Talk:Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial

message: Although the foundation refers to the proposed memorial as a "national memorial", that exact phrasing does not seem to be finalized yet, in terms of congressional authorization.  The initial legislation (Public Law 104-333) does not use the term "national memorial." .  Currently, neither does the National Park Service.   They call it the Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial, similar to other sites or the Mall, such as the "Lincoln Memorial", "Thomas Jefferson Memorial", "George Mason Memorial", et cetera.
This, of course, may change with final Congressional authorization.  However, the designation means little in terms of how it is administered, nor in the honor conferred.  But this may require this wikipedia article to be renamed in the future. — Eoghanacht talk 16:36, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Proper designation for proposed memorial

message: As a proposed memorial, much of the infobox is blank.  The lat/long is based on a "best guess" given the recommended location. Also, I changed the reference from "second non-President so honored" to "third."  See: John Ericsson National Memorial and George Mason Memorial. — Eoghanacht talk 15:10, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: Infobox / 3rd non-presidential memorial on the mall

message: shouldn't there be a bit about the controversy of having a chinese guy being the sculptor for this? Skhatri2005 03:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Sculptor

message: This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:52, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: WikiProject class rating

message: It would be appropriate to change much of the past tense verbiage to present tense at this point.  I'll do it if I get some time. Originalname37 (Talk?) 18:36, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Past Tense 

message: As per my thread from years ago, the official name now seems to be "Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial."   Seem appropriate to move the page.  The target page is a redirect. — Eoghanacht talk 12:43, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed Page Move: "...National Memorial" → "...Memorial" 

message: I have marked four incomplete citations as "disputed".  This was the most specific tag that I could find for problematic sources, though it's certainly not great.  That said, the four templates that I marked (see diff where I marked them) don't have enough information in them, as they lacked an article, author, etc.  Basically, they lacked enough information to actually be useful.  Therefore I've tagged these for now so that the person who added these (or someone else) will be able to notice these and complete them.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:22, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Found a better tag.  Same intent, but now marked with , which has the same intent, but still marks the sources as problematic.  SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:39, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Citations marked as "disputed" 

message: a list article is in order?  Slowking4: 7@1|x 15:42, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: ok, done.  Slowking4: 7@1|x 20:12, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: nice job. the edit was a definite improvement.Millertime246 (talk) 20:16, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: it was a little coatracky here. nice list article though. need to fill in the artworks with articles. Slowking4: †@1₭ 22:03, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: split Artworks commemorating African-Americans in Washington, D.C. section

message: I rewrote the two sections discussing the inscription issue. The content that was here contained a number of errors and weirdnesses, such as the impression that Maya Angelou was the one to point out the paraphrased quote (which was clearly the work of Rachel Manteuffel); incorrectly stating the actual original quote as simply "If you want to say I was a drum major, say I was a drum major for justice"; and citing a USA Today article to back up the statement that the architect had said the quote wouldn't be changed, when the UT article was clearly just restating the content of the Post piece, and neither piece included such a statement (granted, the USA Today headline was misleading). Theoldsparkle (talk) 19:42, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: Good job! NearTheZoo (talk) 14:09, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Inscription controversy 

message: Who holds the copyright to the memorial sculpture? Kelly hi! 04:00, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Copyright 

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:MLK Memorial inscription wall.png Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, File:Martin Luther King, Jr Memorial at Dusk.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Martin Luther King, Jr Memorial at Dusk.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Martin Luther King, Jr Memorial at Dusk.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, File:Martin Luther King, Jr Memorial at Night.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Martin Luther King, Jr Memorial at Night.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Martin Luther King, Jr Memorial at Night.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, File:Martin Luther King, Jr Memorial and Washington Monument.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Martin Luther King, Jr Memorial and Washington Monument.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Martin Luther King, Jr Memorial and Washington Monument.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, File:Martin Luther King, Jr Memorial at Dusk South West View.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
* If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Martin Luther King, Jr Memorial at Dusk South West View.jpg)
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:38, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Martin Luther King, Jr Memorial at Dusk South West View.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:30, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Stone of Hope 2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:30, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Stone of Hope 3.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:30, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Stone of Hope 1.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:31, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Stone of Hope with sculptor Lei Yixin.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:31, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Obama family at MLK Memorial.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: An image used in this article, , has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 
;What should I do?
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
* If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
* If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant 
This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:48, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: File:Martin Luther King, Jr. Memorial Plaque.jpg Nominated for Deletion

message: I changed the link for the Memorial Foundation website from mlkmemorial.org (which showed the domain expired at the end of 2013) to thememorialfoundation.org.  I know this is just a change but wanted a longer explanation in case a future editor was concerned. Dalton Imperial (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
thread_title: Memorial Foundation and fundraising website change

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Martin Luther King, Jr. which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RMCD bot 21:59, 10 July 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110906015520/http://17th-house.com/site/?page_id=59 to http://17th-house.com/site/?page_id=59
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061019021602/http://www.black-collegian.com/african/mlk/monument1299.shtml to http://www.black-collegian.com/african/mlk/monument1299.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive http://webarchive.loc.gov/all/20081024042358/http://www.realtor.org/about_nar/mlk_memorial.html to http://www.realtor.org/about_nar/mlk_memorial.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:42, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (January 2018) 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the . —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:36, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion 

message: The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
* 
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:24, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
thread_title:  A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion