lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Rumble in the Morning

message: For the record, that bit about 610 AM being more popular was part of an election gag on Tommy & rumble. The station is an automated traffic report. That was the joke. --From Andoria with Love 18:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

message: Can someone please explain what's going on with the second half of the article? I'm utterly confused... - Akamad 12:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems like vandalism. So I'm deleting it. - Akamad 12:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The folks at Tommy & Rumble (actually just Tommy today – Rumble's on vacation) were discussing the edit that was made to Chris Benoit's article stating that Benoit's wife was dead, 14 hours before their bodies were discovered. Tommy then stated that he was dead (and black) and that Tommy & Rumble listeners should update their Wikipedia page as such. After it was reverted the first time, Tommy declared that the Tommy & Rumble page was officially "under attack", calling for listeners to add various death notices to the page. They were actually reading it on the air. It was pretty funny, but I think it's pretty much died down now (I know I'm done, lol). --From Andoria with Love 13:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Aah, I see. - Akamad 13:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: They have brough wp up on air and encouraged listeners to make ill advised changes to pages before.  While kind of funny on the air, it is funnier to hear the confusion when there changes dissapear.  If it continue, short term protection is probably the best idea. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  All the deaths 

message: While i am a fan of T&R, I cannot condone abuse of this project.  As funny as it may be, it is not appropriate for this project and like any other article out there which I protect from vandalism, I have protected this article from editing.  If you would like to request a valid change be made to this page, please contact me on my user talk page.  -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Deaths of Tommy 

message: Tommy & Rumble was named number one morning show in Virginia last week or so. If anyone has any internet sources (I can't find any), then please add it to the site as citation for the show's popularity. --From Andoria with Love (talk) 13:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number one
Talk:George Washington and slavery

message: A tag has been placed atop this article saying the lead may be too long.  However, it’s about the same length as it was when promoted to featured article on April 20, 2020.  The length of the lead was considered during that FAC process and found to be okay. It was 650 words then, and 840 words now. I will cut it back some. Anythingyouwant (talk) 08:05, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I just cut the lead back to 786 words, and will remove the tag. Anythingyouwant (talk) 21:18, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Length of Lead
Talk:The Atomic Bitchwax

message: Under "current Lineup" (and the infobox) the article linked to a band called "Kcor", which is not the band "Core" with whom Finn Ryan played. As far as I can tell, "Core" does not have a wikipedia entry. If I have overlooked it, or someone makes one in the future, it should be linked. For now I have removed the links, as it was very confusing.--68.42.85.192 (talk) 08:58, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Core 

message: I saw "pop" as a genre classification, I will remove it because of two reasons
1 Pop is to broad a term for usage, especially since more specific terms can be applied here.
2 No discussion of why it should be classified as pop.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.104.37.107 (talk) 14:51, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  genre 
Talk:Gan Eng Seng

message: As per Wikipedia policy on Verifiability, all statements and facts must be backed up by adequate citations and references. Without exception, this rule is applicable should anyone include new addition of known descendants of Gan Eng Seng on the article itself. If its sources are not cited, such entries will be duly removed to protect the integrity of the article. -- Aldwinteo 15:28, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Note on addition of known descendants of Gan Eng Seng 
Talk:Philip S. Khoury

message: Full professors at major research universities who have published books are certainly notable. 
Art. just needs some refs.DGG 19:03, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Not necessarily according to Wikipedia:Notability (academics). I'll give it some time for proof of notability and the references to be brought, otherwise it may have to survive an AfD. -- Avi 19:18, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Notability

message: User:Khoury created this article about Philip S. Khoury, and later added unsourced claims about his achievements in fundraising, maintaining academic excellence and starting new programs at his institution.  Source tags were added two years ago, and Khoury was also warned about conflict of interest on User talk:Khoury. Instead of ever providing the missing sources for these claims, User:Khoury has now gone and just deleted the unsourced claim tags, with no comment explaining this action. 
I have reinstalled them. They should now either get replaced by sourced information, or the claims should be removed entirely from the article, I think.  Khoury has also added Philip S. Khoury to "notable alumni" lists at the articles on his high school and his university. I've left these alone for now. Most of User:Khoury's edits are about unsourced achievements of Philip S. Khoury. If User:Khoury and Philip S. Khoury are the same person, he should read and follow the Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest policy, and especially Wikipedia:Autobiography.
151.203.119.5 (talk) 17:36, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Unsourced & posible conflict of interest editing
Talk:Annihilation: Conquest

message: Shouldn't it be Annihilation: Conquest (currently a redirect to Annihilation (comics))? That seems to be the name on the books themselves, to judge by the solicitations. --Mrph 18:00, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title

message: Um, it mentions something about Xemnu and events regarding Quasar and Adam Warlock...but those events haven't happened yet...have they?  Shouldn't we take that out until the actual issue is released?  Unless there's pages in Quasar number 4 that I didn't get, that stuff wasn't in there.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by DNMN (talk • contribs) 05:34, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: End of the article

message: Jeez, man. Put some warning in there. Just because some of us know doesn't mean everyone else does, or more importantly, wants to know.
--Crimsondude 19:06, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Encyclopedias dont not restrict content just because people don't know. That is actually counter-productive, encyclopedias are unbiased sources of information. Rau J16 20:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spoiler Tag?
Talk:Domino tiling

message: Does anyone know how  is supposed to work? I used it in the EL section, but it's not what I expected. -- Mikeblas 17:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  OEIS template? 

message: It strikes me that this paragraph:
More generally, the number of ways to cover a  2n -by- 2n  square with  2n^2  dominoes (as calculated independently by Temperley and M.E. Fisher and Kasteleyn in 1961) is given by
: \prod_{j=1}^N \prod_{k=1}^N \left ( 4\cos^2 \frac{\pi j}{2n + 1} + 4\cos^2 \frac{\pi k}{2n + 1} \right )  
The calculation of the number of possible ways of tiling a standard chessboard with 32 dominoes is a simple, commonly used, example of a problem which may be solved through the use of the Pfaffian technique. This technique may be applied in many mathematics-related subjects, for example, in the classical, 2-dimensional computation of the dimer-dimer correlator function in quantum mechanics.
really belongs in another article.  That is, this is not information about the number 12988816; it is information about an application of the Pfaffian technique.  Unless someone strongly objects (a reasoned objection), I plan to remove the paragraph here and merge it into the Pfaffian article.  Lunch 21:48, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Result for an n-by-n checkerboard

message: I'm removing the reference
*.
Robin Chapman was kind enough to email me the document in question. It is a single-paragraph letter to the editor, in response to a previous article by George Jellis examining recurrence formuale for tilings of rectangles of width up to four. The letter points out that the problem of counting domino tilings of rectangles had already been completely solved by Kasteleyn and repeats Kasteleyn's formula. So it's not an actual paper and it doesn't really add anything to the material we alreeady cite from other sources. —David Eppstein (talk) 15:23, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Chapman reference
Talk:Felix Timmermans

message: The pages alludes about collaboration. Timmermans had already had the same problem in the 1st world war. About the 2nd world war, the page considers this as "wrongly" and suggest that Timmermans, by his death, was a victim of an unfounded accusation. All this comes without a single reference. (Indeed the whole page lacks references, except for the Nobel Prize.) I have no opinion on that matter, but think collaboration to serious to be treated so lightly in Wikipedia. Instead of the personal opinion of Eugene van der Pijll in 2005, the page should give references to historians. --Dominique Meeùs (talk) 21:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Collaboration
Talk:Feodor Stepanovich Rojankovsky

message: Two sources cited by LCCN (see footer link) 
* found: Chernyĭ, S. Zhivai͡a azbuka, 1926: t.p. (F. Rozhankovskīĭ)
* found: Daniel Boone ... 1931.
The first may be a book published 1926 (in Russian language in Paris?), written by S. Chernyĭ and illustrated by F. Rozhankovskīĭ. The second may be an early Eng-language publication illus. by Rojankovsky, perhaps the earliest known to the US national library.
P.S. Note that Illustrators of childrens books, 1957-1966 (1968) gives birth date 1891-12-21. --P64 (talk) 23:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Daniel Boone (1931) in the Library of Congress online catalog is a French-language book. --P64 (talk) 20:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Early career 
Talk:Ferenc Herczeg

message: The undocumented  remark about the deportation of the old writer into a Gulag that had been entered both here and in the   Hungarian article by the same editor 213.178.109.159 on 25 Sept. 2009
has   at last been removed from the Hungarian article. Consequently, I have  removed the very doubtful remark from the English article as well.--Marschner (talk) 17:45, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Gulag?
Talk:Fernande de Cartier de Marchienne

message: This person is only the mother of a major French novel writer, mentioning her in her daughter's article is legitimate, but I don't understand the purpose of this article (which doesn't exist in the Francophone wikipedia) nor its stub status: what more could be said about her ? The source of the article is a page from a genealogical website, and there seem to be no more to say about it - and her. --Pylambert 07:59, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why the stub status ? Why this article ?
Talk:Nerodia clarkii

message: A better photo would be appreciated. Photos of Nerodia spp. all ought to show the snakes' bellies, if possible, as this is the major way of differentiating them. This photo does serve to show how well these snakes blend into their natural surroundings, however.  Chris77xyz 19:13, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed, not sure where to any that show the snake's belly, though I have looked. Alexcs114 (talk) 15:10, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

text: Better photographs are always appreciated, but not always available. The recommendation about what a better photograph should show is potentially useful, and worth considering if a choice of photos becomes available, · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 07:54, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Filipp Makharadze

message: Makharadze seems to have died of natural causes. See https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=cnGQl1fWE-wC&pg=PA6&lpg=PA6&dq=Filipp+makharadze+death&source=bl&ots=awTbxIZxv5&sig=ACfU3U1nAvCXtUiyt4L-lWT4XltddWNMYQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjBnbPq3IbrAhU_UhUIHcXlCmUQ6AEwGHoECBIQAQ#v=onepage&q=Filipp%20makharadze%20death&f=false  .  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C4:7C87:4F00:302A:3D55:E63D:5807 (talk) 13:57, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cause
Talk:Clyst St Mary

message: I've tidied this poor entry up, certain parts have had to be removed or changed.
For example as a Civil Parish no way is CSM a hamlet, or a suburb of Exeter.
I've updated the population to the 2004 mid year estimates
--C Hawke 19:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

message: With Friends Provident employing hundreds of staff, along with the regional DEFRA site on the outskirts of Clyst St. Mary this seems a little unbelievable unless the village boundary does not include Winslade Park.  
I think notable is a bit strong, I have lived within 5 miles of here most of my life and I have only heard of one of the companies listed.JamesFitz 11:20, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Largest Employers? 
Talk:Florence Martus

message: How can her picture be dated "around 1850" when she was born in 1868? It can't even accidentally be off by 100 years as she died 1943. 91.49.19.162 (talk) 13:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Was likely a remnant from an infobox copy-and-paste. Seasider53 (talk) 13:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of photo
Talk:Forrest Pogue

message: The article should note if in fact he is the basis of the derogatory term "pogue" from the Vietnam War: , . The term dates as far back as WW2, when he served as a military historian with the rank of sergeant.  Odd and unfortunate coincidence, otherwise. Edison (talk) 23:20, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Definition of "pogue"

message: {| cellpadding="2" cellspacing="5" style="width:100%; background:none;"		This article was created or edited as part of the Smithsonian Institution Archives Edit-a-thon! This event focused on Smithsonian history! Please assume good faith about the edits made, as the editor who contributed recently to this article may be a newbie! Thanks, and you can learn more about the event here!
Sarah (talk) 16:29, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: This article was edited as part of the SIA edit-a-thon!
Talk:Frances Cluett

message: Maybe someone could add this book ref (from flankerpress dot com) to this article:
Your Daughter Fanny: The War Letters of Frances Cluett, VAD
Edited by Bill Rompkey and Bert Riggs September 2006 ISBN 10: 1-894463-92-7
ISBN 13: 978-1-894463-92-8
'Contained here are the war letters she sent to her mother in Newfoundland, telegrams describing the atrocities of war, the valiant deeds of comrades in arms, and the despair of young men dying on foreign shores.'
Also a ref to the given sample letter. --User:Brenont (talk) 02:51, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  WWI letters to her mother
Talk:Mobile Application Part

message: I'd vote for just binning the SRI page altogether.  It hardly contains any information, and what is there has errors in it (SRI isn't used for SMS, SRI-for-SM is).  If we let SRI stay around, we're opening ourselves up for having to have a page for every MAP message there is! 86.144.170.33 19:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'd be inclined to agree, to be honest; whilst having a list of MAP messages on this page would be useful (with selective in-depth discussions where appropriate), I don't think the current content of the SRI page is useful enough to stand on its own or as the beginnings of a list within this page. Nevalicori 19:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm - I'm generally against lists, but that's just me.  A list of MAP messages here could be a bit cumbersome for this page (there's a lot of MAP operations out there, especially with the added GPRS equivalent of standard GSM ones) - perhaps a sub-page?  Also, where's the line drawn?  Even in this Release 4/5/+ world, I have, in the last couple of years, deliberately used a MAP phase 1 operation that's not present in more recent releases, simply because more recent releases didn't have something that did what I wanted (SendParameters, in case anyone's interested).  86.144.170.33 20:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: You're probably right, especially given the specs are publicly available. In which case, there's little in favour of a merger, just a removal of the SRI page. Nevalicori 13:17, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Send Routing Info merger 

message: The article does not cover the MAP variant used in the U.S. and defined in the ANSI specification series X.S0004. I'd be delighted to have it treated in the article.
Vlk (talk) 10:55, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  MAP ANSI 

message: IS USSD using MAP?At Last ... (talk) 12:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  USSD
Talk:Dornier Do 215

message: Only needs an image to easily be a B-class. --Colputt 22:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: The article lists the maximum speed at 4000 m as 405 km/h (252 mph) and the cruise speed at the same elevation as 410 km/h (250 mph). Can this be correct? Also, 410 km/h is 253 mph, not 250 mph.@ Death Bredon (talk) 14:30, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Added by a now blocked editor in 2019, well known for mistakes in specs sections. I used a different source due to not having the sources listed, same variant but the weights differed, amended as they were also possibly incorrectly transcribed. Nimbus (Cumulus nimbus floats by) 08:48, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speeds?
Talk:Francis Edward Clark

message: I believe that the list of works is incomplete. From the title page of Old Homes of New Americans, it would appear that "Francis E Clark" is the same Francis Edward Clark as is associated with the Christian Endeavor movement.
See https://books.googleusercontent.com/books/content?req=AKW5Qadgmwxbd0QJSL6-JtNd8gDACJmk0TaBtw9uesHBum5xHqptAswipp0CCKdfS4RVhO3CPaHKRkANz7SEKoHySrIXe-Ug_P0smtyEWBYnXtuQ_EbpYEzEB48RRWbqL154QheK257jV_5sD0PQmbjheNLvbpuxR5E7nlWXjhCxGLms5v_x0dDwgxB9RLYdJVpxoa2shoz4uD7C5oFd-QRY5o7S9TzVB-OtGhzbAo7o3diBtYFZysMk3Z-AnhHwDO6bxVKyMJGauZrkgkcTryZ_V9yJBKtyVA Dmittman (talk) 03:39, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Old Homes of New Americans
Talk:Francis H. Kimball

message: the section on Frank Lucius Packard  can be removed from the article/  When I try and go into EDIT, I do not find that section there.  Or is it just me?
PS I see that the link about takes us to a completely different fellow. hmmmm
Carptrash (talk) 18:45, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  an ideas about how
Talk:John Archer (actor)

message: Find a Grave, All Movie, obituaries http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/obituary-john-archer-1132305.html and http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19991210&slug=3000433 give his death date as December 5, 1999 Thisdaytrivia (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 06:19, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Death
Talk:François Genoud

message: What was the origin of his fortune?
Was he a heir?
A successful financier prior to Nazi involvement?
The recipient of Nazi aid?
--Error (talk) 10:30, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: Hi. The article says that he made his fortune selling prominent nazi writings. Do you feel it is not clear enough or that his wealth coming from this is over-stated? W1tchkr4ft 00 (talk) 09:39, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
replies: text:  I see now that this was in the article already in 28 August 2020. Thanks for pointing it to me. --Error (talk) 20:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fortune
Talk:Frank Conniff (journalist)

message: Wait...his son is the TV write with the same name? The link in the article leads to the TV writer's profile. --2600:100F:B000:A22F:0:17:9C6D:8C01 (talk) 01:29, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. His son is "TV's Frank".yonnie (talk) 14:33, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Son???
Talk:Frank Johnson Goodnow

message: What's to discuss ?  Merge. DCDuring 03:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done!--Amban 02:35, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

text: I think I covered most of the ground, even the stuff about his controversial legacy at Johns Hopkins. It would be great if someone sat down and wrote up more about his work for Yuan Shikai, that's really worth having up there.--Amban 15:45, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting that the Yuan Shikai article doesn't make the constitution seem like a big deal until there was a war about it. DCDuring 15:54, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, but Yuan was more or less a dictator by 1913 already, so there were plenty of other things to fight about. Yuan Shikai is a really reviled person in Chinese history...--Amban 17:48, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Misc.
Talk:1951 NFL Championship Game

message: Bell negotiated a 95k contract, not 75k. The Associated Press looks to be the primary culprit with the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette falling into the trap and authors (e.g. Lyons, Patton) following suit. See MacCambridge p. 480 where he specifically discusses whether it was 75k or 95k.  Mac, quotes Keller from Sport and Television in the 1950s: A Preliminary Survey, 'Not even God knows much about televised sport in the 1950s.'66.234.33.8 (talk) 10:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: 75k or 95k for the game
Talk:Frank Schoonover

message: Durova removed both Schoonover's affilliation with what is now the Delaware Museum of Art, his death and the catalog which was offered as "Further Reading".  Does this mean we should promote ignorance in order to preserve the purity of our sources?  The rest is censored. Jplatt39 (talk) 12:19, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Could this photo be added or is it in the public domain?
http://www.erbzine.com/mag4/fes08v2.gif  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.230.182.3 (talk) 19:17, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible photo to add? 

message: OK boys and girls, let's talk. 
This is the kind of thing which drives professors, instructors and adjuncts up the wall when it comes to Wikipedia.
So, let's fix this problem. 
The problem is: In the little box off to the right it says Frank Schoonover died in August of 1972 BUT...
in the 1st paragraph of the actual Wiki-article September 1, 1972 is listed as the day of Frank Schoonover's death. 
I think it is safe to say Schoonover did not die in two different months. 
Whoever is in charge of this Wiki-article should find out what the correct day of Frank Schoonover's death is and get rid of the discrepancy 
as well as fuel, for those in charge of higher education, to fan the flames of criticism of this important resource; namely, Wikipedia.
184.76.56.97 (talk) 08:23, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  There is a discrepancy. 
Talk:Frank Stenton

message: Is housed somewhere... something I lost while I couldn't edit. All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 04:10, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Is that a question...? If so, maybe the answer's here... Nortonius (talk) 08:50, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Stenton's coin collection
Talk:Dactyl (poetry)

message: The term was defined as referring to metre both by syllable and stress, but broke the definition between the lead (containing the line "In quantitative verse...") and a lower paragraph (the other half: "In accentual verse...").
I united both halves to the lead, grouped the example that was in the lead with the other examples listed lower, fixed spelling of "anapaest" and hyperlinked that word.
No wording/sentence changes were made.  Please see the {diff}.Joevanisland 19:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Lead