lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Moral treatment

message: Could I query a couple of the terms used, for example, mental defectives and clients in the following sentence?
By the mid-19th century in England, the Alleged Lunatics' Friend Society was proclaiming that the new moral treatment was just a new form of repression achieved by mildness, coaxing and solitary confinement; that its emphasis on re-education meant it treated people like children or mental defectives; and that it failed to properly involve clients in decisions about their care.
Did ALFS actually use those terms? If not, are they the best translation of what they did use?81.102.15.200 (talk) 12:13, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah I think both terms could be altered. It's the author in the cited article that's discussing their views and only rarely quoting unfortunately. The former term might be better represented as "incapable" and the latter I guess just "patients" although I understood the point of at least some asylums, including the Retreat, was that they weren't hospitals as such. Btw in the other bit in the article, "meek existence" was meant to stand for what they are quoted as saying - "milk sop existence" - but didn't seem clear what the latter meant (but maybe should add the quote too). EverSince (talk) 17:11, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Language 

message: I propose someone reads the following articles, which all contain duplicate content, and include information relevant in each of them:
* Philippe Pinel#Influence
* Moral treatment#Early development
* History of psychiatry#Humanitarian reform
In particular, I think the following figures are mentioned in some, and not others, and should be considered for mention in each:
* Joseph D'Aquin
* Vincenzo Chiarugi
* William Battie
Sondra.kinsey (talk) 22:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge wikipedia histories 
Talk:Neurobiological brain disorder

message: This article needs to explain very clearly that NBD is a euphemism when applied to mental illnesses with a supposed neurobiological substrate. This is actually highly controversial. JFW | T@lk 12:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Euphemism 

message: The term neurobiological brain disorder is very rarely used in the scientific literature. When it is used, it seems to be a synonym for Mental disorder. I'll change this page to redirect to Mental disorder. This page contains only low-quality unsourced material, so there's nothing really to merge into Mental disorder. Eubulides (talk) 18:25, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Synonym for mental illness
Category talk:Political abuses of psychiatry

message: Tunesia
* Almi Adel, http://now.msn.com/amina-thrown-in-psych-ward-for-facebook-photos
China
* Jin Guanghong, http://en.minghui.org/html/articles/2011/5/15/125223.html
* Zhu Guiqin, http://www.npr.org/2013/02/22/172322275/ex-inmates-speak-out-about-labor-camps-as-china-considers-reforms
* Miss "Sueng", (german) http://www.n-tv.de/mediathek/sendungen/auslandsreport/Chinesin-will-Korruption-aufklaeren-article10302876.html
Russia 
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_Russia  
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union#Cases
Political abuse
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry
Book
* http://www.amazon.com/Schizophrenia-Is-Misdiagnosis-Implications-ICD-11/dp/1461418690/ref=sr_1_6?ie=UTF8&qid=1364114876&sr=8-6&keywords=Psychiatric+false+diagnosis
If you know a case are not listed although not on Wikipedia please write. --Richard Reinhardt (talk) 07:59, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  More cases:
Talk:Prescriptive authority for psychologists movement

message: The article says that some states already have RxP laws.  Which ones are they? Benandorsqueaks (talk) 04:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  States with RxP 

message: This should either be so renamed, or expanded greatly to include the whole world. Wikipedia is not an American-only "thing". 74.127.200.117 (talk) 16:02, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  US-Centric
Talk:Psychoeducation

message: This article is an area of interest to me and within my range of experience. I welcome collaboration and plan to share suggested updates here before posting to the page. FYI, my edits are also being reviewed by colleagues and faculty at my university, as this contribution is an element in a Wikipedia project.
I'm looking at the following journal articles:
Coker, F., Williams, A., Hayes, L., Hamann, J., & Harvey, C. (2016). Exploring the needs of diverse consumers experiencing mental illness and their families through family psychoeducation. Journal Of Mental Health, 25(3), 197-203. doi:10.3109/09638237.2015.1057323
Economou, M. P. (2015). Psychoeducation: A Multifaceted Intervention. International Journal Of Mental Health, 44(4), 259-262. doi:10.1080/00207411.2015.1076288
Levy-Frank, I., Hasson-Ohayon, I., Kravetz, S., & Roe, D. (2011). Family psychoeducation and therapeutic alliance focused interventions for parents of a daughter or son with a severe mental illness. Psychiatry Research, 189(2), 173-179. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.02.012
Lucksted, A., McFarlane, W., Downing, D., & Dixon, L. (2012). Recent Developments in Family Psychoeducation as an Evidence-Based Practice. Journal Of Marital & Family Therapy, 38(1), 101-121. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00256.x
Zygmunt, A., Olfson, M., Boyer, C. A., & Mechanic, D. (2002). Interventions to improve medication adherence in schizophrenia. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 159(10), 1653-64. Retrieved from http://libproxy.sdsu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.sdsu.edu/docview/220465027?accountid=13758
Krshein (talk) 02:30, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaboration on article revision

message: This article really needs a rewrite. Firstly, it is a very limited view on the topic - Psycho-education does not only mean education provided to people with a mental health issue, but can be used to describe education given to anyone on various psychosocial topics. 
This article makes it sound like a self-contained therapeutic approach, which it is not. 
Also, I am deleting the entire 'Controversy' section. It is entirely off-topic, very subjective and even written from the first person. It reads like a copy paste job for sure.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.74.165.67 (talk) 05:57, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I mostly agree with this summation regarding a re-write needed. Have started working on it. In the process of gathering reliable sources and developing some structure.Mrm7171 (talk) 03:15, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

text: Important article though and will be worth the effort. Empirical research has shown this a very effective and evidence based practice.Mrm7171 (talk) 03:17, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs a rewrite
Talk:Resistance (psychoanalysis)

message: This is essentially a less-fleshed out version of Psychological_resistance, no? Perhaps a merge or a redirect is in order? 47.16.221.7 (talk) 15:37, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Merge, I'd think Jacobisq (talk) 10:26, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Psycological Resistance
Talk:Royal College of Psychiatrists

message: * What I think should be changed: the new College President is Dr Adrian James
* Why it should be changed: Dr James was elected as new President in January 2020 and took office in July (replacing Professor Wendy Burn)
* References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-features/latest-news/detail/2020/01/08/dr-adrian-james-elected-next-president-of-the-royal-college-of-psychiatrists
https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-features/latest-news/detail/2020/07/01/goodbye-and-thank-you-wendy-welcome-adrian!?searchTerms=adrian%20james
Keith Bradnam (talk) 08:33, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: !   Seagull123  Φ  12:42, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Edit request

message: * What I think should be changed: the new College President is (as of 8pm on 11 July 2023) Dr Lade Smith CBE
* Why it should be changed: Dr Smith was elected as new President in January 2023 and took office at the end of the College's AGM on 11 July 2023 (replacing Dr Adrian James)
* References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/news-and-features/latest-news/detail/2023/07/12/goodbye-and-thank-you-adrian-welcome-lade!
https://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/about-us/our-people-and-how-we-make-decisions/our-smt/detail/dr-lade-smith
Keith Bradnam (talk) 10:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Conflict of interest edit request 

message: *Additional changes made:
#The use of "Dr." and "Professor" deleted per MOS:DOCTOR.
# maintenance template applied to address the article's lack of third party sourcing.
Regards,  Spintendo  10:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 12-JUL-2023
Talk:SWAP-200

message: As far as notability it has a whole chapter on it in the Psychodynamic_Diagnostic_Manual Lyo (talk) 20:18, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Evidence of notability needs to be included in the article. At the moment, it has nothing but a link to its website and publications by its authors. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:42, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

message: The article lacks inline citations and the issue has been noted since January 2017.
Furthermore, and perhaps more importantly, all of its references are quite old (1999-2012) and published before the DSM-5 (May 2013), and all of them are co-authored by the creators of the test, and might not back the reliability and validity claims in the article. I do not have domain knowledge in this area, but I believe better references (more recent and by independent authors) will greatly improve the article. Mansci (talk) 12:13, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Article needs better references
Talk:House of Wessex family tree

message: This is very good, especially in establishing Harold Godwinsson's right to the throne as representative of the senior line of descent from Ethelred I. This is still controversial in some circles (having attracted some intemperate criticism from some people in the Foundation for Medieval Genealogy) but is supported by Professor Thomas Kelley. It also shows the relationship between Edwy & Elgiva (of exactly 9 degrees of consangunity)for which the marriage was annulled by Archbishop Odo.
Unfortunately the format does not allow any expansion, of which I suggest three-
:1. Hastan (Heorstan)- son of Aethelwold (d.901)m. Cyneburga
:St. Dunstan-son of Hastan
-which shows St. Dunstan to have been the rightful king of England by primogeniture which puts a whole new perspective on his career.
:2.The Anglo Saxon Chronicle for 1009 refers to Eadric Streona's brother Brihtric and in turn to his nephew, Wulfnoth Cild- which would make Eadric Streona, not "of humble birth" as Florence/John of Worcester claim but as the son of Aethelweard the Historian, which again places his career in a different perspective, especially since Aethelweard was used as an ambassador to the Danes with St Alfheah- whom Eadric later tried to ransom, implying that Eadric's eventual treachery was against a background of acting as a go between for Danegeld. Furthermore Eadric the Wild was Streona's nephew, so he can go in. 
:3.The legend that Harold survived can be explained by the fact that when he died his wife was pregnant with a son she named Harold who Henry I met as an old man and a mon and a monk. Harold's sister founded the line of the Tsar's of Russia, so the tree did not stop in 1066, but one can see why the tree is finished there.Streona 11:01, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could we add Ælfwynn to this article? We have Æthelhelm, about whom even less is known, and Ælfwynn's presence wouldn't cause formatting problems (parents are Æthelflæd and Æthelred; briefly succeeded Æthelflæd in Mercia in 918 before being deposed by Edward the Elder). HLHJ (talk) 14:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Done, so we can all have a look.  If anyone has further views on this, feel free to add below.  Jheald (talk) 20:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Ælfwynn]]
Category talk:Suicide

message: Is there a particular reason why we don't have categories for suicides by year and by age please? Not enough to populate, or is there a consensus not to create them for another reason?Zigzig20s (talk) 08:31, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: No, something like :Category:Suicides at 31, :Category:Suicides in 1941 (for example for Earl Heikka).Zigzig20s (talk) 13:51, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

text: suicides by year are not WP:DEFINING traits: we don't categorize people by age at death, nor should we categorize by age at suicide. A category full of people with nothing more in common besides the year they took their life is of interest to an extremely small subset of readers. See WP:Overcategorization. Please do not create such trivial categories, they will be nominated for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 05:04, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Suicide by year/age
Talk:Institute of the Pennsylvania Hospital

message: There is a photo in the info box labeled "Market Street Facade". I am pretty sure that photo is taken from the 49th Street side, near the main street entrance. As the box says, lower down, the main entrance and mailing address was 111 N. 49th St. The common shorthand name for the hospital was "49th Street". --AJim (talk) 05:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Market Street Facade mislabeled  

message: Along with other environmental factors, Kirkbride et al made a big point of emphasizing ventilation, something mentioned in several contemporaneous textbooks on mental illness.  
This deserves more attention on its own merit, and it deserves more attention because people with psychiatric sequelae of environmental sensitivities are currently being invisibilized.  
One of the ways that Kirkbride buildings were later compromised was by severely restricting ventilation.
Liquidvisual (talk) 13:48, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ventilation
Talk:Therapeutic community

message: I think the term Therapeutic Community might have been coined by Tom Main in his 1946 paper "The Hospital as a therapeutic insitution" in the Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 1946 (reprinted in "The Ailment and other Psychoanalytic Essays", Free Association Books 1989, p.8) with reference to the Northfield Experiment. Any other evidence of who coined it? --Anonymaus (talk) 03:02, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  First coined? 

message: The European Federation of  Therapeutic Communities
The Center for Therapeutic Community Research
Therapeutic Community of America
Covenant House Rights of Passage Program
Daytop Village
Delancey Street Foundation
Gateway House
Phoenix House
Walden House
I ♥ ♪♫ (talk) 19:41, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Wikipedia is not a directory of organizations.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 00:32, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks for the link to what wikipedia is not. I posted the comment on the talk page to stimulate interest in expanding the article. The article is start-class and needs work; I don't have the time to do it. The top three organizations are relevant to the article but must have a reason to be included. I ♥ ♪♫ (talk) 22:20, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  How about listing TC Organizatons?
Talk:Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association

message: I am confused by what is going on here.  I am a certified psychiatric rehabilitation practitioner, far from being a doctor or anything medical Doctors would know nothing about PSR, the recovery model is unlike the medical model...there is an article on the "model wars" by Bill Kennard that you can refer to...but doctors do not understand the recovery concept nor do they understand psychiatric rehabilitation, and it is a valuable article.  Authorities do recognize it as legitimate and important see Boston University, University of Illionois, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (the only place where you hear medicine connected to PSR and there they call it PsyR)--Recovery Psychology (talk) 05:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rehabilitation is not Medical
Talk:Richard Girling

message: Sorry this is my first article - should this be a stub? I've definately not taken anything from the site referred to by the search bot.  I think the similarities may be due to the shortness of the article & the fact Girling hasn't done a great variety of work.—Preceding unsigned comment added by SteveKCole (talk • contribs) 
:I believe you. But remember to sign your posts to the talk page! --Alvestrand 18:01, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:2q37 deletion syndrome

message: Hello.
I am a member of WikiProject Medicine, a Wikipedia wide project that maintains and improves articles that fall under the scope of medicine. Since your article is already under has our tag, I have now reassessed it to make sure if is in the right WikiProject. Upon reassessment of the article, I'd like to make a few points, as shown below:
*Assess article with class and importance factors
*Added genetics task force
*
Leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. I'm glad this article could fall within our scope, and I hope to see it grow large! Many thanks! Renaissancee (talk) 17:05, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Article Reassessment for [[WP:MED|WikiProject Medicine]]
Category talk:Adolescence

message: Adolescence is so much broader than "Pediatrics" (think: Boy bands!).   For that reason, I removed pediatrics as a parent category from this category.  Specific medical conditions/categories falling under "Adolescence" might be individually categorized into "Pediatrics".OsamaK (talk) 20:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removing pediatrics
Talk:Indefinite leave to remain

message: "ILR may be lost if a person leaves the United Kingdom and on return is given leave to enter other than for an indefinite period.[citation needed] This may be because, e.g., they mistakenly seek to enter as a visitor, or the immigration officer believes that they do not intend to reside in the United Kingdom.[citation needed]"
Quite frankly, this is rubbish. An entry stamp cannot revoke ILR. Curtailment of any existing leave must be approved by either a CIO or a HMI. --Nozzer71 (talk) 11:48, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loss of ILR 
Talk:Rachel and Leah

message: (cur | prev) 20:37, 6 December 2014‎ Gorobay (talk | contribs)‎ m . . (1,763 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Gorobay moved page Rachel and Leah (Women of Genesis series) to Rachel and Leah: unnecessary disambiguation) (undo | thank)
:Moved back In ictu oculi (talk) 08:03, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: Why?  There's no other article with this title, so disambiguation is completely unnecessary, and Rachel and Leah was a redirect anyway, with no hatnote.  I've moved it back as a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.  I see no other candidate.  In any case, even if there was a need to disambiguate, it is incorrect, per WP:BOOKDAB disambiguation should be "(novel)".  --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:08, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Need for disambiguation
Talk:Unit Control Block

message: The phrase "16-bit Q-type (i.e. relocatable) addresses" is doubly wrong; first, the I/O device lookup table did not have Q-type address constants and, second, Q is used for offsets within an external dummy. Perhaps the editor meant Y-type, which is a 15-bit relocatable constant.
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 17:45, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Q-type address constants? 

message: Priority queuing of I/O did not come in with the Workload Manager (WLM); in fact, priority queuing of I/O existed in OS/360 Release 15/16
 and ordered queuing existed by Release 21.
 Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 19:46, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Priority queueing 

message: Operating systems running in z/Architecture mode do not queue I/O by channel, nor do systems running in XA or ESA mode, only systems that run in S/370 or ECPS:VSE mode and use the SIO instruction. All newer systems use the SSCH instruction and the channel subsystem handles the assignment and queuing of channels. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 20:14, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queuing by channel only applies to S/370 and ECPS:VSE modes 

message: Is the Network and Systems Professionals Association (NASPA) NaSPA Technical Support Magazine considered to be a WP:RS? I'm thinking in particular of Keeping up With the Unit Control Block: Part II by Sam Golob. Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 14:18, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Secondary sources?
Talk:Greek submarine Delfin (1912)

message: An English-language source I consulted corroborates most of this but gives a different date for the torpedo attack:
:"The Greeks also had the war's only submarine, the French-built Delfin, which became the first undersea boat to fire a self-propelled torpedo in action. In the attack, on 22 December 1912, the Delfin targeted the Ottoman cruiser Mecidiye from a distance of 800 meters, but the torpedo missed the mark."
From:  In any case might be worth adding as an English-language source to corroborate the "first torpedo" claim. --Delirium 06:05, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The different date results from the discrepancy of the Gregorian and Julian calendars. Greece used the Julian system until 1922, so there is a difference of 13 days. I am however including the reference. Thanks! Cplakidas 18:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  date 

message: As you can probably see, I moved this - do let me know if anything went awry. No more bongos 06:16, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I moved it back.  Well done for being bold, and please continue to be so in the future, but in this case, as per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (ships), the article was correctly titled in the first place. Kind regards, Benea 13:46, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Replied on my talk page - oops. No more bongos 16:42, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Moved 

message: I'm translating the page for it. wiki... 85 knots sumberged is correct? --Zerosei (talk) 10:10, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: No, obviously not. Someone mistyped, it should be 8.5. Good catch! Constantine   ✍  10:29, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Knots
Talk:Functional murmur

message: The present version of the article doesn't mention the relevance of the word paediatric except in the title itself. Is this really something relevant for children or not? If yes, what typical ages? IMHO this is rather critical info missing from the article. Boud (talk) 21:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  doesn't 'paediatric' mean something important? 

message: the table is confusing. it's titled 'benign' paediatric murmurs, then gives differentials for things that aren't that benign.Toyokuni3 (talk) 22:37, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Table
Talk:Child life specialist

message: The changes in the field section does not have any references to back up what "child friendly language" is.  This section seems persuasive out of placeAmyR7 (talk) 00:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled