lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Jackson 5

message: The band members who weren't a part of the family (ex. Reynaud Jones) should probably be added to the band members section, at least in my opinion Mighty Midas (talk) 20:04, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes they should because I saw the Jacksons live this year and Taryll and TJ were performing alongside Marlon Jackie and Tito. I’m not real familiar with that Jones person. 2601:481:8600:5260:B06F:E5D4:130E:C38C (talk) 07:16, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band members 

message: I just saw a YouTube video of the Johnny Carson show and one of the brothers said it was Diana Ross that discovered them at an event in Gary Indiana and said she wanted to take them to Motown.
So that counts out Gladys Knights involvement. 107.77.236.139 (talk) 19:02, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gladys Knight discovering them 

message: — Assignment last updated by JoycelynnC3 (talk) 18:25, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Black American Music 209

message: What exactly does this mean? Can this be made more specific? I assume it means across races in the US, but even this isn't quite specified. But are they among the first for a specific sort of music (pop, but maybe not well-defined comparing historically), or is 'among' here doing a lot of work? Duke Ellington, Ella Fitzgerald, Louis Armstrong, Eartha Kitt, Nat King Cole, Chuck Berry, Little Richie, et al had very large followings across the racial divide ages beforehand - we can arguably even go back to Scott Joplin (if less so as a performer).
If this can't be made more specific, should this vague and potentially misleading sentence be removed? Harsimaja (talk) 20:31, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a self-evidently ludicrous statement for one thing, and I highly doubt anyone could find a decent source to justify it. I say get rid of it. 2600:8801:710D:EA00:D57C:4116:6EEB:F99B (talk) 20:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The group were among the first African American performers to attain a crossover following." 

message: {To change to jackson 5-6} 2601:805:8682:2AD0:D050:7A7D:6787:CD21 (talk) 20:00, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:03, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 28 February 2024 

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dS6lw2DbcVI&t=70s
I edited the page to indicate Jermaine Jackson stated during the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame acceptance speech that Gladys Knight was the first to reach out to the Jackson 5 to get them to Motown. Comprendo (talk) 18:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add the youtube link below as a citation
Talk:Cristóbal de Morales

message: Paul McCreesh's recording of Cristóbal de Morales's Missa Mille Regretz's is a beautiful work. I think it is the requiem for felipe II, but I am unsure.
:Yes, I have that recording too.  Really superb.  I can't find out anything about the circumstances of its composition, except that he wrote it in 1544. Antandrus 02:46, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've uploaded and linked to my realisation of Parce mihi Domine from the Officium Defunctorum. It's not perfect, but I hope that it's better than not having anything. --Kay Dekker (talk) 22:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound file
Talk:Legends!

message: I think the section violates several Wikipedia guidelines, including:
*Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources (WP:NPS)--"In Wikipedia articles, quotes of any original texts being discussed should be relevant to the discussion (or illustrative of style) and should be kept to an appropriate length";
*Verifiablity (WP:VERIFY)--"Editors should provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged, or the material may be removed.";
*Possible copyright violation (WP:COPY) -- "If you use part of a copyrighted work under "fair use", or if you obtain special permission to use a copyrighted work from the copyright holder under the terms of our license, you must make a note of that fact (along with names and dates)."
* Violation of "Undue Weight" (WP:UNDUE)-- "Neutrality requires that the article should fairly represent all significant viewpoints that have been published by a reliable source, and should do so in proportion to the prominence of each."
Given the above, I propose to delete the entire section under "Collins Diary" and include, instead, a brief paragraph about the diary and Collins' thoughts, as printed in an article in the Daily Mail, July 14, 2007, titled "Battle of the Superbitches". (Not on-line, I got it through Lexis-Nexis.) I also propose to search for anything Evans may have said, in a Reliable Source (of course). I'll wait at least a few days before I do anything. JeanColumbia (talk) 13:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Collins Diary section

message: Feel free to comment at Talk:Legend (disambiguation)#Merger proposal.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:33, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 
Talk:Wool, Dorset

message: is it worth adding something about the proximity to monkey world? 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monkey_World  as  on the website it gives it as the nearest railway statio
--Dr noire 17:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nearby Attractions 

message: According to my data digging, the Woolbridge Manor House is from the early 1600s, see:  &  --Gunnar (talk) 20:38, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Woolbridge Manor House
Talk:604 Records

message: The article lists a number of artists that are perhaps not all notable and redlinked. Merging some of these articles will perhaps add further notability to this page. Case in point is Armchair Cynics who currently do not pass WP:MUSIC with one EP and and two released album, one of which is self-released. Karst (talk) 14:38, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Redirected. SSTflyer 13:23, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: So 604Records has a comedy label and ambient Intraset (imprint?), but not sure what wording to add to article. (Intraset possibly lower priority as their releases seem to be digital-only)
Homepage of 604 Records has "604 Group" section at bottom with links including "Comedy Here Often?" website and "Intraset"(or is that "INTRASET"?) website. https://comedyhereoften.com/about/ says "The funny child of 604 Records"/"Comedy Here Often? started in 2015 when 604 Records CEO Jonathan Simkin saw the need to create more space for Canadian comedians". Article at Vancouver Sun says "604 Records’ family includes"...""the Comedy Here Often? comedy label, ambient/instrumental Intraset imprint". EarthFurst (talk) 08:21, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  604's comedy label and Intraset
Category talk:Jazz musicians

message: I intend to restore the links to the Jazz musicians category which were removed and replaced with a link to an instrumental subcategory. I think that there is a need for a general category – if you're reading an article about a jazz organist, for example, you may well want to read about players of other instruments, so having a general category saves a step. My impression of the value of a general category may well be coloured by my having supplied hundreds (sic) of links to the general category. If you think the general links should be removed, please let me know. John FitzGerald 03:21, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It would be nice if links from subcategories would automagically show up in the parent category, but for some reason that doesn't happen. It's a good idea to have a general list for the reason you mention, but there should be an easy way to do it. -- mako 06:43, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

text: And why does Miles have his own category to himself? -- mako 06:56, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Two-level solution
Talk:Mexican Standoff

message: I gave a much clearer definition and entirely removed the potentially offensive overtones and references. The expression certainly has currency- it's been around for at least fifty years, probably much longer and I do hear it from time to time (using a reference from popular culture, the culmination of the coffee shop scene in the movie Pulp Fiction is a spot-on example of a Mexican standoff and I've heard it referred to as such many times). However, I believe this would be more appropriate as a dictionary entry. Wyss 83.115.5.209 03:49, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Denmark in World War II

message: The article states several times, that “the majority of the volunteers came from the German minority in Denmark” but as the article ALSO notes, only 1500 of the 6000 volunteers were of the German minority.
(The Danish Waffen SS contingent had a rather broad recruiting base. Some were Nazis, some were anti communists, some were looking for work and some were looking for adventure.)
Likewise, the article selectively quotes a Danish author about the relationship of the Frikorps to the general population. While the relationship might have been “ice cold” in 1943, at other times the relationship was different. In 1941 for example, when it looked like Germany might win the war, the Danish Waffen SS corps not only enjoyed official encouragement and support, but also had a far better relationship to the Danish society in general, than in 1943.
192.38.143.215 (talk) 14:15, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with the Frikorps Danmark part 

message: Right in the beginning of the article, it is stated that over 3000 Danes lost their lives during the occupation.
However, looking at the source of that figure, it’s immediately obvious that this figure involves everything from people killed during the post occupation Soviet bombing of Bornholm, people killed by Allied bombings, extrajudicial killings, etc. etc.
Heck, almost half of the 3000 killed, comes from Danish sailors who died during the war (1200). Its rather unencyclopedic and misleading to mix figures like this. I suggest that the sentence is either expanded and clarified, or deleted altogether.
192.38.143.215 (talk) 14:37, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: In the sections headed 'Invasion' and 'Hardship and the end the war' I have raised citation needs against stated casualty figures where none is given. I note that the article Casualties of World War II main table does not list any figures for military dead although this article states 16 Danish Army soldiers were killed (section Invasion) and 43 were killed or injured during the invasion in a later section.Cloptonson (talk) 13:19, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dubious casualty figures 

message: https://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ww2peopleswar/stories/20/a4000320.shtml  <-- this would fall under Primary Source, but it may be backed up in other RS's with similar accounts - or, if used with some caution, might benefit the article, as there are no details about the British temporary occupation of Denmark 50.111.51.247 (talk) 10:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  possible sources (with care)
Category talk:Specification languages

message: Is Formal Methods really a subcategory of specification langauges? Shouldn't this be the other way around, with specification languages a subcategory of the formal methods category? Swapping it for now, someone can change it back if there's a good reason that it should be this way that I lack the knowledge to see. Leland McInnes 06:05, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree.—Ashley Y 08:04, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Disagree. Not all spec languages are formal methods (UML being a prime example), and not all "formal methods" are particularly useful a spec languages (although that doesn't prevent some folks from trying). I think they're better off as separate but parallel categories. --Allan McInnes (talk) 05:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds fine. The nesting seeemed odd to me. Separate categories is a much better option. Leland McInnes 17:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categories backwards?
Talk:Port Melbourne

message: I've written up some history on Port Melbourne, but there's so much more to add: its relation to Melbourne's postwar immigration history, the Port Melbourne Lighthouse, information about the docks, Garden City, Fishermans Bend, etc. Cnwb 05:18, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)

message: There are multiple references to "Fishermens Bend" - a name that appears to have been consigned to "historical" status on 18 May 1977, and officially replaced with "Fishermans Bend" (http://services.land.vic.gov.au/vicnames/place.html?method=edit&id=15591).
The local government authority for the area (http://www.portphillip.vic.gov.au) consistently uses the "Fishermans Bend" name. Kapunda 14:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but it has no official status - there are plenty of these around Melbourne. The Gazetteer of Australia recognises the name, but not as an official one, and the Melway notes its inclusion in Port Melbourne. Back in 2006, it had an article of its own, but we found it could only be improved so far. The article subsequently got merged in (I think) Nov 2006, and what you see there is almost exactly the complete article. Some local names do eventually become official names - for example, Gardenvale, whose dual status has been confusing us all for months. Orderinchaos 17:15, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Ah, I get what you mean - the spelling. Yes, it should be -mans, not -mens. I hadn't noticed that it had been misspelt. Orderinchaos 06:59, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fishermans Bend neighbourhood name 

message: Map sucks. Needs larger - whole island - location map. If you want to show city limits and major roads, go ahead and add suburb and neighborhood names. I say screw WP maps, they all suck -- replace them with Google or Bing insets. 71.164.227.51 (talk) 03:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 
Talk:Palais-Royal

message: Palais-Royal is correct. Palais Royal is an okay approximation. --Wetman 06:12, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: French Wikipedia gives a starting date of 1624 instead of 1629. Any sound reference to support one date over the other? --Wetman 18:11, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: French Wiki states also that Philippe II of Orleans (Louis' nephew) inherited the Palais-Royal from his father, Philippe I (Louis' brother).  I'm afraid I messed about with the page for half-an-hour changing the relationship back and forth. I think it is correct now. 
Certainly Philippe I (Monsieur) lived there with his brother, Louis, during their minority. But nowhere in either article (Eng or Fr) is there a date quoted for a formal handover to the Orleans family. Quite possibly, they just 'hung around' when Louis moved on, and what started as an informal arrangement only became officially formalised when Philippe II was allowed to 'inherit' what may or may not have been his father's to bequeath. Another reference required?
--Redpaul 15:59, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which Philippe? 

message: Will take up the discussion here rather than in the body of the article.  What is at all dubious about the translation?  Sounds right to me.  Unless there is objection from a literate native speaker of Parisian French, which I admittedly am not, I'd say that the "dubious" tag should go.  75.201.128.65 (talk) 23:29, 21 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Me too. We've discussed it, as asked, & I'm removing the tag. Johnbod (talk) 00:39, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dubious" translation? 
Talk:Valech Report

message: "One woman was raped in prison and four women were pregnant at the time of their arrest and were tortured; their children were considered "direct victims". Victims were detained for six months, on average." This makes it sound as if only one woman had been raped; however, rape was extremely common during torture, and the testimony of victims often details this. The wording of this sentence is in general odd. Was this by any chance meant to be about a child conceived as a result of rape during detention? (A notable case of that sort resulted in a miscarriage, but it can't have been the only one.) Feketekave (talk) 18:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Pristino (talk) 01:25, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wording
Talk:Online dating

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: MOVED.  Hadal (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Online dating service →  – WP:CONCISE as the article details both the method in general as well as the services. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs)  07:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 14 March 2023
Talk:Tokyo Metropolitan Government Building

message: I just wanted to note that the height of the building is reported as 243m, not 248, on the official site of the Metro. Gov't. Tomos 06:42, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what you are saying...are you saying that the official government site shows a height of 248m?  Perhaps you should give a link. The 243m is confirmed by the architect at the following page: .  Perhaps the 248m figure is to the top of the antenna. --Kcumming (talk) 16:14, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Gare Montparnasse

message: This page was moved without explanation or discussion on 23 November. I have moved it back per WP:BRD, as the original title remains the common name in English. If there is a good reason to have this at the proposed title it should be discussed via the Requested Move process. Moonraker12 (talk) 21:43, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move reverted 

message: The "train services departing"  needs an  context. Toddst1 (talk) 03:24, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The "Train services" section
Talk:Aerobic

message: Perhaps the Aerobic and Anaerobic group of topics should be rationalised by merging existing topics into
(An)aerobic
(An)aerobic exercise
(An)aerobic metabolism
(An)aerobic organism
and getting rid of
(An)aerobic glycolysis
(An)aerobic respiration
hydrolic of bein foolishness foo!
121  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.230.48.34 (talk) 16:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Category talk:Computer storage media

message: Please see the talk page of "Category:Computer storage", regarding merging of the present cat and its sibling "Category:Computer storage devices" into one cat :Category:Computer storage technology. --Wernher 06:46, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the  template because WP:CFD should be used for categories. Mark Hurd (talk) 13:31, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging of categories
Category talk:Computer storage devices

message: Please see the talk page of "Category:Computer storage", regarding merging of the present cat and its sibling "Category:Computer storage media" into one cat :Category:Computer storage technology. --Wernher 06:46, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the  template because WP:CFD should be used for categories. Mark Hurd (talk) 13:31, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merging of categories
Talk:Hœnir

message: There appear to be at least four spellings of this god's name: Honir, Hönir, Hœnir, and Höner. We ought to pick one and be consistent with it. I'd make the change, but I don't know which is the most accurate (or most representative of the pronunciation, etc.) Jonathan Grynspan 07:18, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Hœnir is the standardized spelling. Let's go that. - Haukur Þorgeirsson 22:50, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Four spellings
Talk:Interstitial fluid

message: :Interstitial fluid is one of the two components of extracellular fluid besides plasma.
What is the other of the two components besides plasma (three components total, counting plasma)? Or is plasma the other component, for a total of two components? The interpretation of the statement is ambiguous. In the former case, the third component should be mentioned in passing. In the latter, the sentence should be rephrased (e.g., "one of the two components of extracellular fluid, the other being plasma") to eliminate the ambiguity. I'd make the change, but I don't know which connotation is correct. — Jeff Q 02:38, 10 Feb 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Since nobody responded to my query, I removed the ambiguity using the second inference, which appears to be backed up by the extracellular fluid article. — Jeff Q (talk) 10:56, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other component? 

message: Since Intercellular Fluid, Tissue Fluid, and Interstitial Fluid all refer to the same thing, these all should be the same article.  Intercellular Fluid redirects to Tissue Fluid already, so all that needs to be done is to merge Interstitial Fluid into Tissue Fluid and create a redirect. Albert109 05:41, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Interstitium redirects here, but the article fails to explain this concept which it should. Actually, shouldn't the entire article be moved to interstitium? as that concept is slightly wider and we don't need separate articles. // habj (talk) 23:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Interstitium 

message: :Because the blood in the capillaries is constantly flowing, equilibrium is always reached.
I could be missing something here, but doesn't the fact that the blood in the capillaries keeps flowing mean that equilibrium is *never* reached? And doesn't that make more sense anyway, since at equilibrium no more exchange of water or solutes would occur?
Or have I missed something?
James barton (talk) 22:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Osmotic Equilibrium 

message: The biological definition given here is too specific- by definition, the fluid in the interstices in any material is interstitial fluid. It is true that the vast majority of google hits refer to the biological fluid, but the term is also used in geology and ecology to refer to the water between grains of sand in soil or in the substrate below a lake or river (google "soil interstitial fluid") 
Seasonal Variation in Interstitial Fluid Quality of the Andoni Flats, Niger Delta, Nigeria 
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY OF CONDUIT STREAM SEDIMENT INTERSTITIAL FLUIDS OF THE SOUTH CENTRAL KENTUCKY KARST AQUIFER 
Perhaps all this material should be moved to extracellular fluid and this should be a very short page stating that interstitial fluid usually refers to one kind of extracellular fluid in cellular organisms, but can also refer to fluid in soil or porous minerals or any material that has interstices? Eaberry (talk) 22:11, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More General Definition