lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:2007 Nationwide Tour

message: I have created this as a holding page. In order to avoid having two separate lists of current results (possibly with different formats that would be hard to merge, as was the case with 2007 European Tour, which was started but soon abandoned) it makes sense not to do tour by year articles until the end of the year, when there is more information that can be added, eg top money winners charts and details of award winners. That is how things were done last year too. Mowsbury 18:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:2007 Challenge Tour

message: I have created this as a holding page. In order to avoid having two separate lists of current results (possibly with different formats that would be hard to merge, as was the case with 2007 European Tour, which was started but soon abandoned) it makes sense not to do tour by year articles until the end of the year, when there is more information that can be added, eg top money winners charts and details of award winners. That is how things were done last year too. Mowsbury 18:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:2007 Ladies European Tour

message: I have created this as a holding page. In order to avoid having two separate lists of current results (possibly with different formats that would be hard to merge, as was the case with 2007 European Tour, which was started but soon abandoned) it makes sense not to do tour by year articles until the end of the year, when there is more information that can be added, eg top money winners charts and details of award winners. That is how things were done last year too. Mowsbury 18:22, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2007 European Seniors Tour

message: I have created this as a holding page. In order to avoid having two separate lists of current results (possibly with different formats that would be hard to merge, as was the case with 2007 European Tour, which was started but soon abandoned) it makes sense not to do tour by year articles until the end of the year, when there is more information that can be added, eg top money winners charts and details of award winners. That is how things were done last year too. Mowsbury 18:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Talk:List of Magic: The Gathering novels

message: Added some clarification to book numbering/non-numbering.  Clayton Emery, Feb 8, 2007.
The Odyssey cycle links are broken. This section is supposed to be about the novels, and it links off to the Odyssey card cycles. witcheemon 20th Feb 2011.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.111.71.9 (talk) 10:39, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

message: I was perusing The Duelist issue 4, which on page 24 had an advertisement for Acclaim Comics Magic: The Gathering: The Comic Book Series. It states it would first publish in March 1995, and include an MTG card with each comic; two issues would be published each month. Mindmatrix 19:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: It is later mentioned in the same issue in "WotC News - Magic Comics coming from Acclaim" (p. 88). Mindmatrix 20:17, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Early comic
Talk:Japanese aircraft carrier Chitose

message: I am not an expert in naval history, or naval terminology however, Wiki defines a ship’s complement as “the number of persons in a ship's full company, including both commissioned officers and crew.”  (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complement)
The General Characteristics box lists the complement of Chitose as 800.
The external link provided at the bottom of the page lists the complement as 800.
(http://www.voodoo-world.cz/ww2car/ships/japan/cit_ciy.html)
The Wiki article on Chitose states:  “she rolled over to port and nosed under, with the loss of 903 men. The Isuzu rescued 480 men, and Shimotsuki a further 121.”  
Combined Fleet (http://www.combinedfleet.com/Chitose.htm) states:  “At 0937 CHITOSE lay right over on her port side and nosed under with the loss of Captain Kishi Yoshiyuki and 903 officers and men. The ISUZU rescued 35 officers and 445 men and SHIMOTSUKI rescued 121 officers and men.”   
If 903 were lost (dead) and 601 (480 + 121) were rescued, that would make the total complement an astounding 1,504 for a light carrier with no aircraft onboard.  Super-carrier Taiho, by contrast, had a complement of 1,751.
Also, can we assume that Chitose’s full complement was not taken on the suicide mission to Leyte (minus air crews, minus aircraft support crews, perhaps some others were left behind), making the total compliment less than 800?
Not trying to start an argument here.  Just trying to understand the numbers.  StyloK (talk) 17:15, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Casualties Aboard Chitose 

message: William L. Moore of dive bomber squadron 15 (VB-15) flying off the U.S.S. Essex received the Navy Cross for making a direct hit on the Chitose Class aircraft carrier (https://valor.militarytimes.com/hero/21405). 2603:800C:2A00:16E:89F4:C71:2358:4805 (talk) 02:17, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chitose Sinking
Talk:Fiat Multipla

message: Two cars/lines from different eras (50s/60s and 90s/2000s); perhaps vaguely similar in intent, but really this article is covering two different things and for that reason should be split into two. It might encourage more detail on the older Multipla to be added too. Fourohfour 18:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the '50s/'60s 600 Multipla should be merged with the existing Fiat 600 page, since it is merely a variation of that model. Marshall Stax 01:22, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done; if the 600-based model warrants its own article, that's fine; if it doesn't, it belongs more closely in the Fiat 600 article anyway. Fourohfour 11:10, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Split proposal

message: This page needs a picture of the redesigned Multipla.79.2.242.95 23:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs picture of current version 

message: Top Gear (original format) made this car of the year in 2000. Djcater 04:11, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Car of the Year 

message: I do not find that article relevant and anyhow trustworthy. It is not an aftermath of any vote. It is just a bunch of pictures of cars, which most of them are not ugly.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.229.210.149 (talk) 10:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top 50 ugly cars 

message: I trimmed this section on a single modified car as it appears irrelevant. I would suggest deleting it entirely but perhaps it should be discussed first.  Mr.choppers | ✎  17:42, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi , Personally I would support removing, Plenty of YouTubers mess around with cars so I don't see why 1 Youtuber should have a section over others who obviously don't. Their YouTube is all in French and none of their videos have made it into the news so I dont really see why they'd need a section or what makes them special over anyone else?. –Davey2010Talk 19:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Vilebrequin 1000tipla
Talk:Long Island Rail Road rolling stock

message: I don't see anything about the use of Budd Rail Diesel Cars by the LIRR, but they used to brag about having them for East End Fishermen's Special trains. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  04:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Budd RDC's 

message: Is there particular reason that this page doesn't have a listing the of LIRR fleet? SportsFan007 (talk) 23:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have no idea, but there really should be one. ---------User:DanTD (talk)  13:48, 16 March 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I have thought of the same thing for the longest time. If anything I can try to look up the rosters and add the tables. Davidng913 (talk) 15:41, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fleet listing
Talk:Russian cruiser Admiral Nakhimov (1885)

message: I propose we rename this from "Russian armoured cruiser Admiral Nakhimov" to "Admiral Nakhimov (Russian armoured cruiser)". Comments? Jason Quinn (talk) 14:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: strongly object - This violates Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships), which has defined the titles of hundreds of military ship articles, and is inconsistent with the style of dozens of articles on ships of the Imperial Russian Navy.--MChew (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename? 

message: The age old and interesting matter of quite how the Russian Navy had the plans for this ship - so obviously similar to the Imperieuse - ready to proceed with even before the British example was launched.
Did the Russian Navy employ espionage to acquire copies of the British plans? Is there any documentary evidence of this? Is this a topic which would warrant subsequent inclusion in this article? 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:D1D3:3F8E:1DDF:2B4D (talk) 12:46, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  'Based on ''Imperieuse'' class'
Talk:Paul Bissonnette

message: The file :File:Paul Bissonnette.jpg, used on this page, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons and re-uploaded at :File:Paul Bissonnette.jpg. It should be reviewed to determine if it is compliant with this project's non-free content policy, or else should be deleted and removed from this page. Commons fair use upload bot (talk) 01:08, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fair use candidate from Commons: [[:File:Paul Bissonnette.jpg]] 

message: Who wrote this twitter section? It's completely unecyclopedic and biased in favor of Bissonnette. It does nothing but praise him and say how funny and interesting his tweets are. Can someone please provide a justification for why it deserves to be in the article? And, if there is good reason to keep it, it needs to be seriously re-written for neutrality. Tad Lincoln (talk) 04:43, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Twitter 
Talk:Russian battleship Oryol

message: There is a move discussion in progress which affects this page. Please participate at Talk:Japanese battleship Tango - Requested move and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 14:17, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: There's a nice illustration of the ship by Oscar Parkes available in this journal that can be uploaded to en.wiki (Parkes died in 1958, so they won't be PD in the UK until 2028). Parsecboy (talk) 19:15, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: There's a photo of the ship available in this journal that can be uploaded to en.wiki. Parsecboy (talk) 19:50, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Images available
Talk:Japanese cruiser Yoshino

message: A reader contacted Wikimedia via OTRS to report:
Each of the following pages in Wikipedia has the same error:
Japanese cruiser Matsushima
Japanese cruiser Itsukushima
Japanese cruiser Hashidate
Japanese cruiser Naniwa
Japanese cruiser Takachiho
Japanese  cruiser Yoshino
Each of these warships participated in the Battle of the Yalu fought on 9/17/1894. Each of the above Wikipedia articles gives specific details about the number of shells fired, and/or hits received. In each and every case the source of reference for those details is the same. The source is quoted as a book entitled "The Sino-Japanese War of 1894-1895: Perceptions, Powers and Primacy" by S.C.M. Paine. Each reference lists the pages 133-134 as the source.
I have a copy of the book and the pages 133-134 refer to a prior naval engagement that took place on 7/25/1894 and only the Naniwa was present. The book does describe the Battle of the Yalu but only in general terms; not even the names of the ships involved are mentioned.
The writer may have cited the wrong source, but the source cited in each of the above articles is most assuredly incorrect.
I believe the book used to cite the claims is:
* 
I did not find the information in the book. I hope some editor can either verify that the information is in the source, identify a different source to support the claims, or remove the claims.--S Philbrick(Talk) 02:18, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Issue regarding a source 

message: Available here on the plate between pages 48 and 49. Parsecboy (talk) 20:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Image
Talk:Russian battleship Peresvet

message: The infobox states that the ship was renamed Peresvet after being bought back from the Japanese.  However, it is then said to be named for the Battle of Chesma, not the original person for which it was named.  It's named for something whose name it does not share, and not for the original namesake?  How is this possible? --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 16:03, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Renamed for different reason?
Talk:Belly chain

message: The photo of the woman in the bikini wearing the belly chain.. isn't this too provocative for an encyclopedic article? You can clearly make out her nipples and vagina through her tight clothes. I don't think it's necessary to have something on the verge of pornographic for a piece of jewelry, Could we not find something more informative only? --Yurimxpxman (talk) 09:01, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: That photo was misleading. I've replaced it with a proper one. Thanks for your suggestion. Tanvir 07:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  That photo 
Talk:Russian battleship Retvizan

message: This claim seems rather dubious - from Friedman, it seems that the only influence on the Maine design was to spur an increase to 18 knots - and it's also worth pointing out that the tender from NNS&DC was accepted, not the one from Cramp & Son. Parsecboy (talk) 20:38, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: I've removed the claim - seems McLaughlin is confused, since the Cramp design wasn't chosen for the Maine class. Parsecboy (talk) 12:32, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Basis for the ''Maine''s?
Talk:Selective catalytic reduction

message: I thought the reaction 2NO -> N_2 + O_2 was thermodynamically favorable, at least at low temperatures. Why isn't this reaction catalyzed? Scythe33 (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Now you are getting into the fun stuff. See the section below. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 04:58, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Uhh... 

message: Since my body won't let me work any more, and I've now been out of the business for over two years, I'm going to write a book on Catalytic Converters. I'm one of the few people who isn't in the business who qualifies as an expert, understands the chemistry, the physics, and how engines work. Because I worked in the business for over ten years, I have names in my rolodex for people who work at every company, to help me fill in the blanks.
Besides, after seeing some of the stuff that has happened on this page over the years, well you folks need a reference that you can use that is reliable. I'm posting this here because I know what I think should be in the book, but I don't know what you think should be there. What questions would you like to see answered? Let me know on my talk page.
Yes, there will be a section on Selective Catalytic Reduction. UrbanTerrorist (talk) 04:58, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Catalytic Converters - The Book 
Talk:List of Fireball XL5 episodes

message: Bobfos 23:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

message: The fan site on Angelfire doesn't seem to have either a GFDL license or, at first blush, any means of contacting the author, but it's the only place I've found with actual episode synopses.  I was tracking down a childhood memory, and was quite surprised that Wiki didn't have such synopses, so I've rewritten the great bulk of them (with attribution) and included them here.  I'll rewrite them further as I rewatch the episodes –which I haven't seen in over forty years, after all!  If that's not fair game & fair use, my bad and apologies in advance. kencf0618 (talk) 16:00, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rewritten Synopses
Talk:Samuel French

message: Removed details about the other Samuel French. A new page should be created and a disabmiguation link should be added.--ThatsNotFunny 18:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other Samuel French 
Talk:Concrete Jungle (Black Label Society song)

message: Who directed the animated video for "Concrete Jungle"? Or drew the character designs?  Mr JM  00:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Video Director
Talk:Appley Dapply's Nursery Rhymes

message: Since this work has been published in 1917 is it correct to state that it is in public domain right now? Should the article mention it? According to "How to Determine Whether a Work is in the Public Domain" it should be, regardless of whatever count one considers... however, I cannot find any confirmation of it anywhere, and this particular book is not in the Online books library. B.Trafficlight (talk) 03:39, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should article state that this work is now in public domain? How can this can be confirmed?
Talk:Minneapolis sound

message: I added a citation needed.  They do resemble the Minneapolis Sound, but did the record here, or were they associated with Prince somehow?
: They were from Detroit.  They MIGHT have been produced by Jam and Lewis, but I'm not sure.
:Mitchberg 18:58, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Ready for The World

message: I don't believe they should count under The Minneapolis Sound, it's definately an influence on their sound, but I don't think it strictly adheres to the genre's defining sounds. I also believe the P-Funk should be listed as a Stylistic Origin.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.247.17.124 (talk) 00:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: *OK I've removed them. I also removed L'12 as I can't find any info on them anywhere and they were added by User:L12Therecordmassacre which is suspicious. Markfury3000 (talk) 19:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Chromeo

message: Since someone used a weird edit-code for that link, I can't even search for the Henderson article from Allmusic on the Wayback Machine. Does anyone know how to retrieve it from the mists of time? I did a site-specific Google search and it didn't come up that way either. Any help? Softlavender (talk) 09:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Solved, fixed, found, and replaced now by Cyberbot. Softlavender (talk) 17:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [SOLVED] Source from Allmusic is dead and the URL was malformed in the edit-coding 
Talk:Edna Woolman Chase

message: :It should be noted that the above section heading "Untitled" was retrofitted by a 'bot 5 years+ after the two 2007 contribs in the section were made.--Jerzy•t 04:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: In the preceding section on this talk page may be seen the first two talk contributions that arrived. The first is vague (or dare i say silent) about in what way(s) the article is (or was) wanting. The second is vague about whether it is intended to respond to the first (as i would infer it the second were indented), or is just an independent assessment.   That said, diffident discussion is often the fate of an article that (as perhaps with this one so far) may not be getting as much editorial attention as it deserves -- or may be getting improvements that don't need much explicit interaction (beyond the per-edit summaries that may be seen via the article-history page(s): (hx stats) for piecemeal improvement to be made.--Jerzy•t 04:48, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Effective use of talk pages 
Talk:Labor federation competition in the United States

message: I had considered linking to Class consciousness from the text in the article. However, the class consciousness of the WFM and the (Western/American) Labor Union federations, in my view, were a "secularized" version of the marxist concept of class consciousness. Unfortunately, alternative interpretations-- the socialist and anarchist descriptions, for example-- of class consciousness have been purged from the class consciousness article. 
The IWW had its own informal notions of class consciousness, a philosophy which in practice has seemed much more acceptable to the U.S. working class. These notions gave a nod to Marx, but staked out a uniquely American re-interpretation, signalled by slang. For example, a proletarian became a "prole," and a plutocrat was called a "plute." The significance of these expressions is subtle, but substantial-- they basically declare that Wobblies don't accept the idea of some vanguard telling us how to talk, or what to do.
I have thought about creating a separate article describing the alternate theories of class consciousness, and linking to the existing page for the marxist version. Alternatively, fighting the marxists to make the page less sectarian is a (daunting, but perhaps preferable) possibility. In any case, i won't link to that page as it is. Feedback invited. Richard Myers 18:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: If you only linked to articles that I thought were really good, I wouldn't be making many links at all!  I would suggest adding the link and then fixing the article it points to (or vice versa).  When you update the article, be sure to explain what you're doing in the discussion tab to discourage others from using the false concept of NPOV to limit the range of historical viewpoints.RevelationDirect (talk) 00:38, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: class consciousness
Talk:Complexe Les Ailes

message: I recently attempted to find the 9eme, and it would appear that it no longer exists. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 132.206.33.68 (talk • contribs).
:I don't believe that it is open to the public at present, but it is still there.  Skeezix1000 19:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Le 9e

message: I think most will agree, this article is in need of a name change. Fundamentally this is an article which gives a historical background detailing the building that sits at 677 Saint Catherine street in Montreal. It began as the Goodwin department store and that lasted nearly 25 years. Then of course it became Montreal's flagship Eaton's department, and remained so for 75 years. It is also where the landmark Eaton's 9th floor restaurant was located, and still is today. It is no longer "Complexe Les Ailes", and having lasted only 10 years under that name destination, makes it merely a tiny (almost irrelevant) footnote in the building's history. Certainly it doesn't reflect what this article is about. Of course we need to document its full history and give details about its time as Les Ailes (that must be preserved), but it just make no sense to be the article's title at this point.
Any thoughts on what the article should be titled? "Montreal Eaton's building", "Goodwin building"? Or should it just be merged with the Montreal Eaton Centre article, as it will soon be a part of it in the near future? Just wanted to get some discussion going on this before making any changes. Any thoughts? --Apple2gs (talk) 18:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article name change needed
Talk:The Jet Set

message: Keep nothing in this article isnt correct and is theirby not a deletion article and in my opinion them representing Poland in eurovison is a BIG event worthy of recognition properly.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matrix17 (talk • contribs).
:More relevantly, according to the article the group have had three songs at the top of the Polish charts - isn't that enough to fulfill WP:MUSIC? I can't verify the information, but if true it should be enough. (I think.) (Matrix, as you must know by now, whether an article is kept or not is not about whether it is true, and not about anybody's personal opinion. It is about whether it is verifiably notable. I don't think participating in the Eurovision Song Contest qualifies as being notable, but I don't know.)
:Oh, and this is not a voting process. There are three different processes for nominating an article for deletion, and this is the "Proposed deletion" one.--Bonadea 09:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It just needs to be verified... then the tag can go.--Isotope23 18:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: 1
Talk:Free Air

message: --131.179.6.215 (talk) 02:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Details of work summary in dispute