lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Ultraviolet photography

message: This article is linking to the radio waves. The terms are inappropritae for this UV article. -Arch dude 22:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I'm fixing the links for long, medium, and short wave. 

message: This article calls for pictures but all I find in Commons is black light pictures and ultraviolet astronomy that I understand are not the subject of this article.
--84.20.17.84 08:52, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Pictures

message: there seems to be an External Link (http://www.macrolenses.de/objektive_sl.php?lang) that's really a commercial endorsement. does anyone wlse think this should be removed? 220.76.15.52 (talk) 16:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: commerical endoresement

message: The mineral the UV-Lenses are made of is chemically calcium fluoride,
as a mineral called fluorite by geologists.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.221.220.217 (talk) 20:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fluorite, not Fluoride! 

message: Please expand and elaborate on the uses - how exactly is it used in astronomy, medicine, criminology, dermatology, theatre, etc... Also, does it have a practical use for professional photographers (outside of modern art exhibitions whose sole goal is to show stuff in fancy colours) - e.g. the portrait of the man that is in the article - how does that differ from a visible light photo and why might a photographer decide to make UV photos? Thanks! BigSteve (talk) 11:16, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uses
Template talk:LOC-image

message: :*Copied from Commons. Davilla 19:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Source

message: This template's HDL lookup only works for images from the Library of Congress's Prints and Photographs Division (the loc.pnp in the URL).  For images from the Geography and Map Division, see Template:LOC-map.  There may be other divisions as well that we should create templates for. --Delirium 07:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Note

message: This is not a copyright tag, but it should be used with a copyright tag. --evrik (talk) 13:30, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: This is a candidate to be copied to the Wikimedia Commons using the Transwiki process. 
Wikipedia is not a collection of photographs or media files and appropriately licensed media are more accessible to other Wikimedia projects if placed on Commons.
Should we add this text to the template (or something like it?)
--evrik (talk) 13:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Transwiki

message: :Image:1891 Rookery building.jpg and :Image:Armour Square.jpg--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM)  22:57, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images where I can not get the template to work
Talk:Androcles and the Lion (play)

message: The article read, 
:"Shaw analyzes the Bible and announces his findings wherein."
Wherein is of course wrong, because the wh-form must be relative or interrogative. But I can't really justify amending it to 'his findings therein' either, because you don't announce your findings in genetics, for example. The in isn't right. Do you have findings on genetics? Possibly. But I would expect findings concerning genetics or about genetics; or more often, people use no preposition at all and simply say, "These are my findings." 'Thereconcerning' isn't a word, and 'thereabout' and 'thereon' feel too pedantic. I think we lose nothing by simply cutting 'wherein' and replacing it with nothing. QuartierLatin1968  19:12, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We often read of "the latest findings in genetics" and similar phraseology.   Zaslav (talk) 06:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: A note

message: Was Shaw an atheist? --Santa Dog 72 21:06, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Another note

message: *Stub class - good start on History, but missing most Heading under Wikipedia:WikiProject_Theatre/Article_Structure guidelines, including Synopsis.
*Low importance - a single play constitutes a "highly specific area of knowledge".
--Dereksmootz (talk) 17:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Theatre Assessment 

message: The clause "Lavinia's metaphor of capturing a mouse to converting from Christianity to believing in the Roman gods" in the current version makes no sense.  A metaphor is not "to".  What is the meaning of this? Zaslav (talk) 06:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Garbles
Talk:Monthly Shōnen Jump

message: I don't know if anyone knew this but Monthly Jump is correctly spelled Monthly "Shonen Jump" with commas. Just wnted to point that out for any info. Jump Guru (talk) 19:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, we need to be more specific about that, somtimes they call the U.S. SHONEN JUMP: The Monthly version of Weekly Shonen Jump (or Monthly Shonen Jump). But technically it never had an english version, yet they have some series like Beet, Dragon Drive, and Claymore. – 「ＪＵＭＰＧＵＲＵ」@Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 01:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Shonen Jump" 
Talk:Pit viper

message: Bothrops atrox is not a fer-de-lance. Bothrops atrox is known in English as the common lancehead or yellow-jawed lancehead and localy as Barba ammirilla.  Bothrops lanceolatus is the ONLY fer-de-lance.
:Geetings, oh nameless one! As far as I'm concerned, you're right. However, you have to remember that "fer-de-lance" is just a common name, so I don't see that it really matters. After all: common names are not precise. As long as we get taxonomy right, the truth will eventually follow. As a matter of fact, if it turns out that this common name is often used for other species of the same genus as well, it would probably be a good idea to make a disambiguation page for it. --Jwinius 20:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Opening heading

message: "Its accuracy sometimes is 0.0002%" implies that whatever they are talking about, the snake is very very inaccurate.
71.139.165.140 (talk) 04:02, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:   Its accuracy sometimes is 0.0002% ???
Talk:Revised NEO Personality Inventory

message: Some of these items seem awfully similar to each other or the exact opposites of each other. Warmth and gregariousness sound like the same thing from a website I found on Google about the NEO PI-R. Impulsiveness and deliberation seem to be measuring opposite poles of the same trait. Altruism and tender-mindedness also seem very much alike from the descriptions. Would anyone mind sating my curiosity?--NeantHumain 01:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  What are the differences? 

message: I cleaned up much of the writing in March and April 2016. The job isn't complete, but the article reads better now. I hope other Wikipedeans will also contribute to the entry. Iss246 (talk) 18:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup 

message: Hi everyone,
In my opinion, the title of this article should definitely be changed from "Revised NEO Personality Inventory" to just "NEO Personality Inventory."  Why?  Because including the "Revised"  word denotes the 1990 version of this personality test, whereas there is also the original 1978 publication, the 1985 version (NEO PI), and the 2005 version (NEO PI-3).  Yes, simply writing "NEO Personality Inventory" would kinda denote the 1985 version, but it could also be construed as an umbrella term for all 4 versions/publications.
Alternatively, retitle the article to "NEO Personality Inventory-3" since that is the formal name of the most recent (2005), and therefore most relevant, version of the test.
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1073191105279724
And yes Iss246, this article does still need cleanup.  But your efforts helped.
Armadillo1985 (talk) 22:47, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Retitle the article to "NEO Personality Inventory"?
Talk:Can-Can (film)

message: It was, after Ben-Hur, the top grossing film of 1960, although it was a box office disappointment, failing to make back its production costs.
:How can it be 'top grossing', if it failed to make back its production costs? Valetude (talk) 20:24, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A hit  -  or not?
Talk:Applied psychology

message: Is there a field of "Psychology of Combat", or something like that? Maybe On Combat: The Psychology and Physiology of Deadly Conflict in War and in Peace could be usefull as a startup? - Nabla 20:54, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Psychology of Combat 

message: It is very evident that changes to this article are needed. I will be adding content to many sections. I will also be adding new history section. Additional help to critique the new content is welcomed.
Mary2brown (talk) 16:06, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edits are Coming 

message: I invited user Mrm7171 to discuss changes. The invitations are on his talk page. In the event he does not know about his talk page, I left a link to his talk page in the comments I have made after undoing changes he made. He just excised the entire occupational health psychology subheading from this page without any discussion. I am concerned about his going in like a surgeon, and removing an entire section.Iss246 (talk) 01:10, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Concern about changes that verge on vandalism

message: Hi fellow editors. There is currently great debate going on regarding what areas can legitimately be placed in this applied psychology section, given limited space. There has been no attempt so far to do this objectively and from the perspective of groiup consensus. However the psychology discipline and its related Wikipedia articles deserve such an approach in my opinion.Mrm7171 (talk) 03:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Group Discussion Requested on Criteria for inclusion 

message: — Assignment last updated by Joyb3 (talk) 21:46, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

message: sbussec bilding program
,Sbussce kaibi kam yakhel karnesomoye 2409:4062:4E83:5BD9:C361:5725:E8EA:777D (talk) 13:19, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  SBP
Template talk:BBC

message: Scotland (Alba) but not Wales (Cymru) - Reasons for this? 84.67.145.16 (talk) 21:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Alba

message: A report found here: https://www.nao.org.uk/report/managing-the-bbcs-estate/by the National Audit Office (United Kingdom) reports here: https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Managing-the-BBC-estate.pdf Media City Salford is the largest key property outside of London the 3rd highest running cost of any BBC facility outside of London and the largest number of BBC employees on site at a BBC facility outside of London basically its  most important property outside of London ahead of Cardiff and Birmingham and according to this here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/aboutthebbc/insidethebbc/managementstructure/biographies/webb_alice BBC North/Salford produced over 39,000 hours of output a year across TV, Radio and the Red Button are now made in the North, with more than 3,000 staff now at MediaCityUK, Salford making it the BBC’s key digital centre outside of London. So why is it relegated to the other properties section.--Navops47 (talk) 17:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Key Properties Mentioned in Template not accurate 

message: Given this is no longer a BBC property I wonder if it should be indicated as former (eg with its dates beside it). Also is there a case for adding Lime Grove and the BBC facilities at Alexandra Palace given their significance in BBC History? Dunarc (talk) 20:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Television Centre and defunct locations
Talk:Paolo Mantegazza

message: Was that weird toxic plant named after Paolo Mantegazza? And why?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.196.176.156 (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Heracleum mantegazzianum]] 
Talk:Ronald Poulton

message: Is he by any chance the Pongo or Podge (if I remember those correctly) mentioned in Betjeman's Summoned By Bells as the nickname of a favourite ex-pupil killed in the War? --Oxonian2006 19:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Better late than never! 'Pongo' or 'Podge' were imaginary. The poem refers to boys - Old Dragonians (as was Betjeman) - who'd been killed in the War, but not a specific boy. That it doesn't refer to Poulton is clear from the line: He might have played for England.... The whole poem is quoted here FunkyCanute (talk) 21:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Summoned by Bells
Talk:Drug holiday

message: Drug holiday and Drug vacation are manifestly the same thing, and have duplicate articles, the latter probably created without knowledge of the former. Drug holiday is the better-known and more widely used term in the field, and should be the actual article. I propose to merge the articles and then add some material. --MCB 19:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The merger is complete; drug vacation now redirects here; and I reorganized the article and added sources. --MCB 04:23, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger 

message: I think it is debatable to say, as this article does, that drug holidays are best known in the field of HIV therapy. In the [[Radio 
Four]] programme "Inside Health" (the programme that is presented by  Mark Porter) in April 2013, a man on the  programme claimed that the most well-known use of drug holidays related to use of statins. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Debatable point in this article

message: :The idea of a holiday is an acknowledgement that longer term psychoactive drug formulations may represent risks not apparent in early phases of use.
I removed this as it needs clarification or examples. Also, the phrasing seems a bit biased.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AttishOculus (talk • contribs) 16:57, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Drug holiday as acknowledgement 

message: Are there any facilities that take patients to monitor them long term when on excessive medications for multiple illnesses? 2600:1004:B10B:BF9C:0:2B:A21A:7F01 (talk) 02:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Are there any facilities that take patients to monitor
Talk:Message in a Box: The Complete Recordings

message: As far as I can understand :
1. The original 1993 box-set "long box format" includes a booklet... but which size and w/ how many pages ?
2. The Edel 2006 reed. is a 100 p. large size hardback book, which also includes the 4 cds of course, these five items being in a large box... or not ? If yes, how big is be the box ? More important : who is the author of the book ?
3. Now there is a 2012 special Frecnh edition, by Stéphane Bachès, which looks quite similar to the Edel one, adding a translation in French of the text on some extra sheets inserted inside the English-speaking book.  But it looks as if there is no extra box... I'm gonna write to the translator-editor, right now ! 
Sorry for my poor English and... thanks a lot in advance  --Bibliorock (talk) 15:20, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  booklet or book ?
Talk:Phonological loop

message: Any reference for the second paragraph? Took 19:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

message: Anybody have an opinion on this? Lova Falk 16:23, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I would have thought that this is not just Baddeley's concept any more and that a short page that covered it would be useful. On the other hand, if this is a well-discussed, settled matter, then so be it. I don't feel all that strongly. DCDuring 00:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merging into [[Baddeley's model of working memory]]
Talk:J. Johnston Pettigrew

message: Time and time again I read of the Pettigrew name being of huegenot origin.This is inaccurate the name is Scottish, check out Sir thomas Pettigrew lord lyon of Scotland 1520, branches of the family were in France but were not of huegenot origin.The name is of Pictish origin, hence the many pett and pit place names in Scotland, Pettinain, Pettycur etc, it would appear our American cousins are trying to rewrite our origin, just as they do with Hollywood. ROY URQUHART PETTIGREW
: I added a citation for his background. I don't know that you can say that since many Pettigrews came from Scotland, that means that all of them must have. If you can provide a secondary source citation for an alternative background of this particular individual, be my guest. Hal Jespersen 22:15, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pettigrew's ancestry 

message: General Pettigrew's gravesite can be visited by the public. There is a path from Somerset Place State Park that leads to a small family plot with his crypt. I assume the location was once part of "Bonarva" his family's estate. I've seen it once (its a bit of a walk) - seems to be a bit unkempt.... Engr105th 19:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gravesite 

message: Does anyone know anything about this? Dates, primarily, but also what was the relationship with James Lawrence Orr, who organized that Regiment & actually served as its first colonel. Hywel Dda (talk) 14:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colonelcy, [[1st_South_Carolina_Rifle_Regiment|1st SC Rifle Regiment]] 
Talk:News.admin.net-abuse.email

message: Contrary to my mis-spelt edit summary , I removed the Kooks section because it was blatantly *POV* not NPOV, as well as being unsourced. Listing real life people in an online encyclopedia as "kooks", which IMO is entirely subjective, is just begging for problems both legal and otherwise. This is different from the "kook awards" of the AUK article in that it's NPOV to state that a group "awarded" somebody with the title "kook of the month", but very much POV to state that a person IS a kook. Nortelrye 20:08, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed the Kooks Section

message: I didn't add the "Kooks" section but what I recall of it didn't strike me as being erroneous or unfair.  But if there were the possibility of legal problems I'd be just as happy with leaving the section but changing the designation from "kooks" to something legally sustainable.  Maybe "non-productive irritants" would be a possibility.
But I'm just blathering - I have no interest in doing that actual work, simple though it might be.
Minasbeede 18:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Yeah, OK

message: for around 2 weeks already, the nanae faq link is broken --- leading to a parked domain page full of advertisement. Where is the most recent FAQ now? 89.138.136.59 08:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  where has the NANAE faq gone?! 
Talk:Constance Kamii

message: Prod concern stated as "Article started as a puffy piece and was turned into a resume--with a complete lack of secondary sources, and thus no suggestion she passes PROF, and no indication of inherent notability, this should be deleted." The subject of this article has written several highly cited books, and it seems highly likely to me that she does meet WP:NACADEMIC. Deletion of this article is certainly not uncontroversial - it could easily be improved and properly referenced. A quick look at the history shows that a lot of information has been deleted which could be usefully returned and revised. RebeccaGreen (talk) 17:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reason for PROD removal
Talk:Lords of Kobol

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was Move.  Unopposed and sounds like a no-brainer.  —Wknight94 (talk) 18:54, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Has Ares actually be mentioned on BSG as the god of war?  It's also possible that Mars is just another name for Ares in Colonialese. (Alphaboi867 20:20, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mars=Ares? 

message: I've removed the following bit from the article:
:Other evidence in the series suggests that Earth as a 13th colony is a false legend, and that Kobol was populated from Earth.  Most notably in the Tomb of Athena it is revealed the flags of the colonies contain constellations as viewed from Earth, that the colonies are named after the Earth Zodiac, and that the Lagoon Nebula, which sits between Earth and the colonies, is known to Adama as Messier 8, a designation dating from 18th century Earth.  In this case, the Lords of Kobol are named after Earth mythology rather than the source of it.
While it is an interesting theory, it is 100% fan speculation and original research, which is against Wikipedia policy, and in fact contradicts BSG canon and information given on the show. It has no place here. -- Ritchy 21:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing speculation

message: The way the article is written gives tha false impression that aurora (or Eos) was one of the 12 gods of Olympus. She was not. She was a minor deity in ancient greek and roman mythology. This begs the question of whether this is a mistake by the writers or if there isn't a 1-to-1 correspondence to the 12 gods, opening the way for further deviations in the remaining unknown lords. --Gsapient 19:53, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Aurora 

message: The article seems to separate "God whose name must not be spoken" from "Cylon God."  My impression the show was that no such distinction was made, and that the two could be one and the same.  The Cylon God has clear roots in the Judeo-Christian traditions, and such in the Judaic tradition this were concerns about repeating the name of God. A stronger separations between these two, as well as a separation between the Cylon God and the human deities would help to better reflection the distiction as reflected in the show. -66.109.248.114 (talk) 23:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: God whose name must not be spoken 

message: I can't remember what episode, but Roslin mentions "Priestess of Oshun". Oshun is the Orisha of love, beauty, sex, healing, dance, fun & laughter, and money. She is firmly linked with water and especially rivers and fresh water. So if she has a priestess then it's safe to say she is viewed as one of the Lords of Kobol.
Oshun
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oshun
BoyintheMachine (talk) 19:16, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Priestess of Oshun
Talk:Stone of Farewell

message: As you may have noticed, I've put some work into making this into a full fledged article (only To Green Angel Tower is left).  Please note though that is has been quite some time since I read the novels, so I'm doing the best I can with the plot summaries and character lists.  If you find them lacking, or if you find inaccuracies, please fix and update them as necessary.  Thanks! - Runch 20:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expansion to Full Article 

message: It was odd to have only the middle volume of this trilogy treated as non-notable. Since the original trilogy was popular (and the author has become very popular since), and now various sequels and spinoffs are coming out, there's interest in the original again. Let's improve this rather than summarily dismiss it as non-notable. · rodii · 18:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Restored this article
Talk:Farther Pomerania

message: == I've never heard of a translation of German Vor- and Hinterpommern!!!! In English these parts are named Western and Eastern Pomerania!!!
 
Is Hinterpommern a German name for the whole of Farther Pomerania or just Western Pomerania ? --Lysytalk 20:15, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It´s the name for the area shown on the map in yellow.
*Only parts of Hither Pomerania were called Swedish Pomerania, not parts of Farther Pom. And I couldn´t find any source for ceding anything to Sweden in 1783.(217.184.150.90 (talk) 08:49, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

message: Kashubian was only spoken in rural eastern Farther Pomerania, not in the whole rural areas.(217.184.130.168 (talk) 14:21, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language