Talk:Bulgarian views on the Macedonian language

message: Francis, I do not understand your vandalising behaviour.  You just appeared and disregarded my note and also did not even read the sources. 
For example, in the Macedonian section of the Political Views article, nobody has put any sources and you do not vandalise it.  Do we have to qualify every Macedonian political view as the view of its concrete author? (VMRO 20:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism on the part of FrancisThyers 

message: I recently stumbled upon this article and cannot see how it fits into Wikipedia. Correct me I'm wrong but have we started to make articles devoted to the way one cultures sees another? I do not see the use of this type of article. This would be like having an article called "French views on the English language" or "Russian views on the Italian language". Ireland101 02:49, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Finally, a smart person. Just a heads up - either the Bulgarians won't respond or will defend the article. To get them to so much as comprehend how pointless this article is someone will have to actually create an article like "French views on the English language". Alex202.10.89.28 03:25, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: And why not? French language influenced English language to a very large extent, so French has a right to voice their view on how the words they invented were changed by the English. In the same way, Bulgarians have the right of view on how their language is handled and mishandled in Skopje. --Lantonov (talk) 15:54, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Point of Article? 

message: I agree that the article at this stage is a complete nonsense:"... the Slav-speaking people of the regions of Bulgaria (Moesia), Thrace and Macedonia generally referred to their language as Bulgarian and called themselves Bulgarian without that necessarily signifying any sort of national awareness." So the people called themselves Bulgarians and their language Bulgarian but they didn't mean this? They were only joking? What did they mean by Bulgarian? Lantonov (talk) 16:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: The article is pointless and non-sensical

message: I have nominated this article for deletion as it has no place in an encyclopedia and only pushes nationalistic POV from nationalistic sources. The bulgarian view is already explained enough in  Political views on the Macedonian language Capricornis (talk) 19:48, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nominated for deletion: see [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bulgarian_views_on_the_Macedonian_language]] 

message: I agree that a move is not that bad of an idea, but the article should be merged into the other as whole, with all its points. But that would make Political views on the Macedonian language rather unbalanced. I mean we'd have three small sections and one enormous. --Laveol T 13:27, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes, good idea merge it and remove this article. A merge would be better. Also not every point is necessary? eg widespread use of Serbian personal names?? What kind of an article uses points like this. ? Merge is necessary PMK1 (talk) 09:30, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge