Talk:National Portrait Gallery, London

message: to not merge the two articles. -- Yellowdesk (talk) 16:52, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: Shouldn't your merger proposal then be on Talk:National Portrait Gallery copyright conflicts? Nunquam Dormio (talk) 11:09, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
replies: text: I don't think so, no. See Wikipedia:Merging_and_moving_pages#Proposing_a_merger where it says Create one discussion section, typically on the destination article's Talk page (which is this page). But it doesn't matter where it's discussed exactly, so long as both the source and destination article merge templates point here (which I believe they do) so that interested parties can find the discussion. ++Lar: t/c 21:15, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
thread_title:  Merge proposal to bring [[National Portrait Gallery copyright conflicts]] here 

message: It is slightly erroneous to connect the sweating and labour involved in hard labour with the PhotoCopying. 
There is a contention seen on this site under the heading:  Where Wikipedia became a knave on this topic.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.201.253.169 (talk) 10:28, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
thread_title:  Where Wikipedia became a knave 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to  on National Portrait Gallery, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add  after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add  to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090721160006/http://www.courtsni.gov.uk:80/en-GB/AboutUs/Community+Programmes/Heritage/rcjheritage.htm to http://www.courtsni.gov.uk/en-GB/AboutUs/Community+Programmes/Heritage/rcjheritage.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified 

message: Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on National Portrait Gallery, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081204010257/http://www.artinfo.com/galleryguide/18664/5243/about/national-portrait-gallery-london/ to http://www.artinfo.com/galleryguide/18664/5243/about/national-portrait-gallery-london/
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120825122623/http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/artslife/story.html?id=f76fcf3a-8f3e-46bf-bb1d-ebce6be3446e&k=48373&p=1 to http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/artslife/story.html?id=f76fcf3a-8f3e-46bf-bb1d-ebce6be3446e&k=48373&p=1
*Added  tag to http://www.xreferplus.com/entry.jsp?xrefid=6156884&secid=.-&hh=1
*Added  tag to http://www.xreferplus.com/entry.jsp?xrefid=6123741&secid=.-&hh=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:27, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
thread_title:  External links modified (February 2018) 

message: When should there be a mention of the proposed closure for refurbishment included? Jackiespeel (talk) 11:33, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: Added. Johnbod (talk) 17:38, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: 'As a generalisation' given the frequency of delays and changes with such major changes announced somewhat in advance have to consider how long a lead-in is appropriate. Jackiespeel (talk) 12:05, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
replies: text: They just announced the details, some 6 months ahead. This seems reasonable, as does a certain scepticism on the re-opening date. Johnbod (talk) 17:23, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
thread_title:  Proposed closure