lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Sneer

message: The image really doesn't help at all in understanding what is a "sneer"... 206.248.153.96 (talk) 07:35, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Image

message: --CopyToWiktionaryBot 07:48, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  2007-02-9 Automated pywikipediabot message 

message: I think it would really add a lot to this article. You can't have a "Popular Culture" section without anime! Propaniac (talk) 13:25, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can anyone make a list of anime episodes in which a character sneers?
Talk:Joey Piripitzi

message: I've taken "He played drums standing up, rather than using a stool." out. It was added by an IP address and I can't find anything to back it up. --Aioth 08:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

message: These two articles are obviously about the same person, but which is his real name? -Blu3d 19:22, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  joe vs joey
Talk:Thomson, Georgia

message: Stop adding those bands. They are not "notable".
Seems like a lot of people are having fun with this page.
----
I don't think all of Thomson is covered in water, so I am editing out that section of the geography. Also it seems someone has edited and changed the size of the city. Researching geography on census bureau website to correct.
Block quote
----
Could someone correct the demographics? I believe someone edited them.Regnimri 20:36, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

message: If you would like to know why I assessed the article the way I have, please use my talk page. Ethan (talk) 05:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Assessment
Talk:Shadow Children

message: On the Shadow Children series what age range is appropriate to read this content. Am asking this as my 9 year old child brought one of these books home from her school library.
--Tinkthis71 04:50, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Age appropriate content 

message: There is no info to back this claim up.  Until there is a source I've removed if from the article. 70.165.110.211 (talk) 19:30, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Shadow Children II Series

message: Today I am going to see if I can find among the hidden at my library 38.67.240.24 (talk) 10:52, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Among the hidden
Talk:Viola bastarda

message: I'm confused by the image of a viola bastarda. This article, as well as the Grove article, make it pretty clear that Viola bastarda is a style, not an instrument, with the one allowance that "Rognoni describes the standard size of a viola bastarda as between that of a tenor and bass viol, indicating a change in understanding of the term." What do you think? MarkBuckles 08:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If you read the full Grove article, and the entirety of this article, it will hopefully make it clear that although bastarda is primarily a style, there were also instruments created which were meant to maximize the player's ability to play in this style, in this case the viola bastarda. The same is true of the lyra viol and division viol. I don't think it's at all inappropriate to give an illustration of what the instrument looked like, when it was an instrument rather than a style. Mak (talk) 16:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

text: (13 years later) No one ever followed up by adding mention of Jason Paras's book, as User:Barochetto proposed years and years ago? What does that say about the seriousness of our project? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 01:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Viola bastarda as an instrument

message: How could someone have written an article and failed to include basic information such as the etymology of this term (i.e., what exactly does the "bastarda" in viola bastarda refer to)? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 01:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Etymology
Talk:Ann Simonton

message: I will be listing sources referencing Ann Simonton here, for use in the article or further research. - Crockspot 16:17, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 
Talk:Isla Sorna

message: Let it be known to any who think that Trespasser the game has anything to do with this, that they are dead wrong.
If you look on the wall in Hammond's office in the game, and compare it to that which is in the film, it is COMPELTELY different.
The story lines are also different. Checking the dates Hammond gives in the game against the film, you end up finding that JP took place not in 1993 as we're told in the film, but rather, in 1980something. 
Cannon wise, they are separated.
Yes the islands are the same name, but they are NOT the same in any other form. 
--72.188.61.226 04:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Separation of film and games

message: There needs to be a clearer separation in this article of what is true in the novel and what is true in the films; there are significant differences (eg the hurricane edits that myself and User:Tyrannosaur made). Batmanand | Talk 12:26, 20 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separation of novel and film

message: There is no article for Pteranodon Longiceps, instead, there is an article that has a breif overview of all pteranodon species. Please LEAVE  the brackets around Pteranodon as it will bring people to that article.
--70.119.50.167 00:58, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Leave Ptaranodon Longiceps

message: "Forgotten, dinosaurs take over the island and turn it into a real Jurassic Park. Some animals go extinct while others begins to exhibit strange behaviors."
This really doesn't seem to mesh well with the rest of the text... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.217.60.67 (talk) 12:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammatical errors 

message: For all of the other articles on Wikipedia, keep this one!
* I agree with whoever wrote the previous line
* I agree with the previous comments, let the page stay!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.185.63.133 (talk) 06:01, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Make the Page stay! 

message: In Velvet Barrios: Popular Culture & Chicana/o Sexualities (2002), Alicia Gaspar de Alba and Tomas Ybarra Frausto note "that dinosaurs are not the only threat on Isla Sorna (Isle of Cunning)."  Is that the translation of the island's name?  I do not know Spanish, so I checked this and the result was "Island Sarcasm".  I would like to cite somewhere in the article the translation as backed up by a third-party published source, but wasn't sure what to make of the one mentioned above.  Thanks!  Sincerely, --A NobodyMy talk 06:41, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation of name?
Talk:The Miracle Man (1919 film)

message: The phrase "Cohan sold the rights to the story to Paramount for $25,000", taken with the fact that original author Frank L. Packard sold the rights to the novel to Mayflower (the production company), not Paramount (the distributor), makes me think that there may be confusion here between the 1919 film and 1932 remake. It is unfortunate that there is no source cited for the Cohan rights. Dgcuff (talk) 17:18, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Phrase
Talk:Laure Manaudou

message: *Obviously yesterday she was very proud to display her new tongue piercing just after the world record, but is this kind of aesthetic detail encyclopedic.... ? Hektor 07:16, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Tongue piercing

message: What is the connection to the Netherlands? Roreek (talk) 15:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: it's written for example in the german wikipedia: "Manaudou ist die Tochter des ehemaligen französischen Handballspielers und -trainers Jean-Luc Manaudou und der niederländischen Badmintonspielerin Olga Schippers." She is the daughther of the dutch batmintonplayer Olga Schippers. See also here and here. --Japan01 (talk) 18:27, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WikiProject Netherlands? 

message: Removed the unnecessary salacious detail that someone included earlier regarding the nude photos of Manaudou; if someone thinks that level of detail is necessary, feel free to add it back in, but let's be professional about it and not resort to lewdness to describe what acts are being depicted.  It's hardly respectful towards Ms. Manaudou considering the embarrassment of the situation.  Evixir (talk) 03:36, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
replies: text:  Looks like someone tackled this; thanks to whoever contributed it. Evixir (talk) 18:30, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nude photos mention

message: COws are awesome
dlkjfkdhfkjadshfkjadhfkjhdfkjhadkfjhakfdhjasdkjfhskdjfhkjdfhkdsjhfksdjfkdsjhfkjdhsfkdjhfkhdskjfhkjdshfksadjhfksdhfkhdkjfhdksfj--58.65.172.252 (talk) 03:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  COWS
Talk:Tériade

message: WikiProject Biography Summer 2007 Assessment Drive
The article may be improved by following the WikiProject Biography 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. -- Yamara 14:00, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:WikiProject_Biography/Assessment#Class_parameter|Biography assessment rating]] comment 

message: If he was born on 1889 then he would be 26 and not 18 when he went to Paris. The Greek and German versions of this article suggest that he was born on 1897. Olafsonh (talk) 13:47, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth 
Talk:Rågsved

message: I agree that Rågsved may not be the most glamorous of suburbs, but I think it's a bit harsh to only characterize it as having "a bad reputation because of the incidence of drug use and criminality". There must be some other distinguishing features?Osli73 09:16, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad reputation? 

message: I guess it is social allowance-addicted people that say it is "working class". So fucking pathetic... There is no harch economic life in Sweden...
Hahahah. Pathetic idiot. Go home to Lidingö and weep that you can't afford three SUVs.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.217.169.240 (talk) 20:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Working class 

message: I personally find the current English text extremely biased and of low relevance.
Please cf swedish version...  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.217.65.21 (talk) 20:58, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Strange
Talk:Leland D. Melvin

message: He's retiring next month, nasa announced today.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.207.61.53 (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: retirement

message: Hello! This is to let editors know that :File:Leland Melvin.jpg, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for February 15, 2024. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2024-02-15. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page.  If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you!  — Amakuru (talk) 16:12, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Featured picture scheduled for POTD 

message: It's his birthday today! 24.246.121.34 (talk) 13:37, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Happy Birthday, Leland D. Melvin!
Talk:Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law

message: Added a lot of new info culled form newspapers. Cheers! Bunty.Gill 09:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Good work. If you can also provide details of the references (newspapers) you used, it will get even better. — Ambuj Saxena (talk) 09:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I've tagged the article with "Wikify." Plz. re-organize and add credible sources for the various claims made. Only FYI there were none until I added some. Kindly also internally link to other Wikipedia articles. After all this is satisfactorily done, plz. remove the "Wikify" tag. Thanking You, AltruismTo talk 11:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The page is virtually bereft of credible sources. As of now it contains just one footnote and two references, and all three of them point to the same site. There is one external link, which is wholly irrelevant. I'd even say questions of neutrality can be raised. Let's wait and watch a little.
Abhikmajumdar (talk) 12:08, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Plz. add sources 

message: This article uses the template . This template was forked from  way back in 2006. The template  has been completely rewritten since then, and this forked template has not benefitted from these improvements. From the point of view of maintenance, a few standard templates are better than a collection of many specific ones.
If the template  in this article were replaced with , no information would be lost and the parameter  would start to work.  I therefore suggest that this be done. HairyWombat 21:32, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template:Infobox Indian Institute of Technology
Talk:No. 12 Squadron RAAF

message: The Fairey Battle page claims 12 Squadron RAAF (and RAF just to confuse things) operated Battles.  My grandfather was an intelligence officer with 12 Squadron and has pictures of Battles.  But this page http://www.adf-serials.com.au/2a22.htm makes no mention of it.  Anyone know for sure?220.233.65.12 (talk) 23:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi, checking the Units of the RAAF source, there's no mention of Battles, nor are they described as serving with 12 Sqn on the aircraft's RAAF Museum page, nor in the aircraft's ADF-Serials page (which only mentions the RAF squadron). So while I can't speak for what your grandfather may have witnessed, I think the WP Fairey Battle page is incorrect. Even if 12 Sqn RAAF did happen to have a Battle or two attached for training or communications purposes (as some squadrons had the odd Moth or Wirraway) it certainly wasn't a 'Battle squadron'. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:26, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure that the RAAF only used Battles in its training units (where they were apparently quite successful). That material in the Fairey Battle article was unreferenced, so I've removed it. As Ian notes, some may have been used by this unit as squadron 'hacks' or for communications purposes, but a reference is needed. Nick-D (talk) 02:32, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fairey Battle?
Talk:No. 20 Squadron RAAF

message: Having added reactivation details and expanded the WWII subsection, I think this is GA-worthy so I'm going to nominate it shortly.  It was in nice shape to start with so if anyone who's made significant contributions (AC, Rupert, Nick) would like to come for the ride, pls feel free to add your name to the nom. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:10, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers, Ian, if I can help, I'll certainly try to do so. Thanks for your efforts. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 16:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Just so you know, Rupert, I've nominated at DYK for 9 May (date of GA pass) -- feel free to add an alt if you like, but I couldn't resist the beer-bottle episode... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:19, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks, Ian, yes I enjoyed that one! Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 08:43, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  GA nom
Talk:No. 23 Squadron RAAF

message: Hello,
I have made some corrections and additions that give the page some more accurate and up to date information. I advise you to leave the information as it is entirley correct. My father was the executive officer and cheif operations officer of 23 Squadron during the East Timor Campaign. 
Regards,
MilitaryHistoryGuru  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Militaryhistoryguru (talk • contribs) 04:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello, as I stated in response to your post on my talk page, Wikipedia content should be referenced to reliable sources per the verifiability policies. The information that you have provided needs to be backed up with such references. If it cannot be, then it should be removed. Please kindly self revert until you can provide the required references. As far as I am aware, No. 23 Squadron hasn't had a flying role since 1960, so what you have added does not seem right to me. (I can't find anything online that states they are flying the Super Hornet, either, which according to the RAAF is only operated by Nos. 1 and 6 Squadrons: )   Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 05:09, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  MilitaryHistoryGuru - there is no mention of 23 Sqn operating the F-111 in the appropriate RAAF Historical Section volume or Eather "Flying Squadrons of the Australian Defence Force" so unless you have a strong reference it cannot be included. With all due respect to your family connection I'd say you are probably mistaken about this. Personnel from 23 Sqn *may* have played some role in its introduction to service (as a guess given its role and the fact that it was at Amberely at the time) but I can't see that the squadron itself would have ever operated the aircraft. All reliable sources I've seen state that the squadron ceased flying operations in 1960 (long before the F-111s entered service). Per WP:PROVEIT the burden is on you to provide references for unsourced information when it is challenged. Anotherclown (talk) 06:10, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: This claim is complete rubbish. The RAAF reserve squadrons haven't had a flying role since the 1950s: at the time of the East Timor intervention they were basically holding units for reservists, who were attached to regular units during their periods of active service. The squadrons seem to have picked up some specific support roles in the last few years, but still don't operate any aircraft. The various works on the RAAF's F-111s are very clear about them only being operated by No. 1 and 6 Squadrons, as well as the ARDU (for trials purposes at various times) and the temporary RAAF Washington Flying Unit. Nick-D (talk) 08:33, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes
Talk:No. 30 Squadron RAAF

message: In my opinion, expanding the introduction by 1 to 3 sentences would be a good idea. Please note that I added 2 subheadings under History and moved the missile photo up because (on my monitor) it crossed the boundary between the History and Aircraft Operated sections. Djmaschek (talk) 05:48, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Cheers, I will see what I can do. The sub headings are good additions, IMO, cheers. AustralianRupert (talk) 09:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment
Talk:No. 35 Squadron RAAF

message: Why do we say, under "Vietnam and after": "Despite not being employed in an offensive role...."?
The official roles were (DEPARTMENT OF AIR ORGANIZATION DIRECTIVE NO 5/64):
9. The primary task of the Flight is to co-operate with the United States Forces in the operation of a Combined South East Asia Airlift System. The Flight will operate in the short range transport role and may be employed on the following tasks:-
(a) trooping,
(b) supply transport,
(c) supply dropping,
(d) para dropping,
(e) communications, and
(f) medical evacuation.
To these, in practice, may be added flare dropping and combat assault, altho' the latter is probably covered by "trooping". So a. and c., plus the flare dropping, were, in my somewhat educated opinion "offensive". Subject to further discussion, I'll rewrite this para in a couple of weeks.Lexysexy (talk) 06:40, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Non-combat?
Talk:No. 66 Squadron RAAF

message: Was there no badge designed for the unit? Any photos of 66 Squadron aircraft?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 06:08, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I couldn't find any images of it in the Australian War Memorial's online database. The RAAF Historical Section's publication doesn't show it as having had either a badge or motto (these are shown for the squadrons which did have them). Nick-D (talk) 07:12, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Gday. I've added a generic RAAF Anson photo. Do you think this works? If not pls revert. Anotherclown (talk) 00:55, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Images
Talk:Jean-Loup Chrétien

message: Just a small detail, what is the definition of West Europe? For example, if you include (todays) Germany, then he is no longer the first West European in space. On the other hand, East Germany is probably not in West Europe. Maybe there is a better definition? But the current one also seems fine. Isomorphismus (talk) 11:54, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:No. 73 Squadron RAAF

message: Pilot John Henderson was with 73 Sqn in the Middle-East in 1943 when he was lost, presumed killed. The article makes no mention of such postings. NAA record Doug butler (talk) 22:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That'd be No. 73 Squadron RAF, not the RAAF one -- the file seems to support that, like several RAAF pilots, he served with the RAF in WWII. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 08:15, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  No. 73 Sqn in Egypt ?
Talk:Veale Gardens

message: Should the information in the Mulligan (?sp) Enquiry relating to the Gardens be mentioned? It has recieved wide coverage in both the local and national press.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.122.228.82 (talk) 04:53, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Talk:HomeRF

message: *Merge. Yes, Homerf should be merged into HomeRF. Jonathan Bowen 09:30, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 2006

message: "The fact that our group didn't address that conflict led to the eventual downfall of HomeRF" sounds like the author of the article may have been very knowledgeable, but I'm pretty sure Wikipedia isn't supposed to be the place where an observer reports what happened.  Really need to see a source for the statement (even an author's name would be helpful).  207.172.210.101 (talk) 21:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rather badly needs citations
Talk:No. 460 Squadron RAAF

message: Any idea who lasted the longest in this crew, even throughout the war? Enlil Ninlil 06:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: What do you mean? Do you mean members of the crew who are still living or what? Fire e23 05:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled
Talk:No. 461 Squadron RAAF

message: The original image used in the infobox can be found at the Australian War Memorial Collections Database site where the aircraft is described as a Mk.V and the photo was taken in 1944; however, their own text on the history of the squadron clearly states that it upgraded to Mk.IIIs in 1944. Maybe someone can resolve this apparent anomaly, or perhaps the squadron operated both types!? --Red Sunset 18:31, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox image
Talk:The Desert Rats (film)

message: G'day everybody. Just made this page when I realised that all of the links to the Desert Rats movie directed to the actual British 7th Armoured Division page instead of one about the film, so I made this. I haven't actually seen the movie so if anybody would like to expand it, be my guest. DarkSideOfTheSpoon 09:31, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Hoe can a 1953 film be a prequel to a 1951 film? GrahamBould 06:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Prequel?

message: While unnamed, the General is twice stated to be an Australian, including by Rommel (James Mason). Why do we use "allied general" I wonder? Nickm57 (talk) 10:08, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: The General
Talk:St. Anger (song)

message: Someone write up on how to get the St. Anger Snare sound...it is colo
I suppose it would involve the use of tin cans. That would be asking for vandalism.... 24.252.195.70 13:11, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Would it be safe to classify this song under thrash metal?  I mean I know that WP requires citation on points, but with this song really I don't think there is much arguement that this isn't thrash metal.  I can tell just by listening to it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vgamer101 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Metal genre

message: I Thnk This Song Sounds Like Groove Metal, does someone agree with me????  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.132.229.110 (talk) 21:17, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Groove Metal