Talk:Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Hong Kong)

message: It is a good organization!0101miniho06 03:27, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Believing that an article has an owner is a common mistake people make on Wikipedia. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. See Wikipedia:Ownership of articles and Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages . --Geniac 00:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: October 2006

message: Hi,
The latest issue of the Pawprint should be issue 65 from 1st of November.But i dunno how to put the hyperlink on the page,is there anyone can help?
Thz
Kate
hi there, 
well i think the quantity is not what matters, the most importantly is the quality of everything we write! but of course if we can search for some more relative information of SPCA then it'd be really good. but the fact is, we should organize what we have here now. and, most importantly, i think we didnt do enough discussion here! =P maybe we should really discuss a bit before we add any new things into it? and to the other groupmates, beside me, lucia and stella, if you guys see what we write here, we are looking forward to discuss with you here about our page!0101kennis06 16:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Believing that an article has an owner is a common mistake people make on Wikipedia. When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. See Wikipedia:Ownership of articles and Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages . --Geniac 00:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  how to do our mid-term project 

message: dear all,
after attening the tutorial today , i think our page still needs a lot of improvement,
i think we should maybe find other resources other than the offical website.
i found out that, in fact, some people really do not trust the society , they had a negative feeling towards spca, should we put those negative news in our page?0101luciawang06 06:50, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, criticisms should be included on any topic if they exist; see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Also, see my comment above; please remember that this is not "your page"; this is a publicly editable article on Wikipedia. --Geniac 16:01, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

text: Please add comments underneath the comment you are replying to; it makes it easier for everybody to follow the conversation. Thank you. --Geniac 18:42, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

text: so, lucia and stella, you mean just delete it straight away without informing anyone? since our other groupmates don't show up too often here...i wonder if they know the discussion part?0101kennis06 17:18, 2 November 2006 (UTC
i think they know gua, however, i think we can do nothing but wait a little longer 0101luciawang06 17:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

text: my dog has an excident by a car so I don't now what must I do plz help me
😭😭 41.116.71.93 (talk) 13:10, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: November 2006

message: hi guys, i just put on some pics , but i think they are too big , i do't know how to edit it smaller, can everyone help?0101luciawang06 06:27, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: my dog has an excident by a car so I don't now what must I do plz help me
😭😭 41.116.71.93 (talk) 13:10, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Urgent

message: I'm doing a few edits. Noticed that the first sentence of the article is a little busy-looking with the name of the organization, and then (SPCA (HK)) and then the Chinese name. I think it's good enough to leave out the short form (SPCA (HK)) so will delete that part. It will be more readable.
This sentence early on has a bad link: "The SPCA (HK) is a registered Hong Kong charity whose remit is not only actively to pursue the cause of animal welfare primarily in Hong Kong but also in the rest of China and the region." I found that it does have an outreach program to China and will link that somewhere.
I'm going to remove the notability warning (reproduced here):  as it's clear the organization is notable, it just needs a few more sources. 
The long list of programs relating to animal welfare is now in several sections. I'm going to consolidate it into one section. The section about Euthanasia I'm going to put in a separate section called Controversy. Also found a recent link about a protest that was held.
The section now called "Recent Action" I'm going to call "Campaigns". I put references to some of the existing campaigns, and added one about shark fin soup that has received a lot of attention worldwide.
Canadianknowledgelover (talk) 02:58, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updates