Talk:Sprite (folklore)

message: What is the sprite trap section talking about? Is it one of those religion-specific things, because if so it should be specified so that readers don't assume every believer in sprites captures them the same way or whatnot. Perhaps we should acribe the bottling ritual to a specific religion, or at least cite the Web page the ritual was taken from.--Teddywithfangs 01:37, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion-specific section? 

message: This article is very badly written. It's abusing my faith in the wikipedia system. I've added clean-up tags to it in an effort to improve. I don't know enough about the subject to fix what's necessary, but I fixed the spelling errors, at least. I'm going to see if there's a wiki project that might adopt this, but if not, someone fix this using proper references. I don't care if what you believe about the damned things, back up your claims with some sort of outside information, as is WP policy. Good luck, Garnet avi 23:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: All the "Bad, bad, bad...." unsourced opinions were added by 1 user in the :last few days.  I've streamlined a previous version and substituted :it.  Still needs proper source attribution, but the egregious stuff based on RPGs and random modern fiction is gone.--4.129.80.112  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.129.80.112 (talk) 00:01, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bad, bad, bad.... 

message: I feel Im in the presence of one, though it is very secretive in avoiding me, it doesnt call my name nor does it make certain movements that cant be unheard for I hear it, ignoring it is one thing but if I were to compose a trap. How would I be going about that
HereticLord 01:03, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Sprite 

message: The Sprites in popular culture article doesn't have enough info about sprites themselves to make it useful and is not big enough to interfere in any way with this article. Many other articles have the popular culture section attached to the main article.--Beligaronia (talk) 22:49, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Just because other articles are stuck like that doesn't mean this one has to be. It was split because it's fundamentally different. Mintrick (talk) 00:55, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: Consensus seems to have been reached at Talk:Sprites in popular culture. JulieSpaulding (talk) 08:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

text: # Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:30, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: Same creature, different time periods. daughter article can't stand alone I think. Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:30, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: # Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:30, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Merger proposal

message: :# Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:30, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Support

message: "Entity" is so general: Everything -- every dog and cat, water sprite, and Sprite soda -- can each be considered an entity.  I suggest this article be renamed Sprite (supernatural).  That will distinguishes the sprite of this article from all those other things.  Ciceronianclausula (talk) 16:20, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Name of article 

message: I WP:BOLDly moved Sprite (entity) to Sprite (mythology). As it requires page mover right, if anyone objects please ask and I'll revert it and open a full RM. No such user (talk) 15:46, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Please revert this article page to Sprite (entity), which was accurate, or move it to Sprite (folklore). In folkloristics, myth is a specific folklore genre that by and large doesn't apply here. :bloodofox: (talk) 15:56, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
replies: text:  – moved to Sprite (folklore), with redirects fixed. I'm obviously bothered by that "(entity)" disambig, so if anyone else disagrees... please open a RM. :) No such user (talk) 17:33, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  RM followup