lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Template talk:WoS game

message: Can I suggest that this template is not used for publishers/authors etc on WoS, at least in its current form? It currently links to infoseek.cgi, not infoseekpub.cgi, which would be what is needed for publishers? Cheers --Pak21 15:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Again, you are correct.  I have updated the usage accordingly.  --Frodet 15:50, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

text: I have created this one.  Could somebody please sanity check this one before it becomes too widely used...?  --Frodet 20:49, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looks ok, I've changed over the 8 links I modified previously to use the WoS_game template to use the WoS_pub template now. --WOSlinker 21:02, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publishers 

message: The following link can be used to show which pages use ths WoS_Game template: Special:Whatlinkshere/Template:WoS_game —The preceding unsigned comment was added by WOSlinker (talk • contribs) 20:11, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where Used 

message: As noted at Wikipedia:Copyrights#Linking to copyrighted works, we should not be linking to pages which distribute works in violation of copyright. Unfortunately, this is what World of Spectrum does (in most cases, anyway). I think we may need to obtain some more advice on whether links to WoS are a good idea or not. Cheers --Pak21 15:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure I agree.  While most (all?) of the contents on WoS is copyrighted, surely, most of the software where the copyright owner does not allow for re-distribution (e.g. Activision) has actually been removed from download and is not in violation.?  --Frodet 15:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  No. WoS's policy is that games are available unless the copyright holder has explicitly requested that they not be distributed. As such, the vast majority of the content on there is formally in violation of copyright. Cheers --Pak21 16:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, I should have added activly somewhere in there. :)  However, I do understand your point.  But this isn't really a problem with the template until we actually start mass-linking games to the WoS archive (through a bot).  Any links can still be made today; the template just facilitates the process.  Besides, this is another place where potential copyright owners can discover their work, and either allow or disalow the title in question.  --Frodet 18:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

text: A discussion is also taking place here .  --Frodet 11:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problems 

message: This template was listed on Wikipedia:Deletion review, and the result of the discussion was no consensus closure endorsed. BryanG(talk) 21:46, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  DRV
Talk:Boned!

message: I think John Howard makes a debut in this release as well. Should this be added in the trivia section with the others? M0rt 22:40, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Toccoa/Ocoee River

message: I added some photos I found on Wikipedia commons of the dams along the river. I think a section on them and the role power generation plays in the history of the river would be useful. Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:36, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Dams and power generation

message: This article could use more information on the kayaking and white water rafting section. It's very short and mostly includes information on the Olympics rather than the current use for it. It could definitely be expanded with an explanation of the many activities a visitor can do on the river. The rapids could even be described so that someone considering a visit would know what to expect on their trip.
SierraPitts96 (talk) 21:22, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  More Info
Talk:Abraham Cresques

message: AFAIK the name is Cresques Abraham, not the other way round.
Cresques the name, and Abraham the father's name. So, his son was named Jahudà Cresques after him. It is like modern day arabic names.
-- 83.44.189.143 22:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Dr. Goldfoot and the Bikini Machine

message: It seems rather obvious that the title was meant to reference the James Bond movie Goldfinger. However, obviously I want to stay away from original research, so I thought I'd put it out there for anyone who knows of a reference we can use.Lawikitejana 19:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Goldfinger/Goldfoot? 

message: its the year 2010 now and theres no android people of any kind and the japanese can barely make robots walk let alone talk and these androids could carry a conversation. this movie is nearly half a century old and i dont see this future in sight. perhaps it was set in a not so dystopian 2020 AD
necropolis20 99.51.212.6 (talk) 08:01, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  when does this movie take place? 

message: I know this can't be used in the article, but if anyone is interested, I can give some anecdotal evidence for the theory that real doctors forced the film to be retitled - I was 12 in 1965 and my doctor at the time and for several years after really was really a Doctor Goldfoot, based at the time in Westbourne Park Road, London. He claimed to have been responsible for the title change.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marcus Rowland (talk • contribs) 20:08, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Real Doctor Goldfoot?
Talk:Nusa Kambangan

message: The real name is 'Nusa Kambangan Island'. Nusa Kambangan is the name of the island. If this article has been written by other country, please change that tittle. All people can say 'Kambangan Island', but in here, it is not 'Kambangan Island'. It's 'Nusa Kambangan Island'. I am Indonesian, and I know about that island. -- Cuskar (talk) 02:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm.  Perhaps.  It's a bit difficult to get this right.  The island is often just referred to as "Nusakambangan" in the media.  But to be strictly correct, the media should refer to "Pulau Nusakambangan".  However to refer to "Pulau Nusa Kambangan" is a bit odd, too, because both "pulau" and "nusa" mean "island.  So references to "pulau Nusa Kambangan" can be (strictly) translated as "Kambangan Island Island".  On balance, my own preference is to try to keep it simple and just to refer to the island (pulau) as "Nusakambangan".  However, as Mas Cuskar points out, there are pros and cons about the issue. Pmccawley (talk) 03:03, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I think in the recent news the name "Nusa Kambangan" is more popularly used, while "Kambangan" island is less known. The term "nusa" is included in the name as in this news Washington Post: Welcome to ‘Execution Island,’ the surreal death site for Bali 9 drug smugglers I suggest to move the article name to Nusa Kambangan. The argument is, in English Wikipedia we did not change the Île-de-France into "Island of France" aren't we? so I think we should keep the "nusa" in name. Gunkarta  talk  12:20, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Kambangan Island 
Talk:Anti-Administration party

message: Who, under the Washington Administration, was a future Anti-Federalist? Anti-Federalism had been and gone with the ratification of the Constitution, the year before his first Inauguration. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:14, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Future anti-Federalists? 

message: "The Anti-Administration Party (1789–1792) was the informal faction led by Thomas Jefferson[...]"
"Virginia Congressman James Madison was the leader of the Anti-Administration Party"
Both of these contradictory statements are prominent within the article, clarification is definitely needed. --Genya Avocado (talk) 01:33, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: they were co-leaders, but at one time one was more prominent than the other. Rjensen (talk) 11:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ambiguity regarding the leader 

message: Someone wants to drop the article.  however standard recent scholarly sources do indeed use the term 1) "These factions had been known as the Anti-Administration Party" says . 2) "The Jefferson case study in chapter 3 discusses how Jefferson desired the presidency and how he and his allies built an “anti-administration” party." says  and p 22; 3) "Madison and Jefferson were at the center of a “rising anti-Administration party" says ; 4) "Thus the anti-administration party, a legislative party in the sense that its members consciously worked together," says ; 5) the term was used by Orrin G Libby back in 1913: "This may well be considered to mark the end of Jefferson's initial essay at the organization of an anti-administration party." in   Rjensen (talk) 12:06, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scholars do use the term 

message: Is there a cite for tea green being the color of the party? I've seen other pages have incorrect colors (for example, "salmon" for the federalists).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjengles3 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tea Green?
Talk:Banyumas Regency

message: Saya berharap anda menyukai Charlie Felix (talk) 06:47, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charlie Felix
Talk:Pemalang Regency

message: For Du Croo & Brauns see :nl:Du Croo & Brauns. Peter Horn User talk 16:50, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Du Croo & Brauns
Talk:Tegal

message: The famous Dutch writer, Louis Couperus,travelled to Tegal in June 1899, to visit his sister Trudy.
Her husband Gerard Vallette was Resident there at the time. His important novel "De stille kracht" is mainly set here.The novel is in the first place the story about the hatress of the uppressed indonesian population against there uppressors, the Dutch. There still exit pictures of the house of the resident.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 36.73.133.45 (talk) 05:16, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Louis Couperus and Tegal. 

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tagal, Indonesia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 9#Tagal, Indonesia until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:07, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Tagal, Indonesia" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
File talk:Steve Martin and Donald Duck in Disneyland The First 50 Magical Years.jpg

message: It makse sense to use this in the article on "Disneyland: The First 50 Magical Years", but I don't think the use on Steve Martin fits our guidelines for fair use. I don't see what of significance it's adding.. it looks like a decoration to me. --Gmaxwell 22:56, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

message: This picture should fall under the fair use guidelines because it is a image released as part of a press kit.  Besides, there is no other way to obtain the image because no flash photography is permitted in the theater.  Therefore, this is the only way to obtain the image.  Jonyyeh 01:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair Use
Talk:A Bright Shining Lie

message: The Synopsis
It is clear that whoever wrote the synopsis has only read the first hundred pages of this book.  I shall attempt to write a more accurate synopsis if time permits. 83.193.106.221 22:59, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: The book is far more critical of Gen. Harkins' early leadership in Vietnam than it is Gen. Westmoreland's, as he even reports that the commonplace term for making a colossal mistake, "pulling a boner", was replaced in the early years in Vietnam by "pulling a Harkins". 2600:1004:B104:310B:59AE:4694:8B2E:837B (talk) 00:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harkins 

message: It's been years since I read it but I seem to recall the book being fairly critical of Vann, to the point where the title seemed to be a reference to his relationships with the journalists covering him, as well as (presumably) the deceptions of the US civilian and military leadership.74.96.110.219 (talk) 04:47, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Criticism of Vann
Talk:Bump

message: I remember this dance from the 1970s disco period. The article itself says nothing about the roaring 20s, nor hip hop. Can anyone verify this text? If not I will change it to reflect what is in the article it links to.Steve Pastor 22:59, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bump (dance)

message: not even a MENTION of the hairdo?!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.136.26.14 (talk) 01:29, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hairdo?
Talk:William Bingham

message: :William Bingham was known as the richest man in America.  Bingham was only twenty-eight years old when he achieved richest-man status. He made his fortune in three different ventures. First, he ran  a privateer operation in the Caribbean during the American revolution for Robert Morris. After the revolution, he bought up any worthless Continental currency he could accumulate, and profited greatly when Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton persuaded the Congress to redeem the currency at par. Next he invested enough gold bars to finance the Louisiana Purchase for Thomas Jefferson, as Napoleon had insisted on gold for payment. He also invested in the area in upstate New York now called Binghamton, and  in the future State of Maine. Westward migration turned toward Ohio rather than north once the British prohibition on colonizing past the Allegheny mountains was lifted.
This has several flaws. 
*How did anybody know who the richest man in America was in 1780? It would make you a target for the British and the Congress both.
*If we do know, what's our source that it wasn't Robert Morris the Financier? (Or Washington or Byrd of VA, or Livingstone of NY?) 
*More importantly, two of these ventures are entirely after 1780, and the third largely is.
*Most important, all of this is unsourced. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 00:27, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Bad writing
Talk:Robert Lichello

message: Note: In 2001 I wrote an "obituary" at Amazon.com regarding the publication of the AIM textbook for investors. (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/customer-reviews/0451204417/ref=cm_cr_dp_2_1/002-2173789-8137638?ie=UTF8&customer-reviews.sort%5Fby=-SubmissionDate&n=283155) The following is an edited version of my writing at that time: —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aim-user (talk • contribs). 
:Moved from article space. Angus McLellan  (Talk) 23:00, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Skate guard (hockey)

message: I just put on a template for WP: afd. We have a page named Skate Guards already that includes more info than this and generally has the same name. Should we delete this article? Hasek is the best 23:01, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I redirected it to skate guard. --- RockMFR 18:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Up for deletion
Talk:John Milledge

message: No mention of slave-owning. I feel that this category should be restricted to people whose slave-owning history was notable in itself. Valetude (talk) 16:55, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Category:American slave owners
Talk:Essex Hemphill

message: In 2019, a theatrical production called "TRIPTYCH (EYES OF ONE ON ANOTHER)" toured a number of cities in the US. The piece focused on the work of Robert Mapplethorpe and reactions to that work, and was comprised of music (about ten musicians and a conductor) and vocals by Roomful of Teeth, a viewpoint character wandering around the production looking at it as it unfolded, and projectors showing some of Mapplethorpe's photos, lyrics of the music being sung, and documents relating to an obscenity trial involving Mapplethorpe's work. Bryce Dessner was the composer,  libretto by korde arrington tuttle. The piece included poetry by Hemphill (who was critical of Mapplethorpe's work) and Patti Smith. This info should probably be filled out with references and included in the article. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/06/arts/music/review-bryce-dessner-robert-mapplethorpe-triptych.html is probably a good starting point.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.6.231.228 (talk) 09:37, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triptych
Talk:Symphony No. 68 (Haydn)

message: My secondary source ("Exploring Haydn", by Hurwitz) says two oboes, two bassoons, two horns and strings (no flutes and two bassoons).  Hurwitz is really more of a listening guide than a serious reference, though.  Could you double-check the scoring?  DavidRF 23:26, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Marking this resolved.  Thanks for checking.  DavidRF 03:05, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Scoring
Talk:Tiriel (poem)

message: As you can see, I've done an overhaul on the article. The basic info that was already there is still there, I've just added to it. There's not much point in me going into every little thing I did, as it's all there to see, but major changes included the addition of a new picture, a (small) section on critical interpretation, and info on how the poem connects to Blake's later mythological system. The synopsis may be a tad long, but I'm rubbish at writing deent short plot summaries, so apologies about that! As always, I welcome feedback. Bertaut (talk) 00:45, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  June 23 edits 

message: I just bolstered the whole thing out; especially the sections relating to Blake's mythology, and I added a number of relevant quotations from other poems. Added a couple of new critical references as well. Bertaut (talk) 19:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Your contributions are appreciated as always. I haven't had time to read it over closely but it looks good from skimming it. The only thing that sticks out at me is the title. Both Tiriel (the character) and Tiriel (Blake) (the poem) are Blake's. Wouldn't the more sensible title for this page be Tiriel (poem)? Also, the note at the top of the page is getting rather long. A disambiguation page might be nice. These are just little picky things, though. Lithoderm 21:55, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  October 24 edits
Talk:Thomas W. Ferry

message: It currently says:
"""
Ferry was reelected to the Senate in 1877, and served from March 4, 1871 to March 3, 1883. He was an unsuccessful candidate for reelection in 1881
"""
Should that last date be 1883?
-It should be 1882, actually.  Fixed - PianoDan (talk) 19:09, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Autodrome Saint-Eustache

message: Apparently only the first sentence has been copied from the website. If the rest is also a copyright violation, I wasn't able to find from where. - Mike Rosoft 23:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, it's not really a copyvio.  It reads like it was translated, so perhaps its a direct translation of a page originally in french? (though there is no page with this title on the french wikipedia.  I'm removing the tag. Dina 23:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

text: Confirmed, it was a direct copy and paste of the Google translation of it (http://www.google.com/translate?langpair=fr|en&u=http://www.autodrome-st-eustache.com/autodrome.php). This may or may not be a copyright violation (Probably is, as a derivative work), but it's definately incomprehensible, baised and lame. I have removed it and added some stub tags. 68.39.174.238 21:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:John J. Ingalls

message: Regarding the move of this page, John J. Ingalls (71%), J. J. Ingalls (10%), John Ingalls (9%), and John James Ingalls (7%) are the only iterations of Ingalls's name that constitute over 5% of references to him on newspapers.com. Star Garnet (talk) 23:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Common name
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/BostonMA

message: User:BostonMA
      run at Wed Dec 27 18:02:36 2006 GMT
Category talk:	3
Category:	31
Image talk:	3
Image:	12
Mainspace	1988
Portal talk:	1
Portal:	214
Talk:	693
Template:	12
User talk:	2137
User:	726
Wikipedia talk:	58
Wikipedia:	361
avg edits per article	2.81
earliest	14:43, 11 December 2005
number of unique articles	2217
total	6239
Editcount generated using Interiot's wannabe Kate's Tool. Nishkid64 18:03, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No big deal hehe, you could reset the timestamp on your vote now that it is opened, but I don't think it is needed. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 16:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

message: The nominee stated confusion at this question. Please let me clarify. What I mean is your experience outside of Wikipedia with researching and evaluating sources. As someone with a Master of Science, I would imagine that there was quite a bit of preparation of cited sources for your master's thesis, no? —Malber (talk • contribs) 18:27, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Could this statement above not be copy and pasted back into the project page - under the question mentioned - lots of people will miss it here - I almost did. Cheers Lethaniol 03:32, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clarification of question 7
Talk:Ararat Plain

message: It does not look like this name has sufficient backing from RS, to justify its existence in the the lede as an alternative to Ararat Plain. --Armatura (talk) 23:33, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Igdir plane
Talk:Storylines of EastEnders (2000s)

message: This article survived an AfD on the basis that the concerns there could be addressed.  Specifically, this article needs to be rewritten in accordance to WP:WAF.  See the AfD debate, particularly Gungadin's comment.  Mangojuicetalk 17:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: A 2009 discussion at WikiProject EastEnders lead to these storylines of EastEnders articles being redirected, due to nothing being written in accordance to WP:WAF in the two years following the second AFD, many storylines having their own articles, and other major storylines being covered in the articles about individual characters. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 16:52, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: AfD-mandated cleanup
Talk:Human Wreckage

message: What is the significance of this image on this page? Was it used to promote this film? If not, it should be removed, right? WikkanWitch (talk) 00:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: — I would agree with you. But are you sure that that still was really not taken on the set of HW? (the details of the file say it was — although Davenport looks slightly different from other stills from the film).--Joe McNeill (talk) 18:57, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still of Davenport on the set of a later film
Talk:Jan McLean

message: Hold fire before you delete.
While I am from Dunedin myself I have not heard of Jan McLean before I came across her name
on the Dunedin People page.
However entering her name into Google pulled over 10 pages referring to her products.
It is clear that her products are sold all over the world and going by the number of links
I would say that she is well known in the doll collecting world.
I think this page should stay.
I would like to say I am not into doll collecting myself, just sticking up for a fellow Dunedinite 
Paul Camford 23:46, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would invite you to add any sources you have that detail her as a person to the article.  Stuartyeates (talk) 18:58, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Next Avengers: Heroes of Tomorrow

message: I need to know how to title the external links. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
The main part of the article says that the movie is NOT based on the Young Avenger. At the same time, one of the external links take you to the Marvel page for the Young Avengers and the YA article points us here. So which is it? Is the movie based on YA or not?
Its NOT based on the comic series. I just put the lnik for more info on the comic book.
===8-28-07: 7:05 P.M.===
On the commentary for it on the Docor strange DVD, it says that it is not based on any comic series, and is a sequel to the ultimate avengers films.
===Avenger's Deaths===
Where is this information located?  Is there additional info on the DVD that explains how each Avenger died, it was not shown on the film itself. 207.250.155.126 (talk) 14:20, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Where is this information located?  Is there additional info on the DVD that explains how each Avenger died, it was not shown on the film itself. 207.250.155.126 (talk) 14:20, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Avenger's Deaths