Talk:Across the River and into the Trees

message: This article was excerpted from a full review at this website: . Is there anything regarding copying the work of another author and placing it on Wpdia as one's one work? The original author changed a few words but it is mostly the same stuff - check it out. Does this count as plagiarism? If so, I think it should either be removed or at least rewritten. JMBell 22:17, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiarism

message: :Image:Hemingriver.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Hemingriver.jpg

message: "As in his other writing, Hemingway employs the style known as the iceberg theory in which much of the meat of the work lies below the surface of the plot itself."
Icebergs of meat? This is a very clumsy mixed metaphor. I hope no one object to my tweaking it.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.218.201.10 (talk) 11:51, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No objection at all! This article hasn't had the revision it needs and any help is appreciated. Truthkeeper88 (talk) 12:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mixed metaphor 

message: Are there different editions? In my 1966 Penguin, the novel extends over four days: Day 1 is Cantwell’s medical in Trieste; Day 2 he drives to Venice and meets Renata; Day 3 he leaves Venice and Renata to go to the duck shoot in the marshes on the mainland; Day 4 is the duck shoot and his death.
Hors-la-loi 15:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Differing chronologies and locales?

message: Can someone tell me how this review is one of the few "good reviews"? 
http://www.nytimes.com/books/99/07/04/specials/hemingway-river.html
Seems to me he is bashing him.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oweng4000 (talk • contribs) 15:27, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  John O'Hara 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Across the River and into the Trees. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120211083525/http://www.atlantic-times.com/archive_detail.php?recordID=13 to http://www.atlantic-times.com/archive_detail.php?recordID=13
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified