Talk:Men Behind the Sun

message: :Image:MBTSDVD.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 22:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:MBTSDVD.jpg

message: This film was controversial due to its graphic images of an autopsy.  But it is also controversial as a work of anti-Japanese - and anti-American - propaganda.  
For instance the claim - repeated as if a fact - that "Dr. Ishii cooperates with the Americans, giving them his research and agreeing to work for them. Years later, he is moved to the Korean front, and biological weapons appear on the battlefield shortly thereafter" is simply wrong.  
Ishii actually worked for the Soviets, and then continued peacefully in post-war Japan.  He didn't work for the Americans, and biological weapons were not used in Korea by the Americans.  This is manifestly wrong, and worse, clearly Communist propaganda. Wikipedia should not be used to promote such lies.203.184.41.226 (talk) 07:57, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Controversy 

message: Can we please get a reliable source for the claim that the cat and rats were killed? I've heard multiple versions of this story (they were all really killed, it was all fake, the cat was a producer's cat and wasn't killed but the rats were, etc.), and while it's certainly worth mentioning on the page, it needs a source. At the moment, it has none. I'd do it myself, but I haven't been able to find a good source. If it says the director claims that the cat/rat scene is real, then it's easier to source. But I can't recall any source I've seen that has given any undeniable proof.
Riffraff913 (talk) 20:36, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  Animal Deaths 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Men Behind the Sun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071102232129/http://ofcs.rottentomatoes.com/click/movie-1082341/reviews.php?critic=movies&sortby=default&page=1&rid=186984 to http://ofcs.rottentomatoes.com/click/movie-1082341/reviews.php?critic=movies&sortby=default&page=1&rid=186984
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:37, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified