Talk:Warwick

message: *****En tout cas moe avoir un chateau, je voudrais qu'il soit comme celui la.*****  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Somysam (talk • contribs) 16:25, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
thread_title: Untitled

message: How's it pronounced?
:War-ick (second W is silent).mais (talk) 20:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
replies: text: It's actually pronounced as Worrick. See Chiswick for another place-name with a silent 'W'. Ian Dunster (talk) 09:45, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The IPA in the article is correct. --Ukslim (talk) 13:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: The IPA is indeed correct, although I think Warrick (as in warrior or warren) would be a better laymans/non-ipa example due to the only worr- word I can think of being worry, which is a totally different sound. 86.157.88.31 (talk) 02:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
thread_title: Pronunciation

message: While I have no reason to doubt the history-section, I'd like to add a bit in here for information. See, there is a danish town called Varde (I live there). Its viking name is/was Warwik. Being an ancient town located at an important waterway in Denmark (in the viking age anyway) is it feasible that Warwick gets its name from the viking town of Warwik?--Nwinther (talk) 09:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
replies: text: This site gives the root of Warwick as from the Old English weir, meaning a weir of dam, and wic meaning farm. Although this is about the personal name rather than the place name, the derivation is likely similar. Old English was influenced by Old Norse, so while there may be a link between the two towns, it's likely they got their names from having similar features rather than one being named after the other. Nev1 (talk) 17:06, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

text: Curious indeed. Isaac Taylor states outright that Warwick appeared as Wæringawic and Wæringwic in Anglo-Saxon and that, therefore, Warwick was the abode of the Wærings or Varangians (Væringjar in Old Norse). Grant Allen makes a similar assertion about Warrington. Unless someone objects, I will insert that as a proposed derivation. Waering (talk) 02:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
replies: text: The more I dig into this, the less "weir" makes sense to me. I can't find weir spelled waer in any Old English dictionary. It's always wer. Search here and here, for example. Waering (talk) 06:08, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  History 

message: There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Warwick (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you.  —RM bot 20:31, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
thread_title: Move discussion in progress

message: I would like an explanation from Nev1 as to why s/he has reverted (in this edit) my recent addition to the 'Education' section.  As all that it contained was additional, factual, referenced, information about schools provided for Warwick residents.  The edit sumary: "this is about Warwick please remain focussed" doesn't seem to explain the reasoning.  I'll add it back (in a tidier form, possibly), but please don't remove it all again.  If you have problems with the content or the wording please discuss it here and we'll see if we can thrash it out amicably.  This is an article about Warwick - as a whole - not just, say, the buildings in Warwick.  I see it covers other services and facilities available to the the people of Warwick which aren't all physically located in Warwick and I do not understand the reluctance to accept my contribution. Twopenneth (talk) 20:44, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
thread_title:  Explanation required from Nev1 please 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Warwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090729074316/http://www.statistics.gov.uk:80/statbase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8276&More=Y to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8276&More=Y
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090804232415/http://www.statistics.gov.uk:80/statbase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8326&More=Y to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8326&More=Y
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:12, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Warwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090804211441/http://www.statistics.gov.uk:80/statbase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8283&More=Y to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8283&More=Y
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101206014023/http://www.statistics.gov.uk:80/statbase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8271&More=Y to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8271&More=Y
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:16, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on Warwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090804230603/http://www.statistics.gov.uk:80/statbase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8349&More=Y to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8349&More=Y
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:42, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Warwick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131020235146/http://www.warwickdc.gov.uk/WDC/Leisure/Tourism%2Band%2Btravel/Twinning/ to http://www.warwickdc.gov.uk/WDC/Leisure/Tourism+and+travel/Twinning/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:08, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Warwick also is the name of a bass guitar builder in Germany, owned by Framus.
http://www.warwickbass.com/en/Home.html  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Basvossen (talk • contribs) 18:49, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
replies: text: Already got an article Warwick_(company). G-13114 (talk) 18:52, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  Bass guitars 

message: User:Bmcln1 appears to have some WP:OWNERSHIP issues with this article. Specifically their dogged insistence that the lead section should be compressed into a single paragraph, and their insistence on edit warring on any attempt to lengthen or split it up. 
I would like to take issue with this for a number of reasons: Firstly it's unnecessary, secondly I think it makes it less readable, thirdly it goes against the guidance on the length of lead sections at the Manual of Style, which suggests that the appropriate length for the lead section of articles with 15,000–30,000 characters is two or three paragraphs. As the article as it currently stands has around 19,000 characters that would suggest two or three paragraphs is the appropriate length for the lead on this article, which was what I put in my recent edits. Indeed, looking at other county town articles of similar size, such as Bedford, Winchester and Aylesbury, for example, two or three paragraphs appears to be a fairly normal length for articles of similar size to this. So I would suggest that the insistence on the lead being compressed into a single paragraph is completely unjustified, and especially repeatedly edit warring over the issue. G-13114 (talk) 11:56, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Lead section