lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:King of the Mountains

message: "KOM climb"??
During a bike race on TV, the announcers kept using the term "KOM climb". I haven't been able to find a definition of this term although it appears on several websites. Can someone define this? 
68.110.238.175 (talk) 03:43, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: KOM = "King of the Mountains" ie, the climbs carry points which count towards the race's overall climbers classification. Paul W (talk) 08:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

message: Which races, if any, actually use the King of the Mountain title, of anything that directly translates thus?  None of the three Grand tours use it in their native language.  Should this article not be at Mountains classification (cycle races) or something similar?  Kevin McE (talk) 10:53, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Would Wikipedia:Official names not apply here? Mountains classification returns under 500 000 google hits, compared to 17.9 million for king of the mountains. A current news search shows Matthew Lloyd described as winner of the 'king of the mountains' classification at the Giro in the vast majority of news sources - though I'd agree that this isn't universal (the telegraph uses 'mountains classification', for example). Mountains classification does redirect here as it is. --Pretty Green (talk) 12:17, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Who actually uses the phrase?
Talk:Tour de Georgia

message: The article starts out: "Tour de Georgia is ranked as a Hors Classe (2.HC) event by the UCI [...] making it North America's highest rated professional cycling stage race." This is misleading because the Tour of California is also ranked 2.HC and is arguably more popular, attracting more renown cyclists. scotts 17:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

message: I've updated this a little, but the only source I can find that even mentions the race post-2010 is www.examiner.com/cycling-in-atlanta/dan-schoolfield, which is blocked by the spam blacklist. Are there any better sources out there? Interplanet Janet (talk) 16:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: This news item, which is cited in the article, says the tour was cancelled for 2010.  The event doesn't appear in cyclingnews' calendar for 2011 or 2012. I think it's fair to assume that the event hasn't been held since 2008 and is essentially defunct. --Wikitoov (talk) 02:29, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Defunct?
Talk:Bhurban

message: Just out of curiosity, what is the point of including the trivia section about Javed Miandad in this page about Bhurban? 203.30.93.16 (talk) 00:44, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Trivia Section 
Talk:Changla Gali

message: changla gali is a veary beatefull place of galyat  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.59.161.4 (talk) 17:32, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Max Hamilton

message: Great start. As per wikipedia guidelines I think the title of this article should be Max Hamilton, rather than Professor Max Hamilton. 
From wikipedia: "King", "Queen", "Blessed", "Mother", "Father", "Doctor", "Mister", or any other type of qualifier is generally avoided as first word for a page name of a page on a single person, unless for disambiguation or redirect purposes (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_%28people%29#Qualifiers_not_between_brackets)
194.83.139.58 18:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Title of this article 

message: The new infobox says he was "Born Max Hamilton." As the main article says he was born in Germany, to a family named Himmelschein, I wonder whether that could be completely accurate? NRPanikker (talk) 14:56, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Birth Name
Talk:Red Mill (snack food manufacturer)

message: Move proposed to new name "Red Mill" to reflect correct capitalization of proper name. This name, "Red mill" should become a redirect. Askari Mark (Talk) 18:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 
Talk:Matthew Stephens (cyclist)

message: First edit on Wiki - go easy on me :) Added a line or two regarding his Sigma Sports Youtube series. Looking at it, the flow of the paragraph does not seem right - made worse by this edit - but will review and edit later once I get the hang of editing on here. Unless anyone with more experience can fix it?  PythagorasDyscalculia (talk) 10:05, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  First edit
Talk:Kuurne–Brussels–Kuurne

message: The article states the classification of the race is 1. HC, linking to the article about UCI race classifications. However, this article doesn't know about a 1. HC classification. Instead, this article states the race is has the 1. Pro classification.
Which article is correct? Abigail-IV (talk) 16:19, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Classification
Talk:L'Étape du Tour

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below, but I have created a redirect from the proposed title to this article.  Dekimasuよ! 07:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: L'Étape du Tour →  – The organizer changed the official naming a while ago, see https://www.letapedutourdefrance.com. 80.129.175.222 (talk) 19:40, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 21 July 2022 

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: not moved. No conclusive proof yet that the target title is the common name in the English publications. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: L'Étape du Tour →  – As per the move request dated 21 July 2022, the organizer changed the official naming a while ago. Additionally, the official naming has since been adopted in the majority of articles on the subject. There are 388.000 google hits for the new name 'L'Étape du Tour de France', whereas there are 567.000 google hits for 'L'Étape du Tour' which *include* the 388.000 google hits for the longer name - thus giving a total of 179.000 google hits for the old name alone. Notwithstanding the many errors in this calculation (which would only distort results in favor of the shorter name), this goes to show, that the new naming has indeed been adopted widely. Browsing through the google search results of https://www.google.com/search?q=%22L%27%C3%88tape+du+Tour+de+France%22 provides plenty of further evidence. 87.153.128.144 (talk) 22:12, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject Cycling has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 22:02, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

text: Note: WikiProject France has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 22:03, 10 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 3 September 2022
Talk:La Vie Claire

message: Is the Urban Outfitters t-shirt really anything to do with La Vie Claire? Or are they both just referencing Mondrian? --Specialbr3w (talk) 16:04, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

message: I would like to see a citation for the French and Belgians being in support of Hinault.  Not saying it is wrong, but a source is necessary.
Greg Lemond hints as much on page 11 of Greg LeMond's Complete Book of Bicycling, but he does not mention British riders.
He says that his supporters included Andy Hampsten (American), Steve Bauer (Canadian), Niki Ruttiman, and Guido Winterberg (the last two were both Swiss riders). 47.137.190.123 (talk) 05:15, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Intra-team rivalry in 1986 Tour de France 
Talk:Lanterne rouge

message: Does anyone know how to change the wikicode so that "Flag of France" actually appears as a French flag, not a link? Tiger Khan 14:11, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: There has been a problem with the server load over the past few days meaning images aren't always rendered. It's a temporary thing though and will right itself. SeveroTC 16:56, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Megavalanche

message: Page is out of date, I think the Fitness section is unnecessary or should be merged into the above paragraphs, and the 2007 results should be eliminated, perhaps to show top overall winners for each of the years the event has been held. Peter (talk) 22:43, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed removal of Fitness and 2007 Results section 

message: I suggest that this page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mega_Avalanche
is merged into http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megavalanche.
Rationale:
 - 'Megavalanche' is the correct name of the event
 - The pages cover the same topic  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.86.114.207 (talk) 11:57, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed merge of Mega Avalanche and Megavalanche pages 

message: I have just moved the page back from Megavalanche Alpe D'Huez to Megavalanche, as it was before 24 June. This is a more common name (WP:COMMONNAME), and does not need anything extra attached. The location is well explained in the lead section. Feel free to discuss this here. Tboa talk. 17:11, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Page move
Template talk:Footnote label

message: This redirect exists for usage of  for informational footnotes instead of reference footnotes. It is used with . It is separate because it may well be replaced with alternative code, and in the interim, it will not be snared by bot tools that do  to <ref> conversions.  — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 18:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose
Talk:Theodor Leupold

message: Do you have any sources that support this Olympian being notable? BilledMammal (talk) 00:08, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: He meets the criteria of WP:CYCLING by virtue of having been an Olympian. —МандичкаYO 😜 00:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
replies: text:  That guideline changed last year; it no longer presumes notable, and it now requires that before we can even consider keeping an article it must have at least one source containing WP:SIGCOV. BilledMammal (talk) 00:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability
Talk:Parkland Walk

message: ...used Parkland Walk as the setting for one of her scariest London murder mysteries—I don't recall the title but it stayed with me. Read it several years before moving to London and was taken aback to realize Stroud Green was (a) a real place and (b) right next to where I was living.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.74.242 (talk) 03:41, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ruth Rendell used Parkland Walk as the setting for one of her scariest London murder mysteries—I don't recall the title but it stayed with me. Read it several years before moving to London and was taken aback to realize it was about a half-mile away fro 

message: The route description in the article omits an entire section of the Parkland Walk south of Finsbury Park, which I walked a number of times when I was working in the area between 2010 and 2020. This is pedestrian-only and starts at the western end of Gillespie Road, close to Arsenal station and a short distance north of the Emirates Stadium, and then runs close to the eastern side of the railway lines out of Kings Cross towards Finsbury Park station until it descends down a steep flight of steps to Seven Sisters Road immediately south of Finsbury Park station. This then connects to the rest of the Parkland Walk as described in the article by crossing Seven Sisters Road, walking past the eestern entrances to Finsbury Park station, then into Finsbury Park and close to its western edge until one reaches the railway footbridge at which the article currently says that the Parkland Walk starts. The 4.5 mile length for the Parkland Walk which the article describes as "mistaken" is in fact correct when this section is included.
I am noting this here for now rather than in the article, until I can find official descriptions of the route that can be regarded as a reliable source (at least for verification purposes). PWilkinson (talk) 19:21, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The pedestrian route you describe, which I know quite well, is the path through Gillespie Park. It is not part of the Parkland Walk. Dubmill (talk) 19:38, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The route description is incomplete 

message: As far as I can tell the only reference to the fact that a road might have been planned on the line of the walk and that it was successfully stopped by the Friends of the Parkland Walk is the Friends of the Parkland Walk website itself. Is there any other reference that covers this? 77.103.186.79 (talk) 20:10, 28 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Road plans of the 80s
Talk:Greenway footpath, London

message: "Stratford, Plaistow and Newham" doesn't make sense. Stratford is in (LB) Newham and so is Plaistow.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.63.230 (talk) 22:29, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place Names 

message: Map needed:  compare High Line (New York City). Wikiain (talk) 02:46, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Map 

message: I moved the article from "Greenway, London" to "Greenway footpath, London" because the former seems misleading by indicating there is a Greenway, London - some sort of subsection or officially named neighborhood and so on. Someone not from London or even England would not be familiar with this English naming scheme. Also, this title accurately reflects the actual topic and text of this article. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 22:13, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Name change

message: Do we really need that many pictures? A link to the relevant Commons category would be more appropriate. Crookesmoor (talk) 14:34, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gallery 

message: Love this cycle route some fantastic views of the surrounding area. 81.105.146.31 (talk) 20:39, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  New user
Talk:Belmont railway line, New South Wales

message: I renamed this page from Fernleigh Track to Belmont railway line, but in retrospect I probably should have discussed it first. If anyone strongly objects, especially the persons who created it, then feel free to change it back.
The Fulch 01:58, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renaming 
Talk:Leitra

message: BEWARE: THE TRIKE ON THE PICTURE IS NOT A LEITRA! See the homepage for pictures. (i'm not allowed to upload picture :-( )
--109.76.66.184 (talk) 20:25, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  `Removed this from article page 
Talk:Team pursuit

message: Recommend the article clarify if the women's event also relies on the position of the third rider to determine the winning team.  If so, the sentence that includes the phrase "it is common for one rider to take a death pull" probably only applies to the men's event, and should so state. I do not have a reference to clarify this myself. Atticusfinch80 (talk) 05:03, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Differences between men's and women's event
Talk:Liège–Bastogne–Liège

message: The term "Doyenne" is utterly untranslatable into English, but I changed it from "The Oldest" to "The Old Lady", because I felt something went lost in translation. Language fora are not helpful either. The literal translation of doyenne is "female dean" – in the particular meaning of "member of the catholic clergy" but used here in its metaphorical meaning as "most senior member". Since it is a distinctly female word, I felt "The Old Lady" is somewhat more metaphorically appropriate, but I welcome other suggestions. Dr.robin (talk) 17:50, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Translation of Doyenne
Talk:Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly

message: The topic of the Comprehensive Care Management article the not sufficiently notable on its own, and there is large amount of duplicate/shared material between it & the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly article. Likewise the advertisement issues with Comprehensive Care Management could be taken care of by the careful selection of what material to bring over as part of the merge. -- 12.106.111.10 18:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Much of the article is derived directly from other source text. There are minimal citations, especially those from independent, peer-reviewed sources. The History section is dense and hard to follow. The article lacks a neutral tone.
Plan to add Eligibility, Financing section, and Program Outcomes section.
Remove extraneous history information and condense it into a bullet-pointed list. Reduce sensationalism.
Rephrase text to be in our own words. Rename “How it works” to “Description.” Angelicality7 (talk) 17:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Workplan
Talk:List of cyclists

message: Should this article be proposed for deletion? Lacks a lot of riders and can become really big.-Drunt 17:16, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe it just needs some focus... List of cyclists who have done something, otherwise people just add their own favourites. Indiscriminate lists aren't good. SeveroTC 22:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: It needs some context, and I am not sure what the decade header is meant to be. Is it the the decade that they were born in? Is it the decade they won their first major award? Lance Armstrong spans three decades in his career. The list needs years of birth and death and sentence or two saying what their contribution is. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 17:40, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cmt
Talk:List of wins by home–Jack & Jones and its successors

message: Should Team CSC's overall win in the team competition portion of the Amgen Tour of California be added to the win list? Didn't want to add it without clarification?  Dgrundler 00:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Team Results 
Talk:Shams

message: What is the point of having two disambiguations pages, Shams and Shams (disambiguation)?  I merged them together but this was reverted.  Please explain?  —taestell 18:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: As far as I can tell, you changed Shams from being a reidrect to "Shams (disambiguation)" on October 12th 2006: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shams&diff=80942696&oldid=44973997 , which is pretty much where the duplication began... AnonMoos 11:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I took added content from Shams, moved it here, and restored redirect... AnonMoos 11:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If there is no main article at Sham, the disambiguation page should be located there.  There is no need to create an additional page with "(disambiguation)" in the title.  This page should be moved back there.  —taestell 17:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge question

message: Although this is somewhat off of what disambiguation pages do, it seems to be showing prominent uses of the word, not just pages with the same name. in this spirit, ive added some content, and divided it into arabic and english uses. If someone feels it should ONLY be pages called "shams", I will understand, but this does seem useful to me (and there are quite a few pages like this on WP, so consensus seems to allow for this type of disambig)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:43, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Purpose
Talk:List of RAGBRAI overnight stops

message: It would be good if somebody could add data on the hilliness of the routes.CountMacula (talk) 08:46, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Data on elevation/hills. 

message: Feel free to use / modify my python script I wrote to convert the route data into the rest of the data on the page (by visit frequency & by city).
:https://github.com/cmlburnett/WP-RAGBRAI
It's pretty straight forward python.
Cburnett (talk) 22:12, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Processing script 

message: There are images of the route map for each year.  Could someone add them to this page?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.49.71.155 (talk) 20:36, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Route maps
Talk:Litespeed

message: Okay, so now it appears that all the new text is lifted directly from www.litespeed.com
For example
* "Considered an exotic material at that time, titanium was not thought to be a material from which one could build bike frames."
*" Litespeed changed the world's expectations towards titanium with the creation of the first modern titanium frames."
*"With the end of the Cold War and the sudden availability of alloys no longer restricted to use in nuclear and aviation industries, interest in titanium as a viable bike-building material grew."
etc.
I believe I have no option but to revert all of it. -AndrewDressel (talk) 02:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: See OTRS permission template added above.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 17:01, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Awesome, now all we need is to edit so that it doesn't read like marketing copy and find reliable independent sources for the interesting claims. -AndrewDressel (talk) 19:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright violations
Talk:Mohican MTB 100

message: "Rumor has it..." "Obviously their efforts are not working..."
Markowe (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Editorialising
Talk:Molteni (cycling team)

message: The company that sponsored this bicycle team was "Alimentari Molteni" (Molteni foods), a famous sausage producer not the stove maker. See for example: http://www.salmilano.it/uk/oltre/oltre.htm
194.24.158.1 (talk) 19:27, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Molteni Company

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Move the first one. (non-admin closure) History6042 (talk) 20:36, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 4 September 2023
Talk:Mongoose (company)

message: Are the model years supposed to say 2007, 2008, 2009, then 2001?  I'm pretty sure that last one should say 2010, but I didn't want to make the edit without being sure.  Can someone could confirm this and update the page with the proper year, or move that section before 2007 if it is indeed supposed to be 2001 so the years are in chronological order?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.62.243.227 (talk) 12:09, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

message: Is it a company or a brand name? Maybe the name of the article should be changed? HighAley (talk) 14:22, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: I see the company seems to be called BMX Products - at least back in 1982. So the Mongoose is then the product, not the company. Bruxton (talk) 17:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Comany or brand name

message: *Old School BMX magazines - many read like adverts but perhaps some facts can be gleaned. Bruxton (talk) 17:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Treasure trove
Talk:Jenaro Sánchez Delgadillo

message: I added the attention tag to this article because it contains NO TEXT.  Please add content as soon as possible, and remove then attention tag when complete.  Thanks, Pastordavid 18:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Attention Tag 