lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Dance Hall at Louse Point

message: There is another page about this album: Strychnine_Ballroom:_Live_at_Louse_Point. They should be merged!!!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.225.122.199 (talk) 05:59, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Duplication problem

message: Is there anyway to add a John Parish chronology?  It seems unfair that he would get short-shifted in the infobox, since he does have other albums out.--Weebot 02:08, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox Question

message: Mick Harvey is credited as producer (in the 'Personnel' section), but he is omitted in the Infobox-
81.193.135.132 (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producers 
Talk:Diet of Finland

message: please check the book written by Osmo Jussila, Seppo Hentilä and Jukka Nevakivi (something like Finnish Political History 1809-2003 or like), where newer research results about the contemporary and juridical significance of Porvoo Diet.
It seems that the author of this article has been overly influenced by "personal union" delusion...
:One would rather say that the Finns have been so since, if not 1809, at least the 1820s. If that was a delusion or not is now of course an interesting question, but it was an important force behind the process that would ultimately lead to Finland's independence. /Tuomas 16:32, 1 Jul 2004 (UTC)

message: In 1809 did Alexander I call the Finnish estates to assembly in the States (a subnational assembly) or in an States-General?
Finnish historians see the Diet of Porvoo in 1809 as the birth of the Finnish state and nation. Russians historians (as well as tsarist bureaucrats during the russification period) may see it differently.
The crucial question is whether Alexander called the assembly of the States or the States-General. This is the difference between a nation and a subnational entity.
Modern Finnish texts are of little guide on this issue. The Diet of Porvoo is in Finnish called "Porvoon valtiopäivät". The word valtio refers to a true "Westphalian state". However the word valtio was unknown in 1809. Contemporarily the assembly was called maapäivät. Was maapäivät a States or a States-General?
::Petri Krohn 03:19, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: The States or States-General?

message: The Russian emperors are usually left as "tsars" in English. Should this article be change to conform to that convention, or is it "emperor" to reflect a Finnish distinction?--Dub8lad1 13:31, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Russian tsars were indeed tsars but the Grand Duchy of Finland was never a part Russia. (Except for Old Finland.) The Grand Duchy was part of the Russian Empire and the tsar ruled Finland as the emperor. Petri Krohn 09:12, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: "Emperor" or "Tsar"?

message: Should we merge this article to Cuisine of Finland? Transaction Go (talk) 03:26, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Diet of Finland merger?
Talk:Taking Tiger Mountain (By Strategy)

message: The text describing the Bauhaus cover version includes this statement: "…unlike Eno's version, it features a guitar solo, performed by Daniel Ash." I'm not sure if this is supposed to mean:
# Eno's version does not have a guitar solo, which it most certainly does, or
# Eno's version does not have a guitar solo by Daniel Ash, which probably goes without saying but isn't particularly relevant.
In either case I'm removing the assertion. -- Gyrofrog  (talk) 19:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Third Uncle

message: https://soundblab.com/reviews/albums/classic-albums/19108-brian-eno-taking-tiger-mountain-by-strategy
 “China My China” he deploys the sound of typewriter keys as a percussion instrument.
Jidanni (talk) 05:01, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note typewriter sound
Talk:Nail varnish impressions of stomata

message: Nail varnish impressions of stomata has been redirected to stoma following vfd discussion. I count 3 delete, 1 keep, and 1 redirect in the discussion (Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Nail varnish impressions of stomata) and since I don't see a consensus for any particular solution I've just gone ahead with the redirect. Content of this article can be recovered from the page history if need be. Wile E. Heresiarch 00:39, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Left Bank (disambiguation)

message: In her novel Wise Children, Angela Carter makes the distinction between the rive gauche and rive droite by comparing them to manhattan and brooklyn, or north and south london; their populations were of completely different economic states.  Is this still true?  Is there a class divide along these lines?  If not, when was it true?  Should this information be somehow provided in the article? - DropDeadGorgias (talk) 01:05, Jun 28, 2004 (UTC)
:If you have it, it should be included. Stevage 22:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Rive Gauche v. Rive Droite

message: I would like to split this article up into two completely separate ones - there is no real common thread between Biscay and Paris. Does anyone have objections to Left Bank referring uniquely to the Paris Left Bank, and Left Bank (Biscay) becoming the page for Biscay? Stevage 22:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Splitting up
Talk:Osman Nuri Pasha/Pre-merge 18 November 2006

message: This sub-page only exists to preserve the edit history of Osman Nuri Pasha prior to 18 November 2006, when it was merged to Osman Nuri Paşa.  On 12 July 2011, the article was renamed to Osman Nuri Pasha, necessitating this bit of trickery. The old talk page is at Talk:Osman Nuri Pasha/Archive 18 November 2006. Favonian (talk) 11:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Talk:Spanish miracle

message: Shouldn't this be a redirect to History of Spain and be treated in a wider context? And is "an excuse to demand mass popularity from a miserable civil population" something that can be expected from a merely virtual Dictatorship? I'm losing the conceptualization factor... Wetman 01:28, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: redirect?

message: This article is only the Spanish economic miracle 1959-1973, and none of the current events should be included. A guy incorporates current events out of place, if the vandalism continues we will have to block the page.
Gonbal  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.234.216.125 (talk) 15:52, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: This article is only the Spanish economic miracle

message: Both the article Greek Economic Miracle and this article claim that Greece and Spain respectively was "second only to Japan" in economic growth during the same period. Which is it then? --Nikoz78 (talk) 15:50, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Greek or Spanish? 

message: Every economic period has an ending, and reason for its ending. the end of the Spanish miracle should be discussed also.  It seems that as of 2013, Spain's economy is one of the worst-off in Europe, along with three other countries mentioned in the article: Portugal, Ireland, Greece.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.127.126.140 (talk) 13:32, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  end of economic miracle 

message: This article seems to have been written by a sympatizer with Franco's regime in the time. It doesn't include a single mention of the rural exodus and the poor living standard in Spain in the 60s and 70s highlighting the inequality promoted by the fascist/national catholic regime.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.65.72.121 (talk) 18:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Propaganda or facts?

message: The Greek and Spanish miracle Wikipedia articles, and other articles that state the miracles, both mention between the time of the 1950s-1970s as being the second fastest growing economy behind Japan. They both can not be second place? Should one be corrected? Different sources coming to different conclusions? Weigh one source over the other? Add a disclaimer, or note, over disputed sources? I don't know what to do
Greek Economic Miracle Article: "[time frame of 1950-73]...the Greek economy grew... second in the world only to Japan"
Economy of Greece Article: "[implied time frame post-WW2]...Greece saw growth rates second only to those of Japan, while ranking first in Europe in terms of GDP growth"
Spanish Economic Miracle Article: "[between 1959-1974 stated in the beginning of the article] second highest growth rate in the world, only slightly behind Japan"
Francisco Franco Article: "Spain became the second-fastest growing economy in the world between 1959 and 1973, just behind Japan"  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 21Helios12 (talk • contribs) 02:07, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contradictory Statements from Different Wikipedia Articles
Talk:Dubnobasswithmyheadman

message: The ID3 tags I've retrieved from FreeDB lists the CD version of this album as 1996 -- any idea why we use 1993 in the article?  Ojw 22:57, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: 1996 was probably a post-born slippy rerelease.  Night Gyr 08:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I definitely owned the album before 96 Talltim (talk) 22:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Valdas Adamkus

message: Which "European Olympic Games"? Is this the socalled Lithuanian's Olympic Games? --Jakro64 02:13, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: European Olympic Games

message: The information about the Olympic Games of the Enslaved Nations appears to 
come from Adamkus's official website:
http://www.president.lt/other/biography.en.phtml
However, a thorough googling reveals NO other reference to such an event except
in connection to Adamkus! 
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22olympic+games%22+%22enslaved+nations%22+-adamkus
The official Olympics website has no mention of any such event occuring in 1948. 
It seems a bit dubious to say the least...
: I vote to take out this Olympic reference. It is mentioned in a US EPA website:  about Adamkus, which refers to the "European Olympics in 1948", but no further information can be found. Several countries were not invited to the regular Olympic games that year (see 1948 Summer Olympics), including West Germany, where a number of Eastern European refugees were living at that time. Maybe someday this particular competition will receive some sort of published recognition, but until then, the article is better off without it.  Novickas 14:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Enslaved Nations 

message: Does anyone have access to the Lithuanian Encyclopedia? (mentioned in []) I know there is a copy at the University of Chicago, and our family used to have one. It might contain some info on these alternate Olympics (there have been quite a number of alternate Olympics over the years). Novickas 14:50, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re enslaved nations Olympics 

message: Am doing research on V.A.'s career in the EPA. Novickas 15:10, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re: EPA career 

message: I removed part of Alma Adamkiene "dual citizenship", because she, if I remember correctly, rejected US cit. several years ago. If somebody have other thoughts please share. M.K. 12:50, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Citizenship

message: In the article it states he was part of an underground anti-soviet movement. I didn't know that was another name for being a Nazi? He joined the Nazi SS, why is it not stated like that? There's pictures of him and documents as a Nazi.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.49.208.68 (talk) 03:24, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, but the sources (for example, , , ) do not say that. They say he "published an underground newspaper". So, I'll revert your changes (at least for a while). --Martynas Patasius (talk) 11:37, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWII alignment 

message: I would believe that the presented pictures could be more diverse. Why should there be 2 of the 3 pictures with U.S. officials?
86.3.42.126 (talk) 10:10, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: Why nothing is mentioned about Adamkus’ involvement into collaborationism and service in Fatherland Defense Force? EdwinStrum (talk) 17:04, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWII collaboration
Talk:The Book of Sand

message: I see this has been categorized under "1975 books". Is that appropriate for a short story? -- Jmabel 02:16, Jun 28, 2004 (UTC)
:this has been fixed. :: Kevinalewis : (Talk Page)/(Desk) 13:35, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: yyyy Books

message: I think this url (http://www.chronotext.org/bookOfSand/cover.htm) is active so I want to put it into external link. Why do you think it cannot be opened? Sendoh 10:36, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  An External Link 

message: because i have never read the book i find the plot summary to be highly confusing, i would try to edit it myself if i had read the story, but because i haven't i don't think i could do a good enough job.  Is the plot summary something i would be able to understand if i had read the book already?Killemall22 18:38, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In fact a large chunk of the plot summary isn't a summary of the plot at all but some kind of critique of the work. As Killema says, I've not read the book either and so would rather not re-write the summary myself, but it definitely needs dealing with.danno 15:14, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing 

message: Okay, I just read an online copy of the story, and I went through and replaced it with a much more clearer version that does away with the rambling commentary.Rex Imperator (talk) 02:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Rewrote the Summary

message: I don't see what this is referring to; the article seems sufficiently cited to me. Would anyone object to the tag being removed? —Μετάknowledgediscuss/deeds 22:50, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing the OR tag
Talk:Family tree of Spanish monarchs

message: I think it's time to update the Spain family tree (Spain united), to show the wedding of Prince Philip of Spain, the current heir to the throne, and Letizia Ortiz Rocasolano, the past 22nd of May in the "Catedral de la Almudena", in Madrid, Spain.  I've tried editing the image myself with The Gimp, but since I don't know which font was used or which size, the result isn't quite what I expected... I'll keep working on it, and when I have something "acceptable", if the family tree still remains "outdated", I'll upload the modified image.
I'm totally new in editing and/or completing Wikipedia articles, so please forgive my lack of experience...
:Your contributions are welcome, dear anonimous user. The font is Verdana, 10 pts. If you want to ask any question, post it in my my talk page. Cheers, Muriel G 07:50, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

message: The mother of King Juan Carlos is listed as being the daughter of Charles of Borboun-Sicilies and Maria Mercedes de las Mercedes Borbon y Asburgo-Lorena a daughter of King Alfonso XII. This is incorrect Maria Maria Mercedes de las Mercedes Borbon y Asburgo-Lorena died in 1904 ,the mother of King Juan Carlos was born in 1910 and Her name was Maria de las Mercedes de Borbon y Orleans and not Bourbon-Sicilies. What happened the Aragon Family tree? I don't know how, but can someone who does please fix it?
What has happened to the Aragon family tree?  -Danny David Jason Walker 01 January 2006
Maria de las Mercedes de Borbon y Orleans is the daughter of Louise, Charles's second wife.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.16.193.194 (talk) 20:22, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Error in family tree 

message: The tree is composed of both Kings and Queen(s). In order to have an appropriate title, i am moving the title to Monarchs of Spain family tree. -- FayssalF - Wiki me up ® 15:48, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: The following text was under the image. 
Louis of Bourbon, Dauphin of France, son of Louis XIV was born in 1661, not 1611
If it is correct then it should be incorporated into an updated version of the image. — MrDolomite • Talk 14:02, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Text under image 

message: You need to update this, Prince Phillip is now King Phillip VI. --190.164.61.105 (talk) 23:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: This complex family tree is missing legends to indicate marriages and descendants. I don't feel spending time deciphering the dotted lines between the boxes, and between descendants. — Ineuw talk 16:18, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Some niceties to be considered
Category talk:Units of frequency

message: I fail to see the point of all these articles on frequency units.
There's really only one unit of frequency (the Hertz).
.
We have articles for each SI prefix Category:SI_prefixes:
yotta
zetta
exa
peta
tera
giga
mega
kilo
milli
micro
etc..
We have articles on many SI units:
Hertz
Ampere
Newton
Coulomb
Joule
Watt
Farad
Henry (inductance)
Volt
Tesla
Ohm
etc..
Do we really need an article on each and every combination of each metric prefix with each SI unit?
If you really want milliVolts to link to something, why can't we say
milliVolts
?
-- DavidCary 03:23, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
replies: text: I have been creating Categories to collect together existing articles on related subjects. I do not intend to create any further articles within the categories - others may - but feel that where multiple related articles exist then it should be easy to move between them. Some use the Kilogram << Tonne or Megagram << Gigagram construct to show the relationship. Surely each frequency article refers to a different part of, eg, the spectrum - and can be tailored with the particular use of this part, e.g. microwaves, radio waves etc. i.e. the various articles probably had an original reason for their separate existence. The use of these categories shows up better on categories where we have both SI and Imperial / US customary units. Personally I find the agglutinated links confusing. If the word looks linked (underlined), I expect to find a related article subsequently. If I accidentally clicked on the milli half of the link, I might not find anything to do with electrical potential. ian cairns 06:23, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Talk:Ye Olde Space Bande

message: I will attempt to correct the article, but I'm not experienced enough to move the article from "Ye Olde Space Bande" to its proper place.  I will look into how to do that, but for now I will just make the appropriate changes to the article itself. MaxVolume (talk) 18:07, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect title... please move!
Talk:Santana (1969 album)

message: The article says it failed to create much interest when it was released as a single, but my version is included in a Daily Mail-album "20 Number Ones" implying it topped the chart...--85.210.159.223 (talk) 14:52, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jin-Go-Lo-Ba 

message: I would guess that many people these days are not even aware that Carlos Santana sang on this song.  Is this notable in and of itself?  Also, how many other songs, if any others, did Carlos sing on?  I'm personally not aware of any others.RadioKAOS (talk) 06:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Shades of Time 

message: Mention needs to be made of the album cover which features a number of hidden faces.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.39.70.23 (talk) 18:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Album Cover
Talk:Freak the Mighty

message: The plot summary was rambling and all-but incoherent.  I've replaced it with a much briefer but more informative one (quite well written, too) from an older revision . --Tony 01:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plot summary

message: I've made some corrections in the Plot Summary. I didn't correct the whole thing but feel free to do so. 74.109.63.240 (talk) 02:38, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Some Corretions

message: max punches freak71.30.164.185 (talk) 23:08, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  cool maqx
Talk:War All the Time (Thursday album)

message: I HIGHLY doubt that the video for "War All The Time" was too controversial for MTV.  Reiver 18:26, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Too Controversial?!?!

message: The entire section, "Song Meanings" is completely unsourced material. Aside from that stand-alone fact, it's poorly written, poorly edited, and the themes are poorly coveyed. No one cares, including me, what some depressed teenager thinks about "the oblivion of the American workforce." Unless someone can quote the band, the entire section needs to go. --Haizum 01:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That means nothing. --Haizum    μολὼν λαβέ 19:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notice: Noncompliant Section 
Talk:The Fourth World (album)

message: Just cleaned up a lot of the article and added a couple of sources.  I also commented out the clean up and sources tags because I feel they are not needed any longer (as much).  If anyone feels differently, they're still there.  Hope my edits helped!Jeremy Swinarton 06:38, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Clean up and Sources 

message: Me and a friend have been discovering everything about Kara's Flowers that we can find, and in all our efforts, we found out some major bits. Go to (http://everythingkarasflowers.blogspot.com/2012/12/karas-flowers-discography-complete.html) and you'll see we are not wrong. So you can't change the other albums/demos section because you think "it's wrong." Because it is not. If you say otherwise, contact me. Otherwise, don't change it unless you're cleaning it up. CerealKiller528 (talk) 04:51, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Blogspot is not a reliable source, so I'm moving the other albums to a subarticle. They shouldn't even be in this article anyway. Hooky-i-vanisher (talk) 04:21, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Whole Kara's Flowers Discography
Talk:Pornography (album)

message: Anyone else think the "Track Listing" section should be placed earlier the article? "Legacy," for example, is typically near the end.  I think the track listing should be immediately after the "Background" section.  Thoughts?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.51.205.186 (talk) 23:11, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The Wikipedia style guidelines for records recommend that tracklists and other non-prose-heavy sections go towards the end of an article. 120.150.60.104 (talk) 07:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Track Listing 

message: I propose the lead be changed from "English rock band The Cure" to simply "English band The Cure"; or, at least, "English rock band The Cure" – is it necessary to wikilink what is, to most Wikipedia readers, a very well-known genre of music, as well known likely as England or the concept of a musical band? It is more general, and The Cure's music has expanded outside of rock into pop and resists fitting into this easy category. Any supporters? 120.150.60.104 (talk) 07:53, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: First, it's lower-case the in "the Cure" in running prose, per WP:THECAPS. Second, can you show that your suggestion is how the band is described in reliable sources? A couple of links to articles would be helpful. Binksternet (talk) 21:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genre in lead section