lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Tomb of Frederick the Great

message: This article is information taken from the original page Sanssouci which was a translation of the corresponding German-language Wikipedia article retrieved on March 12, 2006. by Trebor, and translated by him.  I  have only moved the information here. Giano | talk 14:13, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page History 
Talk:Mashadi Azizbeyov

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 07:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 
Talk:Nariman Narimanov

message: On page 129, De Waal clarifies that Narimanov's "declaration of Karabakh being part of Armenia" was made under pressure and in fact never materialised. Furthermore, the subsequent Dashnak revolt in Armenia annulled all prior agreements.
"In December 1920, the Azerbaijani Communist leader Nariman Narimanov welcome "the victory of the brotherly people" and announced that the three disputed provinces, Karabakh, Nakhichevan, and Zangezur would from now on be part of Soviet Armenia. The declaration was obviously made under duress and was not acted upon. In the spring of 1921, the balance of forces changed, and an anti-Bolshevik uprising in Armenia soured relations between Yerevan and Moscow. All previous agreements were declared void."
In addition, Narimanov expressed his position thus: "On 4 July 1921, the bureau voted to attach Karabakh to Soviet Armenia, but Narimanov objected strongly."
The quote added by RaffiKojian was taken out of context and does not represent Narimanov's viewpoint. Parishan (talk) 17:30, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: The quote was in no way taken out of context.  As my reference noted, it was taken from page 288, which is part of the timeline of events.  It was not taken from the text of the book where the additional information you quoted is found.  There was no other context to the quote, therefore it could not be taken "out of context".  In fact, I find the whole context you quote above quite interesting, and think it should all be added to the article. --RaffiKojian (talk) 18:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Quote from de Waal
Talk:New Azerbaijan Party

message: You should really put that photo of the office somewhere else, if it has to be in the article at all (what exactly do we learn from it, anyway?) Putting an image at the top left of an article really disturbs the reading experience. -- Imladros (talk) 05:48, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mispositioned image 
Talk:Quba Khanate

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Rashid Behbudov

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://azeri.org/Azeri/az_latin/latin_articles/latin_text/latin_54/eng_54/54_behbudov.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Gildir (talk) 15:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: I have deleted the majority of the existing text of this article because it was an extremely close, almost exact paraphrase of the article "With a Song in His Heart" by Azad Sharifov from Azerbaijan International magazine. The previous version of the article actually named Sharifov and placed his words in quotation marks when he began writing in the first person about his memories of Behbudov, but almost the entire article was incorporated nearly verbatim into this page. (Please let me know if I've made any mistakes -- I've never done this kind of edit before.) Gildir (talk) 15:05, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deleted copyvio material
Talk:Shakhriyar Mamedyarov

message: : Mamedyarov is not "the only player" to win the World Youth Championship twice. Three other players have also achieved this feat: Ketino Kachiani (1989 & 1990), Zhu Chen (1994 & 1996), and Aleksandra Goryachkina (2013 & 2014). Mamedyarov is, however, the only male player to have done it, and I have amended the text to specify this. Chillowack (talk) 20:43, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Shirvan Khanate

message: Isn't the Sirvan khanate established after the Afshar dynasty collapsed, how are they affiliated with the Afshar dynasty ? Aydın memmedov2000 (talk) 13:39, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Afsarid dynasty ?????? 

message: Where is Hadji-Dawud as the ruler of Shirvan? Where is his capture by the Ottomans in 1728? 89.113.137.74 (talk) 05:08, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: The source did not make mention of him, probably because its irrelevant, tbh. The background section shouldn't be that big either. --HistoryofIran (talk) 11:19, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

text: There's not a not a single mention of him being 'khan of Shirvan' in the article. Moreover, there's not a single reliable source in the article either. --HistoryofIran (talk) 13:29, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Khans 

message: Why should not Azerbaijan date template be added?  At present, the territory of the Sirvan khanate is within the borders of the Azerbaijan state.  and a part of the history of Azerbaijan.  Sarkars are of Turkish origin as far as I know. Talysh Cadusii (talk) 15:45, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Kindly read my edit summary, I never said that it shouldn't be added. However, the quality of the article shouldn't be sacrificed just to have it. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:48, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

text: I never said that. It seems you still haven't read my edit summary . --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:50, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

text: I'm sure you will manage. For a new user you are pretty impressive . Almost reminds me of someone. --HistoryofIran (talk) 15:57, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Azerbaijan history template
Talk:Talysh Khanate

message: I removed the neutrality tag, since I see no ongoing dispute, and the tag was here for 3 years already. Grandmaster 09:32, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Tag
Talk:Beef Brisket

message: Note:  suggests it may not be a term originated in the far east. Sources will help a lot. See for example: T-bone steak on how to do a "cut of meat" article. ++Lar: t/c 14:24, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

message: I propose, alternatively, to redirect Beef Brisket to Brisket. This article is unsourced original research which is frankly incorrect. (The beef brisket has been prepared as a dish for several centuries in Europe; the word, according to the Random House Dictionary of the English Language, Second Edition, comes from the Middle English "brusket", c. 1300-1350, from the earlier Old Norse "brjōsk" (cartilage).) There is simply nothing of encyclopedic value here to merge into the other article.  MCB 17:37, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: if any of the material here was sourcable, it would be worth merging. It may not be sourcable though. (it's interesting how different cultures think they invented things, and why...) If no one turns up to give sources for this stuff in a few days I completely agree with you, though. (your great cite is worth preserving on the Brisket article (if it's not already there), by the way) ++Lar: t/c 04:59, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

text: At this point I am just going to boldly proceed with the redirect. Thanks to Lar and Kotbegemot for the comments.  MCB 21:19, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have preferred a little more time to see if the info asked to be sourced actually was but I don't see it as a big deal show stopper thingie, really. It's all in the history if needed. Thanks for doing the work! ++Lar: t/c 21:51, 10 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redirect vs. merger
Talk:Brown Willy effect

message: Is this for real - didn't the Times just print an April fool too early?  I can't find any other reference to it. --JBellis 14:33, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Whoever give it this name it must have a sense of humour, but the effect which produces convergence over Bodmin Moor is real enough. Try this, which pre-dates the Times article. I also found references on a couple of meteorology forums before I wrote the article, but these now seem to have been drowned out by comments that post-date it. --Portnadler 17:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this for real

message: This whole page is absolute rubbish. There are no references that can backup this phrase. This is just relief rainfall in highland areas. The whole page needs to be deleted SuzanneKn (talk) 21:27, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Rubbish

message: For the doubters, here is the text of the original article by Jeremy Plester, published in The Times on 30th March 2006
THE Brown Willy effect was is full swing on Monday evening. This effect, named after its starting point on Bodmin Moor, describes a very thin line of showers which develops over the moor and then streams northeastwards up to the Midlands. On Monday, with a strong southwesterly wind blowing, the effect appeared in all its glory. Rarely more than a few miles across, one continuous shower stretched from Brown Willy, across Dartmoor, the Somerset levels and up towards Burford in Gloucestershire � about 145 miles. 
When winds roar in from the Atlantic and up on to the West Country moors, all the friction from the hills, trees, fields and hedges slows the wind down and makes the wind on the South Coast turn towards the North Coast and vice versa. These winds, now blowing towards each other, force shower clouds into the sky across central Cornwall. They then stream northeast. In addition, the high ground across the moors adds to the lift of the cloud and intensifies the rain. Such events can produce huge amounts of rain and ferocious thunderstorms for long periods of time if the wind stays in the same direction but as soon as the wind out in the Atlantic changes direction, the convergence is lost and the showers rapidly die out. A similar effect produced the devastating floods in Boscastle in 2004.
Portnadler (talk) 13:11, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: The Original Source
Talk:Mat Herben

message: The article is the English translation of the Dutch version. EurowikiJ 14:38, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article started
Talk:The Killjoys (Australian band)

message: The article says the band is no longer together but according to the Killjoys site they released new recordings in 2002 and have released a new album in 2006 --Galaga88 14:44, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Band still together 

message: Hey, just a thought... if this article (on the Killjoys) is 2/3 about another band called Violet Town, maybe they should have their own page. The Killjoys have been around for a while, they even won an ARIA award once (1993 I think, I've read a funny story on it - apparently it got dropped into Sydney Harbour off a boat)... this article should be on them, and a whole lot bigger. I'll have a dig around on the net, see what I can find.
By the way, 'A Million Suns' (album) and 'Love And Uncertainty' (single) are brilliant CD's, the pair of them. I got them from second hand shops a couple of years ago and I've loved them ever since. :)
Bird of paradox 16:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Killjoys, not Violet Town
Talk:Disaster response

message: Should the info in this article be incorporated into the larger article, or does the larger article need main article sections for each of the major phases of that subject? User:AlMac|(talk) 15:04, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it should remain separate. --Timoluege (talk) 10:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Emergency Management]] 

message: I'm not sure it makes sense to list them. I have worked in a number of big disasters and it's not uncommon for 100s of organizations to show up. How are we going to decide whom to list? I would suggest restricting this to the pillars of the international disaster response system, i.e. simply saying: Government authorities, international and national NGOs, civil society orgs, UN Agencies and the Red Cross Red Crescent Movement.  --Timoluege (talk) 10:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disaster response organizations 

message: I'd suggest removing this section completely as it refers to only one specific technology that is used in only one country. --Timoluege (talk) 10:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disaster response technologies 
Talk:Guild of Play

message: I am in process of rewriting the article to remove any potential for infringements Fiddle Faddle 15:01, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Rewrite is now complete.  Every paragraph has been rewritten in order to remove copyright issues.  If further work is required it can be done, though it will be hard to retain the sense of the original.  There is now  string case for this article remaining and not being speedily deleted.  Fiddle Faddle 15:46, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Guild of the Brave Poor Things

message: In process fo a rewrite to remove any copyright issues Fiddle Faddle 15:02, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: It seems a great pity that the entire story of this organistion is not contained in this article. From this, to get to that, you have to go first to Chailey Heritage and then to Chailey Heritage Marine Hospital; there is also the Guild of Play and the Guild of Poor Brave Things. Surely it doesn't need all those articles? Peter Shearan (talk) 14:12, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:Mirrored-self misidentification

message: Would a mention of domestic dogs' behaviour around a mirror be appropriate? My dog, and many others I've seen, will bark and growl at and even try to bite the dog in the mirror.
-b —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.81.139.240 (talk • contribs) 15:03, 9 April 2006
:I don't think so, this article is about a psychological disorder found only in humans, as for most animals not recognising one's mirror image is the norm. --Florian Blaschke (talk) 21:12, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Would

message: Greta Munger (talk) 15:23, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Student edits begin 

message: Should Mirror agnosia redirect here? I'm not sure how the two terms mirror agnosia and mirrored-self misidentification (whew, that's quite a mouthful) relate to each other. Is mirror agnosia a subtype of mirrored-self misidentification? --Florian Blaschke (talk) 21:09, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mirror agnosia 

message: I'm not a physician or anatomist, but I think that, in the contexts used, the word "cranial" is incorrect- the original author means "cerebral",
  e.g. "cerebral dysfunction" should be substituted for "cranial dysfunction". The syndrome(s) discussed are not- in contemporary scientific English usage- "cranial" in origin.
JDJ, 19/10/16 217.35.225.167 (talk) 20:51, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Use of the term "cranial" throughout the item "Mirrored-self misidentification"
Talk:Late Cretaceous

message: "Late" and "upper" are not synonyms. "Late" is the time term; "upper" refers to the rocks.  So you cannot talk about "upper Cretaceous time" or "upper Cretaceous events," and likewise you should not talk about Late Cretaceous chalk.
Also, this graphic, like many showing breakdowns of time designations within geologic periods, suggests that Barremian is a subset of Berriasian, when actually the six stages should be "on top" of each other - i.e., the six are sequential subdivisions of the Early Cretaceous.
--Geologyguy 15:04, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

message: AMK152 proposed in edits of 27 December 2006 a geotimebox for this article as follows:
I feel that the box information that is appropriate for the article is already in the footer, and that other extraneous information, such as previous eons, can be supplied where important, by links from the text.  I removed the geotimebox and left the footer, pending discussionb.  --Bejnar 23:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [[User:AMK152|AMK152's]] Geotimeboxes

message: The dinosaur section seems to me to be leaving out a very big group of dinosaurs that were prominent during the late Cretaceous period: the Sauropods.  Anyone else think so?  Should they be mentioned?
Sxg169 (talk) 01:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sauropods? 
Talk:Fair Play, Missouri

message: All houses in Fairplay are cheeks and need to be torn down ASAP
If you put it back please provide a valid reference.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.186.173.72 (talk) 18:05, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable Residents 

message: While Fair Play may well be a great town,  that opinion should be removed.Missouran (talk) 03:08, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geography Section 
Talk:Fenton, Missouri

message: In 1842 Archeologists found an old stone wheel with a pentastar enscribed on it, then 2 yrs later another with a bird. This bird enscription resembles a pre-historic "roadrunner". 
That needs a citation, if it is true. Readin (talk) 19:29, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  uncited 
Talk:Festus, Missouri

message: https://www.reddit.com/r/drunkenpeasants/comments/5azxcb/fucking_with_the_festus_wikipedia/
‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐁT₳LKᐃ  03:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  A very particular individual situation indeed 

message: How can this make sense?:
:The median income for a household in the city was $4,687, and the median income for a family was $2,940... About 7.0% of families and 10.2% of the population were below the poverty line...
Unless there's a statistician among you who can explain otherwise, I'm guessing the first two figures are typos or were irresponsibly edited. – AndyFielding (talk) 23:05, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: * - good eye- I went ahead and just removed that info altogether. This page is definitely a cesspool for vandals. Cheers --‡ Єl Cid of ᐺalencia ᐐT₳LKᐬ  01:58, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Median income typo?
Talk:Flordell Hills, Missouri

message: This page is conspicuously well-written yet information sparse... all numbers are there and then nothing else. Would be interesting to read e.g. about how this kind of minicities came about. --Sigmundur (talk) 05:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autogenerated?
Talk:Foristell, Missouri

message: so when i was younger me and a couple of neighborhood friends were bored so we decided to check out this big patch of trees. well we were walking through these woods and there's lots of old things from a school. however. everything was left as was. even the backpacks on the school bus. i've never been able to figure out any history about these woods but if anyone knows anything at all i would love to hear about it. thank you! 107.115.177.48 (talk) 09:44, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  weird old blue school bus and school (?) in patch of trees in the middle of westwood trails
Talk:Forsyth, Missouri

message: Here's this kind of local color intel. Enjoy if needed. --Lo Ximiendo (talk) 02:36, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Historical Fact 
Talk:Franklin, Missouri

message: The article makes it seem as if the residents of Franklin, the subject of this article, moved to New Franklin slightly to the northeast, after flooding. However, I believe that neither town was the Franklin of the Santa Fe Trail days. These are both newer towns. The original Franklin, usually known as "Old Franklin", was located closer to the river at . Several historical markers stand at the location today. — ★Parsa ☞ talk 02:45, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Franklin, New Franklin, and Old Franklin 
Talk:Fredericktown, Missouri

message: Questions: Does anyone know conclusively whether tin was ever mined on Tin Mountain, or is the name coincidental? Does anyone have a reference? Has anyone actually seen ruins on the mountain? Thanks in advance to anyone who can help...  Cheers, Terry Bollinger 03:14, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fredericktown Geology Question: Tin Mountain 
Talk:NGC 3132

message: Gene, you twice now put the abbreviation Em in relation to the distance. justifying it by saying conversion to SI is appropriate. I have a few qualms with this. For starters, there is no indication what Em is by linking to the appropriate definition. Secondly, and I am assuming it is Exameter here, nobody in the astronomical community ever says an object is somany Exameter away. The term lightyear is used without conversion factors ever being mentioned on a routine basis. Although technically Exameter is a SI-"approved" method of saying it, even if something is expressed as being 2 Exameter away, 99 times out of a hundred it would be written as 2X1018 meter or something along those lines. Those Exa's, yotta's, yochto's etc. are rarely used, especially in "common" usage. (If Em is not Exameter, than disregard above and please explain what it is.)--Kalsermar 15:11, 9 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding (Em)
Talk:Galena, Missouri

message: Please review the following to get a better idea of what you should add to this article:
# Please follow the Wikipedia USCITY guideline for layout and content.
# Please examine these great articles for ideas: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania / Stephens City, Virginia / Kent, Ohio / Tulsa, Oklahoma / Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please ensure a person meets Wikipedia Notability requirements before adding to the "Notable People" section.
Please review the following before editing:
# Please document your source by citing a reference to prove your text is verifiable.
# Please add text that has a neutral point of view instead of sounding like an advertisement.
# Please read the "Editing, Creating, and Maintaining Articles" chapter from the book Wikipedia : The Missing Manual, .
• Sbmeirow • Talk •  03:45, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Tips Before Editing This Article 