lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
File talk:Cold mountain novel cover.jpg

message: This is just a temporary image I made myself in order to provide a "cover" for the article over Cold Mountain. If you have an image of the cover to the book and can provide it without copyright issues please go ahead and do so. --Ben Tibbetts 03:14, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There, fixed. Cover from Amazon.Com, enhanced by yours truly. Ben Tibbetts 03:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Please change this
Talk:Karlu Karlu / Devils Marbles Conservation Reserve

message: Is this section really necessary, with only one entry? The book itself only mentions the place for a page or so! AncientToaster (talk) 09:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Popular Culture" 

message: The article says
:The boulders are located in a traditional Aboriginal sacred site and are important to the local tribe. The Arrernte people believe that the boulders are the eggs of the rainbow serpent. Over time, the ceremonies and stories related to the Devil's Marbles have largely been lost, but the site is still very important to the tribe and may be considered to be amongst the oldest religious sites in the world.
Aren't the Devil's Marbles in Kaytetye country, not Arrernte? Dougg 03:18, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaytetye? 

message: See here: http://www.nt.gov.au/nreta/parks/find/devilsmarbles.html
And here's a letter to a Dutch Wikipedia member who asked about the spelling:
:The official spelling is "Devils Marbles Conservation Reserve" without the apostrophe. Apostrophes are as a general rule not to be used in place names and so also park names with the exception of "John Flynn's Grave Historical Reserve", as this is actually the grave of this person.
:Kind regards,
:Anita Tromp
:Regional Parks Assistant
:Parks & Wildlife NT
Floris V 17:13, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official Spelling without the apostrophe? 

message: Have the rocks always been like that, stood up, or were they put like that by man? The article ought to clarify. Yeanold Viskersenn 04:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Natural? 

message: (copied from above to repeat the issues)
Is this section really necessary, with only one entry? The book itself only mentions the place for a page or so! AncientToaster (talk) 09:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I repeat the question - it is not in Australian popular culture I think it should be removed - as it attracts unnecessary additions SatuSuro 05:51, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Popular Culture"
Talk:Raginpert

message: I believe the dates mentioned here need review:
 * "king of the Lombards briefly in 701"
 * "usurped the throne in 701"
No problem thus far but it continues with:
 * "Duke of Turin 671 – 702"
 * "King of the Lombards 702"
The question being did he reign briefly in 701 or in 702?
Perhaps his reign was 701-702, or perhaps all dates should be 701/702.
Adding to the confusion is the hyperlink at the end... a link to 701 deaths.
--Dogfish 03:21, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:California scrub jay

message: I've found slightly conflicting information about nest building duties by the sexes in the Petersen guides vs the Audubon books.  Any correction or clarification is welcome.  DDugan 03:32, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Nest building

message: I have a pair of these birds living near my house, and they are quite aggressive with other birds, especially Steller's Jays, and also very bold when it comes to humans. After only three days of intermittent feeding of peanuts (in the shell), I got both of them to repeatedly fly up and take a peanut out of my open hand, and today one of them landed on my shoulder to get a peanut I had tucked into a fold in my jacket.
They are also plucky thieves: They think nothing about coming in my open garage door and helping themselves to the peanuts strewn along my workbench.
All in all they are pretty fascinating birds.
Farnsworth1968 08:35, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Behavior

message: I live in california's central valley and it's very quiet, all accept for this damn scrub jay blasting its profane AAAARRRRYYEEEEE AAAARRRRYYYEEEEE CHEYECK CHEYEK CHEYECK CHEYECK CHEYECK call from 5:30AM to 11:30AM, louder than a world war II air raid siren. I've resorted to purchasing several high-powered airsoft and metal pellet rifles (400FPS-1000FPS-6MM-.22 Rounds) in the hopes of pelting them back to their origin in hell. Possible to add how annoying and loud they are?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.247.228.104 (talk) 14:08, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: incredibly annoying
Talk:Robert Kennicott

message: In a visit to the nature center at Glencoe, I found a trove of Robert Kennicott's papers and specimens. Smithsonian in DC has more. --Wloveral (talk) 18:55, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Much to add 

message: I suppose this is trivia, but the docent at the Grove told me that initially the state of Alaska was to be named Kennicott, but that Mr. Kennicott didn't want it named after him.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaxelrod (talk • contribs) 04:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming of Alaska 

message: I added a mention of the long travel by his corpse to the family homestead and gravesite, per a poster I saw at the Grove last summer. However, I'm hundreds of miles away, so I hope someone can fix the citation.Jweaver28 (talk) 21:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Corpse route
Talk:Stevie Ray

message: Booker T's wiki article says that Booker T was the youngest of 8 children, but this artivcle says that stevie ray was the younger brother... what the fuck
:No, this article does not say anything about Lane being younger than Booker. This article says "his younger brother Booker T", meaning "Lane's younger brother Booker T", meaning "Lane has a younger brother called Booker T". I think you must have misread the sentence. NiciVampireHeart 14:08, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  the older brother? 

message: Probably just me being nitpicky, but the article refers to Booker Huffman as "better known as King Booker." Really, though, isn't he better known as Booker T? He's just most recently known as King Booker. Sorry if this doesn't belong here. It just really bugged me for some reason. 75.206.15.120 06:11, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nitpicking 

message: Stevie Ray should reunite with Booker T just for one night only as the Harlem Heat in the WWE or in TNA (now that Booker is in there). Just like Triple H and Shawn Michaels did to reunite D-Generation X last summer.
P.S.: Stevie's finisher looked like an inverted mat slam after the double underhook position instead of a facebuster. jlog3000 (talk) 18:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm with ya!69.243.42.251 (talk) 01:52, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible return of Harlem Heat for one night only

message: A cited reference from onlineworldofwrestling had been added indicating that Ray had died of a heart attack. The reference linked said nothing of the sort. Am removing references to Stevie Ray's alleged death unless reliable sources are found. PeteF3 (talk) 22:21, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Alleged death

message: Here is a good picture of him  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.125.216.45 (talk) 23:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: That image is most likely copyrighted. It would have to be uploaded under a fair-use rationale, but as Huffman is still live it would fail WP:NONFREE, wikipedia's fair-use guidelines and ultimately be deleted; see WP:NFC#UUI. As he's still alive, it is entirely plausible that someone, somewhere will take a free image of him that we can use. NiciVampireHeart 21:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Trabancos (river)

message: Can someone please take a look at the original of the passage that has been translated:Entering into land in the municipality of Pollos, the stream stops to form river terraces, cutting traversely and lowering enough (between 40 and 60 meters) to meet the terrace deposits of the Duero River.I would love to rearrange the wording for fluidity, grammar, etc. but I'm just not sure of exactly what the passage means (a few interpretaions are possible), and I'll only muck it up if I try to fix it when I don't understand well what is intended.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:38, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Section requiring help

message: The article is somewhat too technical for most readers... Shannon1talk contribs 00:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Writing style
Talk:Banking in the United States

message: I believe that this article can go to Good Article status . I will edit and format certain section but I won't nominate or participate in the actual nom as it is time consuming. The main problem is length, contrary to what editors might believe, this is not Economy of the United States or Economy of New York City. The former two articles are very detailed and substantial. Banking in the United States should have a clear prominent lead giving it an overview and serve as a directing page. For example, instead of having a section called "History" and simply copying/pasting all of what is on the History of banking in the United States, write a small introduction and link a MA to it. Future editors: feel free to use the space below to hash out improvements. LivinRealGüd (talk) 03:31, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good Article project post
Talk:Basilica Julia

message: I really don't know the status of the copyright for the picture I submitted.  It belongs to Adolph Bruderhausen.  I don't know whether he is alive or dead, whether he copyrighted the picture as a company or as an individual.  It appears that he copyrighted it as an individual. There are several other wonder drawings of Roman buildings in restored state in the source book, The Forum and the Palatine by Christian Huelsen. Californicus 03:58, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: When I said 'belongs to,' I spoke in the present tense.  Actually, I don't know whether the copyright is still in force or has passed into public domain. Californicus 04:00, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adolph Bruderhausen--copyright 

message: What happened to Basilica Julia? The last dated reference is AD 283 when it was rebuilt. It might be likely that it may have been destroyed in the various sackings of Rome or been dismantled to be used for building materials through the years. --TGC55 (talk) 09:08, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last dated reference to Basilica Julia?
Talk:Realbasic/Archive 1

message: The last example, using HTTPSocket.Get, needs a timeout parameter. Otherwise Get operates in asynchronous mode and the page data is received in a PageReceived event.
: The example has been removed. Kiam 14:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problem with HTTPSocket example 

message: (Moved from main article Malcolm Farmer 17:39, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Calls for a boycott
Talk:Sheriff (band)

message: I think When I'm With You was also famous for having the longest note in a song.--Westendgirl 04:08, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: My husband and I danced to When I’m with you at 17. We are now at the young age of 56! I would love to surprise him with you singing the song that made us one! Thank You for your beautiful music!. Kim 184.83.218.62 (talk) 05:39, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Junior Prom
Talk:Section 92(10) of the Constitution Act, 1867

message: There's an similar article called declaratory_power, about the same thing.
However, that article also deals with Scotland's declaratory article.  I'm not sure what to do.
Some scenarios:
-move all information about Declaratory Power FROM this W&U article into the Declaratory Power article.
-move all information about Declaratory Power INTO this W&U article, and then delete the un-needed article.
-keep separate, as is, due to the Scottish information in the other article.99.245.173.200 17:39, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging with Declaratory Power article? 

message: One could complete this article with references to:
-The Empress Hotel case which establishes the principle that one person or corporate entity can operate multiple businesses or undertakings that are distinct from one another;
-Criticism of the Bell 1905 case with reference to its incapacity to distinguish the operator from the undertaking and rehabilitating the decision of the Quebec Court of Queen's Bench decision in Regina v. Mohr (1881);
-Criticism of the interpretation of the Radio reference as establishing jurisdiction over content while the matter discussed is clearly radio communication without any reference to the regulation of content.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.80.160.170 (talk) 18:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Further additions 

message: Should “anciliary” in the Extent of jurisdiction section be “ancillary”? Wprlh (talk) 21:10, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo?
Talk:Section 91(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867

message: I deleted the segment stating that PIPEDA was "upheld" as a valid exercise of Parliament's trade and commerce power. There were no citations provided, and as far as I'm aware, no court has ever been asked to rule on the constitutional validity of PIPEDA.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.6.173 (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

message: An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trade and commerce. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so.  Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Trade and commerce" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Medal Of Honor: Frontline

message: Merge Don't see why there need to be seperate articles for different versions, when this article contributes nothing ne. R.E. Freak 04:25, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In agreeance, there isn't even a difference between the two besides the capital "O" in "of".  70.48.15.140 22:00, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Black Butte (Oregon)

message: Would it be possible to to update the picture for the butte. the current one is outdated, blurry, and doesn't really reflect how it currently looks. Ryoga-2003 23:58, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There's no reason a newer picture cannot be included.  I don't happen to know of a source or have a newer picture.  Perhaps someone else does. --Burntnickel 02:09, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: taken and added.  --a self called nowhere (☎) 22:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture

message: Since there is also a Black Butte in California, wouldn't a disambiguation be in order? Gershwinrb 04:26, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambig
Talk:Malisheva

message: @laof2017, I don't know why I was so convinced by the fact that Malisheva is an Albanian toponym, but in fact, it's not. As Ktrimi correctly pointed out, it would sound differently if it were from Alb. "mal-". AlexBachmann (talk) 20:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  From Mal-i or Malesh
Talk:Orly

message: this page has been targeted by vandalism... again! Sertrel 20:38, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: vandalism

message: The term "O RLY" is a common Fark Cliche (and probably just a global Internet meme by now).  This page is vandalized frequently.  I'm applying for semi-protection.  --BakerQ 16:23, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Fark Cliche
Talk:Flavian Palace

message: The source book for the picture of the Domus Flavia was published in 1928, but copyrighted in 1927 by Adolph Bruderhausen.  I did a search for his name on familysearch.org and found only a handful of Bruderhausens in the US--all in New York state where the book was published.  There is one Adolf Bruderhausen who lived 26 Oct 1880 to August 1962.  Fifty years plus 1962 is 2002.  The new copyright laws didn't come into affect until 2004, so this picture is public domain IF I have the right Adolf/Adolph Bruderhausen.  Perhaps, he spelled his name Adolph to avoid the similarity with Adolf Hitler. Californicus 04:28, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

message: You give a good overview of the layout of the palace and the picture was helpful. I was hoping that you could include something on the present state of the palace, and also maybe oneor two important events that took place there. The article is well formated and easy to read and understand, good job!
Jim944928 21:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Solid artical
Talk:Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa

message: Currently, it says the church is 39th on the list of largest US churches.  That was in 2007.  The church does not make it on the 2013 list of the top 100 churches.  http://www.outreachmagazine.com/2013-outreach-100-largest-churches-america-page-2.html   Also, who is the current pastor?  Does he have a radio ministry?  I think so but I'm not certain if he's still on the air.  2605:E000:AD90:6100:E5F9:609B:532:7ADC (talk) 21:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Please Update

message: Calvary Chapel Costa Mesa was started in 1961 by Floyd and Lois Nelson who were Four Square Ministers. They left the denomination just before the church started. Chuck Smith became pastor in 1965. So Chuck Smith was not the founding pastor. He was appointed pastor after the board voted out Rev's Floyd and Lois Nelson.  66.74.128.231 (talk) 04:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founding Pastors
Talk:Bernhard Frank

message: :Frank was reportedly one of the few SS officers inducted into the rites at Wewelsburg Castle, and after the war claimed that he had arranged the eventual surrender of Berchtesgaden to prevent needless damage to the structure.
Wewelsburg is in the northwest of Germany; Berchtesgaden in the southeast.
Is "the structure" supposed to mean the Berghof (which is in Obersalzberg, in Berchtesgaden)?
A reference would be good in any case.
Greg Price 04:40, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Schutzstaffel ;
;    ;
;     ;
;  nbsp ;
;  br ;
;  word wrap ;
;  soft return ;
;  nonbreak ;
;  nonbreaking .
Thank You,
;[[ hopiakuta  | [[  %c2%a1   %c2%bf   %7e%7e   %7e%7e  -]] 13:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  surrendered to preserve "the structure"... 

message: Is the entire last section lifted from some unnamed source? I deleted the "last weekend" paragraph. Added many citation needed tags too. I even wonder if this guy is notable. The story was in the 8 December 2010 NYTimes. Let's see if anyone is coming to read this poor page.  Paul, in Saudi (talk) 10:56, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: My, this is bad!

message: "In 1943, Frank was appointed head of security at the SS base of Obersalzberg, the beloved mountain residence of Adolf Hitler located in southern Germany.
It was then that Frank was given a personal order by Hitler to kill Hermann Göring ..."
That is, in 1943 ?
Did the author sleep during history lessons ?
--Ft93110 (talk) 11:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I wonder if we ought to delete the whole thing. I am very concerned about some of these claims that are not backed up. How do I post a 'BLP notice? Paul, in Saudi (talk) 13:52, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the entire "Gould's Investigation", which is unreferenced and which contains extensive unattributed quotes, all in violation of WP:BLP, WP:RS, WP:V, and basic standards of good referencing practice. The remaining stub needs to be checked against the extant references; in particular the spectacular claim. Acroterion (talk) 16:22, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not convinced of this person's notability either. A deletion debate might prove useful. Acroterion (talk) 16:32, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: My, this is bad! 2
Talk:Ramo Nakajima

message: This article is very, very biased, and needs to be rewritten in order to remove the POV. --日本穣 Nihonjoe 04:43, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Deerpark, New York

message: I'm about to start a whole lot of research on Deerpark, so within the next several months, this article should be, hopefully, up to good article standard.  Chuck 04:44, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I added these tags because the Cuddebackville article isn't really needed unless it can be xpanded a lot further. At this point in time, all the information from the Cuddebackville article can go into this one. Chuck(척뉴넘) 07:19, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, since the information is pretty much duplicated, and no objections were brought, I'm going to change the content of Cuddebackville, New York to redirect to this article. Chuck(척뉴넘) 06:17, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge from tag 
File talk:Rycina 1752 Palac Branickich.jpg

message: I tried looking for the source online, but I couldn't find an exact version. Nonetheless the very NAME of this picture indicates its 250 years old. Surely it must be in public domain and source is not needed?--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 04:49, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is necessary for you to announce to protect this image with sysop powers, as that may as easily be unprotected by another sysop and the delete tag added and then protected again. The image has no source. The image has no author. Assumption is not good enough, sorry. Rules are the rules, if you have a source, then that's great there is no problem, but it needs to be stated. If the image is found again, then it can gladly be uploaded again no one would stop you, but until then I am afraid this image is not in compliance. Gryffindor 16:08, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The image is described as from 1752. This is as belivable piece of information as if the uploader would give a source or the author, right? Therefore we can assume this is a 1752 art piece and thus no matter what the source it public domian under Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp..--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 17:03, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What was the problem finding this image? The very first Google hit in a search for "+Branickich +palac" turns up the immediate source... painter still unknown, though. Piotrus, does the link (see img page) help you to track down the painter? Lupo 07:56, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't remember what keywords I used, but I know I found two pages of different images of this palace, none of them were a copy of that. The one you found states it is a sketch from 1752 by 'Rentz and Klemm'.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:46, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, it helps if one speaks Polish :-) I looked for "Rentza" and "Klemma" and didn't find much... Omitting the final "a", I found out that Johann Heinrich Klemm or Jan Henryk Klemm (1728 – 1758) was a baroque architect and one of the architects who built or extended the palace. Michael Heinrich Rentz (1701 - 1758) was an engraver born in Nuremberg, famous in his time. I don't know for sure that he is the Rentz that did this engraving, but it appears plausible and I haven't found any other likely candidate. Lupo 20:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nice history detective work, Lupo! Tnx! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:23, 12 April 2006 (UTC)