lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Castellum Lucullanum

message: This article seems like it is should really be transformed into articles about Eugippius and about St. Severinus. Either that, or more information on other inhabitants of Lucullanum should be added.
:A person and a place might make a single Wikipedia article where neither has any concrete existence or history without the other: Arthur and Camelot. That doesn't seem to be the case here, according to the respective texts. --Wetman 09:34, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Dan Donovan

message: ----
This is mixing two different Dan Donovan's.
The Big Audio Dynamite guy is not the same as the Tribe of Dan / Swamp Cranks / King Kool / Trashbone Thang guy (see his webpage which is the first listed).  
We'll need to split.  Most of the text is about the keyboard player.  About half the albums and most of the links are about the folk/blues/roots/swamp rocker.
-- Beardo 04:59, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is now done. Dan, the CowMan 22:35, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

message: I removed that reference - he is really only a footnote, playing with the touring group 90-91.
-- Beardo 05:07, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Sisters of Mercy
Talk:List of universities in Bosnia and Herzegovina

message: This list lacks the list of private universities which are quite numerous in Bosnia and Herzegovina. --Ogidog 05:03, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: --Čikić Dragan (talk) 20:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The name of this title should be moved to reflect list content - there are not listed only universities
Talk:Street furniture

message: Interesting concept! Is there some way to put this article in a category where it will attract wider attention? Could street furniture be considered a subgroup of architecture? How about a "Safety" or "Civil Engineering" category? Right now, unless someone is already familiar with the concept they won't know to look it up. --Judah haNasi 05:03, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure about this, but as Street furniture is the main article of :Category:Street furniture you could palce it in the parent categories of  :Category:Street furniture, but I'm not sure if this is the right thing to do or not. Ae-a 19:55, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that technically that's a no-no, but it does sound like a good idea, so I'm going to do it. Thanks!--Judah haNasi 07:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: is this a UK-only term?  RoI?  Oz/NZ?
AFAIK, term is not used in US or Canada.  can't think of a good equivalent, either.  66.105.218.8 (talk) 05:56, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Sometimes used in New York, as here]. Jim.henderson (talk) 01:08, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is definitely a UK term. You'll notice in the NY Times article they introduce it with quotes because it is unfamiliar. I am a US native with an extensive vocabulary and only heard of this term today. I changed the article to indicate that it is primarily a UK term, along with a dictionary reference that backs this up. 216.195.22.67 (talk) 12:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

text: It's used in India as well. I can quote some Tenders which use the term. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 13:07, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Britlish? 
Talk:I Know Why (Sheryl Crow song)

message: There's a huge backlog of articles tagged for merging.  It seems generally accepted that notable songs should have their own pages, but most songs not released as singles don't have enough information on their own to warrant a separate page.  In the interest of clearing the backlog, I'd say unless there's a lot more info to add to this page it should be merged. Jaye 21:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger?
Talk:Urobilin

message: See page 1022 of Voet and Voet 3rd ed. Stercobilin and Urobilin are not the same compound.
  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ardydavari (talk • contribs) 21:26, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is this the same thing as urochrome? —Keenan Pepper 05:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Both definitions sound eerily similar, I admit. This one seems more extensive, maybe urochrome's an alt name? Let's leave them separate with these discussion lines open so someone informed can inform us. Tyciol 10:38, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Urochrome comparison

message: Colorless Urobilinogin turns into urobilin only on contact with air? This does not pass the smell test 2603:6010:4900:163:8565:2F63:B8:7D82 (talk) 08:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  The article as written implies pee turns yellow on contact with air?  

message: I edited the article to remove the comment that suggested that urobilin oxygenation by atmospheric oxygen was responsible for the yellow color of urine.  This, obviously, is absurd, given the lack of air in the urinary tract and that urine is colored when voiding--prior to any exposure to air.   If anyone has objections, please voice them here. 
And the smell--not due to bilirubin but rather amine compounds (e.g. ammonia, esp. when left standing)... 
DrKC MD (talk) 23:47, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Urine's yellow color and exposure to air: correction
Talk:Local number portability

message: 'This article is about telephone number portability on landlines. For telephone number portability on mobile phones, see Mobile number portability.'
... then it goes on to discuss changing numbers on mobile phones.  --82.70.156.254 (talk) 13:09, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Mobile Number Portability

message: === LNP in Indonesia ===
Indonesia doesn't seems to launch LNP in 2007. The greatest problem is no investor who wants to invest a large amount of money into the project. Another consideration is about the careless of 20 percents of mobile phone users in Indonesia with this feature.Asni Harismi 02:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Country specifics

message: Indonesia doesn't seems to launch LNP in 2007. The greatest problem is no investor who wants to invest a large amount of money into the project. Another consideration is about the careless of 20 percents of mobile phone users in Indonesia with this feature.Asni Harismi 02:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  LNP in Indonesia 

message: This article needs a VoiP paragraph…a lot of people may not realize if they switch their phone service to an Internet-based service I *don't believe* the law covers them in they ever move or switch again. Historian932 (talk) 03:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  VoiP 

message: Colombia congress has announced to start the discussion on LNP on 2009.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.24.6.168 (talk) 20:12, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Colombia 

message: If the service provider suddenly goes out of business, ceases to function -- is there any way to port out the trapped phone number?-71.174.188.32 (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  provider unavailable
Talk:Charlottenhof Palace

message: :The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the debate was move to Charlottenhof Palace. —Nightstallion (?) 08:41, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Chateau Charlottenhof → Charlottenhof Palace - I believe there was a slight error in the translation of schloss to chateau. Chateau is a French word applied to French structures. Schloss is different and is translated as chateau only in French and into palace or castle in English. The foundation that cares for Charlottenhof is that which cares for Prussian *palaces*. Keeping it at Chateau Charlottenhof is akin to Schloss Versailles or Chateau Buckingham. Charles 05:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As above, note usage of palace on official site Charlottenhof Palace Charles 05:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I personally prefer Schloss Charlottenhof, but there does seem to be significant evidence that Charlottenhof Palace is also used in English (and even by the official body responsible for the building).  It has been suggested on the Talk:Chateau Schönhausen page that a decision on a name change there should have a similar effect on a name change of this page.  I strongly urge that a name change for this page be decided here.  Noel S McFerran 02:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Requested move

message: :As above, note usage of palace on official site Charlottenhof Palace Charles 05:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I personally prefer Schloss Charlottenhof, but there does seem to be significant evidence that Charlottenhof Palace is also used in English (and even by the official body responsible for the building).  It has been suggested on the Talk:Chateau Schönhausen page that a decision on a name change there should have a similar effect on a name change of this page.  I strongly urge that a name change for this page be decided here.  Noel S McFerran 02:30, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion
Talk:Michael Wong (singer)

message: I wonder if the writer of this page can do a similar article on his partner, Pin Guan. A bit odd that he gets a full length article while his old partner does not. -- Kengbeng 05:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pin Guan 

message: Thnx a lot for replacing the image.i was unsure of what to do about it.
and about Pin Guan,I am sorry to say that although I kinda like his music,I'm actually not very familliar with his biography and works.Perhaps some of his fans should do it?
I'm hoping that Guang Liang's discography section should be completed first because it looks so strange incomplete.Bakahito 14:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks 

message: Should change "Michael" to "Wong" where appropriate in the article. 129.31.72.52 08:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Encyclopedic tone

message: "but it was also to be held in the famous Hong Kong Coliseum where almost every Chinese singer dreams to stage their own concert. Apparently, he is the first Malaysian singer to do so."
Isn't it Eric Moo was the first Malaysian to stage a concert at Coliseum in year 1996, i.e. 10 years before Micheal? 
(Refer Eric Moo's wikipedia entry)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.190.129.52 (talk) 18:23, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Concert at Hong Kong Coliseum
Talk:Rhizome

message: This a pointless subject and should be deleted immediately. 
The point of Deleuze's use of this botanic concept is precisely of playing on the difference between botany and philosophy. They are not too separate things, although Deleuze of course uses the term in a much broader sense than the strict botanic sense. But to separate them in two articles misses the point, I'm afraid. As long as it doesn't make a huge article, I'm sure it's perfectly allright if they stick together... Lapaz  [on 11 March 2006]
It may be alright, but it's not really the job of an encyclopedia to draw the reader's attention to a metaphorical relationship between two dissimilar things.  And they are most certainly "too [sic] separate things,": as fun as it is to think differently, plants and ideas are fundamentally different.  I'm going to split this one up.
When I get around to it, that is.
ZacharyS 09:11, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: At this stage, I think the article is short enough to stay in one piece, and that Deleuze's metaphor based on the horizontal connectivity of botanic rhizomes does merit encyclopedic mention.  So unless the article grows much longer, I support Lapaz's view on this.  -- JimR 10:06, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Separate botany and philosophy?

message: I think some people don't understand the difference between a rhizome and a stolon. The stolon article has it right, but the tuber and rhizome articles are wrong. See [] and []--Jcvamp 19:59, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  As in the tuber article, tubers don't develop from stolons 

message: Asexual reproduction in plants is called regetative propagation  plants are known to reproduce regetative using their regetative materials. 45.214.154.77 (talk) 18:40, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Asexual reproduction in plants
Talk:List of operations

message: * By "complement" I think the author really means "negation"; either way, the more common notation is ¬ rather than the prime symbol.
:I don't know what you mean by "negation" - usally I think of negation as making something disappear or "to make negligable". It doesn't matter whats more common, everything should be on this page. You should add ¬ yourself. Fresheneesz 10:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I've seen exclusive or as written with an \oplus. In my class on Logical Design, we *never* used the conjunction and disjunction operators, only plus and times. Fresheneesz 10:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

text: I started this page specifically because I was looking for the compose operator, which I couldn't freaking find anywhere. Otherwise, it simply seems like a logical list to have. So an interested individual can find an operator that they don't know the name for. Fresheneesz 10:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

text: Do you have to write JA: before your comments? Thats confusing. I would advocate discouraging the use of certain operators, but we still must have them on the page. Fresheneesz 10:49, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: On sweating the small stuff

message: I think this page is to some extent duplicative of Table of mathematical symbols. --Trovatore 23:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication
Talk:Hostelling Scotland

message: I've made a serious attempt to neutralize the entry.  I'm sorry more of the original article couldn't be left in, but it really couldn't be called NPOV.  Candle-ends 06:29, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: You did a very good job. The paragraph about it leaving its roots behind should probably be removed completely unless we can find that someone other than a Wikipedia editor has made this complaint; otherwise it's original thought and not suitable for an encyclopaedia. For example, the website of a notable pressure group (i.e. with a membership greater than one local loony) or an editorial in a paper would back up this claim. I've stuck a  template on the paragraph and we can leave it up for a few days in case someone can find a source. --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 18:04, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the encouragement.  I'd be delighted to delete that last paragraph, which is why I left it in.  I think most of my contributions to the article infringe the 'no original research' law since I can't say I've based them on much except  my many hostel stays.  I'm looking around for places to cite, or barring that, information I could put in instead.  Candle-ends 03:22, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Second it being a good job. Technically your contributions infringe WP:NOR, but like many other articles they make descriptive claims the accuracy of which is easily verifiable by any reasonable adult without specialist knowledge, and should do fine until suitable reference sources are found. An obvious starting point is about ourselves, but hang it all I've added some bits from that and googled some sites as supporting evidence. Carry on chaps (and chapesses). .. dave souza, talk 12:10, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I really don't think the Tiso, Rambler's assoc, and Youngscot links should be here: they're about hostelling in general, not about the SYHA. If we had a Hostelling in Scotland article (or somesuch) that would be a more appropriate place for them. In addition to their debatable relevance, their presence also encourages spammers to add hostel-booking sites (and weakens our case for removing such spamlinks on the grounds that they're not specifically about the SYHA). -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 12:14, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, so I removed those external links for the moment. I also used the Angry Corrie article and the MSP's speech to reference the 'roots' paragraph. --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 12:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Revision of Page
Talk:Hampton Roads Bridge–Tunnel

message: *Does anyone but me call this thing "Herbert"??? - 216.54.27.211 20:49, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nicknames 

message: We have a very good picture from inside the tunnel in the infobox :File:Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel.jpg. An IP is attempting to add :File:Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel - on Interstate 64 Eastbound - panoramio (2).jpg? As the caption says, it's just "Another photo of the tunnel part", and a bad quality one at that. I don't see how that blurred photo of the inside of the tunnel adds anything useful over what the clear infobox picture gives us. 
This IP has been making similar additions of poor quality images to a number of tunnel articles. Meters (talk) 19:44, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  tunnel pictures
Talk:Yunnanosaurus

message: The opening paragraph “ranged in size from 7 meters (23 feet) long and 2 m (6.5 ft) high to 4 m (13 ft) long in the largest species.” doesn’t make sense and is inconsistent with detailed discussion of a specimen 13 meters long.   Neals384 (talk) 04:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size?
Talk:Hongshanosaurus

message: Although the lead states that "... two skulls are the only fossil material known," there are two fotos of multiple skeletons described as Hongshanosaurus.  Either the "only two skulls" statement is wrong or the fotos are mislabeled.  Ecphora (talk) 22:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The photos are labeled as coming from the Hong Kong Science Museum, which based on other photos on Wiki contains a large number of undescribed specimens on display. Apparently many Chinese museums are notorious for this, and many are fake. The specimens may be labeled Hongshanosaurus but that doesn't necessarily mean scientists have studied these specimens and determined that this is the correct classification. Dinoguy2 (talk) 04:48, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inconsistency in article
Talk:Indosaurus

message: Tortosa et al. (2013) found Indosaurus to be a member of a new subfamily, Majungasaurinae. However, I can't work out how to edit the automatic taxobox. Can somebody with a better grasp of how to use the taxoboxes change it for me? Gruekiller (talk) 06:36, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reclassification 

message: I hope that the organization of the wiki page is better now, if any complaints message me on my talk page and we can discuss. अथर्व कॉल (talk) 19:57, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reorganization
Template talk:Schools in Vancouver

message: I know that the norm here is to have schools named after people be reffered to solely by last name, but in this case I believe this is not suitable for two reasons. First of all, the school (unlike say Jamieson or McKechnie) is never reffered to (either colloquially or in print) as Quesnel. Seconly, since Jules-Maurice Quesnel is a relatively obscure historical figure, some may be mislead into believing that the school is named after the town of Quesnel, British Columbia (or the lake or river) and not the french-canadian explorer. Random89 07:07, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Jules Quesnel

message: The link in the private school section to St. Augustine's is actually to a totally different school located in India.
I attended St. Augustine's school for my elementary years of schooling. I was surprised to see an error like this.
An article for the actual school seems to be non-existent. I think I could try to create a new article but it is likely that it would result in a small stub.
Can anyone offer a temporary solution until someone writes an article? I will attempt to gather the resources to write a good article. I live very close to the school.
Alexsgstudent (talk) 16:31, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  St. Augustine's School Improper Link
Talk:Ectomobile

message: Removing the wikiquote link, since it doesn't actually seem to get any results. G-Flex 07:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  wikiquote? 

message: Removed link to limousine as "limo-style" simply means having windows in the rear 1/4s and has nothing to do with actual limousines. Also removed station wagon from the clarifier of combination. Combination meant a combination of a hearse and ambulance, and had nothing to do with station wagons. Improbcat 19:10, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor description edit 

message: Shouldn't the photo with the article be a car of the correct year - 1959?  The photo shows a 1961 model, the 62s had a different grille.  Elsquared (talk) 08:43, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  accurate photo please
Talk:Neo Contra

message: How can Bill Rizer have been cryogenically frozen for 10,000 years when the game is set in 4444 A.D.? - 85.210.11.39 14:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Contra(diction)

message: Not only is the Reception section way too short, it doesn't even have any citations at all. Only a few sentences even talk about any criticism.Abodos (talk) 21:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reception 
Talk:Korean salamander

message: Is there a difference between the Jeju Salamander (Hynobius quelpartensis) and Hynobius leechi quelpartensis? -- Visviva 07:23, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Question
Talk:World Teachers' Day

message: this article is terrible. Somebody who knows about the subject please rewrite it.
:I have edited the article and added some more information. If there is an error, please feel free to edit or you can send me a message so I can do necessary corrections.Darwin Naz (talk) 23:45, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The article stated that WTD is on Jan 13. The referenced UNESCO site had Oct 5 - so I changed this. If the old date is correct, someone please revert and include reference (and maybe a note regarding the reason for this difference).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Krueschan (talk • contribs) 10:43, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date
Talk:Deep Space Communications Complex

message: Created page. Haven't figured out the Spanish language tag yet. Rob 07:43, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: So are these {dab} tage OK here? I wanted to park them here until I wrote the Madrid article. Rob 05:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  {dab} OK?