lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Crystal momentum

message: I think that the article should explain the relation of crystal momentum to the electron-phonon interaction as well as the translational symmetry in the Hamiltonian.  I want to remove the extensive use of real in quotation marks.  WilliamDParker 16:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Form of article 

message: The crystal momentum is given by \hbar\mathbf k. The quantity \mathbf k denotes the wave vector. --132.199.98.122 16:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Units of crystal momentum 

message: Recently rewrote the article. Mostly this was for my own edification and understanding of the topic so clarifications would be welcome. A few notes: The first couple sentences are basically the same. Later on I wasn’t entirely convinced that the problem of finite momentum leading to electrons shooting out the sides of a crystal defines a real difference between regular and crystal momentum, so I canned the idea in the rewrite. I moved the old second paragraph under the “origins” section. Most of the rest of the previous article is reworked under “physical significance” which I was trying to write as a section that addresses how one might be able to think about crystal momentum intuitively. Pictures would be nice to add. I also removed the flags.  Csmallw (talk) 05:31, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewrite 

message: I think this article is not quite correct or too narrow: So in the first sentence it is said that crystal momentum refers to electrons. However, crystal momentum is also defined for phonons and magnons in crystal and is especially important for the description of their interaction. It would also be appropriate to derive it from more fundamental symmetries, namely the permutation symmetry of identical nuclei. This can be found e.g. in the appendices of the book by Ashcroft & Mermin.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.251.31.200 (talk) 06:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: I second that strongly. Crystal momentum is not only also defined for phonons and magnons, I would even say that the crystal momentum is as little specific to electrons as momentum is specific to automobiles: both have it, but they have also other quantities (energy for instance), and also other entities have momentum and crystal momentum, respectively. Fundamentally, momentum is a conserved quantity under specific circumstances if you have continuous translation symmetry of space, and crystal momentum is just the same but under the weaker assumption of discrete translation symmetry of space (that is, crystal symmetry). Because the assumption is weaker, a given momentum implies a crystal momentum but not the other way around. As you have momentum conservation in collisions between free electrons, you have crystal momentum conservation in collisions between electrons in a crystal potential and so on. I would say that all of this article apart from the three-sentence introduction should actually be incorporated in Bloch electrons. Seattle Jörg (talk) 07:57, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Article needs extension
Talk:Rico Blanco

message: Rico recently launched at Q Bistro, Malayan Plaza, Ortigas, Warner Music Philippines, his first single “Yugto” which marks his personal comeback and entry in the Filipino music industry as a solo artist and as homage to Warner Music as his new home. Ahead of its scheduled radio launch, Jim Baluyot who produced the debut solo album, stated that "Yugto" will be released on July.mb.com.ph, Rico Blanco goes solo--Florentino floro (talk) 13:55, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Yugto
Talk:Gateway of India

message: In this article, the dates make no sense whatsoever. there is a foto of the arch in 1911, yet the articles details building times from 1913 to 1924. Timetravelling british people?? 109.12.250.203 (talk) 21:46, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: yeah the dates conflict throughout the article Rainsage (talk) 21:15, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Should be better now - the "1911" photo clearly says 1924 on the file. One added wrong sentence removed. Polease check. Johnbod (talk) 01:07, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Building years vs photo 1911?!
Talk:Comedy of errors

message: My last edit should have been a "minor edit."  There were multiple spelling mistakes that were fixed.
Kmwiki 17:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

message: William Shakespeare wrote such a play, appropriately titled The Comedy of Errors.
This implies that the term was already in use at the time, and the play was so-named to refer to it. In reality, this play is how the term itself was coined in the first place. So it's not "appropriately" titled. It's "tautologically" titled. --76.224.69.130 (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Anachronism 

message: I have started a clean-up of this page, including putting it into sections.  Re the comment above, I don't believe that Shakespeare's work was "tautologically titled" either.  I feel that the phrase may have existed before Shakespeare, but have no proof either way, so I have re-worded the sentence completely --TimothyJacobson (talk) 01:35, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean-up 

message: A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Comedy of errors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comedy of errors until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.— PaleoNeonate — 07:30, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nomination of [[:Comedy of errors]] for deletion
Talk:Gohad Fort

message: This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MER-C 09:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible copyright problem
Talk:Compact-open topology

message: I qualified the statement
* If S is a subbase for Y, then the collection {V(K, U) : U in S} is a subbase for the compact-open topology on C(X, Y).
with the condition that the domain X be Hausdorff. If someone has a reference (or easy proof) that this is true for arbitrary X I would like to see it. -- Fropuff 17:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Subbases on the codomain

message: The conditions for the composition map to be continuous looks very strange to me.  A regular space is usually already Hausdorff (unless you use strange and very non-Bourbaki definitions) and one usually only talks about a space being locally compact if it is already Hausdorff.  Plus the locally compact condition is need on Y rather than X when composing maps from X to Y to Z.  I've edited the page, following Dugundji's book. --Giansira (talk) 12:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Please note the conventions used on Wikipedia: regular spaces need not be Hausdorff, nor do locally compact spaces. Also note that the composition was from Z to X to Y. You've also weakened the statement by unnecessarily requiring the first and last of these to be Hausdorff. I'm going to partially revert, but I'll try to reword things to be more clear. -- Fropuff (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Continuity of the composition map 

message: In the first sentence of the second paragraph in the introduction:
If the codomain of the functions under consideration have a uniform structure or a metric structure then the compact-open topology is the "topology of uniform convergence on compact sets."
Shouldn't it rather be:
If the codomain of the functions under consideration has a uniform structure or a metric structure then the compact-open topology is the "topology of uniform convergence on compact sets."
as the uniform structure is a property of the codomain, not the functions?
2001:638:60E:1E03:33FC:2810:F67D:4E40 (talk) 14:38, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typo in introduction?
Talk:Sphaleron

message: A strange choice of words.
Doesn't this play into proton decay and don't the known limits on proton instability place a firm limit on this?
Hcobb (talk) 03:38, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: unobservably rare?

message: A baryon net excess can be created during the electroweak symmetry breaking can be later preserved only if this phase transition was first-order.
This sentence (Second bullet in main content) is ungrammatical and confusing. I don't know enough about physics to correct it, but one of the can be phrases has to be wrong - or there are two thoughts jammed together.
Perhaps just delete the first can be?
Trelligan (talk) 19:48, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: let me se: "A baryon net excess that is created during the electroweak-symmetry-breaking can be later preserved only if this phase transition was first-order. Look good?Sinsearach (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Ungrammatical sentence, doesn't make sense.

message: There can be no way this is impossible, for instance in a 3D or even 4th-D(video) feynman diagram.Sinsearach (talk) 13:06, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMPOSSIBLE to represent by a feynman diagram? NO WAY
Talk:Gwalior Fort

message: Better photos for this article can be sourced from http://mea.gov.in/indiaperspective/2008/01200901.pdf, page 26. The website is a goverment of India website and hence should be free from copyright issues  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kedar Borhade (talk • contribs) 11:16, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  Government of India does not release all its iste contents in public domain like USA. The images need to be checked for copyright. --Redtigerxyz  Talk  06:51, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  better photo for this article 

message: Some of the text duplicates this.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 21:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sources 

message: The article contains a number of dynastic lists which seem out of place in an article about a structure. I propose to delete them and replace a short summary when necessary. Any thoughts or objections? Rsloch (talk) 13:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dynastic lists 

message: I've done a copy edit of this so I'll leave it a while to see if there are other suggestions. Kind regards, Myrtle. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 06:22, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Copy edit

message: This article needs better sources and more inline sources. There have been a slew of changes to numbers, dates, and other items in this article. Same issue is happening at Gwalior. I do have concerns about a block evasion/vandalism etc. But it is difficult to tell what is accurate at this point. --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 07:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Factual accuracy
Talk:Gymkhana Club, Chennai

message: Hi all,
Please note that there is scope for many more criteria to be added in info box. i have added them, but is not reflected in the article. If somebody knows how to create one, it will do good. also feel free to validate the info.Challengethelimits (talk) 01:09, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Info box
Talk:Complete set of commuting observables

message: AbsalomHicks (talk) 23:15, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

message: Note that one must take great care with the definition of "commuting observable" is when the observables are unbounded, because unbounded self-adjoint operators cannot have the entire Hilbert space as their domain and there are problems considering their products.  This difficulty is handled in the Reed & Simon methods of mathematical physics series of 4 volumes by defining two unbounded self adjoint operators to commute when their spectral projections commute.
Regarding the sixth problem above, maybe another satisfactory definition of "Complete set of compatible observables" would be a set of observables S with the property that if A and B are observables commuting with the elements of S then A and B commute with each other.  60.250.123.228 (talk) 14:08, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comment on the numerous problems
Talk:Fermion doubling

message: The article is a very important one in lattice field theory, so it deserves a good article about it. The rewrite is quite comprehensive, having compiled all views on the subjects taken on the subjects from the existing lattice QCD textbooks, especially Gattringer et al, Rothe, DeGrand et al, Monvay et al, as well as some relevant textbooks and papers. The article now covers fermion doubling in the naïve theory through three different methods: the doubling symmetry, the propagator poles, and the dispersion relation. It also gives the main solutions to the problem as well as the less well known point about derivative discretizations (mainly coming from Rothe's textbook). Also I have no idea why the article was a C-class before, but I do think it should be a C-class article now since it is comprehensive, well sourced, and (I hope) well written. OpenScience709 (talk) 19:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Complete rewrite
Talk:Harishchandragad

message: Harishchandragad is not in nashik district, correct district is "ahmednagar, maharashtra" Vj0062 (talk) 14:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  wrong information
Talk:Home gardens

message: This article is clearly not yet at C class as it is not yet substantial and has few references. However it is better than Stub class as it contains meaningful content and is much more than a mere dictionary definition. I have therefore raised it from Stub class to Start class.
Editors should concentrate on adding some reliable references and structuring the article, then extending it. A suitable and informative image would also be welcome. --Chris Jefferies (talk) 08:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Change from Stub class to Start class
Talk:Indian Coffee House, Kolkata

message: This article is essentially an advertisement.  Somebody needs to essentially rewrite this whole article with WP standards in mind.
It is not biased or advertisement. The Coffee house is a famous institution, and even has a song after it by Manna Dey. It is famous especially among the student's of Presidency College, Kolkata, and was the focal point of a number of social and radical movements, including the Naxalite Movement.130.209.6.40 14:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Bias/Advertisement

message: Why do we need separate article for each branch of Indian Coffee House (ICH as commonly known). AFIK all are employee owned and managed by the Workers' Co-Operative Society, as "Indian Coffee House" is registered name.
All the ones I have been has same staff uniform, emblem etc. It is there in many cities/states of India. And more in communist strong areas. Many of the one in Keralam are in/near by Universities or colleges and discussion/meeting point of students.
From http://wikitravel.org/en/Calcutta#Drink I feel ICH Calcutta is the same as http://www.indiancoffeehouse.com/history.htm
So we should merge "Indian Coffee House, Kolkata" back to "Indian Coffee House, Kerala" to form "Indian Coffee House". --Bijee 03:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge all Indian Coffee House 

message: What is "adda"?  No entries for it on the disambig page.  Jouster 00:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adda
Talk:Dark Journey (wrestling)

message: Has anyone come up yet with "reliable sources" regarding the notion that she was screwing Bill Watts, and this was what caused his divorce with Ene?RadioKAOS (talk) 06:19, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently not, since it's not cited.  And hey, stay classy.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.227.85.172 (talk) 21:06, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hmmm... 
Talk:Indian Museum

message: Bad Link: Just to bring to the attention of the editors that the link to the Indian Museum ( http://www.indianmuseumkolkata.org/ ) is a spam site or an expired domain name. The museum needs to claim it back.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.171.245.166 (talk) 01:57, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20091026173213/http://www.indianmuseumkolkata.org/wallich.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Dana boomer (talk) 16:27, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed 

message: My friend was very happy after visiting India' s museum 103.244.240.66 (talk) 17:27, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  I visited museum with my friend 

message: I went to the India museum, and it's not that big - certainly not the biggest in Asia (I also can't find this claim anywhere that isn't explicitly about this museum) can anyone explain in what way this is the biggest museum in Asia? 49.237.8.200 (talk) 06:13, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Size
Talk:Jaigarh Fort

message: This and some associated aricles are riddled with "AMBER" spelt as AMER. Is this a typing error or an alternative spelling of AMBER?BeckenhamBear (talk) 06:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  AMER 

message: While the reliability of the story of Treasure excavated from here during emergency is doubtful but nonetheless it should be mentioned here. Whether it was real or not, whether there was a treasure or not but the legend which is mentioned in many newspapers can be quoted here. Sajaypal007 (talk) 16:04, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Story of treasure of Jaigarh?
Talk:Jaisalmer Fort

message: Hey! You seem to be removing the image gallery for some reason. Can you explain why you think the gallery of images is indiscriminate? IMO the images should be left alone, wanted to ask why you feel like it doesn't fit in the article. --ShellPandey (talk) 06:06, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello ShellPandey, thank you for the ping.  There are currently 5 images placed adjacent to the article text, 1 additional in the infobox, plus 12 images presented in a gallery format.  Generally speaking, Wikipedia is not an image repository (WP:NOTGALLERY), and galleries should not be used as a device to shoehorn images into an article.  Some of these images are repetitive and provide little in the way of context.  Would it not be feasible to relocate surplus images to Commons repository, where it would make sense to present these same images?  Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Regarding gallery
Talk:Jijamata Udyaan

message: This article and Veermata Jeejabai Bhosale Udyan are about the same place. I think they should be merged. I am not sure which should be the article and which one the redirect though. Any comments? -- Belasd (talk) 07:27, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: They have been merged. The above is now a redirect. Donlammers (talk) 22:23, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 
Talk:Kalindi Kunj

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-08-29/delhi/28278368_1_giant-wheel-amusement-park-delhi-eye. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Puchiko (Talk-email) 14:04, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:Superconducting quantum computing

message: Page rewritten. Srjmas (talk) 20:15, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

message: — Assignment last updated by Za49 (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Quantum Information Science and Engineering
Talk:Kangla fort

message: with Manipur workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Manipur or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 05:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Manipur workgroup Addition
Talk:Karpaka Vinayakar Temple

message: http://chennainagarathar.tripod.com/Home_files/Pillayarpatti_pillayer.jpg
This link doen't go to the picture -- it goes to an empty page. This makes it questionable where you got it.  Mattisse(talk) 22:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image in article is questionagle 

message: Much of the recently added info is copied from . So, I'm reverting the changes. --Madhu 06:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyvio

message: I've removed an external link to templenet.com and a citation also referring to it. It contains a Trojan. --Stfg (talk) 13:31, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed links to site containing Trojan 

message: The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—49.207.185.236 (talk) 10:34, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: You haven't said what the correct coordinates should be, but I've attempted to emend them. Deor (talk) 16:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Coordinate error