lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Stephen Southwold

message: My name is Andrew Southwold and I'm his 28 year old grandson by his eldest son. The man's life is an unbelievable story. His experiences in the First World War may have inspired much of his writing, but they also cast long shadows over the rest of his life. 
My aunt has written an excellent biography of him, that has never been published. If anyone is interested in his work and would like to read about his life and his romance with his wife, just let me know.
The reason for his name change is partly a reaection to his father as stated. It went further than that, though. His family had been boatwrights in Southwold, but his father was forced by alcoholism to work in Chatham Dockyards, a real step down. Southwold was where the young Stephen would go on holidays and stay with his aunts. A more prosaic reason is that Critten sounded both like 'Crippen' and 'cretin.' A version of this can be found in Bredon and Sons, although there is a lot of fondness shown for the father in it. 
During the First World War, poetry and prose of his appeared in the English Review, which can be found on archive.org.
:As the grandson above states, his name last name is Southwold. Nicholls 1979 Science Fiction Encyclopedia, Nichols & Clute's 1993 Encyclopedia of Science Fiction and thier 1997 Encyclopedia of Fantasy all state that Critten changes his name to Stephen Southwold (Not Neil Bell as the article currently states.)  I am amending the article. Kpulliam (talk) 05:20, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wiki suggests this book was published in 1936. I have a copy published in 1929?? 2.100.193.176 (talk) 09:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  The book of animal tales by Stephen Southwold.
Talk:John Pinch the Elder

message: This can be confusing, having two people on the same page. Split? JulieSpaulding (talk) 07:57, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Split done. SilkTork *YES! 16:16, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed split 
Talk:Religious architecture in Novi Sad

message: This is not an article about religion in Novi Sad, but it is of religious architecture in Novi Sad. If you ask every person from NS, people who had been in NS, or any well respected architect in NS ... and ask then which is the most recognized and most important religious building (for religion in general) in NS, what would be the answer, church in Telep? 
This is an article about architecture, and not religion! --Göran Smith 21:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: There is no rule that image of the "most recognized religious building" should be first. It is in the second place and everybody can see it, but if you think that church in Telep should not be first, then we can perhaps add there picture of Saborna crkva (It is older than Catholic Cathedral anyway). PANONIAN (talk) 00:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know there is no rule, but when you talk about religious architecture in NS, you can not put some church is Teelep, or Klisa, you put most recognized church in NS. WE ARE NOT TALKING ABOUT RELIGION IN NOVI SAD, this is an article about ARCHITECTURE !!! That picture can not be fist, because is ugly, you can see green tents and lamp and only the top of the building (it is better view from my building, in Rotkvarija ! --Göran Smith 00:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I know about what this article speak, but Orthodox Saborna crkva is older than Catholic one, and if you think that current image is not best one, nobody stopping you to take a new picture of church by yourself and post it here, right? And second thing, try to see how your version of the article look on Internet Explorer: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Religious_architecture_in_Novi_Sad&oldid=92823628 It is total disaster for aesthetics because image drag entire text down and make hole in the "Orthodox churches" section. So, try to think about this problem before your next revert, ok? And there is also no reason to completelly delete image of Saborna crkva during a day. PANONIAN (talk) 01:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rüppell's vulture

message: Should the page be called Rueppell's Vulture in the English language, like Rueppell's Parrot is in English. Snowman 22:55, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I have changed the heading to use only English letters of the alphabet. The "o umlaut" is replaced with "oe". Snowman 12:42, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked 16 ornithological textbooks, and every single one uses Rüppell's, none Rueppell's. The argument about "ü not being used in English" is spurious in respect of names, and the argument about keyboards lacking the ü is nonsensical (even my grandfather's 1950s manual typewriter could type ü, and I very much doubt any keyboard produced since has not been able to do so). I'm moving the page back to its correct orthography. - MPF 12:57, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: English name

message: The cited source, Alerstam, gives a date of 1973. Other reliable sources give a date of 1975. (Example - http://audubonmagazine.org/birds/birds0011.html) A web search does not seem to resolve the issue with both dates being frequently stated by reasonably reliable sources. A reliable source published in '73 or '75 needs to be located to resolve the issue. Since I was not able to locate a source published in the 1970's today, I changed the article text to "the early 1970's" since that is currently the most accurate statement that I felt I could make without a source that was published close to the date of the event. Ch Th Jo (talk) 23:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Resolved with help from Reference Desk. Correct date is 1973 per Laybourne. Ch Th Jo (talk) 18:18, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Highest Flight

message: The original report did not mention it was "above sea level" but rather "The altitude is that recorded by the pilot shortly after the impact" and I am guessing it must have been flight level (based on QNE instead of QNH); therefore, it does not necessarily represent the distance between sea surface and the aircraft (and hence, the bird). So it would possibly be better to remove the "above sea level".
It was in fact already pointed out, e.g., , where a user commented:
> What kind of height, or altitude? True altitude, pressure altitude, height above ground? In the upper flight levels, extremes of condition could theoretically yield variation of thousands of feet between true and pressure altitude, for example. – J Walters Mar 22 '17 at 2:07
--Dynamicsoar (talk) 07:03, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altitude: "above sea level"?
Talk:Golden Daffodil Stakes

message: The following red links have been excluded from this article and are placed here for reference. Zafonic (talk) 17:22, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Red links

message: Oscar Urbina
----
I can't find any trace of the 2006 running. Bcp67 21:35, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Jockeys and trainers
Talk:Kissing gate

message: The article says they can't but if a young animal was nibbling inside the "partial enclosure" of the gate and a wind came along and blew a poorly weighted/sprung example (without latches) against the field, that animal would probably escape.  Any recorded instances, published?- Adam37 Talk 20:41, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm sure that inquisitive lambs have managed to get through kissing gates. PhilUK (talk) 18:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Livestock cannot pass through, not sure as published

message: I've never seen a kissing gate in Continental Europe. Are they unique to Britain and the US? And is there another name for them? PhilUK (talk) 18:36, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Distribution
Talk:Knee wall

message: the image does not sufficiently illustrate the text. an equivalent English annotated image like this would be clearer: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kniestock#mediaviewer/Datei:Kniestock.png
Liawagner (talk) 07:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  image unclear 

message: it would seem that a knee wall was once any short grounded buttress; a sydney a sidewall butress.
Klasovsky (talk) 23:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  historical usage
Talk:Knot garden

message: Why is it called a "knot garden?"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobanian (talk • contribs) 08:26, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Most of the photos that are in the article in the moment do not show aromatic or culinary herbs but plants chosen for colour or no plants other than buxus at all.
So, is the definition wrong, or have the wrong pictures been chosen, or does the definition refer to what they WERE in the past and not what they ARE - and does the later sentence about "viewing from above" fit in if it was about herbs and not about colours? (It can, somewhat, but the whole thing is pretty unclear in the moment...) 
  
So, what did it really originally look like, what did edge the "threads"? 2A02:3035:C18:C31D:1:0:1781:8666 (talk) 03:38, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aromatic herbs? Which kind of edge was it originally? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Plantgirlie (talk) 17:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Practical Research Methodology 2024
Talk:Astley, Worcestershire

message: I just spotted the  markup from Loganberry and realised that I'm the guilty party! The fact in question came from the vineyard's own website when I originally wrote the article, but I've decided to change the paragraph slightly and cite the English Wine Producers website instead to avoid any possible suspicion of bias or advertising. Thanks are due to Loganberry for flagging my omission. - Euchiasmus 21:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Astley Vineyards
Talk:Lime render

message: Updated reference link. https://www.keim.com/fileadmin/content/Documents/Additional_brochures/EN-EN/Subject_brochures/Lime_Render___Why_Buildings_Need_to_Breathe.pdf  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.58.88.208 (talk) 05:11, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Liberty High School (Illinois)

message: Restarted this article as a stub about the actual subject of the title. --Alynna 21:44, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I've proposed deletion for Liberty High School, Liberty, Illinois since List of one-room schools in Liberty, Illinois addresses the historic schools and this article addresses the current high school. --Oddharmonic 00:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, thanks.  I didn't catch that other one, but it looks like a copy of what this was. --Alynna 06:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Laihia

message: I suspect that Markus Panttila is no famous person really.
Is there any reference? I did'nt find anything about him with google.
Maybe he is pretty unknown garage band guitarist. I suggest to delete that name from the list.
-- Polarit 21:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Tad Martin and Dixie Cooney

message: *I am currently working on improving all of the soap couple articles on Wikipedia. While I, of course, understand the fact that articles on Wikipedia shouldn't only provide plot summaries, all of these soap opera couple articles will be worked on and formatted to fit Wikipedia policy, which is why Wikipedia: WikiProject Soap Operas exists, and is why I ask other editors to hold off on nominating these soap opera couple articles for deletion. To go around and delete these soap opera popular and or supercouple articles is not the answer. Clean-up is. I will get around to fixing up this article, in which will be soon. Flyer22 22:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have updated this article to include real-world context, more specifically the cultural impact that this couple had on the world. Article is fixed up. Though, of course, can still be improved. Flyer22 11:15, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article is now updated with real-world context and notability 
Talk:1982 Belgian Grand Prix

message: The section as currently written is an almost verbatim copy (99%) of the section in the Gilles Villeneuve article on his death. I am removing the duplicate material and adding a link to the section in the Villeneuve article about his death. Theshowmecanuck (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Qualifying and Villeneuve's Death 

message: Please note that both Jarier and Cheever are said to have started 14th. If anyone has the right data, please correct that.
:Cheever started 14th. Jarier started 16th. Fixed. Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 22:26, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Jarier/Cheever

message: "This was the first ever race when some drivers took no further part after Friday, as this was the first time that any drivers failed to pre-qualify, namely Paletti and Villota."
Pre-qualification has been used before, on several occations in the 1978 F1 season (USA-West, Monaco, Belgium, Spain, Germany, Austria, Netherlands, Italy and Canada).
In the article about the 1978 United States Grand Prix West is this:
"At the start of the weekend, though only 22 cars would make the grid, there were 30 entries, requiring a one-hour pre-qualifying session on Friday morning for the eight non-FICA members. From these eight, the fastest four would join the rest of the field in qualifying for one of the 22 starting spots."  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjonni86 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not the first drivers in F1 history to be DNPQ-ed
Talk:Corfe Hills School

message: nearly a BVictuallers 19:09, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

message: This page could benefit from at least one suitable image of the school, generic CHS students, headteacher or similar. Churchillarian 21:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Operational Requirement F.155

message: In many other articles on the topic, the term "OR.329" is used to describe what I think is the same set of designs. Does anyone know more on this? It isn't mentioned here at all. Maury Markowitz (talk) 16:26, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: OR.329 was the Operational Requirement - F.155T was the specification issued to the aircraft manufacturers to meet that requirement - the article appears to be incorrectly named as F.155 wasn't the Operation Requirement.Nigel Ish (talk) 19:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  OR F.155 vs. OR.329
Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2006-12-04/International split

message: Tehran, Dec 6, Taliya News – Following the short, mistaken filtering of Wikipedia website’s English page, the said filter was removed as of Sunday.
Iranians interested in using the information on that encyclopedic site can from now on use its English pages, as well.
Mistaken filtering during the course of the past few months has found unprecedented vast dimensions, so that even the website of the International Police Force, www.interpol.com was mistakenly filtered on Saturday, according to Taliya News reporter!
Source : Taliyanews
Shouldn't this article be updated? Khoikhoi 21:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what there is to update, the story has noted for a while the reports that the block was lifted. --Michael Snow 03:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  [http://www.taliyanews.ir/en/news/fullstory.asp?n=3903 Wikipedia unfiltered in Iran]
Talk:Louver

message: could we get a better picture of a louver up here?  i don't have any that are "in the public domain"
Archtemplar (talk) 22:27, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, I think this should be mentioned. There were quite a few cars that had louvers or optional louvers. Exmaples would the pre-70 Ford Mustang, the AMC Spirit AMX or the mid-80s Dodge Charger. Does anyone know current cars that can be ordered with optional or non-optional, factory installed louvers? --188.101.135.65 (talk) 12:50, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Pankajkaptan

message: In the lead section it's stated that for louvers "the angle of the slats may be adjustable" but in the section on jalousies, it says that the "key difference between louvers and jalousies is that louvers are in fixed position." Which one is it? Can anyone verify one or the other?
Otozori (talk) 19:44, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potentially conflicting information?
Talk:Tucker Foley

message: His name is Tucker, where did the name Tuckard come from?  He is named after Chris Tucker and Axel Foley. Doratheghost (talk) 19:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tuckard?

message: There's a no refrences tag, but a refrences list like half a mile long! Huh?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Paycheckgurl (talk • contribs) 20:44, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Refrences?
Talk:Mark Jarzombek

message: An editor, Brosi, who identifies themself as a "good friend" of the subject has added a large quantity of unsourced promotional content. Also embedded bare URLS. It has been removed per WP policies on NPOV and BLP. Netherzone (talk) 01:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unsourced COI content
Talk:Mashrabiya

message: If this means a wooden oriel window, then the supposed example 
"File:La Aljafería - Celosía 02.JPG|thumb|Restored mashrabiya from the Aljafería palast (10th century), in Spain." can't be one. The etymology given from the word for "shelf" makes it clear that a non-projecting window doesn't fit the bill. Unless of course the term has broadened markedly. Anyway, something's wrong either with the definition or the example. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:25, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: If I remember Hassan Fathy correctly, the mashrabiya is just the wooden lattice which absorbs humidity during the night and cools the air during the day as the air flows through it. If this is correct, then some of the article should be removed - if they have stained glass in them nowadays, it's because they've got air-con inside! Vince Calegon (talk) 14:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: You're right, to my knowledge mashrabiya refers to the wooden laticework more broadly, it's just that balconies are a very common use of it in the Middle East; there are other examples of elements referred to as mashrabiya which are not projecting balconies I believe (e.g. wooden screens at the entrances of mosques in Morocco; and maybe also maqsuras). I just made some minor revisions but I didn't touch this; I encourage anyone to revise the the page accordingly; the reference  I just added in the lead section (Fathy Ashour 2018) looks useful for this, though only a limited preview is available on Google. Cheers, Robert Prazeres (talk) 19:25, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Projecting wooden oriel/shelf or flush stone wall?
Talk:Metope

message: Is it possible to have a diagram of a metope? The pictures are helpful, but I'm somewhat confused about what part of the picture is the "metope", what's the frieze, etc. Perhaps a diagram would be helpful to show exactly what a metope is (or isn't)? Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:27, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I will see what I can do in terms of creating a diagram.  Might be fun.  Carptrash (talk) 16:36, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Shepard Broad College of Law

message: I am working on collecting pictures of NSU's main campus, including the law school. Will post as soon as I can. Scienter 22:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

message: A minor point: AAMPLE/Online AAMPLE is not strictly a diversity program.  Most (I'd say roughly 80-85%) of AAMPLE participants are caucasian, and sadly, the passage rate out of AAMPLE and into law school is frightening bad. Scienter 03:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  AAMPLE
Talk:Moscow Cathedral Mosque

message: The translation of the mosque's name is wrong. In Russian, соборная is ambiguous. It can either refer to 'cathedral', or to 'congregation'. In the case of mosques, the congregation of the mosque is meant. Соборная мечеть is a mosque that can hold the maximum number of Muslims during the Friday prayer. 
Also, the Oxford Dictionary of English defines 'cathedral' as "the principal church of a diocese". It also defines 'church' as "a building used for public Christian worship".
https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/us/cathedral
I suggest that the name of the article be changed to correct this mistake in translation.
Denghu (talk) 14:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Changing title of the article to Moscow Congregational Mosque
Talk:Chromatography in blood processing

message: Avani,
I have a few notes on the article.  After reading I wasn't completely sure if the point of the process was to extract pure albumin, to purify blood, or to do both at the same time possibly.  I think it might be clearer once you format the article into sections, but I think thats an important thing to make sure you note early in the article.  Also, this might just be due to the fact that its a draft, but when you mention fractions I, II and III, it would be good to either link to Vivek's article on the Cohn Process or simply to quickly describe what they are.  One last thing that peaked my curiousity was in the paragraph about integrating new and old methods, where the result was albumin with lower aluminum and faster processing time.  I'm just curious about the aluminum because I personally did not know that blood contained aluminum and i think it would helpful to say why its important to remove it.  Overall though, I think once the article is formatted it will be good.  There seems to be a lot of good info in it and its an interesting topic.
Steve Lund 22:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Messages

message: The quality of the article is ok; I'd say a bit above average. Obviously it could be improved with better references still, and a more fluid read-through. The mention of a specific location in a single country seems weird to me - should perhaps describe a few countries. Right now it seems as if a single author may have wanted to focus on that country? But anyway, this is not what I am really wanting to write about. Instead, what I think would be useful is a TABLE that compares how efficient the chromatography methods are, compared to the old Cohn process or other variants before chromatography. I know that chromatography is highly popular in analytical chemistry (just look at modern HLPC devices, ultra-HLPC or rather HPLC ... I always get the abbreviation wrong). So it would be useful if a summary could be given, as a table, for a particular year (ideally 2020, aka right in this year), how EFFICIENT these methods are, including disadvantages and advantages. Yes, the article mentions a bit of this, but it would be better to have a more systematic view about this topic at hand, in a TABLE layout, since this is simpler for visitors to quickly see it. This was also my use case - I wanted to learn how much other methods improved on the Cohn process, and if you compare the articles on wikipedia, the non-chromatography articles contain some numbers which the chromatography-based variants don't. 2A02:8388:1641:8380:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 15:14, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality of the article
Talk:National Council of Architectural Registration Boards

message: I changed a minor factual error; there are three U.S. territories in NCARB not four (so I also deleted Northern Mariana Islands from the list of jurisdictions). Under the Services heading I created subheadings for Education, Certification, Broadly Experienced Foreign Architect Program, and International Practice. On NCARB's website under the "About NCARB" link they include these topics in addition to the IDP, ARE, records, and monographs. NCARB's functioning is centered on the registration of architects, and anyone who is, or hopes to become, an architect needs to be familiar with these aspects of NCARB. I also updated the "See Also" section because the architecture entities that control the laws and the framework for the profession work in tandem; to fully understand the profession one must understand the NAAB, AIA, AIAS, ACSA, and ARE.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.99.173.185 (talk) 07:25, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled