lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Battle of Tzirallum

message: I have edited the article to correct a couple of apparent inaccuracies. Firstly, Lactantius is clear that the battle happens on the Campus Serenus between the first and second stations west of Heraclea Perinthus (the modern-day town of Marmara Ereğlisi). A previous editor has confused this location with Heraclea Sintica in modern Bulgaria.
Second, another editor also appears to have suffered a geographical misunderstanding when adding coordinates  that place the battle near Karadeniz Ereğli instead of Marmara Ereğlisi. I have adjusted the coordinates to  to match those for Marmara Ereğlisi, although they could be moved west to the actual battle site if a reliable modern reference for that can be found.
If any reader feels that these changes are unwarranted, I'd be happy to discuss them here. Rupert Clayton (talk) 00:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: Moved location to Corlu after more research. Rupert Clayton (talk) 00:40, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Correcting some apparent inaccuracies
Talk:Battle of Solicinium

message: The article on Valentinian I says 367, and here 368. Cornelius (talk) 21:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I think 368 is correct, according to this reference and two older ones. --NearEMPTiness (talk) 19:27, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  367 or 368?
Talk:Battle of Mursa Major

message: Fueled by the belief that Constantine wished for his sons to rule a tripartite empire after him, the military massacred Constantinian family members.[8] This massacre precipitated a redivisioning of the empire, by which Constantine took Gaul, Hispania, and Britain, while Constans acquired Italy, Africa, Dacia, and Illyricum, and Constantius inherited Asia, Egypt, and Syria.[9]
The first statement suggests that Constantine's sons were killed by the military, and the second that they then took over power. I find this very confusing. Who, exactly, was massacred?
Maury Markowitz (talk) 11:36, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  I am confused by the massacre?
Talk:Abe Schwartz

message: This guy fits in several categories.  Right now, I have him in keyboardist-stub, bowed-musician-stub, and composer-stub.  He was in JewHist-stub, but I've been told that people shouldn't be in history stubs, so I removed that one (and I'm saying so here in case someone gets PO'd and wants to put it back). --Jemiller226 05:56, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  Stub types 

message: I have removed the huge discography table that was taking up most of this article and moved it to Abe Schwartz discography. Sorry, I don't like to undo anyone's hard work but the article otherwise barely had any information and that immense table does not make it readable for someone looking up basic facts about Abe Schwartz. --Dan Carkner (talk) 22:53, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: that's fine, but when you do something like please link to the moved information.  Thanks!  78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 23:30, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Sorry, I was taking my time with a more developed update to the article and I was planning to work it into my new content somehow. As you can see I added a few more references and I will add some more if I can find them. --Dan Carkner (talk) 01:23, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

text: VERY nice!  Fantastic work! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:26, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  removed discography table
Talk:Raid of Nassau

message: Shouldn't "March 1st, 1775" be 1776 (based on the other info in the article)? AnonMoos 21:08, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, thanks. Kevin Myers 22:07, March 25, 2006 (UTC)
I've tried to find a reference to "Fort Nassau" and have failed.  Could this be referring to Fort Stanley or Fort D'Arcy, or is Fort Nassau no longer in existence?Ealtram (talk) 18:35, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Date issue

message: Hello, just wanted to let you know that I've copy-edited this article of the Battle of Nassau by removing some commas and improper verb tense. Thanks  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Unholydoom993 (talk • contribs) 03:35, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quick Edit, May 27, 2016 

message: Who is "Hand"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tamagosh (talk • contribs) 00:11, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: It's a typo for "Field". Magic♪piano 01:27, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Reference

message: The first sentence and the infobox have dates that do not sync up. Did the raid last 10 days or just 2? —howcheng  {chat} 08:13, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The information—about the battle—leads to the conclusion that the direct military clash between the two forces was limited to March 3 and 4. It seems that the dates "March 1–10" had referred to the duration of the entire operation, and not to the battle itself (although the American forces did arrive near Nassau on March 1, they did not depart until "two weeks" had passed, so the March 10 date's provenance is uncertain). I have thus changed the date in the lead sentence of the article, so that it conforms to a more strict interpretation of the meaning of "battle" and I have removed the "contradiction" tag. catsmoke (talk) 08:07, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dates
Talk:Automatic Performance Control

message: On the Saab H engines page, the horsepower game from APC was from 107 kW to 114 kW, opposed to the 108 to 116 on this page. Which is it? Can someone clarify? - victorvp (talk)
----
HP/KW figures are based on calculation error
145BHP/1.36 =106 kW. This is correct. However writer converted from kW to BHP and was 4BHP short (106kW/0.75=141 BHP)and corrected by adding a few kW (108kW/0.75 = 145BHP)
The right calculation is 106kW x 1.36 (instead of deviding with 0.75)= 145bhp
Marc (Holland, marchq@hotmail.com)
----
Can anyone clarify what the APC gauge means?  Does the red mean more boost or more knock and less boost, etc?Freonr2 05:09, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Power gain claim
Talk:Adem Ilhan

message: The "leading light in nu-folk" statement is questionable to me.  What exactly constitutes a leading light?  --Jemiller226 06:19, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title:  NPOV? 

message: A lower case Adem disambiguation page was needed.
There are many Adems now, the old disambiguation page was all upper case, when there's only one 
abbreviation; Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.
Some of the footballers called Adem are well known by that as well.
Disambiguation pages are rarely upper case when there are dozens of people's names on it, etc.
Regards. Archy1975 (talk) 13:54, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Update
Talk:ES Troyes AC

message: :The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 
The result of the move request was: moved to ES Troyes AC. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 20:07, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Troyes AC →  – The current name doesn't seem to be the common name. ESTAC Troyes seems to be more the common name for me. Additionally, the official twitter account says ESTAC Troyes. It's the correct move for this club. An alternative is ES Troyes AC. Paul Vaurie (talk) 19:28, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

text: Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 15:44, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move 9 June 2021 

message: The redirect 2023–24 ES Troyes AC season has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached.  Steel1943 (talk) 19:03, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  "[[:2023–24 ES Troyes AC season]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
Talk:Hans Hermann von Katte

message: I moved the text below here from Hans Hermann Von Katte's Letter, as it is a duplicate of a page already on afd: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Letter to his Father after King Frederick denies pardon. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a collection of source texts, but by moving the text here the content will be kept and can be used in a future revision of Katte's biography. u p p l a n d 08:10, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Move

message: The following trivia section was removed:
:"In the 1995 film Braveheart a character based on Katte appears as the (presumed) lover of the son of Edward I of England. The effeminate Prince's lover is killed by Edward in front of the Prince by being pushed from a window, the scene (excepting the method of execution) is almost directly lifted from the execution of Katte with the English Prince taking the role of Frederick the Great."
This needs to be sourced.  Edward II of England was probably gay and his father exiled his lover Piers Gaveston. This seems to parallel the Braveheart plot. Unless there's specific evidence that the makers of Braveheart used the Katte, I don't think there's a connection.--Bkwillwm 07:01, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove trivia section, Braveheart 

message: I've removed the category "Pederasts."  If there is any suggestion of this, it isn't found in this article.  Regardless of the nature of von Katte and Frederick's relationship, they were certainly of comperable age.  If this is meant in reference to something else, it ought to be specified.142.177.91.230 05:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed Category 

message: Katte was beheaded with an execution sword. There was no chopping block. Executions with the sword were performed while the victim was kneeling or sitting in a chair, with his or her head held upright. Sometimes executioner's assitants seized the hair from above and held it to make sure the head did not move.--Kauko56 13:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed "Chopping block" 
Talk:Wilferd Madelung

message: Currently it says: "He was particularly celebrated in Iran for his "knowledgeable and fair" treatment of the Shia perspective." This statement refers to a single article in the Tehran Times newspaper reporting on an event on Madelung. Despite this praise, the article there is written in a rather condescending tone and the quote reproduced here is not entirely representative. Madelung has certainly been rather widely received in Iran because of his research on Shiism, but the portrayal of his reception there based on one newspaper article is somewhat problematic: very poor ranking in the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Press_Freedom_Index. Could someone present this a little more broadly or better backed up?--BineMaja (talk) 16:56, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: There weren't many obituaries to choose from when I added that, which was right after his death. I made the best of what there was. Better sources might exist now, but his focus and specialism on Shi'ism is notable. Iskandar323 (talk) 06:11, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Thank you Iskandar323 for your good explication. So I looked for more biographical material and obituaries and, with reference to that, have broadened the presentation of Madelung's life, research and impact a bit, in addition to the quote discussed here that you inserted. BineMaja (talk) 12:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Question about the introduction

message: Info here:   — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arash azizi (talk • contribs) 13:33, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Madelung has passed away

message: Many facts can be imorted from here: 
--Striver 06:46, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Whoopi (TV series)

message: Category:Black sitcoms? This is not a black sitcom!--58.104.20.47 07:04, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: No, that was Makin' Whoopi.--58.104.34.159 11:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Black sitcom
Talk:Jack Paar

message: The edits by User:Danny were, for the most part, not sound; I replaced the parts of the article that he moved around and revised it more generally to give the article's text a better flow from the version previous to Danny's edits, although I did leave in what Danny added about Paar's triple heart bypass surgery. I deleted the section header "Return after leaving show" and moved the content from that section into a more appropriate place at the end of "Highly emotional."
In addition, I wikilinked a few terms, added and corrected some crucial dates, and added the external link to the Museum of Broadcast Communications site about Paar.
It's my hope that these edits will find favor with the community; please leave any comments about the edits here, and I will gladly respond to them. Telestylo 07:11, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Who is "Dunning" that referred to Paar as a "spoiled kid" as mentioned in this article?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odestiny (talk • contribs) 18:32, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Dunning

message: Before my edit, the article listed Paar as being born in Jackson, Michigan "30 miles south of Lansing, Michigan". However, it is actually closer to 40 miles south of Lansing, so I made a minor touch-up edit so that it now reads "approximately 40 miles south of Lansing,  Michigan". I hope this doesn't seem nit-picky of me, but I'm from Lansing, MI myself and knew the 30 mile claim didn't seem quite right. ADg2k14 (talk) 21:20, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Place of Birth 
Talk:Mischa Elman

message: What happened to all the Elman recordings?  In 1990 I was in Tower Records in NY city and I remember seeing many Elman recordings for sale inluding the victrola recordings and the later vanguard Khachaturian/Saint-Saens recording.  Why are they not available now?  I would like to know.
His recordings are available on and off, but one must hunt to find them all. Nodrog71 06:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: There a nice picture of him available at Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/statelibraryofnsw/4294637326/sizes/o/ --Damiens.rf 17:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nice picture 

message: The "portrait photo" is erroneously flipped left-to-right.  Elman didn't play as that picture depicts.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.119.204.117 (talk) 18:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Photo flipped
Talk:Jamil al-Assad

message: Was the Joshua Landis blog actually used as a source for this: "Syria expert Joshua Landis states that Jamil for a period during the 1980s claimed he was al-Mahdi al-Muntadhir, the awaited savior Imam of Shia Islam." If so, did he say it anywhere else? We don't normally use blogs as sources. SlimVirgin (talk) 08:04, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: We have a few policies on sources, and they more or less rule out using blogs. In case you want to read them, they're Wikipedia:Verifiability, Wikipedia:No original research (both policy, meaning they're mandatory) and Wikipedia:Reliable sources (a guideline, meaning it's only a suggestion but people do tend to stick to guidelines). However, there's a discussion going on at Wikipedia_talk:Reliable_sources#Blogs about whether we should start to allow blogs from professional people, academics and the like, so long as they have expertise in the area their blog is being used for. I'd definitely rather leave the Landis information in with the blog as a source than remove it. SlimVirgin (talk) 08:57, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Landis claim
Talk:Šamac, Bosnia and Herzegovina

message: Why was this article moved to "Šamac"? It should be named "Bosanski Šamac", and the article "Šamac" should be a disambiguation page, as there are two places with the name: Bosanski Šamac and Slavonski Šamac. 220.245.178.137 08:15, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm pretty sure it's "Slavonski Šamac" (but I'm lazy to check as well :-) ) Duja 14:37, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: The naming of the article

message: The electoral commission has no legal force in the naming of towns. It is all according to the Закон о територијалној организацији и локалној самоуправи Републике Српске and the Constitution. --Methodius 06:03, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Official site of the government of Republika Srpska use name Šamac. See for yourself: http://www.vladars.net/en/srpska/opstine.html PANONIAN 09:16, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

text: "Bosanski Šamac/Šamac" means that two names are used equally in such documents, which again prove that Šamac is official name used in official documents and you have no reason to delete this name - same apply to Cyrillic script which is one of two official scripts used in the whole Bosnia and Herzegovina. PANONIAN 11:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name 

message: Uhm the RS authorities don't have the competency anywhere in the constitution to change towns names, this is done illegally, why is wikipedia obliging to this? Ask the central government of the country what the name is, it is Bosanski Samac. I am getting so tired of this Serbian BS on wikipedia.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.208.220.62 (talk) 17:46, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: name change
Talk:Rub-a-dub-dub

message: there is more interesting stuff to say about this poem. I found this article searching the web to find out the history of the rhyme, but wikipedia didn't have much. I did find this interesting bit, but since i'm not sure of it's copyright history i'm shoving it here so it can be cleaned up.
from http://omega.cohums.ohio-state.edu/mailing_lists/CLA-L/1998/11/0627.php
And I quote, from _The Annotated Mother Goose_:
Rub-a-dub-dub,
Three men in a tub,
And how do you think they got there?*
The butcher, the baker,
The candle-stick maker,
They all jumped out of a rotten potato,
'Twas enough to make a man stare.
*(Footnote:) "This line is sometimes given as 'And who do you think they be?' The last line is then given as "Turn 'em out, knaves all three!' ....the earliest printed version gives a rather different picture of the three tradesmen:         
Hey rub-a-dub-dub, ho! three maids in a tub, And who do you think were there?
The butcher, the baker, the candlestick-maker, And all of them gone to the fair.
'Apparently,' say the editors of _The Oxford Dictionary of Nursery Rhymes_,
they have been found in a place where no respectable townfolk should be, watching a dubious side-show at the local fair.'
The word Knave is synonmyous with Jack or Journeyman.
==
I think the article is missing (arguably) a more appropriate meaning of "knave": 
"An unprincipled man, given to dishonourable and deceitful practices; a base and crafty rogue. (Now the main sense. Often contrasted with fool." (OED)  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleraama (talk • contribs) 00:19, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Islamic views on slavery

message: @Iskandar323, I couldn't find any sentence other than in the lead that said:
Can you point them out for me?
Also, just as a friendly reminder, WP:Burden states that:
Kaalakaa (talk) 19:25, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: I've clarified and trimmed it a bit. The mamluk sultanate is certainly mentioned, and is an exceptionally famous example of an Islamic slave-run empire. This is very run of the mill information: why would something on it not be in the lead summary? However, there is a broader point, which is that this article has a dual/mixed scope. Islamic views on something aren't the same thing as examples of the practice of something in nominally Islamic constituencies. This article probably needs to be split into the actual subject of 'Islamic views' and a separate page on 'Slavery in the Muslim world'. Iskandar323 (talk) 19:49, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead material 

message: Please remove the sentence mentioning Quran 39:95, as there is no such verse. The 39. surah only has 75 verses. Fungus Generator (talk) 20:28, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Changed it to link to 39:29 as quote from the cited source reads "In one case, the Qur'an refers to master and slave with the same word, rajul (q 39:29)." Cannolis (talk) 01:45, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 8 August 2023 

message: The section under "quran" that reads "all Quranic rules on slaves are emancipatory in that they improve the rights of slaves compared to what was already practiced in the 7th century." is an OPINION with one author cited. There are MANY other authors who argue the contrary; that NO rules on quranic slavery are at all emancipatory, specifically citing the slaves present at the time of the death of mohammed, including his female slave, Maryam the Copt. This text should either be changed to "some muslim apologists opine that all quranic rules..." or allow the contradicting view.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8801:9E21:400:9C66:BE65:B6D8:596C (talk) 20:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Quranic rules as "emancipatory" is an opinion...not fact
Talk:Ryu (Breath of Fire)

message: Is Ryu's name ever defined anywhere?  Because every time I've played a BoF game, you choose his name..  So I wonder, is Ryu the official name, or is it the generally accepted name among the fans of the BoF series.--Vercalos 09:27, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
replies: text: Yes. That's the official name for the character. -ZeroTalk 21:50, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name
Category talk:Sports occupations and roles

message: The category known as People_known_in_connection_with_sports_and_hobbies seems similar to this one. Shawnc 09:42, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Comment

message: We have a problem here with overly nested categories like "endless do-loops" that cause subject to be on multiple lists unnecessarily. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT PRAISE 18:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Nested catagories
Talk:Mulholland Falls

message: At one time I used to edit a lot of quotes into film articles. But I've come to relize that the wiki consensus is to use them sparingly, if at all.  Hence, I eliminated a few quotes.  I only left in quotes that describe the ethos of the "Hat Squad."  Well that's my thinking for deleting a few quotes. Luigibob 14:26, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Quotes
Talk:Pi Kappa Phi

message: Michael Sliwa 2600:8807:A900:C3C0:949B:9EA:B007:F278 (talk) 17:03, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

message: , I sympathize over your recent edits, seeking to remove detail about several campus disciplinary actions or closures.  The Project group that monitors GLO pages has standardized our treatment of these items on "national" pages by forcing these specific points under a subtitle "Local chapter or member misconduct", and we require solid citations.  Previous to our standardization efforts it had been common to list these as "Controversies"; but in all cases I know if, these have never been systemic in nature, and are, rather, local.  When these pop up, here and for other GLOs, any negative barking without citation is removed.  But Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia, so we cannot simply hide inconvenient facts.  We remain neutral wherever possible.  
After about a decade has passed since a hazing injury, alcohol disciplinary action or cited negative story, unless these have significant and persistent national news notoriety, we 'demote' the negative story into a reference item placed against that chapter's line in the fraternity's chapter list.  My rationale for this is that the 'offenders' are thus long gone from the chapter, and it is likely that two or three generations of members have came and went via graduation: that chapter thus is a new organization, and it is not fair to label those actives as offenders.  We are also vigilant to ensure that negative information does not declare the entire national to be bad; these are not "systemic" problems that affect the entire national.  Rather, they are instances of errors at the local or individual level. Jax MN (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent edits, removing misconduct citations