lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Georgia Bulldogs football under Vince Dooley

message: This person or persons keeps going to all NCAA pages and remarkably has the attendance to all games of the past. On this page they say a year book as sores. I can claim anything myself however that does show the sores. I think it needs something more than that.  I think this person needs to be blocked altogether. MDSanker 00:24, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: If you go to the media guide for 2012 it shows some of the numbers a close or the same. However I randomly checked two years and the number are made up. 1964 This poster has 738361 total, real number was 364142, they had the top attendance game right GT game 52050. 1966 was the next year I checked this one was closer they have  428734 tot, real number was 416368, the top att game they have SMU at 75504 real was Florida 62800, they had this game as 62820. This kind of proves my point http://issuu.com/georgiadogs/docs/uga-fb-12-web/143#share  MDSanker 12:40, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  IP vandalism 129.15.131.141 
Talk:Acoustic homing

message: 1. The article could be improved with the addition of reliable and relevant references. While the definition included provides a description of Acoustic homing, it does not reference any other source that defines the term.
2. The "Uses" section describes the application of acoustic homing in weaponry, however, the article would be more comprehensive if it included other applications for the technology.  Allym7 (talk) 22:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Talk:Red Flag – Alaska

message: :"Conceived by Brigadier General Richard G. Head"
Or, as he's known to his best friends, Dick Head?  Just curious if this actually was a real person, or did someone slip a funny in on us? RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions  17:55, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
replies: text:  Richard G Head seems to be a real person. BRIGADIER GENERAL RICHARD G. HEAD--Josephus37 (talk) 04:06, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

text: Have had the hyphen changed.--Josephus37 (talk) 03:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Talk:Hyde Park station (New York Central Railroad)

message: What's the "B 361" and "NY 79"? Distance to Buffalo and New York? --NE2 08:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Probably. Those mileages would be about right. Daniel Case (talk) 16:01, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Global meteoric water line

message: I don't think mathematical formulas can be copyrighted so I believe the page should stand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jado818 (talk • contribs) 
::I think you are broadly right regarding the copyright of actual raw formulae (although I am sure there are some exceptions) however the problem with this article is that it is not just an expression of the formula.  It is the extra words/sentences and the context within which the formula is described which is the problem being as it has obviously been copy and pasted from another website which is copyright to Arizona Board of Regents.  nancy  09:37, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Comments

message: This article helped explaining the origin of Global Meteoric waterline, displaying an empirical equation and briefly addressing the application for it. A few  more aspects can be considered to further build this article:
1. when refers to "hydrogen and oxygen isotopes", it did not refer to the specific isotope type for the two elements, which can be further linked to other Wikipedia articles.
2. the explanation of the theoretical bases for this topic- kinetic fractionation is jargonic for the public to understand.
3. the description about Craig's assertion needs to be paraphrased, and further explained in a non-specialist perspective.
4. the applications of this topic in environmental studies can be expanded.
5. images can be added to help explain the theoretical bases for hydrogen and oxygen isotopic fractionation and applications of this topic . SiminZhao (talk) 22:23, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Evaluation Comment: Content
Talk:Vanessa Hudgens discography

message: sneakernight is currently 17, and not 20.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.47.184.178 (talk) 10:10, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed.—Kww(talk) 11:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  sneakernight on hot dance club play 

message: edit looks fishy. No explanation provided, no sources cited.--Airplaneman (talk) 19:18, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  fishy 
Talk:HMS Terrible (1895)

message: These two cruisers supposedly had the two largest bronze castings up to that date incorporated in the bow and stern.AT Kunene (talk) 14:53, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Building 

message: Deck of the ship and the crew:
http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/94505453/resource/
©Geni 14:40, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: 3d image pair
Talk:Capsular contracture

message: I don't understand.  It's the one on the right that has the issue?  That's the only normal looking one I see.
You are an idiot. Her right breast is the one on the left--it is a photograph.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.224.166.14 (talk) 12:15, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: right?
Template talk:Super Bowl XXVI

message: From what I gathered at Databasefootball.com, the following players played for the Redskins during the 1991 NFL season: John Brandes, Travis Curtis, Terry Hoage, Jimmie Johnson, Joe Johnson, Markus Koch, Ed Simmons, Ralph Tamm, and Clarence Vaughn.  But I dont know if any of them played in the Super Bowl or the numbers they had.  Is there a site or something your using?  Also, I could not find any info on Ed Williams, are you sure he was on the team?  Great templates, I will also check the other Redskins Super Bowl templates to see if there are any other players missing.  Jwalte04 (talk) 05:13, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Other players?
Talk:Fluidized bed combustion

message: The following text by editors was moved here from the article, and seems to indicate unsourced items. G.A.Stalk 19:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Original research? 

message: There is a note on the large number of overlaps in fluidization articles here: Talk:Fluidization#Article overlaps. If anyone has comment, let's have the conversation there.  J JMesserly (talk) 20:26, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Article overlaps
Talk:Theresian Military Academy

message: There are no sources for this page Banime (talk) 05:21, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The Norwegian Military Academy was established on 16 december 1750. Inge (talk) 12:40, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oldest? 

message: The one in Norway was relocated in its place several times, whereas the one in Wiener Neustadt has constantly existed as a military academy (or NCO school during WWII) since 1752, only being closed between its destruction in 1945 and 1959.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.83.252.26 (talk) 16:46, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Yes, oldest!
Talk:Financially Distressed Municipalities Act

message: 1) References to 2 and 3 appear to be the same newspaper article.
2) That article does say that no city has emerged from Act 47.  The table shows that several cities have had their 'designation rescinded'.  What's the difference between emerging from act 47 and 'designation rescinded'?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.26.68.11 (talk) 19:35, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No city has emerged from Act 47, however other types of municipalites (boroughs or townships) have. 71.254.119.3 (talk) 00:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Two questions 

message: As of June Altoona is under Act 47, so that bit of the article and the table need updated. http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2012/06/altoona_joins_harrisburg_and_2.html 71.254.119.3 (talk) 00:36, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: Other articles put it as of May 3, to be exact. 71.254.119.3 (talk) 00:44, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Altoona
Talk:Ras Al Khaimah Men's College

message: Article merged: see new talk page at Talk:Higher Colleges of Technology
----
I am currently helping students in the design of a wikipedia site that explains their college. We looked at other tertiary education istitutes and based our start from theirs. We looked at Harvard and Dekan for example and attempted to mirror what they had, but felt thay Dekan for example was too "selling" so remained more neutral in our approach.
We are in the process of correcting/editing the page and will do what it takes to keep it up. Best regards, what is the way forward?
Stephen Pellerine Stephen R. Pellerine (talk) 05:40, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Fougasse (weapon)

message: I have read oral histories of the Korean War stating that when US troops improvised fougasse type devices for defensive fortifications, they often used the term "Martin flare" to describe the device.  Has anyone else heard this terminology?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.41.40.21 (talk) 12:44, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I have copied this question to Talk:Flame fougasse. Gaius Cornelius (talk) 18:19, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Martin flare?" 

message: Well, it's not the same thing, short fuse or anything else ? Mike Coppolano (talk) 11:02, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  German "Faddermine" 

message: Or: Why was a bomb named after a kind of bread? Lockesdonkey (talk) 00:24, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: There was an annotation from 2015 that a citation was needed for the claim that a 'flintlock' mechanism replaced the black powder tube and made the firing mechanism more water resistant. I have no idea what the person who added that note was thinking, but since black powder is notoriously susceptible to moisture and since a flintlock mechanism is much less so (especially if the moving parts are greased), I removed the citation. Not only has it been nearly 5 years unanswered, but the note is of little or no value. A flintlock mechanism can be tested prior to installation while the only way to test a chemical fuse is to destroy it, for example. Should someone wish to restore the note, they should explain why, it seems to me.40.142.179.222 (talk) 20:03, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  snaphance
Talk:Francisco Castellón

message: On 27 January 2008, Avman45 changed the date of his death from 2 September 1855 to 8 September 1855.  I have asked Avman45 for a citation for this.  Bancroft History of Central America, 1501-1887 volume 8, says on page 334 that Castellón's death was on 2 September. --Bejnar (talk) 00:35, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Death date
Talk:Rhinebeck Village Historic District

message: Tone: "the village was again favored by the presence of an American president." That's a rather Victorian and complaisant construction for a publication that isn't a small-town magazine. Hardly encyclopedic in tone. Stevew316 (talk) 14:15, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, I go read Hudson Heights, Manhattan, find some glaring problems, so you look through my contribs to find some problem with my work. Well, you did find some things worth working on. But you need to understand running citations, and when I work on it later I'll put page numbers in. Daniel Case (talk) 00:50, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:DailyStrength

message: this DailyStrength page is not a wikipedia item page but rather a press release by DailyStrength.
it is not what wikipedia is all about!
did anyone get paid to allow this?
217.132.19.65 (talk) 06:39, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

message: Social Networks Quantity  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.35.208 (talk) 09:32, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Social Networks Quantity 
Talk:Ceremonial deism

message: That they use the term "ceremonial deism" is disgusting, and dishonourable to the true spirit of Deism, which is secular and humanistic. The courts should change the phrase to "Ceremonial Theism", and we Deists need to pressure them to do so, we must get the word out that this ceremonial imposition has NOTHING to do with Deism in any way. And then once we've accomplished this, we need to also join with the Atheists,Agnostics, Humanists, and many others in fighting to remove this "ceremonial Theism" from existence in the free west.--Iconoclastithon (talk) 21:59, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just now saw your comments here (sorry I didn't reply before) -- but I reverted you because your whole elaborate thing about a period of 14 years being "long and customary" was simply historically factually false, since In God We Trust was used on COINS as early as the Civil war -- just not on bills (as is documented on the In God We Trust article). AnonMoos (talk) 12:00, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Spirit of deism

message: I think ceremonial deism has something to do with Anglo-American Freemasons, at least in Regular lodges, since in most Latin or Continental lodges, the name of God is always omitted per liberal lodge policy, which is agnostic/atheist. ADM (talk) 19:14, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Freemasons

message: I just added a few references to when the term has been used in supreme court decisions. If there are any objections (style, formatting, content, neutrality, citations, &c.) please let me know -- this is my first edit to a Wikipedia article, and I'm sure I'm guilty of plenty of gaffes, but I'd like to learn.Nitsua60 (talk) 03:35, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: References

message: I find it a little unsettling that the Nussbaum quote is pulled from a paragraph-ending parenthetical statement in the referenced article. While Dr. Nussbaum lays out a compelling history of both "under God" and "in God we trust" and their treatment by the courts, I'm not sure why we're holding her up as an authority on what Deists think and endorse.
The sentiment--let's consider what Deists think about the phrase "ceremonial Deism"--is certainly laudable. I'm going to take some time to try and find material from Deists on the matter; if anyone out there has more-extensive knowledge than mine of Deist tenets please do chime in.
Nitsua60 (talk) 15:00, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Nussbaum quote
Talk:Dirty Dingus Magee

message: What is an "anti-western??"  Is it like "anti-folk music," where it's really folk music?  Upsmiler (talk) 03:45, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Perhaps an "anti-western" is a movie so bad that it helped wipe western films off the map, apparently more or less permanently. Racing Forward (talk) 20:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Anti-Western??
Talk:United States Air Force Auxiliary Civil Air Patrol

message: Um, shouldn't have discussion gone into this move, especially since it is to a title that isn't the one used by the organization in any shape or form? This isn't a proper title for this article at all. This is a featured article, after all, and the new title is, well, wrong. --OuroborosCobra (talk) 07:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:German submarine U-42 (1939)

message: Do you know how many AA guns there were? Diannaa TALK 01:42, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah. I do, It's in the existing citaiton.--White Shadows you're breaking up 01:49, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: How many guns? Just add it to the article when you know. Diannaa TALK 02:10, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: U-43 passed without this info, BTW, so I guess it is OK without the info :).  Sorry if the above post seemed a little pushy.  I was just impatient for an answer Diannaa TALK 01:37, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: No prob.--White Shadows you're breaking up 01:43, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: AA Guns

message: The text seems to alternate between U-42 and U-44.  It doesn't seem to be vandalism so is this just an editing error or did I not read it carefully enough and it was renamed? 
Oh, and one mention of U-41 too, in the opening section.  I originally took that as a reference to an earlier boat but think it might be another mistake? sjwk (talk) 07:47, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Good catch. A mysterious stranger has corrected all these errors Diannaa TALK 19:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  U-42/U-44?
Talk:Analysis (disambiguation)

message: -------
The format on the last edit by Cbdorsett needs to be corrected per the Manual of Style.  Each entry should be a sentence fragment separated by a comma, such as: 
* Neutron activation analysis, a technique used to very accurately determine the concentrations of elements in a sample
I'll give the user a chance to make the correction; if not I'll perform a revert. GridEpsilon 18:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Format

message: Is the analysis of a literary piece of work (like a poem, short story or novel) is also called "analysis", or is there another word for it? This aspect is not mentioned in the article. Adam78 11:38, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
thread_title: Is this word applied to literary pieces as well?

message: Someone should change that header, say to "see also 'Analytic'", even if for some reason Wikipedia wants to retain the two articles. Needless to say, it's the same concept. Oy.
Ndaniels 17:45, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: YES, PLEASE "confuse" this with "Analytic"
Template talk:Saskatchewan Sports

message: For the sake of condensing the wikilinks, instead of listing the Regina Cougars, Regina Rams and Saskatchewan Huskies for every sport they play, they will be listed as CIS teams at the bottom of the template. Shootmaster 44 (talk) 07:41, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Regina Rams/Saskatchewan Huskies

message: I just updated the template to reflect the fact that the team is called the Regina Thunder, not Prairie Thunder. Leafschik1967 (talk) 19:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When did they make the change? They are still referred to as the Prairie Thunder here in Saskatoon by the newspaper. So as far as I knew they were still the P-Thunder. Shootmaster 44 (talk) 05:55, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Name Change
Talk:Black Jack (horse)

message: Fixed a minor error: it said "boots and stirrups reversed".  That should be "boots reversed in the stirrups".  The stirrups themselves are not reversed. In fact, the english-type stirrups used by Black Jack (see http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/8c/BlackJackTheRiderlessHorse.jpg) can't really be 'reversed' -- they look the same front and back.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by T-bonham (talk • contribs) 16:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Thanks.  Montanabw(talk) 04:37, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: boots reversed

message: The "Comanche"- articel states:
"Comanche is often described as the sole survivor of Custer's detachment, but like so many other legends surrounding the Little Bighorn battle, this one is false. As historian Evan S. Connell writes in Son of the Morning Star:
"Comanche was reputed to be the only survivor of the Little Bighorn, but quite a few Seventh Cavalry mounts survived, probably more than one hundred, and there was even a yellow bulldog. Comanche lived on another fifteen years, and when he died, he was stuffed and to this day remains in a glass case at the University of Kansas. So, protected from moths and souvenir hunters by his humidity-controlled glass case, Comanche stands patiently, enduring generation after generation of undergraduate jokes. The other horses are gone, and the mysterious yellow bulldog is gone, which means that in a sense the legend is true. Comanche alone survived."  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.53.92.199 (talk) 20:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: one of two horses buried

message: Was Black Jack also the horse used at the Eisenhower funeral? It would fit, since he was the horse of choice for such events...but I can find no reference stating it was him. 
At the same time, in addition to being used for funerals before and after, the horse in video from the Eisenhower funeral looks suspiciously like Black Jack.
141.217.224.72 (talk) 23:34, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Eisenhower Funeral?
Talk:Theotokos of Pochayiv

message: This is usually given as 23rd July 1675. According to accounts available on the Net, the sun became eclipsed. According to NASA modelling, which is the best I can find, there was no eclipse on that date. However, there was one on the 23rd June 1675 2001:8003:E40F:9601:ED20:63A8:D7B2:E701 (talk) 06:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Date of Theotekos - are we sure?
File talk:Exercise zones.png

message: Hardly sounds very scientific or professional.  The other labels are misnomers also, for example "cardio training" applies to anaerobic training as well as aerobic, and "fitness/fat burn" applies to all the zones. --85.210.156.35 (talk) 08:06, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: "HxC training"

message: in  I have written:
I think I've spotted an error in the training zone diagram accompanying this article. 
According to the link link brianmac, a very 
professional sounding source 70% capacity means the resting heart rate plus 70% of the 
difference between the resting heart rate and the maximum heart rate; whereas the diagram 
has 70% capacity meaning just 70% of the maximum heart rate.
This means that brianmac has the aerobic zone for a 35 year old (with a 70bpm resting heart 
rate) between 153 and 163 bpm, whereas the diagram shows the aerobic zone between 130 and 
148bpm.
I am considering starting an aerobic exercise program and this makes a big difference, which 
is the correct zone to use?
please continue the discussion there.
Zfishwiki (talk) 12:35, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is there an error in this diagram?
File talk:Macfx3mockup.png

message: This screenshot might be inappropriate for Wikipedia use. E-mail spam is a growing issue on the Internet, and this screenshot reveals the e-mail addresses to several persons/institutions not directly associated with Wikipedia or the author. I find Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy inconclusive in matters such as this. Ideas?Tommy Kronkvist (talk|contribs) 08:16, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm quite sure Fredrik Henrysson wouldn't like to see his e-mail address promoted like this... 22:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I've blurred them out. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 23:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: So did i - we were, like, on top of each other (though, the addresses were still somewhat readable in yours) —Random832 23:55, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: They were fairly illegible, but I forgot to blur the one in the header. Anyway, I'm glad to see we both had the same idea. Now if only more editors knew about this problem and didn't reveal their e-mails for scouring spambots... ˉˉanetode╦╩ 23:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Talk:Washington Senators

message: I would like to see a unified article on Washington Senators baseball that merges all the hither and yon "Senators" teams that are embedded with 19th century Senators, the Minnesota Twins and Texas Rangers.  Burying their identification in those articles without fleshing them out here is icky.  I tried to show the kids in my class the Senators I grew up with and of course they thought I meant either the Twins or the Rangers.  I mean, I went to National Stadium for gosh sakes, not on a road trip!  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.228.52.118 (talk) 21:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Other References
Talk:Sengoku Jieitai: Sekigahara no Tatakai

message: I've assessed this article for WP:TV as requested here. I have rated this article as stub class because of the relatively short length and as low importance because there is little to distinguish it from other articles about television series. These categories are subjective and may be reviewed by any member of WP:TV who feels confident to do so. Please note that a more formal assessment by other editors is required to achieve good article or featured article status. I used criteria from the television wikiproject guidelines here, article about TV series guidelines here and the assessment guidelines here.--Opark 77 (talk) 10:42, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article assessment