lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of Hindu deities

message: Is he really a deity? Does he really belong in the same class as the likes of Indra and Vishnu who have been worshipped for thousands of years and praised in sacred texts? Of course some hindus will just worship anyone- including people who never claimed to be gods and who would have been horrified to learn that people were worshipping idols of them (eg. Sri Narayana Guru) --Grammatical error 19:22, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree – you have a point. Note that the article about Hindu deities defines "deities" to include "avatars of the supreme being" and the article about Swaminarayan says he was "venerated as an Avatar of Narayana" in the Swaminarayan Faith. [sd] 05:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Swaminarayan

message: Each God should have a rudimentary description beside it describing their domain.
I.E.
*Zeus Chief God, Thunder, Sky
*Odin Chief God, Wisdom, War
*Thor Thunder, Jock stock Characters
*Kali Death, Destruction, Time, Change
Klichka (talk) 17:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree. Even detailed descriptions (with references) would greatly benefit the list. [sd] 05:35, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs descriptions 

message: I have never heard of this one before, and lacking a wikipedia page (or in fact any relevant search results on the internet), can we delete this one? Atresta (talk) 19:02, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ahswhrat 

message: This page is about the list of Hindu deities but there is hardly any proper  list here. Instead, the page is having the same copy paste content from different major deities wikipages. This page should just have general introduction about Hinduism and then there should be a PROPER list encompassing different form of Hindu deities both pan world and regional forms. What is the need of writing multiple names of Vishnu, Shiva, Brahma here. Isn't it better to just mention their different forms in the list format? Also, does the introduction written here for major god and goddesses really required here? We can just add the one liners and wikilinks related to respective forms of god. This page is about the list of Hindu deities, don't make it a look like a detailed regular wikipage. All those concerned, feel free to join the discussion and share your views. Thanks. Kridha (talk) 13:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Kridha I notice that around 2005, this article was originally an alphabetised list of all Hindu deities, followed by their aspects in various sections. I feel that the article could be restored to this version, and if possible, minus the different sections with the aspects, since the aspects will inevitably be a point of contention and debate among various groups. Even the one-liners that accompany descriptions of the alphabetised deities could be vandalised. I agree with the deletion of the introduction. I'm in favour of a simplified, alphabetised list of deities, with their respective links, with deities without citations or Wikipedia links subject to the editors' scrutiny. Chronikhiles (talk) 06:16, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layout and content of the page
Talk:Fedor Tyutin

message: This article is lacking in information on Tyutin's RSL and OHL career. IrisKawling 22:41, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  RSL/OHL 
Talk:Kabul Shahi

message: Intothefire (talk) 12:16, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: What is with all of the references used for this article dating from texts of the 1800's? Many of the articles cited as "fact" actually predate the disciplines of anthropology and archaeology that emerged in the latter 1800's... Shouldn't there be relatively contemporary references, say from the last 50 years or so - preferably even more recent? It would undoubtedly make for a more authentic and useful article... Stevenmitchell (talk) 11:01, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old References Used 

message: The entire section 'Alberuni and the myth of Turkic origins' is poorly written, full of weasel words and reads like an opinion piece, and not something encyclopedic. As such, it requires an immediate clean-up and rewrite. 92.9.100.93 (talk) 17:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alberuni and the myth of Turkic origins - Not encyclopedic 

message: The whole article (aside from the first paragraph) is written from the point of view of someone who already is familiar with the history of Kabul Shahi, who knows about the scholars who have researched it, and has opinions on them. I don't know of Hsuen Tsang, nor is there any link to an explanation of him, or what he thinks or thought; in the second part it assumes "to be connected to the Kamboja 'race'" to be a meaningful concept to the reader, and this frame of reference continues. I think that this is a scholarly discussion of whether or not the kingdom in question has Turkic, Indian, or other ancestry, but it's utterly baffling to a novice and really better kept to papers in a class on such topics.
I want to know what we *do* know about these people, and if that information is reliable. I do not care about justifying one or another point of view - it would be sufficient to say 'this scholar believes that they are of Turkish origin, but these scholars say this is unreliable. Evidence in these works suggests they were more likely of Buddhist or Hindu extraction." Put that in a little section called "scholarly debate" and we're in business. 03:12, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Written like a term paper
Talk:Sena dynasty

message: The paragraph is abound with inaccuracies — 
*
:*A book on sociology/politics (Indian Nationalism) can seldom be a good-enough source for early medieval history.
:*The second source was edited by a poet/lit. critic. It does not state anything about Samantasena describing himself.
*
:*The source does not mention anything similar to what is claimed.
*
:*Inden did not find them as Vaidyas, at-least at the page cited. He merely quotes a kulanji. (I have a gut-feeling that Inden, usual of his idiosyncratic scholarship, had bought the theory; will read the book.)
:*I have never heard about the second book: it is neither held in any reputed library nor cited by anyone nor reviewed in any journal. Looks like a local textbook.
* 
:* This is mostly wrong. B+K.
*
:*So? As I wrote at Baidya,  Fwiw many other castes claim Sens to be one of their own.
*
:*How is he an expert in history? People have all kind of weird views and justifications.
TrangaBellam (talk) 20:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Added basic facts at Sena dynasty#Origins. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:54, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  On origins 

message: @ekdalian I think we should move the amalgamated part from origin,just like you did on pala Empire Miller110 (talk) 08:04, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, we can do that as per consensus on the other similar article. Thanks for your suggestion! Let us give some time to other editors as well. Ekdalian (talk) 08:10, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: No, you got me wrong! We can't merge the statements; WP:SYN is not allowed here. We can have the same (as it is) in a separate section on decline, that's what I meant. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 08:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: got you.I am moving it to the decline part.is it ok?Miller110 (talk) 08:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Hello Miller110, as mentioned in my edit summary, let's wait for consensus for a separate section on 'Decline'. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 14:16, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  origins and amalgamated 

message: To attribute a modern caste to Senas as a matter-of-fact is ridiculously anachronistic. Two sections above, I wrote 
Sarkar et al do not deem the Senas to be Baidyas: they are translating a pamphlet from 1963 titled "Hindu Mahilaganer Hinabastha" by one Kailashbasini Devi (p. 504). As I noted in the edit-summary, this is a misrepresentation of source. TrangaBellam (talk) 20:34, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  thanks for the clarification. now I can understand.you are really good in your work Miller110 (talk) 20:47, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caste of Senas
Talk:Canyon Country, Santa Clarita, California

message: why is there a picture of a cat in this page?!?!?!
<img src= "http://i12.tinypic.com/4mhh343.png">
Beware of Mountains Lions  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.87.130.172 (talk) 21:36, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  HA????
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation/Malplaced disambiguation pages

message: #  redirects to LAN (disambiguation) (of course, this also hinges on a reading of WP:DABNAME)
*I'd say this is correct.  Lan is ambiguous – Lan (film), Lan (tribe), etc. – and there are also all-caps meanings such as LAN Airlines.  Lan isn't an English word, so we capitalise the title.  LAN is a primary redirect, so LAN (disambiguation) is the right title, and  correctly redirects there. Certes (talk) 11:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lan/LAN 

message: I had removed the discussion because the two pages Formosa and Formosa (disambiguation) are no longer malplaced, so the discussion is resolved as far as this project is concerned. There may still be are undoubtedly discussions about various Taiwan pages still going on, but for the narrow scope of this page, this one is done. — Gorthian (talk) 21:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Formosa discussion
Talk:Phanom Rung Historical Park

message: There have been edits by multiple IP users attempting to deny the temple's historical Khmer influence, and unfortunately some established editors have been mistakenly restoring the bad edits and reverting those trying to fix the introduced errors instead. Discospinster, Grumpylawnchair and NmWTfs85lXusaybq, please be more careful. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for your reminder of IP vandals. Edits by  were found by incorrectly formatted wikilinks and categories while reverted for external link spamming. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 23:07, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nationalistic disruptive edits
Talk:Chota Char Dham

message: If someone wants to sort this out...
#Nanijdhaam, this dhaam is situated at small village nanij, tal- ratnagiri (maharashtra) which is entitled by newly Jagatguru Ramanadacharya Shri Swami Narendracharyaji Maharaj at Jagatguru Ramnandacharya peeth - Nanijdhaam (Ratnagiri, Maharashtra) 
--202.70.64.41 (talk) 10:25, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Note:  Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article  falls under :Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article  --  TinuCherian     (Wanna Talk?)   - 13:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition 

message: Is this Ramanathaswamy_Temple,_Rameswaram the same place as the pic of Rameswaram ? rkmlai (talk) 21:54, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 
Talk:Thaipusam

message: This article is extraoridnarily confusing. I cannot even figure it out. But I don't know how to flag articles for clarification. alvastarr 21:53, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Wiki Raja 10:44, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Dravidian civilizations

message: On item:-
* Interestingly, Thaipusam is also increasingly being celebrated by the ethnic Chinese in Malaysia citation needed.
The increase in ethnic Chinese have been noted in various forum, but not in any official WEB that I know off. Does forum qualified for fact/reference. Refer to this http://www.google.com.my/search?hl=en&q=thaipusam+ethnic+Chinese+have+joined+kavadi&btnG=Google+Search&meta=
Yosri (talk) 13:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Increase in ethnic Chinese  

message: is it true that the vel kavadi practice is banned in India itself?  --86.135.123.138 (talk) 01:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  banned in India 

message: The article needs, among other corrections, consistent spelling. For example, is Thaipusam one word or two? (Thai Pusam) It is spelled both ways throughout. Scottdoc (talk) 04:52, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  One word or two? 

message: "It is a national holiday in many countries like Malaysia, Sri Lanka, Mauritius and Fiji. I...
Note: In Fiji, Thaipusam is not officially declared as a national holiday"
For the sake of a casual reader like me it would be useful to explain in what sense it is a national holiday if not officially declared, or to leave Fiji out. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 23:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  national holiday in Fiji or not?
Talk:Anāgāmi

message: I'm translating to italian and will add sources there. After that I will "backport" the changes, thankfully the article is still small enough.--Esteban Barahona (talk) 06:32, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  translation to italian - anagami/αναγκάμι 

message: This part of the four steps to enlightenment needs more information as well. tumaru 13:12, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs more info 

message: Doesn’t seem relevant…or lacking an explanation 72.95.130.125 (talk) 23:21, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Picture
Talk:Wabamun Lake

message: For awhile now their have been sightings of a cougar in the Wabamun Lake Area.  I live near there and for past few months I have been hearing what I think are wolves howling. Though I havn't actually seen any and havn't heard of anyone who has, though their is supposedly a pack that lives near Entwhistle. kc4 - the Server Monkey Enforcer 07:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rumoured wildlife 

message: My concern with the added content regarding unauthorized development is not lack of truth or references, though the third paragraph is unreferenced and appears to be original research. The overarching concern is WP:NOTNEWS, which states “Wikipedia considers the enduring notability of persons and events. While news coverage can be useful source material for encyclopedic topics, most newsworthy events do not qualify for inclusion.” This event is not enduring and will not stand the test of time. It is nowhere near the scale of the oil spill event, which deserves significant coverage in the article. Some of the content also appears to be soapboxing the fact that little to no remediation has taken place to date.I’ll be removing the third paragraph to address the concern it being unreferenced, appearing to be original research and appearing to be soapboxing frustration over the lack of progress on remediation. I’ll also be removing the category, which does not exist and isn’t warranted, and smoothing out some language while also posting a note on WP:ALBERTA to see if my concern about this event lacking enduring notability are shared. If no, I’ll bugger off. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 07:45, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: While awaiting comment from others on the NOTNEWS concern, I just scaled the section back through a series of 11 edits. In addition to removing what I said I would above, I removed: non-neutral POV; content not actually supported by the references provided including fear-mongering content; information that is too granular; and copyright violations. Hwy43 (talk) 08:39, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unauthorized development
Talk:Flex circuit

message: This article should not be a redirect to Flexible electronics.  Flex circuits and flexible electronics are different topics.  Although flexible electronics may make use of flex circuits, "flex circuits" are a technology which typically uses conventional rigid components with a flexible interconnection system. A flex circuit is a flexible version of a printed circuit board, using similar design tools and having many fabrication steps in common. --QuicksilverT @ 07:18, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wrong redirect
Talk:Santhara

message: This article is in dire need of a cleanup and attention from an expert. There ought to be sections on Jainism and Hinduism, as well as a much clearer introduction to Sallekhana in general. This is a potentially controversial topic & would greatly benefit from a neutral, clear article. Fdedio 09:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs cleanup. 

message: Where are the reliable sources that use the term dharmic religions in the context of this article? Dharmic religions is a now deleted obscure neologism and should not be used throughout Wikipedia. a good alternative is Indian religions. Andries 15:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Reliable sources for the term [[dharmic religions]]?
Talk:Hinduism in South America

message: About 84% of the East Indian immigrants 
Does this refer to people from the Eastern part of India, or from the East Indies? --Singkong2005 14:10, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The term is a general term for people with origins in the Indian subcontinent, to distinguish from West Indians and indigenous people.  Guettarda 18:26, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: East Indian?
Talk:KUTP

message: I have moved this article back to KUTP from KUTP-TV. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here:  the call letters for this station are in fact KUTP. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. A 07:31, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: I used the Wayback Machine to collect two versions of a UPN45 logo: one from 1999 and the other 2001. Do I place a TV tag on the old logos? -Tracker 23:01, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Unless I am mistaken, you can.  --WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:27, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old 45 logos 

message: The station's identilty rebranded as Fox 10 Xtra today. Does anyone have the new logo for the station? J4lambert (talk) 17:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: New logo for KUTP necessary
Talk:WTTO

message: WDBB used to be known for a program with this name.  It was hosted by Misty Brew who was a very accomplished Elvira impersonator and would add similar commentary to the films.  This was around 1985-1987.
I would love to find the original owners of this station and thank them for the service they provided to the area.  They produced some wonderful local programs.  I really miss that kind of ingenuity in broadcasting.
Tim Legg kc0ofc at yahoo.67.104.200.131 (talk) 03:34, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  17 Shock Theatre

message: I have moved this article back to WTTO from WTTO-TV. Consensus on both WP:NC#Broadcasting and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations#Article_names is that the article name should reflect the actual call letters of the TV station. As can be seen here:  the call letters for this station are in fact WTTO. Any concerns regarding this topic would be best addressed here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television_Stations. A 07:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name 

message: I just added the main sentence from the WTTO_Tower article to this article under the "tower" section. I did not merge the articles. Dreammaker182 (talk) 23:24, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTTO Tower 
Talk:Bothell High School

message: A merger was actually proposed on the Music page almost 2 years ago, but whoever did that didn't follow up on it or even set up the tags properly.  That page has almost no references, and basically describes nothing other than a standard, albeit relatively good, high school music program.  The music department does not appear notable enough to have it's own article, so I definitely think it needs to be merged here.  We won't actually bring over most of the details, just a solid summary of a few paragraphs.  Qwyrxian (talk) 21:32, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Support merge -- I'm sure it's a great program, but doubt it deserves its own article. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:18, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

text: Support - as per nom. - Sitush (talk) 07:50, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge completed.  I actually brought over almost nothing, since none of the information there was cited, and it gave excessive detail about the various different clubs/classes. Such info is appropriate for a school website or catalog, but not a Wikipedia article.  No actual text was copied over, so no attribution issues.Qwyrxian (talk) 07:31, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merger Proposal 

message: BHS class of 1975
Captain of the Cornelia Marie (Discovery's Deadliest Catch)
:We will need a reliable source (or 2) to demonstrate that said person 1) Went to Bothell High School, and 2) is notable (for that we just need to verify he's regularly on the show, which could even be done with a discovery channel page link). Qwyrxian (talk) 13:17, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Addition of Captain Phil Harris to Notable Alumni section 
Talk:Aja of Kosala

message: In second phase of Battle of Ten Kings (in RV 1.018.19) after river Ravi the battleground (probably) shifted to the banks of river Yamuna, wherein the local chieftain Bhida was defeated along with three other tribes — Ajas, Śighras, and the Yakṣus by Sudas.Brereton, Joel P.; Jamison, Stephanie W., eds. (2014). The Rigveda: The Earliest Religious Poetry of India. Vol. I. Oxford University Press. pp. 880, 902–905, 923–925, 1015–1016. And Lord Rama's grandfather's name is also Aja . As Ajas were defeated near Yamuna river by king Sudas. This reference of location of this tribe is corresponds to the location of Kingdom (Mathura)  of King Shatrughan, brother Lord Rama mentioned in valmiki ramayan. And in latter epic Mahabharata Kamsa the King of Mathura is not mentioned as Suryavanshi ruler but as Chandravanshi ruler.
Therefore from above points conclusion derives the following chronology
*King Shatrughan,brother of Lord Rama killed Lavanasura and captured Mathura  on the Yamuna river. (As Shatrughan's grandfather's name is Aja so Rig Veda mentions tribe name Aja near Yamuna.
* After the period of Ramayana Mathura branch of Suryavanshi (Ajas) were defeated by King Sudas and it was replaced by Chandravanshi.
* And from there it came into hands of Chandravanshi King Kamsa 
It is simply a assumption of my mind by this references but please  tell the opinion on this. 
Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:29, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mentioning of name Aja in Rig Veda and similarities on valmiki ramayan account
Talk:Jacksonville State University

message: The article was tagged for primary sources, and needs further clean up. Jacksonville State University's own website shouldn’t be used for citations. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 18:15, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: the campus events section contains some lack of sources to establish notability. For example no RS or meaningful coverage about the free speech code thing, except a dead link to the political organization that gave out the 'award.' was it really noteworthy? did anyone else talk about it or care? 31.26.178.3 (talk) 16:40, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Primary sources
Talk:Chandra

message: Does anyone think that we could move this page to Chandra (diety) and make the Chandra page a redirect to Chandra (disambiguation)? I know that I've looked for the Chandra telescope without knowing its full formal name and have found this page instead. It could be frustrating. And with all the other meanings... 66.213.14.17 18:41, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I won't mind. The moon god might slightly be more notable than the satellite because there are plenty of Hindus and not as many astronomers but there are other references to Chandra so it may be best to disaming it. GizzaDiscuss © 02:07, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Also the satellite is named after the moon, Chandra in Sanskrit language.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:23, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems... 

message: The section "Other_aspects" might need some rework. --111.84.193.103 (talk) 02:36, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Paragraphs that require proper formatting and sourcing 

message: Make a page on chauthchandra, a festival of Mithila. RedSaurb (talk) 09:49, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Try WP:RA. Primefac (talk) 14:00, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chauthchandra