Talk:Stitch (Disney character)

message: Isn't the current picture a bit too big? I liked the old one where Stitch is riding in the spacecraft 85.1.27.141 (talk) 16:59, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: From th info page, it says we were never seen Stitch getting hit by a bullet but I disagree.  In the movie "Lilo & Stitch", right at the intro where he was at the cell with the genetic plasma gun, Gantu fired a shot at Stitch and we actually witness Stitch catching the plasma "bullet" (or energy sphere) and throws back to him.  So that should well reveal Stitch's bulletproof ability.
 
Wrong!Duh!If you watch the movie,in that "intro" scean,Gantu said,"These guns are locked onto your signal. They won't shoot anyone,but you!
[Stitch bites him]Gantu:Why, you...!" The scean where Stitch catches the "bullet" was when Jumba followed  him into Lilo's house telling him, "We got fired this Morning!New rules! (Shots bullet at Stitch]Stitch:Ha!Hee,hee,hee! OW!!OW!!OW!! "
Other than that,you're right.70.146.241.91 00:12, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Stitch's bulletproof ability?!

message: why the language section was deleted. if anyone can't remember it, I have inserted it here:==Language==   
- Here are some samples of Stitch's language, with translations where available. Some come from the movie, some come from the official website of Lilo and Stitch: The Series.   
-    
- *Meega Nana Queesta- No translation, although it is probably vulgar, disguting, or both it ebhadfvhdsHDFGFHDFHDFGDDHJGHGadDDhhdgjhcvddckjwdvjfvjwfjbfjbjgkjbkgjbjdgbjgbjdlkfj (it made a robot throw up). True. Although,on the Lilo & Stitch article,they said in the Chinese vershon[I can't spell that,either]they translated it because it sounds like "Ni Qu Du",an offensifa[Agian, I can't spell it right]phrase meaning "Go away!" and the Grand Conclol[Another I can't spell] Women's response was,"So nauty!!" "Stitch laughs manicly[can't spell] Jumba:I didn't teach him that!"70.146.241.91 00:37, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Worth noting: Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --Jtalledo (talk) 03:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: I just want to know...

message: Ok, so Stitch can lift 3,000 times his own weight. So how much does he actually weigh? I know a Koala weighs around 12 pounds, a 6 year old child weights about 50 pounds. Stitch's weigh seems to be somewhere between the two. Does anybody know for sure? Joylock 06:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Well we know it can't be terribly much. Lilo and Nani are seen picking him up with ease, so its proboably closer to the weight of the Koala. We don't know for sure, though. -ZeroTalk 07:07, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have never seen Stitch lift a building off of it's foundation or throw an airplane like a frisbee, what episodes are these in?24.56.227.108 (talk) 05:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: A deleted scene from the movie did show him on an alien planet, where he lifted a building up, but that's it. I also can't recall him ever throwing an airplane.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.133.206.205 (talk) 00:43, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Lifting Weight

message: Can we verify that Angel plays a role in Leroy and Stitch? -—Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.200.116.131 (talk • contribs) 
::I don't know. Unless someone can provide some logical edvidence I'll remove it. -ZeroTalk 05:32, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Angel 

message: Shouldn't the Disney World Ride: Stitch's Great Escape be mentioned in this article?
69.136.68.213 18:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disney World 

message: Restored changes to the infobox. The new image is better - it's more clear, correctly tagged with source info and it's not like Stitch runs around in his space suit for the majority of the series. He's a Disney character so the Disney character box is more appropriate. All the other info from the box is mentioned in the article as prose. --Jtalledo (talk) 04:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't see any reason why the hero infobox shouldn't be apropriate. It retains all of the inane trivia that previous parties attempted to insert in the article in a concise and manageable format. Stich is also a comic book character and with his hero status (such as in Kingdom hearts) and abilities that rival such characters like the Hulk and Dr. Doom I would think its much more fitting. As for the image, If people are happy with that, feel free to add it to the lower pharagraph, but its a depiction of his "dog" form and is not the real character. I also think the image should be deleted as redundant and would prefer one with his laser pistols, if possible. -Randall Brackett 10:45, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: What trivia? Everything in the infobox is already in prose in the article. Plus, that image doesn't have a proper source and is blurry. Reverted again. --Jtalledo (talk) 11:44, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Hm... you know, instead of reverting, you could have just cut and pasted the old infobox code. That revert wiped out my merger of two sections and the addition of a category. --Jtalledo (talk) 11:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

text: Hmm, you still have not answered to my argument. The image looks fine to me. I'm sorry you like the latter which doesn't refelct the true character. I would like to know what having the disney box tells the reader anymore than this does. -Randall Brackett 11:52, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox 

message: :Image:Stitch red one.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 20:12, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Stitch red one.jpg

message: :Image:KH2Stitch.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:KH2Stitch.jpg

message: The article makes several statements that cannot be verified (and some are flat out false) about Stitch's abilities:
He does NOT have a sword. He never appears with a sword in any of the four movies or the series.
He cannot run on water. According to the first movie, he can't even float in it.
The numbers given for his weight and top speed (110 pounds and 190 miles per hour, respectively) are both unverifiable.
He is never shown having a 'Flamer Punch' or ninja skills. He can climb on walls though.
He doesn't have green blood in the series (the episode in question, Snooty, was referring to mucus, not blood.)
Also, pictures are needed for this article. It should be fair use to have a picture showing what he looks like, as long as it's an official picture that's uneditted. After all, fair use covers something you can't portray without using copyrighted material, doesn't it?
70.156.27.15 (talk) 20:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Severe vandalism in the article. 

message: :Image:Stitch13.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 06:30, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Stitch13.JPG

message: The image :Image:PreStitch.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here.  In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page.  Please check
:* That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
:* That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --22:37, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Image copyright problem with Image:PreStitch.jpg

message: I come with this proposal to merge this article into the List of characters for several reasons. First of them, this proposal comes to attend the tags in the article about the lack of sources, especially in third-party publications, which are necessary to establish notability. Stitch has made many appearances but all of them are within Disney media. The article needs to prove the notability of the character outside the Lilo & Stitch franchise and other Disney media, by receiving coverage by reliable third-party sources and impact in popular culture. Thoughts? --LoЯd ۞pεth 10:32, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Against merge. You know as well as I do that I want sources for this character as well. But still he's a notable character that still has potential. − Jhenderson 777 15:37, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: "Potential" is nothing if notability is not established within the article. The point of merger and deletion discussions is not to convince the other part of something, but to improve the articles. If the Stitch article does not show the "potential" notability, then it corresponds to the list along with the other characters. --LoЯd ۞pεth 06:03, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Normally I would agree with something like this. But due to him being a major no brainer Disney icon, my vote still stands. And no offense, you spend your time merging these type of articles like these, why don't you spend your time trying to help them instead. − Jhenderson 777 15:51, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: I went away and merged it until some reliable sources could be found. Sorry if I sounded a bit mean or anything because I wasn't trying to be. − Jhenderson 777 01:22, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal