Talk:Angel of Grief

message: I believe that there are many versions of this work scattered around the USA, and perpahs beyond.  The original is in Rome, after all.  So I invite everyone to look around ab=nd let's get a great inventory going.  More tomorrow.  02:31, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: The spelling strongly suggests that this was an UNSIGNED suggestion by me. Carptrash (talk) 02:51, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Many versions

message: :Image:Teapartyangel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:07, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Teapartyangel.jpg

message: :Image:Odesangel.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:56, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Odesangel.jpg

message: " (except the death date on the sculpture reads "1895", which certainly suggests its date of creation is not 1894)"
Someone had added this at the beginning of the article and while it might seem "obvious", well it's another of the reasons why the word "obvious" is on my list of 23 words and phrases that mean " in my opinion."  Both William and Emelyn Story died in 1895 and it is very likely that the work was already completed before she passed on in January of that year.  It was Story's last work, and I feel (another term for my opinion that we should leave the date as 1894.  Carptrash (talk) 22:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, obviously Story 'finished' his work 1895? Someone has to look at the References again. Hybscher (talk) 02:44, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  I just moved this here to talk about it 

message: the gallery out a bit.  Two pictures of the same work is a lot.  We have three and even four of the same statue.  Too much.  Feel free to leap in, or wait and see what i do.  Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 02:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am going to thin 

message: More information on this one is needed.  According to the author's notes at the back of my copy of Charlie St. Cloud (paperback with movie poster cover), the prop department added many dummy gravestones to North Vancouver Cemetery in order flesh it out visually.  So far I have not been able to find a photo of this statue - not even a screenshot of the film.  Usually if you google "angel" + the cemetery name for any of the stones listed on this page for the USA, you can usually find at least one floating around on Flickr or DeviantART.  Sounds like some legwork needs to be done to confirm whether or not the angel shown in the film is an original fixture in the cemetery, or was a set piece for the film.  AmyTheSpiritSeeker (talk) 09:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  North Vancouver Cemetery/Charlie St. Cloud 

message: On the same trip that led to the discovery of the Guiterrez monument at Forest Park Lawndale in Houston, I came across another stone in the cemetery that depicted the Angel of Grief, but it was as a 2D image carved into an upright stone.  I am not sure if this should be included in the list or not.  You can view it on FindAGrave, Memorial #114373836, and evaluate it.  AmyTheSpiritSeeker (talk) 07:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Do 2D images on headstones count?