lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Deeside Consortium

message: The Deeside Consortium article admits that it is a stub.  It contains the words school (twice) and college. It contains four valid links giving the geographical area. What more context do you want at this stage of the article's development? -- RHaworth 09:08, 2005 Jun 12 (UTC)
*Yes, it does say it's a stub.  However I have no idea what it is about.  Has the college taken over control of the three schools?  Is it providing bulk purchasing for all 4 schools?  Are they working together to develop courses?  As it reads to someone who knows nothing about this, it is not encylopedic.  Stubs still need to give some idea what they are about and how that makes them notable. A few words about the purpose of the Consortium should clear this up.  I suspect that if someone completly explains the purpose of the Deeside Consortium, then the stub will no longer be needed since the article would be reasonably complete.  Vegaswikian 17:42, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: PROD tag
Talk:University of Seville

message: "It comprises of"
Top/ranked? of what?
This is an incorrect construction. The whole comprises the part; therefore, "It comprises..."
I prefer talking about the change to making it.
--Anonymous
: Be bold! Don't worry about it! Nobody will mind helpful changes! --Menchi 07:04, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Notes

message: Seville was recaptured from the arabs in the XIII century (1248).
It was recaptured by the King San Fernando the third.
Seville was founded by the phoenicians about 2.800 years.
The college that gave birth to the university dates back to the final of the XIV century.
The current building that hosts the rectorate is from the XVIII century.
After that, why even bother to continue reading such a poorly redacted article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.172.67.38 (talk) 15:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unaccurate article
Talk:Polybrominated biphenyl

message: These are texts from the original article which i don't know where to place... hell i don't even know what it means! So i'm placing them here temporarily until someone familiar with the subject decides what to do with them:
:Firemaster BP-6, major component is 2,2`,4,4,`5,5` –hexabromobiphenyl.
--Plastictv 06:35, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Placed here temporarily

message: The characteristics of the substance states that Dec(omposition) occurs at 300C, what does this mean? Thanks Jimaginator 13:48, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: i'm not sure either. You might want to check with the creator of this article: Boil1202. --Plastictv 14:44, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: It means it breaks down into simpler chemicals rather than boiling. Septentrionalis 15:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  What does Dec mean? 

message: Proposed to move to singular.
===Survey===
*Weak oppose; this subject is inherently plural. Not quite as inherently as Complex numbers, but that's why my opinion is weak. Septentrionalis 15:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: *Weak oppose; this subject is inherently plural. Not quite as inherently as Complex numbers, but that's why my opinion is weak. Septentrionalis 15:54, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: I'm not sure that this statement is correct:  "...although these animals were promptly culled."  I remember quite a tempest about a significant delay after the major feed supplier became aware the accident had happened before the farmers were contacted and the information shared. Many people I knew personally were affected, including a friend whose chickens had the highest level of contamination of any tested. Is this point worth researching further? I'm keeping track of the longterm effects of the poisoning with surveillance of the literature and have approached a university about a possible research project on a specific health issue involving young men born 1972 to 1975. Should this question be inappropriate, I apologize. The PBB poisoning of Michigan spread far beyond the state line.
Michmaade 19:44, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  "History" question 

message: I'm curious why the "Michigan PBB disaster" doesn't have its own page? It is one of the worst chemical incidents in the history of the United States. (PBB was in the food supply for most of the 9 million residents of the Lower Peninsula of Michigan for almost a year.)
Jdybka (talk) 06:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Michigan PBB disaster new page? 

message: — Assignment last updated by Nc1018! (talk) 17:23, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Toxicology
Wikipedia talk:Doppelganger account

message: There should, in my opinion, be a template that could be used for a type of account similar to doppelgangers, except to prevent non-impersonating, but still inappropriate, usernames (e.g. "Administrator", "Block me", etc.). --Gray Porpoise 21:23, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Wait... There's already Template:Doppelganger-other. --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 21:07, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure that's what he meant...Alex43223 T | C | E  04:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idea 

message: The article mentions something of a "justified" sock puppet. Would this be, for example, using another account to discuss an edit with someone who holds a grudge against you and therefore making it unbalanced? Timekeeper 13:48, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Doppelgangers are not justified sockpuppets; they are accounts created to prevent impersonation. They are similar usernames to the user's existing account, and are never, ever, used for editing, unlike sockpuppets, which are used for editing, and are intended to be unconnected to the user's existing account. For information on use of sockpuppets, the policy page is WP:SOCK. Essjay (Talk) 23:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: As discussed on WP:LAP, a new version has been written of the username policy, that essentially covers everything this page has to say (this page is admittedly kind of verbose). Hence it is suggested that this be merged and redirected there. >Radiant< 14:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Cherchell

message: Cherchell is listed on the Encarta map  and travel sites . Cherchel is the 1911 Encyclopedia entry .  Petersam 06:54, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cherchell or Cherchel

message: I removed this unsourced text from the "Ancient history" section:
:The town was originally an ancient Egyptian settlement dating back to 1500 BC. In the town archaeologists have found a lower half of a seated Egyptian divinity in black basalt, bearing a cartouche of the Pharaoh of Egypt Thutmose I.
I haven't seen evidence anywhere else that Egypt in 1500 BC (the New Kingdom) controlled anything west of Siwa. I've never read of pharaonic Egypt establishing colonies by sea, which I'm sure a settlement at Cherchell would have required. Even in the Ptolemaic era, when the Egyptians were in contact with the whole Mediterranean world, their realm only extended into eastern Libya (around Cyrene). The Britannica and Catholic Encyclopedia articles linked here say nothing of an Egyptian settlement, only of a Carthaginian one. And even if the Thutmose-era statue was found at Cherchell, it could have been an import, perhaps from the Roman era. Therefore, I am removing the text until it can be cited. A. Parrot (talk) 03:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ancient Egyptian settlement? 

message: This old reference also mentions it under the name "Julia Caesarea"; if that's accurate, it should be mentioned with a newer, better source. — LlywelynII 00:25, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Roman colony

message: Ok, I found the Wiktionary entry for the Punic word for "island". There's no "I" in the middle of it. It's also unclear what the "I" would be other than the same letter as "Y".
There doesn't seem to be any online source for the Punic word for "sand".  seems to be borrowed from Hebrew. How sure is Lipinski that that was the name? or was it just a conjecture based on Hebrew presumably being very close to what the Punic would've been? (Based on the Hebrew forms, "" is really either "" or "". No one seems to have either 𐤀‬𐤉𐤇𐤅𐤋 or 𐤀‬𐤉𐤇𐤋 encoded on the internet yet, though. Maybe it's hidden in a pdf somewhere?
Sorry not to be able to check this myself, but Google Books absolutely refuses to show or allow a search of the text on Lipinski's p. 405. — LlywelynII 23:37, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: ʾIy-ḥol
Talk:Goa Institute of Management

message: I did nt understand the reason why few of these kinda articles put for neutrality check
Wikipedia: Microsoft  <-- why did nt u keep this for neutrality check ??
:I have done changes in this article, i believe it now should confirm to NPOV. Navendu 09:37, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why should u keep this article for Neutrality check 

message: This article was created as advertising, and I'm suspicious of practically all the content.  To counter this advertising bias I shall cut the article down to almost nothing; please don't add anything unless it's both notable and verifiable. — ciphergoth 12:10, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Cutting to bare bones

message: Have cleaned the artlcle to greater extent and provided citations. Navendu 07:08, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  advert Removed 

message: The prominet persons link and the alumini link looks ugly....dont you guys thing something should be done???Sushanth aka Yessrao 21:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Looks Bad

message: Created a new page for patents symposium and have deleted redundant data from the GIM page here and linked the GIM page to the new page created.
Sushanth a.k.a Yessrao 10:32, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: New page for patents symposium
Talk:Bunge Global

message: This article is very short and missing just about everything useful! It needs a lot of work and currently resembles an advert as much as anything! A curate's egg 07:10, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Clean up

message: Most of the year numbers mentioned in the article are in the 34th century! Obviously something is wrong. (as of 9/29/2010)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valupedia (talk • contribs) 21:37, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year numbers are wrong

message: I have removed the section suggesting that Bunge has received "ongoing criticism" due to a perceived connection to animal cruelty by way of one of their board members having ties to the subject. Not only was this claim uncited, but it seems like a massive stretch to criticize an entire company for the action of one its board members' purported actions. Illini407 talk 18:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Animal Cruelty section
Talk:Kai (LEXX)

message: Why is there no photo?
there should be information on kai's brace weapon.
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by USER NAME OR IP (talk • contribs).
Is there still a problem with the style - I write formal English for a living and this article seemed perfectly reasonable to me, especially given the subject matter!!212.50.162.251 15:33, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am a little bit concerned about the notability tag this article "earned". I tried to improve it by adding some references. Perhaps someone can make some suggestions to improve the article, please tell us. I do not completely understand whats wrong with the article for being tagged. To much text and to less links?--LeananKite (talk) 16:17, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: notability tag
Talk:Pat Mills

message: Pat Mills also was editorially responsible for the creation of Misty (comics) - need to add this in at some point. I think this was before working on the launch of 2000AD but I'll confirm the details before adding it. Jenniscott (talk) 12:40, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I had a look through Thrill Power Overload and it says he successfully piloted Battle and Action to their launch but doesn't mention his input on Misty (although that doesn't mean he didn't). The only mention of Misty in the index is about Malcolm Shaw who did good work on Misty but he didn't live up to that when you came over to 2000 AD (although since he died of cancer soon after perhaps they hadn't given him a chance!!). (Emperor (talk) 13:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Pat's said in his CAPTION2005 interview that he created Misty, and I think it was also covered in the Comics Britannia ep on Girls & boys' comics - but need to dig out my references first. Pat's spoken highly of Malcolm Shaw and thinks he's likely to be the writer of a number of the more mystical/hippy/green stories in Jinty, but that will be a lot harder to get to the bottom of if true... Jenniscott (talk) 17:05, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes attribution is a bugger for some of those titles although there have been efforts to pin things down in some areas (the one I know about is Starblazer where a lot of work has been done). (Emperor (talk) 18:15, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misty 
Category talk:American psychologists

message: Should this be United States psychologists? ~ Dpr 07:18, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: "U.S." or "American"

message: While the topic above seems to be controversial, I hope the issue of definition of psychologist will be less so. The American Psychological Association has addressed this issue. Without going into a discussion of whether we should follow the guidelines of an American organization (APA style and referencing are commonly adopted outside the U.S.), or whether the APA should change its name to the "U.S. Psychological Association," it's difficult to come up with a better reference point. APA policy on the use of the title psychologist is contained in the General Guidelines for Providers of Psychological Services: "Psychologists have a doctoral degree in psychology from an organized, sequential program in a regionally accredited university or professional school" and suggests "refer[ence] to master's-level positions as counselors, specialists, clinicians, and so forth (rather than as 'psychologists')." (APA: About Us). -DoctorW 20:22, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of psychologist
Talk:Permission culture

message: Defaulpx|thumb  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.203.217.104 (talk) 05:07, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

message: I listed a second meaning of the term, which is actually the meaning I have more often heard used.  One source is artist Nina Paley's interview with WNET television in New York, at http://www.thirteen.org/sites/reel13/blog/nina-sings-the-copyright-song/445/ (she uses the phrase that way in the full interview, see the second, longer video on that page).  Is that a useful thing to cite? --Karl Fogel 03:33, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Second Meaning 

message: I was reading the linked NYT article from 2004, which references Permission Culture.
This seems notable to me, and the page is valuable.
Lawyer Peter Friedman writes on his blog at http://blogs.geniocity.com/friedman/tag/permission-culture/
 It’s almost impossible to find a publisher these days that would sign off on even that snippet of eight words, claiming that they don’t want the liability of a lawsuit. 
 I’ve had this discussion a few times with authors and publishers, and they all say the same thing: due to the potential liability of a lawsuit,
 even if it clearly does appear to be fair use, it’s just not worth using the quote.
This and other examples show that the idea of "you SHOULD seek permission first" rather than "fair use is the norm and always allowed" are cultural norms, and important ideas deserving of having their names available in Wikipedia.
Kip Bryan 29 July 2012  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kipb9 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable
Talk:Ed Broadbent

message: Some more could be said about Broadbent's political views, including quotes. By the way, is he really a social democrat or is he a socialist who belongs to a social democratic party? - no name
I find his Biography strange that it says they had no children and only adopted. I would like to suggest it is re-worked as follows;
That year, he married a young Franco-Ontarian widow, Lucille Munroe; the couple also adopted a baby girl, Christine and Ed became the stepfather to Lucille's son Paul Broadbent, who is a defence policy specialist with the Ministry of Defence in London, England. EnquiringMinds 05:27, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Do we have an exact date, concerning Broadbent's passing? GoodDay (talk) 23:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: I was unable to find any references to his death location (Ottawa). OhanaUnitedTalk page 06:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broadbent (1926-2024)
Talk:Psychodynamic psychotherapy

message: what kind of a bullshit description is this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.240.45.155 (talk) 07:34, June 14, 2005 (UTC)
:i agree, im givin it a shot. people, please make it better. JoeSmack (talk) 15:56, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
Completely disagree, this a great job,  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.44.160.88 (talk) 15:44, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Bullshit desciption

message: I think this needs something on the advantages and disadvantages of this approach, and a wider-ranging comparison with other modalities.  I can't do this, but came here looking for it and it isn't there.
Nineteenthly 14:03, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pros and cons 

message: The definition as it stands is presently is:
:Psychodynamic psychotherapy is a type of psychotherapy, usually meeting about once or twice a week.
This is recursive and explains nothing.  Will someone please fix this? --Sadi Carnot 23:06, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Same problem - I'm a lay reader looking for straight info on latest opinion/evidence on what works for what conditions.  I'm a sceptic looking to be convinced. Glarner 16:23, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: i agree. this is a very bad intro definition, and the rest can use much work. Platypusjones 13:46, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs solid intro definition 

message: The following text was under the heading "Objective": —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Meco (talk • contribs) 10:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree, lots of WP:OR too. JoeSmack Talk 05:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Unencyclopedic section removed 

message: The tin. Why are people with no academic credentials putting their own essays as sources for this article? The technique proportion of this article has barely any content and what's their isn't sourced correctly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.203.171.16 (talk) 16:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  why has a child cited their own essay as a source? 

message: "Psychodynamic psychotherapy is an evidence-based therapy (Shedler 2010) and its more intensive form, psychoanalysis is also evidence-based."
This is not a useful way to discuss any intervention. They aren't either "evidence-based" or "not evidence-based". It should be replaced by the quality of evidence for specific outcomes, and the strength and limitations of the evidence. S C Cheese (talk) 11:11, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussing evidence
Talk:Skan

message: Skan does not imply or describe a male creator in particular, rather the maker of makers, the mover of movers.
The source for the previous version of this page was "The Lakota Sweat Lodge Cards: Spiritual Teachings of the Sioux." The order of creation described was exactly the opposite of that documented elsewhere in reliable and credible literature. I have replaced it with a better academic definition of the word, which is short for Taku Skan Skan, and the proper description of the order of creation, in the Lakota Creation Myth. Shootingstar (talk) 11:35, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:
Talk:McCallie School

message: Could someone find a date for the Atlanta Journal-Constitution quote? It won't be "recently" forever. --ElfWord 08:28, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

message: As some may have noticed, there is an article under the title of "McCallie School" as well as one under the title of "The McCallie School". The two each contain different information, so I suggest they ought to be merged. However, I'm not sure of Wikipedia protocol for requesting that two articles be joined, though I know it's possible. Any thoughts?
-AgreedZephyrprince 19:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Yi Ku

message: Does Prince Gu have any sons or daughters who can become his heirs? – Kaihsu 12:45, 2005 Jun 20 (UTC)
:An adopted daughter; I don't know what her status is. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 18:26, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  heirs 

message: I should explain that I placed the alternative names in the summary because, when I was looking for details of his life and (more importantly) trying to confirm his death, I had no luck — until I realised that our article is one the very few that call him by this name.  Most Internet sources seem to use Yih Ku, or other variants.  Given that I'd been confused, i thought that other readers would be too, so I brought the alternative Romanisations into greater prominence. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 18:26, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Alternative names 

message: I've just removed another in a series of copyvio images up-loaded by .  I've also removed the following paragraph, which I'm completely unable to understand:
:"Lord Yi Won (李源 이원 i won) (b.1961), the only son of Prince Gap and also the cousin's son which the Prince Gu loved most to link for him was decided unofficially in a following head of Korean Imperial Household."
--Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 09:16, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Sissel111 has removed the copyvio template from the image and replaced the image in the article.  I've reverted this, and issued a warning. --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 14:58, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits 

message: Does anyone know who this is? --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 22:42, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: See Yi Won. -- Visviva 03:48, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yi Won? 

message: Per the naming conventions for (cough) monarchs, shouldn't this be at Yi Gu? -- Visviva 03:48, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Title

message: Should the pretended title 황태손 be included here?  It is verifiable and surely relevant to an article about someone whose lone notable attribute was his claim to the Joseon line.  The content was removed by an anon, but I have restored it for now. -- Visviva 13:53, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I've added "claimed" as an attempt at compromise; is that OK? --Mel Etitis  (Μελ Ετητης) 16:16, 27 July 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name table.
Talk:House of Golitsyn

message: I think there's enough here to separate out some separate biographies. Vasily in particular has quite a number of inbound links. -- Cyrius|✎ 09:27, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old talk 

message: * Miihkali Antreinpoika Golitsin was governor of Pihkova in the 1680s 82.181.234.211 (talk) 19:50, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  governors of Pihkova from this family 

message: Nicholas Galitzine, a british actor is a descendant of the Golitsyn family, someone should add him to the list. 2A01:C22:ADFF:7500:74C4:B710:E145:DE49 (talk) 06:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: He is already mentioned.Taksen (talk) 10:41, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  You are missing a famous Galitzine.