lflage/wiki-talks huggingface dataset:
Talk:List of video games based on DC Comics

message: Please use this article if a "DC Games" division ever comes. I'm somewhat surprised it doesn't exist already. However, a lot could happen with WBD's reconstruction of DC Entertainment and WB Games. MegaSmike46 (talk) 23:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: Sorry, what exactly are you saying/suggesting here? I don't expect anything about this article to change in the event of corporate restructuring. Like half the games listed here aren't even published by WB anyway. ShyKen (talk) 21:59, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I said, "if it happens." "DC Games" could simply be a branded label. I'd be similar to Marvel Games, which started in 2009 (just before joining Disney) despite having games since the 1980s. It's just in case. MegaSmike46 (talk) 21:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: I understand that. The part I don't understand what you're saying should be done with this article if that happens. As I mentioned before I don't expect anything here to change if WB restructures or rebrands their games division. So... why are we talking about this? What are you expecting to happen with this article if that happens? ShyKen (talk) 22:49, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: There's more been more reports at DC Studios with James Gunn. So let's just wait and see. https://comicbook.com/gaming/news/video-game-release-dates-2022-ps5-xbox-series-x-nintendo-switch-pc/#1 24.126.30.250 (talk) 03:16, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  DC Games
Talk:List of Christian video games by genre

message: We've got List of Christian video games by genre and List of Christian video games by release; these two should be merged into List of Christian video games. It's a relatively small list which can easily mention chronological release and its video game genre. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:35, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: Yeah, that's true. There's also WP:CONSISTENCY to keep in mind; we don't have List of first-person shooters by release either. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 09:07, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal
Talk:Methyl fluorosulfonate

message: The article claims that the toxicity of methyl fluorosulfonate is due to the methylation of lipids in cell membranes.  This seems unlikely to me, as most lipids lack nucleophilic groups.  I would suspect methyl fluorosulfonate likely alkylates and denatures the membrane proteins instead.  Since I can't get access to reference 1, I would suggest removing this bit of speculation.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.189.251.1 (talk) 21:00, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Methylating lipids?
Talk:Syracuse, Kansas

message: If you would like to edit this article, please review the following to get a better idea of what to include:
# All city articles MUST follow this guideline for layout and content: Wikipedia:USCITY
# Please examine these city examples: Lock Haven, Pennsylvania; Stephens City, Virginia; Kent, Ohio; Tulsa, Oklahoma; Grand Forks, North Dakota.
# Please do NOT add text that sounds like a realtor advertisement, but instead write like a neutral-party encyclopedia.
# Please read the  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. 
# How to cite sources by adding references? Add references or someone may delete your text.
# What is Verifiability?
Sbmeirow (talk) 07:39, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing This Article 
Talk:Tier 2 capital

message: I think hybrid instruments are now included in tier 1. If I remember to look it up, I'll post back. Tristanreid 16:48, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Hybrid instruments

message: I understood that there was such a thing as tier 3 capital?  I understood it to be fairly limited in its use and was just for supporting the trading book and fx risk.  If anyone knows about this a page on it would be good. 82.211.86.2 14:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Tier 3 capital

message: I have removed the tag which requires additional citations and reliable references. This is because most of the material is covered in the first reference provided to the Basel II accord. However, it would be great if an expert takes a look at the material and decides if further modification is required.
--Anindya m 1982 (talk) 15:05, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Comments on overall page 
Talk:Xploder

message: For the original playstation, Xploder never made any CD-bootable cheating cd's. And it wasn't possible to play copied or neither other area code games with Xploder. I have owned several different cheat cartridges for Playstation and Playstation 2. There was bootable cheating CD's for Playstation 2, because there was no 3rd party device plug on the Playstation 2. But on the first original playstation, there was some other cheat cartridges which allowed users to play copied or other area coded games, Equalizer was one of these. Action Replay neither was able to launch any other game than the console normally would allow.
There is an fly-by-cd-swap method which allows users to play copied or other area coded games on the playstation 1. Even with xploder, users had to use that fly-by-cd-swap method or modchip installed on the console.
-User who currently owning and using Xploder, have owned several playstations, several Xploders/Xplorers, Action Replays and one Equalizer, and Action Replay booting CD's for Playstation 2 etc..  — Preceding unsigned comment added by MikkoMuhis (talk • contribs) 01:12, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled
Talk:Rolla, Kansas

message: # Please read  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. This  cheatsheet is useful.
# Please read  content guidelines for US city articles.
: Sbmeirow (talk) 01:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing The Article 
Talk:Mitsubishi Ki-30

message: Bill Gunston's book claims that the production aircraft used the "Mitsubishi Ha-5 Zuisei" engine, but since I personally can't tell which of the sources would be more reliable, I think it's better to keep it as it says in the David Mondey's book, of which the whole article seems to borrow more.
Läyhä 13:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ki-30's engine
Talk:Richfield, Kansas

message: # Please read  editing tutorial and  new contributor help page before editing the first time. This  cheatsheet is useful.
# Please read  content guidelines for US city articles.
: Sbmeirow (talk) 01:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Important Notes Before Editing The Article 
Template talk:Moved talk

message: Use this template to mark discussions that have been moved from one talk page to another.
Caution: do not move a discussion if you think there is any chance that this will disturb contributors. Don't do this to "shut off" a discussion, but to make sure it "carries on" in the right place. When in doubt, ask. If still in doubt, don't do it! --Uncle Ed 16:52, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Template talk:User WikiProject Buddhism

message: I find the image in this userbox extremely hard to see. Is there any chance we could get it changed? Colincbn 16:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Ok, I fixed it myself. I hope nobody has has a problem with this change and that this will be visible for everyone. Colincbn 17:05, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Image hard to see

message: As mentioned on Template_talk:Buddhism, I'd like to restore the prior transparent Buddha-in-lotus image to this template.  More specifically, I'd like to replace :Image:Lotus-buddha.svg  (which seems to somehow have been overwritten relatively recently) to :Image:Lotus75.png . Any objections? Thanks, Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 12:33, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Done. Larry Rosenfeld (talk) 08:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: Now that Buddha is no longer lime, I'll give it a go at changing it back to SVG. —The preceding signed comment was added by Cadby (talk • contribs) 23:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: lime Buddha?
Talk:Probability of kill

message: This article states: "for example, it has been stated that the SA-10 surface-to-air missile system has a Pk of 0.9 against highly maneuvering targets, whereas its Pk against non-maneuvering targets is much higher." How much higher than 90% can you get - 100% maybe? Is that really "much higher"?  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.158.48.16 (talk) 12:16, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
thread_title: Huh?
Talk:Stanley High School, Southport

message: There are several claims in this article which require the citation of verifiable sources to back them up. These include the following paragraphs and sentences:
:"The school's examination performance has led to it receiving a School Achievement Award for three years in succession. In 2006, 73% of Year 11 students achieved the benchmark standard of five good GCSE results, up from 68% in 2005."[citation needed]:
:"In June 2006 Stanley was graded outstanding for its performance in Art and Design. The last full inspection was in 2007 when the school was judged to be satisfactory overall."[citation needed]
:.."It has been a designated specialist Sports College since 2003."[citation needed]
Also the paragraph below has issues with quoting a wikipedia article as an in-text source:
:"This performance places the school in the top 20% of English schools for value added between ages 11 and 16, and the top 10% between ages 14 and 16. Source: DfES." 
Perhaps some of the contributing editors will be able to address these issues. Thanks, Nk.sheridan   Talk 22:02, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  [[WP:CITE|Citation]] issues within this article
Talk:Line of sight (video games)

message: *http://books.google.nl/books?id=lbALAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA168&dq=%22line+of+sight%22+gaming&hl=en&sa=X&ei=d3V8VIHsHsbAPJ_lgKgF&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
*http://books.google.nl/books?id=hDZRa52__F8C&pg=PA95&dq=%22line+of+sight%22+gaming&hl=en&sa=X&ei=d3V8VIHsHsbAPJ_lgKgF&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22line%20of%20sight%22%20gaming&f=false
*http://books.google.nl/books?id=E9JG6JjPU-sC&pg=PA70&dq=%22line+of+sight%22+gaming&hl=en&sa=X&ei=d3V8VIHsHsbAPJ_lgKgF&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22line%20of%20sight%22%20gaming&f=false
*http://books.google.nl/books?id=Kuh45Irvt0QC&pg=PA88&dq=%22line+of+sight%22+gaming&hl=en&sa=X&ei=d3V8VIHsHsbAPJ_lgKgF&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22line%20of%20sight%22%20gaming&f=false
*http://books.google.nl/books?id=2Oefv8OXlxQC&pg=PA180&dq=%22line+of+sight%22+gaming&hl=en&sa=X&ei=d3V8VIHsHsbAPJ_lgKgF&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22line%20of%20sight%22%20gaming&f=false
*http://books.google.nl/books?id=UbMLAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA402&dq=%22line+of+sight%22+gaming&hl=en&sa=X&ei=d3V8VIHsHsbAPJ_lgKgF&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22line%20of%20sight%22%20gaming&f=false
*http://books.google.nl/books?id=IytuAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT8&dq=%22line+of+sight%22+gaming&hl=en&sa=X&ei=Y3Z8VKnCC4TOPYnJgcAB&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=%22line%20of%20sight%22%20gaming&f=false
There are surprisingly many decent references here to work from, a lot of them having "line of sight" in the title of a paragraph. I might work on this article when I have the time, but here's some references for people to work with. We really don't need such a tacked on examples section to explain what line of sight is, how it is used, and what people think of the common mechanic. I didn't even think the article had any encyclopedic value next to fog of war, but I guess I was wrong. ~Maplestrip (chat) 14:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Reference dump 

message: Article on stealth video games links here, so I think this article probably could be expanded to incorporate concept of line of sight as used by AI in videogames - especially since sometimes those overlap, since e.g. X-Com series is a series of strategy games that determines what both players can see through fog of war by combining data from field of view of all soldiers of said side, and the same time, the same data of line of sight is used to determine if a soldier can shoot at the target, similarly to how wargames and RPGs use the concept.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shinobody (talk • contribs) 09:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: I agree that that would be a good idea, as line-of-sight is a common mechanic in stealth games (possibly even a defining one). If you can find sources discussing it, go ahead :) ~Mable (chat) 09:34, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  Outside wargames/rpgs? 
Talk:Build order

message: I removed the example build order for Starcraft's 6-pool zergling rush, as there was no citation, and I don't think it was encyclopedic anyway.  Further, the optimal order likely changes with each balance update (e.g. as unit/building costs and build times change).
--Dzhim (talk) 20:40, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
thread_title:  Removed 6-pool rush order
Talk:Objective Code

message: Um...a google on "objective Code" code only turns up about 22,700 some hits, and a quick scan of the results would seem to indicate that very few of them concern the subject of this article; while both "object code" and "object file" each produce over a million hits. I don't understand what the point of moving this article to "objective code" was, especially since it is going to be confused with things like Objective-C, etc. 209.92.136.131 16:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: The only place where I agree with the person who did the move is in his/her comment for the move - "Mistake".  It was definitely a mistake, and I moved it back. Guy Harris 17:27, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
Talk:Jumping puzzle

message: Is a jumping puzzle not a platformer? A level which has many different playstyles listed in the article is not a platformer... Get it straight. Maybe it should go to platformer or platform game instead?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.90.103.165 (talk) 21:50, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Why does jumping puzzle lead to Level? 

message: Would an article relating to Environmental puzzles in general be more appropriate as a catchment for jumping puzzle? (I'm thinking games like Portal (video game), narbacular drop, Prince of persia, Shadow of the colossus, etc?  A quick google shows some support for this naming (though, as with many things video games, I can't see any obvious consensus on it).  I think such a page has much more scope for expansion and improvement. Playclever (talk) 23:33, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Broaden scope to [[Environmental puzzle]]?
Talk:Prosopography

message: Being a rookie at cite.php, could someone with more experience change Note 2? The classic series of volumes is of course Prosopographia Imperii Romani, and it deals with the Roman Principate, as opposed to the Principiate. Thanks. Thomas78 17:02, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: [Untitled]

message: The intro is WAY too long, and needs to be given a section title. I"m not familiar enough with this topic to do so, but pelase, get a section title. ThuranX 20:22, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not familiar with the subject either, but after reading the article I felt 'History of prosopography' would be the best title for this section, so added it in. Terraxos 20:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Revision 

message: What happened to the stuff about prosopography of ancient Rome? I have links to this article that are now less helpful. Cynwolfe (talk) 15:03, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Ubi sunt Romani? 

message: Except for the mention of Erben's piece on 19th century England, the assumption in the article seems to be that prosopography is expected to deal almost exclusively with classical & medieval topics. This is an outdated view. At the point where academic history and serious genealogical research meet, there has been, for a couple of decades, considerable use of prosopographical methods in analyzing communities and extended family groups. This has been done (and published about) regarding the Plymouth settlement, the Missouri Ozarks, the counties of Texas that border the Red River, and the Boonesboro settlement in Kentucky. And that's just what comes to mind. I guess I'll have to find time to extend the coverage, but I hope other readers will add a note pointing to other modern-era prosopographical studies that ought to be included. --Michael K SmithTalk  14:27, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Needs to be broadened
Talk:Plainsong (band)

message: Plainsong guitarist David Richards died January 19, 2019. (He also played in PC Kent, Grimms, Scaffold and the Bonzo Dog Band.) - Oniscoid 23:07, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
thread_title: David Richards

message: "The band's name was picked on a whim when they randomly opened a copy of The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Music to find Plainsong at pages 450-451." According to Dave Richards (conversation December 2016) there was also a connection with the John Renbourn instrumental guitar piece of the same name. - Oniscoid 09:11, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title: Origin of Band Name
Talk:Game Jackal

message: "Slysoft have announced that Game Jackal is no longer available for sale due to circumstances beyond their control, and have closed the offical website."
Will someone who knows more than me about writing protocol (and preferably about Game Jackal) please edit the whole article to reflect the fact that it is no more?   P1h3r1e3d13 22:14, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Past tense

message: This seems to be a Video Games article, not a Video Game Gameplay article.  It has to do with the mechanics of running game software on a computer, not the actual gameplay of any video game. Metlslime 00:58, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Wrong Category?

message: what sense does the section make, when legality issues depend on the respective country? this is not taken into account there. there's no such thing as _absolute_ legality (independent of law used). 91.15.137.23 (talk) 15:08, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  legality 
Talk:Paper doll (video games)

message: Is this real ? Or did someone just make this up for a joke ? 'Paper Doll' ? I've never, ever heard this expression before.
:I was thinking the same, but apparently, it's a thing: https://www.google.com/search?q=paper+doll+rpg&hl=en&gbv=2&prmd=ivns&source=lnms&tbm=bks&sa=X&ei=jk90VIeGG4LlaKvugNgL&ved=0CAoQ_AU Hmm, not a term I've ever heard of before, but it's definitely a common element in role-playing video games. I'll see if I can get some references. This one seems to be in Indonesian, though: http://books.google.nl/books?id=TbYtABrP5ZcC&dq=paper+doll+rpg&source=gbs_navlinks_s ~ Maplestrip (talk) 09:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  For real ?
Talk:Automap

message: I think there should be a top line that reffers people to the map generating article--Henke37 22:40, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Top line 

message: Will someone tell me the difference between automap and mini-map they seem to me to be very similar, a lot of overlap in what they could be. Many game maps I know could be both mini-map and automap at the same time. The only definite difference I can see is the mini-map is in the corner of the screen and automap is in the centre of the screen and/or has to be bought up manually. Both may be turned on or off in some games, both show same things enemies, allies, terrain, other important locations and items. Both may show the whole area or just the surrounding area. 
Both may be obscured by blackness/fog of war and drawn automatically as the player uncovers the environment. Some mini-maps are completely uncovered at the start Grand Theft Auto, Powermonger. But like automaps most mini-maps are obscured by fog of war, like most strategy games Civ, Age of Empires.
So are automap and mini-map different things, and what's the big difference.
Carlwev (talk) 18:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: Automap has been merged into Mini-Map Brightgalrs (/braɪtˈɡælˈeːrɛz/)[1] 07:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: [[Automap]] vs [[Mini-map]]
Talk:Random dungeon

message: Final Fantasy and Chrono Cross have random dungeons? I don't remember that. I think this part is wrong. --MK (talk) 13:36, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
replies: text: I added an unsourced tag to that section for now.  Hopefully people will soon start adding references for all the items on that list. I may take a look into myself at some point. —<B>Torchiest</B> talkedits 14:54, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Final Fantasy and Chrono Cross

message: Will this article eventually explain the methods that are used for the procedural generation of random dungeons? I think it would be better if the article explained which techniques were the most commonly employed (cellular automata, L-system fractals, etc.). Jarble (talk) 17:59, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
thread_title: Discussion of algorithms or methods for procedural terrain generation

message: According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roguelike (look at "Concurrent variants"), the first rogue-like was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beneath_Apple_Manor.  It's also a little weird that this page asserts that it's usually Action RPGs that feature random dungeons.  There's a lot of random dungeons in turn-based RPGs as well.--Cowgod14 (talk) 02:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
thread_title: Contradicts Rogue-like page
Talk:Jerry Garcia Band

message: At Elephant's Memory it is claimed that the Jerry Garcia Band at a Hell's Angels Pirates Party in 1973, which obviously doesn't agree with them being founded in 1975. Presumably the date of 1973 is correct, so this had to be a different entity? Seattle Jörg (talk) 07:44, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
replies: text: I'm not sure what that would refer to.  I'm looking at DeadBase XI, the 1999 book, and that has a chapter called GarciaBase, which lists all of the Jerry Garcia side project concerts, or at least the ones that were known at that time.  According to the book, the Jerry Garcia Band formed in 1975, and their first lineup was the one heard on Let It Rock: The Jerry Garcia Collection, Vol. 2.  As substantiated by the footnotes in the album article, that lineup lasted from August to December of '75.  (In January of '76, Jimmy Booker replaced Nicky Hopkins on keyboards for a grand total of two shows, and then Keith and Donna Jean Godchaux joined the band.) — Mudwater (Talk) 19:59, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
thread_title:  When formed? 

message: Hello!  Thanks for your edits to this article, here and here.  But, the albums Garcia Live Volume Three and  Garcia Live Volume Six are by Legion of Mary and by Jerry Garcia and Merl Saunders, respectively.  They're not Jerry Garcia Band albums.  That's why they don't say Jerry Garcia Band on the covers.  The Jerry Garcia Band is not just any band with Jerry Garcia in it, it's the band that billed itself by that actual name.  It didn't even exist until August 1975.  That's why I took those albums back out of the Discography section.  Hopefully that makes sense.  (I would encourage you to post here with any thoughts you might have on this subject.)  — Mudwater (Talk) 16:15, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
replies: text: @Mudwater — I totally appreciate your level of specificity. I was looking more at the GarciaLive umbrella of releases. Thanks for the explanation/reasoning. Boulder Museumdork (talk) 17:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Discography
Talk:Beneath the Sky

message: *The are metalcore but the vocals, technical drumming, and overall agression is from Death metal. Metalcore is a mix of hardcore and a metal genre. They mix hardcore with death. Therefore they are deathcore. Metalcore is way to vague. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.95.164.167 (talk) 21:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled