Talk:RIA Novosti

message: or is the agency unreachable on the Web from NATO countries since this little "armed conflict in the Caucasus" really got underway? Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 13:57, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Is it just me,

message: If RIA Novosti traces it history through Soviet era, it was a part of the Soviet propaganda machine, and should be seealsoed.  Easy as an apple pie. ΔιγουρενΕμπρος! 13:04, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Integrated the link to text to make the (presumed) connection clear. Offliner (talk) 13:29, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eastern bloc 

message: Their official English language Web site lists them as "The Russian News & Information Agency RIA Novosti":  This seems authoritative enough, so I am adding the "The" and the "& News" part to the intro line. 74.72.103.79 (talk) 03:07, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, I can see why you would think that, but it seems that all the other pages on the RIA website refer simply to "RIA Novosti." The page you referred to simply explains in the headline what RIA Novosti is; that is, "The [only] Russian news & information agency." Unfortunately, the headline used a kaps-and-lower-case style so it looks like the cited phrase is part of the name instead of a phrase explaining just what RIA Novosti actually is. I'm taking the liberty of changing the article back in the belief that it should be that way. Your friend, GeorgeLouis (talk) 01:19, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Official name 

message: http://pda.rian.ru/
http://m.rian.ru/
WhisperToMe (talk) 05:26, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: PDA and mobile sites

message: Archived versions of RIA Novosti's reports on its own liquidation:
* Head of New Kremlin Media Agency Bids to Boost Russia's Image
* RIA Novosti to Be Liquidated in State-Owned Media Overhaul
We never know when everything's gonna be taken down and should go and archive all ria.ru references. Would be great if there was a bot doing that for us... --PanchoS (talk) 07:44, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Last days of RIA Novosti - let's save what we're using 

message: The transcription of "Федеральное государственное унитарное предприятие Российское агентство международной информации «РИА Новости»", is rather ..." Federal'noye Gosudarstvennoye Unitarnoye Predpryatye Rossiyskoye Agentsvo Mezhdunarodnoy Informatsii", I think.178.26.108.15 (talk) 16:19, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  mistake in transcription 

message: This entire article is written in the past tense, yet using the English link at the bottom, I get redirected to http://en.ria.ru/ which appears to still be getting updated with news stories and bears the name "RIA Novosti" at the top. Are they still operating and the article's just out of date? – RobinHood70 talk 18:54, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: RobinHood70 is correct. The subject news service is still operating. It did not stop operating. --Dervorguilla (talk) 04:39, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

text: But it's still operating under the name RIA Novosti.--82.35.251.109 (talk) 15:58, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Well http://en.ria.ru/ now redirects to Sputnik International (http://sputniknews.com) so I think it is safe to say RIA is no longer operating in any sense. Alex McKee (talk) 11:46, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
replies: text:  Russian language RIA Novosti [ria.ru] appears to be operating seperately, do not know why en.ria.ru redirects there. FlalfTalk 20:24, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Still operating? 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on RIA Novosti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130928023413/http://rianovosti.com/docs/about/novosti.html to http://www.rianovosti.com/docs/about/novosti.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on RIA Novosti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130928023413/http://rianovosti.com/docs/about/novosti.html to http://www.rianovosti.com/docs/about/novosti.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on RIA Novosti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060913092839/http://rusnews.cn/ to http://www.rusnews.cn/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:44, 8 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I haven't found much coverage and I don't know what to say except it is very apparent from their website [ria.ru] that they are obviously not defunct as they are still publishing articles. This article needs to be updated, will be tagging it with that as well. FlalfTalk 20:11, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  RIA Novosti has been operating 6 years after it became 'defunct' 

message: Just announced schools open in Mariupol and Russian Anthem is played in lessons.  Whilst Russia still bomb the city.
https://twitter.com/ukraine_world/status/1516509532549173250?s=20&t=YuOf4gbS27FEhiyJq6V7jg
Direct source would be needed but I can't find it. HuttonIT (talk) 20:39, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Another propaganda clanger. 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:37, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion