lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Eye examination

message: I think this should be merged with vision test.--76.93.42.50 (talk) 02:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Vision test now is about only the Snellen chart. That test is just one of many tests that could be performed during an eye examination. I suggest the articles be kept separate. Robert P. O'Shea (talk) 19:23, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

text: These articles should probably be split again. Nowadays, eye examination are about more than just testing the vision. Many retinopathies are related to diabetes, blood pressure, etc. There are even research projects studying the shape of retinal vessels to predict disease risks without relation to vision (peripheral artery disease, cardiovascular risk, dementia, etc.) A vision test is only one type of eye examination NicGambarde (talk) 11:48, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: merge with [[vision test]]

message: A rare requirement, but necessary to have one fitted to get the best results asthetically.
Kanti Fatania Ocularist  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.152.213.34 (talk) 16:53, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  artificial eyes 

message: It would be good if someone could add details of how astigmatism is tested for, and whether it is best to include correction for low value astigmatism in a prescription or not. --Lindosland (talk) 10:59, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article lacks information on astigmatism
Talk:Lewis Downing

message: A flag on the main page claims that the article has issues and needs more citations. The flag is now nearly four years old, but there is no clarification about exactly what is needed. Can someone clarify the requirements? Otherwise, I think the flag should be removed and the article reclassified to Class C. Bruin2 (talk) 05:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Issues and citations banner

message: Hello. 
I have added inline citations needed templates to this article, it actually needs quite a few of them, and I know the question had been asked if the flag should be removed because it was so old, but I don't think it can be removed right now because so many inline citations are needed. Hope I'm doing this right, it is my first time posting to a Talk page!
Azbookchick (talk) 17:07, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inline Citations
Talk:Dragging Canoe

message: Colonial implies at some level being under the power of a foriegn authorit.  Draggin Canoe never recognied auhority beyond the Cherokees.  He should not be classed as colonial.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This is one of a number of discussions (started by John Pack Lambert) that are forked from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2012 November 16#Category:Tennessee colonial people. Rather than conduct discussions of this topic in a dozen different places, let's have just one discussion. Please continue the discussion at the WP:CFD page. --Orlady (talk) 06:13, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Comment the outcome of this discussion is totally different then the outcome of the issue at CfD.  No matter how you name it it is still imposing imperialism on people who were not part of the empire.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:41, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clearly not colonial 

message: The Chickamauga nation is not Cherokee. George Washington 4th address states this. The split took place over the main body of the Cherokee nation wanted to sell to settlers. The Chickamauga didn't. We never rejoined the Cherokee nation. AYA TSIGAMOGI.   Mikebull1129 (talk) 19:03, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi Mike. As discussed in the Chickamauga Cherokee article, the Chickamauga were originally Cherokee but split from the Cherokee nation. However, they are still referred to by reliable sources as Cherokee, so that's what Wikipedia must follow. Cheers, Λυδαcιτγ 01:21, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chickamauga  

message: How much more of a reliable source is there than a chickamauga? We have even proven this fact to the state of tennessee and have had tennessee blue book history changed because of it. Mikebull1129 (talk) 16:06, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chickamauga.
Talk:Chief Earth Woman

message: * I got a possible hit on her name through a Google Scholar search in Cousins, Emily, "Mountains Made Alive: Native American Relationships with Sacred Land," CrossCurrents 46:4 pp. 497-509 (Winter 1996/96), but I don't have access to JSTOR to read the article.
* Appears to be some relevant critique of Landes on page 231 of Leacock, Eleanor et al., "Women's Status in Egalitarian Society: Implications for Social Evolution," Current Anthropology 19:2 (June 1978).
W.stanovsky (talk) 22:27, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two more possible sources
Talk:Estanislao

message: What made him an "alcalde"? Was he a government official or a chief of his own people? Kortoso (talk) 20:32, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alcalde? 

message: At the entry "notorius" the Online Oxford English Dictionary says  "With neutral or favourable connotations. …  With depreciative or unfavourable connotations. … In some cases it is not possible to ascertain the writer's intent. Some milder quotations may belong at sense [(1)]. … Of a reprehensible action, fact, etc.: noted or well known for its egregiousness; flagrant. … Well known on account of something which is not generally approved of or admired; unfavourably known; noted for some bad practice, quality, etc." 
For three centuries, or more, European settlers in North America, or their descendents, have vilified Native Americans and the actions they took to defend themselves. Therefore, using the word "notorious" to describe Estanislao, leaves the reader with the clear option to take the meaning in the negative sense. I replaced it with "famous for" which is neutral in this context. Nick Beeson (talk) 12:45, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notorious
Talk:Gall (Native American leader)

message: He weighed 300 lbs? Does not look like that on the photo, looks closer to 200 lbs to me. What was his height then? And what is the source for that? J.B. (talk) 10:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  300 lbs? 
Talk:Heinkel HeS 011

message: Ok, should this be under Heinkel HeS 001, or Heinkel-Hirth HeS 001? Anyone? Maury 15:00, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Saving the 'informative' caption here due to adding an infobox. The diagonal stage and three axial stages can be seen near the center of the engine, followed by the annular combustion chamber and two turbines in orange.  Stators for the axial stages are just visible, in blue.  Some of the fuel injection "fingers" can been seen just behind the axial stages on the "far side" of the engine.  The impeller is located at the end of the green intake tube, and is not visible in this photograph. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 15:05, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Photo caption

message: According to this Google entry for the museum, one additional engine exists, albeit in a very deteriorated state., 195.240.122.205 (talk) 20:06, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional "survivor" at the Freeman Army Airfield Museum in Seymour, Indiana, USA
Talk:Gao Gang

message: I tidied this page, removing spelling errors and adding sections.  I also added several different interpretations of what happened behind the scenes, something that remains uncertain.  And made it clear that Gao Gang remained officially condemned.  Finally I removed the 'stub' marker, which has been there since it was just a single paragraph.  It can't still be viewed as a stub, though undoubtedly more could be added, including a non-copyright photo.
--GwydionM 15:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Gao Gang

message: Much as I admire Professor Frederick C. Teiwes' fine work, my view is that 21 out of 31 citations to a single source is stretching it. DOR (HK) (talk) 09:29, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Heinkel HeS 30

message: As in the -011 article, should this be titled Heinkel, or Heinkel-Hirth? Maury 15:03, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

message: I'm sorry but i couldn't reconcile the article with the B-class assessment as was. I have re-assessed it. Would somebody like to take this article on and try and achieve the original assessment?Petebutt (talk) 11:16, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: What position did Herbert Wagner hold? His article does not say. RASAM (talk) 22:09, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Herbert Wagner
Talk:Demon Internet

message: The original CIX conference where the idea was floated was called tenner_a_month, I think --scruss 15:03, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yup, that's right. ZoeP 01:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tenner a month source

message: See Talk:Internet_Watch_Foundation#Demon_UK_ISP_blocking_Wayback_Machine_via_IWF.27s_blacklist.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.212.134.39 (talk) 19:59, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Now apparently fixed. It seems somebody blundered. JH (talk page) 22:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  They seem to be blocking the Wayback Machine, at the momement. 

message: The name "Demon" came from a list of shelf names available at the time. I for one have no idea what a "shelf name" is in this context. JH (talk page) 09:49, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. You should know if anyone does. :) JH (talk page) 16:18, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of jargon in the article 

message: * https://support.vodafone.co.uk/Broadband/Demon-broadband/872225242/What-s-happening-to-my-Demon-email-service.htm
* http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2016/07/vodafone-uk-scrap-free-demon-email-service-broadband-users.html
* https://www.names.co.uk/mydemon-email  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 156.43.71.1 (talk) 16:09, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Demon email addresses terminating summer 2016
Talk:Pirates (2005 film)

message: Spam. Inappropriate material for Wikipedia. I come for research, not for porn ads.
: Agree, so I change the redirects of pirates to pirate (ie: the sea pirate) instead.  In addition, the writeups for the article seems like an advertisement.  Hopefully, it will be re-written.  Otherwise, it may be WP:AfD candidates.  --Hurricane111 20:00, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Censorship

message: I really don't see how this article is a stub any more.  Anyone agree or disagree?  If I don't hear from anyone in 7 days, I'll de-stub it myself.  --Mr Vain 07:46, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Meh, I'm removing it.  I'm not patient enough to wait that long and the last posting in this talk was done months ago. --Mr Vain 00:54, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  de-stubbing? 

message: pirates xxx was not the most expensive pornographic film ever produced, caligula was. SOMEONE FIX THIS  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.79.81.4 (talk) 04:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lies in the opening paragraph 

message: The DVD is now out for Pirates II there is a WP entry for it, but it's a stub. Needs someone to flesh it out Pirates_II:_Stagnetti's_RevengeGkleinman (talk)  —Preceding undated comment was added at 19:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pirates II 

message: Here are links to XCritic's reviews for Pirates Blu-Ray Pirates 2  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gkleinman (talk • contribs) 21:08, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reviews 

message: In the intro it says the budget is 10 million, but below the main image it says the budget is 1 million. Should change one of them to the (correct) answer for truth and consistency  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.32.168.53 (talk) 23:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  inconsistent budget 

message: 'The sequel, Pirates II: Stagnetti's Revenge, was made on an even bigger budget of $8 million, and it is considered the most expensive porn film ever produced.'  This is no longer true, because "Star Wars XXX" has a budget of around $11 - $12 million.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.244.29.41 (talk) 10:28, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  No longer the highest
Talk:Caledonian Brewery

message: Craig - or other interested editors, can we get the ownership bit right? As I understand it, S&N owns 100% of the physical brewery site, and a minoriry share holding in the Caledonian brewing company ltd.(two differnt things I think). The brewing site is opererated by the brewing company - but not owned by it.
Does this make sense and can others validate or otherwise before I commit to an edit in the article. Warburton62 23:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I was about to say, be sure to find (and add) a ref to back it up :) /wangi 23:44, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  These 2 articles from the Scotsman have more details about the ownership:    . --Vclaw 00:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownership 

message: This article should be merged with Caledonian Brewing Company.  The website of the brewing company in question. -- BlueCanoe 05:59, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Merged Caledonian Brewing Company into this article as suggested. -- BlueCanoe 23:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge
Talk:Aermacchi MB-339

message: footnote 11 link does not work and is invalid. Therefore no source has been provided.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericandude (talk • contribs) 08:42, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The content appears to have moved to here - in anycase, acdcording to Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Preventing_and_repairing_dead_links - this should have been tagged as a dead link rather than deleted . There are other problems with the section, however, as it seems to a selective cut and paste job from the AICH article , which seems dangerously close to copyvio.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:35, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eritrea section 
Talk:Goat of Mendes

message: The former text here, unedited by me  read in its entirety as follows:
:"The goat of Mendes was a temple goat utilized in an ancient cult in the city of Mendes, Egypt.  Supposedly, the goat copulated with priestesses in certain religious ceremonies.
:"The cult was known for its bestiality (and may have even been practiced) at the inception of Christianity during the reign of the Roman Empire.  The practices of the Mendes cult inspired the Christian association of goats with Satan and paganism in general.  This idea was especially strong during the Middle Ages, but persists to modern times.
:"The pentagram, a symbol utilized by pagans and Satanists alike, is also sometimes referred to as the goat of Mendes or goat head of Mendes as a result of this association."  
None of this is factual. The confusion with the ram god of Mendes in Egypt was made by the occultist Eliphas Lévi  in his Dogme et Rituel de la Haute Magie (1855), which has given rise to a flood of fanciful but spurious eclectic connections, such as "The Goat of Mendes" by the black metal band Akercocke.
A redirect has been made to Baphomet. --Wetman 15:15, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Portal talk:Trains/Anniversaries/June 3

message: The Eschede desaster on 06/03/1998 was not the worst railroad desaster in Germany. (Only the worst after World War II.) The worst ever was the bombing of Treuchtlingen station on 23rd of February 1945 with over 600 killed and 1500 injured people. The second was a train collision in Genthin station on 22nd of December 1939 with 186 killed and 106 injured people. Many greetings, --Thomas Goldammer 15:15, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Don't know how I missed the comment this long, but I've updated the text to add "since World War II".  I plan to add the others you mention to the appropriate anniversary pages today... Slambo (Speak) 17:15, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Slambo (Speak) 17:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eschede
Talk:Arcade Fire (EP)

message: The unofficial album name is mentioned in the last paragraph of the pitchfork review here: http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/453-arcade-fire-ep/ (also linked to in the article).  I have no idea how to add references, but if someone else gets a chance, that's apparently where the info came from. 24.35.53.30 (talk) 20:29, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Us Kids Know" citation 

message: Why "The Arcade Fire EP"? The cover says "Arcade Fire" only!
Yes but its an EP. An EP is too long to be qualified as a single and too short to be qualified as an album. Read wikipedia's article on EP's.
:Although it's not a point that is easy to come to consensus on, I agree with you if you're saying that the disc is "Arcade Fire" and the band is "The Arcade Fire". -- 203.11.167.254 04:45, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The? 
Talk:Ishtakhaba

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Sleepy Eyes. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 26#Sleepy Eyes until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Cielquiparle (talk) 12:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sleepy Eyes" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Shacknasty Jim

message: Why isn't there a single source for any of the claims in this article? Billy7 (talk) 07:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources
Talk:Chaoborus

message: I added some information on chaoborus living in the depths of lakes, that i read recently in a couple of papers.Twinbanj (talk) 09:38, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: If a person gets infected by a glass worm what happens to them what kind of affects does it have 2603:9000:CC09:FD00:7908:8F39:6BFA:CD00 (talk) 17:55, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glass worms 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved. Per consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 15:33, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Glassworm →  – The name of the article is the colloquial name for the larval stage, but the body of the article is about the genus and therefore all life stages. Mvolz (talk) 11:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 26 October 2022 

message: Even hiw did you see them 2409:4063:6E43:365D:C648:A55:C762:A1BB (talk) 03:37, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  If they are transparent so how did i see them
Talk:Force field (science fiction)

message: Against a Force field merger with Deflector shield. The reason is that while a deflector shield may deflect damage or destructive energy away, a force field may actually engulf or annihilate the destructive energy, thus adding to or draining the force field depending on how it works. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.148.167.103 (talk • contribs) 15:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I don't believe that a citation is needed for "No power sources currently exist that could possibly create a field of sufficient strength to act as a protective device. Thus, force fields remain firmly in the realm of science-fiction" as it's unreasonable to ask for proof of a negative. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.11.175.193 (talk • contribs) 01:49, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citation

message: Barring one instance in one of the TV movies, I would challenge anyone to cite an instance of a forcefield in Babylon 5... it was clearly established that the organic technology of the First races dissipated energy leaving only the kinetic impact but to say forcefields or anything similar were prevalent is RUBBISH. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.131.158.197 (talk) 20:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  B5 Forcefields? 

message: this link provides an excerpt from the book Physics of the Impossible, which talks about force field in fiction and puts it in terms of possibility in real life.  Seems like a very good source to improve this page. MythSearchertalk 16:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible citation
Talk:Information continuity

message: The concept of "Information continuity" seems to be one used in both medical care and in IT. This article captures the medical concept.  In IT, it is related to business continuity. —ERcheck @ 15:19, 12 February 2006
*Citations for medical usage:
**Joint Committee on Information Continuity, Kentucky Department for Mental Health and Mental Retardation.
**Quality of glaucoma care and services : Information, continuity of information and communication skills, Institute of Health Sciences and Public Health Research, University of Leeds, UK. 
**
:: Note that in in the reference above, the section is named Informational continuity and
:: that searching for that string "Informational continuity" in PubMed gets 9 refs with 3 in the title. (3 review articles too)
:: Should the article be moved to that name?
:: RDBrown (talk) 17:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Concerning AfD - references 

message: Robert 04:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AFD result - keep
Talk:United Torah Judaism

message: How about something on what the party stands for?
KPalicz 15:23, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Is there any way some one who knows alot about this topic can post some of the political idears within this party?
It really needs to be adjusted to reflect the passing of Rav Eliashiv Zatzal  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bennyb613 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  More info 

message: Regarding Agudat Yisrael, this article says "The leading members of this party are the followers of the Ger, Vizhnitz, and Belz Hasidim." The article about Agudat Yisrael says "Political power is vested in the Hasidic Rebbes of Boston, Ger, Vizhnitz, and Belz." Not to split too many hairs, but I wonder if the leading members of Agudat Yisrael include any Bostoners. Leading members is an ambiguous term, but I assume it refers to those who are very active in the party rather than the rebbes themselves (who might be more influential than active). Ps8v9 (talk) 22:32, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Boston? 

message: I agree with BennyB613. This article needs a lot more information and citations for veritability. This also needs to be updated. Can someone with a bit more knowledge of this subject edit this? It would help a lot.Imurmate | (talk) 19:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Infromation? 

message: United Torah Judaism, while a deeply religious and conservative party that is increasingly more concerned with Israeli security, is hard to consider as a far-right party. For starters, UTJ has never explicitly labeled itself Zionist. Even the wiki it states that the Degel HaTorah (Banner of the Torah) party, one of the two main parties in the UTJ coalition, is named as a contrast to the flag of Israel. Its other partner, Agudat Yisrael, has always had a contentious relationship with Zionism. Many Haredi parties like UTJ or Bnei Torah, especially those with a strong support base in Jerusalem (which UTJ has), don't often affiliate with Zionism, even actively opposing it at times. We can see this both with how average Haredi Jews in Jerusalem are protesting potential conscription into the IDF and how conscription of Haredi Jews into the IDF is threatening Netanyau's emergency coalition, ESPECIALLY with members of UTJ. Thus, while I think it would be accurate for UTJ to be described as conservative and even right-wing, especially on issues related to the Chief Rabbinate, using public transportation on Shabbat, and Israeli pride parades, I wouldn't call it far-right because it lacks any commitment to either religious fundamentalism or ultranationalism, let alone both.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.141.4.65 (talk) 20:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Right-wing not far-right