lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Plausible deniability

message: There are advancements in weaponized mind control techniques and methodologies that have rendered a true need to more openly discuss the once deniable aspects of clandestine civilian operations, due to the out-of-control nature of what has developed.
Concerns of National Security are trumped by concerns greater than International Security, there is a common threat developed that unites minds and has taken a turn for true danger to all of the cultures we know.
There is recoverability to any potential disclosures and their effects, however sensitive the matter may be.
A free-form system developed which is patterning reality to complex pattern with disastrous and intentional programming. This is presenting a series of events which is routinely showing the worst case scenarios as the very likely futures. Most timelines do not show well anymore due to this development in the veiled sciences.
This development went beyond the control of the parties involved and is now a self-proliferating force in existence.
The ability to openly discuss any sensitive matters must be coupled with a lack of retributive intentions, for that would delay the inevitable need to talk it out. The discussion itself could result in clearing up the threats presented by the new development's programming.
There is a noticed power over the system from truths. Which brings the need to help it sort itself from a truth-basis, which is currently in conflict due to many of the plausibly denied aspects of the clandestine forces of Earth interests.
Honestly, for the first time in history, the 100% truth may set us free from what's developed.
Thank you. 174.240.191.199 (talk) 22:56, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Sciences
Talk:Grigori Romanov

message: There is a somewhat longer stub article under the title "Grigory Romanov" -- can this one be simply turned into a redirect page, so that people who come to it using the alternate transliteration of his forename will go to the longer stub, and any expansion will be applied to that page, and no further energy wasted on this one.
Thanks
--Leighkimmel 00:11, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Gerard of Cremona

message: "In the astrology text, latitudes are reckoned from Cremona and Toledo."
:User:Bill Thayer has rightly noticed something wrong here and suggested in the html text "sounds most unlikely: shouldn't this be 'longitudes'"? Since the subject is astrology, my ignorant hunch is, shouldn't this be "angles of declension" or something similar? --Wetman 00:21, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Exasecond

message: Exasecond was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was CONSENSUS NOT REACHED
An amount of time that has no practical use. First, we don't use positive SI prefixes attatched to second in any practical way; we use times like days and years. Second (no pun please,) this amount of time is more than twice the universe's known age. How is this article useful?? 66.32.250.110 00:24, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:List of mathematical theorems

message: The fact that some things that fall short of mathematical rigor in some fields are called "theorems" does not appear to me to necessitate separate Wikipedia pages.  The existence of separate pages causes confusion: I listed Stanley's reciprocity theorem on the list of theorems page and it didn't occur to me that there was this other page on which I would want to list it for exactly the same reason.  A single "list of theorems" page could contain a note at the top saying that propositions conventionally called theorems that are not necessarily purely mathematical or that are not necessarily rigorously proved may also be included.  The overlap between things appropriate for one page and those appropriate for the other is absurdly high. Michael Hardy 00:40, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Why this page should be merged with [[list of theorems]]
Talk:Saint Joseph (disambiguation)

message: Obviously, the first sentence is a lie. In the New Testament, Joseph is not called Saint. Please advice. Rantaro 01:12, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: It's not a lie, it's just phrased in a way that honors the Wikipedia standards (obviously a concept you're not exactly acquainted with) of using "In $field, ..." and similar prefixes. But I've dropped the text, a simple link will do. --Joy [shallot] 09:55, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: According to the page for San Jose, California, the original name of the city was El Pueblo de San José de Guadalupe ("the town of St. Joseph of Guadalupe"). Does anyone know anything about this "San José de Guadalupe"? Is it just another styling for Joseph the husband of Mary, in the way that, e.g., Mary is also known as "the Virgin of Guadalupe" or "Our Lady of Lourdes", etc., etc.)? Or is it another "Saint Joseph" entirely? -- Narsil (talk) 04:32, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Saint Joseph of Guadalupe? 

message: The name of the article Saint Joseph is under discussion, see talk:Saint Joseph -- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 05:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Saint Joseph

message: The usage and primary topic for  is under discussion, see talk:San Giuseppe (disambiguation) -- 70.51.46.195 (talk) 05:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: San Giuseppe
Talk:HP-150

message: This wasn't, however, the first HP machine to use 3.5" Sony floppies. I'm afraid I can't remember the model name offhand. Four digits, beginning with a 9, I think. 
It was billed as a computer, not a calculator.
It came out circa 1983, maybe late 1982. It cost about $10,000 with 65K of RAM. It had a full bitmap-addressable CRT screen and built-in IEEE-488 interface. It was based on a 68000 processor, and aimed at the scientific and engineering market. It used a very nice, very sophisticated version of BASIC with all the usual control structures, optional line numbers, etc. Programs executed at very, very roughly 1000 lines of BASIC per second. A dual-floppy unit was the main form of storage; I don't believe a hard drive was a common option.
Oh, and it supported version of Context MBA, the now-forgotten program which completely out-featured 1-2-3 but had been written in Pascal and was therefore unusably slow on a PC, though perfectly acceptable on this HP machine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpbsmith (talk • contribs) 01:25, 25 October 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Various particulars
Talk:GE U25B

message: I tweeked the roster a bit. Wabash had 15 units, not 13. Pennsylvania's last unit was 2558, not 2559. The Burlington's six units were left off the roster and were added. The revised roster now reflects 478 units, this is correct as the two XP-24 Demonstrators were never sold. GE Demonstrators #753-756 went to the Frisco as their #804-807. GE #2501-2504 were sold to the UP as their #633, 635, 634, and 636. Three NYC U25Bs were rated at 2750 horsepower for test purposes in 1965.--SSW9389 22:35, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Roster 

message: CSX's ex L&N 1616 was retired in 1989, the end of operation for the model besides perhaps a few EMD rengined examples. Going to edit the article to correct it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.71.220.47 (talk) 00:00, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retirement date 

message: Friso #811 was built for the road in July 1963 in an order that included #808-#810, batch #1439 with a builder's number of 34563. She wasn't a member of batch #1364, which were GE demos #51-#54 that were later sold to Friso. Furthermore, she was built 8 months after the last batch of builder demonstrators were outshopped in December 1962. 2603:7081:C02:5700:E164:9746:B2EE:9C8F (talk) 11:11, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  There was no GE demo #55.
Talk:Skelmanthorpe

message: I think the statement:
:This trip involves going through the longest rail tunnel in the UK that's not owned by Network Rail or Transport for London.
is rather dubious. The Glasgow Subway is entirely underground, over 10km long, and not owned by either Network Rail or Transport for London. There may well be others. -- Chris j wood 01:32, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Railway tunnels 

message: I have discovered today that there is a museum in Skelmanthorpe!!  It is called the Textile Heritage Unit and is located at no. 6 Queen Street.  The museum is run by two elderly gentlemen (contacts are listed on the board outside) - the museum is opened upon request and although very small has a wealth of information including a weaver's loom, samples of work and various items of weaver's equipment.
Surely this should be included in the list of buildings?
Josh.beckett (talk) 19:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum 

message: The only chuch I am sure is active is St Aidens. Could anyone confirm the others?
Derf noxid 16:52, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Churches 

message: Surely Holmfirth ought to be included in this list?
Though Dewsbury is probably too far away/less accessible.
Josh.beckett 12:53, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nearby Towns 

message: The nickname for the inhabitants, is indeed Shat. This is explained at Skelmanthorpe#Shat. Ta. The joy of all things (talk) 09:31, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shat
Talk:Southeast Alaska

message: *Southeast Alaska Conservation Council
*Kayak journey through the Misty Fjords 
*Expedition through Southeast Alaska - a hiking and packrafting expedition from Seattle to the Aleutian Islands
AlaskaTrekker 17:49, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links?

message: Please see 
RE BC & Pacific Northwest History Forum re: Talk:List of United States military history events#Border Commission troops in the Pacific Northwest.  If you think maybe I should also move some or copy some of my other stuff from NW history and BC history pages  and various Indigenous peoples project article/talk pages let me know; I never mean to blog, but I'm voluble and to me everything's interconnected; never meaning to dominate a page so have made this area to post my historical rambles on.  Thoughts?Skookum1 03:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment on my posting of this: if anyone has any questions or wants to debate any issues relating to Oregon Country/Columbia District/Pacific Northwest history/historical geography, colonialist or aboriginal/indigenous or YT/AK or related topics, please feel free to drop by the forum and start a thread/topic, or just butt in at yer leisure.Skookum1 05:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User talk:Skookum1/BC&PacificNorthwestHistory|BC & Pacific Northwest History Forum]]

message: Nice map, but if it has Glacier Bay Park and Preserve shouldn't it also have Misty Fjords National Monument, which is a large chunk of the southern end of the Panhandle, and no less around the same size?Skookum1 (talk) 15:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Misty Fjords for map

message: Hi; this isn't primarily a history article but I thought maybe someone interested in the early history of the panhandle might want to read this.Skookum1 (talk) 23:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: historical background - British lease from Russians
Template talk:EMD diesels

message: Perhaps a little further reduction is needed for first-generation, second-generation, etc.  But where would the splits go?  slambo 02:02, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: In case you haven't noticed, this template is currently listed on WP:TFD.  The voting is in favor of keeping the template, but it's resurrected the thoughts of reducing the template's size.  One possibility is to split out the template into one template for each of the major classifications mentioned in this template (i.e. , , , etc.).  Since the template already separates the links into these groups, a template division along these lines would seem logical.  Thoughts? slambo 16:02, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
:It is a bit ungainly as it is, i think it should be split. --ZekeMacNeil 18:39, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where to split
Talk:Petrov Affair

message: Petrov Affair Exhibition--nixie 02:39, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

message: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KGB#The_Evolution_of_the_KGB says that the MVD became the KGB in 1953.
Yet here, in 1954, Petrov is called a member of the MVD.
Surely it should say KGB?
203.39.103.26 (talk) 01:10, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  MVD or KGB 

message: The comment to the effect that "The Petrovs had been sent to the Canberra embassy in 1951 by the Soviet security chief, Lavrenty Beria" is a bit off. Beria had lost his "security chief" position in January 1946 and didn't resume direct control of the Soviet security and intelligence agencies until after Stalin's death in March 1953.
Beria did exercise a degree of influence on the security apparatus in 1946-1953, though, so it's possible that Petrov was "Beria's man" and hence afraid to return to the USSR after Beria's fall. However, it's also possible that Petrov, who was, after all, only a colonel, had nothing to do with Beria and had other reasons to defect. The new Soviet leadership purged its security apparatus rather thoroughly in 1953-1954 and Petrov had reasons to be worried even if he was not a direct protege of one of the newly appointed fall guys like Abakumov and Beria.
Anyway, a source for Petrov's motives (his autobio? the 1987 Manne book?) would be nice. Ahasuerus 23:57, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Beria connection 

message: The article states that Evdokia Petrov was separated by 'ASIO agents' from her MVD minders - there are two problems with this: 1) She was not separated by ASIO 'agents', but by Northern Territory police officers. There are photographs that confirm this. 2) On a more minor note, ASIO employees should not be referred to as 'agents'. They are correctly called 'officers' as 'agents' is an American term that has a completely different meaning in the Commonwealth realms that follow the security service model established by MI5. I have changed the article accordingly. DirectEdge 23:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evdokia's liberation from MVD 

message: The National Museum of Australia says Lt Col: --Jack Upland (talk) 20:29, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colonel or Lieutenant Colonel?
Talk:American 4-4-0

message: This needs to be merged with 4-4-0.  slambo 02:57, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  The links in Template:Whyte types and on other pages already linked to 4-4-0 and more historical data existed on 4-4-0, so this page is now a redirect to it. slambo 17:07, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dish Network

message: It has been almost 4 years since you took Fox. Channel 7, Sunbeam off dish. I am losing football games!!!! End if the season and I can't  watch the DOLPHINS play!!!! 2600:1700:7741:3480:9DFB:3E2E:870A:B342 (talk) 01:52, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fox 

message: I THINK THIS IS A VERY VERY BAD BAD TO RUN A BUSINESS. WHY CAN'T I TALK TO ANYONE???????????? 2600:6C5D:4C00:45B:491E:A97D:BFA7:FFC2 (talk) 18:43, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have been trying to talk to someone for about 1 1/2 hours and have not been able 

message: I am getting ripped off they are seriously over charging me every month! I am so sick of overpaying and not having the channels I overpay for every month! I am very disappointed I’ve had dish for 20 years or more and they still charge for the equipment every month, I have paid way more than the price of equipment several times! I am very unsatisfied with the service I receive. Half the time it loses the signal and have to reset the whole system, which is very hard to see a show! This has gone on for way to long! I am sick of being over charged! I will be getting a new tv provider!!!! Dish you are losing customers I have talked to other people who are not satisfied with the service you provide they also are changing tv providers! I can’t believe I have put up with this for so long! It’s over for me! Kathy Conrad 2600:6C55:513F:7280:84B7:B779:483B:23A3 (talk) 19:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing local channels
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Trek

message: A proposal has been made to move the List of Star Trek episodes page into the List of Star Trek lists. Discussion Oldag07 (talk) 17:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged Oldag07 (talk) 18:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested merge 

message: I don't have the time momentarily, but if anyone has use of this clip I stumbled across at the Commons, apparently a Picard rebroadcaster mislicensed this clip at YouTube, and we may use it across the project if we want/need.  Just a heads-up!  —  Fourthords | =Λ= | 17:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Picard'' clip

message: A recent move relating to Star Trek (film) has broken over 500 links, some more obvious than others. Made some headway but would be good to fix all links 2A0A:EF40:277:FF01:B090:1457:CF1B:6603 (talk) 07:27, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like a completely unnecessary mess. You should post at Talk:Star Trek (2009 film) so the editors who made this decision can help clean it up. - adamstom97 (talk) 07:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent moves
Talk:Mountain Pointe High School/Archive 1

message: Mountain Pointe High School was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was CONSENSUS NOT REACHED
As of November 8th, 2004:
:DELETE = 8 vote(s)
:KEEP   = 7 vote(s)
:MERGE  = 1 vote(s)
:ABSTAIN= 2 comment(s)
----
Delete. Another non-notable high school. Indrian 03:18, Oct 25, 2004 (UTC)
* "first of its kind in its area" might be notable, depending on the definitions of "its kind" and "its area".  Also some things in there which could make it notable if and only if they are verified.  If being the "first of its kind in its area" turns out to be broad enough to be notable (i.e. it's not the first concrete-framed school within 400 yards of someone's house), and the scandals can be verified independently, K.  Otherwise D Chris 03:26, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Talk:AAR wheel arrangement

message: The intent of this page is to eliminate the duplication of text about locomotive wheel arrangements. Instead of adding 90 words to every new locomotive page to describe a particular wheel arrangement, merely insert an internal link to the already existing section in “AAR wheel arrangement”. For example, if a locomotive has a B-B wheel arrangement, put "B-B" in the Editing box. For more examples, click on “What links here” in the toolbox for “AAR wheel arrangement”. Rmeier 03:18, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article intent 

message: "three identical trucks" need they be identical?  Rich Farmbrough, 11:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Identical?

message: Just about every paragraph includes the phrase "...trucks, or wheel assemblies...". Is it necessary to repeat it each time? I think it would be more readable to use "trucks (or wheel assemblies)" in the first occurence, then simply "trucks" afterwards. Thoughts? (As an aside, I think the comma should be removed, or the phrase changed to "...trucks, or wheel assemblies,..." (with TWO commas), but better to drop the repetition altogether). MurfleMan (talk) 03:53, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Trucks, or wheel assemblies"? 

message: Explain 196.190.61.194 (talk) 18:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Wheel and Axle
Talk:SkyOS/previous discussion

message: I've tried to counteract some of the insane fanboyism here. This isn't a portal to boast about an OS's supposed capabilities - if you're going to do that, you MUST list the downsides as well. And SkyOS sure as hell has its downsides too.
Kiand 00:41, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fanboyism 

message: I notice that Thom has now gone to five reverts, two over the suggested limits (three). What I've done has not violated any Wikipedia policies, however promotion and constant reverting do.
 
Stop whinging about an article not being a perfect promo for you when you're violating rules.
Kiand 22:42, 21 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rule Violation 

message: It's great to see that this page now has the wrath of the SkyOS forums (Hexydres, Thom, GregV) coming in here to do nothing but revert. Sockpuppetry in the highest.
Kiand 14:27, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: At no stage have I asked anyone else to revert - check talk pages, etc if you want. However, what goes on in the private forums on SkyOS's site, I don't know. Oh, and large me arse. FreeDOS probably has more users Kiand 16:50, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  SkyOS Forums Sockpuppetry.
Talk:Criticality accident

message: While it's accurate enough at the moment - explaining both processes - it's obvious that some of it's left over from an overzealous attempt to explain how Cherenkov radiation "couldn't" be responsible, and it should therefore be reworded. If someone wants to take a shot at it, feel free; else I'll have a go myself. Magic9mushroom (talk) 14:39, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Blue flash section needs a rewrite 

message: Tōkai incident: 'not designed to dissolve this type of solution' reads oddly to me.  Isn't it solids that are dissolved not solutions? 109.158.118.221 (talk) 13:27, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusion 

message: For a bomb, with the neutron mean-free-path about the size of the fissioning sphere, it might be that one number is about right. But in the case of reactors, reactivity can, and does, vary throughout the reactor. This is one of the design complications of the RBMK. Operators had to work hard to keep reactivity close to 1 throughout the reactor.  But then the article says: "accumulates in a small volume". The size of such volume depends on the mean free path of neutrons, so the volume can't be too small. Gah4 (talk) 03:45, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  scale 

message: There are contradicting numbers of deaths in article: 14 fatalities in the lead, 21 in known incidents summary and 23 listed total in the incident table fatalities column. MKFI (talk) 19:44, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I've had a go at fixing this, although I'm really not an expert in the field.  Most of the numbers seem to come from the McLaughlin et al report published in 1999, but the table also includes a nuclear submarine incident (Vladivostok 1985) not included in that report.  21 is the number synthesised from two different parts of the report, whereas the 23 fatalities in the table represent a subset of the report plus the submarine, so I think the "true" number is over 30.  I can't figure out where 14 might have come from.  And I'm sceptical of the implication that there have been no criticality incidents in the 21st century, but I'll let someone with more expertise address that one.  Jowa fan (talk) 23:29, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Chernobyl is also not included, because that was promt criticality. I suppose people just do not play with U anymore to get this. Valery Zapolodov (talk) 01:29, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradicting number of deaths
Talk:Voodoo Glow Skulls

message: I added an info box but it needs some more details added.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Buck09 (talk • contribs) 22:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  InfoBox 

message: can we get an accurate listing of band members over the years?  i can't seem to find one anywhere. Chud50 05:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Band Members

message: Someone threw a line about band members' religious views in the Hickey Controversy section. Poorly formatted and unsubstantiated. Delete, yes? McFlynnTHM 16:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion? 

message: I fixed some casing, some wording and removed the VGS acronym and put in the long version to make the article consistent cheers, Rebecca 210.54.6.17 (talk) 01:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casing etc