its article here.
:--Tiria (talk) 05:37, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Song pages
Talk:Valtra

message: Should be pointed out here that some of the tractors are the same as the Massey Ferguson (compare MF 4400 and the Valtra A series for example), made in the same factory in Finland and only have a little difference in external bodywork.
My thoughts anyway.
A Taxed Mind (talk) 15:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  AGCO ownership and Massey Ferguson
Talk:MG XPower SV

message: Its not a supercar. It was never in full production so its a prototype or concept. Furthermore, even if it were in production it still would not be a supercar. A supercar is more than just looks and performance. It has to be made by a supercar maker, ie: Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porsche, etc. Vaccari & Bosi and MG Rover are not supercar makers and never have been, even if it is based on Qvale Mangusta, as that is not a supercar either, only the name name Mangusta comes from old De Tomaso Mangusta, it was not made by De Tomaso.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.19.157.52 (talk) 16:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't much like the looks of those cars myself, but can we stay away from homophobic comments, please? For what it's worth, I think "supercar" is such a vague term anyway that we're better off avoiding it altogether - except, of course, where a source has used the term themselves. Loganberry (Talk) 23:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Class Supercar 

message: The three pictures in this article are not copyright. They were taken by me on my Nokia 6680 camera phone on 07/05/2006 and uploaded to Wikipedia with the 'I the creator release into the public domain' copyright tag. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Violentbob (talk • contribs) 14:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright status of pictures in this article 

message: Most of the MG X-Power WR article actually covers the SV and hence duplicates this article. I suggest the WR could and should be covered in this article. Letdorf (talk) 13:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there have been no objections, I've now done this. Letdorf (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Piruz Dilanchi

message: I don’t think that the info about irredentist movement in Iranian Azerbaijan and its leaders should be suppressed in Wikipedia. The reader has a right to know about them. Grandmaster 19:00, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  I am sure you are aware of Wikipedia's notability policy. If you believe this article should exist, then please provide third party sources which show that he is notable --Rayis 19:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oppose to deletion 

message: Some claims need third party sources.  Thus I put the  back in.  --alidoostzadeh 23:25, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some claims 

message: I've removed the NPOV template, please use  or better yet  for sentences, then detail issues here. This will help address them in a timely manner. - RoyBoy 23:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text:  Is the current tagged COI correct? Aztap (talk) 22:02, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV removed 
Talk:VK Jug

message: I have added year of establishment and two missing national cups (in 1990s) in "Accomplishments"
Z0r04st3r 19:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Accomplishments
Talk:Gallery of the Sistine Chapel ceiling

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 19:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message
Talk:Sir Robert Anstruther, 5th Baronet

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
I am moving this page.--Vintagekits 19:48, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Note that while we don't have a link for him yet, Robert Anstruther is also the name of a Member of Parliament for Anstruther Burghs (surprise!), a younger son of Sir John Anstruther, 2nd Baronet. Choess 23:42, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name of this article
Talk:Robert Grimston, 1st Baron Grimston of Westbury

message: His father is called "the Hon[ourable] and Rev[erend]" in this biography but he was a grandson of a peer and not a peer's son - surely the Honourable is incorrect? (All the other Hons and Revs I have heard of were peer's sons.)Cloptonson (talk) 10:36, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Father's title
Talk:Johannes Peter Müller

message: There was a request for examples regarding the lead section's statement that Müller was "known for his discoveries but also for his ability to synthesize knowledge."  I removed the request, and note here two examples stated in the body:  his application of discoveries in physical science to physiology, and his law of specific energies. Bob Burkhardt (talk) 19:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Examples
Talk:Russell Brain, 1st Baron Brain

message: Why is the Baronetcy Wikiproject interested in this one?  He was created a Baron, not a Baronet. === Vernon White (talk) 18:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: He was knighted in 1952, made a baronet in 1954, and in 1962 created Baron Brain - Kittybrewster  (talk) 19:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Baronet?
Talk:Samuel Montagu, 1st Baron Swaythling

message: Montagu's will was the subject of some controversy.  You ought to have more about it in your article.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.162.253.101 (talk) 21:18, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More about the will 

message: "In 1899 the proposals were rejected and Montagu subsequently gave £10,000 (equivalent to £1033,000 in 2017)" 
In the brackets it should read:   £ 1,033,000
--78.94.54.246 (talk) 09:23, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: ....and 5 years later it is still wrong and just as irritating. Can't anyone fix it? Rustygecko (talk) 12:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Seperator" is wrong 

message: A note for passing researchers, but unworthy of comment in the main text. In a Corney & Barrow order book (Guildhall Library, MS 11779) are records of orders, such in May 1891, Port, 1887 Thompson & Croft, 20 dozen for Samuel Montagu MP, he taking another 10 dozen in July 1891. (In my book Port Vintages, forthcoming.) JDAWiseman (talk) 11:18, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wine Order
Talk:Royal Automobile Association

message: Bot identified the article as needed cleanup and put the relevant maintenance tags. Please fix the identified problems. If you think the maintenance tags were put in error then just revert the bot's edits. If you have any questions please contact the bot owner.
Yours truly AlexNewArtBot 19:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Cleanup message

message: This article reads like one big advert for the RAA. Most of the article comes straight from the RAA website. Ozdaren (talk) 11:59, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  One big advert for the RAA
Talk:Fredi

message: Alfred Hernando, the retired Valencian pilota player and businessman, used the nickname Fredi. Eventually, many pilotaris are mostly known by their surnames or family alias. In the case of Fredi, it comes from his name, so I think it's right that he appears on this list. --Casaforra (parlem-ne) 19:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alfred Hernando
Talk:Sir Austin Hudson, 1st Baronet

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Sir Chaloner Ogle, 1st Baronet

message: Who is this Chaloner Ogle, Esq, died 12 June 1814, aged 90. Catherine Ogle, died 16 January 1820, aged 83. Late of the Royal Navy.
 Broichmore (talk) 10:16, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , I am connected, through marriage, to Sir Chaloner Ogle, 1st Baronet. All I can tell you about the other Chaloner Ogle, mentioned on the memorial plaque, is this. He was Chaloner Ogle, born 1725, died 1814 and was married to Catherine, daughter and heiress of J. Solley. He was the son of Henry Ogle of Newcastle and Isabella Baxter, and was descended from Henry Ogle of Kirkley. He was also first cousin of Sir Chaloner of Worthy, whose page is here. Since he does not have his own page on wp, and was only a cousin of the 1st Baronet, I don't think this can go any further, can it? Anne (talk) 12:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  Not really, but thanks for the ID. --Broichmore (talk) 15:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Chaloner Ogle (1725-1814)
Talk:Basilica of Mary, Queen of the Universe

message: Should this also be in the church category? Kopf1988 19:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classify as a church too? 
Talk:Supermarine Sea Otter

message: Surely it was an amphibian, rather than a flying boat? The picture clearly shows wheels.Manormadman (talk) 15:41, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Amphibian

message: Took part in Korean War in 1950-51 about HMS Theseus.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.112.238.223 (talk) 07:52, 23 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Korean War 

message: Working on the article over the next few days, and I would like to make the citation style similar to other Supermarine articles, many of which are now GA. Please ping me to comment. Amitchell125 (talk) 19:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations
Talk:Āytam

message: The article claims, without any reference or proof, "Its resemblance to the three dots that were found on shields in mediaeval times, and the similarity of the name āytham to the word āyutham meaning 'weapon' or 'tool' has resulted in it often being called āyutha ezhuthu (literally, 'the war-weapon letter')". This is patently wrong. The Tolkappiyam says it is ஆய்த எழுத்து and not அயுத எழுத்து. The meaning and import is quite different. If somebody makes a mistake of calling it āyutham, should it be repeated here?ā--Aadal 19:13, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: untitled

message: This: "...(1) it occurred after a short vowel and before a stop (voiceless), and its place of articulation is like that of the stop. In other words, ... assimilates to the following voiceless stop" seems to indicate that the aytam denotes gemination of the following sound. Does it?Nagakura shin8 (talk) 03:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gemination?
Talk:Derrick Gunston

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming
Talk:Edward Cust

message: See From WP:NCNT#Other_non-royal_names#4:
:Baronets, as they hold hereditary titles, often for a large part of their lives, follow the same practice as hereditary peers and should have their title noted in the beginning of the article. The format is Sir John Smith, 17th Baronet. For the article title, this format should only be used when disambiguation is necessary; otherwise, the article should be located at John Smith. John Smith, 17th Baronet should never be used with the postfix and without the prefix.
Therefore this articles name should be changed.--Ginggangsgoolies 20:44, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming 
Talk:Sir Francis Blake, 1st Baronet, of Tillmouth Park

message: Hi Dave, do I take it that this article will not be expanded from your recent edit, i.e. removing the citation tag? And if it is to be expanded, it will containe only one source? Articles must be referenced, as you know, and tags should only be removed when citations have been requested. I may of course be wrong, and in that case, could you post a link for the relavent policy on this, thanking you in advance, regards --Domer48 10:32, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Everything on the article page as it stands at present can be found in the source provided, which is exemplary. That does not mean it cannot be expanded further with new sources provided. There is no Wikipedia requirement to provide umpteen different sources which all say the same thing. If this were an article which had contentious comment, it might requre some alternative source material, but that is not the case here. Maybe you should have a look at some other WP articles such as Francisco Franco where very many seriously contentious and heresay things are up on the page without any obvious citations. David Lauder 12:03, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I see what you mean, re article, but is there not section tags there for that? Rather than tagging the whole article which has considerable referneces. You are quite right though about not having to provide umpteen different sources, but I consider the ones that are there should be referenced? This could after all, be cited by some editors as a precedent, and then we would have policies coming out left right and centre. And since it is only one source  Since the article is not contentious, and the article being small, surly it could be done quite easly? Thanks --Domer48 12:15, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding article