lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Period 5 element

message: The Periodic 5 element section of the table is where the individual elements are able to each have the maximum number of stable isotopes. Although the first oddZ start out with very few, or none in the case of 43Tc Technetium, The evenZ are noted to have 
a large number. 50Sn Tin has 10 and 54Xe Xenon has nine and 48Cd Cadmium and 52Te Tellurium have 8. 54Xe Xenon only misses being stable at Atomic number 127 by a slight margin of stability compared to 53I Iodine (I=-88903 vs Xe=-88321),`which permits the stability and thus existence of 53I Iodine's only stable isotope. At the end of the period 5 elements, the stability of the isotopes is noted to be reduced in quantity for about 5  element numbers leading up the monisotopic element 59Pr Praseodymium and later with 61Pm Promethium. which has no stable isotopes.WFPM (talk) 22:25, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Multiplicity of stable isotopes
Talk:London (disambiguation)

message: This belongs in the New London disambiguation page, not the London disambiguation page.
Beowulf (talk) 00:08, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ny London
Talk:Circumscribed circle

message: I just corrected the introduction of the article, but I don't know the correct definition for polygons other than triangles.
Does anybody know? Thanks --Up in the sky 22:12, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  circumcircle of a polygon? 

message: There are multiple definitions at war on this page, apparently both standard meanings of "circumcircle".  One can talk about:
* the circle passing through all vertices (does not exist for all polygons), or
* the smallest circle containing the figure.
In the case of e.g. an obtuse triangle these both exist and are different.  Some editors understand the difference but have not stated it sufficiently clearly in the article page.  Some have tried to put one definition at circumcircle and one at circumscribed circle (is this a standard distinction?)  We need to decide whether they should be in the same article or different articles, and in either case write the page to explain the difference clearly enough that it won't be reverted.  —Blotwell 11:06, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  cleanup 

message: "circumcircle of a triangle is defined to touch the three vertices even though, for "thin circles", the smallest circle that exists only touches two vertices."
What the??? This definition is contradictory.
"The circumscribed circle of a triangle is the unique circle passing through the three vertices"
At least that is consistent
I came to this page from Delaunay Triangulation. I expected it to refer to circumscribed circles, but it referred to circumcircles. Can someone please clarify this entry to explain the difference?
"The circumcircle of a triangle is the unique triangle that passes through its three vertices." from JR Shewchuk: "Delaunay Refinement Algorithms for Triangular Mesh Generation" (2001) from http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/shewchuk01delaunay.html
I think he meant circle :(
--Aarghdvaark 05:10, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  circumcircle/circumscribed circle for triangles 

message: I agree to merge this into circumscribed circle. I think it's stupid to have incompatible versions of the definition for triangles and non-triangles, and have only ever seen "circumcircle" used as a synonym for what's described in circumscribed circle (that is, the circle through all vertices). When I want to use the smallest containing circle I'll call it that, not the circumcircle.
I just did the corresponding merge for the sphere stubs Inscribed sphere and Insphere, and Circumscribed sphere and Circumsphere before I saw the debate here. But there it was even more broken because none of the insphere pages talked about having to be tangent to all the facets.
—David Eppstein 16:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I did the merge. Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:49, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Agree with merge proposal 

message: In June 2023, the titles were swapped between circumcircle and circumscribed circle. The comments in all of the previous sections were originally at the title circumcircle. –jacobolus (t) 18:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title swap, June 2023
Talk:Panic attack

message: Future Tripping was recently created. There is a proposal to move it to anticipatory anxiety, which currently redirects to panic attack. Anticipatory anxiety appears to be a symptom of Panic disorder, but is not explicitly mentioned at that article. (will post in a few places) ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 03:09, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  expert assistance needed with [[Future Tripping]] 

message: I think putting in a few options for what one can do while in the midst of having a panic attack to help cope would be a useful thing to put into the treatments section. It has one now, but a few options would be helpful to readers. Mic20020 (talk) 01:24, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  treatments
Talk:Passy Cemetery

message: The tomb of Antoni Cierplikowski was destroyed in 2004, including the statue by Dunikowski (The soul leaving the body)Beyern, B., Guide des tombes d'hommes célèbres, Le Cherche Midi, 2008, 377p, . The grave is sometimes still shown on maps, sometimes as Antoine or Corplikowski, on the (old) official cemetery map, the grave is located in division 9, number 75. Antoni Cierplikowski is buried in Sieradz. Cierplikowski was known in Paris as Monsieur Antoine. He was a noted international hairstylist. The grave in Passy was a ceremonial grave, designed by himself, containing his right hand (in a box). JHvW (talk) 22:25, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Methodism

message: Where did methodist missionaries of denomination first land 202.4.33.179 (talk) 04:21, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Which country?KitHutch (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: The redirect Wesleyism has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  1234qwer1234qwer4 13:22, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Wesleyism]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Nine-point circle

message: A couple of animations have recently been added to the page. While I think that images are important in our articles, I also believe that they should convey some information and not just be pretty adornments. In this case, I fail to see the point of the animations. The captions are simplistic and say obvious things and there are auxilliary figures in the animations that are unexplained. I would have simply removed them, but it is clear that this editor painstakingly created them and I don't want to discourage him from making future contributions. So, I am asking other editors to chime in on whether or not these animations should stay. Bill Cherowitzo  (talk) 18:44, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The first animation does not show up at all on my old technology laptop, but the second animation ("Even if the orthocenter...") does.  I like the second animation.  It illustrates the point of the caption and also shows where the nine point circle is situated with respect to various types of triangle.  However, I think there should be a limit as to how many animations, examples and proofs there are in an encyclopedia article. — Anita5192 (talk) 18:56, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The first one (EulerCircle3) also gives me a broken image link. When I try to view the thumbnail image in a separate browser tab, I get "Error generating thumbnail. Error creating thumbnail: Error code: 137" So I think there is a problem with the image, not with your laptop. (The image looks just fine when I open its page in Wikimedia commons, but the Wikimedia software is somehow unable to produce a cut-down version for our article.)—David Eppstein (talk) 19:25, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent animations
Talk:Princess Charlotte, Duchess of Valentinois

message: Her cession of claims to the throne is inconsistent with Albert II, Prince of Monaco, that only male descendants of the reigning prince were eligible (unril 2002) to succeed Septentrionalis 19:14, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: cession

message: Wouldn't she have been Hereditary Princess of Monaco from 1922-44?
Her father (Louis II) didn't succeed to the throne until 1922. From 1889-1922 Louis was Hereditary Prince (during his father Albert I's reign) GoodDay 23:48, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hereditary Princess of Monaco, 1919-1944? 

message: …even before he succeeded his father as Prince Louis II the principality sought to forestall a succession crisis, anticipating that its neighbor, the Republic of France, might take it amiss if the throne fell someday to Louis's legal next of kin.
:Don’t you mean someone who was not legal next of kin? Valetude (talk) 11:30, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing
Talk:Slapstick

message: I thought a slapstick was a device that looks like a blunt instrument that could inflict serious injury, and makes a loud noise when swung, with which one performer appears to be brutally beating another, Three-Stooges style.  And that the genre of comedy derives its name from that.  Shouldn't that be given as the first definition, before the derived meaning of the word "slapstick" is discussed?   -- Mike Hardy
It is. But very few people know that meaning of the word. So most readers will come here looking for the genre. We could move up the origin of the word to the 1st paragraph.  -- Tarquin
The article now seems to be fairly clearly about the genre, with the section about the device labelled "Origin" ... until the section about the 20th Century Fad ... here suddenly "slapstick" is being used to refer to the physical device where in immediately preceding paragraphs the word is understood to be referring to the genre. - Ben Robinson  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.193.128.51 (talk) 22:20, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slapstick instrument 

message: The idea of "neo-slapstick" for "Jackass", et al, might be a bit problematic.  It seems definitional to the idea of slapstick that the violence appreciated by the audience through laughter is understood to be humorous, in part, because of its ultimately harmless nature.  For example, we are licensed to laugh at a frying pan in the face because we don't actually believe that one person hit another full-on in the kisser with a hunk of cast iron.  The bigger stuff (e.g., having an anvil dropped on one's head) is reserved, for this reason, to cartoon.  The problem with the "Jackass" example, to my mind, is that its humor depends upon a style of public censure and laughter almost completely at odds with the traditional understanding of slapstick.  Thoughts?   --Patchyreynolds 9 July 2005 15:16 (UTC)
I can't see the problem. Interchange a definition resting on our belief in it all being staged with a definition resting on our belief that all action is acted out with the participants full consent. 77.105.195.3 (talk) 21:10, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Neo-slapstick problematic 

message: I think visual pun merits an entry of its own, rather than being redirected here, and then glossed over. I say this because I think something should be said about the visual punning in Dutch gable stones, and will illustrate this when I'm next in the right place with a camera. 
For now I will add a note to pun
TobyJ 09:28, 23 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Visual pun 

message: Check the bottom of Modern Criticism— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.160.225.11 (talk • contribs) 06:36, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandals! 

message: The article is muddied by the fact that it's half about the actual slap-stick device itself, and half about the comedy genre named for it. They should have separate articles. 2600:1015:B10D:20D0:6BC8:D00F:57CA:202B (talk) 18:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Propose split.
Talk:Anthony Franciosa

message: He was almost always billed as "Tony Franciosa" at the height of his career, very rarely as "Anthony Franciosa."  We should change his article name to Tony Franciosa to avoid confusion.  We currently have this backwards.  Jump Forward Immediately (talk) 23:46, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Fame Is the Name of the Game

message: I felt the comment about stunt crew abuse needed some context (especially in the current climate); it appears that a young Franciosa was not good at pulling punches or deliberately didn't pull them.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indieshack (talk • contribs) 16:21, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Stunt Crew Abuse

message: I read he was friend with Martin Luther King and he was an activist, do you have something about it? --2.226.12.134 (talk) 07:40, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  civil rights 

message: Franciosa was billed as Tony rather than Anthony for practically the entire peak of his career, including almost all the movie posters. It would be good for clarity if his name title could be changed to "Tony Franciosa" for the Wikipedia article about him.  George Raft Has Risen From the Grave (talk) 20:15, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: After all, Name is the Game of the Fame.  George Raft Has Risen From the Grave (talk) 20:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: @George Raft Has Risen From the Grave mmnmn?::.mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.mmmmm in 70.112.67.74 (talk) 16:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Tony or Anthony?
Talk:Intermediate circular orbit

message: I write space policy for the US Air Force.  I work with Air Force Space Command and NASA on a regular basis.  I've never heard of / read about ICO outside of Wikipedia.  
MEO is by far, the most common name for orbits between LEO and GEO (technically GSO is more apt, but GEO is more common as most GSO satellites are in near GEO orbits).
I would suggest that links to ICO get redirected to MEO, and not the other way around.  Sure, cross reference the two, but you ask any engineer/scientist who works with satellites and they'll tell you that MEO is the term they would use.
Check out the documents on the Inter-Agency Debris Coordination Committee's webpage.   —-Taka2007 05:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It seems to me that ICO would be a subset of MEO (MEOs are not all necessarily circular). If so, it would make sense to move this article to MEO. —Fleminra 00:56, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Concur.  MEO can mean a lot of things. —Taka2007 05:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  ICO... never heard of it
Talk:Luigi Dallapiccola

message: Mario Ruffini
“L'opera di Luigi Dallapiccola. Catalogo Ragionato”
Presentation by Dietrich Kämper
Milan
Edizioni Suvini Zerboni
2002
544 Pages
Huh? - Zoe
: may be better. Schissel | Sound the Note! 14:01, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: Prigoniero is indeed correct, though some reference might have been provided (since Dallapiccola might have been opting for a truncated spelling himself, as has been known to happen). Here's one of many -  BBC Opera On 3 (from 2004). (Articles on the work also use the spelling with two 'i's, by a factor of some 500 to 1 in google hits; I suspect without knowing for certain that a check of the manuscript would confirm, though it's ultimately worth knowing, on the Ivesian "The wrong notes are right!!!" principle which applies of course even to more conservative composers as Mr. Dallapiccola!) Schissel | Sound the Note! 13:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opera spelling 

message: Just a thing. It is commonly acknowledged now that the first Italian composer to write in the twelve-tone idiom was Giacinto Scelsi, even before Dallapiccola. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.16.68.222 (talk) 11:34, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dodecaphony in Italy
Talk:Seigneur of Sark

message: There really should be some discussion as to who and what the Seigneur really is, and something, even a tiny bit, about Sark.  -- Zoe
Numbering the list
I note that Susan Le Pelley is listed as the 10th Dame of Sark. To me this implies that there were 9 dames before here, when in fact she was the first female "ruler" of Sark.
Is there a better way of recording them as 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc but in a way that doesn't confuse me? Twoquidtunes 20:29, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:Sonic Team

message: Just a heads-up, in his Twitter goodbye today, Aaron Webber (who's moving from PR to a different position) said thanks "to all the employees of SEGA and Sonic Studio", not Sonic Team. It may not mean anything, but it might be something we want to keep our eyes on. JOEBRO64 19:12, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sonic Studio" 

message: There’s an office complex in Novosibirsk, Russia which containsan “IT company” named “Sonic Team” on Russian map websites (i.e. regional equivalent to Google Maps). Obviously this doesn’t mean anything, but the listing contains photos of an office interior. Sonic Frontiers suspends developed in Russia, linked to sanctions behind Russian invasion of Ukraine. User:SonicTeamRussia54 64 13:44, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Sonic Team in Russia" 
Talk:Knuckles the Echidna

message: Please add redirect "Do you know da wae" or "Do you no da wae" for section "Ugandan Knuckles meme" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:201:c803:17fe:f4de:fdab:ab8f:a8e (talk) 04:30, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Do you know da wae" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: so uh knuckles hasa repappeared in the Sonic th hedgehog movie 2  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 49.205.99.4 (talk) 06:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  2022 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Unknown from M.E and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 28#Unknown from M.E until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 18:17, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Unknown from M.E" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Mecha Knuckles and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 28#Mecha Knuckles until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 18:20, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Mecha Knuckles" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]] 

message: An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect :Chuckles The Echidna and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 28#Chuckles The Echidna until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Pizzaplayer219TalkContribs 18:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Chuckles The Echidna" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Violin Concerto (Berg)

message: * What happened to the sound samples? since they are removed shouldn't that section also be removed then?
** Done. —ShaneCavanaugh 07:16, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sound Samples 

message: well, neither is an idiom, exactly.  I think that what was written there may be a misinterpretation of some statements Schoenberg made about octave doublings in twelve-tone music that made their way into an essay that's been reprinted in Style and Idea. I'll go check. Schissel | Sound the Note! 23:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "that the two idioms are..." 

message: I don't suppose anyone besides me cares enough to have noticed that the diagram *doesn't actually show 'P-3'*... Pfistermeister (talk) 16:21, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, you are soo caring and concerned...I can tell by your tone. Hyacinth (talk) 01:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry to ask, but what is P-8? R, I, and RI I know, but I can't figure out how "P-8" is derived from the row... -- megA (talk) 16:34, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  'lament melody and its construction from the pitches of RI-5 and P-3'... Yeah, right... 

message: How so? Hyacinth (talk) 01:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Dubious

message: Why and where does this article contain original research? How should it be cleaned up? Hyacinth (talk) 13:15, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Whether it's OR is debatable, but there are a number of statements without supporting references. The first sentence after the lede will do as an example: "The piece stemmed from a commission from the violinist Louis Krasner". That's fine to kick off an article, but a mature WP needs to find support for such statements. I've used the "More footnotes" template as that seems more appropriate than the OR template. GFHandel ♬  18:54, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Original research

message: The wikipedia page on Alban Berg does not include a heading for 'Douglas Jarman'; accordingly, the in-page-jump hyperlink in the line, "That was finally done in the 1990s by Professor Douglas Jarman, Principal Lecturer in Academic Studies at the Royal Northern College of Music, Manchester" links only to the Alban Berg page as a whole.  This may seem like a good idea, but it comes-off as an error when the reader follows the link and, so to speak, ends up nowhere in particular. 76.64.48.166 (talk) 17:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  No referent for Jarman hyperlink