Talk:KAIST

message: Notable alumni: KAIST have many notable alumni, would be great if someone can make a list of them here.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Constfang (talk • contribs) 05:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  To work on 

message: Some of the sentences are not that well written. For example, 'united with ...' can be better expressed by 'merged with ...'.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hilkconue (talk • contribs) 03:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  A little bit broken English 

message: The introduction is not written in a neutral tone.  The third and fifth paragraphs are egregious examples.  They lack supporting sources and are rather vague in the claims.  The fourth paragraph is better, though the date for the ABET evaluation needs to be included.  WP:NPOV#Let the facts speak for themselves would be nice.  YooChung 05:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs neutral tone 

message: :Add  # Support  or  # Oppose  on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.  Please remember that this survey is not a vote, and please provide an explanation for your recommendation.
====Survey - in support of the move====
# Support Article title should use the full name.  Common usage of the abbreviation can be mentioned in the article itself. YooChung 00:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey

message: # Support Article title should use the full name.  Common usage of the abbreviation can be mentioned in the article itself. YooChung 00:03, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey - in support of the move

message: From the KAIST website:
"The Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) has decided to change its official name to "KAIST" in order to strengthen its identity and image as Korea's foremost academic and research institution and avoid being confused with research organizations with similar names.
KAIST's full name, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, will no longer be used officially. The decision was made through a series of faculty meetings.
Starting from Jan. 1, 2008, "KAIST" will be used as the university's official name in all documents, including research papers."''
Because of this new development I moved the article back to KAIST. --EnOreg (talk) 10:49, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  'KAIST' Decides Not to Use Original Full Name 

message: * The article is more of a promotional text than an encyclopedia article.
* The organization is not consistent with the standard Wikipedia guidelines.
* The gallery is indiscriminate and unorganized.
Please address these problems before removing the  and  templates. Kiersta 08:23, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: While the organization is much improved, I can't but help think that it reads too much like a brochure.  The tone itself is not neutral at all, and there are too many details that tend to hinder a general understanding of many sections.  It does look like the information in the article could make for a good article when organized and written appropriately, although there's a sad lack of third party sources. Kiersta (talk) 03:35, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Problems with article 

message: Shouldn't the five suicides (http://www.worldyannews.com/news/articleList.html?page=1&total=176&sc_section_code=&sc_sub_section_code=S2N24&sc_serial_code=&sc_area=&sc_level=&sc_article_type=&sc_view_level=&sc_sdate=&sc_edate=&sc_serial_number=&sc_word=&view_type=) and the pressure to oust the president of KAIST (http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/498708.html) be included?Kdammers (talk) 09:02, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent history 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on KAIST. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131012215618/http://40th.kaist.edu/history/kaist_history.do to http://40th.kaist.edu/history/kaist_history.do
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718022658/http://www.kaist.edu/bbs/share_body.php?req_P=ptb&req_PDX=0188e8b8b014829e2fa0f430f0a95961 to http://www.kaist.edu/bbs/share_body.php?req_P=ptb&req_PDX=0188e8b8b014829e2fa0f430f0a95961
*Added archive https://archive.is/20131220190533/http://physics.kaist.ac.kr/xe/nam_chang_hee to http://physics.kaist.ac.kr/xe/nam_chang_hee
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: It certainly looks impressive but... Is this material at all reliable? I come across people affiliated with KAIST who publish, shall we say, third-rate stuff (I am being polite) in third-rate journals, with yahoo email addresses. It is hair-raising to think this is the best uni in Korea! Either KAIST really is a decent place and people are falsely claiming to be affiliated, or KAIST is very much a mixed bag. 2A01:CB0C:CD:D800:49FB:85C7:A282:D3A5 (talk) 13:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rankings, standards