lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Cornelio Saavedra

message: This article has lots of mistakes. It says that Moreno accused Saavedra of conspiracy. Guess what...Mariano Moreno died in 1811. But no, I won't change it. I might be violating copyrigth.--furgonero 22:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If they are, please reference them appropriately. Otherwise, they may be assumed to be Original Research Sebastian Kessel Talk 23:42, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Untitled 

message: Cornelio Saavedra's mother's name was María Teresa Rodríguez Güiraldes <https://www.genealogiafamiliar.net/getperson.php?personID=I3708&tree=BVCZ>. She was in turn the daughter of Pedro Lorenzo Rodríguez and Tomasa Güiraldes Michel <https://www.genealogiafamiliar.net/getperson.php?personID=I282&tree=BVCZ>.
200.12.130.151 (talk) 10:37, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cornelio Saavedra's mother 

message: The Spanish version of this article says the charges against him were dropped in 1818, whereas the English page says 1815. Neither has a citation, so I'll try to find it in the sources. Burritok (talk) 21:55, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Update: changed the year on the English page to 1818 and added a reference. Burritok (talk) 23:16, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Charges dropped
Talk:Radio Havana Cuba

message: Regarding the discussion below whether the station should be listed as "Radio Habana" or "Radio Havana," I got used to "Radio Habana" from all mail they sent me after I sent them a letter in the 1960's asking for a card to verify my reception (i.e., a QSL card).  Because searching wikipedia for either "Radio Havana" or "Radio Habana" gets you to the same article, it does not matter to me which is the fundamental reference.
I have a question, though, about the mediumwave broadcasts mentioned in the article.  I don't remember RHC broadcasting above 1000 kHz, but I do remember RHC broadcasting in the morning hours in English in the early 1980's at some frequency between 800 and 900 kHz, as I recall.  These broadcasts were easily audible on a home-quality AM radio in north Florida (Tallahassee) where I live.  Does anyone have a reception log from that period that can fill details?  JonEAhlquist 02:01, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: However, is "Radio Havana Cuba" used more than "Radio Habana Cuba" in English? Ryūlóng 22:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

text: In fact, the google hits for "Radio Habana Cuba" are more numerous than those for "Radio Havana Cuba" (and searching for "Radio Havana Cuba" gives results that are "Radio Habana Cuba"). Ryūlóng 22:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Also, the naming policy states that other language titles should only be used if the native form is more commonly used in English than the English form. Therefore, if we are going to use search engine results as a kind of measure what you did was incorrect. We should be looking at search results in English language websites. Thus limiting our results to English-language websites we get the following results "Radio Habana Cuba": 31,200 hits  and "Radio Havana Cuba": 45,600 hits --Jersey Devil 22:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I still think that the English limited search is still fairly close for a move to the English name of the city. However, it would probably be best for the name to use "Havana" now that I think of it. As long as the Spanish name is utilized in the first line, then I think everything will be fine. I'll move the page now. Ryūlóng 23:07, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

text: Just a litte more info here; I sometimes listen to the English language Radio Havana broadcasts on shortwave and the hosts indentify it as "Radio Havana."  That doesn't necessarily mean "Radio Havana" is the offical English language name, just like "BBC" isn't the offical name of the British Broadcasting Company. --Oakshade 21:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Yamaha YZR-M1

message: A few bits of this page need changing...
"came to the track in 2002, with Max Biaggi who had arrived from Honda onboard".
This is a bit misleading I think, Max moved to the works Yamaha team for the 1999 season, though he had ridden a privateer Kanemoto Honda NSR in 1998.
Here's a good page with some Biaggi info :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Biaggi
The bike had a podium finish in it's first race in the hands of Carlos Checa after he contested a drenched Japanese Grand Prix (Max crashed out at the Spoon Curve) but the race wins at Brno and Sepang were both on a dry track - if you remember, at Brno Rossi's rear tyre chunked while he was chasing Max down, he cleared off in Malaysia to leave Rossi, Barros and Ukawa to fight amongst themselves.  Prior to that Yamaha had brought a new frame (their fourth IIRC) to Le Mans which Max used to get 3rd place, he then got more podiums at Italy (2nd), GBR (2nd) and GER (2nd).  The Brno bike had another new frame and also a very different fairing, Biaggi was fastest all weekend.
"In the 2003 season Biaggi became almost nonchalant and open rather than discrete on his comments of how bad and useless the bike was, and if only he could be on a Honda, how everything could be OK"
Max Biaggi was on a Honda in 2003, the Sito Pons run, Camel Pramac bike with Ukawa as his team mate.  Yamaha's riders that yeat were Alex Barros, Carlos Checa, Marco Melandri, Olivier Jacque and Shinya Nakano.
It might be worth pointing out that Rossi also won the BMW at the 2004 pre season IRTA test at Catalunya in spite of a strong Honda challenge. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jensen1972 (talk • contribs).
Finally got round to addressing all the factual errors you had highlighted. playbike 11:01, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Minor changes 

message: 157 kg weight, excluding driver. 200 kg weight including driver.
Not realistic at all. Where does the latter number come from? Cant' be serious.
--2.205.255.63 (talk) 22:14, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weight Issue 

message: I'll try to do some research on this.  It's a great article up to 2012 - then it just ends.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZeroXero (talk • contribs) 17:33, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can anyone add narrative post 2012?
Talk:Mike Gonzalez

message: No one calls him Michael, period. Chris Nelson and at least 3 other people agree. If Blahblahblbah continues to go by his own rule with total disregard to consensus and factual evidence that prove him wrong, he will be blocked. Go read any MLB related stories. His name is Mike. Get over it. It's like calling Wesley Matthews Wes Matthews Jr. It doesn't matter what their birth names are. Good luck changing Tony Parker's name to Anthony Parker.--NWA.Rep (talk) 22:59, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You consider this nitpicking sources??? My point is that everyone that currently matters have changed from calling him Mike to Michael - just because ESPN, etc didn't get the memo that he wants to go by Michael now.... Just because 2 Florida Marlins fans know him as Mike and don't realize he goes by Michael now revert the change doesn't mean there's a consensus.  And saying I have an obsession because I'm just going by what his current employer and their local media call him is absurd. Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 00:09, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: AP calls him Michael too - in articles on ESPN nonetheless . It's pretty clear he's going by Michael now - and the mainstream sites haven't bothered to change his page. Blahblah32blahblah (talk) 00:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: There have plenty of people who change their name, Adam Jones was called Pacman and he changed it too Adam cuz off all of the negative name conatations, but people still call him Pacman nevertheless. DJ Ware was called Danny for his entire career, but changed it last year for a new image and the only website that calls him DJ is the Giants official roster. ESPN and the NFL rosters still list him as Danny. Plus their is a Tony Parker and a Anthony Parker, two different NBA players, it would make no sense for them to go by the same name when they play in the same league. Ositadinma 00:41, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Plus alot of no name players on MLB.com 40-man roster are or used to be listed by their birth names - Zachary Phillips, goes by Zach, but MLB.com will not change it to Zach until when or if he makes his debut. MLB.com listed Gonzalez as Mike for a couple of weeks until he changed it to Michael, then it started listing him as Michael Gonzalez cuz he is a well established player. Ositadinma 00:51, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  His name is Mike
Talk:College rock

message: The Descendents are decribed as a college rock band so i added them to the list here. You might want to consider starting  Category:College rock. Just something to think about for the future. Word! Xsxex 22:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Technically most every alt-rock band during the 80s could be considered college rock, with the exceptions of industrial rock and most goth. It's best to only list the bands most associated with the term (R.E.M., Husker Du, Replacements, and so forth). Ramones definitely don't count. The Last.fm tags are useless since they're user-based and in no way objective. WesleyDodds 21:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  August 2006 

message: For reference, here's the list that was recently removed from the article.  Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 16:11, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The List 

message: Provide a basis for define college rock strictly within a single decade.  GenacGenac (talk) 17:29, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  mmm 1980s? 

message: Google books link to All music guide to rock: the definitive guide to rock, pop, and soul (print edition): Morrissey entry (see page 1033 for The Smiths entry).  The link was too long to put in the comment when I recently restored both to the article, after someone claimed they didn't fit the College Rock aesthetic. -- Foetusized (talk) 14:38, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Morrissey & The Smiths as College Rock 

message: The quote from the New Republic regarding "tens of thousands of kilowatts" is obviously a misprint (i.e., the original article is a misprint). What is the acceptable way to indicate that mistake in the Wikipedia quote? Tedd (talk) 04:58, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed that part of the quote, as it is clearly wrong. My guess is that it was intentionally false, though possibly "watts" instead of "kilowatts" was meant. The TNR piece was written by Ian Svenonius, and a glance at the WP article on Ian might be instructive. This article on College rock is credulously taking something written by a known satirist at face value, and perhaps still relies too much on that piece. Not everything he says is wrong, but I'd take a lot of it as opinion and with a bit of salt. CAVincent (talk) 04:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Can we fix "tens of thousands of kilowatts"?
Talk:Operation Iron Fist

message: Killerman2 reverted my redirecting of this page to Lord's Resistance Army (2002-2005).  This page is a copy and paste from that article (without attribution in an edit summary or anything else, I might add) with a military conflict infobox added in.  A detailed account of Operation Iron Fist (and OIF2) would be great, but this article adds no new content.  I see no reason for its separate existence, but am willing to wait for one before reverting again. - BT 22:40, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  redirect
Talk:Canadian Deaf Theatre

message: A source has been added to the article by another editor, so I have removed the prod tag.  The other claims are sketchy.  The article asserts notabilty in stating that it is the only anglophone deaf professional theatre company in Canada; that is significant.  WP:VAIN may be valid, but I would rather remedy that by editing the article to remove inane family details. --Aguerriero (talk) 21:36, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prod removal
Talk:Cabaret Voltaire (Zürich)

message: In Hans Richter's Dada: Art and Anti-Art, he describes how Hugo Ball acquired the space (he managed to convince the owner that allowing him to use the space would result in higher beer/food sales, and it did).  However, the spot was already operating prior to the Dadaist takeover, so to speak.  I think it's worth mentioning in the article.75.69.110.227 02:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Founded by Hugo Ball?

message: I cleaned up a bit and removed the tag because if you  use the tag you are supposed to explain yourself ("Please discuss this issue on the talk page, or replace this tag with a more specific message").
I understand the article right now is just a stub, so let's expand it! Mujinga 22:48, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Removing cleanup tag

message: The Dada page says Hugo reads the manifesto on July 14, 1916, but this Cabaret Voltaire page says the manifesto was read on July 28, 1916.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.128.223.80 (talk) 16:24, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Inconsistencies regarding the date when Hugo Ball reads manifesto

message: I think this article is primary topic for Cabaret Voltaire. Wikimostafa (talk) 05:51, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree; "long-term significance" at WP:PRIMARYTOPIC and ghits in books and even news would support that. On the other hand, page view statistics (club, band) and general search results are more inconclusive; thus it will not change. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 10:27, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Primary Topic
Talk:Tom Banks (EastEnders)

message: I think this one can be a lot more than plot due to several high profile storylines, especially his death. Definitely some decent interviews that can be included. Question is, should we build upon this in minors or allow to have own article? Either way, i'm going to remove PROD, because it shouldnt be deleted just redirected to a list in worst case scenario.GunGagdinMoan 23:44, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd say it depends on how much information we can find to expand with - if it's quite short, send it to the list, if it's quite long, keep it here! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:59, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

text: I think the character is notable. Doesnt really matter how long he appeared, it's notability that counts and the character was discussed a lot in the media at the time due to a high profile exit. We're getting around to cleaning all these characters up, it's just taking time. Let us look for sources over the next few days and if we dont come up with anything, then we will merge and it can redirected, not deleted. That OK?GunGagdinMoan 13:01, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: OK. That sounds good. -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, done a fair bit, possibly more can be added. I think it can stand alone now. Thoughts? GunGagdinMoan 17:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?
Talk:Georgia Rule

message: I am marking this for clean-up, right now I see a line stating that Lohan's partying was "obviously out of hand," this is an subjective statement and must be taken into context. I do not really know much about the subject but it definitely could use some help. This post by scryer_360, to lazy to sign in and way to overpaid. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.248.200.226 (talk) 05:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup? 

message: The plot summary is a word-for-word amalgamation of the two plot summaries on IMDB: . Anchoress 09:49, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Are you addressing me? Because I didn't remove anything. Anchoress 17:59, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyvio 

message: In which sence is this a comedy-drama film? In my opinion it's a serious film without any comedic element. --Jobu0101 (talk) 15:02, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film labeled as comedy-drama film
Talk:Bert Atkinson

message: This is another character that I feel doesnt warrant their own page. Anyone agree it should be merged with List of EastEnders characters (2006)? Bleaney (talk) 01:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes but like I said, a central discussion is probably better. anemoneprojectors talk 01:13, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger
Talk:Charlie Cotton

message: Charlie's BBC profile gives his first and last appearances as 25 November 1986 and 25 July 1991. However, the official site isn't reliable, and this article says his date of death is 9 July 1991. Can anyone shed any light on his first and last apperances? I'm worried about the first appearance as the last appearance is obviously wrong... -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 16:36, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This says his last appearance was in July 1990. Did he definitely appear in 1991? -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 19:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think that "In July 1991 Dot received news that Charlie had died in a lorry accident but his death was not shown on-screen" means he didn't appear. I couldn't say for sure though. Does his ghostly appearance in The Return of Nick Cotton (2000) count? anemone│projectors 21:00, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: No it doesn't, because it wasn't the actual character, it was a hallucination. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 21:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: His ghost does count in my opinion, because first and last appearances are not in-universe information, it's the date his last episode aired, which is why we have tiffany's last appearance as 31 dec, instead of jan 01, when her DOD is. The character still appeared then, even if it was just a ghost.Gungadin 22:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

text: Do we normally include spin-off information in the infobox? anemone│projectors 22:40, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: We have for Bianca. Gungadin 22:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I thought there was one. I don't suppose there's many it applies to. I'm not sure what I think about it, to be honest. anemone│projectors 00:09, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First and last appearances
Talk:Carol Jackson

message: *No Walford return for Carol JacksonGungadin 23:50, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Sources

message: Can it be confirmed that Carol is still married to Alan after all these years? I think they would be either seperated or divorced.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Alex250P (talk • contribs) 
:What would make you think that? Anyway, is there a reason we think she's using her maiden name now? anemone│projectors 15:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Maritial Status

message: If anyone has info on this or has seen it, can they place an "in other media" section in this article please if possible?GunGagdinMoan 18:04, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: The storyline is canon, but I think you removed it from the storylines section. It's quite trivial in the grand scheme of things so I'll put it in another section, since I own the DVD. Shame there's little potential for it to have its own article, even though the Corrie ones do. Should we do the same for Bianca, Ricky, Tiffany? Those are the main characters involved. It also features... Liam, Max, Pat, Whitney, Morgan, Janine, Stacet, Phil and Ryan. I'll have to watch it again to refresh my memory. anemoneprojectors talk 19:16, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  EastEnders: Last Tango in Walford 

message: I think it is important to put Carol's backstory on the page. Carol and David did go to the same school, as mentioned by Derek and also it was because Derek terrorised the Wickses, that the Wicks family fled in 1976 (remember, Lou Beale mentioned when Simon entered the Square, that she had not seen him in almost 10 years, and that was late 1985). Also, it is mentioned that Derek, Jack and Max were raised in East London and it is pretty clear that the Wickses lived in Walford at the time so it is important to mention that Carol is an East Ender.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.171.221.67 (talk) 20:47, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Backstory
Talk:Joe Bowen

message: Reference 1 link does not resolve.  SquashEngineer (talk) 13:28, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: The Rheostatics sing "Holy Mackinaw Joe" repeatedly in their song "Horses" on the Melville album 50.101.9.121 (talk) 18:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Rheostatics
Talk:Bradley Branning

message: Possible sources:  AnemoneProjectors (talk) 20:40, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: New interviews with Charlie Clements

message: Should Bradley stil be counted as being a current character, since he has moved to Canada?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.194.150.129 (talk) 15:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: He is still a current character. It's just a short break and he will be back soon. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 16:10, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I've just been reliably informed that he will be back on our screens in December. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 16:23, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

text: If it was officially a fall, it doesn't matter how it looked. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 01:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Any fall is accidental, and it's been confirmed as not a suicide. In fact, that was confirmed weeks ago after the Sun said it was going to be a suicide. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 12:23, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

text: Pretty much straight after the Sun's article came out. The official denial is included in this article. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 14:31, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Exit? 

message: This is going to gradually fall out of date if people don't start improving! (I can't as I didn't see the live episode).--90.195.78.179 (talk) 11:23, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Given that the article already reflects the events of the live episode, what exactly is your complaint? Frickative 11:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Er, updates? 

message: OK, people keep changing the page to read "Bradley Branning was a fictional character".  Can we please stop this?
I know the character has died, but just because he's died doesn't mean that he stops becoming a fictional character.  Therefore the page should always read "Bradley Branning is a fictional character".  That's the clearest way I can think of explaining it.  I'm sure if I'm wrong an admin will come along and correct me but I'm sure I'm right :) --5 albert square (talk) 20:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Bradley Branning will never stop being a character from EastEnders, even in a billion years time. Fictional characters, unlike real people, do not cease to exist (well, maybe they would if all the episodes were destroyed and nobody had any copies anywhere in the entire universe). People changing "is" to "was" was the main reason for changing "in EastEnders" to "from EastEnders". Still didn't work though! AnemoneProjectors (talk) 21:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah yes, that's what I was meaning Anemone.  Knew you'd put it better than me!  --5 albert square (talk) 22:01, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Recent updates
Talk:Joe Macer

message: All of these links appear to be dead.  I don't know if the Sun is just having a bad day or what.  But I am under the impression the Sun is not a reliable source in any case, even for slightly less contentious material as behind-the-scenes soap conflicts (the puns in every headline are a red flag that they themselves don't take what they write too seriously).  ZarhanFastfire (talk) 18:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. The Sun have updated their website since 2007 and the pages may be lost or just moved, but old urls don't redirect. The links should be tagged as dead. They may have been archived. If other sources can be found to back up the article, they can be replaced. anemoneprojectors 07:57, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: London ''Sun'' references