Talk:Doublet (linguistics)

message: Would be great to have some references here. I'm also guilty of not including references/links, but in trying to build it found a great site - http://www.etymonline.com/abbr.php
----
Yes, a great resource etymonline is.  I'm about to propose a merge w/ etymological twins.  What do you think? Adam Mathias 01:38, 5 February 2006 (UTC)
thread_title: old talk

message: Your example implies that Cordial, Heart and Sincere all have the same root-  Cordial and Heart might, but Sincere comes from the latin meaning 'without a crack' or something like that, I'm sure, so if I'm right this doesn't make sense?!
IceDragon64 (talk) 00:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
thread_title:  Triplet example queried 

message: This is listed as a couplet although I don't think they have the same root.  Am I misunderstanding something? Quantumelfmage (talk) 05:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
replies: text: They're generally traced back to a common Indo-European stem pronounced something like gwow... AnonMoos (talk) 13:08, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cow/Beef 

message: The statements about cow and boef are unsettling. Germanic speaking lower classes were ruled over by French aristocrats. Cow was of Germanic origin and boef was the translation into French. Nearly every word in English has two origins; Germanic and French. The laws were written in both. ie Break and Entre, Assault and Battre, Will and Testament, Chicken and Poulet (poultry), Swine and Pork.
This is not "borrowing" it is massive importing. These words did not grow up together.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.141.52.159 (talk) 20:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
thread_title:  Cow/Beef revisited 

message: I've read somewhere that the native English cognate of the word "loot" (a relatively recent loan from Hindi) is "leaf".
The meanings are, of course, incredibly off; EtymOnline follows "loot" to Sanskrit lota-m "stolen property", and "leaf" to PIE *leup "to break off" (bridging most of the meaning gap).
Is it true? It might well be; if so should it get included in the article?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.179.218.11 (talk) 12:09, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
replies: text: According to American Heritage Dictionary, that's more the Hindi form, while the Sanskrit form is "loptra"... AnonMoos (talk) 11:10, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Loot/Leaf 

message: I *think* these are all related, but I would need someone smarter than me to check.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.244.79.57 (talk) 01:19, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
thread_title:  Over/Upper/Hyper/Super 

message: : Another possibility is borrowing from both a language and its daughter language. In English this is usually Latin and some other Romance language, particularly French ....
: Less directly, a term may be borrowed both directly from a source language and indirectly via an intermediate language. In English this is most common in borrowings from Latin, and borrowings from French that are themselves from Latin ....
Are these two paragraphs intended to be distinct?  If so, I'm having a hard time with even the possibility of the latter, let alone an example.  We'd need a word that was borrowed (rather than inherited with the usual changes) by French from Latin, and then borrowed into English from the French borrowing; a way to distinguish that from a direct Latin→English borrowing; and a separate direct Latin→English borrowing of the same word, resulting in a distinct form. —Tamfang (talk) 21:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  doublet paragraphs 

message: What's with the superscript z in two of the Polish examples? —Tamfang (talk) 07:47, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
thread_title:  Polish 

message: Why is "Dialect borrowing" redirected to this article? The only use I can find for "Dialect borrowing" is from Bloomfield's Language (1933), which doesn't seem to have anything at all to do with doublets.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshisanonymous (talk • contribs) 17:21, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
replies: text: (New matter at the bottom, please, using the new section button.)  Dialect borrowing can create doublets; but that's not a good enough reason to redirect here rather than to Loanword. —Tamfang (talk) 17:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
thread_title: Redirect for "Dialect borrowing"

message: Firstly, there's no evidence that Spanish 'dinero' came through an Arabic intermediate, so I'm going to change that. It's simply derived from Latin denarius, with the initial -i- perhaps due to influence from a Greek form, which affected most of the Romance descendants. Every etymological source I consulted seems to list it as just a descendant of the Latin (http://dle.rae.es/?id=Doas5g0, https://www.scribd.com/doc/157209215/Diccionario-Critico-Etimologico-castellano-C-F-Corominas-Joan-pdf, etc.) It's true that some Arabic languages use a form 'dinar' but that was probably separate from the Spanish, which evolved the normal ending from '-arius' to '-ero' (same with Portuguese 'dinheiro', Catalan 'diner', French 'denier', etc.)
Also, all of the Romance languages have copious amounts of doublets, not just Spanish. Should sections be included for them too? Wiktionary is working on compiling an extensive list of doublets as well. Word dewd544 (talk) 04:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  Spanish section 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Doublet (linguistics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://archive.is/20141106161903/http://hoapp.com/thread-81754-1-1.html to http://hoapp.com/thread-81754-1-1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: The Wikipedia article lists “lau” as a cognate for “day” words in Welsh. The day part in Difiau is the beginning, not the end.80.187.81.23 (talk) 11:31, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
thread_title:  Welsh 

message: The definition "different phonological forms but the same etymological root" can be misconstrued as (and this has happened on Bengali wiktionary): 'anything coming from (e.g.) the Arabic root 'k-t-b' is a doublet'.
The point is that derivations are not the same word and don't suddenly become doublets when both of them are borrowed by another language.
This also implies that some terms from a list like "right, rich, raj, rex, regalia, regal, reign, royal, and real" are not really doublets. Exarchus (talk) 11:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
thread_title:  Vague definition