lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Funny Girls

message: Why have the photos been removed? They're used here with permission! TR (talk) 17:16, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: CSD#I9, no evidence those photos are public domain other than your assertion. Given :Image:UKJUSTICE.jpg (which you uploaded) is also a blatant copyright violation that has been deleted from en and is awaiting deletion from Commons in addition, I tend to think we'll need more proof than your assertion that the images are PD. One Night In Hackney303 19:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos

message: I've just pulled the following shopping list from the article - it's noit very encyclopedic, nor particuarly relevant (if you're actually putting a show on there, you can ring the venue direct for the latest specs, just like any other venue!). It also reads like it's been copied in from an installation advert to be honest, not the sort of tone WP needs to be. --RedHillian 02:11, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: re Backstage Equipment
Talk:Air Italy (2018–2020)

message: Since Meridiana announced re-branding into Air Italy, should not the two pages be merged?http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/02/air-italy-expands-uae-backed-alitalia-bankrupts-180219134002547.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simpatico qa (talk • contribs) 19:37, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge with Meridiana 

message: Hi,
Meridiana Posted their press confrence on youtube they stated all the information which was added to the page. To See the video Visit https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TywhfgXxEeA for the offical press confrence.
Thank you!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by GUAE321 (talk • contribs) 17:43, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Press Conference Video 

message: :AirItaly →  – The airline name is NOT AirItaly it is Air Italy. CBG17 (talk) 19:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 March 2018 

message: Air Italy may have undergone a substantial reorganisation, including a merger with Meridiana, change of AOC number and airline codes, but is essentially the same airline that started in 2005. Having two (short) articles about it is just confusing. Several companies have gone through similar transformations, including changes of legal entity or even bankruptcy, but are still covered by a single article (Piper Aircraft springs to mind, or even General Motors). The history of Air Italy (and Meridiana) is indeed rather convoluted, but having two separate articles about it doesn't help. --Deeday-UK (talk) 22:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of [[Air Italy (2005–2018)]] into [[Air Italy]] 
Talk:Air One

message: There was another airline in the United States in the 1980's with the same name. Archtrain 17:32, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Air One, a different airline in the U.S.

message: * http://www.aironeexecutive.it
* http://www.aironeexecutive.it/images/flash_airone_fra.swf
* http://www.aironeexecutive.it/pag.php
* http://www.aironeexecutive.it/pag.php?lang=en
WhisperToMe (talk) 07:57, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: To archive
Talk:LGBT rights in Trinidad and Tobago

message: Per this edit - what's wrong with the graphic? It needs a better caption, but I think it's a net plus to the article. Guettarda (talk) 17:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's huge and pertains to the region, not to this particular country. If anywhere, it should go in a regional article. Aside from that, the graphic is prone to errors when even one country's legislation changes. History has shown that graphics like this do not get changed. They just stay wrong forever. Has anyone vetted this graphic to see if it is correct? AfricaTanz (talk) 18:01, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's large, but not that much larger than many of our other figures. So I don't see that argument. As for the accuracy, it's consistent with what we have in LGBT_rights_in_the_Americas - do you have any reason to believe that's inaccurate?With regards to the fact that it covers the region - why is that a problem? That's the standard way things tend to be portrayed - we're tiny islands, we share many regional institutions (Caricom, UWI, the West Indies cricket team).History says that all our articles turn into shit if we fail to maintain them. If it ends up out of date, then we can remove it. It's easy then. I'm looking for a reason why it should be removed now. Guettarda (talk) 18:14, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been removed because there is no consensus to have it. It dwarfs many of the articles we already have. Your assumption that these articles are not maintained is very mistaken. Otherwise, this graphic would not have come to my attention and I would not have dealt with it so rapidly. The presumption that the graphic is correct when we do not even know if the articles are correct is sadly misplaced. Cheers. AfricaTanz (talk) 18:29, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

text: Maybe you should create a regional article to deal with regional concerns. The way Wikipedia is structured, we have individual country articles that deal with individual country issues. AfricaTanz (talk) 22:00, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Legislation graphic 

message: I cracked open the PDF and sections 13 and 16 in there do not match sections 13 and 16 as quoted in the article. You'll have to fix the ref.
--LaserLegs (talk) 00:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Link to Sexual Offsenses act does not match quoted text
Talk:Fracture zone

message: Looks really good so far man. The only thing that's strikes my attention is the fact that your second illustration is a more informative version of the first illustration.  Would it be possible to make an illustration depicting the different methods of measuring relative spreading, such as showing magnetic striping offsets or having offset gradients to show relative seafloor age?Mcooper3 (talk) 03:41, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the suggestion, I changed the main picture of the article to an example of a fracture zone. Jkidd93 (talk) 05:49, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

text: Menard, 1953 and here are starting places. Announcement of his death in the NYT touches on his initial contact with the features. Palmeira (talk) 04:17, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

message: Mhunter2 has a good suggestion for the page. Also the transform fault figure is still wrong. the arrows on the fault (blue) is backwards. Mmdriskell (talk) 15:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits
Talk:Alpi Eagles

message: http://www.alpieagles.com/PDF/VACANZA%20CONTRATTUALE.pdf
WhisperToMe (talk) 18:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Documents

message: * Spanish: http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.alpieagles.com/?lang=ES
* Czech: http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.alpieagles.com/?lang=CS
* Greek: http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.alpieagles.com/?lang=EL
* Russian: http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.alpieagles.com/?lang=RU
WhisperToMe (talk) 19:43, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Languages needed
Talk:South Africa at the 1904 Summer Olympics

message: Since the Union of South Africa was not formed until 1910, what exactly was represented by this team?  Was it limited to the four colonies that eventually became the Union of South Africa, or did it also include Rhodesia, Bechuanaland, and other British colonies and protectorates in the area? --Jfruh (talk) 04:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You are right. Union of South Africa was formed only in 2010 and the SANOC was formed only in 1908 reuniting the 4 British colonies - not yet SAF - for participating to London 1908. In fact, these 8 « South Africans » were only extras of the Second Boer War. Historians think that this team was a Boer team, probably only from Transvaal colony, with the 2 first Black runners, both Tswanas, even if they were entered as « Zulus » and with incorrect names. Arorae (talk) 11:07, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What exactly was "South Africa?"
Talk:Cahuapanan languages

message: This pair of sentences makes no sense:
They include two languages, Chayahuita and Jebero, which are spoken by more than 11,300 people. Chayahuita is spoken by most of that number, but Jebero is almost extinct.
Huh? The first sentence suggests that each of these languages is spoken by more than 11,300 people. The second sentence seems to be saying that most of those people speak one of the languages, and just a few speak the other. Is that what they're trying to say? Whatever, they should both be reworded for clarity. If my understanding is right, maybe it should say this: The languages of this family are spoken by more than 11,300 people, but most of them speak Chayahuita. Jebero is nearly extinct. —MiguelMunoz (talk) 08:50, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Huh?
Talk:Pope's Eye

message: Are there no historians present? This rock fort was constructed so that Cerberus could sail in, sink herself to the turrets, and fire out through the heads with substantial protection from the rocks. The above ramble gives no hint of the purpose of the fort.~~  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lexysexy (talk • contribs) 11:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: HMVS Cerberus

message: The following changes have been made:
*Map caption – the feature is not actually located “off the coast” but within the nation’s internal waters – please refer https://www.ga.gov.au/products/servlet/controller?event=GEOCAT_DETAILS&catno=69821.  This change is also consistent with what is stated in the article.
*Designation is a field used for the name of a protected area which is used if the subject of the article is located within a protected area.
Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 08:50, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox upgrade, December 2017
Talk:List of Anglicans

message: I'd reconsider these too-broad lists...
It looks like this list - involving HUGE numbers of Anglicans - was started, worked on for a little while, and then abandoned. Obviously this list will never come close to even being 50% complete, so I ask: what is the point of even having this list when we have a catagory already? -- SECisek 09:50, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Why?

message: I just found this page and am unclear about the criteria. Is it only lay persons? No, the first name is Joseph Abbott (clergyman). But I notice Samuel Seabury isn't on it. He was a pretty prominent Anglican. What is the category we have already? I don't see one on Abbott, though Dean Acheson is listed under American Episcopalians. I propose creating :Category:Prominent Anglicans, making sure all these folks are on it (if they fit), and doing away with the list.   ~ InkQuill  04:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Lists allow for red-links and annotation. So far this list is not really doing either, but I think improvement is possible.--T. Anthony (talk) 13:12, 12 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: What?

message: "Only former Anglicans who left the church in adulthood may be included, with accompanying notice.": this appears to mean that Anglicans who remained in the same church would not be included. Was the idea "Former Anglicans who left the church in adulthood may be included only with accompanying notice."  ? The formulation of the lead seems difficult to understand.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 22:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity 
Talk:Lonely in Gorgeous

message: I removed the horribly-formatted lyrics and translation that were on the page. Wikipedia articles about pop songs don't generally seem to include a complete transcription of the lyrics, and I'd guess that it's a copyright violation (though I don't actually know Wikipedia's policy on the matter). Also, the "from the anime" lyrics underneath were just a transcription from the fansubs, which got the romaji totally wrong in the first few episodes. Including incorrect lyrics makes even -less- sense. Philip Reuben 04:34, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lyrics
Talk:Meridiana

message: There is a female demon called Meridiana. She is mentioned here, regarding a legend about pope Sylvester II. Should we create a new page for her? Tatoeba (talk) 23:23, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meridiana the demon? 

message: There is a female demon called Meridiana. She is mentioned here, regarding a legend about pope Sylvester II. Should we create a new page for her? Tatoeba (talk) 23:24, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meridiana the demon? 

message: http://www.meridiana.it/ru/index.htm is a Russian site about MeridianaFly. We should encourage the creation of an article in Russian. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:57, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian site

message: Isn't Naples a focus city for Meridiana Fly?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.82.82.176 (talk) 01:49, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naples
Talk:MiniLiner

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Moneytrees🏝️Talk/CCI guide  02:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:MyAir

message: Correction: Myair is in Torri di Quartesolo (Vicenza) --87.8.254.195 (talk) 18:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Baháʼí World Centre

message: this actually looks like an interesting article and could have something to add. I think the way it was added  was more WP:cherrypicking than WP:fringe theory. Selectively taking the quotes of interviewees talking about aggression did not reflect the opinions of the authors and was a deceptive attempt to add criticism, but the study of tensions with a growing place of pilgrimage and the local community could be worked into the article. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 04:17, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Instead of removing it, add it in a proper way. It is not some "fringe theory", it is published by a reputed journal and above the quote, it was clearly mentioned that Israeli researchers conducted interviews and they found...Serv181920 (talk) 07:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: In general, adding a section called "criticism" and taking selectively negative quotes is not good practice. It doesn't make a good article. Adding the article about tourism should include the main points in appropriate sections of the WP article. Maybe a new section called "Tensions with expansion" or "Expanding into Haifa". I've been wanting to make a summary of the article but the authors were not good writers and it will take some work to summarize correctly. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 17:29, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not the "only" negative quote in that paper. It has much more on that lines. There are some positive points as well, which I / you can add in the future.Serv181920 (talk) 10:46, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Understanding conflicts at religious-tourism sites 

message: There seems to have been a proliferation of pages related to the Baha'i World Centre. For example
*Baháʼí World Centre
*Baháʼí World Centre buildings
*Arc (Baháʼí)
*Baháʼí gardens
*Monument Gardens (Baháʼí World Centre)
*Terraces (Baháʼí)
*Pilgrim House
*Mansion of Bahjí
*Shrine of Baháʼu'lláh
*Shrine of the Báb
And maybe more out there I didn't catch.
I suggest consolidating into a few articles. The two main should be Baha'i World Centre for the administrative institutions (as a fork from Baha'i Administration), and Baháʼí World Centre buildings for the structures, terraces, arc, pilgrim house, and gardens (yes I know they're not buildings, but Baháʼí World Centre physical spaces just doesn't sound as good). I think Mansion of Bahji and the shrines could stay as stand-alone articles. Merge as necessary. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 21:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Just want to add my general support for this, it's about time that we consolidated a few of these articles. dragfyre_ʞןɐʇc 04:45, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  Support – Quality over quantity and the topics are closely related. Gazelle55 (talk) 20:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: These merges are all complete. Cuñado ☼ - Talk 23:23, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Consolidation of pages
Talk:Child Evangelism Fellowship

message: This submission appears to be an advertisement posted either by the organization or someone who otherwise supports the organization with the intent to promote the organization's agenda. The article is moderately informative, but also one-sided and lacking in depth and academic discourse.  Cajun gala 04:48, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's quite possible that all that is required for this subject is a moderately informative article. HokieRNB 13:07, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Sarah Churchill (actress)

message: Article was at "Sarah Churchill, Baroness Audley", so I've moved the page to include her married surname. She was only Baroness Audley as a result of her marriage to Tuchet-Jesson, and keeping her Churchill surname with her married title implies a life peerage, which she did not have PeterSymonds 15:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: The article states that Sarah Churchill's age at death, 67, was the "oldest age at death" of any of Winston Churchill's children. I realize that the statement may be correct for those of the children who have died, but since Mary Churchill Soames is still alive, so far as I know, and since she was born in 1922, the remark sounds odd.  Moreover, what precisely is the point of it?  To suggest that the Churchill children have somehow been cursed by early deaths, which curse is perhaps connected with the burden of their father's fame?68.72.108.82 (talk) 19:33, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Age at Death
Talk:C.A.I. Second

message: http://web.archive.org/web/20070113034926/buy.volareweb.com/jsp/en/web/administration/index.jsp
has the 2007 company info of Volare Airlines
WhisperToMe (talk) 15:49, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Company info
Talk:Mike's Place suicide bombing

message: There is a paragraph with the title “ISM visit controversy” but after reading it I am at a loss to understand what the controversy in all this is. I assume that the visit was indeed controversial or discussed in some way in relation to this bombing and in this case it obviously makes sense to mention it but the text should probably explain how. GL (talk) 15:30, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  ISM visit controversy 

message: Not labeling this terrorism is why we have things like this 
https://www.spectator.com.au/2023/11/wikipedia-at-war/
https://www.reddit.com/r/wikipedia/comments/17958bb/why_does_the_english_wikipedia_article_for_hamas/
since the us labels them terrorists as do all other non terrorists states, allegations of MOS:TERRORIST apply here just as much to September 11th and other areas that are just as explicitly labeled a terrorist attack.
I'm asking seriously what is the difference between this and September 11th?  
Since no one has ever explained that here, not labeling it as terrorism is a violation of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yestyest2000 (talk • contribs) 18:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Tagging @Ohnoitsjamie as an involved editor. TarnishedPathtalk 11:54, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

text: @Yestyest2000, please refer to MOS:TERRORIST. The passage I removed was especially egregious. TarnishedPathtalk 11:55, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  This was labeled terrorism for years until just now
Talk:Leco language

message: I have recently changed the language family according to Kaufman, Terrence. 2007. Atlas of the World's Languages, 2 edn., 69-70. London, New York: Routledge. However I believe there isn't consensus about this classification so if anybody would like to add their perspective, it'd be very welcomed. So far I found this:
Macro-Lekoan: Kaufman 2007
*Macro-Lekoan
**Sechura-Katakáoan
***Katakáoan
****Katakao
****Kolán
****Leko
***Sechura
Macro-Lekoan cluster: Campbell 1997
*Macro-Lekoan Cluster
**Sechura-Katakáoan
***Katakáoan
***Sechura
**Leko
And Ethnologue considers it a language isolate. Erebedhel  - Talk 01:32, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language family
Talk:Versailles wedding hall disaster

message: Was the building three stories or four stories high, and which level did the collapse occur on? The beginning of the article says it was a four-story building with the collapse on the third floor, but later on the article states that the building was only expanded to three stories. I've also found contemporary news reporting indicating the collapse occurred from the fourth floor. 174.20.111.61 (talk) 12:05, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many stories? 

message: "The effect of this error was somewhat mitigated by the construction of partitions on the floor below, which helped redistribute the excess load well such that no damage was incurred.   A few weeks before the collapse, the wedding hall owners decided to remove the partitions."
Wikipedia has no page with word "partition" with related meaning? Are we talking about permanent or non permanent structures? 
The owners removed load bearing walls and they were not changed, but inventor of the elements, that were misused in the constuction?
 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.137.75.12 (talk) 09:38, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Partitions?