lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rượu cần

message: Is this something consumed only by ethnic minorities, or do Viet people also make and drink this? Badagnani 11:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: About 15 years ago there was a boom of rượu cần drinking in Ha Noi. But now I only see rượu cần in some Ha Noi's restaurants. I don't think Kinh people have tradition of making rượu cần.--Bình Giang (talk) 03:06, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Which ethnic groups?

message: I know of clubs in Hanoi where one can drink this, while musicians play trong com (rice drum). One pays a woman and you pour wine from a buffalo horn into a large clay jar, and you look into the eyes of the woman while both drink from a straw from the same clay jar simultaneously. This should be noted. Badagnani 11:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hanoi clubs

message: What is the strength (in percent alcohol by volume)? If no fixed strength, what is the range? Badagnani 11:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No fixed strength, but the range may be from 15 to 25 degree. I guess so from my own experiences. I saw some Kinh people added rượu đế or rượu quốc lủi instead of water to a rượu cần jar to raise the strength.--Bình Giang (talk) 03:10, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Strength

message: Is this commercially available? If so, where, who produces it, and how is it packaged? Badagnani 11:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been commercially available since the early 1990s. I found it was sold in Hoa Binh provinces by Kinh people. I also found a shop in Hanoi sell it and the owners are Kinh people too. Kinh people may dynamic in  business, so they learn the rượu cần making method from ethenic minorities and commercialize it.--Bình Giang (talk) 03:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes, I mean "percent". Sorry for my so terrible English.--Bình Giang (talk) 04:19, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Commercially available?

message: Is this a fermented rice wine, or a distilled one? Badagnani 11:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It is a fermented rice wine.--Bình Giang (talk) 03:19, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fermented or distilled?

message: Is it cloudy (white, milky) in appearance, or clear? Is there sediment? Badagnani 11:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The one I drank was milky. But I heard that the color is depend on which herbs are used.--Bình Giang (talk) 03:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Appearance

message: Which exact herbs are used? Badagnani 11:31, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Herbs are varied and depend on ethnic groups and regions--Bình Giang (talk) 03:23, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Herbs
Category talk:Episcopal cathedrals in the United States

message: I find it peculiar that the cathedral church of Saint John the Divine in New York City is listed under "S" in this list.  May I suggest that the list be ordered alphabetically by the names of the cities in which they're located? Unfree (talk) 18:24, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it's more usual to list churches in general by their title instead of their location. (If we were listing churches in a single city, the geographical breakdown would, umm, break down.) I don't see the need for a change. -- BPMullins | Talk 15:11, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Better still, they should should be piped so that Cathedral of All Saints, for example, is under A, not C. clariosophic (talk) 23:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Order
File talk:MarsTransition.jpg

message: Hi, really nice images, but I don't understand the encyclopaedic aspect of it. Surely its a little bit crystal ball? 129.78.64.101 11:32, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It works well in support of the article on terraforming -- not much chance of having any pictures of real examples of terraforming BroMonque 12:41, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Unidirectional network

message: The following introduces the term DSTO without prior/post reference nor link nor definition nor quotation?  I could assume what DSTO might refer to, however there are 2 countries that have DSTO in the Wiki disambiguation(and that's assuming even one of those was the one intended by the author)....:
"The US Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) has developed its own unidirectional network called the Network[16] Pump. This is in many ways similar to DSTO's work"
DNSLOC (talk) 06:55, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  reference to DSTO 

message: IMO the article was a bit spammy, therefore I took out the spammy bits.  I don't believe that they add anything to the article, but I am open to argument.  Springnuts 11:36, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Older talk points 

message: The linked blog at the end of the article ( colinrobbins.me/category/data-diode/ ) shows little relevance to the topic and should therefore be considered as SPAM and removed 80.121.81.227 (talk) 09:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought so too. Done. Thanks.  ★NealMcB★ (talk) 17:56, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Linked blog likley SPAM
Talk:Lamitan

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Baybay, Leyte which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 21:46, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Lapuyan

message: This article does not cite any references or sources, and is full of original research. It needs a lot of help from someone familiar with the topic.P0PP4B34R732 (talk) 00:56, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: References needed
Talk:Las Navas

message: gusto malaman ang paputa sa  brgy bugay las navas northern samar  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna kenneth (talk • contribs) 14:15, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  hi gud am 
Talk:Gaspar Yanga

message: There seems to be more documented about the 1609 battle and the maroons' gaining independence for their settlement. It does not really seem appropriate to list him with a 1570 revolt on the Slave Revolts table, about which there is virtually no information - at least as is obvious here. If that is to be listed, more content and sourcing needs to be provided.Parkwells (talk) 16:26, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about classification
Talk:Fela Sowande

message: Sources state that he was born in Lagos, Oyo, or Abeokuta. Which is correct? Badagnani (talk) 01:09, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I'm finding conflicting info too. http://www.hierographics.org/felasowandephilosophyandopinions.htm and http://www.internationalopus.com/cgi-bin/io.pl?mode=composer&composer=28 both say Abeokuta. Aaron Horne's Brass Music of Black Composers: A Bibliography says Oyo. http://etd.lsu.edu/docs/available/etd-02212004-111053/unrestricted/Sadoh_dis.pdf and http://www.malge.co.uk/Fresh/perspectives/compbiog_sowande.html say Lagos. I'd suggest seeing if any family members have a presence on the web, and try to query them if so; if not, I guess we just say multiple sources have identified different places as the site of his birth. Picaroon (t) 03:05, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birthplace 

message: Added citation link to liner note essay, and for full disclosure I work for the non-profit educational resource linked to.Ribbonabaca (talk) 20:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: citation
Talk:Cheekies

message: Is there a reason why the first sentence says "Not to be confused with CHIKOS" - is there regularly confusion between Australian lollys and American cosmic radiation scientific/educational programmes? Should this link somewhere else? Jjhunt 12:21, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: "Due to the image of a baby in the same colour as the lolly featured on the front of the packaging, they were previously called Chicos in Australia."
Is it saying that they were previously called Chicos because of the baby on the packaging? What's the source for this info? 14.2.140.219 (talk) 03:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed. Better explained elsewhere in the article. Doctorhawkes (talk) 10:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit Recommended. Meaning unclear. Possible source needed.
Talk:Bizzell Memorial Library

message: This article and Bizzell Library are on the same building and should be merged. Bizzell Memorial Library is the official name, so the article should be under that title. Dsmdgold (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree.↔NMajdan•talk 15:33, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree, and implemented the merger.  Thanks for noticing the duplicative articles.  Makes a better article now;  the two carried mostly different information.  I replaced the "no sources" tag with a "refimprove" tag for the article;  the library holdings info, the building additions history, and other info in the article still need references. doncram (talk) 16:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: One pic illustrates the article but additional photos and/or photo uploads are needed.
*HABS photos do not seem to be available for this site.
*Source/ownership of NRHP photos linked in article is unclear.
*New photos would be helpful.
:There are some additional pictures here.↔NMajdan•talk 01:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Photos
Talk:Drăguș (river)

message: Why is Dragus River a redlink?  If you are just going to hide this away so it cannot be found, we might as well just take it to WP:AfD now.  Gene Nygaard 12:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hidden away
Category talk:Japonic languages

message: Hi guys,
I'm wondering if this is true; I heard that one of the Japonic, I think it's a Ryukuan langauge, which uses consonants other than /n/ in coda.  I could've swore I read it in Wikipedia before.  Could someone verify this for me? I think it's one of the smaller ones, but finding out if this is true or if I dreamt it would be really useful. InnocentOdion 12:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Japanoic/Ryukuan language with consonants in coda?
Talk:Nokia 3110 classic

message: Can someone confirm or deny that the 3109 Classic is the same as the 3110 Classic, but without the phone? Martin Packer 12:59, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Same but without the camera or radio - it still has a phone :P 81.137.203.168 (talk) 12:33, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

text: with the previous verson of the OS as well  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.126.221.242 (talk) 20:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Someone placed a "considered for deletion" banner in the article, but no explanation is given in discussion.
:This is addressed in an archived discussion. You can view it by clicking here. It has not been nominated recently. Legion211 (talk) 01:32, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is this page considered for deletion?
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Greater Manchester/Assessment

message: Longdendale Bypass has been assessed as Low Importance, used for  "suburbs, small stations/metro stops, branch libraries, leisure centres, Grade II listed buildings, local parks". I would have put such a thorny issues that is raising so many hackles much higher. The current rating feels like a POV. Given that it has the attention of major national agencies such as CPRE, Highways Agency and has been rumbling for some 20 years I would say it was High: "major structural elements of Greater Manchester, or subjects of UK importance" PeterIto (talk) 00:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: The Longdendale Bypass

message: Wouldn't something with examples from the Greater Manchester project be more relevant for the table of assessment guidelines? I've made up an example here, and it's easily edited:
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nev1 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment scale

message: Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.
We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations. 
A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible. 
We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection before December 2008, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 16:14, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Merseyside
Talk:Abolition of Feudal Tenure etc. (Scotland) Act 2000

message: Davidkinnen 22:45, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

message: Maybe add in the details about this law cutting the ties between a Scottish Feudal Barony and ownership of the caput of the barony?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.90.120 (talk) 12:53, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:The Tent (Paulsen novel)

message: So this is not a novel but reviews vary on what other term would be correct. Rather than enter that debate, I suggest we either move the page to The Tent (Paulsen) or The Tent (Paulsen book). Any opinions? , thank you for spotting the problem. Innisfree987 (talk) 17:43, 24 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title
Category talk:Opera terminology

message: It is unfortunate that this category is called "opera terminology" because many of the terms are not exclusive to opera, but are appropriate to singing in general (whatever genre).  Similarly, there is a template called opera terms which should be combined with this page, and both renamed "vocal" or "singing" terms.  Might some workaholic Wikipedian want to reorganized it? kosboot 14:26, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Categories are not exclusive. Articles can belong to more than one. This category fulfills a useful purpose in collecting together articles on terms relating to opera for readers of opera articles. There is no reason to rename it. -- Kleinzach 14:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:MOSIX

message: The article claims that "After MOSIX became proprietary software in late 2001, Moshe Bar forked the last free version and started the openMosix project on February 10, 2002"
The fact is that at the time of fork, MOSIX was still open source software under the GPL license.   It was only after, and as a result, of that fork that the MOSIX team decided to close the MOSIX sources.
Hence the correct text should therefore read:
In late 2001, Moshe Bar forked the last free-source version of MOSIX and started the openMosix project on Feb 10, 2002.  The MOSIX team responded by closing subsequent versions of the MOSIX source-code.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.171.157.70 (talk) 13:58, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Order of events is reversed 
Template talk:Lang-rue

message: I haven't noticed the existence of this template, and I created  for Rusyn. The W3C recommendation is to use always the shorter language code, and that's reflected in the documentation of template , so IMHO this template should be redirected to  and not the reverse as today. Has this language any specific characteristic for that exceptional behavior? Best regards —surueña 14:25, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Rusyn language doesn't list "ry" as an ISO 639 code. Perhaps someone could add it, and your suggestion could be taken. Hyacinth (talk) 10:37, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language code
Talk:Scincus scincus

message: This article is in badly need of sources and cititations. I will try to look for sources to verify the information presented in the artilce. TheLou75 (talk) 23:14, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: I clicked play and that video???? Um. It's very loud. What happened to it? Did they accidentally dip it in a car crusher or something? Mute It. GuggyBones (talk) 05:29, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  what the
Talk:CGG (company)

message: I propose merging the page Compagnie Générale de Géophysique into this one. Please see my reasoning there. Kwinkunks (talk) 17:34, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge from Compagnie Générale de Géophysique

message: This article is mostly a puff about how wonderful they are, and heavily edited by CGG itself.  CGG is not a RS for other than straightforward factual detail (when formed, name of chairman, turnover figures and the like). Davidships (talk) 20:53, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Self-advertising 

message: This is an unsourced 2007 article. Aside from the COI tag there are concerns of OR.  Otr500 (talk) 15:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article issues
Talk:André Butzer

message: The article Andre Butzer has information about the same person here, André Butzer. The information should be merged and Andre Butzer should redirect to this article with the correct spelling of the name with the é (diacritical acute e). Group29 14:53, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Completed Group29 (talk) 19:02, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Vulnerability assessment

message: Hi, this article seems to me quite focused on the topic but a bit incomplete. Can anyone help expanding it?  Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 12:52, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please expand article 

message: These topics seem to be the same; I'm very new to wiki editing, but maybe someone with more experience can merge this page with Vulnerability assessment (computing). Fusate (talk) 19:54, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  merge with Vulnerability Assessment(computing)
Talk:Stadium Beyond the Stars

message: "Stadium Beyond the Stars is a part of the Winston Science Fiction set, a series of juvenile novels which have become famous for their influence on young science fiction readers and their exceptional cover illustrations by award winning artists."
"Is?"  Hasn't this novel been out of print for about sixty years?  Isn't "was" more appropriate?  And was that description just typed in from the publisher's blurb on the back cover?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:400:8000:A140:E405:791:731C:DF6 (talk) 08:48, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Is" or "was?"
Talk:Ratz (TV series)

message: Was Wimsieland even real?? --ChowderRulez (talk) 05:27, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I am pretty sure it is not. We should just remove it.--Delibirda (talk) 10:21, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wimsieland?? 

message: If someone can cite who voiced who (regarding the humans of the series), please feel free to do so. I'm pretty sure the credits don't list anyone. That, and the official videos cut them out, if I recall correctly. I'm not saying IMDb is a reliable source, but the Captain and Benny's voices there would be a possibility. WannurSyafiqah74 (talk) 06:38, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Voice cast
Talk:IGA Stadium

message: Uniprix's own website along with the Montreal Gazette and countless other sources, show that Uniprix Stadium is a commonly used English name. I propose to move to Uniprix Stadium, therefore, per WP:ENGLISH and WP:NCGN. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: I propose merging Jarry Park Stadium into Stade IGA. The Jarry Park Stadium article refers to Stade IGA as its current form after renovation, and the picture at the top is of the tennis stadium. -- bmitchelf•T•F 18:56, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it would be far better to keep separate articles and return the Jarry Park Stadium article to its focus on the baseball stadium with reference to this article for the tennis stadium. They really are two different things in spite of sharing elements and a location. -- Pemilligan (talk) 15:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Closed, with a refocus of Jarry Park Stadium. Klbrain (talk) 17:38, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal
Talk:Linea alba (cheek)

message: Could some kind soul translate the first paragraph of the article to English, please? -- pne (talk) 15:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation

message: "Linea alba (Latin for white line) is also..." How can "also" make sense? Unfree (talk) 19:03, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening words
Category talk:Eponymous categories

message: Currently there is much practical variation (browse the categories), some discussion at Wikipedia talk:Categorization (currently sections 1, 1.1, and 6), and perhaps dispute about how eponymous categories and their main articles should be categorized.
That is, which kinds of categories should contain both eponymous categories (as subcategories) and their main articles (as pages)? Which should contain only the eponymous categories? Which should contain only the main articles?
The linked discussion (section 1 Wikipedia talk:Categorization#Eponymous categories) points here. --P64 (talk) 23:57, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed Families both from being placed directly in this category, as well as being placed directly in People. Instead I created Multiple people and put Families in it, along with three other subcategories. Eponymous should directly contain only subcategories that can't comfortably be placed in higher-order Eponymous Categories. This is so as to reduce clutter. Okay?--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 20:43, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Categorization 

message: I created User:Mercurywoodrose/Userboxes/Eponymous Categories to express exaggerated concern for this category. of course, i do recognize the arguments presented for it as rationally based and being of some use, and I dont question the intent of those creating them. i just wish it had a larger discussion, and i am stumped on how to generate more discussion without appearing like i am canvassing. I do add articles to these categories when i notice they are missing, i just dont remove all other categories when i do so, but leave a few basic ones. I also dont remove these categories. I like to play well with others even if im passionate about a topic, and i hope i do come off that way.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 07:08, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: to be fair, created a pro epocat userbox: User:Mercurywoodrose/Userboxes/Eponymous Categories pro.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:03, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Userbox

message: There should be fewer subcategories placed directly in this category. :Category:Wikipedia categories named after borders and :Category:Wikipedia categories named after landforms should be instead placed in :Category:Wikipedia categories named after objects. And :Category:Wikipedia categories named after constellations should be placed in :Category:Wikipedia categories named after astronomical objects, itself a subcategory of :Category:Wikipedia categories named after objects.--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 05:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fewer