lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Volpone (opera)

message: Another operatic version of Volpone was written in 2004 for Wolf Trap Opera company's performance in 2007.  The recording was nominated for a 2010 Grammy Award for Best Opera Recording.  See: http://www.wolf-trap.org/Home/Opera/History/Volpone_Grammy.aspx AND http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/the-wolf-trap-opera-company-honored-with-grammy-nomination-for-recording-of-john-mustos-volpone-78531357.html  For a review, see:   "'Volpone': Putting On Heirs".  Lisa Hopkins sang Corvina in the production.  See also: http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/wolftrap2 -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:52, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Volpone 2004/2007/2010
Talk:Confit byaldi

message: Once the recipe has been transwikied to the Wikibooks:Cookbook as they are specifically excluded from Wikipedia (see WP:ISNOT#HOWTO) - is there enough here to justify an article to itself or would it be better merged into the main Ratatouille article? I think it would be better merged. FlagSteward 21:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I wrote the article.  It's not a recipe.  The portion describing how the dish is made is relevant to the dish and its notability, in that this was created for and a significant issue in a major film.  It is a separate subject than ratatouille: a different dish with a unique history.  Wikidemo 18:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Recipe

message: This recipe, (Kellers version, the article sems to make no reference to how the original was prepared) may be a unique way of presenting ratatouille but it is certainly not a confit, it's simply pretentious. Confits almost always refer to preserved meats or fruits and occasionally to condiments.Awotter 19:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The culinary word is full of metaphors and allusions.  I would call it creative use of two different languages. Wikidemo 23:18, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name is a misnomer 

message: The opening paragraph reads, "Confit byaldi is a variation on the traditional French dish ratatouille by French chef Michel Guérard, originally developed for the Pixar film Ratatouille."
Later in the article, it says that Guérard included the dish in his 1976 book, and that Keller adapted it in 1999.  The "Ratatouille" film didn't come out until 2007.  It seems that it would be fair to mention that it was included in the film, or even (if a reliable source can be found to back the claim) that it was made famous by the film.  But "originally developed" seems very wrong, unless I'm missing something.DoctorEric (talk) 16:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin
Talk:Stokes's sea snake

message: Hi, I've noticed that this article lacks the section about "toxicity" that is usual in articles about venomous snakes. Can someone with knowledge on the matter please add it? Thanks DPdH (talk) 08:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Toxic as fuck ! 119.12.208.144 (talk) 10:43, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Toxicity section missing
Talk:Florida State University Panama City

message: Imput on the Panama City Campus page would be helpful
Videmus Omnia what is with you and trying to get rid of the FSU logo?
:The logo just needs a fair use rationale for use in this article, that's all. Videmus Omnia  Talk  05:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

message: According to www.pc.fsu.edu the founding date for the campus is 1982 as well as the campus has a second motto or saying "This FSU is for YOU" how should we aproach that here UkrNole 485 13:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Panama city information
Talk:Nuclear pore glycoprotein p62

message: This article should prehaps contain a warning not to confuse nucleoporin 62 with p62/SQSTM1, as both are named p62.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lordelicht (talk • contribs) 14:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomenclature confusion: p62 and p62/SQSTM1
Talk:Bawean deer

message: Couldn't help but notice that the conservation section said that golden jackals, dholes, Indian wolves, and leopards were predators of the Bawean deer. I.. don't think that's right, given that most of those live on the Asian mainland. I'd be surprised if there were even leopards on the island. RCIWesner (talk) 06:54, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Predators as Conservation Threats? Really? 
Talk:Sea Lion Park

message: The claim for Sea Lion Park being "first to charge admission" is incorrect. By 1877, and probably since opening in 1866, Woodward's Gardens charged 25 cents admission for adults and 10 cents for children.  See http://nbc-lumber.com/Leslie/Ch19.htm Kstern999 (talk) 18:49, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
Talk:Trolley park

message: Would it be appropriate to add Glen Echo Park to the "Still Operating" list? Even though it is no longer an amusement park (carousel notwithstanding), it is still currently operating as a park, in a similar vein to Ravinia Park which is included. LotspagHero (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Glen Echo Park
Talk:Soutzoukos

message: I do not see a compelling reason for merging. The practice on Wikipedia generally seems to prefer many parallel articles from different ethnic or national backgrounds that are linked by "See also". We already have "See also" cross links in both churchkhela and soutzoukos and, in my personal experience, it will be very disturbing to a reader who looks for "churchkhela" (say) to end up on a page with a totally different title. I vote for keeping the status quo. --Zlerman (talk) 01:22, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Though there are many cases where local variants are given their own articles, that is not Wikipedia policy.  And in all the important cases, this is not what happens: there is not a separate article on "wurst", "salsiccia", "saucisse", etc. but one article on sausage. Even for "sujuk"-style sausages (for which soutzoukos is named), we have one article sujuk, not separate articles for sucuk, суджук, سجق, σουτζούκι, etc.  Remember, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, which organizes things, not names of things. --macrakis (talk) 23:16, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree it should be merged. Otherwise there should also be a separate article for Armenian rojik. 75.57.135.164 (talk) 12:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Wave swinger

message: See Wave_Swinger NickS (talk) 16:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, and also Chair-O-Planes and Swing Carousel that redirects there. I would think that since it is not a proper name, that the lower case "s" version, that is, this article, should be the result of the merge. This is English not German, even if the manufacturer is German. Need to clarify which trademarks are whose. It seems Bertazzon uses "Swing Carousel" for example. I would propose merge all the articles together. W Nowicki (talk) 22:46, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplicates exist
Talk:Secretary of State of Texas

message: My attempts at fixing a dead link were reverted. I don't want to get involved in a reversion war. But it was reverted with a statement "Do not just simply remove dead links, it has already been tagged as dead link. Fix the link if you can." I did fix the dead link. Now we have the old dead link back. Please explain your actions in putting dead links into to replace valid links to the NRIS database. KudzuVine (talk) 01:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: The "link" you provided was just to a search page on the NRIS, not a fix for the dead link.--UnQuébécois (talk) 02:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This was the fix that the original dead link probably referred to. The intended link was nothing but a search page. The web is dynamic and changes. My solution will point to the database and the NRHP Wikiproject will keep it current. This goes to the search page on NRIS that was intended. I personally don't see the need the for the reference. The article is about the Secretary of State and not the building. You have rejected the standard solution. Now you have the personal responsibility in removing the article from Category:All NRHP articles with dead external links. You need to find an alternative source for the NRHP of the building. It would be desirable to make one that will never change.  KudzuVine (talk) 02:25, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: NRIS

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.sos.state.tx.us/about/duties.shtml and other pages of the same website. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:39, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Bekisar

message: A new infobox  has been created for chicken articles.  If you see anywhere it needs improved please contact User:Stepshep.  If it meets your criteria it is requested you add it to this article's page for standardization. Thanks! §hep  •  ¡Talk to me! 17:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Chickenbreed Infobox

message: Multiple issues make this a stub - please help with WP:RS SatuSuro 03:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: This article seems to lift the text from this webpage wholesale.
Now, other sites has the same exact paragraphs, so it will take a while to find who actually wrote the original text. However, we on Wikipedia can't really keep it around. Added to that is the issue of the text being both informationally essential and largely unsourced; i haven't found proper literature discussing the Green Junglefowl's resistance to salt and dehydration.
This will take a while to resolve.Anthropophoca (talk) 06:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plagiarism
Talk:Third Fleet (Australia)

message: Totals don't add up. Total for Matilda is 10 too few & Total is 10 too much. Which is correct, Matilda total or Total of convicts?Sleigh (talk) 10:16, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: ''Matilda''

message: According to the particular pages for the ships Queen and Albamarle, the numbers in the table for those two ships seems to be switched.82.113.113.82 (talk) 07:08, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: They were switched. I have corrected the info. It is now correct.Acad Ronin (talk) 20:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Numbers for Queen/Albemarle 

message: Why are here two names only under ”convict arrivals in the Third Fleet? Don’t we know more names? It’s a shame to mention two names only from such a huge fleet.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.192.114.104 (talk) 23:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two names only?
Talk:West North Central states

message: Why is St Louis, Missouri listed twice on the population list? 2600:8806:900F:4100:F919:908D:514F:D439 (talk) 20:17, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Population list error
Category talk:Regions of the Americas

message: I created this category on 2007/08/06. You can make contributions by adding more information.
Your division seems biased,
It makes no sense to include anglo and latin america and not the other ethnicities.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 187.43.85.44 (talk) 04:04, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Category:Regions of the Americas
Talk:Prince Prigio

message: Prince Prigio and Prince Ricardo were jointly published in 1895 as My Own Fairy Book with a long subtitle that ends, "with an Excerpt from the Annals of Scotland, As Touching Ker of Fairnilee, His Sojourn with the Queen of Faery".
What is the relation of these books to the earlier fairy tale, The Gold of Fairnilee (1888)? 1889 advertisement; one WorldCat record
--P64 (talk) 18:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: HathiTrust provides full view of the 1st ed., My Fairy Book, which shows that it is omnibus of all three stories, not only two. "The Gold of Fairnilee", published first, is part three of the 1895 omnibus. 1895 Contents --P64 (talk) 18:54, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text:  Apparently unrelated in content, simply part three of the omnibus. --P64 (talk) 22:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fairnilee
Talk:Recurring characters in Holby City

message: This is just to let people know that the description of Leo's character is a repeat of Simon Shaugnessy's description. I am not positive of who this character is, presumably related to Lola and Ric, So I am unable to fix the  problem. Could someone else do it? Thanks! 69.28.232.224 (talk) 23:53, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Simon Shaughnessy/Leo Griffin
Talk:High Treason (1929 British film)

message: Most sources list this as a 1929 file. I moved it accordingly.—RJH (talk) 21:39, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correct year 

message: Is this film under copyright, or has it lapsed into the public domain? BrokenEye3 (talk) 07:18, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright Status?
Talk:Brumback's night monkey

message: What do I need to do to fix this so that it has the correct style and form. I am sorry, as this is the first time I have tried to use Wikipedia and do anything to contribute to knowledge —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aotusbrumbacki (talk • contribs).
:The article in of itself is in poor condition, which was why I placed the  tag on it. At the moment it looks a bit essayish, which we try to avoid. You can check Wikipedia:Your first article here for some more information to get you started though. :) -WarthogDemon 03:59, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have tried to make it bullet point and more succint. Is this better?--owl monkey guy 04:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Bulletpoints are horrible, as is signing your name on article. See WP:SIG WP:OWN and WP:MOS. Also, go look at a few similar articles, to get an idea of what you should be going --L-- 04:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Style
Talk:List of HolbyBlue episodes

message: I have rewritten this article in the hopes that we can get it promoted to a Featured List. However, I wanted to ping you both as I am unhappy with the lead section I have written. It has taken me quite a while to even compose a lead section for this article, as I am quite unsure as to what a List of Episodes article should include in its lead section. Would either of you two be able to read the lead section and let me know what you think of it so far, and any improvements either of you feel could be made? Hopefully the rewritten version is an improvement from what was there originally. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 17:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the whole article looks good. You'd do well to take it WP:FLC. The lead looks good, like you mentioned it is tricky to write a lead. The only thing I can think of adding is possibly a short sentence or two about the awards and nominations HolbyBlue has. Well done on this however, and I wish you the best. Soaper1234 - talk 18:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

text: Possibly add a photo for the lead too? I'm not sure if you would be able to find any free media, but failing that, what about a DVD cover or something along those lines? Soaper1234 - talk 18:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for your suggestion! I have added the nominations paragraph in. I will be honest, I have absolutely no idea about adding images to Wikipedia! I would have liked to add a photo to the article, even if it was just the title card, but I'm afraid I have no idea how to add a free media image. If you wished to do so please feel free to add an image, I would happily give you credit. Otherwise, thank you for your suggestion, and I will take it to FLC in the next two days. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 18:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looks good - I'd maybe just merge the third and fourth as they both look too short on their own? I've found an image of the series one DVD that I don't mind uploading for you. Don't worry about credit or anything as I'm only adding a photo!  Good luck! Soaper1234 - talk 18:33, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Paragraphs merged! If you wouldn't mind uploading the image, that would be fantastic! Thank you very much, fingers crossed for hopefully the first FL of 2018! ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 18:52, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Image uploaded, hope it's ok! All the best, looking forward to seeing the progress! Soaper1234 - talk 19:08, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  That's wonderful, thank you so much for that! I will put the article up for nomination either tonight or tomorrow!  ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 19:11, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  No worries - all the best of luck! Soaper1234 - talk 19:16, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry for the late reply. I too hate writing leads, but I think you've done a good job. Good luck at FLC! - JuneGloom07 Talk 00:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's no problem, JuneGloom07, and thank you! ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 12:15, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section
Talk:List of HolbyBlue characters

message: I suggest that rather than maintain a dozen unencyclopedic, unreferenced, in-universe articles, this page be expanded to incorporate an edited version of each character page.  I do not believe that at the present time, any of the HolbyBlue character articles - nor indeed, any of the HolbyBlue characters - are actually approaching notable enough to actually require separate articles for each. Opinions? Frickative (talk) 15:42, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: After spending some time in my user space considering how best the information from each individual article could be included here, I had to conclude there's such little salvagable material that the page best stands as a list.  A couple of the articles may be able to assert notability with a little work - I'd hazard a guess that news coverage probably exists referencing the Keenans, possibly also Luke French and Jenny Black, simply because the actors portraying them are more notable.  I'll probably spend some time next month seeing if those articles could be better developed, but as it stands, were any of the character articles to be nominated for deletion at present, I don't believe a single one would survive.  For now, I'm going to go ahead and redirect them to this page. Frickative (talk) 17:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

text: Please remember sign your posts with four tildes. The content of all the pages stills exists and is perfectly accessible, however each and every one of them was in clear breech of Wiki policy and guidelines, and had been since creation. Information on those pages may perhaps have been 'useful' (although the majority of them were either tiny stubs, or in dire need of rewriting) but it certainly wasn't notable, or supported by reliable secondary sources. Have a read of WP:FICT, and at such a time any of the articles can be rewritten in accordance with it, then there'll be no problem. Frickative (talk) 21:01, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: ETA: A quick glance at WP:CIVIL wouldn't go amiss either ;) Frickative (talk) 22:50, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal
Talk:Bruce Kennedy (television producer)

message: Marginally notable.  Won a minor Emmy.  Linked from at least one other article which is why I bothered to create this stub.  If you feel this article does not belong in Wikipeida, please do not WP:PROD it as long as there is at least one mention of him in another article, use WP:AfD instead so it can be discussed.  
Please help this article by adding the year of birth.  I was unable to find it.  davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 04:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Marginally notable, do not PROD
Talk:The Burning Court

message: I deleted the double locked-room reveals from the summary because no other Wiki Carr entry gives away the surprise ending.  I've been researching the entire body of his work and wanted this entry to be consistent.  It gives the gist of the mystery but reveals no more than might be found on the back of a paperback.  Clayton Emery  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.166.146.13 (talk) 22:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Maria Kendall

message: I don't watch much Holby, but I've seen this character in a different uniform, and I *think* she's no longer a student nurse. Not quite sure, but anyway, shouldn't the article be updated to reflect this? londonsista | Prod 17:42, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Qualified Nurse Now?
Talk:Sam Strachan

message: Reaction to his casting. — M.Mario (T/C)  19:18, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Elliot Hope

message: I've only just discovered that one of the writers on Holby is called Elliot Hope.
I assume Prof Hope is named after him, but have no evidence of this. 82.112.151.178 (talk) 19:34, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually just a coincidence that the writer and character share the same name. The character was never named after the writer. ElectrodeandtheAnode (talk) 14:50, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Named after a writer?
Talk:Lola Griffin

message: *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Frickative (talk) 13:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible sources

message: Sharon D. Clarke confirmed she's leaving Holby City on the Paul O'Grady show on 22 May 2008, and she's got a big story line coming up. DyNaMO (talk)  16:43, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Leaving
Talk:Connie Beauchamp

message: *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Frickative (talk) 12:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible sources

message: Connie Beauchamp has now left the show, as of 28th December, 2010.
Time to update the Storyline section of the Article, I think! Slightly beyond my writing skill right now...
--TermyJW - The One and Only (talk) 23:22, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Left the Show 

message: Connie's surname is pronounced as 'Beecham' as in 'Beechams Powder'  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.215.149.150 (talk) 17:50, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Surname 

message: She is only Known as Connie.  Reference removed as it had no connection with Connie.  Soap characters are not "born" so removed née. Do we want her maiden name here in her Lead paragraph? I think not. — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 12:02, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Connie is sufficient
Talk:Carlo Carafa

message: * :Category:LGBT Roman Catholic clergy	
* :Category:LGBT Roman Catholic bishops
* :Category:LGBT Roman Catholic cardinals
* Advocate.con: 21 Gay Popes, Cardinals, and Assorted Catholic Leaders, By Jacob Ogle
Carafa was a LGBT Roman Catholic cardinal. That should be sorted in cats. --188.96.230.248 (talk) 20:45, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sorted in LGBT cats
Talk:Kelsey Phillips

message: How did you make Stitch Lambert's name into a red link to create a new article? I keep trying to do that with Ruth Winter's name on the Casualty Staff Page and I keep getting stuck. I used HTML to turn the name red and then put the double square brackets round it but it did not work. Please tell me. Thanks.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lizzie Brookes (talk • contribs) 19:05, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Red Links