lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:Oreius

message: There has been a massive upswing in the popularity of Centaurs as player characters in role playing games since this film was relleased - due entirely to Oreius - I wonder if we cannot mention this in the article? Azezel 22:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Azezel, if this is your personal opinion, i.e. something you've personally noticed, then the answer is no. However, if you can cite this, from a reputable source, then that would be an excellent addition to the article. --Fbv65edel / ☑t / ☛c || 22:48, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: RPG

message: I don't remember seeing him turned back from stone in the movie, How could he have, Jadis broke his statue to pieces. C Teng (talk) 18:49, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Oreius restored
Talk:Elspeth Probyn

message: Removed template calling for additional verifiable citations and inline citations. Feel-flourish (talk) 13:58, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: An anonymous user from the University of Tasmania IP added that paragraph and has been making such edits persistently, lending undue weight to this point of view. Apparently the user takes issue with a single column Probyn published in The Australian in May, where she expresses an interest in studying Chinese culture. It's here if you want to read it. I don't think her column stirred up any controversy other than irking this anonymous user, and Wikipedia isn't the place to discuss whether or not there was some problem with what she wrote. I removed the section again, and I think it should stay out. Do you agree? --Grace 01:12, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Seems fine now.--Runcorn 19:15, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Was looking for information on Australian actress Maeve Dermody and out of interest I looked for this old lecturer... and she was here. Why is Elspeth Probyn on this and Maeve Dermody not? I mean, MD has way more significance in the world than some crusty old wanna-be academic. Just saying.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.189.80.86 (talk) 04:54, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Just why really?
Talk:Ralph Paffenbarger

message: Was this scientist parodied in The House of God as the running cardiologist? JFW | T@lk 21:01, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I have classified this article as a start due to its level of detail and organisation. It needs more work on its sourcing. Capitalistroadster 05:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Start classification

message: This needs to be cited, as reasonably, hundreds of publications requires about a publication every couple weeks or so for a life. ? Chris b shanks (talk) 19:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: 'Hundreds' of publications
Category talk:3D computer graphics

message: When I worked at EA, they were talking about a tech. called Parallax, it was a method of creating depth using 2d images. Does anyone know how to do this and can explain this in detail?  — [Unsigned .]
:Perhaps you mean parallax mapping? -Eekerz (talk) 01:59, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Parallax

message: This category has too many articles that need to be put in subcategories of this category. All of the OpenGL-related articles can go in :Category:OpenGL, all DirectX/3D-related articles in :Category:DirectX, etc. -Eekerz (talk) 00:13, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cleanup
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Z Games

message: This article has been re-written so it is not an advertisement.  Rather, it is an informative article, giving background on the company's history and games.  Please re-activate the article.  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.158.177.193 (talk • contribs) .
:Please go to WP:DRV.  ~a (user • talk • contribs) 22:17, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Anders Heger

message: If you quote "media"  on: he is said to be "the most powerful man" in (your?) business, you should at 
least give an inkling of reference. No wonder the vandals go berserk. Eric Haig 21:33, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Claims
Talk:William Kotzwinkle

message: The article misrepresents the novelizations he wrote, linking to the movie and miscrediting a co-author.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.216.60.136 (talk) 13:46, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  ET novels 

message: I seem to find equal numbers of references to Kotzwinkle's DOB citing 1938 and 1943 (though always November 22, in Scranton, PA, when a day and/or place are provided).  Does anyone have an authoritative, verifiable source for his year of birth, one way or the other?ShelfSkewed 21:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Year of birth 

message: Should we add refence to the movie based on his autobiographical novel Jack in the Box (eventually re-titled Book of Love)?   Maybe a paragraph about Book of Love (1990 film).  He wrote the novel it was based on and he wrote the screenplay.  Antmusic 18:42, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Should we add refence to the movie based on his autobiographical novel? 

message: Nowhere in this section: WP:Citing_IMDb does it say that IMDB is categorically unreliable. I *does* point out several types of IMDB content that is unreliable, but birthdates are not one of them. =//= Johnny Squeaky 06:47, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: was correct to revert you, especially as both birthdates have reliable sources. WP:Citing IMDb mentions several types of IMDB content that are reliable, but birthdates are not among them. - Fantr (talk) 00:32, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  IMDB as a source
Talk:Ingrid Veninger

message: The year of birth given in the article and given in by category are contradictory. NorthernThunder 21:49, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The dates given in the opening paragraph and later on for Friday the 13th: The Series are 1987-1990. These are the dates which it ran, but Ingrid Veninger only appeared in it (as different characters) in two episodes - one broadcast in 1988 and one broadcast in 1989. I wonder if the 1987-1990 is misleading as it makes it look like she had a longer run in the series and it would be better to say in 1988 and 1989? Dunarc (talk) 21:45, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Friday the 13th: The Series  dates
File talk:Oglaigh na heireann.png

message: There should be a dot above the second g in Oglaig to signify the "lost" h in Oglaigh. Furthermore, there should be a hyphen between the "h" and the first "e" in "heireann" and that letter "e" should be a capital "E" and asperated to comply with the same. See Irish_orthography#The_alphabet. Djegan 21:51, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment

message: I take it that this probably was copied from a paper for a class?  If it is not copyright, it should be better wikified, i.e. get rid of references to figures that don't exist and wikilink important aspects. Lcolson 21:52, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree.  A lot of interesting stuff in this article, but it needs a lot of re-working.  Besides the needed Wikifying I'd suggest at the very least it needs an introductory paragraph. Robotman1974 13:14, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

text: The phrase 'we had confidently expected' suggests that at least some of the material is copied straight from the original source.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.173.128.209 (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Copyright

message: #It needs a short first section providing overview.
#It needs links.
#The referenced pictures needs to be either uploaded or not mentioned.
#There are some stars in the article, referring to footnotes. The footnotes aren't there. They need to be added, or the references (stars) need to be removed.
#Reference 17 is broken.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylemech (talk • contribs) 04:32, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Wikify 

message: The article name should be changed [back] to Molten-Salt Reactor Experiment. Because this is a specific named project and facility, its name is a proper name which should be in title case. I will go to request the move. --orlady 13:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Page moved, per request. -GTBacchus(talk) 15:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Article name

message: Is there any reference for the reactor using Pu239 as fissile fuel (not only as a small impurity) ? I could not find any hint for this, more of the opposite: The first fuel was U-235, than U-233 (until 1969). The articles about cleanup show some Pu, but not much compared to U233.--Ulrich67 (talk) 09:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Was the reactor really running on Pu239 ? 
Talk:Interstate 277 (North Carolina)

message: I'm amused that it has been listed that I-277 is noted to have Inner/Outer Directions when in fact no such signs exist.  It is predominantly signed North/South with one random exception on I-77 South (Exit 9) where it lists I-277 East.  Unless someone can direct me to where there is a sign in Charlotte stating Inner/Outer, I would like to recommend removing the reference from Wikipedia. WashuOtaku (talk) 23:27, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The signs do actually exist unless I'm dreaming. Examples can be found the on-ramps for I-277 at the south-western intersection with Tryon St. (Well, if you include those side roads that form ramps). I'm trying to find picture proof but its hard. All I have is the Charlotte Observer's informal labeling of the loops of 277. I knew I should have taken a picture. I was just as shocked as you were. They have to be a new thing, because you're right it's almost all north-south. --Triadian (talk) 03:38, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Okay, I did notice the other day that the mile markers in the center of the highway say inner and outer loops.  So I can see where the loop came from now.  But beyond that, I haven't seen anything else, when I ever get some free time, I'll do a drive around I-277.  Maybe the NCDOT was saving money on the mile markers since they got a bunch for I-485; I-277 is no loop, just a half-loop.  If I find an official sign, I'll take a picture of it. Thanks for the reply.  WashuOtaku (talk) 04:37, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I hate when I'm proven wrong... NCDOT has been replacing all the signs around the Interstate with South/Inner & North/Outer signage for the last month.  So yea, odd as it seems for a half-loop interstate, but they do use inner/outer terminology.  WashuOtaku (talk) 02:27, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inner/Outer Directions
Talk:Latin Basilian

message: this article is badly confused, only the last paragraph speaks about latin Basilians. 
Most of the congregations described here are Melkite Greek Catholic Church. The monastery of Santa Maria di Grottaferrata belongs to the  Italo-Albanian Catholic Church and the Basilian Order of Saint Josaphat is Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church. --212.76.33.88 21:57, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I strongly concur. It seems as the article was for no apparent reason split of from one title Basilian monk with this strange title. Right now I'll try to bring the article about the Order of Saint Basil the Great (of Saint Josaphat) up to the status of a stub. Sadly I know next to nothing about the Melkite Church but there probably should also be separate articles about those congregations and then this article should be cleaned up. Sadly as I can see from the timestamp of the above it doesn't seem there's anyone reading this page. --Vohon 14:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rico Oller

message: This whole article seems to be written from a pro-Rico Oller point of view. For example, why is proposing abolishing Smog Check II a strong environmental record? 
- hike395 22:00, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force

message: I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
::This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
::#There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
::#It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
::#In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:17, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  removing POV tag with no active discussion per [[Template:POV]]
Talk:Kim Tai-chung

message: Hello fellow, Wikipedians.
After thorough inspection, it's been found that it wasn't Kim Tai-Chung that acted in Snuff Bottle Connection, but rather another actor with the pseudonym Tang Lung, who is of Taiwanese origin. So it would be advisable to remove any reference to the film from this page.
Sources:
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1015087/?ref_=nv_sr_srsg_0
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076699/?ref_=ttrel_rel_tt
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm3667829/?ref_=tt_cl_t_17  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.171.88.63 (talk) 14:18, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Snuff Bottle Connection problem.
Talk:Ordnance QF 20-pounder

message: I guess we have the same question here as with L7 article:
"During the Hungarian Revolution of 1956, a Soviet T-54A medium tank was driven onto the grounds of the British embassy in Budapest by the Hungarians. After a brief examination of this tank's armor and 100 mm gun, British officials decided that the 20 pounder was apparently INCAPABLE OF DEFEATING ITS FRONTAL ARMOR."
So why is this still a part of the page if it's a proven lie? We know it was capable of doing alright, it just wasn't providing _complete superiority_ over soviet tank at real battle distances. And that one is mostly affected not by armor of T-54/55, but by its CANNON. Weapon development is usually aiming for superiority with the opponent, not just "catching up". Should those lines be deleted?
37.214.74.83 (talk) 23:14, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have seen this before...
Talk:Semi-Charmed Life

message: On this page and the main page it is stated that changing the lyrics from "I want nothing else" to 'I want someting else" somehow lessens the references to drugs. However couldn't the "something else" the narrator of the song wants be drugs? This has always been my interpretation of the song. When life is difficult a person looks for something else to get through that moment, and may turn to drugs such as Crystal Meth.
ToyChristopher 19:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: That's often been my interpretation as well.  The entire section is likely, as regards tone and content, encyclopedic, but surely poorly sourced, so I'll tag it for sourcing; of course, should you find any interpretations in notable publications that we might reference (as we do in sundry other songs), you should, to be sure, feel free to rework the section. Joe 04:19, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: ''I want something else''

message: I believe the producer is NOT Colin Thurston but actually Eric Valentine. Can someone confirm this?
---- PeterHunt  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.125.233.55 (talk) 20:36, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Producer? 

message: Discrepancy between Neve 3078 and Neve 3038. Caption says one. Body of text says another. I'm not sure which it was. Does someone know?
Jeffholton (talk) 20:58, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Caption vs. body
Talk:List of Indian reserves in Alberta

message: I used  as classification. 
To do: 
*create articles for red links (even as stubs)
*link/create articles/stubs for each nation
*put treaties in context (relation to the reserves, now they speak mostly of the nations involved).
Please comment. --Qyd 17:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment

message: I just updated the list. I will return to fix the Indian reserve redlinks (most of which there are already articles for). Hwy43 (talk) 06:38, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Updated list 
Talk:Jennifer Aspen

message: this filmography needs to be put into table form, but im not sure how. i checked it out and it all looks terribly complicated. sorry to force it on someone else :) Benji64 22:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It was, aside from Rodney, all appearances as a guest star. There's no reason to list all that, so I cut it off.--Miguel Cervantes 21:52, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Filmography

message: I removed the Scientology project tag from this page as the article does not seem to fit the stated purpose of this project:
:Purpose: WikiProject Scientology (or WP:SCN for short) is meant to set a public forum for Wikipedia editors interested in improving and maintaining articles related to Scientology and the Church of Scientology, with a primary focus upon history and practices.
Toounstable (talk) 22:42, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Agreed. I just changed her birth date to 1970. 2603:6080:5D00:2562:C90D:4BC6:597:AD20 (talk) 22:06, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject Scientology?
Talk:Come Sail Away

message: I am here to provide proof that this song was covered by Card Games FTW so that User:Deconstructhis does not revert again. "Proof"  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugarh (talk • contribs) 16:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Proof

message: Should there be a mention of this song? It was covered (how notably, I'm not sure, but the album seemed to be rather popular here, especially amongst teenagers) by Eric Cartman / Trey Parker on the "Chef Aid" album. I don't know if it qualifies as a "real" cover, but shouldn't it be mentioned here, at least in passing? 180.189.138.224 (talk) 10:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Not just the album - it was also a central part of gag in season 2 episode 2 Cartman's Mom Is Still a Dirty Slut.  Once started, Cartman can't stop until he finishes.  .  Most other notable songs have a list of covers, some really obscure.  Titaniumlegs (talk) 10:20, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  This song and "Chef Aid" 

message: Should there be a mention of use in the Freaks and Geeks pilot?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.94.47.16 (talk) 22:02, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  In Popular Culture 

message: Is there a more reliable source for the claim that the song references Ezekiel 1? The source cited appears to be just some blokes blog.--81.153.39.115 (talk) 23:38, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: Good point. The connection seems tenuous, and I have removed it from the article. Ibadibam (talk) 04:42, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference to Ezekiel
Talk:Al Rajhi Bank Tower

message: The Abraj Al Bait Towers are supposed to be taller than this when finished. So why the conflicting text? The text for the building says its going to be the tallest building in Saudi Arabia. But the text for this building here says the same thing. --Ragemanchoo (talk) 12:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Abraj Al Bait Towers?

message: I'll have to figure out the copyvio tag, but this obviously culled from a press release or article.  "blah-blah", he said. is a rather obvious tip-off. Reimelt 22:32, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Obvious copyright violation

message: The Heli Pad is a copy paste from Burj Alarab's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alromaithi (talk • contribs) 22:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Burj Al Arab 
Talk:Touring the Angel

message: what ever happened to Anton Corbijn's footage? he was there filming, at least during the BCN 2nd concert: the crowd greeted him and he waved back; I expected that he was going to be the director of the new video and now I hear of someone called "Blue Leach"??? WTF...
-
They played Shake the Disease in Tallinn, not Leave in Silence.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.251.172.128 (talk) 22:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: live version

message: # Please provide reliable souces and inline citations when adding details.  There's 20+ setlists in this article, not none of them were properly sourced or cited.
# Per WP:NOT#FAQ we don't compile statistics like "Song X" was played Y times; "Album Z" had the most songs on the setlist, etc.  Nor do we include each and every setlist variation played during a tour.  If such details are to be included, they should be written in prose format.  See U2_360_Tour#Concert_setlists_and_show_themes on how to describe the diversity of songs played, without resorting to multiple lists.  Or you can keep the "standard" setlist (with reliably sources and citations) and add a prose section describing the changes throughout the tour.
--Madchester (talk) 21:00, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Tour setlists
Talk:United States Marine Corps Designated Marksman Rifle

message: Cleaned the article up some. 
El Jorge 07:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Additions & Subtractions

message: I have added the WP:MILHIST  template to the article and made a general cleanup for style, formatting, spelling and links. I have also added the formal name of the DMR (Rifle, 7.62-MM, M14, DMR) to the lead. —Squalla 00:57, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Major cleanup 

message: How did the rifle differ from the M21, which was also based on the M14? Were they simply different attempts to achieve the same goal with the same basic hardware? -Ashley Pomeroy (talk) 20:41, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Good question. I don't have a clue, but our Designated marksman and Designated marksman rifle articles both explain some of the differences between the roles and basic weapons, and how they contrast with the sniper role and weapons. Hope that helps until someone with experience comes along. - BilCat (talk) 20:52, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  M21
Talk:Maurice Blackburn

message: Roisterer - I would like to reinclude "He was a grandson of [James Blackburn] and Captain Alexander McCrae" the source is the Australian Dictionary of Biography - Online Edition. What were your reasons for removing it? --Missjeanie 22:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Armblast (Kiddy Grade)

message: I was wondering why this page was titled "Armblast" rather than "Armbrust" - this was a mistake FUNimation admit to making (unfortunately the forum post will have long been pruned) and the FUNimation DVDs themselves use the correct spelling on the 2nd subtitle track. Shiroi Hane 21:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Article title
Talk:Battle of Cheongju

message: You describe a battle where the japanese succesfully defended a fortress from a korean attack, after which the koreans succesfully tricked the japanese into believing a larger force was on the way. Thus they retreated. How come then, that the estimate losses of the japanese( 2000, as opposed to 900 korean casualties) are so high? I am sorry, but having read all the articles here about Hideyoshi's invasions of Korea, i must say that they are nearly all written from a korean-favored point of view. You need to write from a Neutral point of view. 77.250.25.165 (talk) 12:33, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Chongju, according to my book I used, is located in Chungchong province. It is about 3-4 miles northwest from the naktong river and Sangju. Is Cheongju anywhere near Chungchong province? Good friend100 01:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Casualty numbers