lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Shincha

message: 
Daf (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Was dealt with at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2022 October 28 * Pppery * it has begun... 19:00, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright query

message: I'm not familiar with shincha, but I am under the impression that it is considered a green tea.  The article mentions that it is pan fried.  I thought pan frying was only done for oolong and black teas, though I have no sources to back this up. The article could use a reference citation for that information. -Verdatum (talk) 16:12, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Nevermind. Apparently it's common.  I wish the green tea article had a decent section on harvesting/preparation, but that's a separate issue. -Verdatum (talk) 17:13, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pan frying?
Talk:Aelius Gallus

message: A sentence in the "Life" section doesn't make sense and appears to be missing something:
"He replaced Cornelius Gallus—with whom he has often been confounded—had been invested with the same office."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Audaciter (talk • contribs) 01:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sentence in "Life" section
Talk:Quintus Gargilius Martialis

message: Fraudulent?
I don't think that the book has been closed on the SHA. Calling it wholly fraudulent is a little biased and extreme. Also "likely" is a little too strong a word to use here.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.132.171.131 (talk) 22:50, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aulus Gellius

message: I removed the link to Latin Library because it was to a partial text of the Attic Nights, rather than a complete one. (It was also mislabelled "Selected works", which it isn't: the Nights are in fact the complete works of Gellius as we have them, and LatLib's pages were not selected among other works by Gellius, but incomplete within the Nights themselves.) Bill 12:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: External links

message: Leofranc Holford Strevens is quoted on this page but somehow his definitive study of Aulus Gellius and the Attic Nights is not listed among the editions. Oxford University Press claims that it's "The only comprehensive study of Aulus Gellius in any language."
"Aulus Gellius: An Antonine Scholar and His Achievement"
Oxford University Press, 2004  460 Pages
ISBN: 9780199263196 Msalt (talk) 16:28, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing reference to a key book
Talk:National Provider Identifier

message: Does anyone know how the NPI checksum works?
Try this website. It's a free NPI check digit(checksum) tool for the health care industry
*Note: The above page only checks 9-digit numbers. The NPI is 10 digits long.
*update Feb 9, 2008 - The NPI number uses the Luhn forumla to calculate. You put in 9 numbers, it runs through an algorithm (google it), and generates the 10th digit, which is a check digit used for validation.
: This needs a citation .... Anyone? --Mistsrider (talk) 19:58, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: These people are a joke 2601:701:8201:41B0:728A:A7DD:212E:60F7 (talk) 18:03, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Don't waste your money
Talk:Circus Maximus: Chariot Wars

message: I would like to see some sources for that last edit, because I have only heard negative things about the game.--SkiDragon (talk) 01:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wow, the fake X-Box live cult following thing, and elephants fighting dragons? I love how this has not been edited, yet if somebody puts 'dildo' in the Tyrannosaurus Rex article that gets reverted in an instant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.134.81.21 (talk) 04:47, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wow
Talk:Second Avenue Deli

message: Removing the noref tag since, well, a reference is given that covers some (but not all) of the information here. Perhaps the giver of this tag would like to be more specific. --Mashford 14:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Let us be slightly clear 

message: Something needs to be written about the cultural importance of this place!   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.86.244.123 (talk) 22:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:B.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology

message: Is there a rule in Wikipedia that university rankings made by private organisations cannot be used? I hardly doubt it. User:Muhandes please discuss your point here. I am replacing the content for time being. 137.97.92.200 (talk) 17:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there is no such "rule" and in fact most rankings are by private organizations such as newspaper and it is perfectly fine to use rankings which the community accepts as notable and reliable. I object to the rankings you added because of boosterism. By quoting rankings which are not used in any other article on an India university you are giving them undue weight and are presenting a non-neutral view. If you wish to discuss including these rankings in articles about universities in India, please discuss it in WT:INEI. --Muhandes (talk) 19:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rankings
Talk:29th United States Congress

message: *This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
*suggestions for future improvements:
#supplemental Senate & House committees article
#supplemental district maps article
#narrative for major legislation
#narrative for major events
stilltim 04:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Since he was never seated in Congress, I think Washington Poe (GA-3) should be omitted from this list.--Appraiser (talk) 13:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Washington Poe
Talk:27th United States Congress

message: *This article is COMPLETE and meets the current standard for this series of articles.
*suggestions for future improvements:
#supplemental Senate & House committees article
#supplemental district maps article
#narrative for major legislation
#narrative for major events
stilltim 00:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Young-Oak Kim

message: This phrase "The battalion was previously known to be incompetent" makes no sense, as the preceding discussion is about the 31st Infantry (which means regiment). I cannot tell if someone forgot to mention a battalion, or if someone wrote battalion when they meant regiment -- but at it stands now, it looks pretty clearly nonsensical. Harvard yarrd  —The preceding  signed but undated. 
:Yes.  References (beyond the paltry few I just added) might help an ambitious editor tease out meaning.  --AndersW (talk) 01:39, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Battalion"/"regiment" mistake? 

message: This article contains a reference that starts "Possibly Young Kim, born in Los Angeles on February 24, 1920."  The word "possibly" is a red flag; the citation should be verified before it's added.  Further, it seems to me that this cannot logically be the right birthdate.  Reliable sources say the man died on December 29, 2005 at age 86.  If so, he could not have been born February 24, 1920; if he had been born then, he would have been age 85 at his death.  One source or the other must be wrong, and the "possibly" leads me to presume that the birth date citation is most likely in error.  What was the reasoning behind this reference? // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 13:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth date reference
Talk:Real-time card game

message: Now, the article claims that the concept of a real-time card game was invented by James Ernest with some relatively modern commercial game. Which year was that game released? I remember playing real-time card games in the middle 80's (spit, to be exact), and I am quite sure that I can dig up a 1960's reference to the following real time card game: Each player plays solitaire as fast as they can, and they are allowed to build on the opponent's table in some situations.Punainen Nörtti 14:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ?
Talk:Bruce Gary

message: Rest in Peace. Taken too early.
(posted 14:27, 24 August 2006 by 209.161.237.165)
Way too early... Davidpatrick 17:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:(84522) 2002 TC302

message: This article, and several external references circa 2003, say TC302 is about 1000km in diameter. However, Michael E. Brown's web site lists it as only 710km. http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/whatsaplanet/howmanplanets.html
The IAU lists its magnitude as 3.9, which implies a diameter between 400 and 1000km. http://ifa.hawaii.edu/faculty/jewitt/kb.html Frankie
Looking at this plot, most TNOs under 1000km appear to have albedos lower than 0.25. Kheider 03:38, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Stanberry at al (Spitzer) show estimated 1145 km (−325 +337)! Eurocommuter 12:43, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Size Estimate?

message: We do not have as today resonant TNO article (only the re-direct from the twotinos), so the link to the mean motion resonance is temporary. Resonant objects are classified separately in following the new definitions of TNO (elltio 2006) i.e. they are not KBO and they are not SDO (see scattered disk). Eurocommuter 22:45, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, stubbed resonant Trans-Neptunian Object in spite of the late hour. Eurocommuter 23:49, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resonant object 

message: Do we really want to start using high resolution false images generically generated by Celestia that suggest we known far more about any object than we do? Even Pluto is rendered (known) at a lower resolution. And if we are going to use false advertising we should at least limit them to 180px.  For now I have removed the image as too misleading since it doesn't even demonstrate a size comparison between 2 objects. -- Kheider (talk) 18:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm late responding to this, but it's still going on. I agree with Kheider. I prefer a real photographic dot to artistic works, except maybe in a few cases where the art displays an uncommon characteristic, such as Haumea's shape or the relative sizes of Orcus/Vanth. Even then I would prefer a diagram, so the reader doesn't have to do a double-take to see that it's not real. Tbayboy (talk) 15:20, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Part of the problem is that Celestia generically makes almost all the dwarf planet candidates look like :File:YE7_Celestia_Bright.jpg and :File:TC302_Celestia.jpg.  The images at celestiamotherlode are pretty, but could be misleading if not used for a good reason.  As an example, 2009 YE7 probably is not spherical. -- Kheider (talk) 15:37, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Generic computer generated images

message: Need to wait for it to get through peer review mind and it has really rather a lot of authors:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.08881
©Geni (talk) 07:10, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: New paper covering stellar occultation
Talk:Julia Maesa

message: Julia Domna's article states she was born five years before Maesa, so how can she be Maesa's younger sister? Clarityfiend (talk) 22:50, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: She in fact isn't. Julia Domna was born in 160 while Maesa was born in 165, I corrected it now after I rewrote the article from scratch.Jadd Haidar (talk) 22:06, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Younger sister?
Talk:Julia Soaemias

message: The Wikipedia page for the Roman general (and purported EUNUCH?) Gallus said that he was loyal to her because he was "basically her husband."  Does anyone have a source/more info for this, and should it be added to her page?  It sounds pretty important if it proves to be true.  Thanks! Tabbycatlove (talk) 01:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallus?
Template talk:Infobox battery

message: Would it make sense to add a single cell nominal voltage entry to this?
For example:
chemistry            	nominal voltage (at 20°C)
Alcaline             	1.5v
NiMH                 	1.2v
NiCD                 	1.2v
Lead acid (flooded)  	2.1v
Lead acid (AGM, VRLA)	2.105 V
Lithium              	3.6v
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ssd (talk • contribs) 05:41, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I like it. Included in rechargeable battery --Nopetro 12:11, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Nominal voltage

message: I'd say that the name preceding the value should be Consumer-price/energy or possibly  Consumer-price/energy-unit  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.255.33.94 (talk) 07:27, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Energy/consumer-price  => Consumer-price/energy 

message: There is some confusion  as to whether is coulombic efficiency or energy efficiency. Constant314 (talk) 23:21, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charge/discharge efficiency
Talk:Lactantius

message: Part of this article shamelessly quotes the Catholic Encyclopedia.  Recommend rewriting it.
(not a user: March 2008)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.62.170.69 (talk) 14:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If it's the PD version, then that's fine, although re-writing would be good. Rich Farmbrough, 11:11, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  PLAGIARISM 

message: If he died 320, Constantinople did not yet exist. The Constantinople project was started in 324 and the city was inaugurated in 330. -- 77.7.132.246 17:01, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "ending in Constantinople" 

message: Whilst interesting, that the only significant secondary sources are dated to 1950 and 1913 is disappointing. Constantine's 1700 anniversary is attracting a fair amount of academic attention to this period, and L is accepted as a worthwhile chronicler - especially given the relative paucity of primary sources. It would be great to see a complete rewrite - it would make a great undergraduate project for someone!! Ender's Shadow Snr (talk) 23:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desperately needs more up to date references 

message: This quotation strikes me as polemical: "The strengths and the weakness of Lactantius are nowhere better shown than in his work. The beauty of the style, the choice and aptness of the terminology, cannot hide the author's lack of grasp on Christian principles and his almost utter ignorance of Scripture."  How could a renowned Christian apologist be utterly ignorant of scripture?  He might not be an Augustine, but still, this seems a bit much to cite as though it were a neutral, scholarly assessment.  --  Chris  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.34.53.99 (talk) 21:32, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tendentious Quotation 

message: The caption reads: "Mural possibly depicting Lactantius" that means "Mural possibly NOT depicting Lactantius" is equally true. Not a NPOV> Also, what does this image actually add to this article? 
Hskoppek (talk) 18:52, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is the point of a questionable image 

message: It's good to see that the long Copernicus digression is gone, but it's a shame to see that Lactantius is still being scape goated for flat-eartherism, this time by citing Blavatsky (!?) of all people. Blavatsky is not a reliable source since she had no expertise at all in patristics or Lactantius. 
The article as it reads now says that Lactantius taught Crispus that belief in a round earth was "heretical". The source cited is a polemic comparing Oxford dons who dismiss Theosophy with Lactantius, alleging he dismissed a round earth, but references nothing by Lactantius himself. I will delete this assertion and its disreputable source unless I hear any objections. Rwflammang (talk) 03:31, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blavatsky
Talk:Gaius Lucilius

message: Can someone please translate the latin "Percrepa pugnam Popilli, facta Corneli cane" and "quo fit ut omnis Votiva pateat veluti descripta tabella Vita senis,". 
For those of us who cannot read latin, it is almost impossible to understand the paragraphs on which these quotes lie. thanks. 69.80.163.152 22:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translating Latin 

message: This needs to be divided into sections. It is difficult to read without such divisions.RomanHistorian (talk) 20:27, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Difficult to read

message: Conflicting dates are given... Was he born in the 160's or "about 180"...? SkaraB (talk) 14:15, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth year "c.160s" or 180
Category talk:Latin medical words and phrases

message: Most phrases listed under these categories are common for both medicine and biology because they are used in the biomedical research (in vivo, in vitro, in situ, ad libitum). It is suggested that a unified category Latin phrases used in biology and medicine should be established to cover both fields. Few specific phrases (cura te ipsum or incertae sedis) can be easily placed among others in this new category. Alexei Kouprianov 14:35, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Keeping the page as is might encourage the lengthening of this list both through link economy, web search engine caching, and the realization of scarcity of data in this case.  The unified category you mentioned can redirect to existing categories. Yosofun 04:07, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I probably agree with you but then, shouldn't the phrases like in vitro be placed under both categories (biology and medicine)? Alexei Kouprianov 08:34, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Keep as is 

message: this would be really useful as a template that could go at the bottom of articles so people could see the other latin medical phrases and jump to them directly instead of having to go to the category page first.  I think the category page should remain however.  Tkjazzer 13:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please make this in to a template
Category talk:Latin biological phrases

message: dear somebody.
it would be Most Helpful to have a.) an A-B list of all terms/words/phrases as well as categories.
b.)  Even MORE helpful to have a regular ETYMOLOGY link.  ex.  the particle "duc" which would include: induct,reduction, conduct-or/ion   etc.... and how the word come about etc.... Polymerleah 13:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Macrobius

message: Really, guys. He was "highly gay"? The rest of the biography is about as bad and neglects Stahl's lucid discussion. There is no proof he was "African" -- just probably "not Roman". Spain remains an option. Stahl disputes his religious identification. Likewise "has been described as" is weak -- the citation goes to Cameron's article but this just passes on a reference. I'm not sure I'm the best bet to fix all that but I will dispute the "B" rating it gets. I'm not sure there's enough information to merit more than that, but this summary is abyssmal. I'm also not certain that the bulk of the entry should be summaries of his works (which may merit their own entries). Micahross (talk) 06:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Some old page history that used to be at the title "Macrobius" is now at Talk:Macrobius/Old history. Graham87 13:20, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old page history 

message: There have been some recent edits disputing whether Macrobius should be called a Roman (and calling for citations on this point).  The Life section provides adequate sources concerning his disputed origin: either in the Greek speaking provinces, North Africa, or Spain, and there seems agreement that he was "born under foreign skies."  In the light of this I will make the passage read that he was a "Roman provincial" and not provide sources (which are not required in the lead when there are adequate citations in the body of the article). --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 23:51, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Roman" in lead 

message: There are a few different connections here
Symmachus ( the famous pagan) , Theodosius, Flavianus, Macrobius, Boethius, symmachus ( boethius' father) 
This is the pagan literary circle amongst the roman elite of the period that dedicated themsleves to translating and transmitting the traditional literature of rome and greece. Its a hugely important element in understanding the culture of the late roman era. I could either add comments on all the relevant articles ( eg here I would point out macrobius dedicated his De differentiis to symmachus) 
indeed "Symmachus, and his real-life associates Vettius Agorius Praetextatus and Virius Nicomachus Flavianus, are the main characters of the Saturnalia of Macrobius Ambrosius"
The symmachus who adopted boethius was named after this symmachus and strongly informs us of the culture of the family  
CantingCrew (talk) 08:00, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Pagan Literary circle
Talk:Gaius Maenius

message: Are we sure that Gaius led a naval action? Livy makes no reference of a naval action, and Smith only mentions the rostrae being taken. This does not imply that Meanius took them by naval combat; they could have been taken while docked. Romanvs91 (talk) 01:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Ulpius Marcellus

message: the account from Britannia appears to make sense, but Anthony Birley argues that there were two Ulpii Marcelli: one who was governor circa 184 (based on Dio 72.8.2-6 & some of the recorded inscriptions), & another who was governor circa 212. (Birley, The Fasti of Roman Britain (Oxford, 1981), pp. 140-142, 164-166.) Both reconstructions -- Birley & Brassington -- have their strengths & weaknesses. And while it may require a new generation of Classical scholars to determine which of the two theories is the more likely, the fact remains there are two theories one could use to interpret the facts. -- llywrch (talk) 04:37, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Perhaps not the whole story
Talk:Marcia (mistress of Commodus)

message: Wow. You obviously know what you are doing with wikipedia. You have a great deal of information and it is all organized very well. I can honestly not think of anything content-wise that needs changing because you seem to have spent a good while researching your topic. If I could say that anything needed to be added, it would be nice if there was a kind of picture, however, I guess it would be kind of hard to find a picture of this specific woman. If you haven't tried though, you should because that would just be the icing on this wonderful wikipedia cake. Even without a picture I think this is great work. Good job! (I'll read it again to see if I missed anything... if you do not see anymore entries from me, that means I fully endorse what I have already wrote!)
-Lauren-A.B.
This looks really good, I hardly have anything to say about it.  You have really good details, but still manage to tell the stories well without sounding biased.  I agree with Lauren, adding a picture, of Marcia or even Commodus if you can find one, would be about the only addition I can think of.  You might also want to look at the notes for the references, a couple of sources are listed twice as separate sources instead of just having the number referenced again.  But again, that's really nitpicking, the content doesn't really seem to need any work.  -Samantha
I completely agree with the comments above.  The article is very well done.  The only thing that caught my attention was how there was only a single sentence under the "Life after Commodus" tab.  My suggestion would be to try and include this under another category.  Other than this I see nothing wrong with the article.  The word usage, grammar, and content are very well done and I also really like how u were able to include a "Notes" and "Resources" tab.  You truly are a model wikipedian!!! ~James
This is an excellent wikipedia article; since I am currently writing a scholarly article on Marcia myself, I am particularly impressed with your range of sources and material. Including more information about Marcia's treatment of Christians, and perhaps a mention of the dubious source material of the Historia Augusta, might have improved your piece, but you did a very good job in general. Perhaps a little too much material was taken directly from Salisbury's book.
Anisekstrong 03:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled