Talk:Zygiella x-notata

message: Overall, this article was very good. The main sections, Mating, Web, and Diet, are all well-developed with lots of properly cited information and the subcategories within them are well-titled and well balanced in terms of how much information is in each and in terms of how the information flows from one to the next. 
 
In the section titled Description, I don’t think the last sentence belongs. The sentence “Zygiella x-notata are commonly found on human constructions, such as window frames, walls and fences, as well as on urban vegetations such as bushes or shrubs They are also typically found around boats and on docks throughout the world” would be better suited for the habitat and distribution section to explain what structures the spiders like to live on or around. Further, I think the description under habitat can be more detailed. Readers will likely want to know more about where the spider is originally from and what continents/regions it can be found in today. 
 
Lastly, in your article you mention several researchers and their published work (According to Anotaux et al..., Bel-Venner et al. shows that… etc etc). I’m not sure you have to do this if you cite the source at the end of the sentence. Perhaps in order to aid the brevity and readability, you can take these introductions out. 
 
Overall, your explanations of the spider mating behavior and web construction and prey capture was very clear and intelligible. I think this article has minimal edits that can be made to improve it as it stands. 
Sandeep525 (talk)
Hello! This article was well done and very informative. I moved the last part of your Description section (which was discussing where the spider can be found) and edited it into the Habitat section. I also made the distribution section a little clearer based on other information you had given in the article. Shaynarosenbloom (talk)  —Preceding undated comment added 01:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Student Edits

message: Substituted at 11:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment comment

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified  on Zygiella x-notata. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071008010154/http://www.biocrawler.com/videos/displayimage.php?album=9&pos=28 to http://www.biocrawler.com/videos/displayimage.php?album=9&pos=28
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I have condensed a couple sections into one (Juvenile + Adult Feeding --> Feeding, and Physiology --> Description), as some of the sections only consisted of a single sentence. I rearranged the image of the webs next to the "Webs" category, and I also made grammar, syntax, and punctuation edits. Overall, a very informative, well-written article.
Dyklee (talk) 03:46, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behavioral Ecology Peer Review 

message: I think that the Zygiella x-notata should be a GA. From all the articles I read for the class, I think that this one has a good about of information, is really well written. This article has the right amount of information for each of the sections/subsection, along with a good amount of references. Also, it has good information about the behavior of this species: Diet, Mating Behavior, Reproductive and Life Cycle, Social Behavior, Web Construction. I think these points can make it a good article! And how to forget that it was part of the Did you know section in November!  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salazarjhan (talk • contribs) 21:28, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Behavioral Ecology Peer Review 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion