Talk:Sanal Edamaruku

message: I have been unable to confirm any details of this alleged event in reliable sources. The only sources cited are a page on Edamarku's own organization's site and a Boing Boing story which itself only references that page. Surely a high-profile confrontation between Magic and Science that "called several hundred million people to their TV sets" would have made enough of an impact to be reported by some independent source? Pending independent confirmation, Rationalist International's account of the event and its impact must be treated with a fair amount of skepticism. Hqb (talk) 15:53, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Fixed. Several other reliable sources are in various Indian vernaculars, I think. --Relata refero (disp.) 13:15, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Great Tantra Challenge 

message: Note:  Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under :Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag  TALK2ME 15:53, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:INDIA]] Banner/Delhi Addition 

message: Um, anyone wanna update with the stuff here? http://richarddawkins.net/articles/645578-sanal-edamaruku-under-attack-for-exposing-catholic-miracle Not really in a Wikipedia-ey mood these days but this seemed rather relevant and very current. Shrumster (talk) 07:27, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent "miracle" expose and subsequent legal attacks by Indian church 

message: "did not receive any indoctrination as an anti-theist" This run on sentence is oddly phrased. It's also not clear what "indoctrination" means in the context. What is anti-theist indoctrination? --Dkriegls (talk to me!) 18:34, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I was planning to clear this article even further since it still has POV issues, I agree I found that phrase very wrong and unnecessary, like supporting him or something. I think its trying to say that no one forced him to be an atheist, anyway clean this article up if you please. -Ugog Nizdast (talk) 19:54, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Odd phrase 

message: Sources, sources, sources.
Times, first link in google.
About his father.
Randi's opinion, might be worth quoting.
The Australian.
The Hindu, but opinion piece.
Videos, external links.
Deccan Chronicle, quite recent.
another external link.
Source explains who issued the FIR and the official role of the church.
Interview with him.
Reports also the online petition.
Again, explains the FIR.
About his exile and support.
Another The Hindu article.
Hindustan Times.
His quote about SSB.
Another one on SSB
On Godmen
His take on them.
Interview.
Tehelka
Book - Atheism and Secularity
Book - Disenchanting India
-Ugog Nizdast (talk) 08:11, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good references for this article 

message: There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages. 
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion. 
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 17:59, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:   [[Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion|Request for Comments]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Sanal Edamaruku. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added  tag to http://www.rationalistinternational.net/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131224081030/http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Mumbai/Batting-for-reason-in-a-land-of-faith/Article1-851455.aspx to http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Mumbai/Batting-for-reason-in-a-land-of-faith/Article1-851455.aspx
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120308062443/http://newhumanist.org.uk/2043/board-of-trustees-and-supporters to http://newhumanist.org.uk/2043/board-of-trustees-and-supporters
*Added  tag to http://www.rationalistinternational.net/article/2008/20080310/en_1.html
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100526140706/http://www.vakilno1.com/bareacts/indianpenalcode/S295A.htm to http://www.vakilno1.com/bareacts/IndianPenalCode/S295A.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The sourced additions are largely based on the PRI broadcast audio.  has no right to remove properly-sourced additions, nor to call them synthesis. Elizium23 (talk) 01:24, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Sourced additions 

message: I don't know where the BBC enters into this. BBC has awful reporting. I based nothing on any BBC reports. Is this article based on them? They suck. I used PRI (Public Radio International). Elizium23 (talk) 01:25, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: BBC

message: Nah bro the facts are in the PRI story. It's not neutral to say "claimed" anyway, but the facts are that he did the mockery and insulting and it was reported. And everyone knew he was doing it because he was asked to apologise. Elizium23 (talk) 04:27, 8 December 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Some Catholics claimed"