lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Bore evacuator

message: "The evacuator is a reservoir that holds the super-heated, high-pressure propellant gases produced by the firing of a shell, then releases them as the shell exits the barrel. When not in use, the atmosphere inside the barrel remains the same as the surrounding environment; thus it is the same, or nearly so, inside the evacuator."
Sorry, but I don't get anything from this. First, what is the mechanism by which the gases get stored in the reservoir ?... thus it is the same... ??
Without some explanation of the contruction and components of the evacuator, and the basic mechanics involved, this doesn't make sense. E.g. an explanation of what happens progressively from firing to shell leaving barrel to breech opening, and where the gas is at each point, would help. Rcbutcher (talk) 16:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you, that actually makes things much clearer than the article itself. Muad (talk) 00:21, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: I can't understand this

message: I would like to point out that there are only one series of holes at the turret end of the fume extractor not a set at both ends. The fume extractor is pressurized when the round travels past the openings in the barrel inside the fume extractor and when the pressure drops tin the barrel after the round has left the barrel allows the high pressure gas in the fume extractor to re-enter the barrel and blows the remaining fumes in the barrel out the muzzle. This all occurs before the breach is opened at the end of the firing cycle. I'm a retired Armoured Crewman and I've been stuck with cleaning the fume extractor more times than I wish to remember. 142.52.203.4 (talk) 18:27, 8 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Video Graphic
Template talk:Rfah

message: I was thinking of changing the language here a bit from "The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that has been placed on hold" to "The following discussion is preserved as a request for adminship that has been placed on hold", as this isn't really an archive yet, until the decision is made.  If no one objects in the next few days, I'll go ahead and change it. --After Midnight 0001 21:05, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tweak language
Talk:Chookiat Sakveerakul

message: His name, ชูเกียรติ ศักดิ์วีระกุล, is properly transliterated Chukiat Sakwirakun. RTGS is the only official system of transcription for Thai alphabet. --Exephyo (talk) 01:10, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: And "official" does not mean generally accepted. A person is free to spell his/her name as he/she pleases. --161.200.255.162 (talk) 17:17, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, but Wikipedia has rules and guidelines about this. Check out WikiProjects please. --Exephyo (talk) 20:22, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Talk:Palmaris longus muscle

message: The intro and the the body of this article state different figures (14% and 16% respectively) for the absence of this muscle. Does anyone know which ones is correct?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.71.59.99 (talk) 11:31, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Absence of Muscle? 

message: These images do not give a clear idea of where the muscle is located on the human body. Please add a better image! 49ersfanforlife (talk) 17:19, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: poor images
Talk:Coracobrachialis muscle

message: "It arises from the apex of the coracoid process, in common with the short head of the biceps brachii, and from the intermuscular septum between the two muscles."
Can't tell whether this "intermuscular septum" separates the biceps from the pectoral minor or not.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.5.154.148 (talk) 18:38, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Which two muscles? 
Talk:Anconeus muscle

message: Hi there, 
I have no medical background but to me it seems that the figure 'Muscles of upper limb. Cross section.' has a couple of incorrect muscle labels:
1) The label 'extensor carpi radialis longus' seems to be pointing to the common extensor tendon.
2) The label 'supinator muscle' seems to be pointing to the either the extensor carpi radialis longus or the brachio radialis.
Is this correct? Beuktank (talk) 00:59, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Incorrect labels in figure
Talk:Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System

message: It seems that Clawson codes really should be part of the overall information in Advanced Medical Priority Dispatch System. -- Whpq 21:39, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed the spelling of "Clawson." However, that page is a redirect back to this one. If you have an outside link to Clawson codes, that would be best. dafydd (talk) 00:02, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Clawson codes (merge)

message: from my understanding the OMEGA level is to be used for "bogus calls",
eg: patient needs help getting back in to bed, no injuries, no emergencies,
aka a soins humanitaires... doing a good deed for the patient.
purpleidea (talk) 20:34, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  OMEGA == SOINS HUMANITAIRES 

message: I've removed the following paragraph, as it is neither sourced nor neutral in its point of view:
<Blockquote>The software is used widely but its validity is constantly questioned by first reponders in the pre hospital care environment. It is often accused of responding emergency vehicles under fast lights and siren situations for no good reason. The cause of this falling on questions asked to callers that are deliberately kept simple to avoid confusion. For example, call takers ask callers if the "patient is breathing normally" rather than is "the patient is having difficulty breathing" which is considered too technical. Consequently, a patient who is nauseated and vomiting may be considered to be having difficulty breathing as the caller notices that the patient is breathing differently from normal when vomiting. Breathing whilst vomiting does often appear different from normal breathing. This does not mean the patient is having difficulty breathing. The result is an ambulance dispatched under emergency driving conditions that creates an increased risk of accident and potential harm to responding paramedics and the community alike regardless of the care taken whilst driving. An experienced paramedic taking a call would be able to differentiate between the breathing differences of someone vomiting and someone who truly is having trouble breathing. For cost effectivness AMPDS does not generally use medically qualified and experienced call takers. It uses call takers trained to use the software rather than those experienced in the pre hospital care environment. This is a major and on going criticism of the AMPDS software.</Blockquote>
~dom Kaos~ (talk) 02:07, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  POV Original research
Talk:Pronator quadratus muscle

message: Why the contraction of pronator quadratus produces pronation, and not supination? Think of it, unlike pronator teres, it is not attached to a more proximal fixed point like the medial border of the humerus. This muscle runs absolutely perpendicular to the radius and the ulna.
I have thought about it, and feel that when the forearm is supine, there's no further margin for supination, so the muscle acts to bring the radius closer to the ulna, and not vice versa. And, when the forearm is pronated fully, the muscle must be getting so much relaxed (consequently, also shortened) that its contraction cannot further shorten the fibers, hence no movement occurs in this position.
Well, this is just a guess. It'd be nice if someone approves of it, or corrects my ideas. Regards.
Ketan Panchal, MBBS (talk) 19:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A doubt
Talk:Phrynomantis microps

message: I added the common name of the frog to the lead section. Additionally, I added where the frog can be found and a descriptor of the frog in the lead section. I also think there should be a citation for the diet of the tadpole, but I do not know what article was used by the prior editor to find this information. 
Friedaloo (talk) 20:22, 18 Oct 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friedaloo addition

message: — Assignment last updated by Anikavarsani (talk) 20:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Wiki Education assignment: Behavioral Ecology 2022

message: First of all, great job! Your post is super interesting, and the current contents explain the frog in a comprehensive manner.
For Home range and territoriality section, I think it is super interesting that the frog exhibits no evidence of territoriality. I think it would be great if you could add that in your description briefly as well.
For Diet section, you could add more details into each subsection. You could add a overall description of the frog’s general diet, regardless of age. For Juvenille subsection, maybe you could explain more what suspension feeder means. For Adult subsection, you could maybe expand a bit more on why they do not seem to feed on the ants in which they share their burrows, and what the research suggests.
For Protective coloration and behavior section, you could add some pictures of tadpoles. Turturenhydra (talk) 11:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Peer Review Comments
Talk:Mobile wad

message: On with Wikipedia page on the forearm, it is indicated the forearm only has two compartments [" In cross-section, the forearm can be divided into two fascial compartments. The posterior compartment contains the extensors of the hands, which are supplied by the radial nerve. The anterior compartment contains the flexors and is mainly supplied by the median nerve."].
This article adds a lateral compartment.  Is it a true compartment?  I wish the two articles were in sink. 140.228.217.193 (talk) 01:20, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  How many forearm compartments?
Talk:Caroline's a Victim

message: As articles are about songs and not singles, I've placed a split tag here so that each of these two songs has its own article.  Will provide many examples if needed and will split these if no objections.... - eo (talk) 14:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: How are articles about songs and not singles? On reflection it appears the single is called "Caroline's a Victim" with "Birds" its b-side anyway, so I'll request a move - rst20xx (talk) 18:18, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Split tag
Talk:Extensor digitorum muscle

message: Given how common hand injuries are - and that there are two tendons attached to the index finger and the little finger, is there any way for a lay person (or even a medic) to find out which of the tendons (extensor indicis proprius, furthest from the surface of the flesh, and extensor digitorum communis, closest to the surface of the flesh) has been cut after a hand injury to the outside of the hand?  
(I gather that, if only one of the tendons has been cut, it is sometimes not possible to discern if either of the tendons has been damaged at all after the associated wound has healed).  
Ulstrasound can be used to figure out which tendon has been cut, but I strongly feel that there should be some low tech "mechancial" way (using a pencil probe) of determining (with likelihood) if either tendon has been cut (the idea being that a cut tendon exhibits lower tension than the tendon on the opposite arm and that this could be judged with a pencil probe.  
Is there ANY low tech way of determing which tendon has been cut?
LouiseBatchelor9122 (talk) 23:51, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about hand injuries
Talk:ArmorGroup

message: If this is a British company then why is the Armour in ArmorGroup spelt in American English? --Climax Void ☭.
Armorgroup was previously owned by Armor Holdings, an American Company, hence the spelling.
The US and UK divisios seem to have split apart into seperate companies. RichardBond (talk) 09:56, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Spelling!?
Talk:Groupe Canal+

message: I must say that I'm pretty confused about the structure of the whole company, even after putting considerable effort into cleaning up and adding to the histories of the group and channel articles. I am really not clear as to whether there is still a separate entity relating to :Canal+ (French TV provider), which is hardly cited at all. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: There definitely used to be a separate legal entity for Canal+ (French TV provider), it was CanalSatellite SA, I’m unsure if this entity still exists though. Professional Adriazeri (talk) 10:19, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, thanks for that, I know. I have to take a break from Canal+ now. This source may help. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion  - merge Canal+ (French TV provider) into this one?
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Imprecise probability

message: It is certainly true that the main (html) hits on Google about I.P. are related to SIPTA society or the ISIPTA conferences. Nevertheless, the importance of this field is certified by the (huge) number of  publications about this theory on any public repository of scientific papers related to AI and Statistics. 
Furthermore, most of the major theories of uncertainty are simply subsets of I.P., and with this article (which is going to be developed in a more technical direction) I indend to report these facts.
Alessandro antonucci 13:34, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Wick, West Sussex

message: I had nothing to add except the changed community URL but the website at the previous URL had become only an advertisement for satellite TV services etc. unrelated to the Wick, West Sussex (Littlehampton) community. The URL page I have put in does unfortunately have a containing frame of a particular (christian) church, but it is linked to from the Littlehampton Town Council website as a community website, and is the only such. The Wick Community Centre is apparently a secular public service for that community, and this page, although embedded in a church website, is apparently its only web presence so the association is unavoidable. Iph (talk) 14:55, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
Talk:Abductor pollicis longus muscle

message: I removed the following redundant images from the article. --19:08, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Gallery

message: What about the merge discussion pertaining to this article?  You think ignoring it and continuing to revert is legitimate?--Taylornate (talk) 19:49, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, the notion that individual muscles do not deserve separate articles should be ignored.  --Fama Clamosa (talk) 20:03, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? Because you say so?  There is consensus to keep the merge.--Taylornate (talk) 20:18, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text:  I can't believe I am trying to convince a self-styled surgeon that individual muscles in the human body are important enough to have separate articles.  There is absolutely no consensus anywhere to keep a merge.  You have been reverted by half a dozen other contributors and you keep insisting that your preferred talk page is the only legitimate place to discuss this.  Stop now! --Fama Clamosa (talk) 20:29, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I've been reverted by exactly two other editors, neither of whom justified their position with Wikipedia policy.  I did back my position with Wikipedia policy and had support from other editors.  Until those against the merge can do so, there will be a clear consensus in favor of the merge.  Your complaint about location of discussion is silly when you refuse to discuss here as well.--Taylornate (talk) 20:48, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

text: No, I don't want to discuss anything with you.  I've added all the information and all the references now present in the Extrinsic extensor muscles of the hand article and if you don't care about individual muscles, ignore those articles (just like I'm doing my best ignore a self-styled surgeon who claim muscles aren't important).  I've added all the information you "created" using my references at Hand#Extrinsic and your article is redundant. --Fama Clamosa (talk) 20:18, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I have not said muscles are not important.  Did you even read my post?  Why did you tell me to discuss on the talk page if you aren't willing to participate?--Taylornate (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge
Talk:Extensor pollicis brevis muscle

message: I thing this muscle have additional action is to prevent the flexion of the meta_carpo phalangeal joint when the flexor pollicis longus flexes the terminal phalanx (the reference lec of anatomy of the 1st stage of baghdad college of medicine ) thank you very much --User:Usersief (moved from article by eug (talk) 09:38, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  MCP joint 
Talk:Timawa

message: ::As free men who were more than servants but less than nobility, members of the Timawa class were free to pick their jobs - as soldiers, merchants, etc. They were also free to pick their own wives. They could have servants (alipin), and own property such as land or houses of their own. Consequently, this was the only social class for whom tax payment was required.
Thank you for adding these facts. I seem to recall this from my elementary history lessons.  Would you by any chance have a definitive source that indicates these facts? I'm pretty sure Scott covers them as well, but I haven't really had all that time to review his book more. Besides, we could use more references here. :-)  I will also add a few more references very soon, to corroborate scott. Alternativity 13:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Rights and Responsibilities of the Timawa

message: So basically if a Timawa (not including the lower timawa classes) were to have relationships with the children of the datu or any of the princesses illegitimate children, would that be considered incest?!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.147.20.110 (talk) 07:08, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Timawa related to datu/maginoo class?
Talk:Abductor digiti minimi muscle of hand

message: Abductor digiti minimi is, according to my personal references and poor knowledge of Latin, the most common and correct name of this muscle.  Anyone mind moving the page to Abductor digiti minimi muscle (hand)? --Fama Clamosa (talk) 11:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Most common name
Talk:John Haygarth

message: There is now an online source for John Haygarth's book. "On the Imagination as a Cause & as a Cure of Disorders of the Body" I am not concerned enough to check through this, but it would be an important source for rewriting this page. Plus it can provide an image. I simply do not have time to do this myself. --LittleHow (talk) 08:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  opportunity for research 
Talk:Lumbrical of the hand

message: We need more information as to what exactly these muscles do. And, in addition to the technical details we need them stated in plain English too. e.g. an anatomy book (https://www.kenhub.com/en/library/anatomy/lumbrical-muscles-of-the-hand) says this "The reason for the opposite actions is that the tendons cross the MCP on the palmar side, but distally insert at the dorsal side of the finger." If someone knows what it means and can find a suitable source, perhaps this could be included too.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lehasa (talk • contribs) 02:07, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inadequate information as to their function
Talk:Dorsal interossei of the hand

message: regarding...
subtitle: Function
sub-subtitle: Metacarpophalangeal joint flexion
...reference is often made to "MP joint", from my poor knowledge standpoint, i wonder if this is the same as MCP joint, if so i think more resource would be availible to readers is it was changed from MP to MCP in the article. Alternatively, i could be wrong, if so, i'm sure others would also benefit from clarifation.
ref: >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metacarpophalangeal_joint  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.66.97.55 (talk) 19:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Pheophytin

message: A discussion is taking place to address the redirect :Phacophytin. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 16#Phacophytin until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion.  Mdewman6 (talk) 07:48, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Phacophytin" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Paul Smith's College

message: Glad to see that someone has started a famous alumni section-- for a 61-year old college, there have to be more than two famous alums, though.  If anyone at the college sees this, I would suggest checking with Admissions, Public Relations, the Library or the President's Office-- someone there is almost certainly keeping track of these. -- Mwanner | Talk 22:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Famous Alumni 

message: They could have settled it just as they do with a football game, for example, "Paul Smith's College, Presented by Joan Weill".  2600:1004:B14C:D9B9:B5CB:C41B:5B2F:8629 (talk) 13:59, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Naming controversy 

message: Paul Smith's College is now offering graduate degrees. See https://gradschool.paulsmiths.edu/.
DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 17:20, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Graduate degree(s)
Talk:Mukim

message: A more appropriate translation of the word mukim is "WARD" Keep88 13:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  The equivalent word is not sub-district 

message: 2299505871  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.207.191.208 (talk) 14:31, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Iqama
Talk:Stirland (Warhammer)

message: I have trouble believing that this article is on the "needs to differentiate between fact and fiction" list. The very first words specifically mention that Stirland is part of the Warhammer Fantasy universe, and then there are repeated references to Dwarfs, Halflings and the Undead. Surely that's enough? If people can't tell that this is a fantasy universe being discussed from those few unsubtle clues, I'd say that's more their problem than that of the article's writers. AngryAngryMan 13:55, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:John Cotton

message: Each entry among the following should, when an article is written for it, be copied to the accompanying Dab page (and, in many cases, edited there to conform to MoSDab), and the copy struck thru.--Jerzy•t 19:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: --Jerzy•t 19:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

text: --Jerzy•t 19:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed RedLink'd Entries
Talk:Zach Gill

message: OK, so Mr Gill scrapes past my 'notability' radar (just), but the article reads like the bio from a press release or magazine article. An encyclopaedia article ... not so much.
The need for authoritative referencing speaks for itself.
Wayne 13:20, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added 2 x issues tags [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] tagging Comment 

message: This is useful for additional sourcing & building out a bio/personal life/career section; I just don't have the bandwith to do it right now, otherwise I would. https://www.independent.com/2020/09/02/exploring-zach-gills-manic-and-musical-multiverse/ ɯɐɔ 💬 21:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Useful source
Talk:Catlettsburg Refinery

message: Laredo, Texas has a referenced claim to be the largest inland port in the USA, and there is no reference for the claim in this article.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Langhorner (talk • contribs) 13:43, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The Port of South Louisiana handled 233 million short tons in 2008 according to the port's website and would also appear to be an inland port that beats out Catlettsburg.  Claims of port size are a contentious affair.  The List of world's busiest port regions article and :Category:Lists of ports category may also be of interest. 69.119.24.98 (talk) 03:56, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest inland port?
Talk:Comic BomBom

message: There's nothing here about the Mario manga series of books which they've released. --Victory93 (talk) 09:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mario manga 