Talk:Contradictions Collapse

message: :Image:Meshuggah-Contradictions.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Meshuggah-Contradictions.jpg

message: :Image:Meshuggah-Contradictions.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is  other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page.  Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Fair use rationale for Image:Meshuggah-Contradictions.jpg

message: I check pages listed in :Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of :Contradictions Collapse's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "Official bio":
From Meshuggah discography: 
From Meshuggah: 
Reference named "AMG bio":
From Meshuggah: 
From Meshuggah discography: 
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:38, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Orphaned references in [[:Contradictions Collapse]] 

message: Hi, I don't think alternative metal should be a genre listed so I am giving a week for any comments and then I will remove it. Lukejordan02 (talk) 02:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
replies: text: The source is pretty explicit: "the album generally falls into the alternative metal category". You don't get much more blatant than that, and Allmusic is considered reliable on Wikipedia (per WP:ALBUM/SOURCES). I don't see a good reason to remove it, especially since it's the only thing in this article that is actually sourced (and in fact, it contradicts "progressive metal"). I'm sure there are other sources out there that talk about the album's thrash metal, and possibly about progressive metal (although I wouldn't be surprised if there weren't, seeing as this album wasn't all that "progressive"). But no, I don't think "alternative metal" should be removed. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 03:48, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Genres 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
* 
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion