lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Letter of credit

message: Could somebody add some information about Letter of credit to introduction of this article? In plain English? Because "irrevocable payment undertaking to a beneficiary against complying documents as stated in the credit" just doesn't seem to fit my definition of plain English. ;-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.131.175.214 (talk) 08:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is Letter of credit? 

message: Someone put a "Cleanup" tag on this article, and boy does it need it.  It's confusing, unreadable, full of semi-promotional links, and has obscure legal citations. Help! --John Nagle (talk) 19:54, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agree with "Cleanup" tag 

message: "Credit itself may be funded." I don't know a great deal about the financial world, but shouldn't that be "Credit itself may NOT be funded", as in the issuing bank doesn't have the funds to pay up? Concrete Cloverleaf (talk) 01:23, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Risk situations 

message: I undid a recent addition to the L/C definition - A Letter of Credit can be used to pay any amount of money up to the value of the credit, and at any time up to and after the expiry of the credit (depending on the payment terms mentioned in the credit). Tightening the definition in the way that the change did doesn't aid clarity, and in my opinion could add to a misunderstanding of this method of payment. It's important that those points are made in the article, but given that there is a lot of confusion over letters of credit in the business world I think it's important to make the opening definition as simple as possible. Davepoth (talk) 20:56, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Definition
Talk:Waterloo to Basingstoke railway service

message: Actually pretty sure this doesn't go via Weybridge, but someone's hyperlinked it from Weybridge railway station. Ojw 23:21, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This article is a duplicate of the South Western Main Line article. Our Phellap 22:10, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Replication
Talk:Eugene Podkletnov

message: The article clearly demonstrates this guy is a liar. There is no reason to propagate his further lies, especially they don't have independent comments. Lembit Staan (talk) 15:50, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Pussio 86.30.236.97 (talk) 13:04, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further Podkletnow's expliots
Talk:CIÉ

message: Córas Iompair Éireann ... is owned by the Irish Government
Even though CIÉ's own website says "the Irish Government is currently the sole owner of CIÉ", surely it is not the Irish Government but the Irish State which owns the corporation. (?) -- Picapica 23:35, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I have read the law on this and their is no capital of the company and thus it is hard to determine how their can be an owner as such? Usually state companies explicitly state in the relevant law who owns what but not here, checked 1950 and 1986 acts. It has a wide range of powers to purchase, borrow and dispose - and of course is subject to the law and the Oireachtas. Djegan 18:25, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Ownership

message: :Current government policy is that Córas Iompair Éireann should be wound up
By "wound up", does the article mean, "abolished"? -- Beland 00:13, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification
Talk:Abbey of Kells

message: This page was unsuccessfully nominated for deletion.  See Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Abbey of Kells for a record.  Postdlf 23:41, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: So was the Abbey founded in the 9th century CE as stated in the first paragraph of the page, or in 554 CE as stated in the second paragraph?
128.143.1.34 (talk) 03:26, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding date of Abbey of Kells? 

message: It seems this article is almost entirely about the book of Kells. I would like to know more about the Abbey itself, when it was abandoned, what purpose it served in the region, etc.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.159.3 (talk) 08:31, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Style 

message: Should this be merged with Kells Round Tower?Drow69 (talk) 14:35, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:World Boxing Organization

message: Now there is the List of WBO world champions, I suggest we can remove the "Former champions"-chapter from this article. Does anyone disagree?Jeff5102 09:36, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Former Champions 

message: I'm surprised this article makes no reference to the face that the WBA, WBC and IBF are considered to be the 3 major sanctioning bodies in boxing, and the WBO has always been referred to as a 4th belt, or stepping stone belt. The true definition of undisputed champ has always been to hold WBA/WBC and IBF belts at once. In fact i'm sure this article used to say just that. I know that wikipedia entires for 'WBA' 'WBC' 'IBF' and 'Undisputed Champion' all do.
That is a far too general statement, and at various times has been totally untrue. Currently the WBO Heavyweight, Cruiserweight and middleweight champions are considered to be the legitimate recognized champions, and there are numerous examples of times when the WBO belt has cast a shade of doubt on the legitimacy of champions who held other belts  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.147.48.225 (talk) 14:55, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The 4th sanctioning body 

message: Please keep an eye out for people trying to remove the "Criticism" section of the article. The fact that the WBO kept a boxer in its top 10 rankings -- and even moved him up in the rankings twice -- after he had died is certainly relevant to an understanding of the WBO. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: IMO criticism is always a relevant section when discussing any organisation as long as it is not given undue weight and it is sourced correctly, but I'll keep an eye out.--Vintagekits (talk) 08:28, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Criticism section
Talk:Gilbert E. Patterson

message: WHY IS THERE A "TOO LONG" TEMPLATE ON THE PAGE!?! The page is NOT too long. --65.120.67.100 (talk) 22:10, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Article's not ''that'' long" 
Talk:John Roberts

message: Like what I've done for the 3 chief justices before him, please put a list of presidents served under. 147.147.123.224 (talk) 15:50, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The U.S. Supreme Court is not "under" the president. The federal judiciary is a co-equal branch of the federal government. Chief justices do not serve "under" any president. Please note that the "President" field of the infobox is not used for speakers of the House or for presidents pro-tempore of the Senate as they too do not serve "under" any president. Drdpw (talk) 16:53, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 11 Decembr 2022 

message: Should the massive amount of money his wife has garnered that has been suggested as being a form of lobbying be included in the article?
The New Republic (https://newrepublic.com/article/167949/supreme-court-corruption-percoco) quotes Roberts as saying 
'https://www.milwaukeein'ependent.com/th'm-hartmann/imposing-judicial-co'e-ethics-scotus-protect-wealthy-rightwing-christians/ (quotes Roberts as saying SCOTUS can police itself)
The New York Times, "At the Supreme Court, Ethics Questions Over a Spouse’s Business Ties," January 31, 2023.
The New York Times, "A Charity Tied to the Supreme Court Offers Donors Access to the Justices," January 1, 2023.
Brennan Center for Justice, "Brennan Center Urges Supreme Court Justices to Adopt a Code of Ethics," September 24, 2019. 
Kdammers (talk) 19:17, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest issue 

message: Write more about his kids and family. such as his parents and wife
eeeee 47.220.199.214 (talk) 18:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: per WP:BLPPRIVACY, WP:BLPNAME EvergreenFir (talk) 18:49, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 December 2023 

message: On the 29 September 2005, John Roberts stated he would not be donning Chief Justice Renquist's robes. These robes had black stripes on either arm around the elbow.  
Robert's said at the time he didn't want to be seen as being "above" the other, more-experienced Justices and preferred to be one of several Justices.  And so it has continued.
In my opinion, he knew in his heart he could not command nor fulfill the highest position on the court.  He doubted his supervisory abilities and did not want to be seen as 'boss of the court.'  While he has been comfortable with being a tie breaker, he has never risen to the position for which he was nominated.
This is evident today with the severe ethical lapses on the court. He acts like a church mouse and is happy to not get involved.
I have recognized this flaw in him since September of 2005.
 RG  Clark, Dallas (talk) 06:30, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roberts refused the Chief Justice robes 

message: change "...ban could justified on the basis of national security..." to "...ban could be justified on the basis of national security..." Bigfatmidget (talk) 05:34, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 6 June 2024
Talk:Edith Jones

message: I don't know about copyright law, but there is a picture of Edith Jones at the following location:
http://www.law.virginia.edu/home2002/images/news/jones.jpg
on this page
http://www.law.virginia.edu/home2002/html/news/2003_spr/judge_jones.htm
----
The image at http://www.nlm.nih.gov/changingthefaceofmedicine/gallery/photo_175_3.html should be public domain. anthony 22:54, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Dammit, DiPierro, that's a doctor, not a judge... Eliot 15:22, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Oops. anthony 13:57, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: * What is the religious faith of Judge Edith Jones?
Roman Catholic. Captain Video 23:10, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religious Faith 

message: A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Edith Hollan Jones was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 01:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bot-created subpage
Talk:Mike Chioda

message: He's always been one of my favs just like earl hebner and i think he'd be a HUGE addition to the AEW roster so i hope it happens sooner rather than later  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:E000:110E:4A9D:405B:D57B:BD9E:944E (talk) 10:35, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  AEW 

message: Bro is a goat PilatesHelps (talk) 04:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I love mike chioda
Talk:Wilhelm Fliess

message: Can we please determine once and for all whether it's "Fleiss" or "Fliess"?  And post the proof here so that we don't have more changes? -- Antaeus Feldspar 00:27, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: *
*
As far as I remember somewhere here I've read that according to Robert Fliess's writings the ambulatory psychotic has been his mother Ida, states Esterson. (do I remember right?)
:Austerlitz -- 88.72.24.23 (talk) 09:52, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Austerlitz -- 88.75.81.158 (talk) 08:35, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Robert Fliess 

message: Can someone fix reference #9? I don't know how to.Maurice Magnus (talk) 12:53, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference # 9
Talk:No Place to Run (album)

message: on the confusion over release dates, it was definitely released at the beginning of the year as I remember UFO toured the UK then to promote the album. I can find no reference to the later date on the article quoted so I've changed the sentence to only include the Jan date. Andrewself (talk) 15:40, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  release date
Talk:Call stack

message: Merge to main Call stack#Local data storage . Prev proposal Talk:Call_stack/Archive_1#Merger_proposal. Some parts may be merged to Stack (abstract data type). Widefox; talk 16:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Closing, given the consensus not to merge. Klbrain (talk) 10:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Stack-based memory allocation]]
Talk:Ash (deity)

message: "Consort" is used in numerous mythological articles, not just Egyptian ones. Further, "Boyfriend" in this context is a completely incorrect term. The term and concept of boyfriend are only as old as our modern concept of courtship; dating. Ancients did not date, nor did their deities. -Tydaj 01:09, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Even if he's not Set's consort, I'm sure there's a better term than "boyfriend". Courtship has been around for ages, dating has not. -Tydaj 16:10, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: What is wrong with "boyfriend" ? It explains exactly what the situation was in the clearest manner. ~~~~ 18:46, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

text: This discussion was continued on Talk:Set (mythology); please read that page for more information. - AdelaMae (talk - contribs) 08:54, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Boyfriend"
Talk:Force It

message: Hi co-contributors,
I became aware of the 2-CD release and wanted to look it up here in Wikipedia. I found the tracks for CD 2 were deleted a while ago directly after they were added, plus also that undo was not properly executed (1 track of the 2-CD version remained listed). I Digged a bit on Musicbrainz and found that the 2-CD is an official release, read https://musicbrainz.org/release/bf0e23b4-1f27-4a48-9653-27b2919522dc for proof of this.
Jeffrodo von Rivendell am Rhein (talk) 08:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redo of earlier undo relating to the 2-CD release of 10-09-2021
Talk:Lily of the Valley

message: hello, if possible, i want to know the ethymology of the word "lily of the valley"
for add to the French wikipedia. Thx. --Somnambule 01:17, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology

message: I've just been to a screening of the 1960 film The Trials of Oscar Wilde. In the staging of all three trials, a nosegay of lily was to be seen on the judge's desk. 
Is it a British custom? If yes, what about it? What are its origin and meaning and is it still in use?
If anybody has the answers to these questions, are they worth adding to the main article? THX.
S.Camus 13:38, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: May lily on judges' desks?

message: Include the reference please.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.246.62.6 (talk) 01:12, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Breaking Bad 

message: I moved the article from Convallaria to Lily of the Valley. Convallaria is the name of the genus that Lily of the Valley is in, and there is another member of the genus whose name is not mentioned at all in the article. Therefore, it seemed inappropriate to have the article named after the genus. I went with Lily of the Valley rather than the genus and species because it is much more common on Google, and Lily of the Valley seems to be by far the most common of the common names.
If you disagree with the move, please follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves for requesting that the article be moved. You can also post a message on my talk page (this talk page is not on my watchlist, so you will need to use my talk page for me to notice). However, it might be a few days before I come back to Wikipedia again. -- Kjkolb 07:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move 

message: Is it really necessary encyclopedic information to mention that the flower is the symbol of various assorted frats and sororities? Just seems like self-promotion to me; just a list of them who want their name in there, but don't really add to the article. Doesn't even mention why they're used as the symbol, just mentions the list of em. Any other opinions? --99.38.251.60 (talk) 01:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Symbols of Fraternities and Sororities?

message: "The odor of lily of the valley, specifically the ligand bourgeonal, attracts mammal sperm in a dramatic manner."
I'm sure there is sound science behind this statement, but the literary effect is to create an image of thousands of sperms swimming through the air towards this plant.  Maybe a "science person" can do a better translation to laymen's language.Jonny Quick (talk) 06:06, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sperm Attractant"?
Talk:Allan Jenkins (journalist)

message: Good heavens, can't we do better than this?  If Mr. Jenkins deserves an article, we could at least post some of his work experience, university, etc.?  I can't find anything on the web but the garbage that other sites have lifted from us (sadly...I hope they all update soon).  If we can't get much more than this, I don't see how we really have an article at all.  Anyone have access to better info? Jwrosenzweig 07:07, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The brevity of the article
Talk:Chausie

message: I noticed a lot of this article is based on TICA cat show standards in defining the breed. I realize there are other cat organizations beside TICA. Is that typical for other purebred cat articles? Jooojay (talk) 06:54, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: TICA information

message: I added cats portal because this article relates to cats.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.19.75.28 (talk) 02:57, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  I added cats portal.
Talk:The monks

message: I was always under the impression that there was no "The" in the band's name.
:The 'official' website the-monks.com uses 'the', so I think it is correct to keep this. --David Edgar 15:18, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Since both articles now contain (approximately) the same factual content, and the merge has been left incomplete for months, I now intend to complete it, making The Monks the main article, and this one as a redirect. --David Edgar 15:18, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  "The Monks" or just "Monks" 

message: While it would appear sensible to merge the two existing "the monks" pages (content the same), there remains confusion with another band called "The Monks", which featured ex Strawbs players John Ford and Richard Hudson ("Hud").  Terry Cassidy, John Ford, Richard Hudson, Brian Willoughby, Clive Pearse, Chris Parren were the full band. Albums were Suspended Animation and Nasty Habits; the latter notable for their most well known hit, Nice Legs, Shame About Her Face.
:I've now added The Monks (punk band) (for want of a better name) on this other band, and will add a suitable notice to the top of the merged The Monks page. --David Edgar 15:18, 5 October 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Monks confusion
Talk:Anacamptis

message: What does this mean:
"They all have a diploid chromosome number of 32 or 36."
I take it the "of" is superfluous, but is the number 32 or 36 correlated with anything, or random? Pdn 02:06, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Kew is the top authority on orchids. In their "Kew Scientist" of October 1997, issue 12, Dr. Pridgeon clearly states : 
" Perhaps the most exciting is that the type genus Orchis, as currently circumscribed, is polyphyletic.
The 33 species fall into three distinct, well supported clades: the Orchis militaris clade with 18 species (including the genus Aceras) all having a diploid chromosome number of 42, the O. ustulata clade with five species (including the genus Neotinea) all with a diploid number of 42 plus one B-chromosome, and the O. morio clade with 13 species (including the genus Anacamptis) having a diploid number of 32 or 36.
See here on page l :   JoJan 05:45, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
Talk:Community areas in Chicago

message: How about adding an infobox template to the neighborhood articles instead of a custom table for every one? Cacophony 18:51, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It might be nice to have an overlay or an alternative version of the map with major landmarks--rivers, big parks, interstate highways, etc. marked.  I was trying just now to figure now where Midway Airport was on this map and it was not easy!  A few key landmarks would help people get a sense of where these community areas actually *are* in the city.  Look at how useful this map is, for example:
http://www.wildonions.org/NeighborhoodsMap.htm
:This actually would not be hard to create based on maps I made for Wikitravel. If someone is interested in doing this and who knows how to edit SVG files, all maps are available here.  --Peter Talk 23:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roads, Landmarks? 

message: Does anyone know the proper way to add City of Chicago Neighborhood maps to the neighborhood templates or to the pages. TonyTheTiger 01:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  City of Chicago Neighborhood maps 

message: --Does anyone know why the population and population density numbers are constantly changing and inaccurate on individual community area neighborhood pages? They seem to change at least monthly and constantly conflict w/ other census #'s I've seen. Shouldn't they be based off of 2000 census #'s? 98.206.218.29 (talk) 15:46, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Populations

message: Much more informative (and seemingly accurate) description of the origin and concept of these areas in Amanda Seligman's article3 in the Encyclopedia of Chicago (http://encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/319.html). Suggest that someone incorporate this material if I don't get around to doing so.  Sjsilverman (talk) 15:39, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of Chicago Community Areas - Encyclopedia of Chicago

message: Hey,
is there any official source for the divison of Chicago into sides? Where do the information about sides come from? I can't find anything about sides on Chicago's data portal.
--Kagawa (talk) 19:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source for sides?
Talk:West Ridge, Chicago

message: The result was Merge Golden Ghetto into West Ridge, Chicago. --B. Wolterding 16:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: At one time this neighborhood could be classified as middle to upper middle class, but those days are long gone.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.57.183.5 (talk) 18:29, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is still middle class by any reasonable standard, especially now that "middle class" has become a media trope for working class.  Most of West Ridge is better than working class.67.173.10.34 (talk) 04:08, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Economic Status of West Ridge   

message: The PNG map in the sidebar is incorrect -- Peterson Park isn't located in West Ridge, nor is it by the North Shore Channel of the Chicago River.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.226.43.30 (talk) 06:11, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peterson Park 
Talk:North Center, Chicago

message: Although I agree with the author that North Center is one of the most desirable areas of Chicago, the article has a promotional "gee whiz" quality that I do not really find appropriate in Wikipedia.  Anyone else have this reaction?  162.83.216.10 (talk) 06:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed (to the best of my recollection).  71.194.38.54 (talk) 09:38, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

text: No, it's not.  You can call a neighborhood anything you want, so I left the discussion of the immediate Irving Park-Damen-Lincoln area (referred to in the article as "Northcenter"; I am not sure of local practice) but if you are referring to the Chicago Community Area of North Center, which is the topic of the article, the nomenclature is decided by the City of Chicago Department of Planning and Development, following guidelines established by the University of Chicago about 90 years ago.  71.194.38.54 (talk) 09:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Kudos to User:Bry456 for working to get the neighborhood names matched with what's currently in official use by the city government. I'm going to restore some of the previous names, as the city shouldn't be taken as the sole source for these names and some of them are still in popular use. I'm starting with St. Ben's, which is still currently in use, as evidenced by this message board and this article.
Ibadibam (talk) 09:57, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neighborhood names 

message: of Roscoe Village , ,  Victor Grigas (talk) 02:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  photos to migrate