lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:The Monthly Packet

message: This article was written by June Sturrock and / or Amy de Gruchy. It's a word-for-word copy of 
I'm rewriting it, rather than tagging it for deletion.
Alpha Ralpha Boulevard (talk) 22:12, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: A copyright violation

message: :founded by members of the Oxford Movement to counter Anglo-Catholic extremism
:Over time, the approach was modified: Anglo-Catholic contributions were accepted, and it became more tolerant of Roman Catholicism
This is really quite confusing. Before the emergence of Anglo-papalism, the Oxford Movement was itself the incarnation of Anglo-Catholic "extremism". How can admission of Anglo-Catholic contributions and tolerance of Roman Catholicism have been novelties introduced some time after the magazine's foundation if it was created by members of the foremost movement of Romanising Anglo-Catholics in the first place? 83.137.255.98 (talk) 09:09, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confusing article
Talk:Old Catholic Church in Italy

message: It appears that the first para of this wikipage needs to be re-worded (corrected) so as to clarify the current (post July 2011) standing of the parishes in Italy.  The church is not listed on the UofU website as being a member-church, so the statement that this is a UofU member church appears to be incorrect.  There is, however, a note on the UofU website re the 2011 changes, but (to me at any rate) it is not clear precisely what the note means.  Do the Italian parishes have a current relationship with Utrecht, or not ?  Could someone who knows the answer and who knows what the status of these parishes is, and who can cite references to support his/her info, please amend the wiki article, or post info here so that others can amend the article.  Thanks.  Diakonias (talk) 10:54, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Status of this Church regarding Union of Utrecht
Talk:Always the Sun

message: The song is actually about the UK tabloid newspaper; The Sun.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.57.101 (talk) 21:43, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Subject 

message: This nonsensical piece of information was added way back in 2011 and never seemed to bother anyone? Dire Straits had ceased to exist after the 1993 tour. Jules TH 16 (talk) 23:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Dire Straits cover"
Talk:Twin paradox/Archive 9

message: The discussion does not explain why there is a paradox. This is an important issue in the history of relativity that is being neglected. The following should be included as an external link. 72.64.37.102 17:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It does not explain why because the overwhelming consensus of scientific opinion is that the really is on paradox.  The link you provide may be useful as a source of historical data on the topic, but as an authoritative demonstration that relativity is invalid it fails to hold water.  More importantly, to the best of my knowledge it has failed to attract the kind of attention in the scientific community that would make in notable and require its inclusion in the article including a mention of its conclusion. --EMS | Talk 20:39, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Also the proposed link paper (by Ricker) seems to misrepresent Ives' exchange with McCrae (April and August, Letters to the editor, Nature 1951). Both McCrae and Ives agree on which clock (or which twin) comes back younger, they merely differ in how they explain it. Ricker suggests Ives agrees with what seems to be Ricker's own view, that the twins/clocks show the same age when reunited. I say again - a poor quality paper in a poor quality "journal". E4mmacro 03:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: No Discussion Why This Is A Paradox

message: Gscshoyru, you are a vandal. You are reverting edits before you have even had time to read them. This article is about the twin paradox. If you hover over this article trying to deny the paradox you are imposing your own opinion. This is vandilism.
The article is not here to afford the opportunity for people like you to give long discourses on what the likes of Paul Langevin has to say on the matter. (217.41.240.15 13:14, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not a vandal. Deletion of so much content should be discussed first, with people who understand what the article is about, and whether or not the content you remove really is unnecessary. Wholesale removal of content is considered vandalism. Gscshoyru 13:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

text: What most people think of as the definition of paradox is actually incorrect. A paradox is a seeming contradiction, not simply just a contradiction. It is in fact a paradox, whether or not it is a contradiction. The way that that paradox is resolved is perfectly fair game for article inclusion. Gscshoyru 13:29, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: In that case, keep the introduction factual and then open up a new section for reasons to suggest that the paradox does not exist. (217.41.240.15 13:33, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Sounds Fair to me.  Lets leave the introduction as a definition asto what the paradox IS, and move the controversial stuff to a section called "Possible Explainations", "Other Viewpoints" or something similar.  I think that will satisfy WP:NPOV without deleting relavant information to the topic.  If you want to do that, I will support it.Mdlutz 13:43, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Same. Gscshoyru 13:44, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vandalism
Talk:Wickham Steed

message: The quotation about "a dirty German-Jewish international financial attempt..." does not appear in The Times of 31 July 1914. The reference currently is to Niall Ferguson's Pity of War. In turn that refers to one of Steed's books. It does not refer to The Times.
185.122.232.207 (talk) 18:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  The Times quote
Talk:Ornaments Rubric

message: I have added material of the "some say ....; but others maintain ...." type to the second paragraph of the History and Interpretation Section.  Since no one has questioned anything here so far, I have inserted it at once, but will willingly discuss it here and any modifications if anyone has doubts.--Jpacobb (talk) 18:48, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Details of vestments
Talk:Adam Rippon

message: Rippon is interviewed by Joshua Johnson (journalist) here . Might be another reference to include. = paul2520 (talk) 14:21, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible reference 

message: Adam Rippon is a prolific choreographer for major U.S. figure skaters (maybe others, too). Can his biography be updated to include this part of his career after retiring as a skater? 50.37.240.247 (talk) 04:47, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Adam Rippon as a Choreographer 

message: Can we please talk about the fact that he was the star of Superfruit’s MV of The Promise? 114.206.74.48 (talk) 13:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: What? Bgsu98 (Talk) 19:04, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Super fruit MV
Template talk:Infobox ambulance company

message: No sure why  was added to the template... Rich Farmbrough, 16:57, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Expand

message: Hello! I'm planing on doing a bit of sandboxing in my userspace with the goal of bringing this infobox visually in-line with infobox fire department. I notice that edits to this template are fairly infrequent but if anyone has any input or suggestions, I'd be delighted to collaborate. Thanks! ~Ryan (Talk | Contributions) 18:32, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Visual Update
Talk:Robert Rosenkranz

message: This page should have headings. I will add them. And who isn't signing their posts... :| 
Separately I think the Mu Xin link is broken I believe it should be directed to the 20th c. artist and writer. However he doesn't appear to have a wikipedia page.
Thirdly I agree their are major COI problems I am going to mark it with come cleanup/deletion tags. Adrianturcato (talk) 20:12, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Talk Page Mess
Talk:Madeiran large white

message: I've changed the image, because the butterfly depicted was not Pieris wollastoni, but Pieris cheiranthi (fig 2, plate 1). I've uploaded the correct drawing of Pieris wollastoni (fig 1, plate 1) from the same source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pieris_wollastoni-PD.png. The image shown now is the right one. Peter Maas\talk 15:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong image
Talk:International Festival of the Sea, 1996

message: Considering that this was a major event, and only just over 10 years ago, I'm surprised at how sparse the information on the web is about this festival. The current IFOS website seems only to be interested in the last festival at Portsmouth in 2005 and has no real sense of history beyond that. As I was present at the 1996 festival, I'm in grave danger of slipping into original research based on untested memory. If anybody can suggest a decent source, I'd be very grateful. -- Chris j wood 15:23, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Need some better sources
Talk:Uturuncu

message: So, uh, I don't really want to remove this stuff wholesale but this:  feels like too much intricate detail for a general page on a volcano and some of the sources don't appear to support the claims. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:35, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Section on topographic data 

message: Not sure that this is a reliable source. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:15, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Frontiers
Talk:Tangail

message: The new Jamuna Bridge is mixed gauge, so shouldn't Tangail be mixed gauge also?
Tabletop (talk) 05:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: There is a mixed gauge line from the bridge all the way up to Joydebpur near Dhaka. So I think Tangail would be mixed gauge. --Ragib (talk) 05:45, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broad or Mixed gauge? 

message: Hello, Wikipedians. I have found another source from an uploaded census document about the origins of the name. It's quite similar with the current resource. Kindly check if this can be used. Thanks! 
Link- http://203.112.218.65:8008/WebTestApplication/userfiles/Image/PopCen2011/C_Tangail.pdf
Wjddml (talk) 01:09, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Etymology 

message: English 37.111.195.49 (talk) 12:38, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  How did Tangail get its name? 

message: How 37.111.195.49 (talk) 12:43, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  how did Tangail gets it name
Talk:Biak dark crow

message: Hi, I'm not a wikipedia editor, just a bug nerd, so I'm not sure how to go about suggesting changes... but can someone fix this article? It's supposed to be about a species of butterfly but instead it seems to be a child's creative writing assignment about birds. 2601:601:A481:4E0:510E:D42B:5D9F:7E41 (talk) 08:02, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  What is going on with this article?
Talk:Sylvia Telles

message: in the article about the song Dindi its written that the source for the song title was a farm, and not the singer nickname. Which version is true? --Ritai (talk) 07:51, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: In the Portuguese article it says: "Contrary to what many people think, the song was not composed for Sylvia Telles, neither for any other person. "Dindi" was the name of a place near  São Jose do Vale do Rio Preto, where Tom Jobim and Vinicius De Moraes used to go... This story is confirmed by Helena Jobim, sister of the composer, in her book" --Ritai (talk) 08:09, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Dindi
Talk:Nemesis (Star Trek: Voyager)

message: I'm in severe disagreement for how we've decided to classify the "uncommon" synonyms. I don't believe they are uncommon in any sense of the word, as people use these variations commonly in everyday life. Words such as clash pertaining to fighting or "sharp" pertaining to quick-thought (intelligence) are so heavily integrated in our common-speech that if someone were to substitute these words for the more "common" words which have been outlined, no notice or thought would be needed to understand what is implied. Thus, I'm going to slightly alter how we've classified this section. 74.12.7.107 15:40, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: The most insightful episode of all Star Treks, my all time favorite. It really shocked me when I first saw it... usually, Star Trek is superficial, pseudo-moralistic, light entertainment but this one was something else... very relevant  to current events and human nature --Autismal (talk) 19:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Insightful
Talk:Magou

message: Publications such as: 
* Vane-Wright, R.I, & de Jong, R. (2003). The butterflies of Sulawesi: annotated checklist for a critical island fauna. Zoologische Verhandelingen, 343, 3–267 https://repository.naturalis.nl/pub/220217/ (page 223) 
refer to this insect as the 'Magou Crow' not merely the 'Magou'. One doesn't have a page for the Siberian Tiger at 'Siberian'. In this same manner having the page at 'Magou' seems very odd Metacladistics (talk) 12:17, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  This article should be moved/re-named to 'Magou Crow'
Talk:Joseph Mount

message: This article should be merged with the article Metronomy --Bardcom (talk) 12:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Merge

message: I have no real idea how to edit this properly, but someone might like to correct/expand the reference to Mount's NME award - this award never existed, and is a (deliberately comical) fabrication by Mount himself. Ref: http://racheld83.wordpress.com/2010/01/24/metronomy-grand-designs/ and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyoekmxwsJg  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.192.15.9 (talk) 03:44, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Friendliest Man Award
Talk:Morgan Bible

message: I've always seen this referred to as the Maciejowski Bible, and 2 of the 3 external links agree.  I've added an AKA, although I expect that some high level player in the Wikipediea MMORPG will earn a Pedant Point by removing it. Rogerborg 15:52, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Actually quite a good addition. We already had the redirect Maciejowski Bible. I've seen it both ways and both ways need to be mentioned. The people who currently own it call it the Morgan Bible,  which is why we have it under that name. (see Wikipedia:Naming conventions (manuscript names)). Dsmdgold 01:47, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It was in the article anyway, if he'd read to the end. Johnbod 02:54, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: So I see. Alternate names should be very early in the article, so I have moved them up. Dsmdgold 12:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  aka Maciejowski Bible 

message: The article states the number is 44 but the linked sources speak of at least 46 folios. 62.72.87.2 (talk) 10:56, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Number of folios
Talk:Paroxysmal Atrial Tachycardia

message: The article "Paroxysmal atrial tachycardia" is a requested medical article. It should only be redirected to "Supraventricular tachycardia". 
While creating the article "Paroxysmal atrial tachycardia" , I didn't pay due attention and clicked on the wrong button. Instead of "Redirect", I clicked on "Internal link". Now the article is marked for speedy deletion.
However, insteasd of deletion, the article "Paroxysmal atrial tachycardia" should be redirected to "Supraventricular tachycardia" which is the proper medical name for this condition. The article "Supraventricular tachycardia" already exists.
--Dara Koper 15:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Fredia Gibbs

message: As this article stands, it does not conform to the Wikipedia guidelines on Neutral Point of View. Words and phrases like "stellar" and "mean looking kick and an incredibly toned body" are not encyclopedic. Much of this seems to be autobiography, which can be problematic. A review of the Neutral Point of View tutorial might be helpful. --Moonriddengirl 16:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: These have been remedied, so the tag has been removed. --Creashin 03:38, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Neutral Point of View

message: Multiple editions have been made which appear to suggest that the subject herself maybe writing the article as the additions are written from a first person point of view.  While this is not vandalism, I do have concern that it is non-verifiable and may not represent a NPOV. I have therefore reverted to last version by Creashin.  I will appreciate others' comments if they think I have been too harsh. --Nuttycoconut 04:20, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Autobiographical? 

message: There are edits on this page from a user who I followed from Special:History/Grim Sleeper. I believe it’s the MAC address ending in c3b4. Can anyone help me verify and confirm any of the information included in the recent edits? I’m not Wikipedia literate but I thought it important to bring to reader’s/editor’s attentions! 72.135.229.13 (talk) 09:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Fraud on this Page
Category talk:History of Jerusalem

message: Please see related discussion at 
*Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Edit warring and POV pushing Category:Jerusalem. --Timeshifter 06:50, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Discussion is now archived here: . It lists many examples of this still-ongoing POV campaign. --Timeshifter 17:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

text: I don't understand what you are asking. Can you elaborate? --Timeshifter 17:56, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:ANI]] 

message: When people go to the categories below, how can they understand any of those topics without studying the history of Jerusalem? 
*:Category:Crusades
*:Category:Ancient Israel and Judah
*:Category:Arab-Israeli conflict
*:Category:Israeli-Palestinian conflict 
Isarig has removed these additional categories, and the previous ones I listed, several times. Here is the last diff  .
Isarig, please answer my question, and engage in discussion on this talk page. I don't understand why any of these additional categories are at all controversial. --Timeshifter 15:49, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Additional relevant categories
Talk:Mamelodi

message: Who are the key people in the community of mamelodi 41.216.201.162 (talk) 17:22, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Community profile  

message: main problem 154.117.141.150 (talk) 06:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Interesting 41.115.88.107 (talk) 19:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

text: The government is not working properly 41.115.88.107 (talk) 19:13, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Geographical problem about load shedding in Mamelodi
Talk:Planet Patrol/Old Discussions 1

message: Planet Patrol was an Electro Group, not a TV show.
Jclf19k 06:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

message: * To date they are about to release a brand new single "LONG LIVE FREESTYLE" under there new name [PLANET PATROL III]. Herb Jackson say's it will be the anthem to speak for and save Freestyle music! Log onto: www.myspace.com/therealplanetpatrol to hear and learn more about P.P.
* After 23 years [PLANET PATROL] Has Been Revived! Thanks to Bill Foster WILd-O Productions and Alan Beck & J.D. of The Pacific Entertainment Group, Planet Patrol is presently in the Studio. There in the Process of Recording a New CD some time in 2007 or later this year. Which will be title: "THE CHALLENGE". There still working hard to bring the Electro funk & Freestyle music sound back into the 21st Century. And also with some more flavour and twist of today Sound & in the Hip hop culture.
* There working with the help of alot of DeeJay's, Dancer's and Tour's and Fan's giving them support. They been active going from West Coast and East Coast and getting blessed by there FAN's again. And Also by there Fan's around the World.
* Current Founder & Group Leader in 2007: Herb Jackson a.k.a. Luv Bug Andre DuBose a.k.a. Dre' Devine and Sonny Thompson a.k.a. Hazel Eyez
WEB PAGE: www.myspace.com/therealplanetpatrol 
E-mail: planetpatrol3@yahoo.com 
--DJFLEX-mk2 11:44, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Presently
Talk:Race of Champions (modified racing)

message: - I will soon add material from Stock Car Racing Magazine and other sources.  I note that the past-winners footnote no longer links to a valid page, as the Race of Champions website exists but gives a 404 Not Found error for the linked page, as of 13 July 2015.  (Mike Barno, not logged in)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:DFC0:26:1D1C:C6BF:53AF:E46F (talk) 21:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Charters and Caldicott

message: :Image:Lady Vanishes shootout.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
— Save_Us_229 21:31, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Lady Vanishes shootout.JPG

message: Unless the subject is brought up in any of the films or programs, how can it be assumed?  Kostaki mou (talk) 21:25, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Religion
Talk:Nazareth Academy (Rochester, New York)

message: This is a start on your school article. Further advice is available at the school project page.
1. Add some topics (like history, notable alumni, etc)
2. Keep adding references
3. Add pictures
4. Ask for an assessment at the schools project.
EagleFan 16:24, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assess
Talk:Edgbaston High School

message: i go to ehs. this is id say one of the best schools in britian  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.108.150 (talk) 15:13, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  

message: Edgbaston High School continues to acheive outstanding reports from Ofsted.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.211.59.108 (talk) 17:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ofsted 