Talk:Post–Kyoto Protocol negotiations on greenhouse gas emissions

message: The text suggests the 2008 meeting in Poznań has already taken place. That is not the case and the information provided is therefore incorrect. The meeting will be held from 1-12 December. Please also note the correct spelling of Poznań.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.11.30.98 (talk) 19:53, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poznań 

message: Add Presidency of Barack Obama and related Politics of global warming (United States).  99.190.87.126 (talk) 06:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Why? — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 06:45, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: This article is now called "Climate change policy of the United States".  Just an FYI.  216.250.156.66 (talk) 00:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

text: Also see Foreign policy of the Obama administration regarding Climate change, Environmental policy of the United States, and Energy policy of the United States.  216.250.156.66 (talk) 19:45, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Add [[Presidency of Barack Obama]] and related [[Politics of global warming (United States)]]. 

message: Obama's envoy for climate change casts doubt on Kyoto protocol; Todd Stern hints progress at climate talks in South Africa may stall with insistence on limits on greenhouse gas emissions by Fiona Harvey, environment correspondent guardian.co.uk  19 September 2011 21.38 BST  97.87.29.188 (talk) 23:36, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: See Todd Stern, and 2011 United Nations Climate Change Conference.  99.112.214.32 (talk) 01:02, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  resource 

message: * http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-06/australia-joins-new-zealand-seeking-pollution-curbs-beyond-kyoto-countries.html
* http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-12-06/eu-new-zealand-can-t-be-world-idiots-on-climate-envoy-says.html
99.190.82.160 (talk) 07:19, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  resources 

message: The benefits of strong, early action considerably outweigh the costs. According to Stern report each tonne of CO2 we emit causes damages worth at least $85, but emissions can be cut at a cost of less than $25 a tonne. The private persons make the wins while the costs are socialised. Does this not conflict with the universal human rights? ( ref Stern report: the key points 30 Oct 2006) 
2013 United Nations Climate Change Conference negotiate the rights to climate change emissions. As James Hansen pointed out in 2008, the  organizations with high emissions should be charged in the International Court of Justice. In minimum why does the negotiators not put all the companies to pay all the consequenses of their emissions? Experts have continuously stated very strong warnings at least since year 1970.  Watti Renew (talk) 16:08, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Human Rights 

message: I removed these sections as they have no reason to be at this page:
===United Nations Climate Change Report ===
July 2014 UN report set actions for the biggest 15 economies to keep warming below 2C. America, Australia, Brazil, Britain, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, and South Korea account for 70% of global emissions.UN issued with roadmap on how to avoid climate catastrophe The Guardian 8.7.2014summaryfull UN report
=== Emission decline demand in the EU 80 % from year 2000 to 2050 ===
To limit global warming in 2°C with 70% confident level Swedish emissions should decline 70% and EU emissions 80% from year 2000 to year 2050. This is in 37 years from now.Uppdatering av den vetenskapliga grunden för klimatarbetet: En översyn av naturvetenskapliga aspekter För att nå tvågradersmålet med i storleksordningen 70 % sannolikhet krävs, givet en globalt lika per capita fördelning av utsläppen från och med 2050, att utsläppen i Sverige minskar med cirka 70 % från år 2005 till 2050. Den motsvarande siffran för EU är cirka 80 %.  How could the bought emission rights from China help to cut emissions anywhere while China increase its emissions annually? Why is there no obligation to cut emissions also at home? Professor Christian Azar, Swedish lead author of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (Institutionen för energi och miljö, Fysisk resursteori, Chalmers) have written that we are not credible if we do not cut the emissions also in our own country in Europe.Chriastian Azar: Makten over klimatet, Bonnier hösten 2008
KVDP (talk) 16:45, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Removed sections

message: To limit global warming in 2°C with 70% confident level Swedish emissions should decline 70% and EU emissions 80% from year 2000 to year 2050. This is in 37 years from now.Uppdatering av den vetenskapliga grunden för klimatarbetet: En översyn av naturvetenskapliga aspekter För att nå tvågradersmålet med i storleksordningen 70 % sannolikhet krävs, givet en globalt lika per capita fördelning av utsläppen från och med 2050, att utsläppen i Sverige minskar med cirka 70 % från år 2005 till 2050. Den motsvarande siffran för EU är cirka 80 %.  How could the bought emission rights from China help to cut emissions anywhere while China increase its emissions annually? Why is there no obligation to cut emissions also at home? Professor Christian Azar, Swedish lead author of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (Institutionen för energi och miljö, Fysisk resursteori, Chalmers) have written that we are not credible if we do not cut the emissions also in our own country in Europe.Chriastian Azar: Makten over klimatet, Bonnier hösten 2008
KVDP (talk) 16:45, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Emission decline demand in the EU 80 % from year 2000 to 2050 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Post–Kyoto Protocol negotiations on greenhouse gas emissions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080612113122/http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/14/europe/EU-GEN-Sweden-Environment-Conference.php to http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/14/europe/EU-GEN-Sweden-Environment-Conference.php
*Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2007/1215/1197543946992.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: I think it is useless. If you think it is useful how do you think it is useful and to who?Chidgk1 (talk) 16:02, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  How is this article useful?