Talk:Adelaide Zoo

message: This material was deleted by 218.185.75.68 without explanation and for unknown reasons, and I have reverted to to the earlier version.  The reference for the information is given.  If it should be removed, please diuscuss here. Maias 01:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Historical controversy

message: No one gave JmaesBWatson to protect this. It's against the wiki law to protect zoo articles. 
:http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adelaide_Zoo&diff=prev&oldid=455353598
::These animals he reverted ARE at the Zoo. 58.7.128.239 (talk) 07:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animals 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Adelaide Zoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081102133832/http://www.news.com.au:80/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24575343-5005941,00.html to http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24575343-5005941,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I am not sure why this section belongs in this article - it reads like a directory, and Wikipedia is not a directory.  The list of displays may be okay, but the detailed list of every animal is way over the top, and impractical to maintain. I am in favour of removing the entire section, or perhaps leaving just the list of major displays. Any other opinions?--Gronk Oz (talk) 13:08, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there were no dissenting views in more than a month since this was raised, I have trimmed that excessively detailed list of animals.  I left the list of exhibits and the brief descriptions where they had one. --Gronk Oz (talk) 23:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exhibits section needs to be drastically reduced, or removed altogether 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Adelaide Zoo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160111142512/http://apps.planning.sa.gov.au/HeritageSearch/HeritageItem.aspx?p_heritageno=1563 to http://apps.planning.sa.gov.au/HeritageSearch/HeritageItem.aspx?p_heritageno=1563
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160111142511/http://apps.planning.sa.gov.au/HeritageSearch/HeritageItem.aspx?p_heritageno=1561 to http://apps.planning.sa.gov.au/HeritageSearch/HeritageItem.aspx?p_heritageno=1561
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0%2C22049%2C24575343-5005941%2C00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The several groups of related images are excellent but disturbing visually due to different heights. Perhaps someone with the necessary skills could do the honors. Doug butler (talk) 21:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Multiple images