Talk:Moleskine

message: Can anyone add more details about the notebook construction, especially the binding type. The article currently mentions the binding is "sewn", but does anyone know specifically what type -- e.g. Coptic or Smyth? I've seen mention of it being Smyth sewn (Moleskine fan blogs and such) but I'm pretty sure it's absolutely not a Smyth binding. Some commentators seem to think that the fact that the books open flat mean they are Smyth sewn, but that's not the case. Anyone know for sure the specific binding type? 70.114.180.201 (talk) 04:52, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Binding 

message: This section is unencyclopaedic and serves little value in the article, particularly as it is becoming home to little more than speculative commentary; indeed the most recent contribution specifically stated that the volume in question was not a Moleskine!
I would suggest that it is removed, Chatwin and Van Gogh are reasonable to discuss in text, being associated with the marketing campaign, the rest is superfluous.ALR 08:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, this has been a month with no response.  Given that there is no support for leaving them in I'm removing the popular culture section.ALR 18:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moleskine in Popular Culture 

message: The company website A retailer of Moleskine products says "( mol-a-skeen'-a)".  We say "/mɔleˈskine/".  I'm not an IPA expert and the "vɛnəˈzwelə" example from WP:PRON at least convinvced me that the syllabification might be right, but these are still not the same ... right?
Originalname37 19:19, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pronunciation 

message: This page was tagged as being written as an advertisement. There was no reasoning for this offered here, and I think it is a fairly neutral article, even including a "Controversy" section. Therefore, I removed the tag. --Pstanton (talk) 02:00, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advertisement tag 

message: The stationery shop in Rue de l’Ancienne Comédie is a fiction of the writer Chatwin. There has never been such a shop. I think that should be mentioned in the article, which gives the false impression that the stationery shop in Rue de l’Ancienne Comédie is a historical fact.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.104.43.77 (talk) 06:02, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moleskine and Rue de l’Ancienne Comédie 

message: Moleskine Asia says, after referencing the Milan head office, 'Since the year 2010 Moleskine has stopped using the covering material containing the Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate. This means that all the products that were made since 2010 are all PVC free.
The new materials have been tested and they are perfectly compliant with proposition 65'.
Here is contact information:
Mickey Chan,
Administration and Orders Assistant,
Working Unit Ltd.,
M/F. Chak Tong Building,
16-18 St Francis Yard, 
Wanchai, Hong Kong,
Tel: +852-2529 1163,
Fax: +852-3015-8519,
Email: mickey@workingunit.com 
NantucketNoon (talk) 00:31, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bis(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate 

message: Detour and myDetour are Moleskine marketing projects which has received international media coverage since Detour has involved also very well known artists and creative people. It is a series of notebooks personalized by artists; many of them have been donated - by the artists themselves - as a support to lettera27 Foundation. The notebooks have been exhibited in several cities (within the Detour exhibition) and lettera27 Foundation has contributed to the collection by inviting other artists to produce new personalized notebooks and to release them under cc by-sa. As far as I am aware Detour or myDetour notebooks are not on sale. Moleskine has being supporting financially lettera27 Foundation since 2007. Here are two online articles about Detour
* Katherine Brook, Moleskine Detour Book Features Artwork By Dave Eggers, Paula Scher and Spike Jonze (PHOTOS) in "The Huffington Post", 12/06/2012.
* Maria Popova, A Moleskine Detour: Inside Beloved Creative Icons' Notebooks in "The Atlantic", 10/12/2012.
Sincerely I think humankind can live without this information on Wikipedia. I am adding a clarification in this discussion page simply because ThurnerRupert is removing the session from the article with the object "board member of lettera27 promoting the sale of its own book" (before it was removed as "self promotion"). This is something which is related to a discussion about my assumed conflict of interest. I think the object of this edit clearly shows four things: 1. Now or before (with my account, an anonymous account or a sock puppet) I never put the text which is now erased on this page; 2. the motivation to erase this text is not related to the text but to me; 3. the information is not correct; I am not a board member nor collaborator of lettera27 since December 2012; 4. I am not the author of Detour or myDetour books and - as far as I remember - not even of articles related; those are not books on sale and i'm not selling them nor I have any direct or indirect financial interests or other benefit from having them mentioned on Wikipedia. I think the motivations to edit this page should be related to its content, and to what we want or we do not want on Wikipedia. As its object highlights, the edit by ThurnerRupert is related to me; I do not believe I am the correct motivation. --Iopensa (talk) 14:21, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Detour - clarification 

message: However, the banderole article does not seem to describe any appropriate sense of the word. 2A00:23C5:FE0C:2100:5403:8709:DB8F:4D49 (talk) 08:23, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "packed in a paper banderole"