Talk:Ferdinand von Prondzynski

message: The article in its current form gives far too much space to certain controversies, which in the overall context of the subject's career were not as central as the space given to them suggests. All universities have regular disputes and arguments, these were not that special. They deserve some mention, but not to this excessive extent.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.191.149.15 (talk) 20:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for adjustment to have some proportionality.

message: * Hobbies and interests, at least serious ones like his (published) photography?
* Most importantly, he is a senior academic, not some admin, where is the detail of papers, conferences and general publications, such as one of the main books on Irish employment law, I think..?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.74.6.159 (talk) 21:46, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  To do's 

message: As the popularity of Wiki has grown, several issues have become more prominent: Many people now create articles about themselves that are overly promotional in tone and are deliberately inaccurate. These are not neutral, and have no place in Wiki projects.  This Wiki page is a case in point.  Generally, the Wiki community protects these projects against this common problem by deleting or improving such hagiographies. Many editors have attempted to perform these duties for this page on Prondzynski by editing the project to reflect the facts accurately in a balanced manner with appropriate, verifiable, independent and reliable sources included (others have used it inappropriately without verifiable sources of any kind).  
The persistent reversal of edits of the ‘controversy’ section claiming apparent vandalism inaccurate, deliberate and malicious edits is unwarranted when the edits are appropriately sourced, verifiable and correctly cited in text.  It is particularly uncalled for coming from person(s) who created the page initially under ‘Groschowitz’ about himself (or relative) and then continues to edit and reverse other edits that he deems critical in nature using IP’s from Robert Gordon University (RGU), his current employer.
May I suggest that the person editing from RGU refrain from editing his Wiki page and let the Wiki community protect this project against this common problem of self aggrandisement  and thereby ensure a neutral properly sourced account of the facts (84.203.45.211 (talk) 13:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Biographies of Living Persons- Conflict of Interest 

message: I have often seen Wikipedia give Phonetic Alphabet spellings, can this be done here? And is it von P or Von P, I've seen both?79.104.4.202 (talk) 19:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling and pronunciation 

message: I've made and will make several edits to comb through this article for issues. There are several issues with this sounding like a promotional piece and often WP:SYNTH violations by citing that the subject of this article has published an article or book therefore they are an authority. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 23:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal of unsourced and original research information