Talk:Graniteville train crash

message: While it may be notable to state that the mill was able to restore its business data quickly, the following text sounds more like an advertisement:
:Avondale Mills Data Recovered by ActionFront.    
:The train wreck and chlorine spill could have threatened firms’ business continuity. Some negative economic effects of the wreck were ameliorated thanks to the quick thinking of Avondale employees and a very specialized service provider. See references section for more information.
:...
:* ActionFront Data Recovery Labs (February 24 2005), Avondale Mills Data Recovered.  Retrieved September 26 2005.
While data recovery is important, this text needs better wording and possibly a reduction to a single sentence that can be merged into the text elsewhere in the article.
slambo 17:13, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Avondale Mills business data recovery 

message: This article may have enough references to qualify as "well-referenced", but the GA criteria has recently been changed, and somebody may have to convert them to inline for this article to still count as a GA. Just a heads up. Homestarmy 14:14, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Preferably sooner than later.... Homestarmy 03:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done Slambo (Speak) 10:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh.....well....I guess it's fine then, thanks :) Homestarmy 13:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Inline Citations

message: See WP:GA/R.
--Ling.Nut 01:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:GA/R]] Article's [[WP:GA|Good Article]] status under review for delisting 

message: This article has been delisted due to GA criterion 1. b. which clearly states an article should; 
 
"contain a succinct lead section summarising the topic". LuciferMorgan 21:43, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Delisted

message: I suggest changing the name of one section from "List of fatalities," which is rather bureaucratic, to "The dead," which is shorter and more vivid. Someone's changed it back, saying the original was "more neutral point of view." I disagree. Thoughts? PRRfan (talk) 18:57, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Seeing no argument, I've removed "fatalities." PRRfan (talk) 14:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: "Victims" is, I think, a better choice of words than "The dead" for the section title. Slambo (Speak) 14:40, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: "The dead" vs. "List of fatalities"

message: The April death was attributed to the incident by media sources only.  From the NTSB debrief of the incident:
"The death of another Graniteville resident on April 19, 2005, was initially reported by media sources 
to have occurred as a result of exposure to the chlorine gas released in the accident. The final autopsy report 
for this individual listed the death as natural due to pulmonary thromboemboli. Regardless of the 
circumstances, this death would not have met the criteria for death reporting under 49 Code of Federal 
Regulations 830.2, because it did not occur within 30 days of the accident."
This should be fixed in the article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.111.69.215 (talk) 01:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edited

message: Maybe something should be added about how sheriff Mike Hunt (that's honestly his real name) told the families to stay home until 3 o'clock in the afternoon Iamanadam (talk) 13:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: If you've got a reliable source which you can cite with the information, please do. Slambo (Speak) 14:11, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Edited

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Graniteville, South Carolina, train crash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131020235636/http://www.accessnorthga.com/detail-pf.php?n=123530 to http://www.accessnorthga.com/detail-pf.php?n=123530
*Added  tag to http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/news/Stock%20News/1323195/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120222071002/http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/safety/Accident_Investigation/2005/hq200502.pdf to http://www.fra.dot.gov/downloads/safety/Accident_Investigation/2005/hq200502.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:43, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Graniteville, South Carolina, train crash. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721035857/http://www.fra.dot.gov/Pages/press-releasesold/51.shtml to http://www.fra.dot.gov/Pages/press-releasesold/51.shtml
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140719212353/http://www.wjbf.com/story/21686984/federal-prosecutors-say-norfolk-southern-should-be-fined-for-graniteville-pollution to http://www.wjbf.com/story/21686984/federal-prosecutors-say-norfolk-southern-should-be-fined-for-graniteville-pollution
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hey guys, I haven't contributed before, and I don't currently have the time to look up how to do this properly, but I think I found a source for the number of people evacuated.
https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/docs/DISASTER_RECOVERY_TrainWreckChlorineSpillGranitevilleSC.pdf
50.47.34.15 (talk) 17:16, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source Found?