lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Vanderbilt Mansion National Historic Site

message: If anyone has time, this article can be greatly expanded. There are a number of good resources, including this comprehensive publication:
* https://archive.org/details/vanderbiltmansio97snel (should be PD)
And PD images:
*Photographs and architectural sketches of the Vanderbilt Mansion
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
--ɱ (talk) · vbm  · coi) 21:47, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Resources
Talk:Mohammad Reza Golzar

message: hello i want to join you be cause i wanna to see him (mohammadreza golzar) very much but i cannot unfortauntly —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.217.37.175 (talk) 19:42, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  sedayeh manoo beshnoo man doostat daram 

message: hello how are you my name is narges and atefeh and JASMINE.
I wanted to know you do you like mahnaz afshar.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.71.34.208 (talk) 21:19, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  talking 

message: salam reza jon man roozbeh hastam{roozbeh shiraz}.
omed varam man ro be yad beyari,khaterate ghashangi ro ke ba ham dashtem hech faght faramosh namekonam.
reza jan man alan be modate 2 saal mesha ke ba leila dar engelestan zendagi mekonim va harchi ba telephne ghablet tamas megeram khamosh hast age metoni lotfan be email man site ya shomarato bezar ta be tonam peydat konam va age vaght dashte bashe beyay enja ta betonam zahmatato jobran konam.
email man hast    roozbeh.leila@googlemail.com     roozbeh_leila@yahoo.com
azizam khaile khoshhal mesham ke mojadadan betonam babenamet.
barat behtarenharo arezo mekonam.
take care    byeeee  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.12.167.122 (talk) 15:49, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  salam 
Talk:Weir Farm National Historical Park

message: There are two NRHP reference numbers for Weir properties.
First reference number 03000284 gives no useful files, not digitized message at that. and Accompanying ____ photos, exterior and interior, from 19___
This is verified by searching at NPS Focus;  there is no online doc available.
Number of contributing buildings: 6
Number of contributing sites: 2
Other names: Weir,J. Alden Farm; National Historic Site
Second reference number, 84000825, has stuff. and Accompanying 11 photos, including scenes painted by Weir, from 1982 and 1983
References
:Category:National Register of Historic Places in Connecticut
:Category:Fairfield County, Connecticut
:Category:Houses on the National Register of Historic Places in Connecticut
:Category:1800 architecture
So to develop the article properly and describe the two NRHP listings, it is necessary to request and obtain a copy of the other NRHP listing document.  Perhaps there was a boundary change at the later date, besides the fact of National Historic Site designation. doncram (talk) 16:02, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weir sites stuff for article maybe
Talk:George Snowden

message: PlainJane 09:04, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

message: :Done! I changed it to "George Snowden" because I thought that it would make the article easier to find than "'Shorty' George Snowden". However, we probably do need a redirect on that article title. --Cswrye 18:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: A newspaper article in the New York World dated June 20, 1928 refers to Snowden and Parnell performing a "new dance called the 'Lindberg Hop.'" Therefore, the assertion in the current article that "The term ‘Lindy Hop’ in connection with Snowden and Purnell’s invention was used for the first time in public in September 1928," is misleading. A.T.S. in Texas (talk) 16:52, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Naming of the Lindy Hop
Talk:Manassas National Battlefield Park

message: Does anyone know where the picture with the Cannon is from? I at first thought it was Jackson's line in Henry Hill, but the angle in the left flank is not correct. I haven't been on the battlefield of 2nd Manassas, but it doesn't appear to be Matthew's or Henry Hill. --Daysleeper47 (talk) 16:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Cannon picture
Talk:Gettysburg National Cemetery

message: I found an article at a site that is blacklisted on Wikipedia (associatedcontent dot com). The article can be found by searching for its title, "The Forgotten: Confederate Soldiers Who Died at Gettysburg" on the Internet. It contains interesting information, some of which seems well sourced. However references to the specific people who were instrumental in transferring the remains does not seem to be sourced. If sources can be found, I think this information would be a good addition to this article. Krellkraver (talk) 13:12, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Detailed History of Transfer of Remains of Confederate Fallen

message: I wanted to remove the spaces on either side of the quoted title that appears in the Reference section, number 28. But as you can see below with copy and paste, they are actually tiny, tiny little pixel-sized dots. Highlight by right clicking if you can't see them. They don't show up in the edit window, so I don't know how to effect a correction. 
 28. ^ a b "﻿Gettysburg National Military Park Tour Roads﻿". Historic American Engineering Record 
 (HAER No. PA-485). date tbd. Retrieved 2012-03-22.
Thank you, Wordreader (talk) 18:31, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tried to fix typo, but unable to do so

message: First and foremost, I noticed that this article is really... well, jumbled. If its ok, i'd like to start an update, most specifically the references. The ref list is not to wiki standard and the cites should be placed in the article and not separated at the bottom. There's a lot of missing data. This is the kind of work I enjoy and would love the chance to do. Also, is it ok to swap out the Geobox for the NHRP and cemetery infoboxes or whichever may be appropriate. Appreciate any feedback.  I'll start the cleanup as soon as possible but wait on the boxes until I get some idea on what to use. Thanks! FriarTuck1981 (talk) 08:40, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Major update/Infoxbox change

message: Articles on cemeteries often include a section listing "notable burials." I certainly would not argue that all of the dead from the Battle of Gettysburg are, in a sense, notable. But would it be appropriate to nonetheless mention a few specific burials? For instance... George Nixon (the great-grandfather of the President) and Amos Humiston? PurpleChez (talk) 16:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable burials
Talk:Pea Ridge National Military Park

message: I came to notice the lack of information on the article about the Cherokee Indians' involvement, and courage in the battle of Pea Ridge. One cavalry fought for the Confederacy (the Confederate Cherokee) from Indian Territory or present-day Oklahoma and the Union Cherokee from Central Missouri. Pea Ridge was said to been the eastern boundary of the historic Western Cherokee Nation, but the reservation boundary was changed and moved westward after the US Civil War. An estimated 200 Confederate Cherokee and 100 Union Cherokee troops engaged in the battle of Pea Ridge, but the Union triumphed over what most Cherokee in Oklahoma also felt was a "lost cause" of their tribal sovereignity until statehood in 1907. + 71.102.10.169 (talk) 06:58, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Information on Cherokee Cavalry units? 

message: The following outline is my proposal to improve this article.  Note, much of the specific should be in separate articles, especially those which refer to individuals.  But the basic roles and actions need to be here with links to the more detailed information.  A specific item should not be considered done until the links that are necessary are populated.  Feel free to change and alter this proposed outline to better reflect the information that should be included. Chris Light (talk) 14:13, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  To Improve the Article
Talk:Wilson's Creek National Battlefield

message: There's something of a disconnect between this article and the Battle of Wilson's Creek. The battle page declares a Missouri/Confederate victory, while this page declares it a "Confederate failure". Well, which is it? I think the reality is close to the disconnect, in that the battle was a tactical Confederate victory that the Confederates failed to capitalize into a greater strategic success. Something like the linked article says:
"Although a Southern victory, the Southerners failed to capitalize on their success." --Steelviper 18:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was actually going to comment on this very thing.  The Battle itself was indeed won by the Confederate army.  They just failed to properly hold the region because they evacuated the city after they captured it. I vote we change the wording to make this clear.  Theroguex (talk) 05:05, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Confederate Failure

message: Apparently almost the entire section about the battlefield today was copied almost word-for-word from the various sources.  I've tried to rewrite to eliminate the COPYVIO, but if I missed something, please either fix the issue yourself or ping me.  Thanks. Hog Farm (talk) 03:50, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: COPYVIO
Talk:The Stoned Age

message: Reads like it was written by one of the characters. 75.76.65.246 (talk) 05:51, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Style
Talk:Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area

message: Proposal to merge Big South Fork of the Cumberland River into Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area: no reason given? Doesn't make sense to me as the river is not the recreation area and vice versa, even if closely related. Wouldn't it look odd to have a recreation area page in a list of Kentucky rivers, for example? Which infobox would be used, the river one or the protected area one? Pfly (talk) 17:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree: the two articles should remain separate. One is about the river, and the other is a about a National Park Service site. I suppose the name Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area makes it sound like the NPS area includes just the river, but that's not the case. --Orlady (talk) 18:00, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm against the merger, mainly for reasons already stated (one is a geological entity and one is a political entity).  Standard practice seems to be to separate the two, for example Mount Hood and Mount Hood National Forest, Guadalupe Mountains and Guadalupe Mountains National Park, Everglades and Everglades National Park.  Bms4880 (talk) 17:58, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal 
Talk:Curecanti National Recreation Area

message: If this is in Colorado, why does the map point to a location in New Mexico?  Hmains 02:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  map 

message: I recently traveled through this area, and I took a 'better' (at least clearer) pic of the pinnacles... can I replace the existing pic?  I am also planning a redirect for the name. Qfl247 (talk) 01:43, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Dillon Pinnacles]]
Talk:Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area

message: This article claims the Delaware River as the longest undammed river.  This claim is also made by the Yellowstone River (I think this is the actual longest), and the Salmon River.  Anyone have a reference? Nationalparks 19:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That claim seems to have been added by an unregistered user with only a few edits and it is most certainly false. I was also under the impression that the Yellowstone was the longest undammed river. The Delaware River article does not make such a claim. Based on a little research, the consensus seems to be that the Delaware is the longest undammed river east of the Mississippi River. As far as a good source for this, there are several websites that make this claim. How reputable they are I don't know. NPS.gov probably has something but that site seems to be down at the moment. --Nebular110 19:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Longest Undammed River

message: I am looking for the Delaware Water Gap Jazz Festival, which I haven't found in this article. If anyone knows anything about it in Wikipedia I'd like to at least wiki-link it to an article in which the Dave Matthews Band has performed at an event with that name. Please leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 22:51, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: It is under its official name Celebration of the Arts Festival Ruhrfisch  ><>°° 23:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Question 

message: I noticed this page was added to some "established in 1965" categories.  While the lands may have been bought up by the Army Corps in 1965, the recreation area was not established until 1978.  Wouldn't that be a more appropriate year for said categories? Famartin (talk) 00:27, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Established 1965???
Talk:Gateway National Recreation Area

message: The article provides background on the history and structure of Gateway National Recreation Area in New York City.  One fact that is lacking in the current article is the difference between a National Park and a National Recreation Area.  In light of the fact that there are so few National Recreation Areas, these details would be helpful.  The article does not appear to have been recently updated, and discussion of Shirley Chisholm State Park, one of the newest additions to the Jamaica Bay Unit, has not been updated since 2019.  A few of the details in this section of the article are lacking citations.  Coverage of the Staten Island and Sandy Hook Units of the National Recreation Area are superficial, and could also benefit from updating and expanding. Brooklynbiology (talk) 15:52, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article Evaluation / Suggestions for Improvement 

message: The NYC Open Data site 
 defines the Community District Tabulation Area (CDTA) of SI95 with the following areas: Fort Wadsworth, Great Kills Park,
Hoffman & Swinburne Islands, and Miller Field.
I propose adding this map to the section on Staten Island Unit. Comments? - DutchTreat (talk) 11:07, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Support -  Wil540 art (talk) 15:48, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Map added to article - DutchTreat (talk) 12:45, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map Staten Island Unit from NYC Open Data
Talk:Wynyard, Tasmania

message: The article seems to contain some bias towards the tarkine.
Although the tarkine is near wynyard it is not one of the towns features and this information should be moved to the section on tasmania. I would suggest someone remove this and move it to a relevant section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.169.153.93 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 26 March 2006
agreed  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.53.251.2 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 22 November 2006
Also agree with both of these comments and the changes made by 144.53.251.2 -- Chuq 07:04, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Those items are listed as being near Hobart because Hobart is the only major settlement in the south-east of the state (where the other items in the list are located).  Also note that they are only included in items in a list and does not go into detail on any of them.  There isn't really anything that would be more accurately described as being "near Wynyard" than being "near Burnie" or simply "on the north-west coast" or "north-west Tasmania".  This is an encyclopedia, not a tourist guide.  (Also note that I have removed your phone number from your post, for privacy reasons). -- Chuq 07:34, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: earlier comments re tarkine

message: The latest additions to the article are useful and informative but they are unsourced and not written from a neutral point of view.  Wikipedia is not a tourist guide and articles should be written in an encyclopaedic tone.  Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk
:About 8 years later, this issue is now fixed. Regards,  NeoGeneric 💬  12:02, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent additions
Talk:2nd Battalion, 8th Marines

message: I got the chance to serve briefly with 2/8 in Iraq, as OPCON security to one of their attachments. If I can find my references, I'll add in where they were stationed in Iraq: I want to say it was Camp Virginia and Camp North Carolina, but I can't remember for certain. ⇒ SWATJester  Ready  Aim  Fire! 09:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments 

message: The Wikipedia article lists the 2/8 move to Lebanon as 1953.  Actually, the Battalion was on standby status at Camp Lejeune and flew into Lebanon from Cherry Point in 1958. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.40.139.148 (talk) 00:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lebanon deployment 
Talk:Canaveral National Seashore

message: ----
Need date to replace current January 99, 1975 --68.35.207.220 23:43, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

message: There's a nice map of the park on the NPS website. It should be in the public domain since it's a government publication. The image is rendered in a javascript window, but it could be screengrabbed (or, more painstakingly, assembled tile-by-tile via the image URLs). Anyway, if someone wanted to do that it'd be a nice addition to the wiki page. I would, but I'm at work and shouldn't even be writing this right now.  --JustDerek (talk) 07:53, 26 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: This is clearly more than a stub article.  However, it needs to be broken into sections for better organization.  Also, I don't think the line about when it celebrated its 25th anniversary matters - take it out.  Also, it reads like it was taken from some old brochure or something.  Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:49, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Article improvements
Talk:The Firm (novel)

message: I'm going to add a list of characters. Is it okay for everybody?The Hegemarch (talk) 13:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  List of characters 

message: I'm pretty sure it was only $9. If I recall correctly, the FBI only paid Mitch $1 million, and of the $10 million that Mitch stole from the Mafia, $1 million of it went to Tammy, and another $1 million went to Abbey's parents. (Mitch also wired $7 million of the $10 million he stole to a bank in Zurich, but I assume that that was for him to use later.) Will wait on changing it to $9 million to hear from others on this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.168.82.252 (talk) 00:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  They escape with $12 million? 

message: The article states that privilege does not apply "where a lawyer knows that a crime is taking place". In the book Mitch is a new associate and only assigned "clean work" i.e. files of legit clients of which The Firm has lots. He knows he is giving clean files in exchange for $1 million so the FBI knows he is serious that he is now on the hook with them. Mitch doesn't appear to know "a crime is taking place" except that the FBI is telling him, that they have no proof they show him. So I wonder?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.245.225.131 (talk) 16:34, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attorney-client privilege 
Talk:Rough (manga)

message: I added a section on the film as well as adding the film infobox. If anyone can find other sources for the film information, feel free to add it. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 07:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Live action film
Talk:A Fine Night for Dying

message: The plot summary looks like somebody just copied the back cover blurb, especially in its style.  Could it be replaced by somebody who's read the book with an actual summary? -- 71.76.237.208 (talk) 21:13, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is that the back cover blurb I see?
Talk:New River Gorge National Park and Preserve

message: The links to specific whitewater rafting companies that were added to this article appear to violate Wikipedia's external links guidelines, which strongly discourage advertising and linking to commercial sites on Wikipedia pages. I'll remove that section in a few days unless someone has a compelling reason why they should be included in the article that I'm overlooking. Thank you. 'Card 20:22, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertising Links? 

message: Why are we not featuring the New River Gorge Bridge more prominently in the article for the national park? It is undoubtedly the most iconic landmark for the area. Of course there’s plenty more within the park, but I think the bridge should be featured here with photo(s). 71.161.96.181 (talk) 04:17, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  NRG Bridge? 

message: The language of this page is extremely editorial and literary in nature, reflecting subjectivity, rather than objectivity. It should be updated. It reads like a national park brochure rather than an encyclopedia entry. Kakasprincess (talk) 16:50, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language
Talk:Ebey's Landing National Historical Reserve

message: The two pages should be merged because the actaul name of the reserve is Ebey's Landing National Historic Reserve and both pages are short and could be easily incorperated.Upfoamer 19:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and done. Nationalparks 19:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Brothers (Goldman novel)

message: The reliable sources don't show all of the plot details, but after reading much of the novel I found this review does state: http://jasondeanbooks.blogspot.com/2013/08/great-forgotten-thrillers-brothers-by.html
* The British boys die in an explosion
* The boxer and his girlfriend do the sexual requests 
* The basketball player and his gf kill themselves
WhisperToMe (talk) 18:48, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plot stuff 

message: In: Murray, Shirley K. (1987-02-22). "Brothers by William Goldman". The Courier-Journal. p. 115.
Murray stated Scylla was shot in Marathon Man when he had been stabbed.
WhisperToMe (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mistakes
Talk:The Devil's Alternative

message: // He informs Munro that Valentina (implied to be Rudin's own daughter) is genuinely fond of him, but not so romantically attached to abandon her homeland for him.//
Can some one explain how it is implied that she is his own daughter  Doctor Bruno  08:21, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Valentina is Rudin's Daughter ?
Talk:The Odessa File

message: I have added "spoiler zone" because it reveals much of the plot.
:You didn't need to, however. It is not WP policy, both because WP is an encyclopedia and because the PLOT header or similar headers are enough for people to grasp that spoilers are present. Wurdnurd (talk) 23:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spoilers

message: In the last paragrpah in the article, the link to "List of SS Personnel" goes to a list that does not seem to include Roschmann. At least I didn't see it....In fact, the link has a chart of various names grouped by rank, which is poorly laid out and inefficient to wade through if you are looking for a particular person only by name....In any event, it has no particular relevance to the Wiki article on Roschman....Engr105th 13:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was moved. No objections received. -- PeterSymonds (talk) 09:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Link to "List of SS Personnel" (last paragraph)
Talk:The President Vanishes

message: I deleted
:"The President wants to preserve his sole right, under the US Constitution, to declare war, and denies he is a pacifist."
as factually inaccurate. Under Article One, "Congress shall declare war, the President shall wage it." How did this slip past...?  Trekphiler  14:40, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The Constitution vanishes