lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:What'll I Do

message: I have a recording of Slim singing an entirely different song with the same title.  Did he ever record this one?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.6.220 (talk) 08:03, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Slim Whitman

message: could this be dated please so we know when "currently" was? thanks--Richardson mcphillips (talk) 01:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: 9 months on and nobody's clarified this, so I've deleted the statement  ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 11:48, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "currently being used in a diet Coke ad"--[[User:Richardson mcphillips|Richardson mcphillips]] ([[User talk:Richardson mcphillips|talk]]) 01:43, 3 May 2009 (UTC) 

message: Great resource this wikipedia is, I am sure you will agree...  81.157.28.79 (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Copyright laws usually restrict the posting of lyrics on Wiki pages. Housewatcher (talk) 04:40, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: And the fucking lyrics are...?

message: I've removed the section about notable recordings: while a lot of work has been done to create it, some of the videos appear to be unofficial uploads so may well breach copyright per Wikipedia's policy on citing YouTube. The article would probably benefit from having the preceding section broken up, with the content from the second paragraph being reformatted into a separate list and merged with this latter section, and the (usable) YouTube references reformatted as footnotes. Below, I've pasted the content which I removed so editors can cannibalise it. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:14, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: "Notable Recordings" section

message: The Background says (without citing a source) that "What'll I Do" was written by Berlin during a forced separation from Ellin Mackay, before they were married. However, the Songfacts article on the song cites a PBS Think Tank episode in which Irving and Ellin's daughter Linda says Ellin expressed her admiration for the song (while getting the title wrong) when they first met.
:Berlin was married to his second wife, Ellin Mackay, from 1926 until her death in 1988. Their daughter Linda Emmet told PBS' Think Tank that this song was the spark that kindled her parents' romance: "My parents met at a dinner party given by a mutual friend. And my mother charmed my father because the first thing that she said to him was, 'Oh, Mister Berlin, I do so like your song, 'What Shall I Do?' And the song, of course, is 'What'll I Do' And so my father made some remark about his grammar not being nearly as good as hers. They took an instant liking to each other and then they started to see each other and when my grandfather got wind of it he disapproved and sent my mother abroad to get over Irving Berlin."''
Thinkatron (talk) 01:40, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Questionable Background information
Talk:Let's Get Together (Chet Powers song)

message: This song was not written by, first performed by, or first recorded by The Youngbloods.  The Youngbloods version should be listed as a cover version, and the article retitled "Let's Get Together (Chet Powers song)".
:Yep. 2001:56A:FB29:D600:1D8:4720:FD62:71BC (talk) 07:14, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Hiddenstranger (talk) 00:17, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misleading article title and framing 

message: WikiParticles exist for "The Mitchell Trio" and "Chad Mitchell" so why isn't that text hotlinked? Wikipedian responsible just go to bed without hot chocolate tonight. I'm harsh but fair.74.64.104.99 (talk) 04:22, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Link please

message: ...was by "The Folkswingers" in 1963?  2001:56A:FB29:D600:1D8:4720:FD62:71BC (talk) 07:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Earliest Recording

message: The Dave Clark Five recorded this song and released it in March 1970.
:216.152.18.132 (talk) 05:28, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dave Clark Five
Talk:State atheism

message: On the article page, the map key reads:
Dark Red: Countries that formerly practiced state atheism
Light Red: Countries that currently practice state atheism
When clicking on the map, the key reads:
Dark Red: Countries that currently practice state atheism
Light Red: Countries that formerly practiced state atheism
I don't know which is accurate, but the discrepancy should be corrected. Captainakira (talk) 04:07, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: They seem to agree when I look at them. Hardyplants (talk) 04:43, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map labeling is inconsistent between views 

message: Are all the "References" listed really used in the article? Editor2020 (talk) 23:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. An editor changed the format from the usual cite referencing format to this. There are numerous pages from the same source used in some of the citations so it seems helpful in that it reduces duplicate referencing.Ramos1990 (talk) 02:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks! Editor2020 (talk) 18:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  References? 

message: Religious people have nearly always discriminated against people of other religions or people of non-religion, Christians, for example have said that anyone who doesn't believe in god, or doesn't believe in the "right" god are going to the fictitious place known as hell. History has proven that religious people have been far more discriminatory and violent. Proletarian Banner (talk) 22:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: That seems irrelevant to state atheism, and doubly irrelevant to this talk page which is improvement of the coverage of state atheism.  North8000 (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issues 

message: Map shows that Cuba currently practices state atheism, while the article says they stopped that practice in 2019. 2603:8000:D341:6100:DD0B:AA23:4B64:4D62 (talk) 04:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map is inconsistent with article
Talk:What About Love

message: Marked as C due to missing Track Listing accord to WikiProject Songs
Hohockjim (talk) 14:00, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

message: I am suggesting to add a question mark as multiple music platforms have it, thanks, Luke Kern Choi 5 (talk) 11:48, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add a question mark 

message: Hi,
just asking if I can add the genre "pop metal" to this song? Stated as being such at this reference: https://www.al.com/life/2021/03/rock-legend-ann-wilson-of-heart-has-been-recording-in-muscle-shoals.html
Thanks! AgentKozak (talk) 15:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add genre "pop metal" to this song
Talk:Get Up, Stand Up

message: Hi.
Does anybody know if the passage in this article about GUSU being specifically about Ras Tafari can be verified? Is this something that Marley and or Tosh spoke of or is written in a primary source somewhere?
Thanks. HPNYC  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.120.251.239 (talk) 01:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: They share the same hook, and Slippin' came out earlier, so presumably Marley and Tosh borrowed it from WAR, but can anyone find a reliable source that confirms this? Thanks ahead of time.Johundhar (talk) 09:42, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: WAR: Slippin' into Darkness
Talk:When the Money's Gone

message: To Gassyguy: hey i understand what you are saying but take a look now... some info about love one another! Rsf7589 02:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but if each song is notable, it should have an individual article. Articles are about songs, not singles. If "Love One Another" deserves coverage as a notable song, it should have a separate article. If it isn't notable, then it needn't be anywhere. Regardless, "When the Money's Gone" merits its own article. This is the same reason separate versions of different songs do not get their own articles. GassyGuy 21:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  About the name 
Talk:Gettin' Jiggy wit It

message: Do people still say that? I guess I'm not cool enough to know. Xiner (talk, email) 03:28, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  
Jiggy
 

message: In pop culture references, the Seinfeld episode aired a little while before the release date of the song. Are we sure the episode refers to this song? (Maybe the song was out on radio before being released as a single or something?)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsteinberg (talk • contribs) 07:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Seinfeld 
Talk:Gilly Gilly Ossenfeffer Katzenellen Bogen by the Sea

message: Should there be commas in this title?  I thought it was all part of the name of the fictional place, so I wouldn't have thought so. --EnglishDez (talk) 20:57, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This reply is rather late to put it mildly, but evidence        overwhelming supports the non-usage of any commas. I will effect the 'move' accordingly.  Thanks - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 13:19, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Title Query

message: The current first paragraph says that the song was published in 1954.
The current last paragraph says that the song was sung on the Jack Benny Show in 1952.
Perhaps one of these dates is incorrect.  If not, perhaps some explanation should be added.
--Wcomm (talk) 06:25, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have removed the following section from the main article as it is confusing, as per the comments above.  If anyone can find better sources that confirm the date as 1954 (it can  not have been in 1952 before the song was published), then please re-insert appropriately.  Frankly, given the time periods between editors comments, I doubt whether anyone will visit this page again this decade ! - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:07, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Publication Date
Talk:Give Me Just a Little More Time

message: It is mentioned in the paragraph?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.102.149.156 (talk) 08:15, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Billboard hot 100 not mentioned in the chart table? 

message: Should this article mention that the b-side, "Do you dare?", was a hit in clubs in its own right? It was included on her Greatest Remixes Vol. 2, and an excerpt from it was included in the Showgirl / Showgirl Homecoming / For You, For Me tours (in the "Smiley Kylie" and "Everything Taboo" medleys).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.255.30.114 (talk) 23:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do you dare? 

message: Since the image, :File:Give Me Just A Little More Time.jpg, has removed by one editor citing WP:NFCC and reverted by two other editors also citing WP:NFCC, I am starting a discussion here so that the image is not deleted simply for being orphaned.
The single cover for the Kylie Minogue cover versiones pass the points of WP:NFCC. WP:NFCC#3 is met because the single covers is used for identification its respective versions and the Chairmen of the Board single cover cannot convey equivalent significant information and/or identification of Kylie Minogue's versions.  WP:NFCC#8 is met because the single cover is used for identification and the image increases readers' understanding and not having it would be detrimental to the understanding of Kylie Minogue's version.  The single cover passes the first example of acceptable use of fair images at WP:NFCI: "Cover art: Cover art from various items, for visual identification only in the context of critical commentary of that item (not for identification without critical commentary)."
The current consensus for single covers in section infoboxes to represent notable cover versions are that they pass WP:NFCC and WP:NFCI. Since WP:SONGCOVER says notable cover versions should be covered in the article about the song and not have its own article, but if it had their own articles, the image would be acceptable there, so it is acceptable in the sections of the song article. The single cover is not alternate covers for the Chairmen of the Board cover, it is the primary cover for Kylie Minogue's version and should be treated as such. If it is felt that the image should still be removed than the image should be taken to Wikipedia:Files for deletion instead of simply removed from the article. Aspects (talk) 18:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use of notable cover version single cover
Talk:Givin' the Dog a Bone

message: 00:07, 30 August 2006
01:16, 14 October 2006
19:13, 19 October 2006
Someone with permissons please change the title of this artivle to it's correct name Given the Dog a Bone. It's not givin', look at the back of the album cover for proof —The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/{|}|{|}]] ([[User talk:{|}|talk]]) {|}
The title is Givin the Dog A Bone, look again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/{|}|{|}]] ([[User talk:{|}|talk]]) {|}
I have my copy of Back in Black (remastered CD version) right here in front of me; the track is listed as "Givin the Dog a Bone"--not "Given" or, surprisingly, "Givin'" either. -an AC/DC fan —The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[Special:Contributions/{|}|{|}]] ([[User talk:{|}|talk]]) {|}
Both the back cover of my CD case and the listing on the CD itself have it listed as "Given" despite the fact that "givin'" would make far more sense. I'm not sure if this is a common typo or if they meant it that way.Mike 03:51, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Glory Glory (football chant)

message: Can anyone add the lyrics of the song here?--Managerarc(talk) 16:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: That is not possible. Since the song was released as a single, its lyrics are copyrighted and cannot be posted here. – PeeJay 01:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lyrics 

message: Man U are only the THIRD English football club to recycle the same basic song so it is hardly original. Wouldn't it make more sense if the article was re-written to encompass all versions of the song in a UK football context. (86.183.56.113 (talk) 22:30, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I would say so - the title could be something like "Glory Glory (football chant)". Either that or redirect them all to The Battle Hymn of the Republic#Other songs set to this tune - it depends if the guidelines say it's noteworthy enough for a separate article, tribal bickering aside. Spurs, Leeds and Man United all released their versions as singles, for what it's worth. - Responsible? (talk) 12:01, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Article scope
Talk:Go Tell It on the Mountain (song)

message: This article claims the song is written by John W. Work (which is the usual attribution), and dates back to 1865. Work was born in 1871, so this combination is unlikely.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adalger (talk • contribs) 19:03, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Initial message 

message: Crabb won Song of the Year for his single "Sometimes I Cry" as well Inspirational Recorded Song for "Joseph."
http://www.christianpost.com/news/battistelli-august-win-big-at-42nd-dove-awards-49926/
Crabb's version of "Go Tell in on the Mountain" is here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zHymcURHww
It should be clear that this is not an award winning recording; start at 1:34, phrase 2 he knows by heart.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.117.123.60 (talk) 19:00, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Crabb's version is not award winning 

message: The articles suggests only two artists have recorded this song in its 'Recording artists' section, instead of the many who have. Looking through its history, the article used to have lists of recording artists but these were removed by Walter Görlitz. I added Simon & Garfunkel to this list but it was reverted by Walter Görlitz. Why was this change reverted and why should the article state/imply something that's not true? Thanks. ToaneeM (talk) 09:00, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Walter kindly linked to WP:COVERSONG in his edit summary. Are you familiar with that policy? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:15, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Ah, I missed that but it's clear as day now I look. Have read it and now understand why the article is as it is. At least this discussion serves as an explanation to others. Thanks very much, Walter Görlitz and Martinevans123.ToaneeM (talk) 13:10, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
replies: text:  It's not a policy though. If a song has few covers, it would be acceptable to list non-charting versions. However, when a song has many renditions, it's best to exclude non-notable cover versions. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:23, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Recording artists' section missing lots of artists
Talk:Go with the Flow

message: I would like to find out the origin of the term "Go with the flow." Does anyone know a good source to find the origin?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.235.253.169 (talk) 00:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Origin of the term 

message: i'd like to say this song isn't honestly about masturbation.  i am going to remove that link as it isn't appropriate to this song at all  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.12.17.53 (talk) 20:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Like to
Talk:God Bless Our Homeland Ghana

message: Why is the lyrics being removed & only referenced. All the national anthems articles that I have seen have the lyrics in the article, not referenced, therefore I dont see any reason why this article should be different.   --81.152.206.5 21:51, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Since the article does contain the words of the anthem, I am rating it start class. Much could likely be added concerning the circumstances of its selection and usage.Gallador (talk) 13:59, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment Comments

message: Back on 25 December, 2008, information was added to the site that, while useful, is unencyclopedic (basically a call to the Ghanian government to recognize Mr. Gbordzoe as the lyricist).  I attempted to edit it down to what should belong in an encyclopedia, a permalink to the page before my edits (including an email link for "inspection of original documents", making me beleive the information was added by Mr. Gbordzoe himself) is here--Canuckguy (talk) 16:20, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michael Kwame Gbordzoe and his quest for government recognition 

message: When I was growing up in Ghana, we sang words to the National anthem that are neither the original version quoted, nor the current version. They were:
1. Lift high the flag of Ghana,
The gay star shining in the sky,
Bright with the souls of our fathers,
Beneath whose shade we'll live and die!
Red for the blood of the heroes in the fight,
Green for the precious farms of our birth-right,
And linked with these the shining golden band
That marks the richness of our Fatherland.
 
2. We'll live and die for Ghana,
Our land of hope for ages to come!
Shout it aloud, O Ghana,
And beat it upon the drum!
Come from the palm-lined shore, from the broad northern plain,
From the farm and the forest, the mountain and mine.
Your children sing with ancient minstrel lore:
Freedom for ever, for evermore!
 
3. God be with us in Ghana
And make our nation great and strong,
Brave to defend for ever
The cause of freesom and of right.
For ever the flag of Ghana proudly flies
In distant seas or else beneath our skies.
Let peace and fellow-feeling be our might,
And may our name be a radiant light.
 
4. This be our vow, O Ghana,
To live as one, in unity,
And in your strength, O Ghana,
To build a new fraternity!
Africa waits in the night of the clouded years
For the spreading light that now appears
To give us all a place beneath the sun:
The destined ending of a task well done. 
I sang the first verse of this in the morning as the national flag was raised at assembly at Ghana International School, Accra. Now I can believe that GIS "never got the memo" about the changes in 1960 and 1966, but I doubt they just made up these lyrics! Does anyone know the proper chronology for the various version of the lyrics. The music has remained the same. GrahamPadruig (talk) 21:51, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong original version?
Talk:Oliver Wyman (actor)

message: Can someone please add Pokémon back in his filmography section please. Some crazy users on here think it's unsourced but it's not, witch is stupid 2600:1000:B026:70A1:ED8B:FC8:8E74:D2D4 (talk) 21:24, 1 November 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually, this information is unsourced. Homechallenge55 (talk) 22:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

text: I have at least found definite proof that Oliver DID play as Drew before the recast controversy from the episode "Pros and Con Artists" from Advanced Challenge by sourcing the end credits. Even linked a picture in the edit summary so there's no room for denial at all. --Sk8erPrince (talk) 08:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Pokémon removed?

message: From the horse's mouth. Also backed up by ANN's profile. -- 136.181.195.25 (talk) 21:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sonic 

message: Wyman was in an interview in a YouTube video back in 2016, with YouTuber HannaTalk. In the video, he stated that actor Nick Wyman is his actual real life brother. I know Wikipedia’s policy says that YouTube can’t be used as a source, but it should be used because he mentioned his brother in this interview video. 73.61.22.234 (talk) 20:44, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: There is nothing in Wikipedia policy that prohibits YouTube as a source. YouTube videos are used all over Wikipedia. The standard is that sources have to be considered reliable. If a reliable source like The New York Times, Variety or The Lancet, to name of a couple of examples, have YouTube channels, then citing videos on those channels is no different than citing their print publications or their websites. Wikipedia does not discriminate sources on the basis of the medium or format. Can you cite the YouTube of some unknown, anonymous account? No, obviously not. But citing a video clip on the White House's official YouTube channel for something the President said is perfectly acceptable. Nightscream (talk) 23:16, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Nick Wyman
Talk:God Gave Rock and Roll to You

message: Are you all on drugs? About the only word in common is "god".  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.109.34.140 (talk) 22:12, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  "lyrics taken from Psalm 57 of the King James Bible" 

message: I propose that God Gave Rock 'N' Roll to You II be merged into God Gave Rock 'N' Roll to You. I think that the content in the Foo article can easily be explained in the context of God Gave Rock 'N' Roll to You, and the God Gave Rock 'N' Roll to You article is of a reasonable size that the merging of God Gave Rock 'N' Roll to You II will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. In the past covers of a song have always been merged. The above also shows a general consensus for the merger.184.13.141.64 (talk) --184.13.141.64 (talk) 19:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: It makes no sense. Both meet :WP:GNG and have different histories. Oppose. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:24, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

text: Yes, absolutely. 100% Merge. It's ridiculous not to. They are the same song. Merge, merge, merge! reinthal (talk) 17:51, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

text: I agree. Merge. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:12, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

text: Nonsense argument. They are the same song. These articles must be merged. 123.2.117.167 (talk) 12:50, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  If that's the case, then they get merged to God Gave Rock 'N' Roll to You not the other way around. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Yes, of course that's what I mean. Merge the KISS entry into the Argent entry, i.e. the article on the song's cover into the article on the original. I thought that was understood.  123.2.117.167 (talk) 15:58, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry. I missed that. This discussion is about merging the other content into here. Thanks for clarifying. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:35, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

text:  Now that I actually look at the templates and first discussion, I have seen that I have been reading it backward. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:37, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Then I believe we have enough support to merge the KISS article into the Argent article, yes? If so, let's do it. reinthal (talk) 20:50, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger proposal