lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Moose Mason

message: I am fairly certain that, in an early "Archie" issue, Moose's real name is implied to be Francis "Moose" McGoingle.  I hope to find it and cite it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.226.78.94 (talk) 04:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I remember a two-panel joke in a 1960s comic in which Archie asked Moose what his real name was. IIRC, Moose had to think about it by singing "Happy Birthday to You" to himself before replying, "D-uh, my name is Edgar." Richard K. Carson (talk) 19:49, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  In the 1969 TV special "Archie and His New Pals," Mr. Weatherbee calls him Moose Manson. Coincidentally, it premiered a few weeks after the Manson murders. DollarX (talk) 11:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Monty Are I

message: I Removed Music Importance template, the article now clearly follows the notablity and music guidelines. This band has embarked on numerous national tours and have won two nation wide competitions. I supplied the external links to the sources i used inside the article, including an article in the providence pheonix and the official myspace profile for the takeover records sign my band competition. Reiver 06:12, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This is NOT an encyclopedia type article by any stretch of the imagination.  Incuding and especially the paragrah retaining to their street team.
Indeed, the first section reads like a PR blurb. Additionally, would it be appropriate to move this article to Monty Are I now? Counterfit 22:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I was referring to the appropriateness of the move, DEFINATELY not the tone... and I agree, it's not neutral. - Shuckiduck 10:09, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I would agree that the move is appropriate, as the band now has a CD out under the "Monty Are I" name.  The article needs a lot of work.Bjones 06:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

text: From their website. That copyright violation was up for a whole year. It's been removed. Chubbles 14:35, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV 
Talk:Reggie Mantle

message: I think you need to know, this page is being vandalised.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.187.150 (talk) 16:07, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism 
Talk:Midge Klump

message: According to the official page, she seems to be named Clump with a C. 惑乱 分からん 12:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: This is true, but in most of comics printed so far her last named is spelled "Klump". There are many inconsistencies in the Archie Comics Universe. I'll add an alternate spelling of her last name Flowertea 04:42, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: There's a paragraph about a story with Midge's cousin, Flora. This part doesn't have to do with Midge's character exactly, so I am removing it. Here is the original text: 
Midge has a cousin named Flora Fortune, whom Moose knows. When Reggie sees Archie with Flora--who resembles Midge closely--he jumps to the wrong conclusion and quickly phones Moose, who is so angry he crushes the receiver in his bare hand! He hurries out to the place where Reggie said "Midge" and Archie were. The girl says, "Moose, how dare you interrupt our conversation?" He recognizes Flora, of course, and then proceeds to pay Reggie back for squealing on Archie.
 Flowertea 04:42, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Overly specific
Talk:Phosphoryl chloride

message: With such a high warning on it's NFPA 704 sticker, I would have thought this article could do with some safety information. It's curious, I link from page to page endlessly on here and constantly see big sections about safety and the words toxic being used to describe things, then I come to PCl3 and this article, regarding two extremely dangerous things, and see two sentences for the former and none for the latter; when they're some of the few chemicals scoring a 3/4 for health impact.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.24.47.178 (talk) 05:10, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: You are welcome and encouraged to consult the MSDS, which is carefully cited in each article.  Wiki-chem decided essentially not to get into the advice and safety business which is more authoritatively and more officially handled by other means.  But we do give very good chemical knowledge, without giving instructions on how to implement the chemistry. --Smokefoot (talk) 06:56, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Safety / toxicology 

message: Regarding the recent comment in the article: From what I understand, free HCl can attack trialkyl phosphates to give RCl and the corresponding phosphorus acid, and so if you want to avoid this you need a proton scavanger.  If you don't add that, you get a product just like you would with PCl5 or SOCl2.  Le Chatelier isn't involved here, because the HCl is not taking it back to a P-Cl bond.  I had thought the phrase "sensitive to attack" made it clear (I didn't talk about any equilibrium), but maybe it's not.  When I write stuff like this, I try to be very concise and not labour the details - but do you think more explanation is needed? 
Regarding the need for a Lewis acid, I haven't run the reaction myself so I don't know.  However I lifted this information and the MgCl2 example straight from the references I used.  I suspect that you can do it either with a Lewis acid or with a base, but perhaps the MgCl2 conditions are the more usual if they were listed in the books I used.  I don't have all of those books to hand, but I know I had G&E and 2 or 3 phosphorus books all laid out in front of me when I wrote that section.
Thanks a lot for your comments and scrutiny.  Funny to think we didn't even have this article at all four months ago! Cheers, Walkerma 04:35, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  HCl and trialkyl phosphates
Talk:Reconstruction of Germany

message: It seems like this was written by a naitive German speaker, or someone who doesn't have a complete grasp of English.  I may come back to it later when I have time. Optimusnauta 06:25, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

message: Ok, sorry that I just play the bad anonymus guy bursting into this, but as I am german myself my first thought when I read this article was that this has to be the work of a bitter german who tries to make germans after WWII look more like victims then they actually deserve. Especially the part with all the germans dying as a direct consequence to war reparations (in capital and industry, not territory). Sounds like it comes directly from the NPD
3.11.2008  —Preceding 
unsigned comment added by 90.44.67.231 (talk) 21:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: German!

message: Certainly the Germans suffered terribly during and after ww2.  That should not be discounted.  However, this article seems extremely biased against the Western Allies.  For example, the parts about the Western Allies dismantling German industry and using slave labor after war's end did not sound right. Also, I was not aware that East and West Germany needed the Western Allies' permission to re-unite in 1991. Am I wrong?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MileHigh54 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article is biased 

message: The article as it stands today is disgraceful. In addition to the misleading and biassed statements noted by earlier posters but not corrected or deleted, it is unclear whether it is discussing the Soviet zone, the Western zones or the totality of post-Potsdam Germany. In detailing the devastation and deportations Germany suffered, it fails to note that much of Europe had just undergone similar or worse experiences at German hands. On prisoners of war in Allied hands, it omits to say that many held in the UK with housing, food and work preferred to be there rather than be repatriated to their ruined and starving homeland. Clifford Mill (talk) 16:55, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disgraceful 

message: The Casualties page says 7.4, not 7.5 . Both references are West-German. The Bundsrepublic didn't have GDR data.Xx236 (talk) 07:33, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  7.5 million Germans had been killed 

message: The lead does not explain the reasons of the destruction - Germany started the war and failed to surrender. How many of the victims were killed directly by the German state - handicapped, Jews, anti-Nazi activists, deserters?Xx236 (talk) 07:37, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor Germans ?
Talk:Mushroom management

message: No mentioning of Kidder, Tracy. The Soul of a New Machine. Back Bay Books, 2000. ISBN 0-316-49197-7. I thought this book made the phrase popular.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.141.74.52 (talk) 10:36, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Soul of a New Machine 

message: The overwhelming message of this article is that mushroom management is bad, with a tacked-on paragraph at the end offering the possibility of "good mushroom management". I think this emphasis on good and bad is poor style for an encyclopedia article. Rather, we should be discussing impacts and consequences, and reasons why managers choose to pursue or avoid this management style. IMHO, the article needs a total rewrite due to this issue. Daask (talk) 15:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Value Judgement
Talk:Pro-mia

message: Should this be combined with Pro-Ana to make Pro-ED with redirects from both?
:Yes. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C]  AfD? 21:11, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. I'm proposing to merge this page with pro-ana and then get it moved to pro-ED if consensus dictates. Pittising 16:56, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

text: Yes. However, It does need to HAPPEN. This article has had a merging-proposal since April, how long before it actually TAKES PLACE?! - (Dorkules 12:57, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yep. Time to merge. 192.114.175.2 (talk) 14:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Template talk:Under construction

message: Description of suggested change: The implied scope of the template is misleading regarding new pages. If a mainspace page requires this template because it is in a state of "being created", new page review norms point to the page requiring removal from mainspace instead. The remaining verbiage seems sufficient for all other use cases in draftspace as well as mainspace.
(I've also supplied a minor copy-editing tweak in my diff.)
Diff:
CE-less diff:
Remsense留 00:05, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Also note  exists. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:52, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 1 December 2023 

message: In other templates, the example of the template would be shown above the documentation, not in the documentation.
=== Changes to be made on the template page: ===
Move the beginning of the includeonly tag to start right before the last #ifeq. (insert between the }}{{)
=== Changes to be made on the doc page ===
 Rusty4321 talk contribs 16:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: and you beat me to part 2! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:29, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Template-protected edit request on 1 January 2024 

message: Rusty4321 talk contribs 16:13, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: and you beat me to part 2! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:29, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Changes to be made on the doc page 

message: Add a parameter alias/equivalent to the "comment" param titled "reason" with the same function. Qwerty284651 (talk) 16:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: * Pppery * it has begun... 19:52, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Edit request 28 May 2024
Talk:238th Street station

message: I noticed that this page copies a line written exactly from its source "A whimsical touch is a covered entrance at the yard end in the form of the front end of a train, with entry from the front and not the side doors" and I just wanted to know if you copied this with permission. If not, can you pharaphrase it? Thanks, I Am Ri¢h!  My Rich Contributions/My Wealthy Talk  —Preceding undated comment added 06:55, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Acura Legend

message: Although the Legend served as Acura/Honda's top-spec vehicle, it was not neccesarily a competitor to the top-spec vehicles from other manufacturers. It's realitive small size and emphasis on sporty driving means that vehicles like the Caddy Deville, which are large to very large and have an emphasis on comfort, are not and were not competitive with the Legend. There is also the fact that vehicles like the Deville would have been much more expensive than the Legend; these are the same reasons why it was not competitive with the Lexus LS400 or Audi V8/A8, as these vehciles would be more like the Deville. The Seville, which is smaller and sportier than the Deville, would have been the primary target for the Legend (although I could certainly argue that Caddys do not appeal at all to Acura buyers and vice versa). I'm going to re-lit the Seville as Caddillac's competitor to the Legend, please refrain from changing it back.
Please sign your comments. Thanks! Ste4k 06:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Legend's Competitors 

message: The rationale for the merge request is that the standards adopted by WikiProject Automobiles specify that an article on a given model should be named the way the model is named in the home market. Acura Legend and Acura RL are American-market-only nameplates applied to the same car (made it the same factory) known elsewhere, including its "home" Japanese market, as Honda Legend. Therefore, it is only logical to have all the models and generations described as Honda Legend, with redirects and explanation of North American marketing.
Regards, Bravada, talk - 09:34, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge request 

message: Where is the source of the Type II engine being 260bhp and having 0-60 in 5.7 secs? as far as i know it should be 230-232bhp, and 0-60 was more like 6.7-7.2 sec at best. -- Cirilobeto (talk) 02:03, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Type II engine 

message: Considering how much of the car was a direct result of project xx, it seems stupid to consign it to a trivia section. Could someone work it into the article please.(86.31.184.151 (talk) 14:00, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project XX HX. 

message: Feel free to comment at Talk:Legend (disambiguation)#Merger proposal.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal
Talk:Egon Spengler

message: This should probably be redirected back to the main "Ghostbusters" page. Anonymous-IP-address, it may be better from an organizational point of view to add a "Characters" section to that article. ESkog 00:13, 3 May 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think he is worth of mentioning separately. The Ghostbusters seems to be longish already. --Brand спойт 20:19, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Is anyone ever gonna remove these tags? How many years have to go by?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:3BD8:5E30:53C:4F8E:A483:190 (talk) 16:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The links can be removed once the problems are addressed. If you want the links gone, either address the problems, or remove them with sufficient explanation here on the talk page of why they are no longer relevant. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: January 2015

message: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahZFCF--uRY
He has grandkids. Can only assume he will be shown in some form in the new movie (maybe if only a family picture).  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.195.3.64 (talk) 17:30, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: 2020
Talk:Dénouement

message: From the article:
:In An Inspector Calls, the denouement consists of Mr. Birling receiving a phone call saying that a police inspector is on his way to ask some questions. This comes as a shock to the audience as well as the characters because they had just found out that the police inspector Goole which just left was a fraud.  This is considered a denouement because it occurs at the end of the story and serves to tie up any loose ends that might otherwise interfere with the audience's feeling of completion to the story.
What is the point of this obscure example?  If someone has a clearly illustration of denouement, that might be helpful?  (Posted in the article by User:NickelShoe @ 14:30, 5 September 2005)
:No bleeding clue, love. I guess the author wanted to show off his/her extensive knowledge of An Inspector Class by posting this sneering, arrogant, and altogether priggish example. Or perhaps the author is just an asshole (Posted in the article by 71.114.90.141 @ 22:45, 26 November 2005)
Though still short, I rewrote a good deal of this article, adding new, legit examples and a clearer definition as well as external links.  Although it's still short (and perhaps still considered a stub), hopefully it reads better than it did before.  I'd love to see it expanded!  (Maria 18:41, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course. Go take a look at the entry for A Miracle of Science and read the section on Mad Science. :) Maura Dailey 02:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Example

message: Spoiler alert...Question.  Did LOTF really not have a denoument? I seem to remember that it was a very short one, but it did exist.  Is there a sort of limit on how short a denoument can be to be legitimate?
Yes it did have a denouement, albeit a very short one. Ralph is pursued down the beach by Jack's forces when he meets a marine officer who has come to take them off the island. Realising he is saved, Ralph bursts into tears of relief. Rather dull really.   —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.240.21 (talk) 12:57, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lord of the Flies

message: I really felt that The Deathly Hallows really did not have a Denouement. It kind of just goes right into the epilogue. Anyone agree?
Flem12 03:46, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Harry Potter SPOILER? 

message: It would be helpful to know in which ways this differs from a resolution?  --Eptin (talk) 07:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  vs Resolution? 

message: As far as I know, Pip and Estella never get married.  It is somewhat implied, but certainly does not take place in the book.  I would change it myself, but, I admit,I have only ever read the slightly abridged version from my high school English text book, and I don't want to switch it without making sure I'm right about this.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.184.32 (talk) 01:06, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Great Expectations: Pip and Estella's Marriage?  What? 

message: This word is not found in Google. Is this supposed to be "Peripeteia", which exists on Wikipedia? Quebec99 (talk) 13:46, 31 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peripeteial
Talk:Separate Ways (Worlds Apart)

message: It should also say somethign about how amaxingly bad ass this song is —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.245.145.86 (talk) 02:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Very cool 

message: I remember that this song was the opening track of the Tron soundtrack. The rest of the album had absolutely nothing in common with this song, but it was pretty interesting to see.
Following that a buddy of mine lent me a Journey album, the one where they are sky diving (forgot the title). I did not become a hardcore fan but I discovered them back then.
Maybe we should mention the Tron soundtrack as well. --WhiteEcho 02:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  TRON soundrack 

message: Added Song Infobox per request.  Since the stub had been removed previously, it should not be stub class as that was many edits ago. Still needs some meat to raise the class.  Mikebar 08:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Edits 9-2007

message: Who was the girl in the music video??  Mikebar 08:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Video Q

message: The Heller Family remake of the video is hardly trivial, as per reliable sources:
* https://www.usatoday.com/story/life/2020/04/13/separate-ways-bored-family-re-creates-journeys-classic-music-video/2987012001/
* https://people.com/human-interest/family-recreates-journey-separate-ways-music-video-social-distancing/
* https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/rock/9359194/journey-separate-ways-quarantine-family-recreate
* https://www.today.com/parents/family-recreates-journey-separate-ways-worlds-apart-vide-t178587
* https://news.avclub.com/quarantined-family-recreates-journey-s-fabulously-corny-1842921869
This is five top-tier reliable sources reporting on the remake of the video, three of which (USA Today, People, and The A. V. Clue) are considered very reliable over at WP:RS/P.  It does not matter if a given editor thinks the remake of the video is trivial; top tier reliable sources do not consider this particular remake trivial, so it needs to be part of this article. Samboy (talk) 11:51, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Heller Family remake of the video is hardly trivial
Talk:Chinese sausage

message: The Hong Kong Government calls it lap cheung. , ,  (PDF) (via google) — Instantnood 08:11, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I think someone has a transliterationphobia...a very serious one. -- Jerry Crimson Mann 08:05, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Or perhaps anti-government.. :-P — Instantnood 22:06, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Name

message: Its written fa chong in Suriname. Maarten van Thiel.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A456:2803:1:15AC:A439:AB1:3D2F (talk) 20:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  fashong 

message: 腊肉 is a special type of dried meat made during the winter season (december according to the western calendar? 12th month according to the chinese calendar???). Anyway, this dried-up savory meat is described as being different in taste from regular dried-up savory meat made during other times of the year. I am just bringing it up because it's 腊肉 and this page's food item is called 腊肠. Yrotarobal (talk) 11:50, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  during 腊月 people eat 腊肉
Talk:Architecture in the United States

message: "The United States of America is a relatively young country, and the overriding theme of American Architecture is modernity, with the 20th century skyscraper as its ultimate symbol."
I just got a list of 257 countries of the world and I would say, without actually having done the math, that the USA is older than 2/3s of them.  If you do not believe me please get a list and do it your self.  Please at least do that before you revert my edit.  Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 05:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: I just chopped this out and moved it here

message: I noticed that someone had placed this string of links: 
:: 
under the Beaux-Arts heading.  Do they really belong there?  My gut feeling is NO, but before I start slash and burning them I'd like to hear from you.  Carptrash (talk) 16:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: While fixing some links

message: I re-evaluated the importance scale, as it was ranked as "low-importance" for priority of attention - much lower than many television shows. Considering that American Art and Cuisine are Top Importance (like many "X in the United States" ones), that this broad area (that merits its own wikiproject ; P ) can be overlooked as such, though it may not merit "Top" importance (ergo I put it at "high"). Morgan Riley (talk) 01:26, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Re-evaluated

message: to add something about Spanish rule to the opening paragraph, where we state, " of over four centuries of independence and former British rule.", but I am not sure what link to use for it.  Any ideas?  Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 14:02, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: perhaps I'll use this one for Spanish rule.  Carptrash (talk) 14:04, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am inclined 

message: Please join us on 13 December 2020, 12:00-14:00 EST, as we update and improve articles in Wikipedia related to housing in the United States of America. Sign up here. -- M2545 (talk) 09:23, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Invitation to [[Wikipedia:Meetup/US_housing/December_2020|US Housing Edit-a-thon]] 

message: of the Greek Revival section unless someone wants to explain why it is Greek Revival> Carptrash (talk) 05:45, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just took this picture out