lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Orchard Street

message: In Fantastic Four Vs. The X-Men #3, Orchard Street is shown to have an intersection with the fictional Yancy Street, a street that is popular in Fantastic Four comic books. Ben Grimm, 'The Thing' grew up on it. Lots42 (talk) 15:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crossing over with a fictional street.
Talk:Pelham Gardens, Bronx

message: The area is dominated by "private homes". Is their such thing as a public home? Arent all homes private? It should go without saying that the homes are private?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.202.94.89 (talk) 13:50, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe the author meant it isn't filled with public housing, like many bronx communities are? Not sure, so I'll let someone else fix this. — Eric Herboso 05:08, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  ?
Talk:Pulaski Day Parade

message: I propose a merge into General Pulaski Memorial Day. I think that the content here can easily be explained in the context of the holiday, and there isn't enough content hereto justify an entire article. Fitnr 16:49, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal 

message: In the first paragraph of the article, it says that it has been held every year since 1936, but the second paragraph says that it was first held in 1937. I would have just fixed it, but I don't know which is correct.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.83.211.48 (talk) 02:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  contradictions in article
Talk:Rambling with Gambling

message: The Gambling show has a rather complicated lineage -- it had its roots in a Morning Gym Class series begun over WOR by the forgotten morning-radio pioneer Arthur Bagley in 1924. When Bagley's series was taken to WEAF by sponsor Metropolitan Life in early 1925 (where it would continue for over a decade), the slot was taken over by health crusader/publishing magnate Bernarr MacFadden, who broadcast under the sponsorship of his own Physical Culture Magazine. 
Gambling was a WOR staff engineer assigned to work on the MacFadden program, and ended up taking it over when MacFadden and WOR came to a parting of the ways in mid-1925 (few people in any field of endeavor were able to get along with MacFadden for any length of time, it would seem.) The gym-class format continued with sponsorship taken over by Colgate-Palmolive. In 1930, Gambling began a long association with Broadcast brand canned meats, which sponsored the series thruout the 1930s. Thruout this period, the show owed a great deal to the basic format created by Bagley -- vigorous exercises of the jumping-jack variety combined with cheery music and humorous patter. 
Dunning, in his entry on Gambling, contends that the "gym class" format had ended by the mid-1930s, but this is incorrect --as proven by a surviving recording from December 1937, in which Gambling conducts his morning exercises with considerable gusto, to the accompaniment of Vincent Sorey's orchestra. As far as I've been able to determine from my own research, the exercises were still part of the program into the early 1940s. 
As Dunning correctly notes, however, "Rambling with Gambling" was originally a separate show from the morning wake-up program, an afternoon talk feature which began in 1942, and was subsequently transferred to early morning as a lead-in for the regular Gambling show. So "Rambling" as a series actually only goes back to the early forties -- even though WOR's publicity people have long since folded the two series into one for their own official history. Paul Austin (talk) 13:18, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

message: When I was growing up in New York in the 1960s, i remember hearing the "Rambling with Gambling" program on WOR radio. I also remember that, for some time, the show had a different host and was called "Rambling with Roberts."  I'd assumed that Gambling -- John A.? -- had left the station, and had been replaced.
Does anyone have any further information on this? I assume it'd be germane to the article, since the situation was important enough that the show's title had to be changed.71.183.3.99 (talk) 12:24, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Extended substitute host?
Talk:Rivington Street

message: Just wondering if anyone knows whether the name of Rivington Street derives from the printer of the same name? Thanks in advance.MarmadukePercy (talk) 02:07, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Apparently, yes. See James Rivington. — NickP (talk) 01:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: History of name
Talk:Rockaway Freeway

message: It seems that sections of this road have been closed. Google Maps doesn't show the part between Beach 73rd St and Beach 77th St, and Streetview has "road closed" signs and new construction across the former road. According to  (undated, but written before Thanksgiving 2009), the section between Beach 73rd St and Beach 67th St has been closed as well. Somebody more familiar with the area than me should be able to update the article accordingly. //Essin (talk) 21:33, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Update needed
Talk:Rockefeller University Press

message: The page was recently replaced with text from http://www.rockefeller.edu/rupress/about.html, so I rolled it back and warned the contributor. Bovlb (talk) 21:31, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright violation
Talk:Show Business (magazine)

message: Foreign edition? Different magazine altogether? 
Is this an image of the same magazine? Foreign edition? Different magazine? Sweden? Denmark? 
Different Show Business?  
EDLIS Café  13:55, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Studio Museum in Harlem

message: I see that new language has been added by an IP address.  This is okay, some of the info is good, but we can't use a straight cut and paste.  Also, some of the language needs to be more neutral, less promotional. Is there a reason we removed the artists Chris Ofili, Betye Saar, Lorna Simpson, and Kara Walker? --Knulclunk (talk) 02:49, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  New language from Studio Museum Press kit 

message: African American artist Tom Lloyd is incorrectly linked on this page  to a young British novelist with the same name. 11:19, 29 August 2013‎ User:Kwalkr
:I've removed it. Thank you, and welcome. :) Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:25, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Tom Lloyd link
Talk:Stuyvesant Heights, Brooklyn

message: An anon editor has added many tags to the history section.  They did this informally, and I have converted them to properly formatted tags.  Believe it or not, there were more informal tags, but these were mostly grammar errors and I've fixed those.  Anyway, this is a lot, but I am assuming good faith.  Certainly the grammar errors were real.  So whoever works on this article: if you can source several of the fact-tagged statements without any reversals, I would say this anon editor is not being sincere in his criticisms and would remove all the fact tags without further proofs.  Diderot's dreams (talk) 03:26, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Many tagged statements added at once 

message: Petrus Stuyvesant arrived in New Netherland in 1648 so it is highly unlikey that he founded the neighborhood in 1640.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.64.239.49 (talk) 13:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stuyvesant
Talk:Talk to Me (NYC)

message: This was a pretty big phenomenon.... I worked on Wall street at the time and basically everyone who worked down there can remember this happening.  I think they, over the course of a year, at about 200-400 people per day, talked to a significant percentage of the city. Not everyone *liked* them.... which may be why it's nominated for deletion.   Not sure it should be deleted though.  It's a small, but not ignorable, part of the cultural history of the city.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simul (talk • contribs) 13:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Theatre Row (New York City)

message: The redirect Beckett Theater has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:Beckett Theater]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Tremont, Bronx

message: This is somewhat interesting. So upon looking through google maps, i confirmed that the boundaries for Mt. Hope match the description for this specific article, and upon looking at the Community Board 5 website, a "Tremont" neighborhood appears to not even exist and instead shows Mt. Hope. Should we perhaps create an entirely new section for Mt. Hope? or simply revamp this current article to match what we already know about Mt. Hope? I'm sorry for bringing this up but this is quite confusing. I'm honestly thinking we do the latter since everything in this current article appears to match Mt. Hope almost exactly.EricViking32 (talk) 23:33, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mt. Hope or Tremont?
Talk:Tudor City

message: I don't think Tudor City is featured in The Jeffersons opening. It's an apartment building on 86th and 3rd Ave in Yorkville 66.9.126.26 (talk) 21:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There exist(ed?) a reproduction of the top building above the massive building in Tudor City, in Mexico City. It was located in what was once a big, broad, flowered, promenade but later was turned, first into a dumb ramp next to it, then into the also massive circuito interior (18 lanes).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.46.50 (talk) 16:37, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The top building 

message: As per which article? Vzeebjtf (talk) 04:33, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Four years after the edit in question, but I meant the Murray Hill article. Also, this NYT article defines Murray Hill as being south of 42nd Street from the river to around Madison Avenue (that part is a bit controversial, but it can be generally agreed that Murray Hill is immediately to the south of Tudor City, while Kips Bay is a little further south). – Epicgenius (talk) 21:43, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit summary: "clarify it is next to Murray Hill (as per that article)"
Talk:Battery "A" 1st Michigan Light Artillery Regiment

message: http://members.aol.com/dlharvey/batta.htm
http://www.civilwaralbum.com/misc/perry1.htm
http://www.bgsu.edu/colleges/library/cac/transcripts/ms0623t6202.html
http://www.cwartillery.org/sam.html
http://www.cwartillery.org/statues.html
http://www.battleofperryville.com/battle.html
http://www.fsu.edu/~ewoodwar/wvlee.html
http://www.suvcwmi.org/memorials/mcwm1.html
http://www.michmarkers.com/startup.asp?startpage=S0555.htm
http://www.nwtskirmisher.org/loomis.shtml
http://www.aotc.net/Perryville.htm
http://freepages.history.rootsweb.com/~indiana42nd/42nd_History_Perryville.htm
http://www.michiganhistorymagazine.com/date/october03/10_08_1862.html
There should be plenty here for someone more familiar with writing Wiki-standard articles to work with.  The Coldwater Battery was one of the most accomplished, accurate, and effective artillery units of the American Civil War.  In one instance, they opened a battle by placing the first shot fired into a locomotive over a mile away, surprising the Confederates and forcing them to leave behind supplies they were attempting to move by train. 
69.95.74.90 04:04, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 
Talk:Wakefield, Bronx

message: According to this map, the northernmost section of Wakefield was a separate section called "Washingtonville, Bronx," which explains why the Wakefield (Metro-North station) was originally named "Washingtonville." However, the station was renamed "Wakefield" long before Washingtonville became part of Wakefield. More info is needed on this. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  01:41, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Washingtonville section of Wakefiled 
Talk:West Harlem Environmental Action

message: This article requires a lot of editing in order to reach the standards that Wikipedia strives for. The entire introduction lacked citations, as there was not one citation within the first 3 paragraphs. From a readers perspective, this means that the information is not credible as there are no sources to back up any of the claims made. This theme continues throughout the entire article, however references are introduced. Some of the references used, especially reference 15, are not necessarily reliable sources as they are primary sources, meaning the information they produce about themselves are likely biased, leaning in their favor. This is most notable in the "Mission" section of the article, highlighting this sections unimportance and redundancy. Lastly, through reading, it becomes apparent that a lot of the vocabulary is not academic, ambiguous and misleading. Claims like "one of the biggest accomplishments", and "continuing to improve" are blanket claims with little standing. There is a lack of detail prominent within the articles.
Amsawyer1998 (talk) 02:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Bounding overwatch

message: I request that this article be moved to the title 'Bounding overwatch' because the present title capitalizes the 'O' in 'Overwatch'. WinterSpw 04:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. -- But|seriously|folks  07:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request move to 'Bounding overwatch' 

message: Please note there is an article named Leapfrogging (infantry) describing the same principle. Please consider merging them.M.Campos (talk) 21:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Leapfrogging (infantry)
Talk:William Trist Bailey

message: Hello, I know this is a rather obscure page but I think I could help with ancestral links which could be informative as I am a major genealogical nerd and he is a direct ancestor of mine 2A02:C7C:7B32:1B00:C5BC:583D:A15F:D556 (talk) 22:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Such as his parents, grandparents, descendants and so on and so forth 2A02:C7C:7B32:1B00:C5BC:583D:A15F:D556 (talk) 22:26, 26 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancestry
Talk:145th Street Bridge

message: So is this a replacement for another bridge built before 1901, according to photographer Arthur Parton. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  11:54, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: My first response is that the bridge in the picture is Maccombs.  I am not certain. -Jonathan 47.20.83.145 (talk) 15:56, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Before 1901?
Talk:3 Park Avenue

message: Please, all you who think links like this one] belong in Wikipedia, or who think they are spam or otherwise do not belong, kindly talk it over in Wikiproject New York's talk page rather than simply revert each other.  Me, I'm in favor of these links but even more in favor of us editors getting along.  Jim.henderson (talk) 18:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I looked at the two of these that were dropped into articles I follow, at the very least the photos seem like a valuable addition, it's unfortunate that the way they were added looked like an old-fashioned spamfest.  I'll consider re-adding the two I've looked at.  New users and enthusiasm don't mix well - I've seen this happen before with a good art site that ended up getting blacklisted.  --CliffC (talk) 02:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think it is a reputable link, as the author does not list citations or sources. With regard to this specific article, the In-arch.net site states that the building was built in 1976, but another site—a realty site—states that the building was constructed in 1975. Again, this is why I have inserted the notability tag, as the building is not notable enough to be able to find reliable information about it on the Internet. However, I am continuing to improve the page while it is still live.--Soulparadox (talk) 18:15, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  In-arch.net 

message: I have inserted a Notability template, as I have tried to find information about the building in online sources and it is not one of the notable constructions on Park Avenue. It does not even have historic significance, as it was built in 1975. For example, in this document by Deanna Kory, she does not even mention the building as significant: . I don't think it is significant on an architectural level as well, but if anyone had any further information, please contribute it to the article. It just doesn't seem to be reasonable just because the building is on Park Avenue. However, I am continuing to improve the page while it is still live.--Soulparadox (talk) 18:01, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Since developing the article further, I have realized the building's significance and have therefore removed the Notability template.--Soulparadox (talk) 02:49, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why is there a separate article for this building?
Talk:Bijou Theatre (Manhattan, 1917)

message: I would suggest renaming this article :Bijou Theatre (Manhattan) and changing the item on the disambiguation page :Bijou  from Bijou Theatre (New York) to Bijou Theatre (Manhattan). There are and have been many Bijou Theatres, including a prominent one in Brooklyn, later called Loew's Bijou Theatre. It would require changing the existing redirect at :Bijou Theatre (New York) to :Bijou Theatre (Manhattan). Vzeebjtf (talk) 06:11, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Vzeebjtf (talk) 11:16, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article 

message: I propose splitting this page into 2 articles. I'm not sure of the exact proposed titles just yet, but Bijou Theatre (Manhattan, 1878) and Bijou Theatre (Manhattan, 1917) could work based on the theaters' opening dates, similar to Lyric Theatre (New York City, 1998) and Lyric Theatre (New York City, 1903).  brought up this possibility last October, but I'm opening this for formal discussion. – Epicgenius (talk) 20:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: thanks Epicgenius for starting this conversation. My gut on why they're one is that there is some confusion around the end of the first theatre and beginning of the second theatre, or rather the Theatre Brighton and the first Bijou Theatre and people weren't sure how or where to split. That was certainly a road block I hit when trying to pair the sources with their material. I would definitely be in favor of some form of split as right now it's confusing to the reader and editors. Star Mississippi 20:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

text: These should absolutely be split. Have at it! oknazevad (talk) 04:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Potential split
Talk:Cafe Au Go Go

message: Surprisingly,this article contains nothing about the legendary live concert of the Stan Getz jazz group together with Austrud Gilberto singer.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.141.117.48 (talk) 21:22, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nothing said about the extraordinary Getz-Gilberto Concert 

message: Heard Miles Davis at the 69.123.226.157 (talk) 00:37, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cafe Au Go-Go in 1967
Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Businessman332211 2

message: Image:1
Mainspace202
Talk:70
User talk:51
User:33
Wikipedia:30
avg edits per page 2.63
earliest15:34, 24 August 2006
number of unique pages147
total387
* The edit count was retrieved from this link on 04:17, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit count for Businessman332211
Talk:Chumley's

message: Removed unsourced bit of information:
"Sadly, it was burned by a fire in 2009, but is in the process of being restored and back open for business come spring of 2010 according to a construction crew that I just asked today 1/13/10."
99.254.31.36 (talk) 12:20, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Biographical information about Leland Stanford Chumley can be found in the American Labor Who's Who (1925), p. 41, assuming this is the same Leland Stanford Chumley:
:CHUMLEY, Leland Stanford. Ed. The Hotel Worker, official organ of Hotel & Restaurant W. U., since 1923; exec. comt., Lg. for Mutual Aid since 1922; cartoonist. Born Jan. 22, 1885, Chattanooga, Tenn. Father a civil engineer. Art Institute, Chicago, IL 3 yrs. Went to work at age of 9; migratory hotel worker 1905-17. Ed. The Labor Defender, 1918; The Rebel Worker, 1919- 20; The Industrial Unionist, 1922; contributed series of drawings of labor leaders to The Labor Age, 1924; publicity work for gen. defense comt. 1917-8. Member I. W. W. 1909-23; Amal. Food W. since 1923. Author: Hotel and Restaurant Workers, 1914, for I. W. W.; numerous leaflets. Home, 134 W. 15 St.; office, 133 W. 51 St., New York, N. Y. 
Toby Higbie (talk) 22:45, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Leland Stanford Chumley
Talk:Kachō-no-miya

message: I'm not sure why 華頂 was romanized Kwacho; I'll be changing it to Kacho. I'm being lazy with macrons for now...
Konamaiki (talk) 21:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I understand why it's being alliterated as Kwacho, it's because Senzen Japanese would write it as くわちょう、くゎちょう or くぁちょう, but this has always been pronounced かちょう, so I'll be leaving it as Kacho. Konamaiki (talk) 10:08, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kwacho
Talk:Downtown Athletic Club

message: The first paragraph contains:
"The club was less than half a mile south of the World Trade Center and suffered major damage in the September 11, 2001 attacks." 
The second paragraph contains:
"The Downtown Athletic Club was NOT damaged in the 9/11 attack."
Please consider revising to correct contradiction.
Cjstanonis (talk) 23:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on 9/11 and Bankruptcy is contradictory. 

message: This building is very important in the R. Koolhaas most famous book "Delirious New York". I think this should be mentioned somewhere in the article. 186.53.39.122 (talk) 17:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Koolhaas Delirious NY 

message: Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://s-media.nyc.gov/agencies/lpc/lp/2075.pdf. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  epicgenius (talk) 00:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: For context, this material was added in 2005 and the source was published first in 2000. epicgenius (talk) 00:30, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright problem removed
Talk:El Morocco

message: Any connection between this club and the El Morocco located in Montreal? (the montreal club is mentioned on an LP by Charlie Manna).(mercurywoodrose)76.245.46.57 (talk) 01:12, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Other locations

message: El Morocco in NYC has reopened as a Latin music-based nightclub http://www.elmorocconyc.com/--68.51.87.188 (talk) 20:41, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Club in NYC Has Reopened