lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:History of Shropshire

message: This article needs serious work done to it. Please help if you can! David 23:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

message: "Scrobbesbyrigscīr" (literally Shrewsburyshire)is correct as the county name offered in Domesday. The sounds of the Anglo-Saxon (OE) word Scrobbesbyrigscīr is phonetically identical to the modern translation Shrewsburyshire. So, why would a county under Edward the Confessor be named after the builder of a castle near Ludlow?Moonraker55 (talk) 22:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: Wem is stated to have been "garrisoned by Richard Baxter" in 1645. Baxter was that year away at Coventry as a military chaplain and roundhead preacher. I would understand "garrisoned" means commanding/organising the defences and manpower but would he/did he do that? For that reason I have deleted the reference - it can be reinstated if someone can find a citeable account that demonstrates such involvement with Wem.Cloptonson (talk) 22:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The wikipedia article on Wem states the fortifications at Wem were laid down by Sir William Brereton, one of the regional parliamentary commanders, while that on Baxter does not mention him being in Wem. The article on the English Civil War in Shropshire places the garrisoning of Wem in 1643, so I have today corrected the dating accordingly.Cloptonson (talk) 16:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Richard Baxter garrisoned Wem?
Talk:Spanish Second Division season 2004/2005

message: So are the colors just for decoration, or do they indicate teams that were promoted/relegated? Thanks. — RJH 23:33, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The colours indicate teams that were promoted and relegated. --Siva1979Talk to me 16:28, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Colors
Talk:Calculus controversy: Newton v. Leibniz

message: * Strong merge. One of these could be redirect. JackyR 23:36, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger

message: the opening paragraph says unequivocally that Newton discovered calculus in this early notes years before Leibniz, however, this is not a solid historical fact in my opinion. This is based on the reports of newton's own inner circle who claimed that Newton showed the calculus to them. These very men had obviously taken Newton's side in a bitter debate that had seen Newton actively try to obfuscate the issue. Newton even anonymously wrote the concluding remarks in the report by his own Royal Society which claimed Leibniz a fraud and Newton the true discoverer. It should be added to the opening paragraph that the dates of Newton's first use of the calculus are based on the witness accounts of Newton's close confidants. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dr. Leibniz (talk • contribs) 21:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: A few major concerns with this article
Talk:Photoblog

message: Photoblogging and Photoblog should be the same article.  As the Photoblogging article is still a stub, it can be merged into the Photoblog article. Daedalus80 23:39, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I removed sharks.devgirl.ca from the external links on the Photoblog article because the link only had 6 photos on there and thought it NN. They sent me this email: From: "y control" <xxx> Date: Friday, March 10, 2006 4:12 AM To: xxx Attachments: (none) HTML | Plain Text | Header | Raw Content hey, thanks for being an ass and deleting my link off http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoblog
The link has been added back, but I don't believe it should be there untill it is a noticeable blog.
What say the others here.  Please refer to Wikipedia:Notability (websites) 
Also please don't send me obscene emails to my personal email, but rather talk to me on my user talk  page.
JohnRussell 18:52, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: sharks link

message: This article was accidentally deleted in January; I've spoken to the administrator who did it, and, as he couldn't remember or figure out why he did it either, he restored the history.  This is the last revision prior to deletion; it has a fair bit of information that could stand to be merged into the current version. —Cryptic (talk) 19:47, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the best thing to do would be to rewrite the whole article incorporating material from the old article and maybe also from the photoblogging article.  The proposed merge could be accomplished at this time.  I'm too lazy to do all this though - anybody else interested? Ralmer Rufus 00:47, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Deleted revisions

message: Now that the warring seems to be over with, who's in favor of a merge / rewrite?  Who has the motivation to accomplish this?  Ralmer Rufus 06:51, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Progress
Talk:WNAX (AM)

message: Each year that "Your Neighbor Lady"(Wynn Hubler Speece) was on the air, WNAX published a yearly "round-up" of what happened in the Yankton area...and in the 1950's, there were photos showing YNL(Wynn) at the station's mobile podium;the attached banner read "WNAX Radio:American Broadcasting Companies, Inc."...so does this mean that WNAX was ABC affiliated at firat then switched to CBS in the early '60s?...Michaela92399 02:23, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WNAX as an ABC Radio affiliate in the 1950's?...
Talk:Visoreds

message: "The vizard are also rejected by hollows, due to their former status as Soul Reapers" nothing like this is ever stated in the manga or suggested seeing as a large faction of hollows have shinigami's as their leaders I would have to call that ;ine categorily false so i'm gonna remove it  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.213.155 (talk) 10:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The fact that multiple Espada and Hollow-aligned characters attack and engage the Vizard in combat multiple times isn't enough for you? StardustDragon 04:52, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Multiple times? You mean "once" right as in after Shinji attacked GJ, GJ went on the offensive against him. Other than that we have not seen any Hollows fight with the vizard gang. Ichigo being attacked obviously doesn't count as he was being attacked before anyone even knew he had hollow powers and even if he were never a shinigami and he were 100% hollow he would have been attacked for defending Karakura town and for invading Las Noches to take back orihime. 72.74.235.93 (talk) 16:56, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait, so Shinji, the de facto leader, attacked one of the Espada? Checkmate. StardustDragon 14:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Shinji states that he only attacked Grimmjow because one of his comrades was in danger. I agree that there is no evidence of this. :) (74.237.14.196 (talk) 11:30, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Old discussion, read the new chapters. And if Ichigo is one of his comrades, that means that Shinji would logically attack ANYONE that attacked Ichigo, meaning ALL the arrancar. Suigetsu 04:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The only time I recall Shinji attacking anyone, was when Rukia almost gor killed by Grimmjow and Shinji helped her out. Am I wrong? ~ Hyakurei (talk) 14:57, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, that's what we've established. However, Shinji did this because grimmjow attacked ichigo, his "comrade." If he attacks people based on who attacks his comrades, it's safe to assume he'll be, or wouldn't have objections to, fighting a lot of arrancar. Suigetsu 18:07, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rejection
Talk:WSOU

message: It's been added and removed twice now, so I thought I would mention that I removed some people on the list of notable alumni. 
Often alumni lists on Wikipedia are for those who already have a Wiki article written about them, or are considered "notable" by Wikipedia standards (meaning independent sources have written about the person). I thought I would provide this explanation for why I removed these links (the ones I removed didn't cite a reliable source or link to a Wikipedia biography), in case anyone was curious or wants to discuss further. - Whisperjanes (talk) 02:39, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable alumni list
Talk:Repeater

message: This arti does not address network/wifi repeaters.
This arti does not address differences of wifi repeaters vs. network bridge/switch/router.
"Active_repeater" redirecting to "Optical communications repeater" must be a type of 
networking repeater.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.119.98.215 (talk) 07:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: repeater (networking) network/wifi repeaters

message: We already have a disambiguation page, but this article is a jumble. Sections of this article should be split into more articles. Anonym1ty 23:53, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Did it. Hope you like the result. --Alvestrand 11:18, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Ithink we need to change Amateur Radio Repeater to Repeater (amateur radio) or atleast Amater radio repeater to conform with wiki naming conventions. What do you think? Anonym1ty 17:50, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't care very much - Wikipedia seems to be reasonably inconsistent, and when I searched for "amateur radio repeater" (just to check that there wasn't already such an article), a number of articles seemed to have the words in that order - having the same words makes linking those articles to the term a few bytes shorter. But as I said, I don't care very much... --Alvestrand 07:10, 22 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Split

message: Active repeater can stand on its own and should not be merged into this article. Anonym1ty 23:10, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Active repeater became Optical communications repeater at some point. I have adjusted Active repeater to point here instead. This article links to Passive repeater. Active repeater needs to  be discussed. --Kvng (talk) 16:51, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: The article needs a section on Frequency Offset.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.211.235.69 (talk) 07:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Offset 

message: Found this on the Repeater page: Being black is the best and having the n word is the greatest feeling in the world and anyone who doesn't agree is a chipmunk.  It needs to be removed.
Would someone monitor this; I use Wikipedia infrequently. 66.169.65.41 (talk) 14:00, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: 66.169.65.41 Reverted.  Thank you for catching that!  By the way, if you want to remove such vandalism yourself, on the article page you can click on the "View history" tab at top, click on the edit which added the bad material, and click "Revert".  --ChetvornoTALK 14:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Laptop orchestra

message: I'm removing the notice, since the new media coverage section is pretty good. jweed 05:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: A major contributor to this article is User:Gewang, who reports on his user page, "Ge Wang is a PhD student in the Department of Computer Science at Princeton University studying computer music. Perry Cook is his advisor. Together with Perry, Ge Wang designed ChucK, a concurrent, on-the-fly audio programming language."  Msnicki (talk) 12:17, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  COI 
Talk:Floorcloth

message: This is one of the missing 1911 Britannica articles. The original article also contains some info on the different types and brands of materials, all either outdated or covered by interwiki links. The Britannica editors obviously saw it as worthy of an encyclopedic article. I personally think it's borderline, but it doesn't really take up much space, and were it to be moved, nobody looking up the term on Wikipedia would be able to find it. I say keep, cause why not?, unless you're worried about abstract concepts like 'precedence'. Eixo 23:59, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Usefulness of this article

message: I have merged text into this article from a similar WP article, entitled Floor-cloth.  Please edit mercilessly. Bry9000 (talk) 02:23, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged text

message: The lede states: "The term was previously used also for materials used in place of carpeting or to protect expensive carpets. . ." and then goes on to describe the ways that floor cloths are used today, much the same ways as they "used" to be. And not only are they do-it-yourself projects, but they can be found for sale. Reconsider your article's phrasing. Also, the term frequently appears as "floor cloth", too. I don't know what the best practice might be regarding the spelling. Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 09:16, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Doublespeak.
Talk:Broken Top

message: Ceranthor asked for commentary on the article on the talk page, so I shall give; partial review only since it's the holidays:
* The article says that the mountain is 9,177 feet high, but this source says it's 9,175 and the source in the article approximates it at 2,800 metres. I know that the height of mountains is not generally an exact thing. 
:Do you want me to add a footnote clarifying disagreement on the exact elevation? Unsure what you're suggesting.
* Might be perhaps a personal preference, but wildfires aren't exactly uncommon and giving recent ones such detailed description may be a little undue. 
:It's only three sentences; is that really too detailed?
* I think the  template could be told to not convert km3 into such exact measures of mi3.
:Will fix that.
* The Tumalo paragraph does cite a source which does not mention Vesuvius, which is still mentioned in the paragraph.
:Will fix that.
* On the positive aspects, it seems the article has sound prose (although I have never been very good at it, so take with a pinch of salt).
Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Replied to your initial comments. ceranthor 19:51, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: The ones that I said I'd fix have been addressed, I think. ceranthor 19:57, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Realized I hadn't pinged you; sorry for that. ceranthor 22:15, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Honestly, I am not certain what to do about the elevation information. When I write on Andean volcanoes I often see several different heights and no clue as to which is more reliable - thus I write it out as "X or Y high". USAmerican volcanoes are usually much better documented so there may be a source that carries more weight than others, but I wouldn't know. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:22, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I see your point. I think that Hildreth, coming from the United States Geological Survey, would be more reliable than a website, which AFAIK I avoid because it doesn't seem like a totally reliable source. That being said, I can definitely add a footnote to clarify that there is some disagreement about the elevation. ceranthor 22:30, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some comments on the article 
Talk:Complete glucose breakdown

message: There's much more to be added in this article. Also, this temporary definition is unclear. I shall work on it. --Enigma 00:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I think it would be a good idea to merge this page with Glycolysis. Because this page covers almost the same content, I think it would be a good idea to merge this page into Glycolysis. Any non-glycolysis-related data will be merged into TCA Cycle and Electron Transport Chain. Iwill not do the merge until someone comments for it.
Littleb2009 (talk) 00:44, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Sure. --littleb2009Have a chat? 02:38, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with [[Glycolysis]]
Talk:Society of the Divine Word

message: It seems to me that the Divine Word Missionaries article should be merged into this article.  Comments?  John Rigali 00:02, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Holy Name University (HNU), formerly the Divine Word College of Tagbilaran, is an institution of higher learning, run by the Society of the Divine Word or SVD, in Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines.  While it can be discussed under Society of the Divine Word or Divine Word Missionaries, education being  one of its missions as a congregation, HNU needs a separate article.  I would like to volunteer to work on it.  How to redirect?Guest818 06:48, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Holy Name University 

message: hi!may i ask what were the challenges of the SVD missionaries faced when they were establishing SVD in vigan?what website can i access such documents regarding these challenges..  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.105.97.212 (talk) 00:04, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  SVD in vigan
Talk:SWMBO

message: I hesitated to change this before discussion, but I figured I may forget so I was bold and did it now.  There was no discussion so I started one.
As it was, a redirect to the "Rumpole of the Bailey" article that it is linked to, I was puzzled, especially since that article doesn't even include the acronym SWMBO.  I will add that to that article.  I left the Wiktionary tag in even though there is no article there, in the assumption that one will be created someday. Spalding 00:07, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm afraid I have to disagree with you. There never should be an article called "SWMBO" at Wikipedia. If there were to be an article on the character, it would correctly be at Hilda Rumpole (and SWMBO could redirect there). Now that Rumpole of the Bailey does include the acronym SWMBO (which frankly I can't remember ever seeing in the books or hearing on the TV series), there's no reason for this not to redirect there. And there should definitely not be a redirect to a nonexistent Wiktionary page in the hopes that one gets written someday. I'm restoring the redirect. Angr/talk 16:45, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

text: Well, the stub is somewhat useless.  It doesn't even mention Rumpole of the Bailey, nor the novel "She" from where the phrase originates.  Either it needs to be expanded back into usefulness, or be an actual redirect.  VeryVeryTired (talk) 20:37, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Template talk:Princesses of Wales

message: Traditionally royal consorts are known by maiden name. However that is complicated where a consort is a divorceé. In those instances, eg, Wallis Simpson, it is standard to use pre-consort name rather than maiden name, because their maiden name ceased to be used many many years before their marriage to a royal, and they became known publicly by that previous marital name rather than a long forgotten maiden name. For that reason, most historians and genealogists regard it as more accurate to describe the Duchess of Cornwall as Camilla Parker Bowles rather than Camilla Shand, and the Duchess of Windsor as Wallis Simpson rather that Wallis Warfield. I've changed the template to reflect that. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 00:09, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Secrets of the Jedi

message: A book but what use do these details have here. Please give us some more information la Enlil Ninlil 00:10, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: One time someone created a bunch of articles of books but put little or copyrighted info.  I didn't mark it for deletion because I hoped someone would add something..guess I was wrong.  Jedi6 02:19, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Uh, I think I have done it... Weirdy 09:34, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Helen Forrest

message: The part that tells about Forrest having been a civil rights activist needs more elaboration, if possible. The paragraph goes from telling about two movies she was in, and then says, "She was a civil rights activist, as well." This sentence just stands alone, with no elaboration, and has nothing to do with the rest of the paragraph. If anyone can figure out how to better incorporate this, please do so.Slater79 (talk) 15:12, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Any luck?  She’s amazing. 67.204.129.134 (talk) 03:57, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Civil Rights Activist
Talk:Cannula

message: I am disturbed by the fact that I see instruction, esp. medical in this article. I don't have any working knowledge of wikipedia guidelines, but I believe this is a violation. The article also address the reader directly which I think is another violation [ potentially less dangerous however].
PidGin128 from 65.190.216.161 (talk) 09:03, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, well it looks like it has been copied or paraphrased from some sort of medical instruction book aimed at practitioners. It's not referenced either, which doesn't help. Any medical-type people out there that can assist? Freestyle-69 (talk) 06:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  IV Cannulation 

message: I'm not sure about the description of the cause of haematoma given here: the failure to puncture the vein when the cannula is inserted or removed should not lead to haematoma - the opposite would have to be true. PeterBrooks 00:25, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Haematoma caused by not puncturing the vein?  

message: In animal nutrition research I often see cannualated roosters or dogs mentioned. I have no idea what exactly this means, but I hope someone can add this subject to the article. ike9898 23:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  cannulated rooster or dog? 

message: This describes the cannula's overuse in GB hospitals. May be worth adding. Malick78 (talk) 14:45, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Overuse in UK

message: The article does not make clear how this differs from a catheter.
—DIV (137.111.13.4 (talk) 06:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catheter
Talk:UST Angelicum College

message: Hi Anyone have a picture of the School?
: This request should be forwarded to the School Administrators.Nightvisiongoggles (talk) 19:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Also, please include both Sen. Antonio Trillanes and broadcaster Bernadette Sembrano to the list of notable alumni.Nightvisiongoggles (talk) 19:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The listing of "Rafael Nelson M. Aboganda" is a hoax (see  and ) and has been removed. TJRC (talk) 23:03, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rafael Nelson M. Aboganda 
Talk:Relic Entertainment

message: "has released a number of innovative..."
Why not just say "has released..."
:#Please sign your Talk page posts with ~~~~.
:#My understanding is that Homeworld was hailed as innovative by most reviewers.  I don't see it as an inaccurate statement. — ceejayoz talk 20:11, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: adulation?

message: In "release history": Company of Heroes 2 TBA in August. Any source for that?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.227.121.52 (talk) 13:46, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Company of Heroes 2?

message: "Wood is survived by his wife, Erin, and daughter, Sierra." <-- That makes no sense to me  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.7.5.95 (talk) 16:38, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Company of Heroes Online

message: Alright, question: When did the intellectual property of Relic Entertainment ended up in Vivendi's ownership?
Fleet Command (talk) 17:31, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vague sentence about Vivendi Universal 

message: The "Soulstorm", the 3rd extension pack for Down of War is not mentioned in the article.
The reference for the same availabel in-hause: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soulstorm.
~~~~.
:It is not mentioned because Soulstorm was developed by a different company - Iron Lore Entertainment (see http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/warhammer-40000-dawn-of-war---soulstorm/details ). Relic did not develop it nor did they publish it, so there are no reasons to attribute Soulstorm to them.
:This is a similar situation to the Homeworld expansion called Homeworld: Cataclysm. Or to Blizzard's Diablo expansion called Diablo: Hellfire. - Lonesylph (talk) 14:10, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Warhammer 40,000: Dawn of War - Soulstorm 

message: there is a Wikipedia page for Homeworld 3. this page needs to be updated to reflect that.  including the part in this article that talks of "speculation" that the rights had been reacquired. 2601:402:4402:6BC0:C5DD:6F5C:2EED:5C6 (talk) 17:07, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Homeworld 3