Talk:Literal and figurative language

message: I think the rap is inappropriate for an encyclopedia. Entries should be written in prose in order to be concise. Mirage465 (talk) 05:12, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Rap Section

message: Isn't it logical to add to this page a list of types of figurative langiage, such as metaphor, similie, etc.? Or is there such a list on some other term? 80.178.164.204 08:17, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
thread_title:  Types of figurative language 

message: One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.springerlink.com/content/v5029336p8105433/. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:40, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: Hi guys
Any suggestion on how to resolve an interwiki issue where the article in one language is split in two in a different language, none of the two being more important than the other? Best regards, 
Rui Gabriel Correia (talk) 18:15, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article in English split in two articles in Portuguese 

message: The caption states:
"When "She is as pretty as a daisy" is used to describe the woman on the right, it is used in literal manner - she has the petals and leaves of a flower."
This is not what the phrase implies. It implies that the woman's level of prettiness matches that of a daisy. It is strictly a comment on how pretty she is, not whether she has petals and leaves. In the same way, the phrase "This coconut is as big as my head" does not imply that the coconut has eyes, a nose and a mouth, because it is only a comment on the size of the coconut, just as the sentence in the caption is only a comment on prettiness. The literal meaning of something matching one specified attribute of another thing is not that it shares all of its attributes. I am therefore removing the image and caption.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.216.33.109 (talk) 20:33, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image caption error 

message: Isn't it a particular case of figurative language? Perhaps both articles should be joined. At least they should link to each other. Now I know why we have so many "different" articles ;-) 85.193.216.88 (talk) 19:59, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  What about [[metaphorical language]]? 

message: Before I've visited this page; it started as follows: 
    *Literal language uses words exactly according to their proper [[meaning 
   (linguistics)|meaning]]s or precise definitions.
    *Figurative (or non-literal) language uses words deviating from their proper 
    definitions in order to achieve a more complicated understanding or 
    heightened effect.   
(Source code:) 
     
    *Literal language uses words exactly according to their proper [[meaning 
    (linguistics)|meaning]]s or precise definitions.
    *Figurative (or non-literal) language uses words deviating from their proper 
    definitions in order to achieve a more complicated understanding or 
    heightened effect. 
     
(Permalink) 
But the hyperlink on precise definition; which leads to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denotation and that though includes one meaning as "literal" definition; but have so many other meanings too; so the hyperlink was confusing. And the examples with images given there; is just the opposite of "literal meaning" 
Such as 
      "The denotation of this example is a red rose with a green stem. The connotation is that it is a symbol of passion and love – this is what the rose represents." 
So to avoid confusion, and reach accurate meaning; I  made new hyperlink as follows: 
     
      *Literal language uses words exactly according to their proper meanings or precise definitions.
      *Figurative (or non-literal) language uses words deviating from their proper definitions in order to achieve a more complicated understanding or 
       heightened effect.
Source: 
       
      *Literal language uses words exactly according to their proper meanings or precise definitions.
      *Figurative (or non-literal) language uses words deviating from their proper definitions in order to achieve a more complicated understanding or 
      heightened effect.
      
I. e. linked "precise" to Precising definition and definition to Definition. 
Permalink: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Literal_and_figurative_language&oldid=803567380
If anyone thinks the previous one was more correct and mine one contains any mistake, then they may discuss and revert the edit. 
I've placed the previous hyperlink about denotation to "See also section" ( Permalink:  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Literal_and_figurative_language&oldid=803567460 , compare: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Literal_and_figurative_language&type=revision&diff=803567460&oldid=803567380 ) So no worry the link is still available within the page. 
RIT RAJARSHI (talk) 08:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Did some change in hyperlink about "precise definition".  

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Literal and figurative language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140602073659/http://humanities.byu.edu/rhetoric/Figures/Figures-Overview.htm to http://humanities.byu.edu/rhetoric/Figures/Figures-Overview.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Idiomatic language may not be related, such as "raining cats and dogs" to express a heavy volume of precipitation, or it may be: for example, "keep your eye out for him" which expresses semantic contiguity since it expresses "be observant". In fact, many idioms have well established etymologies that show a relation between the non-literal and literal semantics of the phrase. For instance, "mind your p's and q's" derives from "mind your pints and quarts" expresses "mind your consumption of alcohol" expresses in a more specific sense the general activity of "behave appropriately". To say there is no connection between the lexemes "mind your p's and q's" and "behave appropriately" would be a clear falsity. From the idiom article in WP: "An idiom is a phrase or expression that typically presents a figurative, non-literal meaning attached to the phrase". This definition does not rule out semantic contiguity. jtvisona (talk) 17:51, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit of definition of idiom