lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:UEFA Euro 2000

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 06:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:20 to 1: Tears and Tantrums

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 06:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 

message: The individual episode articles for 20 to 1 are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines.  Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:20 to 1#Episode review. Thanks. -- Ned Scott 04:42, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  episode article review notice
Talk:21 (The Paddingtons song)

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 06:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Someone removed it. --NormalAsylum (t) 05:36, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:Zuheir Mohsen

message: How could Zuheir be identified as a Palestinian, if he himself claimed that this term is an invention?
I think that this should be corrected. --Nadav S (talk) 21:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't really know that -- there's no necessary logical contradiction in using it as a geographical term, while denying that it forms the basis of a valid distinct national identity... AnonMoos (talk) 11:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Palestinian who doesn't believe Palestinians exist? 

message: I shortened the unstructured and misleading essay making up most of the article (). To be clear:
*The National Command is the the leadership of the Pan-Arab Ba'ath Party. in which Syrians, Palestinians, Lebanese, North Africans, Iraqis, etc. may be members. To use the term 'Syrian Ba'ath Party' is incorrect. The leadership of the Syrian Region is the Regional Command. In theory the National Command is the supreme body of the Ba'ath Party, in reality the Syrian Regional Command is the more powerful body.
*Mohsen's view were not 'unique' as previously stated in the article. He was a pan-Arab nationalist, Ba'athist, and was by no means the only Palestinian to hold this view. Both of the two major factions of the Ba'ath Party have Palestinian wings, each one with a front organization in PLO (Saiqa and ALF). --Soman (talk) 20:49, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Weeding material
Talk:Dadhichi

message: Hello,
I had gone through this article a while back and found it to be lacking encyclopaediac structure and proper referencing. Also, it seemed to portray only one of the many accepted views on the topic. I have rewritten and expanded this article and made it complete to the best of my knowledge. I look forward to a further expansion on this topic from people more knowledgeable than me. Manoj Prajwal (talk) 17:41, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: The article is still start class, I have reassessed. It does not meet the criteria for C-Class yet, so assigning B-Class was incorrect. The referencing needs to be improved - exclude blogs and random websites and only use reliable sources.-SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 05:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Re-written article 
Talk:Emmanuel Has Come

message: note to all 
the link at the end of the page has expired. can anyone relink it??
Blackangel25 (talk) 17:18, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  expired link 
Talk:50 to a Pound

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 07:01, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:Gheorghe Marinescu

message: There's something VERY wrong with the following statement, because syringomyelia is a disorder relating to the spine, and does not affect the skin:
*Marinescu's hand, a cold blue oedematous hand with lividity of the skin seen in neurological lesions such as syringomyelia.
Matthew 1130 13:19, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Aaron Smith (DJ)

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 07:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:Greek architecture

message: Apart from the rubbish added in October-November, this article is just a copy of the architecture section of Art in ancient Greece, and I have redirected it accordingly. Adam 07:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: It's a good start heading towards a 'B' if it had a bibliography, external links, see also's etc. With inline cites and a copyedit we'd have a GA --Mcginnly | Natter 13:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment notes
Talk:Afu-Ra

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 07:30, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:Redbone Coonhound

message: I have merged some content from Redbone Hound. There may be errors. --Gray Porpoisecetaceans have large brains 21:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge 

message: Photos illustrating this page supposedly show Redbone Coonhounds.
The standard allows a 'dark nose' but these are all black nosed.
A better choice of illustrations should be made.
184.5.126.188 (talk) 01:09, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
replies: text: The photos ARE purebred Redbones. "Dark" can be interpreted as "black or dark brown" since black is a dark color--and in any case, the standard says "a black nose is preferred". The pictures are also the best available on Commons. If you have better ones, I'd suggest you create an account and upload them. One of the problems with the hunting breed articles is that we have a lot of people who'd rather show their fat little pet dogs lying on the couch than a dog doing what it was bred for. The dogs are good examples of the standard, as far as I'm concerned. Also, the pup in the snow has a brown nose, not a black one. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 01:26, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor illustrations 

message: I'm sorry to have to undo all the recent edits since they were made in good faith, but the wording "should" is intentional here and is taken from the official breed standards. Not all dogs of the same breed will conform to the standard. No matter how well a dog is bred or how good the parents are, you can get dogs that don't fit the standard in one way or another. Like they're too big, the wrong color, etc. Doesn't mean they're a bad pet--or in this case a bad hunting dog--but they can't be shown. So, what might appear to be an opinion is one; the opinion of the breed registry. You're correct in thinking that the opinion of some random person can't be used, but the breed registry is a permissible source for this kind of article. (Wording it like that will also keep people from making silly complaints about crossbred or badly bred dogs that they own but don't look like the standard, so the standard is wrong according to them...) White Arabian Filly Neigh 21:22, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Recent reverts
Talk:Ah Long

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 07:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:Aim to Be a Pokémon Master

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 07:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links
Talk:Alan Reilly

message: This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it.  Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed.  I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy.  In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright.  If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally.  Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 07:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  YouTube links 
Talk:Mount Desert Island

message: I just removed this link. It looks useful, but it was posted by User:AcadiaMagic, which matches the domain name. Linkspam or not? --SarekOfVulcan 08:00, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: I looked at a map and it looks connected. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 67.110.221.182 (talk) 06:37, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: No, there's a short bridge here.--SarekOfVulcan 16:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: an island?

message: Most of this article (history section) is directly lifted from an official NPS park publication: http://www.nps.gov/acad/parkmgmt/upload/gg_sec3_cultural.pdf
165.83.133.248 (talk) 16:21, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: As a work of the U.S. Government, it's in the public domain. I have added a link to the article at the top of the section, though -- thanks for pointing it out!--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:29, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Plagiariazed

message: "Some residents stress the second syllable (/dɪˈzɜːrt/ dih-ZURT) in the French fashion ..."
How is this "the French fashion? It's pronounced very differently in French, and even the stressed second syllable isn't French. In French, most syllables have similar stress, and word-final syllables are slightly lengthened. The English pronunciation of the name with the English-language stress in the second syllable is so thoroughly anglicized that nobody who speaks French would call it "the French fashion". It's a name derived from French, pronounced in the English fashion.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.242.141.129 (talk) 22:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Desert?
Talk:Intermittent fault

message: I was surprised that this common phenomenon did not have its own article, so I have launched one. Though I have given it a reasonable introduction, it needs specialists and experts in the field of troubleshooting to expand it, and I warmly invite them to do so.
Headshaker 08:01, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Our team with the US military maintenance community use a technique called Certification Test Protocols (CTP) to detect the root cause of intermittent faults.  We have determined that it is most effective in eliminating "intermittent fault" symptoms in complex wiring such as that found in our military weapons. Crispyteal51 (talk) 17:09, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Template talk:San Miguel Beermen roster

message: :The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 
The result of the move request was: speedy keep, because there is nothing to discuss.The nominator appears not to have noticed that this page had been renamed from Template:Petron Blaze Boosters roster only two minutes before this discussion was opened, The result is a nomination which proposes no change in the page title. That is pointless. -- BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:29, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: Template:San Miguel Beermen roster →  – Starting next conference, Petron will be reverted to the San Miguel Beermen as part of its PBA Grand Slam's 25th Anniversary. 112.198.79.240 (talk) 16:04, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

text: The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move.  Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
----
Housekeeping lang po sa Coaches list ng SMB: Wala na si Jimmy Alapag dapat sa listahan. TY po  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.198.166.12 (talk) 13:46, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  Requested move
Talk:Long reach excavator

message: Article at present starts off with who first coined the term, and where the first machine was made... on and on. But 99.99% of wikipedia articles begin with a basic definition, like "A Long reach excavator is a machine that does X,Y,Z". Who first coined the term usually appears about halfway down the page in a section called "Entymology". This is very unusual. But it's not better. It's worse. After reading a while I still don't know what the thing is and that's why I came here. I'm all for innovation but this just looks like unthink. Friendly Person (talk) 02:15, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Poor form
Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Not in Portland (Lost)

message: I think we're all looking at the "word" of the law too much, and not enough at the "spirit" of the law; yes, the sources might not be OFFICIAL sources, but they still are probably true; the point is that this information was not just pulled out of someone's ass; these are in deed true facts about the episode, and THAT is more important than where the information comes from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zackkolin (talk • contribs) 
:"Probably true" isn't good enough.  Anyone could make a website and declare that episode 308 of Lost will be "Pulled Out Of My Ass".  Read WP:V, it explains the concept of verifiability.  This article is a perfect example of one that doesn't meet it at all.  --Milo H Minderbinder 14:18, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Talk:Corpus cavernosum penis

message: We're dealing with obsolete terminology here, but the corpus cavernosum penis and corpus cavernosum urethrae are not the same. The corpuse cavernosum urethrae is now known as the corpus spongiosum (i believe, i need to check my texts) and is different because its engorgement with blood doesn't primarily make it rigid to support erection, it makes the tissue expand to protect the dilated lumen of the penile urethra from compression. Robotsintrouble 08:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Be bold and fix as needed. --Arcadian 01:32, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I have fixed this. --Arcadian 20:07, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

message: Jelqing, claims the Corpus cavernosum penis to be stretchable, is there any reference? -- 172.177.252.23 13:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Jelqing 

message: HOW MUCH LENGTH WISE IS GOOD ENOUGH FOR A WOMAN CLMAX AND WHAT IS TH MOST AWOMAN CANHAVE INSERT?  JOE  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.235.51.244 (talk) 21:01, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: This is not the best article for addressing that question, though I see no specific discussion of the issue in the Human penis size article. In order to answer the above question, one must experiment to find the individual parameters, which vary greatly from person to person. Communication between partners will make the process easy — and even enjoyable. —Blanchette (talk) 06:37, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Question 

message: Added two references to this article since there has been no references at all.--Damirgraffiti ☺Say Yo to Me!☺   02:29, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Added references. 
Talk:Chayanta Province

message: Sorry, I got the "Chayanta Province" and "Chayanta Municipio" mixed up as I had not noticed both existed, my bad. That's why I moved the Province edition to Municipio so that the site's history is on the wrong article now. -- Meister 08:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Chayanta Province and Chayanta Municipio
Talk:N9NE Group

message: this is my first few contributions...i will try my best to improve the content...pls bear with me...thanks for the speedy comments, i was still working on it when i saw the comments...you may check back on this and comment, and will do more in the next couple of days...Chickville 08:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: It's been over a year. Have you done any more work on this, or what? Frvernchanezzz (talk) 08:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: This reads like a press release and will likely be of little interest to anyone but the owners' families.  Unless someone objects in the next week or two, I'm going to cut it back dramatically.  --66.28.243.126 (talk) 20:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Founders Section 
Talk:East Yi West Xia

message: Hello! Are you sure Fu Sinian is talking about the Shang-dynasty in his theory and not about the time before dynasties were established? Guss2 08:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Shang or pre-dynastic China?

message: The name of this article is awkward and should be renamed into something that makes sense in English.--Niohe 15:48, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe East Yi West Xia Theory? Guss2 15:56, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not comfortable with this mix of English and Chinese, it does not make sense for users who do not know any Chinese. Someone should read up an English translation of Fu Sinian's work and check whether there is a better name. I have seen somehing like "theory of plural origins of Chinese civilization," but that's tad long.--Niohe 15:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: As a matter of fact it is not a theory about plural origins, but about dual origins of Chinese civilization. A name like "theory of plural origins of Chinese civilization" should be used for quxi leixing 區系類型, a theory published by Su Bingqi in 1979. Guss2 16:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: OK, something containing dual origins, then.--Niohe 16:42, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: Maybe this one? Theories about the origins of Chinese civilization, though a long name also. It could describe the historiography from the traditional view of the importance of the centre, the theory by Fu Sinian (and Liang Siyong), the nuclear area hypothese by K.C. Chang and finally the hypothesis by Su Bingqi, which is the prevailing theory at the moment. Guss2 16:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Rename this article
Talk:The Legend of the North Wind

message: The evidence that this film is originally from Spain should be better sourced. We are the only site in the internet stating this, based only on the www.helsinki.fi reference that it's from Euskal Pictures International, which is in Spain. At best the original spanish title should be found. Hoverfish Talk 22:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: Google translate is not as helpful as I might wish.
# May 1993 article in El Pais indicates the film went to a festival in New York in 1993 and was up for one of the top three pr1zes. 
# May 1995 article in El Mundo indciates the film won something at the Houston Film Festival 
# July 1995 article in El Mundo confirms the sequel Return of the North Wind 
# November 2003 article in Cine por la Red indicates the the film was part of a Spanish animated fantasy films retrospective in 2003 
# March 2004 article in Agencia Peru shows the film was screened at a 2004 film festival in Peru 
These sources indicate the animated film won awards and was being screened at festivals more than 5 years after its initial release.  Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:18, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title: Spanish translation requested

message: Prodder was notified and has seen the courtesy message . Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:33, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Prodder notified 

message: Could someone fluent in Spanish look into Juan Baustista Berasategi's plagiarism lawsuit against the producers of this film? Using Google Translate, I am able to glean that Berasategi began the film (as "Balleneros"), I'm not sure how far he got, but somewhere down the line, the completed film was released with Carlos Varela and Maite Ruiz de Austri credited as directors. Berasategi sued the producers for plagiarism, and eventually won - I've seen a copy of the film which replaces Varela and Ruiz de Austri's director credit with one for Berasategi. (I uploaded a screenshot at http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/5633/vlcsnap2010090414h23m28.png.)
Can anyone look into this? Here are some Spanish websites which talk about it:
A page about Berasategi: http://www.euskomedia.org/aunamendi/13672
A page about the film: http://www.euskomedia.org/aunamendi/150097
This is some legal brief when the suit was decided: http://dreamers.com/cgibin/foros.cgi?foro=atimes?leer=48
--99.167.195.150 (talk) 20:21, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Juan Bautista Berasategi's lawsuit