lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Kerb (disambiguation)

message: :Relocated from Talk:Curb#Curb versus Kerb.
My understanding is that "kerb" and "curb" are the same word, just spelled differently in British and US english. However, the current state of the pages kerb and curb would seem to indicate that this is not the case. If they are just different spellings then I propose we harmonize the pages so that each pair of pages point to the same place:<nowiki> curb and kerb; curb (road) and kerb (road); etc. I wouldn't care whether the ultimate page is kerb or curb i.e. curb as a redirect to kerb while kerb (road) redirects to curb (road) is fine with me. Ewlyahoocom 08:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If it really troubles you, you could suggest moving kerb to peristalith and doing whatever you want with kerb and curb. Can't say I see any overwhelming need to change the current situation myself though. The Kerb article makes it clear that roadside feature enthusiasts can get their info from the US English spelling page and I prefer seeing spelling diversity in wiki titles rather than encouraging spelling homogenisation in either direction across The Atlantic. I find that adding bracketed descriptions to disambiguate is rarely satisfactory. adamsan 17:18, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

text: The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was don't move. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 11:56, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Kerb versus Curb

message: :Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
* Oppose - I support adamsan's comments in the discussion below. NFH 10:20, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: merge all the articles relating to barrows such as forecourt and this one into a combined comprehensive article. kerb becomes a section with in that topic Boris 23:42, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I really want to delete this article or redirect to curb which i am sorley tempted  to do Boris 12:06, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal to new article Barrows (archaeology)
Talk:Bill Collins (racecaller)

message: Multiple source show dod as 1997, not 2004.  agapetos_angel 08:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Digimon Next

message: It's not going to be published in the U.S.? And that was vandalism? Dang, I had my hopes up too... – J U M P G U R U @Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 17:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tokyopop publication 

message: This manga has a lot of similarity to c'mon digimon 96.229.162.122 (talk) 12:41, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notes of similarity?
Talk:Digimon D-Cyber

message: Just to point that this is not a manga thus:
*No anime/manga project banner in the talk page
*No categorization related to manga
*No infobox related to animanga project used here
The manhua are covered by Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/World comics work group and the manwhua infobox is at Template:Infobox_manhua#Chinese_series_.28manhua.29. --KrebMarkt (talk) 12:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: While it may not be under the Anime and manga project proper, it is something the Digimon workgroup may want to keep track of. While the infobox and most of the categories have been swapped over, the banner should probably stay. - J Greb (talk) 19:39, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Not a manga
Talk:Global title

message: I want to know where to put this GT in GSM subsystem, such as MSC, HLR, BSC ... One GT work as Database oriented, problalby in HLR only, not in MSC or BSC. Any recommend to me, please advise. Thank so big!
*Global Title is used only in SS7. - Keith D. Tyler ¶ (AMA) 19:45, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

message: * This doesn't seem like a particularly bad article? I'm removing the clean-up tag, though naturally feel free to put it back if you can name any particular ways it can be cleaned-up :) Jdcooper 00:10, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the clean-up? 

message: As IMSI GT routing is not the only (and not event the predominant) form of SCCP Global Title routing, I suggest that the entire Global Title Routing in Mobile Network section be merged with a more suitable article such as Mobile Application Part. — Dgtsyb (talk) 07:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge suggestion
Talk:Digimon World

message: MetalEtemon is listed twice under "List of obtainable Digimon," both under "mega" level and ultimate. Which should be deleted? OkaleVI 11:00, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Neither, he's the only mega obtainable with a cheat device, although we could put him last under 'the following is actually Mega level Digimon but at the time of the game's creation the mega level did not exist and can only be obtained with the use of a cheat device' or something. Nightmare SE 11:52, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Double Entry of MetalEtemon 

message: Who is Rockmon? He is listed as an Adult (75.56.143.243 17:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A Champion level Digimon found in the wild, he's a recoloured Frigimon (same goes for MudFrigimon), he can be found in Infinity Mountain and GreyLord's Mansion, his Japanese name is Gouremon. Nightmare SE 18:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rockmon

message: I added a game guide tag. This sounds like a guide, mostly File City Inhabitants. Not that I'm complaining, I printed it to help with the game (:D) but it doesn't follow wikipolicy. Comments? Quatreryukami 16:00, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Game Guide Tag 

message: If the only reason for this suggested merger is because he has "only appeared in one game..." then I have no coice but to disagree because he has not appeared in one game, he is a major character in two different Digimon games. Nightmare SE 13:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Analogman

message: I've thrown the listed Digimon into tables... I think it's an improvement, but change or revert anything I've done wrong (I couldn't figure how to make notes properly, for one). I also mentioned merging the blank cells into large spaces in the edit summary if anybody else can do it, but now I think empty cells seem more appropriate. Revendetta (talk) 19:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Tables

message: A couple of years ago, there used to be a section where all the different medals were listed and what types of tournaments were in the game. I think there used to be a list of which Digimon could enter which tournaments. There was also another section on every Digimon's finishing moves and attack power. For example, MetalGreymon - Giga Scissor Claw - 215. So what happened to it? MasterGamer619 (talk) 00:35, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tournaments & Medal List 

message: Thunderballmon or Kaminarimon (Japanese Name), isn't listed on the unobtainable section of Digimon World. Even though there's no real data on him, he should at least be mentioned since there's a Digivolution Item (Electro Ring) for him and it goes under the same conditions as WereGarurumon. MasterGamer619 (talk) 06:39, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kaminarimon
Talk:Digimon World 3

message: The release dates are completely wrong for some reason, but I'm hesitant to change them since I'm wondering where the hell the dates on the page came from. o.O This page claims release dates before 2000, and also claimed that the game was called "digimon world 2000" before I changed it. Seriously, what?
Actual release dates:
(NA:) June 5, 2002
(JA:) July 4, 2002
(EU:) November 15, 2002
...the entire point of it being called Digimon World 2003 in europe was because it came out just before 2003. (And also because we never got DW2 in our region)
So where do the false dates come from? I'm pretty darn sure that my memory isn't playing tricks on me!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.126.181 (talk) 01:39, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect release dates 

message: See, I'm not a TOTAL vandal.
There was this HUGE block of Spanish or Portuguese (or some other language) text that I removed, I don't know much about you Wikiphile's rules but I don't see why you need a bunch of a foreign language on the English website. 70.110.84.170 (talk) 02:46, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  uh... spanish? 

message: Why can I not battle other people's Digimon and only card battle them? I haven't fought them at all in terms of Digimon battling, so why am I having to card battle all the time? It is really starting to annoy me, help would be appreciated. For a more knowledgeable and relaxed Wikipedia- Nemesis646 (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only card battles 
Talk:Bowman's layer

message: *Please remember that Bowman's layer is not a membrane.
The correct term /entry should be "Bowman's Layer".  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harilatron (talk • contribs) 13:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that Bowman's layer is a more accurate name.  Hovea 14:22, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Not a membrane

message: The article states that Bowman's layer is absent in carnivores; this seems inaccurate, as "carnivores" is not a taxonomic distinction but a behavioral one.  Also, mice are listed as carnivores, when most are omnivores. Hamiltondaniel (talk) 08:19, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Not absent in carnivores
Talk:Digimon Rumble Arena

message: Has a way been revealed to unlock Lopmon/Cherubimon? It's listed in this article, but I've checked all of the major cheat sites and found nothing. Heck, I wrote one of the strategies at GameFAQs; I went through the game with a fine-toothed comb and never found it. So is this a hoax, or a secret that's been hidden this entire time? The S 17:34, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see it on the article anymore, either way it was definitely a hoax, Lopmon nor Cherubimon are in this game.Nightmare SE 01:38, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Lopmon?

message: Is this game still played around the world today? If so, how has the game changed?  PaulSereeyothin (talk) 18:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rhetorical Question for Further Improvement
Talk:Gennai

message: with List of characters in Digimon Adventure? It doesn't seem like it is too long to be merged, and could be trimmed a little. Then again, he is a main character, so I would like other's opinion on this.KrytenKoro 17:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fine by me, but I do believe we should also do the same for Willis (Digimon), he is not more notable than Gennai by any means. And perhaps Yukio Oikawa as well, although in those two cases trimming would need to be done... Nightmare SE 13:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should this be merged
Talk:Leomon

message: Correct me if I am wrong, but hasn't Leomon died in virtually every Digimon Anime?
Yep.--UltimatePyro 04:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  First header 

message: I'm SURE he used to be an Ultimate, why was it changed? Bubble bunny
:Leomon was never an ultimate, I think you might be confused with IceLeomon. Nightmare SE 18:15, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Level
Talk:Timeline of Chicago history

message: Time bar renders incorrectly in Mozilla. Should that markup even be in Wikipedia? --Nagle 08:31, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I fixed it by removing the wikilinks from the timeline so now it's just plain text.  That seemed to work for some reason.  Since all the things mentioned in the timeline are already wikilinked in the article itself, it shouldn't be a problem.  Metros232 22:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There was a request for a Fort de Chicago page so I made one based off the information on this page. I could not find any more information on the internet. If anyone has the source for this material/knows more about it, come help edit the page.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipediatoperfection (talk • contribs) 
:According to the Encyclopedia of Chicago there never was a French fort. See http://www.encyclopedia.chicagohistory.org/pages/1730.html  —Jeremy (talk) 22:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fort de Chicago 

message: * Chicago Municipal Reference Library  
* Chicago Federal Archives and Records Center  -- M2545 (talk) 09:25, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of establishment in Chicago? 
Talk:Pallippuram, Palakkad

message: Thiruvanathapuram district also has a place by the same name. Jisha (Talk) 19:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Another Pallipuram

message: there is yetr another pallipuram in Ekm dt where the the first eauropean fort exists in india. the entry point of cranganore lake.: --202.83.55.119 02:35, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: another palli puram

message: Is the trivia section needed on the page? It does not report any special achievement or feature of the place, I would suggest omitting it.
If there are any such unique features/achievements please do put it up. Any comments/suggestions?--Jisha (Talk) 17:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Trivia section

message: This page about Pallippuram seems to be remarkably well created indeed. Let me give further suggestions on improving it.
Won't it be a good idea to trace back a little more into the history of Pallippuram and include the same as well?
Once Pallippuram was part of the "reconstituted" Valluvanad Taluk. At another point in time before that, it was also part of Nedunganad. This was when Nedunganad was under King Zamorins of Calicut (Samoothiri). It would be useful if we can dig into the history and specify the exact year / period pertaining to the above facts mentioned.
Isn't "Keralite" better or more appropriate as compared to "Keralan". Besides, I guess Perumthachan was a carpenter and sculptor as well.
In the "Economy" section, facts related to the bag industry at Pallippuram need to be added.
There is a lake named "Kolokkayal" spanning 24 acres near Parudur in Pallippuram owned by the Kumarampulakkal Namboothiri family.
Information about the recent refurbishment of the Pallippuram railway station and construction of new platform can be included. This was done in connection with the introduction of double track of railway between Mangalore and Shoranur. Although there are many places with the name 'Pallippuram' in Kerala, I think this is the only one with a railway station. In other words, if Pallippuram is referenced in Indian Railway map currently, it points to none other than this place!
Nirmalb 07:01, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Welcome new contributor. As you have pointed out, this page can be improved using the ideas you have provided above. Most of which are needed to make this page more useful for people looking for info. You are requested to pitch in with whatever info or fact you are able to contribute. Welcome once again! Jisha (Talk) 10:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Historical facts and other information 

message: I think all those editing this page are from the village itself. So its quite natural that they dont need any other source to get these information. Also its difficult to show internet links to show the references. I have got the details about the Panchayat directly from the Panchayat office and from other reliable sources.
So I request you to help me how to improve the article and remove those tags which makes the whole article unreliable.
Rajeev madhavan 06:05, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference and sources
Talk:Namibian War of Independence

message: It is usual to state who has won a war.  In this case the implication of the reference to SWAPO winning the elections is given as the result.  This suggests that SWAPO won the war.  They did not. They lost the military war.  The victory of SWAPO in the elections had little to do with the war.  SWAPO could have contested, and may have won, any one of the elections held during the war. An analogy would be Sinn Fein losing the uprising in Belfast, but winning the parliamentary elections of 1918.JohnC (talk) 06:22, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I lived in Windhoek during the war, which for most people south of Ovamboland meant only the odd explosive device and political murder (like that of Clemens Kapuuo). Namibian independence owes a lot more to the de Klerk government in South Africa than to any military successes of SWAPO, which were, at best, incidental. Ondundozonananandana (talk) 11:50, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that this information is important.  Who actually did win the war?  Whoever it was can you please add them to the article.  g.rocket (talk) 22:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please state who won the war 

message: To write about how Namibia acquired independence without mentioning the war in Angola in which a combined force of SWAPO, MPLA, and Cuban Army volunteers defeated South Africa, as well as the freedom struggle in South Africa and the world anti-apartheid movement, is to present it so out of context as to be utterly worthless. Mmclic (talk) 21:06, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: If you feel it is dishonest to leave out context, then please put in a background paragraph or something similar and add context.  g.rocket (talk) 22:05, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dishonest at best 

message: Who attacked who?? Different areas of wikipedia give different accounts of if SWAPO attacked the South African forces, or if it was vice versa. This should be researched and clarified.
:The South Africans attacked, but the source for that particular sentence states differently. --Katangais (talk) 17:05, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Omugulugwombashe 

message: Gbooks hits has "Namibian War" (103); "Namibian War of Independence" (20); "War in Namibia" (19). Gscholar has "War in Namibia" (576); "Namibian War" (363); "Namibian War of Independence" (146). Note that some colonial wars are included in the hits.--Zoupan 03:05, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Title
Talk:Cilly Aussem

message: hello,
i just noticed that there is a big gap for "cilly aussem". since thee is probably not much information on english web pages, i could hepl. i m a german - so surely my english is not perfect. if you like i can work on that article - but others may make corrections on the style and grammar.
best wishes,
217.83.111.71
:That sounds great! Work on the article and I will fix up any style and grammar issues. You might also be interested in the German version of the article. You could also create an account here, there are lots of good reasons.--Commander Keane 10:03, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Small sword

message: Going on what I've seen in museums, the smallsword was generally much shorter than a metre. It was essentially a long dagger. (129.11.76.230 09:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Length

message: This article doesn't seem to discuss historicity in various countries in much detail, feeling US-centric if anything. Mousenight (talk) 17:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Expanding on Cultural and National Diversity 

message: As early as the Boer War, British Army officers were ordered not to carry their swords in battle because it made them an obvious target. Doubtless, some continued to do so, and there is a famous photograph of a British officer carrying his sword on a D-Day beach. However, stating that this occurred frequently simply isn’t correct. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 08:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The photo of jack churchill is used in sword   He carried it on a training exercise, not d-day. Humphrey Tribble (talk) 19:28, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Carrying of swords in battle during the 20th century
Talk:Evan Roberts (minister)

message: The Early Life Section of this article has two very fundamental issues with both its reliability as reference material, and its stylistic construction:
* Only a single source is cited in support of the Section. The content of this source, which can be viewed here, does not support several of the accounts given within the Section. While the source material is reliable/useful, more inline citations to other sources must be added or the content must be removed.
* The writing style of this Section is extremely awkward and incoherent, however requires the aforementioned issue to be addressed before stylistic edits can be made. I will include a brief excerpt which supports this assertion self-evidently (remember also that no background for these statements has been substantially established, as this is the first major section of the article):
 UBI-et-ORBI (talk) 00:44, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I have now removed the Refimprove and Awkward tags from this Section of the article, and have added new references as well as improved the clarity of the writing. Some citations which I cannot locate are still needed here, and I would suggest that the rest of the article also be reviewed for quality. UBI-et-ORBI (talk) 18:28, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Early Life' Section 

message: There have been some recent changes reflecting various middle names for the subject of the article. I cannot find a single source which provides me with a verifiable middle name; for example his tombstone, which can be viewed Here. Please provide a verifiable source if you intend to add or alter the individual's middle name. UBI-et-ORBI (talk) 13:06, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: One source has been located in favor of the middle name "John." I have reverted my removal of the name and added the appropriate source material. UBI-et-ORBI (talk) 14:30, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Middle Name

message: Someone please revise the "Collapse" portion. It is very bias.
In adding this entry, I have sought to lay out the essential elements of Evan Roberts life in as NPOV a manner as possible.  I invite others to add to and edit this entry.  I hope that they will honor the NPOV spirit in which it was created.  --98Hooker 09:31, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: NPOV
Talk:Cao Cao (song)

message: I added the song here. Hope you people can expand.--Tdxiang 陈 鼎 翔 (Talk)ContributionsContributions Chat with Tdxiang on IRC! 09:32, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for Expansion

message: There honestly isn't enough information for this song that would 1) be enough to become an article, 2) not already be found on the album page. Pandacomics 20:40, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge Proposal
Talk:Pays de la Loire

message: The text found on the Edit tab page for the Article is a huge series of apparent repetitions - can someone please check what's happened and simplify this page? Many thanks.VapourGhost (talk) 12:08, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Some vandal has been in the article; I reverted back to what I think is a clean version. Thanks so much for notifying. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 12:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spurious multiple repetitions on the Edit tab page for the Article 
Talk:Gala-Yuzawa Line

message: A map of this line would be nice. 71.131.197.112 06:08, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  map 

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*Support as per nom. Gala-Yuzawa Branch Line should then be redirected to Gala-Yuzawa Line. --DAJF (talk) 02:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey