Talk:Lumix

message: This entry does not even state when the Lumix brand was created.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.99.193.239 (talk) 12:27, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  when? 

message: Where? --Norz (talk) 14:24, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article may contain original research or unverified claims 

message: If anybody has any information about the new TZ1, I would appreciate the feedback. Thanks!— Preceding unsigned comment added by  (talk • contribs) 
---
http://www.dpreview.com is a pretty good site for information.  Essentially a 5-megapixel semi-compact with 10x (35-350mm) zoom.  Some more specific information:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0602/06021405panasonictz1.asp
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/specs/Panasonic/panasonic_dmctz1.asp
-Tejastheory 04:20, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  TZ1 

message: The "noise" "con" was worded a little too harshly, imo -- as if written by someone trying to put down these cameras.  I've modified it so it reads more neutral -- yes, Virginia, there is noise, no, Virginia, it isn't half as bad as some people make it out to be -- as long as you're not a pixel-peeper.  The bulk of the people who retch about lumix noise are 100%-viewing pixel-peepers... the real world doesn't view pictures at 100%.
Tigerplish 18:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Massaged the 'noise' thing. 

message: The Venus Engine V processor appears technically to be similar to the dual-chip Venus Engine HD processor, but is being branded differently. Shall we treat is separately. I'm editing with this assumption.
CameraTechie (talk) 18:45, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Venus V versus Venus HD 

message: What does the "DMC" stand for? JIP | Talk 19:48, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: (It's quite possible that the MC part refers to the Multi-coating used on all lenses). 79.69.10.75 (talk) 14:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

text: Excellent question. "Digital Mirrorless Camera"? Note that some models use the prefix DMC and others DC. Maikel (talk) 23:31, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "DMC"? 

message: See Panasonic launches new FP series and the latest model of FX series  - Jwarnier (talk) 11:05, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  FX60 and FP8 are missing 

message: On the European market the TZ18 and TZ22 are currently the newest TZ models. The difference between these seems to be that the TZ22 has a GPS receiver, so it can store the location of a photo on the EXIF data. Appears to be very similar to the ZS8/ZS10 on the American market. But I don't know what the difference between the TZ20 and TZ18/22 is. --84.119.44.177 (talk) 14:40, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  TZ18 and TZ22 are missing too 

message: Cut & Paste from the page.  Please clean up and reference if you care about the similarities / differences between these two brands.  Hell..... I not even sure if this constitutes as libel.
Some Panasonic and Leica cameras are the same. The differences, other than the obvious exterior styling, are in the camera firmware. Different application software is also supplied by the two companies with the cameras. Claims regarding differing quality control or weatherproofing are unsubstantiated.
The Leica and Panasonic cameras produce the same RAW image, but will process white balance, noise reduction, etc. differently for JPEG output. Lumix cameras are two or three times less expensive than their Leica counterparts due to the huge difference in brand prestige.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vapes (talk • contribs) 20:10, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Leica model crossover 

message: The following models - all issued during the past year - are missing (name variants are due to different US naming conventions):
- LX10/LX15
- FZ2000/FZ2500
- GH5
- TZ100
79.69.10.75 (talk) 14:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing models 

message: This camera is listed among the L series of high-end compacts, which is quite fair (it is continuing that trend). However, as it contains a Micro Four Thirds sensor, should it not also be listed in that category too?
79.69.10.75 (talk) 14:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it would qualify as a M4/3 camera, since as far as I understand it Micro Four Thirds is a standard based around various factors such as a specified sensor size, but also lens mount and flange back distance. It also doesn't seem to carry the M4/3 logo that most M4/3 cameras have somewhere on their body, but I realise that's only a minor thing.. Robrob42 (talk) 18:15, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category query (LX100) 

message: Just a note that there is actually very history of the Lumix brand.  Simply when panasonic started it, and then listing updates to cameras.
It's almost not worth having, as you learn nothing about how a camera line magically started up in 2001, no information about leadership, what Pansonic's goals were, etc etc  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.45.74.141 (talk) 20:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  There's really almost no information about Lumix in this article