Talk:WTTW

message: Why is it when a correction is made, someone with no knowledge undo's the correction?  The intention of the FCC is to make channel sharing arrangements un-noticeable to casual viewers.  That is why most likely the original WYCC channel number 20-1, will continue to be used.  When WTTW buys the license of WYCC, the new owner gets a separate TV station with it's own call letters and channel number.  WYCC's must carry rights and channel assignment on cable and satellite will also continue.   — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.26.30.5 (talk) 20:07, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It seems to me that the hijacking incident doesn't really belong in detail either here or under WGN but rather as a historical incident should have its own article and just be mentioned on these two sites. I'd love to know more about it (having witnessed it when I was living alone --- I thought he was saying something about watching me and such but then decided nobody could be and went to the kitchen until it got fixed.) but don't think it deserves more of the WTTW article's real estate. --Jaibe 19:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  hijacking incident 

message: :Image:New d logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:New d logo.jpg

message: :Image:New create.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:56, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:New create.jpg

message: :Image:Wttw small.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 11:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Wttw small.jpg

message: Local and national media watchdogs have found that WTTW has several key challenges. 
Block quote <WTTW suffers from layoffs, an overpaid executive staff, embezzlement, and financial mismanagement. It appeals to for profit corporations for funds, staff, and board members. In fact, WTTW holds a place of infamy as being the only station fined by the FCC for excessive commercialism.>
 This in turn effects the quality of programming. There are few progressive television programs like Bill Moyers Journal or Now. Also a lack of non-white racial representation on shows such as Chicago Tonight, which itself rarely covers local, national, or international news perferring to cover mostly sports and entertainment.<FAIR's newsmagazine Extra! 2004> In general WTTW fails to </regularly present perspectives by labor unions, the poor and working class, ethnic minorities or any of the demographics which comprise Chicago>
. [[Chicago Media.0rg] [Fairness and Accuracy in Journalism]<Chicago Media.org><Fairness and Accuracy in Journalism>
P3avery (talk) 08:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  CRITICISMS 

message: Did WTTW, at one time, have a studio at the Museum of Science and Industry (in Chicago)?  I have a long-ago youthful memory of such, from a Museum visit in perhaps 1963 or 1964.  It may have been an exhibit, intended to illustrate how TV broadcasting is implemented. WHPratt (talk) 13:02, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Museum? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on WTTW. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130829004251/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100326033808/http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/03/see_you_at_the_movies.html to http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/03/see_you_at_the_movies.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I remember in early 2020 these channels were both broadcasting in 1080i. I just checked and they are now both 720p, does anyone know why this happened? EDIT: It appears I was not the only one to notice this. Here is someone's tweet from November 5th 2020 https://twitter.com/scharlesb/status/1324441208630947842 73.110.210.136 (talk) 01:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  1080i to 720p on 11.1 and 11.2 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:07, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion 

message: Thanks for reverting the Mr. Beast edit to the WTTW page! 2601:246:C200:3990:7442:D8F7:4B18:F5F7 (talk) 02:12, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone know why the citation 8 on Max Headroom redirects to Google, or is it just my computer? 35.134.104.128 (talk) 04:48, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Anyone know why the citation 8 on Max Headroom redirects to Google, or is it just my computer? nevermind that previous message TCK2009 (talk) 04:48, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mr Beast edit 

message: There is no FNX on 11.6. I should know, I live in Chicagoland, with an antenna that has WTTW. I've never seen FNX on 11.6... only on channel 22 I think.
Louis Campfield (talk) 00:52, 11 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I removed the 11.6 channel from the page. Techy95 (talk) 20:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: FNX on 11.6

message: Hi everyone! Can people update the WTTW Logo? The PBS Logo on it here is outdated, and I can’t update it myself.
Techy95 (talk) 20:14, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah! I have a distinct memory of the PBS logo being the flat one about a month ago, but now we have the skewmorphised version of the logo. That’s why I posted that! Techy95 (talk) 13:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: WTTW Logo

message: Copied over information from the WYCC page to the history section and trimmed it. WTTW had founded it as sister station WXXW, sold it to City Colleges, reacquired it 40 years later, and ultimately relinquished the license. Also removed the topic down from the lead segment for flow as it is no longer an active issue. I tried to pull the right amount over, but a second set of eyes would help, especially clean up on the references copied over. JKPrivett (talk) 19:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Paging  Mvcg66b3r (talk) 19:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  WTTW and WYCC (formerly WXXW) 

message: Wanted a second opinion before I went BE BOLD, but do others agree we can whittle down the three 2010-2014 layoff paragraphs to take out the names of most or all of the former employees? It feels more like an attempt to honor them than to focus on the actual history.
Draft edit:
On June 4, 2010, Window to the World Communications announced that it would lay off around 12% of WTTW and WFMT's employee base and extend a salary freeze instituted in 2009 for one additional year, in an effort to cut $3 million in operating costs due to declining revenue, effects from the economic downturn and the loss of $1.25 million in grant money from the Illinois General Assembly. Over the next four years, two high-level employees in communications and partnerships also saw their positions eliminated. JKPrivett (talk) 19:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, came to the talk page to ask why those people’s names were in there! 68.113.145.140 (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Layoff History