Talk:Typhoon Chanchu

message: Here's some links that might be useful. Hurricanehink (talk) 18:26, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links 

message: What do we use in the article?
*Unofficial source says Macanese; possibility of Cantonese
#NSLE (T+C) at 17:30 UTC (2006-06-01)
#íslenska hurikein #12(talk) 19:39, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I wouldn't go that far. There were only four people voting in the straw poll, most of whom voted more than once. I'll agree with Nilfanion on this one and say that who contributed the name and what it means is not that important to the article if it is disputed. --Hurricanehink (talk) 17:40, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Straw poll

message: Does anybody think they can find an image of Chanchu making landfall in China? I've tried the NASA site, and the navy site is all weird. So where else could there be one? Icelandic Hurricane #12 11:07, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: nevermind, I got one, unless if someone can find a better one. Icelandic Hurricane #12 22:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: I dont get it. Cyclone Mala is a B-class and this is just as good as it, maybe better. Why isnt it a B-Class? Icelandic Hurricane #12 21:13, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Because Chanchu effected more places. Mala only affected Myanmar, so we covered that impact easily. This is a bit harder, and newer. It's close, but generally B-class isn't awarded when the storm is still active or recently active. The information changes too quickly. I am referring to the Vietnam, China, and Japan impact section. Hurricanehink (talk) 21:16, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Besides the Japanese Impact section, this definetly has to be B-class material. Icelandic Hurricane #12(talk) 21:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Class

message: Future todo includes more info, including up-to-date info. The impact section is lacking in areas. Hurricanehink (talk) 02:47, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure if someone could translate the Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese?) article for Chanchu, we could find a little more impact info. I guess I could ask someone on the engish wikipedia to translate it for us. íslenska hurikein #12(samtal) 00:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There weren't much new info from the Vietnamese article.  It appears to be a translation from the English version, with one additional paragraph in the Vietnamese section: As of May 28, 2006, tens of Vietnamese fishing ships were affected by Chanchu.  14 were sunk and 4 others are missing with a total of 322 fishermen.  Almost 250 people have been reported missing.  Some believe that this disaster was caused by incompetent weather forecasting by Vietnamese governmental agencies.  These forecasts differ from forecasts of the region by forecasts from the Philippines, Hong Kong, Japan, Hawaii, the United States Navy, etc.  However, these allegations were denied by the head of the Center for Metrological Forecasting. DHN 01:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo2

message: First concern is the copyright status of this Image the description stats AUthor is my friend but doesn't want his name put here. Maybe true but cant use an image without definate history and details to support claim. 
Second concern is that the Vietnam section has been translated but needs a copy edit especially with present and past tense ie Almost 250 people have been reported  if its too soon to fix these types of comments then there is still more information to be added to the article and it cant be considered comprehensive enough for GA see WP:WIAGA section 3.... Gnangarra 15:51, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: GA review

message: Failed for two major reasons
# this Image current discussions in commons appear to suggest that a copyright problem exists 
# Requested copy edit, and update of information has yet to occur.
Minor Reason (alone this wouldn't have been sufficient to fail GA), that given the current status of the event there is still information that need to be finalised. Gnangarra 01:12, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Failed GA

message: Look at this. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 14:41, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Check this out!

message: Here's a lot of Aftermath. íslenska hurikein #12 (samtal) 14:49, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Todo3

message: The previous image is much closer to it's landfall. I finally added a new one much nearer to it's peak after i got a new internet connection... --IrfanFaiz 08:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What's the difference? So what if the old one was closer to landfall? If both images were of it at its peak then your change was redundant. – Chacor 09:14, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The storm has a higher wind speed in the new image... --IrfanFaiz 05:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  New peak image 

message: Anyone care to review this for A-class? I'm planning on taking this to FAC in the future. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk)  16:43, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Not seeing any obvious issues, so I'm inclined to up it. YE Pacific Hurricane 07:03, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A-class?