Template talk:Nokia devices

message: Why there aren't any 4xxx phones?81.196.247.155 08:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Nokia hasn't produced any. Wibbble 22:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 4xxx

message: Now that the N800 (not a phone) is included as part of Nokia's Nseries, the title doesn't seem to work so well. 'Nokia devices'? 'Nokia wireless devices'? 'Nokia phones and other devices'? I can't think of anything better, but it does seem a little wrong currently. Hypnotist uk 23:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried changing it to "Nokia devices", but  reverted that change with no comment.  Thoughts?  Note that perhaps the change needs to happen in the template name as well, though that would prove more disruptive. --Josh Triplett 10:45, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd prefer that, personally. I see  has deleted the tablets, but these ARE Nseries devices and so I believe they should be there. I'd be happier with "Nokia devices" unless there's a compelling reason to keep it as phones. Hypnotist uk 13:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Template title

message: We should add phones from E and N series (E50, E51, E61, N70, N80, N90, N91)..
anybody against it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sedimin (talk • contribs) 08:02, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Erm, looking at the history, they were already there before the 13th Feb. Are there some missing? Hypnotist uk 13:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  E series, N series 

message: it doednt look very good with all those links that lead nowhere..... shouldnt someone add articles for  the ones with no article allready?
- kozmic|sk8r 03:43, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  shouldnt  there be articles for ALL the nokia phones? 

message: Shouldn't there be entries in this box for Nokia Nokia Series 40, Series 60, Series 80 and Series 90, either on a separate row (e.g 'Platforms') or under 'other'? The Seventh Taylor 15:55, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: But if we include Symbian, Maemo, and MeeGo, it would be appropriate to add a section for Nokia-supported operating systems. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.44.112.108 (talk) 04:47, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Series 40/60/80/90

message: 6800, 6810, 6820 and 6822 all link to 68xx series. Why have separate links for all of them? ☺  Spiby  ☻ 15:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 68xx

message: Please update new series Nokia Supernova. 203.210.153.35 (talk) 02:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update 

message: The discussion was already started with the N800, but the N900 definitely is more than just an internet tablet. I suggest to keep the template as 'Nokia phones', change the name of the section 'internet tablets' into 'other' and transfer the N800 and N900 to the N-Series section. Other solutions are also wanted.--azior (talk) 08:21, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  N900 

message: Can't we just split this template into current (Lumia, Asha) lineup and older series? It's unnecessarily long. --Lprd2007 (talk) 05:18, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: APerson (talk!) 18:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Split 

message: Virtu was a nokia division until late last year. Shouldn't their fones be included in this table?
46.115.66.30 (talk) 08:06, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Include Vertu phones?

message: For much of the history of this template, models with no articles yet are still linked despite redlinks. The point is that without redlinks it's impossible to tell automatically if an article on a product exists or not. This reduces the amount of time one would have to check manually if an article on a model exists, and removes the burden of having to update the template, given that navigation templates are not updated that often anyway. The other point is that redlinks in this template are in a minority. -Mardus (talk) 00:51, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Redlinks 

message: The Nokia Lumia 530, and Nokia Lumia 930 were made by Microsoft Mobile Oy and not by Nokia, the Microsoft Lumia 353 doesn't even contain Nokian branding, this template doesn't reflect the present climate anymore, I first changed the name to Nokia and Microsoft Mobile devices, but as this is not considered possible I'd advise to remove the Nokia Lumia 530 and Nokia Lumia 930 devices, and all other Nokia-branded devices by Microsoft as they were never made by Nokia. --86.81.201.94 (talk) 19:29, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-Nokian devices 

message: Earlier I wrote a section on why this template should be named Nokia and Microsoft devices as some devices were never made by Nokia though branded as such (thus still being "Nokia phones" but not directly Nokian devices), later someone renamed the template back to Nokia again, which is incorrect as some of these devices aren't made, produced, nor marketed by Nokia, but by Microsoft Mobile which owns the old division(s), much like how the Sony Mobile Devices template only uses the "Sony" brand for even historically Ericsson devices this template incorrectly represents another company, though I'd say that this issue is the polar opposite as what the Sony template faces due to the fact that after Sony acquired 100% of Sony-Ericsson the template was renamed to reflect the fact that it's now Sony owned, here on the other hand Microsoft bought Nokia's mobile devices + SERvices subsidiaries and this template only reflects the fact that they were historically developed and manufactured by Nokia, if I'd rename it another editor will rename it back and won't explain it either in the edit nor on the talk page, so there probably isn't much use to renaming it as why Wikipedia does one thing on the Sony template (which includes Ericsson-only devices and describes them as Sony devices) and does the opposite thing on the Nokia template (describing Microsoft Mobile Oy-only devices as Nokia devices), these is either unintended mistakes or deliberate chaos. If no-one explains to me why there shouldn't be Microsoft next to the Nokia brand I'll add it back. --86.81.201.94 (talk) 23:21, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Microsoft Mobile Oy Vs. Nokia 

message: On this page 3 different micro sd storage maximums are mentioned, 8bg, 16gb, and 32gb. 
Which one is correct? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.173.102.61 (talk) 01:55, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: storage card