Talk:24 season 5

message: While I appreciate the efforts to provide summaries, perhaps we could keep them shorter?
--Destron Commander 03:55, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: I think we should use first names because that's what's used most on the show. Jtrost (T | C | #) 13:11, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Summaries

message: wouldn't it be a good idea to have a Season five picture on this page? It would help to make this page look better. I would do it, but i'm not very clear on the whole copyright thing. Dposse 02:10, 31 January 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: picture

message: Does anyone know when this series will start broadcasting in the UK? 81.159.6.49 17:26, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Air date in UK 

message: Leave the fox media info in. Goes to the speculative natuer of the show, and to a fuller reporting of known facts regarding the topic.ThuranX 03:07, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: 7:00 - 8:00 PM

message: Everyone, please wait until the next episode until we say that Tony is dead. I'm seriously considering protecting this article from people who keep vandalising it. dposse 04:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  It is NOT known if Tony is dead yet! 

message: The thing i have a problem with is that at the second that the show ended, i dont think he died. He might have died at 8:01, but at 7:59 he was still alive! You have to take into account when writing this summary the time factor. So for this article, we should put that he was unconcious. dposse 15:46, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: According to FOX's Ep Guide, he is dead when Jack is crying for help.  It sucks too, because if anyone deserves the silent clock, it would be TONY!  JurgenHadley 18:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  I have a problem with this. 

message: Everyone, we cannot have such crappy pictures on wikipedia! Almost all of the pictures are way too dark, and they don't belong here. Please, don't put a picture on ANY article unless you know that other people can see what the hell is going on in it! dposse 21:56, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Pictures on any article. 

message: how are they dark? your monitor's brightness must be too low.
please start tagging your posts with your name so we can know who you are. use the "~~~~". 
Anyway, i'm not the only one who thinks it is too dark. I'm pretty sure that my moniter is just fine. There is a HUGE difference between this picture and this picture.
Also, look at the difference between these two pictures:
Edgar1
Edgar2 
Don't you see the clear difference between the two?
We cannot have pictures like "jack assassin 5" or "Edgar12" on this article, or any article. It's just stupid. It cannot be that difficult to take a better picture. That is all i'm asking for. dposse 17:16, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  pictures 

message: who do people keep adding that useless trivia? does anyone really care? it was near 20 years ago... id keep removing it, but id like some input... -Xornok 18:49, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: robocop

message: I suggest a small speculation section about the preview of the next weeks show> I don't know if this is favorable, but it mght be a little intresting. --67.167.220.191 20:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
replies: text: We are not allowed to post speculation on Wikipedia. — Deckiller 22:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
thread_title:  Speculation 

message: Season 5 is the only pages that differs from the other 4 articles abot previous seasons. i would suggest that someone looks at the previous pages and ateempts to alter this article so that it conforms to this already established format. or i will do it myslef in the next day or two. 
Pat 10:18, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Conformity of Season pages

message: Since Graham's last name was never revealed in season 5, I don't think it's appropriate to list it here just because it is revealed in season 6.  The character's name in season 5 was simply "Graham", and that's how it should be listed here.  Anyone disagree?  --Serge 17:51, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: When you find out his last name, you will realise why there are concerns ;) -- Chuq 14:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I think the first mention of Graham should be changed as well, it is information that isn't revealed until season 6.  People are going to expect season five spoilers here, not ones for later seasons.  Any objection to removing the reveal of who Graham is?  --Milo H Minderbinder 14:56, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Listing Graham's season 6 last name in season 5 credits not appropriate 

message: Quick question - there any particular reason to be making single-purpose edits change to British spellings such as this? Bitnine 22:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Nope.  And WP policy says not to.  Spellings should be whatever is used first in "general" articles and either british or US for subjects that are specific to one country (such as US for a show like 24, British for Harry Potter).  --Milo H Minderbinder 13:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spelling question 

message: I've noticed that there's a large inconsistency between the episode summaries on Seasons 1-4, and Seasons 5 & 6.
1-4 have a table with a description of each summary, whereas 5 & 6 have only the links in the info box at the bottom of the page, which then goes to an article devoted to a particular episode.
Personally I think the style needs to be the same over all of the seasons, and secondly I think having a table summarising each episode in a season works the best.
As a compromise, the summary table should link to an article for each episode, just like how most other TV shows are laid on on Wikipedia. For example, List of scrubs episodes.
Do people have any thoughts on this? 
-- Daedalus 12:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Episode Summaries 

message: I've rated this article as start class because it contains most of the important information about the subject but contains few inline citations. I've rated it as low importance to wikiproject television as series articles are of comparitively low importance compared to article about entire shows.--Opark 77 21:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Assessment rating

message: I took off Tony's name on the list of deaths. Face it, he definatly alive. Howard Gordon confirmed it.Green Kirby 16:06, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
replies: text:  Do whatever you want to, but *on this page* you must not state anything about season six or seven content. This is *not* covered by spoiler warnings, spoilers may only reveal up to season five on this page. 80.187.105.241 (talk) 15:42, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
replies: text:  How correct is it to mention Tony being alive and reappearing in season 7 on the page regarding season 5? There are many people who visit this page to learn about season 5 and not about what'll come a couple of seasons later. Gevorg89 (talk) 22:08, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Tony's confirmed survival 

message: How does we know it takes place in 2011? There is no 100% confirmation SignorSimon 23:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Confirmed Date 

message: It is stated that terrorists led by Bierko are Chechens. Quote: "presumably Chechen, although this is never stated explicitly".
They are not (I'm almost sure) Chechens - they do not look like ones and they have names and surnames wich are uncommon for Chechens.
89.250.2.106 (talk) 17:20, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Russian terrorists in this season are not Chechens 

message: This is a general question for all articles about tv show episodes, feel free to participate in the discussion! Rayukk (talk) 19:58, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Television#RfC:_Should_TV_show_episode_articles_link_to_other_episodes_using_information.3F|RfC:Should TV show episode articles link to other episodes using information?]] 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on 24 (season 5). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100528005855/http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=013106_07 to http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=013106_07
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141011060528/http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=031406_03 to http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=031406_03
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100528010130/http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=050906_02 to http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=050906_02
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100528005920/http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=051606_06 to http://abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=051606_06
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:28, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified