lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:43rd Academy Awards

message: Why do the technical awards just list the winners - is there a reason for this, or have people just not gotten around to adding the nominees (they are on the page for each award)? I assume it's the latter, because they are all listed for early awards and the modern ones. It just seems like the late 60s - 70s are lacking them. --76.210.62.17 (talk) 03:03, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi there. As you can see, I've updated these pages to table format, and all nominees for every categories are listed. I'm in the process of doing this for all those incomplete 60s/70s pages.Nora nettlerash (talk) 16:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Technical Awards 

message: List of winners and nominees converted to the more attractive table layout, part of my ongoing project to improve these pages. See talk for the 38th awards for more details. Nora nettlerash (talk) 16:45, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updating to table format 

message: The article says that Don Rickles hosted the event. But this list here says that the show had no host (like the previous two ceremonies): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Academy_Awards_ceremonies
I can also find no mention of a hosting gig on Don Rickles's wikipedia page.
Maybe someone who is "in the know" could correct whichever information is incorrect? Otto von B. (talk) 13:05, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Host?? 
Talk:45th Academy Awards

message: Drat!  I was looking for a list of the nominees for Best Song.  -ErinHowarth (talk) 23:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The nominees for Best Song were not announced until a few weeks after all the other nominations were announced. See  and .  Mathew5000 (talk) 10:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete list of nominees 

message: Chaplin was usually credited as Charles Chaplin for work other than acting. I believe he would have been credited as Charles Chaplin for the Limelight score. Is it possible to confirm that the Academy actually used Charlie in the nomination? 68.146.52.234 (talk) 04:26, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I double-checked.  The official Academy Awards web-site lists Chaplin as "Charles".   Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 19:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charlie or Charles? 

message: The table of winners and nominees should reflect the fact that there was a sixth nomination for Best Original Dramatic Score.  It was for Nino Rota.  However, that nomination was later rescinded or revoked by the Academy.  The official Academy web-site states as follows:  
: [NOTE: THIS IS NOT AN OFFICIAL NOMINATION. The Godfather score, composed by Nino Rota, was originally announced as one of the five official nominees. It was later pointed out that portions of the score and the main theme were composed by Rota for his score to the 1958 Italian film, Fortunella. The Music Branch was given this information and re-balloted to determine the fifth nomination. The list of six films they were to choose from were the remaining five of the top ten preliminary listings, plus The Godfather score. The results of the re-balloting was that the fifth nomination became Sleuth, composed by John Addison.]. 
Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 19:39, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Best Original Dramatic Score 

message: It is a little "suspicious" that Chaplin got the Limelight nomination the year after his honorary Oscar since Limelight was finally shown in L.A. Is it known if the L.A. screenings were a direct result of renewed interest in Chaplin after he got the honorary award? And is this a scenario that could still happen, or has this loophole been closed so only recent films can be nominated? 23skidoo (talk) 13:52, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: That loophole's long been closed. Nowadays, films that premiere outside of L.A. have until the following year to premiere there to be nominated for any ceremony. CRBoyer 18:42, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Chaplin's nomination
Talk:46th Academy Awards

message: The article for the 47th Academy mentioned the streaking incident happened that year. So does this article. He obviously couldn't have streaked two years in a row with David Niven present and making the exact same joke. So which year did the streaking incident really take place? 24.189.90.68 (talk) 02:42, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed this section from this page.  Since Oscars.com references the 47th Awards as the date for the incident, I'll trust their accuracy.Kp.murphy (talk) 14:52, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Oscars.com does not reference this incident.  However Oscars.org, the official Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences website does in fact reference it and confirms it is in fact the 46th Academy Awards.--Oakshade (talk) 21:38, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  The streaking incident 

message: I updated this to table format today, something I am aiming to do for all Oscar pages 1965 - 1976. See Talk:38th Academy Awards for more details. PS - Thanks to the anonymous user who did 44th and 45th ceremonies during December. Nora nettlerash (talk) 15:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Table format 
Talk:47th Academy Awards

message: Wait... the article for the 46th Academy mentioned the streaking incident happened that year. So does this article. He obviously couldn't have streaked two years in a row with David Niven present and making the exact same joke. So which year did the streaking incident take place? 24.189.90.68 (talk) 02:40, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, I doubt he streaked twice with the same presenter haha. well Oscars.com had it under the 47th annual Academy awards. Moment 5 That was my source. hmm interesting.  Moonraker0022 (talk) 18:37, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text:  Agreed.  I'm not really sure what the deal is with this.  I had originally removed the sentence from this atricle since David Niven wasn't listed as a host in the 46th page, but since Oscars.com has it listed from the 47th, I'll revert and then remove it from the 46th page.Kp.murphy (talk) 14:50, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The streaking incident 
Talk:48th Academy Awards

message: "Cuckoo's Nest" & "Silence" took the Big Five, but what was the next film to take the Big Four (minus Screenplay)?  TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 16:47, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sweep weak?
Talk:Midland Railway

message: The 'Innovation' section seems to require modification.  Firstly, in the 1870s, all main lines had enclosed coaches for 3rd class.  They normally had 'bare board' seats, but did at least have opening windows.  From at least the 1850s, it was legally required that passengers be carried in enclosed vehicles.  Open vehicles may have been used on some light or narrow-gauge lines, but their use was illegal on most lines.  Secondly, I cannot be certain, but I believe that 1st class fares were reduced to 2nd class levels to attract more passengers.  Most 3rd class coaches were upgraded with padded or sprung seats to 2nd class standards, but some received a major rebuild to 1st class standards.  It also removed an unusual coach design, the brake tri-composite, a coach which contained all three classes and a luggage compartment for use on through-workings between branch and main lines.  Before I add this to the article, I need sources to be confirmed.  The last 3-class train in Britain was the Golden Arrow Pullman, which connected with 3-class French trains, where the three-class structure ended in 1956.  See that article for more details.--86.164.168.150 (talk) 10:42, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Innovation section 

message: I have a mystery ledger and at the moment unable to unlock it.
A lot of history.
Happy to send photos. Woodynorfolk (talk) 10:35, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1800s mystery ledger 

message: Does anyone think a minor addition to the main page on this topic, would be of interest? https://www.flickr.com/photos/terry_browne/44559366181/ Terry nyorks (talk) 16:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: It's © All rights reserved. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:25, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Redrose64, just because is marked as such on Flickr doesn't make it so. That work from 1922 will now be out of copyright and does not belong to the uploader there. Rcsprinter123 (confabulate) 00:36, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Midland Railway Map at grouping into the LMS, in 1922
Talk:Luxembourgish Americans

message: Although 'Luxembourgian American' is the logical name for this ancestry group, the actual name is 'Luxembourg American'.  See the 'Luxembourg American Cultural Society', etc.  Although the result is slightly skewed by the existence of the Luxembourg American Cemetery and Memorial (final resting place of General Patton), Google gives 13,200 hits for 'Luxembourg American' and only 79 for 'Luxembourgian American'.  That's conclusive enough to move it back to its original position. Bastin 12:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: I'm under the impression that there are several subgroups among Luxembourgers, and thus Luxembourg Americans. Perhaps something can be mentioned about this in the article? Gringo300 (talk) 23:44, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: subgroups?

message: This should be in here https://www.loc.gov/rr/european/imlu/luxem.html Victor Grigas (talk) 01:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Excellent reference 

message: https://www.luxtimes.lu/luxembourg/the-luxembourgers-who-left-for-america/2517760.html Victor Grigas (talk) 15:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  More
Talk:Luxembourg National Division

message: I have several questions about the top-flight league in such a small country.  Are these teams all fully professional?  If not what is the distribution between professional & semi-professional teams?  What are the salaries of the players?  Do any teams play in other countries, like the Welsh club Cardiff City F.C. plays in an English league?  Does this league or the Luxembourg Division of Honour have any amateur teams?  How does this league compare to various other leagues, i.e. what level of the English football league system is this league strength best compared to?  Kenallen 16:26, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Questions
Talk:51st Academy Awards

message: There are two short footnotes w/o a source. How should these be handled? —¿philoserf? (talk) 03:01, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Davis short footnotes
Talk:Frinton-on-Sea

message: Re-written in a more appropriate tone --Ilikeyourdorkiness 14:03, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]
Talk:58th Academy Awards

message: Should this page mention the actress who died during the ceremony? wherethetacos (words | deeds) 20:54, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep, seems like a worthwhile thing to note, and it’s already sourced on her page (not that I’ve checked the source). — HTGS (talk) 21:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sarah Cunningham
Talk:Sarah Alexander

message: How did her name become "Sarah Alexander"?  A marriage?  Grover cleveland 06:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: There reads: Sarah Alexander (née Smith; born 3 January 1971), which implies her surname is currently "Alexander", and according to the article, this is not the case. 88.114.246.209 (talk) 19:31, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name change #2 

message: She was in the BBC series People Like Us. The Estate Agent episode. 84.68.254.13 (talk) 15:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  She was in the People Like Us episode "The Estate Agent"
Talk:61st Academy Awards

message: The award (Who Framed Roger Rabbit) at nominees (Die Hard, Willow) are missing from the table.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raronow (talk • contribs) 16:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Missing the Sound Editing award 

message: How many Oscars did Who Framed Roger Rabbit won and nominated (please don't combine both the winning and nominations into one) and how many Annies did Who Framed Roger Rabbit won and nominated (again, please don't combine the winning and nominations into one)? 24.180.56.157 (talk) 20:33, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question about ''Who Framed Roger Rabbit'' 
Talk:63rd Academy Awards

message: Who introduced the "I'm Checking Out" number on the 63rd Academy Awards? Billy Crystal or someone else? --Thomas Mulligan (talk) 16:14, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Reba McEntire number
Talk:68th Academy Awards

message: Who introduced Lyle Lovett and Randy Newman performing the Toy Story song at the 68th Academy Awards? --Thomas Mulligan (talk) 18:22, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  "You've Got a Friend in Me"
Talk:Dalal Street

message: As Dalal Street is famous worldwide, likewise its discussion forums to discuss the dalal street news/view/stocks and even stock tips & hints are being discussed on the forums.
One of the leading forum I have been using is http://www.dstreetdirect.com (formerly http://dalalstreet.realpaisa.com)...
Whose description says
http://www.dstreetdirect.com is an online forum for discussing stocks commodities & forex with traders and investors all over the world.
The definition of Dalal Street, in my opinion will remain incomplete without Dalal Street Forums.
Thank You...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.162.199.179 (talk) 23:28, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dalal Street Forums - Discuss Stock Markets, Futures, Commodities And Forex
Talk:71st Academy Awards

message: "Affliction, Bunny, Central Station, Election Night, Elizabeth, Gods and Monsters, The Last Days, The Personals, The Prince of Egypt and What Dreams May Come were all nominated in at least two categories." This statement is false. Bunny, Election Night, The Last Days and The Personals were nominated only in one category. Kumagoro-42 (talk) 13:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  False statement 

message: Hmm...strange that there's nothing here about the controversy around Kazan being honored. There was quite a bit of angry press from prominent Hollywood personalities, and a number of those in attendance refused to applaud or otherwise celebrate him. It was one of the most anticipated moments of the show because of the simmering anger. Grandpallama (talk) 12:34, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Elia Kazan
Talk:72nd Academy Awards

message: Why is there a "trivia" section for this article? See WP:TRIV and Wikipedia:Layout for guidance and policies, as well as other articles on the various Academy Awards ceremonies, which do not include such a "trivia" section; also see: WP:NOT, which links to Wikipedia:Trivia sections.  Thanks. --NYScholar (talk) 20:23, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Edited out; still visible in preview mode for further work. --NYScholar (talk) 20:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia

message: Could be in a separate Wikiquotes page w/ cross link at end of page, where appropriately placed; needs references; Reference section?
:Edited out; still visible in preview mode for further work. --NYScholar (talk) 20:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Notable quotes

message: Missing subsection for this award (see Academy Honorary Award).  --NYScholar (talk) 20:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Honorary Award

message: When were the nominations announced?  The article gives the date that the winners were announced, but it doesn't include the date that the nominations were announced. -162.6.97.3 (talk) 23:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominations 

message: Footnotes 25, 31 and 37 all refer to Pond 2002. Other references are to 2005 and the listed book in the biblio is 2005. Is this a separate edition, or are the 2002 references wrong? - SchroCat (talk) 10:31, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Errors 
Talk:Dime Store Magic

message: As discussed on the talk page for Bitten, this section seems unnecessary. It contains no links that are not either elsewhere in the article or that cannot be found by going to the author or series page (both linked). As no objections were raised there, I have also removed it from this article. Silverthorn 11:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See Also Section
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biography/Collaboration/Archive 2

message: I wonder if there is enough interest to support this. Maybe it would be better to work through already active collaborations for a while. Maurreen 14:30, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You're probably right! I've added the active collaboration nominees you posted on the project talk page.... -plange 16:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Thank you-- will make a section just for you guys on this page plange 14:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Enough interest?
Talk:Stolen (Armstrong novel)

message: As discussed on the talk page for Bitten, this section seems unnecessary. It contains no links that are not either elsewhere in the article or that cannot be found by going to the author or series page (both linked). As no objections were raised there, I have also removed it from this article. Silverthorn 11:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See Also Section
Talk:Haunted (Armstrong novel)

message: Should "Nix" be linked to "Neck_(water_spirit)"?  I'm not sure how much Armstrong's "Nix" matches the actual mythological water spirit, and am not aware of any definitive source that she based it on that concept, except a description in the book itself (p 31): "In German folklore Nix is a mischievous temptress spirit .." Jimw338 (talk) 20:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we link "nix" to "Neck_(water_spirit)"?
Talk:Broken (Armstrong novel)

message: As discussed on the talk page for Bitten, this section seems unnecessary. It contains no links that are not either elsewhere in the article or that cannot be found by going to the author or series page (both linked). As no objections were raised there, I have also removed it from this article. Silverthorn 11:19, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: See Also Section
Talk:Butterfly kick

message: User: Shenshuai wants to know if there can be a such thing as a 2520 Twist? --68.84.190.3 14:37, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: --Why do the pictures keep disappearing? If there's a legitimate reason I'll understand. But the pictures themselves have not been deleted, and the people that uploaded them have given them the appropriate licensing tags. They serve a purpose to the article and illustrate the kick which is the topic of the article. 129.7.127.83 17:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Pactio_kiss for creating those pictures/movies. --MarSch 15:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I found the following information  towards motives of repeated removals of graphics by User:Wonphi --MarSch 15:47, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures
Talk:Augustus William, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel

message: The page for this individual states that he was married three times and was childless.  I would like to find the names of his three wives but have had no luck so far.  Any helpo would be appreciated.
: I added it. Chl 02:50, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Wives

message: Should the article not be Augustus William, Duke of Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel?  I find in contemporary English decoments be was known as the Duke of Wolfenbüttel.  Peterkingiron (talk) 15:23, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: WP:CAT/R#Sexuality For a dead person, there must be a verified consensus of reliable published sources that the description is appropriate.
For example, while some sources have claimed that William Shakespeare was gay or bisexual, there is not a sufficient consensus among scholars to support categorizing him as such. Similarly, a living person who is caught in a gay prostitution scandal, but continues to assert their heterosexuality, can not be categorized as gay. 
Categories that make allegations about sexuality – such as "closeted homosexuals" or "people suspected to be gay" – are not acceptable under any circumstances. If such a category is created, it should be immediately depopulated and deleted. Note that as similar categories of this type have actually been attempted in the past, they may be speedily deleted (as a G4) and do not require another debate at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. 
We need reliable sources for category claims.  It may well be that such sources are indeed available and you can list them in the article - but if not, then who is saying that these people fit the bill?  Just deciding that you think they fit the description is Original Research - and that's not allowed here.  I need to see a few reliable little blue number in each categorization that links to a reference document that can be examined to confirm Basic Academic rigour. User: Pgarret (talk) 10:12, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adding sexual orientation category to this biography is a [[WP:CAT/R#Sexuality]] violation
Talk:Community of interest

message: I am interested in Internet communities, which by their nature are communities of interest, but different enough in my opinion to warrent their own article. If anyone reads this, please give me some advice. Corrupt one 00:18, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Since there hasn't been a page formed for "online communities" I'm going to add some info on that. Alclark710 (talk) 08:30, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Internet communities
Talk:Ynys Llanddwyn

message: I've just discovered this article and much of the text sounds very familiar to me. In particular, the text in the sections about Dwynwyn, the history and natural history is taken almost verbatim, with a few minor changes of wording, from a web page I wrote about Llanddwyn back in 2000. You can verify this by looking at the www.archive.org copy of my web site from August 2000 at http://web.archive.org/web/20000829173542/www.anglesey-history.co.uk/places/llanddwyn/index.html. The current page is at http://www.anglesey-history.co.uk/places/llanddwyn/index.html.
I'm not happy about the use of my copyrighted material without permission or attribution. Also, this is clearly against Wikipedia policy.
I'm new to Wikipedia and thus am reluctant jump in head first and have the page removed or zap all the sections that are copied from my site, but I do not want my material to remain here without permission or attribution.
Any comments are welcome while I consider my options. Thanks.
Warrenkovach 14:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It appears that you have taken peremptory action yourself although with a less than honest edit summary.  It is generally inadvisable to hide significant text deletions behind a text move to another page.  Velella  Velella Talk   22:06, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Opening heading

message: This page can easily accommodate the two sentences on St Dwynwen's Church located on Ynys Llanddwyn. Manannan67 (talk) 22:51, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Agree. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Kettering Borough Council

message: Most of the articles on Kettering councillors have been nominated for deletion:
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pat Anderson
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maurice Bayes
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Brace
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Civil
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Corazzo
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Freer
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Groome
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Lamb
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bill Parker (politician)
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Smith-Haynes
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Titcombe
*Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Whyte
Timrollpickering 14:43, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Councillor articles for deletion