Talk:Nancy Cunard

message: Can that really be the picture of a 32 year-old? Looks like she's in her late forties. Can anyone doublecheck the dates here? 101.228.13.136 (talk) 15:10, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture blurb is accurate? 

message: I have no choice but to challenge and remove the sensational and unsupported statement that Nancy Cunard died "penniless". Truth is important. In fact, her wealth at death was £14,943 (in England: administration, 17 Feb 1966, CGPLA Eng. & Wales). See Oxford Dictionary of National Biograpy.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by TranscendTranslation (talk • contribs) 00:26, 8 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests January 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:43, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Nancy Cunard, 1929.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: Perhaps I'm being a bit too prurient but I can't parse the sentence in the lead "She was born into the wealthy British upper class and became a muse to some of the 20th century's most distinguished writers and artists including Wyndham Lewis, Aldous Huxley, Tristan Tzara, Ezra Pound and Louis Aragon who were among her lovers, Ernest Hemingway, James Joyce, Constantin Brancusi, Langston Hughes, Man Ray, and William Carlos Williams." and I'd like to know what it means. It was added nearly 10 years ago. I expect with all that lot Nancy got just as confused as I am. The sentence is pretty unsatisfactory also because it in no way seems to be summarising what follows – for example Brancusi is never mentioned again at all (nor was he when the sentence was added). Thincat (talk) 23:43, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weird sentence. 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Nancy Cunard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090512131615/http://highway49.library.yale.edu/awia/gallery/loybarnes6.html to http://highway49.library.yale.edu/awia/gallery/loybarnes6.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The Times Literary Supplement of 9 January 2019 devotes a long article to Nancy Cunard and publishes a short story from her hand. 
To my mind any consideration of Cunard is incomplete without reference to this article. TLS Nancy Cunard Everybody got to be somewhere! (talk) 21:19, 17 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  More than a muse