lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Nnamdi Azikiwe

message: I feel this line of text should be rephrased:
"Azikwe returned to Africa to enter politics"
Africa, is a continent with many different countries....you have to be specific about where he returned to, namely his country, namely Nigeria.
Thank you.
* I will change Africa to Nigeria. Next time be bold and edit it yourself! - Stoph 01:20, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The premature obituaries page states his obituary was published days before he died. A bit of an unfortunate coincidence I guess which must have consipiracy theorists working overtime. Can anyone elaborate on what actually happened? I notice he was very old so I guess may he may have been very sick or something so maybe they got misinformation? Nil Einne 22:32, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: does anyone have access to any souces about legislative achievements from his presidency or what he did while in office? the deatils here are kind of sparse and I have been having trouble locating other secondary sources. any help would be greatly appreciated! 134.126.151.207 (talk) 13:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Premature obituary 
Talk:Thirteen Steps to Mentalism

message: has been identified as a  level 3 article by at least one member of the Wikipedia community.|}
a brochure? --Wetman 08:13, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, the info is correct. The book is famous --TStone 20:23, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: ....I know this statement: "Together with Annemann's "Practical Mental Effects", it is considered standard literature for any magician, mentalist, or student of stage magic who wishes to incorporate psychic entertainment into his routine." is (essentially) true.......however in the world of wikipedia, ya' gotta back up statements like that.  Anybody wanna take a stab at it?  Buddpaul (talk) 21:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: As a magician
Talk:Lumbriculus variegatus

message: Further information and links are at http://www.skepticalaquarist.com/docs/feeding/blackworms.shtml (Wetman 08:23, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

message: Why is there a picture, that shows deformd individual? As far as I can tell, it is not really common to find two-tailed worms. At least not in laboratory experiments. In the "Human" article you won't expect a picture of conjoined twins or people with six fingers per hand as typical representatives of the human species, so why would you here?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.37.166.248 (talk) 09:38, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture 

message: why do you think there should be a merge? --awkwafaba (📥) 12:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: @Awkwafaba see identifiers at :Wikidata:Q16939084, eg WORMS, GBIF Estopedist1 (talk) 14:10, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  From Lumbriculus kareliensis, given that its a synonym,  Klbrain (talk) 20:59, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge?
Talk:Molly house

message: I don't think this is correct: "homosexuality in England was illegal, punishable by execution". Wasn't it buggery that was illegal, rather than homosexuality per se? DavidFarmbrough 08:37, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Homosexuality was recriminalised by the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885. Dave420 12:09, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Not correct, homosexuality was never illegal. It was homosexual acts that were banned.  The Act criminalized "gross indecency with another male, whether "in public or in private"".203.184.41.226 (talk) 22:22, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Only buggery that was illegal? 

message: Can we have this direct to a fish instead?  At least have a disambiguation?
:See Molly for disambiguation. Ashley VH (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Isn't this a fish? 

message: According to Rock 'n' Roll lore, the song "Good Golly Miss Molly" by Little Richard (1956) was a direct refrence to this and alludes to his days as a drag queen in such an establishment.
See []
Stratuser (talk) 10:05, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Miss Molly 

message: I know a lot of TV's nower days like BDSM and there must have been men back then sort out suck activitys.
There are no references to any place where men could go and see a dominatrix. 
There must have been somewhere, its like prostitution its one of the oldest professions.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.9.121.129 (talk) 19:45, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was BDSM also part of the Molly house,  
Talk:Apostolic Constitutions

message: from :
:"There were, however, in the East, from the early days up to the end of the fifth century, certain writings, closely related to each other, and which were in reality brief canon law treatises on ecclesiastical administration the duties of the clergy and the faithful, and especially on the liturgy. We refer to works attributed to the Apostles, very popular in the Oriental Churches, though devoid of official authority, and which may be called pseudo-epigraphic, rather than apocryphal. The principal writings of this kind are the "Teaching of the Twelve Apostles" or "Didache", the "Didascalia", based on the "Didache"; the "Apostolic Constitutions", an expansion of the two preceding works; then the "Apostolic Church Ordinance", the "Definitio canonica SS. Apostolorum", the "Testament of the Lord" and the "Octateuch of Clement"; lastly the "Apostolic Canons". Of all this literature, only the "Apostolic Canons" werein cluded in the canonical collections of the Greek Church. The most important of these documents the "Apostolic Constitutions", was removed by the Second Canon of the Council in Trullo (692), as having been interpolated by the heretics. As to the eighty-five Apostolic Canons, accepted by the same council, they rank yet first in the above-mentioned "Apostolic" collection; the first fifty translated into Latin by Dionysius Exiguus (c. 500), were included in the Western collections and afterwards in the "Corpus Juris"."
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.201.25.60 (talk • contribs) .
:?209.78.19.130 20:41, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Catholic Enyclopedia

message: In the first sentence the article states, "...collection of eight treatises which belongs the...", which does not make sense. I believe it should read "...which belongs to the...", as this makes the most sense to me, but as I am no scholar of RC theology I cannot be 100% certain (just 99.9%). Regardless it is incorrect English as it stands and needs to be fixed by someone who doesn't somehow manage to unintentionally fuck up articles every time he tries to fix anything the way I do. This is not the only error in the introduction, much less the entire article, but it is the most glaring one I have noticed. GlassDeviant (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article introduction does not make sense. 
Talk:Leszynski naming convention

message: Who is this Leszynski that (presumably) came up with this notation? » Christopher | Talk | 08:42, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: I've added a "Disadvantages" section. I've wikilinked Case Sensitivity for "mixedCase" but is there a better wikilink than that? I tried "mixed case" literally but that went straight to Capitalization which didn't seem such a good match. (Northernhenge (talk) 21:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How about CamelCase? Classical geographer (talk) 07:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: That's spot on. I'd never heard of that term before. Thank you. Northernhenge (talk) 10:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Disadvantages

message: The noted advantage of the database being self-documenting is not true.
One of the objectives of self-documenting code is for it to be readable, which Hungarian notation and thereby Leszynski notation is not according to * </blockquote>
Jespertp (talk) 07:16, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Advantages
Talk:Pipe and tabor

message: is it soft or loud???
:It's loud. --Aaron Walden  09:53, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unfortunately, the note stating "copyright: I have tried to locate copyright holders and gain appropriate permissions. However if you feel I have infringed your copyright in any way please contact me" makes this impossible. Wikipedia cannot link to sites which do not have explicit permission to host their content. If you limit the material on the site to that for which you have permission, then I think we should be able to link to it. Yworo (talk) 20:32, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Basti division

message: Basti division is an administrative division in Uttar Pradesh state. Basti city is the headquarters of this division. Basti, Siddharthnagar and Sant Kabir Nagar districts are the parts of Basti division. And Basti is not carved out from Gorakhpur division. Basti is a separate division and Gorakhpur is a separate division in Uttar Pradesh. Ayodhya-prayagraj (talk) 16:17, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basti division
Talk:The Cult of Ray

message: Could some knowledgeable Wikipedian please make a redirection page so that anyone who searches for "Shazeb Andleeb" lands here? Martin Rundkvist (talk) 16:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Done.  The page was previously deleted as someone had set it up as a memorial page.  It should be OK as just a redirect.  In future, FYI, type Shazeb Andleeb in the search box, click go and it will come up in red with a question if you want to create the page.  Click on it, and then type #REDIRECT The Cult of Ray in the text area (not in bold and The Cult of Ray needs to be linked ) and hit save.  Done.  S'easy peasy. Tuffle (talk) 08:32, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Shazeb Andleeb redirection page
Talk:Dyson tree

message: I believe that an atmosphere-sustaining plant on Luna was a centerpiece in the juvenile SF novel "The Lotus Caves" written in 1969 by John Christopher, but I don't have a copy on hand in order to check the details. --Woozle 21:34, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  earlier related idea 

message: Perhaps we should mention Darren Aronofsky's The Fountain as a film featuring a spacefaring tree. I mean, especially if we're going to count the forest dome in Silent Running as a "tree". :) --Quuxplusone (talk) 09:10, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[The Fountain]] 

message: Larry Niven's Integral Trees seem to fit also.
Scott McNay (talk) 01:22, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Integral Trees 

message: The skunk cabbage in the introduction is a link to a disambiguation page, which is a bit sad.
Of the plants on that list, I think that 
Western skunk cabbage
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symplocarpus_foetidus
is the only thermogenic plant.
222.152.27.40 (talk) 08:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Skunk Cabbage 

message: Link to Dyson Trees (called Praeses in universe) in the comic by Jeph Jacques.
:Episode One
: 47.186.3.200 (talk)  — Preceding undated comment added 19:04, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alice Grove
Talk:Council of Elders

message: Forgive me if I have an anarchonistic memory, but isn't this term part of the Ancient Spartan government? -- Natalinasmpf 09:37, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

message: I recently watched something on television that stated Richard Branson, with some world leaders including Nelson Mandela, started a group which was referred to as a 'Council of Elders' for international rights, 12 of them or so, this group was started on Branson & Mandela's shared birthday apparently. Nagelfar 00:39, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Modern international 333<ref><nowiki>Insert footnote text here</nowiki></ref>organization
Talk:Kamba language

message: Found a page on Ethnologue that has more info, that claims many more native speakers than reported in the article.  http://www.ethnologue.com/show_language.asp?code=kam  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.117.86.138 (talk) 18:22, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Information page on Kamba language on Ethnologue.

message: If you are a native speaker of Kikamba then you can help translate this template into your own language:
 Edit
--Amazonien (talk) 22:30, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Kikamba language template
Talk:Jesse Boot, 1st Baron Trent

message: "John Boot offered his close friend and business associate John Harston, the opportunity of going into business with him, but Barrett declined, feeling the venture was not worth investing in" - the 2 halves of the sentence seem to refer to different people.  Is "Barrett" the same person as John Harston, or is something missing here? Rodparkes (talk) 05:22, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Probable Error 
Talk:Methuen Publishing

message: According to the British Library Methuen & Co. Ltd also published the first edition of H.G. Wells's World Brain in 1938.
This entry is so hopelessly out of date and inaccurate that it should probably be removed for the time being - Methuen has been split into numerous entities with the drama list acquired by A&C Black, and the rump company is no longer at the address listed.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.133.114.144 (talk) 10:37, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This article doesn't only contain current publisher information. As a major UK publishing house, the complete history of their names, imprints, editors, addresses, co-publishing agreements, buyouts, sales, etc. belongs here.(mercurywoodrose)75.61.132.46 (talk) 04:08, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: http://books.google.com/books?id=gjLVAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Title	Through Asia, Volume 1
Through Asia, Sven Anders Hedin
Author	Sven Anders Hedin
Editor	John Thomas Bealby
Edition	2
Publisher	Methuen & co., 1899
Original from	Indiana University
Digitized	May 6, 2009
Subjects	Asia, Central
Rajmaan (talk) 21:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sven Hedin's books 
Talk:LMS Coronation Class

message: Is there any point in mentioning BR experimental blue livery twice in the liveries section? Or is it me being a bit pedantic? 
(Bulleid Pacific 21:44, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The BR experimental blue livery is not mentioned twice. The experimental blue is mentioned once, the standard blue is mentioned once. The experimental blue is ignored by Mannion and Sixsmith in their books but Jenkinson states it was carried by 7 locomotives. These 7 were painted in 1948 and were in a paler blue to the BR standard blue and had initially black and yellow lining, later changed to black and white. These 7 are considered by Jenkinson as the prototypes for the BR standard blue. The standard blue was adopted in 1949, a year later, which backs up Jenkinson thoughts on the 1948 scheme. The standard blue was not experimental, it was meant to be a standard livery for the bigger passenger locomotives, but due to it's poor performance in traffic in was decided to abandon it in 1951. Gawthorpe Dave 19:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Blue livery

message: "They were the most powerful passenger steam locomotives ever to be built for the British railway network"
I would dispute this. The LNER Class P2 article makes the same claim, and is listed as having a higher tractive effort (43'462 lbf vs 40'000 lbf).
86.20.206.100 (talk) 20:09, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Tractive effort is not a measure of power. It is a theoretical calculation of the maximum force which the locomotive could exert on starting, based upon just five values: rated boiler pressure; cylinder bore; piston stroke; number of cylinders; and driving wheel diameter. Although it typically allows for 15% losses, it does not scientifically take into account a large number of other factors which affect the power which may be exerted, such as the capacity to boil water, superheating, internal resistance of steam passages, leaks therefrom, number of driven wheels in contact with the rail, mechanical stiffness, rail friction, coal quality, skills of driver and fireman. TE has often been used to compare locomotives, but this is erroneous: the only fair test is a direct trial, either on a testing plant, or out the line. --Redrose64 (talk) 20:33, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most powerful pasenger loco? 

message: I've just found a copy of Jenkinson (1982), , and although there are plate numbers, there are no page numbers. Where have these come from in all the references to this book? (User:Redrose64 editing whilst logged out - public library) --194.81.226.131 (talk) 18:42, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I confirm that the above post was by me, logged out. It's mainly for the attention of . --Redrose64 (talk) 23:52, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page numbers in Jenkinson 1982
Talk:Central Foreign Affairs Commission

message: When was this committee instituted? I've been planning to write an article on external relations of CCP post-1962. Could that material be posted here? --Soman 10:07, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Category talk:Incorporated cities and towns in California

message: Do note that most cities in California have websites whose URLs are typically in the form of http://www.ci.city-name.ca.us/
--Geopgeop 10:09, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Typically form for city URL's 

message: I've proposed merging :Category:Towns in California into this category. The State of California makes no distinctions on the size of their cities like many Northeast US states do. The only big difference are those that are general law cities, and those that are charter cities. :Category:Towns in California seems to be an odd mix of incorporated cities, unincorporated communities, and ghost towns. 
There is already the semi-overlapping :category:Census-designated places in California and :category:Unincorporated communities in California. Communities that fit into those categories should be moved. Incorporated cities should be moved into this category. BlankVerse 09:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge proposal

message: Should this category be considered a parent category with all articles being restricted to the county sub category they belong to? Dbiel (Talk) 03:07, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parent Category 

message: There are said to be 481 cities/towns in California.   This category is missing one of them with only 480 articles directly included in this category.  How to find it?  Hmains (talk) 18:04, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: missing one article
Talk:Milt Schmidt

message: For the '39-40 season, Schmidt, Bauer, & Dumart were the NHL's top 3 scorers, a feat only repeated 2x more.  Trekphiler 19:29, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have assessed this as Start Class, as it contains more detail and organization than would be expected of a Stub (although it requires more referencing and in-line citations), and of low importance, as I do not feel that many people outside of hockey fans would be familiar with the subject of the article. Cheers, CP 15:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment
Talk:Existence of God/Archive 1

message: [copy-and-pasted by crazyeddie 03:54, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The Concept of God in Other Cultures

message: ----
[copy-and-pasted by crazyeddie 03:54, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: With any of the proposed titles for the combined article, a reader who types "Existence of God" into the search bar will find it, since that is a phrase contained in all proposed titles.  Having said that, I do agree that brevity is preferred, I just think that "Existence of God" is slightly misleading, where "Arguments about the existence of God" is not.  Overall not a big deal for me, though.  Zashaw 01:59, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Renaming the Article

message: Any objections to making Arguments for the existence of God and Arguments against the existence of God redirects to Existence of God? crazyeddie 5 July 2005 18:41 (UTC)
Clarification: Last I checked, there was a pretty clear consensus in favor of the merger. So I'm not actually asking "Is this a good idea?", but "Should we do this now or wait a bit?" crazyeddie 6 July 2005 18:27 (UTC)
go for it!
(One revert later...) Okey dokey, I'll ask it again. Is there anything that still has to be done (aside from removing the links back to the original unmerged articles, which need to stay up until the merger is complete) before we make Arguments for the existence of God and Arguments against the existence of God redirects to Existence of God? crazyeddie 08:48, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Last Call

message: Is this a "complete" (as in, attempting to record all or most of the important/popular arguments) list of arguments for and against he existence of God; or is there another list in another article that is perhaps more complete, or a list that is similar in terms of subject? Is there another article with a set of arguments for and against something related to creationism & evolution / atheist & non atheist controversy? Basically, I am looking for all the lists of arguments for and against the existence of god, evolution, creationism, religion, theology, theism, etc., etc.  I had a very hard time even looking for this article; and finally found it --- there needs to be some directory of articles for the type of people (agnostic or skeptical) who wouild like to view both sides of views; a directory full of articles with lists of in depth arguments, like this article, all dealing with related subjects. -unsigned
Feel free to read this article and its sources and contribute to the article if you find it lacking. Citing references is a good thing, even if this article is lacking in tying data to the sources. WAS 4.250 16:34, 25 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Finally, a List? 

message: What about the "proof" that god does not exist from the Hitchhiker's guide to the galaxy.  It says something about god disproving himself, therefore he couldn't exist.  Just a thought... :-)
--Kmill 19:10, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: we could mention it as a notable parody of proofs of God. dab (ᛏ) 19:15, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Hitchhiker's Guide
Talk:List of British divisions in the First World War

message: On the pages which lead from here, in which the several divisions are described, the first heading is "Unit History". In those articles I have seen, there is little under this heading as yet but there is a great deal of scope for filling it out. I suggest that the "Unit history" should be placed after "Battles". In this way we should have the summary of the division before the detail of its work. We should know what we were reading about before we engaged in a long history.
Unless I find a strong argument against this, I shall move the headings in the divisional pages accordingly. (RJP 10:35, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is there any reason why the 63rd (Royal Naval) Division is marked as a New Army division?  Surely if there was ever a good candidate for "Other" this unique outfit (Royal Navy and Royal Marine personnel serving under command of the War Office) would be it!
TomboPC (talk) 22:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  63rd (Royal Naval) Division
Talk:Pacifier

message: Dummy vs pacifier. This article suggests that dummy is a slang term and pacifier is the correct term. Dummy is the common term outside of America, it isn’t a slang term. Americans call it a pacifier and most of the rest of the world calls it a dummy 103.234.250.1 (talk) 05:37, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @103.234.250.1 a fair observation 2404:4408:7328:FA00:46A9:C5C8:84FE:FE3A (talk) 09:03, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dummy vs pacifier