Talk:Infallibility (Bahá'í)

message: There may be more Attributes that are apropos. This is a start. jmswtlk 16:16, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

message: This is my order. Please alter as you see fit. Thanks. 
My only hope is that the subject gets the proper respect and acknowledgement. Of course, I’m showing my particular worldview in regard to IIOT. jmswtlk 17:56, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Outline

message: I've been reading this discussion page concerning life on planets and see reference to concepts that I tried to develop on this page. For instance, there was reference to 'falsifiability' in regard to a small likelihood that a sample across all known planets (if it were feasible to anyone human) would show that this statement ("Know thou that every fixed star hath its own planets, and every planet its own creatures, whose number no man can compute." 
(Bahá'u'lláh, Gleanings from the Writings of Bahá'u'lláh, p. 163)) was verifiable (type of true). On the other hand, there were discussions about the meaning of 'creature' which did reference the levels of spirit. This is one type of discussion example. There would be others that are more mundane (for example, from computer modeling of complicated systems – there are many others).
From where I sit, a Baha'i Philosophy of Science has not been defined, however it may be that such a thing is on the list of accomplishments that not only would be doable but that it is necessary and that it would have an 'operational' impact. jmswtlk 18:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello JMSwtlk, it may be possible to do such a thing, but it has to be done carefully so that it is not (or appear as) original work, since that is not what Wikipedia is supposed to be.  Mostly, it should reference the writings, or what other people have published about the writings. -- Jeff3000 18:18, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

text: Right. You'll notice in the discussion that we hit a wall when there were no references in the Baha'i writings to that particular situation. All we can do on wikipedia is reference what Baha'is believe or do, or repeat verifiable facts about history and social action. Writing an article about some unexplored philosophy will most likely be deleted. And I would support deleting such an article. Cuñado  - Talk 21:38, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tie to discussion about Life on other Planets

message: I put a set of 'Reminders (NPOV, no original research, verifiability)' on my organizing page. This will help dampen the enthusiasm about the greatness of the 'wiki' experience. 
Now, may we start over with this (and related) complicated subject? jmswtlk 14:38, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Again

message: These two topics, from a Baha'i viewpoint, very much ought to be their own pages and would support Faith and Science discussions. Yahyay19 00:29, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Epistemology, Ontology

message: This article doesn't read like an article at all. Vkasdg 07:07, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Style

message: I propose that we start this again. Either via blank page (I've done this already) or delete. Yahyay19 19:38, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I redirected the page. As mentioned above, the subject can be expanded on in Baha'i teachings or Manifestation of God. Cuñado  - Talk 00:55, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Start over