Talk:Jessica Cutler

message: Needs to merge with Washingtonienne. Mark Richards 16:19, 20 Jun 2004 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Needs to be updated.  She never did appear in Playboy, but she did appear in Playboy.com. -- David carly 14:05, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Update

message: What is Cutler's ethnicity?
(Brazilian?  Filipino?  Sami?)
72.82.170.135 09:36, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Ethnicity

message: Should that be dropped from the external links section? -Umdunno 12:45, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: No, I think it's one of the reasons she's famous. And it's obvious what the link is, so people won't mistakenly go there. --Awiseman 13:55, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Naked Pictures

message: Anyone know? --PeterMarkSmith 07:30, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Current Whereabouts / Doings?

message: The current article says
: The Arkansas case has been dismissed for forum non conveniens.
This should include a date when the case was dismissed.  Has Steinbuch refiled the case in another jurisdiction?  Does this mean the suits against HBO and Disney have also been dismissed? Funkyj 16:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  The article currently mentions a case in Washington and one in Texas, but doesn't explain what the dropped Arkansas case was.  Maybe someone who knows something about this could clean that section up?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.252.191.212 (talk) 11:55, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Court Case

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject class rating

message: I've held off on this edit, but since she received money for sex, would it be more accurate to include "prostitute" in the opening line of the introduction?  BWH76 (talk) 16:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not trying to defend her, but I think there's lots of disagreement about that pejorative term (read Prostitute for some examples; there others, such as the explanation of "sugar daddy" in this article). Using the term could spark a lot of argument, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, but in this case probably unnecessary. I could be wrong, of course. But the lead already says "receiving money for having sex". I think that's about as obvious as you can get. I suggest letting readers reach their own conclusion. Ward3001 (talk) 02:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed.  I'm not interested in starting any arguments with this page.  To be honest, I debated placing a notability tag on this article as I kind of think that this article may be an example of WP:ONEEVENT.  The news that she may be linked to the Spitzer madame led me to hold off on that.  BWH76 (talk) 07:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: I think she achieved notability (perhaps just barely) even before Spitzer. The combination of congressional staff assistant with revelations of her sexual escapades nudged her over the edge. With the Spitzer revelation, she's definitely notable. Ward3001 (talk) 14:43, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Question