Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Skiing and Snowboarding

message: Dear skiing experts:  I tried to tone down this rather promotional article, but I don't know whether the section about promodels is appropriate because I don't know what they are.  Can someone please take a look?—Anne Delong (talk) 12:03, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Seth Morrison (skier)]] - is the section on "Promodels" appropriate? 

message: Is this project intended to include cross-country skiing in its scope? If so, the reference to going up and down mountains is limiting. Therefore, I would recommend, instead of "This includes the companies, mountains, and athletes. Everybody is welcome to join, no matter how you get down the mountain in one or two planks (or up)." This includes the manufacturers of ski and snowboard equipment, alpine and cross-country skiing venues, and notable athletes, who participate in the various forms of skiing and snowboarding. Everybody is welcome to join, no matter what snow-covered terrain you traverse and how you do it. User:HopsonRoad 14:29, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cross-country skiing? 

message: Dear snowboarding experts:  This fellow set a speed record.  Is this enough to make him notable?  Most of the news reports are about that.—Anne Delong (talk) 02:27, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft:Edmond Plawczyk]] 

message: The current season has been moved per discussion, which I find reasonable per other winter sport seasons. Probably all other season articles should be moved in the same manner. Opinions? --Tone 07:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  2016–17 Alpine Skiing World Cup 

message: Section Medals by country
It is wrong because there should be 144 total gold medals (178 if you include olympic games that are also world championship) for men
And it is also a wrong number for womens medals and total.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antonio111222333 (talk • contribs) 00:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIS Alpine World Ski Championships 

message: Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Ski jumping#Before another bot reverts my changes. A permalink for it is here. It concerns mass deletions by an IP. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 12:55, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Mass deletions at the [[Ski jumping]] article 

message: FYI, I've gotten two new images of ye-old-timey skiing uploaded (skiing before alpine and nordic split in two)
*:File:Skiers on Mount Royal - MONTREAL - Skieurs sur le Mont Royal.jpg (1920s)
*:File:Canadian Sports Series - Skiing on Mount Royal.jpg (1904)
-- 70.51.200.162 (talk) 15:38, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: New images of old skiing

message: An RFC has recently been started regarding a potential change to the notability guidelines for sportspeople. Please join in the conversation. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 23:09, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
thread_title: RFC on sports notability

message: Hello all. In an effort to finally resolve the never-ending and annoying GNG v SSG issue, I've proposed a revision of the NSPORTS introduction. You are all invited to take part in the discussion. Thank you. Jack | talk page 06:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discussion at NSPORTS 

message: Now that Parallel slalom and Parallel giant slalom / Parallel Giant Slalom are being contested in the FIS Alpine Skiing World Cup as well as the FIS Snowboard World Cup, it is perhaps time to have actual articles about them, rather than redirecting readers to other pages.
When created, the pages originally redirected to the pages for their mother disciplines (i.e. Slalom skiing and Giant slalom). But, over the past few years, these redirects have been changed multiple times to point towards various pages specifically about snowboarding.
The past couple of days, I have changed the redirects back to pointing to the pages for their mother disciplines. But, this is not ideal as these pages only talk about the "normal" version - they do not have sections about the parallel version.
The ideal soloution would be to do away with the redirects altogether and have actual articles about the parallel disciplines.
I am not knowledgable about Alpine skiing to write them myself. So, would anybody else like to take up the mantle?
109.156.104.150 (talk) 09:22, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Parallel Slalom and Parallel Giant Slalom pages 

message: In 2010 the super combined replaced the combined in the Olympics. Below are some articles that could be renamed:
Alpine skiing at the 2010 Winter Olympics – Women's combined, Alpine skiing at the 2010 Winter Olympics – Men's combined, Alpine skiing at the 2014 Winter Olympics – Women's combined, Alpine skiing at the 2018 Winter Olympics – Men's combined.
Maybe the titles might be renamed Alpine skiing at the 2010 Winter Olympics – Women's super combined for instance. Mobile mundo (talk) 13:49, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Possible renames Super Combined 

message: Hey there Project Skiing and Snowboarding!
On my sandbox is the 2018-19 Women's Downhill standings but in the motorsport format template. I would like to know if anyone likes it and if it's a viable way to display the standings as with the current format, you only see the top 5 in each discipline.
Again, I'm just asking for an opinion from someone who edits winter sport pages regularly (while I'm a motorsport editor, I am a winter sports enthusiast as well).
Many thanks,
RallyXEditor (talk) 18:48, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Idea for formatting FIS World Cup standings 

message: A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.
:– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  A new newsletter directory is out! 

message: Hi. Can't find any SR criteria regarding skiing or para-skiing.  Can anyone guide me as to where I might find these?  There is nothing over at WP:NSPORTS.Onel5969 TT me 16:13, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Hey, Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline works in these cases. Pelmeen10 (talk) 18:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Notability 

message: Hello skiing enthusiasts!  Here's a draft article that you may wish to review or improve.—Anne Delong (talk) 07:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft:Brian McLaughlin (skier)]] 

message: Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Request for information on WP1.0 web tool 

message: Hello ski experts.  This draft is about a competitive skier at the Junior level.  It appears that she has set a record, but I don't know much about skiing events, so I am reporting here for the opinion of someone more knowledgeable.—Anne Delong (talk) 15:29, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft:Catherine Carle]] 

message: Hi! My colleagues and I have been at the 2020 Winter Youth Olympics as accreditated photographers for Wikipedia and the Wikimedia projects. I do not just want to make you excited for our photos (about 3,500 are already uploaded to :c:Category:2020 Winter Youth Olympics) but I wanted to let you know, that we also made some connections with sports functionaries there.
I made contact with the CEO of the International Ski Mountaineering Foundation which is based in Mondovì, Italy, and told him about the current status of the articles whose content and photos still can be improved. The communication department reached out to me that they are very interested in supporting us. Maybe they can get us access to some sources and accreditations for their events.
Is anyone of you focused on these sports and interested in getting connected? I am afraid that I cannot keep track much of this because I am more focused on summer sports and based in Germany. I'm looking forward to your responses. :-)  Pinged as main authors of the English Wikipedia article. Best, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:01, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what you are suggesting with this post, DerHexer. Are you suggesting that there be a new article on some aspect of this topic? Is there new imagery available through Wikimedia? Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 23:24, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  As I don't know the current status of the articles in the area of Ski Mountaineering very well, I was thinking about getting access to some of their resources (literature, essays, etc) as well as contents (photos, and so on). If someone from this group is an active sports photographer for Wikimedia Commons or living close to the regions of one of the upcoming events of the International Ski Mountaineering Foundation (like World Championships and such), we could ask them for accreditations for that. They seemed to be open to help us create and improve content about Ski Mountaineering in the Wikimedia projects. Does that make sense to you? Best, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:27, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
replies: text:  Thank you for your interest in these topics. I see two autonomous tracks, 1) an inspection of the ski mountaineering article to identify elements that could be strengthened. These should be discussed here and at Talk:Ski mountaineering and 2) any new trove of images that photographers are willing to post in Wikimedia Commons and categorizing them in wikimedia:Category:Ski mountaineering. If there are new images that support the related articles, then notice can be made here. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 02:51, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Contacts to the International Ski Mountaineering Foundation 

message: Hey all, I hope everyone is safe and healthy. My name is HickoryOughtShirt?4 and I'm a member of WikiProject Ice Hockey. I was wondering if there was any interest in starting a WikiProject Sports channel on Discord? There's quite a few of us who are interested in sports, and I think it would be a good idea to help the WikiProject recruit more members. You guys can join us through here.HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:03, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discord 

message: Hello - My father, Robert K. Brinton, was an early ski mountaineer and climber in southern California and was active in the 1930s. My sister and I are in the process of trying to get an article approved on his ski mountaineering and climbing exploits in southern California (Tahquitz), the Whitney area and Whitney Russell Pass, as well as elsewhere in the Western US, Wisconsin, and British Columbia. Perhaps most relevant to your WikiProject are the following: (1) he helped to found the Ski Mountaineers section of the Angeles Chapter of the Sierra Club and named its newsletter the Mugelnoos; (2) together with several ski mountaineering companions he climbed to the top of Whitney Pass by ski (April '37), was among the first to cross the Sierras by ski over the Whitney Russell Pass (May '38), and made a first winter ascent of Banner Peak by ski (March '39). The latter two feats were featured in the LA Times as front-page news. 
I'm told that you might be able to help expedite approval of this page. I realize there is a conflict of interest since the article pertains to my father but he died in 1996 so he does not stand to benefit from the article in any way, nor do we. We have made every effort to carefully document what we have written with neutral, verifiable sources. We also have access to some quite interesting photos from the era (which we have not yet uploaded) as my father was an accomplished photographer and documented both the climbs and his fellow climbers (Glen Dawson was a close friend and climbing buddy). Please let me know if there is any interest on the part of your project in what we have written. Thanks in advance. Donna Dmbrinton (talk) 20:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Draft Robert K. Brinton (mountaineer) 

message: Hello. I kindly ask if any project members were interested in creating articles to populate this category and its relative subcategories? --Kasper2006 (talk) 06:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: [[:Category:Nations at the FIS Alpine World Ski Championships]]

message: Timberline Lodge ski area recently announced that the former Summit Ski Area, which they have owned for several years, is now called Summit Pass and is now part of Timberline (skiable on the same lift ticket).
I'm wondering what you guys think is the correct way to handle this situation. I have already moved the page for Summit to Summit Pass (Oregon), created a redirect page at Summit Ski Area, and updated the name at the List of ski areas and resorts in the United States and Template:Oregon Ski Areas.
But at this point, I'm wondering if the article for Summit Pass should be deleted and its content merged with Timberline Lodge ski area. On the one hand, some separate areas/mountains within larger ski resorts do have their own articles, e.g. Alpental or the four ski areas of Aspen/Snowmass — especially when the areas are non-contiguous, as is currently the case with Summit Pass and Timberline (although a gondola connecting the two has been proposed). And as the oldest ski area in the Northwest, Summit Pass does have quite a bit of history of its own. On the other hand, it's no longer an independent business entity and thus might not be considered notable enough to have its own article. Certainly, it wouldn't have one if it had always been part of Timberline.
Thoughts?
Charolastra charolo (talk) 20:31, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  What happens when one ski area becomes part of another? 

message: Editors may have some suggestions on how to resolve the discussion to date at Talk:Cross-country skiing (sport)#Move to: Cross-country ski competition? Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 21:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Move discussion at Talk:Cross-country skiing (sport) 

message: A user is pledging to remove the podium count in the ski world cup, claiming that no medals are awarded. But the fact that the template that bears medal in the name is used does not mean that there is no need to count the podiums, as for example the FIS website does. --Kasper2006 (talk) 12:16, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Indeed, they shouldn't be in the medals section of the infobox, since no medals are awarded. Medals are awarded in championships (Olympics, World, Juniors). World Cup podiums are listed in tables on the athlete's pages, and that is enough. Not everything needs to go in the infobox. --Marbe166 (talk) 12:24, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  We understood this, also because I had already said it myself. I explained to you the fact that the template bears the wording “Medal” does not mean that it cannot be used to count the podiums as for example the FIS website. --Kasper2006 (talk) 12:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  It means exactly that, the template should only be used for medal-giving competitions. --Marbe166 (talk) 12:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  I'm asking you to please wait for more opinions before continuing to delete what has existed for years in countless skies' biographies, and even in the German Wikipedia. --Kasper2006 (talk) 12:32, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
replies: text:  The German wikipedia doesn't matter here, this is the English one. So far, you seem to be the only one having a problem. It has not existed for years in countless skier's biographies, it has existed in a few skier's biographies. The infoboxes shouldn't overflow with information, then there would be nothing left for the articles themselves... --Marbe166 (talk) 12:38, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

text: I get it, but me and two others are a few to be considered a whole community. Let's try to put the question to a wider audience. --Kasper2006 (talk) 17:22, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: Podium count

message: I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like
*John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
* John Smith "" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from ,  and .
The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.
Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.
-  Headbomb {t · c · p · b}
This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  User script to detect unreliable sources 

message: The ski resort article uses the term, "ski area" throughout, and distinguishes the town from the terrain on which one skis. Until today, ski area was a redirect to "ski resort". It has no references. It appears that the new article arose with no discussion in this forum. This is to initiate that discussion.
In 2013, the US Forest Service expanded the definition of a "ski area" beyond alpine and nordic skiing to include other snow sports, including snowboarding to read, "Ski area – a site and associated facilities that has been primarily developed for alpine or Nordic skiing and other snow sports, but may also include, in appropriate circumstances, facilities necessary for other seasonal or year-round natural resource-based recreation activities, provided that a preponderance of revenue generated by the ski area derives from the sale of alpine and Nordic ski area passes and lift tickets, revenue from alpine, Nordic, and other snow sport instruction, and gross revenue from ancillary facilities that support alpine or Nordic skiing and other snow sports."
Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 22:07, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  "Ski area" changed from redirect into an article – Is this the right approach? 

message: Discussion. --Kasper2006 (talk) 17:08, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: World Cup race podiums in Infobox of the alpine skiers

message: Would some members of this WikiProject mind taking a look at :Tyrol Basin and assessing it? There's lots of unsourced content in the article and it seems to have a bit of :WP:NOTGUIDE feel to it. I recently did some basic MOS cleanup to try and improve the style of the article, but these were all reverted by a new editor named . I reverted back and posted something on both the article's talk page and the user's talk page to explain why, but perhaps some others might take a look as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:40, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tyrol Basin 

message: Now we have this article. --Kasper2006 (talk) 05:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Switzerland national alpine ski team]]

message: IMO the assessment table is one of the few must-be things on the main page. It does not take much space and is basically a good summary of the project, so doesn't need a seperate page for it. Tasks or to-do list is too long to be in the main page, and also the template/infobox section. Pelmeen10 (talk) 04:08, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: @Pelmeen10 I plan to add more assessment guidelines on the subpage, but the table can be added to both pages. The length of the tasks can be reduced after some evaluation. VarietyEditor (talk) 04:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Do you mind if I go through the ski areas and modify the article qualities? @VarietyEditor currently there are plenty of decent articles for ski areas that are ranked as like start class or c class... I'll be comparing them to Appi Kogen Ski Resort which we have as B class. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 20:56, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: Of course! Anybody can change the qualities, ideally we would follow the Wikipedia guidelines. Learn more about the process here. One issue I found with ski area articles specifically is that many are not rated at all, and some are not even tagged with the project banner. VarietyEditor (talk) 21:18, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

text: WP:RATER would almost do the job for you. Pelmeen10 (talk) 21:42, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Main project page 

message: I should begin by noting that I'm happy to see this project has been picked back up and is again active.  I've been operating on the fringes of it since the 2010 Vancouver Olympics, when I noticed that only the most recent five years of Alpine Skiing World Cup results had podium lists for the season in the articles and went back to 1967 and started adding them; someone else finished that project after I got to the late 1990s by myself. It helped that I do remember the sport going back to when the FIS World Cup started (and then when Bob Beattie and most of the U.S. (including me, I'm afraid) abandoned it in favor of the World Pro Ski Tour, which ultimately led to the World Cup becoming fully professional after a bitter battle between FIS and the IOC, culminating with the 1984 Winter Olympics).  
But during the pandemic in 2020, I got back into it with regard to the individual discipline pages for both men and women, which I wanted to advance enough to prevent their deletion under WP:NOTSTATS (as happened to the 2016 & 2017 individual discipline pages, which I wasn't involved with).  And since then, we've kept the individual pages going forward successfully with no requests for deletion.  Then this year, thanks largely to Kasper2006 for the initial efforts, which I then followed up on, we have moved those individual discipline pages backward to 2016, so there is a page for either sex and each discipline (downhill, Super-G, giant slalom, slalom, combined, and parallel) for every year that it has been competed as a separate discipline from 2016 to 2023 (eight years in total).  Unfortunately, I'm out of time to do any more of the prior years for the next six months, in part because my daughter and son-in-law just had another grandchild (yea!) and in part because I want to make sure that I standardize all the recent years and fix errors on some of the older pages of this type.  
If anyone else wants to create and work on these pages for the earlier years, the format should be similar to the 2016 pages.  I've limited the lists for years going backward to the top 25 and ties -- basically only the people who were (or would have been) eligible to compete in the World Cup finals (my criterion was that I didn't want to show anyone not eligible, but there could be more than 25 in case of ties or people using their status as 500+ pointers and ending up 26th or 27th, like Mikaela Shiffrin in downhill last year).  And I'm not an administrator or other bureaucrat here, but if you want to avoid disputes over WP:NOTSTATS with editors who don't want these articles in Wikipedia (and we have more than a few of those), here's a piece of advice taken straight from the Wiki instructions pages: "articles with statistics should include explanatory text providing context".  That means adding links to at least a couple of articles from reliable sources, generally pertaining to the battle for the season championship, along with descriptions of the situation. And, to anyone choosing to do this, have fun! -- AyaK (talk) 06:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
replies: text: First of all, best wishes for your little nephew, I hope that my children (26 and 24) will soon do so too  Thanks for the certificate of esteem and I pledge to help you complete the entries when I have more free time, perhaps for example this summer. Kasper2006 (talk) 09:53, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  FIS Alpine Skiing World Cup individual discipline pages 

message: Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a  parameter to , which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.
No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to , and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.
However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass  a new  parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Project-independent quality assessments 

message: I have just created the guidelines page. In order to develop it, we would need to discuss the best advice to add. Also we need to figure out standard article structures for a variety of topics, as well as how to implement templates. Thoughts? VarietyEditor (talk) 04:34, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Creating guidelines 

message: FYI, the article Caledon Ski Club has been proposed for deletion (WP:PROD). The first sentences summarize the subject this way:
*
The nominator wrote this summary of their concerns:
*
If you agree or disagree with deletion, there are instructions on the deletion notice for what to do.
Thanks,
--A. B. (talk • contribs  •  global count) 20:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed for deletion (PROD): [[Caledon Ski Club]] 

message: I thought this was a done deal back in this 2022 RFC but obviously not. A handful of editors did another rfc with no sports projects input at all. And it's being challenged because we just noticed it. This could affect almost every single tennis and Olympic article we have, and goodness know how many other sports. Some may have already been moved it you weren't watching the article. And not just the article titles will be affected but all the player bios that link to the articles. Sure the links would be piped to the right place if thousands of articles moved, but if the wording in a bio still said 2023 Wimbledon Championships – Men's singles or Swimming at the 2020 Summer Olympics – Men's 200 metre backstroke that would likely need to be changed by hand. There is also talk of removing the ndash completely.
Perhaps this is what sports projects want and perhaps not. Either way I certainly don't want projects ill-informed as the last RfC was handled. Express your thoughts at  the following rfc. Fyunck(click) (talk) 21:04, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters#RfC_on_capitalization_after_a_colon_or_dash|Major RfC on capitalization]] of all our articles 

message: There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Breuil-Cervinia#Requested move 9 February 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Pilaz (talk) 12:40, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move at [[Talk:Breuil-Cervinia#Requested move 9 February 2024]] 

message: This article was moved to the draft namespace a while ago because it was underdeveloped. However, User:Bermicourt improved it, so I just have one question: Is this article worthy enough to be moved to the main article namespace? Thanks, TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 17:34, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
replies: text: Looks like it has been moved ~Kvng (talk) 14:01, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Draft:Ski route]] 

message: Winter Olympic Games has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:55, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
thread_title:  Good article reassessment for [[Winter Olympic Games]]