lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:So Fresh

message: we need some album image artwork. no websites i know of go back more than a few years.
Does anyone have any information on the So Fresh: Christmas Songs From Past to Present CD? Zacco33 (talk) 01:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Artwork 

message: i saw an add about so fresh for autumn 07 why isnt it here?
- kozmic|sk8r 03:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: RESPONSE: There is currently a page for So Fresh Autumn 2007 now.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnimatedZebra (talk • contribs) 10:37, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  isnt there a so fresh autumn 2007? 

message: Hi all.
I'm fine with the article, but individual compilations would appear to me to fail WP:NALBUMS. They would appear to be near to advertising for each one as doesn't make a difference instead of articles in an encyclopedia.  Your thoughts?
--Shirt58 (talk) 11:13, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Individual album notability? 

message: As a collector of compilations across the world, I often check out the Wikipedia Articles to the UK Now series, German's Bravo Hits, and in Australia, the Now and So Fresh series.  I noticed some of the So Fresh Compilation links point to deleted article pages. 
If I may politely point out a couple of things - the inconsistancy in which some compilations series are listed.  The Entire Now series from the UK has every CD in the set listed, yet they are many holes in the Australia So Fresh collection - This is just the Australian equivalent to the Now Series.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/So_Fresh:_The_Hits_of_Autumn_2011
In relation to a Deletion review, I thought the following two external links can be considered.  Apparently one of the reasons why the page was deleted was because the compilation did not have a listing on allmusic.
http://www.allmusic.com/album/so-fresh-the-hits-of-autumn-2011-mw0002127903
http://www.aria.com.au/pages/aria-charts-end-of-year-charts-compilations-2011.htm
When speaking of notability, a:) So fresh is one of the longest running compilation series in Australia, and b:) with this particular volume, it is the sixth most selling compilation of 2011.
If the deletion still stands, that's fine, but if a consensus could be reached on this issue, I could fill in the missing compilation articles from the series.  I would please like to get this sorted out first, before adding pages that would potentially get deleted.    
If I could please get a heads up on this, this would be much appreciated.  Thanks  Whitewater111 (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  So Fresh and Now Compilations inconsistency of listings? 

message: where is that ? Dave Rave (talk) 20:01, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  So Country
Talk:Springtime with Roo

message: Needs rephrasing could we say "in the afterlife" or something like that? RomaC TALK 02:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  "she'll live forever even in the dead" 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Winnie the Pooh: Seasons of Giving which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 21:00, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress
Talk:Mickey, Donald, Goofy: The Three Musketeers

message: dude, where's the reception section (no pun intended), i wanna know how it was recieved.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by I am a jedi (talk • contribs) 02:19, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: not well bro lmao 2A0D:6FC0:8F6:F300:3C84:8967:601F:1154 (talk) 22:52, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Corpsing

message: Saw a link for this on the article for laughter and figured I'd better write it up, but I don't know much about original article creation, so if someone wants to tidy this up or something, feel free. --NaOH 07:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Help tidy up

message: On the IMDB trivia page for this series, they refer to the film speeding and slowing to mask the corpsing.  In fact, this bit of trivia was what led me to this article since I didn't know what they were talking about. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jhlynes (talk • contribs) 07:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  References 

message: Pretty sure this phrase comes from an incident or incidents where characters in a stage play who are supposed to be dead begin laughing. Might try to dig up (forgive the pun) a reference. 86.42.124.92 05:44, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Might be real corpses involved

message: I have also heard the phrase "you're killing it" when referring to 'unwanted' laughter in jokes. Is this related? If it has a link it should probably go in the article. --Gigitrix (talk) 22:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Any relation

message: ...you'd think that Fallon's name would be mentioned in this article as a famous, recent example of someone addicted to "corpsing". :) 199.214.26.226 (talk) 21:05, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Oh, Jesus, no!  That's such a blatant NPOV/BLP violation... (Fallon, that is)  Twin Bird (talk) 00:09, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  now that Jimmy Fallon has officially been listed as Conan O'Brien's replacement... 

message: Does anyone have a good reason? The Hero of This Nation (talk) 22:59, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why should [[corpsing]] and [[breaking character]] be separate articles? 

message: I disagree with the definition that "Corpsing is British theatrical slang for unintentionally laughing during a non-humorous performance".  It more commonly pertains to unintentionally laughing during a humorous performance that the corpsing character is not meant to have found funny.  I think this is born out by the examples.93.73.172.200 (talk) 16:23, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: I don’t think it means what you think it means
Talk:Pooh's Heffalump Halloween Movie

message: The text in the plot section of this article is really badly written. I've seen this movie, but I can't understand a word of the writing on this page. I'm gonna start editing, but help would be nice! --37.61.110.210 (talk) 08:20, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor Quality 

message: To echo the comments of the IP user above, when I arrived at this article, I too noticed that most of the plot summary was gibberish.  To that end, I've attempted to fix it.  
To 173.161.142.201: I must continue reverting your edits until the stuff you submit makes sense and finally fits in with Wikipedia's standards for quality.  This, for example, doesn't make sense: "for the very first time in the hundred acre wood Until Tigger, warns his friends about the Dreaded Evil Gobloon" nor does this: "By The Characters If He Catches Them First But Tigger tells them that if the Gobloon is captured first, before it catches them first The Gobloon will grant its captors one wish".  There are capitalization mistakes, grammatical mistakes, etc. 
We also don't need the "meanwhiles" you've added.  And the problem with "Dreaded Evil Gobloon" vs "Dreaded Gobloon" is that the only place "Dreaded Evil Gobloon" is found on the internet, is on the article page.  Not even certain "Dreaded" is part of its name.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:24, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Grammar issues and readability 

message: Please add   Category:Films about elephants
Also, please add a See also section and include the following:
* Pooh's Heffalump Movie
Thanks, Eric a.k.a.:  
71.20.250.51 (talk) 02:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 18 June 2015
Talk:The Fox and the Hound 2

message: This film is a midquel not a followup. Hello12310 (talk) 17:13, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: These two edit requests are directly conflicting.  Please provide a source that calls this either a midquel or a prequel. thank you. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 15:56, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
replies: text: In this edit, the word "midquel" comes up again, but this has been removed several times before by . Also, the Disney fandom is not a reliable source. However, I would suggest saying "intermediate follow-up" like the original film's page calls it. That makes the most sense in actual words, plus it's consistent with with the original film's article calls it. 75.106.171.139 (talk) 00:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: It has been reverted, but I noticed that the dead link in this page is an apparent repeat of a source previously used in the same section, but with a missing "f". They should be merged to fix the problem. , I'm requesting help again as this page is protected. 75.106.171.139 (talk) 19:17, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: , thank you for fixing the first film's article, but could you take a look at this film's article now please? I asked Trivialist because he/she had edited this page previously multiple times, but could you do anything else with it? This page is also protected, like the first film's, but there's a lot that could be done with the both of them, especially this one. I almost wonder if this particular page could possibly be unprotected, since it's been protected for over 13 years now. However, I'll try the requests for unprotection for that. 75.106.171.139 (talk) 19:24, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure why you're pinging me here, as I don't believe I've ever edited the article for this film. I'm happy to consider making changes as a courtesy, but I would need specific suggestions. I don't have the bandwidth right now to do my own review or go looking for sources for an article about a film I've never seen and have no interest in. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 19:35, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  already fixed the problem I pointed out, plus a few more fixes. So, I guess you don't have to help anymore for the moment. But as far as seeing this film is concerned, have you ever seen the original film, or not? Just wondering. I brought this up because of your interest in the first film's article, but for now everything's fine thanks to Trivialist and CreecregofLife. However, if you've ever seen the original film, how much does it interest you? I would recommend it, but I understand that not everyone is interested in underrated animated films. Sorry for that. 75.106.171.139 (talk) 19:44, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: This isn't the place for that kind of conversation CreecregofLife (talk) 19:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Semi-protected edit request on 27 May 2017 

message: A clumsy Old English Sheepdog who guides Copper through the city and becomes like a brother to him, He is voiced by Ving Rhames. 2001:BB6:A675:EF58:3CAE:EDD8:2046:1739 (talk) 16:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Granny Rose
Talk:Pudd'nhead Wilson

message: This link has some interesting info that might be included.  
http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1697100
24.7.106.155 07:46, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Isn't the correct name of this book The Tragedy of Pudd'nhead Wilson?
That is the title as given by Project Gutenberg, and also in the link to the full text provided at the end of the article.
If no one objects, I will make this correction.Chillowack (talk) 23:06, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Incorrect Title?

message: I've rarely seen as lame a Wikipedia article about a work of literature as this one. Yes, Pudd'nhead Wilson is an "ironic" novel, but it doesn't begin to show how deeply the irony goes. Although the injustice of the childs' swapping is righted, things don't turn out as they should, and Twain suggests that things might have been better left as they were. The politically correct 1984 film glosses over this.
The article also neglects to mention that the basic plot is obviously (???) inspired by two Savoy operas, HMS Pinafore and The Gondoliers, and possibly Il trovatore. Sherlock Holmes couldn't have been far from Twain's mind, either.
If anyone is interested, I'll re-read the novel and fix up the article. I won't do it unless I'm asked. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 13:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Well, then, sure, please do.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.23.40.34 (talk) 20:50, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: a terrible article

message: This section reads like a 7th grade book report written by a kid who is flunking English. It's not only very badly written and full of grammatical mistakes, it probably isn't really even necessary. The rest of the article is also pretty dreadful.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrCobweb (talk • contribs) 17:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Significance 

message: "F R Leavis was influential in his reassessment of the novel."
How? Where? Why?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:3902:B10A:FC58:BA14:8AB2:43A0 (talk) 17:38, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  F R Leavis
Talk:Camera lucida

message: Image :Image:Cameralucida01.jpg is not from 1807 -- the woman's clothes are from the 1830's (or possibly the end of the 1820's); see the pink outfit in :Image:1833 fashion plate.jpg... Churchh 07:59+8:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  date problem 

message: I removed the following paragraph from the section "Description":
The camera lucida that commercial comprehensive ("comp") layout artists used from the early 1950s to late 1980s, commonly known as a "Lucigraph", used lenses positioned over a platform where the original reference material (like a photo) was placed. A bellows arrangement and two cranks allowed the artist to expand or reduce the size of the image. The artist could step up and place his or her head under a shade canopy to see the image. The image was projected upward onto a sheet of glass parallel to the floor, where the artist could place a translucent sheet of white layout paper on which to draw the image or comp. The term "comp" is also used interchangeably as a short for "composition" or "composite layout". This machine provided the artist a means of quickly and accurately illustrating by employing the variable sizing abilities of the device, and for montaging sketches of photos and various visual elements into the composition. Most current computer photo editing software programs provide the same functionality as the physical "camera lucida" device, rendering it obsolete in all but individual usages.
The layout described is obviously a camera obscura and not a camera lucida. The "bellows" and the "sheet of glass" give it away beyond any doubt. It is a nice description though, and should well be included in the camera obscura article, if something similar is not already there.
--BjKa (talk) 19:28, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Camera Obscura Outtake 

message: I have just used an antique Woolaston type camera lucida for the first time, and found it extremely difficult to use. The article does point out that you can't see through the prism, and that you have to look at the edge, but the reality is that this is very awkward. The zone where you can see the far image overlaid on the paper (being in essence the extremely out-of-focus edge of the prism) is a narrow horizontal band, you don't see the whole image. To cover any appreciable area it is necessary to scan the image by moving your head forwards or backwards as you draw to keep the pencil point in view. This is tedious. I don't think I have ever seen this clarified in any description.86.187.164.26 (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title: Ease of Use
Talk:Jig

message: ...or is this article more about the tune types than the dance? This would seem to conflict with the  tag at the top of the page... — SheeEttin {T/C} 17:30, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't know that it conflicts, precisely. The tune type is intimately related to the dance, and the dab page has nothing more relevant. Still, more dance-related content would indeed be welcome. --Craig Stuntz 17:47, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Is it just me... 

message: I was puzzled coming to this article. Jigs are most associated with Ireland today, but they were also developed in England. I expected this to be a general article about the jig from the title. I do not wish to tread on anyone's toes, but either this article needs renaming, or (my preference) it needs to include other countries (even if this does make a change from all the Anglo-centric and American-centric articles on Wikipedia).--Sabrebd (talk) 01:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Hmm, it's still really Hiberno-centric. Unfortunately I don't know enough to add any info. eyeball226 (talk) 06:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: You may need to become much more embracing: - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genuine_Negro_Jig Fuficius Fango (talk) 16:20, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
thread_title: Irish Own the Jig?

message: Didn't Navy seamen fighting Napoleon dance the jig? Of course, some of them were Irish.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 17:01, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Navy sailors did the jig?
Talk:CKYE-FM

message: Some material was removed from the Red FM radio page (about a station in India) prior to moving that page to Red FM (India) and converting Red FM to a disambiguation page. The removed material relates to the Surrey, BC station CKYE-FM, which also uses the brand name Red FM. It was not NPOV, and as such would require a rewrite. Due to the fact that it has repeatedly been confused with the article (and as such rewritten) I am deleting it entirely. It will remain visible in the talk page history if anyone is interested. Thanks. --Ckatz 08:03, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Old material from the Red FM page

message: :Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *Support or *Oppose, then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
*STRONG OPPOSE - See Wikipedia:WPRS#Naming_conventions_for_stations_with_call_signs  єmarsee  • Speak up! 21:55, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Survey
Talk:Slave ship

message: See the remarkable history of the slave revolt on the Meermin: http://www.rebirth.co.za/slaves_a_failed_bid_for_freedom.htm
Also the amazing escape of the slaves on board L'Utile is documented in the French Wikipedia along with information about conditions on board French slave ships.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qetzel (talk • contribs) 21:13, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Slave revolts

message: I have the severest misgivings about the design of these slave ships. As several contributors have stated, slaves were valuable goods and profits only made on the landing of a healthy slave. These various ship plans all seem to date to the period of when the slave trade was increasingly likely to be abolished and it was necessary to present the wost possible overcrowding scenario to support that same impending abolition.AT Kunene (talk) 13:26, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slave ships 

message: I strongly suggest that we refer to slaves as the Human Beings that they were. To continue to use the word 'Slave' is to undermine the human tragedy that was caused by the need to profit on the backs of others.  Those ‘Slaves’ were people who had lives, who were treated with such horrors that nobody today could ever imagine.  Articles like these continue to dismiss the degradation imposed on them and treat the evil atrocities inflicted on nearly twenty million people as nothing! ~~Rubychung 17th of October, 2012~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubychung58 (talk • contribs) 22:11, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: You're overreacting. Nobody's dehumanizing anyone, saying slavery was a good thing, or acting like it was "nothing". The article's quite clear that the conditions they were transported in were poor. What viable alternative even exists? Things can be given fair treatment without prostrating ourselves in collective guilt. The article can use more details and sources, but there's nothing glaringly wrong like you're suggesting. --Xanzzibar (talk) 23:12, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Terminology

message: This article ONLY covers the Atlantic Slave Trade ships. They may be, to us, the most infamous and well documented but the slave trade must be at least three millennia or older and there must have been many other slave ships before hand. For example the Roman empire must have transported most of its slaves by sea and the muslim world must have transported some of its large slave population by sea. Shouldn't someone expand this article to cover these ships as well, with what we know of them?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.143.200.91 (talk) 17:41, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Atlantic Slave Trade Centric

message: Slaves were getting whipped and other slave die from being whipped 41.113.186.196 (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slave market 

message: This page can use a section on the diet of slaves and how exacly they were able to survives voyages.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Houston515 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Slave Diet
Talk:Vetri Kodi Kattu

message: There has to be disambiguation from the the song with the same title. (from padaiyappa).  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arun bit (talk • contribs) 23:33, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Disambiguation between the song 
Talk:Red FM (India)

message: This page was moved from Red FM to Red FM (India), as there are now at least five stations world-wide using the Red FM branding. The most recent is CKYE-FM, a multicultural station in the Greater Vancouver area of Canada. Information on CKYE has been repeatedly added to the Indian station's article, in a manner bordering on vandalism. Hopefully, the page move (and creation of an article for the new station) will help to protect this article. --Ckatz 08:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: If anyone knows more about the Red FM stations in India, please update the article. (Reception's no too hot here in Canada...) There is a link in the Kolkata article to a Red FM, which I've linked to here as they seem to be owned by the same company. --Ckatz 18:01, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Page move

message: There is use of peacock language in almost every line.Please change the lines or remove them.Eg.
*famous news channel
*he rules the morning 
*most exciting and happening morning 
*superb flow of Hindi.
*remains in the hearts and minds of many
*Mark and Kapil do an amazing job and one of the best packaging on radio.
Roshan baladhanvi 16:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs complete revison 

message: This page is a redirect of Suryan FM. There is no page for suryan FM. Although both are owned by the same person, there is no mentioning about the Suryan FM and its service cities.
satish 05:55, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Remove redirect & create new page 

message: W.e.f. November 2012, Red FM Now plays only Hindi songs 24 X 7 all over India.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijaysrini2807 (talk • contribs) 04:50, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Red FM, now playing Hindi Songs.
Talk:Theresa Gattung

message: Deleted the links to telecon video. Look, I don't work for Telecom or anything like it, and I think the video is funny. It'd fit under the Criticism sub-section on the Telecom page. Riverhead 08:45, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I am not sure that "business personality" is an accurate or even meaningful title. Isn't Gattung simply a businesswoman? On Twitter she calls herself "Businesswoman, Author, Philanthropist". I am not sure where she gets the philanthropist label from.Royalcourtier (talk) 19:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Business personality? 

message: I'm surprised that Gattung is rated as "low importance" given she was the first woman CEO of a major NZ company, and arguably a household name in NZ. I've taken the liberty of increasing the rating to "mid". MurielMary (talk) 11:37, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Importance rating 

message: Hi  and thanks for adding more information to this article. Can you also add citations (references) for reliable sources for this information? Unsupported information could be removed as it isn't verified. Thanks in advance. MurielMary (talk) 21:41, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Please add citations