lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Canadian Army Command and Staff College

message: I will research notability when I return this afternoon. Navou 12:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Information to be updated: 
“Courses delivered by the Canadian Army Command and Staff College include:
* Army Junior Staff Officer Qualification
* Army Operations Course
* Unit Command Team Course
* Tactical Information Management Officer Course
* Joint Tactical Targeting Course
* Target Engagement Authority
* Basic and Advanced Collateral Damage Estimation (provided on behalf of the Canadian Forces Warfare Center)
”
Explanation of issue: Updated course list
References supporting change: http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/training-establishments/command-staffcollege-index.page
Information to be removed: Colonel D.D. Basinger, CD
Information to be added: Colonel D.J. Cross, CD
Explanation of issue: Change of Commandant
References supporting change: http://www.forces.gc.ca/en/training-establishments/command-staffcollege-index.page 
-Derek at CAF (talk) 19:52, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Some proposed changes

message: #  The commandant was updated.
#  The list of courses was not added, per WP:NOTACATALOG.
# The One source maintenance template was appended to the article.
Regards,  Spintendo  21:23, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: Reply 24-JAN-2019
Talk:1973 Australian incomes referendum

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved to X.. Consensus on the alternate proposed titles: 1973 Australian incomes referendum, 1973 Australian price control referendum, 1906 Australian senate elections referendum and 1928 Australian state debts referendum  – robertsky (talk) 14:58, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Support all - I don't see a need for the capitalisation, seems unnecessary. I'd prefer to see 1973 Australian referendum (Prices) moved to 1973 Australian referendum on price control, since "prices" is a little vague, though I'm satisfied with the proposed title. Not sure why the 1906 and 1928 referenda were moved initially. Bandit Heeler (talk) 05:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Support per WP:Disambiguation GMH Melbourne (talk) 13:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

text: Relisting comment: looking for any further comment on controls vs control or Senate vs senate Bensci54 (talk) 17:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 1 April 2024
Talk:2013 Games of the Small States of Europe

message: * No reason given by nominator why this should be merged?! Nominator has obviously not read WP:MM. (After proposing the merger, place your reasons on the talk page...) Anyway, this should remain an independent article just like London 2012 is, as it is bound to grow as more info gets published. StephP 12:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

message: Could someone please upload the logos of the Games? As on the lb:Spiller vun de klenge Länner 2013. Thank you in advance. →213.194.42.100 (talk) 08:35, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Logo
Talk:2015 Games of the Small States of Europe

message: * No reason given by nominator why this should be merged?! Nominator has obviously not read WP:MM. (After proposing the merger, place your reasons on the talk page...) Anyway, this should remain an independent article just like London 2012 is, as it is bound to grow as more info gets published. StephP 12:45, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge?!
Talk:Behrooz

message: .
Behrooz Shahsavari (born in 1988) is an Iranian student of mechanical engineering at 
Sharif University of Technology
</br>
Golden Medal winner of the 5th Moscow international salon of innovations and investments. (2005)
</br>
Golden Medal winner of the 5th National Khawrazmi Festival in Iran for the invention linear motor specially designed for Maglevs. (2003)
Thaurisil 12:52, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Behrooz Shahsavari

message: As far as I can tell, this is a different spelling of the same name. I think they should be merged. Can anyone familiar with Persian names help?Lex Kitten 12:24, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Proposed merge
Talk:U.S. Route 40 in Maryland

message: I like the format that was chosen for noting the long multiplexes in the junction list, but I think the Intersection column should include notes about towns/cities/municipalities that can be reached by following the route intersected, as this is already done in all the other articles in the Roads in Maryland WikiProject.
Also, why were some of the Interstate highway intersections deleted from the infobox? -TheOneKEA (20070615 20:09)
:I think, if we do this, we need to decide what towns to include.
:I chose junctions that "define" the major cities. For instance, US 1 is the closest major intersection to the center of Baltimore; the I-695, I-95, and I-895 junctions are out in the outer parts of the city or suburbs. It's easy enough to use the junction list to find all junctions with Interstates. --NE2 04:13, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Queries 

message: A 1943 topo shows a bypass on Dogwood Road (!):  --NE2 12:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other notes
Talk:Gangrel (disambiguation)

message: There was a 20th century British magazine named Gangrel, if I'm not mistaken. Drutt 13:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Consider Her Ways

message: The elephant in the room about this story, which would occur to most readers nowadays, is that if we grant many of the assumptions here then wouldn't a lot of the women turn to lesbianism? PatGallacher (talk) 10:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This is an odd aspect of the story. What women are to do with their erotic needs is not addressed in the story (or at least, I did not notice it upon first reading.) Perhaps this is because it was written by a heterosexual male who did not see lesbians as a section of society worth acknowledging, or exploring.Codenamemary (talk) 22:33, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

message: This is a tricky plot to sum up, and someone(s) did a careful job recounting the story for this article. I have added some character names to avoid the awkwardness of repeating "the protagonist" / "the historian" etc., as well as a few other things. Just wanted to commend who ever created and worked on this synopsis in the first place. Codenamemary (talk) 19:26, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Thanks to Whoever created the synopsis for this story
Talk:List of American films of 1973

message: Our article states very clearly that this is a Brittish film, and should hence not be on this list. Boeing720 (talk) 02:04, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I completely agree, and I shall remove it if no-one else does. MinorProphet (talk) 23:28, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Live and Let Die - American ?
Talk:A35 road

message: Sorry, but the improvements section was wrong, as it stands. Re-read the HA page you linked to, the only improvements in the DFBO contract is for upgrading the A30 Honiton-Exeter and the Puddletown Bypass. Both have already been done. The rest of the contract is for taking over the maintenance of the existing road, as it stands. The contract runs until September 2026. All that happens on that date is the road ownership passes back to the Highways Agency; ie that date is not a date for completion of any works.
The only confirmed improvements along this stretch are the conversion of the concrete surfaces on the new dual carriageway sections to asphalt for noise reasons. There is also some talk about minor fiddling; road marking changes to make junctions safer, speed limit changes, and maybe some minor and completely on-line changes around some of the more dangerous junctions to improve lines of sight. There are certainly no plans for improving the route by building sections of road on new off-line alignments.
Hence, I removed the improvements section. If you can find a way to re-write it whilst remaining factual, feel free. I tried, and apart from mentioning minor, mostly insignificant improvements that may, or may not actually happen, all I could mention was improvements that have already occured - in which case why stop at the Puddletown bypass? Why not make mention of the Dorchester bypass, the Bridport bypass, the Axminster bypass, the numerous changes to the route around Lyme Regis, and so on. Maybe have a History section instead?
I'd suggest if you want a bit more background into the future of this road you consult the A35/A31/A30 (Southampton to Exeter) Route Management Study. It's currently here: http://www.highways.gov.uk/roads/projects/6238.aspx, but the HA tends to move things about a lot. JamesD 13:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Improvements section 

message: Hello. I would like to let you know that I have reduced the amount of major junctions on this page from 26 to 11. I moved the terminus junctions into the termini area of the infobox to try to reduce the amount of major junctions and get it under the required limit. However, the amount of major junctions in the infobox is eleven, so if you could reduce the amount of major junctions on this page then please do. My suggestion would be to maybe remove the A3049. If not then I will do it in new year. Thank you. Roads4117 (talk) 08:46, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major junctions
Talk:Ślęża

message: Etymology of name Ślęża may have also different root than Silingi people living there. It may come from word "śląg" or "ślęg" meaning swamp in old polish. As this is mountain is separated form others it has vast amount of rainfall. This, and geological structure causes the mountain to be very wet, with lots of small streams, and springs. So there is a group of researchers saying that the name is coming from this swampy nature of mountain
83.27.5.11 13:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:Taiwanese elections

message: The Republic of China local elections, 2014 is now over can an admin de-italics 2014 on the local elections. Thank you — [[User: ASDFGH|ASDFGH =] ]] talk? 20:25, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Number 57 22:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Protected edit request on 3 December 2014
Talk:Timeline of the Iraq War

message: What are people's thoughts on merging this timeline with all the 2007 in Iraq, 2006 in Iraq, etc pages? Publicus 13:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

message: I think I had read a thing by Seymour Hersh about how the USAF is still flying over Iraq? Is this ongoing, or concluded?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.88.201.22 (talk) 19:52, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  US/Coalition Airpower operations continuing in Iraq? 
Talk:Alesis Quadrasynth

message: Could someone please explain why my self-written article on Alesis Quadrasynth keeps getting deleted. They state the reason is "blatant advertising". But there is no advertising in the article. It only describes the synthesizer, its functions, and sound characteristics. Please explain what in my article qualifies as "blatant advertising".  Please explain before deleting the article. Thank you.
:The tone of the article set off a lot of people's spam radar. I've looked it over more thoroughly and I think the article may be fine, but still needs some rewriting. However, I am not familiar with the product and as such I have doubts about its notability, which is generally required for an article on a product. In particular, the article should assert notability and have reliable sources to back it up. Please note that notability is not necessarily "popularity" or even "fame". If it has been the subject of independent secondary sources (like a non-advertising review of the product in a major publication of the field), then it should be notable. Further, if it has won any awards or gained public attention in the media somehow, that will also generally establish notability. At least one line should be in the article to "assert" notability. I have done a bit of rewriting (needs more) and tagged it as unreferenced (per WP:RS) and for proposed deletion for no notability assertion and lack of encyclopedic tone. PROD gives you 5 days to improve the article. Since this has been speedily deleted twice, please do not just remove the PROD without addressing the concerns as this will likely have the article end up in Articles for Deletion. Thanks. Cquan (after the beep...) 17:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: I added an external link to a very informative website about synthesisers. I think it should be sufficient to demonstrate the notability of the Qudrasynth series to those who are lacking knowledge about keyboards and synthesisers in general.Godfinger (talk) 13:15, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: External Links
Talk:John Turner Sargent Sr.

message: When there's enough info for dual articles, I'll split it; until then, a single article will suffice. ∞ΣɛÞ² (τ|c) 13:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: split
Talk:Croix de guerre 1914–1918 (France)

message: The article should make clear what the difference between the levels mean:
    * Bronze star (étoile en bronze): for those who were mentioned at the regiment or brigade level.[2]
    * Silver star (étoile en argent): for those who were mentioned at the division level.[2]
    * Silver gilt star (étoile en vermeil): for those who were mentioned at the corps level.[2]
    * Bronze palm (palme en bronze): for those who were mentioned at the army level.[2]
    * Silver palm (palme en argent): represents five bronze mentions.[2]
Does it signify the rank of the last commander to sign the papers before publication?
WikiParker (talk) 21:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: It signifies how high up the chain of command the citation went depending on the degree of courage/danger involved in the meritorious act.  Fdutil (talk) 18:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Levels 

message: My Grandfather (Serving in the AEF 32nd Divsion in France in 1918) received the Croix de Guerre after the Aisne-Marne Campaign.  His portrait in 1920 shows him wearing the medal.    However I have a certificate from the Republic of France for his award that is dated 1925.     Is there some other certificate issued at the time the medal is awarded, rather than after the war is over?   It would be nice to show a sample of such.   --71.82.64.203 (talk) 00:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I've read every single decree and order on this award, no official certificate was issued, but most units produced their own which can be quite beautiful and are highly collectible.  Fdutil (talk) 18:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Attestation or Certificate 

message: Shouldn't there be a link from this page to the CATEGORY page listing many recipients of the Croix de Guerre, "Category:Recipients of the Croix de guerre 1914–1918 (France)"?
Dickvb4 (talk) 20:15, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why no link to list of recipients? 

message: Errr... under the section "Notable foreign recipients" there are two men who are so un-notable that their redlinked entries here are their only appearance on en.wikipedia. I would therefore propose to delete them from the list. Thoughts, anyone, please? Thanks. CharlesSpencer (talk) 11:08, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notable foreign recipients
Talk:Rubber boa

message: So as what is this thing really (or most commonly) known? "Rubber boa" or "Coastal rubber boa"? The introduction should agree with the article title for obvious reasons, the most important being avoiding reader confusion. PaladinWhite 13:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "Rubber boa" or "Coastal rubber boa"?

message: I was wondering how it got its rubber skin, or has that not been discovered yet?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.64.47.19 (talk) 18:05, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How does it get its rubbery skin?
Talk:List of American films of 1995

message: Which film does The Journey (film) refer to? Until today, that link led to an Iranian film. There are also US films by that name, but I haven't found any in 1995. And then there's, according to the IMDB, an Australian short film by that name from 1995. In short, a reference for the US film would be great, else I'd rather delete the entry because we could only link to The Journey, which doesn't mention anything about a 1995 US film. --Ibn Battuta (talk) 05:15, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Film "The Journey"
Talk:Cloud County Health Center

message: This article could use a photo of the facility.  Anyone?--Paul McDonald 15:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photos 

message: Someone removed the section about the current ownership of the hospital being Salina Regional.  I put it back in because all information points to this being true.--Paul McDonald 14:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ownerhip/Salina regional... 
Category talk:Jerusalem

message: I removed :Category:Cities in Judea and :Category:Cities in Israel. Since Humus sapiens removed :Category:Cities in the West Bank. Parts of Jerusalem are in the West Bank and parts are in Israel. So for WP:NPOV fairness either all the categories remain, or all are removed. --Timeshifter 12:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Cities in the West Bank]] 

message: I thought it was time that the adults were brought in. The status of Jerusalem is quite blatantly disputed and listing it under Judea, Israel, Asian capitals etc but not under West Bank or disputed cities is quite clearly not NPOV. --Peter cohen 22:39, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks. I commented there. I suggest people read Positions on Jerusalem. --Timeshifter 07:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

text: The WP:ANI discussion is now archived here: . It lists many examples of this still-ongoing POV campaign. --Timeshifter 18:01, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive818#Edit warring and POV pushing Category:Jerusalem]] 

message: This is really bizarre. Tewfik recently removed :Category:Jerusalem and List of East Jerusalem locations from :Category:Jerusalem Governorate. Please see these diffs  .
Jerusalem is not part of the Jerusalem Governorate???--Timeshifter 12:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[:Category:Jerusalem Governorate]]
Talk:1937 Australian referendum (Aviation)

message: has added infobox referendum to all Australian referendums. Unfortunately referendums to amend the Australian constitution require a double majority - a majority of voters nationally AND a majority in 4 of the 6 states. This referendumThe 1937 Australian referendum (Aviation) referendun was one of 5 referendums that received a majority of votes but failed to achieve that in the majority of states, the others being 1946 Australian referendum (Marketing),  1946 Australian referendum (Industrial Employment), 1977 Australian referendum (Simultaneous Elections) and 1984 Australian referendum (Terms of Senators). The infobox at the moment misleadingly shows the referendum as being approved. Are you able to rectify this? If not the infobox is unsuitable for use on Australian constitutional referendums & will need to be removed.  -- Find bruce (talk) 23:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Find bruce has a point. The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

text: I have removd the tables from the infobox. Durian Farmer (talk) 22:41, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Infobox
Talk:1919 Australian referendum (Monopolies)

message: I have made this page more in line with the other page of monopolies referendum, however i have been lazy and just added the first amendment as it was originally written, so no alterations for the alterations proposed by MR Tuder and the Senate (I don't know what got changed by the amendments if it was changed at all, in addition to the latter half of the proposal. Plus i have little to no idea where to find the question proposed to the Australian Public. My best guess is legislation.com.au where the 1913 monopolies referendum editors got their question. I have found the labor intensive way (someone's going to hate me) for finding teh referendum at https://www.legislation.gov.au/content/HistoricGazettes1919 . its between october the 9th to 31st of december.
Another thing to note is this amendment seems to be time gated to 3 years after the assent of the change in the constitution.
My sincere Thanks to Editors fixing/cleaning up my editing mishaps. (IronBattalion (talk) 08:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  My Incomplete edits
Talk:1906 Australian senate elections referendum

message: Is there a reason why the amendments to the US & Ireland constitutions are listed in the see also section? While they concern voting for the upper house, they don't seem particularly relevant to me in terms of content, reasons etc. Find bruce (talk) 22:18, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: In the absence of any contrary view, I have deleted the link to the amendments to the US & Ireland constitutions Find bruce (talk) 20:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: See also

message: I renamed the article "Australian referendum, 1906 (Senate elections)" to reflect the naming convention used in most other Australian referendum articles Find bruce (talk) 20:45, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: Renamed article
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/BasicLinux

message: This is still a viable minidistribution for 486 class computers.  There is an active website
(http://basiclinux.com.ru/) and version 3.50 was released May 31, 2007 with a changelog as
follows:
3.50
------------------------------
window manager upgraded to jwm
sed upgraded to full version
major improvements to calctool
major improvements to links
smaller busybox (same version)
smaller less (older version)
ADDED: /dev/random 
DELETED: sedleds, xev, getopt
-----------------------------
Epass 14:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Deportivo Miranda F.C.

message: The last attack of the dictator Chavez of Venezuela against the Italians was made in the Venezuelan football. The dictator, who wants to even change the name "Venezuela" because comes from Venice and not from an indian name, wants to erase all evidences of the Italians in the country he has ruled for over ten years. Chavez, himself a mestizo who hates europeans, cannot allow that a team can have an Italian name in the first division of football in his homeland. So, he ordered to change - AGAINST THE WILL OF THE MAJORITY OF THE LEGITIMATE OWNERS AND AGAINST WHAT IS WRITTEN IN THE RULES OF THE "DEPORTIVO ITALIA" - the name of the Italian team in that of a suburb of Caracas, called "Petare". Now suddenly the  Deportivo Italia (and in a typical dictatorial way) is called "Deportivo Petare"! Please read (using google translator) what the newspaper of the Italians in Caracas wrote about: .--93Mutina (talk) 05:29, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  The dictator Chavez also nationalized the "Deportivo Italia"