lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Starogradska muzika

message: Btw I've meant to ask it before, but somehow forgot. Do you have any idea what's the diff between Bulgarian "Stara Gradska Muzika" and this one? Cause "Biliana platno beleshe", for example, is considered a folk song in Bulgaria and not an "Old city/town",
For guy who constantly remove serbian part: Why do you do that? Starogradska muzika was popular and is still popular in Serbia, and it is not only Macedonian music. Keep in mind that central part of Belgrade, where over 100 taverns existed before World war I and where this type of music was performed, is called "Stari Grad"/"Old City". (За човека који стално уклања српски део: Зашто то радиш? Староградска музика је одувек била популарна у Србији, а не само у Македонији и није искључиво македонска музика. Имај на уму да се централна општина у Београду, где је пре Првог светског рата било преко 100 кафана и где се свирала ова музика, зове Стари Град).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bicca (talk • contribs) 06:33, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:Rock music in Switzerland

message: I removed both sections about the band Flame Dream. They read like a (very badly written) advertisement for this band, furthermore the discographies of this band have no place in an article about Swiss rock, as there is no place for the discographies of every Swiss rock band.
Below is the removed text: 130.92.9.56 (talk) 20:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Robert E. Lee Chadwick

message: This is a strange entry. Chadwick is a relatively minor figure in Mesoamerican archaeology, although he did publish a few significant papers, mainly on interpretations of the codices. Most of this entry consists of a list of papers that he wrote but never published. This puts him in a negative light, as someone who did research but never published the results. There is virtually no biographical information; perhaps there is a reason why he never published all these papers.
The list of unpublished papers is important for the history of Mesoamerican archaeology, but it is not an appropriate kind of list for Wikipedia. I would hesitate to remove it, however, unless the list is posted elsewhere on the internet. But given the small entries for some of the major Mesoamericanists (e.g., Kent Flannery, William Sanders), it is strange to have a long entry on Robert Chadwick.
Michael E. Smith (talk) 00:41, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Tecnocumbia

message: Agree: They're the same type of music, simply with a naming difference. In Peru the tecnocumbia tends to be labeled "Chicha music" along with the Andean cumbia ("chicha" being a reference to low-class populism). The terms "sound" or "tropical music" from Chile are also simply naming varieties, important to mention but not of widespread importance to title the article. Tecnocumbia is the best way to name these combined articles.--MarshalN20 | Talk 19:27, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger with "Sound"
Talk:KOTN (FM)

message: KAFN is not owned by Citadel.  I'm pretty sure the link to KARN is not correct - this station may have been a simulcast of KARN at one time.  My database showed the station as Silent with the FCC, but I can't find any current specific information.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 12:14, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The above observation stands.  This station was owned by Citadel at one time, but I can find no information to suggest that they are part of a KARN simulcast.StreamingRadioGuide (talk) 15:05, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Taiwan angelshark

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem
Talk:Taiwan saddled carpetshark

message: This article has been revised as part of the large-scale clean-up project of a massive copyright infringement on Wikipedia. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously.
For more information on this situation, which involved a single contributor liberally copying material from print and internet sources into several thousand articles, please see the two administrators' noticeboard discussions of the matter,  here and here, as well as the the cleanup task force subpage. Thank you.  --Geronimo20 (talk) 08:50, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem 

message: "Princeton University Press,123 Fake St. New Jersey"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.180.224.150 (talk) 21:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  references broken?
Talk:WAYA-FM

message: The FCC lists this station as being silent for more than two months beginning on 2007-04-08.
http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/status/silentFM.html
This list was last updated on 2008-02-19. - Dravecky (talk) 15:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Silent
Talk:Yamaha DGX-620

message: DGX-620 article states "also known as YPG-625". PamD 19:15, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been a year, I merged them. According to this site they are the same exact instrument, and according to pageview analysis this page gets more hits, so I brought YPG over here. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 21:32, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge with [[Yamaha YPG-625]]
Talk:Double bell euphonium

message: I removed information that was not needed ad added sections and a table of contents.
--Antonio Lopez  (talk)  04:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  edits 

message: Most people who've ever heard of this instrument have only done so because of its appearance in the song "Seventy-Six Trombones". Should we mention that somehow? Are there sources explicitly saying so? --Orange Mike | Talk 21:20, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  76 Trombones
Talk:3rd Space Operations Squadron

message: In addition to the merger, a disambiguation is called for at the from page Talk:3d Reconnaissance Squadron--Lineagegeek (talk) 22:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger
Talk:Klaxophone

message: The Klaxon was a brand of alarm/horn that went AAAOOOGAH.  I have been unable to find any video or audio or even pictures of Fillmore's original, but from what i saw of Albarn's, it was just a series of honks.  Like what seals used to play in the cartoons.  Shouldn't it be a series of AAAOOOGAHs to be really called a Klaxophone, seeing as "The Klaxophone is an instrument that makes use of the klaxon's unique sound." 24.145.60.38 (talk) 09:33, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it a horn or a Klaxon?
Talk:The Phenix Horns

message: The section Collaboration with Phil Collins is completely unsourced, and the last two paragraphs, if not true, would be defamatory (and as written, are highly POV).  I am deleting them, but feel free to reinstate (correcting POV issues) with appropriate sourcing. TJRC (talk) 00:25, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaboration with Phil Collins section 

message: The article should treat at least in passing the lawsuit between Collins's company and the players over overpayment of royalties for Serious Hits... Live.  It's the second Google hit for "Philip Collins Ltd".  121a0012 (talk) 23:29, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  ''Philip Collins Ltd v Davis and others'' 

message: Not a native speaker of English myself, I'm missing some explanation about the spelling of the name of the band. Why are there two ways to spell the name? Could anyone expand the article with a "Name" section, please? Thanks! Mark in wiki (talk) 13:49, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Just now I've noticed that an editor changed the name to "Phoenix" a few days ago, but without providing a source for the change. So the question: "Why are there two...?" may also be read as: "Are there two...?" Mark in wiki (talk) 14:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I haven't been able to find any reliable source that the Phenix Horns would have spelled their name as Phoenix Horns, ever. So I'm changing it back. Mark in wiki (talk) 08:05, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  OE or E?
Talk:Pignose

message: The Pignose returned to fame when it appeared in the film "Crossroads", staring a very young Ralph Machio. Loosely based on the Legendary deal that Robert Johnson signed at the crossroads with the devil, trading his soul in exchange for prodigious guitar skills and immortality as the greatest guitarist that ever lived.203.160.123.208 (talk) 02:57, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

message: I don't know, but they came out way before 2010 2607:FEA8:BC5D:700:9427:50A9:E233:7349 (talk) 11:22, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pignose portable guitars
Talk:MTR Metro Cammell EMU (AC)

message: Sorry I don't comprehend the meaning of {61組3卡(分別為E1-E45及E46-E61...)} even though I'm Chinese. The phrase is confusing and tricky and i think only the HK railway maniax will understand. ( an perplexed anon editor)
: From context I'd take it to mean "KCRC ordered the trains in 2 batches(E1-E45 and E46-E61) made up of 61 sub-batches each of three cars."
:Or in long hand: E-1 to E-45 constituting the first batch, E46-E61 constituting the second batch. E-1 is the serial number for a production group of three cars or carriages (i.e 卡), E-2 the serial second production group etc, so that from E-1 to E-61 there are 61 sub batches. You don't have to be a "HK railway maniax" to understand it, though I think being an anorak in general helps though. KTo288 (talk) 16:53, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hidden message
Talk:Seawind (band)

message: The following text exhibits bias toward the band and is a flagrent violation of neutral-point of view, thus is now been removed from the main articel:
Seawind is known for their extraordinary musicianship, brilliant songwriting and creative arranging. The group pioneered many of the musical elements that, years later, ultimately became the beginnings of smooth jazz. Seawind is regarded as one of the top jazz groups to come from Hawaii; and  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.115.47.138 (talk) 06:59, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutrality

message: When I saw Seawind the first time, they were at a music festival in Diamond Head (Leahi) Crater (July 1975) and they were calling themselves Ox. Then they opened for a Minnie Ripperton / Three Dog Night concert (yes, they toured together, but performed separately) at the HIC (honolulu international center, now Blaisdell Center) and I believe they were still calling themselves Ox. Shortly thereafter, they became Seawind.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.246.4 (talk) 07:40, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seawind 
Talk:Dekalb Academy of Technology and Environment

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources.  Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Trikekus (:3) 01:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Uni-Vibe

message: It could certainly use expansion. For instance, Unlike most other phaser pedals, this is achieved without the use of op-amps. Okay... but so what? If the point is introduced, some tiny effort should be expended to justify its inclusion or it's just a "gosh-wow" bit of trivia. In any case, I've linked to the Operational amplifier article.
Why does Shin-ei not yet have an article? A few of their effects are considered classic, like the Shin-ei Companion FY-2 (a really terrible article title, IMO).  Weeb Dingle (talk) 06:07, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: this article barely qualifies as a stub

message: The article says its a "phaser or phase shifter for creating chorus and vibrato simulations" although chorus and vibrato are quite distinct from each other and phase. The Uni-Vibe is quoted under both Phaser and Flanger as well as Leslie Speaker. My understanding is that it is a multiple phase-shift pedal and not a pitch modulator (chorus) or delay-shift (flanger) and was originally intended to simulate a Leslie speaker. Stub Mandrel (talk) 14:23, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  So exactly what effect is it? 

message: How much was the original Uni-Vibe? 2600:1700:4773:D010:6489:960B:601D:9FF2 (talk) 11:14, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Price?
Talk:Yamaha MM6

message: "Legendary" is a quite subjective word to use about a sound bank, praised as it may be. -- -- PC-72 (talk) 11:41, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

message: Hello. I saw the current state of the article was in terribly bad shape, so I decided to rewrite it from scratch.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.68.156.21 (talk) 20:33, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite
Talk:Jay M. Cohen

message: Can anyone find the date he left office?  It was presumably 2009, when the new administration came in, but I'm unable to confirm that.  Clearly in was prior to May 6, 2009, when O'Toole's nomination was transmitted to the Senate, with the notation "vice Jay M. Cohen, resigned." (). TJRC (talk) 21:14, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date leaving office
Talk:Chantilly Codex

message: I thought I might explain exactly what I think can be accomplished by tagging this article for expansion from its French counterpart. It seems to me (in my limited grasp of French) that l'article français gives a much better explanation of the context, influence, and content of the Chantilly Codex. I particularly like the table of compositions, but perhaps that is beyond the reasonable scope of our English article. Timmietimtim314 (talk) 03:54, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Translation from French
Talk:The Temple News

message: The citations for Joby Warrick and Steve Capus do both mention their being alumni. Warrick's citation calls him alumni in the article's headline!! Capus's comes in the second page of the article. thank you.
Cgwink 03:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies, I didn't notice there was a second page to the article. —Hello, Control Hello, Tony 10:23, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments
Talk:Engelberg Codex

message: I'm quite surprised that one of the most important (and inherently notable) manuscripts in the world has an unreferenced stub. I haven't checked yet, but I suspect that the article on the German language Wiki has quite a bit more content. I'll be working on this, as time and inclination allows, but any help would be appeciated! Quinto Simmaco (talk) 05:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Grimace (composer)

message: This is such a great article; head and shoulders above any other encyclopedia article on the composer. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 07:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you!! Aza24 (talk) 21:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article, yes!
Talk:Ligature (music)

message: I just completed an overhaul of this whole article.  No information was summarily deleted; everything in the original was either corrected or elaborated upon, and I cited several references to make sure that we can help this article on the road to recovery.  I created a diagram for ligatures, uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons and linked it here.  Since this has to do with the middle ages, I am including this int he WikiProject Middle Ages; since this is pretty specialized within that context, I am assigning it a low importance.  Lioux (talk) 02:25, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Overhaul
Talk:1997 World Championships in Athletics

message: Why is Marion Jones not listed as 100m winner? She is listed as such in her article. Barcovelero 02:27, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Marion Jones
Talk:Peruvian Ribereño Spanish

message: This article needs to explicity cite its sources, and sections seem to be in unidiomatic English, so I will make minor revisions.  Kemet 02:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Citations and English

message: There needs to be an article on Peruvian Spanish. This article is on a subcategory of Peruvian Spanish. Gringo300 (talk) 18:31, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Peruvian Spanish

message: I made a number of improvements to this article, with various degrees of success.  The article really needs a lot of help, especially from people who know the references used.
* It looks like there's plenty of references in the "Bibliographic Sources" section, but whoever added those failed to use them in the article body itself.  That person missed an opportunity to compose an otherwise good article by Wikipedia standards.  I wonder if the "citation needed" warnings could all be resolved by pointing to the right references already present in the "Bibliographic Sources" section, thereby rendering the "Nofootnotes" warning obsolete.  I was able to resolve only one of these reference issues, and only because there was only one explicit markup reference already used, but improperly formed.
* The way it was written, the mention of large Japanese and Chinese populations contributing many words to Peruvian Coast Spanish makes the reader think that the language contains a lot of Chinese and Japanese words.  Only some Cantonese words are used.  No Japanese words are used in everyday communication, unless specifically speaking of things Japanese (karate, kimono, sayonara.)  Hence, I removed the reference to Japanese words, but left the Chinese to indicate that there is at least some Chinese influence.
* The article also gave the reader the impression that much of the slang in Peruvian Coast Spanish is a Spanish form of Pig Latin, when it isn't.  While that form is popular, it does not constitute a major portion of how slang is spoken.  Thus I've softened the presentation to indicate that while this form of Spanish Pig Latin does exist, it is not as prevalent as originally implied.
Panicpgh (talk) 00:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: References and other improvements to the article
Talk:Music magazine

message: The redirect The Music Magazine has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  मल्ल (talk) 20:35, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:The Music Magazine]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Additive meter

message: I propose that this article be merged into the Additive meters section under Time signature, or vice versa, with the above section reduced to a summary. As is, there's more information in that section than this article.
— trlkly 04:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur. It seems silly to have subsections of a parent article that are actually more comprehensive than the offspring. Should not the article Additive rhythm also be considered here, though?—Jerome Kohl (talk) 05:45, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

text: I agree, but having two articles on the subject still seems redundant to me -Zadamanim  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.82.240.3 (talk) 04:18, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Air (music)

message: What is the difference between an air and an art song?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.124.38 (talk) 06:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Question

message: This "the name of various song-like vocal or instrumental compositions." does not say anything.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.229.181.40 (talk) 05:08, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Calling it "a variant of the musical song form" and then saying it's song-like is circular. I agree with the comments above. This article doesn't say what an air is, and I'd sure like to know. Dcs002 (talk) 02:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is an air?
Talk:Arch form

message: I'm listeninng to an explanation of the Gospel of Thomas and a new theory that its sayings are poems written in arch form (It's at http://thegodabovegod.com/ and the segment is "Bob North on Secrets of the Gospel of Thomas"). Should the present article include mention of this? Is it the same basic phenomenon? __meco (talk) 11:25, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Chiastic structure seems to be it. __meco (talk) 11:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  In poetry also