lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Face the Truth (Stephen Malkmus album)

message: Although the album is clearly influenced by Classic Rock, wouldn't "Indie Rock" be a better fitting choice for genre? After all, the other 3 SM albums are classified as such. Also, it's rock on an indipendent label. I just think Indie Rock fits better.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.179.223.59 (talk) 18:32, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Genre?
Talk:Bolton WtE

message: --Alex 12:22, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Grand Theft Auto 2 soundtrack

message: She has the song called "Need One" in the soundtrack. However, I don't recall exactly in which station and when it happens. Will try to review the soundtrack. Just leaving this here as a note. Halfang (talk) 03:46, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Martina Topley-Bird 

message: please leave the complete list of songs so that anyone can see the titles of the songs and maybe remembers some of them and fixes up the list ArmyDuck 21:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete list of songs 

message: Are all these songs made by a third party or does Rockstar compose some songs, especially the N/A ones? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Niftymatt (talk • contribs) 05:12, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rockstar Songs? 

message: What's with the all upper case?  RJFJR (talk) 16:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Case
File talk:World Map Gini coefficient.png

message: So what data was used to create this picture? -- 83.233.10.3 (or, User:Jobjörn) 12:24, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Puzzles me as well. The statement itself seems to show an even larger bias.Disciple of the Eighth Day 09:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Leila J. Rupp

message: Professor Rupp is a noted and recognized historian and feminist scholar.  Her publications regularly appear in peer-reviewed journals and she is a full professor as well as chair of the department of Women's studies at the University of California at Santa Barbara. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Canticle (talk • contribs) 12:31, 27 November 2006
:sounds like enough of an assertion to me.  But you'll have to defend her again in Articles for Deletion, because procedure is to move it there.  ColourBurst 23:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Intermezzo

message: In The Art of Cookery in the Middle Ages, Terence Scully (pg. 109) hints that the origins of the intermezzo can be found in the medieval entremets, the Old French term for a subtlety. This seems to make a lot of sense since subtleties provided a form of culinary entertainment that eventually evolved into completely inedible decorations made of wood and metal. By the end of the 15th century (in Capua, no less) they were already grandiose spectacles with actors portraying Roman and Greek deities presenting the various courses at lavish banquets. The etymology certainly seems to support this connection. Any comments?
Peter Isotalo 12:39, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes indeed.  They then developed into extravagant masque-like dramatic entertainments in 16th century courts, held in a different location from the meal. This certainly needs covering. Johnbod (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Are you thinking perhaps of the intermedio?  Antandrus  (talk) 13:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, yes, I thought we did have something. I don't think the two terms are anything like as distinct as these articles imply. Roy Strong in Art and Power; Renaissance Festivals 1450-1650, 1984, The Boydell Press;, uses "intermezzo" throughout to describe large-scale affairs like those in "intermedio".  At the very least this article needs to link there. 
Johnbod (talk) 14:42, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the New Grove, "Intermezzo" is sometimes used to describe the works inserted between the acts of Renaissance comedies.  However they write it up under "Intermedio", which is the Italian word for the same thing.  (That's the article I used to write the Intermedio article, way back whenever that was.)  It's really just a choice of using an English vs. the Italian word for the things ... which were quite a big deal in Florence and other northern Italian cities.  Cheers, Antandrus  (talk) 15:04, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This doesn't agree with Strong - oddly enough "intermezzo" is "the Italian word" for it too! In Strong & his notes "Intermèdes" appear only in French; the Italian & English scholars use "intermezzo".  "Masque" would be one English word. At the moment the article doesn't even link to any of these.  Johnbod (talk) 15:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

text: See also Britannica "Intermezzo". Johnbod (talk) 17:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:Nonnebakken

message: Thanks to Valentinian for confirming my interpretion of the danish source
A quick attempt at a translation about the spade goes like this:
The ring castle's southern moat was investigated during a dig in Allégade, due to a planned works to lay down central heating piping. The moat turned out to have been at least three meters deep. Its breadth: around 11 meters. The moat had been filled up over several occations [so it has been filled partially up once, and this work was continued much later]. Finds included a preserved spade made of oak tree, dated by dendro-chronology to the functioning era of the fort. No traces of the moat['s structure] or its bank.
I'm afraid this means that they were unable to find traces of the wooden structure.
copied from my talk page. --T.woelk 12:47, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The oak Spade 

message: Apart from the map by Braunius I mentioned in my last edit (unfortunately, PD-art does not apply in Denmark, I will look for a copy somewhere) Nonnebakken apparently also appears on a 1795 map of Hunderup Parish. . The relevant entry is no. 7. Valentinian T / C 09:02, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The Braunius map seems to be the same map as in my link at the bottom of the page (external links). As I state in the text: the map was made in 1593 though published later. My www.museum.odense.dk link seems to be better than your .museum.odense.dk  one as it leads to this large version of the map hihi. If the ramps are indeed mapped as late as 1795, I wonder wether there is some info to be found from the time (1837?) the house that the lodge now resides in (bought the villa in 1929?) was build.--T.woelk 11:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I should have noticed that you'd already linked to the map, and your version is better :) I don't think anything of value was registered when the villa was built. Otherwise it ought to have been included in the list from www.dkconlike.dk. Unfortunately, Hans Baggesen's description of the Monarchy doesn't mention the structure at all, I just checked. (Hans Baggesen, "Den danske Stat" (1840)). A very old copy of Fyens Stiftstidende perhaps? In 1876, 30 skeletons were found on "Nonnebjerg" east of the other site. The newspaper then speculated that it might have been related to the site, but if we have no other information to go on, it would probably have been related to the nunnery. Perhaps there might be something in "Middelalderbyen Odense" by Anemette S. Christensen (1988). I've not read it. Valentinian T / C 12:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other maps 
Wikipedia talk:Reference desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2006 October 16

message: I have had discussions with people concerned in regards to the article on ECOPAVE on this page and apparently because this page has been edited to the extent that it is no longer factual but distorted and out of context it should be therefore deleted. Also because this page serves no real purpose other than paint the ECOPAVE company and its trademark protected words Trademark dilution in bad light bad faith, Fact Finder2 13:08, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive140

message: I have had discussions with people concerned in regards to the this titled Walled garden/spammers article content on this page and apparently because this page has been edited to the extent that it is no longer factual but distorted and out of context it should be therefore deleted. Also because this page serves no real purpose other than paint the ECOPAVE company and its trademark protected words Trademark dilution in bad light bad faith, Fact Finder2 13:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Why I Want to Fuck Ronald Reagan

message: "Slow-motion film of Reagan's speeches produced a marked erotic effect in an audience of spastic children" 
Probably the Greatest qoute of all time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.223.231.3 (talk) 13:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  lol ..! Incidentally, which wikigenius added this entry to the 'psychology books' category? Garrick92 10:15, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Obviously, one of the cats from the 1980 RNC. 68.122.1.193 03:29, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  A marked erotic effect
Template talk:Enzyme cofactors

message: There are two versions of this template:  Template:Vitamin is the other one.  I think it's confusing to have two and that this one should be deleted.  See discussion on Talk:Vitamin.  --Coppertwig 13:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: At this time there are numerous non-vitamin enzyme cofactors listed in the template, so it's a valid template. --Hyperforin (talk) 17:50, 5 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Versions
Talk:Hull and East Riding Hospital

message: The following section was removed from the article as it did not really fit, rather than discard completely placed it here -
How to find Hull and East Riding Hospital
From the west: 
Take the M62 which continues into the A63. Take the exit signed Humber Bridge, then go straight across the first two roundabouts onto the A1105, signposted Hospital - Hyperbaric Unit. At the next roundabout turn left to Anlaby on the B1232, take the right fork at the mini-roundabout and the hospital is on the left. 
From the Humber Bridge: 
Turn right at the first roundabout onto the A1105, signposted Hospital - Hyperbaric Unit. Turn left at the next roundabout into Anlaby on the B1232. Take the right fork at the mini-roundabout and the hospital is on the left. 
From Hull city centre: 
Follow the Anlaby Road A1105 from the centre of town until it forks. Take the left fork and continue along the A1105, which changes to Boothferry Road, following the signs for the Humber Bridge. Turn right towards Anlaby on the B1232, signposted Hospital - Hyperbaric Unit.  Take the right fork at the mini-roundabout and the hospital is on the left. 
From Beverley: 
Take the A164 towards the Humber Bridge. At the roundabout by the Bridge take a left turn onto the A1105 signposted Hospital - Hyperbaric Unit. At the next roundabout turn left to Anlaby on the B1232, take the right fork at the mini-roundabout and the hospital is on the left.
Keith D 13:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Directions
Talk:New York State Route 169

message: My map shows that NY-169 begins at the Thruway and crosses NY-5S in the northwest corner of Danube, New York, not Little Falls. Stepp-Wulf 01:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Your map may not be sufficiently detailed. Traffic leaving the Thruway via interchange 29A feeds directly onto NY 169 North, after passing over NY 5S. As NY 169 begins from NY 5S just to the west of that overpass, it bends right to meet a four-way intersection: Right is the Thruway, straight ahead is "General Herkimer Road" (dead end), and left is NY 169 north. The segment between that intersection and the Thruway toll booth may be maintained in its entirety by the Thruway Authority, as I could not note any reference route number for it. Some maps may mark that section NY 169 out of convenience, but it is an error. See this image facing southbound; the visible overpass is the segment that reaches the Thruway, and you may be able to make out the East/West NY 5S shields just under the END NY 169 sign. As for the Town of Danube being the location of the terminus: You are free to be bold and make that edit to both this article as well as the one for NY 5S.Fwgoebel 02:21, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Southern terminus of route?
Talk:New York State Route 51

message: *Pre-1930 designations:
**W Winfield-Ilion via E Winfield was part (virtually all) of Route 23-a (legislative route assigned in 1912)
**W Burlington-W Winfield was part of 44 (assigned b/n 1924 and 1926)
*1930 - 51 assigned to all of its routing south of Ilion, unclear to North Ilion
**1930 GD shows a "first class" highway across the Mohawk from Ilion-N Ilion
**1935 RMcN shows it as a "mainline paved road"
*However, the part of 51 north of Clark Street in Ilion (old 5S) is SH 84001 while south of it is SH 5513 - implying that the 5S-5 portion was not assigned at the same time
**The original Ilion-N Ilion roadway was configured differently near N Ilion and used a different bridge ()
**1938 GB does not show roadway; 1938-62 GD maps (38,42,47,54,62), 1961 Gousha, and 1964 RMcN show it as unnumbered
**current bridge over Mohawk was built in 1968 ()
**1968 GD appears to show the roadway as part of 51
**1970 DOT log has the terminus at NY 5 in N Ilion – TMF 03:12, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  History notes
Talk:New York State Route 331

message: This is one of those rare instances where I partly (only partly) feel like doing a revert. Not gonna do that though; the addition of the Montgomery County reference marker is great. The mileage of 3.1 is just the Fulton County portion of NY 331. To put in the entire original 331 routing would mean having to change the overall length. (The reference to gribblenation concurs on the Fulton County portion). When I drove 331, I couldn't do the Montgomery county section because a bridge is out on CR 57 long-term (I did my drive on Thanksgiving). Putting it in would also mean having to place a decommissioned label on NY 5; I suppose it's possible but the mileage can't be exact until I can determine exactly which St. Johnsville street is the original route. For now, given that winter should be coming, let it be noted that the route length is inaccurate, and in the spring or at some other point, perhaps I can get the actual route length. Fwgoebel 17:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: NYSDOT traffic logs show 2.93 miles in Fulton and 0.17 miles in Montgomery. --Polaron | Talk 17:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

text: (edit conflict) Please see the NYSDOT Traffic Count for NY 305 to NY 427, which indicates that (1) the route length given in the article is accurate and (2) when I added the Montgomery section in my fix, I only added the 0.17 miles that currently exists in Montgomery County. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 17:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you (both) for pointing that out, I will only say that the reference markers themselves don't tell the story of the route. There are no markers in Montgomery County, and the Fulton County ones are marked as if the second county of the route. I would have to go back to the markers themselves to see what the last one is at the NY 29 terminus. My drive, though, indicated 3.0 miles (nearest tenth, and it was southbound). Once in Montgomery County, the route changes immediately and is far from State Highway standards. It looks like the county route that it is. Plus, a sign "END 331" is right at the county marker. Fwgoebel 21:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The NYSDOT quad (which I just looked at to write part of this route's history) shows that NY 331 (what little that exists) is concurrent with CR 57 in Montgomery County and is thus maintained by the county, which explains why it is not up to SH standards and looks like a county road. That also explains why there are no reference markers for the part of the route in Montgomery County. – TMF 22:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Montgomery County Section
Talk:World Museum

message: Some coverage should be given on this page regarding the number of deaths that have happened here since it's re-opening as the World Museum. I'm not as eloquent as some people can be, I'm sure they could give it better coverage than I can....I've given it my attempt as a writeup
195.188.28.116 13:18, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: No mention is made of Biology. I am cautious to do it but I could copy part of The Phycologist.(spring 2007) No.72  p.37. What do you think.Osborne 12:49, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Biology

message: Does anyone have a source for the third death? Glennh70 13:10, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  why does it say 'three deaths' and then give details of two? 
Talk:Fishersville, Virginia

message: It has a library, and a big one. It is called the Augusta County Library.  {{bob 22:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Library 
Talk:New York State Route 103

message: I placed the shunpiking entry on this page as I personally engaged in this activity using that particular route. A Thruway toll of 80 cents (Albany 24 to Amsterdam 27) could be reduced to 20 cents (Albany 24 to Schenectady 25) (that goes back about 20 years, when I started working near Albany yet was a college student living near Gloversville). Now, I did link to the shunpiking article; that article mentions possible original research. So before I place the NY 103 as a "see also" under shunpiking, I am looking for guidance. My "original research" is my own life experience, taught to me by my parents and reinforced by others with whom I traveled. Fwgoebel 13:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shunpiking entry
Talk:New York State Route 154

message: Contrary to the termini listed at Gribblenation (US 4/NY 22), none of the maps I have (spanning from 1935 to 1977) show NY 154 extending any farther west than NY 66 or farther east than Poestenkill. The termini given in the 1970 DOT route log matches the maps. I've rewritten the article accordingly. – TMF 02:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: a 1979 GD map gives the WT of NY 154 as US 4, but still has the ET in Postenkill at modern NY 351. – TMF 04:09, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes
Talk:New York State Route 66

message: I have a full line using an extra  tag to distinguish between NY 203 and To Taconic State Parkway. But I think it's too much space. Without the extra , the images are in my opinion too close together. So if anyone is able to adjust vertical spacing (perhaps just ⅓ or ½ of a line), please do so (and let me know how you did it). Fwgoebel 20:04, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vertical Spacing in Chatham 

message: Is it necessary to have a note about US 66 in this article? If US 66 ever entered New York, I'd have no problem with it, but the farthest east that the route ever got was Chicago. --TMF Let's Go Mets - Stats 21:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  US 66 note?
Talk:Man Gyong Bong 92

message: Was it the allegations or the missile parts which were made by the North Korean defector?  It's not clear.  Earldelawarr (talk) 20:33, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-northkorea-russia-ferry-idUSKCN18E2AA
104.156.98.201 (talk) 03:33, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: New service to Vladivostok

message: I realise that it is the name of a hill near Pyongyang, but what does Man Gyong Bong (만경봉) mean? Davidships (talk) 19:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name - meaning 

message: The section about tourism implementation should be removed or at least rewritten. It seems there has been a mix-up regarding which ship was converted into a cruise liner for the 2011 trial run. The New York Times article mentions the ship in question being 40 years old, which would match the original Man Gyong Bong but not Man Gyong Bong 92, which was about 20 years old at the time. Washington Times mentions it being a Japanese-built ship and talks about a plaque commemorating Kim Il-sung's visit to the ship in 1972, 20 years before Man Gyong Bong 92 was built. Plus, the ship pictured in both articles doesn't look like the 92 to me. One picture even shows the name on the ship's side being Man Gyong Bong without the 92. Lentokonefani (talk) 11:34, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I agree that the two vessels have become intertwined. As they are both part of a single overall story.  I suggest that the material concerning the earlier vessel is gathered together in a new subsection of "Background", and not removed. Davidships (talk) 14:38, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong ship?
Talk:Museum Planning Area

message: Pictures to come soon. - SpLoT (*T* C+u+g+v) 15:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Only worth a start-class. No infobox Leidiot 18:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I realize. - SpLoT (*T* C+u+g+v) 00:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Please see discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 December 1#Category:Museum. Thank you. —Sengkang 02:31, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed category renaming
Talk:Planning areas of Singapore

message: Western Isles redirects to the Outer Hebrides page, though evidently it shouldn't.--86.146.77.178 16:10, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

message: :Turned it into a disambg page.--Huaiwei 06:29, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: i noted that the link for the Singapore River didn't work, looked at the source and found it to be referring to a planning area for which no article exists.  Likwise, I found that the articles for Ang Mo Kio and Ang Mo Kio Planning Area were 
similar but the planning area page was outdated and had limited information.  Is the page for Ang Mo Kio supposed to be for the present and the planning area for the future?  I don't really see the utility of this?  Why not merge them across the board?  If no one replies to me I will begin doing that.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DaronDierkes (talk • contribs) 07:37, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: what's the difference?