lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Jim Power: The Lost Dimension in 3-D

message: As far as I've been able to tell "The Lost Dimension in 3-D" subtitle only applies to the SNES version of the game. Furthermore this seems to be the only version that supports the Anaglyph 3-D Glasses. Other versions of the game are simply titled Jim Power (already a seperate page) or Jim Power: The Arcade Game in the case of the Genesis version. I bascially made the same mistakes when I added it to MobyGames (Jim Power) and had to go back and fix things --WildKard 01:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The PC version is also "Jim Power: The Lost Dimension in 3-D" rather than the original "Jim Power in Mutant Planet", so this platform shifts to this article. I don't know why the PC was referenced in the "Mutant Planet" article instead of in this one, and other websites like MobyGames do the same thing too, obviously because of people who never actually played the PC version. A referente to "Jim Power: The Arcade Game" for the Mega Drive/Genesis (which is an unpublished game) should also be in this article since that one is way more similar to "The Lost Dimension in 3-D" than actually is to "Mutant Planet", so I'm bringing that one also. (Mr Wesker (talk) 02:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  3-D Glasses Support 
Talk:Nonylphenol

message: Thanks for the reviews, guys! We added a ton more wikilinks and found a few more sources, as well. We agreed on the need for information about bioaccumulation, so we added a few sentences about this in both the environmental and human health sections. Additionally, we added a bit about the breakdown/metabolism of NP, as suggested. We also added more in the policy section. We also added more about associations with NP exposure and breast cancer. Finally, we changed the layout of the article for clarity. Thanks for the suggestions!
OliviaHall10 (talk) 01:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Review of Article 

message: This article misses "see also" WP:ALSO and "external links" Wikipedia:External links.--Wuerzele (talk) 02:38, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  missing sections and comment on references 

message: This was a very informative article! However, I have a few suggestions:
- I would, if possible, expand upon the cancer section. Do nonylphenols only cause breast cancer or are people at risk for other reproductive tract cancers as well? 
- I would possibly move the Human Exposure Section further towards the top. I think it should also be its own major section as it is very important. People want to know how this chemical affects them, how they will come into contact with nonylphenols, and how to avoid them. 
- How do nonylphenols affect fish? Does it kill them or affect their reproduction in any way? 
I really liked your Regulations section as it gave examples of how the government is working towards decreasing the amount of nonylphenols in the atmosphere and leaves the reader with a sense of hope. 
Sej942 (talk) 02:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Concerning your second point: Do you know Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Chemistry/Chemicals? --Leyo 10:06, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

text: Furthermore, please aim for WP:SECONDARY, i.e. cite books and reviews, steering away from websites and primary journals. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:15, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Additional Suggestions

message: Is this representation correct? It does not match that on PubChem (https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/4-nonylphenol). I took the SMILES string from the wiki article and used it with ToxTree and OECD QSAR. Both returned the PubChem version.
213.253.35.226 (talk) 15:19, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  2D structure
Talk:Hmong–Mien languages

message: Early on I have asked linguists to define similarity between languages spoken by the Hmong and Mien; I have yet to recieve any answers, respectively. Characteristics defined here are "high-tones" and "monosyllabic" which goes for most East Asian languages. I hope this classification was not made based on recent socio-economic relations between the two groups. I believe both languages are distinct and I have not found/read any research to justify them related. 
History behind the creation of this classification is appreciated.
:From everything I've heard, these languages are transparently related. There's no controversy at all. I'm reverting your edit until you can back up your objections. kwami 09:56, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I never said they were. I said that HM may be the source of tone. Tone can be passed from language to language; that doesn't mean the languages themselves are related. Old Chinese was not a tonal language, nor was Vietic. That leaves HM and Kradai. If Kradai descended from Austronesian, as some maintain, then it wasn't originally tonal either. That leaves either HM or some other family that has since gone extinct. kwami 07:15, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Similarity

message: *The history section appears to be a mix of original research & un-verified claims. What constitutes "Han Chinese" during the Zhou Dynasty? Linking ethnicity from such ancient times is a fun exercise, but extremely difficult to support, even with good evidence. It's a bit of a stretch to go from plausible linguistics theories to determination of ethnic identity. This line: "Chinese legend portrays Hmong-Mien people as being one of the founders of China" is also rather dubious, and not verified. Most serious archaeologists do not claim any sort of "Chineseness" for Pengtoushan, which was definitely not a city--Confuzion 05:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: History

message: About what year did the Hmong-Mien languages come to be considered a separate language family from Sino-Tibetan languages? Keraunos (talk) 22:32, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: suggests that Paul K. Benedict in 1942 was the first to separate Hmong–Mien from Sino-Tibetan (although German Wikipedia mentions that Conrady excluded Hmong–Mien already in 1896). So I think you can say the tendency to view Hmong–Mien as a separate family, at least among Western scholars, started in the 1940s, even though it probably took its time to become more widespread. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 19:20, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Chronology of classification

message: How many Wikipedia in this languages?--Kaiyr (talk) 11:33, 22 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Only in incubator. No officially launched Wikipedias are in either Hmong or Mien. Lingnanhua (talk) 11:08, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia
Talk:Rydberg–Ritz combination principle

message: What is a 'transition line' of an atom? please be more helpful here. wikipedia points nowhere.
: I have added a section explaining and linking to other articles.  This helps explain the atomic spectra for non-scientists.  I am also going to casually suggest a merge with the Ritz Method.
* These articles describe roughly the same theory
* They provide two different levels of mathematical and conceptual rigor that could greatly complement each other if combined into one article
* The extremely incomprehensible Ritz method article could use the conceptual introduction provided by the Rydberg-Ritz combination Principle article
* This one could use the mathematical approach as a good follow-up for more advanced physics or chemistry students who want additional information.  Nimur 13:59, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page content formerly with no section title

message: For me, this article simply doesn't make it clear enough what Ritz contributed beyond the Rydberg starting point, at the level of an equation. I sort of get it that he extended the set of lines with sums and differences of two Rydberg lines (only two, or do the new Ritz lines also participate in summing/differencing, making available every linear combination, if perhaps with exponential decrease in emission intensity/probability?) 
And why did this wait until later? Are the Ritz lines inherently weaker, and therefore largely unnoticed, for a long time? — MaxEnt 17:09, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: This is answered in the History section. Rydberg considered only the hydrogen atom. Ritz generalized the principle to apply to all atoms. Dirac66 (talk) 18:34, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not sufficiently explanatory
Talk:Sylvia Tyson

message: Started the article. This is really only the beginning, she's such a cultural icon, I don't even know if what I've covered is the most important stuff about her, and undoubtedly a lot more could be added. Things to expand upon:
*Style & Influences
*More about her compositions, including maybe a list of artists who have covered her music (it's a long and distinguished list)
*Discography, list of singles, etc
*More in-depth bio (any other children? significant other?)
*Her influence on the Canadian music scene, both through her music and her organisational efforts/public role
*Other awards
*Quotes
*Citations/sources
I'm not going to, because I know almost nothing about her and I'm a lazy, lazy woman. ;-)) --Anchoress 08:52, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Zugot

message: The following conroversial passage inserted by User:Shirahadasha is now placed here (has anyone heard of this? It is not universal in the world of Halakha experts and Talmudic scholars): 
:"The medieval commentators' various approaches to Zugot are sometimes used in a contemporary setting as an example of the way that traditional commentators have explained and justified evolution in halakha (Jewish law) based on changes in surrounding societal beliefs and sociological conditions.
It requires further discussion before becoming part of the definitive term "zugot" IZAK 17:10, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Passage for discussion 

message: Is it necessarily true that there was "rule of the Jewish community by God through the High Priest" before the Hasmoneans, as stated in the article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pkandel (talk • contribs) 20:44, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Role of Kohen Gadol before the Hasmoneans 

message: I am always surprised to find wikipedia pages that use the religious delineations BC/AD (Before Christ/Anno Domini-Year of Our Lord) rather than the neutral BCE/CD (Before Common Era/Common Era).Aharon (talk) 20:30, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  BC/AD vs BCE/CE 

message: I removed the inaccurate statement concerning the absence of demons in the Jerusalem Talmud. I've seen this statement in other Jewish-demonology wiki pages and it needs to be corrected. While there is "comparatively little of sorcery, magic, astrology and other popular beliefs..." in the Jerusalem Talmud, "There are, however, in the Yerushalmi occasional references to shedim (i.e., demons, or spirits) as in Shabbat 1:3, 3b/36 and Gittin 6:6, 48b/8." ZELCER, H. (2002). A guide to the Jerusalem Talmud. New York, Universal Publishers. pp. 50, 51 fn51. Yonderboy (talk) 22:36, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demons in the Jerusalem Talmud
Talk:Robinson–Dadson curves

message: There are two significantly different graphs, with both the same labels on the axes and description. Shouldnt it explain somewhere what the difference is?
217.166.90.180 09:23, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: confused

message: Is there a good reason why this page doesn't rollup/redirect to "equal-loudness contour", the way "Fletcher-Munson curves" does currently? The language of this article is kind of redundant to the page for "equal-loudness contour"?
98.175.35.148 (talk) 19:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Does this page need to exist?

message: The one and only diagram in this article does not show the subject of the article but something else, which is confusing. The diagram only shows the Fletcher-Munson curves and the ISO curves revised in 2003, which replaced the Robinson-Dadson curves. In the versions of this article by 2011, there is a diagram depicting the Robinson-Dadson curves. However, its left scale has numbers printed above each other. I do not know how to remove or correct the overlapping numbers, but would like to suggest to use that diagram. 2A02:8109:B615:C500:3923:90A8:2473:F90 (talk) 11:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Diagram does not show Robinson–Dadson curves
Talk:FACTOR

message: Just started it to get rid of the red link that I created on the Sylvia Tyson page lol. Please feel free to expand/improve. --Anchoress 09:29, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Were very helpful but unfortunately they were word-for-word taken from the FACTOR website and others. Please re-work in different words and re-add this interesting info. Anchoress 18:24, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits
Talk:Lesbian erotica

message: I see that the article title was changed by consensus last year. I am the originator of the article and just wanted to comment on the choice of words in the original title. My thought was that "Lesbian erotica" implied erotica by and for lesbian women, whereas "Lesbianism in erotica" would be broader and would include depictions of lesbianism in erotica by lesbian women and also the broad genre where lesbianism is featured in erotica catering to heterosexual men. But really, the term "Lesbian erotica" could probably mean both and the change makes sense.
BTW, the choice of "erotica" was deliberate in that I wanted the article to be inclusive of historical art erotica and current pornography.
I will also point out that I probably went overboard on the bibliography section, placing it those references there as potential sources for the article's expansion. Iamcuriousblue (talk) 13:58, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Belated comment on article title and bibliography

message: The Majority of Pornographic Film Actresses in Mainstream Lesbian Pornography are straight and bisexual or pansexual respektively polysexual and this is the Major reason why Lesbian women critize Authenticity and Presentation of Mainstream Lesbian Pornography.--217.92.58.201 (talk) 14:22, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lesbian-for-pay in Adult Film Industry 

message: He seems to find it funny to replace the top image of this article (which is supposed to be a painting) with graphic pornography. 72.197.180.224 (talk) 00:21, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can someone ban Queensfence?
Talk:Isla de los Estados

message: Is this lighthouse on Isla de los Estados? It sems to me that it is near Ushuaia. Andres 09:57, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Correct. even though the 'Lighthose at the end of the world' IS on this island, that picture doesn't corresponds to it.  Mariano(t/c) 05:51, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I've done a copyedit, and clarified that the island, not the lighthouse, was a prison -- if I'm wrong, please correct this.  We could use more information on the prison (eg. what years did it operate), if available.  And thank you to the non-native English speakers who have taken the time to improve the English Wikipedia!  — Johan the Ghost seance 10:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, the lighthouse itself would be too small. I'm not sure about this, but I believe there's a complex next to the lighthouse, were the prison might have been settled. You're welcome, and excuse the English mistakes. Mariano(t/c) 11:09, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error photo 

message: Am I right in thinking that the name "Staten Island" has also been used for this island?  In fact it seems to have the same derivation as the Staten Island in NY.  In which case we should mention the fact. — Johan the Ghost seance 10:32, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I had no idea about the origin of the name of Staten Island, but yes, their names seam to have the same root. Yet I'm not sure if woth mentioning. Mariano(t/c) 11:09, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of the island 
Talk:Sarah MacKenzie

message: Noticed this page was a little light on info. Begun working on Bio section. Will return later --Stretch 10:03, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Her grandmother was Iranian.  She spoke Arabic and Farsi fluently.  She hated Islamic traditions concerning women.  She knew Islamic law well enough to defend a princess in one episode.--Will 05:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: IIRC, in another episode or two it's mentioned that she is also of Commanche heritage.  Both of these would be worth mentioning somewhere. --Raguleader 08:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on her Iranian ancestry are needed 

message: However, I could not match several items.  The closest I came is below.  Please note that I could have have Wikipedia treat these links as images without uploading them.  Where you are seeing an image, Wikipedia already had an image of the ribbon.  Other medal pages only showed the dress medal.
http://www.medals.lava.pl/us/r/us1mms.gif http://www.medals.lava.pl/us/r/us1machn.gif http://www.medals.lava.pl/us/r/us1mnds.gifhttp://www.medals.lava.pl/us/r/us2mcgwot.gif http://www.medals.lava.pl/us/r/us2mcgwotb.gif
#Meritorious Service Medal
#Navy Achievement Medal
#Combat Action Ribbon (N, MC, CG)
#Meritorious Unit Commendation (N, MC)
#National Defense Service Medal
#Overseas Service Ribbon (N, MC)
#Global War on Terror Service Commemorative Medal
#Global War On Terror Service Commemorative Medal
Will (Talk - contribs) 17:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is a Rackbuilder, with which you can construct Mag´s Ribbon Bar —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.144.120.59 (talk • contribs) 
Same website as that I already used.  I see no point in trying it.Will (Talk - contribs) 23:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I attemptted to use the site requested to build a ribbon rack 

message: While the new picture is somewhat better than the old one, I think we might as well try to find a *good* picture of Mac for this article.  Preferably one where she's not in the middle of some odd gesture or expression.--Raguleader 22:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article picture
Template talk:User grc-3

message: I don't want to annoy with pointless academical disputations, but I don't see why the four Byzantine instances of ἀνωτέρως should replace the five hundred and forty seven instances (TLG data) of a more consistent ἀνώτερον (as taught by many books, e.g. online Herbert Weir Smyth, A Greek Grammar for Colleges, §345). Did I miss anything or should I be bold and change it? --εΔω 10:03, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Spinothalamic tract

message: This is probably only a matter of semantics, but I believe that neurons in the Dorsal Root Ganglion are considered to be "Pseudounipolar" neurons not "Unipolar" neurons.
: An encyclopedia is a good place to be clear on matters of semantics. :-) I've corrected the article. In the future, feel free to do so yourself -- this is a wiki, after all! Cheers, David Iberri (talk) 23:25, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Pseudounipolar neurons

message: In the past 3 years, the Lateral and Anterior Spinothalamic tracts have merged to become the Anterolateral Spinothalamic Tract (ALS). This page should be updated to reflect this (Waysensei (talk) 18:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Anterolateral system

message: Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that the cell bodies of the STT are located in the substantia gelatinosa and the nucleus proprius? The STT is largely composed of these, secondary neurons, and not of the primary sensory neurons based in the DRGs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.79.78 (talk) 15:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Location of cell bodies

message: This article, as well as the one on the substantia gelatinosa, states that the first synapse of the spinothalamic tract occurs in the ipsilateral substantia gelatinosa (lamina II), and I have seen this elsewhere.  However, Blumenfeld in Neuroanatomy through Clinical Cases (2nd edition, p. 280) says this synapse occurs in the marginal zone (lamina I) or lamina V, with no mention of lamina II.  Can someone comment on this discrepancy? Aarongeller (talk) 14:03, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Location of First Synapse

message: Confusing, needless to have as a separate article. Would benefit readers by locating in its central article, giving more context, centralising information, and reducing confusing fragmentation. Tom (LT) (talk) 00:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 20:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Anterior spinothalamic tract]] 

message: As above Tom (LT) (talk) 00:23, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Klbrain (talk) 15:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Lateral spinothalamic tract]]
Talk:GM High Feature engine

message: Metric values are the world standard in engineering today, and all GM powerplants are made to metric specifications. Leave the old style(imperial) values in brackets.
:You deleted the "old-style" units.  I have re-inserted them.  The American versions of this engine are rated in horsepower natively, and using kilowatts for engine power unfamiliar to many.  There are accepted standards for Wikipedia units - see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Automobiles/Conventions if you would like to familiarize yourself with these.  Please consider site-wide standards before deciding to delete or change units.  --SFoskett 16:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

message: Are Ontario and Michigan countries now?
"This engine is produced in several locations, including St. Catharines (Ontario), Flint Engine South (Michigan), Melbourne (Australia), Ramos Arizpe (Mexico), and Suzuki (Japan)."
This appears to be written from a North American perspective, surely it should be continent neutral. 80.176.88.36 (talk) 15:47, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Country vs. region 

message: A very central distinction in engines is missing: is the valve timing via chain or belt? (It's probably not gear or other direct drive.)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.76.109.10 (talk) 19:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timing
Talk:Colorado State Highway 7

message: The routing of Highway 7 through the city of Boulder was changed in 2006.  Before then, Highway 7 ran south along Broadway to the center of old downtown Boulder, then east along Canyon Boulevard to 28th Street (concurrently with State Highway 119), then one block south along 28th, then east along Arapahoe Avenue.  After 2006, Highway 7 continues concurrently with US 36, from north of Boulder, along 28th Street (the northern part of this street being a southeasterly diagonal) all the way to the intersection with Arapahoe Avenue, then east.
After 2006, no part of Highway 7 ran along Broadway within the city of Boulder.
The text of the article has been updated, as has the table of road segments, but the map still shows the pre-2006 routing.  I would fix the map myself, but I do not know how to do this.  Someone please help. Paul (talk) 16:50, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Map corrected. Chinissai (talk) 21:41, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map needs correction
Talk:Westminster Academy

message: We might want to disambiguate this article because there is a school of some repute with the exact same name in South Florida: http://wacad.edu/  -- This previously unsigned comment was left by User:BHC on 04:28, 8 April 2006
:Agreed. I'll see to it. --Zantastik talk 00:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Disambiguation
Talk:LinuxTag

message: In need of editing, badly.  I'm taking a stab, but as I'm not involved with LinuxTag anymore (since their decision to demand admission fees), I'm not that qualified to keep it up to date.
Forgot to mention in the change note that I removed Karlsruhe as venue... 2006 is in the city of Wiesbaden.  Some history should be added.  And the most notable change, namely that it started to cost an admission fee from 2005 onward.jae 10:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The above note is outdated. I've started copy-editing, from the beginning through History/2001. Will continue by and by. Wegesrand (talk) 08:48, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

message: Should flip the image 90 degree clockwise. פרה (talk) 09:14, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  90 degree clockwise 

message: Its one of the biggest Linuxday in Germany, why is this missing?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowikiro (talk • contribs) 19:48, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chemnitz Linux Days are missing