Talk:Deluge (software)

message: In the box in the top-right of the page it says "Stable Release: 2.0.3 (June 12, 2019; 19 months ago) [±]".  But this is not true for the Microsoft Windows platform, where the current release is still 1.3.15, dated May 12, 2017.  Similar to how with video-games different release dates are listed for each territory, maybe also list the Windows release on a separate line?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.38.255.130 (talk) 13:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: stable release

message: Today 2009-11-15 "Ho Jian Ming" was added as one of the creators of the deluge project, and to the list of major authors. Looks pretty suspicious, especially since he's not on deluge's About page: http://dev.deluge-torrent.info/wiki/About 71.61.176.250 (talk) 01:46, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: authors

message: *After Deluge reaches a certain point of maturity we should add Deluge to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_BitTorrent_software in order to increase cross-linking so that this page becomes easier findable in Wikipedia. (Samir85 21:13, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: deluge

message: It is a hassle to have to edit a separate page every time the version changes. Would anyone object to using the standard software infobox? Sam 23:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox template

message: Anyone opposed to using this svg version of the icon?  
24.13.55.149 23:20, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: SVG Icon

message: I added 0.5.8.8 to the timeline. Two versions are green because since for the windows port, 0.5.8.7 is the latest release that works. Noian (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  0.5.8.8 added 

message: Note: I have requested additional opinions at WP:3Oηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 04:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Third Opinion

message: *Remove Looking at the table purely for encyclopedic content and ignoring specific policies for the moment. The table doesn't make the article look better and for the amount of space it takes up it's not overly informative. I would prefer to see the comments in the significant changes column individually cited and written more encylopedically. I think the worthwhile information could easily be translated into prose and that would be better for the article (and the history section could do with a bit of tidying anyway. As to whether WP:NOTCHANGELOG applies. It quite clearly does.... emphasis addedWhere there are reliable third party sources discussing the updates, include that in the history section. The table doesn't seem appropriate or necessary. — SPACKlick (talk) 09:24, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC Comments

message: Should usage share information be added to "show notability", as per http://torrentfreak.com/whats-the-best-bittorrent-client-090517/, Deluge has around the same % of usage as BitTorrent Mainline (1%). ηoian ‡orever ηew ‡rontiers 04:50, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: If an independent reliable source reports on it, sure. I don’t think your link is quite working for me, but it looks like it’s supposed to include a user poll; those are wholly unreliable for our needs, and are never evidence of notability. A source reporting on those poll results, however, may be. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Usage Share? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Deluge (software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110430162656/http://svn.deluge-torrent.org:80/branches/1.1.0_RC/ChangeLog to http://svn.deluge-torrent.org/branches/1.1.0_RC/ChangeLog
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified