lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Oconostota

message: I see that Stalking Turkey and Oconastota were merged into the same article. According to the Encyclopedia of North American Indians, they're not the same guy. Whoever merged the two articles might want to recheck their sources. --Kevin Myers | (complaint dept.) 19:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Stalking Turkey

message: Oconastota's gravestone at Chota has the dates of his birth and death as 1710-1783.  The Wikipedia article on Kanagatucko has the same years as his birth and death.  Does the gravestone confuse Oconastota and Kanagatucko, or were they roughly the same age?
Bms4880 10:39, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: ..
Talk:Premier of the Northwest Territories

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was don't move. —Nightstallion (?) 11:37, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
* Support as proponent. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 15:39, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Voting

message: The info box for this and the other territorial premiers states that their terms are "at the lieutenant-governor's pleasure". However, there are no LGs in the territories -- commissioners perform this role -- though they represent the federal government, not the crown. So this wording seems wrong, but I'm not sure what the correct wording would be -- "at the governor general's pleasure" or commissioner's? Or just use at her majesty's pleasure, since she's ultimately head of state.
DanTrent (talk) 19:56, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: At whose pleasure?
Talk:Opechancanough

message: How is his name pronounced?
I am thinking that it is one of these.
O-pek-an-can-oog
O-pek-an-can-owg
O-pek-an-can-off
Please clarify this. 67.188.172.165 22:28, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: In school I always remembered the name by saying Opie-can-canoe. I'm not sure if it is the preferred pronunciation, but it seemed to be favored at my University. VirginiaProp 18:34, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronounced

message: The spelling Opechancanough is overwhelmingly more common and is the spelling universally found in the original texts such as John Smith's memoirs. It also more correctly matches the Algonquian etymology.  In fact, I have yet to find an original source with the spelling Opchanacanough and it only appears in books written during the 2000s. I propose that this page be moved to Opechancanough on these grounds. TheLateDentarthurdent (talk) 14:37, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I think  is right, I can't find the Opchanacanough spelling in use before the Wikipedia article was created, and the most reliable sources use Opechancanough. I'll go ahead and move the article.--Cúchullain t/c 21:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move to Opechancanough
Talk:Opothleyahola

message: I flagged a number of issues with this article, so am describing the concerns in more detail here. 
# Factual accuracy: This article views Opothleyahola mainly as a fighter against, or with, the "United States government." His supposed oath of allegiance to the U.S., becoming a Baptist and a Freemason, and fight with "'half-breed' Lower Creeks" are all dubious assertions. 
# Missing citations: Only a few statements are supported by footnotes. 
# Citation style: Those few footnotes are incomplete; e.g. "White, p. 297." And only (American) Civil War buffs know what Official Records refers to without a fuller citation. Wikipedia has a global audience. 
# Insufficient context in introduction: Opoyhleyahola's political leadership and role as speaker (not "spokesperson"; "speaker" was a title of office) for the Upper Creeks is omitted. 
# Incomplete: A good deal is missing. 
I'll try to contribute as much as time permits, but want to invite others to go ahead. — ℜob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 17:43, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Several issues 
Talk:Joseph Orono

message: At least one of the dates in this article is wrong. The subject of the article, Joseph Orono, is listed as being born in the year 1688. But then at the very bottom of the article it says: "Son of Samuel Joseph Gill 1687–1737" - his father was born in 1687 and then he was born in 1688 - only 1 year apart?? I don't think so. One of the birth dates is wrong.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeekLTK (talk • contribs) 14:24, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Dates in article
Talk:HMS Suffolk (55)

message: Please can someone check where she was built - Chatham or Portsmouth? and correct either the text or the box.  Thank you.  Also was she broken up in Newport Wales or Newport USA CarolGray 15:59, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Checked in Colledge. Built at Portsmouth; Cashmore's was in Newport, South Wales, UK. Article updated. Welsh 07:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Internal inconsistency

message: What was the practical range of the 8" guns of Suffolk? According to the article of this gun it was 26520 m at an elevation of 41° 28′. NavWeaps says 28030 m at 45°. Norfolk with the same guns was 24000 m from the German ships in the Denmark Strait at 05:56 on 24 May 1941, but still out of range. Why? --Andreas (talk) 15:13, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Range of 203 mm guns
Talk:Robert Stalnaker

message: Hmm, anyone know if this guys passes the "average professor" test?  Friday (talk) 16:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. He's probably the most well known philosopher of language currently publishing. --NoizHed 15:39, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  notability 
Talk:Until It Sleeps

message: Can someone source the song's meaning, or is this just an interpretation? -  Che Nuevara:  Join the Revolution 16:08, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Source 

message: yesss blud amaxing slang bcos i got my blueberrieess! form a man in hong kong who helped old ladies lick his cornetto.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kook1234 (talk • contribs) 19:51, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes bludd
Talk:Anuradhapura

message: Are you sure the picture is Ruwanweliseya? Somebody emailed the help desk and says "The stupa Ruwanweliseya is much bigger and there is no mountain in the close vicinity as shown in the picture."
David.Monniaux 16:13, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Picture?

message: There is a term protohistory Iron Age in the history section, does it mean prehistoric Iron Age? --Rochelimit (talk) 23:38, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Protohistory? Prehistory?

message: The article is rather fragmented and confusing. It doesn't clearly state if or why or when the city was abandoned. It jumps suddenly from describing it as an early capital to it being in ruins and then to it being a modern city. If the matter is unclear, this should be clearly explained.Paulhummerman (talk) 13:24, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite?
Template talk:Olympic Games medal table

message: or by cliking here:  
Whoever is putting this page up for deletion: I am finding sources for these articles. Give me about 15 more minutes and I will be done. Thank you. Also, please know that every time you put those tags on this page, they appear on every page that tallys that medals fgor the olympics and that is a lot. Thank you for your compassion. --Jared 17:12, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Why are the Winter Olympics first when the Summer Olympics are obviously the bigger, older event? --MrCalifornia 04:03, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I do agree with you, but I think that the overall "balance" of the template looks better with it on the bottom because it has more dates. But I do totally agree with you. --Jared 17:09, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Winter first
Talk:Dickie Roberts: Former Child Star

message: I removed some material about a lawsuit over the film being based on a previous work by D'Philip Chalmers; I couldn't find any source for it other than Chalmers' website.Brianyoumans (talk) 23:30, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed material

message: Should be named "The Dickie Roberts Show". Either that,or his character should be named The Glimmer Gang. Otherwise, not eponymous.Gimelgort (talk) 03:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eponymous sitcom?
Talk:Alveolar process

message: I think the change in the text from the [] revision to the [] revision caused a huge loss of clarity and information. --Dcfleck 16:17, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think there is a greater problem.  The alveolar process refers to bone in the maxilla and the mandible, and I do not believe there is enough of a difference to have a separate article on the "alveolar process of the mandible."  The information would be basically the same. Furthermore, about the external links in the article, eMedicine says "portion of bone in either the maxilla or the mandible" and the link to the school's website has a mandible as an illustration of the alveolar process.  This article needs to be renamed to "Alveolar process", and then information about differences between the maxilla and mandible could be included. - Dozenist talk 16:13, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: According to the English translations of Terminologia Anatomica, the terms in question are called "alveolar arch of mandible", "alveolar arch of maxilla", and "alveolar process of maxilla". There doesn't seem to be an "alveolar process" or "alveolar process of mandible", but I don't know if that represents an omission in TA, or just of Dorland's reporting of TA. At Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy, TA is one of the most trusted resources for addressing difficult naming standards. However, perhaps some structures are named slightly differently in dentistry. For now, I'd recommend that you create a new article at alveolar process, which focuses upon the compound structure you are describing, include a link to alveolar process of maxilla, and describe your reasoning at Talk:alveolar process. --Arcadian 17:06, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The second photo is TOO LARGE. It's squashing up the rest of the text but I don't know how to reduce the size due to the markup formatting. Brendanology (talk) 13:05, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Messy

message: Support the September 2021 proposal to merge Alveolar part of mandible to here; synonym, best discussed in one place; merge to the more widely-used term. Klbrain (talk) 17:32, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  Thanks for the reminder. UpdateNerd (talk) 01:33, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Standing order

message: This was inserted in the middle of the article in a most disjointed manner.
I split this off into it's own section with heading (along with
some minor style cleanup (changed to proper ordered list, etc).
I think eventually, this should become it's own article. Bhuston 16:35, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Eleven General Orders (U.S. Military)

message: This article should be moved to Standing order (Military) and the content of Standing orders (a disambig page) should be moved here. Then the plural form should be redirected to the singular form. -- Emana 07:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move to [[Standing order (Military)]] 

message: The section on Police directives has been flagged as POV for some months. I agree that it may lack neutrality but more importantly it is unrelated to this topic. 
The protections outlined in this section are either constitutional  or enshrined in legislation. They are not "standing orders" in this sense of the word - they are generally the law. They also generally apply only in certain countries, which makes this material a little specific for an article of this type.
On the basis that this material is not relevant to this topic, I have gone ahead and removed it. As always I would welcome a discussion here if there are opposing views. Euryalus 06:56, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on police issues
Talk:Jaki Liebezeit

message: As a drummer I have found this man's talent exceptional. I dare say, Jaki Liebezeit may be one of the best drummers to ever of lived. His earlier years with Can lean towards his dynamic and "fluid" playing style, his later years seem to stretch what he can do and becomes yet even more dynamic.
: It is sad that things turned out the way they did. -Ashley Pomeroy 20:17, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I believe 'Liebezeit' in German means 'lovetime'. Jaki is certainly able to keep time well with the rhythym...--HisSpaceResearch 18:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Interesting thing I've just noticed

message: There seemed to be articles about Jaki Liebezeit's death and obituaries, but the main obituary mentions Jaki's real name as 'Hans' such as this: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/25/obituaries/jaki-liebezeit-influential-drummer-for-can-dies-at-78.html http://www.spoonrecords.com/news/obituary.php 
Should we include 'Hans' as his first name?
Misterpither (talk) 20:43, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jaki's Real Name 'Hans'? 
Talk:Cross-country skiing at the 2006 Winter Olympics

message: In Russian sources, Evgenia Medvedeva-Abruzova's second surname is Arbuzova rather than Abruzova. Andres 16:36, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: My apologies. Norwegian commentators and news sources always spell it Abruzova, but a quick google search reveals Arbuzova is the correct way. Sam Vimes 20:35, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Lake Talquin

message: Lake Talquin and Lake Talquin State Park should be seperate articles: the State Park does not include the entirety of the lake, among other things. - User:Aerobird
:Ask yourself this: Could Lake Talquin State Park ever be a featured article, without repeating any of the information in Lake Talquin? If so, go ahead and start writing it. —Keenan Pepper 16:49, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a possibility... - Aerobird 16:51, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: State Park article

message: I am proposing to merge River Bluff Picnic Site State Park with this article. The picnic site does not appear to be an individual state park, but rather a part of Lake Talquin State Park, which is currently covered in this article. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 20:03, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal
Talk:Relic (disambiguation)

message: Having just fixed over 100 links to this page during disambiguation link repair and found that only 3 needed to redirect to any page other than Relic, I propose that the disambiguation list be moved to Relics (disambiguation) and that links to Relics should redirect to Relic. Any objections? ~ Veledan • Talk 16:44, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Moving this dab page
Talk:Windows Media DRM

message: The intro needs rewording. I'll do it later if no one beats me to it. Wsf 16:53, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

message: Does the "Removal" section need to be corrected according to the end of the "How it works" section?
I'd understand if there are any password-cracking techniques for static (infinite session time) file content.  But the only WMDRM usage I know is related to encrypting a video stream where a key exchange is required.  This would make WMDRM difficult to crack, no less than SSL and HTTPS.
ilgiz 03:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removal 

message: Does the latest version of FairUse4WM work with the latest DRM from MS ?
--Xerces8 09:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  FairUse4WM current status ? 

message: I read in a magazine that virus and malware authors have been abusing the DRM in WMA/V. They put fake files on p2p networks that are protected and make the user go to a site (WMP pops up a box containing the url telling the user that they have to go there for the key/codec) that downloads a virus or other malware automatically.
Im pretty sure its the DRM but if not ignore this.
Should this be mentioned?
* It's not DRM. It's a very misguided feature of windows media that allows pop-ups. You can do it in files with no DRM. 155.198.65.237 (talk) 12:08, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Dangers of DRM

message: this article appears to be giving lots of directions on how to remove DRM. step by step directions would be more helpful, but i think any directions should be removed.69.155.143.147 (talk) 18:56, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: DRM Removal directions

message: Should maybe add info on these 2 programs. Works with 11.0.6000.7000
Samanello (talk) 15:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Freeme2 and DRMDBG
Talk:List of Charmed episodes

message: Who owns the rights to the Charmed episodes? 2600:8801:BE01:2500:F45B:FCC9:DC39:5DCF (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright info?
Talk:Code bloat

message: "code bloat' is the production of [...] that is perceived " ....
Perceived, by whom? tortal
The Javascript algorithm used as an example should at least have a small sentence describing what it does. That would make it easier to understand the example. Also, for the shorter "non-bloated" version - it is commented with "simplified". Is it truly _simpler_ to read and understand? If so let it be. Otherwise one might instead call it optimized. tortal 
Removed the following, as it seems NPOV: why pick on Microsoft, when Adobe, Corel, and HP also have been accused of shipping bloatware? jkl 17:10, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quality 

message: Code bloat is a notable topic but i'm not sure if this deserves a own article when there also exist a article about software bloat in general. Both topics are also adjacent and the other article Software bloat is more factual. A other suggestion is more addition of references and info about detection of code bloat in proprietary software. --Off! 11:50, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: See Talk:Software bloat for that. MichaelBillington 12:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge discussion

message: Hi, would mentioning type mapping as a technique to avoid code bloat in C++ a good point? I can write it if so.  Dgutson (talk)
Yes, I would like to see more examples of code bloat elimination techniques.
(If the example gets too specific for the "code bloat" encyclopedia article, then the example will be moved to a better location -- some more specific C++ article or Wikibooks: C++ -- and this "code bloat" article will link to that better location).
--68.0.124.33 (talk) 15:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type mapping for avoiding code bloat in C++ 

message: A terrible examples. Turning a code into mess with a long array doesn’t mean simplifying it. Is it that Java cannot optimize\simplify the so-called complex code? 80.243.6.98 (talk) 13:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Examples
Talk:Polish Workers' Party

message: This article needs to be wikified, and some factual errors (and gramatical errors) need to be worked out. POV is sometimes very apparent (i.e. "They were cautious of communism's unpopularity and limited appeal among the Polish citizenry"; this probably had as much to do with Popular Frontism as anything else.). metzerly 17:14, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article clean-up

message: False, the PPR dominated the PPS.
Xx236 10:03, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  merged into  

message: Several sections describe Communists in Moscow, Government-in exile, Tempest. Xx236 (talk) 08:06, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The page should describe the Polish Workers' Party 

message: But its members were in Moscow.Xx236 (talk) 09:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: The Polish Catholic Church, led by Cardinal August Hlond until his death in 1948, took an anti-regime stand. - The regime wanted to control the church.Xx236 (talk) 09:13, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  PKWN ...  was officially established in the Lublin province. 

message: The lead ignores basic facts. Xx236 (talk) 07:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: International affiliation - what happened during the years 1943-1947? Xx236 (talk) 07:13, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

text: the KPP was increasingly treated with suspicion by the Comintern. -?  Xx236 (talk) 07:14, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The lead
Talk:Aufbau (journal)

message: I followed a link to "Aufbau Principle" and I discovered there is nothing about it here. Is it possible to expand this page to include it? 82.4.43.19 17:19, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: On this page, I intend to provide more clarity on the history of the Aufbau journal. I will do this by adding to the current information, providing citations to the preexisting information, and citing new sources to new information. First, I will provide a citation for the initial purpose of the Aufbau journal. Next, and perhaps the biggest contribution, I will add a timeline to the page. The timeline will contain the years of its creation and primary evolution between 1933 and 1941. The timeline information will come from the source, The World of Aufbau: Hitler’s Refugees in America by Peter Schrag. This is a reliable source because Peter Schrag was himself a refugee from Nazi Germany who has many years of experience in researching, writing, and educating about that time period. Furthermore, the secondary source itself was written as a guide to understanding the Aufbau publication and its inherent influence. It was published by the University of Wisconsin Press, an academic source, which also adds to the credibility. The timeline would include the information that already exists on the page, but it would be added to with additional information from the secondary source. Next, in the next section, “Archives, curated collections, and reproductions”, I plan to eliminate this title altogether and simply name it “publications and additions”. I do not plan on taking out any of the information there, but consolidating it into a section more focused on the publication and examples of particular issues using Shrag’s book. Lastly, I plan to add more citations to the Aufbau Index Project section using the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum website as a source. This is a reliable source because the website provides a reference page as to what the Project is, what it entailed, and what it achieved. I invite other Wikipedia users to comment on any of these changes or make suggestions on my Talk Page or this Talk Page. --Camilletoomey (talk) 22:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intended Changes to the Aufbau (Journal) Page
Talk:Italy at the 2006 Winter Olympics

message: Why does Italy, though it is the host country, get spots for the first ten places, whereas the US and Germany only get the top 3 placements? Jimbo (not THE Jimbo) 17:24, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The issue is currently being discussed on the talk page for Canada at the 2006 Winter Olympics. Sue Anne 20:46, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 10 Places?