lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sword of Laban

message: This article makes more sense to me as a section under Laban (Book of Mormon).--andersonpd 15:47, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmmm. I need more convincing. The Sword of Laban has other impact outside of the book of mormon. the three witnesses saw, it was held over smith at one time, and is very similar to masonic legend (hiram abif legend). Perhaps Laban should be on various peoples...., but not sure these two need combining. More thoughts behind the reasoning? -Visorstuff 18:49, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Let me retreat to the position that this article makes more sense to me as a section under Laban as it currently stands. There's not enough information here now to show the added impacts you describe. It seemed brief enough to be part of another article. I'm willing to leave it. If no one else weighs in strongly in favor of merging I'll withdraw the proposal.--andersonpd 22:24, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

text: Don't withdraw yet. You may be right, I'm just looking for more justification for now. Perhaps combining the two, redirecting this one for now, but placing the other in a prominent section is okay, but I am trying to identify is there is enough potential content to justify seperate articles? Let's try to get more comment, and I support either way, just want more convincing than they are related terms. I'm conservative. Wikipedia encourages you to be bold. Perhaps it is the right move. Thoughts? -Visorstuff 22:46, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I was going to work on the Laban article anyway. I'll add a Sword of Laban section (without removing this article) and see how it fleshes out. No hurry. If it makes more sense later we can always make changes then.--andersonpd 23:50, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Works for me. -Visorstuff 00:02, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

text: I'm thinking I might expand it into its own page in the next month or two. BenBeckstromBYU (talk) 18:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Talk:Monolithic system

message: I appreciate if articles that describe concepts or methods, also describe antonymic or alternative approaches, which is missing in  . --PutzfetzenORG (talk) 17:22, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Antonymic or alternative concepts to a Monolithic system? 

message: "Monolithic architectures implemented on DOS and earlier Windows based PCs often worked poorly with multiple users. This performance degradation is mainly due to poor mechanisms for record locking and file handling across local area networks."
: This is rather strange? DOS and early windows does not have networking capabilities. Did someone just make this up? ~:@! Crakkpot (talk) 22:40, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Meh ? 

message: I don't believe this article is accurate. Most references to "Monolithic System" that I can find on google are referring to either a Monolithic kernel or the actual compan known as "Monolithic System Technology Inc." I'm going to put this stub on VfD. Timbatron 15:54, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moar
Talk:Brochure

message: I hesitate to make edits, but should first sentence read "...a page..." and "...flyer..."??  Neither "apage" nor "flayer", which are on my READ view, seems appropriate here. Fred4570 (talk) 19:52, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typos?? 

message: I cannot endorse recommendations to delete this article, however it does need improvement.
With the rise of online retailing, brochures and catalogs have become much more important as a marketing communications device. They are a central part of a company's corporate communications (PR) and its marketing effort (Marketing).
Energy should be expended finding ways to improve this article, rather than deleting it.
BronHiggs (talk) 00:20, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  This is a keeper 

message: Add section:
=== Digital brochures ===
In the 2000s, companies and entities began creating digital brochures (typically in pdf formats). These formats allowed readers to zoom in and out of the brochure to read the text more clearly, save paper, and view the brochures on their computers or smart devices. Jwein101 (talk) 16:01, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 16:03, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 7 December 2020 

message: In the 2000s, companies and entities began creating digital brochures (typically in pdf formats). These formats allowed readers to zoom in and out of the brochure to read the text more clearly, save paper, and view the brochures on their computers or smart devices. Jwein101 (talk) 16:01, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 16:03, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Digital brochures
Talk:Wansdyke (UK Parliament constituency)

message: The map should show Wansdyke within Somerset and Somerset within England. The old administrative county of Avon is irrelevant.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.173.6.74 (talk) 13:52, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Constituency Maps

message: Why the reversion of the data I added about the party that held the seat in the past, surely party data is relavent even if I couldn't dig up the name of the actual MP?  Astaroth5 16:03, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Never mind, I figured it out, Sorry!!  Astaroth5 16:46, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Members of Parliment
Talk:Vine Street, London

message: :Sorry friends, as the nomination for deletion, among other things, shows: this is not the most prominent Vine Street. Vine Street in Hollywood (think Hollywood & Vine) is. I will rename this article. Alexander 007 20:30, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Right, this needs addressing, and fast. There are two streets under the name "Vine Street" in London. The one this article talks of is the very short thoroughfare near Piccadilly Circus, in Westminster. 
There is, however, a Vine Street near Tower Bridge and the road called Minories and Mansell Street and Goodman's Yard. This is a longer road, and surely the one depicted in the board game? 
Any replies would be gratefully recieved, as I am confused as to why it is the tiny Vine Street which is being written about here. 86.158.164.15 (talk) 14:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Vine Street, W1 (e.g., the one in Westminster) is the "correct" one in terms of the Monopoly board. Other than the initial five places which are in the (then) suburbs, and the railway stations, the roads on the British monopoly board form a coherent route around Westminster. Look at the relative positions of Bow Street, (Great) Marlborough Street and Vine Street and things become clear. – iridescent 15:38, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: There are two Vine Streets
Talk:The Holy Qur'an: Text, Translation and Commentary

message: * Disagree:  There is no need for disambiguation.  There is nothing else that uses this title that is not a book. —Akrabbimtalk 15:27, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

message: I can't find on the reference where his views on interest are, there or anywhere. He seems to have a pretty orthodox view on it (looking at the 1938 edition), I'll keep my eyes peeled tho.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wes.snyder (talk • contribs) 01:14, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies- Interest 

message: The controversies section is primarily based on material from the following website http://salaf-us-saalih.com/2010/07/24/beware-of-abdullaah-yusuf-ali-translation/. This is not a reliable source as it clearly has a pro-Salafi bias and considers all non-Salafis to be heretics or disbelievers. I have therefore removed the portion of this section that is referenced to this site. RookTaker (talk) 15:16, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Additionally, the controversies section also makes reference to the following site http://www.al-islam.org/tahrif/yusufali/index.htm. This again is not a reliable site as it has a pro-Shia bias. I have therefore removed the portion of this section that is referenced to this site also. RookTaker (talk) 15:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversies Section
Talk:Ambrosius Stub

message: There is a screenshot at :Image:Stub-stub.png. Tutmosis 19:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Page 

message: Under the "Work" section of this article, it says "His most Famous poem was Clancey of the overflow by banjo patterson".  This doesn't really seem to mean anything to me, and has random capitalizations and missing punctuation, so at a glance, I would say that it's vandalism and should be deleted.  If it isn't vandalism, could someone please determine its worth and reword it?Danberbro (talk) 16:45, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Possible Vandalism

message: There are numerous photographs of the monument to Stub in Ribe out on the web but they're all on Trip Advisor and therefore are copyrighted. The relevant citation in the Death section has low quality photos too but they also seem to be all rights reserved. I can't seem to, but if anyone can find a quality photograph of it with no associated claim, or one by someone willing to give up their claim please upload it. It would reduce the need for the description and create additional context for that portion.  
--Enneacontakaienneagonal (talk • contribs) 23:11, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo of Monument
Talk:Bret Harte Middle School (San Jose, California)

message: It has two pictures and has some information, but it needs to be expanded with more. Please Contribute. Thanks LegoKontribsTalkM 04:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

message: I reverted changes to the page to remove the school calander and list of teachers.  It seems to me that such information is unencyclopedic, and likely no more up to date than the school website.  Thoughts? --Hansnesse 01:18, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Teachers or Calander 

message: There are references to Castillero High School that seem inappropriate for this article. The statements compare the education between Bret Harte and Castillero students - and portray Castillero in a negative light. I removed those references. Bakaivar 10:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comparison with Castillero

message: I am a student at Bret Harte, and I added the abbreviation commonly used at our school "BHMS". I cannot truly support it, though I added the website at the bottom; I believe I read it there at some time. If anyone complains about it, please remove it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Danny sepley (talk • contribs) 22:15, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Speaking as a student

message: This article is in bad shape. Could someone who has a knowledge of Bret Harte please extend it. Perhaps we should delete it. This is not an article in an encyclopedia. Wikijjc 15:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Canidate for deletion? 

message: I have redirected the article to the school district. very few middle schools survive AFD anymore, the 2005 decision would be routinely overturned. Ive kept this page for historic purposes (i was redirecting talk pages, until i realized that redirects are part of the project stats for various projects)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:13, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect
Talk:Jupiter Hammon

message: This Wikipedia calendar page gives Hammon's birthdate as 17 October:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_17
Is there any basis for that claim? The current page (his bio page) does not include any birthdate.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:189:C37F:9860:752A:72B4:6814:B32B (talk) 03:24, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Date of Birth?

message: Jupiter Hammon:Getting Real
The first known African American to publish literature in the US (several years earlier, Phillis Wheatley had published her poems, but in England, not the US)... His first published poem was written on Christmas Day, 1760.
This is clearly wrong. Phyllis Wheatley was born in 1753, as Her entry in Wikipedia notes. She was only seven when On Christmas Day was published, and could not have been publishing poems at that age.
 gives 
: in which he said that while he personally had no wish to be free, he did wish others, especially “the young Negroes, were free.”
while omitting the quote our article has. IMO, both would be valuable to an article the size of ours.--Jerzy•t 16:18, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur...the first known photo of a human was a man walking down a Paris steet, circa 1840-something...Theres no way there is any photo of Hammon, much as we'd like one. I see that any such photo has been deleted; good....Engr105th (talk) 03:38, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I will be doing some digs, edits, and citations to this page in the upcoming month. 
Tairah Teneil (talk) 23:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  New Page Edits (02/2019)
Talk:Libby Purves

message: Reliable information about when her children were born would be useful, as it needs to agree with the statement about One Summer's Grace, 1989.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 14:20, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Children 

message: So it is ‘purvz’ or ‘purviss’, and no, I’m not being funny, I know her work only from the printed page, especially Punch, when we had Punch.
The latter. Grubstreet (talk) 09:05, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation? 

message: I object to a link which leads to a newspaper site which demands I pay to read the article.
This seems a sneaky sort of salemanship, and is no sort of valid citation.--2001:44B8:3102:BB00:E9F3:3229:793A:4998 (talk) 05:05, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Links to pay-sites
Talk:Larry Manetti

message: Born 1943, not 1947, as per , ,  Quis separabit? 01:30, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  I realize the above links are paywalled, except for library use, and Intelius is not considered a reliable source, so I suggest that, for now, we leave year of birth blank as 1943, 1946 and 1947 have all been cited. Quis separabit? 01:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Year of birth
Talk:Fixed assets management

message: I am not sure whether this page should stand alone or be merged into Fixed asset.  I am open to suggestions.  Jehochman 16:29, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think it can be alone. It would certainly benefit from expansion, though. Renata3 03:53, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Merged

message: Is fixed asset management related specifically to preventive maintenance, or generally for any kind of maintenance, including corrective maintenance, and prognostics?
And is there an important relationship with logistics?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.148.214.178 (talk) 17:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Preventive maintenance
Talk:Nuclear Blast

message: I think we should expand the History part of the page. I know that this page has been worked on alot but Im sure there is more about this label that is not on this page. HylAz (talk) 10:42, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Expantion of History?

message: They were originally put in the main article, but I've moved them here for convenience.
"Regarding Liquido. Someone check I don't see them on the list!!!"
"I have added the bands that are/were with Nuclear Blast Records (USA). Please add in brackets wether they have lef and if possible which label they have moved to.". -- SoothingR(pour) 16:39, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Anullst-God's comments

message: I've just Wikified and expanded this page drastically.  Any more addition is welcome, such as band milestones, etc. ± Zorkmid 02:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikified 

message: Shouldn't we at least mention In Flames in the article, who is, without doubt, the most famous band signed to Nuclear Blast? DJLarZ 20:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The article should mention In Flames as they are one the most well known bands signed to Nuclear Blast, however whether they are the most notable act signed to the label could be disputed. --Leon Sword 21:05, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Flames 

message: The link for Incubus is almost definitely wrong.  I don't think that the alt-rock band Incubus was ever a part of grind or ever signed to NB. Daedae 20:11, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incubus 

message: Lacks citations.
Can someone stick a citations template on it?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.125.148.78 (talk) 18:33, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations 

message: So it independent or major? In paragraph one, the template, and other categories). "Native" interwiki considers it an independent. On MyScpace - indi. I ask this because in the article, he "suddenly" has become a major, though that was not removed "independent label" Mistery Spectre (talk) 03:45, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  non RIAA an major / IFPI members? Or one or the other 

message: This band does not exist any more... So why the article says they are still signed to Nuclear Blast? This article definitely needs to be updated.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.1.236.178 (talk) 10:53, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Dissection
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Scalar Gravity

message: Comment If people are going to reject an article as crackpot then they shouldn't give crackpot reasons. From what I've read above it appears as if none of the commenters have a remote understanding of General Relativity or even basic A-level mathematics. I get the feeling that most of those objecting to this are interested amateurs who have read a few articles on the matter. I would suggest that those who strongly object should give references of their authority in the matter. Otherewise I can only assume that most of the abbusive commenters above are 13 year old boys who think they know more than they actually do.
I have to say that using the abusive terms of some of the above that a lot of the comments are absolute "drek" whatever that is. Some new schoolboy slang term I expect. 
But I have to say that if these are the kinds of people who read wikipedia then I'm sure the article has no point being there otherwise it is simply being read by complete morons. So I vote for delete not because the article is wrong but that it is too good to be read by such loonatics.
Honestly people like CH should have better things to do than accuse people of killing their children by reading an article on gravitational theories. CH I advise growing up, going to university, and actually learning about what you think you already know but clearly don't.
* I addressed the duplicated comment on the AfD page itself.  See WP:NPA, WP:CIVIL, and WP:AGF. -- SCZenz 18:16, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
Talk:John the Exarch

message: To the author: regarding Ioann Damaskin - please find his Greek name, and don't invent any transliterations, but stricty follow the rules for transliterating Greek names with Latin alphabet... he is a well-known medieval author and you should be able to find data on him, probably in Wikipedia, if you know how to look.
Regarding the name of Joan Ekzarh, its good that you gave all possible variations of his name [which all result from not knowing the rules for transliterating Bulgarian (written in Cyrillic) names]. The only problem - you should have given the name written in Bulgarian with Cyrillic letters!!!
Instead of giving advice, I would recommend that you join in and do the edits which you insisted on. VMORO 23:59, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Crusaders of Might and Magic

message: That was annoying.  Had to redo the Diablo disambig bit 12 times because wikipedia was playing up.  Oh well.  Just felt like saying that somewhere.  203.122.218.47 17:03, 10 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Sikon's tagged this as lacking neutrality; is this because it takes a qualitative stance on the subject matter? ERobson 22:59, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I tried to work on it a bit. What do you think about this new version? —  Shir Khan (?-"-!) — 23:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs citations for those claims about being a flop and widely regarded as sub-par. MacMoney 10:51, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I attempted to copy edit the entire article, and hopefully got rid of a bit of the bias. I haven't yet put citations in for the "flop" etc. Maybe I can find something to support it. I also edited the system requirements and put the actual technical ones in. Elsbeth0 00:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  The plot section needs a complete reworking - Talking about linear story & lack of sub-quests and even worse, talking about jokes is completely out of the Plot section (It's out of the article too) - Wikipedia is not to submitting REVIEWS (Use MobyGames or GameFAQs)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.24.20.180 (talk) 09:51, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 

message: I'd like to address the misleading/false part on this page, claiming that you can cast magic spells without using mana. You do certainly need mana for every spell. I don't want to alter the sentence though, as taking that claim out would leave the page with an inclomplete and empty sentence. Anyone care to make something out of this?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paddotk (talk • contribs) 21:16, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect info