Talk:Eclipse Public License

message: Section Later Versions specifically says "in my opinion" about something.
Fix, anyone?
Thanks. --Amir E. Aharoni 06:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  "In my opinion" 

message: It's clear that this was written in 2006, when version 2 was the latest version of the GPL. According to the FSF, the current version of the GPL is still incompatible with the EPL, but for a completely different reason (choice of law clause).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.28.14.219 (talk) 03:20, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outdated compatibility information 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eclipse Public License. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607225635/http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/e/eclipse-emf/eclipse-emf_2.5.0-1/eclipse-emf.copyright to http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/e/eclipse-emf/eclipse-emf_2.5.0-1/eclipse-emf.copyright
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The EPL 2.0 is now released. Here is the announcement.
* https://www.eclipse.org/org/press-release/20170829eplv2.php
FSF has not yet added it to its license list or released a statement.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshuagay (talk • contribs) 15:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: Here is the license text.  Am just about to update the infobox on the article proper.  With best wishes.  RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 15:11, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  This page now requires some work to explain the attributes of the new version2.0 license to readers.  RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 15:29, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  .  RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 10:20, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Version Published 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Eclipse Public License. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140429061958/http://www.opendaylight.org/resources/faq to http://www.opendaylight.org/resources/faq
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: In the Compatibility section is the following sentence:
"The EPL, however, requires that anyone distributing the work grant every recipient a license to any patents that they might hold that cover the modifications they have made."
There are two instances of the pronoun, "they" in that sentence, and it is not clear whether "they" refers to the distributor or the recipient.  Does anyone have clarification to offer or a suggested alternative wording?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.229.59.142 (talk) 14:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who is "they"? 

message: I don't edit in software / computer science wikipedia, so do go ahead and discard this idea if it doesn't make sense for a genre-specific reason I'm not seeing, but I wonder if this might be better off being trimmed significantly and merged into the article on the foundation itself? I assume this is a notable topic that could plausibly have its own standalone wp article, but there's been an "update" tag on this since 2015, so I'm not sure how useful this is to anyone. A cleaner description that's less likely to go out of date, with a link to further information on their own website, might be a more useful and stable long-term solution. -- asilvering (talk) 00:33, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trim and merge into [[Eclipse Foundation]]?